OF THE OTIVEBSITY CALIFOK^ THE MINOR PROPHETS; WITH NOTES, CRITICAL, EXPLANATORY, AND PRACTICAL, DESIGNED FOR BOTH PASTORS AND PEOPLE. EEY. IIEXKY COWLES. " Understandest thou what thou readest ? And ho said, How can I, except some man should guide me ? "—Acts 8 : 30, 31. \ NEW YORK : D. APPLETON" AND COMPANY, 443 & 445 BROADWAY. 1867. fes / "w^^ of tlieir womb. Ephraim now appears under the figure of a fruit-bearing tree, smitten with death, dried up, to bear fruit no more. Then drop- nOSEA.— CHAP. X. 51 ping, or rather changing the figure, God declares that if they have children born to them, he Avill slay even their dearest and most loved offspring. So terrible are the curses that must come down on those who sin so persistently, and against so great light and so rich mercies. 17. My God will cast tliein avraj, because tliey did not hearken unto liim: and they shall be wanderers among the nations. "My God will reject them from being his people." "They shall be wanderers among the nations," with no settled habitation, no loved home — a prophecy eminently improbable when spoken, but eminently true for ages on ages. The ten tribes have long since lost all distinct nationality. Their posterity, if yet living, are wandering among the nations, unknown and of no account in his- tory. Even the Jews are often known simply as " wanderers." " The wandering Jew " is his style, both in common parlance and in more stately history. So signally are the words of prophecy fulfilled, and so terribly do the judgments of God scourge and deso- late those whom his great mercies fail to reclaim ! CHAPTEE X. The same general subject continues ; the sin of Ephraim and its just punishment, vs. 1-11 ; a call to repentance and a new life, V. 12; judgments still more near and dire, vs. 13-15. 1. Israel is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit unto himself : according to the multitude of his fruit he hath increased the altars ; according to the goodness of his land they have made goodly images. I paraphrase thus : " A vine pouring itself abroad, in luxurious growth, is Israel; he makes fruit for himself; according to the abundance of his fruit he has multiplied altars; according to the goodness of his land have they, the peoi)le, made good images." The word rendered " empty " does not appear anywhere in use in the intransitive sense of being empty, but does sometimes in the transitive sense of malcing empty. Its usual and primary sense is that of pouring out abroad. The course of thought forbids the sense of barren, fruitless, since the very point made is the abundant wealth of Israel, perverted tlie more to idolatry and sin. The more God gives them, the more they give to idols ; the richer their land and its jft*oducts, the richer shrines and altars go up for Baal. So sinful men cveryvfhere arc wont to pervert the eartldy gifts of God, till more gifts only make them more wicked and more un- grateful to the Giver ; and so more mercy in this line becomes only 52 nOSEA.— CHAP. X. ^ the greater curse, and sinners themselves compel their God to turn from blessings to retribution. 2. Tlieir heart is divided ; now shall thej be found faulty : he shall break down their alta-rs, he shall spoil their images. " Their heart is smooth," i. €., treacherous, deceitful, the verb here having this its primary sense. Among the various meanings of this word the idea of dividing is secondary and remote, grow- ing out of the use of smooth stones in casting the lot for the pur- pose of dividing between rival claimants. There seems to be no good reason here for departing from the primary sense of the word. "Now shall they be punished," not merely "found faulty." The verb means first to sin, and then naturally to suffer for sin, to bear punishment, as here. " ^e," who " shall break down their altars," &c., is God, named last in the closing verse of the previous chapter, but naturally present in thought in this connection. It is altogether legitimate that his judgments should fall on the idol altars and images, as here said. 3. For now they shall say, We have no king, because we feared not the Loed ; what then should a king do tons? The last clause should read — " As to the king, what shall he do f&r iis'i i. e.^ to help us. The time to which "this applies would naturally be in some of the seasons of anarchy when they had no king, and the tone is that of discouragement, tending to despair. Now they shall say, " We have no king, for we have not feared the Lord," and therefore this judgment of anarchy has come upon us ; what help now can we have from the king? 4. They have spoken words, swearing falsely in making a covenant : thus judgment springeth up as hemlock in the fuiTows of the field. *' They speak mere words " (unreliable), " swearing falsely, mak- ing covenants," in both of which their words go for nothing, and hence " the judgments of God spring up as the poisonous poppy in' the farrows of the field." This plant was peculiar for spreading rapidly, especially in a ploughed field, and for being injurious as a poison. In this view the point of the figure would be the rapidity with which the judgments of God on the people spring to light on every hand, and the fearful devastations and mischiefs they bring upon the land. Or possibly the sense may be — Justice as deter- mined among men, either publicly or privately, is perverted to be- come as the deadly poisonous poppy in the fui-rows of the field. This figure appears twice in Amos, viz., 5 : 7 and 6 : 12. " Ye who turn judgment to wormwood, and leave off righteousness in the earth." " Eor ye have turned judgment into gall " (the same nOSEA.— CHAP. X. 53 Hebrew words as in Hosea), " and tlie fruit of rigliteousness into hemlock." i^Tow since Amos prophesied somewhat eariier than Hosea, the latter may have taken up this figure from his brother prophet, changing it only as a mind of higher poetic culture and a more vivid imagination would naturally do. 5. The inliabitants of Samaria shall fear because of the calves of Beth-ayeii: for the people thereof shall rnourn over it, and the priests thereof that rejoiced on it, for the glory thereof, becanse it is departed from it. Beth-aven, house of idols (literally, of nothings, nonentities), is instead of Bethel, house of God, — the name being changed to indi- cate the fearful fact that the people had ceased to be a house of God, and had become a house of idols, after Jeroboam of Nebat set up his golden calf there. The sentiment of this verse is, that the people of Samaria should be put in fear because of these calves. So far from finding peace and help from their new gods, they should find only peril and alarm. " The people thereof " who " shall mourn over it " are the worshippers of these calves. The next clause should read — "And his priests" (those of the calf) "shall be thrilled with terror," or perhaps " shall leap as men fran- tic with terror, on account of them, because of his glory " (that of the calf), " for it is departed as into captivity." Sentiment — shame, confusion, and horror shall come on all the worshippers and priests of these calves, under the force of God's awful judgments on the land for this sin. 6. It shall be also carried imto Assyria, for a present to king Jareb : Ephraim shall receive shame, and Israel shall be ashamed of his own comisel. " It " (the calf) " shall be carried into Assyria for a present to the king that intervenes," i. e., who is called in to defend the kingdom against the Syrian power, but who, instead, becomes the conqueror and devastator of the ten tribes. See 5:13. Then Ephraim and Israel shall be confounded by the result of their own counsels. Their expected helper becomes their actual destroyer. Y. As for Samaria, her king is cut off as the foam upon the water. " As for Samaria, her king is cut off as chips on the face of the waters " — as if he were as insignificant as a floating chip, and as easily taken away and destroyed. The original word demands the sense chip, and not foam. 8. The high places also of Aven, the sin of Israel,, shall be destroyed : the thorn and the thistle shall come up on their altars ; and they shall say to the mountains, Cover us ; and to the hills, Fall on us. 54 HOSEA.— CHAP. X. " Aven " is here the Beth-aven of v. 5 — the locality of one of the golden calves — long time known as Bethel. See notes on 4 : 15. Its high places, on which idol altai's and temples stood, should be destroyed. " The sin of Israel," is said of the calf at Bethel, as being the occasion and manifestation of her sin of idolatry. The growth of thorns and thistles in places once so much frequented and so magnificent in works of art, gives a vivid sense of utter desolation. The doom of the people would be so terrible that they would choose death rather than life, and hence would cry to the mountains, "Cover us," and to the hills, "Fall on us!" — strong poetic conceptions, but terribly significant of their awful doom. 9. O Israel, thou liast sinned from the days of Gib- eah : there they stood : the battle in Gibeah against the children of iniquity did not overtake them. " More than in the days of Gibeah, hast thou sinned, Israel ; " — thy sins are greater than theirs; for which, see Judges, chap. 19- 21. Of course, her doom is more terrible. " There (in Gibeah) they stood ; " a remnant, even six hundred men, survived, from whom the tribe was again filled up. The battle in Gibeah against the children of iniquity (those wicked men) did not overtake and exterminate them. Ephraim need not expect to come ofi:* so well, for of her no remnant shall survive to replace the fallen and rebuild the kingdom. 10. It is in my desire that I should chastise them ; and the people shall be gathered against them, when they shall bind themselves in their two furrows. The received translation of the last clause scarcely gives an intelligible sense. The passage has vexed commentators the more because the reading of the original, both in its vowels and conso- nants, is in dispute. Omitting the details of this matter, suffice it to say that I prefer to read after the margin — sins not furrows, and hence to render the entire verse thus : — "It is in my purpose to chastise them, and the nations shall be gathered against them when they shall be bound for their two sins," — these sins having reference to the two golden calves at Bethel and at Dan. In the same sense, the " high places of Aven " are called " the sin of Israel " (v. 8). The idea is that, to chastise them, God will bind them fast because of these sins of calf-worship, and will then gather the nations (Syrians and Assyrians) together to fall upon them. So construed, the sense is vigorous, and entirely in accordance with both the significance of the several words and the grammatical construction. 11. And Ephraim is as an heifer that is taught, mid loveth to tread out the corn^ but I passed over upon her fair neck: I will make Ephraim to ride; Judah shall plough, and Jacob shall break his clods. nOSEA.— CHAP. X. 55 To understand tLis verse readily, we need to bear in mind that in the East, cows (heifers also) as well as oxen were put under the yoke and to the plough. They were also used for threshing, and under the Mosaic law — " Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that tread- eth out the corn " (Deut. 25 : 4), the latter may be supposed the more pleasant service. Threshing, moreover, was a common sym- bol for the exercise of oppressive power, or for the infliction of severe suffering. Hence I render — "Ephraim is a well-trained heifer, loving to thresh " (i, e., without a figure, to oppress), " but I passed along over the beauty of her neck " (never yet galled with a yoke) ; "I will yoke Ephraim ; Judah shall plough ; Jacob shall harrow." Some render — I will put a rider on Ephraim, i. «., for a driver. Our English version quite misses the sense in saying — "I will make Ephraim to ride," the idea being that he shall draw and icorh, not ride. These figures, taken from the occupations of ag- riculture, are significant and forcible. 12. Sow to yourselves in righteousness, reap in mercy ; break up your fallow ground : for it is time to seek tlie Lokd, till lie come and rain righteousness upon you. With this new figure before the mind, the prophet turns here to exhort both Israel and Judah to repentance and to works of righteousness. Here, us is very common in Hebrew, the second of two successive imperatives should be rendered in the future as a promise. " Sow for yourselves, for righteousness; thus shall ye reap according to your piety." The " reaping in mercy " must be promise, not command. " For righteousness " is the literal ren- dering, meaning, sow what will naturally produce the fruits of righteousness. The word rendered " mercy " must refer to man, not to God, and is therefore piety. The Hebrew phrase means — according to the measure of your piety. " Break up your fallow ground ; " make all due preparation for the harvest of blessings you need and should seek. " For it is time to seek Jehovah until he come and teach you righteousness." The verb rendered in our version to " rain " means to rain in a very few cases, to teach in a much larger number. In the conjugation used here it always means to teach, never to rain. And since in this latter half of the verse the figure is dropped, and the prophet says with- out a figure — "it is time to seek the Lord," it is more consonant with the strain of the clause to translate this word without a fig- ure, " teach," rather than with a figure, " rain." 13. Ye have ploughed wickedness, ye have reaped iniquity ; ye have eaten the fruit of lies : because thou didst trust in thy way, in the multitude of thy mighty men. Resuming the figures of husbandry, the prophet says — " Ye 66 HOSEA.— CHAP. X. Lave xjloughed wickedness," &c., in the same sense asj'anl (Gal.6 : 7), "Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap ; " or Solomon (Prov. 1 : 31), "They shall eat of the fruit of their own way,".&c. Ephraim liad trusted, not in the Lord, but in the way of her own choice, and in the multitude of her mighty men. The Lord is now about to show her the folly of such trust. 14. Therefore sliall a tnmiilt arise among tliy peo- ple, and all thy fortresses shall be spoiled, as Shalman spoiled Beth-arbel in the day of battle: the mother was dashed in pieces npon her children. "Tumult " is the panic-cry of men smitten with fear. "Shal- man " is abbreviated for Shalmaneser, king of Assyria (see 2 Kings 17 : 3), the same Avho conquered the kingdom of the ten tribes, besieged and took Samaria, and bore the people away into captivity. " Beth-Arbel " is probably Arbela of Galilee. The fearful judgments which have been spoken of repeatedly throughout chap- ters 4-10 culminate here. The time is just at hand, and the man- ner and form of the visitation are no longer couched in symbols, but are announced in the plainest speech. 15. So shall Bgth-el do unto you because of your great wickedness : in a morning shall the king of Israel utterly be cut off. Bethel, the centre and hence the symbol of calf-worship, is here used for the scourge sent of God to desolate the land. The senti- ment is tliat their sin at Bethel becomes their ruin. The king of Israel referred to here, I assume to be Hoshea, the last in the kingdom of the ten tribes, — especially because the whole tenor of chapters 7-14 implies that the destruction of the kingdom was very near, and because chap. 13 : 10, 11, implies that the king is already cutoff. "In a morning," is in the Hebrew — "in tlie morning ; " and therefore cannot wx'U mean that his being cut off should occur in the morning hour of some indefinite day ; but either in the next morning; or taken adverbially, very soon — as the Hebrews were Avont to signify the doing of a thing early by a verb formed from this same word, which means the morning dawn. There seems to be no objection, either grammatical or historical, to the sense — in the next morning — to-morrow morning; — for it is plain that this prophet continued to bear messages to the people after t\iQ last king, Hoshea, was cut off. The history (2 Kings 17 : 3-6) shows that this king was shut up and bound in prison, and thai*; after tliis^ the king of Assyria seized the whole country, besieged Samaria, and took it after a siege of three years. But this last king appears no more on the face of the history; — "he is utterly cut off." HOSEA.— CHAP. XL 57 OHAPTEE XI. The strain of rebuke and of forewarning of judgment Laving continued with only brief interruptions from the beginning of chapter 4, till we are brought almost to the very day in Avhich the king of Israel should be cut off, the course of thought now turns to reminiscences of love, and to the most touching expressions of pity and grief over the impending ruin of Israel. 1. When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son ont of Egypt. Thinking of the nation as having a lifetime, analogous to that of the individual, running through infancy and youth to manhood, the Lord says, '' "When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt," He had manifested a very special interest in the fathers of the nation, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob ; he had shown his care for their children during their oppressions under the Pharaohs. It was precisely by means of the call of God that Moses was trained, commissioned, and led on to become, under God, the deliverer of the people from Egyptian bondage. The citation of this passage by Matthew (2 : 14, 15), as being fulfilled in the case of the young child Jesus, called up from Egypt, raises the question, Does Ilosea in this passage refer in any sense to the Messiah ? The context decides this question in the negative. The enthe course of thought, both in what precedes and in what follows, relates to the nation of Israel. Hence Matthew must mean " fulfilled " only in the sense of an analogous event — an event which filled out the natural sense of the words " out of Egypt have I caUed my son." -The nation of Israel was God's child, and might be called his son. So was Jesus. God loved and cared for Israel ; so and more for the child' Jesus. God brought the former out of Egypt ; and the latter also. The same language, therefore, fitly describes each event, and the second becomes in a sort a fiJitl- ment of the icords which describe the first. It is not a case of the fulfilment of ])rox>liecy^ but only of the icords of a certain his- tory. The great value of the case lies in its moral bearings as illustrating the unchanging and oft-shown love and care of God for his sons. 2. As they called them, so they went from them : they sacrificed imto Baalim, and bm-ned incense to graven images. God's calling of his son Israel, especially by the agency of Moses, suggested his continued agencies of calhng the people by later prophets, and of this he proceeds to speak: "As they" — ^these later prophets — " called them, so they went away from their prcs- 58 HOSEA.— CHAP. XI. ence " — (so the HebreTv) : — the more the Lord's servants called, the more the people turned away ; "they sacrificed to Baalim," &c., as e. g. under Ahab and onward. Indeed, the worship of Baal appears as far hack as Num. 25 : 3, 5, and Judg. 2 : 1 1-1 3, and 6 : 25-32. The tense of the verbs " sacrifice " and " burn incense," implies not only that they Jiad^ but icould still — of set purpose and fixed habit. 3. I taught Ephraim also to go, taking tliem by tlielr arms ; but they knew not that I healed them. " Ephraim," here as elsewhere, must be the kingdom of the ten tribes. There was no nationality known as Ephraim till the revolt under Jeroboam. Hence the Lord speaks of his parental care of this new-born nation in its infancy. " I taught Ephraim to walk," as a little child is taught, supported and helped along — " taking them by the arms." But they did not recognize the Lord's hand in their healing and help. He does not imply that they could not know ; and does not say " they knew not " as lessening, but rather as increasing, their guilt. 4. I drew them with cords of a man, with bands of love : and I was to them as they that take off the yoke on their jaws, and I laid meat unto them. The description of God's tender care and gentle loving ways with his people continues. " I drew " (not drove) " them — with cords of a man," not cords of a bullock, untamed, headstrong, and wild. These cords are explained fully in the words " with bands of love," by the sweet attractions which manifested love naturally creates. The next figure also is taken from the ways of the kind husbandman : " I was to tliem as they that lift up the yoke which presses on their cheek ; " — for the rude yQkes of oriental countries are heavy and ill-adapted to the comfort of animals while eating. — The description continues: "I brought food to them and caused them to eat." The Hebrew has two verbs here, of which the literal sense is given in this translation. The tense of these verbs implies that God is willing still to feed them, as of old. This show- ing of God's loving care and gentleness toward his people is at once beautifal and strong. The facts of the case justify more even than this. 5. He shall not return into the land of Egypt, but the Assyrian shall be his king, because they refused to return. Ephraim as a nation is spoken of as one person. — He shall not be suffered to turn back to the Egypt of his fathers, though the people often manifested a strong desire to do so. God had another and a more fearful doom for them ; " the Assyi-ian shall be his king " Tlio reason— because the people refrv-o-l to return in peni- HOSEA.— CHAP. XL 59 teiico to God. Hosea is remarkable for liis play on the various senses of tlie same word — as here, between " returning to Egypt " in the first clause, and " refusing to return " in the second — the latter return being moral, — that of real repentance. Because they would not repent, the Lord put them under the Assyrian king which they abhorred, and forbade their returning to Egypt, which they sought. 6. And tlie sword sliall abide on his cities, and shall consume his branches, and devour them^ because of their own counsels. The word " abide " does not give the full force of the Hebrew, which means, to whirl, to be moved in a circle, brandished. Here, the sword is said to' be hurled down upon his cities — as if seen by the prophet, uplifted and waving high in the hand of the Almighty. Through the aid of progressive criticism, the word rendered "branch" obtains a modified and better sense. Primarily, the Hebrew word means impart of a thing; then a branch as being part of a tree ; then from branch, the word comes to mean poles and bars — the latter fastening the gates and becoming in a sort the strength and protection of a city ; and finally, by another change, it is used for princes and chieftains, considered as the strength of the city. So here, from the cities on which the sword falls, the prophet passes, not to " branches," for these have no natural connection with the city, but to the chiefs and rulers, and says of them — The sword shall consume and devour them, because of their vicious counsels in departing from God. This last circumstance forbids us to interpret the previous clause as being said of " branches." 7. And my people are bent to backsliding from me : though they called them to the Most High, none at all would exalt him. Though they are my people, yet despite of all my love and of all my discipline, they are " bent " — fully purposed, committed — to turning back and away from me. Though my prophets called them to return to the Most High, yet with one accord they " would not exalt him" — "exalt," in the sense of honoring him as the supreme God — to be adored instead of senseless idols. 8. How shall I give thee up, Ephraim ? how shall I deliver thee, Israel ? how shall I make thee as Admah ? how shall I set thee as Zeboim ? mine heart is tmmed within me, my repentings are kindled together. The sense of this verse is plain. The "giving up," is to hope- less ruin and desolation. So the parallel word — " deliver thee " — means to give over to the fell destroyer. " Admah and Zeboim " are associated with Sodom and Gomorrah as lying near in Gen. 14 : 8, and in Deut. 29: 23, as involved in the same terrible doom. " Mine heart is turned within me " — with feelings of pity, and grief, 60 HOSEA.— CHAP. XI. and tender compassion. "My repentings are kindled together,'^ implies that in this great conflict of emotions between the high demands of justice and the pleadings of compassion, his relentings were enkindled, and his very heart seemed to burn under the intense yearnings of sympathy. The reader will notice the strik- ing contrast between his people, "bent to backsliding" from him, and his own heart so tenderly lent to love and pity. How wonder- ful that the last words before this outburst of tenderness, and the last antecedent thoughts, are concerning the cruel waywardness and persistent rebellion of his people ! But no words of comment can heighten the beauty and force of this inimitable passage. The very heart of the God of love stands forth revealed in its glowing and expressive words. The general strain of the message, seiit of God by Hosea, had been of necessity stringent and stern with rebukes for sin, and oftentimes terrible in revelations of impending judgment — all right because absolutely necessary. Yet this strain, alone and exclusive, would not do full justice to the tenderness and the loving pity of Israel's God. These messages therefore cannot close without a most emphatic testimony to the loving-kindness of Jehovah. What do these testimonies concerning God prove ? (1.) That he has no pleasure in bringing ruin on even the guiltiest sinner. (2.) That he does not punish in the spirit of vindictive- ness. (3.) That he would always spare the sinner, and forbear to punish, or even chastise, if he could do so wisely and safely. (4.) That he takes supreme dehght in conferring good, and longs to bless all his sentient creatures. (5.) That it is only with the deepest grief that he ever brings pain and woe upon his creatures» (G.) Hence, that he will never punish any sinner beyond his real deserts — never beyond what the good of the universe imperatively demands. (7.) That no sinner, however severely punished, can ever blame God. (8.) That all sinners are bound to do justice to the divine love and pity, and should never impute to God feelings and motives which his own heart-utterances unmistakably preolude and forbid. (9.) Finally, that the character and government of such a God should command our unbounded and eternal confidence and love. 9. I will not execute the fierceness of mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim : for I am God, and not man ; tlie Holy One in the midst of thee : and I will not enter into the city. Speaking very much after the manner of men, God re23resents himself as having more " fierceness of anger " than he executes on the guilty. Often we need to make allowance for the necessity resting upon God, if he would be understood by men, of adopting their modes of expression, so as to speak of himself as men have reason to speak of themselves. In such cases, wo must qualify the HOSEA.— CHAP. XL Ql statements by reference to the known attributes of Jehovah. In the passage before us, we must not siii)pose that the anger of God had become unreasonably fierce, and that, becoming liimsclf aware of this, he resolved not to execute it in full. It is in accommodation to finite minds that he represents a conflict in his ovm between his indignation against sin and his pity for the sinner. Such represen- tations can scarcely mislead any except the captious and uncandid. In the phrase " I will not return to destroy," the first verb is used adverbially, the sense being — " I will not again destroy." The reason given — "for I am God and not man," reminds us of those beautiful words of Isaiah (55 : 8, 9): "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways, my ways, saith the Lord. For, as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." The last clause should read — not, " I will not enter into the city," but, " I will not come in wraths The former makes no pertinent sense in this connection. The latter is entirely admissible on the score of usage, and is perfectly in harmony with the scope of the passage. 10. They shall walk after the Lord : he shall roar like a lion : when he shall roar, then the children shall tremble from the west. 11. They shall tremble as a bird ont of Egypt, and as a dove out of the land of Assyria : and I will place them in their houses, saith the Loed. Better things are here. The people, once more, " follow after the Lord " — a phrase which alwjiys means true obedience. The •Lord is compared to the lion and his voice to the hon's roar with reference to those fearful, awe-inspiring agencies of God in provi- dence which startle and convulse the nations. It was such agencies that overwhelmed the old Assyi'ian and Chaldean empires, and raised up Cyrus of Persia to befriend the restoration of God's people. "The children" here must be the people of God. They "tremble " — i. e., come with trembling "from the west," as not un- affected with awe under the majestic presence of Jehovah. Yet they come with ease and rapidity, as is indicated by the flight of the sparrow and the dove. They come from every quarter — from Egypt on the south ; Assyria on the north and east ; and the west is specially named. Only for the sake of the idea of universahty could we expect the v/est to be mentioned, since there lay the sea. God will place them in their habitations, for dwelling again in peace and security. These verses give promise of a successful result, to some extent, and at some time, to the compassionate labors of the God of Israel to reclaim and restore his people. 12. Ephraim corapasseth me about with lies, and the house of Israel with deceit : but Judah yet ruleth with God, and is faithful with the saints. 62 ' HOSEA.— CHAP. xri. The Hebrew attaches this verse to the next chapter. In the course of thouglit it belongs there, and not at the close of this, since it reverts again to the perverseness, treacherj, and hypocrisy of Ephraim and Israel ; and when justly understood, makes Judah only less treacherous and apostate. What is said here of Ephraim and Israel is plain ; the last clause which respects Judah has been interpreted variously. The sense turns primarily on the Hebrew word rendered "ruleth." * The translators of our version derived it from another root, which means to tread down, and then to bear rule. But the sense above given is far more in harmony with the preceding context, and also with 12 : a, which indeed quite forbids our taking this passage in a good sense. The best modern critics derive this verb from a root which means, to run wildly and at large, as animals that, after lopg restraint, have broken loose. So Judah has broken away from the Lord's yoke and runs wanton at her will. The same word occurs (Jer. 2 : 31), " Wherefor say my people — We are lords ; we will come no more unto thee." We are lords, gives the idea ; we have broken loose from all authority and restraint. The entire last clause may be translated — "But Judah runs loose and wild as to God and as to the holy and faith- ful one" — where God's purity and faithfulness are put in contrast with the infidehty and moral pollution of Judah. The word for " holy " is indeed in the plural here. So are some of the names of God. The marginal reading properly gives it, " the most Holy." CHAPTER XII. In this chapter the prophet, besides bringing out yet more fully the sins of Ephraim and of Judah, seeks to encourage repentance and trust in God by referring to events in the early history of the patriarch Jacob — his taking the precedence of his brother Esau (v. 3) ; his prevailing prayer at Peniel, and his meeting with God at Bethel (vs. 3-5). 1. Ephraim feedeth on wind, and followeth after tlie east wind : lie daily increasetli lies and desolation ; and tlicy do make a covenant with the Assyrians, and oil is carried into Egypt. "Feedeth on wind," literally, pastureth himself on wind as shep- herds pasture their flocks on grass, which represents his reliance on the merest vanities, on that which can avail him nothing. " Chasing after the east wind " has the same significance. " Every day he multiplieth lies," and consequently " desolation " — ^the deso- lation being manifestly spoken of here as the fruit of his lies. The * 'T'*n — rood, expressed in English letters. EOSEA.— CHAP. XII. ^3 propliet's eye seems to have been on the historic events narrated (2 Kings 17 : 3, 4), where it is stated that tlie king of Assyria came against Iloshca, the last king of Israel ; that Iloshea became his servant and paid him tribute ; that subsequently the king of As- syria " found conspiracy in Hoshea because he sent messengers to So, king of Egypt, and brought no present to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year ; therefore the king of Assyria shut him up and bound him in prison," came up and besieged his capi- tal, subdued his kingdom, and took his people captive. His lies did not pay^ but brought on him and his kingdom ruin. " They made a covenant with the Assyrians," but broke it; " they cf^rried oil into Egypt " as a present or tribute, but Egypt could not save them from the Assyrian power. The last three verbs of this verse — rendered " increaseth," " do make," " is carried" — are all in the incomplete tense, which implies not only that they have done so, but have the heart to do so still. 2. The Lord hatli also a controversy witli Judah, and will punish Jacob according to his ways ; according to his doings will he recompense him. " Controversy," in the same sense as in 4 : 1 — ground of griev- ous complaint, " And will visit upon Jacob " (literally rendered), in the sense of retribution for his sins. " Jacob " in this passage must mean Ephraim, the kingdom of the ten tribes. 3. lie took his brother by the heel in the womb, and by his strength he had power with God : The name " Jacob," applied to the northern kingdom, helps the prophet to pass by an easy transition to the early history of the patriarch who bore this name. " He took his brother by the heel in the womb," indicating that he vrould supplant him in the matter of the birthright and of priority. See the history (Gen. 25 : 2G). The verb from which the name Jacob is derived means " to take by the heel," to supplant. JSTo bad intention or purpose on Jacob's part should attach to this supplanting as here spoken of. It simply indicated the purpose of God to put Jacob before Esau, although born last. This preference is alluded to in this passage to encourage the people to return to their own God. The next clause carries us to the celebrated scene of Peniel, where Jacob wrestled with the angel of the covenant in struggling prayer all night, and finally prevailed, " had power with God," and became a prince through his perseverance and success. The Lord gave him the name Israel, meaning a prince icitli God^ at this very time, both to indicate and to honor his prevalence in prayer. (See Gen. 32 : 28.) " Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel ; for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast pre- vailed." 4. Yea, he had power over the angel, and prevailed : 64: HOSEA.— CHAP. XII. lie wept, and made supplication unto liim : lie found him in Beth-el, and there he spake with us ; To give the nicer shades of thought from the original, and to present the relations of the different persons brought to view, the verse might be rendered somewhat freely, thus : " And then he had power with the angel and prevailed ; he wept and made supplica- tion to him. Also God met him (Jacob) at Bethel, and there spake with him and through him with us." The angel referred to is called God (Elohira) in v. 3, and can be no other than the uncre- ated angel of the covenant, who appears not unfrequentlj in the history of ancient Israel, manifesting divine attributes, and ob- viously being the very Messiah, then, as ever, the Head of the Church on earth. In the record of the scenes of Peniel (Gen. 32 : 24-30), the historian does not call him "the angel," but says, " there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day." This gives his external appearance. But Jacob, when the scene had passed, called the name of the place Peniel, the face of God, " for he said, I have seen God face to face." Much to our point are God's words to Moses (Ex. 23 : 20, 21) : " Behold, I send an an- gel before thee to keep thee in the way and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. Beware of him and obey his voice ; provoke him not ; for he will not pardon your transgressions; for my name is in Mm.'''' The power to pardon sin, implied to exist in him, and especially the last words, " my name " (in the sense of nature and attributes) "is in him," must be considered as amply identifying him to be the second person in the Godhead. With him Jacob wrestled in agonizing prayer^the external struggle be- ing only an index of the inward, which was the vital thing. Jacob was in most imminent peril from his enraged and powerful brother, and therefore must seek help from God. His long agony of strug- gling prayer suggests that he may have had an unsettled account with the " angel of the covenant," some of the items of which may have been his complicity witli his mother in the deception practised by her to get from Isaac the paternal blessing ; and not improbably some lack of faithful reproof of his favorite Eachel in the matter of her proclivities toward idol-worship — things to be re- pented of and adjusted as to God before any signal testimony of his favor could be safely given. It need not surprise us, therefore, that " he wept and made supplication." The fuU history of his heart might show how bitterly he repented of his sins, and how earnestly he plead that God would remember his covenant, and not account the great faults of his servant as a forfeiture of his claims upon God for protection and help. In all its parts this was a wonderful case of persevering and prevailing prayer — one that might well be suggested to the whole Hebrew people in the times of Ilosea as an assurance that such prayer might yet save them, while nothing less or other than this could. Abruptly the prophet passes to the third scene in the life of Jacob — that which HOSEA.— CHAP. XII. . 65 transpired at Bethel. There the Lord God met the youthful Jacob, reminded him of his own covenant with Abraham and Isaac ; re- newed this covenant with Jacob, and left him. Then Jacob awoke from this blessed vision and said, " Surely the Lord is in this place, and I knew it not." " How dreadful is this place ! This is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven ! " See Gen. 28 : 11-22. Some difference of opinion exists as to the sig- nificance of the last word of this verse, " -mj?." In what sense did the Lord speak with us in Bethel ? Ilosea says, " There the Lord found Jacob, and there he spake with not Jacob only, but us." Some have said, the prophet included with Jacob, himself, and perhaps others also, on the score of a common sympathy, as writers sometimes unconsciously suppose themselves to be participating in scenes that awaken in their hearts deep interest. Others, no- ticing that the verb rendered " spake " is in the future, have given it this turn : There the Lord tcill speak with us ; did speak with Jacob, and will no less with us if we seek him as earnestly. The- latter idea — that God will truly speak with us and with all who wait earnestly on him — is no doubt implied ; the Bible usually implies this, though it is rarely deemed necessary to express it. The first of the two views above given is preferable, expanded with this further idea, that the things God said there belong to the whole future family of Jacob, viz. : the promise of Canaan ; a countless seed ; a blessing on all the Iximilies of the earth through his offspring, and the Lord Jehovah for his God and their God. In view of the broad application of the things said then and there to all the Hebrew race, Hosea might well say, " There the Lord spake witJi us " — with us none the less because through Jacob. In this sense the future incomplete tense of the Hebrew is specially appo- site. There was peculiar fitness in this allusion to Bethel— ihQ place made so sacred in those ancient times by the presence of God and by his renewed covenant, but, during many generations re- cently past, most horribly desecrated by giving to a calf the wor- ship due to God alone. 6. Even the Lokd God of hosts ; tlie Loed is liis me- morial. This verse is a close continuation of the preceding. " There Tie spake with us, even the Lord God of hosts." In most English Bibles the name " Lord'''' is printed in smaU capitals when it trans- lates the Hebrew word Jehovah, In this verse the Hebrew reads, "Even Jehovah, God of hosts — Jehovah is his memorial." By this is meant that the name Jehovah is that by which he would be specially known, or, more precisely, is that one of his various names whose significance he would have his people evermore re- member, as to be fulfilled all along onward in the lapse of the ages. All the names given to the Supreme Being are significant, e. (/., "God of Hosts," or of the celestial armies; " El-Shaddai," the Omnipotent or Almighty; " El " alone, the exalted and the mighty 66 HOSEA.— CHAP. XII. Olio ; and in like manner " Jehovali," the immutable, " he that was and is and is to come," forever li/ing and forever the same, the real and the p^reat " / amP See Ex. 8 : 13-15, and 6 : 3, where it is said, '' This is my name forever, and this is my memo- rial nnto all generations;" and where also God said to Moses, "I am Jehovah ; and I appeared unto Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name Jehovah was I not known unto them." This cannot mean that they had never known and used the name Jehovah, for they had. It must therefore mean that God had not fulfilled to them the true significance of this name, i. e., one faithful to his promises. The idea is that this faith- fulness results from his immutability, and that his people do not fuUy Icnow this attribute of God till they have tested and proved it in their experience of his faithfulness in fulfilhng his promises. In this sense the name Jehovah stands through all time as his memo- rial name — ^its significance to be remembered by his people, and perpetually developed and fulfilled more and more in the lapse of ages. The significance of his other names may be verified and ful- fiUed at once ; his omnipotence is seen in tlie creation of worlds and in every real miracle ; but diis name Jehovah is verified only 1)11 the aid of ti?ne, through the occurrence of events transpiring all along down the world's history. In this most expressive sense it is his memorial name, and is adduced by Hosea most fitly in this connection to encourage the people to put their trust in him. G. Therefore, turn tlioii to tliy God : keep mercy and judgment, and wait on tliy God continually. Hence the application here made — " Therefore," since God is forever faithful and true, since he ever has been and ever will be the God of his people Israel, " therefore, turn thou to thy God." "Keep mercy and judgment" — duties toward man; " and wait on thy God continually," living in dependence upon him, and expect- ing all needful good from him alone. Morality toward man and piety toward God make up the sum of human duty — loving God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself. Y. ITe is a mercliant, tlie balances of deceit are in liis hand : he loveth to oppress. The discourse here turns abniptly to another sin of the people of Ephraim — covetousucss and consequent oppression. " The Ca- naanite — balances of deceit are in his hand: " he loves to take ad- vantage in trade, and to drive a gainful bargain to the extent of real oppression. The word " Canaanite " is used for merchant, that people being the traffickers of Western Asia. The Phoenicians, long celebrated for commerce and navigation, were pai't of the original people of Canaan. The word Canaanite means in Hebrew one who acquires, accumulates. To this also the present use of the word may refer. "Balances of deceit" were made to cheat with — one weight for buying and another for selling. Thus (Prov. IIOSEA.—CHAP. XTI. (JY 20 : 23), "An abomination to the Lord is a stone and a stone" (one to bny with and one to sell with) ; " and balances of deceit are not g:ood," i. e., are utterly bad. This allusion to the trading usages of Canaan was shaped to take hold of the people of Ephraim, the more so because the latter, while in general holding the Canaanites in contempt, were yet trading, defrauding, and oppressing in the same way. As if the prophet would say : See the Canaanite ; you tlnnk meanly of him for his low tricks of trade ; what do you think of yourselves ? 8. And Epliraim said, Yet I am become rich, I have fomid me out substance : in all my labours they shall find none iniquity in me that were sin. "Also Ephraim said: Surely I am rich; I have found wealth for myself; in all the fruits of my business they shall find in me no acts of extortion that are sinful." The last word is from the verb which means to miss the mark, to overdo, to overstep due bounds. Ephraim quietly implies that in trade some little crookedness and deception are quite admissible ; (probably he would have said, Who can live by trade otherwise?) But on the other hand there are things so flagrant that all the world will call them sin. He hopes, indeed he is quite sure, they will not find any of this bad sort of sin in his business life. So human nature and the usages and moralities of trade were much the same b. o. 750, when llosea was writing, as they are to-day ! 9. And I that am the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt will yet make thee to dwell in tabernacles, as in the days of the solemn feast. Once more the prophet turns abruptly, as is his wont, to prom- ises, yet again to try the power of persuasion and love on the peo- ple. " Yet I, the Lord thy God ever since Egypt " {i. e., since the exodus from Egypt), " will yet make thee to dwell in tents," &c., with reference to the feast of tabernacles, the great national thanks- giving. This was always a joyful occasion. Hence this verse must be interpreted as a promise of good, and not a threatening of evil. 10. I have also spoken by the prophets, and I have multiplied visions, and used similitudes, by the ministry of the prophets. Literally, " I have spoken to the prophets " — that they might speak for me to the people. During the great apostasy in the latter years of the kingdom of Ephraim, the Lord greatly multiplied prophets and visions. "Similitudes" include poetic figures, and also symbols, which latter comprise both illustrative acts done by the prophets, and also things seen in vision. 11. Is there iniquity m Gilead ? surely they are van- 68 nOSEA.— CHAH. XIII. ity : they sacrifice bullocks in Gilgal ; yea, tlieir altars are as heaps in the furrows of the fields. Literally, " Lo ! Gilead is wickedness ! " The next clause is parallel : " surely they are vanity." Gilead, one of the cities of refuge, where many priests dwelt, has been named for its great wickedness above (6 : 8). Gilgal also was notorious for its idol worship. The Hebrew word " heaps " is a play on the word Gilgal, which means a roUed-up heap of stones. Idol altars were thick there as the heaps of stones in a jdoughed field. . 12. And Jacob fled into the country of Syria, and Israel served for a wife, and for a wife he kept sheep. This brief and abrupt allusion to Jacob was designed to suggest God's watchful care through his providence over his trustful chil- dren. This familiar history is found, Gen. chapters 29-83. 13. And by a prophet the Lokd brought Israel out of Egypt, and by a prophet was he preserved. By this prophet, Moses, the Lord brought up his people from Egypt, and can do like things again ; by this prophet Israel Avas Tcejpt — the same word which is rendered Tcept in v. 12. As Jacob Icejpt sheep — a faithful shepherd — so the Lord by Moses Tcejpt his people, and, as Ilosea v/ould have the people infer, can again. 14. Ephraim provoked him to anger most bitterly : therefore shall he leave his blood upon him, and his re- proach shall his Lord return unto him. But Ephraim has long provoked him most bitterly ; therefore shall his Lord leave his blood upon him, unpardoned, and not washed away, and shall turn back his reproach upon himself. The blood referred to is probably that of children sacrificed to Moloch ; his reproach is that which he had cast upon the ft-ue God by dis- carding his law and worship, and putting idols before him. God would requite this reproach by consigning Ephraim to public con- tempt among the nations of the earth. CHAPTEE XIII. The main drift of this chapter is to set forth the sins of Ephraim and their certain consequences in his ruin — intermingled with some rich assurances of God's love and promises of mercy and help to the penitent. 1. When Ephraim spake trembling, he exalted him- self in Israel ; but when he offended in Baal, he died. HOSEA.—CHAP. XIII. (59 Our translators seem to have supposed tlie first clause to refer to a time wlieii EpLraim was penitent and Immble. More recent investigations in the language show that this sense and construction are scarcely admissible, and by no means probable. The word on which the interpretation hinges, occurs in this precise form no- where else in our Bible. But a cognate word, without much doubt of the same meaning, occurs, Jer. 49 : 24, where it means terror. This word in our passage is a noun, not, as in the English transla- tion, a participial adjective. I translate: "When Ephraim spake, there was trembling ; he stood high in Israel ; but when he sinned in the matter of Baal, he died." Ephraim, as here used, is the one tribe only, not the whole ten. In the early days of the king- dom the influence of this tribe was very great; the word of Ephraim was law, and was heard with trembling. His sin in the matter of Baal proved the ruin of his influence and of himself. 2. And now tliey sin more and more, and have made them molten images of their silver, and idols according to their own understanding, all of it the work of the craftsmen : they say of them. Let the men that sacrifice kiss the calves. The word used here for idols, as above remarked, in 4 : 17, is itself significant of toil and labor in their construction. " Ac- cording to their own understanding " means with their skill, with the best art and tact they have. "Wholly the work of the craftsmen," is yet further expressive of the leading idea that these idols are nothing whatever beyond what men make them. There is nothing else about them, in them, or of them. The prophet means to deny that there is any invisible God dwelling in them. In the phrase " they say of them," the pronoun they is expressed in the llebrew, and hence is made prominent in the thought — re- ferring here to the priests, Avho had the management of idol wor- ship. They gave the order that the men who ofiered sacrifice should kiss the calves. This ceremony was one form of expressing their reverence, confidence, and afiection for these calves. 3. Therefore they shall be as the morning cloud, and as the early dew that passeth away, as the chaif that is driven with the whirlwind out of the floor, and as the smoke out of the chimney. " Therefore," as the fruit of such senseless and guilty worship, their glory shall be evanescent ; the whole nation shall soon disap- pear from the face of the earth, and hold no longer any place among the nations. The threshing floors were fitted up on high hills, and in open, exposed situations, to get the benefit of the wind in cleaning grain. But when an oriental whirlwind feU suddenly upon this operation, the chaff was driven off fearfully. 70 nOSEA.— CHAP. XIII. 4. Yet 1 am the Lord thy God from tlie laud of Egypt, and thou shalt know no God but me : for there is no saviour beside me. Yet fearful as their doom must be, and great as their guilt had been, the Lord reminds them that he has been their God ever since the nation came out from Egyjjt. He evinced this relationship to them then, and had done nothing on his part since to change it. 5. I did know thee in the wilderness, in the land of great drought. " I did know thee in the wilderness," means more than a mere knowledge of what they were. It implies that he had manifested his knowledge of their case by his sympathy, love, and care. He let nothing pertaining to their case or wants escape his notice. The word rendered " drought" means properly, thirst-^ land cele- brated for the tliirst of the weary traveller — one where no water is. In that land, God brought forth water for them from the rock. 6. According to their pasture, so were they filled ; and their heart was exalted : therefore have they for- gotten me. The better God made their condition, or, in the prophet's figure, the better pasture he put them into, the more they were sated ; this fulness begat pride ; and in their pride, they forgat Jehovah. Alas, that this sliould be the history of so many myriads of sinners! God blesses them (must wo say) too much ; they become too full ; then proud ; then they forget God, and become awfully strong in their wickedness ! Y. Therefore I will be unto them as a lion : as a leopard by the way will I observe them. 8. I will meet them as a bear that is bereaved of her whelps, and will rend the caul of their heart, and there will I devour them like a lion : the wild beast shall tear them. The figures to represent swift destruction are multiplied. To " observe," as the leopard, is to lie in wait and watch as for prey. God represents himself as doing what is done instrumentally by the Assyrian arms. 9. O Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself; but in me is thine help. The received translation expresses rich truths with great force. Thou art thine own destroyer ; thy God thine only deliverer. The destruction is wholly thine ; the salvation altogether mine. But although both these propositions are true, and although nOSEA.— CHAP. XIII. 71 their beanty and force are raiicli enhanced by this vivid juxtaposi- tion and contrast, yet a close and careful study of the original raises a serious doubt in my mind whether this is precisely its sense. The first clause is all right. '' Tliine is this destruction ;" but the last clause, having in Hebrew three words, is more closely and perfectly rendered thus : " Because (thou art) against me, against thy help." The strong objection to our received translation is the proposition against before the last word, " thy help." The English translation makes no account of it ; but ITosea does not put in words for nothing. Then also the connecting particle more naturally means 'because than 1)111. In this construction we miss the strong antithesis, but we get a pertinent sense, and one in harmony with the previous and follow- ing context ; — thus v. 8, The Assyrian power shall devour thee : V. 9, This destruction is all of thine own procuring, because thou wast againstHsme, against thy only help : v. 10, Where is thy king now, or any one that can save thee ? &c. 10. I will be tliy king : where is any other that may save thee in all thy cities ? and thy judges of whom thou saidst, Give me a king and princes ? The most apx)roved translation is that in the margin: ""Where is thy king now — that he may save thee in all thy cities ? " In this case the Hebrew marginal reading is followed, not the received text. The difference between the two is that the marginal reading transposes the last two radicals.* The remark is pertinently made in our English margin, that Hoshea, the last king, was at this time in prison, as is stated 2 Kings 17: 4. 11. I gave thee a king in mine anger, and took him away in my wrath. This statement probably has reference to this very king Hoshea. It was true of Saul, and no less so of many of the kings in the king- dom of the ten tribes. But if Vc ask for the particular king thought * The real question for the critic here is whether he shall read '^riJt *'Iwill be;" orj-i'?j^ "Where?" The only difference is in the trans- position of the last two radicals. The critical authorities for the two read- ings in Hebrew are conflicting. I prefer' the latter ( n^iJ<) "Where?" (1.) Because as compared with the other, which is followed in our received version, this flows easily, following the natural order of the Hebrew words ; while that one labors and almost does violence to the word rendered "where," in the clause, " where is any other," &c. (2.) This last-named word (X".EN) strongly indicates that the sentence in which it occurs com- menced with an interrogative. This is its common use — an enclitic or post-positive particle, alter an interrogative. Our received translation makes this word itself an interrogative,, which is scarcely admissible. (3.) The sense is indefinitely more pertinent and forcible — a consideration which, superadded to the preceding, Is conclusive. Y2 nOSEA.— CHAP. XIII. of by the author, no one meets the conditions so well as the last, Hoshea. 12. The iniquity of Epliraim is bound up ; his sin is Md. This refers to what God, not Ephraim, has done with his sin. It is not implied that Ephraim has been able to hide his sin from either man or' God. The figures are taken from a man's tieing up and hiding his money or other valuables for safe-keeping. So God has laid away the sin of Ephraim, to be brought forth another day for terrible retribution ! Of this comicg retribution, the prophet proceeds to speak. 13. Tlie sorrows of a travailing woman shall come upon him : lie is an unwise son ; for lie should not stay long in the place of \h^ breaking forth of children. The received translation of this verse can scarcely be improved. The figure in the first clause suddenly changes. Ephraim is first a mother in her travail pains ; then an infant voluntarily retarding his bwn birth, and thus fearfully imperilling both his own life and the mother's. '^o figures drawn 'from human experience can be more forcible than this — the peril that ensues when " children come to the birth and there is not strength to bring forth." If, now, to get the full force of this passage as applied to Ephraim, we suppose the son to bring on this danger by his own voluntary, intelligent agency, we shall see the infatuation and very madness which Hosca so temperately describes as being "unwise." Ephraim is going to the judgment with God in charge of all his sins, and he still lingers under the call to repent, and will not make peace with his offended judge. The primary reference here is to judgments on eartli, and very near ; yet the principle is even more pertinent and forci- ble as applied to every sinner going to the final judgment. 14. I will ransom them from the power of the grave ; I will redeem them from death : O death, I will be thy plagues, O grave, I will be thy destruction : repentance Bhall be hid from mine eyes. Ephraim is seen ruining himself by his madness. The figure in the prophet's mind suggests death in some of its most painful forms; but God interposes, saying, "I will ransom thee from Sheol ; I wOl redeem thee from death." Sheol, the grave, and death are, of course, personified here, and supposed to be living agents of terrific power over frail mortals. The clauses trans- lated — " O death, I will be thy plagues ; " " O grave, I will be thy destruction — " raise the same critical question which came up in v. 10 — the choice between the interrogative and the indicative form — with, however, less reason for the interrogative here than there. The general sense is the same either way; the interrogative form HOSEA.— CHAP. xni. 73 is the more bold and triumpliant, and lias yet this further fact in its favor, viz. : that Paul (1 Cor. 15 : 55) quotes interrogatively — " O death, where is thy sting ? O grave, where is thy victory ? " In regard to this quotation by Paul, it should be said further, that the words as they stand here do not refer to the resurrection, but to salvation from the ruin then impending over Israel ; but Paul's quotation applies them to the resurrection — the final triumph of our frail mortality over death and the grave, under the power of a resurrection to unfading life and immortality. The words are beautifully applicable to tlie latter event, and are, therefore, fitly used. — — " Eepentance shall be hid from mine eyes," must here bo taken as God's own declaration concerning his purpose just before expressed : ''I will redeem my people and be the destroyer of their worst foes, even of death and the grave, and there shall le no re- versal of this purposey This has no reference to God's hiding his eyes from man's repentance in this world or any other. What- ever may be true as to this, the passage before us has nothing to say about it. All language should be construed and applied with reference to the subject in hand. In this verse the Lord thinks of Ephraim as bringing down on himself remediless ruin ; but he interposes one more promise : I will yet redeem them even from this awful death if they icill repent ; or as the future might be ren- dered — / iDould^ on my part, redeem them, if only they would consent ! 15. Though lie be frnitfiil among 7^/^ Lretliren, an east wind shall come, the wind of the Loed shall come up from the wilderness, and his spring shall become dry, and his fountain shall be dried np : he shall spoil the treasure of all pleasant vessels. Promise of help avails not; so, again, the prophet predicts for Ephraim near impending judgments. Though he may have been eminently fruitful, i. e., populous and prosperous among his brother tribes (said with reference to the significance of his name — Ephraim, the prolific, and with reference also to the facts of his history), yet " an east wind " — often the simoom coming in upon Palestine from the eastern quarter — " the wind of the Lord," i. e. sent by him especially, "from the desert" — this shall "dry up his fountain and spring," and be the ruin of his land. In oriental countries the great scourge of the land is drought. Cut off from water, the land T3ecomes one wide waste of desolation. So of Ephraim. This language has special reference to the Assyrian power, which was God's great instrument for laying waste tlie kingdom of Ephraim. To this Assyrian king the pronoun " he " must be referred ; " he shall spoil the treasures of all desirable, valuable things." 16. Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God : they shall fall by the sword : 4 74 HOSEA.— CHAP. XIY. their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up. This clear, definite announcement of the ruin to come on the kingdom of the ten tribes for their great sins, was obviously made but a short time before the event. Hosea lived and prophesied in the midst of these very scenes. Thus closes what he has to say in the line of rebuking the snis of the people and announcing their coming doom. CHAPTER XIV. This short chapter is a fit and striking sequel to the book of Hosea, almost the entire strain of which sets forth the sins — the ingratitude, incorrigibleness, and the coming doom of the apostate children of Israel. But the Lord cannot let this stern message of rebuke and threatening close without one more call to repentance. If the nation must go down, like a sinking ship into the angry bil- lows, with its vast freight of human souls, they shall at least go with the sounds of oflfered mercy still ringing in their ears ; and further, the Lord would not leave a shade of apology for the infer- ence that his heart is vindictive. After so much said of judgment and wrath, a wrong impression as to these points might be left if the book were to close without yet another testimony to his merci- ful compassion. How tenderly careful not to crush out hope from even the guiltiest bosom, saying, " I will not contend forever, neither will I be always wroth, for the spirit should fail before me and the souls which I have made." (Isa. 57 : 16.) Yet again : the strain of this closing chapter really gloics with the beauty and joy of God's restored people when they repose under his shadow and drink at his fountain of bliss — all in charming contrast with the utter blight that falls on the wicked who pasture themselves on wind and chase after the east wind, and whose best delights turn to ashes on their lips. The joyous prosperity of God's penitent people is one of the strong recommendations of true piety. And finally, the strain of this chapter is doubtless intended as an answer to the question oftener thought than expressed, What will become of the cause and kingdom of God on earth? If his peoi)le prove so hopelessly apostate, despite of such loving and persistent labor to save them, what is the hope for God's kingdom? Here we have the answer." It will yet be seen that this kingdom has the infinite God for its king. The interests of truth and righteousness in the earth may seem to go down in darkness ; but they can at worst only pass under an ecfipse, to shine out the more gloriously in their own appointed time. In this point of view, this closing chapter must be taken as a prophecy of the ultimate triumph of the cause and kingdom of God on earth. nOSEA.