APPLICATIONS OF DYNAMICS 
 
 TO 
 
 PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY 
 
 BY 
 
 J. J. THOMSON, M.A., F.R.S. 
 
 FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE AND CAVENDISH PROFESSOR 
 OF EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS, CAMBRIDGE. 
 
 (j UNJVEKSITY 
 
 MACMILLAN AND CO. 
 
 AND NEW YORK. 
 1888 
 
 [All Rights reserved.] 
 
PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. & SONS, 
 AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 
 
 3 
 
J 
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 THE following pages contain the substance of a 
 course of lectures delivered at the Cavendish Labora- 
 tory in the Michaelmas Term of 1886. 
 
 Some of the results have already been published 
 in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal 
 Society for 1886 and 1887, but as they relate to 
 phenomena which belong to the borderland between 
 two departments of Physics, and which are generally 
 either entirely neglected or but briefly noticed in 
 treatises upon either, I have thought that it might 
 perhaps be of service to students of Physics to 
 publish them in a more complete form. I have 
 included in the book an account of some investiga- 
 tions published after the delivery of the lectures 
 which illustrate the methods described therein. 
 
 There are two modes of establishing the connexion 
 between two physical phenomena ; the most obvious 
 as well as the most interesting of these is to start 
 with trustworthy theories of the phenomena in ques- 
 tion and to trace every step of the connexion between 
 them. This however is only possible in an exceed- 
 ingly limited number of cases, and we are in general 
 compelled to have recourse to the other mode in 
 
VI PREFACE. 
 
 which by methods which do not require a detailed 
 knowledge of the mechanism required to produce the 
 phenomena, we show that whatever their explanation 
 may be, they must be related to each other in such 
 a way that the existence of the one involves that 
 of the other. 
 
 It is the object of this book to develop methods 
 of applying general dynamical principles for this 
 purpose. 
 
 The methods I have adopted (of which that used 
 in the first part of the book was suggested by 
 Maxwell's paper on the Electromagnetic Field) make 
 everything depend upon the properties of a single 
 function of quantities fixing the state of the system, a 
 result analogous to that enunciated by M. Massieu 
 and Prof. Willard Gibbs for thermodynamic pheno- 
 mena and applied by the latter in his celebrated paper 
 on the "Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances" 
 to the solution of a large number of problems in 
 thermodynamics. 
 
 I wish in conclusion to thank my friend Mr L. R. 
 Wilberforce, M.A., of Trinity College, for his kindness 
 in correcting the proofs and for the many valuable 
 suggestions he has made while the book was passing 
 through the press. 
 
 J. J. THOMSON. 
 
 TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, 
 May 2nd, 1888. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Preliminary Considerations ........ i 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 The Dynamical Methods to be employed ..... 8 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 Application of these Principles to Physics 16 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 Discussion of the terms in the Lagrangian Function . . -31 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 Reciprocal Relations between Physical Forces when the Systems 
 
 exerting them are in a Steady State 80 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 Effect of Temperature upon the Properties of Bodies ... 89 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 Electromotive Forces due to Differences of Temperature . . 106 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 On " Residual" Effects .... .128 
 
Vlll CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Introductory to the Study of Reversible Scalar Phenomena . .140 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 Calculation of the mean Lagrangian Function . . . -151 
 
 CHAPTER XL 
 Evaporation 158 
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 Properties of Dilute Solutions 1 79 
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 Dissociation 193 
 
 CHAPTER XIV. 
 General Case of Chemical Equilibrium . . . . .215 
 
 CHAPTER XV. 
 
 Effects produced by Alterations in the Physical Conditions on the 
 
 Coefficient of Chemical Combination 233 
 
 CHAPTER XVI. 
 Change of State from Solid to Liquid 243 
 
 CHAPTER XVII. 
 
 The Connexion between Electromotive P'orce and Chemical 
 
 Change 265 
 
 CHAPTER XVIII. 
 Irreversible Effects 281 
 
APPLICATIONS OF DYNAMICS TO 
 PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 
 
 i. IF we consider the principal advances made in the 
 Physical Sciences during the last fifty years, such as the 
 extension of the principle of the Conservation of Energy 
 from Mechanics to Physics, the development of the Kinetic 
 Theory of Gases, the discovery of the Induction of Electric 
 Currents, we shall find that one of their most conspicuous 
 effects has been to intensify the belief that all physical 
 phenomena can be explained by dynamical principles and 
 to stimulate the search for such explanations. 
 
 This belief which is the axiom on which all Modern 
 Physics is founded has been held ever since men first began 
 to reason and speculate about natural phenomena, but, with 
 the remarkable exceptions of its successful application in 
 the Corpuscular and Undulatory Theories of Light, it 
 remained unfruitful until the researches of Davy, Rumford, 
 Joule, Mayer and others showed that the kinetic energy 
 possessed by bodies in visible motion can be very readily 
 converted into heat. Joule moreover proved that whenever 
 this is done the relation between the quantity of kinetic 
 
 T. D. I 
 
2 DYNAMICS. 
 
 energy which disappears and the quantity of heat which 
 appears in consequence is invariable. 
 
 The ready conversion of kinetic energy into heat con- 
 vinced these philosophers that heat itself is kinetic 
 energy; and the invariable relation between the quantities 
 of heat produced and of kinetic energy lost, showed that 
 the principle of the Conservation of Energy, or of Vis- Viva 
 as it was then called, holds in the transformation of heat into 
 kinetic energy and vice versa. 
 
 This discovery soon called attention to the fact that 
 other kinds of energy besides heat and kinetic energy 
 can be very readily converted from one form into another, 
 and this irresistibly suggested the conclusion that the various 
 kinds of energy with which we have to deal in Physics, such 
 for example as heat and electric currents, are really forms of 
 kinetic energy though the moving bodies which are the 
 seat of this energy must be indefinitely small in comparison 
 with the moving pieces of any machine with which we are 
 acquainted. 
 
 These conceptions were developed by several mathema- 
 ticians but especially by v. Helmholtz, who, in his treatise 
 Ueber die Erhaltung der Kraft, Berlin, 1847, applied the 
 dynamical method of the Conservation of Energy to the 
 various branches of physics and showed that by this prin- 
 ciple many well-known phenomena are connected with 
 each other in such a way that the existence of the one 
 involves that of the other. 
 
 2. The case which from its practical importance at first 
 attracted the most attention was that of the transformation 
 of heat into other forms of energy and vice versa. 
 
 In this case it was soon seen that the principle of the 
 Conservation of Energy the First Law of Thermodynamics 
 as it was called was not sufficient to obtain all the relations 
 
PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 3 
 
 existing between the effects of heat on the various pro- 
 perties of a body and the heat produced or absorbed 
 when certain changes take place in the body, but that 
 these relations could be deduced by the help of another 
 principle, the Second Law of Thermodynamics which states 
 that if to a system where all the actions are perfectly rever- 
 sible a quantity of heat dQ be communicated at the absolute 
 temperature 0, then 
 
 r '!- 
 
 the integration being extended over any complete cycle of 
 operations. 
 
 This statement is founded on various axioms by different 
 physicists, thus for example Clausius bases it upon the 
 " axiom" that heat cannot of itself pass from one body to 
 another at a higher temperature, and Sir William Thomson 
 on the " axiom " that it is impossible by means of inanimate 
 material agency to derive mechanical effect from any por- 
 tion of matter by cooling it below the temperature of the 
 coldest of the surrounding objects. 
 
 Thus the Second Law of Thermodynamics is derived 
 from experience and is not a purely dynamical principle. 
 
 We might have expected a priori from dynamical con- 
 siderations that the principle of the Conservation of Energy 
 would not be sufficient by itself to enable us to deduce all 
 the relations which exist between the various properties of 
 bodies. For this principle is rather a dynamical result than 
 a dynamical method and in general is not sufficient by 
 itself to solve completely any dynamical problem. 
 
 Thus we could not expect that for the dynamical treat- 
 ment of Physics the principle of the Conservation of Energy 
 would be sufficient by itself, since it is not so in the much 
 simpler cases which occur in ordinary Mechanics. 
 
4 DYNAMICS. 
 
 The resources of dynamics however are not exhausted 
 even though the principle of the Conservation of Energy has 
 been tried. Fortunately we possess other methods, such as 
 Hamilton's principle of Varying Action and the method of 
 Lagrange's Equations, which hardly require a more detailed 
 knowledge of the structure of the system to which they 
 are applied than the Conservation of Energy itself and yet 
 are capable of completely determining the motion of the 
 system. 
 
 3. The object of the following pages is to endeavour 
 to see what results can be deduced by the aid of these 
 purely dynamical principles without using the Second Law 
 of Thermodynamics. 
 
 The advantages of this method in comparison with that 
 of the two laws of Thermodynamics are 
 
 (1) that it is a dynamical method, and so of a much more 
 fundamental character than that involving the use of the 
 Second Law ; 
 
 (2) that one principle is sufficient instead of two ; 
 
 (3) that the method can be applied to questions in which 
 there are no transformations of other forms of energy from 
 or into heat (except the unavoidable ones due to friction), 
 while for this case the other method degenerates into the 
 principle of the Conservation of Energy, which is often not 
 sufficient to solve the problem. 
 
 The disadvantages of the method on the other hand are 
 that, since the method is a dynamical one, the results are 
 expressed in terms of dynamical quantities, such as energy, 
 momentum, or velocity, and so require further knowledge 
 before we can translate them in terms of the physical 
 quantities we wish to measure, such as intensity of a 
 current, temperature, and so on : a knowledge which in all 
 cases we do not possess. 
 
PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 5 
 
 The Second Law of Thermodynamics, on the other hand, 
 being based on experience does not involve any quantity 
 which cannot be measured in the Physical Laboratory. 
 
 For this reason there are some cases where the Second 
 Law of Thermodynamics leads to more definite results than 
 the dynamical methods of Hamilton or Lagrange. Even 
 here I venture to think the results of the application of the 
 dynamical method will be found interesting, as they show 
 what part of these problems can be solved by dynamics, and 
 what has to be done by considerations which are the results 
 of experience. 
 
 4. Many attempts have been made to show that the 
 Second Law of Thermodynamics is a consequence of the 
 principle of Least Action ; none of these proofs seem quite 
 satisfactory ; but even if the connexion had been proved in 
 an unexceptionable way it would still seem desirable to 
 investigate the results of applying the principle of Least 
 Action, or the equivalent one of Lagrange's Equations, 
 directly to various physical problems. 
 
 If these results agree with those obtained by the use of 
 the Second Law of Thermodynamics, it will be a kind of 
 practical proof of the connexion between this law and the 
 principle of Least Action. 
 
 5. Considering our almost complete ignorance of the 
 structure of the bodies which form most of the dynamical 
 systems with which we have to deal in physics, it might 
 seem a somewhat unpromising undertaking to attempt to 
 apply dynamics to such systems. But we must remember 
 that the object of this application is not to discover the 
 properties of such systems in an altogether a priori fashion, 
 but rather to predict their behaviour under certain circum- 
 stances after having observed it under others. 
 
 A dynamical example may illustrate what the application 
 
DYNAMICS. 
 
 of dynamics to physical problems may be expected to do, 
 and the way in which it is likely to do it. Let us suppose 
 that we have a number of pointers on a dial, and that 
 behind the dial the various pointers are connected by a 
 quantity of mechanism of the nature of which we are 
 entirely ignorant. Then if we move one of the pointers, A 
 say, it may happen that we set another one, B, in motion. 
 
 If now we observe how the velocity and position of B 
 depend on the velocity and position of A, we can by the aid 
 of dynamics foretell the motion of A when the velocity and 
 position of B are assigned, and we can do this even though 
 we are ignorant of the nature of the mechanism connecting 
 the two pointers. Or again we may find that the motion of 
 B when A is assigned depends to some extent upon the 
 velocity and position of a third pointer C : if in this case we 
 observe the effect of the motion of C upon that of A and B 
 we may deduce by dynamics the way in which the motion 
 of C will be affected by the velocities and positions of the 
 pointers A and B. 
 
 This illustrates the way in which dynamical considera- 
 tions may enable us to connect phenomena in* different 
 branches of physics. For the observation of the motion of 
 B when that of A is assigned may be taken to represent the 
 experimental investigation of some phenomenon in Physics, 
 while the deduction by dynamics of the motion of A when 
 that of B is assigned may represent the prediction by the 
 use of Hamilton's or Lagrange's principle of a new phenome- 
 non which is a consequence of the one investigated experi- 
 mentally. 
 
 Thus to take an illustration, suppose we investigate 
 experimentally the effect of a current of electricity both 
 steady and variable upon the torsion of a longitudinally 
 magnetized iron wire along which the current flows, then we 
 
PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS. 7 
 
 can deduce by dynamics the effects of torsion and variations 
 of torsion in the wire upon a current flowing along it. 
 
 The method is really equivalent to an extension and 
 generalization of the principle of the equality of action and 
 reaction, as when we have two bodies A and B acting upon 
 each other if we observe the motion of B which results when 
 A moves in a known way we can deduce by the aid of this 
 principle the motion of A when that of B is known. The 
 more general case which we have to consider in Physics is 
 when instead of two bodies attracting each other we have 
 two phenomena which mutually influence each other. 
 
CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE DYNAMICAL METHODS TO BE EMPLOYED. 
 
 6. As we do not know the nature of the mechanism of 
 the physical systems whose action we wish to investigate, all 
 that we can expect to get by the application of dynamical 
 principles will be relations between various properties of 
 bodies. And to get these we can only use dynamical 
 methods which do not require an intimate knowledge of the 
 system to which they are applied. 
 
 The methods introduced by Hamilton and Lagrange 
 possess this advantage and, as they each make the behaviour 
 of the system depend upon the properties of a single func- 
 tion, they reduce the subject to the determination of this 
 function. In general the way that we are able to connect 
 various physical phenomena is by seeing from the behaviour 
 of the system under certain circumstances that there must be 
 a term of a definite kind in this function, the existence 
 of this term will then often by the application of Lagrangian 
 or Hamiltonian methods point to other phenomena besides 
 the one that led to its detection. 
 
 7. We shall now for convenience of reference collect the 
 dynamical equations which we shall most frequently have to 
 use. 
 
 The most generally useful method is Hamilton's principle 
 
DYNAMICAL METHODS. 9 
 
 of Varying Action according to which (see Routh's Advanced 
 Rigid Dynamics, p. 245) 
 
 where T and V are respectively the kinetic and potential 
 energies of the system, / the time, and q a coordinate of 
 any type. In this case / and /j are each supposed to be 
 constant. 
 
 In some cases it is convenient to use the equation in this 
 form but in others it is more convenient to use Lagrange's 
 Equations, which may be derived from equation (i) (Routh's 
 Advanced Rigid Dynamics, p. 249) and which may be 
 written in the form 
 
 d dL dL - , x 
 
 dtTq-^q-^ (2) " 
 
 where L is written for T- V and is called the Lagrangian 
 function and Q is the external force acting on the system 
 tending to increase q. 
 
 In the preceding equations the kinetic energy is sup- 
 posed to be expressed in terms of the velocities of the 
 coordinates. In many cases however instead of working 
 with the velocities corresponding to all the coordinates it is 
 more convenient to work with the velocities corresponding 
 to some coordinates but with the momenta corresponding to 
 the others. This is especially convenient when some of 
 the coordinates only enter the Lagrangian function through 
 their differential coefficients and do not themselves occur 
 explicitly in this function. In a paper " On some Applica- 
 tions of Dynamical Principles to Physical Phenomena" 
 (Phil. Trans. 1885, Part n.) I have called these "kinos- 
 thenic " coordinates. In the following pages the term 
 "speed coordinates" will for the sake of brevity be used 
 instead wherever it will not lead to ambiguity. 
 
10 DYNAMICS. 
 
 The most important property of such a coordinate is 
 that whenever no external force of its type acts upon the 
 system, the momentum corresponding to it is constant. 
 
 For if x be a speed coordinate, since 
 dL 
 
 * = ' 
 
 we have by Lagrange's equation since no external force 
 acts on the system 
 
 d dL 
 
 as the momentum corresponding to x is dLldy^ this equa- 
 tion shows that it is constant. 
 
 8. Routh {Stability of Motion, p. 61) has given a general 
 method which enables us to use the velocities of some 
 coordinates and the momenta corresponding to the remain- 
 der, and which is applicable whether these latter coordinates 
 are speed coordinates or not. 
 
 The method is as follows : suppose that we wish to use 
 the velocities of the coordinates q^ ^ 2 ...and the momenta 
 corresponding to the coordinates </> n </> 2 ...then Routh has 
 shown that if we use instead of L the new function L given 
 by the equation. 
 
 and eliminate <j> 19 < 2 ...by means of the equations 
 dT dT 
 
 * i '';zr'*-;/r '-** 
 
 #<, d<p 2 
 
 then as far as the coordinates q^ q 2 , are concerned we may 
 use Lagrange's equations if we substitute L' for L. Thus we 
 have a series of equations of the type 
 
 -. 
 
 dt dq dq 
 
DYNAMICAL METHODS. I I 
 
 If we call 
 
 the part of the kinetic energy corresponding to the coordi- 
 nate <j then we see by (4) that L = the kinetic energy of 
 the system minus its potential energy minus twice the kinetic 
 energy corresponding to the coordinates whose velocities are 
 eliminated. 
 
 9. If we do not know the structure of this system all 
 that we can determine by observing its behaviour will be 
 the Lagrangian function or its modified form, and since 
 this function completely determines the motion of the 
 system it is all we require for the investigation of its 
 properties. We see however that when we calculate the 
 'energy" corresponding to any physical condition the in- 
 terpretation may be ambiguous if the energy is not entirely 
 potential. For what we really calculate is the Lagrangian 
 function or its modified form and this is the kinetic energy 
 minus the potential energy minus twice the kinetic energy 
 corresponding to the coordinates whose velocities are elimi- 
 nated. So that the term in the energy which we have cal- 
 culated may be any one of these three things. Thus to 
 take an example, it is said that the energy of a piece of 
 soft iron of unit volume, throughout which the intensity 
 of magnetization is uniform and equal to /, is - / 2 /2/, 
 where k is the coefficient of magnetic induction of the 
 iron, but all that this means is that the term I*j2k occurs 
 in the Lagrangian function (modified or otherwise) of 
 the system whose motion or configuration produces the 
 phenomenon of magnetization. And without further con- 
 siderations we do not know whether this represents an 
 amount of kinetic energy I* 1 2k or potential energy - / 2 /2/, 
 or some kinetic energy corresponding to coordinates whose 
 
12 DYNAMICS. 
 
 velocities have been eliminated, or some combination of all 
 three of these. 
 
 10. This ambiguity however does not occur if we have 
 the system completely mapped out by coordinates, because 
 in this case whenever we find a term in the Lagrangian 
 function it must be expressed in terms of these coordinates 
 and their velocities, or it may be the momenta corresponding 
 to them, and we can tell by inspection whether the term 
 expresses kinetic or potential energy. Two investigations in 
 the second volume of Maxwell's Electricity and Magnetism 
 afford a good illustration of the way in which this ambiguity 
 is cleared away by an increase in the precision of our ideas 
 about the configuration of the system. In the early part of 
 the volume by considering the mechanical forces between two 
 circuits carrying electric currents, it is shown that two such 
 circuits conveying currents /, / possess a quantity of potential 
 energy Mij where J/"is a quantity depending on the shape 
 and size of the two circuits and their relative position. Later 
 on however when coordinates capable of fixing the electrical 
 configuration of the system have been introduced it is shown 
 that the system instead of possessing Mij units of potential 
 energy really possesses + Mij units of kinetic. 
 
 11. The following considerations may be useful as 
 helping to show that this ambiguity is largely verbal and is 
 probably mainly due to our ignorance of what potential 
 energy really is. 
 
 Suppose that we have a system fixed by n coordinates, 
 q^ q 2 ,...q n of the ordinary kind, that is, coordinates which 
 occur explicitly in the expressions for the kinetic or potential 
 energies, and which we shall call positional coordinates, 
 and m kinosthenic or speed coordinates </> l5 < 2 ,...< w . Let 
 us further suppose that there are no terms in the expression 
 for the kinetic energy which involve the product of the 
 
DYNAMICAL METHODS. 13 
 
 velocity of a q and a </> coordinate and that the system has 
 no potential energy. 
 
 Then by Routh's method we can use Lagrange's equation 
 for the q coordinates if instead of the ordinary Lagrangian 
 function L which reduces in this case to the kinetic energy 
 we use the modified function L' given by the equation 
 
 L' = i-^~.. ....................... (6), 
 
 d(f> 
 
 or 
 
 and where <j> lt < 2 are to be eliminated by the aid of the 
 equations 
 
 Thus since the expression for L does not contain any 
 terms involving the product of the velocity of a # and a tf> 
 coordinate, L will be of the form 
 
 T( 99 ) ~ ^W) 
 
 where T {qq} is the kinetic energy arising from the motion of 
 the q or positional coordinates, T^ that arising from the 
 motion of the kinosthenic or speed coordinates. 
 
 By Routh's modification of the Lagrangian equations 
 we have 
 
 but 
 
 so that equation (8) reduces to 
 
 d_ dT (qq} _ dT (99} = _ dTw / v 
 
 dt dq, ' dq, ', dq, 
 
14 DYNAMICS. 
 
 If the system fixed by the positional coordinates q 
 had possessed a quantity of potential energy equal to F, the 
 
 equations of motion would have been of the type, 
 
 * 
 
 _ ._<w) !?!___ . , (IQ). 
 
 dt dq^ dq x dq l 
 
 By comparing equations (9) and (10) we see that the 
 system fixed by the positional coordinates q will behave 
 exactly like a system whose kinetic energy is T (qq] and whose 
 potential energy is T($$) . 
 
 Thus we may look on the potential energy of any system 
 as kinetic energy arising from the motion of systems con- 
 nected with the original system the configurations of these 
 systems being capable of being fixed by kinosthenic or speed 
 coordinates. 
 
 Thus from this point of view all energy is kinetic, and all 
 terms in the Lagrangian function express kinetic energy, the 
 only thing doubtful being whether the kinetic energy is due 
 to the motion of ignored or positional coordinates; this 
 can however be determined at once by inspection. 
 
 12. Some of the theorems in dynamics become very 
 much simpler from this point of view. Let us take for 
 example the principle of Least Action that for the uncon- 
 strained motion of a system whose energy remains constant 
 
 Tdt 
 
 is a minimum from one configuration to another and apply 
 it to the system we have been considering in which all the 
 energy is kinetic but some of it is due to the motion of a 
 system whose configuration can be fixed by kinosthenic 
 coordinates. 
 
 As all the energy is kinetic its magnitude remains 
 constant by the principle of the Conservation of Energy, 
 
DYNAMICAL METHODS. 15 
 
 and so the principle of Least Action takes the very simple 
 form, that with a given quantity of energy any material 
 system will by its unguided motion go along the path which 
 will take it from one configuration to another in the least 
 possible time. The material system must of course include 
 the kinosthenic systems whose motion produces the same 
 effect as the potential energy of the original system ; and 
 two configurations are not supposed to coincide unless the 
 configuration of these kinosthenic systems coincide also. 
 
 This view which regards all potential energy as really 
 kinetic has the advantage of keeping before us the idea 
 that it is one of the objects of Physical Science to explain 
 natural phenomena by means of the properties of matter in 
 motion. When we have done this we have got a complete 
 physical explanation of any phenomenon and any further 
 explanation must be rather metaphysical than physical. It 
 is not so however when we explain the phenomenon as due 
 to changes in the potential energy of the system; for potential 
 energy cannot be said, in the strict sense of the term, to 
 explain anything. It does little more than embody the 
 results of experiments in a form suitable for mathematical 
 investigations. 
 
 The matter whose motion constitutes the kinetic energy 
 of the kinosthenic systems, the " </>" systems, which we regard 
 as the potential energy of the "q" systems, may be either 
 that of parts of the system, or the surrounding ether, or 
 both ; in many cases we should expect it to be mainly the 
 ether. 
 
CHAPTER III. 
 
 APPLICATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES TO PHYSICS. 
 
 13. IN our applications of Dynamics to Physics it will 
 be well to begin with the cases which are the most nearly 
 allied to those we consider in ordinary Rigid Dynamics. 
 Now in this subject when there is no friction all the motions 
 are reversible and are chiefly relations between vector quan- 
 tities. We shall therefore begin by considering reversible 
 vector effects and afterwards go on to reversible effects 
 involving scalar as well as vector relations ; those for 
 example in which a scalar quantity such as temperature is 
 prominently involved : lastly we shall consider irreversible 
 effects. Thus the order in which we shall consider the 
 subject will be 
 
 1. Reversible vector phenomena. 
 
 2. Reversible scalar phenomena. 
 
 3. Irreversible phenomena. 
 
 14. We shall begin by considering the relations between 
 the phenomena in elasticity, electricity, and magnetism and 
 the way in which these depend upon the motion and 
 configuration of the bodies which exhibit the phenomena. 
 
 These phenomena differ from some we shall consider 
 later on in that we have the quantities concerned in them 
 entirely under our control and can by applying proper 
 
COORDINATES. I/ 
 
 external forces make them take any value we please (sub- 
 ject of course to such limitation as the strength of the 
 material and the saturation of magnets may impose). The 
 other phenomena on the other hand depend upon a multi- 
 tude of coordinates over whose individual motion we have 
 no control though we have some over their average motion. 
 As the first kind of phenomena most closely resemble those 
 we have to do with in ordinary dynamics we shall begin 
 with them. 
 
 1 5. The first thing we have to do when we wish to apply 
 dynamical methods to investigate the motion of a system is 
 to choose coordinates which can fix its configuration. 
 
 We shall find it necessary to give a more general 
 meaning to the term "coordinate" than that which obtains 
 in ordinary Rigid Dynamics. There a coordinate is a 
 geometrical quantity helping to fix the geometrical con- 
 figuration of the system. 
 
 In the applications of Dynamics to Physics however, 
 the configurations of the systems we consider have to be fixed, 
 with respect to such things as distributions of electricity and 
 magnetism, for example, as well as geometrically, and to do 
 this we have in the present state of our knowledge to use 
 quantities which are not geometrical. 
 
 Again the coordinates which fix the configurations of the 
 systems in ordinary dynamics are sufficient to fix them 
 completely, while we may feel pretty sure that the coordi- 
 nates which we use to fix the configuration of the system 
 with respect to many of its physical properties, though they 
 may fix it as far as we can observe it, are not sufficient to 
 fix it in every detail ; that is they would not be sufficient 
 to fix it if we had the power of observing differences 
 whose fineness was comparable with that of molecular 
 structure. 
 
 T. D. 2 
 
1 8 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Hydrodynamics furnishes us with many very good illus- 
 trations of this latter point. For example, when a sphere 
 moves through an incompressible fluid, we can express the 
 kinetic energy of the system comprising both sphere and 
 fluid in terms of the differential coefficients of the three 
 coordinates which fix the centre of the sphere, though it 
 would require a practically infinite number of coordinates 
 to fix the configuration of the fluid completely. 
 
 Now Thomson and Tait (Natural Philosophy, vol. I. 
 p. 320) have shown how we can "ignore" these coordinates 
 when the kinetic energy can be expressed without them, and 
 that we may treat the system as if it were fully determined 
 by the coordinates in terms of whose differential coefficients 
 the kinetic energy is expressed. 
 
 And again Larmor (Proceedings of London Mathemati- 
 cal Society, xv. p. 173) has proved that if Z' be Routh's 
 modification of the Lagrangian function, that is q^ q 2 -,-- 
 being the coordinates retained, < < 2 ,... those ignored, (? 
 <2 2 .--, 3> 15 $2 the momenta corresponding to these coordinates 
 respectively, if 
 
 [ * L'dt=o .................. (IT). 
 
 Jt 
 
 then 
 
 t 
 
 If all the kinetic energy vanishes when the positional 
 coordinates q^ ,,... are constant, as is the case when a 
 number of solids move through a perfect fluid in which 
 there is no circulation, Z' is the difference between the 
 kinetic and potential energies of the system. If however 
 the kinetic energy does not vanish when the velocities of 
 the positional coordinates all vanish, as for example when 
 a number of solids are moving through a fluid in which there 
 is circulation, Z' no longer equals the difference between 
 the kinetic and potential energies of the system. 
 
UJNIVERSITS 
 
 COORDINATES. 
 
 It follows from (i i), by the Calculus of Variations, that if 
 L' be expressed in terms of a series of quantities q^ q z ,... 
 and their first differential coefficients, then whatever these 
 quantities may be, we must have a series of equations of the 
 
 type 
 
 d dL' dL' 
 
 Thus we see that we may treat any variable quantities 
 as coordinates if the modified Lagrangian function can be 
 expressed in terms of them and their first differential coeffi- 
 cients. We shall take this as our definition of a coordinate. 
 
 1 6. When we introduce a symbol to fix a physical 
 quantity we may not at first sight be sure whether it is a 
 coordinate or the differential coefficient of one with respect 
 to the time. 
 
 For example, we might feel uncertain whether the symbol 
 representing the intensity of a current was a coordinate or 
 the differential coefficient of one. The simplest dynamical 
 considerations however will enable us to overcome this 
 difficulty. Thus if when there is no dissipation of energy 
 by irreversible processes, the quantity represented by the 
 symbol remains constant under the action of a constant 
 force tending to alter its value, the energy at the same time 
 remaining constant, then the symbol is a coordinate. 
 
 Again, if it remains constant and not zero when no force 
 acts upon it, there being no dissipation and the energy 
 remaining constant, the symbol represents a velocity, that is, 
 the differential coefficient of a coordinate with respect to 
 the time. 
 
 Let us apply these considerations to the example men- 
 tioned above ; as the intensity of a current flowing through 
 a perfect conductor, the only circumstances under which 
 there is no dissipation, does not satisfy the first of these 
 
 2 2 
 
20 DYNAMICS. 
 
 conditions, while it does satisfy the second, we conclude 
 that the intensity of a current ought to be represented by 
 the rate of change of a coordinate and not by the coordinate 
 itself. 
 
 Specification of Coordinates. 
 
 17. To fix the configuration of the system so far as the 
 phenomena we are considering are concerned we shall use 
 the following kinds of coordinates. 
 
 (1) Coordinates to fix the geometrical configuration of 
 the system, i.e. to fix the position in space of any bodies of 
 finite size which may be in the system. For this purpose 
 we shall use the coordinates ordinarily used in Rigid Dy- 
 namics and denote them by the letters x lt x a , x 3 ...; and 
 when we want to denote a geometrical coordinate generally 
 without reference to any one in particular we shall use the 
 letter x. 
 
 (2) Coordinates to fix the configuration of the strains 
 in the system. We shall use for this purpose, as is ordinarily 
 done in treatises on elasticity, the components parallel to 
 the axes of x, y, z of the displacements of any small portion 
 of the body, and denote them by the letters a, (3, y respec- 
 tively. For the strains 
 
 *Y,df*\ fJ: + <ty\ f^^^\ 
 dy + dz) ' \dz + dx) ' \dx + dy) ' 
 
 we shall use the letters e, f, g, a, b, c respectively. It will 
 be convenient to have a letter typifying these quantities 
 generally without reference to any one in particular, we 
 shall use the letter w for this purpose. 
 
 (3) Coordinates to fix the electrical configuration of 
 the system. For this purpose we shall use coordinates 
 
COORDINATES. 2 1 
 
 denoted by the letters y } , y a ..., the typical coordinate 
 being denoted by y, where y in a dielectric is what Maxwell 
 calls an electric displacement, and in a conductor the time 
 integral of a current flowing through some definite area. 
 
 (4) Coordinates to fix the magnetic configuration. We 
 might do this by specifying the intensity of magnetization 
 at each point, but it is clearer 1 think to regard the magnetic 
 configuration as depending, even in the simplest case, upon 
 two coordinates, one of which is a kinosthenic or speed 
 coordinate. 
 
 This way of looking at it brings it into harmony with the 
 two most usual ways of representing the magnetization of a 
 body, viz. Ampere's theory and the hypothesis of Molecular 
 Magnets. 
 
 According to Ampere's theory the magnetization is due 
 to electric currents flowing through perfectly conducting 
 circuits in the molecules of the magnets. In this case the 
 differential coefficient of the kinosthenic coordinate would 
 fix the intensity of the current, and the other coordinate the 
 orientation of the planes of the circuits. 
 
 According to the Molecular Magnet theory, any magnet 
 of finite size is built up of a large number of small magnets 
 arranged in a polarized way. Here the momentum corre- 
 sponding to the kinosthenic or speed coordinate may be 
 regarded as fixing the magnetic moment of a little magnet, 
 which it is well fitted to do by its constancy ; the other co- 
 ordinate may be regarded as fixing the arrangement of the 
 little magnets in space. 
 
 We shall denote the kinosthenic coordinate by and 
 the geometrical one by rj and suppose that they are so 
 chosen that the intensity of magnetization at any point is r?, 
 where is the momentum corresponding to the kinosthenic 
 coordinate . rj is a vector quantity and may be resolved 
 
22 DYNAMICS. 
 
 into three components parallel to the axes of x, y, z respec- 
 tively. 
 
 1 8. Having chosen the coordinates there are two ways 
 in which we may proceed. We may either write down the 
 most general expression for the Lagrangian function in terms 
 of these coordinates and their differential coefficients, and 
 then investigate the physical consequences of each term 
 in this expression. If these consequences are contradicted 
 by experience we conclude that the term we are considering 
 does not exist in the expression for the Lagrangian function. 
 
 Or we may know as the result of experiment that there 
 must be a certain term in the expression for the Lagrangian 
 function and proceed by the application of Lagrange's Equa- 
 tions to develop the consequences of its existence. Thus, for 
 example, we know by considering the amount of work 
 required to establish the electric field that there must be in 
 the Lagrangian function of unit volume of the dielectric a 
 term of the form 
 
 where K is the specific inductive capacity of the dielectric 
 and D the resultant electric displacement. We can then by 
 applying Lagrange's equation to this term see what are the 
 consequences of the specific inductive capacity of the 
 dielectric being altered by strain (see 39). 
 
 We shall make use of both methods but commence with 
 the first as being perhaps the most instructive, and also 
 because we shall have a great many examples of the second 
 method later on since the scalar phenomena do not admit 
 of being treated by the first method. 
 
 19. In using the first method the first thing we have to 
 do is to write down the most general expression for the 
 Lagrangian function in terms of the coordinates #, y, 17, , w. 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION. 23 
 
 Let us suppose that is eliminated by means of the 
 equation 
 
 and that we work with Routh's modification of the Lagran- 
 gian function. 
 
 The most general expression for the terms correspond- 
 ing to the kinetic part of this function, which is the only 
 part we can typify, is of the form 
 
 + 2 (x^X a ) X^ + ...... 
 
 2 + 2 + 
 
 + 2 (xy) xy + 2 (xw) xw + 2 (xrj) xrj 
 + 2 (xg) xg+2 (yw) yw+ 2 (yrj) yrj 
 + 2 (yg) y+ 2 (wrj) wi] + 2 (o/|) a> 
 
 These terms may be divided into fifteen types. 
 
 There are five sets which are quadratic functions of the 
 velocity or momentum corresponding to one kind of coordi- 
 nate. Each of these five sets must exist in actual physical 
 systems if there is anything analogous to inertia in the 
 phenomena which the corresponding coordinates typify. 
 
 Again, there are ten sets of terms of the type 
 
 (xy) xy or (x) x, 
 
 involving the product of two velocities or a velocity and 
 a momentum of two coordinates of different kinds. 
 
 To determine whether any particular term of this type 
 exists or not we must determine what the physical conse- 
 quences of it would be ; if these are found to be contrary 
 to experience we conclude that this term does not exist. 
 
24 DYNAMICS. 
 
 20. We can determine the consequences of the exist- 
 ence of a term of this kind in the expression for the kinetic 
 energy in the following way. 
 
 Let us suppose that we have a term in the modified 
 Lagrangian function of the type 
 
 where/ and q may be any of the five kinds of coordinates we 
 are considering. 
 
 Then we have by Routh's modification of Lagrange's 
 equations 
 
 idL' _dL' _ 
 dt dp ~ ~ 
 
 where P is the external force of type/ acting on the system. 
 Thus the effect of the term 
 
 is equivalent to the existence of a force of the type / equal 
 to 
 
 that is, 
 
 -{(/?) ? + |(/?)? 2 + 2|.(/ ? )^ ...... (14); 
 
 a force of type q equal to 
 
 that is, 
 
 - {(#)/ + | (/?)/+ S^(/ ? )r/} ...... (15); 
 
 and a force of type r equal to 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION. 25 
 
 that is, pq-fc (pq) (16); 
 
 where r is a coordinate of any type other than that of 
 poiq. 
 
 Each of the terms in these expressions would correspond 
 to some physical phenomenon ; and as it is clearer to take a 
 definite case to illustrate this, let us suppose that p is the 
 geometrical coordinate symbolized by x, and q the electrical 
 coordinate y. 
 
 Then if the term (xy) xy occurred in the expression for 
 the Lagrangian function, the mechanical force produced by 
 a steady current would not be the same as that produced by 
 a variable one momentarily of the same intensity. This is 
 so because by the expression (14) there is the term 
 
 (xy)y 
 
 in the expression for the force of type x, that is the 
 mechanical force, and as y is zero if the current is steady, 
 there would be a mechanical force depending on the rate of 
 variation of the current if this term existed. 
 
 Again, we see from the term -=- (xy) y 2 in the expression 
 
 (14), remembering that p stands for x and q for y, that if 
 (xy) were a function of y the current would produce a 
 mechanical force proportional to its square, so that the force 
 would not be reversed if the direction of the current was 
 reversed. 
 
 Or again, if we consider the expression for the force of 
 type y or q t that is the electromotive force, we see that the 
 existence of this term implies the production of an electro- 
 motive force by a body whose velocity is changing, 
 depending upon the acceleration of the body ; this is shown 
 by the existence of the term (xy) x in (15), the expression 
 for the electromotive force. 
 
26 DYNAMICS. 
 
 If (xy) were a function of x, the term (xy) x 2 in (15) 
 shows that a moving body would produce an electromotive 
 force proportional to the square of its velocity, and therefore 
 one that would not be reversed when the direction of motion 
 of the body was reversed. 
 
 As none of these effects have been observed we conclude 
 that this term does not exist in the expression for the 
 Lagrangian function of a physical system (see Maxwell, 
 Electricity and Magnetism, 574). 
 
 21. We shall now go through the various types of terms 
 which involve the product of the velocities of two coordi- 
 nates of different kinds, or a velocity of one kind and the 
 momentum of another, in order to see whether they exist or 
 not in the expression for the Lagrangian function. 
 
 The reasoning to be used is of the same nature as that 
 just given, and we may leave it to the reader to show by the 
 consideration of the expressions (14) and (15) that the 
 existence of the several terms carries with it the con- 
 sequences we describe. 
 
 Taking the terms in order we have 
 
 1. Terms of the form 
 
 (xy) xy. 
 
 We have just seen that terms of this kind cannot exist in 
 the expression for the Lagrangian function. See also Max- 
 well, Electricity and Magnetism, n. part iv. chap. 7. 
 
 2. Terms of the form 
 
 (xw) xw. 
 
 Terms of this form may exist in the case of a vibrating solid 
 body which is also moving as a whole. For the velocity of 
 any point in the solid equals the velocity of the centre of 
 gravity plus the velocity of the point relatively to its centre of 
 gravity. This latter velocity will involve w, so that the 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION. 2/ 
 
 square of the velocity and therefore the kinetic energy may 
 involve xw. 
 
 3. Terms of the form 
 
 (xrj) xri 
 
 cannot exist, for we can prove that they would involve the 
 existence of a magnetizing force in a moving body depend- 
 ing upon the acceleration of the body. It would also require 
 that the mechanical force exerted by a magnet should 
 depend upon the rate of change of the magnetization. 
 None of these effects have been observed. 
 
 4. Terms of the form 
 
 (*) ^ 
 
 apparently do not exist, for they would require that the 
 mechanical force exerted by a magnet should depend upon 
 the rate of variation of the magnetic intensity, and this 
 effect has not been observed. 
 
 5. Terms of the form 
 
 (yw) yu>. 
 
 If these terms existed it would be possible to develop 
 electromotive forces by vibration, and these forces would 
 depend upon the acceleration of the vibration and not 
 merely upon the velocity ; as these have not been observed 
 we conclude that this term does not exist in the Lagrangian 
 function of physical systems. 
 
 6. Terms of the form 
 
 (yn) yn- 
 
 If these terms existed there would be electromotive forces 
 depending upon the rate of acceleration of the changes in 
 the magnetic field. 
 
 They also indicate magnetic forces depending upon the 
 rate of change of the current. As neither of these effects 
 
28 DYNAMICS. 
 
 have been observed we conclude that terms of this form do 
 not exist in the expression for the Lagrangian function. 
 
 7. Terms of the form 
 
 00 # 
 
 Terms of this kind only involve the production of an 
 electromotive force in a varying magnetic field, the electro- 
 motive force varying as the rate of change of the magnetic 
 field. This is the well-known phenomenon of the produc- 
 tion of an electromotive force round a circuit whenever the 
 number of lines of magnetic force passing through it is 
 changed. 
 
 As the term we are considering is the only one in the 
 Lagrangian function which could give rise to an effect of 
 this kind without also giving rise to other effects which have 
 not been verified by experience, we conclude that this term 
 does exist. 
 
 8. Terms of the form 
 
 (wrj) wfi. 
 
 If we take any molecular theory of magnetism, such as 
 Ampere's, where the magnetic field depends upon the 
 arrangement of the molecules of the body, we should rather 
 expect this term to exist. The consequences of its existence 
 have however not been detected by experiments. 
 
 If this term existed, then considering in the first place 
 its effect upon the magnetic configuration we see that a 
 vibrating body should produce magnetic effects depending 
 upon the vibrations. Secondly, considering the effects of 
 this term on the strain configuration we see that there 
 should be a distorting force depending upon the rate of 
 acceleration of the magnetic field. As neither of these 
 effects have been observed there is no evidence of the 
 existence of this term. 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION. 29 
 
 9. Terms of the form 
 
 (wg) w. 
 
 These would involve the existence of distorting forces 
 depending upon the rate of change of the magnetic field, 
 and we have no evidence of any such effect. 
 
 10. Terms of the form 
 
 (of) tf . 
 
 If we assume Ampere's hypothesis of molecule currents this 
 term is of the same nature as the term (xg) xg which we 
 discussed before, so that unless the properties of these 
 molecular circuits differ essentially from those of finite size 
 with which we are acquainted this term cannot exist. 
 
 21. Summing up the results of the foregoing considera- 
 tions, we arrive at the conclusion that the terms in the 
 Lagrangian function which represent the kinetic energy 
 depending upon the five classes of coordinates we are 
 considering must be of one or other of the following types : 
 
 (xx) x 2 
 
 (17). 
 
 (ww) w* 
 
 (m)^ 
 () f 
 
 (xw)xw 
 
 22. We might make a model with five degrees of 
 freedom which would illustrate the connection between 
 these phenomena which are fixed by coordinates of five 
 types. 
 
 And if we arrange the model so that its configuration 
 being defined by the five coordinates x, y, w^ 77, , only 
 those terms which are in the expression (17) shall exist in 
 
3O DYNAMICS. 
 
 the expression for its kinetic energy, and make the potential 
 energy of the model corresponding to each coordinate 
 analogous to that possessed by the physical system, then 
 the working of this model will illustrate the interaction of 
 phenomena in electricity, magnetism, elasticity &c., and any 
 phenomenon exhibited by the model will have its counter- 
 part in the phenomena exhibited in these subjects. 
 
 When however we know the expression for the energy 
 of such a model, there is no necessity to construct it in 
 order to see how it will work, as we can deduce all the rules 
 of working by the application of Lagrange's Equations. 
 And from one .point of view we may look upon the method 
 we are using in this book as that of forming, not a model, 
 but the expression for the Lagrangian function of a model 
 every property of which must correspond to some actual 
 physical phenomenon. 
 
CHAPTER IV. 
 
 DISCUSSION OF THE TERMS IN THE LAGRANGIAN 
 FUNCTION. 
 
 23. WE must now proceed to examine the terms in the 
 expression (17) more in detail, and find what coordinates 
 enter into the various coefficients (xx), (yy) When we 
 have proved that these coefficients involve some particular 
 coordinates we must go on to see what the physical 
 consequences will be. In this way we shall be able to 
 obtain many relations between the phenomena in electri- 
 city, magnetism and elasticity. 
 
 24. The first term we have to consider is {xx} x 2 , which 
 corresponds to the expression for the ordinary kinetic energy 
 of a system of bodies. We know that {xx} may be a function 
 of the geometrical coordinate typified by x, but we need not 
 stop to consider the consequences of this as they are fully 
 developed in treatises on the Dynamics of a System of Rigid 
 Bodies. 
 
 Next {xx} may involve the electrical coordinate y, for 
 in a paper "On the Effects produced by the Motion of 
 Electrified Bodies," Phil. Mag. Apr. 1881, I have shown 
 that the kinetic energy of a small sphere of mass m charged 
 
32 DYNAMICS. 
 
 with a quantity of electricity e and moving with a velocity v 
 
 
 15 a 
 
 where a is the radius of the sphere and /u, the magnetic 
 permeability of the dielectric surrounding it. 
 
 The existence in the kinetic energy of this term, which is 
 due to the "displacement currents" started in the surrounding 
 dielectric by the motion of the electrification on the sphere, 
 shows that electricity behaves in some respects very much 
 as if it had mass. For we see by the expression (18) that 
 the kinetic energy of an electrified sphere is the same as 
 if the mass of the body had been increased by 4fjLe 2 /i$a. 
 
 Thus whenever a moving body receives a charge of 
 electricity its velocity will be impulsively changed, for the 
 momentum will remain constant, and as the apparent mass 
 is suddenly increased the velocity must be impulsively 
 diminished. 
 
 The apparent increase in mass cannot exceed a very 
 small quantity because air or any other dielectric breaks 
 down when the electric force gets very intense. If we take 
 75 as the intensity in electrostatic measure in C.G.S. units of 
 the greatest electric force which a fairly thick layer of air 
 can stand, which is the value given by Dr Macfarlane (Phil. 
 Mag., Dec. 1880), we have, since the electric force at the 
 surface of the sphere must be less than 75, 
 
 K being the specific inductive capacity of the medium. 
 
 So that the ratio of the increase in mass to the original 
 mass, which by (18) is equal to 
 
 15 a 
 
ELECTRIFIED SPHERES. 33 
 
 cannot exceed K* 1500 
 
 and since in air i / ^K= 9 x io 2 
 
 we see that the ratio cannot exceed 
 
 i . 6 x icT 18 a 3 /m, 
 
 or about 4 x io~ 19 /p, 
 
 where p is the mean density of the substance enclosed by the 
 electrified surface. 
 
 Thus the alteration in mass, even if the mean density 
 inside the surface is as small as that of air at the atmospheric 
 pressure and oC., is only about 5 x io~ 16 of the original 
 mass, and is much too small to be observed. 
 
 Let us now consider the electrical effects of this term. 
 
 Let Q be the electromotive force acting on the sphere. 
 The energy of the system, using the same notation as before, 
 is 
 
 1 2 u<A i e 2 
 
 - m + v~ H ^ . 
 
 2 15 # / 2 Ka 
 
 If v be increased by v and e by 8e, the increment in the 
 energy is 
 
 4 fA 2 \ 4 y^ 2 o, $ 
 
 1 5 a ) 1 5 # Ka ' 
 
 and by the Conservation of Energy this must equal 
 so that 
 
 / 4 fu? s 
 [m+. - 
 \ 15 a 
 
 15 a ) 15 a Ka 
 
 Since no mechanical force acts upon the system the 
 momentum will be constant, so that 
 
 w *MS ^ / \ 
 
 ') H vbe=o (20). 
 
 15 a J 15 a 
 
 T. D. 3 
 
34 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Eliminating v and Be between equations (19) and (20) we 
 find 
 
 So that the capacity of the sphere is increased in the 
 ratio of i to i / i -- '- ^Kv 2 , or since according to the 
 
 Electromagnetic Theory of Light ^K- i/F 2 where V is the 
 velocity of light through the dielectric, the capacity of the 
 
 sphere is increased in the ratio of i to i i ------- ^ , Thus 
 
 15 V* 
 
 the capacity of a condenser in motion will not be the same 
 as that of the same condenser at rest, but as the difference 
 depends on the square of the ratio of the velocity of the 
 condenser to the velocity of light it will be exceedingly 
 small. 
 
 If the earth does not carry the ether with it, a point on 
 the earth's surface will be moving relatively to the ether, and 
 the alterations in the velocity of such a point which occur 
 during the day will produce a small diurnal variation in the 
 capacities of condensers. 
 
 25. When we have two spheres of radius a and a 
 moving with velocities v and v respectively the kinetic 
 energy (see the paper on the " Effects produced by the 
 Motion of Electrified Bodies," Phil. Mag., April, 1881), 
 assuming Maxwell's theory, is 
 
 e cos e 
 
 Ki 2 /A A 2 / 1 , 2 /A/ S \ /2 
 
 -m+ r }v +(-m+- r -^}v 2 + 
 2 15 a ) \2 15 a J 
 
 where R is the distance between the centres of the two 
 spheres and e the angle between their directions of motion ; 
 m, m, e, e are respectively the masses and charges of the 
 spheres. 
 
ELECTRIFIED SPHERES. 35 
 
 By expressing v 9 v and cos c in terms of the coordinates 
 of the centres of the spheres and their differential coefficients 
 with respect to the time, we can, by using Lagrange's 
 equations in the way explained in 20, show that these terms 
 require the existence of the following forces on the two 
 spheres, v and v being the accelerations of the spheres 
 respectively. 
 
 On the first sphere. 
 
 a. An attraction 
 
 u^e' 
 
 = vv cos e 
 
 3^~ 
 
 along the line joining the centres of the spheres. 
 /?. A force 
 
 in the direction opposite to the acceleration of the second 
 sphere. 
 
 y. A force 
 
 i , , d 
 3 ^ et c ' dt 
 
 in the direction opposite to the direction of motion of the 
 second sphere. 
 
 There are corresponding forces on the second sphere, and 
 we see that unless the two spheres move with equal and 
 uniform velocities in the same direction the forces on the 
 two spheres are not equal and opposite. The sum of the 
 momenta of the two spheres will not increase indefinitely 
 however, since the sum of the actions and reactions is not 
 constant but is a function of the accelerations. 
 
 We may easily prove that if x, y, z are the coordinates of 
 the centre of one sphere, x, y', z' those of the other, then 
 | 4 ne* /jiee' \ dx ( , 4 />u?' 2 /A ee' \ dx' 
 
36 DYNAMICS. 
 
 is constant, along with symmetrical expressions for the y and 
 z coordinates. 
 
 26. Other electrical theories besides Maxwell's lead to 
 the conclusion that the coefficient [xx] is a function of the 
 electrification of the system. 
 
