THE GOSPEL OF LIFE. THE GOSPEL OF LIFE THOUGHTS INTRODUCTORY TO THE STUDY OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. BROOKE FOSS WESTCOTT, D.D., D.C.L., BISHOP OF DURHAM ; FORMERLY REGIUS PROFESSOR OF DIVINITY, CAMBRIDGE. SECOND EDITION. Honfcon : MACMILLAN AND CO. AND NEW YORK. 1895 [All Rights reserved.] IMI H O&OC KAI H AAH6EIA KAI H ZOiH. ST JOHN xiv. 6. N AYTCp ZWM6N KAI KINOYM66A KAI 6CM6N. ACTS xvii. 28. First Edition 1892. Second 1895. PAGE CONTENTS . v PREFACE . xvii CHAPTER I. THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE. General statement of the scope of the inquiry . . 1 Three final existences assumed 2 (i) 'Self 4 (ii) The world ' 5 (iii) ' GOD ' 5 The reality of these existences cannot be es- tablished by argument .... 6 Each brings its own difficulties ... 8 i. Difficulties as to the conception of ' self ' (a) Origin 9 (b) Growth. Dependence. Influence of medium ; of mechanical inventions ; of intellectual conceptions . . . . . . 10 (c) Independence. ' Freedom ' . . . .13 (d) Complex nature of the individual man : struggles : failure 16 (e) Sternness of ' Nature '. Yet man asserts himself 17 (/) looking to the future in spite of difficulties 18 These are facts 19 ii. Difficulties as to the conception of 'the world' 20 (a) The mystery involved in our belief in the external world : the relation between our impressions and that which excites them 20 2066624 vi Contents. PAGE (6) The idea of a beginning : conclusions from . 21 (a) The dissipation of energy . . 22 (/3) The discontinuity of the formulae for conduction of heat . . 24 (7) The character of molecules . . 2ft The idea of law: rests on Faith . . 27 Laws based on assumptions : explain no- thing as to force 29 We have a sense of harmony in creation . 30 At the same time we see a conflict in nature and in man .... 31 We have a natural sympathy with the ex- ternal world. This also is spiritual . 32 We have also a belief in progress . . 33 iii. Difficulties as to the conception of ' GOD ' . 34 (a) No proof of the being of GOD possible : alleged proofs are partial illustrations of the idea . . . . . 35- (6) The idea of Divine 'Personality' . . . 36 (c) Prayer 36 (d) The present relation of finite being to GOD 37 The religious history of the world. History of the Jews .37 History of the Gentiles .... 38 The questions which we ask in hope . . 39 The effort to answer them not vain . . 41 CHAPTER II. THE DUTY AND NECESSITY OF DEALING WITH THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE. The sense of the mysteries of life leads us to seek for some solution of the problems which they suggest 43 Men have in fact always sought for a solution . . 44 (i) The problems must be dealt with in some way 45 Contents. vii (ii) Action influenced by opinion .... The moral standard of action .... Conception of GOD as Moral Governor . Belief in a future life .... Facts of Revelation: the Incarnation The Atonement The view of the problems of life has in its broad aspects a great practical importance 54 Further definition of the idea of GOD . . 55 of the future life 55 of the Incarnation 56 Moral influence of living dogma ... 57 Dogma is a necessity for us . . . 58 (iii) It may be said that action will be guided by experience not by theory ... 59 Such a view is subject to serious limitations . 59 And yet more character is to be taken into account 60 The power of character is real if latent . . 61 Moral influence of views of creation as to the basis of morality 62 Final importance of what we think ... 64 CHAPTER III. THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH A SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE MUST BE SOUGHT. Point reached 65 Dangers from dominant influences .... 66 Different kinds of truths and certainty in respect of assertions regarding (i) self, (ii) the world, (iii) GOD 68 (i) Truths dependent on the limitations of man's present nature (conditions of time and space) ........ 68 viii Contents. PAGE (ii) Truths expressing the results of man's ob- servation of the external world; physical and vital ...... .69 Physical laws correspond with the isolation of the action of particular forces ... 70 Physical truth contrasted with Mathematical truth . . . ..*' . . . . . . 71 The phenomena of life still more complicated 71 Historical truth different from Physical and Mathematical truth 72 The subject of a new Science .... 73 (iii) Truths relating to our knowledge of GOD . 74 We must observe that (a) The facts belonging to each Science are in- dependent 75 (6) The facts included in a complex phenomenon can be severally isolated and examined according to their proper laws . . 76 (c) The methods of different Sciences are dis- tinct 77 Application of these observations to Theo- logy '.77 (i) The fundamental facts must be given by GOD 78 This revelation must come through life . . 79 Such 'signs' in life are the basis of Christian Theology 80 They establish a connexion between the seen and the unseen 81 (ii) The verification of these signs is up to a certain point historical .... 82 But they are confirmed also by a spiritual judgment ....... 83 Such a power corresponds with what has been recognised before 84 The proof primarily personal, but capable of wider extension ...... 85 Analogous to proofs in other cases ... 85 Contents. IX PAGE How it gains a universal force ... 85 The final test in life 85 (iii) In dealing with the facts of Theology we must take account of all the underlying Sciences 86 Hence Theology advances through the advance of these . . . . . . . 88 No one Science has peculiar access to Truth . 89 The results of each Science are distinct in kind 90 Usurpations 90 The danger greater if the method of a sub- ordinate Science is applied to a higher . 91 The method of Physics cannot rightly deal with Theology 92 CHAPTER IV. THE WORK OF THE PRJE-CHRISTIAN NATIONS TOWARDS THE SOLUTION OF THE PRO- BLEMS OF LIFE. Tentative prae-Christian solutions of the problems of life 93 The character of the solution required ... 94 The solution must be religious 94 The idea of religion 96 This idea must be traced in the history of humanity 98 The history of religion parallel in part to the history of language 100 Correspondence between groups of languages and re- ligions 102 Illustrations from the use of sex-terminations in nouns 102 from Divine Names 103 from formation of words ..... 104 But languages reveal and do not create religious ten- dencies 106 x Contents. PAGE Thus Gentile religions are a fragmentary revelation of man's nature and needs 107 In what sense there is a historical science of religion 1081 Two groups of facts to be distinguished . . . 110 The work of Persia and Greece for Judaism . . 112 The religious work of the nations recognised in the history and teaching of the Bible . . . . 114 The witness of Justin Martyr 116 of Clement of Alexandria 117 CHAPTER V. PR&-CHRISTIAN SOLUTIONS OF THE PROBLEMS OF BEING. The value of the prse-Christian Book-religions to the Christian student 121 (i) THE EELIGIONS OF CHINA . . ... . 124 (a) The primitive religion ..... 125 Imperial worship, and worship of ancestors 127 (b) Taouism 129 Conception of Tao 130 Corruption of Taouism. . . . . 131 (c) Confucianism . 132 Basis of Confucianism . . . . 134 Filial piety 135 Relation to old religion .... 136 Eetribution on earth . . . . . 138 Strength and weakness of Confucianism . 139 Importance of the primitive religion of China 141 (ii) RELIGIONS OF INDIA 142 (a) Hinduism 143 Earliest Vedic teaching 144 Brahmanism expresses the thoughts of ema- nation and dependence .... 146 Contents. xi PAGE The conception of Caste ... . . . 148 Sacrifice : Penance 150 Transmigration 152 Different aspects of the Divine power . . 153 Multiplication of specialised Divinities. . 155 Krishna . . ...... .156 (b) Buddhism . . . . . . . 157 A reformed Brahmanism . . . .158 The experiences of Gautama . . . 158 Contrast of Brahmanism .... 159 and Buddhism 160 ' The four sublime truths ' of Buddhism . 162 The continuity and solidarity of being . 164 Nirvana 166 Alleged ' atheism ' of Buddhism . . . 167 The corruption of Buddhism . . .168 (iii) ZOBOASTBIANISM . . . ' . . . . 169 Contrasts of Brahmanism and Zoroastrianism 170 The origin of Zoroastrianism . . . 172 The conceptions of Ahura Mazda . . 174 Transition from Monotheism to Dualism . 176 Doctrine of the world and man . . . 178 Praise of agriculture 180 Doctrine of last things 181 CHAPTER VI. PRESUPPOSITIONS OF THE CHRISTIAN SOLUTION. Three assumptions in the Bible 183 Difficulties recognised . . ... . . . 184 How the assumptions are presented . ( . 185 The fitness of the form .187 (i) The assumption as to God .... 188 Consequent view of creation .... 189 W. G. L. b xii Contents. PAGE (ii) The assumption as to man, the crown of the visible creation, in the Divine idea . . 191 Limitations of the assumption . . . 193 (iii) The assumption as to man's Fall . . . 194 Silence as to the Fall in the later Books of the 0. T. . . . . ... . 195 General review of the record . . . 196 The use of these postulates in the N. T. . 199 The postulates justified by experience . . 202 GOD unknowable in the sense in which men and the world are unknowable . . . 204 CHAPTER VII. "SIGNS" AS A VEHICLE OF REVELATION. The idea of a ' sign,' a miracle 206 A miracle assumes the existence of the spiritual power to which it is referred 208 The action of the spiritual power one of possible modes of explanation of the phenomenon .... 208 The moral character of the phenomenon an element in the interpretation 210 Testimony of the Pentateuch 212 of the Prophets ....... 213 of the Gospel . . 213 of St Paul 214 of the Apocalypse 215 The Bible recognises in man a power for discerning moral Truth which nothing external can override . 215 Miracles correspond with Divine modes of working . 216 The omnipotence of GOD 217 Function of miracles as parts of a great scheme . 219 Miracles not primarily proofs of a Eevelation . . 222 They place us in GOD'S Presence and reveal more of His will 224 The miracles of the Lord 226 Contents. xiii CHAPTER VIII. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHRISTIAN SOLUTION: CHRISTIANITY ABSOLUTE. PAGE Christianity absolute and historical .... 228 These characteristics complementary answering to in- finite and finite 228 Christianity absolute 229 (a) For all men . . . . . ', . 229 This universality recognised from the first . 230 Slowly realised. St Peter at Pentecost . . 231 St Paul at Athens. Gal. iii. 26 ff., Col. iii. 10 f. 232 Eelation of the three passages . . . 233 The Christian idea of human brotherhood con- trasted with Buddhist and Stoic ideas . 234 The Eedemption answers to the Creation . 235 We cannot see how the unity is realised . 237 (6) For the whole of man 237 This the teaching of the Eesurrection . . 239 (c) For all finite being 240 The teaching of the Apocalypse . . . 243 Relation to theories of Evolution . . . 244 Man and his kingdom 246 Scripture anticipates our latest thoughts . 246 (d) For all time 247 The claims of Christianity unique . . . 248 Partial views of Christianity .... 249 The need of keeping in mind its largest scope . 250 All involved in the unique fact of the Incar- nation 251 In this our view of life becomes Theocentric 253 xiv Contents. CHAPTER IX. CHARACTERISTICS OF CHRISTIANITY: CHRISTIANITY HISTORICAL. PAGE Christianity the only historical religion . . . 254 Historical in its antecedents 255 in itself 256 in its realisation . 256 (i) Christianity historical in its antecedents . 257 The fulfilment of Judaism . .- . . 258 The successive Covenants .... 260 Israel a Messianic people . . . . 261 The office of Israel for the nations . . 262 The end of Israel gained in Christianity . 264 (ii) Christianity historical in essence . . . 265 The Gospel lies in the Person of Christ . 266 No valid objection from its unique character 268 How the Gospel meets human aspirations . 270 (iii) Christianity historical in its realisation . . 272 Revelation through facts 273 Their meaning slowly gained .... 274 Progressive apprehension of the message of the Gospel 276 Post-Christian history the record of the vic- tories of the risen Christ . . . 278 Interpretation of facts contrasted with the logi- cal development of doctrine . . . 281 Present importance of the study of Church History \ 282 Contents. xv CHAPTER X. THE VERIFICATION OF THE CHRISTIAN SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE. PAGE Conditions of verification . . . . . 285 Man in relation to the seen and unseen . . . 286 The need of a revelation from the condition of man. 288 The Eevelation through life 290 Faith uses the new materials and interprets their larger meaning 291 The converging testimony of History to Christ . . 294 In Him the human and super-human are harmoniously united 296 and through His perfections a new revelation of GOD is given 298 The Person of Christ satisfies the aspirations and needs of men 299 He is the strength of every man 302 The verification of Christianity as complete as the case admits 303 It lies in its fitness to fulfil the destiny of man . 304 Christ is the Gospel 306 PREFACE. following Chapters give the substance of Lectures which I gave from time to time (to small classes of students) during the twenty years of my work at Cambridge. The thoughts which they contain have been constantly tested in pri- vate discussion, and I have found in them guidance and support in looking at the spectacle of the world of man and of nature full as it is of sufferings and sorrows and failures. No one can feel more keenly than I do how fragmentary and imperfect is the expression of facts and truths which I have pondered long 1 . At least I have 1 It was my intention to have added notes on the Modes and Epochs of Eevelation, on the characteristics of Judaism, on the sacred Books of prae-Christian religions and on the His- torical Development of Christian Doctrine, for which I have collected materials ; but it is now hardly likely that I shall be able to bring the materials into a proper shape, and those who are interested in the lines of study which I have indicated will naturally seek to supply what is wanting in this respect from other sources. xviii Preface. endeavoured to weigh my words, and to try them again and again by the test of fresh experience. My desire has been to encourage patient reflection, to suggest lines of inquiry, to indicate necessary limits to knowledge, and not to convey formulas or ready-made arguments. Thoughts cannot be transferred: they must be appropriated. Charged myself with the heavy responsibility of teaching, I have had constantly before me the trials, the dangers, the hopes, of teachers. The world is not clear or intelligible. If we are to deliver our message as Christians we must face the riddles of life and consider how others have faced them. So only shall we come to learn the meaning and resources of our Faith, in which we have that on which, as I believe, we can reason- ably rest the whole burden of the past, the present and the future. To some I shall necessarily appear to speak too doubtfully on questions of great moment, and to others too confidently. The relative value of different lines of thought will be variously esti- mated by different minds. Nothing however has been set down which does not seem to require some consideration. Not by one way but by many must we strive to reach the fulness of truth. Every argument involves some assumptions ; and I have pointed out distinctly what the Chris- Preface. xix tian teacher assumes, and how far his assumptions are justified by the manifold experience of life. I have also ventured to use experience in confir- mation of the Gospel which he proclaims. In spite of the objections which are used against the argument, I cannot but hold that human desire includes potentially the promise of satisfaction. The question is not, of course, of personal arbi- trary or chance desires, but of those which answer to our constitution, and which have found the widest and most spontaneous expression. To think otherwise is to condemn the whole course of things as false. And if, as we assume, it answers to the will of GOD, that cannot be. In this respect we may justly lay stress on the personal effort to grow better and on the confident expectation of general progress, in spite of numberless disappointments and delays. So through this unconquerable persistence of effort, failure becomes 'a triumph's evidence for the ' fulness of the days.' In other words we ' walk by faith ' in the face of riddles which remain to the last unanswered. Nor is there any ground for discontent at this condition of life. It not unfrequently happens that the clear perception that a difficulty is at present irremovable suggests a reasonable hope of fuller light hereafter. And though it may be xx Preface. possible to put many questions aside, life is pro- portionately impoverished if we do so. If indeed we consider the nature of the con- clusions which we form, it will appear that two classes alone are for us absolutely valid ; the deductions which are made from the fundamental conceptions of succession and space, and the de- ductions as to the operation of forces assumed to be constant under conditions assumed to be per- fectly known. As soon as we enter on the world without and act, we enter on the unseen and the unknown, and Faith is required to sustain and extend thought. But while this is so, there can be no opposi- tion between Reason and Faith. If Reason is the energy of the sum of man's highest powers of his true self then Faith is the highest energy of Reason. And it is most significant that the popular antithesis of Reason and Faith finds no place in Scripture. In Scripture the opposite to Faith is Sight. So it is that partial theories of life can be formed which are logically unassailable. It is [possible to maintain with the great Hindu philo- sophers that there is but one existence and that an existence purely spiritual, unchanged and '- unchangeable, and that all else is a delusive phantom. It is possible to maintain on the other Preface. xxi hand, that all of which we can ever be cognisant is purely material, subject to constant and in- evitable change, and that all else is a mere abstraction. Both positions are beyond successful logical attack ; but both are hopelessly at vari- ance with the universal instinct and conduct of men. Men live as bound by their very nature to recognise both the reality of the outer world on the one hand, and their personal responsibility on the other. Such is the ultimate issue to which we are brought as living men; and Christianity enters at once into the fulness of life, and deals & with it as men have found it to be. For no Christian doctrine is purely specula- tive. No opinion as to facts of the world if vitally apprehended can fail to influence con- duct, least of all the message of the Gospel. The Incarnation binds all action, all experience, all creation to GOD ; and supplies at once the motive and the power of service. In this sense the final test of the truth and the permanence of the Gospel is life, through the power of good which the Gospel exercises in every region of human thought and conduct perfectly in itself, though the use of its resources is marred by man's imperfection. We find in the lower in- terests of life that the best results come from action in conformity with the truth of things : are we to xxii Preface. suppose that in the highest the law fails? and that the best results come from the false ? But it may be said that we have no right to infer the truth of a doctrine from its utility : that many beliefs have been morally useful which certainly were not true. Yet here a distinction must be made. They were effective because they were not wholly false : they were effective in virtue of the truth which they inadequately embodied. And the absolute uniqueness of Christianity lies ]i, L. in this that its capacity for good is universal and in itself without alloy. It has been proved to avail for all circumstances, for all races, for all times. For Christianity offers in a real human life the thoughts by which other religions live. Nature herself does not give an answer to the riddles which she proposes ; but the whole life of men points to the answer which Christianity has given. All earlier history leads up to the Incar- nation : all later history has contributed to the interpretation of it. The Divine destiny of Cre- ation and the variety of outward things: the conflict of good and evil : the responsibility of the individual and the unity of the race : the incom- prehensible majesty of GOD and His infinite love : these truths, which found fragmentary expression in prse-Christian religions, are set before us in the Person and Work of the Lord, in His Birth and Preface. xxiii Passion and Resurrection and Ascension, so that all mysteries are brought together and reconciled in one mystery. In the Lord Jesus Christ, One Person, we see all things summed up, man, humanity, creation, in the last issue of life, and united to GOD. Christianity is in life and through life. It is not an abstract system but a vital power, active through an organised body. It can never be said that the interpretation of the Gospel is final. For while it is absolute in its essence so that nothing can be added to the revelation which it includes, it is relative so far as the human appre- hension of it at any time is concerned. The facts are unchangeable but the interpretation of the facts is progressive. Post-Christian history an- swers to prae-Christian history. In the latter a Divine Covenant led up little by little to a Divine Presence in humility. That Divine Pre- sence itself leads up through the manifold disci- pline of the Church, so we believe, to a future Divine Presence in glory. The Ascension was the occasion of the promise of the Return. There cannot be, I have said, any new revela- tion. All that we can need or know lies in the