THE LIBRARY 
 OF 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 LOS ANGELES
 
 y 
 
 > N HtUDI MENTALS; 
 
 
 BEING 
 
 R§]IT^ 
 
 ON 
 
 The Principles of Government — The Government of 
 
 England — The East India Company — The Court of 
 
 Directors — The Board of Control — The System of 
 
 Government in India ; and on Jurisprudence or 
 
 the Principles of Administrative Justice-. 
 
 ADDRESSED TO THE NATIVES 
 
 OF 
 
 INDIA. 
 
 BY 
 
 GEORGE ^NORTON, Esq. 
 
 c 
 
 
 £JL : , . J SEffiA3BSl£s,So 
 
 $t 
 
 M ADR A S : 
 J. B. I'll A 110 AIL 
 
 184 1.
 
 AJlia.vJiu:* PUESS—J. hall, fhixteh,
 
 Z 
 
 VI 
 
 P> ■ 
 
 TO 
 
 THE PEOPLE OF INDIA 
 
 THIS WORK 
 
 IS DEDICATED AND PRESENTED 
 
 BY 
 
 GEORGE NORTON, 
 
 1351861
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 ♦ 
 
 Pages 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS 1 
 
 Discourse I. — On the Principles of Government. 
 
 SECTION L— Of the quality and usefulness of the Science of 
 
 Political Government 25 
 
 II. — Of the Origin of Political Government 27 
 
 III.— Of the Objects of Political Government 29 
 
 IV. — Of the necessity of a settled Plan of Power— or 
 
 a Constitution 32^ 
 
 V.— Of the Marks and Characteristics of a well-con- 
 stituted Government. First ; attention due to 
 the habits, feelings, and manners of the People 37 
 VI. — The same subject continued. Second ; Changes 
 
 should not be sudden 40 
 
 VIL— The same subject continued. Third ; the Exter- 
 nal and Natural condition of a countrj', and 
 
 of its Inhabitants, to be observed 43 
 
 VIII. — The same subject continued. Fourth ; of the 
 Share which the People should have in the 
 
 Administration of the Government 46 
 
 IX. — The same subject continued. Fourth ; of the 
 Share of the People in the government exer- 
 cised by a System of Representation 52 
 
 X. — Reflections on the Marks and Characteristics of 
 good government which have been discussed ; 
 
 and on the Political condition of India GO 
 
 XI. — Of the evils of Arbitrary Government (j 1 
 
 Discourse II.— On the Government of England. 
 
 SECTION L— Of the Nature and Origin of the English Con- 
 stitution | yj 
 
 . ■ II. — Of the Supreme or Legislative authority of the 
 
 English Government. 75
 
 U CONTENTS. 
 
 Pages 
 
 SECTION III.— Of the Queen in her Legislative capacity 77 
 
 IV.— Of the House ofLords 82 
 
 V. — Of the House of Commons 88 
 
 VI.— Of the mode of enacting Laws, or Statutes 100 
 
 VII.— Of the Executive Branch of the English Go- 
 vernment..... 106 
 
 Discourse III. — Of the East India Company. 
 
 SECTION I.— Introductory Observations 119 
 
 II.— Of the meaning of the term Company; and of 
 the Nature and Objects of such an Associa- 
 tion :. 123 
 
 III.— Of the Origin and Formation of the East India 
 
 Company 123 
 
 IV.— Of the Progress of the East India Company, 
 
 until they became a Political Power 133 
 
 V.— Survey of the Political Progress and Condition 
 of the Native States of India, previous to the 
 
 Conquests of the East India Company 140 
 
 VI. — Of the Progressive Conquests of European Na- 
 tions in India, and the effects 148 
 
 VII. — Of the Means and Resources of the East India 
 
 Company for the conquest of India 152 
 
 VIII. — Of the Component Members of the East India 
 
 Company — the Proprietors of Stock 16} 
 
 Discourse IV.— Of the Court of Directors, and Board of Control. 
 
 SECTION I.— Of the Qualifications of Individual Directors.... 1G9 
 II.— Of the course by which the Directors act, as 
 
 a Court , 174 
 
 HI. — Of the Powers of the Court of Directors. 179 
 
 IV.— Of the Board of Control 192 
 
 DiscocnsE V. — Of the Government in India. 
 
 SECTION I,— Preliminary Observations on the subject of this 
 
 Discourse 199 
 
 II. — History of the formation and course of the* Eng- 
 lish Government in India, previous to the fiis-t . 
 regulating Act of 1773 204
 
 CONTENTS. Ill 
 
 Pages 
 SECTION III.— Of the Progress of the Eng.iSh Governments of 
 India, from the year 1773 until the passing of 
 
 the last Charter Act of 1833 21 
 
 IV. — Of the manner in which the Governments of In- 
 dia are constituted, and of what members 
 
 these Governments are composed.. 220 
 
 V. — Of the course and method by which the Govern- 
 ments of India exercise their Functions 226 
 
 VI,_ Of the Powers exercised by the Governments of 
 India: and, first, of the Superintending and 
 Controlling powers of the SupremeGovernment 231 
 VII.— The same subject continued : History and na- 
 ture of the Legislative powers of the Supreme 
 
 Government . ••• 236 
 
 VIII.— The same subject continued : of other peculiar 
 
 powers of the Supreme Government 247 
 
 IX.— The same subject continued: of the Powers ex- 
 ercised by the Subordinate Governments 249 
 
 X. — Reflections on the quality of the system of Go- 
 vernment in India; and notices of some de- 
 fects , 256 
 
 Discourse VI. — On Jurisprudence : or the principles of Administrative 
 
 Justice. 
 
 SECTION I.— Of the quality of Justice as a Virtue, and of the 
 quality of the Science of Administrative Jus- 
 tice 271 
 
 II.— Of the nature and object of human laws for the 
 
 Administration of Justice 276 
 
 III.— Of the origin and nature of Property 279 
 
 IV. — Of the transfer of and succession to Property... 282 
 
 V. — Of the security of the Person 2S 
 
 VI — That the laws on which Administrative Justice is 
 
 founded should be certain and clear 285 
 
 VII. — In what manner Laws should specify and define 
 
 righta 290 
 
 VIII. — Of the Civil Code — for the restoration of Rights, 
 
 and the redress of Injuries , 292
 
 IV C O N T K K T S. 
 
 < 
 
 Pages 
 SECTION IX.— Of the Criminal Code for the punishment of 
 
 Injuries 295 
 
 X. — That revenge is not a just principle or object of 
 
 laws against Crime 298 
 
 XI. — The legitimate object of human Punishment .... 302 
 XII. — Of the Code of Judicial Procedure, and its 
 
 nature and objects 30G 
 
 XIII. —Of the evils arising from a defective method of 
 
 Judicial Procedure 312 
 
 XIV. — That the laws of a country ought to depend on 
 certain general principles, and be arranged ac- 
 cording to some system — the knowledge ©f 
 
 which forms a Science 316 
 
 XV. — Of the quality of the English system of Law 320 
 
 XVI. — Of the causes of Litigation, independently of 
 
 tlie quality of Laws 325 
 
 XVII. — Of the expediency of reducing the laws of a 
 
 country to a systematic Code 327
 
 ADVERTISEMENT 
 
 I 
 
 T has appeared requisite to offer to the English reader 
 some explanation of the nature and object of the present 
 work. 
 
 The substance of the ensuing Discourses formed part of 
 a series of Lectures delivered in years 1833 and 1834, in 
 the College Hall of Madras, to an audience chiefly compos- 
 ed of Natives in a respectable class of life. 
 
 These Lectures weve delivered from Notes ; and, with 
 the exception of the Preliminary address, were couched in 
 the most familiar style, both in language and manner. 
 Every effort was resorted to for the purpose of keepin g 
 alive the attention of a Native audience, and facilitating 
 their comprehension — as, by local and personal illustration, 
 and even occasionally by colloquial discussion. 
 
 In reducing the multifarious materials of these Lectures 
 into a connected work, of course such a character of com- 
 position could not be adopted. Nevertheless, to warrant 
 any reasonable hope of attracting the perusal, or fixing the 
 attention, of a Native reader, a peculiar style and a pecu- 
 liar treatment of the subjects had to be attempted. The 
 Author who would write well or agreeably to an English 
 reader, upon the topics treated of in this work, must write as 
 addressing those who already know much, and have thought 
 much. He who seeks to impart information of this nature 
 efficiently, even to the most enlightened portion of the Na- 
 tive Public who understand English, must address himself
 
 Jj ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 to those who know little, and have thought less upon these 
 subjects. He has td recollect that, not only are many of 
 the expressions he is constrained to use new to the Native 
 reader, as well as peculiarly comprehensive and abstract—* 
 but that his ideas, and his sentiments, and his narrative 
 statements are also new to him. They are often alien alto- 
 gether to such a reader's preconceptions, and even to his 
 personal feelings. It is seldom that allusion is permissible 
 — explanation is necessary at every step. Literary graces 
 must be freely sacrificed— literary faults must sometimes 
 be leaned to. 
 
 These considerations have constantly operated on the 
 Author's mind ; and, indeed, have occasioned his main 
 difficulties in composition. His chief study has been to 
 write suitably to Native comprehension — he has at the same 
 time felt a desire to elevate their thoughts and feelings. 
 He has likewise kept in view the contingency of some at- 
 tempt at an exposition of the subject-matter of these trea- 
 tises through the medium of the Native languages. Actu- 
 ated by th<'se impressions he has from time to time commu- 
 nicated portions of his manuscript to intelligent Natives, 
 and has been in some degree guided and encouraged by 
 their approbation. 
 
 The Author has thought it due to himself to offer these 
 explanations to the English reader upon the style and 
 quality of the ensuing treatises. He is prepared to be 
 criticised by such without favour, but he is unwilling to be 
 judged without fairness. 
 
 It may be surmised, perhaps, in reference to the above 
 observations, that this publication is at least premature — 
 that it neither deserves, nor is calculated, to be popular ; 
 and therefore it is not likely to be useful. This is so novel 
 an undertaking that the Author indulges no speculation as
 
 ADVERTISEMENT. Jjj 
 
 to its popularity with any classes of the Native public. 
 But he is nevertheless buoyed up by the J hope of its becom- 
 ing useful, even though it may never become popular. Since 
 the time when the Lectures above alluded to were delivered, 
 a very extraordinary change has become notorious in the 
 sentiments of Native Society throughout India. An at- 
 tachment to the British rule has gradually extended, and 
 an admiration of its institutions. A spirit of social inter* 
 course has begun to prevail, and a desire of amalgamation 
 as fellow-subjects of one Empire. But, above all, a convic- 
 tion of the advantages of English education, and an earnest 
 desire to promote it, and thereby to gain the only true quali- 
 fications for office and station, in the state and in society, 
 has spread widely among the superior classes of the Native 
 population. This change of feeling can no longer be disput- 
 ed nor despised. Seventy thousand Natives of respectabili- 
 ty entreating by one single petition the patronage of Go- 
 vernment to the cause of education is a sufficient proof at 
 least that such a spirit is awakened. If, indeed, the dif- 
 fusion of knowledge and the increase of scholastic instituti- 
 ons has hardly kept pace with the wants and wishes of the 
 people, yet the care of the Indian Governments and the be- 
 nevolence of societies and of individuls have provided a 
 whole rising generation of Native students in English litera- 
 ture. A Native public so directing their attention to these 
 noble and national objects ; and arising generation so vers- 
 ed in the more useful departments of English learning, can 
 hardly devote their inquiries to topics of more true interest 
 to themselves and to their country, than such as are treated 
 of in the ensuing pages. 
 
 If there existed any English works which compendiously 
 and suitably expounded the principles of Government and 
 of law, and the fundamental constitution of the English and 
 Indian Governments, to which enlightened Natives might
 
 ADVERTISEMENT. 
 IV 
 
 resort with an assurance of easy and adequate information, 
 the following work would perhaps neither merit nor receive 
 any notice. But, if it would be vain to point to English lite- 
 rature for such purposes, the attempt in some degree to sup- 
 ply such a deficiency is not a misguided one. It may serve 
 to direct Native thought into new and productive channels- 
 it may serve thereby to strengthen the union of the Native 
 people under the British rule. It may at least prepare the 
 way for the more successful labours of those who may bring 
 that interrupted leisure, and apply that continuous thought, 
 to their task, which, however necessary, the avocations of the 
 author of these Essays would not permit. 
 
 It may be objected to the following Discourses that, as 
 they contain little that has not been better written before by 
 accredited authors, it would have been fair, and useful to 
 the studiou.s inquirer, to have quoted copiously and distinct- 
 ly the authority from which most of the positions appear to 
 be taken. But the truth is that not much has been borrow- 
 ed from preceding authors. What is not new has been at 
 least newly treated of; and very little consultation has been 
 given to the great writers on politics, moral philosophy, and 
 jurisprudence, until after the task of composition was 
 closed. The work has, indeed, been corrected, and some- 
 times adorned, on subsequent references to such authorities 
 —and the learned reader (if any should be at the pains to 
 take up this Volume) will be reminded, occasionally as he 
 proceeds, of Bacon, of Locke, of Montesquieu, of Hume, of 
 Mill, of Aristotle, and of others. But he will see, at the 
 same time, that there is not room for frequent reference 
 to such authorities, in consequence of the manner in which 
 their common subjects have been worked up in these treatis- 
 es. Some positions, it is believed, are altogether new— as, 
 for instance, what have been advanced as the true distin- 
 guishing principles of the Civil and Criminal Codes. The 
 most frequent resemblance may perhaps be found between
 
 ADVERTISEMENT. ^ 
 
 some portions of (his work and some portions of Bodin's* 
 Republic, and of Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy — and 
 yet not a line of either of those treatises was ever read by 
 the Author till after these Discourses had been written, nor 
 has a line been since altered in consequence of such perusal. 
 He was, however, forcibly struck with the following obser- 
 vation in the preface of the latter writer ; which observa- 
 tion he adopts for himself: ff My method of writing has 
 <c been, to extract what 1 could from my own stores and my 
 " own reflections in the first place, to put down that, and 
 " afterwards to consult upon each subject such readings aa 
 " fell in my way : which order, I am convinced, is the 
 " only one whereby any person can keep his own thoughts 
 " from sliding into other men's trains." Of course these re- 
 marks apply only to the didactic portion of the work. 
 
 It has been in the Author's contemplation to proceed 
 somewhat further with these dissertations ; and to add dis- 
 courses on the nature and quality of the laws of England, 
 as administered in the Supreme Courts of India, and on the 
 law of India, as administered in the Provinces. These 
 might be followed up by expositions of the course of judi- 
 cial procedure in the Supreme Courts (and particularly as 
 regards the administration of criminal laws,) and of the 
 course of judicial procedure in the Provincial Courts. It 
 will be allowed, perhaps, that such disquisitions, if ade- 
 quately treated, would not be without interest or without 
 use. It remains, however, to learn whether the reception of 
 this volume should encourage a repetition of the present expe- 
 
 • It has been remarked by a great ciitic and Philosopher (Dugald Stewart) that the 
 observations of no political writer " have been more frequently transcribed without 
 " acknowledgment," than those of Bodin. And, certainly, the palpable resemblance 
 of many of his positions, and much of his reasoning to those in the 1st and 6th of the 
 following Discourses would lead a learned reader to class their Author (but for his posi- 
 tive assertion to the contrary; as open to the same imputation. BoJin, however, 
 abounds in errors, and even absurdities ; and, had a transcriber used his pages, he 
 would hardly have avoided noticing, or refuting tin in. The Author has not done no 
 for the obvious reason that, at the time of writing, he was not aware of them.
 
 v { ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 rim'fent. In the mean time it has been announced, that Lord 
 Auckland's government has suggested to the Boards who 
 have the superintendence of Rational education in India, 
 the expediency of measures f6r engaging qualified indivi- 
 duals in the composition of various Elementary 1 reatises, 
 as manuals of public instruction— among which are very 
 judiciously included treatises on local law. It may be 
 reasonably hoped that individuals will be found ready to 
 engage in such an honourable duty, who are not only far 
 more conversant in the local law of India than the Author 
 of this work pretends to be — but who are more likely, from 
 their acquaintance with Oriental languages, and an intimate 
 knowledge of the mental character and disposition of the 
 Natives, to fall into a happier vein of composition. At all 
 events they will possess that requisite leisure for the task, 
 which this Author cannot command. 
 
 The Author has but one further observation to make — 
 which is upon his having affected to present, as well as to 
 dedicate, his work to the people of India. It is not that 
 he assumes to put any value upon it — it may be altogether 
 "worthless, and continue to be thought so. On the other 
 hand, it is possible that it may attain a higher degree of 
 attention than at present he can expect. In that case he 
 wishes it to be known that he claims no copyright. He 
 has so little of an Author's regard for his work, that he 
 cares not who may think fit to print it, or to extract from 
 it, or to use up any portion of it. He has been desirous of 
 affording a fair profit to the publisher of the first Edition- 
 fixing the price as low as is compatible with such profit— 
 and he has also fixed some price with a view to save him- 
 self from any serious pecuniary loss. But, if either of those 
 purposes are answered, he places no other restriction on 
 any benefit the Public is able to derive from this work. 
 
 Madras, May 30M/1841.
 
 * PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 Right Honorable Sir,] Gentlemen, and mij Friends, 
 
 1 am about to undertake a task, which I cannot hope 
 justly to fulfil ; but it is an effort in which any success what- 
 ever must diffuse wide and lasting benefits. I aim at open- 
 ing to the minds and reflection of the Native Community 
 a knowledge of the principles of government and of justice 
 — an acquaintance with the plan of government under 
 which they live— a knowledge of the nature of its laws, and 
 of the appointed course for the administration of justice un- 
 der them. 
 
 I have meditated much on the difficulties of this under- 
 taking ; and, now, on the entrance of my path, I pause in 
 hesitation and doubt. The only encouragement on which 
 I rely, and which animates me at this moment, is that zeal, 
 and that anxiety, which the spectacle before me of so nu- 
 merous a body of Natives of the first class proves. Other 
 feelings subside in gratification while addressing myself 
 to those who evince such an unequivocal desire of availing 
 themselves to the utmost of the means of improvement my 
 labours can offer. 
 
 * The substance of this address (a note of which was published at the 
 time) was delivered in the College Hall of Madias as the commence- 
 ment of a scries of Lectures on the present and other subjects. It is hero 
 republished as an introduction to the subsequent discourses. 
 
 t 'lhe Governor, Sir Fbedlkick Adam, was present.
 
 2 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 I have reason to know that you have become aware of 
 the honorable policy uhich for some years past has char- 
 acterized the measures of the governments, both of Eng- 
 land and India towards the Natives. The prospects and pri- 
 vileges now opened to you, of attaining to important offices 
 in the civil government of jour country, and in the admi- 
 nistration of its laws, are at the same time dependent on 
 your qualifications to sustain them. You have been for- 
 ward in shewing yourselves worthy of the opportunities thus 
 afforded of advancing your political and social position. 
 Much of this was expected of you by your fellow-subjects. 
 They have not been deceived. Be assured that .your en- 
 deavours will be cordially fostered by the government in 
 England ; and that the same disposition is felt in India re- 
 quires no better proof than the presence of the Governor and 
 of so many of the heads of society on the present occasion. 
 
 Of one voluntary effort on the part of the Hindoo com- 
 munity for the advancement of sound knowledge amongst 
 themselves it behoves me here to speak. I allude to the 
 institution of a Hindoo Literary Society, among the first 
 fruits of which is the undertaking in which I am now engag- 
 ed. I am gratified to find that this Society has deemed the 
 principles of government and of law, the plan of power, 
 the quality of the laws under which they live, and the ad- 
 ministration of those laws, to be among the most valuable 
 departments of useful knowledge. Under this impression 
 seme of its most respected members have from time to 
 time consulted me on the best method of prosecuting their 
 own studies or of directing the application' of others ; 
 and it is scarce necessary to inform those versed in learn- 
 ing of this nature, and who are acquainted with the pre- 
 sent progress of your community in English literature, 
 that no satisfactory advice could be afforded. I might 
 point in vain to the learned works of European scholars in 
 politics and in laws ; I might look in vain amongs't these 
 works for the most elementary opening of such branches
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 3 
 
 of knowledge, such as might at once be adapted to the 
 peculiar circumstances which characterise the present con- 
 dition of the people of this Empire, and to their present 
 state of mental cultivation. 
 
 All that I could accomplish in furtherance of these honor- 
 able desires — all that lies in my power in advancing that 
 great interest in the native public at large to become worthy 
 of the prospects placed before them— I am now about to 
 attempt. I have thought it possible to effect something for 
 the public benefit, in bringing before your view, through 
 an easy and popular style of delivery, such as I now 
 aim at, some outline of the principles of Government, 
 of Justice, and of Law — some intelligible explana- 
 tions of what plan of government, and what course in 
 th« administration of the law, prevails throughout this 
 your native land. To these my best services 1 bid you 
 welcome. I hope to excite at least an impulse in your minds 
 to consider the vast national importance of your progress in 
 this department of knowledge, on which all your dearest 
 interests are wound up. Hereafter (and the sooner that 
 time arrives the better) you, or those who come after you, will 
 better attain such information through Boobs and Treatises 
 adapted to your progress in literature and experience in life. 
 
 Let me endeavour to engage your attention by enlarging 
 swhat further on topics calculated to infuse a desire and 
 Confidence on your parts in the pursuit to which 1 invite you, 
 and at the sain \ time to cheer my own spirit at this com- 
 1 1 of my lab urs. If we rest our momentary no- 
 
 tice on the early and feeble beginnings of a great work, 
 how insignificant do they appear— but that our contempla- 
 is are soon absorbed in the worth and magnificence of the 
 work designed, llosv trivial a thing in itself is the first 
 plunge of the pi mghshare in the wild soil of a wasted 
 country. — how animating an I sublime the vision of expand- 
 ed fertility to which it directs our thoughts. Let us not be
 
 4 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS 
 
 disinheartened at the quality of these our first attempts, nor 
 by the apprehension of the little we may accomplish. I call 
 to mind what were the fears and sensations of one,* who, 
 in opening to the view of my own countrymen in England 
 a systematic display of the nature of the English law and 
 government, proved in the result one of the greatest be- 
 nefactors of his age. I call to mind what were his feelings 
 when, without patronage, or office, or duty, he first on a 
 mere voluntary engagement, and before a few private 
 students, undertook that task which afterwards became the 
 source of a vast national boon, and of his own perpetual 
 fame. 
 
 Pretensions such as these I do not advance — but I can- 
 not fail to draw encouragement from the similarity of our 
 undertakings. This eminent man, meditating upon the 
 duty cast on every enlightened citizen to become acquaint- 
 ed in some degree with the laws of his country, and 
 mindful how necessary was the profound study of those 
 laws to all who sought professional or political distinction, 
 points out in forcible language how discouraging, even 
 to the English student, was the entrance to the study of 
 the law —without public direction in what course to pur- 
 sue his enquiries — no private assistance to remove the dis- 
 tresses and difficulties which will always embarrass a be- 
 ginner ; so that the student might be left to a tedious 
 lonely process of extracting from a mass of undigested 
 learning : and, he adds, it was little to be wondered at, 
 under disadvantages like these, that men of moderate capa- 
 cily confused themselves at first setting out, and continued 
 dark and puzzled during the remainder of their lives. 
 
 If with these considerations on his mind this learned and 
 patriotic man resolved to devote his talents and acquirements 
 
 * Sir William Blackstone, the author of the Commentaries on the 
 Laws of England.
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. £ 
 
 to that great object in which his success was so conspicuous 
 — how much more forcibly do the prese_nt difficulties which 
 overwhelm the efforts of the native community of India to 
 attain to this valuable knowledge appeal for assistance. To- 
 wards such an object, indeed, I might venture to trust that 
 my present services are not ill-directed. But how am I to 
 disguise, and how can I explain a way, those difficulties 
 which, not only the very nature of my task, but the peculiar 
 quality of my audience must necessarily oppose to my suc- 
 cess. The subjects on which I am about to discourse are 
 in themselves profound and, to any but an attentive and an 
 intelligent mind, repulsive. When Blackstone addressed 
 himself to well educated English youths, burning with a de- 
 sire to enter on those studies on which their fame or fortune 
 were to depend, he could not refrain from expressing his 
 fears lest an inadequate manner might beget a distaste 
 to the learning he aimed at imparting, or lest a defective 
 execution should leave a blight upon its fruits. Gifted with 
 an eloquence that could charm attention — abounding in all 
 the requisite knowledge — and addressing an assembly of 
 scholars, as greedy to receive instruction, as competent and 
 willing to applaud his labour — he, nevertheless, hesitated at 
 the thought of a failure which might hinder, rather than ad- 
 vance, the object of his rational hopes. 
 
 But if any such considerations could justify diffidence in 
 him — I cannot deny that they operate with far greater 
 weight on my own reflection. Neither can I shut out from 
 my own view — nor will 1 attempt to do so from yours — 
 other more discouraging obstacles to my success. I cannot 
 but be conscious how incapable I may be deemed of so ex- 
 pressing myself in a language not your own, as at once to 
 carry with me your comprehension, and to give due effect 
 to my meaning. The novelty of such studies as these — your 
 indistinct and unconsidered notions of government, and of 
 law — your peculiar tenets of religion and of caste — your pe- 
 culiar domestic habits —and your very modes of thinking
 
 6 
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 and of expression, so widely differing from those of my own 
 countrymen— these are all sources of perplexity, which, if 
 they do not overwhelm me with despondence, palpably warn 
 me of what I have to struggle against. 
 
 Such are without disguise the obstacles in our path — let 
 us turn our more cheerful regard to those means by which 
 through our united exertions we may surmount them — never 
 losing sight of the noble result we aspire to, in the advance- 
 ment of the best and national interests of your community. 
 
 I would first exhort you not to distrust your own men- 
 tal powers, or the effects of persevering labour at improve- 
 ment. Mad I attempted ten years ago to address myself 
 to the native community at Bombay as I now address this 
 audience, I doubt if three natives could be found there to 
 whom I should have made myself intelligible. Were 1 now 
 to invite such an attendance in that city, I am fully per- 
 suaded that more than one hundred enlightened and 
 anxious students would flock to such a call. To what 
 powerful cause was this to be attributed? To the pa- 
 triotic wisdom and to the energy of one man — who made it 
 the care of his government that the plain — the infinite — 
 advantages of sound knowledge should be unfolded to the 
 view of the heads of native society in that presidency. 
 To Mr. Elphinstone, and the zealous and able agents of his 
 policy in forwarding the same cause in which I am engag- 
 ed, are your neighbours indebted for that extraordinary 
 advancement, both political and social, which cannot fail 
 to have attracted your admiration and interest. But, were 
 I to compare the condition of the native community of 
 that presidency, as I first knew it, in point of acquaint- 
 ance with the English language, and progress in literary 
 acquirements, with the position of yourselves at this mo- 
 ment, I can feel no hesitation in declaring the superiori- 
 ty to be with you. But the necessary effects, and the value 
 of mental cultivation (and I know of no more important
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 7 
 
 objects of it than those I propose to discuss) have been fully 
 appreciated by your Bombay fellow- subjects. The better 
 orders have seconded by their own zealous exertions the 
 efforts of their English friends— and their reward has been 
 almost as immediate as it has proved lasting. 
 
 The infinite advantages, indeed, of a liberal education it 
 is quite needless I should expatiate upon, and it may be 
 thought by some that your need of them, and your partial 
 acquaintance even with the language in which 1 address 
 you, must preclude altogether any effectual progress in the 
 higher departments of knowledge through such a medium 
 of instruction as I resort to. Some little experience 
 in intercourse with such members of our community as 
 I see before me has inspired me with better hopes. I 
 do indeed believe that any elaborated treatise, thus deli- 
 vered verbally, must necessarily fail of practical success 
 —and, although such a work might, or at least may 
 hereafter, prove an useful assistance to those who nobly de- 
 dicate themselves to such studies (provided it should be 
 adapted to your present circumstances and condition) yet 
 it could only become so by being used as a source of private 
 labour and meditation. These considerations have prompted 
 the mode of addressing you which I propose to pursue. By 
 delivering myself, to the best of my endeavours, in the fami- 
 liar language rather of conversation than of lecture, I may 
 perhaps not only become the easier understood, but 1 may 
 better draw out your attention and interest towards the sub- 
 jects I discuss. I can take opportunities of repeating anel 
 enforcing in various ways topics not at first clear to your per- 
 ception — and I may attract (as I now invite) your own per- 
 sonal inquiries anel discussion as we proceed. Let us not 
 despair, therefore, of effectual progress together in thes:e new 
 and unexplored paths. Come jou with B sincere desire to 
 understand what you ought not to feel satisfied in not under- 
 standing-*- be you but willing to learn, anel resolute in pay- 
 ing •attention— and I think I jnay safely promise that you 
 will not go thanklessly away
 
 s 
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 Connected with these hopes it is but fair and just that I 
 should remind you ot" the many examples of wise and talervted 
 men who have from time to time adorned the annals of your 
 native history — and left their memory for your encouragement 
 to dismiss all idle apprehensions of knowledge of this nature 
 being too high for you. From old times down to the present 
 moment, many have arisen among you who truly deserved 
 the titles of moralists, of statesmen, of lawgivers. It is im- 
 possible but that most of you have often heard the name of 
 Menu — and there are many other ancient writers whose 
 maxims and doctrines I might quote with respect. The pro- 
 gress of the Mahometans of many countries in literature is 
 well known and appreciated ; and I do but repeat, what in, 
 justice has often been acknowledged, that the European 
 nations owe much of their advancement to the learning of 
 Mahometans in the deeper and more useful branches of 
 knowledge and science. The Madras System of Education 
 has been the source, also, of a valuable boon to the whole 
 European world, as exemplifying the plan of mutual instruc- 
 tion now so common in the schools of England, which has 
 produced astonishing effects in disseminating the elements 
 of knowledge throughout the youthful classes of the people. 
 
 True, indeed, it is, that this learning, these maxims, and 
 these doctrines of Eastern Sages, are characterized with 
 many errors and defects— (so my own reason compels me 
 to avow) — and no system of political government or of 
 jurisprudence has ever yet been taught or prevailed in 
 these countries but such as falls far short of the intellectual 
 standard of those systems generally prevailing in Europe. 
 But it serves sufficiently the objects of our present meeting 
 to know, that strength of mind, much knowledge of human 
 nature, much sagacity and quickness of apprehension are 
 abundantly testified — and perhaps it required but that the 
 minds of these eminent men should have been regulated and 
 directed by the same bias as that which swayed the studies 
 of the great men of Europe, to have enabled them to ex- 
 hibit similar results.
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS, g 
 
 Are you then the true descendants of such honored coun- 
 trymen — or are we to suppose that your, faculties are no 
 longer the same ? Happily our own personal experience has 
 proved to us the contrary. You have all heard of Ham Mo- 
 hun Hoy — you know that he has earned the credit of an 
 excellent English scholar and writer. I can further assure 
 you that his advice and opinions have been consulted — not 
 without real advantage — by the ablest statesmen in Eng- 
 land on subjects connected with the good government of 
 this country, and the mode of administering justice within 
 it. Here is a plain proof that there is no deficiency of 
 capacity, or of talent, for pursuits such as those to which I 
 invite your attention, among the natives of this country. 
 I am enabled also to state, from the communication of 
 one who knew him well (Sir John Malcolm) the name and 
 genius of another eminent individual gifted with anilities 
 which, if they did not form the plan of government of an 
 Empire, were qualified for even so exalted a task. I speak 
 of Poorneah, who was the Dewan of Mysore, at the period 
 of the deposition of Tippo Saib and his family. Many days 
 of discussion — many of anxious thought — were devoted by 
 two of the greatest statesmen of this age, the Great Duke 
 of Wellington (then Sir Arthur Wellesley) and Sir Barry 
 Close, in settling the future plan of government to be 
 administered -but Sir John Malcolm, who was present at 
 those discussions, informed me that, after all, the able sug- 
 gestions of Poorneah were those finally confided in. 
 
 In naming before you Sir John Malcolm, who was per- 
 sonally known to several of you now present, I call on you, 
 my native friends, to revere the memory of that man : for 
 he was one who truly loved, and laboured for, and served 
 this country. He had his faults — which some called vani- 
 ties—but they were faults which testified a clear and noble 
 spirit — for they were of a kind which proved the first ambi- 
 tion, of his heart was to be useful to mankind.
 
 JO niELIMlNARY ADDRESS. 
 
 But, before I quit this topic, I must commemorate one 
 more native individual, lately living among us, whose sound 
 judgment, and many acquirements raised him to a very con- 
 spicuous eminence as well in the estimation of us Englishmen, 
 as in that of the native community of this place. I allude to 
 one whom I need not name, who was the author of the En- 
 glish document I hold in my hand ; which, in the force and 
 accuracy of its language, as well as in the expanded views it 
 unfolds, evinces at once a capacity and a cultivation of intel- 
 lect which I can hardly desire should be surpassed by any who 
 honor me at this moment wilh their attention. In reading 
 this his solemn dying advice to his sons, I warm in'admira- 
 tion of a mind soaring above all local prejudices, and preg- 
 nant with the wisdom of a reflecting experience. How just, 
 how clear, how convincing, and how weighty is every sen- 
 tence in which he inculcates those lessons of independence, 
 of self-government, and self-exertion, which he shews ought 
 to supersede all slavish bonds of ignorant customs ! In leav- 
 ing this his best legacy to his children, he may be said to 
 have left a legacy to human kind.* 
 
 * The document was the Will of Chinnatoraby Moodelly, which verba- 
 tim inhis own English ended as follows:— "With a view to the real welfare 
 ' of my said Sons, and considering that a life of activity and persever- 
 ' ance is the only certain path to independence and respectability, I 
 " earnestly recommend that they shall respectively on attaining the age 
 " of 21 year3 establish themselves in separate houses, each living on his 
 " own separate means, and by his own separate acquisitions, in the sole 
 " enjoyment of the fruits of his own industry, as this mode of life will 
 " be the best adapted to avoid internal domestic disputes and quarrels, 
 u which too frequently occur where too many persons compose a family, 
 " and are interested in a joint common stock ; in which latter case the 
 " idle, the illiterate, and ill -principled live in indolence and waste at the 
 ' expence of the diligent, ingenious, and industrious members of the 
 ' same family. My reason for giving this recommendation proceeds 
 ' from my own observation through life, and from conviction that a 
 «' state of dependence equals that of slavery ; as he that has a. confidence 
 " in the support of another, seldom has ambition to support himself 
 " for his own advancement, and consequently neglects the improvement
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. \\ 
 
 And when I thus presume to scan and measure the 
 scope of your intellectual powers, and profess to test 
 the quality of your means of comprehension— when I con- 
 trast what may be your present position in these respects, 
 with that advancement to which your neighbours of the 
 other presidencies have arrived, and to which this my hum- 
 ble effort is aimed at contributing — can I be unmindful of 
 what history has proclaimed of the English Nation— from 
 what a debasement to what an eminence it has emerged, 
 through the influence of equal laws and a well constituted 
 form of government ? You see before you the scanty por- 
 tion of a distant people— and that portion subdivided in 
 petty societies, and scattered individually throughout a 
 country ten times larger than their native land, and amidst 
 a population outnumbering them more than teu thousand 
 fold. You learn that by the force of their arms, or by the 
 wisdom of their political measures, vast kingdoms have 
 been brought under their sway — you see that a mighty and 
 extended empire is governed throughout all its branches, in 
 peace and prosperity, under the guardianship as it were of 
 one master spirit. You observe that by their arts of com- 
 merce new kinds of wealth are spread over the country — 
 new lines of industry are opened — new sources of national in- 
 terest are flowing. The question arises in your minds 
 instinctively — how were these wonders atchieved ? — and a 
 moment's reflection supplies the instant answer. By their 
 wise and well established government— by their just and 
 well administered laws — this people have thus arisen : By 
 their energy, of soul and character, by their advancement 
 beyond their fellow-men in science, in the arts of life, and 
 in knowledge of every quality, have they commanded means 
 
 " of his mind, having little or no occasion for the exercise of genius or 
 " penetration, owing to hie being a stranger to business and indifferent 
 " about his own reputation, or the good opinion which respectable and 
 " praiseworthy characters never fail to establish in the world by a strict 
 " adherence to instruction aud useful pursuits."
 
 12 
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 which could not be resisted, and founded Kmpires where they 
 but recently sought reception among strangers. But, should 
 I call you from this contemplation, and picture to your ima- 
 ginations the original race from which this people descend- 
 ed, I should summon you to behold savage hordes of men, 
 roving through woods and wastes, without clothing — at a pe- 
 riod whenlndia contained flourishing cities and well cultivated 
 plains, swarming with a people who lived under regular go- 
 vernments, and who were almost as far advanced in civiliza- 
 tion and in the agreeable arts of life, as they were one hun- 
 dred years ago. Judge for yourselves, then, what are the 
 true sources of national advancement ; and doubt <not that 
 the same mental cultivation may accomplish for the people of 
 India that which it has effected for a nation of barbarians. 
 
 It was the lot of the English nation, in these ancient 
 times, to be invaded by a people whose empire was more 
 powerful and extended than even that of England at the 
 present moment. Borne down at once to subjection they 
 gained from their conquerors far more than a compensation 
 in the introduction of such laws and regular government 
 as soon raised them from a savage state into that of civi- 
 lization. Cities were founded, fertility overspread the 
 plains, the arts of peace began to flourish, and literature 
 began to raise her schools where the beasts of the forest had 
 but lately ranged. 
 
 But events which change the destinies of Empires and of 
 mankind drew from the laud those conquerors who had be- 
 come protectors — and the helpless natives, bereft of the su- 
 perintendence of a regular authority, and a prey to internal 
 divisions, soon relapsed into almost their former condition of 
 privation and misery. A letter which they addressed for 
 succour to their late governors (I speak of the Roman peo« 
 pie), who had been compelled to abandon them for the pro- 
 tection of their own immediate homes, was entitled " The 
 u groans of the Britons." [' The Barbarians," they say,
 
 1'RELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 13 
 
 " drive us into the sea ; the sea throws us back on the 
 " barbarians. We have but the hard choice to perish either 
 " by the waves or the sword." Such was the state of the Bri- 
 tish people some fourteen hundred years ago — sunk once 
 more into their original ignorance and helplessness, at. a pe- 
 riod when India was composed of many wealthy and luxuri- 
 ous nations, living from age to age under the influence of 
 settled laws and organized governments. 
 
 I could hardly fail of exciting your interest in tracing the 
 progressive history of the English nation from so wretched 
 a political condition ; and it would not be altogether foreign 
 from the object of my present address to do so. But I 
 must restrain myself to a passing glance. 
 
 With many bloody struggles against a new invasion of 
 foreign foes — after many desolating wars throughout, all 
 parts of I he country — after two hundred years of confusion 
 and internal disorders during which neither laws nor litera- 
 ture could find a resting place, nor scarce a government 
 existed but in name — the English at last became again an 
 united people under one settled and constituted plan of 
 power. Then first began to be laid, under the superin- 
 tendence of one of the wisest of monarchs, the foundations 
 of a regulated system of government and of the adminis- 
 tration of justice, from which has gradually sprung (after 
 many vicissitudes) that splendid structure of political power 
 and digested laws which has become a model for other 
 nations to imitate. 'The details, indeed, of this system, 
 such as it existed in early times, were very different from 
 such as characterize that of the present enlightened period ; 
 but you will learn with some interest that in many parti- 
 culars they resembled such as by long custom have prevailed 
 in many parts of India. In ': id, as in India, Villages 
 
 had their Head-men; and many Villages, forming one Dis- 
 trict, were under the control of one magisterial chief. 
 There too, as here, it was a custom for Villages to supply
 
 14 
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 certain of their inhabitants to be pledges for the good 
 behaviour of the rest — districts for inhabitants of districts 
 — and cities for the dwellers within cities. It is at least a 
 curious, if not an instructive, circumstance to mention that 
 it was also customary at this early period of English history, 
 when well considered laws began to be made and promulgat- 
 ed, for certain persons best acquainted with those laws and 
 the course of administering justice to discourse before as- 
 semblies of the people, in the way of Lectures, upon those 
 regulations and ordinances, which the public were called upon 
 to obey. Some attempts, moreover, were made to digest into 
 a regular code the whole body of the prevailing laws and 
 customs of the people — and not without success. 
 
 But now occurred another invasion by a multitude of 
 foreigners — the ruling power was overthrown — strangers 
 succeeded to paramount authority — and, then, as too gene- 
 rally happens upon such violent political change, a long and 
 miserable period of oppression and wrong ensued. The 
 land became tilled with but two classes, the foreign con- 
 querors and their dependents. 
 
 At this crisis, however, of their third invasion, the people 
 had already arisen to the rank of an independent nation. 
 They had already felt the pride of self-government, as well 
 as experienced the incalculable advantages of equal laws. 
 They were never destined again to be subdued, or to fall 
 beneath the weight of arbitrary power. It was in vain that 
 a series of wilful or imperious monarchs, or that the band 
 of their attendant chiefs who overspread the realm, essayed 
 by new and burthensome mandates to destroy their spirit, 
 or overthrow their institutions. They still claimed their 
 ancient laws and customs as their rules of right and secu- 
 rity—they still exerted themselves to obtain a settled and 
 regular course of government, under which, through constitu- 
 ted forms, the voice of the people at large might be "heard, 
 and the general interests be the better pursued. As useful
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. ]5 
 
 knowledge became more and more diffused, and as men- 
 tal cultivation advanced, the people ^ould not fail to 
 be further encouraged in their efforts, in proportion as 
 they observed the evils of uncertain and uncontrolled 
 authority, and contrasted them with the benefits of ascer- 
 tained rights. They sought, therefore, their ancient insti- 
 tutions, and loved their ancient laws — not because they 
 were old, but because experience had taught them they 
 were beneficial. For, as intelligence prevails, men become 
 reconciled, however slowly, to the abandonment of the dear- 
 est and most inveterate prejudices which reason condemns ; 
 while they will at the same time contend against constitut- 
 ed authorities even for new principles of law and govern- 
 ment which their deliberate judgment shall have approved. 
 In the end the true cause of the English people triumphed. 
 Their last invaders found their best interests in becoming 
 united in rights and in duties with those whom they had 
 begun by oppressing. By slow gradations, and after several 
 hundred years, a peaceful and settled government was 
 once more established — based on certain and just laws 
 towards the people, and on well arranged forms as regarded 
 the security and strength of the supreme power of the State. 
 
 I date the period as no longer back than about four 
 hundred years, when, the frame and outline of the English 
 plan of government having been thus placed on settled 
 foundations, and the administration of justice now proceed- 
 ing on ascertained rules and principles, the qualities of both 
 began to form the subjects of general study among the 
 best educated and superior classes of the community. 
 Long previously, indeed, schools of law existed, and many 
 learned persons had during the course of two or three 
 centuries taken up the task of expounding portions of the 
 national jurisprudence — to which circumstance the acknow- 
 ledged merit to which in aftertimes it attained has been 
 said to be greatly owing. But, at this latter period, the pro- 
 gress of these national laws towards perfection had suggested
 
 16 
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 the redaction of them into some regular order, such as gave 
 to them the character and dignity of a science ; and it be- 
 gan to be evident that on the learning of its professors must 
 depend in no small degree the maintenance of those laws, 
 and with them the security and the prosperity of the whole 
 people. 
 
 The course adopted for inculcating a public sense of the 
 value of these important studies, and of instructing the 
 class of aspirants at this most distinguished of all the 
 branches of human knowledge, was mainly by the delivery 
 of public lectures. You imagine to yourselves a Jiterary 
 people, reposing in internal peace ; amongst whom the arts 
 of life had already spread plenty and refinement, and minis- 
 tered leisure for the highest mental occupation. Not so. 
 The students who at this period, to the number of 2000, 
 are said to have flocked around the fountains of 
 legal knowledge, and all of them members of the highest 
 class of the English people, lived in cities for the most part 
 built of wood and clay, and were content with earthern 
 floors in their houses strewed with rushes in the place of 
 carpets. In the self same age we learn that Beejapoor exist- 
 ed in all its grandeur. We read of the Emperor of India step- 
 ping forth from his marble palace— and Akbar, reigning over 
 thousands of flourishing cities and a population of one hun- 
 dred million souls, surveyed the sources of a nation's wealth 
 and prosperity, and found his empire to be the richest on the 
 earth. Pausing in meditation on the varied subsequent 
 fortunes of these two countries, who cannot see in the gra- 
 dual decay of the one, and in the astonishing advancement 
 of the other, wherein lies the real and permanent strength 
 of a nation ? Who is so cold in feeling as not to gather ex- 
 citement from such thoughts, as the path to national honor 
 opens to his view ? 
 
 These Lectures I have spoken of, delivered to a compara- 
 tively rude and unrefined people, making their early efforts
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 17 
 
 in the attainment of political and legal science, under equal 
 disadvantages with yourselves, were of £ar inferior extent 
 and merit to those afterwards commenced by the great ex- 
 pounder of English law in modern times — Blackstone. In 
 the progress of three or four centuries, as the national power 
 and greatness increased, so also increased the commerce, 
 the wealth, and the population of England — and in proportion 
 with that increase necessarily accumulated the laws which 
 regulated the enjoyment of rights and of property. As 
 education also became more generally diffused among the 
 people, it might be presumed that the quality of the laws 
 would improve, and the true principles of a just and stable 
 government become better understood. But, now, at a 
 period when the interests of the people most required that 
 their laws and rights should be thoroughly known and guard- 
 ed, not only had these laws become a mass so vast and in- 
 coherent, from want of some system originally in the enact- 
 ment and promulgation of them, as almost to defy the grasp 
 of the human intellect, but the custom also of expounding 
 them through scholastic lectures had gradually ceased from 
 the same cause. It was then that the master-mind of 
 Blackstone conceived the design of digesting into one con- 
 sistent whole an exposition of all those general rules of law 
 on which the government of England, the rights of persons, 
 the security of property, and the well-being of society 
 throughout all its gradations, were founded. And he did 
 not undertake a task too mighty for his accomplishment. 
 In four short volumes he has described an outline, which, 
 though faintly marked in some parts, encircles the whole 
 body of the English law, 
 
 I have thus traced, though by slight allusions, the progress 
 of the English people, of its government, and of its laws— 
 because true history, which teaches wisdom by examples, 
 reads a more impressive lesson to those who will think, than 
 any which the most eloquent reasoning could supply. That 
 we may turn such a lesson to account, let us take a survey
 
 jg PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 of that political prospect, which now, if you, the people, 
 will begin your carper in rivalling the prosperity and power 
 of other nations, lies before you. Let us contemplate what 
 are those hopes, and objects, and advantages, which all per- 
 suade an acquaintance with your government and its laws. 
 
 The people of India now for the first time in the known 
 history of the world live under a stable government, the 
 power of which is too widely extended, and too firmly con- 
 solidated, to be easily shaken, either by external foes or in- 
 ternal disorders. And this consideration carries with it, 
 indeed, the promise of those chief national blessings,, securi- 
 ty and peace : but, how far your union in interests with the 
 greatest of nations may assure you of more extensive privi- 
 leges than what depend on the mere strength of government 
 —in short, of those valuable rights and means which distin- 
 guish your fellow-subjects, and have rendered them what you 
 find them to be— must depend on the policy of the governing 
 powers under which your lot is cast. Of that honorable po- 
 licy I have already spoken, and I should not find it difficult 
 to corroborate by instances its liberal quality. You have be- 
 come witnesses of its disposition to advance the common pros- 
 perity through eqval andjixed laws— its measures for facilita- 
 ting your access to office and authority must have been felt 
 by those who have inquired. If you shall look around you, 
 to mark what is doing at the other presidencies, you will 
 find that the promulgation of those arts and sciences which 
 most contribute to the happiness of mankind has become 
 the public care. Nor need I to point out to your notice the 
 increasing spread of commercial enterprise, which must ever 
 be the most copious source of wealth and civilization, or its 
 attending benefits in advancing a more social intercourse 
 among all classes. All these considerations, be assured, af- 
 ford proofs of that liberal policy which aims at uniting the 
 ■whole community through the same interests. Neither can 
 wealth abound, nor the arts flourish, nor distinctions in so-
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS; 19 
 
 ciety be coveted, where the government is oppressive, or the 
 laws unequal : for justice in government is the staff of peace 
 and of honor. 
 
 If these are the national prospects before the people of 
 India, it surely behoves you to reflect on their value, and 
 lend your endeavours in warding off all disastrous change. 
 The evils of foreign conquest, or of the overthrow of a set- 
 tled government, those who have experienced can never find 
 language to express. But, unless you have some knowledge 
 of the nature and plan of your government, and of your 
 general and common duties under it, you cannot have a sense 
 of its benefit. While you shall obey without reason — while 
 you shall be incapable of forming an attachment or an inter- 
 est towards those laws under which you live, from ignorance 
 of their quality, what aversion can there arise in your mind 
 to change, or union and firmness in resisting it ? That 
 national virtue which is a peculiar characteristic of a great 
 people, and which the English call loyalty, is not more an 
 attachment to any monarch, or particular family of monarchs, 
 than a love for the plan of power, and system of law, upon 
 which the prosperity and glory of the country depends. 
 Upon this principle of loyalty men are always found ready 
 to sacrifice all they have, and their very lives also, for the 
 preservation of their country's independence. But of this 
 noble virtue you can have no just notion while unable to 
 value or understand that which is its only source. Having no 
 other care or object but to obey — incapable of judging the 
 difference between any two modes of government —content 
 to live as servants — you would cast aside all hopes of further 
 advancement, and he ever the prey to oppressors whom 
 your indifference to change had most served to invite. 
 
 Thus may you be led to perceive that it is a duty which 
 all good citizens, who aspire to share the full benefits of a 
 liberal government, owe to the slate, to become more or less, 
 according to their means and circumstances, acquainted with
 
 20 
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 the nature of the laws under which they live. So much so, 
 that in that state, which once was the mistress of the civiliz- 
 ed world, the very boys were obliged to learn its funda- 
 mental laws. But it is not merely a duty — it is a most im- 
 portant personal concern to every one of you who listen to 
 me, and who look to be entrusted with a share in the offices 
 of authority. How can you expect to exercise the functions 
 of such offices in acknowledged ignorance of the duties they 
 impose? What but contempt can pursue the mischievous 
 efforts of such unqualified persons ? Can it be expected, for 
 instance, that those can be qualified to act as magistrates 
 who know none of the rules which the law lays down for the 
 detection of crime and the awarding of punishment ? But, 
 whether as magistrates, or as grand jurymen, or as jury- 
 men, you should ever understand that you will be required 
 to exercise your functions as by law provided, and not 
 according to mere natural sense or the human will— for 
 nothing is less to be trusted to, as between the magistrates 
 and the people, than the human passions, or the varying 
 suggestions of half- informed natural sense. 
 
 I hope the time may not be far distant when, not only 
 in the Provincial Courts, but also in the highest, such 
 duties as myself and others exercise therein will be shared 
 by individuals chosen from among tho native community. 
 But those who aspire to the higher stations in the de- 
 partment of the laws must acquire that sufficient knowledge 
 of its rules as to enable them to advise on the rights and 
 remedies which certain and fixed laws declare. Much shall 
 I rejoice if, even in my time, some of the rising genera- 
 tion shall be incited under the guidance of these principles 
 to undertake a profession of so honorable a character : for £ 
 am of opinion that the laws of this land will never be ad- 
 ministered with their fullest and most beneficial effects, 
 until practitioners shall be selected from the natives them-
 
 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 21 
 
 selves — beginning with (hose who shall first surmount the 
 
 difficulties which at present beset their way. 
 
 • 
 
 It is not, however, to such alone that I now address myself. 
 I hope to awaken an interest, and to stir that spirit within 
 you, which, after generating a conviction in your own minds 
 that some knowledge of your government and of the laws 
 is every enlightened man's concern, shall diffuse its influ- 
 ence over your community at large, and produce its fruit 
 in aftertimes. 
 
 To you, then, whose honorable zeal in so noble a cause 
 has brought you from the ease and habits of your homes 
 in search of knowledge, however hard to find — to you, 
 who set your fellow-countrymen an example never, I trust 
 to be forgotten among them, and advance from the foremost 
 ranks of your society to render yourselves but as pupils and 
 children before a teacher— to you I earnestly appeal to pur- 
 sue the path you have thus begun to tread. Among you the 
 liyht of knowledge must first spread -as the dawn must 
 first gild the summits before it pierces to the levels and 
 depths. Be mindful of those great benefits you thus pre- 
 pare to hand down to your children's children. Let the 
 difficulties and embarrassments, which may now attend your 
 efforts in mature life to acquire the elements of that know- 
 ledge which most interests you as a people, teach you to 
 weigh well the better means held out to your children 
 through education. 
 
 Turn your reflection on the prospects of prosperity held 
 out to your country through the diffusion of that valuable 
 knowledge in political government — in rights — and in the 
 laws, on which alone national welfare can be based. Cherish 
 these feelings, as they may arise in your own breasts ; en- 
 courage them as they may spring up in the contemplation 
 of others. Then may I hope for the day — and that not far 
 off— when one from among yourselves shall worthily fill this
 
 22 PRELIMINARY ADDRESS. 
 
 place which I now assume. Then may you trust that many 
 will be born among you, who shall pass through a life of 
 usefulness, and honor, and dignity, in the service of their 
 country, and bequeath their illustrious example for the be- 
 nefit of a grateful posterity.
 
 DISCOURSE I. 
 
 Of the Principles of Government. 
 
 o 
 
 F the quality and usefulness of the Science of 
 Political Government. Of the Origin of Political Go- 
 vernment. Of the Objects of Political Government. 
 Of the necessity of a settled Plan of Power— or a Con- 
 stitution. Of the Marks and Characteristics of a well- 
 constituted Government : First ; attention due to the Habits, 
 Feelings, and Manners of the People. Second; Changes 
 should not be sudden. Third ; the External and JVatural 
 Condition of a country, and of its inhabitants to be ob- 
 served. Fourth; of the Share wliich the people should 
 have in the administratio7i of the Government. That the 
 share of the people in the government to be exercised by 
 means of a system of Representation. Reflections on the 
 marks and characteristics of good government which have 
 been discussed; and on the political condition of India. 
 Of the evils of Arbitrary Government.
 
 DISCOURSE. I. 
 
 On the Principles of Government. 
 
 SECTION I. 
 
 Of the quality and usefulness of the Science of 
 Political Goiiernment. 
 
 
 \ purpose in my present address to discourse on the nature 
 of Political Government, and on its true principles. This 
 is a topic the due investigation of which requires much 
 thought, and extensive reading. It has exercised the most 
 powerful minds throughout all ages. The doctrines from 
 time to time laid down on this subject have been the result 
 of much insight into human nature, and of a careful com- 
 parison of the laws, the manners, and the history of many 
 nations. The proof and explanation of those doctrines have 
 taxed the intellectual faculties to the utmost. And those 
 who would study the quality of Political Government, with 
 a view to practical application in public life, must bring with 
 them habits of reflection, and a vigor of mind, beyond the 
 ordinary endowments of mankind. 
 
 It would, therefore, be a vain thing in me to deceive the 
 reader into an impression that through the course of one 
 short Lecture T could afford that complete information in the 
 Science of Political Government, which scarce any single 
 voluminous treatise could supply. And some may perhaps 
 feel disheartened at a commencement in my labours, which 
 announces a call upon their attention, such as may be ap- 
 prehended to be almost beyond their present capacity, and 
 which at the same time appears to promise but very inade- 
 quate results. But to such let me hasten to say that the 
 labours of many distinguished Philosophers of various coun- 
 tries have already furnished for the instruction of mankind 
 a number of general and indisputable positions or principles,
 
 05 O^ THE PRINCIPLES OP GOVERNMENT. 
 
 the truth and value of which will be found by no means dif- 
 ficult of comprehension — and to all, let me say, that, con- 
 fining myself to such fundamental rules, I trust to attract 
 some interest in the discussion of them, and to satisfy my 
 readers that such a discussion is entirely appropriate to ob- 
 jects we have in view. 
 
 In all well-governed countries there are certain right 
 principles to be looked for, as distinguishing the plan of 
 power which prevails, whence justice must flow, and where- 
 on depend the well-being and the prospective advancement 
 of the people at large. It is obviously fit that all those su- 
 perior members of society who aim at understanding and 
 contributing towards the welfare of their country should 
 form clear notions of what these right principles are. But, 
 more especially should it be a care with those who, warmed 
 with that zeal for useful knowledge which I have endeavour- 
 ed to excite, desire an acquaintance with the quality of the 
 English Government. Those who, like myself, have been 
 bred under the protection of that form of government, and 
 who have had occasion to study its character, have been led 
 to the conviction that there never has existed in any other 
 country a system of government so powerful and so just — 
 so calculated to defend the rights of individuals — to ensure 
 the upright and effectual administration of justice, between 
 man and man — and to protect every subject from violence 
 and wrong. But it is for the people of India, as well as 
 for their English rulers, to form a true judgment of the nature 
 and value of the English plan of government, out of which 
 is derived that under which they live, by conceiving just 
 impressions as to what are the characteristics of good go- 
 vernment. And my persuasion is that, the better the just 
 principles of Political Government are known, the more 
 firmly will the people of India become attached to the Bri- 
 tish rule, and the better prepared will they be to understand 
 and to assist in improving that plan of government, and 
 that system of law, under which their own rights are to be 
 protected, and their political hopes advanced.
 
 SECTION II. 
 
 Of the origin of Political Government. 
 
 The origin of government must be traced to human nature 
 itself. The helplessness of infancy falls necessarily under the 
 protection called forth from the natural love of the pa- 
 rents. The incapacity of the child, as contrasted with 
 the superiority of the father, imposes the duty of obe- 
 dience on the one, and that of direction on the other. 
 Gifted with the faculty of speech, whereby to commu- 
 nicate their thoughts amongst each other, the whole 
 race of mankind are drawn by this natural impulse to 
 associate together. From such an association they im- 
 mediately perceive their increased means through com- 
 bination in pursuits. Such combination can however, 
 have no existence without personal rule, or ascertained 
 law, directing the common aims and actions of the 
 whole body to the same ends. Neither can such combination 
 be held together for any the least permanent purpose without 
 greater security than each individual can assure to him- 
 self by his own unaided strength against the violence 
 arising from human passions, and the mischiefs arising 
 from human errors. As in the case of a family, so in 
 the more enlarged circle of human society, in the bond 
 of which mankind are equally by nature held, the differ- 
 ences in the intellectual power necessarily lead to the con- 
 trolling influence and authority of such as are most highly 
 endowed. Hence the directing and governing and controll- 
 ing power of one, or of a portion, and the dominion of 
 some fixed regulations, over a body of men held together 
 by a greater or less strength of union. Government must 
 thus be perceived to be co-existent with the very being 
 of man : and we know of no tribe or race so entirely
 
 28 
 
 OF THE ORIGIN OF POLITICAL GOVERNMENT, 
 
 degraded from human attributes, as to be altogether 
 dissolved from every obligation to political authority. 
 
 In the progress of human affairs governments of al- 
 most every conceivable quality — over every variety of 
 people — and of every territorial extent have existed 
 in the world; and we have before our attention the 
 histories of a thousand nations, from which we mav draw 
 instruction as to the comparative success, or the inherent 
 merits, of the one form of government over another. The 
 records of these various plans of power all disclose ex- 
 cellencies as well as defects. Every one of them' fall far 
 short of absolute perfection. Relieving ourselves from 
 the copious controversies, and the laboured reasonings 
 which many ages of disquisition on topics so interesting to 
 every civilized nation has engendered, let us proceed to 
 pass in review before us some of those positions which the 
 ablest of political Philosophers have established as settled 
 truths and principles, applicable to the consideration 
 of every system of dominion.
 
 SECTION III. 
 
 Of the objects of Political Government. 
 
 The just object of government can only be that of 
 the happiness of the people— and it might he said, gene- 
 rally, that was the best form of government which best 
 provided for their happiness. But in what consists the 
 happiness of a whole embodied People ? That of an 
 individual greatly depends on circumstances having no 
 other than peculiar and personal influence — his taste, his 
 habits, his temper, his wisdom, his virtue, and so on. 
 But, to form an idea of the well-being of a whole com- 
 munity, we must conceive some notion of more universal 
 and permanent benefits— indiscriminately to be partici- 
 pated in by all. Let us fix it by adopting as a maxim 
 (as it appears to me we safely may) that the happiness of 
 a people consists in the perfect enjoyment of private 
 rig/its and acquisitions, and personal security from wrong. 
 These, then, are the main and final objects of good 
 government. 
 
 Now, it is with a view to protection of all in their 
 rights and acquisitions, and in their personal security, 
 that, as well every provision to guard against foreign 
 aggression, as all public internal laws, will, upon tracing 
 objects to their principles, be found to be directed. It 
 is the first practical application of the authority of a go- 
 vernment, which is founded on a system or plan, to appoint 
 the Ministers and Commanders for maintaining the inde- 
 pendent strength of the country, and Magistrates with 
 sufficient powers to enforce those public laws. These 
 are the duties to which all such magistrates and func- 
 tionaries of every grade and quality are pledged ; and it
 
 30 *>F THE OBJECTS OF POLITICAL GOVERNMENT. 
 
 is in consideration of the just performance of those 
 duties — so directed to these final objects of a well 
 constituted government— that the emoluments and the 
 honors of the magistracy are conferred. Thus we may 
 gain an intelligent view of the whole scope and aim 
 of political authority : for we must acknowledge that such 
 is the best government which best ensures the happiness 
 of the people ; we can agree in the conception of what 
 constitutes national happiness— namely, the perfect enjoy- 
 ment of property, and security from personal wrong — and 
 we are prepared to understand whence these sources and 
 constituents of national happiness are supplied and upheld, 
 namely, from the just performance of the assigned duties 
 of rulers and their officers. The prosperity and strength 
 of a nation does but little depend on a fertile soil, or the 
 bounties of nature — inasmuch as the history of the world 
 has proved to us that the most fruitful parts of the earth 
 have often become deserts through the foreign invasions 
 they have continually invited, or through internal decays ; 
 while great nations have flourished in those parts to which 
 nature has denied almost every thing. But we must look 
 for strength, and wealth, and internal peace, in those na- 
 tions, where a settled government, and just, equal, and 
 well administered laws have place, and in which every 
 citizen is ready in his vocation to fulfil his duty to the 
 State. 
 
 Observe, therefore, that supreme rulers, and all who bear 
 authority under them, have but one just origin, and should 
 have but one just object — namely, the good of the people. 
 And this, indeed, is so evident a truth, that I might have 
 spared to state it, did not the history of this country and 
 of the surrounding Asiatic nations develope little else but 
 one long continued violation of that plain maxim. It is 
 fit that the people of India should know, and reflect on the 
 evil, that the labour of multitudes in these countries has
 
 OF THE OBJECTS. Or POLITICAL GOVERNMENT. 3]^ 
 
 been for ages expended in the supporting the pageantry, 
 the idle indigencies, and the mischievous vices of such 
 rulers, and their families and their favourites, whose only 
 arts of government have been how best to secure the fruits 
 of their people's toil for their oivn private purposes. 
 Monarchs who thus act, and those who would uphold them 
 in their system of dominion, can never have reason or jus- 
 tice on their side ; unless there be reason in supposing 
 governments to be established for the aggrandizement of 
 one individual, or of one family, or one set of men, and 
 not for the safety and welfare of all. But it behoves those 
 who would think justly of the quality of any system of 
 government, to inquire if there be any who, out of the 
 labour of the people, appropriate wealth which has never 
 been earned by their own or their ancestor's exertions, and 
 receive it for the purpose of maintaining the magnificence 
 of royalty, and the rank and honors of magistracy, with- 
 out any corresponding duties whatever assigned, or ade- 
 quately performed for the benefit of that country which 
 supports them. If such there be, it will be well to consider 
 them as leeches of the Common-wealth, who drain its 
 blood but for waste. None can less deserve to be members 
 of it than 6uch as, having no concern whatever for the 
 public, seek from the public toil to gratify but tlieir own 
 private interests. The world unwillingly contributes to the 
 maintenance of men so utterly empty of desert.
 
 SECTION IV. 
 
 Of the necessity of a settled Plan of Power — or a 
 
 Constitution. 
 
 It is next to be shewn that it is of the very essence of 
 Political Government that its plan or scheme of power — 
 or what the English term the constitution of government 
 — should be fixed ; and that its method of exercise ^should 
 be by the course of laws. Without this there can be no 
 certainty of property, or security of person ; which we 
 have seen to be only purposes of government. Nor in- 
 deed, can property or personal safety be said to exist at 
 all, when the power to which we must necessarily submit is 
 constantly liable to change, and when the exercise of uncon- 
 trollable authority is restrained by no rules. It is an eternal 
 truth that every man is by nature disposed to abuse that 
 power which depends solely on his will, and that his abuse of 
 it will extend up to very checks he may feel to be imposed 
 against such abuse. 
 
 But, it may be said, have there not been great states — 
 powerful in relation to their neighbours — peaceful and pros- 
 perous in themselves — who have been governed by the ab- 
 solute authority of even one man ? And do we not know of 
 such states thus governed even at this day ? This is a point 
 I may do well to explain ; for it will be found, nevertheless, 
 that the maxims I have laid down are just. 
 
 It is true that great nations have arisen, and for a while 
 have flourished, or appeared so to do, under no other rule of 
 government than what depended on the arbitrary will of 
 one man. But observe — first, that those nations which 
 have been most famous in history for the power they have 
 attained under one, or some few successive leaders, have
 
 OF THE NECESSITY OF A SETTLED PLAN OF TOWER, 33 
 
 been also the most conspicuous for their oppression of their 
 conquered subjects — and among such , unhappy people, 
 who have thus been reduced to hold their lives and their 
 property at the mere discretion of their oppressors, Poli- 
 tical Government, in its true sense of a fit exercise 
 of power towards the just object of the public happi- 
 ness, cannot be said to exist. Moreover, the original 
 followers or subjects over whom such absolute monarchs 
 have gained and put in force a pure arbitrary control, 
 are far from the enjoying internal peace or security, even 
 among themselves : inasmuch as it will be found that all the 
 wealth and luxuries of life fall to the share of the monarch 
 himself and of his favorites; who, while they devour those 
 who are beneath them, tremble daily at the evils with which 
 their superior may in a moment visit them ; and inasmuch 
 as the infernal strength of the people, as an independent na- 
 tion so governed, arises from the promptitude with which 
 every individual sacrifices each wish and pleasure, and sub- 
 mits all his very faculties to the ordering of his prince. 
 And, secondly, observe— that power of this arbitrary nature 
 — a scourge to surrounding nations, and the unfailing source 
 of much misery, and more discontent, to those subjected to 
 it— can never last long. The struggles of ambitious men, 
 which no regular laws restrain, and the vengeance of the 
 oppressed, which soon or late becomes too strong for the 
 fear of any consequences, unite to produce internal convul- 
 sions thvf ughout the state, and rebellions also from with- 
 out. The country soon becomes an ever-changing scene 
 of wrong ; and usually, in the end, surrenders itself either 
 to a better government or to a more powerful people. 
 