 Thus according to Clausius' theory (Crelle, 82, p. 85) 
 the forces between two small electrified bodies in motion are 
 the same as if, using the same notation as before, there was 
 the term 
 
 , cos e ee' 
 
 in the expression for the Lagrangian function. The first of 
 these is the same as the term we have just been considering. 
 The forces which according to Weber's theory (Abhand- 
 limgen der Koniglich Sdchsischen Gesellschaft der Wissen- 
 schaften, 1846, p. 211. Maxwell's Electricity and Magnetism, 
 2nd Edit. vol. n. 853) exist between two electrified bodies 
 in motion may easily be shown to be the same as those 
 which would exist if in the Lagrangian function there was 
 the term 
 
 ee'(x-x' .. y-y , z z' .. Y ee 
 
 (U - U') (v - ,<) + __._ (W _ ,) _ _ , 
 
 -g __._ 
 
 where x, y, z, x, /, z' are the coordinates of the centres of 
 the electrified bodies and w, v, w, u', v', w' the components 
 of their velocities parallel to the axes of coordinates. 
 
 This term leads however to inadmissible results, as we 
 can see by taking the simple case when the bodies are moving 
 in the same straight line which we may take as the axis of 
 x. In this case the term in the kinetic energy reduces to 
 
 ee' 
 
 or -- (u* -2?tu'+ u' 2 ) 
 
 K 
 
ELECTRIFIED SPHERES. 37 
 
 so that the electrified bodies will behave as if their masses 
 were in consequence of the electrification increased by 
 zeelR since the coefficients of u* and it' 2 are each increased 
 by half this amount. Hence if we take e and / of opposite 
 signs and suppose the electrifications are great enough to 
 make zee'lR greater than the masses of one or both of the 
 bodies, then one of the bodies at least will behave as if its 
 mass were negative. This is so contrary to experience that 
 we conclude the theory cannot be right. This consequence 
 of Weber's theory was first pointed out by v. Helmholtz 
 ( Wissenschaftliche Abhandlnngen, i. p. 647). 
 
 The forces which according to Riemann's theory, given 
 in his posthumous work Schwere, Elektricitdt und Magnetis- 
 mus, p. 326, exist between two moving electrified bodies may 
 easily be shown to be the same as those which would exist if 
 there were the term 
 
 in the expression for the Lagrangian function. We can 
 easily see that this theory is open to the same objection 
 as Weber's, that is, it would make an electrified body 
 behave in some cases as if its mass were negative. 
 
 27. If we regard the expression for the kinetic energy 
 from the point of view of its bearing on electrical phenomena 
 we shall see that it shows that if we connect the terminals 
 of a battery to two spheres made of conducting material, the 
 quantity of electricity on the spheres will depend upon their 
 velocities. 
 
 We see from the expression (22) for the kinetic energy of 
 a moving conductor that if we have a number of conductors 
 moving about in the electric field there will be a positive term 
 in the Lagrangian function depending upon the square of 
 the electrification. And the same is true to a smaller 
 
38 DYNAMICS. 
 
 extent if the moving bodies are not conductors but 
 substances whose specific inductive capacity differs from 
 that of the surrounding medium. This is equivalent to a 
 decrease in the potential energy produced by a given 
 electrification, since an increase in the potential energy 
 corresponds to a decrease in the Lagrangian function. 
 Thus the presence of the moving conductors is equivalent 
 to a diminution in the stiffness of the dielectric with respect 
 to alterations in its state of electrification. And therefore 
 the speed with which electrical oscillations are propagated 
 across any medium will be diminished by the presence of 
 molecules moving about in it ; the diminution being pro- 
 portional to the square of the ratio of the velocity of the 
 molecules to the velocity with which light is propagated 
 across the medium. Thus if the electromagnetic theory of 
 light is true the result we have been discussing has an 
 important bearing on the effect of the molecules of matter 
 on the rate of propagation of light. 
 
 28. We can see that {xx} may be a function of the 
 strain coordinates, for let us take the case when {xx} is the 
 moment of inertia of a bar about an axis through its centre : 
 then it is evident if the bar be compressed in the middle 
 and pulled out at the ends that the moment of inertia will 
 be less than if the bar were unstrained, for the effect of 
 the strain has practically been to bring the matter forming 
 the bar nearer to the axis. Thus the moment of inertia 
 and therefore {xx} may depend upon the strain coordinates. 
 
 These coordinates will in general only enter {xx} through 
 the expression for the alteration in the density of the strained 
 
 body, i.e. through 
 
 da dB dy 
 
 +-+-/- (23), 
 
 dx dy dz 
 
 and this will only enter {xx} linearly. 
 
ELECTRIC CURRENTS. 39 
 
 If we form the equations of elasticity by using Hamilton's 
 principle 
 
 3 (T- V) dt = o 
 
 Jta 
 
 \ve shall easily find that the presence of (23) in {xx} 
 leads to the introduction of the so-called "centrifugal forces" 
 into the equation of elasticity for a rotating elastic solid. 
 This however we shall leave as an exercise for the reader. 
 
 29. Let us now consider that part of the Lagrangian 
 function which depends upon the velocities of the electrical 
 coordinates, i.e. the part denoted by 
 
 Let us take the case of two conducting circuits whose 
 electrical configuration is fixed by the coordinates y } , y 2 , 
 where j,, j> 2 are the currents flowing through the circuits 
 respectively. 
 
 This part of the Lagrangian function may in this case be 
 conveniently written 
 
 Now we can fix the geometrical configuration of the two 
 circuits if we have coordinates which can fix the position 
 of the centre of gravity and the shape and situation of the 
 first circuit, the shape of the second circuit and its position 
 relatively to the first. 
 
 Let us denote by x 2 - x l any coordinate which helps to 
 fix the position of one circuit relatively to the other, and by 
 ,, 2 coordinates helping to fix the shape of the first and 
 second circuits respectively. 
 
 It is evident that the kinetic energy must be expressible 
 in terms of these coordinates, for the only coordinates neces- 
 sary to fix the system which we have omitted are those fixing 
 the centre of gravity and situation of the first circuit, and 
 
40 DYNAMICS. 
 
 since a motion of the whole system as a rigid body through 
 space cannot alter this part of the kinetic energy of the 
 system, the expression for the kinetic energy cannot involve 
 these coordinates. 
 
 If we write for a moment x instead of x z - x l (a coordi- 
 nate helping to fix the position of one circuit relatively to 
 the other) then by Lagrange's Equations we see that these 
 terms in the kinetic energy correspond to the existence of a 
 force tending to increase x equal to 
 
 i dL . dM . i dN . 
 
 --X (24) - 
 
 We see from this expression that dLldx, and dNIdx 
 must vanish, otherwise there would be a force between the 
 two circuits even though the current in one of them 
 vanished. The quantities L and N are by definition the 
 coefficients of self-induction of the two circuits, and hence 
 we see that the coefficient of the self-induction of a circuit is 
 independent of the position of other circuits in its neighbour- 
 hood and is therefore the same as if these circuits were re- 
 moved 1 . 
 
 By (16) the force tending to increase x is 
 dM . . 
 
 that is there is a force between the two circuits proportional 
 to the product of the currents flowing through them, and also 
 to the differential coefficient with respect to the coordinate 
 along which the force is reckoned of a function which does 
 not involve the electrical coordinates. This corresponds 
 exactly to the mechanical forces which are actually observed 
 
 1 This is quite consistent with the apparent diminution in the self- 
 induction caused by a neighbouring circuit when an alternating current 
 is used. 
 
ELECTRIC CURRENTS. 4! 
 
 between the circuits, and a little consideration will show that 
 these forces could not arise from any other terms in the 
 Lagrangian function. Thus the consideration of the mechan- 
 ical forces which two circuits carrying currents are known to 
 exert upon each other proves that the term My\y 2 exists in 
 the expression for the Lagrangian function. 
 
 Let us now go on to consider the effect of these terms 
 on the electrical configuration of the two circuits. 
 
 By Lagrange's Equation for the coordinate^, we have 
 
 d dL 1 dL' 
 
 where Y } is the external electromotive force tending to 
 increase y^. Now as we shall prove directly dL'\dy\ = o, so 
 that the effects on the electrical configuration of the first 
 circuit, arising from the term 
 
 are the same as would be produced by an external electro- 
 motive force tending to increase y } equal to 
 
 -~(l^ + My,) ..................... (26). 
 
 Thus if any of the four quantities Z, M, j\, y. 2 vary in 
 value there is an electromotive force acting round the 
 circuit through which the current jy, flows. And the 
 expression (26) gives the E. M. F. produced either by the 
 motion of neighbouring circuits conveying currents or by 
 alterations in the magnitudes of the currents flowing through 
 the circuits. 
 
 This example is given in Maxwell's Electricity and 
 Magnetism, vol. n. part iv. chapter vi., and it is one -which 
 illustrates the power of the dynamical method very well. 
 The existence of the mechanical force shows that there is 
 
42 DYNAMICS, 
 
 the term 
 
 My* y 
 
 in the expression for the Lagrangian function and then the 
 law of the induction of currents follows at once by the 
 application of Lagrange's Equations. 
 
 The problem we have just been considering is dynamic- 
 ally equivalent to finding the equations of motion of a 
 particle with two degrees of freedom when under the action 
 of any forces. We know that these cannot be deduced by 
 the aid of the principle of the Conservation of Energy alone, 
 for to take the simplest case of all, that in which no forces 
 act upon the particle, the principle of the Conservation of 
 Energy is satisfied if the velocity is constant whether the 
 particle moves in a straight line or not. From this analogy 
 we see that when we have two circuits the principle of the 
 Conservation of Energy is not sufficient to deduce the 
 equations of motion, and that some other principle must be 
 assumed implicitly in those proofs which profess to deduce 
 these equations by means of the Conservation of Energy 
 alone. 
 
 30. There is no experimental evidence to show that 
 {yy} is a function of the electrical coodinates y, and it 
 certainly is not when the electrical systems consist of a 
 series of conducting circuits, for if it were the coefficients of 
 self and mutual induction would depend upon the length of 
 time the currents had been flowing through the circuits. 
 And in any case it would require the existence of electro- 
 motive forces which would not be reversed if the direction 
 of all the electric displacements in the field were re- 
 versed. 
 
 31. Similar reasoning will show that {yy} cannot be a 
 function of the magnetic coordinates, for if it were there 
 would be magnetic forces produced by electric currents 
 
EFFECT OF STRAIN. 43 
 
 which would not be reversed if the directions of all the 
 currents in the field were reversed. 
 
 32. We- must now consider whether {yy} is a function 
 of the strain coordinates or not. If it is then the coefficients 
 of self and mutual induction of a number of circuits must 
 depend upon the state of strain of the wires forming the 
 circuits. This result though not impossible has never been 
 detected, and it is contrary to Ampere's hypothesis that the 
 force exerted by a current depends only upon its strength 
 and position and not upon the nature or state of the 
 material through which it flows. 
 
 Then again, if we consider what the effect on the elastic 
 properties of the substance would be if {yy} were a function 
 of the strain coordinates, we see at once that it would 
 indicate that the elastic properties of a wire would be 
 altered while an electric current was passing through it. 
 
 The evidence of various experimenters on this point is 
 somewhat conflicting. Both Wertheim (Ann. de Chim. et 
 de Phys. [3] 12, p. 610, Wiedemann's Elektricitcit, n. p. 403) 
 and Tomlinson have observed that the elasticity of a wire is 
 diminished when a current passes through it and that this 
 diminution is not due to the heat generated by the current. 
 Streintz ( Wien. Ber. [2] 67, p. 323, Wiedemann's Elektrititat, 
 n. p. 404) on the other hand was unable to detect any such 
 effect. 
 
 But even if this effect were indisputably established it 
 would not prove rigorously that {yy} is a function of the 
 strain coordinates, for as we shall endeavour to show when 
 we consider electrical resistance this effect might have been 
 due to another cause. 
 
 To sum up we see that {yy} is a function of the 
 geometrical coordinates but not of the electric or magnetic 
 ones and probably not of the strain ones. 
 
44 DYNAMICS. 
 
 33. We shall now consider the part of the Lagrangian 
 function which depends upon the magnetic coordinates and 
 which does not involve the velocities of the geometrical, 
 electrical or strain coordinates. Thus the terms we are 
 about to consider in the Lagrangian function of unit 
 volume of a substance are those we have denoted by 
 
 we may have in addition to these terms arising from the 
 potential energy. 
 
 In order to begin with as simple a case as possible let 
 us suppose that all the magnetic changes take place indefi- 
 nitely slowly ; in this case we may neglect the term 
 
 and confine our attention to the terms 
 
 ijgtf'+jtfte 
 
 or as it is more convenient to write them 
 
 (27). 
 
 Let us take first the case when the magnetization is 
 parallel to one of the axes, x for example, and let us denote 
 the magnetic force parallel to this direction by H and the 
 intensity of magnetization by /, where by definition 
 
 /=irf ........................ (28). 
 
 The investigation in 389 of Maxwell's Electricity and 
 Magnetism shows that if we suppose that all the energy in 
 the magnetic field is resident in the magnets, there is in the 
 Lagrangian function for unit volume of a magnet the term 
 
 HI. 
 
 The result of this investigation is stated in the Electricity 
 
MAGNETIZATION. 45 
 
 and Magnetism to be that the potential energy of unit 
 
 volume of the magnet is 
 
 -HI, 
 
 but we have seen in 9 that the question whether energy 
 determined in this manner is kinetic or potential is really 
 left unsettled : what is actually proved is that a certain term 
 exists in the Lagrangian function. 
 
 If we suppose that the energy is distributed throughout 
 the whole of the magnetic field, including unmagnetized 
 substances as well as magnets, then the investigation in 635 
 of the Electricity and Magnetism shows that the Lagrangian 
 function of unit volume anywhere in the magnetic field con- 
 tains the term 
 
 _ 
 
 where B is the magnetic induction. 
 
 These two ways of regarding the energy in the magnetic 
 field lead to identical results ; and as we shall for the 
 present confine our attention to the magnetized substances 
 we shall find it more convenient to adopt the first method 
 of looking at the question. 
 
 We have seen that the Lagrangian function for unit 
 volume of a magnet contains the term 
 
 HI, 
 or in our notation 
 
 and this is the term we previously denoted by 
 
 Mflfc 
 
 Since the magnetic changes are supposed to take place 
 indefinitely slowly, Lagrange's equation for the >? coordinate 
 reduces to 
 
46 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Applying this to the expression (27) and substituting 
 for i {} we get 
 
 ^=o ............... (30), 
 
 and since is supposed to remain constant and therefore 
 
 &fy=*r/, 
 
 this may be written 
 
 + H = o ............... (31). 
 
 So that if k be the coefficient of magnetic induction and 
 defined by the equation 
 
 I 
 we have by (31) 
 
 -/; 
 
 and therefore 
 
 (33). 
 
 If we know the way in which 7 varies with H we could 
 by this equation express A as a function of /. The relation 
 between / and H is however in general so complicated that 
 there seems but little advantage to be gained by taking some 
 empirical formula which connects the two and determining 
 A by its help. 
 
 For small values of H, Lord Rayleigh (Phil. Mag. 23, 
 p. 225, 1887) has shown that II H is constant, so by 
 equation (33) A in this case is also constant. 
 
 34. The mechanical force parallel to the axis of x 
 acting on unit volume of the magnet is 
 
 dIJ 
 
MAGNETIZATION. 47 
 
 The only quantity in the terms we are considering which 
 involves x explicitly is J7, so that dL'Idx reduces to 
 
 ,dH 
 *-fc 
 
 T dH 
 or I -^ (34), 
 
 and this is the mechanical force parallel to the axis of x 
 acting on unit volume of the magnet. This expression may 
 also be written 
 
 1 , dH* 
 
 - k j 
 
 2 ax 
 
 with similar expressions for the components parallel to the 
 axes ofy and z. 
 
 These are the same expressions for this force as those 
 given in Maxwell's Electricity and Magnetism, vol. IT. p. 70, 
 the consequences of which are as is well known in harmony 
 with Faraday's investigations on the way in which para- 
 magnetic and diamagnetic bodies move when placed in a 
 variable magnetic field. 
 
 35. We have just investigated the mechanical forces 
 produced by a magnetic field ; we shall now proceed to 
 investigate some of the stresses produced by it. 
 
 Let us take the case of a cylindrical bar of soft iron 
 whose axis coincides with the axis of x, and suppose that it 
 is magnetized along its axis. Let e, /, g be the dilatations 
 of the bar parallel to the axes of x, y, z respectively. We 
 shall at present assume that there is no torsion in the bar. 
 We shall suppose that the changes in the strains take place 
 so slowly that we may neglect the kinetic energy arising 
 from them. 
 
 The- potential energy due to these strains is 
 
 }* + \n {e 2 +/ 2 +/ - 2ef- 2eg - 2/g\, 
 
48 DYNAMICS. 
 
 where n is the coefficient of rigidity and m - ;//3 the 
 modulus of compression. 
 
 Thus the terms in the Lagrangian function involving the 
 magnetic and strain coordinates are 
 
 - \m (e +/+ g} 2 - \n (e 2 +f 2 + g 2 - 2ef- 2eg 
 
 neglecting those depending on the rate of variation of these 
 quantities which rate we shall assume to be indefinitely small. 
 The experiments of Villari and Sir William Thomson 
 (Wiedemann's Elektricitdt, in. p. 701) have shown that k 
 depends upon the strain in the magnet, hence by equation 
 (32) A will be a function of the strains. We shall pro- 
 ceed to investigate the stresses which arise in consequence 
 of this. Using the Hamiltonian principle 
 
 and substituting da-ldx, dfi/dy, dyfdz for e, /, g respectively, 
 we get the following equations by equating to zero the 
 variation caused by changing a into a + Sa 
 
 dL d dL 
 
 -dx-dx-de =Q > ................... (35) 
 
 inside the bar, 
 
 dL 
 
 at the boundary. 
 
 By equating to zero the variation caused by changing ft 
 into ft + 8/3 we get 
 
 dL d dL 
 
 inside the bar, 
 
 dL 
 
 at the boundary. 
 
STRAIN AND MAGNETIZATION. 49 
 
 And by equating to zero the variation caused by changing 
 y into y + By we get 
 
 dL d dL 
 
 - = (39) 
 
 inside the bar ; 
 
 at the boundary. 
 
 The first and second terms in the equations (35), (37) 
 and (39) may conveniently be considered separately. Since 
 H is the only quantity in the expression for L which can 
 involve the coordinates x, y, or z explicitly the terms 
 
 dL dL dL 
 dx ' dy ' dz 
 reduce to 
 
 ^dH .dH .dH 
 
 ^ ^ 
 
 or kH ,-, kH -y- , 
 
 dx dy dz 
 
 respectively. 
 
 These are the expressions for the components of the 
 mechanical force acting on the body, and it is shown in 
 Maxwell's Electricity and Magnetism, 642, that this dis- 
 tribution of force would strain the body in the same way as 
 "a hydrostatic pressure H 2 j%ir combined with a tension 
 BHI^T? along the lines of force," B being the magnetic 
 induction. Thus we may suppose that the strains arising 
 from these terms are known. If e, f, g are the strains due 
 to the second term in equations (35) (37) and (39), we have 
 
 T. D. 4 
 
DYNAMICS. 
 
 
 if? -y-m(' +f+g) - n (f-e-g) = o 
 
 dA 
 if? -- - m (e+f+g] -n(g-e-f) = o 
 
 -.(41). 
 
 Solving these equations and putting r; = / we get 
 
 2** = -^-4 (AF) -^T n {^( A ^ 2 ) + ^ (4J 2 )} 
 
 _m^n_(d a r J 
 
 $mn {de x ' dg ^ ' ) 
 
 2m 
 
 2Jlg = 
 
 2m d 
 
 m-n (d 
 
 dg 
 d 
 
 \ 
 
 / x 
 (42). 
 
 and 
 
 If the magnet is symmetrical about its axis we have 
 */ / , ^ 
 
 So that equations (42) reduce to 
 m i T 
 
 ne = 
 
 3;^ n de 
 
 -n df 
 
 \ .-.(43). 
 
 - n df 
 
 The dilatation e + zf is equal to 
 
 3;^ - 11 (de ' df 
 
 Differentiating equations (43) with regard to / 2 , we get 
 
 approximately since ^ (AI 2 ) and -^.(AI 2 ) must be 
 
 small compared with m or n, or the changes in the 
 elasticity caused by magnetization would not be so small 
 as to have escaped detection, 
 
STRAIN AND MAGNETIZATION. 51 
 
 de m d d m-n d d 
 
 ^ ' ' ( 
 
 ' 
 
 _ m-n 
 
 ^ ' ^ ' ' \ ( 
 
 ' 
 
 df m-n d d tjr^.n + nd d (AP\\ 
 ~dl^~Z^-n de dl* ( ' + -^n JfTP^ ' } J 
 Now by equation (32) 
 
 So that these equations become 
 
 de m i dk m-n i dk 
 
 dl* ~ yn-nk* de yn-n k 2 df , . . 
 
 df _ m-n i dk m + n i dk \ 
 
 Now if the coefficient of magnetization depends upon 
 the strains, the intensity of magnetization of the bar 
 when under the action of a constant magnetizing force 
 will be altered by strain, and in order to compare the 
 formulae with the results of experiments we shall find it 
 more convenient to express defd! 2 , dfldl* in terms of the 
 changes which take place in the intensity of magnetization 
 when the bar is stretched rather than in terms of dk'de 
 and dkjdf. 
 
 We have /=//, 
 
 so that when H is supposed to be constant 
 dl r^dk r - r dk dl 
 
 and equations (46) may be written 
 
 de _/ dk\f m i dl m-n i dl\ 1 
 
 * dl* \ di)\yn-nklde yn-nkl d/)\ , ox 
 
 , , . ,, , T i-r r (4w 
 
 df (IT "k\ ( tn n \ dl m + n i dl\ 
 
 dl 2 \ dl )\ yn n kl de yn n kl df) j 
 These expressions give the strains which result from the 
 dependence of the intensity of magnetization on the state 
 
 42 
 
52 DYNAMICS. 
 
 of strain of the magnetized body. In addition there are 
 the strains arising from Maxwell's distribution of stress. 
 Kirchhoff (Wied. Ann. xxiv. p. 52, xxv. p. 601) has 
 investigated the effect of this on a small soft iron sphere 
 placed in a uniform magnetic field and has shown that it 
 would produce an elongation of the sphere along the lines 
 of force and a contraction at right angles to them. We may 
 therefore assume that in general this distribution of stress 
 causes an expansion of the magnet in the direction of the 
 lines of force and a contraction in all directions perpen- 
 dicular to this. 
 
 The expressions for the strains in a magnetizable 
 substance placed in the magnetic field have also been in- 
 vestigated by v. Helmholtz (Wied. Ann. xin. p. 385). The 
 object of the investigations of v. Helmholtz and Kirchhoff 
 was rather different from that of Maxwell. Maxwell's object 
 was to show that his distribution of stress would produce 
 the same forces between magnetized bodies as those which 
 are observed in the magnetic field, while v. Helmholtz and 
 Kirchhoff's object was to show that it follows from the prin- 
 ciple of the Conservation of Energy that, whatever theory 
 of electricity and magnetism we assume, the bodies in the 
 electric or magnetic field must be strained as if they were 
 acted upon by a certain distribution of stress which in the 
 simplest case is the same as that given by Maxwell. 
 
 We have in addition to the strain produced by these 
 stresses, the strains depending upon the alteration of the 
 intensity of magnetization with stress along and perpen- 
 dicular to the lines of force. 
 
 The effect of stress along the lines of force on the 
 magnetization of iron has been investigated by Villari (Pogg. 
 Ann. 126, p. 87, 1868) and Sir William Thomson (Proc. 
 Roy. Soc. 27, p. 439, 1878) ; both these physicists found that 
 
STRAIN AND MAGNETIZATION. 53 
 
 the intensity of magnetization was increased by stretching 
 when the magnetizing force was small, but that when the 
 magnetization exceeds about 10 when measured in C.G.S. units 
 the intensity of magnetization is diminished by stretching. 
 
 Sir William Thomson also investigated the effect of 
 stress at right angles to the lines of magnetic force on 
 the intensity of magnetization and found that this was in 
 general opposite to that of tension along the lines of force, 
 so that for small values of the magnetizing force extension 
 at right angles to the lines of force diminishes the mag- 
 netization, while for larger values of this force it increases 
 it. The critical value of the force in this case however is 
 higher than that for tension along the lines of force. 
 
 Thus, except when the magnetizing force is between the 
 critical values, dljde and dlldf have opposite signs, hence 
 we see by equation (48) that except in this case, since 
 Prof. Ewing's measurements show that Hdkldl is always 
 less than unity, 
 
 de , dl 
 dP and de 
 have the same sign, and 
 
 df 
 
 have opposite signs. 
 
 Now dllde is positive or negative according as the 
 magnetizing force is less or greater than the critical value, 
 so that when the magnetizing force is less than the critical 
 value the extension we are investigating will increase with 
 the magnetic force, but when the magnetizing force is 
 greater than this value the extension will diminish as the 
 force increases. 
 
 As we mentioned before the strain produced by Maxwell's 
 distribution of stress, which is the other cause tending to 
 
54 DYNAMICS. 
 
 strain the body, has been shown by Kirchhoff to produce 
 an expansion along the lines of force and a contraction at 
 right angles to them. Thus when the magnetizing force is 
 less than the critical value this strain and the strain we have 
 just investigated act in the same way, but when the force is 
 greater they act in opposite directions. 
 
 Joule's investigations (Phil. Mag. 30, pp. 76, 225, 1847) 
 prove that the length of an iron bar increases when it 
 is magnetized and as far as the experiments went the 
 increase in the length was proportional to the square of the 
 magnetizing force. Mr Shelford Bidwell (Proc. Roy. Soc. 
 XL. p. 109) however has lately shown that when the mag- 
 netizing force is very large the magnet shortens as the 
 magnetizing force increases. 
 
 Comparing these experimental results with our theoretical 
 conclusions we see that they are in accordance when the 
 magnetizing force is small, and that when the magnetizing 
 force is large they indicate that the strains due to the same 
 cause as that which causes the intensity of magnetization to 
 alter with strains are more powerful than those arising from 
 Maxwell's distribution of stress. Prof. Ewing's experiments 
 on the effect of strain on magnetization (" Experimental 
 Researches in Magnetism," Phil. Trans. 1885, part n. p. 
 585) would seem to show that this must be the case. For 
 Kirchhoff (Wiedemann's Annalen, xxv. p. 60 1) has shown 
 that the greatest increase in length which Maxwell's stresses 
 can produce in a soft iron sphere whose radius is R, placed 
 in a uniform magnetic field where the force at an infinite 
 distance from the sphere is H, is 
 
 '53 H* R 
 
 I 7 67T E 
 
 where E is one of the constants of elasticity for soft iron 
 and is equal in the c. G. s. system of units to r8x io 12 . 
 
STRAIN AND MAGNETIZATION. 55 
 
 Thus in this case supposing k to be constant we have 
 de i53 i 
 
 1- 
 
 Now according to Prof. E wing's experiments the intensity 
 of magnetization of a soft iron wire which was represented by 
 181 when there was no load was increased to 237 when the 
 wire was loaded with a kilogramme, so that in this case 
 
 87 i 
 
 7 = -.--nearly ............ (50). 
 
 The diameter of the wire was such that the load of a 
 kilogramme corresponded to a stress of about 2 x io 8 per 
 square centimetre in C.G.S. units, so that if q be Young's 
 modulus for the wire and Se the extension produced by the 
 load 
 
 q^e = 2 x i o 8 : 
 
 for wrought iron q\n is about 2-5, so that 
 
 nBe 8 x io 7 
 and therefore by (49) 
 
 \_dl__ i 
 nl de 2 '4 x io 8 ' 
 
 so that by equation (48) if e be the elongation due to the 
 magnetization 
 
 de i i , , 
 
 <// 8> 7xio 8 l " 
 
 Comparing this with (49) we see that the part of de\dl* due 
 to the cause we are now considering is very much greater 
 than that due to Maxwell's distribution of stress. The value 
 of dl\de is probably exceptionally large in this case, and 
 near the critical value it is doubtless very much less, so that 
 in this case it is conceivable that the effect of the Maxwell 
 
5 6 DYNAMICS. 
 
 stress may be comparable with that due to the alteration of 
 intensity of magnetization with strain. 
 
 Since the Maxwell effect is in general so small compared 
 with the other we should expect the critical value of the 
 magnetizing force to be approximately the same as the 
 value of the force when the extension is a minimum ; it is 
 however much less. There seems however to be reason 
 to think that the critical value when the magnet is free 
 from strain has been very much underestimated. Indeed 
 Prof. Ewing (loc. tit.) expresses his opinion that "if we 
 deal only with very small stresses it is doubtful whether 
 any reversal of the positive effect of stress would be 
 reached even at the highest obtainable value of the magneti- 
 zation." By the positive effect of stress Prof. Ewing means 
 an increase of magnetization with an increase of stress, the 
 magnetizing force remaining constant. 
 
 Bid well's discovery that dejdl* is negative when the 
 magnetization exceeds a certain value, in conjunction with 
 the theoretical results we have been investigating in this 
 paragraph, shows that when the magnetization reaches this 
 value the positive effects of stress must be reversed. The 
 magnet in this case however is not free from stresses as it is 
 acted on by those called into play by the magnetization. 
 
 36. If the dilatation in volume e + 2/ be denoted by 8, 
 then the part of 8 due to the same cause as that which 
 makes the intensity of magnetization depend upon strain is 
 by (48) given by the equation 
 
 </8 _ i j_ fdT_ a 
 dl*~ yn-n kl \de * 2 ~i 
 
 Joule's experiments show that the dilatation in the 
 volume if it exists at all must be very small compared with 
 the elongation, as he was not able to detect it though his 
 
STRAIN AND MAGNETIZATION. 57 
 
 apparatus would have enabled him to do so if it had 
 amounted to one part in 4500000. Hence as the greater 
 part of the strain is that given by equation (48) 
 
 dl dl_ 
 
 de df 
 
 must be small, so that dl\de and dl\df must have opposite 
 signs except when they are very small. This agrees with 
 the results of Sir William Thomson's experiments on the 
 effects of traction along and perpendicular to the lines of 
 force on the intensity of magnetization ; as, except in the 
 neighbourhood of the critical magnetic forces when dllde 
 and dlldf are both small, traction along and perpendicular 
 to the lines of force produced opposite results. 
 
 If we assume that Joule's experiments prove that there 
 is no change in volume then by equation (52) 
 
 dl_ dl_ 
 
 de + 2 df ~ 
 
 and equation (48) reduces to 
 de i dl 
 
 37. The critical value of the intensity of magnetization, 
 i.e. the intensity when the magnetization is neither increased 
 nor decreased by a small strain will, since by (32) and (47) 
 
 d d , ,, , . 
 (54), 
 
 be given by the equation 
 
 * In my paper on " Some Applications of Dynamics to Physical 
 Phenomena," Part I. Phil. Trans. Part II. 1885 this equation has the 
 wrong sign, which was carried down from equation (51) in the same 
 paper. 
 
58 DYNAMICS. 
 
 The experiments of Sir William Thomson and Prof. Ewing 
 have shown that the critical value of / depends upon the 
 state of strain. Hence we see by means of equation (55) that 
 dAlde must be a function of e, so that if A be expanded in 
 powers of e it must contain powers about the first. We may 
 therefore write 
 
 A = a + fie + ye* + $e s + ... 
 
 Now if the term ye 2 exists, the coefficient of e 2 in the 
 Lagrangian function will contain the term \yP and so will 
 involve the state of magnetization of the body. The 
 coefficients of elasticity however are linear functions of the 
 coefficient of e 2 in the Lagrangian function so that if this 
 latter quantity depends upon the state of magnetization, the 
 coefficients of elasticity will do the same. We conclude 
 therefore that the elasticity of an iron bar must be altered by 
 magnetization. This effect does not seem to have been 
 observed. 
 
 If in the expression for A we neglect powers above the 
 second we have 
 
 = + 2 e 
 de 
 
 and therefore 
 
 The right hand side of this equation changes sign when 
 e passes through the value 
 
 Now the effects of strain on the intensity of magnetization 
 and of magnetization upon strain depend by (32) and (47) 
 upon the value of, 
 
TORSION AND MAGNETIZATION. 59 
 
 so that we should expect the effect of magnetization on the 
 strain of an iron rod to depend upon the strain previously 
 existing in the rod, in such a way that when the strain was 
 less than a critical value magnetization would increase the 
 length of the rod, and when it was greater than this value 
 magnetization would have the contrary effect and tend to 
 shorten the rod. This agrees with the result of Joule's 
 experiments as he found that when the soft iron wires were 
 stretched beyond a certain limit they became shorter instead 
 of longer when they were magnetized. 
 
 38. So far we have only considered the effect of expan- 
 sion and contraction upon the intensity of magnetization 
 and vice-versa. We can however in a similar way discuss 
 the effects of torsion upon the magnetic properties of iron 
 wire. 
 
 Let us now suppose that twist is the only strain in an iron 
 wire which is longitudinally magnetized and has a twist c 
 about its axis, then, using the same notation as before, the 
 terms in the Lagrangian function depending upon strain 
 and magnetization are 
 
 By a similar method to that employed in the case of 
 dilatations we can prove that the twist c due to the same 
 cause as that which makes the intensity of magnetization 
 alter with the torsion is given by the equation 
 
 ............... (53). 
 
 Now when a twisted bar is magnetized it untwists to 
 a certain extent if the magnetization is intense, but the twist 
 increases if the magnetization is weak. If however the bar 
 
60 DYNAMICS. 
 
 initially has no twist in it then it neither twists nor untwists 
 when it is magnetized (Wiedemann's Elektricitat, in. p. 692). 
 
 This shows that if A be expanded in powers of c the 
 first power must be absent, otherwise by equation (58) an 
 untwisted bar would twist when it was magnetized. Hence 
 A must contain a term in c and therefore the coefficient of 
 c 2 in the Lagrangian function must contain a term proportional 
 to I 2 . Now the coefficient of <? in the Lagrangian function 
 is proportional to the coefficient of rigidity and hence we see 
 that the rigidity of iron wire will be altered by magnetization. 
 
 Since the twist diminishes with strong magnetization we 
 see by equation (58) that the coefficient of <: in 
 
 - d (AP\ 
 n "dc dl* (AJ > 
 
 must be negative when / is large and hence that the co- 
 efficient of in A must be negative. Let us call this 
 coefficient /, the coefficient of c 2 in the Lagrangian 
 function is 
 
 . 
 
 but the apparent coefficient of rigidity is twice the coefficient 
 of - f in the Lagrangian function so that in this case the 
 apparent coefficient of rigidity is 
 
 Thus in this case the effect of strong magnetization is to 
 increase the rigidity, so that the same couple will not twist 
 the wire as much when it is strongly magnetized as when it 
 is unmagnetized. 
 
 When the intensity of magnetization is small the opposite 
 will be the case, as in this case the twist in a wire increases 
 when it is longitudinally magnetized. 
 
 Since =- 
 
TORSION AND MAGNETIZATION. 6l 
 
 and by (47) 
 and also 
 
 we have 
 
 dc 
 
 -JTT - - -j* < = r- r -J- \--T 
 
 dl \ 11 dc v ' } nkl dc \ dc 
 
 or approximately since d*(AI z )lndc 2 is very small 
 dc i dl / __ ^\ 
 
 ............ (6o) " 
 
 We see by this equation that when the magnetization is 
 so strong that magnetizing the wire diminishes the twist in 
 it, then twisting the wire will diminish the intensity of 
 magnetization. On the other hand when the intensity of 
 magnetization is so small that magnetizing the wire increases 
 the twist in it then twisting the wire will increase the 
 intensity of magnetization. 
 
 The reciprocal relations between torsion and magnetiza- 
 tion have been experimentally investigated by Wiedemann 
 (Lehre von der Elektriritat, in. p. 692) and he arranges 
 the corresponding results in parallel columns. These are 
 also quoted in Prof. Chrystal's article on Magnetism in the 
 Encyclopedia Britannica. The following is one set of the 
 corresponding statements. 
 
 " 5. If a wire under the influence of a twisting strain is 
 magnetized, the twist increases with weak but diminishes 
 with strong magnetization." 
 
 "V. If a bar under the influence of a longitudinal 
 magnetizing force is twisted the magnetization increases 
 with small twists but decreases with large ones." 
 
 Comparing these statements with the results we have 
 previously obtained we see that whether the first part of V is 
 
62 DYNAMICS. 
 
 true or not depends upon the intensity of magnetization. If 
 the twist be of such a magnitude that 5 is true, then the first 
 part of V is true if the magnetization is weak, but the opposite 
 is true if the magnetization is strong. Further since by V 
 the influence of twist on magnetization depends upon the 
 size of the twist, it follows by equation (60) that the influence 
 of magnetization upon twist must depend upon the size of 
 the twist so that 5 is only true when the twist is on one 
 side of a critical value, when it is on the other side the 
 contrary is true. 
 
 The existence of a critical twist as well as a critical 
 magnetization makes the verbal enunciation of the relations 
 between torsion and magnetization cumbrous; they are all 
 however expressed by equation (60). 
 
 39. Strains in a dielectric produced by the 
 electric field. The strains produced in a dielectric by 
 the electric field can be found by a method so similar to 
 that used in the last two paragraphs that we shall consider 
 them here though they have no connexion with the terms in 
 the Lagrangian function which we have been considering. 
 
 Let/, , r be the electric displacements parallel to the 
 axes of x t y, z respectively, then if the body is isotropic, the 
 terms in the Lagrangian function of unit volume of the 
 dielectric which depend upon the coordinates fixing the 
 strains and electric configuration if the dielectric is free 
 from torsion are, 
 
 where e, /, g are the dilatations parallel to the axes of x, y, z 
 respectively, ^Tthe specific inductive capacity of the dielectric 
 and X, Y, Z the electromotive forces parallel to the axes 
 
STRAIN AND MAGNETIZATION. 63 
 
 of x t y, z. Then we see as in 35 that e,f, g the strains due 
 to the dependence of K upon the strains in the dielectric 
 are given by the equations 
 
 = - Z = o ~ = o 
 
 where L stands for the expression (61). 
 
 Substituting for L its value these equations become re- 
 spectively 
 
 27r{/ 2 + q* + r 2 } ^ ~ 4- ;// (e +/+ g) + n (e -f-g) - o 
 
 n (f-. e -X\ = Q v. (62). 
 
 \*/ 3 / / \ / 
 
 Now / = KX, q=~ KY, r = -~ KZ. 
 
 47r 4?r 4?r 
 
 So that if R 2 =X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 , 
 
 we get from equations (62) 
 
 dK , x (dK . dK\\ 
 de 
 
 , . ,, . 
 
 -(m-n) (-^. + -- )\ -..(63) 
 \df dgj) 
 
 with symmetrical expressions for g and //. 
 The expansion in volume 
 
 is given by the equation 
 
 dK dK 
 
 Just as in the analogous case of magnetism these are 
 not the only strains produced in the dielectric by the 
 electric field. The term (Xp + Yq + Zr) which occurs in 
 the Lagrangian function can be shown to involve the same 
 
64 DYNAMICS. 
 
 distribution of strain in the dielectric as would be produced 
 by the distribution of stress which Maxwell supposes to 
 exist in the electric field, viz. a tension KR 2 !^ along the 
 lines of force and a pressure of the same intensity at right 
 angles to them. The effect of this distribution of stress 
 will be of the same character for all dielectrics, and its 
 nature depends more upon the distribution of force 
 throughout the electric field than upon the nature of the 
 dielectric. The experiments of Quincke (Phil. Mag. x. p. 
 30, 1880) and others show that the behaviour of different 
 dielectrics when placed in the same electric field is very 
 different. Thus, for example, though most dielectrics 
 expand when placed in an electric field, the fatty oils on 
 the contrary contract. This difference of behaviour shows 
 that in many cases at any rate, the strains due to the same 
 cause as that which makes the specific inductive capacity 
 depend upon the strain are greater than those produced by 
 Maxwell's distribution of stress. 
 
 Quincke has shown that the coefficients of elasticity of a 
 dielectric are altered when an electric displacement is pro- 
 duced in it, this shows that \IK when expanded in powers 
 of e must contain a term in e z and is another proof that 
 the specific inductive capacity depends upon the strain in 
 the dielectric. Since part of the strain of a dielectric in an 
 electric field is due to the same cause as that which makes 
 the specific inductive capacity depend upon strain, the 
 expression for i/^when expanded in powers of e must con- 
 tain the first power of the strains as well as the second, as if 
 it only contained the second powers placing the dielectric 
 in an electric field would merely be equivalent to changing 
 the coefficients of elasticity of the body and so could not 
 strain the body if it were previously free from strain. 
 
 No experiments seem to have been made to determine 
 
MAGNETIC INERTIA. 65 
 
 directly the values of dKlde, dK/df&c., and the experimen- 
 tal difficulties which would have to be overcome in order to 
 do this are much greater than those in the corresponding 
 case in magnetism. The dependence of K upon strain is 
 probably much less than that of /, the coefficient of 
 magnetic induction. For the specific inductive capacity 
 seems to be much more independent of the molecular state 
 of the dielectric than the coefficient of magnetic induction 
 is of the molecular state of soft iron. Thus there is a com- 
 paratively small difference between the specific inductive 
 capacities of various substances, while the coefficient of 
 magnetic induction of iron is enormously greater than that 
 of any other substance. Again, the coefficient of magnetic 
 induction is known to be much affected by changes in 
 temperature; while some recent experiments made by Mr 
 Cassie in the Cavendish Laboratory have shown that the 
 effect of changes of temperature on the specific inductive 
 capacities of ebonite, mica and glass is small, amount- 
 ing in the case of glass, for which it is largest, to i part in 
 400 for each degree centigrade of temperature. No experi- 
 ments seem to have been made on the effect of torsion on 
 electrification or of electrification upon torsion. 
 
 40. Influence of inertia on magnetic pheno- 
 mena. In the preceding investigations we have supposed 
 the magnetic changes to take place so slowly that the 
 effects of inertia may be neglected. If however a change in 
 the magnetization involves, as it does according to all 
 molecular theories of magnetism, motion of the molecules 
 of the magnet, then magnetism must behave as if it possessed 
 inertia. 
 
 In soft iron and steel the conditions are made so com- 
 plex by the effects of magnetic friction, magnetic retentive- 
 ness and permanent magnetism, that it would be difficult to 
 
 T.D. 5 
 
66 DYNAMICS. 
 
 disentangle the effects of inertia proper from other compli- 
 cations. The effect, if it exists, would probably be detected 
 most easily in the case of crystals, as only one of these, 
 quartz, has ever been suspected of showing residual mag- 
 netism (see Tumlirz, Wied. Ann. xxvn. p. 133, 1886). The 
 effect of inertia would be to introduce into the equations 
 of magnetization a term 
 
 as** 1 
 
 M w* 
 
 where / is the intensity of magnetization. The equations 
 of magnetization would therefore be of the form 
 
 where 77 is the external magnetic force. 
 
 If ffis periodic and varies as e ipt then by (65) 
 
 (60, 
 
 so that if/ be so large that kMp 2 >i, the crystal if para- 
 magnetic for a steady magnetic force will be diamagnetic for 
 a variable one and vice versa. 
 
 Changes of this kind could be detected very readily if 
 the crystal were freely suspended in the magnetic field, for 
 when / 2 passed through the value \lkM the crystal would 
 swing through a right angle. 
 
 41. The term (y) y in the Lagrangian func- 
 tion. We have considered the terms depending upon the 
 squares of the velocities of the electrical coordinates, and 
 those depending solely on the magnetic coordinates, let us 
 now consider those terms in the expression for the kinetic 
 energy which involve the product of the velocities of a mag- 
 netic and an electrical coordinate. 
 
 It is proved in Maxwell's Electricity and Magnetism 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 6/ 
 
 { 634) that when a current whose components are #, v, w 
 flows through the element of volume dxdydz and the volume 
 dxdy'dz' is magnetized to the intensities A, B, C parallel to 
 the axes of x, y, z respectively, then the kinetic energy L 
 possessed by the system is 
 
 where / is the reciprocal of the distance between the 
 elements dxdydz and dx'dy'dz. 
 
 Now we represent the intensity of magnetization by 
 TJ where is the momentum corresponding to a kinosthenic 
 or speed coordinate and rj is a vector quantity. 
 
 Since rj is a vector quantity it may be resolved into com- 
 ponents parallel to the axes of x, y, z. Let us denote these 
 components by X, //,, v respectively, then we may put 
 
 Making this substitution we have 
 
 . v f\ +v ( v ^. x ^ 
 
 dz' dy } \ dx' dz 
 
 So that these terms are of the form 
 
 Considering the Lagrangian Equation for the electrical 
 coordinate, we see that there is an electromotive force 
 parallel to the axis of x on the element dxdydz equal to 
 
 dtdu 9 
 
 52 
 
68 DYNAMICS. 
 
 so that, per unit volume, this force equals 
 
 -'*{*%- c 
 
 with corresponding expressions for the electromotive forces 
 parallel to the axes of y and z. 
 
 These are the usual expressions for the electromotive 
 forces due to the variations of the magnetic field. 
 
 The magnetic force parallel to x acting on the element 
 dx'dy'dz' is by 33 equal to 
 
 idL 
 d\ 
 
 so that the magnetic force parallel to x per unit volume 
 is equal to 
 
 * -*** ............... (7o)> 
 
 with similar expressions for the magnetic forces parallel to 
 the axes of y and z. These expressions agree with those 
 given by Ampere for the magnetic force produced by a 
 system of currents. 
 
 Again there is a mechanical force acting on the element 
 dxdydz whose component parallel to the axis of x is 
 
 d_L 
 Jx' 
 If we call 
 
 . 
 
 G, H respectively, then F, G, H are the same as the 
 
MECHANICAL FORCE DUE TO A CURRENT. 69 
 
 quantities denoted by the same symbols in Maxwell's 
 Electricity and Magnetism. 
 
 Since the force on the element dxdydz is 
 dL 
 dx' 
 we see that the force on unit volume may be written 
 
 dF dG dH 
 
 U -- + v -j + W r- , 
 dx dx dx 
 
 or 
 (dG dF\ (dF dH\ dF dF dF 
 
 V\ . -j- \-W \-j } + U -j- + V-j- + W- r ...( f J2\ 
 
 {dx dy } {dz dx } dx dy dz w 
 
 This differs from Maxwell's expression for the same force 
 by the term 
 
 dF dF dF 
 
 U +V -j- +W -T-. 
 
 dx dy dz 
 
 du dv dw 
 
 Since -j- + -j- + --j- = o 
 
 ax ay dz 
 
 it follows that 
 
 MdF dF dF\ , 
 u +v -j- +w ^ ) dxdydz = o 
 dx dy dz) 
 
 if all the circuits are closed. So that as long as the circuits 
 are closed the effect of the translator}' forces is the same as 
 if they were given by Maxwell's expressions. 
 
 In the above investigation we have assumed that we 
 could move the element without altering the current ; if we 
 suppose the current to move with the elements we shall get 
 Maxwell's expression exactly. 
 
 The components parallel to y and z of the force on the ele- 
 ment dxdydz are given by expressions corresponding to (72). 
 
 The force parallel to x on the magnetized volume 
 Jx'dy'dz', is 
 
 *L 
 
 dx' 
 
7O DYNAMICS. 
 
 so that the force parallel to oc per unit volume is 
 
 with corresponding expressions for the forces parallel to y 
 and z. 
 
 Thus the force on the magnet is equal and opposite to 
 that on the current. 
 
 We see by this example how from the existence of a 
 single term in the expression for L we can deduce the laws 
 of the induction of currents, the production of a magnetic 
 field by a current, the mechanical force on a current in a 
 magnetic field and the mechanical force on a magnet placed 
 near a current. 
 
 42. Twist in a magnetized iron wire produced 
 by a current. Prof. G. Wiedemann (Elektricitat, in. 
 p. 689) has shown that when a current flows along a longi- 
 tudinally magnetized wire, it produces a couple tending to 
 twist the wire. This shows that there must be a term in the 
 Lagrangian function for the wire of the form 
 
 /*rf ........................ (74), 
 
 where y is the current flowing along the wire, >; the intensity 
 of magnetization /, and c the twist about the axis of the 
 wire,/(<:) being some function of c. Applying Hamilton's 
 principle to this term we see that it indicates the existence 
 of a couple tending to twist the wire equal to 
 
 >l ........................ (75). 
 
 Applying Lagrange's equation for the ^coordinate to this 
 term we see that since the electromotive force tending to 
 
TORSION AND MAGNETIZATION. 7 1 
 
 increase y is 
 
 <L dL 
 
 dtdy* 
 
 the existence of this term shows that there is an electro- 
 motive force along the wire equal to 
 
 that is -J t {f(f}1} ..................... (?6) ' 
 
 Thus twisting a longitudinally magnetized iron wire must 
 produce an electromotive force which lasts as long as the 
 twist is changing, and any alteration in the longitudinal 
 magnetization of a twisted iron wire must produce one lasting 
 as long as the magnetization changes. Hence Faraday's rule 
 that the electromotive force round the circuit due to induc- 
 tion equals the rate of diminution in the number of lines of 
 force passing through it, will not apply to the case of a twisted 
 iron wire, for we might get an electromotive force round a 
 circuit made of such a wire by moving it in the plane of 
 the magnetic force, and in this case there is no alteration in 
 the number of lines of force passing through the circuit. 
 
 The production of an electromotive force by twisting 
 a longitudinally magnetized iron wire has been experi- 
 mentally verified. 
 
 Again, if we consider Lagrange's equations for the 
 coordinates fixing the magnetic configuration, since any term 
 in the Lagrangian function indicates an effect similar to 
 that which would be produced by an external magnetic force 
 equal to 
 
 we see that the term we are considering indicates the 
 
72 DYNAMICS. 
 
 existence of a magnetizing force on the wire equal to 
 
 /y ........................ (77) 
 
 tending to magnetize it longitudinally. So that if a current 
 of electricity passes along a twisted wire or if a wire 
 conveying a current of electricity be twisted the wire will be 
 longitudinally magnetized. These effects have been ob- 
 served by Prof. G. Wiedemann (Elektriritat, in. p. 692). 
 
 43. Hall's phenomenon. The terms we are con- 
 sidering, involving both the electric and magnetic coordinates, 
 are also interesting from their connexion with Hall's phe- 
 nomenon, for as we shall see directly this phenomenon 
 indicates the existence in the Lagrangian function of terms 
 of this kind. Hall discovered (Phil. Mag. x. 301,) that 
 when currents are flowing through a conductor placed in a 
 magnetic field, there is an electromotive force due to the 
 field even though it remains constant, and that this electro- 
 motive force at any point is parallel and proportional to the 
 mechanical force acting on the conductor conveying the 
 current at that point. Thus the electromotive force is at 
 right angles both to the direction of the current and the 
 magnetic induction, and its components parallel to the axes 
 of x, y, z are respectively given by the expressions 
 
 where C' is a constant depending upon the nature of the 
 medium through which the current is flowing, a, /?, y are 
 the components of the magnetic force and /, g, h are the 
 components of the electric displacement if the medium is a 
 dielectric, if the medium is a conductor /, g, h are the 
 components of the electric current 
 
HALL EFFECT. 73 
 
 Prof. Fitzgerald ("On the Electromagnetic Theory of 
 the Reflection and Refraction of Light," Phil. Trans. 
 1880, Part ii.) and Mr Glazebrook (Phil. Mag. XL p. 397, 
 1881) have shown that the existence of this force proves 
 that there is a term equal to 
 
 KM/te-/M)+^-y/M(/3/-?)} .-.(78) 
 
 in the expression for the Lagrangian function of unit 
 volume of the medium. 
 
