Series of /Ifcooern jpbilosopbers. 
 
 Edited by . Hershey Sneatk, Ph.D. 
 
 DESCARTES by PKOF. H. A. P. TORREY of the 
 
 University of Vermont.* 
 SPINOZA by PROF. GEO. S. FULLERTON of the 
 
 University of Pennsylvania.* 
 LOCKE by PROF. JOHN E. RUSSELL of Williams 
 
 College.* 
 
 HUME by PROF. H. AUSTIN AIKINS of Trinity 
 College, N. C* 
 
 REID by E. HERSHEY SNEATH of Yale Uni- 
 versity.* 
 
 KANT by PROF. JOHN WATSON of Queen's 
 University, Canada.* 
 
 HEGEL by PROF. JOSIAH ROYCE of Harvard 
 University. 
 
 * Those marked with an asterisk are ready. 
 
 HENRY HOLT & CO., PUBLISHERS, 
 
 NEW YORK.
 
 Series of flDooern pbilosopbers 
 
 Edited by E. Hershey Sneath, Ph. D. 
 
 THE 
 
 \PHILOSOPHYOF DESCARTESf 
 
 IN 
 
 EXTRACTS FROM HIS WRITINGS 
 
 SELECTED AND TRANSLA TED 
 BY 
 
 HENRY A. P. TORREY, A. M. 
 
 Marsh Professor of Philosophy in the University of Vermont 
 
 NEW YORK: 
 HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY 
 
 1892
 
 COPYRIGHT, 1892, 
 
 BY 
 
 HENRY HOLT & CO. 
 
 THE MERSHON COMPANY PRESS, 
 RAHWAY, N. J.
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 THE following translations from the philosophical 
 writings of Descartes are made, with one exception, 
 from the French text of Cousin's edition of the col- 
 lected works in eleven volumes. The extracts from 
 the " Principles" are translated from the Latin text 
 of an Elzevir edition of the Opera PJiUosophica, Amst., 
 1677. No selections have been made from the mathe- 
 matical writings, as not coming within the scope of 
 the series. For the same reason, as well as for want 
 of space, the more specifically physical views of Des- 
 cartes are not fully represented. Much, perhaps, will 
 be missed, but, on the other hand, portions of writings 
 which, to the translator's knowledge, have not hither- 
 to appeared in English, have been introduced. It is 
 perhaps unnecessary to add that in making his selec- 
 tions the translator has derived much aid from the 
 great historians of philosophy, particularly, Kuno 
 Fischer, Erdmann, and Ueberweg, and from the recent 
 treatise of Liard. In the revision of certain portions 
 of the work, Professor Veitch's version has been con- 
 sulted with advantage. 
 
 Hi
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................ v 
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS ................................... i 
 
 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES AND ITS INFLUENCE ...... 15 
 
 SELECTIONS FROM DESCARTES' WRITINGS ARRANGED IN 
 PARTS .......................................... 37-345 
 
 Part First. METHOD ............................. 37-104 
 
 The Discourse Upon Method. Parts I, II, III ...... 37 
 
 Rules for the Direction of the Mind ................ 61 
 
 Fart S^wa'. METAPHYSICS. . . .................... 107-204 
 
 Meditations on the First Philosophy ................ 107 
 
 Principles of Philosophy, Part I ......... .......... 191 
 
 Part Third. PHYSICS ............................. 207-272 
 
 The World, or Essay Upon Light ................... 207 
 
 Part Fourth. PHYSIOLOGY ......................... 275-287 
 
 The Tract on Man .............................. 275 
 
 Automatism of Brutes ............................ 281 
 
 Pa >-t Fifth. PSYCHOLOGY ......................... 291-326 
 
 The Passions of the Soul ......................... , 291 
 
 Part Sixth .ETHICS .............................. 329-345 
 
 On the Happy Life .............................. 329 
 
 On the Summum Bonum .......................... 342 
 
 INDEX ............................................... 347
 
 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
 
 I. Works of Descartes published during his lifetime. 
 
 1. ssais philosophiques, which consisted of Dis- 
 cours de la Methode pour bien c.onduire sa raison, et 
 chercherla verite dans les sciences; plus la Dioptrique, 
 les MMores, et la Geometric, qui sont des essais de 
 cette Methode. Leyde, 1637. Published anonymously. 
 
 R. Cartesii Specimina Philosophies sive dissertatio de 
 methodo recte regendse rationis, Dioptrice et meteora 
 ex gallico latine versa (par Etienne de Courcelles) et 
 ab autero emendata. Amst., Elzev., 1644. 
 
 Geometria a R. Descartes, gallice edita, cum notis 
 Florim. de Beaune, latine versa et commentariis illus- 
 trata a Fr. a Schooten. Lugd. Bat. J. Maire, 1649. 
 
 2. Renati Descartes Meditationes de prima philoso- 
 phia, ubi de Dei existentia et animae immortalitate ; 
 his adjunctae sunt variae objectiones doctorum vi- 
 rorum in istas de Deo et anima demonstrationes, cum 
 responsionibus auctoris. Paris, 1641. 
 
 Second edition of the same, with changed title and 
 Bourdin's objections with replies added, published 
 under the author's superintendence. Amst., Elzev., 
 1642. 
 
 French version of Meditationes by the Due de 
 Luynes; of the Objectiones et Responsiones'by Clerselier; 
 the whole revised by the author. Paris, 1647. 
 
 3. Renati Descartes Principia Philosophic. Amst., 
 Elzev., 1644. 
 
 Principes de la Philosophic ecrits en latin par Rene* 
 Descartes, et traduits en francais par un de ses amis 
 [the Abbe Picot]. Paris, 1647. 
 
 4. Epistola Renati Descartes ad celeberrimum virum 
 Gisbertum Voetium, in quaexaminantur duolibri nuper 
 pro Voe'tio Ultrajecti simul editi : unus de confrater-
 
 Vlll BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
 
 nitate Mariana, alter de philosophia Cartesiana. Amst., 
 Elzev., 1643. 
 
 5. ft. Descartes nota in programma quoddam sub 
 finem anni 1647 in Belgio editum cum hoc titulo : ex- 
 plicatio mentis humanse sive animae rationalis, ubi 
 explicatur, quid sit et quid esse possit. Amst., Elzev., 
 1648. These "note" appear in the " Lettres," 
 CEuvres (Cousin), t. 10, p. 70. A Monsieur .... 
 [Regius] Remarques de Rene* Descartes surun certain 
 placard imprime" aux Pays-Bas vers la fin de I'anne'e 
 
 1647. 
 
 6. Les passions de rdme. Amst., Elzev., 1650. 
 
 II. Posthumous works. 
 
 1. Edited by Clerselier. 
 
 1. Le monde, ou traite de la lumiere. Paris, 
 1677. (First published [not by Clerselier] 
 in 1664.) 
 
 2. Traite defhomme. Paris, 1646. De la for- 
 mation du foetus, published in connection with 
 the preceding. 
 
 3. Les lettres de Rene Descartes, 3 vols. Paris, 
 1657-1667. 
 
 2. Not edited by Clerselier. 
 
 1. Opera postuma Cartesii, Amst., 1701, con- 
 taining, with others, two works published for 
 the first time, viz.: Regnlce ad directionem 
 ingenii. {Regies pour la direction de I' esprit, 
 CEuvres [Cousin ed.] t. u, pp. 201-329), 
 and Inquisitio veritatis per lumen naturale 
 (Recherche de la verite par les lumieres 
 naturelles, CEuvres [Cousin], t. u, pp. 333- 
 376). 
 
 2. Compendium musica, Utrecht, 1650. 
 
 3. Traite 1 de la m/canique compost par M. Des- 
 cartes, de plus 1'abre'ge' de la musique du 
 
 meme auteur, mis en francais N. 
 
 Poisson, Paris, 1668. 
 
 III. Collected works. 
 
 i. Opera philosophica. Elzevir, Amst., 1644 (Editio 
 tertia, 1656), 1670, 1672, 1674, 1677.
 
 BIBLIOGRAPHY. IX 
 
 2. Opera omnia, ist ed. 8 vols. 1670-83. ad ed. 9 
 vols. 1692-1701 and 1713. Elzevir, Amst. See 
 Brunei. 
 
 3. Opera omnia. Frankfort, 7 vols. in 410, 1697. 
 See Bouillier, t. i, p. 36. 
 
 4. CEuvres de Descartes, Paris, 1724, 13 vols. in 
 i2mo. " Fort incomplete." Bouillier. 
 
 5. CEuvres de Descartes, publie"es par Victor Cousin, 
 ii vols. in 8vo. Paris, 1824-26. (The most nearly 
 complete edition.) 
 
 6. CEuvres philosophiques, Gamier, 4 vols. in 8vo. 
 Paris, 1835. 
 
 7. CEuvres inedites de Descartes. Foucher de Careil, 
 Paris, 1859-60. 
 
 8. CEuvres de Descartes, nouvelle Edition prece'de'e 
 d'une introduction par Jules Simon. Paris, 1868. 
 
 [The above titles have been collected mainly from 
 the bibliographical notices of Kuno Fischer (Descartes 
 and his School, p. 298, trans.) ; Ueberweg (Hist, of 
 Philos., Vol. ii, p. 42, trans.); Bouillier (Hist, de la 
 Philos. Carte"sienne, t. i, p. 36), and Brunet (Manuel du 
 Libraire). 
 
 For an interesting account of the lost writings see 
 Kuno Fischer, Descartes, p. 300.] 
 
 WORKS RELATING TO DESCARTES. 
 
 1. Renati Descartes Principia Philosophica more 
 geometrico demonstrata per Benedictum de Spinoza. 
 Amst. 1663. 
 
 This volume contained as an appendix his Cogitata 
 Metaphysica, the earliest published work of Spinoza. 
 
 2. Censura philosophies Cartesiance, Paris, 1689, 
 and Nouveaux Mtmoires pour servir a I'histoire du 
 Carttsianisme, Paris, 1692, both by (Bishop) Daniel 
 Huet. 
 
 3. Voyage du Monde de Descartes, par P. G. Daniel. 
 Paris, 1691. 
 
 The same, Iter per Mundtim Cartesii. Amst, 1694. 
 Containing also, Novae Difficultates a Peripateticopro- 
 positx, etc.
 
 X BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
 
 4. Dictionnaire historique et critique, Pierre Bayle. 
 1695-97, 1702, 2 vols. 1740, 4 vols. Engl. trans. 
 London, 1736. 
 
 5. Le Carte"sianisme, ou la veritable renovation des 
 sciences. Bordas-Demoulin. Paris, 1843. 
 
 6. Fragments de Philosophic Cartesienne: Fragments 
 dePhilosophieModerne, par V. Cousin. Paris, 1852 and 
 
 1854. 
 
 7. Histoire de la Philosophic Carte"sienne, par F.Bouil- 
 lier. 2 vols., Paris, 1854. (The principal authority on 
 the subject.) 
 
 8. Descartes, ses Pre'curseurs et ses Disciples, par 
 E. Saisset. Paris, 1865. 
 
 9. Descartes, par L. Liard. Paris, 1882. (A re- 
 markably fresh and interesting presentation of the 
 speculations of Descartes in the light of contempo- 
 rary science and philosophy.) 
 
 10. Descartes (in Blackwood's Philosophical Clas- 
 sics), by J. P. Mahaffy. Edin. and Phila., 1881. 
 
 11. Commentaire sur les Meditations de Descartes, 
 Par Maine de Biran (Found in Bertrand's Science et 
 Psycologie : nouvelles ceuvres intdites de De Biran. 
 Paris, 1887). See Mind, vol. 12, p. 625. 
 
 12. 77/i? Fundamental Doctrines of Descartes. By 
 H. Sedgwick (in Mind, vol. 7, pp. 435, seq.) 
 
 13. The Method, Meditations and Selections from the 
 Principles of Descartes, translated from the original 
 texts, with introductory essay, historical and critical, 
 by J. Veitch. Edin. and Lond. (ist ed. 1850-52), 
 Tenth edition, 1890. 
 
 (" The extracts from the Principles correspond to 
 what is found in the edition of Gamier." Two earlier, 
 now rare, English versions are mentioned by the 
 author: The Method, Lond., 1649; The Meditations, 
 \V. Molyneux, Lond., 1680. See preface.) 
 
 14. A translation of the Meditations appeared in 
 the Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 4, 1870, 
 and of the introduction to the Meditations, in the 
 same Journal, vol. 5, April, 1871, both by Wm. R. 
 Walker. 
 
 Among the historians of philosophy who have
 
 BIBLIOGRAPHY. Xt 
 
 treated of Descartes at length should be mentioned 
 especially : 
 
 Kuno Fischer : Geschichte der neuern Philosophic. 
 Mannheim, 1854, seq. New editions of the earlier 
 volumes have since appeared. The third and revised 
 edition of the first volume, containing Descartes, 
 has recently been translated into English by J. P. 
 Gordy, Ph. D., under the title, History of Modern 
 Philosophy, by Kuno Fischer, Descartes and his 
 school. New York, 1887. Kuno Fischer also has trans- 
 lated into German the principal philosophical works 
 of Descartes. Mannheim, 1863. 
 
 Titles of numerous essays on Descartes, mostly 
 German, maybe found in Ueberweg's full bibliography 
 (Hist, of Philos., vol. ii, p. 43, trans.). In addition 
 may be mentioned the following recent mono- 
 graphs : 
 
 P. J. Schmid : Die Prinzipien der menschlichen 
 Erkenntniss nach Descartes. (Promotionsschrift), 
 Leipzig. 
 
 Hartmann: Die Lehredes Cartcsius De Passionibus 
 Animce nnd des Spinoza De Affectibus Humanis darge- 
 stellt und verglichen. W. Ohlan, 1878. 
 
 B. Gutzeit: Descartes' angeborene Ideen verglichen 
 mit Kant's Anschamuigs-und-Denkformen a priori. 
 Bromberg, 1883. 
 
 B. Trognitz : Die mathematische Methode in Des- 
 cartes' philosophischem Systeme. Saalfeld, 1887. 
 
 P. Plessner : Die LeJire von den Leidenschaften bei 
 Descartes. (Inaugural Dissertation.) Leipzig, 1888. 
 
 Wm. Wallace : Article on Descartes in the Encyclo- 
 pedia Britannica. Ninth edition. 
 
 Neuf lettres ine'dites a Mersenne. See notice in 
 Mind, Oct. 1891 (vol. 16, p. 555). 
 
 WORKS ON THE LIFE OF DESCARTES. 
 
 Descartes : Discours sur la Methode. 
 A. Baillet: La vie de Mr. des Cartes. Paris, 1691, 
 abridged, 1693. 
 
 Thomas: Eloge de Rene Descartes. Paris, 1765 (Dis-
 
 XU BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
 
 cours qui a remporte le prix de I' Academic francaise 
 en 1765). Especially the Notes to the above. 
 
 J. Millet : Histoirt de Descartes avant 1637 (Paris, 
 1867), depuis 1637 (Paris, 1870). 
 
 Kuno Fischer: Hist, of Mod. Philos., Descartes and 
 his school (trans.), pp. 165-297. 
 
 J. P. Mahaffy: Descartes, pp. 7-143. 
 
 C. G. J. Jacobi : Ueber Descartes' Leben. Berlin, 
 1846.
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS. 
 
 RENE DESCARTES (De Quartis)* was born March 
 30, 1596, at La Haye, in the province of Tou- 
 raine. His father, Joachim Descartes, was a coun- 
 cilor of the parliament of Bretagne. His mother, 
 Jeanne Brochard, was the daughter of a lieu- 
 tenant-general of Poitiers. She was of a delicate 
 constitution, and transmitted to Rene, her third and 
 last child, the germs of consumption, of which disease 
 she died a few days after his birth. Like Newton, 
 the feeble boy seemed destined to an early grave, 
 but careful nursing saved him. The wise father 
 would not suffer the eager mind in the frail body to 
 be overtaxed. Allowed to carry on his studies, but 
 only as play, the reflective turn of the boy's mind 
 asserted itself in constant inquiries into the causes 
 of things, and before he was eight years old his 
 father began to call him his " little philosopher." 
 In 1604 Rene was sent to the college of La Fleche, 
 in Anjou, recently established by Henry IV. in the 
 royal palace, under the care of the Jesuits, and 
 designed to be the foremost school for the education 
 of the nobility. The impression made upon the young 
 mind of the philosopher by the studies there pursued 
 is vividly conveyed in his own words in his Discourse 
 on Method. He finished his course at La Fleche in 
 
 * Thomas, Notes sur FEloge. (Euvres de Descartes (Cousin), t. 
 i, p. 81.
 
 2 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 1612, when he was sixteen years of age. Among his 
 schoolmates one, eight years older than himself, Marin 
 Mersenne, was destined to be his lifelong friend. 
 The point of chief interest is this : the mind which 
 was to lay the foundation for modern philosophy there 
 became interested, not in learning merely, but in 
 knowledge, in the nature of knowledge itself, and in 
 what can be clearly and distinctly known, as dis- 
 tinguished from what is obscure and confused. Hence 
 the fascination of mathematics. 
 
 In the year 1613 his father sent young Rene to 
 Paris to see life. For two years he spent most of his 
 time in amusements, then for two years more shut 
 himself up in seclusion and pursued his studies. At 
 last, weary of the city and convinced that he would 
 learn more by mingling with the world at large, in 
 1617, at the age of twenty-one, he enlisted as a volun- 
 teer in the army of the Netherlands. He joined the 
 garrison in Breda, under the Prince Maurice of Nas- 
 sau. During two years' stay there, while an armistice 
 prevailed, he found leisure to cultivate mathematics, 
 and made the acquaintance of a celebrated mathema- 
 tician, Beeckman, for whom he wrote his Compen- 
 dium Musicce, the earliest of his works now extant. 
 From the army of the Netherlands he went to Bavaria 
 and enlisted in the service of Maximilian at the begin- 
 ning of the Thirty Years' War, and afterward in that 
 of the Emperor Ferdinand II. He took part in sev- 
 eral campaigns in Bohemia and Hungary, but finally 
 quitted the service and ended his military life soon 
 after the battle of Neuhasel, in July, 1621. He was 
 then twenty-five years of age. Intervals of peace 
 favored the philosopher during his career as a soldier. 
 Diplomatic negotiations interrupted the movements
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS. 3 
 
 of the Bavarian army, they went into winter quar- 
 ters, and Descartes was stationed at Neuburg, on the 
 Danube, during the winter of 1619-20. During that 
 period, left undisturbed to his reflections, he made a 
 memorable discovery.* It produced so profound an 
 impression upon his mind that he put down in his diary 
 the exact date. " On the tenth of November I began 
 to make a wonderful discovery. "f It was probably 
 " his first glimpse of the principles of the fundamental 
 science, or mathesis universalis" \ to the development 
 of which he thereafter devoted his life. He saw the 
 possibility of solving geometrical problems by algebra, 
 and laid the foundations of analytical geometry. But 
 the inventum mirabile meant for Descartes a great 
 deal more than this. He thought he had discovered 
 the key to unlock all the mysteries of nature. He 
 thought that by considering all physical change as 
 matter in motion he could subject the whole realm of 
 nature to mathematical demonstration. But his 
 thought went even further than this. He conceived 
 mathematical knowledge as the type of all knowledge. 
 Its criterion of certainty, clear and distinct intuition, 
 its analytical method, he would apply to the cogni- 
 
 * See Discourse on Method, part ii . 
 
 f " Intelligere coepi fundamentum invent! mirabilis." Kuno 
 Fischer's Descartes, trans., p. 194. 
 
 \ Erdmann, Hist, of Philos. Modern, trans., p. 9. 
 
 " In the words of his epitaph, written by his intimate friend 
 Chanut, with whom he had often talked over his mental history : 
 ' In his winter furlough, comparing the mysteries of nature with 
 the laws of mathematics, he dared to hope that the secrets of both 
 could be unlocked by the same key.' In otiis hibernis Naturrc 
 mysteria componens cum legibus Matheseos, utriusque arcana 
 eadem clave reserari posse ausus est sperare." Mahaffy's Des- 
 cartes, p. 27.
 
 4 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 tion of every branch of human inquiry. He would 
 thus lay new foundations for philosophy. After quit- 
 ting the army Descartes spent the next five years 
 mostly in travel, then for three years he lived in se- 
 clusion in the suburbs of Paris. It was probably dur- 
 ing these years that he wrote out the first sketch of 
 his doctrine of method, The Rules for the Direction 
 of the Mind {Regula ad Directionem Ingenii). 
 
 In 1629, at the age of thirty-three, the philosopher 
 sought and found a country and a mode of life most 
 favorable to the prosecution of his design.* Acting 
 upon the maxim, Bene vixit, bene qui latuit, he went 
 secretly to Holland, where in a favorable climate he 
 enjoyed during twenty years the desired seclusion, 
 and there produced that series of remarkable works 
 which gave a new direction to speculative thought 
 and laid the basis of modern philosophy. 
 
 The philosophical works of Descartes appeared in 
 the following order. The Discourse upon Method was 
 the first. It was published anonymously at Leyden, 
 June 8, 1637, in connection with the Dioptric, the Me- 
 teors, and the Geometry. The volume was entitled : 
 " Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the 
 Reason, and Seeking Truth in the Sciences, also the 
 Dioptric, the Meteors, and the Geometry, which are 
 essays in this Method." The whole work was known 
 also as " The Philosophical Essays." " Written," 
 says Mahaffy,f <l in the popular tongue of Europe, and 
 with a clearness and simplicity rarely equaled even in 
 
 * " I desire quiet. I have guided my life thus far according to 
 the motto Bene vixit, bene qui latuit, and I intend to continue to 
 do so." Letter to Mersenne, January 10, 1634, (Euvres, t. vi, p. 
 
 243- 
 
 f Descartes, p. 70.
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS. 5 
 
 French prose the best prose in modern Europe it 
 [the Discourse of Method] produced an electric shock 
 throughout the learned world, which no other work 
 of the kind ever did in the history of philosophy." 
 Descartes himself thus justifies his use of his native 
 tongue rather than Latin, the tongue of the learned, 
 as a vehicle for his scientific thought. " And if I 
 write in French, which is my vernacular, rather than in 
 Latin, the language of my teachers, the reason is that 
 I believe that those who make use of their simple 
 natural reason will be better judges of my opinions 
 than those who believe only in the ancient books ; 
 and as for those who combine good sense with learn- 
 ing, whom alone I desire for my judges, they will not, 
 I am sure, be so partial to the Latin as to refuse to 
 attend to my arguments because I present them in 
 the vulgar tongue." * 
 
 In explanation of the title of the work, Descartes, 
 writing to his friend Mersenne, says, " I do not call 
 it Treatise upon method, but Discourse upon method, 
 which is the same as Preface or Announcement of the 
 method, to show that I have no intention of unfolding 
 it, but only of talking about it ; for, as may be seen 
 from what I say of it, it consists rather in practice than 
 in theory ; and I call the treatises which follow essays 
 in this method, because I contend that the things they 
 contain could not have been discovered without it, 
 and one may learn from them the value of it. As also 
 I have inserted in the first discourse something in 
 metaphysics, in physics, and in medicine, to show that 
 it applies to all sorts of matters." f In a letter to a 
 friend of Mersenne, he says further, " I think I have 
 
 * Discours de la Mtthode, p. 6, ad fin. (Ettvres, t. i, p. 210. 
 t Let (res, CEuvres, t. vi, p. 138.
 