 Such is the fate, and such the inevitable result, of arbi- 
 trary power, direr' ed by no rule, and exercised purely in 
 subserviency to tlie human passions. But it must be allow- 
 ed that the form or quality of government, known by the 
 term of absolute monarchy, has not always exhibited the.-e
 
 34 °P THE NECESSITY OF A SETTLED PLAN OF POWER. 
 
 characteristics. It has sometimes happened that the union 
 of mental talent, and a benevolent disposition towards 
 mankind, has combined to establish fiimly, and to govern 
 prosperously, an extensive and powerful State. 1 here have 
 been also instances in which under the same supreme arbi- 
 trary authority of one man, such established states have 
 been happily ruled, although much of that talent, and even of 
 that disposition, has been wanting. But in these cases, it 
 "will be found, upon scrupulous examination, that one of 
 these two solutions offer. Either the qualify of the monarch 
 is such that the course of his government is as surely di- 
 rected towards the well-being of the state and the hajppiness 
 of his people, as if it was directed by fixed laws — a rare 
 occurrence, and so rare that it can scarce be quoted except 
 from fabulous story — or that such absolute monarch is con- 
 tent to govern by fixed laws already settled, or newly enact- 
 ed by such an appointed course as may best ensure their 
 wisdom and efficiency. In fact, it is in proportion as great 
 and good princes are observed to resign the exercise of pow- 
 er according to the dictates of the human will, and to sub- 
 mit to those checks upon its abuse which either fixed laws 
 themselves impose, or prudent and respected counsellors ad- 
 minister, that their subjects can be considered as enjoying 
 the blessings of political government. 
 
 It may be admitted, therefore, that absolute monarchies 
 may exist, without implying the absence or utter dissolution 
 of any systematic plan of government whatever — although, 
 if such a course of exercising power was in reality followed 
 out in 'practice, so as to exhibit in all acts of authority 
 nothing more than the measures suggested by the pure arbi- 
 trary and unchecked will of one or more individuals, such 
 an exercise of power would necessarily end in confounding 
 all notions of right and wrong, apd in a violation of all the 
 essential qualities of political government. And, indeed, 
 confined as the use of absolute power really is (with such 
 exceptions I shall hereafter notice) in practice, by such re-
 
 OF THE NECESSITY OF A SETTLED PLAN OF POWEE. 35 
 
 strain ts as laws and a due respect to the sense of the 
 community imposes, that is a form of government which is 
 not altogether without some advantages. For it must be 
 confessed that it is a merit in any scheme of government 
 that it should be beet calculated to ensure promptness in the 
 resolving upon measures, and vigour in working them out — 
 a merit which is conspicuous in governments under absolute 
 monarchs. So powerful are these considerations, that some 
 philosophers, not sufficiently weighing the true principles of 
 government, and in what consists that public happiness 
 which depends on those principles, have been led to affirm, 
 that no scheme of government can so thoroughly accomplish 
 the good of a people, and uphold their national strength, as 
 the absolute will of a wise, and virtuous, and benevolent 
 Prince. 
 
 Rut, even if this could be granted, and if we could 
 suppose that under the form of absolute monarchy such in- 
 stances of an union of great and good faculties were by no 
 means rare — if we could suppose that the appetite for an 
 undue share of the enjoyments of life in such princes and their 
 obedient ministers would submit to the dictates of reason 
 and of justice, or if we could hope that such would be satiat- 
 ed with wealth and the power by which it was to be gained 
 — yet this form of government must ever manifest counter- 
 vailing defects. There never could be any certainty as to 
 the permanence of these dispositions, either in such riders 
 themselves, or in their successors. The established method, 
 of governing might at any moment be changed. The laws 
 themselves have existence and operation frail as the human 
 breath. Those who shall consult the page of history wil* 
 read of many great nations rising to eminence under the 
 guidance of some powerful mind, and prospering for a time 
 — but for a time only. A great conqueror collects an im- 
 mense concourse under his banners, who over run wide 
 countries, and establish wealthy empires, and such empires
 
 35 OF THE NECESSITY OF A SETTLED PLAN OF POWEK. 
 
 are perhaps well governed for a season. But as soon as the 
 founder is no more, it usually has happened that his govern- 
 ment has fallen with him. There being no settled plan of 
 power, no fixed rule for the guidance of his successors — 
 such governuients are not calculated to stand the test of 
 time; but are necessar ly subject to accidents, bringing in 
 their train confusion, anarchy, and civil wars. 
 
 And in these respects there is no difference whether a 
 nation be reduced to subjection to the will of one arbitrary 
 monarch, or to the absolute power of many or of few who 
 shall wield the full authorities of the state. For it is very 
 possible that a large delegated assembly, or that a few 
 who may have been born to, or have attained, supreme 
 dominion in a state, may resolve to govern by no regulated 
 plan, and may disregard all laws made for the protection of 
 property or of the person. Whether they will govern with- 
 out law, or whether the people shall find a sure refuge 
 aqainst wrong, and a plain guidance in their mutual affairs 
 with each other, in their laws and the administration of them, 
 must depend on whether such a scheme or plan for the exer- 
 cise of the power of the state exists, as may more or less 
 prevent the gratification of the mere will — for, in the ab- 
 sence of any such checks, human nature will impel the 
 possessors of power, whether many or few, to accumulate 
 at the expence of those who cannot resist them an undue 
 share of the enjoyments of life, until all the just ends of 
 political government are openly abandoned. 
 
 Thus, under whatever form or course of government a na- 
 tion may be ruled, we must look to find some fixed systematic 
 scheme or plan for the conduct of it, and to see that this 
 scheme itself, and the method of exercising authority under 
 it, should be founded on laws — before we can agree that the 
 essential objects of political government are arrived at.
 
 SECTION V. 
 
 Of the Marks and Characteristics of a well- constituted 
 Government. First ; attention due to the Habits, 
 Feelings, and Manners of the People. 
 
 Contemplating, then, political government as the means 
 to a certain end— as a human device, through a certain 
 settled scheme and through a course of prescribed laws, 
 for accomplishing the social happiness of a people— let 
 us next examine some of those marks, or characteristics, hy 
 which we may, perhaps, hest judge of its being adapted to 
 its object. 
 
 The history of the world — exemplifying the progress of 
 man in obeying the dictates of his nature, by first congregating 
 into rude societies scarce held together by force of any law 
 or compact, and afterwards by extending their social unions 
 into populous nations, occupying fixed habitations — is a his- 
 tory in great measure of habits, feelings, and manners among 
 the human race. These habits, feelings, and manners have 
 grown up, not according to any st:t of rules and principles 
 laid down according to reason and upon deliberation, but by 
 force of mere circumstances and accident. Every age and 
 nation has its peculiar code of morals and of manners ; and 
 the qualities of government are more dependant on them, 
 than they on the force of authority or laws. Jt requires but 
 a little reflection to perceive such to be the necessary result 
 of the progress of mankind from rude barbarism, or savage 
 life, to civilization ; and we shall presently advert to some 
 of these accidental and external circumstances. But it is a 
 well known saying, that habit is a second nature — and 
 habits, therefore, however they may have arisen, will, like
 
 3g CHARACTERISTICS OF A WELL-CONSTITUTED GOVERNMENT. 
 
 the propensities of human nature itself, imperatively in- 
 fluence all plans and contrivances by which men seek to 
 accomplish that which they conceive most to their interest 
 and well being ; and, amongst others, every system which 
 may have been gradually built up of political government. 
 
 But, if such systems of government have thus become con- 
 nected with habits, and the quality of these habits has de- 
 pended on accidental circumstances, it must follow that such 
 systems or modes of government must be as various as the 
 several nations who live under any settled rules of power. It 
 must also follow that after these habits have grown up, and 
 are interwoven as it were, and identified, with the feelings, 
 or even the prejudices, of a people, and thus become a 
 second nature, any violation of them would be a counterac- 
 tion of nature itself, and a cause of distress and discontent. 
 As, therefore, we see that diversities of government must 
 arise, and the modes of rule must have become consonant 
 to the various qualities, and peculiarities of feeling, of vari- 
 ous people — so it is a just principle of government that its 
 scheme and course of operation should continue to res- 
 pect such habits as are found to prevail. It must be recol- 
 lected that it was not in the maturity, but in the infancy, of 
 civilization that governments took their rise ; and that, how- 
 ever competent through power, through natural wisdom, 
 through studious comparison of numerous political systems 
 and laws, and through sagacious reflection on their scope and 
 tendency, any rulers, or the ministers of such rulers, may in 
 these later times have become to frame a just plan of power 
 for the government of any given nation — such competency 
 must necessarily have been attained long after certain cus- 
 toms and modes of life, certain common and confirmed opi- 
 nions, and certain dispositions of the mind and feelings have 
 taken too deep a root to be contended against without gene- 
 ral mischief.
 
 CHARACTERISTICS OF A WELL-CONSTITUTED GOVERNMENT. 39 
 
 For this reason it is a commended saying of an ancient 
 lawgiver, who framed a plan of government for the most 
 enlightened nation of old times, that "his laws were not, 
 " indeed, the best; but they were the best which that peo- 
 " pie were capable of receiving." For this reason we may 
 judge that caution to beat once benevolent and wise which 
 restrains the Supreme Government of England, in the 
 plenitude of its power, from imposing throughout their new- 
 ly acquired Indian Empire the same scheme of political go- 
 vernment, and the same fundamental laws, (however good in 
 themselves, and however valued) as those which have arisen 
 out of, and become adapted to, the condition of another 
 class of our fellow-subjects. It will be sufficient that I 
 should notice that implicit obedience to the personal dicta- 
 tion required by those in authority, and as willingly yielded 
 by all others, which throughout many ages has been habi- 
 tual to the natives of these countries —that gpn^ral distaste 
 and inaptitude to political discussion and legislation — I have 
 but to allude to their zealous attachment, to the institution 
 and rules of Castes, to the customs of Descent and Division 
 of property, and of Marriage, to satisfy my Native readers 
 that a total subversion of such rules and customs, and an en- 
 deavour to square the feelings and domestic habits of one 
 people with the laws made for anoth-r, would be as gieat a 
 tyranny and violation, as the forcible transfer of their pos- 
 sessions without reason, and without right. For habits and 
 customs, which do not originate in laws, ought to be amend- 
 ed by the introduction of other habits and customs: and it 
 is an ill policy to attempt to change them by Laws.
 
 SECTION VI. 
 
 The sime subject continued. Second; Changes should 
 
 not be sudden. 
 
 I do no more than add the necessary consequence of the 
 principle I am discussing, when I affirm the political maxim 
 that all innovations in government should be gradual ; and 
 rather follow, than aim at guiding, the sense of the people. 
 We know that change is a law of nature : it is not more ex- 
 hibited in ail material things around us, than in the mind and 
 spirit of mankind, A blind or prejudiced adherence to ar- 
 rangements once made, but which can have had no other 
 origin than the exercise of the human intellect, is, not only 
 to surrender the superior powers of an understanding neces- 
 sarily improved by the force of experience, but i3 in truth a 
 contest against necessity. Such contests, however, though 
 vain as regards the issue, may have their effect in prolong- 
 ing the endurance of evil. Modes and systems of govern- 
 ment must change ; and, like all other prospects in human 
 affairs, they fitly form the subject of human consideration. 
 
 But, the mass of mankind are doomed to toil for the neces- 
 sities and comforts of life, and can have li'tle leisure to study 
 the nature or value of political and legislative change. They 
 are more prone to pursue with avidity, and to enjoy in com- 
 placency, the objects of their dispositions and habits, 
 than to submit such feelings to the reason of any others. 
 Opposition to these fixed propensities can, when the 
 occasion of it is not seen and estimated, serve but to 
 produce pain and anxiety of mind. Conformity with order 
 and the law is the bond of peace and the test of the people's 
 prosperity — but cheerful obedience to authority can only be
 
 CHANGES SHOULD NOT BE SUDDEN. 4^ 
 
 looked for from those whose passions are calm. Kow, then, 
 since political changes must and ought tv be contemplated, 
 are such changes best to he effected ? By such only who, 
 having sagacity to perceive what measures may be profita- 
 ble, and maturely reflecting on their tendency and conse- 
 quences, will watch also the spirit of the age; and jvill be 
 cautious that new laws, if they do not altogether conspire 
 with that .spirit, shall at least not counteract it — by those 
 who shall ever he mindful that reverence for the law is the 
 only stable foundation of government. 
 
 It deserves to he considered that no change is made 
 without inconvenience, and that there is certain advantage 
 in constancy and stability. There may be evil in settled or 
 hereditary institutions — but, if they he slight, they should 
 rather he endured than corrected at the imminent risk of 
 greater mischiefs. For every alteration of fundamental 
 laws tends to subvert that reverence for authority by which 
 the force of law is sustained. And it may be that ancient 
 laws which are good are preferable to novelties which are 
 belter. So that the fabiic of government should be always 
 touched with a fearful and trembling hand, and its very 
 TUSt should be respected. It is not change itself, but sud- 
 denness and violence in change, which at once excites the 
 disgust of the multitude, and loosens the ties which bind 
 them in obedience : and he that shall investigate the pro- 
 gress of civil dissension wi41 find as many to have arisen 
 from sudden violation of prejudices, and even caprices, as 
 from actual oppressions. Hut, when the unthinking multi- 
 tude shall overthrow the frame of government and trample 
 on its laws, we may be assured that they will govern rather 
 in the fury of passion than in thoughtfulness of wisdom. 
 In t he violence of fheir innovations they will probably, 
 indeed, conform to the temper of the times ; but their 
 measures will always, and the rather sometimes for that 
 very reason, offend against the true principles of govero-
 
 42 
 
 CHANGES SHOULD NOT BE SUDDEN. 
 
 ment. In all circumstances of a nation, therefore, we may 
 justly fear the sudden introduction of political change. 
 In all innovations (it has been wisely and aptly said) we 
 should imitate Time. For Time, though the greatest of all 
 innovators, so skilfully insinuates change, as to deceive our 
 very senses.
 
 SECTION VII. 
 
 The same subject continued. Third ; the External and 
 
 Natural condition of a Country, and of its 
 
 Inhabitants, to be observed. 
 
 Among those accidental circumstances which cannot fail 
 to impress on the inhabitants of various countries varying 
 qualities of feeling, habit, manner, and intercourse, we must 
 chiefly reckon the external or natural condition of each such 
 country — and it becomes a mark of the just observance of 
 the true principles of government, that its plan of power 
 and the spirit of its laws should have reference to that 
 external or natural condition. It is impossible to doubt 
 that the difference of climate, or temperature of the air, 
 according to the position of each country on the globo, 
 occasions a difference in the corporeal strength, and power 
 of exertion, and consequently in the sensibilities, and even 
 in the intellectual faculties, of mankind. Moreover, the 
 great dissimilarity in the soil and situation of different coun- 
 tries produces a corresponding variety of pursuits. Ft 
 would lead me into a wide field of curious observation, and 
 perhaps of controversy, were I to examine into all the 
 effects of such causes as these. We must be content with 
 noticing what are most obvious. 
 
 It must be the natural result of that deficiency of 
 strength and power of exertion, that love of quietness and 
 repose, and that delicacy or tenderness of feeling, 
 which a great comparative warmth in the climate 
 begets — that the people living under it should become 
 averse to change, that they should be incompetent to 
 the heats and conflicts of political discussion, and that they
 
 ; 14 CONDITION OF A COUNTRY TO BE OBSERVED, 
 
 should be roused with painfullness, and collected together 
 with difficulty, for the duty of withstanding agression. In 
 colder countries, on the contrary, the condition of the body 
 and animal spirits urges to incessant activity and contempt 
 of danger. If we survey the diversities in the surface of 
 various countries, we find that the situation of some, as 
 being islands, or abounding in wide rivers, impels the in- 
 habitants to the arts of commerce, and to a stretch of do- 
 minion over distant colonies. The quality of others, 
 as composed of fertile and separated plains, leads to a 
 crowded population and a facility of intercourse. Over 
 barren deserts tribes wander in the lawless independence 
 of savage life — throughout the fastnesses of a mountainous 
 district are scantily dispersed a few families, who know little 
 of one another, and scarce any thing at all of the rest of 
 mankind. 
 
 Here, therefore, we perceive general and conspicuous 
 effects produced by these external circumstances I speak of, 
 which as they have contributed to form the peculiar charac- 
 ters of the various nations of the earth, so must they have 
 influenced the modifications of their several governments, 
 and so must they ever dictate its principles and fundamen- 
 tal laws. In some countries the people are naturally more 
 prone to implicit obedience to constituted authority, and 
 adhere with greater stedfastness to the institutions and cus- 
 toms of their ancestors. Among them we may expect will 
 prevail a greater discretion reposed in personal authority, 
 and at the same time a greater permanence and simplicity 
 in their laws. The inhabiiants of another clime are less 
 easily controlled, more inquisitive and more eager in all 
 their interests, and more bold in their pursuit of them. 
 Among them, it is observed that (should not counteracting 
 causes prevent it) a system of government will be aimed 
 at admitting a greater extent of popular management, 
 and of means for the expression of the public sentiments
 
 CONDITION OF A COUNTRY TO BE OBSERVED. 
 
 45 
 
 The openness and fertility of one country will be the per- 
 petual source of attraction to fierce invaders, and preclude 
 any long term of national independence — the barren rugged- 
 ness of another will repel the avidity for conquest. The 
 small extent and the close population of some states will 
 suggest the greater union of councils, and keep down (he 
 accumulation of laws — the wide expanse, the slenderly 
 connected portions, or the vast commerce, of other states 
 produce necessarily a proportionate delegation of authority, 
 and complexity in the rules of property. The mi 
 gets puzzled in the endeavour to trace the bearings of all 
 these diversities on political government. It has ac- 
 
 complished, however, with great success in the 
 writings of some eminent philosophers; and in a manner 
 as instructive as interesting to the studious inquirer. 
 But these are details quite bey-nd the scope of a discourse 
 so comprehensive as this ; which must confine itself to 
 the extraction of general maxims and positions. It. must 
 be sufficient if we can make it manifest, how vain must be 
 any idea that the fancied perfection of any particular system 
 of government must recommend it to the universal adoption 
 of all nations, however circumstanced. Let us rather feel 
 assured that the natural causes of national character are 
 altogether above any human sway ; for the empire of the 
 elements is stronger than many generations of lawgivers.
 
 SECTION VIII. 
 
 The same subject continued. Fourth ; of the Share which 
 
 the People should have in the Administration 
 
 of the Government. 
 
 But the most important mark of the true principles of 
 government, in the consideration of such as concern them- 
 selves practically in the just observance of them, is — that 
 the bulk of the people should have some share in the 
 administration of that government which the whole com- 
 munity is bound to obey. 
 
 Let us inquire what it is to have a share in the govern- 
 ment. A man may be said to have a share in the polifical 
 government of his country, either when he assists, or has a 
 voice in, the supreme ordaining of the larvs of the state, 
 under which its scheme subsists, and the administration of 
 all its powers is conducted— or when he contributes person- 
 ally to the actual administration of those powers, under the 
 control of such supreme authority. Let it be observed, 
 here, that I speak of a political government subsisting 
 under some regulated scheme or plan of power, and govern- 
 ing by and under laws — and I speak of those who personally 
 contribute to its administration according to such constitut- 
 ed scheme, and under the guidance of such laws. A mo- 
 narch, or an united band of men, governing a people with- 
 out any settled scheme, independently of any rules of law, 
 and under no check, cannot be said properly to constitute any 
 political government whatever. If he, or they, should govern, 
 merely by the impulse of their own will and passions, how 
 are they otherwise than in a state of nature ? For a state of 
 nature is that in which people act purely according to their
 
 SHARE OF THE PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT. 47 
 
 own temporary inclinations, and their own notions of self- 
 interest. So neither can he who performs the functions 
 assigned him in a state, according to the mere will of a mo- 
 narch or governing body, he properly said to have any .share 
 in political government. He is a mere tool in the hands 
 of others. He cannot have a share in that which has no 
 substantial existence. He possesses no political rights of 
 any kind. He is but the medium through whom anuther 
 party acts— and acts as if in a state of nature. 
 
 Some such a share in the political government of a 
 country as I have above defined a portion of the people must 
 enjoy under every form or scheme of government which is 
 based on fundamental laws, and which aims at governing 
 by a course of general laws, and not by mere arbitrary and 
 personal discretion. The share enjoyed may be very unim- 
 portant, and the portion of the people possessing such share 
 may be very small. But, still, so long as these -fundame.n'- 1 
 laws on which the scheme of government is constituted has 
 force,and the general rules of laws according to which it is to 
 be administered are observed, no man can have an unli- 
 mited power to govern by his own will. The wishes and 
 interests of others, as protected by the laws, must be res- 
 pected as well as his own, in the administration of the 
 government. There must be one or more persons who 
 has independent authority to advise at least, if they do 
 not actually partake in the exercise of the supreme po*ver ; 
 there must be several to whom the administration of the 
 affairs of government is intrusted, who are to be guided in 
 the performance of their duties by the laws only, and not 
 by any individual's arbitrary direction, and who are respon- 
 sible only to the control of that supreme authority which is 
 shared in some degree by a portion of the people, and not 
 to the sole authority of one man. \\ hen all participation 
 and influence in the supreme governing powers of the 
 state are' denied to any portion of the people, and all means 
 of administering the laws independently of arbitrary dicta-
 
 4$ SHARE OP THE PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT. 
 
 tion Rre destroyer], the foundations of regular political 
 government are torn up. 
 
 When, however, that share in the exercise of the supreme 
 power is very limited, and when it is extended, moreover, 
 to hut a small portion of the people, such a scheme of 
 political government can hy no means heconsidered as found- 
 ed on jnst principles. There is no security whatever that 
 the fundamental laws on which it is based will long 
 subsist — and still less that justice will long continue to 
 be administered according to any settled rules of laws by 
 such as exercise offices in the state. And for this reason^ 
 — because every man (as has been observed before) is im- 
 pelled hy his very nature to seek the gratification of his own 
 private interests, and to exert all hi-i power in administering 
 to his own inclinations, rather than to labour for the general 
 good of a community. And, as there is no limit to his desire 
 to attain what he considers the pleasures and enjoyments of 
 life, so neither will-tfhere beany limit to his consequent efforts 
 at engrossing all the power he can, as the means of enabling 
 him to appropriate to himself as large a proportion of them 
 as possiMe. With this view he will always feel disposed 
 to disregard laws of every quality which he is not compelled 
 to obey. And. thus, when one single man, or a very few in- 
 dividuals, shall have once obtained the supreme governing 
 authority, and only a small number of the people have a 
 very limited share in influencing or guiding the measures 
 of the state, those who govern will be almost sure to abuse 
 their power. They will be engaged in a continual struggle to 
 abolish, or to abandon, all those settled rules and forms 
 according to which the government is to be conducted. 
 They will ever be more or less labouring to overawe, or to 
 annihilate, the suggestions of others. They will hardly 
 allow any who are under them to exercise the offices of the 
 stale according to any equal rules of law, but only as their 
 own tools, subject to their own absolute control. The
 
 SHAKE OF THE PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT. 49 
 
 tendency of such a struggle is to destroy political govern- 
 ment, and reduce society again to a state pf nature, in which 
 the strongest govern, and seize to themselves whatever 
 they desire. 
 
 It must, then, be obvious that, in considering the question 
 how far just, principles characterize any particular form of 
 government, we have not merely to enquire whether one 
 single person possesses the whole power, or whether a few 
 persons possess it, or whether even a larger number of indi- 
 viduals possess it. But the question is, whether so large 
 a number share in the supreme power, and have in their 
 various gradations a share in executing the duties of office, 
 as to product an effectual check on the inclinations of one 
 portion of the people to pursue their own interests at the 
 expence of the rest. A few men, or even a large number, 
 may combine to govern for themselves alone ; and history 
 has abundantly shewn that they often will do so. But when 
 the sharers are very numerous, such a combination becomes 
 more difficult. The interests of many being at stake, it 
 becomes the less likely that they can all be equally gratified 
 through the oppressions and wrongs clone to the body of the 
 people who have no share in the government. The interests 
 of one portion of the governing body become a check and 
 control upon the exorbitant desires of the other. The num. 
 ber is increased of those who love their country and respect 
 its laws, and who act from such motives. And if, besides 
 this, the system of government be such as to admit of any 
 methods by which the sentiments and feelings of the 
 Public at large can be made known — so that their 
 opinions may influence, although they cannot actually 
 direct the measures and councils of those who govern — the 
 chances become the greater that these measures will be di- 
 rected to the common good of the nation. Moreover, when 
 the various offices of the state are distributed widely among 
 the people, and all the members of the community, having
 
 50 SHARE OF THE PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT. 
 
 free scope for their industry and talents, are admissible to 
 those offices, according to the gradations to which they at- 
 tain in society and the qualifications they possess, there is 
 the less probability of their becoming the mere instruments 
 and tools for performing the will of others, rather than their 
 just duties according to the established laws. 
 
 It follows from this that the merit and perfection of any 
 plan of political government ought to be judged of according 
 as it admits the largest number of the people to have such a 
 share in its administration, as they are qualified to exercise. 
 And no system of political government can be completely 
 well constituted, unless it shall admit of the bulk of the 
 people to some such share. For, let the number be as large 
 as it may of (hose who govern, if there be any portion what- 
 ever of the people of a nation who have not the slightest 
 power or influence in the state, nor the capacity of attaining 
 to any ; but are bound to submit at once, without any means 
 of resistance or even of remonstrance to the measures of 
 others — that portion will be certainly wronged in some de- 
 gree. For the governing body will govern for their own 
 interests generally, without regard to the interests of this 
 portion of the people. The governing body will be the 
 masters — attending in the name to their own advantages and 
 enjoyments— the others will be either as slaves or strangers 
 in the land. 
 
 It is manifest, however, that each member of a whole 
 community cannot act for himself, either in the framing and 
 ordering the laws of his country, or in contributing to the 
 administration of them. Nay— it is only a very few indeed, 
 compared with the whole number of a people, who can exer- 
 cise the most limited functions of the supreme power, or who 
 can be called on to fill the any of the various offices of the 
 state. The mass of the people must be destined to pursue 
 their several private avocations in life, and to yield obedi-
 
 SHARE OF THE PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT. §\ 
 
 ence to the few who govern, whether such few do indeed 
 govern according to the laws, or according only to their own 
 will. All efforts by the body of the people to govern for 
 themselves, would — even in the least populous of nil nations — - 
 lead to confusion and the struggle of factions ; and, in, the 
 end, to the mastery of one, or of some small united 
 body. And thus it would appear that, so far from the bulk 
 of the people, by the share that it was possible they could 
 attain to in the political government of their country, 
 having the means of checking the natural impulse in the 
 few who govern to destroy the scheme of government, and 
 to disregard the laws — a small portion of the people must 
 necessarily have the whole power ; they will certainly strive 
 to abuse it ; the rest of the community will certainly be more 
 or less wronged : and they will be treated either as slaves or 
 strangers in the land. Hence it might be concluded that 
 under no scheme of government can it be properly a princi- 
 ple that the bulk of the people should have some appropriate 
 share in its administration. 
 
 The world may perhaps be still young— and the pro- 
 gress of civilization has, it may be hoped, left mankind as 
 yet far short of that maturity in understanding, and in social 
 happiness, which may be destined for our race. But, alas! 
 the history of nations has hitherto afforded few examples of 
 a frame of government likely to last; or which has not, in 
 the mean3 supplied of disregard to the common interests, 
 carried in their very constitution the seeds of decay and 
 death. If this, indeed, was the law of human nature, 
 lamentable would be the condition of mankind. Impelled by 
 human feelings and necessities to unite in societies— uphold- 
 ing that social union by force only of political government — 
 establishing schemes of government which must become, as 
 it were, self-acting engines of oppression — the race of man 
 would appear to have been created as the sport of demons ; 
 and the history of nations would be but the history of alter- 
 nations in human suffering.
 
 SECTION IX. 
 
 The same subject continued. Fourth; of the Share o) 
 
 the People in the government exercised by a System 
 
 of Representation. 
 
 We must not, however, pronounce all idea of correct prin- 
 ciples, and of permanency, in the constitutions of political 
 government to be a mere fanciful illusion. There have been 
 some approaches towards perfection, An investigation into 
 the qualities of those national governments whose merits 
 have been most conspicuous will disclose the true spring 
 and force of such government to consist in its representative 
 faculty. The bulk of the people cannot, indeed, engage 
 in the actual administration of the affairs of the state, or in 
 the duties of office. But they can exercise their share in 
 the government through the medium of others who shall 
 represent them. In this lies the virtue of political go- 
 vernment. It advances towards perfection, according as the 
 system devised for having the interests of the national com- 
 munity represented approaches perfection. And, in this view, 
 it is certainly one mark and characteristic of a well-con- 
 stituted government that its system provides for all ranks of 
 the people, according to their station in society or their 
 qualifications, the means of access to office. It is true that 
 but few can actually attain to office— yet if it be open to 
 all by their industry or their talents to attain the requisite 
 qualifications for office, and if no individual so qualified is 
 absolutely excluded from being selected by the constitut- 
 ed authorities, then do all ranks of the people to a certain 
 extent possess a share in the administration of the govern- 
 ment of their country. And this share, from the circum-
 
 8HARE OF THE PEOPLE BY REPRESENTATION. £Q 
 
 stance of the means of attaining office being so generally 
 diffused throughout the community, becomes in truth a share 
 according to the system of representation. For the highest 
 councellors of the state, and the highest magistrates, even 
 though they should hold their offices by hereditary right, 
 do not act according to their private will, but for the 
 sake and on behalf of the body of the people. And, although 
 these particular individuals who have themselves inherited 
 such offices and functions in the state cannot be said to 
 hold their offices through the express will of any particular 
 portion of the community, or to perform their duties in the 
 place, and as representatives, of any such particular portion — 
 yet, when this station itself so clothed with the privilege of 
 transmission by course of heirship, is attainable by all classes 
 according to certain merits and qualifications, we may justly 
 consider such hereditary magistrates as representing, and 
 exercising on behalf of the public, some share in the admi- 
 nistration which belongs to the people at large. More 
 plainly is this the case as regards offices to which function- 
 aries are appointed, either by the constituted authorities, or 
 by the express voice of the people themselves. 
 
 Such a share as this in the government of their country — 
 consisting in the means of access to all the honors and 
 offices of the state being afforded to the bulk of the people 
 — whereby the interests of the whole community are more 
 or less represented and protected, is a mark or characteristic 
 of most of the civilized governments of Europe. But, with 
 far the greater number of them, it is the only share in the 
 government possessed by the general community. A share 
 in the actual supreme controlling and legislative authority 
 of the state, exercised by means of representatives freely 
 and expressly appointed by a qualified portion of the people 
 themselves, is a characteristic of very few of such govern- 
 ments. It does not follow, indeed, that such countries are 
 ill-governed ; or that the true end and aim of all good go-
 
 54 SHARE IN THE GOVERNMENT BY REPRESENTATION. 
 
 vernment may not have been eminently accomplished in 
 such governments. Neither does it follow, even, that such 
 countries could be better governed by the adoption of a more 
 complete system of representative administration. For, as 
 has been shewn before, there are various other principles of 
 government, besides this of a share by representation, which 
 ought to be observed in adopting a scheme of political 
 government to its ends and objects. The habits of a people 
 have to be respected — sudden innovations in government 
 have to be avoided— and the condition and circumstances of 
 the people, and of the country, have to be regarded, from 
 whatever causes they have arisen. 
 
 But although, under the circumstances of some countries, 
 a more perfect form and scheme of political government by 
 representation may not be at once practicable, yet it is fitting 
 that this most important quality and principle of good go- 
 vernment should be at least thoroughly understood, so that 
 its application be kept in view as far as a due consideration 
 of the position of the people will allow. For the bulk 
 of the people m?y have the means of access to power, 
 yet if the selection to office is to depend on the mere 
 will of one man, or body of men, at the head of the state, 
 who govern altogether independently of the opinions or in- 
 fluence of the people, the parties selected for office will 
 rather be servants of the head of the state than of the bulk 
 of the people, and will do his bidding rather than their's, 
 And, even though such functionaries may be appointed by the 
 express voice of the people, yet if they be no longer afterwards 
 dependant on the voice of the people, they will be apt to 
 govern for themselves or for their other masters. The con- 
 stituted scheme for the government of the state, and the 
 public duties assigned for the protection and prosperity of 
 the people, rest not on a durable foundation. They are lia- 
 ble to change, and to disregard, according to the interests of 
 those who have the entire power of pursuing their own in-
 
 SHARE IN THE GOVERNMENT BY REPRESENTATION. 55 
 
 clinations. The system of government is imperfect, and as 
 a natural tendency to the rule of the arbitrary and tyrannical 
 few, aiming mainly to gratify their own unlimited desires, 
 over the submissive many who have neither influence nor 
 power to check them. There is wanting, therefore, something 
 more to render a representative faculty in the government 
 complete. There requires a system of representation which 
 is to have continual operation — a representative system 
 which is to have a controlling and a restraining influence as 
 a supreme authority — which is to aid, directly or indirectly, 
 in every measure of the state, and even in the preservation 
 and improvement of the very plan of power itself under 
 which the administration of government is conducted. 
 
 An absolutely perfect system of representation would 
 provide for supplying a fit number of the best qualified per- 
 sons to express the will, and to protect equally the interests, 
 of the whole body of the people. For if every law and 
 every act of the government, was in precise conformity with 
 the will of the whole body of the people, ii is certain no in- 
 justice could by possibility be done to any single person 
 throughout the nation ; since no man would will his own 
 injury, nor would even a majority of the people will any 
 thing which would be the gain of a few only, and a detri- 
 ment to the majority. And, if the equal interests of all 
 were aimed at, and such persons were appointed to govern 
 on behalf of all who were best qualified to judge of "hose 
 common interests, human wisdom could neither devise nor 
 desire any better scheme for the protection and advancement 
 of those interests. But such a system of represent at ion is 
 a mere conception, and practically impossible. It would be 
 utterly vain to seek for an unanimous desire or an unani- 
 mous opinion of even a small portion of the people upon any 
 political subject. If the opinion of the majority of the peo- 
 ple, or of any portion of the people could by possibility be 
 ascertained upon any political measures ; it is certain that
 
 50 SHARE IN THE GOVERNMENT BY REPRESENTATION. 
 
 but very few of such a majority are competent to form a 
 judgment of the- quality and tendency of such measures or 
 even to give their attention to them. It is manifest, there- 
 fore, that the will of the people, expressed under any system 
 of representation, can only extend to the mere election of 
 their representatives, and to the retention or change of 
 them, according as their general conduct and services may, 
 or may not, give satisfaction. # 
 
 But what is that mode of election which is best calculated 
 to ensure the services of those who are best qualified to 
 pursue, and to pursue honestly, the equal and true interests 
 of the whole body of the nation ? It would be vain to say 
 that a mere majority of the people could best decide on such 
 qualifications, and could be relied on for choosing such as 
 possessed them. Suppose the whole community divided into 
 so many sections, and each section should elect one or more 
 representatives by a majority of the members, each having 
 a single and equ^l vote. Then might, and probably would, 
 the least educated, the most incapable, the poorest and 
 most dependent on others (which constitute much the 
 largest proportion) out-vote by a great majority the opinions 
 and decisions of the wisest in the nation. No one could 
 rationally desire that women, or children, or those so utter- 
 ly destitute in their circumstances as to be dependent 
 altogether on the will of another for the means of life, 
 3hould exercise equal rights with all others in choosing 
 representatives to rule the state on behalf of the people. 
 In every system of government which has admitted, in 
 however extensive a degree, the principle of representation, 
 some portion of the population have been excluded from 
 such right of election. 
 
 A sound and beneficial system of government through 
 which the bulk of the people are to obtain their share of 
 political power by representation must depend, therefore,
 
 SHARE IN THE GOVERNMENT BY REPRESENTATION. 57 
 
 on some appropriate test of qualification being required in 
 the electors. The true tests, indeed, of •such qualifications 
 are moral virtue and intellectual ability. But, as no rules 
 can be practically enforced for examining into and ascer- 
 taining the mental and moral qualities of individuals — where 
 nature herself has not fixed the stamp of incapacity, as in the 
 instances of children, or of dependence, as in the instance of 
 females — some other external test has to be resorted to, if any 
 there be, which may be betoken the probable existence of 
 these qualities in a greater or less degree. The only test of 
 this kind which can be appealed to is that of Property. The 
 possession of wealth does by no means afford the absolute 
 assurance of superior mental cultivation, or of superior mor- 
 al virtue : neither do those qualities always increase in 
 proportion to the increase of riches. But the experience of 
 nations has proved that, generally, (unless a vicious scheme 
 of political government should oppose it) the mind becomes 
 elevated, the manners become refined, the moral virtues 
 expand, and intellectual cultivation prevails, according as 
 the national wealth abounds. It must be plain that inde- 
 pendent means raise the possessor above the temptation of 
 many of the meaner and most injurious vices ; and they 
 also supply that needful leisure for education, which alone 
 can render the mental powers efficient. And, as property 
 is the most likely test of the requisite qualities in 
 those who are to choose their Representative, so is 
 it the fairest. For the acquisition of property, as among 
 the means of human power and social happiness, is the 
 most open of any to all classes of the people in a well- 
 governed state. But, in truth, the influence of property must, 
 from the very nature of things, always be supreme in a 
 veil-governed state ; because the self-interests of mankind 
 will always impel them to give their labours and services to 
 those who are most able and most willing to reward them. 
 If those who had little or nothing did not pursue their own 
 private interests by this course, they would still nevertheless
 
 58 SHAKE IN THE GOVERNMENT BY REPRESENTATION. 
 
 pursue them ; and the only other course open to them 
 would be by lawlessly invading the property of others. 
 Property would thus change hands, but either it would have 
 its supreme influence, in these new hands — or else it would 
 in like manner be invaded and destroyed again. But, to 
 suppose a total insecurity and open violation of property, is 
 to imply a dissolution of the bonds of government, and even 
 of society. 
 
 From these considerations it will appear that the merit of 
 a system of government, in which the bulk of tlu> people have 
 a share by means of Representation, does not consist in any 
 provision for the will of the people prevailing and becoming 
 actually operative, as regards the measures of the state— but 
 in just provisions being made for their electing such as are 
 most competent to act for their interests, and through 
 whom their opinions, and wishes can be expressed. Still, 
 however, this is not enough. A fitting and well-qualified 
 portion of the people may have been constituted to exercise 
 the power of electing Representatives. Those Representa- 
 tives may be the best capable of perceiving and pursuing 
 the measures most conducive to the service of the common 
 ■welfare of the nation. They may be of sufficient number, 
 and may possess sufficient power to check and prevent the 
 misgovernment of the other constituted authorities of the 
 state. But they may themselves abuse their power, and 
 seek to serve their own interests, rather than those of the 
 community whom they are delegated to represent, and on 
 whose behalf they are appointed to act. And it is likely 
 they will do so, unless the community has the means of 
 securing itself from their misgovernment, by making it 
 more their interest to govern well, than to govern ill. 
 
 These means it may have by limiting the duration of 
 their authority, and making them responsible, at the peril of 
 losing their appointment, in case of betraying their trust, or
 
 SHARE IN THE GOVERNMENT BY REPRESENTATION. 59 
 
 of evincing incapacity to fulfill their duties. The mass of the 
 people are not, indeed, capable of judging # well of the various 
 measures of state ; nor is it possible to provide them with 
 the power and opportunity of dictating such measures j 
 but they are competent, as a body, to judge of the general 
 conduct of their Representatives, and to determine on the 
 quality of flint, conduct by the effects. Dishonesty, corrup- 
 tion, and tyranny can hardly escape their notice. If the 
 duration of their appointment be so short as that no ad- 
 vantage gained in such a period would compensate for their 
 consequent dismission from office, the public would have 
 the security of their own interests for the faithful fulfilment 
 of their duties by their Representatives. In that case, also, 
 the sacrifice <>t the interests of the community by measures 
 injurious to (he common w-elfare would be the sacrifice of their 
 own interests as a members of that community. The in- 
 terests of those who represent become in this way the very 
 same as those of the represented. A complete practical 
 union of the whole body of the people is formed for check- 
 ing the injustice, and rectifying the misgovernment, of the 
 few to whom the actual exercise of political power must 
 necessarily be entrusted.
 
 SECTION X. 
 
 Reflections on the Marks and Characteristics of good 
 Government which have been discussed ; and on the 
 Political conditio?! of India. 
 
 Thus have we examined, though but superficially, into 
 this characteristic virtue of political government,— consisting 
 in the share therein to be vindicated by the bulk of the peo- 
 ple — and which is the most difficult and controverted pro- 
 blem in the science of politics. It is very fit that this qua- 
 lity of government should be sifted and known by all 
 enlightened citizens. But such citizens will be cautious how 
 they are led away by specious and half- considered doctrines 
 on such momentous topics. It behoves all such to weigh in 
 their minds that, as no system of government can be per- 
 fect, so none can be adapted to every variety of people. 
 Bearing in remembrance the true, though ideal, principles 
 of government, the reflecting and influential portion of every 
 nation will still hold in their consideration the peculiar cir- 
 cumstances of their country, both external and personal, as 
 regards the people. They will have to mark what is their 
 general advancement in civilization, in sound knowledge, in 
 religions purity, in moral disposition, and in rational habits. 
 On this must depend the qualifications, not only for con- 
 ducting wisely and beneficially the powers of the state, but 
 for even selecting such as can be entrusted with such autho- 
 rity. Each man's share in the government must depend 
 not only on the general condition of his country, but on the 
 varying personal qualification of the individual. Give the 
 flute to the musician, and the helm to the pilot. Let the 
 lawyer advocate causes —let the statesman propound laws.
 
 REFLECTIONS, &c. Q\ 
 
 It is a vain, and it is a fearful thing for a people to aim at 
 fundamental changes in their schemes pf government, by 
 grasping at a greater share of power than their qualifications 
 in mind and manners will allow of. More than two thousand 
 years have elapsed since many just principles of govern- 
 ment have been from time to time expounded. Hut 
 experience has proved that a wise and efficient repre- 
 sentative system of government must be the slow growth 
 of ages ; and perhaps but one such system has ever arisen 
 on the earth. 
 
 That no such empire should, in the fortune of nations, 
 ever have been founded hitherto in India, will be easily ac- 
 counted for by those who shall have studied i(s history with 
 reflection and discernment, and computed the various com- 
 binations on which the formation and endurance of every 
 mode of government must depend. Independently of those 
 inherent natural causes influencing the destiny of nations, 
 on which I have already dwelt — independently of consi- 
 derations of the national religion and the customs of Caste 
 (topics which I have purposely abstained from touching 
 upon in this discourse but which, as all must feel, incul- 
 cate a peculiar degree of implicit obedience to mere personal 
 authority) — there are other causes for the past ami present 
 political condition of India which can only be sought for 
 in the great chapter of worldly events. What the real 
 history is of the various tribes inhabiting this vast country 
 during many early ages, we must be content to be ignorant 
 of. Hut we know that, during the progress of several 
 later ages, India has been subjected to repeated conquests. 
 It might have been well if the conquering invaders, had 
 brought liberal institutions, liberal arts, and sound know- 
 ledge, in their train. Hut, unhappily, this wide country has 
 ever, till of late, fallen the ea^y prey of savage nations ; 
 who, without civilization amongst themselves, without ra- 
 tional laws or any systematic plan of political government,
 
 go REFLECTIONS, 8tc. 
 
 have conquered but for the purpose of plunder, or have ruled 
 with no other object than exterminating oppression. If, 
 under 'he decrees of Providence, the people of India have 
 now fallen under the sway of another foreign nation, it will 
 be well for them to estimate what changes have been there- 
 by introduced, as regards the happiness of the general 
 community — consisting, as I have declared, in the more 
 perfect enjoyment of private rights and acquisitions, and 
 personal security from wrongs. It will be well that the 
 people of India should estimate how far it is sought that 
 society should be held together by requiring that every man 
 should do his duty by his neighbour, and assist in obliging 
 his neighbour to do his mutual duty towards others — that 
 they should examine t he quality and tendency of their new 
 institutions in rendering them fellow -subjects, and not 
 dependents and slaves. Those who shall follow me in the 
 task I have set myself will, I trust, learn how, as such 
 fellow -subjects, they may, and ought to, contribute toward 
 the preservation of t lie present government. I hope to 
 exhibit to view a plan of power introduced here which, 
 excluding no subject from office and honors, is framed to 
 call forth the interest and assistance of all, and is rightly 
 founded on principles which, according to what is benefi- 
 cially practicable, shall accord to the people at large their 
 just political share. 
 
 There can be no standard of a perfect government, fram- 
 ed for eternal duration. For even were it within the com- 
 pass of human genius to devise such a plan of power as 
 might unite every true principle of political government (as 
 it assuredly is not) yet are the human passions beyond the 
 scope of legislation. The force of ambition and desire 
 continually ur#es us into new efforts for their gratifica- 
 tion, as irresistibly as the external elements work out their 
 chanceful revolutions. Vicissitude is the inherent and uni- 
 versal law of nature. In vain, therefore, have the chiefest
 
 REFLECTIONS, &c. Q3 
 
 among philosophers projected schemes of a perfect com- 
 monwealth ; the very names of which have come prover- 
 bially to denote impossibilities. 1 qually vain, but far more 
 mischievous, are those agitations of the people impelling 
 them to seek for liberty— constitutional liberty — political 
 liberty (terms as yet unknown to my readers, and but ill un- 
 derstood by those who most use them) in some peculiar mo- 
 dification of the powers of government, whereby the actual 
 sense of the whole community shall be taken in every act of 
 the state. The plentiful experience of many nations has 
 taught us that under governments of this kind as much op- 
 pression, and as frequent dissension and change, will arise 
 as under any other. 
 
 What, indeed, is political liberty I should at present 
 vainly attempt to explain ; nor will it admit of exact defini- 
 tion. But, from what I have observed, I think all may rest 
 convinced that no man can pronounce it to consist necessa- 
 rily in this or that particular modification of the powers of 
 government; but we may confidently assume it to exist in 
 proportion as those principles of government which I have 
 endeavoured to lay open are observed. We may look for it 
 under those governments — where the plan of rule, or con- 
 stitution, expressly provides against the abuse of power — 
 where the law sets bounds to the human will. It consists in 
 security from wronJPfcwhuh the arbitrary will of another 
 might inflict ; and in the opinion of safety. Freedom under 
 government is that freedom which is left, after the just pro- 
 tection of the social rights of others shall have been provid- 
 ed for by standing rules to live by, common to all — a freedom 
 to follow our own will only in those things where such 
 sound and just standing rules prescribe not. For there 
 can be no liberty without law.
 
 SECTION XL 
 
 Of the Evils of arbitrary Government. 
 
 I cannot better enforce these last observations, and close 
 the important subject of this discourse, than by contrasting 
 a scheme of government framed on these just principles 
 with that arbitrary power which is guided by no other rule or 
 measure than the will of the supreme governor. 
 
 Under such a government, there can be no other good 
 or evil than such as depends on the passions of an ignorant 
 Prince. Me errs— for who will be bold enough rightly to 
 instruct, him whom all must at every peril please ? He is 
 vicious — for there is no restraint on his appetites. The 
 good is as subject to accident as his caprice — but the evil 
 is as sure as the propensities of men are wicked. 
 
 Under such a government there can be no real love for 
 the Prince, nor reverence for the Laws. For, how can those 
 who have any independence or nobleness of spirit love one 
 whom ihey are ever bound io flatter , amd whose very fancies 
 and most unjust commands they are bound to obey ? How 
 can there be any reverence for laws which can never be 
 certainly known ? Fear is the true spring of such a govern- 
 ment. Not the fear of bad men to break the law and wrong 
 their neighbours ; but the fear of good men, as well as bad, 
 to disobey the very worst command of an absolute Prince, 
 or to resist his utmost oppressions. For such an arbitrary 
 governor will know that, should the sense of terror be 
 relaxed, and any dare to dispute, or even discuss, his orders, 
 his authority, the sole power of his government, is weakened— 
 those who under such a tyrannical sway cease to fear instant
 
 OF THE EVILS OF ARBITRARY GOVERNMENT. 
 
 65 
 
 destruction from disobedience will assuredly begin to 
 govern for themselves. 
 
 Obedience, therefore, must be instant and implicit — 
 without reasoning, without remonstrance, without representa- 
 tions. For if terror be the grand instrument of such a 
 course of government, the mo" arch will set no bounds to his 
 desire of increasing the force and perfection of this instru- 
 ment. To some, tor his own ease, he must entrust a por- 
 tion of his powers — but they will not he many, as they 
 would occasion faction and conspiracies ; nor will they be 
 virtuous or hi^h minded, as such might lean to resistance. 
 From the few, therefore, who govern in his name, the ab- 
 solute monarch will exact precise conformity with his will, 
 under pain of the heaviest and most certain punishment. 
 The few submissive minions, who govern in his name the 
 mass of the people, must accomplish the commands, and 
 uphold the power, of their master by the same course. 
 Where are the limits, then, of cruelty and oppression ? 
 
 Under such a government there can be few, if any, faith- 
 ful advisers. All must advise in peril of their fortunes and 
 of their lives. Those who should counsel the Prince well for 
 the interests of their country, would advise something con- 
 trary to the bent of his inclinations or to the exorbitancy 
 of his desires.. They would advise equal and certain laws, 
 and measures which would conduce to the security and 
 independent spirit of the people. Their counsels, therefore, 
 would tend to weaken the force and main spring of the 
 government ; namely, that fear, which dictates instant sub- 
 mission to arbitrary will. They would advise what would 
 end in convulsions in the state, or else in destruction of 
 themselves. 
 
 Can such a state prosper? Look at the nations around In- 
 dia, governed as they are, and have been for ages, by
 
 66 OF THE EVILS OF ARBITRARY GOVERNMENT. 
 
 arbitrary rule. Compare their condition with that of 
 any other, even the worst governed, nation in the 
 civilized world. It is throughout these Eastern regions 
 of the globe that the most prominent examples of this 
 species of government have prevailed— but, although we 
 find there the most ancient of nations, we find among them 
 the slowest advances made in all that constitutes the hap* 
 piness and resources of a people. Such as they were several 
 thousands of years ago — such are the most of them at this 
 present moment. With minds debased by fear they can 
 have little taste and little appetite for knowledge — nor will 
 the cause of education thrive where the supreme ruler, aware, 
 that knowledge is power, will never seek to abate that igno- 
 rance in which lies his own preservation. Can science or the 
 arts of life flourish, or can industry abound, where there is 
 no safety for the person, or security for possessions ? Why 
 labour — why seek to amass wealth — why engage in enterpris- 
 es-it by the displeasure or rapacity of one man all may in a 
 moment be ruined, and there is no certainty of enjoying any 
 condition of life, or the fruits of toil, even for a day ? In for- 
 mer times there have been governments in India, under 
 which every individual's possessions fell to the Rajah at his 
 death — with whom it rested to seize or to resign them to his 
 family. Can any spirit for useful exertion survive in such 
 a state as this ? 
 
 Riches, indeed, or what the ignorant herd of mankind 
 deem to be such — may abound. The precious metals— which 
 are of no value in themselves, and do but represent, ox give 
 pledge for, the commodities of life in the same manner as 
 scraps of paper money may— are often found to accumulate. 
 Costly jewels, which have no other value than what the fan- 
 cy may invest them with, are seen to glitter in brilliant 
 heaps. Many of the sources, also, of sensual pleasures, and 
 of amusement to the unthoughtfnl and uninformed mind, may 
 exist to excite desire, or even admiration. Riches such as
 
 OF THE EVILS OP ARBITRARY GOVERNMENT. (fl 
 
 these may abound for a time in nations knowing no other 
 law than the will of their monarchs. And they will be 
 found spread, as it were, round the footstool of the throne, 
 for the enjoyment of the Prince and of those whom he may 
 be pleased to favor— the spoils of forced labour and extor- 
 tion. But, of that true wealth of a nation, consisting in the 
 general diffusion of all the products of labour — which nou- 
 rishes a healthful population— and fosters the universal spirit 
 of a people to maintain their possessions in security — there 
 can seldom be any signs. The hoarded treasures of the 
 monarch, however, generally becomes, soon or late, the 
 prey of some conquering spoiler, whom it little concerns the 
 people at large to resist. For what can a people governed as 
 these are suffer from any political change ? Having nothing 
 they can securely call their own ; doomed to their share of 
 general toil for the benefit of others; and holding their lives 
 at the disposal of a master ; can it matter to them by whom, 
 or how, they shall be governed ? " I will send my boot to 
 " govern you," said the absolute Prince to his subjects, 
 lamenting his protracted absence from his country. 
 
 Nor if such a people could escape the frequent miseries of 
 plundering invasions, can they ever hope for any duration 
 of internal peace. For where there is no settled constitu- 
 tion or plan of power, there can be no regular succession to 
 authority. It may he that the sense of the people, or the 
 will of the monarch, may destine the succession to proceed in 
 a certain line. Hut the will of the monarch continually 
 changes. By force or by fraud he may be made to change 
 the destined succession — by falsehood he may be represent- 
 ed to have changed it. There is no rule but the power of 
 a faction to determine it. Accordingly we find, in all the 
 countries round about us, the demises of their sovereign oc- 
 casion periodical convulsions throughout those states. Few 
 instances of such demises occur without a struggle for the 
 supreme dominion— nor are such struggles ever unattended
 
 gg OF THE EVILS OF ARBITRARY GOVERNMENT. 
 
 by bloodshed and violence ; often do they convert the land 
 into a scene of universal devastation. 
 
 Such is government without law. Let us turn our eyes 
 to a different— a noble spectacle.
 
 DISCOURSE II. 
 
 On the Government of England. 
 
 o 
 
 F the Nature and Origin of the English Constitu- 
 tion. Of the Supreme Legislative Authority of the English 
 Government. Of the Queen in her Legislative Capacity. 
 Of the House of Lords. Of the House of Commons. Of 
 the Mode of Enacting Laws, or Statutes. Of the Exe- 
 cutive Branch of the English Government.
 
 DISCOURSE II. 
 
 On the Government of England. 
 
 SECTION I. 
 
 Of the Nature and Origin of the English Constitution. 
 
 T. 
 
 HE people of England have established a certain 
 peculiar plan of government which has become cele- 
 brated throughout, the world by the general term of its 
 Constitution It consists of a scheme pf rules, according to 
 which fha supreme uncontrollable authority, prescribing 
 what shall be done, and prohibiting what is not to be done, 
 is to be exercised. 
 
 It may be thought to require some explanation how any 
 such form of government can be said to be established — or 
 how, if so established, this can ba said to have been accom- 
 plished by the people. It may be objected, that in whatever 
 person, or body of persons, and under whatever set of rules, 
 the supreme authority may have been confided, such autho- 
 rity being supreme and uncontrollable may enable the go- 
 vernors to alter these rules and change the model of the con- 
 stitution altogether. And it may be asked, how can it by 
 possibility be shewn that the people at any time, or by any 
 direct course, or even by any indirect method as acting by 
 representation, arranged and settled this scheme of power. 
 
 But the constitution of England may be truly said to be 
 established, in this sense. Those who come to the exercise 
 of their supreme controllable authority were not originally 
 bom with it. A people with a governing body were not all
 
 72 ORIGIN OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION. 
 
 at once created by supernatural power. Those who take up 
 the sceptre of supreme authority do so either by wrong and 
 violence, and injustice to others (which is a course of go- 
 vernment without any plan or rule whatever — and not the 
 subject of our present consideration) or else upon conces- 
 sion and agreement of the community either express or 
 understood, as regards the terms and objects of their go- 
 vernment. Tf, therefore, such rulers, taking up their autho- 
 rity upon concession and terms, shall betray their trusts, 
 shall abandon their duties, reject the terms, and overthrow 
 the prescribed constitution by which they are to govern — 
 things have reverted to the same condition in which they 
 were before any course of government was conceded or 
 agreed upon. The rulers on the one hand, acting without 
 any sanction of the people, and without any reason or justice 
 on their side, have recourse to new methods of political as- 
 sociation—and the people, are called on to devise or concede 
 to some new plan of power, which, with justice and right on 
 their side, they are entitled to have recourse to. There is 
 no longer any political government at all, until either by 
 wrong, on the one side, or by the exercise of the natural right 
 of the community at large, on the other, to concede or agree 
 to the terms on which they will he governed, a new scheme 
 of power is settled. That form of government, therefore, 
 may be properly said to have been established, independent- 
 ly even of that supreme uncontrollable authority appointed 
 for exercising the powers of government, when the consti- 
 tutional rules of such government are set and prescribed for 
 the rulers as well as the subjects, and cannot be invaded or 
 altered even by the supreme appointed authority itself — un- 
 less the sense of the community at large be newly taken as 
 agreeing to such changes — or except such supreme authority 
 shall, by dissolving altogether the bonds of all political go- 
 vernment, remit to the whole community at large the origi- 
 nal natural right of acting for themselves.
 
 ORIGIN OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION. 73 
 
 So, also, may it justly be said that the people of England 
 have established that scheme of government by the consti- 
 tutional rules of which the supreme authority may be bound 
 to be guided by in the exercise of political powers. It is 
 true that no precise period can be pointed out when any 
 particular form and scheme of government was laid down 
 by general consent. It is true, indeed, that the fundamental 
 rules of the English Constitution, or frame of government, 
 has been constructed gradually, and as it were piecemeal — 
 one rule of government after another. And this is, in fact, a 
 peculiar merit, and source of stability, in the English scheme 
 of government, that, instead of being the product of mere 
 prospective contrivance, it is the growth of ages of experi- 
 ence, and of the reflection of many generations of powerful 
 minds on the true sources of political evils which have been 
 actually suffered, and of political excellencies actually prov- 
 ed. Id the long history of national vicissitudes through 
 which the English government has passed, ample scope and 
 opportunities have been afforded, not only for ascertaining 
 under what rules and principles the people can be best go- 
 verned so as best to secure the true and just ends of politi- 
 cal government, but also to collect the general and repeat- 
 ed expression of the united public voice of the people at large 
 on behalf of the political interests of the community. Of- 
 ten have the oppressions and selfish grasp of power by the 
 Sovereigns of England extorted the indignant and success- 
 ful opposition of the bulk of the people — sometimes the par- 
 tial and overgrown authority of the higher orders in the ex- 
 ercise of the political functions entrusted to them, have re- 
 quired restraint at the hands of the people or at those of the 
 Sovereign himself — often, also, has the wild or misdirected 
 passion of the multitude overborne the deliberative councils 
 of those most competent to conduct with regularity and ef- 
 ficiency the course of government ; and thereby the people 
 have themselves come to learn by disastrous experience how 
 fatal to national prosperity is the absence of control over the
 
 74 ORIGIN OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION. 
 
 popular will, or rather over the violence of the various par- 
 ties who struggle to guide that will. It has been in the pro- 
 gress of vicissitudes of this nature that the people of Eng- 
 land, as a general body, acting in their various classes, and 
 according to their positions in the state or in society, have 
 come gradually to fix rules and limits for the exercise of the 
 supreme authority in its various branches. By some they 
 have been introduced— by others they have been conceded 
 to — by all parties capable of judging they have been for many 
 generations examined, discussed, and proved. They now 
 form a plan of power fixed in the conviction and in the af- 
 fections of the people — a noble fabrick raised by the labour 
 of many centuries, the pride of our nation and the envy of 
 our neighbours. It has been able to resist the storms of 
 political ferments through many ages ; and it can never be 
 overthrown till the whole body of the English people shall 
 have become so corrupt, or so cowardly, as to surrender to a 
 faction, or to an oppressor, what the united sense of the 
 people has established. Let us now contemplate this noble 
 object in all its parts.
 
 SECTION II. 
 
 Of the Supreme or Legislative authority of the English 
 
 Government. 
 
 The supreme authority in England, as in all other coun- 
 tries, is the legislative power. Other authoritative functi- 
 ons in the state may be exercised by high magistrates act- 
 ing altogether independently, and to whom entire discretion 
 may be entrusted in respect of the acts of administration 
 delegated, according to the rules of the Constitution, to be 
 performed by them ; such as the administration of justice 
 by the judges, and the making of war and peace by the King. 
 But, still, such functionaries are not absolutely supreme — 
 for this plain reason — because those who have the power of 
 making laics can at any time interfere by regulating how, 
 and according to what rules, they shall exercise their functi- 
 ons, and pronounce their judgments, for the future, and may 
 even alter what such functionaries may have done. Nay, 
 more — the legislative authority, having the power to make 
 all or any laws, may, practically, even change the quality of 
 the powers which, according to the fundamental rules of the 
 constitution, are specifically entrusted to the exercise of par- 
 ticular functionaries under particular limits. To do that, in- 
 deed, would be (as I have said) to overthrow — as far as such 
 legislative interference went — the constitution itself; and, 
 therefore, it never could be justified, except by the ascertain- 
 ed 3ense of the body of the people concurring. And this is 
 a concurrence which in essential matters, as it must always 
 be very difficult to ascertain, so is it both perilous, and per- 
 haps hopeless, to attempt attaining. Still, as there is no 
 practical,' or actual limit (though certain constitutional rules
 
 75 °F THE SUPREME LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY. 
 
 have been set) in the exercise of the power of making laws 
 upon all and every subject-matter — it is this legislative au- 
 thority and this only, which we must consider as supreme. 
 
 The legislative authority, according to the English Con- 
 stitution, is reposed in a body composed of three separate 
 organs, or agents, of political power. These are 1st, the 
 King or Queen * who acts with the advice, and generally 
 through the persons, of his or her ministers, who are respon- 
 sible for all the royal acts — 2d, an assembly called the House 
 of Lords ; and 3rdly, an assembly called the House of Com- 
 mons. The Queen has other powers, besides those in her 
 legislative capacity, of which I shall have to speak. At 
 present we will regard her as one of the component mem- 
 bers of the supreme authority of the realm. The body, so 
 composed of these three constituent authorities, is called 
 The Parliament. The mode in which its actual and ope- 
 rative powers are exercised is by the passing of laws by 
 their united concurrence — which laws are, accordingly, 
 termed Acts of Parliament. Let us examine the quality 
 and functions of each of these three authorities ; first sepa- 
 rately, and afterwards conjunctively. 
 
 * As a Queen is at present the occupant of the English throne (which 
 may she long continue) the royal authority will in the ensuing pages be 
 designated by that title, or by that of " the Crown," " the Sovereign," 
 " the Monarch."
 
 SECTION III. 
 
 Of the Queen in her Legislative capacity. 
 
 1. The Queen. — The Queen of England, exalted as her 
 rank is — and revered as her person must be, not more as 
 representing a long line of ancestors who have held the 
 same eminent station, than from the vast national import- 
 ance attached to the performance of her functions — holds 
 her highest title to the affection and obedience of her sub- 
 jects as being the First Magistrate in the kingdom. As such 
 she has her duties, like all other magistrates, and the cares 
 of royalty are bound up in the welfare and good government 
 of her people, according to the principles of the Constitution. 
 By the rules of that constitution, she succeeds to her 
 station in virtue of her birth, and as an hereditary right ; 
 and not according to the varying decision of any course of 
 election by the people. For historical experience has long 
 proved to the conviction of the people of England, that a 
 fixed regular appointed course of succession is the surest 
 course of preserving the internal peace of the nation ; and 
 they have relied on the rules and limitations, under which 
 they have established that the Monarch shall execute her 
 great powers, for the protection of the general interests of 
 the community in all her acts of state. They have relied 
 on these appointed rules, rather than on any vain efforts to 
 ascertain or secure the personal qualifications of their first 
 magistrate, as the assurance of their government according 
 to those principles of the constitution — and they have 
 appointed institutions through which the Monarch himself 
 is admonished of his own powers and the relative rights 
 of the people. In a government so constituted it has been 
 thought that no sufficient reason existed for excluding fe-
 
 73 OF THE QUEEN IN HER LEGISLATIVE CAPACITY. 
 
 males from inheriting the crown ; although their claims 
 have been to a certain extent postponed in favour of a male 
 succession. By the constitutional law of England the Sons, 
 all of them according to priority of birth, and their descend- 
 ants in a right line, succeed to the crown in the first in- 
 stance : in default of any sons, or descendants of sons, the 
 daughters and their descendants in like manner succeed, 
 according to priority of their birth. And, whether a male 
 or female sovereign reigns, they hold precisely the same 
 powers. 
 
 As a member, and the Head of the Parliament, the 
 Queen is entrusted with the authority of summoning that 
 Body to meet for the purpose of consulting upon the 
 affairs of the nation, and of passing laws from time to 
 time as may appear requisite. And by the constitutional 
 laws of England she is bound thus to call the Parliament 
 together at least once in three years — and is enjoined so 
 to summon this body once every year, if need be — which 
 need, as it in fact necessarily does arise, the Parliament 
 is summoned, in practice, to meet in the course of every 
 passing year. 
 
 Each of these yearly meetings is called a sessions of the 
 Parliament; and it rests with the Queen, according to her dis- 
 cretion, to put an end to each such session — which is an 
 adjournment of the sitting of the same members of each 
 respective assembly — until such time in the course of the 
 ensuing year as the Queen may in thus adjourning fix for 
 the meeting again. This adjournment is termed the Proro- 
 guing of Parliament, and the period of their separation is 
 termed the Recess. 
 
 The same Parliament cannot meet at these several 
 sessions for more than seven years successively. In the 
 course of that period, and at any such time as the Queen in
 
 OF THE QUEEN IN HER LEGISLATIVE CAPACITY. 79 
 
 her discretion may resolve, her Majesty must put an end 
 to the Parliament itself, and not merely to the sessions of 
 the Parliament : and if the Queen should fail so to put an 
 end to the Parliament, it expires of itself by a sort of natural 
 death. This ending of the Parliament by the monarch is 
 called dissolving the Parliament. The effect of a dissolu- 
 tion of Parliament is, that the functions and authority of 
 each member of the two legislative bodies altogether ends. 
 Another appointment must be made of each of these mem- 
 bers, according to the course provided by the scheme or 
 constitution of the government, which will presently be ex- 
 plained ; and the Queen, by her next summons of a meeting 
 of Parliament, calls together, not a new sessions, but the first 
 sessions of a new Parliament. Moreover the Parliament 
 comes to an end by the death of the King or Queen— for it 
 can only exist as a Parliament for six months thereafter, and 
 may be dissolved at an earlier period by the successor to 
 the Crown. 
 
 Upon the summoning together of the two Houses of Par- 
 liament for a Sessions, it is usual for the Queen to go 
 herself personally in great state to the Parliament House 
 to receive the members of them : although sometimes 
 authority is given to one or more high functionaries 
 to act for, and represent, the monarch on this occasion. 
 Upon the arrival of the Sovereign she proceeds to her 
 throne, or royal chair of state, and, the members of 
 both houses being on that occasion assembled together 
 in the room of the House of Lords, the Queen from 
 her throne addresses the united body in a written speech. 
 In that speech she usually alludes to the external condi- 
 tion of the country, with reference to foreign powers — its 
 internal condition with reference to the public peace and 
 quiet, and all matters of chief concern to the interests and 
 prosperity of the nation — and to the various topics requiring 
 the consideration of Parliament, as connected with the con- 
 dition and prospects of the country, and with the measures
 
 gO OF THE QUEEN IN HER LEGISLATIVE CAPACITY. 
 
 contemplated or in progress by the Queen acting through her 
 ministers in the exercise of the powers entrusted to her (as 
 hereafter explained) in the government of the country. 
 This grand ceremony is called the opening of Parliament. 
 After the delivery of her address the Queen retires, leaving 
 the two houses, each in their separate assembly, to proceed 
 to the business of the sessions, and who themselves adjourn 
 their own meetings from day to day, until the whole session 
 shall be closed by the Prorogation. In the conduct of the 
 business of the two houses the monarch takes no part, 
 save by sending a message occasionally through some one 
 of his or her ministers who may happen to be a member of 
 the house, recommending some particular subject to their 
 consideration. The only further legislative duty and power 
 confided to the monarch, as a constituent member and Head 
 of the Parliament, is that of assenting or dissenting to the 
 acts which are proposed or passed by the united houses ; 
 without which assent no proposed law can have validity. 
 