 Let us consider the Lagrangian equation for the electric 
 displacement/. It indicates the existence of an electromo- 
 tive force parallel to the axis of x equal to 
 _d_dL L dL 
 -~dt~tf + ~df 
 or in this case 
 
 C'(P/i-yg) + kC(yg-ph) (79). 
 
 The first of these terms corresponds to the Hall effect, 
 the second to an electromotive force tending to displace the 
 lines of electrostatic force. 
 
 This latter force is at right angles both to the direction 
 of electric displacement and to that in which the change in 
 the magnetic force is greatest ; the magnitude of the force 
 is 
 
 \C'HD sin (9, 
 
 where D is the resultant electrostatic displacement, H the 
 rate of change of the magnetic force and the angle 
 between the electric displacement and the direction in 
 which the change in the magnetic force is greatest. 
 
 If P be the original electromotive force then since the 
 Hall electromotive force is very small we have approximately 
 
 where K is the specific inductive capacity of the medium. 
 
74 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Thus the ratio of the disturbing force we are considering to 
 the original electromotive force is 
 
 ~ C'KHsm 6. 
 
 07T 
 
 Now Hall's experiments show that C in electromagnetic 
 measure is at most of order io~ 5 ; and K is of the order io~ 31 
 so that the ratio of the disturbing force to the original force 
 is of the order 
 
 io- 27 H sin 0, 
 
 and is thus much too small for there to be any chance of its 
 detection by experiment. 
 
 We see too from the expression for this force that it 
 absolutely vanishes when both the electric displacement and 
 the magnetic force are stationary, and these were the con- 
 ditions when Hall tried unsuccessfully to detect the existence 
 of his effect in an insulator (Phil. Mag. x. p. 304, 1880.) 
 
 Let us now consider Hall's effect from the point of view 
 of magnetic instead of electromotive force. Perhaps the 
 easiest way to do this will be to suppose that the magnetic 
 forces are produced by an element of volume dx'dy'dz' 
 magnetized to intensities A, B, C parallel to the axes of 
 x, y, z respectively. If O is the magnetic potential of this 
 element at a distance r, then, for a point outside the magnet 
 
 and 
 
 -- + JS~+C- dx'dy'dz' ... 
 dxr dy r dz r 
 
 Substituting these values for a, /?, y in the expression (78) 
 we see that there is a term in the Lagrangian function equal 
 to 
 
HALL EFFECT. 75- 
 
 dxdy'dz'. 
 If as on page (67) we put 
 
 ^ = ^X; ^ = 6*; CWv 
 
 the magnetic force on the element dx'dy'dz' parallel to the 
 axis of x will be 
 
 idL 
 
 so that in this case the magnetic force parallel to x per unit 
 
 volume is 
 
 if. d a i d* i - d z i~| 
 
 or if 
 
 then the magnetic force at the points #', y, / parallel to the 
 axis of x due to the electric displacements /, g, h through 
 unit volume at the point (xyz) is 
 
 similarly the magnetic forces parallel to y and z are 
 
 respectively. 
 
76 DYNAMICS. 
 
 If we have electric displacements distributed throughout 
 a volume of any size, then the components of the magnetic 
 force parallel to the axes of x t y, z due to the same cause 
 as that which produces Hall's effect are 
 d* d* d* 
 dx' ' dy ' dz' 
 respectively, where 
 
 * = SS5tdxdydz .................. (85), 
 
 the integration being extended over the volume throughout 
 which there are electric displacements. 
 
 If the point at which we wish to find the magnetic force 
 is inside the volume occupied by the electric displacements 
 we must modify the preceding results. Let us suppose that 
 we have a small sphere whose centre is at the point where 
 we require the magnetic force, magnetized to the intensities 
 A, B, C parallel to the axes of x, y, z respectively. Then 
 inside the sphere 
 
 ' So that the Lagrangian function for an element of volume 
 dxdydz inside the sphere is 
 
 1 C ^ {A (gh-gh) + B (hf- hf) + C (fg -fg)} dxdydz, 
 
 hence the components of the magnetic force due to the 
 electric displacement at the point where the force is measured 
 
 are 
 
 %*C f (gh-gh), 
 
 So that the general expression for the components of the 
 magnetic force due to the cause producing the Hall effect 
 are 
 
HALL EFFECT. 
 
 77 
 
 -, - 
 
 + f *C' (hf- hf) 
 
 (86), 
 
 where /, g, h are the components of the electric displace- 
 ment at the point where the magnetic force is measured and 
 ^ is given by equation (81). Since C r is a very small 
 quantity, as are also / g, h, these forces will be very small, 
 and it is only when f, g, h vary very rapidly that we could 
 expect to have any chance of detecting them. We shall 
 therefore calculate the magnitude of these forces when the 
 electric displacement changes with the greatest rapidity we 
 can produce in an experiment. This if the Electromagnetic 
 Theory of Light is true will be when the electric displace- 
 ments are those which accompany the propagation of light. 
 Let us suppose that we have a circularly polarized ray 
 travelling along the axis of z and that the electric displace- 
 ments are given by the equations 
 
 (87), 
 
 / 27r / , \ 
 
 /= w cos (vt - z) 
 
 A 
 
 27r / J. \ 
 g = w sm (vt z) 
 
 A 
 
 where w is the amplitude of the oscillation, X the wave length 
 and v the velocity of propagation of light. 
 Substituting these values we see 
 
 hf-hf=o 
 
 fg-fg=-*^-\ 
 
 ,(88). 
 
78 DYNAMICS. 
 
 If we consider a long cylindrical beam of light 
 # = o 
 
 and thus by equation (86) the circularly polarized ray 
 produces a magnetic force in the direction along which it is 
 propagated equal to 
 
 we can deduce the value of w for strong sunlight from 
 the data given in Maxwell's Electricity and Magnetism, Vol. 
 ii. 793. The maximum electromotive force in this case 
 is given as 
 
 6 x io 7 
 
 in electromagnetic measure, the maximum value w, of the 
 displacement corresponding to this is 
 
 47T 
 
 or 
 
 2TTV* 
 
 Assuming the wave length to be 6 x io~ 5 , which is a little 
 greater than that of the D line and C to be io~ 5 , we see 
 that the magnetic force produced by circularly polarized 
 light as intense as strong sunlight cannot be greater than 
 
 2 x io~ 18 , 
 
 which is much too small to be detected by experiments. 
 
 The direction of the magnetic force is related to the 
 direction of rotation of the electric displacement in a 
 circularly polarized ray like translation and rotation in a 
 left-handed screw. 
 
 Prof. Rowland has shown (Phil. Mag. Apr. 1881) that the 
 Hall effect if it existed in transparent bodies (which with the 
 
HALL EFFECT. 79 
 
 exception of electrolytes are all insulators) would account for 
 the rotation of the plane of polarization of light passing 
 through such bodies placed in a magnetic field in which the 
 lines of magnetic force are more or less parallel to the 
 direction of propagation of the light. In this case by the 
 aid of an external magnetic force we rotate the plane of 
 polarization ; in the case we have just investigated, which 
 may be looked upon as the converse of this, a beam of 
 circularly polarized light produces a magnetic force parallel 
 to the direction in which it is travelling. 
 
CHAPTER V. 
 
 RECIPROCAL RELATIONS BETWEEN PHYSICAL FORCES 
 WHEN THE SYSTEMS EXERTING THEM ARE IN A 
 STEADY STATE. 
 
 44. THE preceding methods are applicable to systems 
 in all states, whether steady or variable. When however the 
 system is in a steady state the reciprocal relations between 
 the various physical forces become so simple that they seem 
 deserving of special treatment, and we shall accordingly 
 consider them separately. 
 
 Let us consider the mutual effect of two quantities fixed 
 by the coordinates / and q upon each other. Let us 
 suppose that we have a force P of type / acting upon the 
 system, then P will alter the coordinate p in a definite way 
 and the amount of the alteration may depend upon the 
 value of the other coordinate q. Let us suppose that q 
 suffers a small alteration 8^ and that 8P is the amount by 
 which P must be increased in order to keep p the same as 
 before. Then since the system is in a steady state if L be 
 the Lagrangian function we have 
 
 and 
 
RECIPROCAL RELATIONS. 8 1 
 
 SO that &P=-^-8? ( 8 9)- 
 
 Now if we have a force Q of type q producing a definite 
 change in the coordinate q then if we alter p by S/ we must 
 in order to keep q constant alter Q by some quantity 8(2, 
 and since 
 
 e-S 
 
 dq 
 
 and Q + *Q = -~-^ty, 
 
 dq dpdq * 
 
 we have %Q = -^ (9) 
 
 dpdq 
 
 so that by (89) and (90) we have 
 
 fdP\ -C*Q\ ( \ 
 
 \ dq J p constant \ dp ) q constant 
 
 Or the alteration in P when q is increased by unity, p being 
 constant, is the same as the alteration in Q when / is 
 increased by unity, q being constant. Thus if P depends 
 upon q then Q will depend upon / and vice versa. And 
 we notice that if by increasing q we increase the "spring" 
 of / then by increasing p we shall increase the " spring " 
 Off. 
 
 Equation (91) is analogous to the " thermodynamical 
 relations" given in Maxwell's Theory of Heat, p. 169 and 
 forms one of those reciprocal relations which exist in 
 physics and which so often enable us to duplicate discoveries 
 in Physical Science. The consequences of reciprocal rela- 
 tions of a different kind are considered by Lord Rayleigh 
 in the Theory of Sound, Vol. i. Chapter 5. 
 
 As an example of the application of this equation we 
 
 T. D. 6 
 
82 DYNAMICS. 
 
 may take the case of a wire bent into any shape by the 
 action of any number of forces two of which are P and Q, 
 then the increase in Q required to keep its point of 
 application at rest when / is increased by unity, will also 
 be the amount by which P must be increased to prevent its 
 point of application moving when q is increased by unity. 
 
 Or again, we see by this equation that if the force 
 required to produce a given extension in an iron wire is 
 altered by magnetizing the wire then the magnetic force 
 required to magnetize the wire to a given intensity will be 
 altered by straining the wire : and that these alterations will 
 be connected by the following relation, P being the tension, 
 <rthe extension of the wire, /f the magnetic force and /the 
 intensity of magnetization, 
 
 fdP\ = tdff\ 
 
 \fl-f Je constant \ u //constant 
 
 Again when a current passes through an electrolyte in 
 solution it decomposes it and the strength of the solution 
 changes, this change in the strength of the solution may, 
 and in general will, change the coefficient of compressibility, 
 the volume and the surface tension of the solution, and in 
 this case equation (91) shows that the electromotive force 
 required to send a given current through a cell containing 
 the solution will be altered by pressure and by any change 
 in the free surface of the solution. Let E be the electro- 
 motive force, y the current, v the volume of the solution, 
 S its surface, and T its surface tension, then in this case for 
 the effect of pressure / we have 
 
 fdE\ = -( d -\ ( } 
 
 \ (IV / y constant V*y/ v constant 
 
 The negative sign is taken because/ tends to diminish v. 
 
EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 83 
 
 If k be the modulus of compression, v the volume of 
 the solution when free from pressure, then 
 
 >=*K) 
 
 'dp\ f v\ dk 
 when y is constant, k is also constant so that 
 
 koV 
 o 
 
 and therefore from (93) 
 
 >= v Ji-l\ d d A 
 
 vj dy k 
 I dk 
 
 so that if the pressure is increased from P l to P 2 the 
 increase E in the electromotive force required to keep the 
 current constant is given by 
 
 T fib 
 
 *E=\v a \P*-P?\ ............ (94). 
 
 To get an idea of the magnitude of this effect let us take 
 the case of a solution of chloride of lithium, the volume of 
 the solution being i cubic centimetre. 
 
 The data for calculating dkjdy in this case are the fol- 
 lowing : 
 
 The passage of unit quantity of electricity corresponds 
 to the decomposition of about 4'3xio~ s grammes of 
 lithium chloride, we shall suppose that none of this is redis- 
 solved, then the passage of a unit quantity of electricity will 
 withdraw this quantity of salt from the solution. 
 
 Rontgen's and Schneider's experiments (Wiedemann's 
 Annalen, xxix. p. 186, 1886) show that the addition of 6 
 grammes of lithium chloride to 100 cubic centimetres of 
 
 62 
 
84 DYNAMICS. 
 
 water increases the modulus of compression by about 15 
 parts in 100, so that if the increase in the modulus is 
 proportional to the quantity of salt, then the subtraction of 
 4-3 x 10 ~ 3 grammes from i cubic centimetre will diminish 
 the modulus by about i part in 100, hence 
 
 i dk 
 
 T -r =- 10 , approximately. 
 
 Now k for water is about 2-2 x io 10 , so that if B is the 
 change produced by a pressure of 1000 atmospheres, which 
 in absolute measure is about io 9 , we have 
 
 TO 18 T 
 
 & = -J- ^ TO 2 = -Jxi0 6 , 
 2 2'2 X IO 10 IO 2 
 
 that is the pressure of 1000 atmospheres would diminish the 
 counter electromotive force by about 1/400 of a volt. 
 
 The numbers given by Rontgen and Schneider for the 
 effect of carbonate of soda on the coefficient of compres- 
 sibility, show that the effect of pressure on a solution of this 
 salt would be much greater than that on the lithium chloride 
 solution. 
 
 Let us now suppose that the volume of the solution is 
 altered by the passage of an electric current, but that the 
 coefficient of compressibility is unaltered. 
 
 Then since 
 
 if the passage of the unit of electricity increases the volume 
 by dvjdy we must apply an additional pressure kdvjv Q dy to- 
 keep the volume constant, so that 
 
 /dp\ 
 
 \<ty). 
 
 and the equation (91) becomes 
 
EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 85 
 fdE\ _^fa 
 
 \dv) y constant" # d 1 ' 
 
 so that since kdv\v Q = djt>, we see from this equation that 
 the change BE in the counter electromotive force is given 
 by the equation 
 
 J B = S/g (95)- 
 
 When the electric current goes through a salt solution 
 the changes which take place and which alter the volume 
 are so numerous that it is not possible to calculate from 
 existing data the change which takes place in the volume 
 when unit quantity of electricity passes through the solution. 
 In order to see of what order this effect is likely to be, let us 
 suppose that the change in the volume is comparable with 
 the volume of the salt electrolysed. When unit quantity of 
 electricity goes through a solution of sulphate of potassium 
 it electrolyses about 9 x io~ 3 grammes of salt, and since the 
 specific gravity of the salt is 2*6, the volume of this is about 
 3 -5 x zo" 3 , hence in this case we may suppose that dvldy is 
 comparable with 3*5 x io~ 3 and that the change in the 
 counter electromotive force produced by 1000 atmospheres 
 is of the order 
 
 3'5 x i 6 , 
 
 or about 1/28 of a volt. 
 
 We will now consider the case when gas is given off. 
 Let us suppose we are electrolysing water, above which 
 we have air, enclosed by a cylinder with a moveable piston. 
 
 If unit quantity of electricity goes through the water, 
 9 x io~ 4 grammes of water are electrolysed, the volume of 
 the water therefore diminishes by 9x10** cubic centi- 
 metres. At one terminal io~ 4 grammes of hydrogen will be 
 liberated, and 8 x io~ 4 grammes of oxygen at the other. 
 
86 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Let us proceed to find the change in the pressure, the 
 volume remaining constant when unit of electricity passes. 
 
 The diminution in pressure due to the disappearance of 
 the water is, if v be the volume of the gas above the water 
 
 the increase in pressure due to the io~ 4 grammes of hydro- 
 gen is if the temperature is o C. 
 
 and the increase due to the oxygen is one half of this, hence 
 
 so that by (95) 
 
 dE 
 But 
 
 so that 
 
 E i,., K _ 41 
 
 =- = -- {1-65 x io - 9 x/ x 10 }. 
 
 dv v l 
 
 dE i'6q x io 6 
 
 - 9 x io . 
 
 dp p 
 
 If the pressure is increased from P l to P a the change 
 & in E is given by the equation 
 
 &E= 1-65 x io 6 x log 5* - 9 x io- 4 x (P 2 -P,). 
 
 *1 
 
 For a thousand atmospheres the counter electromotive 
 force is increased by 
 
 i '65 x i o 6 x 6*9 - 9 x io~ 4 x io 9 approximately, 
 = i'2 x io 7 9 x io 5 , 
 
EFFECT OF SURFACE TENSION ON E. M. F. 8/ 
 
 so that the counter electromotive force is increased by about 
 one-eighth of a volt. 
 
 The effect of surface tension is given by 
 
 I 7 Ql / I 7 I 
 
 \o / y constant \ #y /^S 1 constant 
 
 This effect will in general be very small, for example in the 
 case of chloride of lithium, the experiments of Rontgen 
 and Schneider (Wiedemann's Annalen, xxix. p. 209, 1886), 
 show that the addition of 6 parts by weight of lithium chloride 
 to 100 of water increases the surface tension by about 3 parts 
 in 100. The passage of i unit of electricity decomposes 
 about 4 '3 x io~ 3 grammes of lithium chloride, so that if v 
 be the volume of the solution 
 
 i dT 13 io 2 
 
 r- = - X -^-_ X X 4'7 X IO 
 
 T dy v io 2 6 
 
 = - 2 x io~ 3 - approximately, 
 
 and for water T= 81, 
 
 so that 
 
 dT 16-2 x io~ 2 
 
 and therefore by (96) 
 
 dE 16-2 x io 
 
 or if the volume remains constant the effect of increasing 
 the surface by S is to diminish the counter electromotive 
 force by 
 
 l6'2 X I0~ 2 6* 
 
 v 
 
 Suppose that the liquid is squeezed out into a thin film 
 
88 DYNAMICS. 
 
 whose thickness is / then 
 
 v = St 
 and 
 
 ~ l6'2 X I0~ 2 
 
 S= - - 
 
 If t were of the order of molecular distances say io~ 7 then 
 
 &" = - 1 6*2 x io 5 , 
 
 or the counter electromotive force is diminished by about 
 '016 volts. 
 
 The preceding investigation is on the supposition that 
 the electrolyte is in contact with the air; if it were in 
 contact with a solid such as glass the withdrawal of the 
 electrolyte from the solution on the passage of the current 
 would increase the surface tension between the liquid and 
 the solid, so that the electromotive force required to 
 decompose an electrolyte in a porous plate would be larger 
 than that required to decompose it when it is in bulk. 
 
 Again, the surface tension of liquids is altered when they 
 absorb gases, so that the electromotive force required to 
 decompose an electrolyte which absorbs a gas produced by 
 the passage of the current will be different when the 
 electrolyte fills the interstices of a porous plate from that 
 required when it is in an ordinary electrolytic cell. 
 
CHAPTER VI. 
 
 EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE UPON THE PROPERTIES 
 OF BODIES. 
 
 45. WE have only considered so far the relations 
 between the phenomena in electricity, magnetism and elas- 
 ticity and have not discussed any phenomenon in which 
 temperature effects occur. We shall now go on however to 
 endeavour to extend the methods we have hitherto used to 
 those cases in which we have to consider the effects of 
 temperature upon the properties of bodies. 
 
 Before doing this however we must endeavour to arrive 
 at some dynamical interpretation of temperature. The only 
 case in which a dynamical conception of temperature has 
 been attained is in the Kinetic Theory of Gases, and there 
 the temperature is the mean energy due to the translatory 
 motion of the molecules of the gas. So that if N be the 
 number of molecules of the gas in unit volume NB is the 
 energy of translatory motion of the molecules at the tempe- 
 rature 0. 
 
 There seems good reason for believing that NO is a part 
 of the kinetic energy of the molecules when these are 
 aggregated so as to form a solid or liquid as well as when 
 .they form a gas. 
 
9O DYNAMICS. 
 
 The experiments and ideas which led to the establish- 
 ment of the principle of the Conservation of Energy at the 
 same time led to the conclusion that the energy of sensible 
 heat is energy due to the motion of the molecules and is 
 therefore part of the kinetic energy of the system. The 
 reader should refer on this point to Maxwell's Theory of 
 Heat, p. 301. Another reason for supposing that the 
 temperature in the liquid as well as in the gaseous 
 condition is measured by the mean energy of translation 
 of the molecules is, that Van der Waals (Die Continidtdt des 
 gasformigen und fliissigen Zustandes] has given a theory of 
 the molecular constitution of bodies in those states which 
 are intermediate between the liquid and gaseous, in which 
 this supposition is made, and that this theory agrees well 
 with the facts in many important respects. And again 
 since most solids and liquids are capable of getting into a 
 state where their specific heat is constant, that is, where the 
 rise in temperature is proportional to the energy communi- 
 cated to the system, we are led to suppose that the kinetic 
 energy of some particular kind is a linear function of the 
 temperature. 
 
 This following illustration will show that it is probable 
 that when we have two bodies in contact the collisions- 
 between the molecules will tend to equalize the mean 
 energy of this translatory motion when these bodies are 
 solids and liquids as well as when they are gases. The 
 mean translatory energies of two substances in contact thus 
 tend to become equal, so that in this important respect the 
 mean translatory energy has the same property as tempe- 
 rature. 
 
 Let us suppose that we have two different substances, 
 composed of molecules A and B respectively, and that the 
 molecules of the two substances are separated by a material 
 
TEMPERATURE. 91 
 
 plane surface. Let us also suppose that the mass of this, 
 plane is large compared with that of a molecule of either 
 substance and that it is prevented by perfectly elastic stops 
 from moving through more than a distance comparable 
 with molecular distances. Since the mass of the plane is 
 very much greater than that of a molecule and since it can 
 only move through a small distance in one direction the 
 velocity of the plane will be very small compared with that 
 of the molecules we shall suppose that it is so small that 
 the number of molecules which are moving more slowly 
 than the plane may be neglected, or what amounts to the 
 same thing that all the molecules on the surface of the 
 substances which are moving towards the plane strike it, 
 and that none of those which are moving away from the 
 plane do so. Let us suppose that the action between the 
 molecule and the plane is the same as that between a 
 perfectly elastic sphere and plane. 
 
 Let m be the mass of an A molecule, v the velocity of 
 the molecule, and a the angle its direction of motion makes 
 with the normal to the plane before impact, V the velocity 
 after impact, M the mass of the plane, w and W its velocity 
 before and after it is struck by the molecule. Then we 
 may easily show that 
 
 - m{ V 2 -v*}= -r-rj -AMw 2 - mv 2 cos 2 a-(M- m) vw cos a}. 
 
 2 (M+m)* { 
 
 Let us take the sum of the equations representing the 
 effects of all the collisions which take place in unit time, we 
 have 
 
 y$m { V 2 - v*\ 
 
 = (M+ m} 2 ^ ^ Mw * ~ v 2cosSa -( M - m ) zwcos a}... (9 7). 
 If N be the number of A molecules which come in con- 
 
92 DYNAMICS. 
 
 tact with the plane in unit time and O l the mean translatory 
 kinetic energy of such molecules, then if B0 l denotes the 
 change in 1 in unit time 
 
 If N' be the number of collisions and the mean 
 kinetic energy of the plane, then 
 
 Since the directions of motion of the A molecules are 
 equally distributed 
 
 Since the plane is supposed to move so slowly that all 
 the molecules moving towards it strike it, and since its 
 average velocity is zero, we have 
 
 5 (M m) vw cos a = o, 
 so that equation (97) becomes 
 
 {2N'0 - J W0\ ..... (98). 
 
 m) 2 * 
 
 If 2 be the average translatory kinetic energy of the 
 molecules which strike the plane in unit time, ^ the num- 
 ber of such molecules and TV/ the number of collisions, m' 
 the mass of a molecule, we have similarly 
 
 ' e - 
 
 and we have also 
 2 Mm 
 
TEMPERATURE. 93 
 
 Now we can make the average kinetic energy of the 
 plane what we please by giving it the proper initial velocity. 
 For our purpose we wish the plane to act as a transmitter 
 and not as a storer of energy, and it will do so if we give it 
 such an initial velocity that the mean kinetic energy of the 
 plane does not alter in unit time. If this is the case 8# 
 vanishes and we have by (100) 
 
 so that 
 
 m'N 
 ~ 
 
 mN' 
 b 
 
 (M+m) 2 ' 
 
 Substituting these values for 20-^/3, and 20-0 2 /3 in 
 equations (98) and (99), we have 
 
 Thus if 2 is greater than W O l will increase and 2 will 
 diminish, and vice versa, and if O l is equal to 2 they will 
 remain equal ; thus the mean translatory energy behaves in 
 these respects exactly like temperature. There seems 
 nothing in the above illustration to restrict it to the case of 
 gases, and we should expect it would hold equally well for 
 solids or liquids. 
 
94 DYNAMICS. 
 
 46. We are thus led to assume that part of the kinetic 
 energy of a system, whether that system be a portion of a 
 solid, liquid or gas, is proportional to the temperature. 
 
 Let us denote this part of the kinetic energy by 
 
 where u is a coordinate helping to fix the position or con- 
 figuration of a molecule. We see at once that there is an 
 essential difference between these coordinates and those we 
 have hitherto been considering and which fix the geometrical, 
 strain, electric and magnetic configuration of the system. 
 We have these latter coordinates entirely under our control 
 and subject to certain limitations imposed by the finite 
 strength of materials, the strength of dielectrics, and 
 magnetic saturation ; we may make them take any value we 
 please. We may therefore fitly call these coordinates con- 
 trollable coordinates. It is quite different, on the other 
 hand, with the coordinates fixing the separate moving parts 
 of the systems whose kinetic energy constitutes the tempera- 
 ture of the body. We can it is true affect the average 
 value of certain functions of a large number of these coor- 
 dinates, but we have no control over the coordinates indivi- 
 dually. We may therefore call these coordinates "uncon- 
 strainable" coordinates. Their fundamental property is 
 that we can not oblige any individual coordinate to take 
 any value which may be assigned. Since we have no power 
 of dealing with individual molecules, the "controllable" 
 coordinates must merely fix the position of a large number 
 of molecules as a whole. 
 If the term 
 
 involves any "controllable" coordinate <, then it is evident 
 
TEMPERATURE. 95 
 
 that this coordinate <f> must enter as a factor into all the 
 terms in the form expressed by the equation 
 
 J {(uu)u* + ...} = J/(0) \(uu)'u* + ...} (101), 
 
 where the coefficients (uu)' do not involve < : otherwise the 
 phenomenon would be influenced more by the motion of 
 some particular molecule than by that of others. We 
 shall assume that 0, the temperature, is proportional to 
 
 that is that 
 
 = JC" {()** + } , (102), 
 
 where C does not involve any of the "controllable" coordi- 
 nates which fix the configuration of the system. 
 
 47. We may conveniently divide the kinetic energy of 
 a system into two parts, one depending on the motion of 
 "unconstrainable" coordinates, which we shall denote by 
 T u , and we shall assume that this is proportional to the 
 absolute temperature 6, the other depending on the motion 
 of the "controllable" coordinates, we shall denote by T c , 
 T c corresponds to what v. Helmholtz in his paper on 
 11 Die Thermo dynamik chemischer Vorgange" ( Wissenschaftliche 
 Abhandlungen, n. p. 958) calls "die freie Energie." There 
 will not be any terms in the kinetic energy involving the 
 product of the velocities of an " unconstrainable" and a 
 "controllable" coordinate, otherwise the energy of the system 
 would be altered by reversing the motion of all the "uncon- 
 strainable" coordinates. 
 
 Let us suppose that <j> is a controllable coordinate which 
 enters into the expression for that part of the kinetic energy 
 which expresses the temperature, then if & be the. external 
 force of this type acting on the system we have by Lagrange's 
 equations, V being the potential energy, 
 
96 DYNAMICS. 
 
 a_d_dT_dT dV 
 
 ~ dt~d$ d<$>* d<$>' 
 
 Now T=T C +T H 
 
 dT u 
 and p- = o, 
 
 #(/> 
 
 so that 
 
 to_d_dT c _dT c __dT d_V 
 ~ dt d$ d$ d<j> + d<t>" 
 
 Now by equation (103) T u is of the form 
 
 where (ww)' does not involve <, so that we have 
 dT u 
 
 and therefore 
 
 dV . 
 
 '" 
 
 differentiating this equation on the supposition that all the 
 controllable coordinates are constant and that the only 
 variable is the energy depending on the motion of " uncon- 
 trollable " coordinates, we have 
 
 and therefore by (104) 
 
 48. Now let us suppose that energy is communicated to 
 the system, partly by the action of the external forces on the 
 "controllable" coordinates, and partly through the "uncon- 
 strainable" coordinates: let the quantity of work commu- 
 nicated in the latter way be S<2- If the motion of the 
 
DYNAMICAL EQUATIONS. 97 
 
 "unconstrainable" coordinates is that which gives rise to the 
 energy corresponding to temperature, SQ may be regarded 
 as a quantity of heat communicated to the system. 
 
 We have by the Conservation of Energy, if </> denotes a 
 " controllable " coordinate, 
 
 S7; + S7;+SF ......... (107). 
 
 Now *T e =$8<l> + :S<j> .......... (108), 
 
 I 9 a<f> ) 
 
 and since T c is a quadratic function of the velocities of the 
 " controllable " coordinates, we have 
 
 and therefore 
 
 ........... (109); 
 
 a<f> ) 
 
 so that by subtracting (108) from (109) we get 
 
 Since the change in the configuration is that which 
 actually takes place in the time S/> we have 
 
 <8/=S0, 
 so that 
 
 ddT e dT\ 
 
 - 
 
 and therefore equation (107) becomes 
 
 Now, if V be completely fixed by the controllable 
 coordinates, we have 
 
 T. D. 
 
98 DYNAMICS. 
 
 So that 
 
 Substituting for <l> the value given by (103) we have 
 
 S<2 = 2S<A -~ + 8T U ( JI 3); 
 
 but by (106) 
 
 d _Tn = _r L 
 
 so that 
 
 
 
 uJ 4> constant 
 
 87; ......... (114). 
 
 Let us suppose that the quantity of work communicated 
 to the system is just sufficient to prevent T u from changing, 
 then 
 
 or 
 
 V d<f> } T U constant \dT u ) $ constant 
 
 Remembering that T u is proportional to the absolute 
 temperature 0, we see that equation (115) becomes 
 
 /dQ\ _ 
 
 \d<j>/6 constant 
 
 dO 
 
 $. constant 
 
 where in finding d^fdO we must take care that is the only 
 quantity which varies. 
 
 In this form equation (116) is identical with the third 
 thermodynamical relation given in Maxwell's Theory of 
 Heat, p. 169, and v. Helmholtz in his paper "Die Thermo- 
 
DYNAMICAL EQUATIONS. 99 
 
 dynamik Chemischer Vorgange" ( Wissenschaftliche Abhand- 
 hmgen, 2, p. 962) deduces this equation from the Second 
 Law of Thermodynamics and applies it to the case of 
 the variation of the electromotive force of galvanic cells 
 with temperature. The conclusions at which he arrives 
 have been verified by the experiments of Czapski (Wied. 
 Ann. 21, p. 209) and Jahn (Wied. Ann. 28, pp. 21, 491). 
 If 8(2 = o, that is if all the work done on the system is done 
 by means of forces of the types of the various controllable 
 coordinates, then we have by equation (114) 
 
 dT H ) $ constant \ d<$> /> constant 
 
 49. Since 
 
 we see by (113) that 
 
 or 
 
 ^=28 log/ W + Slog T; ......... (118), 
 
 * u 
 
 so that 
 
 BQ 
 T u 
 
 is a perfect differential. This is analogous to the Second 
 Law of Thermodynamics, and we see by the analogy that 
 it shews that energy arising from the motion of quantities 
 fixed by "unconstrainable" coordinates can only be partly 
 converted into work spent in moving the quantities fixed by 
 the "controllable" coordinates. The amount which can be 
 converted follows laws analogous to those which regulate 
 the conversion of heat into mechanical work. 
 
 72 
 
100 DYNAMICS. 
 
 In the preceding work we have assumed that the 
 potential energy of the system was not changed if the 
 "controllable" coordinates remained unchanged. When 
 however the system is a portion of a solid or liquid the 
 potential energy may by some alteration in the state of 
 aggregation be changed without there being any corre- 
 sponding change in the controllable coordinates. To 
 include this case we must suppose that V is a function of 
 the temperature as well as of the <'s, and that its value in 
 the neighbourhood of the temperature corresponding to a 
 change of state in the substance varies very rapidly. 
 
 In this case we have 6 being the temperature, 
 
 v dV dV 
 
 8F =^ + ^ 8 ' 
 and instead of (114) 
 
 Since 80 and &T H vanish together we see that equation 
 (116) still holds. Equations (117) and (118) however require 
 modification. We have now (&Q-S V($> constant))/ 7L a perfect 
 differential instead of $Q/T, e . 
 
 50. Relations between heat and strain. We 
 shall now apply equation (116) to determine the effects due 
 to the variation of various physical quantities with tempera- 
 ture, and shall begin by considering the effects produced by 
 the variation of the coefficients of elasticity m and n with 
 temperature. 
 
 In equation (116) let us suppose that <J> is a stress of 
 type e, then using the same notation as in 35, we have 
 $ = m (e +f + g) + n(e -f-g\ 
 
 dn . f . 
 
THERMAL EFFECTS DUE TO STRAIN. IOI 
 
 So that by equation (116), 8Q, the heat which must be 
 supplied to unit volume of the bar to keep its temperature 
 from changing when e is increased by Be is given by the 
 equation 
 
 and thus if the coefficients of elasticity diminish as the 
 temperature increases, heat must be supplied to keep the 
 temperature of a bar constant when it is lengthened, and 
 hence if the bar is left to itself and not supplied with heat it 
 will cool when it is extended. 
 
 If $ is a couple tending to twist the bar about the axis 
 of x, we have, if a is the twist about that axis, 
 
 dn 
 
 and therefore by (116) 8(), the heat required by unit 
 volume of the bar to keep the temperature from changing 
 when a is increased by &a is given by the equation 
 
 so that if a rod which is already twisted is twisted still further 
 it will cool if left to itself, provided, as is usually the case, 
 the coefficient of rigidity diminishes as the temperature 
 increases. 
 
 The preceding results were first obtained by means of 
 the Second Law of Thermodynamics by Sir William Thomson 
 in his paper on the Dynamical Theory of Heat (Collected 
 Papers, Vol. i. p. 309). 
 
 51. Thermal Effects produced by Electrifica- 
 tion. Let us now consider the case when < is an electric 
 
IO2 DYNAMICS. 
 
 force parallel to the axis of x, producing an electric displace- 
 ment / in that direction. In this case if K be the specific 
 inductive capacity of the dielectric, we have 
 
 _ 
 
 )f constant ~ ~ K* dQ J ' 
 
 so that 8(2, the heat which must be supplied to unit volume 
 of the dielectric in order to prevent its temperature changing 
 when the electric displacement is increased by S/j is by 
 (116) given by the equation 
 
 Some recent experiments made by Mr Cassie in the Caven- 
 dish Laboratory on the effect of temperature on the specific 
 inductive capacities of glass, mica and ebonite, have shewn 
 that the specific inductive capacity of these dielectrics 
 increases as the temperature increases, and that at about 
 
 30 C. 
 
 i dK , . 
 
 for glass, 
 
 i dK 
 
 T r --, = '0004 for mica, 
 li. uv 
 
 i dK 
 
 -^j:- = '0007 for ebonite. 
 A av 
 
 Thus the heat which must be supplied to unit volume of a 
 piece of glass to enable its temperature to remain constant 
 when it is electrified is by (123) 
 
 002 . 
 
 and this at 30 C. 
 
THERMAL EFFECTS DUE TO MAGNETIZATION. IO3 
 
 /' 
 
 is the work supplied from electrical sources, hence in charg- 
 ing a Leyden jar, we see that the mechanical equivalent of 
 the heat absorbed by it during charging, if its temperature 
 remains constant, is about two-thirds of the work supplied 
 to it from electrical sources. 
 
 We see also by equation (123) that a piece of glass will 
 be cooled when it moves from a place where the electric 
 force is weak to one where it is strong. 
 
 52. Thermal effects of Magnetization. Let us 
 
 now suppose that $ is a magnetic force magnetizing a piece 
 of soft iron or other magnetizable substance to the intensity 
 /. Then if k be the coefficient of magnetic induction 
 
 so that 
 
 \d(t. 
 
 /constant </ 
 
 And therefore &Q the heat which must be supplied to 
 unit volume of the magnet to keep its temperature con- 
 stant when the intensity of magnetization is increased by 
 87 is by equation (116) given by the equation 
 
 so that if the coefficient of magnetization decreases as 
 the temperature increases then a magnet will get heated 
 when its intensity of magnetization is increased, and there- 
 fore when it moves from weak to strong parts of the 
 magnetic field. This was pointed out by Sir William 
 Thomson in the paper just quoted. 
 
IO4 
 
 DYNAMICS. 
 
 The experimental investigation of the heating effects 
 produced by the motion of magnetizable bodies in variable 
 magnetic fields is rendered difficult from the heating effect 
 produced by the electric currents induced in the magnet by 
 the alteration in the number of lines of magnetic force pass- 
 ing through it. ' 
 
 Another thing which would increase the difficulty is 
 the phenomenon called by Ewing hysteresis (Experimental 
 Investigation on Magnetism, Phil. Trans. 1885, p. n). 
 This causes the intensity of magnetization to depend not 
 only on the strength of the magnetic force, but also on the 
 previous magnetic history of the substance : so that the 
 curve representing the relation between intensity of magneti- 
 zation (ordinate) and magnetic force (abscissa), as the mag- 
 netic force goes through a complete cycle, will be of the 
 kind shewn in the accompanying figure, and will enclose 
 
 a finite area, indicating the dissipation of a finite quantity 
 Of energy proportional to the area of the curve, and this 
 dissipated energy will appear as heat. 
 
 Experiments made on the effects of temperature upon 
 
THERMAL EFFECTS DUE TO MAGNETIZATION. IO$ 
 
 the coefficient of magnetization of iron have shewn that 
 these are rather complex. Baur (Wiedemann's Elektridtdt. 
 iii. p. 750) from his experiments on this subject has arrived 
 at the following results. 
 
 The influence of temperature upon the magnitude of the 
 coefficient of magnetization depends upon the magnitude of 
 the magnetizing force. 
 
 The coefficient of magnetization increases with the 
 temperature if the magnetizing force does not exceed a 
 certain value, but when the magnetizing force exceeds this 
 value the coefficient of magnetization diminishes as the 
 temperature increases. 
 
 The smaller the magnetizing force the greater the influ- 
 ence of temperature upon the coefficient of magnetization. 
 
 Taking these results in conjunction with equation (125) 
 we see, 
 
 1. That when a magnetizable body moves in a magnetic 
 field where the force is everywhere less than the critical 
 value, its temperature will tend to fall when it moves from 
 places of weak to places of strong magnetic force and vice 
 versa. 
 
 2. That when the body is placed in a magnetic field 
 where the magnetic force is everywhere greater than the 
 critical value, its temperature will rise when it moves from 
 places of weak to places of strong magnetic force and vice 
 versa. 
 
 The coefficient of magnetization of nickel diminishes as 
 the temperature increases, so that a piece of nickel will get 
 warmer when it moves from a weak to a strong part of the 
 magnetic field. The coefficient of magnetization of cobalt 
 on the other hand increases as the temperature increases, so 
 that a piece of cobalt will cool as it moves from a weak to a 
 strong part of the magnetic field. 
 
CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ELECTROMOTIVE FORCES DUE TO DIFFERENCES 
 OF TEMPERATURE. 
 
 53. WE shall now go on to consider various cases in 
 which inequalities of temperature in a substance give rise 
 to electromotive forces. 
 
 Sir William Thomson has shewn that when a current 
 of electricity flows along an unequally heated bar it carries 
 with it as it flows from a hot to a cold place either heat 
 or cold : heat if the bar is made of brass or copper, cold 
 if it is made of iron. Sir William Thomson expressed this 
 result by saying that the specific heat of electricity in copper 
 and brass is positive, since the electricity in this case carries 
 heat with it just as if it were a real fluid possessing specific 
 heat ; the " specific heat " of electricity in iron on the other 
 hand is said to be negative, since electricity in iron behaves 
 with regard to heat in the opposite way to a fluid possessing 
 specific heat. 
 
 It follows from this result, by the consideration of the 
 reciprocal relations, that electromotive forces must be de- 
 veloped in any conductor the temperature of which is not 
 uniform throughout. We shall now endeavour to find what 
 terms in the Lagrangian function these phenomena corre- 
 
THERMOELECTRICITY. I O/ 
 
 spond to, or rather we shall shew that if there was a certain 
 term in the Lagrangian function an unequally heated body 
 would exhibit similar phenomena. 
 
 Let us suppose that in the term 
 
 i{(uu)u 2 +...}, 
 
 which expresses the part of the kinetic energy of unit 
 volume of the substance due to sensible heat, the coeffi- 
 cients (uu) are functions of 
 
 d , ... d , , d . 7 . 
 i^-n + Ty^*-^^ 
 
 where <r x , <r y , <r z are quantities not explicitly involving 
 f, g, h, the quantities of electricity which have passed 
 through planes of unit area at right angles to the axes. 
 x, y, z respectively 
 
 Let us write for the sake of brevity 
 
 d . .. d , N d , ,. 
 <./) + <ow) + a M)Bc 
 
 Then, since / g, h are controllable coordinates, and 
 by hypothesis (uu) involves e, we may write 
 
 ${()+...}=/()${()+...}, 
 
 where f(e) denotes some function of e. The coefficients- 
 (uu)' are supposed not to involve /, g, h explicitly. 
 
 By Hamilton's principle any term in the Lagrangian 
 function indicates the existence of effects which are the 
 same as those which would be produced by electromotive 
 forces parallel to the axes of x, y, z, and equal to the 
 coefficients of Sf, 8g, h which this term contributes when 
 the variation of the Lagrangian function is taken. 
 
 The term we are considering is, taking the whole 
 volume, 
 
 "f/WJ 
 
 IIP 
 
108 DYNAMICS. 
 
 When c is increased by Se the alteration in this term is 
 
 () {()' if + ...} dxdydz ...... (126). 
 
 Since 8. = M/) + (o>%) + (<r.M), 
 
 we see that if we integrate (126) by parts the terms 
 in S/"are 
 
 Since 
 
 is proportional to the temperature, we may put 
 
 and then (127) may be written 
 
 So that by Hamilton's principle if X be the force per 
 unit length which would produce the same effects as this 
 term indicates 
 
 To take the simplest case let us suppose that /(e) is a 
 linear function of , so that 
 
 As ^e/ is the alteration in the energy made by the 
 electrification, it can only be a small quantity, so that we 
 
THERMOELECTRICITY. 109. 
 
 have approximately 
 
 and therefore 
 
 or if b and a remain constant throughout the substance, 
 
 So that this term indicates the existence of an electromotive 
 force parallel to x and proportional to the rate of alteration 
 of the temperature in that direction. If Y and Z are the 
 electromotive forces parallel to y and z respectively we 
 have 
 
 '**- dy 
 
 bf$ dO 
 
 Z = a z - - 
 a dz 
 
 The occurrence of Bf in the surface integral shews that 
 there is a discontinuity in the potential at the surface of 
 separation of two media and that the potential in the first 
 medium is higher than that in the second by 
 
 where the suffix attached to the bracket indicates the medium 
 for which the value of the quantity inside the bracket is to 
 be taken. 
 
 54. Thermal effects of this term. Let us suppose 
 that 8(2 is the quantity of heat that must be supplied to- 
 unit volume of the conductor to keep its temperature from 
 changing when a quantity of electricity 8f flows through it,, 
 that is when /is increased by 8f. 
 
IIO DYNAMICS. 
 
 We see by equation (113) that 
 8(2 = the increase in T u when / is increased by 8/ 
 
 bft dO s _ , 
 = - <r x -=-_ Sf by equations 127 and 129. 
 
 If u be the current parallel to x and 8/ the time it has 
 l3een flowing 
 
 8/ = z/8/, 
 
 -so that BQ = -a- x -j-ut ( I 3)- 
 
 If the current flows in the direction in which heat is 
 flowing, that is from hot to cold, 8(? will have the same sign 
 as vjb, since J3 and u are necessarily positive. Hence if 
 vjb is positive heat must be supplied to unit volume to keep 
 the temperature constant when a current flows into it from 
 a hotter place, that is a current from a hot to a cold place 
 carries cold with it, so that in this case the electricity 
 behaves as if it had a negative specific heat. Hence vjb is 
 of the opposite sign to the specific heat of electricity in the 
 substance. 
 
 We see from equation (130) that the electromotive 
 force at any part of the circuit always tends to produce a 
 current in the same direction as one which would cause a 
 fall in temperature at this part of the circuit. 
 
 If we produced a distribution of electricity throughout 
 the volume of a body, some very peculiar results would 
 follow if this term existed. 
 
 Let us take the case of an isotropic body whose 
 temperature is uniform, then we may suppose that a-*, o^,, 
 <r x are each equal to <r and independent of x, y, z, then 
 
 d i~ f\ , d /- ~\ , d t- i\ - ~ S4f , * , dh 
 
 1 : dy dz 
 
THERMOELECTRICITY. I II 
 
 but if p be the volume density of the distribution of 
 electricity, 
 
 df dg dh_ 
 
 So that the energy in unit volume corresponding to the 
 heat energy equals 
 
 *)' <*+} ............. (131), 
 
 and thus when we alter the volume density of the electricity 
 we alter the energy due to the heat and therefore the 
 temperature. 
 
 To calculate the amount and even the sign of this 
 alteration in temperature we must observe that u... will be 
 altered if we suddenly alter p. The case is quite analogous 
 to that of a moving body the effective mass of which is 
 suddenly increased, we may suppose, by the tightening of a 
 string attached to another mass. In this case it is the 
 momentum of the system and not its velocity which remains 
 constant. 
 
 If we express the term (131) in terms of the momenta 
 z>j, v z ... corresponding to the various coordinates u^ u z , we 
 see, since 
 
 dT 
 
 that it will be of the form 
 
 where f(v lt v 2 --) denotes a quadratic function of z/ x , v 2 
 &c., which does not involve p. As this expression is pro- 
 portional to the temperature 0, we see that if p be suddenly 
 increased by Sp, the increase BO in the temperature is given 
 
112 DYNAMICS. 
 
 by the equation 
 
 80 
 
 so that if bo- is positive the temperature of the body is 
 increased by communicating a charge of electricity to it, 
 that is the electricity behaves like a body whose specific 
 heat was negative. But we saw that bo- was of the opposite 
 sign to what Sir William Thomson has defined as the 
 specific heat of electricity in the substance. Hence we 
 see that the analogy between the behaviour of electricity 
 and that of a fluid possessing either positive or negative 
 specific heat can be extended to cover the case when 
 a bodily charge of electricity is communicated to the 
 body. 
 
 We can shew however that if the charge of electricity be 
 of the same order of magnitude as those which occur in 
 electrostatic phenomena this heating effect must be ex- 
 tremely small. For multiplying both sides of equation (132) 
 by /?, we have 
 
 ($W fibo- 
 
 %- = - op, approximately. 
 u a 
 
 Now fSba-ja is by equation (130) the "specific heat" of 
 electricity. The value of this for antimony at the tempera- 
 ture 27C. is (see Tait's Heat, p. 180) about io~ 2 x 300 
 when the unit is io~ 5 of the E. M. F. of a Grove's cell. As 
 the E. M. F. of a Grove's cell is about 2 x io 8 in absolute 
 measure the "specific heat" of electricity in antimony in 
 absolute measure will be about 6000. 
 
 We must now find a limiting value for 8p. Let us sup- 
 pose that electricity is uniformly distributed through a sphere 
 of radius r, then if p be the density of the electrical distribu- 
 
THERMOELECTRICITY. 1 1 3 
 
 tion, K the specific inductive capacity, the force just outside 
 the sphere is 
 
 Now the greatest value this can have in air is (see 
 Everett's Units and Physical Constants, p. 142) about 4 x io 12 , 
 so that a limiting value of p will be given by 
 
 Now 
 
 so that P = - o- approximately. 
 
 9 x zoV J 
 
 Hence substituting this value of p for Sp, we get at the 
 temperature 27C. 
 
 9 x io x r 
 
 2 
 
 Now (3S6 is the mechanical equivalent of the heat 
 available for changing the temperature, so that the change 
 in temperature will be of the order 
 
 since 4-2 x io 7 is the mechanical equivalent of heat. 
 Thus the change of temperature which can be produced in 
 this way by any statical charge of electricity is infinitesimal. 
 
 55. Thermoelectric effects of strain. If the 
 
 quantity b in the expression for / (e) is a function of the 
 
 strain in the wire along which the current is passing, then 
 
 putting b=f (e\ where e denotes a strain in the wire, we 
 
 T. D. 8 
 
1 14 DYNAMICS. 
 
 see by equation (128) that at each point of the wire there 
 is the electromotive force 
 
 acting along the wire, ds being an element of its length. 
 
 Now if we have a closed circuit made of one metal, in 
 which <r x may vary with the temperature and state of strain, 
 then the integral of the expression taken round the circuit 
 will vanish if either or e is constant all along the circuit 
 but will not in general vanish if both and e vary round the 
 circuit. So that we cannot produce currents in a wire 
 whose temperature is constant by any variation in the strain, 
 nor in a wire where the strain is constant by any variation 
 in the temperature, while on the other hand we should 
 expect to get currents if both the strain and the tempera- 
 ture were variable. All these results agree exactly with 
 experiment, and hence we are led to conclude that b is a 
 function of the strain. 
 
 If this is so then communicating a volume distribution 
 of electricity to an unequally heated rod must tend to strain 
 it. 
 
 For let us suppose that the strain e is an extension of a 
 wire, then if a be the displacement of a point along the 
 wire 
 
 _da 
 ~Js' 
 
 If a be increased by Sa, the coefficient of <k in the 
 change in the Lagrangian function is, when the medium is 
 isotropic 
 
 and therefore, by Hamilton's principle, the effects due to 
 
PELTIER EFFECT. 1 15 
 
 this term are the same as would be produced by an external 
 force equal per unit length to (133) tending to strain the 
 wire. 
 
 Thus when an unequally heated wire has electricity dis- 
 tributed throughout the volume there will be stresses tending 
 to strain the wire. 
 
 If we consider twist instead of elongation we can show in 
 a similar way that an unequally heated wire will be twisted 
 when electricity is distributed through it. 
 
 56. The electromotive force in a thermoelectric circuit 
 is generally calculated from the heat developed in various 
 parts of the circuit by the passage of the current. The 
 amount of knowledge of the electromotive force which we 
 can derive from thermal considerations is however limited 
 in a way which I think is generally overlooked. 
 
 We see by 47 that when a coordinate x is increased 
 by #, the heat 8Q which must be supplied to the system 
 to prevent its temperature from changing is given by the 
 equation 
 
 where X is the force of type x acting on the system. 
 