Incarnation. But the meaning of that revelation which has been made once for all can itself be revealed with greater completeness. In this xxiv Preface. sense many signs seem to shew that we are standing now on the verge of a great epoch of revelation. But however this may be, let our attitude at any rate be that of those who know that every lesson of nature and of life must illuminate the Truth which embraces the whole fulness of existence. We dishonour our Faith by anxious impatience and by jealous reservation. We believe that GOD appointed Him heir of all things through Whom He also made the world the ages, time with all its contents (Hebr. i. 2). St Paul says to us, as to the Corinthians vexed and distracted by rival schools: All things are yours : whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or things present or things to come ; all are yours ; and ye are Christ's ; and Christ is GOD'S (1 Cor. iii. 22 f.). B. F. D. ROBIN HOOD'S BAY. Sept. 13th, 1892. NOTICE TO SECOND EDITION. edition is, with the exception of a few verbal corrections, a reprint of the former one. If other work had allowed me, I should have been glad to develop some thoughts in the essay more fully, but, even as they are presented, they will, I believe, suggest the reflections which I desired to convey, to all readers who are not (to borrow a characteristic phrase of Bishop Butler's) ' satisfied with seeing what is said, without going 'any farther.' The truths which we hold are worth to us just what they cost us and no more. B. F. D. AUCKLAND CASTLE, BISHOP AUCKLAND. Jan. 22nd, 1895. CHAPTER I. THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE. A RELIGION can only be understood when it is studied in relation to the facts, and the cir- cumstances, and the experience, with which it corresponds. This is true of all religions and in the largest sense it is true of Christianity. Chris- tianity, of which Christian Doctrine is the intel- lectual expression, is, like every other religion, an answer to questions which are necessarily sug- gested by human life. It does not introduce fresh mysteries into the world : it meets mysteries which already exist. It has been however a natural consequence of the fact that Christian Doctrine in one form or other has permeated Western civilisation and thought for many cen- turies, that the mysteries which belong to exist- ence, so far as it falls within our knowledge, are commonly referred to the Christian view of existence, as if they had no independent place in human life. We first meet with them in the presentation of the Christian Faith, and we W. G. L. 1 y fa, V t*( I v i 2 Three final existences [CHAP. conclude hastily that they belong to it in some peculiar sense. In order therefore that we may see clearly what Christian Doctrine really is, what it brings that is novel either of darkness or of light to the whole conception of being, we must endeavour to gain some notion of the actual circumstances in which we find ourselves, of the problems which our condition inevitably proposes to us, of the imperious impulses which drive us to seek some solution of them, of the solutions which have been formed independently during the prse- Christian growth of humanity, before we can rightly appreciate the characteristics of the Christian solution. I assume at the outset as a clear result of personal and social experience, of the main teach- ing of the life of the individual and of the life of humanity, that as men we are so constituted as to recognise three final existences which sum up for us all being, self, the world, and GOD ; or, to put the thought in another form, that we are so constituted as to recognise in that which is with- out us, ' the not ourselves,' something which cor- responds in a certain sense to the 'body' and ' soul ' which we recognise in our own being, a 'material' order and a force controlling it. We become first conscious of the reality of i.] assumed. 3 these existences through experience, through life. And it is through experience, which we are able to interpret, that we discern more of their nature. The process is necessarily slow. It is only by degrees that we learn to interpret severally the simplest impressions of sense, the position (for example) and the movements of objects in space ; and it is reasonable to expect that it will be more difficult to gain a general interpretation of the many phenomena which tend to give pre- cision and completeness to the master thoughts of our whole nature. So in fact it has been and is both with the individual and with the race. We have each of us in the course of our own growth, and we can see that the same is true of nations, shaped gradually the conceptions of self, the world, and GOD, which we now have. In this there has been nothing arbitrary, nothing accidental. In the largest sense we have taken ' living ' as our guide in the process, so far as it has been consciously pursued. In part however it has been accomplished silently, 'naturally,' as we say, by a kind of moral growth. At the same time we start on our individual course from different points in the line of the great inquiry. The accumulated experience of the past is to a certain extent the inheritance of each succeeding generation, but this wealth of 12 4 Self, [CHAP. experience on which we now enter must be vitally appropriated in order that it may become effective. And it cannot be too often repeated that neither knowledge nor feeling is an end for man ; we seek to know more truly and to feel more justly that we may fulfil our part in life with more perfect service. Questioning then my own experience, and in- terpreting, so far as I am able, the life of others, as it falls under my observation, I hold that the assumption which I have made, that as men we necessarily recognise these three existences, self, the world, and GOD, is fully justified. The con- viction rests ultimately on my personal conscious- ness ; but, as far as I can see, my fellow-men act under the influence of the ideas which I dis- tinguish by these names. At the same time the names are used with a wide range of meaning, and it is necessary to mark somewhat more exactly the sense in which I take them as ex- pressing for man the final elements of being. I am conscious of ' self.' I feel I know, that is, immediately with the most certain assurance which I can realise that I am something more than a collection of present sensations or thoughts. I feel that there is a past which is individually I.] the World, GOD. 5 my own, and that there will be a future, long or short, which will be mine. I feel that there is an inalienable continuity in a limited series of experiences which belongs to me alone. And I carry on the anticipation of this essential perma- nence of the ' I ' beyond the region in which experience can work. All around me act, as far as I can judge, under the influence of the same convictions. Looking without I observe that men, to speak generally, are filled with anxiety for their posthumous reputation; and that they are scrupulously reverent of the dead. I am conscious also of 'the world.' I feel, that is, that there is outside me something finite by which I am affected in various ways. I feel, however difficult it may be for me to determine the relation between my perceptions of things and the things themselves, that my perceptions are not originated, though they are conditioned by my individual 'self.' I feel that my present personal life is inconceivable without the full recognition of the medium in which it is passed and by which it is modified. I am conscious in the third place of GOD. ^/ It is not necessary for me to inquire here into the origin of the conception. I feel that the 6 The reality of these existences cannot [CHAP. conception being present corresponds with what I observe within and without. I feel, that is, that beside the 'self and 'the world' in which the 'self moves, both of which are changeable and transitory, there is That which is absolutely One and Eternal. Each man is for himself the centre of unity from moment to moment, but I feel that this fleeting image of unity must answer to a reality in which all being ' is and moves.' I feel moreover that all that is noblest in men, all by which they are capable of striving after the good and the beautiful and the true, all by which they are bound one to another, must find its archetype in this One Eternal. And yet more than this, when I look without, I feel that the order which we regard gives rise to ideas of purpose and progress which, being what we are, we refer, under the imagery of our own finite experience, to the action of a wise Designer. And, last of all, the analogies of life constrain us to think of Him as One who may be loved and who Himself loves, while He is yet dwelling in light unapproachable and robed in awful majesty. I cannot think of Him as other than Holy and Just, however feeble human words may be to express what I dimly divine. The consciousness of these three existences i.] be established by argument. 7 quickened, intensified, extended, by personal and social experience underlies, I believe, in some degree all human thought. The consciousness may be, and in many cases is, imperfectly de- fined, but it belongs to the nature of man; and perhaps it offers the truest characterisation of man. The final conclusion which we reach in regard to the belief to which it witnesses more or less clearly is that we are so made as to live under its influence so far as it is defined. If an objector refuses to acknowledge the reality of any one of the three existences thus presented to us, he occupies a position proof against all argu- ment. A man may doubt the ' truth ' of his own sensations and of his own consciousness for the moment or even permanently. If he does so, and so far as he does so, he is secure against all assaults of reasoning. But his opinions can be brought to a practical test. If, for example, a man apparently in the full possession of his senses persistently says that he cannot see, and that in fact he does not see, it is enough to notice whether he acts as if he saw : whether his steps are guided and his judgments formed exactly as if he enjoyed the fulness of vision ; or whether he actually suffers the disadvantages of blindness. In the first case, we shall feel that there must be some misunderstanding between 8 Each existence brings [CHAP. us as to the nature of vision : in the second case that, in spite of appearances, the man is defective in that which belongs to normal humanity. We must apply the same test to those who make corresponding statements in regard to the fundamental facts of morals and religion. If a man maintains that he and his fellow-men are automata and still dispenses praise and blame, strives to discipline and cultivate his own powers, watches carefully over the education of his children: I must conclude that in spite of his words he really believes that man is ' free/ that is, individually responsible, no less than I do, though he does not express his belief in the same language. Or again if he holds the permanence of law, and holds also that there is on the whole a progress in the world and in humanity towards a higher and nobler type of being and living, and consciously and confidently accepts his part in furthering it : then even if he says that GOD is beyond human knowledge, I cannot but see that he has acknowledged what I hold to be of the essence of the idea of GOD. And so it is that many who theoretically affirm that they are automata, or that the world exists only in the mind of man, or that there is no GOD, yet shew in action that they have a more practical belief in personal responsibility, in Nature, and I.] its own difficulties. 9 in GOD than some who do not pause to question the common Creed. Here as elsewhere we are taught to know men as they really are not by words but by experience. We find ourselves then face to face with these ultimate elements of being and thought ; and as soon as we begin to reflect upon any one of them, as soon as we begin to act, we are beset by speculative difficulties and contradictions. Each existence, as we have come to apprehend it, brings its own difficulties with it; and the diffi- culties of each taken by themselves are final, inexplicable. Whether we admit 'self alone to be the one ultimate existence which we know, or recognise self and the world, or self and the world and GOD, we must bear with what patience or faith we can mysteries which are like in kind though they may differ in number. These mys- teries furnish the problems with which religions deal, problems which we have now to endeavour to apprehend, problems which, as I believe, Chris- tianity solves so far as a solution is possible, though it does not alone or primarily propose them. i. We will take the idea of 'self first. We have no sooner named the word than we are 10 Difficulties of Self: [CHAP. confronted with an overwhelming mystery. What can we say as to the origin of 'self ? How can we adjust in thought the relation of the child to the line from which he springs ? How much do we derive directly from our parents, and where or from what source is that communicated which gives to us our individuality ? We may say, and say with justice, that ' the dead rule the living,' but what are the limits of their dominion ? The most absolute tyrant finds bounds set to his power somewhere. And the idea of 'self involves separation, personality, something which is ours only. How do we obtain and justify that con- ception of ' our own ' ? We go a step further. The germ of 'self is given, and we watch the progress of its de- velopment. The growth of this personality is up to a certain point like the growth of a plant. The product of any particular seed is fixed within the limits of a type, while within these limits there is room for the widest variation in health, and vigour, and shape, and colour, and beauty, and fruitfulness, from the action of external influences which we can trace and measure. So it is, up to a certain point, with a man. His type of character is fixed at his birth : and at the same time there is the possibility of endless differences I.] Origin, Growth, Dependence. 11 in the particular realisation of the type from the conditions of the environment under which it takes outward shape. It would be easy to multiply illustrations. No one who has looked patiently and reverently upon life will be in- clined to underrate the influences upon a man's nature which are wholly beyond his control, influences of country and class and parentage and education and material circumstances. It is of momentous consequence for the final character of any one whether he be one of many or an only child in his first home ; whether he belong to a class accustomed to rule, or to a class accustomed to labour or to serve ; whether he be a Latin or a Celt or a Teuton ; whether he be born in the 9th or the 19th century. We hardly realise how even a lifeless machine or a mere intellectual concep- tion can stir human life to its inmost depths, so that a discovery made at a particular time separates by an ineffaceable partition those who came before from those who come after. The steam-engine, for example, not only increased enormously the power of material transforma- tions, but it has also modified irrevocably the conditions of labour, that is, it has modified the conditions of the social discipline of men. Or, to take an illustration of the other class, the Copernican system has changed the whole aspect 12 Influence of intellectual conceptions. [CHAP. of the universe for man, and with this the whole influence which it exercises upon his character. It has given the earth a new position in relation to the stellar system which later investigations are slowly enabling us to interpret. And the lesson is one which we shall do well to take to heart. For, if for a time it appeared that we had lost something by the removal of our globe from its central place, we are now beginning to see that the final effect of the changed view is to ennoble our conception alike of the world and of man's place in it ; to lead us to abandon a physical standard in our estimate of things ; to perceive a harmony between the conditions of being realised in space and the conditions of being realised in time; for there is nothing irrational in supposing that the earth occupies towards the material universe a position corresponding to that which man occupies with regard to the multitudinous forms of life, which, as we observe them in geological records, converge towards him as their crown. The earth, that is, is brought back again to be a true centre in a deeper sense than that of local position. And no one probably will now deny that the heliocentric view of our system, passing, as it necessarily does, into some dim conception of a still vaster order, when it is thus considered, is more religious and, in the fullest I.] Independence. 13 sense, more Scriptural than the geocentric view which it displaced. By this signal illustration we can see how the interpretation of the same conception, as well as the introduction of a new conception, may pro- foundly influence the commonest and the highest thoughts of man. The same law holds good even where at present we are less able to trace its working, as in theories of creation and develop- ment, of law, and the like. Man, in a word, is dependent on that which lies outside himself socially, materially, intellectually ; and the results of this dependence reach to every part of his being. He is dependent on the past, from which he draws his inheritance of manifold wealth for ' thought and action. He is dependent on the present, in which he finds the scene, the materials, and the conditions of his activity. He is depen- dent even on the future, in which he finds through hope the inspiration and support of effort which cannot bring a return within the limits of his hour of work. Man is dependent : this is one side of the Truth. But his circumstances are the materials out of which he has to build his life with an in- determinate personal power. He is conscious of responsibility; this consciousness is indeed the 14 Freedom. [CHAP. essence of the idea of ' self.' Man, to state the case shortly, ' depends upon the circumstances to 'which he owes his origin and under which he 'lives, but, in the fulness of his nature, he does 'not result from them.' He acknowledges that he is responsible : there is the witness to the fact of essential freedom; he acknowledges that he fails : there is the witness to the imperfection of freedom. It is not possible here to enter in any detail into the discussion of the nature of ' freedom,' but it is of the utmost importance that we should avoid one prevalent error about it. We must, that is, carefully distinguish freedom from the simple power of doing any thing under any circumstances. Such a power would be potential slavery. Freedom is the power to effect the one right thing which presents the perfect harmony of the agent and the circumstances. Freedom is positive and not neutral. It is the ability to fulfil the law of our being without let or hin- drance, to do what we ought to do; and this presupposes for its perfection and permanence the absolute inability to do what is contrary to our proper nature. Thus there are two distinct ele- ments in freedom, self-determination and right determination. Our consciousness tells us that we have freedom in the sense of self-determina- I.] Complexity of man. 15 tion, but that disturbing influences interfere with the fitness of our choice. For man in his essential nature, no less than in his actual condition, per^ feet freedom is the result of discipline through which right action becomes habitual and finally assured. In the last and highest form man's freedom is the conscious acceptance of that which he knows to be the will of Goo 1 . The conflict between our dependence and our freedom is felt in all its intensity when we look within. Self is one and one indivisibly ; and yet popular language which expresses the common experience of men and our own personal expe- rience constrains us to distinguish elements, so to speak, in this unity. We say popularly, to use the broadest division, that we are made up of ' mind ' (soul) and ' matter ' (body). Nothing, at 1 Compare Aug. in Ps. cxv., 6. Omnis creatura subdita Creatori est, et verissimo Domino verissimum debet famula- tum, quern cum exhibet libera est, hanc accipiens a Domino gratiam ut ei non necessitate sed voluntate deserviat. Ep. CLVII. (col. 89), 7 f. Desinant ergo sic insanire, et ad hoc se intelligant habere quantum possunt liberum arbitrium, non ut superba voluntate respuant adjutorium sed ut pia voluntate invocent Dominum. Hsec enim voluntas libera tanto erit liberior quanto sanior: tanto autem sanior quanto divinse misericordiae gratiasque subjectior. Cypr. ad Don. c. 4. Dei est inquam, Dei est omne quod possumus : inde vivimus, inde pollemus... 16 Failure. [CHAP. first seems easier than to distinguish them sharply: and so it is that we all are inclined to set them apart in actual existence. But if we proceed far with the exact definition of the difference we shall be met by difficulties analo- gous to those which occur in fixing the limits of 'life' and of the different types of life. These difficulties may and we must be prepared for the result prove to be insurmountable. The last word of Truth on the subject may be, and every word of Truth is precious to the Christian, that for man mind and matter are both abstractions and not independent realities. But however little we may be able to define the limits or explain the mutual action of mind and matter, of body, soul, and spirit in the fuller division of Scripture, we are conscious of rival impulses which stir us. Our being does not move as one harmonious whole. Just as we strive to overcome obstacles without, we find ourselves striving to overcome obstacles within. In both cases alike we feel the effort : we know that it costs us something : we acknowledge that we are answerable for making or neglecting to make it. Our whole life is spent in aiming at something which we cannot reach, but no ill success absolves us from the necessity of further labour. There is in those whom common consent allows to be men I.] Sternness of Nature. 