 It is impossible to contemplate this imposing spectacle of 
 the opening of the British Parliament without a feeling of 
 elevated veneration. The pomp of processions and the 
 glitter of wealth, considered as a mere shoiv, will but little 
 affect the higher orders of mind. It is the occasion only 
 that gives dignity to the scene. It is not the diadem on 
 the Sovereign's brow, nor the robes with which the nobles 
 of the land are clothed, whiu* are the sources of rational 
 admiration. But the thought arises that upon that brow 
 rest the cares of an Empire, the mightiest on the earth — 
 under those robes stand forth the great counsellors of this 
 illustrious state, each of whom boars his share in the bur- 
 then of its government. They are met, as representing the 
 united body of the governor and the governed, practically 
 to renew by a formal example the great compact between 
 the monarch and her subjects, under which the constitution 
 is maintained, and the rights of the people and the glory
 
 OF THE QUEEN IN HER LEGISLATIVE CAPACITY. Q\ 
 
 of the nation are to he preserved. We see standing 
 amongst them the ablest statesmen, and the most power- 
 ful orators— we think of the vast human interests entrusted 
 to their charge— and we know that on their voice will de- 
 pend the well being of millions, and the fate of nations. 
 They are met, as the grandest and most potent assembly 
 ever invested with authority over their fellow-men, to take 
 part in the first solemn act of entering upon political duties, 
 the influence of which will extend throughout the whole 
 civilized globe.
 
 SECTION IV. 
 
 Of the House of Lords, 
 
 2. Let us next examine the quality and functions of the 
 higher of these two assemblies — the House of Lords. 
 
 The Members of the House of Lords are such high dig- 
 nitaries, who have been themselves, or whose ancestors (to 
 whose rights and honors they have succeeded by course of 
 inheritance) have been, raised to such eminent station by 
 the grace and favor of the Sovereign. Those who, ihe first 
 of their families, are thus raised to such high dignity, are 
 presumed to be selected on account of conspicuous services 
 rendered to the state in the course of public employments, 
 or of pre-eminent talents and qualifications for the public 
 service, and sometimes on account of that extensive influ- 
 ence among the people which great wealth, justly accumu- 
 lated and liberally disbursed for the public good, naturally 
 confers. All these individuals are termed Lords of Par- 
 liament. Among those who have been themselves thus 
 selected, and whose rights and honors do not descend to 
 their families, is a body of persons who, under the tides of 
 Arch Bishops and Bishops, have confided to them by the 
 Sovereign certain duties and authorities in support of reli- 
 gion — and who in virtue of such office are entitled to a seat 
 in this house, with all the same legislative powers as the 
 other Lords ; although they seldom take any active share 
 in any other business of the legislature save that which is 
 more or less connected with religious affairs. The other 
 members of this house, whose honors and rights descend 
 in course of inheritance, are termed Peers ; and' are some-
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. g3 
 
 times called temporal Lords, to distinguish them from the 
 other religious Lords who are denominated spiritual Lords. 
 
 These Peers, or temporal Lords, although all equal in 
 respect of their powers and privileges as members of one 
 of the Houses of Parliament, hold different ranks and pre- 
 cedencies among one another, and before the public. Their 
 rank (with the exception of such of the King's own family 
 who may happen to be Peers, and who always rank highest, 
 and of a few other instances of rank according to some 
 particular offices in the state) depends on the quality of 
 their title, called their title of nobility. The first or high- 
 est title is that of Duke; 2d. that of Marquis; 3d. that 
 of Earl; 4th. that of Viscount; and 5th. that of Baron. 
 But, it may here be noticed that the rank of an Archbishop 
 is before all other Lords of Parliament except those of the 
 royal family ; and that the rank of a Bishop is next after 
 that of Viscount. 
 
 It has been noticed that it is the King or Queen, acting 
 by his or her mere grace and favor, who calls up from out 
 of the body of the people such as he or she may think 
 deserving to be advanced to the dignity of a Lord of Par- 
 liament. It must be obvious that to such high authority 
 only can a power of this important nature (which must be 
 personally delegated to some person or party) be entrusted. 
 If a judgment is to be formed of the merits of a statesman, 
 or public servant, that judgment should rather be formed 
 by the most exalted personage of the slate, whose labours in 
 the duties of the government have been assisted by him, 
 and who is the supreme magistrate over all classes, than by 
 any party of men in the state, who, having no supreme au- 
 thority in themselves over their fellow-subjects, but having 1 
 necessarily objects of separate ambition or interest, 
 would in all likelihood render such power of advancing 
 others subservient to the private purposes of a faction.
 
 g4 OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. 
 
 Still, it may be thought, that the Queen herself, having such 
 
 a t tnary power of creating members with a voice in 
 
 f 
 stale affairs, miyht have inducements to fill an assembly 
 
 of this nature with her own creatures, pledged to execute 
 
 her own will and designs, and thereby overbalance the 
 
 co-equal power entrusted by the constitution to the other 
 
 house, and give a casting majority in the House of Lords 
 
 itself. But, here, the principles and fundamental 
 
 rules of that constitution would oppose a barrier. For 
 
 all the nation could judge that these rules were broken and 
 
 betrayed, were it apparent that Peers were plentifully 
 
 created — not for any purpose of the general public service, 
 
 or as an honorable reward for great national exploits — but 
 
 merely with a view to particular favourite measures, or to 
 
 aggrandize the power of the Sovereign. And while the body 
 
 of the people have the means, through those who we shall 
 
 presently see represent them in the other house, it can 
 
 never be hoped that arbitrary and unconstitutional views of 
 
 this nature can be indulged without soon meeting an effectual 
 
 check. 
 
 In alluding to the mode of dissolving Parliaments, it was 
 said that, after a dissolution of the Parliament, newly 
 appointed members were called to the next Parliament 
 summoned. And this is literally true with regard to the 
 members of the House of Commons — but, as respects the 
 members of the House of Lords, it is to be noticed that 
 the Queen summons each individual member personally (as 
 if he was then newly appointed) at every meeting of a new 
 Parliament; which summons, however, cannot be refused 
 to any Peer. The only actually new persons, therefore, 
 summoned as Lords to any new Parliament called together, 
 are, 1st, those who may have been newly appointed Spiri- 
 tual Lords in the place of those deceased ; 2dly, those who 
 may have succeeded as heirs to Temporal Lords deceased; 
 and 3dly, those who may have been newly created Peers by 
 the grace and favor of the Crown.
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. g«j 
 
 The Lords are attended at their sittings by more or less, 
 and sometimes (as the greatness of the occasion may sug- 
 gest) by all the Supreme Judges, and* by other functi- 
 onaries of eminence in the law, for the purpose of assisting 
 them with advice on legal points. But none of these legal 
 dignitaries are members of the house, or have any right to 
 vote ; nor have they any right to speak therein, except 
 when called upon. 
 
 Each of the Lords may delegate any other Lord in his 
 own absence to vote for him upon all or any questions dis- 
 cussed before the house. This may be thought, perhaps, 
 to be somewhat an unreasonable privilege, inasmuch as it 
 miybt appear like voting blindfold, and for mere party 
 purposes, to decide questions of policy, without hearing the 
 discussion of ihem. I will, however, only notice so much 
 in explanation of a privilege the expediency of which has 
 occasionally been canvassed, but has now for many ages 
 been allowed to subsist as not having been found incom- 
 patible wiib propriety — that the Lords (as has been explain- 
 ed) are not liable to be changed at every new Parliament, 
 and that each of them therefore alicays forms a component 
 portion of the legislature. 1 1 " is among the duties of his 
 whole life and station always to be informed of the 
 general policy and course of government of his country, 
 and to become acquainted with the principles on which 
 any particular class of ministers selected by the Crown con- 
 duct the affairs of the state. Indeed, most of the indivi- 
 dual measures of the more important quality, and which 
 usually occupy most time in debate, he may be presumed 
 to have more or less previously considered. As, therefore, 
 the Peer is not the representative of any other body, but 
 himself, always intrusted with an actual share in conducting 
 the affairs of government, and may be presumed to have 
 studied the tendency of most of the measures under discus- 
 sion, there is nothing so unreasonable, as might at first ap-
 
 86 
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. 
 
 pear, in his exercising the influence of his vote, even on occa- 
 sions when he may not be present personally to enforce his 
 own opinioi* and co listen to those of others. 
 
 Upon all questions debated in this House, each Peer has 
 the privilege of entering upon the books of the public pro- 
 ceedings his dissent, and his reasons of dissent, to the mea- 
 sure proposed. And the only other distinguishing privilege 
 of this House of Lords, which seems necessary to be noticed 
 separately, is that of solely examining, discussing, and decid- 
 ing on such of their rights as are supposed to exist, already, 
 and of solely originating any legislative measures which may 
 affect their future rights, individually, as Lords of Parlia- 
 ment, or as a body composing this separate assembly. These 
 Acts, or measures, may be rejected or assented to by the other 
 house, but the latter has no power to change or alter them. 
 
 Such are the Lords of Parliament — a body as old as the 
 independence of the national government, and the institu- 
 tion and existence of which is bound up with the prosperity 
 and glory of the British nation. For the distinction of rank 
 and honors is necessary in every well-governed state, as the 
 reward of public services, and the appropriate incentive to 
 great actions. Those who are actuated by a generous emula- 
 tion for such distinction among their fellow-subjects can 
 never be unmindful of the dictates of virtue and loyalty to 
 the Sovereign and to the constitution. Those who succeed 
 by inheritance to such honors, if they may not. surpass or 
 rival the glory of the.ir ancestors, will scorn to disgrace their 
 name. Holding their honors and their position in the slate 
 independently, they will feel an interest in protecting the 
 constitution from invasion by any combinations of the Sover- 
 eign's ministers against the freedom or political rights of 
 the people, or by any encroachment of the mass of the peo- 
 ple upon the due authority of the Crown ; since every advance 
 towards new or arbitrary powers by the monarch, or towards
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS. 
 
 87 
 
 uncontrollable rule by tbe people, must tend to diminish or 
 overwhelm their own influence. Removed by ^ir wealth, 
 or at least, competency, from all those cares whiWthe neces- 
 sity of earning a livelihood imposes, they have the greater 
 leisure, as well as the great er inclination, to dedicate them- 
 selves to the public service, and to all those departments 
 of liberal education which may best fit them for the affairs of 
 government. Nor is the grand test of national experience 
 wanting to stamp the tried value of such an institution of 
 dignified men, with their distinct assembly, distinct delibe- 
 rations, and distinct powers. For often have the Peers of 
 England proved the firm and successful champions of the 
 people, against the Crown, itself for the attainment and main- 
 tenance of their best laws, and just political rights — and as 
 often have they withstood the folly and fury of the people, 
 whose factions would otherwise have utterly overthrown all 
 government and all law.
 
 SECTION V. 
 
 Of the House of Commons. 
 
 3. 
 
 Lastly, let us inquire into the quality of the third con- 
 stituent part of the supreme legislative council of England — 
 the House of Commons, 
 
 The members of this assembly are called the Commons^ 
 inasmuch as they are members of the community at large; 
 not having any titles of dignity as Peers or Lords of Parlia- 
 ment, but chosen or delegated by certain qualified classes 
 of the people to represent them especially among the rest of 
 the community, and to act on their behalf. 
 
 We have seen that, after a certain number obsessions and 
 prorogations of the Parliament composed of the two assem- 
 blies, that Parliament is at length dissolved, and a new Par- 
 liament is to be summoned. The Lords are summoned by 
 a special letter directed by the authority of the Queen to each 
 individual Lord. Let us see how the members of the House 
 of Commons are summoned. 
 
 This is managed by a similar letter directed to certain 
 officers, having the same name and executing similar duties 
 to those performed by the Sheriff's in India. These Sheriffs 
 are required to hold meetings in their several districts 
 (called in England Counties, into one hundred and sixteen, 
 of which the whole of the British territories of England, 
 Wales, Scotland and Ireland are divided; for the election of 
 one, two, and in some instances more, members for each 
 sut h district ; and they are likewise required to cause certain 
 officers, or head authorities, in certain specified chief Cities 
 and Towns in their several districts to hold like meetings for
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. g9 
 
 the election of one, two, and sometimes more, members for 
 each such city or town. The number of members, and the 
 districts or cities or towns which at such meetings are to 
 elect, are all expressly specified hy the law. These mem- 
 bers so elected are said to represent the places for rather 
 the people of the places) for which, and at which, they are 
 elected — and are commonly called The, Members for such 
 places The number of members for Counties is 252, that 
 for Cities, Boroughs, and three Universities is 40G. The 
 whole amount of members is 653. 
 
 There are certain qualifications requisite to make persons 
 eligible as members of the House of Commons — and they 
 are these : 1st. The candidates must be of the age of 21. 
 years. 2nd. Tltey must be subjects born in some part of 
 the Queen's dominions. 3rd. They must not be any of the 
 Supreme Judges. 4th. They must not be persons dedicated 
 to the administration of the national religion. 5th. They 
 must not he any of the persons (such as sheriffs and others) 
 appointed by law to manage the elections. Gib. They must 
 nol be persons connected with certain offices for the collec* 
 tion of taxes. 7th. They must not be persons enjoying any 
 pension by the bounty of the Queen; and if any member 
 takes an office of profit paid hy the Crown, he must there- 
 upon vacate his seat — hut he may here-elected. 8th. They 
 must not have been convicted of any of the more serious 
 crimes. 9th. They must (with certain few exceptions) have 
 property in land to the value of 600£ per annum, to he eligi- 
 ble as members of Counties — and of 300£, to be eligible for 
 any City or Town. 
 
 The qualifications for /Vectors of members are; 1st, that 
 they should have a certain amount of interest in landed 
 property— according to the nature of that interest. Hut 
 the amount and nature of this interest vary so much, ac- 
 cording to the ancient customs of the several districts and
 
 90 0F THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 
 
 places, that it would be tedious, in a general discourse of 
 this quality, to detail all the differences and peculiarities of 
 rights to elect, ' founded on this property. The obvious 
 principle on which this qualification is required, is that 
 property gives some assurance, not merely of independence 
 in the exercise of this important right, hut. also of some 
 cultivation of mind and knowledge of the world — qualities 
 so much needed in the direction of a free and competent 
 choice. But it is equally a constitutional principle that 
 the right of electing should be extended to all classes of 
 the people, as far as is consistent with that competency and 
 independence; and, accordingly, the property qualification is 
 reduced to a very low standard — the mere renting* a house 
 of the value of 10£ per annum being a sufficient qualifica- 
 tion in some instances, or the owning lan*l to the amount 
 of 2£ per annum being sufficient in others, and the merely 
 inhabiting any house as a tenant being sufficient in others. 
 
 In some few places the right depends on being enrolled as 
 or members of some particular trades ; and in two instances, 
 those of the two Unive>sities (as the great central institu- 
 tions for the education of the superior orders are called) 
 the qualification depends on advancement to a certain, rank 
 among the members of such Universities. 
 
 Further qualifications are— 2nd. That the Electors shall 
 be 21 years of age. 3rd. That they shall not have been 
 convicted of any of the more serious crimes, or of that of per- 
 jury, or of having been bribed at any Election. 4th. That 
 they shall only have one vote for each distinct property, or 
 other qualifying right to vote. 
 
 Next is to be considered the mode of Election. This is 
 settled bv special laws, which contain a multitude of pro- 
 visions directed to ensure, as far as human laws can, 
 the unbiassed and nncorrupted exercise of a free, choice by 
 the Electors, according to their own discretion — to afford
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 9][ 
 
 full opportunity to all who have the right of Election 
 for exercising that right — ami for precluding false or erro- 
 neous claims to the exercise of it. With this view all 
 military persons are to absent themselves from the place 
 of Election, during the time of voting— all Lords of Par- 
 liament are forbidden to interfere, as are various other 
 persons holding offices of influence. These precautions 
 have reference to the exclusion of all undue bias or 
 intimidation. But further and very strict provisions have 
 been made to prevent bribery through the proffer of any 
 gifts or oln ;es of em dument. I have no occasion fur- 
 ther to detail the nature of these provisions, being of so 
 local an interest ; but a feeling of regret is not to be dis- 
 guised (hat the depravity of mankind is too often superior 
 to the utmost legislative efforts to guard against influences 
 of this nature. 
 
 On the days appointed for holding the Elections, the 
 Sheriffs presiding at. the meetings of their several Counties, 
 and the other head functionaries presiding over those of 
 the Ci -id Towns, declare the purpose of each i ly. 
 
 'I hereupon any Elector proposes any person who happens 
 to he a candidate, or whom he supposes willing to become 
 so, which proposition is seconded by another Elector. The 
 same course is pursued for each person nominated as a 
 candidate. After such propositions of the several candi- 
 dates the sense of the meeting is taken by the President 
 calling for a show of hands. If no more candidates are 
 proposed than the place has the right to elect, ami if any 
 number whatever vote by their show of hands for such candi- 
 dates, they are thereupon at once declared duly elected, and 
 the meeting closes. Bui, if there are more such candidates, 
 the President judges from the show of hands which of them 
 have the majority, and declares the election to have fallen 
 Upon such as have such majority. Upon this declaration 
 every candidate, or proposer of a candidate, who is in the
 
 92 OP THE HOUSE OP COMMONS. 
 
 minority, has the right to demand that the separate votes 
 shall betaken of all the Electors, both present ana absent, 
 who may within the time prefixed for such purpose, come 
 and proffer his vote. And this is a course, in fact, gener- 
 ally had recourse to, when a greater number are proposed 
 than the place can elect— inasmuch as the casual attendance, 
 personally, and show of hands at the meeting can give but 
 little insight into the wishes of the whole body of Electors ; 
 and it may be presumed that each candidate who has any 
 serious pretensions desires that the express opinion of the 
 whole body should be declared. The proffering and record- 
 ing of votes then proceeds — each Elector presenting himself 
 openly in public for that purpose. If required, he must 
 swear to his qualification, every precaution having in the 
 meantime been taken by the course pointed out by law of 
 registering and ascertaining his right of voting. The 
 President of the meeting presides also from day to day at 
 the taking of the votes, assisted by such advisers as he may 
 think fit, and he has the original power (subject to subse- 
 quent appeal) of admitting or rejecting the votes offered, 
 according to the nature of any objections raised. At the 
 end of the time prefixed by law for receiving votes, the 
 numbers voting for each candidate are ascertained, and, 
 according to the majority, the members are declared to be 
 duly elected. 
 
 The Sheriffs, after receiving these reports from the pre- 
 siding officers of the Cities, and Towns within their Coun- 
 ties, send them, together with the reports of the result of 
 the Elections in their several Counties, to the appointed 
 government office. These reports are termed their /?<?- 
 turns. — Upon the next meeting of Parliament any can- 
 didate may petition the House of Commons to examine and 
 decide on the legal validity of any return, and for the re- 
 turn being amended by his own name being inserted instead 
 of that of any o^her candidate. A delegated number of the
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 
 
 93 
 
 members are thereupon appointed for this purpose, — and 
 their determination finally adjudges the right of sitting as 
 a member. 
 
 Thus it is that the people of England (among whom I 
 include those of Scotland and Ireland") have and exercise their 
 share in the supreme government. Those whom the Elec- 
 tors of each place shall choose do not, indeed, represent 
 those Electors only — although by the very act of such choos- 
 ing each of these bodies of Electors expressly participate in 
 some degree in the government. But each member of the 
 Commons' house of Parliament acts for, and represents, the 
 ichole body of the people. He does not go to Parliament as 
 a delegate or agent, merely, to submit, and act upon, the 
 instructions of those who elect him. If it were so, it would 
 be plainly requisite that the body who send him should 
 themselves, not only be competent, but have the means of 
 discussing and determining previously all measures and laws 
 which Parliament is to pass. This discussion, however, as 
 well as the determining, is not entrusted to the Electors, but 
 to the Parliament. That assembly is the deliberative organ 
 of the whole nation. Those who go there, therefore, ought 
 to bring their own judgment, to bear on proposed laws ; and 
 not the instructions of those who have not entrusted to 
 them the power or the means of deciding on political mea- 
 sures. It would be a strange absurdity that members of the 
 national legislature should meet and discuss questions which 
 others, who have not discussed them, have previously decid- 
 ed and given their orders upon. The opinions come to by the 
 Electors, who for the most part are of the middle and inferior 
 classes of the industrious — formed without any regular 
 debate, often taken up without personal inquiry, and often- 
 cr without due .information and reflection — are not only 
 liable to change, but are peculiarly exposed to delusion and 
 error. He, therefore, that should on all occasions blindly 
 pursue the dictates of such instructors would generally be-
 
 94 0F THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 
 
 tray, rather than serve, the interests of those who had, chosen 
 him for a legislator. Besides this, it is to he recollected 
 thai, in the government of such a vast and various empire 
 as composes the whole British nation, the legislature is call- 
 ed on to deliberate and decide on a mass of interests so nu- 
 merous and so intricate, that very few of them indeed can 
 have ever become the subject of consideration in each place 
 which elects a member for Parliament. 
 
 But, still, in the general public conduct of the Representa- 
 tive elected, and in many of the more important measures 
 on which he is called on to pronounce his sentiments or his 
 vote, there is, and ever must be, a close union and corres- 
 pondence between the member and his constituents. And, 
 besides that, the local interests of each place, which are 
 sometimes (and especially in large districts or commercial 
 cities) of national importance, also require an especial or 
 in the grand assembly of the legislature. !t is this tie between 
 the electors and the elected, and this special duty imposed 
 on the former by the latter on their own local behalf which 
 renders (he whole body of the House of Commons the true 
 Representatives of the whole body of the people, who thereby 
 exercise a practical influence, not only in the formation, but 
 also in the measures, of the government. No doubt the elec- 
 tors have, and generally use also, the right of calling on their 
 Representatives from time to time for afull explanation of all 
 their political sentiments and acts — and the electors have 
 the means of meeting and comparing, for their general guid- 
 ance, their own common feelings in regard to those measures 
 in which their Representatives have taken their part. The 
 expression of such common feelings.must ever be entitled to 
 respect, and will assuredly have its weight. And, with this 
 view, our admirable constitution provides that once in seven 
 years, at least, all the electors in the empire shall necessari- 
 ly have this opportunity of sanctioning or repudiating the 
 proceedings of their Representatives, through the course of
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 95 
 
 re-electing them, or by their rejection in favor of other 
 candidates. Thus it is that, by possessing these sure and 
 ample means of uniting their wishes and sentiments with 
 those of their Representatives in all their polit ical acts, the 
 people are enabled to identify their own interests with 
 those of the individuals who form one, and the greatest, 
 of the organs of the Supreme Government of the nation, 
 and thereby to exercise in a substantial sense their 
 share in such government. While their voice can thus be 
 at all times plainly and clearly heard, and while that influ- 
 ence which must ever attend the expression of that general 
 voice shall he exerted, as a component portion of the will of 
 government itself, it is certain that neither the arbitrary 
 power of one, nor of a few, nor of any portion whatever, among 
 the people can arise to overthrow the common interests, and 
 establish the reign of misgovernment, terror, and injustice. 
 
 This system, moreover, of Representation, such as I have 
 endeavoured to explain it, is intended (as far as human 
 foresight, and the experience of past ages can accomplish 
 it) to comprise substantially the whole body of the people. 
 It is obvious, if we look at the aim and principle of election, 
 thai, as regards those who ought to exercise this riyhf, we 
 can only take into our consideration such as are competent 
 to it in point of understanding and independence. i\ large 
 portion of the people must, consequently, be struck out of 
 the number of Electors, as either not fit to he represented, 
 or represented by identification with others. Thus Chil- 
 dren and those who are utterly ignorant and destitute, (to 
 say nothing of criminals can hardly be expected to become 
 Electors. Thus, also, our constitutional law, having reference 
 to domestic ties and to the general dependence of all fe- 
 males in every station of life, excludes them from such 
 privilege. But, besides 'hoc, there is a verj huge class of 
 the community so entirely dependent on the inclination or 
 power of others, in regard to their interests — or who, from
 
 96 
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 
 
 their very low pecuniary circumstances, may be made so, 
 that to give such parties the right of Election would in ef- 
 fect be no more than unduly to increase the votes of the 
 wealthier classes. No political subject whatever has occa- 
 sioned more heats or controversy in England than this of 
 the proper extent of the right of Election. It has generally 
 been supposed that by late Acts of Parliament this right 
 has been extended up to the very verge of expediency — and 
 many consider far beyond it. The lovers of peace now 
 trust that agitations on this topic may cease : and it surely 
 may be some reason in the minds of the well-disposed for 
 such cessation, that to all classes of the male population 
 is this right open to attainment, by mere freedom from 
 crime, and by the acquisition of the most slender pecuniary 
 stake in the country. 
 
 Having now enquired into the mode of Election of the 
 members of the House of Commons, and examined into 
 the nature and operation of that Share which the whole 
 people of England have thereby in the government of their 
 country, it remains but to say that this house has the 
 sole authority to discuss and decide questions affecting their 
 own existing rights, or to originate legislative measures 
 affecting their own future rights, either individually or as 
 a body, and to notice one other important particular, as dis- 
 tinguishing the functions of this House from those of the 
 House of Lords. It is a privilege of the people of England 
 that they cannot be taxed for any public purposes of govern- 
 ment except by their own consent, expressed through their 
 legitimate organ the House of Commons, with whom alone 
 any act for taxation, or any grant of the public funds, can 
 originate. This privilege is the very corner-stone of that 
 structure of government whose foundation is the duly ascer- 
 tained sense of the people. As it is a necessary principle 
 of every form of government that the support of its charges 
 shall fall upon the industry of the people, so is it a' principle
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 97 
 
 of the British constitution that the people themselves shall 
 through their Representatives guard the supply from the 
 demands of those other powers of the state, who, having 
 private interests of their own apart from those of the people 
 at large, might be influenced to increase the public burdens 
 for their own objects. At the same time, although it would 
 prove a factious violation of the constitutional law to refuse 
 those supplies which are evidently necessary for the pur- 
 poses of government, or at all events to refuse them except 
 in self-defence against palpable violations of that law by 
 those entrusted with the administration of government, yet 
 this exclusive power over the finances of the country furnishes 
 to the people's branch of the legislature another absolute 
 check against the encroachments of arbitrary authority, 
 should any monarch or his ministers be so rash as to attempt 
 them. 
 
 It may readily he presumed that, next to the Lords them- 
 selves, the members of the House of Commons are among 
 the most eminent men of the nation. Large wealth will un- 
 doubtedly in itself clothe the possessors with that influence 
 which would go far towards ensuring an election to this 
 august body. But it is seldom that the mere possession of 
 riches is the main qualification of such as gain that station. 
 The people naturally look to their Representatives taking 
 more or less share in the public business of the assembly: 
 it is very certain that no part can be efficiently taken with- 
 out some talents, and much information. But those who 
 aspire to distinction in an assembly like this will know 
 that such an ambition would be vain and hopeless to any 
 but such as possess surpassing abilities, qualifying them to 
 conduct or advocate the vast and various interests of an 
 Empire on which the sun never sets. It is in this assembly, 
 therefore, that have shone forth, and still flourish, those 
 great men whose fame fills the whole earth. It is among 
 the debates of this body that we must look for the examples
 
 98 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 
 
 of that eloquence, which, while it convinces, delights, or 
 amazes, fixes fo^ ever the prosperity of nations. From this 
 assembly we are to trace the many grand measures and laws 
 which are the glory of the English nation and the admira- 
 tion of the world. In this nursery have been fostered 
 statesmen who have become the lights of political govern- 
 ment, and by whose genius Empires have been raised or 
 overwhelmed. 
 
 Constituted as this assembly is, it must always have the 
 chief influence in the state. For, being the organ of the 
 whole body of the people, and being through its members 
 individually in continual correspondence with the people, 
 the permanent and decided expression of its sentiments can 
 hardly be resisted. In the conduct of the legislative business, 
 and in the passing of Acts, though all these branches of this 
 legislature must concur, yet they each act distinctly, and 
 each House proposes and discusses separately. The mea- 
 sures originated by the Lords, however wise they may 'be, 
 yet, as exemplifying the sense of only a very small though 
 important portion of the people, they will hardly be pressed 
 against the united conviction of the people themselves as ma- 
 nifested in their own House. This former body, will, there- 
 fore, watch and seek to instruct, rather than to force, the gene- 
 ral sense of the people in the political projects they them- 
 selves introduce. And in the consideration, also, by the Lords 
 of the measures proposed to them by the Commons, their 
 great constitutional service in the state will be best evinced 
 by the wholesome check which their discussions, as well as 
 their power, will impose on hasty and ill-considered legis- 
 lation, and by the sagacious and discreet improvements they 
 will make in the laws submitted to them. The Sovereign, 
 in the mean while, possesses in the power of Dissolution the 
 means of personal appeal to the people, upon all great politi- 
 cal questions about which the two great Councils of the na- 
 tion may differ. But, when this House of Lords shall have
 
 OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. 99 
 
 learnt the incontestible sentiments of the united people and 
 their steady perseverance in them, or when the monarch shall 
 have been thus instructed in relation to the steps that should 
 be taken in the administration of his government, or in the 
 choice of his ministers appointed to conduct it, there can be 
 few cases, indeed, in which a continued resistance to those 
 expressed sentiments would be justifiable, and fewer still in 
 which such resistance would be prudent. Such cases of 
 justifiable resistance may arise — our constitution supposes the 
 possibility of them. But we should rather lament than con- 
 template that possibility of their occurrence, in the appre- 
 hension that they would be cases when a large majority of 
 the whole people should aim at overturning the system it- 
 self of the government, and its constitutional rules.
 
 SECTION VI. 
 
 Of the mode of enacting Laws, or Statutes. 
 
 Let us now turn our attention to the proceedings of the 
 whole legislative body conjunctively — in other words to the 
 mode of passing Acts, and to the quality of other business of 
 the Parliament, in the conduct of which each house observes 
 substantially the same course. 
 
 With a view to the better and more independent perform- 
 ance of these great duties on behalf of their country, the 
 members of both Houses of Parliament are exempt from any 
 arrest of (heir persons by the legal process of any Courts of 
 Justice, except for crimes. But a more important and 
 necessary privilege enjoyed by the members, for the same 
 end, is that of entire freedom of speech, subject only to the 
 rules of each house for the preservation of regularity and 
 decorum. No magistrate and no functionary in the kingdom 
 is so high, but that his conduct may be examined and censur- 
 ed in these assemblies — no measures in the administration 
 of government, by whomsoever advocated or effected, are 
 free from attack and exposure. However mistaken the 
 censurer may be, either as to facts or opinions, he is not 
 to be questioned for the statement of his sentiments— for, 
 great as may be the inconveniences from occasional publici- 
 ty given to prejudice and error, they are as nothing when 
 compared with the ill consequences of any hindrance to a 
 fearless discharge of duty to the state. For the better go- 
 vernment, however, of the business and debates of Parlia- 
 ment, each house has its President, whose prominent duty 
 it is to enforce those rules of the Houses which have been
 
 MODE OF ENACTING LAWS OR STATUTES. \Q\ 
 
 framed for ensuring propriety in debate, and due order in 
 the conduct of business ; and whose word upon such subjects 
 is the law. 
 
 The Statutes, or Acts of Parliament, are laics: and, like all 
 other proceedings of the House, must be passed through all 
 its stages by a majority. When a new law is to be propos- 
 ed, the member desiring to propose it must first move for' 
 and obtain leave from the House to bring in, or exhibit to 
 be read, such law. Upon the motion being made, it must 
 be seconded by another member — and then every member 
 is at liberty to state his sentiments upon the motion. Upon 
 the debate concluded, the president (who in the House of 
 Commons is a member elected among themselves, and call- 
 ed the Speaker, and in the House of Lords is the highest 
 judge in the realm, called the Lord Chancellor) puts the 
 question. The votes are given openly by voice ; and the 
 majority of those then assemble.d on the question being put 
 decide it by assenting or dissenting. It is seldom*, however, 
 that any debate arises on this preliminary question of 
 asking leave to bring in a law ; and leave is not often refused. 
 
 The bringing in the law, which until finally passed is 
 called a Bill, is by delivering it, at the proper time after 
 leave given, into the hands of an officer in the House, while 
 sitting, and then moving that it be read a first time. This 
 motion must be seconded ; and the same course is pursued 
 in deciding upon that motion, as before in asking leave to 
 bring the Bill in. It is seldom that any serious debate or 
 opposition arises to this first reading. 
 
 At a competent time the member again moves that the 
 Bill be read a second time. And it is upon this motion 
 that, according to the nature and importance of the law, a 
 debate (if there be any opposition intended) arises. If the 
 Bill is allowed by a majority to be read a second time, the
 
 102 
 
 MODE OF ENACTING LAWS OR STATUTES. 
 
 next course is to refer it to the examination, of a Committee, 
 who discuss the Bill, clause by clause, with a view to any 
 amendments which may appear requisite in the details ; all 
 which amendments, on being proposed, are carried or reject- 
 ed by a majority. After it has thus passed through a 
 Committee it is moved to be read a third time — 
 which though occasionally, and especially in very im- 
 portant matters, opposed, is usually allowed without de- 
 bate. Finally, the President puts the question whether the 
 Bill shall now pass — which may in like manner be opposed, 
 but very seldom is so. The Bill has now gone through all 
 the forms and discussions required in the House where it 
 originates, and is thereupon taken and delivered into the 
 hands of an officer of the other House. Some member of 
 that House must there propose it to be read in his own House; 
 otherwise the Bill drops altogether — but if any member shall 
 so take up the Bill, the same course must be pursued in hav- 
 ing it read and debated three several times, as has been be- 
 fore pursued in the other House. Whatever alterations are 
 made, the Bill must be returned to the House wherein it ori- 
 ginated for its concurrence, without which the bill must 
 either be allowed to pass without the alterations, or else it 
 must be dropped altogether. And, it is to be observed, that 
 a Bill once rejected cannot be brought forward again during 
 the same sessions. 
 
 The Bill having passed in this way through both Houses is 
 finally presented to the Queen, or some person authorized to 
 represent her on the occasion, for her assent. For the rea- 
 sons already alluded to, an instance has not happened for 
 near two hundred years of the refusal of the Royal assent to 
 a bill thus brought forward by both Houses of Parliament. 
 The Bill then becomes an Act of Parliament, sometimes 
 called a Statute, and becomes part of the imperative sure 
 law of the land.
 
 MODE Of ENACTING LAWS OR STATUTES. JQ3 
 
 It is worthy to be observed with how many precautions, 
 and with what provisions for ample consideration and dis- 
 cussion, the constitution has guarded the enactment of the 
 national laws. It is not to be expected that any Bill would 
 be introduced to the notice of such an assembly as the Par- 
 liament without mature reflection on the principles of the 
 projected law, and without an accurate scrutiny even of its 
 very language. The opportunities for debate are such as to 
 preclude all hasty and unadvised decisions by those to whom 
 the laws are submitted for sanction. At the same time the 
 necessity of passing every law by the same course through 
 both Houses, acting independently, renders each assembly a 
 check upon the exorbitances of the other; and, thus, each 
 branch of the legislature is said to support and be supported, 
 to regulate and be regulated, by the other. 
 
 Such is the method of passing Acts of Parliament, which 
 are the Statutes, and form a large portion of the laws of the 
 English Empire ; and by such course it was that, after the 
 examination of many volumes of evidence delivered before 
 the two Houses,the last great Charter Act for the government 
 of India was enacted. But there are many other important 
 political functions performed by the Houses of Parliament, 
 the chief of which should be enumerated before we pass to 
 the consideration of the administrative branch of the Eng- 
 lish government. 
 
 Among these functions one is, to receive petitions from any 
 recognized portion of the people, or even from any indivi- 
 dual, which petitions have for their object any public 
 measures for the relief, or for the benefit of the petitioners, 
 and which relief or benefit may not happen to hi within the 
 ordinary compass of the existing laws. Another is, that of 
 passing resolutions upon the quality of any public measures, 
 or the conduct of any public men, or on other topics, directed 
 to the support, or introduction, or amendment of proceed-
 
 [I 4 MODE OF ENACTING LAWS OR STATUTES. 
 
 ings connected with the administrative government of the 
 country. Another is, that of passing addresses to the Sover- 
 eign upon the same or similar topics. And, lastly, I shall 
 notice that momentous power vested in the Common's House, 
 of bringing charges to be tried before the Lords of Parlia- 
 ment, sitting on such occasions as the highest judicial 
 court of the whole Empire, against any individuals for such 
 high crimes against the state, or the constitutional liberties 
 or rights of the people, as the ordinary laws of the country 
 cannot reach. Thus all acts of oppression in the conduct of 
 any branch of the government by great officers of the state, 
 all attempts by them to subvert the fundamental rules of the 
 constitution, are subjects of these charges brought by the 
 body of the people themselves, through their Representatives, 
 against such powerful delinquents. This formidable power, 
 against which not the mightiest Minister of state can prevail, 
 affords the last of those efficient securities which I have had 
 to enumerate for the maintenance of English constitution, 
 and for the protection of all the subjects of the British Em- 
 pire from arbitrary and tyrannical government. 
 
 All these various topics of debate form the copious subjects 
 of those Reports of Parliamentary proceedings with which 
 the English newspapers during the Sessions of Parliament 
 are for the most part filled. It is beside my present object 
 to explain the nature and effects of that liberty of writing 
 and printing whatever each man thinks proper, subject only 
 to responsibility to the Courts of Justice for any injury to 
 the public, or to any private individual, thereby, which among 
 the Natives of this country, as well as in England, is com- 
 monly known by the terms of Liberty of the Press. I notice 
 it now, merely for the sake of shewing its operation in diffus- 
 ing far and wide over the whole civilized earth, and among 
 all classes, a full and accurate account of whatever any 
 member of Parliament utters in that assembly of the slight- 
 est importance in a public point of view. The art of noting
 
 MODE OF ENACTING LAWS OR STATUTES, ]Q5 
 
 from the mouth of a public speaker the purport of his 
 speeches is one of considerable skill, ar.d the arrangements 
 for a speedy publication of such notes are 1 curious and ex- 
 tensive. But to such perfection has the method been 
 brought in England that, within a very few hours after each 
 individual has delivered his speech, or even an observation, 
 and after the debate has closed, the whole purport of the 
 discussion, with all its peculiarities and interruptions, and 
 in many instances incorporating the very words themselves 
 of the speakers, is presented to the reader of the English 
 newspaper. By this means, not only is an enlightened 
 curiosity gratified, but an exact knowledge is continually 
 gained of the conduct and sentiments of every member of 
 the government, and of every public measure in contempla- 
 tion. The body of the people thereby become themselves 
 the guardians of their own political rights and interests.
 
 SECTION VII. 
 
 Of the Executive Branch of the English Government. 
 
 We will now direct our attention to another, and not less 
 important, branch of the English political government, as 
 settled to be conducted by the rules of the constitution, 
 which is the Administrative government, or the Queen's 
 government — and usually termed the Executive govern- 
 ment. 
 
 It must be obvious that but a small part of government 
 consists of making laws — for the greater practical busi- 
 ness of government is that of carrying on its affairs accord- 
 ing to those laws, and the rules of the constitution. 
 
 This Administrative, or Executive, department of govern- 
 ment is entrusted to the discretion of the Queen — or, as I 
 shall choose to denominate the power personally resting 
 in the monarch who may be either King or Queen, the 
 Crown. That discretion is no otherwise limited than by 
 the requisite observance of the laws actually existing, and 
 the legislative authority of the Parliament. But, to under- 
 stand correctly the nature and the limits of that discretion, 
 we must examine in detail the powers of the Crown, known 
 in England by the term its Prerogatives. 
 
 The first I shall notice is that of the Crown's personal in- 
 dependence of all other jurisdictions. As it is said in the 
 terms of the English law — the King can do no icrong. 
 This, it is true, is a mere notion, or doctrine, or supposi- 
 tion. The wearer of the Crown may commit error ; may
 
 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. \Q7 
 
 even betray the trusts reposed— but it is a principle of the 
 constitutional law not to suppose it, and therefore on no ac- 
 count personally to charge it. In the Executive department 
 the Crown is personally supreme ; in the Legislative it is a 
 component portion of the uncontrollable supreme authority 
 of the whole Empire. No tribunal, therefore, can have superi- 
 ority over the monarch personally. The rules of the consti- 
 tution provide that every thing shall be presumed to have 
 been done by the, Crown through the advice of her Ministers 
 —and accordingly they, and they only, are held responsi- 
 ble for all her measures. This doctrine of the respon- 
 sibility of the Ministers for all acts of the Crown, while it 
 imposes no injustice whatever on those Ministers who can al- 
 ways refuse their assent, or ask (heir dismissal from office, 
 on occasions when they disapprove of the proposed mea- 
 sures of the Crown, provides a sure remedy against those 
 abuses which evil counsellors or agents of the Crown might 
 attempt under its sanction. But though the exalted quali- 
 ty of the monarch exempts her personally from any human 
 tribunal, yet, such is the system and frame of the constitu- 
 tion, that any positive efforts (which the law in decency will 
 not even suppose) through her chosen agents to subvert the 
 rules and the rights of the people, would at least meet 
 with effectual opposition, and endanger the enjoyment of 
 that regal capacity, which in truth by such a course of con- 
 duct would have been abandoned. The monarch has her 
 duli; and obligations, like other inferior functionaries of the 
 state, which main duty is, to govern according to law. 
 
 In the exercise of the Sovereign's vast powers for the pub- 
 lic good, according to her mere discretion through her res- 
 ponsible ministers, we must, therefore, look to those matters 
 in which the positive laws of the state, and the acknowledg- 
 ed rules of the constitution are altogether silent. The next 
 Prerogative power, then, which we will notice, as entrusted 
 to the Crown's discretion is, Secondly, that the monarch
 
 203 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. 
 
 shall act as the sole representative of the people in all mat- 
 ters iu the relation of the British Empire with foreign in- 
 dependent powers. 
 
 Thus, the Crown has sole authority of declaring war or 
 peace with foreign nations, and of carrying on with that 
 despatch, decision, and consistency which is obviously ne- 
 cessary (but which a numerous community or body of coun- 
 sellors could never so well accomplish) the important and 
 complicated concerns attending on the waging of wars, or 
 the maintenance of peace. It is the Crown which appoints 
 all Ambassadors, and makes all treaties with foreign states. 
 It is the same authority which allows, or prohibits, the ac- 
 cess or residence of foreigners within the British territories. 
 It is the Sovereign who raises, and who is the supreme head 
 over all the Military and Naval forces, and the governor 
 over all Forts, and over all havens and ports of the sea. 
 
 Thirdly, should be mentioned, the royal Prerogative of 
 assenting to, or dissenting from, Bills of Parliament ; which, 
 having been alluded to before, is only repeated now as ex- 
 plaining that, in whatever cases (as in the instance of the 
 Government of India) any prerogatives of the Crown are de- 
 legated to subordinate governors, the Queen does in effect 
 exercise her own Prerogative by herself voluntarily concede 
 ing, in her capacity of head of the Parliament, such powers, 
 to be applied according to the specified arrangements pro- 
 vided by the Act or Statute. 
 
 Fourthly, the Crown is the source, or fountain, and the 
 general distributor, of justice throughout, the Empire. It 
 is not to be supposed that justice flows from the royal 
 mind as having its origin there. The law is the true origin 
 and source of justice ; the Sovereign is rather the reservoir, 
 and the supreme administrator of justice. And in early times 
 the King himself personally sat as the supreme judge in all
 
 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. JQg 
 
 causes — but such a course is quite incompatible with the 
 condition of civilized countries, and with a state of things 
 when accurate certainty and extensive learriing becomes ne- 
 cessary for right adjudication according to the laws. It 
 has, consequently, become a principle in the English con- 
 stitution that the King shall administer justice through 
 appointed Judges. 
 
 The Queen, therefore, alone has the power of erecting all 
 Courts of Judicature — as in India the King originally did, 
 until the whole course of the India Government became 
 settled by Statute. The Crown still, however, exercises that 
 authority in erecting the Supreme Courts of Judicature in In- 
 dia, and appoints the Judges of those Courts. It is under 
 this Prerogative we must class the sole power of pardoning 
 criminals — a power often delegated to the governors of 
 Colonies, as to a very considerable extent it is entrusted to 
 the Governments of India ; but which is still reserved to 
 the Crown as regards all criminals convicted before the 
 Supreme Court. Before quitting this subject, I should no- 
 tice that no portion of the constitutional law is more strict- 
 ly guarded than that which is directed to ensure the inde- 
 pendence of the Judges. The fearless discharge of their 
 duty, unawed and unbiassed by the Crown or the ministers 
 of Government, is considered of far more importance than 
 even their freedom from error or ignorance. For it is ever 
 the dearest privilege of Englishmen that they shall be 
 under the dominion of the law, and not of any man's will, 
 or wishes, or inclinations. It is, therefore, ;so provided, that 
 nothing short of the Parliament itself, can interfere, upon 
 clear cause shewn, for the displacing a Supreme Judge 
 in England— and great, though by no means so extensive, 
 precautions of a similar kind surround the character and 
 independence of the Supreme Judges even of the distant 
 Colonies,
 
 110 
 
 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. 
 
 Fifthly, the Sovereign is the true fountain of honor and 
 office. Her sole authority of making Lords of Parliament 
 has already been explained. But there are many other 
 gradations of rank, and of titles, and of personal distinc- 
 tions, known in England. Thus Lords who are not Lords 
 of Parliament may, and sometimes are, created by the 
 Crown. Thus, likewise, the people of India are familiar 
 with other distinguishing titles in the Army and Civil Ser- 
 vice, such as persons bearing the title of Right Honorable, 
 and Honorable, Baronets, and Knights of various classes. 
 So also, the holding of offices under the state is, in itself, a 
 species of distinction and honor ; and all such offices spring 
 originally from the Crown. For instance, in England, all 
 Justices of the peace are so appointed by the Queen herself 
 — and it is only by authority of an Act of Parliament that 
 this appointment of Justices of the peace is made by the 
 Governments of India. In'like manner all Commissions, 
 and Ranks in the Army and Navyiare held from the Crown ; 
 although those in the East India Company's Army and 
 Navy are given by the Directors of that Company by au- 
 thority of statutes. 
 
 Sixthly, the Sovereign is the supreme Governor and ar- 
 biter in the affairs of Commerce. As regards foreign 
 trade the Crown can, indeed, by this Prerogative interfere 
 but little — inasmuch as independent states will not be con- 
 trolled by the authority of other states. Neither can the 
 Crown legally dictate or regulate the terms of such trade, 
 beyond such matters as concern the portion of that trade 
 necessarily conducted within her own dominions. Moreover, 
 all such regulations of foreign trade, as well as that which 
 is carried on between England and the Queen's own foreign 
 dominions, have been provided, upon a just observance of 
 the infinite number of commercial interests, by Acts of 
 Parliament— as, particularly, the trade between England 
 and the eastern countries; which, however, originally was 

 
 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. ] ] { 
 
 regulated by the authority of the Crown alone. But, as 
 regards the domestic or internal commerce of England 
 itself, various exercises of Prerogative still prevail, such as 
 the erection of any new public markets— the regulation of 
 fixed weights and measures — and, what is the most mate- 
 rial of all, the sole right of coining money, of whatever 
 denominations or declared value, but which must be of 
 either gold, silver, or copper. I will not expatiate upon so 
 extensive a subject as the nafure and use of current money 
 — which nature and uses, rightly understood, must neces- 
 sarily govern this exercise of the royal Prerogative. It 
 will be sufficient to say that this royal authority is not of that 
 mere discretionary or arbitrary nature, as that the pecu» 
 niary concerns of the people can be exposed to confusion or 
 ruin thereby. It is a power, which, as it must for the sake 
 of certainty and regularity in such concerns be reposed 
 somewhere, is reposed in the Crown under settled limits 
 calculated to preserve the integrity of all pecuniary deal- 
 ings between man and man. 
 
 Lastly, the Sovereign is the supreme Governor over 
 the affairs of Religion. This does not imply that the 
 Crown can dictate the religious Faith, or the modes of Wor- 
 ship, among her subjects. That is left to their own consciences 
 and convictions. It cannot be properly made the ""subject 
 of force. But, in England, there are rules or doctrines of 
 religious Faith, as regards the nature of the Deity, and the 
 disclosure by him to mankind of his will in respect of their 
 conduct towards him and towards their fellow-creatures, 
 which have been received as sacred truths by the governing 
 power of the state, and are consequently maintained by its 
 authority. In this sense, the Queen, as the Chief Magistrate 
 of the state, is the. head and chief governor in matters of 
 religion. It is she that appoints the functionaries of the 
 Church, and all priestly magistrates having authority in the 
 conduct of the national worship. Thus, she not only ap-
 
 |]2 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. 
 
 points all Bishops in England, but also the Bishops in In- 
 dia, and in all other parts of the British dominions. 
 Other religions are not only permitted, but they are under 
 the law protected — so that every man may worship God 
 according to his own form of Faith in peace and security. 
 
 By the English law all charities axe considered as founded 
 in religion, and consequently they fall within the Sovereign's 
 protective Prerogative. The Queen has the governance and 
 control over air charitable foundations and gifts, under 
 whatever form of Faith, or for whatever humane pur- 
 poses dedicated. This, is a necessary consequence of 
 the Sovereign's possessing the chief administrative 
 power ; as, otherwise, this property would have "no spe- 
 cific owner — which is obviously requisite for insuring 
 the just objects of all charitable dispositions. For if the 
 royal authority was not interposed through her appointed 
 officers for the protection of such Institutions against fraud 
 and spoliation, what hope could there be for the maintenance 
 and prosperity of any of these public establishments, whether 
 for education, or relief to the sick or destitute ? For the ob- 
 jects of such institutions are too weak to befriend them- 
 selves. 
 
 Thfift, it will be seen, that the royal authority ranges over 
 the whole compass of the administration of government — 
 and is the supreme Executive power of the State. Supreme 
 in one sense, because there is no superior authority from 
 which orders in the Administrative department can flow, nor 
 any to which appeal can be made for the control of those 
 measures entrusted to the discretion of the Crown. But, 
 still, this discretion and these powers are not altogether 
 arbitrary and absolute ; but are to be guided by certain 
 references and principles. The Queen must govern accord- 
 ing to the Laws — the monarchy is said to be "a limited mon- 
 archy"— -limited by the rules of the constitution, and by the
 
 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. ] 13 
 
 express laws made by the supreme legislative authority of 
 the Empire. What negociations shall be made with foreign 
 powers — whether war or peace shall prevail — what armies 
 shall be raised, and who shall bear command in them — what 
 courts of law shall be established, and who shall preside in 
 them — how to maintain the national religion and whom to 
 appoint its ministers — and such like prerogatives, are all 
 within the sole consideration of the Crown. But, to deliver 
 up the national independence to foreign powers — to make 
 war for private objects of ambition — to cover the land 
 with standing armies, and compel the people to serve in 
 them — to erect courts with unusual judicial powers, 
 and to dictate the law, or how that law shall be 
 administered — to change the national religion, or to attempt 
 force upon the conscience in matters of Faith — are all be- 
 yond the power of the monarch herself. And the law of 
 the constitution has appointed a course of calling in question 
 those acts of the Crown which violate the rules of that con- 
 stitution, or are wickedly directed against the private rights 
 or political liberties of the people. For, although the person 
 of the King or Queen's majesty is sacred from all human 
 visitation — yet the Ministers of that Crown are answerable to 
 the people, through the Parliament, for all the measures 
 emanating from the royal authority. The Queen, therefore, 
 governs through her Ministers. 
 
 In the choice of these Ministers the Queen's sole discre- 
 tion is supreme. Influenced indeed in all cases, and even 
 governed in some extremities, that discretion must ever be 
 by the united voice of Parliament. For that is an authority, 
 which under a judicial course of procedure may condemn 
 that Minister who may have betrayed his country's interests 
 to death itself — and no royal inclinations can withstand the 
 opposition of a whole people against the disastrous measures 
 of a weak or wilful ministry. But, according to the ordinary 
 course of administering the government, it is within the
 
 J J ^ EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. 
 
 Queen's breast to select those irfwhom to repose her confi- 
 dence, and with whom to consult in the exercise of the pow- 
 ers of her Prerogative. Thus, one high functionary of state 
 is placed over the affairs of the nation with foreign countries 
 — another over the affairs of the law— another over those 
 of the colonies — another specially over the affairs of India- — 
 and so on. Over the whole body of Ministers one is selected 
 as the more immediate organ of the Crown, and is 
 termed the Prime Minister, by whose name the particular ad- 
 ministrations of government during the time of his presiding 
 is usually distinguished. 
 
 Limited as the powers of the Crown are, the limitations, 
 are of a character rather to exalt, than to lower, the true dig- 
 nity of the monarch. The real rank and dignity of a monarch 
 must be estimated, not so much by the extent of his domi- 
 nions and the obedience he can enforce, as by the independ- 
 ence of those dominions of all influence or control from 
 foreign states — by the wealth and resources of his people— by 
 their love towards the Sovereign's person — and by their quali- 
 ty and advancement among the civilized nations of the earth. 
 Judged by all, or any, of these standards, where shall we 
 find a monarch who can surpass, or even rival, the Queen 
 of England ? It is not on the splendour of her palaces and do. 
 mestic court that the Englishman loves to dwell in uphold- 
 ing the personal honor of his Queen — it is in pointing at the 
 glory of that nation which she has been called to govern — 
 its great deeds, and great men— its abounding and industri- 
 ous population — its wealth and security— the many, the im- 
 mense, and the distant countries under her sway — and the 
 proud feelings which inspire this mighty people to preserve 
 their renowned station among states even against the world in 
 arms. It can never impair the true dignity and honor of a 
 monarch over such a people, that its assigned powers are 
 united with duties ; and that they are bound by rules
 
 EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT. 
 
 115 
 
 founded on t lie experience of ages, as best calculated to en- 
 sure the national prosperity against human error or caprice. 
 
 By the dispensation of Providence these wide countries of 
 India have been brought under the sway of this great Em- 
 pire — and the dictates of its government, the principles of 
 which I have endeavoured to unfold, all who live in this 
 land equally obey. For the Natives of this country, 
 and the English and others who find in it a home, are 
 all equal in the sight of the law. To all of us the same 
 protection is due, and by all the same rights may be 
 claimed. The sole difference lies in our various quali- 
 fications ; and arises from the exercise of that sound discre- 
 tion and judgment which the local governments of this 
 country— guided and controlled as they are under provisions 
 made by the superior authority of our common Government 
 of England— are bound to exercise for the political and ge- 
 neral benefit of all. 
 
 But these considerations lead me to a new, and perhaps 
 a more interesting, subject.
 
 DISCOURSE 111. 
 
 Of the East India Company. 
 
 / 
 
 NTRODUCTORY Observations. Of the meaning 
 of the word " Company ,•" and of the Nature and Objects 
 of such an Association. Of the Origin and Formation 
 of the East India Company. Of the Progress of the East 
 India Company, until they became a Political Power. 
 Survey of the Political Progress and Condition of the 
 Native States of India, previous to the Conquests of the 
 East India Company. Of the Progressive Conquests of 
 European JYations in India, and the Effects. Of the 
 Means and Resources of the East India Company for 
 the Conquest of India. Of the Component Members of 
 the East India Company : the Proprietors of Stock.
 
 DISCOURSE III. 
 
 Of the East India Company. 
 
 SECTION I. 
 
 Introductory Observations. 
 
 I 
 
 T was about the year 1590 of the Christian era that a 
 few merchants, travelling from Aleppo on the coast of the 
 Mediterranean Sea, down the Tigris to Bagdat, and sailing 
 from the mouth of that river across the Persian Gulf to 
 Goa, planted the first English footsteps on the shores of 
 India. They traced their way from Goa northward to the 
 cities of Agra and of Lahore. They thence traversed the 
 fertile plains of Bengal. Embarking again at the mouths 
 of the Ganges, they gradually compassed the whole circuit 
 of India ; and, finally, retracing their course across the 
 Persian Gulf, and thence by the Tigris and the Mediterra- 
 nean Sea, they returned to their native country. 
 
 These venturous men, weak strangers in a foreign land, 
 passed from city to city over the dominions of various 
 powerful rulers governing under the supreme authority of 
 one great Potentate. They depended for safety and pro- 
 tection on the mere curiosity of the people around them, 
 and on the consideration yielded to the humble insignificancy 
 of their character. They were the first to give an account 
 to their countrymen of the existence of an Empire which, 
 as regards natural wealth and resources, was one of the 
 most magnificent on the fuce of the earth ; and which 
 contained a population outnumbering by ten times the 
 whole of the people at that time under the British sway.
 
 120 
 
 INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS. 
 
 Within two centuries and a half from that period this 
 vast Empire has been totally overthrown ; and all the ex- 
 tensive dominions subjected to its authority have become 
 consolidated anew, under the rule of a nation separated 
 from them by fifteen thousand miles of ocean. It has 
 been subdued by a body of Englishmen whose political 
 power and means were of little consideration, compared 
 with those of the other governing authorities of England. 
 They have achieved this conquest with less than one-twen- 
 tieth .part of the military strength of a Nation whose whole 
 territory was no larger than an Indian Province. State 
 after state has been reduced under the government of their 
 servants. At length the supreme power of the great 
 Mussulman Chief over all, whose armies had from age to 
 age spread desolation throughout the ancient Hindoo Go- 
 vernments, and established the despotism of many foreign 
 masters in their place, was destined to give way to English 
 domination. The wide regions enclosed by the Himmalaya 
 Mountains on the north, the Berhampootra on the east, the 
 Punjab on the west and by the wide ocean reaching round 
 from the Indus to the Ganges — including a hundred ancient 
 nations — has finally become an united portion of the great 
 British Empire. 
 
 So firmly is the English Government established through 
 its well regulated plan of power, that the evils of internal 
 war and devastation have long ceased ; and all commotions 
 attempted to be raised have become plainly desperate. 
 With so much wisdom and foresight have the resources of 
 national strength been called forth and organized, that 
 surrounding nations stand in awe of that might they can 
 never hope to match, and which is competent to defy and 
 to repel the whole world in arms. So regular and settled is 
 the administration of the government and the laws, that the 
 people enjoy a peaceful security hitherto unknown since 
 the time of its history, and have made advances in national 
 prosperity which no former government has ever witnessed.
 
 INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS. J 21 
 
 The course of events which has effected this stupendous 
 change is the wonder and admiration of the world. Few 
 but must have some curiosity to learn the' origin and pro- 
 gress of transactions such as these. Some, however, 
 are content to read of the battles, sieges, marches, and 
 all the vicissitudes of warfare— the politic devices, 
 and the turns of fortune — through which Princes have 
 been deposed, and countries won ; without casting much 
 thought on the creation and quality of those original pow- 
 ers out of which the means arose of attempting these grand 
 objects, or through which they were actually accomplished. 
 Others, and for the most part the Native community of In- 
 dia, who have as yet so little access to that genuine history 
 and information on these topics which must naturally in- 
 terest the great bulk of the people, are constrained to at- 
 tribute these events to some incomprehensible but all- 
 powerful political body, of which they know no more than 
 its designation of "the Company." Their minds are utterly 
 puzzled to account for its resources and authority — they do 
 but know that, under whatever reverses, their means have 
 ever appeared to be unexhausted, and they settle to the 
 conviction that their power is irresistible. Others, again, 
 can with difficulty believe that any other cause than mere 
 delusion and accumulated mischances could have occasioned 
 the overthrow of so many kingdoms, and so great an Empire. 
 They cling to the notion that common energy on the part 
 of the people would have prevented all conquests heretofore., 
 and that some union of efforts might still raise the fallen 
 powers into existence again. They indulge a false estimate 
 of past times — and most erroneously suppose that greater 
 peace, and tranquillity, and plenty, prevailed under ancient 
 governments ; and would so prevail again, should some 
 general insurrection" succeed in restoring them. 
 
 It will be my business in the ensuing pages, to explain 
 what that body called " The East India Company" really is —
 
 122 
 
 INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS. 
 
 how it originated — what is the quality of its constitution— 
 and according to what plan, or system its powers are exer- 
 cised — what were its efficient means of subjecting India to 
 the British Empire — and by what course it continues to 
 superintend and control the government of the country. 
 The details of those glorious victories, and able political 
 measures, by which the subjection of the country was ac- 
 complished, and by which, so many distinguished men 
 among the Company's servants have immortalized their 
 own fame and that of their country, is the proper theme for 
 the historian's pen. That portion only of the historian's 
 task will be mine, whereby may be unfolded tbe sufficient 
 causes and means of these great achievements; and whereby 
 it may be shown that the condition of the country, of its 
 governments, and of its people, gave ample scope for those 
 successes which military valour and political talent ensured. 
 It will then be perceived by reflecting minds that no exer- 
 tion on the part of the people, and no efforts on the part of 
 their misgoverning rulers, could long have retarded the sub- 
 version of the country under some new dominion. And it 
 may be hoped that all who have just views of the true pros- 
 perity of a nation will become convinced, that the destruc- 
 tion of the British power and of its plan of government, 
 whether by the successful force of Native or of Foreign con- 
 querors, would assuredly involve this vast country in uni- 
 versal rapine and violence, and remove to distant ages all 
 prospect of a settled rule under equal laws.
 
 SECTION ir. 
 
 Of the Meaning of the term Company; and of the Nature 
 
 and Objects of such an Association. 
 
 Any number of men associated together for a particular 
 purpose may be properly called a Company : but the term 
 is most usually applied to those bodies who bind themselves 
 together by some mutual covenants or rules, with a view to 
 carry on some general course of trading, or some particular 
 branch of manufacture or commerce. Thus, four or five 
 persons, and sometimes a greater number, agree together to 
 become partners in carrying on commercial dealings, when 
 the business they engage in is of that extent, and requires 
 so large a capital, as to suggest a subdivision of labour, 
 and a joint contribution of funds. They settle the terms 
 on which their affairs shall be managed, and the profits 
 divided, by some express written instrument. They there- 
 by become a Company, and trade under that designation — 
 one such Company being distinguished from another by 
 a reference to the names of some one or more of its mem- 
 bers, or by a reference to the nature of the business carried 
 on, or the object of their association. Thus we hear of 
 Arbuthnot and Company, the British Iron Company, 
 Duarkath Tagore and Company, the Equitable Insurance 
 Company, and so on. 
 
 Private and voluntary associations such as these, provid- 
 ing as they do for a succession of members as vacancies oc- 
 cur in the partnership, are calculated, when their affairs 
 are judiciously managed, to last long; and some such houses 
 of trade, through their extensive dealings and large accu-
 
 ]24 0F THE MEANING OF THE TERM COMPANY, &c. 
 
 mulations of capital have exercised great influence on a 
 whole nation's commerce. The union of many such houses 
 for the purpose of representing and protecting the general 
 interests of all trading classes will necessarily have weight 
 with even the Council of Government, and will sometimes 
 qualify, and sometimes dictate, its commercial measures. 
 But such private partnerships have in their very constitu- 
 tion the seeds of gradual decay — the bond of association by 
 which they are kept together is uncertain and discretionary in 
 point of duration — their capital, and the power and influ- 
 ence depending on its amount, is necessarily confined with- 
 in very narrow limits. For, in the first place, each individual 
 member being responsible in his person and estate for the 
 whole amount of the Company's debts, their speculations 
 would naturally be the less bold and extensive. In the next 
 place, it must be expected that, in a long series of years and 
 changes of members, the mischances of trade, or the mis- 
 management of the partners, would at some time or other 
 dissipate the whole existing capital, and thus at once dis- 
 solve the association. In the third place, it has always hap- 
 pened that the expenditure, or the accumulation of each 
 member for his own personal objects, has kept the current 
 capital, and the consequent extent of their dealings, within 
 such bounds as would always leave the Company exposed to 
 the various chances of dissolution. And, lastly, the exist- 
 ing members commonly, at onetime or other, combine in 
 the desire to abandon the labours of their business, and 
 either appropriate their whole funds by division, or trans- 
 fer some remnant of them into the hands of other parties, 
 who commence a new course of dealing, or one upon some 
 smaller scale. Under all these circumstances there are few 
 instances of private trading houses sustaining their existence 
 as an associated Company beyond the period of a hundred 
 years ; and none of their effecting any of political results 
 beyond the immediate commercial objects of their uniting in 
 partnership.
 
 OF THE MEANING OF THE TERM COMPANY, fee. ] 95 
 
 But there are some commercial enterprises of such mag- 
 nitude, calling for so large an extent of capital, involving so 
 much risk, demanding so much the discussion of able and 
 experienced men, and requiring the various labour of so 
 many in the management of them, that they are quite be- 
 yond the means, as well as the courage, of a few individuals 
 bound together only by their private mutual covenants. 
 They can only be undertaken by the strength of the govern- 
 ment itself, and the employment of the national funds of the 
 people, or else by some numerous association of a public 
 quality, sustained by special privileges and powers, and se- 
 cured from sudden dissolution, and the individual ruin of its 
 members, by express public rules and laws. It is seldom 
 that a Government can engage advantageously in any trad- 
 ing affairs, which so peculiarly depend on that activity and 
 zeal which is only to be kept alive by some personal inter- 
 est in the results. It has, therefore, been the constant 
 policy of the English Government rather to encourage such 
 speculative undertakings by those who are altogether uncon- 
 nected with its administration ; and which undertakings it 
 has always shewn itself ready to assist by the delegation of 
 all those powers and privileges, which, according to the spe- 
 cific quality of each such speculation, those who engaged in 
 them might appear to stand in need of. 
 
 Objects of this nature have suggested the formation 
 of Companies of a different, a more extensive, and a 
 far more powerful and permanent quality, than those 
 Companies which arise out of mere trading partnerships 
 governed by the private covenants of the members. Vari- 
 ous as may be the powers granted by the Government to 
 such associations— various as may be the peculiar advan- 
 tages conceded, in .proportion to the risk of losses in the 
 undertaking— and various as may be the systems laid down 
 for conducting their respective affairs, there are some char-
 
 J OQ OF THE MEANING OF THE TERM COMPANY, &c. 
 
 acteristics which all such Companies have in common, and 
 which it is expedient to hring to particular notice. 
 
 The acquisition of the great capital required can only be 
 accomplished by dividing the shares into a large number, 
 the price of each being of so moderate an amount as that 
 every person joining in the undertaking may take a larger 
 or smaller stake in the concern proportionate to his means. 
 According to the amount of the capital must therefore be 
 the number of the shareholders— and that number is never 
 so small but that a selection must be made from the general 
 body of some small portion who are to represent all parties, 
 and conduct, or at least govern, on behalf of the whole 
 association, the details of their business. Each individual 
 member is only to be responsible to the extent and value 
 of the contribution by which he has purchased his share. 
 With that view, the whole body is to be considered by all 
 who deal with them as if it was one individual person ; its 
 joint properly being only liable to be made available for the 
 payment of debts, and for the satisfaction of engagements, 
 but not the private property of any of the members, and 
 still less their persons being subject to imprisonment, as 
 other private persons would be for the purpose of enforcing 
 payment of their private debts. Such a scheme for the 
 transfer and inheritance of the shares of each member, and 
 also for election to all vacancies arising among the directors 
 or governors of the affairs of the Company, is provided by 
 the express laws constituting the Company, that the exist- 
 ence of the Company must last as long as the law itself 
 lasts on which its existence is based. Not even the loss of 
 all their property can put a final end to the Company. It 
 may still raise new funds, or it may still exercise any pow- 
 ers or privileges which do not depend on the employment 
 of capital. And, lastly, such a plan for the internal go- 
 vernment of the united body is ordained, as that the reso- 
 lutions of a majority, in some cases that of general assem-
 
 OF THE MEANING OF THE TERM COMPANY, &c. ] 27 
 
 blies of all who will attend, in others that of the selected 
 governors — in some cases a simple majority, in others a 
 majority of some larger proportion — shall' bind the whole 
 Company : and in a similar manner general regulations are 
 allowed to be passed, for permanent observance in the con- 
 duct of their affairs. 
 