 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 shown that I employ a method by which I might ex- 
 plain equally well any other matter, provided I could 
 make the necessary experiments and had the time to 
 consider them."* Regarding the Method of Des- 
 cartes, Saisset has very well said : " It ought not to be 
 forgotten that in publishing the Method, Descartes 
 joined to it, as a supplement, the Dioptrics, the Geom- 
 etry, and the Meteors. Thus at one stroke he founded, 
 on the basis of a new method, two sciences hitherto 
 almost unknown and of infinite importance Mathe- 
 matical Physics and the application of Algebra to Ge- 
 ometry ; and at the same time he gave the prelude 
 to the Meditations and the Principles that is to say, 
 to an original Metaphysic, and the mechanical theory 
 of the universe." f 
 
 Next appeared, in 1641, his most important work, 
 the Meditations. It was published first at Paris with 
 the title, " Meditationes de prima philosophia, ubi de Dei 
 existentia et animcz immortalitate" A second edition 
 was published in Amsterdam by Elzevir in 1642, with 
 the title somewhat changed, " Meditationes de prima 
 philosophia, in quibus Dei existentia ct ammo, humancs 
 a corpore distinctio demonstrantur." J The Medita- 
 tions are six in number, with the following titles : The 
 First ; of the Things which may be Doubted. The 
 Second ; of the Nature of the Human Mind ; and that 
 it is more easily known than the Body. The Third ; 
 of God ; that He exists. The Fourth ; of Truth and 
 Error. The Fifth ; of the Essence of Material 
 Things, and, for the second time, of the Existence 
 of God. The Sixth; of the Existence of Material 
 
 * Lettres, (Euvres, t. vi, p. 306. 
 f Veitch, Descartes, Introd., p. xii. 
 \. See K. Fischer, Descartes, p. 247.
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS. 7 
 
 Things, and of the Real Distinction between the 
 Soul and the Body of Man. In a somewhat unique 
 way the writer endeavored to forestall criticism. Be- 
 fore the work was printed, he sent copies of it 
 in manuscript, through Mersenne and other friends, to 
 several of the most learned men of the time, soliciting 
 their objections. Seven sets of objections were thus 
 collected, to all of which Descartes made elaborate re- 
 plies. These objections, with the replies, were added 
 to the work, which was then published. The first set 
 of objections were those offered by a certain Caterus, 
 a Catholic theologian of Louvain, and relate principally 
 to the proof of the Divine existence ; the second and 
 sixth are reports of objections collected by Mersenne 
 from various persons, and concern the question of the 
 immortality of the soul and the logical defects in the 
 arguments ; the third are from the English philosopher 
 Thomas Hobbes, who objects, among other things, to 
 clear conception being made the test of truth ; the 
 fourth were those of Antoine Arnauld, the celebrated 
 Jansenistof Port Royal, who questions Descartes' orig- 
 inality in respect to his Cogito, ergo sum, finds the dis- 
 tinction between soul and body too sharply drawn, 
 detects a logical circle in the attempt to prove the 
 divine existence by the clearness of the idea of God, 
 and the reality of what we clearly conceive by 
 the Divine veracity, and also finds difficulty in har- 
 monizing Descartes' view of substance and accident 
 with the doctrine of Transubstantiation. The fifth 
 set of objections were those of the French philosopher, 
 Pierre Gassendi, who, from a materialistic point of view 
 attacked the idealism of the new philosophy. To 
 these six series of objections, published with Des- 
 cartes' replies in the first edition of the Meditations,
 
 8 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 there were added, in the second edition, those 
 of the Jesuit Father Bourdin, a scholastic theologian 
 who sought to overthrow the new doctrine by attack- 
 ing the method itself ; of greater importance were the 
 criticisms of the writer who styles himself Hype rasp is- 
 tes, and of Henry More, the Cambridge Platonist, 
 whose objections were not embodied in the work, but 
 were published, with Descartes' replies, among his let- 
 ters of the years 1640 and 1648.* 
 
 The Meditations, originally written in Latin, were 
 translated into French by the Due de Luynes, and 
 the seven sets of objections and replies by Clerselier. 
 Descartes revised the translations and changed some 
 passages in the Latin text.f The French version 
 was published in Paris, 1647. 
 
 The important treatise, The Principles of Philos- 
 ophy, followed. It was written in Latin. The first 
 edition, bearing the title, Renati Descartes \ principia 
 philosophic, was printed by the Elzevirs in Amster- 
 dam, 1644. The treatise has four parts : Part I, Of 
 the Principles of Human Knowledge. Part II, Of the 
 Principles of Material Things. Part III, Of the Visi- 
 ble World. Part IV, Of the Earth. The first part is 
 a repetition, with slight additions, of the thoughts con- 
 tained in the Meditations. The manner of the whole 
 work is dry and scholastic, as compared with the free 
 and flowing style of his other writings, but it was in- 
 tended to present in a more exact form a complete 
 summary of his system. 
 
 * (Euvres, t. viii, p. 242, t. x, p. 178. 
 
 f See K. Fischer, Descartes, p. 299. Professor Veitch has 
 collated the French in his translation, which is from the Latin 
 text. 
 
 \ He objected to the Latinizing of his name.
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS. 9 
 
 The remaining parts contain the substance of his 
 suppressed treatise, De Mundo (Le Monde, on TraitJ 
 de la Lumtire}. A French version was made by one 
 of Descartes' friends, the Abbe Picot. It was ap- 
 proved by the author, who says of it in a letter to the 
 Abbe", which is printed as a preface to the work : 
 " The version of my Principles which you have taken 
 the trouble to make is so elegant and so finished that 
 I am led to hope it will be read by more people in 
 French than in Latin, and that it will be better under- 
 stood."* 
 
 The last work of Descartes, published in the life- 
 time of the author, was the Treatise on the Passions 
 (Traiit des Passions de I'Ame). It was written in 
 French, for the Princess Elizabeth of the Palatinate, 
 in 1646, but not finished until 1649. At the solicita- 
 tions of his friends the treatise was published the fol- 
 lowing year, by the Elzevirs, at Amsterdam, by whom 
 also a Latin version was brought out shortly after 
 the author's death. The scope of the treatise is 
 indicated in these words: "My design has not been 
 to expound the passions as a preacher, nor even as a 
 moral philosopher, but solely as a natural philosopher 
 (en physiden),"\ He seeks to exhibit the passions as 
 due to the union of body and soul and as mental phe- 
 nomena resulting from the motions of the animal 
 spirits. 
 
 The motto, Bene vixit, bene qul latuit, which Des- 
 cartes had adopted for his life, whether dictated by 
 prudence or timidity, or both, is characteristic of the 
 man. He lived at a time when it was dangerous to 
 
 * (Euvrts, t. iii, p. 9. 
 
 f Re'ponst a la Se'conde Letter, Les Passions. (Eitvres, t. iv, p. 
 34-
 
 10 THE PHILOSOPHY OP DESCARTES. 
 
 express new truth openly. He had to encounter, or 
 evade, the opposition of theologians, both Catholic 
 and Protestant. He chose, when it was possible, to 
 avoid a quarrel. He stood in fear of the Inquisition. 
 With the fate of Galileo before his eyes, he suppressed 
 his treatise De Mttndo. He thought it necessary to 
 do this, even although in that treatise he had presented 
 his views as a mere hypothesis of what would happen 
 in an imaginary world. 
 
 " But because I have endeavored to explain my 
 principal discoveries in a treatise which certain 
 considerations prevent me from publishing, 1 can- 
 not make them understood better than by giving 
 
 here a summary of its contents I designed 
 
 to comprehend in it all that I thought I knew, 
 before writing it, concerning the nature of material 
 things. But just as painters do, who cannot represent 
 on a flat surface equally well all the aspects of a solid 
 body, and therefore choose one of the more important, 
 which they set in full light, and the rest in shadow, so 
 I, fearing I could not get into my essay all I had in 
 my mind, undertook merely to set forth quite fully 
 what I thought about light ; then, as occasion was pre- 
 sented, to add something about the sun and the fixed 
 stars, because light proceeds almost wholly from them ; 
 of the heavens, because they transmit it ; of the 
 planets, the comets, and the earth, because they reflect 
 it ; and, in particular, of all bodies which are upon the 
 earth, because they are either colored or transparent 
 or luminous ; and, finally, of man, because he is the 
 spectator of all. 
 
 " But, in order to put all these things a little into the 
 shade, and to be able to say more freely what I thought
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS. II 
 
 about them, without being obliged either to accept or 
 to reject the opinion received among the learned, I 
 resolved to leave this whole present world to their dis- 
 putes, and to talk only of what might happen in a new 
 one, if God should create, somewhere in imaginary 
 space, enough matter to compose it, and should set 
 in motion in various ways and without order the 
 different parts of this matter, so that it should form 
 a chaos as confused as ever poets could feign, and 
 thereafter affording it no more than his ordinary assist- 
 ance to nature, leave it to act according to the laws 
 which he has established." * 
 
 But the philosopher soon discovered that to present 
 his views even under the guise of a mere hypothesis 
 would not afford him sufficient shelter. The doctrine 
 of the earth's motion, a necessary part of his theory, 
 was not tolerated at Rome, even as an hypothesis. 
 The sentence of condemnation against Galileo, who 
 defended the Copernican theory, contained these 
 words : " quamvis hypothetice a se illam proponi simu- 
 laret." Writing to his friend Mersenne in November, 
 1633, Descartes says : "I have just been inquiring at 
 Leyden and at Amsterdam whether Galileo's System 
 of the World was not there, for it seemed to me I had 
 heard that it had been printed in Italy the past year. 
 They told me that it was true that it had been printed, 
 but that all the copies of it were immediately burned 
 at Rome, and that he had been sentenced to do 
 penance ; which made so deep an impression upon me 
 that I almost resolved to burn all my papers, or at 
 
 least to let no one see them And I confess 
 
 that if it [the theory of the earth's motion] is false, 
 all the principles of my philosophy are also false, for 
 
 * Discours. pt. v. (Euvres, t. i, p. 168.
 
 12 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 it is clearly demonstrated by them, and it is so 
 bound up with every part of my treatise that I could 
 not detach it from them without making the rest 
 defective. But as I would not for all the world 
 there should go forth from me an essay wherein 
 there should be found the least 'word which would 
 be disapproved by the Church, I prefer to suppress 
 it rather than let it appear in a mutilated condition." * 
 Probably only a fragment of the whole work ever 
 saw the light. This was published by Clerselier 
 in correct form, in 1677, entitled, Le Monde, ou Traitt 
 de la Lumtire. 
 
 But our philosopher was not destined to end his 
 days in Holland. The latter part of his life there was 
 greatly embittered by controversy, particularly with 
 a Protestant theologian, Voe't, who had become rector 
 of the University of Utrecht, and who had accused 
 Descartes of atheism. In a letter to his friend 
 Chanut, November r, 1646, he complains : "A father 
 (Bourdin) thought he had sufficient ground for ac- 
 cusing me of being a skeptic, because I have refuted 
 the skeptics, and a clergyman (Voetius) has under- 
 taken to make out that I am an atheist, alleging no 
 other reason except that I have tried to prove the 
 existence of God." f After four years of persistent 
 attack upon the new philosophy, Voe't secured a judg- 
 ment of condemnation on the part of the University, 
 and finally, the matter going the length of libel, the 
 magistrates of Utrecht took it up and settled it by 
 prohibiting publications for or against Descartes. In 
 the University of Leyden, also, a kind of interdict was 
 placed on the writings of the philosopher. Annoyed 
 
 * CEuvres, t. vi, p. 238. 
 f (Euvres, t. ix, p. 416.
 
 LIFE AND WRITINGS. 13 
 
 and disturbed by frequent and unreasonable opposi- 
 tion, he thought Holland no longer safe, and made up 
 his mind to return to his own country. Not long 
 after he received from the Queen of Sweden an in- 
 vitation to visit Stockholm. Queen Christina had 
 become interested in the philosophy of Descartes, 
 through his personal friend Chanut, who was then 
 French ambassador at the court of Sweden. The 
 queen desired to meet the philosopher and to hear 
 from his own lips an exposition of his system. Ac- 
 cordingly, though greatly dreading the long journey, 
 the strange country, and the severe winter, he set out 
 for Stockholm, where he arrived early in October, 
 1649, and took up his lodgings under the friendly 
 roof of Chanut, and in November began to instruct 
 the queen in philosophy. But the requirements of 
 royalty did not suit the habits of the philosopher. 
 Since the early days at the college of La Fleche, Des- 
 cartes had been accustomed to lie in bed until the 
 middle of the forenoon. The practice, at first per- 
 mitted to favor a feeble child, was kept up in after 
 years, because conducive to undisturbed reflection. 
 It was most convenient, however, to his royal pupil to 
 meet her instructor when her mind was freshest and 
 when no cares of state would interrupt her lesson. 
 Accordingly Descartes was obliged to go to the pal- 
 ace every morning at five o'clock. The winter was un- 
 usually severe, and the frail constitution of the phi- 
 losopher succumbed to it. He died of inflammation 
 of the lungs, February n, 1650, before he had com- 
 pleted his fifty-fourth year. The queen, in her grief, 
 would have buried him among kings and raised a 
 mausoleum for him. But Chanut prevailed on her to 
 allow the remains to be placed in the Catholic ceme-
 
 14 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 tery with simple rites. " A priest, some torches, and 
 four persons of distinction who stood at the head and 
 foot of the coffin such was the funeral of Descartes. 
 M. de Chanut, in honor of the memory of his friend 
 and of a great man, raised over his grave a square pyra- 
 mid with inscriptions. Holland, where he had been 
 persecuted during his life, caused a medal to be struck 
 in his honor when he was dead. Sixteen years after 
 that is to say in 1666 his remains were transported 
 to France, and deposited in the church of Ste. Gene- 
 vieve. On the 24th of June, 1667, a solemn service 
 was performed for him with the greatest magnificence. 
 After the service a funeral oration was to have been 
 delivered, but there came an express order from the 
 court forbidding it."* His name had stood for some 
 years upon the Index. 
 
 * Thomas, Notes sur l'loge. (Euvres, t. i, p. 116.
 
 -THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES 
 AND ITS INFLUENCE. 
 
 THE thinking of Descartes, by general consent, 
 marks the beginning of modern speculative philosophy. 
 If originality be a test of intellectual greatness, there 
 are but few thinkers in ancient or modern times who 
 can be placed alongside of this remarkable man. The 
 seclusion in which Descartes sought steadfastly to 
 spend his days was merely intended to promote the 
 deeper seclusion of his intellectual life. He desired a 
 first free look at the world, without and within, unin- 
 fluenced by the present, untrammeled by the past. 
 Of course it was a vain desire. From the past came 
 down to him the problems which still awaited solution, 
 and the particular form in which they presented them- 
 selves was determined by the times in which he lived. 
 The very discipline in the course of which he became 
 aware of them, and by which his mind was prepared to 
 deal with them, precluded a purely individual result, 
 nor would such a result, if attainable, have been of 
 great value. Pure, absolute originality in thought is 
 no more possible than abstract individuality of exist- 
 ence. What Descartes says of himself was therefore 
 not quite true, that had his father given him no educa- 
 tion, he should have written the same works, only he 
 should have written all in French. It is safe to say 
 that, but for that scholastic training, he would have 
 written nothing of account, and his name would not
 
 l6 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 have survived the century in which he lived. For the 
 studies which absorbed his eager mind at the college 
 of La Fleche brought to his attention the deepest prob- 
 lems of existence and determined him to that lonely 
 career the single object of which was to solve them. 
 And with such originality and independence as is 
 compatible with that organic connection with other 
 minds, whereby the thought of all becomes the thought 
 of each, the solitary thinker addressed himself to his 
 task, and the sustained effort of more than twenty 
 years, with scarcely a break, marks the strength of the 
 original impulse. Much of his thinking, after two 
 centuries and a half of scientific progress, has now be- 
 come obsolete ; much still remains an imperishable 
 addition to the sum of human philosophy. 
 
 Let us attempt a somewhat free reproduction of his 
 thought. In the endeavor to arrive at a true conception 
 of the philosophical system of Descartes, the fact of his 
 early predilection for mathematics must not be over- 
 looked. The influence of those youthful studies, in a 
 branch of knowledge to which he was himself destined 
 to make a very important addition, survived through 
 all, and determined his whole intellectual scheme. 
 " Chiefly I loved the mathematics ; I was surprised that 
 upon foundations so solid and stable no loftier structure 
 had been raised." The necessary sequence of intui- 
 tions in the demonstrations of geometry, wherein the 
 mind, starting from the simplest truths, arrives by such 
 successive intuitions at the knowledge of all that can be 
 known of the relations of figures in space, presented 
 itself to the mind of Descartes as the type of all 
 human knowledge whatever. He looked upon knowl- 
 edge as one interconnected whole, each special science 
 being a member of it, so related to all the rest that it
 
 DESCARTES' PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 17 
 
 is easier to learn all than to learn any one detached 
 from the whole. Hence is suggested a sort of uni- 
 versal mathematics, or mathesis, which is Descartes' 
 Novum Organ um. This view of the nature of the ob- 
 ject and the process of human cognition is fully un- 
 folded in the early and little known " Rules for the 
 Direction of the Mind," a treatise of much greater im- 
 portance than the Discourse on Method for the right 
 comprehension of Descartes' theory of knowledge.* 
 The mathematical sciences furnished also a universal 
 rule of certainty. The mind of Descartes sought 
 clearness as the first requisite in all satisfactory think- 
 
 \ ing. Geometry affords clear conceptions. Indeed 
 that only which can be clearly and distinctly conceived 
 
 i is to be admitted as true in the mathematics gener- 
 ally. 
 
 This principle seemed to Descartes worthy to be 
 
 i made the universal rule for thought. " Only that 
 
 i not in mathematics alone, but everywhere which can 
 be clearly and distinctly conceived, is true." (Absence 
 of contradiction is the negative test of clearness, 
 hence the logical law of non-contradiction as the 
 reverse side of the principle.) But the principle it- 
 self, like the science of mathematics, from whence by 
 generalization it was derived, belongs only to the 
 sphere of abstract thought. It affords a criterion of 
 the true, but stands for no concrete reality. Philos- 
 ophy is the science of being ; Descartes, with his 
 mathematical rule of certainty, becomes interested in 
 philosophy. What he finds existing as such does not 
 satisfy him. He cannot " clearly and distinctly con- 
 ceive" it. He therefore rejects it all. He goes 
 further ; on reflection he finds that he has from child- 
 * See extract from Rule II, below, p. 63.
 
 l8 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 hood received into his mind innumerable beliefs 
 which will not stand the proposed test. They are 
 worthless to the thinker, who desires only absolute 
 truths perceived to be such. He will make a clean 
 sweep of them. He will begin his thinking all over 
 again, in the light of the new principle. He will 
 make a clear space and wait to see what will ap- 
 pear. But the space is not clear, nor can it be, for 
 he is himself there in the middle of it awaiting the dis- 
 closure ; but that is precisely what the disclosure is : 
 Je pense, done je suis. Myself the thinker am a 
 reality. My own existence in the act of thinking is as 
 clearly and distinctly known to me as any truth of 
 mathematics can be. This truth is itself a type of 
 certainty. Whatever hereafter, and only that which, 
 is as certainly and distinctly conceived by me as my 
 own being is, shall be admitted as real. Descartes' 
 thinking begins with abstract thought, mathematics ; 
 thence he derives his fundamental rule of certainty ; 
 but in the application of it he arrives at a concrete 
 truth, the being of the individual thinker. He 
 reaches thus a new starting-point, and one of cardinal 
 importance for all succeeding philosophy. Philo- 
 sophical speculation thereafter must turn on the ego, 
 which Descartes thus made the pivot of his own 
 thinking concerning real existence. But the self thus 
 discovered and inexpugnable, undeniably existent, 
 is only myself. Are there possibly other selves, 
 finite like me, an infinite Self also above all ? Des- 
 cartes soon satisfies himself of the necessary existence 
 of the latter, the original Self. But there is a little 
 preliminary parade of skeptical skill. How do I 
 know, after all, that in my clearest thought I am not 
 deceived ; might not some powerful being so control
 
 DESCARTES' PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 19 
 
 ^ my mental process as to make me take the false for 
 true ; well, even then, I should still be thinking, 
 though thinking I was deceived ; and if I was thinking 
 no matter what, I should be existing. But among 
 my_thoughts there is one which cannot have come' 
 from myself the thought of infinite perfection. I 
 am consciously finite, imperfect, yet this thought of 
 infinite perfection is undeniably within me ; according 
 to the principle De nihilo nihil it must have a cause. 
 There is no adequate cause for this thought but the 
 Keing^wHo~Ts^actually infinite in perfection such a 
 Being Then must have put this thought within me. 
 Such a Being must as certainly exist as I myself do, 
 from whom other and finite thoughts proceed. More- 
 over, as Augustine, and AnsHm have argued, the idea 
 of the Infinite Being is proof of the existence^oLsjicJLa 
 Being, for this i3ea~ contains exisience..as_a Jiecessary 
 predicate. Descartes makes use of the common 
 ontological arguments to support his own, while at 
 the same time he contends that his own is entirely 
 distinct. And indeed it is, in one form of it, that 
 where he employs the principle of causality, as above 
 indicated. The effect cannot transcend the cause ; 
 but if God jiid not exist, the presence^of the idea of 
 infinite perfection within a finite consciousness would 
 be inexplicable ; the effect would transcend the 
 cause. But such a Being cannot deceive. To im- 
 agine that he could do so would be to suppose some- 
 thing contradictory. Now the discovery of the 
 divine existence is one of the highest philosophical 
 importance, for it makes indubitable the rule of 
 certainty assumed at the outset, " whatever I clearly 
 and distinctly conceive is true." It cannot be that 
 ~ He who is absolute truth and the source of my being
 
 20 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 should have made me so that in obeying the laws of 
 my mind I should go astray. 
 
 Descartes has, as appears, three distinct principles 
 of certainty ; viz., i. Whatever is clearly and dis- 
 tinctly conceived is true, the type of which is mathe- 
 matical intuition ; 2. Whatever is known as clearly 
 and distinctly as my own being is real ; 3. The 
 Divine veracity. Which of these is fundamental to the 
 other two ? It is difficult to say. Apparently he re- 
 gards the last as the basis of all.* 
 
 In addition, it is to be observed, he employs the log- 
 ical principle of non-contradiction in connection with 
 his first rule, and the real principle of causality, in 
 establishing the being of God. 
 