17 of the noblest type, an unending endeavour to attain to higher knowledge and purer virtue. But as far as our eyes can reach, or the experience of others can enlighten us, the best and saintliest fall far short to the last of what they believe to have been within their power. There is some- thing in us ' a baseness in the blood ' different from weakness : an evil, a perversion in our nature. There is an actual shadow over life. This sense of present personal failure is sharp- ened by the inexorable sternness of 'Nature.' ' Nature ' appears to be wholly regardless of the individual. There may be mercy elsewhere, but physical laws shew none, and offer no promise that it will be found. Another rule may hold good in another order, but these, as every day ( teaches us with appalling emphasis, visit the sins of fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation, and claim from him who vio- lates them the last farthing of the penalty. For man, so far as he has and transmits a material nature, there is no release from inevitable con- sequences. Yet here again a mystery, the old mystery of Prometheus, opens before us. Man feels his powerlessness in the face of physical forces, and yet he feels that he is greater than they. They go on and he vanishes away, but W. G. L. 2 18 The Future. [CHAP. his fellows after him undismayed reassert their preeminence. We carry our thoughts yet further. It is true that a beginning seems to our reason to imply an end, but we refuse to accept the conse- quence. It is true that death closes what we can see of life, but we cannot admit that it closes life. The conviction that ' we ' shall survive that last change remains unshaken when every argument by which the conviction is supported gives way. The contrast, the antagonism, between what we can see and what we feel, our attainments and our powers, which follows us all through our present existence becomes most marked at the end. The mystery of birth is consummated in the mystery of death. And, what is most amazing, we cling to our belief in a life to come, while yet, as far as we can see, Nature offers no hope of forgiveness. The terrible law, embodied by ^Eschylus, according to which evil acts propagate in endless succession a progeny like themselves, seems to sum up what we can learn by experience of the retribution of evil doing. No repentance on earth can undo the past. We cannot unmake ourselves. And further than this, and yet more appalling, no personal repentance or amendment L] These Mysteries are Facts. 19 can, as far as we see, undo the evil of which we have been the occasion to others. Of all visions none can be more terrible than that of the man who looks towards a future state in which shall be realised the full and due results of this life in the way of natural sequence. For if we regard the whole matter from the side of reason we shall see that the greatest mystery of the life to come is not the prospect of unending retribution, but the possibility of blotting out the consequences of sin. Now these mysteries of ' self are facts. Every one knows that they are real apart from all religious belief whatever. Our origin, our growth, our independence and freedom, our constitution, our personal dignity, our destiny, offer problems which we cannot refuse to consider except at the cost of abdicating our loftiest privileges. Chris- tianity did not introduce these problems into life ; it did not even first reveal them. They are and they always will be while time is. Christianity is addressed to man and to humanity as living in the face of them. And as we come to see them more plainly we shall come to know better what Christianity is, for Christianity, as we shall see hereafter, enables us to contemplate them with certain hope. 22 20 The mysteries of the World. [CHAP. ii. From 'self we turn to 'the world.' This sphere of being also is beset by mysteries which are commonly unobserved from the fact that the surface of things offers enough to occupy and distract our attention. We are, as we have seen, forced to believe that there is an external world: yet how little do we reflect that there is here any room for faith where knowledge may seem to be immediate. But no one who does pause to reflect can fail to discern that no mystery can be greater than that which is involved in the passage from the per- ceptions of things which belong to us alone to the things themselves outside us. All that we can say is that just as we are constituted to believe in the continuity of our own existence, so are we constituted to believe in the reality of an out- ward world corresponding to our perceptions. We do not attempt to distinguish in any par- ticular case the elements in the whole impression which belong respectively to that which produces the impression and to that which is conscious of it. We have, so to speak, a single equation and two unknown quantities. So it is generally, and so it is also with regard to the several impressions, which we receive in detail in con- nexion with special conditions. We do not know enough either of ourselves or of that which is I.] Relation of perceptions to things. 21 not ourselves to enable us to assign to that which is without and that which is within their shares in the whole result. But it is no less a duty to acknowledge that the simplest of human experiences, the perception of a green leaf or of the blue sky, involves mysteries. How, for example, can we form any notion of the world as it was before the existence of man ? We cannot suppose that it existed only in relation to a being not yet formed. We cannot say that things are always perceived by GOD as man perceives them and so exist. Evidently we are met by an insoluble problem ; and it is well that we should feel that the problem lies before us and that it is insoluble. It is at least a sign of the limitation of our powers in a direction where we can conceive that knowledge is possible through other faculties than those which we possess. Here then is our primal difficulty. We have acknowledged it: our way is still beset by another. There is the mystery of a beginning, which may be taken as the type of all mysteries of finiteness. It is as impossible to conceive by a mere effort of thought that the world had a beginning as it is to conceive that it had not a beginning. We might therefore be inclined to reckon this question like the last as one wholly 22 The idea of a beginning. [CHAP. insoluble by reason. But light here comes from an unexpected quarter; and larger experience points to a distinct decision as far as the present order is concerned. If we pursue the interpreta- tion of phenomena sufficiently far, we are forced to conclude that the present order has existed only for a finite time, or in other words that the present order cannot be explained on the supposi- tion of the continuous action of forces which we can now observe, acting according to the laws which represent to us what we can observe of the characteristics of their action. This conclusion that the world, as we know it, has existed only for a measurable time is one of the latest and perhaps most unlocked for results of physical research. The general law from which it follows is known as that of 'the dissipation of energy.' This principle is the corre- lative of the law of the conservation of energy which is ' the most complete expression hitherto 'obtained of the belief that all the changes of ' phenomena are but different distributions of the ' same stock of energy, the total quantity of which 'remains invariable. This energy is conserved 'but it may be dissipated. It is indestructible ' but it may cease to be available, when it cannot i.] Dissipation of energy. 23 ' be made to do visible work.' 1 This work may be, under the conditions of our system, reduced to three kinds : the production of visible motion ; the com- munication of heat from a hotter to a colder body ; the transference of pressure in a system of constant volume from parts under great pressure to parts where the pressure is less. Now in each of these cases the doing of work is accompanied by a diminution of available energy. If, for example, visible motion is produced a certain amount of energy is lost by friction ; or, in another aspect of the same case, if heat is transformed into motion, a part of the heat is forthwith diffused, and, when so diffused, it cannot afterwards be made effective to produce action. This diffusion therefore and generally this diminution of avail- able energy can only have been continued for a limited time, for otherwise the end of a dead equilibrium would have been already reached. ' We have,' in other words, ' an irreversible ' process always going on, at a greater or less rate, 'in the universe. If therefore there was ever 'an instant at which the whole energy of the ' universe was available energy, that instant must ' have been the very first instant at which the uni- ' verse began to exist. If there ever shall come a ' time at which the whole energy of the universe 1 Prof. Clerk Maxwell, in Nature, ix. pp. 198 ff. 24 Formulce for [CHAP. 'has become unavailable, the history of the uni- ' verse will then have reached its close. During ' the whole intervening period the available energy 'has been diminishing and the unavailable in- ' creasing by a process as irresistible and as irre- 'versible as Time itself. The duration of the 'universe according to the present order of ' things is therefore essentially finite both a parte 1 ante and a parte post.' 1 In other words the assumed permanence of the existing laws of matter involves the conse- quence that the universe had a beginning within a measurable time ; and if it be said that we have no right to assume the uniform action in the past of the laws which hold good now, that is to con- cede at once what is for us equivalent to a creative act. The general law, which points to a his- torical beginning of the present order, finds expression in a particular case which is of great interest. The formulae which represent the ob- served laws of the conduction of heat force us to take account at some point in the past of a creative act, that is of a discontinuity in the present order of phenomena. According to these formulas it is possible to foresee the thermal 1 Prof. Clerk Maxwell, in Nature, ix. p. 200. I.] conduction of heat. 25 condition of any number of bodies at any future time so long as thermal action only takes place between them. If we go back, the same process may be reversed for a certain distance and the condition of the bodies may be referred to an earlier and continuous action of the same kind. But at last a limit is reached at which the condition of the bodies can no longer be explained in the same way. At this point then some change must have taken place in the relation of the bodies which marked essentially a fresh beginning. Again I will use the words of a master to describe the fact : 'The irreversible character of this process ' [the dissipation of energy] is strikingly embodied 'in Fourier's theory of the conduction of heat, ' where the formula themselves indicate a possi- 'ble solution of all positive values of the time ' which continually tends to a uniform diffusion of ' heat. But if we attempt to ascend the stream 'of time by giving to its symbol continually ' diminishing values, we are led up to a state of ' things in which the formula has what is called a ' critical value ; and if we inquire into the state of 'things the instant before, we find that the 'formula becomes absurd. We thus arrive at ' the conception of a state of things which cannot ' be conceived as the physical result of a previous 26 The character [CHAP. 'state of things, and we find that this critical ' condition actually existed at an epoch not in the ' utmost depths of a past eternity but separated ' from the present time by a finite interval.' 1 Thus the principle of the dissipation of energy suggests distinctly both a beginning and an end of the present order. It suggests also some creative action, so far at least as to make it clear that the laws which we can trace now will not allow us to suppose that the order which they express has existed for ever. Physicists have gone yet farther. If matter is pursued to its ultimate form, we find at last, according to the most competent judgment, molecules in- capable of subdivision without change of sub- stance, which are absolutely similar for each substance. A molecule of hydrogen, for example, has exactly the same weight, the same period of vibration, the same properties in every respect, whether it be found in the Earth or in the Sun or in Sinus. The relations of the parts and movements of the planetary systems may and do change, but these molecules 'the foundation stones of the material universe remain unbroken and unworn.' 'No theory of evolution can be 1 Clerk Maxwell, Address at Brit. Assoc., Liverpool, Sept. 1870. (Nature, n. pp. 421 f.) i.] of molecules. 27 'formed to account for the similarity of mole- ' cules, for evolution necessarily implies continuous ' change, and the molecule is incapable of growth ' or decay, of generation or destruction. None of 'the processes of Nature, since the time when ' Nature began, have produced the slightest dif- 'ference in the properties of any molecule. We 'are therefore unable to ascribe either the exist- 'ence of the molecules or the identity of their ' properties to the operation of any of the causes 'which we call natural The exact quality of 'each molecule... precludes the idea of its being ' eternal and self-existent.' 1 We cannot, in other words, represent to ourselves the ground of this final and immutable similarity in any other way than as a result of a definite creative will. So much at least is clear, that the mystery of creation is not introduced by religion. It is forced upon us by the world itself, if we look steadily upon the world. And no mystery can be greater than this inevitable mystery. Again : if we turn from the conception of be- coming to that of being, from creation to orderly existence, we find ourselves confronted with- new 1 Nature, vm. p. 441. (Molecules, a Lecture delivered at Bradford, 1873, by J. Clerk Maxwell. Compare Introductory Lecture on Experimental Physics, pp. 21 ff.) 28 Conception of Law. [CHAP. difficulties. The idea of law as applied to the suc- cession of external phenomena rests simply upon faith. We extend to the world, with necessary modifications, the idea of persistence which under- lies the consciousness of 'self.' The conception of uniform repetition, of the permanence of that which is, is supplied by us from within to the results of observation. We are so constituted as to conclude with more or less confidence from a certain number of uninterrupted repetitions, that the series will continue. We are so constituted as to extend this form of conclusion boldly even where the result depends upon the combination of many conditions which may severally fail of fulfilment. And in affirming that the succession in any case will be uniform, we do not simply affirm that the same antecedents will produce the same consequents the opposite of which is inconceivable but, which is a very different thing, that like antecedents will produce like consequents, and that in any particular case, we know all the antecedents, and know them fully, of which we cannot possibly be sure. Absolute accuracy in concrete things is unattainable. In the present order of things no antecedent can be the same in two cases. Nothing can actually recur. Every phenomenon is in its completeness unique. We may indeed be sure that if the I.] Laws of Nature based on assumption. 29 force of gravitation continues to act ten days hence as it has acted during all past experience, and if our formulae express adequately all the conditions of its action, and if no other force, acting, it may be, periodically, shall interfere, then the sun will rise at the time to which we look forward. But each one of these suppositions is justified by belief and not by knowledge. The belief becomes confirmed day by day as that which was future becomes past. But the past in itself can give us no knowledge of the future. With regard to that we can to the end only have a belief; so that Faith lies at the basis of our confidence in natural law. As we reflect, difficulties still thicken round us. What we call 'a law' describes in its sim- plest form the general relation of phenomena so far as we have observed them. Practically, from the very nature of the case, we are able only to see a little, and that little for a little time; but for purposes of reasoning we assume that what we observe will be permanent, and inasmuch as the conditions and the field of our observation do not vary greatly, experience may justify the assumption as far as it goes, though still the assumption may be false; just as it is easy to imagine a circle so large that a small arc might 30 Signs of harmony in Nature [CHAP. not be distinguishable from a straight line by any measurements which we could "make. And further if we are at liberty to assume that what we call ' laws ' are uniform for us and for the whole range of our possible experience, still they finally explain nothing. A ' law ' has no virtue to shew its own constitution or beginning. A law can reveal nothing of the absolute nature of that which works according to it. So far from doing this, laws constrain us to ask more importunately, as we grow more sensible of their simplicity, how we can conceive of their origin ? how we can conceive of that however we call it which they present to us in action ? A law does not dispense with these questions but sharpens and reiterates them. If we follow out intently the movements of bodies and their vital transformations we shall look more intently than other men to that which binds phenomena together and guides present human life. The idea of law leads directly to that of harmony. And at all times men have been profoundly impressed by the signs of a magni- ficent unity in the world. They have seemed to themselves to see these in every wide view of the material universe and of the general course and conditions of life. From age to age, as I.] and present conflict. 31 knowledge has widened, it has appeared to great teachers to be more and more clear that there has been a progress in the physical world and in the moral world. The rapidity and confidence, for example, with which the theory of 'development' has been welcomed within our own time, a theory which has found acceptance out of all proportion to the direct value of the evidence by which it is supported, witness to the power of this tendency in man's interpretation of the phenomena of life. We do not at present inquire whether these signs of progress find their fulfilment. It is enough that they should commonly be held to be legible. The mystery of an end, far-off as it may be, towards which the universe is moving, crowns the mystery of creation and the mystery of law. But side by side with the signs of an under- lying or unattained unity in the world, out of which it appears to rise or towards which it appears to move, when it is regarded in its broad extent, there are also countless losses, interrup- tions, conflicts in the visible condition of things. To one observer the present spectacle of the races of men becomes a vision of despair, to another a preparation for a natural millennium. But whether our eyes are fixed on the present or on the future the actual discord is often enough to banish the 32 The 'pathetic fallacy.' [CHAP. thought of the promised harmony. It is not necessary to discuss in detail the character of these conflicting indications of truth and false- hood, of beauty and ugliness, goodness and cruelty, or how far the failure or sacrifice of fragments may be made to subserve to the well-being of the whole. Storms, earthquakes, eruptions on the one side, wars and passions on the other, pro- claim the broad lesson of suffering and imperfection in the world, so far as our observation reaches, with alarming vividness. The very fact that some speculators in all ages have affirmed that the only adequate explanation of the origin of the present state of things is to be found in the antagonism of two rival powers wrought out on earth, is sufficient to shew the reality of this struggle between good and evil. However we may account for the beginning or for the con- tinuance of it, the struggle is going on. This mystery again is one from which there is no escape. The struggle is going on without us and within us, in the world and in ourselves, and we partake in the whole struggle. This consideration brings into light a new mystery. That which has been called 'the pathetic fallacy' reveals, as I believe, one of the profoundest truths of being. I.] Progress. 