 Now let X be an electromotive force in a thermoelectric 
 circuit and x a quantity of electricity, then we see by (114) 
 that from considerations about the heat developed we can 
 only derive information about the part of the electromotive 
 force which depends upon temperature and cannot tell 
 anything whatever about any other part. 
 
 As a particular application of this principle we see that 
 the Peltier effect can throw no light on the absolute differ- 
 ence of potential between two different metals and hence 
 there is nothing in the phenomena of thermoelectricity to 
 force us to attribute the large difference in potential ob- 
 
 82 
 
1 1 6 DYNAMICS. 
 
 served by Volta between two different metals in contact 
 to chemical action between them and the surrounding 
 medium. 
 
 57. Electromotive forces produced by inequal- 
 ities of temperature in a magnetic field, v. Etting- 
 hausen and Nernst (Wiedemanri s ;47ma/en, xxxi. 737 and 
 760, 1887) have recently discovered an electromotive force 
 due to inequalities in temperature which is very analogous 
 to the Hall effect. They found that when heat is flowing 
 across a thin plate made of a substance which can conduct 
 electricity, electromotive forces are produced in the plate, if 
 it is placed in a magnetic field. The direction of the elec- 
 tromotive force is at right angles both to the magnetic force 
 and to the direction in which the temperature is changing 
 fastest. The magnitude of the electromotive force is pro- 
 portional to the product of the magnetic force into the rate 
 of increase of the temperature at right angles to the lines of 
 magnetic force. 
 
 This electromotive force is especially large in bismuth. 
 
 If represents the temperature, and a, ft, y the com- 
 ponents of magnetic force parallel to the axes of x, y, z 
 respectively, the components of the electromotive force due 
 to this effect will if the laws we have just quoted are true be 
 given by the expressions 
 
 where Q is a quantity which has very different values in 
 different substances. The results of Nernst's determinations 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE IN MAGNETIC FIELD. 1 1/ 
 
 of this quantity (Wied. Ann. xxxi. 775), are given in the 
 following table 
 
 Bismuth 
 
 - 'IS 2 
 
 Antimony 
 
 -00887 
 
 Nickel 
 
 - -00861 
 
 Cobalt 
 
 '00224 
 
 Iron 
 
 + '00156 
 
 Steel 
 
 + -000706 
 
 Copper 
 
 + -000090 
 
 Zinc 
 
 + '000054 
 
 Silver + '000046 
 
 We shall now proceed to see what term in the Lagran 
 gian function would give rise to forces of this kind. 
 Let us consider the term 
 
 III 6 {T X 
 
 where / g, h are the components of the electric displace- 
 ment parallel to the axes of x, y, z respectively. 
 
 The variation of this term when /is increased by 8/is 
 
 JJS/Q 6 ($n - ym) dS- jjj S/Q (fl J - y |) d x dy tk, 
 
 where /, m, n are the direction cosines drawn outwards of 
 the normal to the surface enclosing the volume through 
 which the integrals are extended. 
 
 By Hamilton's principle the term in the surface integral 
 indicates that if we draw any circuit in the field then when 
 this circuit crosses the boundary of two media there is an 
 
Il8 DYNAMICS. 
 
 electromotive force whose components parallel to the axes 
 of x, }', z are respectively 
 
 where corresponding quantities in the media (i) and (2) are 
 indicated by affixing the suffixes i and 2 respectively to the 
 symbol representing the quantity, and /, m, n are the direc- 
 tion cosines of the normal drawn from medium (2) to 
 medium (i). 
 
 By the same principle the terms in the volume integral 
 indicate the existence of an electromotive force throughout 
 the body whose components per unit length parallel to the 
 axes of x, y, z are 
 
 dB 
 
 d&_ t_ 
 
 these are the expressions for the components of the electro- 
 motive force discovered by v, Ettinghausen and Nernst. 
 
 These forces do not satisfy the solenoidal condition ; they 
 will therefore produce a distribution of electricity throughout 
 the substance whose volume density p is given by the equa- 
 tion 
 
 -*L\lLo( d A_a d ^\ d oi dB -- 
 
 d ( dB i 
 
 where K is the specific inductive capacity of the substance,, 
 thus, 
 
THERMAL EFFECTS. 119 
 
 KQ$d6 (dft dy\ d6 fdy da\ dO (da. dfi^ 
 
 or neglecting Q 2 
 
 dO dO d 
 
 where ?/, z/, w are the components of the current. 
 
 58. Thermal phenomena arising from this term. 
 
 We can see by equation (113) that H the heat required by 
 unit volume to prevent the temperature from changing 
 when a quantity of electricity Sf passes through it parallel to 
 the axis of x is given by the equation 
 
 8ff = (that part of the electromotive force which 
 arises from the part of the energy corre- 
 sponding to the sensible heat) 8f; 
 thus the part of $7? which arises from this term is given by 
 
 so that when quantities of electricity Bf t $g, S/z pass parallel 
 to the axes of x, y, z respectively then 
 
 *TT nil d Q dff \*f ( d& d \* ^fn d6 
 
 -f= Q {\y-j- ft -r)f + \ a ^r ~y^~ %" + (P7r~^r 
 ^\\ r dy ^ dzJ \ dz r dxj 6 \ dx dy 
 
 or, if u, v, w are the components of current parallel to the 
 axes of x, y, z respectively and 8t the time the displacement 
 takes, then since 
 
 S/=z/S/; $g=vto; U = w&, 
 we have 
 
120 DYNAMICS. 
 
 If X, Y, Z are the mechanical forces acting on unit 
 volume of the conductor arising from the action of the 
 magnetic field on the currents flowing through the volume 
 
 X=n{yv-Pw} 
 
 Y= JJL {aw yu] 
 Z=p{pu-av}, 
 
 where /x is the magnetic permeability, combining these 
 equations with (135) we see that 
 
 dx dy 
 
 So that if the action of the mechanical force on the 
 current tends to make the substance conveying the current 
 move in the direction in which heat is flowing, then when 
 Q is negative, heat must be abstracted from the substance to 
 keep its temperature constant when currents of electricity 
 flow through it. And the heat which has to be supplied in 
 unit time to unit volume to prevent the temperature from 
 changing is given by the equation 
 
 SZT= - Q {resultant mechanical force on 
 
 /* 
 
 unit volume x flow of heat x 
 
 cosine of the angle between 
 these two quantities}. 
 
 Heating effects in a magnetic field have been detected 
 by v. Ettinghausen (Wiedemann's Annalen, xxx. pp. 737 
 760, 1887). 
 
 59. Magnetic effects of this term. If we apply to 
 the term 
 
 dxdydz 
 
MAGNETIC EFFECTS. 
 
 121 
 
 the same method as the one which in 43 we applied to 
 the term corresponding to Hall's effect, we shall see that it 
 involves the existence at a point , 17, where there are no 
 electric displacements of a magnetic force whose components 
 parallel to the axes of x, y, z are respectively 
 
 where 
 
 dg dh\ d i 
 
 dlC, ' 
 dh df\ d i 
 
 df 
 
 + -f 
 dy 
 
 de\ d i~l , 
 - -/- -T- - dxdydz, 
 dx) dz r J 
 
 where r is the distance between the points x, y, z and 
 
 ft ^ fc 
 
 If ^, 77, is a point at which there is an electric dis- 
 placement, then as before the components of the magnetic 
 force parallel to x, y, z respectively are 
 
 (136). 
 
 We see that the equation 
 
 - 
 
 dc, 
 
 is no longer true, but that now 
 
 4?r _ (dO fdf d? dh\ 
 
 47TU Q < ( + -* + __ ) _ 
 
 3 ^ \d\d drj dJ 
 
122 DYNAMICS. 
 
 It follows from equation (136) that if dielectrics as well 
 as conductors exhibit the phenomenon discovered by v. 
 Ettinghausen and Nernst then a steady electric displacement 
 through a heated dielectric may produce magnetic forces. 
 A numerical calculation similar to that in 43 will show 
 however that these forces are exceedingly small. 
 
 60. Thermal effects accompanying changes 
 in magnetization, arising from this term. Since 
 the magnetic forces expressed by equation (136) arise from 
 that part of the kinetic energy which corresponds to the 
 sensible heat, changes in the intensity of magnetization 
 must by equation (114) be accompanied by reversible 
 thermal effects. If the intensities parallel to the axes of 
 j?, y, z be increased by 8/4, SZ?, BC respectively, then by 
 equation (114) SZ7 the mechanical equivalent of the heat 
 which must be supplied to unit volume to prevent its 
 temperature from changing is given by the equation 
 
 61. Rotation of the plane of polarization pro- 
 duced by the flow of heat. Rowland has shown that 
 if Hall's effect exists in dielectrics, then, according to Max- 
 well's Electromagnetic Theory of Light, the plane of polariza- 
 tion of plane polarized light will be rotated when the 
 dielectric through which the light is passing is placed in 
 a magnetic field the lines of force of which are more or 
 less parallel to the direction of propagation of the light. 
 We shall now proceed to investigate whether the existence 
 of v. Ettinghausen's and Nernst's phenomenon will produce 
 
EFFECT ON VELOCITY OF LIGHT. 123 
 
 a rotation of the plane of polarization when a ray of plane 
 polarized light passes through a dielectric through which 
 heat is flowing. 
 
 Let us suppose that we have a circularly polarized ray 
 of light travelling parallel to the axis of z through a 
 dielectric in which there is a uniform flow of heat also 
 parallel to z. 
 
 Let / and g be the electric displacements parallel to 
 the axes of x and y respectively, ^and G the components 
 of the vector potential parallel to x and y respectively, 
 and X and Y the components of the electromotive force 
 parallel to these axes, then since dQjdx, dOjdy both vanish 
 
 dF d6 
 
 v dG 
 
 Y= - 
 
 where a and /3 are the components of the magnetic force 
 parallel to x and y respectively. 
 
 Hence if K be the specific inductive capacity 
 47r f _dF _ O ndQ\ 
 
 47r ^ dG dO 
 
 Differentiating the first of these equations with respect 
 to / we get 
 
 ~K~dt^~~df ~^Wdz ( I37 ) 
 
 but in a dielectric 
 
 df = _d*F 
 dt dz 2 ' 
 
124 DYNAMICS. 
 
 and in the small term 
 
 ^ dt dz ' 
 if we neglect Q 2 we may put 
 
 dj^ _d*F 
 ^~dt~ dtdz ' 
 
 where /A is the magnetic permeability of the dielectric. 
 
 Substituting these values in equation (137) we get 
 
 j_d*F _d z F QdQd 2 F 
 
 H.K dz 2 ~ df + ~fJi dz dtdz ' 
 
 For a circularly polarized ray we may put 
 
 4 27J " / . 
 
 F= A sin -r- (vt - 2) 
 
 where Fis the velocity of the light, and X its wave length. 
 Substituting this value for F in equation (138) we get 
 
 J-=,*-e^, 
 
 and thus the velocity of the ray is greater than if the 
 temperature had been uniform by 
 
 1 QdO 
 
 2 ^ dz' 
 
 The velocity of propagation of a ray circularly polarized 
 in the opposite sense will also be increased by the same 
 amount. So that regarding a plane polarized ray as made 
 up of two rays circularly polarized in opposite senses we 
 see that when such a ray passes through a medium in which 
 there is a steady flow of heat, the plane of rotation will 
 not be rotated, but the velocity will be increased by 
 
 1 Q <M 
 
 2 dz' 
 
EFFECT ON VELOCITY OF LIGHT. 12$ 
 
 Thus even if we had a transparent substance for which 
 Q was as great as for bismuth, viz. '13 and a fall of tempe- 
 rature of iooC. per millimetre, the change in the velocity 
 would only amount to 
 
 l x -13 x io 3 
 or 65, 
 
 this change is only about 2' 2 x io~ 7 per cent, of the velocity 
 of light, and violet light would have to traverse about 
 20.000 c.m. to gain or lose a wave length. This effect 
 therefore is much too small to be detected experimentally. 
 
 We saw by equation (135) that when electric displace- 
 ments take place in a field in which the temperature is not 
 uniform, heat is absorbed or evolved, so that we should 
 expect thermal changes to accompany the propagation of a 
 ray of light through a medium the temperature of which 
 was not uniform. 
 
 By equation (135) the heat SZf which must be supplied 
 in unit time to unit volume of the medium to prevent the 
 temperature changing, is if the heat is flowing along the 
 axis of z, given by the equation 
 
 Let us take the case of a plane polarized ray for which 
 approximately 
 
 g=0 
 
 a = o 
 
 cos (vt - z), 
 
 A 
 
126 DYNAMICS. 
 
 thus 
 
 . ^ <x . A CIV 27T . 27T . . x 
 
 tH(2 x - -v- COS-T- (vt z) sm^ (vt-z). 
 
 A <z A A 
 
 So that the propagation of light along an unequally 
 heated medium would if this theory is correct be accom- 
 panied by periodic emission and absorption of heat, analogous 
 to that which accompanies the propagation of sound according 
 to Laplace's theory. According to Maxwell (Electricity and 
 Magnetism, Vol. n. p. 402) the maximum value of /3 for 
 strong sunlight is '193 so that 
 
 ^TrvA - '193, 
 and therefore 
 
 
 
 let us take X as 3-9 x io~ 5 the wave length of the violet ray 
 H in air 
 
 H= 5 x io 2 x Q x cos (vt- z) sin-^ (vt-z). 
 (tz A A 
 
 If Q were as large as it is for bismuth, i.e. '132, and 
 there was a fall of 100 C. in one centimetre, then the 
 maximum amount of heat absorbed or emitted would be 
 
 3-3 x io 3 ; 
 
 this would correspond to changes of temperature of not 
 more than one ten thousandth of a degree centigrade, if 
 the specific heat of the substance were as great as that of 
 water. 
 
 62. Longitudinal effect, v. Ettinghausen and 
 1 Ernst found that in addition to the transversal electromotive 
 force there was a longitudinal one along the lines of flow of 
 the heat, which was not reversed when the magnetizing force 
 was reversed, and which was proportional to the square 
 of the magnetizing force as long as this was small. This 
 
THOMSON EFFECT. I2/ 
 
 shows that the quantity o- which we considered when we were 
 discussing the Thomson effect in 51 is a function of the 
 square of the magnetic force. If we consider the effect of 
 this term magnetically we shall see that it indicates that the 
 magnetic permeability of a magnet will be affected by the 
 proximity of a conductor throughout which electricity is 
 distributed. 
 
 63. It is interesting, because suggestive of new physical 
 phenomena, to trace the consequence of the existence in the 
 Lagrangian function of terms, which are symmetrical func- 
 tions of /, g, /i, a, (3, y and their differential coefficients, 
 such as terms proportional to 
 
 da. d(3 dy 
 * dx + *dy + l ~dz' 
 
 df O dg dh 
 
 a jr + P -T~ + y-T) 
 
 dx dy ' dz 
 
 , fdft dy\ /dy da\ /da dft\ 
 * \dz~~dy) +g \Ix~ dz) + \dy~~dx)' 
 
 /tf73 _ ^ 7 \ fdg dh\ /dy da\ fdh df\ 
 \dz dy) \dz dy) \dx dz) \dx dz) 
 
 dfi\ /df dg\ 
 <~7x)\4y~dx)' 
 
 The reader however who is interested in this will have 
 no difficulty in tracing the consequences of these terms by 
 the methods already given. 
 
CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 ON "RESIDUAL" EFFECTS. 
 
 64. THERE are a great many cases in which the appli- 
 cation of forces to a body seems to produce a change in 
 it, from which it does not recover for some time after the 
 forces have been removed. 
 
 Thus, for example, if we keep a metal wire or glass 
 fibre twisted for some time, it will not when the twisting 
 couple is removed at once vibrate symmetrically about its 
 original position of equilibrium, but will oscillate about a 
 new zero which gradually approaches the old one, the 
 maximum difference between the temporary and the true 
 zero and the time which elapses before these coincide 
 increasing within certain limits with the duration of the 
 original twisting couple. 
 
 Phenomena of this kind are called in German treatises 
 " elastiche nachwirkung." This peculiar effect of torsion 
 does not seem to have received a name in this country, 
 but the analogous cases in electricity and magnetism are 
 called respectively "residual charge" and "residual mag- 
 netism." This latter effect is only partly analogous to that 
 of the twisted wire, as they differ in one very important 
 respect, that of permanence. In the case of the twisted 
 
RESIDUAL EFFECTS. I2Q 
 
 wire the effect of the previous torsion will disappear if 
 time be given to it, but soft iron if kept free from dis- 
 turbance seems to be able to retain its magnetism for any 
 length of time. 
 
 We shall now endeavour to find a dynamical analogue 
 to the case of the twisted wire. Let us suppose that we 
 have a frictionless machine whose configuration is fixed 
 by one coordinate x and that this is connected with another 
 machine fixed by the coordinate y, the motion of this 
 machine being resisted by a frictional force proportional 
 to the velocity. We shall suppose at first that the mass of 
 the second machine is so small that its inertia may be 
 neglected, and that the connexion between the two machines 
 is expressed by the existence in their Lagrangian function 
 of a term/(jcj) which involves both x and y, but not their 
 differential coefficients with respect to the time. Then if 
 the force X acting on the first machine is the only external 
 force acting on the system, the equations of motion will be 
 of the form 
 
 72 7 
 
 If x and y are small we may put 
 
 where a, /?, y are constants. 
 
 Making these substitutions we have 
 
 T. D. 
 
130 DYNAMICS. 
 
 A -jjz + (p-a.)x-py--=X (i42) r 
 
 dy 
 
 *4 + (*-y)y-P*=* (143)- 
 
 The solution of (143) is 
 
 7 = 7 c b xdt' 
 
 D J o 
 
 substituting this value of y in equation (142) we get 
 
 We see by this equation that the effect on the first system 
 of its connexion with the second is to make the forces called 
 into play at any time by the displacement of the system 
 from its position of equilibrium depend not merely upon the 
 displacement of the system at that time but also upon the 
 previous displacements, and that a displacement x lasting for 
 a short time r produces after a time T a force TX$ (T) 
 where 
 
 02 _ (<L-V) T 
 
 T 
 
 Neesen ("Elastiche Nachwirkung bei Torsion," Berlin 
 Monatsberichte, Feb. 12, 1874, p. 141) has shown that the 
 assumption that \l/ (T) is proportional to C kT agrees with his 
 experiments on the twisting of wires. Boltzmann (Sitz. der 
 k. Akad. zu Wien, 70, p. 275, 1874) works out a theory 
 where \jr (T) is proportional to i IT. 
 
 In many cases we are given the forces at the time f and 
 not the displacement, and in these, equation (145) is not 
 convenient. If as is generally the case the motion is so slow 
 that we may neglect the effects of inertia, then we have 
 
RESIDUAL EFFECTS. 131 
 
 so that 
 
 and therefore 
 
 where = ~ 
 
 and thus when the external force is removed 
 /3 2 
 
 /3 2 ft 
 *=,, v. I 
 
 *0*- a ) Jo 
 
 If the primary machine had been connected with several 
 secondaries instead of with only one, we should have, if the 
 displacements are given 
 
 2 ~ y 
 
 and if the forces are given 
 
 where TJT is written for /3 2 / (/A a) 2 , and the sum taken 
 for all the secondary systems. This is the general expression 
 for the residual effect in terms of the forces acting on the 
 system when it was under constraint. 
 
 If we cannot neglect the inertia of the secondary system 
 we must introduce the term BcPyldf into equation (143) so 
 that that equation becomes 
 
 92 
 
132 DYNAMICS. 
 
 of which the solution corresponding to (144) is 
 
 where \ and \ a are the roots of the equation 
 jB\ 2 + b\ + a - y = o. 
 
 Thus the introduction of inertia into the secondary 
 system does not change the form of the solution, it only 
 introduces fresh terms of the same type as those which 
 previously existed, and the general solution is of the form 
 
 where c is a constant which depends on the constitution of 
 the secondary system but not upon x. This is the general 
 expression for the residual effect in terms of the initial 
 displacements. 
 
 65. In those cases in which residual effects occur we 
 may suppose that the secondary systems which are affected 
 by the changes in the primary are the molecules of the body 
 which is the seat of the phenomenon or a portion of such 
 molecules. For example in the case of the residual charge 
 of the Leyden jar we may look upon the electrical system 
 as the primary system and the system consisting of the 
 molecules of the glass as the secondary system, and may 
 suppose that during the actions of the electromotive force 
 on the glass, the arrangement of the molecules of the glass 
 suffers gradual changes which react upon the electric dis- 
 placement. 
 
MAXWELL ON THE " CONSTITUTION OF BODIES." 1-33 
 
 The following extract from Clerk-Maxwell's article on 
 the "Constitution of Bodies" in the Encyclopedia Britannica 
 is most instructive on this point. 
 
 "We know that the molecules of all bodies are in motion. 
 In gases and liquids the motion is such that there is nothing 
 to prevent any molecule from passing from any part of the 
 mass to any other part ; but in solids we must suppose that 
 some, at least, of the molecules merely oscillate about a 
 certain mean position, so that if we consider a certain group 
 of molecules, its configuration is never very different from a 
 certain stable configuration about which it oscillates. 
 
 "This will be the case even when the solid is in a state of 
 strain provided the amplitude of the oscillations does not 
 exceed a certain limit, but if it exceeds this limit the group 
 does not tend to return to its former configuration but 
 begins to oscillate about a new configuration of stability, 
 the strain in which is either zero or at least less than in the 
 original configuration. 
 
 "The condition of this breaking up of a configuration 
 must depend partly on the amplitude of the oscillations and 
 partly on the amount of strain in the original configuration \ 
 and we may suppose that ditferent groups of molecules, 
 even in a homogeneous solid, are not in similar circumstances 
 in this respect. 
 
 "Thus we may suppose that in a certain number of 
 groups the ordinary agitation of the molecules is liable to 
 accumulate so much that every now and then the configura- 
 tion of one of the groups breaks up, and this whether 
 it is in a state of strain or not. We may in this case assume 
 that in every second a certain proportion of these groups 
 break up and assume configurations corresponding to a 
 strain uniform in all directions. 
 
134 DYNAMICS. 
 
 " If all the groups were of this kind, the medium would 
 be a viscous fluid. 
 
 " But we may suppose that there are other groups, the 
 configuration of which is so stable that they will not break 
 up under the ordinary agitation of the molecules unless the 
 average strain exceeds a certain limit, and this limit may be 
 different for different systems of these groups. 
 
 "Now if such groups of greater stability are disseminated 
 through the substance in such abundance as to build up a 
 solid framework, the substance will be a solid which will 
 not be permanently deformed except by a stress greater 
 than a certain given stress. 
 
 "But if the solid also contains groups of smaller stability 
 and also groups of the first kind which break up of them- 
 selves, then when a strain is applied the resistance to it will 
 gradually diminish as the groups of the first kind break up, 
 and this will go on till the stress is reduced to that due to 
 the more permanent groups. If the body is now left to 
 itself, it will not at once return to its original form but will 
 only do so when the groups of the first kind have broken up 
 so often as to get back to their original state of strain. 
 
 " This view of the constitution of a solid, as consisting of 
 groups of molecules some of which are in different circum- 
 stances from others, also helps to explain the state of the 
 solid after a permanent deformation has been given to it. 
 In this case some of the less stable groups have broken up 
 and assumed new configurations, but it is possible that others 
 more stable may retain their original configurations, so that 
 the form of the body is determined by the equilibrium 
 between these two sets of groups ; but if on account of rise 
 of temperature, increase of moisture, violent vibration, or 
 any other cause, the breaking up of the less stable groups is 
 facilitated, the more stable groups may again assert their sway 
 
RESIDUAL EFFECTS. S 135 
 
 and tend to restore the body to the shape it had before its 
 deformation." 
 
 66. Let us now apply equation (146) to a definite case. 
 Let us suppose that the force X l acts on the system from 
 /= o to t= T^ and that from /= 2* to /= T 2 , the force - X 9 
 acts, then we have by equation (146) 
 
 = w 
 
 J 
 
 - k V-^ Xdf 
 
 */ l Tl 
 
 If the primary system is connected with several seconda- 
 ries instead of one then we have 
 
 {-^-n)- -*(*- 21)}.. .(148). 
 
 , 
 
 We see from equation (147) that if we have only one 
 secondary x will never change sign, but that the system will 
 return slowly to its position of equilibrium and never get 
 beyond it whatever may have been its previous history. We 
 know however that in the case of residual torsion of glass 
 fibres and the residual charge of a Leyden jar the residual 
 effects may be made to change sign. Thus if we give a fibre 
 a strong twist in the positive direction for some considerable 
 time and then a twist in the negative direction for a short 
 time, the residual torsion after the twisting couple is taken 
 off may be first in the negative and then in the positive 
 direction. This is sometimes expressed by saying that the 
 residual charges come out in the inverse order to that in 
 which they went in. 
 
136 DYNAMICS. 
 
 If there are only two values of /, k v and / 2 , then since 
 
 x = 6~ V f* mXcWdf +-*** ('mX&Jdt (149) 
 
 Jo Jo 
 
 and since after the external force is removed 
 
 /: 
 
 is not a function of /, we see that the sign of the residual 
 effect can only change once however complicated the 
 alternations in the signs of the twists or electrifications 
 previously applied to the system may have been. 
 
 Dr John Hopkinson represented the residual charge of 
 a Leyden jar by a formula of the same type as (149) (see 
 Chrystal's art. Electricity, Encyclopedia Britannica, p. 40) 
 and he showed that for the formula to agree with his 
 experiments on the residual charge in glass it was necessary 
 to take more than two values of k. Now when we included 
 the effects of the inertia of the secondary system we got two, 
 but only two values of k for each secondary, so that as we 
 have to introduce more terms than two to represent the 
 residual effect in glass we must have more than one second- 
 ary system. This is an indication that glass is not a homo- 
 geneous substance but a mixture of different silicates. 
 
 According to Neesen (loc. cit) the residual effects of 
 torsion in silk and guttapercha fibres can be represented 
 by a single term of the form c*~ k *. 
 
 67. We shall now investigate another effect due to the 
 same cause as the residual effect but of a different kind. 
 This is the effect of the secondary system on the way in 
 which the free vibrations of the primary die away. 
 
 Using the same notation as before and neglecting the 
 inertia of the secondary system we have for the free vibra- 
 tions the equation 
 
RESIDUAL EFFECTS. 137 
 
 or say 
 
 eliminating y we have 
 
 As this is a linear equation let us assume that x varies 
 as e^, then/ is given by the equation 
 
 or A ? JF < f = ip^t- 
 
 The right hand side of this equation is small, and if the 
 residual effect does not produce a large change in the period 
 of vibration we may on the right hand side of the equation 
 substitute for/ its value when there is no secondary system, 
 i.e. i {p-/A}* and for ', a ; making these substitutions we have 
 
 A A a 2 + 
 or p~i\^-\ 
 
 So that if /5 2 be small 
 
 . I/*' 
 
 - ' G 
 
138 DYNAMICS. 
 
 And thus the real part of p is approximately 
 
 i W 
 2 Aa 2 + nl> 2 ' 
 
 the amplitude of the vibrations of x are thus given by the 
 expression 
 
 where exp (x) = e x . 
 
 So that the ratio of the amplitudes of two successive 
 swings is 
 
 where T is the time of a complete oscillation, and is 
 given by the equation, 
 
 T 27r{A/fj} 2 approximately. 
 
 Substituting this value of T in (151) we get for the ratio 
 of the two amplitudes the expression 
 
 exp 
 r 
 
 / 
 
 ( 
 
 \ 
 
 ~j~ . 
 Aa 2 + fib 2 ) 
 
 Now if the motion of x were resisted by a frictional 
 force proportional to the velocity, the equation for x would 
 
 be 
 
 d 2 x dx 
 
 the solution of which is 
 
 _\t , , A 2 \2 
 >S \V4~4^Tv 
 where C and c are constants. 
 
 The ratio of the amplitudes of two successive swings 
 in this case is 
 
 ' \T\ 
 
 2AJ ' 
 
RESIDUAL EFFECTS. 139 
 
 or approximately 
 
 When the decrease in the amplitude is due to the 
 connexion with the secondary system, the ratio of two 
 successive amplitudes is 
 
 :so that the logarithmic decrement when the resistance is 
 frictional varies as 
 
 when it is due to the secondary system it varies as 
 
 Hence we see that if the mass of the vibrating body is 
 altered, the variation of the logarithmic decrement will be 
 less in this case than it would if the decay in the oscillations 
 were due to friction. This agrees with the results of Sir 
 William Thomson's experiments on the decay of the tor- 
 sional vibrations of wire, as he found that the loss was 
 greater with the longer periods than that calculated ac- 
 cording to the law of square roots from its amount in the 
 experiment with shorter periods. In fact if A were much 
 smaller than /^ 2 /# 2 the rate of decay would be increased 
 instead of diminished by increasing the vibrating mass, as 
 ihe rate of decay has its maximum value when A 
 
CHAPTER IX. 
 
 INTRODUCTORY TO THE STUDY OF REVERSIBLE 
 SCALAR PHENOMENA. 
 
 68. So far we have been dealing with phenomena in 
 which as in ordinary dynamics the quantities concerned 
 were mainly of a vector character. We shall now how- 
 ever go on to consider phenomena when the quantities- 
 we have to deal with are chiefly scalar, such as the 
 phenomena of evaporation, dissociation, chemical combi- 
 nation, etc. where the quantities which have to be considered 
 are such things as temperature, vapour density, or the num- 
 ber of molecules in a particular state. The chief difference 
 between these cases and those we have been considering is 
 that in these we have as in the kinetic theory of gases to- 
 deal chiefly with the average values of certain quantities and 
 cannot attempt to follow the variations of the individual 
 members which make up the average, while in the previous 
 cases we have been able to follow in all detail the changes 
 in most of the quantities introduced. In these new 
 cases all that we can get by the application of the Hamil- 
 tonian principle are relations between the averages of a series 
 of quantities ; as however these averages are all that we can 
 
SCALAR PHENOMENA. 141 
 
 observe in these cases, this limitation is not serious from a 
 practical point of view. 
 
 The relations we shall deduce are those which exist 
 when the body is in a steady state. 
 
 69. The systems we shall have to consider are portions 
 of matter in the solid, liquid or gaseous state, and consist, 
 according to the molecular theory of bodies, of a very large 
 number of secondary systems or molecules. Now we can 
 control a primary system in many ways, we can fix its geo- 
 metrical position, we can within certain limits strain it in any 
 way we please, we may establish electric currents or electric 
 displacements through it, and if the body is magnetic we 
 can magnetize it within the limits of saturation : so that the 
 coordinates fixing the geometrical, the strain, the electric 
 and the magnetic configurations are under our control and 
 have therefore been called ( 46) controllable coordinates. 
 
 The coordinates fixing the positions of the several 
 secondary systems are not however within our control and 
 we have not the power of altering any one of them ; v/e 
 have called these unconstrainable coordinates. 
 
 70. When we say that a system consisting of a great 
 number of molecules is in a steady state we mean that the 
 state is steady with respect to the controllable coordinates 
 and make no supposition as to whether it is so or not with 
 respect to the unconstrainable ones, all that we shall assume 
 is that the mean values which we can observe and which 
 depend upon the unconstrainable coordinates are steady. 
 
 Thus when the system is in a steady state the velocity of 
 each controllable coordinate must be constant, and if the 
 coordinate enters explicitly into the expression for either 
 the kinetic or potential energy, that is if the coordinate is 
 not a " kinosthenic " or speed one, the velocity must vanish. 
 
142 DYNAMICS. 
 
 71. We shall now proceed to prove that when a system 
 consisting of a great number of molecules is in a steady state 
 the mean value of the Lagrangian function has a stationary 
 value so long as the velocities of the controllable coordinates 
 are not altered. 
 
 Let us denote the controllable speed coordinates by the 
 symbol q^ the controllable positional coordinates by q a and 
 the unconstrainable coordinates by ^ 3 , then we have by the 
 Calculus of Variation 
 
 f 
 I 
 
 Jt 
 
 /</Z d dL\ ^{ h ( dL d d 
 
 ( -- -r -7T- }oq 2 dt + 2, I ( - -- -r; -p 
 t,\dq 2 dtdqj 4 Wa dt dq 
 
 Remembering Lagrange's Equations we see that this 
 equation reduces to 
 
 Let us suppose that the symbol of variation refers to a 
 disturbed motion in which the values of the controllable 
 coordinates are slightly altered while the velocities of the 
 speed coordinates remain unaltered and constant during the 
 disturbed as well as the undisturbed motion. 
 
 We shall for the sake of greater clearness consider the 
 three terms on the right-hand side of equation (152) 
 separately, as the considerations which apply to them are 
 different in each case. 
 
 72. Let us first take the term 
 
SCALAR PHENOMENA. 143 
 
 Since we suppose that in the disturbed motion the velocities 
 of the speed coordinates are unaltered q } is always zero,, 
 and thus the term we are considering vanishes. 
 
 73. We shall now show that the term 
 
 also vanishes. Since q 2 is not a speed coordinate it must 
 enter explicitly into the expression Z, so that when the 
 motion is steady the velocities of coordinates of this class, 
 vanish. The terms in Z which contain the velocities of 
 positional coordinates always vanish when the motion is 
 steady. They do not therefore contribute anything to the 
 mean value of Z, and so we may without loss of generality 
 suppose that the coefficients of terms in the kinetic energy 
 involving the velocities of positional coordinates are all zero 
 
 and that therefore - may be put equal to zero. In this 
 
 way we may see that the terms we are considering in the 
 expression for the variation of the mean value of the La- 
 grangian function vanish. 
 
 74. To show that the terms 
 
 vanish we must use the reasoning given by Clausius in his 
 paper "On the Second Axiom of the Mechanical Theory of 
 Heat," Phil. Mag. XLII. p. 178. 
 
 Let us in the first place consider what the coordinates 
 denoted by q 3 are. They are coordinates fixing the 
 position of the molecules of the system and may be 
 
144 DYNAMICS. 
 
 divided into two classes : firstly, coordinates fixing the 
 position of the centres of mass of the molecules, and 
 secondly, coordinates fixing the position of the molecules 
 relatively to their centres of mass. The motion of the latter 
 coordinates will be periodic, while that of the former will not 
 be so ; in consequence however of the frequent collisions 
 between the molecules their direction of motion will be 
 continually reversed, so that if the position of a molecule be 
 arbitrarily changed the distance between the disturbed and 
 the undisturbed positions will not increase indefinitely with 
 the time, the difference will sometimes be positive, some 
 times negative, but will fluctuate between limits which do 
 not increase with the time. Thus if q^ is a coordinate of 
 this kind 
 
 will fluctuate between positive and negative values which do 
 not increase with the interval / - t r 
 
 The same reasoning will apply with still greater force to 
 those coordinates which fix the configuration of a molecule 
 relatively to its centre of mass, for these coordinates will 
 oscillate and therefore the part of 
 
 depending upon these coordinates will fluctuate between 
 limits which do not increase as the time /, - / increases. 
 
 Now any change which we have the power to produce 
 in any of the coordinates fixing the system will, since the 
 motion is steady, produce a change in each term of 
 
MODIFIED LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION. 145 
 
 which will increase proportionately to the increase in the 
 interval t l -t Q \ and thus if we integrate over a sufficiently 
 long interval we may neglect any terms on the right hand 
 side of equation (152) which fluctuate between fixed values 
 and therefore as far as coordinates of the kind q z are 
 concerned put 
 
 when the interval / t - / is sufficiently long. 
 
 We have seen however that this is also true as far as the 
 variations of the other coordinates q^ q 2 are concerned, 
 so that when the motion is steady we have 
 
 where L denotes the mean value of L taken over unit time, 
 e.g. one second, and where the variations are such as could 
 be produced by slightly altering the values of the coordi- 
 nates. We may conclude that one second is a sufficiently 
 long interval over which to integrate since according to the 
 molecular theory of gases there are both a great many 
 collisions and a great many vibrations in this period. 
 
 75. In the above investigation we have supposed 
 that the Lagrangian function Z is expressed in terms 
 of the velocities of the coordinates and the proof is only 
 valid when it is so expressed and does not hold when the 
 velocities corresponding to some coordinates are elimi- 
 nated and the momenta corresponding to them introduced 
 instead. 
 
 We can prove however in this case that the modified 
 Lagrangian function ( n) is stationary when the system is 
 in a state of steady motion. 
 
 For let L' be the modified Lagrangian function and q a 
 T. D. 10 
 
146 DYNAMICS. 
 
 coordinate whose velocity has not been eliminated, then L 
 is a function of q, q... and the momenta corresponding to 
 the other coordinates, and since 
 
 d_ d^_ _ dL = 
 
 dt dq dq 
 
 we have by the Calculus of Variations 
 
 where p is the momentum corresponding to one of the 
 eliminated coordinates. We can prove exactly as before 
 that the right hand side of equation (154) vanishes for all 
 variations in which the momenta corresponding to the 
 eliminated coordinates remain unaltered. 
 
 Thus we have in all cases an equation of the form 
 
 8Z=o, 
 
 where L is the mean value of the ordinary Lagrangian 
 function or its modified form according as it does not or 
 does contain the momenta corresponding to some of the 
 coordinates. 
 
 76. In the physical applications of this principle it 
 would sometimes be difficult to tell whether a symbol 
 occurring in L represented a momentum or a velocity. 
 Fortunately however this knowledge is unnecessary if we 
 calculate the Lagrangian function from the forces required 
 to preserve equilibrium. For when the system is in a 
 steady state, X the force of type x which must be applied 
 to maintain equilibrium is given by 
 
 dL 
 
 X= ~-d X ' 
 
 where L is the Lagrangian function or its modified form 
 according as the kinetic energy does not or does contain the 
 momenta corresponding to some of the coordinates. So 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION. 147 
 
 that by what we have just proved 
 
 -ZSJXdxdt .................. (155), 
 
 the sum being taken for all the coordinates and X expressed 
 in terms of them, is the expression for the terms depending 
 on the controllable coordinates in a function which possesses 
 the property of having a stationary value when the system 
 to which it refers is in a steady state. 
 
 77. Thus to take an example let us consider the case 
 of a heavy particle whose mass is m attached to a fixed 
 point by a string whose length is /, and moving so that 
 the string makes a constant angle & with the vertical. The 
 kinetic energy of the system is 
 
 where < is the angle which the plane containing the string 
 and a vertical line makes with some fixed plane. The couple 
 which must act on the system to keep & constant is 
 
 - mP sin & cos $(j> 2 . 
 
 When the system is acted on by gravity the potential 
 energy is mgl cos S so that the Lagrangian function is 
 
 \ml 2 sin 2 3< 2 + mgl cos 3 
 which may be written 
 
 - $dO + mgl cos S 
 
 and this possesses the property of being stationary. 
 
 If however the Lagrangian function is expressed in 
 terms of 3> the momentum corresponding to < and given by 
 the equation 
 
 $ = mP sin 2 $<j> 
 
 the Lagrangian function becomes 
 
 ^ 2 < 2 cosec 2 3- + mgl cos &, 
 
 and this expression is not stationary. 
 
 10 2 
 
148 DYNAMICS. 
 
 The function which possesses this property is the 
 "modified" Lagrangian function 
 
 ' - <1> 2 cosec 2 S + mgl cos S. 
 
 2ml 2 
 
 Since however when expressed in terms of 6 and < 
 equals 
 
 I 2 COS S 
 
 ~^? sin 2 3' 
 
 we see that the " modified " Lagrangian function again 
 equals 
 
 - \dO + mgl cos S. 
 Thus the expression 
 
 is stationary however may be expressed, whether in terms 
 of <j> or <. 
 
 This example illustrates the principle that if we calculate 
 the Lagrangian function from the forces necessary to pre- 
 serve equilibrium we need not consider whether it is ex- 
 pressed in terms of velocities or momenta. 
 
 78. If we consider the proof by which the equation 
 
 was established we shall notice one point which we must 
 continually bear in mind when we are calculating the value 
 of the potential energy. 
 
 By the Calculus of Variations 
 
 dL 
 
 PI T ,, f'i (dL d dL} (dL 
 
 Ldt=\ <-j -T.-JT-I fydt + 2 ( -=- . 
 
 It, !t, \dq dt dq } y \dq 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION. 149 
 
 and thus if equation (156) holds we must have 
 dl^_d_ dL_ 
 dq dt dq 
 
 Now in ordinary Rigid Dynamics perhaps the most 
 usual form of Lagrange's equation is 
 
 d_ dJL_dJ^_ 
 dt dq dq ~ V> 
 
 where Q is the external force of type q tending to increase 
 this coordinate. In this case L = T - V where V is the 
 potential energy when the coordinates have their assigned 
 value and the system is free from the action of external 
 forces. If however we are to use equation (153) we must 
 put L = T V where 
 
 that is we must add to the potential energy we are con- 
 sidering the potential energy of the system which produces 
 the external forces. 
 
 Lagrange's equation may now be written 
 
 and equation (153) is true. 
 
 Thus to take an example, in Electrostatics we often 
 assume that the potential energy V of unit volume of a 
 dielectric whose specific inductive capacity is K and through 
 which the electric displacements parallel to the axes of x, y. 
 z are respectively /j , h is 
 
 f {/+*+*} 
 
 and that the equations of equilibrium are 
 
 _ __ 
 
 df ' dg ' dh~ ' 
 
150 DYNAMICS. 
 
 where X, Y, Zare the components of the electromotive force 
 parallel to the axes of x, y, z respectively. 
 
 If however we wish to apply the theorem we are now 
 considering we must put 
 
 for then the equations of equilibrium are 
 
 dV _dV___dV_ 
 
 ~df~~4i~J/i~ ' 
 
 The necessity of choosing V so that the equations of 
 motion are of the form 
 
 d dT d 
 
 IfTj-T^-^^' 
 
 is one to which we must always be alive in dealing with this 
 subject. 
 
CHAPTER X. 
 
 THE CALCULATION OF THE MEAN LAGRANGIAN 
 FUNCTION. 
 
 79. SINCE we can observe and regulate the forces of the 
 types of the "controllable" coordinates we can determine 
 how they depend upon the values of these coordinates and 
 then by means of the expression (155) calculate all those 
 terms in the mean Lagrangian function which involve such 
 coordinates. There may however be some terms in the 
 Lagrangian function which do not involve these quantities 
 and if we require these we must determine them by other 
 considerations ; a large number of problems can however be 
 solved even though we do not know the values of these 
 terms. 
 
 To get some idea of the different kinds of terms which 
 may exist in the Lagrangian function let us consider the 
 energy of a system consisting of a large number of molecules. 
 In the expression for the energy we can calculate all the 
 terms involving the coordinates which fix the electric, 
 magnetic or elastic configuration of the system, and in the 
 terms depending upon the strain coordinates we may include 
 those terms which involve the average distance between the 
 molecules. There may however be some terms left which 
 
152 DYNAMICS. 
 
 each molecule contributes independently of its neighbours 
 and which do not involve any of the controllable coordinates. 
 The sum of these contributions will be proportional to the 
 number of the molecules and must also be a function of the 
 temperature, because the mean state of the system is fixed 
 by the controllable coordinates and the temperature, and the 
 mean kinetic energy must therefore be a function of these 
 quantities. By hypothesis the terms we are considering do 
 not involve the controllable coordinates, so that the only 
 quantity they can depend upon is the temperature. The 
 potential energy of the molecules may also contribute terms 
 to the Lagrangian function which do not involve the con- 
 trollable coordinates and which therefore we cannot calculate 
 by equation (155)- For the purposes for which we use the 
 Lagrangian function all that we require to know about it is 
 the change in its value when the system is changed in some 
 definite way. Now if we measure the amount of heat 
 absorbed or evolved when the change takes place and 
 know the change, if any, which takes place in the kinetic 
 energy, we can calculate the alteration in the part of the 
 potential energy which is independent of the controllable 
 coordinates. 
 
 The methods of calculating the mean value of the 
 Lagrangian function will be best illustrated by working out 
 some particular cases. Let us begin with that of a perfect 
 gas. 
 
 Mean value of the Lagrangian function for a perfect gas. 
 
 80. Let us suppose that unit mass of the gas is enclosed 
 in a cylinder furnished with a piston, whose distance from 
 the base of the cylinder is represented by the coordinate x, 
 then since the pressure of the gas is a force tending to alter 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION FOR A GAS. 153 
 
 the value of x, the mean Lagrangian function for the system 
 of molecules forming the gas must involve the coordinate x. 
 If H denotes the mean value of the Lagrangian function 
 of the system, the mean value of the force of type x pro- 
 duced by the system when in a steady state is by Lagrange's 
 
 equations 
 
 dH 
 
 dx' 
 
 Since there is equilibrium between the pressure due to 
 the gas and the external pressure 
 
 dH 
 
 ^c= A *> 
 
 where / is the pressure of the gas and A the area of the 
 piston. 
 
 But if the gas obeys Boyle's law 
 
 Re 
 * m T' 
 
 where v is the volume of unit mass of the gas, the absolute 
 temperature and J? a constant such that RQ equals the 
 square of the velocity of sound in the gas. 
 Now 
 
 so that 
 
 dff_RB dv_ 
 
 dx v dx' 
 
 Integrating this equation we have in so far as H depends 
 upon v and 0, 
 
 (157), 
 
 where v is an arbitrary constant and /(0) an arbitrary func- 
 tion of 0, which does not involve x. It corresponds to the 
 
154 DYNAMICS. 
 
 part of the kinetic energy which depends entirely upon un- 
 constrainable coordinates. We shall find in the course of 
 this work that a great many problems can be solved without 
 a knowledge of the value of / (0). As far as f (0} is linear 
 it may be included in the first term, as we may regard v as 
 quite arbitrary. 
 
 The expression (157) will give the value of the mean 
 Lagrangian function so far as it involves x, it also includes 
 that part of the kinetic energy which is expressed entirely in 
 terms of unconstrainable coordinates, for this can be included 
 in the term f(6) ; to complete its value we must subtract 
 from it w the potential energy of unit mass of the gas when 
 its particles are infinitely distant from each other, as this is 
 the part of the potential energy which depends upon uncon- 
 trollable coordinates. 
 
 Thus for unit mass of the gas 
 
 or if p be the density of the gas 
 
 H=RQ log Po 
 p 
 
 We shall see later on, when we consider the phenomenon 
 of evaporation, that f(0) is of the form 
 
 AO + 0\ogO .................. (158). 
 
 The value of H for a mass m of gas whose density is p 
 is given by the equation 
 
 ff=m0log^ + mf(6)-mw ......... (159). 
 
 P 
 
 This is the Lagrangian function for the gas itself; when 
 an external pressure acts upon it we must add to this value 
 the mean Lagrangian function of the system producing the 
 pressure. We may suppose that this system is a weight 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION FOR A SOLID. 155 
 
 placed upon the piston, the variable part of the potential 
 energy of this is, if V be the volume occupied by the gas 
 
 pv. 
 
 So that its mean Lagrangian function is 
 
 -pv 
 
 and the Lagrangian function of the two systems is therefore 
 
 mRQ log'' + mf(Q)-mw-pV ......... (160). 
 
 P 
 
 Mean value of the Lagrangian function for a liquid or solid. 
 
 81. We must now proceed to find the mean value If of 
 the Lagrangian function for a liquid or solid. Let us suppose 
 that we have a piston whose distance from a fixed plane is 
 x pressing upon a bar of the substance. 
 
 Then we have by Lagrange's equations when the motion 
 is steady 
 
 dH 
 
 = mean force tending to increase x. produced by 
 
 the substance, 
 so that 
 
 dp 
 
 where p is the pressure required to balance this force and a 
 the area of the cross section of the bar. The differential 
 coefficient dpIdQ is obtained on the supposition that the 
 volume is constant. 
 
 Since adx = dv, 
 
 fdp\ 
 we have ^ ,- = ( -^ ) 
 
 d6dv \dO) v constant 
 
156 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Thus 
 
 dv 
 
 v constant 
 
 where ft is the mean value of (dpIdO) between zero and 0. 
 Thus H= 
 
 = Oy + S l (0) say. 
 
 Where / (0) is an arbitrary function of the temperature, 
 it .is unnecessary to add an arbitrary function of v on 
 integration as this will be included in the potential energy 
 due to strain. 
 
 If the mass of the substance is unity 
 
 a 
 
 where o- is the density, so that in the expression for H 
 for unit mass of the substance there are the terms 
 
 From this we must subtract w' the potential energy 
 of unit mass of the substance. Thus in the Lagrangian 
 function for a mass m of the substance there are the terms 
 
 f " B 
 - mO I da- + ;/// (0) - mw . 
 
 " 
 
 If there is any external pressure we must add to this 
 the expression for the mean value of the Lagrangian 
 function of the system producing this pressure. This, as 
 in the case of the gas, will be 
 
 -pV, 
 
 where p is the external pressure and V the volume of the 
 solid or liquid. Adding this term we get 
 
 -pr' (161). 
 
LAGRANGIAN FUNCTION FOR A SOLID. 157 
 
 It must be remembered that we have only calculated 
 the value of the Lagrangian function in the simplest case 
 when the body is in a steady state, when it is free from all 
 strain except that inseparable from the body at the tempe- 
 rature we are considering, and when it is neither electrified 
 nor magnetized. The change in the Lagrangian function 
 due to any additional strain or to electrification or mag- 
 netization can be at once determined by finding the energy 
 required to establish this particular condition. For example, 
 the change in H produced by statical electrification equals 
 minus the potential energy of the electrical distribution, the 
 change due to any system of electric currents flowing through 
 solids or liquids is the kinetic energy due to this distribution 
 of currents, and can be calculated by the ordinary formulae 
 of electrokinetics. 
 
 82. The problems which we shall now proceed to 
 solve, making use of the principle that the mean value of 
 the Lagrangian function is stationary, are those which can 
 often be solved on thermodynamical principles by using 
 the condition that the value of the entropy of the system 
 is stationary. The value of H must therefore be closely 
 connected with that of the entropy, and in fact we see 
 from its value for a perfect gas in equilibrium under 
 external pressure that, with the exception of the term p V, 
 those terms in H which depend upon the controllable 
 coordinates occur also in the expression for the entropy. It 
 seems however preferable to use the function H which has a 
 direct dynamical significance, rather than the entropy which 
 depends upon other than purely dynamical considerations. 
 
CHAPTER XI. 
 
 EVAPORATION. 
 
 83. WE shall now go on to apply the principle that the 
 value of H is stationary to solve some special problems in 
 Physics. The first problem we shall consider is that _of 
 finding the state of equilibrium when a given mass of some 
 liquid is placed in a closed vessel from which the air has 
 been exhausted; some of the liquid will be vaporized and 
 we wish to find how far the vaporization will proceed 
 before equilibrium is obtained. This of course is equivalent 
 to finding the density of a vapour when in equilibrium in 
 presence of the liquid. 
 
 Let v, v' be the volumes occupied by the vapour and 
 liquid respectively, the mass of the vapour, 17 that of the 
 liquid, the rest of the notation being the same as that used 
 in 80 and 81. 
 
 Then assuming that the vapour obeys Boyle's law we 
 see from equation (158) that the vapour contributes to the 
 expression for H for the whole system the terms 
 
 io g + &(0) - &> (162), 
 
 since p the density of the vapour equals /z/. 
 