 Under such a constitution as this, and with these funda- 
 mental powers for their support, many important Companies 
 of a national interest and character have been formed in 
 most of the countries of Europe. In none, however, have 
 they existed so numerously as in England ; and in no other 
 country have such extensive enterprises been undertaken or 
 accomplished through such bodies. But neither in England 
 itself, nor in any nation on the face of the globe, has there 
 ever arisen an association, which— whether we look to the 
 enormous amount of its expenditure and of its accumulated 
 wealth, or to its influence on the commerce of the world, or 
 to the vast political changes it has effected — has equalled 
 that of the East India Company in real grandeur and im- 
 portance. Its origin, constitution, powers, and privileges we 
 will now proceed more particularly to examine.
 
 SECTION III. 
 
 Of the Origin and Formation of the East India Company. 
 
 The trade between Europe and India had from the ear- 
 liest ages been carried on partly by way of the Persian Gulf, 
 and so by a tedious and dangerous journey across a large 
 portion of the continent of Asia, and partly by the course 
 of the Red Sea, and so through Egypt. The first discovery 
 of a passage to India by sailing round the Cape of Good 
 Hope was made by the Portuguese towards the end of 
 the fifteenth century of Christ. The comparative cheap- 
 ness, facility, and certainty of this new route of com- 
 munication between the ports of India and Europe, 
 entirely by sea, led to the abandonment of the ancient 
 courses of traffic. The Portuguese by seasonable presents 
 and successful negociations with some of the stronger states, 
 and by the terror of their arms and naval forces employed 
 against the weaker class of states, established in the course 
 of a hundred years settlements and factories, not only on 
 various parts of the Indian Coasts, but on many of the 
 Islands washed by the Indian seas, and even upon the shores 
 of China. Possessed of all these advantages, and undis- 
 turbed for many years in their prosperous career, they soon 
 formed the resolution of engrossing to themselves the whole 
 of that trade, by the first fruits of which they had become 
 enormously enriched. They prepared themselves at any 
 sacrifice of their wealth, by the utmost exertion of their in- 
 fluence with the various Native governments, and even by 
 open warfare, to crush all attempts by any other merchants 
 to open a course of commerce with any of those Eastern 
 territories with whom they had effected an intercourse —
 
 ORIGIN AND FORMATION OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY. Jgg 
 
 which attempts they presumptuously held to be an invasion 
 of their rights as the first discoverers. 
 
 Such was the state of things when, at the close of the 
 sixteenth century of Christ, many of the merchants of Eng- 
 land combined in the determination to contend for a share 
 in the lucrative trade with the East. It must be obvious 
 that any efforts of one, or of a few private individuals, to 
 open such a traffic must fail. The pre-occupancy by the 
 Portuguese of a trade which had been established at an im- 
 mense outlay of national funds, and which funds had been 
 increased to a vast amount through the gains of a hundred 
 years,'enabled them easily to undersell and ruin any such pri- 
 vate speculatists. It was also fully to be expected that, soon 
 or late, this right of trade must have to be contended for by- 
 force of arms. At the same time it was seen to be an object 
 of great national concern to the growth of the commercial 
 prosperity of England. It was felt to be a public reproach 
 that a nation, boasting itself as inferior to none in maritime 
 strength, should be excluded, at the will of one of the most 
 insignificant states of Europe, from any participation in a 
 trade which by nature lay open to all mankind. 
 
 The plain and the only method of engaging in this enter- 
 prise which, under the circumstances related, could justify 
 any confidence of success, was by the formation of a public 
 Company upon those principles and upon that plan of associ- 
 ation which has already been in some degree explained. It 
 was necessary that naval expeditions should be prepared on 
 such a scale as might promise some protection, if not secu- 
 rity, against violence— and at the same time might win 
 respect from the Native powers. It was necessary that the 
 value of the merchandize, and the amount of purchase 
 money, should be of such an extent as to attract the con- 
 sideration of the people with whom they proposed to open 
 a permanent commerce. Competent persons had to be en-
 
 130 
 
 ORIGIN AND FORMATION OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY. 
 
 gaged for the task of effecting negociations and treaties with 
 the Native powers. A large expenditure had to be provided 
 for in the purchase of land, the construction of warehouses, 
 factories and residences, and for a variety of other purposes, 
 needless to enumerate. The capital to be contributed for 
 objects of such magnitude and extent must necessarily be 
 large — the risk of failure manifest — but eventual success 
 would be shared by the whole nation, as well as by the ad- 
 venturers. All these considerations were sufficient to sus:- 
 gest, not only the organization of a great public Company, 
 with all those constitutional powers requisite for maintaining 
 its existence, its union, and good government — they sug- 
 gested, likewise, to the British Government the expediency 
 of giving peculiar encouragement to the undertaking by the 
 grant of extraordinary privileges and advantages. 
 
 It may be remembered that, when referring in the last, 
 discourse to those independent powers of the Crown 
 which are termed Prerogatives, mention was made of that 
 by which the reigning King or Queen regulates the conduct 
 of the national trade, It is chiefly with a view to the en- 
 couragement and regulations of commercial affairs that 
 the Crown has been used to exercise another 
 Prerogative power ; which, though distinct in itself, I 
 have thought it most convenient to notice in connection 
 with the subject of this present discourse ; and which consists 
 in the creation of those associated bodies, usually termed 
 Companies, but also named by the more general term of Cor- 
 porations, having perpetual existence by course of succession, 
 as vacancies arise, or by addition to their number according 
 to any scheme for the admission of new members. The docu- 
 ment by which the Crown creates this associated or corporate 
 Body, or Company, is called a Charter ; and the characteris- 
 tic qualities common to all public Chartered Companies 
 formed for the purposes of trade have been already 
 alluded to. It was formerly usual for the Crown, in grant-
 
 ORIGIN AND FORMATION OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY. | 3 |^ 
 
 ing Charters to these trading Companies, not merely to con- 
 cede to them the faculty of acting as if it was one individual, 
 with the same powers of making contracts, holding property, 
 suing in courts of law, and being responsible only through 
 its common property for debts and liabilities incurred, but it 
 was also customary for the Crown to grant to them the liberty 
 of exercising many of its royal powers, and many exclusive 
 privileges and advantages, which, however expedient, could 
 only be legally granted, according to the true constitutional 
 laws of the E lglish Government, by the authority of the 
 supreme legislature itself. It will be seen in the progress 
 of this discourse that, as the laws of the English constitu- 
 tion have become better settled and known, all the powers 
 and privileges of the East India Company were at length 
 sanctioned by the legislature itself in a series of Statutes. 
 But, at the time of the first formation of the Company, re- 
 course was had only to the authority of the then reigning 
 Queen of England, Elizabeth, who granted to them their 
 first Charter in the year of Christ 1600. 
 
 By this Charter all the merchants and adventurers, who 
 were willing to contribute such sums as might be agreed 
 to be received by the governing portion of such subscribers, 
 were declared to constitute a Corporation, or Company, with 
 all those inherent powers and qualities which have been 
 shewn to be the common characteristics of such associations. 
 They were to be governed by a governor and twenty-four 
 individuals, in this Charter called Committees but subse- 
 quently termed Directors, and who were to be chosen an- 
 nually by the subscribers, who have been since denominated 
 Proprietors. And, besides the grant of some exemptions from 
 the payment of duties on their exports from England, the 
 Charter conveyed the important privilege of a sole and ex- 
 elusive right of trading with all countries eastward of the 
 Cape of Good Hope. The association was named " The 
 " Goveruor and Company of Merchants of London trading
 
 132 ORIGIN AND FORMATION OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY. 
 
 " to the East Indies." The duration of the Company was, 
 however, limited to fifteen years, with a right of renewing 
 it for fifteen more with the consent of the Crown — and the 
 Crown at the same time was empowered to abolish the 
 Company at any lime upon giving two years' notice.
 
 SECTION IV. 
 
 Of the Progress of the East India Company, until they 
 became a Political Power. 
 
 Under the terms and privileges of the Charter of Eliza- 
 beth, often renewed by succeeding monarchs, the Company 
 continued to prosecute their trade for a course of sixty years. 
 They raised funds from time to time of various amounts, 
 which were managed sometimes as a common stock in a 
 joint trade, and sometimes as separate stocks of one or 
 more of the subscribers, and traded with on their separate 
 accounts. The voyages were made at no regular periods, and 
 the ventures of capital in each voyage were of the most va- 
 rious and uncertain amounts. Their successes, though often 
 clouded by reverses, were on the whole prosperous enough 
 to encourage their perseverance. Throughout this first 
 period of their trading, they were involved in continual war- 
 fare and contests, uot only with the Portuguese nation, but 
 also with the Dutch, who, with far more energy than the 
 Portuguese, engaged in such an extent of commerce, and 
 founded such numerous and extensive settlements, as at 
 one time threatened to overwhelm all competition for the 
 trade of the East. The Company had likewise to endure 
 many contests with rival traders and Companies of their 
 own countrymen, who prosecuted a trade in defiance of their 
 exclusive Chartered rights. In the result, however, the 
 commercial intercourse between England and India, through 
 the agency of the Company, was by the year of Christ 1660 
 fixed on a permanent basis, and no less than eight 
 Settlements or Factories had at that period been established 
 on various parts of the coast of India, governed by two 
 Boards, each consisting of a President and Council, who con-
 
 134 PROGRESS OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c. 
 
 ducked all the business required to be transacted in this 
 country. One of fh^se Boards was stationed at Surat; which, 
 under the permission of :he Mogul Emperor, was in the 
 year 161^, the first settlement founded by the English in 
 India. Under the presidency of this Board were placed 
 the Factories of Cambay, Ahmedabad, Gogo and Calicut. 
 Under the presidency of that ot Fort St George were placed 
 the Factories at Hooghly and Masulipatam. 
 
 But in 1681, through another Charter granted by King 
 Charles 2d, the Company became vested with further im- 
 portant powers. After confirming all former privileges, the 
 King granted them the authority to judge according to 
 the laws of England all persons living under thejn at 
 their Settlements, and to make war and peace with all 
 Native states. This was. in truth, to empower this Company 
 to found and govern Colonies in whatever parts of India 
 they might obtain any territory. I* ach settlement became, 
 as it were, a petty nation, over which the Company ruled 
 with regal authority ; and the whole of these settlements 
 acting in combination, and supported by the naval force 
 which the numerous vessels employed in carrying on the 
 trade could at all times supply, displayed a national strength 
 calculated at least to deter any hasty aggression by the 
 surrounding Chiefs, This local strength was very consider- 
 ably increased by the acquisition of the Island of Bombay, 
 which the same King, (to whom it was ceded by the Crown 
 of Portugal) granted in full property to the Company, 
 shortly after the gift of his Charter. 
 
 The objects of the Company, however, were still for 
 many subsequent years, solely confined to the prosecution of 
 their trade. As their powers became augmented, so also 
 did their knowledge in the most profitable methods of carry- 
 ing on their traffic improve. Greater union and greater 
 regularity marked their proceedings ; the number of mem-
 
 PROGRESS OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c. J 35 
 
 bers, and the amount of their subscriptions proportionably 
 increased. Their command of money enabled them to es- 
 tablish additional Factories and Settlements, as well as to 
 expend the dimensions of those they already possessed. 
 Pi i ley, Cossimbazar, and Balasore — and soon afterwards 
 Calcutta and Govindpore, in the interior of Bengal, and 
 Vizagapatam and Fort St. David on the eastern coast, 
 were added to their territorial possessions. Many of their 
 towns contained a numerous population of Natives and Eng* 
 lish, who were governed as subjects, and protected by the 
 erection of military fortifications. 
 
 In thus fixing themselves permanently within the 
 dominions of the Indian states, the Company doubt- 
 less had in view their independence and security 
 against the violence of the surrounding Native powers. 
 But, although the firm establishment of their commercial 
 intercourse, and the gradual augmentation of the trade by 
 which they were continually enriched, was for a long period 
 the sole principle which actuated these and all their 
 measures, nevertheless, in the progress of events, transac- 
 tions occurred which, perhaps unconsciously to themselves, 
 clothed the Company still further with a National and Sover- 
 eign character, and in reality placed them in the position 
 of one of the political states, among whom the territories 
 of India was divided. In the year 168.5 the Company, re- 
 senting many oppressions and wrongs which their servants 
 at their Factories in Bengal had endured at the hands of the 
 neighbouring Native powers, fitted out an armed fleet of 
 ten ships, with several hundred soldiers, and also a Kegi- 
 ment supplied by the King himself, for the purpose of venge- 
 ance and future security by force of arms. They 
 maintained a warlike struggle for many years with 
 their oppressors, and at length called down upon them- 
 selves the forces of the Mogul Emperor Aurungzebe himself, 
 who at first resolved on expelling the English altogether
 
 {36 PROGRESS OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, Sec. 
 
 from India. But so formidable were the military resources 
 of the Company, that, after much fighting and various for- 
 tunes, an amicable adjustment of all differences was effected, 
 and the Company were left in possession of all their acquired 
 territories. About the year 1G90 the Company resolved to 
 raise a revenue from the inhabitants, living under their go- 
 vernment — that being, as the Directors expressed them- 
 selves, " as much a subject of their care as their trade ; for 
 g by it they must maintain their forces , and make themselves 
 11 a nation in India." 
 
 We have now arrived at the end of the first century of 
 the Company's intercourse with India, at which period a 
 further and more important change was made in its Quality, 
 resources, and internal constitution ; and when such an im- 
 proved organization of its government was arranged, as ren- 
 dered it at length capable of those vast conquests, it was 
 eventually destined to achieve. Under this new organiza- 
 tion and settlement of its powers, it was enabled to main- 
 tain its rule over those large provinces it gradually brought 
 under subjection ; and under the same principles of its con- 
 stitution, modified in some details by subsequent Acts of 
 Parliament, it continues to direct and superintend the admi- 
 nistration of the British Empire in India to this day. This 
 change arose out of a circumstance which, at first, rather 
 threatened ruin to the Company than any addition to its 
 strength. 
 
 The people of England, according as the fundamental 
 rules of its political government came to be canvassed and 
 settled, saw that the exclusive privileges and sovereign pow. 
 ers granted to the Company by the sole authority of its 
 monarchs, and not by the supreme legislature, were incon- 
 sistent with the constitutional law of the land, and might 
 fairly be disputed by such as chose to make it their interest 
 so to do. These considerations led to the formation of a
 
 PROGRESS OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c- 1 37 
 
 powerful rival Company determined to claim their share of a 
 commerce, the extensive advantages of which, both commer- 
 cial and political, became continually more apparent, and in 
 which it. was commonly asserted that every Englishman had 
 an equal right to partake. This rival Company was establish- 
 ed under the express authority, and under the special regu- 
 lations, of a?i Act of Parliament ; which act authorized the 
 King to grant another Charter in conformity with its provi- 
 sions to the new Association. The Charter was in 1698 ac- 
 cordingly granted to them by King William the Third, under 
 the name of" The English Company trading to the East In- 
 dies" — (the old Company having been termed the London 
 Company) — and thus two Companies, with opposite interests, 
 and no small animosity against each other, engaged in the 
 same commercial field. The Charters of the old Company, 
 indeed, being limited in point of duration, would have short- 
 ly expired ; and thus the new Company trusted they might 
 have become relieved from their powerful competition. But 
 the old Company, being still in possession of so many valuable 
 settlements, and having influence enough to get their former 
 Charters partially renewed, still kept their ground. It was 
 soon seen how mutually prejudicial, if not ruinous, the con- 
 tests of two such Companies must prove; and, after some 
 years of warm discussion, an union of them was accomplish- 
 ed, under the new Charter lately granted to the English 
 Company ; and, as the grant of this Charter had been previ- 
 ously sanctioned by an express Act of Parliament, so, uipon 
 the union of the two Companies becoming completed) it 
 was afterwards confirmed in favour of both the Companies 
 united by the express sanction of another Act. Under 
 this new arrangement the Company surrendered all their 
 old Charters, and the two Companies took the one deno- 
 mination of " The United Company of the Merchants of 
 England trading to the East Indies." This continued 
 to be its legal and proper name, until (he passing of the last 
 statute for the regulation of the Company, and of the Go-
 
 J38 PROGRESS OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c. 
 
 vernment of India, in the year 1833, when its title was alter- 
 ed to that of" The East India Company." 
 
 This Charter of William 3rd, so sanctioned and subse- 
 quently confirmed by statute, was dated in the year 1698. 
 It granted (with many modifications, and in a more specific 
 and detailed form) to the new English Company similar 
 powers, and exclusive privileges, to those which had been 
 granted in the previous Charters of the old London Com- 
 pany. It ordained what persons might become members of 
 this Company under the name of Proprietors, and upon 
 what terms. It regulated by what body the whole affairs 
 "were to be managed, and the mode of their meeting and 
 course of transacting business. It regulated the qualifications 
 cf those Proprietors who were to be eligible as Directors. It 
 laid down the course of holding general assemblies for pur- 
 poses of elections, and for making ordinances and regula- 
 tions for general observance in the exercise of their powers 
 and functions. And, lastly, it laid down certain general 
 rules for the mode of conducting the government, and the 
 administration of justice, in India. I shall have occasion to 
 notice in greater detail some of the provisions of this Char- 
 ter, after referring to those later Statutes by which they 
 have been modified and extended, and when I come to ex- 
 plain the nature of those present existing powers, and that 
 settled plan of rule, by which the Company still superin- 
 tends and directs the course of government in India. In 
 the mean time we will pursue the history of the Com- 
 pany's progress. 
 
 Greatly as the Company's means were augmented by 
 the union of this numerous body of members, from whom a 
 capital stock was shortly raised, of upwards of three milli- 
 ons sterling (or three crores of Rupees) — greatly as their 
 political ambition might be supposed to be excited by the 
 consciousness of their own strength, by the assurance of
 
 PROGRESS OP THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c. J 39 
 
 every needful military assistance on the part of the English 
 Government, and by the firm security in which their ex- 
 tensive territorial possessions were held— t'ney still confined 
 their whole attention for the course of the next forty years, 
 to the prosecution of their commerce, satisfied with the 
 amount of annual dividends which their successful manage- 
 ment of it produced. About the year of Christ 1749, 
 however, unforeseen and apparently casual circumstances 
 (but such as the real condition of the people naturally gave 
 rise to), urged them upon that career of territorial conquest, 
 in which they found themselves unable, even though so in- 
 clined, to stop, until the mighty Empire of India was reduced 
 under their rule. In order that such a result may be ration- 
 ally understood, instead of its being the theme of ignorant 
 wonder, it will be useful to make some survey of the poli- 
 tical posture of the various states of India up to this period 
 as well as of the means and powers which on the other 
 hand sustained the Company throughout the contest.
 
 SECTION V. 
 
 Surrey of the Political Progress and Condition of the 
 
 A"ative States of India, previous to the Conquests of 
 
 the. East India Company, 
 
 Those who have examined with care all the genuine 
 materials of information, as regards the true condition of 
 the people of India in ancient times, and before its inva- 
 sion by the Moguls, and who have at the same time been 
 capable of drawing probable inferences from such inform- 
 ation, have been led to the conclusion that the whole 
 country has ever been the scene of internal wars and con- 
 vulsions . They have found no reason for supposing that 
 any considerable portion of the country ever long enjoyed 
 peaceful repose under a strong and just government ; and 
 still less are there traces of any settled plan of power, un- 
 der laws regularly framed, and as regularly observed. The 
 country seems to have been from the earliest times divided 
 into numerous petty states, which their several rulers go- 
 verned on no other principle than their arbitrary will. 
 Sufficient has been said in a former discourse, to shew that 
 little happiness, tranquillity, or security can be enjoyed 
 by any people in such a condition. 
 
 It is a plain proof of the correctness of this view of the 
 former condition of the people of India, that the first invasion 
 of IheMussulmenfrom the north- west,\vas repeated under the 
 same chief twelve times, and with scarce any other object 
 than devastation and plunder. Twelve times did Mahmoud 
 issue with his horde of undisciplined barbarians from Giiizni, 
 and the neighbouring cities —and, overcoming with ease
 
 SURVEY OF THE NATIVE STATES, &c. 141 
 
 every opposition, spread carnage and desolation over one 
 nation after another, down to the very shores of Guzerat. 
 
 From the period of these invasions, which occurred near 
 the year of Christ 1000, we may trace the gradual subjuga- 
 tion of one portion of India after another, to the yoke of 
 the Mussulman Emperors, till Aurungzebe, the most power- 
 ful, and perhaps, the most tyrannical and oppressive, of all 
 these conquering despots, finally, towards the year 1700, 
 extended his actual sway over most part of the country, 
 from north to south — ami rendered even those petty states 
 •which he spared the mere dependants on his favour 
 and protection. According to the course observed by his 
 predecessors, he appointed over numerous wide districts 
 masters who, in his name and as his deputies, ruled the 
 people at discretion —and whom he vainly hoped would be 
 kept, in subordination and obedience to his own supreme 
 authority, and that of his successors. These inferior mas- 
 ters, again, parcelled out portions of the territories con- 
 signed to their government to their own subordinates, 
 T\ho in the same manner were empowered to rule by 
 no other law than their own arbitrary will. Thus the 
 people of India were prostrated beneath a hundred petty 
 tyrants, most of whom derived their origin from foreign 
 lands. They all governed upon the same principal policy, 
 tlial of draining from the common toil of their subjects, those 
 resources which should maintain themselves in luxury and 
 splendour, and at the same time furnish them with the 
 means of engaging in revolts against their immediate su- 
 periors. 
 
 Throughout the progress of those seven centuries, down 
 to the reign of Aurungzebe, during which the Mussulman 
 invaders continued with various fortunes, to push their con- 
 quests in India, such had been the character of their sway, 
 and such the condition of the subjected people. They were
 
 J 42 SURVEY OF THE NATIVE STATES, &c. 
 
 o^en opposed, with more or less permanent success, by the 
 ancient Native states. The supreme authority of the Em- 
 peror, and the limits of his actual dominions, were often 
 reduced to narrow hounds, by the incursions of new foreign 
 invaders, or by the successful rebellion of powerful subjects. 
 No sooner had one great sovereign established by his vic- 
 tories, or his talents for government, an extensive and well 
 united dominion, then his death followed by domestic dis- 
 sensions, and violent competitions for his throne, again 
 threw the whole Empire into confusion. The chief officers 
 of the government divided into factions, each headed by a 
 competitor for the supreme power. The party eventually 
 prevailing in the struggle, usually owed his success to bloody 
 battles, spoliations, and extortion. Amidst such scenes na- 
 tional industry, the offspring of national security, and the 
 only parent of national wealth, can never thrive. It is true, 
 indeed, that the well-ordered governments of able and power- 
 ful Monarchs would sometimes create seasons of repose, and 
 with them the return of confidence, and a corresponding in- 
 crease of the general prosperity. But such seasons were but 
 temporary, and usually short, because not based on any set- 
 tled plan of power, which alone can impart firmness and per- 
 manency to political institutions. It is true that vast riches 
 and resources would be sometimes accumulated in the coffers 
 of the rulers, and sometimes be expended in the construction 
 of magnificent buildings, or in maintaining the splendour 
 and luxury of a royal palace. But these are no proofs 
 either of the political strength of a people, or of their happi- 
 ness. Such wealth may be the fruits of the forced labour 
 of those who can retain little for themselves. Such struc- 
 tures may be the work of groaning slaves. We must judge 
 of the power and the prosperity of a nation — not merely 
 from the personal grandeur of its ruler, or the stupendous 
 monuments he may build — but from the general diffusion of 
 wealth, and the enjoyments of life among the bulk of the 
 people, the security of property, the attachment of the in-
 
 SURVEY OF THE NATIVE STATES, &c. ]43 
 
 fluential men to the form of government under which they 
 live, and their sense of its benefits; and above all on the 
 spread of education and useful knowledge. » 
 
 From the death of Aurungzebe, in the year 1707, we may 
 date the gradual decay and dismemberment of the Empire 
 of the M guls. By the year 1749 (when the career of En- 
 glish Conquest began) the authority of the reigning Em- 
 peror was little more than nominal over the greater part of 
 India : and by the year 1770 he had become a mere tool at 
 the disposal of one or other of the various contending states 
 of India ; till at length, through the subsequent conquests of 
 the English, all his real authority as a ruler sunk, and was 
 extinguished for ever. The nominal title, however, is still 
 claimed by a descendant of the family, though no longer de- 
 ferred to by the actual successor to the imperial power — the 
 GovernorGeneral of India. The feeble-minded descendants 
 of Aurungzebe, involved in perpetual contests for mastery 
 over each other, could no longer control the ambition of 
 their subordinate chiefs, who seized on every such occasi- 
 on of weakness and dissension to assert, and secure, their 
 own independence. More concerned in seeking assistance 
 from them, than in punishing their rebellion, the competi- 
 tors for the imperial throne were obliged to connive at that 
 disregard of their authority, which they felt it impossible to 
 prevent. Amidst these struggles for dominion, this disunion 
 among the revolted rulers, and this breaking up of the Mus- 
 sulman Empire into separate states, those Hindoo nations 
 which had never been actually, or only partially, subdued, 
 found opportunities of rearing other distinct sovereignties, 
 and of claiming their own share in the general scramble 
 for territory. 
 
 The most conspicuous among these Native powers, was 
 that of the confederated Marhattas. It is beyond the scope 
 of this discourse to record the history of their origin and 
 extensive conquests. But it is material to notice that the
 
 |44 SURVEY OF THE NATIVE STATES, fee. 
 
 associated nation, more than any other body of people, con- 
 tributed to the downfall of the imperial power of the Moguls, 
 by a long series of successful invasions. Like the Mussul- 
 man Empire, however, which that of the Marhattas at one 
 time almost equalled in extent, this new state was soon 
 destined to fall asunder from the same unfailing causes. 
 Without any settled system of government, it never could 
 be held together in union and obedience. Every vacancy of 
 the supreme rulership led to intestine war. Every commander 
 of an army aimed at, and often succeeded in, establishing a 
 sovereignty for himself. At the period when the English 
 Company first entered into the list of Indian powers, the 
 Marhatta confederacy was already composed of several inde- 
 pendent states, acknowledging only a nominal master in the 
 person of the Peishwah at Poonah. And, although these 
 nations once more united their arms to oppose an Afghan 
 invader, they on that occasion, in the year 17G0, at Pan i put 
 near Delhi, sustained a defeat, the most memorable in the 
 annals of history for the dreadful amount of slaughter. 
 From that blow they never wholly recovered; but remain- 
 ing split into several separate states, each in its turn had 
 to sustain individually the shock of the approaching contest 
 
 with the English. 
 
 • 
 
 Such, then, was the posture of the various political pow- 
 ers of India, at the dawn of those events which ended in 
 the foundation of the British Empire in the east. Rivals 
 in ambition, rivals in interest, revengers of past oppressi- 
 ons, or claimants of lost authority, each state regarded its 
 neighbour as an immediate or a probable enemy. The 
 ruler of each nation having, in most instances, attained to 
 dominion either by domestic bloodshed, or by rebellion, 
 made it his first care to secure himself against the opposition 
 of his own subjects, and his next to aggrandize his original 
 dominions by the overthrow of surrounding countries. The 
 security of his own government, based on no fixed laws, 
 but solely upon arbitrary will, could only be maintained by
 
 SURVEY OF THE NATIVE STATES, &c. }45 
 
 enforcing the principle of all absolute governments — name- 
 ly, a fear calculated to produce universal and instant obe- 
 dience. The power of such rulers over thesT own subjects, 
 and their strength to resist or attack other states, depended 
 entirely on the amount of the labour and services of those 
 subjects which they could engross for their own objects, or 
 on the amount of wealth they could amass, through which 
 such labour and services, or those of others, were to be 
 purchased. Neither did they scruple to avail themselves 
 of any foreign assistance which chance or intrigues enabled 
 them to procure. When a state happens through these or 
 other means to have acquired a preponderating power and 
 extent of territory, resources of this nature may ensure 
 a temporary period of internal quiet, or of successful con- 
 quest. But such a course of government is nevertheless, 
 in itself, the source of national weakness. The people 
 having no cause for attachment to their government, im- 
 poverished by its exactions, and harassed by continual 
 strife, are always ready to fall off, and seek the protection 
 of new masters under whom they may hope to enjoy more 
 repose, and better security in their possessions. As the 
 whole authority of the state rests in the hands of one man, 
 the overthrow of that one man, and generally his defeat in 
 one battle, decides the fate of the nation. The assistance 
 of foreign powers can only be purchased by concessions, 
 which are calculated to raise an humble ally into a supe- 
 rior adversary. These sources of weakness bring on the 
 gradual decay and dismemberment of the mightiest Empire. 
 But when an extensive country has already become divided 
 into a great number of petty states, all labouring under the 
 same defective course of government, their mutual weakness 
 is likely, in the midst of perpetual and common disturbances, 
 to keep them all down to the same political level, till some 
 new power, stronger than any one of them singly, shall 
 become a competitor for general dominion.
 
 ]46 SURVEY OF THE NATIVE STATES, &e. 
 
 If, therefore, the nations of India had been left to them- 
 selves after this period of their fortunes, there is every pro- 
 bability that they would long have remained in the same 
 condition. Having regard to the submissive habits of the 
 people— the many ages of servitude in which they had ac- 
 quiesced, either under foreign masters or adventurous usurp- 
 ers — and to the absolute nature of their government — there 
 is no good reason for supposing that the internal strength of 
 any one of them was soon destined to improve by any dura- 
 ble augmentation of the national wealth, or by greater sta- 
 bility of the governments established. The Marhatta 
 states, which had become the most powerful, directed their 
 efforts more to the plunder, than to the permanent con,' 
 quest, of other territories, or the good managementof their 
 own. The Mussulman powers, sometimes banded against 
 one another, and sometimes against their common foes — 
 the Marhattas — each with difficulty preserved its own inde- 
 pendent existence, and continued to govern by the same 
 system which had failed to form a stedfast and united Em- 
 pire in the course of eight centuries of changeful domination. 
 The other states of India, either leaning upon each other 
 for their common safety, or rendering themselves subor- 
 dinate and tributary, first to one, and then to another, of their 
 more potent neighbours, as each in turn was considered best 
 capable of affording protection, maintained their own posi- 
 tion by thus adjusting, through their own weight, the balance 
 of power between hostile nations. Those countries border- 
 ing on India, which formerly sent forth the armies by which 
 it was so often devastated, and finally for the most part sub- 
 dued, had themselves become weakened by continual wars 
 and convulsions. But, whatever may have been, soon or 
 late, the political state of India, had these nations of the 
 East been .'eft to themselves, of this we may be certain— that 
 none of the existing forms of government nor any change 
 which conquests among one another could produce, would 
 ever raise the country from that condition which I have en-
 
 SURVEY OF THE NATIVE STATES, &c. ]47 
 
 deavoured to pouvtray. Such as had been the state of the 
 people from their earliest history under the same forms of 
 government, and under the yoke of conquerors who intro- 
 duced no better, such it is reasonable to conclude would ifc 
 have continued. 
 
 These conjectures upon the probable fate of India, in the 
 absence of any interference by European powers, may serve 
 to reconcile its people to those political vicissitudes which it 
 is the destiny of all the nations of the earth to undergo ; 
 and especially to such change as should introduce a settled 
 scheme of government, liberal institutions, and the blessings 
 of internal peace : but there can be no useful purpose in fur- 
 ther dwelling upon them. The time had arrived when, 
 circumstanced as the whole country was, it must of neces- 
 sity have become subject to one or other of the foreign con- 
 tending states, which had gained a firm footing on its soil.
 
 SECTION VI. 
 
 Of the Progressive Conquests of European Nations in 
 India, and the effects. 
 
 The Portuguese, and after them the Dutch, had, as we 
 have seen, for a long series of years kept up a formidable 
 resistance to the earliest attempts of the English to partici- 
 pate in the trade with India, which they had engrossed to 
 themselves. If through that naval strength, whiph both 
 these nations in their contests with each other were com- 
 pelled to maintain— through the vast capital they employed 
 in this profitable trade — through their numerous and con- 
 siderable territorial possessions — and through that influence 
 which all these advantages combined gave them amongst 
 the Native states — either of these European powers had 
 been enabled to crush the early efforts of the infant 
 English Company to establish their position in India, 
 it is impossible to assign limits to their probable pro- 
 gress towards Eastern dominion. That these resources 
 were sufficient to raise each of these two nations to 
 the rank of an independent power among the states of 
 India is no unreasonable presumption. The superiority of 
 their arts and arms, and the strenuous support of their 
 governments in Europe, were calculated to extend and 
 strengthen tbeir further acquisitions. But these were na- 
 tions altogether unequal to cope with the might of England. 
 Their advance was at once cut off as soon as political 
 superiority became the common cause of the English Com- 
 pany, and also of its government. In the mean time a 
 far more powerful competitor for the Indian sceptre than 
 either the Portuguese or the Dutch stept into the field.
 
 PROGRESSIVE CONQUESTS OF EUROPEAN NATIONS, &c. ]4Q 
 
 This was the French nation. France and England, the 
 two most considerable nations in Europe, had at this period 
 (1746) declared open war ; and it was not tong before these 
 distant regions of the East were destined to feel the effects 
 of their contention. A French Company, in imitation of 
 that of England, had with a similar view to trade possessed 
 itself of several settlements in India, all under the govern- 
 ment of a President and Council established at the then 
 strongly fortified town of Pondicherry. They also held the 
 islands of the Mauritius and Bourbon in the Indian Sea, 
 from whence they were enabled to obtain easy supplies, and 
 even to fit out vessels of war upon emergencies. In the 
 year 1746, by a sudden attack, for which the English were 
 unprepared, they had made themselves masters of Madras. 
 The Nabob of the Carnatic, whose assistance the English 
 had in their extremity sought and obtained, sent his son 
 with an army of ten thousand men for the purpose of re- 
 capturing that fortress from the hands of the French. The 
 French marched out to meet them with a body of four 
 hundred European soldiers only. To the utter astonish- 
 ment of the opposing host this small band of Frenchmen 
 gained a decisive victory ; and set the first example of the 
 vast proportionate superiority of disciplined European troops, 
 over Natives of less robust bodily frame, and altogether 
 unversed in the art*)f war. The French nation now openly 
 aimed at political supremacy in India. 
 
 An ambition of so magnificent a character, deliberately 
 formed, and acted upon by a few individuals at the head of 
 scarce fifteen hundred of their countrymen — settled in the 
 midst of numerous Native states, the weakest of which could 
 gather together an army of ten thousand men — may seem 
 presumptuous beyond all bounds of reason. Nevertheless 
 the history of events will shew that at least temporary 
 success must have attended this gigantic scheme of con- 
 quest, but for the opposition maintained by the English.
 
 150 PROGRESSIVE CONQUESTS OF EUROPEAN NATIONS, S:c. 
 
 The interests of the French in India were at this period 
 presided over by a succession of the most able men that 
 ever served a negligent and ungrateful country. By the 
 overthrow of the English at Madras, and by the discomfi- 
 ture of the forces of the Nabob of the Carnatic, the French 
 found themselves, relieved from the immediate pressure of 
 any enemy, and in possession of a territory inhabited by a 
 considerable and industrious population. Additional forces, 
 both naval and military, arrived — and their strength was 
 still further augmented by the formation of several com- 
 panies of Sepoys, whom the French were the first to train 
 according to the European rules of discipline. They now 
 commenced strenuously, and with confidence the apparently 
 easy task of wresting from the English the slencier hold 
 which, after the loss of Madras, they had upon any 
 portion of the Carnatic. At the same time they formed al- 
 liances, as well with a formidable competitor for the Nabob- 
 ship of the Carnatic, as with a still more powerful Prince, a 
 claimant for the Subadarship of the Deccan itself (of which 
 the Carnatic was but one of the dependencies)— and they 
 soon discovered that the might of their assistance decided 
 the possession of both the one throne and the other. In the 
 progress of these distractions, and of the bloody contests 
 they produced, the French gained such an ascendancy as 
 enabled them to set up and destroy one fuler after another, 
 as it suited their objects of increasing their own power : till 
 at length, in a grateful mood, one of the rival Subadarsof the 
 Deccan, who owed his elevation entirely to their interfer- 
 ence, constituted the French Governor chief of all the coun- 
 tries on the coast of Coromandel from the Kistna to Cape 
 Comorin, and appointed the Nabob of the Carnatic to be 
 his deputy. While the French were thus becoming mas- 
 ters of a wide tract of country, and Sovereign controllers 
 of the affairs of the whole Deccan, they were also gaining 
 ground, and strengthening their position in Bengal. It was 
 said without much appearance of exaggeration, that the 
 Emperor at Delhi would soon tremble at their name.
 
 PROGRESSIVE CONQUESTS OF EUROPEAN NATIONS, &c. ]^J 
 
 But all these grand designs were destined shortly to be 
 frustrated, and the French influence in India extinguished 
 for ever by the victorious successes of the Fmglish. It will 
 not, however, appear foreign to the subject of this discourse 
 if I cast a cursory glance at what would probably have been 
 the eventual fate of India, had any other European nation 
 but England attained that supreme power which was once 
 so nearly within the grasp of the French. 
 
 The Portuguese nation, one of the very feeblest of the 
 European powers, unable to subsist at all but by the pro- 
 tection of more powerful allies, and often on the very verge 
 of destruction by foreign enemies, it is certain could never 
 have retained but for a few years their hold upon such an 
 Empire, which chance might have placed under their go- 
 vernment. The Dutch, who with difficulty attained the 
 rank of an independent state in Europe, were themselves af- 
 terwards subjugated by the arms of the French. The 
 French after a series of wars which deluged all Europe in 
 blood, were twice utterly overthrown, and received their 
 political destinies at the will of their conquerors. 
 
 It is obvious, therefore, that, had it been the fortune of 
 either of these nations to have attained dominion over In- 
 dia, new wars and struggles must have devastated the coun- 
 try. After another age of national misery, tranquillity might 
 have been restored, and a new era of prosperity have begun, 
 by the firm foundation of such an Empire as the English 
 have now established, or on the other hand, the country might 
 have been resigned again to that state of universal disunion 
 and misgovernment which from ancient times had prevailed.
 
 SECTION VII. 
 
 Of the Means and Resources of the East India Company 
 for the conquest of India. 
 
 It was at this crisis of the highest political fortunes of 
 the French, that the English Company — first, in compul- 
 sory resistance of attacks which threatened their utter ruin 
 and expulsion from India, and afterwards from the force of 
 circumstances — began in the year of Christ 1749 tp engage 
 openly in that contest for territorial dominion which ended 
 in their settled supremacy. Having surveyed the posture 
 of the various Native states, and the feeble condition or de- 
 pendency to which most of them were reduced and the qua- 
 lity as well as extent, of that power and influence which 
 the French had built up — let us turn to examine what 
 were the means and resources which supported the Company 
 through the arduous career upon which they were about to 
 enter. 
 
 From the year 1698, the date of that Charter, the provisi- 
 ons of which I have in a general way alftady rehearsed, to 
 the period which I am now alluding to, no addition had been 
 made, either by the legislature or by any Royal grant, to the 
 powers and privileges of the Company, nor any alteration 
 in those already conferred. The Government of England 
 was content with renewing from time to time their Charter 
 rights for further terms of years, providing at the same time 
 for the more secure enjoyment of their exclusive trade. 
 The King interfered by his own Prerogative no farther than 
 by regulating the course of administering justice at the 
 three Presidencies, which were now those of Madras, Bom- 
 bay and Calcutta. A treaty of peace, however, had been
 
 RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &e, I53 
 
 arranged in 1749 in Europe between France and England, 
 under one of the stipulations of which Madras was restored 
 to the English Company. 
 
 In the meantime the Company had, by their own previous 
 negociations with the Native powers, obtained no less than 
 thirty. seven towns in the neighbourhood of Calcutta, and 
 added three villages to their possessions at Madras. At 
 each of these settlements they maintained a garrison of about 
 300 European soldiers ; and it may be presumed that no less 
 a force was kept up at some other stations. At Cuddalore, 
 including the adjacent fortified town called Fort Saint 
 David, they had acquired a territory still more extensive 
 and populous than their settlement of Madras. Their ca- 
 pital stock subscribed by the Proprietors amounted to near 
 three millions sterling, as we have seen — and, such was 
 the prosperous course of their trade, that they not only were 
 able to pay annually dividends to the amount of eight per 
 cent to the Proprietors of stock, but they had credit to bor- 
 row no less a sum than six millions sterling, on which they 
 paid regular annual interest. With this command of money 
 they had in a long course of years erected numerous and 
 strong fortifications, and supplied them with extensive war- 
 like stores ; they had maintained, and continued to enlist in 
 their service, bodies of English troops and naval armaments ; 
 and they had increased their territory from time to time by 
 purchases, until from their landed possessions alone, they 
 derived a revenue large enough to sustain the expences of 
 administering a local government, which will be shewn to 
 have been at this period of no inconsiderable importance. 
 
 The population of the English settlement of Madras, 
 amounted at this time to about 250,000 souls. That at 
 Cuddalore could not be reckoned at less : and, besides these 
 settlements, the several others under the Madras Presiden- 
 cy may be presumed to have contained many thousands.
 
 ]54 RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, Sec. 
 
 The population under the government of the Bengal Presi- 
 dency, a more fertile, and a more extensive district than 
 that of Madras, would surely surpass the number we have 
 assigned to the latter Presidency. The Island of Bombay, 
 together with the adjacent island of Salsette, has never been 
 supposed to contain a less population than 300,000 ; and the 
 English settlements at Surat and at other places on the wes- 
 tern coast, would contribute materially to swell the whole 
 amount of the Native subjects of the Company. They might 
 probably be reckoned at between one million and fifteen 
 hundred thousand souls. 
 
 The power of the Company by 3ea had come to be of the 
 most formidable character. In their first contests with the 
 French, and before a step had been taken in hostility with 
 the Native states, no less than from fifteen to seventeen 
 vessels of war, some of them of the largest class, besides 
 eleven vessels for the transport of troops, appeared at one 
 time in the Indian seas. Some of these vessels, with their 
 officers and crew, were in the regular pay of the Company; 
 some were supplied by the King with a view to the glory 
 of the nation and victory over its principal foe. Such a 
 force was alone sufficient, if well conducted, to sweep the 
 ocean of every antagonist, and to pour the tide of conquest 
 upon any state in India it might attack. 
 
 But all the resources which the Company could command, 
 sunk in importance when compared with that constant and 
 resolute support which the government of England was it- 
 self invariably ready to furnish in a cause which was seen 
 so much to concern the national interests. It was no longer 
 the cause of a trading Company struggling for profits, 
 which were more or less to enrich two or three thousand 
 British subjects. '1 he question of pursuing the English con- 
 quests in India was one which was to decide whether Eng- 
 land should become one of the greatest Empires on the
 
 RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY. &c. [55 
 
 earlb, or whether it was to yield in political power to some 
 other nation, even at the possible loss of its own independ- 
 ence. From the beginning, therefore, of these vast conten- 
 tions to their close, the Royal army of England continued, as 
 occasion demanded, to send forth its warriors. " I see," said 
 the tyrant of Mysore, " those who are before me, and I 
 " fear them not : it is that power which I cannot see of 
 " which I stand in awe." The daring exploits performed 
 by the great generals and officers of the Company rendered 
 it unnecessary that the military might of England should 
 have been more than very partially put forth : but the con- 
 sciousness of fhei) country's cause, and not that of private 
 individuals merely, nerved the soldiers' arm, and inspired 
 the statesman's deliberations, with augmented energy. The 
 Company strove for themselves ; but it was as representatives 
 also of the English nation, and with a nation's strength. 
 
 Such were the means with which the Company commenc- 
 ed their contest for dominion in India. They were the 
 means, not of a body of merchants, but of a powerful 
 and populous colony, firmly settled, and politically governed 
 as a nation. The rulers over it were wealthy in themselves, 
 but wealthier in the financial support of their government. 
 Their means were not easily to be exhausted by reverses ; 
 and they were necessarily increased by success. Their 
 power was not like that of the French Company, who were 
 feebly sustained by their own Government, and had but 
 little capital to fall back upon. The power of the French, 
 therefore, as it was originally founded upon intrigues with 
 the Native states, so also did its progress depend chiefly on 
 personal influence, and not on any substantial political 
 strength. They could be no match in the long run for an 
 enterprising and persevering enemy like the English ; though 
 it soon became obvious that supremacy in India would be 
 decided by the superiority of one or the other of these two 
 nations.
 
 156 RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c 
 
 During those first great successes of the French which I 
 have noticed, the Government of Madras was occupied in 
 gaining some small accession to their territories. But the 
 overwhelming authority with which the Subahdar of the Dec- 
 can had invested the French Government at once revealed 
 to the Company that either their own extinction, or that of 
 the French, as a political power in India, had now to be de- 
 termined by the sword. In this conviction the Company 
 first began to strengthen themselves by espousing the claim 
 of another competitor for the throne of the Carnatic, who, 
 besides the possession of the fort of Trichinopoly, maintained 
 a considerable army in the field. The price of this alli- 
 ance was a grant by the rival Nabob to the English Com- 
 pany of the Jaghire of Madras. The French, somewhat in- 
 ferior in European forces, acted with a far superior Native 
 army, under the banners of their own Nabob. The contest 
 was nominally between these two Princes, but in reality be- 
 tween the two European states. After a war of five years' 
 duration, in the course of which many hard battles were 
 fought, and some of the most astonishing feats of bravery 
 were displayed that ever adorned the military annals of a 
 nation, all the objects of the French ended in defeat. Their 
 Nabob was made captive and slain. The authority of his 
 rival was permanently established. The possessions of the 
 Company, with the addition of the recently granted Jaghire, 
 were confirmed. Those of the French were reduced within 
 their original limits : and the predominating influence of 
 the English prevailed over the whole extent of India south 
 of the Kistna. - 
 
 A far more extensive scene of conquest now opened to 
 the enterprise of the Company. Their settlements in 
 Bengal were wantonly invaded by the Subahdar of the pro- 
 vinces of Bengal, Behar, and Orissa, to whose immedi- 
 ate government these settlements were politically subordi- 
 nate. His sole motive was his rapacity ; but his barbarous
 
 RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c. \ 57 
 
 cruelty threw all other atrocity into the shade. Calcutta 
 was stormed, and given up to plunder — and 146 defenceless 
 English prisoners were on the evening of the assault shut 
 up in a small dungeon, and, before morning, all but 23 
 expired of suffocation, the necessary consequence of this 
 inhuman treatment. But this memorable murder of the 
 Black Hole of Calcutta, was the cause of still more memo- 
 rable results. The just vengeance of the English in India 
 was roused. They collected all their forces under Clive, 
 the most daring soldier and the ablest general of his age. 
 They gave battle, with 900 Europeans and 2,200 Native 
 troops, to the host of the Subahdar, amounting to near 
 70,000 men, and in the famous plain of Plassy utterly rout- 
 ed this mighty army. The consequences of such defeat 
 were the dethronement and death of this Prince, and the 
 eventual reduction of his dominions under the English sway. 
 
 As will be presumed, this vast accession of power, toge- 
 ther with the treasures which thereby fell to the disposal 
 of the Company, soon led to the destruction of the rival 
 authority of the French. With such means as they still 
 possessed — aided by the co-operation of some Native states 
 over whom they still had influence, and directed by the 
 talents of many very able men — they protracted the vital 
 contest through a constant warfare of four years after the 
 victory of Plassy. But a series of bloody defeats ended 
 in the siege and capture of Pondicherry, the seat of their 
 government, and their last strong hold in India. From 
 this final discomfiture in 1761, they never recovered; and 
 the English Company were thereafter left to pursue their 
 fortunes in India, free from all armed interruption, or the 
 apprehension of it, by any foreign nation. 
 
 We have now traced the history and progress of the 
 East India Company from its first formation to the period
 
 J^S RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, See, 
 
 when it had acquired the consistency and rank of one of 
 the most powerful and influential among the Eastern states. 
 The limited obje u ct of this portion of my discourse being 
 but to shew the capacity of this extraordinary political 
 body to construct that vast Empire now under its settled 
 Government — and which capacity the gradual acquisition 
 of the position they had now attained, by the course I have 
 attempted to explain, will rationally account for — [ shall 
 here close that discussion which more properly befits the 
 historian. For sixty more years the Company and its 
 Governments were engaged in extensive warfare with Native 
 powers : but it is their boast that throughout these conten- 
 tions they have never been the aggressors ; that they have 
 never made war for the sake of unrighteous conquests ; that 
 they have never broken the faith of treaties. If, under that 
 providence by whose control Empires rise and fall, 
 flourish and decay, this wide country has in the course 
 of so many vicissitudes been at leng'h subjected to 
 English Government, that government has never lost 
 sight of the paramount duty of governing for the benefit 
 of the people. It was no idle spirit of display which 
 induced the House of Commons, after a laborious inves- 
 tigation of every detail in the conduct of the Indian 
 Governments, to record their solemn testimony to " the 
 " unremitting anxiety that has influenced the efforts of 
 "those to whom the Government of our Indian possessions 
 " has been consigned, to establish a system of administra- 
 " tion best calculated to promote the confidence and con- 
 " ciliate the feelings of the Native inhabitants, not less by 
 " a respect to their own institutions than by the endeavour 
 " gradually to engraft upon them such improvements as 
 <: might shield, under the safeguard of equal law, every 
 " class of the people from the oppressions of power, and 
 " communicate to them that sense of protection and assur- 
 " ance of justice, which is the efficient spring of all public 
 " prosperity and happiness. "
 
 RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &C. J 59 
 
 While through the lapse of 70 years, from the year 1749 
 to the year 1820, (he English Empire of India was being 
 gained and consolidated, the legislature of England kept 
 pace with its progress by its enactments for the better re- 
 gulation of the Company and of the authority which it ex- 
 ercised. Up to the year 1773, the Company continued to 
 conduct its affairs upon the basis of the Charter of 1698, as 
 it had done up to the year 1749 when its career of conquest 
 began. But, in the year 1773, a regulating Statute introduced 
 many alterations of detail both in the internal constitution of 
 the Company, and its method of governing the extensive 
 countries it had acquired. This act was followed by others — 
 the chief of which were one in 1784, first constituting a 
 Board of Commissioners for the Affairs of India (commonly 
 called the Board of Control)— and by three more, usually de- 
 nominated Charter Jets, by which in the years 1793, 1813, 
 and 1833, the Government of India by the East India Com- 
 pany was delegated to that body for the respective periods 
 of 20 years by each act. All these acts, except the two 
 last, continued to the Company their exclusive privileges of 
 trade, but the act of 1813 first allowed a free and general 
 participation in it by British public ; and the last act of 1S33 
 abolished the right of trade by the East India Company 
 altogether. 
 
 Such a revolution in the essential quality of the Company 
 may seem to require some explanation. It must be ob- 
 served that this body, from the time that it had become a 
 ruling power over a populous and extensive Empire, acted 
 in two capacities, each of which was in its nature totally 
 distinct from the other. It was quite as competent to the 
 British Parliament (and indeed this was at one time in its 
 contemplation) to have constituted another entirely new 
 Board of Governors to conduct the government of India, as 
 to leave that authority in the hands of u Company of mer- 
 chants, who made it equally their business to carry on their
 
 15Q RESOURCES OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY, &c. 
 
 trade. That this government was still continued in the 
 hands of the Company was owing merely to considerations 
 of policy, and te a conviction that the success and justice of 
 its administration rendered that measure most expedient. 
 The same policy had suggested the continuance of the ex- 
 clusive privileges of trade, the expediency of which was sup- 
 ported on two grounds— first, that of contributing by the 
 profits to the better maintenance of their growing political 
 power; secondly, that of preventing a sudden influx of Eng- 
 lishmen, who with their free legal rights and love of 
 enterprise, might probably embarrass a new and unsettled 
 government, and at the same time lead to the oppression of 
 the Natives. But in 1813, when the English sway in India 
 was more firmly fixed — wh»n equal laws had begun to be 
 regularly administered — and the Native people had become 
 more sensible of the true advantages of the British rule—* 
 these precautions were swept away with the most benefi- 
 cial results to the public commerce of both countries. From 
 this period the trade of the Company, like the trading of 
 all Governments in competition with that of the public, 
 not only dwindled gradually away, but was proved to be car- 
 ried on at a manifest loss. The abolition, therefore, of all 
 further trading by the governing body was a relief to the 
 public, who gained consequently a greater share of the 
 traffic. It was also a financial benefit to the Company 
 itself, and a disincumbrance of a branch of affairs which 
 detrimentally interfered with their more important duties, 
 as a Government.
 
 SECTION VIII. 
 
 Of the Component Members of the East India Com- 
 pan. y— the Proprietors of Slock. 
 
 We must now consider the East India Company as a body 
 temporally organized by the sovereign authority ot the 
 English nation, for the responsible government of an im- 
 mense component portion of the whole undivided British 
 Empire. This powerful body may be said to consist of the 
 Proprietors of India Stock — (who may be properly deemed 
 to constitute the aggregate Company) — the Directors, who 
 being themselves Proprietors are by delegation of the whole 
 mass appointed to manage and superintend its affairs, as 
 their Representatives— and the Board of Control, which in 
 the name of the King's executive authority exercises an 
 appellate, and to some extent a directory, power of inter- 
 ference. The functions and duties of each of these bodies 
 are copiously detailed in the Acts to which 1 have referred. 
 'J bose of the Proprietors will occupy the remainder of this 
 discourse. Those of the Directors, aod of the Board of 
 Control— who, together, constitute the supreme government 
 of India, acting through the Governors and Council at each 
 Presidency as their ministers— will form the subject of the 
 next. 
 
 It will be convenient fo consider of the qualifications and 
 functions of the Proprietors, as extracted from all the regu- 
 lating Charters and Statutes, under three heads— 1st, the 
 mode of tluir becoming Proprietors ; 2ndly, the course by 
 which they act ; and 3rdly, the powers with which this 
 body is invested. 
 
 I. The original objects of the Company having been
 
 Jg2 0F THE PROPRIETORS OF STOCK. 
 
 purely commercial, no restrictions were imposed on the capa- 
 city of every person to purchase shares in the common stock, 
 and thereby to'become a member of the Company as a 
 Proprietor. Although the altered character of the Company 
 might have warranted a change in the qualifications of its 
 members, yet, owing to the very limited powers exercised 
 by the Proprietors at large, it has never been deemed re- 
 quisite to resort to any such measure. All persons whatever, 
 who are of the age of 21 years, whether foreigners or natural 
 born subjects of England, and without distinction of religion, 
 profession, or even sex, are competent to become Proprie- 
 tors by the purchase of a share or shares in the capital 
 stock of the Company, which shares are saleable and trans- 
 ferable like any other property. This stock, which, as we 
 have seen, was formerly the capital on which dividends 
 were made on profits of trade, is now converted into a right 
 to a certain amount of the surplus revenues of the Indian 
 Empire, after all expences of its administration are defrayed. 
 At the end of the term of 20 years, for which period the go- 
 vernment of India is further entrusted to the Company by 
 the last Charter Act of 1833, the Government of India may 
 finally become a portion of the general government of the 
 whole British Empire, and the stock of the Company, agreed 
 to be reckoned at twelve millions sterling, is to become a 
 charge on that general government. 
 
 A Proprietor of shares to a less amount than 1000£, 
 though a member of the Company in some sense, is not 
 clothed with any of the administrative powers of a Propri- 
 etor. If the owner of 500£ stock, he may be present at 
 the meetings (or General Courts as those meetings are 
 called) of Proprietors assembled for the transaction of 
 business, although he cannot vote. A Proprietor under the 
 age of 21 years, to whom any amount of stock may have 
 devolved by inheritance, by bequest, or by marriage, can 
 exercise none of his functions as such, until he becomes of
 
 GENERAL COURTS OF PROPRIETORS OF STOCK. J 53 
 
 that age. A Proprietor of 1000£ stock has one vote at all 
 elections to be made, and upon all questions to be decided, 
 at the Courts of Proprietors : a Proprietor of 3000£ stock 
 has two votes : a Proprietor of 6000£ has three votes : 
 and a Proprietor of I0,000£ has four votes. No Proprie- 
 tor can have more than four votes, whatever may be the 
 amount of stock held by him. With a view to the preven- 
 tion of combination to serve immediate occasions, no Pro- 
 prietor is allowed to vote, unless he has been truly and 
 really possessed of the requisite amount of stock for one 
 whole year ; except in the instances of such stock devolv- 
 ing by course of inheritance, or by bequest, or through 
 marriage. 
 
 IT. — All proceedings of the Proprietors are transacted by 
 General Courts ; at which the votes of a majority present 
 decide ; or at which a demand may be made by any nine 
 Proprietors of an adjournment for the purpose of taking 
 the personal votes of all duly qualified members who desire 
 to attend and vote, — whereupon the majority of votes so 
 taken decides. 
 
 These general Courts are summoned by the Directors, 
 who may assemble them as often as they shall see cause, 
 and who must assemble them at least four times in each 
 year ; namely, one in the month of December, another in 
 March, another in June, and another in September. Should 
 the Directors, or a majority of them, fail in so summoning 
 any of these Courts, any three Directors may call together 
 a Court in the next ensuing month. And, further, any 
 nine of the Proprietors holding 1000£ stock may require, 
 by a special demand, that a Court shall be summoned by 
 the Directors within ten days. 
 
 When any demand is regularly made for taking the 
 votes of the Proprietors, generally, on any question, or
 
 jg4 POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF PROPRIETORS OF STOCK. 
 
 when any election is to be made, the method of giving in 
 and recording votes is by what is termed the Ballot. By 
 that course each voter delivers in a paper containing his 
 simple assent or dissent to any measure proposed, or the 
 name of the candidate or candidates for whom he gives 
 his suffrage ; depositing the paper in one of several large 
 glasses. Certain Directors are appointed by the Court to 
 receive the votes into the glasses, and others to count out 
 the votes and report the result. No balloting nan com- 
 mence at any earlier period than 24 hours after the ad- 
 journment of the Court for the purpose of a ballot being 
 taken ; nor can the ballot commence before noon, or be 
 closed before six o'clock of the same day. The Court be- 
 fore separating adjourn to some day which it fixes as the 
 day for balloting. By the last Charter Act of 1833. Proprie- 
 tors are allowed to vote at Elections by their attornies pro- 
 ducing a duly executed authority. 
 
 III. — The powers of the Proprietors are as follows : 1st. 
 They form the constituent body out of whom the managing 
 body, the Directors, are elected. As by the constitution 
 of the Court of Directors six of its members must vacate 
 their office every year, there must be an annual election, 
 which is appointed for the second Wednesday of April, at 
 which each Proprietor may give in his list of names of 
 candidates not exceeding six. Every other vacancy, occur- 
 ring by death, retirement, or removal, must be filled up 
 within forty days after the vacancy declared ; and ten days 
 notice must be given by the Court of Directors of the day 
 appointed for the election. The Proprietors have also the 
 power of removing any Director from his office for just 
 cause. — 2nd. The Court of Proprietors is authorized to 
 make regulations (termed Bye-laivs,) as well with a view to 
 the actual government of India, and of the Company's 
 affairs generally, as with a view to the course and method of 
 conducting business by the Court of Directors, and to the
 
 POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF PROPRIETORS OF STOCK. Jg^ 
 
 proper demeanour of the individual Directors in the exer- 
 cise of their offices. This power of making bye-laws would, 
 therefore, on the face of it imply a suprenje and practical 
 authority in administering the affairs of the Company. In 
 reality, however, it has no such effect. In the first 
 place it gives no authority to make any regulation con- 
 trary to any provision of a Statute ; and, since almost all 
 the powers and authorities exercised by the Company are 
 regulated by Statute, very little scope for discretionary legis- 
 lation by this privilege remains. In the next place, these 
 Statutes, having not only placed the entire administration of 
 all matters relating to the Civil or Military Government, or 
 to the Revenue of India, in the Court of Directors, but hav- 
 ing also forbidden the revocation, suspension, or varying of 
 any of this Court's orders relating to these subjects by any 
 general Court of Proprietors,their practical authority is there- 
 by almost nullified. And, lastly, so cumbrous a mode of 
 executing the functions of a government, as this of pro- 
 posing general laws, which would be sure to be opposed by 
 the whole influence of the Directors, if aimed at the defeat 
 of their measures, would never become efficient, even if any 
 Proprietors couid be found troublesome enough to attempt 
 it. Nevertheless, this legislative authority is not without 
 some practical and beneficial objects. By it the orderly 
 course of transacting the business of the general Courts is 
 provided ; and a considerable power is still thereby retained 
 in regard to the disposal of any portion of the revenues of the 
 Company : insomuch that no sum beyond G00£ can at 
 any time be voted by the Court of Directors by way of gra- 
 tuity to any person, nor more than 200£ per annum by way of 
 pension, or salary of anew office, unless with the sanction of 
 two general Courts of Proprietors. — 3rd. The Court of Pro- 
 prietors are empowered to take into their consideration all 
 new proposed Statutes, affecting the interests of the Company, 
 and to discuss the merits of such laws, and to offer in the 
 name of the whole Company, as well to Parliament as to the
 
 166 
 
 POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF PROPRIETORS OF STOCK. 
 
 Court of Directors, the opinions resolved on by the majority 
 of a Court. In like manner this Court is empowered to 
 call for information on any topics connected with the ad- 
 ministration of affairs by the Court of Directors, and to pass 
 resolutions of censure or approbation upon their measures, 
 or to suggest others ; although not competent to enforce 
 the execution of the measures so suggested. With the 
 same view to the public expression of the opinion of the 
 body of Proprietors on the mode of administration of the 
 Government by the Court of Directors, that Court is re- 
 quired to lay before the General Courts of Proprietors an 
 annual account of the finances of the Company. It is in 
 the exercise of this branch of their functions, and in the 
 duty of elections, that the General Court of Proprietors is 
 mainly engaged. 
 
 Upon a review of all these powers and functions of the 
 body of Proprietors its true usefulness will appear to consist 
 in its constituting a fair, an enlightened, and at the same 
 time a popular, source of power, upon a s v. stem of repre- 
 sentation ; and in its supplying a solemn check on the 
 conduct and measures pursued by those to whom the im- 
 portant executive duties of governing the vast East Indian 
 Empire is entrusted.
 
 DISCOURSE IV. 
 
 Of the Court of Directors, and Board of 
 
 Control. 
 
 o 
 
 F the Qualifications of the Individual Directors. Of 
 the course by ichich the Directors act as a Court. Of the 
 Powers' of the Court of Directors. Of the Board of 
 Control.
 
 DISCOURSE IV. 
 
 Of the Court of Directors, and Board of 
 
 Control. 
 
 SECTION I. 
 
 Of the qualifications of individual Directors. 
 
 M PROPOSE to treat of the constitution and quality of 
 the Court of Directors under three several heads — First, the 
 qualifications of the individual Directors, and the mode of 
 their election : Second, the course in which they exercise 
 their functions : Third, the powers with which the Court of 
 Directors is invested. 
 
 First. Every person, to be eligible as a Director, must 
 be a Proprietor of stock to the amount of 2000£, at least. 
 This amount of the pecuniary qualification of a Director 
 was first fixed by the Charter of 1G98. 
 
 No Proprietors but such as are English subjects can be 
 elected Directors. Every person born within any part of 
 the dominions of the Crown of England is by his birth-right 
 an English subject : consequently, every Native born within 
 the territories of India under British Government is eligible 
 as a Director, provided he is otherwise qualified. So also 
 any foreigner may become entitled to all the rights of an 
 Englishman, by being what is termed naturalized (that is 
 having the rights of a natural born subject conferred upon 
 him; by Act of Parliament. This qualification of being an
 
 ]70 QUALIFICATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. 
 
 English subject, is not required in Proprietors ; but the 
 Directors, being invested with extensive political powers of 
 a national character, ought obviously to be under the obli- 
 gation of every public duty and feeling to uphold the national 
 interests. 
 
 No person who has held office in India, and who shall 
 have been declared by the Court of Directors to have pecu- 
 niary accounts unsettled with the Company, or against whom 
 that Court shall have declared that a charge for misconduct 
 is under consideration, is eligible to be a Director for the 
 term of two years after his return to England, unless those 
 accounts be sooner settled, or such charge sooner decided. 
 
 Every Director is required to take an oath of office within 
 ten days after his election, before certain appointed authori- 
 ties, otherwise his election becomes void. The oath is of 
 an impressive character, and is to the following effect : 
 
 The Director swears to his being duly and truly qualified 
 in respect to the amount of stock owned by him : he swears 
 that, in case he is in any way interested in any dealings, con- 
 tracts, or purchases, made by or with the Company, he will 
 record the same previous to the discussion or the making of 
 any treaty or negociation upon any subject, connected with 
 such dealings, and withdraw, without giving any vote : he 
 then proceeds to swear, ' f that he will not, directly or indi- 
 " reetly, accept or take any perquisite, emolument, fee, pre- 
 " sent, or reward, upon any account whatsoever (or any 
 " promise or engagement for any) for or in respect of the ap- 
 " pointment, or nomination, of any person to any place or 
 " office in the gift, of the Company, or of himself as a Direc- 
 '• tor, or for or on account of, or any ways relating to, any 
 " other business or affairs of the Company :" he further 
 swears, " that he will be faithful to the Company, and, ac- 
 " cording to the best of his skill and understanding, give
 
 QUALIFICATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. \J\ 
 
 * f his best advice, counsel, and assistance for the support of 
 " the good government of the Company :" and, lastly, he 
 swears <e that in the office of a Director* of the Compa- 
 " ny he will be indifferent and equal to all manner of per- 
 " sons, and will in all things faithfully and honestly demean 
 " himself, according to the best of his skill and understand- 
 " ing." 
 
 Every Director, going beyond sea from England, must 
 report to the Court such his intention ; and, in case he con- 
 tinues absent more than one year, the Court, of Directors 
 must report his absence to the next General Court of Pro- 
 prietors ; who may, if they think fit, thereupon remove him ' 
 from his office. This General Court has likewise power to 
 remove (if they think fit) any Director who shall take any 
 office of emolument under the King's government. And, 
 further, any Director may be displaced by the proceedings of 
 two General Courts ; at the first of which the grounds of 
 the motion for removal must be brought forward and re- 
 corded, and at the second of which the question for removal 
 is to be decided by the votes of the Proprietors then pre- 
 sent. All these liabilities to removal are created by the 
 Bye-laus of the Company, passed by the General Courts 
 of the Proprietors. 
 