33 There is a life running through all creation in which we share. We severally think with a mind which is more or less in harmony with a universal mind. It is more than a mere metaphor to say that we have sympathy with Nature and Nature with us. And if we are startled to find that the action of the rnind is connected with certain defi- nite changes of matter as physiologists have esta- blished, we must remember that the reasonable conclusion from this fact is not that the mind is material, in the sense of being corruptible and transitory, but that matter is spiritual. For it shews that the one force exerted through matter of which we are conscious is such. And what must be said of the future ? What indications are there of the issue of this conflict which reaches through all being and all life ? Must we suppose that things move on in a uniform course ? or that they revolve in cycles ? There is at least no ground in the being of things themselves to expect a progress, an advance from good to better, in nature or in history. The ' survival of the fittest ' through conflict, in respect of the conditions of present physical existence, by no means assures us of the survival of the fittest absolutely, in respect of the highest capacities of human nature. If we find that we cling to the W. G. L. 3 34 The idea of GOD. [CHAP. belief that the world does so advance, then this persistency of faith can only be due to the con- viction that there is a true moral government of the universe : that the evil is something which does not belong to the essence of creation and is therefore separable from it : that the contest here is not a war between rival powers, but a rebellion of a subject against his lord. iii. In this way the world adds its mys- teries to the sum of the dark problems of life, the mysteries of man's perception of the world, of creation, of law, of that which acts by law, of conflict, of unity, of sympathy, of progress. They lie before us, whether we regard them or not ; and consciously or unconsciously we all deal with them. Nor is this all. They lead us up at last to other mysteries, the last mysteries of being on which I propose to touch, the mysteries which are involved in the idea of GOD. This idea is, I have assumed, natural to man, and necessarily called out into some form of distinctness just as the other ideas of 'self and 'the world.' But difficulties begin as soon as we attempt to set our thoughts upon it in order. If we try to establish by argument the existence of a Being Whom we may reverence i.] No 'proof of the existence of GOD. 35 and love, our intellectual proofs break down. The ' proofs ' which are derived from the supposed necessity that something must remain fixed in the midst of change, or that a real being must corre- spond to the highest thought of man, if they are pressed to their last consequences, issue in pan- theism. The 'proofs' again which are derived from the observation of design, of the adaptation I of means to an end, or from the dictates of conscience, make man and man's ways of thinking measures of all being in a manner which cannot be justified. Nor would they lead to an adequate conclusion. The Being to which they guide us is less than the Being for Whom we look and in Whom we trust. Such arguments are fitted to bring into greater distinctness that knowledge ojMjrOD, which man is born to pursue, to quicken and to illustrate his search for it, to shew the correspondence of the higher idea of GOD which he shapes with the suggestions and signs of nature and action and thought. But they have no final or absolute validity. We can know that only which falls within the range of our minds. We abandon then, it may be, all attempts to prove by reason what we find to be true in experience, and simply strive to give reality to the idea which we have. As we do so, we are at 32 36 The Personality of GOD. Prayer. [CHAP. once baffled by the conception of the ' personality' of GOD. For us ' personality ' is expressed by and is the expression of limitation. How can we extend this notion to an Infinite Being? and, if this is impossible, how then can we supply in any other way that which shall give to the idea the definiteness which we long for ? Or we may approach the difficulty from an- other side. Just as ' personality ' corresponds with our human notion of the Being of GOD ; so prayer corresponds with our notion of the action of GOD. Prayer is a universal instinct. But when we come to analyse what we suppose to be the action of prayer addressed to GOD, it seems to involve the movement of the infinite by the finite. The instinct remains but we cannot reconcile the contradiction which it brings out. It represents to us in the most impressive shape the mystery which lies in the coexistence of the finite and the infinite. The question of prayer carries us on to con- sider the relation of GOD not only to ourselves but also to the world. Does the observed uniformity of law embody the present will of GOD acting so to speak from moment to moment ? or must we suppose that 'all creation was one act at once,' I.] The relation of GOD to phenomena. 37 and that the succession of phenomena in our experience is a consequence of the weakness of our powers as we decipher the Divine thought ? The mere effort to ponder the questions is sufficient to shew the irrelevance of much of the popular reasoning about ' miracles. ' The ' law ' under which we arrange our observations has no independent force. Ordinary and exceptional phenomena equally reveal the action of GOD, and we can have no certain assurance that we have at any time learnt all the ways of His working. Such considerations disclose the undiscover- able vastness of the order in which we are set; and through, or at least according to, which we must learn whatever the imperfection of our powers allows us to learn of GOD. The immediate contemplation of nature is overwhelming ; and the actual history of human opinion brings no assistance towards the solution of the mystery of the relation of GOD to the world and to ourselves. If we fix our thoughts on the prse-Christian period it will be seen that the religious history of men, whether Jews or Heathen, is the history of the gradual withdrawal of GOD from the world. In the first ages, as in the childhood of the race or in our own childhood, GOD seemed to be very near to men and easily to be approached. So it is 38 Tlie religious history of the world. [CHAP. written in the history of the Old Testament. The Patriarchs communed with GOD and made covenants with Him. Little by little He was withdrawn and shrouded in more awful majesty. His voice alone was heard through the Prophets. At last His name was left unspoken. An elabo- rate and splendid ritual, while it brought to some intelligible signs of spiritual promises, satisfied the desires of others ; and the hope of a further revelation of His will became the mark of a sect in the chosen people. The same kind of change passed over the creeds of the Gentile nations. At the dawn of history traditions that the gods had walked among men were still current. Afterwards local and limited deities kept alive the familiar sense of a divine presence. Then came the dissolving power of speculation. The old faith was degraded in each case into a lifeless superstition : the new faith vainly aspired to deify a mere phantom of thought. At the best the abstract notion of a Providence was suggested to those who had thirsted for a living GOD ; or some form of Pan- theism offered to the believer union with the object of his belief, while it took from him every thing to which he could direct his affections. Apart from revelation apart from the final I.] Questions asked in hope. 39 revelation in Christ this must, as it appears, be the tragic course of human experience both in the society and in the individual life. As we come to apprehend more clearly what we are and what GOD in Himself must be, the interval between the creature and the Creator opens out in its infinite depth. Reason fails and then feeling. But the craving for GOD remains unsatisfied and unextinguished. This craving is as much a fact of nature as any other fact ; and, even when the reality seems to be farthest off, man still longs for One Who is Eternal, and One Whom he can love. We can now see some of the mysteries which life necessarily carries with it. If we have ad- vanced so far in our education as to look calmly upon the conditions of our being we shall find that such questions as these are irresistibly borne in upon us: How do we regard 'self in relation to its origin and to its development ? What account do we take in our estimate of humanity of the necessary dependence of man upon circum- stances ? How do we reconcile this dependence with the sense of responsibility ? What explana- tion can we give of our restless striving after an unattainable ideal? of our invincible self-assertion in the face of the material forces of nature ? of our confident anticipations of life beyond death ? 40 Questions asked in hope. [CHAP. Or again : what is the beginning, and support and end of the world ? How can we harmonise the magnificent promises of order and unity with the existence of conflict and waste ? How do we explain that sense sublime Of something far more deeply interfused, Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns And the round ocean, and the living air And the blue sky, and in the mind of man. With what hope or aspiration do we look for- ward to a consummation of things wherein their original destiny shall be reconciled with their abiding condition ? Or yet again : How do we adjust our idea of GOD to the conditions of our own existence and to the phenomena of the world ? How do we retain it in all its intensity in spite of the age- long experience which seems to remove GOD farther from us ? How, in a word, can we gain permanence for the foundation of religious faith ? How can our Creed be invested with that vitality of form which shall grow with all the growth of men and mankind ? Truth, if it is to affect our whole life which is one and indivisible, must be expressed for us in a Fact. Theology based upon external or internal Nature, upon observation or con- I.] The effort to answer them not vain. 41 sciousness, is unstable and inadequate to our wants. It brings no decisive interpretation to conflicting phenomena. Theology based upon isolated communications of the Divine will must be relative to special circumstances. We reach out therefore to a real and abiding union of GOD and man, as real as that which Pantheism esta- blishes between the fragment and the whole: as personal as that which the simplest faith has believed to exist between the worshipper and the object of his adoration. And we do so with confidence because we trust that the system of the world answers to Truth, and that the desire of the race is, in its highest form as in each partial form, a promise of fulfilment. To ask such questions is to propose pro- blems of the greatest difficulty. It requires a serious effort even to seize their scope. Some indeed may feel impatient that they should be raised for discussion. And I gladly acknowledge that the power of the Christian life is for the most part independent of speculative inquiries. Yet there is an office of the thinker and the teacher. Each age offers its characteristic riddles; and it is by man's endeavour to solve these as they come that that fuller apprehension of the Truth is reached through which nobler action becomes 42 To face difficulties a blessing. [CHAP. i. more widely possible. If then we approach the spiritual problems of our own age, not in any conceit of intellectual superiority, but as accept- ing a grave duty and using an opportunity of service, we may reasonably look for some new blessing. To face them, to ponder them rever- ently, is to feel the glory which belongs to the nature of man unfallen : to have the assurance of ' solving them, so far as a solution is required for the guidance and inspiration of life, is to know the gift of GOD which is brought to us by the Gospel of the Resurrection. CHAPTER II. THE DUTY AND NECESSITY OF SEEKING A SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE. FROM what has been already said it must be sufficiently clear that life is beset by mysteries and to strive to banish these mysteries from thought is to impoverish our whole existence. They form the solemn background of all experi- ence ; and the exclusion of every religious theory from our view of life will not in fact make life plain and intelligible. On the contrary the fuller apprehension of the character of the mysteries which necessarily attend our being, impels us more forcibly to seek for some solution of the practical problems which they present, for such a solution as religion claims to bring. What shall we say of the complex and disordered constitution of man, of the issues of sin, of the confident expec- tation with which we look forward to a life after 44 Men seek to solve the problems of life. [CHAP. death ? What shall we say of the relation of the individual to the race and to the world in which he is placed ? What shall we say of the possi- bility of a knowledge of GOD ? No questions can be asked which have a more momentous significance than these, and all experience shews the importunate eagerness with which men, in proportion as they have grown in knowledge, have sought answers to them. The history of metaphysics is a continuous witness to the irresistible attraction which they have exer- cised upon the most profound thinkers; and whatever opinion may be entertained as to the purely metaphysical answers which have been rendered to them, the fact that such answers have found a welcome in all ages indicates the direction of human desire. This desire embodies itself in some shape or other by what appears to be a necessity of our nature ; and even those students who have endeavoured to confine themselves to physical research who have sought to obtain an understanding of the world from without and not from within have unconsciously extended their theories beyond their assumed limits. It cannot be otherwise. For these final problems, which lie at the root of Christian Doctrine, meet us in whichever direction we turn. They stand in the II.] The problems are unavoidable. 45 closest relation to life. They must be dealt with in some way or other. The kind of treatment which they receive cannot but have an important bearing upon conduct. They correspond with the development of one side of man's multiform nature. The problems, in other words, are unavoidable : they are practical : they are educational. The consideration of them enters into all thought : it has a power to direct and stimulate action : it is effective in moulding character. i. The problems are unavoidable. We can- not, that is, escape from the necessity of dealing with the questions suggested by a consideration of these final existences, self, the world, GOD ; and, this being so, the duty of investigating them is laid upon those for whom it is possible, because, with or without reflection, we must accept and act upon some decision concerning them. This is unquestionable. Every action on our part involves a judgment of some kind or other upon controversies which have been main- tained and are still maintained as to our responsi- bility, our powers, our destiny. The theory which sways our conduct, whether we know it or not, has taken shape with our own growth and become in a true sense part of ourselves. It may be simply the result of the 46 Necessity of providing for [CHAP. moral atmosphere which we breathe: it may be the fruit of sustained and arduous effort. But in either case the influence of the theory of life which we hold implicitly or avowedly is real and it is effective. However indifferent we may be to independent speculation, the average opinion, if the phrase may be used, which we share repre- sents the issues of long and vehement controversies. It expresses fairly, if on a low level, what has been ascertained in the past from the interpretation of consciousness in the light of history including all that is contained in the Bible as to our freedom, and as to our relation to the finite and the infinite. And this popular Creed is never stationary. The inner and outer boundaries of knowledge are ever advanced without cessation or break. It is as true in metaphysics as it is in physics that the goal of yesterday is the starting-post of to-day, though the repetition of identical terms in the former case may suggest the simple recurrence of ideas. But no such literal recurrence is possible. Each fresh discovery as to the relations of the com- plex elements which go to form our personality; or as to the limits of variation to which our powers and faculties are open under given circumstances ; or as to the dependence of thought upon external conditions ; or as to the most general formulae under which the phenomena of being can be II.] growth of new opinions. 47 grouped ; or as to the ultimate connexion and unity of life : must sooner or later pass into the universal heritage of men ; and when the results of science thus become, as they do become, with more or less delay, an element in the circumstances under which men think and move, they are continuously effective as moral forces. The incorporation of such physical and historical and moral discoveries or revelations, as we may prefer to call them, into the common Creed, must take place, but it may take place in different ways, silently so that indifferent spectators are unaware of the change which is going on about them, or by a sharp crisis of conflict which shakes faith to its foundations. The true Theologian therefore will look with vigilant sympathy in every direction for each fragment which can be added to his treasure. Those who are called upon to teach the study of Theology will acknowledge that it is their office to prepare the way for the admission of new aspects of Truth into the current estimate of life, and to provide against the misconceptions of impatient controversy, and the waste of secta- rianism. And those students of Theology who have the opportunity will strive from the first and with glad willingness to assimilate the acquisitions of inquiry. In some way or other both teacher and student must acknowledge in time the power 48 Action influenced [CHAP. of the new influences. It is only left for them to choose whether they will do so with ready fore- sight, or simply under that blind pressure which is disastrous in proportion as it is alarming. ii. This is the choice which lies before us ; and the importance of the choice is at once appre- hended in its true extent, if we observe that these ultimate problems of being, both in their most general form and in their details, carry with them direct practical consequences. All experience goes to shew that conduct in the long run corresponds with belief. The public opinion which prevails in a nation or a class is more powerful to repress and to urge than legal sanctions of punishment and reward. The coercion of law is effective only so far as the law embodies a dominant opinion ; and, as a natural corollary, law is actually a little behind popular opinion. But a dominant opinion sooner or later finds expression in law by the enactment of restrictions or by the removal of them. This unquestionable principle carries with it- momentous consequences. If it could be esta- blished that man's actions are the necessary result of his individual constitution and his circum- stances, in such a sense that he has no real control over them, morality would be at an end. If it II.] by opinion. 49 could be shewn that such a crisis as death makes it inconceivable that our personal consciousness should survive the change, then it would inevit- ably follow that the aim of life would be repre- sented by that which is individually attainable within the sensible limits of life. The significance of moral education as the preparation of characters and powers for use in another order would cease to exist. If it could be shewn that the idea of a supreme righteous Governor is against reason and this conviction were to become current, the per- sonal notion of pleasure would be the one standard of appeal. Hitherto such theories as necessity, or absolute mortality, or atheism, have been main- tained only by a few who have been at once dis- ciplined and restrained by the influence of opposite beliefs, but even so the issues to which they lead have been not obscurely indicated. The splendid visions, in which some modern speculators have indulged, of a religion of humanity capable of moving men to self-sacrifice and to enthusiasm for issues indefinitely remote, seem to be nothing but reflections of Christianity : let the light of the Incarnation be quenched, and they will at once vanish. At any rate there is not the least evidence in favour of their intrinsic and independent efficacy over conduct. w. G. L. 4 50 The moral standard of action. [CHAP. One or two simple considerations will set this conclusion in a clearer light. How, for example, do we gain a moral standard of action ? If we put out of account the belief in GOD and a future life it does not appear what relation can be established between different kinds of present desires and pleasures. It may be quite true that certain gene- ral results of a character desirable for mankind at large follow from certain lines of individual action, but that simple fact is no adequate reason why an individual should not, if he is able, dis- regard these for the sake of an immediate pleasure to himself. Why is he to sacrifice himself for others ? Is he not, as far as he knows, the centre and measure of things ? There is at least no sufficient evidence that the common happiness is what any particular man is bound to prefer ; and he may fairly say that he is the sole judge of what gives happiness to himself. But if we introduce the idea of GOD as a moral Governor into our view of the world, we are constrained to believe that He will in some way manifest Himself, and, if so, we cannot doubt that the 'purpose' which runs through the sum of life, though it is frequently obscured in the individual life, is part of this manifestation. We can then reasonably urge that the intuitions of ii.] Conception of GOD as a Moral Governor. 