GIFT OF A. F. Morrison BIOLOGY LURARY iHnfform witb tbe present IDolume. Crown &vo, cloth extra, 6s. THE POETS' BIRDS. BY PHIL ROBINSON. "A simply delightful book." Illustrated London News, "Mr. Phil Robinson's volume a book which may be described as one half classified extracts from the poets, the other half a humorous defence of birds whom they have neglected or maligned is a very pleasant one. The one half of Mr. Robinson's book may be set against the other ; and an anthology which contains poems like Shelley's 'Skylark,' and a hundred touches, at once truthful and imaginative, from Keats and Byron and Burns, and many a lesser poet of the country like Grahame or Leyden, more than compensates for a certain want of variety in the allusions to greenfinches and crakes. But either half is very pleasant reading, more especially to those who combine with a love of poetry some knowledge of the woods and fields." St. James's Gazette. " Mr. Phil Robinson has hit upon a happy idea. . . . Throughout the book one is struck both by the author's exceptional knowledge of bird-nature and by his not less exceptional industry in the accumulation of material. . . . We can hardly be too hearty in our praise. The work is not only of great interest but of solid useful- ness." Derby Mercury. " Both informative and entertaining." Sco tsman. " Mr. Phil Robinson writes charmingly and originally in this well-filled volume. His book consists mainly of extracts from English verse, strung together by certain short essays or remarks in the peculiar Robinsonian style of humour. What little of his own Mr. Robinson does vouchsafe us is, as usual, pretty and graceful, one half close observation in natural history, the other half delicate fancy and playful solemnity of his wonted mock-serious sort. There is a vast deal of genuinely valuable criticism underlying most of our author's seemingly playful and extravagant strictures, and rising writers of the new school, who attend so closely to all the delicate refinements of form in poetry, might do worse than take a leaf out of his amusing book. It is needless to add that Mr. Robinson's fowls are studied from the very life, that out of the fulness of knowledge and observation his tongue has spoken words of wisdom on all the feathered things from China to Peru, and from England to the Cape of Good Hope. Nobody is better fitted by nature and opportunity to produce just such a work, with just such a mixture of strong literary flavour, wide information, and minute zoological accuracy." Pall Mall Gazette. "The book is decidedly entertaining, and contains much information of a useful kind." Literary World. "A very charming book, its only fault being that it is a little too encyclopaedic in character, and that its author, in his laudable desire to be absolutely exhaustive, has not given us as much as we should have liked of his own original and unique humour. There is no other work like this in the English language ; and dip into it where we will, we are sure to find really delightful reading." World. "The book is remarkable both in its conception and execution, and does great honour to the diligence and patient toil of one whose knowledge of English poetry in its full extent can hardly be surpassed." Tablet, LONDON : CHATTO & WINDUS, 214 PICCADILLY, W. "dniform witb tbe present iDolume. Crown 8vo, cloth extra> 6s. THE POETS' BEASTS, BY PHIL ROBINSON. " Mr. Robinson brings to his task a wide acquaintance with English poets, a bright and graceful fancy, a quaint and original humour, and the peculiar faculty, which has been so notable in some of his other works, of giving a special individuality, an almost human personality, to the different animals, whether birds, beasts, or insects, which he is describing. Besides these qualifications, he has enjoyed the acquaint- ance of many of the poets' beasts, in their natural condition, in India and elsewhere, and is thus able to enrich his pages with many novel and authentic anecdotes." Guardian. " The task of writing a sequel to ' The Poets' Birds,' which should not suggest unfavourable comparisons, could not have been accomplished by any one but Mr. Phil Robinson. "' The Poets' Beasts," however, fully deserves to take equal rank with its charming predecessor. It is a delightful companion for a leisure hour." dole. "Mr. Phil Robinson knows the poets intimately, and he seems to know the beasts equally well ; so this book, which is a discourse upon the treatment of the latter by the former, is a book which ought to be, and we are quite sure will be, equally popular among lovers of both. Then, too, he has a fund of the most delicious humour of that dainty, more ethereal kind that we recognise in the best work of Addison and in the average work of Charles Lamb. . . . There is not a chapter or a page in the book that is not full of thoroughly genial entertainment." Manchester Examiner. " Mr. Phil Robinson's 'The Poets' Beasts' is as erudite, as chatty, and as fresh as his delightful work on Birds." World. " Mr. Phil Robinson has devoted a great deal of study and research to his subject, and has produced a lively and interesting volume of poetical and other lore of the animal world. " British Quarterly Review. " Those who have read ' The Poets' Birds ' will need no recommendation to read the sequel. It is a delightful book, at once instructive and amusing. A strong vein of quaint humour runs through the book, and the author displays a wide knowledge of the habits of wild animals, and a warm love for animated nature. There are few people, old or young, who will not heartily enjoy 'The Poets' Beasts."' Standard. " The well-known characteristics of Mr. Phil Robinson's writings, his charming originality of style, which in easy colloquial fashion gives proofs of deep learning and varied experiences, his poetic grace, his good-natured but keen sarcasm, vivid sense of humour, and broad humanity, are all found at their brightest and best in this delightful volume." Morning Post. " A book which all lovers of animals will read with great delight. . . . Having come to the end of the book, and enjoyed every individual page of it, it is impossible to say whether we have been more amused or instructed. A more fascinating way of learning natural history could scarcely be devised." Christian World. "'jThe Poets' Beasts' is wholly unique in character. . . . Mr. Phil Robinson writes with rare fancy and originality on the false and one-sided views with which mankind generally, and the poets in particular, have regarded the beast world. . . . Altogether, the work forms a valuable contribution to the criticism of English poetry, and to the formation of a just and true standard of judgment in regard to the animal world." Daily Telegraph. LONDON : CHATTO & WINDUS, 214 PICCADILLY, W. THE POETS AND NATURE THE POETS AND NATURE REPTILES, FISHES, AND INSECTS BY PHIL ROBINSON \* AUTHOR OF "THE POETS* BIRDS," "THE POETS* BEASTS," ETC.' CHATTO & WINDUS, PICCADILLY 1893 GIFT OP QLs/ BIOLOGY UBRARY PREFATORY NOTE. IN order to anticipate the discovery by others that I have omitted some of the Poets Insects, I avail myself of the Author's privilege of a Preface to say that my list does not contain, except incidentally, any of the beetles (although such notable insects as the "book-worm " and the "death-watch " are of the tribe), any of the "gnats " or wasps, both so cordially detested by the Poets, or any of their favourite worms. Among the fishes, again, owing to a mishap to manuscript, there is a hiatus, which would be of no importance but for the con- sequent omission of Thomson's lines on Angling already largely drawn upon, however, in my " Poets' Beasts" Acting on the advice of my Friends (the Critics of my two previous volumes], I have added an Index to this, the third, and hope that their prediction of the increased usefulness of my work from such an addition may be fulfilled. The task which the publication of this volume completes was undertaken by the Author, and accepted by his Publishers as one which should be of use to men of letters ; and it has been a great pleasure to notice, during the last four years, from the columns of newspapers and the pages of magazines, reviews, and books, that our expectations have been satisfactorily realised ; and I can assure those Writers who, after availing themselves of the quotations which I had brought together expressly for their R95656 * viii Prefatory Note. service, have gone on to reproduce my comments, that I accept their recognition of the object of my compilation as a compli- ment, even when they have translated me to their own books, a page at a time, without any acknowledgment, and even when, mistaking me for an obsolete and extinct Person, they have respectfully regretted that I had not survived to the Tenny- sonian Epoch, when many of my opinions might have been altered for the better. Wherein Jean Ingelow is delightfully avenged. For having in my first volume premised that I was not dealing with "contemporary" Poets, I quoted largely from that most charming Writer ; and my feelings may or may not be imagined on receiving, a few days after the publication of my book, an invitation to a garden-party, signed "Jean Ingelow /" My pleasure in discovering my mistake was increased by being thus enabled to dedicate my second volume to one of the most exquisite Poets of Nattire and most tender Interpreters of the speechless world. PHIL ROBINSON. January 1893. CONTENTS. PART I. fcoete' IReptiles. CHAP. PAGE i. "REPTILES" AND "VERMIN" 3 II. CROCODILES, TURTLES, AND LIZARDS . . . . .12 III. SNAKES IN NATURE 33 IV. SNAKES IN TRADITION 55 V. SNAKES IN POETRY 7$ VI. THE TUNEFUL FROG QO VII. THE LOATHED PADDOCK . . IOO PART II. poets' fftebes. I. FISH-MONSTERS AND MYTHS IO9 II. FISHES OF THE ANGLE 1 17 III. SOME POETIC FISH-FANCIES . . . . . .131 IV. SOME SHELL-FISHES 145 V. THE POETS' DOLPHIN 152 Contents. PART III. poets' CHAP. I. ANTS AND BUTTERFLIES II. NIGHT-MOTHS AND DAY-MOTHS III. ARACHNE AND THE POETS iv. FLIES: "THE HOSTS OF ACHOR" V. GRASSHOPPERS, CRICKETS, AND LOCUSTS VI. LUCIFERS AND THE POETS vii. DEBORAH: "THE HONEY-BEE" PAGE l6l 178 194 214 . 235 248 264 INDEX . . 179 PART L THE POETS' REPTILES. THE POETS AND NATURE. PART I. THE POETS' REPTILE'S.' 'v;; j CHAPTER, ,4 i " REPTILES AND VERMIN." A REPTILE is not, perhaps, an amiable thing. Its name "that which creeps" prejudices some of us against it. Nor is there anything thoroughly unjustifiable in this. The necessities of speech require a word that shall compendi- ously express the idea of the contemptible and crawling, and at the same time the potentially hurtful. And " reptile " fulfils this obnoxious duty. So when Beattie applies this term of reproach to a servile poet, " the reptile muse, Swoln from the sty, and rankling from the stews," or Byron to a mean critic, they are not to be found fault with. The sycophant in Shelley, the slave in Montgomery, even man " the poor reptile man and heir of woe " himself in loftily- moralising Greene, are metaphorically rendered, and not unfairly, by a term that zoologically implies either a turtle, a crocodile, a frog, a lizard, or a snake. Southey brings some priests under the same category, and scattered up and down in verse will be found scores of individuals whom the A 4 The Poets and Nature. poets, anxious to stigmatise as despicably base, denominate "reptiles." Now all this is perfectly fair. We have attached to a certain word a certain metaphorical meaning, which is a very odious one. Bismarck called the Secret Service Vote " the Reptile Fund," and the Man of Iron includes in it all such miserable creatures as venal editors and spies. The self-seeking parasite, the insidious hypocrite, the cringing slave, deserve the worst we can say of them, and as we have decided that there is nothing worse to be said of such than " reptile "reptiles let them be. But here we must stop. Even the prerogatives of human being's" ji % *4io. eXetiCt futfher. They cannot outrage the sacred Jaws' of Justice isven in the case of reptiles. So we h^veC UQ:rjgfct*whtiJefrer:tQ%ri>a < k.e the name of a particular fbiipg jnca/ijvtfljat \l i5p < ^. < 5rda:,^hd then to transfer the arbi- trary character which we have affixed to it back to the thing whose name we borrowed. We have absolutely no right whatever to begin by saying that sycophants, hypocrites, slaves, and assassins are "reptiles," and then to say that reptiles are sycophants, hypocrites, slaves, and assassins. Merely as a logical syllogism it is absurd and untenable. Here are the two premisses : Despicable men are reptiles ; Reptiles are either turtles, crocodiles, lizards, frogs, or snakes. Work as you will with them, your conclusion must either be that no conclusion is possible, or else an absurd statement to the effect that a frog is a despicable man, or that sycophants, &c., are either turtles, crocodiles, &c. But, setting logic aside, I contend that it is infinitely unjust to speak ill of an immense number of creatures, nearly all of which are either beautiful, directly useful to man, or harmless, simply because, in our usual high-handed way of dealing with the helpless, we have borrowed their collective names as figures of speech. Yet this is what most poets habitually do. Their toads are loathsome and "Reptiles:' 5 their frogs obscene. Their chameleons are turncoats, and their scorpions traitors. Their snakes are utterly abominable. Now I fail to see any justification for this. It strikes me as thoroughly immoral. Even snakes, against which human prejudice cites Scriptural authority, are admirable. They are one of the most splendid parables in all nature. Nothing that breathes less deserves the title of reptile meaning by that word a despicable cowardly thing than the creature that stands in Holy Writ itself as the semblance of a power that could defy Heaven and challenge terms with Omni- potence. I would even go further and venture to say that this, the poet's treatment of a large order of creatures, shows a deficiency of sympathy with nature which is not in accord- ance with the poetical tradition. For example, take the following from Montgomery : " Reptiles were quickened into various birth, Loathsome, unsightly, swoln to obscene bulk, Lurk'd the dank toad beneath the infected turf; The slow-worm crawl'd, the light chameleon climb'd And changed his colour as his place he changed ; The nimble lizard ran from bough to bough, Glancing through light, in shadow disappearing ; The scorpion, many-eyed, with sting of fire, Bred there, the legion-fiend of creeping things." But worse than this, as expressing a wider range of unsympathetic prejudice, are such sweeping lines as these of Coleridge : 1 ' What if one reptile sting another reptile ? Where is the crime ? the goodly face of nature Hath one disfeaturing stain the less upon it." The philosophy here is thoroughly bad-hearted and reprehensible. Another poetical liberty which I consider only indiffe- rently justified is to call insects "reptiles." Thus Thomson 6 The Poets and Nature. (as usual " shagged with horrors ") addresses such pretty things as may-flies and butterflies as a "reptile throng," and it is worth noting how with his usual infelicity he speaks of these reptiles as being "winged, and by the light air upborne." ' ' To sunny waters some By fatal instinct fly ; where on the pool They, sportive, wheel; or, sailing down the stream, Are snatch'd immediate by the quick-eyed trout Or darting salmon. Through the greenwood glade Some love to stray ; there lodged, amus'd, and fed In the fresh leaf. Luxurious, others make The meads their choice, and visit every flower, And every latent herb. Some to the house, The fold, and dairy, hungry, bend their flight, Sip round the pail, or taste the curdling cheese ; Oft, inadvertent, from the milky stream They meet their fate ; or, weltering in the bowl, With powerless wings around them wrapt, expire." Wordsworth, again, calls the glow-worm "a very reptile, " which is intolerable, seeing how he uses the word elsewhere. Eliza Cook, after her wont, speaks of cobwebs as " The bright slime that cunning reptiles spread To catch their prey." But her use of the reptile idea is always thoroughly in character with her poetry generally. What can we say, for instance, of such a stanza as this where an unmasked villain is illustrated by a skinned snake : 1 ' Why, why does Heaven bequeath such gifts To fascinate all eyes, that mark With magnet charm, till something lifts The mask, and shows how foully dark The dazzling reptile is within Beneath its painted, shining skin?" But this lady's definition of reptiles is, like most ladies', very vague. They consider the word synonymous with "Reptiles" ^ " vermin," under which title they include all the creatures they most object to, such as rats, mice, spiders, black- beetles, earwigs, and snails. The right of the sex to dislike what they choose is of course indisputable, and in the vary- ing technical definitions of the word "vermin," they have a plausible excuse for ranging far. Thus, the professional "vermin-killer" is a rat-and-mole-catcher. " Som poison, that he might his ratouns quell And eke ther was a polkat in his nawe That, as he sayd, his capons had yslawe : And fayn he wolde him wrekin if he might Of vermin, that destroied hem by night." On the gamekeeper's table of the proscribed are the weasel kind, and many birds, such as the owl, jay, hawk, heron, and hooded crow. On the Continent, beasts of prey, such as wolves and foxes, are so styled. In Australia official enactments call rabbits and wild horses "vermin." In Western America the Red Indian himself goes under the same name. And in the West Indies, according to Montgomery, the man "of colour" ' ' Lives there a reptile baser than the slave ? Loathsome as death, corrupted as the grave, See the dull Creole." Nor do poets of a more robust sort hesitate at similar licence. Man himself, as in Cowper, is "vermin ; " lawyers in Somervile are " the vermin of debate ; " and courtiers in Thomson are " the vermin of state that on our substance feed." Gutter-children have in Mackay the same ill- sounding name : 1 ' Take them away ! Take them away Out of the gutter, the ooze, and slime, Where the little vermin paddle and crawl Till they grow and ripen into crime." Criminals and " parasites " too, and Jesuits and critics are all "vermin." 8 The Poets and Nature. Coming lower down, we find the polecat called vermin by Chaucer, the rat by many, the mole " vermin impotent and blind " by Butler, the woodlouse, spider, housefly, and a number of insects by others. So that "reptile" and " vermin " are virtually interchangeable terms with the poets. Each denotes or connotes the meanest individuals of every class of beings those which the poets individually consider the meanest but in either case they go so far wrong as to borrow a creature's name in order to convey an odious meaning, and then transfer the odium which they arbitrarily and capriciously attach to the word back to the creature. A further curious complication in this high-handed con- fusion of terms is the use of the word " insect." It is em- ployed as synonymous with reptile and vermin. Thus, man generally is an insect, and so too are special classes of men, notably faithless friends, courtiers, all kinds of sycophants and parasites, and pleasure-seekers generally and riches. " The insect tribes of humankind, Each with its busy hum, or gilded wing, Its subtle webwork, or its venom'd sting." Rogers. ' ' All the vast stock of human progeny, Which now, like swarms of insects, crawl Upon the surface of earth's spacious ball, Must quit this hillock of mortality And in its bowels buried lie '' Oldham. "The swarm that in thy noontide beam were born, Gone to salute the rising morn." Gray. ' ' Ye tinsel insects whom a court maintains, That count your beauties only by your stains, Spin all your cobwebs o'er the eye of day ; The Muse's wing shall brush you all away." Pope. "The nameless insects of a court." Thomson,. "Reptiles." 1 The pageant of a day, without one friend To soothe his tortur'd mind ; all, all are fled, For though they bask'd in his meridian ray, The insects vanish as his beams decline." Somerville. "Thick in yon stream of light, a thousand ways, Upward, and downward, thwarting, and convolv'd, The quivering nations sport ; till, tempest- wing' d, Fierce Winter sweeps them from the face of day. Even so luxurious men, unheeding, pass An idle summer life in fortune's shine, A season's glitter ! Thus they flutter on From toy to toy, from vanity to vice ; Till, blown away by Death, Oblivion comes Behind, and strikes them from the book of life." Thomson. Riches like insects when concealed they lie * Wait but for wings and in their season fly. Pope. The snail, butterfly, spider, lizard, and the rest, addressed in some places as reptiles and vermin, are in others apostro- phised as insects. Again, all are described as emanating alike from putrefying vegetable matter in hot weather. "Swampy fens Where putrefaction into life ferments, And breathes destructive myriads. The hoary fen In putrid streams emits the living cloud Of pestilence." Especially, in a dozen poets at least, from the Nile mud : "When thus, the Nile, diffus'd his wat'ry train In streams of plenty o'er the fruitful plain, Unshapen forms, the refuse of the flood Issu'd imperfect from the teeming mud, But the great source and parent of the day, Fashion'd the creature, and inform'd the clay." Groome. This prolific diluvion, produces indeed, a very large variety of zoological species, from the crocodile to the mosquito. About the hippopotamus I will not be certain. But it is io The Poets and Nature. remarkable how all the poets agree about Nile mud produc- ing misshapen and monstrous forms. Pope is by no means alone in his "half-formed insects on the bank of Nile." But, poetically speaking, " insects " " the mixing myriads of the setting beam " differ from reptiles and vermin in this, that they are pitiably ephemeral. They are "a daily race" ' ' Swarming in the noontide bower, Rise into being and exist an hour." Darwin. They live such a short time that the poets generously excuse them, as " beings of a summer's day." This condescension, I think, is hardly called for. Thomson, for instance, is good enough to say that " the ceaseless hum " in the woods at noon is "not undelightful." He will not say outright that it is delightful, but to show what a large-hearted poet he is, how impressionable to the sounds of wild nature, vows half apologetically that, speaking for himself he will not be answerable for other tastes and does not wish to force his own upon his readers he does really, upon his honour, and all joking apart, find something almost agreeable in the humming of bees in summer woodlands ! What a generous admission ! How such a confession draws the hearts of all lovers of nature to the poet ! But let us hear him again : 1 ' Nor shall the muse disdain To let the little noisy summer race Live in her lay, and flutter through her song." What a beautiful condescension have we here ! How ex- quisitely tender ! He, Thomson do not laugh at him, ladies and gentlemen ; it is his gentle nature makes him do it will positively, and of his own accord, mention in his beautiful poems such vermin as grasshoppers and butterflies. " The muse," forsooth ! "Reptiles" n Or take Cowper's lines in the " Task : " " I would not enter on my list of friends (Though graced with polish'd manners and fine sense, Yet wanting sensibility) the man Who needlessly sets foot upon a worm. An inadvertent step may crush the snail That crawls at evening in the public path ; But he that has humanity, forewarn'd, Will tread aside and let the reptile live. The creeping vermin, loathsome to the sight, And charged perhaps with venom, that intrudes, A visitor unwelcome, into scenes Sacred to neatness and repose, the alcove, The chamber, or refectory, may die : A necessary act incurs no blame. Not so, when held within their proper bounds, And guiltless of offence, they range the air, Or take their pastime in the spacious field : There they are privileged, and he that hunts Or harms them there is guilty of a wrong, Disturbs the economy of Nature's realm, Who, when she formed, designed them an abode." That a man living in the country should be so indifferently informed, and though of a poetical turn of mind so unsym- pathetic, is almost unintelligible. What manner of thing does Cowper mean by " creeping vermin, loathsome to the sight, and charged perhaps with venom " ? The poet means the toad, which " the vulgar " believe to be poisonous. But every gardener knows that it is a most useful little creature, and it is not vermin in any sense of that word. Anyhow, I cannot admire the " sensibility " of the poet who confesses that he approves of killing toads because they come into "the alcove," nor the "humanity" that draws a line between the needful and the needless treading on worms. To kill a toad simply because it comes into a summer- house is stupid cruelty. CHAPTER II. CROCODILES, TURTLES, AND LIZARDS. " THE crocodile, the dragon of the waters, In iron panoply fell as the plague, And merciless as famine, " is obviously a creature that no poet can be expected to admire. And it would perhaps be stretching sentiment too far to expect them to do so. It is not a lovable beast. I have seen them, huge ones, lying on a mud-bank, "like a forest-tree, basking in the sun," as Mary Howitt says, or crawling through reeds, and there was something in the demeanour of the thing that always made me long to kill it. It lay flat, with a sluggish affectation of humility that exasperated me, and be- stirred itself with an air of helplessness that was positively monstrous. A remarkable passage in Montgomery's "Greenland" shows us a broad river " swarming with alligator * shoals " and rolling "clouds of blood." Thomson has a " Behemoth " that, "in plaited mail, rears his head" "glanced from his side, the darted steel in idle shivers flies " and that " crops upon the hills his varied fare." That the former knew what he was writing about is as certain as that the latter did not, yet each is a conundrum. When very young, crocodiles do certainly go "in shoals." I have myself, in the Ganges' overflow, within eyesight from my house in Allahabad, seen them so thick that their * "Alligator,", it should be noted, is in poetry an aggravated crocodile. It is what the scritch-owl is, among birds, to the owl. P. R. Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 1 3 opened jaws they lie with their chins upon the bank and mouths open, perhaps for the same reason that you see vultures sitting facing the breeze with wings widespread looked like a fringe of hurdle stakes, or chevaux de frise. At Dholpur, near Agra, I have also seen them, full grown, in a large company. But these were retainers of the temples. As Bubastis had its cats, and Thebes her ibis, and Memphis her horned divinities, so Dendera had its collared crocodiles : " Clouds of incense woo thy smile, Scaly Monarch of the Nile." The priests put necklaces about their necks, and earrings in their ears, and the people worshipped them, these grim obscurities that crept from out the depths of the river to take their place under Isis' throne. But why was Montgomery's " broad river " red with blood ? The alligator takes his victim down, and there is no sign of the tragedy. A few pink bubbles perhaps but that is all. For Thomson's Behemoth I have no respect. He had very vague or very confused ideas about the crocodile which is " Leviathan " and not Behemoth the rhinoceros, and the hippopotamus. But, whatever it was, his picture is absurd. For crocodiles do not eat grass. The rhinoceros does not live in the water. The hippopotamus is not mailed. Keats, as usual, is true to Nature. His " encased croco- dile " is sufficient, and when he adds a reverence " Son of the old Moon-mountains African Stream of the Pyramid and crocodile, " the conjunction is worthy of the brute "in adamantine scales, That fears no discipline of human hands." How Job militant exults in Leviathan : " Dissect the greatnesse of so vast a Creature, By view of severall parts summe up his feature : Whe shields his scales an plac't, which neither art Knowes how to sunder, nor yet force can part. 1 4 The Poets and Nature. Ne belching rucks forth flames, his moving eye Shines like the glory of the morning skie ; His craggy sinewes are like wreathes of brasse And from his mouth quick flames of fier passe As from an Oven ; the temper of his heart Is like a Nether-Milstone, which no Dart Can pierce, secured from the threatning Speare ; Afraid of none, he strikes the world with feare. The Bow-moms brawny arms send shafts in vaine, They fall like stubble, or bound backe againe : Stones are his pillow, and the Mud his Downe, In earth none greater is, nor equall none, Compar'd with him, all things he doth deride And well may challenge to be King of Pride." Quarks. But why does Thomson describe the great beast as " cased in green scales," or Shelley imagine the species to have been exterminated by the Deluge ? " The jagged alligator, and the might Of earth-convulsing behemoth, which once Were monarch beasts, and on the slimy shores And weed-overgrown continents of earth Increased and multiplied like summer worms On an abandoned corpse, till the blue globe Wrapt deluge round it like a cloke, and they Yelled, gasped, and were abolished." That this reptile, "who can falsely weep," as Heber says, 1 is a hypocrite, who needs telling? The poets are much attracted by this fancy. "With a feigned grief the tomb relents, And like a crocodile its prey laments," says Congreve. In Savage we find it "weeping cruel tears " over its "bleed- ing prey." And in Thomson it is " the smooth crocodile Destruction." Coleridge gives Hypocrisy a "crocodile's eye ; " and Shelley in the " Masque of Anarchy," sees her ride by on its back. Spenser draws from the saurian's " swike " the admir- able moral that it is as well to mind your own affairs while charitably bent on minding those of others : 1 ' ' And the beeste who can falsely weepe Crocodilus was here goode shepe." Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 1 5 ' ' As when a weary traveller, that strays By muddy shore of broad seven-mouthed Nile, Unweeting of the perilous, wand'ring ways, Doth meet a cruel, crafty crocodile, Which, in false grief hiding his harmful guile, Doth weep full sore, and sheddeth tender tears ; The foolish man, that pities all this while His mournful plight, is swallowed up unawares. Forgetful of his own, that minds another's cares." Southey puts into doggerel the legend of there being a king of the crocodiles. A woman has her child eaten up by one of the great river-lizards, and determines to complain to their ruler : " The King of the crocodiles never does wrong, He has no tail so stiff and strong, He has no tail to strike and slay, But he has ears to hear what I say." So she goes, against much advice (like the youth in Excelsior) and eventually finds herself in the presence of the master monster : "The King of the crocodiles there was seen, He sate on the eggs of the crocodile queen, And all around, a numerous rout, The young prince-crocodiles crawled about." And then she appeals to his Majesty in the words quoted above, and having listened to her "You have said well, the King replies, And fixed on her his little eyes ; Good woman, yes, you have said right, But you have not described me quite. I have no tail to strike and slay, And I have ears to hear what you say, I have teeth moreover, as you may see, And I will make a meal of thee," which he promptly does. There is one more point about the " natural history " of the great reptile that is worth noting, namely, the incon- 1 6 The Poets and Nat^lre. gruous friendship of the gruesome beast with the pretty little "zic-zac" plover. Moore has the following : The puny bird that dares with teasing hum Within the crocodile's stretched jaws to come." Young has " Like the bird upon the banks of Nile, That picks the teeth of the dire crocodile." and Spenser this : " Beside the fruitful shore of muddy Nile, Upon a sunny bank outstretched lay In monstrous length a mighty crocodile, That, crammed with guiltless blood, greedy prey Of wretched people travelling that way, Thought all things less than his disdainful pride, Soon came a little bird called tidula, The least of thousands which on earth abide, That forced this hideous beast to open wide The grisly gates of his devouring hell, And let him feed as nature doth provide Upon his jaws that with black venom * swell. Why then should greatest things the least disdain, That so small so mighty can constrain?" It is probably only once in Keats, that crocodiles are an incident of a pretty scene : " Onward the tiger and the leopard pants, With Asian elephants : Onward these myriads with song and dance, With zebras striped and sleek Arabians prance, Web-footed alligators, crocodiles, Bearing upon their scaly backs, in files, Plump infant laughers mimicking the coil Of seamen, and stout galley-rowers' toil : With toying oars and silken sails they glide, Nor care for wind and tide." The "low-roofed" Tortoise meets with but scanty com- pliments from poets. There is an unexpected sympathy, * Query, "vermin." Crocodiles^ Turtles, and Lizards. 1 7 ever, with it in the poetical conceit of the young turtle bom on the dry land longing for the water. "The sad tortoise for the sea doth moan," says Marvell. Another has, " Sighing for the deeps like the turtle." Byron thus notices the contrast : " Here the young turtle, crawling from his shell, Steals to the deep wherein his parents dwell. Chipped by the beam, a nursling of the day, But hatched for ocean by the fostering ray." Montgomery also, after telling how the parent reptile " steals out at eve," explores the shore "with trembling heart," and lays her eggs in the loose warm sand, goes on to describe the escape of the happy youngsters that " by instinct seek the sea : " " Nature herself with her own gentle hand Drops them one by one into the flood, Arid laughs to behold their antic joy When launched in th' element." This is all pleasant reading, for it shows a tender appreci- ation of the creature's natural life, " where, in fleshy mail the tortoise climbs the rocks." More than one poet makes the curious error of thinking that turtles shed their shells, as, for instance, Garth, who has, " There the tortoise hung her coat of mail." As the creature that gives to civic feasts what Southey calls " the fat of verdant hue," so dear to the aldeimanic palate " Gorgonius sits, abdominous and wan, Like a fat squab upon a Chinese fan. He snuffs far off the anticipated joy ; Turtle and venison all his thoughts employ." Cowper. it cannot escape favourable recognition. Says Byron "The turtle-shell which bore, A banquet in the flesh it cover'd o'er ; " and Churchill 1 8 The Poets and Nature. " The turtle of a great and glorious size, Worth its own weight in gold, a mighty prize For which a man of taste all risks would run ; Itself a feast, and ev'ry dish in one." Though a creature to laugh over when we see it creeping stealthily about on tip-toe, as if it were abroad for the pur- pose of picking pockets, it has a very notable place in myth, and was almost universally reverenced. The East believes that the world rests upon a tortoise, which rests upon nothing and what a grand old testacean it is, this Vedic turtle, standing simply on its own dignity, and yet uphold- ing upon its Atlantean carapace all the burdens of the round world, and of them that dwell therein ! Here is a subject for Walt Whitman himself, the self-sufficient, democratic, thewy-and-sinewy, double-sexed, bully-for-you, old tortoise. More power to your shell, sir ! We creeping things take off our hats to you, testudinous ancient. And how splendidly the deliberate thing looms out of Hindoo myth as the hereditary foe of the mystical elephant, the Darkness. The Red Indian to this day says that in the beginning of things there was nothing but a tortoise. It brooded upon space : covered Chaos as with a lid. But after a while it woke up : its solitary existence was irksome to it, and it sank splendidly into the abysmal depths ; and lo ! when it re-emerged, there was the terrestrial globe upon its back ! For something to do, it had fished up our earth from the depths in the protoplasmic fluids, and, rather than be idle, it still keeps on holding it up. But some day it will sink again, and then will come the End with Ragnarok and Armageddon. In Greek and Roman fancies, the tortoise hardly fares so well. It is the form to which a bright nymph, who had jested at the nuptials of Zeus and Herd, was turned into by Mercury ; and ridicule falls upon the greatest of the Greeks when a tortoise falls upon his head. Yet they, too, knew of Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 19 the tradition of the world-supporting thing, and did reverence to it. And so from East to West, from antiquity to to-day, the creature, vast, ponderous, inert, has commanded and commands the homage of men. Nor in poetry do the historic traditions of the creature altogether fail of notice. How ^Eschylus was killed every one knows, but in Spenser we find Thomalin (moralising on good and bad shepherds) localising the event in England, and making the victim of the eagle's mistake "a proud and ambitious pastour," by name Algrind, who lived in his own neighbourhood : " One day he sate upon a hill As now thou wouldst by me ; But I am taught by Algrind' s ill To love the low degree : For sitting so with bared scalp, An eagle soared high, That, weening his white head was chalk, A shell-fish down let fly. She weened the shell-fish to have broke, But therewith bruised his brain ; So now astonied with the stroke, He lies in grievous pain." Henceforth Thomalin refuses ever to go up to the top of a hill, lest an eagle with a tortoise should happen to be overhead. An excellent simile, drawn from a most unpromising source, is Moore's 1 ' Raised the hopes of men as eaglets fly With tortoise aloft into the sky, To dash them down again more shatteringly ! " Of the connection of the tortoise-shell with the first lyre Shelley, among others, takes notable cognisance in his " Hymn to Mercury." The poet sees the child playing about outside the cave and chancing upon a tortoise : " The beast before the portal at his leisure The flowery herbage was depasturing ; Moving his feet in a deliberate measure Over the turf." 2O The Poets and Nature. He cries, " A treasure ! " and, laughing, addresses the animal : " A useful godsend are you to me now King of the dance, companion of the feast, Lovely in all your nature ! Welcome, you Excellent plaything ! Where, sweet mountain beast, Got you that speckled shell ? Thus much I know, You must come home with me, and be my guest ; You will give joy to me, and I will do All that is in my power to honour you. Better to be at home than out of door ; So come with me, and though it has been said That you alive defend from magic power, I know you will sing- sweetly when you're dead. Thus having spoken, the quaint infant bore Lifting it from the grass on which it fed, And grasping it in his delighted hold His treasured prize into the cavern old." Arrived there, he "featly" scoops the shell out, drills holes in it, fastens reeds into them, spreads leather across, fixes the cubits in, " Fitting the bridge to both, and stretched o'er all, Symphonious cords of sheep-gut rhythmical." When he had finished " the lovely instrument," he tried it, and "There went Up from beneath his hand a tumult sweet Of mighty sounds." Montgomery gives the earliest Christian origin of the lyre:- " A shell of tortoise, exquisitely wrought With hieroglyphics of embodied thought ; Jubal himself enchased the polished frame, And Javan won it in the strife for fame ; Among the sons of music, when their sire To his victorious skill adjudged the lyre." The line, " That you alive defend from magic power," is worth a note. The blood of the tortoise was considered by the ancients an antidote to subtle venom. Protected itself by its shield, it became a protector. The Romans bathed Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 2 1 new-born infants in the shells. Its appearance unexpectedly was a very auspicious omen, as being traditionally opposed to the diabolical and mischievous. In England, as a thing of magic, it was part of the stock-in-trade of the alchemist, astrologer, and quack : so, in " Romeo and Juliet " " In his needy shop a tortoise hung." As affording a shield, it has honourable associations referred to by several poets. Thus Rogers' lines, " The warrior's lance Rings on the tortoise with wild dissonance," reminds the reader of the device by which they kept from old Chronos the intelligence of the birth of Zeus, and of the challenge " on the ringing tortoise " of the Knight of Thrace. That the elephant and tortoise should be at perpetual feud, each considering himself the lord of the lake, is one of the funniest myths I know. "Both animals (sun and moon) frequent the banks of the same lake, and have conceived a mortal dislike one for the other, continuing in their brutal forms the quarrel which existed between them when they were not only two men but two brothers. As the elephant and the tortoise both frequent the shores of the same lake, they mutually annoy each other, renewing and maintaining in mythical zoology the strife which subsists between the two mythical brothers who fight each other for the kingdom of heaven, either in the form of twilights, or of equinoxes, or of sun and moon." Yet they meet after all in the " Rape of the Lock " in more friendly rivalry : " The tortoise here and elephant unite, Transformed to combs, the speckled and the white." In poetical metaphor, as in mythology, the tortoise repre- sents the lazy and slow : " I would not be a tortoise in his screen Of stubborn shell, which waves and weather wear not. 'Tis better, on the whole, to have felt and seen That which humanity may bear, or bear not." Byron, 22 The Poets and Nature. But, as Bacon says, " slowness is not sloth." It would be harder work to walk a mile behind a snail than to run one after a hare. But "the tortoise-foot" is an established phrase with the poets when they wish to imply " sluggish.'' " The lazy tortoise," says Faber. Do you remember, in Crabbe, the girl who gets weary of the sleek, overcautious vicar ? "The wondering girl, no prude, but something nice, At length was chill'd by his unmelting ice ; She found her tortoise held such sluggish pace That she must turn and meet him in the chase ; This not approving, she withdrew till one Came who appear'd with livelier hope to run." In heraldry we find the Medici with the impress of a tortoise "under full sail," with the motto festina lente. The conceit, though not original, is excellent, and may be classed with the dolphin (emblem of celerity) and anchor of Ves- pasian, the fish and chameleon of Pope Paul, or the crab and butterfly of the Emperor Augustus. A wonderful family is that of the lizards the ancestors of the birds, and the sliding link between the snake and crocodile. Was there ever palimpsest or papyrus so fa^ci- nating, so engrossing, so important, or so accurately authentic, as that stone from Saxony on which the archseopteryx has left the complete record of itself stamped on the soft slab? It is nothing less than its whole body. Could any chronicle be more simple, unequivocal, satisfying ? How ingenuously it appeals to our confidence. No room is left for disputing its facts or cavilling at its arguments. There it lies as flat as the pressure of some millions of tons of overlying rock could make a thing, a shadow in thickness. Yet that little skeleton speaks with a logic that is most masterful, com- manding, and unanswerable. It is the thing itself, crying Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 23 out to us from the dim past a phantom from the Genesis. Its speech is silence, and yet august in dumbness, its voice is more than trumpets; the walled-in cities of old super- stition, the sacred citadels of ignorance, topple into ruins before it. It is a word straight from the Demiurge himself, whispered to us through the rock galleries that stretch back from Now to Then a single word spoken from the " In the beginning " a worshipful thing. I never go to the British Museum without passing the model of this archaeopteryx, the first of the birds. The lizard-fowl is a perpetual reverence to me. Yet again, contemplate the way in which these creatures gradually shorten their legs as skinks, lose them altogether as amphisbsenas, hesitate for a while as blindworms, and then become actual snakes ophidian, viperine, terrible ! They commence with the pretty agile little things of our English sandy heaths, that are the " beasts-of-prey " to the tiny fly-folk who range among the grass as among forests, and find their lakes in dewdrops,' their pleasure-parks on plaintain leaves. To them succeed the amphibious lizards of the New World, who feed on small snakes, mice, and birds larger creatures, a yard in length, splendidly painted with yellow on a black ground. So to the water-lizards of the Old World, the crocodile-like "monitors," which so tradition used to fancy whistled a note of warning to Leviathan when danger threatened, albeit it eats the croco- dile's eggs, and the young ones too. In revenge, the old crocodiles eat it. Next is that wondrous family of the " short-tongued " lizards, the arboreal iguanas, contrasting notably in their fearsome appearance with the floral loveli- ness of their tropical woodland haunts. Here, too, is the basilisk the " dragon " of the Middle Ages in miniature heraldic, grotesquely heterodox ; and the sea-lizard, a dread- ful-looking thing that feeds upon the sea-weeds a mile from 2 _j. The Poets and Natiire. the coast ; and the flying lizards, beauteous beyond descrip- tion, that slide through the air from tree to tree on their wing-like parachutes ; and, most curious perhaps of all, the frilled lizard, which, if it were only the size of a camel, might have frightened all the Seven Champions out of their wits. And what can be said too enthusiastic for such a thing as the Moloch, a mass of spines and prickles, with forty horns on the tip of its nose, and ferociously thorned to the tip of its tail ? or the geckos, the familiar but wondrous creatures that sleep all through a summer's day upon the ceiling and never drop off, but if they are startled drop their tails ? or the chameleon, that has such a trans- parent skin that its emotions can be read through it ? Human beings have been known to " blush crimson " or turn "deathly pale." The choleric man turns vicious red when out of temper, the Asiatic green when terrified. But the chameleon beats us all. It has no expression whatever on its face, so it makes up for it on its body. You can tell what it is thinking about by the colour of its body. How the poets delighted in the creature \ " As the chameleon, who is known To have no colours of his own , But borrows from his neighbour's hue His white or black, his green or blue, And struts as much in ready light, Which credit gives him upon sight, As if the rainbow were in tail Settled on him and his heirs male." Prior. Allan Ramsay adapts an old fable excellently in his poem on the beast. One man swears it is blue. He saw it that very morning, and so cannot be wrong. Another had seen it that evening, only an hour ago, and he will stake his life on it, it was green. From argument it comes to quarrelling, and "frae words there had been cuff and kick," but a third man happens to come along. He asks the reason for such high words between neighbours, and they tell him. At Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 25 this he laughs immoderately, calls them both fools, and says the chameleon is black, and he knows it why? because he has got it in his pocket at that very moment- And he whips the creature out " But to surprise them ane and a' The animal was white as snaw ! " Shelley too has an exhortation admirably characteristic : " Chameleons feed on light and air ; Poets' food is love and fame. If in this wide world of care Poets could but find the same With as little toil as they, Would they ever change their hue As the light chameleons do, Suiting it to every ray Twenty times a day ? Poets are on this cold earth As chameleons might be, Hidden from their early birth In a cave beneath the sea. Where light is chameleons change ; Where love is not poets do. Fame is love disguised : if few Find either, never think it strange That poets range. Yet dare not stain with wealth or power A poet's free and heavenly mind. If bright chameleons should devour Any food but beams and wind, They would grow as earthly soon As their brother lizards are. Children of a summer star, Spirits from beyond the moon, Ah ! refuse the boon ! " But in its natural aspect the poets knew little of it. They pretended to believe it "fed" upon air : " Stretch'd at its ease, the beast I view'd, And saw it eat the air for food." Her rick. 26 The Poets and Nature. "On that hope, I build my happiness, I live upon it, Like the chameleon, on its proper food, The unsubstantial air." Hurdis. " Bards are not chameleons quite, And heavenly food is very light." Montgomery. No living thing, whate'er its food, feasts there, But the chameleon who can feast on air." Churchill. " While I, condemned to thinnest fare, Like those I flatter live on air." Gay. "Cold" is Sir William Jones's epithet borrowed, of course, from the general lizard idea, that these creatures are gelid " E'en cold chameleons pant in thickets dun, And o'er the burning grit the unwinged locusts run." It was thus that the salamander got a reputation for disre- garding flames, or even putting them out, by the extreme "coldness" of its body. It is therefore in metaphor that this strange lizard is most conspicuous. The gay gallant in Moore " Pranked in gay vest, to which the flame Of every lamp he passed, or blue, Or green, or crimson, lent its hue ; As though a live chameleon's skin He had despoiled to robe him in." the turncoat politician in Churchill " A creature of the right cameleon hue, Wears any colours, yellow or true blue." In Cowley Fancy, in Savage Fortune, has the same steeds " Wild dame with much lascivious pride By twin chameleons drawn does gaily ride." Advisers are chameleons in Dryden "To change the dye, with every distant view." Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 27 Love in Shakespeare ; courtiers in Gay ; Italians in Rogers ; the sea in Campbell : " Mighty sea ! chameleon-like thou changest." lovers in Shelley : 1 ' As a lover or a chameleon Grows like what it lives upon ; " cowards in Byron " Took, like chameleons, some slight tinge of fear ; " and women "your true chameleons" in Pope, "who change colour according to the humour and disposition of the men who approach them ; " the weak-minded man in Pryor : " As the chameleon who is known To have no colour but his own, But borrows from his neighbour's hue, His white or black, his green or blue ; And struts as much in ready light Which credit gives him upon sight." Prior. " Ah ! simple youth ! how oft will he Of thy chang'd faith complain ! And his own fortunes find to be So airy and so vain, Of so cameleon-like an hue, That still their colour changes with it too ! " Cowley. " Through a thousand shades His spirit flits, chameleon-like, and mocks The eye of the observer." Rogers. That they thrive on a diet of air is a point that is obvi- ously suggestive : " Speed. Why muse you, sir? 'Tis dinner-time. Valentine. I have dined. Speed. Ay, but hearken, sir ; though the chameleon Love can feed on the air, I am one that am nourished by my victuals, and would fain have meat." 28 The Poets and Nature. And so in Hamlet : " King. How fares our cousin ? Hamlet. Excellent, i' faith of the chameleon's diet : I eat the air, promise-crammed. " Once upon a time, says a Hindoo legend, there was a certain king who had before him a case in which two Brahmans disputed the possession of a cow and calf, and he was so dilatory in judgment that the pious litigants appealed to Heaven, the result, as far as the king was concerned, being that he was turned into a chameleon, which never seems to know its own mind for an hour to- gether. Poets see lizards in two aspects either as things of happiest, brightest sunshine, or of ominous and sepulchral gloom. Those, as Byron, Shelley, Rogers, Montgomery, or Faber, who had seen and therefore admired these pretty, elegant, harmless creatures, speak of them with kindly admiration. They hear "the quick-eyed lizard rustling through the grass," or note " the shrill chirp of the green lizard's love," see " the lively lizard playing in the chinks," and watch it basking in the grooves of the fallen pillar " With sensual enjoyment of the heat, And with a little pulse that would outstep The notes of nightingales for speed." On the other hand, they are creatures of ruins and dismal abodes " Bit by bit the ruin crumbles, Not a lizard there abiding ; And the callow raven tumbles From the loophole of her hiding." " The painted lizard and the bird of prey " are associates in Dryden (borrowing from Virgil) ; in Cunninghame we have "the lizard and the lazy, lurking bat, Inhabiting the Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 29 painted room." These are poets of the non-natural-history category, and supreme amongst them are the Eliza Cooks of verse. As, for instance, " Bat and lizard had allied, With mole and owlet by their side;" or "The dark retreat of lizard, frog, and speckled snake;" or "The gloomy owl and speckled lizard." Shelley is especially fond of the lizard simile, and having in Greece and Italy had these beautiful creatures constantly under his eye, uses them in his verse with exquisite felicity, although at times with a "large license." Notable is the fidelity of his attaching the idea of " light " to the sudden- flashing thing. It is "sparkling" "glittering" "and the green lizard and the golden snake, Like unimprisoned flames out of their trance awake." Now, whimsical though it may seem, I should like to draw passing attention to the curious community of epithet which all these creatures enjoy. We have " speckled " lizard with the owl, and the lizard with the "speckled snake," and the latter with the owl. There is the " painted " lizard and the owl, also " the painted snake and the owl." Then we read of " gay lizards glittering," and "serpents glittering, with gay hues adorned." The "green gilded snake " glides on the tomb, and the "green lizard and gilded newt " do the same on a ruin. A third has "a green gilded lizard." I could go on to tedious length, but my object in this brief paragraph is only to suggest that poets are immoral in lumping diverse creatures together in order to convey a particular impression. The mid-day lizard and the nocturnal owl are of course as absurd in association as the land lizard and the water newt. Allan Ramsay has a poem on " Twa Lizards," which is zoologically interesting, though the moral is dull enough after Spenser. Of two lizards basking on a bank, one regrets their mean estate, and cites the existence of crocodiles on the Nile, which are worshipped in " pagods," 30 The Poets and Nature. as an example of what his ambition aspires to. Those were lizards worth calling such or he would even like to be a deer, with fine horns. Of course a deer is run down before his eyes, and the lizard repents his aspirings after an exalted station. " It is better," says Herbert, " to be the head of a lizard than the tail of a lion." As one of the heralds of Spring, the "lizard of St. Agnes " is a popular favourite in Southern Europe. In Italy it is also called "guarda uomo," man's protector. In Sicily it stands in equal favour, and San Giuvanni, as it is called, must not be killed, "because it is in the presence of the Lord in heaven, and lights the little lamps before the Lord." But if by accident you should do one to death, you must touch the still quivering limbs and say : " Not I, not I, did murder you, Little dog of holy St. Matthew." The children carry them about as pets in their bosoms, and when they let them go, ask them to intercede before " the Lord " for them. The common green lizard is especially protected, as superstition invests it with power against evil talismans and enchantments, and against venomous snakes. Thus the crest of the Mantuan princes was a lizard in a tuft of camomile, Pliny saying that these creatures, when they have fought with serpents and been bitten, cure themselves with that herb. It is unlucky, so English folk-lore avers, for a wedding- party to see a lizard ; and that the creature has a painful sting says Suffolk, " as smart as lizards' stings ; " and again, Queen Margaret, "lizards' dreadful stings" is still an article of superstitious belief among the more ignorant. The Arabs eat the legless desert lizards, calling them " sand-fishes," so as not to seem to transgress commandment; for the creatures are unclean, one species indeed being specially anathema, for Mahomet has ordered his people Crocodiles, Turtles, and Lizards. 31 to stone them wherever found, as they hang their necks in mockery of the Moslem's attitude of prayer. To this day, therefore, the faithful persecute them rigorously as scoffing unbelievers. " Fadladeen, besides the spiritual comfort he derived from a pilgrimage to the tomb of the saints from whom the valley is named, had opportunities of gratifying, in a small way, his taste for victims, by putting to death some hundreds of those unfortunate little lizards, which all pious Mussulmans make it a point to kill ; taking for granted that the manner in which the creature hangs its head is meant as a mimicry of the attitude in which the faithful say their prayers ! " None the less they were considered, and indeed are still, very important in Eastern medicine, the traditional coldness of the creatures recommending them to the Pharmacopoeia of Fancy as being supposed to be beneficial in all ailments arising from excessive heat, although so diverse as burns, sunstroke, sand-blindness, and scarlet fever. Newts, the pretty " eft " of our ponds, receive the most infamous treatment from poets. Wordsworth calls them " offensive," Eliza Cook miasmatic : " Mist and chill are over the hill, The crops on the upland are green and stark, Newts are about and the rain puts out The tender light of the glow-worm's spark." It delights me to quote this fustian. Imagine crops being " stark ! " and then that line, " newts are about!" But Spenser calls them " fearefull eftes," Garth " hateful," and Shelley " poisonous." Shakespeare's witches mix the eyes of newts with the toes of frogs in their dreadful broth. " Onely these marishes and myrie bogs, In which the fearefull ewftes do build their bowres, Yeeld me an hostry mongst the croking frogs." Spenser. " And from a stone beside a poisonous eft Peeps idly." Shelley, 3 2 The Poets and Nature. " Down to those cells obscener reptiles creep, Where hateful newts and painted-lizards sleep, And shiv'ring snakes the summer solstice wait." Garth. And here out of sheer malice, I will quote Wordsworth, whose errors of natural history and lack of sympathy with nature are as deplorable as inexplicable in a rural poet : " How disappeared he? ask the newt and toad, Inheritors of his abode ; The otter crouching undisturbed, In her dank cleft ; but be thou curbed, O froward fancy ! 'mid a scene Of aspect winning and serene ; For those offensive creatures shun The inquisition of the sun ! " Why is the newt, a charming ornament of the waters it frequents, " offensive ; " and why does it shun the sunlight any more than trout or salmon do ? Again : "The tapers shall be quenched, the belfries mute, And 'mid their choirs unroofed by selfish rage, The warbling wren shall find a leafy cage The gadding bramble hang her purple fruit ; And the green lizard and the gilded newt Lead unmolested lives, and die of age." Why "gilded" newt? The scarlet fringe of its tail is sufficiently conspicuous, and worth noting, but why gilded ? Why not electro-plated ? CHAPTER III. SNAKES IN NATURE. IN all the range of poetry there is no object of nature, outside humanity, which has engaged fancy more constantly or in so many diverse moods as the serpent. It was invested in Holy Writ with a most portentous individuality; has been reverenced at one time or another with divine honours by almost every race upon the earth, and coils inextricably round the legends of nearly every language. It was endowed in classical literature with all conceivable attributes, malig- nant and benign, and honoured through successive ages with such persistent superstition as to constitute it almost the cen- tral figure of folk-myth. Is it then to be wondered at that the poetic mind should be attracted by a creature which has fascinated mankind from the earliest times, and which still maintains its rank as the chiefest of Nature's parables ? The serpent, however, has a prodigious literature of its own, and into this I have here no intention to make rash expedition. My concern is specifically with "Snakes in Poetry," and even when thus restricted, the subject is suffi- ciently large and many-sided, "rolling in orbs immense its length of coils," to make me prefer to take it in three sections. The first of these is the reptile " in nature." Now, very few of our British poets knew personally any- thing at all of the snake in nature, and this absence of in- formation compelled them to go for the facts they wanted to Holy Writ, classical myths, or popular superstitions. More- 33 C 34 Tlie Poet* and Nature. over, in the matter of natural history they follow each other with remarkable fidelity, and nearly all the errors of later poets are to be traced, by the actual language used, back to the elder. The serpent, therefore, continues to be "deceit- ful," and the adder "deaf," and snakes generally are said to be " slimy," to leap upon their victims, to wound with their tongues, or sting with their tails. Like them there is nothing for fatal and determined malignity : it is death to enrage them. Yet, how very different are the facts. Even in my own casual acquaintance with venomous species I have learnt indeed, the first experience was enough to teach me what poor, helpless, timid, destructible creatures they are. When living on the shore of the Great Salt Lake in Utah, I used to go hunting for rattlesnakes with a forked stick. The suicidal creatures give you but small trouble in " hunt- ing," for as soon as you come near them they spring their alarum. "Here I am," the reptile calls out So, guided by the sound, you discover under a tuft of sage-brush the object of your quest, and in spite of "The rattling terrors of the vengeful snake," you proceed to fix it with the fork, and then with the heel of the boot or a stone to kill it, cutting off its rattles as a trophy. The diversion at first even suggested cruelty to me : for the snake had no chance whatever, and made no effort worth calling such to escape. But this foreshore was the favourite summer bathing-resort of the residents of Salt Lake City, and as the children wandered about in all direc- tions picking flowers, the danger to life was so considerable (as had been disastrously proved), that the killing of rattle- snakes became as much a public service as the destruction of other venomous species undertaken, for instance, by the Government of India is considered elsewhere. But when I hear any one speak of the terrors of the rattlesnake, I know they have never gone hunting them. Snakes in Nature. 35 To give one more personal reminiscence. I was at one time a professor at the Agra College, and, sitting in my chair one hot-weather morning, was holding forth with some- thing more than my usual earnestness to the small class before me. The subject was some problem in metaphysics, the students were undergraduates reading for honours, and examinations were close at hand. It was necessary we should all be very diligent. My annoyance was very consider- able, therefore, when I saw that the half-dozen young fellows some of them were Brahmans persisted in looking over my shoulder instead of at me. At last I looked round to see what it was that distracted their attention, and found, to my surprise, that a passing cobra, attracted probably by the droning of my voice, had come into the lecture-room, and was enjoying itself in a corner. These creatures, as every one knows, are peculiarly susceptible to anything like cadence in sound, and it is very likely that the monotonous rise and fall of a single voice had taken its fancy, just as modulation of notes, without any air, upon any musical instrument will do. At any rate there was the cobra, and as fine a speciman as I ever met with, with its hood inflated to the full, its spec- tacles brilliantly white, and the sunlight striking in through the doorway across its burnished body. There is something singularly imposing in the attitude of this snake when excited. My visitor in the present case had raised itself as high as it could, something less than a foot, and was swaying from side to side in accurate rhythm, as if in a trance ; and in the uplift of the head, the proud drawing-back of the neck, there was a positive majesty of bearing hardly conceivable in a poor worm some four feet long. Now, a Portuguese author, writing of India, says : "The sudden appearance of a cobra-da-capello in a room is considered to presage some future good or evil. It is the Divinity himself in this form, or at least his messenger, and the bringer of rewards or chastisement. Although it is exceedingly venomous, it is neither killed nor 36 The Poets and Nature. molested in the house which it enters, but respected, and even caressed." Far different was the fate of the cobra that intruded upon my lecture-room. For I got up, and, keeping my ruler in my hand, went towards the snake. Turning to my class, I said, " It is a very sacred animal, I know but not in a lecture-room." And therewith, while the poor crea- ture was still continuing its sing-song oscillation, I knocked it over with a smart tap on the head from my ebony sceptre. " Besides," I continued, " the Government has placed a reward of fourpence-halfpenny on its head," and I took up my white sun-umbrella, which was leaning against the wall, and, putting the point of it under the writhing thing, jerked it clear out through the doorway into the sunlight. And before I got back to my chair there was a rush of wings to the doorway, and the next instant a couple of kites were carrying the cobra away in halves into two separate parishes. So it will be understood that I have not for the natural serpent any superstitious reverence. On the other hand, it may be objected that I am not a fit person to undertake the criticism of poets on a subject so full of suggestive fancies. In self-defence, therefore, I venture to say that I have written much upon this fascinating subject, and not altogether, I hope, without sympathy with the beautiful myths of antiquity and the engaging credulities of more modern ignorance ; and to escape, therefore, the charge of not recognising the aspects from which poets survey the reptile world, I will repeat here a paragraph from a paper which I once took the liberty of putting into Mr. Ruskin's mouth as a lecture on snakes. " Without a horizon on any side of him, the speaker could hold high revel among a multitude of delightful phantasies, and make holiday with all the beasts of fable. Ranging from Greek to Saxon, and from Latin to Norman, Mr. Ruskin could traverse all the cloudlands of myth and the solid fields of history, lighting the way as he went with feli- citous glimpses of a wise fancy, and bringing up in quaint Snakes in Nature. 37 disorder, and yet in order too, all the grotesque things that heraldry owns, and the old world in days past knew so much of; the wyvern, with its vicious cast of countenance, but inadequate stomach ; the spiny and always rampant dragon- kind ; the hydra, unhappy beast that must have suffered from such a multitudinous toothache ; the crowned basilisk, king of the reptiles and chiefest of vermin ; the gorgon, with snakes for hair ; and the terrible echidna ; the cockatrice, fell worm, whose first glance was petrifaction, and whose second death ; the salamander, of such subtle sort that he digested flame ; the chimaera, shapeless, yet deadly ; the dread cer- astes ; the aspic, " pretty worm of Nilus," fatal as lightning and as swift ; and the dypsas, whose portentous aspect sufficed to hold the path against an army of Rome's choicest legion. From astronomy, where Serpentarius, baleful constellation, glitters, and Draco refulgent rears his impossible head, the speaker could run through all the forms of dragon idealism, recalling to his audience, as he went on his way, beset with " unspeakable " monsters, the poems of the Greek and of yet older mythologies, churning up the old waters with a Shesh of his own, and summoning into sight at the sound of his pipe all the music-loving reptiles of mythology, like one of the old Psylli or the Marmarids, or one of the Magi, sons of Chus, * tame, at whose voices, spellbound, the dread cerastes lay/ " The snakes of antiquity, it is true, have come down to us dignified, and made terrible by the honours and fears of past ages, when the Egyptians and the Greeks bound the aspic round the head of the idol as the most regal of tiaras, and crowned in fancy the adder and the asp ; when nations tenanted their sacred groves with even more sacred serpents : entrusted to their care all that kings held most precious, and the gems which the jealous earth still held undug ; deifying some of their worms, and giving the names of others to their gods. But the actual facts known to science of modern snakes, the deadlier sort of the ophidians, invest 38 The Poets and Nature. them with terrors equal to any creature of fable, and with the superstitious, might entitle them to divide honours with the past objects of Ammonian worship and be the central figures in the rites of Thermuthis or of Ops." Very few specific varieties of the ophidian class find notice in verse. Apostrophising the Red Man whom Mrs. Hemans, by the way, calls " a snake" Eliza Cook bids him go and consort with " the whipsnake and the jaguar," a task which is as cruelly severe as any ever set by the wicked stepmothers of the fairy tales, for, to consort simultaneously with both whipsnake and jaguar would necessitate the Red Man's being in two places at once, seeing that those creatures inhabit different continents. The " rattlesnake "the " Indian's rattlesnake" of Butler- meets with frequent reference. Byron has these mysterious lines : " Sprung from a race whose rising blood, When stirred beyond its calmer mood And trodden hard upon, is like The rattlesnake's in act to strike." " Like a live arrow leapt the rattlesnake," says Mont- gomery; but Goldsmith's line, "The rattling terrors of the vengeful snake," is perhaps the best, though Butler is certainly more truthful to nature when he says " One that idly rails and threats, And all the mischief that he meant Does, like a rattlesnake, prevent." For this snake's alarum is, I think, from the personal experi- ences of the reptile already narrated, a merciful provision for the security of man and beast, rather than any additional circumstance of malignity in the reptile. But for that warn- ing sound I should myself have often come very near to treading on them, and on one occasion actually touching one with my hand ; but the smallest alarm makes the hidden thing declare itself. The noisy gift, in fact, is fatal to the snake, and the salvation of everything else. Snakes in Nature. 39 Following up her "whipsnake and jaguar" with another impossible association, Eliza Cook has "the boa and the vulture" consorting together for the Red Man's ruin. The boa-constrictor is often alluded to, but mentioned by name only once again, unless I am mistaken, and then by Byron in Don Juan : " Not that he was not sometimes rash or so, But never in his real and serious mood ; Then calm, concentrated, and still, and slow, He lay coil'd like the boa in the wood : With him it never was a word a blow ; His angry word once o'er, he shed no blood ; But in his silence there was much to rue, And his one blow left little work for two." Asps, of course, have filled, ever since " the pretty worm of Nilus" hidden in fig-leaves was carried up by country clowns (momentous burden) into the palace of Cleopatra herself Mark Antony's " serpent of old Nile " a large space in serpent-lore. But they are not found often in English verse. In his " Camel-driver," Collins appropriately places it (the " parch'd adder " of Akenside) in Arabian deserts : "At that dread hour the silent asp shall creep, If aught of rest I find, upon my sleep." And perhaps in the next couplet he refers to the asp's natural companion in the sandy wilderness, the puff-adder : "Or some swol'n serpent twist his scales around And wake to anguish with a burning wound." That this little worm lets itself be eaten by cranes in order to feed at its ease upon the bird's entrails 1 is a curious fiction more than once alluded to in metaphor, and now and again the word "asp" occurs as a generic name for venomous snakes rather than of any specific viper. The "desert serpent" of Campbell that dwells in "desolation cold," 1 " As through the crane's trunk throat doth speed, The asp who doth on his feeder feed." Lovelace. 4O The Poets and Nature. might be the asp or "horned cerastes dire" if the poet had not naturalised it in America. But Campbell is at all times delightfully incorrect in his natural history. King's " horned serpents " that Megaera wears, are perhaps the cerastes ; but Moore, misunderstanding the name of another species, makes an amusingly characteristic error as to its meaning. He says : " The smooth glass-snake, gliding o'er my way, Shows the dim moonlight through his scaly form " evidently thinking the reptile got its name from being trans- parent. But it is as opaque as any other worm, and owes the prefix to its exceeding brittleness. Moreover, the " glass- snakes " are hardly snakes at all, but only snake-like lizards. Sir William Jones has an Indian "serpent dire," "of size minute, with necklace brown and freckled side," which is perhaps the Daboia elegans. More uncertain is the "blue serpent" with which, in the satire of Rufinus, the Fury "girds her waist around," after binding her hair with an adamant?- The water-snake, it might have been thought, would have been a very attractive image to poets, but such is not the case. It is but seldom met with, and even on those infre- quent occasions without any attempt to take advantage of so masterly a touch of nature. Moore's fancy imagines many a " water-snake " slumbering in Lake Erie : " Basking in the web of leaves Which the water-lily weaves." But it is only in Shelley, the poet of the snake, that this serpent meets with competent recognition. Thus : "The snake, The pale snake that, with eager breath, Creeps here his noontide thirst to slake, 1 The Fury, having performed these feats of the toilette, proceeds to Phlegethon, " whose pitchy waves are flakes of rolling flame ! " Snakes in Nature. 41 Is beaming with many a mingled hue Shed from yon dome's eternal blue When he floats on that dark and lucid flood In the light of his own loveliness." What " the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear : Which will not hearken to the voice of charmers, charming never so wisely," may have been in ancient Palestine, it is now scarcely possible to say ; but in the old version of Holy Writ the translators rendered the original word sometimes as " adder," sometimes as " cockatrice " a fearful reptile, which in the days of King James was thoroughly believed in. But our poets, knowing that one of the English snakes is so called, transferred to it the epithet of " deaf " regardless of the fact that the creature is really very quick of hearing. " Fierce" is another epithet sometimes coupled with it " as the adder deaf and fierce ; " " fierce as the adder and as deaf." Pope has " fierce as a startled adder," and our English reptile, though a timid thing, will, it is true, turn, but impotently, at bay if pursued and teased. With regard to these two Biblical points, the "ferocity" and the deafness of the adder, the following passages from Wood's " Bible Animals " are worth quoting. Speaking of the general apathy of snakes, he says "The late Mr. Waterton, for example, would take up a rattlesnake in his bare hand without feeling the least uneasy as to the behaviour of his prisoner. "He once took twenty-seven rattlesnakes out of a box, carried them into another room, put them into a large glass case, and afterwards replaced them in the box." Coming then to the English adder, Mr. Wood gives the following personal reminiscence : "As a rule, a great amount of provocation is needed before a venomous serpent will use its teeth. " One of my friends, when a boy, caught a viper, mistaking it for a common snake. He tied it round his neck, coiled 42 The Poets and Natiire. it on his wrist by way of a bracelet, and so took it home, playing many similar tricks with it as he went. After arrival in the house, he produced the viper for the amusement of his brothers and sisters, and, after repeating his per- formances, tried to tie the snake in a double knot. This, however, was enough to provoke the most pacific of creatures, and in consequence he received a bite on his finger." Respecting its deafness the same writer gives the following delightful quotation from a "Sermon for the eleventh day after Pentecost," by " Luis of Granada : " " Their fury is after the likeness of the serpent, as the asp which even stoppeth her ears which heedeth not the voice of the charmers, even of the wizard which charmeth wisely. " For they say commonly, the asp, while she is charmed, so that she poisoneth not men with her deadly venom, layest one of her ears to the ground and stoppeth the other by thereunto putting her tail, that so the strength of the poison which lurketh within may abide without." To this the author adds the remark " It may be as well to remark, before passing to another of the serpents, that snakes have no external ears, and that therefore the notion of the serpent stopping its ears is zoologically a simple absurdity." Viper is poetically, as also in popular language, a synonym of adder, and the name is given as a rule to all snakes that are of the smaller size but greater venom. To the larger, the name " serpent " is appropriated. To illustrate this from Thomson : " Lo ! the green serpent, from his dark abode, Which e'en Imagination fears to tread, At noon forth issuing, gathers up his train In orbs immense, then, darting out anew, Seeks the refreshing fount ; by which diffused, He throws his folds ; and while, with threatening tongue Snakes in Nature. 43 And deathful jaws erect, the monster curls His flaming crest, all other thirst, appalled, Or shivering flies, or checked at distance stands, Nor dares approach." This is the serpent, the reptile of the largest size. Then the passage continues thus : " But still more direful he, The small close-lurking minister of fate, Whose high concocted venom through the veins A rapid lightning darts, arresting swift The vital current. Formed to humble man, This child of vengeful Nature." Here we have the two poetic genera in juxtaposition, the one terrific, bulky, crested, that awes all the wild things of the tropics by its furious aspect, and its acknowledged strength; the other insignificant in size, but "lightning" in its deadliness. Nor are these passages without interest as illustrating several very prevalent errors prevalent, not only among poets about this most wondrous order of creatures. They may indeed be called the " normal " errors of the poets. __One of these is the idea that snakes Titania's " spotted snakes with double tongues" wound with their tongues. Shakspeare has both " tooth " and " sting," and was evidently in doubt on the point. Thomson, we have seen, has " threatening tongue " because, perhaps, Somerville (whom he had read assiduously and to much useful purpose) has the same expression : 1 ' So when the unwary clown with hasty step Crushes the folded snake, her wounded parts, Grov'lling, she trails along, but her high crest Erect she bears, in all its speckled pride She swells, inflamed, and with her forky tongue Threatens destruction." Scott compromises with his doubts : " Thus, circled in his coil, the snake, When roving hunters beat the brake, 44 The Poets and Nature. Watches with red and glistening eye, Prepared, if heedless steps draw nigh, ~W\i\\. forked tongue and venomed fang Instant to dart the deadly pang ; But if the intruders turn aside Away his coils unfolded glide, And through the deep savanna wind Some undisturbed retreat, to find." Many other poets are content to be equally ambiguous, while in some there is a suspicion of the further error that the snake "stings." With its tail ? Marvell starts it, so far as I can gather, with " Disarmed of its teeth and sting ; " and after him many follow, as Allan Ramsay in " Th' envenomed tooth or forked sting ; " or Eliza Cook in " Crushing and stinging with venomed fold." Philips continues the fiction with an admirable originality, hardly to be expected from the author of " Cider : " " And as a snake, when first the rosy hours Shed vernal sweets o'er ev'ry vale and mead, Rolls tardy from his cell obscure and dank ; But, when by genial rays of summer sun Purg'd of his slough he nimbler threads the brake, Whetting his sting, his crested head he rears, Terrific from each eye retort he shoots Ensanguin'd rays the distant swains admire His various neck and spires bedropp'd with gold." The idea of " whetting his sting " is as delightful, but not so original as the rest, for in other poets we have the wild- boar and the rhinoceros whetting their tusks under very similar circumstances. Moreover, there is the high prescrip- tion of Holy Writ : " They have sharpened their tongues like a serpent," says the Psalmist. Southey makes thankful use of it in the lines " Wily as the snake That sharps his venomed tooth in every brake." Snakes in Nature. 45 So much for the errors as to what the Americans call " the business ends " of the snake. Another class concerns itself with the creature's appearance. "The vulgar" always call snakes "slimy," and poets do so too. Thus Rogers, who ought to have known better, says : " Everywhere from bush and brake, The musky odour of the serpents came, Their slimy track across the woodman's path Bright in the moonshine." The origin of the error that snakes are slimy, so far as modern poets are concerned, is perhaps Darwin, who more than once speaks of the " foamy folds" of serpents, and as he was a naturalist, his word of course went for much. Among other misconceptions as to the tribe may be noted Pitt's idea, that serpents feed on poison-plants " So the fell snake rejects the fragrant flow'rs But every poison of the field devours ; " and the more common ones that these reptiles stand on end when angry, and that they are most active at noon and asleep by night. Darwin has a remarkable fancy on the reciprocity of alarm : " Stern stalks the lion ; on the rustling brinks Hears the dread snake, and trembles as he drinks, Quick darts the scaly monster o'er the plain, Fold over fold his undulating train ; And bending o'er the lake his crested brow, Starts at the crocodile, that gapes below." What power there is in Spenser's simple lines " Like a snake whom wearie winter's teene Hath worne to nought, now, feeling summer's might, Casts off his ragged skin and freshly doth him dight." All poets are attracted by this idea of rejuvenescence, and the casting of the slough is as regularly recurrent as 46 The Poets and Nature. the deer's "hanging of his old head on the pale." Says Somerville : " Brisk as a snake in merry May That just had cast his slough away." And Montgomery : " The serpent flings his slough away And shines in Orient colours dight, A flexile ray of living light." Whether or not these reptiles exercise a fascinating in- fluence over other creatures is still an undecided point. But antiquity held that they could charm with the eye ; and the bird spellbound by the snake has passed into an accepted metaphor. In verse its occurs abundantly : " It was vain to hold the victim, For he plunged to meet her call, Like the bird that shrieks and flutters In the gazing serpent's thrall." Campbell. " As the snake's magnetic glare Charms the flitting tribes of air, Till the dire enchantment draws Destined victims to his jaws." Montgomery. " Like the bird whose pinions quake, But cannot fly the gazing snake." Byron. " Thou'lt fly? As easily may victims run The gaunt snake hath once fixed eyes upon ; As easily, when caught, the prey may be Plucked from his loving folds as thou from me." Moore. " This cold and creeping kinsman who so long Kept his eye on me, as the snake upon The fluttering bird." Byron. Of their personal beauty the poets draw an almost exaggerated picture. Wondrous as the elegance and adorn- Snakes in Nature. 47 ment of these creatures undoubtedly are, it is almost excessive to speak of their "volumes of scaly gold" and '* thousand mingling colours," when referring to the actual reptile in nature. That Keats should make his Lamia transcendent in splendour, or Shelley his serpents of fancy such miracles of loveliness, is well within their licence ; but when the real creature is under description, poetical rapture often goes beyond the subject. As in Montgomery : " Terribly beautiful, the serpent lay Wreathed like a coronet of gold and jewels Fit for a tyrant brow ; anon he flew, Straight as an arrow shot from his own rings, And struck his victim shrieking, ere it went Down his strained throat, the open sepulchre." Their eyes are not like "live rubies " nor "living emeralds," "The light of such a joy as makes the stare Of hungry snakes like living emeralds glow, Shone in a hundred human eyes." Shelley. but, on the contrary, are most malignantly, venomously, dull, and quite incapable of " flinging out arrows of death." That snakes leap at their victims is one of those popular errors which it seems impossible to destroy. For, as a rule, men and woman lose some of their presence of mind when confronted suddenly and the snake is very sudden in its gestures with one of these reptiles, and, if struck at, always declare that the creature " sprang " at them. But it is a fact that no snake can leave the ground; moreover, that the radius of their stroke is limited in a fixed relation to their length, a four-foot individual, for instance, being only able to wound at say a foot-and-a-half, and so on in proportion to the varying lengths. So that the snake " Who pours his length And hurls at once his venom and his strength " is a poetical fiction, as, for the same reason, is Montgomery's brilliant reptile quoted above. 48 The Poets and Nature. Scott has " Like adder darting from his coil," and Byron, " As darts an angry asp." Sometimes there is a harmless snake, as in Joanna Baillie's "Devotional Song for a Negro Child," where " stingless snakes entwisted lying," are mentioned among the usual features of a tropical noontide a very curious effort of fancy or, as in Waller's address to " A Fair Lady playing with a Snake : " " Thrice happy snake ! that in her sleeve May boldly creep ; we dare not give Our thoughts so unconfined a leave. Contented in that nest of snow He lies, as he his bliss did know, And to the wood no more would go ; " and again, in Broome, in the poem " To a Lady," that com- mences, " It is a pleasing, direful sight, At once you charm us and affright." This more amiable aspect of the reptile is, however, legitimately extended in the " Faery Queen," where we find Cambina's " rod of peace " entwined with two wedded serpents, " with one olive garland crowned." This was probably emblematic of the impending reconcilia- tionof the combatant heroes andtheir simultaneous espousals. For " the rod which Maia's son doth wield, Wherewith the hellish fiends he doth confound," which Spenser himself introduces as resembling that borne by the lovely peace- maker of his poem was also snake bound ; and one legend (though another less pleasing attaches to the staff of Mercury) runs that Hermes once found two snakes fighting, and, having separated them, twisted them round his caduceus, or herald's staff, as typical of peace restored. At first this staff was of entwisted olive branches adorned with white ribands which is still the colour of peace; but in later representations of the herald divinity snakes take the place of the ribands. For a different reason the wand of "the Snakes in Nature. 49 blameless physician " carried serpents, the art of yEsculapius being here symbolised by the creature which " renews its youth," and was supposed to have an instinctive knowledge of the healing virtues of herbs. The brazen serpent of the Mosaic wilderness had, in this restorative and curative significance, been anticipated in the temple courts of Epidaurus. It affords a simile on empiric nostrums. Thus Green, in his poem on The Spleen "A corporation, The brazen serpent of the nation, Which, when hard accidents distressed, The poor must look at to be blessed." But as a rule it is "vengeful;" "pernicious;" "with venom fraught ; " " painted and empoisoned ; " the supreme peril ("you might as safely waken a serpent," is an accepted comparison for the most hazardous enterprises *) ; a creature of secret ways, " more hid than paths of snakes " (Davenant); the uttermost symbol of desolation. "Palmyra's ruins " have no tenant but the hissing serpent " (Moore) ; it sits on the "Rajah's throne" when the lawful dynasty is extinct (Hemans) ; " rolls " through the "deserted market and the pleading-place, Choked with brambles and o'er- grown with grass " (Cowley) : and so in Coleridge : "The mighty columns were but sand, And lazy snakes trail o'er the level ruins." The movement of the snake, so suggestive at once of subtlety and of strength, so wonderfully elegant and yet awe-inspiring, could not fail to arrest the poet's attention and provoke his admiration 1 ' ' Pauses ere he wake The slumbering venom of the folded snake : The first may turn, but not avenge the blow, The last expires, but leaves no living foe ; Fast to the doom'd offender's form it clings, And he may crush not conquer still it stings ! " Byron. D 5o The Poets and Nature. " And when they paint the serpent's scaly pride, Their lines should hiss, their numbers smoothly glide." Abundant recognition, therefore, is given to the striking grace with which these fearsome things sinuously glide, and as if obeying the attraction of some invisible magnet rather than progressing by any voluntary exercise of muscle, move from place to place. Many fine images are thus suggested, and finest of all is Keats : " At this, through all his bulk an agony Crept gradual, from the feet into the crown ; Like a lithe serpent vast and muscular Making slow way, with head and neck convulsed From overstrained might." But Virgil's fine picture of the wounded snake that "drags its slow length along" has many admirers : 1 ' The trodden serpent on the grass Long behind his wounded volume trails." That wonderfully poetical touch in Nature of placing serpents in all her Edens, giving them the most exquisite foliage and flowers for their ambush, is not wasted on poets. But I cannot help thinking that they strike a false note when they make the presence of the snake detract from the beauty of the blossoms under which it hides. Roses, as Shakspeare says, are not ' l deceitful " because the adder is beneath. The contrast is itself sufficient, and if any moral is to be drawn, it might better be one of apology for the dangerous reptile in seeking such a resting-place than of reproach for the innocent flower. The rose, curiously enough, is specially selected as the serpent's retreat : " As poisonous serpents make their dread repose Beneath the covert of the fragrant rose." Yet it is improbable that snakes often go to sleep under a rose bush, except our own harmless reptile in England. To tread on a serpent is proverbially perilous, but how ludi- Snakes in Natitre. 5 1 crous the whole situation becomes, when as in King, trodden gives place to spurned. " Fell as a spurned serpent as she shoots along With lightning in her eyes, poison in her tongue." Moreover, oddly enough, in plant-lore, this particular flower is one of those said to be distasteful to venomous reptiles. That serpents specially affected the rose as their lurking- place, is, then, a poetical fancy, natural enough when the desire for strong contrast is needed, but not supported by any traditions. The beautiful, sweet-scented rose, the de- light of the fair, is a striking contradiction to the "hideous, foul-smelling " reptile, the terror of the sex ; and folk-lore does not encourage the association. Snakes, so the people's traditions say, love lavender and walnut-trees and fennel. " More pleased my sense," says Satan to Eve, "than smell of sweetest fennel." It was supposed to assist them in casting their skins, thus restoring youth, and in brightening their eyes dimmed by old age. They hate and flee from hemlock, southernwood, and rue. Indeed, so violent and notorious is the reptile's aversion to the last-named that its antagonists take advantage of it, to fortify themselves against its assaults. Thus " when the Weesil is to fight with the Serpent, she armeth herselfe by eating Rue against the might of the Serpent ; " which is a curious reproduction of the fiction of the mongoose's eating of the "aristolochia," another of the snake's vegetable anti- pathies. As to the southernwood, I have my doubts, in spite of Lucan : " There the large branches of the long-lived hart, With southernwood their odours strong impart ; The monsters of the land, the serpents fell, Fly far away, and shun the hostile smell." For during the Afghan campaign I rode through leagues 52 The Poets and Nature. of it, and found snakes as common amongst it as in the highly-aromatic sage-brush of Western America. It is worth noting, though, how, in a way analogous to the " doctrine of signatures," the strong-smelling, aromatic snakes are popularly connected with the most odorous herbs lavender, walnut, fennel, rue, and "old-man." Nor will snakes, tradition says, come under the juniper or the ash-tree. So Cowley has " But that which gave more wonder than the rest, Within an ash a serpent built her nest And laid her eggs : where erst to come beneath The very shadow of the ash were death." " The leaves of this tree," saith an old herbalist, " are of so great virtue against serpents that they dare not so much as touch the morning and evening shadowes of the tree, but shun them afar off, as Pliny reports. He also affirmeth that the serpent being hemmed in with boughes laid round about, will sooner run into the fire, if any be there, than come neare the boughes of the ash ; and that the ash flowereth befor the serpents appear, and doth not cast its leaves befor they be gon again. ' We write (saith he) upon experience, that if the serpent be set within a circle of fire and the branches, the serpent will sooner run into the fire than into the boughes. It is a wonderfull courtesie in nature, that the ash should flower befor the serpents appear, and not cast her leaves befor they be gon again.' " If they have to be driven away, nothing is more efficacious than the strewing of leaves of star-wort on the ground, or, " which doth astonish them," sprigs of that virtuous herb dittany. Should any one be bitten by snakes, tradition assures a complete antidote in the adder's-tongue fern : " For them that are with newts, or snakes, or adders stung He seeketh out an herb that is called adder's tongue ; As Nature it ordained its own like hurt to cure, And sportive did herself to niceties insure." Snakes in Nature. 53 Are more wanted? Then take bramble leaves or herb- william, bugloss, horehound, betony, hawk-weed, or a cross made of hazel twigs. Indeed, bugloss and dittany will not only cure the bitten but kill the biter all of which is very curious and pathetically human, seeing that these weeds are but common wayside wildings, and not some upas or man- chineel or dreadful Chilian serpent-tree. That these should chill the fiery, blood-kindling venom of snakes we could almost be content to imagine. Their own juices are too fatal for serpents' rivalry. It is easy, therefore, to see how these reptiles came to possess the reputation of being cunning in herbs, and so, illogically (after the manner of popular beliefs), of being themselves medicinal, their flesh not only wholesome and curative but miraculous in its virtues, endowing with the knowledge of the speech of animals, and of the hiding-place of buried treasures, and their effigies to be the acknowledged crest and trade-mark of physicians from ^Esculapius to Holloway. Hygeia herself always carries a serpent; and in this connection how delightfully consular and Roman is that anecdote of Exagoras, the ambassador from Cyprus. He came to Rome and bored them all so dreadfully with talking about the virtues of herbs and snakes that the consuls had him put into a tank full of serpents to test his long-winded theories. And the odd thing was, the vipers would not touch the ambassador. Nor, as a testimonial to the serpent's ability as an herbalist, is the following incident to be neglected. Glaucus, son of Minos, died, and the king, his father, in a high-handed fashion, shut up a certain one in the family vault with the corpse, telling him that he should never come out alive unless his son did so too. The unfortunate man sat him down, disconsolately enough, we may suppose, by the side of the dead body, when, suddenly, there appeared a snake, which, as he saw it was about to crawl upon the bier, he 54 The Poets and Nat^lre. killed. Soon after, in came a second snake, and it, on per- ceiving its dead relative, hastily retreated, but, by-and-by, returning with a sprig of herb in its mouth, restored the first snake to life. Acting on the hint, the prisoner took the precious vegetable, and rubbing Glaucus' corpse with it, had shortly the satisfaction of walking out of the mausoleum arm-in-arm with the revivified prince. That the "glossy vine" was a "serpent charm" is a poetical tradition new to me, and may perhaps be an error for that other plant of Bacchus the "glossy" ivy. Nor can I trace Wyatt's superstition " That snakes have twice to cast away their stings." British snakes being harmless are not in harmony with the poetical serpent "idea," and seldom occur in verse. In Coleridge and Wordsworth, " hurrying along the drifted forest leaves, the scared snake rustles ; " but twice only, as far as I am aware, that pretty creature, our " grass-snake," receives kindly mention. These notable exceptions are in the verse of that delightful poet of nature, Hurdis, who speaks in the Favourite Village of "the viper and the basking eft " "And spotted snakes, innocuous as they glide, With whisper not unwelcome," and Marvell, who presents his beloved shepherdess with "a harmless snake." CHAPTER IV. SNAKES IN TRADITION. TRADITIONS, whether ancient or modern, all conspire to make the serpent-folk inhabitants either of a subterranean darkness or of the earth's most desolate places, black creviced rocks and rotting vegetation, blistering desert sands and festering swamps. They are the outlaws of animal society. Erebus and lower Orcus and Tartarus below Hades know them. They are familiars of the gloomy shades by Styx, in the caverned banks of Acheron and Cocytus, the Cimmerian darkness beside Avernus. And wherever we find them, they are the rejected of creation, and for ever grovelling upon their bellies and sulkily tracing upon the dust the hieroglyphic record of the original curse. Yet how differently the lives of these splendid and powerful beings are really passed. What creatures revel in more exquisite vegetation of leaf and blossom than the boas, anacondas, and pythons? and do not snakes share with fish their abodes in sea and river and lake ? Indeed, there is no family of wild life that traverses so completely every experience of delightful habitation. Nor does tradition sufficiently set forth the great snake- parable, with its awful significances of latent mischief, ambushed in such beauty. " Not even the plumage of the Birds of Paradise can excel the purples, blues, and gold of a python that has just cast its slough, while an infinite and terrible interest underlies those iridescent charms from the 56 The Poets and Nature. fact that the coils, soft as rose leaves, and shot with colours like a dove's breast, can crush the life out of a jaguar in all its rage, and slowly squeeze it into pulp. Watch its breathing ; it is as gentle as a child's. Let danger threaten, however, and lightning is hardly quicker than the dart of those vengeful convolutions. The gleaming length rustles proudly into menace, and instead of the voluptuous lazy thing of a moment ago, the python, with all its terrors complete, erects itself defiantly, thrilling, so it seems, with eager passion in every scale, and tracing on the air with threatening head the circle within which is death." No wonder that the world has always held the serpent in awe, and that nations should have worshipped, and still worship, this emblem of destruction. It is fate itself, inevitable as destiny, deliberate as reason, incomprehensible as Providence. Yet in poetry they figure invariably as the instruments of divine wrath, the objects of popular detestation, the most hateful metamorphoses of humanity, the incarnations of sin. Their graces are deceits, their powers malign. From their very criminality they command reverence as being potential. Even the legends of their beneficence do them no good. They are wise, but only as the bad, as witches, as the devils, are wise. Huma- nity begrudges them even the credit for their lapses into benignity, and hardly forgives them honourable memories. "Both gods and heroes alike held victory over the snake as the supreme criterion of valour. They graduated to divinity by slaying serpents. Indra and Vishnu conquer snakes, Hercules has his hydra, St. George his dragon, and Apollo his python. It is over the body of Ladon, terrible progeny of a terrible parentage Typhon the father and Echidna the dam that the hero steps to gather the golden apples ; and across the dread chameleonising coils of Fafnir, that Sigurd reaches out his hand to the treasures of Brunhild on the glistening heath. What more fearful in Oriental myth than Vritna ; the endless thing which the gods overcome ; or Snakes in Tradition. 57 Kalinak, the black death ; or Ahi, the throttler ? Jason and Perseus, Feridun and Odin, claim triumph over the snake as the chiefest of their glories, and it would be tedious to recapitulate the multitude of myths through which ' the dire worm ' has come down to our own time dignified and made awful by the honours and fears of the past." Foremost of all the reptiles of tradition is that " spirited sly snake," " the enemy of mankind," that " unparadised the world." 1 ' Say first what cause Mov'd our grand parents, in that happy state, Favour'd of Heav'n so highly, to fall off From their Creator, and transgress His will For one restraint, lords of the world besides? Who first seduc'd them to that foul revolt? Th' infernal Serpent." In " Paradise Lost," the Satanic vehicle is always of great dignity, and however seriously it may be denounced is treated with severe respect. In some other poets it is scarcely so important a personage. Cowper, indeed, makes it ridiculous. Marvell has this quaint fancy " When our first parents Paradise did grace, The serpent was the prelate of the place ; Fond Eve did, for this subtle tempter's sake, From the forbidden tree the pippin take ; His God and Lord this preacher did betray, To have the weaker vessel made his prey." And Cowley this " Oh Solitude ! first state of human kind, Which blessed remained till man did find Eve his own help and company ; As soon as two, alas ! together joined, The serpent made up three." But with Milton my only fault is that he sat down to write of the Temptation unfairly prejudiced against the snake. He is fanatically, Puritanically, inflexible : refuses to give it, as he does King Charles, the benefit of a generous doubt. Neither the one nor the other was without compulsion in 58 The Poets and Natitre. error but what of that ? Like the stout Roundhead that he was, he looked only at the ultimate offence, and would not take extenuating circumstances into consideration ' ' The serpent sly Insinuating, wove with Gordian twine His braided train, and of his fatal guile Gave proof unheeded. " This passage is from Milton's description of the Garden of Eden, and is his first reference to the creature which he afterwards, when its body had been invaded by Satan, loads with such infamy. It is for my purpose, a notable passage, as showing how the great poet allowed his knowledge of the sequel to prejudice him beforehand against the snake when it was then, as he himself later on proves, a harmless beast, a favourite of Eve's, and as yet perfectly innocent. Sin had not as yet entered Paradise. " Frisking played All beasts of the earth, since wild, and of all chase In wood or wilderness, forest or den : Sporting the lion ramped, and in his paw Dandled the kid ; bears, tigers, ounces, pards, Gambol'd before them." Only the snake is described as created in original sin and being naturally vicious, of "fatal guile." Milton no doubt thought he had inspired authority for separating this one animal from all the others by such a terrific chasm, for in Genesis we read, " Now, the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field." But I understand the authorities upon the Scriptures would read this in an esoteric sense, just as in the New Testament they do not take categorically our Lord's advice, "Be wise as serpents." Was it really intended by the Inspirer of Genesis that the snake should be held up to calumny ? At any rate, it seems to me incon- testable that no poet had the privilege to " mar creation's plan," by supposing that in the sinless garden there was Snakes in Tradition. 59 placed one sinful beast. The idea of this solitary iniquity in Paradise is intolerable. Later on, Satan determines to pervert the snake, take possession of its body, and bedevil its innocent animal intelligence with something worse than human wickedness. He makes up his mind to find " The serpent sleeping, in whose mazy folds To hide him, and the dark intent he brought ; " and so descends in the form of a black mist to look for the devoted creature : " Him fast-sleeping soon he found, In labyrinth of many a round self-rolled, His head the midst, well stor'd with subtle wiles ; Not yet in horrid shade or dismal den, Nor nocent yet, but on the grassy herb Fearless, unfeared, he slept. In at his mouth The Devil entered, and his brutal sense, In heart or head, possessing, soon inspired With act intelligential ; but his sleep Disturbed not." Up to this point, therefore, the wretched serpent is the passive victim of a most atrocious trespass. Henceforth it is not its own self but " possessed," and no more to blame than the bedevilled swine of Gadara, It has been made the instrument of a designing villain ; which was its misfor- tune, not its fault ; and in its second state it was not, to my thinking, a bit more culpable than in its first. For it was not responsible for itself, being under the direct control of the Fiend " incarnate and imbruted " in its form. That the Creator subsequently judged otherwise, and took away the serpent's legs as a punishment for the part it had played in the great tragedy, only shows the infirmity of human judgment, and must be accepted in the same humility of mind as the visiting of a man's sins upon the fourth generation of his posterity, and quite apart from mortal theories of justice. Milton, however, would remove the apparent hardship of the 60 The Poets and Nature. serpent's lot first misused by the Devil and then punished by God by making it a conscious accomplice of Satan. He commences with saying that when everything else created was innocuous and amiable, it alone was filled with " fatal guile." Then when the Tempter finds it asleep, the poet describes its head as "well stored with subtle wiles;" and subsequently, when Eve hears it begin to talk, she addresses it in amazement thus : " Thee, serpent, subtlest beast of all the field I knew, but not with human voice endued." So that not only is the snake originally wicked, but Eve, that miracle of heavenly innocence, actually knows it. Surely this idea, that suspicion was present in Paradise, spoils the whole picture. That the poet himself seems to recognise his difficulty is, I think, evident ; for besides his iteration of the original, native, badness of the serpent (itself significant), he makes Satan, when informing the chiefs of hell of his triumph over man, and the subsequent curse, deride thus : " Me also hath He judged, or rather Afe not, but the brute serpent, in whose shape Man I deceived." Throughout the latter part of his speech Satan tries, and successfully, to make the Fall ridiculous, for his audience laugh when they hear about the apple ; and then he goes on to deride what seems to him, and to Milton, the vicarious culpation of the serpent. However, to continue "the poet's splendidly original description of the snake, we find Satan, a " mere serpent in appearance," searching all the favourite haunts of our first parents, and at last, "beyond his hope," he spies Eve all alone tending her flowers. The sight of her beauty strikes him at first "stupidly good," as the poet puts it, but immediately thereafter inflames him with fiercer envy of Snakes in Tradition. 61 Adam's happy lot, and he moves on, soliloquising as he goes upon the ruin he is about to work : '" So spake th" enemy of mankind, inclosed In serpent, inmate bad, and toward Eve Addressed his way, not with indented wave, Prone to the ground, as since, but on his rear, Circular base of rising folds, that towered Fold above fold a surging maze, his head Crested aloft, and carbuncle his eyes ; With burnished neck of verdant gold, erect Amidst his circling spires, that on the grass Floated redundant : pleasing was his shape, And lovely ; never since of serpent kind Lovelier." But he does not approach Eve directly, but "with tract oblique, as one who sought access, but feared to interrupt, sidelong he worked his way," and when in her sight he dis- plays himself to catch her attention : 1 ' Curled many a wanton wreath in sight of Eve, To lure her eye." She hears him rustling, but does not look up, being so accustomed to the beasts disporting themselves about her and vying with each other for her regard. So the snake comes right in front of her " as in gaze admiring." " Oft he bow'd . His turret crest and sleek enamel'd neck, Fawning, and licked the ground whereon she trod. His gentle dumb expression turned at length The eye of Eve to mark his play." Her attention thus won, the tragedy commences. She asks him in astonishment how he came to have human speech. He replies (" the spirited, sly snake "), by eating of a certain fruit. She asks where the tree stands ? " To whom the wily adder, blithe and glad : Empress, the way is ready, and not long ; ... If thou accept My conduct, I can bring thee thither soon." 62 The Poets and Nature. " Lead, then," says Eve ; and the serpent willingly starts off. 1 ' He leading swiftly rolled In tangles, and made intricate seem straight, To mischief swift. " His crest flashes with hope, and like an ignis fatuus 11 glistered the dire snake " as he led Eve, ' ' Our credulous mother, to the tree Of prohibition, root of all our woes." She sees, is tempted, and falls. 1 ' Earth felt the wound ; and Nature from her seat Sighing, through all her works gave signs of woe, That all was lost ! Back to the thicket slunk The guilty serpent," and thereafter disappears from Eden. The curse is pro- nounced, and Satan, reaching his own dominions, seats himself upon his throne, and addressing the assembly of fallen angels, "Thrones, dominations, princedoms, virtues, powers," boasts of what he has done, and then pauses for " their universal shout and high applause to fill his ear." Instead of that 1 ' he hears On all sides, from innumerable tongues, A dismal universal hiss ; " and then Satan begins to feel himself turning into a snake. " His arms clung to his ribs, his legs intwining each other," till he falls off his throne "a monstrous serpent, on his belly prone." In vain he attempts to address his captains, for he can only hiss ; and then issuing from the hall the rout of " complicated monsters " swarm into the open air, where all the fallen host are awaiting their appearance, and, instead of their chiefs, see "a crowd of ugly serpents." At the sight, horror seizes them and they begin to change too, " the dire form catched by contagion," until the whole of Satan's followers are turned to hissing snakes. And lo ! by Snakes in Tradition. 63 divine miracle a grove of trees resembling the " dread pro- bationary Tree" of Eden, heavy with luscious fruit; and the scaly multitude, " rolling in heaps," scale the boughs, hoping to eat But the fruit turns to "bitter ashes" in their mouths ; yet goaded on by thirst and hunger, they attempt to eat again and again; "with hatefullest disrelish writhed their jaws, with soot and cinders filled ; " then worn out with famine and with "ceaseless hissing," they are temporarily respited and resume their proper shapes ; to which Milton adds this legend : " Yearly enjoined, some say, to undergo This annual humbling certain numbered days, To dash their pride, and joy for man seduced." Such is the demoniacal serpent of Milton, and it is assuredly a fine creation the foremost reptile in poetry. How pitifully inadequate, after such a dignified flight, is Cowper's " flittermouse wing" attempting the same lofty theme. Here, for instance, is his curse, a travesty upon the original : " Prone on thy belly, serpent, thou shalt grovel, As if to man suggesting, Dark as the riddling God, man is of clay ; And clay shalt thou be, destitute of soul, As destitute of soul each other reptile." It is the " Stygian," the " cruel " serpent, recognised by both Adam and Eve as " empoisoned." Yet she admires it, the monstrous hybrid : " A human breast it has, The rest is serpent all ; Oh ! how the sun, emblazing with its rays These gorgeous scales with glowing colours bright, O'erwhelms my dazzled eyes." And Adam specially points it out to her as a solace in occasional solitude : 64 The Poets and Natiire. " If weary amidst the flowers, Thou seek'st to close thine eyes, Behold ! with flattering pinions at thy feet, A serpent midst the flowers darts and hisses." And can anything be more odious in comparison with the noble purity of Milton's treatment of the theme, than Cowper making Eve longingly guess at the pleasures of wedded life from observing the connubial complexities of snakes? " Look there and see amidst the thousand folds Those close entwisted snakes, That in a single being seem combined Coy Adam, even these Weave the close web of love. " This poet further makes Eve call the serpent to its face "snaky:" " Your looks are snaky, and your glance malign." As for Satan, whom Cowper calls " Beelzebub," he is a perfectly ridiculous personage, the very Bumble of devils. In his poem on the Tree of Knowledge, Cowley supposes the serpent to be Pride, allegorically typified : " Henceforth, said God, the wretched sons of earth Shall sweat for food in vain, That will not long sustain ; And bring, with labour, forth each fond abortive birth ; That serpent, too, their pride, Which aims at things deny'd That learn'd and el'quent lust- Instead of mounting high, shall creep upon the dust." In the " Davideis " the snake again appears as the author of mischief. The scene opens in Hell with Lucifer, in the form of a gigantic serpent, seated on high : " Anon, a thousand devils run roaming in, Some with a dreadful smile, deform'dly grin ; Some stamp their cloven paws, some foam and tear The gaping snakes from their black knotted hair." Snakes in Tradition. 65 But Lucifer is outrageously grotesque. The rising star of David, and the promise of the Messiah through his seed, has filled Satan with fury. He cannot conceal his emotion on hearing the news : "Thrice did he knock his iron teeth, thrice howl ; " and then, relieved, he reproaches his devils, and asks them why they are not up and doing, instead of stopping at home in Hell "playing with their idle serpents." But his rage chokes further utterance, and breaks off in a hemistich, short by two feet of the proper line, and "With that, with his long tail he lashed his breast, And, horribly, spoke out in looks the rest." This outburst frightens the crowd into such silence that " No hiss of snake, no clank of chain, was known, The souls, amidst their tortures, durst not groan." You might have heard a pin drop. But soon there is a movement in the " dire throng," and Envy crawls forth : " Her black locks hung long, Attired with curling serpents ; her pale skin Was almost dropp'd from the sharp bones within ; And at her breast stuck vipers, which did prey Upon her panting heart." This dreadful personage volunteers her services, and after re- counting her previous exploits very much after the manner of one of Mayne Reid's " braves " going out to scalp a pale- faceoffers to inspire Saul with mortal jealousy of David : " She spoke. All stared at first, and made a pause ; But straight the general murmur of applause Ran through Death's courts." "Great Beelzebub" starts up "to embrace the fiend," but she dodges him and is off. " The snakes all hissed, the fiends all murmured." E 66 The Poets and Nature. Arriving at Saul's palace, she assumes the form of " Father Benjamin," and approaching the slumbering prince, upbraids him for allowing David, "a boy and minstrel," to steal away his people's love and his crown, and exhorts him to be "whole Saul," and rid himself of the son of Jesse. "With that she takes One of her worst, her best-beloved, snakes ; ' Softly, dear worm ! soft and unseen,' said she, ' Into his bosom steal, and in it be My viceroy ! '" Cowley, again, speaking of the transformation of Aaron's rod (which he calls " Moses' wand ") says : " It gaped and hissed aloud, With flaming eyes survey'd the trembling crowd, And like a basilisk almost looked the assembly dead. Swift fled th' amazed king, the guards before him fled ; " which is a curious misreading of Holy Writ, inasmuch as Pharaoh, in the hardness of his heart, only recognised in the miracle one of the commonest tricks of his own court jugglers. Instead of flying amazed before "the Almighty wand," he sent, we are told, for the "magicians of Egypt," who, at his orders, repeated the miracle. Cowley's version of the incident is as follows : " Jannes and Jambres stopp'd their fight, And with proud words allay'd th' affright. ' The god of slaves,' said they, ' how can he be More powerful than their master's deity ? ' And down they cast their rods, And muttered secret sounds that charm the servile gods. The evil spirits their charms obey. All in a subtle cloud they snatched the rods away, And serpents in their place the airy jugglers lay. Serpents in Egypt's monstrous land Were ready still at hand, And all at th' Old Serpent's first command : And they, too, gaped, and they, too, hissed, And they their threatening tails did twist ; Snakes in Tradition. 67 But straight on both the Hebrew serpent flew, Broke both their active backs, and both it slew, And both almost at once devoured." But it will be seen that here the poet as much detracts from the authorised narrative as previously he had added to it, inasmuch as from Holy Writ we gather that Aaron's rod devoured more than two of the others, for the verse runs, "They cast down every man his rod and they became serpents : but Aaron's rod swallowed up their rods." For myself I confess I have always imagined fancy being led thereto by a picture in an illustrated Bible which much attracted me in childhood that the floor of Pharaoh's palace -was fairly littered with snakes, and that no part of the miracle was quite so miraculous as Aaron's serpent which, as depicted, was no bigger than most, and not so big as some being able to contain all the rest. Doubtless my timid scepticism on this point was conciliated by being reminded of the extraordinary containing-capacity of other kinds of snakes, and by some such zoological " fact " as the boa-constrictor's habit of swallowing bulls. Crashaw has exactly the same story as that of the "Davideis," except that Cruelty takes the place of Envy. Lucifer, " mischiefs old Master," hears in Hell of the birth of the Messiah, and determines to baulk the Almighty. He summons his ministers, and, though many volunteer, he selects Cruelty whom the poet calls "the fourth Fury" and sends her forth to pervert Herod. Assuming the shape of Father Joseph, she approaches the sleeping Tetrarch, and, in language very similar indeed to that of the "Davideis," fills his breast with the horrible suggestion of the Massacre of the Innocents. " Be Herod," she whispers, and vanishes. " So said her richest snake, which to her wrist, For a beseeming bracelet she had tied, (A special worm it was, as ever kissed The foamy lips of Cerberus) she applied 68 The Poets and Nature. To the king's heart ; the snake no sooner hissed But Virtue heard it, and away she hied." His Hell, by the way, is simply a wilderness of snakes. How grandly different are Milton's pictures of the Arch- Fiend in his monster-shape ! The scene is the Tartarian lake, "as one great furnace flaming," a "fiery deluge, fed with ever-burning sulphur unconsumed." Satan recognises Beelzebub " weltering by his side," and they converse. The Arch-Fiend is thus described : " With head uplift above the wave, and eyes That sparkling blazed, his other parts beside Prone on the flood, extended long and large, Lay floating many a rood, in bulk as large As whom the fables name of monstrous size, Titanian, or Earth-born, that warr'd on Jove, Briareus or Typhon, whom the sea By ancient Tarsus held, or that sea-beast, Leviathan, which God, of all His works, Created hugest that swim th' ocean stream." Later, when he is in eager flight, this fine image is em- ployed : " As when a gyphon through the wilderness, With winged course, o'er hill or moor or dale, Pursues the Arimaspian, who by stealth Had from his wakeful custody purloined The guarded gold." And afterwards, when the actual transformation of the rebellious host into serpents is described, we see their chief " Still greatest in the midst, Now dragon grown, larger than whom the sun Ingender'd in the Pythian vale or slime, Huge Python." 1 There is nobility of fancy throughout. Traditionally the snake is " crested," so no poet refers to a snake of any importance without mentioning its crest. 1 The python, curiously enough, has the vestiges of legs. P. R. Snakes in Tradition. 69 This is a poetical rule to which there is no exception. It is Biblical, Homeric, heraldic, but none the less preposterous. No snake has a crest. Some have inflations of the neck below the head : a few very small vipers have prickles upon their heads. But there is nothing in all herpetology to warrant the " koruthaiolos " idea in which poets delight. Classical tradition, however, abounds with it. So Milton adopts it, and all others follow his example. But this and other varieties of the poetic " basilisk " will be found duly treated of in their proper places among the Fauna of Fancy. Among the individual snakes of tradition, foremost, perhaps, are those of the Furies "Revenge! Revenge! Timotheus cries ; See the furies arise ! , See the snakes that they rear, How they hiss in their hair ! And the sparkles that flash From their eyes ! " more ancient than the Olympian gods, living in dark Tartarus, but issuing thence to punish the infamous with perpetual unrest and successive miseries. Tisiphone, too "A hundred snakes her gloomy visage shade, A hundred serpents guard her horrid head." and " fierce Alecto," with snaky tresses that listen and watch while she sleeps ; and Megaera " Tossing her vipers round, Which, hissing, pour their poison on the ground." The Gorgon again, "terrible Medusa," with her " long snaky locks of adder-black hair " "His dark hair That pale brow wildly wreathing round, As if the Gorgon there had bound The sablest of the serpent-braid That o'er her fearful forehead stray'd. " Byron. Surely one of the saddest, most unfortunate of maidens, 7o The Poets and Nature. once so beautiful that gods wooed her, afterwards so dread- ful that the mere sight of her face terrified men into stone a notable illustration of "disastrous love" and of the malignity of female revenge. Temples, no doubt, ought to be respected, but whenever I think of Medusa's fate and her "fearful head" with its "crested" snakes, my opinion of Poseidon is not complimentary to that amphibious divinity. Next, the assailants of Laocoon, immortalised in noble epic and almost as noble marble : " Round sire and sons the scaly monsters rolled Ring above ring, in many a tangled fold ; Close, and more close, their writhing limbs surround, And fix with foaming teeth the envenomed wound." ' Or, turning to the Vatican, go see Laocoon's torture dignifying pain A father's love and mortal's agony With an immortal's patience blending : Vain The struggle ; vain, against the coiling strain And gripe, and deepening of the dragon's grasp, The old man's clench ; the long envenom'd chain Rivets the living links, the enormous asp Enforces pang on pang, and stifles gasp on gasp." Byron. ' At last her utmost Masterpieces she found, That Maro fir'd ; the miserable sire, Wrapt with his sons in Fate's severest grasp. The serpents, twisting round, their stringent folds Inextricable tie. Such passion here, Such agonies, such bitterness of pain, Seem so to tremble through the tortur'd stone, That the touch' d heart engrosses all the view. Almost unmask'd the best proportions pass, That ever Greece beheld ; and, seen alone, On the rapt eye th* imperious passions seize : The father's double pangs, both for himself And sons convuls'd ; to Heaven his rueful look, Imploring aid, and half-accusing, cast; His fell despair with indignation mixt, As the strong-curling monsters from his side His full-extended fury cannot tear. Snakes in Tradition. 7 1 More tender touch'd, with varied art, his sons All the soft rage of younger passions show, In a boy's helpless fate one sinks oppress'd ; While, yet unpierc'd, the frighted other tries His foot to steal out of the horrid twine." Thomson. Then the " dread snakes," who "at Juno's vengeful nod, climbed round the cradle of the sleeping god." But the baby happens to be Hercules, and " Waked by the shrilling hiss and rustling sound, And shrieks of fair attendants fainting round, Their gasping throats with clenching hands he holds, And death entwists their convoluted folds." Of Cadmus, "how with the serpent's teeth he sowed the soil, and reaped an iron harvest of his toil ! " from which Coleridge draws the moral : " Who sows the serpent's teeth, let him not hope To reap a joyous harvest. Every crime Has, in the moment of its preparation, Its own avenging angel, dark misgiving, An ominous sinking at the inmost heart." Of lapetus, whom Keats sees grasping "A serpent's plashy neck, its barbed tongue Squeezed from the gorge, and all its uncurl'd length Dead : and because the creature could not spit Its poison in the eyes of conquering Jove." The living bolts of the warring Titans, of Apollo's prowess, " Latona's bane " " Who slew Phiton the serpent where he lay Sleeping against the sun upon a day." Of the Egyptian Cleopatra, "regal dressed, with the aspic at her breast " " I am the worm the weary prize, The Nile's soft asp, One that a Queen has loved to clasp." 72 The Poets and Nature. Nor are the serpent-reverences of contemporary cult for- gotten, the snake-gods of India, where, as Sir W. Jones sings " Taraka, vuth snaky legions, Envious of supernal powers, Menaces old Meru's golden head, And Indra's beamy regions, With desolation wild bespread." Foremost of these is Anantas, "the king of serpents, with his thousand heads," the infinite " That serpent old, Which clasped the great world in its fold, And brooded over earth and the charmed sea Like endless, restless, drear Eternity ; " and next Shesh, " whose diamond sun makes subterranean day." The poet refers here without a doubt to that fine legend of the Indian aborigines the Nagas, or "snake-men," who say that once upon a time, and perhaps they are right, they possessed the land, but were driven into the hill-fast- nesses which they now inhabit by successive waves of invasion, and that their great captain and divinity Shesh, "the king of serpents" fled underground, and in con- tempt of the sunlight from which he had been exiled, created the Kanthi-stone, more brilliant than a whole rock of diamond, by the light of which he keeps the diary of the earth, and solemnly records the procession of the ages. 1 This Shesh, "that never dies," and "whose hiss the round 1 The Cherokee Indians of the West have much the same legend as the Nagas of the East, and Mrs. Hemans refers to " The mighty serpent king Midst the grey rocks, his old domain," who is supposed to dwell in the central recesses of the mountains, the chief of the rattlesnakes, and who, though subterranean, is honoured as the "light-giver." P. R. Snakes in Tradition. 73 creation awes," is a reptile worthy of homage, and may be accepted without hesitation and in defiance of all sea- serpents, past and future, as the greatest snake on record. When Vishnu and the gods meet to extort from the sea the ichor of immortality, they pluck up from the Himalayan range the biggest mountain in it, and this they make their churn, while around it, as the strongest tackle they could think of, they bound the serpent Shesh. And the gods took hold of the head, and the devils took hold of the tail, and, alternately tugging, they made the mountain spin round and round, until the sea was churned into froth, and from the churning came up all the treasures of the deep, and the most precious possessions of man, and last of all Immortality. The gods and the devils scrambled for all the good things, but nothing more is said of the serpent who had been so useful, nor what he got for his services. Antiquaries in the West incline to think that he remained in the sea and became the kraken ; but the Nagas believe him to be still under the hills dispensing fate by the light of a diamond. When, too, Lakshmi fixes her admiring eyes upon " the azure Hari," he started at the summons of love : " Straight o'er the deep, then dimpling smooth, he rushed, And towards th' unmeasured snake's stupendous bed The world's great mother, not reluctant, led. All Nature glow'd whene'er she smiled or blushed ; The king of serpents hushed His thousand heads, where diamond mirrors blazed That multiplied her image as he gazed." To these succeed a procession of the "serpents of Romance," " sleepless and stern to guard the golden sight ; " the great reptiles of knightly story. Southey's " Romance's serpent winds the glittering fold." Of the victories of the chivalrous over these baleful monsters there is no end : 74 The Poets and Natiire. " Soon to a yawning rift Chance turn'd my way, A den it prov'd where a huge serpent lay ; Flame ey'd he lay : he rages now for food, Meets my first glance, and meditates my blood. His bulk, in many a gather'd orb uproll'd, Rears spire on spire. His scales bedropt with gold Shine burnish'd in the sun. Such height they gain They dart green lustre on the distant main. Now wreath'd in dreadful slope, he stoops his crest, Furious to fix on my unshielded breast ! Just as he springs my sabre smites the foe ; Headless he falls beneath the unerring blow. Wrath yet remains, though strength his fabric leaves, And the meant hiss the gaping mouth deceives ; The lengthening trunk slow loosens ev'ry fold, Lingers in life, then stretches stiff and cold." Savage. But, as characteristic of human anxiety never to leave triumph wholly with the reptile that was "devoted to defeat" in Eden, the following quotations (from Drayton and the "Reliques") showing how innocence can vanquish, even though unarmed, are well worth notice : " Him by strength into a dungeon thrust, In whose black bottom, long two serpents had remain'd (Bred in the common sewer that all the city drain'd), Empoisoning with their smell ; which seized him for their prey ; With whom in struggling long (besmeared with blood and clay) He rent their squalid chaps, and from the prison "scaped." The following is even more to the point : " And adders, snakes, and toads therein, As afterwards was known, Long in this loathsome vault had bin, And were to monsters grown." Into this foul and fearful place the fair one, innocent, was cast. " The door being open'd straight they found The virgin stretch'd along ; Two dreadful snakes had wrapt her round, Which her to death had stung, Snakes in Tradition. 75 One round her legs, her thighs, her waist, Had twin'd his fatal wreath : The other close her neck embrac'd, And stopt her gentle breath. The snakes, being from her body thrust, Their bellies were so fill'd, That with excess of blood they burst, Thus with their prey were kill'd." But distinct from all others is the tradition of the Lamia " Thou smoothed-lipped serpent surely high-inspired, Thou beauteous wreath with melancholy eyes." " Philostratus, in his fourth book, hath a memorable instance in this kind, which I may not omit, of one Menippus Lycius, a young man twenty-five years of age, that, going betwixt Cenchreas and Corinth, met such a phantasm in the habit of a fair gentlewoman, which, after taking him by the hand, carried him home to her house, in the suburbs of Corinth, and told him she was a Phoenician by birth, and if he would tarry with her he would hear her sing and play, and drink such wine as never any drank, and no man should molest him ; but she, being fair and lovely, would die with him, that was fair and lovely to behold. The young man, a philosopher, otherwise staid and discreet, able to moderate his passions, though not that of love, tarried with her awhile to his great content, and at last married her, to whose wedding, among other guests, came Apoll- onious, who, by some probable conjectures, found her out to be a serpent, a Lamia; and that all her furniture was, like Tantalus' gold described by Homer, no substance, but mere illusions. When she saw herself descried she wept, and desired Apollonius to be silent, but he would not be moved, and thereupon she, plate, house, and all that was in it, vanished in an instant ; many thousands took notice of this fact, for it was done in the midst of Greece." This tradition, a favourite with the poets, has its finest 76 The Poets and Nature. exposition in Keats' deathless verse. Mercury, roaming in the pinewood in search of a nymph whom he loves, hears a mournful voice bewailing itself, and searching among the bushes finds " A palpitating snake, Bright and cirque-couchant, in a dusky brake ; She was a gordian shape of dazzling hue, Vermilion-spotted, golden, green, and blue; Striped like a zebra, freckled like a pard, Eyed like a peacock, and all crimson barr'd ; And full of silver moons, that, as she breathed, Dissolved, or brighter shone, or interwreathed Their lustres with the gloomier tapestries So rainbow-sided, touch'd with miseries, She seemed at once some penanced lady-elf, Some demon's mistress, or the demon's self. Upon her crest she wore a wannish fire, Sprinkled with stars, like Ariadne's tiar ; Her head was serpent, but ah, bitter sweet ! She had a woman's mouth, with all its pearls complete. And for her eyes what could such eyes do there But weep, and weep, that they were born so fair, As Proserpine still weeps for her Sicilian air? Her throat was serpent, but the words she spake Came, as through bubbling honey, for love's sake." He asks the cause of its woe, and the Lamia then says that if Hermes will restore her to her human shape she will make his love who is invisible appear before him. The compact is faithfully adhered to. The god flies away with his nymph into " the green-recessed " woods, and the snake is alone. " Left to herself, the serpent now began To change ; her elfin blood in madness ran ; Her mouth foam'd, and the grass, therewith besprent, Wither'd at dew so sweet and virulent ; Her eyes in torture fix'd, and anguish drear, Hot, glazed, and wide, with lid- lashes all sear, Flash'd phosphor and sharp sparks, without one cooling tear. The colours all inflamed throughout her train, She writhed about, convulsed with scarlet pain ; A deep volcanian yellow took the place Of all her milder-mooned body's grace, Snakes in Tradition. 77 And, as the lava ravishes the mead, Spoilt all her silver mail, and golden brede : Made gloom of all her frecklings, streaks, and bars, Eclipsed her crescents, and lick'd up her stars : So that, in moments few, she was undrest Of all her sapphires, gems, and amethyst." Thereafter she vanishes, goes to Corinth, bewitches a youth of that city, who marries her. To the wedding feast, un- bidden, comes Apollonius the sage, who detects her, fixes his eye, " keen, cruel, penetrant, stinging," upon her. She implores him by gesture to look away. The bridegroom beseeches the sage to spare her. " Fooll" says Apollonius to the one, and then to the other, " Serpent ! " Upon this she gives a frightful scream and is gone " And Lysius" arms were empty of delight, As were his limbs of life, from that same night." CHAPTER V. THE POETS' SNAKES. IN folklore the snake has, I find, three distinct and different aspects. Only one of these the malignant aspect is recognised in verse. Elsewhere, however, it is very often met wiih as the faithful custodian of treasure, and nearly every country has its Serpent which guards the all-important tree of immortality and other secrets, or its dragonish thing that defends some priceless possession. The Greeks only fled from Athens when they heard that the snake of the city had deserted the Acropolis, and it is only a few years ago in this very nineteenth century of ours that the Nagas of India formally surrendered to British troops because their serpent oracle had escaped from its priests. For the snake is the universal guardian of the under world, whether we look for it in the diamond-lit caverns of Shesh in Hindostan, or under the ash Ygdrasil in Norway. In its second aspect it is benign, and emblematical of providential wisdom and a vigilant solicitude. So we find it in Anantas, the infinite, lending itself to the gods, that they might use its body for a rope, to be tied round the moun- tain of Meru when they churned the ocean ; as the bene- ficent rainbow of Africa; in the "feathered serpent" of South America that taught men religion and gave them the gift of wine ; in Hoa, the third person of the Babylonian trinity, that befriends the penitent. 78 The Poeis' Snakes. 79 Its third aspect, and the only one in which the poets regard it, is diabolical ; typifying a malignant darkness that is hurtful to man, and symbolising every wicked mood or motive, every misery, in human nature. "Slander's serpent mark," says one; and in Keats' tragedy of " Otho," the fair Auranthe and her brother who calumniate the Princess, are " those two vipers from whose jaws a deadly breath went forth to taint and blast the guileless lady." Envy is very often the motive for slander, so this also is another of the " serpentine obliquities of life." " Envy, with serpent eye, Marks each praise that soars on high." It is "snake-hung," "hissing," and (from the mystic pro- perties of serpents) u wizard " envy is armed with " venomed teeth." Personified as a hideous hag, it lives in gloomy dens and is " black envy," except when, as in the " Davideis," she is described as the direst fiend in Hell. Pride and envy are not unnaturally associated : " From what cause can envy spring? Or why embosom we a viper's sting ? 'Tis envy stings our darling passion Pride." Here the poetical diagnosis goes one step further back. A man's ideas of his own merit often make him resent the recognition of another's, whence, no doubt, slanderous depreciation. Being serpentine it is secret, whether lurking in some " cave," or cherished in the heart. 1 ' In his bosom secretly there lay An hateful snake." This, again, leads on to the fancy of man taking a sin to his heart for his own destruction, as in ^Esop's fable of the Countryman and the Viper : 8o The Poets and Nature. " He who in wild wood alleys roams, unthinking and unwise, And takes a serpent to his heart for beauty of its eyes, For splendour of its arching neck and glitter of its skin, Was scarcely such a dupe as I, in ignorance of sin." So Leyden's lines "cherished bosom-sin, Like nestling serpent gnawing the heart within," and "the green-eyed viper gnawing at my heart," or Shelley's ' ' Foul and cruel thoughts, which feed Upon the withering life within Like vipers on some poisonous weed." This is a curious passage, not only for the last line, which makes snakes vegetarian, but because the simile is so oddly at fault. The only association suggested, it seems to me, is between " withering " in the second line and " weed " in the third, but even that is too weak, while it is hardly sense to say that a thought, feeding on a withering life, resembles a viper eating a poisonous weed. The explanation, probably, is that the poet lapsed from his first image by what the wise call " some process of unconscious cerebration," his mind passing without intermediate expression in words from one to the other, and leaving, therefore, a gap without stepping- stones or bridge. In the first two lines Shelley, it may be, glances at a fiction which has never failed to attract poets, that of the snake living upon the vitals of its parents, as, for example, in Churchill, Dryden, and Marvell : 11 Oh ! my poor country ! Devour'd By vipers, which in thine own entrails bred, Prey on thy life, and with thy blood are fed, When children us'd their parents to dethrone, And gnaw their way, like vipers, to the crown." Against themselves their witnesses will swear, Till, viper-like, their mother-plot they tear, And suck for nutriment that bloody gore, Which was their principle of life before." These vipers have their mother's entrails torn, And would by force a second time be born." The Poets Snakes. 81 This idea, that the young vipers killed their mothers before coming into the world themselves, is one of great antiquity, and parricides, who were punished by the ancients by drowning, were sewn up in sacks, in which, as appropriate company for such criminals, some vipers had previously been put. Nor is the fiction by any means exploded, for in parts of England it is still believed that the adder which brings forth its young alive, and does not, like the harmless ' ; grass-snake," lay eggs is killed by her progeny. How this happens rural superstition can have only the vaguest notion, for another, which contradicts it, namely, that the young adders always take refuge inside their mother if suddenly startled, exists simultaneously with it. However, to return to the snakiness of human passions. Maternal anguish has her " torturing snakes." Remorse carries " a whip " (Southey) made of them, and can " dart poison through the conscious heart " (Akenside) : Super- stition is (in Shelley) a " hundred-forked " snake " insatiate ; l> Fierce debate (in Sackville) "deadly full of snaky heare;" Conscience is " a stinging worm," with the " viper fear " (Green), and the " adder of disgrace " (Dodd) is " an undying serpent" calling (Shelley) "her venomous brood to their nocturnal task." Error "serpent error wandering" of Milton has a u poisonous serpent head ; " and in Cowper " Sing, muse (if such a theme so dark, so long, May find a muse to grace it with a song), By what unseen and unsuspected arts The serpent Error twines round human hearts, Tell where she lurks, beneath what flowery shades, That not a glimpse of genuine light pervades, The poisoning, black, insinuating worm Successfully conceals her loathsome form." So, too, Pride the cause of error : " Though various foes against the truth combine, Pride above all opposes her design, F 82 The Poets and Nature. Pride of growth superior to the rest, The subtlest serpent with the loftiest crest, Swells at the thought, and, kindling into rage, Would hiss the cherub Mercy from the stage." Faith misplaced is in Shelley a " Python ; " it is a curious passage : " And Faith, the Python, undefeated, Even to its bloodstained altar-steps dragged on Her foul and wounded train, and men Were trampled and deceived again." And elsewhere from another standpoint the poet has the same sentiment : 11 Faith and Custom and low-though ted cares Like thunder-stricken dragons, for a space Left the torn human heart, their food and dwelling-place." " Faithlessness " has in Byron a serpent-fold a fine idea : " to find in Hope but the renewed caress, the serpent-fold of further faithlessness " and Coleridge associates the two : " tyrants' promises That can enchant the serpent treachery From Faith, its lurking hole in the heart." Jealousy is a " deaf adder : " " The serpent of the field, by art And spell, is won from harming ; But that which coils around the heart, Oh ! who hath power of charming?" The " Scorner " has in Heber a " serpent tongue." Hate and lawless Pleasure are snakes, and " in the soul Lurks sin, the Serpent with the fiery sting Of sorrow, rankling in the conscience deep." Avarice is a serpent (Savage), and so " strange fellowship through mutual hate " are Fear and Lust (Shelley). Care The Poets Snakes. 83 (Churchill) and Evil (Akenside) are vipers, while Ben Jonson adds to the list, in the following powerful lines, the faithless, the selfish man : " Look on the false and cunning man, that loves No person nor is loved : what ways he proves To gain upon his belly ; and at last Crushed into the snaky brakes that he had passed." Love, of course, is a serpent, in a score or two of poets : " A serpent nourish I under my wing, And now, of nature, 'ginneth it to sting." Nor does the breaking of the heart cure, but rather aggra- vate the evil : " I thought that this some remedy might prove ; But, oh ! the mighty serpent Love Broke, by this chance, in pieces small, In all still lived, and still it stung in all." Nor are even "the loves of the Angels" secure from reptilian intrusion : 1 ' When Love hath not a shrine so pure, So holy, but the serpent Sin, In moments even the most secure, Beneath his altar may glide in." The jealousy of rivals, and the pleasure of inflicting pain, and the pain of suffering it, suggests the snake to many poets. Thus Wyatt in his " Jealous Man : " " The wand'ring gadling in the summer tide That finds the adder with his reckless foot Starts not dismay'd so suddenly aside As jealous despite did, though there were no boot, When that he saw me sitting by her side That of my health is very crop and root. It pleased me then to have so fair a grace To sting the heart, that would have had my place." Among the classes of individuals specially colubrine are 84 The Poets and Nature. Critics (a particular aversion of poets), as in Goldsmith and Crabbe : " His wand's a modern author's pen ; The serpents round about it twined Denote him of the reptile kind, Denote the rage with which he writes, His frothy slaver venomed bites." Or " The serpent Critic's rising hiss." And Harlots so when Dalila leaves the crippled hero's presence with a taunt, the Chorus cry : " She's gone, a manifest serpent by her sting, Discovered in the end, till now concealed ; " and many others, down to the " unfortunate " of the London streets, against whom Mackay launches this exhortation to the "fool:" 11 A serpent, woman headed, With loose and floating hair, Beware, O fool ! how you touch it, Beware for your soul ! Beware ! 'Tis beautiful to look at As it rustles through the street, But its eyes, though bright as sunshine, Have the glow of hell's own heat. 'Twill murmur soft sweet music To draw you to its mesh, And coil about you fondly To feed upon your flesh ; Beware of this flaunting Gorgon With the snakes in her wavy hair ! Beware, O fool ! how you touch her, Beware for your soul, beware ! " So, too, in Savage, Lawyers : ' ' Not a gay serpent glittering to the eye, But more than serpent or than harlot sly, For lawyer-like, a fiend no wit can 'scape, The demon stands confessed in human shape." And in Coleridge's " Devil's Thoughts : " The Poets' Snakes. 85 " He saw a lawyer killing a viper On a dung heap beside his stable, And the devil smiled, for it put him in mind Of Cain and his brother Abel." Many families, alas ! appreciate all too sadly Byron's picture of that insidious wretch who, either calling herself the friend of one or other, comes between husband and wife, or parent and children, and working mischief under pretence of impartial advice, widens the breach with a show of healing it : " O serpent under femininitee Like to the serpent depe in helle ybound : O feined woman, all that may confound Vertue and innocence, thurgh thy malice, Is bred in thee, as nest of every vice." Chaucer. Or else as the friend of both, poisons each mutually against the other, carrying to and fro not the peace-making con- cessions, the timid beginnings of conciliation with which she is entrusted, but embittering hints and irritating suggestions that provoke recrimination, and further involve the already complicated difficulty. She found a rift which a single kiss might have closed ; she leaves a grief which passionate re- pentance, stretching from to-day to the tomb, cannot bridge. ' ' She rules the circle which she served before ; If mothers none know why before her quake ; If daughters dread her for the mother's sake ; If early habits those false links, which bind At times the loftiest to the meanest mind Have given her power too deeply to instil The angry essence of her deadly will ; If like a snake she steal within your walls, Till the black slime betray her as she crawls ; If like a viper to the heart she wind, And leave the venom there she did not find, What marvel that this hag of hatred works Eternal evil latent as she lurks, To make a Pandemonium where she dwells, And reign the Hecate of domestic hells ? Skill'd by a touch to deepen scandal's tints With all the kind mendacity of hints, 86 The Poets and Nature. While mingling truth with falsehoods, sneers with smiles, A thread of candour with a web of wiles ; A plain, blunt show of briefly-spoken seeming To hide her bloodless heart's soul-hardened scheming ; A lip of lies, a face formed to conceal, And, without feeling, mock at all who feel." So, too, in Cowper's "ancient prude" suggested by Hogarth's picture of morning we have Miss Bridget : 1 ' Of temper as envenomed as an asp, Censorious, and her every word a wasp," the meddlesome, scandal-mongering, reputation-tearing old maid, who is all too familiar in society : " Mark how the channels of her yellow blood Ooze to her skin and stagnate there to mud ; Cased like the centipede in saffron mail, Or darker greenness of the scorpion's scale For drawn from reptiles only may we trace Congenial colours in that soul or face." Fever "like a serpent crawling," "insidious Ague, serpent- like," " Gout half a snake," and other ills that flesh is heir to, share in the serpent reproach ; and both the north and the east wind, that cause so many of them in our chilly latitudes, have "serpents' fangs" and sting. The image of the river " stealing like a silver snake," "a glistering snake," that "through the grassy mead, winds on, now hidden, glittering now in light " (Southey), is sufficiently hackneyed, but it suggests to Wordsworth this excellent additional fancy : " A mightier river winds from realm to realm, And, like a serpent, shows his glittering back Bespotted with innumerable isles." And to Shelley this : " The glaciers creep Like snakes that watch their prey, from their far fountains Slow rolling on." Several other points in the natural economy of the tribe The Poets' Snakes. 87 afford the poets incessant opportunity for metaphor. Thus, the casting of their slough " So may my spirit cast, Serpent like, off the past. " Herbert. What shall I do ? Where go ? When I have cast this serpent-skin of woe." Keats. But time strips our illusions of their hue, And one by one in turn, some grand mistake Casts off its bright skin." Byron. Warmed by health as serpents in the Spring Aside their slough of indolence they fling." Crabbe, " They've tricks to cast their sins As easy as serpents do their skins That in a while grow out again." Butler. That the snake leaves a slimy track is a popular error, already noticed as accepted by poets. Slander and envy, therefore, are said to "befoul" as they go: the critic's "frothy slaver," the parasite's path "snake-marked," the traitor's "slimy clue," and other similar phrases have their source in the same fiction : "the trail of the serpent is over them all." The image of the snake lurking in the herbage is as old as grass itself. Our earliest poets, therefore, had it : " I know under the green the serpent how he lurks ; " and " Ware fro the serpent that so slily creepeth Under the grass, and stingeth subtelly." Equally ancient is the hiding of snakes beneath flowers, a fact of nature of which primitive humanity, shoeless and un- clad, had, no doubt, frequent sad experience. The "serpent in red roses hissing," is, therefore, ubquitous in verse. 8 8 The Poets and Nature. " Passions among pure thoughts hid Like serpents under flowerets sleeping." 1 Unwholesome weeds take root with precious flowers, The adder hisses where the sweet birds sing." " Oh, in thy truth secure, thy virtue bold, Beware the poison in the cup of gold, The asp among the flowers." " Distrust The vain pretence ; the smiles that harbour grief As lurks the serpent deep in flow'rs enwreath'd." "See ! how vain pleasures sting the lips they kiss, How asps are hid beneath the bowers of bliss." Thence the idea of treason " Gaunt as a serpent : " " Right as a serpent hideth him under floures, 'Til he may see his time for to bite," says Chaucer, or, as Shenstone puts the same thought : " My tend'rest glances but the precious flow'rs That shade the viper while she plots her wound. ' And so (as in Churchill) to treason particular : "Those vipers to their king, Who smooth their looks and flatter whilst they sing." "Thus treason works ere traitors be espied, Who sees the lurking serpent." In Shelley the hurricane and lightning are both snakes, and in several poets, flame coiling, wreathing, darting, hissing, fork-tongued is a snake. " The hurricane came from the west and passed on By the path of the gate of the eastern sun, Transversely dividing the stream of the storm ; As an arrowy serpent pursuing the form Of an elephant, bursts through the brakes of the waste." In Darwin the great sea-worm l is blue : 1 The sea-snake is fully referred to in later pages. P. R. The Poets' Snakes. 89 " Two serpent-forms incumbent on the main, Lashing the white waves, with redundant train, Arch'd their blue necks, and shook their tow'ring crests And plough'd their foamy way with speckled breasts ; Then, darting fierce amid the affrighted throngs, Rolled their red eyes, and shot their forked tongues." This cerulean snake is a recurrent figure. Science knows more than one " blue " snake, though they are not all really such. Who, for instance, that has ever seen one, would think of calling the "Korait" " caruhus" ? Science, how- ever, calls the dull, lead-coloured crow of India " splendens. " So let it pass. The poets, however, have "blue" snakes which they mean to be really blue. Many have water-snakes of this colour for Virgil had such. Darwin, Mary Howitt, and Shelley have, with a natural license, blue sea-snakes. Others have land reptiles of the same colour. Thus in Heber's admirable rendering of Pindar's address to Agesias of Syracuse : " Two scaly snakes of azure hue Watched o'er his helpless infancy ; And, rifled from the mountain bee, Bare on their forky tongues a harmless honey-dew." King gives Megaera the Fury a ringlet of blue snakes, and in Congreve the Gorgon's headdress of vipers is "blue as the vault." While on this subject, it is very curious that the poets should perpetually speak of the "coronal" of snakes what- ever they may mean by it. Yet there is a whole genus scientifically named "coronellinse." CHAPTER VI. "THE TUNEFUL FROG." " From the hay-cock's moistened heaps Startled frogs take vaunting leaps ; And along the drewen mead, Jumping travellers they proceed ; Quick the dewy grass divides, Moistening sweet their speckled sides ; From the grass or flowret's cup Quick the dew-drop bounces up." Clare. " A LONG line is run to make a frog " by which Sir Thomas Browne pleasantly expresses his admiration of the series of metamorphoses by which the frog arrives at complete indi- viduality. First of all, that " lentous and transparent body," full of "little conglobulations," which we call spawn : " Ere yet with wavy tail the tadpole swims, Breathes with new lungs, or tries his nascent limbs, Her countless shoals the amphibious frog forsakes, And living islands float upon the lakes." And then the " porwigle " or " tadpole," all tail and head. By-and-by the thing sprouts two hind legs, still keeping its long caudal appendage. ' ' So still the tadpole cleaves the watery vale With balanc'd fin and undulating tail." Next it grows its fore-legs, and swims about as a long-tailed froglet. Then we see it sitting on the bank with only a short stumpy tail. Return two days later, and, lo ! the tail has gone altogether, and a tiny "frog" is there. The Timeful Frog. 9 1 " New lungs and limbs proclaim his second birth, Breathe the dry air, and leap upon the earth." "Frogs and toads and all the tadpole train" are un- popular with the poets. They dislike their appearance and detest their voice. They remember, too, against them the description in Holy Writ of " the croaking nuisance " of Egyptian chastisement : 1 ' The river yet gave one instruction more, And from the rotting fish and uncococted gore, Which was but water just before, A loathsome host was quickly made That scal'd the banks, and with loud noise Did all the countryside invade, As Nilus when he quits his sacred bed (But like a friend he visits all the lands) With welcome presents in his hands. So did this living tide the fields o'erspread. In vain th' alarmed country cries To kill their noisome enemies ; From th' unexhausted source still new recruits arise. Nor does the earth these greedy troops suffice ; The towns and houses they possess, The temples and the palaces, Nor Pharaoh nor his gods they fear, Both their importune croakings hear ; Unsatiate yet, they mount up high'r, Where never sun-born frog durst to aspire, And in the silken beds their slimy members place, A luxury unknown before to all the watr'y race." Cowley. In the New Testament the batrachian folk are only once mentioned. " And I saw," says St. John in the Revelation, " three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the Beast, and out of the mouth of the False Prophet." In the Old they recur three times, and always in the same association, as the instrument of Osirtesen's humbling : ' ' That croaked the Jews From Pharaoh's brick-kilns loose" on the day when his borders were smitten with frogs 92 The Poets and Nature. "that loathed invasion," as Milton calls it which "the river brought forth abundantly." 1 ' A race obscene Spawned in the muddy beds of Nile, Polluting Egypt. Gardens, fields, and plains Were covered with the pest. The trees were filled, The croaking nuisance lurked in every nook ; Nor palaces, nor even chambers 'scaped ; And the land stank, so numerous was the fry." Cowper. With this point of high prescription, sanctified by a supreme authority, the poets are accurately well content, and the frog remains therefore "loathsome." " Puffing" frog, " dew-sipping," " sly-jumping," are found among the more curious epithets applied to the animal. But " speckled," " hoarse," and " slimy " are the more common. Yet if more poets had been familiar with zoology they might have fairly revelled in the beauties and significances of the frog-world. Of the strange chain of metamorphoses by which the '' porwigle " laboriously graduates in maturity I have already spoken, but what shall we say of the Pipa that hatches her young out of dimples upon her back? She has, as it were, a false skin, and under this are little pits, in each of which an egg germinates. By-and-by they hatch. The young ones creep out through the upper skin on to the mother's back, and hop off to the ground. She then casts her old skin and starts afresh. Or of the Alyatis, where the husbands share with their wives in a fair and manly way the inconveniences of reproduction, and "lie in," so to speak, of one half the eggs while the mother takes charge of the other half? Or of that Hyla whose eggs the male takes up in its paws and packs away comfortably into a pouch on the mother's back, where they hatch ? Were the responsibilities of parents ever more conscien- tiously undertaken? Then, too, the originality of such proceedings ! The poor things have got neither " dens " nor " nests," and they refuse to leave their eggs lying about, as The Tuneful Frog. 93 some things do, at the mercy of the spoiler. So they always carry them with them, the father dividing the work with the mother. This is surely admirable. Yet, as Professor Martin Duncan says, " Frogs have little to thank humanity for." Children tease them, ignorant adults persecute them. Men of science delight in microscopical and galvanic experi- ments with them. Birds and beasts and fish and snakes are perpetually hunting them. In the water and out of it they are for ever under pursuit. Nor does much sympathy attach to them in their afflictions because they are only frogs. Yet if regard attaches, as it certainly should do, to that which is eminently edible, we owe some consideration to this creature. It is particularly good eating, and by the draining and cultivation of the country, we have lost a side-dish which the Continent and America more judiciously appreciate. Again, if respect is due to that which is useful, the utmost deference should be shown to frogs and toads, who are the most relentless enemies of insects injurious to plants, and a terror to all evil-doers in gardens and orchards. Is admiration the prerogative of beauty ? Then where can it be better bestowed than on the pretty green and red frogs of South Africa, or the cornfield frog of Carolina, which is dove-colour above and silver below, or the exquisite tree- frogs, grass green and gold as a rule, but in Central America sky-blue above and rose-pink beneath? They are all living gems, and science calls them by pretty names aurea, cceruleus, ornatus, pulcher, and elegans. Even in mere variety there is a pleasant virtue : for this we load the vari- able chrysanthemum with compliments. Yet among the frogs and toads there is a diversity almost as bold and quaint as amongst the ochids, while for positive beauty they are, some of them, unsurpassed. As for their voice, the poets have much excuse for disapproval. " Gossips are frogs they drink and talk." 94 The Poets and Nature. I have myself wondered that any one could ever have spoken with admiration of their song, and am not surprised that the Abderites should have been driven from their homes by the intolerable monotony of the batrachian chorus. How it exasperated Bacchus on his way to Hades that " Brekekex coax coax, brekekekex coax coax," of the persistent multitude ! In Menu's " After-world " there are twenty-one purgatories. One of them is filled with mud ; and if the mud be filled with frogs, I think I would rather be consigned to any one of the other twenty; albeit, I know that Indra's august abode is enlivened, according to Hindoo legend, by "the harmonious voices of the black bee and the frog." So, too, in Aristophanes, Charon, laughing, says 1 ' You shall hear most delightful melodies as soon as you lay-to at your oars. From whom ? From swans the frogs wondrous ones." And the frogs have much to say in their own praise : " Marshy offspring of the fountains we, let us raise our voices in harmonious hymn brekekekex in sweet-sounding song coax coax. Thus sung we in the marshes by the Acropolis, making festal the rites of Nisaean Bacchus. Brekekekex coax coax. The Muses of the beautiful lyre love us coax coax and so does horn-footed Pan who pipes upon the reed brekekekex and Apollo, the sweet harper brekekekex coax coax. So let us sing and leap, and leap and sing again, through galingal and sedge, chanting as we dive our choral strains to the music of breaking bubbles brekekekex coax coax" Other poets, however, are not of Pan's opinion, nor of Apollo's. They recognise no harmony in the voice of the batrachians. Southey quotes it as the extreme antithesis of melody. Spenser, in his " Epithalamium," warns them off The Tuneful Frog. 95 11 Ne let th' unpleasant quyre of frogs still croking Make us to wish theyr choking." "Dutch nightingales" is a popular nickname of these loquacious amphibians, and Allan Ramsay derisively rallies the Hollanders upon their songsters. Elegant Paris, however, has a better claim to these mud- larks, as I may call them. For three frogs once formed the civic device of Lutetia "the mud-land " ' ' Where stagnant pools and quaking bogs Swarmed, croaked, and crawled with hordes of frogs ; " but in Clovis' time the grenouille was " miraculously " trans- figured into the fleur-de-lis, one product of the marshes thus supplanting the other upon the banner and shield of France. The truth, perhaps, is that about that time our neighbours discovered what excellent eating their national device was, and not caring to emblazon that which they cooked, they promoted the frog from their oriflamme to their stew-pans. The Moon-folk, however, had anticipated them, for, so Lucian avers, " they used but one kind of food." " There are," he says, " great multitudes of frogs flying about in the air ; these they catch, and, lighting a fire, cook them upon the coals ; and while the frogs are a-cooking they sit round the fire, just as men sit round a table and swallow the smoke, thinking it indeed to be the finest thing in the world." " Soulless " is a good epithet (of Mackay's) for the croak of the creature, as any one who has listened long to their un- meaning clamour will confess, but I like Moore's humorous rendering of its significance none the less : ' ' Those frogs whose legs a barbarous cook Cut off, and left the frogs in the brook To cry all night, till life's last dregs, ' Give us our legs Give us our legs.' " Any translation of the sound that makes sense of it com- gb The Poets and Nature. mends itself to me. For I should be glad to be convinced that the moist and garrulous things had souls. They have got calves to their legs, a feature which, if I am not wrong, no other animal but man possesses. Yet, when in company, they have a wide range of ex- pression from the crisp, shrill chirrup of the tree-frogs, to the loud snore of the " Cambridge nightingales." The multi- tudes of the Arkansas swamps have a nasal metallic <; yank- yank," as different as possible from the deep "owk-owk" of the French frogs. The fire-bellied toad has a clear, reso- nant voice, the bull-frog a profoundly sonorous one. The natter-jack cries "gloo-gloo," the green toad " may-may," while, for the noises of the rest, the frog-chorus of Aristo- phanes, already quoted, renders them faithfully enough by brekekekex and coax coax. Again and again in legends they are struck dumb ; now by saints for disturbing devotions, and now by nymphs for defiling fountains. On the other hand, men are punished by being made to croak As when those hinds that were transformed to frogs Railed at Latona's twin- born progeny." In Syriapha, blessed isle, the frogs were voiceless ; and it is a fact that the illustrious Meoenas bore a frog for his device as an emblem of taciturnity, borrowed from those batrachians on the shores of the yEgean, who " never croak in their own marshes," according to ^Elian. " Mute the same is, and never croaketh," saith Pliny. Emblematic, therefore, of silence and secrecy, qualites for which Augustus held Mecsenas in such respect and favour. The " bull-frog," which I take to be a corruption of bell- frog, let philologists say what they like, is not an aversion of the poets. It is "deep-mouthed and doubly harsh" in Byron, and Faber has The Tuneful Frog. 97 1 ' Beneath thy feet A lonely bell-frog from the reedy fosse Rang his distinct and melancholy fall, But harshly to thy travel- wearied mind Most soothingly attuned." There ought to be nothing laughable about the creature's voice, but I confess I have laughed consumedly at its pompous gravity ; and a friend once told me how a love- making scene, which both the lady concerned and he meant to be most serious, was made utterly ridiculous, in consequence of a bull-frog chiming in most inopportunely, whenever sentiment demanded silence, or, at most, only a nightingale's song. However, the frog was,. after all, a true friend, for the marriage, which eventually followed their laughing betrothal, has been a happy one, owing, so they say, to " that old bull-frog " having stopped them both from committing themselves and each other to " a lot of bosh " at the commencement. In fairy-stories the frog is perpetually recurring. Its shape is popularly held in aversion, so nothing could be more suitable for the utmost degradation of enchanted princesses and princes. Ivan the Tsar's son has to marry a frog who eventuates blissfully in a very Helen of personal charms. In Grimm, the exquisite princess has to wed a frog which turns into an adorable prince. When the lovely maiden is to be transformed into an odious object, tonds fall from her mouth when she speaks. Yet in folk-lore, frogs are uniformly beneficent. One brings the Queen her Rose-briar daughter ; another, a fat old frog, makes Dumm- ling's fortune for him. So, too, are the toads. They are always bringing good luck to children, or treasures (as "the toad with the crooked leg "did) to princesses. As the metamorphoses of human beings, they are intended to be repulsive. In their own persons they are benign. As the familiars of witches the paddocks had a bad name G 98 The Poets and Nature. " I went to the toad that breeds under the wall ; I charmed him out, he came to my call. I scratched out the eyes of the owl before ; I tore the bat's wing what would you have more ? " But, like Robin Goodfellow, who was also the companion of hobgoblins and all manner of Serene Naughtinesses, they exercised their power with consideration and benevolence. Wordsworth regards the frog as a sort of amphibian Mark Tapley, and sees in the creature jumping about on a wet day a moral of cheerfulness under depressing circumstances, and bids his readers " Learn from him to find a reason For a light heart in a dull season." But considering that Wordsworth professed an exceptional sympathy with nature, it is curious that he should have missed sense by such a distance. Wet days are, of course, the frog's gayest weather ; then it picnics, flirts, puffs out, is happiest. As a matter of fact, Wordsworth knew this very well. " On shore the coming deluge draws the race Of reptiles from their haunts, in mead and grove, Concealed the puffing frog, the horned snail, And all the species of the slimy tribes." Grahame. Indeed, in myth, they are often clouds and pluvial. Their croaking is the rain signal. They are "rain-desiring," so " rain-heralding," and thus come to be " rain-compelling." Of the actual frogs of story the poets have three groups. There are first those " good ^Esop's frogs " that asked for a king " Thus kings were first invented, and thus kings Were burnished into heroes, and became The arbiters of this terraqueous swamp, Storks among frogs." and afterwards changed the dynasty The Tuneful Frog. 99 " Loud thunder to its bottom shook the bog, And the hoarse nation croaked 'God save King Log.' " From the same delightful source comes that other that would have her children know that their mother could make her- self "so big as anything" " And thus the reptile sits Enlarging till she splits." And also those, the "much-complaining" frogs, that pre- sumptuously entertained the idea of punishing the Sun for drying up their mud. Next, in frequency of mention, are the pugnacious frogs of the classics that did battle with the mice, where " he who inflates the cheek" warred with the " cheese-nibbler ; " and those others who went, as Beattie sings, to battle against the cranes : /'And there the frog, a scene full sad to see, Shorn of one leg, slow sprawled along on three. He vaults no more with vigorous hops on high, But mourns in hoarsest croaks his destiny." The third group are those of Holy Writ, to which I have already referred. CHAPTER VII. "THE LOATHED PADDOCKS' " Would 1 st thou think that toads or snakes or efts Could e'er be beautiful?" ^Shelley, "INASMUCH," says De Gubernatis, "as the toad is a form proper to the demon, it is feared and hunted ; inasmuch as, on the contrary, it is considered as a diabolical form imposed upon a divine or princely being, it is respected and venerated as a sacred animal." In poetry, the toad has only one, the " loathed " aspect ; although in popular estimation in all countries it has both a sinister and a benign. It is a lucky omen if one crosses the path of a wedding party bound for the church. Did not St. Patrick all pictures to the contrary notwithstanding spare them when he drummed "the vermin" out of Ireland? Just as in Cornwall a man may not shoot a raven lest he should kill King Arthur unawares, so in Tuscany, you may not hurt a toad lest you should do a mischief to some young princess or heroine who has been cruelly transformed into that shape, and who is only waiting for the beautiful prince to come, when the maiden will resume her charms and " live happily ever afterwards." In the folk-tale of some countries, the Beast who marries Beauty is a toad, and many stories substitute this creature for the frog in such stones as where, benign and amiable, it fetches rings up for sultans' sons The L,o tithed Paddock*, ^ 101 and balls for kings' daughters? ""Medicinally, 'tKe u paddock had once a high value for cancer, and in Europe it is still worn on the person as a charm against poisons and the plague. On occasion, too, it was a potent beast. For if it found a cock's egg and hatched it, the result was a cockatrice, a fearsome thing, which of its own accord grew a crown on its head and so became a basilisk, and could kill by merely looking. A very notable worm indeed, and mo.^t reverend, was " this crowned asp." Moreover, the toad, " Though ugly, Wears yet a precious jewel in its head." In that very fascinating work, " The Natural History of Gems," 1 a chapter is devoted to those "stones of virtue," which were supposed in olden times to have been produced by, or found inside of, beasts, birds, fishes, and reptiles such as the hyaena, which, placed under the tongue, con- ferred the gift of prophecy, and the marvellous "lynx-stone ; " the grass-green chloritis, found only in wagtails, and the alectoria, a crystal formed inside cocks; the cinaedia, developed in the head of the fish so called ; the draconite, dreadfully lodged in snakes, and the famous " batrachite " or " bufonite " the " toad-stone." This last was said to be of three kinds, one yellow and green "like a frog," the second black, the third red and black. This tradition being handed down to mediaeval fancies resulted in the toad being credited with "a jewel in its head," which was variously called "borax," " nosa," and "crapodinus." " The unwieldy Toad That crawls from his secure abode Within the mossy garden wall When evening dews began to fall, 1 By C. W. King, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. IO2 o c * ^Fhe. Poets