EVAPORATION. 159 
 
 From equation (161) we see that the liquid when it is free 
 from surface tension, electrification and the like, furnishes 
 to the same expression the terms 
 
 -r)0 I -. 2 da- + r;/, (Q) - rjw' ( J 63). 
 
 Thus H the mean value of the Lagrangian function for 
 both the liquid and vapour is the sum of (162) and (163) so 
 that we have 
 
 H = IRQ log ^ + / (0) + ^ (6i) 
 
 - ^0 I *-td<T %w vfw r (164). 
 
 When there is equilibrium the value of H has by the 
 Hamiltonian principle (75) a stationary value, so that in 
 this state no small change can affect the value of the right 
 hand side of equation (164). 
 
 The small change which we shall suppose to take place 
 is that which occurs when the mass of the vapour is 
 increased by a small amount S while the mass of the liquid 
 is diminished by the same amount. The change in H is 
 
 dH 
 %* 
 
 so that when there is equilibrium we have by the Hamil- 
 tonian principle 
 
 dH 
 
 ^r- 
 
 When 8 of the liquid is vaporized the volume of the 
 liquid diminishes by 8/<r so that we have 
 
 dif i 
 
160 DYNAMICS. 
 
 and since the volume of the vapour and liquid remains con- 
 stant 
 
 -(z, + z/) = o, 
 
 and therefore 
 
 dv i 
 
 Now 
 
 t + y - W + W 
 
 where for brevity y is written instead of 
 
 Substituting for dvjd^. its value we have 
 
 = ./?$ lO2f + C ~~ \W "W ) 4 
 
 dc, Vo" 
 
 where \f/ (0) is written for 
 
 a quantity which does not involve Since /z> = p we may 
 write (165) as 
 
 ^-JWtog& + *-( -0+W 
 
 Since dHld vanishes in the state of equilibrium we have 
 then 
 
 J?0 log & = - ^ + (w-w] - if/ (0) ...(166), 
 
 P (T 
 
 or p ~ p f. a e ^ 
 
 since p/cr is very small we may write this as 
 
 p=*0)- * (l6 7 ), 
 
 where <^> (0) is some function of 9. 
 
EVAPORATION. l6l 
 
 Bertrand (Thermodynamique, p. 93) has shown that the 
 results of Regnault's experiments on the vapour pressures 
 of different liquids can be represented by the following 
 expressions, / being the pressure in millimetres of mercury : 
 
 water; log/ = 17-44324 - 2795/0 - 3' 8682 log 0> 
 
 ether; log/ = 13 -42311 - 1729/0 - 1-9787 log 0, 
 
 alcohol; log/ = 21-44686 - 2743/0 - 4-2248 log 0, 
 chloroform; log/ = 19-29792 - 2179/0 - 3*91583 log 0, 
 bisulphide of carbon Iog/ = i2'58852 -1684/0- 1*7689 log 0. 
 
 This form of expression was originally used by Dupre. 
 (Theorie Mecanique de la Chaleur, p. 97.) 
 
 The coefficient of i/0 in each of these expressions is nearly 
 \\R, where X is the latent heat of the substance at the 
 absolute zero of temperature. This is the term (w - w')j6 
 in our expression (166) and w-w' is the latent heat at 
 absolute zero, hence by comparing the other terms in 
 these expressions we see that/(0) must be of the form 
 
 A6 + BQ log 0. 
 
 84. We can by the aid of the preceding formulae very 
 easily determine the effect upon the vapour pressure of any 
 slight change in the physical condition of the liquid or 
 vapour. 
 
 Let us suppose that the physical conditions are so 
 changed that the mean Lagrangian function exceeds the 
 value we have hitherto assumed for it by \. Then instead of 
 equation (167) we have evidently 
 
 RO log + R6 + \l/ (0) (w w") + - = o, 
 p cr dc, 
 
 so that Sp the change in the vapour density due to the cause 
 
 T. D. II 
 
162 DYNAMICS. 
 
 which produced the change x i n tne mean Lagrangian 
 function is given by the equation 
 
 or 
 
 so that if x increases with the vapour pressure in the state 
 of equilibrium is increased, while if x diminishes as 
 increases the equilibrium vapour pressure is diminished. 
 This very important principle is a particular case of the 
 more general one that ; when the physical environment of a 
 system is slightly changed and the consequent change in the mean 
 Lagrangian function increases as any physical process goes on, 
 then this process will have to go on further in the changed 
 system before equilibrium is reached than in the unchanged one, 
 while if the change in the mean Lagrangian function diminishes 
 as the process goes on it will not have to proceed so far. We 
 shall have numerous examples of this principle in the 
 course of the following pages. 
 
 85. Let us now consider the effect of surface tension 
 upon the vapour pressure. In order to take a definite case 
 let us suppose that the liquid is a spherical drop. It will 
 possess in consequence of surface tension potential energy 
 proportional to its area, and as the area of the drop 
 diminishes as the water evaporates the energy due to the 
 surface tension changes, and since anything which causes 
 the energy to change as evaporation goes on alters the state 
 of equilibrium, the vapour pressures when there is equi- 
 librium in this case cannot be the same as when evaporation 
 produces no change in the area and therefore no change in 
 the energy due to surface tension. 
 
EVAPORATION. 163 
 
 If a be the radius of the drop and T the energy per unit 
 area due to surface tension then in the expression for the 
 potential energy of the liquid there will be in addition to 
 the terms we have already considered the term 
 
 and therefore in the mean Lagrangian function for the liquid 
 and vapour the additional term 
 
 So that with our previous notation 
 
 x = -47ra 2 T. 
 i da ii dv' 
 
 NOW - -jr = -- , TT , 
 
 ad 3 z'' d% 
 and therefore = --- -,- , 
 
 da i 
 
 hence ^> = ~ 2" 
 
 df 4iKr<r 
 
 and therefore - = - . 
 
 at, aa- 
 
 So that if Sp be - the change in the vapour density pro- 
 duced by the surface tension we have by equation (168) 
 
 20 T I 
 
 and if 8^ be the change in the vapour pressure, since 
 
 8/ 
 we have by (170) 
 
 cr-p a 
 
 This agrees with the formula given by Sir William 
 Thomson in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of 
 
 II - 2 
 
1 64 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Edinburgh, Feb. 7, 1870, and quoted in Maxwell's Theory 
 of Heat, 5th edit. p. 290. 
 
 If we take the case of a drop of water -^ of a millimetre 
 in radius, then if the temperature is about ioC. we have 
 by (170), since RB for water vapour is about 1*3 x io 9 
 
 fy> = 200 ^ T 
 p ~ 1-3 x io 9 
 
 since T '- 81 we have 
 
 -- = 1*2 X I0~ 5 . 
 P 
 
 We see that the energy due to surface tension makes 
 the Lagrangian function increase as evaporation goes on, 
 so that by the principle given at the end of 84, the effect 
 of it will be to make evaporation go on further than it 
 otherwise would. 
 
 If we have the water in narrow capillary tubes then 
 when it evaporates the area of the surface of contact of the 
 tube with water is diminished but that of the surface of 
 contact of the tube with air is increased. Since the surface 
 tension of the surface of separation of the tube and air is 
 greater than that of the tube and water, the potential energy 
 due to surface tension increases as evaporation goes on, 
 thus the mean Lagrangian function diminishes as the liquid 
 evaporates, so that by the principle of 84 the effect of 
 surface tension in this case will be to stop evaporation 
 and promote condensation. We can easily shew that if a is 
 the radius of the tube then in this case 
 
 <r p a 
 
 86. Effect of a charge of electricity on the 
 vapour pressure. We can by the use of formula (168) 
 
EVAPORATION. 165 
 
 find the effect on the vapour density of electrifying the liquid. 
 If the charge e is given to the liquid which we shall suppose 
 spherical and of radius a, the potential energy is increased 
 
 by 
 
 I _ 2 
 
 *K~a' 
 
 where K is the specific inductive capacity of the surrounding 
 medium. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function of the liquid and its 
 vapour is diminished by this amount. Blake's experiments 
 on the evaporation of electrified liquids (Wiedemann's 
 Ekktricitat) iv. p. 1212) show that e remains constant as the 
 liquid evaporates, in other words that the vapour proceeding 
 from the electrified liquid is not electrified. Thus the new 
 term e 2 J2Ka in the mean Lagrangian function diminishes 
 as the liquid evaporates and therefore by the principle of 
 84 evaporation will not go on so far as before, that is 
 the vapour density when there is equilibrium will be 
 diminished by electrifying the liquid. 
 
 We can easily calculate by equation (168) the amount of 
 this diminution. 
 
 In this case 
 
 i e^ 
 
 X ~ 2K a' 
 
 , d\ i e 2 da 
 
 and therefore jj=-,j&#-> 
 
 substituting the value of dald given by (169) we have 
 
 dx i e 2 
 
 d 87rA" a* a- ' 
 
 so that if Sp be the change in the vapour density produced 
 by the electrification we have by (168) 
 
1 66 DYNAMICS. 
 
 To calculate the magnitude of this effect let us suppose 
 K= i ; then e/a 2 is the electric force just outside the sphere, 
 and this cannot exceed a certain value, otherwise the insu- 
 lating power of the air would break down and the electricity 
 escape. The maximum value of e/a 2 when the sphere is 
 surrounded by air at the atmospheric pressure is about 120 
 in electrostatic measure : and as o- is unity, p a small fraction, 
 the maximum alteration in the vapour density will be given 
 by the equation 
 
 So i 
 
 ' 
 
 now RB for water vapour at ioC. is about 1*3 x io 9 , so 
 that 
 
 this value will be independent of the size of the drop. 
 Comparing equations (170) and (172) we see that the 
 maximum effect due to electrification is about equal in 
 magnitude though opposite in sign to that due to a curvature 
 of 1/4 of a centimetre. 
 
 The effect of electrification is to diminish the vapour 
 density when there is equilibrium between the liquid and 
 the vapour, it therefore increases the tendency of the 
 vapour to deposit on the liquid. We should therefore 
 expect an electrified drop of rain to be larger than an 
 unelectrified one, so that this effect may help to produce 
 the large drops of rain which fall in thunderstorms. 
 
 87. Effect of an electric field upon the vapour 
 pressure. Electricity also produces an effect upon the 
 vapour pressure when the drop is not charged but merely 
 placed in an electric field. Let us suppose that the 
 field is due to a charge of electricity e collected at a point 
 
EVAPORATION. l6/ 
 
 P, let the radius of the drop of water which we shall 
 suppose spherical be a and let/ be the distance of the centre 
 from P. Then (Maxwell's Electricity and Magnetism, Vol. I. 
 p. 232), the potential energy due to the mutual action of the 
 electrified point and the drop of water is 
 
 so that the increase in the mean Lagrangian function is 
 
 and therefore by (168) the change Sp in the density of 
 the vapour when in a state of equilibrium is given by the 
 equation 
 
 Sp i (r i j 3 ^a 2 e 2 ^ "~> \da 
 
 7 = RV o--p ~K \ 2f 2 (f 2 ~a 2 ) + f*(J*-a*f I d ' 
 
 Substituting for dajdt; from (169) we have 
 
 3p_ i / (3 i a 2 I i 
 
 if # be small compared with / then approximately 
 
 p 
 
 Now ^/Ay 2 is the force at the centre of the drop due to 
 the electrified point, calling this F and remembering that <r 
 is large compared with p we have 
 
 so that the effect of electrification on a neighbouring body 
 is again to diminish the vapour density in the state of 
 equilibrium. The formula (173) will evidently hold even 
 though the field is not due to an electrified point provided 
 
1 68 DYNAMICS. 
 
 P the force at the drop does not vary much in a distance 
 comparable with the radius of the drop. 
 
 88. Effect of strain upon vapour pressure. 
 
 We shall now investigate how the vapour pressure depends 
 upon the state of compression of the liquid. Let us 
 suppose that the pressure p acts upon the liquid, then if k 
 be the modulus of resistance to compression, the potential 
 energy possessed by the liquid in virtue of this strain is 
 
 1/77 
 2 k <r' 
 so that 
 
 and therefore by equation (168) 
 
 p 2 R cr-p 
 
 or approximately 
 
 So i p 2 
 
 j-i&tx. ............ : ..... (I75) 
 
 for water k= 2-2 x io 10 , so that the effect on the vapour 
 pressure of the compression due to the pressure of icoo 
 atmospheres is at the temperature of i5C. given by 
 
 for ether the effect would be given by 
 
 = - approximately. 
 P 5 
 
 In the next paragraph we shall consider another effect 
 due to pressure which except for exceedingly large pressures 
 is larger than the one we have just been considering. 
 
EVAPORATION. 169 
 
 89. Effect of the presence of a gas having no 
 chemical action on the water vapour on the 
 equilibrium vapour pressure. It is generally believed 
 that the equilibrium vapour pressure of water depends only 
 upon the temperature of the water and not upon the pressure 
 produced by an indifferent gas, that it is for example the 
 same in a vacuum as under atmospheric pressure. If however 
 we remember that when a portion of the liquid evaporates 
 the air above it must expand and do work we shall see that 
 this cannot be the case, but that since evaporation is 
 accompanied by a diminution in the density of the air, and 
 therefore by an increase in its mean Lagrangian function, 
 it must by the principle of 84 go on further when air is 
 present than in a vacuum, so that the vapour density will be 
 increased by the presence of the air. We shall now go on 
 to investigate the magnitude of this increase and shall 
 consider two cases. In the first case we shall suppose that 
 the air and liquid are placed in a closed vessel whose 
 volume remains constant. 
 
 Let , 77, be the masses of the vapour, water, and air 
 respectively ; w, w lt w 2 , the mean potential energy of unit 
 mass of each of these substances respectively. 
 
 Then the mean Lagrangian function for the water vapour 
 is 
 
 ** log^ +/(*) -ft*, 
 
 where v is the volume of the vessel above the liquid. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the water is by 
 equation (161) 
 
 vyO + T//I W - w ; 
 
 and the mean Lagrangian function for the air is 
 
I/O DYNAMICS. 
 
 Thus when a quantity d of the liquid evaporates, since 
 dv I d= i/o-, the condition that dH '/ d% = o gives 
 
 RB log ^ 
 
 Now if 8/0 be the change in p due to the presence of the 
 air, 8w 1 the corresponding change in w l9 we have by this 
 equation 
 
 ROZp ROSp 6 
 
 ------ " + - +Sw. +2_j_ = ...... (176). 
 
 p a- (TV 
 
 The presence of the air will increase the pressure and so 
 cause the liquid to be more compressed than it would be if 
 the air were away, so that w 1 will be increased by the 
 presence of the air. If &? be the compression due to the 
 pressure /' of the air, and p the pressure due to the water 
 vapour, Sze/j will be proportional to (p +/') Be and unless the 
 pressure due to the air amounts to many thousands of 
 atmospheres this term will be very small compared with 
 
 (TV 
 
 which is equal to/'/o-. 
 
 Hence we may write equation (176) as 
 
 MSp ROZp p' 
 r 4. r + . = 
 
 p (T (T 
 
 or, since a is very large compared with p, 
 
 p <r 
 
 Now if S/ be the change in the pressure of the water 
 vapour due to the presence of the air 
 
 so that equation (177) becomes 
 
 8/_/ 
 p o- 
 
EVAPORATION. I /I 
 
 But if p is the density of steam when the pressure is /' 
 
 i I 
 
 ~ P ~ p" 
 
 so that equation (177) becomes 
 
 = p; 
 >" a- 
 
 and thus the alteration in the vapour pressure produced by an 
 external pressure of an atmosphere is given by the equation 
 
 & _ density of steam at atmospheric pressure 
 p density of water 
 
 = atoC. 
 
 1200 
 
 So that for each atmosphere of pressure the vapour 
 pressure of water is increased by about one part in twelve 
 hundred. For ether the increase would be about one part in 
 220. 
 
 90. The other case we shall consider is when the 
 pressure acting on the system remains constant. We shall 
 use the same notation as before. The only change we shall 
 have to make in the mean Lagrangian function is to add to 
 it that of the system producing the steady external pressure. 
 We may suppose in order to fix our ideas that this system is 
 a quantity of mercury placed on the piston, which may 
 be supposed to move vertically up and down, then if P be 
 the steady pressure per unit area the potential energy is 
 equal to 
 
 so that the mean Lagrangian function of this system is 
 
 -P(v+v'\ 
 where if is the volume of the liquid. 
 
I7 2 DYNAMICS. 
 
 ^ dH 
 
 \ he condition - = o 
 
 gives 
 
 M log - ^ + 
 
 Now 
 
 and i=/' 
 
 where/ and/' are the pressures due to the water vapour and 
 
 air respectively. 
 
 Since />=/ +p' 
 
 and 'J' = - 1 
 
 tff 07- 
 
 the above equation reduces to 
 
 RQ log ^-RQ +/(#) _/ x (0) -yO-(w- Wj + ^=0, 
 
 or if S/> be the change produced by the external pressure, 
 
 = 
 
 P o- 
 a similar result to the one we obtained before. 
 
 We see from this result that (apart from any other cause) 
 rain drops will form more easily when the barometer is low 
 than when it is high. 
 
 Regnault's experiments seem to show that the vapour 
 pressure in a vacuum is greater by nearly 5 per cent, than 
 when there is air at atmospheric pressure above the liquid 
 (Wullner's Lehrbuch der Physik, in. p. 703), but he attributed 
 this difference to the condensation of the liquid on the sides 
 
EVAPORATION. 1/3 
 
 of the vessel ; the absorption of the air by the liquid might also- 
 tend to produce an effect in this direction, though, as the 
 following investigation will show, to nothing like the extent 
 of 5 per cent. 
 
 91. Effect of absorbed air on the vapour 
 pressure. When the liquid contains some gas diffused 
 through its volume which remains behind when it evaporates, 
 the evaporation of the liquid will cause the volume occupied 
 by the gas to diminish and its density to increase. Thus by 
 (157) the mean value of its Lagrangian function will diminish 
 as evaporation goes on, so that by 84 the presence of the 
 gas dissolved throughout the volume will diminish the 
 equilibrium vapour pressure. 
 
 Let e be the mass of the dissolved gas, v' the volume of 
 the liquid in which it is dissolved, then the Lagrangian 
 function of the gas is 
 
 e^log^-ew'-K/W (178), 
 
 where w' is the intrinsic potential energy of unit mass of the 
 dissolved gas. 
 
 The expression (178) is the quantity we denoted by x i n 
 84. The only variable in x which involves is v and 
 dv'jd = - i/cr, so that we have 
 
 d x _ R'Oe 
 d v'cr 
 and therefore by (168) 
 
 ,-Sp i It'Qe , . 
 
 6-?- = - r (i79)- 
 
 p a- p V 
 
 If 8/ be the increase in the vapour pressure caused by the 
 dissolved gas, P the pressure this gas would produce 
 if it were free from the liquid and filled the volume z/, then 
 since 
 
1/4 DYNAMICS. 
 
 R'Qt 
 
 and - = P. 
 
 v 
 
 equation (179) may be written 
 
 tr-p 
 
 So that since p is very small compared with a- we have 
 approximately 
 
 or if/ be the vapour pressure, and p the density of steam at 
 the atmospheric pressure w, equation (180) may be written 
 
 ty = _pP 
 p a- TT 
 
 And since p' I <r is about i / 1200 we see that 
 
 / I200 
 
 where (/>) is the pressure P expressed in atmospheres. 
 
 The volumes of the various gases which one volume of 
 water will absorb at oC. under the pressure of 760 milli- 
 metres of mercury were determined by Bunsen and are given 
 in the following table : 
 
 Hydrogen '019 
 
 Nitrogen -0203 
 
 Air '0247 
 
 Carbonic Acid 179 
 
 Chlorine 3*0361 
 
 so that according to equation (180) the vapour pressure 
 of water saturated with air will be lowered by about one 
 part in 50,000, when saturated with carbonic acid by about i 
 part in 660 and when with chlorine by about i part in 400. 
 In this investigation we have assumed that the properties 
 of the liquid are not altered by the presence of the gas ; 
 if they are, then we must regard y and w' as functions of e, 
 and this would lead to the introduction of several additional 
 
EVAPORATION. 1/5 
 
 terms into- the equation for S/. We have assumed too that 
 the gas remains behind as the liquid evaporates, as in this 
 case the diminution of the vapour pressure is greater than if 
 some of the gas were to be set free when the liquid evapo- 
 rates. 
 
 92. The effect of dissolved salt on the vapour 
 pressure. Van J t Hoff (" L'equilibre chimique dans les 
 systemes gazeux ou dissous a Petat dilue," Archives Neer- 
 landais, xx. p. 239, 1886) has pointed out that Pfeffer's 
 experiments on the osmotic pressure produced by salts 
 dissolved in water (PfefTer, Osmotische Untersuchungen, 
 Leip/ig, 1877) and Raoult's experiments on the effect of 
 dissolved salts on the freezing point of solutions (Annales de 
 Chimie, 6 me serie, iv. p. 401). show that the molecules of a 
 salt in a dilute solution exert the same pressure as they 
 would exert if they were in the gaseous state at the same 
 temperature and occupying a volume equal to that of the 
 liquid in which the salt is dissolved, and that the pressure 
 exerted by these molecules obeys Boyle's and Gay Lussac's 
 law. This being so, the mean Lagrangian function for the 
 salt dissolved in the liquid is the same as that of an equal 
 mass of the salt in the gaseous state filling the volume 
 occupied by the liquid. Thus if the properties of the liquid 
 are not altered by the presence of the salt the results of the 
 preceding section will apply, and we shall have, supposing 
 that the salt remains behind when the liquid evaporates, 
 
 where cr is the density of the liquid, p the density of its 
 vapour at the atmospheric pressure, (P) the pressure in 
 atmospheres which would be exerted by the dissolved salt 
 if it were in the gaseous state. 
 
 Thus, for example, suppose that we have n grammes of 
 
i;6 DYNAMICS. 
 
 salt in a litre of the solvent, where n is the molecular 
 weight of the salt. This strength of solution is often called 
 for brevity a strength of one equivalent per litre. This 
 quantity of salt will by Avogadro's law produce the same 
 pressure as 2 grammes of hydrogen per litre, that is about 22 
 atmospheres ; if this quantity of salt were dissolved in water 
 it would by equation (181) since p/o- is about 1/1200 
 diminish the vapour pressure by about i part in 55, if it 
 were dissolved in ether, C 4 H 10 O, where p/o- is about 1/2 20,. 
 then the vapour pressure would be diminished by about i 
 part in 10, if it were dissolved in alcohol, C 2 H 6 O, where p/o- 
 is about 1/380, the vapour pressure would be reduced by 
 about one part in 17. We see from equation (181) that the 
 diminution in the vapour pressure is proportional to the 
 quantity of salt dissolved. We can also express the result of 
 this equation as follows. If P is the pressure due to one 
 equivalent in grammes of the salt dissolved in a kilogramme 
 of the solvent, then P/o; where o- is the density of the 
 solvent, is the pressure in atmospheres due to one equi- 
 valent of the salt dissolved in a litre of the solvent. Hence 
 
 P 2 
 
 - = J(density of hydrogen at atmospheric pressure.) So- 
 o- 10 
 
 that we may write equation (181) as 
 
 = (molecular weight of solvent) x i x io~ 3 , 
 
 where p is the diminution in vapour pressure when one 
 equivalent of the salt is dissolved in a kilogramme of the 
 solvent. Another way of expressing the same thing is that 
 when one equivalent of the salt is dissolved in 1000 
 equivalents of the solvent, i.e. in 1000 m grammes where 
 m is the molecular weight of the solvent, the diminution in 
 the vapour pressure amounts to i part in 1000, whatever 
 be the nature of the salt or solvent. 
 
VAPOUR PRESSURE. 
 *P P P 
 
 Since - , 
 
 or TT 
 
 and since P is directly, while p' is inversely, proportional to 
 the absolute temperature, we see that the ratio Bp/p ought to 
 be nearly independent of the temperature since o- only 
 varies very slowly with it. 
 
 93. In the preceding investigation we have assumed 
 that the properties of the solvent were unaltered by the 
 presence of the salt, and that all the solvent did was to 
 enable the salt to exist in a condition in which the 
 molecules were very far apart. 
 
 If however the properties of the solvent are altered by 
 the presence of the salt, then we must regard w as a function 
 of the quantity of salt dissolved. 
 
 In this case instead of equation (179) we shall have 
 
 K" " 8 "' 
 
 where W is the change in it/ produced by the presence of 
 the salt. 
 
 Now if s be the strength of the solution, i.e. the quantity 
 of salt in unit volume of the solvent, 
 
 dw' dw' 
 
 77 ~T S j , 
 
 arj aS 
 
 so that equation (182) becomes 
 
 dw' P 
 
 - s =- + ~ = o. 
 as o- 
 
 If the change in w is proportional to the strength of the 
 solution then 
 
 8w' s : o. 
 as 
 
 T. D. 12 
 
178 DYNAMICS. 
 
 In the general case the lowest power of s which occurs 
 in the expression 
 
 s , du* 
 
 OW S 7 
 
 ds 
 
 is the second, so that the effect produced by the alteration 
 of the properties of the solvent depends upon the squares 
 and higher powers of the concentration, while the effect we 
 investigated in the preceding section was proportional to 
 the first power, and therefore when the solution is dilute is 
 relatively the more important. 
 
 Raoult, Comptes Rendus 104, p. 1433, has recently found 
 that when one equivalent of a substance is dissolved in 100 
 equivalents of a solvent the vapour pressure is reduced by 
 1-05 parts in 100, which agrees very well with the results 
 we have just obtained. 
 
CHAPTER XII. 
 
 PROPERTIES OF DILUTE SOLUTIONS. 
 
 94. THE effect produced on the vapour pressure of any 
 solvent by dissolving other substances in it has been discussed 
 in the last chapter ; in this chapter we shall consider some 
 other properties possessed by dilute solutions. 
 
 Absorption of gases by liquids. Let us suppose 
 that we have a closed cylinder containing a gas and a liquid 
 and that we wish to find how much of the gas will be ab- 
 sorbed by the liquid. In this case we have four substances 
 to consider, 
 
 1. The liquid. 
 
 2. The vapour of the liquid. 
 
 3. The free gas. 
 
 4. The gas dissolved in the liquid. 
 
 The variation which we shall suppose to take place, and 
 which will not by the Hamiltonian principle alter the value 
 of H when the system is in equilibrium, is that corre- 
 sponding to the escape of a small quantity of gas from the 
 liquid. This will not affect the value of the mean Lagrangian 
 function of the vapour of the liquid, so that we may leave this 
 
 12 2 
 
l8o DYNAMICS. 
 
 out of account in solving this problem. Let the mass of the 
 liquid be 17, that of the free gas , and that of the absorbed 
 gas . Then using the same notation as we have hitherto 
 employed, the mean Lagrangian function for the liquid is 
 
 ............... ( l8 3), 
 
 for the free gas 
 
 &0 log?* + tf (&)-&, ............ (184), 
 
 for the dissolved gas 
 
 W ............ (185), 
 
 where v is the volume occupied by the free gas, and v' the 
 volume of the liquid or that occupied by the dissolved gas, 
 and where w and f'(6) are the quantities for the dissolved 
 gas which correspond to w and/(#) for the free gas. If we 
 denote the sum of the expressions (183), (184) and (185) by 
 If, then by the Hamiltonian principle H is stationary when 
 the system is in equilibrium, so that if we suppose a small 
 variation to be caused by a quantity of gas S escaping from 
 the liquid then we must have for equilibrium 
 
 dH 
 
 this is equivalent to 
 
 RO log -?- - RO +f(0) -w-RO log ->- + .0 -/' (0) + a-' 
 
 o (186). 
 
 The last term when the amount of gas absorbed is 
 not large will be very nearly independent of the quantity 
 of gas dissolved. Equation (186) may be written 
 
DIFFUSION OF SALTS. l8l 
 
 RB log c^ = w-w' +f (0) -f(6) 
 
 where ^ is a constant and p arid p are the densities of the 
 free and dissolved gas respectively. Since the temperature 
 is constant, we see from this equation that p'/p is constant, 
 that is, the quantity of gas in unit volume of the liquid is 
 proportional to the density of the free gas. This is Henry's 
 law of the absorption of gases by liquids and it has been 
 verified by the researches of Bunsen and others. Bunsen's 
 experiments showed that the value of the ratio p'/p depends 
 upon the temperature, hence we see from equation (187) 
 
 that w-0-w'-'0 + r& + n0-r7ii cannot 
 
 be zero, otherwise p'/p would be the same at all tempera- 
 tures. Thus either the properties of the free gas can not 
 be quite the same as those of the dissolved gas, or else 
 the properties of the water are altered by the gas dissolved 
 in it. 
 
 95. A similar investigation will apply to the case of 
 a solid or gas which can dissolve in two fluids which do 
 not mix. We can prove in this way that when there is 
 equilibrium when the fluids are shaken up together then, 
 provided the solutions are dilute, the amount dissolved in 
 unit volume of one fluid will bear a constant ratio to that 
 dissolved in the same volume of the other (see Ostwald's 
 Lehrbueh der allgemeinen Chemie, I. p. 401). 
 
 96. The diffusion of salts through the solvent, a process 
 which goes on until the solution acquires a definite state, 
 can be explained by the same principles. In the following 
 investigation of this problem we include the consideration 
 of the effect of gravity upon diffusion. Let us suppose that 
 
182 DYNAMICS. 
 
 we have a shallow vessel whose volume is v and that this is 
 connected by a capillary tube of fine bore with another 
 shallow vessel whose volume is v' situated at a height h 
 above the lower vessel. Let the two vessels be filled with 
 water containing a certain quantity of salt dissolved in it, 
 then we wish to find how the salt is divided between the 
 vessels when equilibrium is established. Let and f\ be 
 the quantities of salt in the lower and upper vessels 
 respectively, then if h' be the height of the lower vessel 
 above some fixed plane, the potential energy of the salt in 
 the lower vessel may be taken to be g/i', so that there is 
 the term - gh f in the expression for the mean Lagrangian 
 function of this salt, similarly there is the term rjg(/i + h') 
 in the expression for the mean Lagrangian function of the 
 salt dissolved in the upper vessel. 
 
 Thus using the same notation as before the expression 
 for the mean Lagrangian function of the salt dissolved in 
 the lower vessel is 
 
 (188), 
 
 the mean Lagrangian function of the salt dissolved in the 
 upper vessel is 
 
 + if (6) - ifw - ng (h' + h) . . . ( 1 89). 
 
 " 
 
 Let us' suppose that a quantity 8rj of salt goes from the 
 lower to the upper vessel, then if there is equilibrium 
 this change must not alter the value of H^ the mean 
 Lagrangian function of the salt and solvent in the two 
 vessels. If the solutions are dilute the only part of H 
 which varies is the sum of the expressions (188) and (189), 
 
 and the condition 
 
 dH 
 
COMPRESSIBILITY OF SALT SOLUTIONS. 183 
 leads to the equation 
 
 or if ', rj f are the masses of salt in unit volume in the 
 lower and upper vessels respectively 
 
 -,-#4 = 0, 
 
 ' _** 
 or | = * ..................... (190). 
 
 So that the concentration of the solution when there is 
 equilibrium varies in the same way with the height as the 
 density of a gas under the action of gravity. 
 
 97. A large number of experiments have been made 
 on the effect of dissolved salts on the coefficients of com- 
 pressibility of various solutions (see Schumann " Compressi- 
 bilitat von Chlorid Losungen," Wied. Ann. xxxi. p. 14, 
 1887 and Rontgen and Schneider, Wied. Ann. xxix. p. 
 165, 1886), we shall therefore investigate an expression 
 for this effect and see what information can be gained 
 by comparing it with the results of the above-mentioned 
 experiments. 
 
 Let us suppose that the solution whose original volume 
 is v is subjected to a hydrostatic pressure p which reduces 
 its volume to v, and that k' is its coefficient of compressi- 
 bility. Then the mean Lagrangian function of the solution 
 and the system producing the pressure is 
 
 the mean Lagrangian function of the dissolved salt is, using 
 the same notation as hitherto, 
 
184 DYNAMICS. 
 
 where is the mass of the salt. 
 
 If H is the sum of these expressions then by the 
 Hamiltonian principle H must be stationary when there is 
 equilibrium. Let us suppose that the volume is increased 
 by dv, then since H is stationary we must have 
 
 dH 
 
 
 now %RQ\v is the pressure due to the molecules of the salt, 
 let us call this P. If p be increased by 8/, the correspond- 
 ing diminution in volume v is by (191) given by the equation 
 
 i Sv - 
 
 
 or since v is very nearly equal to v we may write this 
 equation in the form 
 
 So that the apparent coefficient of compressibility is 
 
 K 
 
 i^Pk'' 
 
 thus the pressure due to the molecules of the dissolved salt 
 produces a decrease in the coefficient of compressibility. 
 Let us see what the magnitude of this effect would be if 
 the pressure of the molecules were the only way in which 
 the dissolved salt affected the resistance to compression. 
 If we make this assumption k' 1/2*2 x io 10 , this being the 
 
COMPRESSIBILITY OF SALT SOLUTIONS. 185 
 
 value when measured in c. G. s. units of this constant for 
 pure water at i5C. If there is one equivalent of salt in a 
 litre of water, P is 22 atmospheres or in absolute measure 
 2-2 x io 7 . Since the reduction in the coefficient of com- 
 pressibility is very nearly equal to 
 
 or to one part in i /-/%', we see that when the strength of 
 solution is one equivalent per litre the reduction in the 
 coefficient of compressibility ought to amount to one part in 
 
 2'2 X IO 7 
 
 that is to one part in 1000. 
 
 The following table taken from Rontgen's and Schneider's 
 paper will show that the effect of dissolved salts is some- 
 times more than a hundredfold that calculated on the 
 above assumptions, and hence we conclude that in addition 
 to producing a pressure in the solvent the dissolved salt 
 must directly alter its elastic properties. 
 
 
 
 Reduction in com- 
 
 Names of salt 
 
 Strength of 
 solution in 
 
 pressibility found 
 by Rontgen and 
 
 or acid. 
 
 equivalents per 
 
 Schneider reckoned 
 
 
 litre. 
 
 in parts 
 
 
 
 per thousand. 
 
 HNO 3 
 
 49 
 
 42 
 
 HBr 
 
 49 
 
 40 
 
 HC1 
 
 52 
 
 52 
 
 H 2 S0 4 
 
 48 
 
 79 
 
 NH 3 I 
 
 49 
 
 90 
 
 NH 3 NO 3 
 
 5 
 
 94 
 
 NH 3 Br 
 
 5 
 
 90 
 
 NH 8 C1 
 
 Na 2 C0 3 
 
 t 
 
 '97 
 
1 86 DYNAMICS. 
 
 98. The pressure due to the molecules of the dissolved 
 salt will explain many of the phenomena exhibited by 
 solutions. The molecules of the salt may be regarded 
 as confined within a limited volume by the solvent, and 
 they will take any opportunity of expanding even though 
 they may have to do work to enable them to do so. Thus 
 if the solution was contained in a vessel provided with a 
 bottom pervious to water but impervious to the substance 
 dissolved in it, then if the vessel is placed in water with its 
 top above the surface water will flow up into the vessel 
 through the bottom, the work required to lift the water 
 being supplied by the expansion of the molecules of the 
 dissolved salt. This constitutes the well-known phenomenon 
 of osmosis. 
 
 A diaphragm which is said to be impervious to all salts 
 though it allows water to pass through it can be made by 
 allowing weak solutions of sulphate of copper and ferrocyanide 
 of potassium to diffuse into a porous plate from opposite 
 sides, these solutions when they meet form a membrane 
 of the kind desired. . Detailed instructions for making these 
 membranes are given in Pfeffer's Osmotische Untersuchungen, 
 Leipzig, 1877. By following his directions I have succeeded 
 in making such membranes though the number of failures 
 was very large compared with the number of successes. 
 Mr Adie, who is making some investigations on this subject 
 at the Cavendish Laboratory, finds that the membranes are 
 formed more readily if ferric chloride is used instead of 
 copper sulphate. 
 
 We shall now attempt to find by means of Hamilton's 
 principle the height to which the fluid will rise in the 
 osmometer. Let us suppose that the osmometer is a long 
 tube with a diaphragm of the kind we have been describing 
 at the bottom, and that it contains water and salt. Let 
 
OSMOSIS. IS/ 
 
 be the mass of the salt, rj that of the water inside the tube, 
 that of the water outside, and let v be the volume of 
 the tube occupied by the solution. Then, using the same 
 notation as hitherto, the mean Lagrangian function for the 
 salt is 
 
 *# log ^ + /(*) -*(, + *) (192), 
 
 where z is the height of the centre of gravity of the salt 
 molecules above some fixed plane. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the liquid in the tube 
 is 
 
 rjy'O + -nfl (0) - rj (wj +&) (193), 
 
 and for the liquid outside the tube 
 
 y<9 + t/;W-K + ^) (194), 
 
 where y is the height of the centre of gravity of the water 
 outside the osmometer : the quantities for the liquid inside 
 the tube are denoted by affixing dashes to the symbols 
 denoting the corresponding quantities for the water outside 
 the tube. 
 
 By the Hamiltonian principle the value of H, the sum 
 of (192), (193) and (194), is stationary when there is equili- 
 brium. Let us suppose that a quantity of water Srj flows 
 into the osmometer. 
 
 Then since if there is no contraction 
 
 dv dz i 
 
 di\ d-rj 20. ' 
 
 where a is the area of the cross section of the osmometer, 
 and 
 
1 88 DYNAMICS. 
 
 where h is the height of the top of the fluid in the osmometer 
 above the level of that outside : the condition 
 
 dH 
 
 ^ = 
 leads to the equation 
 
 if the properties of the solution are not altered by the pre- 
 sence of the salt then 
 
 and equation (195) becomes 
 
 where/ is the pressure due to the molecules of the dissolved 
 salt, and h' the height of a column of water whose mass is 
 the same as that of the salt dissolved in the osmometer. If 
 the strength of the solution in the osmometer is one equiva- 
 lent per litre, / is about 22 atmospheres, so that in this case 
 h + \ti is about 660 feet ; that is the water would flow into 
 the osmometer until the height of the liquid in the tube is 
 nearly an eighth of a mile above the level of the water 
 outside. 
 
 If the liquid is not allowed to expand but confined 
 in a constant volume we can easily prove in a similar way 
 that if the properties of the solvent are not changed by the 
 addition of the salt then when there is equilibrium the 
 pressure exerted by the fluid in the osmometer must be 
 the same as that due to the molecules of the salt. This 
 result is given by Van t' Hoff {L'equilibre chimique, Archiv 
 Neerlandais t. 20, p. 239). 
 
 Pfeffer (Osmotische Untersuchungen, p. 12) gives as the 
 
OSMOSIS. 189 
 
 pressure for a i % solution of potassium sulphate that due to 
 192-6 centimetres of mercury and for a i / solution of 
 potassium nitrate that due to 178-4 centimetres. The 
 pressure calculated on the above principles for potassium 
 sulphate is 97 centimetres if we assume that the molecule 
 is K 2 SO 4 and 194 if the molecule is J (K 2 SO 4 ), for potassium 
 nitrate it is 167 if the molecule is KNO 3 . 
 
 We see as in 90 that the terms in (195) depending 
 upon the alteration of the properties of the solvent by the 
 addition of the salt do not contain any powers of the strength 
 of the solution below the second. 
 
 A measurement of the osmotic pressure produced by any 
 salt solution will on the above assumptions give the same 
 information about the structure of the molecule of the salt 
 in the solution as a vapour density determination does about 
 the structure of the gas whose vapour density is determined, 
 for it enables us to find the number of molecules in a given 
 mass of the gas. Thus Pfeffer's measurement of the os- 
 motic pressure due to potassium sulphate suggests that the 
 relation between the composition of the molecule of this 
 salt and that of potassium nitrate is represented by ^K 2 SO 4 
 and KNO 8 , and not by K 2 SO 4 and KNO 3 . 
 
 Even if we do not assume that the molecules of a salt 
 produce a pressure analogous to that of a gas, it would still 
 follow from the Hamiltonian principle that there would be 
 a rise in the osmometer if the increase in the mean Lagran- 
 gian function of the liquid inside the osmometer caused by 
 the addition of unit mass of water is greater than the 
 diminution in the mean Lagrangian function in the water 
 outside the osmometer caused by the abstraction of unit 
 mass of water. 
 
 Anything that causes a change of this kind will increase 
 the height to which the fluid will rise in the osmometer ; 
 
1 90 DYNAMICS. 
 
 thus, if the addition of water to the solution inside the os- 
 mometer is attended by an evolution of heat, the solution 
 will rise higher in the osmometer than one of similar strength 
 in which no heat was evolved in dilution. On this account 
 the indications of the osmometer are somewhat ambiguous, 
 and before coming to any definite conclusion as to the 
 structure of the molecule of the salt it would be necessary 
 to use several solvents and to show that the osmotic height 
 varied as the absolute temperature. 
 
 99. Surface Tension of Solutions. The experi- 
 ments of Rontgen and Schneider already alluded to have 
 proved that for most solutions the product of the height to 
 which the solution rises in a capillary tube into the density 
 of the solution is greater for a solution of a salt than for pure 
 water, and that for dilute solutions of most (though not all) 
 substances this product increases with the strength of the 
 solution. It follows from this that the tension of the surface 
 of contact of the solution with air increases with the strength 
 of the solution, while the tension of the surface of contact 
 of the solution with glass or any other solid body diminishes 
 as the solution gets stronger. 
 
 The variation of the surface tension with the strength of 
 solution may cause the strength of the solution to vary near 
 the surface. 
 
 To investigate the magnitude of this effect let us suppose 
 that we have a thin film whose area is S and surface tension 
 T, connected with the bulk of the liquid by a capillary 
 thread. Let be the mass of salt in the thin film, f] that in 
 the rest of the liquid ; then if is the mass of water in the 
 film, that of the rest of the water, the mean Lagrangian 
 function of the liquid and salt in the film is, using the 
 same notation as before, 
 
SURFACE TENSION, 
 
 RO log - + tf(0) - fa + 7 + /; (0) - 
 
 where v is the volume of the film. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the rest of the liquid 
 is 
 
 t]RB log VP + ij/(0) - 77?^ + eyO + e/;(0) - ?/,. 
 
 Let us suppose that a mass of salt S goes into the film, 
 the change in the mean Lagrangian function is 
 
 and this by the Hamiltonian principle must vanish; thus if 
 p, p are the masses of salt in unit volume of the film and 
 liquid respectively, we get 
 
 P 
 
 or if T is the increase in the surface tension when the mass 
 of salt in unit volume is increased by unity 
 
 , zT' 
 
 p r e > 
 
 where t is the thickness of the film. Thus if the surface 
 tension is increased by the addition of the salt there will be 
 less salt per unit volume in the film than in the liquid in 
 bulk, while if the surface tension is diminished by the addi- 
 tion of salt there will be more salt in unit volume of the film 
 than in unit volume of the rest of the liquid. We saw that 
 the surface tension of a solution in contact with a solid di- 
 minished as the strength of the solution increased, thus if we 
 had a film in contact with a solid there would be more salt 
 in unit volume of the film than in unit volume of the bulk of 
 
I Q2 DYNAMICS. 
 
 the liquid ; if we dipped for example a piece of filter paper 
 in such a solution, the solution in the filter paper would be 
 stronger than the rest. Or, again, if such a solution were to 
 flow through a capillary tube the salt would have a tendency 
 to flow to the sides, so that the more quickly moving fluid 
 at the centre would get weaker and weaker. Many experi- 
 mental illustrations of this could be given ; one of these is 
 an experiment tried by Dr Monckman and myself at the 
 Cavendish Laboratory, in which a deep coloured solution of 
 potassium permanganate emerged almost colourless after 
 trickling through finely divided silica. Again, if a piece of 
 filter paper be dipped into a coloured solution of a salt such 
 as potassium permanganate, unless the salt has a very strong 
 affinity for the water the solution after rising some height 
 in the filter paper becomes colourless. 
 
 If a small quantity of paraffin oil be mixed with water 
 the surface tension of the solution against a solid is greater 
 than that of water, and such a solution will increase in 
 strength when it flows through finely divided silica. 
 
CHAPTER XIII. 
 
 DISSOCIATION. 
 
 100. THE Hamiltonian method can t>e used for the pur- 
 pose of obtaining the laws which govern the phenomena of 
 dissociation, i.e. the splitting up of a molecule into its atoms, 
 such as the iodine molecule I 2 into the atoms I and I ; or 
 of a complex molecule into simpler ones, as in the case of 
 nitrogen tetroxide, where the molecule N 2 O 4 splits up into 
 two molecules of NO 2 , or when the molecule of chloride of 
 ammonium splits up into ammonia and hydrochloric acid. 
 
 This phenomenon has some analogy with that of 
 evaporation ; as in the latter case we have equilibrium 
 between portions of matter in two different states, the 
 gaseous and the liquid, matter being able to pass from the 
 one state to the other by evaporation and condensation, so 
 in dissociation we have also equilibrium between portions of 
 the same substance in two different conditions, both in the 
 gaseous state, the molecules in the one condition being 
 more complex than those in the other, and matter being 
 able to pass from one condition into the other by the more 
 complex molecules splitting up, " dissociating" as it is called 
 into the simpler ones, while on the other hand some of the 
 simpler ones combine and form the more complex molecules. 
 Equilibrium is attained when the number of the complex 
 
 T. D. 13 
 
IQ4 DYNAMICS. 
 
 molecules which split up in any time is the same as the 
 number formed in the same time. 
 
 Let . us first investigate the case when the complex 
 molecules contain two of the simpler ones ; this is the case 
 when, as in iodine, the more complex systems are di-atomic 
 molecules and the simpler ones atoms, as well as in such 
 cases as the dissociation of N 2 O 4 . 
 
 Let us suppose that the system is contained in a closed 
 vessel and that is the mass of the complex molecules, 77 
 that of the simpler ones. We shall for the present assume 
 that both gases obey Boyle's law and that the fundamental 
 equation for the complex gas is 
 
 f = J? lP 0, 
 
 and for the simpler gas 
 
 / = *,P0, 
 
 where / is the pressure, p the density and the absolute 
 temperature. 
 
 Since the molecules of the complex gas consist of two of 
 those of the simpler gas, the density of the simpler gas will 
 at the same pressure and temperature be half that of the 
 complex gas and therefore 
 
 ^ 2 =2^. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function of the complex gas is 
 fl^log^a+S/iW-frr, (196), 
 
 where v is the volume of the vessel in which the gas is 
 contained and w l the potential energy of unit mass of the 
 complex gas. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the simpler gas is 
 
 ^ 2 01og^W 2 W-W 2 (197), 
 
 where w 2 is the potential energy of unit mass of this gas. 
 
DISSOCIATION. 195 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function H for the two gases, 
 assuming that the properties of each are not modified by 
 the presence of the other, is the sum of the expressions 
 (196) and (197). By the Hamiltonian principle the value 
 of H is stationary when the system is in equilibrium. Let 
 us suppose that the state of equilibrium is disturbed by 
 a mass S of the simpler molecules combining to form 
 complex ones. Then since the value of H is stationary 
 we must have 
 
 dH_ 
 
 Since the mass of the gas is constant 
 
 and the condition 
 
 ~=o 
 is equivalent to 
 
 log - xf +/ (0) -w,- R 2 e log p 
 
 or since 
 we have 
 
 vp 
 
 2 = o ...... (198), 
 
 $ log 
 
 This can be written 
 
 2 Wj-TOg 
 
 ^=*(). *. .................. (199), 
 
 where <jf> (0) is a function of 6 but not of , rj or v. 
 
 In experiments on dissociation the quantity usually 
 measured is the vapour density of the mixture at some 
 standard pressure TT. 
 
 132 
 
196 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Let A be the density of the mixture of the two gases at 
 this pressure, D that of the complex or undissociated gas at 
 the same Dressure. 
 
 the same pressure. 
 
 The pressure in the vessel is 
 
 or since R z - 2^, 
 
 the pressure equals Rfl. 
 
 The density of the gas at this pressure is 
 
 v ' 
 
 so that A the density at the pressure TT is given by the 
 equation 
 
 A= ll _^_ . 
 
 the density D of the complex gas at this pressure is given 
 by the equation 
 
 so that 
 
 u r 
 
 and therefore 
 
 +2rj~ D 
 
 and fi^T 4H 
 
 since PV ( + 2rf) Rfl, 
 
 pv Z>-A 
 we have *) -^-^ j^~ 
 
 pv 2^-D 
 
DISSOCIATION. 197 
 
 so that equation (199) becomes 
 
 where 
 
 10 1. Before discussing this equation we shall investigate 
 the way in which it must be modified if the gas does not 
 obey Boyle's law. 
 
 Formulae connecting the pressure and volume in such 
 gases have been given by Van der Waals (Die Continuitat 
 des gasformigen una flilssigen Zustandes] and Clausius (Wied. 
 Ann. ix. p. 337). 
 
 Van der Waals' formula, which is rather the simpler of 
 the two, is 
 
 RQ a 
 
 where R is the value of pfpO for a perfect gas of the same 
 specific gravity, and b and a constants depending upon the 
 nature of the gas. 
 
 Clausius' formula is 
 
 RB__ *_ 
 
 P ~V-a 6(v + p)*' 
 
 where R is the same as in Van der Waals' formula for the 
 same gas, and a, /?, K are small constants depending upon 
 the nature of the gas. We shall now investigate the differ- 
 ence produced in the state of equilibrium of a dissociable 
 gas if it and the components into which it is decomposed 
 obey Van der Waals' law instead of Boyle's. 
 
198 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Let the fundamental equations of the complex and 
 simple gases be respectively 
 
 and 
 
 where 
 
 as before. 
 
 Then we can easily prove that instead of the term 
 
 P 
 
 in the mean Lagrangian function, we have the term 
 
 where p is the density of the complex gas; with a corre- 
 sponding term in the expression for the Lagrangian function 
 of the simpler gas. 
 
 The condition 
 
 dH 
 
 =0 
 
 will now lead to the equation 
 
 log (I - b lP ) + log P - - 
 
 P I - 
 
 - R 2 | log ( i - b 2 p') + log ^ - ^-^1 -f 
 
 +f l (0)~f 2 (6)-(w l -w a ) = o .......... (201) 
 
 and not to the equation (198). 
 
DISSOCIATION. 199 
 
 Equation (201) may be written, since J? a =2jRj, 
 
 = / - w 
 
 Now if we suppose that the deviations from Boyle's Law 
 are slight, so that b l and b z are so small that their squares 
 may be neglected, we may write this equation as 
 
 =<M0) VR e Rio ....... (202); 
 
 since ^vR-fl is approximately equal to p 2 // and a l and p 
 are both small fractions while /= io 6 if the pressure is one 
 atmosphere, equation (202) may be written as 
 
 *' 
 
 an equation of the same form as when the gases obeyed 
 Boyle's law. The connexion between the masses of the 
 complex and simple gases and the vapour density of the 
 mixture will not however be the same as when the gases 
 obeyed Boyle's law, and so the relation between the vapour 
 density, the pressure and the temperature may be different 
 although equation (202) shows that the relation between the 
 masses of the dissociated and undissociated gases is the 
 same. 
 