51 our own minds and the general tendencies which we observe in life are indications of His will, and thus there is at once a sufficient ground for ren- dering obedience to them at all cost. We cannot act as if we severally were measures of all things. The whole creation claims our regard and our service. Virtue, that is, the fulfilment of the will of GOD as it is made known to us, is a duty and not an open question. If we pause here, the spectacle of the world is still clouded with sadness though we are no longer disturbed by uncertainty as to our duty. We go farther therefore, and take account of the idea of a future life. If this be held firmly per- plexities of life at least cease to be inexplicable. It is a sufficient support in perplexity to feel that we see only a fragment of a vast scheme; for if there are signs of advance towards a harmony of creation now, there is nothing arbitrary in the supposition that hereafter the great end will be reached. We are enabled to regard the course of things, so to speak, from the side of GOD and not only from the side of man. Scope is given for the exercise of an infinite power commensurate with infinite love. Man's aspirations and failures are met by divine wisdom. Hope comes to the sup- port of duty. There is indeed no promise of an 42 52 A future life. [CHAP. immediate and universal victory of good. Things may continue in the new order to represent a progress through conflict; but, even if we are justified in extending to another sphere the con- ditions of our earthly discipline, nothing need be lost of that which has been gained here, and the conflict will to this extent be continued under more favourable conditions. In this way we can see how a belief in the moral government of GOD and in a future life partial and preliminary solutions of the problems of humanity influence action, and give stability and a certain grandeur to the ideas by which modern society is ruled ; but so far we obtain no light upon our connexion one with another, or upon the conflict between the elements of our own nature and the disorders without us and within us. For this we must look to revelation. And here the light which we need flows, and, as I believe, flows only from the fact of the Incarnation. If then we pass from the intuitional to the historical elements of religion, in order to realise the practical effect of belief upon conduct, it becomes evident that if we hold that the Son of GOD took man's nature upon Him, we recognise a new and ineffaceable relation between man and man. We are assured by that fact that what II.] The Incarnation and Atonement 53 binds us together is stronger than all that tends to separate us : that there is in all men a poten- tiality of blessedness beyond our imagination : that the unity of the race is something more than an abstraction. Love comes to quicken hope. And, still more than this, the same fact presents the disorders of life as intrusive and remediable, as being the violation of our nature and not belonging to its essence. The Incarna- tion exhibits to us the purpose of Creation con- summated in a glory won through voluntary humiliation and suffering. This belief carries with it momentous consequences. It shews evil in its final character as sin, lawlessness, selfish- ness, so conquered for us that we can appropriate the fruits of the conquest. In the Passion and in the Resurrection we see the last issues of life, as it were, from man's side and from the side of GOD ; and we welcome the assurance that human self-assertion is powerless before Divine love. Faith comes to crown life. These simple illustrations will shew how our view of the solution of the problems of life in its broadest aspect must have a deep practical significance for each one who accepts any particu- lar solution of them and so far as he accepts it. 54- Effect of personal belief. [CHAP. But the effect of the solution does not stop with the man who has appropriated it. It extends through him to a wider circle. Personal belief alone can leaven society. Popular opinion de- pends for its vitality upon the intensity of indi- vidual opinion. And though an opinion which has once found acceptance commonly retains its form for a time when its real supports have been removed; yet, if it be so, the collapse when it comes, will be more startling and complete. The reflection needs to be laid to heart at the present time, because there is a growing inclination on the part of many influential teachers to represent the morality of Christianity as independent of the theology of Christianity. No judgment can be more at variance with the teaching of history. Our civilisation both in its gentleness and in its strength is due to the Christian faith and has been supported by Christian institutions. What- ever we owe to non-Christian sources comes to us through a Christian atmosphere and is steeped in Christian thought. The form must soon pass into corruption if the spirit be withdrawn. We may then be reasonably stirred to self-questioning when we observe everywhere a general vagueness in religious thought, an unconscious appropria- tion of results apart from their conditions. The necessity of analysing our convictions and of test- II.] Further definition of the idea of GOD. 55 ing the application of them is forced upon us. Our Creed may be but a mere vesture cast over a dead figure and not an inspiring power: it may be only the ghost of a faith which we have killed. This being so it may be worth while to carry the illustrations which I have taken one degree farther in definition. The same law which holds good of the effect of the ideas of GOD, and of a future life and of the Incarnation in their most general form, holds good also of the details of the view under which they are realised. Let the idea of GOD be extended so as to include not only the notion of a righteous government but also that of a present and personal relationship with man. We shall see at once that the aspect of the world will be changed. The conviction of the possibility of obtaining help in the arduous work of life will be added to the conviction of the paramount claims of virtue. Prayer will become a reality. Substitute again the Christian doctrine of the Resurrection of the Body for the heathen guess of the Immortality of the Soul, and the effect upon life will be only limited by our power of realising the truth. The future will in a true 56 The Resurrection and Incarnation. [CHAP. sense be made present. The conviction of con- tinuity will be extended to all the elements of our being without being confined to any special organisation in which they are united. Actions and words will be guided and disciplined at every moment by a living consciousness of their in- evitable endurance with us as parts of ourselves. Or again : if we pass from the general state- ment of the fact of the Incarnation to the more precise apprehension of the conditions under which it is presented to us, we shall see that each typical mode of expressing the truth must carry with it corollaries of far-reaching import- ance. It is not an indifferent detail of scholas- ticism whether we place the Lord's Personality in His human or in His Divine nature. Our view of the Atonement and our conception of our own relation to the Father will depend upon it. Nothing at first sight could appear more remote from practice than the question whether the Lord's human nature is individually personal or not. Yet more careful reflection shews that our true sense of our own relation to Him as our Head depends upon the fact that He is not one man among many men, but the One in whom all find their fragmentary being made capable of reconciliation in a higher Personality. ii.] Moral influence of dogma. 57 It would be easy to pursue these considera- tions into still minuter details. Patient investi- gation will shew that no doctrine can be without a bearing upon action. It is of course possible to petrify a doctrine into an outward formula: to change that into a mere cloke which ought to be an informing force : but this degradation of a Creed springs from the inability or unwillingness of men to treat it as a thing of life and not from the inherent character of the Creed itself. The influence of a dogma may be good or bad that is an important criterion of dogma with which we are not now concerned but if the dogma be truly maintained it will have a moral value of some kind. Every religion, and every sect of every religion, has its characteristic form of life, and if the peculiarities of these forms are smoothed away by time it is only because the type of belief to which they correspond has ceased to retain its integrity and sharpness. Or to go back to the point from which we started. As long as an opinion on any of the great mysteries of self, the world and GOD is a reality for those who entertain it, and not a conventional phrase, it will be a moral power. And, as we have seen, we are so made that we must inquire into these mysteries or receive 58 Dogma a necessity for us. [CHAP. opinions on them from others. We cannot as a matter of fact avoid speculating or acting upon judgments as to the questions Whence? What? Whither? We cannot, without a forcible effort, acquiesce in the conclusion that the questions are insoluble enigmas. If we do acquiesce in it, our whole life will be modified by the confession of blank negation. On the other hand, it is at our peril that we rest in false or imperfect answers. Error and imperfection in such a case must issue in lives which are faulty or maimed where they might have been nobler and more complete. The opinions which a man holds are important posi- tively and negatively: positively, if the opinions find their corresponding expression in action, nega- tively, if they be retained as a mere fashion of thought, and so be emptied of their natural power. Right Doctrine is an inexhaustible spring of strength if it be translated into deed : it is a paralysis if it be held as an intellectual notion. Nor can we conceive any impediment to the fulfilment of duty more fatal than the outward retention of a formal Creed under such conditions that each article in it is maintained deliberately in theory without regard to its moral realisation. iii. It is, I repeat, a necessity of our nature and of our circumstances that we should deal in II.] Action not independent of opinion. 59 some way with the great mysteries of being ; and yet further it cannot but be that if we deal with them honestly and thoroughly our theories will influence our conduct. It may however be said that whatever theory we hold, observation and experience will impose upon us the same general rules of action : that even if we maintain speculatively the extremest doctrine of necessity, we shall be treated by others, and ourselves treat others, as free in the sense of responsible : that if we regard the external world as being nothing but the shadow of our own minds, we shall still heed as carefully as other men every ' law ' of nature : that whether we refer the order of the universe to a Supreme Lord or not, we shall give ourselves loyally to the fulfil- ment of those offices which appear to be marked out for us when we take a large view of the general course of things. I have already touched upon some of these assertions; and I would again urge as a general reply to this form of argument that the average belief which modifies the application of specula- tive views to conduct is due to the presence or to the traditional influence of personal conviction ; and that if there were any energetic and wide- spread denial of our freedom or of the uniformity 60 Character moulded by belief. [CHAP. of natural laws or of the Being of GOD, it is by no means clear that our actual conduct would be what it is. But I do not wish to attempt now to point out the limitations to which such statements as I have supposed are subject. I am willing to let them for the moment pass without challenge as without acceptance. Yet even so, if they hold true in the widest possible sense, the results obtained do not cover the ground which belief occupies. Such practical rules touch only upon outward acts as subject to outward control. They leave out of consideration some of the most important elements which go to the for- mation of character. And our actions personally are of importance only in relation to character. It is indeed needless to insist at length upon the momentous consequences of character. The constitution of society is such that under every form of government the moving power will be in the hands of few. For these few the final spring of power is conviction ; and conviction is the practical realisation of belief. In other words the control of men the capacity for guiding, and, if need be, for coercing the ignorant, the weak and the indifferent, for guiding that is at present the mass of men, will depend upon opinion which cor- II.] Power of character real if latent 61 responds with a definite theory of things. And such opinion extends far beyond appreciable action. To take the first case supposed. A necessitarian and his adversary will do on the supposition exactly the same actions, and yet they will be wholly different men. Legislation again, to touch another point, cannot distinguish between the obedience of resignation and the obedience of enthusiasm ; but it is obvious that there is an immeasurable differ- ence between the citizen who accepts a burden from which he cannot escape and the citizen who believes that he is contributing of his own to the furtherance of a great cause. The characters of two such men are practically incommensurable. Their power and their ten- dency to influence others are wholly different. In any great crisis they would be revealed, as being in fact what they are, whether the time of shewing them openly comes or not. Thus their potential difference with regard to society and to the future is enormous. Their actual difference in themselves with regard to the past is equally great. For the one repentance, remorse, thank- fulness, devotion will be delusions to be extirpated, for the other they will be precious instruments of discipline and encouragement. 62 Influence of our view of the world [CHAP. Again : it may be quite true that we shall follow observed laws, as far as we have appre- hended them, with a care proportioned to our knowledge, whatever may be our theory of the universe without us. But the effect of the world upon our imagination, and through imagination upon our character, will depend upon the view which we take of its relation to ourselves and to GOD. If we regard it as inextricably bound up with man, as waiting, in some sense, for the true fulfilment of his destiny, as suffering from his failures, as contributing to the fulness of one life, it is evident that our attitude towards it will be different from that of students who acknowledge no present moral relationship and no permanent connexion between man and the rest of creation, who regard the region of finite being open to us as a field simply for intellectual research. To him who believes that all creation is a living revelation of GOD, that which phenomena serve to indicate will be far more precious than that which we can define in them by isolating parts of the moving whole and treating them as fixed. Such a faith in the divine life of things, which can become most real, is capable of producing in him who holds it habits of reverence and tenderness and sympathy which profoundly affect his whole tone of thought and temper and conduct. Whether II.] through imagination. 63 for good or for evil there is an almost infinite difference of character between the pedlar for whom the primrose 'a yellow primrose is and nothing more ' and the poet to whom the meanest flower that blows can give Thoughts that do often lie too deep for tears. Again : nothing, I believe, can be more clear than that the conclusion as to rules of action, apart from all considerations of effective motive and sanction, will be the same whether we follow the method of a wide utilitarianism or base our system of morality on intuitional ideas of right. But though it may be, as I am ready to grant, of no moment as to laying down rules of action what abstract theory we hold as to the basis of morality ; it is of the greatest moment as to character whether we regard our rules as determined by reference to ourselves and by what we can see of their working, or by their relation to some infinitely larger order in which we are a part : whether, that is, we call a- thing good because it is seen to be useful within the present sphere of our experience or because we hold that it is in conformity with an absolute law of the working of which we see as yet but little. Reflections of the same kind apply to all 64 Importance of what we think. [CHAP. other articles of belief, even the most abstract. These have not only an effect upon outward action, but also upon those inward processes of thought and feeling which fashion our permanent constitution. In this respect what we think of things is at least as important as what we do. We are called upon in a word to pursue truth in opinion not less than truth in action : to discipline and elevate the imagination : to purify and ennoble the affections : to reach forward in every direction to a fuller and more perfect knowledge of the ways of GOD within us and without us. If then we turn aside from a reverent contemplation of the mysteries of life, if we refuse to throw upon them the light which we can gather, if we make no effort to realise their ennobling magnificence because we suppose, for the most part falsely, that their grandeur has no practical significance ; we leave undone that which, according to our oppor- tunities, we are bound to do. We take to ourselves a mutilated character. We suffer one great part of ourselves to remain undisciplined, unstrength- ened, unused, which (as we may reasonably believe) if not on earth yet in some larger field of being, will require for the fulfilment of its office, the results of that exercise which our present con- ditions are fitted to supply. CHAPTER III. THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH A SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMS MUST BE SOUGHT. OUR inquiries hitherto have established two important conclusions, (1) that we are placed in the midst of mysteries, and that we carry within ourselves mysteries, from which escape is impossible ; and (2) that we are so made and so placed that we are constrained to look upon them, to seek and to shape some solution of them, to live according as we interpret them. The problems of life, in a word, are inevitable ; and the answers which they receive are of the most direct practical importance to those who render them. We have now to consider the conditions under which the answer to these problems must be sought. And I do not think that I can better introduce what I have to say upon the subject in relation to present difficulties than by W. G. L. 66 Dangers from dominant influences. [CHAP. a reference to the famous passage of the Novum Organum in which Bacon sums up the prolific sources of 'the phantoms of the cave.' These false and misleading spectres, which simulate the form of Truth, spring, he tells us, for the most part from certain prevailing views, from an excessive passion for synthesis or analysis, from a preference for some particular period in the history of the world, from " a telescopic or micro- scopic character" of mind. Now I am by no means prepared to maintain that we are not haunted still by spectres of the tribe, of the market and of the theatre : that we do not suffer from the preponderating influence of the objects of sense, from the misunderstanding of current terms, from the attractiveness of brilliant theories ; but the spectres of the cave seem to crowd about us just now in greater numbers than all these and to disturb our judgment more deeply, partly by their fictitious terrors and partly by their unsubstantial beauty. Or to drop the image and speak plainly, there seems to be a growing danger lest all facts should be forced into one category, lest one method of investigation should be armed with an absolute despotism, lest one verifying test should be transformed into a universal necessity. in.] Different kinds of Truth. 67 It is then of primary importance to guard ourselves against this danger when we enter upon the study of Religion or Theology. And that we may learn to do so the more completely we must still keep our attention fixed upon the broadest aspects of things. By the help of this discipline we shall be enabled at once to see that we are constrained in our speculations to distinguish several distinct groups of phenomena which rest on separate bases, which lead to results differing essentially in kind, which must be verified by characteristic proofs : to see that there are various classes of Truths which are marked not by different degrees of certainty, but by different kinds of certainty : that the word ' science ' has a manifold application : that Theology is most really a posi- tive science based upon its own special facts, and pursued according to its own proper method. The reflections which I desire to suggest will group themselves, as before, round the three final elements of being self, the world, and GOD ; and it will be my general object to shew that the type of science which belongs to each of these ultimate divisions of the objects of thought is absolutely distinct ; and that each more complex science presupposes and rests upon that which is simpler and more general. 