 Assured of the existence of God as creator and pre- 
 server (and preservation, for him, is continued creation) 
 of his own finite existence, Descartes now inquires 
 whether there may not reasonably be supposed to exist 
 other finite beings like himself, as well as what in 
 general he has hitherto assumed to be an external world. 
 In regard to these he speedily assures himself that he 
 has not been deceived. The way is thus open to 
 determine the inner reality and the laws of the world 
 of nature and of spirit. The objects of our knowledge 
 are things, and their affections, and eternal truths, which 
 latter exist for thought only. Among the eternal 
 verities are to be reckoned the law of causality (ex 
 nihilo //'/), of non-contradiction, and the necessary 
 existence of the thinking self. Of things there are 
 two classes, minds and bodies ; more strictly, thinking 
 substances and extended substances, since thought is 
 the essence of mind, extension, of body. Substance 
 is that which so exists that it needs nothing else for its 
 * See close of Fifth Meditation.
 
 DESCARTES PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 21 
 
 existence. Only one such substance can be conceived, 
 /. <?., God. But in a modified sense we may speak of 
 things created as substances, requiring the aid of God 
 (concur 'sus Dei) for their existence. Each form of 
 substance has its preeminent attribute from which all 
 others, its modes, derive ; viz., from thought, which is 
 the essence of mind, imagination, sensation, will ; from ,. _ 
 extension, which is the essence of body, figure and 
 motion. Extension and thought, body and mind, are 
 mutually opposed and exclusive, each being substance, 
 or essential attribute of different substances. Thought 
 is purely internal, extension is wholly external. There 
 is no community or analogy between them. In man, 
 composed of body and mind, the two opposed sub- 
 stances are united as closely as possible, yet are wholly 
 
 distinct. The whole material world consists only of 
 
 J 
 
 extension and its modes, figure and motion. No atoms 
 exist, nor has the world limits. Matter, as extension, 
 has only the capacity of being formed and moved ; t 
 actual form and motion must come from another 
 source, viz., from the Being who is the ultimate ground ^ 
 of extension. In the beginning God divided matter 
 into innumerable parts of various sizes and forms, and 
 set them moving in all directions, whence at last 
 arose the world. God had his own ends in view in 
 the formation of the world, but it is presumptuous for v ^ 
 the human mind to try to discover them. Final causes 
 are excluded from philosophy.* The whole explanation 
 of the material world is mechanical and mathema- 
 tical. Matter in motion brings about everything. 
 The universe is absolutely full : there is no vacuum ; 
 hence, when once set in motion, the particles move 
 
 * Descartes, however, in his explanation of the body, makes use 
 of the principle of design.
 
 22 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 in a circular manner, each pressing into the place 
 left by another. The vortices thus arising explain 
 the revolution of the planets and the gravitation of 
 bodies to their centers. Light and heat are explained 
 by the vibratory movement of the most subtle form of 
 matter the first element ; besides which are the sec- 
 ond, the element of air, and the third, the element of 
 earth, of which the planets are formed. In the organic 
 world, the mechanical explanation is still retained. 
 Plants and animals are mere machines. The animal 
 >,- soul is the _blood, the circulation of which constitutes 
 life. The blood, filtered by the brain, becomes the 
 animal spirits. Iii man, who is undemably at once 
 body and soul, thejwo opposed substanes^,spirit_and 
 matter, thought and extension, are intimatelyj^oniqined . 
 
 AlTHxpTanatinn of qprh linirm _ig-..frmnH in tUo pn-innl 
 
 gland, or the conariuin, which, being the onl.I?.ajQilhe 
 brain which ^single and. the ....spot where. the animal 
 spirits meet, may h< ?wtnmeH fro hp--fcbfe-&gai- of thfi_ 
 _ soulJj' and its organ of communication with the body.- 
 it as t hgjJghjLjuid, . ejtie_Q5LQ.n ..are^rnutualLy-^xcJiisive 
 in their nature, their connection in the brain must be re- 
 gard e d as"su,peinAtM^UjyMkd^bj_God. Sensations 
 from impressions on the sense organs there exist as per- 
 ceptions, and thence volitions are transmitted through 
 the nerves to the muscles, whence bodily movements 
 arise. The passions are explained as due to ideas 
 strengthened by the action of the animal spirits forcing 
 their way to the heart through the pores of the brain 
 and the rest of the body, the result being a confused 
 but vivid state of feeling. The passions, like the ideas, 
 are theoretical and practical. All are to be deduced 
 from six primary ones, viz., wonder, love, hate, desire, 
 * See below, Treatise on Man, and Passions.
 
 DESCARTES PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 23 
 
 joy, and sadness, the most inTpoj:taiiluaLjlhich_J^the 
 first, wonder, which is purely theoretical ; the remaining 
 live are practical, being accompanied by a tendency to 
 bodily motions. The most perfect of all the passions 
 is intellectual love of God. All moral action consists 
 in mastery of the passions, and this is the secret of a 
 happy life. The passions partake of the body, ideas 
 are of the mind only pure thought. Mind, as such, 
 alwjiys thinks. In the human mind ideas differ as re- 
 "spects clearness and origin. As respects clearness, they 
 are adequate or inadequate ; in origin, they are formed 
 by the action of the individual mind, or borrowed, ad- 
 ventitious, or innate. The innate__ideas_are simply 
 thought itself, thp.jnkjmj^_i([pn_o_f things" 
 
 from the nature of the human mind; thus, also, the (/, >.. 
 
 Idea "of God .and of . .ourselves-- is -innate, ~ QLllie_ad- " 
 ventitious ideas, to which belong sensuous perceptions, 
 
 " musr'be distinguished those which correspond with 
 modes of external things and those which are simply 
 modes of thought, belonging only to the subject mind. 
 such as time and color, sound, taste. Of ideas fashioned 
 by ourselves, such as the siren, the centaur, these are 
 pure inventions, having no external objects correspond- 
 ing to them. In any idea regarded simply as a rep- 
 resentation, there is neither truth nor error. Truth and 
 error arise with judgments, and judgments are a com- 
 bination of intellect and will. Error comes from not 
 withholding the judgment till clear and distinct intui- 
 tion is gained, for the Divine veracity is pledged 
 that every clear and distinct perception shall be true. 
 The Divine mind is free from error because it has no 
 inadequate ideas. God's will is not like man's, condi- 
 tioned on intelligence ; rather the reverse is true. The 
 Divine will establishes even the eternal verities and
 
 24 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 the nature of good itself. The will of God must be 
 conceived of as absolutely free from the control of 
 necessity. The human will is most free when most 
 subject to the determination of the intellect. The 
 highest freedom is not indifference, but perfection in 
 truth and character. 
 
 Such, in brief statement, are the main features of 
 Descartes' philosophy. 
 
 Like every epoch-making system, that of Descartes 
 contained within itself the germs of others, and of 
 systems opposed to it and to each other. Descartes' 
 own system was an unresolved dualism. It contained 
 the principles of materialism, of subjective idealism, 
 and of pantheism. There can even be seen, in one 
 or two passages, a fugitive fore-gleam of the critical 
 philosophy of Kant. 
 
 We must notice briefly the influence of this system 
 on succeeding thought. Descartes, like all great 
 original thinkers, had disciples whose simple aim was 
 to communicate and expound the system unchanged. 
 The new philosophy found acceptance at the univer- 
 sities in the Netherlands. It was taught at Leyden, at 
 Utrecht, at Groningen, and at Franeker. At the same 
 time the system was violently attacked. It was found 
 to be in conflict with the Bible, and theological con- 
 troversy waxed warm. The motion of the earth and / 
 the infinity of the universe did not accord with eccle- 
 siastical opinion, nor with the prevailing interpretation 
 of the Scriptures. Cartesian theologians in defense 
 advocated an allegorical explanation of biblical lan- 
 guage. The doctrine had already been condemned 
 by the Synod of Dort (1656), and in the following 
 year by that of Deift. It aroused the opposition of 
 the Roman Church also, and the " Meditations " were
 
 DESCARTES PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 25 
 
 placed upon the " Index librorum prohibitorum" 
 "donee corrigantur" And, in consequence, in after 
 years even the dead body of the philosopher was at 
 first refused interment in a church in Paris, and al- 
 though this was finally allowed, funeral ceremonies 
 and the erection of a monument were forbidden. The 
 reigning monarch, Louis XIV., in league with the Jes- 
 uits, interdicted the teaching of the Cartesian doctrine 
 in the universities, and indeed throughout France. 
 This opposition was perhaps mainly due to the fact 
 that the Jansenists had adopted Cartesianism. But it 
 was occasioned also by the conflict between the meta- 
 physical theory of Descartes, that the essence of body 
 is extension, and the church doctrine of the real pres- 
 ence of Christ in the sacrament. The same body 
 cannot exist in different spaces at once ; transubstan- 
 tiation cannot therefore be true. Both the Jansenist 
 Arnauld* and the Jesuit Mesland f had urged this 
 conflict with the Eucharistic doctrine of the philoso- 
 pher's teaching concerning body and its extension, 
 and Descartes had replied to their objections. But 
 while the system had to encounter the hostility of the 
 theologians of the day, both Catholic and Protestant, 
 it found ready acceptance with those who cultivated 
 literature in that most brilliant age. The new and 
 striking views, the beautiful method, the charming 
 lucidity of presentation, made a profound impression 
 upon the French mind; they took powerful hold of the 
 foremost writers in prose and poetry, and thus contrib- 
 uted greatly to the formation of the classic style. 
 Cartesianism became the literary fashion. It was cul- 
 
 * (Euvres, t. ii, p. 35, Arnauld's objection ; t. ii, p. 78, Des- 
 cartes' reply. 
 
 \ (Euvres, t. ix, pp. 172 and 192, replies to Mesland.
 
 26 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 tivated by ladies and adopted by society. Accordingly 
 it soon was made a target for the wits of the day, as 
 the " Femmes Savantes " of Moliere bears witness, 
 and later the Jesuit Daniel's " Voyage du monde de 
 Descartes." * 
 
 The first important step in the development of the 
 Cartesian doctrine was taken in the theory of occa- 
 sionalism by Arnold Geulincx (1625-1669), professor 
 of philosophy at Leyden. He assumed as an axiom 
 that an efficient cause must be conscious not only of <_ 
 the effect but of the mode of its production. ( hnpos- 
 sibile est ut is faciat qui nescit quomodo fiat. Exten- 
 sion and motion have no relation to thought or sen- 
 sation in the way of causation. Body cannot act up- 
 on mind, volition cannot originate motion, because 
 he who wills knows not how his volition acts on his 
 brain, nerves, and muscles. Hence there can be no 
 reciprocal action of soul and body, and God alone is 
 the efficient cause of all that happens. God has so 
 connected these most opposed things, the motion of 
 matter and the volition of the will, that when a volition 
 arises the appropriate motion occurs, and vice versa, 
 there being no causal connection between the two ; but 
 God himself, on occasion of the one, produces the other. ' 
 PhilaretusJ (pseudonym), the editor of the Ethics 
 of Geulincx, to make this correspondence intelligible, 
 employs the illustration of the two clocks, which Leib- 
 
 * See Bouillier, " Histoire de la Philosophic Cari&ienne," t. i, 
 
 P. 425- 
 
 A Latin version of Daniel's book exists, " Her per Mundum Car- 
 tesii." Amsterdam, 1694. 
 
 f Bouillier, t. i, p. 286. 
 
 \ Bontekoe. See Erdmann, Hist, of Philos. Modern, pp. 29, 30, 
 trans.
 
 DESCARTES' PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 27 
 
 ^ jiitz afterward uses in the explanation of his own 
 
 theory. 
 
 Pere Nicholas Malebranche (1638-1 7 15), of the Ora- 
 tory of Jesus in Paris, a profound theologian of the 
 Augustinian type, and an enthusiastic disciple of Des- 
 cartes, applied the principles of the latter to the solu- 
 tion of the problem of knowledge. He accepted the 
 doctrine of the two mutually opposed substances, body 
 and mind, /'. e., extension and thought, between which 
 there can be no reciprocal influence (influxus physicu$\ 
 and adopted Occasionalism, whether as influenced by 
 Geulincx, or as the necessary consequence of dualism. 
 The special problem was to show the possibility of a 
 
 ^ knowledge of matter by mind, there being no natural 
 community, but, on the contrary, the most complete 
 opposition, between the two. Like Geulincx in ex- 
 plaining action, Malebranche, in explaining knowledge, 
 is obliged to have recourse to the third, and indeed, 
 strictly speaking, /. e., according to the definition, only 
 true substance, God. Accordingly, Malebranche says 
 God is the place of spirits ; we see things in God. " God 
 is through his presence so closely united with our souls 
 that we can say that he is the place of minds, exactly as 
 space is the place of bodies." * Bodies, which are 
 modifications of extension, are knowable only through 
 ideas ; they exist, therefore, in the only form in which 
 we can know them, in God alone, who is the universal 
 reason, the intelligible world, the intelligible, that is to 
 us the only real, extension. That which we see in God, 
 then, is not external things themselves, but the ideas 
 of things, the intelligible world. Not only these ideas, 
 but our sensations and our volitions, are produced in 
 
 * Recherche, liv. iii, pt. ii, ch. vi. Kuno Fischer, Descartes 
 
 and his School, p. 578, trans.
 
 28 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 us by God alone. Hence not only the idealism but 
 the pantheistic tendency of the system of Male- 
 branche. 
 
 Baruch (Benedictus) de Spinoza (born in Amsterdam, 
 1632, died at The Hague, 1677), made the philosophy 
 of Descartes his starting-point and completely trans- 
 formed its dualism into a monism, in which God is 
 declared to be the one sole substance (Substantia una 
 et unica). Spinoza adopted from Descartes the math- 
 ematical way of looking at things. Philosophical and 
 mathematical certainty are identical with him. Like 
 Descartes, therefore, he totally excludes final causes, 
 but with more emphatic protest, and not only from 
 physics but from ethics. Efficient causation he also 
 denies. Mathematics (philosophy, therefore) knows 
 nothing of causes, but only of reasons, nothing of 
 effects, but only of consequents.* The method of 
 presentation is mathematical. Of this, also, an ex- 
 ample had been given in Descartes, who, in what he 
 calls his synthetic demonstration of the being of God f 
 had presented the proof /;/ more geometrico. The 
 earliest published work of Spinoza was an exposi- 
 tion, in the mathematical form, of the principles of 
 Descartes' philosophy, and the same form is employed 
 in the Ethics, which is the chief exponent of his own 
 philosophical views. The fundamental notions in 
 Spinoza's system are those of substance, attribute, and 
 mode. The whole system turns on the definition oj[ 
 substance, adopted from Descartes. \ " By substance 
 I understand that which is in itself and is conceived 
 
 * Cf. Erdmann, Hist, of Philos. Modern, p. 52, trans., for the 
 true meaning of the term causa in Spinoza's writings. 
 
 f Rfyonses anx SJcondes Objections. (Euvrts, t. i, pp. 451-465. 
 \ Principe -s, pie. i, 51.
 
 DESCARTES' PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 29 
 
 through itself ; that is, that the conception of which 
 ; does not require the conception of anything else from 
 C^which it must be formed." * There necessarily can ex- 
 ist, then, but one substance; all else is attribute or mode. 
 The absolute substance is not ground of all being, but 
 rather ts all being. To this one unconditioned, all-in- 
 clusive being, Spinoza assigns the name God, but the 
 name nature is equally appropriate, hence he says, 
 Dens sive natura. But nature may be natura naturans, 
 that which is in itself, the absolute substance, the un- 
 conditioned ; or natura naturata, the modes of this 
 absolute substance, the world as a whole, or the sum 
 total of conditions of existence, which are both but two 
 aspects of the one reality. Attributes appear in 
 Spinoza's scheme to differ from modes only in this, 
 that they pertain to substance, not in reality, like modes, 
 but rather only in intelleclu, in the view of finite mind, 
 which is itself (however contradictorily), for Spinoza, 
 but a mode of infinite substance. Herein Spinoza 
 differs from Descartes, who taught that attribute 
 constitutes the essence of substance ; apparently, the 
 difference is between an objective and a subjective 
 conception of attribute. f The one substance must 
 then be conceived under the two attributes, thought 
 and extension, as thinking substance and extended 
 substance, while in reality there is but one sole sub- 
 stance (Dens sive natura}. This distinction between 
 what/V and what must be //////;/ is suggestive of Tran- 
 scendentalism, but Spinoza's position is not that of 
 Kant, but that of the dogmatist ; he held, with Des- 
 cartes, that what is clearly thought does not differ 
 from what is. It is difficult at this point to repel the 
 
 * Ethics, Def . 3. 
 
 fCf. Erdmann, Hist, of P kilos. Modern, p. 67.
 
 30 y THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 charge of inconsistency, and the difficulty is greatly in- 
 creased when we find these attributes, which are af- 
 firmed to exist, not in reality, but only for the human 
 understanding as necessary notions, treated as inde- 
 pendent and mutually opposed substances. No less 
 than Descartes, Spinoza strenuously insists that 
 neither spirit can act on matter, nor matter on spirit ; 
 but he insists further that each is the other, different 
 forms of one and the same substance, just as " the idea 
 of the circle and the actual circle are the same thing, 
 now under the attribute of thought, and again under 
 that of extension." Again, when explaining the possi- 
 bility of particular or individual existence in a system 
 which posits one sole substance and affirms omnis de- 
 terminatio est negatio, Spinoza refers them to the in- 
 finite modes of the one substance of which, like waves 
 of the sea,* they are the transient expression, having 
 in themselves apart no reality, and constituting, all 
 taken together, a realm of conditioned existence, 
 each member dependent on the rest, and all bound 
 together by the chain of necessity, a realm of ap- 
 pearance, fugitive, and, for pure thought, appear- 
 ance only. Hence Spinoza's acosmism. \ The dualism 
 of Descartes is thus transformed by Spinoza into an 
 abstract monism, but the system was implicitly con- 
 tained in Descartes' definition of substance, which 
 Spinoza takes for his starting-point. 
 
 In precisely the opposite direction, the first great 
 German philosopher, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz 
 (1646-17 16), starting also from the notion of substance, 
 which he defines, however, as living activity, develops 
 the doctrine of the plurality of substances. As with 
 
 * Erdmann's comparison, see Hist, of Philos. Modern, p. 61. 
 f Hegel thus designates the system.
 
 DESCARTES PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 31 
 
 Spinoza, thought not extension, mind not matter, is the 
 essential form of being ; but in opposition to him, in- 
 dividuality and, therefore, plurality of mind-sub- 
 stances is asserted. The universe, physical and spir- 
 itual, is an aggregate or, rather hierarchy of such 
 individual minds, which Leibnitz calls monads. While 
 rejecting the position of Descartes that thought, as 
 such, is necessarily conscious, Leibnitz retains, and de- 
 velops into an essential element of his own theory, a dis- 
 tinction which Descartes had pointed out in the nature 
 ;' of perceptions between clear and obscure, distinct and 
 confused. Ail monads are souls, all have perceptions, 
 but not all have consciousness. Hence the gradation ; 
 inorganic nature moves, plants sleep, animals dream, 
 spirits think; God, the supreme monad, whence all 
 radiate, is absolute creative Intelligence, who, being 
 the source of all, knows all completely. 
 
 Leibnitz, who, with Descartes, denied (as, indeed, 
 his own theory of the monads required) any influence 
 reciprocally between body and mind, rejected also the 
 theory of Occasionalism, and substituted for it the doc- 
 trine of the Preestablished Harmony, in illustration 
 of which he uses the comparison of two clocks, origi- 
 nally so perfect in construction that each, although 
 entirely independent of the other, keeps exact time 
 with it.* 
 
 The philosophy of Leibnitz is idealism, or spiritism, 
 Descartes had made the essence of matter to consist 
 in extension ; Leibnitz conceives the essence of sub- 
 stance to be activity, life, mind. The monads are 
 perceptive in all degrees, from complete unconscious- 
 
 * Descartes had already employed the illustration of a single 
 clock in explaining the human body as a machine.
 
 ^2 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 ness in the inorganic world, to full self-consciousness <e* 
 of spirit in man and deity. Individualism has re- 
 placed monism. Each monad is isolated and indepen- 
 dent of the rest. Each is living substance, or soul, / 
 and the monads are innumerable. In place of the one 
 substance of Spinoza (and virtually of Malebranche), 
 instead of the two opposed substances of Descartes, 
 we have, then, in Leibnitz, an indefinitely great number 
 of substances, alike in being souls, but unlike in the \ 
 degree of participation in psychical life. In place of 
 occasionalism we have the eternally preestablished 
 harmony, through which, out of isolated monads, a 
 universe becomes possible.* 
 
 The theory of knowledge connects Leibnitz with 
 Locke, whose doctrine of empiricism he opposed. 
 John Locke (1632-1704) interested himself as a philos- 
 opher in the problem of knowledge. Innate ideas, 
 adventitious ideas, and fictitious ideas was the classifi- 
 cation Descartes had made of the ideas of the mind ; 
 teaching, at the same time, that to have an idea the 
 mind must be conscious of having it. Locke easily 
 made it appear that, with this condition, there could be 
 no innate ideas, and that the human mind was in pos- 
 session only of the adventitious ideas, or those derived 
 from other sources than the thinking faculty itself, 
 which sources Locke found to be two, sensation and 
 reflection, i. e., outer and inner sense. The thinking 
 faculty is, prior to experience, a tabula rasa. Hence 
 the theory of knowledge is that of pure empiricism. 
 
 The further development of Locke's empiricism 
 into the philosophical skepticism of Hume, the sub- 
 
 * In his Theodicee Leibnitz carries out the thought of Descartes 
 [Med. IV] that the perfection of the universe as a whole requires 
 the imperfection of its parts. Cf. Bishop Butler, Analogy, ch. vii.
 
 DESCARTES' PHILOSOPHY ITS INFLUENCE. 33 
 
 jective idealism of Berkeley, the materialism of the 
 French Encyclopedists and the Systeme de la Nature, 
 it is not necessary here to trace. It may be re- 
 marked, however, that the skepticism of Hume recalls, 
 by contrast, the provisional doubting of all things 
 by Descartes, that the idealism of Berkeley was 
 already suggested in the Je pense, done je suis j and 
 that the French materialistic movement renews 
 the first great French philosopher's attempt to 
 resolve all bodily life into mechanism and motion. 
 Leibnitz, by his doctrine of unconscious mental ac- 
 tivity, in opposition to Descartes' limitation of mind 
 to consciousness, was able to give its true significance 
 to the theory of the innate ideas (the i'vvoiai ideal 
 of the Greeks), and thus, by giving emphasis to the 
 intellectual principles, as Locke to the empirical 
 element, opened the path to a reconstruction of 
 philosophy at the hands of Kant, who, partly in op- 
 position to, partly in agreement with, dogmatism on 
 the one hand, and empiricism on the other, but 
 mainly by introducing the new method and principle 
 of criticism, brought in a new epoch and changed 
 thereafter the whole aspect of philosophy. 
 
