imm 
 
 I BR/^:iOFTHE 
 
 COLLEGE OF AfiPtlCl^- 
 
 COPYjf 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. 
 
 AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 BERKELEY, CAL. 
 
 £. W. HILGARD, Director.'*' 
 
 E. J. WICK SON, Acting Director. 
 
 BULLETIN NO. 99. 
 
 f^OOT KJMOTS ON fRUIT TREES AJVJD VIJVJES. 
 
 Inteoductoky Note. — The subject upon 
 which Prof. Woodworth makes the following 
 interesting statement has perplexed California 
 fruitgrowers for many years. Almost every- 
 thing imaginable has been cited as a probable 
 cause; conditions of drouth or of excessive mois- 
 ture were among the earliest causes assigned, 
 and some prejudice against nursery stock 
 grown by irrigation was created. An investi- 
 gation by a committee of the State Horti- 
 cultural Society about 1880 showed that the 
 knotted roots were found quite as abundant 
 in unirrigated land as in irrigated, and other- 
 wise the inquiry yielded no definite results. 
 For some time many nurserymen followed the 
 practice of removing the knots from the trees 
 as dug from the row, but this was abandoned 
 when it was found that the knot commonly re- 
 appeared after planting in the orchard. At 
 present no reputable nurseryman sells such 
 trees; they are burned at the nursery. 
 
 In my personal examination of knots, which 
 has continued for 15 years, I have but on one 
 occasion found a nematode gall and that was 
 upon the root of an English walnut sent from 
 Los Angeles county. Nearly all the others were 
 of the character described by Prof. Woodworth 
 as " crown galls," although they are found in 
 many cases farther down on the roots. Some 
 orchardists have been at great expense in lay- 
 ing bare the roots and smoothly paring the 
 
 Absent on leave, 12 moH., from June 15, 1892. 
 
 roots and applying various substances to the 
 roots. In most cases the knots have reappeared 
 subsequently. Others have laid bare the knot- 
 burdened root crown to the sun and the knots 
 have flaked off, but others have been found 
 afterward lower down on the roots. 
 
 It must be acknowledged that the cause of 
 the evil and its cure are still unknown, and it 
 is to be hoped that Prof. Woodworth's study 
 of the subject, which is still in progress, may 
 reach definite conclusions. His advice not to 
 plant a diseased root should be zealously ad- 
 hered to by all planters. Probably during the 
 last 20 years, hundreds of thousands of such 
 trees have spindled and died in the best soil 
 and with the best treatment. If the disease 
 has stunted the growth of a young tree, pluck 
 it omt and plant a new one. If knots are found 
 on larger trees, which are making satisfactory 
 growth in spite of them, remedial measures 
 should be tried. The final result seems to de- 
 pend upon whether the natural or the diseased 
 growth secures the ascendancy early in the life 
 of the tree, for apricot trees have been taken up 
 after 30 years of satisfactory growth and bear- 
 ing, and found to have roots badly infested 
 with the knots. E. J. Wickson, 
 
 Acting Director. 
 
 There is no one thing about which so 
 many inquires have been received as a pecu- 
 liar form of root-knot or gall on a number of 
 plants, but chiefly grape and apricot. These 
 
knots are of irregular shape, fleshy and 
 naostly situated at or about the crown of the 
 roots. 
 
 On different plants they present a some- 
 what different appearance, but they are so 
 near alike in structure as to prove that they 
 must all be due to practically the same 
 causes. 
 
 This form of gall has received a number 
 of local names, the most widely used of 
 which is that of " black knot," particularly 
 for the form that occurs on the grape. This 
 is an objectionable name, as it has long 
 been used in the eastern States for a very 
 different kind of gall that occurs on the 
 stems of cherries and related plants. On 
 account of its presence at the crown of the 
 root, almost invariably, it may be called the 
 crown gall or knot, so as to distinguish it 
 from other forms of root galls, of which 
 there are quite a number of kinds, sometimes 
 with much the same general appearance as 
 the crown gall, but which show a decided 
 preference for the other parts of the roots. 
 
 The crown galls arise generally from one 
 side of the crown as a simple swelling of 
 fleshy substance of about the consistency of 
 a potato or perhaps somewhat harder. They 
 soon become irregularly granular over the 
 surface and dark-brown in color, the outer 
 parts of the granulations into which the 
 surface is divided being the darkest. When 
 cut or broken open they are almost white 
 at first, but very soon become reddish-brown 
 on exposure to the air. Under the micro- 
 scope, they may be seen to be composed of 
 large, thin- walled cells, with now and then 
 the distorted and scattered elements of the 
 fibro-vascular bundles. 
 
