M I i i =ri <-> i i o < s o^lOS ANCEtfjv i I I I i" | CT t^3 I i TWi 3 ^\)i .-Ji 1 1 tHC/l ^rav-sov^ ,= i .^ AW-UNIVfRJ^ ^ ^^F-1 , I 5 V U ^K^ 1 S Stack Annex PREFACE. j, 01 o r I ^HE motive from whence this compilation -*- originated, (for these sheets can hardly de- serve a higher name,) was the daily observation of the mischiefs attending the neglect of that duty which every man owes to his family, friends, or dependants, in the disposal and settlement of his property by Will. A neglect arising from a variety of causes ; the suddenness and violence of bodily indispositions, the distance of legal assistance, and the frequent mental incapacity of many persons to act for themselves, in this con- juncture. LET it be understood, that this is not intended as a treatise on all the nice distinctions which have so long arisen, and still continue to arise, on the construction of Wills : the legal questions which are so repeatedly contested in courts of justice are beyond the understanding of the common class of men, who cannot easily comprehend subtleties familiar to a lawyer. This work is meant for the use of such persons, chiefly, as are not acquainted a 2 either VI PREFACE. cither with the doctrines or the forms of la\v ; but who wish to be instructed how to act, without being under the necessity of communicating the knowledge of their private affairs to any other person. IT has been frequently lamented, even from the bench, and at the bar, that the construction which the law inforces in certain cases of Wills has been supposed, and sometimes acknowledged, to be directly opposite to the real intent of the maker of the Will ; owing to the legal construction of the words in which persons sometimes, unnecessarily, choose to express that intention. The propriety, h&wever, of abiding by rules laid down on the mature consideration of ages, has overbalanced the reluctance which must have arisen in the minds of the Judges, in innumerable decisions. The piibHc good and safety required the sacrifice of private interest, and these decisions must serve as beacons to warn all persons against settling matters of moment, without legal advice and assistance but unfortunately this is not always' at hand, nor indeed in the power of every one ; and oftentimes in those instances where it is of the greatest importance, the time unavoidably taken up in procuring it puts an end to the capacity of profiting by it. JUDGE BLACKSTONE, in the introduction to his excellent Commentaries on the Laws of England, inforcing PREFACE. Vll info .ng the necessity of a competent knowledge of law to every person, recommends some ac- quaintance with the law of Wills to physicians and apothecaries, to enable them to afford assist- ance to their patients in this instance, as well as in their professional capacity. The utility of this knowledge must, indeed, forcibly strike those gentlemen ; and if in country villages the clergy would turn their thoughts a little to this matter, it might be no small step towards preparing the mind of the sick, and putting them into a situation the better to attend to those offices, which are more peculiarly within the province of the Divine to enforce and assist in. This was the opinion cf our ancestors, with whom it was a general rule to call in the clergyman of the parish to assist in making the Will ; which was then deemed a solemn and almost indispensable act, even by those who had but little to dispose of. Repeated in* stances of this occur in the old registries of Wills, where the name of the curate continually appears as a witness ; and by whose exhortation chiefly we may suppose they were in general made ; from the almost universal custom of pious bequests for the benefit of the soul of the deceased. If this were a superstition, it must be allowed that it was, as to this point at least, a beneficial one ; and it would be well if other motives, as strong, would at this day produce the same effects. IT X PREFACE. year, it is highly probable that innumerable law- suits and disputes would be prevented. IN the two concluding chapters, and in the Appendix, particularly No. IX. directions are given for the conduct of Executors and Adminis- trators ; to render the discharge of their duty safe and pleasant in proving and performing the Will, and paying the debts and legacies of the Testator ; and in distributing the estates of those who die without Will, according to the rules of law. THE Author was ever sufficiently aware of the defects which must inevitably arise from a first attempt of this nature ; he ventures to call it a first attempt, since whatever had previously appeared on this subject was addressed to the perusal and consideration, and suited, chiefly to the compre- hension of lawyers only ; which is the reason why much excellent knowledge lies dead and unnoticed by the many who wish to have advice conveyed to them in a way suited to common capacities. For these reasons particular care has been taken in this book to avoid the appearance of formality or the UNNECESSARY use of law terms ; but no diligence has been spared to render the directions given strictly legal ; that though not extended beyond the daily occurrences of the middling state of life, they may serve as a faithful guide, as far as those extend. The forms suiting those common oc- casions PREFACE. XI casions may, it is trusted, be depended on ; and the practical instructions given, through the whole, are intended to prevent any mistakes in the appli- cation. THE work has met with so much success and indulgence from the public, that, though capable of numerous improvements in the eye of a lawyer, it is now again published, with some additions, in that form and manner which has been found so convenient to the general class of readers, for whose perusal it was, from the first, exclusively intended. THE utility of it has been evinced by its great circulation. The Author, now engaged in more laborious pursuits, while he is perhaps too partial to this first effort of his pen, is yet desirous of obliterating it, in the minds of the Profession, by productions worthy their attention and applause j the present, he is conscious, must ever have been beneath their notice. Hall Stair Case, Inner Tcmpk, 1301. Xll PREFACE. IT has been thought useful to subjoin an ex- planation or definition of such law-terms as are immediately connected with the subject j and which inevitably recur, with some frequency, in the course of the following pages. Testator, The person who makes the Will. Intestate, A person who dies without a Will. Intestacy, The dying without a Will. Real Estate, or Realty, Freehold Lands, or Houses, &c. Personal Estate, or Personalty, Money, Leases for Years, and .all other property not freehold ; in which, for some particular purposes of Wills, are included Copy- holds. Legatee Devisee, The person to whom a legacy or devise in money or land is given by Will. Legacy Devise, A sum of money or estate given by Will. Legacy is generally used in cases of money : Devise in cases of land. Heir at Law, The person entitled to the real estate of the deceased, in case there is no Will. Next PREFACE. Xlll Xe.tt of Kitty The person or persons entitled to the personal estate, in such case. Executor, The person named by a Testator, and intrusted by him with the execution of his Will. Executrix, A woman made Executor. Administrator, -The person to whom the distri- bution of the personal estate of the de- ceased is committed, by the Ecclesiastical Court, when there is no Executor. Administratrix, rA. Female Administrator. Probate, The copy of a Will on stamps, and proved in the Ecclesiastical Court. Administration, or Letters of Administration, The instrument by which the Ecclesiastical Court gives authority to the Administra- tor to act. Assets, The estate and effects of the Testator, or Intestate, in the hands or power of an Heir, Executor, or Administrator; liable to pay debts and legacies. Descent, The rule and manner by which real estates come to the Heir at Law. Distribution, The rule and manner by w-hich personal estate is divided amongst the Next of Kin. Fee-Simple An estate to one and his heirs forever. Fee-Tail, or Estate-Tail,- An estate given to one for life, and his children after him. Half-blood^ XIV PREFACE. Half-blood> Children by the same fath.er, but different mother or on the contrary. Feme Covert, A married woman. Feme Sole, An unmarried woma'n. Nuncupative Will, -A Will made by word of mouth. Residue, The remainder of the estate and effects, after payment of debts and legacies. Residuary Legatee, The person to whom such residue is given by Will. Personal Representatives of the deceased, Execu- tors or Administrators ; as the case may happen. CONTENTS. CONTENTS. CHAP. I. HAT a Will is; what a Codicil z>; Rule as to the Execution and Repub- lication of them l to 15 CHAP. II. Who may make Wills, and who are* by Law prevented from doing so - 16 >28 CHAP. III. What may or may not be disposed of by Willy Lands, Leases, Personal Es- tate, Xc. - - r - 29 40 CHAP. IV. Of the Disposal of Lands by Will; Descrip^ tion of Freehold Lands ; Rules as to the devisi?tg and settling them 41 54 CHAP. v. Rules as to executory Devises of Land; and as to contingent Remainders - 55 65 CHAP. XVI CONTENTS. CHAP. VI. Of the Revocation of Wills; Of the Dis- posal of the Lands and Goods of such as die without Will ; Rules as to such Disposal, shewing who are a Maji's Heirs-at-Law and Next-of-Kin ; Cus- toms of London and York 66 9 i CHAP. VII. Qf Executor & and Administrators ; shewing what they are, and the Distinction between them 92 104 CHAP. VIII. f)f the Duty of Executors and Adminis- trators, in proving the Will, collecting the Effects, paying Debts and Legacies, and disposing of the Residue; icith Rules for their Conduct in so doing 105 126 And see Appendix No. IX. APPENDIX, Containing Forms of Wills, Codicil, Re- publication of a Will, with Notes and Observations, Stamps and Duties on Legacies, Receipt for Legacies, We. and Table of the Expence of obtaining Probate and Administration - 127 to the End. ( xvfii ) AMOUNT OF THE STAMP-DUTY ON PROBATES OF WILLS, OR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION. Above the value of 20/. and under 100/ Ol. 10s. Otf. Of ihe value'of 100 and under 200 <7 200 . 300 300 450 5 s .' 450 600 . .11 600 800 . . .15 800 1,000 . .22 .1,000 1 ,500 . . . . .30 1,500 . 2,000 . .40 2,000 3,500 3,500 5,000 ....50 60 5,000 7 500 7,500 10 000 . . . . . .75 00 10,000 12,500.... . . 110 12.500 15,000.... ..135 15,000 17,500. .. . . 16'0 17,500 20,000. . . . . . 185 20,000 . 25,000 . . . 210 25,000 30,000 . . . . 260 30,000 35,000 . . . . 310 35,000 40,000 40,000. . . . 45,000. . . .. 360 . . 410 45,000 50,000 50 000 ()0,000 . . . . 460 . . 550 60,000 70,000 . . . . 650 70,000 80,000 . . . . 750 so ooo 90 ooo . . 850 .90,000 100.000 125000 150,000 175,0.iO 200 000 230,0!.0 300,000 350,000 400,000 500,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 175.000 200,000 250,: 00 300,000. . .. 350,000 400,000 500,000 or upwards . . 950 1,200 1,400 1,600 2.000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 -',,000 6,000 Probates, &c. of seamen, marines, or soldiers are exempted. FAMILIAR EXPLANATION OF THE LAW OF WILLS, Sfc. CHAPTER I. WHAT A WILL OR TESTAMENT IS. 5 I. The Difference between them Distinction between Written^ and Verbal or Nuncupative Wills. a. Rules as to Nuncupative IVills. 3. ft 'hat a Codicil is. 5 4. If more Wllh or Codicils than one; and of contradictory and double Legacies. 5 . Rules as to the Execution of Wills t and who are proper or improper to be IVltnesses. 6. Of the Republic at ion of Wills. 1 . -L H E short and plain definition of a Will or Testament is, that it is " the legal declaration of a man's intention of what he zcills to be performed after his death ;" a Will or Testament being of no force till after the death of the Testator or person making it. A Will and a Testament, strictly speaking, are not words of the same meaning : a Will is properly limited to land, and a Testament only to personal estate ; and the latter requires executors, who are named, to take care and see it performed. So the B word word devise seems most properly applicable to the disposition of lands by Will : and bequest or legacy to that of personal estate ; but in a course of time the words have come to be applied indif- ferently to a disposition of lands or goods, which are frequently and continually distributed and devised at the same time by the same Will. Wills .by which lands are disposed of are regulated by several acts of parliament made for the purpose, and are a con- veyance unknown to the old common law, which permitted a man only to dispose of his goods or per- sonal property. Upon the notion that a device of land by will ?> merely a species of conveyance, is founded the following distinction between such devises and dispositions of personal estate ; that a devise of a man's goods and personal property will operate upon all such personal estate as the maker of the Will dies possessed of, at whatever distance of time he may die after making the Will : but a devise of real estate will only operate on such estates as were his at the time of executing and publishing his WilL Lands, therefore, purchased after making the Will, cannot pass under any devise in that Will, unless the Will shall have been legally and formally re-published subsequent to the purchase or contract, and which re-publication is considered in law as making a new Will. These Wills and Testaments are divided into two sorts ; first, written j and, secondly, verbal, or made by word of mouth ; which latter the law calls Nun- cupative. Written Wills, whereby land and real estate, as well as personal property, are disposed of, are the subject of the following pages. The verbal* or nuncupative Wills, being in general very much out of use, shall be treated of in a very few 'lines at present, and which will contain all the knowledge now necessary on the subject. 2. A NUN- 2. A NUNCUPATIVE WILL, then, or one made (as abovementioned) by word of mouth, extends only to the personal property of the Testator, and is his intention, declared in his last hours, before a sufficient number of witnesses, and afterwards reduced to writing. As these verbal Wills (which were formerly more in use than at present, when the art of writing is become almost universal) are liable to great impo- sitions, and may occasion many perjuries, an act of parliament (29 Cha. 2. c. 3. commonly called the Statute of Frauds) enacts, 1st, That no written Will shall be revoked or altered by a subsequent nuncupative one, except the same (the nuncupative Will) be, in the life time of the Testator, put in writing, and read over to him and approved ; and unless the same be proved to have been so done by the oaths of three witnesses at the least, who must be such as are admissible upon trials at common law ; that is, against whose credit or competency no objection can be made. But where a man by Will in writing devised the residue of his personal estate to his wife, and she dying, he afterwards by a nuncupative Codicil bequeathed to another tf all that he had given to his wife ; " this was resolved to be good : for by the death of the wife, in the Testator's life time, the devise of the residue, made by the Will, was totally void: and the nuncupative Codicil was no altera- tion of the former. Will, but a new Will for the residue. 2dly, That no Nuncupative Will shall be good, (where the estate thereby bequeathed shall exceed the value of 301.) which is not proved by the oaths of three witnesses at the least, who were present at the making of it; nor unless it be proved that the Testator, at the time of pronouncing the same, did bid the persons present, or some of them, bear B 2 witness witness that such was his Will, or to that effect ; nor unless such nuncupative Will were made in the time of the last sickness of the deceased, and in the house of his habitation or dwelling, or where he hath been resident for the space of ten days or more before the making of suchWill; except where such person was surprized, or taken sick, being from his own house, and died before he returned. 3dly, That after six months passed after thy speaking of the pretended testamentary words, no testimony shall be received to prove any nuncupa- tive Will, except the said testimony, or the sub- stance thereof, were committed to writing within six days after making the said Will. 4thly, That no letters testamentary or probate of any nuncupative Will, shall pass the seal of any court till fourteen days at least after the death of the Testator ; nor shall any nuncupative Will be at any time received and proved, unless process have first issued to call in the widow and next of kindred to the deceased, that they may contest the same if they please. Soldiers and sailors in actual service may dispose of their moveables, wages, and personal estate, as they might before this act. The Legislature has, by the above restrictions, provided against any frauds in setting up nuncu- pative Wills, by so numerous a train of requisites, that the thing itself is fallen into disuse ; and is hardly ever heard of but in the only instance where favour ought to be shewn to it, when a person is surprized by sudden and violent sickness. The words by which the devise is made must be spoken with an intent to bequeath, not any loose, idle discourse in his illness ; for the sick man must require the by-standcrs to bear witness of such his intention : the Will must be made at home, among his family or friends, unless by unavoidable accident, to prevent impositions from strangers ; it must be in his last sickness ; for if he recovers, he may alter his disposition, and has time to make a writtenWill. It must not -be proved at too long a distance from the Testator's death, lest the words should escape the memory of the witnesses (but which is permitted to be remedied by their writing down within six days what they heard the Testator say) ; nor yet too hastily, and without notice, lest the family of the Testator should be put to inconvenience or sur- prized. The law also takes notice of a particular gift, In the nature of a Will, made by any one in contem- plation of immediate death, which is called donatio causa mortis (a gift in prospect of death). This is where a man being ill, and expecting to die, gives and delivers something to another, to be his in case the giver dies; but if he lives, he is to have it again. In every such gift there must be a delivery made by the giver himself, or some person by his order, in his last sickness, while he is yet alive ; for the gift will not be good if the delivery is made after his death. This delivery, however, may be made either to the person himself for whom the gift is intended, or to some other for his use, which will be equally effectual, provided it is made in the life time of the party giving. 3. A CODICIL is a supplement to a Will, or an addition made by the person making the Will, annexed to, and to be taken as part of the Will itself, being for its explanation or alteration ; to add something to, or to take something from, the former dispositions ; or to make some alteration in the quantity of the legacies, or the regulations con- tained in the Will. This Codicil may also be either written or verbal, under the same restrictions as above mentioned with respect to Wills. B 3 Whenever ( 6 ) Whenever a Codicil is added to a Will or Testa- ment, and the Testator declares that the Will shall be in force, in such case, if the Will happens to be void for want of the forms required by law in the execution, or otherwise, yet it shall be good as a Codicil, and shall be observed by the administrator. And though executors cannot regularlybe appointed in a Codicil, yet they may be substituted in the room of others named in the Will, and the Codicil is still good. If Codicils are regularly executed and witnessed, they may be proved as Wills ; and so if they are found written by the Testator himself, they ought to be taken as part of the Will, as to the personal estate, and proved in common form by witnesses, to be the hand writing of the person making the Codicil, and by giving an account when, where, and how the same was found. 4. IF two Wills are found, and it does not appear which was the former or latter, both are void - } but if two Codicils are found, and it cannot be known which was first or last, and one and the same thing is given to one person in one Codicil, and to another person in another Codicil, the Codi- cils are not void, but the persons therein named ought to divide the thing betwixt them. But if the dates appear to the Wills or Codicils, the latter Will is always to prevail, and revoke the former ; as also the latter Codicil, as far only as it is contradic- tory to the foimer; but as far as the Codicils are not contradictory, they are allowed to be both in force. For though J make a last Will and Testament irrevocable, or unalterable, in the strongest words, yet I am at liberty to revoke or alter it, because my own act or words connot alter the disposition of law, so as to make that irrevocable which in its own nature is revocable. If in the same Will there are two clauses or devises totally repugnant and contra- dictory dictory to each other, it has been held that the latter clause or devise only should take effect, on the same principle as respects prior and subsequent Wills : yet where an estate is given to two different persons by different clauses of a Will, the courts will be inclined to construe the devise so that the devisees shall take the estate as joint tenants, or tenants in common, according to the words of the several devises. Where two legacies are given to the same person by the same Will, or by Will and Codicil, the rule is as follows : that by the devise of the same sum to a person by a second clause in a Will as had before been given him by a former clause in the same Will, he shall only take one of the legacies, and not both. But where a legacy is given to a person by a Codicil as well as by a Will, whether the legacy given by the Codicil be more or less than, or equal to, the legacy given by the Will, the legatee shall take both ; and if the executor con- tests the payment, it is incumbent on him to shew evidence of the Testator's intention to the contrary. 5. WITH regard to the execution of Wills, several regulations have been made by the law, in order to guard against any frauds in the disposition of land and real estate, that having been always considered of the greatest consequence. As to such Wills as dispose of goods and personal pro perty only, if the Will is written in the person's own hand who makes it, though it has neither his name nor seal to it, and though there are no witnesses to it, the law has determined it to be good, if suffi- cient proof can be obtained of the hand writing. And even if it is in another person's hand writing, though not signed by the Testator, it will be good, if proof can be produced that it was made accord- ing to his instructions, and approved of by him. But as many mistakes and errors, not to say misfor- B 4 tunes, ( 8 ) tunes, must often arise from so irregular a method of proceeding, it is the safer and more prudent way for a person, at the time he executes his Will, though it be only of personal estate, to call in two witnesses, who- may see him sign and seal it, and to whom he may declare it to be his last Will, and desire them to witness it ; by this means leaving less to the power of the Ecclesiastical Courts, who always require two witnesses to the hand writing of the Testator to be produced at the time of proving the Will, if an attestation by two witnesses does not appear on the face of the Will itself. As to the disposition of land by Will, it is expressly provided by the act of parliament before- mentioned (29 Car'. 2. c. 3.) that all devises of lands and tenements shall not only be in writing > but shall also be signed by the party so devising the same, or by some other person in his presence, and by his express direction, and shall be witnessed and subscribed in the presence of the person devising, by three or four credible witnesses; or else the devise will be entirely void, and the land will descend to the heir at law. A Will made beyond sea of lands in England, must be attested by three witnesses, under this act of parliament. In the construction of the above act of parliament it has also been adjudged, that the name of the person making the Will,, written nith his oicv hand, at the beginning of his Will, as " I John Mills do make this my last Will and Testament," is a suffi- cient signing, without any name at the bottom. But this seems doubtful, unless the whole Will.be written by the Testator himself: and the safe and proper way is to sign the name not only at the bottom or end of the Will, but, as is usual and regular, at the bottom of each page or sheet of paper, if the Will contains more than one ; and the witnesses to the\Vill, seeing the Testator sign all the sheets, ( 9 ) sheets, and put his seal (though this is not absolutely necessary in law) as well as his name to the last sheet, must write their names under the attestation in the last sheet only ; as in the several forms in the Appendix. It has also been determined, that though the wit- nesses must all see the Testator sign theWill, or at least acknowledge the signing, yet they may do it at different times ; but they must all subscribe their names as witnesses in his presence, lest by any possibility they should make a mistake ; and that a Will is good, though none of the witnesses saw the Testator actually sign it, if he owns it before them to be his hand writing. And it is remarkable that the act of Car. 2 does not say the Testator shall sign his Will in the presence of the three witnesses, but requires these three things; first, that the Will should be in writing ; secondly, that it should be signed by the person making the same ; and thirdly, that it should be subscribed by three witnesses, in his presence. But it is not at all requifite that the witnesses should be acquainted with the contents of the Will, provided they are able, when called on, to identify the writing ; i. e. to say that the paper then shewed them is the same they saw the Testator sign. The law, in order to avoid setting aside Wills on mere niceties, has also settled, that though the act of parliament has required that the witnesses to the Will shall witness it in the Testator's presence, (in order to prevent obtruding another Will in the place of the true one) yet it is enough that the Testator might see the witnesses ; it is not necessary that he should see them signing ; for otherwise, if a man should but turn his back, or look off, it might make the Will void. And in a case where the Testa- tor desired the witnesses to go into another room, seven yards distant, to witness the Will - 3 in which room. '(10) room there was a window broken, through which the Testator might see them ; it was by the court adjudged to be a witnessing in his presence. So where the Testator's carriage was drawn opposite the windows of an attorney's office, in which the witnesses attested the Will, this was determined to be clearly in the Testator's presence. But if a Will rs executed at one time, and at another time after- wards the witnesses put their names to it/ the Testator being then insensible, this will not be a good Will, as it cannot be said to be witnessed in his presence, if he is unconscious of what is passing. It is a determined point, that a Will devising copyhold land, witnessed by one or two witnesses, or even without any witness at all, is sufficient to declare the uses of a surrender of such copyhold lands made to the use of his Will ; and the reason is, because the party to whom the land is given becomes entitled to it by means of the surrender, and not by the Will. It is necessary also to be careful who are made witnesses to the Will. Every difficulty on this sub- ject will be avoided by calling in three indifferent persons, (if there is any devise of lands in the Will, otherwise, if the whole Will respects only personal estate, two will be sufficient) who have no legacy given them by the Will or Codicil which they are required to witness the execution of, and not being creditors to the person making the Will. Formerly the Judges were extremely strict in regard to the credibility, or rather to the competency, of the witnesses; for they would not allow any legatee, nor by consequence a creditor, where the legacies and debts were charged on the real estate, to be a competent witness to the devise, as being too deeply concerned in interest not to wish the esta- blishment of the Will j for, if it were established, he he gained a security for his legacy or debt from the real estate, whereas otherwise he had no claim but on the personal effects. This determination however alarmed many purchasers and creditors, and threat- ened to shake most of the titles inthekingdom, which depended on devises by Will. For, if the Will was witnessed by a servant to whom wages were due, by the apothecary or attorney whose very attend- ance made them creditors, or by the minister of the parish who had any demand for tithes or ecclesias- tical dues, (and these are the persons most likely to be present in the Testator's last illness) and if in such case the Testator had charged his real estate with the payment of his debts, the whole Will, and every disposition therein, so far as related to real property, were held to be utterly void. This occa- sioned the act of parliament 25 Geo. 2. c. 6. which restored both the competency and the credit of such Legatees, by declaring void all legacies (and in this are included devises of lands and other interests) given to witnesses, and thereby removing all possi- bility of their interest affecting their testimony. The same statute likewise established the compe- tency of Creditors, by directing the testimony of all such 'creditors to be admitted, but leaving their credit (like that of all other witnesses) to be consi- dered, on a view of all the circumstances, by the court and jury before whom such Will shall be contested. And at length the courts have gone so far as directly to hold the testimony of three wit- nesses, who were creditors, to be sufficiently credible, though the land were charged with the payment of debts. 6. THE REPUBLIC ATION of Wills has already been alluded to, and it may be right here to say a few words concerning it. A Will a as to the dispo- sition sition of land, and in some other circumstances, takes effect, or is hindered from doing so, according to its date ; it may therefore be necessary sometimes, on certain occasions, as after mentioned, to renew it, as it were, or in fact to make a new Will. And if the Testator is exactly of the same mind ? as to the method of the disposal of his property, and circum- stances only require that the Will should bear date at any particular time, it will be sufficient to call in three proper witnesses, (agreeably to the foregoing directions) and before them declare the signature to be his hand writing, and use the same forms as in the original execution. The three witnesses must then sign their names to such new Will or repub- lication, mentioning the date thereof; as in the Appendix, Number III. It is necessary therefore in this place to inform the reader what amounts to a new publication, and what are the effects of it. A new publication of a Will is in truth, as has been already said, making it a new Will ; so that after such publication it has the force and operation of a Will just made at the time of such publication. Therefore if a man by his Will devises '' all his lands," and after making the Will purchases other lands, and then new pub- lishes his Will, this new publication has made it a new Will, and consequently by the devise of all his lands the newly purchased lands shall pass ; for there is no necessity to make any alteration in this case in the Will, the words being sufficient, upon the new publication, to convey all the lands he had at the time of such publication. So if a man by his Will devises alt his lands to certain uses ; and after- wards purchases copyhold lands, and surrenders them to the uses declared or to be declared, (or to the uses declared only) by his last Will ; this has the effect of a republication of his Will, as to such after- ( 13 ) after-purchased copyhold lands, and they shall pass' thereby : Or if a Testator, after making such a devise, purchases freehold lands, and then makes a Codicil duely executed to pass real estate ; though no notice is taken of the after-purchased lands, yet if the Codicil is annexed to or confirms the. Will,, or (as it seems) has a reference to it, this will amount to a republication of the Will, and the after- purchased lands will pass under the general devise. And, so inclined are the courts to effectuate the intent of a Testator, where it can be done con- sistently with the rules of law, such republication jnay be effected by any deed (sufficiently executed) referring to the Will. The rule, as to the new publication of a Will, should be understood with the following restriction, viz. that the words of the Will at the time of the nen" publication are such as are proper to convey the lands, and also sufficiently to denote the person to whom they are devised ; for if there is any change with respect to the person who is to take the lands by the Will between the time of the first making the Will and the new publication of it, in such case the new publication will not alter the intention of the Will as originally made, nor change the import of the words made use of, so as to make the person named in the Will take in a different man- ner than was intended at the time of such original making the same. If therefore I devise land to John and his heirs, and John dies in my life time, \et a new publication after the death of John will not make his heir take by the Will; for though the original devise was to John and his heirs, and from thence it appears to be my intention that his heirs should have the land; yet because the heirs were named in the Will to take by descent, as heirs only, and not as the persons designed to take the land ( i*; land immediately, the devise to them was rendered void by the death of John in my life time, and the new publication of the Will could not make it good ; the publication making no alteration in the words of the Will, and having no other effect than this, that if the words in the Will are proper to con- vey and describe the person to take, and the land or thing to be taken, it makes that Will, though of never so long a date, to be as perfectly new as if but then made. If a man by his Will devises land, and afterwards sells it to another, and re-purchases it, and then republishes his Will, the land so sold and re-pur- chased shall pass as if it had never been sold ; for the republication made it a new Will, and the words of themselves were sufficient to convey the land, without any addition. New publication of a Will is always favoured in equity; and with respect to personal estate, very ilender evidence will serve, though it is not safe to trust to it. As if a man says, * my Will in the hands of Robert shall stand j ' this will amount to a good republication. But in the case of real estate, the republication must be as formal as the original execution. A Republication of a Will being duely made will supply a defect for want of capacity in the Testator to make a Will, as well as any inability for want of a subject matter whereon the Will may attach. Therefore if one having, when under the age of twenty-one, made a Will of land, duely executed, but which is void by reason of his infancy, execute it after he comes of age, with pro- per requifites of witnesses, &c. this will render such Will valid. It may be proper to mention that no stamp duty whatever is imposed on Wills, till after the death ( li ) death of the Testator; wlien the probate or letter* of administration are charged with certain duties, in proportion to the value of the deceased's property. But a Will may be, and in practice always is, written and executed by the Testator on unstamped parchment or paper. CHAP. CHAP. II. WHO MAY MAKE WILLS, AND WHO ARE BY LAW PREVENTED FROM SO DOING. f I. Aliens. a. Infants Idiots Childish Persons Mad People, or Lunatics- Persons of mean understanding Drunken Persons Persons Deaft Dumb, and Blind Rules and Precautions as to the Hills of blind and illiterate Persons. $ 3. Married Women Exceptions Persons under Fear from Threats, fcfr. Ecclesiastical Court the Judge of Deceit in (fills of per- sonal Estate. 