52 68 Mathematical truth. [CHAP. i. In the first place then a man may regard himself alone, and isolate the laws of limitation under which his impressions are received from the objects which stimulate his senses. The ideas of time and space, of succession and extension, when once apprehended in their most simple and absolute form become the sufficient foundation for wide and complicated conclusions. When the ideas have once been called into play, there is no longer any need that the inquirer should turn a single thought to phenomena. An experiment may illustrate one of his results, but it is impos- sible to conceive any experiment which could either confirm his legitimate deductions or shake them. The utmost developments of the relations of number and figure are absolute for man. The facts with which he deals in them are not only assumed to be constant : for him they are constant. Nothing, as long as he is what he is, can interfere with the certainty of his deductions. But we must observe that we are not justified in extending the limitations of our perceptions to any other order of beings. Obviously we cannot extend them to an Infinite Being. They may be shadows or fragments of something larger, grander, immeasur- ably more comprehensive, into which they are capable of being taken up and resolved. But however this may be, we cannot give definiteness ill.] Physical truth. 69 f to such thoughts ; and we come back to the marks *-* of our primary group of sciences. The sphere is man himself. The subject is the characteristic /^ 0J> limitations of his perceptions. The method is /^ deductive. The verification of the results lies in ^ the possibility of their resolution into elements - of which the opposite is unthinkable. ii. But man cannot rest here. He is con- strained to look continuously without. He regards self, and he regards the world. And however much he may be tempted to mould the phenomena of the world into some preconceived shape, he is soon compelled to abandon the attempt. Prior to observation he is utterly unable to predict the laws which represent the action of the various forces about him. To the last he has no complete assurance that he has detected all the forces which are at work and ready to reveal themselves. But by the accumulation of experience he can do much in grouping vast series of phenomena under adequate formulas; and just as he isolates /I,/K />.- the abstract conditions of observation (conditions f,^//" of time and space) from the concrete facts through , which they are made known to men, he can isolate also in imagination the operation of each force; and when he has done so, but not till then, the method of deduction can be applied to data which 70 Assumptions involved [CHAP. are treated separately as absolute. The assumed conditions are, of course, in this case imaginary ; but where the actual phenomena are resolvable into the resultants of few elements the recurrence of the phenomena can be predicted with an assur- ance proportioned to their simplicity. But the certainty obtainable in this region is separated by an impassable chasm from the certainty which belongs to the former group of facts. It reposes on a twofold assumption, which from the nature of the case can never cease to be an assumption. It is assumed that the observed law is constant, and it is assumed that no force hitherto unperceived will hereafter interfere with the observed manifestation of the law. Now even as things are, late physical researches as we have already seen suggest grounds for believing that the present state of the world could not have come about from the uniform action of the forces which we can now observe ; and the fact that energy is being constantly dissipated, that is, I imagine, stored up though not used, seems to indicate that provision is being made for some hitherto unknown revelation of being. Perhaps indeed, if I may venture on a conjecture, the phenomena of physics may be conceived of best as falling under some vast progressive periodic cycles, an ascending in.] in Physical law. 71 spiral as it were, though for the infinitesimal fragments of their course during which we can observe them, no appreciable error is made by assuming the constancy of the laws which express their general form. However I have no right to enter further on this field, and all that I desire to indicate is that we have within it a new kind of phenomena, subject to new conditions only partially discover- able in their relations to ourselves, a new method of inquiry, a new test of verification. The sphere is external nature : the method is inductive : the verification is experiment and prediction : while at the same time the former sphere, the former method, the former test underlie these, and is unmodifiable by them. Physical Truth, in a word, is not homogeneous with mathematical Truth, but all physical results involve a mathematical foundation. They rest, that is, in their expression upon the limitations of succession. But we must go further. Hitherto we have considered only the manifestation of inor- ganic being. All investigation tends to confirm the instinct which separates physical force from life. Omne vivum ex vivo is a principle which brings us face to face with a new series of 72 Historical truth constrasted with [CHAP. phenomena. And even if future researches should shew that there is, or make it probable that there has been, an evolution of life from matter, the region of life will still remain clearly distinct. We have here to deal with the fullest development of phenomena and not with their inchoate stage. In the case of living bodies then all the observed laws of inorganic being hold good so far as these bodies can be considered simply as inorganic, but no further. All the laws which limit our observation hold good in the deductions which can be drawn from them. But life itself is an element wholly different in order from those with which we have dealt hitherto. The variety, the complexity, the cumulative transmission of its manifestations, render experiment and prediction for the most part nugatory. This is true both of the single life and of the sum of being. We cannot here, except in the broadest generalizations, assume permanence in the conditions of the problem : we cannot assume permanence in the mysterious energy of life itself: we cannot affect to leave out of consideration the interference of individual influences, which, from whatever source they spring, are at least incalculable. We find our- selves in the presence of a movement due to an immeasurable combination of concurrent or con- flicting powers. It is a grand truth that ' the III.] Mathematical and Physical truth. 73 dead rule the living,' but they rule them and they do no more. No despot however absolute could destroy the personality of his subjects. The Truth of life then, Historical Truth, must be generically different in kind from Mathematical or Physical Truth. Historical Truth is con- cerned primarily with the reality of specific facts. Physical Truth is concerned primarily with the coordination of groups of facts. The basis of the one is testimony which is unique, the basis of the other is experiment which can be repeated. The particular incident is in the first case a fragment of a continuous growth, in the second it is an example of that which is for us an unchanging law. No doubt our conviction of Physical Truth and of Historical Truth agrees in this that in both cases the conviction admits of degrees of certainty, but the degrees depend upon wholly different conditions. The adequacy of the testimony is the measure of historical certainty : the adequacy of the experiments is the measure of physical certainty. Here then we have a new science. The sphere is human life, the method is the investigation of the records of the past and present : the verifies- tion rests on testimony taken in connexion with * 74 Truths relating to [CHAP. the analogy of experience. I am not concerned to inquire why we are so constituted as to believe testimony any more than why we are so constituted as to accept a universal statement based upon a limited induction. What seems to be of chief importance is, that being what we are, we do and must accept as true facts which we cannot bring to the test of experiment, facts which by their very nature are incapable of repetition. It is simply impossible to apply to history the method or the test of physics : but certainty is equally attainable in both cases for the uses of human life, though it represents the result of different processes. iii. I have touched upon what appear to be the characteristics of the different kinds of certainty corresponding respectively with the conclusions which flow from the limitations of our own nature, from our direct observation, according to these limitations of the inorganic world, and from the indirect record of the past experience of life. But there is yet another sphere of know- ledge. The existence of the personal ' I ' and of ^ the external world are two self-luminous truths. And there is also a third, which rests, as we have seen, on the same foundation of consciousness, that is, the Being of GOD. In other words man stands in a present and abiding relationship with in.] our knowledge of GOD. 75 an unseen and eternal as well as with a seen and temporal order. His individual life is directly connected with a vaster life which is its source, and the world on which he looks is part of a universe of being which is made known through it only partially, if really. Here then there is room for another type of Truth, for another method of inquiry, for another kind of certainty. We are brought to the threshold of a new science, the positive science of Theology, which like the other sciences must have its own appropriate facts. How then can we obtain these facts ? How can we be assured that they are facts ? How can we use them as the basis of further deductions and generalisations ? Before I attempt to answer these questions I must mark three laws which we have ob- served in our consideration of the mathematical, physical, and vital sciences. The first is, that the fundamental facts of each science and of each type of science are in themselves respectively independent of every other science and of every other type of science. We cannot, for instance, predict by the help of any deductions from the conceptions of time and space what will be the character of the solar system. The law of gravi- tation again cannot form the sufficient basis of 76 General laws applicable to [CHAP. the law of chemical combination or of laws of action. There may be an undiscovered unity, as there is certainly a marvellous harmony, between the different laws when they are approximately understood, but it is impossible to pass directly from one science to another. The attempt to do so would be an attempt on a greater or less scale to construct a world a priori. The second law is, that in any complex phe- nomenon we can isolate by abstraction those elements which belong to the domain of a parti- cular science, and then the law and method of the particular science will so far find a right and complete application to the phenomenon in ques- tion. For example, if the hand describes a curve under definite conditions, we may consider the figure only : or the action of gravity upon the limb while describing it, both in vacuo and in a resisting medium of an assumed or of a deter- mined character : or the internal changes in the living frame attendant upon the action : or the record of the movement given by a spectator. The problems which are thus raised are perfectly distinct and must be treated independently if we are to obtain a true conception of the whole action. Physiology is unable to fix the properties in.] different Sciences. 77 of the curve, and conversely geometry throws no light on the processes of life. The third law is, that the method which is followed in the pursuit of Truth is essentially different in the groups of sciences which belong to self and to the world. The method which deals with the problems involved in the universal / ^^ - i limitations of human observation is intuitive v-txf 13^ as to the fundamental facts and deductive in the application of them : the method which deals with the problems of the world whether physical or vital is inductive, and depends for its fun- damental facts upon observation and testimony, confirmed in the one case by direct experiment and prediction, and in the other, in the largest sense, by general experience. The facts can be used as the certain basis of a deductive process only so far as it is assumed in a particular case that the phenomena with which they correspond are perfectly known and constant. If now we apply these laws to the science of Theology we shall have advanced some way towards the answer to the questions which have been proposed. We shall expect that the facts which belong to Theology as a special science will be derived from some other source than the analysis of the conditions of thought or the 78 Knowledge of GOD must come [CHAP. observation of the uniformities of the world : that there will be some ultimate faculty in man capable of deciding with certainty upon the ques- tions with which it deals : that different elements in these complex facts through which a revelation is given may be isolated and dealt with separately, but no partial investigation of the facts, so far as they fall within the domain of the inferior sciences can determine their theological value. i. Such conclusions are justified by reflec- tion and experience. For while we feel no less surely that GOD is than that we are and that the world is, and are conscious of an affinity to Him, we cannot come to a knowledge of Him from the interrogation of ourselves or of nature. We cannot deduce from an examination of our own constitution what He must be. This would be impossible in any case for an imperfect and finite creature ; and if the creature be also fallen and sinful the impossibility is intensified. We must then look without ourselves for the knowledge of GOD. But here again we cannot command at our pleasure adequate sources of information. Experiment is capable only of rare application to the complicated phenomena of life and it can have no place in regard to the will of an Infinite Being. If then we are to know GOD, He must in.] to man from GOD. 79 in His own way make Himself known to us, and we on our part must be able to recognise and to give a personal welcome to the revelation. It does not appear to be necessary to discuss the question whether GOD can reveal Himself to man, or rather whether man continuing to be what he is can receive a revelation of GOD. The possibility of a revelation is included in the idea which we have of GOD ; and finds a charac- teristic expression in the belief that man was made " in the image of GOD." This original idea belongs, as we have assumed, to the fulness of the individual life ; and it is realised more and more fully through life. It does not obtain its mature form at once either for the individual or for the race. It follows therefore that if a revelation be given to man it must also come to him through life. It will be addressed, that is, to the whole man and not to a part of man, as (for example) to the intellect or to the affections. It will, in other words, be presented in facts and not in words only. Man will learn to know more and more of GOD and this is the teaching of history and experience not by purely intellectual processes, but by intercourse with Him, by listening to His voice and interpreting the signs which He gives of His presence and His will. 80 The Revelation is given [CHAP. These facts of revelation then, these 'signs' (crr)fj,eia) in the language of the New Testament, are the fundamental facts of Theology. Either in themselves or from the circumstances of their occurrence they are such as to suggest the imme- diate presence or action of GOD, of a personal power producing results not explicable by what we observe in the ordinary course of nature. They are not properly proofs of a teaching from which they are dissociated, but the teaching itself in a limited form which appeals to men through human experience. They have a spiritual power, and, so far, they are ' spiritually discerned ' while the intellect prepares the way for this discern- ment. They indicate in all cases something of the connexion between the seen and the unseen. Theology, even in its simplest form, claims to set forth this connexion ; and Christian Theology, ( to take the completest example, of which every other Theology is in some measure a prepara- tion or a reflex, offers to us this connexion definitely established for ever in a historical manifestation of GOD in the Incarnation and Passion and Resurrection of the Lord which as it extends to the whole of life opens also an inexhaustible fountain of wisdom as our know- ledge of life becomes deeper and wider. in.] through life. 81 Thus the historical facts through which the Christian Revelation is given, are the spiritual facts of Christian Theology, which are added to what we know or can know of GOD from other sources. The events which are proclaimed as human contain also an emphatic declaration of something transcendental, of an atonement, a restored union of man and of humanity and of the world with GOD in Christ. On one side these signs the special mani- festations of the action of GOD and consequently of His character and purposes are facts. So far they fall within the domain of history, and are subject to the ordinary laws of historical investigation. But they are more than facts which belong to the visible order. As facts which belong to the visible order they can be investi- gated by the ordinary methods of criticism, but something will still remain to be apprehended by a spiritual faculty. They have a historic side inasmuch as they are events in human life, but no simply historic process can lay open their inner significance. They are capable again of a logical interpretation, but no system of deductive exposition can supersede the vital apprehension of the facts themselves. The facts which are the foundation of Theology are suggested by but W. G. L. 6 82 The signs interpreted by [CHAP. are not identical with the external phenomena through which we are made acquainted with them. They are, as is obvious in the case of the Resurrection, an interpretation of the phenomena. The outward facts become facts in this higher sense, truths without ceasing to be facts. ii. How then can we be assured that these facts are facts not only in their historical but also in their spiritual aspect ? The law of testimony will carry us to a conclusion as to the outward phenomenon. How can we be sure of its divine import ? I do not hesitate to reply that we are by nature made capable of judging on this point also. Nor is the assumption of the existence of such a power of recognition, of apprehension, of interpretation of the divine, at variance with what we have noticed hitherto. So far from this being so, the assumption corresponds with what we have actually seen in the case of induction and testimony, which serve as the foundations of physical and historical certainty. It is in no way more surprising that I should say when a moral principle is presented to me, I acknowledge this as of absolute obligation, or when a unique occur- rence is related to me, I acknowledge this as a in.] spiritual judgment. 83 divine message, than that I should say such an event has happened so many times, and therefore it will happen again, or so and so told me and therefore I believe him. The conclusion in each case seems to answer to our ultimate constitution. And though the term Faith is properly applied to the power by which we gain data as to the unseen and eternal order, there is something directly corresponding to Faith in the power by which we accept general conclusions as to what we call 'laws' of Nature and special conviction as to events of history which are equally removed from the test of sense (comp. p. 28). The proof of Revelation is then primarily \ ^personal. It springs from a realised fellowship with the unseen which we are enabled to gain. The two complementary statements credo ut in- telligam (fides prcecedit intellectum) and intelligo ut credam are both true at different points in the divine life. The one applies to the groundwork ; the other to the superstructure : the one describes the apprehension of the fundamental facts ; the other describes the expression of doctrines. Faith \ obtains the new data for reasoning, but when I ?u, the data are firmly held, then the old methods i fl become applicable. Historical facts convey new lessons when regarded in the light of the revealed 62 84> The personal proof [CHAP. relation of GOD to the world ; and, within certain limits, we can express conclusions in human lan- guage which present the truth adequately for us. The data do not modify these methods, but in- crease the materials to which they are applicable. Revelation, in a word, which gives us the characteristic data of Theology in a history, inasmuch as it comes from without us, and our being is one, presupposes and rests upon the deductive laws which express the limitation of our thoughts, and the inductive laws which express our apprehension of the phenomena of life and nature, and the laws of historical criti- cism by which we investigate the records of the past, though it has also its own peculiar method of proof. Nor is the additional process, if we may so call it, by which we gain assurance in this region of knowledge through faith more different from the inductive process by which we gain moral certainty in regard to the outward world of sense, or the process of historical criticism by which we gain moral certainty as to fresh events, than the latter processes themselves are different from the deductive process which establishes de- monstratively the consequences of the constitution of our own minds. The four or (three) processes correspond to four (or three) different orders of in.] receives wider confirmation. 