ESSAYS BY LEIGH HUNT. Uniform with the Present Volume. Handsomely printed and half-bound, price zs. each. THE ESSAYS OF ELIA. By Charles Lamb. Both Series complete in One Volume. GASTRONOMY AS A FINE ART. By Brillat-Savarik. Translated by R. E. Anderson, M.A. ANECDOTES OF THE CLERGY. By Jacob Larwood. THE EPICUREAN; and ALCIPHRON. By Thomas Moore. ROBINSON CRUSOE. By Daniel Defoe. Illustrated by George Cruikshank. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF SELBORNE. By Gilbert White, M.A. Edited by Thomas Brown, F.L.S. LONDON: CHATTO & WINDUS, PICCADILLY. ESSAYS BY LEIGH HUNT EDITED WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND NOTES By EDMUND OLLIER A NEW EDITION 3Lont«an CHATTO & WINDUS, PICCADILLY BAI.LANTYNE, HANSON AND CO. EDINBURGH AND LONDON UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BAKBARA CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION, . SOCIAL GENEALOGY, PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS CONNECTED WITH THE METRO POLIS, . . . . ON THE HOUSEHOLD GODS OF THE ANCIENTS, LUDICROUS EXAGGERATION, FATAL MISTAKE OF NERVOUS DISORDERS FOR INSANITY, MISTS AND FOGS, . FAR COUNTRIES, . A TALE FOR A CHIMNEY CORNER, THIEVES, ANCIENT AND MODERN. — FIRST PAPER, " " SECOND PAPER, " " THIRD PAPER, A FEW THOUGHTS ON SLEEP, THE FAIR REVENGE, GETTING UP ON COLD MORNINGS, HATS, NEW AND ANCIENT, lady's MAID. — SEAMEN ON SHORE, DEATHS OF LITTLE CHILDREN, . OF STICKS, A NOW, .... COACHES AND THEIR HORSES. — FIRST PAPER, " " SECOND PAPER OF THE SIGHT OF SHOPS. — FIRST PAPER. *' " SECOND PAPER, 38 46 52 57 62 69 75 85 95 107 120 126 133 139 147 157 162 171 177 188 199 209 VI CONTENTS. TO ANY ONE WHOM BAD WEATHER DEPRESSES, THE OLD GENTLEMAN, . , . , ON THE REALITIES OF IMAGINATION, . SHAKSPEARE's BIRTHDAY, A RAINY DAY, ..... O.M THE TALKING OF NONSENSE, ON THE SLOW RISE OF THE MOST RATIONAL OPINIONS SUPERFINE BREEDING, .... SHAKING HANDS, . . . . . ON RECEIVING A SPRIG OF LAUREL FROM VAUCLUSE, A HUMAN ANIMAL, AND THE OTHER EXTREME, UPON INDEXES, . . THOUGHTS AND GUESSES ON HUMAN NATURE, MAY-DAY, .... spring. — daisies.— gathering flowers, of dreams, .... on commendatory verses, hoole's and Fairfax's tasso, . PAGE 2X8 222 227 238 242 248 261 264 268 280 283 303 312 323 335 LEIGH HUNT.' IN studying the prose of Leigh Hunt, we make the ac- quaintance of what may be regarded as an intermediate territory between the older and the newer styles of essay-writing. His youthful productions had a smack of the eighteenth century, and yet were not of it ; his more mature works were distinguished in a great degree by the character- istics of to-day, and yet were in some measure different. His tirst ideas of literature were formed while the Johnsonian style was still dominant, before the French Revolution had had time to rouse the mind of Europe (or at least of England) out of its pseudo-scholastic lethargy, before the war with Buonaparte had come to confront the nation with the stem truths of a new state of things, and while yet the great in- ventions of our own day were unsuspected, except by a few thoughtful brains. It was the worst period that our literature has ever known. The great dictator of Fleet Street had gone, leaving behind him a host of feeble satellites, * Some small portions of this Introduction have alread.y appeared in other places. X LEIGH HUNT. who made the vices of his style apparent in their vapid and insincere imitations. Those who did not mimic Johnson did worse ; for they wrote in a tone of maudhn sentiment- ahty that had not even the show of strength. Burke and Gibbon, indeed, were still living; but they stood almost alone. In poetry, the Delia Cruscan manner prevailed, with its false simplicity and real tinsel, its lachrymose tenderness and sham romance. Wordsworth and Coleridge had not yet risen above the horizon, and, in the dearth of original genius, Hayley was looked upon as a prodigy. It is true that Cowper kept alive the feeling of a better day ; but even his poems were to some extent imbued with the faults of the time. It was in the midst of these influences that Leigh Hunt's earliest literary style was fashioned. The age was one of pretence, and the young poet and essayist suffered in the first instance from the mistakes of others. He had " a good old aunt," who used to encourage him "to write fine letters," and on whom he composed an elegy after her death, in which he called her " a nymph " ! In our days, none but a boy could commit such an absurdity; but at that time the boy simply followed the example of his elders, who in such affairs were probably not his superiors. The old lady her- self, who was so fond of "fine letters," would doubtless have considered her translation into the nymphal state a perfectly proper thing — in poetry. In the same arti- ficial and sophisticated strain, Leigh Hunt, when a boy, wrote " an Ode in praise of the Duke of York's victory at Dunkirk, which," he relates, " I was afterwards excessively mortified to find had been a defeat. I compared him to Alexander, or rather dismissed Alexander with contempt in the exordium." In a letter to one of his daughters, he says LEIGH HUNT. XI that he described the Duke as " galloping about through the field of battle, shooting the Frenchmen in the eye I " When he had shaken himself free of this rubbish, Leigh Hunt be- came one of the most natural writers that ever lived; but it was not until after some years that he corrected the false literary education of his youth. His experiences at the Blue-coat School were not of a character to set him in the right road. The master, Boyer, seems to have been a pedant, without any appreciation of the spirit of classical learning, which he apparently regarded as an affair of grammar and of mechanical forms. The boy saw through and disliked the formalism ; and he fled for refuge to the poets of his own country — but generally to the poorest and weakest of them. He forsook one kind of conventionality for another ; he bathed his mind in the poetry of the period immediately succeeding Pope, and ap- pears to have regarded the contributors to " Dodsley's Mis- cellany" as the greatest masters of verse. So true to him were the most sickly pretences of the so-called pastoral school of poetry, that he and some of his school-fellows would oc- casionally row up the river to Richmond, in order that they might enact, literally and in good faith, Collins's extravagant lines about Thomson's grave in his Ode on the death of that poet : — " Remembrance oft shall haunt the shore When Thames in summer wreaths is dress'd, And oft suspend the dashing oar, To bid his gentle spirit rest." Such was the style which he then believed in and rever- enced ; such was the style in which his earliest volume of poems, called " Juvenilia," was composed. It was towards XU LEIGH HUNT. the close of the year 1799 that he quitted the Blue-coat School, and "Juvenilia" appeared in 1802. Six years later than that — namely, in 1808 — the Exami7ier com- menced; but, in the meanwhile, the young author had been trying his wings in a variety of ways, though chiefly in the direction of essay-writing and theatrical criticism. The eighteenth century style was still in the ascendant, and some of the men whom we are accustomed to associate with that century almost exclusively were yet living and compos- ing. Sheridan had several years of life before him ; Arthur Murphy, the friend and biographer of Johnson, might have been among the readers of Leigh Hunt's early pro- ductions ; Mrs Piozzi, whose portrait had been painted by Hogarth, was alert and vigorous ; so was Hannah More ; Person was astounding Europe with his learning, and rejoic- ing his boon companions with his wit in the Cider Cellars of Maiden Lane ; and Burke, Gibbon, Cowper, and Horace Walpole were but newly dead. The prose writings of Leigh Hunt in those days were in a great degree modelled on a book which was then a favourite of his, and for which, in- deed, he retained a regard to the end of his existence — the Connoisseur of Colman the Elder and Bonnell Thornton. It was a collection of periodical essays in the manner ot Addison's and Steele's Tatlcr and Spectator, and was distin- guished by a vein of pleasant humour and wit, though wanting the freshness and originality of its prototypes. Its influence over Leigh Hunt was marked. The first set of essays he ever wrote in public — for there must have been many predecessors in private — were contributed to the Traveller evening newspaper (now united with the Globe), under the signature of " Mr Town, junior, Critic and Censor- LEIGH HUNT. XUl general ; " which, with the omission of the " junior," was the designation of the assumed author of the Connoisseur. He even caught up the pet phrases of the Connoissetir period ; talked of "the town," "the critics," " the wits," "the fops," &c. ; and reproduced, with half-unconscious fidelity, the tone of airy banter in which they delighted. We see the prevalence of this style in the volume (published in 1807) entitled, " Critical Essays on the Performers of the London Theatres, including General Observations on the Practice and Genius of the Stage. By the Author of the Theatrical Criticisms in the Weekly Paper called the News." The book is extremely clever — we have certainly no such dramatic criticism now, nor, indeed, any drama or school of acting to call it forth ; but the style is that of laboured and conscious epigram, combined with the somewhat ostentatious scholar- liness, and proneness to moralise and lecture, of a youth not long free from the influences of his tutor. The wit, however, is often genuine, notwithstanding the assumed manner ; as where, speaking of John Kemble's eccentricities of pronunciation, the essayist says, " I could mispronounce much better than he when I was a mere infant." This is like some of the happy sallies of Johnson in familiar conversa- tion ; but a few lines further down we have Johnson in