SJ>HGUGHT®a ^ m THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES / LIFE THOUGHTS OF MICHAEL HENBY. LIFE THOUGHTS MICHAEL HENRY REPRINT OF PAPERS CONTRIBUTED BY HIM ''SABBATH READINGS," ISSUED BY THE JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE DIFFUSION OF RELIGIOUS KNOWLEDGE. LONDON: P. VALLENTINE, 34, ALFRED STREET, BEDFORD SQUARE. 1876 LONDON: FEINTED BY WERTHEIMEP, LEA AND CO. CIRCUS PLACE, FINSBUB.Y CIRCUS. B-fi INTRODUCTION. To those of tlie present generation who may read this volume, it will not be necessary to say a single word about the Author. For the name of Michael Henry lives, and is likely to live, in the heart of every member of that community he loved so well. But lest, in days to come, this book may chance to fall into the hands of any to whom its Author's name is unknown, or lest Time — often only mindful of work, and oblivious of the worker — may efface from human memory the high virtues of him, whose Life Thoughts lie embalmed in these pages, it is right that the reader should, by these few words of introduction, be introduced to the Author. The task falls to the lot of those, who had the privilege of being among his fellow -workers, and who knew him best. His was no ordinary life. Busy among the busiest in the world's work, he was busier still in the work of improving the world. Not with the chimeras of wild theorists, nor with the unpractical schemes of ordinary philanthropists ; but dealing singly with individuals, doing practical good in detail to the men and women and boys and girls with whom he came in contact, and ( VI INTRODUCTION. imparting to everyone, with whom or for whom he worked, a share of his own goodness, a spark of his own fervid zeal for the cause of Religion and Progress. Good himself, he believed in the goodness of all the world besides ; and whatever faults he possessed were but the faults of optimism. No one can read these pages without being irre- sistibly led to the conclusion that none but a truly pious man could have penned them, and that they con- stitute the natural outpouring of a pure, unsullied heart. The conclusion will be a just one. It is no exaggera- tion to say that the lessons the Author inculcates are those which he practised in his every- day life ; and that many of the ideals of character represented in these pages were, to no small extent, realised in himself. His life, private and public, was one long act of self- denial. Ever working for others ; ever forgetful of his own personal interests, pleasures and ambitions ; having but one aim, but one object in life — to make his fellow-men and fellow-Jews happier, wiser and better ; worthy of the ancient glories of their race, worthy of those glories which are the Israelite's hope. CONTENTS, PAGE Moses 1 Elijah 12 Josiah ...... 28 Neherniah ...... 53 Moses Mendelssohn .... 71 Bar-mitzvah .... 84 Home Worship .... 93 The Benediction of the Cohanim 100 The Psalms of David 111 The Hundred-and-Fourth Psalm 122 A Message of Love . 132 Peace 139 Humility ..... 146 Lost at Sea .... . 158 Heaven upon Earth . . 165 The Soul's Beconciliation . . 178 The Everlasting Light . 198 A Gossip with Boys . . 212 How we Spoilt our Holiday . 229 The Schoolboy and the Angel . 244 The Everlasting Rose 266 LIFE THOUGHTS OF MICHAEL HENEY. MOSES. : W3 |p ntiXti \3 '• Thou hast found grace iu my sight." — Exodus xxxiii. 17. Encircled by the sacred halo of Revelation, Sinai stands peculiarly distinguished among the mountains of all the world. And, like the sacred hill on which the most divine of gifts descended, the Prophet chosen to receive that gift, Moses our Master, stands pre- eminent on the face of history amidst the great names of all humanity. The circumstance that he was selected to receive and promulgate the sublime code dictated by Heaven to Earth, suffices to single him out amongst the children of men, and to stamp him with the most remarkable distinction and the most intense individuality. To fulfil a great object — the teaching of the Law of life on earth — he received from Heaven an extra- ordinary and peculiar inspiration. But his inspiration, though it glorified his being, did not transfigure it into a more spiritual order of creation. He was a Prophet, and the greatest of Prophets ; — but he was a Man, though the greatest of men. 2 MOSES. We must not misunderstand the expression inspira- tion in its Biblical sense. There are some who misuse the term, and such misuse sometimes produces a dangerous confusion of ideas. Some amplify its application, and imagine that the inspiration of the Prophet endowed him permanently with superhuman powers, and elevated him above the ranks of ordinary mortality. Others extend its supposed import, and Misapply it to every description of genius. Yet in the due Biblical sense of the word "inspiration/' the Prophet was only inspired within certain limits and for certain objects : and mere genius is not inspired at all. Because inspiration, in its highest and theo- logical meaning, appears to be the direct dictation by Heaven to human hands, lips, or minds, of certain laws, truths, and behests, which Heaven desires to proclaim and promulgate for the promotion of human welfare. In the Divine policy, it has seemed best that these laws, truths, and commands, be declared by the familiar channel of the voice and pen of mortal men — creatures like those to whom they are to be announced and whom they mainly affect — rather than by astound- ing and supernatural manifestations which might have been used to convey to earth the will of Heaven. Inspiration is, in effect, a superhuman impulse acting- through human means, for a superhuman purpose directed to human objects. And we insist on this definition, because mistaken persons, who apply to genius the word " inspiration," would elevate profane writers to a spiritual level, and consequently degrade Biblical revelation from its sublime eminence ; or they imagine inspiration to affect every word, thought, action, and feeling of its recipient, and thus fail to MOSES. 6 learn the lesson derivable from the consideration of a good and graceful life — the life of a man like ourselves in all respects, save for the one circumstance that the marvel of inspiration has descended upon him. Closes is an instance in point. It is true he was inspired. Inspired surpassingly. Inspired more distinctly and directly than any other Prophet. The impulse of inspiration glorified him for the purpose of enabling him to teach humanity that moral law by which Heaven decided to control the world which it had created. No better or wiser medium could have been selected than the lips of a man of the most noble character and a most gentle spirit ; a heart ever long- ing for justice, and warm with love for his kind. That Moses was inspired — and far above the calibre of all other inspired men — we need scarcely urge. There is no other instance in all history of the union of such varied elements of greatness in any one character. There is no other instance in all history of one man being at the same time a legislator so far- seeing and judicious ; a statesman so politic and wise ; a patriot so devoted and energetic ; a general so able and valiant ; a leader so prudent ; a priest so pious ; a teacher so successful ; a friend so tender ; a relative so meek ; a ruler so decided and yet so accessible to reason. It would be idle to compare him with any character in ancient history, even those who might have boasted the greatest combination of great qualities. Any reflecting man must easily see and appreciate the almost immeasurable distance between Moses, our hero, and any hero of antiquity or of modern times. And, passing from the characters of such heroes to 4 MOSES. their careers, we shall find the distance equally great, the abyss of separation equally difficult to bridge. There is no code so original, so all- wise, so universal, so immortal, as that which Moses taught the world. Other codes are compilations. The charter of Moses was a creation. There is no social system so trium- phantly true. The revolutions of the history of society confirm the superhuman wisdom of the Mosaic dispensation. It taught the purest love in an age of rage, vengeance, and hatred. It evolved the brightest wisdom amidst clouds of ignorance and superstition — even in an era in which Knowledge was disguised in magical myths, and Faith itself shrouded in mystery. It initiated and developed institutions which have been immortal : institutions which only seemed to perish when ignor- ance was rampant, and which were seen to rise like the phoenix from the fires of destruction into a brighter "low of resurrection, when the torch of Knowledge throws its gleam on the world. It deduced order and law despite the tangle of misrule and chaotic disorder. The inexorable and unfailing testimony of fact and circumstance forces the minds of men to bear almost involuntary witness to the inspiration of its promul- gator and to the divinity of such inspiration, as thoroughly as if indeed the old llabbinical hyperbole be an historical fact — as if it be true that not alone the souls of all men then living, but the souls of all men evermore to be, stood around the base of Sinai, when the Commandments were delivered, amidst the thunders and lightnings and the Voice of the Trumpet from Heaven ! But we must be equally careful to avoid falling into 3I0SE.S. the error of believing that inspiration so transfigured the individuality of Moses that he stood absolutely above the possible imitation of less favoured men- Though the Law was diA r ine ; though the lawgiver was inspired ; though he and his faltering voice were selected for the delivery of the Law to the world ; yet let us carefully avoid the supposition that the man so favoured was himself divine. No; his inspiration was in his heart, but not always ; in his words, but not in all of them : on one or two occasions it failed to control all his actions. Because he was subject to human imperfections ; because he was so very human, it is the more easy to believe that the perfect and super- human Law which he proclaimed was not of mortal framing, but divine. Yes : and because he was so very human, from this humanity we learn a wonderful lesson. The teachings of Heaven do not reside only in prophetic utterances and in Scriptural records, but in the example of the careers of men. And thus the life of Moses in its struggles, its strivings, and its sorrows ; in its intrinsic beauty, standing in bright relief amid the shadows of his human imperfections, presents a model offered to us not alone for contemplation — not alone for admira- tion — but even for imitation. He has taught us not only b} 7 his immortal Law, but likewise by his mortal Life. And thus he stands pre-eminent among men, not only by the majesty of his mission, but also by the almost angelic, yet fully human, beauty of his character. In that character were combined the two extreme virtues of a noble nature, meekness and manliness. His meekness was substantiated by his b MOSES. sturdy manliness. His manliness was beautified by his angelic meekness. Placed high among men by the grandeur of his charge, the story of his life, and the loftiness of his character, he yet seems to move amongst us like one of us, whom we may venture to follow, and, in a humble fashion, to imitate. It is remarkable that, though he lived in times so remote, and though his destiny was so peculiar, yet his nature is thoroughly intelligible. His aspirations, his passions, and desires, nay, his very weaknesses — were colored with the fami- liar tints of those of ordinary men. His virtues, though sanctified and spiritualised, were not unreal nor im- practicable. He is indeed so very real, that it seems he might have lived amongst us yesterday, even in our common-place, every-day walk of life ; and yet he was so holy, that if we would permit our tutored fancies to fashion a pattern for resemblance, he would be the man. While, if we would allow our more etherial flights of conception to imagine an angel upon earth — that angel would be he ! We do not learn from the Scripture record, nor need we inquire, whether it was from his remarkable virtue, ability, and nobleness of character, that he was selected for his marvellous mission ; or whether the incidence of that marvellous mission communicated to him his especial grace of moral nature. In some respects the man and his mission are inseparable. Yet not in all respects. Sinai was glorified when Heaven descended on its chosen crest : yet when the Awful Presence de- parted, it remained in the cold outlines of its familiar form. Thus Moses was glorified when the fire of inspiration burned in his bosom : but when the sacred MOSES. t glow passed from hiru, lie moved in the ranks of ordinary men, spoke human words, and thought human thoughts. Yes ; though the Moses of history is essentially the Moses of the Bible ; though to us the halo of Sinai seems to rest upon his brow ; yet we can see him even through this glowing light ; and he seems to descend, at times, from the radiant path to our every-day earth, and move amongst us. We can understand him. "We can conceive that a human heart throbbed in his bosom, that human ardour glittered in his eyes ; that human hopes and fears, joys and sorrows — yes, and human passions also, formed and fretted the current of his career. May the time come when an able hand will add to the literature of England a life, written by a Jewish pen, of this extraordinary man ! Such a biography would far exceed the limits of these pages — and we have not attempted one; but it would be a work for which generations yet unborn would have reason to be grateful. All that we would do here is to call attention to that which seems strangely overlooked in these modern days — the character of Moses as a man, apart from his character as a heavenly missionary. We may infer something of the inner life-story of the un- paralleled Prophet from the suggestive references to that story which appear from time to time in the course of the Scripture narrative, from the hour which first introduces him to the sacred scene amid the tall water- plants that fringed the jSTile, till the pathetic day when that life-story is for ever parted from the narrative, with which it is so intimately blended. The second chapter of Exodus contains, alone, sufficient allusion to the character of Moses to render 8 MOSES. its beauty thoroughly intelligible. At once, in the few verses that compose this chapter, we ascertain that his nobleness of mind precluded his allowing his interests, as attached to the princely court and dominant race of Egypt, to interfere with his determination to fight the battle of his distressed brethren, and to identify himself with the cause of this abject people. No circumstance of Egyptian education, no self-interest or ambition, thus damped the ardour of his attachment to his fallen and enslaved race. His heart was not corrupted by courtly blandishments nor courtly favours. He im- perilled position, liberty, and safety, and, in fact, be- came an exile, by his spirited conduct. His manliness and hatred of injustice induced him to chastise an oppressor; his love of peace and his kindliness lead him to endeavour to part two struggling Israelites. This manly spirit of hatred of tyranny appears to actuate him when he flies to the rescue of the maidens of Midian. In each case, he is treated with ingratitude — which appears to follow his every step through life. His brethren revile him (verse 14). The Midianite damsels neglect him (verse 20). Meek and placid, he does not seek to punish the former, nor to censure the latter. Careless of the charms of ambition, he is con- tent to lead a shepherd's life in the fields of Jethro. And now we will roughly glance through some striking instances, interspersed in the Pentateuch, of the beauty of his holy nature. Chapter III. affords a remarkable testimony to his meekness and his prudence : the language of verse 11 clearly indicates no want of faith, but the reticence of his modesty and the circum- spection of calm judgment. His song in Chapter XV. proves his reluctance to attribute any glory to himself; MOSES. 