^liiliiMpfHiliiiW iiiifiilliiilWiiilii^ 0>^' -/ / '7 AX^ A The Works of Leonard Merrick THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN AND OTHER STORIES The Works of LEONARD MERRICK CONRAD IN QUEST OF HIS YOUTH. With an Introduction by Sib J. M. Bakbis. WHEN LOVE FLIES OUT O' THE WINDOW. With an Introduction by Sib William Robebtv BON NiCOLL. THE QUAINT COMPANIONS. With an Intro- duction by H. G. Wells. THE POSITION OF PEGGY HARPER. With an Introduction by Sib Abthub Pineeo. THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN and other Stories. With an Introduction by W. J. Locke. THE WORLDLINGS. With an Introduction by Neil Muneo. THE ACTOR-MANAGER. With an Introduction by W. D. HowELLS. CYNTHIA. With an Introduction by Maubicb Hewlett. ONE MAN'S VIEW. With an Introduction by Gbanvillb Baekee. THE MAN WHO WAS GOOD. With an Intro- duction by J. K. Peothbbo. A CHAIR ON THE BOULEVARD. With an Introduction by A. Neil Lyons. THE HOUSE OF LYNCH. With an Introduc- tion by G. K. Chestebton. WHILE PARIS LAUGHED: Being Pbanks and Passions of the Poet Tbicotbin. NEW YORK E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN AND OTHER STORIES ¥ By LEONARD MERRICK ¥ WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY W. J. LOCKE NEW YORK E P. DUTTON AND COMPANY 681 FIFTH AVENUE COPTEIGHT, 1911, BY MITCHELL KENNERLET COPTHIGHT, 1919, BY E. P. BUTTON & COMPANY All Rights Reserved The First American Definitive Edition, with Introduction by W. J. Locke, limited to 1550 copies (of which only 1500 were for sale) Published September, 1919 Second American Edition, October, 1919 Third " " October, 1919 Printed in the United States of America PR CONTENTS I PA OB THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN 1 II A VERY GOOD THING FOR THE GIRL 18 III THE WOMAN WHO WISHED TO DIE 35 IV FRANKENSTEIN II 50 V THE TALE THAT WOULDN't DO 68 VI THE LAURELS AND THE LADY 81 VII THE CHILD IN THE GARDEN 160 VIII A LETTER TO THE DUCHESS ^ . 180 IX THE PRINCE IN THE FAIRY TALE 200 X WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD 224 V \i CONTEXTS DEAD VIOLETS ^9 xn THE FATOnUTE PLOT 259 xm TIME, THE HUMORIST 277 THE BACK OF BOHEMIA 293 XV THE LADT OF LTOXs' 313 XVI THE THTRD M 326 xvn THE bishop's COMEDY 344 XVIII A REVERIE 364 XTX THE RECONCILIATION 368 XX THE CALL FROM THE PAST ........ 383 INTRODUCTION^ One of our most delightful novelists has re- cently written a preface to a collection of his short stories in which he apologises for disinter- ring them from magazines and resuscitating them in book form. I think he ought not to have done it. If a preface were needed, it should have been written rather as an appeal, than as a warning. It should have been in the nature of a bugle- blast. It should have said, in effect : "Here, my faithful and gentle readers who, owing to the limitations of time and space and the worries of the world, have missed much of my best and most cherished work — here is an opportunity of an unexpected feast." I confess that such an ap- peal would not have been modest — and the au- thor in question is the most modest of our con- fraternity — but the assertion would have been true. Xow, with the agreeable task before me of writing a preface to another man's collection, I am not bound by any such sense of modesty, and I should like to make clear once more certain issues which my friend above referred to has, to a certain extent, confused. ivii rsTsoDucnox In -he ±r5t place, it must be understood that the noTci and the short stonr are two oitirelv difT^ :: artistic €3^resaoiis. as different as the grr_: _-T lilting and the miniatare. And as rarely as th r :..: mpHshed landscape-painter and Tj r :. ; ; : : . : Tii^tnrist are incarnate in one _ . .7 _zir : /ddnal so raieh- sffe the ac- ::^tL;L ri n TrL,: :. 1 : e acoGOipli^^ed slicri story -writer thus L. ;i::-_:e. The nost fervait 1- __reTs of 31r. H _ ^7 : 1 HipTmg, among whom T :^^ T : _ 5 to crmr. :_iyself , wiH not flf^im far —^ z r.f -.1 : izj- : ; >r?