4. traitors Felons Felones de se % or self-murderers Outlaws Excommunicated Persons. R- EGULARLY every person lias lull power and liberty to make a Will and Testament, who is not under some special prohibition by our law, or by custom ; which prohibitions are principally upon three accounts. First, for want of sufficient discre- tion in the person making the Will. Secondly, for want of sufficient liberty and free-will. And thirdly, on account of their criminal conduct. It may not be amiss, perhaps, first to mention a case which does not strictly come under either of these heads, unless on some occasions it might be supposed proper to be referred to the third; an Alien (that is, one born out of the King's dominions, and whose father was not a British subject) while living under the English government, may obtain money, goods, and personal property, and may make make a Will, and dispose of such property as be pleases; contrary to the ancient Law of France, where the King, at the death of an alien, was entitled to all he was worth in that kingdom : a. Law repealed under the reign of the late unfor- tunate Louis XVI. A distinction is made between alien friends and alien enemies, meaning the sub- jects of such States as are at war with ours, or in peace with them ; but in case of an alien, the sub- ject of a State at war with England, if he lives here and trades, and is not guilty of any unfriendly act, he is permitted to dispose of his goods and money as freely as any subject ; and this under the idea that he has the King's licence for staying in the kingdom, and is therefore in some degree entitled to the protection and privilege of a subject. But an alien (friend or enemy) .not being capable of acquiring any right in land for his own benefit, can never, therefore, have any real estate to dispose of. It seems undisputed however that an alien may be a devisee even of lands, whatever the further effect of his taking such lands may be. As to the case of a foreigner having money in the stocks, or other personal property in the kingdom; if he has what is in law termed his domicil in a foreign country, that is, if he is resident there, c.r only occasionally absent therefrom, and is subject to its laws, the disposition of such property, either under his Will, or in case he dies without a Will, shall be regulated by the laws of the country of which he is a subject; but if he is domiciled in England, then by the English laws. This has been a very contested point in the case of several natives of Scotland, as the succession to property is regu- lated by different laws in Scotland and England ; but the principle above stated seems now pretty well established; though in all probability the cir- cumstances of a neighbouring country, and the C number ( 18 ) . number of refugees from thence to this kingdom, may produce some further discussion on this very nice point. What shall or shall not be considered as the domicily or habitation of the party as a sub- ject to the State, is a question of fact to be governed by the peculiar circumstances of every case. 2. IN the first class of prohibitions, want of sufficient discretion, are included, Infants,- or persons under age : and it is par- ticularly provided by the act of 34 and 35 //. 8. c. 5. sect. 14. that no person under the age of twenty- one years shall make a Will or Testament of any manors, lands, tenements, or other hereditament ; and a Will made by any such Infant will not (generally speaking) be taken to be good or effec- tual in law, but will be absolutely void ; for until that time, > by the common law of this kingdom, they are accounted infants, and incapable of governing themselves and their affairs. Yet the law allows a male infant, of the age of fourteen years and upwards, and a female of twelve years or upwards, to make a Will respecting only goods, money, and other personal estate ; but as the ecclesiastical court is the judge of every Testa- tor's capacity, and decides on disputes respecting the validity of Wills relating to personal estates, the discretion of the person making the Will mav be disputed there, and his capacity of devising, let him be of what age he will. No custom can be good to enable any persons to make a Will under the respective ages ot fourteen and twelve above- mentioned; though by custom in particular places infants may devise lands, after that age, and before twenty-one. An Idiot., or natural fool, is one who, notwith- standing he may be of lawful age to make a Will, yet has so little sense as to be unable to number to twenty, 4 twenty, or to tell what age he is of, or to answer any common questions, by which means it may plainly appear that he has not reason to discern what is to his advantage or disadvantage, and who, from his want of natural parts, is incapable of being informed or instructed by any other ; and such an idiot cannot, at any time, make a Will orTestament, nor dispose either of his lands or goods. Upon the same principle persons who are grown childish, either through old age or any infirmity or distemper, are, during the continuance of such incapacity., disabled from making a Will. Mad folks, or Lunatics, during the time of their madness, cannot make a Will or Testament, nor dispose of any thing thereby, and that for the most forcible of all reasons, their utter incapacity of knowing what they are doing ; arid it is a principle of law r , that in making of Wills, integrity, sound- ness, and perfectness of mind, are absolutely requi- site, the health of the body merely not being regarded. Yet if such mad persons have lucid (that is, clear or calm) intervals of reason, then during the time of such intervals, if they are fully possessed of a sound and disposing memory and understand- ing, they may make their Wills, which will be good in law. If a person of a sound mind make his Will, this shall not be revoked or affected by his subsequent infirmity. Every person, however, is presumed to be of perfect mind and memory, unless the contrary is proved ; and therefore if any one attempts to call in question or overthrow the Will, on account of any supposed madness or want of memory, in the Testator, he must prove such impediment to have existed previous to the date of the Will ; but peo- ple of mean understanding and capacities, neither of the wise sort nor of the foolish, but indifferent betwixt both, even though they rather incline to C 2 the i 20 ) the foolish sort, (says a quaint writer on this subjetl) arc not hindered from making their Wills. The law will not scrutinize into the depth of a man's capa- city, particularly after his death, if he was able to conduct himself reasonably in the common course of life, as it might be opening a wide door to support pretensions of fraud or imposition on the Testator. One overcome with drink is equally incapable of using his reason, during his drunkenness, as a mad- man ; and therefore, if he makes his Will at that time, it is void in law. Persons born Blind, Deaf, andDumby are incapable of making a Will, as they want the common inlets of understanding, and are incapable of having any desire of bequeathing or obtaining any knowledge with respect to property, or the disposal of it; and are in as helpless and ignorant a situation as idiots themselves ; and even those who are only deaf and dumb by nature, cannot make a Will, unless it very manifestly appears, by strong and convincing proofs, that such persons understand what a Will means, and they have a desire to make a Will ; for if they are possessed of such understanding, and desire, then they may, by signs and tokens, declare their intentions. A blind person may make a nuncupative or verbal Will, by declaring his intentions before a sufficient number of witnesses, and he may also mak a Will in writing, provided the Will be read to him before witnesses, and in their presence acknowledged by him for his last Will ; but if a writing should be delivered to a blind man, and he, not hearing the same read, acknowledged the same for his Will, this would not be sufficient ; for it might happen, that if he had heard the same read, he would not have acknowledged it for his Will. The best and most sure way, therefore, in such a case, is, that the Will be read over to the Testator, and approved by him, ( 21 ) him, in the presence of all the subscribing wit- nesses ; and although the law of England does not expressly require this regulation, in respect to the Will of blind persons, yet a court of justice s* ill demand satisfactory proof of some kind that the identical Will was read over to him, though it was not in the presence of the witnesses ; it is there- fore good policy to let all the subscribing witnesses be present at the reading over such a Will, as in case of any dispute, which may V>e more likely in such extraordinary circumstances, they will be most capable of affording compleat satisfaction to the minds of a judge and jury, The above precautions, necessarv for authenti- cating a blind man's Will, seem in like uegree requisite in the case of a person who cannot read - t for though the law, in other cases, may presume that the person who executes a Will knows and approves the contents of it, yet that presumption will cease where, through defect of education, he cannot read, or is by sickness incapacitated to read the Will at that time, 3, UNDER the second head of persons disabled from making a Will, are those who have not suft> cient liberty and free will , and here shall first be mentioned married women. A married Woman (in law called a feme covert, which means a woman covered or protected by her husband) is restrained and prevented from devising any land or real estate whatsoever ; being particularly excepted out of the act of 34 and 35 //. 8. c. 5. enabling other persons to dispose of their lands and tenements by Will ; and it is a general rule that she cannot make any Will, even of goods or personal estate, without the licence or consent of her husband ; because by the law, as C 3 soon ( 22 ) soon as a man and woman are married, all the goods and personal estate, of what nature soever, which the wife had at the time of- the'marriage, or may acquire after, belong to the husband, by force of the marriage, which empowers him to make such part of them his own as are not absolutely vested in him immediately by marriage ; and therefore it would be an inconsistency in the law to give her power of defeating that rule, by bequeathing those goods and chattels to another. If a woman makes a Will, and afterwards mar- ries, and dies during the life of her husband, yet being at the time of her death incapable by law of devising, because her husband is then living, the Will is void ; for it is necessary, in order to make her Will of force in law, that she had ability to make a Will ; not only at the time of making thereof, when the Will received its being, but also at the time of her death, at which time only any Will can receive its strength and confirmation. If a wife survives her husband, a Will made during the marriage is not good ; because she is, during such time, by law restrained from making any Will : but if a Will is made during the marriage, and she survives her husband, and approves and confirms the Will after his death, in this case it will be good, by reason of her new consent or new decla- ration of her Will ; for then it is, as it were, a new Will, as has been before mentioned on another occasion. If a woman makes her Will, and after- wards marries and survives her husband, and dies a widow, leaving such Will made before her mar- riage ; it has been held that the Will was revived and in force: but later determinations seem to have settled that though she was able in law to make a Will, both at the time of the execution of it and at her death, yet such Will shall not be good ( 23 ) good or valid in law, without a republication, it having been once absolutely revoked, and entirely made void by the marriage. Although a married woman is, generally speak- ing, so entirely under the power of her husband, that she cannot make what in propriety of speech is called a Will, yet she may, with the consent of her husband, make what is termed an Appointment, and which, like a Will, does not take effect till her death, and may be altered or revoked during her life ; and the usual way in such cases is for the intended husband to enter into marriage articles, or a bond before marriage, in a sufficient penalty con- ditioned, to permit his wife to make a Will, and to dispose of money or legacies to a certain value, and to pay what she shall appoint, not exceeding such value ; and in that case, if after the marriage, and during it, she makes any writing, purporting to be her Will, and disposes of. legacies to the value agreed on, though in strictness of law she cannot make a Will, without her husband's positive assent to the specific Will, but only something like a Will, yet this shall be good as an Appointment, and the husband is bound by his bond, agreement, or cove^ nant, to allow the execution of it. And this Will, or Appointment, must be proved in the Spiritual Court. To the above general rules there are also some few other exceptions. The Queen-Consort is exempted from these restrictions, and she may dispose of her goods and personal estate by Will, without the consent of her lord. If a married woman is executrix to some other person, and in that right has goods and chattels, these do not become the property of the husband by marriage., because she has them not for her own C 4 use, ( 24 ) use, but as representing the person of another, and therefore, in this case, she may, for the conti- nuation of the executorfhip only, and for no other purpose, make an executor, and consequently a Will, without the consent of her husband; but ihe cannot either in her life time, or by her Will, dis- pose of the goods which she is thus possessed of in the right of another, any otherwise than as by law she is required to do as executrix. If a married woman has any pin-money, or sepa- rate maintenance, she may by Will dispose of any savings made by her out of the same, without the controul of her husband. Another remarkable exception is in favour of a married woman, whose husband is banished for his life by act of parliament ; for she may make a Will, and act in every thing as if she was unmarried, or as if the husband was dead. Where personal property is given to a married woman for her sole and separate use, she may dis-r pose of it by Will without the aflent of her husband. Where lands are conveyed to trustees, a married woman may have the power of appointing the dis- position of them after her death; which appoint- ment must be executed like the Will of an unmar-: ried woman, and will be subject'to the same rules of construction. It has also been determined bv the House of Lords, that the appointment of a married woman is effectual against the heir at law, though such appointment depends only upon an agreement of her husband before marriage, with- out any conveyance of the estate to trustees. As to debts due to the wife, and bonds or other personal securities for money which were her's before marriage, though the husband may make them his own when he pleases, yet the wife mav, by his consent, make a Will and devise them, and this ( 25 } this is properly a Will in law, and ought to be proved in the spiritual court. To this head of want of free-will may be also referred the following directions : A Will will be set aside which is made by a person in consequence of any threats made use of to him, whereby he is induced, through tear of any injury, to make such a Will as he would not other- wise have wished to do. On this point, no certain rule can be laid down, but it is left to the discre- tion of the court to determine upon the particular circumstances of the case, whether or no such persons could be supposed to have a free will in the disposing of their estates, and the judge will, on such an occasion, not only consider the quality of the threats, but also the persons as well threat- ening as threatened ; as in the person threat- ening, his power and disposition ; in the person threatened, the sex, age, courage, pusillanimity ; and the like. But if after making the Will, 'when there is no cause to fear,- the maker of it ratifies and confirms it, it will be good in law. If a man makes a Will in his sickness, at the over-importunity of his wife, contrary to his own wishes and desires, and merely that he may be quiet, this is a Will made by restraint, and shall not be good. The spiritual or ecclesiastical court has jurisdic- tion of fraud or deception relating to a Will of personal estate, and can examine the parties by allegation concerning such fraud and deceit ; as if the Will was falsely read to the Testator, when it is not his Will. But in the case of a real estate, a Will cannot be set aside even by a court of equity, for , fraud or imposition, but must be tried at law on the question, whether the Testa tor did or did not in fact devise, the fraud or imposition in this case being a matter proper for a jury to enquire into. * THE (26) $ 4. THE third kind of disability arises from the criminal conduct of the parties. A Traitor lawfully convicted of high treason, by verdict, confession, outlawry, or otherwise; besides the loss of his life, shall forfeit to the king all his goods and chattels, and all such lands and freehold property as he shall have at the time of his committing such treason, or at any time after ; and so consequently is unable to dispose of any thing by Will: and traitors are not only deprived of the privilege of making any kind of last Will, from the time of their being convicted and found guilty, but any Will made before, does, by reason of such conviction, become void, in respect both of goods and lands: But if any person convicted of treason obtain the king's pardon, he is thereby restored to his former estate, and may make his Will as if he had not been convicted ; or if he had made any before his conviction and condemnation, such Will, by reason of the pardon, recovers its former force and effect. A Felon, lawfully convicted, cannot make any Will, or other disposition of any goods or lands, because the law has disposed therepf already ; all his goods being forfeited to the king, who is also to hold his freehold estate for a year and a day after his death, when it is forfeited to the chief lord of the fee ; so that it cannot be in the power of the felon to devise it. But in this case also, a pardon restores him to his former estate and capacity of making a Will. If a person indicted for felom/, on his arraign- ment would not answer or put himself on his trial, but stood mute, he was by the common law to receive the terrible punishment called the peine forte et dure, that is, to be pressed to death ; frut now, by a statute made in the present king's reign, the standing mute in cases QI felony, as well as ( 27 ) as formerly in cases of high treason, and in offences less than felony, us petty larceny, and all misde- meanors, is equal to conviction, and the person indicted shall be found guilty j which in the case of high treason has the same effect, as to the for- feiture of lands, and in felony of his goods, and to every other purpose, as if he had put himself on his trial, and been found guilty by the strongest evidence. , If a man wilfully kills himself, in which case he is in law termed a felo de se, his Will, if he made any, is void, both as to the appointment of an executor, and also with respect to any legacy or bequest of goods, for they are forfeited by the very act and manner of his death ; but any devise of land made by him is good, as that is not subjected to any forfeiture. An outlawed person is not only out of the king's protection and out of the aid of the law, but also all his goods and chattels are forfeited to the king, by means of the outlawry, although it should only be for debt; and even though the action in which he is outlawed is not just, nevertheless his goods and chattels are forfeited, by reason of his contempt in not appearing , and therefore he that is outlawed cannot make his Will of his goods so forfeited. But a man outlawed for debt, or in any other per- sonal action, may in some cases make executors ; for he may have debts upon contract, which are not forfeited to the king, and those executors may have a writ of error to reverse his outlawry. It is the better opinion, that an excommunicated person may make a Will, though some disputes have heretofore arisen as to the effect, of w r hat is called the greater and lesser excommunication ; but these niceties are nearly put an end to, by the unusualncss of the case ever happening at this time. With ( 28 ) With respect, however, to the Wills of traitors, felons, outlaws, &c. though they are void as far as concerns the king, or the lord who is entitled to the forfeiture of their lands or goods, yet the Will is of force against the testator and his representatives, and all other persons whatever ; so that if the king or the lord pardons the forfeiture, the Will is suffered to take effect. Formerly Papists were under several disabilities, both as to the purchasing lands and taking them by descent or devise ; but those are now done away, and Papists rendered capable of purchasing and devising lands, and taking them by descent, pur- chase, and devise, on taking the oath prescribed to them by the act of 18th Geo. 3- c. 60. which is generally complied with, to the great credit both of the Protestants and Papists ; the latter of whom were also relieved from many other disabilities, by the act of the 31st Geo, 3, c. 32, CHAP. CHAP. III. WHAT MAY BE DISPOSED OF BY WILL. i. Customs restraining the Devise of persona! Estate abolished. 2. Lands Disposition of Lands to charitable Uses, bow restrained De-vises in fraud of Creditors. 3. Rents, Tithes, &c. Estates for another's Life Mortgages Advoiusons. 4. Lands agreed for and not conveyed, 5. Leases Debts, and Securities for Money. 6. What the Testator has not. 7. Joint Tenants, what they are, and how hindered from making a Will. 8 . Corn growing. 9. Executors and Administrators. 10. Wife's Property. 11. Land acquired after the Will made. 1. JLJLNCIENTLY there were in different parts of the kingdom, and particularly in Wales, and in the province of York and in London, several cus- toms, the remains of the old common law, which prevented persons from disposing of more than one third part of their goods and personal property: which restraint continued till very modern times, when, in, order to favour the power of bequeathing, and to reduce the whole kingdom to the same standard, three acts of parliament have been pro- vided (one 4 and 5 William and Mary, c. 2. explained by 2 and 3 of Anne, c. 5, for the Pro- vince ( 30 ) vince of York; another 7 and 8 IV ill. 3. c. 38. for Wales; and a third 11 Gco. 1. c. 18. 17. for London;} whereby all persons within those districts, and liable to those customs, are enabled to dispose of all their money and other personal estate by Will; and the claims of the widows, children, and other relations, to the contrary, under pretence of the custom, are totally barred. Thu-s is the old common law, restraining devises, and the customs in those places which were the relicts of it, entirely abolished throughout all the kingdom of England ; and a man may give the whole of his goods by Will, as freely as he formerly could his third part, in disposing of which, he was bound by the custom of many places to remember his lord and the church, by leaving them his two best chattels, and afterwards he was left at his own liberty to bequeath the remainder as he pleased : These customs, however, as far as they respect the distribution of a person's goods who dies without a Will, still remain in force ; as shall be taken more particular notice of hereafter. 2. IT seems sufficiently clear that before the Conquest Lands were deviseable by Will. But upon the introduction of the military tenures, the re- straint of devising lands took place : and some have questioned whether this restraint was not founded upon truer principles of policy, than the power now allowed to be exercised of wantonly disin- heriting the heir by Will, and transferring the estate, through the dotage or caprice of the ances- tor, from those of his blood to utter strangers. However this be, we know that by the common law of England, immediately subsequent to the Con- quest, no estate greater tjian for a term of years could be disposed of by Will : except only in Ke?it, and. some ancient burghs, and a few particular manors where the Saxon immunities by special indulgence ( 31 ) indulgence subsisted : and though the restraint on alienations by deed vanished very early, that on Wills continued for some centuries after, from an apprehension of infirmity and imposition on the Testator in his last moments, which made such dis- positions suspicious. At length, after various devices had been made use of to elude this restric- tion of the common law, an act of parliament was passed, viz. 32 Hen. 8. c. 1. (explained by 34 and 35 //. 8. c. 5.) which enacted that all persons who had the fee simple, or absolute property, in lands or 'tenements (except married women, infants, idiots, and lunatics) might by Will in writing devise certain portions of such lands and tenements ; and by means of another act, 12 Car. 2. c. 25. (which took away the reason of the former restric- tions, by altering the tenures of estates) every per- son is now enabled to dispose of the whole of his freehold lands,, in which he has the fee simple or absolute property, by Will, to any other persons, but not to companies or corporations. Copyhold lands pass by a particular mode of surrender to the use of the Will, according to the different custom of the several manors of which they are holden. Corporations were excepted in these statutes, to prevent the extension of gifts in mortmain, or the too great accumulation of land in hands where it lies dead, and not subject to change possessors ; but by construction of a subsequent act of parlia- ment, 43 Eliz. c. 4. it was held that a devise to a corporation for a charitable use was valid, as ope- rating in the nature of an appointment rather than a bequest. To prevent however any imposition in respect to the disposal of lands to charitable uses, which might arise in a Testator's sickness, and in some measure from just political principles, it is now provided by the act of 9 Oca. 2. c. 36. that no lands or tenements whatsoever, nor any money, or securities ( 32 ) securities for money, or other personal estate what- ever, directed to be laid out in the purchase of land, shall be given to or settled upon any persons or corporations in trust, or for the benefit of, or charged with, any charitable uses, unless such gift is made by deed indented, executed in the presence of two witnesses, twelve months at least before the death of the giver of such land or money ; except it consists of stocks in the public funds, to be laid out in land, in which case the stock must be trans- ferred six months before the giver's death: The deed must be inrolled, within six months after the execution, in the high court of Chancery, and the gift must be made to take effect imme- diately, for the benerit of the charity intended, and must be without the power of revocation. By this act all other gifts made to these purposes are declared void ; therefore no devise can be made by any last Will or Testament, of land, or money to be laM out in land, for charitable uses, except to the two universities of Oxford and Cambridge, or to any ot the colleges there; or to the colleges or schools of Eton, Winchester, and Westminster, for the support of the scholars only at those schools, which are expressly excepted out of the provi- sions of the act ; which does not extend to Scot- land. It was to prevent frauds and perjuries, and to remedy other inconveniencies which arose from the acts enabling persons to devise land, that the act 29 Charles 2. c. 3. as to the execution of Wills, and act 25 Geo. 2. c. 6. as to witnesses, stated in 5 of chap. 1. were passed. But one inconvenience was still found to attend this mode of conveying pro- perty by devise ; as creditors by bond, &c. were by this means defrauded of their securities, not having the same remedy against the devisee of their debtor, as they would have had against the heir to whom the ( 33 ) the estate would otherwise have descended. To obviate this evil the act of 3 and 4 Will, and Mary, c. 14. provides that all Wills and Testaments, limi- tations, dispositions, and appointments, by persons having power to dispose by Will, shall (as against such creditors only) be deemed' to be fraudulent and void : and that such creditors may maintain their actions jointly against both the heir and devisee. A devise to raise a portion for younger children, according to an agreement before mar- riage, and a devise for payment of debts, are ex- ceptions in the act of parliament. 3. More immediately as to what things are dwiseable- -In general it may be stated that every thing in which a man has the absolute property may now be devised by his Will : disputes at pre- sent arising mostly on the words of the Will, and not on the right to bequeath. Thus rents, tythes, manors, franchises, and annuities may be devised by virtue of the words " lands, tenements, and hereditaments," in the statutes of Henry 8. So may reversions, and vested remainders, expectant after the estate tail : as to which, see more at large in chapter V. Estates held in trust may also be devised by the persons for whose benefit they are held. Where a man holds land for the term of another person's life, he is said in law to have an estate iwur autre vie ; and if he dies before the person for whose life he holds the same, he may (by 29 Car. 2. c. 3. before mentioned) devise the same by Will in writing, executed in the presence of three witnesses, and subscribed by them in his presence; such an estate being considered as a freehold. If any one has money owing to him on mortgage, he may devise this money to be paid when it becomes due. D A person ( 34 ) A person may devise by his Will the right of presenting to the next avoidance, or the inheritance of an advowson of a benefice 5* and if such devise is made by an incumbent or parson of any church to whom the inheritance of the advowson of that church belongs, it is good, though he is the incum- bent or parson of the church when he dies ; for though the Will has no effect but by the death of the Testator, yet it has a beginning in his life time ; and the disposition and bequest will be good also, if he appoints by his Will who shall be presented to the church by the executors, or that one executor shall present the other, or that his executors shall grant the advowson to any particular person. This case being distinguished and excepted from the general rule as to advowsons, which are by law forbidden to be disposed of while there is no incumbent, and the church is empty, in order to restrain the cor- rupt and wicked practice of Simony. 4. IF a man has agreed to purchase an estate, and the buyer and seller enter into articles for the purchase, and the buyer dies, having by his Will devised the land so agreed to be purchased, before any deed to convey the same is made to him, yet the land will, by force of equity, go to whomever he may have devised it by his Will, he having a right so to do, and to recover the land ; the 1 seller only standing as trustee for him, and whom he should appoint, till a regular conveyance be exe- ecuted. * In the former case, where only the next avoidance is disposed of, t"jx> witnesses would be sufficient to the Will, that being part of his personal estate; but if he disposes of the iv/io/e inheritance of th dvowson, there must be tlrrec witnesses, the inheritance being part of his real estate, and subject to the same rules as land. So also a donative may be devifed. 4 5. A LEASE ( 35 ) 5. A LEASE for any number of years, deter minable upon a life or lives, that is, if such or such persons live so long, or a lease for 500 or 1000 years, or any other term absolute, may be given and disposed of by Will, and are part of a man's personal estate. Where one by his last Will bequeaths any debt due to him, or any bond or other personal security for money belonging to him, the legacy is good and effectual in law, and may be recovered by him to whom it is given in two methods. First, either if the Testator makes him executor of that particular debt or security bequeathed him, then he may, as executor thereof, commence an action in his own name, and recover the same to his own use, against him from whom it was due ; or if he is not made executor of that debt or security, he may summon the executor, appointed in the Will, in the Ecclesi- astical Court, and compel him either to sue for that debt, and upon recovery and payment thereof, to pay it over to him ; or else to make a letter of attor- ney to him for the recovery of it, in the executor's name, to his own use. 6. SOME of our old writers on the Law of Wills have very carefully stated that if a person devises to another a horse or a yoke of oxen, the legacy is good, though the Testator may have no horse or oxen of his own, either at the time of his death or making his Will ; and in these kind of legacies the rule is, that if the words of the devise are directed to the person to whom the legacy is given, as, " I will that John Mills shall have a horse," the choice of the horse belongs to John Mills , but if the words are directed to the executor, as, " I will that my executor give to John Mills a horse," the choice belongs to the executor ; and they add that D 2 both t 36 ) both parties should be reasonable in their choice, that the legatee may not choose a horse of too great value, or the executor one of too little. An estate depending upon a contingency may be devised ; as where John leaves an estate to Thomas and his issue, and in case Thomas dies without issue then to Robert : Robert may devise this con- tingent interest to whom he pleases, if he happens to die before the contingency takes place j or before it is prevented from doing so. See hereafter, chapter V. 7. If two persons obtain an estate by pur- chase, and hold by one and the same title, they are called joint-tenants, and possess the land jointly, each of them, as the law expresses it, by the half and the whole 3 that is, there is no distinction between them, each being equally entitled to the estate, and during their joint lives to half the profits. When one of such joint-tenants dies, he who outlives the other shall have the whole of the land ; and if one of them, during his life time, devises his share in the land, and dies, this devise will not be good, and the person to whom the joint-tenant has devised his share takes nothing, because the devise does not take effect till after the death of the joint-tenant, and then the survi- vor takes the whole land by a prior title, that is to say, the deed of purchase. And although the joint-tenancy is severed before the Testator's death, (as it may be by process in Equity) yet a Will made before such severance will have no effect unless there be a republication of it after the severance has actually taken place. By the custom of the city of London, a joint- tenant may devise what belongs to him, and no other act is necessary to give the person to whom the ( 51 ) the land is devised, the same title as he himself had ; but he shall take the land by the devise in any manner the joint-tenant may direct. In other cases, if one joint-tenant makes a Will, and devises his share in the lands, if he dies before the other joint-tenant it will not be good, but if he outlives the other joint-tenant the devise may by a republi- cation be made good for the whole estate, because he has the whole by survivorship. 