 It would be an interesting problem to find an expression 
 for the vapour density of the mixture in terms of the masses 
 of the two gases in this case, we shall not however stop to 
 
200 DYNAMICS. 
 
 investigate it as it would not be of any use for the purpose 
 of connecting theory with experiment, for in determining 
 the vapour density from the experiments Boyle's law was no 
 doubt assumed. 
 
 102. Formulae corresponding to equation (200) deduced 
 from thermodynamical considerations have been given by 
 Willard Gibbs (Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances, p. 
 239) and Boltzmann (Wied. Ann. xxn. p. 39, 1884). 
 
 Thus according to Gibbs 
 
 this agrees with (200) if fa (6) is constant. 
 According to Boltzmann 
 
 and this agrees with (200) if fa (6) is proportional to 0. 
 
 Gibbs in his paper (" On the vapour densities of per- 
 oxide of nitrogen, formic acid, acetic acid and perchloride of 
 phosphorus," American Journal of Science and Art, xvm. p. 
 277, 1879), discusses the results of experiments on the vapour 
 densities of these substances at different temperatures and 
 pressures and has found that they agree fairly well with the 
 results calculated by formula (203). Quite recently however 
 E. and L. Natanson have made a most elaborate investigation 
 of the vapour density of nitrogen tetroxide at various tempe- 
 ratures and pressures (Wied. Ann. xxvu. p. 306). They 
 found that so long as the temperature remains constant the 
 vapour density of nitrogen tetroxide at different pressures is 
 given with great accuracy by the formula (200) but that if the 
 
DISSOCIATION. 201 
 
 temperature changes the difference between the observed 
 results and those calculated from either Gibbs' or Boltz- 
 mann's formula, assuming that the quantity a which occurs 
 in it is constant, is greater than can be accounted for 
 by errors of experiment. Part of this difference may arise 
 because the N 2 O 4 does not obey Boyle's law. The differ- 
 ences seem however to be too great to be explained 
 altogether in this way, and a value of fa (0) different from 
 that adopted by either Gibbs or Bolt/mann would probably 
 fit in better with the observations. 
 
 103. In the Philosophical Magazine for October, 1884, 
 I considered the question of dissociation from the point of 
 view of the kinetic theory of gases, supposing that the 
 complex molecules are continually being broken up while 
 the simpler ones are continually combining, and that the gas 
 attains a steady state when the number of complex molecules 
 broken up in the unit time is the same as the number formed 
 in that time. It is shown that, using the same notation as 
 in 99, these conditions lead to the equation 
 
 if, and only if, the average time a complex molecule lasts 
 without splitting up into simpler ones, is independent of the 
 number of molecules of the gas in unit volume. This will 
 evidently not be the case if the breaking up of the complex 
 molecules is due to their collision with other molecules, for in 
 this case the greater the number of molecules the greater the 
 number of collisions, and therefore the shorter the time the 
 complex molecule lasts. Since the results of a large number 
 of experiments prove that equation (200) holds when the 
 temperature is constant we conclude that the dissociation of 
 
202 DYNAMICS. 
 
 the complex molecules is not due to the collision with other 
 molecules. We have however deduced (200) from mechani- 
 cal principles which hold whenever the two gases obey Avo- 
 gadro's law and whenever the pressure produced by a mixture 
 of gases is the sum of the pressures which would be produced 
 by each of the gases separately if the other were removed. 
 Hence we conclude that when we have a gas some of whose 
 molecules are complex and keep breaking up into simpler 
 molecules which after a time recombine to form the complex 
 molecules, then if the splitting up of the complex mole- 
 cules is due to their striking against other molecules, the 
 pressure due to the gas will not be the sum of the pressures 
 which the dissociated and undissociated gases would produce 
 if each were by itself in the vessel. 
 
 104. We shall now consider how external influences 
 may modify the amount of dissociation which takes place in 
 some given gas at a given temperature and pressure. 
 
 If we denote rfjv by A. and use X as a measure of the 
 amount of dissociation, then if the Lagrangian function from 
 some external cause is increased by x we see by equation 
 (198) that SA the change in X is given by the equation 
 
 Thus if x increases as diminishes that is as dissoci- 
 ation goes on SA will be positive, that is dissociation will go 
 on further than it did in the undisturbed state. This is 
 another illustration of the general principle stated in 84 
 that any slight alteration in the conditions under which a 
 system is placed which increases the rate of increase of the 
 mean Lagrangian function with any change in the system, 
 will cause that change to go on further before equilibrium is 
 
DISSOCIATION. 203 
 
 attained than it had to do in the undisturbed system and 
 vice versa. 
 
 We shall now consider the effects on dissociation of such 
 things as surface tension, electrification, the presence of 
 other gases, corresponding to those we considered in the 
 analogous case of evaporation. 
 
 105. Effect of surface tension upon dissocia- 
 tion. Though the effects, of surface tension are not nearly 
 so prominent in gases^as in liquids, still, since there is perfect 
 continuity from the liquid to the gaseous state, we should 
 expect that the outer layer of molecules of a gas which was 
 not in the "perfect" condition would like the outer layer in a 
 liquid be under different conditions from the other molecules, 
 and would therefore not possess the same amount of energy 
 as the same number of molecules in the midst of the gas. 
 
 In Van der Waals' theory of the relation between the 
 pressure and volume in an imperfect gas, the result of which 
 is expressed by the relation 
 
 the term ajv 2 is due to the action of the surface tension of 
 the gas (Van der Waals, Die Continiiitat ties gasformigen 
 undfliissigen Zustands, p. 34). 
 
 Though it is much more difficult to detect the existence 
 of the action of surface tension experimentally in gases than 
 in liquids there is still some evidence of its existence from 
 experiments such as those of Bosscha on the forms of 
 clouds of fog and tobacco smoke. 
 
 There must therefore be a term in the expression for the 
 potential energy of a gas proportional to its surface. We 
 shall write this term 
 
 TS, 
 
204 DYNAMICS. 
 
 where T is the quantity corresponding to the surface tension 
 and S is the area of the surface of the gas. Thus the change 
 X in the Lagrangian function, 104, is 
 
 -TS, 
 so that by (205) 
 
 o ............ (206). 
 
 Thus, if the surface tension diminishes as dissociation 
 goes on, in which case dTld is positive, the dissociation will 
 be greater the larger the surface of the gas. We should 
 expect a priori that the surface tension of the dissociated 
 gas would be smaller than that of the undissociated, for in 
 most cases the dissociated gas approaches more nearly than 
 the other to the state of a perfect gas : thus in most cases 
 dTld% will be positive, so that dissociation will be facilitated 
 by increasing the surface of the gas. 
 
 Let us now endeavour to form a rough estimate of the 
 magnitude of this effect. According to Van der Waals the 
 energy of unit area of surface of gas is measured by 
 
 xa 
 7' 
 
 where x is a distance comparable with molecular distances. 
 Now for a cubic centimetre of ether vapour at oC. and 
 under atmospheric pressure a!v 2 is a pressure of about 
 324 x io~ 4 atmospheres, or in absolute measure 3-24 x io 4 . 
 If we take the molecular distance x as io~ 7 , we have 
 
 rr, oca _ 7 
 
 T = -j-= TO 7 x 3-24 x io 4 
 
 = '24x io~ 3 . 
 
DISSOCIATION. 205 
 
 Now by equation (206) 
 
 SA - ' * (ST) 
 ~X~Rfidk^ 
 
 In order to form a rough estimate of the value of dT\d, 
 let us suppose that the complex gas possesses surface 
 tension but that the simpler one does not; this is an 
 approach to the truth, as the value of a and therefore of 
 the surface tension is very much greater for complex gases 
 than for simple ones. Let p be the density of the complex 
 gas, v the volume in which it is contained, then 
 
 = vp. 
 
 Since the surface tension varies as a/z? t it is proportional 
 to the square of the density, so that 
 
 i dT _ 2 dp 
 
 and thus 
 
 dT 2T 
 
 so that we have 
 
 8X 2 ST 
 
 (2 7) ' 
 
 Now at the atmospheric pressure, at which we reckoned 7J 
 
 jRflp = io 6 , 
 and substituting for T its value, we have 
 
 8\ 28 3 
 
 -T- = - 9 approximately. 
 
 A V I O 
 
206 DYNAMICS. 
 
 If the gas be supposed to be a film of thickness /, then 
 8A. _ 1.2 
 
 T ~ /X TO 8 ' 
 
 so that if the thickness of the film were comparable with 
 molecular dimension, say if /=io~ 7 , then the surface 
 tension would produce very large effects. 
 
 This example may be sufficient to show that if we have 
 the gas in thin films surface tension may produce a very con- 
 siderable effect ; such films occur adhering to glass fibres or 
 to matter in a fine state of division, such as spongy platinum 
 or charcoal. The value of T given above is only part of the 
 surface tension of the surface of contact of the gas and the 
 solid. The surface tension of the surfaces separating A and 
 B is due to the energy of thin layers of A and B next 
 their junction differing by a finite amount from the energy 
 possessed by equally thin layers in their interior. The ab- 
 normal energy of these layers is due to the want of symmetry 
 of the action on the two sides. In the preceding investigation 
 we have calculated the part of the energy of the layer of one 
 of these substances arising from the effects produced by its 
 own molecules, in addition to this there is the energy arising 
 from the action of the glass on the gas as well as the energy 
 in the thin film of glass. Thus the value of the surface 
 tension may be much greater than that given above and the 
 effects due to it may therefore be greater than our estimate. 
 
 1 06. The value of T may depend upon the substance 
 to which the film adheres, and thus the nature of the walls 
 of vessels used for chemical experiments may affect the 
 chemical combination which goes on inside them. Van 't 
 HofT has described some experiments which seem to show 
 that effects of this kind do exist. He shows (Etudes de 
 Dynamique Chimique, p. 56) that the rate at which the 
 
DISSOCIATION. 207 
 
 polymerization of cyanic acid goes on is increased by 
 increasing the area of the walls of the vessel in which it is 
 contained, the volume being kept constant. Thus when 
 the area of the walls was increased six times, the rate of 
 polymerization was increased in the ratio of 4 to 3. He 
 also found that when the walls of the vessel were covered 
 with a deposit of cyamelide the rate of polymerization of 
 cyanic acid was increased threefold. Victor Meyer too 
 found that the decomposition of carbonic acid takes place in 
 a porcelain vessel at a temperature several hundred degrees 
 lower than in a platinum vessel. When the effects produced 
 are of this magnitude, it is doubtful whether they can be 
 due to the effect of surface tension, but it is probable that 
 in the case of many catalytic actions, where we have thin 
 films of gas, the effects observed might be explained by 
 considerations of this kind. 
 
 107. Effect of Electricity upon Dissociation. 
 
 When there is no electric discharge electrification will not 
 produce any effect upon the final state of the system, unless 
 the specific inductive capacity of the gas changes as disso- 
 ciation goes on. As all the specific inductive capacities 
 of gases which have been determined are very nearly equal, 
 the effect of electrification on dissociation must be very 
 small, and we shall not stop to determine it. 
 
 1 08. Effect of a neutral gas. If the properties of the 
 neutral gas are not affected in any way by the presence of the 
 gas which is dissociating, the value of the mean Lagrangian 
 function of the neutral gas will not change as dissociation 
 goes on. The presence of this gas will therefore not affect 
 the maximum amount of dissociation. The presence of a 
 foreign gas certainly alters the rate of dissociation, and 
 
208 DYNAMICS. 
 
 in some cases the experiments seem to show that it does 
 alter the maximum amount of dissociation. This is contrary 
 to the result we have just arrived at, and the only way of 
 reconciling the two is to suppose that the gas is not per- 
 fectly neutra! but has its properties affected to some extent 
 by the presence of the other gases. If the dissociation 
 were at all catalytic, we might explain the action of the 
 neutral gas by supposing that by itself forming a film on 
 the surface of the vessel it prevented to some extent the 
 dissociating gas from doing so. 
 
 109. In the preceding investigations we have assumed 
 that the complex molecule splits up into two molecules or 
 atoms of the same kind. In some cases however the 
 constituents into which the molecule splits up are different, 
 as for example when PC1 5 splits up into PC1 3 and C1 2 . 
 
 We can easily modify the preceding investigation to 
 suit cases of this kind. 
 
 Let us take the dissociation of phosphorus pentachloride 
 as a typical case, and let , rj, be the masses of PC1 5 , PC1 3 , 
 and C1 2 respectively. 
 
 Then the mean Lagrangian functions for these gases are 
 respectively 
 
 Now ifVj, c# ^ 3 are the molecular weights of these gases 
 respectively, then since the increase in the number of mole- 
 
DISSOCIATION. 209 
 
 cules of PC1 3 is the same as that in the number of C1 2 and 
 to the decrease in the number of PC1 5 , we have 
 
 where </, dv\> dt, are the alterations in the masses of PC1 8 , 
 PC1 3 , and C1 2 respectively ; hence, remembering that 
 
 we see that the condition 
 
 dH 
 
 leads to the equation 
 
 it 
 
 (208), 
 
 and thus ifQ^v is constant as long as the temperature is 
 constant. 
 
 Let us suppose that the values of , -rj, before dissoci- 
 ation commenced were , iy , and that the mass c^p of 
 PC1 5 gets decomposed, then we have 
 
 and the equation to find / is 
 
 (% + ^ 2 ^) (^o + 'a/) ^ ^ tfo - 'i/) ...... ( 2 9), 
 
 where ^ is a function of the temperature. 
 
 We shall now discuss the effect upon / of alterations in 
 the values of v, r] and . 
 
 Differentiating (209) we get, writing y for 
 
 T. D. 14 
 
210 DYNAMICS. 
 
 dp I 
 
 ........................ (210), 
 
 1 dv v 
 
 dp_ _ i , 
 
 = * 
 
 We see from (210) that dpjdv is positive, so that dissociation 
 will be promoted by increasing the volume in which a given 
 quantity of gas is confined. From equations (211) and (212) 
 we see that both dpjd-q^ and dpjd^ are negative, so that the 
 presence of free PC1 3 and C1 2 tends to stop the dissociation. 
 Wiirtz proved experimentally that there was very little 
 dissociation of PC1 5 when it was placed in an atmosphere of 
 PC1 3 . We can also see from general principles that this must 
 be so, for as soon as the molecule PC1 5 breaks up the free 
 chlorine will be surrounded by such a multitude of mole- 
 cules of PC1 3 that most of it will recombine and form PC1 5 , 
 and in this way stop the dissociation. 
 
 In this case, as in the former, theory indicates that if 
 there is no catalytic action the presence of a neutral gas 
 would not produce any effect. 
 
 In some cases, though the results of the dissociation 
 are in the gaseous state, the body which dissociates is in 
 the solid or liquid state instead of, as in the previous 
 instances, the gaseous. The dissociation of NH 5 S into 
 H 2 S and NH 3 is an example of this kind. 
 
 We have only to slightly modify the preceding work to 
 make it applicable to this case. Let as before be the mass 
 of the dissociating body, rj and those of the components 
 into which it is dissociated. Then the mean Lagrangian 
 function for the solid or liquid dissociating body is by (81) 
 
DISSOCIATION. 211 
 
 The mean Lagrangian functions of the gases into which 
 it dissociates are respectively 
 
 +. -*., 
 
 and 
 
 Then from the condition 
 dH 
 
 <*r> 
 
 we get, since d% = - (drj + d), 
 
 dv i 
 # = ~a' 
 
 and *-*, 
 
 ', ',' 
 
 where ^ 2 and <r 3 are the combining weights of the gases into 
 which the solid dissociates, and <r the density of the solid 
 or liquid 
 
 It follows from this equation that, as before, dissociation 
 is hindered by the presence in excess of either of the results 
 of the dissociation. 
 
 In this case the dissociation would be affected to a small 
 extent by the presence of a neutral gas, for if the system is 
 confined in a closed vessel the volume of the solid or liquid 
 diminishes as it evaporates, the neutral gas above it expands, 
 and its Lagrangian function therefore increases. Hence 
 we see by (84) that the presence of the neutral gas will 
 increase the dissociation. 
 
 142 
 
212 DYNAMICS. 
 
 By an investigation similar to that in (89) we can 
 easily show that if K denotes the value of r]/v 2 , and 8/< the 
 change produced by the presence of the neutral gas, then 
 
 where e is the mass of the neutral gas, c its combining 
 weight and o- the density of the solid or liquid. Since e/wr 
 is the ratio of the mass of the gas to the mass of the same 
 volume of the dissociable solid, we see that the effect 
 produced by the neutral gas, unless its pressure amounts 
 to some hundreds of atmospheres, is extremely small. If 
 we take the case of sal-ammoniac, where o- is about 1-5, 
 we see that for a pressure of 100 atmospheres 
 
 SK 
 - = '3 approximately, 
 
 so that if the pressure were increased by about 3*3 atmo- 
 spheres the change in K would be about one per cent. 
 
 no. Dissociation of Salts in Solution. We have 
 seen 92 that Van 't Hoif has given reasons for believing 
 that the molecules of a salt in a dilute solution exert the 
 same pressure as they would if they were in the gaseous 
 state at the same temperature and volume : and that the 
 mean Lagrangian function of the molecules in the solution 
 is therefore the same as that of the same number of gaseous 
 molecules. We might therefore expect from analogy that 
 in some cases these molecules would be dissociated though 
 the effects of this dissociation might not be so recognisable 
 as in the case of gases. Many cases of the dissociation 
 of salts in solution have been observed, sodium sulphate 
 and the ammonium salts are well-known examples (Muir's 
 Principles of Chemistry, p. 367). Indeed the theory has 
 
DISSOCIATION. 213 
 
 recently been started that in dilute aqueous solutions the 
 dissolved acid or salt is in most cases dissociated and that 
 to a very considerable extent ; thus it has been stated that in 
 dilute solutions of HC1 as much as 90 per cent, of the acid 
 is dissociated. The reasons given for this conclusion do not 
 seem to me to be very convincing, and the experimental 
 results on which they are based seem to admit of a differ- 
 ent interpretation. The supporters of this theory urge 
 that for the salt to produce the effect which in some cases 
 it does, it is necessary to suppose that the molecules of the 
 salt exert a greater pressure than they would if they 
 occupied the same volume at the same temperature when in 
 the gaseous condition. This reasoning is founded on the 
 assumption that all the effects due to the dissolved salt may 
 be completely explained merely by supposing the volume 
 occupied by the solvent to be filled with the molecules of 
 the salt in the gaseous condition. Now though we may 
 admit that the salt does produce the effects that would be 
 produced by this hypothetical distribution of gaseous mole- 
 cules, still it does not follow that these are the only effects 
 produced by the salt. The salt may change the properties 
 of the solvent and the effects attributed to the dissociation 
 of the molecules may in reality be due to this change. The 
 investigation in 97 proves that this must be so in some cases, 
 for we saw that the effects of the addition of salt on the 
 compressibility of the solution were much too large to be 
 explained by any amount of dissociation. 
 
 In the case of the dissociation of salt solutions the proper- 
 ties of the solution might alter as the dissociation progressed. 
 Thus the dissociation might alter the surface tension of the 
 solution, in which case the amount of dissociation would 
 depend upon the shape and volume of the solution ; or it 
 might alter the coefficient of compressibility or the volume 
 
214 DYNAMICS. 
 
 of the solution, and then the amount of dissociation would 
 be influenced by external pressure. In fact the dissociation 
 of the dissolved salt would probably be much more sus- 
 ceptible to external physical influences than the dissociation 
 of a gas. We shall however discuss these as particular 
 cases of the next investigation, which deals with a much 
 more general case of chemical equilibrium between either 
 gases or dilute solutions. 
 
CHAPTER XIV. 
 
 GENERAL CASE OF CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM. 
 
 in. THE case we shall consider in this chapter is the 
 equilibrium of four substances A, B, C, D, either gases or 
 in dilute solutions, such that A by its action on B pro- 
 duces C and Z>, while C by its action on D produces A 
 
 A well-known example of this kind of action is the case 
 in which the four substances A, B, C, D are respectively 
 nitric acid, sodium sulphate, sulphuric acid and sodium 
 nitrate : the nitric acid acts on the sodium sulphate and 
 forms sodium nitrate and sulphuric acid, while the sulphuric 
 acid acts on the sodium nitrate and forms sodium sulphate 
 and nitric acid. 
 
 The problem we have to discuss is to find, when any 
 quantities of four such substances are mixed together, the 
 quantity of each when there is equilibrium. 
 
 Let , -T), , be the masses of the substances A, B, C, 
 D respectively, w lt w 2 , w 3 , w 4 the mean potential energy of 
 unit mass of each of these substances, w the mean potential 
 energy of the mixture. Let us suppose that each of these 
 substances obeys Boyle's law; and p denoting the density 
 
2l6 DYNAMICS. 
 
 . 
 
 of any one at the temperature 6 and pressure /, let the 
 fundamental equation of A be 
 
 that of B p = 
 
 that of C p = 
 
 and that of D p = R^B. 
 
 Then the mean Lagrangian functions of A, B, C and D 
 are respectively 
 
 where z; is the volume in which the substances are confined, 
 The above expressions represent the mean Lagrangian 
 functions equally well whether the substances A, B, C, D 
 are gases or dilute solutions, provided the solutions are so 
 dilute that the molecules of the substances dissolved in 
 them exercise the same pressure as they would if placed at 
 the same temperature in the same volume when empty. 
 
 If we are considering solutions we shall require the 
 mean Lagrangian function of the solvent, for the properties 
 of this may alter as chemical combination goes on. If TT is 
 the mass of the solvent, w 5 the potential energy of unit mass, 
 then its mean Lagrangian function will be of the form 
 Try 6 + 7r/ 5 (0) TTW & . 
 
 We must now investigate the relations between the 
 changes in , 17, , c as chemical action goes on. 
 
CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM. 217 
 
 Let us denote by (A) the molecule of the substance A, 
 with a similar notation for the other molecules, and let the 
 chemical action which goes on between the four substances 
 be represented by 
 
 a(A) + b(B} = c(C) + d(D] ............ (213). 
 
 Thus, in the case of the mixture of sulphuric and nitric 
 acids, sodium nitrate and sodium sulphate, since the equation 
 which expresses the reaction is 
 
 2 HNO 3 + Na 2 SO 4 - H 2 SO 4 + 2 NaNO 3 , 
 
 if the molecules of nitric acid, sodium sulphate, sulphuric 
 acid and sodium nitrate in the solution are represented 
 respectively by HNO 3 , Na 2 SO 4 , H 2 SO 4 and NaNO 3 , then 
 a = 2, b = i, c= i, d 2. If however the molecules of these 
 substances are represented by H N 2 O 6 , Na 2 SO 4 , H 2 SO 4 , 
 Na 2 N 2 O 6 , then a = b = c = d=\. 
 
 Thus we see that it is necessary to know the structure of 
 the molecule as well as its relative composition. 
 
 From equation (214) we see that if a molecules of A 
 disappear it must be because they have combined with b of B 
 to produce c of C and d of Z>, so that b molecules of B have 
 also disappeared, while c of C and d of D have appeared. 
 
 Let 8 1} 8 2 , 8 3 , 8 4 represent the relative densities of A, B, C, D 
 at the same temperatures and pressures, then 
 
 If the masses of A, B, C, D are altered by d^ dv\, d^ de 
 respectively, then the alterations in the number of molecules 
 of A, B, C, D are respectively proportional to 
 
 dj_ drj d di 
 V V V V 
 
218 
 
 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Thus, since the alterations in the number of molecules 
 are proportional to a, b,-c,-d respectively, we have 
 
 So that 
 
 d* 
 
 Now when the system is in equilibrium the value of the 
 Hamiltonian function must be stationary, so that if we 
 suppose the equilibrium displaced by the quantity d of A 
 combining with the proper quantity of B the change in 
 the Hamiltonian function must be zero, hence we must 
 have 
 
 dH . ,. 
 
 - . =o (216). 
 
 Let us take first the case when A, J3, C, D are gases, 
 then since H is the sum of the mean Lagrangian function 
 for these substances the condition (216) with the help of 
 equations (215) gives the equation 
 
 R$ log - a\R$ + b^R 2 log - 
 
 - c^Rf log p 
 
 - d^R log V ^ 
 
 where w = w l + rpv a + w a + cw 4 . 
 
 Then by (214) we may write this equation in the form 
 
CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM. 2IQ 
 
 a dw 
 
 # # ......... ( 2I y) 
 
 when <(0) is a function of & but does not involve , ;, r - 
 
 112. In the case of dilute solutions the equation corre- 
 sponding to (217) is easily seen to be 
 
 Y c d a ^ w a e Q 
 
 J_l = ^) 7J c+d-a-6 JWl*t R# d ..... ( 2I g) 
 
 where Q is the mean Lagrangian function of the solvent and 
 equals 
 
 The value of dQjd will be zero if the properties of the 
 solvent do not change as chemical action goes on; in any case 
 since the solutions are very dilute the properties of the 
 solvent may be assumed to be changed by an amount pro- 
 portional to the quantity of salt dissolved, Q will therefore 
 be a linear function of , rj, , e and dQfd^ will not involve 
 any of these quantities, and in this case as in the former one 
 we have 
 
 -* K* & ......... (219) 
 
 so that the equations of equilibrium for gases and dilute 
 solutions are of exactly the same form. 
 
 113. The value of dw\d% measures the increase in the 
 potential energy of the system when the mass of is increased 
 by unity. Now if heat is produced when C and D combine 
 to form A and B, the potential energy diminishes as in- 
 creases, and when the quantity of heat is large its mechanical 
 equivalent may be taken as a measure of the decrease in 
 the potential energy. 
 
 If the combination of C and D is accompanied by the 
 production of heat, dwjd^ is negative, and we see therefore 
 
220 DYNAMICS. 
 
 that if 6 = o 
 
 or either or e must vanish, that is, the combination of C and 
 D will go on until one of these substances gives out, in other 
 words the reaction attended by the production of heat will at 
 the zero of absolute temperature go on as far as possible. 
 
 According to Berthelot's law of " Maximum Work " the 
 reaction accompanied by the formation of heat goes on as far 
 as possible at all temperatures, the equation (218) however 
 shows that this is strictly true only at the zero of temperature. 
 
 For substances which give out large quantities of heat 
 when they combine equation (218) shows that the com- 
 bination increases so rapidly as the temperature diminishes, 
 that if there is any combination at all at temperatures as 
 high as 1000 C., Berthelot's law will be practically true at 
 all ordinary temperatures. To illustrate this let us take 
 the case of hydrogen and oxygen, where the combination 
 is represented by the equation 
 
 2 H 2 + 2 =2H 2 0. 
 
 Let , y, be the quantities of hydrogen, oxygen and 
 water respectively, then a = 2, =i, c=2, d=o, and equa- 
 tion (218) becomes 
 
 c>2 2 (JV! 
 
 <--I*(0).**. 
 
 If we substitute for/(0) its value given on page 270 we 
 
 shall find that </> (0) in this case = C/0 3 ' 5 . For hydrogen at 
 
 oC. JK^O T'i x io 10 , and since in the combination of one 
 
 gramme of hydrogen with oxygen 34000 calories are given out, 
 
 dw 19 
 
 ^-=1.43x10". 
 
 Let us suppose that equivalent quantities of hydrogen 
 and oxygen are mixed together, and that the number of 
 equivalents which combine to form water is to the whole 
 
CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM. 221 
 
 number of equivalents of either oxygen or hydrogen present 
 initially as x to i, then x is given by the equation 
 
 2 fl 2 dlV 
 
 Suppose that at 1092 C. one half of the equivalents 
 combine, then the value of x at 546 C. is given by the 
 equation 
 
 3-5 /l, 30 _ 130\ 
 
 = 2.1 1 
 
 thus approximately 
 
 i 
 = - x 10 
 
 5 
 
 So that at this temperature only about one in five hun- 
 dred thousand of the molecules will be left uncombined. 
 Thus in a case like this very considerable dissociation at one 
 temperature is compatible with almost complete combina- 
 tion at a temperature not very much lower. 
 
 114. The effect of pressure on chemical equi- 
 librium. We have by equation (219) 
 
 thus if a + b 
 
 the ratio gJjg'irf is independent of the volume, so that if we 
 mix given quantities of the four substances the amount of 
 chemical action which will go on will be independent of 
 the volume into which the substances are put. Since the 
 chemical reaction is such that when A acts on B, a molecules 
 of A and b of B disappear while c of C and d of JD are 
 produced, we see that if a + b = c+d the number of mole- 
 cules in the vessel does not change as the reaction goes on. 
 This is sometimes expressed by saying that the combination 
 
222 DYNAMICS. 
 
 takes place without change of volume, and in this case, as 
 we have just seen, the amount of chemical combination is 
 not affected by the volume in which the combining sub- 
 stances are placed. If a + b is greater than c+d then the 
 larger the volume z/, the smaller will be the ratio of g^ to 
 t^rf. Now the action of C on D tends to diminish this ratio, 
 while that of A on B tends to increase it, and if a + b is 
 greater than c + d the number of molecules is increased 
 when C acts on D and diminished when A acts on B. 
 Thus we see from equation (219) that when chemical com- 
 bination alters the number of molecules the state of equi- 
 librium depends upon the volume within which the substances 
 are confined, and that the effect of increasing the volume is 
 to favour that reaction which is accompanied by an increase 
 in the number of molecules. In other words, the chemical 
 action which produces an increase in volume is hindered by 
 pressure, while that which produces a diminution is helped 
 by it. This is another example of the law stated in (84). 
 
 115. Let us now consider a little more closely some of 
 the results of equation (219), taking for the sake of simplicity 
 the case when a = b = cd i. 
 
 Let us suppose that the masses of the four substances 
 A, -B, C, D before combination begins are , iy , , e , and 
 that when they have reached the state of equilibrium a 
 quantity 8,/ of A has disappeared, then by equations (215) 
 we have 
 
 and equation (219) becomes 
 
 
MASS ACTIONS. 223 
 
 Let us suppose that the quantities of the substances 
 mixed together initially were proportional to their combining 
 weights, i.e. that initially equivalent quantities of the four 
 substances were taken, then we may put 
 
 And equation (220) becomes 
 
 if we put 
 
 t+p 
 then * = 
 
 and is called the affinity coefficient of the reaction (Muir's 
 Principles .of Chemistry, p. 417). Thus we may write equa- 
 tion (220) in the form 
 
 where / is constant as long as the temperature remains 
 unchanged. 
 
 The effects due to what are called " mass actions," that 
 is the effects produced by varying the quantities of the four 
 substances initially present may be deduced at once from 
 this equation. 
 
 Let S/j be the increase in / when is increased by S , 
 the quantities r/ , > e o remaining constant; and let S/ 2 , 8/ 3 , 
 8/ 4 be the respective increases when 77 , ^ , e are increased 
 by 877,,, 8^ , 8c respectively. Then we get at once from 
 equation (221) 
 
224 DYNAMICS. 
 
 where y is the positive quantity 
 
 or 
 
 We see from these equations that tyJ8 and fy>J$r) are 
 positive while S/ 3 /S , S/ 4 /^ are negative, so that any increase 
 in the quantity of A and B initially present increases the 
 amount of combination that goes on between these sub- 
 stances, while any increase in the quantities of C and D 
 initially present decreases the amount of combination, and 
 further that the effects of equal small changes in the masses 
 of A, B, C, D before combination takes place are inversely 
 proportional to the amount of these substances present in 
 the state of equilibrium. 
 
 In the more general case, where a, b, c, d are not each 
 put equal to unity, we may easily prove that 
 
 A- f , 
 
CHEMICAL COMBINATION. 22$ 
 
 and that if 8/ be the change in p due to an increase 87' 
 in volume, everything else being constant, 
 
 
 
 , 2 
 where y = y + __*+ _a + _, . 
 
 here a&^p is the mass of A which has disappeared. 
 
 1 1 6. The expression (221) agrees with the formula ob- 
 
 tained by Guldberg and Waage from quite different principles 
 
 (see Muir's Principles of Chemistry, p. 407, and Lothar Meyer, 
 
 Modernen Theorien der Chemie, chap. xm). The case when 
 
 a = b = c = d\s the only one however in which the expression 
 
 deduced from Hamilton's principle agrees with that given by 
 
 Guldberg and Waage. According to their theory, as given 
 
 in the works we have just cited, the equation (221) is 
 
 always true, while according to the theory we have been 
 
 explaining it is only true when a-b = c = d. It would seem 
 
 however that the principles from which Guldberg and Waage 
 
 deduced their equations would when a, b, c and d are not 
 
 all equal lead to equation (219) rather than (221), for their 
 
 point of view seems to be as follows. Consider first the 
 
 case when a = b = c = d =- i, then in a certain proportion 
 
 of the collisions which occur between the molecules of A 
 
 and B, chemical combination between A and B will take 
 
 place. The number of collisions in unit time is propor- 
 
 tional to the product of the numbers of molecules of A 
 
 and B, and so is proportional to jjt\. The number of cases 
 
 in which combination takes place may be taken therefore 
 
 to be k&\ when k is a quantity which is independent of the 
 
 quantities of A, B, (7, D present. In other words, the 
 
 number of molecules which leave the A, B states and enter 
 
 those of C and D is k&\ ; in a similar way we can see that 
 
 the number of molecules of C and D which become A and 
 
 T. D. 15 
 
226 DYNAMICS. 
 
 B is. 'e. Now when the system is in a steady state the 
 number of molecules of A and B formed must be the same 
 as the number which disappear, and therefore 
 
 V = 
 
 which is Guldberg's and Waage's equation. We can easily 
 see however that the above reasoning is only applicable 
 when chemical combination takes place between one 
 molecule of A and one of B, and again between one of C 
 and one of D, or in other words when a = b = c = d=i. If 
 on the other hand the equation which represents the chemi- 
 cal reaction is 
 
 2 (A) + (B) = (C) + 2 (D\ 
 
 then chemical combination will take place when one mole- 
 cule of B is in collision with two of A simultaneously ; the 
 number of such combinations will be proportional to i/* and 
 not to rjg, and thus the number of molecules of A which 
 disappear owing to their combination with B molecules 
 may be represented by ktff \ similarly the number of 
 molecules of D which disappear and of A which appear by 
 the combination of C and D may be represented by k'^ 2 ; 
 and since in the state of equilibrium the number of molecules 
 of A which disappear must be the same as the number 
 which appear we must have 
 
 hff = Ktf, 
 
 which agrees with equation (219) but not with Guldberg and 
 Waage's equation. 
 
 117. As we noticed before in (107), there is some 
 ambiguity as to what the molecule of the dissolved salt or 
 acid really is. For example, take the case already mentioned 
 where the reaction is represented by the equation 
 H 2 SO 4 + 2NaNO :j = 2 HNO 3 + Na.SO,, 
 we do not know whether the molecule of sodium nitrate is 
 
CHEMICAL COMBINATION. 
 
 227 
 
 represented by NaNO 3 or by Na 2 N 2 O 6 , or whether the 
 molecule of nitric acid is represented by HNO 3 or H 2 N 2 O 6 . 
 This point could probably be settled by experiments on 
 osmotic pressure, the lowering of the vapour pressure of the 
 solution and the effect of the salt or acid upon the freezing 
 point. If the molecules are represented by Na 2 N 2 O 6 , H 2 N 2 O 6 
 and not by NaNO 3 , HNO 3 , it would be necessary to dissolve 
 170 and 126 grammes of these substances in a litre of water, 
 instead of 85 and 63 to produce the effects observed in 
 solutions of one gramme equivalent per litre. 
 
 We can however use the formula (219) giving the amount 
 of chemical action between these substances to decide this 
 point. If the molecules are represented by HNO 3 , Na 2 SO 4 , 
 H 2 SO 4 and NaNo 3 then by equation (219) e 2 /?7 2 is constant 
 provided the temperature remains unaltered, if however the 
 molecules are represented by H 2 N 2 O 6 , Na 2 SO 4 , H 2 SO 4 , and 
 Na 2 N 2 O 6 (or by HNO 3 , JNa a SO 4 , JH 2 SO 4 , NaNOJ then 
 
 is constant as long as the temperature is unaltered, 
 where , 17, , e are the masses of the sulphuric acid, sodium 
 nitrate, nitric acid and sodium sulphate respectively. 
 
 This reaction has been investigated by Thomsen (Thermo- 
 chemische Untersuchungen i. p. 121) and in the following table 
 
 n 
 
 ef/& 
 
 *W 
 
 8 
 4 
 
 2.07 
 
 2.6 
 
 40.5 
 
 33 
 
 2 
 
 I 
 
 2-5 
 3-3 
 
 13-05 
 8 
 
 J 
 
 4.1 
 
 3-2 
 
 * 
 
 4.1 
 
 I.O 
 
 the values of eg/grf, /??, calculated from his experiments 
 
 2 
 
228 DYNAMICS. 
 
 for different proportions of the substances, are given, n is 
 the ratio of the number of equivalents of sodium sulphate 
 to the number of equivalents of nitric acid before chemical 
 combination commences. 
 
 It will be seen from this table that when there is only a 
 very small quantity of nitric acid present initially, formula 
 (219) seems to agree with the observations as well as (221), 
 but that it ceases to be any approximation when the solution 
 gets stronger, and that now equation (221) agrees better 
 with the experiments. From this we should conclude that 
 in very dilute solutions the molecules of nitric acid and 
 sodium nitrate rnay possibly be represented by HNO 3 , 
 NaNO 3 , but that in stronger solutions either they are re- 
 presented by H 2 N 2 O 6 , Na 2 N 2 O ti , or else that the molecules 
 of sulphuric acid and sodium sulphate are represented by 
 1H 2 SO 4 , JNa 2 SO 4 . Pfeffer's determination (98) of the 
 osmotic pressure produced by a potassium sulphate solution 
 suggests that the molecule is represented by J (K 2 SO 4 ). We 
 ought not however to attach as much weight to the experi- 
 ments with dilute solutions as to those with strong, because 
 in the weak solutions a very small error in the determina- 
 tions will produce a considerable error in the value of 
 2 /W or eC/ft. 
 
 If there was any change of this kind in the constitution 
 of the molecules as the strength of the solution increased 
 it would probably show itself in the effect of the substance 
 on the osmotic pressure, on the vapour pressure, and on 
 the lowering of the freezing point, even though these effects 
 were complicated by the alteration in the properties of the 
 solvent produced by the addition of the salt. 
 
 118. In the case we have just been considering the 
 four substances A, B, C, D were supposed to be either 
 
CHEMICAL COMBINATION. 22Q 
 
 gaseous or soluble. We must now see how the equations 
 have to be modified when one or more of the substances is 
 a solid, and if we are considering the case of solutions an 
 insoluble one. 
 
 Let us take first the case when only one of the substances 
 D is an insoluble solid, for example when the four bodies 
 are oxalic acid, calcium chloride, hydrochloric acid, and 
 calcium oxalate. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for D will now be of the 
 form 
 
 and the condition 
 
 dH 
 
 -rr 
 
 will lead to the equation 
 
 ** ............ (222 ). 
 
 If two of the substances are insoluble solids, as for 
 example when A is potassium carbonate, B barium sulphate, 
 C potassium sulphate, D barium carbonate, then we can 
 easily prove that 
 
 | = ^-^(0)/i<> .............. (223). 
 
 We see from these equations that the amount of com- 
 bination which goes on does not depend on the masses of 
 the insoluble substances. 
 
 119. As an example of a case where the conditions 
 are rather more complicated than in those discussed in the 
 last paragraph, we shall consider a case investigated by 
 Horstmann ( Watts' Dictionary of Chemistry, 3rd Supple- 
 ment, p. 433) where hydrogen, carbonic oxide and water 
 were exploded, and water and carbonic acid produced. 
 
230 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Here we have to consider five substances, hydrogen, 
 carbonic oxide, oxygen, water, and carbonic acid ; let , ?, 
 , c, TT, be the masses of these substances respectively, and 
 let c lt r 2 ,...<: 5 , be their molecular weights. 
 
 Let the relation between the pressure /, the density p, 
 and the absolute temperature be for hydrogen 
 
 p-Rfa 
 
 for carbonic acid 
 
 with a corresponding notation for the others. 
 
 Let the mean Lagrangian function for the hydrogen be 
 
 where v is the volume in which the gases are confined, and 
 o/j the mean potential energy of unit mass of hydrogen. 
 The mean Lagrangian function of the other gases will be 
 given by analogous expressions. 
 
 Now whatever changes go on among the various gases we 
 have since the quantity of hydrogen is constant 
 
 - + = a constant ; 
 fi ^ 
 
 since the carbon is constant 
 
 -n TT 
 
 + - = a constant : 
 
 ', '5 
 since the oxygen is constant 
 
 1 f] i 7T 
 
 i-+ ~ + i-+-=a constant ; 
 
 2 ' 2 ^3 ^ ^ 
 
 these are three equations between five unknown quantities, 
 so that if we give arbitrary variations to two of them the 
 variations of the others will be determinate. 
 
CHEMICAL COMBINATION. 231 
 
 Let us choose and rj as the independent variables, then 
 when 1} is constant we have 
 
 and when is constant 
 
 When the system is in equilibrium the mean Lagrangian 
 function is stationary for all possible variations, so that we 
 must have 
 
 fdff\ = Q idff\ 
 
 \ dc, / 17 constant \ drf /^constant 
 
 Remembering that 
 
 the first equation gives 
 
 e ,k - 1 ( d ^L\ 
 
 -! = d> (6) g^Ki 6 ^ />? constant .......... (224), 
 
 8* 
 
 and the second 
 
 i i fdw\ 
 
 ' lA^V^ /Constant 
 
 where w is the mean potential energy of the mixture of 
 gases. 
 
 These are of the same form as the equations I obtained 
 from kinematical considerations alone in my paper on the 
 Chemical Combination of Gases already referred to. 
 
 If we divide (224) by (225) we get 
 
 > MKf )-(!")! 
 
232 DYNAMICS. 
 
 so that, as long as the temperature is constant, the ratio of 
 the quantity of water formed to the quantity of carbonic 
 acid always bears a constant ratio to the ratio of the 
 quantity of free hydrogen to that of free carbonic oxide. 
 This was the result obtained by Horstmann in the experi- 
 ments before mentioned. 
 
CHAPTER XV. 
 
 EFFECTS PRODUCED BY ALTERATIONS IN THE 
 PHYSICAL CONDITIONS ON THE COEFFICIENT 
 OF CHEMICAL COMBINATION. 
 
 120. SINCE the value of 
 
 *c 
 
 IV 
 
 is independent of the values of , rj, , e, and since when it 
 is known the amount of chemical combination can be 
 determined, it is convenient to have a name for it, we 
 shall therefore call it the coefficient of chemical combination 
 for A and B and denote it by k. The more intense the 
 chemical action between A and B the smaller the values 
 of , 77 in the state of equilibrium and therefore the larger 
 the value of k. 
 
 We have by equation (220) 
 
 a dQ a dw 
 
 k = <^> l (ff)e **# e*i* ^ (226). 
 
 The alterations which we shall suppose to take place 
 in the physical conditions can be represented by changes 
 8(2 and 8w in the values of Q and w, and we see from 
 
234 DYNAMICS. 
 
 equation (226) that if k be the corresponding change 
 in k 
 
 a d&Q a 
 
 *" " 
 
 If the substances with which we have to deal are gases 
 we must put Q and &Q equal to zero. We considered when 
 we were discussing dissociation in chapter xiv. most of the 
 changes in the physical conditions which could influence the 
 state of chemical equilibrium in this case, and the results 
 obtained then will apply to the more general problem we 
 are discussing now. We see from (227) that any cause 
 producing a change in the potential energy which increases 
 as any chemical action goes on will tend to stop this action 
 which will not have to go on so far before attaining equili- 
 brium as it would if the disturbing cause had been absent 
 and vice versa. 
 
 We shall now go on to consider more particularly the 
 cases of dilute solutions and the effects produced upon 
 chemical equilibrium by changes in the properties of the 
 solvent arising from the progress of chemical change. 
 
 121. Effect of Surface Tension. The first effect 
 we shall consider is that due to the surface tension of the 
 solution. We know that the surface tension depends upon 
 the strength and the nature of the solution, so that since 
 the composition changes as chemical action goes on the 
 surface tension of the solvent and therefore its mean 
 Lagrangian function will change ; and therefore by the 
 principle we have just stated the conditions for equilibrium 
 will be altered by the surface tension. 
 
 Let A be the area of the surface of the solution, T the 
 surface tension, then the potential energy due to the surface 
 
CHEMICAL COMBINATION. 235 
 
 tension is TA and there is therefore in the expression for 
 the mean Lagrangian function the term TA, so that by 
 equation (227) the effect of the surface tension on the 
 coefficient of chemical combination is given by the 
 equation - 
 
 -- d (AT*} 
 k ~ Rfd^ 
 
 Let us endeavour to get some idea of the magnitude of 
 this effect. If c is the molecular weight of the substance 
 whose mass is , then since at o C. 
 
 iT x io, 
 we have, if for simplicity a be put equal to unity, 
 
 No\v cd (A T}jd is the increase in A T when the quantity 
 in the solution is increased by one gramme-equivalent. 
 If v be the volume of the vessel whose surface we shall 
 suppose to remain constant as combination goes on, then 
 
 where T' is the increase in T when the quantity is increased 
 by one gramme-equivalent per litre. Now the experiments 
 of Rontgen and Schneider (" Oberflachen Spannung von 
 Fliissigkeiten," Wied. Ann. xxix. 165) show that T' even in 
 the case of simple salts may be as much as 5 or 6 so that 
 
 8& . ? A 
 
 T is of the order -=- . 
 k 10' v 
 
 and if the solution be spread out in a film of thickness /, 
 
236 DYNAMICS. 
 
 A/v = 2// so that 
 
 6 
 
 6/e . 01 
 
 T is of the order,-; 
 
 thus if the thickness of the film is i/ioooo of a centimetre 
 the value of k is altered by about '6 per cent. If the 
 thickness of the layer is comparable with molecular distance, 
 say about io~ 7 , then kjk might be as large as 6. This of 
 course implies that the conditions of equilibrium would 
 be completely altered. Thus in very thin films the in- 
 fluence of capillarity might be sufficient to modify com- 
 pletely the nature of chemical equilibrium, though we 
 should not expect it to do much in the body of a fluid. 
 
 If the surface tension increases as the chemical action 
 goes on the capillarity will tend to stop the action, while if 
 the surface tension diminishes as the action goes on, the 
 capillarity will tend to increase the action. 
 
 Thus the chemical action in a space such as a thin 
 film throughout which the forces producing capillary 
 phenomena are active might be very different from the 
 chemical action in the same substance in bulk when most 
 of it would be free from the action of such forces. 
 
 This point does not seem to have received as much 
 attention as it deserves, but there are some phenomena 
 which seem to point to the existence of such an effect. One 
 of these is that called by its discoverer Liebreich " the dead 
 space in chemical reactions," which is well illustrated by 
 the behaviour of an alkaline solution of chloral hydrate. 
 If the proportion of alkali to chloral is properly adjusted, 
 chloroform is slowly deposited as a white precipitate, and if 
 this solution is placed in a test-tube, then at the top of the 
 liquid there is a thin film which remains quite clear and free 
 from chloroform, showing that, unless this effect is due to 
 
, T He 
 
 fNIVERSITl 
 CHEMICAL COMBINATION. iF^MN^V 
 
 some chemical action of the air, the alkali and chloral do 
 not combine, or if they do chloroform is not precipitated. 
 In fine capillary tubes too, no deposit seems to be formed. 
 This phenomenon could be explained on the above 
 principles if the surface tension of the alkaline solution 
 increases when the alkali combines with the chloral and 
 chloroform is deposited, for in this case the surface tension 
 would increase as chemical action went on, and would 
 therefore tend to stop this action. Dr Monckman made 
 some experiments in the Cavendish Laboratory on the 
 changes in the surface tension of the solution as the 
 reaction went on, and he found that it increased to a 
 very considerable extent, so that this case is in accordance 
 with our theory. The thickness of the dead space (from i 
 to 2 mm. in Liebreich's experiments) is somewhat greater 
 than we should have expected, but any want of uniformity 
 in the liquid such as that produced by the deposition of 
 chloroform itself would increase the thickness of the dead 
 space. 
 
 Some other effects produced by surface tension are 
 discussed by Prof. Liveing in his paper " On the Influence 
 of Capillary Action in some Chemical Decompositions " 
 (Proceedings Camb. Phil. Soc. vi. p. 66). 
 
 122. Effects due to pressure. Pressure can pro- 
 duce effects of two kinds upon chemical action. The first 
 is when the volume of the liquid under pressure alters as 
 chemical action goes on, the effect of pressure in this case 
 is proportional to the amount of the pressure: the second 
 effect is when the coefficient of compressibility of the liquid 
 changes as the chemical action goes on, the effect of 
 pressure due to this cause is proportional to the square of 
 the pressure. 
 
 Let us suppose that P is the external pressure, v 
 
238 DYNAMICS. 
 
 the volume, we may regard the external pressure as 
 produced by an external system whose mean Lagrangian 
 function is 
 
 and we have by equation (227) 
 
 ?*- a - 
 k ~' 
 
 dv 
 
 Thus if v increases with , k is positive, in other words 
 the value of Tg^l^if is increased and therefore and TJ are 
 less than they would be if there were no external pressure. 
 Thus the external pressure tends to stop that action which 
 is accompanied by an increase in volume, and vice versa. 
 
 Let us now endeavour to form some estimate of the 
 probable size of this effect. If the molecules of the 
 substance produce the same pressure as if they were in 
 the gaseous state, then at o C. 
 
 2-2 
 
 where c is the combining weight of the substance. Thus if 
 the volume increases by y cubic centimetres per gramme of 
 A formed we have by (228) if the pressure is x atmospheres, 
 
 cxya 
 
 k 2'2 X I0 4 ' 
 
 The cases in which in general y will have the greatest 
 value are those in which we have some of the bodies in 
 solution while others are precipitated, if we suppose that 
 when a salt is dissolved the volume of the solvent is not 
 altered then y will in general be not greatly different from 
 unity, and in this case we have 
 
CHEMICAL COMBINATION. 239 
 
 S/ cax 
 
 so that it would require a pressure of 22ofac atmospheres to 
 change the coefficient of combination by one per cent, thus 
 if the substances taking part in the reaction have large 
 combining weights, the reaction will be sensitive to the 
 influence of pressure. 
 
 Let us now consider the effect on the chemical equi- 
 librium when the coefficient of compressibility changes as 
 the chemical action goes on. 
 
 Let o- be the expansion or contraction of the solution, 
 K its bulk-modulus, v its volume, then in the expression for 
 the potential energy of the solvent there is the term 
 
 ir/o-V, 
 
 and therefore in the expression for the mean Lagrangian 
 function the term 
 
 If S/ be the change in the coefficient of combination due to 
 the change in K as the chemical action progresses we have 
 by equation (227) 
 
 Now if P be the external pressure 
 
 K<r = P. 
 
 Substituting for cr the value given by this equation we 
 get 
 
 k av P* dK 
 
 = * .................. (229) ' 
 
 To get some idea of the magnitude of this effect let us 
 suppose that when the mass of A in the solution is in- 
 creased by one gramme-equivalent per litre the value of K 
 is increased in the proportion of y to i. 
 