85 existences ; and that which extends farthest in- cludes the results of those which deal with more limited ranges of thought. And though the proof of revelation is finally / u personal, the correspondence of the character of the revelation with the general instincts and tendencies of humanity, with what the experience of life on a large scale teaches us as to the constitution of the individual and of the race, pi gives a certain universality to the proof. At the same time the ' signs ' of revelation do not stand as isolated events in the history of the world. They also are above all things interpretative events. They illustrate what was before dark, and combine what was before scattered. They let in light to our order in such a way as to convey the conviction that there is an order of perfect light which is not inaccessible by us. These considerations meet the difficulty which rp comes from the variety of the interpretations of , ^ the subject-matter of revelation. The conviction which is primarily personal is brought to a social trial. We cannot reduce the propositions in which 1 it is expressed to elements of which the opposite j u j is unthinkable. We cannot bring them to a definite experiment. We must try them finally 86 Each higher Science [CHAP. by the test of life. And that may be justly accepted as the highest truth for man, which is shewn to be capable of calling out, disciplining, sustaining, animating with the noblest activity all the powers of man in regard to self, the world and GOD, under the greatest variety of circumstances. ' If anything human lies without the scope of a revelation to man, that revelation cannot be final. iii. We have seen that while the characteristic element in the facts which form the basis of Theology does not fall within the range of histo- rical investigation, the same law holds good in the case of Theology which we have observed before. The higher science includes all that precede, as being at once subordinate and pre- paratory to it. The science for example which deals with the action of bodies one upon another assumed to be unchanged in themselves, is in- cluded in that which deals with the action of body upon body when both are supposed to be under- going change. The science of life, to rise upwards, which takes account of phenomena peculiar to itself, treats of them in accordance with all the laws observed in inorganic bodies. When again we pass to that more complex form of human existence which for the want of a proper word we call the life of nations, and at last the life in.] rests on those below. 87 of humanity, this, which proceeds according to its own laws, is subject no less in due measure to all the laws which regulate individual existence. So too it is with the science of morality which deals with the highest problems of social and personal life as they are conditioned by the circumstances of our present existence. So too it is at last with Theology. This carries us indeed into a higher order. It has facts and laws of its own ; but these are underlaid by all the other laws which determine our powers of observa- tion and our relation to one another and to the order in which we live. In this universal principle we have the answer to our third question. Theology has Truths of which no other science can judge: , but though the fulness of these truths belongs exclusively to Theology, still Theology does not deal with them as supramundane from their j divine side, but so far as they are appreciable under the conditions of our present existence, so far as they are operative in the many phases of our actual experience. They are in all respects relative to the order which is opened to our inquiry and observation, and connect this with an order into which we cannot ourselves penetrate. They treat of the infinite reconciled to the finite and 88 All sciences in due measure [CHAP. not of the infinite in the abstract, of GOD united with man, and not of GOD in Himself. It is therefore evident that the apprehension of the Christian revelation, as a revelation, presupposes an evergrowing acquaintance with that form of being in and through which it is given. The facts of revelation do not in themselves and cannot con- stitute a theory of the external world, so far as it is offered to us for investigation by our present powers, but they connect such a theory, which is the final goal of all intellectual effort, with that which is unseen and eternal. Step by step we come to know better the constitution of man, the laws of society, the interdependence of the parts of the material universe ; and exactly as we advance in this knowledge, we can understand with surer confidence and deeper insight the import of the revelation made known to us in the Life of Christ, and in the mission of the Holy Spirit, whereby man and society and the universe are placed in a living union with GOD. And thus all the know- ledge which we can gain of the finite, all the knowledge which we can gain of man, extends and illuminates our knowledge of GOD, Who has been made known to us through the finite and in the Person of Him Who was perfect Man. Nothing therefore which enlarges our acquaint- ance with creation in its widest sense can be in.] minister to Theology. 89 indifferent to the Theologian : to him every access of truth is, io a secondary sense, a revelation ; or to the Christian, more exactly, a comment on the one absolute revelation. So it is that Theology becomes the soul of Religion. Theology is a science and Religion is the fulness of life. Theology is the crown of all the sciences, and Religion is the synthesis of all. But, as I have already said, the method of each subsidiary science must be used only so far as it is applicable. Physics will lead us to a certain point : physiology will carry us yet further : history will carry us still onwards : revelation will add that element of infinity to knowledge which gives characteristic permanence to every work and thought. Each science is supreme within its own domain. But no science can arrogate to itself the ^ exclusive possession of certainty or Truth. Nor does it appear that there is any virtue in the power of vivid illustration which belongs to Physics, for example, such as to distinguish physical conclusions as certain, when compared with the conclusions of ethics or theology. It is rather narrowness than precision of thought which confines the word knowledge to the facts which we reach in a particular way; and the student seems to wilfully abridge his heritage who 90 Usurpation of alien ground [CHAP. \ pronounces all that 'unknowable' which is not accessible by one kind of machinery. Each science, I repeat, is supreme within its own domain; but it has no sovereign authority beyond it. The certainty which man can obtain and by which he lives is manifold in kind and corresponds with each separate region of phe- nomena. There is no one method of obtaining Truth : there is no one universal test of Truth. No process can lead to a complete result in a different order from that to which it properly belongs. No conclusion from the science of matter or of life can (as far as I can see) establish any conclusion as to a point in morals or theology and conversely. A physical law will help us to present to our minds more distinctly a spiritual fact : a spiritual fact will illuminate the relations of a physical law to the moral order of the universe; but the two are absolutely distinct in their nature and in their sphere. At the same time from the inherent con- stitution of the hierarchy of Truths there is always a serious danger lest a method which happens to be eminently clear and dominant should come to be regarded as absolute and universal. The danger is the greater if the in.] by scientific methods. 91 method is openly successful in dealing with the phenomena to which it is peculiarly appro- priate. In the early and middle ages the popular method of Theology usurped authority over Physics; and now the established methods of Physics or of Biology usurp authority over Theo- logy. As we look back we can see plainly the fatal errors of the past : it is more difficult to see the equally fatal errors which are active about us now. And yet in one important respect the present confusion of methods is more perilous than that old confusion which we can at length unhesitat- ingly condemn. There is more likelihood that a method which is truly applicable in part should be regarded as decisively adequate than that a method wholly inapplicable should continue to be used. And each successive zone of phe- nomena (so to speak) of greater complexity admits of being treated up to a certain point by the method appropriate to the zone immediately below, because it includes those phenomena as the foundation upon which new data are super- added. In such a case therefore the imperfect treatment is, as far as it goes, sound and attractive, but it is essentially incomplete. The results are defective exactly in that which is 92 Theology has its own method. [CHAP. in. characteristic of the true results, while they are otherwise true in themselves. But on the other hand if the methods appropriate to a higher zone are applied to a lower, then the results are wholly fictitious. Both these faulty methods of procedure have, as has been already noticed, been actually carried into effect. The method of Theology has been applied to Physics, and the issue was mere dreams ; and now the method of Physics is applied to Theology, and the result must be of necessity the denial of all that is peculiar to Theology. True Theologians therefore will strive to guard themselves alike against the temptation to refuse to other sciences the fullest scope as far as they reach, and against the temptation to acknow- ledge that they are finally authoritative over that which does not come within their range. They will not withdraw one document which helps to define their faith from the operation of any established law of criticism, but they will refuse to admit that any historical inquiry can decide that there is no revelation. They will refuse to accept as an axiom (or a postulate) that every record which attests a revelation must be false. CHAPTER IV. THE WORK OF THE PRE-CHRISTIAN NATIONS TO- WARDS THE SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEMS OF LIFE. WE have already seen in a rapid survey what are the typical mysteries which underlie human life, what are the forces which constrain us to consider them, what are the conditions under which we must seek for their solution. Christi- anity the Gospel of the Resurrection is as I have already said the complete answer to all our questionings, so far as we can receive an answer at present, an answer which we are slowly spelling out through the growing experience of the life of the Church. But before this complete answer was given other answers were made, partial and tentative, which offer for our study the most solemn aspect of ancient history. Some of these answers I propose now to examine summarily. If we can in any way apprehend them clearly, we 94 We require a religious solution [CHAP. shall understand better than by any other method both the wants of man, and the resources which he has himself for supplying them, and the extent to which his natural endowments are able to satisfy his wants. But before we endeavour to characterise the chief solutions which have been proposed for the riddle of life apart from Christianity, it is neces- sary to define again the character of the solution which we require, and to determine the general principles on which we may treat the religions of the world as ancillary to and illustrative of the gospel. We require then briefly a religious solution : a solution which shall deal with the great ques- tions of our being and our destiny in relation to thought and action and feeling. The Truth at which we aim must take account of the conditions of existence and define the way of conduct. It is not for speculation only: so far Truth is the subject of philosophy. It is not for discipline only: so far it is the subject of ethics. It is not for embodiment only : so far it is the subject of art. Religion in its completeness is the harmony of the three, philosophy, ethics, and art, blended into one by a spiritual power, by a consecration at once personal and absolute. The direction of iv.] of the problems of life. 95 philosophy, to express the thought somewhat differently is theoretic and its end is the True, as the word is applied to knowledge : the direction -.Wf /3 of Ethics is practical, and its end is the Good : the /j la direction of Art is representative, and its end is the Beautiful. Religion includes these three ends * but adds to them that in which they find their consecration, the Holy. The Holy brings an infinite sanction and meaning to that which is otherwise finite and relative. It expresses not only a complete inward peace but also an essen- tial fellowship with GOD. The perfect religion, the perfect solution of the mysteries of life, will offer these elements and aims in absolute adjustment and efficacy ; and each element and aim will exist, at least in a rudi- mentary form, in every religion. But from our inherent incompleteness and faultiness now one element and now another will be unduly promi- nent. It may be thought or will or feeling which is in excess, and then there will follow the dangers of dogmatism or moralism or mysticism. Every religion and every age offers illustrations of such one-sided developments ; and it is easy to see through these very exaggerations that if religion is to correspond with the fulness of life the three constituents are essential to its complete activity ; 96 The idea of religion. [CHAP. and that each one severally needs the other two for its own proper realisation. Such considerations serve also to indicate a comprehensive definition of religion. It has been defined as the consciousness of dependence : as right action; and as knowledge. In these several conceptions there is some confusion from the fundamental differences in the point of sight from which religion may be regarded. Religion may be regarded as a tendency, a potential energy or faculty in man, or as a system, a view, of life corresponding to some stage of the development of this tendency, or as the external expression which it finds in personal conduct. Thus all the definitions given above contain a fragment of truth though they deal severally with one side of the truth only. All point to a harmony of being as the final aim towards which man reaches out as born for religion, and which re- ligions seek to represent in some partial and yet intelligible form. Even the rudest demon- worship contains the germ of this feeling by which the worshipper seeks to be at one with some power which is adverse to him. It is a witness to some- thing in man by which he is naturally constituted to feel after a harmonious fellowship with all that of which he is conscious, with the unseen, and iv.] The end of religion. 97 with the infinite, no less than with the seen and the material. From one side then religion may be defined to be the active expression of that element in man, or rather perhaps of his whole being more or less concordantly united, by which he strives to realise a harmony in all things : and, from the other side, a religion is that view of all things which corresponds under particular circumstances with his nature as constituted to seek after this harmony. Starting then from the idea of a gerfect harmony as the final aim of religion, we see that its immediate purpose is to bind together that which is scattered, as things are, or discordant, and to reunite that which has been disarranged or severed. This being so it is evident that in order to reach to the full breadth of the conception of religion we must go beyond man himself. Not only is there a division and discord in self: there is also a division and discord between self and the world, and between self and GOD. Religion claims to deal with these external discords no less than with the discord within us. Religion must be capable of bringing reconciliation and order to those elements and relations of our being which give rise to the widest and most enduring conflicts. It must take account of the continuity of life by /"*, W. G. L. 7 98 The idea of religion [CHAP. which we are united with the past and with the future. It must take account of the solidarity of life by which at any one time we are united in one real whole. It must take account of the totality of life by which all the parts of creation are united in a mutual, though dimly seen, inter- dependence. And thus we come at last to a general notion of its office to reconcile, to co- ordinate, to discipline, to hallow: to reconcile man and GOD, to coordinate man and the world, to discipline the individual, to hallow all life by the recognition of a divine presence and a divine will. This then is our first point : we require for the satisfaction of wants which belong to our constitu- tion a religious solution of the mysteries by which we are surrounded: a solution which shall bring into a harmonious relation the past, the present, and the future, the seen and the unseen, the conflicting elements of our personal nature. The facts of personal and social life lead us to expect that the end which we are made to seek will not be reached without long and painful efforts, without failures, partial attainments, relapses. They encourage us to believe that nothing will be lost in which the spirit of man has answered however imperfectly to the Spirit of GOD. They move us to read as IV.] to be traced in history. 99 we can the lessons of human experience in the slow unfolding of religious ideas, for the widening and strengthening of our divine convictions. We turn therefore to the long records of the past to learn how men have solved or rather have tried to solve the problems which, as we have seen, must meet them more or less distinctly in the course of life. The past is in this respect the portraiture of humanity. It shews what man is and what he strives to gain. We could not have determined a priori what form these final ques- tions of being would take, and still less what answers would be rendered to them. Each man is only able to realise a small fragment of the wants, the feelings, the aspirations of the race. But in the accumulated experience of ages we see legibly written the fuller tendencies, the more varied strivings, the manifold failures and vic- tories of our common nature. The religious character of man no less than his social or his intellectual character is to be sought, not in speculation first, but in the actual observation of the facts of his continuous development. This consideration alone must be sufficient to impress upon the student of Christian Theology the necessity of striving, as opportunity may be given, to understand the essential ideas of faiths, however strange or even repulsive, in which his 72 100 The history of religion parallel [CHAP. fellow-men have lived and died. These faiths all shew something of what man is, and of what man has made of man, though GOD be not far from each one. The religious history of the world is the very soul of history; and it speaks to the soul. It speaks perhaps with eloquent pathos through some iso- lated monument which is the sole record of a race that has passed away, as, for example, through those figures from Easter Island in front of which we pass to the treasures of our British Museum. That epitome of a ' Natural Theology ' wrought in stone is a fitting preface to the records of human achievement throughout the ages. Such a search for the religious characteristics of man in the past history of religion is in many respects parallel to the search for the intellectual characteristics of man in the history of the many languages through which the divided nations have expressed their thoughts. A religion and a lan- guage even in their simplest forms are witnesses to necessities of man's constitution, and in some sense they are also prophecies of the fuller satis- faction which the wants out of which they spring will obtain in due time. No one language exhausts man's capacity for defining, combining, subordi- nating objects of thought, but all languages together give a lively and rich picture of his iv.] to the history of language. 101 certain and yet gradual advance in innumerable different paths towards the fulness of intellectual development. So too it is with the many faiths and observances which men have spontaneously adopted. These in due measure reveal something of his religious powers and needs. Each race bears actual historical witness to the reality of some particular phase of religious opinion: of noble endeavour as it may be, or of disastrous delusion, or of sad defeat, or of advancing conquest. And if this be so we shall in a certain degree approximate towards a true conception of the religion which corresponds with man's nature by a review of the religious strivings of the many nations. In their experience lies a witness which cannot be gainsaid. This relation between the history of languages and the history of religion is more than a simple parallel. Religion and language have points of close connexion. This connexion has sometimes been rated too highly and sometimes misinter- preted but it cannot be overlooked with impunity. Natural groups of religions and natural groups of languages are generally coincident. Nor is it strange that it should be so. The same intellec- tual peculiarities which fix the formation of a language, will fix also the formation of the re- 102 Relations of languages [CHAP. ligious belief, so far as it is an object of thought. The prevalent mode of viewing the world will make itself felt both in language and in religion. It is, for example, to take the simplest of all instances, a point of vast moment in the construc- tion of a popular religious faith whether in the language of the people persons and things are alike distinguished by sex-termination, or are separated from the first into distinct classes. In the one case there is the possibility of the per- sonification of natural powers from which flow almost necessarily the rich imaginations of my- thology. In the other case the possibility is excluded. The effect of the absence or presence of this capacity and tendency to personify external objects is seen both in the general form of religious belief, and specially in the names given to the unseen powers. Two great types of the worship of the African races are determined by this difference. The worship of the Kafirs, Negroes and Poly- nesians, who have no distinction of sex in nouns, is a worship of ancestors, the personal beings whom they can realise through memory ; the worship of the Hottentots and North African races is based on the personification of the heavenly bodies sug- iv.] and religions. 