8. BY an act of 20 //. 3,'c. 2. widows may bequeath the crop of their ground, as well of their dowers (of which lands they are called tenants in dower) as of their other lands and tenements; and by 28 //. 8. c. 11. if the parson or incumbent of a living, before his death, has caused any of his glebe lands to be manured and sown 'at his own expence, with any corn or grain, he may by his Will devise such corn, and all the profit of it, growing on the glebe land so manured and sown : and if a man is possessed of land for the term of his life only, and the land after his death descends to his heir, yet he may devise the corn growing on the land at the time of his death, away from the heir, to some other person ; although he has it not in his pov/er to devise the land whereon it grows. Where a man has lands in right of his wife, and sows them with corn, he may devise the corn grow- ing on the lands at his death, the devise is good, and the wife, though entitled to the land, shall not have the corn. If a man thus possessed of lands in right of his wife, lets them to another who sows the ground, and afterwards the wife dies, the corn not being ripe, yet in this case the person to whom the lands were let is entitled to the corn, and may devise it notwithstanding his estate and interest in the land is determined. D 3 Whenever ( 38 ) Whenever a man marries a woman possessed of freehold lands, if he ever has a child by her, male or female, born alive, though it does not live to grow up, and he survives his wife, he is by the law of England entitled to the profits of those lands during his life, and is called Tenant by the curtesy. And if while he is thus tenant by the curtesy he sows these lands, he may devise the corn growing on them at the time of his death, as well as the corn growing on other lands, though he cannot dispose of the lands at all, by Will or otherwise. In cases where a man's real estate is so settled that he cannot devise it by Will, he cannot devise any thing which ought to descend to the heir, or which is affixed and belongs to the freehold, as the trees growing on the land, or the windows, doors, and wainscots of a house ; and if there are any valuable moveables, furniture, or pictures, in a house, that have by custom gone with the house from heir to heir, he is also prevented from devis^ ing these moveables; which obtain in law the name of heir-looms, as belonging to the heir. 9. AN executor or administrator cannot devise those goods which he has as executor or admini- strator, and which belong to the person to whom he is executor or administrator ; but the same must be applied in payment of that person's debts, and distributed in a due course of law. The executor or administrator having these goods only for such particular purposes, and not to his own absolute use. Nor can a husband devise any effects which his wife has as executrix, for the like reason. 10. ALTHOUGH, as has been already stated, the personal estate of the wife becomes the pro- perty of the husband immediately on marriage, as he is thereby enabled to make all debts due to her, and ( 39 ) and bonds for money given her before marriage, his own, yet unless he recovers such debts during the marriage, and renews the bonds, and takes them in his own name, he has not such an absolute intereft in them as to be able to devise them by his Will, but they will, after his death, again become the property of the wife ; or if he survives his wife, not having taken these necessary steps to make this part of her personal estate his own, he may take out administration to her, and will by that means become absolutely entitled to and possessed of them. But if a woman's fortune, or any part of it, consisted in bonds given her before marriage, and the husband on the marriage makes a settle- ment on her in consideration of such fortune ; not- withftanding the bonds are not renewed during the marriage, yet the husband will be entitled to them, being in this case considered as a purchaser for a valuable consideration j he may therefore de- vise them by his Will, and they shall go to his ex- ecutor, even though the wife should survive him. 11. A MAN cannot by his Will devise lands which he shall acquire after making his Will : the Will only operating on such lands as he is pos- sessed of at the time of publishing it. And though a man does by express words in his Will give to another all the lands which he shall have at the time of his death, yet this devise will be good only as to such lands as he had at the time of making the Will ; and any lands, purchased afterwards, will not pass by it, but go to the heir at law, unless the Will is republished. But where a man is entitled to an eftate in reverfion, expectant on the determination of another person's life, who holds the lands for his life, or in tail, he may by his Will dispose of this ; and if the tenant in tail or for life dies during the life time of the Teftator, such lands which ( 4-0 ) which will then come to his possession will pass without any republication of his Will ; the rever- sion at the time of the making the devise being a certain present intereft, though it was to take place in future. As to money and personal estate, the rule is different, these being continually fluctuating and uncertain. And for a further explanation of the reasons of these rules, see before, c. I. p. 2, and 6. also Appendix., No. III. CHAP. CHAP. IV. OF THE DISPOSAL OF LANDS BY WILL. i. Lands Freehold, Leafebohl, and CofyboldDifllnSion between them. a. Freeholds^ their federal Kinds. 3. Divifton of this and the following Chapter on the deviftng and fettling Land. 4. Wills conjirued favour ably ^ and Rules thereon, 5. What Words give a Fee-Simple, or the whole EJlate and Property in Land And herein of Devifes on Trujl to pay Debts , &c. 6. What Words give an Eflate-fail and for Life. 1. AT has been already, in the former intro- ductory chapters, explained by what acts of par- liament persons are enabled to make their Wills of lands, and the forms necessary thereto. This and the following chapter shall be dedicated to the ' consideration of the different modes of devising and settling lands ; and for that purpose a few ex- planations may be in the first place necessary for the more clear comprehension of what follows. By the word Lands, in its most extensive sense, people in general understand all manner of estates whatever, whether freehold, leasehold, or copy- hold ; but the law distinguishes materially between them. Lands in which a man has a freehold are considered as real estate, while leasehold lands make a part of his personal estate, and they, as well ( 42 ) well as copyhold lands, of which more shall be said hereafter, may be disposed of by the same kind of Will as his money and goods. And hence arises the necessity of understanding what is meant by those terms of law, so continually and unavoid- ably made use of throughout this work. 2. FREEHOLD lands, then, are either, first, such as a man is possessed of the whole property in, and which eftate is in law called a fee-fimple, being the higheft and beft eftate a man can possibly gain, as he may dispose of it to whom he pleases, cither in his life time, or by his Will, under the re- gulations before mentioned. Secondly, such lands as are intailedj that is to say, which after the death of the parent are intended to descend to his children 5 and this is called an estate in feet-tail ; but to which lands the father can in his life time ac- quire an absolute right, as much as if he had ori- ginally the feersimple in them, by certain modes of conveyance, and thus procure a title to dispose of them by Will, in prejudice to his heirs. Thirdly, Such lands as are held for the term of another per- son's life, which also are considered as freehold, and which in the last chapter [3./>. 33.] were mentioned to be devisable by Will, if the person for whose life they are held (who is called the cestui que vie] survives the person possessing the lands un4er that title. Fourthly, Such as a man has an estate in for his own life, and over these he can have no power by his Will, (except as before mentioned in the case of corn growing on them,) the land being then to go to some other person : But such an estate is a freehold, and is by the law of England considered as of an higher nature than a leasehold interest for any term of years, how long soever, even though it may be for 500 or 10OO years. There are also some other estates for life, ( 43 ) as tenant by the curtesy, and tenant in dower, al- ready defined, [pa. 37, 38.] but not at present ne- cessary to be further explained ; as, like the last mentioned, they cease on the death of the pos- sessor, and cannot be devised by Will. 3. HAVING thus settled the distinction be- tween freehold and other lands, we will now pro- ceed to deliver some plain information to regulate the disposal of them. And for this purpose it is to be enquired, first, what rules are to be observed in the construction of Wills and Teftaments. Se- condly, what words in a Will give a fee-simple, -or the entire property in a freehold estate, to the de- visee ; and what the law implies from certain parti- cular forms of bequests. Thirdly, What words in a Will bestow an estate-tail on the devisee ; that is, an estate to him and his children, but which is liable to be barred or prevented by his act ; and what words give an estate for life. .Fourthly, How far the law allows a man to dispose of his lands by Will to several persons, one after another, in case of their dyin^ without heirs ; and of devifing to fathers, for their lives only, and after their deaths to their children, without creating an estate-tail. And here, as we shall be led into the most difficult part of the Law of Wills, as to lands, some endeavour will be made to explain the nature of Executory Devises, being a bequest or limitation of a future interest, not to take place immediately on the death of the Testator, but to be executed only at a time and under circumstances appointed by the Will. A few words will be said on the learning of Contingent Remainders, or, as they may be called, chance estates ; that is, such as may or may not take effect, according as certain events do or do not happen. Fifthly, Of the giving a person by by Will land for a term of years, or other uncer- tain interest. Sixthly, How far these rules, as to the disposition of freehold estates, apply to lease- hold and copyhold estates. I. 4. IN the construction of Wills it is an in- variable rule, that a devise must be most favourably expounded, to pursue if possible the intent of the Testator, who, for want of advice or learning, may have omitted the legal and proper phrases : There- fore many times the law dispenses with the want of those words in Wills which are absolutely requisite in all other instruments. And thus the fee-simple of, or entire property in, land may be conveyed by Will, without using those words of inheritance, and an estate-tail may be given without the words of procreation, which are necessary to create those estates by deed ; the intent of the devisor supplying that defect. By a Will also an estate may pass by mere implication, without any express words to direct its course. As where one devises lands to his heir at law, after the death of his wife : Here, though no estate is given to the wife in express terms, yet she shall have an estate for life by implication ; for the intent of the Testator is clearly to postpone the heir till her death, and if she does not take it no- body else can : But if an estate is given to a stranger after the wife's death, the devise does not raise an implication in favour of the wife, the estate descending to the heir during her life. In all cases where implications are allowed they must be such as are necessary, or at least highly probable, and not merely possible. Under a devise to a wife for life, provided she remained a widow, but in case she married a se- cond husband then to J. S. when he should attain his ( 45 ) his age of 23 years, the wife was held to hare an absolute estate till J. S. was 23, though she married before that time. Where a title depends upon the words of a Will, any dispute relative to it is as properly determinable in Chancery, by a court of equity, as before a judge and jury , there being no distinction between the rules of law and equity herein ; for the Will is construed in each court with equal favour and be- nignity, and expounded on its own particular cir- cumstances, connected with and regulated by the general rules of law and equity. The intention of the Testator is said by a great lawyer to be the pole star to guide the judges in the exposition of Wills ; but though it is allowed to be thus considered, in order to explain the words of the Will, yet such intention must be col- lected from the Will itself, and not from any re- ports or evidence concerning it : the courts having been at all times careful of admitting verbal testi- mony of any kind in respect to a Will ; as it might be the means of much perjury and contrariety of evidence, which the legislature have now taken great pains to avoid in regard to Wills. And little credit being due to any thing that may have fallen from a man himself, either before or after making his Will ; it often appearing that insinuations may be thrown out purposely to mislead those who are interested in the disposal of his property. Notwithstanding that wills are thus generally favoured, yet where a person endeavours to make a settlement of his estate against the reason and policy of the common law, the judges are bound to reject it. And where a man by his Will makes no other disposition of his land than the law itself would have done, had he not made any Will, there such a Will is useless, and will be invalid. As if I give land to my son and his heirs, or to John Mills and ( 46 ) and his heirs, and my son or John Mills is my heir at law, this is a void devise, and the person to whom the land is given shall not take the land under the Will, but by descent, being the better title, as if no Will had been made; for a descent strengthens a title, taking away the entry of such as may poffibly have right to the estate : But he who has an estate by devise is said by law to be in by purchase; a worse title than descent. If I give my land to my wife for life, and after her death to my son, who is my heir at law, or if I give it to my executors for a term of years, in order to pay my debts, and after the expiration of that term to my son ; in both cases he shall not take the land by this devise, but by descent; as without such direction in the Will the land would have come to him after the death of my wife, or payment of my debts. But if I by my Will create an estate in my heir different from what he would have taken by law, there the devise shall be good, the quality of the estate being altered, and it being indeed not the same estate as would have descended to him. As if I, being possessed of lands in fee-simple, give my son an estate-tail in those lands, and after his death without issue devise it to another, here he shall take by the Will, which confines his interest, and not by descent, by which he would have been entitled to the fee-simple ; the intention of the Testator being always to prevail : and here it is manifest that the son shall not not have such an estate as the law would have given him. Those devises are also void and rejected where the words of the Will are so general and uncertain that no meaning can be collected from them. And therefore where a man by Will gives " all to his mother," these general words will not pass lands to his mother; for since the heir at law .has a plain and uncontrovertQd title, it would be severe and unreasonable ( 47 ) unreasonable to set him aside, unless the intention of the Testator is evident, from the Will ; for that would be to set up and prefer a dark, and at best but a doubtful title, to a clear and certain one. All devises that tend to introduce perpetuities, of which more shall be said hereafter, are also void. If a man devises land to the heir of John Wil- liams, John being alive at the time of making the devise, and at the death of the Testator, the heir of John shall take nothing by the devise ; because during the life of John he can have no heir ; and the devise being immediate to John's heir, if such heir cannot take the land at the death of the Tes- tator, he shall never have it. So a devise of real estate to the heir of an alien is void ; because an alien, according to the policy of the English law, can have no heir, either to inherit or to take by purchase. II. 5. WHAT words give a fee-simple, or the whole estate and property in land ; and herein of charging debts on land, and devises on trust to pay debts, &c. It would be endless to multiply individual cases as to the construction of Wills when the words have been held to give an eftate in fee, in tail, or for life. The general rule of construction, that governs all uncertain cases, of which innumerable instances occur in the law reports, may be stated shortly as follows : If there be no words added to the devise to limit the estate, or to render it per- petual, so as to shew the intention of the Testator to convey the inheritance of the land to the devisee, he can only take an estate for life ; but wherever there are words and expressions, either general or particular, or any clauses in a Will which the courts can lay hold of, to enlarge the estate of a devisee., ( 48 ) devisee, they will do so, to effectuate the intention of the Testator; but if that intention is doubtful, the rule of law must take place. This rule must be kept in mind in perusing the several examples which follow : If a man devises lands to another for ever, or in fee-simple, or to him and his assigns for ever, or to him and his ; in all these cases the fee-simple or whole estate passes by the Will : for it is evidently the Testator's intention, that the gift should continue beyond the life of the person devised to. So if one devises lands to another, to give, fell, or do ichat he pleases u-ith them., these words, by the intent of the giver, convey the fee-simple ; as does also a devise to one and his blood ; because the blood runs through every branch of a family. A devise also to a man and his successors carries a fee ; for by the word successors is intended heirs, the heir succeeding to the father. John devises his land to Thomas, on condition that Thomas shall pay several sums of money in gross, (that is, all at once) and not saying out of the profits of the land ; or shall forgive a debt due from the Testator to him ; Thomas in this case shall have a fee-simple in the land, though all the sums of money together which he is to pay do not amount to a year's rent of the land ; for the cK shall be intended for his benefit : and if he was to have the land for his life only, he might die before he could receive the amount of the legacies out of the land, and consequently be a loser : for where there is a sum thus to be paid all at once and im- mediately, there the person to whom the land is devised shall have the whole of it, though the sum is not the value of the land, or near it. As if the land was 100 acres, and Thomas was to pay only 101. to the executors, he has a fee-simple : for the quantity of the sum thus to be paid in gross is not material. ( 49 ) material. But if a devise were to Thomas, pay- ing so much, or such sums of money, out of ike profits of the lands, there Thomas would take but an estate for his life ; for though he takes the land charged with payment of 'the money, yet he is to pay no faster than he receives, and so he can be no loser. If I devise my land to Thomas, in consideration that he will forgive and release to my executors 1001. which I owe him, Thomas has a fee-simple in the land, upon his releasing his demand on me : for the devise shall be intended for his benefit j and if he had no more than an estate for life, it might be determined before he could receive the 1001, out of the land, which would be an injustice as well as a hardship. If one devises 1001. in legacies to different per- sons, and directs them to be paid within a year, out of land worth 101. a year, and then devises the land to another, he to whom it is devised shall have the land-in fee-simple : for though the devise is not made to him paying 1001. yet since he must take the land by the Will, subject to the charge of the legacies, it is necessary he should have a fee- simple, in order to gain any thing by the devise. So if I by my Will give my wife 101. a year, to be paid out of my estate of the value of 201. a year, by my executor, and afterwards give " all and singular my lands to him, to be freely possessed and en- joyed," my executor shall have the lands in fee- simple. If I give " my whole estate" or " all my estate, real and personal" to my wife, or any other, they paying legacies and debts, my debts being 2Ol. and my personal estate but 51. they shall have the whole of my lands, by the words " my ichole estate" or " all my estate, real and personal ; " for in common acceptance these words are extended E to ( 50 J to land. And the former rule, where a person is to pay a sum in gross, applies here, they being to pay my debts. A devise of all his estate (or estates] whatsoever, or of all his effects, real and personal, comprehends all that a man has, land, money, goods, or other property whatever: p^evic'ed, in all the above cases, that the Will is duly executed, and attested by three witnesses, so as to pass land. And where there is a surrender to the use of the Will, a copyhold estate will fall under the same construction. The reason why the word Estate or Es f *:tes has been held to give the whole fee or prope~ f in land is, that either of these words comprehend-* not only the land which a man has, but also all the interest which he has in it. If I give lands to John and Robert, and their heirs, John and Robert will be joint-tenants, and the survivor or longer liver of them shall have the lands in fee-simple. And it is the same if I give them to three or more persons ; the heirs of the person or persons first dying not being entitled to any thing, and the persons dying not being en- titled to dispose of any part by their Will, the survivor bylaw taking the whole. But if I give land to two or more persons, and their heirs, to be equally divided between them, this will make them tei.ants in common; each person's moiety or share of the estate descending to his own heirs respec- tively, and being devisable by Will, not surviving to the other. It is proper therefore in all Wills, when this latter estate is meant to be given, (and which is generally the case \\here land is given to two or more, otherwise than as trustees), to add the words " to hold as tenants in common, and not as joint-tenants," \\hich prevents a possibility of doubt taking place. [See before, page 36, 7.] Where- ( 51 ) Where a person has the fee-simple of a house, and a lease for ninety-nine years of land adjoining to it, and makes his Will, and thereby gives to his son and his assigns all his estate and interest in the house, lands, tenements, and appurtenances there- unto belonging, upon trust that he shall, out of the rents of the land thus held for a term of years, pay 2001. a year during the term ; the son shall have the fee-simple in the house which the father had in fee-simple, and the land held under the lease for ninety-nine years he shall have for the remainder of the term. If a man has lands in fee-fimple, and has also a lease for several years of other lands, and by his Will devises all his lands and tenements to any one, the fee-simple lands only pass by the Will, and not the lands held by lease for years. But if a man has only a lease of land for years, and no fee-simple lands, and devises all his lands and tenements ; in this case the lease for years passes by the Will, or otherwise the devise would be entirely void. If lands are devised to trustees for any particular purposes, without using the word heirs, yet by im- plication of law the trustees must have an estate of inheritance sufficient to support such trust : for there is no difference between a devise to a man for ever, and to a man upon trusts which may last for ever. In all cases of devises of land, in trust for par- ticular purposes, or on certain conditions, it is necessary to remark, that if the person to whom the land is devised, and who is to perform the condition, is heir at law, notice of a condition must be given to him, because he having a title by descent, need not take notice of any Will, lii.fess it is signified to him. But if he to whom the land is devised is not heir at law, he must inform himself of the estate de- E 2 vised { 52 ) vised to him, and upon what terms, and must take notice of the condition at his peril. III. 6. WHAT WORDS give an estate-tail, or for life. In deeds, the legal and necessary words to create an estate-tail are, " To John Mills, and the heirs of his body" which both in deeds and Wills give an estate-tail. But here also the rule formerly laid down will hold good; that the intention of the maker of the Will supplies the want of those words in particular cases. Though a man is not permitted by his Will to direct an inheritance to descend against the positive rules of law. If I devise land to my son, and direct if he has issue of his body lawfully begotten, that then the issue shall have the land, and that if my son has no issue, then that some other person shall have ir after my son's death ; by this devise my son shall have an estate-tail, the words in law being suf- ficient for that purpose, notwithstanding my di- recting how the land shall go in case of my son's death without issue. If I devise land to John Mills and his heirs male, the law in favour of the Will supplies the words " of his body" in this case, and will give him an estate-tail. But if John Mills has a daughter, who has issue a son, that son shall never inherit the land under this devise, on account of the word male after heirs. For this being distinguished by the name of an estate in tail male, as descending to sons only, the rule is, that any one claiming under such a Will, must convey his descent from the person to whom the land was originally given wholly by male heirs, without any interruption of females. Where land is devised by Will to John Mills and his heirs, and if he dies without issue, that then the land ( 53 ) land should go to another, this will be adjudged to be an estate tail in John Mills, and not an estate in fee. For here the extent of the general word heirs is confined to the descendants or issue of the body of John Mills ; since otherwise it would be devising the whole of the estate to two different persons ; firft to John Mills, and afterwards to the other person ; which is transgressing a rule of law, as shall be more fully explained hereafter. So where a man gives the fee-simple and inheri- tance of his land to John Mills, when he shall at- tain his age of twenty-one years, and to his child or children for ever ; but in case John Mills fhall happen to die before twenty-one without issue, then he gives the fee-simple and inheritance to another ; John Mills shall only take an estate-tail ; the generality of the words first used being re- strained by a subsequent explanation. If I devise to John Mills for life, and will that if he dies without issue the land shall go to another, this is an estate-tail in John Mills ; for it is not to go to the other person till the issue of John Mills is dead. If lands are given by Will to John Mills and his heirs for erer, and if he dies without heirs, then to his brothers or sisters, the devise to the brothers and sisters is good, and John Mills shall have but an estate-tail in the land ; as the intent of the Testator appears that heirs of his body only were meant, and not heirs in the general and most extensive signification of the word. If a devise is made to John Mills, and the heirs female of his body begotten, and afterwards John Mills has a son and daughter, and dies, the daughter shall have the land and not the son, though he is in law the moil worthy person, and heir to his father. But because the intention of the deceased was that the daughter should have it, law and conscience give the land to her. E3 Jf ( 5*) If I give lands to a man and his heirs-male for ever, this is adjudged to be an estate-tail. If one has an estate in lands to him and his heirs for another's life (being one of the freeholds before mentioned at the beginning of this chapter) this cannot be entailed by Will j because it is not strictly an estate of inheritance, being uncertain in its du- ration. It is a positive rule in the construction of Wills, in all cases where an estate is bequeathed to a man for his life, and after his death to his children, with- out any estate to any other person intervening, that such person takes an estate-tail, notwithstanding the first words give him only an estate for life. In order therefore to prevent a father from taking any thing more than an estate for life, it is necessary to devise the land to trustees after his death, in order (as the Jaw expresses it) to preserve the con- tingent remainders ; that is, in fact, to secure to the son such an estate as it is intended he shall have, independent of the father, and which it shall not be in the father's power to deprive him of : Or perhaps the best way is to devise the estate in the first instance to trustees, in trust, to receive the rents and profits during the life of the father, to be applied for his subsistence and maintenance, and then to devise it after his decease to his children. [See the form in the Appendix, No. V. 7.] As to devises of copyhold estates, see afterwards, Chap. V, 7. If I am possessed of lands in fee-simple, and by my Will devise them to John Mills, without saying to his heirs, or any thing further than to " John " Mills," he will have the lands during his life only ; for the words will give him no better estate. And if the devise is to John Mills and his assigns^ without saying for ever, he will have only an estate for life. CHAP. ( w CHAP. V. OF EXECUTORY DEVISES, AND DEVISES OF COPYHOLDS. I. A Perpetuity , iv/jat it is, and ;owin? on a man nothing more E 4 than ( 56 ) than an uncertain estate for life, and extending the dominion over property long after the death of the original possessor, who thus shews his desire of incumbering an estate of which he was in his life time absolute master, with fanciful and arbitrary restrictions ; arising in general from whim and caprice, and perhaps often from that unwillingness to part with property, so distinguishingly the mark of an avaritious mind. The law has, how- ever, made some exceptions to the general rule in favour of dispositions in last Wills and Testaments, by which a man is allowed to settle his land and property in a way which he is not permitted to do by deed ; but this indulgence is confined by cer- tain bounds of law which cannot be overleaped. Executory devises, which are a restriction or re- gulation of this power, and of which it is intended shortly to treat in this chapter, are only so far valid as they keep within the salutary prescriptions laid down for them, and in which the welfare of a future generation is considered as more than equi- valent to the wishes of the present disposer. Yet in this, as in other cases of Wills, the courts both of law and equity will make a construction in favour of the devise, in order to support the in- tention of the testator, as far as it can possibly be done, consistent with the rules of law. For the above reasons, if there is a devise of lands to John, and the heirs of his body, on condition that he shall not alien, or that if he shall go about or offer to alien the land, his estate shall cease and go to an hospital, this devise to the hospital is void, as an invention to create a perpetuity, and John shall take the estate absolutely in the first instance. 2. AN Executory Devise has already (page 43) been defined to be, A bequest or limitation of a future interest in an estate, not to take place im- mediately ( 57 ) mediately on the death of the Testator ; but to be executed only at a time and under circumstances appointed by his Will. The various sorts of these executory devises are intended to be explained and elucidated in this chapter, with the several rules to which they are subject, Contingent Remainders are certain estates, which are subject to particular rules, difficult to be under- stood or comprehended by those unacquainted with the terms and forms of law, They are here men- tioned only as in some measure forming the foun- dation of executory devises, the rules of which are partly drawn from them by analogy ; and to which there may be occasion to allude. But we shall be careful of leading the reader into subtleties which even now puzzle the bar and the bench, notwith- standing the variety of determinations which they have given rise to. If land is devised by Will to John for his life, and after his death to his son, John at the time of the making the Will not having any son, and he dies and leaves his wife with child, who after his death is delivered of a son ; such child shall take the estate under the Will, though born after the death of John, this being a good devise, and consistent with the legal rules by which Executory Devises and Con- tingent Remainders are regulated and restrained. 