his balanced literary style : — " He (Kemble) does not present one the idea of a man who grasps with the force of genius, but of one who overcomes by the toil of attention." Nothing could be more unlike this method of thinking and writing than the mature style of Leigh Hunt. Family antecedents have often much to do with deter- mining a man's character and genius ; and so it was in the present instance. Leigh Hunt's father was a Barbadian; JCIV LEIGH HUNT. his motlier a native of Pliiladelphia. Both families, Hunts and Shewells, were of EngUsh origin ; but they had been settled for a few generations in the New World, and had acquired some semi-tropical characteristics. Leigh Hunt himself had a decidedly West Indian look, and there were not wanting West Indian elements in his disposition. Although some writers have indulged in a species of cant about his "gentleness," and although it is true that his nature was full of affection and of placability — both increasing with the progress of years — he had a good deal of hot blood in him, and could show it upon occasion. His earlier writings prove this, beyond the necessity of further remark. He had something also of the volatility, the luxuriance of fancy, the quickness to pleasurable impressions, the occasional reactions of melancholy, and the want of practical knowledge and adaptability, commonly found among natives of those lands which border on the sun. His volatihty was in time counteracted by suffering, experience, and thought; his luxuriance of fancy was gradually curbed by the instincts of an exquisite literary taste, educated by incessant reading ; his quick apprehen- sion of the pleasurable was kept in check by a conscientious and truly virtuous soul, and by habits of life which carried temperance to the length of abstemiousness; and the reactions of melancholy were overcome by a general tendency to cheerfulness. But the want of aptitude for the practical affairs of life continued to the end, and was the chief source of Leigh Hunt's continual embarrassments. He was also insensibly influenced by his parents in other ways than those to which I have alluded. Isaac Hunt, the father, was a clergyman of the Church of England, living in LEIGH HUNT. XV Philadelphia at the time the war of independence broke out, and, being a staunch Royalist, he was obliged to fly to England. He did not get on well here, and died poor and broken-spirited. His wife (Leigh Hunt's mother) came of a Quaker stock ; but, in their later years, both forsook orthodoxy for Unitarianism, and were likewise Universalists — that is to say, believers in the ultimate goodness and happiness of all created beings, even including demons. These circumstances tended to the creation of certain habits of mind and disposition in the young genius. He was accustomed from his earliest years to a mingling of religious reverence with freedom of religious thought, and to a regard for the interests of humanity as superior to any personal advantage. The very loyalty of his parents, taking the form of revolt from a successful revolution, encouraged in him a spirit of political independence ; and the narrow means with which he was familiar during childhood and youth threw him upon his own resources, while perhaps rendering him a little too easy under conditions which he might have amended by a greater regard to the ordinary business of the world. But, though a West Indian in blood, and to a great degree in temperament, he was in other respects very much of an Englishman. He was born at Southgate, Middlesex, not far from Edmonton, and on the edge of that still woody and charmingly rural district called Enfield Chase. In his "Autobiography" he says, it is a pleasure to him to know that he was born " in so sweet a village as South- gate," adding that " Middlesex in general is a scene of trees and meadows, of 'greenery' and nestling cottages; and Southgate is a prime specimen of Middlesex. It is a place lying out of the way of innovation ; therefore it has the X\n LEIGH HUNT. pure, sweet air of antiquity about it." It is touching to find the grey, battered old writer recalHng in his age the associations of his infancy. " I wander in imagination," he says, in the work aheady quoted, " through the spots marked in the neighbourhood, with their pleasant names — Wood- side, Wood Green, Palmer Green, Nightingale Hall, &c. — and fancy my father and mother listening to the nightingales, and loving the new little baby, who has now lived to see more years tlian they did." The date of his birth was the 19th of October, 1784 — the day before that on which Lord Palmerston was born. The chief — indeed, the only systematic — part of Leigh Hunt's education was at Christ's Hospital, of which, in the days of Boyer, he has given an account worthy to rank side by side with those of Lamb and Coleridge.* He was to have completed his education at one of the universities, and to have gone into the Church, like his father ; but religious scruples stood in the way of both designs, and probably the straitened means of the family would in itself have prevented their being carried out. "Unitarianism" and " Universalism" were not in favour in those days ; and Leigh soon went far- ther than either of his parents in dissent from the accepted opinions of the world in matters of faith. So, after a brief period of staying at home, reading, cultivating early friend- ships, haunting the London bookstalls, and writing very indif- ferent verses, he got into the way of journalism, as clever youths are apt to do when they have no more definite open- ing in life, and became the theatrical critic of the News, a paper belonging to his elder brother, John. His criticisms attracted attention, as they deserved to do, for, as I have * " Auto'iiograpliy," chaps, iii. and iv. LEIGH HUNT. XVll already remarked, they were witty and discriminating, far better in style than the common run of newspaper writing in those days, and thoroughly honest and impartial. It was cus- tomary at that time (have Ave entirely outgrown the custom?) for the gentlemen who " did the theatres " for the daily and weekly press to be on familiar terms with the managers and leading actors, and to flatter them in proportion to the amount of orders they got, and of good dinners they were permitted to enjoy. Leigh Hunt (then in his twenty-first year) made it a point of honour to know neither managers nor actors, and to accept no tickets of admission. The articles were unex- pectedly successful; for, after all that satirists have said, and will probably go on saying perpetually, about the dulness and corruption of mankind, nothing succeeds better in this world than a little wit and a little honesty. Leigh Hunt first made his name as a dramatic critic, and when he and his brother started the Examiner, at the commence- ment of 1808, its popularity was in some measure due to the fact of its being known to be conducted by the gentleman who had written the News theatricals, and to the further fact of dramatic criticism from the same pen being a chief feature in its contents. Those were days in which the stage was still a power, and when large classes of the community discussed the merits of rival actors and different styles of acting with as much warmth as others discussed politics. The Examiner, however, soon made itself a reputation for comments upon more important things than the doings of Drury Lane and Covent Garden managers. Its honesty, independence, and fearlessness in the handling of affairs of state, obtained for it the estimation of all the liberal thinkers of that time, and the still more flattering enmity of the XVIU LEIGH HUNT. Prince Regent and his Government. When it began, Leigh Hunt was a clerk in the War Office, but he soon gave up that position, in order that he might not be trammelled in his remarks on the great. The policy of the Examinei', never- theless, was not Republican or Jacobinical. It neither reviled the French Revolution nor idolised it. It was for putting down the ambition and rapacity of Buonaparte, and for maintaining all the bases of the English Constitu- tion, with those ameliorations which time had necessitated, and with an extension of popular power equivalent to what was granted many years later in the Reform Bill of 1832. In these days of Tory democracy, and of democracy not Tory, we should probably look on the politics of the brothers Hunt (for the excellent sense, sound practical knowledge, and sterling honesty of John should not be forgotten) as a little too mild and cautious. Even in respect to religion, they ranged themselves with the Church of England, though dissenting on some important doctrinal points, and anticipating the tone of reverential inquiry and large toleration now held by many to be essential to reli- gion itself. The period was a dark one for Liberalism of all kinds, and Leigh Hunt differed on many grounds from the comfortable and lazy acquiescence of society. He suf- fered accordingly, as such men will sufter, and are proud to suffer. The Examiner was prosecuted several times for the freedom of its comments on public affairs; and at length, on the 2 2d of March, 181 2, an unusually bold article on the Prince Regent, provoked by a piece of disgusting adulation on the part of the Morning Post, laid the enterprising brothers under a sentence of two years' imprisonment in separate jails, accompanied by a fine of p^Soo each. LEIGH HUNT. XIX The Piince unquestionably deserved everything that was said of him in the incriminated article ; yet it is not to be wondered at that the Government of the day should have thought it necessary to prosecute the author and publisher, nor is it surprising that George himself should have desired to give a return blow for one which must have made him wince. A man may be the greatest criminal alive ; but if I beat him in the public streets, it is not unnatural that he should knock me down. I am therefore