=ii:g' -he incalcnlahle and inirdi:: -t Ttt- r.:. ::_:_, :_e magical genius oi tzLzzt-z.z. ~L : - T : :r i in all his work — evQi in 7" r .: - '-.1 Leggar^ the per- fecrti^n of si--t„ t .: ::^_ i_r flawless technique of P:<2f 1 T^Tf ^ r ' -^'" "^L-fe'g Handicap. In the sizie t^t^t Tre ttv^^ : : i_;^ re Guy de M: t"s grt itnrss by L'r^ Vic or 3/wrf O" 1 ^Li^L :he late Henry Harl^nd is "' ^ : ^r_ ^^Ti by that study in sunshiiie, Tiie Car- ~ - r^ his : : - i :~ers turn to the in- 11-.:/ '.' ' -'z'.z-. :. G'-ey B'jxei 211^ Come- C inTers-eiT. :_ir of the greatest novelists have but litrlr Tiiue as storr writers. The so- ::.' ' :: :: Diikeiis — T'^e Crichet on z\c Hi-- Z' : C i. A Cfiri^mag Carol — IXTRODUCTION ix are between thirty and forty thousand words in length. Among Thackeray's many sketches may be found a few which we understand as short sto- ries, but theT do not rank with Hev.ru E»mond and TJie Xezccomeg. The essential novelist accustomed to his broad canvas, to the multiplicity of human destinies with which he is concerned and their inter-rela- ticHi, to his varied backgrounds, to the free space which his art allows him both for minute analysis of character and for his own philosophical re- flections on life, is apt to find himself absurdly cramped wi thin the narrow confines of the short story. His short stories have a way of becoming ccmdensed novels. Thev contain more stuff than they ought to hold, at a sacrifice of balance, di- rectness and clearness of exposition, Xow, with- out dogmatising in the conventional fashion, or indeed in any fashion, over what a short story ought or ought not to be, or asserting definite laws of technique, I think it is obvious that if a story told in ten thousand words would have been a better, clearer, more fuHy developed story told in a hundred thousand, it is not a perfectly told story. For. though there is a modem tendency to revolt against an older school of criticism which set technique over subject, and to scoff at form, yet we cannot get away from the fact that X INTRODUCTION the told story, whether long or short, is a work of art, and is subject to the eternal canons where- by every art is governed. No matter what a man has to say, if he does not strive to express it per- fectly, he is offending. The "condensed novel," being imperfect, is an offence. On the other hand, the essential short story writer engaged upon a novel, is apt to be dis- mayed by the vastness of the canvas he has to cover. His habit of mind — minute, delicate and swift — wars against a conception of the archi- tectonics of a novel. In consequence, his novel may appear thin, episodical and laboured, with scenes spun out beyond their value, thus missing their dramatic effect and spoiling the balance of the work. If, therefore, a story of a hundred thousand words could have been told more effec- tively in ten thousand, it is, like the "condensed novel," not a perfectly told story. Briefly, the tendency of the essential novelist in writing a short story is to make literary con- densed milk, while that of the essential short story wi'iter working in the medium of a novel is to make milk and water. Occasionally, of course, among the great writ- ers of fiction we meet with the combination of the two faculties. Ealzac the short story writer is as great as Balzac the novelist. The Contes Dro- INTRODUCTION xi latiques alone would have brought him fame. Stevenson was master of both crafts. Who shall say whether The Sire de MaUtroifs Door or The Ebb Tide is the more perfect work of art? Now among contemporary writers, Mr. Leon- ard ]\Ierrick is eminently one who, like Balzac and Stevenson, is gifted with the double faculty. His reputation as a novelist rests on a sure foun- dation, and his novels in this edition of his works will be dealt with by other hands. But, owing to the fact of the novel being in the commercial world "more important" than the short story, his claim to the distinct reputation of a short story writer has more or less been overlooked. Again, it is popularly supposed that a writer of fiction regards the short story as either a relaxation from more arduous toil or as a means of adding & few extra pounds to his income. In his acqui- escence in this disastrous superstition lies my quarrel with my distinguished preface-writing friend. Now, although I do not say that we are all such high-minded folk that none of us has ever stooped to "i^ot-boiling," yet I assert that every conscientious artist approaches a short story with the same earnestness as he does a nov- el. Further, that in proportion to its length he devotes to it more concentration, more loving and scrupulous care. There are days during the xii INTRODUCTION writing of a novel when that combination of fierce desire to work and sense of power which one loosely talks about as "inspiration," is at ebb, and others when it is at flow. Homer nods some- times. No man can bestow equal essence of him- self on every page of a long novel. But a short story is generally written at full-tide. By its na- ture it can be finished before the impulse is over. There is time to weigh every word of