 A young gall of this kind contains very 
 much water, and on drying, becomes sponge- 
 like in appearance, and is very light and 
 quite hard. Older knots are similar, but 
 harder, and dry into harder and firmer 
 masses, which do not shrink or become 
 sponge-like. In size the crown gall varies 
 greatly, being often as large as one*s fist and 
 sometimes much larger, especially in the 
 apricot. 
 
 Of other root galls, we may distinguish 
 five different kinds : 
 
 1st. Mechanical galls, which are slight 
 swellings, sometimes produced at points 
 where the roots meet obstructions, and are 
 quite common on the roots of some plants 
 in a stony soil. They may be told at once 
 from a crown gall by their comparatively 
 smooth surface, and by the fact that they 
 only accompany an abrupt bend of the root. 
 They are only slight swellings and flatten- 
 ings of the root, and are seldom found any- 
 where near the crown. Indeed, they are 
 the form of root gall least likely to be mis- 
 taken for the crown gall. 
 
 2d. Louse galls due to the attacks of 
 plant lice. Those caused by the phylloxera 
 and woolly aphis are well-known examples. 
 They are almost always of small size, oc- 
 curring on both large and small roots, and 
 as often at the crown as elsewhere. The 
 presence of the lice is generally sufficient 
 as a distinguishing character, though their 
 small size may render them hard to be 
 seen. 
 
 3d. Tubercle galls found only on the 
 roots of plants of the pea family. Only the 
 smaller roots are affected. The gall is 
 about an eighth of an inch or less in di- 
 ameter, the whole inside of which is 
 swarming with minute moving particles 
 which appear to be bacteria. They play 
 an important role in the acquisition by 
 the plant of nitrogen from the air. The 
 small size of these galls and their presence 
 only on the small roots will distinguish 
 them from the crown galls. 
 
 4th. Club-foot galls produced by a 
 slime-mold (Plasmodium brassicae), on the 
 roots of cabbages and such plants. These 
 galls are somewhat yellowish when broken 
 open, which color is due to the presence of 
 the slime-mold in great abundance in the 
 diseased tissues of the gall. They may be 
 distinguished from the crown galls by not 
 being so knotlike, but being much more 
 closely attached to the plant. 
 
 5th. Nematode galls which are due to 
 minute worms resembling very much the 
 so-called vinegar eels. They are found on 
 the roots of a great number of plants. The 
 worms are so small that ordinarily they 
 will not be seen without examining sections 
 
under the microscope. The small size of 
 the gall, and its presence chiefly on the 
 smaller roots, will distinguish it from the 
 crown gall. 
 
 There are several theories as to the cause 
 of the crown gall, but none of them are 
 without very serious objections. One idea 
 is that these galls are the result of wounds 
 made in cultivation, and I think it has 
 been proven that at least in a few cases the 
 galls have followed such wounds. In at- 
 tempting to heal a wound, as is well known, 
 the plant will often produce at that point 
 a slight swelling, and it is argued that at 
 the crown the conditions are such that a 
 large swelling will result. There are, how- 
 ever, a number of fatal objections to this 
 hypothesis. Neither is the crown gall the 
 uniform result of a wound, nor is a wound, 
 at least one made by human agency, neces- 
 sary to produce a gall, though it would 
 be bold to assert that there had never been 
 a wound of any kind at the point where the 
 gall is produced. The most fatal objection 
 to this hypothesis is the fact that the ap- 
 pearance, the manner of growth and all the 
 phenomena connected with the crown gall 
 are so different from those of a healing 
 wound that there seems scarcely any reason 
 to connect the two. 
 
 Another theory is that they are due to 
 peculiar conditions of the weather, such as 
 frosts, excessive rains and such things at 
 a critical time in the spring, causing an 
 abnormal stagnation or an excessive flow of 
 sap, and the gall is the result. These sup- 
 positions are scarcely reconxiilable with the 
 facts of plant physiology, and it has never 
 been observed that these galls Are produced 
 in particular abundance immediately fol- 
 lowing any peculiar spring condition. 
 Indeed, the idea seems tu arise from the 
 general tendency to ascribe every abnormal 
 condition of a plant to the weather. 
 
 A third theory is that they are due to 
 some of the fungi related perhaps to that 
 which produces the true black knot. The 
 only objection to this theory is that no such 
 fungus has ever been observed about the 
 knots, at least not in the living knots, and 
 it may be that a more carefvil study than 
 
 has yet been made will show that such fun 
 gus does occur. 
 