 The number of Directors is twenty four. Until the year 
 1773 all these Directors were chosen annunlhj : but in that 
 year a Statute provided that six only of the Directors 
 should go out of office every year by rotation : consequently, 
 no Director can serve for a longer period than four years. 
 There must necessarily, therefore, be an annual election of 
 six Directors in the room of those who go out by rotation ; 
 which election is appointed to take place on the second 
 Wednesday of every April. Previously to that day two 
 lists are printed of all Proprietors entitled to vole: one list 
 is to be ready to be delivered to any Proprietor demanding
 
 J72 QUALIFICATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. 
 
 it five months before the day of the annual election ; and 
 the other list, which must comprehend all Proprietors who 
 have become such since the delivery of the last list, is to 
 be ready fourteen days before the election. Every candi- 
 date must signify in writing to the Secretary of the Court 
 his desire to become such, thirty-two days before the day 
 of election ; and a list of all the candidates is published 
 thirty days before the election. The mode of balloting for 
 these annual candidates, and for others, as individual va- 
 cancies occur, has been explained in the last discourse. 
 When an individual vacancy occurs, not in the course of 
 annual rotation, the candidate elected in his place can only 
 serve for the remainder of the period which his predeces- 
 sor had to serve. Such a vacancy, when it occurs, must 
 be published by the Court — a day for electing another to 
 the office must be fixed within forty days of such declara- 
 tion of the vacancy — and ten days public notice of the day 
 of election must be given. 
 
 There is no restriction, however,against the same Directors 
 who have gone out by rotation becoming candidates to 
 succeed to the next annual vacancies — and, in practice, 
 they always do become so, unless they choose voluntarily 
 to retire from office. For experience having shewn the 
 advantage of retaining the services of those who have 
 previously become versed in the affairs of the Company, 
 and who may at the time of their turn for vacating have 
 become engaged in originating or carrying into effect some 
 important measures, it proved an obvious policy to re-elect 
 such Directors as soon as their legal competency to act 
 was restored. Moreover, the individual Directors would 
 not be so likely to pay such zealous attention to their 
 duties, or to be so free from every bias to serve their pri- 
 vate objects, if they apprehended that their authority might 
 terminate within a short period by the changes and chances 
 of a popular election. With a view to ensure such re-elec-
 
 QUALIFICATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. 1 73 
 
 tion against any opposition of Proprietors who from caprice, 
 or favor to other candidates, might be disposed to reject 
 such old Members, without there existing, any just cause 
 for their removal, it has been for many years the custom 
 for all the Directors to join in recommending the six late 
 Members to the suffrages of the Proprietors, and in sup- 
 porting them by their own votes, and those of all others 
 whom they can influence, in case any rival candidates 
 should appear. This recommendation of the old Members 
 by the Directors is termed " Publishing the house list" 
 and it never fails of its object. In practice, therefore, there 
 are thirty Directors ; six of whom by rotation vacate their 
 office for one year— and it must be acknowledged that the 
 original policy of this rule of rotation, which was that of 
 affording to the constituents of the Directors a periodical 
 discretion in the appointment of their representatives and 
 rulers has been frustrated.
 
 SECTION II. 
 
 Of the course by ivhich the Directors act, as a Court. 
 
 Second. All the measures are transacted, direct- 
 ly or indirectly, through Courts, at which a simple 
 majority decides on all questions and proceedings. But, 
 by a bye-law of the General Court of Proprietors, 
 every Director, whether present or not, may, within 
 fourteen days after any measure resolved on, enter his 
 dissent, with his reasons, on the records of the Court. No 
 Court is competent to proceed on business, unless thirteen 
 members attend. By a bye-law the Court of Directors is 
 required to meet once at least in every week for the purposes 
 of business. By another bye-law the Court of Directors 
 annually appoint one of their members to be their Chairman 
 (which is a term commonly used in England for the Presi- 
 dent of any assembly, as being the person occupying the 
 principal seat) and another their Deputy Chairman for the 
 ensuing year. The Deputy Chairman usually, though not 
 as of course, succeeds to the office of Chairman for the next 
 year. The duties of the Chairman (and in his absence of 
 the Deputy Chairman) are, to govern the course of proceed- 
 ings at all Courts and other meetings at which he presides 
 — to bring forward ordinarily the various matters to be dis- 
 cussed — and to be the organ of personal conferences with 
 the President and Board of Control, upon such affairs of the 
 Company as require such communication. The Chairman 
 is allowed by his brother Directors a large proportionate in- 
 fluence in the disposal of appointments in- the gift of the 
 Court, and also in other matters. 
 
 For the greater facility of business the Court is divided
 
 COURSE BY WHICH THE DIRECTORS ACT. J 75 
 
 into several Committees. These Committees consist of dif- 
 ferent numbers, but the Chairman and Deputy Chairman are 
 always two of their members. The principal committees 
 are : — 
 
 1st. The Committee of Correspondence. 
 
 2nd. The Committee of Secrecy. 
 
 3rd. The Committee of Accounts. 
 
 4th. The Committee of Treasury. 
 
 It will be expedient to notice, in a general \vay, the quality 
 of business delegated to each of these four principal commit- 
 tees. There are several other Committees of less considera- 
 tion — such as that of Lawsuits, that of the House, that of the 
 Civil College in England for the instruction of those nomi- 
 nated to become Civil Servants in India, that of the Military 
 Seminary for the instruction of Cadets, that of the Library, 
 and that of the Military Fund for retired officers, and their 
 widows and families. 
 
 The Committee of Correspondence is the most important 
 of all the Committees. It is their province to consider of 
 and prepare all orders to be issued to the Governments of 
 India in the Public, Political, Military, Revenue, Judicial, 
 Law, and Ecclesiastical Departments. They receive all 
 Despatches from the Governments of India in these Depart- 
 ments, and prepare replies. They receive all Petitions and 
 Memorials addressed to the Court by individuals complain- 
 ing of grievances, or requesting favors. To their conside- 
 ration and report also are remitted most of the appoint- 
 ments of the great officers in the service of the Company. 
 
 The Committee of Secrecy is one which is expressly di- 
 rected to be appointed by a Statute passed in the year 1784. 
 The appointment of a Secret Committee was first made by 
 the Court itself upon the commencement of those contests
 
 176 COURSE BY WHICH THE DIRECTORS ACT. 
 
 with the French, which have been referred to in the preced- 
 ing discourse. The object was that of considering all 
 political mat terg arising, as between the Company and those 
 nations which might be at war with the English, and as be- 
 tween the Company and the various Native States. Such 
 matters as these were common to the consideration of the 
 English Government and the Company— and it often be- 
 came of the utmost importance that the ministers of the 
 Crown, and certain organs of the Court of Directors, should 
 communicate confidentially together — and that the subjects 
 of their joint deliberations should be kept entirely secret, not 
 only from the public, but even from the numerous members 
 of the Court. The subjects of such deliberations were, com- 
 monly, projected wars, invasions, campaigns, treaties'acquisi- 
 tions of territories, and alliances,— and all such projects were 
 obviously liable to defeat or failure by being prematurely 
 disclosed. The formation of such a Secret Committee was, 
 therefore, naturally suggested by the important political 
 position the Company gradually arrived at. It was render- 
 ed compulsory by the act passed in 1784, and was limited to 
 three members only. la time of peace the duties of this 
 Committee, although of eminent importance, are neither so 
 numerous nor so urgent as in time of any war. The mem- 
 bers and all the officers of the Committee are sworn to 
 secrecy, and communicate only with the Board of Control. 
 
 The Committee of Accounts have the custody of the books 
 in which the transfers of stock are registered, and the investi- 
 gation of transfers and superintendence of such registry. 
 They receive all bills drawn on the Company, and accept or 
 not according to advices. They receive and report on all 
 bills of charges, and manage the issuing of all the Compa- 
 ny's bills of exchange and notes issued in England. They 
 superintend the correspondence with the accountant's offices 
 in the several Presidencies of India. They have the pre- 
 paration of annual accounts of the Company's cash, of their 
 stock, produce of revenues,, sales, disbursements, receipts,
 
 COURSE BY WHICH THE DIRECTORS ACT. ] 77 
 
 payments and debts, and an estimate of the same for the 
 current year, to be laid before the Board of Control and be- 
 fore both Houses of Parliament, and also before the gene- 
 ral Court of Proprietors. 
 
 The Committee of the Treasury provides for the payment 
 of all dividends on stock, and interest on Company's bills and 
 notes, and negociates the Company's loans. They super- 
 intend the communications between the Court and the 
 Indian Governments in the departments of their general 
 treasuries at each Presidency. They have the custody of 
 the Company's seal, used in England for the purpose of exe- 
 cuting the deeds and contracts of the Company, and see 
 to the due affixing the seal on instruments to be executed. 
 And, generally, they have the care of and dealing with the 
 cash and bullion of the Company. 
 
 None of these Committees, it is to be observed, have any 
 power in themselves ; unless any matters are by special or- 
 ders of the Court directed to be carried into effect by them. 
 Their only actual duties, in ordinary, are to inquire and re- 
 port, and to nominate ox recommend to certain appointments. 
 These reports must be signed by the members ; and, unless 
 they are laid before the Court itself within eight days after 
 being so signed, they become null and void. It is rather, 
 therefore, with a view to the requisite information of the 
 whole body of the Court, and for the sake of obtaining the 
 opinion of members who have made it their business to as- 
 certain all details of the matter under discussion, that these 
 Committees are appointed, than with any vfew of delegating 
 that authority which can only be exercised by the Court it- 
 self, consisting of no less a number than thirteen of its 
 members. 
 
 Copies of all the proceedings, resolutions, and orders of 
 each Court must, within eight days after the holding of the
 
 178 
 
 COURSE BY WHICH THE DIRECTORS ACT. 
 
 Court, be forwarded to the Board of Control. Copies, also, 
 of ail letters, ad vices, and dispatches received from India, 
 which relate in' any manner to its government, or to its 
 revenues, or to the appropriation of them, must be laid be- 
 fore the Board of Control immediately after their receipt. 
 I shall explain the objects of submitting all this information 
 to the Board of Control, when I come to treat of the func- 
 tions and authority of that body : in the meanwhile it will 
 be sufficient to mention, that no orders or instructions what- 
 ever, relating to the government or revenues of India, can 
 be sent out by the Court, until either approved by that 
 Board, or such a course be taken by the Board, with 
 a view to a revising or alteration of such dispatches, as 
 will be hereafter noticed.
 
 SECTION III. 
 
 Of the Powers of the Court of Directors. 
 
 Third. The powers of the Court of Directors over India, 
 for as long as the Parliament of England have so determin- 
 ed, and subject to such control as has been, and will be 
 further, detailed, are in their nature those of a supreme sove- 
 reign authority. Thegreat distance, however, of this supreme 
 governing body from the actual scene of their operations 
 renders it necessary that a system of subordinate local 
 Governments should be organized— to which Governments 
 very large discretionary powers are given ; some by the 
 general instructions and orders of the Court, and some by 
 the Statutes of the English legislature itself. But, what- 
 ever discretionary powers are exercised by the chief or 
 other local Governments of India, they are all, neverthe- 
 less, subject to such interference, sanction, revision, or 
 reversal, as the Court in its paramount authority may judge 
 expedient. 
 
 By the terms of supreme sovereign authority is not to be 
 understood a pure arbitrary power, without any constitu- 
 tional rules of action, and without law. The Court is 
 created by a law ; and it governs according to laws. The 
 law which has constituted its plan of government is, like 
 that of the law of- the English constitution itself, a law 
 to be traced to the general will of the people, expressed 
 in this instance by a Statute of the Imperial Parliament, 
 which is the organ of the whole English nation. The laws, 
 according to which the Court governs, are either such Sta- 
 tutes (which this Court cannot repeal or disobey)— or they 
 are the ancient unaltered local laws of India, or laws
 
 ]gQ POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 
 
 made by themselves or their local Governments of India, 
 all of which the Court must conform to, until they through 
 their Indian Government, or the Indian Government it- 
 self, shall alter or annul them. By saying, therefore, that 
 the nature of the Court's authority is supreme is meant, 
 that it has the legislative power, by which it may dictate 
 what shall be law, and what shall not — with the exception 
 of such laws as its own constitution is dependent upon, 
 and such as the Parliament of the united nation, by which 
 itself was created, shall have laid down for its guidance. 
 Moreover, the Court unites in itself the executive, as well 
 as the legislative, authorities of Government — there being 
 no separate branch of this Court (as is the case with the 
 supreme authority of England) entrusted with the adminis- 
 tration of that authority according to those express laws 
 which may have been enacted, or according to sound dis- 
 cretion in all cases not provided for by express laws. It 
 is true, indeed, that, by Statute, the Governor General of 
 India in Council is entrusted with authority to make ge- 
 neral laws ; but its laws may be annulled by the Court of 
 Directors ; and the laws which that Court may require to 
 be enacted must be passed by the Government in India. 
 That Government, therefore, is in all respects subordinate, 
 and not in itself supreme in any sense ; although the Go- 
 vernment of the Governor General in Council is usually 
 called the supreme Government of India, for the sake of 
 distinction. The regulated power, also, of the Board of 
 Control to reject, or alter, . the orders and instructions of 
 this Court in matters of government, certainly qualifies its 
 political supremacy : but, inasmuch as the Board is not 
 empowered to originate any measures or orders, its autho- 
 rity operates but as a check ; and is not altogether subver- 
 sive of the supreme character of the Court's powers of 
 Government subject to the restrictions I have noticed — 
 subject to the express Statutes of the British Parliament— 
 and subject to the interference of the Board of Control,
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS, |gj 
 
 by the specially appointed course, and to a limited extent — 
 the laws and administrative powers of the Court of Direc- 
 tors, so long as its constitution continues,' have absolute 
 force over the property, liberty, and lives of all who dwell 
 within the Company's territories in India. 
 
 To the Court of Directors, then, is delegated the power 
 of issuing such orders and directions, to be carried into effect 
 by the local authorities of India, and of framing such laws to 
 be observed in the conduct of Government, and in the ad- 
 ministration of justice, as to them may be expedient. Upon 
 submitting such measures to the consideration of the Board 
 of Control, and receiving notice of its disapproval, or of its 
 revisal, of them, they are authorized to make such repre- 
 sentations and explanations as they may think fit 
 respecting the matters upon which any disapprobation 
 has been expressed, or variations suggested, by the Board ; 
 which representations, the Board is required to give attention 
 to, and then finally to decide upon. If any difference of 
 opinion shall arise, as to whether the subject-matter of the 
 Board's disapproval, or alteration, has relation to the Go- 
 vernment or Revenues of India (upon which subjects only 
 the Board is entitled to exercise its powers of control) or 
 as to whether their orders or directions are in any other 
 respect beyond the scope of their legal authority, the Court 
 is empowered to submit any such question to the adjudi- 
 cation of certain of the judges of England. 
 
 By the last Charter Act of 1833, the Court has been re- 
 quired to draw up, and submit both to Parliament and to the 
 Board of Control, a body of standing general rules for the 
 guidance of the Supreme Government of India in the super- 
 intendence and administration of the affairs of the country. 
 These general rules have referpnce to the mode of exercis- 
 ing the powers entrusted to the local Governments, and to 
 the expedient course to be adopted in giving publicity to 
 the laws of the country. This is one of the many precau-
 
 182 
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 
 
 tions devised for ensuring some systematic flan in conduct- 
 ing the administration of the Indian Governments and for 
 imposing limits' upon the discretion even of the executive 
 branch of those governments, as far as a due regard to their 
 efficiency would allow of. 
 
 The Governor General of India (as will be in a future dis- 
 course explained) has, under authority of a Statute, certain, 
 powers of acting, in matters entrusted to the administration 
 of the governments of India, by his own sole authority, 
 without any previous communication with any of the Councils 
 of India. To the Court of Directors, however, is reserved 
 the power of suspending and restoring the liberty of exercis- 
 ing this special privilege. All individual power and'discre- 
 tion is contrary to the spirit of the constitutional laws of 
 England, which in all political measures aims at securing 
 the advantages of free discussion and union of opinions. 
 Although, therefore, emergencies may arise, during the ab- 
 sence of the Governor General from his Council, calling for 
 immediate resolutions — yet, so jealous is the English Go- 
 vernment of all arbitrary authority, that it provides against 
 all defects of a personal quality, and supplies the means of 
 denying to the rashness of one man a power which may be 
 safely reposed for a time in the cautious discretion of another. 
 
 The Court of Directors has but very limited power in 
 granting away the funds and revenues of the Company, for 
 the mere benefit of individual persons. No pecuniary grants 
 can be made of any gratuity beyond 600£, or of any pension, 
 or of any new or increased salary, beyond 200£ per annum, 
 without the consent, not only of the Board of Control, but 
 also of two general Courts of Proprietors. 
 
 All the chief and most important offices held in India, 
 both in the Civil and Military Departments of its Govern- 
 ment, are in the appointment of the Court of Directors. To
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 
 
 183 
 
 some of these offices the Court appoints directly and ex- 
 pressly — as regards others (which form a vast proportion of 
 the appointments held in India) the Court selects two 
 classes of persons, out of which classes only can individuals 
 be chosen to fill such offices. One of these classes is that 
 of the Civil Servants, each of whom is originally appointed 
 by the Court under the name of a Writer — the other is that 
 of the Military servants, who enter the service of the Com- 
 pany under the denomination of Cadets. Of the military 
 servants, who also hold commissions in India as military 
 officers of the Queen, and who rise in rank and are govern- 
 ed in a similar way to that in which all other portions of 
 the English army are governed, I have no occasion to make 
 further mention. Upon the quality of the Civil Service it 
 may appear to the purpose to offer, presently, a few observa- 
 tions. 
 
 The Court of Directors appoints expressly to the office of 
 the Governor General of India, to that of all the members of 
 his Council (save one), to that of Governor of each of the 
 other Presidencies of India, to that of all members of those 
 Governors' Councils, to that of Commander-in-Chief of all 
 the military forces of India, to that of Commander-in-Chief 
 of the forces of the Presidencies of Madras and Bombay, and 
 to some other minor offices which it is unnecessary to enu- 
 merate. The functions of one of the Councillors of the Su- 
 preme Government of India are confined exclusively to the 
 legislative department of that government. 
 
 The appointments to the office of the Governor General 
 of India, to that of the Governor of each of the Presidencies 
 of India, to that of the Commander-in-Chief of India, to 
 that of the other Commanders-in-Chief, and to that of the 
 legislative Member of the Supreme Government, are neither 
 of them valid or complete until approved of by the Crown.
 
 |g4 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 
 
 This provision of the British legislature supplies another 
 link in the chain by which the destinies of India are bound 
 up with those of, the whole English Empire. The Court is 
 necessarily compelled, through the risk of rejection, to select 
 persons to fill these high political stations whose principles 
 of government, and whose qualifications, are satisfactory 
 to those who administer the general affairs of the English 
 Government. These ministers of the Crown can, themselves, 
 hold their authority no longer than while their own measures 
 are satisfactory to the British Parliament, as being condu- 
 cive to the national strength and prosperity. And thus is 
 secured, as far as human designs can perhaps accomplish, an 
 union of councils and of policy through all gradations of au- 
 thority, from the supreme organ of the state down to the 
 humblest official entrusted with a share of political power. 
 
 The Court of Directors, can, at their own discretion, 
 and without assigning any other cause than such as they 
 may see fit to specify remove from their offices either the 
 Governor General, or any Governor, or Commander-in-Chief, 
 or Member of Council ; and in like manner may suspend, or 
 dismiss altogether, from their service any of their Civil or 
 Military Servants. There is, however, one case of exception 
 to this power of removal provided by the last Charter Act 
 of 1833 — which is, that when, upon any vacancy of any 
 office in the appointment of the Court, that Court shall make 
 default in appointing within the time prefixed by the Act, 
 (which is two months from the time of the vacancy being 
 notified to the Court) and the Crown shall consequently, ac- 
 cording to the course by that act detailed, make the appoint- 
 ment to any such vacant office, then the Court shall not have 
 the right of removing the party so appointed, not by them- 
 selves, but by the Crown, and the power of removal of this 
 party shall be solely in the Crown. 
 
 The exclusive power of this Court to appoint all persons
 
 rOWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. |g^ 
 
 who are to be engaged in the civil administration of the 
 Government of India, is open to serious objections. As my 
 object is to explain, and not merely to set forth, the consti- 
 tution and quality of the Company and of its system of go- 
 vernment, I shall proceed to examine and comment upon 
 these objections. 
 
 So long as the Company pursued purely, or mainly, their 
 objects of trade, it was no proper concern of the rest of the 
 public at large, whom the organs of the Company's Govern- 
 ment employed as the servants to superintend or manage 
 their affairs. Such appointments necessarily fell to the private 
 patronage of those members of the Company, to whom 
 were entrusted the Company's private interests ; and there 
 was a sufficient security in the common interests of all that 
 such a patronage would be employed to the best advantage 
 of all. 
 
 But, when the Company no longer had the care of any 
 private interests — when their trade was totally abandoned, 
 and the political government of the country, and the pubhc 
 concerns of the people were their sole occupation ; — the case 
 become very different. It must be obvious that the inter- 
 ests of the whole nation were those alone to be considered, 
 as well in the system of making appointments, a« in every 
 other mode of exercising their functions — and that in the 
 appointment to all public offices the just and most efficient 
 administration of the government should be exclusively had 
 in view. In the system, however, of appointing individual* 
 to the Civil Service the private patron acre and interests of 
 certain members of the Company is had in view, as well as 
 tho^e of the nation at large— and it remains to enquire 
 whether that nystetn does not operate prejudicially to the 
 government of the country. 
 
 The original appointments to the Service are given to
 
 Jgg POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 
 
 youths between the ages of 16 and 21. The qualities which 
 will eventually characterize a person's manhood cannot be 
 ascertained with much accuracy at that period of life, 
 though existing abilities to a certain extent may be pro- 
 nounced upon. But, whatever the Civil Servant may after- 
 wards prove, in point of capacity, his qualification to be 
 employed in the administration of the Indian Government 
 has been definitively settled. Unless absolutely deficient in 
 intellect, he can hardly be rejected from employment at any 
 period of his after life — but if the greatest genius, in the full 
 strength of manhood, should be a candidate for employment, 
 he could not be admitted if he had not originally been ap- 
 pointed to the Service in his youth ; and the other must be 
 placed in office in preference. 
 
 The Court require, before granting an appointment to the 
 Service, that the probationer should pass through a certain 
 course of education, or at least evince his acquirements by 
 passing successfully through a scholastic examination. The 
 scale of competency is, however, not beyond what a youth of 
 ordinary intellects, with ordinary exertion, by the age of 18 
 may attain. As no one can be a candidate but such as are 
 nominated by the Court, no amount of talents or attainments 
 could obtain for their possessor the liberty of devoting them 
 to the service of the Company, without such nomination, 
 The Court secures the Government of India against the ab- 
 solute incompetency of the Civil Servant at the time of his 
 appointment ; but their objects of private patronage would 
 be interfered with, if they made provisions to secure to 
 their service the most competent servants that could be 
 obtained, in preference to those nominated by themselves — 
 and, therefore, no such provisions are made. Indeed, it 
 may be said that to some degree this power of patronage 
 operates to the preference of a comparatively inferior no- 
 minee. For, if a nomination be secured to any party, and 
 he can give it to one of several whom he desires to
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. Jg<y 
 
 advance in the world, he might with reason propose to the 
 ablest youth to make his way in some ordinary occupation 
 or profession in which he was likely to gajn distinction ; 
 and he might reasonably give the appointment to the Civil 
 Service to another, who, though not incompetent to that 
 employment, might have less chance from his capacity 
 to succeed in any other. 
 
 If these were all the objections to the system of appoint- 
 ment to the Civil Service, there might appear scarcely a 
 sufficient inducement to notice them; for it must be allow- 
 ed that, out of so large a number of well educated youths, 
 a considerable supply is made of talents for the exigencies 
 of the Indian Governments. But these are not the only 
 objections. Those who thus enter the service are usually 
 such in whose progress their patrons take a personal inter- 
 est. They come out with an acknowledged claim to be, 
 not only put in some office of emolument, but to be ad- 
 vanced according to their seniority to the higher and 
 more important offices in the administration. They are 
 presumed to be provided for duiing life with an am- 
 ple income, and also with the means, by a prudent 
 course of management, of realizing a competent, or perhaps 
 a large, fortune. The Governments, of India would, in 
 justice, manifest much caution in exercising a preference 
 of one servant over another on the mere score of superior 
 abilities — they would be still more cautious in rejecting 
 from important employment any party on the ground of 
 absolute incompetency. The total exclusion from any lu- 
 crative employment, merely on the ground of absolute defi- 
 ciency of intellect, or of industry, or of acquirements, is a 
 circumstance almost unheard of. The raising to high office 
 of a junior, altogether out of his class, and over the heads 
 of a large proportion of his seniors, on account of eminent- 
 ly superior qualifications for the public service, is equally 
 unknown. Such measures as these would be universally consi-
 
 188 
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 
 
 dered, as well by the body of the Civil Servants, as by the 
 Court itself, to savour of injustice. The Governments of 
 India cannot direct an unlimited discretion towards select- 
 ing those who are to administer the chief affairs of the 
 state, according to the test of their superior ability to fill 
 their posts for the public benefit. Their choice must be 
 chiefly influenced, if not guided, by a deference to the pri- 
 vate interests, and to the claims hy seniority, of individuals. 
 Ihey can exercise some discretion in excluding the incom- 
 petent, but very little in promoting the most meritorious. 
 
 It may be justly apprehended that the effect of this sys- 
 tem is to mortify emulation, in proportion as it diminishes 
 hope. The aim of a virtuous and elevated mind is, riot the 
 mere attainment of a high station, but the attainment of 
 it through pre-eminent qualifications. The possession of 
 a distinguished office is chiefly valuable to a man of supe- 
 rior talents and honorable principles, as affording him 
 the means of performing some conspicuous public 
 services. But such qualifications can only be acquired, 
 and such services can only be rendered, by laborious 
 exertion — and the only incitement to exertion is the 
 just expectation of reward. In proportion, therefore, as the 
 system of advancement in the Civil Service holds out equal 
 expectations to the negligent, the ignorant, and the weak- 
 minded, and to the able and industrious, must it be reason- 
 ably expected that there will be a deficiency of that exertion 
 on which high qualifications for public duties depend. In 
 that proportion has it a tendency to lower the level of the 
 Civil Service, and reduce all its members to that same level. 
 As far as birth, and manners, liberal education, and the pre- 
 valence of honorable principles can serve to raise that level, 
 it must be allowed that it is a high one. The majority of 
 its members, appealing to such well founded credit, and also 
 to the exalted merits of several among them whose abilities 
 and public virtues have gained them an illustrious name in
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. Jgg 
 
 the history of tin's country, will probably deny the justice 
 of these remarks, or disregard them. Those, however, vvho 
 feel a consciousness of superior talents — who turn with a 
 noble ambition for the enlarged means of serving the inter- 
 ests of their country — and who toil to attain eminence by 
 improving those qualities by which they may adorn it—such 
 men will regret that they can only advance with the 
 throng ; they will be sensible that the true dignity and re- 
 putation of their service is impaired by the obstacles which 
 oppose the rise of its most meritorious members ; and they 
 will scarce think justice is duly observed towards the people 
 in neglecting the very best means of securing an efficient ad- 
 ministration of their government. They will reflect with 
 pride on that character for integrity, and general talent, which 
 has been justly earned by the body to which they belong ; 
 but they will not mistake these merits for those of the most 
 exalted quality which can be displayed in the government 
 of a vast Kmpire. They will appreciate the excellencies of 
 those of their body, who by their conspicuous public services 
 have done honor to the first offices of the state; but they 
 will distinguish between those services which may have been 
 accomplished in spite of a^aulty system, and the merits of 
 the system itself. 
 
 If no other consideration is likely to lead, ere long, to 
 some change in the mode of selection to civil employments, 
 the growing intelligence and qualification for civil duties 
 of the Native community must necessarily produce it. 
 Hitherto this question has attracted little concern amongst 
 them ; and, however important in a general and political 
 point of view, it has been one of little moment as respects 
 their immediate individual interests. Until the Empire of 
 India was consolidated, and its plan of government thorough- 
 ly brought into operation, and (irmly settled, it would have 
 been not only useless, but disastrous, to have attempted these 
 great and beneficial objects through the Natives themselves,
 
 190 
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 
 
 to whom the domination of the English was new, and by 
 whom their principles of government were scarcely in any 
 degree understood. But the condition and the feelings of 
 the Native people have greatly altered. As internal tran- 
 quillity, the security of possessions, social intercourse, and 
 useful knowledge has increased— so has advanced the attach- 
 ment of the. people to the British rule, and their natural and 
 laudable desire to share in the honors, as well as the labours, 
 of public employment. These are sentiments which must 
 be respected. These are wishes which cannot be disap- 
 pointed. The access of Natives to power and office is ac- 
 knowledged to be just on principle, and expedient upon 
 sound policy. In the spirit of these generous views the 
 authorities, both in England and in India, are forward in 
 holding out these encouraging prospects to the Native com- 
 munity. The author of these pages contributes his humble 
 labours to promote so great and so just a national cause. For 
 it must ever be borne in mind that it is by such intellectual 
 exertion as that which engages the Native reader in his 
 present task — it is by the extent and quality of his inform- 
 ation, as well as by his ability, his incorrupt integrity, 
 and his love of truth — that the Native candidate must jus- 
 tify his claim for public employment. But, when qualifica- 
 tions and virtues such as these shall mark his character 
 and pretensions, I know not the office, however eminent for 
 honor, and however important for usefulness, which may 
 not (as I earnestly hope it will) be open to Native ambition. 
 
 Before quitting this examination of the powers of the 
 Court of Directors, I would desire to advert to one other 
 particular, which is rather among the duties than the powers 
 of that Court : namely, that of receiving and pronouncing 
 upon petitions. All persons, of whatever rank or condition, 
 living under their Government are at liberty to address 
 themselves directly to the Court itself upon any subject 
 within that Court's authority to redress. It is, however,
 
 POWERS OF THE COURT OF DIRECTORS. 191 
 
 a rule observed by that Court to require that every such 
 petition stating any grievance or cause of complaint should 
 be addressed to them through the Government of the Pre- 
 sidency. The reason of this is, that the Government may 
 have an opportunity, before the consideration of the Court 
 is given to the subject, of making all expedient inquiry on 
 the spot into the truth and grounds of the statement made, 
 and of affording whatever explanation the case may appear 
 to call for. Without such information from the Govern- 
 ment, or some competent authority, it must be obvious that 
 no reliance can safely be placed on any representation from 
 an interested party. It is another rule that the Court never 
 interferes in matters upon which the ordinary tribunals of 
 justice can afford redress. The propriety of this rule 
 is clear. These tribunals are expressly appointed for 
 the purposes of deciding on all rights claimed, or crimes 
 charged. They are clothed with all necessary powers — 
 and their course of investigation is expressly regulated with 
 view to the attainment of truth, through a fair hearing of both 
 sides. The interference of any other authority would be 
 an arbitrary violation of the laws of the country, and >the 
 substitution of a discretionary and inadequate trial of 
 rights or of wrongs, for that course of trial which has been 
 appointed by law for no other reason than because it ap- 
 pears to be the best. But, still, there are many wrongs and 
 oppressions which are beyond the reach of the laws; there 
 are modes of doing injustice by evading the law ; and there 
 are injuries which powerful men are able to inflict in defi- 
 ance of the law. It is of importance, therefore, that this 
 door for relief should be widely opened ; and that, from the 
 highest political magistrate to the lowest, every person in 
 authority should be aware that he is responsible for every 
 act of his power, even to the meanest individual who should 
 be aggrieved by it.
 
 SECTION IV. 
 
 Of the Board of Control. 
 
 I am now to advert to (hat body, whose office is appro- 
 priately designated by its title, namely, the Board of Con- 
 trol. I will first shew how it is constituted, and will then 
 notice its functions. 
 
 The authority of this Board was first created by a Statute 
 passed in the year 1784. It took its rise out of long and 
 violent discussions in the British Parliament on the whole 
 conduct of the Company's Government. A strong dispo- 
 sition prevailed amongst a powerful party in the legislature 
 to new-model the system of the Indian Government alto- 
 gether, and to repose the administration of it in some new 
 constituted body. But, although that proposal was after 
 much contest rejected, yet a very large majority, both in 
 the general Court of Proprietors and in the Parliament, 
 ultimately concurred in the expediency of some measure 
 by which all the governing functionaries of tha Company 
 might be made more responsible to superior authority, by 
 which their proceedings might be checked and superintend- 
 ed, and by which the administration of the Indian portion 
 of the British Empire might be more effectually united with, 
 and made dependent upon, the supreme sovereign povver of 
 the state. 
 
 Accordingly, this Board, with its important duties, and 
 composed of some of the highest officers engaged in conduct- 
 ing the executive department of the English Government, 
 was appointed. Its powers were further regulaled by a Char- 
 ter Act which passed in 1793. Additional powers were de-
 
 OF THE BOARD OF CONTROL. |93 
 
 legated by the subsequent Charter Act of 1813: and the 
 constitution and functions of the Board were finally adjust- 
 ed and settled by the last Charter Act bf 1833. The 
 President of this Board, is always, in consideration of his 
 high office, selected by the Crown as one of those Ministers 
 of state, to whose management (as far as depends upon the 
 executive Government of England) the administration of 
 all the affairs of the British Empire is entrusted. He receives 
 a salary for the performance of his duties. The other mem- 
 bers of the Board are — the Prime Minister, the Minister of 
 the Finances, and most of the other Ministers of the Crown, 
 (as standing members by virtue of their offices as such 
 Ministers) together with such other members as the Crown 
 may think tit to appoint. None of these latter members re- 
 ceive any salary. 
 
 Every member, before entering on the duties of his office, 
 must take the following oath : 
 
 He " faithfully promises and swears that, as a Commis- 
 " sioner or member of the Board for the affairs of India, he 
 " will give his best advice and assistance for the good go- 
 " vernment of the British possessions in India, and the due 
 " administration of the revenues of the same, according to 
 11 law ; and will execute the several powers and trusts re- 
 " posed in him according to the best of his skill and judg- 
 ement, without favor or affection, prejudice or malice, to 
 " any person whatever." 
 
 The meeting of any two or more members constitutes a 
 Board qualified to act/ The President, and in his absence 
 the member next in the or ler of nomination in the list of 
 the commissioners who happens to be present, is entitled to 
 a casting vote, in all cases of equal divisions. The signa- 
 ture of one of their Secretaries to their proceedings gives 
 them formal validity.
 
 ]94 OF THE BOARD OF CONTROL. 
 
 The functions of this Board are, generally, " to superin- 
 " tend, direct, and control, all acts, operations, and con- 
 " cerns of the Company, which in any manner relate to, or 
 " concern, the Government or Revenues of the territories 
 " of India." With a view to these comprehensive objects 
 the Board may have access to all records and papers of the 
 Company, and can call for all requisite statements and in- 
 formation. The general Court of Proprietors are likewise 
 required to submit all their proceedings; and the Court of 
 Directors are required, as we have seen, to lay before the 
 Board all advices and dispatches which they receive from 
 India, and all orders and instructions which they propose to 
 send out to India (except such as belong to a class, which 
 the Board may have exempted from such previous reference) 
 relating to its Government or Revenues. The Board are 
 thereupon empowered, within two months, to approve or 
 disapprove of any orders or dispatches proposed to be sent 
 out, or to revise or alter them. In case of any such altera- 
 tions, the Board must state in writing their reasons at large 
 for such alterations with a view to the Court of Director's 
 making (within fourteen days) such representations as they 
 think fit with respect to them. After considering these re- 
 presentations (if any shall be made) the Board's decision is to 
 be final. The Board may, further, call upon the Court to 
 frame and transmit to them instructions for dispatches to 
 be sent to India on any subject connected with its Govern- 
 ment or Revenues, and if the Court shall neglect for four- 
 teen days to forward to the Board for their consideration 
 such dispatches to be sent out, the Board may itself frame 
 the dispatches and instructions, and require them to be sent 
 out ; unless, upon any representations of the Court, the Board 
 such think fit to alter them. The Board may also send 
 any instructions or orders connected with the making war 
 or peace, or with negociations with foreign Powers or Native 
 Princes, and which they may consider to require secrecy, 
 to the Secret Committee of the Court ; and those dis-
 
 OF THE BOARD OF CONTROL, 
 
 195 
 
 patches are to be forwarded at once by that Committee, 
 without any disclosure in any quarter. 
 
 And, lastly, this Board has authority to disallow, and 
 cause to be repealed, all laws made by the supreme Go- 
 vernment of India ; and in like manner to disallow of any of 
 those general rules which the Court of Directors are re- 
 quired to frame, for the course of procedure by the supreme 
 Government in the exercise of its powers, and in promul- 
 gating the laws it may pass. 
 
 The experience of fifty years has so manifested the 
 wisdom wiih which the establishment of this controlling 
 authority was planned, and the advantages which have re- 
 sulted through its means, that the expediency of its conti- 
 nuance for twenty years longer, as provided by the last 
 Charter Act, seems to have been admitted by common 
 consent. It is impossible to point out under any civilized 
 Government, or perhaps to devise, an institution more 
 calculated to ensure justice and consistency in all political 
 measures, and the protection of the people from every 
 species of oppression. The Board is so constituted as that 
 wilh a'l its extensive powers, as well in mere matters of 
 detail, as in concerns of national moment, it acts never- 
 theless under constant and effectual responsibility. It acts 
 in immediate communication with the whole body of the 
 Queen's Ministers; and all its proceedings, in common with 
 their'?, are under the continual review and superintendence 
 of the British Parliament. The President and Members 
 of it are not appointed for life, and their possession of 
 office depends, not only on the quality of their own in- 
 dividual conduct in office, but on that of the general policy 
 of the Ministry with whom they are united. They have 
 no certain private interest to serve ; they have no perma- 
 nency of power to render them reckless. Both interest and 
 power are dependant on the honor of their reputation, and
 
 196 0F TIIE BOARD OF CONTROL. 
 
 the efficiency of their talents. Subject, however, to res- 
 ponsibilities like these, their authority over all persons 
 connected with the Indian Governments and over all acts 
 and proceedings, done, or proposed in the administration 
 of them, is complete and supreme. They can command 
 the full knowledge of every thing : they can displace all 
 Indian functionaries, from the Governor General himself 
 to the humblest political servant of the Comoany : they 
 can revise, change, and (acting through the Court of Di- 
 rectors) even direct, every measure in the civil, military, 
 or financial departments of the Indian state. As every 
 thing connected with these objects can be done by them, 
 so can nothing be done without them. Still, with all 
 these vast powers, necessary for the unobstructed discharge 
 of its great and innumerable duties, the Board is not an 
 active, but strictly a superintending and controlling body. 
 It cannot correspond directly with the functionaries and 
 offices engaged in carrying on the administration of the 
 Indian Governments. Its organization is not calculated for 
 transacting the extensive business entrusted to the ordi- 
 nary management of the Court. Its occupation is to 
 examine into every proceeding, and to interfere only as 
 occasion may seem to demand. Limited as the practical ex- 
 ercise of its functions is, its powers are unbounded as re- 
 gards the accomplishment of its appropriate duties— the 
 checking that which is wrong, the preserving that which is 
 right, and the advancing that which is expedient.
 
 DISCOURSE V. 
 
 Of the Governments in India. 
 
 P, 
 
 RELIMIKAR Y Observations on the subject of this 
 Discourse. History of the Formation and course of the 
 English Government in India previous to the first regu- 
 lating Act of 1773. Of the Progress of the English Go- 
 vernments in India, from the year 1773 until the passing 
 of the last Charter Act of 1833. Of the manner in which 
 the Governments of India are constituted, and of what 
 members these Governments are composed. Of the Method 
 and course in which the Governments of India, exercise 
 their Functions. Of the Powers exercised by the Govern- 
 ments of India : and, first, of the Superintending and 
 Controlling poivers of the Supreme Government. Of 
 the History and nature of the Legislative powers of the 
 Supreme Government. Of other peculiar powers of the 
 Supreme Government. Of the poivers exercised by the 
 Subordinate Governments of India. Reflections on the 
 quality of the System of Government in India ; and notices 
 of some defects.
 
 DISCOURSE V. 
 
 Of the Governments in India. 
 
 SECTION I. 
 
 Preliminary Observations on the subject of this 
 
 Discourse. 
 
 N. 
 
 O subject of the English Empire, whether Native or 
 British born, who is settled in India, can be altogether 
 indifferent to the nature and quality of the Government 
 under which he lives — none but those of the most abject 
 condition can rest content in utter ignorance of its scheme 
 — none who aim at a superior station in life, to be useful in 
 the state, and to reap the fruits of a liberal education, can 
 rationally indulge such hopes, without an acquaintance with 
 its course and plan, even in its details. 
 
 It might be expected, therefore, that a discourse, which 
 apparently professes to open briefly anil clearly to the mind 
 of a Native, or an unlearned reader, an exposition of the 
 political plan of power according to which the Govern- 
 ments in India are conducted, would prove an attractive 
 source of interesting in formation to the general body of the 
 Indian public, and be consulted with avidity by all ranks 
 of the people to whom books have become the means of 
 knowledge. And, if a just comprehension of the frame and 
 scheme of the Indian Governments, which has been built 
 up under the counsels of a succession of the ablest men
 
 200 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THIS DISCOURSE. 
 
 who have ever engaged in the weighty task of forming and 
 of ruling a state, and of men who under the heaviest res- 
 ponsibility to tqeir countrymen guided themselves by those 
 principles of government which best conduce to the per- 
 manent prosperity of the people — if a just comprehension 
 of the scheme of the Indian Governments, thus construct- 
 ed, could be imparted in a few plain words, suited to the 
 general capacity of even the humbler class of readers, 
 there could scarcely be a national benefit in the power of an 
 individual to perform which could be so worthy of his am- 
 bition. It might serve to diffuse a spirit of attachment to 
 a system of rule which has beyond all others promoted the 
 well- being of the people of this land, and to excite a com- 
 mon interest in its preservation. It might serve at least 
 to protect them from those discontents which so often 
 spring from erroneous views of a country's political con- 
 dition, and are so often founded on the assertion of public 
 grievances which have never in fact existed. For those 
 who are loudest in upbraiding their Government and its 
 measures are not always the most competent to expose 
 what is wrong. These reproaches more commonly flow 
 from such as are unwilling to learn, and incapable to teach. 
 Those, who from accurate inquiry and sound knowledge are 
 induced to cast blame on real evils, are generally as remark- 
 able for their moderation, as for their firmness and earn- 
 estness of purpose. They desire amendment rather than 
 overthrow, and amelioration rather than change. 
 
 But an exposition of the system and plan upon which 
 the local Governments of India are framed are beyond the 
 scope of a few plain words, or of a brief popular discourse. 
 The student who would gain a competent acquaintance with 
 the mighty machinery, whereby the right's, the peace, and 
 the security of a hundred millions of subjects are maintain- 
 ed in regulated order, must bring to the inquiry a greater 
 store of knowledge than a few hours reading can supply.
 
 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THIS DISCOURSE. 201 
 
 For— not to mention that course of education through 
 which alone the meaning and application of the appropriate 
 terms used in discussions of this sort can, be learnt— he 
 who would rightly comprehend the nature of the Indian 
 Governments, and judge of their character, must have 
 directed his reflective attention to the circumstances under 
 which they arose, and to the principles on which they 
 are founded. He should know something of the origin 
 and objects of political government ; he should have 
 acquired some information of the former history and 
 condition of this country ; he should have traced and 
 understood the progress of the British power ; he should 
 have gained some conception of that constitutional form 
 of tbe British Government with which the system and 
 course of the Indian Governments are bound up ; and, 
 lastly, he should have inquired in what way the peculiar 
 structure of these Governments has conformed to the ne- 
 cessity of event*, and the state of the Indian community. 
 
 These are the considerations which have induced me to 
 prepare the reader of this present discourse by others which 
 are preliminary to that which may probably be his more 
 immediate concern : nor can I commend the impatience of 
 that reader who, instead of regarding this and my previous 
 discourses as one consistent whole, shall attempt, as it were, 
 to snatch from the few ensuing pages some vague and general 
 notion of the plan and character of the Governments in India, 
 without the requisite power of discrimination, and without a 
 just understanding even of the language and expressions 
 employed. The knowledge, indeed, of things as they exist, 
 and of effects as they appear, is more or less needful, and 
 can never be useless : as he who knows what is the shape 
 and structure of the earth, or the course of the planets and 
 the system of the universe, or has become proficient in any 
 of the arts of life, will have furnished bis mind with some- 
 thing that may be necessary to him in his occupations, or
 
 202 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THIS DISCOURSE. 
 
 somewhat that may be a source of pleasure, as well in his 
 private reflections as in his intercourse with society. But 
 such knowledge, as it is imperfect in itself, so is it, compara- 
 tively, unfruitful in improvement. The mind may still he left 
 involved in perplexities, errors, and superstitions. That 
 knowledge only is certain or complete which explains effects 
 by their causes, measures by their reasons, and appearances 
 by their origin : as he can know little of the astronomical 
 system of the world, who knows not by what power the pla- 
 nets move in their courses, and in what way light and dark- 
 ness, cold and heat, revisit the earth. 
 
 And thus, also, a thorough knowledge of the political 
 constitution of the Government in India is not to be asquir- 
 ed by merely ascertaining who are the local ruling authori- 
 ties, under what legislative regulations they are invested 
 with their powers, and by what course they exercise their 
 functions. He who would gain a certain and complete 
 knowledge of them must inquire into the history, the origin, 
 the objects, and the principles of these institutions — com- 
 paring them with such as they have superseded, and exa- 
 mining them by their conformity to those general principles 
 of government which tend most to the welfare of a nation. 
 It is such knowledge alone that can give ability to judge of 
 the merits or demerits of the existing system of govern- 
 ment, or a capacity to serve the interests of the state in 
 upholding that which is right, amending that which is 
 faulty, and improving that which is defective. 
 
 Any endeavour to spread political instruction of this 
 quality among the bulk of the people , must be vain. But 
 it is not only a desirable, and a feasible, but a most essential 
 object that it should be disseminated amongst those classes 
 who have leisure and ambition to attain a liberal education, 
 and out of whom are to be chosen such as aspire to fill of- 
 fices and stations in the service of their country. It is
 
 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THIS DISCOURSE. 
 
 203 
 
 from the influence, and talents, and information of such as 
 these that the masses of the population must form their 
 opinions ; and, in proportion to the correctness and accura- 
 cy of political knowledge among the influential orders, is the 
 probability of national peace. For civil distractions grow not 
 so much out of public grievances as out of the misrepresenta- 
 tions of the ignorant and uninformed : neither is there a 
 greater security against the perversions of designing men 
 than in the sound intelligence of those whose common 
 interest it is to oppose them.
 
 SECTION II. 
 
 History of the Formation and course of the English 
 Government in India previous to the first regulating 
 
 Act of 1773. 
 
 In tracing the history of that scheme of political power 
 which, in the result, has heen framed for the local Go- 
 vernment of India, the reader will have gathered some 
 information from the two last discourses which it is im- 
 possible to avoid partially repeating. 
 
 During the first sixty years of the existence of the East 
 India Company, after their incorporation by the Charter 
 of Queen Elizabeth, dated in the year 1600, they exercised 
 no authority which could be properly denominated a Govern- 
 ment, either in England or at any of their settlements 
 formed in India. By that Charter, and another granted by 
 King James 1st, in 1609, to a similar purport, they were in- 
 vested with such powers and privileges as have been already 
 noticed as characteristic of corporations / and they were 
 also empowered to make regulations and by-laws, agreeable 
 to the laws of England, " for their good government," and 
 to impose punishments by fine and imprisonment on offenders 
 against those by-laws. There is reason to believe that 
 an authority of this indefinite nature, expressed in such 
 general terms, was abused contrary to law ; especially by 
 those at a distance. But, as those Charters invested not 
 the Company, or any of their servants, with the power of 
 administering justice, appointing Judges, or holding Courts, 
 we can only consider these powers of regulating, and of in- 
 flicting punishment, as the means of arranging among
 
 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. 205 
 
 themselves the course by which they should pursue the 
 object of their institution, namely, their trade — under the 
 same obligation, nevertheless, which bound all other sub- 
 jects, ofappealing to the ordinary tribunals of justice to 
 enforce the observance of those arrangements by ali who 
 were members of the Company. 
 
 The peculiar nature of the settlements which the Com- 
 pany gradually formed in India — the extent of territories 
 permanently occupied, and of the population inhabiting them, 
 both British and Native, all of whom were their own imme- 
 diate servants — and the distance of these settlements from 
 the mother-country, rendered necessary the establishment of 
 some political government, directed to other objects than the 
 mere management of commercial affairs. The warlike con- 
 tests both by sea and land, not only with the Portuguese and 
 the Dutch, but also with the Native powers, had led to the 
 Company's raising and maintaining INI ilitary bodies, and to 
 the erection of Forts. And, although their settlements 
 were originally founded for the mere purpose of facilitating 
 their means of trade, and for the convenient residence of 
 their commercial servants ; and, although these settlements 
 were properly held under the laws and government of those 
 Native powers by whom they were originally granted — not 
 as the colonial establishments of an independent people 
 — but as the private property of sojourners owing obedience 
 to the supreme authority of the rulers in whose territories 
 they were situate — yet, this position gradually ceased to be 
 recognized, practically, by the Company and their servants. 
 In claiming to be governed by their own laws, and to set up 
 tribunals of their own for settling disputed rights, and punish- 
 ing crimes — in supporting the treaties and right which had 
 been granted to them by force of arms— in fortifying them- 
 Selves within their territories — they acted in all respects as 
 an independent nation. The exercise of such authorities as 
 these is quite inconsistent with the condition of subjects of 
 any state which should permit it.
 
 206 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. 
 
 But, although such was the position which had 
 been assumed by the Company and their servants in 
 India, it was not until the year 1661, that these territories 
 were formally treated by the Supreme Government of 
 England as if they had become a component part of the 
 British Empire, and that some course of rule was provided 
 for the government of the people residing therein, as though 
 they were a portion of the subjects of the British Crown. In 
 that year the Company were authorized, by a Charter of 
 King Charles 2d, to appoint Governors to govern the Plan- 
 tations, Forts, and Factories which they had established in 
 India. These Governors, with their Council, were empow- 
 ered to exercise both civil and criminal jurisdiction^ ac- 
 cording to the laws of England. They were further 
 empowered to fortify any places within their limits of trade ; 
 to raise military and naval forces ; and to make war a?id 
 peace with surrounding nations. By a subsequent Charter, 
 granted by the same King in 1683, and by another granted 
 by King James 2d, in 1686, the Company were authorized 
 to erect Courts of Justice, and to appoint a person leaned in 
 the civil law and two merchants to be judges of them ; and 
 also to appoint Courts for the trial of offences committed 
 at sea. 
 
 Such powers as these comprise all the essential functions 
 of a political government. The Charters conferring them 
 do not, however, attempt to provide any specific plan, or 
 lay down any detailed rules, for the guidance of those in 
 authority who were to exercise these powers. The very 
 general, comprehensive, and indefinite language of them, 
 necessarily, therefore, gave loose to much arbitrary discre- 
 tion, both as regards the extent of these functions of go- 
 vernment, and as regards the mode of administering them. 
 In particular, no express sanction was given for passing laws ; 
 although at the same time the exercise of legislative au- 
 thority could not be considered as clearly prohibited. If any
 
 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. OQ-r 
 
 such legislative power was granted, it would be difficult to 
 determine what were to be its limits — and no course of draw- 
 ing up or enacting laws was provided. Again j^these Charters 
 are by no means clear, as regards the parties icho are to be 
 subject to their civil and criminal jurisdiction — though they 
 would seem to imply that all persons in the service of the 
 Company, or inhabiting their settlements, were to become 
 so. Hut, if this jurisdiction was to be exercised overall 
 such, indiscriminately, and according to the laics of Eng- 
 land — there was an evident injustice in such a course, as 
 applied to the Natives, and an evident impossibility of 
 making all the laws of England operative in these foreign 
 settlements, as respects the English themselves. By the 
 general rules of the English law the Natives ought to be 
 governed according to their own ancient laws, until altered 
 by the Supreme Government under which they became 
 subjected : and, in foreign countries, Englishmen ought to 
 be ruled only by such laws as were applicable to their 
 new condition. But it is impossible to decide, upon refer- 
 ence to these Charters, how far such general rules of the 
 Epglish law were, or were not, intended to be annul! ."d by 
 them. Besides this, the Governors appointed for those 
 settlements, and those appointed to administer justices with- 
 in them (although provision had been made by the two last 
 Charters for one of the Judges to be learned in the civil 
 law) were men altogether unlearned in the laws of England, 
 if they were not in truth totally ignorant of them. We 
 cannot wonder therefore, that the history of the proceed- 
 ings of these, local governments should proclaim very great 
 abuses in the exercise of the authority delegated — and great 
 deviations from the just laws of England. Audit may be 
 accounted for, although it cannot be defended, (hat one of 
 the Governors of -the Company in England should have 
 written out to a Governor whom he had by his influence ap- 
 pointed over Bombay, '•' that, he expected his orders were to 
 " be his rules of government, and not the laws of England."
 
 208 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. 
 
 In these progressive steps towards political power and 
 the foundation of various colonies in India, the Company, 
 it will be recollected, began by establishing various small 
 factories, consisting of warehouses for their goods and re- 
 sidences for their servants, which factories were subsequent- 
 ly converted into fortified towns and enlarged by the grant of 
 adjacent territory. The first factory established was that of 
 Surat in 1612. Over this settlement was placed, under the 
 genera] authority granted to the Company by the Charter of 
 Elizabeth a President, and certain persons to assist him 
 with their advice. This body was denominated, accordingly, 
 the President and Council ; and the settlement at which 
 they assembled came to be termed the Presidency, as soon as 
 other factories were founded and placed under their control. 
 Under the Presidency of Surat were placed all the other 
 factories as they were gradually formed in the Western part 
 of India— namely, Cainbay, Ahmedabad, Gogo, and Calicut. 
 A factory, which soon after 1600 had been established on 
 the Island of Java, subsequently in 1625 formed a subordi- 
 nate factory at Masulipatam, and afterwards in 1638 another 
 at Madras ; where a Fort was immediately built under the 
 name of Fort St. George. But, in 1653, as well Masulipa- 
 tam, as another factory at Hooghly, were placed under the 
 Government of a separate President and Council at Fort 
 St. George, which accordingly became the second Presi- 
 dency constituted in India. 
 
 After the Island of Bombay was granted to the Com- 
 pany by Charles 2d in 1668, the Presidency of Surat was 
 abolished, and transferred to Bombay. This city was in 
 1687, declared by the Company to be the chief seat of 
 Government in India : all the settlements in the country, 
 including the Presidency of Fort St. George, the factories 
 already mentioned in the Western portion of India, and the 
 subsequently acquired factories in Bengal, of Pipley, Cossim- 
 bazar, and Balasore, and of Vizagapatam, and Fort St. David,
 
 PORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. 209 
 
 on the Coromandel Coast, being made subordinate to the 
 President and Council of Bombay. This general and con- 
 trolling authority of the Presidency of Bomb'ay does not, 
 however, appear to have continued long to be actually ex- 
 ercised. In 1699, the Company obtained the towns of 
 Calcutta (where a Fort called Fort William was built) and 
 Govindpore; and in 17 1.5, in consequence of the grants of 
 many commercial privileges, and of a considerable district 
 round Calcutta, by the Mogul Fmperor, that city was erect- 
 ed into a third independent Presidency under the name of 
 the Presidency of Fort William, having government over 
 all the Company's possessions in Bengal. From this period 
 the three Presidencies of Bombay, Fort St. George, and 
 Fort William conducted their course of government for 
 many years independently of each other, although in mutual 
 communication ; until, in the progress of events, the Go- 
 vernment of Bengal, as will hereafter be noticed, became 
 vested with a general and controlling power over the other 
 Presidencies, as well as with its own independent authority 
 over the immediate Presidency of Bengal itself. 
 
 In thus tracing the history of the establishment of the 
 three Governments of India at the three Presidencies of 
 Bombay, Madias, and Calcutta, we find that, from the year 
 1G00 to 1653, there existed but one Government and Pre- 
 sidency in India, which was that of Surat ; and that its only 
 political powers were derived from the general terms of the 
 Charter of Queen Elizabeth. After the foundation of the 
 Government and Presidency of Madras in 16.53, these two 
 Presidencies still governed the districts and factorie's 
 placed under the respective control by virtue of the same 
 Charter until 16(51, when their political powers were in- 
 creased by the Charter of Charles 2nd. Under these Charters, 
 and those subsequently granted in 16^3 and 1686, these two 
 Presidencies (that of Surat having in the mean time been 
 transferred to Bombay) continued to conduct their govern-
 
 210 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. 
 
 ment until the establishment of the Government and Pre- 
 sidency of Calcutta in 1715. Previous to the foundation of 
 this last Presidency another Charter had been granted in 
 1608 to a new rival Company, in which Charter was incor- 
 porated not only similar political powers and privileges, in 
 greater detail, to those which by the above noticed Charters 
 had been granted to the original Company, but also some 
 more particular rules for the conduct of their government 
 in India. As this new Company, however, did not possess 
 any territories or settlements in India, the Charter granted 
 to them had no effect in regard to regulating the Govern- 
 ments of India, until by the union of the two Companies un- 
 der this same ("barter, and by the surrender of the old Com- 
 pany of all its own previous Charters, this last Charter of 
 1608 was brought into operation. The union was not ef- 
 fected until the year 1709 : and within six years afterwards 
 the third Presidency of Calcutta was established. From 
 the time, therefore, that the union of the two great Com- 
 panies was thoroughly accomplished, all the functions and 
 powers of government granted to the united Company came 
 to be exercised at these three Presidencies — each of them 
 having its respective subordinate factories — each of them 
 under the administration of a President and Council— and 
 all of them directing their proceedings according to the 
 provisions of the Charter of 1098, and of the Statutes autho- 
 rizing and confirming those provisions. 
 
 The clauses of this Charter of 1698, are for the most part 
 directed to the formation of the new Company, to the 
 framing rules for its constitution and self-government, and 
 to prescribing the course by which functionaries are to be 
 appointed for conducting its affairs. Indeed it is upon the 
 bases of this Charter that the functions and authorities of 
 the Court of Directors and of the Proprietors, as exercised 
 at this day, are founded. At the same time the Charter de- 
 legated to the new Company, in a more specific manner
 
 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. 21 I 
 
 than the former Charters had conferred upon the original 
 Company, the commercial privileges and political powers 
 with which they were to he vested. It conferred the sole 
 right of trade. It empowered them to erect and hold and 
 govern Forts, and appoint Governors over territories. It 
 authorized them to make War and Peace with surround- 
 ing countries It conceded the important power of iv.is- 
 ing Military and Naval forces. But the pot le- 
 
 gislation was restricted within definite and narrow limits 
 — and consisted barely in providing by-laws for regulat- 
 ing their trade, and the conduct of the Company's servants 
 and others engaged in it ; which by-laws could only extend 
 to the infliction of reasonable imprisonments, or fines, 
 for the breach of them, and were required not to be repug- 
 nant to the principles of the English laws. The judicial 
 jut isdiclion to be exercised under this Charter was also made 
 definite, and greatly restricted. The Courts to be erected 
 in India were to have jurisdiction only in certain mailers of 
 minor criminality, and in civil suits connected with trade, or 
 arising out of injuries and trespasses. And no persons were 
 contemplated as subject to the jurisdiction of these Courts, 
 except such as proceeded to India or engaged in trading 
 thereto, or were members of the Company, or engaged di- 
 rectly or indirectly in their service. 
 
 On the whole, therefore, this Charter must be consi- 
 dered as limiting and diminishing the political powers ex- 
 ercised by the original Company, anil as in some degree 
 tending to subvert that national position of the English in 
 India, which it was the apparent policy of the former ('bar- 
 ters to further and uphold. But, it is to be recollected, 
 that this Charter of 1698 was framed with the view of 
 establishing a totally new Company, and a new course of 
 trade. For this new Company was without any territories, 
 or Forts, or factories in India — and, however necessary 
 might appear the political powers conferred on it, with a
 
 2]2 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OP THE GOVERNMENT. 
 
 view to their gradually attaining the permanent means of 
 trade, yet trading, and not colonizing, was the main pur- 
 pose of incorporating the new Company, and the total 
 abolition of the old Company was contemplated. It might 
 be expected, indeed, when the two Companies became unit- 
 ed, and all the territorial acquisitions became added to the 
 united capital of both Companies, that the strength and 
 extent of their political powers would have been increased, 
 with a view to the permanent maintenance of that national 
 position which had previously been founded by the original 
 Company in India. But such a policy seems for the time 
 
 to have been abandoned. Trade, and not colonization 
 
 and still less conquest— seems to have been again regarded 
 as the only true and useful object of the English connec- 
 tion with India. Moreover, the powers and authority exer- 
 cised and abused under the old Charters would ill endure 
 the scrutiny of the British Parliament, under whose control 
 the trade with India now came to be placed. These 
 reasons may appear sufficient to account for the future 
 political Government of India having thus become regulat- 
 ed under the sole and restrictive Charter of 1698, upon 
 the union of the two Companies being effected, and to 
 have suggested the surrender by the old Company of those 
 Charters under which they had advanced so far as a politi- 
 cal state in India. 
 
 Under the provisions of this Charter of 1 60S , the Com- 
 pany continued to govern their possessions and servants in 
 India until the year 1773. Various Statutes passed in the 
 mean while, continuing from time to time all the rights 
 and powers granted by this Charter. Two Charters for the 
 better regulation of the course of administering justice 
 "were also granted by the King; one by George 1st, in 1726, 
 and another by George 2nd, in 1753. But none of these 
 Statutes or Charters introduced any essential alterations in 
 the political powers of the Company, or in their mode of 
 exercising them. The vast conquests, however, made by
 
 FORMATION AND EARLIEST COURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT. 213 
 
 the Company from the year 1749 up to the year 1765, natu- 
 rally called for the attention and interference of the British 
 Government. Two temporary Statutes ware accordingly 
 passed in the years 1767 and 1769, for securing to the 
 Company the possession and government of the newly 
 conquered territories. Hut in the year 1773, the first great 
 regulating Statute was enacted for the .systematic govern- 
 ment of the British possessions in India. 
 
 Up to this period the Governments at each Presidency 
 consisted of a President and his Council. The members of 
 the Council to each Government was unlimited ; and they 
 sometimes amounted to ten, and sometimes to but two. 
 There was no prescribed course of appointing them ; and 
 still less was there any regular scheme laid down under 
 which they should conduct their government. No powers 
 whatever of legislation had ever been delegated to those 
 local Governments. There were no Judges expressly ap- 
 pointed by the King, and properly qualified, to administer 
 justice in his name among his subjects ; according to the 
 laws of England ; and as well between the Company itself 
 and others, as between the various persons living under 
 their rule. The Dewanny, or the right of collecting the 
 Revenues of the provinces of Bengal, which had been con- 
 ferred in 1765 upon the Company by the Mogul Emperor, 
 were of so uncertain and indefinite a nature, both as regard- 
 ed political power and judicial authority, that it was impos- 
 sible to say to what the Dewanny rights extended, or under 
 what limitations they were bound. 
 
 The Governments had no immediate connection with the 
 King's government in England, nor were the Governors in 
 India dependant in any manner on the King's authority. 
 In short the provisions of the early Charters and Statutes, 
 then in operation, were only adapted for the conduct of 
 trading concerns, and the regulation of good order at com- 
 mercial factories established in foreign lands.
 
 SECTION III. 
 
 Of the Progress of the English Governments of India, 
 from the year 1773 until the passing of the last Charter 
 
 Act of 1833. 
 
 The Act of 1773 was the first to establish a Governor 
 General and Council over Bengal ; who were also to ex- 
 ercise a controlling direction over the Governments of the 
 other two Presidencies. The first members of this Govern- 
 ment were named in the Act itself — and it was provided 
 that the succeeding members to be appointed by the Company 
 (during the next five years) should have the approbation 
 of the King. It prescribed the course for conducting 
 their proceedings, and laid down in general terms the ex- 
 tent of their political and legislative powers. It provides 
 for the transmission to the King's government in England 
 copies of all their proceedings. It enabled the King to 
 graut a new Charter for the administration of justice ; and 
 prescribed a very ample extent of jurisdiction to be exer- 
 cised by the new Court, the nature of the law to be ad- 
 ministered, and the quality of the Judges, as professors of 
 the English law, who were to preside in it. It further en. 
 acted many provisions for the personal conduct of the mem- 
 bers of Government, and of other high functionaries, with a 
 view to the repression of wrong and misgovernment. 
 
 Extensive and beneficial as this Act was, in first provid- 
 ing a systematic and detailed scheme for the Government 
 of British India, and the administration of justice therein — 
 it proved eminently defective when brought into operation. 
 It happened that the first members of this general govern- 
 ment differed widely upon the policy to be pursued in pub-
 
 PROGRESS OF THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS FROM 1773. 215 
 
 lie measures. The countries over which they ruled were 
 not only in an unsettled state ; but, as no regular method of 
 government had been constituted in them, *and no settled 
 laws prevailed, it was not easy to say what was legal and 
 according to order, and what was otherwise — what was 
 unjust and oppressive, and what was consistent with the 
 general welfare of the people. This naturally gave rise to 
 disputes as to the legality, as well as propriety, of the acts 
 of Government — and such disputes were aggravated by 
 others which put in question the mode of conducting the 
 authority and proceedings of the Government, and the re- 
 lative powers of the Governor and of the different mem- 
 bers. The Act, which had not been prepared in anticipa- 
 tion of the rigorous scrutiny of such disputants, nor, indeed, 
 with any mature investigation of the condition of the coun- 
 try, could little afford a solution to such difficulties as those. 
 A still greater embarrassment, however, arose to all regular 
 and effective government under this Act, from the miscon- 
 ceptions which prevailed as to the extent of jurisdiction 
 with which the Court (now first designated the Supreme 
 Court of Judicature) was invested — and, as the King's 
 Judges were entirely independent of the local Government, 
 a collision between those two authorities on such a subject 
 necessarily produced confusion throughout all its affairs. 
 
 Into the distraction of those times, both in the adminis- 
 tration (if the government and of the law, it is not expedient 
 in this discourse to enter. It is sufficient to say that they 
 gave occasion to several remedial Statutes, under which 
 the Government of British India was better regulated, and 
 the causes for dissensions gradually removed. In the year 
 1781, two Acts passed renewing for ten years, and three 
 year's subsequent notice, all the chartered rights and 
 privileges heretofore granted to the Company — regulat- 
 ing the mode of appointing the Governor General and 
 his Counsellors — defining more specifically their powers
 
 0\Q PROGRESS OF "THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS FROM P73. 
 
 and responsibilities, and exempting their official acts from 
 the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court— increasing their 
 powers of legislation, with a view to the better admi- 
 nistration of justice in the Provincial Courts, free from 
 all interference of the Supreme Court— and regulating 
 and limiting the judicial authority and mode of proceeding 
 by the latter Court. In the year 1784, the Statute was enact- 
 ed which first established the Board of Control : and 
 by the same Statute various further important provisions 
 were made for regulating the course of government in India. 
 The supreme Government, as well as the subordinate Govern- 
 ments were, each, to consist of a President and three Coun- 
 sellors ; of whom the President of Bengal was denominated/ 
 as before, the Governor General, and the other Presidents 
 Governors. One Commander-in-Chief of all the forces in 
 India was to be appointed, and a subordinate Commander-in- 
 Chief of the forces of each of the minor Presidencies — and 
 these Commanders-in-Chief (when appointed to be members 
 in Council also) were to rank next to the Governor General 
 and Governors, respectively ; but were never, unless 
 specially so appointed, to succeed to the actual government 
 as Governor General or Governor. Other provisions of 
 this Statute it will be unnecessary to notice here, as they 
 were either re-enacted, or modified, or repealed by sub- 
 sequent Acts to which I shall have occasion to advert. 
 