it, attend to the rhythm of every sentence, adjust the del- icate balance of the various parts, and there is the thrilling consciousness of unity. Instead of the climax being months off, there it is at hand to be reached in a few glad hours. So, far from being an unconsidered trifle, the short story is a work of intense consideration, and as far as our poor words can matter, of profound importance. It may be said that anything in the nature of a plea for the short story as a work of art is hope- lessly belated — I am quite aware that the wise and gifted made it long ago, and I remember the preaching of the apostles of the early 'nine- ties — but its repetition is none the less useful. Every item in the welter of short stories with which the innumerable magazines both here and in America flood the reading public is not a mas- terpiece. Every item is not perfect work. Many are exceedingly bad — bad in conception, style INTRODUCTION xiii and form. There is always the danger of the good being hidden, of bad and good being con- fused together in the public mind, and of the term "magazine story" becoming one of con- temptuous and unthinking reproach, as was the term "yellow-back" a generation ago. Accord- ingly it is well that now and again a word should be said in deprecation of an attitude which a tired and fiction-worn world is liable to adopt; and it is well to remind it that in the aforesaid welter there are many beautiful works of art, and to beseech it to exercise discrimination. The writer of an introduction to the work of a literary comrade labours under certain difficul- ties. He ought not to usurp the functions of the critic into whose hands the volume, when pub- lished, will come, and he is anxious, for the sake of prudence, not to use the language of hyper- bole, though he has it in his heart to do so. But, at least, I can claim for these short stories of Mr. Leonard IMerrick, that each, by its perfection of form and the sincerity of its making, takes rank as a work of art. In none is there a word too little or a word too much. Everywhere one sees evidence of the pain through which the soul of the artist has passed on its way to the joy of cre- ation. Everywhere is seen the firmness of out- line which only comes by conviction of truth, and xiv INTRODUCTION the light and shade which is only attained by a man who loves his craft. The field covered by Mr. Merrick in this col- lection is one which he has made peculiarly his own. Mainly it is the world of the artist, the poet, the journalist, in the years when hopes are high and funds are low, when the soul is full and the stomach empty. It is neither the Bohemia of yesterday's romance nor the Bohemia of drunken degradation, but the sober, clean-living, struggling Bohemia of to-day. It is a sedate, hard-up world of omnibuses, lodgings, second- rate tea shops and restaurants. Yet he does not belong to the static school who set do^\Ti the mere greyness of their conditions. He is a poet, mak- ing— "The violet of a legend blow Among the chops and steaks," as in The Lady of Lyons\ To Rosie McLeod, living "up ninety-eight stairs of a dingy house in a dilapidated court" in Montparnasse, comes the prince in the Fairy Tale. There is true poetry in The Laurels and the Lady with its amazing end. And yet his method is simple, direct, romantic. He writes of things as they really are, but his vision pierces to their significance. He can be relentless in his presentation of a poig- nant situation, as in A Very Good Thing for the INTRODUCTION xv Girl, a realist of the realists if you like ; but here, as everywhere in his work, are profound pity, tenderness and sympathetic knowledge of the hu- man heart. He writes not only of things seen, but of things felt. Whatever qualities his work may have, it has the great quahty essential to aU artistic endeavour — sincerity. WiLLiAi^i J. Locke. THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN AND OTHER STORIES THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN "Our bitterest remorse is not for our sins, but for our stupidities." — Excerpt from Wendover's new novel. Nothing had delighted Wendover so much when his first book appeared as some reviewer's reference to "the author's knowledge of women." He was then six or seven and twenty, and the compliment uplifted him the more because he had long regretted violently that he knew even less of women than do most young men. The thought of women fascinated him. He yearned to capti- vate them, to pass lightly from one love-affair to another, to have the right to call