not inclined to join in the exclamations that have sometimes been made about the cruelty of the sentence. I am very glad that the article was written, and I sympathise with the sufferings of the brothers ; but it cannot be disputed that the remarks were in the highest degree libellous. We sometimes demand of princes a greater amount of magnanimity than we are com- monly in the habit of exhibiting ourselves, or than belongs to ordinary nature ; we expect that they shall submit to the most extreme attacks without stirring a finger in self-defence. John and Leigh Hunt did their duty in exposing the wretched flattery of the Mortiing Post ; the Prince did no more than was natural, or than he was legally entitled to do, in punishing the committers of the assault. This is really the sum of the whole business. His two years' imprisonment did Leigh Hunt both harm and good. It furnished the Tories for many years to come with a stone to fling at him whenever they wanted to be personal ; and, on the other hand, it advanced his reputa- tion with the Liberals, and brought him many friends. During his imprisonment, he made the acquaintance of Hazlitt, Bentham, and Byron ; and his counsel at the trial was no less a man than Brougham. Keats he did not B XX LEIGH HUNT. know until somewhat later. His mind seemed to ripen a good deal from that time. He made his prison rooms as pretty and cheerful as he could, cultivated a little garden in one of the small yards of the jail, and continued to write Liberalism from week to week in the Examiner, besides employing his pen on criticism and poetry. To this period belong the " Story of Rimini " and other works. It was in the prison, also, that Leigh Hunt first became intimate with Shelley, though he had slightly known him before. His close friendship with that remarkable genius (who helped him in his pecuniary difficulties with signal generosity) had an important influence on his fate. It caused him to be identified with some opinions which he did not share, and it drew down upon his head the rancorous vituperation of the Tory writers in Blackwood's Magazine and the Quarterly Review. Leigh Hunt's character suffered for many years in public esteem, in consequence of the venomous false- hoods concerning him and his friends circulated by those two periodicals. The shallow and noisy cry about the " cockney school " of ■wi'iters, moreover, affected the sale of his works ; and with the triumph of reactionary principles under the long administration of Lords Liverpool and Castlereagh, the success of the Examiner declined. With an increasing family, and a load of debt (the latter partly resulting from the Government prosecutions to which I have alluded, and the fine imposed for the libel on the Prince Regent), Leigh Hunt had for several years to fight a diffi- cult and discouraging battle, and it cannot be denied that his troubles were increased by a natural inability to under- stand the mysteries of pounds, shillings, and pence. At length, towards the close of 182 1, Shelley and Lord Byron, LEIGH HUNT. XXI who were then in Italy, invited Leigh Hunt to settle there with his family, and to start, in conjunction with his two poetical friends, a new quarterly periodical for the advocacy of liberal opinions. The inducement was very great, and he went. But the project was disastrous in every respect. Shelley was drowned almost immediately after Leigh Hunt's arrival at Pisa; the contemplated periodical — which was called the Liberal : Verse and Prose from i/ie South — proved a failure, notwithstanding that it contained some of Byron's most celebrated poems, besides other admirable matter; and Byron and Hunt soon quarrelled. The consequence was, that the latter and his family were left in a foreign country without the means of life, and a period of suffering ensued, which ever afterwards darkened the recollection of that beautiful and poetic land in the mind of Leigh Hunt. On his return to England, he wrote a book about Lord Byron (then deceased) which he afterwards regretted, because it was conceived in a spirit of embittered memory ; but he always maintained that the noble poet had treated him ill in their common Italian venture. From the period of his return to England, in the autumn of 1825 to the time of his death in the autumn of 1859 — a space of four-and-thirty years — Leigh Hunt lived a very retired life, incessantly reading or writing, battling with adverse fortune, and sometimes nearly succumbing to it, acquiring new friends among the younger generation of writers, and losing old ones by the inexorable decrees of nature. Year by year he gave himself less to politics than formerly, and more to literature for its own sake, to which his personal predilections and special aptitudes undoubtedly led him in the main. As early as 1810-12, he had edited a XXII LEIGH HUNT. Quarterly Magazine, chiefly devoted to literatvire, called the Reflector; in 1819-20-21, he had issued the weekly collec- tion of essays entitled the Ifidicator ; and he now reverted to this species of writing. He started, or edited, many perio- dicals — the Companion (1828), the TTz/^r (1830-31-32), the London Journal ( 1 83 4-3 5 ), the Mojithly Repository (1837-38), and some others ; and he wrote many books, ranging over several departments of literature. In 1840, and again in 1858, he appeared as a dramatic author. "The Legend of Florence " was produced at Covent Garden during the management of the present Mr Charles Mathews and the late Madame Vestris ; and " Lovers' Amazements " saw gas- light at the Lyceum. As he wore on in life, Leigh Hunt acquired the reputation and authority of a veteran ; and as the noise of the old battles receded farther and farther into the distance, and he more and more refrained from engaging in new ones, the kindliness of his nature, and the fascinating gracefulness of his conversation and manners, won to his side many former enemies, and created for him many new friends. Professor Wilson, his sometime enemy of Black- wood, not only expressed privately to Leigh Hunt his regret for the injustice he had done him, at the same time inviting him to write in the Magazine (an offer which was declined), but, in the number for August, 1834, publicly retracted the slanders which in earlier days he had helped to disseminate, spoke of his old enemy in the highest terms, and made use of that magnificent phrase, worthy to be written in letters of gold — " The animosities are mortal, but the humanities live for ever." The Government of Lord John Russell, in 1847, acknowledged the value of Hunt's services to Liberalism and to literature by a pension of ^200 a year; and, during the LEIGH HUNT. rxin last ten or fifteen years of his existence, strangers from afar — from all parts of the United Kingdom, and from America — sought the venerable poet and essayist in his humble study, and left it with wealthier, and doubtless with brighter, memories. His life was in several respects a life of trouble, but his cheerfulness was such that he was, upon the whole, happier than some men who have had fewer griefs to wrestle with. Death often stabbed him in his tenderest affections ; and the loss of his youngest son, Vincent, from consumption, in 1852, was a calamity from which the father never re- covered. But his darkest clouds had more than a silver lining ; they had the golden suffusion and interpenetration of a quenchless sunlight. In the two volumes of " Corre- spondence," edited in 1862 by his eldest son, my friend Mr Thornton Hunt, we see him as those who knew him familiarly saw him in his every-day life : sometimes over- clouded with the shadow of affliction, but more often bright and hopeful, and at all times taking a keen delight in beautiful things ; in the exhaustless world of books and art; in the rising genius of young authors ; in the immortal language of music; in trees, and liowers, and old memorial nooks of London and its suburbs ; in the sunlight which came, as he used to say, like a visitor out of heaven, glorify- ing humble places ; in the genial intercourse of mind with mind ; in the most trifling incidents of daily life that spoke of truth and nature ; in the spider drinking from the water- drop which had fallen on his letter from some flowers while he was writing ; in the sunset lighting up his " little homely black mantelpiece " till it kindled into " a solemnly gor geous presentment of black and gold;" in the domestici- ties of tamily life, and in the general progress of the world. XXIV LEIGH HUNT. A heait and soul so gifted could not but share largely in the happiness with which the Divine Ruler of the universe has compensated our sorrows ; and he had loving hearts about him to the last, to sweeten all. The end reached him on the 28th of August, 1859, in the seventy-fifth year of his age. He was buried in Kensal Green Cemetery, and a monument to his memory (originally proposed by Mr S. C Hall, and subscribed for by numerous friends and admirers) is about to be erected over the grave. His health had been failing for some time before, and he died, with entire tranquillity, at the house of his friend and relative, Mr Charles Reynell, at Putney. " It is an interesting incident," says his son, in a Postscript to the second edition of the "Autobiography" (i860), "that his very last efforts were devoted to aid the relatives ot Shelley in vindicating the memory of the friend who had gone so many years before him" (in connexion with the work entitled "Shelley Memorials"). "His death was simply exhaustion : he broke off his work to lie down and repose. So gentle was the final approach that he scarcely recognised it till the very last, and then it came without terrors. His physical suffering had not been severe ; at the latest hour he said that his only ' uneasiness' was failing breath. And that failing breath was used to express his sense of the inexhaustible kindnesses he had received from the