SEATTLE CHILDREN IN SCHOOL AND IN INDUSTRY WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOB INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE SCHOOL SYSTEM AND FOR DECREASING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC WASTE INCI- DENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT OF CHILDREN 14 to 18 YEARS OF AGE BY Anna Y. Reed, Ph. D. Published by the Board of School Directors Seattle, Washington January, 1915 printers Lowman & Hanford Co. SEATTLE, WASH. CONTENTS. Pa.?e Letters of Transmittal 5-8 Facts About Seattle 9-11 Sources of Information and Methods of Investigation.... 12-13 Section I.— Children Who Left School, 1913-1914 15-24 Number of Children Who Left 17 Reasons for Leaving 18-20 First Positions 20-22 Changes in Position 22-23 Initial Wage 23 Periods of Unemployment 23-24 Section II. — School Leaving and Labor Permits 25-40 Classification of Permits 27-29 Influence of Nationality 30 Size of Families and Head of Family ' 31 Retardation of Working Children 31-33 Occupation of Parents 33 Economic Status of Family 34-40 (1) School Leaving Permits and Economic Pressure 34-38 (2) Labor Permits and Economic Pressure 38-40 Section III. — Educational and Occupational Experience of Boys and Girls up to 21 Years Who Have Been Out of School from One to Five Years 41-77 Reasons for Leaving 43-44 Number of Positions 45 Retardation 46-47 First Positions and Changes in Positions 47-59 Handicaps in Securing Promotions 59 Suggestions for the School System 59-61 Supplemental Education 61-73 Initial and Final Wage - 73-77 Section IV. — Minimum Wage and Vocational Efficiency 78-90 Section V. — State School and Child Labor Laws and the Making of Unemployables 91-95 Section VI. — Conclusions and Recommendations 96-103 362138 LIST OF TABLES. Table I. << II. " III. (< IV. " V. " VI. VII. Table VIII. << IX. " X. " XI. " XII. <( XIII. « XIV. <« i XV. " XVI. << XVII. <« XVIII. \„ XIX. <( XX. << XXI. <« XXII. * Table XXIII. " XXIV. <« XXV. " XXVI. " XXVII. << XXVIII. «< XXIX. " XXX. " XXXI. <« XXXII. XX. Child's Wage In Relation to Resources — Two Hundred Seventy-one Labor Permits. Weekly Per Capita, Less Child's Wage Child's Average Wage Child's Wage Only $1 or Less $1-2 $2-3 Over 3 Average Owners. . Renters. 12 14 4 12 20 24 24 50 45 76 $3.00 3.07 $6.60 5.63 Total... 26 16 44 74 121 Seattle Children in School and in Industry. 39 Table XXI. Bent in Relation to Resources — One Hundred Sixty-six I^abor Permits. Weekly Rent Number of Families Average Rent Per Family Per Week Average Income Per Family Percentage of Rent of Income $1.25 4 76 60 26 $1.25-2.50 $2.50-3.75 Over $3.75 $3.80 $19.00 20% Table XXII. Summary of Three Hundred Twenty-nine Labor and School Leaving- Permits. Plass of SQrmit Percentage of 271 Labor and 58 School Leav- ing Permits Average Weekly Income(*) Percentage of Income Contributed by Child Average Rent and Per- centage of Income Weekly Income Less Child's Below Standard Average Total Weekly Income $20 or Less Owners Renters Owners Renters Owners Renters School Leaving Labor... 33% 38% 67% 62% $14.00 19.50 $17.00 19.00 39% 33% 34% 34% $3.50 20% 3.80 20% 58% 32% 63% 56% * In drawing general conclusions from the 329 cases, the average Income of renters is undoubtedly larger than that of owners. Eight home owners in the labor section have weekly incomes of $40-$60 while no renters happen to have incomes similarly high. In concluding how far economic necessity is a factor in the labor of children under 16 years of age, we have the following facts which hold good for our entire list of 329 permits, including both grammar grades and high school: 1. Average rent is uniform at 20 per cent of the average income for all classes of permits. This rental is high in comparison with other cities. 2. The generally accepted average weekly per capita income absolutely essential to cover the necessities of living is from $1.50 to $2.00 after deductions have been made for illness, death and rentals. The aver- age in Seattle for all School Leaving Permits falls below this standard. Considered from another point of view, 58 per cent of the school leaving certificates and 32 per cent of the labor certificates are granted to families in which the weekly per capita income 40 Seattle Children in School and in Industry. falls below this universally accepted standard of living. Were the expenses incident to illness, death and rentals to be deducted, this percentage in both classes would be much larger. From this point of view there is a margin of about 50 per cent in which parents by securing a labor permit may use a child as a source of income although not forced to do so because of economic pressure. Parents are not always responsible. Very frequently a child prefers to go to work either because of dissatisfaction with school or because of desire for more abundant spending money. In Seattle children themselves have voiced greater dissatisfaction with