3. THE first sort of Executory Devises which shall be mentioned, is, where a man by his Will devises an estate in his land to another, to take place at a future time, and to arise only on the happening or not happening of some particular event ; in the mean time suffering his estate to descend to his heir at law till such event happens, as it would do if he had made no Will, and who, in case the intended event does not arise, will enjoy the estate for ever. This kind of estate, the beginning ( 58 ) beginning of which is so uncertain, and which nay in fact never take place, is not allowed to be created by deed, because the delivery of the land (which in all conveyances of it in a man's life time must be made either in fact or in law) always makes the conveyance take effect from the moment of the delivery, and not from any future period ; but as in the case of Wills, such actual or legal delivery cannot be made, the gift not taking effect till the giver's death, it is of necessity dispensed with. If, therefore, I devise, by my Will, lands to Mar}/ Mills, and her heirs, to be conveyed to her upon her day of marriage (Mary Mills at the time of the making the devise being single) this is a good executory devise of the fee-simple or whole property of the land to Mary Mills, in case she marries, and shall take effect immediately on her day of marriage, and not before, till when it de- scends to my heir ; and if she should never marry she can never have the estate, the devise being only to be executed on such event's happening to her, and therefore it is called an executory devise. To this head may be referred devises to an infant not yet born, but as the law expresses it, in ventrc sa mere, that is, in its mother's womb, and which are good, though such child is not born till after the Testator's death, as it shall take by way of executory devise, when it is born. Such devises were formerly held void, for that the infant not being born, there was no person to take by the Will ; but they are now held good, because the law supposes that the Testator did intend it to him when he should be born. By the same rule, an executory devise of an estate of inheritance to a grandson, or any other person unborn, when he shall attain the age of twenty-one years, is good, and there is no danger of creating a perpetuity. 4. By 4. BY the second kind of these executory devises, a man may give his land to several persons in succession, under certain contingencies or limi- tations, notwithstanding he at first apparently dis- poses of the whole property or fee-simple to some particular person ; and this the law calls limiting a fee upon or after a fee, which cannot be done by any other species of conveyance than a Will. One may also hereby give an estate, for life only, to one or more successively in land, and then devise the fee-simple to some other after their deaths. As for example : If I by Will give lands to John Mills > and his heirs, and direct, notwith- standing my having thus devised the fee-simple of the land to him, that if John dies before he i.s twenty-one years of age, then the land shall go to Robert, and his heirs ; this is a good executory devise in favour of Robert, who shall have the land, if John dies under twenty-one ; and though Robert happens to die before John, yet if John dies under twenty-one, the heir of Robert shall have the estate under this executory devise. 5. IN both the above kind of executory de- vises, however, the law has directed, that the contingencies on which the estates are to take effect in future, must be such as will happen, if at all, within a reasonable time after the death of the Testator ; as within the life or lives of one or more persons then living, or within a moderate term of years ; not even a Will being indulged so far as to create that perpetuity mentioned at the beginning of this chapter, though an executory devise is, in fact, a perpetuity as far as it goes. The utmost length of time ever allowed by courts of justice, after the death of the Testator, for the taking place of the event on which the estate is to vest or come in possession, is the life or lives of any person ( 60 } person or number of persons in being at the death the Testator, and twenty-one years after, and in the case of a posthumous child a few months more ; as if I give lands to such son of a married man or woman as shall first attain the age of twenty-one years, and at the time of the Will being made, or of the death of the Testator, no such son is born, yet if any son is afterwards born, he shall take the land by this executory * devise, as the utmost length of time that can pass before he comes into possession is the life of the parent, the time from the death of the father to the birth of the child, and his subsequent infancy, being twenty-one years.* So also, if I give lands, which I have in fee- simple, to John and his heirs, and direct that in case John dies without issue, in the. life of Robert, that then the land shall go to Robert and his heirs ; though this, as is before said, is a limitation of a fee upon a fee, yet because Robert can only have the estate on such a chance as must (if at all) happen in the course of a life, namely, his own, this will be held a good executory devise, by which Robert will take the estate, if he survives John y and John dies without issue. If I devise, land to John for life, and after his death to Robert, in fee-simple, and John dies in my life time, yet the estate thus created by Will to Robert is good, and he shall have the land imme- diately on my death; my intention being clear that he should have it after the death of John, r.nd the nature of the estate given Robert by the Will, not being at all altered by the death of John in my life time, V. 6. A THIRD kind of executory devise also introduced in favour of Wills, and not allowed to be * See Note (3) to No. II. in the Appendix. created ( 61 ) created by deed, is such whereby a man can dispose of a term for years, or leasehold estate, or other chattel interest, (as the law terms what is not free- hold) to several persons in succession. It has been before mentioned that an estate for life in lands is esteemed by the law of a higher nature than one for a term of even 500 or 1000 years, and from hence arose the legal maxim or rule, that any grant, devise, or disposition whatever, of such estate for years, to a man for his life, gave him the whole term. This rule is now a little dispensed with in favour of Wills only ; and a man may devise a term for years to John for his life, and after the death of John to Robert, and may thus make as many life estates, and estates in expectancy on their expiration, as he pleases : But to prevent the danger of perpe- tuities, it became a fixed and absolute rule, that though these expectant estates (technically called remainders] might be given or limited to as many persons successively as the Testator thinks proper, yet must all the persons who are designed to take those estates be in existence, during the life of him to whom the estate is first given ; for then, in fact, the person who is to take last will be only him who happens to survive the rest, and who will thus obtain possession of the whole remainder of the term unexpired ; or such future estate must be directed to take effect upon such contingency or condition only as must happen (if at all) during the life of such first devisee. As if I give a lease for vears to John for life, and after his death to Robert for his life, and after the death of Robert to Peter ; if Robert and Peter are alive at the time of John's taking the estate under the will, this is a good executory devise to them, and they shall take in turn as named in the Will. This rule has long been still further extended ; and it is- now -settled, that a term for years, or any chattel ( 62 ) chattel interest may be given by an executory devise to an unborn child of a person in existence when it attains the age of 21 ; and that the limits of executory devises of real and personal property are precisely the same. Thus if 1 devise a term of years to John for life, and after his death to Robert, his son, for his life, and then to the eldest issue male of Robert, though Robert has no iflue male at the time of my making the devise, nor at my death, yet if he has issue at the time of his own death, such issue shall take the term of years by way of executory devise ; for though this is a contingency upon a contingency, (that is, two chances instead of one) yet it must of necessity take place (if at all) immediately after the end of both the lives which were in being at the time the father (to \\ihom it is first devised) took the estate, and it is therefore held to be within the rule above laid down. If I give a lease for years, by Will, to my wife for life, and after her death to such of my children as shall be living at my death, and the survivor of them, and in case all my children die without issue, then I give the said lease to John Mills, this is a good executory devise to him, and he shall take the estate on the death of all my children without issue, and not otherwise. Though it is thus permitted to make executory devises of personal estate by Will, yet wherever the words, if applied to a freehold, would create an express estate-tail, the whole intereft in the personal estate so devised shall be in the first taker; and any gift to another after the decease of such first taker will not be suffered to take effect. VI. 7. COPYHOLD lands are such as are held by copy of court roll, at the will of the lord, ac- cording to the custom of the manor. Of these there ( 63 ) there is a great variety, and the customs of the several manors are infinitely diversified, which in all dispositions of such lands must, in the first place, be attended to ; no certain rules, therefore., can be laid down, as to devising or settling the same. Copyholders regularly cannot transfer or alien tleir estates, any otherwKe than by a surrender of the.n into the hands of the lord of the manor, who is now compellabie, on such surrender, to grant ano- ther eftate at the will of the lord, according to the custom of the manor, to him to whose use the sur- render is made, the tenant having a settled interest in the land, which his heir shall inherit, whether the lord will or not ; the descent of copyhold (like that of freehold) "state being in general governed by the rules of the common law, except in some instances where the custom of the manor is con- trary ; but copyhold lands not being in other respects similar to freehold lands, the rules respect- ing the latter will not apply any further. In certain cases the court of Chancery and other courts of equity will supply the want of such sur- render. It is said, however, to be now settled, that, unless there be a valuable consideration, these courts will not interpose for such purpose, but in favour of three description of persons only, Credi- tors, Wife, and Children ; and even in such cases they proceed subject to several restrictions. For though they will supply such surrender in favour of Creditors, if the other eftates liable to the pay- ment of debts are not sufficient, yet if there be both freehold and copyhold estates devised for the payment of debts, and the freehold be sufficient for such purpose, the court will not supply the surrender. In supplying a surrender in favour of a Wife or youngtfr Children, courts of equity respect the claims of 4 ( 64 ) of the heir at law, and therefore will not interpose if the heir would thereby be left totally unpro- vided for. But the heir, whose claim is to be thus respected, must be one for whom the Testator was under as strong a moral obligation to provide, as for the devisee. And if the supplying the sur- render would not disinherit such heir, courts of equity will supply it in favour of the wife, though she should be otherwise provided for. But it has been held, that they ought not to supply a sur- render for younger children against an elder, to make them in a better situation than the elder; though this doctrine has been contested. It has been also determined that equity will not supply the want of such surrender in favour of a grand-child, or of a bastard, who is not considered as a child ; nor in behalf of legatees 5 but where the surrender is refused, a Will of Copyhold lands may be sufficient without it. The regular way, therefore, to dispose of all such copyhold lands, is, for the tenant to surrender the same, according to the custom of the manor of whch they are held, to the use of his Will, and afterwards to make his Will in writing, declaring how he disposes of the same ; and he may by this means devise or appoint them to such uses as he pleases, consistent with the custom of the manor of which they are holden. The above rules apply only where a person has the actual legal property in a copyhold eftate j for an equitable property in copyholds may be devised by Will without surrender. Thus, where a man mortgages a copyhold estate, and the mortgagee is admitted and has the legal estate, the equity of redemption may be devised by the mortgagor, without any surrender ; for he has indeed no estate which he can surrender to the use of his Will. 8. HAVING said thus much of executory de- vises of lands, and chattel interests, it may now be necessary ( 65 ) necessary to give some short information relative to a like disposal of goods and mere personal estate. Money cannot be devised firft to one and then to another; the first person to whom it is given being entitled to it wholly, and money particularly having, as the law expresses it, no ear-mark. As for instance, if I have three daughters, and I give them 3001. to be equally divided between them, and direct that if any of them die without issue, her part shall go to the survivors, this latter devise is void, and each of the daughters shall take 1001. by the Will, without any benefit whatever of sur- vivorship ; and if one of them dies after the death of the Testator, and before the legacies are paid, her share of the money shall be paid to her execu- tor, or other personal representative. But the use of chattels personal, as household goods, moveables, &c. may be bequeathed to one for life, and after his death the property to another; as if I direct by my Will that John shall enjoy the use of my household stuff during his life, and after the death of John I give the same to Robert, this is a good devise thereof to Robert ; but if the property of the thing be bequeathed to the first of them, then it is otherwise ; for the absolute gift of such personal estate, though but for an hour, is a gift thereof for ever. It has, notwithstanding, been determined that a devise of goods to John for life, and after his decease to Robert, is a good devise to Robert, the devise for life to John being to be interpreted as to the use only of the goods; and, on application, the court of Chancery will direct an inventory of the goods to be signed by John, and deposited with a master in Chancery ; and bills have been exhibited to compel security to be given for the value ; but to which that court is now unfriendly. F CHAP, CHAP. VI. OF THE REVOCATION OF WILLS: AND OF THE DISTRIBUTION MADE, BY THE LAW, OF THE ESTATES OF SUCH AS DIE INTESTATE : THAT IS, WITHOUT A WILL. i. Introduction. a. Various Kinds of Intestacy, arising from informal Rills frills revoked Revocations, and Ademptions of Legacies, either ex- prefs or implied Instances of bet h. 3. Duplicates oflVills. 4. Revocations of Wills, by other Wills or Deeds made subsequent thereto. 5. Rules at to Descent of Lands. 6. Distribution of Personal Estate. 7. Who are a Man's next of Kin. 8. Customs of London and York. 9. Bastards Married Women. ITHERTO we have treated of such dispo- sitions as persons are enabled to make by Will, of their estates, as well real as personal. In a former chapter it has been remarked, that if a man by his Will disposes of his land only, in such a manner as the law itself would have done without any Will, such Will shall be void, and the heir shall take by descent as his better title j it will be necessary, therefore, to shew who are, by law, the heirs of every one, and thereby entitled to his land; and we shall also further proceed to explain in what ( 67 ) what manner the law distributes the personal estate of such as die without Will (legally called In- testates) j this distribution being regulated by general rules, though in some places confined by particular customs. The reader will then be in possession of all the knowledge requisite both to make his Will, and also to know when and how the law will make it for him. This we shall en- deavour to do in the clearest manner possible j and shall then proceed to the mention of the duties of Executors and Administrators, to whom in par- ticular the attentive perusal of this chapter may on many occasions be necessary. ,2. IN order to proceed clearly, and without confusion, it will be necessary to show in what cases a person is said to die Intestate, that is, without a Will, as this may happen in a variety of methods, and a person may not be always aware of his real situation in this respect. First, if the Will is informal in its execution, with respect to the disposition of land, as if it hath but two witnefles to it, or if it is not signed by the witneffes in the presence of the Testator, the law will determine the maker of it to die intestate ; such Will being in fact no Will at all. If a man by his Will disposes both of real and personal property, and such Will is attested only by two witneffcs, it will be good to dispose of his personal estate as he shall have thereby directed ; but it not being sufficient, according to the directions of the act of 29 Car. 2. c. 3. to dispose of real estate, he shall, as to that, be said to die intestate, and the land shall descend to his heir, as though there were no Will whatever. So in like manner, if a person, by a Will duly executed, and properly and legally witnessed, disposes only of part of his landed estate or personal property, making no mention of F2 the ( 68 ) the rest, and not devising the residue of this estate to any one, he is said to die intestate, as to such part both of his land and personal property as is not mentioned in the Will ; and the same shall descend or be distributed as in the case of a perfect intestacy, or dying without any Will at all. A person is also said to die intestate, if after having made his Will he revokes it, without making any other Will, and such revocation may arise from various causes both in fact and law, and is either express or implied. Express, as if he absolutely cancels the Will, by tearing off the seal and the signature, or if he destroys or burns the whole Will, or expressly declares his mind that his Will should be revoked : Implied, where the state or condition of the person devising, or of the estate or thing devised, is altered, after making the Will. The consequences of a REVOCATION of a Willy which may frequently take place, without the knowlege, and even against the consent of an uninformed Testator, render it useful to state the law on this subject somewhat at length. By the statute of frauds, 29 Car. 2. c. 3. already so often mentioned, it is enacted, That no devise of land, in writing, shall be revocable, otherwise than by another Will, or some other writing to be executed in the presence of three witnesses, or by burning, tearing, or cancelling the Will, containing such devise, by f/ic person making the same, or in his presence, or by /it's consent. But it has been determined, since as well as before this statute, that without an express revocation, if a man who has made his Will afterwards marries and has a child or children, whether such child is born before or after his death, this is a presumptive or implied revocation of his former Will which he made in his state of celibacy, as well as to his real as his personal estate ; and the above mentioned statute does 69 ) does not extend to this case, but he shall be said to die intestate, the Jaw supposing that he must mean to provide in the first place for his family, and distributing his estate for their benefit accord- ingly. This, however, being only a presumptive revocation, if it appears, by any expression, or other means, to be the intent of the Testator that his Will should continue in force, the marriage "will be no revocation oi it As in the case where a man devised an estate to a woman, whom he afterwards married, and when he died she was with child of a son, yet the Will was determined to be good, and not revoked by the marriage ; and such implied revocation may in all cases be ex- plained away by evidence. If a man by his Will devises his land, and then sells the same land, and afterwards re-purchases it, yet the Will stands revoked (as to the land) by the 'sale, and the re-purchase is no declaration of the Testator's mind to set it on foot again, without a re-publication. If a woman before marriage makes her Will, and thereby devises her land to John, and afterwards marries him, or any other, and then dies, yet neither John or the husband take any thing by his Will, the marriage "being in law a revocation of it; and a married woman not being capable, as has been before mentioned, of making a Will of lands. Where a man possessed of Stock or money in the funds devises the exact quantity he is possessed of to any one or more persons by his Will, this is a specific legacy ; and if the Testator afterwards, before his death, sells any part of the stock so devised, such sale shall operate as a revocation (or as the law terms it an ademption or taking away) of so much of the legacy as shall be sold ; and the legatee or legatees shall only be entitled to so much stock as actually remains at the time of the Tes- F 3 tator's ( 70 ) tator's death ; and if there is no stock at all re? maining, the whole legacy is gone, and the legatees cannot come on the other part of the estate for a satisfaction. If the Testator, however, after sale of part of the stock, purchases other stock, this shall restore the legatees to the amount of such pur- chase. Thus, if a man, having 15001. 3 per cents, bequeaths the same by his Will, and then sells 5001. and dies, the legatee shall have only the 10001. remaining ; but if before his death the Tes- tator purchases other stock, and dies, leaving the same unsold, the legatee shall have the \vhole stock, if less than 15001. or if more, to the amount of the legacy. But if one, not having any stock at all at the time of making his Will, give legacies, to consist of stock, describing the same, this shall operate not as a specific legacy, but as a direction to his executors to purchase so much stock, and pay the same to the legatee, who will then stand in the same situation as all the other general legatees. In the case of lands, where the law does not imply a revocation, it must be in writing, operating as a Will, and signed by the person making the Will, or by some writing, by which the Testator declares his intention to revoke the first Will, and signed *by three witnesses, pursuant to the statute or frauds. [See the Appendix, No. III.] A subsequent devise to another person, though he may be incapable of taking, is a revocation of a precedent devise to a person who was capable of taking, as it serves to shew the intent of the Testator to revoke the first devise, though the second cannot take effect. But one Will cannot be revoked by another Will, though the latter Will contain a clause declaring all former Wills to be revoked; unless the second Will is valid and effectual. Yet a Will may be revoked by a deed or or instrument written merely for the purpose of revocation ; if it is attested by three witnesses ; and the testator must sign it in the presence of the witnesses, which, as already noticed (page 8), is not specifically directed by the statute of frauds in the case of the execution of a Will. S. IT often happens that there is a duplicate of a Will made, and deposited in the hands of an executor, or other person. In such case, a can- celling of that part of the Will which is in the possession of the Testator is a sufficient revocation of both the parts, as well that in his own hands as the duplicate in the hands of the executor ; they being both in fact but one Will. But it is best that such cancelling should be before witnefles. And so if a Testator makes a second Will, and duly executes the same, it shall, without any thing further, revoke and make void the former Will and Duplicate. 4. WHEN a latter W r ill is the instrument by which a former is revoked, the revocation effected thereby is liable to be recalled until the death of the Testator , for although by making a second Will, the Testator intends to revoke the former, yet he may change his intention at any time before his death, (until which neither of his Wills can have operation) -, and then the latter (being a revocable instrument itself, and only affecting the former as far as it is itself efficient), being revoked is as no Will j the consequence of which is, the first Will never having been cancelled, but remaining entire, stands in like manner as if no other had been made. But if a prior Will be made, and then a subsequent one, expressly revoking the former, in such case, although the first Will be left entire, and the second Will be afterwards F 4 cancelled, ( 72 ) cancelled, yet the better opinion seems to be that the former is not thereby set up again ; and it has been determined, that where a Testator having made a new Will, actually cancelled the former Will by tearing off the name and seal, &c. and afterwards cancelled the latter Will, the former Will was not revived thereby, although a counter- part thereof was found in his possession uncan- celled and undefaced : But the party was held to die intestate, because the revocation was here an express, independent, substantive act ; by which the former Will became to all intents and purposes void and incapable of taking any effect, unless as a new Will by force of a republication. Revocations of a Will may also take place by an actual or intended alteration in the estate of the Testator. And here it is to be observed, that the principle which governs cases of such actual alte- ration is clearly distinguishable from that which governs cases of an intended alteration only : In the former cases the revocation is a consequence of law, uninfluenced by and independent of any intent in the Testator to revoke or not ; but in the latter cases the revocation is an inference from the fact, as furnishing a ground to conclude that such was the intent of the party. The following general principles will explain the nature of such revocations, and the decisions of the Courts thereon ; and the instances quoted, though few, may suffice in a work of this nature. There is no feature in our law more prominent than that of an uniform solicitude on every occasion to favour the heir, and prevent his being dis- inherited. This anxious attention to the interest of the lawful representative has introduced into the law, respecting devises of real estates, this fixed principle, namely, that as at the time of making his Will a man must be seised of the estate he devises, ( 73 ) devises, so the law requires that such estate should remain in the same plight and unaltered, to the time of the consummation of the devise by his death ; and that his original intention in respect thereto should continue unremittingly the same until the object of it takes effect, and therefore not only any alteration or new modelling, which makes it a different estate, but also any intent of the owner to alter or new model the estate, will in construction of law render a disposition of it by Will invalid. Any alteration whatever in a freehold estate will operate as a revocation, even although the act done be necessary to give effect to the disposition made by such devise; and the rule of law will be the same although the act be expressly declared to be done with a view to give effect to the Will, if by its operation the devisor become possessed of the estate as by a new purchase : for the rule being introduced with a view to preserve the inheritance in the heir at law, and not with a view, in this instance, to carry into execution the intent of the devisor ; the question here is not whether the de- visor intended to revoke, but whether he intended to do that, the effect of which in law will be to alter the estate or interest which was in him, by passing it away and taking it back through a new channel ; for if that be his intention, whether he meant to revoke or not is immaterial ; the alteration operating as a revocation in law and not as a revo- cation by the party, and therefore taking effect without reference to the intent of the party as to the stability or non-stability of the Will. Since courts of equity have considered articles for the sale of estates, or respecting the settlement of them, as of the nature of actual conveyances, from the time at which they are agreed to be carried into execution, even covenants, when the person 1 1* ) person with whom the covenant is made has a right to a specific performance, have been allowed in equity to operate as revocations of Wills prer vioufly made. But, upon the principle that no actual alteration is made in the thing devised, the changing of truftees, where the estate originally devised is onlv the trust, will not amount to a revocation ; though the estate is absolutely conveyed to different par- ties from those who held it at the time of the de^ vise, as in the case of an intended purchase being completed, or a mortgage paid off, by the Testator. Under the head of intended alterations of his estate by the devisor may be arranged those cases, where the devisor, after making his Will, attempts a disposition of his estate, and intends a complete conveyance, but fails therein ; either for want of due formalities in the instrument that he uses, or from an incapacity to take, in the person to whom he means to convey. In these cases of intended alteration, it may be shewn that the divisor had no intent to alter the disposition he has made j and if that be made out in proof, no revocation will ensue, from the circumstance of there having been such imperfect conveyance. In all cases, where a person having lands in fee devises them, and then parts with or conveys them away, though he afterwards, nay immediately, takes a new estate in fee, this will be a revocation of his Will. And therefore where a person having made his Will, and thereby devised his real estate, afterwards, in contemplation of an intended mar- riage, conveys that estate to trustees for the use of himself and his heirs till the marriage should take effect, and after the marriage for other particular uses, but happens to die before any marriage had; this has been determined to be a revocation of his W r ill as to the disposal of such estate. But in ( 75 ) in the case of sisters being coparceners, or joint heirs, as also in the case of any persons tenants in common, having devised their several parts by Will, any partition between them, or even the levying a fine, in consequence of and to strengthen the same, shall not revoke their Will ; if the con- veyance is merely for the purpose of partition. If a man possessed of lands in fee devises the same by his Will, and afterwards mortgages them in fee, to secure a sum of moaey, though in law the legal estate is conveyed to the mortgagee, or person to whom the lands are mortgaged, and though such mortgage is therefore held in jaw to be a revocation of the devise in the Will, yet in equity it is now settled that these mortgages shall only operate as a revocation in proportion, or, as the law stiles it, pro tanto, that is, for so much as the land is mortgaged for ; by which means the devisee shall take the land under the Will, subject to the mortgage. But if I devise lands to John in fee, and afterwards mortgage the same lands to John, this has been decreed to be an entire revo- cation, it being inconsistent with the devise. A conveyance by way of mortgage for years, amounts both in law and equity only to a con- ditional revocation pro tanto of a devise in fee ; but the construction of the effect of such mort- gage is different in law and equity. In law the mortgage is considered as an absolute revocation of the devise, during the term of years for which the estate is mortgaged, but the reversionary right to the estate after the expiration of that term is held to pass by the Will : In equity such a mort- gage is considered as a revocation pro tanto only, and the right to the reversion gives the devisee also a title to the equity of redemption. If a man possessed of a leasehold estate in land for a term of years, or for a life or lives, by his Will ( 76 ) Will bequeaths the same to Johw, and after making his Will takes a new lease of the same land fry another term of years, or for other life or lives, so that the former lease is surrendered, in fact or in law, this is a revocation of his Will, or at least makes the same void as to this devise ; for this is another lease, and not that which he had at the time of the making of the Will. But these revoca- tions turn merely on the penning of the Will ; that is to say, whether the words are sufficient to pass the subsequent renewed interest, and not on any inability in point of law to give by Will an after- taken lease ; and therefore if such lease be disposed of by Will by a sufficient form of words, it will pass notwithstanding any subsequent renewal. As if one give " all his estate, right, and interest, he shall have to come in such lease at the- time of his .death." So such right of renewal will pass by a general devise of the residue, or by a devise of the lease together with the right of renewal ; and the devise of the lease carries the right of renewal as well as the lease itself. In all the above cases, where a Will is deter- mined to be revoked, and no other Will is made, a person is said to die intestate ; at least as far as concerns the devises thus revoked. In all cases also of void devises, and which we have more particularly specified, an intestacy shall take place as to those, unless there is a particular devise contained in the Will of the residue of the Tes- tator's estate to some person ; in which case the legacies sink into and become part of such residue, and go to the residuary legatee. 