9 he carefully attributes it to the Hand from which it came. Chapter XYIIL instances the readiness with which he listened to sage advice. In Chapter XXXII. he prays for his people, and even offers — himself innocent — to be punished for their sins. From this angelic sublimity of character he descends to the ordinary pale of mortality in the wild wail of despair (Numb. xi. 12, 13) with which he pleads for aid. His gentleness and self-abnegation and the absence of envy are singularly evidenced by his earnest desire that the spirit of prophecy — the real love of virtue and most direct means to moral perfection — might descend on all the people. His prayer — his heart's battle — for the pardon of this rebellious people (Xumb. xiv.) shows the sweetness and loving tendencies of his disposition. His for- giveness of his sister and brother, who even added their bitter dole to the national ingratitude, is one of the most touching instances of the heavenly forbearance of his nature. His prayer (Numb, xvii.) for the appoint- ment of a successor manifests his caution, his freedom from jealousy or envy, and his earnest patriotism. In fact, two words in Chapter XXXIV. of Deutero- nomy describe his character admirably ; Moses was Tl nig " The servant of the Lord." He served Him in fulfilling His behests; he served Him in proclaiming His Law ; he served Him in the beauty of his life ! But — as we all know — when his great work was nearly accomplished ; when he had brought his people near to the confines of the Promised Land ; when he had led them from bondage to freedom ; when he had taught them the Great Law of Life, and had laid the basis of that Tower which alone resists the shocks of foes and the attacks of ages — which alone reaches from 10 MOSES. the earth on which it stands unto the heavens by which it is crowned; — then, he died ! He did not press his weary foot on the soil for which he fought, for which he lived, for which he languished ! Oh ! Brethren of the House of Israel, who can learn so much from the story of his life, learn something also from the story of his death ! Brethren, who have in this life toiled so ardently for some Promised Land that your feet shall never touch — some Promised Land flowing with milk and honey to be gathered for yourselves, to be stored and garnered for your own ambition, and for the happiness and pleasure of your own children and your own kindred — Brethren, who perish when the borders of the Land are reached — think of his grief, his sorrow ; he who sought and strove for the Land and its abundance, not for his own sake, not for his children's sake, not for the exaltation of his name and family, but for the sake of his rebellious brethren ! And you, who can understand him better; you, who follow humbly in his footsteps, and toil for a Promised Land and for its milk and honey for the sake of your brethren, for the weak, the poor, the aged, the helpless, the young; for the generations who are to live when you shall have perished; you can in better degree sympathize with his sorrow, when the Land he was never more to see and never to touch was spread out before his eyes. But you can also sympathize with the possibility of that most divine joy which may have comforted and animated him at the last supremo moment; when life was passing away ; when the hopes of earth were fading from his heart, and the prospect of the Promised Land was fading from his dying eyes — the sublime, heavenly joy of knowing that life's great victory was won — but MOSES. 11 not for himself. No, not for himself — but for genera- tions yet unborn : for a world hidden in the future : for ages that should bless his name beyond all other men ! Moses was taken from us more than three thousand years ago. But, — " He is not dead, whose glorious mind Lifts thine on high ; To live in hearts we leave behind Is not to die." Campbell. He is with us still — still in the spirit. For his spirit, like the cloud by day and the pillar of fire by night, leads us on our way through life's tangled wilderness, teaching us duty in the daylight of joy, and showing us comfort in the night-time of adversity. Still may he lead us, the spirit of the Great Prophet — the servant of the Father whom we adore ! Guided by the Divine Law which he proclaimed, and by the sublime life which he led — both glorious and gracious gifts of Heaven to Earth — may we pass safely and trustfully amidst the foes that obstruct us, and through the perils that assail us in life's long wilderness. But, more faithful than our fathers, may we never doubt our leader's word ; more happy than that leader, may our feet press the Promised Land on earth, — or may we meet him — happier, immortally — in the Promised Land of Heaven ! ELIJAH. "I pray thee, let a two-fold portion of thy Spirit be upon me." II Kings ii. 9. As a brilliant comet flashes across the surface of the firmament, coming we know not whence, going we know not whither, mysterious in origin, nature, pur- pose, and destiny, so Elijah flashes athwart the hori- zon of Jewish History. He is a brilliant meteor among the personages of the Bible. The little we know of him has an absorbing, almost an awful interest. He, scarcely even excepting the unsurpassed and un- paralleled Moses, or the princely Abraham, is the most majestic of all the most marvellous figures of the true and varied drama, the first scene of which opened with the outburst of Nature from Chaos, and the last scene of which closed on the sacred forms of the later prophets, dejected and dispirited — } r et breathing words of hope and comfort to a fallen people. About the time at which Homer sang his stately and graceful epics, and Lycurgus framed his stern laws in Greece, this Hebrew prophet lived in Palestine. Not a hundred years had passed since the kingdom of Israel had been rent in twain by the dissensions between the tribes. The royal house of Judah still reigned at ELIJAH. IS Jerusalem. The usurping successors of Jeroboam ruled the northern provinces. Our knowledge of the history of Elijah, and our narratives of his utterances, do not come to us from his own hand, as is the case with many other prophets. There is no book of the Bible that bears his august name, or is transmitted to us as having been written or dictated by him. What we know of him comes chiefly from the First and Second Books of Kings, though, doubtless, tradition has helped the history in fashioning it in the way in which it is usually understood. In the character and the deeds of this prophet, we find that blending of mildness and majesty, that mingling of mercy with might, which marks every messenger, every message of Heaven, which in its most sublime and ineffably supreme form marks the attributes of the Godhead. The awful prophet, whose fiery thunders invoked the flames of just vengeance on the wicked and murderous pseudo-priests of Baal ; the prophet who fearlessly, with flashing eye, denounced the im- piety of tyrannic kings — Elijah, the terrible minister of divine wrath, yet bent gently and tenderly over the feeble widow's boy, and with the love of a caressing father, and the love of a comforting mother, invoked divine compassion, and prayed that the breath of renewed life might flush the pallid cheeks of the child. Yes, he, whose zealous heart was ruthless when the cause of the Lord was to be set on high, is the same hero as he, who in his heart's desolate sadness, prayed to be taken away from the struggles and sorrows of his life. For, when we remove from the history of Elijah the mysterious halo that surrounds him, we shall find in 14 ELIJAH. him, in the glimpses of his inner life, the human and not the superhuman element. Notwithstanding the miraculous circumstance of his translation and the promise of his return, Elijah was not really far different in the scope of his thoughts, his feelings, even his failings, from other men, men living in his own and in modern days. How otherwise can we explain his occasional weakness, when he prayed to be relieved of his severe and painful task ? How, other- wise, explain the impatient almost rebellious temper which he manifested when the widow reproached him. for the supposed death of her son ? Indeed, our faith in the Bible is strengthened by our appreciation of the fallibility of character occasional^ evident in those whom God selected as the vehicles of His Revelation. They were only His instruments. They were but mortals, even erring mortals. Thej^ were men like ourselves, yet men who battled with temptation, and often triumphed over it. The gentle hills of Mendip, and the rough mountain of Hecla, are alike made of dull earth, though the one lifts its silent height, clothed in pleasant verdure, and bathed in serene sunshine, while the terrible Voice of God's fiery thunder roars through the other's crest, and pro- claims His Might. Nay, even immortal Sinai, on which God's awful Presence rested, is a crag undistinguishable from the dull rough peaks that surround it in the Arabian wilds. Of Elijah's early history we know nothing. He was by birth a Gileadite, but, as the land of Gilead was divided amongst at least three tribes, it is not clear to which tribe he belonged. Gilead is a region of which very frequent mention is made in the Bible. ELIJAH. 15 It was situated on the east of the Jordan, and was a mountainous territory, yet celebrated for the excellence of its pastures. These pastures, or rather the sleekness and number of the cattle bred on them, seem to have attracted the attention of two of the tribes, the sons of Reuben and of Gad, who desired to settle in the fair and fertile land, instead of seeking " pastures new " across the Jordan.* Medicinal plants grew amidst the mountains, or in the fields of Gilead. The warlike judge, Jepthah, was a Gileadite, not only by family name, but by locality. The first call of Elijah came at a sad epoch of Jewish history. Among all the wicked successors of Jeroboam on the throne of revolted Israel, Ahab stands in shameful pre-eminence. He had a very great mis- fortune, the infliction of a wicked wife. The wretched queen, Jezebel, has gone down to posterity as a name or bye-word for female iniquity. It is singular, but not the less true, that women when wicked (which is very rare) are very wicked. Posterity has, however, done its worst for women, by adopting their names in language as personifications of the vices of which they were culpable. We talk of a Jezebel, a Xantippe, a Lucrezia Borgia, a Brinvillicrs, almost as if these were common nouns instead of proper names. Ahab was a son of king Omri, who built the capital city Samaria, and who was raised to the throne, like some of the old Roman emperors, on the shoulders of the soldiers. Ahab married, as we have said, the wicked Jezebel, daughter of the king of Sidon, a do- main situated on the north-west coast of the kingdom of Israel, and celebrated, or rather infamous, for the lNumbers xxxii. 16 ELIJAH. worship of Ashtaroth, probably the same as the Cretan Astarte, or the Roman Venus. The worship of idols was in full force in the kingdom of Israel. With furious cruelty Jezebel induced Ahab to slay the priests or pious "prophets," (probably preachers) of our sacred Faith, though some of these were saved secretly by the king's chamberlain, Obadiah, and concealed, by his care, in refuges in which he provided food for them, a circumstance which was afterwards reported to Ahab. King Ahab did not, however, punish Obadiah for it with death or disgrace, a fact which leads one to imagine that Ahab had some redeeming qualities, or that he did not reveal the secret to Jezebel, for certainly she would have hounded Ahab on to slay Obadiah. Ahab's wickedness becoming intolerable, Elijah, who now first appears on the scene, was called on to de- nounce the king, and to threaten him with a visitation of national famine and drought. Elijah was then directed to escape from the wrath of Ahab. We do not propose to give in other words the details so admirably related in the Book of Kings. The story is doubtless familiar to our readers, and no pen can give it a fraction of the force and beauty which adorn the scriptural narrative. Let us rapidly glance over the events of Elijah's career. In his retreat the fugitive was fed by ravens, a signal proof of the miraculous care by which he was preserved, a miracle which perhaps loses its intensity when we remember how, every day of our lives, greater miracles occur ; the feeding of millions of God's creatures by His tender care, manifesting itself ELIJAH. 17 in the wonders of natural reproduction, and that in- dustrial genius by which Nature becomes the comrade of Art and the servant of Utility. But Elijah was not long to dwell secluded from human society. The tender charities of home-life were yet reserved for him. From his shelter in the glens he went, by Divine direction, to the house of a poor widow in a town in the domain of Sidon, at the foot of Lebanon. There, again by miraculous provi- dence, the scanty store in the poor woman's home failed not. Her son fell sick, and apparently died. The mother in her anguish reproached the prophet, as if his presence had caused the loss of her child. Elijah himself feared that this might be so, and for once it would seem his faith wavered. But for a moment only. He invoked the help of God, and implored Him to revive the dead or dying child. And He who is mighty to strike, is merciful to save ! He who with His hand of Power dooms to destruction myriads of transgressors, yet with His hand of Pity stanches the widowed mother's tears. And who shall deny (though we cannot understand it or fathom it), that when His Hand deals death to thousands, it is as much fraught with Love as when that Hand gives new life to the dying child ! Meanwhile the atrocities of Ahab continued. Famine and drought blighted the land. Elijah, impelled by Divine Command, went towards Samaria, the royal residence of the wicked king. On his road he met the chamberlain, Obadiah, and commissioned him to ask Ahab to hasten to him. The officer naturally hesitated to " beard the lion in his den." But he yielded ; and Ahab and Elijah met. In vain the haughty tyrant c 18 ELIJAH. endeavoured to intimidate the prophet. Elijah, con- scious that he held a sublime trust, and being ever zealous in the fulfilment of his duty, disregarded Ahab's threats, reproached him boldly for his iniquities, and offered to rest his credence on a test in which he should take part on the one side, and the priests of Baal on the other. Altars were raised. The priests of Baal invoked their idol to testify his power by kindling them with superhuman fire. Their efforts were vain. They were driven to desperation by the prophet's taunts, but their impotence was manifest. Their prayers, their cries, fell powerless on the senseless ear. Then Elijah, after taking care to drench the altar with floods of water, probably lest he might be accused of obtaining fire by artificial means or trickery, called on God to vindicate His power and His prophet. The fire streamed from Heaven ! Then rang forth the cry that the one Lord united in himself all powers — D™n Mil \] : DTlWl w snn \) that cry which in the self-same words, rings year by year from the lips of the people of Israel, when the Day of Reconciliation draws to its close, and when the fire that they invoke from Heaven to complete their sacrifice is the gleaming light of Pardon ! Here let us pause, and consider the extraordinary faith of Elijah, who courageously upbraided a mighty and cruel king, regardless of the dangers he incurred, regardful only of his imperious duty. He knew well that the king had already ruthlessly slain many prophets, preachers or teachers of his faith. But he looked death calmly in the face ; and the heart that was full of faith in God and of zeal for His cause trembled not in the presence of the despot ! ELTJAH. 19 But Elijah showed a still greater proof of courage — courage, moral rather than physical. Though his bravery of spirit was clearly beyond doubt ; though, as it would seem afterwards, he did not cliug to life ; yet when he was ordered to fly for refuge and conceal- ment, he fled and hid himself. The same soul, which did not blench before a cruel monarch's throne, bowed before the will of Heaven submissively. "When ordered to imperil his life, he bravely risked it. When ordered to preserve that life, he, with equal courage, sought to save it. He "feared God and knew no other fear." He did not cling to life, but he did not know that he was not to die. It was not the foreknowledge of translation to Heaven that emboldened him to face Ahab, and to trust to the lonely and barren fastnesses in the mountains. For when this part of his work was done ; when the wicked priests of Baal had paid the penalty of their blasphemies and their crimes ; when the power of Heaven had removed the famine and the drought; there came to the prophet that which perhaps comes to many a weary worker in the world — a wish for rest and death. He had been misunderstood and unappreciated ; his labours had met with ingratitude. He had removed the burdens of affliction that rested so heavily on his country and his king, but he had been pursued with implacable vindictiveness. His life was sought ; again he fled. Worn with anxieties, yet ever willing to obey, he lifted up his voice to Heaven — and asked to die ! But, even in this supreme agony of his life — an agony from which men inferior to prophets arc not 20 ELIJAH. exempt — lie did not seek death by his own hand, nor strive to hasten it by any act of his. He only humbly sought to be relieved of a burden which he felt lay too heavy on his heart. Suicide was not a crime common to the Jews of old. Nay, it was scarcely known amongst them. Yet, the so-called noble Roman and the so-called civilized Japanese exalt that crime to the rank of a virtue. The Jew meets death with fortitude and glorified hope, now in these prosaic days on the quiet pillow, as he met it with like hope and fortitude at the martyr's stake, or on the battle-field, in the glorious days of old. Such is his confidence in the Life Giver, who proclaimed Himself MX TpK p3H1 MPH " Merciful, gracious, and long-suffering," that he thanks Him and relies on Him for both lives ; life here, life on the shores unknown. The God who takes care of us here, will surely take care of us hereafter. He is as near to us now, as He will be in the world to come ! What is there to fear ? " As through life's shadowed vale my footsteps stray, Thy Mercy smiles, Thy bounties cheer my way ; And when my spirit seeks its sacred rest, 'T will dwell in safety on Thy sheltering breast." And, when'in some few instances a Jew has perished by his own hand, in our historic days, how noble has been the self-sacrifice! Thus Eleazar the Maccabee doomed himself to death beneath the weight of the turreted elephant, in his heroic and supreme devotion ELIJAH. 