—CHAP. XIV. Y5 1. O Israel, return unto the Loed thy God ; for thou hast fallen by thine iniquity. "To the Lord tliy God" — thine own God still — a precious reason for hope and encouragement in your ]*eturn. 2. Take with you words, and turn to the Lord : say unto him. Take away all iniquity, and receive us gra- ciously : so will we render tlie calves of our lips. " Take words " — avail yourself of the aid which the expression of your feelings in fit language will give you ; and, moreover, do this, not merely alone, each in his solitude ; but socially^ the great body of the people uniting as the heart of one man. To " render the calves of our lips," means to respond to God's forgiving mercy with oral expressions of gratitude and praise — offering our lips in- stead of bullocks. The word rendered " calves " means 'bullocks^ and is almost without exception used of bullocks offered in sacri- Jice. The construction in Hebrew is not — the calves of our lips ; but this— so will we give back our lips (as) bullocks — after the manner in which bullocks are brought forth for offerings in sacrifice to God. 3. Asshur shall not save us ; we will not ride upon horses : neither will we say any more to the work of our hands, Y^e are our gods : for in thee the fatherless findeth mercy. The returning penitents pledge themselves specifically against three sins : seeking help from Assyria ; from the use of horses in war, usually brought from Egypt ; and saying any more to what is only the work of their own hands, " Ye are our gods." The reason given is ample — " In God, the fatherless find mercy ; " — the helpless and forlorn, like ourselves, find compassion in him. The word used carries us back to " Kuhamah," as in chapters 1 and 2 — this being the same. 4. I will heal their backsliding, I will love them freely: for mine anger is turned away from him. The Lord himself now speaks in response to their vows and prayers. "Heal them o/ their backslidings " means restore them both in heart and in the external life. " "Will love i\\.Qm freely " —the last most expressive word having the sense of aijontaneous — with warm and full heart, even as the blessed God of love is wont to love the truly penitent soul. 5. I will be as the dew unto Israel : he shall grow as the lily, and cast forth his roots as Lebanon. The dews of Palestine w^ere very heavy, and when in their ful- ness, went far to supply the want of rain. The "lily " is noted 7G HOSEA.— CHAP. XIV. for its beauty. Our Savionr's reference to it will be readily re- called—" Consider the lilies of tlie field," &c. (Matt. 6 : 28, 29). "He," Israel, " shall shoot forth his roots as Lebanon "—referring to its lofty cedars which thrust their roots far out and deep down among the ancient foundations of the mountains, and so withstand the tempests of ages." 6. His brandies shall spread, and Ms beauty shall be as the olive-tree, and liis smell as Lebanon. The olive-tree with its lovely green, famishes another image of God's people under his faithfid culture. Some of the trees and shrubs of Lebanon were fragrant, and perfumed the atmosphere of the mountain, as is indicated here, "the smell of Lebanon." Y. They that dwell under his shadow shall return ; they shall revive as the corn, and grow as the vine : the scent thereof shall he as the wine of Lebanon. "jS^is shadow " is that of God— perhaps suggested by the tacit allusion to the cedars of Lebanon, whose shade is magniiicent. The word rendered scent, in the last clause, is memorial — the same used 12 : 5 — ^meaning, they shall be renowned in fame, as the wine of Lebanon which has to this day the highest repute. 8. Ephraim shall say^ What have I to do any more with idols ? I have heard him, and observed him : I am like a green fir-tree. From me is thy fruit found. Ephraim renounces idols for ever. The Lord takes note of this, and will observe — watch over him with a loving father's care. The fir-tree is an evergreen,~setting forth here that God's love and care are ever enduring — green through all the year. And if the thought sliould arise, "But it yields no fruit" — the Lord at once forestalls that objection. "From me is thy fruit found;" all fruit comes, not from creatares, even the best and surest of them, but from myself. 9. Who is wise, and he shall understand these things f prudent, and he shall know them 1 for the ways of the Lord are right, and the just shall walk in them : but the transgressors shall fall therein. The interrogatives here call the reader's special attention. Tlie subject-matter of this book — God's ways of judgment and of mercy toward his people, wayward or penitent — are here set before you ; whoever is wise shall understand them and learn their lessons of great truth and of practical life. For God's ways are altogether right ; the just, in the sense of upright, honest, and sincere, shall walk in them with peace and gladness thi'ough usefulness and honor here to a blissful end hereafter ; but transgressors, whom no truth HOSEA.— CHAP. XIV. 77 can reach to bless, shall stumble and fall under the very influences that bring salvation to the just. Such are the lessons of this richly instructive book of Hosea. We shall need to go far to find other writings more forcible, more tersely written, more beautiful in their poetic imagery, more burn- ing in their rebukes of sin, and more glowing in their testimonies to the dee^D compassion and yearning love of God toward sinful man. JOEL. INTEODUCTION. The precise date and duration of the prophetic life of Joel may be conjectured, but cannot be certainly known. He is not named elsewhere in the Old Testament Scriptures. His prophecy seems to be quoted both by Amos (compare Amos 1 : 2 with Joel 3 : 16) and by Isaiah (compare Isaiah 13:6 with Joel 1 : 15). Amos prophe- sied at some period within the long reigns of Uzziah of Judah, b. o. 811-759, and of Jeroboaui 11. of Israel, b. c. 825-784. Hence, if the writings of Joel were in the hands of Amos, he cannot have prophesied later than the reign of Uzziah ; he may have been many years earlier. Ilis book shows tliat he prophesied in Judah, and that the temple worship was then kept up. Eemarkably, the book does not notice the kingdom of the ten tribes nor the sin of idola- try. The people are exhorted to repentance, to fasting, weeping, and rending of the heart. It may be inferred that in such a book idolatry would have been rebuked if it had been then prevalent. Some have argued, from his silence respecting the Syrian power, while he mentions Tyre and Sidon (3 : 4) as enemies, that he must have lived before their first invasion of Judah in the time of Ahab (reigned b. o. 918-897). See 1 Kings, chapters 20-22. But this cannot be conclusive, since he might know the Syrian kingdom as an enemy, and yet not mention it. Some weight is rightly given to the fact that the compilers of these sacred books have placed Joel between Hosea and Amos. In general, they observed the order of time, and it is safe to assume that, living so near the age of those prophets, they must have known with a fair measure of accuracy JOEL.— CHAP. I. 79 when Joel lived and wrote. This compilation is usually ascribed to Ezra and his associates — ^perhaps we should rather say, Ezra and his successors. The earliest historical notice of a collection known as " the Twelve Minor Prophets," is in the hook of " Ecclesiasti- cus," or "Wisdom of Jesus, Son of Sirach" (49:10), in these words : " And of the Twelve Prophets let the memorial he blessed, and let their bones flom*ish again out of their place, for they com- forted Jacob and dehvered them by assured hope." The original of this book bears date 180 b. o. But there is good reason to sup- pose this compilation to be not much if any later than Malachi, about 420 b, c. Joel may have been somewhat earlier than Hosea, and yet be placed after him in order because shorter or for other reasons. I incline to assign him an earlier date than Hosea. Pos- sibly (not probably) the famine which he portrays so vividly was that terrible one of seven years referred to (2 Kings 8 : 1) in the reign of Jehosaphat in Judah (reigned b. o. 914-891) and of Jeho- ram, son of Ahab, in Israel (reigned b. c. 89G-884). With these only appro \-'n ate results I pass the question of date. Another question, at once more difficult and more important, respects the principles of interpretation which shall rule throughout the first two chapters. On this depends the determination of the primary and proper sense. On this point very able commentators disagree. It is admitted by all that the language seems to describe a fearful visitation of locusts, coupled with drought and consequent famine. But some, with Dr. Hengstenberg, hold that there were no real locusts. Foreign enemies " present themselves to the in- ward contemplation of the prophet as an all-devouring swarm of locusts." — (Vol. 3 : 103.) That is, Joel saw the locusts only in vis- ion; the only real visitation was that of armed men — the real scourge was war. Others, with Dr. Henderson, find real locusts, desolating the land, throughout chapter 1. In chapter 2, armed bands are the real thing, but they are compared to locusts. The locust bands, then recent, furnish the imagery by which they are described. Others still suppose that real locusts are definitely described throughout chapter 1, and also 2 : 1-27. Yet this being a most fearful visitation, a striking and even appalling proof of God's power to inflict judgments on guilty men and guilty nations,^t be- came naturally suggestwe of what the wicked have to fear in some other and more terrible " great day of the Lord." Without ad- mitting the doctrine of a doable sense, i. e.^ two distinct and coOr- 80 JOEL.— CHAP. I. dinate senses of the same words and phrases, it may yet be reason- ably held that a fearful devastation by locusts may suggest the ruin brought on a country by war, or by those unknown agencies of destruction which God has in store for the guilty in his magazines of wrath. This latter view I accept, constrained in general by the fact that this seems to be the obvious $ense of the passage. My plan of commentary precludes any extended discussion of opinions from which I dissent, yet briefly I must reject the first theory above named as too foreign from the obvious sense of the language. There is no hint that the locusts are seen in vision only, and stand merely as symbols and figures of armed men. Heng- stenberg speaks of it as an " allegory," but the manner and air of an allegory are wanting. Every allegory should furnish clear evi- dence of its being such. Besides this, an allegory should not give a minute natural history of the locust. The second theory fails to harmonize with the drift of the description, for the second chap- ter gives us locusts as clearly as the first. In vs. 4-9 these locusts are compared to armed men — not armed men to locusts — a distinc- tion which Dr. Henderson seems to ignore or at least overlook. Other remarks bearing on the true interpretation may be suggested in the notes on particular passages. In this book there will be very little occasion to comment on the meaning of particular words and clauses. The received trans- lation in most cases is excellent, and gives the sense of the original with accuracy. The point of chief difficulty and of greatest mo- ment is, to arrive at the ultimate sense and instruction — the mind of the Spirit of truth. CHAPTER I. A PLAGUE of locusts comes upon the land, nnparalleled in its kind; they are described, vs. 6, 7, their devastations, vs. 9-12, 16- 20, and various classes of the people are summoned to mourning, vs. 5, 8, 9, 13, and to fasting, v. 14. 1^ The word of the Lokd that came to Joel the son of Petlmel. With the greatest brevity we are simply told that this book is the word of God that came to Joel. 2. Hear this, ye old men, and give ear, all ye inhab- JOEL.— CHAP. I. 81 itants of the land. Hath this been in your days, or even in the days of your fathers ? 3. Tell ye your children of it, and let your children tell their children, and their children another generation. "Hatli this been in your days?" must mean, Hatli ox^j such thing as this been — any visitation so fearful and so desolating ? He appeals to the oldest men to say if, either in their days or in the days of their fathers, so gi'eat a judgment in its kind has befallen the land. Y. 4 opens the description. 4. That which the palmer-worm hath left hath the locust eaten ; and that which the locust hath left hath tlie canker-worm eaten; and that which the canker- worm hath left hath the caterpiller eaten. Successive armies of locusts come upon the land, each, accord- ing to the strong language of this description, devouring all that the next preceding had left. Great labor has been expended on the natural history of the locusts spoken of in the Bible. They appear under about ten different names, but whether these names represent ten distinct species remains in doubt. This point has no very great practical importance. It is important, however, to the full impression of these chapters, that the power of these locusts for devastation should be understood. One author says: "Man can conquer the tiger and the lion ; can turn the course of mighty rivers, and chain the winds to his car, and can play with the light- nings of heaven, but he is nothing before an army of locusts." Another says: " In some regions of the East the whole earth is at times covered with locusts for the space of several leagues, often to the depth of four, sometimes of six or seven inches. Their ap- proach, with a noise like the rushing of a torrent, darkens the hori- zon, hides the light of the sun, and casts an awful gloom like that of an eclipse over the fields." Major Moore, when at Poonah, had an opportunity of seeing an immense army of locusts which rav- aged the Mahratta country, and was supposed to have come fi'om Arabia.. Their column extended five hundred miles, and so com- pact was it when on the wing, that, like an eclipse, it completely hid the sun. Pliny calls them " a scourge in the hand of an in- censed Deity." Before them all verdure disappears; the wLjle country puts on the appearance of being burnt. Fire itself devours not so fast. Not a vestige of vegetation is left behind th^m. In a few hours they eat up every green thing, and consign the mis- erable inhabitants to inevitable famine. " The husbandmen make every effort possible to stay or turn aside these foes or destroy them ; they build fires or raise a dense smoke to withstand them, or dig trenches and fill them with water, but all to no purpose ; for the trenches are soon filled and the fires extinguished by infinite swarms succeeding one another, and forming a bed on their fields 4* 82 JOEL.— CHAP. I. of six or seven inclies in thickness. When they die the efBrnia becomes intolerable, and often has occasioned a pestilence fearfully destructive to human life." These few facts will suffice to show that the locust is one of the most terrible agents for destruction in the hands of the Almighty. 5. Awake, ye drunkards, and weep ; and howl, all ye drinkers of wine, because of tlie new wine ; for it is cut off from your mouth. Wine-drinkers are called to weep and howl, because their new wine, called " must," fails them. 6. For a nation is come up upon my land, strong, and without number, whose teeth are the teeth of a lion, and he hath the cheek teeth of a great lion. Y. He hath laid my vine waste, and barked my fig tree; he hath made it clean bare, and cast it away; the branches thereof are made white. The word here rendered " nation " is usually applied to heathen nations, considered as the enemies of God and of his people. In this case it implies that they are public enemies, a scourge sent of God upon his land. They are strong by reason of their great num- bers ; their teeth are terrible because of the devastations they can make. Stripping off all the foliage and even the bark, they leave only a mass of ruins and bare white branches. Tlie grasshopper of our country bears a close resemblance to the oriental locust. The latter, however, appear in immensely greater numbers, and make their desolations absolutely complete and universal. 8. Lament like a virgin girded with sackcloth for the husband of her youth. 9. The meat-offering and the drink-offering is cut off from the house of the Loed ; the priests, the Lokd's ministers, mourn. 10. The field is wasted, the land mourneth ; for the corn is wasted : the new wine is di*ied up, tlie oil languisheth. By a change in the usage of our English word " meat," within the last two hundred years, it has come to mean the flesh of animals. Anciently it was used in the general sense of food, and sometimes in the specific sense o^xegetable food. Thus (Gen. 1 : 29, 30) God said, " I have given to you," i. e. toman, " every herb, and the fruit of trees, for meat f^ and "to every beast," &c., "have I given every green herb for meat.'''' So here, this "meat-offering" consisted of flour, meal, or cakes, with oil, frankincense, but not a particle of flesh. Hence- the locusts swept it all away. Those who loved JOEL.— CHAP. I. 83 the service of the Lord were specially afflicted, because they were no longer able to bring to his temple the accustomed and required offerings. 11. Be ye ashamed, O ye liiisbandmen ; howl, O ye vine-dressers, for the wheat and for the barley ; because the harvest of the field is perished. Confounded expresses the exact sense, rather than " ashamed," since shame properly implies some sense of guilt. Here the idea is that they were at their wit's end — all their labor had come to naught. 12. The vine is dried up and the fig-tree languish- eth ; the pomegranate-tree, the palm-tree also, and the apple-tree, even all the trees of the field, are withered : because joy is withered away from the sons of men. 13. Gird yourselves, and lament, ye priests: howl, ye ministers of the altar : come, lie all night in sack- cloth, ye ministers of my God : for the meat-ofi*ering and the drink-ofierinff is withholden from the house of your God. ° ^ 14. Sanctify ye a fast, call a solemn assembly, gather the elders and all the inhabitants of the land into the house of the Lord your God, and cry unto the Lokd. The evil was by far the more serious, since not only the vege- tables — annual plants — but trees of many years' growth, withered and died under this fearful scourge, so that joy — the joy men feel in these sources of earthly good — withered away. Here is an- other call to mourning over these calamities, and especially and most pertinently to fasting, and to a general gathering in the house of God to lift up their prayer to him. Nothing can be more ap- propriate in seasons of calamity than to humble our hearts before the Lord, and seek his face with deep humility for our great sins. 15. Alas for the day ! for the day of the Lord is at hand, and as a destruction from the Almighty shall it come. The locusts being spoken of as present and this " day of the Lord " as being only " ?zear," grave questions arise here ; viz. : What is this "day of the Lord" which is near, but not (as it would seem) yet present ? Is it the visitation of locusts, and nothing beyond and greater? If something beyond and greater, then what pre- cisely is it ? Does the prophet intend to make his description of it definite, as of some special event; or -rather to leave it indefinite, designing only to impress the thought of the awfulness and terror of God's retributive judgments, however and whenev^* sent? 84 JOEL.— CHAP. I. If there were nothing else in Joel bnt this (v. 15), looking tow- ard another great day of the Lord, there would be no special difficulty in interpreting this of the locusts exclusively. For it might be urged that the locusts were even then scarcely present, and the terribleness of this scourge was still in the nearer future ; that the tenses in Hebrew and especially in prophecy are not used with such definite precision as in most other languages ; also, that the next verses continue the subject of locusts and the drought as if no other thought had been before the writer's mind. But this verse does Tiot stand alone in reference to the question now before us. The passage (2 : 1) repeats — "For the day of the Lord Cometh, for it is nigh at hand ;" and, of more weight still (in 2 : 81) we read : " The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and terrible day of the Lord come.'* This plainly shows that the prophet has some thought of another great and fearful, but somewhat remote, " day of the Lord," besides this in which locusts are the manifestation of his retributive ven- geance. Here, then, are various allusions to a "great day of the Lord," to be explained and accounted for. Do we not find the key to their exposition in those laws of mental association which, under the awe-inspiring power of a present judgment, like this of locusts, carry the mind over to the more awful future — to the great power of Almighty God to bring forth from the storehouse of his plagues far more terrible, annihilating judgments, and which make every mind feel that God's judgments are near at hand? This law of mind is well known. The effect of any present judgment is to make all future judgments seem near. It leads the mind to antici- pate them with confidence, to take this present one as itself a proph- ecy and pledge of more and other in the futm-e, and to lose sight of whatever time may intervene before they come. Thus, a single death-bed scene makes death seem near to ourselves. Sudden deaths by hundreds, as in the awful cholera pestilence, make stout hearts quail under a sense of God's power and justice, so that it shall seem that death and judgment are at the door. Moreover, a guilty conscience fearfully heightens this sense of the great day of the Lord as near at hand. Thus powerfully suggestive was this fearful day of visitation by locusts. It brought fresh to the proph- et's mind a sense of the awful guilt of his people, and of the certainty and nearness of God's sorer judgments. And, moreover, as he wrote /br moral impression^ and as the divine Spirit had this main if not sole purpose, it need not surprise us that he deems it of no special importance to speak more definitely of the time or manner of these yet future visitations of judgment. Suffice it if he can impress on the souls of wicked men the solemn thought that God's great day of judgment to them cannot be long delayed ! Yet further, as bearing on the sense of this verse, let it be noted that the most fearful thing in any form of judgment is that it comes from God^^ and is a proof of his stern displeasure. The conscious sense of his wrath burning against us is of all things most awful. JOEL.— CHAP. I. g5 This becomes fitly the all-absorbing thought. Any form of judg- ment may suffice to awaken this feeling. Once awakened in a consciously guilty bosom, the man knows and feels Ihat more and greater demonstrations of God's displeasure must be near. In view of these laws of mind and of their relations to the question in hand, I see in this verse, and also in 2:1, no evidence of allusion to any other speciJiG day, as e. g,. the invasion of the Assyrian army. To suppose this, seems foreign from the general drift of the prophet's thought. Besides, if he had wished to predict that invasion, it is marvellous that he should not have made his statements more definite. The original words rendered "destruc- tion" and " almighty" are from kindred roots — as if we should say, " a miglity ruin from the Almiglity hand." 16. Is not the meat cut off before our ejes, yea^ joy and gladness from the house of our God ? The same idea as in v. 9, resumed and reiterated interrogatively — Is it not so ? The prophet reverts to the subject in hand (vs. 2-14) as if no thought of any other day had come in to divert it. This fact shows that v. 15 is no new and foreign subject, but only some- thing naturally suggested by his main theme. 17. The seed is rotten under their clods, the garners are laid desolate, the barns are broken down ; for the corn is withered. The effects of extreme drought, coupled with the work of the locusts. No seed vegetates ; all harvests fail. 18. How do the beasts groan ! the herds of cattle are perplexed, because they have no pasture ; yea, the flocks of sheep are made desolate. The "cattle are perplexed" — the original word, looking, how- ever, not so much to a state of mind as to its manifestations. They wander up and down as if bewildered and at their wit's end. 19. O Lord, to thee will I cry : for the fire hath de- vom-ed the pastures of the wilderness, and the flame hath burned all the trees of the field. 20. The beasts of the field cry also unto thee : for the rivers of waters are dried up, and the fire hath devoured the pastures of the wilderness. The prophet declares his purpose to cry unto the Lord for help and mercy, for the twofold reason that his heart feels so, and that he would lead the people also to prayer for help. Thus closes this chapter — a most graphic, life-like description of a fearful devastation by drought and locusts — so severe and so ter- rible as to impress the mind with a sense of the weakness of man 86 JOEL.— CHAP. II. before the great and dreadful God, and of liis guilt before One too boly to pass over sin without manifesting his sore displeasure. CHAPTEE II. The great alarm is sounded forth from the temple as usual in the presence of some dire calamity (v. 1) ; a more full description of the locusts is given — in part personal (vs. 4-9, and in part general and in the line of their effects (vs. 2, 3, 10, 11) : the Lord exhorts the people to return to him (vs. 12-14). A solemn assembly is called for fasting and prayer (vs. 15-17) ; the Lord answers gra- ciously (vs. 18-20), and passes over to rich promises of mercy, in- cluding rain and abundant harvests (vs. 21-27) ; and finally to the fuller promise of his Spkit in the latter time (vs. 23, 28-32). 1. Blow ye tlie trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain : let all the inhabitants of the land tremble : for the day of the Loed cometh, for it is nigh at hand ; " Blowing tlie trumpet and sounding an alarm " from the temple was of divine appointment in the law given through Moses. (See Num. 10: 1-10.) It convened the people to consider and act upon any case of general calamity, and had the promise — " Ye shall be remembered before the Lord your God, and ye shall be saved from your enemies." The near " coming of the day of the Lord" is analogous to chap. 1 : 15, and must be explSined in the same way. 2. A day of darkness and of gloominess, a day of clouds and of thick darkness, as the morning spread upon the mountains : a great peo])le and a strong ; there hath not been ever the like, neither shall be any more after it, even to the years of many generations. Darkness is often, with the Hebrew poets especially, a symbol of calamity. In this verse, however, there is no occasion to inter- pret it as a symbol. It is rather actual — the darkness produced by immense clouds of locusts, obscuring the light of day. lliis dark- ness came on and passed over the land " as the light of morning spread over the mountains ;" where the point of the comparison is not in any supposed resemblance between dai'kness and light, for there is none ; but in the manner of its coming on over the face of the earth. As the morning light sweeps up from the east, first gilding the mountain-tops, and then quietly pervading the whole face of the earth, so this darkness swept on as an avalanche of cloud, and rested like a dark pall of gloom and terror on the whole land. That this visitation should be described as surpassing anj JOEL.— CHAP. II. 87 ever known before, and even any that should come after for many generations, need not surprise us. It may have been strictly true of it while it lasted^ and in reference to judgments of this sort. More- over, men suifering under any fearful infliction, naturally express themselves in such strong terms. 3. A fire devouretli before them ; and behind them a flame burneth : the land is as the garden of Eden before them, and behind, them a desolate wilderness ; yea, and nothing shall escape them. "Fire" and "flame" are probably figurative; the desolation they wrought being like that of tire on the prairies, as if fire swept on before them, and again behind them, Jeaving absolutely noth- ing more to be destroyed. Exquisitely forcible and touching is this — the land seen in all the beauty of Eden before them, but be- hind them only a desolate wilderness. 4. The appearance of them is as the appearance of horses ; and as horsemen so shall they rnn. 6. Like the noise of chariots on the tops of moun- tains shall they leap, like the noise of a flame of fire that devonreth the stubble, as a strong people set in battle array. Locusts have been often compared to horses, as in Eev. 9 : T:— "The shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared for battle." They are fleet like horsemen, moving rapidly with the wind. The figure of an army moving in solid phalanx and fear- ful array, is constantly present to the mind. Yet the thing described is an army, not of men, but of locusts. The locusts are lihe armed horsemen. He does not say that armed horsemen are coming on, and are like locusts. 6. Before their face the people shall be much pained : all faces shall gather blackness. The word rendered " blackness " nieans rather a glow or flush of anxiety. The sense is — the people become intensely agitated with fear and alarm. T. They shall run like mighty men ; they shall climb the wall like men of war ; and they shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not l3reak their ranks : 8. l^either shall one -fhrust another ; they shall walk every one in his path : and when they fall upon the sword, they shall not be wounded. 9. They shall run to and fro in the city ; they shall 88 JOEL.— CHAP. 11. run upon tlie wall, thej shall climb up upon tlie houses ; they shall enter in at the windows like a thief. It cannot be reasonably doubted that this is, and is intended to be, a closely accurate description of locusts, as they sweep along in their onward march for devastation. Every feature is in its place, made true to the reality by a master's hand. That the sword avails nothing against them goes to confirm this view, and to shut off the ' possibility of applying the description to the Assyrian army. 10. The earth shall quake before them ; the heavens shall tremble : the sun and the moon shall be dark, and the stars shall withdraw their shining : Strong poetic imag^y should not be pressed to an extremely literal sense. In this passage, we need not insist that the locusts produced an earthquake, or any real concussion of the heavens. Jerome says pertinently on this passage : " Not that the locusts have so much power that they can move the heavens and shake the earth ; but to those who are in great suffering and extreme terror, it will seem that the heavens are falHng and the earth tossing under their feet." Strong feeling naturally expresses itself in strong language. The darkening of the sun, moon, and stars, is a com- mon figure for a great calamity ; as, on the other hand, sun-rising and the joyous light of day are S3Tiibols of prosperity. The reader may find scriptural examples in abundance, e. g., of the former class— J^er. 4: 28; Ezek. 32: T, 8; Isa. 13: 10; Matt. 24: 29. The consternation commonly felt for many ages when an eclipse occurred, shows how forcible this figure must have been in ancient times. Moreover, there may be here a tacit allusion to the actual darkening of the heavens, occasioned by the flight of countless myriads of locusts. 11. And the Loed shall utter his voice before his army : for his camp is very great : for he is strong that executeth his word : for the day of the Loed is great and very terrible ; and who can abide it ? That " his army" is none other than the locusts, is put beyond a doubt by the Lord himself (v. 25), where he says of the locust, caterpUlar, etc., " my great army which I sent among you." The words in Hebrew as well as in the Enghsh version are the same in both passages. This locust army is strong to execute the mandate of Jehovah. Sent by him, they ai-e terribly efficient in devastating the land. This " day of the Lord " can look to nothing else pri- marily save the visitation of locusts. " Abide " is here used in the sense of endure, 12. Therefore also now, saith the Loed, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and Avith mourning : JOEL.— CHAP. II. g9 13. And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto tlie Loed your God : for he is gracions and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repentetli him of the evil. 14. Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him, even a meat-oifering and a drink-oifering nnto the Loed yonr God ? This is the only appropri.) That having thus made provision for teaching the people righteousness, the reason for withholding rain for discipline or in judgment, will cease, and the Lord will now give rain without stint, since he safely can, without moral harm. The latter I incline to make specially prominent. (8.) If, with our English Bible, w^e render "the former rain moderately," then the last part of the verse is tame repetition, and makes no progress in the thought : thus—" He gives you the former rain moderately, and he causes to come down the rain, the former and the latter rain." It is scarcely supposable that this, can be the true rendering. This objection cannot be relieved by the differ- ence in tense, presented in our common version — " he hath given ;" and " he will cause to come down ;" for the Hebrew tenses do not sustain this distinction. (9.) Giving this clause the sense — " the Teacher of righteousness " with reference to spiritual blessings, and somewhat to gospel times, there is a striking antithesis between this verse and v. 28 ; v. 23 promises "the Teacher of righteousness, in the first place." (Our translators found nothing for their word "month.") The Hebrew 't t : I JOEL.— CHAP. II. 95 means — "in the first place," tlie first instalment of blessings. Tlien V. 28 promises that '■'• afterward^'''' another instalment shall be given. As the latter is not rain, so neither is the former. As the latter is the Spirit, so is the former. 1 suggest yet another antithesis : v. 23, addressing specially 'Hhe children of Zion," says — "He gives, to you the Teacher of righteousness;" v.. 28, over against this, has it — "I. will pour out my Spirit on all fleshy In verse 23, the pro- noun you is fully expressed, and for this reason, by Hebrew law, is slightly emphatic, or at least distinctly prominent. Hence the evi- dence of designed antithesis is the stronger. (10.) This antithesis becomes yet somewhat more direct, if by "the Teacher of righteousness " we understand the Holy Spirit — the same blessing promised in v. 28, given first to the children of Zion, and " afterwards poured out on all flesh." " All flesh," by current usage as well as by the legitimate sense of the words, should mean the Avhole human family, and in this antithesis, the Gentile world. (See Gen. 6 : 12 ; Ps. G5 : 2 and 145 : 21 ; Isa. 40 : 5, 6, &c.) True, the specifications that immediately follow lead the mind rather to the idea of all classes of society — "sons and daughters," "old men and young," '^' servants and handmaids" — ^this wide range of classes being perhaps in antithesis with the former limita- tions to the priestly and prophetic orders, to which latter the prom ise (v. 23), may have special reference. That is, the promise of " the Teacher of righteousness," referring primarily to the Holy Spirit, would contemplate the Spirit as working upon the people through his priests and prophets, and thus turning them to right- eousness. The next instalment of these blessings would greatly increase the number of his immediate agents. The New Testament seems to assume that, ordinarily, the Spirit reaches the ungodly through the media of Christians, working and praying " in the Spirit," while he comes down upon Christians directly^ both to anoint them for their Christian labor for tlie ungodly, and to secure their own sanctification. This second instalment (v. 28) therefore looks toward the unlimited extension of the Spirit's agencies by multiplying the number and enlarging the circle of his immediate agents. The arguments then against restricting the eff'usion of the Spirit, promised vs. 28, 29, to the Hebrew line, and /(>r its un- limited extension, stand briefly thus : (a.) " All flesh " legitimately means all mankind, (h.) The specifications only show that the circle of special agents through whom the Spirit works will be vastly en- larged — indeed, will comprise all classes of society — and thus will provide the instrumentalities for diff'using the Spirit's influence over all the world, {c.) Peter applies " all flesh" in this large, unlimited sense (Acts 2 : 21, 39) : " Whosoeter shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved," (which is his version of Joel 2 : 32), and — "For the promise is unto you and to your children, and to all that are afar off^ even as many as the Lord our God shall call." ' This argument from Peter's exposition of Joel is the stronger, because it is pre- eminently the Spirit's exposition, and not Peter's — the latter not 96 • JOEL.— CHAP. II. having yet really understood the sense of these words. Acts 10 shows hoth wJien and liow his mind was opened to the grand idea that " of a trutli God is no respecter of persons ; " but gives gospel blessings to Gentile as to Jew. (11.) That MoreJi, the Teacher, refers to the Holy Spirit rather than specially to the Messiah, is certainly favored by the strong anal- ogy, everywhere apparent throughout the Old Testament, between the Spirit and the gift of rain — between the agencies of the Spirit, and reviving, cleansing water. This analogy does not hold between rain and the Messiah. That rain is a symbol of the Spirit, probably both in manner of coming and in consequent effects, is apparent even here in v. 28 : " I will jp(??/r out my Spirit." The very form of expression shows that this analogy is before the proph- et's mind. So also Isa. 44 : 3, "I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground : I will pour my Spirit upon thy seed, and my blessing upon their offspring." Or Ezek. 86 : 25, " Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean .... from yoiu* filthiness :" — "I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walk in my statutes." The parallelisms here furnish all the evidence needed to show that in these passages water is thought of only as a figure for the Spirit. Many other passages might be cited from the Old Testament in which the close analogy between the Spirit and water is boldly prominent. Ezekiel, in his last recorded vision, saw living waters flow from under -the sanctuary and soon become a mighty river — manifestly looking onward to that blessed age when the fulness of the Spirit shall be shed forth to make pure and effective all the forms of social and moral influences in human society. Let us note also that this passage (Ezek. 47) is the more in point here because it was manifestly suggested by tlie passage Joel 3 : 18, and is strictly an expansion of Joel's thought : — " All the rivers of Judah shall flow with water, and a fountain sliall come forth of the hou&e of the Loni^ and shall water the valley of Shittim." (12.) It is plausibly objected to the rendering, "Teacher of righteousness," that, admitting it, the thought is dropped too soon, and that the current of remark (vs. 24-27) seems to ignore it, as it could not if the gospel idea were really there in the words which I render "The Teacher of righteousness;" in other words, that room enough is not allowed for a thought so great and so import- ant as this. A closer examination will obviate this objection. First, the greatest joy is invoked in view of the gift of the Teacher of righteousness. Then this teacher is to be a present as well as a future blessing, inasmuch as he will manifest his power through his anointed servants — the priests and the prophets of the old dispen- sation. See Zech. 4 throughout, and especially vs. 11-14. Hence the prosperity of the people will hopefully become both great and permanent, since, when they are radically turned to righteousness, nothing wiU restrain the rich gifts of God's providence. More- over, these views and these only give their full force to verses 26, JOEL.—CHAP. II. 97 27 — " Ye shall eat in plenty and be satisfied, and praise the name of the Lord yonr God who hath dealt wondronsly with you ; and my people shall never be ashamed ; and ye shall know that I am in the midst of Israel, and that I am the Lord your God and none else; and my people shall never be ashamed." That they should praise God who had " wrought wondronsly " in scourging them for their sins, and in thus drawing them back to humiliation, repent- ance, and a godly life ; that they should know that the Lord is their God and is verily in the midst of them — know it by his disciphne and by its " peaceable fruits of righteousness ; " that they should never be put to shame before their foes, but always live so that the Lord should be their trust and salvation; all these things imply more than a present supply of rain. Their meaning cannot be ex- hausted short of a living fountain of spiritual truth and life, flow- ing from the great Teacher of righteousness through his inspired prophets. (13,) Still another objection will strike many minds against the assumed antithesis between the clauses " Teacher of righteous- ness," V. 23, and " I will pour out my Spirit," v. 28, viz.. Why are the names and statements so diverse if they mean the same thing ? If V. 23 means the Holy Spirit, why did not the language say so? I reply {a.) As I have already hinted, there may be some re- gard to these facts, viz., that rain is before the mind ; that the ideas of rain and of teacher ^.re associated in the same Hebrew verb ; and yet more, that there is a close and constant analogy in the Hebrew mind between water and rain on the one hand, and the Holy Spirit on the other. (5.) But probably more weight still in determin- ing th.G form of the expression " Teacher of righteousness," is due to the nature of the case in hand, the special sort of blessing needed by the people, as seen in the light of events then present. Great sin had brought upon them a great scourge of locusts, drought and famine. Eepentance and divine mercy had driven oif the lo- custs and brought them rain and bread, but yet the people were not half saved without a permanent Teacher of righteousness. A divine teacher, himself teaching their teachers, and holding the people permanently to righteousness, was precisely the greatest blessing possible in their case ; was the very blessing they needed ; was the only thing requisite to fill their cup full. These now are not only reasons why God should give the people his Spirit, but were also reasons why He should designate him thus : " The Teacher of righteousness." This name indicated the work most essential then, in the light of the recent calamities and their causes. Hence the name. It is shaped by the surroundings, by the facts then spe- cially present to the mind. Why should it not be ? Finally, since this special interpretation which refers the phrase " Teacher of righteousness " rather to the Spirit than to the Son, is mainly if not wholly new, I choose to present it as a suggestion. I do not press it as a point of vital importance. That the passage promises spiritual and not temporal blessings, the teaching of right- k 98 JOEL.— CHAP. 11. eonsness and not merely the gift of rain, I think is entirely clear and withal a point of practical value. Theologically there can be no prejudice against it, for while teaching was one office of the Messiah, it was not the only or the chief one, but it is the chief and characteristic function of the Spirit. Jesus himself said of tlie Spirit, " He shall teach you all things ; " and yet more, if possible, to the point in hand, "When he is come, he will reprove the world of sin and of righteousness.^^ 24. And the floors sliall be full of wheat, and the fats shall overflow with wine and oil. 25. And I will restore to you the years that the lo- cust hath eaten, the canker-worm, and the caterpillar, and the palmer-worm, my great ai-my which I sent among you. In the clause " The years that the locust hath eaten," the plu- ral "years" indicates that this scourge was not transient nor lim- ited even to one year, but continued through several, a most terriQc visitation of divine judgment. But the Lord would make good to his people all the losses and sufferings of those long-remembered years. He seems to refer primai'ily to restoration in Mnd, i. e., in corn, and wine, and oil ; but if he would restore those things of less value, how much more will he make up their losses in the earthly line by superabounding mercies in the spiritual line ! This is the wise and ever precious way of the Lord to restore to his penitent people earthly good in jiist measure, but heavenly, in. all the plen- itude of his grace. 26. And ye sliall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of the Loed your God, that hath dealt wondronsly with you : and my people shall never be ashamed. 27. And ye shall know that I am in the midst of Israel, and that I am the Loed your God, and none else : and my people shall never be ashamed. A thanksgiving festival over these mercies would be eminently fitting, especially the thanksgiving and the praise. This repeti- tion is designed to give special force to two ideas : (1) that God's people should };noio by their precious experience that their own God is in the midst of them, a Power and a Eefuge, and an only God, there being no other; and (2) that his people, confiding in his love and help, shall never be put to shame. This confidence in their God can never prove abortive. It is always safe to trust in his name. So trusting, his people never have been confounded and never can be. Knowing by personal experience that God is in the midst of us through scenes of sore affliction, until deliverance and restoring mercy appear, implies that we apprehend the great JOEL.— CHAP. 11. 99 idea of God's use of eartlily discipline, viz., to make all things work together for good to those who love him. "When Israel came out from under the scourge of locusts and famine, penitent and hum- bled, drawn thereby the nearer to God, and made fully aware that his hand had been afflicting them in mercy for their spiritual good, they might well be said to kuow that God had been in the midst of them all the time as their own Lord God. 28. And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my Spirit upon all jiesli ; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions : 29. And also upon the servants and upon the hand- maids in those days will I pour out my Spirit. There can. be no doubt that this passage predicts the effusion of the Spirit in the gospel sense, and particularly, though not exclu- sively, in gospel times. That the specifications should point to the extraordinary rather than the ordinary operations of the Spirit, i. e., to visions, dreams, and prophetic functions, rather than to his more common, now more useful but less palpable ministries of convicting, converting, and sanctifying grace — has the same reason in prophecy that it had in the fact itself on the day of Pentecost, viz., the importance of having the Spirit's earlier manifestations made so tangible as to convince gainsayers and demonstrate his presence and power. "All flesh" must mean the whole race, without distinction of Jew or Gentile. This usage is fully estab- lished. In addition to the passages referred to in notes on v. 23, see Gen. 9 : 17 ; Num. IG : 22 ; Isaiah 06 : 23 ; Luke 3 : 6 ; and John 17 : 2. The specifications given here, " your sons and your daugh- ters," " your old men and your young men," " the servants and the handmaids," go to show that there shall also be no distinction of sex or age, of rank or station. As the gospel was to be preached to the poor, so the Spirit should come down upon servants and handmaids, as well as upon their employers, however rich and noble. It may also be intended that this spiritual illumination shall not be restricted to the orders of priests and prophets, but diffused through all grades and classes. The question 'WTien^ must not be overlooked. The only designation of time given here, " afterwards," in future time, was purposely left thus indefinite. The period before Christ and subsequent to Joel, is not necessarily excluded ; the early years of the Christian age are certainly in- cluded, as Peter shows (Acts 2 : 16-21) in his citation of this pas- sage as then having its fulfilment ; nor can the yet future periods of the gospel age be shut out. Indeed, numerous prophecies show that in the times yet future there shall be far richer manifestations of the Spmt's power than the world has yet seen. Nothing in prophecy, nothing in Peter's reference to Joel on the day of Pente- cost, forbids this belief. The connection of thought in which this 100 JOEL.— CHAP. II. propliecy stands has been already noticed. The great dcliveraiice wronglit for the covenant people on their repentance, by driving away the fearful locust army and by giving instead copious rains and superabundant harvests, suggested the far richer mercies of the divine Spirit. The nnderlying cause of both is the same — God's loving-kindness and great mercy. It is only in accordance with well-known laws of mind that one great blessing should suggest another yet greater. Finally, let us notice the favor shown by the Lord to the saints of that early age, in setting before them such glimpses of the better gospel days yet to come, and particularly such revelations of the future effusions of the Spirit. It must have ministered greatly to then* faith in God and to their hope and joy in his kingdom among men. 30. And I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smokB. 31. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LoKD come. Striking portents and prodigies shall precede the coming of " the great and terrible day of the Lord." The two main ques- tions here are (1) "Whether this language respecting the sun and moon shall be taken in a strictly literal or a figurative sense? and (2) Whether the reference is to some one great day only, and if so to what ? or whether the passage teaches or implies a general truth, viz., that portents shall appear prior to all the really great and sig- nal manifestations of the Lord's judgments on the wicked ? As to the first question, what is said of the sun and moon must be un- derstood of their appearance, and not of their reality. On the ^question whether these extraordinary things pertain to the realm of nature or the realm of society, I incline to decide for the former, and so far forth to give them a literal construction. That is, I do not favor the mode of interpretation which makes the sun and moon represent the greater and lesser kingdoms or princes of the world. The plagues on Egypt, prior to the great deliverance wrought for God's people, seem to have been before the prophet's mind as the case to furnish his Illustrative terms. And further, there seems to be a general expectation in the minds of men, in all ages, that God will give preintimations in the natural world of his special comings for judgment. To this point pagan writings fur- nish ample proof. As to the question whether this prophecy looks to one particular day alone, or rather announces a general doctrine, I suggest that the phraseology " the great and the terrible day " leads the mind specially to some one day, and yet the fact that this day shall be heralded by portents in nature may be only one striking case under a general law. If I am to look for the definite day, I cannot place it earlier than the destruction of Jeru- salem by the Eomans, as to which day the evidence of portents JOEL.-CIIAP. III. 101 and prodigies seems very strong. Beyond that I fix on no definite day. The future may reveal it. It may have its final and most stai'tling fulfilment shortly prior to the last great judgment day. 32. And it shall come to pass, that wliosoever shall call on tlie name of tlie Lord shall be delivered : for in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LoED hath said, and in the remnant whom the Loed shall call. In these times of terrible judgment on the incorrigibly guilty, some shall escape altogether. This verse informs us very definitely who they are, viz., those who " call on the name of the Lord," and those whom "the Lord shall call." Moreover, the deliverance shall be "in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem," i. e.^ for their inhabitants, for those who are the Lord's true people. "Calling on the name of the Lord " must be of and from the heart, since such salvation can be promised to no other. The primitive Christians were distin- guished as those who called on the name of Christ their Lord, as God ; and to this fact there may be here a prophetic allusion. The common mode of reaching the sense, however, is preferable; all those who heartily cry unto God for mercy and who cast themselves wholly on his grace. " The remnant whom the Lord shall call," are the same people, for they whom the Lord calls are brought to call on the Lord. In this very thing consists the efiiciency of God's call to them. It moves their hearts to call upon him in sincerity. Thus, in the severest judgments of the Lord on the wicked, salvation is sure to those who take hold of his promised mercy and grace, and call on him in sincere and humble prayer. His people find a sure and everlasting refuge beneath the wing of the same Power, whose uplifted arm comes down in vengeance on his foes. * CHAPTER III. The most vital and therefore the first step toward the exposi- tion of this chapter is, to determine the general principles of its in- terpretation. The choice lies between two methods. One of these is ably carried out by Dr. Henderson, who always leans strongly to a literal and specific construction. He bolds that the passage 2 : 28-82, is parenthetic, interposed between passages preceding and succeeding, both of which were fulfilled at least a century or more before Christ ; while this parenthetic clause carries us forward (for the moment only) to the times of Peter and the Pentecost ; that this third chapter returns again to the restoration from captivity in Baby- lon and to the destruction of Tyre, Zidon, &c., during the two or three centuries next subsequent to that restoration. He accounts it the main drift of the chapter to predict the retributive judgments 102 JOEL.— CHAP. ni. of God on those particular nations, and then to portray the conse- quent peace and prosperity of the Jews — all in the period prior to the Christian era. The other method makes the main drift and purpose of the chapter far more general and less specific in regard to the nations specially named in it ; finds here the general doctrine of God's retributive judgments in this world on nations and powers arrayed against his people and kingdom, and accounts the reference to Tyre, Zidon, and Philistia (vs. ^8), as rather parenthetic and il- lustrative of the general principle, than as constituting the main subject of the chapter. On this system it is not supposed that more is said of Tyre and Zidon than was true, not more than has been punctually fulfilled ; but it is held that the chapter looks far beyond the case of those nations, and teaches that the retri- bution which blighted them falls under the general law, serves to illustrate that law, and finds a place in this chapter for this reason, and not as being the leading theme. 1 adopt this last-named method of interpretation, and shall feel at liberty to present it with- out turning aside specially to controvert the other scheme. The relation of: this chapter to the first and second should be noticed. The locust army, and its attendant drought and conse- quent famine and distress, gave occasion to prayer, fasting, and peni- tence, and so opened the way for the signal extermination of that army, and for timely rains and superabundant harvests. These lesser gifts suggested the far greater gifts of the Spirit, the predic- tion of which constitutes the glory of the closing verses of the second chapter. But there remains yet another great lesson of moral truth, suggested by the extermination of the locust horde — a lesson hinted at (2 : 30, 31) in the allusion to " the great and terrible day of the Lord," but laid over for its special presentation in the third chapter, viz., the fearful and exterminating retribution which God will bring on all those nations and powers which per- sistently array themselves in arms against his kingdom and people. Hence this is the great theme of the chapter before us. It naturally closes with the resulting peace, prosperity, and purity of the res- cued and saved people of God. 1. For behold, in tliose days, and in tliat time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Jndah and Jerusa- lem, The first word, "For," indicates a close connection of thought between this chapter and the preceding. The prophet had said there should be "a great and terrible day of the Lord," so sweep- ing in the ruin it brings that none shall escape it but those who call upon the name of the Lord. Here, resuming this subject, he begins to give the reason, ^^For I wiU gather all nations," /. c, for trial and retribution. "Behold" calls special attention as to truths of momentous import. The time when, is indicated next, viz., when he shall interpose to redeem his people and bring them out of all their affliction. The phrase, " bring again the captivity JOEL.— CHAP. III. 103 of Judab andJerusalem," admits this general sense, as may be seen in Job 42 : 10, where it is said that "the Lord turned the captivity of Job "—of course, not in the specific sense of bringing him back from some captivity in a foreign land, but in the general one of bringing him out of a state of great afSiction. So, also, Ezekiel (16:53-55) speaks hypothetically of bringing again the captivity of Sodom and Samaria, but explains the sense by saying, " when Sodom and Samaria shall return to then* former estate." We are not, therefore, shut up to find the fulfilment of this chapter at the precise time of some actual restoration of Judah from a real cap- tivity under some hostile nation. The general sense is indeed more probable — When I shall turn my hand from afflicting to restoring and blessing my people, then will I visit retribution on all their foes. 2. I will also gather all nations, and will bring tliem down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Is- rael, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land. On this verse, the leading question is, whether this gathering of all nations is to be understood literally, or only as a figure for a general retribution ? Under this arises the question, whether the valley of Jehoshaphat, as thought of by Joel, was real, or only ideal ? ^In my opinion ideal only, for there is no proof that any actual valley was then known by this name. The name occurs no- where else in the Scriptures, applied to any valley. In later times (i. e., since the middle of the fourth century), the name has been given to the valley of the Kidron (in N". T., Oedron), which skirts Jerusalem on the east. With this modern application of the name is connected the current belief among Jews, Catholics, and Moham- medans, that the last judgment will be held in this valley. This fact goes far to show that the name Jehoshaphat was applied to this valley upon the mere supposition that Joel referred to it, and hence is modern only and not ancient^ and therefore affording no proof that Joel referred to this valley. On the other hand, the name is chosen because of its Hebrew significance — Jehovah judges — and a "valley " is thought of because in this hilly country valleys afford the only fit locations for convening a vast multitude. That the writer's mind is specially on the significance of the word Jehosha- phat (Jehovah judges), is more obvious in the Hebrew than in our English, since the verb rendered, "plead with," is from the same root. " I will bring them into the valley of the Lord''s judgment, and there will I judge them," i. e., hold court for their trial on the charge of scattering my people and dividing their land. The reader should also notice in tMs connection v. 12 : " Let the heathen be wakened and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat ; for there will I sit to judge all the heathen round about." The idea is that of a grand assize, a sublime court, held for the trial and condemna- 104 JOEL.— CHAP. m. tion of the whole heathen world, so far as they have been guilty of wrong and abuse against the known people of God. The description of this scene is continued, vs. 11, 13-16. The conception is very similar to that of the final judgment, as it ap- pears in the New Testament ; yet this day of Joel cannot be iden- tical with that, because here we have nations on trial ; there indi- viduals : here only those nations which have been known as enemies of the covenant people ; there all people of all time — the entire population of our earth. This takes place in time ; that only at the end of time^ as measured for this world by the great lights God has set in our heavens. Let it be considered yet further : — No valley, certainly not the one now called the valley of Jehosha- phat, could suffice for convening all the nations specially named in this chapter — to say nothing of the untold myriads really included under this general dcscripfion.* I am brought, then, by this mass of concurrent evidence, to adopt the ideal sense of "the valley of Jehoshaphat" — meaning any valley — any circumstances in which Jehovah judges guilty na- tions. The fact that he does judge tTiem^ and visit upon them retri- hution in time, is the thing taught ; — the place where, and its sur- roundings, are only the ideal drapery of the scene, designed to make the fact more tangible to the imagination. 3. And they have cast lots for my people; and have given a boy for a harlot, and sold a girl for wine, that they might drink. Here are more specifications in the indictment against these na- tions. They have not only scattered the chosen people among the nations and parted their land, but have cast lots over the captives (see traces of this usage in ancient times, Obadiah, v. 11, and Na- hum 3:10); and as showing both the wickedness of these conquer- ors, and the contempt they felt for their captives, they gave a boy for the temporary hire of a harlot, and sold a girl for one drink of wine. Is it strange that the heart of the great Father should take fire against such abominations ? 4. Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine ? will ye ren- der me a recompense ? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompense upon your own head ; * still further ; the Hebrews had one general term for a broad Talley* used here; applied also to the broad valley of Esdraelon, and to several others ; but never to the valley of the Kidron. They had another term,^ more specific, for a narrow gorge, the be^i of a winter torrent, which is commonly, if not universally, used for the gorge of the Kidron ; e.ff. 2 Sam. 15 : 23, and 1 Kings 2 : 37' and 15 : 13 ; Jer. 31 : 40. Thus Hebrew usage seems to forbid the reference of Joel to the gorge of the Kidron. ' prs) » bra JOEL.— CHAP. III. 105 " What have ye to do with me ? " fails to express quite clearly the exact sense. Better, and strictly literal is this : " What are yo to me, O Tyre ? " etc. What account do I make of you ? What reason have I to fear your petty wrath ? As the context goes on to say — Will ye think to rise against my scourging hand and wreak your vengeance on me, or on my people ? Will ye retaliate on me ? If ye attempt it, very speedily and swiftly will I hurl back your re- taliation upon your own heads. Of course, in this lofty strain, the Lord speaks after the manner of men, but as one conscious of Infinite power to punish his foes, and fully purposed to visit on them most ample and righteous retribution. As already intimat- ed in the introductory remarks upon this chapter, these nations, Tyre, Zidon, and Philistia, are named here, not as being the only nations involved in this gweat judgment, but as present to the minds of the prophet and of his first readers, and as fitting illustrations, therefore, of the great truths he would impress. 5. Because ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into yonr temples my goodly pleasant things. The silver and the gold which they had taken from Israel by robbery, the Lord calls his own — '"'"'my silver." Whatever of most costly value they could find they had borne into their own idol temples, as a trophy of conquest over the people of God, and the Lord remembers this against them ! 6. The childi-en also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye sold unto the Grecians, that ye might remove them far from their border. The captives they had taken from his people they had sold to the Grecians, in order to remove them far as possible from their homes, that they might never return. Y. Behold, I will raise them out of the place whither ye have sold them, and will return your recompense upon your own head. God will recover them notwithstanding, and will bring retribu- tion on their captors, who had held, or had sold them as slaves. 8. And I will sell your sons and your daughters into the land of the children of Judah, and they shall sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off: for the Loed hath spoken it. This retaliation in kind should perhaps be taken as a case of speaking after the manner of men, and not by any means as imply- ing that God can ever sanction the selling of men into slavery, or can authorize his people to do it, even in. retaliation for like offence 106 JOEL.— CHAP. III. and abuse. It should, however, be considered that God, in re- tributive justice and judgment on wicked nations, may, through his providential agencies, suifer other wicked nations to enslave them, without at all sanctioning as morally right their free acts in enslav- ing men. This distinction is one of vital moment in regard to God's providential agencies in his government over nations, and, in- deed, over individuals no less. When the Lord sends the scom'ge of war on a nation it will not follow that he accepts as morally right the ambition or the cruelty that instigated the aggressive power, nor does he make himself responsible for their moral acts, however he may permit their existence and providentially direct their blow. 9. Proclaim ye tliis among tli« Gentiles; Prepare war, wake up the mighty men, let all the men of war draw near ; let them come np ; 10. 'Beat yonr ploughshares into swords, and your prnning-hooks into spears : let the weak say, I am strong. Having finished the digression in respect to Tyre, etc., and the form of .retribution destined for them, the prophet now, speaking in behalf of the Almighty, daringly challenges the Gentile hosts to muster ,for the mighty conflict. The first word of the challenge, rendered "prepare" war, carries with it the idea of proclaiming war in the most solemn manner witli religious rites. It is the com- mon word for "sanctify," and means here — make this war a sacred thing; bind yourselves to it by solemn oaths, and invoke all your gods to your help. Beating ploughshares into swords reverses the long prayed for consummation when swords shall be beaten into ploughshares. The sense is — prepare for universal war. The im- plements on hand might suffice for any ordinary war, but not for this ; now you must needs arm every man, and hence you must convert even the tools of agriculture into weapons of war.— — Let the conscription be absolutely universal. Let no invalid plead ex- emption; "let even the weak say, I am strong." 11. Assemble yourselves, and come, all ye heathen, and gather yourselves together romid about: thither cause thy mighty ones to come down, O Loed. Then with striking beauty and force the prophet suddenly turns to the other party in the conflict: " Thither bring down thy mighty ones, Jehovah ! " How fearful is this great battle of earth now coming on ! 12. Let the heathen be wakened, and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat : for there will I sit to judge all the heathen round about. • See notes on v. 2. Observe also how quietly the strain of the JOEL.— CHAP. III. 107 passage assumes tliat this dread array of armed nations, vast as numbers- without number, and girded all for bloody war, results in no war at all. Their weapons amount to nothing ; they are there only for judgment — culprits before the King and Judge of the imi- verse ! They suddenly find themselves on no battle-ground, but summoned to the valley where Jehovah judges; and he comes down to take his lofty judgment throne, and " sit to judge all these nations round about." What quiet, unostentatious majesty! How does such real greatness eclipse all the assembled littleness of the gathered myriads of the heathen i 13. Put ye in the sickle, for tlie harvest is ripe : come, get you down ; for the press is full, the fats over- flow ; lor their wickedness is great. Here are symbols of terrific slaughter. — the sickle laying low the ripened grain, and the wine-v^ats full and trodden till they over- flow with wine — which in such a connection represents human blood. Dropping all figure, the reason is given in plain language — " For their wickedness is great " — not " tlie wickedness," in- definitely, but theirs^ the wickedness of these hostile nations. 14. Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision : for the day of the Lokd is near in the valley of decision. Their vast number strikes the prophet's mind, and prompts the exclamation, " O, the multitudes ! the multitudes in this valley of judgment ! " The word rendered " decision " means judgment in the sense of a final verdict which decides the criminal's destiny, past all reversal. See the usage of the original word, 1 Kings 29 : 40, and Isa. 10:22. This \s '■'■ tlie day oftJie Lord;'''' it comes ex- ceedingly near in this valley of judgment. The word "near" should not carry the mind onward to any other day beyond this. God is here, and his great day has come ! 15. The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdi-aw their shining. These figures must here take their usual sense — extreme calamity — casting the deep shades of night over all the hopes of the wicked — engulfing them in deep, impenetrable darkness. So in all languages, of every land or nation, darkness is the symbol of what- ever is most fearful to rational beings. 16. The LoED shall also roar out of Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem; and the heavens and the earth shall shake : but the Loed will he the hope of his people, and the strength of the children of Israel. In this strain of the boldest poetic imagery, the Lord becomes a lion, and his roar shakes the heavens and the earth. See the same figure under analogous circumstances, Jer. 25 : 30 ; Isa. 42 : 13. 108 JOEL.— CHAP. III. Tliis roar comes forth " out of Zion,^^ because there, in the deep recesses of the temple, Jehovah dwelt. Tliis was not only current and accepted Jewish opinion ; it was fact. His manifested presence was there ; and he was careful to impress this upon the hearts of the people. The "voice of the Lord," in such a con- nection as this, is thunder, as throughout Ps. 29. These figures, combined, give the climax of the dreadful scene, in which blended terror and majesty, justice and wrath, encircle and gird the throne of the Almighty round about, as, with the guilty nations, the op pressors of his people, assembled before him, he sits for judgment and final decision. Then, with inimitable beauty and force, turning to those on his right hand (may we not borrow from that other analogous scene ?) he says : " But the Lord will be the hope of his people, and the strength of the children of Israel." They may trust their God forever. He is their strength in every hour of their weakness. He stands for their deliverance, and for retri- bution on their foes. " Children of Israel " is here parallel to " his people," the latter, and consequently the former, including far more than the lineal seed of Abraham. 17. So sliaH je know that I am the Loed your God dwelling in Zion, my holy mountain : then shall Jeru- salem be holy, and there sliall no strangers pass through her any more. " So shall ye Icnoio " — know in your own case and by your own full experience of his saving power and loving heart, that he is Jehovah — forever the same ; that he " dwells in Zion," manifesting his presence, care, and love among his people forever ; and, what is more, making it his holy mountain by purifying his people there. '' Then shall Jerusalem be holy " — a statement which clearly identifies these events in their general character with those which close the second chapter of this prophet — the outpouring of the Spirit on the children of Zion first, and then on all flesh ; for cer- tainly, Jerusalem never becomes holy save under this great sancti- fying agency. "Strangers," foreign and alien in spirit, heathen, wicked men — shall not traverse the holy city any more — shall not come and go as if of her and having rights in her sanctuaries and palaces. No more shall such intruders defile the church of God. This betokens an eminent degree of real purity and holiness among God's people. 18. And it shall come to pass in that day, that the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters, and a fountain shall come forth of the house of the LoKD, and shall water the valley of Shittim. This description, looking somewhat to that ancient one of the goodly land as flowing with milk and honey, names earthly JOEL.— CHAP. III. 109 good, but manifestly means heavenly. Jewish costume and imagery are to be translated so as to give ns the fulness of gospel significance — the language of the material Canaan into the lan- guage of the spiritual, which is far better. The last clause strongly implies and demands this significance. " A fountain comes forth from the house of the Lord," w^here the institutions of rehgious instruction and worship are in power — " and it waters all the valley of Acacias,''^ this being the sense of the word " Shittim." And inasmuch as the oriental acacia enjoys the sterile valley, and puts forth its redeeming beauty and fragrance there where nothing else does, we find here the idea that the gospel turns barrenness to plenty, sterility to verdure, sin to holiness, and woe to bliss, all over this sin-wasted earth. Ezeldel's living waters (chap. 47), starting from the same source, flow into similar desola- tions, and produce a like result of health, beauty, and glory. 19. Egypt shall be a desolation, and Edom shall be a desolate wilderness, for the violence against the chil- dren of Judah, because they have shed innocent blood in their land. Prophecies that are alike millennial in their import differ in one respect among themselves, really falling into two classes. One class represents the whole world as radiant with light and glory, peace and love — the earth full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea (Isa. 11 : 9) : — "in every place incense offered to my name, and a pure offering" (Mai. 1 : 11) ; &c., &c. ; while another class (like the passage before us) still leaves on the picture some traces of the awful mischiefs sin has wrought. " Egypt is a desola- tion, and Edom a desolate wilderness," as if to heighten by con- trast the beauty and glory of the people and kingdom of the Lord. Pressed to its literal sense, it could only mean that some districts, most notoriously representing the persistent and sworn enemies of God's people, shall lie desolate, while all around them, even all else on the face of the earth, blooms in beauty and fertility. Those desolations lie in their ruins — like hell among the myriads of holy worlds — a swift and perpetual witness to the fearfulness of sinning against God, and to the certainty of woe to all sinners who will not repent. Egypt and Edom were the oldest national enemies of the covenant people. They are doomed because of their violence against Judah and the innocent blood they have shed in the Lord's land. 20. But Judah shall dwell for ever, and Jerusalem from generation to generation. 21. For I will cleanse their blood that I have not cleansed : ' for the Loed dwelleth in Zion. Judah shall be inhabited forever, dwelling in her places. This perpetuity aflimaed of Judah and Jerusalem, must certainly apply only to the real Judah — the true people of God. The Judah that was 110 JOEL.— CHAP. III. after the flesh and was of the flesh only, never can fill the sense of these precious words. See Notes on Hos. 1 : 10, 11, and also Dissertation II. in the Appendix. The word rendered " cleanse " means, to regard as innocent, and therefore to treat accord- ingly. This might imply either that God, at length, freely and fuUy forgives their sin and puts it forever away ; or that he avenges it upon her foes ; prohahly the former, at least ; possibly the latter • also. Both ideas are fully brought out in this chapter. It might well have been remarked ere this, that very much the same course of thought as appears in this chapter of Joel may be seen also in Isa. 66 : 14-24, and in Jer. 25 : 12-38 ; in Zech. 14 ; and in Ezekiel, chapters 87-48. — The passage in Joel, coupled with these just above noted, suggest this grave and truly momentous question — Whether the final conquest of the world by the Messiah will or will not bo effected in large measure by the destruction of incorrigible enemies. Are we authorized to expect a mingling of judgment and mercy among the agencies in this great conquest ; and if so, can we infer with any considerable accuracy the relative measure of each? or to put the case more precisely, the relative numbers of earth's popula- tion at that time, destroyed by judgments on the one hand, and saved by mercy on the other. This is not the place for an extend- ed discussion of this question. Let it suffice then to say that the tenor of prophecy as well as the genius of the gospel system, authorize us to expect the conversion of the world by means of those very gospel agencies which were employed and consecrated by Christ himself — the preaching of the gospel, the faithful testimony of his people, and the gift of his Spirit ; that the Lord has always carried along a coordinate work of retributive justice and judgment on the wicked in this world, sometimes more and sometimes less prominent ; that he may, to cut short the reign of Satan, intensify these agencies of retribution in the latter days ; that universally the underlying principle is, bow or break — repent, or be broken in pieces, so that the finally incorrigible may always know their certain doom. Hence we should not expect a definite revelation of the relative numbers of the saved on the one hand, or of the hardened and destroyed on the other. It is God's way to leave the principles of his moral government and his policy in its adminis- tration in such shape as will bring the most solemn and effective moral pressure to bear toward repentance and consequent salvation, liis problem is — judgment and mercy being given — so to arrange and mingle them as to persuade the greatest number to flee from the judgment and take hold of the mercy. Could he do better ? Thus ends this grand, sublime, and glorious chapter ! We might fitly apply these epithets to the whole book, for few more sublime compositions can anywhere be found, distinguished for conceptions so lofty, a style so pure, truths so vast, so far reaching, so vital to the moral government of God over nations, and so fraught with instniction to mankind. May the reader catch the inspiration of this admirable book, and drink deeply of its pure and healing waters ! AMOS Il^TRODUOTION'. Op the previous life of Amos before he became a prophet we le£*rn, from chapter 1 : 1, that he "was among the herdmen of Tekoa, and from 7 : 14, 15, that he was not born in the line of the prophets, but was " an herdman and a gatherer of sycamore fruifc," and that " the Lord took him as he was following the flock, and said to him, " Go, prophesy unto my people Israel." What the book itself thus states, its style, its choice of words and figures, and its numerous indica- tions of famiUarity with the scenes of husbandry, most abundantly confirm. His case, therefore, shows that the old dispensation as well as the new, honored the humble and laboring classes, and drew some at least of its most effective helpers from among " the poor of this world." Tbough a native and early resident of Judah, ("Tekoa" being within this kingdom), his prophetic mission was to the northern kingdom exclusively. In chapter 7 : 10-17 it ap- pears that he was then in Bethel, and had made that city his resi- dence. More than this is not known. His first verse fixes the date of his prophetic life within the reigns of TJzziah, king of Judah (b. 0. 811-759), and of Jeroboam, son of Joash, king of Israel (b. o. 825-784). How large a part of the sixty-six years, from the ac- cession of Jeroboam to the death of TJzziah, he was engaged in his prophetic work, is not said, nor whether his time lay nearer the close or the beginning of this period. There are good reasons for suppos- ing that he was somewhat later than Joel, but contemporary, during at least a part of his prophetic life, with Hosea, very probably ear- lier than the active years of Isaiah and Micah. He finds the same sins prevalent and calling for rebuke that Hosea found.- — His Ian- 112 AMOS.— CHAP. I. guage is less terse than that of Hosea, less sublime than that of Joel, but .yet by no means unworthy of a place among the noblest writings the world ever saw. His style is clear, forcible, and in some passages grand, particularly in his descriptions of the majesty and power of Jehovah. Commissioned especially to rebuke the sins of Israel, he yet in the first and second chapters denounces judgments on six other contiguous powers outside of Judah and Israel, and then upon these two in like general terms.*/ Then in chapters 3-6 he exposes and reproves in detail the sins of Israel, and threatens judgments therefor. — ey lay themselves down upon clothes laid to pledge by every altar, and they drink the wine of the condemned m the house of their god. 1,20 AMOS.— CHAP. 11. Last of all is Israel, the northern kingdom, to whom especially the prophet Amos was sent. It is remarkable that their chief sins, as here developed, lay in the line of immoralities against their fel- low-men: the violation of natural rights, the oppression of the poor, and dishonoring the law of chastity. This book of Amos discloses startHng facts in respect to the luxury of the wealthy, and their oppression of the poor. Note the particulars given here. " They sold the righteous for silver ; " good men, bearing God's image, and beloved of him for their moral integrity, they sold for paltry silver! Ought not the righteous Father of all to abhor tliis crime, and hurl his bolts of vengeance on the heads of such crim- inals? They "sold the poor for a pair of shoes," so cheap did they hold personal liberty and the rights of manhood! These " shoes " were only sandals, nothing but soles of leather or wood, fastened to the foot with straps ; of course very cheap. " That pant after the dust of the earth on the head of the poor : " so grasp- ing, so avaricious, so bent on extorting every thing the poor man had, if they saw a particle of dust settled upon his hatless head, they are represented as panting after it, as if they could have no rest till they had got it by extortion or by violence ! A pretty strong figure truly — but human depra\dty sometimes comes fully up to the sense of it ! Avarice not unfrequently becomes the ruling master passion of a man's soul, and then no sin is more likely to take on a development perfectly monstrous. It behooves men of avaricious tendencies to beware ! Some interpreters suppose the case thought of here is that of a poor man, robbed of all, throwing dust on his head in his grief over his loss, while his rapacious op- pressor grudges him even this poor dust ! To " turn aside the way of the meek " is to subvert justice in their case, and bar them from redress for their wrongs through the courts of law. The case of a man, his father, and the same maid, refers probably to the public prostitutes kept in the idol temples, such abominations being part of that system of unutterable pollution. The prophet says this was done to profane God's holy name, as if it were their set purpose to dishonor God and trample under their feet his blessed law of chastity. Eetaining over night the garments of the poor taken in pledge, was very expressly forbidden, Ex. 22 : 26, 27 : "If thou at all take thy neighbor's raiment to pledge, thou shalt deliver It to him by that the sun goeth down, for it is his covering only ; it is his raiment for his skin. Wherein shall he sleep ? And it shaU come to pass when he crietli unto me, that I will hear, for I am gracious." The poor in those countries had no bed-covering other than their outer garments. The Lord would not let the grip of avarice deprive the poor of their bed-covering. But these de- generate Israelites, instead of returning this bed-covering for the owner to sleep under, " laid themselves down upon clothes laid to pledge" ( i. c., as security for debts), and this "5y ^^'^^2/ «^^«^" in the very presence of their gods, and in their places of rehgious worship. Plainly their religion bore no testimony against out- AMOS.— CHAP. n. 121 rageons inlirimanitj. Any form of religion is practically rotten which bears no testimony or protest against hard-hearted cruelty to man. There is never a stronger proof of religious corruption than a cool and heartless mixing up of professed worship of God with remorse- less crime toward man. " To drink the wine of the condemned in the house of their God," is another sin of the same sort.* Lit- erally rendered, it is the wine of the 'amerced or taxed — the wine they had assessed upon their tenants or other poor, and by fraud or force compelled them unjustly to pay. This they have the im- piety to drink " in the house of their god," their religion having no testimony to bear to the conscience against crime toward fellow- men. 9. Yet destroyed I the Amorite before tliem, whose heiglit was like tlie lieiglit of the cedars, and he was strong as the oaks ; yet I destroyed his fruit from above, and his roots from beneath. Here the prophet turns to speak in the next three verses of what God had wrought for his people, that in the light of these great works of mercy they may see their more aggravated guilt. The Amorites, living of old on both sides of the Jordan, rep- resent the nations of Canaan. Physically, they were a gigantic race, and being proficient in the arts of war, they were exceedingly strong. So they appeared to the twelve spies whom Moses sent up from the wilderness of Paran. They reported: " The people be strong that dwell in the land, and the cities are walled and very great, and moreover we saw the children of Anak there." " All the people that we saw in it are men of great stature ; there we saw the giants ; and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight " (iTum. 13 : 28, 32, 33). The his- tory shows that God's interposition to drive out this powerful race before Israel, then altogether unused to war, was special. Ke promised early (Ex. 23 : 27-29), "I will send my fear before thee, and will destroy all the people unto whom thou shalt come. . . I will send Jiornets before thee who shall drive out the Oanaanites," (fee. See also Deut. 7: 20, and Josh. 24: 12. This hornet (so ren- dered) seems to Iiave been some form of scourge, perhaps a pesti- lence, as Hab. 3 : 5 would naturally imply. It was at least God's hand, manifested either in some physical scourge, or in mental panic, or in both, and designed to palsy their power and make them an easy conquest to God's chosen people. This Amos beautifully sets forth : " The Amorite, though in his early prowess as the height of the cedars and the strength of the oaks, yet God's hand destroyed his fruit above and his roots beneath." 10. Also I brought you up from the land of Egypt, and led you forty years through the wilderness, to possess the land of the Amorite. 122 AMOS.— CHAP. n. The scenes of the Exodus and of those forty years in the wilder- ness were full of divine care and love. Every day had its miracles of mercy. 11. And I raised up of your sons for prophets, and of your young men for IS"azarites. Is it not even thus, O ye children of Israel ? saith the Lokd. The order of prophets seems not to hai'e been specially provided for in the Mosaic institutes, but sprang up under the law of demand — the exigencies of later times. Eor the order of Nazarites, how- ever, special provision was made. (See Num. 6.) The persons com- posing this order were often set apart from their birth, e. g.^ Sam- son and Samuel. They were to abstain sacredly and specially from wine and from every thing else that could intoxicate, standing as living witnesses to the value of temperance and a perpetual protest against self-indulgence. It was truly a favor to the people that the Lord took his prophets and Nazarites from their own sons. We can suppose the case that the men for these orders should have been called in from other nations. This supposition Avould show at a glance how much better the social and general influence must be to take them from Hebrew families. Our translators and many commentators interpret the question at the close of the verse as the Lord's appeal to Israel to admit the fact that he had taken his prophets and Nazarites from among them. In my view, such an appeal can scarcely be deemed necessary, and is therefore very improbable. I prefer to read, " And is there nothing of this, O ye children of Israel ? " Is this a thing of no account ? — ^implying that it is a matter of great account. 12. But ye gave the I^azarites wine to drink ; and commanded the prophets, saying, Prophesy not. This fact evinces the daring impiety of the people. Tliey sought to fi'ustrate the benevolent aims of God in establishing both these classes of reformers. "Ye gave the Nazarites wine to drink" — seducing them into the violation of their vows, and thus paralyzing their influence. "Ye forbid the prophets to prophesy." In some cases, they persecuted, imprisoned, and murdere(? God's prophets, to suppress their testimony. Such a people must be fast filling up the measure of their iniquities. 13. Behold, I am pressed under you, as a cart is pressed that is full of sheaves. 14. Therefore the flight shall perish from the swift, and the strong shall not strengthen his force, neither shall the jnighty deliver himself : 16. JSTeither shall he stand that handleth the how ; and he that is swift of foot shall not deliver himself: neither shall he that rideth the horse deliver himself. AMOS.— CHAP. III. 123 16. And he that is courageous among tlie miglity sliall flee away naked in that day, saitli the Loed. Here the prophet announces divine jnclgments for these sins of the people. The received version — " I am pressed under you," &c., represents the Lord as the cart pressed by its burden of sheaves — with reference to the demand made upon liim for vengeance — Vv'hich demand his justice could not resist, nor could his mercy yield to it without strong pressure and keen anguish. This senti- ment may be very true, but it is probably not the truth taught here. The passage should rather be read — " Behold, I am pressing you down as a cart full of sheaves presseth down," i. e.^ whatever it passes over. The points in favor of this construction are (1.) That the verbs are not passive — " I am pressed," &c., but are strongly active, and even causative — "I am pressing you down '' — causing you to be pressed down. (2.) That the word "Behold," more naturally calls attention to the punishment God will inflict than to the state of his feelings in view of the necessity of inflicting it. (3.) And it makes the logic of the following verse far more forcible : — a people so pressed down as with a loaded cart upon them must lose all power of flight, even the swiftest of them ; the strong could have no force available under such a weight, &c. This logical con- nection of thought, expressed by " therefore " (v. 14), is more than lost by the rendering which assumes that the weight and burden of this pressure come down upon God rather than upon his sinning people. The idea that none can escape is reiterated with great force. The bowmen shall not stand ; the swift-footed shall not save even himself, nor he who has a fleet horse at command ; and finally, he who unites the utmost courage and the utmost strength shall only escape (if at all) naked, saving nothing but his person. The reader will readily notice that the figure belongs to husbandry, and is such as we might look for in one who was from boyhood " among the herdmen of Tekoa." CHAPTER III. This chapter continues the same strain, exposing the sins of the people, showing that the Almighty awakes to judgment against them, and calls his prophet to reveal the fearful truth. Foreign nations are summoned to witness the sins of Samaria, and again her doom is announced. 1. Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against yon, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I Lronght up from the land of Egypt, saying, 2. You only have I known of all the families of the earth : therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. 124: AMOS.— CHAP. III. It was tlie peculiar aggravation of the sins of Israel that God had Tcnown tliem as his own, and had blessed them only among all the nations, with abundant i-evelations of his will ; and that, not- withstanding all, they had persistently rebelled against him. There- fore, he would surely punish them for all their iniquities. The sins of other nations God might wink at and pass over with comparatively little notice ; the sins of Israel could not be passed over ! 3. Can two walk together, except they be agreed ? 4. Will a lion roar in the forest when he hath no prey ? will a young lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing ? 5. Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin is for him ? shall one take up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at all ? 6. Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid ? shall there be evil in a city, and the LoKD hath not done it f These spirited Interrogatives imply that God can go on no longer with his covenant people ; that the hour of his desolating judgments hastens on ; that for these judgments there is abundant cause in their sins ; and that the Lord has summoned his prophet to become his oracle of solemn warning to the guilty people. More particularly, I paraphrase thus : Can God and Israel walk together unless agreed in sympathy of purpose and character, as they are not now ? — AVill the Lord roar out of Zion in premonitory fore- shadowings of coming vengeance, when there is no prey to fall upon ? Can the people fall under war and captivity where no war is, and no captivity, and there is no wrath of God to fear ? Are these threatened judgments really nothing? Are not people wont to be afraid when they hear the clarion blast of war ? And shall they not fear as much now, before the awful blast of Jehovah's trumpet, calling out the nations to bring war on liis land ? Shall we not recognize God's agency as including and working all the inflictions of calamity that faU on guilty cities ? This "" evil in the city " which v. 6 "assames that the Lord has done, must be natural, not moral — calamity, not sin. The original Hebrew is used frequently for natural evil, e. j/.. Gen. 19 : 19 : "Lest some evil take me and I die;" and Gen. 44:34: "Lest peradventure I see the evil that shall come on my father ;" also Ex. 32 : 14. Besides, the strain of the whole passage is of natural evil — the judgments about to come from God on apostate and guilty Israel. To construe this evil, therefore, as being sin, and not calamity, is to ignore the whole current of thouglit, and to outrage the soundest, most vital laws of interpretation. Moreover, common justice towai-d God ft)rbids this construction — " Shall there be sin in the city, and the Lord hath not done it? " This would assume that God is the doer of all the sin in our world I AMOS.— CHAP. III. 125 7. Surely tlie Lord God will do nothing, but lie revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. 8. The lion hath roared, who will not fear ? the Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy ? The Lord is wont to forewarn his people by his prophets before he smites them with desolating judgments. This forewarning the prophet now gives, as v. 8 implies : " The lion hath roared." God has uttered his fearful note of warning as one about to smite ; who can refuse to prophesy when thus called to it of God ? The prophet means to say that in the presence of such demonstrations of coming judgments, he should bo not only false to God, but false to his countrymen, if ho did not solemnly announce God's message, and call them to repentance. 9. Publish in the palaces at Ashdod, and in the palaces in the land of Egypt, and say. Assemble your- selves upon the mountains of Samaria, and behold the great tumults in the midst thereof, and the oppressed in the midst thereof. This is a call to the people of Ashdod and Egypt, and, by implication, to all the nations named and doomed in the first two chapters, to convene upon the mountains that overlook Samaria, and be witnesses to her great tumults, disorders, and crimes, and to tlie oppressions done in the midst of her. Guilty as those nations are, they will see deeper guilt and more outrageous crime in Sama- ria. They are to be witnesses of her doom : let them first witness her sins. The word "oppressed" in the text, should bo "op- pressions," as in the margin. 10. For they know not to do right, saith the Lokd, who store up violence and robbery in their palaces. These are the people of Samaria. Despite of all the light of nature and the superadded liglit of divine revelation, they yet act as if they knew not how to do right. The trouble is not their ignorance, but their moral perverseness. Knowledge of duty does them no good: they will go on in sin as */* they had no moral sense — no knowledge of right. " They store up in their palaces " the fruits of their "violence and robbery" — the cause, violence, being put for the result — the property they wrest from, the poor and in- nocent. The frequent allusions to "palaces" imply that the wealtliy classes lived in luxury on the fruits of extortion and op- pression. 11. Therefore thus saith the Lord God ; An adversary > there shall he even round about the land ; and he shall bring down thy strength from thee, and thy palaces shall be spoiled. 126 AMOS. -CHAP. III. Tljere sliall come an enemy — one who shall pervade the whole land. He shall bring down ihj strength, and shall spoil thy palaces. The Assyrians were this enemy. The desolation they wTOught was complete, as the reader may see in 2 Kings 17. 12. Thus saithi the Lord: As the shepherd taketli out of the mouth of the lion two legs, or a piece of an ear : so shall the children of Israel be taken out that dwell in Samaria in the corner of a bed, and in Damascus in a couch. This figure, altogether natural for a shepherd-author, shows that nothing but the merest wrecks and fragments of that great and wealthy people would remain — only some of the aged, bed-ridden, or sick, overlooked in the general slaughter and deportation of cap- tives — here one in the corner of a bed ; there another on a couch. Some of the people might have fled to Damascus for refuge ; hence this reference to the few left there. The devastation would be most terrific and complete. 13. Hear ye, and testify in the house of Jacob, saith the Lord God, the God of hosts, 14. That, in the day that I shall visit the transgres- sions of Israel upon him; I will also visit the altars of Beth-el : and the horns of the altar shall be cut off, and fall to the ground. 15. And I will smite the winter-house with the sum- mer-house ; and the houses of ivory shall perish, and the great houses shall have an end, saith the Lokd. Yet another message indicates the point on which especially the judgments of the Almighty would fall, viz., on the idol altars of Bethel, and on the luxurious palaces of rich oppressors. God would direct his judgments so in the line of the sins scourged as to indi- cate those sins. He would show that his wrath burned especially against those idol altars, and those palaces built with the fruits of violence and wrong. "The horns of the altar ; " its projecting points at each of the four corners, were highly ornamented ; hence these especially should be smitten, to rebuke the pride of the people. " The houses of ivory " were those in which ivory was used for ornament. Only the w^ealthy could have one house for sum- mer and another for winter. The curse of extermination fell on Samaria mainly because her wealth was ill-gotten, and represented her cruel, iniquitous oppression of the poor and innocent. AMOS,— CHAP. IV. 127 CHAPTER ly, The prophet still addresses the proud, oppressive, but effeminate people of Samaria, descrlbincc them (v. 1) ; predicting their captivity (vs. 2, 3) ; in irony, bidding them go on in their sins (vs. 4, 5) ; recit- ing successive judgments from God — famine, drought, blasting, pes- tilence, and the overthrow of some of them even as Sodom — all, however, failing to bring them back to God (vs. 6-11) ; therefore the Almighty bids them prepare to meet him in his desolating judg- ments (vs. 12, 13). 1. Hear tliis word, ye kine of Bashan, tliat are in tlie mountain of Samaria, which oppress the poor, which crush the needy, which say to their masters, Bring, and let us drink. 2. The Lord God hath sworn by his holiness, that, lo, the days shall come upon you, that he will take you away with hooks, and your posterity with fish-hooks. 3. And ye shall go out at the breaches, every cow at that lohich is before her ; and ye shall cast them into the palace, saith the Lord. By the word " kine " (the nearly obsolete plural of cow) some sup- pose the luxurious and corrupt women of Samaria are meant. It is better to apply it to the same class hitherto spoken of, e. ^., 2 : 6-8, 11-16, and 3 : 9-15, i. e., the wealthy, proud, oppressive rulers and leaders in civil and social life, with no special reference to the fe- male sex : (1.) Because the description given of them here identifies them as tte same ; they oppress the poor, crush the needy, love strong drink, &c. (2.) Because these cows of Bashan are spoken of. in the Hebrew, now in the feminine and now in the mascuhne gender, as if the figure drew the writer to the feminine, but the fact to the masculine ; and (3.) Because he had special reasons for calling tie men " cows of Bashan," as we shall see. Concerning this figure — Bashan, a region on the east of Jordan, was renowned for its rich pastures and breeds of cattle, fine, fat, and strong. (See Deut. 33; 14; Ps. 22 : 12 ; Ezek. 39 : 18.) Especially the "bulls of Bashaa," as in David's reference (Ps. 22 : 12), were fat, strong, fear- less, ferocious : " Strong bulls of Bashan have beset me round." Perhaps with a tacit but cutting allusion to them, Amos meant to say—" Ye cows (not bulls) of Bashan, fat enough indeed and well- fed; fierce and cruel enough toward your helpless poor; but shamefully effeminate and coioarclly where real danger lies ; — hear ye uhese words ! The Lord is about to put his hook in your nose, and take you away to a hopeless captivity. Ye shall be driven out through the breaches made in your city walls, as a man drives out his cows through a gap in their fence — each cow straightforward, 128 AMOS.— CHAP. IV. i. e., with no option to turn to the right hand or to the left." This is the general course of thought in the first three veriBes. Spe- cially — (v. 1), ^'in the mountain" would be better on the moun- tain, with the figure in view— cows of Bashan, pasturing on the mountains of Samaria. " "Who say to their masters," the king — the plural being probably what is called '■'•pluralis excellentim^'''' — a plural form appropriated to one indi\ddual — (here a king) as a distinguished honor. " The Lord hath sworn by his holiness " — as if declaring solemnly — If I am holy ; if I abhor sin ; ly all my abhorrence of such outrages npon the innocent — ye shall be swept from your land ! " Taking them away with fish-hooks," should not lead onr thought to fishing for small game, but to the harpoon~ ing of sea-monsters, or rather, to the hook in the jaws of leviathan, or in the nose of fierce bullocks, as where the Lord said of the As- syrian king (Isa. 37 : 29), " I will put my hook in thy nose and turn thee back by the way by which thou camest ; " or of Pharaoh (Ezek. 29 : 4), " I will put hooks in thy jaws," &c., " and will bring thee up out of the midst of thy rivers ; " or (Job. 41 : 1, 2), " Canst tJiou draw out leviathan with a hook ? " Thou canst not ; but God can ! In v. 3, the clause — " Ye shall cast them into the palace " — should rather be read — " They " — the cows, alias the rich, proud oppressors of Samaria — " shall be cast out of the palace," driven rudely from the ivory mansions, made so splendid by the fruits of robbery and wrong. Thus the entire passage is keenly ironical and stinging. 4. Come to Beth-el and transgress : at Gilgal multi- ply transgression ; and bring your sacrifices e^ery morn- ing, and your titlies after three years : 5. And offer a sacrifice of thanksgiving with leaven, and proclaim and publish the free offerings*, for this liketh you, O ye children of Israel, saith the Loid God. These verses continue and even intensify the strain of irony. " Come to Bethel, and sin on, since so you like ; try it, if you will ! '' Bethel and Gilgal were places noted for idol worship. The Mosaic law required a sacrifice each morning ; tithes for the poor at the end of each third year (Dent. 14: 28, 29, and 26 : 12), thank- offerings, and free-will offerings also ; — but the people of Samaria mixed up these required ritual services with horrible idolatry and not less horrid immoralities — oppression, slavery, outrages on all the rights of the poor and the weak. Hence God abhorred them none the less for their religious rites. " This liketh you " — means in the original, this you like or love. 6. And I also have given you cleanness of teeth in all your cities, and want of bread in all your places : yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the Loed. 7. And also I have withholden the rain from you, AMOS.— CHAP. lY. 129 when there were yet three months to the harvest : and 1 caused it to rain upon one city, and cansed it not to rain upon another city : one piece was rained upon, and the piece whereupon it rained not withered. 8. So two or three cities wandered unto one city, to drink water ; but they were not satisfied : yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the Lord. 9. I have smitten you with blasting and mildew : when your gardens and your vineyards and your fig- trees and yom- olive-trees increased, the palmer-worm devoured them : yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the' Lord. 10. I have sent among you the pestilence after the manner of Egypt : your young men have I slain with the sword, and have taken away your horses ; and I have made the stink of your camps to come up unto your nostrils : yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the Lord. Here is a series of milder chastisements whicli the Lord had tried upon the people, but all in vain. The statement of each form of infliction closes with the same sad result — "Yet have ye not re- turned unto me, saith the Lord." They are enumerated in this way to show the people how long, how patiently, how sincerely, and with what varied appliances the Lord had labored to reclaim them, that they might themselves see the necessity laid on him to proceed to measures far more stern and fearful. " Cleanness of teeth " is identical with want of bread, famine. He had withheld rain, long before the maturing of the harvests, so that the harvest must have utterly failed. The middle clause of v. 9 might be read : " The multitude of your gardens and of yoar vineyards, also your fig-trees and olive-trees, the locust hath devoured." V. 10 seems to imply that when the young men were slain by the sword, their horses, left riderless, fell into the hands of the enemy and were taken captive — fit retribution for their vain trust in horses. A great slaughter had left many bodies unburied, to aggravate the pestilence ; but even this fearful scourge did not bring them back to God. 11. I have overthrown some of you, as God over- threw Sodom and Gomorrah, and ye were as a fire-brand plucked out of the burning : yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the Lord. Some of their cities had been laid desolate, even as Sodom and Gomorrah ; — by what precise agency is not said ; but the rest of 130 AMOS.— CHAP. IV. the nation raiglit ^tly regcard themselves as a brand plncked from the flames. These figures occur, Zech. 3 : 2, and 1 Cor. 2 : 15. Yet this most fearful scourge of all, which seemed almost to kindle the very lires of perdition upon them, failed to secure repentance. 12. Therefore, tliiis will I do unto thee, O Israel: and because I will do this unto thee, prepare to meet thj God, O Israel. " Therefore " implies that by the very necessities of his moral government, since all discipUne and chastisement fail, exterminat- ing judgments must come! The word " thus," which here raises the question, Bow will God deal with them? refers to the previous verses. The answer therefore is — As I have exterminated some of your cities, root and branch, even as Sodom and Gomorrah, so will I do to the whole nation. Because I have purposed to do this, I now give thee warning — "Prepare to meet .thy God! " Ye must meet him, coming with exterminating judgments ;*there is no es- cape ; therefore be in readiness ! The spirit of this announce- ment seems to be that the decree of judgment had gone forth, and its execution was fixed in the counsels of Heaven ; and yet this fact is declared, not with' the expectation that the masses will hear and repent, but rather in the hope that some individuals might ; and that it might stand as a warning to all other guilty nations in later times. It will be noticed that the primary sense of the passage relates to Israel as a nation, and had its fulfilment in the final desolation and captivity efl:ected by the Assyrian power as stated 2 Kings 17. But in principle ' it applies with even augmented force to all the in- corrigibly wicked, summoned to meet God in the final judgment- day. It warns them to be ready to meet him then and there, by tm'ning at once to become his friends and people. O might the wicked only be wise in time, and make the Great Judge their friend while they may, so freely and with such welcome ! 13. For, lo, he that formeth the mountains, and cre- ateth the wind, and declareth unto man what is his thought, that maketh the morning darkness, and tread- eth upon the high places of the earth. The Loed, The God of hosts, is his name. To give his readers some just sense of the majesty of that Being whom sinners of that and of every age must meet in judgment, he names a few of his mighty acts. The passage has scarcely a par- allel for its beauty and sublimity. TJie Creator must be indefi- nitely greater than his works; — but look at them — the mountains and the winds ; note how he can tell man all his thoughts ; how he can change the glory of the morning into darkness ; and with the majestic march of a God, tread upon the high places of the earth — Jehovah, God of the armies of heaven, his name : — then say — ^Is it well for thee to rouse his wrath to flame and then to fall before it ? AMOS— CHAP. V. 131 Can thy heart endure and thy hands he strong in so dread a con- flict ? Wilt thou persist in having this Almighty God thine enemy ? It is remarkable that though this chapter begins with caustic irony, yet it ends with the most tender, solemn warnings. IJence the irony is not malign, but is benevolent — used only for the befl^er moral effect — not for any satisfaction to bo found in inflicting a keen and cutting castigation. CHAPTER V. In this chapter the prophet laments the fall of Israel ; exhorts the people to seek the Lord ; portrays the glory and power of Je- hovah, as reasons why he should be both feared and sought ; re- bukes the sins of the people, and afiBrms God's abhorrence of the mere forms of worship without the heart and without justice and righteousness toward fellow-men. 1. Hear ye this word wliicli I take up against you, even a lamentation, O house of Israel. 2. The virgin of Israel is fallen ; she shall no more rise : she is forsaken upon her land : there is none to raise her up. This lamentation or elegy — a plaintive wail of grief — assumes forcibly that Israel is seen as one fallen, and her nationality extinct. She is compared to a maiden, now gone down to rise no more. "Forsaken upon her land" should rather be '''' prostrate vl^oq. her own land," with none to help her rise. 3. For thus saith the Lord God ; Tlie city that went out hy a thousand shall leave an hundred, and that which went forth hy an hundred shall leave ten, to the house of Israel. The glory of cities was graduated by thj3 number of men they could send out for war. The passage shows how fearfully their strength had departed. The city that once sent forth a thousand had now but a hundred left ; so that the house of Israel was shorn of its military strength. 4. For thus saith the Lord unto the house of Israel, Seek ye me, and ye shall live ; 5. But seek not Beth-el, nor enter into Gilgal, and pass not to Beer-sheba : for Gilgal shall surely go into captivity, and Beth-el shall come to nought. " Seeking the Lord " is returning to him in penitence and im- ploring his mercy. The promise — "thou shalt live" — usually 132 AMOS.— CHAP. V. covers something more and other than natural life, and, in the case of Israel, more than a prolonged nationality; it me^ns the richest blessings. Life is one of the most comprehensive and expressive tei^akin human language to denote blessedness — substantial good. " Seek not Bethel ; " i. e., the idol gods of Bethel. So Gilgal and Beersheba are not to be sought, considered as seats of idol-wor- ship. In the last clause the prophet fastens the thought in the mind of his Hebrew readers by a play upon his words. Gilgal, meaning the place of rolled-up heaps, shall be roUed away into captivity ; Bethel shall become Aven, nothing, void of any living thing. The word rendered " nought " is Aven. Bethel came to be frequently called Beth-aven, because it was desecrated by its idols. Here the sense is even stronger — house of nonentities, empty of even its senseless, powerless idols. Even they have gone and perished ! 6. Seek tlie Loed, and ye shall live ; lest lie break out like fire in the house of Joseph, and devoiir it, and there he none to quench it in Beth-el. A further reason for seeking Jehovah is, "lest he break forth like fire on the house of Joseph " — Joseph being another name for the northern* kingdom. The last clause, literally rendered, is ex- pressive : " And there be no quencher for Bethel " — ^no one to ex- tinguish the fires the Lord kindles upon her. 7. Ye who turn judgment to wormwood, and leave off righteousness in the earth, "Wormwood" is one of the most bitter of herbs — significantly put here for the grief felt by those who get only wrong and injury where they should have right and good. The passage describes those who wrest the cause of the innocent and pervert justice. The clause " leave off righteousness in the earth " is be.tter ren- dered, " who cast righteousness to the ground." The words im- ply also that they make it lie there — make that its resting-place — and allow it no practical sway in human afiairs. 8. Seeh him that maketh the seven stars and Orion, and turneth the shadow of death into the morning, and maketh the day dark with night : that calleth for the waters of the sea, and pom-eth them out upon the face of the earth : The Loud is his name : Men should seek God because he is so great and so glorious — has such power to turn our day to night, and our night to day — to bring up the waters of ocean by his call, and pour them forth as of old, in the deluge. The beauty and sublimity of this passage are exquisite. Job has a similar allusion to those brilhant constel lations (9 : 9). AMOS.— CHAP. V. 133 9. That strengthenetli tlie spoiled against tlie strong, SO tliat tlie spoiled shall come against the fortress. This magnificent description of the power of Jehovah closes with a word designed to make it more practical to the Samaritans who rehcd on the military strength of their capital — " "Who makes destruction flash out upon the mighty, and desolation shall como upon the strong city." The first verb, which I have rendered "flash out," takes its figure from the breaking forth of the dawn upon the darkness of the night — a figure which has most force in countries near the equator, where the twilight is short. The re- ceived translation fails to give the exact sense. 10. They hate him that rebuketh in the gate, and thej abhor him that speaketh uprightly. Again the prophet reverts to the reigning sin of the people. They love darkness and hate light, because their deeds are evil, and they are committed to wrong-doing. The "gate" was in that ago the court-house — the place where justice should reign, and sin be always rebuked. The people of Samaria hated the upright, honest judge, and whoever else should speak for righteousness. 11. Forasmuch therefore as your treading is upon the poor, and ye take from him burdens of wheat : ye have built houses of hewn stone, but ye shall not dwell in them ; ye have planted pleasant vineyards, but ye shall not drink wine of them. These "burdens of wheat " were cruel exactions in the form of rents or taxes, yet oppressive and unrighteous. For these sins of oppressing the poor, God wiU tear them away from their houses and vineyards. However much they may build the one and plant the other, he can frustrate their hope of enjoying them. It is hard fighting against God. No wisdom and no strength can withstand him. 12. For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins : they afflict the just, they take a bribe, and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right, " For I know that your transgressions are many, and your sins great." " The poor in the gate " are before the courts of justice. 13. Therefore the prudent shall keep silence in that time ; for it is an evil time. " The prudent " are the wise and good. They keep silence and forbear to .rebuke the sins of the age, because they see no hope of doing good thereby. They recognize God's awful presence to scourgo the people, and they bow before his manifestly righteous ways. 134: AMOS.— CHAP. V. 14. Seek good, and not evil, that je may live : and go the LoED, the God of hosts, shall be with you, as ye have spoken. " As ye have spoken " refers to tlieir professions of being the people of the Lord, and, as such, safe against harm from a heathen foe. The prophet says to them — " Seek good, and not evil ; " so the Lord of hosts shall be with you truly — as ye have been saying when it was not true. 15. Hate the evil, and love the good, and establish judgment in the gate : it may be that the Loed God of hosts will be gracious unto the remnant of Joseph. The phrase ''remnant of Joseph" imphes that the population was already greatly reduced in numbers, of which fact there is proof in 2 Kings 10 : 82, 83 : "In those days the Lord began to cut Israel short, and Hazael smote them in all the coasts of Israel." 16. Therefore, the Lord, the God of hosts, the Lord, saith thus ; Wailing shall he in all streets ; and they shall say in all the highways, Alas ! alas ! and they shall call the husbandmen to mourning, and such as are skilful of lamentation to wailing. 17. And in all vineyards shall te wailing : for I will pass through thee, saith the Lord. The prophet Amos is remarkable for the fulness and solemnity with which he uses the significant names of God. Here is an in- stance: "Jehovah, the God of hosts" (or celestial armies), "the Lord, saith thus," &c. The people at that time had a very imper- fect sense of the glory and majesty of the Lord their God. This grouping of his majestic names was therefore entirely appropriate, and had a most worthy object. In this passage the Lord seeks to impress the certainty of their impending doom by declaring that soon there shall be wailing through all the populous cities and the country. The " skilful of lamentation " were persons who made it their profession to sing or chant mournful dirges at funerals, or on other occasions of public sorrow. Eccles. 12:5 speaks of this class of persons as "going about the streets." Jer. 9 : 17-19 seems to show that women were specially employed in this service. This usage prevailed not only among the Ilebrews, but among the ancient Greeks, Eomans, Egyptians, and other nations also. God " will pass through " the land and among the people in such a way that they shaU feel his preisence and be made fearfully con- scious of his wrath. 18. "Woe unto you that desire the day of the Lord ! to what end is it for you 1 the day of the Lord is dark- ness, and not light. AMOS.— CHAP. V. 135 19. As if a man did flee from a lion, and a bear met him; or went into the house, and leaned his hand on the wall, and a serpent bit him. 20. Shall not the day of the Loed te darkness, and not light ? even very dark, and no brightness in it ? In their foolhardiness some had expressed their desire that this day of the Lord might come, madly daring Jehovah to do his worst. Upon them God denounces special woe. He asks — What will this day of the Lord he to you ? and answers — Only darkness, and not light ; no rays of light in it ; no mitigation to its horrors. Then, by two expressive figures, of a class natural to the mind of one trained in fields and deserts where wild beasts have their homes, he shows that to attempt to flee from God in any direction would be only to meet him there in a more fearful form. What else can any sane mind think of the daring impiety that challenges God to show his power to curse and punish, save that it is the veriest madness ? Do such men suppose they can cope with Omnipotence ? Do they assume that God's resources for making them feel the bit- terness of his strokes, are likely to be soon exhausted ? Or do they glory in rousing their puny souls to bravery and daring, as if it w^ere noble to measure strength with the Almighty ? Alas for the folly and the madness that sin begets ! 21. I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies. 22. Though ye offer me burnt-offerings and your meat-offerings, I will not accept them; neither will I regard the peace-offerings of your fat beasts. 23. Take thou away from me the noise of thy songs ; for I will not hear the melody of thy viols. The people were deluding themselves with the notion that they were high in favor with God, because they kept up the forms of the Mosaic worship. To dispel this delusion, the Lord solemnly pro- tests to them that He not only takes no pleasure in their worship, but thoroughly abhors it:- "I hate, I loathe your feast days.'' The practice of burning incense in worship for the sake of its sweet odors, led to the use of the verb to S7nell in this connection. It* may perhaps be as well to translate so as to give only the ultimate sense — I have no pleasure in your solemn assemblies.- The "peace-ofterings" are often called "thank-oiferings," a term which better expresses their significance — offerings of gratitude and thanks- giving. The word '•''noise'''' (v. 28) is highly expressive, showing that music with no heart in it is ovljnoise^ and never melody to the ear of God, a thought worthy of consideration in reference to the " service of sacred song " in our own times. ' If the Lord had a prophet Amos to send now into modern congregations, would ho 136 AMOS.— CHAP. V. not (sometimes) give Mm this very message ? The sentiment of these verses appears in several other prophets — in Hosea, as ^e have seen, 6 : 6, and 8 : 13, and 9:4; and Isa. 1 : 11-15. 24. But let judgment run down as waters, and right- eousness as a mighty stream. Tlie Lord asks them to reform, not their modes of worship, but their morals^ their monstrons wrongs and oppressions of their fel- low-men. Let judgment (in the sense of justice) flow freely, rolling on as water, smoothly and without obstruction ; and let righteous- ness be as a perennial stream. Some critics say perennial ; others say strong, powerful. Either is good sense, and the original bears either. A stream never dry, and never abating its flow, seems most in harmony with the scope of thought. How strongly does the word of God aflSrm and reiterate the doctrine that God repels the forms of worship, unless they are accompanied with an honest re- gard for our fellow-men ! He will never accept of worship profess- edly offered to himself, in place of duties due to man. This is truly like a father, to insist that we shall treat all his children well, as a condition of his accepting our worship of himself. No worship can be so costly or so imposing that it can supply the place of "loving our neighbor as ourself." 25. Have ye ofiered unto me sacrifices and ofierings in the wilderness forty years, O house of Israel ? 26. But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves. 27. Tlierefore will I cause you to go into captivity beyond Damascus, saith the Loed, whose name ts The God of hosts. This question assumes that the answer is affirmative. Ye did, indeed, i. e., your fathers, then living, did offer sacnfices in the wilderness; hut, ye also carried along your little idol images secretly, stealthily, all that time. The same spirit of idolatry has become far more rampant, open. Heaven-daring, in these later jtimes, for which I shall send you into capti\ity beyond Damascus. This is the general scope. The particular explanation of v. 26 has been found somewhat difficult. The quotation of it by Stephen (Acts 7 : 42, 43), made from the Septuagint version, shows some of these various opinions. The original words have been spelled and read differently; e. g., the Hebrew reading is Melek, which means king; the Septuagint is Moloch, an ancient idol. Some make Chiun a proper, others a common noun. None of these points of difference materially affect the general sense of the passage, which, beyond all doubt, means that the Israelites in the wilderness bore along with them little shrines and images of idol AMOS.