 In the year 1793, the time had nearly arrived when 
 (upon a three year's notice previously given) the chartered 
 powers, rights, and privileges of the Company, which, in 
 the year 1781, had been renewed for ten years and three 
 year's notice, would expire. It was then resolved by the 
 British legislature to renew all these rights, and delegate 
 the Government of India to the Company for the period of 
 twenty years. Upon this occasion the first of those 
 comprehensive acts passed, which from the extended 
 duration of the grant, and the specific detail of the
 
 PROGRESS OF THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS FROM 1773. 217 
 
 provisions for the constitution of the Company itself, and for 
 the scheme of their Government in India, came to be deno- 
 minated the Charter Acts for India. This Act of 1793 is 
 formed upon a review of all the royal Charters and Statutes 
 which had passed from time to time — and, adopting or modi- 
 fying almost the whole of them, it embodied within itself such 
 an exposition of all the Company's rights, powers, and 
 privileges, and of the system upon which the local Govern- 
 ments were to be conducted, as left but little to be searched 
 out by references to the older enactments. 
 
 Under this first Charter act, which rather consolidated 
 and amended the many previous Statutes for the Govern- 
 ment of India, than introduced any essential change in 
 its plan, the country continued to be governed until the 
 year 1813, when it was made to expire. In the mean 
 while, however, other Statutes passed directed to some 
 further improvements in its administration, without al- 
 tering its general scheme. In particular, the mode of ad- 
 ministering justice was further regulated, and the constitu- 
 tion and judicial powers of the Courts of Justice at Madras 
 and Bombay were enlarged ; and the former was in 1799, 
 made a Supreme Court with similar jurisdiction to that 
 of the Supreme Court at Calcutta. The legislative powers, 
 also, which had previously been confined to the Supreme 
 Government, were extended to the subordinate Governments 
 of the minor Presidencies. But, in 1813, the second great 
 Charter act passed granting all existing rights, powers, 
 and privileges to the Company for a further term of twenty 
 years , and occasion was again taken to modify the course 
 of government in some respects, though without introduc- 
 ing any very essential alterations. From that period until 
 the passing of the last Charter act of 1833, which has de- 
 legated the administration of India to the Company for 
 another term of twenty years, the political powers of the
 
 218 PROGRESS OF THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS FROM 1775. 
 
 local Governments were exercised with scarce any variation 
 whatever, according to the rules prescribed in the two 
 Charter acts of 1793 and 1813, and in those other less 
 comprehensive Statutes whose provisions were not modified, 
 or repealed by, or incorporated in these two more general 
 Acts. 
 
 This last Charter act of 1833 has introduced several very 
 important modifications in the scheme and course of the 
 Governments in India— at the same time it has left the ge- 
 neral plan of Government, as regulated by the two former 
 Charter acts and several other Statutes, and also a 
 great number of the specific provisions of all those Statutes, 
 in full operation. The plan and course of the- Indian 
 Governments has, therefore, to be extracted from an 
 investigation and exposition of all the existing provisi- 
 ons enacted bv these various laws. It would certain- 
 ly be very desirable that all the details of this scheme of 
 local Government should be consolidated into one well 
 arranged Statute. The mind necessarily becomes confused 
 by a reference to so large a mass of various laws, proposed 
 at distant periods, under every change of political affairs, 
 by various-minded persons, and often under the influence 
 of peculiar and temporary circumstances. So many enact- 
 ments for the self same objects, and often for the purpose 
 of mere modifications, but occasionally interspersing new 
 and important provisions, has given rise to numerous repe- 
 titions — and, what is worse, to many variations in the lan- 
 guage of clauses where no difference of meaning is to be 
 surmised. It would be a tedious, and probably an unprofit- 
 able, task to conduct the Native reader through an examin- 
 ation of the purport and tendency of these numerous 
 Statutes, with a view to trace historically the various new 
 provisions, and subsequent alterations from time to time 
 made. The chief and most comprehensive of them have 
 already been noticed for the more accurate guidance of the
 
 PROGRESS OF THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS FROM 1773. £19 
 
 learned student who may have occasion to refer to them. 
 The general reader will perhaps be satisfied by a summary 
 and systematic account of the scheme and,, quality of the 
 local Governments of India, as derived from a review of the 
 whole mass of the laws upon which those governments are 
 founded.
 
 SECTION IV. 
 
 Of the manner in which the Governments of India are. 
 constituted, and of what members these Governments 
 
 are composed. 
 
 It may be convenient for the purposes of this further 
 inquiry to shew : First, in what manner the Governments 
 of India are constituted, and of what members composed; 
 Secondly, by what course, and according to what method 
 they exercise their functions ; and Thirdly, with what pow- 
 ers these Governments are respectively invested. 
 
 First. Of these governments, that of Bengal is termed 
 Supreme. It governs the Presidency of Bengal, and exer- 
 cises a controlling and directory authority over the other 
 Presidencies of India, which are now three ; namely, Madras 
 (or Fort St. George), Bombay, and Agra, a Presidency first 
 constituted by the last Charter act of 1833. We will first 
 consider the constitution of the Supreme Government. 
 
 The Supreme Government consists of a Governor General 
 and four ordinary Members of the Supreme Council, be- 
 sides the Commander in Chief of all the Company's forces in 
 India, in case the Court of Directors shall think fit to 
 appoint him a Member ; and who thereupon becomes an 
 extraordinary Member of the Supreme Council. As this 
 body (except in one particular instance to be hereafter 
 noticed) acts in union, and by a majority, this Supreme 
 Government is termed that of " The Governor General 
 " of India in Council ." 
 
 The appointment of all the members of this Government
 
 CONSTITUTION OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. £21 
 
 is in the Court of Directors. But the appointment of the 
 Governor General is subject to the approbation of the 
 Crown, transmitted through the President o£ the Board of 
 Control. The effect of this provision is that the high 
 functionary appointed to this important post— the most 
 distinguished of any throughout the colonial dominions of 
 England — is always selected from those elevated and en- 
 lightened individuals who at once enjoy the gracious favor 
 of the Monarch, the confidence of the executive Govern- 
 ment of England, and a well founded reputation for superior 
 political talents in the estimation of the Court of Directors. 
 
 The Commander-in-Chief of the Company's forces in 
 India, when appointed to he an extraordinary Member of 
 the Supreme Council, ranks next to the Governor General. 
 His appointment as Commander in-Chief, like that of the 
 Governor General, depends on the approval of the Crown ; 
 for the vast authority entrusted to this officer of the com- 
 mand and government of an army composed of no less 
 than two hundred thousand soldiers, is of too important 
 and confidential a nature to he reposed in the absolute 
 choice of any body of subjects whatever, independently 
 of the Crown. But his post of an extraordinary Mem- 
 ber of the Supreme Council does not require the same 
 confirmation. The Commander-in-Chief is precluded from 
 ever being at the head of the government of the Presi- 
 dency of Bengal, or from ever succeeding to any absolute 
 vacancy of the Governor Generalship of India (unless 
 expressly appointed to succeed provisionally in case of 
 either of such vacancies) — hut, in case of the temporary 
 absence of the Governor General from Calcutta, the Go- 
 vernor General in Council may nominate him, or any 
 other Member of the Supreme Council, to execute his 
 functions of Governor General, during such his temporary 
 absence for the purpose of visiting any part of India, under 
 the designation of the President in Council.
 
 222 CONSTITUTION OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 
 
 Three of the four ordinary Members of the Supreme 
 Council are appointed by the Court of Directors out of 
 the Civil or Military servants of the Company, of ten years* 
 standing in their service at least ; and their appointment 
 does not require the approbation of the Crown. But the 
 fourth ordinary Member of the Supreme Council is appoint- 
 ed by the Court merely for the purpose of assisting at the 
 Councils held for the purpose of pa.ssi.7ig Laws ; and he 
 cannot interfere or vote in any other business of Government. 
 Accordingly, this Member is selected from among the emi- 
 nent lawyers of England: and, with a view to the better 
 securing that extent of professional ability (of which the 
 Ministers of the Crown are better qualified, probably, to 
 judge than the Court of Directors) this member's appoint- 
 ment must be confirmed by the approval of the Crown. 
 
 In case of any vacancy, by death, resignation, or other- 
 wise, in either of the offices of Governor General or of any of 
 the Members of his Council, the Court may appoint, Pro- 
 visionally, any Member to succeed ; so as such successor as 
 Governor General, or fourth Member of his Council, has 
 the previous approbation of the Crown. And, in case no 
 such provisional appointee happens to be on the spot to suc- 
 ceed as Governor General upon any such vacancy, then the 
 senior ordinary Member is to succeed and act until a re- 
 gular appointment is made of a permanent successor. In 
 case no such provisional appointee is on the spot to succeed 
 to the office of an ordinary member, then the Governor 
 General in Council may select from out of the Civil or 
 Military servants any person of ten years' standing to succeed 
 and act until a regular appointment is made by the Court. A 
 vacancy in either of these appointments may occur, not only 
 by death, or a formal resignation, but also by a voluntary 
 departure of either of these functionaries with a view to re- 
 turn to England, or by their being recalled by the Crown, 
 or by the Court of Directors.
 
 CONSTITUTION OF THE SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENTS. 
 
 223 
 
 A temporary vacancy of the office, as well of Governor 
 General as of the Governor of the Presidency may likewise 
 arise by the Governor General himself, suspending his own 
 functions. For it is provided, that the Governor General 
 in Council can, at any time when he thinks it expedient, 
 appoint any one of the ordinary Members of Council to be 
 Deputy Governor of the Presidency of Bengal ; and, on any 
 occasion of his absence from the seat of Government to 
 visit any part of India, he is at liberty, by a lata or regula- 
 tion to be expressly passed for that purpose, to appoint any 
 one of the Members of his Council to act as Governor Ge- 
 neral of India during such his absence, under the name of 
 President in Council. But such President in Council cannot 
 pass any laws, without the assent in writing of the Governor 
 General himself to each such law. 
 
 Such is the constitution and composition of the Supreme 
 Government of India, under all the emergencies which can 
 arise. Let us now look to the constitution of the subordinate 
 Governments of the several other Presidencies of Madras, 
 Bombay, and Agra. 
 
 The constitution of these several Governments is the same 
 in all. They each consist of a Governor and three Councillors 
 only ; and are styled " The Governor in Council of Fort St. 
 George," " Bombay," and " Agra," respectively. But the 
 Court of Directors is authorized to reduce the number of 
 Councillors, or to suspend the appointment of any Council- 
 lors whatever, at either of these Presidencies — an authority 
 which has been exercised, as regards Agra — in which case 
 the Governor of such Presidency acts alone, with all the 
 powers of a Governor in Council. 
 
 When, however, the minor Government consists (as is 
 the case at Madras and Bombay) of a Governor and three 
 Councillors, the Commander-in-Chief of the forces of
 
 224 
 
 CONSTITUTION OF THE SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENTS. 
 
 the Presidency may be one of these Councillors. The 
 others (or all of them, in case the Commander-in-Chief is 
 not appointed to be one; must be chosen from the civil ser- 
 vants only of the respective Presidencies, of twelve year's 
 standing at least. 
 
 The Governor is appointed by the Court, subject to the 
 approbation of the Crown : but the other three Councillors 
 need not have such approval ; although the Commander-in- 
 Chief, as such, must. When appointed to the Council he 
 ranks next to the Governor ; but he can in no case of vacancy 
 succeed to the office of Governor, unless specially appointed 
 provisionally so to succeed. Should the Commander-in-Chief 
 of all the forces in India happen to come into one of the minor 
 Presidencies of India on duty, he supersedes and takes the 
 place of the Commander-in-Chief of the forces of that Pre- 
 sidency, in Council— if the latter happens to a member of 
 Council, 
 
 Vacancies in the office of Governor, or of any members of 
 Council, may occur by the same means as in the case of the 
 Supreme Government. And the Court may, in like man- 
 ner, appoint provisionally to any such vacancies ; subject, in 
 the case of the Governors, to the approval of the Crown. 
 In case no such provisional appointee as Governor is on the 
 spot, the senior civil member is to succeed ; and, in case no 
 such provisional appointee is on the spot as member in 
 Council, the Governor in Council may select any Civil ser- 
 vant, who has attained the rank of Senior Merchant, to 
 ac* until a permanent successor is appointed. The Gover- 
 nor of a minor Presidency has no authority to appoint any 
 Deputy Governor, or other President of his Council. 
 
 There are two other cases to be mentioned in which per- 
 sons may become, or act as, members of either of the Go- 
 vernments in India. One is the case of a default made by
 
 CONSTITUTION OF THE SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENTS. OO5 
 
 the Court of Directors in appointing a successor, within two 
 months after they have notice of a vacancy of the office of 
 the Governor General, or of any member c/f either of the 
 Governments — upon which default the authority to appoint 
 to any such vacant office falls to the Crown ; and the Court 
 loses also the power of revoking such appointment, or of re- 
 calling the party so appointed by the Crown. The other case 
 is upon occasion of the illness or absence of any member of 
 Council, so as he should be prevented from attending any 
 particular Council held, and the Governor should desire the 
 advice of a full council upon any particular measure then to 
 be considered of. In this case the Governor is at liberty to 
 call in the Provisional Member, or, in case there be none, 
 any Civil Servant of the rank of a Senior Merchant, from 
 time to time, to attend and assist at the Council Board on 
 such occasion.
 
 SECTION V. 
 
 Of the course and Method by which the Governments 
 of India exercise their Functions. 
 
 Secondly, we have to consider by what course, and accord- 
 ing to what method, these Governments exercise their func- 
 tions : which course and method is the same, as well in the 
 Supreme Government as in the subordinate Governments. 
 
 All the acts and proceedings of the Governments are 
 done, either directly or indirectly, at meetings of the mem- 
 bers, termed Councils. Their legal validity depends altoge- 
 ther upon their being done in Council —and, accordingly, 
 the form of all their orders and resolutions runs in the 
 name of " The Governor in Council." And it is required, 
 in testification of these acts and proceedings having been 
 done by the Council Board, that they should be signed by 
 one of the Secretaries of Government. 
 
 But, although such must be the quality of their acts, that 
 they must all emanate from, or be confirmed by, some Coun- 
 cil Board- yet the members of Government are not 
 restricted to any particular formal course of transacting 
 the current business of Government ; provided only 
 that this essential qualification of all their acts and 
 proceedings be observed, namely, thatin the result they all 
 proceed from the Governor in Council. Accordingly, it 
 is usual that propositions and communications be circulated 
 in writing amongst each other, preparatory to any orders 
 or resolutions being discussed or passed at the Council 
 Board ; and a great portion of the business for the consi- 
 deration of Government, arising out of the numerous re-
 
 METHOD OF PROCEDURE BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS. 227 
 
 ports, applications, references, and addresses to Government 
 from the various functionaries of the state, as well as from 
 private individuals, are in like manner circulated amongst 
 the members of Government by the Secretaries and other 
 officers of Government, previous to any debate or decision 
 come to upon them in open Council. 
 
 Neither is there any particular form, according fo which, 
 the sentiments of each member of the Government may 
 be expressed, or according to which the final resolution 
 or decision of the Government is to be framed. For each, 
 member can either verbally at the Council Board, or by 
 his signature in favor of or against any resolution, or by 
 any representation at large in writing (commonly termed 
 his Minute) freely, and according to his own method,, 
 deliver his sentiments for the consideration of the Board 
 — and in the more important matters (especially when 
 there is a difference of opinion) these minutes are usu- 
 ally recorded, not only with a view to the more deli- 
 berate and mature attention of the other members of 
 the Government, but with a view to the final notice of 
 the authorities at home. Indeed, it may truly be said, that 
 these minutes are often recorded for the instruction of pos- 
 terity. For among them are to be found a vast number of 
 documents (many of which have been printed) so abounding 
 in maxims of political wisdom, and in information upon all 
 topics connected with the history and prosperity of this 
 country, that they are scarcely surpassed by the public 
 records of any nation. Those who have had access to 
 these excellent works can with difficulty repress the expres- 
 sion of their admiration of the genius and character of 
 those distinguished men — the truest benefactors of this land 
 — who have thus recorded their eminent services to their 
 country and to mankind : and it seems a kind of duty im- 
 posed on the writer of these pages to offer to the veneration 
 of his readers the names of dive, of Warren Hastings, of
 
 228 METHOD OF PROCEDURE BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS. 
 
 Cornwallis, of Wellesley, of Lord Hastings., of Munro, of 
 Fullerton, of Elphinstone, of Malcolm, and of Bentinck; 
 although their reputation cannot be increased by any notice 
 from him. 
 
 The Council Board is competent to act when the Gover- 
 nor General or Governor and one Member is present, in all 
 matters, except in the passing of laws; for which latter 
 purpose the Governor General and three ordinary mem- 
 bers of the Council of India at least must be present. 
 
 It is the privilege of the Governor General or Governor, 
 at every Council, first to propose any measure to be dis- 
 cussed and disposed of — and, afterwards, any of the other 
 Councillors may propose other subjects for consideration. 
 r I he Governor can, however, by his own sole authority ad- 
 journ, if he thinks fit, the further discussion of any such 
 matter proposed by a Councillor to a future day ; but not be- 
 yond forty-eight hours, nor more than twice. The objects 
 of these regulations are two— first, to enable the Governor 
 General or Governor to bring forward such questions with- 
 out delay which he himself judges of the most urgent 
 importance, and to secure timely and calm attention to 
 propositions of doubtful policy — and secondly, to preclude 
 the Governor by his own sole authority from preventing 
 the free introduction, and the certain and prompt disposal, 
 of such questions as any member of his Council may deem 
 worthy of the Government's attention. 
 
 All measures are passed by common consent, or else by 
 a majority of votes — and, in case of ah equal division, the 
 Governors have a casting vote. If, however, any measure be 
 proposed which, in the opinion of the Governor General or 
 Governor, is of essential importance to the interests of the 
 Company, or to the safety and tranquillity of the state, and 
 expedient either to be carried or to be wholly rejected, and
 
 METHOD OF rilOCEDUEE BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS. OOQ 
 
 the whole Council present shall dissent, from the opinion of 
 the Governor — in this case, a discretionary authority is giv- 
 en to the Governor to carry or reject the measure by his 
 own sole decision. This independent and discretionary 
 authority has been given in consequence of many disputes 
 and contentions between the Governors and their respect- 
 ive Councils which formerly occurred, and which, though 
 usually ending in favor of the Governor's policy and autho- 
 rity, yet greatly impaired the vigour and dispatch of the 
 public measures. But, as, on the other hand, such a power 
 might tend to arbitrary Government, and weaken the inde- 
 pendence and weight of the Council, it has been guarded 
 with cautious restrictions. And, first, the question must 
 be one of the highest emergency and importance, affecting 
 in the greatest degree the public welfare. Secondly, all 
 the members of Government must state their respective 
 reasons in writing — so that it will appear whether, on the 
 part of the Council, their opposition is founded on any 
 factious, or personal, or other than a sincere public ground ; 
 and, on the part of the Governor, whether his decision is 
 actuated by sound judgment, or at least a regard for the 
 public w^al : and all parties will have the best means of 
 hire deliberation on the proposed measure. Thirdly, it 
 is expressly declared by Statute that the Governor, and he 
 alone, is to be responsible for the measure so carried, or 
 for the negative so passed against the measure proposed. 
 Fourthly, this sole authority does not extend to any act 
 which it was not legally in the power of the Governor in 
 conjunction with his Council to carry. Fifthly, three espe- 
 cial case9 are excluded from any such sole decision ; name- 
 ly, 1st, any act in their j'udi vial capacity ; as when adjudi- 
 cating as an Appellate Court upon any matter of right or of 
 crime— 2ndly, the making, or repealing any law or regula- 
 tion — or 3rdly, the imposing any lax or duty. These two 
 last acts of authority can, however (under the provisions 
 of the last Charter act of 1833) only bo exercised by the
 
 230 METHOD OF PROCEDURE BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENTS. 
 
 Governor General of India in Council; and, consequently, 
 the restrictions upon them do not any longer apply to the 
 Governors of t.he subordinate Presidencies. It is further 
 to be observed, that this power in the Governor of acting 
 by his sole discretion is not confided to any Governor act- 
 ing during any temporary vacancy ; and that the Court 
 of Directors are authorized to suspend the exercise of this 
 sole discretion, as often, and for as long a time, as they 
 think fit. 
 
 It remains only to note, under this head, that the Governor 
 General of India in Council may appoint from time to time 
 any place in India at which the Council of India may as- 
 semble ; and, when they shall happen to assemble within 
 either of the minor Presidencies, the Governor of that Pre- 
 sidency becomes an extraordinary member of the Council 
 of India. The Governor General may also, when absent 
 from Bengal, and without his Council attending him, issue 
 his orders and instructions to the Governments of either of 
 the Presidencies, or to any of the officers or servants serving 
 under them ; and which orders and instructions are to be 
 obeyed in the same manner as if they had issued from the 
 Governor General in Council. He is directed, however, 
 immediately to send copies of his orders, so issued on 
 his own sole authority to any such officers or servants, to 
 the Governments to which such officers or servants belong ; 
 and also to send copies of such orders and instructions, 
 whether sent to the Governments or to such officers, to the 
 Court of Directors ; and to state his reasons and induce- 
 ments for issuing them. And he alone is to be responsible 
 for all acts done under such orders or instructions.
 
 SECTION VI. 
 
 Of the Powers exercised by the Governments of India 
 
 and, first, of the Superintending and Con' rolling 
 
 powers of the Supreme Government. 
 
 Thirdly. In the third place we will consider of the 
 functions and powers with which the several local Govern- 
 ments in India are invested, With this view we will first 
 notice those of the Supreme Government of India— and, 
 next, those of the several other Governments, including 
 that of the Presidency of Bengal. For, although the 
 particular government of the Presidency of Bengal is ad- 
 ministered by the self-same functionaries who preside over 
 the Supreme Government of India, and these functionaries 
 cannot consequently act under the control of any local 
 superior, yet, when the members of the Supreme Govern- 
 ment act merely as the Governor and Council of the parti- 
 cular Presidency of Bengal, they exercise precisely the same 
 powers and functions in respect of the Government of that 
 Presidency (with the exception of any reference or obedi- 
 ence to a superior local authority) as those which the 
 Governors in Council exercise over the other subordinate 
 Presidencies. 
 
 The powers of the Supreme Government of India in the 
 control and direction of the subordinate Governments were 
 originally much more limited than they are at present. 
 Those which were first assigned to the Government of Ben- 
 gal, by the Statute passed in the year 1773, were confined 
 to interferences in those matters only which affected the rela- 
 tions of the other Presidencies with other Native states. 
 The Government of Bengal was to have " the power of
 
 O^O CONTROLLING TOWER OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 
 
 u superintending and controlling the Governments" of the 
 other Presidencies, in so far that it should not he lawful for 
 them to make, war or peace, or any treaty with any Indian 
 State, without the previous consent of the Bengal Govern- 
 ment ; except in emergent cases, when there might not be 
 time to communicate with the Supreme Government. And 
 it was further provided that the subordinate Governments 
 should constantly transmit to that Government advice of 
 all their transactions in matters relating to " the Govern- 
 " merit, revenues, or interests of the Company." 
 
 But another Statute, which passed eleven years afterwards, 
 in the year 1784, considerably increased, and at the same 
 time more specially defined, these superior powers of the 
 Bengal Government. It was by that Act provided, that the 
 Bengal Government should " superintend, control, and du 
 (l rect" the Governments of the other Presidencies " in all 
 " points which relate to any transactions" with the Native 
 powers, or to war or peace, or to the application of the 
 revenues or of the forces of these Presidencies in time of 
 war ; and also in all points specially referred by the Court 
 of Directors to such controlling power. And the subordi- 
 nate Governments were directed to obey all orders, whe- 
 ther they might judge them to be on the above points or 
 not, unless they contradicted express orders from the Court 
 of Directors, themselves, which had not come to the know, 
 ledge of the Supreme Government. These contradictory 
 orders they were to communicate to the Bengal Govern- 
 ment, if occasion arose, who would thereupon issue their 
 further instructions. It was further provided, that no subor- 
 dinate Government should declare war or peace, or make 
 any treaty with another state, except in pursuance of an ex- 
 press order from the Supreme Government — unless in cases 
 of sudden emergency. 
 
 It was soon after considered that even these powers of
 
 CONTROLLING POWER OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. O33 
 
 superintendence, control, and direction were not sufficient — 
 for, by the first great Charter act which passed in 1793, 
 this power of control and direction was extended, not only 
 to all transactions with other states, the making war and 
 peace, and all treaties — but also, to the collection and ap- 
 plication of the revenues of the other Governments, and to 
 the employment of their forces at these Presidencies, with- 
 out any restriction as to time of war— and the Act further 
 provided, in general terms, that the Bengal Government 
 should exercise these powers in all points which related " to 
 " the civil or military government of those Presidencies." 
 
 It would be difficult to say what particular measures of 
 government were to be considered as excluded from the 
 control and direction of the Supreme Government constitu- 
 ted by the comprehensive terms of this Statute. But that 
 some acts and powers of the subordinate Governments were 
 intended still to be exempted from the interference of the 
 Supreme Government seems clear from this — that provision 
 is again made, by this Act for the obedience of the subordi- 
 nate Governments, although a doubt should arise whether 
 the orders of the Supreme Government had reference to 
 those points under its superintendence. N\ e may, perhaps, 
 justly consider all the acts of the subordinate Governments 
 in the current administration of justice according to the 
 laws of the country and the regulations of Government, and 
 all their appointments to offices, as exempt from this con- 
 trolling interference, 
 
 However this may be, the consciousness of the Supreme 
 Government that its controlling powers wore under some 
 limitations, not exactly defined, begat a caution and a re- 
 serve in interfering with the ordinary course of Government 
 in the minor Presidencies, and directed that interference 
 chiefly, if not altogether, to those affairs more specifically 
 noticed in the Statutes which have been referred to —
 
 °34 CONTROLLING POWER OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 
 
 namely, the negotiations and treaties with Native states, 
 the declarations of war, or the making of peace, and the em- 
 ployment of tho military forces as the general interests of 
 the Indian Empire might suggest. In almost all other 
 respects a general latitude and discretion was reposed in 
 the subordinate Governments to carry on their adminis- 
 tration according to the course provided by the laws ; and 
 subject only to the control and direction of the Home 
 Authorities of the Court of Directors and the Board of 
 Control. 
 
 The next Charter act, of the year 1813, made no change 
 in the relative authorities of the supreme and subordi- 
 nate Governments ; and for the course of forty years, from 
 the year 1793 to the year 1833, this limited and guarded 
 measure of superintendence and direction continued to 
 be observed by the Government of Bengal. But in the 
 latter year a policy seems to have prevailed with the Minis- 
 ters of England of better uniting and consolidating the 
 Governments of India, and of giving greater consistency 
 and uniformity to all the public measures in the adminis- 
 tration of the Indian Empire. It is probable, also, that 
 it was judged expedient to remove at once all doubt and 
 difficulty as to the extent of the controlling powers of the 
 Supreme Government, by at least enabling it to direct 
 its interference towards all political objects whatever, 
 which, consistently with the powers confided to the local 
 Governments of India, could occupy the attention of the 
 newly arranged Supreme Council of India. The last 
 Charter act of 1833, accordingly provides, in the fullest 
 terms, that the Supreme Council of India shall have the 
 superintendence, direction, and control of the icliole 
 civil 8nd military Government of India, generally — " with 
 t! full power to superintend and control the Governors and 
 " Governors in Council of the other Presidencies, in all 
 c< points relating to the civil or military administration of
 
 CONTROLLING TOWER OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 235 
 
 " those Presidencies ;" and these Governments are " hound 
 " to ohey the orders and instructions of the Governor. 
 " General in Council, in all cases whatsoever. There are 
 now no limitations to the Supreme Government's power of 
 interference, either in respect of doubts of the subject- 
 matter on which its orders are to be given, or as regards 
 any supposed contradictory orders from the Court of Di- 
 rectors, or from any other authority. 
 
 The result, therefore, of this constitution of the Supreme 
 Government is — that, as regards the Presidency of Bengal, 
 it governs the affairs of that quarter of India without any 
 other restriction or control than such as are supplied by 
 the direct provisions of the Statutes which lay down general 
 rules for its measures and course of administration, or 
 which are supplied by the express orders of the Court of 
 Directors, delivered as from themselves, or as communi- 
 cated from the Board of Control. But, as regards the 
 subordinate Presidencies, the Supreme Government of 
 India may either allow of their exercising the functions de- 
 legated to them, without interference, or it may prescribe 
 general rules and principles according to which those functi- 
 ons are to be exercised, or it may expressly and specifically 
 direct, or reject, or annul, any particular measures — in which 
 latter case the members of the subordinate Governments 
 become, in truth, nothing more than the agents or .Ministers 
 through whom the governing authority acts.
 
 SECTION VII. 
 
 The same subject continued : History and nature of the 
 Legislative powers of the Supreme Government. 
 
 The second peculiar power of the Supreme Government 
 of India is that of Legislation. It may appear expedient 
 to trace a little more at large than has been hitherio done 
 the origin and progress of this power of Legislation in the 
 local authorities of India, which is now confined solely to 
 that of the Governor General of India in Council. 
 
 All powers of enacting laws or regulations were at first 
 limited, as we have seen, to the Company itself — ihat is to 
 the Directors or Governors of the Company, who had the 
 entire government of its affairs. The first Charter of Eli- 
 zabeth, dated in 1600, having reference merely to the for- 
 mation of a trading Company, and not to a political colony 
 dependent on the British Crown, authorized no other course 
 of legislation than that which might be necessary for the 
 good conduct of all the members and servants of this new 
 trading corporation — and the rules and regulations they 
 were empowered to enact, with a view to that object, were 
 limited to the imposition of moderate fine and imprison- 
 ment, as penalties for the breach of such regulations. This 
 Charter gave no power to try, or to erect Courts for the 
 trial of, such breaches. 
 
 When colonies had been actually established in various 
 par's of India, the Charters of Charles 2d, and of James 
 2d, in the years 1661, 1683, and 1686, gave general juris- 
 diction to administer justice according to the laws of Eng- 
 land, and to erect Courts for that purpose. Accordingly
 
 LEGISLAL1VE POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 937 
 
 these Courts were empowered to judge of the breaches of 
 the Company's rules and regulations, and to impose the 
 punishment affixed for such breaches, as w.ell as to try all 
 other civil or criminal suits. But no express extension of 
 the power of legislating for the people of the newly acquir- 
 ed .settlements was conferred on the Company, and still 
 less upon either of the local Governments of India ; although 
 there is every reason to believe that far greater powers of 
 law-making, as well as of law-administering, were in reality 
 exercised under these Charters to the Company, than 
 either they or the laws of England in any way sanctioned. 
 
 Upon the surrendering all the previous Charters, and 
 uniting with the new formed Company started in 1G98, 
 all the rights, powers, and privileges, of the United Com- 
 pany (and among them, of course, that of legislating) came 
 to be altogether regulated and defined by the provisions of 
 the Charter of that date, and those of the Statutes giving 
 effect to such Charter. The powers of legislation, by these 
 provisions, was expressly limited to the Company itself — 
 and extended no farther than to the regulating the conduct 
 of their servants and others engaged in carrying on their 
 trading affairs, and to the imposing fine and imprisonment 
 for breach of such regulations — which were not to be re- 
 pugnant to the laws of England. 
 
 These were the only powers of legislation ever granted 
 to the Company — save such as were subsequently delegat- 
 ed to if acting through the local Governments in India. 
 But the acquisition of the extensive territories in Bengal 
 and in the neighbouring districts necessarily led to the 
 formation of some regular scheme for the government of 
 those territories, which should also comprise some authori- 
 ty in the local government of enacting laws. This power 
 was accordingly conferred by the first great regulating Act 
 for the Government of India, passed in the year 1773.
 
 233 LEGISLATIVE POWEHS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 
 
 It is observable, however, that, although the territorial 
 possessions attained by the Company at this period in 
 India, and reduced under the direct administration of 
 their local governments, formed in reality a populous 
 Empire composed of several ancient kingdoms ; and, 
 although the whole civil and military government of all the 
 states was confided to the supreme and subordinate 
 Governments which had been established — yet the pow- 
 er of legislation confided to the local authorities was 
 confined to the narrowest limits. It was a power con- 
 fined to the Bengal Government only, and extended no 
 farther than to <e the settlement at Fort William and other 
 " factories and places subordinate thereto." It follows 
 that all those other territories, which, by conquest or treaty 
 became annexed to the British dominions, and were subject- 
 ed to the administration of the local Government of that 
 Presidency, to which each portion of these newly acquired 
 territories was attached, were required to be governed 
 according to the existing laws of that scheme of power, 
 which had theretofore prevailed. Neither the Company 
 itself, nor either of its local Governments, had authority to 
 enact any wewlaws or any new course of government. For it 
 is a principle of the constitutional law of England that, when 
 a new country is added to the dominions of the Crown, 
 the people of that country are to be governed according 
 to their old laws, un til they are changed by the supreme 
 authority of the state— and that all English subjects who 
 come to reside within this new country are to be governed 
 by their own laws, as far as they are applicable to their 
 circumstances in that country. 
 
 Confined as this legislative power of the Supreme Go- 
 vernment was to the local limits of the settlement of Fort 
 "William, and of the factories and places subordinate to 
 that settlement, it was also narrowly restricted in point 
 of extent. It reached no farther than to the making rules,
 
 LEGISLATIVE TOWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. Oj9 
 
 ordinances, and regulations for the good order and civil 
 government of this settlement and its subordinate fac- 
 tories, the breach of which were to be punished by fines 
 or forfeitures. They were to be " just and reasonable," 
 and " not repugnant to the laws of England ;" and they 
 were not to be valid or of any force, unless or until they 
 were consented to and recorded by the Supreme Court of 
 Judicature by the same Statute erected at Calcutta : and 
 provisions were made whereby all parties might have the 
 opportunity of being heard before that Court, and after- 
 wards by appeal from the decision of that Court, in objection 
 to any such laws which should be proposed. As the force 
 of such laws operated only by the course of punishment^ 
 they were limited to such as were of a penal nature, and 
 for the repression of public offences— and could not affect 
 any private rights, or the course of justice as regarded pro- 
 perty and claims between man and man through civil 
 sails. And, as the amount 'of punishment which could 
 be awarded was to consist only of fine or forfeiture, these 
 laws could only have reference to such offences against 
 " the good order" of society as were of a petty or trivial 
 description. In short, the power was merely that of better 
 preserving the public peace and good behaviour by the en- 
 actment of such Police Regulations as either the English law 
 had not provided, or which (if existing) could not well be 
 made applicable in this country, x^ccordingly, when an 
 increased and more unlimited authority was conferred on 
 the local Governments of making " Regulations" for the 
 general administrations of justice in the provinces through- 
 out India, these law.s, which were thus enacted for the 
 better preservation of good order at the immediate spats of 
 government, came to be termed " rules, ordinances, and 
 regulations," by way of distinguishing them from those 
 laws of a more general efficacy, which were passed for the 
 Governmenfof the provinces and were termed " Regula- 
 tions :" and these " rules, ordinances, and regulations"
 
 240 LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 
 
 are now more commonly known by the term of " Police 
 Regulations." 
 
 It may appear extraordinary that, considering the condi- 
 tion of the various nations over which the full powers of Go- 
 vernment were now to be exercised in the name of the 
 Company, no greater authority for legislation was entrusted 
 by the Statute ofl773, to the local authorities than such as 
 have been explained. The English subjects, indeed, were 
 few ; and those were all of them in the immediate service 
 of the Company. But still, even with regard to them, it 
 would be found impossible to apply all the laws under 
 which they had been governed, and enjoyed their rights in 
 England, to their altered position in India— and it has al- 
 ways, in fact, proved a hopeless task to ascertain which of 
 the laws of England did strictly apply to them, and what 
 were clearly inapplicable to them in the circumstances under 
 which they were placed. But, with respect to the Natives 
 — a large class of whom were made by this Statute subject 
 to the laws of England generally — and the rest of whom 
 had been for ages before governed at the mere despotic 
 will of their rulers, and amongst whom the settled rules of 
 justice were few, and the method of administering the law 
 almost discretionary — it would seem that the power of de- 
 claring what laws did not apply, and what should, and what 
 should be the course of administering justice, as well as the 
 power of providing new regulations according as the altered, 
 and still changing, condition and circumstances of the peo- 
 ple might suggest, was essentially requisite ; and that the 
 authority of Government could never be complete, nor 
 operate effectually to the public benefit without it. Even 
 the slender power of passing Police regulations of a certain 
 minor quality proved to be reduced to an inferior degree 
 than what was intended, in consequence of the indefinite 
 and obscure terms of the language in which the authority 
 was granted. For the requisition of the previous " consent
 
 LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 241 
 
 and approbation''' of the Supreme Court, gave to that tri- 
 bunal a power of rejecting laws on account of any supposed 
 inexpediency — although the members of t\\e Court, not 
 being concerned in the passing of the laws, or being made 
 acquainted with the grounds of them, were obviously incom- 
 petent to form a true judgment of their expediency. More- 
 over, no accurate decision could even become to, as to 
 what parts of Bengal, other than the seat of Government 
 itself, were intended by the terms " factories and places su- 
 " bordinate to that settlement"— and, consequently, the power 
 of legislation exercised under this act, has always been confin- 
 ed to the immediate Presidency itself. And, lastly, it be- 
 came a continual contest and difficulty to discern what of 
 these proposed u rules, ordinances, and regulations" were 
 " repugnant to the laws of England," and what were consist- 
 ent with such laws. Rules and principles were, indeed, 
 from time to time laid down by the Courts, as disputes and 
 appeal arose, by which this repugnancy or otherwise wa3 to 
 be judged — but no act of the legislature ever settled such 
 rules and principles. It more than once happened that 
 while one Court rejected a proposed laws, for being as " re- 
 "pugnant to the law of England" as " light was to dark- 
 •* ness" — (which was an expression used by a judge in re- 
 jecting a regulation restricting the liberty of the press) 
 another Court approved of and recorded the selfsame laws, 
 as in no manner contradicting either the letter or princi- 
 ples of the English law. 
 
 Nevertheless under this legislative power of the local 
 Governments, and this only, were British subjects — and also 
 all Natives while resident icithin the limits of the 
 ral immediate Presidencies, or seats of government — 
 ruled until the late Charter act of 1833. The subordinate 
 Presidencies of Madras and Bombay, indeed, possessed no 
 legislative power whatever, to be exercised over British 
 subjects, and others resident at those Presidencies, until the
 
 242 legislative towers of the supreme government. 
 
 year 1807— when precisely the same power was conferred 
 on those Presidencies, in precisely the same terms, for passing 
 " rules, ordinances, and regulations for the good order and 
 " civil government of the Towns of Madras and Bombay, 
 " and the factories and places subordinate thereto." 
 
 But, as regards the Native people resident out of the 
 immediate Presidencies, or, as it is phrased, in the Mofus- 
 sil, the necessity of a more enlarged power of legislation 
 soon began to be felt. In the progress of the eight years, 
 from the passing of the first regulating Act for the local 
 Government of India in 1773 until the year 1781, a conti- 
 nued series of disputes between the Supreme Court of 
 Judicature first established in the former year/ and the 
 Government's Provincial Courts, in respect of the legality 
 or otherwise of the judgments by the latter Courts, put an 
 end to all regularity and all safety in the administration of 
 justice. The Parliament of England at once perceived the 
 nature of the remedy to be applied ; and, while it restrict- 
 ed within appropriate bounds the extent of jurisdiction to 
 be exercised by the Supreme Court, and particularly ex- 
 empted all judicial acts of the Mofussil Courts from its 
 interference, it conferred on the local Government of Bengal 
 a power of legislation for the provinces of that settlement, 
 which, in effect, comprised every subject-matter of laws. 
 In the year 1781, the Governor General of Bengal was 
 authorized to enact " Regulations for the Provincial Courts 
 " and Councils," which were to be " of force and authority 
 " to direct the said Provincial Courts" — subject to revision 
 by the executive Government of England. The extent of 
 this legislative power, showing it to be in truth a general 
 authority, appears sufficiently from a subsequent Statute 
 passed in the year 1797 ; which— after noticing that regula- 
 tions had used to be passed by the Governor General in 
 Council" for the better administration of justice within 
 « the provinces/' whereby the Natives of India had been 
 
 •
 
 LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 943 
 
 u 
 
 made acquainted with the privileges and immunities 
 granted to thpni by the British Government" — proceeds to 
 provide, that all such regulations " affecting ihe rights, per- 
 " sons, or property of the Natives or others \\ ho are amenable 
 " to the Provincial Courts should be registered, and form- 
 " ed into a regular code, and that the grounds of each 
 " regulation should be prefixed to it." It was not, how- 
 ever, till the year 1799, that the Government of Madras was 
 enabled to pass laws " for the Provincial Courts and Coun- 
 " cils ;" nor until the year 1807, that similar authority was 
 conferred on the Government of Bombay — in which last 
 year both those subordinate governments were likewise 
 empowered, as before noticed, to pass " rules, ordinances, 
 " and regulations" (subject to being registered in the Su- 
 preme Court) for the " good order and civil government" of 
 the immediate Presidencies. 
 
 General as this legislative authority was assumed to be 
 by the respective Governments of India, there were two 
 subjects of legislation on which doubts from time to time 
 arose as to their being comprehended within it — namely, 
 the right to make laws for the government, of Native sol- 
 diers, and for their trial by Courts- Martial, and the right 
 of making laws for taxation of the people of India. It 
 may have been argued, that the power of making laws, with 
 a view to the administration of justice, had reference to the 
 ordinary course of justice as between all classes of the 
 people equally — and not to any special course for a 
 peculiar class, such as soldiers, who were to be governed 
 in a c;reat degree by arbitrary discretion, whose first duty 
 was undisputing obedience, and whose conduct was to be pro- 
 nounced upon by the judgment of military persons, judg- 
 ing without the form's of the ordinary Courts. And, with 
 respect to taxation, it may have been conceived that, for 
 a government (without, some express constitutional autho- 
 rity — existing from old custom, or from a direct allowance
 
 044 LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 
 
 of the highest legislative power of the state) -to take at its 
 own arbitrary will any portion to itself of the property of 
 the people, weuld be rather an overthrow and subversion of 
 law and justice, than an enactment for the furtherance of 
 either. 
 
 Still, the local Governments had, without scruple, been 
 used to make regulations as well for the purpose of taxa- 
 tion, as for the government of their Native armies by 
 martial law. The right of taxation was, at last, expressly 
 conceded by the legislature of England by the Charter 
 act of 1813. But this power — in itself sufficient, unrestrain- 
 ed, to constitute an absolute despotic government — was re- 
 stricted, as regards the imposition of new taxes, and the 
 increase of existing taxes, on exports, imports, and transit 
 of goods, to passing laws with the previous consent and 
 sanction both of the Court of Directors and the Board of 
 Control. By another Statute, passed in 1814, all previous 
 regulations for imposing and levying taxes were declared 
 legal and valid. By the Charter act of 1813, the power of 
 making regulations and articles of war for the govern- 
 ment of the Native army, and for the trial of Native 
 soldiers and officers is specifically delegated to the res- 
 pective Governments of India — and all former regulations 
 made with this view are confirmed as legal and operative. 
 
 Such were the legislative powers exercised by the several 
 Governments of India until the time of passing the last 
 Charter act of 1833. But they had been found defective 
 and insufficient. They did not extend to the passing of 
 laws which might affect the Supreme Courts, and their 
 authorities, and jurisdiction — neither did they extend to 
 the making of laws, which should have operation within 
 the immediate Presidencies ; except in matters of mere 
 police, as has been already explained — nor could any even 
 of these latter regulations be passed without the sanction
 
 LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 245 
 
 of the Supreme Court itself. By the last Charter act of 
 1833, however, an ample and more independent legislative 
 authority is created ; but, instead of beipg distributed 
 among all the local Governments, it is concentrated in the 
 Supreme Government of India, with a view, not only to 
 the greater political strength and competency of the body 
 enacting the laws, but to the more general uniformity ia 
 the laws themselves. 
 
 Full power, accordingly, is given to the Governor General 
 of India in Council to make, repeal, and alter all kinds of 
 laws and regulations for the government of India, and for 
 the administration of justice therein; which may operate 
 throughout all parts of British India, which may regulate 
 all Courts of Justice, as well the Supreme Courts as all 
 others ; and none of which shall need any sanction from 
 those Courts. The following are the restrictions and 
 limitations imposed on the exercise of this legislative power. 
 First, all laws made are to be subject to the sanction of the 
 Court of Directors — which Court is subject itself to the 
 orders of the Board of Control. Until, however, they are 
 repealed by such authorities, they are (with the exception 
 of some hereafter noticed) to be operative — so that laws for 
 taxation no longer require the previous consent of the 
 Court of Directors. Secondly, no such laws are to affect, or 
 to be deemed to affect, the full Imperial power of the British 
 Parliament to pass laws for India, and to repeal or al- 
 ter any laws made by the local Government. Thirdly, 
 no such laws are to be contrary or repugnant to the 
 Charter act itself of 1833 — or to any future Slatutes, or 
 to the Statutes already made for the government of British 
 soldiers. Fourthly, no such laws are to affect the Preroga- 
 tives of the Crown (which have been enumerated and ex- 
 plained in the second Discourse) — or those constitutional, 
 fundamental, laws of the whole British Empire, which re- 
 quire the obedience of every subject of the British Crown
 
 045 LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 
 
 to its government and laws — which obedience is termed 
 his allegiance. Fifthly, no such laws are to affect or alter 
 any of the rights or powers conferred by the Govern- 
 ment and Crown of England on the East India Company 
 itself — as represented by the two bodies of the Court of 
 Directors and the Court of Proprietors. Sixthly, no such 
 laws are to impose the punishment of death on any British 
 subjects, without the previous sanction of the Court of Di- 
 rectors. And, Seventhly and lastly, no such laws are to 
 abolish either of the Supreme Courts of India, though they 
 may regulate them, and the law and course of justice to be 
 administered by those tribunals. Such is the nature and 
 extent of the second peculiar power of the Governor General 
 of India in Council.
 
 SECTION VIII. 
 
 The same subject continued', of other peculiar powers 
 of the Supreme Government. 
 
 The third peculiar power of the Supreme Government is 
 that of transacting all affairs, of negociating all treaties, and 
 of making war or peace, with foreign states. Such affairs and 
 treaties, we have seen, can only be carried on, or comple- 
 ted, under the express orders of the Supreme Government, 
 except any sudden emergency should arise — and, the better 
 to ensure this superintendence and control, the Act passed in 
 the year 1784, requires that any such treaty made with a 
 foreign state by, or through the medium of a subordinate 
 Government, should in the body of it contain a clause making 
 the treaty conditional on the ratification of t lie Supreme 
 Government. An important and memorable restriction is 
 imposed by the same Statute on the exercise of this power 
 even by the Governor General himself. That Act solemnly 
 declares that, " to pursue schemes of conquest and extension 
 u of dominion in India, are measures repugnant to the wish, 
 " the honor, and policy of the British nation." It, accord- 
 ingly, prohibits the declaration of war, or the commencement 
 of hostilities, against any people, or the guaranteeing 
 the possessions of foreign Princes, without the express com- 
 mand and authority of the Court of Directors — except in 
 those cases in whicb.it shall appear that war has been com- 
 menced, or preparations made for war, against the British 
 nation, or against any other nation which the local Govern- 
 ments have engaged to defend. And in these excepted 
 cases the Supreme Government is directed, at the earliest 
 opportunity, to convey all requisite information of its pro- 
 ceedings to the Court of Directors.
 
 248 CONTROLLING POWERS OF THE SUPREME GOVERNMENT. 
 
 The fourth peculiar power of the Supreme Government is 
 that of directing the collection and application of the Beve- 
 nues of all India. This power is, in its nature, of a very gene- 
 ral and of a controlling quality. A large portion of the reve- 
 nues of India is specifically appropriated by Statutes — as 
 in the paying of dividends to the Proprietors of stock, the 
 maintenance of the forces, and the salaries of the high func- 
 tionaries of the Indian Governments. Almost all the rest 
 is required for the current and ordinary expenditure of the 
 several Governments, according to the course provided for 
 their administration. The occasions, therefore, for its spe- 
 cial directions are few, compared with those in which each 
 local Government is left to apply the financial resources of 
 the country to the exigencies of the public service. Still, it 
 has been thought expedient that the Supreme Government 
 should have power, not only to lay down general rules for 
 all extraordinary expenditure, but also upon occasion to 
 interfere, expressly, either in prohibiting, or in directing, 
 particular modes and amount of outlay. And this is a 
 power that is much and often practically exercised. 
 
 The fourth and last peculiar poiver of the Supreme Go- 
 vernment that appears necessary to be noticed, is that of 
 directing the employment of all the military forces of 
 India. This, also, under ordinary circumstances, is rather 
 a controlling than a directory power. But it is obviously 
 requisite that, as emergencies arise, the supreme local power 
 of the state should have the active direction, as well as the 
 general superintendence, of its armies.
 
 SECTION IX. 
 
 The same subject continued : of the powers exercised by the 
 Subordi?iate Governments. 
 
 The last subject of this discourse is the consideration of 
 the functions and powers of the Subordinate Governments 
 of Madras, Bombay, and Agra ; including also such of those 
 of the Presidency of Bengal as are not obviously merged 
 with the peculiar powers of the Supreme Government itself. 
 
 And, first, their legislative functions are now confined to 
 the mere preparation of drafts or projects of regulations, 
 which are to; be submitted to tjie Supreme Government, 
 together with their reasons for proposing them ; and upon 
 which the Supreme Government is required to form and 
 communicate its resolutions. 
 
 Secondly, the subordinate Governments have the appoint- 
 ment to all offices held in the respective Presidencies : 
 among which is the office of a Justice of the peace, whose 
 authority is exercised, not in the name of the local Govern- 
 ment, but in the name of the Queen herself. 
 
 But, it is to be observed, that the Presidency of Agra has 
 no distinct establishment of civil or of military servants, but 
 that those appointed to" the Presidency of Bengal may hold, 
 as before, offices in either of those two Presidencies. All 
 these principal offices in the state (with the exception of 
 that of a justice of the peace) — both civil and military — are 
 at present filled by those who are nominated to the service 
 of the Company in India by the Court of Directors. But,
 
 250 POWERS OF THE SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENTS. 
 
 although the persons nominated by the Court of Directors 
 to such service, and eventually appointed by the local Govern- 
 ments to such offices, have hitherto been those subjects 
 of the British Empire termed British subjects, by way of 
 distinguishing them from the Asiatic subjects, still there is 
 lio restriction imposed by the law under which India is go- 
 verned, either upon the local Governments or upon the Court 
 of Directors, against the appointment of Natives. This 
 may probably be new and appear incomprehensible to many 
 Native readers of this work. No one instance has ever 
 been known of a member of the Native community having 
 attained to any office which could be held by a civil ser- 
 vant, or to any step of that rank in the army , which a 
 commissioned English officer holds. But the last Charter 
 act has nevertheless declared, " that no Native of the ter- 
 ** ritories of British India shall, by reason only of his reli- 
 « gion, place of birth, descent, colour, or any of them, 
 «< be disabled from holding any place, office, or employment, 
 " under the Company." 
 
 "What, then, are the grounds of disqualification which 
 prevent members of the Native community attaining the 
 very highest stations which can be aspired to in the govern- 
 ment or service of the Indian Empire ? They are these 
 only. That a certain quality of civil offices are by the 
 standing rules of the Court of Directors to be filled by such 
 only as are by them nominated to the Civil service of India 
 as Writers ; and by Statute it is ordained that no person 
 shall be appointed to the Civil service, as a writer, unless he 
 shall have been educated at Haileybury College in England. 
 But both the rules of the Court of Directors, and the Sta- 
 tute requiring this course of education, are founded on this 
 principle — that by force of such provisions those who are 
 sufficiently qualified by mental cultivation, by loyalty to the 
 British Government, and by moral integrity, are likely to 
 be furnished for the service and preservation of the Indian
 
 NATIVES LEGALLY COMPETENT TO OFFICES. 251 
 
 Empire. And on the same principle is the supply made by 
 the Court of Directors of certain persons, denominated Ca- 
 dets, out of whom only those military officers 'of the Native 
 army are to be appointed who are to hold any rank from that 
 of Ensign or Cornet upwards. While, therefore, the Court of 
 Directors shall continue to enforce these provisions for the 
 supply of persons to fill the higher classes of civil and military 
 office, the local Governments, who owe obedience to the 
 orders of this Court, must conform to them. At the 
 same time it is unquestionable, that, should the policy 
 appear sound, a?id lending to the real prosperity of the 
 country, and should the just and necessary qualifications 
 exist, there is nothing in the present laics under which 
 India is governed, which should prevent the Court of Di- 
 rectors from nominating any Native to even the highest post, 
 military or civil, in their disposal ; or which should preclude 
 that Court from nominating any Native to enter their 
 service, generally, as a writer, who should by possibi- 
 lity have gone through the requisite course of educa- 
 tion at Haileybury ; or which should restrict that Court 
 from nominating a Native as a cadet. Nay, further — 
 there is nothing in the law or constitution of the Indian 
 Governments which should preclude a Native from attain- 
 ing the highest office in Tndia, conferred by the Queen of 
 England, such as that of a Judgeship even of the Supreme 
 Court— so only that such Native should by his mental and 
 moral qualities, and by his acquirements, prove himself to be 
 competent to the duties of it. 
 
 That the appointment to these superior offices, both 
 Civil and Military, should have been constantly confined to 
 British subjects must be explained by the history of past 
 events, and the political necessities of the country, as well 
 as by the condition of the people. But the period seems 
 approaching when this policy will appear no longer neces- 
 sary or expedieut. So long as the struggle for dominion
 
 252 NATIVES LEGALLY COMPETENT TO OFFICES. 
 
 was maintained among rival powers, whose success depended 
 only on the sword — so long as the British Empire in India was 
 unsettled and unstable, its institution forming, and its 
 scheme of administration new — so long as the whole body 
 of the people were strangers to all systematic government 
 founded on the supremacy of regular laws, ignorant even of 
 its principles', unenlightened by education, and as yet unat- 
 tached by feeling to the British rule — it would have been 
 obviously premature, and indeed absurd, to have opened 
 the attainment of influential office to the Natives so recent- 
 ly subjected to the British rule. It would have been at once 
 to have abandoned the country to civil war and destruction, 
 or to have consigned it to the grasp of some other foreign 
 dominion. But, with the diffusion of knowledge and intel- 
 lectual cultivation, has sprung up a sense of the benefits 
 of a liberal and well regulated government, and some con- 
 viction that the prosperity of the country must depend on 
 the permanency of its strength*. The spirit, of faction— and 
 even that of social repulsion — has been gradually allayed. 
 And, at. last, public institutions are forming, not only for the 
 general elementary education of the people at large, but for 
 imparting literary, scientific, and professional proficiency, 
 calculated to raise Native qualifications to a level with the 
 resources of the country, and the capacities of the people. 
 
 It is not to be doubted, therefore, if the Native commu- 
 nity shall be true to themselves and their real interests, that 
 all the offices of state, and in the administration of the af- 
 fairs of the country, will be gradually open to their ambition, 
 in proportion to their proved competency to sustain them. 
 As regards the Military rawAheld by British subjects, it will 
 perhaps be long before the members of the higher classes of 
 the Native community will desire to share the responsibili- 
 ties of such posts. They may probably consider it most 
 conducive to the military strength of the Empire, and most 
 consistent with their own habits and avocations in life, that
 
 POWERS OF THE SUBORDINATE G 0VERNMENT5. 253 
 
 the Native army should be composed of that quality of men 
 who now embrace that line of public service ; and that 
 they should be led into the dangers and enterprises of war 
 by the same energy and skill that has for a long series of 
 years shed a glory on the Sepoy arms. But, as regards the 
 offices and honors of civil life, the ambition of the superior 
 Natives, who are qualified and well-affected towards the 
 British Government, naturally grows in proportion to 
 their right to attain them. It is sufficient to say that, as 
 well the local Governments as the Imperial Government of 
 England, and its functionaries the Court of Directors, have 
 recognized this right so founded ; the rest must depend on 
 the character, the public spirit, and the exertions of the 
 Native people themselves. 
 
 Thirdly, may be mentioned the very limited authority 
 reposed in the subordinate Governments of transacting 
 affairs, and negociating treaties^ with foreign Native states, 
 and of declaring war or making peace with them. This 
 authority they can only exercise (as we have seen) in cases 
 of emergency. All such negociations must under ordinary 
 circumstances be conducted by the Supreme Government — 
 and all treaties entered into by the subordinate govern- 
 ments in extraordinary cases must be made on the face of 
 them subject to ratification by the superior Government. 
 Neither can any local Government, Supreme or Subordinate, 
 declare war (except in the circumstances of necessity which 
 have been already noticed) without the express orders of the 
 Court of Directors. 
 
 The fourth function of the subordinate Governments to 
 be adverted to is that of the government and direction of 
 the army belonging to each respective Presidency— which 
 military government is administered, mainly, through the 
 Commanders-in-Chief of each Presidency. It is to be remark- 
 ed, however ; that the Presidency of Agra has no separate
 
 254 POWERS OF THE SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENTS. 
 
 and distinct military establishment ; and accordingly, for 
 all military purposes, that Presidency is still considered, as 
 before, a portion of that of Bengal. The Supreme Go- 
 vernment has (as we have seen) the power of superseding 
 the ordinary course of governing and directing the armies 
 of the other Presidencies, by itself directing the application 
 and employment of those forces, under commanders of its 
 own appointment. This, however, is an authority never 
 exercised except with a view to the employment of those 
 forces in active service. But in time of peace, and in the 
 active duties of the armies within the precincts of their 
 own Presidencies, the subordinate Governments conduct 
 the whole of the responsible and important duties of the 
 Military, as they do those of the Civil Government. 
 
 Fifthly, the subordinate Governments have the ordinary 
 management and disposition of the revenues of their re- 
 spective Presidencies. In 4 his financial administration, 
 however, they have, first, to observe those requisitions 
 of Statutes which have expressly regulated the general ap- 
 plication of such revenues ; and, secondly, to obey the spe- 
 cial orders, as well of the Court of Directors as of the 
 Supreme Government, in this department of their duties. 
 
 Sixthly, it rests with the Governments of Calcutta, 
 Madras, and Bombay, to fix the boundaries of the Towns of 
 those names, and extend the limits of them, as expediency 
 may seem to require. The districts composing the terri- 
 tories of each Presidency are to be settled from time to 
 time by the sole authority of the Court of Directors ; and 
 any order of the local Governments fixing the limits of the 
 Towns of Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay, must also have 
 the previous sanction of that Court. This authority for 
 limiting the boundaries of the seats of these local Govern- 
 ments is founded on various Statutes, which enabled those 
 Governments to make regulations for the municipal or in-
 
 POWERS OF THE SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENTS. 355 
 
 ternal police government of those Towns, and which have 
 made the jurisdiction of the Supreme Courts co-extensive 
 (as regards Natives) with those limits. • 
 
 Such, then, are the various functions and powers entrust- 
 ed to the local political authorities of India (subordinate 
 and supreme) for the administration of the whole Civil and 
 Military government of the British Empire established in 
 that country. Many details, as well in respect of these 
 powers, as in respect of the constitution and form of 
 these Governments and the method in which they act, have 
 in a work of this nature been necessarily omitted. They 
 can only be learned, thoroughly, by a reference to the copious 
 volumes of Statutes and Regulations, and to the several 
 works explaining and commenting upon them. But, it is 
 trusted that a general and intelligible account of the scheme 
 of these Governments has been given, sufficient for all the 
 ordinary objects of such information, and well calculated 
 to form the basis of that further and more accurate acquain- 
 tance with the subject which professional or official duty 
 may impose.
 
 SECTION X. 
 
 Reflections on the quality of the system of Government 
 in India ; and notices of some defects. 
 
 And, now that the reader has; arrived at the con- 
 elusion of this division of my labours, it may per- 
 haps interest him to cast a glance over the course he has 
 passed, and to pause in reflection on the quality of that 
 knowledge he may have gained, 
 
 If he shall be induced once more to review with studious 
 consideration those doctrines of political Government which 
 have been summarily expounded in the first of these discours- 
 es, he may probably find his facility of comprehending them 
 increased, and his conviction of their soundness confirmed, 
 by the practical information derived from the ensuing 
 pages. On the other hand, a just conception of those prin- 
 ciples which lie at the base of all well constructed govern- 
 ments, will serve forcibly to impress on his understanding 
 the origin and quality of that system of local Government 
 under which the Empire of British India is administered. 
 
 It will be found that the Government of the British do- 
 minions, throughout all their extent, is a consiste?it whole. 
 The constitution of England is the grand source of every 
 plan of political administration established in each portion 
 of those dominions. Over that administration the constitu- 
 tional powers of the British Government hold a constant 
 and an operative superintendence. But the English con- 
 stitution is not a mere gigantic fabric, without proportion or 
 symmetry — resting on no other foundation than its own 
 weight, or the arbitrary will of its founders. Its parts so
 
 QUALITY OF THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDIA. g.57 
 
 correspond and fit with each other as to manifest political 
 judgment and skill of the highest order, expanded through 
 many generations upon its construction. It ,js reared upon 
 the foundations of human nature itself in its social relations, 
 and of human reason as applied to those relations. 
 
 Whether the English constitution be, or be not, founded 
 on the just principles of Government — and whether there 
 be, or be not, that correspondence between its fundamen- 
 tal rules, and the true ends of Government, viz. that happi- 
 ness of the people, which consists in the perfect enjoyment 
 of private rights and acquisitions, and personal security from 
 wrong — can only be determined by ascertaining what those 
 just principles are, and then by a thoughtful comparison 
 between those principles and those constitutional rules. An, 
 easier, and if not a surer, perhaps a more satisfactory, judg- 
 ment may be formed of the tendency of those rules, from a 
 consideration of their effects. JFor undoubtedly the effects 
 of those rules are apparent in a greater measure of political 
 strength , prosperity, glory, and intellectual advancement than 
 has ever befallen a nation through the history of mankind. 
 It is a judgment formed from such sources as these which 
 must qualify a subject of the British Crown to serve the poli- 
 tical interests of the nation with effect — it is such a judgment, 
 alone, which can inspire him with that loyalty to the Prince, 
 and that permanent and rational attachment to the institu- 
 tions of his country, in which true patriotism consists. 
 
 Although considerations such as these may appear to de- 
 mand some stretch of thought and of reflection, yet the 
 commonest attention 'to the details of the preceding dis- 
 courses must suffice to shew the intimate bo/id of connection 
 between the plan , of the local Governments of India, 
 and the general system of government under which 
 the whole British Empire is ruled. The Supreme Govern- 
 ment of India (as it is called; and the subordinate Govern-
 
 258 '.QUALITY OF THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDIA. 
 
 ments of the Presidencies, are all constituted and regulated 
 by British Statutes — and to (he British Parliament are all 
 Indian functionaries responsible for the just exercise of 
 the powers entrusted to them. The Company is no 
 more than a body of our own fellow subjects, through 
 whom (subject to the control of a Board composed of 
 another body of our fellow subjects) — acting ordinarily 
 by their appointed Governors and officers— -the adminis- 
 tration of the Indian Governments is carried on. This 
 Company consists, as we have seen, of an associated number 
 of Proprietors of India Stock, whose chief and almost 
 only active duty is that of electing from among themselves 
 such qualified persons, who are to act on behalf of the 
 whole Company, in the exercise of those authorities en- 
 trusted for a time by the Parliament of England. But 
 it is obvious that the Parliament of England might have 
 selected any other body of our fellow subjects, to wield 
 the same powers as are reposed in the Company — subject 
 to the same control and the same responsibilities. The 
 legislature might have selected another body of Electors 
 than such Proprietors— it might have selected at. once, and 
 "without any election by others, a certain number of in- 
 dividuals, who, as Directors, or under any other name, 
 should have conducted, as the highest active authority, 
 the Civil and Military government of India ; and who might 
 have to conduct it upon a different plan, and through the 
 medium of different Governors and officers, than is at 
 present ordained. It is plain that the system of govern- 
 ment for India, is only a method and a medium, through 
 which the Supreme Government of England governs a 
 portion of the subjects of the British Empire — in the same 
 way as that Supreme Government, to a certain extent, 
 regulates the course of authority exercised in certain cities 
 and districts of England itself. 
 
 But it is not enough to observe that the Governments in
 
 QUALITY OF THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDIA. 259 
 
 India have been modelled on the basis of the English con- 
 stitution—has been regulated through the same legislative 
 authority which dictates the course of Government in Eng- 
 land — and depends altogether upon such future interference 
 of the British legislature as may be deemed from time to 
 time expedient. The form and frame of the Indian Go- 
 vernments are so planned, that the system of policy pur- 
 sued by them, and all their general and important measures, 
 are influenced, and often directed, and always controlled 
 by the self-same Councils which rule the political adminis- 
 tration of the European portion of the Empire. This re- 
 sults from the institution of the Board of Control, as a con- 
 stant operative power in the scheme of our Indian Govern- 
 ment. For the President of that Board, being himself by 
 virtue of his office one of the Queen's Ministers — and the 
 majority of the Board itself being composed of others of 
 those Ministers — it must follow that this Board, in the 
 actual exercise of its superior 'powers in the government 
 of India, must conform both to the general views and ex- 
 pressed wishes of the existing Ministry of England. Thus 
 the great national measures undertaken through and by the 
 local Governments of India become — like all others pursued 
 by the Executive Government of England — the subjects of 
 debate and revision by the British Parliament. On the 
 approbation, or otherwise, by that august assembly of the 
 national measures and general course of policy under which 
 India is ruled, the question of a continuance, or of a change, 
 of the Queen's Ministers may depend — in the same 
 manner (though not in an equal degree) as upon the 
 approbation, or otherwise, by that body of the measures 
 of the ministry in the internal administration of Eng- 
 land itself. For instance, the late war in Afghanistan 
 was undertaken under the influence, if not the immediate 
 direction, of the English Ministry, and upon their res- 
 ponsibility. And many even of suck projects as are li- 
 mited to general improvements in the condition of the people
 
 260 QUALITY OF THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDIA. 
 
 — such as a change in the system of taxation, a better digest- 
 ed code for the administration of justice, or a comprehensive 
 plan of national education — can scarcely be entertained 
 without the concurrence and support of the same Ministry. 
 