21 to his country and his faith ; thus the aged Rabbi of York perished in the horrors of the besieged castle. Even Samson drew death on himself, so that the enemies of his country might perish, — unless, indeed, he drew down the building in which he stood, in the frenzy of agony. And Saul — well, as to the sin of suicide involved in his sad stoiy, let us believe that, in the touching words so familiar to us, " the recording angel dropped a tear, and blotted it out for ever ! ; ' But Elijah was not to die in the agony of his despair. His work was not yet complete. For the answer of God came to him. The roaring wind arose and pealed in ringing thunder through the trembling rocks ; the rifted mountain fell asunder, rent by the raging storm ! The earthquake cleft the plains with awful shock ! The raging fire flamed beneath the lurid sky ! But not in the thunder of the wind, nor the shock of the earthquake, nor the flash of the fire was the Lord ! But there was the sound of a still small voice : and then came the Yoice of the Lord ! Oh ! marvellous type of infinite Compassion ! We must bear the storm, and the shock, the alarms, the pains, the scathing griefs of life — but the Mercy comes at last ; and in that Mercy is God's dwelling place. Yes ! He proclaims His Might and Majestjr, it is true, in the stupendous voice of Nature, the "wreck of matter and the crash of worlds," but to us, to each of us, He speaks in the " still small voice," which is only heard in each man's inmost breast ; heard only by himself; the Yoice of Duty borne on the wings of Conscience, called into action by the mercy and grace of God. 22 ELIJAH. So the prophet was told that he had yet duties to perform, work to achieve, trusts to fulfil. But doubtless his Master had compassion on His ser- vant's weariness, and He promised him a successor, one to relieve him from his life's burden of work. And he was enjoined to select the loyal Elisha. Even in this brief episode appears one of those touches of " nature that make the whole world kin," and which abound in the Bible ; one of those " tender charities," which bring the Bible home to the heart. Elisha, in the glory of his new mission, in the pride of his triumphant exaltation, in the awful gravity of his new duties, yet asked and was allowed "to kiss his father and mother," before he parted from them — to bid his dear ones at home a tender and a loving farewell ! When next Elijah appears on the sacred scene, he had once more to confront the fierce tyrant and to reproach him for slaying and robbing Naboth; a startling instance of the wickedness of that sin of covetousness which is denounced in the tenth command- ment. Ahab dreaded Elijah, whom he idly affected to accuse of personal hostility to him ; for often, indeed, had the Tishbite appeared as an embodied Conscience, a living, a speaking vengeance ! Ahab died in the battle field, and a son scarcely less- guilty than himself succeeded him. Unwarned by the career and fate of his father, Ahaziah pursued the j^aths of idolatry. Elijah was sent to rebuke him and to advise him of his approaching death, and he was preserved miraculously for that purpose from the soldiers of Ahaziah. With this act, he seems to have accomplished his life's mission. Elijah, being conscious of his approaching departure- ELIJAH. 23 from earth, desired to spare Elislia, who loved him. so well, the pain of seeing him pass away. Or it may be that Elijah wished not to be disturbed in that supreme moment of his departure by the presence of a friend and follower whom he dearly loved, and whose affec- tion formed a tie that bound to earth the soul about to w r ing its flight to heaven. For it is a custom of our people to remove gently from the bedside of the dying, the dear ones whom they are to quit. And this is done either lest the sorrow of the living should be too severe, or lest it disturb the dying : or more likely the motive is a fear lest in that mighty moment of the soul's, farewell flight, the tender loves, the trembling hopes and fears of earth, shall mingle with the thoughts which then belong to Heaven alone. For it is not ambition, nor fame, nor avarice, nor pleasure, but Love the Immortal, that forms the last bond which anchors the captive soul to earth, before it breaks from earth for ever ! And Love is immortal. Surely, we shall meet again, in the world beyond the grave — transfigured, purified, but still remembered and beloved — the father, the mother ; the husband, the wife ; the little child — the child matured to the strength of manhood, and the graces of womanhood : ah ! all the dear ones — from whom we part in agony in this valley of the shade. The faithful follower Elisha would not leave his be- loved master in the looming approach of the supreme farewell. "Wherever Elijah went, he followed him ; and as the last moment of departure nearcd, Elisha asked — not for worldly wealth, or rank, or material inheritance — but for a twofold portion of his master's spirit. "Thou hast asked a hard thing," said Elijah, 24 ELIJAH. "but if thou seest me taken from thee, it shall be so." And then occurred that marvellous and mysterious scene, the miraculous translation of Elijah. A whirl- wind or a storm (1]}D) arose, and a chariot and horses of fire descended, and Elijah mounted this chariot, and was wafted in it to the sky. Elijah passed from earth to Heaven, and he cast his mantle on Elisha, and gave him a twofold portion of his spirit. That spirit was surely the spirit of duty done in spite of drawbacks, dislike and difficulty. A grander spirit never pervaded a human heart. It speaks to us all — to all who would fain neglect duty's trumpet-call from apathy, from love of ease, from jealousy, from ill-temper, from exaggerated bashful- ness, from indulgent tendencies to rest or pleasure ; — the many motives which urge men to be deaf to the call of duty — motives which are varied forms of selfishness. It is true that some men are too anxious to thrust themselves into the world of action and to undertake responsibilities for which they are unfitted, or to which they are urged by ambition. But others sin far more deeply in an opposite fashion, by disregard of, or indif- ference to, that " still small voice " which speaks in the recesses of the heart; which bids men take up their work and do it. Our earthly powers are given to us in trust, and our consciousness of them is the advocate of duty : " Arise for duties yet to do, Or aims achieve, or plans pursue ! For labour, life is given. Dream not, nor idly bind the hours To earthly rest by chains of flowers ; Arise ! and think of Heaven ! " ELIJAH. 4, It seems to us that the characteristic of Elijah's life was this : — He was a man of quiet modest tastes, perhaps of retiring disposition, perhaps not even an impulsively brave man, certainly not ambitious. But at the voice of duty, he was aroused. All the man- liness of his nature stood forth. Self was obliterated. Yes, regardless of self, of self-interest, of temperament and desire of ease, or even of safety, he was "zealous," and stood forth to do his duty. For he ivas strong m faith. This was his watchword. He " committed his way" trustfully to a Hand which he felt would uphold him. Miraculous and mysterious as was the departure of Elijah, it is not more miraculous and mysterious than the translation which we call death ; the ordeal through which the millions of the past have departed, and which we all await. Oh ! happy we, if when we pass away, we leave behind us, like Elijah, a twofold portion of the spirit which those whom we love have reason to desire of us ! Happy, if we lead lives of faith and duty in a spirit so righteous and strong, that those whom we leave behind — the children in the home, the children in the schools, the men and women of our own time — may pray that a twofold portion of our spirit shall rest with them. This is, " not to die." There are certain traditions connected with him. It is said, that he who sees him in dreams, he who salutes him in a vision and receives his greeting in return is a happy man. His original mission was, it is said, delivered to him by Moses. A beautiful story is related as to a visionary meeting between him and Rabbi Joshua ben Levi, when Elijah promised the 26 ELIJAH. sage that the Messianic age would be proclaimed when men deserved its advent. It may be observed that Scripture makes mention but once only (Chronicles ii.) of his prophetic powers of warning as evoked against the kings of Judah. The wicked Jehoram was then the object of his severe denunciations. The promise of the re-appearance of Elijah by Malachi — as the harbinger of the Messianic reign of peace and love, is still fondly dwelt on by our people — though how or what will be the nature of that return, we cannot surmise. Elijah's return typifies the reign of duty and unselfishness, which must prevail ere the Messiah shall come ; and he who passed from earth in the days of yore will again return to the haunts of men. On Sabbath nights, when the day of joyful rest is waning, and we stand on the threshold of the newly dawning week of work, we pray for the return of Elijah the prophet. Every night on which we celebrate the exit from Egypt by the ancient service of the ITagodah, the wine-cup is set in readi- ness for the expected Prophet. Even, in our daily grace after meals, the anticipation of his restoration is not forgotten. To dwell on this advent, and on the mode in which we may merit it, is not within our province here. Let us rather briefly gather our own lessons from the prophet's life. All have duties to perform that seem sometimes hard to us. Let us rise up, be strong, and do what is given to us to do. Not for ambition, not for fame, not for wealth, not for vain glory, but for Faith. Let us be " obedient to the Master's call," and break for the sake of Heaven the bonds that bind us to the ease and temptations of earth. The still ELIJAH. 2< small Voice speaks to us all. All of us are feci by the bountiful Hand that supplied the fugitive Prophet. All of us are called on to " labour and to wait." All of us can so govern our spirit that others may ask us for its inheritance, when we shall pass away. Many are the tyrannies and the falsehoods with which we have to struggle. True, indeed, that when we shall have to pass away, we cannot anticipate a glorified translation from earth to heaven. We cannot expect the glowing chariot and horses of fire to bear us from this world to the world unknown. No ! we must await the resurrection of the dead in the cold embraces of the lonely grave. We must pass away in the faint- ness, perhaps in the pain and struggle, of death. But, may that supreme hour of death not pass in the crash of the tempest, the throb of the earthquake, the flash of the fire. Not then may the Message come to us. But, in the still small voice of the tranquillised heart, the conscience satisfied ; the voice that speaks of a life's labour of duty, fearlessly achieved by the strength of Faith triumphant over self: thus may the message come ! Yes, thus, God of the living and the dead, may we fall asleep trustfully and quietly under the shadow of Thy protection, as a child in the arms of its mother ! JOSIAH. History often repeats itself. We find in two countries and two ages similar historical events, brought about by similar circumstances, and leading to like results ; and, perhaps, more frequently we find at different periods, and in different countries, personages pos- sessing strongly marked points of resemblance in their characteristics or their conduct. For instance — and one or two examples will suffice for our present purpose — Alexander of Macedon and Charles XII. of Sweden, were strangely alike. So were Talbot, the hero of the Anglo-French war of the Plantagenets, and Nelson, the hero of the Anglo-French war of the present century. And a striking resemblance exists between the early life and character of King Josiah, and Edward VI. — though unfortunately the career of the British boy-king was untimely closed. In the " thoroughness " of Josiah's nature, as evidenced by his acts, we find a marked analogy to the disposition of the noble Alfred, probably, not even excepting William III., the greatest and best man that ever wore the British Crown. If Edward Tudor had lived to man- hood, he might have resembled Alfred also — at least if one may judge from the piety and strength of mind he manifested, until physical suffering and the prostra- tion resulting from failing powers led him to yield to the pertinacitj'- of the ambitious and astute counsellors, JOSIAH. 29 who surrounded him with their cajoleries and their intrigues. Josiah, like Edward VI., was the son and successor of an evil-minded father. A modern historian, oppo- sing tradition, and denying the authenticity of long- recognised narratives, has represented Henry VIII. in a more amiable light than that in which earlier historians have depicted him ; though even Shakespeare, notwithstanding his anxiety to please Queen Elizabeth, cannot avoid leaving an impression that the "bluff king Harry " was a very disagreeable personage. However, as to the wickedness of Amon, the father of Josiah, there can be no doubt. The Bible expresses itself in terms of strong reprobation of Anion's career; and certainly, Josiah came to the throne under a black cloud — under inauspicious circumstances — because he succeeded a father deservedly execrated. The virtues of Amon's ancestor, the good king Hezekiah, had unhappily left no enduring harvest ; for all that he had done with the view of restoring the ancient and holy worship of Israel had been undone by the atrocious and audacious wickedness of his im- mediate successors. History does not record from what source Josiah received his good impressions, nor how it came to pass, whether from divine, or as it is called " innate," impulse, or from early education, or from wise surroundings, that he became attached to the princi- ples of morality and religion which his father and his people had ruthlessly abandoned. But as the Bible makes special mention of the name of his mother, Jedidah, the daughter of Adaiah, it may be possible that Josiah, like other good and great men, owed to his mother the inculcation of the virtues that took root 30 JOSIAH. in his young heart. The sacred influence of a good mother, " unseen but not unfelt," is the hallowed source whence flows the golden stream of many a noble life ! It is probable that the undisturbed accession of Josiah to his father's throne was facilitated by the attachment of the Jews of Southern Palestine to the dynasty of Judah — the line of their ancient kings — or, perhaps, by their loyal attachment to fixed and duly constituted monarchical authority. Their character was more akin to that of the Englishman than to the disposition of the Frenchman of the present day. We are told that, notwithstanding the wickedness of Amon, which led to his being assassinated by some members of his own household, his murderers were duly punished, and his son succeeded him. Amon perished very much after the fashion of the Czar Paul, of Pussia. He was, like him, slain in his own palace by persons of his own establishment, and his violent death was the result of a conspiracy — just as in the case of the Emperor Paul. But the regicides were seized and put to death, and the hereditary succession was secured by the immediate elevation of his little son, Josiah, to the vacant throne. From these facts, brief as is their record, one may gather a fair idea of the political status of the land at this epoch, and of the national charac- teristics of the Jewish people. There was no prevailing lawlessness, no anarchy, no change of dynasty, no violent revolution. Had such events occurred in modern days, or in other climes, the chances are that the result of the conspiracy would not have been the tranquil elevation of a young child to his murdered father's throne. We find, for JOSIAH. 