— CHAP. YI. 137 gods, or of some of the planets. The Hebrew text might be rendered, "But ye bore the shrine of your king (meaning, yonr idol) and the little images of your idols, the star of your god, which ye made for yourselves." Tlie last clause implies that the images represented a star, and involved the worship of the planet Saturn. They supposed the planets to be animated, conscious and powerful, wielding a vast influence over human destiny. These ideas and usages they found and embraced in Egypt. Of their per- petual tendency to idol worship while in the wilderness, the history gives painful evidence, especially in the case of the golden calf (Ex. 82). In our passage it is assumed that, like Eachel in Jacob's family, some of the Hebrews, during those forty years, bore along their little idol shrines and worshipped them. The Jews were never thoroughly cured of their proclivities toward idols until their seventy years' captivity. The captivity of the ten tribes practically destroyed their nationality, and sunk them into oblivion, so that it cannot be known whether they ever abandoned their idol worship. CHAPTER YI. "Woes on cities and their chief men who can be at ease in their great sins, and in the very face of fearful j udgments from the Almighty ; further specifications of their sins of luxury, intemperance, and oppression; followed by announcements of yet more desolating judgments, fill up this chapter. 1. Woe to tliem that are at ease in Zion, and trust in the mountain of Samaria, which are named chief of the nations, to whom the house of Israel came ! The word Zion embraces Jerusalem and her leading minds, as, on the other hand, Samaria carries us to the chief city of the north- ern kingdom. The people of Samaria trusted in the natural strength of their position — on the mountains. " Judah and Israel were renowned as chief among the nations " of Western Asia. The clause " to whom the house of Israel came," refers to the leading men — princes, judges, and religious teachers, to whom the people came for justice in the courts, and to whom they looked for influence and direction. This woe came on them because of their great guilt, especially the guilt of being reckless in the midst of awful sin, and under God's revealed threatenings of exterminating judgments. For the responsible leading men to say practically in the face of such threatenings, What do we care f was fearfully provoking to the Most High, and must inevitably seal their doom. In every age sinners who scorn the warnings of Jehovah, and would fain be at ease in Zion despite of them, are near the point where judgments break forth and " there is no remedy ! " 138 AMOS.— CHAP. VI. •♦ 2. Pass ye unto Calneli, and see ; and from thence go ye to Hamatli the great : then go down to Gath of the Philistines : 1)6 they better than these kingdoms ? or their border greater than yonr border ? This verse connects itself in thought with tlie clause " which are named chief of the nations " (v. 1). The thought is — Judah and Israel have stood high among the nations of their time, in military power, in richness of country, and in the light of a true religion ; their responsibilities arc therefore the greater, and so much the more is their guilt in disowning and abusing the great Giver of their blessings. That they were truly renowned as first among the nations, any one may see by going (in thought) to those nations with whom the comparison should naturally be made. Pass thus over the Euphrates to Calneh (called Calno, Isaiah 10 : 9), on the east bank of the Tigris, and see ; from thence go to Hamath the great, on the Orontes, one of the great cities of Syria ; then go down to Gath of the Philistines : were they better than these two king- doms, Judah and Israel ? or had they a lai^ger and better territory ? 3. Ye that put far away the evil day, and cause the seat of violence to come near ; 4. That lie upon beds of ivory, and stretch them- selves upon their couclies, and eat the lambs out of the flock, and the calves out of the midst of the stall ; 6. That chant to the sound of the viol, and invent to themselves instruments of music, like David ; 6. That drink wine in bowls, and anoint themselves with the chief ointments : but they are not grieved for the affliction of, Joseph. Here is a rapid description of the social and moral life of the classes in question — the leading minds, especially in the kingdom of Israel. They "put far away the evil day," i. e., in thought, they assume it to be far distant, and they act as if it were; but the throne of violence — the bench of justice whence righteousness should proceed and violence never should — they cause to come near ; — the form of expression being antithetic to that in the first clause. They thrust the fear of danger from sin far away, and welcome near the worst forms of wrong, even legalized oppression, rolling in luxury, lounging in idleness, feasting on fatlings from flock and stall, chattering to the sound of the viol (where the word used by the prophet has a spice of irony and contempt) ; but they are fain to give themselves to music, as if nothing in their great guilt and near approaching doom should be allowed to trench on their hilarity; and to crown all, they drink wine by the. bowlful, and, anointing themselves with the richest oils, they think only of personal self-indulgence and never "grieve for the affliction of AMOS.— CHAP. VI. • 139 Josepli." Their country and the cause of their nation's God have no place in their hearts. This last clause, " they grieve not for the affliction of Joseph," is analogous to " being at ease in Zion," and shovv^s why the woes of God came down on Israel. They had no true s^ympathy with God or with his people. The name " Joseph " represents the kingdom of Israel considered especially as being the chosen people of God, and bearing his name before the nations ; yet may there not be, in the choice of this name, a tacit allusion to the original Joseph among his envious, heartless breth- ren, when they " saw the anguish of his soul, and he besought them, and they would not hear." Little did they heed the affliction of Joseph then ; alike heedless are the people of Samaria in tlie days of this prophet. Hence the righteous woe, so soon to- fall upon them. 7. Therefore, now shall they go captive with the first that go captive, and the banquet of them that stretched themselves shall be removed. As the men of wealth and high standing have been foremost in oppressing the poor and wresting the cause of the meek ; foremost also in luxury, self-indulgence, and recklessness of the cause of God : so they shall be first among the captives, heading the sad procession ; and the banquet of those who lay stretched out around (in beastly drunkenness, we must suppose), shall be quite broken up. (The Lord has no special tenderness toward this beastly sin!) 8. The Lord God hath sworn by himself, saitli the Lord the God of hosts, I abhor the excellency of Jacob, and hate his palaces: therefore will I deliver np the city with all that is therein. Note the solemn reiteration of the names of God in this case, in which, since " he can swear by no greater, he swears by him- self." The things so solemnly affirmed are two: (1.) That " God abhors the excellency of Jacob," &c. ; (2.) That he will abandon the city and all its inhabitants to destruction. The " excellency of Jacob " has been alluded to in this chapter ; see v. 1, " chief of the nations," and v. 2, " better than other adjacent kingdoms ; " — this excellency being mainly thought of as lying in its natural ad- vantages. The same sense must be the primary one here, the more so because connected with " his palaces ; " but the reason why God has come to abhor and hate a noble country, once flowing with milk and honey, and the glory of all lands, lies in the guilt, and es- pecially the pride of its people. To this there seems to be a tacit allusion in the very phrase, " the excellency of Jacob," since this word in Hebrew is used for pride^ as well as for naturally excellent qualities. The sense then, here, is that the pride and moral corrup- tion of the people were so monstrous and so intrinsically hateful to God, that he abhorred the very country for their sake, and must 140 AMOS.— CHAP. VI. spoil its fair beauty and consign it to long and blank desolation. And there tlie land of Palestine lies to-day — as yet, not half recov- ered from this fearful curse ! 9. And it shall come to pass, if there remain ten men in one house, that they shall die. 10. And a man's uncle shall take him up, and he that burneth him, to bring out the bones out of the house, and shall say unto him that is by the sides of the house. Is there yet amj with thee % and he shall say, IS^o. Then shall he say, Hold thy tongue : for we may not make mention of the name of the Lokd. To show how utter would be the destruction of its inhabitants, the prophet gives some particulars for illustration. If only a small number, say ten (a definite number for an indefinite), remain in one house, even they shall all die. And when a man's uncle (or other friend), together with him whose office it shall be to burn the corpse, bring out a dead body, and finding one poor invalid in some corner or closet of the house, shall ask him, " Is there another dead man here ? " he shall say, " No more ; " and then shall add, " Hush ! for we may not make mention of the name of the Lord." This last phrase — " make mention of the name of the Lord " — usually signifies, to speak of God in grateful, appropriate acknowledgment, and due honor. See Josh. 23 : 7, where this is forbidden in reference to false gods ; also Ps. 20 : 7, and Isa. 62 : 6. Precisely what this prohibi- tion meant in this case is not certain ; perhaps it indicates such a sense of the awfulness of God's presence in this scourge upon the land that guilty men could not endure to hear his name ! 11. For, behold, the Lord commandeth, and he will smite the great house with breaches, and the little house with clefts. All the houses, great or little, ehall be smitten ; the great shat- tered to pieces, as the Hebrew word implies ; the little ones rent with clefts. Oppressors, enriched by wrong, are remembered be- fore God in this day of judgment. 12. Shall horses run upon the rock ? will one plough there with oxen ? for ye have tm-ned judgment into gall, and the fruit of righteousness into hemlock : These questions put cases, not of extreme difficulty so much as of practical impossibility, and aim to illustrate the futility and ab- surdity of those vain reliances which have kept up the spirits of the people. They had been hoping to repel their foreign enemies and withstand the threatened judgments of the Almighty. He hints to them that they might as well plough the rock with oxen, or run horses npon the precipitous cliffs of their mountain glens. Why AMOS.— CHAP. VI. 141 could they not escape ? Why could they not resist Jehovah's wrath ? Because they "had turned judgment into gall" — that which is always sweet to good men into the most bitter draught — "and the fruit of righteousness" — righteous judicial decisions — "into the poison hemlock." Such perversions of justice had insured Jeho- vah's wrath. "What a lesson of warning against American slave- holding! See a hke form of expression, Hos. 10 : 4, and Amos 5:7. 13. Ye wMcli rejoice in a thing of nought, which say, Have we not taken to ns horns by our own strength ? They had trusted joyfully in what could avail them nought,, but must prove a thing of no power to save — a mere nothing. They had said, "Have we not taken to ourselves horns (always an em- blem of power) by our own strength ? " iJ^ot the least recognition of God as their strength appears, but, on the contrary, every word indicates 'the purest self-conceit, and the pride of self-made help. Such "pride goeth before destruction," just a httle way only, be- fore ! 14. But behold, I will raise up against you a nation, O house of Israel, saith the Lord the God of hosts ; and they shall afflict you from the entering in of Hamath unto the river of the wilderness. This prediction almost names the Assyrian power — manifestly means it. God raised them, up ; they came, and did indeed lay the land desolate " from the entering in of Hamath" — a very common phrase for their northern border, and a natural thoroughfare out- ward to Hamath — "unto the river of the wilderness." This name, " the wilderness " — in Hebrew, Arabah — with the article, is applied in the Scriptures to the great valley of the Jordan, the Lake Genes- saret (in Heb. Cinneroth), and the Dead Sea. In later times, the name Arabah has been specially given to the extension of this valley southward, from the Dead Sea to the Elanitic Gulf. But in the earlier ages, it was currently given to the portion north of the Dead Sea, and usually translated in our English version, " the plain." The exceptions are Deut. 11 : 30, "champaign," and Josh. 18 : 18, " Ai-abah." See other passages — " the plain," Deut. 3 : 17, and 4: 49 ; Josh. 3 : 16, and 8 : 14, and 11 : 2, 16, and 12 : 1, 3 ; 2 Kings 14: 25, and 25 : 4, 5, &c. This wonderful valley was one of the natural boundaries of the kingdom. 142 AMOS.— CHAP. Vn. OHAPTEK YII. This chapter records three successive visions, shown to the prophet, each indicating the judgments impending over the land (vs. 1-9) ; then an attempt made by Amaziah, an idol priest of Bethel, to prevent Amos from prophesying more in Bethel, and to send him back into Judah ; with the defence made by Amos, and the response made by the Lord (vs. 10-17). 1. Tliiis liatli the Lord God shewed unto me ; and behold, he fonned grasshoppers in the beginning of the shooting np of the latter growth ; and lo, it was the latter growth after the Idng^ mowings. That this is a vision presented to the spiritual eye of the prophet, is indicated by the language — "Thus did the Lord God show me," i. e., cause me to see. He saw the Lord forming grasshoppers. Tliey were young, but fast coming forward for their work of destruction ; and he saw God's hand in them. The time was just when the meadows were putting forwai'd their second growth — the after-math. The phrase, "the king's mowings," is supposed to allude to a claim of the king to have a part, at least, of the first growth of the meadows. 2. And it came to pass, that when they had made an end of eating the grass of the land, then I said, O Lord God, forgive, I beseech thee: by whom shall Jacob arise ? for he is small. After he had seen them eat the last of the grass of the land, he prayed that the Lord would forgive the sin for which this scourge was sent, and used this plea: "By whom else shall Jacob arise," i. «., stand, live ; " for he is weak " and without strength against God, and against such agents of destruction as these. 3^ The LoKD repented for this : It shall not be, saith the Lord. The Lord heard his prayer and changed his purpose, sparing tho land the judgments which this \'ision portended. A clear and strik- ing case of prevailing prayer, even when God's purpose to destroy was not only formed, but made knovni. What the precise form of this judgment would have been, is not certain. The grass- hoppers, being seen only in vision, may have been symbolic of some other form of judgment, even as the fire in the next verse mani- festly must have been. Amos does not say here, as Joel did, that actual grasshoppers came up over the land, visible to all the people, and thrilling all hearts with fear and dread. 4. Thns hath the Lord God shewed mito- me : and, AMOS.— CHAP. vn. 14-3 behold, tlie Lord God called to contend by fire, and it devoured tlie great deep, and did eat np a part. 6. Then said I, O Lord God, cease, I beseech thee: by whom shall Jacob arise ? for he is smj^l. 6. The LoED repented for this : This also shall not be, saith the Lord God. In the second vision lie heard the Lord calhng for the action of fire. The original words imply a controversy, or legal judicial issue by fire, probably only in the general sense of a judgment on the people for their sins. Appalling to behold, this fire seemed to de- vour the great deep, and to eat up the dry land also. The original word rendered "« part " is supposed to have here this sense — not that it ate up a part of the great deep, but ate up the dry land. The previous clause, using the same verb, affirms that it had eaten up the great deep already. Of course I construe this as a vision, and symbolic of some all-consuming desolation, doubtless by war and conquest. Again the prophet prays, but not in this case as before — "forgive" — which, if answered, would have averted the judgment ; but, " desist ; " cut short this judgment ; let it be arrested midway. He uses the same plea as before, in the same words ; and the Lord answered to the precise extent of his request. He desisted, after the judgment had run a part of its course. The scourge of war and indeed of captivity came, but probably witli the less severity because of the prophet's prevailing prayer. These cases, as thus recorded, must have been designed of God to encourage his people to come before him with most importunate prayer that he would avert, eitlier in part or wholly, the judgments which he seemed about to inflict on a guilty people. T. Tims he shewed me : and behold, the Loed stood upon a wall made by a plumb-line, with a plumb-line in his hand. 8. And the Loed said unto me, Amos, what seest thou ? And I said, A plumb-line. Then said the Loed, Behold, I will set a plumb-line in the midst of my people Israel : I will not again pass by them any more : 9. And the high places of Isaac shall be desolate, and the sanctuaries of Israel shall be laid waste : and I will rise against the house of Jeroboam with the sword. The third vision will be better understood if wo consider that the prophets speak of a measuring line as marking off for destroy- ing as well as for creating; for casting down, no less than forbuild- ingup. (See 2 Kings 21^: 13, and Isa. 34 : 11, and Lara.- 2 : 8.) So here, this plumb-line evinces the moral obliquity of the people and their consequent fitness for destruction. God will not any more jtass ly them, but will take them in hand for scourging and for ruin. 14A AMOS.— CHAP. VII. The "high places of Isaac" were those elevated sites so con- stantly chosen for idol temples and idol worship. The "sanctuaries of Israel " were their idol temples and shrines. These were doomed to utter destruction, and at least by implication the whole land as well. The "hou^e of Jeroboam" the Lord would cut off by the sword. He did so ; Shallum (2 Kings 15 : 10) conspired against Zachariah, son and successor of Jeroboam, and thus ended the royal line of his house. It should be noted that in this third vision nothing is said of the prophet's interceding by prayer for the removal or even the mitigation of this judgment. He saw that it was most righteously deserved, and fully fixed in the counsels of Jehovah, and therefore he forebore to press any plea for its reversal. Essen- tially the same answer must be given to the question — Why did he pray '■''/orgive''^ in reference to the first threatened judgment, and only ^'- desist '''' upon the second? "The secret of the Lord is with them- that fear him." The conditions of acceptable prayer being fully met on our part, the Lord, on his part, will lead our minds in prayer, aiding us thus to ask for those things, and only those, which he is pleased to grant. 10. Then Amaziali tlie priest of Beth-el sent to Jero- boam king of Israel, saying, Amos has conspired against thee in the midst of the house of Israel : the land is not able to bear all his words. . 11. For thus Amos saith, Jeroboam shall die by the Bword, and Israel shall surely be led away captive out of their own land. 12. Also, Amaziah said unto Amos, O thou seer, go flee thee away into the land of Judali, and there eat bread, and prophesy there : 13. But prophesy not again any more at Beth-el : for it is the king's chapel, and it is the king's court. This historical sketch (vs. 10-17) presents no difficulties that re- quire exposition. Amaziah, " tlie priest of Bethel," was probably the high priest before the golden calf located there, for there must have been other priests as well. The history of Elijah (1 Kings 18) gives us some facts respecting the number of idol priests. The charge of treason against the king and the state was often brought against the Lord's faithful prophets, and constituted one of their serious embarrassments and trials. It seems that Jeroboam did not think best to interfere with the Lord's prophet. Amaziah there- fore resorted to a private effort (vs. 12, 13) to get Amos out of the kingdom. Judah, said he, is a better place for you ; the prophets ot tho Lord get a good living there ; there you can be quiet and fulfil your prophetic function, if so you choose : but be off and away from Bethel, for these idol temples are the king's sanctuary — the place where he worships, and tho house of his kingdom (so the AMOS.— CHAP. VII. 14-5 Hebrew reads), and it implies that, in tlieir notion, these heathen gods were the patrons of the kingdom, and their favor vital to its permanence and prosperity. Hence they would very naturally arraign the Lord's true prophets for high treason, whenever they dared. 14. Then answered Amos, and said to Amaziah, I was no prophet, neither was I a prophet^s son ; but I was an herdman, and a gatherer of sycamore fruit : 15. And the Loed took me as I followed the flock, and the Loed said unto me, Go, prophesy unto my peo- ple Israel. Amos first gives his own personal defence. With beautiful sim- plicity he replies : " I was no prophet ; I did not come up unto this profession because my father was a prophet before me ; but I was earning my bread by honest labor when the Lord took me from following the flock, and said — ' Go, prophesy unto my people Is- rael ' — not JudaJi^ as you propose, but Israel. How could I do otherwise than obey this divine mandate ? " 16. ISTow, therefore, hear thou the word of the Loed : Thou sayest. Prophesy not against Israel, and drop not thy word against the house of Isaac. 17. Therefore thus saith the Loed ; Thy wife shall be an harlot in the city, and thy sons and thy daughters shall fall by the sword, and thy land shall be divided by line ; and thou shalt die in a polluted land : and Israel shall surely go into captivity forth of his land. The rest of his reply comes directly from the Lord himself. Thou hast forbidden me to prophesy against Israel ; for this impiety the Lord reveals to thee thy doom — thy wife a harlot in the city; thy sons and daughters falling by the sword ; thy landed estates divided by line to others ; thou thyself shall die in a foreign and so in a polluted land, and the nation shall be carried away into cap- tivity — a fearful warning against interfering with the divine mis- sion of God's faithful prophets ! The Hebrews regarded all other lands compared with their own as polluted. Hence they naturally desired to make their graves in the holy land. This captivity was to Assyria, effected by Tiglath-Pileser b. o. 722, or sixty-two years after the death of this Jeroboam. 140 AMOS.— CHAP. vm. CHAPTEE YIII. Tni9 chapter opens with the last vision in this series of fonr (vs. 1, 2), which is followed by farther details of the great and damning sins of the people, and of the terrible judgments then im- pending. 1. Thus hath the Lord God shewed unto me : and behold a basket of summer fruit. 2. And he said, Amos, what seest thou? And I said, A basket of summer fruit. Then said the Loed unto me. The end is come upon my people of Israel ; 1 will not again pass by them any more. Summer fruit ripens quick and soon decays. The people had ripened for ruin, and their ruin was near at hand. The latter of these two ideas seems rather more prominent than the former ; perhaps both are implied. The special idea is that the end is come to the nation of Israel. God can pass by them, sparing them and deferring his judgments, no longer. 3. And the songs of the temple shall be bowlings in that day, saith the Lord God : there shall he many dead bodies in every place ; they shall cast them forth with silence. Since the time of David, songs had formed a part of the temple worship. In the dark and sad day just at hand, those songs should become bowlings — the wails of agony. The original is concise : " The songs of the temple shall wail in that day." The last half of the verse Dr. Henderson translates with graphic power : ** The carcasses are many ! Throw them out anywhere ! Hush!" This is a close translation of the Hebrew, except that the verb tlirow is not imperative, but indicative — " men do throw them out anywhere." The last word " hush " should be compared with Amos 6 : 10, where the word is the same, and the sentiment also, doubtless, the same. Some suppose this injunction to silence looks toward their danger from the invading foe, it being such that they could not bury their beloved and honored dead with safety, save in secrecy and silence. Perhaps so; but the passage (6:10) favors another view, viz., that an appalling sense of the presence and wrath of God awed every heart into silence. 4. Hear this, O ye that swallow up the needy, even to make the poor of the land to fail. AMOS.— CHAP. VIII. 14Y 5. Saying, When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn ? and the sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit ? 6. That we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes ; yea^ and sell the refuse of the wheat % The guiltj people are once more exhorted to hear the threat- ened judgments of the Almighty, and the recital of those judgments is prefaced by a further description of their oppressions of the poor. In this passage, as in 2 : 6-8, these oppressions stand as the crown- ing, damning sin — that which filled to the brim the cup of their iniquity. " Swallow up the needy," exhibits the same verb that is rendered (chap. 2:7) " that 'pant after the dust of the earth on the head of the poor." It might more precisely be rendered here — " that pant after the poor," even to make the needy of the land cease altogether, i. e., to annihilate them so that none should remain. So eager are they to drive hard bargains, and wrest from the poor the last pittance of their earnings, they cannot wait for the new moon and for the Sabbath to pass over — so would they hurry off their religious duties to get back, again to their extortion and fraud. Their religion stood in the way of their sin in no other respect than that it demanded a few hours' suspension of trade and business. It utterly failed of its proper influence, viz., to make their heart thoroughly benevolent, and, consequently, their business-life just. -It would seem that these tradesmen bought by the shekel and sold by the ephah. So they perverted their measures and weights to subserve the ends of fraud. They made false balances for deceit. Yet further, they drive their fraudulent trade to get money in order to buy the poor for slaves, cheapening even tlieir price, so that they could get a poor man or a poor boy for a pair of sandals, which are of much less value than American shoes. And one thing more, they sell as merchantable the refuse of the wheat — the light, half-filled grains. Y/hat a depth of corruption in morals do such sketches of the ways of business and trade re- veal ! The reader will be careful to note how sharply the Lord rebukes and exposes such outrages on human rights and on com- mercial justice, and how fearfully he punishes the guilty. 1. The LoED hath sworn by the excellency of Jacob, Surely I will never forget any of their works. Here begins the message which (in v. 4.) the people were ex- horted to hear. It opens with a most solemn asseveration, the oath of the Almighty. " The excellency of Jacob " cannot well mean here any quality or thing that Jacob possessed — not his moral qualities, not his goodly land — ^but it must refer to and describe Jehovah himself. He was " the excellency of Jacob " in the sense 148 AMOS.— CHAP. VIII. of being his most glorious "portion," his richest treasure ; that in which Jacob should more exult and rejoice than in all things else. Comparing this passage with Amos 6 : 8, where the Lord says, " I abhor the excellencj of Jacob," the diiference is that there the phrase refers to the glorious land and country of Jacob which the people did account their chief glory, as they should not ; Tiere^ to their covenant-keeping God whom they ought to have ac- counted their chief glory, but did not. The object in using this one phrase in these two diiferent senses may have been to make this contrast palpable. It is by no means uncommon for Jehovah to swear by himself. Paul (Heb. 6 : 13) intimates the reason to be that he can swear by none greater — by nothing else so solemn. As to the form of this oath, it is very common in Hebrew, but not often retained in om* English translation : " If I shall ever forget any of their works " — where the full force would be express- ed by filling out the sentence — then I am not God. A very strong emphasis on the word if suffices, however, to express the sense. God will not lose from his memory one of the least of all thel? doings. All shall come up again for judgment. 8. Sliall not the land tremble for tliis, and every one mourn that dwelleth therein ? and it shall rise np wholly as a flood; and it shall be cast out and drowned, as l)y the flood of Egypt. The tone of awful earnestness, manifest in this oath of Jehovah, should lead us to expect appalling judgments, in hearing which, all ears should tingle. The prophet compares the convulsions that shall shake the land to an earthquake, and represents this earth- quake as heaving up the land, even as the Nile lifts up its waters in its annual inundations. The verse might be paraphrased thus : "For this, shall not the land tremble as in an earthquake, and every dweller therein mourn, when the whole land rises up as the Nile, and rolls to and fro, and then subsides like the river of Egypt after its mighty inundations ? " Of the two words rendered "cast out," and "drowned," the first must mean, driven and tossed, as impelled by mighty forces; and the second, subsiding again, when the moving force is spent. The ultimate thought is, that convulsions shake and rock the kingdom of Israel, and finally sweep it away into the gulf of ruin. 9. And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord GrOD, that I will cause the sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the earth in the clear day : This is the usual figure for great calamity. The last clause reads literally — "I will darken tlie light to the earth in the day- time." The actual thing indicated by these figures should not be looked for in the natural but in the political and moral world. (See Joel 3: 15 and 2: 31.) AMOS.— CHAP. VIII. 149 10. And I will turn your feasts into mourning, and all your songs into lamentation ; and I will bring up sackclotli upon all loins, and baldness upon every bead ; and I will make it as the mom-ning of an only son^ and tbe end tbereof as a bitter day. These are tlie tokens of grief common among tlic people of the East in all ages. 11. Beliold, tbe days come, saitb tbe Lord God, tbat I will send a famine in tbe land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of bearing tbe words of tbe Lord : 12. And tbey shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to tbe east ; tbey shall run to and fro to seek tbe word of tbe Lord, and shall not find it. 13. In tbat day shall the fair virgins and young men faint for thirst. In their deep calamity, their ideas and feelings in regard to messages from the Lord hy his servants, will utterly change. Whereas they had made light of these messages when they had them — even scorning the word of God and misusing his prophets — now, the Lord having withdrawn and trouble having come on, they are in tlie horrors of a great famine of the words of the Lord. They long for some word from him, and wander over the whole land in vain to find a prophet. Like Saul after the Lord had forsaken him, they say — " I am sore distressed ; God is departed from me, and answereth me no more, neither by prophet nor by dreams" (1 Sam. 28 : 15). This was one of the prophet's last appeals to the people to give heed to the words of the Lord while they had them. 14. They that swear by the sin of Samaria, and say. Thy god, O Dan, liveth ; and, Tbe manner of Beer-sbeba livetb ; even they shall fall, and never rise up again. The " sin of Samaria " is here idol gods. One of Jeroboam's calves was put up in Dan, the extreme northern limit of the king- dom. The " manner of Becrsheba " means first the ways of idol worship practised there, and next, the idol gods themselves, which is the sense here. The form of the oath might be better ex- pressed— " As thy God, O Dan, liveth;" or, " By the life of thy god, O Dan ;" and so of the god Beersheba. All who have had such reverence for these infamous gods as to swear by them shall fall, never to rise again. 150 AMOS.— CHAP. IX. CHAPTER IX. This cliapter opens with the fifth and last special vision shown the prophet : atfirms the complete destruction of the guilty, apos- tate people of Israel ; denies in vivid forms all possibility of their escape (vs. 1-T, 10), yet promises the rescue of a small remnant (vs. 8, 9) ; predicts the raising up of the fallen tent of David, and the saving of the true^ Israel for an era of extraordinary and long-con- tinued prosperity.* 1. I saw tlie Lord standing upon tlie altar : and lie said, Smite the lintel of the door, that the posts may shake : and ent them in the head all of them ; and I will slay the last of them with the sword: he thatfleeth of them shall not flee away, and he that escapeth of them shall not be delivered. In the outset, a question arises respecting the altar referred to here, the decision of which affects the interpretation of the chapter fundamentally. Some, with Dr. Henderson, take it to he the idol altar at Bethel, and adduce the following reasons for this view : (1.) The reference (8 : 14), immediately preceding, to the utter and final fall of the worshippers of those idols, showing that this sub- ject was in mind; (2.) That Amos (3 : 14) affirms this very thing — " In the day that I shall visit the transgressions of Israel upon him, I will also visit the altars of Bethel, and the horns of the altar shall be cut off and fall to the ground ; " (3.) The fit- ness of this fact in itself, and in aU its relations; (4.) That Hosea, under the same circumstances, distinctly predicts that God will break down those altars and spoil their images (Hos. 10: 2, 5, 8). Others, including Dr. Hengstenberg, Rosenmuller, and Calvin, take it to mean the altar of burnt-offering at Jerusalem. I adopt this opinion decidedly, for the following reasons : (1.) This,^ and this only, is fhe altar — the one to be thought of when we have' nothing else to determine the sense except this emphatic definite article. (2.) The idol altar was not, to the same extent, the promi- nent thing at Bethel. The calf, the god himself, was much more prominent. (3.) The scope of this chapter, and more especially from V. 8 to the close, contemplates Judah and Jerusalem, as well as Samaria, Bethel, and the northern kingdom ; e. g.^ v. 7, " brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt ; " v. 8, " the house of Jacob," and V. 9, " the house of Israel," who are spoken of as " my people," V. 10; "the tent of David," v. 11; "my people of Israel," v. 14. (4.) The allusions, v. 11, and especially the use of the plural num- ber, are thought to refer to both kingdoms: "In that day will I raise up the tent of David that is fallen (looking, perhaps, in part to the crushing down of the temple, as in this v. 1), and will wall up AMOS.— CHAP. IX. 151 tJieiT (not its) breaches " — the breaches of both krogtloms, and " I will raise up Ms ruins," those of David, and " I -will build it " — the tent — "as in days of old." The two points of argument last made (Nos. 3 and 4) offset the consideration that most of the book of Amos relates to the northern kingdom. That is freely admitted, yet when the Lord reaches, in this last chapter, the revelations of mercy, the phraseology embraces the southern as well as the north- ern kingdom ; or rather that temporary distinction is lost sight of, and we have the earlier Israel of the times of the Exodus and of David. In this point of view "we go back also to the great altar at Jerusalem. (5.) But more than all is the argument from the scope and course of thought. To see this in its full force, we must look lirst at the fact that the people of the northern kingdom, though fearfully apostate from God into idol-worship, yet kept up some of the forms of the Mosaic system, and manifestly depended upon God's protection and favor on this account. See the evidence, chap. 4 : 4, 5 : " Bring your sacrifices every morning, your tithes after three years, your thank-offerings and your free-offerings " — where the sense is, Bring them if you will, and rely on them for salvation if you will; they can avail you nothing. Also 5:14, 18-26: *' Seek good and not evil ; so the Lord shall be with you as ye have said ; " i. e., they had said the Lord would be with them, because of their religious worship. The prophet replies, " God will be with you then, and only then, when you seek good and do right." Y. 18 shows that they did not fear but even dared the coming of the day of the Lord — ^manifestly through their vain confidence in his favor. Hence he solemnly affirms, " I hate, I despise your feast- days; I will not accept your burnt-offerings," &c. The whole con- nection here shows that the Lord would fain annul their vain reli- ance on the mere forma of ceremonial worship for the salvation of their country. With this fact in mind, let us come to our verse (9 : 1). I para- phrase it thus : " I saw the Lord standing beside the great altar of burnt-offering in Jerusalem, and he said, ' Smite the capitals of the columns, and make the very thresholds tremble, and dash them in pieces upon the heads of all the people within, and the remtlant of them I will slay with the sword ; whoever flees shall not escape, and he that gets away shall not be finally delivered.' " In this vision the people are supposed to be assembled in the temple for safety against the judgments of God, but he comes down with his destroying angel and orders the whole temple to be crushed down from pinnacle to basement, that it may fall crashing upon the heads of the assembled throng. Then, whom the falling temple does not crush, the sword shall slay, and none shall escape. The context in the next three verses confirms this view of the general course of thought in this passage, as we shall see. This vision of the temple crushed down upon the heads of those who had fled to it for refuge against the judgments of God, is alto- gether in harmony with Amos G : 8 : — " The Lord hath sworn by 152 AMOS.— CHAP. IX. himself, I abhor the excellency of Jacob, and hate his palaces." See Notes on the passage. The whole heart of the Holy One revolts at the idea that his temple should be made a hiding-place and sanctuary of refuge for hypocrites so foul, apostates so guilty and so Heaven-provoking; and as he abhors their goodly land because of the sins of the people, and will not spare it for its natural beauty, so neither will he spare its goodly temple. 2. Thougli they dig into hell, thence shall mine hand take them ; though they climb up to heaven, thence will I bring them down : 3. And though they hide themselves in the top of Carmel, I will search and take them out thence ; and though they be hid from my sight in the bottom of the sea, thence will I command the serpent, and he shall bite them : 4. And though they go into captivity before their enemies, thence will I command the sword, and it shall slay them : and I wiU set mine eyes upon them for evil, and not for good. The aim throughout these verses is to deny all possibility of escape. It is not essential to the fitness or the force of these supposed cases that they should be actually possible. The affirma- tion is that if they were so, and ?[/" men should hide there, it should avail them nothing. There is no escape from the Almighty by any expedient, possible or even supposable. " The top of Carmel " is suggested as a place to hide one's self, both because of its numerous caves and thick undergrowths, and because, lying adjacent to the Mediterranean, it naturally stood in contrast with the bottom of the sea. " Going into captivity " presupposes that their lives are at first spared ; but even the rights of prisoners of war should not save them from death. 5. And the Lord God of hosts is he that toucheth the land, and it shall melt, and all that dwell therein shall mourn : and it shall rise up wholly like a flood ; and be drowned, as hy the flood of Egypt. 6. It is he that buildeth his stories in the heaven, and hath founded his troop in the earth ; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth : the Loed is his name. These bold descriptions of Jehovah's power over the material world are adduced here in the same line of thought with the pre- ceding — to show how hopelessly futile must be every attempt of guilty men to evade his scourge or escape his retributions. The AMOS.— CHAP. IX. 153 manner of the original is graphic : " And the Lord Jehovali of Hosts — he is touching the earth, and then it melts, and all the dwellers in it monrn ; its whole surface is lifted np like the rising Nile, and then subsides as the river of Egypt (the effects of an earthquake, as in Amos 8 : 8). He builds his chambers in the heavens ; he has founded his arched vault upon the earth (^. e. the blue concave firmament). He calls for the waters of the sea, and then pours them out upon the face of the earth — Jehovah, his name." What our translators meant by "troop" is not clear. The original word refers to the apparently arched concave above us, which the Hebrews thought and spoke of as solid, " the firmament," and its pillars or lower edges as resting upon the earth. T. Are ye not as children of tlie Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the Loed. Have I not brought np Israel out of the land of Egypt % and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syi^ians from Kir ? This verse aims to confront and demolish another delusive reliance of the apostate people, \nz., that, being the seed of Abraham and children of the covenant, brought by a series of miracles into the land of promise, they were invincible against any heathen power, since their God would surely protect them. The Lord replies to their thought — " "What are ye to me more than the Cushites and Ethiopians ? I did indeed bring you up out of Egypt ; so I also brought the Philistines from Caphtor (Crete), and the Syrians from Kir " — the region of the river Cyrus. Does such a removal insure the perpetual prosperity of any people ? Can it save you from being removed again, far beyond Damascus ? (See Amos 5 : 27.) The Ethiopians, or Cushites, originally holding central Arabia, were removed to the interior of Africa. 8. Behold the eyes of the Lord God are upon the sinful kingdom, and I will destroy it from off the face face of the earth ; saving that I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob, saith the Loed. The phrase " sinful kingdom " leads the mind to the kingdom of the ten tribes, that being at this period far more corrupt than Judah. The sentence "I will destroy, it from the face of the earth," had special reference to the ten tribes. The excepting clause, " saving that I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob," raises the question whether the saved were of the ten tribes, or of Judah only. On this point, the statements in. this verse are not altogether explicit : v. 9 favors the hope that some from the ten tribes were plucked from utter ruin; v. 10 shows that all the sinners — all who were past repentance and reform — would be cut off by the sword. 9. For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house V* 151 AMOS.— CHAR IX. of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet sliall not the least grain fall npon tlie earth. It would seem that " the house of Israel," as used in this verse, must he a different class from " the sinful kingdom," named in v. 8, and from "the sinners of my people," spoken of in v. 10. The latter, he says, " shall be destroyed " (v. 8) ; " shaU die by the sword " (v. 10); but the former, though sifted fine and far among the nations, shall none of them be lost. They are the precious grain, and God's eye is on them to save them and to use them for his own purpose, as his eye is also on the sinful kingdom to destroy it from the face of the earth. The "house of Israel," therefore, must in- clude here only the real people of God, " faithful found among the faithless;" the same whom, considered as captives, he will restore, as said below. The word rendered " the least grain " is thought by Hengstenberg to mean a bundle, or any thing bound up. This is the almost universal sense of the word. Its meaning here would be essentially as in 1 Sam. 25 : 29 : "-Men rise up to per- secute and to seek thy soul ; but the soul of my Lord is bound in the bundle of the living by the Lord thy God." So in our passage with this sense of the word, the house of Israel are bound up in the bundle of life by the Lord himself, and cannot be lost in the sifting process of discipline by dispersion among the nations. If we might give the word the sense — a small grain — the ultimate meaning would be much the same. 10. All the sinners of my people shall die by the sword, which say, The evil shall not overtake or prevent us. The sense here must be — "All the sinners out of or among my people" — the sinners being one class and God's people another. Tlie sinners shall die— the judgment of God being the fearfully sifting process. The description given of them evinces their vain self-confidence. The evils threatened by the prophets of the Lord, they are sure, will neither overtake them from behind, nor come in ahead of them from before. " Prevent " has usually in our Bible that ancient, now obsolete sense, of getting in advance, coming in ahead to intercept and confront an adversary. Vain self-confi- dence never saves ; it only hastens and aggravates destruction. 11. In that day will I raise np the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close np the breaches thereof; and I will raise np his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old : The point of time indicated by " in that day," is not definite. It looks into that future period when discipline shall have wi-ought its desired result and the fulness of the Lord's time of mercy shall have come. The "tent'' or booth " of David "—not his royal palace, Avhich would indicate prosperity and strength— but his AMOS.— CHAP. IX. 155 reduced and Immble dwelling, a booth of tree-bonghs, and even this fallen down, God will now raise up. The reigning family of David had been sadly broken down by the revolt under Jeroboam ; far more so still by their apostasy into idol-worship, oppression, and other immoralities, for all which God had doomed the sinners of his people to be utterly cut off; but the day will come for rear- ing up again this royal line and its kingdom. He will wall np the breaches" of the "double house," the two kingdoms (for so the plural pronoun, rendered " thereof," should naturally mean) : " I will raise up David's ruins and build his tent as in days of old." These promises suggest the original covenant with David's line (2 Sam. 7 : 16). " And thy house and thy kingdom shall be established forever before thee ; thy throne shall be established forever." King Messiah is to come in this royal line, and, according to the strain of this prophecy, events ripen for his. coming. Only in him can this prophecy find an adequate fulfilment. 12. Tliat tliey may possess tlie remnant of Edom, and of all the heathen which are called by my name, Baith the Loed that doeth this. The "remnant of Edom" reminds us that in chap. 1 : 11, 12, we saw Edom doomed to sore judgments, almost exterminating, be- cause of his relentless hostility to his brother Jacob's race. Kow the revived and rebuilt house of David shall possess what is left of Edom. There may also be a tacit allusion to the fact that the literal David himself subdued the Edomites and made them tributary, and that they took advantage of the breaches in David's tents— *in other words, the weakness induced by the revolt and by the great sins of the covenant people — to throw off this yoke. David's line, having returned to God and to consequent prosperity and power, shall again possess what remains of Edom. And not of Edom alone, but of all the heathen over whom God's name is called, for so saith the Lord who bringeth to pass these promised events. The calling of God's name over a person or people is not an empty ceremony, but a most significant fact. It implies their consecration to his love and service. Thus it was said concerning Israel — Deut. 28 : 9, 10 : " The Lord shall establish thee an holy people unto him- self," &c., "and all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord," hterally rendered, " that the name of the Lord hath been called over or upon thee," and consequently that thou art the people of God, and the object of his protecting care and love. To the same purport is Dan. 9 : 18, 19, "O Lord, behold the city over which thy name is called " — " for thy city and thy people are called by thy name." In this most interesting sense God's name has been called over the gentile nations. This is the great fact affinned in this passage. May it not be that Isaiah, in nearly the same words, means the same thing (54 : 5) ? " The God of the whole earth shall he be called," i. c., "his name shall be called over or upon it all." Another mode of expressing essen- 156 AMOS.— CHAP. IX tially the same tiling is this — " They " — the royal seed of David — "shall possess" (inherit) "the remnant of Edom and of all the heathen." Precisely this Isaiah afSrms — " Thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles " (54 : 3). Yet furtlier, let us not lose sight of the idea that this calling of the name of God over these heathen nations, and this inheriting or possession of the Gentiles by the royal seed of David, must all be understood, not in the worldly but in the gospel sense. Israel takes possession of the gentile nations, only in the name of her King Messiah ; only by preaching to them his gospel, reveahng to them his love, and taking their hearts captive for him by the power of his cross. We must think of no other conquest, no other form of possession, but this. ^Finally, let us revert to the quotation of these verses (11, 12) by the Apostle James (Acts 15 : 14-17) in his speech before the great council at Je- rusalem. He began with saying, " Simon Peter has been relating to you how God has visited the Gentiles to convert some of them to himself; and to this agree the words of the prophet Amos ;" and then he quotes substantially from the Septuagint version these two verses. His quotations differ from the Hebrew chiefly in read- ing "the residue of men," instead of "the remnant of Edom." The Hebrew reader will readily see the resemblance between "Edom" and "Adam" — which was specially close when the Hebrew was written without the vowels. Yet James gives the general sense with entire accuracy, viz., that God had of set pur- pose called the Gentiles within the pale of his church, to inherit in it among his people. 13. Beliold, the days come, saitli tlie Loed, that the ploughman shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes him that soweth seed ; and the mountains shall di'op sweet wine, and all the hills shall melt. 14. And I will bring again the captivity of my peo- ple of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities, and inhabit them / and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof; they shall also make gardens, and eat the fruit of them. 15. And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land which I have given them, saith the Lokd thy God. Here let us first note the sense of particular words and phrases. " Days come," looks forward to the remote and indefinite fu- ture. The manner of calling attention to the matters revealed in these last three verses, " Beliold^^'' coupled with the change from "in that day" (v. 11), to " days come" (v. 13), imply that these lat- ter events lie onward in the future, beyond those recorded (vs. 11, 12). " The ploughman overtaking the reaper," &c., implies great prosperity and abundance. The reaper will have so much to do, AMOS.— CHAP. IX. 157 and the plonghmnn withal is so eap:er to got in readiness a large field, tliat he treads on the heels of the reaper. The mountains terraced and cultivated in grapes to their summits shall seem to dis- til new wine. It flows down their declivities as if the mountains themselves were becoming liquid. To " bring again their captiv- ity " always implies good and not evil — ^promised blessings and not threatened calamities. It is also used in a broader and more gen- eral sense than that of bringing captives home to their own land. How this came to pass may be seen in the history of the Hebrews as related to Canaan. In all those ages of promise, prior to their possession of Canaan under Joshua, " to inherit the land," to pos- sess the land of promise, was the consummation of hope, the thing of most earnest desire. " The meek shall inherit the land," shows the significance of this phraseology. In later times, after cap- tivity in foreign lands had been their sad experience, the phrases " bring again their captivity," and " plant them again in their own land," superseded the former phrase in a like sense of general pros- perity. Cases that both illustrate and prove this figurative use of th^ phrase " to bring or turn again the captivity," may be seen (Job 42 : 10), " And the Lord turned the captivity of Job," but Job had been in no captivity in the literal sense. The Lord changed his state by a change analogous to that from bondage to freedom. Also Ezek. 16 : 53, 55, " When I shall bring again the captivity of Sodom and her daughters," &c., but the trouble with Sodom was not a real captkity. This term is used here figuratively for another calamity worse than that. The precise sense of the phrase is given in a clause explanatory (v. 55), " When thy sister Sodom and her daughters shall return to their former estate." These cases will suffice to establish the usage which I have assumed. Let us be- ware lest we stop in the letter and miss the spirit of this prophecy. So doing, we shall find in it only a Mohammedan paradise, and God surely intended something far richer and better than that. We shall greatly err if in reading this passage we think only of great harvests, hills running down with wine, and the people of Israel restored again and forevermore to Palestine. The construction we are compelled to put on the two verses next preceding forbids this. The sense given to those verses by the Apostle James, viz., the call- ing of the Gentiles into the gospel faith, forbids it. It would be a sad faUing off if, borne along by the whole current of thought in this ninth chapter, and especially in verses 11, 12, we should begin to rejoice in the glory of gospel salvation, spreading widely over all the Gentile world, and then, in these last three verses, should reach the climax by dropping down to Judaism, and find none but sensual ideas, luxurious harvests, plenty of good wine, and the land of Palestine held forever by the Jews. The current strain of all the gospel prophecies forbids this construction. Amos himself would rebuke us ! He would say. How could you forget that, be- ing myself a husbandman frorti my youth, I ought to be allowed to draw my figures and illustrations from things with which I had 158 AMOS.— CHAP. IX. ■ been all my life familiar ? Had yon not noticed this same thing throughout my book ? And could you not learn to distinguish be- tween the drapery and the person clothed in it — between the cos- tume and the inward reality ? Yes, thou lovely, venerable prophet of the Lord, we will not torture thy figures of speech into sensu- alities that never came into thy mind ! "We will try to see in this rich imagery of nature the glorious and munificent things of gospel times. We will not impute to thee the inconsistency of denoun- cing the woes of God on men " at ease in Zion," because they " drink wine in bowls " (6 : 6), and then representing the saints of God as finding their highest spiritual life and glory in vineyards, grapes, and wine ! I cannot close this book of Amos without a passing tribute to his clear, forcible, and earnest style ; to the richness of his figures, dra"wn chiefly from the familiar but often sublimely grand, fields of nature, and from the scenes of husbandry ; to the sublime and sol- emn grandeur with which he recites the significant names of Je- hovah, God of hosts ; and not least, to his warm sympathy with the wronged and outraged poor, and to his intense abhorrence tf the luxury, pride, ostentation, and especially the ojjpression which manifestly was the crowning and damning sin of the leading men in the kingdom of Israel. We shall need to go far to find keener invectives against these Heaven-provoking sins, or a more earnest wielding of Jehovah's thunders against the oppression of the poor, the perversions of justice, and the enslaving of men. WeU, in- deed, had it been, if during the past hundred years, our American churches had drank deeply of the spirit of Amos, the herdman- prophet, and had given heed to the burning words against oppress- ion which God spake through his lips ! Then had our American Christianity never stricken hands with the oppressor ! American systematized oppression would have been throttled in its cradle, and the woes of the great war of rebellion under which the nation has bled and groaned need never have been! It may be noted that Amos, like Hosea and Joel, closes with an outlook from the lofty heights of the mount of Vision into that goodly land of Prom- ise, yet mostly future, when " the earth shall be full of the knowl- edge of the Lord," when his kingdom and people shall possess the world, and all its tribes and kingdoms shall become tlie kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ that he may reign forever and ever. OBADIAH INTKODUOTION. Of the author of this shortest book in the Bible, we have the briefest possible account. His name was Obadiah — there the rec- ord ends. The book contains historical (not prophetic) allusions to the capture and destruction of Jerusalem by the Chaldeans and the consequent captivity, and therefore must have been written subse- quent to that event, yet how long after cannot be certainly deter- mined by any evidence external or internal. The tone of the pas- sage (vs. 11-14) implies that those events connected with the fall of Jerusalem were then recent. The name, Obadiah, meaning " servant of the Lord," occurs frequently in the Hebrew genealo- gies, and several times in Bible history. The author of this book was not the Obadiah who stood up so nobly for the Lord under that wicked Ahab (1 Kings 18 : 3, 4, 7, 16), nor that other Obadiah who was employed by Jehoshaphat to teach religious duty (2 Chron. 17 : Y). "We must be content to know but little of his personal history. His subject is one — a prophecy concerning Edom. The poster- ity of Esau, otherwise called Edom, founded this kingdom at a very early period. They manifestly had their land under cultivation before the Hebrews entered Canaan. They appear repeatedly in the scenes of Jewish history during the reign of David, and more especially after the revolt. The early antipathy which brouglit Esau out with four hundred armed men to intercept Jacob on his return from Padanaram to Canaan, though sometimes kept down under the pressure of conscious inability to do his brother harai, 160 OBADIAH.— CHAP. I. yet seems never to have been fully suppressed. As said by Amos (1: 11), "be cast off all pity, and bis anger did tear perpetually, and be nursed bis wratb forever." Tbis enduring batred seized its opportunity wben Jerusalem fell before tbe Cbaldean power, and broke fortb, not only in most unfraternal words, but in most cruel deeds. Tbis was tbe special occasion of tbe propbecy bere recorded. Otber propbets bave predicted tbe fall of Edom, some of ear- lier date, e. g.^ Isaiah and Joel, and some contemporary, or of later date, e. g.^ Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Malacbi, and tbe writer of Psalm 137. (See Isaiah 21: 11; and 34: and Joel 3 : 19, and Jeremiah 49 : 7-22 (closely parallel), and Ezek. 25 : 12-14, and Mai. 1 : 3, 4.) CHAPTER I. 1. The vision of Obadiah. Thus saitli the Lord God concerning Edom ; We have heard a minor from the Lord, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let lis rise up against her in battle. The Lord commissions bis servant Obadiah to proclaim, "We bave beard from tbe Lord a message, i. «., a thing to be announced (not a " rumor " in the sense of an uncertain, flying report), to the effect that bis providential agencies bave summoned tbe heathen forth, calling on them to arise and come up for battle against Edom. 2. Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen : thou art greatly despised. 3. The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high ; that saith in his heart, Wlio shall bring me down to the ground ? 4. Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the Loikd. The great men of Edom bad been proud (we may suppose) of tbe high antiquity of their nation ; of their great wealth, their country having been for ages tbe thoroughfare of commerce be- tween Egypt and North Africa on their southwest, and the rich countries of Mesopotamia and India on the east and northeast ; of their eminent j)rogress in the arts, of which tbe ruins yet remain- ing are ample proof; and of their early knowledge of letters, of which the Book of Job (native to this country) is good testimony. Sir Isaac Newton came to tbe conclusion that Edom was the nur- OBADIAH.— CHAP. I. 161 sery of the arts and sciences for all the world, and that even the Egyptians received from them their earliest knowledge of astron- omy and of its nse in navigation. Men of the world think and speak of pride on such grounds as honest and honorable; but, how- ever this may be, it surely cannot atone for moral obliquities, for national animosity, jealousy, revenge, and perpetual hatred. And when, as in this case, national pride deceives a people so greatly as to make them think they have nothing to fear from the just judg- ments of God, the mistake is fearful. This was the sin and ruin of ancient Edom. The phrase " Thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high," has in modern times received a very striking confirmation from the personal visits and examination made by a large number of travellers — Burckhardt among the earliest; Dr. Edward Eobinson among the most accurate and reliable. They and others have found on the site of ancient Petra a vast amount of ruins of the homes of both the living and the dead, especially along the face of an immense gorge or chasm, where the perpendicular rock, several hundred feet in height, was improved for temples, sepulchres, and" private residences, chiselled from the rock itself. The massive grandeur of these ruins aids us to appreciate the de- scription, " Thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose hab- itation is high." It also accounts for the pride and vain confidence felt by the men of Edom in the military strength of their fast- nesses, and evinces the pertinence of the divine word, " Though thou lift thyself high as the eagle, and set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down." How vain it must ever be for even the loftiest and mightiest of men to defy the Almighty, or count themselves above the reach of his retributions ! 