family who had been so unexpectedly made his nurses,' — to draw from one of his sons, by minute, eager, and searching ques- tions, all that he could learn about the latest vicissitudes and growing hopes of Italy, — to ask the friends and children around him for news of those whom he loved, — and to send love and messages to the absent who loved him." LEIGH HUNT. XXV I enjoyed the friendship of Leigh Hunt for rather a long period, reckoning my boyish years as well as my years of young manhood. He was one of my father's oldest and most in- timate friends, for I believe their acquaintanceship began in the year 1810. It was in the early days of the Examiner, and my father, then a very young man, addressed a letter to the paper on some misperformance of Shakspeare at Drury Lane or Covent Garden, and, in his ignorance of journalistic ways, asked at the office to see the editor, that he might deliver the MS. into his own hands. The editor accordingly came out of his sanctum in Beaufort Buildings, Strand, and received the young enthusiast in dramatic pro- prieties very graciously. Having myself, nearly half a cen- tury later, done a good deal of journalistic work in those same Beaufort Buildings, I cannot help recalling this little incident with a certain pleasure. In subsequent years my father came to know Leigh Hunt intimately, and he was among those who visited him in Horsemonger Lane Jail. From 1817 to 1822, they had occasional business con- nexions ; for my father, having started as a publisher, issued some of Hunt's works from his office, together with the first volume of Keats, and several of Shelley's poems. He and Leigh Hunt died within three months of each other, and their friendship extended over nearly half a century. One of Leigh Hunt's latest writings was an account of my father, published shortly after his death, and forming a number of the Occasional, a series of papers written by Hunt, during the closing months of his life, in the Specta- tor, then under the editorship of his eldest son. Less than three months later, I myself, at the request of that son, wrote the final Occasio?ial, wliich was of course devoted XXVI LEIGH HUNT. to the memory of him who had originated and carried on the series. I can recollect Leigh Hunt almost as long as I can recol? lect anybody. He was grey-headed, and a somewhat vener- able-looking man, even when first I knew him, though at that time he was a little under fifty ; but doubtless my childish eyes exaggerated the appearance of age. In later years he had almost a patriarchal look, and this was increased by the long, priest-like gown he always wore when sitting at home, and which admirably suited his fine tall figure and studious aspect. With reference to this garment, he would often quote Lamb's line in his sonnet written at Cambridge : — • " And I walk gowndd — feel unusual powers." Many are the evenings I have passed in his three last houses • — those in Edwardes Square, Kensington, Phillimore Ter- race, close by, and Cornwall Road, Hammersmith ; and they will always remain among the happiest recollections of my life. The sitting-room in each had that look of intellectual elegance which men of liberal culture and inherent taste know so well how to produce even with the most moderate means. Books enriched one portion of the walls ; a few prints connected with poets and poetry adorned other parts ; a cast or two from Greek or Italian originals stood about, where they could be seen and admired ; and little vases of flowers were never wanting, if the season could furnish any. The conversation one used to get in the midst of these pleasant influences was of a piece with themselves. Leigh Hunt was an admirable talker. He did not " preach," as Coleridge is reported to have done; he was always ready to LEIGH HUNT. XXVll liear what others had to say, even when his visitors were 3''0ung men who could have suggested httk to a mind so ex- perienced and well-informed as his ; but he evidently knew his power in this respect, and loved (when in familiar society) to be " drawn out " on questions of literature, art, morals, biography, or human nature. He had been an im- mense reader all his life, and a very discursive reader too- much more so, I take it, than Lamb ; and he constantly surprised you by the extent of his knowledge. It is related of Dr Maginn that nobody ever saw him reading a book, and yet that he seemed to know all books. If the statement is correct, I should judge that his knowledge was superficial, as the literary knowledge of any man must be who is " never seen to read." But Leigh Hunt's acquaint- ance with books would bear examination, and you could not visit his house without seeing how it was that he managed to traverse so large a territory. At whatever hour you went in, you were certain to find him wnth a book in his hand, unless he was writing, and then the volumes in immediate requisition stood piled up high on either hand. He de- pended a good deal on the London Library, for his own collection was not large ; but most of his books were ster- ling, and so carefully read that they showed marks of the author's pen, in " scorings " and annotations, on almost every page. They are now, I believe, in America, and it is to be hoped that some one will publish these notes, which were particularly rich, I recollect, in Todd's "Spenser," in Croker's edition of Boswell's " Life of Johnson," and in the English translation of Plato published in " Bohn's Classical Library." Leigh Hunt's knowledge of literature extended over four languages besides his own, from all of which he XXVIU LEIGH HUNT. translated, — viz., Greek, Latin, Italian, and French. He had no knowledge of German, nor, I imagine, any great sym- pathy with the German genius, the complexion of his own mind being Southern — a mingling of the classic and the ro- mantic ; but he knew Goethe through translations, and ap- preciated him. It was the essence of this varied knowledge that you got in his conversation, mingled with the results of his own meditations, and the experiences of a chequered life ; all lit up by a soft and lambent wit, a singularly quaint and kindly humour, and a fancy that was never at a loss for the aptest illustrations, and the happiest turns of expression. All through the evening, the books referred to in conversa- tion accumulated on the little table placed at the side of his chair ; passages from favourite poets, or (though less fre- quently) prose authors, w^ere occasionally read in a fine sonorous voice, and with exquisite modulation ; and one o'clock in the morning would often take you unawares. The beautiful cheerfulness of the veteran — a cheerfulness with no hint of flippancy, and indeed not seldom infinitely touching in its reflected lights of tender and regretful memory ; the easy grace of his manners ; his boundless charity ; his belief in the essential goodness of human nature ; his hopefulness for the future of the world, and his profound, though informal, piety ; — all these things contri- buted to the peculiar charm of his companionship. I rank those evenings among my most cherished recollections, and prize them as we prize that which has gone from us for ever. The qualities which make a man of genius wxiat he is, are never to be met with again in precisely the same combination. We may find a second time friends as kind and as intellectual ; but a certain type of character is lost — • LEIGH HUNT. XXIX at least to his personal intimates — when a man like Leigh Hunt is removed from amongst us. It is as if a peculiar species of flower had died out, and, though other species may be as fine or finer, they will not supply the gap. The great ambition of Leigh Hunt was to achieve a name as a poet ; but he will be known to posterity less in connexion with his verse than with his prose. Undoubtedly he has written some very beautiful poetry. The " Story of Rimini " has many passages full of a rich, southern luxury of feeling and warmth of tone, and others that are steeped in pathos. " Captain Sword and Captain Pen " exhibits in parts a terrible power of word-painting, descriptive of the agonies of a battle-field. Many of his lighter pieces are distinguished by sparkling wit and fancy, and the two Eastern poems, " Mahmoud " and " Abou ben Adhem," are models of powerful and concentrated narrative. But his imagination was not strong ; he could seldom get rid of his own personality ; and what he has so admirably said of Charles Lamb, in explaining his deficiencies in this respect, may also be pronounced of himself. " He sat at the receipt of impressions, rather than commanded them."