5. HAVING thus settled in what cases a person shall be aid to die intestate, we next proceed to explain in what manner the law disposes of his estate, as well real as personal. But ( 77 ) ^ But before proceeding to explain the descent of lands, it may be necessary to mention two estates created by' operation of law, viz. Tenancy by the curtesy, and Tenancy in dower ; the former of which prevents, for a time, the descent of the whole estate to the heir immediately on the death of the ancestor, and the latter the descent of one third part of it. Tenancy by the curtesy has been already men- tioned. By freehold lands there we mean lands which the wife has in fee-simple or fee-tail; and on the death of the wife, in this case her husband is, by the curtesy of England, entitled to remain in possession of the receipt of the rents and profits of all such land during his life, and after his death it descends to her heir. A widow is entitled to dower, that is, to one third part of all such lands as her husband had at any time during the marriage, in fee-simple or fee-tail general: the rents and profits of which third part she is by law entitled to, during her life only. By fee-tail general, we mean such an estate as will descend to any legitimate children what- ever the father may have. There is in law an estate in land called fee-tail special; that is, where the land is limited to descend to the issue of the father by some particular wife only. In such case, only the wife whose issue is to inherit is entitled to dower, and no other wife whatever. This dower a widow is entitled to, whether she has children by her husband or not. But if a woman elopes from her husband, and lives in adultery with another man, she forfeits her dower, by a particular act of parliament made for the purpose. Subject to the above mentioned rules, as to cur- tesy and dower, land, or real estate, (which words we will at present suppose to mean the same thing) always descends to the Heir-at-law where there there is no Will. Personal estate, on the con- trary, is distributed, under the rules hereafter mentioned, among all the Next-of-kin to the per- son dying intestate : of whom the heir at law may, as it will hereafter be seen, be only one. It shall therefore be the business of a few pages to explain the descent of real estate ; and afterwards we will more at large consider the distribution of personal ; and which being at present regulated by a parti- cular statute, it would be useless, and perhaps dis- agreeable, to enter into a detail of the ancient rules of the common law, or the various modes made use of by the Ordinary to engross the power over the estate ; or to trace the rise, progress, and decline of ecclefiaftical jurisdiction, now only al- lowed under the authority of the statute, and bound to act under that direction. To regulate the descent of real estate, certain rules arc laid down by the Engliih law, which it would be tedious here to enumerate at length, but the result of which is as follows. On the death of any person possessed of the whole property (or, as the law calls it, seized in fee) of land which he had himself purchased, with- out making any disposal thereof by Will, it is the general rule that his eldest son, if alive, shall in- herit. (The case of Borough-English lands forms one exception, such lands by the custom descend- ing to the youngest son ; and the custom of Ga- velkind another, by which all the sons inherit to- gether.) If such eldest son is dead, his eldest son (or other issue, according to the rules immediately laid down) succeed to the land. If the eldest son is dead without leaving any issue, then the land descends to the second, third, and all other sons respectively of the intestate, in order of birth, or their issue, in like order: the issue of an elder brother being always preferred to the person of a younger ; ts ) younger that is to say, the children of the second son to the third son himself, and so on. If a man has no sons, nor any issue of them, living at his death, his daughter is to inherit : or if he has more than one, they take the land altogether, how many soever there may be ; it being the rule of law, that where there are tv> o or more males in equal degree, the eldest only shall inherit land ; but that females inherit altogether; and in this case the daughters are called coparceners, as being joint partners in the land. If the daughters are dead, leaving issue, such issue shall inherit the land, the eldest son of each taking his mother's share 5 or if no son, their daughters equally. As for example, if a man has three daughters, all of whom die in his life time, the first leaving two sons, the second leaving two daughters, and the third a daughter and a son, the son being the youngest, his land shall be divided thus : one third part to the eldest son of the first daughter, one other third part between the two daughters of the second daughter, as coparceners, and the remaining one third to the son of the third daughter ; it being a positive rule of law relative to descents, that males are always to be preferred to females. If a man dies without any issue, the land de- scends to his eldest brother of the whole blood, {that is, a son of the father and mother of the deceased), or his issue, in the order above prescribed with respect to the issue of the owner of the land , or in case of the death of his eldest brother without issue, then to his second, third, or other whole brothers respectively, in order of birth, or their issue. If he has no brothers, then to his sisters of the whole blood all together, or their issue, subject to the same rules as above-mentioned with respect to his daughters. If he has neither son nor daughter, brother nor sister, the land then goes to the ( 80 the eldest uncle, being the son of his father's father and mother, or his issue ; and for want of such, to his other uncles by the father's side, or their issue. In defet of all these, to his aunts on the father's side, equally among them all, in like manner as to his daughters or sisters-. It would be needless to trace the rule of descent any further, the above being sufficient to extend to all common cases. The reader is to observe that land can never lineally ascend ; that is, it can never go to the father or mother, grandfather or grandmother, of the person dying ; but shall rather escheat, i. e. lapse to, and become the property of the King, or the Lord of the Fee, for default of heirs. It may, however, ascend collaterally to his uncles or aunts : and thus a man may, in certain events, obtain lands by inheritance which were formerly his son's; as where one dies without Will, not having issue, leaving only a father and an uncle (the father's brother) ; in this case the uncle shall take the lands as heir to his nephew, and if he also dies without Will, they will from him descend to his brother, the father of the original intestate. But in case the person dying was not himself the purchaser of the land, but that the estate in fatt descended to him from his father or mother, or any other ancestor, it is to be remarked, that the blood of that line of ancestors from whom the land did not descend can never inherit. Thus if the land descended from his father, his mother's re- lations, as sue/1, can never inherit it ; and in like manner the father's relations can never inherit land descended from the mother. It is also necessary to remind the reader, that Delations of the half blood only can never succeed to land, but are entirely deprived of any title .it soever to the land by descent. In all cases therefore, ( 81 ) therefore, the collateral heir (such as brother, nephew, uncle, &c ) must be the nearest kinsn.an of the zvhole blood ; that is, derived not only fiom the same ancestor, but from the same couple of ancestors. Thus if a man has two sons by two diffe ; ent wives, and dies, and his firft son takes the land, as heir to him, and dies without issue, the son by the other mother, being only his half brother, shall never inherit the land as heir to his brother. But if one possessed of fee-simple land dies, leaving a brother and two sons by different wives, on his death his land shall descend to his eldest son, as before mentioned ; and in case of the death of such eldest son without issue, it shall come to his uncle, the father's brother ; and then, if the uncle should happen to die without issue, the land shall from him descend to his nephew, the half brother of the son from \vhom it came to the uncle 5 such nephew being heir to the uncle of the whole blood, notwithstanding he could not inherit the land as heir to his elder brother. If, also, the eldest of two half brothers happens to die without entering on or taking possession of the estate, the youngest brother may inherit the estate; not as heir to his half brother, but as heir to their common father. The total exclusion of the half blood from the inheritance being almost peculiar to our own law, is looked upon as a strange hardship by such as are unacquainted with the reasons on which it is grounded ; and which arise from the best general principles, without regard to any private incon- veniences that may now and then happen. It is remarkable^ however that the Crown, which is the highest inheritance in the nation, may descend to the half blood of the preceding Sovereign. Before the death of a person possessed of real estate, the person who is next in the line of suc- G cession ( 82 ) cession is called an Heir apparent, or Heir pi*~ sumptive. Heirs apparent are such whose right of inheritance cannot be defeated in case they outlive their ancestor ; as the eldest son or his issue, who must, by the course of the common law, be heir to the rather whenever he happens to die. Heirs presumptive are such, who, if the ancestor should die immediately, would in the present circum- stances of things be his heirs, but whose right of inheritance may be defeated by the contingency of some nearer heir being born ; as a brother or nephew, whose presumptive succession may be destroyed by the birth of a child ; or a daughter, whose present hopes may hereafter be cut off by the birth of a son. This title to lands by succession may also be de- feated, even after the person who was heir to the ancestor at the time of his death, has obtained possession of the lands. Thus if an estate hath descended to a brother, nephew, or daughter ; in the case of a brother or nephew the estate shall be, as the law terms it, devested and taken away from them, by the birth of a posthumous child ; that is, a child of the ancestor from whom they inherit, born after the death of such ancestor ; and in the case of a daughter such estate shall also be totally devested by the birth of a posthumous son. So if lands are given to a son, who dies, leaving a sister his heir, if the parents at any distance of time afterwards have another son, this son shall defeat the former descent upon the sister, and shall take the land as heir to the deceased brother. The same estate may even be frequently devested by the future birth of nearer presumptive heirs before it fixes upon an heir apparent ; as if an estate is given to an only child, who dies, it may descend to an aunt, who may be stripped of it by an after-born uncle, on whom a subsequent sister may enter ; and ( 83 ) and who will again be deprived of the estate by the birth of a brother, the heir apparent, whose title cannot be defeated. To enter further into this so nice a subject wouM but perplex those for whom these sheets are in* tended. We shall therefore immediately proceed to the distribution of an Intestate's personal estate. 6. BY the statute 22 and 23 Car. 2. c. 10. commonly called the Statute of Distributions, (be- ing made in order to regulate the distribution of estates of intestates, i. e. of such as died without Will), it is enacted, that the remainder of the perso- nal estates of such intestates, after paying their debts and funeral expences, shall, at the expiration of one full year from the death of the intestate, which is allowed for the purpose of paying a due regard (as the statute expresses it) ro creditors, be distributed in trre following manner, viz : One third part thereof shall go to the widow of the in- testate, and the residue to be divided in equal pro- portions among his children -, or if any of .them-are dead, to their legal representatives, that is, their li- neal descendants. If there are no children, or legal representatives of them subsisting, then one half the estate shall in all cases go to the widow, and the other half be distributed equally among all the next of kindred to the intestate, in equal degree, and their representatives. If there is no widow, the whole estate goes among the children ; if there is neither widow nor children, the whole of the estate shall be distributed among all the next of kin, in equal degree, and the representatives of such of them as may happen to be dead, if such next of kin are brothers and sisters, but not else ; no repre- sentatives of other relations being admitted. The next of kindred here referred to shall be soon more particularly specified. G 2 Out .Out of -the above rule of distribution all such chil- dren are cxcepted (except the heir at law) as may have had an estate settled on them by the intestate in* his- lite time, or may have been advanced by him, by marriage portions or other gifts, equal to the share which would be due to them under such distribution. And if the estate or portion so given them by the intestate in his life time is not equal to their distributive share, they or their representa- tives shall then be entitled to so much only of their father's estate under this statute as will make the shares of all the children as equal as possible. But the eldest son and heir at law, or any other son who may be heir by particular custom, as the youngest son under the custom of Borough Eiag&sh, though he may have land by descent of ever so large a value, and though he may have had any land given him by his father, the intestate, in his life time, is nevertheless entitled to his proportion in the intestate's personal estate equally with the other children. But if the heir at law has had any advancement from his father in money, he must, like the other children, allow for that, to make his share of the estate equal with their's. In all cases where children have been advanced in the father's life time by gift of a marriage portion or otherwise, and the father afterwards dies intes- tate, if this marriage portion is not equal to the share due under the statute of distributions, the rule is, for such children to allow what they have so received to be part of the personal estate of the deceased, and then to take their distributive share out of the whole. Thus, if a man dies worth 20001. leaving three daughters, one of whom in his life time has received 5001. from him, in order to make an equal distribution under the statute, the advanced daughter must bring this 5001. into notchpot, that is, mix it with the other personal estate ( 35 ) estate of her father, making that by this means the sum of 25001. to one third part of which whole sum each daughter is entitled, being the sum of 8331. 6s. 8d. and which the two unadvanced daughters will accordingly receive out of the 200O1. the estate of the father at his decease, and will thereby leave the sum of 3331. 6s. 8d. for the ad- vanced daughter, which, with her former portion, will make all their shares exactly equal. It is to be remembered, that where the intestate leaves a widow, her one third part or share is in all cases to be in the first place deducted out of his whole personal estate, before any distribution is made among the children. 7. WE will now. proceed further to explain who are the Next-of-kin. A man's nearest of kin, and who are to take his personal estate, under the above statute, together with his widow, in the proportions before mention- ed, or in case there is no widow, the whole of such estate ; are, in the first place, his children and their representatives, who are particularly provided for in the act. In case there are no children, but only grand-children, then the personal estate belongs to such grandchildren. If he has no wife, chil- dren, or grandchildren, or issue of them, and his father is living, such father shall take the whole of his personal estate. If his father is dead, then, by the Act 1 Jac. 2. c. 17. his mother (if he has no brothers and sisters) shall take the whole ; or if he leaves brothers and sisters, the mother and they shall divide his effects in equal proportions, whe- ther such brothers and sisters are of the half or the whole blood, this making no difference in the suc- cession to personal estate. If he leave a wife, and also a mother, and brothers and sisters, the wife shall G 3 ( 86) shall have only one half of his effects (see 6. p. 83) the remainder going to his mother, brothers, and sisters equally. If his wife, father, and mother are all dead, then between all his brothers and sisters equally, and the children of such of them as may be dead ; or if he has only one brother or sister, the whole estate goes to such one. If he has neither children, father, mother, brothers, nor sisters, it shall go to the grandfather, or if he is dead, the grandmother.* If none of these are liv- ing, then such of his uncles and aunts, and ne- phews and nieces, as may be living at his death, take his personal estate equally amongst them. And lastly, if there are none of the above relations, his first cousins equally share and share alike ; and no person is ever admitted to take as a representa- tive of another except the issue of the intestate's children, and the children of his brothers and sjsters. In order to elucidate and explain the above, a Jew observations may be necessary. And 1ft, it is a rule, that in all cases where there is only one person who is next of kin to the intestate, there be- ing no other relation in equal degree, that one person shall take the whole, as if there be but one child and no grandchildren; and as in the case above mentioned of the father of the intestate. 2dly, Where representation is allowed, all the children of such deceased person, as maybe entitled to a share, take such their parent's share among them all. As if a man dies intestate, leaving two children, a grandchild by another of his children, and two * In a cate where the next of kin to an intestate were a grard- father by the father's side, and a grandmother by the mother's side, it was determined they should each take half of the estate. grandchildren ( 87') grandchildren of another, each of his two children shall take one fourth part, the grandchild of one of the deceased children shall have another one fourth part, and the two grandchildren of the other de- ceased child shall have the remaining one fourth between them. The reason of this being, that the grandchildren do not take this share in their own right as next of kin, but as representatives of their deceased parent, the children of the intestate. For if a man leaves only grandchildren, as for ex- ample, two grandchildren by one son, three by another son, and five by a daughter, there each of the grandchildren shall take one tenth part, be- cause they, in this case, claim their share in their own rights as next of kin, and al^are so in an equal degree. Sdly, If a person dies without children, grand- children, father, or mother, and his estate is divided between his brothers and sisters, or their children, the same kind of rule is adopted as in the above case of children and grandchildren j as if there are two brothers, one sister, and three nephews and nieces (children of a deceased brother or sister) here the two brothers and the sister living each take one fourth part, and the three nephews or nieces the remaining one fourth between them, as personal representatives of their deceased parent^ the brother or sister of .the intestate, 4thly, If he has no children, grandchildren, fa- ther, mother, brothers, nor sisters, but a grand- mother living, she shall take the whole of the estate, and his uncles and aunts, if he has any, shall not share with her, contrary to the case of his own mother, and brothers and sisters. 5thly, In case of an intestate's death, leaving only uncles and aunts, and nephews and nieces, (children of a deceased brother or sister of the in- testate) the uncles and aunts of the intestate take G 4 equally ( 83 ) equally with his neohews and nieces, "being all Vie next of kin in equal degree. 6-hIy, If when a man dies he leaves his wife with chilJ, such c'.rld, when horn, shall have an eoual share with his other children, or such other f r -::rc as it would have b^en entitled unto, if born livi'.g at the time of his death. 8. THUS an- attempt has been made familiarly to explain the nature and rules of the distribu- tion of the elites of such as die vi'ho t Will, l^ift it is yet- further to be remarked, that the sta'ute a x>ve me/.t o ed expressly excepts and re- . >: custonis of the City of London, o^ the province of Yorl% and of all othe^ places having peculiar cu-tins, of distributing Intestates' estates; ^t though, i i t k>Se r>hres, th- restrc?int which persons were formerly iai.l under bv these custcros, with respect ^o devising, is now removed bv t ]> e Several statutes mentioned in the farmer part of th'i'o - .vork ; ir et t!i' a^c : ent customs remain in full f/>rc% as far is the*- re nect the distribution c r the i^Btitea o c .uch as die witi^out Will ; some of ^hich w<- shall *h refore proceed to mentirn. In tie first place, in the citv of London and pro- vince of York, the effects of the Intestate, after r- n. i nt of his debts, are divided in the following m inner, viz. If the deceased leaves a widow and children, his person -il estate (deducting the widow's apparel and furniture of her bed-chamber, which in London is CHI led the widow's chamber) is di- vided into three parts, one of which belongs to the widow, another to the children, and the third to the administ ator;- if only a widow, or only chil- dren, they shall respectively, in either case, take one half, and the administrator the other half; if neither widow nor child, the administrator shall have the whole, and this share, thus given to the administrator, ( 89 ) 'administrator,- and called the dead man's par f , the used to apply to his own use, till the- staUi'e 1 J.'c. ( 2. c. 17. declared that the same >e' subject to th: statutes of distribution; -refore, this one third part is distributed in rne manner, where these customs prevail, as f - "/hole of the estate is in other cases of int,?s- tacv% or dying without Will. So that if a dies worth iSOOl. leaving a widow and a child or children, the estate shall be .divided into three parts v of these three parts the widow shall have one, being 6001. by the custom, and the child or children another 6001. also under the custom, ?.i d the remaining one third, being the de.id man's share, or 6001. is to be divided as directed by the statute; that is, one third, being 2001. to the widow, and the remaining two thirds, being 40OI. to the child or children; so that in the whole the widow has 8001. and the child or children 10001. that 10001. to be divid-d among the children, if more than one ; or if there is only one child to belong to such one. If he leaves a widow, and no child, the widow shall have three fourths of the whole personal estate ; that is, one half of the whole by the custom, and half of the remaining half under the statute ; and the remaining one- fourth part shall under the statute be distributed to the next of kin. It is also to be observed, that if the wife be provided for by a jointure before rrar- riage, in bar of her customary part, she shall not be entitled to any thing by virtue ot the custom ; but she shall nevertheless have her share under the statute of distributions of that one-third which the custom gives to the administrator, and which he is directed to distribute according!'/ ; unless she is barred of that by special agreement. And if any of the children are aivancel by the father in his life time with any sum of money (not amounting to their ( 90 ) their full proportionate part) they must allow for that to the rest of the brothers and sisters, in the same manner as has been mentioned with respect to distributions of the whole estate under the sta- tute, but not to the widow, before they are entitled to any benefit under the custom ; if they are fully advanced, the custom entitles them to no farther dividend. Thus far in the main the customs of London and of York agree ; but besides certain other less ma- terial variations, which it would be here needless to mention, there are two principal points in which they considerably differ. One is, that in London the share of the children (or as it is there called their orphanage part) is not fully vested in them till the age of twenty-one, before which they cannot dispose of it by Will: and if they die under that age, whether married or not, their share shall survive to the other children ; but after the age of twenty-one it becomes their absolute property, and may be disposed of by Will, or, in case of their dying without Will, distributed under the statute, like their other personal estate. The other diffe- rence is, that in the province of York, the heir at common law, who inherits any lands, either in fee or in tail, is excluded from any filial portion, or reasonable part. 9. IN all the above cases, by children must be understood legitimate chilren, i. e. such as are born, in lawful wedlock; a bastard being in law ac- counted the son of no one, and therefore incapable of taking by descent or under the statute of dis- tributions ; and if such bastard, who can have no relations or next of kin, except his wife and chil- dren, dies intestate, without a wife or any issue, (children or grandchildren) leaving a personal estate, in this case the King is entitled to such personal (91 ) personal estate, and administration thereof will te granted to anyone whom the King shall appoint by his letters patent ; and which is generally, in such cases, grantee} by his Majesty to such person; as appear to have the most equitable claim. If a married woman dies without any Will, a? she generally must, administration of all her good* belongs of right to her husband, as her next oi kin, or most lawful friend, within the statute of distributions. - And this is confirmed by the statute of 29 Car. 2. c. 3. enacting that the statute of distributions shall not extend to the estates of married women who shall die without Will, but that their hus- bands may demand and have administration of their rights, credits, and other personal estates, and recover and enjoy the same as they might have done before the making of the said act : and the husband is accordingly entitled to the whole perso- nal estate, and becomes her personal representative to all intents and purposes. And if the husband -dies after the wife, before administration taken out by him, his executors or administrators, and not the wife's next of kin, shall be entitled. But where the wife is executrix to another, then as to the goods which she had in that capacity, ad- ministration must be granted to the next of kin to the person to whom she was executrix, his personal estate belonging to them CHAP. CHAP. VII. . OF THE APPOINTMENT AND POWER OF EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS. i. Executors } iuhat they are. 2. Not compilable to aft, but may refuse If they refuse, they must - r.ot meddle luitb the Efferts of the deceased. 3. Administrators, , are capable of making Wills, and many others be- side ; as, married women and infants, nay, even infants unborn, or yet in their mother's womb {in -centre sa mere is the. legal term of such), may be made executors: but it was always the rule of law that no infant could act as executor before he was seventeen years old, till which time adminis- tration must have been granted to some other per- son, during such infancy or minority. And now, 'by the Act 38 Geo. 3. c. 87. 6, 7, reciting that great inconveniencies arise from granting probates to infants under twenty-one, it is- enacted, that where an infant is sole executor, administration, with the Will annexed, shall be granted to the guardian of such infant, or to such other person as the spiritual court shall think fit, until such infant shall have attained the full age of twenty-one years, when, and not before, probate of the Will shall be granted to him such administrator to have the same power as other administrators, du- rante minori cctate. [See post, 4.] 2. BUT though a person is appointed an executor by a Will, he cannot be compelled to un- dertake the executorship against his own desire, unless he has, after the death of the testator, med- dled with his goods as executor ; for then he is not only to be compelled to perform the office of an executor, but even if he should refuse so to do, his refusal w r ould then be void, and he should be charged as executor- and therefore if the executor named in the Will is resolved not to act, but to re- fuse the executorship, he must be particularly care- ful that he does not administer the goods of the deceased as executor; for if he has once adminis- tered as executor he may at any time after be com- pelled to undergo the burden of that office, and may ( *') maybe sued as such by the creditors of the Testator, though he cannot sue any person debtor to the Testator until he proves the Will, and which he must then do in his own defence. A person is said to administer as executor, so as thereby to be compelled to accept the executorship, when he performs those acts which are proper to an executor, as by paying the debts due from the Testator, or receiving any debts due to him, or giving acquittances for the same, with other such like acts; but generally whoever, as a mere tres- passer, takes possession of any of the goods or effects of the Testator, and converts the same to his own use, and not to the use of the Testator (as to the payment of his debts or legacies) does not ad- minister as executor. The most safe course, how- ever, is not to meddle at all, but to refrain entirely from any disposition whatever of the Testator's goods. Yet even where a person has not med- dled with the goods of the Testator at all, and is therefore not compellable to accept the executor- ship, yet if a legacy is left to him as executor by the Will, he may be compelled either to act as executor, or on refusal to lose his legacy. This refusal of a person to take upon him the executorship, cannot be by word only, but it must be entered and recorded in the ecclesiastical court. If any person, not being appointed executor by the Will of the deceased, nor having administration granted to him by the Ordinary (as after mentioned) takes upon him to intermeddle with the goods or effects of the deceased, and to act as executor, he becomes executor of his own wrong, (de son tort) and shall be answerable both to the rightful exe- cutor or administrator, and to the creditors of the deceased, to the amount of the effects administered by him, and he mav pay the Testator's just debts with such effects, the payment of which debts shall { 95 ) shall he allowed him , and in case such executor of his 6wn wrong dies, having any goods cf the deceased in his hand, his executor or administrator shall be liable to answer for the same, as he him- self must have done if living. Where there are several executors named in the Will, some of whom refuse to act, and others of them prove the Will, they who refuse may after- wards at their pleasure administer, notwithstand- ing such refusal, before the Ordinary : and this is what in the spiritual court is called a double prc- bate, which is in this manner ; the first executor who comes in takes probate of the Will in the usual form, with a reservation to the rest. After- wards, if another comes in, he also is to be sworn in the usual manner, and an engrossment or fair copy of the original Will is to be annexed to his probate, in the same manner it was to the first ; and in the second grant such first grant is to be recited, and so on if there are more that come in afterwards: for notwithstanding their refusal at first, they still continue executors, and at any time during the lives of their fellow executors they may prove the Will, they may pay debts, make releases, and they must be joined in all suits where the executors are plaintiffs, because they are all privy to the Will ; though it is not necessary where the/ are defendants ; because the plaintiff in any action against them is not bound by law to take notice of any but those who have proved the Will. If a man makes two executors, and dies, and one of them proves the Will in the name of them both, without the consent of the other ; yet this is not any administration by him who refused the exe- cutorship, but he may plead to any action brought against him as executor, that he never was exe- cutor ; for neither the Will or probate make him so, if he does not administer. WHE2C ( 96 ) 3. WHEN all the executors named in the Will refuse to act, the bishop of the diocese or Ordinary may commit admini tration, with the Will of the deceased annexed, under the rules aftermentioned; and in such case the person to \\hom this adminis- tration is granted is called the administrator of the deceased with the Will annexed, and may admi- nister the goods j and his duty is then very similar to that of an executor. This authority of the ad- ministrator, and any act done by him in pursurnce of it, is good and effectual in law, till the executor undertakes the executovship, and proves the \Y ill ; as it is said he may even then do ; and that in such case the Ordinary may afterwards revoke the ad- ministration : but the Ordinary cannct certainly repeal an administration at his pleasure ; and the rule with respect to this seems to be, that an ad- ministration may be repealed, although not arbi- trarily, yet where there shall be just cause for so doing, of which the courts of lav, 7 are to judge, as if the administrator should happen to become insane, insolvent, or the like. And so if the person who is next of kin, at the time of the death of the in- testate, happens to be incapable of administering-, by reason of any legal impediment, (attaint or ex- communication for example) and the Ordi' commits administration to another; if the next of kin afterwards becomes capable, the Ordinarv rr-av repeal such administration, and commit it to the next of kin. If a man makes his Will without appointing any persons to be his executors, or'the executors named are unknown, and cannot be found out, or are in- capable of acting, or disabled from being executors ,- or in case the executor is dead before the Testator, or dies after the Testator and before proving the Will; in all these cases an administration must be granted by the Ordinary, with the Will annexed,. to to the person to whom the residue is bequeathed by the Will, and if this person were the deceased executor, then to his executor or personal repre- sentative. If there were no devisee of The residue, then to such persons as would be entitled to ad- ministration in case there had been no Will : In this latter case of dying without any Will (the con- sequences of which have been more fully explained in the foregoing chapter), administration shall be granted to such persons as are appointed by the several statutes, and who those persons are we will immediately proceed to explain ; first observing, that in all cases (except where there is a contro- versy depending whether there is a Will or not) the Ordinary may be compelled to grant adminis- tration to the person who is entitled to it ; and that if he refuses, a writ of mandamus will be granted by the Court of King's Bench, commanding him to grant it ; though the person entitled to adminis- tration may if he pleases refuse to take it upon him, and the Ordinary has no power whatever to compel him to accept it. By an act of parliament of 9 and 10 W. 3. c. 32. persons denying the Trinity, or asserting that there are more Gods than one, or denying the Christian religion to be true, or the holy sciiptures to be of divine authority, shall for the second offence be disabled from being administrators. 