5. If thieves came to tTiee, if robbers by night (how art thou cut off!) would they not have stolen till they had enough ? if the grape-gatherers came to thee, would they not leave some grapes ? 6. How are the things of Esau searched out ! how are his hidden things sought up ! These supposed cases — the thieves, the night-robbers, and the grape-gatherers — all have the same object, viz., to show that the spoihng of Esau would be unsparing. The inteijected exclamation — " How art thou cut off*! " — implies that the desolation of Esau would be more dire than that wrought by thieves and night-rob- hers. The latter, compelled by fear to make short work, are wont to seize what comes first to hand till they have enough for present want, or, as the case may be, all they can carry away ; and so may leave some valuables behind. Grape-gatherers leave gleanings. - But Esau's wealth will be carefully searched out. Those who shall come to spoil him will find all his hidden stores. The exclamation in v. 6 corresponds in form of statement precisely to that thrown into 162 OBADIAH.— CHAP. I. the middle of v. 5 — " How art tLon cut off! " The prophet's eye and heart were full of the sad fate of so much wealth, beauty, and glory, doomed to utter desolation. 1. All the men of tliy confederacy liave bronglit thee even to the border : the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee ; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound nnder thee : there is none understanding in him. When the Lord's time comes to cast a mighty nation down, he causes all their friends to turn against them. So this verse affirms of the kingdom of Edom. First, all his allies (" men of thy con- federacy"), bound by treaty to stand or fall with him, cast him out of their country, chasing him even to their border, as one turns a villain out of his doors. Next, those who were on terms of peace and friendship turn to deceive him, and prevail against him ; and last, even his dependents, who ate at his table, put a snare under his feet to entrap him. Snare (not "wound") is the sense of the original word used here. Finally, this utter failure of all his re- liances suggests the remark, *' There is no understanding in him." He should not have trusted such helpers, and rejected the Almighty God! 8. Shall I not in that da}^, saith the Loed, even de- stroy the wise men ont of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau ? The closing thought of the verse preceding suggests these ques- tions. Edom was celebrated for her wise men, and was proud of them. "Would not the Lord in that day destroy those great men, and cause wisdom to cease from the mount of Esau ? 9. And thy mighty men^ O Teman, shall be dis- mayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. Her warriors also should be smitten with panic, in order that the slaughter of the people might be complete. " Teman " was the name of a city and region in the eastern part of Idumea. Per- haps it was celebrated for its courage and prowess in war. 10. For thy violence against thy brother Jacob, shame shall come over thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever. The discourse turns here from the destruction of Edom to those sins which were its special cause. These sins were their violence and outrages against the posterity of Jacob, their brother. For this they should be ashamed and confounded ; and for this the nation should ultimately be cut off forever, These two inflictions would OBADIAH. 163 be distinct,* aud mi^lit be somewhat widely separated in time. The form of the prophetic statement admits this distinction ; the facts of history fulUlled it. The shameful defeat came from the hand of Nebuchadnezzar ; the final overthrow was postponed into the eai-ly ages of the Christian era. 11. In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them. 12. But thou shouldest not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger ; neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction ; neither should- est thou have spoken proudly in the day of distress. 13. Thou shouldest not have entered into the gate of my people in the day of their calamity ; yea, thou shouldest not have looked on their affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on their substance in the day of their calamity ; 14. Neither shouldest thou have stood in the cross- way, to cut off those of his that did escape ; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress. These specifications of what Esau had done in the line of vio- lence and wrong toward his brother Jacob are put in the form of pointed rebuke, after the fact. In the day when the Chaldeans took his (Jacob's) armed men captive, entered his gates, and cast lots upon whatever was fair and precious in the holy city, thou wast hostile and violent as they. " Thou stoodest on the other side " means more than simply standing aloof and distant ; it im- ' plies the attitude of an adversary. The original words have this sense (2 Sam. 18:13): " Thou wouldest have set thyself against them." " Thou wast as one of them " might possibly, if taken by itself, mean only that the men of Edom sympathized fully with the Chaldeans and against the Jews ; but it more naturally imphes that they participated heartily in the assault and pillage of the hated city. V. 14 certainly means all this. "Thou shouldest not have looked on (exultingly) in the day when he was treated as an alien." V. 12 shows that they were present in the sack and ruin of the city, seizing the opportunity to rush within those gates and lay hands on her spoil. The middle clause of this verse (12) is made specially emphatic — "Thou shouldest not," of all the na- tions, " thou shouldest not have been looking on, to gloat thine envious and cruel eye with the sight of their calamities." V. 14 rep- 164 OBADIAH. resents that tliey most cruelly stood in the road-crossings to waylay : the fleeing Jews, to cut off their escape, and to deliver them up as captives to their cruel captors. They should have done none of these things. God — the righteous God of nations — is now holding them to a strict and stern responsibility for those cruel violations of fraternal sympathy which should have hound them to the pos- terity of their father's brother. The vrriter of Ps. 137 felt the spirit of this just retribution — "Eemember, O Lord, the children of Edom in the day of avenging Jerusalem, who said : Ease it, rase it, even to the foundation thereof" (v. 7). 15. For tliG day of the Loed is near upon all the hea- then : as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee : thy reward shall return upon thine o^ti head. " The day of the Lord " is his time for retribution, declared here to be " near upon all the heathen." It came soon by the hand of Kebuchadnezzar. " As thou " (Edom) " hast done to Jerusalem, so shall it be done unto thee ; thy reward " (the sort of treatment thou hast shown to others) " shall come back upon thine own head." IG. For as ye have drunk upon my holy mountain, so shall all the heathen drink continually, yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though they had not been. These allusions to drinking are explained by the usage of the prophets. TV hen they bore predictions of dire calamity, they were said to carry a cup filled with a mixture which represented the wrath and vengeance of the Almighty. The ground passage is Ps. 75 : 7, 8: "But God is the judge; he putteth down one, and setteth up another ; for in the hand of the Lord there is a cup, and the wine is red ; it is full of mixture : but the dregs thereof — all the wicked of the earth shall wring them out and drink them." To Jerusalem Isaiah said (51 : 17) : " Stand up, thou who hast drunk at the hand of the Lord the cup of his fury." In Jer. 25 : 15-33, this figure is carried out fully : " Take the wine-cup of this fury at mine hand, and cause all the nations to whom I send thee to drink it." So also Jer. 49 : 12, in a passage very closely parallel to this of Obadiah. With this view of the sense of this figure, it seems necessary to refer the first clause — "ye who have drunk on my holy moun- tain " — to the Jews themselves. Tliey had taken their tui*n in drink- ing from this cup of retributive justice ; now all the heathen — Edom among them — must follow. These guilty heathen nations must drink copiously, for the word rendered " swallow down " is strong — shall guzzle down, as men who love it, and suck out the very dregs with keenest rehsh. And this shall be the end of them — then* cup of national annihilation. 17. But upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and OBADIAH. 165 there thall be holiness ; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. Over against the final fate of those oppressive and wicked na- tions, Mount Zion stands in the strongest contrast. Turning now to promises for the people of God, the prophet portrays the victory given to Zion's side. Mount Zion shall be delivered, and, best of all, " shall become Tioly.''^ This will secure her forever against such fearful calamities, for these come only as needful discipline to cleanse her from her sins. That " the house of Jacob shall possess their pos- sessions " will either mean that they repossess their former land, or that they gain possession of the country of the heathen — one or the other, according as the pronoun " tlieir " is reflexive, meaning their own, or refers to heathen nations. The former is most probable. The latter fact is taught specially in vs. 19, 20. 18. And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stub- ble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them ; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau ; for the Lord hath spoken it. Fire is one of the oriental images for war and its devastations. Thus, Num. 21 : 28 : "For a fire is gone out of Heshbon, a flame from the city of Sihon; it hath consumed Ar of Moab," &c. Isaiah (10 : 17), setting forth how God's consuming wrath fell on the Assyrian host, says, " The light of Israel shall be for a fire, and his Holy One for a flame, and it shall burn and devour his thorns and briers in one day." So here, the house of Jacob shall be a fire, &c., and Esau stubble. This must imply that Jacob should be the executioner of the Lord's vengeance upon Esau. A signal fulfil- ment of this prophecy took place under John Hyrcanus, b. c. 125. 19. And they of the south shall possess the mount of Esau ; and they of the plain the Philistines : and they shall possess the fields, of Ephraim, and the fields of Sa- maria : and Benjamin shall possess Gilead. The people of the southern part of Palestine should possess the mount of Esau, that being contiguous to their homes. They of the plain country, the southwest portion of Palestine, should have the country of the Philistines, adjacent to them, &c. 20. And the captivity of this host of the children of Israel shall possess that of the Canaanites, even unto Zarej)hath ; and the captivity of Jerusalem, which is in Sepharad, shall possess the cities of the south. " The captives of this host " are the captives returning from Babylon. They shall possess the country long held by the Canaan- 166 OBADIAH. ites, even to ZarepliatL, a city near Zidon (see 1 Kings 17:9), and called " Sarepta," Luke 4 : 26. The geography of '' Sepharad " is not fully settled. It was a place whither some captives from Je- rusalem were sent by the Chaldeans. Kecent critics locate it in Western Asia, near the Bosphorus. 21. And saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau ; and the kingdom shall be the Lord's. " Saviours " must be nsed here in the sense in which God raised up saviours to deliver the people in the days of the Judges that succeeded Joshua. The passage teaches that the princes reigning on Mount Zion shall rule over Mount Esau : " the elder shall serve the younger," or rather, in the much broader sense, the people who stand with God shall bear sway over all the realms and peoples of the earth. The wicked shall no more bear rule ; " the kingdom is the Lord's and he is Governor among the nations." This is the great truth in which the whole Book of Obadiah culminates- a glo- rious truth indeed ' JOI^AH. INTEODUCTION. This book, more tlian any otlier in the Bible, has been assailed with ridicule by infidels, and tortured from its simplicity by neolog- ical critics. Whereas its air is that of a simple narrative of facts, immense efforts have been made to show that its statements are not fact, but fiction. Some of these critics would make it a vision ; some an allegory ; some a parable ; others a tale of ancient tradi- tion, believed by people of weak minds, perhaps, but by such only, and never reliable. It would scarcely pay to foUow out these critical fancies in detail. Let it sufiiee that the narrative bears not the least trace of being a vision, or an allegory, or a parable, or a tale of old-time tradition. From beginning to end it is simple, straightforward, nobly honest and self- condemning, especially con- sidered as written by Jonah of himself; in short, in every respect bearing the best internal evidence of truth. Then further, the book has worthy moral ol>jects ; e. g.^ to set forth the peril of flee- ing from the path of duty, however rough or even dangerous that path may be ; also, the ways of God's discipline to bring his wan- dering servants back, and the tenderness of his pity and forgiving love toward them despite of their sins ; and yet further, the prin- ciples on which God deals with nations, even the heathen, whether in judgment when they sin, or in sparing mercy when they repent. Such objects as these are great and good enough to entitle the book of Jonah to a place in the sacred canon; or we might go farther back and say, sufiSciently important to justify God in making those arrangements of his providence which constitute Ms part in these 168 JOXAH.— CHAP. I. scenes of Jonah's history. But more than all, Jonah is distinctly recognized, in both the Old Testament and the New, as an historical and not a fictitious person. In Old Testament history, 2 Kings 14 : 25 distinctly refers to this Jonah, the son of Amittai, in these words : " He (Jeroboam II.) restored the coast of Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain, according to the word of the Lord God of Israel, which he spake by the hand of his servant Jonah, the son of Amittai, who was of Gath-Hepher." This city was assigned to the tribe of Zebnlon (Josh. 19 : 13), so that Jonah's residence was within the kingdom of the ten tribes. He is thus located, precisely as to 'place ^ and proximately as to time-, not later than the early part of the reign of Jeroboam II. (reigned B. 0. 825-784). In the IsTew Testament, the proof to the point that Jonah was a real and not a fictitious character, is complete. (See Matt. 12 : 39-41, and 16:4.) The Lord Jesus most distinctly re- fers to Jonah as the subject of a sign — i. e.^ of a miracle — as having been three days and three nights in the whale's belly, and as hav- ing preached to the people of Nineveh, under which preaching they repented ; and finally, he definitely compares himself with Jonah • " Behold, a greater than Jonah is here." Now, if, despite of these testimonies to the contrary, men insist that Jonah is to be ac- counted a fictitious character, they may say the same with equal reason of the queen of Sheba and of the wise Solomon. "Will it be claimed that the Lord Jesus did not Tcnoic whether the history of Jonah were truth or fiction? or that, knowing it to be fiction, he did not care how strongly his allusions to it implied its truth and misled the people ? Neither of these positions will ever be taken by those who intelligently accept and honor Jesus Christ as a teacher sent from God, and the very impersonation of truth. Yet further, the apocryphal Book of Tobit (14 : 4, 8) recognizes Jonah as an historical and not a fictitious character, a fact which at least testifies to current Jewish opinion at its date. Josephus is yet another witness to the same point (Ant. 9 : 10, 12). The case of Jonah suggests that the Hebrew prophets, though brought into very near relations to God, were yet only human — ^men of like passions with the race at large, and subject to the tempta- tions incident to human frailties. His course in fleeing to Tarshisli and his spirit while at Nineveh, are at once sm-prising and painful. In view of the fact that he was one of the earliest of the Hebrew prophets whose writings have come do^ii to us, it is at least sup- posable that the Lord intended this example to be a lesson of spe- JONAH.— CHAP. I. 1^9 cial admonition to all subsequent prophets. Let us hope that it was blessed to them as a warning against being unfaithful to their mission, and against assuming to dictate or question the pohcy of the Most High God. CHAPTER I. JoTiTAH is commissioned to go to Mnevch and forewarn them of their destruction (vs. 1, 2). He attempts to flee away to Spain in- stead (v. 8) ; a tempest from the Lord arrests the ship (vs. 4-1 1) ; he is thrown overboard and caught up by a great fish (vs. 11-17). 1. 'Now tlie word of tlie Loed came unto Jonali tlie son of Amittai, sayino^, 2. Arise, go to Sineveli, tliat great city, and cry against it ; for tlieir wickedness is come np before me. Nineveh, on the eastern bank of the Tigris, opposite the site of the modern Mosul, for many ages past in ruins, has been discovered and its ruins somewhat thoroughly explored in the present century. It was the capital of ancient Assyria, one of the oldest cities since the flood (Gen. 10 : 11, 12), long celebrated for its size, wealth, and magnificence. At this time its wickedness had come up before God, and he mercifully sent to them a prophet from Israel to forewarn them of impending ruin and exhort them to repent^ The Hebrew prophets were somewhat frequently commissioned to utter predic- tions of judgment on Gentile nations, but seem to have been very rarely sent in person to bear these predictions to those nations. In Jer. 27 maybe seen a proximate case. The prophet was directed to send his prophetic message by the hand of foreign ambassadors present at the Jewish capital. 3. But Jonah rose up to flee unto Tarsliisli from tlie presence of the Loed, and went down to Joppa ; and he found a ship going to -Tarshish : so he paid the fare thereof, and went down into it, to go with them unto Tarshish from the presence of the Loed. It is now quite settled among critics that "Tarshish" was the city Tartessus, in Spain, with which the Phoenicians kept up an active trade by sea. Jonah thought to escape the responsibility of his unwelcome commission to Mneveh by taking ship at once to Tarshish. The narrative is particular to state repeatedly that this was "fleeing from the presence of the Lord"^ — as if there would be no God in Tarshish to make him trouble ! or at least, as if God could not object to his laying down his prophetic ofiice, and going abroad to foreign lands. We naturally ask — What could have 170 JONAH.— CHAP. I. been Lis motive and what liis temptation to a course so wicked and so foolish ? Fear for his personal safety is the cause we most naturally think of, yet of this it might well be asked — Did not he know that if the Lord sent him into danger, he could protect him through it ? and that it is always safe for a child of God to go where he knows his Father sends him ? Another motive, even less worthy than this of fear, is indicated by his own strange expostulation with God (4 : 1, 2), because He retracted his threat to destroy Nineveh and turned from punishment to pardon. This • change on the part of God "displeased Jonah exceedingly, and he was very angry!" (Alas for poor human nature !) "And he prayed unto the Lord and said — I pray thee, O Lord, was not this my saying when I was yet in my country ? Therefore I fled before to Tarshish ; for I knew that thou art a gracious God and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repentest thee of the evil." Ah, indeed! then Jonah did not like to go to Nineveh, through fear that they would repent, and then the Lord would forgive them and not destroy the city, as he was about to proclaim. And was he concerned lest his reputation should suffer, and he be thought a false prophet ? Alas, again we must say, for the follies and sins of man ! In some points of view it seems wonderful that God should employ such a man at all as a prophet — only that in the sins of Jonah many a man might see his own, if he would. The Lord has great moral lessons to teach us from these sins of Jonah. Let none of us be too blind to see them, nor too much in love with sin to accept the rebuke they read to us, and repent. 4. But tlia LoED sent out a great wind into the sea, and there was a mighty tempest in the sea, so that the ship was like to be broken. The verb rendered "sent out" is strikingly expressive. lie hurled down upon the sea a great wind. The same word is used in the next verse for casting out the wai'es from the ship. So easily does God cast forth his tempest blasts and lash the sea into fury. 5. Then the mariners were afraid, and cried every man unto his god, and cast forth the wares that were in the ship into the sea, to lighten it of them. But Jonah was gone down into the sides of the ship ; and he lay, and was fast asleep. Those heathen men — for such they doubtless were — had each his god. In his danger each of those men prayed to the god he was wont to worship. "Who does not pray in the hour of peril ? Certainly the heathen are usually no exception. Probably there are no people on earth further removed fi-om confidence in some super- human power able to befriend and save, than the irreligious and profane class in Christian lands. JONAH.— CHAP. I. 171 Some have thonght that the statement' respecting Jonah as fast asleep under such cu'cum stances, is violently improbable. But who knows how far he had walked during the previous day to reach Joppa, or how much he may have suffered in his mind throughout his journey, and for days previous? The ways of sin are not wont to be ways of pleasantness, nor her paths those of peace. 6. So the sliipmaster came to him, and said unto him, What meanest thou, O sleeper ? arise, call upon thy God, if so be that God will think upon us, that we perish not. This rousing call must have stung the sleeper, especially when, having fully awakened, he saw that God had met him in his guilty way, and had brought such peril upon others for his sake. It is noticeable that the word God in the last clause has the article : ''It may be that the great and the true God will think upon us," &c. Had he not some just conception of the one only true God ? 1. And they said every one to his fellow, Come, and let us cast lots, that we may know for whose cause this evil is upon us. So they cast lots, and the lot fell upon Jonah. The "lot" was practically an appeal to God to decide a pend- ing question by his providence. In this case the Lord took the disposal of the lot, according to Prov. 16 : 33 : " The lot is cast into the lap ; but the whole disposing thereof is of the Lord." It put the finger of God upon Jonah. 8. Then said they unto him, Tell us, we pray thee, for whose cause this evil is upon us; What is thine occupation ? and whence comest thou ? what is thy country ? and of what people art thou ? 9. And he said unto them, I am an Hebrew ; and I fear the Loed, the God of heaven, which hath made the sea and the dry land. 10. Then were the men exceedingly afraid, and said unto him, Why hast thou done this 1 For the men knew that he fled from the presence of the Lokd, be- cause he had told them. The alarm felt by those sailors was greatly increased when Jonah told them that the God whom he feared and worshipped was that great God of heaven wlio made the sea and the dry land. They could not help rebuking him. How couldest thou offend such a God ? See what comes of it ! Didst thou think to escape the wrath and the reach of so great a God ? 172 JONAH.— CHAP. I. 11. Then said they unto him, What shall we do imto thee, that the sea may be calm nnto ns ? for the sea wrought and was tempestuous. They see plainly that they must do something with Jonah. He is the Achan in their camp. So they frankly ask him what they shall do with him. The last clause manifestly means that the sea was becoming more and more tempestuous. 12. And he said unto them. Take me up, and cast me forth into the sea ; so shall the sea be calm unto you : for I know that for my sake this great tempest is upon you. Here is one redeeming quality in the character of Jonah. It is pleasant to see a man, when found in sin, so frank, so honest, so consciously sensible of his fault, and so ready to suffer the whole fruit of his own misdoings, and relieve his comi^anions. 13. Nevertheless the men rowed hard to bring it to the land ; but they could not : for the sea wrought, and was tempestuous against them. The spirit which Jonah manifested awakened the sympathy of the captain and crew in his behalf, and again they dug into the sea with their oars (so the Hebrew means), to bring their ship to land ; but all in vain. The sea only became the more furious. 14. "Wherefore they cried unto the Loed, and said, We beseech thee, O Lokd, we beseech thee, let us not perish for this man's life, and lay not upon us innocent blood : for thou, O Lokd, hast done as it pleased thee. It was a solemn thing to take this human life ; and like men who appreciate this, they once more implore the mercy of God, and beseech him to note the necessity that lies upon them, wliich they refer distinctly to his manifest hand in providence, so that they may not be held guilty of innocent blood. 15. So they took up Jonah, and cast him forth into the sea : and the sea ceased from her raging. 16. Then the men feared the Lokd exceedingly, and offered a sacrifice unto the Lokd, and made vows. 17. ISTow the LoED had prepared a great fish to swal- low up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights. The original word rendered " prepared " means appointed, assigned, i. e., to this service. This fish was providentially ready. The fact here stated is the great stone of stumbhng and rock of offence to that class of critics who deny the existence of miracles. JONAH.— CHAP. II. 173 We need have no special sympathy with their perplexities or their stumbling ; for there can be no good reason for rejecting miracles. Besides, in this case, our divine Lord distinctly recognizes the pres- ence of miracles by saying that Jonah was " a sij/Ti," i. e., a man in whom miracles were manifested. It is not necessarily a miracle that a great fish should swallow a man. There are several varieties that are capable of swallowing a man whole, for they have done it. But that a man should live three days and three nights, or^ indeed, one hour, in the belly of a fish, "must be a miracle. CHAPTEK II. In this short chapter, Jonah has put on record the prayers he pom-ed out unto God fi-om his heart of anguish while imprisoned three days in the stomach of a sea-monster. 1. Tlien Jonali prayed unto the Loed his God out of the fish's belly, 2. And said, I cried by reason of mine afilietion unto the Loed, and he heard me ; out of the belly of hell cried I, and thou heardest my voice. The phrase — "out of the belly of hell" — should not carry our minds to the place of final torment for the wicked, but to the pit or grave, where the bodies of men are laid at death. He felt lU^e one buried alive — his consciousness still active and keen as ever, but himself shut up in darkness ; imprisoned, apparently past hope of ever seeing the light of this fair world again, save as he knew and felt that his God might mercifully restore him. The Hebrew- word used here (Sheol) often has this sense — the grave. U**4*Ml 3. For thou hast cast me into the deep, in the midsf of the seas ; and the floods compassed me about : all thy billows and thy waves passed over me. Many of the expressions in this prayer of Jonah occur in the Psalms, with only slight variations, if any. The reader may find it interesting to compare v. 2 with Ps, 120 : 1 ; v. 3 with 42 : 7 ; v. 4 with 31 : 22 ; V. 5 with 69 : 1 ; v. 7 with 142 : 3 ; v. 8 with 31 : 6 ; and v. 9 with 3 : 8. This comparison goes far to establish two interesting facts : (1.) That these psalms were extant in Jonah's time; (2.) That he had read them often, had become familiar with their phraseology, especially that which was used in prayer, and was therefore accustomed to use their language in his own de- votions. He did as Christians now do who are familiar with the devotional portions of God's word— use those forms of expression in their daily and hourly intercessions before God. 1Y4 JONAH.— CHAP. n. 4. Then I said, I am cast out of tliy sight ; yet I will look again toward thy holy temple. It cannot surprise us that Jonah both said* and felt, " I am cast out of thy sight." When his fellow-passengers on shipboard took him up and cast him overboard, it must have seemed to him that God was casting him forth out of his sight forever. But Jonah had once known the loving-kindness of his God. Hence, the thought of possible mercy came now to his relief, and he said, " Yet I will look once more toward thy holy temple." Did he not appreciate in that hour how much the mercy of God is worth to a soul con- sciously lost ? 6. The waters compassed me about, even to the soul : the depth closed me round about, the weeds were wrapped about my head. He seemed to himself to lie on the bottom of tne sea— its weeds wrapped as his winding-sheet about him. 6. I went down to the bottoms of the mountains ; the eai-th with her bars was about me for ever : yet hast thou brought up my life from corruption, O Loed my God. The word " bars," in the clause " the earth with her bars was about me forever," Gesenius supposes to refer to the bars of Sheol — the under world — as closed now upon him forever. But the promi- nent position of the word " earth " in the sentence favors another construction, viz., that the earth, in the sense of land as opposed to sea, had cast him out, and closed its bars upon him, so that he could not hope ever to see its hght and beauty again. If he had meant the bars of Sheol, he might readily have said so in unambiguous 'teians'jrT'»*-yet, notwithstanding he was so imprisoned in the depths ►of the sea, he lifts up his grateful eye and his voice of acknowledg- ment to God above — " Thou hast brought up my life from the pit, O Lord my God. Y. When ray soul fainted within me I remembered the LoKD : and my prayer came in unto thee, into thine holy temple. 8. They that observe lying vanities, forsake their own mercy. " They that observe lying vanities " are the worshippers of idol gods which are always false and vain. They do indeed '•^forsake " in the sense of rejecting and losing their own mercies. They miserably forego the blessedness that is in store for them in the true God, if only they will seek it there. So of all sinners who seek their good elsewhere than in the Uving God. They "forsake their own mercies." JONAH.— CHAP. m. 175 9. But I will sacrifice imto tliee with the voice of thanksgiving ; I will pay that that I have vowed. Sal- vation is of the LoKD. Precisely what his vows were in Ms trouble he has not said. Doubtless he promised the Lord never again to try to flee from his presence to avoid an unwelcome duty. He closes with this most expressive, glorious testimony: ^^ Salvation is of tlie Lord.'''' He and he only can save in times of trouble. 10. And the Loed spake unto the fish, and it vomit- ed out Jonah npon the dry land. With infinite ease the Lord spake — only spaTce to the fish — and it vomited Jonah forth upon the dry land, doubtless on the shore of his native country, Palestine. It would seem that the ship had not gone far from its starting-point, Joppa, when the storm headed and beat it back. CHAPTER III. OoMiNiANDED a second time, Jonah goes to Mneveh, and pro- claims its approaching ruin. The people and their king humble themselves and repent before God ; he turns from his purpose and spares the city. 1. And the word of the Lord came unto Jonah the second time, saying, 2. Arise, go unto JSTineveh, that great city, and preach unto it the preaching that I bid thee. Jonah was not only to go as commanded, but he is specially charged to preach to that great and proud city what God should bid him preach — a charge very probably significant of some appre- hension lest Jonah might trip at this point, and certainly full of suggestions to all who are ever called of God to preach in his name. What have they to do to preach out of their own heart, to sub- serve some supposed interest of their own, other than that for which God sends them ? They might as well flee to Tarshish, to escape the duty of preaching the ruin of the wicked, as to withhold God's threatenings, or preach something else and other than what God bids them, when they reach the Nineveh whither he sends them. 3. So Jonah arose, and went unto Mneveh, accord- ing to the word of the Loed. ISTow Mneveh was an ex- ceeding great city of three days' journey. Now Jonah obeys. He is a wiser and a better man for the dis- cipline God has given him. " Before I was aflSicted, I went astray ; 176 JONAH.— CHAP. m. but now have I kept thy word." Tlie jilirase "an exceeding great city," stands in the Hebrew, " a city great to Qod^^ i. e., great before him — great as to him, in his estimation. The Hebrews were accustomed to express their highest ideas of the superlative degree by using the name of God, e. g.^ "mountains of God," &c. The sense of this passage may be somewhat more specific, representing the city as great in its relations to God, and not merely as very great apart from those relations. In estimating an oriental day's journey, w^e must think of a caravan,, heavy laden, many on foot, in a hot climate. Twenty miles would be the maximum. Tht statement " a city of three days' journey " should probably be ap- plied to its circumference, and not to its diameter ; because sixty miles in diameter would make the city incredibly large ; because one of the most reliable ancient historians, Diodorus Siculus (H., 3) represents it as sixty miles in circuit ; and because Jonah's begin- ning to enter it one day's journey (v. 4) may have been on a tor- tuous course, and not on a right line through its centre. 4. And Jonali began to enter into the city a day's journey, and he cried, and said, Yet forty days, and !Nineveh shall be overthrown. Jonah seems to have begun liis preaching as he entered the city, and to have made his proclamation in the streets and public places, wherever he found people to hear him. 5. So the people of ^Nineveh believed God, and pro- claimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them. The first step toward their repentance and salvation lay in their 'believing Ood. They accepted the message of this solitary stran- ger as one sent them by the Most High God. To those who have noted the strange incredulity of millions under the fight of the gospel, this fact appears surprising. We must suppose that Jonah spake as one who felt the solemnity of his mission and car- ried the air of a deeply honest man, and we must also suppose that he had their conscience on his side, and that the power of God was in and with Ins words. 6. For word came unto the king of jSTineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered him with sackcloth, and sat in ashes. It does not appear that the king heard from Jonah's own lips ; but the word came to him through his servants. They testified to the deep, pervading conviction of the people, and the king at once befieved God as his people had done. The name of this king is not given or known. This record of him may well rebuke many an ungodly monarch who plants his foot upon the very idea of " a higher law of God," and scornfully repels aU authority higher than the mandates of his own will. JONAH.— CHAP. in. lYY 7. And lie caused it to be proclaimed and piiblislied tliroiigli Nineveh by decree of the king and his no- bles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing : let them not feed, nor drink water : 8. But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God : yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands. It is specially noticeable that this prochimation calls not only for humiliation, fasting, and all the customary oriental tokens of sorrow and penitence, and for prayer also — crying mightily to God — but also specially enjoins on all men to "turn every one from his evil way and from the violence that is in their hands." So manifest is it that the law of justice and right is everywhere in the human mind, and that no heathen can be so blind as not to see it. This also is a stinging rebuke to men, who, under far clearer light than theirs, yet labor to extinguish this light, or, in the more fit and expressive words of revelation, " put darkness for light and light for darkness." 9. Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not ? The form of this question suggests that the king of Nineveh did not Tcnoio that God would always forgive a penitent people. He had heard less of God than we have. But he could say, " Who can tell (literally, " who knows ") whether he will turn and repent, that we perish not ? " On this assumed possibility he bases his call to humiliation, fasting, prayer, and reform. 10. And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way ; and God repented of the evil that he had said that he would do unto them ; and he did it not. "God saw," not their professions, nor merely their prayers, but " their works, that they turned from their evil way." Of course, when they changed their moral attitude before him, he changed his plan ; turned from his purpose, and spared the city. So he always deals with the nations of the earth. Works meet for repentance will infallibly secure the reversal of threatened and impending doom. God's immutability is that of principle — not of plan and action. He immutably hates and punishes sin : hence, when a sinner becomes a penitent, God turns from threatened vengeance to free pardon. 8* 178 JONAH.— CHAP. IV. CHAPTER IV. This chapter is a mournful record of the moral frailties of a good man, and a glorious testimony to the pity, forbearance, and love of the blessed God. Jonah is greatly displeased because the Lord reversed the predicted fall of Nineveh : he waits outside the city to see what the Lord would do to it ; he put up a rude tent for shelter from the heat ; and the Lord brought up a gourd over him for his further relief; liut a worm destroys the gourd. Jonah is again fretful, impatient, and angry, and the Lord very gently rebukes him, and gives reasons for sparing Nineveh. 1. But it displeased Jonah exceedingly, and he was very angry. Some critics give the word rendered in this passage " displeased," the sense of grieved. It would be a great relief to my feehngs of sorrow and shame, if the words and the circumstances would bear this construction. But as an interpreter of God's word, I must honor the truth rather than humor the feelings of the heart. So tMs passage must stand, " displeased," " angry exceedingly." 2. And lie prayed unto the Lord, and said, I pray thee, O Lord, loas not this my saying, when I was yet in my country ? Therefore I fled before unto Tarshish : for I knew that thou art a gracious God, and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repentest thee of the evil. In the clause, " Therefore I fled before unto Tarshish," the sense is not that I fled at a former tlme^ but that I fled before I came into such an emergency as this ; I anticipated precisely such a result as this, and I fled heforehand, to avoid it. I did not wish to declare to them from the mouth of the Lord that the city should faU within forty days, and then have my words prove false. To this con- struction, the reasons he assigns correspond : " For I knew that thou art a gracious God, and wouldest probably repent so as not to inflict this evil." The last clause which groups his testimony to God's mercy is in the very words of Joel (2 : 13), and almost iden- tical with Ex. 34 : 6, 7. Probably both passages were familiar to his mind. This boldness before God, while so grievously in the wrong withal, is appalling. It is awful that a sinner, plucked him- self as a brand from the burning, and living on mere mercy alone, should object to God's showing the same mercy to his fellow-sin- ners. Why did he not rather rejoice and shout for joy when he saw the king and people of Nineveh on their faces before God — his warnings pressing them effectually to repentance, and the clouds of gathering vengeance swept away by the hand of love ? JONAH.—CHAP. IV. 179 3. Therefore now, O Loed, take, I beseech thee, my life from me ; for it is better for me to die than to live. AndnoW he is so inuch^vexed and so angry, that he prays God to take his life ! How could he think himself prepared to die in such a temper ? 4. Then said the Loed, Doest thon well to be angry ? Some interpreters render this verse — " Then said the Lord, Art thou mwc/i vexed ? " There are two fatal objections to this ren- deiing: (1.) The question so put is needless, since Jonah had shown his extreme anger but too plainly; and (2.) The original words cannot, legitimately, bear this construction. They mean — Does thine anger burn justly, rightly ? Hast thou any good reason for such anger ? Is it doing well, that thou shouldest let such pas- sions rise ? — A very gentle rebuke indeed, for sins so great and so provoking to God ! 6. So Jonah went out of the city, and sat on the east side of the city, and there made him a booth, and sat under it in the shadow, till he might see what would be- come of the city. " Till he might see what would become of the city " — as if this question were still in suspense. Can it be supposed that he thought — Possibly the Lord will hear my prayer and my expostulation, and will turn again to execute his first sentence of destruction ? 6. And theLoKD God prepared a gourd, and made^'^ to come up over Jonah, that it might be a shadow over his head, to deliver him from his grief. So Jonah was exceeding glad of the gom-d. Still the Lord is mindful of the little comforts of his servant Jonah, and brings up over him very suddenly the shade of a rapidly growing plant, to " reheve his sufferings" — for so, more accurately, I render the words translated " to deliver him from his grief." This " gourd " is supposed to be the shrub known by the name of " Palma Christi." 7. But God prepared a worm when the morning rose the next day, and it smote the gourd that it withered. 8. And it came to pass, when the sun did arise, that God prepared a vehement east wind ; -and the sun beat upon the head of Jonah, that he fainted, and wished in himself to die, and said, It is better for me to die than to live. 180 JONAH.— CHAP. IV. This east wind, wliicli the text reads "vehement," the mar^rfn, nearer tlie truth, has " sUent." It was not a violent but a sultry wind, such as comes up from the desert on the southeast, like the breath of a great furnace. Jonah sinks under^thifs groat hoat, and again wishes that he may die ! IWkft^A^|C^ f^ ptMM^ 9. And God said to Jonali, Dolst tliou well to be angry for the gonrd ? And lie said, I do well to be angry, even unto death. The same question, in the same words as in v. 6, and with the same meaning, only that this respects his recent anger because of the withered gourd. Strange to say, Jonah justifies himself, and by implication, complains of God for sufi:ering the worm to kill his gourd! 10. Then said the Loed, Thou hast had pity on the gourd, for the which thou hast not labored, neither madest it grow ; which came up in a night, and perished in a night : 11. And should not I spare ISTineveh, that great city, wherein are more than sixscore thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand, and also much cattle ? The verb which expresses Jonah's feeling for the gourd is the same which expresses the Lord's feeling for ]S[inevah, yet our trans- lators render the former " hast had pity ^'''' and the latter " Should I not spare ? " This is unfortunate. Pity for the gourd was not precisely the feeling of Jonah; he rather pitied himself. ' The gourd was not a sentient being — was not a sufferer. Yet Jonah deplored the loss of the gourd, and in this point of view the antith- esis bears. The scope of the antithesis is essentially ftiis : — Thou, Jonah, wast pained at the ruin of that gourd, though it had cost thee nothing, and thou hadst done nothing to interest thy heart in its welfare, and it is a short-lived thing at best : should not I, much more, deprecate the ruin of that great city, Nineveh, in which are more than one hundred and twenty thousand human leings (so the Hebrew specially denotes) who have not yet reached the period of moral accountability, and also many cattle who never reach it ? These are all sentient beings ; their happiness is a positive good to them, and therefore to me. They have not sinned against me ; shall I not, therefore, spare the city if I can do so safely and wisely ; spare it especially for the sake of the unsinning beings who are in it and who must be involved in its doom if it falls? Thus it is vegeta- , ble life on the one hand against animal life on the other ; a shrub against a babe or a lamb. For the shrub Jonah had done nothing to enlist his sympathies, but God implies that he has been watch- ing over these infants and the lambs too, with a Father's tender c.are, and has good reason, therefore, to be deeply interested in their happiness. JONAH.— CHAP. IV. 181 The passage makes useful and rich revelations in respect to the feelings of the great God as to those fearful judgments which fall on the wicked, but which, as the world is, must involve some inno- cent beings — a part of them innocent as having not yet reached suf- ficient intelhgence to make them morally accountable, and others as not having by nature any moral attributes. In the light of this passage it becomes altogether plain that God always takes into ac- count the case of these sinless sufferers, and regards their presence as itself a plea for sparing the guilty. Of course, he will give this plea all the consideration which the nature of the case will allow. He will punish, in forms that necessarily involve the unsinning in the general ruin, only when the ends of a moral system impera- tively demand it. Who can estimate the amount of sparing mercy which the guilty of our world owe, in this life, to God's pity for infants and for the sentient but unsinning animal races ? MIOAH INTEODUCTION. MioAH, a name abbreviated from Micaiah, wMcb signifies — Who is like God ? was of Moresbetli-gath, a city near Eleutheropo- lis, and not far from the country of the Philistines. His introduc- tory verse states that he prophesied in the reigns of Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah. As the two former reigned each sixteen years and the latter twenty-nine, the entire duration of his ministry possible within this statement is sixty-one years. He was contemporary with Isaiah, who dates one vision " in the year that king Uzziah, the father of Jotham," "died" (6 : 1), and who was certainly in active service as a prophet under Hezekiah. Interest- ing collateral evidence that Micah prophesied in the reign of Heze- kiah is found in Jer. 26 : 17-19. While some of the priests, princes, and false prophets demanded that Jeremiah should die for the al- leged crime of speaking against the royal city, certain of the elders rose up to defend him with this plea": " Micah, the Morasthite, prophesied in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and spake to all the people of Judah (very publicly), saying : ' Thus saith the Lord of hosts, Zion shall be ploughed like a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of the forest.' Did Hezekiah king of Judah and all Judah put him at all to death ? " &c. See the original passage (Micah 3 : 12). This Micah was not that noble Micaiah, son of Imlah, whom Ahab did not love because he told him too much unwelcome truth. (See 1 Xings 22). Ahab died one hundred and thirty-eight years before Jotham came to the throne. ^Micah, the author, also spake bold and fearless words for God and righteousness. He spake con- MICAH.— CHAP. I. 183 cerning both Samaria and Jerusalem, mostly the latter, exposing and rebuking their sins. He predicted the destruction of both cities. He expatiated on the final glory of Zion, the real kingdom of the Messiah, in words of great beauty and power. It is important to a full understanding of the work of these prophets that we think of their relations to the throne, stemming the tide of wickedness under such reigns as that of Ahaz; power- fully aiding the work of reform under such good kings as Hezekiah. Contemporary with these two kings were Micah, Hosea, Isaiah, and Nahum. CHAPTER I. The sin and doom of Samaria, embracing of course the kingdom of which it was the capital, constitute the leading themes in this chapter. Vs. 10-16 describe the effects of the Assyrian invasion as it swept along over a line of cities that lay in his path. 1. The word of tlie Lord that came to Micah the Morasthite in the days of Jotham, Ahaz, and Heze- kiah, kings of Judah, which he saw concerning Samaria and Jerusalem. 2. Hear, all ye people; hearken, O earth, and all that therein is : and let the Lord God he witness against you, the Lord from his holy temple. 3. For behold, the Loed cometh forth out of his place, and will come down, and tread upon the high places of the earth. 4. And the mountains shall be molten under him, and the valleys shall be cleft, as wax before the fire, and as the waters that are poured down a steep place. The prophet summons all the nations of the earth to hear. Practically, they are supposed to be convened for a great judgment scene, and the Almighty God comes down from his throne in heaven to appear as a witness against them for their sins. His coming down is portrayed with wonderful grandeur. " See ! the Lord comes out of his place : he comes down : he treads on the high places of the earth," as if his glorious footsteps rested only on the mountain tops ; and " the mountains are molten " under the touch of his feet; new valleys are cleft; the solid hills melt as wax before the fire, and flow as water leaping down a precipice. Such convulsions of nature betoken the majesty of nature's God! 184 MICAH.— CHAP. I. 5. For tlie transgression of Jacob is all tliis, and for tlie sins of the lionse of Israel. "What is tlie transgres- sion of Jacob ? is it not Samaria ? and wliat are tbe higli places of Jndab ? are they not Jerusalem ? WTiy is all this ? "For the transgression of Jacob, and the sins of the house of Israel." God comes down to take account of the great sins of his covenant people, and to bring on them retribution therefor. This great judgment to which all the nations are con- vened is, for the present, that of the covenant people only ; but the Gentile nations may well ask — " If judgment begin at the house of God, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God ? And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the un- godly and the sinner appear ? " Indeed, this judgment of Judah and Israel is of most vital concern to all the nations of the earth, since in it and from it they may learn the ways of God's reign over all nations, and the doom which awaits them unless they repent. " What is the transgression of Jacob ? Is it not Samaria ? " Thai is, is it not found in Samaria, concentrated, embodied, developed there, viz., in her idolatry, her violence, injustice, pride, and general corruption of morals ? So also Jerusalem had taken the lead in the idolatries and corruptions of Judah. The phrase "house of Israel," in the second clause of this verse, refers specially to Judah, as is shown by the last clauses of the verse. From this point forward through the chapter, the doom of* Samaria and her king- dom is the main subject. 6. Therefore, I will make Samaria as an heap of the field, and as plantings of a vineyard : and I will ponr down the stones thereof into the valley, and I will dis- cover the foundations thereof. This is a picture of utter desolation. "Heaps of the field," said of a city, shows a surprising contrast to what it was. Once full of noble buildings, now only piles of ruins, heaps of stones and furrows cast up by tlie plough. So Samaria returns back to iha status of a plantation with its ploughed fields and vineyards. Its stones are tumbled down the hill on which the city stood to fill the valley below, and the very foundations on which it stood are laid bare. Modern travellers testify to the precisely literal fulfilment of these words, saying that the valley adjacent to the hill of Samaria is full of the stones which once had a place in her houses and idol temples. So the words of the Lord never fail. 7. And all the graven images thereof shall be beaten to pieces, and all the hires thereof shall be burned with the fire, and all the idols thereof will I lay desolate : for she gathered it of the hire of an harlot, and they shall return to the hire of an harlot. MIOAH.— CHAP. I. 185 As is nsual and altogether right, God's judgments follow and point out the great sins thej come to punish. Hence, the altar and all that pertains to idolatry come up in remembrance before God in the day of his visitation, as appears in this verse. The original word rendered " the hires " thereof, carries tlie mind to the income derived to the city from its idol altars, temples, and worship. The word refers primarily to harlot-hire — the wages of prostitution — and is applied to the money profits of idolatry, under that current prophetic usage which speaks of idolatry as itself harlotry. The last clause of the verse says that, as Samaria had accumulated her wealth and splendor by this sort of harlot-hire, idolatry, and its wages, her people shall return to harlot-hire in the literal sense — ^o that lowest of all pursuits for a living — the life of a common prostitute. If not to this precisely and literally, yet to a sort of life analogous to this and fitly represented by it.— — IIow inexpress- ibly appalling is such a doom ! 8. Therefore, I will wail and howl ; I will go stripped and naked : I will make a wailing like the dragons, and mourning as the owls. It cannot appear strange that the prophet should pause over such a doom and say — '''' Therefore^"^^ for this "I will waU and howl." — ^"Dragons," in the sense of sea-monsters, are not the animals here intended, but probably jackals or wolves. Either of these, in oriental countries, make night hideous with their howling. The best modern critics concur in rendering the last word not " owl," but ostrich. The latter were distinguished for their plain- tive cry far out on the desert. 9. For her wound is incurable ; for it is come unto Judah ; he is come unto the gate of my people, even to Jerusalem. The blow that fell on Samaria and the ten-tribe kingdom was fatal. It swept the nation into a hopeless captivity, and laid the whole land utterly desolate. It also alarmed Judah. Under Sen- nacherib and Eabshakeh, this same Assyrian power even came within sight of Jerusalem, and might be said to have reached her gates. 10. Declare ye it not at Gath, weep ye not at all : in the house of Aphrali roll thyself in the dust. The remaining part of this chapter is a graphic painting of the first results of the Assyrian invasion, as they were felt in one city after another along the line of his march. In most of the cases the things said of each city are a play upon the significant name of that city — a method of writing well adapted to impress the idea upon the memory. Sometimes there is simply a resemblance in sound between the prominent word spoken of a city and the name 186 MiCAH.—cnAr. i. of tliat city. Both of these cases fall under the figure of speech technically called a paronomasia. The latter form of it — resem- blance in sounds — is of course untranslatable. The other form — a play upon the significance of the name of a city — is as if one should exclaim : What ! is there quarrelling in Concord ; war in Salem [Peace] ; family feuds in Philadelphia [Brotherly Love] ; slavery in Freetown ? * " Tell it not in Gath," comes from David's lament over Saul and Jonathan. The idea is — Let not the enemies of Zion hear of her sad fall. Modern critics read the next clause, " weep not in Ako," with which the Hebrew word for " weep" (baka) gives us a case of paranomasia^ better seen when the Hebrew preposition (b) is put before ako, as in the original, making it daJto. This city fell within the sweep of this march of the desolating army. So did Aphrah, which means dust. "In the ^ dusf city, roll thyself in the ' dust.'' " AVeeping is too feeble an expression for a ruin so terrible. To roll thyself in the dust is befitting, and there- fore enjoined. 11. Pass ye away, tliou inhabitant of Sapliir, having thy shame naked : the inhabitant of Zaanan came no't forth in the monrning of Beth-ezel ; he shall receive of you his standing. ♦ 12. For the inhabitants of Maroth waited carefully for good : but evil came down from the Loed unto the gate of Jerusalem. 13. O thou inhabitant of Lachish, bind the chariot to the swift beast : she is the beginning of the sin to the daughter of Zion : for the transgressions of Israel were found in thee. 14. Therefore shalt thou give presents to IVToresheth- gath : the houses of Achzib shall he a lie to the kings of Israel. 15. Yet will I bring an heir unto thee, O inhabitant of Mareshah : he shall come unto AduUam the glory of Israel. I translate these verses rather freely, in order to give as fully as possible the same play upon the words — by paranomasia — that I * Isaiah, contemporary with Micah, is equally remarkable for his free use of paronomasia. A beautiful example is in Isa, 5 : 7 — "He looked for judgment, but behold bloodshed ; for righteousness, but behold an outcry." That is, he looked for I35T1"3, and lo, nsb^ ; forrt|:?^:^£ and lo, np?^. The Hebrew reader will notice that the prominent antithetic words are as like as possible in sound, but as unlike as possible in sense. Herein lie the beauty and force of this figure of speech. It is as if an English writer should say — He looked for the law of rigJit, but lo, the law of might: he looked for good, but behold, blood. MICAH.— CHAP. I. 187 find in the original, and also to give the ultimate sense. To aid the reader yet more, I put the correlated words in italics. "Pass ye on, ye dwellers in Saiihir (the 'beautiful city), in utter nakedness " (as those who flee, stripped by the ravages of war) ; " the dwellers in Zaanan " (the city of flocTcs)^ " do not flocTc out to the mourning of Beth-ezel: " "from you" {i. e., oi Beth-ezel^ city Qi firm root)^ " will he, the conqueror take his camping-ground ; " i. e.^ he will make his camp — his place of halting and stay there (hence their mourning — to which the people of Zaanan do not flock out to sym- pathize with them, though neighbors — having sorrow and fear enough at home). "For the dwellers in Maroth^'' (the city of hitterness) " are in anguish for some good " (all good being lost to them) ; " but evil comes down from the Lord, even to the gates of Jerusalem." How, then, can one of the lesser feeble cities, like Maroth, hope for any good ? It is only natural that a " Maroth," city of bitterness, should be in bitter grief and destruction. This " evil came to the gate of Jerusaleni " — no farther. The Assyrian invader never sacked Jerusalem. The blow that smote the king- dom of the ten tribes fatally, may have alarmed Jerusalem ; it lefb her untouched. The invasion of Sennacherib a few years later proved the ruin of himself, not of Jerusalem. " Bind the chariot to the fleet steed " (for rapid flight) — " thou dweller oiLacJiisTi " (the smitten city), "the first cause of sin was she" (Lachish), "to the daughter of Zion, for in thee were found the sins of Israel." La- chish lay on the southern border of the ten tribes, and being not far from Jerusalem, became the channel through which the temptations to idolatry passed over from Israel, after the revolt, into Jerusalem. Hence this special judgment on Lachish. In the first clause Micah has a paranomasia which is untranslatable between "La- chish" and "Rekesh," the word for fleet steed. " Therefore shalt thou " (Israel) " give divorce papers to More- sheth-gath ; " — though her name signifies city of possession^ thou must forego all possession of her and let her go before the destroyer. " The houses of Achzib " {city of lies) shall be for a lie to the kings of Israel" — no dependence in their need. "Yet wiU I bring an heii* " (one who shall possess) " to thee, O dweller of Mareshah " — which name seems here to mean city of possession. This heir is the conqueror. " He," this conqueror, shall come even to Adullam, which means jiistice of the people — and this sig- nificance, if realized, would be " the glory of IsraeV This passage (vs. 10-15) is admitted to be extremely difficult. No doubt it was intelligible in the age of Micah, though somewhat enigmatical. But such nice, delicate allusions to cities and their significant names must inevitably become obscure by the lapse of ages, and the oblivion of those associations of thought with cities and their names which are in their nature incidental and tem- porary. 16. Make thee bald, and poll thee for thy delicate 188 MICAH.— CHAP. II. cliildren ; enlarge tliy baldness as the eagle ; for they are gone into captivity from thee. The eagle is referred to as an illustration of baldness. Tearing out the hair, or even cutting it off, were usual signs of extreme grief. Ilence the prophet exhorts Israel, considered as the mother of her people, to go into mourning for her children, because they are gone away into captivity, to return no more.: Except in the use of the paranomasia, the passage (Isa. 10 : 28-32) is strikingly analo- gous to this (Mic. 1 : 10-16). There Isaiah sketches the advance ol Sennacherib's host toward Jerusalem, by noting its effects of panic, mourning, or flight, on various cities as he approached. Here Micah describes a similar march of an Assyrian ai'my to destroy the northern kingdom, and to alarm the southern. CHAPTEK II. Tms chapter presents the sins of the people (vs. 1, 2) ; God's threatenings (v. 8) ; lamentations over her doom (vs. 4, 5) ; the gain- saying of a wicked people against God and his prophets (v. 6) ; the prophet's indignant reply (v. 7) ; a further description of their sins (vs. 8, 9) ; the sort of prophets the people choose (v. 11) ; and prom- ises of good (vs. 12, 13). 1. Woe to them that devise iniquity, and work evil npon their beds ! When the morning is light, they prac- tise it, because it is in the power of their hand. This woe fitly comes down, not on those who sin inadvertently, or only under the impulse of sudden temptation, but on those who coolly and with the clear-headed thought of the night-watches, frame plans of mischief and work out schemes for wrong, to be executed in the morning ; and who are wicked enough for all the mischief their hands have the power to do. 2. And they covet fields, and take them by violence ; and houses, and take them away : so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage. " Oppressing a man and Ms house,'''' means robbing not him alone, but his family as well. They take away property in which his wife and children have their living. This is the same class of sins which Amos and Isaiah rebuke so sharply. 3. Therefore thus saith the Lord ; Behold, against this family do I devise an evil, from which ye shall not remove your necks ; neither shall ye go haughtily ; for this time is evil. The idea of retaliation and of just retribution stands out cleai-ly MIC AH.— en AP. II. 189 ill the very form of the prophet's expressions : Tliey devise iniquity ; God devises calamity to punish it. They devise it upon their beds ; God devises it U2wn this whole family — tbe prophet choosing a word for family which has the leading radicals of the word for led. God's calamities shall he on them as a yoke which they cannot throw off, and under which they can no longer walk proudly, carry- ing their heads high — for the prophet's words have this sense. 