 It would be entirely incorrect to say that Des- 
 cartes had forestalled Kant, or that the principles 
 of the critical philosophy are contained in the Med- 
 itations, or the Principles, of the great French 
 thinker, yet there are interesting passages in the 
 Rules for the Direction of the Mind, and in the 
 Principles also, which show that he was fully aware 
 of the fundamental importance of the problem of the 
 nature of cognition itself, and states that problem
 
 34 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 almost in the very language of Kant,* while in his 
 doctrine of space and time, but particularly of the 
 latter, which he regards as nothing more than a 
 modus cogitandi, he reminds the reader of the famous 
 exposition in the Transcendental ^Esthetic of the 
 Critique of Pure Reason. 
 
 *See Kuno Fischer, Descartes and his School, p. 495, trans.
 
 THE SELECTIONS. 
 
 THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD, 
 
 PARTS I, II, III. 
 
 35
 
 THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD.* 
 
 PART FIRST. 
 
 .... My design is not to point out the method 
 which everyone must follow for the right direction of 
 his understanding, but merely to show how I have 
 attempted to conduct my own. Those who take it 
 upon themselves to give precepts to others must 
 assume that they are themselves better instructed 
 than those to whom they give them, and if they make 
 the least error, they are answerable for it. But as I 
 offer this production merely as a piece of personal 
 history, or of fiction, if you please, in which, among 
 some examples which may well be imitated, there 
 will be found, perhaps, many others also which one 
 might reasonably decline to follow, I hope that it 
 may prove useful to some and harmful to none, and 
 that all will take my frankness kindly. 
 
 I was brought up to letters from my childhood, and 
 because I was led to believe that by means of them 
 clear and certain knowledge of all that was useful in 
 life might be acquired, I had an extreme desire for 
 learning. But no sooner had I completed the whole 
 course of studies at the end of which it is customary 
 for one to be received into the circle of the learned, 
 than I changed my opinion entirely. For I found 
 myself involved in so many doubts and errors, that it 
 seemed to me that I had derived no other advantage 
 
 * CEuvres, t. i, p. 124. 
 
 37
 
 38 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 from my endeavors to instruct myself but only to find 
 out more and more how ignorant I was. And yet I 
 was in one of the most celebrated schools in Europe, 
 where I thought there must be learned men if there 
 were any such in the world. I had acquired all that 
 others learned there, and more than that, not being 
 content with the sciences which were taught us, I ran 
 through all the books I could get hold of which treated 
 of matters considered most curious and rare. More- 
 over, I knew what others thought about me, and I did 
 not perceive that they considered me inferior to my 
 fellow-students, albeit there were among them some 
 who were destined to fill the places of our masters. 
 And finally, our time appeared to me to be as flourish- 
 ing and as prolific of good minds as any preceding 
 time had been. Such considerations emboldened me 
 to judge all others by myself, and served to convince 
 me that there did not exist in the world any such wis- 
 dom as I had been led to hope for. However, I did 
 not cease to think well of scholastic pursuits. I knew 
 that the languages taught in the schools were indis- 
 pensable for the understanding of the ancient books ; 
 that light and graceful stories stimulate the mind ; 
 that the memorable deeds of history exalt it, and 
 that when read with discretion they help to form the 
 judgment ; that the reading of all good books is like 
 conversation with the noble men of bygone times a 
 studied conversation, even, in which only their best 
 
 thoughts are disclosed But I thought I had 
 
 already given time enough to languages and to the 
 literature of the ancients, to their histories and to 
 their fables. To talk with men of other times is like 
 traveling. It is well to know something of the man- 
 ners of foreign peoples, in order that we may judge
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 39 
 
 our own more wisely, and that we may not suppose 
 that what is different from our own habits is ridicu- 
 lous and contrary to reason, as those do who have not 
 seen the world. But if one spends too much time in 
 traveling in foreign countries, he becomes at last a 
 stranger in his own ; and when one is too curious to 
 know what has been done in past ages, he is liable to 
 remain ignorant of what is going on in his own time. 
 Moreover, fiction represents many events as possible 
 which are not so ; and even the most faithful histories, 
 if they do not deviate from truth nor dignify events to 
 make them more impressive, at least they almost 
 always omit the meaner and the less illustrious inci- 
 dents, so that it comes about that the rest is not what 
 it really was, and those who govern their conduct by 
 the examples there furnished are liable to fall into the 
 extravagances of the paladins of our romances, and 
 to conceive designs which surpass their ability. 
 
 Eloquence I held in high esteem, and I was in love 
 with poetry ; but I regarded both as the gifts of 
 genius rather than the fruit of study. Those who 
 have the strongest reasoning powers and who best 
 digest their thoughts in order to make them clear and 
 intelligible, are always the best able to speak per- 
 suasively, although they may talk the dialect of Lower 
 Brittany and have never learned rhetoric ; and those 
 who have the most delightful fancies, and who can ex- 
 press them with sweetness and grace, are the best 
 poets, although the art of poetry is unknown to them. 
 
 Above all I was delighted with the mathematics, on 
 account of the certainty and evidence of their demon- 
 strations, but I had not as yet found out their true use, 
 and although I supposed that they were of service only 
 in the mechanic arts, I was surprised that upon foun-
 
 40 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART 1 
 
 dations so solid and stable no loftier structure had been 
 raised : while, on the other hand, I compared the writ- 
 ings of the ancient moralists to palaces very proud and 
 very magnificent, but which are built on nothing but 
 
 sand or mud I revered our theology, and, as 
 
 much as anyone, I strove to gain heaven ; but when I 
 learned, as an assured fact, that the way is open no less 
 to the most ignorant than to the most learned, and that 
 the revealed truths which conduct us thither lie beyond 
 the reach of our intelligence, I did not presume to sub- 
 mit them to the feebleness of my reasonings, and I 
 thought that, to undertake the examination of them and 
 succeed in the attempt, required extraordinary divine 
 assistance and more than human gifts. I had 
 nothing to say of philosophy, save that, seeing it had 
 been cultivated by the best minds for many ages, and 
 still there was nothing in it which might not be brought 
 into dispute, and which was, therefore, not free from 
 doubt, I had not the presumption to hope for better suc- 
 cess therein than others ; and considering how many di- 
 verse opinions may be held upon the same subject 
 and defended by the learned, while not more than one 
 of them can be true, I regarded as pretty nearly false 
 all that was merely probable. Then, as to the other 
 sciences which derive their principles from philosophy, 
 I judged that nothing solid could be built upon foun- 
 dations so unstable ; and neither the fame nor the 
 emolument they promised me were sufficient to induce 
 me to acquire them ; for, thanks to a kind Provi- 
 dence, I did not find myself in a condition of life 
 which required me to make science a profession for 
 the bettering of my estate ; and although I did not 
 profess to despise fame, like a cynic, still I thought 
 very little of that which I could not hope to acquire
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 41 
 
 except on false pretenses. And finally, as for the 
 pseudo-sciences, I thought I was already sufficiently 
 acquainted with their value to be proof against the 
 promises of the alchemist, the predictions of the 
 astrologer, the impostures of the magician, the artifices 
 and vain boasting of those who profess to know more 
 than they actually do know.* 
 
 For these reasons, so soon as I was old enough to 
 be no longer subject to the control of my teachers, I 
 abandoned literary pursuits altogether, and, being re- 
 solved to seek no other knowledge than that which I 
 was able to find within myself or in the great book of 
 the world, I spent the remainder of my youth in travel- 
 ing, in seeing courts and armies, in mingling with peo- 
 ple of various dispositions and conditions in life, in 
 collecting a variety of experiences, putting myself to 
 the proof in the crises of fortune, and reflecting on all 
 occasions on whatever might present itself, so as to 
 derive from it what profit I might. For it appeared to 
 me that I might find a great deal more of truth in 
 reasonings such as everyone carries on with reference 
 to the affairs which immediately concern himself, and 
 where the issue will bring speedy punishment if he 
 make a mistake, than in those which a man of letters 
 conducts in his private study with regard to specula- 
 tions, which have no other effect and are of no further 
 consequence to him than to tickle his vanity the less 
 they are understood by common people, and the more 
 they require wit and skill to make them seem probable. 
 And I always had an extreme desire to learn how to 
 
 * Lewes in his Biographical History of Philosophy,^. 363, finds 
 " a remarkable resemblance '' between Descartes' Discourse and 
 the Arabian Philosopher Algazzali's Revivification of the Sciences 
 of Religion.
 
 42 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 distinguish the true from the false, so that I might see 
 clearly and proceed with assurance in the affairs of 
 this present life. 
 
 It is true that while I was employed only in observ- 
 ing the manners of foreigners, I found very little to 
 establish my mind, and saw as much diversity here as 
 I had seen before in the opinions of philosophers. So 
 that the principal benefit I derived from it was that, 
 observing many things which, although they appear to 
 us to be very extravagant and ridiculous, are yet 
 commonly received and approved by other great 
 peoples, I gradually became emancipated from many 
 errors which tend to obscure the natural light within 
 us, and make us less capable of listening to reason. 
 But after I had spent some years thus in studying in 
 the book of the world, and trying to gain some ex- 
 perience, I formed one day the resolution to study 
 within myself, and to devote all the powers of my 
 mind to choosing the paths which I must thereafter 
 follow ; a project attended with much greater success, 
 as I think, than it would have been had I never left 
 my country nor my books. 
 
 PART SECOND. 
 
 I WAS then in Germany, whither the wars, which 
 were not yet ended there, had summoned me ; and 
 when I was returning to the army, from the coronation 
 of the emperor, the coming on of the winter de- 
 tained me in a quarter where, finding no one I wished 
 to talk with, and fortunately having no cares nor 
 passions to trouble me, I spent the whole day shut up 
 in a room heated by a stove, where I had all the leisure 
 I desired to hold converse with my own thoughts. 
 One of the first thoughts to occur to me was that there
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 43 
 
 is often less completeness in works made up of many 
 parts and by the hands of different masters than in 
 those upon which only one has labored. Thus we see 
 that buildings which a single architect has undertaken 
 and erected are usually much more beautiful and sym- 
 metrical than those which many have tried to recon- 
 struct, using old walls which were built for other pur- 
 poses. 
 
 So those old cities which, at the beginning being 
 nothing but straggling villages, have in course of 
 time become great towns, are generally so badly ar- 
 ranged, compared with the regularly laid out towns 
 which an engineer plots according to his fancy on 
 a level plain, that although, when you look at single 
 buildings by themselves, you find often as much or 
 even more art than in those of other cities, and yet 
 to see how they are placed, a great building here, a 
 little one there, and how crooked and irregular the 
 streets are, you would say that chance rather than the 
 will of men in the use of their reason had so disposed 
 
 them And so I thought that the sciences 
 
 contained in books, at least those in which the proofs 
 were merely probable and not demonstrations, being 
 the gradual accumulation of opinions of many differ- 
 ent persons, by no means come so near the truth as 
 the plain reasoning of a man of good sense in regard 
 to the matters which present themselves to him. 
 
 And I thought still further that, because we alt 
 have been children before we were men, and for a 
 long time of necessity were under the control of our 
 inclinations and our tutors, who were often of differ- 
 ent minds, and none of whom perhaps gave us the 
 best of counsels, it is almost impossible that our judg- 
 ments should be as free from error and as solid as
 
 44 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 they would have been if we had had the entire use of 
 our reason from the moment of our birth, and had 
 always been guided by that alone 
 
 As for all the opinions which I had accepted up to 
 that time, I was persuaded that I could do no better 
 than get rid of them at once, in order to replace them 
 afterward with better ones, or perhaps with the same, 
 if I should succeed in making them square with reason. 
 And I firmly believed that in this way I should have 
 much greater success in the conduct of my life than 
 if I should build only on the old foundations, and 
 should rely only on the principles which I had allowed 
 myself to be persuaded of in my youth, without ever 
 having examined whether they were true 
 
 My design has never reached further than the 
 attempt to reform my own opinions, and to build 
 upon a foundation altogether my own. But although 
 I am well enough pleased with my work to present 
 you here a sketch of it, I would not on that account 
 advise anyone to imitate me The simple reso- 
 lution to strip one's self of all that he has hitherto be- 
 lieved is not an example for everyone to follow 
 
 But having discovered while at college that there is 
 nothing whatever so strange or incredible that has 
 not been said by some philosopher ; and afterward, in 
 my travels, having observed that not all those who 
 cherish opinions quite contrary to our own are there- 
 fore barbarians or savages, but that many of these 
 peoples use their reason as well or better than we do ; 
 and having considered how differently the same man, 
 with the same mind, would turn out, if he were 
 brought up from infancy among the French or the 
 Germans, from what he would if he always lived 
 among the Chinese or with cannibals ; and observing
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 45 
 
 how, even in fashions of dress, the same thing which 
 pleased us ten years ago, and, it may be, will please 
 us again ten years hence, appears to us now extrava- 
 gant and ridiculous ; so that it is rather custom and 
 example than certain knowledge which persuades us ; 
 and yet a plurality of votes is no proof that a thing is 
 true, especially where truths are difficult of discovery, 
 in which case it is much more likely that a man left to 
 himself will find them out sooner than people in general 
 taking all these things into consideration, and not 
 being able to select anyone whose opinions seemed 
 to me to be preferable to those of others, I found my- 
 self, as it were, compelled to take myself as my guide. 
 But like a man who walks alone and in the dark, I re- 
 solved to go so slowly and to use so much caution in 
 everything, that, even if I did not get on very far, I 
 should at least keep from falling. Likewise I was un- 
 willing at the start to reject summarily any opinion 
 which might have insinuated itself into my belief 
 without having been introduced there by reason, but 
 I would first spend time enough to draw up a plan of 
 the work I was undertaking and to discover the true 
 method for arriving at the knowledge of whatever my 
 mind was capable of. 
 
 I had studied, in earlier years, of the branches of 
 philosophy, logic, and in mathematics, geometrical 
 analysis and algebra, three arts or sciences which 
 seemed likely to afford some assistance to my design. 
 But on examination of them I observed, in respect to 
 logic, that its syllogism and the greater part of its 
 processes are of service principally in explaining to 
 another what one already knows himself, or, like the art 
 of Lully, they enable him to talk without judgment on 
 matters in which he is ignorant, rather than help him
 
 46 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 to acquire knowledge of them ; and while it contains 
 in reality many very true and very excellent precepts, 
 there are nevertheless mixed with these many others 
 which are either harmful or superfluous, and which are 
 almost as difficult to separate from the rest as to draw 
 forth a Diana or a Minerva from a block of marble 
 which is not yet rough-hewn. Moreover, as regards 
 the analysis of the ancients and the algebra of the 
 moderns, besides that they relate only to very abstract 
 matters, and of no practical use, the first is always so 
 restricted to the consideration of figures that it can- 
 not employ the understanding without fatiguing the 
 imagination, and in the second one is so confined to 
 certain rules and symbols that, in place of a science 
 which cultivates the mind, we have only a confused 
 and obscure art productive of mental embarrassment. 
 For this reason I thought that some other method 
 should be sought out which, comprising the ad- 
 vantages of these three, should be exempt from their 
 defects. And as a multiplicity of laws often furnishes 
 excuses for vices, so that a state is best governed 
 which has but few and those strictly obeyed ; in 
 like manner, in place of the multitude of precepts 
 of which logic is composed, I believed I should find 
 the four following rules quite sufficient, provided I 
 should firmly and steadfastly resolve not to fail of ob- 
 serving them in a single instance.* 
 
 The first rule was never to receive anything as a 
 truth which I did not clearly know to be such ; that 
 is, to avoid haste and prejudice, and not to compre- 
 hend anything more in my judgments than that which 
 should present itself so clearly and so distinctly to my 
 
 * Compare Rules for the Direction of the Mind, below, p. 6r, 
 et seq.
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 47 
 
 mind that I should have no occasion to entertain a 
 doubt of it. 
 
 The second rule was to divide every difficulty which 
 I should examine into as many parts as possible, or 
 as might be required for resolving it. 
 
 The third rule was to conduct my thoughts in an 
 orderly manner, beginning with objects the most sim- 
 ple and the easiest to understand, in order to ascend 
 as it were by steps to the knowledge of the most com- 
 posite, assuming some order to exist even in things 
 which did not appear to be naturally connected. 
 
 IThe last rule was to make enumerations so complete,! 
 and reviews so comprehensive, that I should be certain! 
 of omitting nothing. 
 
 Those long chains of reasoning, quite simple and 
 easy, which geometers are wont to employ in the ac- 
 complishment of their most difficult demonstrations, 
 led me to think that everything which might fall under 
 the cognizance of the human mind might be connected 
 together in a similar manner, and that, provided only 
 one should take care not to receive anything as true 
 which was not so, and if one were always careful to 
 preserve the order necessary for deducing one truth 
 from another, there would be none so remote at which 
 he might not at last arrive, nor so concealed which 
 he might not discover. And I had no great difficulty 
 in finding those with which to make a beginning, for 
 I knew already that these must be the simplest and 
 easiest to apprehend ; and considering that, among all 
 those who had up to this time made discoveries in the 
 sciences, it was the mathematicians alone who had been 
 able to arrive at demonstrations that is to say, at 
 proofs certain and evident I did not doubt that I 
 should begin with the same truths which they have
 
 48 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 investigated, although I had looked for no other 
 advantage from them than to accustom my mind 
 to nourish itself upon truths and not to be satis- 
 fied with false reasons. But I had no intention to at- 
 tempt to learn all the sciences which pass under the 
 name of mathematics ; and perceiving that, while their 
 subjects were different, they all agreed in this, that they 
 considered nothing else but the various relations and 
 proportions existing therein, I thought that it would 
 be of advantage to examine solely proportions in gen- 
 eral, considering them only in subjects which would 
 serve to render my knowledge of them more easy, 
 at the same time not restricting them in any wise 
 thereto, in order so much the better afterward to ap- 
 ply them to all others to which they might be suited. 
 Next, having observed that, in order to compre- 
 hend them, it was necessary for me sometimes to con- 
 sider each of them in particular, and sometimes merely 
 to remember them, or to combine many of them to- 
 gether, I thought that for the better consideration of 
 them in particular I ought to conceive them in lines, 
 because I could find nothing more simple, and nothing 
 that I could represent more distinctly to my imagina- 
 tion and my senses ; but that, to retain them or to 
 comprehend many of them together, it would be 
 necessary for me to represent them by certain sym- 
 bols as concise as possible, and for this purpose I 
 might employ with the greatest advantage geometrical 
 analysis and algebra, and that I might correct all the 
 defects of the one by the other. 
 
 And I am free to say that the exact observance 
 of these few rules which I had laid down gave me 
 such facility in solving all the questions to which 
 these two sciences apply, that in the two or three
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 49 
 
 months which I spent in examining them, having be- 
 gun with the simplest and most general, and each truth 
 that I discovered being a rule which was of service to 
 me afterward in the discovery of others, not only did 
 I arrive at many which formerly I had considered very 
 difficult, but it seemed to me, toward the end, that 
 1 was able to determine even in those matters where 
 I was ignorant by what means and how far it would 
 be possible to resolve them. In this I shall not appear 
 to you to be very vain, perhaps, if you will only con- 
 sider that there is, in respect to each case, but one truth, 
 and that he who finds it knows as much about it as 
 anyone can know ; as, for example, a child, who has 
 learned arithmetic, when he has made an addition ac- 
 cording to the rules, can be assured that he has found 
 out, in respect to the sum that he has computed, all 
 that it is possible for the human mind to discover. Be- 
 cause, in a word, the method which shows one how to 
 follow the true order, and to take account exactly of 
 all the circumstances of the subject under investigation, 
 contains all that which gives certitude to the rules of 
 arithmetic. But that which pleased me most in this 
 method was the fact that by means of it I was using 
 my reason in everything, if not perfectly, yet in a 
 manner the very best in my power ; besides, I noticed 
 that in following it my mind was accustoming itself by 
 degrees to conceive its object more clearly and dis- 
 tinctly ; and, without restricting it to any particular 
 subject, I hoped to apply it as successfully to the 
 difficulties of other sciences as I had done to those of 
 algebra. Not that I had dared to undertake at once 
 to examine all that presented themselves, for that 
 would have been contrary to the order which the 
 method had prescribed, but observing that their prin-
 
 50 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 ciples must in every case be derived from philosophy, 
 in which I had not yet found any that were certain, 
 I thought it to be necessary first of all to attempt to 
 establish them there, and that, this being of all things 
 of the greatest importance, and an inquiry where, 
 above all, haste and prejudice were to be feared, I 
 ought not to undertake the task until I had reached 
 a riper age than that of twenty-three years, which was 
 then my age, and until I had spent a considerable 
 time in eradicating from my mind all those false ideas 
 which I had received previously, as well as in accu- 
 mulating a stock of experiences to form the matter 
 of my reasonings, and in exercising myself constantly 
 in the method which I had prescribed for myself, in 
 order to strengthen myself therein more and more. 
 
 PART THIRD. 
 
 AND finally, since before one begins to rebuild the 
 house in which he is living, it is not enough that 
 he should tear it down, and provide materials and 
 architects, or study architecture for himself, and 
 then make a careful design, but it is also necessary 
 that he should be provided with some other house, in 
 which he may comfortably lodge while the new one 
 is building ; in like manner, in order that I might not 
 lead an irresolute life during the time in which reason 
 required me to remain undecided in my opinions, and 
 in order that I might not thenceforward fail of living 
 as happily as possible, I formed for myself a pro- 
 visional moral code consisting of only three or four 
 maxims which I desire to lay before you. 
 