103 gested by their sex-denoting languages 1 . So again in Chinese there are no genders and there is no indigenous mythology. Again, when men give names to the unseen forms by which they believe that they are sur- ronnded they may seek them either from what they observe in human action or from the phenomena of the outer world. The Shemitic and Aryan religions are distinguished by this fundamental difference of view. The Divine names which are proper to the Shemitic languages are predicative and moral, drawn from the relations of human society : the names which are proper to the Aryan languages are physical and concrete 2 . But here it is evident that the language does not mould the fashion of the thought but simply reveals it. The idea of the Divine power is realised in the one case under the image of a moral relation and in the other under a physical image. We can say no more than that both modes of representing the 1 Dr Bleek, Comparative Grammar of the South African Languages, Preface, quoted by Max Miiller, Introduction to the Science of Religion, pp. 40 f. ; and compare for the whole sub- ject Max Miiller's Essay hi his ' Chips, 1 ii. pp. 1 146. 2 The Chinese represent both conceptions. Of the two names which they apply to the highest spiritual powers the one expresses the thought of physical vastness with an un- alterable simplicity and (it may be said) incompleteness (Tien), and the other that of supreme sovereignty (TI, Shang Ti.) Connexion of forms of language [CHAP. ultimate fact are essentially human, and necessary for its complete expression. An absolute religion will in some way recognise both. If we go a step further in the development of language, and proceed from the mere giving of names to the formation of words we shall find that the structural differences of languages which answer to specialities of national character exert a direct influence upon the growth of religious beliefs. Our example shall be taken again from a comparison of the Shemitic and Aryan languages. In the Shemitic languages the root, the funda- mental element of the word, stands out with ineffaceable distinctness : in the Aryan languages the root is often covered up in formative elements. This great law extends even to a secondary stage. In Hebrew, for example, with one or two doubt- ful exceptions, there are absolutely no compound words : in Greek and German, to take the most familiar examples, the power and richness of the language depends in a great measure upon the limitless variety of compounds. In the former case therefore the original meaning of the root so to speak shines through the dress in which it is clothed, and the resultant word always points back to its source. In the latter case, the derivatives often become names which have lost their signi- iv.] with types of religious belief. 105 ficance, and which call up none of their first associations. In the Shemitic dialects the terms for the heaven or the dawn could not put off their direct physical meaning. The personal interpre- tation of the phenomena of nature was thus impossible. With the Aryan languages it was otherwise. The meaning of Eos or Hecate, of Jupiter or Mars was forgotten ; and the manifes- tations of one unknown Power were made separate personalities. The general conclusion from these facts has been well summed up in a single sentence : " The language of the Shemitic races was theological : the language of the Aryan races was mythological " (Max Miiller). This difference carried with it far-reaching consequences. In the one case there was, if not the tendency, at least the power to concentrate the different ideas of majesty and lordship on One Sovereign : in the other case there was the tendency to define and isolate the separate repre- sentations of forces regarded in their outward manifestations. But while we recognise the part which lan- guage has played and still plays in giving form to popular religious notions, we must be careful not to exaggerate this influence. The language does not itself create or finally explain the religion. 106 Languages reveal and do not [CHAP. It simply illustrates the impulses and tendencies which found expression in the religion under the intellectual form ; but the impulses and tendencies themselves underlie religion and language alike. We have not reached the end when we can see that particular languages offered facilities for the formation and propagation of special religious ideas. The original question still remains : How came the languages to have these peculiar de- velopments ? And the answer remains hidden in the ultimate mystery of life. Language reveals the deepest springs of thought, and of religious thought as of all other thought, but it does not create them. Each particular language reveals, or has the tendency to reveal, just so much of the Truth as the race is endowed with as a constituent of humanity. Man is born to worship j ust as he is born to speak : he is born religious just as he is born social. In the ordering of outward life he finds expression for the one part of his nature : in the embodiment of faith he finds expression for the other. The consciousness of the three funda- mental existences self, the world, GOD carries with it necessarily the desire to reconcile them. That this is so is an ultimate fact of experience. To go back then to the point from which we digressed, we are justified in looking to history IV.] create religious tendencies. 107 for a manifestation of man's nature, originally religious, shewn in many fragments and under many disguises. A belief in GOD constrains us to hold that the office of working out different parts of the total inheritance of mankind was committed in the order of Providence to different races. And in every part, in every fragmentary realisation of man's endowments and powers, re- ligion has a share. Religion is necessary for the full expression of human life. In the course of time, under isolating influences, systems of philo- sophy or morals or art may usurp the place of religion, but even so they render a silent homage to its sovereignty. They shew something of the depths of the soul over which religion broods ; and stir thoughts, efforts, feelings, which they cannot satisfy. They treat, if only partially, of mysteries of GOD, the world, and self, which lie in the innermost consciousness of men. Their divi- sion is a witness to the developed vastness of the thoughts which they cannot keep together. But at first men strive after a religious interpretation of phenomena dimly seen. Little by little the re- ligious idea takes shape, often falsely and always imperfectly. The embodiment grows and decays with the society to which it corresponds ; but each stage of growth and decay of growth, may we say, through decay is full of abiding interest. 108 In what sense there is [CHAP. We know through the facts of our own individual experience something of the process of change. Our personal experience of the formation of our own religious conceptions helps us to understand the progress in natural sequence from the childly to the maturer faith, from the undefined belief in GOD, which is part of man's original equipment, to the belief in many gods of partial and different powers and then to the belief in One GOD. We have ourselves known corresponding stages in the realisation of our own Faith. And this progress, achieved at least in thought on a large scale by the noblest among Gentile teachers, is part of the 'testimony of the soul naturally Christian': the revelation of the soul's wants which the absolute religion must meet. This is one side of the great lessons of the Gentile religions ; and on the other hand the popular corruptions of simple religions are no less instructive. In a different sense these also are witnessings of the soul to Christ, so far as they shew that man cannot live in the thin atmosphere of abstractions, but must make for himself objects to which he can approach and which, in a sense which he can realise, may go before him. There is then we believe, to gather up what njU has been said, a certain original correspondence between national religions and national charac- iv.] a science of religion. 109 teristics. As each nation contributes something to the fulness of the life of humanity, and some- thing also to our knowledge of man's powers; even so it is with the manifestation of their religious beliefs and aspirations. In the earliest stage of society perhaps the religion is the interpreter no less than the bond of the nation. And even after- wards, in the later stages of natural progress or degeneration, there are further lessons to be learnt. There is also a law which connects the successive phases of each popular religion in its process of development or disintegration. In a certain sense therefore we may speak of a his- torical science of religion as we speak of a historical science of language. But the parallel must not be pressed too far. Man contains within himself all the springs from which speech flows. Nothing is added which is not the consequence of what precedes. The development of language will consequently be continuous and everywhere like in kind, if not like in form or in degree. But in the case of religion it is not so. Our knowledge of GOD depends, as we have seen, upon the revelation which He is pleased to make of Himself. And the natural voice of humanity proclaims with no uncertain sound that He has in fact made Himself known in various ways and at various times. There is, no doubt, a close 110 Two groups of facts [CHAP. relation between all alleged revelations and the state of things in which they were brought for- ward. In the case of fictitious revelations it is possible to find an explanation of their origin and acceptance in the circumstances under which they were received. In the revelations of which the Bible is the record we maintain that such an explanation is impossible. In this case there is indeed a divine fitness which connects every revelation of GOD with the circumstances under which it is given; but the circumstances do not produce, nor have they even a tendency to produce, the revelation of which they are the condition. The medium does not create the life. It follows therefore that in the historical study of religion we shall have two groups of facts to coordinate and interpret, those which present the evolution of the religious idea of man from within according to the working of his own proper powers; and those which represent the ap- propriation of super-added truths communicated directly by GOD, not to all at once, but to a representative people and to representative men. We have to observe the history of religious ideas in ' the nations ' and in ' the people.' The two streams perpetually intermix. The human often opens the way for the divine, and provides the iv.] to be recognised. Ill channel in which "it can best flow : the divine adds to the human that towards which it tended and which it could not supply. A single illustration will bring out clearly the distinction which I desire to draw. There was, as has been already noticed, a preparedness, so to speak, for the reception of the doctrine of the unity of GOD among the Shemitic races. The structure of their language and the tendency of thought which it represented, qualified them both to apprehend and to retain the truth. No- where else in the world can we find the same ruling idea of symmetry, the same simplicity, the same stationariness. Thus there was, it is true, a divine congruity in the fact that Abraham a Shemite became the Father of the faithful ; but as he stands out among idolatrous polytheists of the same race we feel also that the possession of the truth whereby he was a source of blessing to all nations came from a Divine gift and not from a natural 'instinct 'shared by him with his fellow- Shemites. The call of Abraham and his obedience of faith is a fresh beginning in the religious life of mankind, a true new creation. The later history of the East is a signal commentary on this central revelation to the world. The ' One GOD ' of Judaism, of Christianity, and of Mohammedan- ism is proclaimed to be 'the GOD of Abraham.' 112 The work of Persia. [CHAP. There is, as has been often pointed out, no historic monotheism which does not start from this definite covenant which GOD made with him who still after nearly four thousand years is called in the land of his pilgrimage, the land of faith, 'the friend of God.' But even when we have thus distinguished two streams of religious ideas, and claimed for special revelation, symbolised in the call of Abra- ham, its proper place in the religious history of the world, the part fulfilled by heathendom in the training of humanity for Christ the broken imperfect representation of the normal discipline and development (so to speak) of the religious power in man as he was created does not lose its importance. Two arguments will be sufficient to establish the point. The first is derived from the office which the two great types of the religious thought of the Aryan race actually discharged in the development of Judaism : the second lies in the direct words of the inspired writers. No student of the history of Judaism can fail to recognise the lasting effects which Cyrus and Alexander the representatives of the Eastern and Western Aryan civilizations wrought upon the Jewish Church. The services which Persia iv.] The work of Greece. 113 rendered to the education of the world have descended to us through the influences of the later organisation of the people of Israel. The work of Greece, on the other hand, lives for the simplest Christian in the New Testament. It' can hardly be presumptuous to say that without the discipline of the Persian supremacy and the quickening impulse of Greek thought, a medium could not have been prepared to receive and record the revelation of the Gospel. The chosen people gathered to itself in due time the treasures which other races had won. Not to pursue this subject in detail, it will be enough for the student to compare the Jewish people before and after the Captivity to under- stand what they owed to Persian influence. Idolatry, which had been their besetting sin in earlier ages, disappeared. At the same time fuller views of the unseen world were opened before them. The kingdom became a church : an ec- clesiastical system was consolidated : teachers stood by the side of priests : prayer assumed a new importance in worship : the bond of the society was felt more and more to be spiritual and not only local. The conquests of Alexander and the consequent increase and wider extension of the Jews of ' the Dispersion' served to deepen this feeling of the W. G. L. 8 114 The work of the Nations. [CHAP. potential universality of the Jewish revelation in its final completeness. Alexandria was added as a third centre of the faith to Jerusalem and Babylon. Greek thoughts were brought under the light of the concentrated belief in the unity of GOD and in His Personal sovereignty over creation. The Greek language was slowly adapted to the more exact and complete expression of the conceptions which Hebrew could only convey in a colossal outline. Let any one, to say all at once, compare the Greek Testament with the LXX. and with the Hebrew original, and he will be able to estimate the value of those instruments of precise analysis and exposition which the unconscious labours of the whole Greek race prepared for Christians from the first. There are distinct, if scanty, acknowledgments of this world- wide fulfilment of the one counsel of GOD even in the Old Testament. In the pa- triarchal age Melchizedek is the symbol of the truth. And in two most remarkable passages of the book of Deuteronomy even alien and false worships are presented as part of the divine ordering of humanity. The Lord the GOD of Israel had 'divided all the host of heaven unto all the peoples under the whole heaven' (iv. 19). He had 'given them' to the nations but not to iv.] recognised in the Bible. 115 His own people (xxix. 20). Even these idolatries had a work to do for Him, an office in the disciplining of men, however little we .may be able to understand the scope of its fulfilment. The description which Isaiah gives of the work of Cyrus 'the Lord's Shepherd' (xliv. 28), 'the Lord's Anointed' (xlv. 1), is more familiar. In the New Testament the conception of a growth of humanity underlies in one sense the whole picture of the age. The Gospel came at ' the fulness of time ' (Gal. iv. 4 ; comp. Eph. i. 10 ; Tit. i. 3 ; Rom. v. 6), which answered alike to the set period of the will of the Father, and to the preparation of the many ' sons.' Such a view of the absolute correspondence between the one divine fact and the circumstances under which it was wrought follows directly from the doctrine of the age-long revelation of the Word, who was in the world and (in another sense) was ever coming into the world which He had made (John i. 9 ff.). And the few notices which occur in the apostolic writings of the position of the heathen towards the Christian revelation take account equally of what they had been able to do and of what they had failed to do (Acts xiv. 1 7 ; xvii. 24 ff. ; Rom. i. 19 ff.). The words of the Lord are heard from the beginning to the end Other sheep I have which are not of this fold (John x. 16) sheep who were 89 116 Justin Martyr on the divine [CHAP. not the less sheep because they had not yet re- cognised their shepherd. The truth which was thus realised in the history of the Jews and recognised in the teach- ing of the New Testament found a partial exposi- tion among some of the early Greek Fathers, of whom Justin Martyr and Clement of Alexandria are the best examples. These fathers and others, particularly men of the Alexandrine School, though they did not rise to the apprehension of the special office of Gentile nations in the divine economy, which a larger view of the relations of the parts of our vast human life enables us to gain, yet saw clearly that there was a work for and of GOD going on during the apparent isolation of the heathen from the region in which the Spirit revealed Him. The teaching of Justin is sin- gularly full of interest, and in some respects unique. The truths in the utterances of heathen philosophy and poetry are due, he says, to the fact that 'a seed of the Word is implanted' (or rather 'inborn/ epfyvrov) 'in every race of men.' Those who grasped the truth lived ' according to a part of the seminal Word' even as Christians live 'according to the knowledge and contem- plation of the whole Word, that is Christ.' They 'nobly uttered what they saw akin to the part iv.] element in Gentile teachers. 117 'of the divine seminal Word which they had ' received.' The opponents of Christianity pleaded that it was of recent date, and that men who lived before its promulgation were irresponsible. Justin replies: 'he has been taught... that Christ is the ' first born (TTPWTOTOKOV rov @eoO) of GOD, as being ' the Logos (Word, Reason), in which all the race ' of men partook. And those who lived with the ' Word (with Reason) are Christians even if they ' were accounted atheists, as, among Greeks, Socrates ' and Heraclitus and those like them, and among ' non-Greeks Abraham, and Ananias, Azarias and 'Misael, and Elias, and many others....' But while Justin acknowledges in this way that there were, in one sense, Christians before Christ among the heathen and an actual working of the Word through the reason of man, he in- clines to the popular but untenable belief, which had been long current at Alexandria, that the Gentile teaching on ' the immortality of the soul, 'and punishments after death and the like' were borrowed from the Jewish prophets 1 . Clement is equally undecided in his view of the origin of the truths of heathendom. On the whole he regards them as partly borrowed from 1 Just. M. Apol. ii. 8 (p. 188 Otto) ; ii. 13 (p. 200) ; Apol. i. 46 (p. 110); i. 44 (p. 106). Comp. Apol. i. 5; ii. 10. 118 Clement of Alexandria on [CHAP. Jewish revelation and partly derived from reason illuminated by the Word the final source of reason. There was, he says, in philosophy a little fire, stolen as it were by a Prometheus, fit to give light, if duly fanned : faint traces of wisdom and an impulse from GOD. And so Greek philosophers were in this sense thieves and robbers, who before the Lord's coming took from the Hebrew prophets fragments of truth. They did not possess the deeper knowledge of its import (ov /car' entry vwo-iv) but appropriated what they took as their own doc- trines. Some truths they disfigured : others they overlaid with restless and foolish speculations: others they discovered, for perhaps they also had he concludes ' a spirit of wisdom.' Yet whatever might be the connexion between Jewish and Gentile doctrines, both systems were related to the Gospel as parts to the whole, and parts mutilated by the perverseness of men. The various schools of philosophy, Jewish and heathen alike, are described by Clement under a memor- able image as rending in pieces the one Truth, as the Bacchanals rent the body of Pentheus and bore about the fragments in triumph. Each one, he says, boasts that the morsel which has fallen to it is all the Truth... Yet by the rising of the Light all things are brightened. . .and he continues, ' he that again combines the divided parts and iv.] Greek Philosophy. 119 ' unites the Word, the revelation, of GOD (\6yo