4. In that day shall ons take up a parable against yon, and lament with a doleful lamentation, and say, we be utterly spoiled : he hath changed the portion of my people : how hath he removed it from me ! turning away he hath divided our fields. The best lexicographers would read the second clause — not> "lament with a doleful lamentation," but thus — " And wail in a dirge of wailing, It is done!'''' i. e.^ all is over! "and say, we are utterly spoiled! " " Changing the portion of my people" means here changing the title to their landed estates, and hence implies that they lose possession of their country. The last clause better — "He hath apportioned our fields to one who takes them all away from us " — i. c, God has given them all to the conqueror of our country. 5. Therefore thou shalt have none that shall cast a cord by lot in the congregation of the Lokd. Consequently there shall be none to setoff their land to them by lot in the public congregation. " Cord " is used here for a measur- ing line for land. The soil has passed into the hands of a foreign power. This is one of their bitter plaints. 6. Prophesy ye not, say they to them that prophesy : they shall not prophesy to them, that they shall not take shame. 7. O thoic that art named the house of Jacob, is the Spirit of the Loed straitened ? are these his doings ? do not my words do good to him that walketh uprightly ? At this point, the ungodly people interpose to gainsay the prophet, forbidding him to prophesy, and suggesting the sort of prophet they would have. The passage is quite obscure, the tran- sitions being abrupt, and the point where the objector's language closes and the prophet's reply begins, being a matter of some doubt. Thus, among the ablest critics now before me, RosenmuUer assigns to the objector less than half of v. 6 ; Henderson precisely v. 0, and no more ; Hengstenberg apparently, vs. 6 and 7. I find the best point of transition from the objector to the prophet at the close of V. 6, and translate thus: " Prophesy not ; let those prophesy who will not prophesy as to such things ; reproaches will never cease." 190 MICAH.— CHAP. 11. This is tlieir demand and this their complaint. They say — "We can't hear any more such prophesying; let us have another sort of men who will not say such Jiard things ; — there is no end to your faul- finding, Then the prophet resumes in v. 7, " Shall this be said in the house of Jacob ? " "Is the Spirit of the Lord to be strait- ened ? " — i. e., to be dictated to by mortal man ? " Are these 7iis doings?" i. e.^ is it his fault that he mast predict calamity? Is it not rather your sins that bring down the wrath and curse of God ? " Do not my words always bless him who walketh uprightly ? " This is the beginning of the prophet's reply. 1 dissent from the English version — " O thou that art named the house of Jacob:" (1.) Because this verb without any preposition following, seems not to bo used in the sense to name; (2.) And mainly, because, beyond all question, this first clause is interrogative and not vocative. There are four distinct questions asked in this verse, each indicated by its interrogative particle. There is, therefore, as much reason for making this first clause a question as either of the three that.foUows. Beyond a doubt, each of the four is an inteiTogative clause. The first expresses the surprise and horror felt by the prophet that men should arise in the house of Jacol) to say such things in the way of dictation to the Almighty ! The construction of v. 6 is exceed- ingly obscure. The sense I have given is a choice among difficulties. 8. Even of late my people is risen up as an enemy : ye pull off tlie robe with the garment from them that pass by securely as men averse from war. 9. The women of my people have ye cast out from their pleasant houses ; from their children have ye taken away my glory for ever. These verses are interposed hereto show that the objectors who cavil against the prophets of the Lord do not themselves " walk up- rightly." Then v. 10 warns them out of tlie land ; and v. 11 returns to tell them what sort of a prophet they choose, and shall have. The words "Even of late" do not necessarily imply that the event is very recent. The horrible thing is that "m?/ people^'''' God's own people, " should have risen up," i. e., in their full strength, " to become an enemy " to every man's rights and interests — a public enemy to all. For instance, " they strip oflP both the outer robe and the inner from men passing along securely " with no thought of danger, " returning from war." Their worn and weary soldiers, returning from hard service for their country, they fall upon, and rob and strip even to the skin ; for the common oriental dress included only these two garments, the outer robe and the inner. " The wives among my people ye expel from their pleasant houses, and from their children ye take away tny orna- ments " (the good clothing I have given them), and never return it — " take it away for every These are named as instances and illustrations of theii' rapacity and wickedness, to show what is MICAH.— CHAP. 11. 191 meant by their "rising np as aa enemy." Bad as any foreign enemy were they even toward the soldiers of their country return- ing from war, and toward wives and children who, being depend- ent and defenceless, are specially under God's protection. 10. Arise ye, and depart ; for this is not your rest : because it is polluted, it shall destroy you, even with a sore destruction. " Up, and away " — be out of this land ; " for this is not your rest." God gave Canaan as a land of rest to his people, but never to such apostates as you ! They had so polluted the land by their sins that it should itself destroy them. The very land is thought of as instinct with life, and fired with holy indignation to devour these guilty inhabitants ! 11. If a man walking in the spirit and falsehood do lie, saying, I will prophesy unto thee of wine and of strong drink; he shall even be the prophet of this people. Having shown (vs. 8, 9) that these cavillers against the Lord's prophets do not "walk uprightly," and having (v. 10) warned them out of the land as their lit doom, he comes now to describe the sort of prophet they would like and shall have. " If a man walking in wind and fiilsehood will lie for them, and will prophesy to them (not '£ 262 HABAKKUK.— CHAP. III. portrayal of Jehovah's great achievements for his ancient people. Never were nobler conceptions wrought np with holder and yet so chaste imagination, or in loftier strains of triumphal song. 16. When I heard, my belly trembled; my lips quivered at the voice : rottenness entered into my bones, and I trembled in myself, that I might rest in the day of trouble : when he cometh up unto the people, he will invade them with his troops. Here the prophet falls back to the point from which he started (v. 2) — to the fear which agitated him so deeply when ho first heard from the Lord that the fierce and terrible Chaldeans were surely coming to overwhelm the nation, to lay the land desolate, and the loved and holy city with its sacred temple in ruins. With all the oriental nations, the belly is the seat of the emotions, especially of grief. Thus Habbakuk : " My bowels were strangely agitated; my lips quivered at the voice," i. «., that uttered those words about the Chaldeans ; " rottenness entered into my bones " and all my strength perished — the bones being the pillars and frame- work of the animal system; "I trembled," not precisely "in my- self," hut under me^ my knees shaking and refusing their office — so strong was my agony of desire " that I might have rest in the day of trouble, in the coming up of the people who shall invade us." The last clause must be connected with the preceding more closely than in our English Bible. I have given a very literal and (as I suppose) an accurate translation. The period around which his anxieties clustered was the hour of the anticipated invasion by the Chaldeans. His prayer and his solicitude looked toward rest for his spirit in that day of trouble when this fierce and savage people should come up against Jerusalem. The word rendered "invade," means to press upon and besiege with troops. 17. Although the fig-tree shall not blossom, neither shall fruit he in the vines ; the labor of the olive shall fail, and the fields shall yield no meat ; the flock shall be cut off from the fold, and there shall he no herd in the stalls : 18. Yet I will rejoice in the Lokd, I will joy in the God of my salvation. 19. The Lord God is my strength, and he will make my feet like hinds' feet, and he will make me to walk upon mine high places. To the chief singer on my stringed instruments. The prophet's prayer was most abundantly answered. The Lord gave him "peace like a river;" — nay, more than merely peace— joy and exultation in the Lord Ms God, and in him aJone HABAKKUK.— CHAP. III. 263 and only. The sentiment of the seventeenth verse is that though every thing else should fail, the fig-tree, the vine, the olive, the fields, the locks and the herds, yet the everlasting God would still live and never could fail or be cut ofi", or be any the less a faithful and glorious God for all the storms of earth, or for the in- vasion and desolating sweep of the most savage robber hosts. The last verse heightens the showing of his joy. Elastic and buoyant, his feet like the feet of the hind who bounds over the cliffs and never makes a mis-step on the crags of the mountain — so he moves along the high places of the earth, all undisturbed by the storms and troubles that harass the dwellers in the vales below. It seems plain that the prophet was brought to this sublime height and placid rest of faith by means of those vivid, soul-thrilling views of God presented In this chapter, in which God is seen in his great works of mercy and of power in behalf of his people. Herein lie the special instruction and the great value of this wonderful chapter. In point of literary merit, its beauty and sub- limity are of the highest order, and challenge our intense admira- tion ; but far above and better than all those beauties is the sub- lime moral lesson it teaches, viz., that if any " good man would fix his hand upon the skies and bid earth roll, nor feel her idle whirl," the rational mode of reaching this sublime repose of faith is to study the great works of God's power and mercy as found in the historic pages of his word, and as first revealed from heaven in the ways of his providence and miracle-working power toward his people in the days of old. This study of God, deep, appreciative, prayerful, with the aid of his teaching Spirit, must be the one great condition on our part — a trustful, believing study, with a loving and appropriating faith. Such a study of God, with such help from his Spirit, give their utmost vividness and power to those great truths respecting God which we need to see and feel as realities. Oh, it is beyond measure blessed to have the soul thus filled with the practical impression of those truths ! Then what was only as a dream before, becomes reality, clearly seen and deeply felt, and then it becomes natural and easy to adjust one's heart and life to the demands of those truths. They call for implicit faith in God ; impressed by such views of God, and drawn by his Spirit, we seem spontaneously to yield it. So Habakkuk found his heart full of the simplest, sweetest trust in God, and in God alone — ^in God, though every thing else should fail. It should have been more distinctly noted that the fig-tree and the vine stand here to represent, not themselves alone, but every other earthly good. They stand for home and dear ones, for country and sanctuary, for safety of person and for dear life. Although all these should fail, yet, said the prophet, will I rejoice in the Lord; I will joy in the God of my salvation. In the same spirit, a psalmist said : " My flesh and my heart faileth ; but God is the strength of my heart, and my portion forever " (Ps. 73 : 26). The reader will scarcely need to be reminded that any and 264 HABAKKUK.— CHAP. III. every one who cometh to the knowledge of tliis sublime example of faith may reach it for himself personally by the same steps. There is no exclusiveness in this gift of faith ; it cometh alike to the simple-hearted child and to the wisest philosopher — to each and to all who heartily receive God as their supreme portion, and fully open their souls to his teaching, moulding Spirit. And who will not prize this simple yet mighty faith? To whom would it not be a blessing high above all other blessings possible ? It is like pos- sessing and inheriting the Infinite God ! This prophet foresaw that soon he should own no vine or fig-tree, no herd or flock ; but he was more than satisfied, for he had (it might almost be said, he owned) — he had, as his own to trust in and enjoy, the Infinite and ever-blessed God ! When flesh and heart shall fail us, and all of earth shall be fading fast away from our mortal vision, there will be at least one hour in which it will be more to us than all the universe besides to have this God as our own 1 '\\ ZEPHA]S"IAH. INTRODUCTION". Of this prophet, his own introduction gives us the names of his immediate ancestors through four generations, of whom, however, nothing is known to us certainly except their names. It gives also the much more important statement that this word of the Lord came to him in the days of Josiah, king of Judah. Josiah's reign of thirty-one years fell, b. o. 642-611. A careful comparison of this Book of Zephaniah, with the history of Josiah's reign, as found, 2 Kings chapters 22 and 23, and yet more fully 2 Chron., chapters 34 and 35, will throw yet more light upon the precise date of his writings, and upon the much more important point of its definite aim and purpose. Let it he home in mind that after the great reformation wrought by Ilezekiah with the aid of Isaiah and other prophets during his reign of twenty-nine years, a fearful relapse followed during Manasseh's long reign of fifty-five years ; that the brief history sets forth in very strong terms the horrible influence of this wicked king who " made Jerusalem and Judah do worse than the heathen " (2 Chron. 33 : 9) ; that his repentance occurring late in life, while it may have saved his own soul in answer to a godly father's prayers, yet seems scarcely to have at all arrested the strong currents of national wickedness ; that his son Amon, reigning two years most wickedly, and then losing his life by conspiracy among his own servants, must have left the nation yet waxing worse and worse ; and then that Josiah, coming to the throne at the tender age of eight years, began to seek after the God of his fathers at the age of sixteen, commenced a vigorous reform yet four years later, 12 ZEPHANIAH.— CHAP. I. i. e.^ at the age of twenty, which was the twelfth year of his reign, and had gone over the work with commendable thoroughness at the end of six years' labor, i. e., in the eighteenth year of his reign. That was the era of a remarkable passover, kept with great solem- nity and with hopeful results. But the roots of wickedness had gone deep into the national life. Hence this reform, as to the mass of the nation, could not have penetrated much beneath the surface. This reign of the good Josiah was the Lord's last call of the nation to repentance. Toward this result, Zephaniah and Jere- miah lent their aid — the latter beginning to prophesy in the thir- teenth year of Josiah, and the former probably about the same time. Zephaniah (1 : 4) predicts — " I will cutoff the remnant of Baal from this place," &c., and the history states (2 Chron. 34: 3, 4) that Josiah began this very work in his twelfth year, and closed it in his eighteenth. It may also be noted that Zephaniah (2 : 13-15) pre- dicts the fall of Nineveh, which occurred b. c. 625 — i. e., in the seventeenth year of Josiah. It was to aid King Josiah in his great work .of reforming the nation and of saving it from ruin under the long-accumulating -^Tath of God, that Zephaniah was commis- sioned to reiterate the solemn declarations of Jehovah — "I will utterly consume this whole land " — especially every vestige of its idolatry, and not sparing its fearfully corrupt and wicked people. This is the one great thought throughout the first chapter. The next chapter heightens the force of this dread decree by assuring the people that the adjacent nations sunk low in general corruption and idol worship, were also doomed to fearful devastations — the Philistines, Moab, Ammon, Ethiopia, and Assyria, with her proud capital, Nineveh. In this general sweep of desolating judgments, Judah could by no means hope to escape, save by earnest and thor- ough repentance before God. Chapter 3 sets forth yet more fully the extreme corruption of her prophets, priests, and princes, but closes with merciful promises of salvation in a future day for the remnant of his people. CHAPTER I. EoE the general scope of this chapter, the reader is referred to 2 Kings 23 : 20, 27. Closely following a very full account of the great reformation effected by Josiah, the historian says : " Notwith- standing, the Lord tm-ned not from the fierceness of his great wrath ZEPHANIAH.— CHAP. I. ' 267 wherewitli Ms anger was kindled against Judah, becanse of all tlie provocations that Manasseh had provoked him withal. And the Lord vsaid, " I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there." 1. The word of the Loed which came unto Zepha- niah the son of Cushi, the son of Geclaliah, the son of Amariah, the son of Ilizldah, in the days of Josiah the son of Amon, king of Judah. 2. I will utterly consume all things from off the land, saith the Lord. 3. I will consume man and beast ; I will consume the fowls of the heayen, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumbling-blocks with the wicked ; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the Loed. See the general introduction. The stumbling-blocks are here, the idol-gods which had proved such a stumbling-block of ruin to the people. This shows that the reformation under Josiah entkely failed to save the land from its sins, and hence, from its deserved and fearful doom. 4. I will also stretch out mine hand upon Judah and upon all the inhabitants of Jerusalem ; and I will cut off the remnant of Baal from this place, and the name of the Chemarims with the priests ; God would utterly finish the destruction of Baal, including the idols, their priests, and their worshippers, and would exterminate the very " name of the Chemarims." This word — meaning priest, as one who goes about in black or mourning, an ascetic — came from Syria, and was always applied by the Jews to the priests of idols. The history (2 Kings 23 : 5) states that Josiah put down the Chem- arims, whom the kings of Judah had ordained to burn incense in the high places," &c. ; but ultimately, the Lord, by the long captivity in Babylon, made much more thorough work in rooting them out from among his people and burying tljeir very name in oblivion. The last words of the verse, " with the priests," refers to Jevr- ish priests — probably such as professed to serve the true God, but had apostatized into idol-worship. 6. And them that worship the host of heaven, upon the house-tops ; and them that worship and that swear by the Loed, and that swear by Malcham ; 6. And them that are turned, back from the Loed ; and those that have not sought the Loed, nor inquired for him. 268 ZEPHANIAH.— CHAR I. " The host of heaven " were the heavenly bodies, the sim, moon, stars, and planets. This form of idolatry, Sabianism (from Saba *) (used for the host of heaven), was very ancient, and widely extended throughout the East. The worship was offered on the house-tops, possibly for secrecy, but more probably for the sake of a better view of the objects of their worship. The next class of worshippers, " wor- ship, swearmg by the Lord and swearing by their Mng " — a term here supposed to refer to Moloch. That is, they mix together the ostensible worship of Jehovah with the real worship of Moloch, whom they practically recognized as their king. To swear by Jehovah is to recognize his supreme divinity, at least professedly. They rendered the same recognition to Moloch also. Of course such men render no true worship to Jehovah, and he dooms them to fall with the guiltiest idolaters. V. G describes them in more general terms — all who have turned back, having once .professed to serve him, and those who have not sought him — in every age a gi*eat and fearfully guilty class. Y. Hold tliy peace at the presence of tlie Lord God : for the day of the Lord is at hand : for the Lord hath prepared a sacrifice, he hath bid his guests. "Hold thy peace before the face of the Lord God" enjoins silence in the spirit of profound reverence and solemn awe. See a similar sentiment, Amos 6 : 10. The reason Assigned is, " because the day of the Lord is near," a day of judgment on the people. " The Lord hath prepared a sacrifice " — ^liere in the sense of a great slaughter, as in Isa. 34 : G : " The Lord hath a sacrifice in Bozrah, and a great slaughter in the land of Idumea.'^ The original word rendered " bid," t means to sanctify, but here in the sense in which war was declared with religious solemnities, and the warriors prac- tically sworn in and consecrated to their work. The Lord's " guests " — his called ones, as the original word means — are here, not men invited to dine at a festival, but those whom he had called in his providence to be the executioners of his vengeance on the wicked in this great slaughter — in the case, the Chaldeans. 8. And it shall come to pass in the day of the Lord's sacrifice, that I will punish the princes, and the king's children, and all such 'as are clothed with strange ap- parel. Eoyalty in Judah had been deep in guilt and should be first in punishment. In the phrase, "strange apparel," strange does not mean lincouth or surprising, but foreign. Indeed, the words " strange " and "stranger " in our Bible always means foreign, per- taining to Gentiles and not to Jews. The idea here is that the adoption and use of the foreign costume in dress indicated apostasy ZEPHANIAE.— CHAP. I. 269 from God and a love for the institutions and customs of the heathen. Hence it marked men out for special plagues from the Lord. 9. In tlie same day also will I punish all those that leap on the threshold, which fill their masters' houses with violence and deceit. The phrase, "those that leap on the threshold," is explained variously by commentators. Some suppose an allusion to the wor- shippers of Dagon (1 Sam. 5 : 4, 5), who, because their helpless idol fell before the ark of God, and broke his neck over the threshold, took care forever after not to step on the threshold but over it. I see no analogy between this case and that. Here are persons who leap, not over^ but upon the threshold. The parallel clause — "who fill their masters' houses with violence and deceit" — i. m her fruit. 11. And I called for a drought upon the land, and upon the mountains, and upon the corn, and upon the new wine, and upon the oil, and upon that which the ground bringeth forth, and upon men, and upon cattle, and upon all the labor of the hands. The phrase "blow upon it," some interpreters render (as the margin has it) blow it away. The preposition rentlered upon^ strongly favors our received translation. The sense will then be — Even after you had gathered your harvests home, I blighted them as by the breath of my mouth. The word " r«^w," " ye run every man to his own house," indicates that their hearts were not in God's house, nor toward it, but toward their own. It was specially characteristic of the entire age before the coming of Christ that God's moral government over men in this world was made manifest by present retrilmtion. It was never intended that those present retri- butions should be perfect, or should supersede the necessity of a fu- ture state in which all deficiencies would be made up ; but it was the design of God to make his government palpable, so that all men should have tangible, visible evidence of its reality. Obviously there was indefinitely more need of present retribution then than now. It was a sort of compensation to offset their inferior light respecting God, duty, and salvation. The genius of that whole dispensation in regard to the point now in hand — present retribution for right and wrong doing, visited on the people in blessings or in curses — is set forth strongly in the latter chapters of Deuteronomy, especially chapter 28. These verses of Haggai presuppose this type of God's moral government over men in this world. 12. Then Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, with all the rem- nant of the people, obeyed the voice of the Loed their God, and the words of Haggai the prophet, as the Loed their God had sent him, and the people did fear before the Loed. 13. Then spake Haggai the Loed's messenger in the Loed's message unto the people, saying, I am with you, saith the Loed. 14. And the Loed stirred up the spirit of Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and the spirit of Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, and the HAGGAI.— CHAP. U. spirit of all the remnant of tlie people ; and they came and did work in the house of the Lokd of hosts, their God, 15. In the four and twentieth day of the sixth month, in the second year of Darius the king. It is pleasant to note that these messages from the Lord pro- duced the desired result. The Lord stirred up the spirit of both rulers and people, and they took hold earnestly of the neglected work of rebuilding the temple. Twenty-four days sufficed to arouse them and to make the necessary preparations. The masses of the people were far more obedient to the voice of God than before the captivity — furnishing yet another case of blessings coming through sore chastisement. " Before I was afflicted, I went astray, but now have I kept thy word." CHAPTER II. The distinct portions of this chapter are strongly marked : (1.) The portion (vs. 1-9) which speaks to those hearts that were sad and depressed by the greatly inferior glory of this temple compared with that built by Solomon. (2.) Vs. 10-19, designed to show that their late neglect to build the house of God had vitiated all their labors, and brought a blight from the Lord upon all their fruits ; and (3.) Vs. 20-23, encouraging their rulers, and confirming the great promise made (vs. 6-9). 1. In the seventh month, in the one and twentieth day of the month, came the word of the Lokd by the prophet Haggai, saying, The reader will note that this date is one month, less three days, after they began upon the work of rebuilding. (See 1 : 15.) With what had been done in the former effort, commenced some fourteen years before, the work of this month sufficed to show that this temple must be greatly "inferior in splendor and in all its ap- pointments, to that which had stood from the time of Solomon down to the captivity. 2. Speak now to Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Jndah, and to Joshua the son of Josedech the high priest, and to the re-sidue of the people, saying, 3. W ho is left among you that saw this house in her first glory ? and how do ye see it now ? is it not in your eyes in comparison of it as nothing ? A few patriarchs of venerable age remained to remember the glory of that first temple which had now lain desolate about sixty- HAGGAI.— CHAP. II. 287 eight years. The Lord calls their attention to the contrast between that and this. " How do ye see this now ? Is not this in your eyes, compared with that, as nothing? " Ezra. 3 : 12, 13, gives us a touching allusion to this scene, blending the joy of the young people with the grief of their fathers — the shoutings of the one class and the sad waitings of the other — each swelling up, and perhaps each exciting the other, until the noise was heard afar, and men could not distinguish the shouts of joy from the outcries of grief — a scene not soon forgotten by either the joyous or the sad ones of that day. The Lord calls attention to the wide contrast between this latter house and the former because he had something to say about it, as we shall see. 4. Yet now be strong, O Zerubabbel, saitb the Loed ; and be strong, O Joshua, son of Josedecb the high priest ; and be strong, all ye people of the land, saith the Lord, and work : for I am with you, saith the Lord of hosts : The first thing he would say is. Be strong of heart, and never yield to depression; "be strong and work," for I am with you, and my presence ought to outweigk greater and more discouraging contrasts than this which saddens your hearts to-day. Shall it not be enough for you that I am with you ? 5. According to the word that I covenanted with you when ye came out of Egypt, so my Spirit remain- eth among you ; fear ye not. The proper construction of the term "word," in the phrase rendered " according* to the word that I covenanted," &c., pre- sents diflSculties. There seems to be no authority in the original for the words " according to," or for the idea that the continued presence of the Spirit is in accordance with that original covenant made when the nation came forth from Egypt. This may or not be true : it is not expressed clearly and beyond a doubt here. On the contrary, this passage, almost beyond a doubt, afiirms (1.) That the covenant made at Sinai is still in force, no less since the captivity than before ; and (2.) That God's Spirit also still abides with the people ; so that for both reasons the people ought not to fear, but be strong and of good courage. With such a covenant of promise, and such a present, indwelling Spirit, why should they bewail the lack of those external splendors which pertained to the temple of Solomon ? 6. For thus saith the Lord of hosts ; Yet once, it is a little while, and I will shake the heavens, and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land '^ Exegetically, the chief diflSculty in this verse turns on the word rendered " once." The choice seems to me to lie between these 288 HAGGAI.— CHAP. II. two constructions: (1.) "Yet once more, and that very soon, I will sLake," &c. ; or (2). " It is yet but one short period, and I will shake," &c. In the latter case, the word one (this is the usual sense of the Hebrew) is only equivalent to the article. Of this usage there are some examples. The choice between these two construc- tions is a matter of no great importance as to the ultimate sense. The first construction may be thought to imply once more, and once only. The " shaking of the heavens, the earth, the sea, and the dry land," must be taken in the figurative and not the literal sense, to indicate, not an earthquake, reaching far out through boundless space, but convulsions among the great nationalities of the world — Assyrian, Chaldean, Medo-Persian, and Grecian — to pave the way for the coming of Messiah's kingdom. They dash one against an- other, each in succession overwhelming its immediate predecessor, but each revolution ripening the world for the coming of Messiah. In a similar strain Ezekiel says (21 : 27) : " I will overturn, overturn, overturn, and it shall be no more, until lie come whose right it is, and I will give it him." In this view of the sense, the next verse will be explanatory — " Yea, I will shake all nations," &c. 7. And I will sliake all nations, and tlie desire of all nations shall come : and I will fill this house with glory, saith the Loed of hosts. 8. The silver is mine, and the gold is mine, saith the Lord of hosts. The test word in verse 7 is " desire.^'* Is this a synonym for the Messiah? Is it only another name for the same exalted man^ thought and spoken of here as one " desired by aU nations " ? So the current sentiment of the Church and so its sacred songs have for the most part assumed. This has been a pleasant and cherished interpretation. I must confess that I have felt its strong attrac- tions. But I have been compelled by the force of grammatical and exegetical reasons to modify somewhat this interpretation, yet not so as ultimately to lessen but rather to augment the richness of its spiritual significance. The usual construction, which interprets the word "desire" as meaning precisely the Messiah, must be re- jected : (1.) First and mainly, because the verb is plural — " they come, even the desire of all the nations." The word "desire" must therefore be a noun of multitude, i. e., a noun embracing in its meaning not one object alone, but many. There seems to be no way to get over this diflSculty so long as w^e make " desire " synony- mous with Messiah. (2.) The scope of thought is not congenial to its strict applica- tion to the Messiah, especially as seen in the declaration, "The silver is mine, and the gold is mine, saith the Lord of hosts." Silver and gold were eminently absent, not present, in the personal HAGGAL— CHAP. 11. 289 life of the man of Nazareth. Yet in this prophecy silver and gold must stand in a close relation to tlie sense of the clause " the De- sire of all nations shall come." A better construction is possible, and indeed unobjectionable. Let it be borne in mind that this entire passage grows out of the contrast between the meagreness of the new temple and the wealth and splendor of the old, and out of the consequent discouragement and depression of the Lord's peo- ple. He calls their special attention to this wide contrast (v. 3). He proceeds to intimate (vs. 4, 5) that the absence of gold and silver, and of material splendor in this new temple, may be abun- dantly compensated by his spiritual blessings; by the fact that "/ am with 2^0 ?f," and the further fact that the covenant and the Spirit are still remaining. He advances yet in the same line of thought — I am about to convulse the nations — to revolutionize the state of the world, and thus, as the ultimate outcome, the desirable things of all nations — their wealth, beauty, and glory — shall come to Zion ; and " T will fill this temple with glory, saitli the Lord of hosts." The silver and the gold of all the world are mine, saith the Lord of hosts, and by the might of my power over the hearts of men and over all human society, it shall be consecrated to Immanuel'* kingdom. Special stress must be accorded to this frequent repe- tition of the phrase, " saith the Lord of hosts," closing each of three successive verses, 7, 8, 9. Let it also be borne in mind that, according to this construction, the Lord speaks precisely to that which constituted the chief solicitude of the pious Jews. They were saying in their heart : How much we do miss the riches — the silver, the gold, the cedars, the tapestry — of that ancient temple ! When and how can we ever rear a temple worthy of the God of our fathers ? We are very poor ; shall we ever be rich enough to build and adorn a temple worthy of our God ? To this the Lord very kindly and pertinently replies : Give yourselves no solicitudes in that line. I am the Lord God of hosts ; I rule this wide world, and I can command all its silver and gold when I will for my king- dom. And I shall do it / In support of this construction may be urged (1.) It gives the ordinary and established sense to the word rendered " desire.'''' This word is used mainly for those things which worldly men desire. (2.) It meets the exigencies of the plural verb, since it embraces in its idea many things, not one only. (3.) It is, as we have seen, fuUy in keeping with the previous con- text — the train of thought which occasioned this prophecy, and which introduced this passage. (4.) It is equally in harmony with the subsequent context— jfilling this house with glory, and God's claiming the silver and the gold of the world as his own. (5.) It is also entirely in harmony with other and more ancient prophecies, e. ff., Isa. 60. To set this in its full light would demand the whole chapter, in which we read : " The abundance of the sea shall be converted unto thee " — " all they from Sheba shall come, bringing gold and incense"—" the isles shall wait for me, and the ships of Tarshish first, to bring tliy sons from far, their, silver and their gold 13 200 HAGGAI.— CHAP. II. with them, nnto the name of the Lord thy God " — " the glory of Lebanon shall come unto thee to beantify the place of my sanctu- ary, and I will make the place of my feet glorious," &c., (fee. The same strain runs through the seventy-second Psalm : " The kings of Tarshish and of the isles shall bring' presents ; the kings of Sheba and Seba shall oflfer gifts." Let it be said very dis- tinctly that in this construction of the passage, I do not exclude but include the Messiah. One advantage of this construction is that under it we get, not the Messiah alone, but much more be- sides. It is only under his reign and after the power of his cross over human hearts has been gloriously developed among the great and distant nations of the earth, that all the silver and gold of the world shall be brought and laid at his feet for use in the pur- poses of his spiritual kingdom. Even yet, how little of the real wealth of nominally Christian nations — ^nay, more, how little of the wealth of the visible Church is truly consecrated to the Saviour of men ! It shall yet be far otherwise than this ! Prophecy cannot receive its entire fullilment until the wealth of the world shall press forward voluntarily (so to speak) to lay itself at Immanuel's feet, to be used so that he may soonest and best see of the travail of his soul, and may have most of that "joy set before him," in the con- version of myriads to his love and service. It may be asked : Do you expect, in the good time yet coming, to see a temple built with cedars from Lebanon, and beautified with the silver and the gold of all the earth ? 1 answer, Nothing can be further from my thought than the going back of Christianity to real Judaism. The New Testament "temple of God" is the loving and pure heart wherein God dwells (2 Cor. 6 : 16). In this temple, by another figure. Christians are themselves "living stones" (1 Pet. 2:5), and in this temple "the sacrifices of God are a broken heart and a contrite spirit." Of course, Jewish prophets must think and write in Jewish symbols and terms. Good Christian sense must find i\\Q spiritual meaning of those terms and symbols — ^the New Testament and its teaching Spirit furnishing the key. 9. The glorj of this latter house shall be greater than of the former, saith the Loed of hosts : and in this place will I give peace, saith the Loed of hosts. To the first clause, two diflterent interpretations have been given ; (1.) That the " latter house " is that of Zerubbabel, the former that of Solomon ; and the thing afiSrmed, that the glory of this built under Zerubbabel, shall be greater than the glory of that built by Solomon ; (2.) That the temple of Solomon is out of mind, and that the antithesis really lies between the former and the latter glory of this same temple then in building — its "former glory "being what it had under Zerubbabel, and onward down through what remained of the age before Christ ; and the latter, that which it shaU attain when the desirable things of all nations shall come into it ; when the wealth and beauty of the world shall be consecrated to Imman- HAGGAI.— CHAP. II. 291 nel, and tlie Prince of Peace shall reign in his own spiritual tem- ple, filling it with the glory of his own presence. The latter is doubtless the true construction : (1.) Because it is precisely what the words in their order mean, and must mean. They stand thus: '' Great shall be the glory of this house — the latter more than the former, saith Jehovah of hosts." (2.) Because this construction alone answers to the drift of the context, the very thing that the Lord is saying in this passage being this — The meagre glory of this temple, as ye now see it, shall give place to a glory vastly greater when the wealth and beauty of all the nations shall be brought into it. That is, the era of spiritual power, beauty, and glory, shall immensely surpass all the external splendors of Judaism ; the spirit shall eclipse the letter ; the inward be more and better than the outward ; the homage of countless warm and living hearts shall more adorn and glorify God's temple than all the gold of Ophir, the smoke of incense and the blood of thousands of bullocks and of rams. "In this place will I give peace" — can have but one interpretation ; — not tranquillity as opposed to the disturbances of war ; not peace of mind as opposed to agitation and distress : but including all these and much more, the abstract word peace, used for the concrete, it means the great Peacemaker^ the great author and Prince of Peace, the world's pacificator as toward its abused, offended Maker ; — the Shiloh of earlier prophecy, repeatedly foretold under precisely this appellation. (See Micah 5 : 5 and Isa. 9 : 6, T.) This naturally completes the evidence in proof that this entire passage refers to the then future times of the Messiah. 10. In the four and twentieth day of the ninth month, in the second year of Darius, came the word of the Lord by Haggai the prophet, saying, 11. Thus saith the Lord of hosts, Ask now the priests concerning the law, saying, 12. If one bear holy flesh in the skirt of his garment, and with his skirt do touch bread, or pottage, or wine, or oil, or any meat, shall it be holy ? And the priests answered and said, ISTo. 13. Then said Haggai, If one that is unclean by a dead body touch any of these, shall it be unclean ? And the priests answered and said. It shall be unclean. 14. Then answered Haggai, and said. So is this peo- ple, and so is this nation before me, saith the Lord ; and so is every work of their hands ; and that which they offer here is unclean. The priests being the authorized expounders of the ceremonial law, the Lord directs the people to propound to them two ques- tions : (1.) In case a priest, bearing holy flesh in his garment, brings 292 HAGGAI.— CHAP. 11. it in contact with any tMng else, does it impart its own sacredness to whatsoever it touches ? To this, they answer, No. Ceremo- nial holiness is not imparted hy the touch. (2.) Over against this is the second question : Does a man, who has been made unclean by contact with a dead body, impart his own uncleanness by the touch? They answer. Yes. Ceremonial uncleanness is imparted by the touch. This doctrine of the ceremonial law, the Lord ap- plies to the people. They had sinned in neglecting to build the Lord's temple. By reason of this sin, their moral state became analogous to that of the man ceremonially unclean. This sin im- parted its moral character to all they did. The Lord could not take pleasure in the labors of their hands ; it all became unclean. On the other hand, if they should do any good thing, it could not carry its good quality over to any thing else they might do. Under the law of God, works of supererogation are unknown. 15. And now, I pray yon, consider from this day and upwards, from before a stone was laid upon a stone in the temple of the Lord : 16. Since those days were, when one came to an heap of twenty measures, there were hut ten : when one came to the press-fat for to draw out fifty vessels out of the press, there were hut twenty. IT. I smote you with blasting and with mildew and with hail in all the labors of your hands ; yet ye turned not to me, saith the Loed. The Lord would have them review the period from that day backward to the point where the building of the temple commenced, and so from that day onward to the present, and observe how fear- fully their harvests had been blighted. " I smote you with blasting and blight, yet ye moved not toward me " — hterally, " there was nothing of you to me." Up to this point his chastisements had proved altogether unavailing. 18. Consider now from this day and upward, from the four and twentieth day of the ninth month, even from the day that the foundation of the Lord's temple was laid, consider it, 19. Is the seed yet in the barn ? yea, as yet the vine, and the fig-tree, and the pomegranate, and the olive-tree, hath not brought forth : from this day will I bless you. Here is another call to examine the course of the Lord's provi- dence toward them throughout the interval from the day when they commenced laying the foundations of the Lord's house to that hour. Is the seed yet in the barn ? No. Planting-time is past, and you have planted ; but have you any harvests of any sort ? Not HAGGAL— CHAP. II. 293 any. But now that ye have resumed this labor upon the temple, from this day I will bless you. Note and see. 20. And again the word of the Loed came unto Plaggai in the four and twentieth day of the month, saying, 21. Speak to Zerubbabel, governor of Judah, saying, I will shake the heavens and the earth ; 22. And I will overthrow the throne of kingdoms, and I will destroy the strength of the kingdoms of the heatlj.en ; and I will overthrow the chariots, and those that ride in them ; and the horses and their riders shall come down, every one by the sword of his brother. This message, sent especially to Zerubbabel, bears the same date with that immediately preceding, and seems intended to supple- ment and reaffirm the prophecy recorded (vs. ^-^). It is quite plain here that the " shaking of the heavens and the earth " is the same thing as " overthrowing the throne of the kingdoms," and has no application other than this. God will cast down vast armies, over- throwing chariots and their riders, horses and horsemen, and turn- ing a man against his brother, so that God's enemies should give their strength to mutual slaughter. Thus those vast, ungodly king- doms of the earth are doomed to fall. 23. In that day saith the Lokd of hosts, will I take thee, O Zerubbabel, my servant, the son of Shealtiel, saith the Loed, and will make thee as a signet ; for I have chosen thee, saith the Loed of hosts. But throughout this slaughter of his foes, God will protect his friends. He indicates this by saying that their governor shall be as his signet-ring upon his finger. This implies care, love, and protec- tion. No doubt the Lord intended this promise should be good to the successors of Zerubbabel ; — good for his people so long as they put their trust in him, whoever their Zerubbabel may be. ZEOHAEIAH, INTEODUOTION". The usual preliminarj questions of personal history — date, occa- sion, and special object — are readily settled in the case of the proph- et Zechariah. He began to prophesy in the eighth month of tho second year of Darius Hystaspes, b. o. 520, contemporary with Hag- gai, when Zcrubbabel was governor of Judah, and Joshua was high priest. At this period, the great matters of interest in the visible kingdom of God were the rebuilding of Jerusalem, the resettlement of the returned and still-returning captives from Chaldea, and yet more especially, the rebuilding of the temple, and the culture of the faith and religious life of the people composing the new community. In many respects it was a time of laying again the foundations of re- ligion and morals, and of planting anew those institutions which were to be the fountains of their future religious life, and hence of their abiding prosperity. Consequently, there was abundant work for the prophets of the Lord. It is pleasant to note that their work was more hopeful and less discouragmg than that of their predecessors for many generations. The people were more impres- sible; the word of the Lord was effective; the spirit of obedience, and not of rebellion, was in the main predominant. Hence, most of the messages sent from the Lord by Zechariah were of cheerful tone, breathing far more of promise than of threatening. The reader wOl notice in this prophet (relatively to the whole amoxmt of his writings) more predictions of the Messiah than in any other. The people were at first a small and feeble band, estimated in comparison with other tribes and sovereignties about them. They could scarcely have stood their ground against these hostile powers, ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. I. 295 save under the protection of the Persian throne. In this throne, G-od had remarkably provided for their security. Hence, they had great reason to feel that in this respect their salvation and national life were from the Lord. In the same line of thought, the Lord often revealed to them that Greater Patron and more glorious Refuge, ere long to appear in the person of Immanuel, the real lOng of Zion. The first six chapters are distinguished from the rest of the book, and indeed from most of the other prophetical writings of the Old Testament, by the blending of symbol and vision. The things presented to the prophet in vision were highly symbolic. Most of these symbols were so far explained to the prophet as to give us an adequate clue to their significance. Some critics have assumed that the diversity in the point of symbolic vision, between the first six chapters and the remaining eight, is sufficient proof that the lat- ter portion was not written by the same Zechariah. The only valid ground for this assumption must be another further back, viz. that, if God reveals any truth to a given prophet by symbolic visions, he must pursue this precise method and no other without variation throughout that prophet's life. But what authority can be found for such an assumption ? Does it obtain in the case of the prophet Amos, or Daniel, or Ezekiel, or Jeremiah? I look upon this assumption as one of the follies, not to say absurdities, of hyper- criticism. Tlie book throughout is richly instructive, fraught with spiritual life and power, and consolatory to the feeble but trusting children of God. CHAPTER I. This chapter contains three distinct portions: vs. 1-6 derive admonition for the people from the case of their fathers whom the Lord sent into captivity for their sins; vs. 8-17 is the first symbolic vision, viz., of horses and their riders, and vs. 17-21 the second, of four horns, and of smiths to break those horns in pieces and destroy their power for harm. 1. In tlie eighth month, in the second year of Darius, came the word of the Lord unto Zechariah, the son of Barachiah, the son of Iddo the prophet, saying, Zechariah is said (Ezra 5 : 1) to be the son of Iddo the prophet. We must suppose that ''son "is used there in its less rigid sense, for grandson. Iddo is perhaps made prominent there as his an- cestor, because he was a prophet. 296 ZECHAEIAH.— CHAP. I. 2. The LoED hath been sore displeased with youi fiithers. • The statements of the history respecting this sore displeasure of God against their fathers are abundant and very strong. (See 2 Chron. 36 : 11-16, and 2 Chron. 33, and 2 Kings 21 : 2-16.) 3. Therefore, say thou unto them, Thus saith the LoKD of hosts ; Turn ye unto me, saith the Loed of hosts, and I will turn unto you, saith the Loed of hosts. In view of God's wrath against their fathers and its results in the desolation of their city and land, the Lord commissions Zech- ariah to say to the people then present: "Turn unto me in penitence, and I will turn unto you in forgiving love and mercy." This is the standing law of God's moral kingdom in this world of probation. The reader will notice the frequent yet not " vain repetition " of the divine title, " the Lord of hosts," the Great Euler of the celestial armies, the King of the universe. 4. Be ye not as your fathers, unto whom the fomier Erophets have cried, saying, Thus saith the Loed of osts ; Turn ye now from your evil ways, and from your evil doings : but they did not hear, nor hearken unto me, saith the jLoed. 5. Your fathers, where are they ? and the prophets, do they live for ever ? 6. But, my words and my statutes which I com- manded my servants the prophets, did they not take hold of your fathers? And' they returned and said. Like as the Loed of hosts thought to do unto us, according to our ways and according to our doings, so hath he dealt with us. "With great pertinence and force the Lord exhorts them not to be as their fathers, stiff-necked, obdurate, reckless of the warnings and entreaties sent them of God by the former prophets. WTiere are those fathers now ? Gone from the world where they became so fearfully hardened in their sins ; gone from the land they pol- luted by their abominations and cursed by their persistence in rebellion ; gone to their righteous but most fearful doom ! It were well for the children to think often of those fathers and ask. Where are they ? The prophets, too, having served their generation amid sore trials and heart-griefs unutterable, had gone to their blissful reward. Let the people consider! Did not the words which God sent by those former prophets " ^al^^o?^ of your fathers?" Did they slip off as things of loose grasp, and prove void of re- sult? Did not those awful threatenings hold on, and have not you yourselves seen and felt the terrible judgments which those ZECHAEIAH.— CHAP. I. 297 words portended ? They themselves were forced to admit this. They returned and said, i. ^., they took a new and better view of the case under the pressure of appalling facts, and then they said — All that God thought and threatened to do unto us as a nation, he has done ! Let their children take warning ! Y. Upon tlie four and twentietli day of tlie eleventh month, which is the month Sebat, in the second year of Darius, came the word of the Lokd unto Zechariah, the son of Earachiah, the son of Iddo the prophet, saying, 8. I saw by night, and behold a man riding upon a red horse, and he stood among the myrtle-trees that were in the bottom ; and behind him were there red horses, speckled, and white. 9. Then said I, O my lord, what are these ? And the angel that talked with me said unto me, I will shew thee what these he. 10. And the man that stood among the myrtle-trees answered and said. These are they whom the Loed hath sent to walk to and fro through the earth. 11. And they answered the angel of the Loed that stood among the myrtle-trees, and said. We have walked to and fro through the earth, and behold, all the earth sitteth still, and is at rest. 12. Then the angel of the Loed answered and said, O Loed of hosts, how long wilt thou not have mercy on Jerusalem and on the cities of Judah, against which thou hast had indignation these threescore and ten years % 13. And the Loed answered tlie angel that talked with me with good words and comfortable words. 14. So the angel that communed with me said unto me. Cry thou, saying. Thus saith the Loed of hosts ; I am jealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with a great jealousy. 15. And I am very sore displeased with the heathen that are at ease : for I was but a little displeased, and they helped forward the afEiction. 16. Therefore thus saith the Loed ; I am returned to Jerusalem with mercies : mine house shall be built in it, saith the Loed of hosts, and a line ^hall be stretched forth upon Jerusalem. 298 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. I. 17. Cry yet, saying, Thus saith tlie Lord of hosts ^ My cities through prosperity shall yet be spread abroad ; and the Loed shall yet comfort Zion, and shall yet choose Jerusalem. These verses comprise one entire and distinct vision, the first in a series, and of symbolic character. The symbols represent the executive forces by whicli the Lord administers liis providential government over the nations. The special aim here is— (1.) To assure the Hebrew people that God had more judgments to send on the nations that had oppressed them ; and (2.) That he would greatly augment the growth and prosperity of Zion. So much for the general scope of the passage. As to the particulars, let us note that this is a night-vision, presented to the mind's eye of the prophet by special divine agencies. That men riding on horses are used to represent the executive forces of God's reign over the nations is due (we may suppose) to the use of post-borses as vehicles of the royal mandates, as the nerves of communication (so to speak) from the working brain on the throne to the remotest organs of his will in alibis distant provinces. They seem to be thought of here rather as explorers to observe and report, than as executioners. The reader will better understand this representation if he will be at the pains to classify the personages of the scene — what are sometimes called" the dramatis personso " — thus: (1.) The man riding upon a red horse (v. 8), who stood (on horseback) among the myrtle-trees in the shaded vale, at the head of others, also on horses of various colors ; the same who (v. 10) explained and said, " These are they whom the Lord hath sent," &c., to whom the other horse- men report (v. 11) ; and to whom prayer is oiFered as "the Lord of hosts " (v. 12) ; and who answers so kindly (v. 13). This can be no other than the uncreated angel — the very Son of God, so often if not always the God revealed and made manifest in all the ages before his incarnation. (2.) Xext are his attendants, on horses, representing angels proper; those "ministers of his who do his pleasure," and whom he continually employs in the administration of his providential government on earth. They appear (v. 8) where it must be assumed that the horses have riders upon them ; also (v. 11), they report what they have seen in their mission to and fro through the earth. (3.) The revealing angel, specially attendant upon the prophet as his interpreter, usually called "the angel that talked with me," e. g.^ v. 9, 13, and also in v. 14, where our translators have given the same Hebrew word another rendering, " that communed with me." It is the same aagel who offers the prayer (v. 12), since the answer (v. 13) is given to him. That he offers this prayer is due to his strong sympathy with the prophet, to whom he was a sort of guardian angel. This grouping of the characters of this scene will help the reader to understand its sig- nificance. The horses and their riders are seen among the myrtle- trees in a shady vale — both the myrtles and the vale indicating the ZECHAKIAH.— CHAP. I. 299 low and liumble condition of God's people and kingdom, especially at that time, yet showing us plainly that however low and humble in human estimation, Ood was in the midst of them^ and did not disdain to reveal precisely there his glorious Son, and under him the angels clothed in might as the executive servants of his reign among the nations. No other speciality of meaning can be safely assigned to the color of these horses, except that red commonly indicates war-scenes of blood, and that the variety may suggest thai God's agency embraces all varieties of manifestation — curses and blessings, war and peace. The prophet asks his attendant angel what those horses and their riders mean. He promises to show him, but the statement is given by the personage lirst seen and standing in the foreground of the picture — the Great Uncreated Angel of Jehovah — " These are they whom the Lord sends to traverse the whole earth." Then they themselves come forward and make their report in the hearing of the prophet : " We have traversed the earth, and lo, all the nations are still and at rest." Even those great powers which had so cruelly oppressed the Jews were not receiving their deserved retribution. This is the main point of their report. Upon this, the revealing angel, warming in sympathy with the prophet and his people, cries — " How long, O Lord, ere thou wilt have mercy on Jerusalem and on Judah, upon which thou hast manifested thine indignation now seventy years ? " To this the Lord answers witli words of comfort and cheer. He has purposed to scourge and soon to destroy that fierce Chaldean power, and he will surely hft up Jerusalem. V. 15 may be paraphrased thus: "I am very sore displeased with Chaldea and Edom : I was comparatively a little displeased with my people, Judah and Jerusalem, and therefore I sufiered those powers to come down on the holy city and land ; but they aug- mented that infliction ; they gave vent to their cruel and vindictive spirit, and have quite overdone the work which I commissioned them to do. For this, they are to have a fearful doom." In V. 16, the Lord promises to return in mercy and to help onward the rebuilding of the city ; and in v. 17, that the population should overpass the city walls and fill the adjacent country. " Will yet choose Jerusalem " — means, will yet maiiifest his loving choice of her by appropriate mercies. 18. Then lifted I up mine eyes, and saw, and beliold four horns. 19. And I said unto the angel that talked with me. What 1)6 these % And he answered me, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, Israel, and Jerusalem. 20. And the Loed shewed me four carpenters. 21. Then said I, What come these to do ? And he spake, saying, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, so that no man did lift up his head: but these 300 ZECHAKIAH.— CHAP. II. are come to fray them, to cast out tlie horns of the Gen tiles, which lifted up iheiv horn over the land of Jndah to scatter it. This second vision is closely connected in significance with the first, looking especially to the destruction of those heathen powers which "had scattered Judah and Jerusalem." The "horn" is a natural emblem of power. The number, four, does not count so many tiostile nations, but rather means all, in every quarter of the earth, toward every cardinal point of the compass, who have been pushing and scattering the saints of God. The word rendered "carpenters," should be "smiths," workers in iron or other met- als, and therefore armed with suitable instruments for breaking horns. The word "fray," mostly obsolete as a verb, means to frighten. The next verb, rendered " cast out," has a stronger sense — ca%t down to the ground^ so as altogether to paralyze their power for harm. This prediction was fulfilled shortly after. Chaldea revolted against its late Medo-Persian conquerors during the reign of this same Darius. He consequently attacked and subdued them, and then greatly marred the military strength and glory of Baby- lon. Thenceforward Chaldea was no more felt or feared as a power among the nations. OHAPTEE II. This chapter introduces one vision and has but a single theme. The vision presents a man going forth to measure Jerusalem ; but ho is soon stopped, and it is announced that Jerusalem shall be so prosperous and populous that her people shall overpass her former limits and fill the adjacent country with unwalled villages (vs. 1-4). God will dwell in the midst of her, revealing his glory there ; her captive children are exhorted to flee out of Babylon and hasten home. In the greatness of her future prosperity, many other nations shall join themselves unto the Lord (vs. 5-13). 1. I lifted up mine eyes again, and looked, and behold a man vfith a measuring line in his hand. 2. Then said I, Whither goest thou ? And he said unto me, To measm^e Jerusalem, to see what is the breadth thereof, and what is the length thereof. 3. And behold, the angel that talked with me went forth, and another aijgel went out to meet him, 4. And said unto him. Run, speak to this young man, saying, Jerusalem shall be inhabited as towns without walls for the multitude of men and cattle therein : In this vision a man is seen with a measuring line, going forth ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. 11. 301 1o measure Jerusalem — probably its dimensions before its recent destruction — as if preparing to rebuild it on the same foundations. The angel that talked with the prophet went forth (/. e.^ from the prophet) and another angel came forth (it may be supposed) from the Lord, to meet him and to say to him : Hasten to that young man who has the measuring line, and tell him there is no occasion to measure the old limits of the city ; the new one shall spread out beyond her former walls, and her people shall live in the surrounding country without walls, because of the multitude of men and of cattle. In this passage, the point most in dispute among critics is the question — Who is this "young man "? (v. 4). Some say he is the prophet Zechariah ; others, that he is the " man with a measuring line " of v. 1 — an appropriate work for an active young man. I incline to the latter view, especially because v. 4 implies that the measurement of the city is arrested for reasons there given. The whole scene was designed to impress vividly upon the prophet and his people the great promise of God respect- ing the growth, prosperity, and glory of the new city, and ulti- mately of that spiritual Zion of which this was the outward symbol. 