 The first was to obey the laws and customs of my 
 native land, holding steadfastly to the religion in which, 
 by the grace of God, I had been brought up from in-
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 51 
 
 fancy, and to govern myself in every other concern in 
 accordance with opinions the most moderate and fur- 
 thest from excess, such as were commonly put in prac- 
 tice by the most sensible people among those with 
 whom I had to live. Because, beginning from that 
 time onward to count for nothing my own opinions, 
 for the reason that I wished to submit them all to ex- 
 amination, I was convinced that I could not do better 
 than to follow those of the most sensible. And al- 
 though there might be just as sensible people among 
 the Persians or the Chinese as among ourselves, it 
 appeared to me to be more to my advantage to regu- 
 late my conduct by those with whom I had to live ; 
 and, in order to know what their opinions really were, 
 I ought rather to observe what they practiced than 
 what they said, not only because that, in the corrup- 
 tion of our manners, very few people are willing to 
 say all that they think, but also because most persons 
 are ignorant of their own thoughts ; for the act of 
 thought in which one thinks anything being distinct 
 from that in which he perceives that he thinks it, 
 the one may often be without the other. And among 
 many opinions equally acceptable, I chose only the 
 most moderate, not only because those are always 
 the most suitable to put in practice, and probably the 
 best, all excess being usually bad, but also in order 
 that I might find myself less astray from the true path 
 than I should if, having chosen one of the extremes, 
 it should turn out that it was the other which should 
 have been followed. And, in particular, I set down 
 as excess all pledges whereby one restricts his liberty ; 
 not that I disapproved of laws, which, to remedy the 
 inconstancy of feeble minds, allow, when one has a 
 good end in view, or even, for security in business
 
 52 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 transactions, when the end is quite indifferent, that 
 vows or contracts should be made which bind a per- 
 son to his engagements ; but because I did not see 
 anything anywhere which remained always in the 
 same state, and for myself in particular, who had en- 
 gaged to improve my opinions more and more, and 
 not to make them worse, I thought it would be com- 
 mitting a great sin against good sense if, because I 
 approved something then, I should oblige myself to 
 approve it ever afterward, when perhaps it had ceased 
 to be good or I had ceased to consider it so. 
 
 My second maxim was to be as firm and resolute 
 in my conduct as I could, and to follow the most 
 doubtful opinions, when I had once made up my 
 mind to do so, with no less constancy than if they 
 were very well grounded ; imitating in this respect 
 travelers, who, on finding out that they are lost in a 
 forest, should not wander about, turning now to this 
 side and now to that, still less stay in one spot, but 
 always move on as nearly as possible in the same 
 direction, and not change it except for sufficient 
 reasons, although, perhaps, at the beginning, it was 
 nothing but chance which led them to choose it, be- 
 cause, in this way, although they may not come out 
 precisely where they may have wished, they will in 
 the end at least arrive somewhere, where they will 
 probably be better off than in the middle of a forest. 
 In a similar manner, in the conduct of life, where 
 actions often do not admit of delay, it is a truth very 
 certain that when it is not in our power to discern 
 the truest opinion, we ought to follow the most prob- 
 able ; and even although we may not see more 
 probability in some than in others, we ought never- 
 theless to commit ourselves to some opinions, and
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 53 
 
 thereafter consider them in their relation to conduct 
 as being no longer doubtful, but perfectly true and 
 certain, because the reason is so which made them 
 choose it. This rule observed has delivered me from 
 all the repentings and regrets which vex the con- 
 sciences of those weak and wavering souls who allow 
 themselves inconsiderately to put in practice, as if 
 they were good, things which they afterward judge to 
 be bad. 
 
 My third maxim was to try always to conquer 
 myself rather than fortune, and to change my desires 
 rather than the order of the world, and, in general, to 
 accustom myself to believe that there is nothing 
 whatever so entirely within our power as our thoughts 
 are, so that after we have done our best in respect to 
 things external to us, whatever there is lacking to 
 success is, as regards ourselves, absolutely impossible. 
 And this of itself seemed to me enough to prevent 
 me from desiring for the future anything which I 
 could not obtain, and thus to make me contented ; 
 for, inasmuch as our will is naturally inclined to desire 
 only those things which our understanding repre- 
 sents to us as being somehow attainable, it is cer- 
 tain that, if we consider all the good things which are 
 external to us as equally removed from our power, 
 we shall feel no more regret at the loss of those which 
 seem to be due to our birth, when we shall be deprived 
 of them through no fault of our own, than we should 
 feel at not possessing the kingdoms of China or 
 Mexico ; and making a virtue of necessity, as they 
 say, we shall no more desire to be well when ill, nor to 
 be at liberty while in prison, than we should now desire 
 to have bodies made of some matter as incorruptible 
 as diamonds, or wings to fly with like birds. But I
 
 54 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 own that long practice is needed, and often repeated 
 reflection, to accustom one's self to look on all things 
 from this point of view ; and I believe that chiefly in 
 this consisted the secret of those philosophers who 
 in former times were able to deliver themselves from 
 the sway of fortune, and, despite suffering and 
 poverty, to vie with their gods in felicity. For, 
 steadfastly considering the limits assigned to them 
 by nature, they so fully persuaded themselves that 
 nothing whatever was in their power but their 
 thoughts, that, by itself alone, this was enough to 
 keep them from having any yearning for other things ; 
 and over their thoughts they held a sway so absolute 
 that they had therein good reason to look upon 
 themselves as being richer, more powerful, more free, 
 and more happy than any of their fellow-men, who, 
 without this philosophy, favored, as they might be, 
 by nature and by fortune, could never thus control all 
 that they desired. 
 
 Finally, to make a conclusion of my~code of morals, 
 I was minded to pass in review the various occupa- 
 tions of men in this life, with a view of choosing the 
 best ; and, without wishing to pronounce upon those 
 of others, I thought that I could do no better than to 
 keep on in the same pursuit in which I was engaged, 
 that is to say, spending all my life in the cultivation of 
 my reason, and in making as much progress as I could 
 in the knowledge of truth, following out the method I 
 had laid down for myself. I have found, since I be- 
 gan to make use of this method, satisfactions so great 
 as I do not believe more sweet or more innocent can 
 be known in this life : and discovering every day, by 
 means of it, important truths, as it seemed to me, and 
 of which most men were ignorant, the gratification I
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 55 
 
 had from it so filled my mind that nothing else affected 
 me at all. Besides, the three preceding maxims were 
 founded simply on the design I had of carrying on 
 my work of self-instruction. For inasmuch as God 
 has given to each one of us some light for discerning 
 the true from the false, I could not believe I should 
 be content with the opinions of others for a single 
 moment, if I had not proposed to use my own judg- 
 ment in examining them when the proper time should 
 arrive ; and I could not have followed them without 
 scruple had I not been confident that in doing so I 
 should lose no opportunity of finding out better ones, 
 if such should exist ; and finally, I should not have 
 been able to limit my desires nor be content, had I 
 not followed a path by which I felt sure of attaining 
 all the knowledge I should be capable of, and as well 
 all the real good which should ever be within my 
 power. Inasmuch as our will is never inclined to pur- 
 sue or to avoid anything except as our understand- 
 ing represents it as good or bad, all that is needed for 
 one to act rightly is that he judge correctly; and the 
 best judgment he can form is all that is necessary to 
 secure his best action, that is to say. the acquisition 
 of all the virtues, together with all other goods within 
 one's power : and when all that is assured, content- 
 ment must follow. 
 
 After I had thus become satisfied of the worth of 
 these maxims and had given them a place by them- 
 selves alongside the verities of the Faith, which have 
 always stood first in my belief, I judged that as for all 
 the rest of my opinions I might freely begin to rid 
 myself of them. And inasmuch as I hoped to be 
 able the better to bring this about by mingling with 
 my fellow-men than by staying any longer shut up in
 
 $6 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 the room where I had all these thoughts, the winter 
 was hardly well over before I set out on my travels 
 again. And in all the nine years that followed I did 
 nothing but roam from place to place, as a spectator 
 rather than an actor in the drama of life ; and while 
 I gave particular attention in each case to that in it 
 which afforded occasion for doubt, and wherein one 
 might be mistaken, at the same time I was rooting out 
 from my own mind the errors which had already in- 
 sinuated themselves. Not, however, that in so doing I 
 imitated the skeptics, who doubt only for doubt's sake, 
 and desire permanent uncertainty ; for, on the contrary, 
 my whole design tended only to assurance and to the 
 rejection of the shifting soil or sand, to find solid 
 foundation on the rock or the hard clay. 
 
 In this I was quite successful, as I thought, inas- 
 much as, in my endeavor to detect the falsity or un- 
 certainty of the propositions I was examining, not by 
 feeble conjecture, but by clear and sure reasoning, 
 I met with none so doubtful that I could not draw 
 from it some quite certain conclusion, even if it were 
 only this, that the proposition contained nothing cer- 
 tain. And as in pulling down an old house we gen- 
 erally save what is good of the ruins to use in build- 
 ing up the new one, so, while destroying all those 
 among my opinions which I decided to be ill-founded, 
 I made various observations and acquired many ex- 
 periences which since have been of use to me in es- 
 tablishing more certain ones. And, in addition, I 
 kept on practicing the method I had prescribed for 
 myself ; for besides taking care in general to conduct 
 all my thinking according to the rules, I reserved 
 from time to time certain hours which I spent in the 
 particular applications of it to the difficulties of
 
 METHOD] THE DISCOURSE UPON METHOD. 57 
 
 mathematics, as well as to some others which I was 
 able to render quasi-mathematical, by detaching them 
 from all the principles of other sciences which I did 
 not find to be well established, as you shall see I have 
 done in many cases which are explained in this 
 volume.* And thus, without appearing to live differ- 
 ently from those who, having no occupation but to 
 live an agreeable and innocent life, devote themselves to 
 the dissevering of pleasures from vices, and who, to 
 enjoy their leisure without ennui, engage in all forms 
 of recreation which are honorable, I was still carry- 
 ing out my design, and making more progress in the 
 knowledge of truth than perhaps I should have done 
 by reading books or mingling with men of letters. 
 
 Nevertheless these nine years rolled away before I 
 had reached any decision on the questions commonly 
 in dispute among the learned, or had begun to seek 
 foundations for a philosophy more certain than that 
 in vogue. And the example of many men of excellent 
 minds, who formerly had the same design, but who 
 seemed to me not to have succeeded in it, led me 
 to imagine it a work of so much difficulty that per- 
 haps I should not so soon have dared to undertake 
 it, if I had not learned that certain persons were 
 already spreading the rumor abroad that I had accom- 
 plished it. I cannot say upon what they based their 
 opinion ; and if I contributed anything thereto in my 
 conversation, it must have been by my confessing my 
 ignorance more openly than those are wont to do 
 who have studied a little, and perhaps also by making 
 known the reasons I had for doubting of many things 
 which others held for certain, rather than of boasting 
 
 * The Dioptrics, the Meteors, and the Geometry originally ap- 
 peared in the same volume with the Discourse on Method.
 
 58 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 of any new doctrine. But as I had too honest a soul 
 to wish to be taken for other than I was, I thought 
 I ought by all means to try to make myself worthy of 
 the reputation they had given me ; and this desire, 
 just eight years ago, made me resolve to abandon all 
 places where I might make acquaintances, and to 
 retire to this spot, in a country * where the long dura- 
 tion of the war has led to the establishment of such 
 order that the troops maintained here serve only to 
 make the people enjoy with the greater security the 
 blessings of peace, and where amid a great crowd of 
 people, very active and more interested in their own 
 affairs than curious in regard to those of others, with- 
 out lacking any of the conveniences to be found in the 
 most populous towns, I have been able to live as 
 solitary and retired as in the most remote deserts.f 
 
 * Holland, where he lived in many different villages from 1629 
 to 1649. See Kuno Fischer, Descartes, p. 207, trans. 
 
 f The remaining three parts of the Mtthode, which discuss 
 topics treated in other writings, may be found translated in the 
 work of Professor Veitch, which contains the Discourse entire.
 
 RULES FOR THE DIRECTION OF THE 
 MIND.
 
 RULES FOR THE DIRECTION OF THE 
 MIND. 
 
 RULE I. The end of studies should be the discipline 
 of the mind, such as shall enable it to pass true and solid 
 judgments upon any subject which may present itself. 
 
 Whenever men perceive a resemblance between two 
 things, they are wont to apply to both, even in re- 
 spects in which they differ, what they have found to 
 be true of either. In this way they compare, improp- 
 erly, the sciences, which consist solely of the work of 
 the mind, with the arts, which require definite practice 
 and a certain bodily aptitude. And as they see that 
 one man is not able to learn all arts at once, but that 
 he only becomes skillful in any who cultivates that 
 alone, since the same hands cannot successfully work 
 the soil and touch the lyre (and devote themselves at 
 the same time to employments so different), they 
 think that the same is true of the sciences, and, dis- 
 tinguishing them by the subjects of which they treat, 
 they believe it to be necessary to study each by itself, 
 apart from the rest. But this is a great mistake ; for 
 as the sciences all together are nothing but the human 
 intelligence, which always remains one and the same, 
 no matter what be the variety of the subjects to which 
 it applies itself, inasmuch as this variety changes its 
 nature no more than the diversity of objects upon 
 which it shines changes the nature of the sun, there is 
 no need of confining the human mind within any 
 limit. Indeed it is not the same with the knowledge 
 
 61
 
 62 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 of a truth and the practice of an art ; one truth dis- 
 covered, far from being a hindrance to us, aids us in 
 discovering another. And certainly it seems to me 
 surprising that the greater part of men study with 
 diligence plants and their virtues, the courses of the 
 stars, the transformations of metals, and a thousand 
 similar objects, while hardly anyone occupies himself 
 with intelligence or this universal science of which 
 we are speaking ; and yet, if other studies have any 
 value, it is less on their own account than for the aid 
 which they afford to this. Accordingly it is not with- 
 out purpose that we place this rule at the head of the 
 whole list, for nothing diverts us from the truth 
 more than the directing of our efforts toward particu- 
 lar ends, instead of turning them upon this single uni- 
 versal end 
 
 It must be understood, at the outset, that the 
 sciences are so bound together that it is easier to 
 learn them all than to detach any one of them from 
 the rest. If, then, one wishes seriously to search for 
 truth, he need not devote himself to a single science ; 
 they all lie close together and depend one upon 
 another 
 
 RULE II. We should occupy ourselves only with 
 those subjects in reference to which the mind is cap- 
 able of acquiring certain and indubitable knowledge. 
 .... But if we rigidly adhere to our rule there will 
 remain but few things to the study of which we can 
 devote ourselves. There exists in the sciences hardly 
 a single question upon which men of intellectual ability 
 have not held different opinions. But whenever two 
 men pass contrary judgments on the same thing, it is 
 certain that one of the two is in the wrong. More than 
 that, neither of them has the truth ; for if one of them
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 63 
 
 had a clear and precise insight into it, he could so ex- 
 hibit it to his opponent as to end the discussion by 
 compelling his conviction. We cannot, then, hope 
 to attain complete knowledge of all those things upon 
 which only probable opinions exist, because we cannot 
 without presumption expect from ourselves more than 
 others have been able to accomplish. It follows from 
 this, if we reckon rightly, that among existing sciences 
 there remain only geometry and arithmetic, to which 
 the observance of our rule would bring us 
 
 Arithmetic and geometry are much more certain 
 than the other sciences, because the objects of them 
 are in themselves so simple and so clear that they need 
 not suppose anything which experience can call in 
 question, and both proceed by a chain of consequences 
 which reason deduces one from another. They are 
 also the easiest and the clearest of all the sciences, and 
 their object is such as we desire ; for, except from 
 want of attention, it is hardly supposable that a man 
 should go astray in them. We must not be surprised, 
 however, that many minds apply themselves by prefer- 
 ence to other studies, or to philosophy. Indeed every- 
 one allows himself more freely the right to make his 
 guess if the matter be dark than if it be clear, and it 
 is much easier to have on any question some vague 
 ideas than to arrive at the truth itself on the simplest 
 of all. From all this it must be concluded, not that 
 arithmetic and geometry are the only sciences to be 
 learned, but that he who seeks the path of truth must 
 not occupy himself with any subject upon which he 
 cannot have a knowledge equal in certainty to the dem- 
 onstrations of arithmetic and geometry. 
 
 RULE III. In regard to the subject of our studies we 
 should seek, not what others may have thought about
 
 64 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 /'/, not what we ourselves may suspect to be true, but what 
 we can see clearly and with evidence, or deduce -with 
 certainty. This is the only way of arriving at scien- 
 tific truth. We never shall be mathematicians, al- 
 though we have learned by heart all the demon- 
 strations of others, if we are not able by ourselves 
 to solve every kind of problem. In like manner, 
 though we have read all the arguments of Plato and 
 Aristotle, we shall not be philosophers, if we are not 
 able to pass a solid judgment on any question what- 
 ever. In reality we should have learned, not a science, 
 
 but so much history Let us now declare the 
 
 means whereby our understanding can rise to knowl- 
 edge without fear of error. There are two such 
 means : intuition and deduction. By intuition I mean 
 not the varying testimony of the senses, nor the delu- 
 sive judgment of imagination naturally extravagant, 
 but the conception of an attentive mind so distinct and 
 so clear that no doubt remains to it with regard to that 
 which it comprehends ; or, what amounts to the same 
 thing, the self-evidencing conception of a sound and 
 attentive mind, a conception which springs from the 
 light of reason alone, and is more certain, because 
 more simple, than deduction itself, which, neverthe- 
 less, as I have said already, can be performed by any 
 man. Thus anyone can see intuitively that he exists; 
 that he thinks; that a triangle is bounded by three 
 sides, neither more nor less ; that a globe has but one 
 surface ; and so of many other things, which are more 
 numerous than one commonly thinks, because he does 
 
 not deign to attend to matters so simple It 
 
 may perhaps be asked why to intuition we add this 
 other mode of knowing, by deduction, that is to say, 
 the process which, from something of which we have
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 65 
 
 certain knowledge, draws consequences which neces- 
 sarily follow therefrom. But we are obliged to admit 
 this second step ; for there are a great many things 
 which, without being evident of themselves, neverthe- 
 less bear the mark of certainty if only they are de- 
 duced from true and incontestable principles by a con- 
 tinuous and uninterrupted movement of thought, with 
 'distinct intuition of each thing ; just as we know that 
 the last link of a long chain holds to the first, although 
 we cannot take in with one glance of the eye the in- 
 termediate links, provided that, after having run over 
 them in succession, we can recall them all, each as be- 
 ing joined to its fellows, from the first up to the last. 
 Thus we distinguish intuition from deduction, inas- 
 much as in the latter case there is conceived a certain 
 progress or succession, while it is not so in the former ; 
 and besides, deduction does not require present evi- 
 dence, like intuition, but borrows in some sort all its 
 certainty from memory ; whence it follows that primary 
 propositions, derived immediately from principles, 
 may be said to be known, according to the way we 
 view them, now by intuition, now by deduction ; al- 
 though the principles themselves can be known only by 
 intuition, the remote consequences only by deduction. 
 These are the two surest paths to knowledge ; the 
 mind ought not to follow any more than these ; it 
 ought to abandon all others as doubtful and liable to 
 lead to error : which, however, is not saying that the 
 truths of revelation are not the most certain of all our 
 knowledge ; for faith, which establishes them, is, as 
 in everything which is obscure, an act, not of the 
 intellect, but of the will, and if it have any founda- 
 tion whatever in human intelligence it is through one 
 of these two ways of which I have just spoken that
 
 66 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. PART I 
 
 it can and should be discovered, as I shall some day 
 point out with more detail. 
 
 RULE IV. Necessity of method in the search for 
 truth. The minds of men are urged on by curiosity 
 so blind that they frequently enter upon paths unknown 
 to them, with no well-grounded expectation, but 
 merely to see whether what they are seeking for may. 
 not be there, very much as those do who in the insane 
 desire to find a treasure run about continually from 
 place to place, to see whether some traveler may not 
 have left one there : in such a spirit as this almost all 
 chemists, the majority of geometers, and a good num- 
 ber of philosophers, pursue their studies. And, indeed, 
 I do not deny that they have not sometimes the good 
 fortune to hit upon some truth ; but I do not on that 
 account admit that they are the more skillful, but only 
 the more fortunate. It is better even never to dream 
 of seeking truth, than to try to find it without method ; 
 for it is certain that studies without order and con- 
 fused meditations obscure the natural lights and blind 
 the mind. Those who accustom themselves thus to 
 walk in the dark so enfeeble the mental vision that they 
 cannot bear the light of day ; a truth confirmed by ex- 
 perience, since we see men who never have occupied 
 themselves with letters judge more soundly and more 
 correctly on what presents itself to their attention than 
 those do who have passed their lives in the schools. 
 But by method I mean sure and simple rules, which, 
 rigidly observed, will prevent our ever supposing what 
 is false to be true, and will cause the mind, without 
 ever consuming its energies to no purpose, and by 
 gradually increasing its knowledge, to raise itself to 
 exact knowledge of all that it is capable of attain- 
 ing.
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 67 
 
 These two points must be well noted, not to take the 
 false for the true, and to attempt to arrive at the knowl- 
 edge of all things. Indeed, if we are ignorant of any- 
 thing of all that we are able to know, it is because we 
 have never discovered any means which can conduct 
 us to such knowledge, or because we have fallen into 
 the opposite error. But if the method shows clearly 
 how intuition must be employed to avoid taking the 
 false for the true, and how deduction necessarily 
 operates to conduct us to the knowledge of all things, 
 it will be complete in my opinion, and nothing will be 
 wanting to it, since there is no science save by intui- 
 tion and deduction, as I have said above. Neverthe- 
 less, it cannot go the length of teaching how to per- 
 form these operations, because they are the simplest 
 and first of all ; so that, if our mind does not know in 
 advance how to perform them, it cannot understand 
 any of the rules of method, however simple they may 
 be. As for other mental operations which logic at- 
 tempts to lay down rules for in aid of these two first 
 means, they are here of no utility whatever ; more 
 than that, they must be classed as obstacles ; for noth- 
 ing can be added to the pure light of reason which 
 does not in a manner obscure it. 
 
 As the usefulness of this method is such that to de- 
 vote one's self to the study of letters without it is harm- 
 ful rather than useful, I am fond of thinking that for 
 a long time superior minds, left to their natural bent, 
 have had some glimpse of it. In truth the human 
 mind possesses a certain divine element, wherein are 
 lodged the first germs of useful knowledge, which in 
 spite of neglect and the constraint of ill-conducted 
 studies bear their spontaneous fruits. Of this we have 
 proof in the easiest of all the sciences, arithmetic and
 
 68 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. PART I 
 
 geometry. Indeed it has been observed that the an- 
 cient geometers made use of a kind of analysis, which 
 they employed in the solution of problems, although 
 they begrudged to posterity the knowledge of it. And 
 do we not see flourishing a certain species of arithme- 
 tic, namely algebra, which has for its object to operate 
 upon numbers as the ancients operated upon forms? 
 But these two modes of analysis are nothing else than 
 spontaneous fruits of the principles of this natural 
 method, and I am not surprised that, when applied to 
 objects so simple, they should have proved more suc- 
 cessful than in other sciences, where greater obstacles 
 arrested their development ; still, even in those sciences, 
 had they been cultivated with diligence, they might 
 have attained a full maturity. 
 