the schools than have the parents of the same children when visited in their homes. In the Federal report about two-fifths of the children were found to have left school of their own choice. School leaving permits do not allow this same exer- cise of personal judgment or desire on the part of parent and child. The lowest per capita income for all classes with- out deductions, except the child's wage, is 55 cents and the highest f 12.40. Average weekly income for average family is another legitimate method of estimating the influence of eco- nomic pressure. Twenty dollars per family is the usual minimum accepted. Reference to Table XXII. shows the average for each group composing the 329 to fall below this requirement. The same table shows that if families are grouped according to total weekly income 56 per cent of the labor certificates and 63 per cent of the school leaving certificates are held by families with weekly incomes of $20 or less. 3. The percentage of family income contributed by Seattle children is above 30 per cent in all averages. Elsewhere in the country it approaches 20 per cent. This is interesting in view of the fact that child labor here receives so high a financial reward in comparison with other cities reporting. SECTION III. Educational and Occupational Experience of Boys and Girls Up to 21 Years of Age Who Have Been Out of the Seattle Schools More Than One Year. SECTION III. Educational and Occupational Experience of Boys and Girls Up to 21 Years of Age Who Have Been Out of the Seattle Schools More Than One Year. From the third set of blanks we have 202 girls and 223 boys who furnished complete replies to both the educational and vocational questionnaire. Workers were never interviewed at their places of business. Fluently employers offered to extend this courtesy bift for many reasons it seemed best to seek employees in their homes or elsewhere after business hours. Table XXIII. Reasons Why Children Leave School — 202 Girls — 223 Boys. Cause Girls Boys Total Percentage Illness 15 54 71 7 4 51 2 46 69 13 16 77 17 100 140 20 20 128 4 Economic pressure 23 Too old, dislike, trouble, not promoted, etc 33 4 4 Spending money or preference for work 30 Total 202 223 425 The following are typical replies as to why these more experienced youths left school : "Preferred to work but would like to go back now." "Was not compelled and had never been sorry until just now." (Age 17.) "The teacher was too bull headed." (Age 16.) "Did not have the money to buy clothes and pay dues." (Age 19.) "I did not like school but am sorry I left now." (Age 18.) "I would have stayed had I known what I know now of the necessity for so doing." 43 44 Seattle Children in School and in Industry. "Wasn't getting anything from high school." "Couldn't get credit" "To try and find out what was the best line of work. I may go back." "Wanted to work for something definite." "Wanted to do something to bring in the money." "Could not keep up with the high school expenses." "Four years is too much time to put in with noth- ing to show for it." "Could not get along with the principal." "Yes, compelled to leave and was glad of it." "Left at my own choice — was discouraged." "Because I wanted to but I do not know enough to get along and am going back." (Age 16.) "I grew tired of what I was doing and left. I would do differently now." (Age 19.) "I did not realize I was making a mistake to leave." (Freshman, out six months.) "Because of certain studies." "Did not care for school and did not want to waste time." "Prefer a good trade." (This is an interesting statement in view of the fact that this boy stuck to his trade only six weeks and at the time of writing was a delivery boy — age 16.) Comparison of Table II. with Table XXIII. indi- cates that the reasons for school leaving have been fairly uniform covering a period of five years. De- tailed knowledge of the point of view of the older child at date of leaving compared with his point of view after even a brief competition in business, indi- cates that many are finding "dissatisfaction" to be a most trivial excuse and are realizing too late that lack of education is a serious handicap in adult life. With the older as with the younger group "economic pressure" has been one of the leading factors in school leaving. It is not, however, in either case entitled to the prominence which is commonly assumed. Seattle Children in School and in Industry. 45 Table XXIV Number of Years Since Leaving and Number of Positions Held. Number of Positions— Girls Number of Positions — Boys Years Out 1 2 3 4 5 5 Plus Total 1 2 3 4 5 5 Plus Total 1 .. 15 16 6 4 2 7 12 12 10 9 10 14 6 10 12 6 5 13 7 2 "3* 4 4 40 44 33 24 22 39 13 10 4 12 4 8 15 17 9 6 7 12 8 11 6 4 4 8 2 5 1 2 4 1 1 "i 2 5 2 10 11 ........ 14 41 a 3 4 4 5 1 "*i" *'"i" 54 31 26 5 5 plus 20 51 Total... 