6. For I, saitli the Loed, will be unto her a wall of fire round about, and will be the glory in the midst of her. The connection of thought here is admirable : Think no more of walls to be rebuilt for the new city, nor of costly outlays to beautify and adorn it ; " for I, saith the Lord, will be myself her wall," even "a wall of fire round about her; " and I will be her adornment also — even " a glory in the midst of her." This mag- nificent promise we cannot suppose to have been exhausted in the days of Zechariah, nor in the entire period before the incarnation of the Son of God; but preeminently then when He, the great In- carnation of God, became manifest in human flesh in the midst of his Zion. Yet its fulfilment began in those days of Zion's reforma- tion and rebuilding. Our divine Lord reasserted essentially the same thing and made it a promise of perpetual love to his Church, when he said, " Lo, I am with you alway, even to the end of the world." 6. Ho, ho, come forth^ and flee from the land of the north, saith the Loed : for I have spread you abroad as the four winds of the heaven, saith the Loed. T. Deliver thyself, O Zion, that dwellest with the daughter of Babylon. This call summons all Jews still remaining in Chaldea to return, especially to escape from the judgments God was soon to bring on Babylon. Babylon is " the land of the north." (See Jer. 6 : 1-22, and 16 : 15.) This call to escape contemplates (probably) that 302 ZECIIARIAH.— CHAP. II. impending devastation of Babylon referred to in 11)6 notes on Zech. 1 : 21. The Lord had scattered them abroad as if the winds from every quarter of the licavens had been combined for this work. This is the most natm-al sense of the words "«s the four winds of heaven " — i. e., would do it. So, in Isa. 64 : 6, and Job 30 : 15. A different phrase is used to express the sense — into or toward the four quarters of the heavens ; as in Jer. 49 : 32-36. 8. For thus saith the Loed of hosts : After the glory hath he sent me unto the nations which spoiled you : for he that toucheth you toueheth the apple of his eye. Here two points may need each a word of explanation, viz., the sense of the phrase "after the glory," and the identification of the persons "he" and "me," in the clause "he hath sent me," &c. "After the glory" is an elliptical, shortened phrase, looking to v. 5, and meaning that after having become the glory of Zion by reveal- ing himself as her king, her refuge, and protector, it followed naturally that he should be sent to scourge the nations that had spoiled Jerusalem, i. e., the Chaldeiins, and perhaps the Edomites also. As to the persons "he" and "me," in the phrase "he hath sent me," &c., the languagif implies that the speaker who calls himself the "Lord of hosts," has been sent by some one referred to as "he; " "Ae hath sent wze," &c. The one thus "sent " can be no other than the leading personage in the vision (1 : 8-13), there seen on a red horse (v. 8) ; to whom the other horsemen report (v. 11) ; to whom the angel interpreter offers prayer (v. 12) ; and moreover the same personage who in 2 : 5 says, " I will be a glory in the midst of her," i. d, i. 6., among his people, in his temple at Jerusalem. As the chariots represent his providential agencies, going forth on their mission, so their head-quarters and starting-point should be the place of his abode. That they come forth from between two mountains is due simply to the necessities of chariot-driving in a mountainous country. They cannot run on the tops or sides of rugged mountains, but only in the valley, which will be between two mountains. 9. And tlie word of the Lokd came unto me, saying, 10. Take of them of the captivity, even of Heldai, of Tobijah, of Jedaiah, which are come from Babylon, and come thou the same day, and go into the house of Josiah the son of Zephaniah ; 11. Then take silver and gold, and make crowns, and set them upon the head of Joshua the son of Jose- decli, the high priest ; 12. And speak unto him, saying. Thus speaketh the Lord of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRAKCH ; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the Loud : 13. Even he shall build the temple of the Lokd ; and lie shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his ZECHAEIAH.— CHAP. VI. 319 throne : and he shall be a priest npon his throne : and the counsel of peace shall be between them both. 14. And the crowns shall be to Ilelem, and to Tobi- jah, and to Jedaiah, and to Hen the son of Zephaniah, for a memorial in the temple of the Loed. 15. And they that are far off shall come and bnild in the temple of the Lokd ; and ye shall know that the LoED of hosts hath sent me nnto you. And this shall come to pass, if ye will diligently obey the voice of the Lord your God. The series of visions is now closed, and we have here an actual transaction of a symbolical character. That this is not a vision, but As a real transaction, appears on the face of the record. It does not open with " I saw by night " (as 1:8); nor " I lifted up mine eyes and saw " (as 1 : 18) ; nor "I lifted up mine eyes again " (as 2:1); nor " he showed me" (as 3 : 1) ; nor as 4 : 1 and 4:5; nor as 6 : 1 — all which statements testify that the scenes that follow re- spectively were witnessed in prophetic vision. On the contrary, this is simply '' The word of the Lord came unto me,*' as in 1 : 1, and 7 : 1, and 8:1, &c., where verbal communications are made. More- over, here is not a presentation of things to be seen by the prophet, but a command respecting things to be done. And finally, these crowns, after being made and solemnly placed on the head of the liigh priest, were to be "laid up for a memorial in the temple of the Lord," all indicating an actuality, things done in real life. The leading points are tlie preparation of crowns ; the solemn cor- onation of the high priest ; the accompanying announcement and explanations, showing that the purport of the transaction was to make Joshua a special type of the Messiah, and to reveal vastly important truths respecting his person and relations to men ; and finally, to indicate that Gentile nations were to participate in the services and the glories of his coming kingdom. This seems to have been a double crown, the word for crown being plural, the verb (v. 14) being in the singular ; and manifestly but one head, that of Joshua, is crowned in the transaction. To obtain the sUver and the gold for its construction, the prophet is directed to go to certain men here named, who are recently from Babylon, captive Jews, who remained behind when the first company of their breth- ren left, and who seem to have come to Jerusalem now with a con- tribution from their brethren still behind, to aid in building the temple. Josiah, son of Zephaniah, may have been the treasurer of this fund ; hence the direction to go with the other three without delay to his house to draw the money. The original brings in the phrase, "who are come from Babylon," at the end of the verse, showing that Josiah, as well as the other three, was in the delega- tion from the captive Jews there. Having made the crowns, ho Bots them upon the head of Joshua the high priest, and then sol- 320 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. VI. emnly announces from the Lord, " Beliold the man — Branch is his name ; he shall branch " (shoot) " up from underneath himself " (from his own humble root), " and he shall build the temple of the Lord." As already indicated, the sense of the word rendered " Branch " is shoot, the single stock that springs from the root and becomes the one trunk of the tree. In the original the verb ren- dered "shall grow," is the same — shall shoot up. The specially emphatic declaration here is that this man — the Branch — " shall build the temple of the Lord.'''' Hence this is solemnly repeated (v. 13) : " Even he " (he alone, and he in distinction from all others) " shall build the temple of the Lord." This cannot refer to the temple then being built by Zerubbabel, for of this the Lord had explicitly declared (4 : 9), " The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundations of this house, and Ms hands shall also finish it.^^ "We must therefore look to another temple, which can be none other than that so often referred to in the New Testament, built by Jesus, the Messiah, of which it is said, " ye " (Christians) " are the temple of the living God" (2 Cor. C : 16). "For the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are''"' (1 Cor. 3 : 16, 17). " Ye also, as living stones, are built up a spiritual house," &c. (1 Peter 2 : 5). The comprehensive idea embraces the spiritual kingdom of the Messiah, of which the Jewish temple was an apposite symbol. In that an- cient temple Jehovah dwelt, revealing his presence. So in this, the presence of the Holy Ghost reclaims men's hearts to God, and makes them pure before him. Yet further : " He shall bear the glory," i. e., preeminent glory, becoming the " head of all things to his church," "King of kings " " moreover, and " Lord of lords." "He shall sit and rule upon his throne," truly a king, not in Zion alone, but over all the earth, or rather all the earth shall ultimately become his Zion, since his kingdom shall in the latter days embosom and absorb into itself all other kingdoms and all other love, obe- dience, and homage, so that it can be said truly, " The kingdoms of this world have become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ, and he (alone) shall reign for ever and ever." He shall also " be a priest upon his throne," uniting these two functions in his own person, and never ceasing to mediate for his people, and be their great atoning sacrifice because of his exaltation to so great power and glory on his throne. The phrase " the counsel of peace shall be between them both," does not refer to some second person other than the Messiah, cooperating with him ; nor do.es it mean merely that Messiah as king and Messiah as priest shall be harmonious and not conflicting, but rather that both as King and as Priest, Messiah shall consult for and shall secure the peace, the highest spiritual good of his people. The full energy of both rela- tions shall be made subservient to the spiritual life and consequent peace and blessedness of his children. After these crowns had served their temporary purpose in this typical inauguration of Joshua the high priest, they were to be laid up in the temple of the Lord, as a memorial for those four delegates who came up from ZECHAEIAH.— CHAP. VII. 321 afar with those offerings of silver and gold for the temple. They are now representative men, to indicate that people from afar, even the Gentile nations, " shall come and build in the temple of the Lord," i. e., shall come into the Christian Church, bringing into it their wealth, their personal service, and the full homage of their willing hearts. That they should come and build in the temple, is Jewish costume, like that of Isaiah (ch. 60), to show that in the lat- ter day, Gentile nations from all the ends of the earth shall swell the hosts of the people of God and contribute their wealth and their hearts to the greatness and glory of his kingdom on earth. As usual with Zechariah, the final seal is put upon this glorious prophecy : " Ye shall know by your own precious experience that the Lord hath sent me to you to say these things." They cannot fail. The names of those four representative men are given dif- ferently, yet too much should not be made of this. Heldai, the first one named (v. 10), becomes in v. 14 Helem, a word of nearly the same significance; while Josiah, son of Zephaniah (v. 16), bo- comes in V. 14 Hen, the son of Zephaniah, which is also of kindred meaning. There are no certain data upon which to account for these changes of names. These two men may have had each two names, or there may be a play upon their first name by giving another of similar significance ; or the intent of it may have been to call attention to the meaning of their names. The case is scarcely of sufiicient importance to Justify or call for much specu- lation. The last clause has the appearance of being broken off abruptly, leaving the corresponding part to be supplied. • " And it shall come to pass if ye will diligently obey the voice of the Lord your God " . . . . (supply) all these promised blessings shall come to you most abundantly. You shall have them on condition of obeying the Lord diligently, but on no other. So all the great blessings of the gospel are, as to each of us, suspended on this con- dition of honest diligence and faithful obedience to the Lord our God, Perhaps it was with the intention of making this condition the more impressive, that the sentence breaks off thus abruptly, leaving the reader to inquire the more carefully into the force of this great condition, and the wealth of blessings suspended upon it. CHAPTER VII. This chapter and the next were both occasioned by one special circumstance. For seventy years the people had been observing certain days of fasting, in remembrance of prominent events con- nected with the fall of their beloved city and temple. Now, they had returned from their captivity ; the city was rebuilt ; the work on the temple was far advanced toward completion. It was now the fourth year of Darius, and the temple was finished in his sixth year. The community was decidedly prosperous ; hence the ques- 14* 322 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP, VII. tion arose — Shall we continuo to observe those days of fasting Would it not be more appropriate to observe days of praise and thanksgiving? The Lord sends his answer by his prophet Zech- ariah. It is twofold. (1.) It rebukes the hypocrisy and selfish- ness manifested by some of the people in those very fasts which should have been seasons of special humiliation and honest confes- sion of sin before the Lord ; admonishes them that God's eye is on their moral conduct as well as on their hearts, and exhorts them to justice and righteousness, especially by the sad case of their ftithers, whom the Lord had scourged so severely by a long and terrible captivity. This part of the reply fills out the seventh chapter (vs. 4-14). (2.) The second part fills the eighth chapter, and is rich in promised blessings to the obedient, closing with a direct answer to their inquiry. 1. And it came to pass in the foiirtli year of king Darius, that the word of the Lord came unto Zechariah in the fourth day of the ninth month, even in Chisleu ; 2. "When they had sent unto the house of God, She- rezer and Regem-melech, and their men, to praj before the LoKD, 3. And to speak unto the priests which were in the house of the Lokd of hosts, and to the prophets, saying. Should I weep in the fifth month, separating myself, as I have done these so many years ? The date is given precisely, this being a matter of historic im- portance. From the arrival of the first caravan of returning Jews in the first year of Cyrus (n. c. 536) to the second year of "Darius (about B. 0. 520), the people had been harassed by their Samaritan enemies ; the work on the temple for a time dragged heavily, and was finally quite suspended. At length, under special messages from God by Ilaggai and Zechariah, it was resumed in the second year of Darius. VVith this resumption commenced an era of great prosperity. Their foreign enemies ceased to annoy them; the smiles of God rested on all their labors. After two years of such prosperity, the question naturally arose, whether they should con- tinue to observe certain days of fasting, as they had done then some seventy years. The most prominent of these days are specially re- ferred to here ; that in the fifth month (v. 3), and that also in the seventh month (v. 5). Chap. 8:19 refers to two others, viz., one in the fourth month and another in the tenth. The history indicates the special reason of fasting on these days. In the fifth month ther temple was burnt (Jer. 52 : 12). In the seventh, Gedahah was slain, and the small remnant that remained with him were scattered and destroyed (Jer. 41 : 1 fl'). In the fourth month the city was taken (Jer. 52 : 6, 7). In the tenth it was invested by the armed hosts of Nebuchadnezzar (Jer. 52 : 4). Y. 2 should be translated — " When ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. VIL 323 Bethel " (the household of God, in the sense of the congregation of the Lord) " sent Sherezer," &o., i. e., the people in the capacity of a worshipping congregation, sent this commission to their priests and prophets with this inquiry. Y. 3. " Separating myself," i. e., from my accustomed secular labors — making it a holy and solemn day. 4. Then came tlie word of the Lord of hosts unto me, saying, 5. Speak unto all the people of the land, and to the priests, saying. When ye fasted and mourned in the fifth and seventh montJi^ even those seventy years, did ye at all fast unto me, even to me ? 6. And when ye did eat, and when ye did drink, did not ye eat for yourselves^ and drink for yourselves f This rebuke manifestly applied to some of those who united in this inquiry. The Lord asks — Did your fasting have any regard to me ? Did you think of your sins against me f Did you humble your- selves before me ? So, when ye ate and when ye drank, was it not 1/e that ate, and ye that drank? This is the literal rendering, and implies that they thought of nothing but their own sensual gratifi- cation, ate and drank merely to enjoy themselves, and as if there were no God to thank, no great Giver to recognize as the fountain of all blessings. 7. Should ye not hear the words which the Loed hath cried by the former prophets when Jerusalem was in- habited and in prosperity, and the cities thereof round about Jier, when men inhabited the south and the plain ? The original omits the verb before " words " in the beginning of the verse, apparently assuming that the sense would be clear with- out it. In supplying it, the choice lies between our Enghsh text and the marginal reading, the former giving the sense most in har- mony with the strain of the passage. The verse suggests the substance of the next special message (vs. 8-14), the admonitions sent from God by the prophets to their fathers, their rejection of them, and the consequences. 8. And the word of the Lord came unto Zechariah, saying, 9. Thus speaketh the Lord of hosts, saying. Execute true judgment, and shew mercy and compassions every man to his brother : 10. And opx^ress not the widow, nor the fatherless, 324 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. VIII. the stranger, nor tlie poor ; and let none of yon imagine evil against his brother in yonr heart. 11. Bnt they refused to hearken, and pnlled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, that they should not hear. 12. Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the LoKD of hosts hath sent in his Spirit by the former prophets : therefore came a great wrath from the Lokd of hosts. 13. Therefore it is come to pass, that as he cried, and they would not hear ; so they cried, and I would not hear, saith the Lord of hosts : 14. But I scattered them with a whirlwind among all the nations whom they knew not. Thus the land was desolate after them, that no man passed through nor returned : for they laid the pleasant land desolate. Here the Lord gives to his servant Zechariah a summary of the message he sent by many of his prophets shortly before the cap- tivity. Y. 9 should therefore read — " Thus the Lord did speak," i. c, to your fathers, by Jeremiah and Zephaniah in the days of Jo- siah ; and somewhat earlier by Hosea, Amos, Isaiah, and Micah. In V. 11, "pulled away the shoulder," is in Hebrew, "They gave a refractory shoulder," i. ^., they made their shoulder refrac- tory — with allusion to the bullock who refuses to be broken into patient labor. V. 12 most fuUy recognizes the inspiration of the prophets. The Lord sent His words to the people ty his Spirit, by the hand, i. e., the ministration of the former prophets. By his Spirit, rather than "*w," is the sense of the original, the preposition being the same as that before the " hand of the prophets." V. 13, " Hence it is come to pass " — referring still to the history of what occurred shortly before the captivity. V. 14 fully confirms this general course of interpretation, as referring to the ways of God toward the people, and of the people towai'd God, in the age next preceding the time of Zechariah. That history was exceed- ingly full of most pertinent and valuable instruction. CHAPTER VIII. As already remarked in the introduction to chap. 7, this con- tinues and concludes the subject opened in that chapter. It gives the brighter side — the message of the Lord to the truly humbled, penitent, and believing portion of the people. Hence it abounds in cheering promises. ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. VIII. 325 1. Again tlie word of the Loed of hosts came to me, saying, 2. Thus saith the Loed of hosts ; I was jealous for Zion with great jealousy, and I was jealous for her with great fury. " Jealous for Zion." The same sentiment is even yet more ex- panded (cliap. 1 : 14-16). This revived jealousy for Zion implies that the Lord's love for her was enkindled afresh ; his pity, too, be- came active; his apprehensions also for the honor of his name before the nations ; and not least, his indignation toward the people tliat had so cruelly oppressed Zion. All these feelings conspired toward his purpose to return in mercy to Zion, as the next verse states. 3. Thus saith the Loed ; I am returned unto Zion, and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem : and Jerusa- lem shall be called, a city of truth ; and the mountain of the Loed of hosts, the holy mountain. These are the blessings. It is noticeable that moral purity stands specially prominent. " Jerusalem shall be called " (because she shall really de) "the city of truth," distinguished above all other cities for substantial integrity of character ; and the temple- mountain where the Lord dwells shall be " the holy mountain " — holy, by reason of the regeneration and sanctification of those who worship the Lord there. Such should be the results of the Lord's returning to Zion, to dweU there by his spiritual presence. These are the legitimate criteria of his real presence by his Spirit any- where. 4. Thus saith the Loed of hosts ; There shall yet old men and old women dwell in tl^e streets of Jerusalem, and every man with his staff in his hand for very age. 5. And the streets of the city shall be full of boys and girls playing in the streets thereof. A beautiful scene of peace and prosperity, indicated by the groups of the aged, still living as witnesses to the long-continued exemption from desolating wars, and the yet more numerous throng of little boys and girls playing and happy in the streets. Evermore, through all the ages before Christ, such external prosperity is ac- counted as evidence of God's favor and approval. " Length of d^ys is in her right hand; in her left, riches and honor." The ge- nius of God's providential government in that age involved a high degree of present retribution. 6. Thus saith the Loed of hosts ; If it be marvellous in the eyes of the remnant of this people in these days, 326 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. VHI. sliould it also be marvellous in mine eyes? saitli tlia LoED of hosts. Though it should seem marvellous and almost incredible in your eyes, that I should bestow so great blessings, yet must it be marvel- lous in mine ? Is any thing too hard for the Lord ? Is any measure of blessings so great as to be marvellous in view of the great depths of divine love ? 7. Thus saith the Loed of hosts ; Behold, I will save my people from the east country, and from the west country ; 8. And I will bring them, and they shall dwell in the midst of Jerusalem : and they shall be my people, and I will be their God, in truth and in righteousness. This is a promise to save his people wherever they were, and to gather them in from their dispersions — two quarters of tlie heavens, the land toward the sun-rising and the land toward the sun-setting being named — a part for the whole. Its fulfilment in the literal sense took place while yet that economy continued, which required the residence of the Jews in their own land. 9. Thus saith the Lokd of hosts ; Let your hands be strong, ye that hear in these days these words by the mouth of the prophets, which were in the day that the foundation of the house of the Lokd of hosts was laid, that the temple might be built. 10. For before these days there was no hire for man, nor any hire for beast ; neither was there amy peace to him that went out or came in because of the affliction : for I set all men every one against his neighbor. 11. But now I will not he unto the residue of this people as in the former days, saith the Loed of hosts. 12. For the seed shall he prosperous ; the vine shall give her fruit, and the ground shall give her increase, and the heavens shall give their dew ; and I will cause the remnant of this people to possess all these things. These words exhort the people to courage, fearlessness, and vigor, in the prosecution of the temple-building, and in whatever labor the Lord might impose. "While the temple lay neglected all things went awry; enemies pressed them from abroad; dissension, stagnation, and starvation distressed them at home. "When the Lord says, "I set all men each one against his neighbor," he refers to what he let men do, in the sense of not preventing it — as a judg- ment on them for their sins. ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. VIII. 327 13. And it sliall come to pass, that as ye were a curse among tlie heathen, O house of Judah and house of Israel ; so will I save you, and ye shall be a blessing : fear not, hut let your hands be strong. The expression, "ye were a curse among the heathen," &c., might in itself mean either that they Irouglit curses upon the heathen, or that they were themselves cursed amo7ig the heathen. The latter I take to he the sense here.— ^ — So of blessings : the sense is, ye shall he blessed. 14. For thus saith the Loed of hosts ; As I thought to punish you, when your fathers provoked me to TVTath, saith the Loud of hosts, and I repented not : 15. So again have I thought in these days to do well unto Jerusalem and to the house of Judah : fear ye not. The antithesis here is this : As I thought to punish your fathers for their great provocations, and did not swerve from my thought, but carried it intor execution ; so have I now thought to bless Jeru- salem, and I shall not fail to do it ! Fear not ! 16. These are the things that ye shall do ; Speak ye every man the truth to his neighbor ; execute the judg- ment of truth and peace in your gates : lY. And let none of you imagine evil in your hearts against his neighbor; and love no false oath: for all these are things that I hate, saith the Lokd. The usual and always pertinent exhortations to practise riglit- eousness and truth. The last clause of v. IG enjoins upon them to administer law in the courts according to justice and truth. This would promote real peace and prosperity. Such decisions are de- cisions of peace. 18. And the word of the Loed of hosts came unto me, saying, 19. Thus saith the Loed of hosts ; The fast of the fourlii month^ and the fast of the fifth, and the fast of the seventh, and the fast of the tenth, shall be to the house of Judah joy and gladness, and cheerful feasts ; therefore love the truth and peace. Here we find the explicit answer to the question sent up from the people by the hand of Sherezer and Ecgem-melech, Those fasts shall be changed to seasons of joy and gladness, and to cheer- ful feasts — only the Lord still enforces- that which is evermore es- sential to their abiding prosperity — "Zo«c tlie trutli and 'peace.'''' 328 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. VIII. 20. Thus saith the Lord of hosts : It shall yet come to pass, that there shall come people, and the inhabitants of many cities: 21. And the inhabitants of one city shall go to an- other, saying, Let ns go speedily to pray before the Loed, and to seek the Loed of hosts : I will go also. 22. Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek the Lord of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray be- fore the Lord. 23. Thus saith the Lord of hosts ; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you : for we have heard that God is with you. The renewed vitality of the religious life in these times of Zech- ariah, suggested the yet far more glorious re\dval and consequent extension of pure religion in the latter days. The transition from the gloom and grief of the captivity to the peace and joy indicated thus far throughout this chapter, becomes suggestive and significant of another adv^ance — perhaps I might say a similar transition from the narrow limitations of the kingdom of God then, to that won- drous expansion when "many people and strong nations shall come to seek the Lord of hosts in Jerusalem and to pray before the Lord." Such seems to be the mental law of association under which these predictions of the Messiah's enlarged and glorious king- dom are brought to mind. 1 can find no adequate fulfilment of these promises short of the millennial days. Nothing at all equiva- lent has yet transpired. Let us look a moment at their significance. In V. 21, " Let us go speedily," is the usual intensive repetition of the infinitive with the finite verb, and might as well be rendered "Let us go with all our heart" — earnestly. This would imply going speedily ; but it would also mean much more than that. The last clause also is strong: " I, too, wOl surely go; " or "Let me go too." " Ten men " is a definite number for an indefinite, as many as could well get hold of one man's skirt — and obviously means that many men shall follow one Jew as their guide ; as many as one man can teach. This throng of pupils represents far mom than a single nation. Indeed, each of the ten representative men stands for one nation, since they are each of different language, and taken together represent " all languages of the nations " — indicating that people of every tongue and clime shall come to Ziou for the law and the light of God. That they are said to come to Jerusalem is due to the necessary modes of Jewish thought. That was the only way in which the Jews before Christ could conceive of real con- versions — the only language descriptive of conversion which they could understand. They had not yet reached the idea that God can- ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. IX. 329 be worsliipped acceptably and spiritually, just as well anywhere else as in Jerusalem. Hence those glorious conversions of Gentile nations, which are to take place far down in the ages of the gospel dispensation, if foretold at all by Jewish prophets and for Jewish readers, must be presented in thoroughly Jewish language and in harmony with Jewish conceptions. So we ought to expect to find it throughout the Old Testament prophets ; so we do find it. On this principle, the " Jcav " is any one with whom God is. Under the gospel system "he is not a Jew who is one outwardly'''^ (Rom. 2 : 28, 29). This passage, therefore, is a prediction that "the inhabitants of many cities" — "yea, many people and strong nations" — yea, na- tions so diverse that they speak all the languages of the earth — shall come to those who have the gospel and beg to be led to the Lamb of God. They shall come with great earnestness and zeal, manifesting the utmost readiness to go themselves, and exhorting others likewise — the people of one city pressing the people of an- other city to join the great company of those who shall go to pray before the Lord and to seek the Lord of hosts. Such is the im- port of this wonderful prophecy. We can scarcely wish it were greater and better in the breadth and richness of its promises. Who can find it in his heart to wish it were less ? CHAPTER IX. Vs. 1-8 sketch the sweep of the conquering hosts of Alexan- der the Great in western Asia, and along the eastern coast of the Mediterranean, and refer to the special protection afforded by the Lord to his people in the midst of that scene of danger ; then the prophet (vs. 9, 10) passes over to the greater protection and salva- tion wrought out by King Messiah for his people ; and then (vs. 10- 17) on the same analogy predicts the protection of the Jews against the Greco-Syrian power in the age of the Maccabees. 1. The burden of tlie word of the Lokd in the land of Hadrach, and Damascus shall he the re'st thereof: when the eyes of man, as of all the tribes of Israel, shall 1)6 toward the Lord. "Burden," as usual, is a prediction of calamity, here destined to fall, not on God's people, but on their enemies. "Hadrach" has given critics ample occasion for research, ingenuity, and diver- sity of opinion. It would seem, from the connection, to be a coun- try; yet geographically this name for a country is unknoAvn. The vague reports of some obscure city bearing this name, are, in the first place, very unreliable at the best ; and then the position which this name occupies in the first eight verses among Damascus, Tyre, Zidon, &c., and at the head of them all, quite forbids that it should be an insignifixjant, almost unknown city. The best solution yet 330 ZECHARIAH.~CnAP. IX. suggested is tliat of Hengstenberg, v/lio thinks it is purposely enig. matical, and refers to Persia ; and that etymologically, it is made up from two Hebrew verbs,* the former meaning to he strong, and the latter to he wea^, giving the significance — Tlie strong-weah; — thus intimating that she is at one time strong ; at another, weak ; — strong under a Cyrus ; weak under her last Darius. The reason for an enigmatical name lay in the delicate relations which the Jews of his time sustained to the Persian throne. The Books of Ezra and N"ehemiah make the delicacy of those relations very palpable. See especially Ezra, chap. 4-6. It could not be wise for a Hebrew prophet to utter such predictions against Persia as might be caught up and construed into proof of unfriendliness toward that power. Enigmatical names are not entirely without precedent among the Hebrew prophets. Jeremiah has Sheshach for Babylon (25 : 26 and 51 : 41). It is remarkable that though Hadrach (Persia) is named as the first to feel the sweep of this conquering devastator, Alexander, and thongh precisely this is the order of the historic facts, yet the prophet passes her with only her enigmatical name. A burden of the word of the Lord is upon her land; that is all he thinks proper to say. Damascus is the place upon which this bur- den rests down. The predicted ruin should smite and crush her. To the last clause, interpreters have given two difierent con- structions : one thus — " Because the Lord's eye is upon men, even upon all the tribes of Israel ; " the other thus : " Because the eyes of men, even of aU the tribes of Israel, are toward and unto the Lord." The latter is much better sustained by the grammatical relations of the words, and has also this in its favor, that it practi- cally involves the former. When the eyes of men, even of all God's people, are toward him for help, then his eye is surely upon them in love, care, and succor. It was in answer to the humble uplifted eye and prayer of God's people that this conquering sweep of Alex- ander crushed down so many of those ancient powers hostile to the covenant people, but spared them. 2. And Hamath also shall border thereby; Tjrus and Zidon, thongh it be very wise. Hamath, a country lying north of Palestine, bordered on Damas- cus, and therefore fell within the range of this great conqueror, and came down beneath the force of his arms. So did Tyre, with Zidon, because she had taken great pride in her wisdom, and had so utter- ly renounced all reliance on the true God. In this passage Tyre leads the thought, as also in the historic fiicts she had quite eclipsed Zidon. Hence, the verb rendered ''be very wise," is in the singu- lar, and refers primarily to Tyre. The word rendered " though " should be read "because," this being its usual and best established meaning. The full thought is brought out by Ezekiel in 28 : 2, 3, 6, 17: " Say to the prince of Tyrus, Thus saith the Lord God, Be- ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. IX. 331 cause tliine licart is lifted up and thou hast said — I am God ; I sit in the seat of God, in the midst of the seas; yet thou art a man and not God, though thou set thy heart as the heart of God ; therefore, because thou hast set thy heart as the heart of God, behold therefore I will bring strangers upon thee, the terrible of the nations, &c., &c. 3. And Tyrus did build lierself a strong hold, and heaped up silver as the dust, and fine gold as the mire of the streets. . 4. Behold, the Lord will cast her out, and he will smite her power in the sea ; and she shall be devoured with fire. Further and special notice is taken of Tyre. After having been once fearfully desolated by JSTebuchadnezzar, she had fortified her- self on an island with immense strength, and, by means of her ex- tensive commerce, had amassed great wealth. But the Lord would dispossess her of all this wealth. So the original signifies, and not merely " cast her out." He would also smite her bulwarks, built up and standing in the sea, and she should be at length devoured utterly by fire. After a siege of seven months, Alexander took the city, u. c. 332, and every feature of this prophecy was fulfilled. 5. Ashkelon shall see it, and fear ; Gaza also shall see it, and be very sorrowful, and Ekron ; for her expec- tation shall be ashamed ; and the king shall perish from Graza, and Ashkelon shall not be inhabited. From Phoenicia the conqueror swept on to Philistia. The prophet's course of thought is the same. The fall of Tyre sent a panic through those cities of far inferior strength. How could they stand before a power with which Tyre, in all her glory and prowess, could not cope? See the same thoughts in Isa. 23. Tyre held Alexander's army at bay seven months ; the cities of Philistia scarcely retarded the conquering march of his army at all. The verse may be read thus : "Ashkelon shall see and be afraid ; Gaza, too, and she shall be in great anguish ; and Ekron, because she shall be ashamed of her trust (i. e., in Tyre) ; kings perish from Gaza, and Ashkelon shall no longer fill her throne " — literally, " shall not sit on a throne." Both shall cease to be nationalities ruled by kings. 6. And a bastard shall dwell in Ashdod, and I will cut off the pride of the Philistines. 7. And I will take away his blood out of his mouth, and his abominations from between his teeth ; but he that remaineth, even he shcdl de for our God, and he shall be as a governor in Judah, and Ekron as a Jebu- eite. 332 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. IX. The first clause I prefer to read — " A foreigner shall rule in Ashdod." The sense, however, may be only that foreigners shall dwell there. The verbs will bear either interpretation. Probably the meaning is, that the civil power has passed forever from the hands of the original Philistines to foreigners. Of course, the popu- lation would be in good part changed as Avell. The pride of Philistia would be eftectually humbled. And furthermore, the Lord would thoroughly cure them of their idolatry. The prophet, in representing this fact, thinks of them as eating things offered to idols, or as feasting in honor of their idols, and then the Lord plucks out the flesh from between their teeth and cleanses out the blood from their mouth. Then the remnant are converted — "shall be for our God " — are honored as a captain of a thousand in Judah ; and they of Ekron shall come to be as near to God as the Jebusites — the primitive inhabitants of Jerusalem — after that city became the holy and the chosen one of God. (See, Josh. 15 : 63, and Judg. 19 : 10, 11, and 2 Sam. 24 : 10.) This prophecy had its special fulfil- ment when the gospel was preached with great success by the apostles in those cities. It has its general fulfilment under the broad doctrine that all the great revolutions which the Lord brings about by war shall culminate at last in the wider range and sweep of his converting grace. Hence so many prophecies terminate like this. (See Isa. 19 : 18-25 and 23 : 15-18, and Jer. 12 : 15, 16.) 8. And I will encamp about mine house because of the army, because of him that passeth by, and because of him that retm-neth: and no oppressor shall pass through them any more : for now have I seen with mine eyes. The strain of the chapter thus far is that the Lord will let the great conqueror, Alexander, overwhelm the nations that had so often oppressed Israel. Here, on the other hand, he protects his own chosen people : "I will encamp about them and myself be a wall of fire around them for their sure defence." The special reason now thought of is the danger from the army of Alexander, " going and returning," moving to and fro, to Egypt and back, through or very near Judea. " No oppressor," in the precise sense of exactor of service or tribute, " shall pass over them any more," because hence- forth the eye of God's love and care is upon them, in the same sense, a watchful eye, as in Zech. 3 : 9 and 4 : 10. The fulfil- ment of this promise began with the nearer future, and was specially developed in the time of Alexander, when it was indeed striking and almost miraculous. If we may credit Josephus, Alexander sent to the Jews his usual demand for tribute as a token of submission, and was answered that they were in allegiance to the Persian throne. Offended by this reply, he soon after came in person ; met Jaddua, the high priest, in his robes of oflBce, attended by other priests ; was solemnly impressed by their appearance ; treated them with extra- ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. IX. 333 ordinary deference, and ever after accounted the Jews liis special friends. In explanation of this extraordinary conduct, he referred* to a dream in which a personage attired like this high priest, met liim while yet at home and pondering the question of invading Persia, encouraged him to go forward, assuring him of -victory and success. Consequently, he recognized this high priest as the minis- ter of the invisible gods, and all the more so when the Jews showed him the prophecies of Daniel respecting himself. Of the general fact of Alexander's special favor to the Jews, there can be no doubt. This favor fulfilled the prophecy before us (v. 8). God's hand was in the agencies that secured it. "Whether those agencies are given with general accuracy by Josephus, has been questioned ; but for aught that appears, with more reason for affirming than for denying. In its general significance, this promise is good for the true church of God in every age of time. 9. Kejoice greatly, O dangliter of Zion ; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem ; behold, thy King cometh unto thee : he is just, and haying salvation ; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass. This striking case of protection against one of the world's greatest and most formidable conquerors — protection which spe- cially shielded Jerusalem when all the adjacent cities and kingdoms were overrun and fearfully desolated — suggested the greater and more glorious protection achieved for the people of God through their incarnate Messiah, at once their great High Priest and their supreme King. Over this Deliverer, let Zion rejoice exceedingly! This summons to exultant joy indicates that Messianic blessings are before the prophet's eye. His character as King is specially prom- inent here because suggested by the protection he gives his people against their enemies. " Behold," see ! " Thy King shall come to thee," for thy help and refuge. "He is just," the first quality of a good king; and "iss«i;6^," **. e., protected of God. This word, rendered "having salvation,"* is the passive participle of the common verb, to save, from which our word Jesus is derived. It must, therefore, legiti- mately be taken in the sense — protected, carried safely through all danger — in this case, with reference to the sustaining hand of the Father, upholding his beloved Son through all the temptations and conflicts incident to his incarnation, sufferings, and death. More- over, he is an afflicted one, sorely bruised and suffering, for this is the usual sense of the word rendered "lowly." The last clause of the verse demands special attention : — " Kiding upon an ass, and upon a colt, the foal of an ass." The primary sense of these words is plain enough. It is also clear that the first and proper meaning of the words is precisely what they seem to say, viz., that 334 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. IX. lie should ride upon an ass, and even upon one yet younjo^. The ftict that the Lord Jesus fulfilled this prediction to the very letter; that he seemed to take special pains to fulfil it ; and more than all, that this riding was not for the common piu'pose of a more comfortable conveyance from place to place, but was in manner and form the solemn and joyous i)rocession of his inauguration and coronation as King in his own Jerusalem ; — coupled also with the fact that each one of the four evangelists has given with more or less ful- ness his own account of the transaction * — all combine to show that it must have had some ulterior and extraordinary significance. It cannot by any means be supposed that the transaction has no speciality of meaning. "What, then, is this special meaning — the significance of both the prophecy and the fulfilling act? Very much has been said to show that the ass is everywhere despised, and that riding on an ass indicates whatever is low and scarcely above contempt. That the Lord Jesus rode on an ass has been sup- posed to denote the position he held among the men of his genera- tion, as one " despised and rejected." This idea has been fostered by the fact that in some Christian countries Jews have been for- bidden to ride on horses, or on any otlier animal but the ass, for the purjiose of branding them with national odium. It is well understood among critics that Jewish commentators since the OJn-istian era have been sorely perplexed with this prediction of their Messiah in whom they have expected a conquering hero, and therefore could find no place in their preconceived notions of his character for such a feature and foct as this, especially inasmuch as modern ideas have led them to interpret the fact as a thing of dishonor. To relieve their King Messiah from this odium, they have taxed their ingenuity upon tradition and fable, e. g.^ asserting that this ass was .the identical one created within the six days of Gen. 1, the original ass(!), and the same on which Abraham rode to Mount Moriah to offer his Isaac there, and which Moses rode when ho came from Midian into Egy|:)t as their deliverer — thus asserting for him at least the honors of a renowned antiquity ! But these Jewish commentators, and some not Jewish, have made themselves gratuitous labor in explaining away the supposed disgrace of riding on an ass. It were better first to consider that the notions of modern Europe and America concerning the ass are no rule for the people of "Western Asia ; and further, that the no- tions of Arab tribes and Mohammedans who glory in the horse are not to be the standard by which to determine Hebrew ideas. Mani- festly the sole question here is, not what "Western nations think of the ass, nor what Arabs think of him, nor indeed what is thought of him by any people in any age or country who are accustomed to use his rival, tiie horse; but what were the current usages and hence the current ideas of the Jeics^ the people among whom Zech- * The reader will find the history of the fulfilment in Matt. 21 : 1-16, Mark 11 : 1-11, Luke 19 : 29-40, and John 12 : 12-18. ZECHARIAH.—CHAP. IX. 335 ariali lived and wrote ? That this is the very point to be ascertained seems too plain to need proof, and yet it has been strangely over- looked. It cannot be deemed necessary to prove that Jewish ideas were substantially the same from Abraham to the Christian era — certainly among all who, like Zechariah, held in high esteem the patriarchs of the nation and their ancient Scriptures. Let it then be considered that during the entire life of the Jewish nation, the horse had never any footing in Palestine, and therefore had no opportunity to disparage his lowlier rival. It was the divine policy to keep him out, as being uncongenial to the Hebrew state, too aristocratic, and withal dangerous as a temptation into the ways of the idolatrous and corrupt nations in their vicinity; and more than all, too much associated loithicar. These considerations all conspired to retain the ass in service and to secure for him a fairly respectable standing. But let us look at the historic foots. Abraham, the honored father of the nation, rode an ass. The sons of Jacob, heads of the tribes of Israel, rode every man his ass. Balaam, a great man in his country, rode on an ass. The daughter of Caleb, and Abigail too, among the worthy women of Jewish history, rode each on her ass. All the sons of David rode on mules — an animal of \\\Qi same general character ; Absalom also, when at the head of his army. In the transfer of the kingdom from David to Solo- mon, great account is made of his riding on David's mule in the royal procession on coronation day. It is therefore simply im- possible that any odium could have been attached to riding on an ass at the time Zechariah wrote, or at the time when Christ ful- filled his prediction. But there is one idea, already hinted at though not fully developed, which deserves a far more prominent position than it has had. The ass teas not adapted to loar; the horse was. For the most part the ass appears in Jewish history either used by men in peaceful life, or by women who should never be in any other. On the contrary, the horse of scripture history is a war-horse, with either his dragoon or his chariot. The Egyptians on one side ; the Assyrians, Chaldeans, and Persians on the other ; made great account of horses for war. Hence, when the horse in Jewish history sets foot on Palestine, he is there for war, for aggression. ISTor let us fail to notice in. our context that while King Messiah is to ride on an ass, the Lord says : "I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem; '' and he shall speak peace to the heathen." Jerusalem especially, the holy city where Jehovah dwelt, must have no horses. Their very names and their presence are too much associated icith tear. Zech. 12 :4 shows how tlie horse is commonly thought of as related to the Hebrew state. In the millennial age, horses for once (for the first time?) shall be really consecrated to God (14: 20), a most re- markable fact, and indicating a stupendous change ! The ass then is here an emblem of peace — of peaceful pursuits, of a peaceful king, and of his peaceful reign, ehowing that Messiah's kingdom should not be of this world, and should not make its conquests 336 ZECHAEIAH.— CHAP. IX. witli carnal weapons. This significant act, riding on an ass, is a symbol of Christ's peaceful reign, inaugurating him for the sort of work which the next verse describes. 10. And I will cut oif tlie "cliariot from Epliraim, and tlie liorse from Jerusalem, and the battle-bow sliall be cut off : and lie sliall speak peace unto the heathen : and his dominion shall he from sea emri to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth. This verse is closely connected with verse 9 — a part of the same grand prophecy of the Messiah and of his reign on earth — set here in a fine antithesis with the conquering, world-wide kingdom of Alexander. The chariot and the horse must be discarded and abolished as war-institutions^ and therefore wholly out of place un- der this peaceful reign. They can bear no part in the great con- quests which Zion's King is to make. He has no fighting to do with carnal weapons. On the contrary, he " speaTcs " peace to the nations. The gospel of his word carries with it peace and love to the very hearts of men. -The reader wiU notice how fully this view of Messiah's reign harmonizes with that given by Micah 4 : 1- 4; Isa. 11 and Ps. 72, &c., &c. Though the kingdom of Mes- siah relies on peaceful agencies alone for its diffusion, yet it shall be extended far away to the ends of the world. " His dominion shall be from sea to sea " — from land's end in one direction to land's end in another — " from the great river" (Euphrates) " to the ends of the earth." The prophet is not aiming to fix certain geographical boundaries to this kingdom, as if implying that it lies within these and in no case beyond them, but rather means that it is coexten- sive with the known world, sweeping away to the very ends of the earth. That this passage (vs. 9, 10) is a prophecy of Jesus Christ, admits of no rational doubt. (1.) The course of thought which suggests and introduces it, the transition from the protection af- forded against Alexander to the greater and better protection af- forded by Zion's King against Satan, the world's worst conqueror and tyrant, goes far to prove it Messianic. (2.) The call for ex- traordinary joy in this glorious King belongs to the prophecies of the Messiah, and to nothing of less magnitude and value. (3.) The points made can apply to none but the Messiah. (4.) They all apply to him easily, accurately, and fully. (5.) The one most extraordinary point — his riding on an ass — was not only fulfilled in him but ly him, with more appearance of special aim to fulfil this prophecy than is apparent elsewhere in regard to any other. Yet, in view of the exposition above given of the significance of this act, we must suppose that he did it because of its significance rather than merely for the sake of lYilfiUing this prophecy. He did fulfil it, however, none the less. (6.) The testimony of the disciples in their comments on the historic fact is in point. Matthew (21 : 4) remarks : " All this was done that it might be fulfilled which was ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. IX. 33Y spoken by the prophet," and then cites this passage ; while John (12 : 16) remarks that his " disciples did not understand these things at the first, hut when Jesus was glorified, then they remembered that these things were written of him, and that they had done these things unto him." When the Spirit had fully come to teach them all things, and to bring all things Christ had said and done to their remembrance, then the significance of this transaction be- came wonderfully clear to their minds. All these points of evi- dence combined make the proof signally complete — indeed, over- whelming. 11. As for thee also, by tlie blood of thy covenant 1 have sent forth thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water. 12. Turn you to the strong hold, ye prisoners of hope ; even to-day do I declare that I will render double unto thee ; 13. When I have bent Judah for me, filled the bow with Ephraim, and raised up thy sons, O Zion, against thy sons, O Greece, and made thee as the sword of a mighty man. The ninth and tenth verses may be regarded as a digression from the regular course of thought, and embraced in a parenthesis. In V. 11 the prophet returns to speak of events that follow shortly after those predicted (vs. 1-8). The conflict (v. 13) between the sons of Zion and the sons of Greece finds its fulfilment in the fu- rious wars waged during twenty-four years between the Jews and the Syrian Greeks, commencing in the reign of Antiochus Epiph- anes. His people are here called Greeks because his kingdom was one of the four into which the great Grecian empire of Alex- ander was divided, and also because their language and customs were Grecian. " As for thee also (O daughter of Zion, as in v. 9), because thou art in a covenant . with thy God w^hich is sealed with blood, I will send forth thy prisoners out of the pit in which is no water." The covenant of the Lord with the Jewish nation was sealed with sprinkled blood. See Ex. 24 : 8. — " And Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people, and said : Behold the blood of the covenant which the Lord had made with you concern- ing all these words." A " pit without water " is one from which the water has by somq means gone, leaving mud on the bottom, exceedingly oflfensive and often miasmatic. See the experiences of Joseph and of Jeremiah, Gen. 8T : 24 and Jer. 38 ; 6. The Lord's people are thought of as having been imprisoned in such a pit ; but the Lord sends them forth. The past tense, rendered " have sent," is doubtless used because the event is so fixed in the counsels of God as to be accounted done. Hence this tense (the perfect) is used by the prophets even for events yet as to actual occurrence in 15 338 ZECHAEIAH.— CHAP. IX. the future. This was to occur after Zechariah's day. " Eetm'n ye to the strong hold " — a high and therefore strong, inaccessible position, and here in contrast with the " deep pit " where they had lain imprisoned. Being the peojjle of Jehovah and in covenant with him, they were evermore "prisoners of hope" — prisoners having just ground of hope in his protecting, delivering grace. To " render double " is to give them blessings twice as great as their aflHictions had been. See the same expression, Isa. 40 : 2 and 61 : 7. It is altogether the way of the Lord to send grief and affliction only in single measure, but joy and blessing in double — weighing out the retributions of justice carefully and the inflictions of his rod very tenderly ; but pouring forth the bounties of his mercy as if he could not think of measuring them by any rule less than the impulses of infinite love ! In v. 13 — "'Because I have trodden Judah for my bow, and filled my bow with Ephraim as mine arrow " — means that the Lord is to use the military strength of Judah and Ephraim in protecting his land against the Syrian armies. The strong bows of the warrior were bent by nsing the foot as well as the hand. Hence the phrase "to tread the bow," for bending it to fit its string for use. Applying the arrow "filled the bow" — this being a necessary complement, without which it was of no account. "Raised up" should rather bo " roused up " — exciting and inspiring to deeds of heroic valor — all which had its precise fulfilment in those inspirations of heroism with which the Lord anointed the souls of the Maccabees against their Syrian foes. 14. And the Lokd sliall be seen over them, and his arrow shall go forth as the lightning : and the Lord God sliall blow the trumpet, and shall go with whirlwinds of the south. The agencies of God's providence in this war shall be as pal- pable as if Jehovah himself Avere visible above them as they fought their battles. Ilis own arrows shall go forth like the lightnings ; he shall blow the trumpet-blasts of the battle, and shall march upon his foes as in the whirlwinds of the south — those most fear- ful tornadoes that carry death in their wings. These whirwinds of the south are referred to by Job (37 : 9), and by Isaiah (21 : 1). This grouping of the boldest and most terrible elements of nature represents God's agencies in those wars. 15. Ihe LoED of hosts shall defend them ; and they sliall devour and subdue with sling-stones ; and they shall di-ink, and make a noise as through wine ; and they shall be filled like bowls, and as the corners of the altar. " The Lord of hosts " (" God of the celestial armies " is the right ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. IX. 339 name to use here) "shall defend them" (literally, shall throw his shield over them), "and they shall devour" (literally "eat" as it were the flesh of their enemies), "and shall tread down sling- stones " — implying that their enemies are now as powerless as a small sling-stone when lying on the ground, wliich is dangerous only when hurled and flying from its sling. The sense is not — "subdue with sling-stones," i. e.^ of their own; hut tread under foot their enemy as they would tread upon sling-stones. " They siiall drink," i. e., the blood of their enemies, as men drink wine, and shall shout as men under its stimulus, and be filled with it as the bowls of the altar, and as its corners upon which the blood was daily sprinkled. These allusions to the bowls and the corners of the altar may refer tacitly to the covenant sealed with blood, under which help came from God for victory. The reader will be careful to notice the contrast between these verses (13-15) and the Messianic passage (vs. 9, 10) on the point of war with deadly weapons. Under Messiah's peaceful reign there shall be no chariots or horses of war ; the battle-bow shall be cut off and unknown : but here, in the age before Messiah came, Ju- dah is the Lord's bow, Ephraim his arrow ; the Lord fights at their head, and they too fight with determined and almost furious bra- very. The Lord had his own reasons for making the age before Messiah came so militant. Let us not question their wisdom or their love. But manifestly it is his purpose in this chapter to put the future kingdom of the Messiah in the strongest possible con- trast with those mihtant features of the earlier age, and to assure us that in the good time coming men shall truly "learn war no more." The gospel, having once developed its whole genius and power, shall prove itself thoroughly and only " peace on earth and good will to men." 16. And the Lord their God shall save them in that day as the flock of his people : for they shall he as the stones of a crown, lifted up as an ensign upon his land. " The Lord their God shall save them as the flock of his people " — as if he were indeed their own shepherd. "Because diadem- stones," the jewels of a crown, " are they," borne on the head of a conquering king, and waving high over his land. A beautiful contrast should be noted here between their Syrian foes — sling- stones under foot — and themselves crown-stones, precious gems, set in a crown, and borne aloft over the land on the head of conquerors. 11. For how great is his goodness-, and how great is his beanty! corn shall make the yonng men cheerful, and new wine the maids. There is good reason for this exclamation of surprise and joy in view of the goodness of God to his people, and the beauty of his 34:0 ZECHARIAH.