 This is the design that I propose in this treatise. 
 Indeed, I should not attach very much importance to 
 these rules, if their only use was to solve certain prob- 
 lems with which calculators and geometers amuse them- 
 selves in their leisure moments. If this were the case, 
 what else should I be doing but to occupy myself with 
 trifles with, perhaps, more subtlety than others ? Again, 
 although in this treatise I speak often of forms and num- 
 bers, because there is no other science from which can 
 be taken examples more evident and more certain, he 
 who attentively follows my thought will see that I do 
 not in the least consider herein the ordinary mathe- 
 matics, but that I am revealing another method, of 
 which they are rather the veil than the inner reality. 
 Indeed it is to contain the first elements of human 
 reason, and to aid us in causing the truths confined 
 in any subject to come forth ; and, to speak freely, I 
 am convinced that it is superior to every other human 
 means of knowledge, because it is the origin and the
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 69 
 
 source of all truths. But I say that the mathematics 
 are the veil of this method, not that I wish to hide it 
 and wrap it up, to keep it from the vulgar ; on the con- 
 trary, I wish to clothe and adorn it in such a manner 
 that it shall be brought more within the grasp of the 
 mind. 
 
 When I began to devote myself to mathematics, I 
 had read most of the works of those who had cultivated 
 those sciences, and by preference I studied arithmetic 
 and geometry, because they were said to be the most 
 simple and, as it were, the key to all the other sciences j 
 but neither in the one nor in the other did I meet with 
 an author who completely satisfied me. I saw therein 
 divers propositions respecting numbers, the truth of 
 which, after the calculation was performed, I recog- 
 nized ; as to geometrical figures, many truths were 
 obvious at sight, and others were inferred by analogy ; 
 but it did not appear to me to be said with sufficient 
 clearness to the mind why things were as they were 
 shown to be, and by what means the discovery of 
 them was reached. Accordingly, I was not more 
 surprised that able and learned men should abandon 
 these sciences, when they had hardly blossomed out, as 
 being puerile and useless forms of knowledge, than 
 that they should be reluctant to devote themselves to 
 them as being difficult and embarrassing studies. In- 
 deed there is nothing more idle than to occupy one's 
 self with numbers and imaginary forms, if one means 
 to stop with the knowledge of such trifles ; and it is 
 idle to apply one's self to the superficial demonstra- 
 tions of them which chance more frequently than art 
 has brought to light to apply one's self thereto, I 
 mean, with so much diligence that one comes to dis- 
 like, in a manner, to make use of his own reason ; to
 
 70 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. PART I 
 
 say nothing of the extreme difficulty of disentangling, 
 by that method, from the confusion of the numbers in 
 which they are involved, new complications which 
 may present themselves. 
 
 But when, on the other hand, I asked myself why 
 was it then that the earliest philosophers would admit 
 to the study of wisdom only those who had studied 
 mathematics, as if this science were the easiest of all 
 and the one most necessary for preparing and disci- 
 plining the mind to comprehend the more advanced, I 
 suspected that they had knowledge of a certain math- 
 ematical science different from that of our times. 
 Not that I believe that they had a perfect knowl- 
 edge of it ; their insensate transports and their religi- 
 ous sacrifices on occasion of the most trivial discoveries 
 show how much in their infancy these studies then 
 were. I am not more impressed by the eulogies which 
 historians lavished on some of their inventions, be- 
 cause, in spite of their simplicity, it is well understood 
 that the ignorant and easily astonished multitude had 
 praised them as prodigies. But I am persuaded that 
 certain primitive germs of truth which nature has 
 implanted in the human intellect, which we smother 
 in ourselves by much reading, and by receiving into 
 our minds errors so many and various, had, in that 
 simple, naive antiquity, so much vigor and vitality 
 that men enlightened by that light of reason, which 
 made them prefer virtue to pleasures, the honorable to 
 the useful, although they might not know the reason 
 of this preference, formed true ideas both of philos- 
 ophy and of mathematics, although they could not at 
 that time advance those sciences to perfection. 
 
 I believe I find some traces of these true math- 
 ematics in Pappus and Diophantes, who, although they
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 71 
 
 are not of extreme antiquity, lived nevertheless in 
 times long preceding ours. But I willingly believe 
 that these writers themselves, by a culpable ruse, sup- 
 pressed the knowledge of them ; like some artisans 
 who conceal their secret, they feared, perhaps, that the 
 ease and simplicity of their method, if become popu- 
 lar, would diminish its importance, and they preferred 
 to make themselves admired by leaving to us, as the 
 product of their art, certain barren truths deduced 
 with subtlety, rather than to teach us that art itself, the 
 knowledge of which would end our admiration. In- 
 deed, certain men of great intellect in this age have 
 attempted to disclose this method ; for it appears to 
 be nothing else than what is called by the barbarous 
 name of algebra, which needs only to be disengaged 
 from that crowd of signs and those unintelligible 
 figures which overwhelm it, to have imparted to it that 
 clearness and supreme facility which, in our view, 
 ought to characterize it as a branch of true mathe- 
 matics. 
 
 When these reflections had withdrawn me from the 
 special study of arithmetic and geometry, with a view 
 to summon myself to the search for a science of math- 
 ematics in general, I asked myself, in the first place, 
 what precisely was the meaning of this word mathe- 
 matics, and why arithmetic and geometry only, and 
 not also astronomy, music, optics, mechanics, and so 
 many other sciences, should be considered as forming 
 a part of it ; for it is not enough here to know the 
 etymology of the word. In reality the word mathe- 
 matics meaning nothing but science, those which I 
 have just named have as much right as geometry to 
 be called mathematics; and nevertheless there is no 
 one, however little instructed, who cannot distinguish
 
 72 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 at once what belongs to mathematics, properly so 
 called, from what belongs to the other sciences. But on 
 reflecting attentively upon these things, I discovered 
 that all the sciences which have for their end investi- 
 gations concerning order and measure, are related to 
 mathematics, it being of small importance whether 
 this measure be sought in numbers, forms, stars, 
 sounds, or any other object ; that, accordingly, there 
 ought to exist a general science which should explain 
 all that can be known about order and measure, con- 
 sidered independently of any application to a particu- 
 lar subject, and that, indeed, this science has its own 
 proper name, consecrated by long usage, to wit, 
 mathematics; since it contains that in consideration of 
 which the other sciences are said to form a part of 
 mathematics. And a proof that it far surpasses in 
 facility and importance the sciences which depend 
 upon it is that it embraces at once all the objects to 
 which these are devoted and a great many others 
 besides ; and consequently, if it contain any difficul- 
 ties, these exist in the rest, which have themselves 
 the peculiar ones arising from their particular subject- 
 matter, and which do not exist for the general science. 
 Now, since everybody knows the name of this 
 science, since the object of it is conceived without 
 even thinking much upon it, how comes it about that 
 the knowledge of other sciences, which depend upon 
 this, is painfully sought, and that no one puts himself 
 to the trouble of studying this science itself? I should 
 certainly be surprised, if I did not know that every- 
 body regarded it as being very easy, and if I had not 
 long ago observed that the human mind, neglecting 
 what it believes to be easy, is always in haste to run 
 after what is novel and advanced. As for me, who
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 73 
 
 am conscious of my weakness, I resolved, in the pur- 
 suit of knowledge, constantly to observe such an 
 order that, beginning always with the simplest and 
 the easiest branches, I should never take a step in 
 advance to pass on to others, so long as I thought 
 anything was still to be desired in respect to the first. 
 That is why I have cultivated, up to this day, as well 
 as I was able, this universal mathematical science, so 
 that I believe I am able to devote myself in the future 
 to sciences more advanced, with no fear of my efforts 
 
 being premature 
 
 RULE V. The whole method consists in the order 
 and arrangement of the subjects upon which the mind 
 is to exert itself with the view to attain truth. To 
 follow it, // is necessary to reduce, by degrees, compli- 
 cated and obscure propositions to the most simple, and 
 to proceed again from the intuition of these last, in 
 order to arrive, in the same gradual manner, at the 
 knowledge of others. The perfection of method con- 
 sists in this alone, and this rule must be observed as 
 faithfully by him who would enter into science as the 
 thread of Theseus must be held by one who would 
 penetrate the labyrinth. But many do not reflect on 
 what method directs them to do, or else ignore it com- 
 pletely, or take it for granted that they have no need 
 of it ; and they often discuss the most difficult 
 subjects with so little order that they may be 
 likened to one who would spring to the top of a high 
 building at a bound, paying no attention to the stair- 
 way which leads up to it, or not perceiving that there 
 is any. In this way the astrologers proceed who, with- 
 out knowing the nature of the stars, without even hav- 
 ing carefully observed their motions, hope to be able 
 to determine their influences. In the same way pro-
 
 74 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 ceed many who study mechanics without understand- 
 ing physics, and undertake in a haphazard way to 
 make new machines ; and most philosophers do the 
 same thing who, neglecting the study of facts, imagine 
 that truth will spring out of their brains, like Minerva 
 from the head of Jupiter 
 
 RULE VI. To distinguish the simpler things from 
 those which are more complex, it is necessary, in every 
 series of objects, or in every case where ive have deduced 
 some truths from others, to take note of the simplest of 
 all, and to observe how all the rest stand removed from 
 this, whether more or less or equally. 
 
 Although this rule may appear to teach nothing new, 
 it nevertheless contains the whole secret of the method, 
 and there is none more useful in this entire treatise. 
 It teaches us that all things may be arranged in differ- 
 ent series, not in so far as they belong to some kind of 
 existence (a division which finds place in the categor- 
 ies of philosophers), but in so far as they can be under- 
 stood one by means of another, so that, when we en- 
 counter a difficulty, we can tell whether it concerns 
 things in which it is for our advantage to examine 
 those preceding, up to the first, and in what order 
 this must be done. But in order to do this rightly, it 
 must be observed at once that in view of the applica- 
 tion of our rule, which does not consider things in 
 isolation, but compares them one with another, in order 
 to understand one by means of another, they maybe 
 called either absolute or relative. I call absolute what- 
 ever is a simple, indecomposable element of the sub- 
 ject* under consideration ; as, for example, all that is 
 viewed as being independent, viz., cause, simple, univer- 
 sal, one, equal, similar, right, etc. ; and I say that what- 
 ever is more simple is whatever is more easy to compre-
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 75 
 
 head, and what we might make use of in the solution 
 of problems. I call relative whatever is of the same 
 nature, or at least by one side is joined to the absolute, 
 so that it can be traced to it and deduced from it. 
 But this term includes also certain other things which 
 I call relations, such as all that is embraced under the 
 terms dependent, viz., effect, composite, particular, 
 multiple, unequal, dissimilar, oblique, etc. These rela- 
 tions are removed from the absolute in proportion as 
 they contain the greater number of relations subordi- 
 nate to them relations which our rule recommends 
 that we distinguish one from another, and take note 
 of, in their connections and mutual order, so that by 
 proceeding step by step through all we may be able 
 to arrive in due succession at that which is most ab- 
 solute. 
 
 But the whole art consists in seeking always for the 
 most absolute. In reality, certain things seen from 
 one point of view are more absolute than as seen from 
 another ; and looked at in another way, they are more 
 relative. Thus the universal is more absolute than 
 the particular, because its nature is more simple ; but 
 at the same time it can be said to be more relative, be- 
 cause it requires individuals for its existence. More- 
 over, certain things are indeed more absolute than 
 others, but not the most absolute of all. If we regard 
 individuals, the species is absolute ; if we regard the 
 genus, it is relative. In mensurable bodies, extension 
 is the absolute ; but, in extension, it is length, etc. 
 Indeed, to make it more apparent that we are con- 
 sidering things here, not in respect to their individual 
 nature, but in respect to the series in which we place 
 them in order to understand one by means of another, 
 we have designedly put in the number of things abso-
 
 76 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 lute, cause and equality, although by their nature they 
 are relatives ; for, in the language of philosophers, 
 cause and effect are two correlative terms. Neverthe- 
 less, if we wish to know what effect is, we must first 
 know what cause is, and not effect before cause. So 
 things equal correspond to one another ; but to know 
 the unequal, it must be compared with the equal. 
 
 It is to be observed, in the second place, that there 
 are a few simple necessary elements that we can per- 
 ceive by themselves, independently of all others, I do 
 not say at first, but by the aid of experience and the 
 lighjt which is in us. Also I say that it is necessary 
 to observe these with care ; for it is these which we 
 call the most simple of each series. All the rest can 
 be perceived only by deducing them from these, 
 whether immediately and proximately, or after one or 
 two conclusions or a greater number, conclusions the 
 number of which it is necessary still to note, in order 
 to know whether they are removed by more or fewer 
 steps from the first and simplest proposition ; such 
 throughout must be the concatenation, which is to 
 produce that orderly succession of problems to 
 which every inquiry methodically conducted must 
 be reduced. But inasmuch as it is not easy to 
 recall all these steps, and it is less important to retain 
 them in memory than to be able by a certain penetra- 
 tion of mind to discern them, it is necessary to train 
 the mind so that it shall be able to retrace them when 
 there is need. But I have discovered that the best 
 way to succeed in this is to accustom ourselves to re- 
 flect with attention on the least things which we have 
 previously ascertained. 
 
 Let us observe, in the third place, that it is not 
 necessary to begin our investigation by an inquiry into
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 77 
 
 difficult matters ; but before undertaking a problem, 
 to take at random and without deliberation the first 
 truths which present themselves, to see whether from 
 these others may not be deduced, and from these 
 latter others still, and so on. This done, we must 
 reflect attentively on the truths already found, and 
 carefully observe why we were able to discover some 
 before the rest, and more easily, and note what they 
 are. Thus, when we approach any question whatever, 
 we shall know with what inquiry it will be necessary 
 to begin. For example, I see that the number 6 is 
 the double of 3 ; I seek the double of 6, that is to say 
 12 ; I seek next the double of this, that is to say 24, 
 and of that, or 48 ; and thence I deduce, which is not 
 difficult, that there is the same proportion between 3 
 and 6 as between 6 and 1 2, and between 1 2 and 24, etc., 
 and thus the numbers 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, are in a continu- 
 ous proportion. Although all these things are so sim- 
 ple that they seem almost puerile, they explain to me, 
 when I reflect upon them attentively, how complicated 
 are all questions having to do with proportions, and 
 with the relations of things, and in what order their 
 solution is to be sought, which contains the whole 
 science of the pure mathematics 
 
 RULE VII. In order to make knowledge complete, it 
 is necessary the mind should run over, in a movement un- 
 interrupted atid orderly, all matters pertaining to the end 
 in view, and then sum them up in a methodical and 
 sufficient enumeration. 
 
 The observance of this rule is necessary to enable 
 one to place among certainties those truths which, as 
 we have said above, are not immediately deduced from 
 self-evident principles. They are reached, indeed, by 
 means of a train of consequences so long that it is not
 
 78 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 easy to retrace the path we have followed. Accord- 
 ingly we say that the faculty of memory must be aided 
 by a constant effort of thought. If, for example, 
 after various operations, I discover the relation be- 
 tween the quantities A and B, then between B and C, 
 next between C and D, finally between D and E, I do 
 not thereby perceive the relation between A and E, 
 and I cannot with certainty infer it from the relations 
 known, unless my memory represents them all to me. 
 So 1 run through the series in such a way that imagi- 
 nation at the same time sees one and passes on to the 
 next, until I can go from first to last with such rapidity 
 that, almost without the aid of memory, I can seize 
 the whole at one glance. This method, while relieving 
 the memory, corrects the sluggishness of the mind and 
 enlarges its range. I add that the movement of the 
 mind must not be interrupted ; often those who 
 try to draw conclusions too rapidly from remote prin- 
 ciples are unable to follow the chain of intermediate 
 deductions with sufficient care to prevent some escap- 
 ing them. And yet, if one consequence, though it be 
 the least important of all, has been forgotten, the chain 
 is broken, and the certainty of the conclusion is 
 shaken. 
 
 I say further that knowledge needs enumeration to 
 complete it. Indeed, the other precepts are of use in 
 solving an infinity of problems ; but enumeration alone 
 can enable us to pass, upon any subject which may en- 
 gage our attention, a safe and well-founded judgment, 
 in consequence of its allowing absolutely nothing to 
 escape, and having certain evidence in respect to 
 everything. But enumeration, or induction, here 
 means careful and exact scrutiny of all that relates to 
 the question proposed. But this scrutiny must be
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 79 
 
 such that we can conclude with certainty that we have 
 omitted nothing by oversight. When, then,. we have 
 employed it, and still the difficulty is not cleared up, \ve 
 shall be at least so much the wiser that we shall know 
 that the solution cannot be reached by any of the 
 ways known to us ; and if perchance what may often 
 enough happen we have been able to traverse all the 
 paths open to man for arriving at truth, we shall be 
 able to say with assurance that the solution surpasses 
 the range of human intelligence. It must be observed 
 further that by sufficient enumeration or induction we 
 understand the means which conduct us to truth more 
 surely than any other, except intuition pure and sim- 
 ple. Indeed, if the case is such that we cannot take 
 it back to intuition, we must not rely upon syllogistic 
 forms, but upon induction alone. For in all cases 
 when we have deduced propositions immediately one 
 from another, if the deduction has been evident, they 
 will be traceable to a true intuition. But if we deduce 
 a proposition from numerous other propositions, 
 disconnected and multiform, it frequently happens 
 that our intellectual capacity is not such that it 
 can take in the whole at one view ; in this case we 
 must be satisfied with the certainty of the induction. 
 Just as when we are unable at one glance to take in 
 all the links of a long chain, yet if we have seen that 
 each is linked to the next, this warrants us in saying 
 
 that the first is joined to the last 
 
 But in some cases this enumeration must be com- 
 plete, in others distinct; in others it need have neither 
 of these two characters, but, as I have said, it must be 
 sufficient. For example, if I wish to prove how many 
 corporeal or sensible existences there are, I shall not 
 say that there is such a number, neither more nor
 
 8o THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 less, until I certainly know that I have taken every 
 one into account and distinguished each from the 
 others. But if I wish, by the same method, to prove 
 that the rational soul is not corporeal, it will not be 
 necessary for the enumeration to be complete ; but 
 it will be sufficient if I collect all bodies under certain 
 classes, and show that the soul cannot belong to any 
 one of them. If, finally, I wish to demonstrate by 
 enumeration that the superficies of a circle is greater 
 than that of any other figure of equal perimeter, I 
 shall not pass in review all the figures, but I shall 
 content myself with the proof of what I lay down 
 concerning certain figures, and conclude the same by 
 induction for all the rest. I said further that the 
 enumeration should be methodical, because there is 
 no better way of avoiding the defects of which we 
 have spoken than to introduce order into our in- 
 quiries, and because, if we had to seek by itself each 
 thing related to the principal object of our inquiry, 
 it would frequently happen that a whole lifetime 
 would be insufficient for it, whether on account of the 
 number of the objects or the frequent recurrence of 
 the same objects. But if we arrange all things in the 
 best order, they will be seen most frequently to form 
 fixed and determinate classes, of which it will be 
 sufficient to know one only, or to know this rather 
 than that, or simply something of one of them ; and 
 at least we shall not have to retrace our steps to no 
 purpose. This method is so good that by means of 
 it one may in the end attain without difficulty, and in 
 a short time, a knowledge which at the start might 
 have seemed immense. 
 
 Finally our last three propositions must not be sepa- 
 rated, but must be kept all together before the mind,
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 81 
 
 because they contribute equally to the perfection of 
 the method. It matters little which we place first ; 
 and if we do not here develop them further, it is be- 
 cause that in the remainder of this treatise we have 
 scarcely anything else to do than to explain them, 
 by showing the particular application of the general 
 principles we have just laid down. 
 
 RULE VIII. If in the course of our investigations 
 anything presents itself which the mind cannot perfectly 
 comprehend., we must stop at that point and not examine 
 what comes next, but spare ourselves fruitless labor. 
 
 This rule follows necessarily from reasons which 
 support the second. Yet it must not be regarded 
 as containing nothing new for the advancement of 
 knowledge, although it might seem merely to dissuade 
 us from the pursuit of certain things ; nor that it 
 teaches no truth whatever, because it appears merely 
 to warn students not to lose their time, by almost the 
 same motive as the second. But those who perfectly 
 comprehend the seven preceding rules can by this 
 learn how in every science it is possible for them to 
 reach a point beyond which there remains nothing 
 further to be desired. He, in fact, who in the solution 
 of a difficulty has followed exactly the preceding rules, 
 warned by this to stop somewhere, will understand 
 that there is no means of attaining what he is seeking; 
 and that not through any defect of his mind, but on 
 account of the nature of the difficulty, or of our human 
 limitations. But the recognition of this fact is no less 
 a part of true knowledge than whatever throws light 
 on the nature of things, and surely it is no proof of a 
 good mind to urge its curiosity beyond this point. 
 
 Let us illustrate all this by one or two examples. 
 If a man versed only in mathematics is investi-
 
 82 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 gating the line called in dioptrics the anaclastic^ in 
 which parallel rays are refracted in such a manner 
 that after refraction they all meet in one point, he 
 will easily see, according to the fifth and sixth rules, 
 that the determination of this line depends on the 
 relation of the angles of refraction to the angles of 
 incidence. But when he finds himself unable to make 
 this investigation, which does not come within the 
 jurisdiction of mathematics, but of physics, he ought 
 to stop there, where it would be of no avail to seek 
 the solution of the difficulty from philosophers and 
 from experience. In accepting the opinions of others 
 he would violate the third rule. Besides, the case is 
 composite and relative ; whereas it is only in things 
 simple and absolute that we ought to accept experi- 
 ence (as authority), a position we shall make good in 
 its proper place. Further, it will be to no purpose for 
 him to suppose among these various angles a relation 
 which he shall suspect to be the true one ; that would 
 not be seeking the anaclastic, but merely a line which 
 might tally with his supposition. 
 
 But if a man knowing something besides mathe- 
 matics, desiring to know the truth, according to the 
 first rule, about everything which may present itself 
 to him, has met with the same difficulty, he will go on 
 further, and will find out that the relation between 
 the angles of incidence and the angles of refraction 
 depends upon their variation occasioned by the vary- 
 ing of the media ; that this variation in its turn depends 
 on the medium, because the ray of light penetrates 
 through the whole of the transparent body ; he will 
 see that this property of thus penetrating a body re- 
 quires the nature of light to be understood ; that 
 finally, to understand the nature of light, it is neces-
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 83 
 
 sary to know what in general a natural power is, the 
 last and most absolute term of this whole series of 
 inquiries. After he has seen all these propositions 
 clearly, by the aid of intuition, he will go back over 
 the same steps again, according to the fifth rule ; and if 
 at the second step he cannot at once comprehend the 
 nature of light, he will enumerate, according to the 
 seventh rule, all the other natural powers, in order 
 that through the knowledge of one of them he may 
 be able at least to deduce by analogy the knowledge 
 of the one of which he is ignorant. This done, he 
 will inquire how the ray of light traverses a perfectly 
 transparent medium, and, thus following the order of 
 the propositions, he will at last arrive at the anaclas- 
 tic itself, which many philosophers, it is true, have 
 hitherto sought in vain, but which, in our opinion, 
 presents no difficulty to him who will avail himself of 
 our method. 
 