240 DYNAMICS. 
 
 i d* yx io 3 
 
 1 nen r. = , 
 
 K d v x c ' 
 
 where c is the molecular weight of , we have therefore by 
 equation (229) 
 
 && ay P* 
 
 _ _ <S ____ __ V T f\ 
 
 ~ 
 
 K 
 NOW CR 1 0=2'2 X I O 10 , 
 
 and for water, 
 
 K= 2'2 X IO 10 . 
 
 So that if the pressure is x atmospheres 
 
 k ax*y 
 
 -T = =f- approximately. 
 
 From the results of Rontgen and Schneider's experi- 
 ments given in (97) we see that y will often be as large 
 as i/io, so that in this case, supposing a unity, the effect 
 of a pressure of 100 atmospheres would be to alter k by 
 i/io per cent, while a pressure of 1000 atmospheres would 
 alter it by io per cent. 
 
 If the bulk-modulus increases as increases then the 
 action of the pressure is to retard the chemical action by 
 which increases. 
 
 123. Effect of magnetism on chemical action. 
 
 The magnetic properties of solutions are generally so feeble 
 that we cannot expect magnetism to produce any effect 
 except upon those which contain iron. In some of the 
 chemical actions however in which iron is dissolved or 
 deposited magnetism does seem to affect the result. Thus 
 when a solution of copper sulphate is placed on an iron 
 plate copper is deposited and iron dissolved, and if this 
 plate be placed over the poles of a powerful electro-magnet 
 it is found that the copper deposit is thinnest over the poles, 
 the places where the magnetic force is the most powerful. 
 
MAGNETISM AND CHEMICAL ACTION. 241 
 
 The effect of the magnetic force is easily found. Let / 
 be the intensity of magnetization of the solution, I' that 
 of the iron plate, H and H' the magnetic forces and k' and 
 k" the coefficients of magnetization of the solution and iron 
 plate respectively, v and v r the volumes of these substances, 
 then if k' and k" are constant there is by 34 the term 
 
 2 {k k 
 
 in the expression for the mean Lagrangian function. 
 Thus we have by equation (227) 
 
 k 2^,t 
 
 where o- is the density of the iron, and the quantity of 
 iron in the solution. 
 
 Since H = k'l, 
 
 we get 
 
 k a //' 2 J z dk' \ 
 
 = ( ,, j v } . 
 
 k 2R$ \k V k' 2 d ) 
 
 dk' 
 Since in practice f' 2 /k"o- is greater than I 2 -r- vfk f we 
 
 see that k will be positive and will increase with /', hence 
 since k = V/Y, tne quantity of iron dissolved will be 
 least where /' is greatest, that is where the magnetic field 
 is strongest, which agrees with the results of experiment. 
 
 We can show in a similar way that any chemical action 
 which produces an increase in the coefficient of magnetiza- 
 tion is hindered by the action of magnetic forces. 
 
 If we place a solution of an iron salt in a magnetic field 
 where the strength is not uniform the magnetic force will 
 cause the strength of the solution to be greater in those 
 T. D. 16 
 
242 DYNAMICS. 
 
 parts of the field where the force is intense than in those 
 where it is weak. 
 
 To calculate the magnitude of the effect due to this 
 cause let us suppose that the solution is contained in two 
 vessels connected with each other by a tube of small bore, 
 and that one vessel is placed in a region where the magnetic 
 force vanishes, the other in one where it is constant and 
 equal to H. Then if and rj are the number of molecules 
 of the salt in unit volume of the first and second of these 
 vessels respectively, we can easily prove by equating to zero 
 the variation of the mean Lagrangian function for the liquid 
 in the two vessels that 
 
 i P dk 
 
 ^i' 10 *^** 5 #' 
 
 where k' is the coefficient of magnetization of the solution. 
 Thus if the coefficient of magnetization increases with the 
 strength of the solution the magnetic force will tend to drive 
 the salt from the weak to the strong parts of the magnetic 
 field. 
 
CHAPTER XVI. 
 
 CHANGE OF STATE FROM SOLID TO LIQUID. 
 
 124. THE cases we have hitherto considered have 
 been those in which gases and dilute solutions have been 
 chiefly concerned, in this chapter we shall consider the 
 phenomena of solution, fusion and solidification in which 
 liquids and solids play the chief part. 
 
 Solution. 
 
 125. Let us consider the case of a mixture of salt 
 and solvent in equilibrium, and endeavour to find how 
 the amount of salt dissolved depends upon various physical 
 circumstances. 
 
 Let be the mass of the salt, rj that of the solution. 
 Let us for brevity denote dpjdQ for unit volume of the salt 
 by co and the corresponding quantity for the solution 
 by u>'. Let a/,, w 2 be the potential energies of unit 
 masses of the salt and solution respectively. 
 
 Then the mean Lagrangian function for the salt is 
 
 -to, 
 
 16 2 
 
244 DYNAMICS. 
 
 where / (0) is the part of the mean kinetic energy of unit 
 mass which does not depend upon the controllable coordi- 
 nates. 
 
 If v be the volume of the salt and we put 
 
 then the Lagrangian function for the salt may be written 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the solution is with a 
 similar notation 
 
 where f a (0) is the part of the kinetic energy of unit mass of 
 the liquid which does not depend upon the controllable co- 
 ordinates, and v is the volume of the solution. We must 
 remember that though O and w l do not depend upon the 
 values of and ij yet the values of O', w z and f a (9) may do 
 so as the properties of the solution may and generally do alter 
 when the amount of salt the solution contains is altered. 
 
 By the Hamiltonian principle the value of the mean 
 Lagrangian function of the salt and solution when in 
 equilibrium is stationary. 
 
 Let us suppose that when the system is in equilibrium 
 the conditions are disturbed by a mass 8$ of the salt 
 melting, then the change in the value of H is, if <r 
 be the density of the salt, p that of the solution, 
 
 Since the value of H is stationary this quantity must 
 
SOLUTION. 245 
 
 vanish when there is equilibrium so that we get 
 
 0' d& , i d . /m O / (0) 
 
 f 
 
 if we knew how the quantities in this equation varied with 
 the amount of salt dissolved we could use it to determine 
 the amount of salt dissolved when the solution is saturated. 
 But though we have not this knowledge and therefore can- 
 not use this equation to determine the solubility of a salt 
 in a given solvent, we can still get a good deal of informa- 
 tion from it about the effect produced by various physical 
 circumstances on the solubility. 
 
 126. The first effect of this kind we shall consider 
 is that of pressure ; and, just as in the case of chemical 
 combination, pressure will produce two effects, one de- 
 pending on the change of volume which takes place on 
 solution, the other on the change produced in the co- 
 efficient of compressibility. 
 
 Let us consider first the effect due to the change in 
 volume. 
 
 We may suppose that the external pressure is produced 
 by a weight placed on a piston which presses on the fluid, 
 the mean Lagrangian function of this system is 
 
 -PV, 
 
 where V is the volume of the salt and solution ; the increase 
 in this when diminishes by S is 
 
246 DYNAMICS. 
 
 so that in this case instead of (230) we have now 
 
 We shall endeavour to find the change in temperature 
 which would produce the same effect on the solubility as 
 the pressure/. 
 
 We may regard the expression 
 
 O 
 
 as a function of , say/(), then if be increased by 80 the 
 corresponding change S in is, by equation (230), approxi- 
 mately given by the equation 
 
 this equation is only approximate as we have neglected 
 the variations of Q, O', f } (0)/0 and f 2 (6)/0 with the tem- 
 perature. 
 
 If S x be the change produced by the pressure /, the 
 temperature remaining constant, we have by equation (231) 
 
 so that the change 80 in the temperature which would pro- 
 duce the same effect as the pressure/ is given by the equation 
 
SOLUTION. 247 
 
 Now w + ri - w, is the increase in the potential 
 ay 
 
 energy when unit mass of the salt dissolves; this will be 
 measured by q the mechanical equivalent of the heat 
 absorbed in this process at zero temperature, or at any 
 temperature, if the specific heat of the system does not 
 change as the salt dissolves: making this substitution 
 equation (232) becomes 
 
 If the volume diminishes as the salt dissolves 
 is positive, so that if q be positive the effect of pressure 
 is the same as that of an increase in temperature, while 
 if the volume increases as the salt dissolves the effect of 
 pressure will be the same as that of a diminution in 
 temperature. 
 
 The effect of pressure upon the solubility of various 
 salts has been investigated by Sorby (Proceedings Royal 
 Society, xii. p. 538, 1863). The salts he examined were 
 sodium chloride, copper sulphate, and the ferri- and ferro- 
 cyanides of potassium. He found that when the volume 
 increased on solution the solubility was diminished by 
 pressure, while when the volume diminished on solution 
 the solubility was increased by the same means. This 
 agrees with the results of equation (233). 
 
 The results of his experiments are given in the following 
 table the first column of which gives the name of the salt 
 dissolved, the second the increase in volume when 100 c.c. 
 of the salt crystallizes out, the third the increase in the 
 salt dissolved when a pressure of 100 atmospheres is ap- 
 plied, and the fourth the value of this quantity calculated 
 by (233) 
 
248 
 
 DYNAMICS. 
 
 13-57 
 
 419 
 
 56 
 
 4-83 
 
 3'i83 
 
 2-4 
 
 2-51 
 
 o-335 
 
 28 
 
 31-21 
 
 2-914 
 
 4'4 
 
 8-9 
 
 2-845 
 
 
 Sodium Chloride 
 Copper Sulphate 
 Potassium Ferricyanide 
 Potassium Sulphate 
 Potassium Ferrocyanide 
 
 The numbers required to calculate by the aid of (233) 
 the theoretical amount of the alteration in the solubility are 
 given below. 
 
 The heat absorbed when the salt dissolves depends upon 
 the strength of the solution and the temperature, the value 
 of q required for our purpose is that which corresponds to a 
 saturated solution at the zero of absolute temperature; as 
 the variations in the value of q with temperature are probably 
 due to changes in the specific heat the effect of these 
 changes will be smaller the lower the temperature, we shall 
 always therefore take the heat of dissolution for the lowest 
 temperature at which it has been observed, though when 
 the variation with temperature is rapid this can only be a 
 very rough approximation. 
 
 Sodium chloride. 
 
 q at o C. for a strong solution 
 
 51 
 58 
 
 x 4-1 x 10 
 
 (Ostwald's Lehrbuch der Allgemeinen Chemie, n. p. 170). 
 Specific gravity = 2-1 (Watts' Dictionary of Chemistry, 
 
 v. p. 335)- 
 
 According to Gay-Lussac (Annales de Chemie et de Phy- 
 sique, xi. p. 310, 1819) the increase in solubility for each 
 degree centigrade is 
 
 j!7_ o/ 
 
 _, 1 J /O' 
 
 Sulphate of copper. 
 
SOLUTION. 249 
 
 q at 15 C.? - -^- 2 x 4-1 x io 9 (Ostwald, Lehrbuch, n. 
 
 249 ' 3 p. 250). 
 
 Specific gravity = 2*2 (Watts' Dictionary of Chemistry, v. 
 
 590- 
 
 Increase of salt dissolved for a rise in temperature of 
 i C. = 1 7% (Watts' Dictionary of Chemistry, v. 591). 
 
 Ferricyanide of Potassium. 
 
 q at i5C.?= x 4-1 x 109 (Ostwald, Lehrbuch, n. 
 
 P- 352). 
 
 Specific gravity = i '8 (Watts' Dictionary of Chemistry ', 
 ii. 247). 
 
 Increase of salt dissolved for a rise in temperature of 
 i C. = 1-27% (Watts' Dictionary, n. 247). 
 
 Potassium sulphate. 
 #at i5C.?= - x 4-1 x io s (Ostwald, Lehrbuch, n. p. 162). 
 
 Specific gravity = 2 '6 (Watts' Dictionary, v. 607). 
 
 Increase of salt dissolved for a rise in temperature of 
 i C. = 2/ (Gay-Lussac, Annales de Chemie et de Physique, 
 
 XL p. 311, 1819). 
 
 I have not been able to find corresponding data for the 
 ferrocyanide of potassium. 
 
 As an example of the way in which the effects of pres- 
 sure can be calculated from these data let us take the case 
 of sodium chloride: since 13*57/100 is the increase in 
 volume when i c.c. of the salt crystallizes out, and 2'i is 
 the specific gravity of the salt, 
 
 dV 'i357 
 
250 DYNAMICS. 
 
 When the pressure is 100 atmospheres and the temperature 
 15 C. 
 
 /=io 8 , 
 
 (9=288, 
 so that by equation (233) 
 
 8tf = 288x58 x -1357 x io 8 
 5-6 x 4*1 x 2'i x io 9 
 
 80 = 4'4 C., 
 
 and since the solubility increases '13% f r each degree, the 
 solubility is increased by the pressure by -56 parts in 100. 
 
 Considering the imperfect nature of the data at our 
 disposal the agreement between the theory and the experi- 
 ments seems as close as could have been expected. 
 
 So far we have neglected the effect of the difference 
 between the compressibility of the salt and the solution, but 
 as this may be very considerable it is necessary to investi- 
 gate this effect in order to see when it may legitimately be 
 omitted. 
 
 If the bulk modulus of the salt is k, and that of the 
 solvent k', then in the mean Lagrangian function of the 
 two there is the term 
 
 - - ktv - - k'e' 2 v, 
 
 2 2 
 
 where as before v and v' are the volumes of the salt and the 
 solution respectively, and e and e their contractions. 
 
 Taking this term into account we find that the condition 
 dH 
 
 r 
 
 leads to the equation 
 
 d . . 
 
 dw, dV i / i i f d 
 
 -- w --~ ' 
 
 ,\ 
 
 !' 
 
SOLUTION. 251 
 
 and if 8(9 is the increase in temperature which would 
 produce the same effect as the pressure 
 
 ( dV i p 2 i i / d ,,, ) 
 80 = -\p-jfT + - -7 - + - TT 2 -jj. (kv) \ . 
 q Y d 2 k o- 2 k 2 d v ' } 
 
 Since k' is of the order io 10 , we see that if the change 
 which takes place in the volume of the salt when it dissolves 
 amounts to one per cent, of its original volume the terms 
 involving p 2 are not so important as those involving p if 
 the pressure is not more than 100 atmospheres. For very 
 much larger pressures however the terms depending upon 
 p 2 will be the most important, and in this case the effect 
 of the pressure will be proportional to the square of the 
 pressure and not to its first power, as in the cases examined 
 by Sorby. 
 
 127. Effect of Surface Tension upon the 
 Solubility. Surface tension may affect the amount of 
 salt required to saturate a solution in several ways. 
 
 In the first place the surface tension of the solution may 
 change as the salt dissolves; secondly, the alteration which 
 takes place in the volume may change the area of the 
 surface in contact with the glass or the air, and again when 
 the salt dissolves or is deposited the surface of contact of 
 the salt and solution may change ; when the salt is pre- 
 cipitated as a fine powder this increase in surface may be 
 very considerable. 
 
 To find the effect of these changes on the solubility, let 
 S be a surface of the solvent, T its surface tension. Then 
 in the expression for the mean Lagrangian function of the 
 solvent there is the term 
 
 -ITS, 
 
 where the summation is extended over all the surfaces of 
 the solvent. 
 
252 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Then we get by applying the same methods as before, 
 
 proceeding as in 126 we see that the increase 80 in the 
 temperature which would produce the same effect as the 
 surface tension is given by the equation 
 
 (234), 
 
 so that if TS increases as the salt dissolves the effect of the 
 surface tension will be to retard solution, while it will 
 increase the solubility if TS diminishes. 
 
 Let us take as an example the case when the fluid is in 
 spherical drops and consider the effect of the change in 
 volume which takes place as the salt dissolves. If a is the 
 radius of the drop and / the increase in volume when unit 
 mass of the salt dissolves, then 
 
 d ,, 
 
 so that if S be the surface 
 
 dS da 
 
 and therefore by equation (234) 
 
 *-.-* 
 
 qa 
 
SOLUTION. 253 
 
 Let us take the case of potassium sulphate, for which 
 i 1 1 12 and ^= 1*5 x io 9 , 
 
 80 2T 
 
 a 1-8 x io lo; 
 since Tis about 81, we have at the temperature of 27C. 
 
 80 = Q - approximately, 
 
 so that if the radius of the drops was i/ioooo of a milli- 
 metre 
 
 80= -2-, 
 
 10 
 
 and since the solubility increases by 2 / for each degree of 
 temperature the solubility of spray of this fineness would be 
 diminished by about -6 / . 
 
 In this case the effect of the surface tension is very 
 small, but if the salt were deposited from its solution as a 
 very fine powder the effect of the increase in the surface 
 might be much more considerable. 
 
 Let us suppose that the salt is deposited in the shape of 
 small spheres of radius a, then 
 
 and if T' be the surface tension of the salt and solution we 
 shall have 
 
 ^ = A IL - 
 ~ a-a q ' 
 
 in some cases the particles in which the salt is deposited are 
 fine enough to scatter light, so that their diameter must be 
 much less than the wave length of the blue rays, we may 
 
254 DYNAMICS. 
 
 therefore put a = io~ 6 ; we do not know the value of T' but 
 it is probably greater than T for the surface of contact 
 of air and the solution; even though it were no greater 
 we should have with these numbers for potassium sulphate 
 
 80 i 
 
 y = approximately, 
 
 so that at 2jC. the solubility would be changed by about 
 60 per cent. This effect would help the salt to dissolve 
 and prevent its deposition from the solution. If the salt 
 before solution was not in a very finely divided condition 
 the diminution in the surface caused by the solution would 
 be much less than the increase in the surface due to the 
 deposition of the salt, so that surface tension would be much 
 more efficacious in preventing deposition from the solution 
 than in helping the salt to dissolve, it would thus tend to 
 promote something analogous to super-saturation. 
 
 Let us now consider the effect due to the alteration in 
 the surface tension of the solution with the quantity of salt 
 dissolved. We have as before 
 
 80 SdT 
 
 According to Rontgen and Schneider (Wied. Annalen, 
 xxix. p. 209, 1886) the surface tension of an 8 / solution of 
 potassium sulphate is about 3 / greater than that of pure 
 water, for this substance we have therefore, approximately, 
 
 dT _ 81x3 
 4 Sv ' 
 
 where v is the volume of solution ; substituting this value for 
 dTjdt; in equation (235) and putting q i -5 x io 9 , 
 
 
SOLUTION. 255 
 
 80 81x3 S 
 
 x 
 
 6 8 x i -5 x io 9 v 
 
 = a approximately. 
 
 io 8 v 
 
 If the solution is in a cylindrical tube of radius a, S/v = 2 /a, 
 and therefore 
 
 SO 4 
 
 -Q 8 a approximately. 
 
 The sign is changed because if the angle of contact 
 vanishes the increase in the surface tension of the surface 
 separating the solution and air is equal to the diminution 
 in that separating the solution and the walls of the tube. 
 If we suppose that these cylindrical tubes are of the dimen- 
 sions of the pores in such substances as meerschaum or 
 graphite, then since we know by the laws of diffusion of 
 gases through these substances that the diameter of the 
 pores must be comparable with the mean free path of a 
 molecule of the gas we may assume that a is of the order 
 10 ~ 6 . In this case 
 
 W _^_ 
 
 i oo ' 
 
 so that at 27 C. the value of W would be about 12 C, 
 which in the case of potassium sulphate is equivalent to 
 an increase in the solubility by nearly 25 / . In most cases 
 the surface tension of the surface separating a solution 
 from air increases with the amount of salt in it, so that 
 the salt will be more soluble in liquid in capillary spaces 
 than in liquid in bulk. 
 
 Liquefaction. 
 
 128. Under this head we shall consider the influence 
 of changes in the physical condition on the passage of a 
 substance from the solid to the liquid state and vice versa. 
 
256 DYNAMICS. 
 
 This problem has much in common with that of solution, 
 but since in this case the liquid and solid are the same 
 substances in different states, the properties of the liquid 
 will not, as in that case, change as the solid melts. 
 
 Let be the mass of the solid, by 81 its mean Lagran- 
 gian function is 
 
 where w l is the potential energy of unit mass of the 
 substance in the solid state. 
 
 Since the Lagrangian function is proportional to the 
 volume, we may put 
 
 ( 
 
 J 
 
 5*- 
 
 where v is the volume of the solid. 
 
 If rj l is the mass of the liquid, v' its volume, W 2 the 
 potential energy of unit mass, the Lagrangian function of 
 the liquid is 
 
 where O' is denned by the equation 
 
 The terms /,(#), / 2 (#) are the parts of the Lagrangian 
 function which do not depend upon strain &c., that is, they 
 do not involve the controllable coordinates. They are 
 therefore independent of the arrangement of the molecules 
 and depend merely upon the number of the molecules and 
 the kinetic energy possessed by each. We should therefore 
 expect that so long as the temperature remains constant 
 these terms would not alter much however the arrangement 
 of the molecules might change, provided the molecules were 
 not decomposed. 
 
LIQUEFACTION. 257 
 
 If there is no external pressure the change in the mean 
 Lagrangian function of the solid and liquid when the mass 
 8 of the liquid freezes is 
 
 ?- 7) 
 
 where o- and p are the densities of the solid and liquid 
 respectively, 
 
 This change must vanish by the Hamiltonian principle 
 when the system is in equilibrium, so that in this case we 
 have 
 
 We may regard the left-hand side of this equation as a 
 function of 6, say <f> (0), which when equated to zero gives 
 the temperature at which melting takes place. 
 
 Let us now consider the effect of a slight change in the 
 physical conditions. If this change increases the Lagrangian 
 function by x and does not affect appreciably the values of 
 O/cr, O'/p, we have if the melting point is now 6 + 30, 
 
 or since <f> (0) = o 
 
 Let us consider the effect of pressure upon the freezing 
 point. If the external pressure is / then 
 
 x = -p(v + i/) 9 
 and since 
 
 T. D. 
 
258 DYNAMICS. 
 
 so that 
 
 But from equation (116) we have 
 
 S C = <?S, (%) 
 ^ \dOj 
 
 V constant 
 
 and if the heat supplied is just sufficient to melt unit mass 
 of ice, 8<2 = A, the latent heat of liquefaction and v = i/p - i/<r, 
 hence 
 
 whence if 80 be the increase in caused by the pressure / 
 
 comparing this with (237) we see that 
 
 afo (0) _ X 
 ~dO~ ~0' 
 and equation (237) becomes 
 
 So that if the Lagrangian function increases when the liquid 
 freezes, the temperature at which freezing takes place is 
 raised, in other words freezing is facilitated. This is 
 another example of the principle of 84. 
 
 We see from equation (238) that if the body expands 
 on solidification 80 is negative or the melting point is 
 lowered by pressure, if the body contracts on solidification 
 W is positive and the melting point is raised by pressure. 
 This is the well-known effect predicted by Prof. James 
 Thomson and verified by the experiments of Sir William 
 Thomson. 
 
 This however is not the only effect produced by pressure 
 
LIQUEFACTION. 259 
 
 on the melting point, there is another effect arising from the 
 difference between the energy due to strains produced by 
 the pressure in unit mass before and after solidification. 
 This energy is proportional to the square of the pressure, so 
 that the lowering of the freezing point from this cause will 
 also be proportional to the square of the pressure. 
 
 Let as before / be the pressure per unit area acting on 
 the solid and liquid, let k be the modulus of compression 
 of the solid, k' that of the liquid, the potential energy due 
 to the strain in the solid and liquid is 
 
 so that in the mean Lagrangian function of the solid and 
 liquid there is the term 
 
 -/ \v a (i - 8) + ,' (i - a-)} - j *ja? - j.*8", 
 
 where 8 and 8' are the compressions and v and z> ' the 
 volumes, <T O and p the densities of the solid and liquid when 
 free from pressure. 
 
 If 80 be the rise in the melting point due to this cause 
 Ave see from (239) that 
 
 
 Po 2 O'o 2 PC 
 
 I 
 
 So that unless k<r = k'p Q the freezing point will be altered 
 by an amount proportional to the square of the pressure. 
 
 Let us find the magnitude of this effect in the case of ice 
 and water. The only constant of elasticity for ice which 
 has been determined is Young's modulus, which Bevan de- 
 termined by flexure experiments to be about 6 x io 10 , the 
 modulus of compression k is therefore not likely to be less 
 
 172 
 
260 DYNAMICS. 
 
 than 4 x io 10 . The value of this quantity for water is about 
 2 x io 10 . Substituting these values we get 
 
 3(9 i 
 
 <r = -8^' - 
 
 roughly. 
 
 This acts in the same direction as the effect due to 
 the alteration in volume on solidification. Comparing this 
 expression with equation (238) we see that for pressures less 
 than about 9000 atmospheres the effect depending on the 
 change in volume is the more important, while for pressures 
 greater than this the effect we have, just been investigating 
 is the larger. If kv is greater than k'p then this effect in 
 the case of substances which contract when they solidify 
 is in the opposite direction to that which is proportional to 
 the first power of the pressure, so that in these cases the 
 effect of pressure upon the freezing point is reversed when 
 the pressure exceeds a critical value. 
 
 129. Effect of torsion upon the freezing point. 
 Let us suppose that we have a cylindrical bar of ice twisted 
 with a uniform twist about its axis ; it will possess energy 
 in virtue of the strain, but if it melts (suppose on the 
 outside) the water will be free from strain, and will not 
 therefore possess any energy corresponding to that possessed 
 by the twisted ice. Thus the potential energy will diminish, 
 and the Lagrangian function therefore increase as the ice 
 melts, so that by the principle stated in 84 the torsion 
 will facilitate the melting of the ice, that is, it will lower the 
 freezing point. 
 
 We can easily calculate the magnitude of this effect. 
 Let us take the case of a thin cylindrical tube of ice, since 
 in this case the strain is uniform, and let a and b be 
 respectively the external and internal radii of the tube, 
 
LIQUEFACTION. 26l 
 
 / its length, n the coefficient of rigidity of ice, <j> tn e 
 uniform twist produced by a force P acting at an arm , 
 then in the mean Lagrangian function of the tube there are 
 the terms 
 
 - - Itfn (a 4 - 0*) 
 4 
 
 where v is the volume of the ice. 
 
 So that if 80 be the rise in the freezing point produced 
 by the torsion we have 
 
 = i [Pbl- }*** (a' + If)] - J** 
 
 If the sides melt equally we have since a and b are 
 approximately equal 
 
 so that 
 
 20-X 
 
 since 
 
 dv _i 
 d^ IT' 
 
 To get some estimate of the magnitude of this effect let 
 us suppose that the cylinder is i centimetre in radius, and 
 that < is 1/40. Since Young's modulus for ice is 6 x io 10 , 
 n is probably about 2 -4 x io 10 , substituting these values we 
 
262 DYNAMICS. 
 
 find 
 
 80 i 
 
 -5- = approximately, 
 
 so that 80 = - -68 C. 
 
 So that in this case the ice on the surface would melt 
 unless the temperature was lower than - -68 C. 
 
 130. Effect of surface tension on the freezing 
 point. If a portion of a drop of water freezes, the form- 
 ation of the ice will cause a diminution in the surface of 
 separation of the water and air if the ice rises to the 
 surface of the drop, to balance this however we have two 
 fresh surfaces formed where the ice meets the water and air; 
 the diminution in the first surface would tend to promote 
 freezing, the formation of the other two would tend to pre- 
 vent it, but as we do not know the surface tension between 
 ice and water and between ice and air we cannot calculate 
 which of these tendencies would have the upper hand. 
 
 131. The effect of dissolved salt on the freezing 
 point. When a salt solution freezes the salt appears to 
 remain behind, and the ice from such a solution is identical 
 with that from pure water. Thus when a portion of a salt 
 solution freezes, the particles of salt are brought closer to- 
 gether, and work has therefore to be done upon them, the 
 Lagrangian function therefore diminishes, and we see by 
 equation (239) that the presence of the salt will tend to> 
 prevent the water from freezing. To calculate the magni- 
 tude of this effect, let be the mass of the salt, then using 
 the same notation as before, the mean Lagrangian function 
 for the salt if the solution is dilute is 
 
LIQUEFACTION. 263 
 
 where w 3 is the mean potential energy of unit mass of the 
 salt. When the mass of ice is increased by 8 the only 
 quantity which changes in the expression is if which dimin- 
 ishes by S//o. 
 
 Thus equation (239) becomes 
 
 W i (Oft /Q' 
 
 - - H 
 
 where 8 (Q'/p) and B/ a (6) are the changes in O'/p and f a (6) 
 due to the salt. If zzr be the pressure due to the molecules 
 of salt in the solution, 
 
 so that 
 
 If we suppose that the salt does not alter the properties 
 of the solvent we have 
 
 Let us first suppose that the solvent is water; if we 
 consider solutions whose strength is such that a number of 
 grammes equal to the formula weight is dissolved in one 
 litre of water, then w is about 22 atmospheres, or in absolute 
 measure about 2 2 x io 7 , X = 80 x 4 2 x io 7 , = 273, and 
 p is unity ; substituting these values we get 
 
 86 = -i-8C. 
 
 Raoult, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, v. in. p. 324, 1886, 
 found that solutions of this strength of many substances, 
 chiefly organic salts, froze at --1*9, but that the freezing 
 points of solutions of salts and acids were generally lower 
 than this ; he attributed the increased effect to the dis- 
 
264 DYNAMICS. 
 
 sociation of the molecules; it might however, as in the 
 analogous cases we considered before, be due to the altera- 
 tion of the properties of the solvent by the addition of the 
 salt. It would also take place if there were any chemical 
 action between the salt and solvent of such a nature that 
 heat is evolved when the solution is diluted. 
 
 When the solvent is acetic acid, X 44*34 x 4-2 x io 7 
 (Landholt and Bornstein Tabellen) p = i-o5 and $ = 290; 
 substituting these values we get for the lowering of the 
 freezing point of any solution of the same strength as before 
 
 In this case Raoult found 80 = 3*9. 
 
 When the solvent is benzine, A=29x4'2xio 7 , p = '9 
 and 0= 275, so that the lowering of the freezing point of a 
 solution of the same strength as before is 
 
 80= - 5-4 C. 
 
 Raoult found in this case that 80 was - 4*9 C. 
 
 Raoult found that the effect of dissolved salts on the 
 freezing points of acetic acid and benzine was much more 
 regular than their effect on the freezing point of water. 
 
CHAPTER XVII. 
 
 THE CONNEXION BETWEEN ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE 
 AND CHEMICAL CHANGE. 
 
 132. THE principle that when a system is in equilibrium 
 the Hamiltonian function is stationary can be applied to de- 
 termine the connexion between the electromotive force of a 
 battery and the nature of the chemical combination which 
 takes place when an electric current flows through it. 
 
 We shall begin by considering Grove's gas battery, as 
 this is the case where the chemical changes seem on the 
 whole to be the least complex. In this battery the two 
 electrodes are covered with finely divided platinum, the 
 upper half of one is surrounded by some gas, say hydrogen, 
 while the lower half dips into acidulated water ; the upper 
 half of the other electrode is surrounded by some other 
 gas, say oxygen, the lower half again dipping into acidu- 
 lated water. The two electrodes are well coated with 
 hydrogen and oxygen respectively. If the electrodes are 
 connected a current will flow through the battery and the 
 hydrogen and oxygen above the electrodes will gradually 
 disappear, while the water will increase during the passage 
 of the current. 
 
 To investigate the electromotive force of a battery of 
 this kind let us suppose that the electrodes have got into a 
 
266 DYNAMICS. 
 
 permanent condition, so that the gases attached to them are 
 not altered during the passage of the current, let us also 
 suppose that the electrodes are connected with the plates of 
 a condenser whose capacity is C, these plates being made 
 of the same material. Then if unit quantity of positive 
 electricity flows from the plate of the condenser which 
 is connected with the hydrogen electrode through the cell to 
 the other plate, by Faraday's Law an electrochemical equiva- 
 lent of hydrogen will appear at the electrode covered with 
 oxygen and one of oxygen at the electrode covered with 
 hydrogen; the hydrogen and the oxygen will combine and 
 the result of the passage of the unit of electricity will be that 
 an electrochemical equivalent of hydrogen and one of oxygen 
 will disappear and an electrochemical equivalent of water 
 will appear. The systems whose mean Lagrangian functions 
 change during this process are (i) the condenser, (2) the 
 hydrogen above one electrode, (3) the oxygen above the 
 other, and (4) the water. 
 
 Let Q be the quantity of positive electricity on the plate 
 of the condenser connected with the oxygen electrode, and 
 let , rj, be the masses of the hydrogen and oxygen above 
 the electrodes and of the acidulated water respectively. 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the condenser is 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the hydrogen is 
 where using the same notation as hitherto, 
 
 The mean Lagrangian function for the oxygen is 
 where 
 
 Za = *,0 log ^ 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 267 
 
 and for the acidulated water Z W where 
 
 Now .when unit of electricity passes from the one plate to 
 the other of the condenser, the electrochemical equivalent 
 of hydrogen is carried to the oxygen and there combines with 
 it at one electrode, while the electrochemical equivalent of 
 oxygen is carried to and combines with the hydrogen at the 
 other electrode. Thus if c l and <= 2 are the electrochemical 
 equivalents of hydrogen and oxygen, the net result of 
 the process is that Q has increased by unity, and t] 
 diminished by e 1 and e 2 respectively, while has increased 
 by (ej + 2 ). Hence by the principle that the Hamiltonian 
 function is stationary when there is equilibrium we must 
 have 
 
 but Q/C is the amount by which the potential of the plate 
 connected to the oxygen electrode exceeds that of the one 
 connected to the hydrogen electrode, in other words it is 
 the electromotive force of the battery, which we shall call /, 
 hence 
 
 If LW> be the mean Lagrangian function of unit mass of 
 aqueous vapour above the acidulated water and in equilibrium 
 with it, we have by 83 
 
 where is the mass of the aqueous vapour, and 
 
 Z W ^ 8 01og^Va'W-<. 
 
 Substituting these values in (240) we get 
 
268 DYNAMICS. 
 
 = t&O log ^ + t 2 X 2 log^ - (c, + c,) ^ log 
 { l ^ + V? 2 - (c, + c 
 
 But 
 and by (83) 
 
 - 
 
 is of the form 
 
 Lastly e^/j + e 2 o/ 2 - (, + 2 ) w^ 
 
 is the loss of potential energy which occurs when an electro- 
 
 chemical equivalent of hydrogen combines with one of 
 
 oxygen and may be measured by the quantity of heat 
 
 developed by the combination of an electrochemical equiva- 
 
 lent of hydrogen at the zero of absolute temperature; we 
 
 shall denote it by e^, making these substitutions we see 
 
 /= ^0 lOg ^ + ^0 + ^0 lOg +,?... (241)^ 
 
 /> 
 
 where A - A' + e l J? 1 log -^, 
 
 PoPo" 
 
 hence we have 0* - - 6 -^ +p = t.q ............. (242). 
 
 u-u au 
 
 Thus if we know the way in which/ depends upon 6 we can 
 determine g, so that by measurements of the electromotive 
 force of a cell and the variations of this force with the tem- 
 perature we can calculate the mechanical equivalent of the 
 heat developed in the combination which takes place in the 
 cell. 
 
 133. Equations (241) and (242) are not confined to the 
 case of the Gas Battery. We can prove in a similar way that 
 if p is the electromotive force of any battery where the 
 solutions used are dilute, then 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 269 
 
 where e l is the electrochemical equivalent of hydrogen, } 
 the value of jR for this gas, /o 1? /o 2 ... the masses in unit volume 
 of those substances which disappear as the chemical action 
 which produces the current goes on, while o^, o- 2 ... are 
 the masses in unit volume of those which appear, a, b, ...c, d, ... 
 are the ratios of the electrochemical equivalents of the sub- 
 stances to that of hydrogen, divided by the molecular weight 
 of the substance, f.q is the mechanical equivalent of the 
 heat which would be evolved at the absolute zero of tempera- 
 ture by the chemical action which takes place when unit of 
 electricity passes through the cell. 
 
 From this equation we get as before 
 
 *-+'-* ............... (*> 
 
 By v. Helmholtz's principle (48) OdpjdB is the heat 
 which must be supplied to the cell in order to keep the 
 temperature constant when the unit of electricity passes 
 through the cell, or in other words BdpjdO is the mechanical 
 equivalent of the heat which is "reversibly generated when 
 unit of electricity passes through the cell. Now/ the work 
 done in driving this quantity of electricity through the cell 
 plus OdpfdO the heat reversibly generated must be equal to 
 fw the heat equivalent of the chemical action which takes 
 place in the cell, hence by (243) we have 
 
 2 
 
 Now W and tq are the mechanical equivalents of the 
 heat developed by the same combination when it takes place 
 at the temperatures and absolute zero respectively, and 
 the difference between these quantities must be the differ- 
 ence between the mechanical equivalents of the quantities of 
 heat required to raise them from zero to 6 degrees in their 
 
2/0 DYNAMICS. 
 
 combined and uncombined states. If we consider the 
 case when two gases A and B combine to form two others 
 C and D y then if c lt c z , c# <r 4 are the mechanical equivalents 
 of the specific heats at constant volume of these gases, 
 15 c 2 , 3 , 4 their electrochemical equivalents, if we start 
 with A and B at zero and raise them to degrees and then 
 let them combine, we shall spend (e^ + 6 2 c 2 ) 6 units of work 
 in raising the temperature and gain ew by their combination, 
 so that the net result in our favour will be 
 
 W-(^ + vv)0. 
 
 If we let them combine at zero temperature and then 
 raised them to we should gain tq and spend (e 3 ^ 3 + e/ 4 ) 
 units of work, hence since the balance of work in our favour 
 must be the same in both cases, we have 
 
 ? ~ ( V 3 + / 4 ) = ew - (c^, 
 and therefore by (245) 
 
 But by (241) 
 
 so that B = / 3 + e/ 4 - e^ - / 2 ............ (246). 
 
 If the combination is attended by the production of an 
 amount of heat comparable with that which occurs when 
 hydrogen and oxygen combine, then 6 2 d 2 fl/d6 2 , which is com- 
 parable with the heat required to raise the temperature of 
 the substances degrees and is therefore at the most a few 
 hundred calories per gramme of substance, will be small 
 compared with q, which is measured by thousands of calories, 
 so that when the combination is attended by the evolution 
 of a large quantity of heat we may at ordinary temperature 
 neglect 6*d*pld6 2 and write 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 
 
 Since by Dulong's and Petit's law c lt c^ c^ c 4 are in- 
 versely proportional to the combining weights of the gases 
 A, I>, C, D, we see that whenever the combination leaves 
 the number of molecules unaltered B will vanish and the 
 equation 
 
 will be rigorously true. We see by this equation that when 
 the electromotive force increases as the temperature in- 
 creases the electromotive force is greater, while when the 
 electromotive force diminishes as the temperature increases 
 it is less than that calculated from the formula p = c^, which 
 is often employed. 
 
 If k be the coefficient of the chemical combination (115) 
 which goes on in the cell, i.e. the value of 
 
 when the densities of the gases or solutions have the values 
 they possess when in chemical equilibrium with each other, 
 then since any small change cannot alter the value of the 
 mean Lagrangian function of the gases or dilute solutions 
 when in equilibrium, we get if we suppose the change is that 
 which would take place if unit of electricity were to pass 
 through the solutions 
 
 o = e l R,P\Qgk + AO + 0\o%0 + cq ...... (247); 
 
 combining this with (245) we get 
 
 or l og = l og ............ (248) . 
 
2/2 DYNAMICS. 
 
 This equation affords a very easy method of finding the 
 coefficient of any chemical combination if we can make a 
 cell in which this combination takes place, for then if we 
 measure the electromotive force and the densities of the 
 solutions, equation (247) will at once give k. Thus the 
 Daniell's cell enables us to calculate the coefficient of the 
 combination 
 
 Zn + H 2 SO 4 + CuSO 4 = ZnSO 4 + H 2 SO 4 + Cu. 
 
 Here if p and o- are the masses per unit volume of the 
 CuSO 4 and ZnSO 4 respectively when there is chemical 
 equilibrium 
 
 so that if p' and o-' are the densities .of the CuSO 4 and the 
 ZnSO 4 when the electromotive force is p we have 
 
 Now at o C. t^Rfi is nearly io 6 and/ is about io 8 so that 
 log k = ^ log - 100, 
 
 or approximately since for ordinary strengths of solution 
 log/// "' is small compared with 100 
 
 log e - = -200, 
 
 hence we see that in this case when there is equilibrium 
 practically all the sulphuric acid goes to the zinc. 
 
 If we determined the electromotive force of a battery 
 when lead wire dipped respectively into acid solutions of 
 lead nitrate and lead chloride, we should be able by equation 
 (247) to determine the coefficient of the action 
 
 2 HC1 + Pb(NO d ) 2 = 2HNO 3 + Pb C1 2 , 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 273 
 
 and so determine the way in which lead divides itself 
 between hydrochloric and nitric acids. 
 
 If we return now to the hydrogen and oxygen gas 
 battery, equation (247) is for this case 
 
 (249). 
 
 We can easily deduce from this equation the way in 
 which the electromotive force of a gas battery depends 
 upon the pressure of the gases in the vessels above the 
 electrodes. If p l is the electromotive force of the battery 
 when the densities of the hydrogen and oxygen are p, p 
 respectively, / 2 the electromotive force when the densities 
 are a- and <r', then we have by (249) 
 
 If the densities of the oxygen and hydrogen were 
 diminished one thousand times then at the temperature 
 o C. since e = io~ 
 
 JT3 f\ ------ .~ oe -- 
 
 ~i'i4xio 7 approximately, 
 
 so that the electromotive force is diminished by rather less 
 than the ninth of a volt. By making the densities of the 
 gases above the electrodes sufficiently small we could 
 reverse the electromotive force, though in the case when 
 the gases are oxygen and hydrogen the rarefaction required 
 would be more than could practically be obtained. 
 
 The diminution in the electromotive force caused by 
 rarefaction does not however depend upon the magnitude 
 of the electromotive force of the battery, so that in the case 
 
 T. D. 18 
 
274 DYNAMICS. 
 
 of gas batteries with small electromotive forces this reversal 
 might be practicable. 
 
 The condensation which accompanies the combination 
 of oxygen and hydrogen diminishes the effect of rarefaction ; 
 if the combination were to take place without condensation, 
 the diminution in the electromotive force caused by 
 diminishing the density one thousand times would be about 
 one-seventh of a volt. 
 
 We see too from equation (249) that the electromotive 
 force in all cases tends to produce a current the chemical 
 action of which would make the densities of the gases 
 or dilute solutions approach the values they have when in 
 chemical equilibrium with each other. When they have 
 these values the electromotive force of the battery is zero, 
 and the electromotive force is in one direction or the oppo- 
 site according as there is more or less of some substance 
 present than there would be if the mixture of gases or dilute 
 solutions were in chemical equilibrium. 
 
 Experiments on the electromotive force of gas batteries 
 charged with various gases have been made by Pierce 
 (Wiedemands Annalen, vui. p. 98). The following table 
 taken from his paper gives the electromotive force of a large 
 number of batteries at 15 C. and of a few at 75 80 C. 
 
 It will be seen from this table that the effect of an 
 increase in temperature on the electromotive force of gas 
 batteries is very variable, for of the five batteries whose 
 electromotive forces were determined at different tempera- 
 tures, the, electromotive forces of three were less and of two 
 greater at the high temperature than the low. 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 
 
 275 
 
 ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE AT i8C. 
 
 Gases. 
 
 Fluid between the 
 electrodes. 
 
 Ratio of elec- 
 tromotive 
 force to that 
 of a Daniell. 
 
 Gases. 
 
 Fluid. 
 
 Electro- 
 motive 
 force. 
 
 HandO 
 
 water 
 
 874 
 
 I and Br 
 
 water 
 
 '335 
 
 H and N 2 O 
 
 water 
 
 790 
 
 H and Br 
 
 NaBr + water 
 
 I'252 
 
 H and CO 2 
 
 water 
 
 9 8l 
 
 H and Br 
 
 KBr + water 
 
 i' 2 53 
 
 H and NO 
 
 water 
 
 '933 
 
 O and Br 
 
 KBr + water 
 
 '5 
 
 H and air 
 
 water 
 
 80 7 
 
 O and I 
 
 KI + water 
 
 057 
 
 H and H 2 O 
 
 water 
 
 807 
 
 Hand I 
 
 KI + water 
 
 86 r 
 
 H and CO 
 
 water 
 
 404 
 
 H and NO 
 
 HC1 + water 
 
 765 
 
 HandO 
 
 H 2 SO 4 + water 
 
 926 
 
 HandO 
 
 HC1 + water 
 
 855 
 
 H and CO 2 
 
 H 2 SO 4 + water 
 
 892 
 
 H and Cl 
 
 HC1 + water 
 
 I'/ 
 
 H and NO 
 
 H 2 SO 4 + water 
 
 768 
 
 H and Cl 
 
 KC1 + water 
 
 i'39 
 
 H and O 
 
 Na 2 SO 4 + water 
 
 698 
 
 H and Cl 
 
 NaCl + water 
 
 i '39 
 
 H and O 
 
 K 2 SO 4 + water 
 
 698 
 
 H andO 
 
 NaCl + water 
 
 766 
 
 HandO 
 
 ZnSO 4 + water 
 
 771 
 
 H and CO 2 
 
 NaCl + water 
 
 8 4 6 
 
 H and CO 2 
 
 ZnSO 4 + water 
 
 820 
 
 H and NO 
 
 NaCl + water 
 
 750 
 
 H and NO 
 
 ZnSO 4 + water 
 
 860 
 
 
 
 
 H and O 
 H and NO 
 H and CO 2 
 
 ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE AT 7 5C-8oC. 
 
 water '828 I H and N 2 O i water 
 
 water '945 I H and H 2 O water 
 
 water '875 
 
 780 
 "954 
 
 The electromotive force of the hydrogen and oxygen gas 
 battery where iq = 3*4 x 4-2 x io 7 is less than that given by 
 the formula (246) even when the variation of the electro- 
 motive force with temperature is taken into account. This 
 seems most probably to arise from the arrangements being 
 such that the complete combination of the hydrogen and 
 oxygen contemplated in the preceding theory would not 
 take place, for we see from the table that the substitution 
 of acidulated water for water between the terminals increases 
 the electromotive force, this change favours the production 
 of ozone instead of oxygen when the current passes and so 
 increases the chance of complete combination. 
 
 1 8 2 
 
2/6 DYNAMICS. 
 
 In the case of the hydrogen and chlorine battery with a 
 solution of hydrochloric acid between the electrodes, q in 
 formula (244) will be the heat in mechanical units given 
 out in the combination of one gramme of hydrogen with 
 chlorine plus the heat given out when 36-5 grammes of 
 hydrochloric acid are dissolved in a large quantity of water. 
 
 The gas battery will work even if we have the same 
 gas (say hydrogen) above the electrodes provided it is at 
 different pressures. In this case on closing the circuit there 
 will be no change in the volume of the liquid between the 
 terminals, but when the unit of electricity passes through the 
 battery an electrochemical equivalent of hydrogen will be 
 transferred from the vessel where the pressure is high to 
 the one where it is low. The electromotive force in this 
 case is easily seen to be 
 
 6,^0 log p/cr, 
 
 where p and or are the densities of the hydrogen (or oxygen) 
 in the two vessels, at o C. this equals 
 
 i o 6 log p/cr approximately, 
 
 so that if the density in one vessel is e times that in the 
 other the electromotive force will be one-hundredth of a 
 volt. 
 
 In fact when we have any arrangement in which the 
 passage of an electric current in a certain direction increases 
 the Lagrangian function of the system, there will be an 
 electromotive force tending to produce a current in this 
 direction and equal to the increase in the mean Lagrangian 
 function produced by the passage of unit of electricity. 
 
 134. We can sometimes transform equation (244) by 
 means of the following considerations. If we have a mixture 
 of chemical reagents in various proportions we can in many 
 cases though not in all find a temperature at which they 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 277 
 
 would be in equilibrium if mixed in these proportions. Let 
 us suppose that it is possible to find a temperature at 
 which the reagents constituting the battery would be in 
 equilibrium in the proportion in which they exist in the 
 battery at the temperature 6. 
 Then by (243) 
 
 and by (246) 
 
 a b 
 
 Subtracting these equations we get 
 
 (250)- 
 
 If a considerable quantity of heat is given out by the 
 combination which takes place when unit of electricity 
 passes through the cell, then at ordinary temperatures the 
 last term on the right-hand side of this equation will be 
 small compared with the first and we may write equation 
 (250) in the form 
 
 . .. 
 
 An equation identical in form with this is given by Professor 
 Willard Gibbs in a letter to the Electrolysis Committee of 
 the British Association (British Association Report, 1886, 
 p. 388). According to Prof. Gibbs is the highest 
 temperature at which the radicles can combine with evolu- 
 tion of heat, while according to our view it is the tempera- 
 ture at which the .chemical system forming the battery 
 would be in equilibrium, and as it is not always possible 
 to find such a temperature the formula is not of universal 
 application. We see that for all cells to which the formula 
 
2/8 DYNAMICS. 
 
 can be applied the temperature coefficient of the electro- 
 motive force must be negative, and therefore by v. Helm- 
 holtz's principle, the passage of the current through the cell 
 must be attended by the evolution of heat. When the 
 temperature exists it is given by the equation 
 
 = - approximately. 
 dO 
 
 We shall now investigate under what conditions it is 
 possible to find a temperature at which the system would 
 be in equilibrium. We shall consider the case of the 
 equilibrium of four substances (A), (B\ (C), (D). 
 
 If Pl , p 2 , <r v <r 2 are the densities of (A), (B), (C\ (D) 
 when there is equilibrium we have by equation (246) 
 
 o = e, j^fl log ^-^ + AO + BO log + tq. 
 
 Now if e e a , e# e^ are the electrochemical equivalents 
 and f lt <; 2 , <r 3 , <r 4 the specific heats at constant volume of the 
 substances (A\ (J3\ ( C), (D) respectively, then by equation 
 (246) 
 
 ^ = ' 
 
 so that 
 
 Now if M lt M 2 , M# M 4 are the molecular weights of the 
 substances 
 
ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE. 279 
 
 and for gases by Dulong and Petit's Law 
 
 ^ = M 2 c 2 = M./ 3 = M 4 c 4 = c say 
 
 p g 
 
 e^ is the heat given out when the quantity of (A) decomposed 
 by one unit of electricity combines with the equivalent 
 quantity of B. Let us first suppose that this quantity is 
 positive, and consider the following cases. 
 
 ist case. When a + b = c + d, i.e. when there is no change 
 in volume on combination. In this case as 6 increases from 
 zero to infinity pfpf/vfcrf ranges from zero to C, and there- 
 fore since it never exceeds C it is not always possible to find 
 a temperature which should be one of equilibrium for any 
 arbitrarily chosen set of values of p l9 p 2 , cr lt cr 2 . 
 