~CHAP. X. providential dispensations as seen in the time of those Syrian wars. In the last clause, " cheerful " is not precisely the idea, but rather fruitful^ prolific^ which, according to well-known Jewish ideas, was one of the most conclusive and joyous proofs of great prosperity. Early marriages, healthful parents, "sons as plants grown up in their youth ; " daugliters as corner-stones, polished after the similitude of a palace : " happy is that people that is in such a case" (Ps. 144: 12-15). "Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them" (Ps. 127: 5). these are the peaceful and pros- perous times that succeed those wars. CHAPTER X. This chapter is a continuation from the close of chapter 9, and hence has for its gi'ound idea the wars of the Maccabees against the Syrian power. V. 1 stands immediately connected with 9 : IT, in- dicating the external prosperity that succeeded those wars ; v. 2 falls back to note the apostasies which brought on this Syrian scourge ; v. 3 the zeal and jealousy of the Lord kindled against the corrupt Jewish leaders, and the remedy for their mischiefs ; in v. 4 men rise up, capable of filling positions of responsible trust; in v. 5 they fight valiantly, because the Ijord is with them, and confounds their foes. In vs. 6-12, on the basis of this great deliverance wrought for his people, the prophet predicts that in times more remote the Lord will work similar but yet more glorious achieve- ments for his Zion. 1. Ask ye of tlie Lord rain in the time of tlie latter rain; so tlie Loed shall make bright clouds, and give them showers of rain, to every one grass in the field. Under the ancient dispensation the Lord gave timely rains and abundant harvests to his people when they were obedient and trustful, and sought him in prayer. He took care to iiave them understand this from the outset. See Dent. 11: 13, 14: — "And it shall come to pass that if ye shall hearken diligently unto my com- mandments which I command you this day, to love the Lord your God, and to serve him with all your heart, and with all your soul, that I will give you the rain of your land in his due season, the first rain and the latter rain, that thou mayest gather in thy corn and thy wine and thy oil." Hence the prophet says here : " Ask of the Lord rain " — it comes for the asking, for the Lord your God hears the prayer of his obedient people. Rain "in the time of the latter rain " was especially useful to perfect the maturing crops. "So the Lord shall give" — not "bright clouds," but "light- nings," always portending rain. The Hebrew words translated " showers of rain " imply abundance — " the rain of great rain " — so ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. X. 341 tliat not in detaolied districts alone, but over the wliole land, " every- one shall have grass in the field." 2. For the idols have spoken vanity, and the diviners have seen a lie, and have told false dreams ; they com- fort in vain : therefore they went their way as a flock, they were troubled because there was no shepherd. The reason is given here why the Lord comes to the rescue ; ''''for the people have been sorely deceived by diviners and by the priests of idol gods, and have been seduced away from me," allud- ing to the antecedent apostasy which was the occasion and procur- ing cause of that fearful Syrian scourge. Historical evidence to this apostasy exists in 1 Mac. 1 : 11-15. The "idols," is in He- brew "the teraphim," household gods which appear not unfre- quently in Jewish history, e. g., withEachel (Gen. 31 : 19" 34); with Michal, Saul's daughter (1 Sam. 19 : 13, 16) ; with Micah in Judges VJ : 5, &c., &c. All the light that came from these gods and diviners was only darkness ; their guidance only misled the people ; the hopes they inspired were worse than vain ; consequently the whole people were led off in a wrong and ruinous way, going en masse^ as a flock of sheep follow the lead given them. They were in great aflSiction (the sense of the word rendered " were troubled "), because there was no competent and real shepherd. 3. Mine anger was kindled against the shepherds, and I punished the goats : for the Loed of hosts hath visited his flock the house of Judah, and hath made them as his goodly horse in the battle. " My wrath " (saith the Lord) " is kindled against those shep- herds " who so mislead the people. " I will punish the he-goats," so called because the he- goat leads the flock. "For the Lord hath visited his flock," implying that he is the real shepherd of the house of Judah, and hath made them victorious in the conflict against then* enemies, crowning them with honor before the nation, as he indicates by comparing them to his own horse, one specially honored by his own use in the day of battle. In the middle of the verse is a play upon the two meanings of the usual Hebrew word for mait,^ which, with a preposition following, equivalent to upo?i, means to inflict judgment ; but standing alone means to look after in a good sense. God will look after those enemies in the sense of visUing upon them his plagues ; but will look after his peo- ple in the sense of looking into their case with kindness, and redress- ing their wrongs with his glorious right arm. 4. Out of him came forth the Corner, out of him the 34:2 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. X. nail, out of him the battle-bow, out of him every oppress- or together. "When the Lord visits Judah in mercy, he gives her the very- blessings she needs — good leaders in place of the bad who had been so sore a curse upon her. Hence out of Judah now come forth the " corner-stone " men, good for bearing the weightiest responsibilities : the " nail " men, to hold things in their right place, or to bear great burdens. " The battle-bow " are the men skilful in the line of war, but the word rendered " oppressor " does not in this passage im- ply any injustice, but only an active, vigorous, and capable ruler. The nail, in oriental use, was rather a spike or tent-pin, sometimes so large that all the kitchen utensils were hung upon it. (iSee Isa. 22 : 23, 25 and Ezra 9 : 8.) 5. And they shall be as mighty men^ which tread down their enemies in the mire of the streets in the bat- tle: and they shall fight, because the Lokd is with them, and the riders on horses shall be confomided. This graphic arid vigorous description of- the Lord's valiant war- riors corresponds admirably with the historic character of the Mac- cabean brothers, who girded themselves for heroic fight in the name of the Lord God of their fathers. They felt that the Lord was with them. The " riders on horses " were their Syrian invaders. The history makes frequent mention of large bodies of horsemen in their armies, e. g.^ 1 Mac. 3 : 39 : "Seven thousand horsemen," and 4 : 1, "one thousand of the best horsemen," &c. They were confounded to meet such power among those despised Jews. 6. And I will strengthen the house of Judah, and I will save the house of Joseph, and I will bring them again to place them ; for I have mercy upon them : and they shall be as though I had not cast them off : for I am the Lord their God, and will hear them. The general conception in this verse is that of reproducing the best days of Israel, e. . 70, in consequence 15* 1^" 34:6 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XI. of their national corruption, and of their blind and mad rejection of their Messiah. The prophet, acting the part of a good shepherd (vs. .4-14), personates the Messiah himself. Acting the part of the foohsh shepherd (vs. 15-17), he personates the Scribes and Pharisees of the Saviour's day. The first three verses, wrought up in high poetic imagery, predict the fall of the nation before the Koman arms ; while the remaining part of the chapter gives the antecedent moral causes of that fall. Whereas those morally blinded and hard- ened Jews had said in the madness of their wrath against the spot- less Redeemer, "His blood be on us and on our children," on them and on their children his blood did come, and their blood flowed like rivers of water ! The Saviour himself had said, " Behold your house is left unto you desolate." Here is an earlier prediction of those fearful retributions. History endorses its accuracy to the very letter. The comprehensive thought of this chapter is, therefore, Judaism, utterly corrupt and apostate, repelling the merciful ef- forts of Tier Redeemer to reclaim and save her, and thus bringing on herself dire destruction. The divisions of the chapter are al- ready indicated incidentally: vs. 1-3, a comprehensive prediction of ruin upon their city and nation ; vs. 4-14, the causes of this ruin shown to lie in the utter corruption of those orders (the priests, scribes, and doctors of the law) who should have been, under God, their good shepherds, and their consequent rejection of their true Shepherd, Jesus, the Messiah. Lastly, vs. 15-17 give the course and doom of those corrupt teachers, specially personated by the prophet, acting the part of a foolish shepherd. 1. Open thy doors, O Lebanon, that the fire may de- vour thy cedars. Lebanon and her lofty cedars represent Jerusalem ; her doors, , the gates of the city. Hence this is a summons to Jerusalem to pre- pare for approaching ruin. The ground of this poetical conception of Lebanon for Jerusalem may be a tacit analogy between them — Lebanon one of the grandest objects in the realm of nature, Jeru- salem in the realm of art ; Lebanon among the works of God, Je- rusalem among the works of man — with, perhaps, a side-look to the fact that the temple was largely built with cedars from Lebanon. 2. Howl, fir-tree, for the cedar is fallen ; because the mighty are spoiled : howl, O ye oaks of Bashan, for the forest of the vintage is come down. The sentiment is — This destruction shall be complete. The lof- tiest and strongest fall; how, then, can the feebler hope to stand ? The same strain of poetic conception is carried through the verse, the grandest trees of the forest representing Jerusalem and other strongholds of the nation. " Wail, O cypress, for tho ce- dar has fallen " {i. e., what were most lofty are now destroyed) ; " wail, ye oaks of Bashan, for the forest of the inaccessible moun- ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XI. 347 tain-lieiglits is laid low." "If these things be done in the green tree, what shall be done in the dry? " 3. There is a yoice of the liowling of tlie slieplierds ; for tlieir glory is spoiled : a voice of the roaring of young lions ^ for the pride of Jordan is spoiled. Here the figures turn from inanimate nature to animate. The ornament and glory of the shepherds are their rich,pastures — now- laid waste. Compare Jer. 25 : 36 : "A voice of the cry of the shep- herds, and an howling of the principal of the flock ; for the Lord hath spoiled their pasture." " The pride of Jordan," in which the young lion made his lair, were the dense thickets along his banks. This phrase was already in use by Jeremiah, whom Zechariah fol- lows remarkably in his terms and phrases. See Jer. 12 : 5, where the " swelling of Jordan " is the same original phrase here rendered "pride of Jordan." So also, Jer. 49:19, and 50: 44 — in all cases said of the thick undergrowths along the Jordan, where the lions had their homes. The sentiment is here the same as above — All classes of people are in distress, for their choicest treasures are wasted; what they most love and value is in ruins. A poetic imagination seizes on the ruin of individual classes, and by a few striking details gives a vivid conception of the universal desola- tion. 4. Thus saith the Loed my God ; Feed the flock of the slaughter; As already stated, vs. 4-14 are a sort of parable — a dramatic scene, in which the prophet personates the Messiah, and represents in himself what the Messiah was to do for the Jewish nation, con- sidered as the people of God. The figure throughout is that of a shepherd and his flock — a figure often applied to the spiritual rela- tions of the Lord to his people. Those who act under and for him, ministering to the religious life of his people, are also called shep- herds, pastors of his people. This figure had become very common in the age of Zechariah, and of the prophets during the captivity. The reader will see, in Ezek. 34 and Jer. 23, how famihar those j)rophets were with this conception, and how much use they made of it to set forth the relations sustained by the Lord toward his peo- ple. It also served with them, as with Zechariah, to represent how fearfully the priests and prophets of that age had degenerated, and were scattering and wasting the sheep of the Lord's pasture. "The flock of the slaughter" means the flock doomed to slaughter for their sins — the Jewish people, now ripe for the fearful retributive judgments of the Almighty. 6. Whose possessors slay them, and hold themselves not giiilty : and they that sell them say, Blessed he the Lord ; for I am rich : and their own shepherds pity them not. 348 ZECHAKIAH.~CHAP.. n. The persons of the drama in this verse are (1.) Th^ fioc\ who are the Jews during the period a. d. 80-'70, conceived of as the flock of the Lord's pastures ; (2.) Their 'buyers (" possessors ") and their sellers^ the Eomans; and (3.) Their own sTiepJierds, the priests, Scribes, and Pharisees, who should have taught them the knowledge of God, but who had no car^ or pity for their deplorable moral condition. Their buyers who buy them for slaughter kill them and are not punished as guilty, because it is of the Lord to scourge the nation for its great sins. The verb here used * has only these two well-established senses : (1.) To sin; (2.) To suffer punishment for sin. See notes on Hos. 5 : 15. It occurs Jer. 2 : 3 and 50 : 7, both of which passages strikingly illustrate the sense of the clause before us. The former, referring to the time when Israel was holi- ness to the Lord, says — " AH that devour him offend^'''' i. e., sin against God, and shall suffer punishment ; " evil shall come upon them, saith the Lord." The latter, referring to a time when the Lord would scourge his people, reads — " All that found them have devoured them ; their adversaries said, "We of end not, because they have sinned against the Lord." It is remarkable that foreign enemies whom the Lord made use of to scourge his people, seem to have in some sort understood why the Lord gave them this license. The king of Assyria (Isa. 36 : 10) said : " Am I now come up with- out the Lord against this land to destroy it? The Lord said unto me. Go up against this land to destroy it." That " they who sell them bless the Lord for their gains," corresponds to the clause, " they are not punished " (" offend not "). They think they are doing God service, and thank him for the personal selfish good they get as if all were morally right. 6. For I will no more pity the inhabitants of the land, saith the Loed : but lo, I will deliver the men every one into his neighbor's hand, and into the hand of liis king : and they shall smite the land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them. The reason for the ruin that comes thus terribly on the covenant people is that God has given them over to destruction for their in- corrigible sins. The repetition of the verb rendered " pity " is a play upon the word, thus : As their shepherds have lost all pity for the moral condition of their flock, so will I abjure all pity for them, flock and shepherd both ; and will give them over to remedi- less ruin. This doom, thus made prophetically specific, is shown by the history to be drawn with entire accuracy. The facts were, that the people had no head ; that intestine discord and civil war were scarcely less destructive than the Eoman sword. Every one was delivered into the hand of his neighbor and into the hand of the Roman king. The slaughter was terrific, scarcely equalled by ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XL 34.9 any other scene recorded in antlientic history. Josephus is the chief original authority. His statements are full and reliable. According to his account, the loss of life on the Jewish side, during that horri- ble siege and capture, could not have been less than eleven hundred thousand ! T. And I will feed the flock of slaughter, even you, O poor of the flock. And I took unto me two staves ; the one I called Beauty, and the other I called Bands ; and I fed' the flock. Not " I will feed," for this fails to give the tense of the origi- nal ; but, " so then I fed the flock doomed to slaughter because of the poor of the flock " — ^. e., out of my pity for the poor ones of the flock — a pertinent and beautiful statement of the labor and love of their own Messiah, who was so often "moved with compassion when he saw the people'as sheep having no shepherd." For the proud and self-righteous and for those who were rich toward this world but not rich toward God, he manifested no specially tender pity ; but for the masses who had no shepherd, and especially for the poor, his heart was tenderly touched. In the line of pure benev- olence he rose indefinitely high above all other religious teachers of every age in this — " he preached the gospel to the poor. ''"' These " staves " were the usual well-known shepherd's crooTc^ the only special instrument used by the shepherd ; useful to him both in the management of the flock, and in repelling its enemies. They represent here those providential agencies by which the Lord aided the pastoral work of the Messiah over his people, as appears from their significant names. The one he called Grace (not so properly " Beauty "), but grace in the sense of that divine favor which re- strained hostile heathen nations from assaulting the people of the Lord w^hile they faithfully served him. The other, "Bands," was a crook of cords, significant of those providential agencies which held the people together in peace. With these aids he acted the part of a shepherd to the flock. 8. Three shepherds also I cut off in one month ; and my soul loathed them, and their soul also abhorred me. The prophet, personating the Messiah, is supposed to have sub- ordinate shepherds under him. These three shepherds cannot mean three individuals. The general strain of the subject forbids this. Besides, Zechariah is wont to present individuals as represent- atives of orders or classes of men. See chap. 3, throughout, where Joshua represents the order of priests ; and 4 : 14, where the two anointed ones must mean the two orders, the regal and the priestly, which were inducted into ofiice by the ceremony of anointing. Here we must suppose that the prophet takes the number three from precisely those three established orders upon whom the pasto- ral responsibility of caring under God for the covenant people de- volved — priests, prophets, and civil magistrates. (See Jer. 2 : 8, 26 350 ZECnARIAH.— CHAP. XL and 18: 18.) Tho&e who represented these classes during ourLord'f public ministry must be specially intended here, probably the priests ; the scribes in the place of the ancient prophets ; and the civil magistrates. The Lord Jesus rejected thein from their places of trust, not instantaneously, but very summarily, as " one month " shows. It was the labor of his public life. The history .of our Lord's public ministry, in its relation to the scribes, doctors of the law, and Pharisees, shows that he and they had not the least com- mon sympathy. He loathed them, as the Hebrew word imphes ; he lost all confidence in their moral integrity and even honesty ; and on the other hand, their soul rebelled against him because of the purity of his character, and the fidelity and pungency of his rebukes of their sin. 9. Then said I, l will not feed you : that that dieth, let it die ; and that that is to be cut off, let it be cut off ; and let the rest eat, every one the flesh of another. The Messiah abandons the flock, the Jewish people, to the sweep of terrible judgments. '• I will be your shepherd no longer." A threefold judgment shall be your extermination ; — pestilence ; the sword from without ; the sword from within ; — the two last look- ing toward (1.) the Koman arras ; (2.) those horrible conflicts of hostile parties which made the very strength of the nation its essen- tial weakness and ruin. Let the pestilence sweep away whom it will ; let the Roman sword drink the blood of the victims so doomed by the will of the Most High ; let every man's teeth be sharpened to devour his neighbor's flesh! The reality set forth in this prophetic language was fearfully terrific! They had said — '' His blood be on us and on our children ! " The Lord responded, '' So let it be ! " Here is the prediction. History verifies it to the letter ! 10. And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people. The first crook, now broken, represented the sundering of the covenant which God is supposed to have made with foreign nations (the sense of " all the people"), to restrain them from harming his chosen. This covenant lay in the divine mind — ^liis purpose to restrain heathen nations from making war on his people. See the same sense in Hos. 2 : 18 : "In that day I will make a covenant for them with the beasts of the field," &c. Compare Job. 5 : 23 and Ezek. 34:25. 11. And it was broken in that day : and so the poor of the flock that waited upon me knew that it was the word of the Lord. The staff once broken, the Eoman arms came down upon the land. " Then the poor of Ihc flock " — Christ's disciples — having ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XI. 351 been apprised by him (Matt. 24 : 15-21), knew that the hour of judg- ment for the land had come, and lied for safety to the mountains of Pella, on the east of Jordan. History records the remarkable fact that not one Christian Jew fell in that awful carnage. All who had faith in their divine Lord gave heed to his warnings. The Lord by his special providence gave them ample time to make good their escape before the city was invested by the Eoman legions. They fled to Pella in the mountains east of the Jordan, and were all safe. 12. And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price ; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver. 13. And the Loed said nnto me, Cast it unto the pot- ter : a goodly price that I was prized at of them. And I took the thirty pieces oi silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the Loed. The great shepherd, about to close his services, proposes in the business settlement that they, the Jews, should give him tlie wages due. It is not implied by the original words that he fixed the price himself. " Give me my price," should rather read, " Give me my hire or reward." He manifestly left it with them to fix the price. He only said. Give me what wages you please, and let me go. They weighed out thirty pieces of silver, the very price for which Judas betrayed him, and the usual price for a slave. (See Ex. 21 : 32.) Maimonides, one of the most reliable ancient Jewish authors, speaks of this as the price of a slave's services, but contemptible for a free man's. The meagreness of it indicates liow low they estimated his services. Precisely this is the intended showing of the transaction. "A goodly price," &c., is ironical, and shows how keenly the insult was felt. It has, moreover, a prophetic outlook toward the very deed of Judas. The Lord said, " Cast it to the potter." He did so. This, too, was one of the points of remarkable coincidence between this symbolic prophecy and one of the prominent scenes in the betrayal of his Lord by Judas. It should be noted that Matthew, having stated that Judas, filled with remorse, returned the price of blood (27: 3-10), says that the chief priests "bought therewith the potter's field to bury strangers in," which thenceforth bore the name of " the field of blood," and that " then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy tlie prophet^ saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value ; and gave them for the potter's field as the Lord appointed me." These words are not found in the Book of Jeremiah, but the general sense and nearly the same words occur in this passage of Eechariah. How came it to pass that Matthew named Jeremiah instead of Zechariah ? It should be considered that Zechariah's words, " the potter," &c., connect his prophecy closely with Jeremiah, chaps. 18 and 19. "The potter" 352 ZEOHARIAH.— CHAP. XL of Jeremiah worked down in the valley of the son of Hinnom, as the expressions " go down " and " went down " (Jer. 18 : 2, 3) ren- der probable, and as the passage (19 : 2) proves, for here the "east gate" is (in Heb.) "the entrance to the potter's gate." There Jeremiah was to denounce upon the people most solemn threaten- ings from the Lord, and then break a potter's vessel before them. The place, already made abominable ; the breaking of the vessel, sig- nificant of a doom for which there can be no remedy ; and the fear- ful solemnity of the message— all conspired to make the association9 connected with this potter's house specially solemn and portentous. These things need to be understood in order to get the full sense of this passage in Zechariah. It may be supposed that Matthew had before his mind the full account of Jeremiah as well as the more brief one of Zechariah, and quoting from memory, assigned to the former what is found as to its precise words most nearly in the latter. It is by no means necessary to the reliability of the Scrip- tures that we prove them perfectly accurate in all the minutest literary points. Let it suffice that every thing vital is right and true, and that every doctrine of any importance is revealed without the least admixture of error. 14. Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel. The phrase " the brotherhood between Judah and Israel " is an historic aUusion to the case of the two nations after the revolt under Jeroboam. Under their mutual relations, brotherhood was peace ; brotherhood broken was civil war. Hence the breaking of this sec- ond staff or crook symbolized the withdrawal of those providential agencies which had kept the people together in friendly relations with each other. Those agencies being withdrawn, intestine discord at once broke out, hostile parties arose, and civil war became their most fearful curse. The history of the period, commencing shortly before the invasion by the Eoraans, and continuing till the city lay in ruins, is a mournful confirmation of this symbolic prophecy. 15. And the Lord said unto me, Take unto thee yet the instruments of a foolish shepherd. 16. For lo, I will raise up a shepherd in the land, which shall not visit those that be cut off, neither shall seek the young one, nor heal that that is broken, nor feed that that stand eth still : but he shall eat the flesh of the fat, and tear their claws in pieces. lY. Wo to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock ! the sword shall he upon his arm, and upon his right eye : his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened. ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XL 353 This passage seems to prove conclusively that the person who is commanded here (v. 15) to " take the instruments of a foolish shepherd," and who was ordered (vs. 4-14) to "feed the flock of slaughter," can he no other than the prophet himself; yet not acting in his own person, or rather not prefiguring aught concern- ing himself; but in vs. 4-14 personating the Messiah during his public ministry; and here (vs. 15-17) personating those priests, scribes, and civil magistrates whom the good shepherd cut off " in one month " (v. 8). The object here is to give a more full view of the character, life, and doom of those faithless shepherds. The passage is very brief; hence we are not told precisely what the " instruments of a foolish shepherd " are. Tliey were not the two crooks, Grace and Bands, as in the former case ; the savage scalpel and butcher-knife would be more appropriate. "Lo, I will raise up a shepherd in the land," &c., reminds us that God is said to do what he providentially permits to be done. As a judgment on those utterly corrupt Jews, the Lord gave them shepherds of like moral corruption. That the prophet should say " a shepherd," as if but one, when the sense is a whole class, an entire body of professedly religious teachers, is in accordance with his usage, as we have seen in the notes on v. 8. The things which this bad shepherd will not do come first in order ; " he will not visit the perishing ; will not seek after the outcasts; will not heal the bruised; will not nourish the halting," who can scarcely walk, i. e., he neglects pre- cisely the very things which a good shepherd should by all means do. On the other hand, with supreme selfishness, he gets all the good he can for himsel* He eats the flesh of the fat ones, and even tears in pieces their hoofs, so eager is he to get the last thing of any value from the carcass. In the clause " Woe to the idol shepherd," the Hebrew word rendered '-''idoV admits this sense, but does not require it, and therefore should not have it here, there being no allusion in the case to idolatry, and the more general sense, of useless^ worthless, faithless, being in point, and fully jus- tified by usage. The judgments on this worthless and wicked shepherd fall on those bodily organs most useful to the shepherd — the arm and the eye. The sense is, that God will utterly paralyze his power for such services, and will moreover send his judgments so in the line of his sins, that they will be a perpetual index and remembrancer of that for which he suffers. As the shepherd would not use his arm and his eye in the care of his flock, the Lord withers them utterly and forever. " To him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin " (Jam. 4 : IT). Wasted talents, powers for good unused, bring down from God the most terrible retribution. 354 ZECHARIAIL— CHAP. XII. CIIAPTEE XII. This chapter manifestly opens a new subject. The first leading Inquiry should respect its general scope and spirit, and the period of time to which it relates. In chapter 11, the Jews of our Saviour's time reject him, their offered Messiah, and bring upon their city and nation an avalanche of ruin. Now the question may be supposed to arise, Is the kingdom of the Messiah therefore utterly broken down? To this inquiry, chapters 12 and 13 reply — By no means. The Lord has yet a " Judah," and a " Jerusalem," and a " House of David : " he will redeem them from their external enemies (see 12 : 2-9) ; and what is yet more to the purpose, be will pour upon them a spirit of grace, suppEcation, and penitence, which shall make them in a far higher and nobler sense his people, and shall insure their glorious prosperity as his people and kingdom. The exposition of this portion of Zechariah involves the inves- tigation and proof of several points : I. The scenes here predicted lie onward in the Christian age siib- aequent to those predicted in chapter 11. (1.) Because, in the absence of proof to the contrary, it should be assumed tbat our author advances in time. He has been thus advancing in his course of thought throughout chaps. 9, 10, and 11. Why not also yet further in chapter 12 ? (2.) Because there is manifestly a close analogy between the order of subjects in the first six chapters (made up of a series of visioys) on the one hand, and chaps. 7-14 (not such visions) on the other. As chaps. 1-4 promise good to Zion, so do chaps. 7-10. As chap. 5, on the other band, pre- dicts the sin and doom of the guilty, so does chap. 11 ; and then as chap. G : 1-8 returns again to God's loving care and protection of his people, and specifically as manifested against hostile nations, so does this chap. 12, and also chap. 14. As the last part of chap. is eminently Messianic, predicting also the ultimate reception of the nations into his kingdom, so we find the same idea in these chapters 12-14, and especially in chap. 14. (3.) Because manifestly we are in this chapter borne on beyond the date of chap. 9, for there the Lord was protecting his people against Alexander and his Syrian successors ; here against " all nations " (vs. 2, 3, 9) ; and, moreover, here we have passed the crucifixion of Christ (which is essentially involved in chap. 11), for the people bewail their guilt in that act (see v. 10). The location of these events in time must therefore be onward, after the advent of Messiah. So much may be considered as fixed. But other questions remain. II. It is a question of no trifling hnportance whether the terms "Israel," "Judah," "Jerusalem," "the house of David," are to be taken here literally or figuratively. Is " Judah " in these cliapters (12-14) the very Judah of Zechariah's time ; are her people the hneal descendants of Abraham ; and does the lineal Jew here, as then and there, represent and embody the earthly kingdom of God? Is ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XII. 355 Jerusalem still, as of old, her capital, and the centre and tlirone of Messiah's kingdom? Do the Gentile hosts besiege her literally, as the Chaldeans had done so recently when Zechariali was writ- ing? 1 cannot think so, for these reasons: (1.) "With the events predicted (chap. 11), the literal Judah and Jerusalem ceased to he the recognized visible Church and kingdom of God on earth. It is the precise purpose of chap. 11 to affirm this fact. Consequently, ever since the apostolic age, Church history has taken on a new type. No Church historian thinks of looking for the Christian Church in tlie Jewish line. (2.) Whatever Old Testament prophecy is clearly shown to refer to the New Testament age must, by all legitimate rules of interpretation, be construed in accordance with New Testament light, with gospel ideas, with the new principles of Messiah's kingdom, then first fully brought out. Hence the Judah and Jerusalem of gospel prophecy, standing as types and symbols of Messiah's kingdom, must be construed, not literally, but figura- tively — -just as "the temple" is no longer, as of old, tlie one place of God's dwelling, and of all acceptable worship, but the Christian " temple " is the living pious heart. (3.) That the Jews shall re- turn again — ^not to their own land merely, but to Judaism restored after the order of Moses ; that Jerusalem shall again become the living centre of all visible v'orship, and of all the true religion of the world — this worship conforming itself, as of old, to the Mosaic ritual ; and that, as such, Judah shall be invaded and Jerusalem besieged by all the Gentile nations of the earth, according to the literal construction of chapters 12 and 14, are not things even sup- posable. If the New Testament is held to be of any account, Juda- ism, after the order of Moses, is dead, and those ideas must hence be rejected. For, practically, that state of things must ignore all the Christianity of the Gentile world — all the actual Christianity of the whole world as it now is, and as it has been since the death of Christ. Can any sane man believe that all the Gentile Christian churches are at some future period to be annihilated ; the religious world be put back to its condition and relations as in the age of Zech- ariali ; bloody sacrifices and passovers and feasts of tabernacles be restored, and Judah and Jerusalem stand as the sole representatives of the Church of God upon the earth ? Or can it be believed that all the great nations of the present or of any future age shall gather in one vast crusade against the converted Christian Jews in their own land to besiege Jerusalem, and to exterminate all true rehgion from the face of the eai'th ? The literal construction of chapters 12-14 would hold us to such results : therefore the literal construc- tion must be promptly rejected. (4.) Nor let it be thought that we do violence to the laws of language when we reject the literal and adopt the figurative sense under such circumstances as these. Let the reader ask himself — How should a Jewish prophet, writing in the midst of Judaism, with no other history of the Church before him, and no other conception of the Church in his mind but that of Judaism, with no other first readers but Jews, write of the future 356 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XII. Cliiircli and Idngdom of God in the gospel age? Shall we demand that he write of the Christian Church and of millennial times in New Testament words and phrases, and with fully-developed New Tes- tament ideas? Let us remember that the time had not come for such ideas. Let us recall the striking fact that more than three years' personal communion with Jesus himself, and no small amount of his personal labor, quite failed to convert his disciples from Jewish to Christian ideas ; that only the shock given to the old system by his death, aided by the subsequent teaching of the Holy Ghost, availed, and then rather slowly, to effect this great change. How absurd, then, to expect that the Hebrew prophets and their first readers could readily reach those new ideas and take in the sense of Christian as contrasted with Jewish phraseology! Plainly, those Jewish prophets and their first readers must think of Christianity only as of Judaism extended and purified ; must con- ceive of a world converted only as a world coming up to Jerusalem to worship ; and must conceive of irrehgion, infidelity, every form of hostility to Christ, as the gathering of nations for war against Jerusalem and Judah, to crush them from the face of the earth.— — Hence when we speak of Jewish costume and drapery as clothing gospel ideas in these sublimely grand and glorious prophecies, we are not parting company with common sense. We are simply in- terpreting in harmony with the stern necessities of their condition. Jewish minds, with no other than Jewish training, must think so and speak so, by the inevitable laws of human thought. III. Consequently, it is no longer a question whether, in these remaining prophecies of Zechariah (chap. 12-14), we arc to find blessings for the Gentile world; even the extension of the gospel to all the nations of the earth. If these prophecies relate to times subsequent to the death of Christ, they must predict the prosperity of the Christian Church, the conversion of the world to Immanuel. It might be a much more difli- cult question (were it needful to be settled) whether the lineal Jew is here, and if so, where and by what marks we shall identify him. If he were named here alongside of his brother Gentile, as Paul names them in Eom. 11, it would be easy to make this dis- crimination. But it is at least supposable that in the greater part of these three chapters there is no intention to discriminate between Jew and Gentile. If so, how can it be expected that a discreet in- terpreter should make any distinction ? Interpreters should not be asked to make prophecy, nor to put into it what was not there be- fore ; but only to unfold the sense already there. It may be weU to remember also that the change wrought in the transition from Judaism to Christianity, fitly described as a " breaking down of the middle wall of partition between us " (Eph. 2 : 14), aimed not to thrust the Jew out, but to let the Gentile in ; to abolish henceforth all distinction as to Christian rights and privileges, and make both one henceforth in Christ Jesus. Why, then, may not Old Testa- ment prophecy assume precisely this state of the future kingdom ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XII. 357 of tlie Messiah ? The thoughtful reader can scarcely fail to ap- preciate the importance of these points, and if so, will not account this discussion unreasonably full or protracted. Chapter 12 is naturally in two parts, of which the first (vs. 1-9) represents Judah as invaded and Jerusalem as besieged by the combined powers of all nations ; but the Lord delivers them. The second part (vs. 10-14) represents the house of David and the peo- ple of Jerusalem as deeply penitent for their sins, especially the sin of crucifying their Messiah. In my comments on this chapter, I propose first to explain the words and phrases so far as may seem necessary, and then to speak of its general scope and fulfilment as prophecy. ^ 1. The burden of the word of the Lord for Israel, saith the Loed, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him. This prophecy is a " lurden upon Israel " only to a limited ex- tent, for the assault of all nations upon her and the siege of Jerusa- lem were transient, ending soon in complete victory on Zion's side. ——That help comes from the Lord alone, who is mighty to save, is indicated by the allusion to his great and glorious works of creation. 2. Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when thej shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem. The phrase rendered " cup of trembling " is read by some, " threshold of shaking " — one upon which a violent assault should be made, but which should react in ruin upon the assailants. There seems, however, to be no good reason for rejecting the usual sense of the words "a cup of reeling, intoxication" — with reference to that very common conception of the wine-cup of the wrath of the Lord which maddens and infatuates nations doomed to ruin. (Sec Jer. 25 : 15-81, and notes on Nahum 1 : 10). All the nations are thought of as gathered against Judah and Jerusalem. In the last clause the sense is, that what the Lord had said of Jerusalem should be true of Judah also in the siege of her capital. 3. And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burden- some stone for all people : all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it. The reference to a burdensome stone alludes to a custom among the Jewish young men of trying their strength at hfting a very heavy stone as high as possible, in which some were wont to get wounds and bruises. Such a stone, fully equal to one's ut- most strength, and often beyond it, should Jerusalem be to the na- 358 ZECHAEIAH.— CHAP. XII. tions. The stone itself is not harmed bj the lifting, but the lifters thereof were sure to be lacerated. 4. In that day, saith the Lokd, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his rider with madness : and I will open mine eyes npon the honse of Judah, and will smite every horse of the people with blindness. Remarkably, the Lord accounts horses to be a power hostile to Christ's kingdom. This appears throughout Zechariah, and aids us to the true conception of Messiah's riding on an ass (9 : 9). The warring enemies of God's people come on horses, this animal being associated with human pride and rebellion against God. This astonishment and madness are among the eifects of the cup of in- toxication, given to God's enemies to drink, I^ote the beautiful antithesis. God smites with blindness the warring powers of his foes, but opens his own eyes wide on his people to see their wants and to provide therefor. 5. And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The inhabitants of Jerusalem shall he my strength in the Loed of hosts their God. 6. In that day will I make the governors of Judah like a hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf ; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left : and Je- rusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem. Y. The Lord also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah. Without saying it openly, yet in their secret thought, the gov- ernors of Judah are relying for their own protection under God on the military strength of Jerusalem and the valor of her defenders. But the Lord will make Judah safe and mighty against her foreign foes, as a hearth of fire to its fuel, which itself burns not, but only facilitates the burning of the wood, or as a torch of fire to a sheaf, which consumes it with no danger to itself. So shall they devour the gathered nations who assail them. And " Jerusalem, too, shall still sit on her throne in her own place," on her own foundations. The Lord saves Judah first, that he may forestall the pride of self- reliance on the strength and glory of the city. So vital to true re- ligion is it to crucify all human glorying, to cherish the spirit of absolute dependence on the Lord alone, and to give him for ever- more all the glory as the source of all spiritual fife and of all power for good to Zion. ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. Xn. 359 8. In that day sliall tlie Loed defend tlie inhabitants of Jerusalem ; and he that is feeble anions; them at that day shall be as David ; and the lionse of i)avid shall l)e as God, as the angel of the Lord before them. The Lord defends Jerusalem, yet not without their own concur- rent agency. The doctrine that God saves his people must not he abused to human inaction. He saves rather by augmenting and reanimating their strength than by superseding their agency. So here, the feeble shall be as David, who is the type of a most ath- letic warrior ; and the men of David's cast and power shall be now as God, even as the angel of Jehovah — the uncreated one who had so often appeared in forms of majesty and power. This is a strong ligure, and must represent a vast augmentation of spiritual force in the people of God. 9. And it sliall come to j)ass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jernsa- lem. ISTow the Lord sets himself earnestly to destroy all the nations that array themselves in hostile mood against his people and their sacred city. 10. And I will ponr npon the honse of David, and npon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications : and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth lor his only son, and shall be in bitter- ness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his first-born. These terms are strongly in contrast with those in v. 9. God will seek to pour out vengeance and ruin on those hostile nations; but grace, mercy, and blessings on Jerusalem. To " pour out " is to bestow in large and abundant measure. It is the usual phrase for the effusions of the Holy Spirit, as in Joel 2 : 28 — " I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh." In this passage, "the Spirit " is the Holy Spirit of God, and not a quality or grace in man. It is thought of, however, as producing piety and prayer in the hearts of men, and hence is called " the Spirit of grace and of supplications " — meaning that Divine Spirit, whose special work it is to beget as to one's self a tender prayerful frame of mind, and as to others a lov- ing compassion for the souls of men, and earnest prayer for their salvation. " Grace " in man stands for that which is specially pleasing to God, and which secures his fivor. In the case of sin- ners, the first buddings of grace are penitence and prayer, a broken and contrite spirit, which inspires prayer both for our own pardon and for mercy on other sinners also. The close connection between the gift of this Spirit, begetting such grace and supplications, and the " looking upon him whom they have pierced," shuts us up to 360 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XII. this sense of the passage — its leading thought being the conversion of sinners. To "look on me whom tliey have pierced " can mean nothing else than thinking of their guilt in crucifying the Lord of glory. They now look upon the crucified One with bitter peni- tence and grief for the sin of piercing his heart, and with imploring cries for pardon through his own blood. This sin of piercing the Lord belongs not alone to that Eoman soldier who drove the nails into his hands and his feet, nor to him alone whose spear opened his side, but obviously to all who participated then and there in his death, and indeed to that indefinitely greater mass who in all ages have had the same wicked heart as they had, and have abused, in- sulted, scorned, and rejected Jesus Christ in a spirit like theirs. All such have crucified the Son of God afresh, reenacting the very scenes of Calvary, and its very sins too ! But when, touched by the Spirit of God, they look on the crucified One as pierced by their own hands, and when they think of their own sins as the nails and the spear that gave him his bitterest pangs, and then take also into view the wonderful truth that, despite of such abuse from myself, that murdered Saviour loves me in his pity still, and oflTers me par- don as it were through the blood my own guilty hands have shed, O then the deep fountains of my grief burst open, and for once, if never before, it is a luxury to weep. Thousands have felt this bit- terness of grief for their sins against the crucified One, made doubly keen by the sense of his enduring and forgiving love, despite of guilt so black and ingratitude so vile ! Such I take to be the thought of this passage. This mourning for sin is as when one mourns over an only son, lost in death ; its bitterness is as that over a first-born. Ask the real parent's heart for the depth of an- guish in such mourning ! 11. In that day tliere shall be a great moiiming in Jerusalem, as the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the valley of Megidd^n. 12. And the land shall mourn, every family apart ; the family of the house of David apart, and their wives apart; the family of the house of l^athan apart, and their wives apart ; 13. The family of the house of Levi apart, and their wives apart ; the family of Shimei apart, and their wives apart; 14. All the families that remain, every family apart, and their wives apart. This mourning for sin against the slain Messiah is not restricted to a few, but is widely extended ; it is " a great mourning in Jeru- salem," like that over the death of the good King Josiah, who fell in battle against I^echo, king of Egypt, iu the valley of Megiddon, the long-famed battle-ground of Esdraelon. See the history in 2 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XII. 361 Chron. 85 : 23-25 and 2 Kings 23 : 29, 30. Note here that this mourning for sin is not merely a public thing : puhlic mournings are sometimes a pageant only, with more of display than of heartfelt grief. This is so much a personal matter, lying between each individual soul and his Saviour, that each one is drawn to weep and mourn apart and alone. Every instinct leads the mourner to seek solitude, and to pour out his whole heart there, under no other eye than God's ! Who has not felt this impulse toward silent, se- cret mourning, under such mingled shame and grief, coupled with the conviction that your whole concern is now with that crucified One whose heart you have pierced, and whose possible mercy is now your only hope ? The mode of presenting this thought is by Jewish terms and historic allusions. The house of David and the house of Nathan, one of his sons, in the royal line ; then the house of Levi and the house of Shimei, one of his sons, represent- ing the priesthood ; — these stand for the whole people, and show that they all mourn apart, and their wives apart. The first verse of the next chapter belongs with this, showing that such penitence and prayer bring pardon full and free. " In that day a fountain is opened for sin and for uncleanness " " to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem " — the same' on whom (12 : 10) the spirit of grace and of supplication is poured out. In that blood which their own guilty hands have shed, is pardon found for aU the truly penitent. That this chapter must relate to events subsequent to the death of Christ — that it concerns the Christian Church and the gospel age, and therefore must be interpreted according to Few Testament ideas — has been already said, and I trust adequately shown. It still remains to inquire whether its fulfilment can be located yet more definitely, and if so, wliere ; and whether now past or yet future. It may be proper for me to say that during several years past, and until this present reinvestigation, I have been inclined to locate the fulfilment of this portion of Zechariah, chapters 12-14, yet in the future — ^near or in tlie millennial age. I must now modify this opinion so far at least as to suggest the strong probability that this chap. 12, looks primarily to a series of events that occurred within the first three centuries of the Christian era. My reasons for this view fall under two different heads : (1). The consecu- tive order of Zechariah's prophecies throughout chapters 9-11, which, unless some reason appear to the contrary, should continue also through chap. 12. Thus in chap. 9 : 1-8, we have the conquer- ing sweep of Alexander's armies, over Persia, Syria, Tyre, and Philistia, while God protected Judah — all in the fourth century before Christ; then, in 9:11-17 and 10:1-5, the wars of the Syrians in the age of the Maccabees, in the second century before Christ; then in chap. 11, the very events of Christ's personal ministry, his being rejected by the Jews, and their consequent destruction by the Komans — all in the period a. d. 1-70. This regular order of time suggests with very considerable force whether 16 362 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XH. chap. 12 does not continue on with no great chasm into the Chris- tian age. (2.) But a second reason, certainly worthy of considera- tion, is that, adopting the principles of interpretation already pre- sented, we find great events to which these prophetic descriptions very accurately correspond. Thus in 12 : 1-9, the leading idea is that of persecution, a fierce and hloody onslaught upon the Church of God. A Jewish prophet could not depict an era of persecution in any other form so definite and decisive as this. Judah invaded, Jerusalem besieged and assailed by heathen nations; this in the Cliristian age can be nothing else but violent persecution. And who does -not know that the history of the Church during the first three centuries is largely the history of persecutions ? The Church is bitterly and cruelly assailed; but she is like "the bush that burned with fire, yet was not consumed," or in this prophet's own figures, not less pertinent, she is a cup of reeling to all that besiege her; a burdensome stone they cannot lift, however much they essay it, and can by no means harm, but are only themselves harmed thereby ; or yet more fitly, she is a hearth of fire, and her enemies the burning fuel ; or a torch, and they the sheaf that readily takes fire and is consumed. So the Church stood the shock of persecution unshaken; bore its fires unscathed; became only the more pure, grew only with the more rapid growth ; while on her enemies the wrath of the Lord came down to their uttermost destruc- tion. Must we not account this series of historic events as fully answering to the drift of these prophetic representations ? Taking this natural harmony between the historic facts and the prophetic portrayals, in connection with the probable continued consecution of the prophetic steps along the track of time, is there not at least a very high degree of probability that this is the true interpretation of Zech. 12:1-9? We come next to the closing portion 12 : 10-14 and 13 : 1. Here it should be borne in mind that chap. 11 has virtually assumed the rejection of Messiah by his covenant people and his consequent crucifixion. It is hence but fit that the Lord, through his prophet, should meet the natural inquiry — What was the result of his violent death? Did it utterly crush the young germ of the shoot and scion of David? Did it wither the hopes of the world, and the raised expectations of the hierarchies of heaven ? Did it ring the death-knell of Zion's promised future glory ? Not at all ; noth- ing of the sort. Indeed, that very death on the cross unsealed the fountains of spiritual power ; brought down the glorious effus- ions of the Spirit of God ; made the hearts of even his murderers like water in the tenderness of their contrition and the outflow of their sorrows, and drew the hearts of millions, with a power of at- traction never known on earth before, into loving gratitude and all- consuming zeal and labor for the risen Redeemer of men. Is not such the plain teaching of this most wonderful passage? We scarcely need, therefore, to ask more particularly when it was ful- filled. Its fulfilment began, we may say, on the day of Pentecost ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XII.' 363 when God first " poured out the Spirit of grace and of supplica- tions," and when three thousand men " were pricked in their heart " in view of this very fact that they had taken Him of E'azareth, and by wicked hands had crucified and slain him. Its fulfilment continued on through that glorious age of gospel tri- umphs. It continues still wherever the sense of Christ crucified goes deep to the heart, and, under the Spirit's light, men feel that tliey have themselves been his betrayers and murderers. The fountain opened for the penitent people of the house of David is only the great fact of the gospel age, the way of pardon revealed and brought out fully to glorious light through the atonement of the crucified Son of God. It need not be assumed that these prophecies are exhausted in those events to which they primarily refer. Their truths are for all time, and their fulfilment in this sense cannot be exhausted until the gospel shall cease to be " the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth." So long, the agencies of outward violent persecution shall never crush the true Church, but only serve to purify her the more; so long, a Saviour crucified shall be the power of God, through the Iloly Ghost, unto penitence, and prayer, and pardon, and anew and holy life unto God and the Lamb. If any objection can be plausibly urged against the explanation al)Ove given of this chapter 12, as already fuliiUed prophecy^ it will be on the ground that vs. 10-14 are thus put, in time, Jyefore vs. 1-9 ; whereas, according to their order of sequence, they should come after. My answer is twofold: (1.) Claiming a large abatement from the facts as stated in the objection. (2.) Accounting for the relative location of the two passages on other grounds than the order of time. (1.) The objection assumes that as to time, the passage (vs. 10-14) looks to the death of Christ and to the immediate efiects of that death upon its authors. 1 answer : Such limita- tion as to its efects is by no means necessary or natural. And the moral ejects of that death, not the death itself as an historic event, are here the subject of remark. These moral 65*6018 are thought of as characterizing the gospel dispensation — specially prominent indeed in its opening era, but characteristic of it throughout. V. 10 is not connected with what precedes it as an event that closely follows in time. The Hebrew language would naturally indicate such a connection by the future with vav conversive. But here the connective particle might as well be rendered " Jwif," indicating an event of an opposite antithetic character. And the thought that follows is obviously antithetic to what precedes. This relation of the two thoughts determined the location of the latter passage. I will seek to pour out judgments unto their destruction on the na- tions that come against Jerusalem ; but the grace of my Spirit unto salvation on Jerusalem herself. This is manifestly the law of thought that suggested the passage, v. 10-14. That is, vs. 1-9 give the judgments of God against the sworn, violent enemies of his Churcli; vs. 10-14 the blessings that come through the death of Christ, and the mission of his Spirit upon the Church and people. 364 ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XIH. CHAPTER XIII. The first verse, as already intimated, belongs very properly to the previous chapter, since it stands in the closest relations of thought with the penitence of the people for their sins against the Lord Jesus. The next point made is the purifying of the people from their sins, as shown by specifying two most besetting sins of the ancient Hebrews, idolatry and false prophesying, both of which are thoroughly removed from the land (vs. 2-6). Then, by association of ideas, the crucified Messiah is brought to view (v. 7) ; finally, the ungodly portion are cut off", only one-third part remaining, but these are purified by stern disciphne, and come to know Jehovah as their God (vs. 8, 9). 1. In that day there shall be a foimtain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness. 2. And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the LoED of hosts, that I will cut off the names of the idols out of the land, and they shall no more be remembered : and also I will cause the prophets and the unclean spirit to pass out of the land. The manner of Zechariah is to affirm a general truth by affirm- ing certain individual facts which are left to imply it. So here, to sliow that the land is purified from its great sins, he makes no gen- eral statements, but simply individualizes two of the prominent and most dangerous sins of the covenant people — idolatry and false prophecy — and represents them to be effectually exterminated. " Cutting off the very names of idols, so that they should be no more remembered," implies that idolatry is thoroughly expelled from the land. (See Hos. 2: 17 and 14 : 8 and Mic. 5 : 12-14.) The " prophets " named here in connection with idols before and "the unclean spirit " after, must be /a^e prophets, called prophets only because they falsely and foully assumed this name. The Lord will drive them out of the land, forcibly expel them. The refer- ence to an "unclean spirit " recognizes Satanic agency. 3. And it shall come to pass,iAossibly be the correct view ; but there are serious objections to it: (1.) The facts of history do not verify it ; the proportion cut off being much more than two parts out of three, and the saved being less than one in three. (2.) The saved are here thought of as being the entire visible Ohm-ch of God. But in fact, the Church in the apostolic age was far more of Gentiles than of Jews. (3.) This construction is out of the chronological order which runs not only through chapters 9-11, but also through chapters 12 and 13, up to the digression which takes us back for a moment to the cru- cifixion in 13 : 7. Chapter 12 : 1-9 gives us the Christian Church passing through its first three ccntures, a period of persecution. Chapter 12: 10 to 13: 1 gives the effect of Messiah's death as through the Holy Ghost a power unto penitence, prayer, and pardon. Chap. 13 : 2-6, the great advance made in the Christian Church in real piety, presented by means of Jewish historic allusions, but manifest- ly meaning that the people of God are, through divine mercy, redeemed from reigning sin, and brought into a far higher state of Christian life than the covenant people had reached during the ages before Christ. Thus far, then, the reader will notice a somewhat regular chronological order, a progress onward in time in the course of thought. It is reversing tliis course to go back in this passage (13 : 8, 9) to the date of chap. 11. It quite breaks out of the line of historic events in which we were moving in the passage 13: 2-6. 1 therefore suggest another construction, viz. : that vs. 8, 9 lie in the same line of thought with vs. 2-6, and looking to a somewhat later period in the Christian age, give us the corruptions of Christian- ity^ and indicate that God will sever those corrupt portions, prior to the millennial age. It is obvious that chap. 14 gives us first the opening scenes and then the full consummation of millennial purity and glory. If we give due heed to the chronological succession of prophetic events in this prophet through chapters 9 to 18 : 6, and allow for continued progress on the same grade of advance, we shall find ourselves drawing nigh the millennial age in the closing verses of chap. 13. It has been already suggested that the main reason for applying vs. 8 and 9 to the lineal Jews at the point where they took sides for Christ or against him in the latter half of the first cen- tury, is the assumption that they stand closely connected with v. 7. This class of interpreters would paraphrase thus: "Smite the shepherd, then shall the ancient covenant people be scattered and broken up; two parts of them shall reject Jesus Christ and perish miserably under the Roman arms; the remaining third part -shall be- come the beloved and sanctified people of God." But instead of this, the connection may be quite different, thus : The manifestation of Jesus Christ in the flesh served to reveal the utter rottenness of the visible Jewish chiu-ch. When the shepherd was smitten, the mass of that church went to ruin ; only a few of the little ones were saved. So, in the advanced ages of the Christian Church, cor- ruption became again fearfully prevalent, and another great sifting process became indispensable before the era of the final conquest ZECHARIAH.— CHAP. XIII. 369 and triumph of Christ's kingdom could open. That is, as v. 7 came in under the influence of association of ideas, so it goes out and v. 8 comes in, under the same general law of analogy — v. 7 standing alone as a diversion from the current strain of chronological thought. The analogy hetween the corrupt Judaism of the Saviour's day on the one hand, and the corrupt Christianity of the mediosval Christian age, onward indeed to the present day, is the law of connection he- tween V. 7 and v. 8. In support of this view, let it be noted that the prophet does not put the eighth verse in close connection as to time with verse 7. He does not say, " in that day^ two parts therein shall be cut ofltj" &c. Let the reader notice how constantly he has used this phrase wherever he meant this thing, as e.