* His dramas are charming ni many respects ; but they are not sufficiently dramatic to keep a place on the stage. The critical habit, or disposition to comment, was more natural to him than the power to originate ; and thus we often find his poems spoiled by the intrusion of what is simply essay- writing in verse. It is in fact as an essayist and critic that Leigh Hunt will mainly live. The papers contained in the present volume are but a fraction of his writings in this respect ; but they show not a little of the riches of his * Introductory Essay to " The Book of the Sonnet." XXX LEIGH HUNT. mind. They are among the most admirable essays in the English language. Buoyant in manner as they mostly are, they have a substratum of thought. A kindly wisdom looks out of them, smiling, yet often with a gravity beneath the smile; for they are deeply and tenderly human. In early life, the southern gaiety of Hunt's animal spirits occasionally found vent in a sort of boyish friskiness, which people mistook for frivolity, though it was not really so ; but after middle age this sobered down into a graver, though never a less cheerful, mood. Now gay, now humorous, now witty, now reflective, now analytical, and invariably literary, these essays pass through many lights and shades of feeling, and are at home in all. Addison had not half as much variety, and his views of life and nature had nothing like the subtlety and depth of Hunt's. Lamb had a richer humour, a more singular personality, a more tragic intensity of pathos ; but his range was less — his sympathies were not so catholic. Leigh Hunt's criticism may never have reached the majestic and sonorous heights of Hazlitt's masterpieces; it had less of eloquence and force ; but it was more reliable and more even. Its quality was exquisitely refined and delicate — the result of a natural sensibility, educated and trained by long and careful study ; but it is a mistake to suppose that its only characteristic was sympathy. No doubt, sympathy was a chief element; but not more so than judgment. Leigh Hunt has never had justice done him for the excellent sense and sanity of his mind. Where Coleridge would rave, and Hazlitt be paradoxical, and Lamb grow hysterical with emotion, or beautifully quaint with fantastic eccentricity. Hunt seemed always to preserve the balance of his faculties. With great powers of admir- LEIGH HUNT. XXXJ ation, a strong sense of enjoyment, and an ardent dis- position, he nevertheless appeared to know the exact hne beyond which hterary worship passes into superstition. Like all men who are oblig'^d to write for bread, Leigh Hunt wrote many things that do not merit reprinting. Of his numerous periodicals, he only succeeded in establishing the Examiner ; and the reasons are too obvious to permit of the result being surprising. They were started with insufficient capital, and were made to depend too much on the efforts of one man. After a while, Leigh Hunt would be ill or overworked. Then came excuses that the editor could not furnish the usual amount of matter, and old articles, that had appeared years before in other periodicals, would be made to do duty for original matter, in default of a staft of contributors to fall back upon. It is amusing sometimes to observe Hunt's excessively personal confidences with the reader under the dual shadow of the editorial "we." His greatest undertaking in the way of periodicals was the Tatlcr, a daily paper of which he was the chief support, and in which he wrote literary criticisms, theatrical criticisms (penned in the small hours at the printing-office, after seeing the play), and general articles. He continued this tre- mendous work for nearly a year and a half, and was almost killed by the fatigue and the late hours. One of his characteristics has not been fully recognised, and that was, his great capacity for work. He had periods of enforced idleness, and, like all bookish men, he was fond of medi- tative ease. But his best writings were the result of very considerable labour and painstaking ; of the most con- scientious investigation of facts, where facts were needed ; and of a comiDlete devotion of his faculties towards the XXXH LEIGH HUNT. object to be accomplished. Even when an old man, he would sometimes sit up through the greater part of the night, in order to complete work in hand. Notwithstand- ing his great experience, he was not (except on special occasions) a very rapid writer. He corrected, excised, reconsidered, and elaborated his productions (unless when pressed for time) with the most minute attention to details; and the habit increased on him the older he grew. In his earlier days, the life of Leigh Hunt was a life of war; in his later days it was a life of peace, chequered with sorrows. The courage with which, in poverty and trouble, he fought the enemies of his youth, dealing hard blows and grievous gashes, neither giving nor asking quarter, and varying his attacks from prose to verse with infinite spirit and address, is one of the gallantest things on record. In the last five-and-twenty years of his long life, however, he desired to be at peace with all men, and to help the world by sympathy rather than by antagonism. In both ways (for both are necessary) he aided the march ot humanity, and, though he suffered much, he did not miss his reward. He gathered friends and admirers about him while he was yet in the flesh, and his memory is a perfume in the heart of literature. EDMUND OLLIER. *^* The essays contained in the present volume are all from the Indicator, and are reprinted from the first edition of that work. They are among the best and most characteristic of their author's productions, and several (as the reader will find pointed out in their respective places) were special favourites with Lamb, Hazlitt, Keats, &c. ESSAYS BY LEIGH HUNT. SOCIAL GENEALOGY. IT is a curious and pleasant thing to consider, that a link of personal acquaintance can be traced up from the authors of our own times to those of Shakspeare, and to Shak- speare himself. Ovid, in recording with fondness his intimacy with Propertius and Horace, regrets that he had only seen Virgil (Trist., Book IV. v. 51). But still he thinks the sight of him worth remembering. And Pope, when a child, prevailed on some friends to take him to a coffee-house which Dryden frequented, merely to look at him ; which he did, to his great satisfaction. Now, such of us as have shaken hands with a living poet, might be able, perhaps, to reckon up a series of connectmg shakes to the very hand that wrote of Hamlet, and of Falstaff, and of Desdemona. With some living poets, it is certain. There is Thomas Moore, for instance, who knew Sheridan. Sheridan knew John- son, who was the friend of Savage, who knew Steele, who knew Pope. Pope was intimate with Congreve, and Congreve with Dryden. Dryden is said to have visited Milton. Milton is said to have known Davenant ; and to have been saved by him C 2, 34 LEIGH HUNTS ESSAYS. from the revenge of the restored court, in return for having saved Davenant from the revenge of the Commonwealth. But if the link between Dryden and Milton, and Milton and Davenant, is somewhat apocryphal, or rather dependent on tradition (for Richardson, the painter, tells us the latter from Pope, who had it from Betterton the actor, one of Davenant's company), it may be carried at once from Dryden to Davenant, with whom he was unquestionably intimate. Davenant, then, knew Hobbes, who knew Bacon, who knew Ben Jonson, who was intimate with Beaumont and Fletcher, Chapman, Donne, Drayton, Camden, Selden, Clarendon, Sydney, Raleigh, and perhaps all the great men of Elizabeth's and James's time, the greatest of them all undoubtedly. Thus have we a link of " beamy hands " from our own times up to Shakspeare. In this friendly genealogy we have omitted the numerous side-branches or common friendships ; but of those we shall give an account by and by. It may be mentioned, however, in order not to omit Spenser, that Davenant resided some time in the family of Sir Fulke Greville Lord Brooke, the friend of Sir Philip Sydney. Spenser's intimacy with Sydney is mentioned by himself, in a letter, still extant, to Gabriel Harvey. We will now give the authorities for our intellectual pedigree. Sheridan is mentioned in Boswell as being admitted to the cele- brated club, of which Johnson, Goldsmith, and others were members. He had then, if we remember, just written his " School for Scandal," which made him the more welcome. Of Johnson's friendship with Savage (we cannot help beginning the sentence with his favourite leading preposition), the well- known Life is an interesting and honourable record. It is said that in the commencement of their friendship they have some- times wandered together about London for want of a lodging ; — more likely, for Savage's want of it, and Johnson's fear of offending him by offering a share of his own. But we do not remember how this circumstance is related by BoswelL Savage's intimacy with Steele is recorded in a pleasant anec- SOCIAL GENEALOGY. 35 dote, which he told Johnson. Sir Richard once desired him, " with an air of the utmost importance," says his biographer, " to come very early to his house the next morning. Mr Savage came as he had promised, found the chariot at the door, and Sir Richard waiting for him, and ready to go out. What was intended, and whither they were to go, Savage could not con- jecture, and was not willing to inquire ; but immediately seated himself with Sir Richard. The coachman was ordered to drive, and they hurried with the utmost expedition to Hyde Park Corner, where they stopped at a petty tavern, and retired to a private room. Sir Richard then informed him that he intended to publish a pamphlet, and that he had desired him to come thither that he might write for him. They soon sat down to the work. Sir Richard dictated, and Savage wrote, till the dinner that had been ordered was put upon the table. Savage was surprised at the meanness of the entertainment, and after some hesitation ventured to ask for wine, which Sir Richard, not without reluctance, ordered to be brought. They then finished their dinner, and proceeded in their pamphlet, which they concluded in the afternoon. " Mr Savage then imagined that his task was over, and expected that Sir Richard would call for the reckoning, and return home ; but his expectations deceived him, for Sir Richard told him that he was without money, and that the pamphlet must be sold before the dinner could be paid for ; and Savage was therefore obliged to go and offer their new production to sale for two guineas, which with some difficulty he obtained. Sir Richard then returned home, having retired that day only to avoid his creditors, and composed the pamphlet only to dis- charge his reckoning." Steele's acquaintance with Pope, who wrote some papers for his " Guardian," appears in the letters and other works of the wits of that time. Johnson supposes that it was his friendly interference which attempted to bring Pope and Addison together after a jealous separation. Pope's friendship with 36 LEIGH hunt's essays. Congreve appears also in his letters. He also dedicated the " Iliad " to him, over the heads of peers and patrons. Congreve, whose conversation most likely partook of the elegance and wit of his writings, and whose manners appear to have rendered him an universal favourite, had the honour in his youth of attract- ing singular respect and regard from Dryden. He was publicly hailed by him as his successor, and affectionately bequeathed the care of his laurels. Dryden did not know who had been looking at him in the coffee-house. "Already I am worn with cares and age, And just abandoning th' ungrateful stage ; Unprofitably kept at Heaven's expense, I live a rent-charge on His providence. But you, whom every Muse and Grace adorn, Whom I foresee to better fortune born, Be kind to my remains ; and oh defend, Against your judgment, your departed friend ! Let not th' insulting foe my fame pursue, But shade those laurels which descend to you." Congreve did so with great tenderness. Dryden is reported to have asked Milton's permission to turn his " Paradise Lost " into a rhyming tragedy, which he called " The State of Innocence, or the Fall of Man ;" a work such as might be expected from such a mode of alteration. The vener- able poet is said to have answered, " Ay, young man, you may tag my verses if you will." Be the connexion, however, of Dryden with Milton, or of Milton with Davenant, as it may, Dryden wrote the alteration of Shakspeare's " Tempest," as it is now perpetrated, in conjunction with Davenant. They were great hands, but they should not have touched the pure gran- deur of Shakspeare. The intimacy of Davenant with Hobbes is to be seen by their correspondence prefixed to " Gondibert." Hobbes was at one time secretary to Lord Bacon, a singularly illustrious instance of servant and master. Bacon is also sup- posed to have had Ben Jonson for a retainer in some capacity ; but it is certain that Jonson had his acquaintance, for he records it in his " Discoveries." And had it been otherwise, his link SOCIAL GENEALOGY. 37 with the preceding writers could be easily supplied through the medium of Greville and Sydney, and indeed of many others of his contemporaries. Here, then, we arrive at Shakspeare, and feel the electric virtue of his hand. Their intimacy, dashed a little, perhaps, with jealousy on the part of Jonson, but main- tained to the last by dint of the nobler part of him and of Shakspeare's irresistible fineness of nature, is a thing as notori- ous as their fame. Fuller says : — " Many were the wit-combates betwixt [Shakspeare] and Ben Jonson, which two I behold like a Spanish great galleon and an English man-of-war. Master Jonson (like the former) was built far higher in learning : solid, but slow in his performances. Shakspeare, with the English man-of-war, lesser in bulk, but lighter in sailing, could turn with all tides, tack about, and take advantage of all winds, by the quickness of his wit and invention." This is a happy simile, with the exception of what is insinuated about Jonson's greater solidity. But let Jonson show for himself the affection with which he regarded one who did not irritate or trample down rivalry, but rose above it like the quiet and all-gladdening sun, and turned emulation to worship :— " Soul of the age ! Th' applause ! delight ! the wonder of our stage I My Shakspeare, rise ! I will not lodge thee by Chaucer or Spenser, or bid Beaumont lie A little .urther, to make thee a room ; Thou art a monument without a tomb; And art alive still, while thy book doth live. And we have wits to read, and praise to give. He was not of an age, but for all time.'' PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS CONNECTED WITH THE METROPOLIS. ONE of the best secrets of enjoyment is the art of cultivat- ing pleasant associations. It is an art that of necessity- increases with the stock of our knowledge ; and though in acquiring our knowledge we must encounter disagreeable associations also, yet, if we secure a reasonable quantity of health by the way, these will be far less in number than the agreeable ones : for, unless the circumstances which gave rise to the associations press upon us, it is only from want of health that the power of throwing off these burdensome images be- comes suspended. And the beauty of this art is, that it does not insist upon pleasant materials to work on. Nor, indeed, does health. Health will give us a vague sense of delight, in the midst of objects that would teaze and oppress us during sickness. But healthy association peoples this vague sense with agreeable images. It will relieve us, even when a painful sympathy with the distresses of others becomes a part of the very health of our minds. For instance, we can never go through St Giles's, but the sense of the extravagant inequalities in human condition presses more forcibly upon us ; but some pleasant images are at hand even there to refresh it. They do not displace the others, so as to injure the sense of public duty which they excite ; they only serve to keep our spirits fresh for their task, and hinder them PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS OF THE METROPOLIS. 39 from running into desperation or hopelessness. In St Giles's Church lie Chapman, the earliest and best translator of Homer; and Andrew Marvell, the wit and patriot, whose poverty Charles II. could not bribe. We are as sure to think of these two men, and of all the good and pleasure they have done to the world, as of the less happy objects about us. The steeple of the church itself, too, is a handsome one ; and there is a flock of pigeons in that neighbourhood, which we have stood with great pleasure to see careering about it of a fine afternoon, when a western wind had swept back the smoke towards the city, and showed the white of the stone steeple piercing up into a blue sky. So much for St Giles's, whose very name is a nuisance with some. It is dangerous to speak disrespectfully of old districts. Who would suppose that the Borough was the most classical ground in the metropolis ? And yet it is un- doubtedly so. The Globe Theatre was there, of which Shak- speare himself was a proprietor, and for which he wrote his plays. Globe Lane, in which it stood, is still extant, we believe, under that name. It is probable that he lived near it : it is certain that he must have been much there. It is also certain that on the Borough side of the river, then and still called the Bank- side, in the same lodging, having the same wardrobe, and, some say, with other participations more remarkable, lived Beaumont and Fletcher. In the Borough also, at St Saviour's, lie Fletcher and Massinger in one grave ; in the same church, under a monument and effigy, lies Chaucer's contemporary, Gower ; and from an inn in the Borough, the existence of which is still boasted, and the site pointed out by a picture and inscription, Chaucer sets out his pilgrims and himself on their famous road to Canterbury. To return over the water, who would expect anything poetical from East Smithfield ? Yet there was born the most poetical even of poets, — Spenser. Pope was born within the sound of Bow-bell, in a street no less anti-poetical than Lombard Street. So was Gray, in Cornhill. So was Milton, in Bread Street, 40 LEIGH HUNTS ESSAYS. Cheapside. The presence of the same great poet and patriot has given happy memories to many parts of the metropolis. He hved in St Bride's Churchyard, Fleet Street ; in Aldersgate Street, in Jewin Street, in Barbican, in Bartholomew Close ; in Holborn, looking back to Lincoln's Inn Fields ; in Holborn, near Red Lion Square ; in Scotland Yard ; in a house looking to St James's Park, now belonging to an eminent writer on legis- lation, and lately occupied by a celebrated critic and meta- physician ; and he died in the Artillery Walk, Bunhill Fields, and was buried in St Giles's, Cripplegate, Ben Jonson, who was born " in Hartshorne Lane, near Char- ing Cross," was at one time " master " of a theatre in Barbican. He appears also to have visited a tavern called the Sun "and Moon, in Aldersgate Street, and is known to have frequented, with Beaumont and others, the famous one called the Mermaid, which was in Cornhill. Beaum^ont, writing to him from the country in an epistle full of jovial wit, says : — "The sun (which doth the greatest comfort bring To absent friends, because the self-same thing They know they see, however absent) is Here our best haymaker (forgive me this ! It is our country style) : — in this warm shine I lie, and dream of your full Mermaid wine. Methinks the little wit I had is lost Since I saw you: for wit is like a rest Held up at tennis, which men do the best With the best gamesters. What things have we seen Done at the Mermaid ! heard words that have been So nimble, and so full of subtle flame, As if that every one from whom they came Had meant to put his whole wit in a jest, And had resolved to live a fool the rest Of his dull life then when there hath been thrown Wit able enough to justify the town For three days past, — wit that might warrant be For the whole city to talk foolishly Till that were cancell'd ; and, when that was gone. We left an air behind us, which alone Was able to make the two next companies Right witty; — though but downright fools, mere wi5c. PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS OF THE METROPOLIS. 