4. THE statute of the 21 H. 8. c. 5. enacts, that in case any person dies without a Will, or the executors narncd in any Will refuse to prove it, then the Ordinarv, or other person having authority to take probate of \Vills, shall grant the adminis- tration of the goods of the deceased to his widow, or next of kin, or both y as the Ordinary shall think proper. And where several persons claim the ad- ministration, as next of kin, who are all equal in H degree ( 98 ) degree of kindred to the person deceased, or where one person desires the administration as next of kin, there being several persons in equality of kin- dred with him ; in every such case the Ordinary shall be at liberty to grant the administration to the widow and one of the next of kin only, jointly or separately, as he pleases. By virtue of the statute last mentioned, adminis- tration shall generally be granted to the widow or next of kin. Who those next of kin are, comes more properly under the head concerning the dis- tribution of the estates of such as die without Will, and which has been there fully explained ; those who are entitled to share the estate being entitled, under the above restrictions, to administration. There is, ho\vever, one exception to this rule, as to the next of kin, in case the executor refuses, or having accepted the executorship, dies without appointing any executor by his Will ; this excep- tion is in favour of a residuary legatee in a Will , or he being entitled to all that remains after debts and legacies paid, has certainly the first and best title to be administrator of the estate. The devise of the residue to him taking away the presumption xvhich the ftatute otherwise makes, that the Tes- tator would have given such residue to the next of kin. Besides the administrators already mentioned, there are also several others. As administrator during the absence of the next of kin to an intes- tate out of the kingdom, which is a great conve- nience ; for if his next of kin happens to be beyond sea at the time of the death of any one dying without Will, the administration could not otherwise be granted, and the effects of the de- ceased might be squandered away, and the c. due to him lost, for want of proper care and a time I v administration. Administration ( 99 ) Administration is also sometimes granted to an indifferent person while a suit is depending, which is called in law an administration pendents lite ; or if there is no dispute or controversy, then till the executor comes in; and particularly under the statute 38 G. 3. c. 87, in case of the executor's absence out of the realm at any time after twelve months from the death of the Testator, a creditor, next of kin, or legatee, is allowed to take out a special administration for the purpose of recovering their demand against the Testator's effects. All these limited administrations cease of course, as soon as the consideration ceases on which they were first granted. We have already mentioned that an infant, though ever so young, may be appointed an exe- cutor, but that the execution of the Will shall not be committed to him until he is twenty-one years old, [see page 93,] till when administration is to be granted to some one, who is in such case called administrator dnrante minori tftate, i. e. during the minority of the infant executor, and which admi- nistration ceases as soon as the executor attains his age of twenty-one ; and where the infant exe- cutor is a female, who before twenty-one marries a husband of full age, yet the administration shall not cease till she herself is twenty-one years old compleat. Formerly an administration, during the minority of an infant executor, ceased at his age of seventeen, but it was always the rule of law that an administration during the minority of an infant administrator (which is granted when the next of kin, or other person, who is entitled to the administration, is not of age) did not cease till he was twenty-one years old ; the reason of this was, because every administrator is obliged to enter into a bond duly to administer the effects of the deceased, an act which an infant under twenty- H 2 one one is not permitted to do ; and this provision of law is now very properly extended to infant exe- cutors. Where administration is granted during the minority of several executors, he who comes first of age shall prove the Will, and the adminis- tration shall immediately cease. 4 If a married woman, as next of kin, has a right to administer, the administration ought not to be granted to the husband and wife jointly, but to the wife only ; for otherwise, if she should die before him he would continue administrator against the meaning of the act. But if a wife who, as a residuary legatee, has a right to take administra- tion, refuses so to do, and prays it may be granted to another, and not to her husband, yet it may be granted to him, he being, entitled to all she would have as residuary legatee. Where administration is granted to two persons, and one dies, the administration survives to him who is living. If none of the next of kin will take out admi- nistration, a creditor may, by custom, do it ; and lastly, the Ordinary may, in defect of all these, commit administration to such discreet person as he approves of, or may grant to such person his letters, merely to collect together the goods of the deceased ; which do not make the person thus- appointed either executor or administrator, his only business being to keep the goods in his safe custody, and wherewith the Ordinary is to satisfy debts and legacies (if there is any Will) as far as the goods will go ; to the payment of which the Ordinary, by this means, becomes liable in the same, manner as an executor or administrator. 5. IT may be here necessary just shortly to mention the oath which an executor or adminis- trator takes, on having probate of the Will, or administration administration of the effects granted to him, and also the bond which he is obliged to enter into ; in order that every person may be aware what their duty is, and what is imposed upon them by those sacred obligations ; which (through the multi- plicity of business) being entered into in a vast hurry, may not always have that solemn attention paid to them which objects of so highly serious a nature deserve. If the administration is granted in consequence of there having been no Will, the administrator swears, (or being a Quaker, solemnly affirms) that he believes the deceased died without Will, and that he (the administrator) is the son, next of kin, &c. (as the case may be) to the deceased ; and then, in that ahd all other cases, proceeds to bind himself by his oath, well and truly to administer all the goods of the deceased, and to pay his debts, so far as hrs goods will extend, to exhibit a true, full, and perfect inventory of such goods, and to render a true account of his administration unto the court from whence the administration issues, when he shall be lawfully required so to do. And by the statute of 22 &: 23 Car. 2. c. 10. on granting administration, the administrator enters into a bond, with two sureties, according to the value of the estate; w r hich bonds are determined to be legal, and by which he binds himself to the Ordinary, or person having power to grant such administration, to make, or cause to be made, a true and perfect inventory of all the goods and chattels, debts, and effects of the said deceased, which have come, or shall or may come, to his hands, possession, or knowledge, or to the hands and possession of any other person or persons for his use ; and to exhibit or shew the same inventory into the registry of the court from whence the administration issues, within a certain time, and H 3 well ( 102 ) well and truly to administer all such goods and effects according to law ; and also to make a true and just account of his said administration, within the time mentioned in the bond, and to distribute the residue or remainder of the deceased's estate according to law; and in case any Will shall appear and be proved in due form, then to relin- quish the administration, and account with the executor. 6. THE power of an executor is founded upon the special confidence and actual appointment of the deceased by his Will; but an administrator is merely an officer of the Ordinary, prescribed to him by act of parliament, in whom the deceased had reposed no trust at all, and whose pow r er over the effects of the deceased arises from several statutes made for the purpose, and on whose death it results back to the Ordinary to appoint another : for this reason, the interest vested in my executor, by my Will, may be continued and kept alive by the Will of the same executor ; so that the executor of my executor is, to all intents and purposes, my executor and representative, as much as the person -whom I originally named my executor, his execu- tor representing him in the same manner as I appointed him to represent me. But the Adminis- trator of my executor has no privity or relation to me, being only commissioned to administer the effects belonging to my executor himself, and not my goods which he had as executor; and in like manner, if I die without Will, and an administrator is appointed to me, who dies and appoints an ex- ecutor, such executor shall not be my represen- tative : but in all cases where an administrator dies, and there remain any effects of the person to whom he was administrator undisposed or or unad- ministered, the Ordinary must commit the adminis- tration ( 103 tration of such unadministered goods to another person, who is then called an administrator de boms no?i, that is, of the goods not administered by a former administrator. And in such case, this administrator de bonis non is the only legal and personal representative of the deceased. Having thus shewn what is an executor or ad- ministrator, and the difference between them, we will, in the next chapter, proceed to enquire into some of the principal points, of their office and duty ; first adding a few words with respect to the appointment of guardians to the children of the Testator. .7. WHERE a person dies, leaving children under age, it is now usual to appoint guardians, but which were forjnerly, with respect to such as were heirs to real estates, certain persons entitled by law. The father, and he only, is authorised to appoint a guardian to such children as may be under twenty-one years of age at the time of his death : and this he may do either by Deed or Will, to be executed in the presence of two witnesses ; such guardianship to continue till they are twenty- one, or for any shorter time ; and bv the statute of 12 C/ift. 2. c, 24. a remedy is given to the guar- dian against any person who shall unjustly take away such child, to recover him, and damages for the child's benefit. This guardian has also the management of the child's lands, goods, and money, during its minority, and is to account for the same, and to have all reasonable allowances. Jt may often be prudent to make the executors of a Will guardians to the children, but it is not necessary ; the father being capable of appointing whom he pleases, and this, though he himself should happen to be under the age of twenty-one sjt the time of making such appointment, or at Ii 4 the ( 104 ) the time of his death, and though he is therefore incapable of disposing of his lands by Will. By the custom of York, a mother may appoint a guardian to her children, as to the personal estate, but not as to land. And in all cases where no guardian is appointed, or if the guardians' ap- pointed die or refuse to act, the power of appoint- ing guardians devolves to the Lord Chancellor, he being (under the King) the supreme guardian of infants, and all others not capable of acting for themselves. CHAP ( 105 ) CHAP. VIII. OF THE OFFICE AND DUTY OF EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS. i. Distinction between Executors and Administrators. ^. Burying the Deceased. 3. Obtaining Probate of the Will, in common Form, or solemnly Distinction and Reasons thereof. 4. Letters of Administration. 5. In what Court i Wills are to be proved. 6. Making Inventory Commission of Appraisement. 7. Collecting together Effects Payment of Debts, and Rules. as to Priority and Preference in so doing Proceeding by Creditors where the Executor is out of the Kingdom. 8. Payment of Legacies, and Rules therein Of Legacies in Satis- faction of Debts. 9. Lapsing and vesting of Legacies Interest on Legacies Legacies to Infants. lo. Disposition of the Residue of the Estate. 1. JL HE duties of an executor and administrator are in general very much the same, excepting, first, that the executor being appointed by Will, is bound to perform such Will, which an administrator is not, unless where the Will is annexed to his administration, and then he differs still less from an executor : And secondly, that an executor may do many things before he proves the Will ; but an administrator can do nothing till letters of adminis- tration are granted to him : the executor, as we have already said, deriving his -power from the Will, ( 106 ) Will, and not from the probate ; whereas that of the administrator arises entirely from the appoint- ment of the Ordinary. 2. THE first thing necessary for, him to do is to bury the deceased, in a manner suitable to the estate which he leaves behind him. Necessary funeral expences are allowed in preference to all other -debts and charges whatever ; but if the ex- ecutor or administrator is extravagant in the fune- ral, it is a species o-f devastation or waste of the effects of the deceased, which he is not justified in, and which shall only be prejudicial to himself, and not to the creditors or legatees of the deceased. S. THE next duty of the executor is to prove the Will of the deceased, and which must also be done by the administrator, if there is any Will, and where the administrator is appointed during the minority or absence of an executor. This is done either in common form, which is upon the oath of the executor or administrator himself, and of the witnesses to the Will, before the Ordinary or his deputy ; or in case the validity of the Will happens to be disputed, then it is proved in a more solemn form of la\v. In this last case it is requisite that all such persons as have any interest in the estate of the deceased, that is to say, his widow and next of kin, to whom the administration of his goods ought to be committed, if he had died with- out Will, must be cited or summoned to be pre- sent at the probation and approbation of the Will, in whose presence the Will is to be exhibited to the judge, and a petition to be made by the part}* who produced the Will and demands probate of it ; then the witnesses to the Will, and others if necessary, are received and sworn accordingly, and are examined every one of them, privately and separately, ( 107 ) separately, not only upon the allegation or articles made by the party producing them, and who re- quires the probate to be granted him, but also upon interrogatories or questions in writing put to them by the adverse party summoned for that pur- pose ; and the depositions of the witnesses thus taken are then committed to writing, and after- wards published ; and in case the proof is sufficient, the judge, by his sentence or decree, pronounces for the validity of the Will, and a probate thereof is accordingly granted to the person requiring it. This manner of solemnly proving the Will is made use of for the greater security of the executor; as, if the Will is at first only proved in common form, the widow and next of kin of the deceased may call on the executor afterwards for this solemn proof, \vhen perhaps the witnesses to the Will are dead, and many difficulties may arise to him. It is also usual, when the executor has any conside- rable part of the estate and effects left him, to prove the Will thus solemnly in the first instance, and which the executor may always do at his own will and pleasure, citing the widow and next of kin in particular, and all persons pretending interest in general ; and then the Will can never afterwards be disputed. If, however, the Will is proved in common form only, but remains undisputed for a certain number of years (it is said thirty years are necessary) its validity cannot then be called in question ; but it shall be supposed to have been solemnly and incontestably proved at first. To prevent neglects and frauds which had taken place, by- persons acting as executors or adminis-. trators without the regular authority from the ec- clesiastical courts, it was enacted by 37 Geo. 3. c. 90. 10. that every executor or administrator shall prove the Will of the deceased, or take out letters of administration (to his personal estate) within six calendar ( 108 ) calendar months next after the death of his Tes- tator or intestate, on penalty of fifty pounds in case of neglect, one half to the King, and the other to the informer. 4. IF the executor refuses to prove the Will, the Ordinary may cite or summon him to the ec- clesiastical court, for the purpose of proving the same, or declaring his refusal to accept the exe- cutorship, \vhich he must do in open court, and which refusal will be entered of record accord- ingly [see before, page 94 ;] in which latter case the Ordinary will grant administration to the per- son entitled to demand the same ; and, on the other hand, if the Ordinary should refuse to grant a probate, or administration, he may be compelled so to do by a writ of mandamus for the purpose. When the Will is thus proved, the original must be deposited in the registry of the Ordinary before whom it is proved ; and a copy of it in parchment is made gut, together with a certificate of its having been proved, under the seal of the Ordinary, and delivered to the executor or administrator ; all which together is commonly called the Probate* If there is no Will, the person entitled to be ad- ministrator must take out letters of administration, which are also given under the Ordinary's seal, and by which a power like that of an executor is vested in him to collect and administer ; that i?, to dispose of the goods of the deceased according to law, and he then takes the oath, and enters into the bond before mentioned for the faithful per- formance of his trust. [Sec before, pa. 100, 101.] 5. WITH respect to the courts from whence these probates and letters of administration issue, a few words may b^ thought necessary. Ancicntb- when any one died without a Will, the bishop o'f the ( 109 ) the diocese took possession of his personal fortune, in order to dispose of it for the benefit of. his soul, that is, to pious or charitable uses. It became necessary, therefore, that the bishop should be satisfied of the authenticity of the Will, where there was any, before he resigned the right which he had to take possession of the dead man's for- tune, in case of intestacy. In this way, Wills, and controversies relating to Wills, came within the cognizance of ecclesiastical courts; under the jurisdiction of which, \Vills of personal property (the only Wills that were made formerly) still continue, though, in truth, no more now-a-days connected with religion, than any other instrument of conveyance. This is a peculiarity in the English law. The bishops are called the Ordinaries of the several dioceses within which the person dying has effects. But as, trom the extension of pro- perty consequent to the commercial spirit of the country, it often, and indeed where the person dying is worth any thing considerable, necessarilr, happens that his effects lie in different dioceses, in order to avoid so many probates or letters of ad- ministration as would have been otherwise made, from each Ordinary claiming to grant them for the effects in his diocese, it was necessary to lay down some rule which might prevent the uncertainties which would arise from thence to creditors and legatees, who would be ignorant upon which of the several executors or administrators they were to make their demands. It is now therefore set- tled, that where a man dies having goods and effects in more dioceses than one, the archbishop shall, by his prerogative, grant probate or adminis- tration of the whole goods and effects to the executor or administrator. And to avoid uncer- tainty, the quantity of goods in different dioceses must be of such a value as to be sufficiently re- markable -4 markable to attract some little notice. This is now settled at 51. If any one, therefore, has goods or effects to the value of 51. or upwards in two or more different dioceses, his Will must be proved, or in case there is no Will, letters of administration must be applied for, in the prerogative court of the archbishop, so called from the circumstances above mentioned. These, however, are circumstances which depend on the peculiar situation of the de- ceased's affairs, and concerning which the executor or administrator will always be properly instructed by those whose interest it is not to mislead him. 6. THE executor or administrator must imme- diately proceed to make an inventory or catalogue of all the personal estate, goods, and effects of the deceased whatever; as well those in his possession, viz. ready money, money in the funds, goods, chattels, stock on farm or in trade, &c. as ,also all debts owing to the deceased, and all securities for money, which are by the law called things in action, (as distinguished from things in absolute possession) and other valuable property whatever ; and in short every thing which belonged to the deceased, and which he has or might have devised ; which inventory the executor or administrator is to deliver in to the Ordinary, upon oath, whenever he is thereto lawfully required. This inventory he ought immediately and correctly to make, in order to shew what effects of the deceased he in fact ever has the possession .of; as on neglect of so doing be is liable to be charged with the payment of all debts and legacies, and subjects himself besides to the imputation of .'having embezzled the estate of the deceased. In this inventory, the executor is not to include the necessary wearing apparel of the widow (if any) ; she being entitled to retain that, and also such watches, rings, and jewels, ( 111 ) jewels, as she used to wear in her husband's life time, and as are undisposed of by his Will: These are called her paraphernalia, and (unless on a de- ficiency in the husband's estate, in which case they must be included in the inventory) are not liable, however valuable they may be, to answer his debts, and are to be reserved to the widow in preference to all legacies. It has even been determined, that a husband cannot by his Will dispose of such jewels of his wife, as are suitable to her rank and situation. The value of the goods and effects should also be specified in this inventory, although this is not binding on the executor or administrator, nor is it very much regarded at the common law ; for if it is too high, it shall not be prejudicial to him ; and if it is too low, he shall reap no advantage from it : but the real value of them is to be found by a jury, whenever it may come in question, on any dispute whether the executor has fully administered*, or has any effects left in his hands, or not. The time for exhibiting this inventory to the Ordinary is left entirely to him, and he may excuse the making or exhibiting it for a reasonable cause, as where it may be expedient that the- quantity and value of the effects should not be divulged. When ex- hibited in the ecclesiastical court, the inventory must be written on a stamp, [For a form, see the Appendix, No. VIII.] Sometimes, before the granting, or at least before the issuing, of the letters of administration, or probate of the Will, instead of this inventory cf the goods of the deceased, upon the oath of the executor or administrator, the judge of the eccle- siastical court, at the request of some person having interest, issues a commission for the appraisement and true valuation of the goods, rights, and credits, and inspection of the bonds, leases., and other securities and papers whatsoever, concerning the personal estate of the deceased, at the house of the deceased, or elsewhere, wherever his effects may be. But this is done only in extraordinary cases of great moment. 7. THE Executor or Administrator is to col- lect together and get in all the estate and effects so inventoried ; and to that end he has very large powers and interests conferred on him by law ; being the representative of the deceased, and having the same property in and right to his goods as the deceased had when living, and the same remedies to recover them. If there are two or more executors, a sale of goods, or on acquittance for a debt, or any act done by one of them, shall be good against all the rest ; the Testator having, by appointing them, placed an equal confidence in each of them. ' But in the case of administrators it is otherwise ; it being necessary they should all join in doing any act relative to the estate of the deceased ; the power granted them being only to them jointly, and not separately. Whatever is so recovered and got into the hands of the executor or administrator, which is of a saleable nature, and which can be converted into ready money, is called assets (from the French word assez) in his hands, that is* sufficient or enough to make him chargeable to creditors and legatees, to pay them their debts and legacies, so far as the value of such goods and effects extends, in the proportions and according, to the rules after men- tioned ; and he may convert them into money, in order to satisfy such demands. And in case one possessed of an estate for another's life dies with- out leaving any heir to take such estate, it shall come to his. executors or administrators, in whose hands it shall be liable to the payment of debts onfy, only, and not kgacies. But if there is any heir, it will then (under the statute of 29 Car. 2. c. 3.) be liable in his hands to all such debts as are chargeable on the real estate. The method and rules therefore of such payment are next to be taken into consideration. The executor or administrator must pay the debts of the deceased ; an d in payment of these he is bound to observe the rules of law, which give a preference to them accordingly as they are dif- ferently secured ; otherwise, on any future de- ficiency of effects, if the executor or administrator pays debts of a lower degree first, he will be ob- liged to answer those of a higher nature out of rjis own estate. First, then, he may pay all necessary funeral charges, and the expences attendant on proving the Will, or granting letters, of adminis- tration,* which latter, as has been before said, is necessary with respect to an administrator, to give him power to act. Secondly, he must pay debts due to the King, on record or specialty. Thirdly, such debts as are by particular acts of parliament directed to be preferred to others , as the for- feitures for not burying in woollen (if any), money due from an overseer of the poor for rates collected by him and not paid, and for letters to the post- office. Fourthly, debts of record due from the deceased to private persons, as money due upon judgments -, (if regularly docketed, or entered ac- cording to the directions of an act of 4 and 5 W. and M. c. 20 ;) money due under a decree in Chancery; statutes and recognizances, being a par- * For the expence of probates and letters of administration, and the stamps necessary for the discharge of legacies, see Appendix, No. IX. and No. XL I ticular ( II-* ) ticular sort of security on the estate, entered into by the deceased ; and in this class are also in- cluded mortgages; all which debts shall carry interest to the time of payment, as do also debts due on bond. Fifthly, debts due from the deceased on special contracts, as for rent; (but for which the landlord has often a better remedy in his own hands, by distraining on the premises); or upon bonds and covenants under seal. Lastly, debts on simple contracts ; that is, upon notes unsealed, and verbal promises, as well where the deceased has really promised, as where the law will imply that he has, as for goods bought, &c. Among these simple contracts, servants wages are by many, with great reason, preferred to all others, and it was in fact an absolute rule of our ancient law so to do-. Among debts of equal degree, the executor or administrator is allowed to pay himself his whole debt first, by retaining in his hands so much as his debt amounts to. But he is obliged to pay all debts of a higher nature before he can retain his own of an inferior one ; being only allowed this privilege against such as have no better security than himself. But an executor of his own wrong is not allowed to retain his own debt, for this might tend to encourage creditors to strive who should first take possession of the goods of the de- ceased, and would besides be taking advantage of his own illegal act, which is contrary to a rule of law. If a creditor appoints one who is his debtor to be his executor, the debt is discharged, whe- ther the executor acts or not j provided there are effects enough besides to pay all the Testator's debts : for though this discharge of the debt shall, in this case, take place of all legacies, yet it would be unfair to defraud the Testator's creditors of their just debts, by a release which is absolutely volun- tary tary, and without any consideration. If no suit is commenced against the executor or administrator for any debt due from the deceased, he may pay any one creditor in equal degree his whole debt, though he should in consequence have nothing left for the rest ; for without a suit commenced, the executor or administrator has no legal notice of the debt ; (except debts due on record, which he is bound to take notice of without suit.) It is also necessary that an executor should be attentive to the application of the different funds of a Testator's estate in payment of his different debts ; so that he may not pay the personal debts out of the real estate, or on the contrary pay debts which are a charge on the real estate only, out of the personal effects. On this head therefore it is to be remembered by the executor, that the personal estate of a Testator shall in all cases be, in the first place, applied in discharge of his personal debts or general legacies, unless he does, as he may, by express words or manifest intention exempt it. As every loan creates a personal debt from the borrower, whether there be any bond or covenant for payment or not, the personal estate shall be in the first place liable to answer such debts by loan, although such per- sonal debt be also secured by mortgage. But , where the charge is on the real estate principally, or in the first instance, although there be a collateral personal security, there the real estate shall be in the first place answerable ; as it shall be where the debt, though personal in its creation, was originally contracted by another. With respect to the priority of application of the real estates of a Testator in payment of his debts, when the personal estate is not sufficient to pay, or is exempted from such payment, it seems that in the first place the executor fhall apply the real I 2 estate estate expressly devised for payment of debts; secondly, to the extent of specialty debts, the real estate descended ; thirdly, the real estate specifi- cally devised, subject to a general charge of debts, It being the object of a court of equity that every claimant upon the effects of a person deceased shall be satisfied, as far as such effects can by any management, consistent with the nature of the respective claims, be applied in satisfaction thereof, it has been determined in Chancery that where one claimant has more than one fund to resort to and another claimant has only one, the first claim- ant shall resort to that fund on which the second has no claim : If therefore a specialty creditor, whose debt is a charge on the real estate, is paid out of the personal estate, a simple contract creditor shall stand in his place against the real effects, so far as the amount of such specialty creditor's debt. So where lands are subjected to payment of all debts, a legatee shall stand in the place of a simple contract creditor, who has been paid out of the personal estate; for such creditor might have come upon the real estate, and left the personal estate open to the claims of the legatee. Where a Testator is very much indebted, and the effects are not sufficient to pay every one their full demand, and the executor is desirous to be rid cf the estate, but is afraid of many disputes and con- troversies for priority among the creditors ; his safest way is to file a bill in Chancery against all the creditors ; in order that they may, if they please, contest each others debts, and dispute who ought to be preferred in payment ; and on a decree ob- tained, the executor will be fullv justified in pay- ing them according to the directions given thereby. Difficulties having arisen to creditors in recover- ing their debts in cases where the executor was out of the kingdom, the legislature thought proper to pass an Act of Parliament, 38 Geo. 3. c. 87. by which ( H7 ) which it was enacted, that if at the expiration of twelve months from a Testator's decease, the exe- cutor to whom probate has been granted fhall re- side out of the jurisdiction of the English courts of justice, any creditor may obtain a special adminis- tration , on a stamp of only 5s. The Creditor applying for such administration shall take the oath, and the administration shall be granted in the form, stated in the Act: and which is copied in the Appendix to this book, No. XII. The creditor then proceeds to exhibit his bill in a court of equity, to be paid his demand out of the Testator's effects ; and the court are authorised by the Act to appoint persons to collect the out- standing debts, and any money in the funds be- longing to the estate of the deceased may be trans- ferred into the name of the Accountant General in Chancery, in trust for such purposes as the court shall direct. If the executor returns to reside within the jurisdiction of the court, he must then be made a party to the suit, 8. WHEN the debts are all discharged, the legacies are next to be attended to ; and which are to be paid by the executor or administrator, so far as the effects which remain after payment of the debts will extend ; but he may not give himself the preference in this case, as he may in the case of debts. A Legacy is a gift or bequest of goods, money, or other effects by will ; and the person to whom it is given is in law called the legatee ; which every person is capable of being, unless particu- larly disabled by the common law or statutes ; as traitors, popish recusants convict, and some others j such chiefly as have been formerly mentioned as incapable of making Wills. The bequest transfers an imperfect property in the thing devised to the I 3 legatee 5 legatee ; but the legacy is not perfect without the consent of the executor : for if I have a general or peculiar legacy left me of one hundred pounds, or a specific one of a piece of plate, I cannot in either case take it without the consent of the executor. For all the effects of the deceased are by the Will and probate vested in the executor ; and it is his business in the first place to see whether there is a sufficient fund to pay the debts of the Testator: the rule of law and equity both being that a man must be just before he is permitted to be generous. And in case there should not be effects sufficient to pay both debts and legacies, all the general legacies must then abate proportionably, in order to pay the debts ; but a specific legacy (that is, a bequest of a piece of plate, a horse, or the like) is not to abate at all or allow any thing, unless the whole of the effects are insufficient to pay the debts; In which case no respect is paid to any legacies whatever, but all must abate in proportion. Upon the same principle it is, that if the legatees have been paid their legacies, they are obliged to refund in equal proportions, in case debts should after- wards happen to appear to an amount larger than the residue of the estate after the legacies paid. And an executor is not bound to pay a legacy without taking security from the legatee that he will refund in case of necessity ; if the executor has reason to expect he may in future be called on for debts not known at the time of paying the legacy. Legacies being gratuities and no duties, an action at law cannot be maintained for their re- covery. The proper remedy is by bill in Chan- cery against the executor, who is considered as a trustee for the legatee in respect of his legacy, and who may in that case be compelled to give security for a legacy payable at a future day, or to bring the fund from which it is payable into court. If If a person, being indebted to another, by his Will gives his creditor a legacy, equal in value to, or more than, the amount of the debt, without mentioning or taking any notice of the debt, this Jegacy shall generally be considered as a satisfac- tion of any debt due at the time of making the Will ; and the legatee shall not be paid both the debt and the legacy, because, as has been before remarked, the law supposes a man will be just before he is generous. Yet, notwithstanding this general doctrine, if the Testator leaves sufficient effects, and clearly shews his intention to be that his creditor shall have a legacy beside his debt, the legacy shall take effect ; and such legacy shall in no case be deemed a satisfaction for any debt accruing due after the time of making the. Will, because it cannot be supposed that the Testator could have such future debt in contemplation ; nor if the legacy is less than the debt, shall it be taken as a proportionable satisfaction, but the legatee shall be paid both. Where a legacy is given to a creditor upon a contingency which may or may not happen (and the not happening of which prevents the Jegacy from taking effect), or where it is not made payable immediately on the Testator's death, such legacy is no satisfaction of a debt, even though the contiiv gency on which it is payable takes place, and the legacy thereby becomes due ; because a debt, which is a certain duty, shall not be lost by an uncertain and contingent recompence ; for whatr ever is to be a satisfaction of a debt, ought to be so at the moment it is given, which such contingent or proviiional legacy is not. These rules are also applied to the cases of legacies given to a wife, children, or other relations entitled to marriage portions, or other provisions, under a settlement made bv a testator previous to his Will. I 4- W T here ( 120 ) r Where a person being indebted to another, makes him his executor, and gives him a legacy, as it is possible that such legacy may prevent the executor from being entitled to the residue (if any) of the estate, it shall not operate also as a satis- faction of his debt, but he may retain and pay himself both. 9. IN general, where the legatee dies before the Testator, or before the condition upon which the legacy is given be performed, the legacy be- comes a lost or lapsed legacy, and shall sink into the residue of the estate, as if the Sequest had never been made. [.4s in the case of land } see before^page 13, 14.] Thus where one bequeathed money to trustees, in trust for a daughter till she should attain 21 years of age, and then to pay the same to her ; and if such daughter should die under 21, leaving a child or children, then in trust for them; but if she died under 21, without children, then in trust for the Testator's niece; the daughter attained 21, married, had two children, and died in the life-time of the Testator ; it was determined that the daughter's children took nothing by the Will. But if a man by his Will gives 1001. a-piece to his children, payable at their respective ages of twenty -one years, and directs that if any of them die before twenty-one, then the legacy given to the child so dying shall go to the surviving children-, and one of the children dies in the father's life time, though the rule is, that where the legatee dies in the life-time of the Testator, his legacy shall lapse, yet it only means that it shall lapse as to the legatee himself so dying ; and that wherever, as in this case, the legacy is further devised or given over after the death of the legatee to other persons in being, it immediately, on the death of the legatee, vests in them, and it shall not be in the power of anv any court to divest or call it back a^ain. And in all cases a bequest may be so specially framed as to prevent the death of the legatee from causing a lapse of the legacy. If a contingent legacy is left to any one, that is, such a legacy, the payment of which depends on some chance mentioned by the Testator, as when the legatee attains, or if he attains, the age of twenty-one, and he dies before attaining that age, though after the death of the Testator, this is also a lapsed legacy. But a legacy or bequest to any one, to be paid when he attains the age of twenty- one years, is what the law calls a vested legacy ; that is, an interest which commences at the death of the Testator, although it is not to be paid till some future time.