 When, therefore, it is commonly said that the terri- 
 tories of India are governed by the Company— and that the 
 people of India live under the Company's Government— and 
 when we hear of the distinction of Native subjects, and of 
 British subjects— we ought to have a right comprehension 
 of the meaning of these terms. The people of India live 
 under the Company's Government, as the people of England 
 live under the Executive Government, the body^ of the 
 Queen's Ministers. The Company, as represented by the 
 Court of Directors acting through their officers, are no more 
 than a body of our fellow subjects appointed according to the 
 constitutional scheme of power laid down by the supreme 
 authority of England, to govern India in conformity with 
 the fundamental rules established for its government. 
 And, in like manner, the Ministers of the Queen of England 
 are a certain body of our fellow subjects appointed according 
 to scheme of the English constitution, for the government of 
 the English Empire in conformity with the fundamental rules 
 of that constitution, and in strict observance of the Statutes 
 ordained by the supreme authority of the realm. The people 
 of India, like the people of England, are all subjects of the 
 Queen, and not of the Company. If some of the Queen's 
 common subjects settled in India are termed Native sub- 
 jects, and others British subjects, it is because justice, and 
 the equal benefit of all, require that different laws, and a 
 different mode of administration of those laws — with special 
 reference to peculiar customs, religious tenets, and habits — 
 should regulate private rights ; and therefore some term for 
 distinguishing the different classes of the Queen's subjects 
 became necessary. But this distinction does not imply that 
 a different measure of protection in the enjoyment of private
 
 QUALITY 01' THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDIA. 05^ 
 
 rights, and of security from personal wrong, is dealt out to- 
 wards the separate classes — or even that the law and con- 
 stitution of the Indian Governments recognize any difference 
 in the political rights and privileges of the one class over 
 the other. A consideration of the qualifications of the can- 
 didates for offices and honor, and a judgment to he exercised 
 by the regular appointed authoritits bearing rule over this 
 country upon such qualifications, are the only principles of 
 selection which are founded on the law of the land. The 
 Englishman arriving in India submits himself to the self- 
 same rules and course of government as bind his native 
 fellow subject — the Native, should he visit England, par- 
 takes in common with his British fellow subject every poli- 
 tical, social, and legal right. 
 
 In contemplating the various gradations of authority— the 
 multiplied dependencies — and the checks upon checks — 
 which characterize the scheme of the Indian Governments, 
 many who have little reflected on the just principles of Govern- 
 ment, on the tendencies of all political power to abuse, and on 
 the facilities of evading responsibility by rulers governing at a 
 distance from the supreme organs of the State, may deem 
 that scheme too complicated for effectual management, and 
 that a greater simplicity would impart a proportionate increase 
 of strength and national prosperity. But the perfection of a 
 work is not so much to be judged of by the simplicity of its 
 construction, as by the facility and exactness of its operations-) 
 The most stupendous of machines, the steam engine, pre- 
 senting to the eye of ignorance a confused mass of combina- 
 tions, and of intricate, movements, directed to a multitude of 
 diverse objects, is yet so precisely fitted in all its parts, and 
 its motions so appropriately adjusted through all their 
 series to the prime impelling force, that its gigantic task 
 may be accomplished under the guidance of one man's 
 hand. And, in like manner, the grand machine of politi- 
 cal Government may be constructed of powers so propor-
 
 2QO QUALITY OF THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN INDIA; 
 
 tioned to the duties assigned, so regulated in their de- 
 pendencies on each other, and so intimately connected to- 
 gether by a common bond of union, that the direction 
 of its mightiest, and of its most minute, motions can 
 receive its impulse as from one single mind. The scheme 
 of Government for British India works well. The su- 
 preme influence of the British constitution is felt through- 
 out the whole system. So long as the rulers and the offi- 
 cers engaged, according to their various gradations, in the 
 administration of the Indian Governments proceed in the 
 correct and ordinary discharge of their duties, there arises 
 no intermeddling to embarrass, nor is much occasion taken 
 to occupy vainly the public attention, or that of the supreme 
 authorities of the State. But, should any design be con- 
 ceived, or any enterprise be undertaken, affecting the na- 
 tional welfare — should the Collector project an improve- 
 ment of the national revenues, or the judge suggest an ame- 
 lioration of the laws — these is a just consideration en- 
 sured to these undertakings throughout all the organization 
 of Government, up to that of the British Parliament itself. 
 It is seldom that such beneficial labors have failed in secur- 
 ing for their authors public honors, and more conspicuous 
 duties. On the other hand negligence, malpractices, and 
 public wrongs can hardly escape notice, retribution, and 
 redress. 1 he public voice is instantly lifted up against them. 
 The scrutiny of a connected gradation of responsible au- 
 thorities is called forth in judgment upon them. And 
 these are the surest testimonies of a good and efficient sys- 
 tem of government — that the national energies have room 
 to expand, while oppression stands r rebuked before the 
 frown of authority. 
 
 But it is not the object of these discourses to glorify the 
 system of Government for British India ; but rather to en- 
 able the reader to form an intelligent judgment upon it. 
 It may not be, therefore, altogether unbefitting such de- 
 sign to point at even its defects, when they appear obvious.
 
 SOME DEFECTS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 2G3 
 
 I shall close this discourse by noticing two that seem to he 
 such. 
 
 1st. — Having regard to those just principles of Go- 
 vernment, which it was the object of the first of these dis- 
 courses in some measure to set forth, it will be remarked 
 as a violation of those principles, that any man, or body of 
 men, should be maintained in wealth and luxury, out of the 
 toil and property of the people, as public and national objects 
 of expenditure, who have no public duties to perform, or who 
 are unable or unwilling to perform them adequately. But 
 the Government of British India — compelled originally by 
 the force of circumstances which still have their influence — 
 fosters in no small degree this violation of just political prin- 
 ciples. 
 
 I wish not to speak particularly here of that support afforded 
 to various Native powers, by which the dominion of certain 
 families is upheld over the people, without any interference 
 being conceded on behalf of the interests of the people them- 
 selves against the misgovernment of their rulers. This char- 
 acteristic of the British policy — prompted solely by 
 a regard to the interests of England — may be disas- 
 trous enough to those Native states who suffer under 
 it. By removing all check upon misgovernment through 
 the intervention of the people themselves, the ruler is 
 encouraged in abusing his power for his own private 
 objects. His sense of the dependence, both of his own 
 authority, and of his people's prosperity, on the inter- 
 ests and will of a more powerful nation, deadens within him 
 all hope of raising his country to the level of a rivalry (which 
 might be thought dangerous) — and all desire to govern well 
 at the good pleasure of another power, and at the risk of its 
 disapprobation. The people, in the mean while, submit and 
 crouch down under the utmost severity of oppression — 
 for they cannot effect a change by a revolution in their own 
 Government ; nor can they overthrow the treaties by which
 
 26£ SOME DEFECTS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 
 
 they are rejected from becoming subjects to another Go- 
 vernment. These treaties are not made with the nation on 
 their public behalf; they are rather made with their ruler on 
 his private behalf. But this is a topic of more concern to 
 other states than to our own. 
 
 But the British Government sustains within its own ter- 
 ritories numerous sovereigns, who are such only in name — 
 and who, being neither subjects nor rulers, are bereft indeed, 
 through the vigilance exercised overall their actions, of all 
 power to do mischief— but at the same time are incapacitated 
 through such control from doing good — and are doomed to 
 lead a life of indolence and unmeaning pageantry, which, if 
 not a burden to themselves, is at least an almost intolera- 
 ble burden to their country. These are dignitaries who, 
 sprung from ancestors once the real rulers over the country, 
 are now left to be supported by the common toil and resour- 
 ces of the people, although tjie objects for which such con- 
 tributions were made have long since ceased. If, indeed, 
 these personages, upon losing all real authority as monarchs, 
 had surrendered also the rank and pretensions of royalty, and 
 had been content to become dignified subjects, in possession 
 of ample means to maintain the highest position in society — 
 it had been well for their own true interests, and well for 
 those of their people. Neither would the public welfare have 
 been affected by the apportionment of an amount of the 
 public property sufficient for such objects. But, then, all 
 that vain expenditure wasted upon thrones and courtiers, 
 where there is no Government — and upon magistrates and 
 functionaries who have no duties— might be spared for 
 more rational purposes. Those who held their property, 
 and their rank in society, upon the same terms of being res- 
 ponsible to the opinions of society and to the laws for the 
 propriety and usefulness of their lives, in the same manner 
 as all other subjects under a regular Government, would 
 at least be independent of all that other andyar more enslav*
 
 SOME DEFECTS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 2G5 
 
 ing control to which, in the unreal capacity of sovereigns, 
 they are placed in suhjection. There would then be some 
 probability that their fortunes might be expended upon 
 objects in which the rest of the public might have an interest 
 as well as themselves, and which would be productive of be- 
 nefit in advancing the arts and general industry. It might 
 be expected that a contrary course of mere unmeaning waste 
 and extravagance would be persisted in only so long as 
 neither sense nor self-interest had any influence. 
 
 As it is, the common resources and means of the people 
 are exhausted by a constant drain productive of no common 
 or public advantage whatever. A sort of double govern- 
 ment is maintained, one for the public purposes of the state, 
 and another for empty show, and the enforced sloth of a 
 royal court without subjects. Vain pageantry and idle 
 amusement become of necessity the only occupation of such 
 a court. For he that enjoys the rank of a monarch, is at 
 the same time deprived of all power of interference in the 
 business of the state — and, claiming to be above the law, and 
 under no responsibility for his conduct, he is not allowed 
 the same freedom of action, or even the same liberty of ma- 
 naging his own means, as is conceded to the ordinary sub- 
 jects of Government who are under the restraint of the law, 
 It must be plain that it would be the same thing if the peo- 
 ple of a country were to tax their labour, and contribute 
 their wealth, to fill up the sea, as to bestow it in nourishing 
 the pomp and wastefulness of such as can render no services 
 to the public, nor even share in their common interests. It 
 is to be observed that it is not a large amount of properly 
 thus .surrendered once for all — ample to support its possessor 
 in all the affluence and dignity which is consistent with the 
 highest station of a subject — and granted in consideration of 
 power formerly held and duties formerly performed. It is the 
 unceasing and certain expenditure of an enormous portion of 
 the public revenues of the slate for sustaining the false splen-
 
 250 SOME DEFECTS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 
 
 dour of a royal establishment. No nation can make any 
 prosperous progress under such a load. Those resources 
 which might be devoted to public works, to extending the 
 means of communication, to the encouragement of the arts, 
 to fertilizing the soil, and to the spread of education, are al- 
 most all swallowed up. 
 
 But this is the result of public treaties — of treaties made 
 with the former rulers of the land— not, indeed, made for the 
 public benefit of their people, but made for the private bene- 
 fit of themselves. But the faith of public treaties must ever be 
 observed : and, so long as the people can endure the injustice 
 of them, and those with whom such treaties have been made 
 shall deem it for their interest also that such endurance shall 
 continue, the faith of such treaties will be observed. The 
 evil of them is, nevertheless, a truth — and a truth which 
 should be known. For the time may come when the real 
 advantage of all parties concerned may combine with their 
 common desire for their modification. 
 
 2d. The other defect in the system of Government for 
 British India, which I would notice, is the want of any plan 
 of political representation. 
 
 It will be remembered that an endeavour was made in the 
 first of these discourses to establish, as one essential princi- 
 ple of just government, that the People should have a 
 share in itr, administration. That share was shown to 
 consist, partly in the means afforded to the bulk of the 
 people of attaining to the offices and honors of the state, 
 and partly in the means afforded them of influencing and 
 co-operating in the actual measures and proceedings of the 
 supreme authority itself. The exercise of this last species 
 of express share in the administration of the Government, 
 it was shewn, could only arise out of some well organized 
 system of representation through election. And, in the
 
 SOME DEFECTS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 267 
 
 second of these discourses, an illustration of such a system 
 was attempted by explaining that of the British constitu- 
 tion. 
 
 Upon the nature of that share in the administration of 
 the Government which the people of India possess or may 
 attain to, and which consists in the access afforded to all 
 classes, according to their qualifications, to the honors 
 and offices of the state, I have perhaps already observed 
 sufficiently in this present disccurse. But we look in vain 
 throughout, the system of government fur India for any 
 trace of that share which the people of India can only exer- 
 cise through some plan of political representation by the 
 election of Representatives. It remains to offer some re- 
 marks on the resulting disadvantages. 
 
 They may be gathered by the reflecting inquirer from 
 that portion of the first of these discourses to which the 
 reader's attention has just been diiected. A full and com- 
 plete system of representation, such as has been there 
 pourtrayed, and such as our fellow subjects in England 
 enjoy under its constitution, cannot be reasonably or bene- 
 ficially advocated for India. Such a system would not be 
 compatible with the present condition of the people, nor 
 with the necessary security and strength of the Government. 
 Its great distance, moreover, from the seat of Empire, 
 and the place of Parliamentary assembling, presents diffi- 
 culties in the details of any arrangement, not easy to be 
 overcome. But these considerations may not appear suffi- 
 cient for abandoning all efforts at introducing some practi- 
 cal approach to a better constitution of the Indian Govern- 
 ments, ^o long as the whole body of the Native commu- 
 nity of India are without representatives in the supreme, 
 or even in the subordinate, councils of the nation — so long 
 are they without adequate means of exposing the mischiefs 
 of any measures of misgovernment, or of suggesting those
 
 2G8 
 
 SOME DEFECTS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 
 
 which may be most conducive to the national prosperity. 
 It is only from the people themselves that rulers can 
 faithfully be taught the good and evil effects of their policy 
 before it is too late. While the people do but grieve and 
 silently submit, public and common disasters become the 
 only monitors. It is doing little to give free liberty of 
 printing, and invite the general attention to the quality and 
 tendency of laws before they are passed. A public 
 cannot be thus created for any practically useful purpose. 
 The people require a common bond of union ; some suffi- 
 cient organ through whom their sentiments may be made 
 known, and their interests be vindicated. Such are politi- 
 cal representatives, having constant communion with those 
 who appoint them. It would be their especial task to 
 watch on behalf of those whom they represent— it would 
 be their express duty to protect them against unjust or 
 erroneous measures— and it would become their peculiar 
 glonj to advance the prosperity of that country whose des- 
 tinies are confided to their care. It is only by some means 
 of political representation that the common interests of 
 the people of both these portions of the English Empire 
 can be identified, and their union as fellow subjects be per- 
 manently fixed. These means are at present wanting to the 
 people of India ; but it is no vain expectation that they 
 will before long be supplied.
 
 DISCOURSE VI. 
 
 On Jurisprudence : or the Principles 
 of Administrative Justice. 
 
 o 
 
 F the quality of the Virtue of Justice ; and of the 
 
 quality of the Science of Administrative Justice. Of 
 the nature and object of human laws for the adminis- 
 tration of Justice. Of the origin and nature of Pro- 
 perty. Of the transfer and succession of Property 
 Of the security of the Person. That the laws on 
 which Administrative Justice is founded should be 
 clear and certain. In what manner laws should 
 specify and define rights. Of the Civil Code, for 
 the restoration of rights, and the redress of wrongs. 
 Of the Criminal Code for the Punishment of wrongs. 
 That revenge is not a just principle or object of la us 
 for the punishment of Crime. Of what is the legi- 
 timate object of human Punishment. Of the Code of 
 judicial procedure : its nature and objects. Of the 
 evils arising from a defective method of judicial 
 procedure. That the laivs of a country ought to de- 
 pend on certain general principles; and be arranged 
 according to some system — the knowledge of which 
 forms a Science. Of the quality of the English sys- 
 tem of law. Of the causes of litigation independent- 
 ly of the quality of laws. Of the expediency of 
 reducing the laws of a Country into a systematic 
 Code.
 
 DISCOURSE VI. 
 
 On Jurisprudence : or the principles 
 of Administrative Justice. 
 
 SECTION I. 
 
 Of the quality of Justice as a Virtue, and of the quality 
 of the Scie?ice of Administrative Justice. 
 
 w. 
 
 HAT is Justice ? What does (hat term imply in 
 the English language ? What are the ideas and meanings 
 called into our mind by the word ? What are the terms 
 employed in the various languages of the earth to express a 
 notion comprehending so much signification among men of 
 cultivated understanding and virtue ? 
 
 These are speculations of weight and interest to all ele- 
 vated minds. They concern, and they more or less in truth 
 occupy, the thoughts of every rational being. The simplest 
 savage has a sense of what has contradicted, or of what has 
 accorded with, some principle or idea of Justice, or fairness, 
 towards himself or his neighbour. lie confines his notion 
 of justice to the few circumstances attending, or giving rise 
 to, the personal pain, or the personal privation, or the perso- 
 nal pleasure, he is capable of or exposed to. He probably, 
 has no general term in use by which he can communicate 
 that notion, apart from the actual thing suffered or enjoyed. 
 But the civilized man,— a member of human society in its 
 most exalted state,— the man of meditation and refinement, —
 
 272 
 
 OF JUSTICE AS A VIRTUE. 
 
 casting his reflections over the vast variety of human actions 
 and passions in the innumerable relations of civilized life, 
 seeks for some general term or expression by which he can 
 characterise that quality which is common to an infinite 
 multitude of the acts and feelings of mankind, and which ia 
 his mind he considers to be the quality of justice. 
 
 So soon does the necessity of this classifying term arise, 
 as the relations of social life and of Government are enlarg- 
 ed, that a nation hardly deserves the name, nor can be con- 
 sidered as emerged from barbarism, whose language pos- 
 sesses no special word to denote some ge?ieral idea of justice, 
 apart from the term denoting any specific act itself which 
 may be considered just. And, in proportion as "a nation 
 extends the various relations of social life, and has advanced 
 in intellectual cultivation, will the significance of the term 
 justice be extended, and comprehend a larger variety of 
 applications. 
 
 In its general signification among the best cultivated and 
 most intelligent of mankind, the term justice includes many 
 more applications than are appropriate to the immediate 
 object of this discourse. It may be said, indeed, to include 
 every duty we owe in social life to every class and quality of 
 our fellow creatures. 
 
 For if justice consists in conceding to every man what 
 God or our conscience declares to be his due, it is a virtue 
 which requires of us neither to grasp at, nor to withhold, 
 nor even to entertain designs against, his property — it re- 
 quires that we should lend our help to our fellow creature* 
 in that same proportion as we feel we may fairly look for 
 it from others— it requires that we should respect the very 
 feelings of others, so that we should inflict no mental distress 
 for the sake of our own gratification — it requires that we 
 should protect and advance those who by nature, or by the
 
 OF JUSTICE AS A VIRTUE. 273 
 
 circumstances of life, are made dependent on us— and, to ac- 
 complish these our duties, it requires of us such strict regard 
 to truth, as that no paltry fears or interests should induce a 
 deviation from it. Estimated according to such a measure 
 of its signification, the idea or notion of justice is that of 
 the first, or rather the queen, of virtues ; for it governs and 
 employs all others. 
 
 And that truth is the very stay and strength of Justice is 
 plain from this — that those who are willing to do every duty 
 by their neighbours can never give effect to their virtues 
 under ignorance or delusion ; and those who are base 
 enough to seek the injury of their neighbours will scarce 
 avow their feelings or intentions, but endeavour to disguise 
 them by every species of falsehood. For, if all the 
 bonds by which society is held together would be burst 
 asunder, if men should altogether disregard the rules of 
 Justice, it is equally certain Unit such rules could not 
 be regarded without a true knowledge of the actions 
 and feelings to which those rules were to be applied. 
 And thus, also, as we abhor the oppressor, who in the inso- 
 lence of power openly tramples on the rights of others, so do 
 we despise and punish those who violate those rights through 
 fraud or falsehood. The honesty of the merchant is, that 
 he is true and just in all his dealings — the honor of man 
 with man is that he holds sacred his icord ; that " he 
 " sweareth to his neighbour and disappointeth him not, 
 " though it were to his own hindrance" — the honor of a 
 nation is the observance of national faith. Out of these 
 principles of truth arises Justice—and upon Justice is found- 
 ed as well the individual welfare of every man as member of 
 society, as the prosperity of a nation. We honor the man 
 of truth, because he scorns private and unjust advantage, 
 and because he is above even the sensation of fear. And 
 although in singular instances it often happens that fraud or 
 falsehood promotes a temporary advantage (which base men
 
 274 
 
 OF JUSTICE AS A VIRTUE. 
 
 are usually tempted to trust will fall to themselves) yet it 
 generally happens otherwise ; and it is absolutely certain 
 that, in the main, the real interests of the whole body of the 
 people, which ought to be the common cause, suffer. Experi- 
 ence, therefore, has assuredly shewn that national civilization 
 and prosperity advances in proportion to the love of truth 
 and justice. 
 
 But I must avoid wandering into discussion rather be- 
 longing to the moralist than to the expounder of the princi- 
 ples of human laws and rules of right, which are more pro- 
 perly the subjects of my present discourse, and to which 
 these observations are but introductory. 
 
 Of justice, therefore, in its highest and most general 
 meaning — or of that natural sense of what is due to each 
 man in his station, which inspires the disposition of a virtu- 
 ous man— or of that habit of mind which leads him volunta- 
 rily to render to each what is due— and how this sense and 
 habit of justice tends to human happiness— I am not about 
 to treat. Neither shall 1 examine into those principles of 
 justice which by common consent are, or ought to be, ac- 
 knowledged between independent nations ; who, having no 
 power to prescribe rules to each other, refer themselves only 
 to that natural and rational sense of right and wrong which 
 suggests voluntarily duties. But there are particular acts of 
 justice which are enforced, and particular acts of wrong 
 which are prohibited, by express regulations of human origin, 
 to which we give the name of laics. These laws settle and 
 declare what are rights and what are wrongs— and the ob- 
 servance of them depends, not on the opinions or inclinations 
 of those who live under them, but on the power of the magis- 
 trates appointed to enforce them. There are many things 
 which nature itself, or the revealed will of God, has taught 
 us should be done, or should be forborne, and whereby the 
 human race may best attain true happiness in life, which
 
 OF JUSTICE AS A VIRTUE. 275 
 
 things are, nevertheless, left to the dictation of our consci- 
 ences, or of our feeling, or of our religious faith. But other 
 matters for the hetter advancement of the peace and inter- 
 ests of mankind, and for the very preservation of the bonds 
 of society, have been necessarily made the subjects of im- 
 perative rules, and could not have been left to the erring 
 opinions or frail dispositions of mankind, fn the application 
 of these rules to human actions consists that particular 
 quality of justice which may be termed administrative 
 justice. 
 
 These rules, or laws, must be various in different nations, 
 according to the circumstances of each. But all are, or 
 ought to be, governed by certain common principles which are 
 the laics of laws. There are definite purposes and objects 
 of all laws having in view a true course of administrative 
 justice— and in ascertaining what these objects are, and 
 what are the essential qualities of just laws, as tending to 
 effect such objects, consists the science of Jurisprudence.
 
 SECTION II. 
 
 Of the nature and object of human laws for the 
 Administration of Justice. 
 
 It would be vain to expect that such a disquisition as I 
 propose to engage in can be made attractive to the general 
 reader, curious only for amusement. The doctrines and 
 propositions to be submitted involve many considerations, 
 and much reasoning ; and are not of a nature to be com- 
 prehended without some mental effort. The reader should 
 be warned, therefore, that, unless he brings to his assist- 
 ance a thoughtful reflection upon the passages he is about 
 to peruse, his attention wilj be unprofitably wasted. For 
 it is not to be denied that the science of jurisprudence 
 must be classed among those whose province it is to enrich 
 the understanding with fruitful and important truths, rather 
 than to entertain the imagination with pleasing fancies. 
 
 Since the happiness of man as a member of Civil Socie- 
 ty, or of an united community, is equally the final end 
 and object as well of all law as of all Government— and since 
 that happiness consists in the perfect enjoyment of private 
 rights of property and personal security from wrong — it 
 must be obvious that the proper function of all human laws 
 for the administration of justice must be to prescribe cer- 
 tain rules for the enjoyment of property, and certain rides 
 for the personal conduct, by the observance of which, those 
 private rights and personal security .are best attained. 
 Laws, therefore, can never be properly employed, as some 
 writers have incorrectly suggested, in matters which are 
 indifferent : for personal security and private rights can
 
 OBJECTS OF HUMAN LAWS. 277 
 
 never be matters of indifference. Much good writing has 
 been vainly expended in discussing whether all human laws 
 are binding on the conscience ; or whether every man may 
 not be at liberty to obey, or not, so?ne sort of laws, provid- 
 ed he is willing to undergo, or risk, the punishment affixed 
 to disobedience. But all just and expedient laws whatever 
 — whether existing by nature in our minds, or revealed to 
 us by God himself, or taking their origin purely from hu- 
 man device— are more or less binding on our consciences ; 
 because they all have more or less tendency to the same 
 object; namely, to promote hnman happiness. If once 
 assumed to be just and expedient, they must also be assum- 
 ed to be conducive to the end of administrative justice, which 
 is the happiness of man in civil society ; and, consequently, 
 they cannot fairly give rise to any question as to their 
 being indifferent, and of no moral obligation. Thus, if a law 
 shall prescribe that all boats used for particular purpose 
 shall be painted with letters iji a particular form, it would 
 be a vain distinction to say that this law springs merely out 
 of human opinion, and is not a law by nature. It is a law 
 expressly made for the purpose of better protecting the per- 
 sons or the property of those using the boats— and it is as 
 much a conscientious duly, though in an inferior degree, to 
 obey such a law, as another made for denouncing theft. 
 Neither is any individual member of the Community au- 
 thorized to judge and decide for himself whether any par- 
 ticular law is just and expedient, and therefore to obey it, 
 or not, according to the dictates of that private judgment. 
 For to exercise and act on such private judgment, is to 
 disobey the fundamental laws of Government and Society, 
 which require the surrender of a man's private will and 
 judgment to general rule and order — and which funda- 
 mental laws are by nature and necessity ; since society and 
 Government are necessary to human happiness. Every 
 man, therefore, is bound by conscience to submit his own 
 opinion to that of the Government under which he lives,
 
 278 OBJECTS OF HUMAN LAWS. 
 
 so long it is an acknowledged subsisting Government — 
 otherwise there could be neither right nor wrong, nor any 
 fixed notion of justice. But, as to when and how Govern- 
 ments themselves are to be amended or established, that is 
 not a subject of the present discourse. 
 
 Still, no human laws can bind us which contradict any 
 law of nature. This, however, is not because human laws, 
 merely as such, are not obligatory on our consciences— but 
 because it being impossible to obey both, we must observe 
 which is Superior, atad bend to that law which by contra- 
 dicting repudiates, and as the superior authority nullifies, 
 the other. And we can have no doubt that the law of na- 
 ture is the superior law— for the human intellect continually 
 errs, but nature never. If, therefore, any human law shall 
 prescribe the destruction of children by their own parents, 
 or a cruel burning of innocent and defenceless persons 
 by those on whose protection alone necessity has thrown 
 them, we may be sure that such a law is neither a 
 law of God nor of nature— for it is contradicted and repu- 
 diated by the natural feeling of mankind. The superior 
 law is that of nature, universal and eternal in our hearts, 
 and it forbids obedience to the human law which would 
 outrage the natural law.
 
 SECTION III. 
 
 Of the origin and nature of Property. 
 
 When we speak of private rights, and of property, and 
 
 of personal security, the protection of which is the object 
 of laws, it is fit that we should have a clear understand- 
 ing of what is meant by such terms. What is property? 
 How come men to any right to the exclusive enjoyment 
 of it ? and what is that perso?ial security to which all men 
 have a claim ? 
 
 Whether we consider mankind in that original state of 
 nature from which many savage nations have not even yet 
 emerged — or whether we consider man in the most advanc- 
 ed stage of civil society — we shall find, upon reflection, 
 that rights to property must depend on labour, which is 
 the true origin of all wealth. The savage who roams the 
 jungle in search of food has by his labour in capturing his 
 prey acquired a property in it, which cannot be violated by 
 another, who has not labored for it at all, without a viola- 
 tion also of our natural sense of justice. The savage set- 
 tling in his hut, and fencing in and cultivating some portion 
 of the unoccupied earth originally common to all, by that 
 labour creates the fruits of it, and gains a natural right to the 
 enjoyment of it. The manufacturer who produces some new 
 thing out of raw materials, or who exchanges his own pro- 
 ducts f»r other commodities (or for money which is the 
 current symbol and procurer of all commodities) comes by 
 the valuable thing he thus creates, or obtains in exchange, 
 through his personal labour, and thus establishes a claim 
 to it which none else can have. The merchant who buys
 
 280 
 
 ORIGIN AND NATURE OF PROPERTY. 
 
 for little, and sells for more, obtains the surplus through 
 his labour. The lawyer, the physician, the painter, the 
 musician, the dancer, although they produce nothing 
 tangible, yet, in so far as they either usefully contribute 
 by their exertions to the attainment of those commodities, 
 "which are obtained by labour, or to what is agreeable to the 
 senses or to the minds of mankind, they accomplish some- 
 thing which is desired, and which but for them would not 
 exist at all. The return made to them by commodities 
 or money, is that return which has been created by other's 
 labour, and is given in exchange for what they have created 
 by their own labour. And it can signify nothing whether 
 food, or raiment, or any other tangible commodity, be the 
 production, or whether the service of the lawyer, or 
 physician, be the contribution, for which the other com- 
 modity or money is given in exchange — for if food is 
 necessary, so is health, and if raiment be necessary, so is a 
 knowledge of the law and a" successful advocacy of claims. 
 It would be too much, indeed, to say that a particular 
 delicacy in food, or a peculiar finery of apparel, is more 
 rationally desirable, than the harmony of the musician, or 
 even than the gestures of the skilful dancer. Thus we 
 see that desirableness is the incentive and valuation of 
 labour, and labour, as it is the true origin, so is it the only 
 foundation for right or just claim to property. It is a 
 right which co-exists with the very nature of our being ; 
 for a maa must have as plain and just a right to that 
 which is solely and exclusively produced by his own 
 labour, as he can have to the use of his own faculties — 
 both rights being subject only to be abridged or modified 
 by such rules of Government and Society, without 
 which rules of some kind or other no rights whatever could 
 .subsist. 
 
 Hence we must also see how vain must be every preten- 
 sion to property, or in other words to those commodities
 
 ORIGIN AND NATURE OF PROPERTY. 
 
 281 
 
 created by labour, by those who have neither contributed 
 their own exertions or services towards the creation of it, 
 nor have derived it from those who have earned it by their's. 
 For no man can naturally, or according to that sense of 
 justice implanted by nature in every man's conscience, 
 claim to make his fellow-man labour for him without re- 
 quital If one man could demand the labour of another, with- 
 out any return or remuneration, he might with equal justice 
 demand the labour of one hundred or of one million. 
 Neither Society, nor Government, nor the well-being of 
 mankind under Government or in Society, require this. 
 Every man desires, and would endeavour, if nothing pre- 
 vented him, to get as much of the labour (on which proper- 
 ty depends j of other men as he can ; and there is no limit 
 to human desires. But it is the business of human laws 
 to prevent men from helping themselves at their own mere 
 will to what they desire, and to limit the right of every 
 man according to what he <mn himself do or supply in 
 exchange for his possessions, or to what has theretofore been 
 done or supplied by others in exchange for those posses- 
 sions. The King on his throne, as has been said before, 
 has his duties to perform in exchange for all he enjoys, in 
 the same manner as the labourer in the field must give his 
 services or his toil for the remuneration he receives.
 
 SECTION IV. 
 
 Of the transfer of and succession to Properly. 
 
 But property, and the right to it, having once originated 
 by labour, must be sustained, and kept in existence : it 
 must not be abandoned again to some chance occupier, or 
 to the strife of the strongest. Of the various possessions 
 which men even by their own labour gain they can them- 
 selves consume or enjoy but a small portion. What is to 
 be done with the surplus ? It may be suggested that it 
 cannot justly be allowed to be utterly wasted or destroyed 
 — and, therefore, what a man can neither consume or enjoy 
 ought to return again in common. But this is not conso- 
 nant to justice— for if property should so return in common, 
 no other man could gain a natural right to it through his 
 labour in producing that property ; and Society, which is 
 naturally necessary for man's happiness, would be broken 
 up, if such property become continually the subject of strife. 
 Neither is any thing wasted or destroyed, any more from 
 becoming a surplus beyond what the owner can himself 
 enjoy or consume. Somebody will soon or late be sure to 
 possess or consume it. It is to be inquired how the trans- 
 fer to others shall be made, so as best to keep Society well 
 together, and conduce to the general mass of human enjoy- 
 ment. And, upon such an enquiry, the consideration 
 immediately arises that nature itself has placed others in 
 necessary and immediate dependence on almost all men ; 
 and, in particular, he is impelled to provide for his own 
 family. Be&ides this, every man derives a pleasure in bes- 
 towing portions of his property, at least upon his children, 
 and usually upon his friends— and as this is a pleasure he
 
 TRANSFER OF AND SUCCESSION TO PROPERTY. 9g3 
 
 has earned by his labour, he has a natural right to the enjoy- 
 ment which is had in exchange for that which his labour 
 created. It is clear, therefore, that the right to property 
 carries with it the free right of disposal of it to others. 
 
 And this right is not put an end to even by a man's 
 death. In most civilized nations, a possessor of property 
 has the right by will to bequeath his property entirely at 
 his own discretion — in others, various modifications and 
 limits are imposed on this discretion. But, in all countries, 
 gome provision is made for sustaining a property in some 
 one, after the right of the last possessor has ceased by 
 death. The mode in which property after the possessor's 
 death shall descend, or be distributed, is indeed purely a 
 matter for human opinion. In the more barbarous and op- 
 pressed nations, we find human custom or express law has 
 given the property to the King or Chief — thus, not only de- 
 stroying the main incentives to industry, but unjustly in- 
 creasing the share of enjoyments falling to the Prince, and 
 also his power by the command of those means. In other 
 countries, the provision for children or relatives i3 enforced 
 to a greater or less extent. But, us society itself could not 
 subsist while property was left to be continually and univer- 
 sally the source of violent strife, the right to it, when once 
 property has been created, must necessarily be sustained by 
 providing a never-failing object for its transfer. 
 
 Such is property, and such the origin and nature of rights 
 to it— let us next examine what is meant by personal secu- 
 rity, and of rights to that.
 
 SECTION V. 
 
 Of the security of the Person. 
 
 This security of person can consist of nothing else than a 
 man's freedom from the infliction of death, or of bodily or 
 mental pain, by the acts of others. And this freedom from 
 wilful injury by another to life, or to the feelings, or to the 
 person, is what the inherent sense of every man informs 
 him he has a claim to in justice, or, in other words,. a right 
 to, unless by some determination of the rules of that society 
 or Government under which he lives (which society and Go- 
 vernment, with its rules of action, are also of natural neces- 
 sity to mankind) he shall have forfeited such right of ex- 
 emption from personal injury. And it is plain there could 
 not exist any natural right to property, or even to subsist- 
 ence, without the natural right of full security of person 
 against the unauthorized violence of others. For every man 
 must have a free liberty, as well from bodily pain as from 
 personal imprisonment or restraint, in order for the appli- 
 cation of his labour, on which property depends. So, also, 
 though in a minor degree, there must exist a natural right 
 to a man's deserved reputation and good character ; for, 
 not only is much misery of mind endured by the conscious- 
 ness of hatred excited against us, but all our faculties are 
 impaired, and our means and opportunities of industry frus- 
 trated, by the aversion of others which slander may have 
 raised.
 
 SECTION VI. 
 
 That the Lair a on which Administrative Justice is found- 
 ed should be certain and clear. 
 
 These rights, then, are the objects, and the sole objects, 
 of administrative justice — for if the rights of private proper- 
 ty, and those of personal security are fully protected, every 
 good that man can derive from civil Government and Laws 
 is attained. The business, therefore, of laws being the 
 protection of these rights, it remains to enquire what are 
 the essential qualities of those laws which best tend to ac- 
 complish that end. 
 
 It may be thought a propositkm too plain and self evident 
 to require discussion, that the laws for the administration of 
 justice should be certain and clear. And yet, plain as the 
 proposition is, the bulk of mankind are apt to misunder- 
 stand or misinterpret it. Among barbarous and unenlight- 
 ened nations there are very few rules of right, founded 
 on principle, by which the administration of justice is guid- 
 ed ; although it often happens that their bodies of law are 
 made up of a large accumulation of details, applicable to, 
 and probably suggested by particular cases and circumstan- 
 ces, but dependent on no general principles. Decisions or 
 rules of this nature, formed for the most part from the sug- 
 gestions of the natural sense of various-minded judges bear- 
 ing on individual instances, usually abound in inconsisten- 
 cies. As each case must have its own peculiar characteris- 
 tics, there is no good reason for excluding the authority of 
 the same natural sense in deciding new controversies, which 
 sense alone had dictated the rule of right on previous occa- 
 sions. Uncivilized nations, therefore, whose rules of law
 
 2SG LAWS SHOULD BE CERTAIN AND CLEAR. 
 
 are so imperfect, easily submit to a customary course of de- 
 viation from them : they can conceive no fairer mode, nor 
 any cheaper and more ready, of ascertaining rights than 
 the appeal to 'the upright judgment of a good man; and 
 their minds are slow to apprehend the advantage, or even 
 the possibility, of any system of (Wed rules which shall 
 comprise every quality of rights, and the most expedient 
 method of securing them. 
 
 But, further, it is very common to find, among the most 
 enlightened and best governed nations, those who under- 
 value the rules of law according to which justice is admi- 
 nistered , making continual appeals to reason and common 
 sense ; as though all forms and requisitions of such rules 
 should be set aside when the judge's natural uninstructed 
 sense could suggest a different view of the case, or a dif- 
 se of arriving at that view ; and as though all 
 such forms and requisitions,, were but so many whims and 
 :es invented for the purpose of shackling the efforts of 
 a free understanding. Such notions, however prevalent, 
 are in truth too shallow to deserve refutation. We may 
 assuredly declare that the universal experience of mankind 
 throughout all countries, independently of what our re- 
 flective reason would explain, has shewn that a people's 
 prosperity must entirely depend on the certainty and merit 
 of their rules for the administration of justice between 
 man and man. Those who are versed in such laws, who 
 watch and see their operation, who best can observe how 
 peace and security are preserved thereby, can shew forth the 
 grounds and reasonableness of the general rules by which 
 the} are guided. But such as prefer the impressions of 
 what they call plain and common sense (but by which they 
 can only mean their own understanding) are impatient of 
 the restraint of set rules, the meaning and application of 
 which they do not comprehend — they are averse to the 
 trouble which a studious examination of them would im-
 
 LAWS SHOULD BE CERTAIN AND CLEAR, 0$7 
 
 pose — and they are mortified at every exposure of the errors 
 which their unguided impressions betray them into. For 
 if ignorance begets a plain boldness of decision in an 
 arbitrary judge, it perplexes and renders helpless one who 
 is constrained to adjudicate according to law. 
 
 In no portion of the civilized world are the rules of 
 justice so uncertain, so obscure, and so contradictory as 
 in India — and if justice is not worst administered there, 
 it is owing rather to the integrity of its functionaries 
 than to any merit of Indian law. It has been said by an 
 Indian Judge of great experience and learning, that " there 
 " is scarce a question of Hindoo law which may not be 
 " affirmed, and also denied, upon the authority of some 
 " book." It may be well therefore to pass in review some 
 of the more obvious mischiefs arising from the want of 
 certain and clear rules for the administration of justice. 
 
 If judgments shall be given According to the individual's 
 sense of what is just — for want of any plain and sure 
 guide in the admitted law — how could any man distinguish 
 between what was the Judge's real sense of what was just, and 
 what was his mere caprice and feeling ? If such indi- 
 vidual sense, or caprice, or personal feeling, was the sole 
 origin of a judgment, who could say, that any judgment 
 was right, or was wrong ? For there would be no guide. 
 Every man might say that his own sense was as good as 
 that of another— every man might ascribe to his sense of 
 right, the judgments which, in truth, were dictated by his 
 evil passions ; and there could be no check against corrup- 
 tion. No man could feel, nor could he in reality be, safe 
 in his person or his property. Let any one inquire " hat 
 powers the Hindoo king, or even the Hindoo Brahmin 
 possesses, over the persons of others, and he would seek 
 to define them in vain. The power of the king is absolute 
 and uncontrollable— he is a powerful divinity— but he is
 
 2S8 
 
 LAWS SHOULD BE CERTAIN AND CLEAtt. 
 
 directed to act on advice, and generally through the minis- 
 tration, of the Brahmins—" a divinity in the human form" 
 his first and main duty is " to inflict punishment according 
 "to the Shasters." How then do the Shasters direct 
 punishment to be inflicted— hy what rules and for what 
 specific criminal acts ? And how does the Brahmin con- 
 tribute his advice, and execute his office? " If a blow, 
 " attended with much pain, be given to human creatures 
 " or cattle, the king shall inflict on the striker a punish- 
 " merit as heavy as the presumed suffering ! "A Gold- 
 " smith who commits fraud the king shall order to be cut 
 "piece-meal with razors." " Robbers who break a wall, 
 " or steal in the night, the king shall cut off their hands, 
 " and transfix them with a stake." " If a man steal a horse 
 " of small account , the magistrate shall cut off one hand 
 " and one foot — if any small animal, exclusive of a cat or 
 " weasel, the magistrate shall cut off half his foot" &c. &c. 
 " A Brahmin is a powerful divinity, whether learned or 
 " ignorant." " He need not complain to the king of any 
 " injury — even by his oivn poicer he may chastise those 
 " who injure him." '• For ill language to a Brahmin 
 " the Sooder must have a red hot iron style, ten fingers 
 " long, thrust into his mouth — for offering a Brahmin 
 " instruction hot oil must be poured into his mouth and 
 " ears — for sitting on a Brahmin's carpet he shall be liable 
 " to have his buttock cut off." " But a Brahmin himself 
 " shall neither lose his property, nor be hurt in his person, 
 " although he commits all possible crimes." " Whatever 
 <: orders the Brahmins shall issue conformably with the 
 " Shasters, the magistrate shall execute" (Vide Laws of 
 Menu). Let any one examine the institutes of Menu to 
 ascertain when and how a Hindoo son becomes incapable 
 of inheritance. He will read of " those distinguished by 
 " science and good conduct being allowed to take a greater 
 " share"— but, among those utterly excluded from any in- 
 heritance at all, are enumerated " lame, blind, deaf, afflict-
 
 LAWS SHOULD BE CERTAIN AND CLEAR. 
 
 289 
 
 " ed with any incurable disease (as, amongst others, dysen. 
 ie tery) — those who have no principle of religion — those 
 " who have lost the use of a limb." It is plain that such 
 general indiscriminate language as this — to say nothing of 
 the palpable injustice of such rules— must leave the appli- 
 cation of such laws open to mere arbitrary discretion. 
 "What a fertile source of dispute is the capacity, or not of 
 a Hindoo to bequeath ! What are the rights of members 
 of undivided, and of divided families ? 
 
 Thus a vague and obscure text — together with the 
 peculiarity and variety of irrational customs in different castes 
 — confounds the most vital interests in uncertainty — and 
 arbitrary constructions must supersede all regularity in 
 judgments. In such a state of things no certainty of legal 
 advice is attainable — and where no rights can certainly be 
 known, there can be no end of litigation. Industry, the, 
 fountain of wealth, becomes dried-. up in the barrenness of 
 insecurity of possessions. The people who do not see, or 
 who do not heed, such evils as these must be content to 
 live in poverty and dependence — as herds obedient to the 
 voice of their master. What right in another to respect, 
 and what right of his own to claim, no man can surely 
 know — what act under what penalty to refrain from, what 
 duty to undertake, no man can learn. " If the trumpet 
 " give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself for 
 " the battle." Those laws, therefore, are best which leave 
 least within the breast of the judge. And a judge, to be 
 truly such, is not one who is merely sagacious in discernment., 
 and imbued with a sincere and upright sense of the prin- 
 ciples of justice ; but one who is learned in definite laws* 
 For he is the best judge who leaves the least to himself.
 
 SECTION VII. 
 
 In ichat maimer Laws should specify and define rights. 
 
 Laws, then, which are to be the sure test of rights, and 
 to be the certain guide to the magistrate in the dispensation 
 of justice, instead of his own wayward and arbitrary will, 
 ought to ascertain and specify those rights : they ought to 
 set forth how they are acquired, and they ought to point 
 out under what circumstances and in what manner they 
 finally cease. 
 
 As to what are the rights of personal security, they are 
 few and plain, and have been sufficiently enumerated per- 
 haps already. But the rig'hts of property are so various ; 
 and subject to so many qualifications — they become so in- 
 finite in number and complicated in quality, in proportion 
 as the industry of mankind increases and improves the 
 sources of enjoyment — that in the highest civilized nations 
 the currency of legislation can scarcely keep up with them. 
 An exact definition of rights becomes continually more 
 difficult, and a clear and ready knowledge of them requires 
 long and laborious study. 
 
 Looking in the present inquiry no farther than to the 
 principles of administrative justice, and to what should 
 be the main and universal characteristics of human laws 
 directed to enforce it, we must be content with laying 
 down and establishing general positions, without follow- 
 ing them up in detail. We may recognize, upon re- 
 flection, this position— that all rights of property must 
 consist in the power conceded by the community of 
 using or employing things or persons in particular modes,
 
 LAWS SHOULD SPECIFY AND DEFINE RIGHTS. 
 
 291 
 
 so as to derive a gratification from such use or employment. 
 A perfect definition of rights, therefore, should comprise and 
 specify all the various modes of using or enjoying things, 
 and of employing persons. Thus, a piece of land, or a house, 
 may be used in a limited or in an unlimited manner — for a 
 limited or an unlimited time — upon certain conditions 
 or without any conditions. And so also of other and 
 movable articles of property, a man may have the abso- 
 lute uncontrolled power of using and of disposing of 
 it, or various limitations and conditions may be annex- 
 ed. And, again, the services of persons may belong to 
 others, either for the purpose of creating or increasing tan- 
 gible property, or of contributing to the gratification of the 
 senses or intellectual faculties. Accordingly, our enumeration 
 of powers over things, and over persons, for these Gbjects 
 should not only specify the modes of using and employing 
 them, but also the extent of those powers, or in other words 
 rights. The definition of these rights will further ascertain 
 the beginnings or grounds of them — such as by labour, or 
 by contact, bequest, succession, or the declared will of the 
 legislature. And, lastly, it will proceed to specify those facts 
 and circumstances which put an end to such rights. Such, 
 cessation of right, independently of those circumstances 
 above noticed as expressly transferring such previous rights 
 to others, may arise, not only of necessity, as by death, but 
 by forfeiture, or by some inexpediency in the further exist- 
 ence of such rights — as for instance rights over slaves — or 
 by abandonment, or by dedication to public objects, and in 
 various other ways. Laws must be proportionally defective 
 as they fail to enumerate and define such various rights of 
 property —for it must be vain to attempt the protection of 
 rights, the existence and nature of which are altogether 
 unknown.
 
 SECTION VIII. 
 
 Of the Civil Code— for the restoration of rights, a?id the 
 
 redress of Injuries. 
 
 If the various rights of personal security, and of property 
 with all its subdivisions and qualifications, have been speci- 
 fied and ascertained, it becomes the next essential charac- 
 teristic by which a good system of laws is to be estimated, 
 that it provides efficient means for securing every member of 
 the social community against the violation of those rights. 
 This can be done by two courses only : 1st, By supplying a 
 restoration of such rights, or adequate redress when resto- 
 ration is impossible ; and, secondly, by the infliction of so 
 much pain and suffering on the party who shall invade them 
 as may suffice generally to deter the bulk of mankind from 
 such wrong. 
 
 Hence arises a two fold division of laws for the adminis- 
 tration of justice. 1st, That body of laws which expounds 
 the nature of rights, and a course of procedure for recompens- 
 ing the violation of those rights — 2ndly, That class of laws 
 which define what acts shall be offences or crime?, and 
 which laws also prescribe a course of procedure with the 
 view of punishment. There is no apt term recognized in 
 the English language to distinguish the first class of laws ; 
 but it is generally termed the Civil Code, and we may desig- 
 nate it as the Code of rights ; the second division is with 
 more meaning termed the Criminal, or penal Code— or the 
 Code of crime. 
 
 This two fold division of laws is founded on reason and 
 principle ; as will appear if we pass in review the distin-
 
 OF THE CIVIL CODE. 293 
 
 guishing qualities of each body of laws. The code of rights 
 having in view the definition of the rights of property in 
 persons or things— that is, the modes by which services de- 
 rivable from persons or things shall be enjoyed — how the 
 rights shall be acquired, and how they shall cease — will ne- 
 cessarily be various in different countries. They will be 
 altogether regulated according to the situation, the climate, 
 the quality of the Government and other peculiar extrinsic 
 circumstances of those different countries. There is 
 no standard general rule of right for each such law, appli- 
 cable under all circumstances. Whether a law shall declare 
 that all sons shall inherit equally, or whether it shall declare 
 that they shall succeed in certain proportions — whether a 
 law shall allow the taking of interest, at 5, or at 12 per 
 cent, or at any indefinite amount — may be questions of mere 
 social policy ; and either law may be best, according to the 
 condition of the people. Neither is there any natural 
 and universally acknowledged guilt in deviations from the 
 greater portion of such laws, except in so fur that all ex- 
 press laws under settled Governments ought for that rea- 
 son, to carry with them our conscientious obedience. Such 
 laws must also necessarily vary according to the national 
 wealth, and the stage of advancement in civilization of the 
 people— and they also necessarily change in the same coun- 
 tries according to the progress of wealth and advancement. 
 In proportion to such increase must be the number of cases 
 which combine new and unprecedented circumstances, 
 unforeseen and unprovided for in express detail, and which 
 either must be shewn to class under the general rule and 
 reason of laws already existing, or else become the subject 
 of new laws, or of original decision according to some na- 
 tural sense of justice. Contests arising out of such new 
 cases of doubtful rights imply no guilt — each contending 
 party may assert his pretensions in good faith — they may 
 be set up through mere misapprehensions of facts, or of law, 
 and such misapprehension may be unavoidable. More-
 
 294 0F THE CIVIL CODE. 
 
 over there are some omissions of duty, and some devi- 
 ations from known rules of law, which, however wilful 
 or unjustifiable, yet, being confined in their effects to 
 the interests "of one or a few individuals, may be suffici- 
 ently restrained or rectified by a course of law which may 
 nullify such injurious effects, or afford a full restoration of 
 the rights invaded. The distinguishing characteristics of 
 the Civil Code, or code of rights, therefore, are that it 
 merely ascertains rights, and supplies remedies for the in- 
 vasion of 'hem, through restoration or redress to the injur- 
 ed party. As this object can only be accomplished by means 
 of Properly, to property alone are its operations confined 
 when called into action. Its aim is not the infliction of any 
 pain or suffering ; except, indeed, such become the means, 
 and the only means, by which its real aim that of restora- 
 tion or redress can be attained. Its method of procedure 
 for the investigation of facts, the declaration of the law, 
 the award of recompence, and the enforcement of its judg- 
 ments, admits of many differences, according to the nature 
 of the right to be ascertained, and that of the injury to be 
 redressed : but all these differences are guided and govern- 
 ed by the characteristic objects in view, namely, redress 
 through the regulation or transfer of property. As the 
 questions which arise in civil litigation are very various, and 
 often difficult, its course of procedure for the ascertain- 
 ment of facts, for the exposition of the law, and for the 
 enforcing of the judgments is the more cautious and com- 
 plicated. Since no guilt is assumed on either side, or at 
 least beyond the power of redress, its judicial process is equal 
 between the opposing parties ; and as property alone is the 
 subject matter contested for, the immunity and liberty of 
 the person is the more respected.
 
 SECTION IX. 
 
 Of the Criminal Code for the punishment of Injuries. 
 
 The code of crime, or criminal code, although it has the 
 same general view as th 3 code of rights— namely, the 
 protection of property and personal security — has reference 
 to an entirely distinct quality of wrongs against property 
 and person, and prescribes a different course for the pre- 
 vention of such wrongs. It selects a series of acts which 
 contradict the rules of justice hetween man and man, and 
 the well-being of the social community, which acts it de- 
 nounces, not as deviations to be rectified, but as offences, 
 or crimes, to be retributed by public hatred and personal 
 suffering. Acts of this quality are, or ought to be, such 
 only as our natural conscience suggests to us as unjust. 
 Laws against crime, therefore, are very similar in all coun- 
 tries—all depending on one common principle, and guided by 
 the common sentiments of human nature. The guilt of theft, 
 or murder, depends not on any questions of social policy. 
 Nature itself has stamped the odious and injurious charac- 
 teristics of such acts. Little controversy can arise respect- 
 in"- the quality of direct, lawless, criminal invasions of 
 ri"hls, compared with the infinite diversity of questions 
 arising out of the contests and doubts attending the acqui- 
 sition and enjoyment of property. Long and black as the 
 catalogue of human delinquencies may be, they are but few 
 ■which come within the scope of the Criminal Code. Crimes 
 are distinguished as those acts which effect injury through 
 fraud, or through terror, or through actual violence — which 
 thereby create a general apprehension of insecurity — and 
 which inflict wrongs for the most part beyond the means of 
 redress : and to such acts may be added some which are
 
 £96 0F TIIE CRIMINAL CODE. 
 
 criminal only because the perpetration of them excites a na- 
 tural hatred and abhorrence. The remedy aimed at is, not 
 the rectification of that which is wrong, or merely the re- 
 compence to be made to the individual injured — which is 
 generally impossible, and always inadequate to the total 
 amount of mischief— but the future protection of the com- 
 munity generally, through the personal punishment of the 
 Criminal. 
 
 Such being the subject-matter, and such the immediate 
 object of the Criminal Code, as distinguishable from those 
 of the Code of Rights, we may expect that its course of 
 procedure will also exhibit some corresponding differences. 
 As every course of legal procedure, whether as it regards 
 civil rights or criminal acts, is similarly concerned in the 
 investigation of facts, the exposition of the law, and the 
 enforcing of judgments pronounced — some writers have 
 been induced to designate this as a third and separate 
 branch of jurisprudence, under the term of The Code of 
 Procedure, and such a threefold division may not be an 
 inconvenient or an incorrect method of classifying the whole 
 subject-matter of human laws. But, as each of the former 
 divisions of jurisprudence, the Code of rights and the 
 Code of Crime, effect their final objects in the protection 
 of property and personal security through different modes 
 of judicial proceeding, and different resulting operations, 
 those distinctions ought not to be lost sight of, so as to con- 
 found the judicial procedure for the investigation and pro- 
 tection of civil rights with that for the investigation and 
 punishment of crimes, 
 
 "When a crime has been committed, it is Society that 
 suffers, and not merely an individual— it is the further se- 
 curity of society that is to be protected by the punishment 
 of the criminal, and not the party injured to be personally 
 redressed. There is no personal interest at stake, there-
 
 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE. 297 
 
 fore, which may bias any individual in putting the law into 
 force. Every man in pursuit of justice against the offender 
 has, or ought, and is supposed to have, a 'public object 
 only in view — and every member of society is more or less 
 concerned in lending his aid. As a sense of public duty 
 is to be assumed as actuating the party accusing, and some 
 presumption of guilt is fixed upon a party actually charged 
 by any testimony of facts, the accuser and the culprit do 
 not submit the case for judicial enquiry and judgment with 
 equal relative rights and equal relative responsibilities, in 
 the same manner as litigants do when contesting civil rights, 
 each with a view to his own private interest. The quality 
 of the acts charged, the nature of the personal suffering to 
 be undergone by the guilty party, and the presumption of 
 the existing guilt as soon as a specific accusation is credibly 
 made, dictate also a stricter course for ensuring the personal 
 appearance to answer the charge made, in cases where the 
 accused can by his person only, and not by his "property, 
 atone for his crime. And, lastly, in proportion to the se- 
 vere, and sometimes irremediable, consequences of punish- 
 ment on the guilty, ought to be the various safeguards sup- 
 plied for the ascertainment of truth and the defence of the 
 innocent.
 
 SECTION X. 
 
 That revc?ige is not a j ust principle or object of laws against 
 
 Crime. 
 
 But, before I proceed further to comment on that branch 
 of administrative justice which respects the objects and 
 method of Judicial Procedure, some further considera- 
 tion appears due to the governing principles of crime and 
 punishment. 
 
 The appetite for revenge is a passion so naturally allied 
 to the sense of injury, that it is difficult for the 
 ordinary and unreflecting masses of mankind to con- 
 ceive that the gratification of it is not as conformable to 
 morality as it is urgent upon our feelings. Our anger 
 is not voluntary : its mastery over the reason is proverbial : 
 for, although the occasions are rare (and usually arising out 
 of habitual indulgence) when sudden wrath utterly over- 
 throws all the powers of the mind, yet it is altogether im- 
 possible to prevent such excitement having in some degree 
 its bias on our reason, and too often on our actions. Even 
 our resentment — which we may distinguish as thoughtful 
 anger — will, in spite of self-control, still rankle in our breasts, 
 so long as the author of our wrongs triumphs in careless im- 
 punity. Nay, it is a feeling that has so much of dignity and 
 manliness in it, as to carry a sort of commendation 
 among the bulk of mankind. 
 
 There is no doubt, therefore, that the propensity to re- 
 venge has been implanted in our bosoms by the God of na- 
 ture for wise — and, if wise, we must say for beneficent— pur- 
 poses. It is, in truth, that natural impulse by which man-
 
 REVENGE NOT AN OBJECT OF CRIMINAL LAV. 299 
 
 kind are led to protect themselves against injury through 
 the infliction of-suffering upon the wrongdoer, and where- 
 by the softer feelings of sympathy with our fellow-creatures 
 is, with a view to the general well-being of all, stifled for 
 the time. For revenge is a sort of wild justice —and its 
 growth in the mind is in proportion to its want of rational 
 culture. The nearer that a savage people approach a state 
 of nature, the more they are governed by their passions. 
 By vengeance they not only gratify a raging appetite, but 
 they also preserve their social existence, which could no 
 longer continue if universal wrong could not by some 
 such course be prevented. And even afterwards, as ci- 
 vilization, and government, and law gradually gather and 
 keep together a people, converting wandering tribes into 
 settled nations, we find that they are slow to perceive the 
 true object of human punishments, and slow to resign the 
 gratifications of revenge. In proportion to the civiliza- 
 tion of a people, does vengeance»cease to be applauded; and, 
 afterwards, to be tolerated — and thus we may reckon 
 among the tests of the ignorance and barbarity of a nation 
 the cruelty of its punishments. 
 
 Allowing, then, that we may regard the desire of revenge 
 as a natural feeling, which would not exist at all but for 
 purposes consonant to the well-being of mankind, we must 
 regard it also as an impulse, which, like those of all other 
 passions, will drive us into misery and evil, unless guided 
 by our reason — and, in that guidance, we must entirely re- 
 spect the end which the creator of man must have intended. 
 That end was not any gratification to be derived from hu- 
 man suffering. So far from it, this gratification is but of 
 short duration, and generally gives rise to compunction or 
 sorrow, rather than to any lasting complacency. And this 
 happens because men are usually inordinate in their desire 
 of what tends to their own gratification— and there is always
 
 300 REVENGE NOT AN OBJECT OF CRIMINAL LAW, 
 
 something repulsive in the reflecting contemplation of the 
 suffering of another which has produced no benefit to any 
 body. It would, indeed, be hard to say what measure of 
 vengeance would be sufficient to satiate resentment in any 
 given case ; and it would be equally difficult to say to what 
 degree the desire of revenge may be satiated without caus- 
 ing some resulting regret. Such a gratification cannot, there- 
 fore, be good for its own sake, or as a source of virtuous 
 happiness. The impulse which excites us towards it must 
 have another aim and object — the gratification is but as the 
 means to an end, and not the end itself. On the contrary, our 
 more reflecting sentiments teach us sympathy, fellow-feeling, 
 and the forgiveness of injuries. 
 
 But, if neither reason, nor a true sense of morality, will 
 sanction the gratification of revenge — still less is it the pro- 
 vince of human laws, which in their best sense are the per- 
 fection of reason, to administer to such an appetite. The 
 office of the law is either to weed out altogether that wild 
 justice which derives its growth from the passions of savage 
 nature, or else to change its rudeness through culture. It 
 looks only to the happiness of man in society, and not to the 
 gratifications of his solitary feelings, still less of his unsocial 
 appetites. Bodily suffering it contemplates as a pure 
 evil in itself ; it regards the infliction of it as justifi- 
 able only in preventing worse evils. If the infliction 
 of personal punishment becomes necessary for the mainte- 
 nance of personal security and of private property, which are 
 the resulting objects of all human laws, the extent of such 
 punishment is limited by the bounds of such necessity. Every 
 amount of pain administered beyond the existing necessity 
 for such, the only just, objects of human laws is a mere 
 sacrifice to malignity — a creation of evil to answer no useful 
 purpose — an unmixed mischief. This is a maxim which 
 ought never to be lost sight of by the wise legislator or the 
 enlightened citizen. Cruel laws will not be carried into
 
 REVENUE NOT AN OBJECT OF CRIMINAL LAW. ^Q\ 
 
 effect by a humane and intelligent people— and, therefore, 
 become nugalory, and for that reason an encouragement to 
 crime. But if inordinate and vindictive punishments are 
 resolutely inflicted, it either betokens discontent among the 
 people, or serves to brutalize their dispositions, and retard 
 their social prosperity.
 
 SECTION XI. 
 
 The legitimate object of human Punishment. 
 
 The only legitimate way in which punishment can 
 operate in protection of rights, is by the terror of example. 
 It, accordingly, becomes the object of a just Government to 
 ascertain, as far as its limited capacity will allow, the amount 
 of punishment which will suffice to inspire so mu.ch terror 
 as may induce a voluntary abstinence from crime. This 
 amount of punishment can never, in truth, be absolutely 
 ascertained — for there is no severity of it, not even certain 
 death by extreme tortures, which will assuredly deter all 
 mankind from the commission of some sort of crime. His- 
 tory records many instances of the perpetration of crime, 
 through vengeance, or excited passions, which the malefactor 
 has dared, in spite of the expectation of the manifest and 
 immediate retribution of a cruel death. And it is also the 
 subject of continual experience, that men will sometimes 
 purchase a temporary gratification at the certain cost of 
 greater suffering than they can inflict, or than such gratifica- 
 tion can, even in their own opinion, compensate for. But, 
 still, in all ordinary cases the promptness and certainty of 
 any the smallest amount of suffering or privation to be un- 
 dergone beyond the gratification or gain acquired by the 
 commission of the crime, would be sufficient to quell all 
 temptation to it. It is plain that there could scarcely be a 
 theft, if the plunderer should be sure that he would imme- 
 diately have to surrender his booty, and' something more. 
 And so it may be said of most other crimes, when an imme- 
 diate retribution should be made to surpass in the slightest 
 degree the gratification. A greater amount of punishment
 
 LEGITIMATE OBJECT OF HUMAN PUNISHMENT. 3Q3 
 
 becomes necessary only for these two reasons — First, 
 because it is impossible to make the retribution either certain 
 or immediate ; Secondly,, because there are human passions 
 and appetites so strong, as that in some cases} neither ihe 
 certainty nor the immediateness of a much larger share of 
 suffering than that inflicted, or than may overbalance 
 the temporary gratification of such passions, will deter men 
 from rushing on the guilt. The effect of mere delay and 
 uncertainty of any retributive evil in deadening its influ- 
 ence on the apprehension is as remarkable as it is obvious 
 to our reflection. Thus, the uncertain period, and the fan- 
 cied remoteness, of death itself, the most appalling and the 
 most assured of all evils, renders us all but indifferent to its 
 terrors. And it must be quite unnecessary to point out how 
 commonly the human appetites impel us unscrupulously to 
 acts, which our own judgment clearly shews to be, eventually, 
 productive of a real disadvantage. 
 
 It follows from these considerations that, in the endeavour 
 (for it can be no more) of a Government to affix a sufficient 
 amount of punishment to deter from the commission of crime, 
 it must necessarily adopt, so far as it is possible, a scale of 
 retribution very considerably beyond that of the injury inflict- 
 ed, or the gratification enjoyed from the perpetration of the 
 crime. It must endeavour to compensate for the influence of 
 the delay and uncertainty of the retribution in deadening 
 our sense of apprehension— and it must strive to counteract 
 by severity the bias of the passions over the judgment and 
 conscience of mankind. At the same time it is to be ob- 
 served that, in proportion to the promptness and cer- 
 tainty of punishment', should be its leniency— and that, 
 since all unnecessary pain is an evil, a wise legislature will 
 aim at perfection in the rules for preventing and detecting 
 crime, and ensuring penal retribution with a view to increas- 
 ing the dread of criminality, rather than trust to any vindic- 
 tive cruelty in punishment. For severity can never be just-
 
 304 LEGITIMATE OBJECT OF HUMAN PUNISHMENT. 
 
 ly or effectually made a substitute for that certainty and re- 
 gularity which may be attainable by a good Criminal Code 
 well administered. Either humanity shudders and revolts 
 at the disproportioned punishment— or, else, all just feeling 
 must be uprooted from the heart through ignorance and 
 barbarity. For the same reason simple death ought to be 
 the utmost punishment inflicted for the greatest crime. 
 Because, although death through accumulated tortures may 
 be the more dreadful to endure, yet the increased terror at 
 crime thereby occasioned will by no means compensate for 
 the outrage on all proper feelings of humanity, or for the 
 evil effects of the insensibility of a people to such horrors. 
 Moreover, it is reasonably doubted whether criminals, who 
 disregard the penalty of death, will be induced to refrain 
 through the apprehension of additional tortures. 
 
 Of the various prevalent modes of punishment it would 
 be an useless labour to rehearse a list, unless with a view to 
 discuss the appropriate application, or otherwise, of each, or 
 else with a view to gather some general rules in the adapta- 
 tion of punishments to crimes. Both the one and the other 
 of such objects would lead me far beyond the scope of this 
 discourse— and, indeed, so much controversy has been rais- 
 ed, and still exists, on these points that I could advance but 
 few positions as indisputably settled on sound argument. 
 It is clear that the nature of the punishment ought not al- 
 ways to depend on the quality of the crime, but must some- 
 limes be regulated by the quality of the criminal. Of 
 punishments, some are purely corporal, others operate chiefly 
 on the mind and feelings. The lash, or heavy labour, 
 may be all that is felt in the infliction of such suffering on 
 the low-born, ignorant, and hardened pauper —exposure to 
 public scorn, privation of all present property, banishment 
 from his country, may be penalties of which he could scarce 
 be sensible. By the man of birth, or respectable station in 
 life, on the contrary, personal pain may be in itself compara-
 
 LEGITIMATE OBJECT OF HUMAN PUNISHMENT. 3O5 
 
 lively despised ; but the disgrace and infamy which may attend 
 the infliction of it may he more intolerable than death itself: 
 and, to him, exposure merely, deprivation of rank or fortune, 
 or transportation from his home, must necessarily be a pun- 
 ishment of the severest nature. Again, the assault or the 
 slander committed by the low-bred common labourer 
 against his equal neighbour may be of little account — that 
 of the rich man, or the nobleman, against his equal may 
 testify the most, injurious outrage or villany. These con- 
 trasts, according to persons and circumstances, might be 
 copiously exemplified, and they serve to shew that 
 there can be but few general rules in the adoption or rejec- 
 tion of particular modes of punishment. One, however, 
 appears to gain ground in the consideration of most civilized 
 nations — which is, the avoiding, as far as possible, the infliction 
 of corporal pain, and the resort to such punishments as may 
 rather enforce and embitter reflection. And this princi- 
 ple in punishment seems well founded, inasmuch as while 
 the penalty which the criminal is made to endure may 
 be, in itself, a sufficient warning and example, it tends 
 at the same time to his reformation, and thereby to 
 relieve him, eventually, in some degree from that load of pub- 
 lic hatred and personal disgrace which aggravates his suffer- 
 ing beyond what is due, and renders him an useless in- 
 cumbrance on society.
 
 SECTION .XII. 
 
 Of the Code of Judicial Procedure, and its nature and 
 
 objects. 
 