4 1 The Other celebrated resort of the great wits of that time was the Devil Tavern, in Fleet Street, close to Temple Bar. Ben Jonson lived also in Bartholomew Close, where Milton after- wards lived. It is in the passage from the cloisters of Christ's Hospital into St Bartholomew's. Aubrey gives it as a com- mon opinion, that at the time when Jonson's father-in-law made him help him in his business of bricklayer, he worked with his own hands upon the Lincoln's Inn garden-wall, which looks upon Chancery Lane, and which seems old enough to have some of his illustrious brick-and-mortar still remaining. Under the cloisters in Christ's Hospital (which stand in the heart of the city unknown to most persons, like a house kept invisible for young and learned eyes) lie buried a multitude of persons of all ranks ; for it was once a monastery of Grey Friars. Among them is John of Bourbon, one of the prisoners taken at the battle of Agincourt. Here also lies Thomas Burdett, ancestor of the present Sir Francis, who was put to death in the reign of Edward IV., for wishing the horns of a favourite white stag, which the king had killed, in the body of the person who advised him to do it. And here too (a sufficing contrast) lies Isabella, wife of Edward II. — " She-wolf of France, with unrelenting fangs, That tore the bowels of her mangled mate." Gray. Her "mate's" heart was buried with her, and placed upon her bosom ! a thing that looks like the fantastic incoherence of a dream. It is well we did not know of her presence when at school ; or, after reading one of Shakspeare's tragedies, we should have run twice as fast round the cloisters at night-time as we used. Camden, " the nourice of Antiquitie," received part of his education in this school ; and here also, not to men- tion a variety of others known in the literary world, were bred two of the most powerful and deep-spirited writers of the present day ; whose visits to the cloisters we well remember. 42 LEIGH hunt's ESSAYS. In a palace on the site of Hatton Garden, died John of Gaunt. Brook House, at the corner of the street of that name in Hol- born, was the residence of the celebrated Sir Fulke Greville, Lord Brook, the "friend of Sir Philip Sydney." In the same street died, by a voluntary death, of poison, that extraordinary person, Thomas Chatterton — "The sleepless soul, that perish'd in his pride." Wordsworth. He was buried in the workhouse in Shoe Lane ; — a circum- stance, at which one can hardly help feeling a movement of indignation. Yet what could beadles and parish officers know about such a being? No more than Horace Walpole. In Gray's Inn lived, and in Gray's Inn garden meditated. Lord Bacon. In Southampton Row, Holborn, Cowper was a fellow- clerk to an attorney with the future Lord Chancellor Thurlow. At the Fleet Street corner of Chancery Lane, Cowley, we believe, was born. In Salisbury Court, Fleet Street, was the house of Thomas Sackville, first Earl of Dorset, the precursor of Spenser, and one of the authors of the first regular English tragedy. On the demolition of this house, part of the ground was occupied by the celebrated theatre built after the Restora- tion, at which Betterton performed, and of which Sir William Davenant was manager. Lastly, here was the house and print- ing-office of Richardson. In Bolt Court, not far distant, lived Dr Johnson, who resided also for some time in the Temple. A list of his numerous other residences is to be found in Boswell.* Congreve died in Surrey Street, in the Strand, at his own house. At the corner of Beaufort Buildings was Lilly's, the perfumer, at whose house the " Tatler'^ was published. In Maiden Lane, Covent Garden, Voltaire lodged while in London, at the sign of the White Peruke. Tavistock Street was then, we believe, the Bond Street of the fashionable world ; as Bow * The Temple must have had many eminent inmates. Among them, it is believed, V/as Chaucer, who is also said, upon the strength of an old record, to havo been fined two shillings for beating a Franciscan friar in Fleet Street. PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS OF THE METROPOLIS. 43 Street was before. The change of Bow Street from fashion to the police, with the theatre still in attendance, reminds one of the spirit of the " Beggar's Opera." Button's Coffee-house, the resort of the wits of Queen Anne's time, was in Russell Street, — we believe, near where the Hummums now stand. We think we recollect reading, also, that in the same street, at one of the corners of Bow Street, was the tavern where Dryden held regal possession of the arm-chair. The whole of Covent Garden is classic ground, from its association with the dramatic and other wits of the times of Dryden and Pope. Butler lived, perhaps died, in Rose Street, and was buried in Covent Garden Church- yard ; where Peter Pindar the other day followed him. IR Leicester Square, on the site of Miss Linwood's exhibition and other houses, was the town mansion of the Sydneys, Earls of Leicester, the family of Sir Philip and Algernon Sydney. In the same square lived Sir Joshua Reynolds. Dryden lived and died in Gerrard Street, in a house which looked backwards into the garden of Leicester House. Newton lived in St Martin's Street, on the south side of the square. Steele lived in Bury Street, St James's : he furnishes an illustrious precedent for the loungers in St James's Street, where a scandal-monger of those times delighted to detect Isaac Bickerstaff in the person of Captain Steele, idling before the coffee-houses, and jerking his leg and stick alternately against the pavement. We have men- tioned the birth of Ben Jonson near Charing Cross. Spenser died at an inn, where he put up on his arrival from Ireland, in King Street, Westminster, — the same which runs at the back of Parliament Street to the Abbey. Sir Thomas More lived at Chelsea. Addison lived and died in Holland House, Kensing- ton, now the residence of the accomplished nobleman who takes his title from it. In Brook Street, Grosvener Square, lived Handel ; and in Bentinck Street, Manchester Square, Gibbon. We have omitted to mention that De Foe kept a hosier's shop in Cornhill ; and that on the site of the present Southampton Buildings, Chancery Lane, stood the mansion of the Wriothes- 44 LEIGH HUNT S ESSAYS. leys, Earls of Southampton, one of whom was the celebrated friend of Shakspeare. But what have we not omitted also ? No less an illustrious head than the Boar s, in Eastcheap, — the Boar's Head Tavern, the scene of Falstaff's revels. We believe the place is still marked out by a similar sign. But who knows not Eastcheap and the Boar's Head ? Have we not all been there time out of mind ? And is it not a more real as well as notorious thing to us than the London Tavern, or the Crown and Anchor, or the Hummums, or White's, or What's-his- name's, or any other of your contemporary and fleeting taps ? But a line or two, a single sentence, in an author of former times, will often give a value to the commonest object. It not only gives us a sense of its duration, but we seem to be looking at it in company with its old observer ; and we are reminded at the same time of all that was agreeable in him. We never saw, for instance, even the gilt ball at the top of the College of Physicians, without thinking of that pleasant mention of it in Garth's " Dispensary," and of all the wit and generosity of that amiable man : — " Not far from that most celebrated place,* Where angry Justice shows her awful face ; Where little villains must submit to fate, That great ones may enjoy the world in state ; There stands a dome, majestic to the sight, And sumptuous arches bear its oval height : A golden globe, placed high with artful skill, Seems, to the distant sight, a gilded pill." Gay, in describing the inconvenience of the late narrow part of the Strand, by St Clement's, took away a portion of its un- pleasantness to the next generation, by associating his memory with the objects in it. We did not miss without regret even the " combs " that hung " dangling in your face " at a shop which he describes, and which was standing till the improvements took place. The rest of the picture is still alive, ("Trivia," Book III.) * The OKI Bailey. PLEASANT RECOLLECTIONS OF THE METROPOLIS. 4$ " Where the fair columns of St Clement stand, Whose straiten'd bounds encroach upon the Strand t Where the low pent-house bows the walker's head, And the rough pavement wounds the yielding tread ; Where not a post protects the narrow space, And, strung in twines, combs dangle in thy face ; Summon at once thy courage, rouse thy care. Stand firm, look back, be resolute, beware. Forth issuing from steep lanes, the collier's steeds Drag the black load ; another cart succeeds ; Team follows team, crowds heap'd on crowds appear, And wait impatient till the road grow clear." There is a touch in the winter picture in the same poem, vhich everybody will recognise : — " At White's the harness'd chairman idly stands. And swings around his waist his tingling hands." The bewildered passenger in the Seven Dials is compared to Theseus in the Cretan Labyrinth. And thus we come round to the point at which we began. Before we rest our wings, however, we must take another dart over the city, as far as Stratford-at-Bow, where, with all due tenderness for boarding-school French, a joke of Chaucer's has existed as a piece of local humour for nearly four hundred and fifty years. Speaking of the Prioress, who makes such a delicate figure among his Canterbury Pilgrims, he tells us, among her other accomplishments, that^ " French she spake full faire and featously ;" adding, with great gravity — "After the school of Stratford-atte-Bowe ; For French of Paris was to her unknowe." [Note. — The "eminent writer on legislation " mentioned in p. 40 as occupying Milton's house in Westminster, was Jeremy Bentham ; the previous tenant — a "celebrated critic and metaphysician" — was Hazlitt. The two "powerful and deep-spirited writers" alluded to as scholars at Christ's Hospital (p. 41), were Coleridge and Lamb. London has altered a good deal since this essay was written. The College of Physicians, for instance, has gone, and Picket Street, which Leigh Hunt mentions as a recent improvement (it supplanted Butcher Row), L- now a thing of the past. — E. O.J ON THE HOUSEHOLD GODS OF THE ANCIENTS. THE Ancients had three kinds of household gods, — the Daimon (Daemon) or Genius, the Penates, and the Lares. The first was supposed to be a spirit allotted to every man from his birth, some say with a companion, and that one of them was a suggester of good thoughts, and the other of evil. It seems, however, that the Genius was a personification of the conscience, or rather of the prevailing impulses of the mind, or the other self of a man ; and it was in this sense most likely that Socrates condescended to speak of his well-known Daemon, Genius, or Familiar Spirit, who, as he was a good man, always advised him to a good end. The Genius was thought to paint ideas upon the mind in as lively a manner as if in a looking- glass ; upon which we chose which of them to adopt. Spenser, a most learned as well as imaginative poet, describes it, in one of his most comprehensive though not most poetical stanzas, as " That celestial Powre, to whom the care Of life, and generation of all Tliat lives, pertaine in charge particulare ; Who wondrous things concerning our welfare, And straunge phantomes, doth lett us ofte foresee, And ofte of secret ills bids us beware : That is our Selfe, whom though we do not sec. Vet each doth in himselfe it well perceive to bee. " Therefore a god him sage antiquity Did wisely make." — Faery Queene, Book II. St. 47. ON THE HOUSEHOLD GODS OF THE ANCIENTS. 47 Of the belief in an Evil Genius, a celebrated example is fur- nished in Plutarch's account of Brutus's vision, of which Shak- speare has given so fine a version (Julius Caesar, Act IV. sc. 3). Beliefs of this kind seem traceable from one superstition to another, and in some instances are no doubt immediately so. But fear, and ignorance, and even the humility of knowledge, are at hand to furnish them, where precedent is wanting. There is no doubt, however, that the Romans, who copied and in general vulgarised the Greek mythology, took their Genius from the Greek Daimon ; and, as the Greek word has survived and taken shape in the common word Daemon, which by scornful reference to the Heathen religion came at last to signify a Devil, so the Latin word Genius, not having been used by the trans- lators of the Greek Testament, has survived with a better mean- ing, and is employed to express our most genial and intellectual faculties. Such and such a man is said to indulge his genius — he has a genius for this and that art — he has a noble genius, an airy genius, an original and peculiar genius. And as the Romans, from attributing a genius to every man at his birth, came to attribute one to places and to soils, and other more comprehensive peculiarities, so we have adopted the same use of the term into our poetical phraseology. We speak also of the genius, or idiomatic peculiarity, of a language. One of the most curious and edifying uses of the word Genius took place in the English translation of the French "Arabian Nights," which speaks of our old friends the Genie and the Genies. This is nothing more than the French word retained from the original translator, who applied the Roman word Genius to the Arabian Dive or Elf. One of the stories with which Pausanias has enlivened his description of Greece is relative to a Genius. He says that one of the companions of Ulysses having been killed by the people of Temesa, they were fated to sacrifice a beautiful virgin every year to his manes. They were about to immolate one as usual, when Euthymus, a conqueror in the Olympic Games, 48 LEIGH hunt's essays. touched with pity at her fate and admiration of her beauty, fel\ in love with her, and resolved to try if he could not put an end to so terrible a custom. He accordingly got permission from the state to marry her, provided he could rescue her from her dreadful expectant. He armed himself, waited in the temple, and the Genius appeared. It was said to have been of an appalling presence. Its shape was every way formidable, its colour of an intense black ; and it was girded about with a wolf- skin. But Euthymus fought and conquered it ; upon which it fled madly, not only beyond the walls, but the utmost bounds of Temesa, and rushed into the sea. The Penates were gods of the house and family. Collectively speaking, they also presided over cities, public roads, and at last over all places with which men were conversant. Their chief government, however, was supposed to be over the most inner and secret part of the house, and the subsistence and wel- fare of its inmates. They were chosen at will out of the number of the gods, as the Roman in modern times chose his favourite saint. In fact, they were only the higher gods themselves, descending into a kind of household familiarity. They were the personification of a particular Providence. The most striking mention of the Penates which we can call to mind is in one of Virgil's most poetical passages. It is where they appear to -(Eneas, to warn him from Crete, and announce his destined empire in Italy (Book III. v. 147) : — " Nox erat, et terris animalia somniis habebat. Effigies sacrse Divum, Phrygiique Penates, Quos mecum a Troja, mediisque ex ignibus urbis Extuleram, visi ante oculos adstare jacentis In somnis, multo manifest! lumine, qua se Plena per insertas fundebat Luna fenestras." 'Twas night ; and sleep was on all living things. I lay, and saw before my veiy eyes Dread shapes of gods, and Phrygian deities, The great Penates ; whom with reverent joy I bore from out the heart of burning Troy. Plainly I saw them, standing in the light Which the moon pour'd into the room that night. ON THE HOUSEHOLD GODS OF THE ANCIENTS. 49 And again, after they had addressed him : — " Nee sopor illud erat ; sed coram agnoscere vultus, Velata5;que comas, prjesentiaque oravidebar: Turn gelidus toto manabat corpora sudor." It was no dream: I saw them face to face, Tlieir hooded hair ; and felt them so before ^ly being, that I burst at every pore. The Lares, or Lars, were the lesser and most familiar house- hold gods ; and though their offices were afterwards extended a good deal, in the same way as those of the Penates, with whom they are often wrongly confounded, their principal sphere was the fire-place. This was in the middle of the room ; and the statues of the Lares generally stood about it in little niches. They are said to have been in the shape of monkeys ; more likely mannikins, or rude little human images. Some were made of wax, some of stone, and others doubtless of any mate- rial for sculpture. They were represented with good-natured grinning countenances, were clothed in skins, and had little dogs at their feet. Some writers make them the offspring of the goddess Mania, who presided over the spirits of the dead ; and suppose that originally they were the same as those spirits ; which is a very probable as well as agreeable superstition, the old nations of Italy having been accustomed to bury their dead in their houses. Upon this supposition, the good or benevolent spirits were called Familiar Lares, and the evil or malignant ones Larvas and Lemures. Thus Milton, in his awful " Hymn on the Nativity " :— "In consecrated earth, And on the holy hearth. The Lars and Lemures moan with midnight plaint. In urns and altars round, A drear and dying sound Affrights the Flamens at their service quaint; And the chill marble seems to sweat, While each peculiar Power foregoes his wonted seat." But Ovid tells a story of a gossiping nymph Lara, who, having I) 50 LEIGH HUNT S ESSAYS. told Juno of her husband's amour with Juturna, was " sent to hell " by him, and courted by Mercury on the road ; the conse- quence of which was the birth of the Lares. This seems to have a natural reference enough to the gossiping over fire- places. It is impossible not to be struck with the resemblance between these lesser household gods and some of the offices of our old English elves and fairies. But of them more by and by. Dacier, in a note upon Horace (Book I., Od. 12), informs us, that in some parts of Languedoc, in his time, the fire-place was still called the Lar ; and that the name was also given to houses. Herrick, an excellent poet of the Anacreontic order in the time of Elizabeth, whose works we shall often have occasion to recommend to the reader, and who was visited perhaps more than any poet that ever lived with a sense of the pleasantest parts of the cheerful mythology of the ancients, has written some of his lively little odes upon the Lares. We have not them by us at this moment, but we remember one beginning — " It was, and still my care is, To worship you, the Lares." We take the opportunity of the Lars being mentioned in it, to indulge ourselves, and we hope our readers, in a little poem of Martial's, very charming for its simplicity. It is an epitaph on a child of the name of Erotion. " Hie festinata requiescit Erotion umbra, Crimine quam fati sexta peremit hiems. Quisquis eris nostri post me regnator agelli, Manibus exiguis annua justa dato. Sic Lare perpetuo, sic turba sospite, solus Flebilis in terra sit lapis iste tua." THE EPITAPH OF EROTION. Underneath this greedy stone Lies little sweet Erotion ; ON THE HOUSEHOLD GODS OF THE ANCIENTS. 5 1 Whom tlie Fates, with hearts as cold. Nipt away at six years old. Thou, whoever thou mayst be, That hast this small field after me, Let the yearly rites be paid To her little slender shade : So shall no disease or jar Hurt thy house, or chill thy Lar ; But this tomb here be alone The only melancholy stone. [Note. — Herrick can hardly be called a poet of "the time of Eliza- beth ", since he was only twelve years old when Elizabeth died, and was living in the reign of Charles II. — E. O.] LUDICROUS EXAGGERATION. MEN of wit sometimes lil:e to pamper a favourite joke into exaggeration, — into a certain corpulence of face- tiousness. Their relish of the thing makes them wish it as large as possible ; and the social enjoyment of it is doubled by its becoming more visible to the eyes of others. It is for this reason that jests in company are sometimes built up by one hand after another — " three-piled hyperboles " — till the over- done Babel topples and tumbles down amidst a merry confusion of tongues. Falstaff was a great master of this art. He loved a joke