50 67 52 20 11 2 202 51 66 41 15 12 38 223 Table XX V. Summary of Number of Positions and Percentage. One Position Two Positions Three Positions Four Positions Five Positions Total No. Per Cent No. Per Cent No. Per Cent No. Per Cent No. Per Cent No. Per Cent Boys.... Girls.... 51 50 23 25 66 67 30 33 41 52 18 25 15 20 7 9 50 13 23 6 223 202 100 100 Total... 101 24 133 31 93 21 35 8 63 15 425 100 In comparing Table XXV. with Table V. it must be remembered that the 402 included under Table V. represent a complete school leaving group covering a definite period — one day to one year — while the 425 included under Table XXV. represent a group com- posed of but a small part of those leaving school during a period of approximately one to five years. The first group includes grammar school pupils only, the second both grammar and high school pupils. The first includes very young children fresh from school supervision with neither the judgment nor the experience necessary to warn them of the dangers of frequent changes, the second includes only those who have remained in industry, many of whom ac- knowledge that most of their changes were made in the early years of their industrial experience. It would be natural to expect a higher percentage of stability in the second group, and also natural to expect increase in stability as age and experience increase. Moreover it is unlikely that all actual changes have been given in the replies of older workers. 46 Seattle Children in School and in Industry. Table XXVI. Age, Grade and Retardation of Industrial Group. Girls. Grade High School Grand Age 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total 9 10 11 12 Total Total 12 2 *4 2 *3 5 12 3 19 33 21 5 1 9 6 29 52 27 5 3 9 13 6 14 1 "3* 4 3 5 1 •12 5 7 3 4 ♦9 7 3 2 19 14 19 17 31 15 16 3 71 41 17 *2 2 *3 9 24 18-21 2 20 Total 4 3 16 25 83 i 131 28 24 7 12 71 202 * Normal. Table XXVII. Age, Grade and Retardation of Industrial Group. Boys. Grade High School Grand Total Age 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total 9 10 11 12 Total 10-12 1 *1 2 6 7 1 *2 9 9 2 1 *22 28 17 6 4 5 40 48 20 6 3 4 13 5 14 1 .... 2 3 8 *14 8 9 3 2 4 *13 8 4 10 19 23 21 24 50 15 16 1 2 11 67 43 17 27 18-21 2 27 Total 1 1 6 17 25 76 126 42 31 9 15 97 223 * Normal. Table XXVUI. Summary of Age and Grade at Date of Leaving. Grade Boys Girls Grand Total Per- cent- 10- 12 13 14 15 16 16- 21 Total 10- 12 13 14 15 16 16- 21 Total age 3 1 1 6 17 25 76 97 1 5 9 33 50 159 168 1-5 4 3 7 9 28 19 2 1 1 3 3 12 33 19 4 3 16 25 83 71 5 1 1 1 '"2' 2 2 6 9 22 10 2 6 7 8 H. S. 2 17 23 "2 7 45 4 2 "*3* 3 4 5 19 2 5 1 21 14 "2 6 36 8 11 37 39 Total. 4 5 50 67 43 54 223 9 6 31 71 41 44 202 425 Table XXIX. Summary of Retardation — Industrial Group. Normal Retarded Ahead Total No. Per Cent No. Per Cent No. Per Cent No. Per Cent Boys 63 58 28 28 136 126 61 62 24 18 10 9 223 202 100 Girls 10a Total 121 28 262 61 42 10 425 100 Seattle Children in School and in Industry. 47 Tables XXVI., XXVII., XXVIII., and XXIX. for the Industrial Group correspond to Tables XI., XII., XIII. and XIV. for the group receiving School Leav- ing or Labor Permits. Each group includes both grammar grades and high school. The industrial group includes ages up to 21 years and the permit group to 16 years only. Hence we would expect to find a higher percentage of high school pupils in the former. One, again, is composed of all children in a definite group, while the other is in a sense composed of selected cases. Bona fide "economic pressure" is a much larger factor in the permit group. These facts must be taken into consideration in making comparisons as to age and grade of leaving. First Positions and Changes in Position. Table XXX. First Position and School Grade— Boys 223. First Position 5th Grade or Less 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total Per Cent Delivery and messenger Clerks 2 3 2 7 1 3 6 3* 1 18 11 2 13 8 2 4 2 3 2 10 7 3 9 4 3 2 1 9 1 7 2 6 3 2 2 "i" 3 1 1 4 .... 4 39 29 9 42 21 12 10 6 5 3 5 42 17 13 Street trades 4 1 3 1 18 Office 9 3 5 t 1 1 Sailor 1 2 1 Automobile 1 3 2 2 2 Miscellaneous 7 8 3 20 Total 8 17 25 76 42 31 9 15 223 Table XXXI. First Position and School Grade — 202 Girls. First Position 5th Grade or Less 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total Per Cent Department store 2 2 2 25 6 12 10 10 3 5 3 9 9 2 4 1 5 1 5 5 16 3 1 3 6 51 31 23 21 16 9 16 14 21 25 Office..? 15 Factory 3 3 3 1 1 4 1 3 5 1 3 3 5 3 11 1 1 .... 1 1 "i' 10 Trade g Laundry 4 Telephone 1 .... 8 7 None immediately after leaving 10 Total 7 16 25 83 28 24 7 12 202 Mi w .a ill- I 1* •s-s 1 l.as 0>OSOJC<«-«e*©«>i«eOlOCS» CO C4 ^ 01 i—* »■« ^* «Ot»I(M^H o-«j<«oooi-tt*eo»o«oeo -*eo • «« • ■«* OS 00 NNN(Ni 1-- OS » -CO 05 00OW«5( iCJI'-KNO CO -* -* c* <© m co ■«*< >0»05CN>-l» »^*COCOCOt^00 >0000~HCO a Ijl H-82 S3S fig w+ S^s si -S3 2?* S3! o oo •><»< t- o> eo o> eo oo eoeo^eoT* -coto Nio«T(towteM oo * •«* ieo»-i -eo iNtOCONWNH edooeo o* cm 05 ~h cm eo eo t~ »H eo eo --h*-* COOO ~h co eo «o o eo Nrt Hi eoo«o