himself "blase." Alas! a few dances in the small provin- cial town that he had left when he was eighteen comprised nearly all his sentimental experiences; during his years of struggle in London he had been so abominably hard up that lodging-house keepers and barmaids were almost the only wom- en he addressed, and as his beverage was "a glass of bitter," the barmaids had been strictly com- mercial. To be told that he understood women enrap- 1 2 THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN tured him. "Instinct!" he said to himself. "Xow and then a man is born who knows the feminine mind intuitively." And in his next book there was an abundance of his fanciful psychology. Denied companionship with women, he revelled in writing about them, and drew from the pages in which he posed as their delineator something of the exultation that he would have derived from being their lover. There were even pages after which he felt sated with conquest. At these times nothing accorded with his mood so well as to pa- rade the Park and pretend to himself that the sight of the most attractive of the women bored him. But as loneliness really cried within him pa- thetically, he had an adventure, culminating in marriage, with a shop assistant who glanced at him one evening in Oxford Street. After mar'^ riage they found as little of an agreeable nature to say to each other as might have been expected, so a couple of j^ears later they separated, and the ex-shop hand went to reside with a widowed sis- ter, who "made up ladies' own materials" at Crouch End. Gradually he came to be accepted at his own valuation, to be pronounced one of the few gifted men from whom the feminine soul held no se- crets. Then when he was close on forty, a novel THE IVIAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN 3 that he produced hit the popular taste, and he began to make a very respectable income. Now, for the first time, he had opportunities for meeting the class of women that he had been writing about, and he found, to his consternation, that they failed to recognise him as an affinity after all. They were very amiable, but, like the farmer with the claret, he "never got any forrad- er." He perceived that his profundities were thought tedious, and that his attentions were thought raw. It was a sickening admission for an authority on women to have to make, but when he tried to flirt he felt shy. At last he decided that all the women whom he knew were too frivolous to appeal to a man of intellect, and that theii' company wearied him unutterablv. But, though he had reached middle-age, he had never as yet been really in love. In the autumn of his forty-second year — few people judged him to be so much — he removed to Paris. Some months afterwards, in the inter- ests of a novel that he had begun, he deserted his hotel in the rue d'Antin for a pension de famille on the left bank. This establishment, which was supported chiefly by English and American girls studying art, supplied the "colour" that he need- 4 THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN ed for his earlier chapters; and it was here that he made the acquaintance of Miss Searle. Miss Searle was about six-and-twenty, bohe- mian and ambitious beyond her talents. Such pensions de famille abound in girls who are more or less bohemian, and ambitious beyond their tal- ents, but Rhoda Searle was noteworthy — her face stirred the imagination, she had realised that she would never paint, and the free-and-easy in- tercourse of the Latin quarter had wholly un- fitted her for the prim provincialism to which she must return in England. "My father was a parson," she told Wendover once, as they smoked cigarettes together after dinner. "I had hard work to convince him that English art schools weren't the apex, but he gave in at last and let me come here. It was Para- dise! My home was in Beckenhampton. Do you know it? It's one of the dreariest holes in the kingdom. I used to go over to stay with him twice a year. I was very fond of my father, but I can't tell you how terrible those visits became to me, how I had to suppress myself, and how the drab women and stupid young men used to stare at me — as if I were a strange animal, or something improper; in places like Beckenhamp- ton they say 'Paris' in the same kind of voice that they say 'Hell.' I suppose I'm a bohemian by THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN 5 instinct, for even now that I know I should never make an artist, my horror isn't so much the loss of my hopes as the loss of my freedom, my — my identity; I am never to be natural any more. After I leave here I am to go on suppressing myself till the day I die! Sometimes I shall be able to shut myself up and howl — that's all I've got to look forward to." "What are you going to do?" asked Wendo- ver, looking sympathetic, and thinking pleasur- ably that he had found a good character to put into his book. "I am going back," she said, "a shining ex- ample of the folly of being discontented with district -visiting and Church bazaars! I go back a failure for Beckenhampton to moralise over. My old schoolmistress has asked me to stay with her while I 'look round' — you see, I've spent all my money, and I must find a situation. If the Beckenhampton parents don't regard me as too immoral, it is just possible she may employ me in the school to 'teach drawing' — unless I try to teach it. Then I suppose I shall be called a 'rev- olutionary' and be dismissed." She contemplated the shabby little salon thoughtfully, and lit another cigarette. "From the Boul' Mich' to a boarding school! It'll be a change. I wonder 6 THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN if it will be safe to smoke there if I keep my bed- room window open wide?" Yes, it would be as great a change as was con- ceivable, and Khoda Searle was the most inter- esting figure in the house to Wendover. She was going to England in a month's time — there was no reason why she should not go at once, save that she had enough money to postpone the evil day — and during this valedictory month, she and he talked of their "friendship." In the tortuous streets off the boulevard, she introduced him to humble restaurants, where the dinners were sometimes amazingly good at ridiculously low prices. Together they made little excursions, and pretended to scribble or sketch in the woods — looking at each other, however, most of the time ; and then at evening there was an inn to be sought, and the moon would rise sooner than the "friends"; and in the moonlight, when they re- turned to Paris and the pension de famille, senti- ment would constrain their tones. It was all quite innocent, but to the last degree unwise. The ex-shop assistant still throve decor- ously at Crouch End on his allowance, and Wen- dover should have seen that he was acting unfair- ly towards Miss Searle. To do him justice, he didn't see it — he had confided the story of his marriage to her, and it did not enter into his THE ^lAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN T thoughts that she might care for him seriously notwithstanding; his experiences had given him no cause to esteem himself dangerous, and the lover who has never received favours is, in prac- tice, always modest, though in aspirations he may be Juanesque. The suitor of quick perceptions has been made by other women, as everybody but the least sophisticated of debutantes knows. But if he did not dream that he might trouble the peace of JNIiss Searle, he was perpetually con- scious that ]Miss Searle had disturbed his own. A month's daily companionhsip with a tempera- ment, plus a fascinating face, would be danger- ous to any man — to Wendover it was fatal. His thoughts turned no longer to liaisons with duch- esses; his work, itself, was secondary to Rhoda Searle. Silly fellow as he appears, the emotions wakened in him were no less genuine than if he had combined all the noble qualities with which he invested the heroes of his books. Besides, most people would appear silly in a description which dealt only with their weaknesses. Wendo- ver loved, and he cursed the tie that prevented his asking the girl to be his wife. How happy he might have been ! He had feared that the last evening would be a melancholy one. But it was gay — the greater part of it was gay, at any rate. As soon as the 8 THE MAN WHO UNDERSTOOD WOMEN door slammed behind them he saw that she had resolved to keep the thought of the morrow's journey in the background, to help him to turn the farewell into a fete. Her laughing caution was unnecessary; her voice, her eyes had given him the cue — her journey was to be undertaken in the distant future, life was dehcious, and they were out to enjoy themselves! He had proposed dining at Armenonville — it wasn't the Paris that she had knovtn, but champagne and fashion seemed the right thing to-night; and no fiacre had ever before sped so blithely, never had the Bois been so enchanting, and never had another girl been such joyous company. After dinner, the Ambassadeurs ! The programme? They didn't listen to much of it, they were chattering