31 instance, that the overthrow of Charles I. and James II. in England, and of the first Napoleon and Louis Philippe in France, all of whom left youthful heirs, was followed by the overthrow of the dynasty to which those ill-fated monarchs respectively belonged. The crown taken from the father was not given to the son. Even in cases in which an infant heir succeeded, there have usually been anarchy and usurpation. We need not ransack English and French history for parallels or analogies. In Poland, when the young Boleslas suc- ceeded the virtuous Lesko, the White ; in Holland, when the great William, afterwards King of England, succeeded his father as Prince of Orange, disturbances ensued. In Judea, however, it seems that no revolu- tion, no intrigue, interfered with the hereditary trans- mission — at least, none is recorded. The salutary and judicious constitutional influences of the Mosaic code of political government prevailed, even though wicked monarchs had overthrown, or at least abandoned, that code of religious government. The liberties and laws of the country were maintained under circumstances of exceptional difficulty, and the boy-king, Josiah, suc- ceeded peacefully to the throne which his father had disgraced, but not enfeebled. This result materially speaking, seems due to the steady temper of the people, 'h i"D5^ Dyn n#« " Happy is the people whose portion is such." One is disposed to believe that at this period of Jewish history, the nation itself would not have been prone to idolatry, if it had not been under the influence of idolatrous kings. Anyhow, it would seem clear that the counsellors, who surrounded the youthful Josiah, led him to religious courses, and the infliction of the lev talionis on the murderers of his 32 JOSIAH. father, is a testimony of attachment to the established principles of Jewish law. It is not unlikely that the character and career of another royal youth, Josiah's remote ancestor, David, the minstrel king, influenced the young monarch. Might not Josiah, fired by David's example, have taken his progenitor as his model? Having once adopted the right course for his line of conduct, he pursued it with steadfast consistency and earnestness. We may even infer from the language of the Bible that adverse influences were not wanting to divert him from the straight path which he had chosen. "He turned not aside to the right hand nor to the left." Certainly, the wonderful steadfastness of his character presents a marked contrast to the vacillation of many monarchs of his line. Even David and Solomon were not stead- fast in the pursuit of virtue throughout their chequered careers. Hezekiah had his weak moments ; Manasseh was not unchangeable even in his wickedness. Josiah, even from this point of view, was a remarkable person- age and prince. Josiah was nearly of the age at which Edward Tudor died, when he took the great work of reforma- tion in hand — he was a boy of fifteen. At this period it would seem that the strength of his character began to develop itself. One of his biographers described him as an " amiable prince." We confess that amiability does not seem to be one of the specially prominent traits of his disposition, though in common experience we do find that amiability and strength of character are often combined. Superficial observers and epigram- matic talkers indulge in the hackneyed notion that good temper and firmness are incompatible. This JOSIAH. 33 sententious diagnosis is faulty. Its error arises from mistaking weakness for amiability, and grimness or obstinacy for firmness. Josiah was very young when lie assumed the reins of government in Judea and, like Louis XIV. the motto .of his reign was at once, " L'etat c'est moi." His first step — and this was the great object of his whole career — was to make war against the idolatrous practices of his people. The task was protracted and difficult ; idolatry was no new importation ; it was the besetting sin of the nation. The idolatrous practices of the two preceding reigns had caused this heinous sin to sink so deeply into the popular mind, that it was not easy to root it out. Idols, heathen temples, and other monuments of pagan rites were teeming — to use a recognised modern expression — from end to end of the land. The ignorant populace clung to a personal deity ; the people were satisfied with an image or a picture. They were, it would seem, unable to satisfy themselves with the grand conception of an unseen, an impersonal, an intangible deity. Debased as they were, they were unable to grasp and adopt the sublime idea taught by the great Prophet of God. Possibly in those daj 7 s, as in ours, there were scholars who fancied that Faith must be subservient to Reason — or, at least, to what they mistook (honestly enough, no doubt) for Reason — and who declined to believe what they could not understand, nay, what they could not touch or see : who considered their own opinions paramount, and who, like some philosophers, and even some clergymen in our own days, set up idols of their 34 JOSIAH. own manufacture or adoption under various names, and worshipped them ; so their prototypes in those bye- gone times chose to set up their idols, and worship them, rather than join in paying glorious homage to the unseen God of Faith. Many religions, however, are overthrown, enfeebled, even forgotten ; but the philosophers, and the graduates, and the sages of the new school, have not succeeded in overthrowing even the most minute particle of influence of the one Reli- gion which has lasted through all the ages, and which bears its elements of strength in itself. Possibly another circumstance may account for the extraordinary spread of idolatry. It is true that nearly three hundred and fifty years before the accession of Josiah the separation between the tribes had been effected by a revolution, or rather a civil war, and South Judea remained under the sacred dynasty of Judah, while a recreant kingdom established itself in North Judea, under the mutinous usurper, Jeroboam. The northern kingdom succumbed to the invasion of the Assyrian king, Shalmaneser, possibly the father of the celebrated Sennacherib. Many of the Israelites were deported wholesale after the fashion of the forced emigrants of the highly civilized Russian empire. It is said that their lands were for the most part expro- priated, and given to non-Jews, or to neighbouring people who followed a certain perverted Judaism. These transplanted nations followed certain Jewish customs, even though they were likewise addicted to idolatry. Their religion was a curious mixture of Judaism and heathenism, and it is just this description of mongrel creed which may have had some effect in importing idolatry into the neighbouring districts of JOSIAH. 35 the kingdom of Judah, as well as among the Jews remaining in the kingdom of Israel. The conquest of Shalmaneser occurred about a cen- turj r before Josiah succeeded to the throne of Judah. Then the kingdom of Israel, as it is historically called, came to an ignominious and utterly inglorious end. In those days national iniquity was punished by almost immediate retribution. This is scarcely the case now- a-days. Now it is probable that either the conquered Jews had returned to the northern provinces of Judea in the days of Josiah, or that his sway, or at least his influence, extended over the new settlers, or that he had some delegation or suzerainty, tributary or other- wise, from the Assyrian king, for it would seem certain that Josiah exerted monarchical authority over the severed provinces of Israel, as well as over the heredi- tary kingdom of Judah. Josiah set to his work right zealously. His was a j)olicy of " thorough," resembling in its manner, though not in its matter, the policy associated with the name and career of the ill-fated "Wentworth, Lord Strafford. Henry VIII.'s hearty warfare against the monas- teries and conventual establishments of the Church of Rome, was a faint shadow of Josiah's expeditions against the idolatrous edifices, practices, and priests that disgraced the land. He gave no quarter. He lifted a vigorous and unsparing hand against the various forms of pagan worship then prevailing in Palestine, and which do not seem to have been confined to its borders, but either (as is probable) to have been imported thither by foreign settlers, or gathered from 36 JOSIAH. intercourse with neighbouring nations. Many of these forms appear to have had their prototypes in other climes and ages, and among other races. Josiah, the great iconoclast, was the Julian of an earlier day. An examination of the various forms of idolatry is curious ; and though these seem to have been assailed at various portions of Josiah's reign, we may mention (and dis- miss) them here. Paramount seems to have been that Sabean worship, or adoration of the heavenly host (tf!3¥, perhaps connected with "OV, splendour) which existed in Mesopotamia in the days of Abraham, and which, in the form of the Parsee creed, exists in India and Persia to the present day. This is, perhaps, the most explicable form of idolatry among ignorant men, Avhich quality may perhaps explain its long endurance and its wide diffusion. It spread into the Cretan my- thology of Greece and Rome, in the worship of Helios or Apollo, and of Selene or Diana ; it spread into the Teutonic or Saxon mythology, where Sun and Moon were adored. It was akin to the fire-worship of the Guebres among the ancient Persians ; it was found among the gentle Peruvians, under the Incas, when they were conquered by the cruel Spaniards ; it found its most foolish form in the Moloch worship of Canaan, and the Vestal worship of Greece and Rome. A pos- sible verbal connection between the roots of the words, Par-see, Per-u, Ter-sia, and the Greek Pi'tr (whence our English word fire, through the Teutonic Feuer) has attracted attention, just as the association between Inca and Ign-is. There was then the worship of Baal, the Bel, and Belus of other countries, possibly the Vulcan of Crete. There was also the grove- worship, known to the pagans of Northern Scandinavia, and which, perhaps, JOSIAH. ot was akin to the worship of Pan and the sylvan deities, and the worship of the Dryads of Rome and the Druids of Britain — the horrid and pestilent phallic worship, which seems linked, through Moloch, to the idolatry in which human sacrifices played a prominent part, as even now in the Polynesian and Melanesian islands. Then there was a worship connected with sepulchres, or tumuli, or heaps of stones, or " barrows," with which the Druidical worship, if Stonehenge be any proof, was also connected. There was the worship of Astoreth or Ashtoresh, said to be the Isis or Osiris of the Egyptians, the Astarte of the Greeks, and the Yenus, or possibly the Vesta, of the Romans ; of Chemosh, who we are disposed to believe was the Mars of Rome, and the Odin of the Teutons, the warlike character of the Moabites offering some grounds for this supposi- tion; and in Jeremiah, chap, xlviii., verses 7, 13, and 46, special reference is made to Chemosh, of the Moabites, and one of the places in which the idol was worshipped was Aroer, a word, perhaps, akin to Ares, the Hellenic name of Mars ; and lastly of Milcom, the idol of Ammon, possibly the Jupiter of the Greeks. But the fire-worship had been audaciously introduced into the very precincts of the Temple itself. Josiah's first work was to purify the Temple or what remained of it, to rebuild what had fallen into ruins, to restore it for purposes of divine worship, to furnish it anew with the vessels and appliances used in its sacred service. For this sublime object, a suitable system of labour, duly divided, was carefully organised. Doubtless these were not forced corvdes, such as a tyrannical sovereign might institute, but the free work of a free people : 38 JOSIAH. such as in later days was established by the noble satrap, Nehemiah, for a similar object, and such as Paris witnessed for a less sacred but not less patriotic purpose in days in which patriotism had not fled from that dejected city. Even the Levites were called on for their share of the work — not by manual labour, with hod, chisel, hatchet, or plane, but by acting as clerks of the works, overseers, accountants. &c. ; there were no drones in Josiah' s hive. Josiah seems to have been a frugal and judicious prince, and in this respect Edward VI. did not resemble him. Edward's econo- mical grandfather, Henry VII., had a touch of him. He did not lavishly spend the money of the State, nor the revenues of the Crown (if it had any) for the requisite purposes of renovation and restoration. Possibly the national exchequer was empty, and the financial condition of a perhaps impoverished country would not have justified the imposition of heavy burdens. But collectors were set to work. Money was gathered in, not only from the inhabitants of Judah itself, but from the tribes that had formed the shattered kingdom of Israel. So Josiah not only re- established the neglected national worship, but took care that those who had destroyed it should pay for its restoration. In the course of the repairs, the Scroll of the Law, which had been preserved in the Temple, but which had been lost or neglected during the reigns of Manasseh and Anion, was found and brought to the king. Shaphan, the royal scribe or secretary, read it to the monarch, whose excellent intentions were confirmed by it. He resolved to carry out its ordi- nances persistently, and proceeded to act on the pre- JOSIAH. 39 scriptions of rc^al duty as laid down in the book of Deuteronomy. The law was solemnly read to the people ; but when the king heard the awful denuncia- tions of the inspired law-giver against national dis- obedience — the curses hurled on the recusants — his strong heart quailed. Fearless in the sight of man, he trembled beneath the frown of angry Heaven. For indeed, Heaven's just indignation threatened his people. A thousand years ago that law had been given, those anathemas had been launched, those terrible but sublime warnings — terrible and sublime as the welkin thunder — had been uttered. Those menaces were spread over the serenity and sweetness of the Religion of Love and Compassion, as the angry storm-cloud darkens the bright face of the soft summer sky. The echoes of the tempests of Sinai resounded in the ear of the alarmed and patriot king ; for his people had sinned grievously. They had incurred the fearful penalties of the outraged Law. For himself, he had little to fear ; he had done his duty. He had followed the divine behest. But the people in his own time — in the time of his father and grandfather, three generations, had committed the fatal iniquities, which, by the unerring voice of Heaven, were to be visited with the appalling chastisements revealed to the prophet Moses. Under these impressions, he still felt some doubt as to whether those penalties might be averted, or whether he had removed all danger of their incidence by his own restoration of the ancestral worship. He called his council together ; and they decided on consulting a woman, who was celebrated at that time for what is termed " prophecy." Her name was Huldah. 40 JOSIAH. Here let us pause a moment, to refer to two errors that seem to prevail, even amongst Jews themselves, in respect to, first, the meaning of the word prophet, and secondly, the position of women in the Jewish sj-stem. Both these considerations are applicable to the episode of Huldah. As regards prophecy, a notion seems to prevail that a prophet is primarily, a revealer of the future. This we doubt. The English word prophet is derived from the Greek irpo^rjixl, probably meaning, one who speaks out or proclaims, rather than one who predicts. The prefix pro in Greek commonly means before, in point of place, nearly corresponding to the French decant. The Hebrew word ^^J seems to have a like meaning. Its radix is doubtless the stem-word, ^13, meaning, to sprout out, to bear fruit, (of course spontaneously, by innate power, as does the tree or plant) and, thence, to speak out, to speak eloquently (e-loquor). (This 113 by the way has, perhaps, travelled west-ward in such forms as knopf, knqp, knob, the bud or the button of a tree.) Thus the French word, derived from prcdico, is Prcdicatcur, a preacher — one who speaks out ; one who speaks eloquently — or at least, ought to do so. A prophet seems to be a man, from whom the fruit bursts forth without an effort of his own will ; one inspired w T ith the divine afHatus, so that he may speak pro- ducticehj, not necessarily one who foretells. The old English sooth-sayer, or truth- speaker, is akin to this. Even the English seer, which corresponds with the Hebrew niPl, does not necessarily mean a foreteller. Indeed, many so-called prophecies are not foretellings. They are utterances, springing forth to be culled, like fruit. If this were well understood we should, JOSIAH. 