- And in this case, though the legatee dies before that age, his representatives shall receive it out of theTestator's personal estate, at the time at which it would have become payable in case the legatee had lived. This distinction is borrowed from the civil law, and has been adopted in our courts, not so much on account of its in- trinsic equity, as of its having been before adopted by the ecclesiastical courts. For as the court of Chancery has a concurrent jurisdiction with them, in regard to the .recovery of legacies, it is but reasonable that the subject should have the same measure of justice in whatever court he sues. But \vhere such contingent legacies are charged upon land, in both the above cases they shall lapse, and be lost to the representatives of the legatee, for the benefit of the heir. And the reason of this latter difference is, that with respect to devises charged upon lands, the ecclesiastical court has no concur- rent jurisdiction, as they have in regard to personal Estate. This doctrine of the lapsing of contingent lega- icies has been the subject of much contest. In general ( 122 ) general where a legacy, payable at a future time, is charged upon personal estates only, if the person entitled to it dies before the time of payment, his personal representative will be entitled to it. On the other hand, where a legacy is charged upon real estate, if the person entitled to it dies before the time of payment, it sinks into the land, for the benefit of the owner of the inheritance. The latter rule has been considered as applicable to the case of a mixed fund, consisting both of real and per- sonal estate. This rule has however in some cases been de- parted from ; and, perhaps, the general rule, as it now stands, is, That when a legacy is given, charged upon a real or mixed estate, and payable at a future time, and there are no express \vords in the Will to make it immediately a vested interest, there (if a stronger implication to the contrary does not arise from the other parts of the Will) its being so charged, and so payable, will be considered as circumstances amounting to an implication that the Testator's intention was, that it should not rest till the time it was made payable. It is in the Testator's power (by express words in his Will, showing his intention) to make a legacy vested and transmissible, though charged upon a real or mixed estate, and payable at a future time. And there seems little doubt that this may be equally done by implication. Therefore if there are any circumstances or expressions in a Will, from which the implication, that it was the Testator's intention to make a legacy immediately vested, is stronger than the implication of law to the contrary, which arises from its being charged upon a real or mixed fund, and payable at a future day, the legacy is in that case to be considered as a vested or transmis- sible interest, and paid by the executor to the personal representatives of the deceased legatee. In ( 123 ) In all these cases of legacies which are thus vested on the Testator's death, though payable at a future day, where they are charged on land, or consist of money in the funds, both of which yield an immediate and constant profit, interest shall be paid on them to the legatee from the Testator's death to the time of payment. But if the legacies are charged only on the personal estate generally, which cannot be immediately got in, they shall then carry interest only from the end of one year after the death of the Testator; which time the ex- ecutor or administrator is allowed to settle his affairs in. If a father devises legacies or portions to his daughters or younger children, to be paid or pay- able at their respective ages of 21 years, or any other time certain, without making any provision for their maintenance in the mean time, and die ; in this case, they shall have interest for their por- tions from fiis death till paid, because the father was obliged to have provided for them if he had lived; but if such portions had been devised to them by a stranger, to be paid or payable at such an age, their legacies should not carry interest in the mean time, because he, being a stranger, was under no such obligation to provide tor them. When a legacy is given to one conditionally only, as in case he do or omit any particular act, the legacy is not due or payable until the condition is performed; and therefore if the legatee dies before performance of it, the legacy is in general extin- guished. Where a legacy of money or other personal estate is given to one who is an infant (under twenty-one years of age) at the Testator's decease, without appointing the legatee's age of twenty-one years, or any other certain time, for the payment of it} this legacy cannot be paid before the legatee is (-124 ) is "twenty-one years old, he not being capable before that time of giving the. executor a legal discharge for the same. It is often the course for executors in such instances to pay the father or guardian of the infant the legacy, in order to dis- burden themselves of the trouble of the executor- ship. This can only be safely done, where such parent or guardian, being a person in good cir- cumstances, will sufficiently indemnify the executor by bond against any future demand of the legacy by the infant, who is entitled to payment of the same from the executor when he comes of age, notwithstanding such former payment to his father or guardian, 10. WHEN all the debts, and!, in case of any Will, all the legacies given by such Will, are dis- charged, the surplus or residue must be paid to the residuary legatee, if any is appointed by the Will. And if no residuary legatee is named, it was long a settled notion that the undevised surplus devolved to the executor, for his own use, by virtue of his executorship. Whatever ground there might have formerly been for this opinion, it is. now to be understood with this restriction ; that although where the executor has no legacy at all given him by the Will, the undevised residue, after payment of debts and legacies, shall generally be his own, yet wherever there is sufficient on the face of the Will, from which it may be implied that the Testator did not intend his executor should have it, the residue of the estate thus undevised shall be distributed among the next of kin to the Testator. Many questions have been made as to this right of the executor to the undevised residue ; for by law the appointment of an executor vests in him, for his own benefit, all the personal estate of the Testator, ( 125 ) Testator, not otherwise disposed of. Where he is expressly named an executor in tnisf, or where any other expressions occur shewing the office only* to be intended him, and not the beneficial interest, an executor shall be considered only as a trustee for the benefit of the next of kin. So he shall, where, though there is a residuary clause, the name of the residuary legatee is not inserted, or where the re- siduary legatee dies in the life-time of theTestator. A pecuniary or specific legacy also to a sole execu- tor excludes him from the undevised residue ; and equal pecuniary legacies to two or more executors exclude them both; and it makes no difference though the executor is the wife or next of kin of the deceased. In all these cases an executor will stand upon exactly the same footing as an administrator; who, where there is a Will, is bound to distribute the residue, after payment of debts and legacies, ac- cording to the rules laid down in Chapter VI. among the next of kin to the deceased ; and, where there is no Will, the whole effects of the deceased, after payment of his debts, are to be distributed in the same manner. But wherever the legacy to an executor is con- sistent with the intent that he should take the whole, a Court of Equity will not deprive him of that which is his legal right ; and therefore, where the gift to the executor is only an exception out of another legacy, it shall not exclude him from the undevised residue, "because it is necessary to make such exception expressly. So a legacy to one only, of two or more executors, shall exclude neither from such undevised residue; because theTestator might intend to such a one a preference, to the amount of such legacy. The same rule and reason hold wiiere several executors have unequal pecu- niary legacies ; in which cases they shall divide the ( 126 > the residue equally between them. As to specific legacies, it is determined that a specific legacy will exclude a sole executor from the residue ; but that distinct specific legacies of unequal value shall not exclude two or more executors. No case has been yet determined that distinct specific legacies, of equal value, to several executors, should exclude them from the undevised residue ; but in such a case, most probably, Courts of Equity would in- cline in favour of the next of kin : for specific and pecuniary legacies have generally been con- sidered in such courts as standing precisely on the same ground, in questions of this nature. None of these observations apply to the case of an executor having a legacy, and being also ap- pointed a residuary legatee : In this case he shall take the benefit of both devises according to the express will of the Testator. APPENDIX. ( 127 ) APPENDIX. INTRODUCTION TO THE FOLLOWING FORMS OF WILLS. jnL MAN's whole property is by the law divided into real and personal estate. Real estates consist of freehold lands, tenements, houses, &c. Personal, of leasehold lands, money, goods, chattels, and the like. All freehold estates, for the several kinds of which, see before, page , are called real estates, as are also (in many respects) copyhold estates, which descend to the heir at law, if not bequeathed by Will. Leasehold terms of years in land, though ever so long, as for 500 or 1000 years, are part of the personal estate, and go as the rest of the personal estate to the executor or administrator. It may perhaps be objected, that the forms of Wills here given are short and few. To this we answer, that one general precedent will include a variety of particular cases ; and also that we have in these forms, as in the whole work, avoided running into subtleties and niceties, and have therefore omitted any long and tedious forms of difficult entails, contingent remainders, and executory devises ; ( 128 ) devises ; these not being ever necessary or required, but in the devising and settling of large and extensive pro- perty, and for which it might be as well unsafe as difficult, to lay down certain precedents. Where the estate is of so much value as to demand such settlement, 'it is right that every one should consult those who are capable of advising them, and who must necessarily be informed of all the particular circumstances, which cannot be foreseen or provided for by general rules. We also refer our reader to the beginning of the fifth chapter, in which we have endeavoured to give some slight idea of those difficult and abstruse subjects. NUMBER ( 129 ) NUMBER I. Form of a last Will and Testament, disposing of Goods, Money, and personal Effects, and not containing any Devise of Lands. IN THIS WILL ARE BEQUESTS r. To the Poor of the Parish. 2. To the Testator's Children. 3. And to Grandchildren: the Money to be invested in the Funds, to be paid them at the Age of twenty-one Tears, or Days of Mar- riage, with Interest in the mean Time for their Maintenance. 4. A De-vise to a Man, of Part of a Debt owing from him to the Testator. 5 . A Devise of Household Goods to the Wife for Life, and after her Death to the Son. 6. Devise of the Residue, And 7. Appointment of the Wife to be Executrix. IN the Name of God, Amen. I John Mills, of Cheapside, in the parish of Saint Mary le Bow, in the city of London, linen-draper, 1 being of sound and disposing mind, memory, and understanding, 2 but mindful of my mortality, do this loth day of March, in the year of our Lord I785, 3 make and publish this my last Will and Testament, in manner and form fol- lowing: That is to say, First, I desire to be decently and privately buried in the church-yard belonging to the parish in which I shall happen to die, without any funeral pomp, and with as little expence as may be ; 1. and I give and bequeath unto the poor of such parish the sum of lol. to be diilributed in such proportions and manner as my executrix, herein after named, shall 2. think fit. Also, I give and bequeath unto my eldest son, John Mills, the sum of 500!. Also, I give and bequeath unto my second son, William Mills, the like sum of 500!. Also, I give and bequeath unto my See the Notes at the end referred to by this and the other figures in the Will. K daughter, ( 130 ) Daughter, Mary Roe, the like sum of ool. The said several and respeftiver legacies to be paid unto them severally and respectively; immediately after the ex- 3. piration of one year after my decease. Alfo, I give to my three grand-daughters, Sarah, Catherine, and Mary, children of my said daughter, Mary Roe, the sum of i col. each. And I do desire that the said several sums of jool. shall, within the space of one month after my deceafe, be. placed and invested in some or one of the public funds of this kingdom, at the discretion of my executrix, hereinafter named ; and that the .said several sums of lool. or the 'funds or securities to be purchased therewith, shall be paid and transferred to my said grand-daughters respectively, when and as they shall severally and respectively attain their several and re- spective ages of twenty-one years, or day or days of. marriage, which shall first happen ; and that the in- terest accruing and arising therefrom, in the mean time, shall be applied towards their education and maintenance respectively until they shall severally and respectively attain their said -ages, or day or days of marriage as aforesaid : and in case any or either of them the said Sarah, Catherine, and Mary, shall happen to die before her or their attaining their said age of twenty-one years, and unmarried, then I give the share of her or them so dying, unto the survivors or survivor of them ; and if all my said grand-daughters shall happen to die before attaining the age of twenty- one years, and unmarried, then I give and bequeath the whole of the said several sums of loci, making in the whole the sum of 300!. unto my said daughter 4. Mary, if she. shall be then living. 4 And whereas John Doe, of Fleet-street, London, barber, is indebted to me in the sum of 200!. principal money, upon bond : now I do hereby give, forgive, and release unto the said John Doe, the sum of lool. part of the said sum of 200!. and do hereby will and direct that my execu- trix, hereinafter named, do excuse and 'release tha 5. said sum of lool. to him. Also I give to my wife, Mary Mills, the use of all my plate, houshold goods, and furniture whatsoever, which shall be in my dwel- ling-house at the time of my death, during her life- time ; and after her decease, I give the same to my son, John Mills, his executors, administrators, and assigns. 6. assigns. And as to all the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate whatsoever and wheresoever, and of what nature, kind, and quality soever the same may be, and not herein before given and disposed of, after payment of my debts, legacies, funeral expences, and the ex- pence of proving this my will, I clo htreby give and bequeath the same, being all personal, unto my dear wife, the said Mary Mills, her executors, administra- tors, and arfigns, to and for her and their own use and 7. benefit absolutely; and I do hereby make, ordain, constitute, and appoint my said wife, Mary Mills, sole executrix s of this my list Will and Testament, hereby revoking all former and other Wills and Testaments by me at any time heretofore made. In witness whereof I have to this my last Will and Testament set and subscribed my hand and seal, the day and ; year first above written. y -, J ofin Signed, sealed, published, and declared by the said Testator, John Mills, as and for his last Will and Testament, in the presence *of us, who at his request, in his presence, and in the presence of each other, 6 subscribed our names as witnesses thereto.* JoJm Denn, Richard Fenn." 1 * If a duplicate, or other part of the Will, is executed at the same time, say, " As we have likewise done to a duplicate of the above written Will " at the same time." Notes and Observations on the foregoing necessary to be attended to. 1 THE Testator, or person making the Will, should be careful to make such a description of himself as may avoid any confusion or uncertainty, every Will being to be registered among a variety of others, and many persons K 2 being ( 183 ) feeing concerned and interested therein. This description is in law called his " addition" After the place of abode it is necessary, as here, to add the trade, occupation, or profession. Single women, never married, use the ad- dition of "spinster;" widows, that of "widow," which are sufficient, without mentioning any trade or business, though they may exercise such. It is still more necessary to be exact in the description of the legatees, in order to prevent any mistakes with respect to them.* 2 " Of sound and disposing mind, &c." This being a circumstance absolutely necessary to the validity of Wills, it is right that it should be recognized in every Will by the Testator himself. 3 The date is necessary on a variety of accounts. See page 12 14. As it is not usual to date legal instruments on a Sunday, it has been thought that if a Will is made on that day, it would be right to date it on the preceding day ; but this might be attended with great inconvenience on queflions of insanity, and in other cases ; and it is therefore right to date it on the day it is actually made. 4 In this case, if the grand-daughters should all die under age and unmarried, and the daughter to whom the legacies are in such case given over, should not be living at their death, they would fall into and become part of the residue of the estate, and go to the residuary legatee (in this case the wife) or her personal representative, 5 'A woman is called an execurmr, but the whole law of executors applies to her ; and that, as has been men- tioned in page 23, 24, though she is a married woman. * If a married woman, as is sometimes the case, makes a Will, in consequence of a settlement or agreement, the Will should begin in the following form : " I Mary Roe, wife of Richard Roe, of Islington, in the county of " Middlesex, Esquire, do by this my writing, purporting to be my last " Will and Testament, dispose of my estate and effects, pursuant and *' according to the authority to me given and reserved in and by a deed " of settlement made on my marriage with the said Richard Roe, bearing " date (and setting out the date of and parties to the settlement, if " kno\vn) and by virtue of the said deed, and of all other powers and " authorities whatsoever to me given or reserved, in manner as follow.-; ** That ii to say, I give," &c, as in other Wills, 6 Though, ( 133 j c Though, as has been before mentioned, page , it is not absolutely requisite that the execution of Wills of goods, money, and personal estate, should be as formal as is here prescribed, yet it is the safest way, and that all the circumstances in Italics should concur. 7 Two witnesses are sufficient to a Will of personal estate. When the person making the Will executes it, he must, in the presence of the witnesses, write his name opposite the seal, (or if he has previously written it, he must acknowledge it to be his writing.) If he cannot write, he must make his mark, and then say to the witnesses, " I publish and declare this as my lail Will, and desire you to witness it." K 3 NUMBER ( 134 ) NUMBER II.* Form of a Will disposing of Lands only ; containing, X. A Devise of Freehold Lands to one in Fee Simple. 2. A De-vise of other Lands to one in Tail ; and an Executory Devise t* another in Fee Simple. 3. A Devise of Copyhold Lands. 4. A Devise of Freehold Lands to one in Tail 5. Devises to Tenants in common aud Joint-tenant}. 6' A Devise of the Residue. THIS is the last Will and Testament of me John Doe, of Fleet-street, in the city of London, gen- tleman, being of sound and disposing mind, memory, j. and understanding. First, I give, devise, and bequeath unto Richard Roe the younger, of Fleet-street afore- said, gentleman, all those my freehold messuages, lands, tenements, hereditaments, and premises, with the appurtenances, whereof I am seised in fee, situate, lying, and being at Cheshunt, in the county of Hert- ford, and now or late in the several tenures or occu- pations of John Mills, &c. (mentioning the naircs of the tenants of the premises) or some or one of them, their or some or one of their under-tenants, or assigns, to have and to hold all and every the said lands, tene-r ments, and hereditaments, with the appurtenances, situate as aforesaid, to him the said Richard Roe, 2. his hens and assigns for ever. 1 Also, I give, devise, and bequeath to my second son, William Doe, all that my freehold farm, lands, and premises, situate at Cheshunt aforesaid, and now in the possession of Richard Fcnn, as tenant thereof to me, to hold the same farm, lands, and premises, unto my said son, William Doe, and the heirs of his body ; 2 but in case ray said son shall die without leaving heirs of his body, * Sec the notes on this Number, page 156. then ( 135 ) then I give, devise, and bequeath the said farm, lands, and premises, tj my daughter, Mary Doe, her heirs 3. and assigns, for ever. Also, I give and bequ^.ih unto William Thomas, of Islington, in the county of Mid- dlesex, Esquire,' all those my copyhold lands, mes- suages, tenements, and hereditaments, and which I have surrendered to the use of my Will, 3 situate, lying, and being at Enfield, in the county of Middle- sex, and which now are, or lately were, in the tenure or occupation of Edward Reeves, his under-tenants or assigns ; to have and to hold the said copyhold lands, messuages, and tenements, to the said William Tho- mas, his heirs and assigns, for ever, according to the custom of the manor of which the same are holden. 4. And I do hereby give, devise, and bequeath unto my said son, William Doe, all those my four freehold messuages or dwelling-houses, situate in Fleet-street, London, aforesaid, being Nos. 106, 107, 108, and 109, and now being in the several tenures or occupations of, &c. (mentioning the tenants names) to have and to hold the same to my said son, William Doe, and to the heirs of his body, lawfully begotten, or to be begotten. 4 5. Also I give, devise, and bequeath unto John Dem?, of Cheapside, London, mercer, and Richard Fenn, of Fleet-street, London, aforesaid, linen-draper, all that my freehold estate, farm, lands, and premises, whereof I am seised in fee, situate, lying, and being at Hack- ney, in the county of Middlesex, and now in the tenure or occupation of Henry Roberts, as tenant to me of the same, under a lease for twenty-one years, from Lady-day, 1783, to have and to hold the same estate, farm, lands, and premises, with the appurte- nances, unto the said John Denn and Richard Fenn, [their heirs and assigns for ever, as tenants in com- mon and not as joint-tenants.] If It Is intended to make the devisees joint-tenants, the words of the devise are to be exactly similar till the beginning of the brackets, and then* instead of the words inserted between thcrn^ say [and the survivor of them, his heirs and assigns for ever, as 6. joint-tenants, and not as tenants in common.] > And as to all the rest, residue, and remainder of my real and copyhold estates whatsoever, and wheresoever the same may be situate, lying, and being, I do hereby give, devise, and bequeath the same to mv K 4 fuid ( 136 ) said son, William Doe, to have and to hold the same to my said son William Doe, his heirs and assigns, for ever. In witness whereof I the said John Doe have, to this my last Will and Testament, set and sub- scribed my hand and seal, the 2oth day of March, in the year of our Lord 1783. Signed, sealed, &c. (as in the attestation to No. I.) To be executed in the presence Jhn Doe. of, and signed by three wit- nesses. See page 8, &c. Notes and Observations referred to in No. II. 1 " To the said R. D. his heirs and assigns for ever." These are the plain and simple words which convey to a man the fee-simple or entire property in freehold lands or houses, without a possibility of dispute or misunder- standing. See further, page 47, 48. a " And the heirs of^ his body ; but" &c. By these words an estate-tail is given to the son, in the lands, and by the words immediately following, the lands are given, by an executory devise,' to the daughter in fee. See page 5 7 to 63. In addition to what is said in Chapter V. on Executory Devises, it is now necessary to state, that by an act passed during the last session of parliament, 39 and 40 G. 3. c. 98, (generally called The Executory Devise Act], no person can by deed or Will settle or dispose of any real or personal property, so as that the rents or profits shall be accumulated for a longer term than the life of the fettler; or 2 1 years after his decease ; or during the mi- nority of any person living at his decease ; or during the minorities of persons beneficially entitled. 3 As ( 137 ) 3 As to the necessity and effect of this surrender of copyhold estates, see page 62, 63. 4 This is a devise of an estate tail to the son -, for an explanation of which see page 52. 5 These several forms of words will avoid all ambiguity in devises of lands to two or more persons, and will clearly shew what estate the Testator intends giving. See pages 36 and 50. N. B. Where a Will contains devises of lands only, there is no occasion for the appointment of an executor, as is necessary in the case of personal estate ; and where no disposition is made by Will of such personal estate, the deceased is said, as to that, to die intestate, and it will be distributed according to the rules laid down in the last chapter of the work. In the word lands, leasehold estates are not meant or included, they being part of the personal estate, and to be disposed of or distributed ac- cordingly, unless the Testator has no lands but lease- holds; in which case the Will must operate on them or not at all. NUMBER ( 138 ) NUMBER III. Republication of the foregoing Will. For the Occasion, Reason and Effect of this Republi- cation, seepage n, &c. WHEREAS since the making and publishing of the above last Will and Testament of me the said John Doe, 1 have purchased divers freehold lands, messuages, tenements, hereditaments, and premises, situate in the several counties of Hertford and Mid- dlesex : Now I do hereby republish my said last Will and Testament, and do hereby declare that it is my desire and intention that the said Will and Testament shall be good and valid, to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been this day originally made and published ; any act, deed, matter, or thing whatsoever, by me heretofore done, committed, or omitted, to the contrary thereof in any wife notwithstanding. In wit- ness whereof I have hereunto set and subscribed my hand and seal, this ist day of May, in the year of our Lord 1784. Signed and sealed by the said Testator, John Doe, in the presence of us, who at his request, in his presence, =. s is and in the presence of each John Dae. other, have subscribed our names as witnesses to the above republication of his said last Will and Testa- ment. To be executed in the presence of, and signed by three witnesses, in the same manner as the original WilL NUMBER { 139 ) NUMBER IV. Form of a Will of personal Estate, containing, I. A Bequest of Money to a Wife provided for by Marriage Settlement* a. Bequest of Household Goods to her. 3 . Legacies to several Persons for Mourning. 4. Legacy to Executors for their Trouble. 5 . Devise of the Residue to Executors upon Trust, to invest the same in the public Funds, for the Bent/it of such Children as the Testator should leave at his Death ; the Interest to be applied towards their Maintenance and Education, and the Principal to be paid to the Males at twenty-one, and to the Females at that Age, or Day or Days of Marriage, with Benefit of Survivorship. In case of all their Deaths without Issue, th. Interest to the Wife for Life, and after her Death, ths Principal to be paid to the Testators Brothers and Sisters. 6. Devise of the Guardianship of Testator's Children to his Wife and Executors. 7. Appointment of Executors. 