 But let us give the noblest example of all. Let a 
 man propose to himself, as a problem, the investiga- 
 tion of all the truths of the knowledge of which 
 the human mind is capable, a problem which, in my 
 opinion, all those who are in earnest in their desire 
 to attain wisdom, ought, at least once in their lives, 
 to propose to themselves ; he will find, by the help of 
 the rules I have given, that the first thing to be 
 known is intelligence itself, since upon this depends 
 the knowledge of all other things, and not recipro- 
 cally. Next investigating what immediately follows 
 the knowledge of pure intellect, he will pass in re- 
 view all the other means of knowing which we pos- 
 sess, intellect excepted ; he will find that there are 
 only two, imagination and the senses. He will then 
 give his whole attention to the examination and dis-
 
 84 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 tinction of these three means of knowing ; and per- 
 ceiving that, properly speaking, truth and error can 
 exist only in the intellectual activity by itself, and 
 that the other two modes of knowing furnish only 
 the occasions for its exercise, he will carefully avoid 
 all that can lead him astray, and he will consider all 
 the ways open to man for arriving at truth, in order 
 to follow the right one. But these are not so numer- 
 ous that he cannot easily discover them all by a suffi- 
 cient enumeration 
 
 But there is here no question more important to be 
 settled than to know what human knowledge is, and 
 how far it extends,* two things which we combine in 
 one and the same question, which must be considered 
 before anything else, according to the rules given 
 above. There is here a question which a man must 
 examine once in his life, if he love the truth, though 
 but little, because this inquiry contains the whole 
 method and, as it were, the true instrument of science. 
 Nothing appears to me more absurd than boldly to 
 argue concerning the mysteries of nature, the influ- 
 ence of the stars, the secrets of the future, without 
 once having raised the question whether the human 
 mind is competent to these things. And it should 
 not seem to us a difficult and arduous task thus to fix 
 the limits of our mind of which we have conscious- 
 ness, when we are deliberating about passing a judg- 
 ment upon things external to us, and which are com- 
 pletely foreign to us. It is not a labor any greater 
 than to seek to embrace in thought the objects which 
 
 * Cf. Kuno Fischer, Descartes and his School, p. 495 trans. ; 
 Locke's Essay Upon the Human Understanding, Epistle to the 
 Reader; Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Introduction.
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 85 
 
 this world includes, in order to understand how each 
 of them may be comprehended by our mind. In re- 
 ality there is nothing so multiform and so scattered 
 which cannot be brought within certain limits, and re- 
 duced to a certain number of main divisions, by means 
 of the enumeration we have described. To make trial 
 of it, in the question above proposed, we shall divide 
 into two parts all that relates thereto ; it is relative, 
 in fact, either to us, who have the capacity of know- 
 ing ; or to things, which may be known : these two 
 points shall be treated separately. And at the out- 
 set we observe that in us intellect alone is capable of 
 knowledge, but that it may be hindered or helped by 
 three other faculties ; to wit, imagination, the senses, 
 and memory. It is necessary then to see succes- 
 sively, wherein these faculties can harm us, in order 
 to avoid it, and wherein they can serve us, in order to 
 profit by it. This first point shall be completely 
 treated by a sufficient enumeration, according as the 
 following rule shall make it appear. 
 
 It is then necessary to pass to objects themselves, and 
 to consider them only in so far as our intelligence can 
 deal with them. Under this relation we divide them into 
 things simple and things complex or composite. The 
 simple can be only spiritual or corporeal, or spiritual 
 and corporeal at the same time. The composite are of 
 two sorts; the one the mind discovers before it is able 
 to say anything positive of them ; it constructs the 
 other itself, a process which shall be set forth more at 
 length in the twelfth rule, where it will be shown that 
 error can be found only in things which the intellect has 
 put together. Let us also divide these last into two 
 species, those which are deduced from things the most
 
 86 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 simple, which are known by themselves ; to which we 
 devote the next book * : and those which presuppose 
 others, which experience teaches us are essentially com- 
 posite ; the third book shall be entirely devoted to 
 them. But in this entire treatise we shall attempt to 
 follow with exactness and make plain the paths which 
 can conduct man to the discovery of truth, so that the 
 most ordinary mind, provided it shall be profoundly 
 penetrated with this method, shall see that truth is in- 
 terdicted to him no more than to anybody else, and that 
 if he is ignorant of anything it is not the fault of his 
 mind or of his capacity. f But whenever he shall desire 
 to know anything, either he will discover it at once, 
 or, perhaps, he will find that his knowledge depends 
 on an experiment which it is not within his power to 
 make ; and then he will not blame his mind because 
 it is forced to arrest its activity so soon ; or, finally, 
 he will perceive that the thing sought lies beyond the 
 range of human intellect, and, in that case, he will not 
 think himself more ignorant, because to have arrived 
 at this result is in itself a piece of knowledge worth 
 as much as another. 
 
 RULE IX. // is necessary to direct the whole energy of 
 the mind upon things which are easiest and least impor- 
 tant, and to hold it there for a long time until the habit is 
 acquired of seeing truth clearly and distinctly. 
 
 * The second and third books probably were never written. 
 
 j- Cf. Lord Bacon's estimate of the value of his own method. 
 " Our method of discovering the sciences is such as to leave little 
 to the acuteness and strength of wit, and indeed rather to level 
 wit and intellect. For as in the drawing of a straight line or ac- 
 curate circle by the hand, much depends upon its steadiness and 
 practice, but if a ruler or compass be employed there is little occa- 
 sion for either ; so it is with our method. " Novum Organum, 
 bk. i, 61.
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 87 
 
 Having set forth the two mental operations, intui- 
 tion and deduction, the only ones which can conduct 
 us to knowledge, we shall continue to explain, in this 
 rule and the next, the means by which we can become 
 skillful in the performance of these processes, and at 
 the same time cultivate the two principal talents of 
 the mind, viz., perspicacity, through the distinct en- 
 visaging of each thing, and sagacity, through the skill- 
 ful deducing of one thing from another. The way in 
 which we use our eyes is sufficient to make us under- 
 stand how to employ intuition. He who is bent on 
 taking in many things at one look sees nothing dis- 
 tinctly ; in the same way, he who, in one act of 
 thought, would attend to many objects at once, con- 
 fuses his mind. On the other hand, workmen who 
 are employed on delicate operations, and who are ac- 
 customed to look attentively at each point in particular, 
 acquire, by practice, the ability to see the smallest and 
 finest objects. Likewise those who do not expend 
 their thought upon a thousand different things, but 
 who employ its whole energy in the consideration of 
 the simplest and easiest, acquire great quickness of 
 apprehension 
 
 RULE X. In order that the mind may acquire facility, 
 it must be exercised in finding out things which others 
 have already discovered, and in practicing in a methodical 
 way even the commonest arts, especially those which exhibit 
 order or require it. 
 
 I confess that I was born with such a mental dispo- 
 sition that my greatest happiness in studies consisted 
 not in following the arguments of others, but in finding 
 them out for myself. This disposition of itself, while 
 I was still young, interested me in scientific studies ; 
 and whenever any book promised me by its title a
 
 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 new discovery, before going on to read it I tried 
 whether my own natural sagacity might not be able 
 to conduct me to something similar, and I took great 
 care that too much reading should not beguile me of 
 this innocent pleasure. I succeeded in this so many 
 times that I was conscious at last of reaching truth 
 no longer as other men do, after blind and uncertain 
 efforts, rather by a stroke of good luck than by art, 
 but long experience taught me certain fixed rules, which 
 aid me wonderfully, and of which I have reaped the 
 advantage in finding out many truths. Accordingly 
 I have practiced this method with diligence, persuaded 
 that from the beginning I have followed the most use- 
 ful course. 
 
 But inasmuch as all minds are not equally qualified 
 to discover truth by themselves atone, this rule 
 teaches us that one must not occupy himself at the 
 start with the most difficult and arduous subjects, 
 but begin with arts the least important and the most 
 simple, those, above all, where order reigns, such as 
 the trades of the maker of tapestry, of the weaver, of 
 the women who embroider or make lace ; such as, 
 also, combinations of numbers, and everything which 
 relates to arithmetic : as many other similar arts, 
 which as wonderfully exercise the mind, provided we 
 are not indebted to others for the knowledge of them, 
 but discover them for ourselves. Indeed, while they 
 contain nothing obscure, and are perfectly within the 
 range of human intelligence, they make distinctly 
 manifest to us innumerable methods, diverse from each 
 other, and nevertheless regular. But it is in the rig- 
 orous observance of sequence that almost all human 
 sagacity consists. Accordingly we have enjoined the 
 necessity of examining these things methodically ; but
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 89 
 
 method, in these subordinate arts, is nothing else 
 than the constant observance of the order which 
 exists in them, or which a happy invention has put 
 there 
 
 It is necessary, then, to make a beginning with easy 
 things, but with method, in order to accustom our- 
 selves to penetrate by means of open and familiar 
 paths, as if in sport, to the innermost truth of these 
 things. By this means we shall, insensibly and in 
 a shorter time than we might expect, become capa- 
 ble of deducing with equal facility from self-evident 
 principles a great number of propositions which might 
 seem to us very difficult and very complicated. Many 
 persons, perhaps, are surprised that, while we are 
 considering the means whereby we are enabled to 
 deduce truths one from another, we omit to speak of 
 the rules of the logicians, who think to direct human 
 reason by prescribing to it certain formulas of reason- 
 ing so conclusive that the mind which trusts to their 
 guidance, although it may dispense with giving close 
 attention to the deduction itself, is yet enabled by 
 the form alone to reach a certain conclusion. We 
 observe however that truth often escapes the confining 
 forms, while those who employ them remain bound 
 by them. This does not happen so often to those 
 who do not make use of them, and our experience 
 proves that the most subtle sophisms deceive only 
 the sophists, almost never those who use their simple 
 reason. 
 
 Accordingly, fearing that reason may give us the 
 slip when we are on the search for truth in some 
 matter, we reject all these formulas as opposed to 
 our design, and collect together only what will help 
 us in keeping our thought attentive, as we shall
 
 go THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 show in the sequel. But to produce the more com- 
 plete conviction that this syllogistic art is of no use 
 in the discovery of truth, it needs only to be observed 
 that logicians cannot form a syllogism yielding a truth 
 in its conclusion without having the matter of it 
 beforehand, that is to say, without having known in 
 advance the truth which the syllogism develops. 
 Whence it follows that this form can yield them 
 nothing new ; and, therefore, that the common logic is 
 entirely useless to him who wishes to discover truth, 
 but is of advantage only in setting forth more readily 
 to others truths already known, and, therefore, it 
 should be transferred from philosophy to rhetoric. 
 
 RULE XI. When by intuition we have assured our- 
 selves of the truth of certain simple propositions, if we 
 are to proceed to draw conclusions therefrom, it is of no 
 use to go on without arresting for a moment the progress 
 of our thought, hi order to reflect upon the mutual rela- 
 tions of these truths, and to bring as many as possible of 
 these relations before the mind in one view : by this 
 means we give to our knowledge more certainty and to 
 our thought greater breadth. 
 
 Here is the place to explain more clearly what we 
 have said of intuition in the third and seventh rules. 
 In the one we opposed it to deduction, in the other 
 merely to enumeration, which we defined the collect- 
 ing together of many distinct things, while the simple 
 operation of deducing of one thing from another was 
 accomplished by intuition. This must be the case ; 
 for we require two conditions for intuition, to wit, that 
 the proposition should appear clear and distinct, next 
 that it be comprehended as a whole at once and not 
 part by part. Deduction, on the contrary, if we are 
 considering its formation, as in the third rule, does
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 91 
 
 not appear to operate instantaneously, but it implies 
 a certain movement of the mind inferring one thing 
 from another ; accordingly in that rule we were right 
 in distinguishing it from intuition. But if we con- 
 sider it as accomplished, in accordance with what we 
 said in the seventh rule, then it no longer designates 
 a movement, but the limit of a movement. Accord- 
 ingly, let us suppose that it [the deduction] is per- 
 ceived by intuition when it is simple and clear, but 
 not when it is manifold and involved. Then we gave 
 it the name enumeration and induction, because it 
 cannot be comprehended in one whole at a glance of 
 the mind, but its certainty depends in some measure 
 on the memory, whose function is to hold in the mind 
 the judgments passed on each of the parts in order 
 that a single judgment may be concluded from 
 them. 
 
 All these distinctions are necessary for the under- 
 standing of this rule. The ninth having treated of 
 intuition, and the tenth of enumeration, the present 
 rule shows how these two rules aid and complete each 
 other, so that they seem to make but one, by virtue 
 of a movement of thought which considers attentively 
 each object and at the same time passes on to others. 
 We find in this the double advantage, on the one 
 hand, of knowing with more certainty the conclusion 
 with which we are concerned, and, on the other, of 
 rendering the mind more skillful in the discovery of 
 others. Indeed the memory upon which we said de- 
 pends the certainty of conclusions too complex for 
 intuition to take in at a single view ; the memory, 
 feeble and wandering by nature, needs to be renewed 
 and reenforced by this continual and repeated move- 
 ment of thought. Thus when, after many operations,
 
 92 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 I have come to recognize the relation between, a first 
 and a second quantity, between a second and a third, 
 between a third and a fourth, finally between a fourth 
 and a fifth, I do not thereby foresee the relation of the 
 first to the fifth, and I cannot deduce it from the rela- 
 tions already known without recalling them all. It 
 is therefore necessary that my thought run over them 
 anew, until at last I am able to pass from the first to 
 the last so quickly as to seem, almost without the aid 
 of memory, to embrace the whole in a single intuition. 
 This method, as everyone knows, corrects the slug- 
 gishness of the mind, and also increases its grasp. But 
 it must be noticed further that the usefulness of this 
 rule consists principally in this, that by accustoming 
 ourselves to reflect upon the mutual dependence of 
 simple propositions, we acquire facility in distinguish- 
 ing at a glance the more or the less relative and per- 
 ceiving the steps by which they are to be brought 
 back to the absolute 
 
 RULE XII. Finally, all the resources of intellect, of 
 imagination, of the senses, of memory, must be employed, 
 in order to have a distinct intuition of simple propositions, 
 to compare suitably w/iat is sought with what is known, 
 and to find out the things which are thus to be compared 
 together; in a word, no one of the means of knowledge 
 with which the human mind is provided, is to be neglected. 
 
 This rule includes all that has been said above, and 
 shows in a general way what is to be particularly ex- 
 plained. For the attainment of knowledge, only two 
 things are to be taken into account: we who know, and 
 the objects which are to be known. There are within 
 us four faculties which we can employ in knowing; the 
 intellect, the imagination, the senses, and the memory. 
 The intellect alone is capable of conceiving truth. It
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 93 
 
 must, nevertheless, avail itself of the imagination, the 
 senses, and the memory, in order not to leave unem- 
 ployed any of our means of knowledge. So far as 
 concerns the objects themselves, three things only are 
 to be considered : first, we must see what presents 
 itself to us spontaneously; then how one thing is 
 known by means of another ; finally, what things are 
 deduced from others, and from what they are deduced. 
 This enumeration seems to me to be complete. It 
 embraces all that the faculties of man can attain. . . . 
 
 It is to be conceived, first of all, that the external 
 senses, in so far as they form part of the body, although 
 we direct them to objects by our own action that is 
 to say, by means of local movement never perceive 
 except passively ; that is to say, in the same way 
 as wax receives the impression of a seal. And it must 
 not be supposed that this comparison is to be taken 
 merely in the way of analogy, but it is to be conceived 
 that the external form of the body, in perceiving, is 
 really modified by the object in the same way that the 
 surface of the wax is modified by the seal. This is 
 true not only when we touch a body in respect to 
 its figure, hardness, roughness, etc., but also when 
 through contact we perceive heat and cold. The 
 same is true of the other senses 
 
 In the second place, it is to be conceived that at the 
 instant when the external sense is set in motion by 
 the object, the form which it receives is borne to an- 
 other part of the body which is called the common 
 sense; and that instantaneously, and without their 
 being a real passing of anything from one point to an- 
 other ; just as, while I am writing, I know that at the 
 instant when each letter is traced upon the paper, not 
 only the point of the pen is in motion, but also that it
 
 94 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 cannot receive the least motion which is not simulta- 
 neously communicated to the entire pen, the upper 
 part of which describes in the air the same figures^ 
 although nothing real passes from one end to the 
 other. But who can suppose the connection of the 
 parts of the human body less complete than that of 
 the pen, and where shall we find an image more sim- 
 ple to represent it ? 
 
 It is to be conceived, in the third place, that the 
 common sense plays the part of the seal, which im- 
 prints on the imagination, as upon wax, those forms 
 or ideas which the external senses convey to it pure 
 and incorporeal ; that this imagination is a true part 
 of the body, and of such extent that its different parts 
 can take on many forms distinct one from another, 
 and even retain the impression of them for a long 
 time ; in this case it is called memory. 
 
 In the fourth place it is to be conceived that the 
 moving force, or the nerves themselves, have their 
 origin in the brain, which contains the imagination 
 which moves them in a thousand ways, as the common 
 sense is moved by the external sense, or the entire 
 pen by its lower end ; an example which shows how 
 imagination can be the cause of a great number of 
 movements in the nerves without its being necessary 
 that it should have the impression of them in itself, 
 provided that it have other impressions from which 
 these movements may result ; in fact, the entire pen 
 is not moved just as the point is. Rather, it ap- 
 pears, through the main part of it, to follow an exactly 
 opposite inverted movement. This explains the 
 origin of all movements of all animals, although we 
 ascribe to them no knowledge of things, but simply 
 imagination purely corporeal, and also the production
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 95 
 
 in ourselves of all those operations which do not 
 require the aid of reason. 
 
 Finally, in the fifth place, it is to be conceived that 
 this energy, whereby, in the proper sense, we know 
 objects, is purely spiritual, and is no less distinct from 
 the entire body than is the blood from the bones and 
 the hand from the eye ; that it is one and identical, 
 whether with the imagination it receives the forms 
 which the common sense conveys to it, or applies 
 itself to those which the memory keeps in store, or 
 fashions new ones which seize upon the imagination 
 so powerfully that it cannot at the same time receive 
 the ideas which the common sense is bringing to it, 
 or transmit them to the active powers, according to 
 the mode of disposing of them which is proper to it. 
 In all these cases the energy which knows is some- 
 times passive and sometimes active ; now it resembles 
 the seal and again the wax a comparison, however, 
 which must be regarded as merely an analog}'-, because 
 among material objects there is nothing which re- 
 sembles it. It is always one and the same energy 
 which, when applying itself, together with imagination, 
 to the common sense, is called seeing, touching, etc. ; 
 to the imagination, in so far as it revives the various 
 forms [of sense], is called remembering ; to the imagi- 
 nation which creates new forms, is called imagining or 
 conceiving ; which, lastly, when it acts alone, is called 
 comprehending, which we shall explain more at length 
 in its proper place. 
 
 Also, by reason of these different faculties, it 
 receives the different names of pure intellect, imagina- 
 tion, memory, sensibility. It is properly called mind 
 when it forms in the imagination new ideas, or when 
 it applies itself to those already formed there, and we
 
 g6 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 consider it as the cause of these different operations. 
 It will be necessary further on to note the distinction 
 in these terms. All these things being once well un- 
 derstood, the attentive reader will have no trouble as 
 to deciding what assistance each one of these faculties 
 can afford us, and up to what point art can supply the 
 natural defects of the mind. For, as the intellect can 
 be moved by the imagination, and act upon it, as this 
 latter in its turn can act upon the senses aiding the 
 will in applying them to objects, and as the senses, on 
 the other hand, act upon it by painting images of 
 bodily objects there ; as memory, moreover, at least 
 that which is corporeal and which resembles the 
 memory of brutes, is identical with imagination ; it fol- 
 lows therefrom that when intellect is occupied with 
 things which have no corporeal nature, nor anything 
 analogous thereto, it will look in vain for help from 
 these faculties. More than that, in order that its' 
 action be not hindered, it is necessary to banish the 
 senses, and to deprive the imagination, so far as pos- 
 sible, of every distinct impression. 
 
 If, on the contrary, the intellect propose to itself to 
 examine something which can be referred to a body, 
 it must form in the imagination the most distinct idea 
 possible of it. To succeed in this more easily, it must 
 exhibit to the external senses the same object which 
 this idea represents. A plurality of objects will not 
 facilitate distinct intuition of an individual object ; 
 but if from this plurality it is desired to separate an 
 individual, as is often necessary, the imagination must 
 be relieved of all that which would divide the atten- 
 tion, in order that what remains may be the more 
 deeply graven on the memory. In the case of mem- 
 ory itself, it will not be necessary to present the ob-
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 97 
 
 jects themselves to the external senses, but only to 
 afford it abstracted images of them, which, provided 
 they do not lead us into error, are all the better in 
 proportion as they are brief and comprehensive. 
 These are the precepts to be observed, if nothing is 
 to be omitted as regards the first part of our rule. 
 
 Let us .come to the second part and distinguish 
 carefully the notions of simple things from those of 
 composite things ; let us see in which falsity may 
 exist, in order to be on our guard with reference to 
 these ; those in which certainty can be found, in order 
 to apply ourselves exclusively to the study of them. 
 Here, as in our preceding inquiry, certain propositions 
 must be admitted, which perhaps will not receive uni- 
 versal assent ; but it matters little if they are no more 
 believed to be true than are those imaginary circles 
 employed by astronomers to include the phenomena 
 of their science, provided they assist us in distinguish- 
 ing the objects in reference to which our knowledge 
 can be true or false. 
 
 We say, then, in the first place, that things must be 
 considered under another point of view when we ex- 
 amine them in relation to our intelligence which knows 
 them, than when we are speaking of them in reference 
 to their real existence. For instance, suppose a body 
 having extension and figure : in itself, we affirm that 
 it is something one and simple ; in reality it cannot 
 be said to be composite because it has corporeality, 
 extension, and figure, since these elements never 
 exist independently of one another. But in relation 
 to our intelligence, it is a compound of these three 
 elements, because each of them presents itself sepa- 
 rately to our mind before we have time to consider 
 that they are all found united in one and the same
 
 98 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 subject. Thus considering here things merely in their 
 relation to our intelligence, we shall call simple those 
 only the notion of which is so clear and so distinct 
 that the mind cannot divide it into other notions still 
 more simple ; such are figure, extension, movement, 
 etc. We conceive all others as being, in some man- 
 ner, composed of these ; which is to be taken in the 
 widest meaning, not excepting even things which it is 
 possible for us to abstract from these simple notions, 
 as when it is said that figure is the limit of extension, 
 meaning there by limit something more general than 
 figure, since we can speak of the limit of duration, of 
 movement, etc. 
 