 2nd case. When a + b<c+d, i.e. when there is an in- 
 crease in volume after combination. In this case as 6 in- 
 creases from zero to infinity P 1 a p s *l<r 1 c <r a lt starts from zero then 
 reaches a maximum and decreases again to zero, so that 
 again as pfp*l<rfcr* never exceeds a certain maximum it is 
 not always possible to find a temperature which should be 
 one of equilibrium for any arbitrarily chosen set of values of 
 
 Pi P> V V 
 
 3rd case. When a + b > c + d, i.e. when there is a diminu- 
 tion in volume after combination. In this case as 6 increases 
 from zero to infinity p l a p a */cr ] c cr a rf also increases from zero to 
 infinity, so that in this case it is always possible to find 
 a temperature which should be one of equilibrium for any 
 arbitrarily chosen set of values of p lt p 2 , cr^ <r 2 . 
 
 We see too that when the combination is attended with an 
 absorption of heat it is in general only possible to find a tem- 
 perature which shall be one of equilibrium for any arbitrarily 
 
280 DYNAMICS. 
 
 chosen set of values of p lt p 2 , o^, a- 2 when the combination is 
 attended by an increase of volume. 
 
 Summing up the results of this investigation we see that 
 equation (250) can only in general be applied to cases 
 where the reaction producing heat is accompanied by a 
 diminution in volume. 
 
 In these cases where pfpf/o-fo-* has a maximum value 
 at a finite temperature the mixture of gases after passing 
 this temperature will be in an unstable state, for any 
 increase in the temperature will promote combination 
 and produce an evolution of heat which will increase the 
 temperature still further. 
 
CHAPTER XVIII. 
 
 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS. 
 
 135. WE have hitherto left out of consideration the 
 effect of such things as frictional and electrical resistances 
 which destroy the reversibility of any process in which they 
 play a part. If however we take the view that the properties 
 of matter in motion, as considered in abstract dynamics, are 
 sufficient to account for any physical phenomenon, then 
 irreversible processes must be capable of being explained as 
 the effect of changes all of which are reversible. 
 
 It would not be sufficient to explain these irreversible 
 effects by means of ordinary dynamical systems involving 
 friction, as friction itself ought, on this view, to be explained 
 by means of the action of frictionless systems. 
 
 But if every physical phenomenon can be explained by 
 means of frictionless dynamical systems each of which is 
 reversible, then it follows that if we could only control the 
 phenomenon in all its details, it would be reversible, so that 
 as was pointed out by Maxwell, the irreversibility of any 
 system is due to the limitation of our powers of manipulation. 
 The reason we can not reverse every process is because we 
 only possess the power of dealing with the molecules en masse 
 and not individually, while the reversal of some processes 
 
282 DYNAMICS. 
 
 would require the reversal of the motion of each individual 
 molecule. 
 
 We are not only unable to manipulate very minute 
 portions of matter, but we are also unable to separate events 
 which follow one another with great rapidity. The finite 
 time our sensations last causes any phenomenon which 
 consists of events following each other in rapid succession 
 to present a blurred appearance, so that what we perceive 
 at any moment is not what is happening at that moment, 
 but merely an average effect which may be quite unlike the 
 actual effect at any particular instant. In consequence of 
 the finiteness of the time taken by our senses to act, we are 
 incapable of separating two events which happen within a 
 very short interval of each other, just as the finiteness of the 
 wave length of light prevents us from seeing any separation 
 between two points which are very close together. Thus if 
 we observe any effect we cannot tell by our senses whether 
 it represents a steady state of things or a state which is 
 rapidly changing, and whose mean is what we actually 
 observe. We are therefore at liberty, if it is more convenient 
 for the purposes of explanation, to look upon any effect as 
 the average of a series of rapidly changing effects of a 
 different kind. 
 
 Let us now consider the case of a system whose motion 
 is such that in order to represent it frictional terms 
 proportional to the velocity have to be introduced, and let 
 us assume at first that the motion is represented at each 
 instant by the equations with these terms in, so that the 
 dynamical equations are not equations which are merely 
 true on the average. 
 
 It might appear at first sight as if we could explain the 
 frictional terms in the equations of motion as arising from 
 the connexion of subsidiary systems with the original system 
 
IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS. 283 
 
 just as in ii we explained the "positional" forces as 
 due to changes in the motion of a system connected with 
 the original system. Let us suppose for a moment that 
 this is possible. Then if T is the kinetic energy of the 
 original system, and T that of the subsidiary system whose 
 motion is to explain the frictional forces, we have, by 
 Lagrange's equations, 
 
 d dT dT ddT dT dV 
 
 -j-. -p- - -j -j. -=r- - -j- + -3 = external force of type x ; 
 
 dt dx dx dt dx dx dx tff^ 
 
 thus the term 
 
 CA\ 
 
 must be equal to the "frictional term" which is proportional 
 to x. For this to be the case, it is evident that T must 
 involve x. The momentum of the system is, however, 
 d(T+ T')/dx, and this momentum must be the same as 
 that given by the ordinary expression in Rigid Dynamics, 
 viz. dT\dx. If these two expressions are identical, dT'/dx 
 must vanish for all values of x, that is, T cannot involve x, 
 which is inconsistent with the condition necessary in order 
 that the motion of the subsidiary system should give rise 
 to the "frictional" terms. Hence we conclude that the 
 frictional terms cannot be explained by supposing that any 
 subsidiary system with a finite number of degrees of freedom 
 is in connexion with the original system. 
 
 If we investigate the case of a vibrating piston in con- 
 nexion with an unlimited volume of air, we shall find that 
 the waves starting from the piston dissipate its energy just 
 as if it were resisted by a frictional force proportional to its 
 velocity j this, however, is only the case when the medium 
 surrounding the piston is unlimited, when it is bounded 
 by fixed obstacles the waves originated by the piston get 
 
284 DYNAMICS. 
 
 reflected from the boundary, and thus the energy which 
 went from the piston to the air gets back again from the 
 air to the piston. Thus the frictional terms cannot be 
 explained by the dissipation of the energy by waves starting 
 from the system and propagated through a medium sur- 
 rounding it, for in this case it would be possible for energy 
 to flow from the subsidiary into the original system, while, 
 if the frictional terms are to be explained by a subsidiary 
 system in connexion with the original one, the connexion 
 must be such that energy can flow from the original into 
 the subsidiary system, but not from the subsidiary into the 
 original system. 
 
 Hence we conclude that the equations of motion, when 
 they contain frictional terms, represent the average motion 
 of the system, but not the motion at any particular instant. 
 
 Thus, to take an example, let us suppose that- we have a 
 body moving rapidly through a gas ; then, since the body 
 loses by its impacts with the molecules of a gas more 
 momentum than it gains from them, it will be constantly 
 losing momentum, and this might on the average be repre- 
 sented by the introduction of a term expressing a resistance 
 varying as some power of the velocity ; but the equations of 
 motion, with this term in, would not be true at any instant, 
 neither when the body was striking against a molecule of 
 the gas, nor when it was moving freely and not in collision 
 with any of the molecules. Again, if we take the resistance 
 to motion in a gas which arises from its own viscosity, the 
 kinetic theory of gases shows that the equations of motion 
 of the gas, with a term included expressing a resistance 
 proportional to the velocity, are not true at any particular 
 instant, but only when the average is taken over a time 
 which is large compared with the time a molecule takes to 
 traverse its own free path. 
 
IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS. 285 
 
 Since frictional forces cannot be explained by means of 
 a system in a uniform state, we shall consider the dynamics 
 of a system which is subject to the action of forces which 
 last only for a short time but which recur very frequently. 
 
 Let us suppose that in the expression for the Lagrangian 
 function of the system we are considering there is a term 
 L' which is intermittent. It has for some small time a 
 finite value, then vanishes, then springs into existence 
 again, then vanishes, and so on, repeating its value n times 
 in a second. We shall for brevity speak of each of the 
 epochs during which the function L' has a finite value as 
 a collision, and shall call n the number of collisions per 
 second. For example, in the case of a body moving through 
 a gas L' may be the part of the Lagrangian function which 
 represents the action of a molecule of the gas on the body, 
 when the body is in collision with a molecule L has a finite 
 value, when however the body is free from collision L' is so 
 small that it may be assumed to be zero without appreciable 
 error. 
 
 Lagrange's equation corresponding to the coordinate x 
 is, if L is the steady part of the Lagrangian function, 
 
 d dL dL d dL' dL' 
 
 Integrating this equation over a time T we get 
 dL dL> 
 
 Now unless the structure of the system is steadily chang- 
 ing \dL'ldx\* will either vanish or be exceedingly small, so 
 that in general we may neglect it and write 
 
 dL dL\ ( T dL' . 
 
 Tr~ -j- ) dt- I -j-dt 
 dt dx dx) J dx 
 
286 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Let us choose T so that though a great many collisions 
 occur in this time, yet the values of x, x, x are not 
 changed in it by a finite amount. 
 
 Now if T be the time a collision lasts and if there are n 
 of them per second 
 
 if as in a numerous class of cases x may be supposed to 
 remain constant during the collision, we may write (252) as 
 
 , 
 
 dx dx 
 
 where X 
 
 Since 
 
 Jo \dtdx dx) dt T \dtdx~ dx}* 
 
 equation (251) becomes 
 
 dtdx dx dx' 
 
 Thus the effect produced by these intermittent forces is 
 the same as that which would be produced by a steady 
 force X of type x and given by the equation 
 
 X=n dx' 
 
 Similarly they would produce the same effect as a force 
 Y of type y where 
 
 Y=n ~dy' 
 
 If dxldx, dxldy do not involve the velocities x, y and 
 if n the number of collisions per second is a linear function 
 
IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS. 287 
 
 of these velocities, these forces will be of the character of 
 frictional forces. 
 
 If n does not involve the coordinates x, y explicitly then 
 we have - 
 
 dY dX 
 
 the consequences of this equation will be similar to those 
 developed in 44. Thus for example suppose we were to 
 find that the logarithmic decrement of the torsional vibra- 
 tions of a wire depended on the extension of the wire, then 
 it would follow from (252) that when the wire was vibrating 
 there would be a force tending to alter its length. If the 
 frictional resistance to the torsional vibrations were /x0, 
 where is the angular velocity of a pointer attached to the 
 wire, then if the above equation is true, there would be a 
 force X tending to lengthen the wire and given by the 
 equation 
 
 - = - 6 -_- , where x is the length of the wire. 
 au ax 
 
 Thus if -~ is constant we have 
 dx 
 
 x=-ei>f. 
 
 dx 
 
 Whence it follows that if the torsional vibrations were 
 periodic there would be a force tending to produce longi- 
 tudinal vibrations of half their period ; or again, if the 
 viscosity of an iron wire were altered by magnetization 
 there would be a periodic magnetizing force acting on a 
 vibrating wire whose period would be half that of the 
 torsional vibrations. 
 
 The relation (253) is only satisfied when n is in- 
 dependent of x and y, if n is a function of these quantities 
 we shall have the relation 
 
288 DYNAMICS. 
 
 dY dX v d\o>gn 
 
 --- -j- = A j -- - 
 
 ax ay ay ax 
 
 instead, and if we consider forces of a third type z, the 
 two additional relations 
 
 d\ogn 
 
 _~ 
 
 dz dx dx dz 
 
 and dY_ dtegn d\ogn 
 
 .dllvl t " ' -* T ~ ' -* 
 
 dy dz dz dy 
 
 so that 
 
 7 (dY dX\ ^(dX dZ\ v (dZ dY\ 
 
 z(-_ j- }+y\~*-- j- ) + x (-j -j- )-o. ..(254). 
 
 \dx dy J \dz dx J \dy dz J 
 
 In these relations X, Y, Z are only those parts of the 
 forces of types x, y, z which are intermittent in their action. 
 
 If from the nature of the case we can see that the 
 number of collisions is independent of some one coordinate 
 x, then it follows from the above equations that 
 
 (i/dY dX\, [i/JZ dX\j 
 log n = l-=( j -- -=- ) dy + I -=, ( - ---- }dz. 
 ) X\dx dy J ' ] X\dx dz J 
 
 If the viscous forces arise from collisions with several 
 distinct systems, instead of with one as we have hitherto 
 assumed, we shall have 
 
 = 1 ,-... 
 
 dy * ay 
 
 where n lt n a are the numbers of collisions per second with 
 the systems (i), (2)... respectively, and 
 
 where Z/ is the Lagrangian function of the rth system. 
 
VISCOUS FORCES. 289 
 
 If ... are independent of x, y then as before 
 
 dX_dY 
 
 dy ~ doc ' 
 
 but if j, , involve the coordinates x, y, then the relation 
 (253) must be replaced by one involving higher differential 
 coefficients. 
 
 The preceding considerations show that in those cases 
 where the viscous forces are due to "collisions" we have 
 several criteria the fulfilment or non-fulfilment of which will 
 afford us information about the constitution of the system. 
 Thus if (252) is not fulfilled we conclude that the number 
 of collisions depends upon the value of the coordinates, if 
 (253) is not fulfilled we conclude that the viscous forces are 
 due to collisions with more systems than one and so on. 
 
 There is a great dearth of experiments on the influence 
 of various physical conditions on viscous forces except 
 when these forces are those which resist the passage of 
 electricity through conductors. It does not seem probable 
 however that in this case the resistance can be due to a suc- 
 cession of impulses whose number is proportional to the 
 strength of the current ; for the case is not analogous to 
 that of a viscous force depending on the change of shape 
 or configuration of a system, where we might reasonably 
 expect the number of effective collisions to be propor- 
 tional to the velocity of the change. 
 
 In order to get some idea as to how discontinuous 
 forces can produce the effect of electric resistance, let us 
 consider some cases in which effects analogous to resistance 
 are produced by a succession of changes following one 
 another in quick succession. A very good example of a 
 case of this kind is the arrangement given by Maxwell 
 (Electricity and Magnetism, n. p. 385) for measuring in 
 
 T. D. 19 
 
DYNAMICS. 
 
 electromagnetic measure the capacity of a condenser, in 
 which by means of a tuning fork interrupter the plates of a 
 condenser are alternately connected with the poles of a 
 battery and with each other. If the rate of discharge is 
 very rapid, this arrangement of condenser and tuning fork 
 produces the same effect as a resistance ijnC where C is 
 the capacity of the condenser and n the number of times it 
 is discharged per second. Thus in this case a combination 
 of induction and discharge produces the same effect as a 
 resistance. Another case in which the conditions are plainly 
 discontinuous but which produces the same effect as a 
 continuous current, if the rate of alternation is sufficiently 
 rapid, is when electricity passes through a closed glass tube 
 filled with air. If electrodes are fused into the tube and 
 connected to an electrical machine in action there will be 
 no discharge of electricity across the tube until the electro- 
 motive force gets large enough to break down the electric 
 strength of the air, when a spark will pass, an interval will 
 elapse before the second spark passes, during which the 
 electromotive force inside the tube will be increasing to the 
 value necessary to overcome the electric strength of the air. 
 If this interval is very short then the successive discharges 
 will produce the same effect as a continuous current through 
 the tube. The consideration of this case may also throw 
 some light on the mechanism by which the discharge is 
 effected, for there are many reasons for believing that in 
 this case the discharge is accomplished by the decomposi- 
 tion of the molecules of the gas, the energy required for 
 this decomposition coming from the electric field, and the 
 consequent exhaustion of the electric energy producing the 
 electric discharge. The reasons which lead us to this con- 
 clusion are as follows : 
 
 (i) Different gases differ much more in their electric 
 
ELECTRIC RESISTANCE. 2QI 
 
 strengths than they do in other physical qualities, the 
 difference is much more comparable with the differences 
 between their chemical properties than their physical ones, 
 and the difference between a chemical and a physical pro- 
 cess seems to be that in the chemical process the mole- 
 cules are split up while in the physical one they are not. 
 
 (2) In many cases there is direct evidence from both 
 spectroscopic and chemical analysis that this decomposition 
 takes place, and again gases of complex composition 
 whose molecules are easily split up are also electrically very 
 weak. 
 
 (3) We can explain by this hypothesis in a general way 
 (Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. v. 400) why the electric strength 
 should gradually diminish as the gas gets rarer and rarer, 
 until when the pressure is about that due to a millimetre 
 of mercury the electric strength is a minimum, when the 
 pressure falls below this value the electric strength increases 
 again until at the highest exhaustion which can be got by 
 the best modern air pumps the strength is so great that it 
 is almost impossible to get a spark through the gas. 
 
 (4) Dr Schuster has shown (Proc. Royal Society, xxxvu. 
 p. 318) that the electrical discharge through mercury vapour 
 which is supposed to be a monatomic gas presents a 
 peculiar appearance and passes with great difficulty, and 
 quite recently Hertz (Wied. Ann. xxxi. p. 983, 1887) has 
 shown that the electric discharge passes more easily through 
 a gas when it is exposed to the action of violet or ultra-violet 
 light than when it is in the dark ; since ultra-violet light has 
 a strong tendency to decompose the molecules of a gas 
 through which it is passing, this is very strong evidence in 
 favour of the view that the discharge is caused by the 
 splitting up of the molecules of the gas. 
 
 In the case of the electric discharge through gases the 
 
 192 
 
2Q2 DYNAMICS. 
 
 insulation seems to be perfect until the electromotive force 
 reaches a definite value, when a spark passes. Thus the field 
 can apparently not be discharged by a rearrangement of the 
 molecules unaccompanied by decomposition. There is evi- 
 dence however that when the molecules are split up into 
 constituents a state of molecular structure is produced in 
 which the discharge may be produced by rearrangement 
 without further decomposition. Thus Dr Schuster has shown 
 (Proc. Roy. Soc. XLII. p. 371) that when a strong electric dis- 
 charge passes through a gas, a very small electromotive force 
 is sufficient to produce a current in a region of the gas 
 screened off from the electrical influence of the primary dis- 
 charge. Again Hittorf found that a gas was weakened for 
 discharges in the horizontal direction by passing a vertical 
 discharge through it. The diminution in the electric strength 
 of a gas after the passage of a spark can be accounted for in 
 the same way. Again in Mr Varley's experiments on the 
 electric discharge through gases (Proc. Roy. Soc. xix. 236) 
 the quantity of electricity which passed through a tube filled 
 with gas was proportional to E - Q where E is the difference 
 between the potentials of the electrodes and a constant 
 electromotive force, in other words the quantity of electricity 
 which flowed through the tube was proportional to the excess 
 of the electromotive force above that which broke the dielec- 
 tric down ; this seems to indicate that the electromotive 
 force JS produces a supply of atoms in the nascent condi- 
 tion and that the rearrangement of these atoms discharges 
 the field. 
 
 In the case of fluid insulators the insulation for low 
 electromotive forces is not as in the case of gases perfect. 
 A condenser the plates of which are separated by a liquid 
 dielectric always leaks however small the difference between 
 the potentials of the plates may be. Some experiments 
 
ELECTRIC RESISTANCE. 2Q3 
 
 recently made by Mr Newall and myself (Proc. Roy. Soc. 
 XLII. p. 410) showed that for small electromotive forces the 
 leakage obeyed Ohm's law, that is, was proportional to the 
 difference of potential between the plates. This indicates 
 that the leakage is produced by the rearrangement under 
 the electromotive force of some molecular condition, and 
 that this condition is not produced by the electric field, for 
 if it were the leakage would vary as a higher power than the 
 first of the electromotive force. Quincke, who investigated 
 the passage of electricity through the same liquids, using 
 however electromotive forces comparable with those which 
 would produce sparks through the dielectric, found that under 
 these circumstances the quantity of electricity passing through 
 the dielectric varied as a higher power than the first of the 
 electromotive forces, which is just what we should have ex- 
 pected if the electric field split up the molecules of the fluid. 
 
 There are many liquids which, though they only conduct 
 electricity with great difficulty when pure, yet when salts or 
 other substances (which may themselves be non-conductors) 
 are dissolved in them, conduct readily. This kind of con- 
 duction is called electrolytic and is accompanied by effects 
 which are not observed in other cases. 
 
 Since the solvent is not a conductor, the discharge of 
 the electric field which constitutes conduction must in some 
 way or other be due to the action of the substance dissolved 
 in it. The consideration of the discharge through gases as 
 well as the chemical decomposition which always accom- 
 panies this kind of conduction suggests that in this case the 
 discharge is caused either by the splitting up of the mole- 
 cules of the salt by the electric field, or else by the 
 rearrangement when in a nascent condition of the atoms of 
 a molecule of the salt or the constituents of a more complex 
 molecule containing both salt and solvent, the splitting up of 
 
294 DYNAMICS. 
 
 the molecule being done independently of the electric field. 
 The first of these methods is unlikely for the following reasons. 
 
 (1) If it were true it would require a finite electro- 
 motive force to start a current through an electrolyte, just 
 as to send a spark through a gas, whilst from the evidence 
 of many experiments it seems clear that the smallest electro- 
 motive force is sufficient to start a current through an 
 electrolyte. 
 
 (2) The experiments of Prof. Fitzgerald and Mr Trouton 
 (Report of the British Association Committee on Electrolysis, 
 1886, p. 312) have shown that Ohm's Law is obeyed with 
 great exactness by a current flowing through an electrolyte, 
 whereas if the electromotive force had to break up the 
 molecules the current would be proportional to a higher 
 power than the first of the electromotive force. 
 
 (3) If the molecules were split up by the current then 
 the salt will form a greater number of individual systems 
 when the current is flowing than when it is not. Now the 
 rise of the solution in an osmometer and the lowering of its 
 vapour pressure depend upon the number of molecules in 
 unit volume of the liquid and not upon their kind, so that if 
 the number of separate systems is increased by the passage of 
 the current these effects ought to be increased by the passage 
 of a current through the solution. I have lately made some 
 experiments on both these effects and have not been able 
 to detect that the slightest change was made by the current. 
 
 For these reasons we conclude that the splitting up of 
 the molecules which allows the current to pass is not caused 
 by the electromotive force but takes place quite indepen- 
 dently of the electric field. 
 
 The forces between the atoms in a molecule are usually 
 too strong to allow of any arrangement under the electric 
 field, but when the molecule breaks up and these interatomic 
 
ELECTRIC RESISTANCE. 295 
 
 forces either vanish or become very small the constituents 
 of the molecule are free to move under the electro- 
 motive force, and they will move so as to diminish the 
 strength of the electric field. In order to form a definite 
 idea of the way in which the field gets discharged we 
 may take the usual view that the constituents into which 
 the molecule splits up are charged with opposite kinds 
 of electricity, and that when the molecule splits up the 
 positively charged constituent travels in one direction, the 
 negatively charged one in the other; in this way we get 
 two layers of positive and negative electricity formed, the 
 electric force due to which neutralizes in the region between 
 the layers the external electric force. The positively charged 
 molecules soon come into the neighbourhood of some 
 negatively charged ones travelling in the opposite direction 
 and they recombine, while the negatively charged ones 
 do the same with some positive molecules, thus the 
 force due to the layers vanishes and the external electric 
 field is re-established to be soon demolished again by the 
 decomposition and rearrangement of other molecules. 
 
 Although we suppose that the current is transmitted by 
 the molecules of the electrolyte breaking up, this does not 
 necessarily imply that the electrolyte should when free from 
 electromotive force be largely dissociated, for all that is 
 necessary on this view for the passage of a current is that 
 the molecules of the electrolyte should split up, and there is 
 nothing to prevent our supposing, if other reasons render it 
 probable, that they would instantly re-unite if no electromo- 
 tive force acted upon them. And since the state of dissoci- 
 ation depends upon the ratio of the time the atoms remain 
 dissociated to the time during which they are combined, we 
 may make this as small as we please and yet have continual 
 splitting up of the molecules. 
 
296 DYNAMICS. 
 
 There does not seem any necessity for supposing that 
 the passage of electricity through metals and alloys is 
 accomplished in a fundamentally different way from that 
 through gases and electrolytes. For the chief differences 
 between conduction through metals and through electrolytes 
 are (i) that in electrolytic conduction the components of 
 the electrolyte appear at the electrodes, and we have polar- 
 ization, and (2) that the conductivities of electrolytes in- 
 crease while those of metals diminish as the temperature 
 increases. 
 
 Let us begin by considering the first of these differences, 
 that of polarization. A little consideration will show that we 
 could hardly expect to detect it in the case of metals or 
 alloys, for here instead of, as in electrolytes, the property of 
 splitting up being confined to a few molecules sparsely scat- 
 tered through a non-conducting solvent, the whole of the 
 molecules can split up, thus the rate of disappearance of 
 any abnormal condition would be almost infinitely greater 
 than in the case of electrolytes, so that if any polarization 
 were produced it would probably die away before it could 
 be detected. Let us next consider the appearance of the 
 constituents of the conductor at the electrodes. The only 
 case in which we could expect to detect this is that of the 
 alloys, but even in this case Prof. Roberts-Austen was 
 unable to detect any change of composition in the alloy 
 round the electrodes ; we must remember however that an 
 alloy differs very materially from an electrolyte because 
 while in the latter we have a few "active" molecules 
 embedded in a non-conductor, in the former it is as if the 
 solvent as well as the salt conducted, so that the discharge 
 is not concentrated on a few molecules of definite com- 
 position but can travel by an almost infinite variety of 
 paths. 
 
ELECTRIC RESISTANCE. 2Q/ 
 
 Then again the statements about the effect of heat on 
 the conductivity of elements and electrolytes though true in 
 general are subject to exceptions, thus the conductivities of 
 selenium, phosphorus and carbon increase as the tempera- 
 ture increases ; that of bismuth is said to increase at certain 
 temperatures, and I have lately found that the conductivity 
 of an amalgam containing about 30 per cent, of zinc and 
 70 of mercury is greater at 80 C. than at 15 C. We must 
 remember too that the rate of increase of conductivity with 
 temperature for electrolytes diminishes as the concentration 
 increases. No sharp line of demarcation can therefore be 
 drawn between the two classes of conductors on this 
 account. 
 
 There does not seem any difference between metallic 
 and electrolytic conduction which could not be attributed 
 to the vastly greater number of molecules taking part in 
 metallic conduction, whilst assuming that in all cases the 
 current consists of a series of intermittent discharges caused 
 by the rearrangement of the constituents of molecular 
 systems. 
 
 We shall therefore proceed to examine the dynamical 
 results to which such a conception of the electric current 
 leads. 
 
 Let us consider the case of an electric field where the 
 electromotive force is everywhere parallel to the axis of x. 
 Let the electric displacement in this direction be /, then in 
 the Lagrangian function of unit volume of the medium there 
 is the term 
 
 where K is the specific inductive capacity of the medium. 
 
298 DYNAMICS. 
 
 This term gives rise to the force 
 
 _ 
 K 
 
 parallel to the axis of x. In consequence of the continual 
 rearrangement of the molecular systems//^ is not uniform 
 but keeps alternately vanishing and rising to a maximum 
 value. If these alterations are sufficiently rapid the effect 
 represented by this term will be the same as that of a steady 
 force equal to its mean value, that is to 
 
 K 
 
 Let us suppose that in consequence of the rearrange- 
 ment of molecular systems /vanishes n times a second, and 
 that T is the period which elapses between the end of one 
 period of extinction and the end of the next, then 
 
 where i is the maximum value of/, and ft a quantity which 
 depends upon the ratio of the time the field is destroyed to 
 that during which it exists. 
 
 When the molecular systems rearrange themselves so as 
 to discharge the electric field molecules charged with I 
 units of electricity pass through unit area in one direction, 
 while I units of negative electricity are carried by molecules 
 moving in the opposite direction. 
 
 Thus 2f is the sum of the positive electricity moving 
 in one direction and of the negative in the opposite passing 
 through unit area in unit time, it is therefore equal to u 
 where u is the intensity of the current, and since nr is 
 equal to unity, the force we are considering equals 
 
 nK 
 
ELECTRIC RESISTANCE. 299 
 
 so that this continual breaking down of the field produces 
 the same effect as if the substance possessed the specific 
 resistance zirfilnK. Thus the greater the number of times 
 per second the displacement breaks down &c., the better 
 the conductivity. 
 
 Now the breaking down of the displacement is caused 
 by the rearrangement of the molecules, and the rearrange- 
 ment of the molecules in a solid will produce much the 
 same effects as the collisions between the molecules of a 
 gas, and will tend to equalize the condition of the solid, 
 thus we might expect the rate of equalization of temperature 
 to increase with the number of molecular rearrangements. 
 The electrical conductivity would also increase in the same 
 way, so that this view fits in with the correspondence which 
 exists between the orders of the metals when arranged ac- 
 cording to thermal and to electrical conductivities. 
 
 The preceding investigation of the resistance of such a 
 medium is only valid when the electromotive force is ap- 
 proximately constant over a time which includes a great 
 many discharges. If the displacement were to be reversed 
 during the interval between two successive rearrangements 
 of the molecules the substance would behave like an insula- 
 tor and not like a conductor. If <r is the specific resistance 
 of the substance then 
 
 27T/3 
 
 *' 
 
 where all we know about ft is that it cannot be greater 
 than unity. To find a superior limit to n let us assume 
 that (3 has its maximum value, and that K is 7/9 x io 80 
 which is about the same as for light flint glass, then the 
 
300 
 
 DYNAMICS. 
 
 number of times the field breaks down a second is given 
 by the following table : 
 
 
 
 
 n 
 
 Silver 
 
 1-6 
 
 x io 3 
 
 5 
 
 xio 17 
 
 Copper 
 
 1-6 
 
 x io 3 
 
 5 
 
 x io 17 
 
 Gold 
 
 2'I 
 
 x io 3 
 
 4 
 
 x io 17 
 
 Platinum 
 
 9 
 
 x io 3 
 
 9 
 
 x io 16 
 
 Lead 
 
 2 
 
 x io 4 
 
 4 
 
 x io 16 
 
 Mercury 
 
 9-6 
 
 x io 4 
 
 8 
 
 x io 15 
 
 Water with 8-3 per cent, of 
 sulphuric acid 
 
 3'3 
 
 xio 9 
 
 2-4 
 
 x io 11 
 
 Copper sulphate and water 
 
 i'9 
 
 xio 10 
 
 4-2 
 
 x io 10 
 
 According to the electromagnetic theory of light the 
 electric displacements which constitute light are reversed 
 nearly io 15 times per second; comparing this with the 
 number of times the field is discharged in an electrolyte, we 
 see that the displacement would be reversed many times 
 a second before it was discharged and hence that such 
 substances would behave like insulators to these rapidly 
 alternating displacements, and so according to the electro- 
 magnetic theory of light should be transparent, which as a 
 matter of fact most of them are. Again, we have certainly 
 overestimated /? and probably underestimated K\ if we take 
 this into consideration we may conclude that the number 
 of times the field is discharged is probably even in the 
 best metallic conductors not much greater than the number 
 of times the displacements accompanying the propagation 
 
ELECTRIC RESISTANCE. 30 1 
 
 of light are reversed, hence we need not be surprised that 
 metals in thin films possess a transparency almost infinitely 
 greater than that calculated on the assumption that their 
 conductivity is the same as that for steady currents. 
 
 The number of times the field is discharged at any point 
 will depend upon the number of molecules which split up 
 in unit time and the distance which these travel before 
 combining. If m is the number of times the molecules 
 in unit volume split up in unit time and if it requires q 
 molecules per unit area to be split up in order to discharge 
 the field, then if the molecules after being split up travel 
 a distance x under the influence of the electromotive force 
 before again entering into combination, we shall have 
 
 m 
 =-*, 
 
 since any q molecules which break up within a distance x/2 
 on either side will discharge the field. Since both x and q 
 will be directly proportional to the electromotive force, 
 n will be independent of it, if the splitting up of the 
 molecules is accomplished by other means. 
 
 Since u zni = 2 xt, 
 
 q 
 
 and since, if the substance is an electrolyte, 
 
 where e is the charge on either of the ions into which the 
 molecule splits up, we have 
 
 U = 2mX. 
 
 So that if JV"bQ the number of molecules of the salt in 
 unit volume 
 
 u m 
 
3O2 DYNAMICS. 
 
 = x x (number of times each molecule breaks up per second) 
 = the distance between the two ions at the end of one 
 second. 
 
 But ujzNk is, see Lodge, Report on Electrolysis, British 
 Association Report, 1885, p. 755, the quantity called by 
 Kohlrausch the sum of the velocities of the ions, and if 
 we assume that the ratio of the velocities is given by 
 experiments on the migration of the ions, this view of the 
 current would lead to the same expression for the absolute 
 distance travelled by each ion in unit time as that given by 
 Kohlrausch. 
 
 A full discussion of this would however lead us too far 
 from our purpose, which is merely to use this conception of a 
 current to deduce reciprocal relations from the effects of 
 various physical agencies on resistance. 
 
 The specific resistance of a substance according to our 
 view is 
 
 27T/3 
 
 nK* 
 
 and if this varies when the circumstances are changed it 
 may be because either /?, n, or K are changed. To take 
 an example the resistance of a "metal wire seems to be 
 slightly affected by strain, this may arise either from the 
 specific inductive capacity being altered by strain, or by the 
 strain altering the number of times a second the molecules 
 split up, or finally by an alteration in the time the field 
 remains discharged. The term 
 
 K 
 
 in the Lagrangian function corresponds, see 35, to a force 
 equal to 
 
ELECTRIC RESISTANCE. 303 
 
 tending to produce an extension e. Thus unless the altera- 
 tion in the resistance was due to the alteration of K with 
 the strain there would be no corresponding elastic force. 
 If however it does arise from the alteration of K with the 
 strain the mean value of the elastic force is 
 
 and 
 
 r/'<lt = af' = a-, 
 
 JO % 
 
 where a is a number which cannot be greater than unity, 
 and which like (3 depends upon the time the field remains 
 discharged. 
 
 Thus the mean value of the elastic force 
 
 $n de ' 
 
 For good conductors this term will be exceedingly small 
 on account of the smallness of <r/, see the table p. 300, 
 and even for bad conductors it will never get large enough 
 to make it comparable with the large forces required to 
 produce an appreciable change. in the extension. 
 
 If # is a coordinate of any type this term indicates a 
 force of type x equal to 
 
 or as it may be written 
 
 27T/3 2 dX 
 
 Now .AT is of the order io~ 21 and vu, the electromotive 
 
304 DYNAMICS. 
 
 force, even for a fall of 10 volts per centimetre, is only io 9 , 
 so that in this case the force of type x is of the order 
 
 a dlogK 
 27T/? 2 dx ' 
 
 and so is exceedingly small ; hence we conclude that the 
 reciprocal effects corresponding to the effects observed on 
 the resistances are probably much too small to be capable 
 of detection unless for very bad conductors under the 
 influence of electromotive forces comparable with those 
 used in experiments on static electricity. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 Absolute temperature, 95 
 
 Absorbed air, effect of on vapour pressure, 173 
 
 Absorption of gases by liquids, 179 
 
 - Henry's Law of, 181 
 Action, Least, 14 
 
 Adie, membranes for osmometers, 186 
 Affinity, determination of coefficient of, by the observation of the 
 
 electromotive force of a galvanic cell, 271 
 Alloys, electric resistance of, 296 
 
 Battery, electromotive force of, 265 
 
 - Gas, 275 
 
 Baur, effect of temperature on magnetization, 105 
 Berthelot, Law of Maximum work, 220 
 Bertrand, vapour pressure, 161 
 Bevan. Young's modulus for ice, 259 
 
 Bidwell, effect of magnetization on the length of an iron bar, 54 
 Boltzmann, residual torsion, 130 
 
 on dissociation, 200 
 Bosscha, forms of clouds, 203 
 
 Bunsen, absorption of gases by liquids, 181 
 
 Capillarity, effect of, on electromotive force required to decompose an 
 electrolyte, 87 
 
 effect of, on vapour pressure, 162 163 
 
 - effect of, on solubility, 251 255 
 
 - effect of, on freezing point, 262 
 
 - effect of, on density of salt solutions, 191 192 
 
 effect of, on dissociation of gases, 203 
 
 - effect of, on chemical equilibrium, 234 237 
 
 Cassie, effect of temperature on specific inductive capacity, 65, 102 
 Chemical equilibrium, 215 
 
 - effect of pressure on, 221, 237 
 
 - effect of surface tension on, 234 237 
 
 - effect of magnetization on, 240 
 
 - effect of temperature on, 221 
 Chrystal, article on electricity quoted, 136 
 
 magnetism quoted, 61 
 
 Circularly polarized light, magnetic effects produced by, 78 
 Clausius, 143 
 
 expression for force between two moving electrified spheres, 36 
 
 formula for an imperfect gas, 197 
 
 T. D. 20 
 
306 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Coefficient of magnetization, effect of temperature on, 105 
 Coefficient of self induction, 40 
 Compressibility of salt solutions, 183 
 Constitution of bodies, Maxwell on, 133 134 
 Controllable coordinate defined, 94 
 Coordinates, definition of, 19 
 
 " kinosthenic," 9 
 
 " positional," 12 
 
 specification of, 20 
 
 " speed," 9 
 
 - " unconstrainable," 94 
 Critical value of magnetic force, 56 
 Currents, induction of, 41 
 
 mechanical force between, 40 
 
 effect of, on elasticity of wires, 43 
 
 Czapski, variation of electromotive force with temperature, 99 
 
 Dielectric, effect of moving conductors on stiffness of, 38 
 
 strain in due to electrification, 62 
 
 Diffusion of salts, 182 
 
 Discharge, electric, through gases, 291 
 
 through liquids, 293 
 Discharges, number of, in electric field, 300 
 Dissociation, 193 
 
 of nitrogen tetroxide, 200 
 
 of phosphorus pentachloride, 208 
 
 Boltzmann on, 200 
 
 Willard Gibbs on, 200 
 effect of electricity on, 207 
 
 effect of presence of neutral gas on, 207 
 
 effect of surface tension on, 204 
 
 effect of pressure on, 221 
 
 effect of temperature on, 201 
 
 of a solid into two gases, 210 
 
 of salts in solution, 212 
 
 Dissolved salt, effect on vapour pressure, 175 
 
 effect on freezing point, 262 
 
 Dupre, on vapour pressure, 161 
 Dynamical interpretation of temperature, 90 
 
 Elasticity of a wire, effect of current on, 43 
 
 Electric resistance, 289 
 
 Electric discharge through gases, 291 
 
 through liquids, 293 
 
 Electricity, inertia of, 32 
 
 specific heat of, 106 
 
 effect of, on vapour pressure, 164 167 
 
 effect on dissociation, 207 
 
 thermal effects produced by charge of, 1 10 1 1 2 
 
 Electrification, strain in a dielectric due to, 62 
 
 thermal effects due to change of, 102 
 
INDEX. 
 
 Electrolyte, effect of pressure on electromotive force required to decom- 
 pose, 8385 
 
 capillarity on electromotive force required to decom- 
 
 pose, 87 
 
 Electrolytic conduction, 293 
 Electromotive force due to variation of the magnetic field, 68 
 
 produced by twisting a magnetized wire, 7 1 
 
 required to decompose an electrolyte, effect of pres- 
 
 sure on, 84, 85, 87 
 
 required to decompose an electrolyte, effect of capil- 
 
 larity on, 87 
 
 produced by inequalities in temperature, 106 
 
 of batteries, 265 
 
 of gas batteries (table of), 275 
 
 Energy, "free, "95 
 Entropy, 157 
 Equilibrium, chemical, 215 
 
 "ect of strain on, 239 
 
 - effect of pressure on, 221, 238 
 
 effect of surface tension on, 234 237 
 
 - effect of magnetization on, 240 
 effect of temperature on, 221 
 
 v. Ettinghausen and Nernst, effect produced by flow of heat in a 
 
 magnetic field, 116 
 Evaporation, 158 
 
 effect of strain on, 168 
 
 effect of pressure on, 168 172 
 
 effect of surface tension OH, 162 
 
 effect of electrification on, 164 
 Ewing, effect of strain on magnetization, 55 
 
 critical value of magnetic force, 56 
 
 hysteresis, 104 
 
 Faraday, force on soft iron in magnetic field, 47 
 Fitzgerald, on Hall's phenomenon, 73 
 
 on Ohm's law in electrolytic conduction, 294 
 Force on a body in a magnetic field, 47 
 
 - a conductor carrying a current, 69 
 magnetic, due to currents, 68 
 
 electromotive, due to variation in magnetic field, 68 
 
 Free energy, 95 
 
 Freezing point, effect of pressure on, 257 259 
 
 effect of torsion on, 260 
 
 effect of surface tension on, 262 
 effect of dissolved salt on, 262 
 
 Gas, Lagrangian function for a perfect gas, 154 
 Gas batteries, 265 
 
 Pierce's determination of electromotive force of, 275 
 
 with one gas, 276 
 
 Gases, absorption of, by liquids, 1 79 
 
308 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Gases, electric discharge through, 291 
 Gibbs, Willard, on dissociation, 200 
 
 on the electromotive force of batteries, 277 
 
 Glazebrook, on Hall's phenomenon, 73 
 
 Groves gas batteries, 266 
 
 Guldberg and Waage, on chemical equilibrium, 225 
 
 Hall's phenomenon, 72 
 
 Hamilton, principle of varying action, 9 
 
 Height to which a salt solution rises in an osmometer, 188 
 
 v. Helmholtz, conservation of energy, 2 
 
 objection to Weber's law offeree between two electrified 
 
 spheres, 37 
 
 " freie energie," 95 
 
 variation of electromotive force with temperature, 99, 269 
 
 strain produced by a magnetic field, 52 
 
 Hertz, action of light on the electric discharge, 291 
 Hittorf, discharge of electricity through gases, 292 
 Hoff, van t', pressure in dilute solutions, 175 
 
 osmotic pressure, 188 
 
 effect of walls of vessel on chemical action inside, 206 
 Hopkinson, J. , residual charge of a Leyden jar, 136 
 Horstmann, chemical equilibrium, 229 
 Hysteresis, 104 
 
 Induction of electric currents, 41 
 Inertia of electricity, 32 
 
 magnetism, 65 
 
 Irreversible effects, 281 
 
 Jahn, variation of electromotive force with temperature, 99 
 Joule, elongation of a bar produced by magnetization, 54, 59 
 effect of magnetization on the volume of a magnet, 56 
 
 Kinosthenic coordinates defined, 9 
 
 Kirchhoff, strain produced by a magnetic field, 52, 54 
 
 Kohlrausch, electrolytic conduction, 302 
 
 Lagrangian function, expressions for, 23, 29 
 
 mean value of stationary, 145, 146, 147 
 
 expression of a gas, 152 
 
 . liquid or solid, 155 
 
 Larmor on varying action, 18 
 
 Law, second, of Thermodynamics, 99 
 
 Least action, 14 
 
 Leyden jar, residual charge of, 136 
 
 Liebreich, inert space in chemical reactions, 236 
 
 Light, magnetic force produced by, 78 
 
 Liquefaction, 255 
 
 Liquids, discharge of electricity through, 293 
 
 Liveing, effect of surface tension on chemical action, 237 
 
INDEX. 
 
 Lodge, Report on Electrolysis, 302 
 
 Magnetic field, stress produced by, 47 
 5, 68 
 
 force due to currents, 
 
 - produced by twisting a wire conveying a current, 72 
 
 - arising from the Hall effect, 74 
 produced by circularly polarized light, 78 
 
 inertia, 65 
 
 Magnetism, Ewing's researches on, 53, 54 
 
 Magnetization, terms in Lagrangian function depending on, 44 
 
 effect of torsion on, 61 
 
 due to torsion, 61 
 
 strains produced by, 50 58 
 
 change of length due to, 54 
 
 effect of strain on, 50 58 
 
 thermal effects due to, 103 
 
 effect on chemical action, 240 
 Mass, effects due to, in chemical equilibrium, 223 
 Maximum work, Berthelot's Law of, 220 
 
 Maxwell, Electricity and Magnetism, 41, 44, 45, 47, 49, 67, 289 
 
 Theory of Heat, 81, 90, 98, 164 
 strains produced by an electric field, 64 
 a magnetic field, 52 
 
 on the constitution of bodies, 133, 134 
 
 Mechanical force between circuits conveying currents, 40 
 
 Mercury vapour, electric discharge through, 291 
 
 Meyer, Lothar, Modernen Theorien der Chemie, 225 
 
 Meyer, Victor, effects of surface of vessel on dissociation, 207 
 
 Monckmann, effect of surface tension on the density of salt solutions, 
 
 192 
 Muir's Principles of Chemistry, 212, 225 
 
 Natanson, E. and L., dissociation of nitrogen tetroxide, 200 
 
 Neesen on residual torsion, 1 30 
 
 Nernst and v. Ettinghausen, electromotive forces due to flow of heat 
 
 in a magnetic field, 116 
 
 Neutral gas, effect of, on the dissociation of a solid into two gases, 212 
 Newall, discharge of electricity through liquids, 293 
 
 Ohm's Law for electrolytes, 294 
 Osmometer, 186 
 Osmosis, 1 86 
 
 Peltier effect, 115 
 
 Pfeffer on osmotic pressure, 175 
 
 Pfeffer's Osnwtische Untersuchtingen, 186 
 
 Phosphorus pentachloride, dissociation of, 208 
 
 Pierce, electromotive force of gas batteries, 275 
 
 Polarization, rotation of plane of, by magnetic field, 78 
 
 " Positional" coordinates, 12 
 
 Potential energy, 14 
 
310 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Pressure, effect of, on chemical equilibrium, 221, 237 
 solubility, 245 251 ^ 
 
 the electromotive force required to decompose an 
 
 electrolyte, 8485 
 
 of gas batteries, 273 
 
 the freezing point of liquids, 257 
 
 evaporation, 168 172 
 
 osmotic, 175, 188 
 
 Quincke, discharge of electricity through liquids, 293 
 strains in a dielectric due to electrification, 64 
 
 Rain drops, effect of pressure on the formation of, 172 
 Raoult, effect of dissolved salt on vapour pressure, 178 
 
 the freezing point of solutions, 175, 263 
 
 Rayleigh, Lord, coefficient of magnetization for small magnetic forces, 
 46 
 
 reciprocal relations, 81 
 
 Theory of Sound, 81 
 
 Reciprocal relations, 81 
 
 Residual charge of a Leyden jar, 136 
 
 Residual effects, 128 
 
 Resistance, electrical, 289 
 
 effect of strain on, 302 
 
 Reversible thermal effects due to a current of electricity, 109, 269 
 Riemann, law offeree between two moving electrified spheres, 37 
 Roberts- Austen, conduction through alloys, 296 
 Rontgen and Schneider on the compressibility of salt solutions, 83, 183 
 
 surface tension of salt solutions, 87, 254 
 
 Routh, Rigid Dynamics, 9 
 
 Stability of Motion, 10 
 
 Rowland, rotation of plane of polarization of light in a magnetic field, 79 
 
 Salt solutions, compressibility of, 83, 183 
 
 surface tension of, 87, 254 
 
 Salts, diffusion of, 182 
 
 dissociation of, in solutions, 212 
 
 effect of, on freezing point, 262 
 
 effect of pressure on the solubility of, 245 251 
 
 Schneider, see Rontgen and Schneider. 
 Schumann, compressibility of salt solutions, 183 
 Schuster, electric discharge through mercury vapour, 291 
 
 gases, 292 
 
 Second Law of Thermodynamics, 99 
 Self induction, coefficient of, 40 
 Solubility, effect of pressure on, 245 251 
 surface tension on, 251 255 
 
 of liquids in fine drops, 252 
 
 pores, 255 
 
 Solutions, compressibility of, 183 
 surface tension of, 190 
 
INDEX. 311 
 
 Solutions, dissociation of salts in, 212 
 
 Sorby, effect of pressure on solubility, 247 
 
 Specific heat of electricity, 106 
 
 Specific inductive capacity, effect of temperature on, 65, 102 
 
 strain on, 64 
 
 Spheres, force between two moving electrified spheres, 35 
 Steady state, 80 
 
 Strain in a dielectric due to electrification, 62 
 - effect on vapour pressure, 168 
 
 chemical equilibrium, 239 
 
 - freezing point, 259 
 
 solubility, 251 
 
 electric resistance, 302 
 
 change of temperature due to, 101 
 
 thermoelectric effects of, 113 
 
 Streintz, effect of current on elasticity of wire, 43 
 Stresses produced by magnetic field, 47 
 Surface tension of solutions, 190 
 
 Surface tension, effect of on the electromotive force required to decom- 
 pose an electrolyte, 87 
 - vapour pressure, 162, 163 
 
 solubility, 251255 
 dissociation of gases, 203 
 
 density of solutions, 191 
 
 freezing point of solutions, 262 
 chemical equilibrium, 234 237 
 
 Tait, Thomson and, Natural Philosophy, 18 
 Temperature, absolute, 95 
 
 effect on specific inductive capacity, 65, 102 
 
 electromotive force of batteries, 99 
 
 coefficient of magnetization, 105 
 
 chemical equilibrium, 221 
 dissociation, 201 
 
 change of, produced by strain, 101 
 
 Thermal effects due to change of electrification, 102 
 
 magnetization, 103 
 
 - change of strain, 101 
 
 reversible, due to a current of electricity, 109 
 
 produced by communicating a charge of electricity to a 
 
 body, no Ti2 
 
 Thermodynamics, Second Law of, 99 
 Thermoelectric effects of strain, 113 
 Thermoelectricity, 1 1 o 127 
 Thomsen, Thermochemische Untersuchungen, 227 
 Thomson, James, effect of pressure on the freezing point of water, 257 
 Thomson, Sir William, effect of strain on magnetization, 48, 52 
 - change of temperature due to strain, 101 
 
 - magnetization, 103 
 
 effect of surface tension on vapour pressure, 163 
 
 on the decay of torsional vibrations of wires, 139 
 
312 DYNAMICS. 
 
 Thomson, Sir William, effect of pressure on the freezing point of water, 
 
 257 
 
 thermoelectric effect due to inequalities of tem- 
 perature in a conductor, 106 
 Thomson and Tait, Natural Philosophy, 18 
 Tomlinson, effect of a current on the elasticity of wire, 43 
 Torsion, in a magnetized wire due to current, 70 
 
 produced by magnetization, 61 
 
 effect on magnetization, 61 
 
 effect on freezing point, 260 
 
 Torsional viscosity, 139, 287 
 
 Trouton, Ohm's Law in electrolytes, 294 
 
 Unconstrainable coordinate, defined, 94 
 
 Vapour pressure, 161 
 
 effect of surface tension on, 163, 164 
 
 effect of electrification on, 165, 166 
 
 effect of strain on, 168 
 
 effect of pressure on, 168 172 
 
 effect of absorbed air on, 173 
 
 effect of dissolved salt on, 175 
 Varley, discharge of electricity through gases, 292 
 Villari, effect of strain on magnetization, 48 52 
 Viscosity, torsional, 287 
 
 Waage and Guldberg, on chemical equilibrium, p. 225 
 Waals, van der, 90 
 
 formula for an imperfect gas, 197 
 
 surface tension of gases, 204 
 
 Weber's expression for the force between two electrified spheres in 
 motion, 36 
 
 v. Helmholtz's objection to, 37 
 
 Wiedemann, G. , connexion between torsion and magnetization, 61 
 torsion produced by a current flowing along a mag- 
 netized wire, 70, 72 
 Work, Berthelot's Law of Maximum, 220 
 
 CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY c. j. CLAY, M.A. AND SONS, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 
 
LOAN DEPT 
 
 LD 21A-60M.4 '64 
 (E4555slO)476B 
 
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY