154 4 D83s «(» 9 4 4 7 Drinkwater Some Contributions to the English Antholo^J'' THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES THE BRITISH ACADEMY WARTON LECTURE ON ENGLISH POETRY XTTI Some Contributions to the English Anthology (With special reference to the Seventeenth Century) By John Drinkwater [From the Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. A"\ London INililished for the British Academy By Humphrey Milfonl, Oxford University Press Amcii Corner, E.C. Price Give Shilling net WARTON LECTURE ON ENGLISH POETRV XIII 803IE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ENGLISH ANTHOLOGY (WITH SPECIAL REFKllEXCE TO THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY) Bv JOHN DRINKWATER Read Fel)ruary 23, 1922 ' He may at least be sure of a place in the anthologies of the future "" is a reviewer's phrase that has brought comfort, I suppose, to a good many poets who have not hoped for the larger things of fame. And yet it is stiange, for all the diligence of the compilers, to find how iiianv good poets pass with their death into what it would seem may be, but for some lucky accident, permanent oblivion. Herrick publishes his Hespendes in Ki-iJS, and no further edition of what is probably the greatest single volume of lyrics in the language is called for until 1810, when John Nott of Bristol, M.D., comes forward with Select Poem.s enibelli.died with ( ccasional Remarks. Andrew Marvell dies unpublished, but, a little more fortimate in his posthumous fame, appears in a handsome little folio in 1G81, wjiich is followed by a new edition forty-Hve years later, by another fifty years later still, and then he waits nearly another hundred years for the almost universal industry of Dr. Grosart. JSo good a poet as Richard Corbet, with his Farewell Rewards and Fair'us, appears first in HiiT, then again in a surreptitious edition in 1648, and then for a third time in 1()72. In 1807 he is rediscovered by Octavius Gil(;hrist, and after that he remains unedited until our own time; while a poet such as Rochester, at his l)est a lyrist that none of them can surpass, has never from the iK'ginning had his text or liis canon rescued from confusion.' These j)oets are among those who, even in long [K-riods of public Tieglcct, ' .Siiicf writiiijf tlii^, I am gl.ul t<» set- that Mr. .M(iiit;ii;n Snmriicii i- ciif.^a^cfl r)i) an filitioii of KoclieHtcr. XIII K 86025.'i 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY have never wholly escaped the attention of scholars or occasional inclusion in the miscellanies, but the absence of any readily accessible editions of their works has meant that over and over again one student or compiler has merely relied for his knowledge or selection upon one or two poems singled out by his predecessors, and this even when the w^ork in hand has been a serious study and not merely a piece of easy book-compiling. The ordinary hack anthologist need not be considered. In nearly every case he simply steals, more or less at haphazard, from the patient labours of honester men than himself. But it is remark- able how, if we take our view of a poet from, say, ten standard English anthologies, we may easily get a hopelessly inadequate view of his work. To take two examples. Richard Barnefield is a name at least known to every reader who is familiar at all with English poetry. His original editions are practically unprocurable, there being in each case perhaps but three or four known copies, while the Roxborough reprint is by no means common, and otherwise the ordinary reader is cut off from access to the full texts. Looking at these ten anthologies, The Golden Treasury, The Oxford Book of English Verse, ^\'^ard"'s English Poets, Beeching's Paradise of English Poetry, Mrs. MeynelPs Flower of the Mind, Sir Arthur Quiller Couch's Golden Pomp, Henley's English Lyrics, Mr. Massingham's Seventeenth Century English Vei'se, Mr. Braithwaite's Elizabethan Verse, and, last, the frankly popular but very comprehensive Book of English Poetry published by Messrs. Jack, we get this result. Mr. Massingham omits Barnefield altogether, as he does not come within his period; of the other nine, seven give The Nightingale alone, while the other two give The Nightingale and Jf Music and Szvcet Poetry Agree, and Ward adds one other sonnet. This means that to all intents and purposes Barnefield is known to nearly the whole English poetry reading public by one poem, and that, charming as it is, not in my opinion his best. As an example of the quality which is entirely unknown to the general reader, and almost so to the scholar, let me quote two of Barnefield's pieces from Poems in Divers Hiimors published by John Jaggard in 1598 : AN EPITAPH UPON THE DEATH OF HIS AUNT, MISTRESSE ELIZA BB:TH SKRYMSHER Loe here beholde the certaine Ende, of euery lining wight: No Creature is secure from Death, for Death will haue his Right. He spareth none : both rich and poore, both young and olde must die ; So fraile is flesh, so short is Life, so sure Mortalitie. When first the Bodye Hues to Life, the soule first dies to sinne : And they that loose this earthly Life, a heavenly Life shall winne. CONTUIBUTIONS TO THE ENGLISH ANTHOLOGY 3 It" thev Hue well: as well she liv'tl, that lyeth \'iKler heere ; Whoso Vertuous Life to all the Worlcle, most plainly did appeere. Good to the poore, friend to the rieh, and toe to no Degree : A Pn sident of modest Life, and peerelesse Chastitie. Who lolling more, Wlio more belov"d, of eucrie honest mvnde ? Who more to Ilospitalitie, and Clemeneie inclinde Then she ? that being buried here, lyes wrapt in Earth below : From whence wee came, to whom wee must, and bee as shee is now, A Clodd of Clay : though her pure soule in endlesse Blisse doeth rest ; loving all loy, the Place of Peace, prepared for the blest : ^Vhere holy Angells sit and sing, before the King of Kings ; Not mynding worldly Vanities, but onely heavenly Things. Vnto which lov, Vnto which Blisse, Vnto which Place of Pleasure, (jod graunt that wee may come at last, finioy that heauenly Treasure. AN'hich to obtaine, to Hue as shee hath done let us endeuor ; That we may hue with Christ liimselfe (above) that Hues for ever. A COMPARISON OF THK LIFE OF MAN Mans life is well compared to a feast, Eurnisht with choice of all Varietie : To it comes Tyme ; and as a bidden guest Hee sets him downe, in Pompe and Maiestie ; The three-folde Age of Man, the Waiters bee. Then with an earthen voyder (made of clay) Comes Death, Sc takes the table clean away. Mv other example is James Shirley. All ten anthologists give us The Glories of our Blood and State, with the exception of Mr. Massingham, who omits it on the plea that it is too well known for inclusion, six add Victorious Men of Earth No More, four add the hymn O Fly inij Soul, three You Virgins That Did Late Despair^ two The Garden, while Ward and Mr. Massingham e;.ch add one individual selection This means that Shirley's total representation in ten serious anthologies is by seven poems, four of which only make seven appearances between them. Of these seven j)oems, four are taken from the Plavs or Mascpies, and only three, which three make l)ut six appearances ix-'twcen them, are taken from Shirley's principal lyric production, the Poems of Ib'tG, a volume of whicii the luturc aiitiiologiht might take further notice. Here is a sond)rc but linelv lyrical fragment to tempt him : rilK I'ASSINC; MKLL Hark, liow ciiimes the Passing bell, There's no musick to a knell; All the otiier sounds we heai-, I'latter, and but clu-at otn* car. 4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY This doth put us still in mind That our flesh must be resign''d, And a general silence made, The world be muffled in a shade ; He that on his pillow lies Tear-enbalmed before he dies. Carries like a sheep his life, To meet the sacrificer's knife, And for eternity is prest. Sad Bell- weather to the rest. It is true that in some cases the anthologist could plead that in following the general choice he was also representing the poet at his indisputable best. If we want to know what, say, Lovelace and Waller were as poets, we must read Tell me not. Sweet, I am iinkhid, and When Love with uncotifined Wings, and Go lovely Rose, and it would be an affectation for the compiler to pretend that any other choice could be within reasonable distance of matching these. But with poets like Barnefield and Shirley, and there are many of them, it is another matter. And we find over and over again even first-rate writers whose general reputations rest on two or three well-known pieces because the compilers of anthologies have failed to familarize themselves with the original sources. And if this is so with poets who, like Shirley, because of the general volume of their w'ork, cannot escape some attention, what is likely to happen to those less fortunate, and doubtless on the whole less admirable ones, who, publishing like Herrick perhaps in 1648, have no Dr. Nott in 1810 nor Dr. Grosart in 1870. It is as a slight contribution to the answer to this question that the present paper is offered. The history of English poetry, of which, I suppose, the father may be said to be Thomas Warton, is as likely as other histories always to remain incomplete. The explorer of the by- ways of English verse knows how often he can defeat the indices of even so learned and exhaustive scholars as Doctors Courthope and Saintsbury. This paper makes no pretence to learning of the standard which modern editorship has made prevalent at every seat of learning in the country. The minutiae of research into questions of texts and sources may be said to have become a special profession requiring a most exact and arduous training. That is not my job. I come before you as the most amateur of scholars, but, having all my life read English poetry as widely as I could, I have for some time amused myself by collecting any books of English verse which bore unfamiliar, or, better still, unknown names. In offering a garland from these little books, mostly of the seventeenth century, while I cannot claim CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ENGLISH ANTHOLOGY 5 tliat in every case the poet in (juestion is one unknown even to the most diligent student. I am sure that they all have so small a reputa- tion through the body of their work as to amount to nothing at all, and as a group they may be said, with but little exaggeration, to have escaped the antliologists altogether. For some time I had intended to make a small anthology toveriui'- this trround mvself, but then I realized that for the do/en or twenty discoveries that I might n)ake there were ten tiines as manv that I should miss, and it seemed better in this wav to make a few notes iu the hope that other readers miglit from time to time do the same thing, until something really compre- hensive in the way of material might be ready for the perfect compiler when he arrives. In most cases these poets are not even knowu to the historians, and their onlv monument is inclusion in such publications as the splendid Grolicr Club bibliograjihy, mention in which is a guarantee to the bookseller rather than to the critic, although it should be said that though that pul^lication is clearly bibliographical in intention, it had the great advantage of being supervised by Mr. Beverly Chew, who is not only a most distinguished collector but also a man of the finest literary taste and judginent. With one of my unknown poets, John Colloj), I have already dealt at length in a separate paper. He happens to be a poet whose little book, Poex'ia Rcdivivci, 1656, is of considerable quality throughout, whereas in manv cases one finds only a snatch here and there which merits remembrance : The house is swept A\'hich sin so long foul kept : The peny 's found for which the loser wept. And purgM with tears, God's Image re-appears. The peny truly shews whose stamp it bears. Colloj) could write so, and often, but the ])aper I'eferred to contains a good many examples of his work, and he need not be considered further here. I now propose to present my gatherings with as little in the wav of design as may be found in the occasional note-book. In 1662 there appeared a volume entitled Flamma sine Funio : or Poems -ic'ithont Fict'ion.s^ bv It. W., being a collection of miscellaneous [joems including at the end J Lookiu IVoiii flic 1 Icber Collection and contiiins a note in Heber\ writinir to the ellcct that 11. ^^^, who as we le.'irn from fhc signed Preface was Rowland Watkvns, was jiiinister 6 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY of Baru in Brecknockshire. He is unknown bo Corser, Collins, and Courthope, but he is to be found in the Bibliotheca Anglo -Poetica. So far as I can discover, except for occasional mention in a catalogue, his is to-day an entirely dead name, and I have discovered no critical reference to him. Here are a few examples of his work : THE BIBLE Much books I have perus'd, but I protest Of books the sacred Bible is the best. Some books may nmch of humane Learning boast But here's the Language of the Holy Ghost, Hence we draw living water, here we do (Observe the Patriarchs lives, and doctrine too : Here Christ himself directs us how to pray, And to the Gate of Heaven chalks the way. Here is the salve, which gives the blind their sight, All darknesse to expel, here is the light : Here is strong meat for men ; and milk to feed The weaker babes, which more perfection need ; Cast off erroneous pamphlets, wanton rhymes. All feigned books of love ; which cheat the times ; And read this book of life ; those shall appear With Christ in Heaven which are written here. THE WEDDING GARMENT Faith is the wedding garment, lind within, With love, without foul spots, or staines of sin. Humility is the most decent lace, And patient hope, which doth this garment grace. Without this royal robe no guest is fit To sup, or at the Lords own table sit. THE WISH Hoc est summum inei, caputque voti ; A little house, a quiet wife. Sufficient food to nourish life. Most perfect health, and free from harm, Convenient cloths to keep me warm. The liberty of foot, and mind. And grace the ways of God to find. This is the summe of my desire, Until I come unto heavens quire. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ENGLISH ANTHOLOGY 7 li'ON rilK FAIR AM) \ IMinors (iENTLEWOAFAN MRS. M. S. I'llAT LAN SING EXCKLLENTLV Gratior est virtus venieiis o corporo pulcliro. When first I did this \'ir()n!e Ship-master make's fore-split tiie Probe Of Nature's secrets, and so bring to view Land to make up a perfect earthly Globe, Which Drake nor Kit Columbus never knew : Yet, as in the great world, so in his own. He nuist confers there's yet much land unknown. The heart's a Sea for depth, like Sodom-lake, Dead, thick, and gross; in it will sink no good: Th" hearts land's unknown; wherein what monsters make Their hides and dens, few yet have understood. The centre may be purest earth ; yet th"' heart The bodies centre \s the corru[)ter part. Our heart-strings arc the cords of vanity; Their caverns are the devil's lurking-holes; No fit Triangle for tlic Trinity ; All liabitation more fit for moles: Their cauls the veils of dauui'd Ilxpocrisie. Thus is sunrd up man's wretched .Majestie. 5 If thus the Sun within our (irinainen!. Into a Meteor de