41 perhaps, cease to hear statements of Christological writers, as to the application of certain " prophetic " passages in Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel. The so-called prophecies are either codes (Moses), recommendations (Samuel), denunciations (Isaiah), exhortations (Micah), visions (Ezekiel), narratives (Jonah), elegies and dirges (Jeremiah), or lastly fore- tellings (Isaiah). Eloquence directed to such objects as denunciations, exhortations, and lamentations, often assumes the aspect of prophecy : and indeed, much of what is commonly designated prophec}* - is blended with other writings or utterances of the inspired poets and preachers of the Bible. The prophets certainly spoke from "lips touched by hallowed fire," and poured out the words that were given to them ; words that might often be the out- risings of a knowledge of the past, and the clear com- prehension of the present, by an intelligent and cultivated mind. They may sometimes have been the setting-forth in clear language of inferences drawn from a just and palpable appreciation of passing events, of the action and character of existing personages, and from a similar appreciation of the past and fore-judg- ment of the future. Yet prophecy as recorded in the Bible differed from such intellectual manifestations as above set forth, in this respect; that Prophecy was inspired, breathed into, and impelling heart, brain, lip, and hand, by the Divine Will, for the carrying out of purposes necessary in the divine scheme in its relation to man. A prophet was no ordinary man. His thoughts and utterances, his sentiments and his writings, were controlled by the Heaventy fiat. All that the prophet had to say or to write, and even all 42 JOSIAH. that he thought, was bounded by the limits defined by- hallowed intention for the achievement of some im- portant and, of course, sacred purpose. Another lesson is taught by the history of Josiah. It is the fashion of superficial observers to state that women were disregarded in the Jewish coimnonwealth, and held as of no account. It was the interest of Christians to promulgate and proclaim this view, as it afforded them an opportunity of offering Christianity to the world, as a necessary agent for the placing of women in their proper position in humanity. Superficial observers and writers confounded the treatment of women among the Jews with that which they met with among Moslems and heathen nations of the East. This is a mistake. Women held a high position in the Jewish commonwealth. Of this there can be no doubt. The Jews exalted the household virtues in womankind ; and, in one of the most esteemed of the Jewish Scripture books, a homely matron is described as the most blessed of women. Work, it is true, is always held in high repute among the Jews. And, in intellectual and spiritual rank, the women of Israel had the same chance of obtaining distinction. We had, it is true, no "screaming sisterhood," but we had amongst us the poetess Miriam, the judge Deborah, the prophetess Huldah. It is clear that Huldah is held in high repute. She lived, according to the Authorised Version, in the " College," and according to Dr. Benisch's rendering, in the " second quarter," perhaps, the arrondissement designated as No. 2, in the topo- graphical description of the city. She was the wife of the Keeper of the Wardrobe. The King's council, on hearing the doubts and JOSIAH. 43 difficulties that exercised the royal mind, decided on applying to this celebrated woman. She gave a reply to the question submitted to her in plain, explicit, forcible, and telling language. In vain did the King in his strong-minded goodness hope that his virtues would save his iniquitous people. O no ! Vicarious atonement forms no portion of God's system. The Almighty Himself told His chosen prophet, Moses, that even he, good and self-denying as he was, could not save others from the consequences of their sin. Throughout scripture, there is perhaps no prophecy or utterance delivered in terms more forcible and more touching than those in which Huldah expressed herself when appealed to by the ministers of Josiah, on behalf of this earnest and anxious king. She cries with terrible strength, yet with serene calmness that gives point to every word of her enthusi- astic reply, that the chastisement ordained by God shall fall on the guilty people who had forsaken the One Lord, and had provoked Him. His anger would be kindled against them ; and it would not be quenched. We can imagine the fire of denunciation and menace flashing from Huldah's eyes ; flashing and then fading — as those fiery eyes became filled with a woman's tender tears — when she tells the King's envoys that, since Josiah's heart was humble and gentle; since he had sought divine compassion by Ms life's obedience ; she knew that God would save him from seeing the misery and terrible punishment of the people whom he loved. This trouble would not fall en him ; Josiah would be gathered to his grave in peace ! And to those who work and struggle for a good purpose, what greater reward can there be than — Peace ! 4-1 JOSIAH. Still, the good monarch made one effort to avoid the impending wrath. He gathered the people together and read the law to them, while standing on a raised platform or pulpit. Here, Josiah solemnly promised to obey the divine law as revealed by Moses. The priests, the prophets, and the people surrounded him in vast multitude, as he stood puominently forward in the wide courts of the Temple. There, amongst rich and poor, noble and humble, the King set forth his solemn compact with the King of Kings ! He passed through the land resolved to root out idolatry ; and after having performed his work in his hereditary provinces of Judah, he passed on to the kingdom of Israel. A curious incident and a prophecy, in the sense in which the word is commonly under- stood, are narrated in the First Book of Kings, when the rebellious Jeroboam built idolatrous altars, and was rebuked by a prophet, who himself having sinned, perished, and was buried by a second prophet, whose remains, at his own desire, were afterwards laid in the tomb of his friend. The destruction of the idolatrous altar and the advent of the good Josiah were then foretold. The prophet prayed that his bones might not be dis- turbed ; and one is forcibly reminded of the curious distich engraved on Shakespeare's tomb in Stratford-on- Avon church, which runs something like this : — " Blessed be he who guards these stones, And curst be he who moves my bones." "Well, centuries afterwards, Josiah in the course of his expedition northward, came to this very place. JOSIAH. 45 He saw the altar, which he destroyed, and which, or near which, was a sepulchre built on a hill somewhat after the fashion of a beacon. He asked what it meant; and the story was related to him, for it would seem that he knew little of the history of his own race. The King refused to disturb the bones of the prophet. Here, by the way, occurs another of the oft-recurring instances of the faultiness of the so-called Authorised Version, according to which Josiah, on beholding the building, is made to ask, absurdly enough, " what is this title ? '* Now j^V is the Hebrew word used, and it means a monument, or signal, (perhaps, the stem- word of the Latin sign-um whence English sign and signal, and probably it is akin to the Teutonic zeichcn, whence our English " token," and also to " zeuge") It is pos- sible that the translator mistook the word monumen- tum for munimentuni, and hence rendered it " title." Dr. Benisch puts the word in its proper meaning. |V¥ or J*% is used for a sepulchral monument in Jeremiah xxxi. 21, and Ezekiel xxxix. 15. Josiah either went or sent to Samariah, the capital of the revolted and subdued tribes, and here he destroyed the apparatus of idolatrous worship, and condemned its wicked priesthood to capital punishment. Throughout the length and breadth of the land, the feast of Passover was solemnly celebrated. Never since the days of the Judges had the festival been held so satisfactorily. The bondage of idolatry had been broken, there was a new redemption in the land, and it was indeed fitting that it should be sanctified by the memorial of the old redemption. Ah ! if the old man who died alone and untended by human hand on solitaiy Nebo, could have seen, with prophetic eye, the king of 4G J0S1AH. his race cany out the precepts of his law, the blessed vision may have soothed his heart, as he sank to rest in sight of the promised land his foot should never tread ! "Ah ! If the fading eye, with conscious gaze, In the last hour that ends our earthly days. Could catch the vision of our hopes fulfilled, The spirit's farewell shriek would sure be stilled." The prescribed ordinances of the Passover were carried out with due precision. Josiah's powers of organization would seem to have developed ; for some time before, when he carried out the work of renovating the Temple, it would appear that the royal administra- tion must have been at a low ebb, seeing that no accounts were kept of the monies expended in the work, implicit confidence being placed in the honesty and economy of the persons charged with the undertaking. But now Josiah was in the vigour of his young man- hood. He was about 26 or 27 years of age. He re- organized the ancient Temple-service with care and order. The priests, the Levites, the singers, all had their assigned duties ; even the porters at the gates (for there was the grand institution of \212& even in those days) had their parts set forth. The poor were not forgotten ; ample provision was made for them. Men of rank and wealth came forward liberally with the contributions required of them. Judah and Israel, long separated, were again united in this solemn assembly. It is sublime to dwell for one moment on this grand scene, the climax of Josiah's glory — the crowning joy of his reign — the golden harvest of his labours. There, in the restored Temple, stood the scion of the most JOSIAH. 47 truly royal house of all the world — for Heaven had made it royal. There stood he, surrounded by the princes and the priests, the sages and the saints. Round him pressed the throng of his own subjects : and the scattered and subdued remnants of the rebellious tribes. Thousands of bleating sheep, hundreds of lowing oxen, wreathed with their myrtle garlands, were led to the altar. The songs of David resounded from the lips of the hallowed choir. The spirit of the Minstrel King, the spirit of the wise Solomon and the sainted Hezekiak, lived with beatified life in the solemn enclosure. Surely, as the song of welcome rose on high, above the hushed murmurs of the people and the cries of the cattle, the voices of the dead must have whispered at the king's heart ! But no. His heart might have been proud and peaceful, but it could not have been joyful. There was a shadow on the sunshine. The pious and resolute king had made his peace with Heaven, but he knew that on the might} 7 throng before him the just wrath of that outraged Heaven must fall. Yes ; fall sooner or later with unerring, even though tardy hand. Hush ! Beyond the clashing of the cymbals and the braying of the trumpets; beyond the choral songs of the Levites and the psalmody of the people ; lie heard the distant roar of the thunder. It reached his heart; he felt the whisper of the coming storm — though before its blast should burst on his people, he would be at rest in the peaceful grave. * * # * * And now a new scene opens. Life's hey-day has been reached. Noon has shone in its meridian glory, 48 JOSIAH. and the day begins to wane. Josiah lias passed from boyhood to manhood. He is advancing to life's prime, and the darkness is closing around him. In those days, no such theory as the balance of power existed. Tn our days it is only a theory, a name for lust of power, and greed of annexation. Josiah was the sovereign of a small state, wedged in between two powerful and ambitious empires. It had something of the position of the Netherlands in our own days, wedged in between Prussia and France. These powerful ancient empires on the borders of Palestine, were Egypt on the south-west, Assyria, or rather Babylon, on the east. These jealous rivals were at war, just as France was in our own days, and in the days of our fathers. Egypt attacked Assyria. The then king of Egypt was called Nccho. He was of the dynasty called Pharaoh, and is also known in history as Necao and Nechos. He is celebrated not only for his battles with Assyria, but also for an unsuccessful attempt made by him to unite the Mediterranean, the Nile and the Red Sea, by means of a canal, a sort of foreshadowing of Lesseps' famous Suez Canal. King Josiah decided on endeavouring to prevent JSTecho from passing through his territories, to attack the Assyrian king at Charchemish. It seems the fashion in histories based on the Bible to blame him for this procedure, and the chief grounds for this censure, appear to be that the Egyptian king, in endeavouring to prevent Josiah from allying himself with his enemy, used scriptural warnings, couched in scriptural language. He invoked the divine name to prevent Josiah 's inter- ference. It appears that Necho did this unjustifiably, JOSIAH. 49 for he was eventually defeated by the Assyrians, as we learn from Jeremiah. It was clearly the interest of Necho, that Josiah should take no part in the quarrel, for had he been neutral, he could have passed through Josiah's do- minions without molestation, and thus reached the Euphrates which was to the east of the Assyrian king's territory. If Necho invaded Assyria from the south, and Josiah were hostile, he would have been in a perilous position. Necho sought to obtain not his alliance, but his neutrality. Josiah might have considered himself bound to fight for Assyria from ties of gratitude if, as we conjecture, Assyria had permitted Josiah the privilege of spreading Judaism and destroying idolatry among the provinces of Israel, which had been conquered by the Assyrians. This conjecture would account for Josiah's friendliness to the Assyrian king, and for the influence he had in rooting out idol worship in the ten northern tribes, which he could scarcely have effected without Assyria's sanction. It may seem strange that so many thousand years after Josiah's death, one should endeavour to find out good reasons for his course of action. But there is a justification for this. We are anxious to vindicate his character, and show him in the light of a patriot king, so that he may serve, as we believe he should, as a great example for after ages. The Egyptian army met the Jewish army at a place called Megiddo, which was in a valley to the east of the range of mountains, known as Carmel, in the province of Issachar, a district afterwards forming part of the Roman province of Galilee. Near the E 50 JOSIAH. valley was a river, which is the waters of Megiddo, mentioned in the song of Deborah. This place was situated to the north-west of Jerusalem, and would probably lie in the way of JSTecho, who in passing through the Holy Land to invade Assyria, would be anxious to have a sea-board in his flank, so that he might be protected in his march by the parallel course of the Egyptian navy, a plan pursued in after ages by a modern general, and somewhat similar to that of the Duke of "Wellington in the Peninsula. This Megiddo is probabty the Magdoluni mentioned by Herodotus as the site of a battle. The patriot king, actuated by no sordid ambition, as we believe, went like a hero into the thick of the battle. He disguised himself, so that he might take active part in the fight, and share the fortunes of his soldiers — and he died —died striving to do his duty to the country he loved. So Judas Maccabeus died — so our own English Nelson died. So have perished the army of heroes that have lived since the world began, almost in every age, in every race, in every clime. " Whether it be on scaffold high, Or in the battle's van, The noblest death for man to die, Is when he dies for man." It seems that Josiah was shot by an archer, and he knew that his wound was severe, perhaps mortal. Probably, fearing that the sight of his death would operate unfavourably on his arnry, and produce dis- comfiture, he desired his attendants to take him from his chariot, and place him in another, possibly one not JOSIAH. 51 bearing signs of his royal dignity, so that he might not he known. "Take me away,""" said the dying king, "for I am sorely wounded." It seems that he died on the field of battle : for the apparent discrepancy between II. Kings xxiii., and II. Chronicles xxvi., 24, is explicable, the latter which is probably only a record, may be thus translated : "They Drought him to Jerusalem, for he was dead," or it even may be when he was dead. Josephus and one or two other writers state that he did not die till he reached Jerusalem. It matters not. He died like a hero, wherever he died. This is the end of his life's story, though that life- story cannot be said ever to end, when its recollection still lives for a purpose : " To live in hearts we leave behind, Is not to die." He was "mourned" by the great poet, patriot, and prophet, Jeremiah, who was a son of the Hilkiah, men- tioned in an earlier part of this narrative as the high priest. Jeremiah's elegy has not been identified, though possibly it may be the celebrated " Lamentations," or it may form a portion of these. The 10th verse of the 12th chapter of Zechariah, is also an elegy on the good king: " And tears by bards and heroes shed, Alike immortalise the dead ! " His people wept for him, as well they might : and the conquering Egyptian paid respect to his memory or 8 Probably the correct translation, judging from the use of the -word "Oy in the next verse, is "remove me, let me bo changed from one chariot to another." 