 Finally, as has become quite the fashion 
 of late years, the bacteria have been charged 
 with the injury. I myself have succeeded 
 in getting pure cultures of a micrococcus 
 from the inside of some of the knots, after 
 taking all the usual precautions to prevent 
 accidental contamination. I do not succeed, 
 however, with all knots of this kind, and 
 not having further evidence, such as, for 
 instance, the communication of the disease 
 to healthy plants, we are not in a position 
 to say that we have found the cause. 
 
 The presence of a gall at the crown of a 
 plant seems to effect an obstruction to the 
 flow of the sap, and in this way a tree or 
 vine becomes weakened and finally dies. 
 The gall generally attacks small plants, but 
 not always, and it often takes a number of 
 years before the plant is killed. 
 
 Whatever the cause, many fruitgrowers 
 in California have had reason to know the 
 seriousness of the injury produced, so the 
 following words in regard to remedies and 
 prevention will not be out of place. Not 
 knowing the cause, they can be but sugges- 
 tions, but it is believed that the treatment 
 laid down is the safest procedure. 
 
 First, in the orchard the knots should be 
 carefully removed and burned as soon as 
 found, and an antiseptic application made 
 to the tree where the knot has been re- 
 moved. We would recommend Bordeaux 
 mixture for this purpose. Trees so treated 
 should be examined from time to time for 
 at least a year, and should the knot reap- 
 pear, it would be best to remove and destroy 
 the whole tree. When a tree is removed, it 
 would be well to delay resetting for a year 
 or two, or to reset with a tree of an un- 
 susceptible kind. 
 
 Second, when setting an orchaid, reject 
 all stock affected by the knot. I would pre- 
 fer to have stock from a nursery known to 
 be entirely free from ib. 
 
 Third, in the nursery the greatest care 
 should be taken to destroy by burning ev- 
 erythingr showing any evidence of the dis- 
 ease. Fields ia which these galls have 
 appeared should be devoted to some other 
 crop for a number of years. 
 
 C. W. WOODWORTH, 
 
 December 1, 1892. Berkeley, Oal, 
 
A JVJEW JMOZZbE TESTER. 
 
 The latest acquisition in the line of ap- 3. Distance the spray is thrown, 
 
 paratus for experimentation is a new nozzle- 4, Angle of dispersion, 
 
 tester that has just been constructed at the 5. Average fineness of spray. 
 
 University of California. There are many 6. Distribution of spray, 
 
 kinds of spray nozzles on the market, and 7. Uniformity in fineness, 
 
 excellent ones, too, but they are of widely It is believed that by such a study of new 
 
 different types and so are not equally suit- nozzles the following questions may be 
 
 able for the same use. There has not been settled: 
 
 as yet any attempt to determine carefully 1. The best types of nozzles for particular 
 
 and accurately their relative merits. This purposes. 
 
 the University Experiment Station now 2. The conditions under which each 
 
 proposes to do. nozzle gives its best results. 
 
 The most conspicuous part of the new 3. The changes in the construction of any 
 
 nozzle-tester is a large tank intended to nozzle which will make it more available for 
 
 maintain a constant pressure. From the any particular purpose, 
 
 lower part of this tank a large pipe leads to We also intend to study old nozzles, com- 
 
 the apparatus, to which the nozzle is at- paring them with new ones of the same kind 
 
 tached. The large diameter of this pipe to determine: 
 
 makes the friction of the water flowing 1. The cause and amount of deterioration, 
 through it practically nothing. Just before 2. Changes in construction which might 
 the point where the nozzle is attached there overcome these defectf. 
 is a steam gauge to register the pressure and We would like to receive from manufac- 
 a mercury manometer for determining more turers and dealers in spraying apparatus 
 accurately the lower pressures. It is hardly specimens of their nozzles for experiment, 
 worth while at present to attempt to de- For the study of old nozzles we would like- 
 scribe the various contrivances for the ac- wise request fruitgrowers and others to for- 
 curate measurement of the action of the ward to us their old nozzles together with a 
 nozzle and of the spray, as they will all be statement as to the extent and kind of 
 fully described and illustrated in a later washes that have been used in them. The 
 bulletin, where also the results of actual data in regard to all nozzles tested will be 
 tests of the more common nozzles in the published in full with illustrations in the 
 market will be given. bulletins and reports of the Experiment Sta- 
 The data that will be determined for each tion, and the nozzles will be preserved and 
 nozzle under different pressures is as exhibited in the museum of the department. 
 
 follows: 0. W. WOODWOBTH. 
 
 1. Volume of discharge per second. Berkeley, Dec. 16, 1892. 
 
 2. Velocity of steam just in front of the 
 nozzle.