8. Clauses to Indemnify the Executors against all Expences and involun* tary Loss. 9. Revocation of all former Wills, and Conclusion. THIS is the 'ill and Testament of me John Smith, o . . parish of St. Ann, Aldersguie, in the c'ity of London, grocer, who am in health, and of '-<>'ind and disposing mind, memory, and under- g. First, I commend my soul into the hands .aighty God, who gave it, and my body I com- mit to the earth, to be decently and frugally interred, at the discretion of my executrix and executors herein after named ; and as to all my worldly estate what- soever and wheresoever, wherewith it may please God to bless me, being all personal, I give, devise, and bequeath the same, after payment of my funeral ex- pences, the expence of proving this my Will, and all my just debts, as herein after is mentioned : Whereas my dear wife, Mary Smith, is already sufficiently and handsomely handsomely provided for by settlement made on her at her marriage, and otherwise, yet notwithstanding the same, and in token of the great affection which I have for her, I gire and devise unto her my said dear wife, the said Mary Smith, the sum of 500!. of good and lawful money of Great Britain, to be paid to her within six months after my decease, to and for her I. own use and benefit. Also, I give and bequeath unto my said wife, the said Mary Smith, all and singular my household goods, books, plate, linen, china, fur- niture, and utensils whatsoever, in and belonging to my dwelling-house, to and for her own use and benefit ; and also the sum of 20 guineas for a ring and 3. mourning. Also I give unto my three sisters, Eliza- beth, Anne, and Jane Smith, and to my brother, Thomas Smith, the sum of 30 guineas each, for a 4. ring and mourning. Also, I give unto Robert Porter, of Chcapside, gentleman, and -William Symonds, of the same place, linen-draper, two of my executors and my trustees, herein after named, the sum of 50 guineas each, for the trouble they may have in exe- 5. cuting this my Will. And lastly, after payment of all my just debts as aforesaid, and of the legacies in. this my will contained, with the payment of all which 1 do hereby charge all my personal estate, I give and bequeath all and singular the rest, residue, and re- mainder of my estate and effects whatsoever and wheresoever, unto the said Robert Porter and William Symonds, and the survivor of them, and the executors and administrators of such survivor, upon trust, to sell and dispose of, collect and get in the same, and to invest the money arising from the said residue, in some or one of the public funds of this kingdom, in the names of them the said Robert Porter and William Symonds, or the survivor of them, or the executors or administrators of such survivor, upon the trusts, and to and for the uses, intents, and purposes herein after .declared, of and concerning the same ; (that is to say ;) upon trust, that they do and shall apply the dividends and interest of the said securities, so as aforesaid to be purchased, or so much of the same interest and dividends as shall, in the discretion of my said trustees, or the survivor of them, or the exe- CUtors or administrators of such survivor, be thought proper proper and necessary, in and upon the maintenance and education of all and every such child or children as I may happen to leave at my death, equally, share and share alike, until such or them as shall or may happen to be male's, shall respectively attain their age or ages of twenty-one years, and until such of them as may happen to be females shall respectively attain the said age of twenty-one years, or day or days of marriage, respectively, which shall first happen ; and when and as my said children shall respectively attain their said respective ages or days of marriage, then, upon trust, to pay, assign, and transfer the funds and securities in which the same residue shall have been so invested, equally unto and amongst all my children, who shall attain the said age, or day or days of mar- riage, immediately as they shall respectively attain the same ; and in case there shall be only one such child which shall attain that age, or marriage as afore- said, then, in trust, to pay the s,sme residue to such only child, if all my other children shall have died without issue. And in case any or either of the said children shall happen to die, such of them as shall be males, before he or they shall respectively attain his, her, or their age of twenty-one years, and without issue, and such of them as shall be females, before attaining the said age, or their day or days of marriage respectively, and without issue, then the parts or shares of him, her, or them so dying under age, un- married, and without issue, shall go to and amongst, and be in trust for the surviving child and children, and be equally divided between or among them, share and share alike, if more than one, and be payable when and as his, her, or their original parts or' shares shall by virtue of this my Will become payable ; and be liable to the same contingencies of surviving to and among the surviving child or children, in case of the death of any other of the said children in manner aforesaid, as I have herein before directed, concerning his, her, or their original parts or shares. But in case all the said children shall happen to die, such of them as shall be males, before they shall'attain the age of twenty-one years, and without issue, and such of them as shall be females, before attaining that age, or their days of marriage respectively, and without issue, then and 4 ( 142 ) and in such case, I will and direct, that the said Robert Porter and William Symonds, my said execu- tors, and the survivor of them, and the executors and administrators of such survivor, shall from thenceforth stand and be possessed of such residue, and the secu- rities so to be purchased therewith as aforesaid, and the dividends, interest, and produce thereof, to, for, and upon the following uses, trusts, intents, and pur- poses ; that is to su ; upon trust, to pay the interest, dividends, an-, produce of the said residue, unto my said loving wife, Mary Smith, and her assigns, during the term of her natural life, and her remaining my widow, sole and unmarrried, and from and after the death or marriage of my said wife, Mary Smith, and in case of all my said children dying, as aforesaid respectively, under age, unmarried, and without issue, then, and in such case* I give, devise, and bequeath the said residue, or the funds and securities in which the same shall have been invested, equally, share and share alike, unto and amongst my said sisters and brother, their executors, administrators, and assigns, 6. to and for their own use and benefit. And I do hereby devise the guardianship, care, and education of my said children during their minorities as afore- said, unto my said loving \vife, Mary Smith, and the said Robert Porter and William Symonds, and the survivors and survivor of them. But it is my will and desire, that the guardianship of my said wife shall cease on her marriage, and ceasing to remain my 7. widow. And I do hereby nominate, constitute, and appoint my said dear wife, the said Mary Smith, and the said Robert Porter and William Symonds, executrix and executors of this my last Will and Testament ; 8. Provided, and my will is, that mv said trustees, and executrix, and executors, herein before named, and the survivor of them, and the executors and adminis- trators of such survivor, shall and may at all times in the first place reimburse and indemnify themselves, herself, and himself respectively, and deduct and retain to themselves, herself, and himself respectively, out of the said trust premises respectively, all such costs, charges, damages, and expences, as they or either of them shall or may at any time expend, lay ut, and be put unto, for or by reason or means of all, anv, any, or either of the trusts hereby in them reposed ; and that neither of them shall be answerable for any loss which may happen to any of the said trust pre- mises, unless such loss happen through his, her, or their wilful neglect or default, nor one for the other or others of them, nor for more monies than shall actually come to each of their hands respectively; but each and every of them for his, her, and their o*vn acts, deeds, receipts, neglects, and defaults only; nor for any loss which shall or may happen by occasion of depositing any money in the hands, keeping, or custody of any public or common banker. And I do hereby revoke and make void all former and other Wills by me at any time heretofore made, and do declare these presents only to be and contain my last Will and Testament. In witness whereof I the said John Smith, the Testator, have to this my Will, con- tained in three sheets of paper, set my hand at the bottom of each of the two preceding sheets, and my hand and seal to this third and last sheet*, this loth day of May, in the year of our Lord 1784. Signed, sealed, &c. as in No. I. to be witnessed John Smith. by two witnesses. f ll . 8 ' 8, * See Page 8, 9. f In this, as in other cases where the Will exceeds one sheet, it is the regular way for the Wifnessf- to put their names at the bottom of the pre- ceding sheets, at the corner opposite to that where Uie Testator signs. NUMBER ( 144 ) NUMBER V. Form of a Will disposing both of real and personal Pro- perty, Lands, Money in the Funds, Leasehold Estates, &c. containing, l. A Formal Introduction. a. A Devise to Executors of jfoc/. Stock, in Trust to pay the Interest to Testator's Father during his Life, and after bis Death t9 transfer same to a Bret her of Testator's. 3. A Devise The above inventory, when exhibited in the ecclesiastical courts, must be stamped with a bs. aamp, pursuant to several Acts of Parliament. NUMBER ( 157 ) NUMBER IX. fjY the Acts of the 20 Geo. 3. c. 28; 23 Geo. 3. c. 58, and 29 G Will. But the wife, children, and grandchildren of the Testator, or Intestate, were exempted from the duties imposed by the latter acts, and were only chargeable with the following duties, viz. s. d. For any sum under 2o/ ..... o 2 6 Of 2o/. and under ioo7. .050 ioo7. and upwards ...... i o o So that they were not in any case subject to a higher stamp duty than i7. though the legacy given to them, or their share of the personal estate, might be considerably more than ICO/. The ( 158 ) The Act 36 Gfo. 3. r. 52, which imposed a per-centage stamp-duty on legacies to Collateral Relations and others, re- pealed the above stamps, as to those legacies only which were liable to such per-centage duty. The stamp therefore on lega- cies, &c. to a IFife, Children, and Grandchildren, remained as before, viz. from 2*. 6d. to \L\ which latter remained the highest legacy-stamp duty which such relations were liable to pay, for any sum. But by Act 45 Geo. 3. c. 28, the above-mentioned Act of 36 Geo. 3. c. 52, was repealed as far as regarded the amount of Duties, and the following duties imposed in lieu thereof, viz. On every Legacy, specific or pecuniary, of the amount or value of 2O/. or more ; and upon the clear Residue and every part of the clear Residue of the personal estate of any Testator or Inteftate, amounting to ioo/. or more, which shall be given or pass, 1. To children of the deceased or their descendants, i/. per cent. 2. To a brother or sister of the deceased ; or their descen- dants, 2/. IO5. per cent. 3. To a brother or sister of the deceased's father or mother ; or their descendants, 4/. per cent. " 4. To a brother or sister of the deceased's grandfather or grandmother, or their descendants, f/. per cent. 5. To any collateral relation or to a stranger in blood, io/. per cent. N. B. The husband or wife of the deceased is exempt from these duties. In order to enforce the payment of these duties, several regulations are made by these Acts; to which it behoves Executors and Administrators to be particularly attentive : the main scope and end of all the clauses being to compel the executors or administrators, and all trustees acting in the payment of legacies, to be personally answerable for the payment of the legacy-stamp. They must therefore at all times whenever they pay a legacy, or residue, or any part of it, take a Receipt, in the form, and containing the particulars, hereafter noticed : They must also, at the same time, deduct or retain the amount cf the stamp-duty; (unless it has been previously paid, or is otherwise pro- vided for in the Testator's Will ;) and, within twenty-one days, they must take the receipt to be stamped, and pay the ( 159 ) the duty on the amount of the legacy or residue contained in such receipt, to the Commissioners in Town, or the Receivers in the Country. In cases of the payment of annuities, or any yearly produce of a fund, Executors, &c. mull, on making the four payments which complete each year cf the first four years, take a like receipt, deduct the duty, and act in ail respects as they are directed with respect to other legacies. (See 8 of the Act, in pa. 160, 161). The receipts in all cases are liable to no stamp but the legacy- stamp. The following is the substance of the clauses of the Act, containing; these and other provisions. The Commissioners of Stamps are, as usual in other cases, to appoint Receivers of the duties in the several counties, &c. who are to receive the same, and to keep accounts, shewing the personal estates in respect of which the duties have been paid ; so that it may at all times appear, on their books, what payments have been made in respect of the personal estate of any Testator, Tes- tatrix/ or Intestate. 4, 1 he Commissioners are to provide printed forms of receipts, which may be used, or the form transcribed, by the executor, on any other paper not provided by the Commissioners. The following is the form of a receipt. STAMP-OFFICE. OX Account of the Personal Estate of John Denn, deceased, between John Doe, taking the Administration of the said Estate, and Richard Roe, Legatee, [or Next-of-kiu as the case may be.~\ of. S. d. Amount of the Sum [or Value if not in Money] ) ' accounted for ------ \ l Duty allowed, at the Rate of Two [or as the > j case may be] per cent. f Balance received - . 98 RECEIVED the 1st day of August, 1796, the above balance, in full, [or part, as the case may be] of my Legacy [or Share, as the case may be] out of the personal Estate above mentioned. Signed Richard Roe. Yv it ness, R. Fcnn. In ( 160 ) In cases of an annuity or annual produce of any fund, the duty on which is to be deducted by the Fxecutcrs only on rrfaking the payment which completes each year of the first four years, state the account thus : . s. d. The payment compleating the first [second,~) third, or fourth, as the case may be] yearf Q Q of an annuity of lool. [or the interest of a f" ^ fund producing lool.] ~ " ~ ) One fourth of the duty on the valuation of ^ the said annuity [or interest} being 1020!. 2S. > 5 2 o at the rate of two per cent. j Balance received - 19 1 8 o The duties are to be paid by the executors or adminis- trators, on paying the legacies, or any part of them, to the legatees ; or on retaining their own legacies to them- selves. If the executors pay or retain the legacy without paying the duty, or if they pay the legacy deducting the duty, the amount of such duty shall become a personal debt from them to the King: or if they pay the legacies without deducting the duty (unless it is otherwise paid and provided for, as it may be, out of the deceased's property,) then the duty shall be a debt to the Kin, both from the executor and the party receiving the same. 6. . Every gift by Will, whether by way of annuity, of in any other form, chargeable on or payable out of personal estate, or charged also on real estate ; and every donation mortis causa, shall be deemed a legacy. 7. The value of annuities, and the c.uty thereon, is to be calculated according to certain tables annexed to the act. The duty in such case to be paid upon the capital or amount of the valuation of the annuity, by four equal payments ; the first to be made before, or on completing, the payment of the first year's annuity ; and the three others before or on completing the respective payments of the three succeeding years. But if the legatee dies within the four years, the duty to be payable in proportion only to so many cf the payments of the annuity as have actually accrued, and become due and payable : and in case of the determination of an annuity by any other conringejicy than death, so much of the duty paid shall be be returned as will reduce it to the duty on an annuity calculated according to its real existence. 8. Where an annuity is made payable out of another legacy, the value of such annuity, and the duty payable thereon by the annuitant, is to be calculated according to the tables in the act ; and being deducted out of the legacy, the original legatee shall pay duty for the remain- ing amount. 9. If a legacy is given, by directing executors to purchase an annuity to a certain amount, the duty shall be paid on. the valuation of the annuity according to the same tables, as in case of a pecuniary legacy ; and the annuity shall abate proportionally. 10. [If therefore a Testator directs an annuity of zool. to be Purchased for a life or lives, let the executor go to the tamp-office, where he will learn the value put upon it by the act ; as for example, on a life of 28 years of age 1505!. 6s. The duty on this at 2!. per cent, will be some- thing more than 30!. Let the executor pay this to the Stamp-office, and deduct so much from the annuity as 30!. vviil purchase, which will be 2!. per annum, thus making the annuity 98!. clear of the stamp duty.] The duty on legacies, the value of which can only be ascertained, from time to time, by the actual application of the allotted fund, is to be charged on the money as it shall be applied. 1 1. When legacies or residuary estates are, by any means, made payable to persons in succession, if all the persons are liable to the same rate of duty, it shall bfe charged on the legacy, &c. as it would in case it were given to one only. If the legatees, &c. are liable to different rates of duty, they who are entitled to the interest, for life only, shall pay as annuitants ; and the persons who shall at last become absolutely entitled, shall pay the duty when they receive the legacy. 12. Such duty to be paid by the cxccutorsy upon payment of every or any part of the legacy to any legatee or their trustees : or if the fund is transferred to trustees^ or the legacy or interest is payable by one to another legatee, such trustee or legatee shall be liable for the duty as executors are, and be considered as debtors to the King for the same. 13, 15. Any legacy subjected to a power of appointment for the benefit of persons specially described, shall be charged with duty as property given to different persons in suc- cession. 18. M Plate, ( 162' ) Phte, furniture, &c. while enjoyed in kind, is not liable to the duty, till it comes into possession of persons having power to dispose thereof. 14. The duty on legacies in joint-tenancy is to be paid, from time to time, in proportion to the, interest of the parties, and as they benefit by the legacies. 16. The duty on legacies subject to contingencies is to be charged (to the executor) as in the case of an ab- solute bequest ; and if the contingency happens, and the legacy goes to a person from whom a larger duty is due, such legatee shall pay the difference. 17. Personal estate directed to be laid out in the purchase of real estate shall pay duty as a personal legacy ; unless when it is given to be enjoyed by persons in succession, and then the duty is to be paid only till it is actually applied in purchase of real estate. 19. Estates for the life of another, applicable by law as personal estate, shall pay duty as such. 20. The Testator may charge any fund with the payment of the duty on all or any of his legacies, so that the legacy may go duty-free to the legatee ; and the sum so left for payment of the duty shall not be liable to duty as a legacy. 21. In cases of specifick legacies, or where a residue shall consist of property not reduced into money, the executor, or the person liable to the duty, may set a value on such legacy or residue ; or require the Commissioners of Stamps to appoint a person to value the same at the expence of the legatee or executor; and the duty is to be gssessed on such valuation. If the executor or legatee is dissatisfied with the valuation of the Commissioners, it may be reviewed by the Commissioners of Land-tax, by way of appeal ; at the expence of the executor, &c. in case their valuation exceeds that of the Commissioners of Stamps: and in cases of dispute between the executor and legatee, the duty shall be assessed by the Stamp Commissioners, with appeal to the Land-tax Commis- sioners ; such appeal hvall cases to be made to the Land- tax Commissioners for the district where the effects are, at their next meeting after the Stamp Commissioners shall have assessed and required payment of the duty, if at fourteen days distance ; or otherwise at their next suc- ceeding meeting, giving six days notice to the Stamp Commissioners. 22. The ( 163 ) The duty on legacies, not satisfied in money, is to be paid according to the value of the property taken in satisfaction ; and in case of a legacy given in satisfaction of another legacy, the duty shall not be paid on both, but on that which yields the largest duty. 23. If legatees refuse to accept legacies duty deducted, and sue for the same, the court in which they sue, may, though no actual tender has been made, order the lega- tees to pay the costs ; and in suits where the party sued mav wish to stop proceedings on payment of legacies, deducting duties, the court may make order therein accordingly. 24. If a suit be instituted concerning administration, the court shall provide for payment of the duty. 25. Executors may discharge legacies in part, on payment of a proportion of the duty accrued. 26. fjr* No executor, administrator, trustee, or other person liable to pay the duty shall pay, satisfy, or com- pound for, any legacy or residue, or part thereof liable to duty, without taking a receipt or discharge in writing for the same, containing the date, or time of payment, the name of the testator or intestate, the name of the legatee, amount of the legacy, and amount of the duty. And no receipt for any legacy or residue or part thereof shall be received in evidence or available, unless stamped according to the Act : and no evidence shall be admitted of any payment of a legacy, except the stamped receipt, unless actual payment of the duty shall be first given in evidence : for which purpose the copy of the entry of payment of the duty at the Stamp-office is sufficient. Such receipts are required for annuities, or legacies charged as annuities, only on completing the payments of each year for the first four years. 27. A penalty of lol. per cent, on the sum paid is imposed on the party paying, and also on the party receiving legacies, or any part thereof, without taking and giving receipts duly stamped according to the act. 28. All receipts for legacies, &c. shall be taken, within twenty-one days after they bear date, to the nearest Stamp-office, to be stamped, paying the duty for the same, when an acknowledgment of the payment of the duty shall be written on them by the proper officer: receipts rriay be stamped at any time within three months, on payment of the duty, and lol. per cent, M 2 thereon ( 164 ) thereon as a penalty. 29. And mistakes in paying the duty may be rectified on payment of the difference, and lol. per cent, thereon within three months if no suit is instituted, 30. Altering any receipt incurs a penalty of 500!. and forging the stamp is felony, punishable with death, 39, 40. Persons swearing falsely are liable to the penalties' of perjury. (l^f 3 Persons paying or receiving money contrary to the provisions of the act shall be indemnified, on discover- ing the other offender within twelve months. 31. Penalties if sued for within three months, half to the informer and half to the King ; or if sued for afterwards by the Crown, the Commissioners may reward the in- former to the amount of half the penalty. 43, 44. If, by reason of infancy or absence, legacies cannot be paid, the money after deducting and paying the duty may be paid into the Bank, in the name of the accountant general of the court of chancery, on account of the lega- tees, and laid out in the 3 per cents. If such money be improperly paid in, the Chancery may dispose thereof to the parties entitled : if more than the proper duty has been paid the Commissioners for Stamps may return the excess; and if less, on payment of the full duty, the Chancery may order repayment to the party. 32. [When money is so paid, the certificate thereof given by the accountant general shall be filed in the report office of the Court of Chancery: and the accountant general's drafts on the Bank for the money shall be entered in the same office, and signed by the register, and shall then be a warrant to the Bank for payment of the money to the parties entitled. 37 Geo. 3. c. 135.] If it shall appear to the Commissioners Tor Stamps, at the end of two years after the death of any person, that it will require time ti> collect the effects, or will be dif- ficult to ascertain the residue of the personal estate, the duty may be compounded for ; on application to the Courts of Exchequer in England or Scotland, on affidavit stating the circumstances ; and the Court may appoint a person to value such residue accordingly. 33. If at any time, after payment of duty on any legacy or residue, any debt should be recovered against the estate, by reason whereof any legatee or entitled person shall be obliged to refund, the Commissioners are, on proof thereof on oath, to repay the duty. 34. Executors ( 165 ) Executors and administrators, previous to their re- taining their own legacies or share of the residue, are, (at the time when they shall in due course of administra- tion be entitled to retain such legacies,) to transmit the particulars with the duty offered, to the Commissioners of Stamps, who shall charge the same with the duty, and on payment give a receipt for the same. The penalty on'executors neglecting payment of the duty for fourteen days, in such case, is treble the value or amount of the duty. 35. If any administration be made void, and any duty shall have been improperly paid, it shall be repaid ; but if it ought to have been paid it shall be allowed in account with the rightful executors. 37. [The above Act applies to the effects of persons dying after April 26, 1796: though their Wills may have been made years before.] NUMBER ( 166 ) NUMBER X. Form of a Receipt for a Legacy, which may be adopted where the Old Stamp-duty takes place: or where the per-centage Duty is provided for by the Will of the Testator. - RECEIVED the 2501 day of September, 1786, of Mr. John Adams, and Mr. \Viiliam Thomson, executors of the last Will and Testament of John Doe, late of Cheapside, London, linen-draper, deceased, the sum of one hundred pounds, (and if it is stock, add [three per centum per annum consolidated annuities, transferable at the Bank of England, by a transfer of the same in the books of the Governov and Company of the said Bank] or as the case may be) being in full for a legacy to that amount, devised to me in and by the said last Will and Testament of the said John Doe, bearing date the 3d of January, in the year 1785. [The stamp-duty for the said legacy having been provided for by the Will of the said John Doe.] As witness my hand, JOHN DENX. Witness, RICHARD FENN. NUMBER ( 167 NUMBER XL xpei;ces of obtaining Probates or Letters of Administration. (Including the Stamps imposed by the Act 37 Geo. 3. c . 90. ) In common Form. By Commission. f \V here the v alue of the Goods * is. Probates. Adminis- Probates. Adminis- tration. tration . * A. ,- s- d. . s. d. s - d. Under 5!. 070 096 o 17 o o 18 o 5!. and under 61. 61. and under 20!. o 15 6 120 I 2 6 i 9 2 I 13 7 210 i 19 8 2 8 8 20!. and under 40!. 230 2 4 ; 3 14 o 3 6 8 40!. and under iool. 2 3 o 2 14 6 3 14 o, 3 19 8] 100!. and under 300!. 4 15 6 5 7 io ! ; 6 9 o 6 13 o 300!. and under 6ool. 10 12 2 ii 4 6, 12 6 6 1298 6ool. and under loool. 14 15 6 15 7 10 16 9 10 16 13 o loool, and under 2000!. ,24 * Io 24 17 8 ;25 17 10 26 3 6 2000!. and under 5000!. '35 2 10 35 17 8 36 17 10 37 3 6' 5000!. and under i ooool.; 5 2 2 Jo 52 17 8 53 17 1054 3 6 tooool. and upwards j68 16 2 69 ii o 70 ii 2 70 16 10 To a Seaman or Marine ; and Warrant, Petty, or Nbn-Commissione(J Officer in the Navy; according to stat. 32 Geo. 3. c. 34, 31, 32, 33. 1. If granted to Ike H'idnic, Child, Parent, Brother or Sister, being Executor or Xfrt of Kin to receive Wages, &c. 2. If granted to other Persons being E realtors or Next of Kin to receive Wages. 3. 'If granted to Widov:, Children, Parents, Brother or Sister for othe- general purposes. Where the Value of the Goods is In common Form. j By Commission. Probates. 'Adminis- j (ration. :Probates. Adminis- tration. f Under 20!. J2ol. and under 40!. r> J4ol. and under 6ol. ^6ol. and under jool. f Under 20!. j 20!. and under 40!. 2 'j4ol. and under 6ol. ^6ol. and under iool. ,3. If under iool. . f. d., . s. d. o 6 o: o 14 o o 19 6 76 130; ii o i 7 6j .15 6 ./.<* o 18 o 15 o 19. 6 6 o . s. d. i 6 o * 3 I 276 2 14 o 15 2! 42 i 8 8; 17 8 : 10 2 i ii 8 I 14- 2 16 8 I I 9 2 3 o 8 3 ii 6 3 14 o i i 13 8 2 ii o o 5 oj o 5 o|| o 10 o 10 Notes ( 168 ) Notes, &c. to the preceding Page. * In valuing a Testator's or Intestate's property, the yalue of funded property is ta^en at the price of the day when the administration, &c. is granted. i Commissions are necessary where the executors or administrators are ill, or live in the country ; and the probate or administration is grantable in the Prerogative Court in London, and the executor or administrator does not personally appear. These fees are the least which are at any time taken ; and respect only such Wills as are very short ; for if the Will exceeds three or four sheets (containing ninety words in each sheet) the expence will be more, increasing at the rate of about two shillings for every such sheet. And as the amount of the stamp increases, proctors charge proportionably for their trouble and advance of capital j generally at the rate of about 15 per cent, on the money actually laid out by them. If a man has goods or effects to the value of 5!. or upwards in two or more several dioceses of the same province, the administration must be taken out of the prerogative court of the archbishop of the diocese. If in several dioceses of the province of Canterbury, and several of York, there must be two prerogative adminis- trations ; and if in one diocese of each province, each Bishop of the diocese must grant one.. fj^* All Bills by Proctors, for Letters of Administration to Creditors of Seamen, &c. are to be examined and taxed by the Regifter of the Prerogative Court. NUMBER ( 169 ) NUMBER XII. Form of the Oath of a Creditor, who wishes to obtain Administration to receive his debt; where the executor is out of the kingdom ; under the Act 38 Geo. 3. c. 87. (See p. 103.) I A. B. of do swear, that there is due and owing to me, upon bond or simple contract, or upon account unsettled, [as the case may happen to be, in which latter case he shall swear to the best of his belief only], from the estate and effects of deceased, the sum of and that C. D. the only executor capable of acting, and to whom probate hath been granted, hath departed this kingdom, and is now out of the jurisdiction of his Majesty's courts of law and equity, and that this deponent is desirous of exhibiting a bill in equity in his Majesty's court of for the purpose of being paid his demand out of the assets of the said testator, Form ( 1*0 } NUMBER XIII. form of the Administration to be granted in such case. By divine providence, Archbishop of Canterbury, ^_ __^ Primate of all England and Metropolitan, to our well-beloved in Christ, Greeting : Whereas it hath been alledged before the Worshipful Doctor of Laws, Surrogate of Doctor of Laws, Master, Keeper, or Commissary of our Prerogative Court of Can- terbury, lawfully constituted by you the said That did, whilst living and of sound mind, memory, and understanding, make and duly execute liis last Will and Testament in writing, and did thereof nominate, constitute, and appoint his executors, (or, sole executor,) who in the month of proved the said Will by the authority of our said Court, and now reside (or, resides) out of this kingdom, and out of the juris- diction of his Majesty's courts of law and equity, (as in and by an affidavit duly made and sworn to by and brought into and left in the registry of our said Court, reference being thereunto had, will more fully and at large appear) : And whereas the Surrogate aforesaid, having duly considered the premises, did, at the petition of the said decree letters of administration of all and singular the goods, chattels, and credits of the said deceased, to be committed and granted to you the said named by or on the behalf of the said a creditor, (legatee) or (one of the next kin) of the said deceased, (as the case may be), limited for the purpose, to become and be made a party to a bill or bills to be exhibited against you in any of his Majesty's courts of equity, and to carry the decree or decrees of any of the said court or courts into effect, but no further or otherwise, (justice so requiring) : And we being desirous that the said goods, chattels, and credits, may be well and faithfully administered, applied, and disposed of, according to law, do therefore, by these presents, grant full power and authority to you, in whose fidelity we confide, confide, to administer, and faithfully dispose of the said goods, chattels, and credits, according to the tenor and effect of the said Will, limited as aforesaid, so far as such goods, chattels, and credits of the deceased will thereto extend, and the law requires, you having been already sworn, well and faithfully to administer the same, * and to make a true and perfect inventory of all and singular the said goods, chattels, and credits, so far as the same may come to your hands, and to exhibit the same into the registry of our said Prerogative Court of Canterbury, on or before the next ensuing, and also to render a just and true account thereof: And we do by these presents ordain and constitute you Adminis- trator of all and singular the goods, chattels, and credits of the said deceased, limited as aforesaid, but no further, or otherwise. GIVEN at London, the day of in the year of our Lord and in the year of our translation. INDEX. INDEX The Figures refer to the Pages ; Ap. means the Appendix, A. \ DMINISTRATION, /\ (letters of), 96, 97, 98, 101, and see Probate. Form of, when granted to a Creditor under 38 G. 0.87. Ap. No. XIII. Administrator. See Execu- tor, Infant. his powers and du- ties, 96, 102, 105. his oath and bond, 101. Administratrix. See Mar- ried Women. Advowson, 34, Aliens, 15, 47. Assets, 112. Banished man's wife, 24. Bastard, 90. Benefice, 34. Blind, 21. Bonds (devising), 35. of administrator, 101. Borough-English, 78, 84. C. Charity (devises for), 31. Codicil, 5. Ap. No. VI. Companies, 31. Condition, 51. Contingent Legacy. See Legacy. Contingent Remainder, 57. Coparceners, 79. Copyhold, io, 31, 50, 62. Corporations, 31. Creditor, 100, 116. Ap. No. XII. XIII, Curtesy of England, 38, 72. Customs of London and York, 29, 36, 90. Custom of London (as to. joint-tenants), 36. Deaf people, 20. Debts due (devise of), 35. (devise to pay), 48. Payment of. See Executor. satisfaction of, by legacy, 119. Descent of real estate, 78. INDEX. Devise, executory. See Executory Devise. of Lands. Sec Lands. of Legacies. See Le- gacies. void, 47. Distribution of Estate. See Intestate and Residue. Donatlo Causa Afortis, 5. Double Legacy. See Le- gacy. Dower, 37, 77. Drunken Persons, 20. Dumb Persons, 20. Duplicate of Will, 71. E. Estate. See Fee-Simple, Tenant, &c. Real and Personal Estate. Estate for Life, 47. or legacy, 117, cles, ii 8. and see Ap. No. IX. title to residue, 124. Executory devise of lands, 56, 57- of goods or money, 65- F. Fee simple, 42, 47. Fee tail. See Estate tail. Felons, 26. Feme covert. See Married Woman. Fraud in making Wills, 25. Freeholds, 42. Funds. See Stocks. G. Gavelkind, 78. Guardians, 103. H. Half-blood, 80. Heir at law, 79, 8c. Tenant pour autre vie. Estate-Tail, 43, 52, 77. Excommunicated Persons, 27, 96. Execution of Wills. See Wills. Executor (devise by), 38. Executor, 92, 102. de son tort, or of his own wrong, 99. him, 45, 46, 51. Hotchpot, . I. Idiots, 1 8. Implication, devises by, 44. Infants (of Wills by), 18. unborn, 57. 108. 94, 108. inventory, no. (joint executors), I 12. Intention of testator, 44. debt, 114. INDEX. friterest on debts, 1 14. legacies, 123. . Intestacy (or dying without . Will), 67. m Intestate, distribution of his estate, 76, 83. Inventory by executor, 1 10, in. Ap. No. VIII. Joint tenants, 36, 50. K. Kin, next of, 78, So. King. See Queen. Lands purchased after mak- ing Will, 39, 69. agreed to be pur- chased, 34. of devising them, 8, 30, 38, 41, Ap. No. II. Leasehold estate, 35, 51, 60, . Legacy, double, 6, 7. -specific, 69, 1 1 8. payment of, 1 18. to infants, 123. in satisfaction of debts, 119. lapsed and vested, 1 20, 123. survivorship in, 120. contingent or con- ditional, 121, 123, interest on, 123. receipts for, stamps on, and rules to execu- tors as to the payment of, Ap. No. IX. X. London, customs of. 29, 36. 88, 90. Lunatics, 19. Married" woman, or feme covert, 21, 69, 88, 98. administratrix, 98, Mortmain, 31. Mortgage, devise of, 33. after devise, 75. N. Next of kin, 78, 83, 85. Nuncupative Will, v, Ap. No. VII. o. Outlaws, 27. P. Papists, 28. Paraphernalia, no, iii. Parson, 34. Payment. See Debts and Legacies. Perpetuities, 47, 55. Personal estate, what, 112. Pin money, 24. Posthumous Children, 82. Probate, 107, 109. expences of, Ap. No. XL Q. Queen Consort, 23. [Particular powers, as to Devises, have been given to the Queen (and to the King) by an Act which passed after this page was printed, viz. 39 Sc 40 G. 3. c. 88.] INDEX. R. Receipt for Legacy, Ap. No. X. Republication ") of Wills. Revocation } See Will. Residue, distribution of, 124. Refusal. ) c T- Retainer.} See Executor. Satisfaction of debts by legacy, 119. Stamp duty (none) onWills, 14. on legacy receipts, Ap. No. IX. ' on probates. See Ap. No. XI. Stocks, of money in the funds, 69. T. 'Tenant in common, 50, 75. Tenant pour autre vie, (for another's life), 33, 43, Tenant by the curtesy, 43, 77- Testament, i. Threats (make Wills void,) 25- Traitors, 26, 28. Trustees, 47. U. Universities, 32. W. Will (what), i; where two are found, 6. rules as to execution 7, 8, 9, 10. republication of, 1 1, Ap. No. III. who may make, 16. revocation of, 68. Witnesses to Wills, 10, 11. Wife's estate, 37. FINIS, Collins, Printer, Sarum, i ilUsr =3 -_i/ -js J>S~l 1 3 i \ i g ? ^ ^\\E-UNIVER5/4 .^lOS-ANCE ^OF-CAUFO/?^ ^OF-CAIIFO^ \\\EUNIVER5/A ^ USAl i^^\% g)T I -.. I 1 ^ * 3 a ^ \\E-l)NIVER5/A ~ A 000 023 222 3 ^IOS ANGELA \ ^^ r %* ld 5X\EUNIVEf jAilQS-ANGEtfo, ^OF-CAUF f>"jp*l I8L^ tr