52 JOSIAH. to the popular feeling, by placing his son on the vacant tli rone. He perished in the 30th year of his age, and the thirty-second of his glorious reign. The period of his- tory is cotemporaneous with that in which Draco gave laws to Athens, and in which the regal government existed in Rome, about the epoch of the reigns of the kings Ancus Martius, and Tarquinius Priscus. Archi- damus was reigning in Lacedacmon. The story is long : let the moral be short. From the history of Josiah, young and old may learn 111 it this king, the most manly king of Judah, was also the most religious; that he who was not afraid of crushing the old idolatries, and acknowledging his own faith, and who scrupulously observed its institutions, was also not afraid to risk his life in battle, for what he believed to be his duty. He was earnest, he was straightforward, he was thorough. Earnestness, piety, and courage, are virtues that all may imitate ; and after the lapse of twenty-five centuries, the history of Josiah speaks to us from the grave where he was laid, when he perished at Megiddo — perished, on that battle- field ; to be a signal and a beacon on life's great battle- field for ever ! NEHEMIAH. There is an evil, a crying evil, in our community. We disregard the great men of our own race. Not the great men of modern times, of whom both absolutely and relatively there are but few ; but the great men of ancient times — men who have left behind them their work, the enduring record of their lives and their labours, — so that for our neglect of them, while we profit by what they achieved, we have no excuse. A people that ceases to honour its great men, ceases to regard its past with befitting reverence, and risks its own chance of greatness. It is no small part of the work done by the heroes of other days, that their lives are examples to be followed by generations yet unborn. But we Jews allow the dull cold waters of indifference to wash over the footprints of the men of our race. We follow, it may be, their guiding lights, but we forget — oh, we utterly forget the hands that kindled them. In the upper classes of life, we Jews are familiar with the mythological and historical heroes of Greece and Home, and with the shining luminaries of our European orbit. In the lower classes these names may be but little known, but the heroes of the drama and the romance are thoroughly appreciated. Thus in our public schools our boys are able to talk glibly of the beauty of Homer's verse, the magnanimity of Leonidas' 54 NEHEMIAH. heroism — the humour of Terence, and the bravery of Scipio, and the statesmanship of Pitt and the vigour of Wellington. In our humble schools, doubtless, the deeds of Nelson and the exploits of Napoleon are not unknown : and the fanciful performances of Jack iSheppard and Dick Turpin are familiar as household words. But how often do we hear of those men whose lives were of themselves sufficient to dignify — to en- noble — nay even to consecrate, a nation? — men who like Joshua the dauntless general, David the sublime poet, Ezra the zealous champion, and Judas the heroic patriot, — and these are but few of the immortal many — have set on the face of the ages a glowing stamp of lustrous light, in whose rays we bask : though we carelessly cast aside the line that would lead the eyes of grateful and reflecting men to the source whence the radiance flows ? The consequences of this evil are perilous. We, as Jews, cease, and have long ceased, to entertain a due pride in ourselves — a pride which is important and perhaps necessary to the maintenance of that dignity, with which we, as true soldiers of the Faith, should rally round the banner which is our sacred heirloom. We are not proud of our race ; we who are the world's most ancient nobility ; whose blood is the bluest of all the life streams of the races of the earth ; we whose pedigree dates from those to whom was given the most glorious patent of aristocracy — the most sublime heritage of humanity — the Revelation of God — as understood by Heaven — to be a gift to man for ever- more. There arc, in the rolls of renown which we, though, utterly unworthy of them, are still permitted to retain, KEHEMIAH. 55 some names around which, there shines a halo of so sacred a gloiy that one scarcely ventures to approach them ; still less to deal with them so as to try to draw them from the sublimity of their own age and its solemn surroundings, to the more dense and less pure atmosphere of our commonplace and unsentimental (which means unfeeling) age, To this grave category belong such men as Moses our Master; David our Minstrel; Elijah our mysterious Prophet. But on the other hand, there are other men who, though their associations are connected with the loftiest conditions of humanity, and their careers are hallowed with purposes and occurrences of a sacred character, are yet so comprehensible to our ordinary understandings, and so legible to the reading of our hearts, that we can feel a thorough sympathy with them, and gather a ready lesson from their lives, their works, and their ways. To this class of men belongs the prophet Nehemiah, one of the most remarkable men of his, or of any, age. He was a peculiarly useful man: one of those personages in whose character were intimately combined the fervour of passionate thought and the serenity of practical action. In certain minds, and those are very noble minds, the powers of sentiment are found intermingled with the powers of work. Such men are formed to be leaders. They excite with the voice or the pen, while they incite with the mighty force of example. In them precept and practice find their impulses blended. And when these conditions of being are exerted for a high, a noble, a religious object — for the happiness of hu- manity and the service of the Maker — such men as these are blest with the holiest of blessings — the 56 NEHEMIAH. assurance that one is fulfilling a career which leads straightway from earth to Heaven, and lifts the soul on the wings of a divine influence from a human to an angelic sphere of being. Such a man was Nehemiah. He lived at a critical period of our history : a period at which such a person was wanted for the carrying out of a great object. Let the carping critics of Biblical literature say what they will, and dig out new-fangled theories from their thin soil of learning, no discrepancy that they can discover, or fancy they can discover, in the historical portions of the hagiographa-narrative can affect a fact clear to the unprejudiced investigator, the fact that Nehemiah, his writings, his character, and his recorded thoughts and deeds, fitted in most perfectly with the time in which he lived. That time was a remarkable one. Some knowledge of it has come down to us from history. The Jews, after a long captivity, had been permitted to return to their own land. They had undergone great vicissitudes. The Chaldean or rather Babylonian sovereign Nebu- chadnezzar had destroyed their city and their temple ; he had overthrown their throne, and had endeavoured to crush out their nationality. Of course in this last attempt he could not succeed ; for the fire smouldered in the ashes — that fire which was kindled from a heavenly fount of light ; and which was, and is, and will be, imperishable. Belshazzar, the successor of the Babylonian king, had been conquered by the victorious Mede. The empire of the great and good Cyrus was established on this side of the Caspian sea, and that excellent potentate had ameliorated the condition of his Jewish subjects and had made arrangements for their restoration to their ancient land. Cyrus was a prince 2JEHEMIAK. 57 whous. modern monarchs would do well to imitate. He was wise, temperate and brave ; a model prince in the age in which he lived. We all know how, under the edict of the Medo-Persian king, our ancestors, led by Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, lineal descendant of the anointed David, returned to their beloved land. It W T as this Zerubbabel, called in the Persian history Shesh-Bazzar, who is commemorated in our familiar n^ljn song commencing Tl^l^ ^IIX TI^E. The nation was restored. The first stone of the temple was laid. And here let us pause and listen to the grand record of Scripture. "And all the people shouted with a great shout when they praised the Lord, because the foundation of the house of the Lord was laid. " But many of the Priests and Levites, and the chiefs of the fathers, old men who had seen the first house, wept with a loud voice when the foundation of this new house was laid before their eyes."* We can picture to ourselves, even in this cold un- enthusiastic age, the mingled tears and smiles : how, while the memories of the past bid the old men weep ; the joys of the present, and the hopes of the future shone like summer sunlight, struggling for mastery through the shadows of lost glories and all " The tender grace of a day that is dead."f But though under the gracious permission and with the generous assistance of the noble Persian monarch our fathers were restored to their ancient land where they could "sing the songs of Zion" once more; though in the sacred city and on its holy mount they 8 Ezra hi. 11, 12. f Tennyson. 58 NEHEMIAH. were allowed to rebuild the temple of their worship ; many of the glories of the past had fled, and eould not be restored. The Jews were no longer a powerful, a prosperous, or a dominant people. Their national banner was tarnished, their renown was sullied, their prestige was gone; their commerce, once so splendid, was reduced to a mere second-rate condition. Their spirit was broken by captivity, and, unhappily, the pure descent of some of their ancient families was tainted by intermarriage with inferior races. It was not wonderful then that the restoration was not at first a success. The weakness of the Jews made itself felt. They unwisely and ungraciously refused the proffered assistance of the Samaritan Jews, and. the} 7 were exposed not only to their hatred but to the enmity of neighbouring non- Jewish tribes. Ezra, or as the Apocrypha, Josephus, and the Greeks call him, Esdras, went either with the permission, or, as we are inclined to believe, with a special commission from the Persian Sovereign, and organised the nation. He re-established our religion on its former defined basis, and he even arranged a constitution, evidently of a religious, and possibly even of a political character, which afforded a settlement for the restored people. It would seem, however, that after Ezra's death or retirement, misfortunes ensued. The city of Jerusalem was not defended by walls. It was unprovided with fortifications. The condition of the city of the people and of all that they held dear became pitiable. And as news did not travel fast in those days, some time appears to have elapsed before intelligence of these: misfortunes reached the Jews who remained in Per&ia. In those days a king named Artaxcrxes reigned in NEHEMIAH. ( J Persia, and his swa}* extended from the confines of India to the shores of the Levant. He was, probably, the successor of that Xerxes "who was defeated by the Greeks. But whether he or his ' predecessor was the Ahasuerus of Scripture seems somewhat doubtful. When persons, in books or lectures or elsewhere, pretend to know all about these ancient kings, without giving a single fact as an authority for their statements, one need not believe them. Notwithstanding the researches of such great men as Bollin and Prideaux, there is great doubt as to the identity of the eastern kings ; and historians are even now doubtful as to the monarch mentioned in Scripture History as having conquered the luxurious Belshazzar. Things must have gone very wrong at Jerusalem ; for new"s came to Susa, the Persian capital, of the misfortunes under w r hich the Jews were suffering. There was then residing in Susa a very distinguished Jew named JNehemiah. It would seem that he had been carried away in captivity at a very early age, when Nebuchadnezzar conquered Jerusalem. He had risen somewhat after the fashion of Joseph, to great eminence in the court of the Persian monarch ; for the great oriental satraps, more wise than those modern Christian kings who refused to emancipate the Jews, and preferred to oppress them, thought it wise to avail themselves of the signal talents, sincere patriotism, earnestness and integrity of their Jewish subjects ; and as Joseph rose to distinction in the court of Pharaoh, and Daniel in that of Belshazzar, so Nehemiah obtained a post of high distinction in the court of the Medo- Pcrsian sovereigns. He was called the royal cup- bearer. Such an office was till quite recently even a 60 NEHEMIAH. post of honour in the imperial court of Germany ; an elector of the Empire, himself a sovereign prince in his own dominions, holding a similar office in the palace of the Kaiser. The word used in scripture for the description of Nehemiah's office is the Tirshatha, and this word seems to be usually translated Cupbearer. Others, however, translate it Governor. A great authority is of opinion that the word is of uncertain etymology. It seems probable, however, notwithstanding the occurrence of the letter T\ instead of tD the expression may be derived from "lfcDfcy meaning governor or ruler ; or it may be some Chaldaic compound of *VtD palace and ItO^ governor, the letters T\ and £3 being often interchange- able. Be this, however, as it may, there can be no doubt that Nchemiah filled a position of very great dignity in the court of the Asiatic monarch. But in his case, as in that of his great predecessor Joseph, the old love of nationality, and the old attachment to his country and his faith prevailed ov r er the attractions of his exalted position in the land of exile. When Nehemiah heard of the misfortunes of his brethren ; when the sound of their sufferings reached him ; when he knew that the land of his birth, the land of his race, the land in which his fathers Avere buried, and in which was his childhood's home, was exposed to the tread of an insulting invader, he resolved on abandoning the comforts of his home, the hopes of ambition, the pleasures of his high position, the associations of personal friendship ; and he de- termined on casting his lot with his unhappy, his endangered, his degraded brethren. If we wish to understand what really he did resign, NEHEMIAH. 61 let us imagine for instance, a nobleman of Polish descent such as Count "Wale w ski, who is so recently dead that we can all remember him, resigning the splendour of his position at the then magnificent court of Paris, where he was the intimate of the Emperor, and the cynosure of the courtiers' eyes, in order to blend his fate with that of his unhappy countrymen in subjugated Poland. However, regardless of personal comfort and public ambition, Nehemiah left Susa, the Persian capital, and hurried to Jerusalem. It is true that the favour of his sovereign furnished, it may even be said armed, him with credentials likely to keep in awe those troublesome hordes who, whatever might have been their hatred towards the Jews, would necessarily be deterred from annoying them by fear of the anger of the great monarch who reigned at Susa. Nehemiah arrived at Jerusalem, and almost immedi- ately on his arrival went to inspect the city. Josephus thinks he was accompanied by a number of exiled Jews from Babjdon ; but this is not quite clear ; indeed it is not important. Nehemiah found the Holy City in a very sad condition. The walls were in a state of dilapidation. They had never been rebuilt. He saw the danger of an unwalled city, containing treasures, and situated in a region surrounded by ^hostile tribes. It is not likely that persons would resort thither with a feeling of security, or that the city would be likely to attain a reputation for, or condition of, dignity, so long as it remained unfortified. Nehemiah then at once resolved to rebuild the walls. It was here that the remarkable energy of his character manifested itself. No sooner had he decided, than he at once 63 . NEHEMIAH. determined on action. He hardly lost a moment ; waiting only three days either for necessary rest, or possibly for religious purification after his journey. He neither exaggerated the importance of his undertaking nor the necessity of hurrying it. To use a common English expression, and a very forcible one, Nehemiah at once put his shoulder to the wheel. Hard to work he went, and wisely he made others work too. In reading the Biblical account of the building of the walls, one is reminded of an episode in the early days of the French He volution, when a fortification was thrown up by the combined labours of persons of all classes and all ages, and both sexes. Then noblemen and. priests laboured cheerfully at the earthworks. In like manner, priests, nobles, merchants, and people laboured strenuously at the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem. Of course there were exceptions to the general ardour. The nobles of the Tekoites, Nehemiah tells us with noble simplicity, " put not their necks to the work of their Lord." There are drones in all communities ; and the idleness or pride (often inter- changeable terms) of the Tekoite hidalgos has thus gone down to posterity. The detail of the work and the division of labour are graphically and carefully described by the great writer. One could almost draw a plan of the wall and its gates from the Biblical explanation. Among the many in- teresting facts to be gathered from this description, two may be especially mentioned. First, it is clear that at this period there were manufactures carried on in the holy city, for the goldsmiths are specially alluded to as performing a great portion of the work ; and there were furnaces, the tower — probably the high KEHEMIAH. 