 I have thus endeavoured to point out what are Ihe rights 
 which are the ohjects of administrative justice— to shew 
 that they should be ascertained by clear laws — and to ex- 
 plain the quality and the principles of that body of laws 
 directed to expounding rights and affording redress for the 
 invasion of them, and of that body of laws directed to the 
 punishment of a criminal violation of rights. It now be- 
 comes expedient to add a few further observations on the 
 quality and principles of that branch of jurisprudence which 
 is concerned in setting forth 1 the method of judicial proce- 
 dure, which I have considered as forming part of each of the 
 above twofold division of human laws, but which has 
 been sometimes treated of separately as a third division^ 
 under the term of Me code of procedure. 
 
 The ohjects of judicial procedure are — the investigation of 
 alleged facts or charges — the exposition of the rules of law 
 as applicable to ascertained facts — and the enforcement of 
 the judgments pronounced with a view to redress or punish- 
 ment. For these purposes regular Courts of law should 
 be established, with distinct and well ascertained powers 
 and jurisdiction ; and the judges, who preside over them 
 for the administration of justice according to the settled 
 rules of law, should be such ashy a long course of education 
 and experience in the laws of the land have proved their 
 competency to such duty. Their decisions, should be open- 
 ly and publicly pronounced ; and so long as they stand, and 
 subject to such correction and rectification by superior au-
 
 OF THE CODE OP JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 3Q7 
 
 thority as by express law may have been provided, they 
 should be uncontrollable. That their decisions may be given 
 according to the dictates of their true knowledge and of 
 their conscience, judges of every quality should be made, 
 as far as possible, independent of all bias from interest and 
 from fear, in respect of any consequences of their judgments. 
 But by this it is not to be understood that judges should 
 be exempt, from all superior control or personal responsibili- 
 ty. The ignorant judge should be displaced, the unjust judge 
 should be punished. But their independence should be that 
 of the mere discretionary power of any party to favor or to 
 injure them With reason, therefore, does a just system of 
 law and of Government throw around all judicial functiona- 
 ries so large a share of protection in the performance of their 
 duties, that nothing short of deliberate and full proofs, 
 before some well constituted tribunal of enquiry, of guilt or 
 incompetency in such performance should affect their inter- 
 ests, their reputations, or their security. And thus much it may 
 be sufficient to observe upon the principles which should 
 prevail in the establishment of Courts, and the quality of the 
 judicial authority— for it is not intended here to discuss the 
 expedient constitutions of various Courts, their relative ex- 
 tent of jurisdiction, or the respective qualifications of their 
 presiding magistrates or ministerial officers. 
 
 But the objects of judicial procedure are very far from 
 being attained by the mere establishment of regular Courts, 
 and the appointment of able, learned, and conscientious 
 judges to administer justice therein according to law. That, 
 they may be enabled to ascertain facts— to apply the rules of 
 law to such stale of facts — and efficiently to carry their judg- 
 ments into execution — they require to be guided by certain 
 settled forms and' rules, such as long experience, the con- 
 tinued exercise of sagacity, and a consideration of the cir- 
 cumstances of the people of the country, have suggested 
 as most conducive to the accomplishment of these ends.
 
 308 0F TIIE CODE OF JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 
 
 For it is to be considered that, with a view to the just as- 
 certainment of facts, or the subject-matter .in controversy, 
 and the exposition of the law applicable to the case, it is 
 necessary, first, to provide that the charge or complaint made, 
 as well as the point or charge denied, should be precise, spe- 
 cific, and clear; so that the judge may perceive exactly 
 and plainly what is the matter of fact to be investigated, or 
 ivhat the matter of disputed law to be adjudicated upon : 
 and, secondly, it is requisite to provide for the due admis- 
 sion of proper proofs. So, also, as regards the efficient exe- 
 cution of judgments, when pronounced, all evasions must 
 be prevented, and all excesses provided against. All these 
 purposes require some regulated course of stating facts —some 
 regulated means of compelling disputant parties to answer 
 or admit each other's statements — some method by which in- 
 quiry into disputed facts should be prosecuted — some process 
 by which the testimony of witnesses or of documents should 
 be adducible — some rules as 6 to what testimony or evidence 
 is relevant or receivable, and for sifting and examining the 
 quality of that which is to be received — some order in the 
 delivery, of judgments, and also in obtaining a rectification 
 of such as may have been erroneous— and, finally, certain 
 specific modes of enforcing on the person, or upon the pro- 
 perty, of delinquent parties, the work of restoration, recom- 
 pense, or punishment. 
 
 A slight reflection on this complicated subject will teach 
 us that to frame a body of rules best calculated to effect 
 these objects in the practical administration of justice among 
 a populous and civilized nation, must be a task of great labour, 
 of much sagacity, and also of experienced knowledge. Such 
 a system of judicial procedure has rather to be built up in 
 the progress of ages, than to be devised at once from the 
 mere force of invention. If parties complaining of wrongs, or 
 demanding rights, or imputing crimes, are not to be left en- 
 tirely to their own discretion as regards the modes of bringing
 
 OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 3Q9 
 
 forward thoir claims or charges — lest the ignorant or the 
 weak-minded should inadequately represent the subject- 
 matter of inquiry — lest the statements made should be ob- 
 scure, or comprise long and vain details -lest the opposing 
 party may not be able to perceive distinctly what he has to 
 answer— lest a full and fair opportunity be not given him to 
 make his answer— then is it requisite that some forms and 
 methods should be devised, by compelling an adherence to 
 which these defects and evils will be best avoided. So, if 
 parties are to be heard in denial or on explanation, and to 
 be condemned in default of either— they must have due 
 times and seasons allowed for such purposes, and such a 
 course must be prescribed for their meeting the claims or 
 charges made, as that they may have full opportunity of 
 stating all that they desire to state which is relevant to the 
 matter, and none of evading or deviating from the ques- 
 tions to be considered of. So, again, if he who is to judge 
 between the parties is not to ?,dopt that course of inquiry 
 and hearing which he in his discretion may in each indi- 
 vidual case choose to direct— then must it be settled by 
 what course a question of disputed law may best be dis- 
 cussed and considered of, or a question of disputed fact 
 best be tried and examined, allowing to each party the 
 means of adducing all available testimony on points of 
 fact, and all applicable arguments upon points of law. If 
 all representations by witnesses, or through the medium of 
 writings and documents, are not to be admissible and heard 
 as evidence upon matters of fact, and upon equal terms as 
 regards its weight, of whatsoever quality it may be, and 
 from whatever quarter it may chance to come — then must 
 some general rules be laid down as to incompetency in some 
 parties to give testimony, whether from the infamy of their 
 characters, or their defective understanding, or their bias 
 through some serious interest at stake in the question to be 
 decided ; and also as to the inadmissibility of some quali- 
 ties of evidence, from not being relevant to the matter
 
 3J0 OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 
 
 previously put in dispute, or from being merely the state- 
 ment of absent parties, and not within the actual knowledge 
 of the witness, or from other such causes. For, it is to be 
 borne in mind, that the legitimate object of all rules in the 
 respect of evidence is to ensure, as far as possible, the true 
 knowledge of facts. The question for consideration is, 
 whether the admission of all sorts of evidence or testimo- 
 ny—that which a party interested may give — that which a 
 witness may relate as said by others who are absent — that 
 which an absent party may write— that which a husband 
 or wife may say for or against each other— that which an 
 infamous or perjured person may state, and so on— may not 
 as often lead to falsehood, and the disguise or concealment, 
 as to the establishment, of truth. If there is any justice 
 in such apprehension, it must follow that sound reason, 
 much insight into the moral qualities of human nature, and 
 an extensive acquaintance with the business of mankind in 
 civil life, must be exercised in the framing a body of rules 
 for that department of judicial procedure which regulates 
 the reception, or the rejection, and the appreciation of evi- 
 dence. Again, in the order of delivering judgments obvious 
 topics for consideration arise ; such as the expedient 
 publicity, the assignment of reasons, the notice to parties 
 concerned in order to their presence, and the mode of so- 
 lemnly recording the decisions. So also, if any means for 
 rectification of judgments pronounced are to be allowed — the 
 modes, and the terms of appeal, the quality of the appellate 
 tribunal, and the limitations of the power of appeal, 
 have to be ordained — with so much prudence as that, while, 
 on the one hand, a check is afforded against ignorant 
 or heedless adjudications, and a thorough deliberation on 
 difficult points of inquiry is ensured — efficient obstacles may 
 be supplied, on the other, to vain and vexatious litigation. 
 Lastly, if the execution of judgments requires any safe- 
 guards against oppression, and any forces to cope with re- 
 sistance or evasion— a regulated course, and prescribed
 
 OF THE COBE OF JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 3 J J 
 
 methods, have to be ascertained, whereby judgments may 
 be made effectual according to their strict objects, and all 
 deviations from them be restrained. 
 
 In such or similar details must every system of judicial 
 procedure be occupied; and, so necessary a part is it of 
 administrative justice, that the merit of the whole judicial 
 system in every civilized counfry is mainly to be judged 
 of according to the quality of this portion of it. Its im- 
 portance in the laws of every country would appear 
 from the circumstance of its preceding even the rules 
 for ascertainment of civil rights, and for the redress and 
 punishment of wrongs. Even while all rights, and all 
 qualities and amount of redress and punishment, are left to 
 the consciences or arbitrary will of those who wield the powers 
 of Government, the methods for hearing, trying, adjudicat- 
 ing, a?id enforcing obedience are usually regulated with, 
 some detail, and on some principles of equity, as between 
 man and man. In India, this is the only department of 
 the judicial system which has been reduced into any thing 
 like a systematic code ; for he who shall examine the re- 
 gulations of Government will find that the processes of the 
 law, and the modes of procedure, occupy almost all that body 
 of the volume which is not dedicated to the collection of 
 revenue — and the previous prevailing laws of the land have 
 been left but partially modified, and iudeed almost un- 
 touched.
 
 SECTION xnr. 
 
 Of the evils arising from a defective method of Judicial 
 
 Procedure. 
 
 Still, it is by slow degrees that nations, as they emerge 
 from barbarism, perceive the advantages of a detailed 
 system of uniform rules for judicial procedure; and those 
 who either will not, or cannot, justly reflect on the nature 
 of its objects, not uncommonly hold a language worthy of 
 a barbarous age. It is still made a question by some, 
 whether common sense would not suggest, that every judge 
 should receive with equal attention all complaints— should 
 prosecute his enquiries, according as the individual circum- 
 stances of each case might suggest to his uncontrolled views 
 — should give his judgment of the law, and extort obedience 
 to his decision, in such manner and by such means as his 
 sense of justice and expediency may dictate. I have al. 
 ready adverted to the importance of clear and certain 
 rules of law for the settlement and protection of rights; 
 and most of my observations will equally apply to this 
 portion of such rules as are concerned in regulating details 
 of Procedure. It seems fit, however, that I should further 
 enforce those general observations, by a few others of more 
 specific application in manifesting the mischiefs of a de- 
 fective system of judicial administration— for it is certain 
 that, as it is sometimes said that such 'plan of Government 
 is best which is best administered, so with much more 
 truth may it be declared that the most perfect code of 
 civil rights, and of crime, may become the mere engine 
 of oppression, unless the administration of it be regulated 
 by a clear and certain method of procedure.
 
 EVILS OF DEFECTS IN JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 3^3 
 
 It must he obvious that where the judge has no guide, 
 save his own discretion, in his course of hearing and prose- 
 cuting inquiries, or in his mode of enforcing obedience to his 
 judgments, the course of all investigations, and adminis- 
 tration of the settled law, must vary according to the talents, 
 and also according to the disposition, of the judge. New, 
 and different, and often contrariant, modes of enquiry will 
 be adopted by each separate judge. The ignorance, or the 
 weak understanding, of one man may betray his integrity 
 into errors subversive of justice — the abiliti . rmay 
 
 facilitate the wilful partialities which a malevolent or cor- 
 rupt inclination may inspire It will always he in the 
 judge's power to make the details of each case before his con- 
 sideration hear whatever complexion may suit his 1 
 views -'but, whether those views !)•• right or • :, mul 
 whether the details he full, and true, and fair, must altoge- 
 ther depend on the mental and moral qualities of 
 We may he sure that uncontrolled power naturally to 
 
 corruption, and that the uninform lerstanding natural* 
 
 ly deviates into error. But where no certain pre 
 rules supply a check, or impart instruction, it. is manifestly 
 vain to seek either from the uncontrolled will, or from the 
 common ignorance, of superior authority. The arbitrary 
 judge can scarce be blamed for pursuing the dictates even 
 of a defective understanding, in default ofany other rule of 
 guidance ; ami he may defy the scrutiny which woul 1 dis- 
 tinguish ' el ween the wilful abandonment of what a natural 
 sense of ju ti ts, and the inability to porceive it. 
 
 The controlling authority of a superior affords no security 
 either for a sounder intellect, or a more upright disposition. 
 When, tip , the discretion of the judge, and not any 
 
 settled rules, shall determine his course of executing his 
 functions.it seems plain that, even under the best code of 
 laws, prescribi >t is right and prohibiting what is wrong, 
 
 there is no greater certainty of the prevalence of true justice,
 
 314 EVILS OF DEFECTS IN JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 
 
 than there is the certainty of wisdom without learning, and of 
 integrity without any checks upon corruption. 
 
 If it. were conceded that the utmost efficiency in point of 
 intellectual power, and the purest moral sense, should 
 characterise the judge, yet, in the absence of any regulated 
 system of procedure, would his ablest efforts often be thwart- 
 ed, and as often be encumbered, with doubts, delays, and 
 difficulties. When every suitor or accuser can have access 
 to the ear of the judge in whatever manner and by what- 
 ever course his own views of his interests, his own cunning, 
 or his own excited feelings, may prompt — no common rules 
 existing for the equal restraint and equal instruction of all — 
 these two results may be expected : first, that the judge 
 must be continually exj osed to unfair attempts to bias his 
 mind ; and, secondly, that his examinations will be loaded 
 ■with irrelevant inquiries leading to no definite end. Hav- 
 ing no guide as to what statements he ought to receive, and 
 
 c 
 
 what to reject, or when and how they are to be delivered to 
 him, or by what course they are to be made known to and 
 answered by the opposite party, he must admit alt repre- 
 sentations, or else run the risk of repressing those which 
 may be the most important. Hence arises that custom of 
 private petitioning, so common among people whose laws 
 are not administered according to any settled rules or forms. 
 Hence all those arts and contrivances, by which the design- 
 ing and dishonest seek to create a secret influence, are en- 
 couraged. The impartial, and conscientious judge will, indeed, 
 resolve to deal openly, and may disclose to each party every 
 act done and every allegation made. But it will then be- 
 come obvious to what confusion and imperfect results such 
 a course of indiscriminate hearing and examination would 
 lead. As the matters alleged on each side are likely to be 
 numerous, indistinct, and various— so must the points to be 
 proved be as various and uncertain also. It will be impossi- 
 ble for either party to know which of them may be consider-
 
 EVILS OF DEFECTS IN JUDICIAL PROCEDURE. 
 
 31. 
 
 ed altogether unimportant, and often difficult to know which 
 may be the most important to be established. Mew matter 
 for enquiry may continually be advanced, which either 
 side may require time and opportunity to answer or disprove. 
 There being no settled rules for the reception or rejection of 
 evidence, the parties can never know beforehand what will 
 be admissible, and what not. Thus it will be impossible 
 that either party can be certainly prepared at the time of tri- 
 al, either as regards the nature and extent of the testimony 
 he ought to adduce, or the quality of the witness who may 
 be allowed to testify. Reference must be made to the judge 
 for directions at every step — and he becomes alternately the 
 adviser of each party, instead of the indifferent arbitrator 
 between both. Much more might be said in exposition of 
 the mischiefs of a mere discretionary course of administer- 
 ing the law, but it needs some illustration by detailed exam- 
 ples to make them thoroughly comprehended. To give a 
 general notion of the nature and-objects of a regulated plan 
 of judicial procedure is all that can be aimed at in a. 
 discourse like this.
 
 SECTION XIV. 
 
 That the laws of a country ought to depend on certain 
 
 general principles, and, be arranged according to some 
 
 system — the knowledge of which forms a Science. 
 
 All knowledge of which (he details can he reduced under 
 certain- gei rules, founded on rational principles, 
 
 becomes a science. As jurisprudence, which inculcates 
 the laws of laws, or (he principles on which all laws for 
 the clue a< ition of justice ought to be founded— 
 
 (which principles fire derived from observation on the na- 
 ture of man in sojciety, and on the qualities and tendencies 
 of political Government) -must itself be a science, so, also, 
 must a knowledge of the few or rules of justice, as estab- 
 lished in every free and civilized nation, become a science. 
 The construction of a body of laws, whereby the rights of 
 property may he secured, and the person may he protected 
 from injury, is no more than the adaptation of the princi- 
 ples of administrative justice to the affairs of man in so- 
 ciety. Among a savage people, without any form of con- 
 stitutional Government, among whom there exist but few- 
 rights of property, and the only personal injury to be pro- 
 vided against is corporal violence, the rules of justice are 
 necessarily very scanty. Under a despotic Government, 
 where arbitrary will decides all rights, and pronounces upon 
 all wrongs, the laws may, also, be simple and few — for 
 under such a Government no man can claim any thing as 
 surely and independenlly his own, and every man is expos- 
 ed to suffer without possibility of redress what some other 
 may choose to inflict. But under constitutional Govern- 
 ments, and among a people abounding in all the commod-
 
 Or JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW AS SCIENCES. 3^-7 
 
 ities and wealth which go to make up the resources and 
 enjoyments of civilized life, I he case is very different. 
 Among such a people we roust hear of property in land, 
 and the various modifications of such property — of property 
 in an infinite number at.d variety of goods — of descents 
 and successions — of transfers, conveyances, and contracts — 
 of differences in rank and condition, giving rise to dis- 
 tinctions in rights and privileges. Under Governments 
 where the life and the liberty of the subject is precious, and 
 his rights of property held sacred, no man can be deprived 
 of either without careful and regulated inquiry, and without 
 the fullest means afforded of defence. Hence, among free 
 and civilized nations, the laws and rules of justice cease to 
 be obvious to every man's plain uninstructed understanding, 
 or to be dependent on his uncontrolled discretion : they be- 
 come multiplied in proportion to the amount and variety of 
 rights, and to their progress in freedom and wealth. The 
 knowledge of the law necessarily becomes an object of la- 
 borious study— for the judge must decide, and he who would 
 be an adviser and practitioner in the law must perform his 
 task, not according to their own crude uninformed notions 
 of what is right and wrong, but from the suggestions of a 
 mind stored with a vast mass of distinct rules, and with an 
 insight info the principles on which those rules are founded, 
 and also with a capacity to apply these rules and princi- 
 ples to the infinite variety of circumstances, which in the 
 dealings of mankind give occasion to contest and doubt. 
 
 It is the common complaint of the vulgar, and of such as 
 do not weigh such considerations as these, that the admi- 
 nistration of justice according to systematic law, is tedious, 
 troublesome, and expensive. Such complaints do not. arise 
 among barbarous and misgoverned nations — for where there 
 is little property, or where the greater share of it is mono- 
 polized by the ruler himself or his favorites and sup- 
 porters and despotic power orders every thing, there is
 
 gig OF JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW AS SCIENCES. 
 
 little occasion for litigation, or suits, and wrangling. But 
 these complaints prevail most where the rights of the 
 people are most numerous and various, and where the 
 rules for their support against violations are most 
 cautious and precise. In other words they prevail 
 most in proportion to the prosperity, wealth, and ci- 
 vilization of the people among whom they arise. But, 
 if all these rules and forms of justice — leading as they do 
 to harassing delays, trouble, and expence, as well in the 
 establishment as in the defence of rights — are considered 
 with the relation they bear to the security of property and 
 of the person, and to the degree of freedom enjoyed by the 
 subject under a wise and liberal Government, they- will be 
 found to constitute the necessary result, and the price which 
 must be paid for such security and freedom, on which the 
 prosperity and wealth of a nation must depend. The ordinary 
 and unreflecting portion of mankind, who view with a partial 
 eye their own interests, and (heir claims or wrongs when, 
 they happen to be contested or denied, are impatient at all 
 restraints upon a speedy decision, and at all forms which 
 stand between them and what they deem justice. But, it 
 should be recollected, that these same forms of justice, 
 which are to them so irksome and inexpedient in cases 
 which in their partial view may erroneously appear to be 
 plain and simple, are the safeguards against such as may 
 be put forward by the crafty and dishonest, and a pro- 
 tection against judgments given according to no fixed 
 rule of right, but according to mere wayward and wil- 
 ful discretion. If we enquire among what nations the 
 course of judicial decision is the most speedy, cheap, 
 and conclusive, we shall assuredly discover it among those 
 lawless tribes who remain nearest to the state of nature, or 
 among those nations, in which the bulk of the people are little 
 better than slaves. Whether in the horde of Tartar savages, 
 amongst whom property has scarce a name, or under the
 
 OF JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW AS SCIENCES. 3}$ 
 
 most ancient Mussulman Governments where the word of 
 the Prince or Magistrate is the inflexible law, every matter 
 of dispute is quickly and finally settled. The judge de- 
 cides as he pleases — he is guided by no rules — and he is 
 swayed by no responsibility. It is indifferent to him how 
 he decides, so that he determines the case — and obedience 
 is equally and peremptorily exacted, let the decision be 
 what it may. To desire such a measure, and such a course, 
 of cheap and speedy justice, is to desire such a condition of 
 the people as can alone admit of it. It is to desire that 
 there should be but few rights, and a small amount of pro- 
 perty to decide about — it is to desire political slavery rather 
 than liberty — and that right and wrong should become 
 mere matter of chance.
 
 SECTION XV. 
 Of the quality of the English system of Law, 
 
 The English nation enjoys a most eminent degree of 
 political freedom, because its Government, is settled upon 
 just principles and constitutional rules. Its laws and rules 
 of justice under which that freedom is preserved, under 
 which property is secured, and the person is protected, have 
 long ago been laid down and fixed — growing up under the 
 watchful care of learned, able, and virtuous men throughout 
 many ages : Under these laws the national wealth, and the 
 national power, has increased to a height beyond that with 
 which any Empire on the earth has hitherto been favored. 
 Amidst the many gradations of rank and condition — 
 amidst the infinity of rights, and modifications of rights, 
 which these gradations and the accumulation of pro- 
 perty, with its endless variety of uses, have given rise 
 to — and amidst the complicated and numerous causes 
 for controversy naturally consequent on this position 
 of society— -the law of the land lias provided the cer- 
 tain means of assurance and redress, applicable to the 
 peculiar circumstances of almost every case. Jurispru- 
 dence has become a science, as well as the law depending on 
 its principles ; to the study and exposition of which men of 
 cultivated understanding devote their lives. For the learn- 
 ing, as well as the integrity, not only of the judges who admi- 
 nister the law, but of the counsellors and practitioners who 
 advise or assist in its efficient operation, thqre is every secu- 
 rity which interest, and a sense of honor, and a love of reputa- 
 tion can supply. It may be supposed, therefore, that among 
 such a nation the administration of justice must be eminent-
 
 OF THE ENGLISH SYSTEM OF LAW. 321 
 
 ly exact — that able and upright judges have but to open 
 their eyes and see — that vexatious or ignorant litigation must 
 be vain, and therefore likely to be rare — and that wrongs 
 should diminish in proportion to the certainty and adequacy 
 of retribution. How happens it, then, it may be asked, 
 that so great a number of legal Courts, with every 
 variety and quality of jurisdiction, should be spread over 
 the land — that lawsuits, controverted claims, and criminal 
 punishments, should abound wherever the English law pre- 
 vails—and that accusations of its uncertainty should be as 
 common as those of its delay and expence ? 
 
 That much of this accusation arises from ignorant clamour 
 and misconception is an assertion so easily made that it will 
 meet with little attention, unless borne out by some proof ; but 
 to exhibit decisive proofs would lead to a lengthened discus- 
 sion. Considering, however, that all human institu- 
 tions and regulations run into abuse, it will deserve remark 
 how seldom occasions are taken to propose before the legis- 
 lature, amendments and alterations in the settled laws, and 
 how few are the calls for such legislative interference except 
 with a view to the correction of those abuses from which the 
 most perfect judicial system can never be exempt. An ex- 
 planation is sometimes offered, that lawyers and judges 
 gain by the uncertainties, defects, and abuses of the law ; 
 bnd therefore they will uphold them, having as a body power 
 f nough to control the united voice of the people, and the 
 supreme legislature itself. Such an explanation implies that 
 a large majority of these functionaries are among the most 
 mercenary and dishonest of mankind— that their cunning 
 and their talents are more than a match for the general sense 
 of the nation — and that their influence in the state surpasses 
 that of the executive powers ofGovernment backed by the sup- 
 port of a i oppressed people. How far this class of functionaries 
 may merit such a character, whether of corruption or of po- 
 litical power in the state, may perhaps be sufficiently an-
 
 qOO OF THE ENGLISH SYSTEM OF LAW. 
 
 sweredby a reference to public opinion— but it is certain that 
 from this class have sprung all those laws which have sewed 
 most in fixing and preserving the free constitution of the 
 Government, and the most important of those also which 
 concern the due and equal administration of justice between 
 man and man. Indeed, it would be very difficult to shew 
 how the personal interests, any more than the reputation of 
 those distinguished lawyers, whose opinions have influence 
 in the state, can be advanced by the maintenance of profes- 
 sional abuses. A more rational and consistent explanation 
 why the legislature is far less occupied in correcting the 
 laws as they stand, and so much more in adding to and im- 
 proving them, according as the new creations of pro- 
 perty and the continual changes in the condition of the 
 people suggest, may perhaps be this — that those who un- 
 derstand thoroughly the reasons and principles of the En- 
 glish laws, and their operation, seldom see occasion for es- 
 sential alterations ; and thftse who yield to their own ill-con- 
 sidered notions or those of others, in seeking their amend- 
 ment, either find the task they undertake beyond their men- 
 tal strength, or become convinced, upon calm investigation 
 and the just reasoning of such as are most competent to 
 judge, that their projects are mischievous, and their corn- 
 plaints without foundation. 
 
 It would be an undertaking not more curious than profit- 
 able to compare the operation and results of the English 
 system of law, with those of the various systems adopted in 
 other civilized countries— with reference, not to its effects 
 on political freedom (which, however, is one important ob- 
 ject of laws) — but merely with reference to those main ob- 
 jects of administrative justice between man and man — the 
 security of property, and the security of the person. 
 
 As far as regards the expence of litigation for the recove- 
 ry of rights, and for the prosecution of crimes, it may be al-
 
 OF THE ENGLISH SYSTEM OF LAW. 
 
 323 
 
 lowed that it is an evil attending the administration of Eng- 
 lish law far surpassing that which attends the course of 
 administering justice in most other countries in the world. 
 I3ut the expence of litigation increases in proportion to those 
 other characteristics in the administration of the law which 
 tend most materially to the ends of justice. It increases in 
 proportion to the amount and precision of those rules which 
 ascertain rights, which protect every man in the enjoyment of 
 them, and multiply the means of defence against unjust de- 
 mands and accusations. It increases in proportion to the in- 
 tegrity, the learning, the competency, and the honorable sta- 
 tion in society, of those who dedicate themselves to profes- 
 sional and judicial duties. When objects of this nature are 
 the real and only causes of increased expence, they more than 
 compensate for an evil which thus becomes of unavoidable 
 necessity. The absence of such causes will ensure cheap 
 judgments, but not cheap justice : and it scarce needs to be 
 noticed what an encouragement, to vexatious and vindictive 
 litigation must be the opportunity afforded of embarking in 
 it without personal trouble or charge. And, let it be further 
 observed, that the cheapness of judicial decisions is not al- 
 ways and necessarily in proportion to the absence of such 
 causes of expence as these I have enumerated. It is assert- 
 ed by a writer on the judicial system of India that litigation 
 in the Sadder Courts of India is, in the result, at least as 
 expensive as that in the Supreme Courts. But it will hard- 
 ly be said that the above noticed causes of expence apply in 
 an equal degree to the system of law as administered in 
 both those classes of Courts. 
 
 In regard, however, to the comparative prevalence of 
 crime, and of delays and uncertainties in the administra- 
 tion of the law, under the English judicial system, and 
 under that which obtains in some other countries, an inqui- 
 ry has been madp, the results of which deserve attention 
 and command confidence. It has been ascertained that in
 
 324 QF THE ENGLISH SYSTEM OF LAW. 
 
 Sweden, which there is no reason to distinguish as the 
 worst governed of European nations, or the least advanced 
 in civilization, the convictions for crimes, punishable as such 
 by all civilized Governments are, compared with those in 
 England, as four to one at least. (Laing's Travels in Swe- 
 den, 1838.) It has been shewn by a writer on the judicial 
 system of India, as regulated by its local Governments for 
 administration in the provinces, that the time occupied, on 
 the average, in obtaining a decision is at least four times 
 as long as that expended in the average course of litigation 
 in England; and that, whereas scarce one judgment out of 
 thousands under the English law is appealed against, and 
 not one in six reversed or even altered, out of those which 
 are appealed, no less than one-half of the original decisions 
 are overruled or amended by the Courts of Appeal, under 
 that administered in the Indian provinces. And we may be 
 sure that, when such is the case, almost every decision by 
 the original Court either is appealed against, or would be so 
 if it could.
 
 SECTION XVI. 
 
 Of the causes of Litigation, independently of the quality 
 
 of Laws. 
 
 Thus much I have thought it not impertinent to observe 
 in proof of the misapprehension of those who inconsiderately 
 urge peculiar defects and faults in the English judicial sys- 
 tem, but it will be more to the purpose to advert to some of 
 those causes of litigation which must ever prevail, not only 
 under that system, but under the most perfect code of laws 
 that human wisdom can construct. 
 
 Among these causes are the human passions, which will 
 never cease to breed violence 'and fraud ; and which even 
 repels the bulk of mankind from making voluntary compen- 
 sation for injuries that cannot be denied. There are, fur- 
 ther, the mistakes and uncertainties, as regards facts. 
 Such may arise from corrupt evidence, inciting to unjust 
 claims, or defeating those which are just — or from deficient 
 evidence, which may induce as "well the wrongful as the 
 rightful claimant to hold by what he may happen to possess 
 — or from erroneous evidence, which may lead the most up- 
 right to litigation under a misconception of right. To these 
 causes must be added the long list of those springing from the 
 frequent necessity of seizing and distributing property by 
 legal processes ; as,, on occasions of insolvency, or of the con- 
 fiiction of numerous creditors of the same party, or of resort 
 to mortgaged property for the satisfaction of debts. And, 
 lastly, among the principal causes of necessary litigation 
 must be enumerated the doubts in the application of even 
 the plainest rules of law, according as complicated cases, 
 and new combinations of circumstances arise. When this
 
 326 0F THE M0ST COMMON SOURCES OF LITIGATION. 
 
 large amount of the unavoidable sources of litigation is 
 subtracted from the whole sum of those which enter into the 
 administration of justice under the English law, it will pro- 
 bably be found that but a small portion of that litigation is 
 derived from such sources as the uncertainty, or obscurity, 
 or defects of the law itself, or the unrighteous claims and 
 accusations which such a state of the law is calculated to 
 beget. It is, indeed, rather a subject of surprise that, 
 among a swarming population enjoying so large a share of 
 personal and political freedom — among whom the smallest 
 aggression against the person or the property has its speci- 
 fic legal remedy— among whom the presumed innocence of 
 every man is supplied by the amplest means of defence-r- 
 among whom commercial transactions are of such unbound- 
 ed extent, and property subdivided and qualified in a 
 thousand ways— the various and complicated rights of 
 every individual should be so exactly adjusted and secured, 
 as to lead to so little litigation as does actually prevail. 
 We must rather look for proofs of the demerit of any judici- 
 al system in the amount of erroneous and contradictory 
 judgments, than in that of the number, duration, or ex- 
 pence of the causes tried.
 
 SECTION XVII. 
 
 Of the expediency of reducing the laws of a Country 
 to a systematic Code. 
 
 It must be allowed, notwithstanding what has been said, 
 that the administration of justice according to the laws of 
 England is not only encumbered, with many imperfec- 
 tions in details, but that the legal system itself stands in 
 need of amendment. In the application of the existing 
 laws to the infinite variety of new cases, and new combi- 
 nations of circumstances, the decrees of the Courts neces- 
 sarily multiply to a vast extent. As each of these decrees 
 is an authority and precedent for like judgments to be 
 pronounced in similar cases, they become so many rules of 
 law. Bat, since it is seldom that two cases which give rise 
 to controversy can be exactly alike in all their circum- 
 stances, the distinctions which exist often occasion differ- 
 ences of opinion, where no difference in principle really 
 exists — and thus arise uncertainties, and even contradictions, 
 in (he very rules of law themselves. [Moreover, not oidy 
 e rules of low, but also those express laics which the 
 supreme authority from time to time enacts, and which 
 are often confined to peculiar evils, or directed to tempora- 
 ry objects, gradually become inapplicable to the altered 
 times and condition of the people. The accumulation of 
 these rules of law involved in judicial decisions upon indi- 
 vidual cases, and of these express enactments of (he legis- 
 lature suggested, from temporary causes, grows al length to 
 be too vast for the grasp of the human intellect, and the 
 ssiiy becomes apparent of correcting inconsistencies, 
 and of digesting and arranging the whole heap under gene-
 
 328 EXPEDIENCY OF REDUCING LAWS TO A CODE. 
 
 ral rules and principles. In England this task, how- 
 ever ably and skilfully fulfilled, has been left to the 
 labour of private authors and compilers—but such 
 a digest of * the national law is the more appro- 
 priate task of the supreme legislature ; not more for the 
 sake of ensuring uniformity and completeness, than for that 
 of fixing upon that law the stamp of authority. This it is 
 to reduce the laws of the land to a systematic code— a work 
 which, as it is the most laborious and the most difficult in 
 which the powers of the mind can be engaged, so is it that 
 which most conduces to the perfection of administrative jus- 
 tice, and the consequent prosperity of a people. It may be 
 expedient, therefore, in concluding this discourse, to point 
 out those general characteristics in the prevalent laws of a 
 country which suggest the reduction of them into a code. 
 
 The reasons which should induce the formation of the 
 laws of a country into a regular code, are — 1st, that they 
 have become obscure through antiquity, or through changes 
 in times and the circumstances of the people — 2ndly, that 
 they are not easy of access ; as when they are dispersed; 
 amongst various treatises, argumentative disquisitions, re- 
 ports of judgments pronounced, and enactments of the legis- 
 lature comprehending many unconnected subjects — 3rdly, 
 when the laws have become bulky and numerous, ho as to 
 abound in repetitions, and to comprise a multitude of rules 
 and regulations upon the same topics without any substan- 
 tial distinctions— 4thly, when laws have been ill-prepared 
 through the incompetency of the framers, and ill-arranged 
 through neglect ; whereby confusion and doubts are chiefly 
 caused, and contradictions insensibly creep in — and, lastly, 
 when new laws have been prematurely introduced, before 
 the state of a country, or the condition of a people has be- 
 come adapted to the change ; as when a new Government 
 introduces its own laws into a foreign country, without due 
 consideration of the peculiar national customs and habits.
 
 EXPEDIENCY OF REDUCING LAWS TO A CODE. 329 
 
 All these reasons for a reform in national laws, with the 
 exception of the last, do with more or less force apply to 
 the English judicial system ; and it is a mark, of the en- 
 lightened views of the present age that this should be seen 
 and acknowledged. The extensive amendments, and con- 
 solidations of various distinct masses of the English laws, 
 which these views have lately led to, gives an earnest of fur- 
 ther efForts towards accomplishing the greatest and most 
 beneficial of all human undertakings — the systematic digest 
 of the whole body of the national law. So vast and compre- 
 hensive, a labour, requiring the united and long continued 
 exertions of many powerful minds, may appear to surpass 
 the strength of any single effort of Government , and per- 
 haps it may be wiser to await the gradual correction and 
 digest of each distinct department, than to attempt at once 
 an uniform arrangement of the whole body of the laws. 
 When, however, the cautious vigilance, the copious remedies, 
 and the ample securities, which' pervade the administration 
 of justice under the English law, are referred to as the ef- 
 ficient causes of its practical merit as it stands, it should 
 be recollected that the more plentiful the materials are of a 
 legal code, and the sounder the principles on which they 
 depend, the more is the construction of a code facilitated, 
 and the more perfect may it be expected to prove. 
 
 Rut, if most of the reasons I have above enumerated have 
 more or less application to the state of the English law, they 
 all of them more unquestionably bespeak the expediency of 
 a digested arrangement of the laws which are to prevail in 
 governing the administration of justice in India. The mate- 
 rials, indeed, of such a code are far more scanty, and the 
 principles of the existing native laws must be acknowledged 
 to be far less sound. But if the construction of a body of 
 wise and beneficial laws for this country becomes, therefore, 
 the more difficult, it becomes also the more necessary. 
 The original laws of the various tribes and castes, living
 
 330 EXPEDIENCY OF REDUCING LAWS TO A CODE. 
 
 under the guidance of different religious doctrines, under 
 various forms of government, were, like the earliest and 
 imperfect laws of all other nations, identified with their 
 precepts of religion — and so they still remain — although 
 the rights and conduct of men in civil society have but in few 
 respects any natural connection with their duties towards 
 the deity, their forms of worship, or their tenets of faith ; 
 and, amidst the great differences in such forms and tenets, 
 it must appear obvious that no system for the administration 
 of justice ought to be made dependent on the casualty of 
 any particular doctrine of religious belief. It may be rea- 
 sonably surmised that, in ancient times, the distractions of 
 political change, and the oppressions of petty rulers, as they 
 may have retarded the advancement of the people of India 
 in civilization, so they may have precluded the improve- 
 ment of their laws : and we know that in more modern 
 times foreign conquests, and continual internal wars, must 
 have produced such their usual results. The ancient laws, 
 therefore, which have thus remained in their original im- 
 perfection, have gradually become more and more loaded 
 with obscurities, vagueness, and uncertainties, while com- 
 ments, constructions, and arguments have supplied the 
 place of express laws, sanctioned by just principles. It 
 must be admitted that, as the English sway has extended, 
 and its empire become consolidated, much has been attempted 
 towards regulating the administration of justice in India ; 
 but it must be admitted, at the same time, that the at- 
 tempt has been made by those who could learn but little 
 to the purpose from the native laws, and who brought but 
 little learning,either in jurisprudence generally, or in the laws 
 of their own or any other cc ntry, to bear upon their task. 
 
 * 
 
 It has been, perhaps, upon some such considerations as 
 these, and certainly upon a deliberate survey of the state 
 of the law, and the defective course of administering justice 
 throughout the Indian empire, that the supreme legisla-
 
 EXPEDIENCY OF DEDUCING LAWS TO A CODE. 33I 
 
 ture of England has, under the last Charter act detailing 
 the scheme for the future government of India, entrusted 
 to a body of Commissioners the duty of collecting materials, 
 and reporting suggestions, with the view to a digest and 
 consolidation of the judicial system of the country, What- 
 ever success may attend an undertaking involving great 
 difficulty and labour, we may hail its policy as that of a 
 beneficent Government making the prosperity of its people 
 the rule of its measures, 
 
 FIJS/ 1 S.
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Absolute Government, (Vide Arbitrary.) 
 
 Administrative Justice, what '274. 
 
 Agra, (Vide Subordinate Governments.) 
 
 Ahmedabad, 13-1,208. 
 
 Arbitrary Government, Defects in that form of Government 33, How 
 :d in what respect such form sometimes beneficial 34. May 
 be in many as well as in few 30. Evils of (14. Laws simple 
 and few under 310. 
 
 Archbishops, 82,83. 
 
 Army, (Vide Military.) 
 
 Aurungzebe, his dealings with the English 135. His power in India 141. 
 
 Balasore 35,208. 
 
 Barbarous Nations, addicted to revengeful punishments 299. Among 
 them laws simple and few 316,318. 
 
 Bengal, when first settled 134,135,208. Conquests of the English in 
 15G. Presidency of, first founded 2UU. Government of, en- 
 gaged in disputes 215. 
 
 Bills, of Parliament what, and how brought in as Statutes to be passed 
 101. Reading- of, what 101. How assented toby the Crown 
 102. 
 
 Bishops, 82,83. 
 
 Black Hole of Calcutta 157. 
 
 Bourn of Control, (Vide Control.) 
 
 Bombay, when first granted to the Company 134,208. Made Chief 
 Presidency in India 208. Limit! of the Town of, fixed by the 
 Government of Bombay 254. (Vide Subordinate Govern- 
 ments.) 
 
 Bbabmins, their unlimited and uncertain authority according to the Hin- 
 doo Sbnsters 28m 
 
 BuiTiaii Subjects, meaning of the distinction between British and Na- 
 tive Subjects 2G0. 
 
 Cadets, who 183, 2JI. 
 Calicut, 13-1,208. 
 
 Calcutta 134,209. Taken L67. Black Hole of 157. Limits of the 
 
 Town of, fixed by Bengal Government 254, 
 Cambay, 134,208. 
 Cate of Good Hors, first voyage to India by 128.
 
 n INDEX. 
 
 Carnatic, conquests of the French in 150. Nabob of, becomes depen- 
 dent on the French 150. Rival Nabob of, set up by the Eng- 
 lish 156. And established 156. 
 
 Certainty in Laws, why necessary 285. In punishments more effieaci' 
 oils than severity 302. 
 
 Changes, in Political Government, how necessary 40. By whom to be 
 introduced 41= How changes in Government produce a cer- 
 tain portion of evil 41. Why they should be gndual 41,42 
 People of warm countries averse to changes in Government 43. 
 
 Charles 2d, his Charter to the Company 134,209,236. 
 
 Charities, under the protection of the Crown 112. 
 
 Charters, meaning of the term 130. Abuse of the authorities granted 
 by 204. Nature of the authorities conferred by the early 
 Charters 206. How .lefectiie in establishing a regular Go- 
 vernment in India 206. Charter Acts, what 217- (Vide 
 Elizabeth, Charier, James, William, George.) 
 
 Checks System of, in the Government of India 261. 
 
 Church (Vide Prerogatives.) 
 
 Clive, his victory of Plassy 157. 
 
 Civil Service discussion as to the mode of appoin'ingto 184. Defects 
 in the system of appointing to 184. Advancement of Natives 
 to appointments made in 189. By whom appointments in In- 
 dia made 250. 
 
 Civil Code of Rights, what 292. How distinguished from Criminal 
 Code 294. 
 
 Code when and why laws of a country should be embodied in a systema- 
 tic Code 327. The reasons inducing the formation of such 
 Codes 328. Required for the English Laws, and more so for 
 the Local Laws of India 329. (Vide Civil Code, Criminal 
 Code.) 
 
 Commanders-in-Chief how appointed 183,216,221,224. Their rank 
 and limited authority 221. 
 
 Commission, Law Commission for consolidating the Judicial System of 
 
 India 330. 
 Committees of Court of Dihectors, have no powers in themselves 
 
 177- (Vide Court of Directors.) 
 
 Commons Hocsjb of, what 88. Number of Members, qualifications of 
 Members 89. Of Electors 89. Mode of electing Members 90. 
 Has sole power of Taxation 96- Influence of in the English 
 Government 98. Freedom of Speech 1 00. Mode of passing Acts 
 100. President, or Speaker of 100. Power of bringing charges 
 against great public delinquents before the House of Lords 
 104. (Vide Parliament, Members, Electors.) 
 
 Company, what the East India Company is 119. Meaning of the term 
 Company 123. Origin and formation of the East India Com- 
 pany 128,204. Quality of Associated Companies for trading 
 125. Of Companies which are Corporations 130. East India 
 Company a Corporation 130. Trade their sole object for 
 many vears 133,134. Their Charter from Elizabeth 131,204. 
 Their" Charter from Charles 2d 134,209. Their exclusive 
 rights of trade invaded by a rival Company 136. Newly orga- 
 nized and united with the English Company 136,137,210.
 
 INDEX- ut 
 
 Charter from William 3d, 1S7.237. Surrender their previous 
 Charters and are governed under the Charter of William 3d 
 137,210. . Their trade gradually abolished, the effects of this 
 159. 
 
 Conquest, all schemes of repudiated by the English Governmant 247. 
 Control, Board of 192 Origin of 192. Members of 193. Oath of 
 
 the Members 193. Powers pud Functions of 194. Beneficial 
 
 effects of 105,216. 
 
 Constitution ok England, what, and how established 71,73. 
 
 Corporations, what 130. East India Company a Corporation 130,204. 
 
 Cossisibusar, 204,135,208. 
 
 Councillors (ViJe Members in Council.) 
 
 Councils, course of proceeding at 226. All Acts to be done in name 
 of the Councils 216. Minutes in Council, what 226. (Vide 
 Members in Council ) 
 
 Counties Number of, in Great Britain and Ireland 88. 
 
 Countries External Condition op, necessarily affects their form of 
 Government 43. Influences, manners, habits, and feelings. 43 
 
 Court of Proprietors, what, 163. Course of proceeding at 763. Mode 
 of voting 163. Their Legislative powers 104. 
 
 Court of Directors, what and how held 174. Chairman and Deputy 
 Chairman, who, and kheir duties 174. Committees IJo. Of 
 Correspondence 175. OfSeereay 175. Of Accounts 176. Of 
 the Treasury 177- Functions of the Court 179. How their 
 authority is Supreme 179. Powers of Court restricted and 
 guided by Laws ISO. How all their Proceedings controlled by 
 Board of Control 181. Powers of the Court in suspending the 
 sole authority of Governors in India 132. Of the appointments 
 in their gift 18-'. (Vide Directors.) 
 
 Coubt of Judicature, Supreme Court in Bengal established 215. Its 
 disputes with the Government 215. Supreme Courts at Madras 
 and Bombay established 217. The powers of the Supreme 
 Courts formerly of, rejecting regulations 240. This authority 
 repealed 245. These Supreme Courts not to be abolished by 
 Supreme Government 2l0. Regularly constituted Courts of 
 Law a necessary portion of Judicial Procedure 300. How 
 Courts of Law should deliver their judgments 310. Rules 
 necessary for rectifying their judgments 310. 
 
 Courts MARTIAL on Natives (Vide Regulations.) 
 
 Criminal Code, what 292. How distinguished from Civil Code 205,296- 
 (Vide Punishment.) 
 
 Crown (Vide Queen, Prerogatives.) 
 
 Cl'ddalore, Settlement of 153. 
 
 Despotic Govfrnmknt (Vide Arbitrary Government.) 
 
 Delay, in Punishment reduces its efficiency 303. 
 
 DeWANNBB, rights of, what and when conferred 213. 
 
 Directors, how qualified individually 169. All English subjects may 
 become so 169. Their oath of office 1?0. Removals of in 
 case of absence, or for misconduct 17L Number of, and how
 
 iv INDEX. 
 
 elected J 71. Their House List 172. Chairman of 175. (Vide 
 Court of) 
 
 Dutch, when first settled in India 133. Decay of their Power 148. 
 
 Duties of life spring from a sense of Justice 273. 
 o 
 
 East India Company (Vide Company.) 
 
 Election, of Political representatives, how it should he regulated 50. 
 Mode of Electing Members of Parliament 90. Election of Di- 
 rectors of the East India Company 171. (Vide Electors, Di- 
 rectors.) 
 
 Electors for Members of Parliament who, and how to be qualified 89. 
 Certain classes excluded from such right of Election, and why 
 95. (Vide Election Directors.) 
 
 Elizabeth, Queen, her first Charter to the East India Company 131,204. 
 
 Emperor, or great Mogul of India (Vide Moguls.) English, their first 
 arrival in India 118. Effects and strength of their Government 
 in India 119. Their contests with the French 152,156. Ob- 
 tain the Jaghire of Madras 156. (Vide Carnatic.) * 
 
 English Company formation of, under Charter of William 3d 13G. (Vide 
 Company.) 
 
 English Law, system of, and its quality 320. Accusations against it 321. 
 Comparison of it with other systems 322. Expences of litiga- 
 tion under English Laws 322. Crime less prevalent under it 
 than in other civilised countries 3-3. In what respects defi- 
 cient 3^7. Why the English Laws should be reduced into a 
 systematic Code 329. 
 
 Evidence certain fixed rules of necessary with a view to the just investi- 
 gation of facts 309. 
 
 Executive Government, what 106. 
 
 Factories, (Vide Settlements.) 
 
 Fort St. David, 135,208. 
 
 Fort St. George, Presidency of, when founded I34,20S. 
 
 French, tlnir settlement in India 149. Contests and influence with 
 'the Native Powers 149. Capture Madras 150. Influence over 
 the whole Deccan 150. Nabob of Carnatic made Dependent 
 on 150. Their contest with the English 156. Neglected by 
 their own Government 153. Defeated by the English and 
 their influence finally destroyed 156. 
 
 George 1st and 2d, their Charters 212. 
 
 Gogo 134,208. 
 
 Government (Vide Political Government, Arbitrary Government.) 
 
 Governments of India, Preliminary observation's on 199. Bond of 
 Connection between them, and the Government of England 257 
 Government of India not the Company's but the Queen's Go- 
 vernment 260. S\ stem of checks in the Government of India 
 261. Defects in 262. (Vide Political Government, Subordi- 
 nate Governments.)
 
 INDEX. v 
 
 Government Supreme of India, how constituted and of what members 
 composed 220. Vacancies how filled up 222,224,225. Tem- 
 porary vacancy of the Governor Generalship '223. When and 
 how vacancies supplied by the Crown '225. Its course and 
 method of procedure 226. How the Governor General may 
 act solely 228. Supreme Government may be held in any part 
 of India 230. Controlling Powers of SupremeGovernment 232- 
 M ide unlimited 234. Its Legislative powers. 230. Originally 
 defective 236,238. Progressive increase of 237- ItsLegislativc 
 powers in the Provinces 241. What granted under the Char- 
 ter Act of 1833,214. Limitations of the Legislative power 
 245,246. The exclusive powers of Supreme Government in 
 relation to Native States 247. Its controlling powers as lo 
 Revenue 24H. And as to Military Forces 248. 
 
 Government of Bengal — (Vide Bengal.) 
 
 Governments of Madras, Bombay, and Agra, — (Vide Madras, Bom* 
 bay, Agra, Subordinate Governments.) 
 
 Governors, when first appointed by that name 214, 21G. 
 
 Governor General how appointed 183,220. How his vacancy filled up 
 222,228,224. When may be filled up by the Crown 225. 
 When and bow he may excrcbe sole authority 228. May 
 assemble his Council in any part of India 230. 
 
 Governors, how appointed, 183. When first appointed by that name, 
 211,216. How and when they may exercise sole authority, 228. 
 When and bow they become extraordinary Members of the 
 Supreme Government 230. • 
 
 Govindtoue 209. 
 
 Gkatoities, limitations on the power of the Court of Directors to grant 1S2 
 
 Habits, Forms of Political Government originating partly in, and de- 
 pendent upon 37. And vary accordingly 38. Habits arise 
 partly out of external condition of countries 38 
 
 HAPPIES B, individual and social, distinction between 29. In what 
 consists social happiness 29,37. 
 
 IIoogiily, 134,208. 
 
 House of Lords, Commons. — (Vide Lords, Commons.) 
 
 Honors an I offices (vide Prerogatives, Offices.) 
 
 India, causes which have obstructed a more perfect system of Govern- 
 ment in India 61. Reasons for being content with the Bcheme 
 for Indian Government 62. Laws passed for India by the 
 English chiefly to regulate Judicial Procedure 811. The law 
 of India very defective, and why 287,329. They require to 
 be redo :ed to a systematic code 329. 
 
 Indian GOVERNMENTS— (Vide Governments.) 
 
 JAMBA 1st, bis ( barter to the East India Company 204. 2d, his Char- 
 ter 206,236. 
 
 Judge, character of a good Judge 289. In what way Judges should be 
 independent oVj.
 
 vi INDEX. 
 
 Judgments of Courts how they should be delivered 310. Rules necessary 
 for enforcing, and for rectifying 310. 
 
 Justice, the meaning of the term 271. In what the general virtue of 
 Justice consists 272. Justice prescribes all the duties of 
 life 27j?. Administrative Justice, what 274. Natural sense 
 not a sufficient guide in administering justice, 2S5. 
 
 King, (Vide Queen,) 
 
 Labor, the foundation of property 279. 
 
 Laws, objects and ends of 275. No laws ever employed in matters 
 indifferent 276. All laws obligatory on the conscience 277. 
 Why they should be certain and clear 285. Evils of uncer- 
 tainty in laws 287. They should specify and define rights 290. 
 In what manner 291. Civil code of rights, what 292. How 
 distinguished from Criminal Code 294,295. Criminal Code, 
 -what 295. How distinguished from Civil Code 295,296. Laws 
 ■when reduced to a system form a science 316. Are few and 
 simple among barbarous nations, and under despotic Govern- 
 ments 316,318. Why numerous and complicated among weal- 
 thy nations, and under well-constituted Governments 317. 
 When and why they should be reduced to a systematic Code 327. 
 (Vide English Law, India.) 
 
 Law Commission for India, — (Vide Commission.) 
 
 Legislative authority, nature of, in England 75. How constituted 76. 
 
 Legislative powers of Indian Governments, history of 236. Originally 
 defective 236,237. What defects in the Statute of 1773 con- 
 ferring them 238. What conferred by Statutes of 1781,1797, 
 240. What conferred by Statutes of 1799,1807, on the subor- 
 dinate Governments of India 238. What powers conferred on 
 the Governments of India to legislate for the provinces 241, 
 249. What conferred on the Supreme Government by the 
 Charter Act of 1833,244. (Vide Governments, Subordinate 
 Governments, Regulations.) 
 
 Limitation, how the Government of England a limited monarchy 112. 
 
 Litigation, how expences in arise 322.' Natural causes of, independ- 
 ently of the quality of laws 325. 
 
 Lords, House of, what 82. How created i 2. How summoned to Par- 
 liament 84. Power of voting by delegates 85. Have the sole 
 right of originating laws affecting their own rights as Lords of 
 Parliament 8b. Right of recording their dissent 86. 
 
 Madras taken by the French 150. Jaghire of, granted to the East India 
 Company 156. Limits of the Town to be fixed by Government 
 of Madras 254. (Vide Subordinate Governments, Presi- 
 dencies.) 
 
 Mahmoud of Ghizni, his invasions 140. 
 
 Manners, Political Government originating in, and partly dependent 
 on 37. Governments vary accordingly 38. Manners partly 
 dependent on the external condition of countries 38. (Vide 
 Political Government.)
 
 INDEX vii 
 
 Marhattas, their rise and conquests 143. Quality of their Power and 
 Government 144. Its decay 144. 
 
 Masulifatam 134,20S. 
 
 Members of Parliament, number of in -House of Commons 89. How to 
 be qualified 9. Qow elected 88,89,90. How ) returned as 
 elected 92. Not the Agents merely of those who elect them 93 
 Connexion and union between the members and their consti- 
 tuents 94. (Vide Parliament, Commons, Election, Returns.) 
 
 Members of Council, who, and how appointed, 183,203,213. How va- 
 cancies of supplied 225. When and how a Civil Servant can 
 be called in to vote specially at a Council 225. 
 
 Menu, extracts from his laws 287. 
 
 Military Fopces, powers of Supreme Government over 2 18. Powers of 
 Subordinate Governments over 253. (Vide Subordinate Go- 
 vernments, Cadets.) 
 
 Military Service, in what respect, and to what extent confined to Bri- 
 tish Subjects 251,252. (Vide Cadets.) 
 
 Ministers, of the Crown their responsibility for all public measures 107, 
 113. How chosen 113. Of the Prime Minister 114. (Vide 
 Queen Prerogatives, Executive Government.) 
 
 Minutes of Council, what 226. 
 
 Moguls, first invasions and conquest of India 140. Quality of their Go- 
 vernment in India 141. Decay of their Power 143. 
 
 Monarchies, absolute (Vide Arbitrary Governments.) 
 
 Money (Vide Prerogatives) ' 
 
 Mussulman (Vide Moguls.) 
 
 Nabob (Vide Carnatic.) 
 
 Naval, (Vide Sea.) 
 
 Natives, all legally competent to hold any offices, if qualified 250 
 Causes of their disqualifications hitherto 250. Native Subject? 
 meaning of the distinction between British and Native Sub- 
 jects 'J 00. 
 
 Native States Powers of Suprorrte and Subordinate Governments in re- 
 lation to '247,25:5. Why their dependence on British Govern- 
 ment prejudicial to their subjects 2G3. 
 
 Native Sovereigns. (Vide Sovereigns.) 
 
 Natural Law, superior to Laws of human origin 278, 
 
 Offices, what at the disposal of the Governments of India 2l!>. Natives 
 legally competent to hold, if qualified 250. Why hitherto dis- 
 qualified 250. (Vide Prerogatives) 
 
 Opening op Parliament, what 79. 
 
 ■ 
 
 Parliament, how summoned 7S. Opening what 79. Sessions of what 
 7$. Prorogation of what 78. How long to continue 78. Dis- 
 solution of what 79. Business of, not being of a Legislative 
 quality 103. Reports of Debates 104. (Vide Queen, Lords, 
 Commons.)
 
 via INDEX. 
 
 Peers, (Vide Lords.) 
 
 People of England, how they have established the English constitntion 
 73. (Vide Share.) 
 
 Petitions to the Court of Directors, nature, object, and limitations 
 of 190. 
 
 Pipley 135,208. 
 
 Plassey, Battle of 157. 
 
 Political Government. That there are certain fundamental principles to 
 be observed in all good schemes of Government 25. Origin of 
 Government 26. Great variety in 28. Objects and aims of 
 Poliiical Government 29. Should be founded on some scheme 
 or plan 32. Defects in Absolute Governments 33. Absolute 
 Governments may consist of many rulers as well as of one or a 
 few 36. The forms of Government partly arise out, and are 
 partly dependent on Feelings, Manners, and Habits 37. And 
 vary accordingly 38. Why not the same scheme, of Govern- 
 ment in India as in England 39. Changes in Political Govern- 
 ment how necessary 40. By what kind of persons to be in- 
 troduced 41. Why all changes in some degree prejudicial 41". 
 That Political changes should be gradual 42. That the form 
 of Political Government is partly dependent on the external 
 condition of countries 43. No perfect standard of 15. (Vide 
 Representation, there) 
 
 Political Liberty what 63. Pondicherry, First French settlement 149. 
 Taken by the English 157. 
 
 Population of the Company's Xerritokies in 1749 153. 
 
 Portuguese first discover passage to India by the Cape of Good Hope 123 
 Are the first Europeans who settled in India 128. Measures 
 by to engross the whole trade of India 128. Their progress 
 towards political Power in India, and causes of failure 148. 
 
 Precedence (Vide Rank.) 
 
 Prerogatives of the Crown what 106. Personal independence of the 
 Queen 106 Power to male treaties and to declaie war and 
 peace 108. The authority of dispensing Justice 1US. Bestows 
 all honors and offices 110. Orders all affairs of National Com- 
 merce 110. Exclusive powee of coining Money 111. Governs 
 the affairs of the National Religion or Church 111. Right of 
 the Qmen to choose her own Ministers of State 114. Not to 
 be affected by Laws made by the Supreme Government 245. 
 (Vide Queen, Ministers.) 
 
 President first foundation of the Boards of President in Council 208, 
 213. (Vide Governors.) 
 
 Presidencies, first foundation of 208. Put under the Bombay Govern- 
 ment 208. Limits of Territories under each to be fixed by the 
 Court of Directors 254. 
 
 Press, liberty of the 104. 
 
 Procedure, different courses of Judicial Procedure, and why 294,296. 
 Objecls of Judicial Procedure 306,308. Regularly constituted 
 Courts a necessary part of 306. Certain forms and settled 
 rules of necessary 307,311. And why so necessary 309. Should
 
 
 INDEX. ix 
 
 be guided by fixed rules of Evidence 309. Rules of Proce- 
 dure should regulate the modes of delivering, of enforcing, and 
 of rectifying judgments -S09,.n0. Evils of a defective method 
 of Judicial Piocedure 312. The Regulations of the Indian 
 Governments chiefly directed to regulate Judicial Procedure 
 311. Natural sense not a sufficient guide for, without rules 
 311. (Vide Courts of Judicature.) 
 
 Prorogation of Parliament, what 7b. 
 
 Property, a fit test as a qualification, for Electors of Political Repre- 
 sentatives 57. Origin and foundation of 279. Necessity of 
 rules for its transfer 2H2. 
 
 Proprietors of Stock, who 161. Their qualifications 162. Their 
 rights of voting 162. Estimated amount of iheir Stock 162. 
 Their lowers and Functions 164. (Vide Company,- Court of 
 Proprietors.) 
 
 Provincial Courts Powers granted to the Governments of India of Le- 
 gislating for 242. (Vide Regulations, Legislative Authority.) 
 
 Punishment of Crimes, Legitimate object of human Laws for Punish- 
 ment 302 Delay and uncertainty of Punishments reduces 
 their efficacy 303. How they should be proportioned to crime 
 303. How they require adaptation to the quality of Persons aa 
 ■well as to that of Crimes 304. Should be calculated to enforce 
 Reflection 305. (Vide Revenge,) 
 
 Queen, Her Legislative capacity 77. Her hereditary right to the 
 Throne 77- Her power of summoning Parliamen s 78. To 
 Prorogue, and to dissolve them 78. Her mode of opening Par- 
 liaments 79. The Executive Government of the Queen what 
 10B. Her dignity 114. How a limited Monarch 112. (Vide 
 Prerogatives Governments.) 
 
 Rank Precedency among Lords and the Nobility of England 83. 
 
 Rkgllating Acts of, 1773,1 784,1793,1 M3, 1833. 159. 
 
 Regulation, Power of making how limited 2^16, et. seq. The quality 
 and extent ol it originally 238. Power of passing Police Regu- 
 lations 238. Authority formerly of Supreme Courts to reject 
 241. Inexpediency of that power 241. Power to pass Regu- 
 lations for Native Courts Martial 243. 'And for Taxation 243. 
 Government Regulations chiefly directed to Judicial Procedure 
 311. (Vide Governments, Legislative Authority) 
 
 Reflections, on the quality of the Indian Governments 256. 
 
 Rllioion, (Vide Prerogatives) Representation, Perfection of all 
 systems of Government, proportionate to the perfection of 
 the system of political representation 52. Consists partly 
 in the bulk of the People having access to honors and 
 offices 52. Why such a Rcpn sentative share not a suffi- 
 cient share in the Government 54. That the system of 
 Political Representation should extend to the Supreme 
 Power in a state 55. That the bulk of the People can 
 only exercise such a share in the Supreme Power by 
 means of electing Representatives 56. Of the proper ex-
 
 s INDEX. 
 
 tent and limits of this power of Election and of the pro- 
 per qualifications of Electors 50. That the system of 
 Political Representation should limit the duration of the 
 Representative's authority 5S. Why the People of India 
 have no share in the Government by the system of Repre- 
 sentation (51, '266. Why defective on that account 267- (Vide 
 ' Governments, share ) 
 
 Representatives, (Vide Representation, Commons, Election, share Go-, 
 vernments.) 
 
 Rrturns of Members of Parliament, what 92. 
 
 Revenge, not a legitimate object of human Punishment 298. The 
 nature and object of this pa-sion 299. The gratification of 
 revenge only an object of Punishment by the laws of barba- 
 rous nations 299. (Vide Punishment.) 
 
 Revenue, when first raised from the people of India by the Company 
 136. A controlling power in the collection and applica; 
 tion of in the Supreme Government 2-18. (Vide Governments, 
 Subordinate Governments.) 
 
 Saxsettf, 154. 
 
 Science, how Jurisprudence, and systems of local Law become Sciences 
 
 3 1 6 
 Sea, Power of the Company at Sea 15 L 
 Security, personal, rights to 284. 
 Sense, natural .sense not a sufficient guide for administering Justine 
 
 285. Advocated as a guide only by ignorant and uncivilized 
 
 People 286. Not a sufficient guide for the method of Judicial 
 
 Procedure 311. (Vide Laws.) 
 
 ions of Parliiament, what 78. (Vide Parliament.) 
 Settlements or Factories, the first existing in India 133. 
 
 Share, t! 
 
 A 
 
 share 'HI. A portion of the People must necessarily ..ave a 
 share in the Administration under every form of Government 
 ■17. Why a .small portion of the People so sharing is not suf- 
 ficient IS. How large a portion of the People should have 
 a share 49. That the bulk of the People should have a share 
 60. Why a large portion cannot actually exercise the functions 
 of Government 50. Having a share in the Government, partly 
 consists in the bulk of the People having access to offices and 
 honors 52. Reflections on that quality of a good system of 
 Government, consisting in the People having a share in its Ad- 
 ministration 60. Why no Representative share by the People 
 in the Government of India 61,2(36. (Vide Representation ) 
 
 Sni.RiFrs, in what manner they superintend elections of Members of 
 Pai'liameftt 88. Their returns of Members 9'A _ 
 
 Sovereigns, Native of India, why their having no independent Political 
 Power burthensome to the People 264. 
 
 Speaker, of the Houses of Parliament 100,101. 
 
 Statctl-s, what 100. Various 21 ',1-37,192. Of 1773. 215,237,242. 
 
 ..iat the hulk of the People should exercise some share jn the 
 \d;iinistration of Government 46. What it is to have Luch a
 
 INDEX. xr 
 
 * . 
 
 1793, the first of those called Charier Acts 216. Of 1813, of 
 . 1833 217,218. Of 1781, and of 1797 212. Of 1799 and 
 1S07. 243. Of 1813, of 1814, and of 1833 244. The confu- 
 sion arising from the number and variety of 218. 
 
 Stock, East India Company's amount of 153,162. 
 
 Subordinate Governments first invested with Legislative Powers 217. 
 How Supreme Government constituted 220. How Subordi- 
 nate Governments constituted 223. How vacancies filled up 
 223,224,225. Course of proceeding at Councils 22o'. Minu- 
 tes in Council, what 226. When and how sole authority of 
 Governors exercised 228. Governors of, become extraordinary 
 Members of Supreme Government when and how 230. Powers 
 of the Subordinate Governments to legislate for the Provinces, 
 origin and progress of 241,249. Their powers and functions. 
 249. Their powers in relation to Native States 25J. In rela- 
 tion to th" Revenue 254. To fix limits to the Towns of Cal- 
 cutta, Madras, ;.ud Bombay 254. (Vide Governments, Legis- 
 lative authority.) 
 
 Succession, order of succession to the English Crown 78. (Vide 
 
 QUC'MI.) 
 
 Summoning Parliament how and when 78. (Vide Queen.) 
 
 Supreme Authority, how it consists of the Legislative authority 75. 
 (Vide Governments Courts of Judicature.) 
 
 Suuat, English S itl ;ment at, founded in 1612. 134, 20S Presidency at, 
 transferred to Bombay 208. 
 
 Taxation, sole power of taxing the p°ople of England rests with the 
 House of Commons to originate measures 96. (Vide Regula- 
 tion-.) 
 
 Trade, exclusive, first granted 131. Gradually abolished 159. Effects 
 of its total abolition 159. 
 
 Tbvatibs, prejudicial effects of certain Treaties with Native Princes 2G6\ 
 
 Trichinopoly I 
 
 Truth, the found ition and stay of Justice 273. 
 
 Vacani i: »,— i Vi i e Governments, Subordinate Governments) 
 
 VlZAGAPATAM, 135,208. ) 
 
 William 3d, Charter of 137,138,210. Its quality 211, 237. 
 
 Writers who, and what 183,250. How appointed 185, (Vide Civil 
 )
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 Los Angeles 
 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 
 
 Form L9-Series 4939
 
 JQ 
 
 22k 
 
 N823r