63 snaft or chimney — of which was repaired by two of the workers. The expression " tower of the furnaces " would lead one to infer that there were a number of fires, hearths, or furnaces discharging their products of combustion into a common shaft. If so, economy of furnace construction was not unknown to our fore- fathers, who may have been in an advanced condition of industrial progress. And this indeed is likely, when we consider how rapidly the wall was built. Nor was Nehemiah content with merely throwing "ap the masonry of the fortifications. He took care to provide gates and fit them with the necessary furniture, so that the city boundary might be as complete for purpose of peaceable ingress and egress as for purposes ©f defence in case of war. The work went on, but not unmolested. Certain foreigners — we mean men not of Jewish race — sub- jected Nehemiah to constant menace and annoyance, being possibly actuated by jealousy of the Jews, and apprehension of the power that might accrue to them, if their city were in a state of security from the aomadic and plundering tribes that dwelt around Jerusalem and its vicinity. First they laughed at the Jews ; but when they found that Nehemiah, regardless of their mockery, pursued the work, they grew angry, and the energetic Tirshatha found it necessary to divide Ms band into two parties — one to work at the wall, and the other to cover them ; he armed the latter so that they might be ready to protect those who laboured at the fortification in the event of their being attacked by their enemies. Indeed, he took the precaution of arming those that were actually engaged in building, ©r in carrving building materials, or removing debris 64 NEHEMIAH. and rubbish ; each man, builder, and bearer had his weapon ready, and as the necessities of the work kept them apart at intervals on the fortification, Nehemiah arranged that there should be a signal in case of danger — that is to say, when a trumpet was sounded, all were to hurry to the spot whence the sound came, and thus close their ranks. By this excellent plan the risk was avoided of their being cut off in detail in case of a sudden surprise. Imagine the grave responsibilities that pressed on this great man. He, with his brethren and his own immediate followers — his guards and servants — were in constant vigil : " Never," says he in that homely language which seems to us so strikingly forcible, " Never did we put off our clothes, save for our ablu- tions." It may be incidentally mentioned that the name Nehemiah was probably not an uncommon name, as amongst the builders of the Avail a Nehemiah is men- tioned who is evidently not the hero of our paper, but a man who — or whose father — was a satrap of a por- tion of a district called Beth-zur.* Then, while the wall was being partially built, Nehemiah met with a new annoyance. The Jews dis- puted among themselves, and evidently endeavoured to profit by the misfortunes of those who had neces- sarily raised money on their lands and houses in order to pay the taxes levied by the Persian King. No doubt the Monarch and his governors were as exacting in the matter of tribute as are the Pashas of our time in the East. To raise the necessary tribute some of the Jews had mortgaged their landed property; but '"' The present Bassorak is the H"!^'? of Scripture. SEHEMIAH. 65 Neheniiah, wlio seems to have had marvellous powers of persuasion, managed to set this matter right. He induced the mortgagees to promise to restore the pro- perty, and — with his usual shrewd foresight — called the priests and caused the mortgagees to seal their promises by a solemn vow; for possibly they might have repented at leisure of what they had promised in haste, under the captivating influences of Nehemiah's persuasion or the fear of his indignation. It is satis- factory to learn that the promises thus made and ratified were faithfully kept. JNTeheniiah, as we think we have before mentioned, had been appointed Governor by Artaxerxes, the Persian monarch. He shewed the greatest generosity and self-denial in the exercise of his high office, and evidently presented a great contrast to the former governors. He, unlike them, exacted no tax or tribute from the people. Instead of taking from them he gave to them. He maintained a sumptuous table, at which he not only received and feasted 150 Jews, but even heathen guests. He refused to take tribute from the people, because the bondage was heavy on them. And when he tells us this, he breaks off his narrative, and, with singular pathos, that strikes home to the heart, he exclaims, — " Think of me, my God, for good, according to all that I have done for this people ! " Sanballat was the name of the chief instigator of the opposition to Nehemiah's plans. He attacked Nehemiah with bitter words, alleging that ho had treasonable motives in fortifying Jerusalem. He calumniated him by declaring that his object was to rebel against the Persian Kin£ and to make himself Kino; in Jerusalem. 66 NEHEMIAH. This was a perilous scandal, but Sanballat did not venture, it would seem, to publish this foul accusation at Susa. He endeavoured to intimidate JNTehemiah, whose friends took f riff lit and urffed him to take shelter in the Temple, which was strongly fortified ; for they evidently apprehended a resort to physical force on the part of Nehcmiah's enemies. But ISTehemiah was too courageous, too strong in his moral convictions of right, to fear the cowardly calumniator. He dauntlessly refused to exhibit the least fear of Sanballat, and — to use a homely phrase — " would not show the white feather." Like Nelson, when his work was done, he gave all the glory to God. We have neither time nor space to describe step by step the history told in the Book of jNehemiah. In some respects it is a repetition of certain chapters of Ezra — the fact probably being that the chapters were at some time added to the earlier book; and we believe that the Book of Nehemiah has been called in certain canons the second book of Ezra. We have been mainly desirous to urge those points of the story that bear most forcibly on the characteristics of the great Jew, and indicate the sterling beauties of his noble dis- position. One of his first acts of rule, after he found himself released from the labour of building the wall, was to take a census of the people, and to ascertain and register their genealogies. The census even extended to the cattle. And now the worship of old was restored. The Scroll of the Law — the divine heirloom of our race, again appeared before the eyes of the congregation. NEHEMIAH. 57 No doubt the people wept when they heard it. The feast of Tabernacles was kept with due observance for the first time since the days of Joshua. Nehemiah organized various matters of high im- portance, and returned for a brief time to the king's court. For he had evidently a divided duty. But his heart seems to have yearned for his own people ; for he again obtained the king's permission to set out for Jerusalem, and went thither. He found that a part of his work had been undone in his absence, and there- fore he had to make various administrative arrange- ments. He found, moreover, to his great disgust, that the Sabbath-day was violated in the most shameless manner. Field work and trading were carried on, but he zealously put an immediate stop to this iniquitous practice. He was no middle-course man. His was the policy of " thorough " — the only policy that succeeds in this world : and he put down Sabbath-breaking with a strong hand. He closed the gates of the city during the Sabbath, and had them guarded so that no mer- chandize or produce should be brought in from the commencement till the conclusion of the Sabbath. Finding that some traders had established themselves just outside the wall in the hope of carrying on business unobserved or unmolested on the day of rest, he pounced on them too, and vowed he would visit them with condign punishment if he caught them a second time at their nefarious practices. They took care not to repeat them, however. And the next abuse he stopped was the sin of mixed marriages. He forbade intermarriage of the Jews with any of the women of other nations, a practice that had apparently grown up 68 NEHEMIAH. in Jerusalem, but which he loudly denounced ; and he purified the priesthood by ejecting from the sacerdotal office a man who had married a daughter of San- ballat. And this is all he tells us of his work. And he ends his narrative with these plaintive words, " Remember me for good, oh God ! " Yes : these not unfrequent interjaculatory suppli- cations of his convince us, that though it is himself who has drawn the narrative of his works and thoughts, whence we infer the beauty of his character ; yet that narrative is true, and not overmuch coloured or too highly wrought. It seems that he lays the story of his life and deeds, and his thoughts and hopes, not be- fore man, but before God. It is not man whom he seeks to please. It is the Heavenly Father whom he tries to conciliate in tremulous apprehension, scarcely with the confidence one might anticipate. Yes, the Book of Nehemiah seems to us to have been written by the sacred author not to convince man of the goodness and greatness of his labours, but to plead his own cause at the Throne of the Almighty. Nehemiah was, indeed, a great and good man. His character seems to be unfolded before us by the story of his life. His indomitable energy and his firm and " thorough " policy cannot fail to strike us with ad- miration. His love for his people and for the Holy City was so strong that he sacrificed, on more occasions than one, the ease, comfort and luxury of a high posi- tion in the court, and about the person of the proudest monarch of the age. He sacrificed royal favour, courtly splendour, luxurious ease — for what ? To re-build the walls, to re-establish the glory of the Sacred City, the NEHEMIAH. 69 home of his fathers and his Faith. He breasted the wicked jealousies and false machinations of treacherous enemies, to risk his life for Jerusalem and his brethren. He grappled with the thousand difficulties incidental to the re-modelling of a small community, exposed to external and internecine jealousies. We learn a great lesson from his life — a lesson not easily to be forgotten. Around himself, around his noble character, clusters the main interest of his book. The introduction of his narrative into the Canon of Scripture affords more advantage than is derivable from its historic passages, from the additions it offers to the annals of our ancient days. It serves another purpose. It is a lesson taught by a life of action. The book contains no precept of morality, no revelation of doc- trine, no narration of miracles. It is the story of a life, the story of a hero ; the story of a man of ordinary condition of life, which apart from the incidental sur- roundings of the age in which he lived, and the circumstances which signalised that age, was a condi- tion of life of an almost common-place character. He acted in the round of his life as many of us could act if we would. But what was most remarkable about him was this. He made his duties for himself. He grooved a channel of action for himself. He set himself work to do, and he did it manfully. Oh ! you who live idle lives, and declare that your position unfortunately obliges you to no duty — ridiculous assertion ! — learn a lesson from this man, who finding- there was work to be done, wrong to redress, good to accomplish, went out of his easy way of life to effect w r hat had to be effected. You who complain of life's hardships, learn your lesson from this hero, who 70 NEHEMIAH. breasted his hardships and trials with a stout heart, and never was cast down. And through all his exer- tions, all his trials, all his troubles, all his struggles ; he had but one thought — "Remember me, oh God!" The walls that he built with so much care and energy exist no longer. The ramparts which he raised have been beaten down. The work which he laboured at so painfully with hand, and heart, and brain, is all undone. The enemy besieged the city and crushed the fruit of his life's labour. Is this quite true? No. The work of his life, the fruit of his life is not destroyed, and never can be. The effect of a virtuous and manly life is immortal. No enemy can break down that fortification. It lives on; it lives for ever. The character of Nehemiah may be written in a few words. It was a combination of manliness and holiness. Like him, may we learn to be manly and holy ; to find out the work to be done and to do it, despite obstacle and evil report, and enmity and trial ; relying only on Heaven. Like him, let us be self-sacrificing, and earnest; and above all things, let us sanctify the labour of our hands, the thought of our minds, nay, the very passion of our hearts. Then we may confidently hope that " God will remember us for good ! " MOSES MENDELSSOHN. " The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom." — Ps. cxi. 10. Many and varied are the modes by which Heaven in- structs mankind in the great lessons of life. We may, indeed, suppose that the Bible, which is replete with precept, doctrine, narrative, and example, and which appeals with equal force to the understanding, the imagination, and the heart, is, in itself, all-sufficient for the moral education of humanity. Yet the Divine scheme, which is always lavish in its bounties, does not content itself with granting to man the means of instruction which Scripture affords, but graciously offers other beacons for his guidance. Brilliant as are the lights which the revelations of Scripture shed on the world, the Holy Hand has mercifully kindled other lamps, to indicate and to illuminate the road, which leads through the circum- stances and conditions of life, to that earthly happi- ness which consists of hope and endeavour, and beyond it, to that heavenly happiness in which hope is fulfilled and endeavour triumphant. The world teems with these lessons, and glows with these lights. There are indeed, "tongues in trees, sermons in stones, books in the running brooks, and good in everything." And, among the many methods by which men learn 72 MOSES MENDELSSOHN. to be good and happy, there are, excepting religion, no aids so forcible and no systems of guidance so effective as those involved in the examples and the memorials of great and good men. The story of their lives strikes home to us all. For, in all lives, however distinct and different in circumstance and aspect, there is, at least, some one condition of similarity, some one element of affinity, some one connecting link. There is a kinship in humanity. We may never know how great or how small a thing may have kept the worst of us from being virtuous, or may have saved the best of us from doing wrong. But if, when we read the records of some great and good life, we are touched by its example and awakened to its merit and honour, do we not all feel that we have within us the capability, which, had we trained it wisely, directed it duly, or seen it in time, might have made us as great or as good as he whom we admire, or brought us to the per- formance of actions as heroic, or to the leading of a life as true, as his ? Do not " Lives of great men all remind us, We may make our lives sublime ! " For even though it may not be within the competency of all of us to imitate every or any great action, we may all of us, in some respect, imitate every or any good life. It was said by a man of genius, who not long since rose from a comparatively humble origin to an eminent position, " The question is not so much what you do, as what manner of man you are." Indeed, the matter at issue with all of us really is the manner of our man- hood. The character of a career is not involved in an MOSES MENDELSSOHN. 73 individual action, or in isolated actions, but in the sum of one's actions, in their combined and blended effect ; or, rather, in the influence which dominates, directs, and actuates them. The loveliness and power of light do not reside in the separate elementary colours into which the prism resolves it, but in their combined effect when fused into one glittering ray ; or, better still, in the influence which, when these hues — some bright, some gloomy — are intimately blended, merges the individuality and effect of each, and strikes out from their union a new, a strong, a brilliant and har- monious, an almost immortal beauty. The pencil of light is an emblem of what a true life should be. When analysed the every phase of one should present — like every tint of the other — a certain if not a perfect charm ; and its darker shadows be- coming cleared, and its brighter glows subdued in the harmony of union, its ultimate effect should be a beauty and a glory and a blessing. Of the many careers which serve to " Point a moral or adorn a tale," there are some which are useful only as warnings, while others are useful as examples. It is of these latter that we would speak. To find such lives as these we need not travel out of the records of our own race. It is, unhappily, not the practice of our people, even on occasions, to exalt or quote the heroes of our own history, or to assert their merits or eulogise their fame. We cite instances of ancient greatness from the pages of Plutarch and Nepos, and yet Greece, Rome, and Carthage never produced more illustrious examples than did the Palestine of our ancestors. And 74 MOSES MENDELSSOHN. no modern career in the whole range on which a Carlyle descants, or from which a 8miles draws his didactic inferences, shines with a brighter, a steadier, or a purer light, than does that of our Jewish sage and philosopher, Moses Mendelssohn. It is not so long since he was taken from us but that we can call him a man of our own times, and appreciate him better from our capability of understanding the condition of society in which he lived ; for its features do not differ widely from those of our own contemporary social system. His station and external fashion of life were not far removed from — perhaps the same as — those of our readers. Indeed, such differences as there are between the age and conditions in which he lived and those in which we live, are just such as rendered the accomplishment of his greatness more difficult to himself, and as render the possibility of imitating it more easy to ourselves. Moses Mendelssohn was born at Dessau (in Germany) in 1729 ; his father was a schoolmaster and scribe or Sop/ier, (copyist of the rnin 13D), and was so very poor that the young Mendelssohn determined on leaving home at fourteen to seek his fortune and relieve his father from the burden of supporting him. He arrived at Berlin without the means of purchasing food, but by the intercession of a Rabbi Frankcl, who had taught him at Dessau, he obtained shelter in a garret and an occasional meal. It will not detract from the benevolence of this act, if we mention that it was at that time customary for the wealthy — and, indeed, for those whose means scarcely raised them above poverty — to contribute weekly allowances, called icocliengcld, to students, to MOSES MENDELSSOHX. 75 supply them with the means of maintenance, in order to enable them to pursue their studies. The contributors paid these sums in turn. The custom still prevails in Poland, and among the more ancient congregations of Germany. In those old-fashioned days, intellect was not only honoured, but supported also. Mendelssohn now applied himself sedulously to the attainment of knowledge ; and his thirst for wisdom, as well as his aptitude for acquiring it — or, perhaps we should say, his energy and diligence in acquiring it, were marvellous. At Dessau he had at first received the meagre in- struction commonly imparted to Jewish boys at that time ; he had learned to repeat by rote a number of rabbinical texts, the meanings of which were beyond a child's comprehension ; but his gigantic mind, even while yet held in his boyish frame, greedily sought other and higher food. He determined on studying Hebrew grammatically, though in his day boys of his class did not thus learn it. He was aided in his efforts by Rabbi Frankel. At Berlin, he became acquainted with an eminent Pole named Israel Moses, and with a young medical man named Kisch, and from these he obtained an immense amount of knowledge. His ac- quaintance with these friends was due to one of his numerous acts of charity. The difficulties which he had to surmount to obtain knowledge were as great as the stores of knowledge which he at length acquired. Notwithstanding the defects of early education and the drawbacks of class, clique, and poverty, he gained a profound acquaintance with Hebrew and German, a knowledge of other languages, of natural philosophy, general literature, and mathematics. He wrote twenty- 70 MOSES MENDELSSOHN. one works, full of erudition and literary beauty ; works which are models of style, no less than treasures of wisdom. For, though he was born of a class whose vernacular was a corrupt mixture of distorted German and Hebrew, he acquired so pure and elegant a style in the German language, that his writings are cited as having effected an improvement in the language, and as having, so to speak, formed a great step of progress in the literature of his native land. While he was lodging with his friend at Berlin, a Jewish manufacturer, named Bernard, having heard of his peculiar abilities and attainments, appointed him tutor to his children, and afterwards clerk in his manu- factory. Mendelssohn's mind, though capable of soaring to the noblest heights of literature and science, was not incapable of descending to the material details of a business career. From the position of clerk in Bernard's house, he rose to be manager, and eventually partner. He married in 1762 and enjoyed great domestic happiness. He fell a victim to the intensity of study, mental labour, and meditation, and died in 1787 at the comparatively early age of fifty-seven. Having given this cold sketch of his life, let us enquire a little into the " manner of his manhood." The " accidents of birth " were, in a social point of view, wholly against him. He was born of a race despised and maligned in the age and country in which he flourished, yet he lived till that age and that country were proud of him, and glad of him. He was, as we have said, the son of poor parents, but he "broke his birth's invidious bar," and attained honourably-earned wealth, and a respectable worldly position. He was but feebly educated in his childhood ; but by arduous, dili- MOSES MENDELSSOHN. 77 gent, sustained, strenuous, nay, extraordinary exertions, he acquired marvellous knowledge, and became a very monument of learning, a model of literary taste, a bold pioneer of new paths of wisdom. He had none of those personal advantages, which even among men, exert a certain fascination, command a hearing, dignify presence, or produce effect ; yet to use the words of his biographer, " he won every heart at first sight." He had not even the advantage of strong health, yet he laboured far more energetically and thoroughly than the stalwart and robust. Immense and varied as were his acquirements, he was not in the position of life in which he could devote himself wholly to literature or study, for he supported his family mainly by mercantile pursuits ; yet he was a great and an industrious writer, and he has left to pos- terity treasures of authorship, which perhaps a genera- tion less material than our own will appreciate as they deserve. In his day, every obstruction was offered to the advance and improvement of the race to which he belonged, and it held no recognised place in society ; yet he lived down obstacle and impediment, and he became the central star of an admiring group of dis- ciples, friends, and adherents. Though the wisest of his day sought his companionship and his friendship ; though trusting pupils and delighted auditors sur- rounded him ; and contemporary fame sounded his renown throughout Germany, and, indeed, throughout Europe, he never, never forgot the beauty of humility, and was as modest when he had reached the pinnacle of his fame as while he was engaged in attaining it. He moved at first in an unenlightened and a pre- 78 MOSES MENDELSSOHN. judiced society, and was virulently opposed even by his co-religionists ; but lie was neither discouraged nor disgusted, as a man of feebler mind, or even ordinary temper, would have been ; he only waited and perse- vered. He had learnt " to labour — and to wait." And thus readily seeing evils, of which men of inferior capacities had no glimpse, he did not dash into wild projects of reform, but he strove to pierce prejudice and habit with the light of truth — not with the sword of violence — and he triumphed over hostility as much by his meekness as by his merit. But, above all things — and this was his greatest glory — his life was, in its morality and its piety, a striking and a shining illustration of the beauty and strength of Judaism. For high above his position, his philosophy, his attainments, his intellectual fame, his wordly condition, he placed the Judaism in which he gloried. It was the master-key to the music of his life. He was a Jew above all things and through all things. His religion was to him not only the sun that shone high in the sky, over the earth beneath, but the sunshine that permeated everything on the face and in the depths of Nature. He discovered that he could be a good citizen, and yet a Jew ; a great literate, a companion of sages and philosophers of other creeds, and yet a Jew ; a striving, and eventually a prosperous, merchant — and yet a professing, a practising, and a persistent Jew. There was no way of his life in which he failed to shine. Though he spiritualized his existence by inten- sity of meditation, and lifted his soul continually to MOSES MENDELSSOHN. 79 the contemplation of the objects which float in the regions of thought, he did not soar above worldly ties and duties, nor in any wise break from the home feelings, without which no life, however finely cast, can be completely beautiful. He was an excellent father; he was no ascetic, but enjoyed the charms of society ; he was a hearty friend ; and, when his frame was decaying, and the hand of death near him, he sacrificed his love of tranquillity and his natural need of repose to the duty of defending a deceased friend. Though warmly attached to his religion, he was no fanatic, but supported controversy with amiability, and endured difference of opinion with toleration. He followed the maxim of the Psalmist, he " sought peace and pursued it." Study and knowledge sealed in his heart the great truths of religion. His was the faith which is clothed in wisdom ; his the wisdom which is hallowed by faith. His faith was to him, as it should be to all of us, an armed angel. For faith, however firm her tread, is too ethereal to walk on earth, unless shielded by the armour of knowledge from the weapons of earthly learning. His faith presented to the world a breastplate of wisdom, against which the Mows of sophistry and casuistry rang in vain ; and yet, had it been otherwise, had artifice pierced the joints and shattered the almost invulnerable mail, his faith would have spread her angel pinions, and soared high above earth, and far beyond defeat ! We do not propose to enter here into the details of his life, but will content ourselves with quoting three instances to exemplify what "manner of man" he was. 80 MOSES MENDELSSOHN. "While yet a boy, and very poor, he was so reluctant to become a burden to others, that he would purchase a loaf of bread, and notch it in such a manner, as to apportion it into a certain number of meals correspond- ing with the state of his means. Though a profound, assiduous, and successful student of the highest branches of learning, he sedulously cul- tivated and acquired an elegant handwriting; because he deemed that it would help him to maintain a family respectably. And, indeed, it was partly owing to this accomplishment, that he obtained so much worldly success. He lost his eldest child, a babe of eleven months old. Every heart to which young children are dear can conceive the heaviness of such a blow to his tender spirit. He felt it — but he did not repine or despair. No ; he thanked heaven for having granted his lost little one a happy life, while she was yet on earth. Indeed, his affectionate heart not only throbbed with love for his own kindred, but was alive to sympathy with those who needed it; he was benevolent and singularly gentle. But these gentle spirits are often those that strive most strongly and work most bravely. He taught the world that the Jew, hitherto despised, must be despised no more : he conquered a place in society, in the highest society — the intellectual circle — for the people of his faith. And this victory he won, not by dint of clamour, or falsehood, or obtrusive self-assertion, but by the force of his own intellectual powers, his unsullied integrity, his admirable character. His great contemporary, Lessing, having learnt from MOSES MENDELSSOHN. 81 his experience of Mendelssohn, the true beauty of the character of a good Jew, stamped that experience on the face of contemporary literature, and strove to teach it to the million, by means of his famous and popular drama, " Nathan der Weise ; " and it is said that under the disguise of the hero of the piece, he paid a tribute to his friend — and to truth, by painting the character of Mendelssohn. When, at length, Mendelssohn fell ill, broken beneath the weight of thought and labour — which while they uplift the mind bear down the body — he was bidden to desist from all mental occupation. Those to whom such work is life's main interest, vocation, and enjoy- ment, can conceive the penalty involved in such an abstinence. He knew that his life was a gift and a trust of precious value, which it was a duty to preserve. He made every needful sacrifice ; quailed before no effort, but met disease just as a brave man meets an enemy, grappled with it, and, with the blessing of Heaven, threw his foe. Threw him for a time only ; for at length the day came when no courage, no care, no effort, could avert the blow which was to take him from the world of living men. He died, as he had lived, calmly, serenely. It is said that while Addison was expiring, he called his pupil to his bedside, in order that he " might see," said the sinking philosopher, "how a Christian can die." But Mendelssohn gave mankind a more useful lesson, a more touching example, a more glorious spectacle ; he showed — without ostentatiously proclaim- ing it — how a Jew should live ! The career of Mendelssohn may in certain respects be summed up in a few words — the few words inscribed G 82 MOSES MENDELSSOHN. on his bust in the Berlin Jews' Free School, and written by Karl Wilhelm Ramler, — one of the poets by whom truth is none the less substantially told be- cause clothed in spiritual language : "Weise wie Sokrates, Treu dem Glauben seiner Vater, Wie er, die Unsterblichkeit lehrend, Und sich unsterblich machend wie er." " As wise as Socrates, True to the faith of his fathers, Like him, he taught immortality, And, like him, rendered himself immortal." At this day, when we hear around us complacent ignorance questioning the solemn truths of ages, it is some satisfaction to learn from the history of this great man that, after he had spent a life-time in thought and study, the glow of faith which had lighted the birth of his labours shone on their summit with undiminished sheen. And it is refreshing to turn from the troubled stories of kings, warriors, and statesmen, to the record of this calm, pure life, in which, as in the religion he followed, peace, love, and wisdom are harmoniously combined. The wisest of men, favoured with natural genius, rich in acquired knowledge, admit that at the acme of their renown, or at the end of their work, they have, after all, only attained the beginning of wisdom. Even Mendelssohn, profound as was his learning, great and varied as were his acquirements, fruitful as were his meditations, doubtlessly never arrived beyond the beginning of wisdom. But he had arrived at the beginning of wisdom in another and a better sense, MOSES MENDELSSOHN. 83 for, on that beginning, he built the beauty Of his life. His knowledge was the altar on which he stood to worship his God. For his history confirms the truth, which the Psalmist whose music he loved^ taught mankind, ages ago — 'n my naan rv#an — : • t : t • " The be2rmnm