 In this case, although the notion of limit is ab- 
 stracted from that of figure, it is not for that reason 
 to be regarded as being more simple than the latter. 
 On the contrary, when we attribute it to other things 
 essentially different from figure, such as duration and 
 movement, it is necessary to abstract it even from 
 these notions, and, consequently, it is a compound of 
 quite diverse elements, to each one of which it can be 
 applied only equivocally. We say, in the second 
 place, that things called simple in relation to our in- 
 telligence are either purely intellectual, or purely ma- 
 terial, or intellectual and material at the same time. 
 The purely intellectual are the things which intelli- 
 gence knows by the aid of a certain natural light, 
 and without the help of any corporeal image. But 
 there is a great number of this kind ; and, for exam- 
 ple, it is impossible to form a material image of 
 doubt, of ignorance, of the action of the will, which it 
 may be permitted me to call volition, and of so many 
 other things, which, nevertheless, we really know, and 
 so easily that all that is necessary is that we be en-
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 99 
 
 dowed with reason. The purely material are the 
 things which are known only in bodies, as figure, ex- 
 tension, movement, etc. Finally, those must be called 
 common which are indifferently attributed to bodies 
 and to minds, such as existence, unity, duration, and 
 others similar. To this class are to be referred those 
 common notions which are, as it were, the bonds 
 which unite together different simple natures, and 
 upon the evidence of which rest the conclusions of 
 reasoning; for example, the proposition, two things 
 equal to a third are equal to each other, and again, 
 two things which cannot be related in the same way 
 to a third are mutually different. But these ideas 
 may be known, either by pure intelligence, or by in- 
 telligence considering the images of material objects. 
 
 Among the number of simple things must be placed 
 their negation and their privation, in so far as these 
 fall under our intelligence, because the idea of non- 
 entity, of the instant, of rest, is no less a true idea 
 than that of existence, of duration, of movement. 
 This way of looking at the matter will allow us to 
 say, consequently, that all the other things that we 
 know are composed of these simple elements : thus, 
 when I judge that a figure is not in motion, I can 
 say that my idea is composed, in a sort, of figure and 
 of rest, and so of others. 
 
 We say, in the third place, that these simple ele- 
 ments are all known by themselves, and contain 
 nothing false; which will readily appear, if we distin- 
 guish the faculty of intelligence which sees* and knows 
 these things from that which judges,f affirming and 
 
 * Reason intuitive. Cf. Erdmann, Hist, of Philos. Modern, 
 pp. 12, 13- 
 
 f Reason discursive, understanding.
 
 IOO THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 denying. It is possible, indeed, that we may think 
 ourselves to be ignorant of things which we really 
 know ; for example, if we suppose that beyond what 
 we can see, and what we can reach by thought, things 
 still contain something unknown to us, and that this 
 supposition may be false. This being so, it is plain 
 that we deceive ourselves, if we think we do not 
 know absolutely any one of these simple natures, for 
 if our intelligence puts itself in the least degree in 
 relation to them, which is necessary, since we are 
 supposed to pass some judgment upon them, it must 
 be concluded from this that we know it absolutely. 
 Otherwise we cannot say that it is simple, but rather, 
 composed, first, of that which we know of it, then, of 
 that of which we believe ourselves to be ignorant. 
 
 We say, in the fourth place, that the connection of 
 these simple things among themselves is either neces- 
 sary or contingent. It is necessary, when the idea of 
 one is so combined with the idea of the other that, 
 when we wish to judge them separately, it is impossible 
 to conceive one of the two distinctly. In this manner 
 figure is combined with extension, movement with 
 duration or time, because it is impossible to conceive 
 figure without extension, and movement without du- 
 ration. In the same way, when I say that four and 
 three make seven, this connection is necessary, be- 
 cause the number seven cannot be conceived dis- 
 tinctly without including in it in a confused manner 
 the number four and the number three. Likewise, 
 further, all that is proved of figures and numbers is 
 necessarily connected with the thing regarding which 
 affirmation is made. This necessity exists not only 
 with respect to sensible objects. For example, if 
 Socrates says he doubts everything, this consequence
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. ici 
 
 necessarily follows, that he knows at least that he 
 doubts ; and this, that he knows that something may 
 be true or false ; for these are notions which neces- 
 sarily accompany doubt. The connection is contin- 
 gent, when things are not inseparably bound together; 
 for example, when we say the body is living, the man 
 is clothed. There are also many propositions which 
 are necessarily connected together, and which the 
 majority class with the contingent, because the rela- 
 tion between them is not observed ; for example, I 
 am, therefore God is ; I know, therefore, I have a 
 mind distinct from my body. Finally, it is to be ob- 
 served that there is a great number of necessary prop- 
 ositions, of which the reciprocal is contingent : thus, 
 although, from the fact that I exist, I conclude with 
 certainty that God exists, I cannot reciprocally affirm, 
 from the fact that God exists, that I exist. 
 
 We say, in the fifth place, that we can know noth- 
 ing beyond these simple natures and the compounds 
 formed from them ; and, also, that it is often much 
 easier to examine several of them joined together than 
 to abstract one from the rest. Thus I can know a 
 triangle without ever having noticed that this knowl- 
 edge contains that of the angle, the line, the number 
 three, figure, extension, etc.; which does not prevent 
 our saying that the nature of the triangle is a com- 
 pound of all these natures, and that they are better 
 known than the triangle, since they are what are com- 
 prised in it. Moreover, there are in this same notion 
 of the triangle many others which exist there and 
 escape our notice, such as the size of the angles, 
 which are equal to two right angles, and the innumer- 
 able relations of the sides to the angles, or to the 
 capacity of the area.
 
 IO2 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 We say, in the sixth place, that the natures called 
 compound are known by us, either because we find by 
 experience that they are composite, or because we 
 combine them ourselves. We know, for example, all 
 that we perceive by the senses, all that we hear said by 
 others, and, in general, all that reaches our under- 
 standing, whether from elsewhere or from the reflec- 
 tions of the understanding itself. It is to be noted 
 here that the understanding cannot be deceived by 
 any experience, if it limit itself to a precise intuition 
 of the object, such as it possesses in the idea of it or 
 its image. Let it not be supposed from this that the 
 imagination faithfully represents to us the objects of 
 the senses ; the senses themselves do not reflect the 
 true form of things ; and finally, external objects are 
 not always such as they appear to us ; we are in all 
 these respects liable to error, just as if we should ac- 
 cept a tale as true history. A man afflicted with the 
 jaundice thinks that everything is yellow, because his 
 eye is of that color ; a mind diseased and melancholy 
 may take for realities the vain phantoms of its imagina- 
 tion. But these same things will not lead into error 
 the intelligence of the wise man, because, while he 
 knows that all that comes to him from imagination 
 was really imprinted there, he will never affirm that 
 the notion has come unaltered from the external ob- 
 jects to the senses, from the senses to the imagina- 
 tion, at least not until he has some other means of 
 assuring himself of the fact. On the other hand, it is 
 we who ourselves combine the objects of our knowl- 
 edge whenever we think that they contain something 
 which our mind perceives immediately without any ex- 
 perience. Thus, when the man who is ill with the jaun- 
 dice persuades himself that what he sees is yellow, his
 
 METHOD] THE DIRECTION OF THE MIND. 103 
 
 knowledge is composed both of that which his imagina- 
 tion represents to him, and of that which he derives 
 from himself, to wit, that the yellow color comes not 
 from a defect of his eye, but from the fact that the 
 things which he sees are really yellow. It follows 
 from all this that we can deceive ourselves only when 
 we ourselves combine the notions which we receive. 
 
 We say, in the seventh place, that this combination 
 may be made in three ways, by impulse, by conjec- 
 ture, or by deduction. Those make up their judg- 
 ments on things by impulse who allow themselves to 
 believe anything without being persuaded by any 
 reason, but are determined, simply, either by some su- 
 perior authority, or by their own free will, or by the in- 
 fluence of their imagination. The first never deceives; 
 the second rarely ; the third almost always : but the 
 first does not belong to this treatise, because it does 
 not fall under the rules of the method. Combination 
 is made by conjecture when, for example, from the fact 
 that water, being far distant from the center of the 
 earth, it is [assumed to be] of a thinner substance ; 
 from the fact that air being placed above the earth, 
 is also much lighter than it, we conclude that above 
 the air there is nothing but an etherial substance, very 
 pure, and much thinner than the air itself. The 
 notions which we combine in this way do not deceive 
 us, provided we accept them only as probabilities, 
 never as truths : but they do not make us any wiser. 
 There remains deduction only, whereby we may com- 
 bine notions of the accuracy of which we maybe sure; 
 and, nevertheless, a great many errors may be com- 
 mitted in it. For example, when from the fact that 
 there is nothing in the air which sight, touch, or any 
 other sense can perceive, we conclude that the space
 
 104 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART I 
 
 which contains it is empty, we improperly connect the 
 nature of the void with that of space ; but this always 
 happens whenever we think we can deduce from a 
 particular and contingent thing something general 
 and necessary. But it is in our power to avoid this 
 error, by never making any combinations in our 
 thought except those which we recognize to be neces- 
 sary ; as, for example, when we conclude that nothing 
 can be figured which is not extended, since figure has 
 a necessary relation to extension. 
 
 From all this it follows, . . . that we have set 
 forth clearly, and, as it seems to me, by a sufficient 
 enumeration, what [we could show at the beginning 
 only confusedly and without method ; to wit, that 
 there are only two ways open to man for attaining 
 a certain knowledge of truth : clear intuition and 
 necessary deduction. . . .
 
 MEDITATIONS 
 
 UPON THE FIRST PHILOSOPHY, IN WHICH 
 ARE CLEARLY PROVED THE EXIST- 
 ENCE OF GOD AND THE REAL 
 DISTINCTION BETWEEN 
 THE SOUL AND THE 
 BODY OF MAN. 
 
 105
 
 MEDITATIONS 
 
 UPON THE FIRST PHILOSOPHY, IN WHICH ARE 
 
 CLEARLY PROVED THE EXISTENCE OF GOD 
 
 AND THE REAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN 
 
 THE SOUL AND THE BODY OF MAN. 
 
 FIRST MEDITATION.* 
 
 Of the things which may be doubted. 
 
 NOT to-day, for the first time, have I become aware 
 that, from my earliest years, I have accepted a multi- 
 tude of false opinions as true, and that what I have 
 based on principles so ill-assured cannot be otherwise 
 than extremely doubtful. Ever since I became con- 
 vinced of this, I have considered that I ought for once 
 in my life seriously to undertake to rid myself of all 
 the false opinions which I have hitherto received, and 
 to begin entirely anew from the foundations, if I 
 wished to establish anything in the sciences that 
 should be solid and stable. But, because it seemed 
 to me to be a great undertaking, I have waited till I 
 should attain an age so ripe that I could not hope for 
 another after it at which I should be more fit to ac- 
 complish the task. I have, in consequence, delayed so 
 long that I believe I should be at fault if I should 
 
 * (Euvrfs, t. i, p. 235. The Meditations may be found trans- 
 lated entire in Veitch's Descartes. 
 
 107
 
 Io8 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 hereafter spend in deliberating the time which remains 
 for action. To-day, then, in accordance with my de- 
 sign, having freed my mind from every kind of care, 
 by good fortune being disturbed by no passions, and 
 having secured to myself a peaceful and solitary re- 
 treat, I shall devote myself, in sober earnest and with 
 entire freedom, to the business of destroying all my 
 former opinions.* But, in order to do this, it will not 
 be necessary for me to prove that every one of them 
 is false, in doing which I might never reach the end. 
 But inasmuch as reason convinces me that I ought 
 to restrain myself from admitting as true things which 
 are not entirely certain and indubitable, not less care- 
 fully than those which appear to me to be manifestly 
 false, there will be sufficient reason for me to reject 
 all of them if I can find in any one of them any 
 grounds for doubt. However, it will not be necessary 
 that I examine each one in particular, which would be 
 infinite labor ; but, inasmuch as the destruction of the 
 foundations necessarily involves the ruin of the whole 
 edifice, I will apply myself at once to the principles 
 upon which all my old opinions rest. 
 
 All that I have hitherto received as most true and 
 assured I have learned from the senses or by means 
 of the senses. But I have sometimes found that these 
 senses were deceivers, and it is the part of prudence 
 never to trust entirely those who have once deceived 
 us.f 
 
 * Cf. Principles of Philosophy t part I, I, 2. 
 
 1. The seeker after truth once in his life, so far as it is possible, 
 should doubt all things. 
 
 2. What is doubtful should be considered false. 
 (Euvres, t. iii, pp. 63, 64. Veitch's Descartes, p. 193. 
 
 j- Cf . Princ. I, 4. Why we may doubt of sensible things.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 109 
 
 But although the senses may deceive us sometimes 
 in regard to things which are scarcely perceptible and 
 very distant, yet there are many other things of which 
 we cannot entertain a reasonable doubt, although we 
 know them by means of the senses ; for example, that 
 I am here, seated by the fire, in my dressing-gown, 
 holding this paper in my hands, and other things of 
 such a nature. And how can I deny that these hands 
 and this body are mine? Only by imitating those 
 crazy people, whose brains are so disturbed and con- 
 fused by the black vapors of the bile that they con- 
 stantly affirm that they are kings, while in fact they 
 are very poor ; that they are clothed in gold and 
 purple, while they are quite naked ; or who imagine 
 themselves to be pitchers, or to have glass bodies. 
 But what ! These are fools, and I should be no less 
 extravagant if I should follow their example. Never- 
 theless, I have to consider that I am a man, and that 
 I fall asleep and in my dreams imagine the same 
 things or even sometimes things less probable than 
 these crazy people do while they are awake. How 
 often have I dreamed in the night that I was in this 
 place, that I was dressed, that I was before the fire, 
 although I was quite naked in my bed. It seems to 
 me indeed at present that I am looking on this paper 
 not with eyes asleep, that this head which I shake 
 is not in a drowse, that it is with deliberate pur- 
 pose I stretch out my hand, and that I perceive it. 
 What happens in sleep does not appear so clear and 
 distinct as all this. 
 
 But when I consider it carefully, I remember that I 
 have often been deceived, while asleep, by similar illu- 
 sions, and, pondering on the matter, I see so plainly 
 that there are no certain marks by which the waking
 
 110 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 is distinguished from the sleeping state that I am 
 quite astonished, and my astonishment is so great as 
 almost to persuade me that I am asleep.* 
 
 Let us, then, suppose that we are asleep, and that 
 all these particular events that we open our eyes, 
 shake our heads, stretch out our hands, and such like 
 things are only false illusions, and let us think that 
 perhaps neither our hands nor our entire bodies are 
 such as we perceive them. Nevertheless, we must at 
 least admit that the things which we imagine in sleep 
 are like pictures and paintings, which can only be 
 formed after the likeness of something real and veri- 
 table. Accordingly, these things in general namely, 
 eyes, head, hands, body are not imaginary, but real 
 and existent. For truly, painters, even when they 
 strive with the utmost art to represent sirens and 
 satyrs by extravagant and fantastical figures, cannot, 
 nevertheless, give them forms and natures entirely 
 novel, but only make a certain mixture and combina- 
 tion of divers creatures, or, even if their imagination 
 is extravagant enough to invent something so new the 
 like whereof has never been seen, and their work 
 represents something purely fictitious and absolutely 
 false, certainly, at the very least, the colors of which 
 they are composed must be real. 
 
 By the same reason, granting that these things in 
 general, namely, body, eyes, head, hands, and other 
 like things, may be imaginary, nevertheless it must be 
 admitted that there are at least some other things still 
 
 *Epistemon. Have you never heard in the old comedies that 
 stock-phrase for expressing astonishment : Am I, then, asleep? 
 How can you be certain that your life is not a continuous dream, 
 and that all that you perceive by the senses is not as false as when 
 you are asleep ? Recherche de la Verite. (CEuvres, t. xi, p. 350.)
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. in 
 
 more simple and universal, which are true and exist- 
 ent, of the combination of which, no more nor less 
 than that formed from certain real colors, all these 
 images of things which dwell in the mind, be they true 
 and real, or fictitious and fantastic, are formed. Of 
 this nature is corporeal being in general and its ex- 
 tension, together with the figure of things extended, 
 their quantity or size, and their number, as also the 
 place where they are, the time which measures their 
 duration, and other similar things. Accordingly, per- 
 haps, we shall not from this conclude incorrectly, if 
 we say that physics, astronomy, medicine, and all the 
 other sciences which are occupied with the considera- 
 tion of things composite, are very doubtful and uncer- 
 tain, but that arithmetic, geometry, and the other 
 sciences of that nature, which treat only of things 
 quite simple and quite general, without being much 
 concerned whether they exist in reality or not, contain 
 something certain and indubitable, because, whether I 
 am awake or asleep, two and three taken together 
 always make five, and a square never has more than 
 four sides, and it does not seem possible that truths so 
 clear and so evident can be suspected of any falsity or 
 uncertainty. 
 
 Nevertheless, for a long time I have cherished the 
 belief that there is a God who can do everything 
 and by whom I was made and created such as I am. 
 But how do I know that he has not caused that there 
 should be no earth, no heavens, no extended body, 
 no figure, no size, no place, and that, nevertheless, I 
 should have perceptions of all these things, and that 
 everything should seem to me to exist not otherwise 
 than as I perceive it ? And even in like manner as I 
 judge that others deceive themselves in matters that
 
 112 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 they know best, how do I know that he has not caused 
 that I deceive myself every time that I add two to 
 three, or number the sides of a square, or judge of 
 anything still more simple, if anything more simple 
 can be imagined ? * But it may be that God has not 
 willed that I should be deceived in this manner, since 
 he is called supremely good. Nevertheless, if it is 
 repugnant to his goodness to create me such that I 
 should deceive myself constantly, it would appear also 
 to be contrary to it to permit me to deceive myself 
 sometimes, and yet I cannot doubt that he does per- 
 mit it 
 
 I shall suppose, then, not that God, who is very 
 good and the sovereign source of truth, but that a 
 certain evil genius, no less wily and deceitful than 
 powerful, has employed all his ingenuity to deceive 
 me. I shall think that the heavens, the air, the earth, 
 colors, figures, sounds, and all other external things, 
 are nothing but illusions and idle fancies which he 
 employs to impose upon my credulity. I shall con- 
 sider myself as having no hands, no eyes, no flesh, no 
 blood, as having no senses, but, as believing falsely that 
 I possess all these things. I shall obstinately adhere 
 to this opinion ; and if by this means it will not be in 
 my power to arrive at the knowledge of any truth, at 
 all events it is in my power to suspend my judgment. 
 Therefore I shall take diligent care not to receive into 
 my faith any falsehood, and I shall prepare my mind 
 so well against all the wiles of this great deceiver, 
 that, powerful and crafty as he may be, he will never 
 be able to impose upon me 
 
 * Cf. Princ., I, 5. Why we may doubt even of mathematical 
 demonstrations.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 113 
 
 SECOND MEDITATION. 
 
 Of the nature of the human mind ; and that it is more 
 easily known than the body. 
 
 YESTERDAY'S meditation has filled my mind with 
 so many doubts that it is henceforth impossible for 
 me to forget them, and yet I do not see howl can re- 
 solve them I shall nevertheless make an effort 
 
 and follow on once more in the way on which I 
 entered yesterday ; withdrawing myself from every- 
 thing in which I can imagine the least doubt, just 
 as t if I knew it to be absolutely false ; and I shall 
 keep steadily on in this path until I have found some- 
 thing certain, or at least, if I can do nothing else, 
 until I have found out certainly that there is nothing 
 in the world that is certain.* Archimedes, in order 
 to move the terrestrial globe from its place and trans- 
 port it into another, required only a point which should 
 be firm and immovable, and even so may I entertain 
 high hopes if only I am fortunate enough to find 
 barely one thing which is certain and indubitable, f 
 
 * Ettdoxe. But for fear you will refuse to follow me further, I 
 assure you that these doubts, which at the outset make you afraid, 
 are like the phantoms and the shadowy forms which appear in the 
 night-time in the uncertain glimmer of a feeble light. Fear pur- 
 sues you if you flee from them ; but march up to them, lay your 
 hands upon them, and you will find them nothing but air, nothing 
 but shadow, and your fears will vanish forever. Recherche de 
 la Verite. (CEuvres, t. xi, p. 3?2.) 
 
 \Eudoxe. Only give me your attention. I am going to lead 
 you further than you think. Indeed, from this universal doubt,
 
 114 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 I make the supposition, then, that all things which I 
 see are false ; I persuade myself that nothing has ever 
 existed of all that my memory, filled with illusions, 
 has represented to me ; I consider that I have no 
 senses ; I assume that body, figure, extension, motion, 
 and place are only fictions of my mind. What is there, 
 then, which can be held to be true ? Perhaps nothing 
 at all, except the statement that there is nothing at 
 all that is true. But how do I know that there is not 
 something different from those things which I have 
 just pronounced uncertain, concerning which there 
 cannot be entertained the least doubt? Is there not 
 some God, or some other power, who puts these 
 thoughts into my mind ? That is not necessary, for 
 perhaps I am capable of producing them of myself. 
 Myself then ! at the very least am I not something ? 
 
 But I have already denied that 1 have any senses 
 or any body ; nevertheless I hesitate, for what follows 
 from that ? Am I so dependent upon the body and 
 the senses that I cannot exist without them ? But I 
 have persuaded myself that there is nothing at all in 
 the world, that there are no heavens, no earth, no 
 minds, no bodies ; am I then also persuaded that I 
 am not ? Far from it ! Without doubt I exist, if I 
 am persuaded, or solely if I Have thought anything 
 whatever. But there is I know not what deceiver, 
 very powerful, very crafty, who employs all his cun- 
 ning continually to delude me. There is still no 
 doubt that I exist, if he deceives me ; and let him 
 deceive me as he may, he will never bring it about 
 that I shall be nothing, so long as I shall think some- 
 
 as from a fixed and immovable point, I am resolved to derive the 
 knowledge of God, of yourself, and of the whole universe. 
 Recherche de la Verite. ((Eirurcs, t. xi, p. 353).
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 
 
 thing ^ixjsjts. Accordingly, having considered it 
 and carefully examined everything, I am obliged to 
 conclude and to hold for certain that this proposition, 
 / am, I exist, is necessarily true, every time that I 
 pronounce it or conceive it in my mind. 
 
 NOTE. Compare the following passages illustrative of 
 the proposition / think, therefore I exist : 
 
 And observing that this truth, / think, therefore I am, 
 was so firm and so certain that no suggestions of skeptics, 
 however extravagant, could ever shake it, I concluded that I 
 might accept it without scruple as the first principle of 
 the philosophy I was in search of. Discourse on Method, 
 Part IV. (CEuvres, t. i, p. 158.) 
 
 ., 
 Principles, I, 7, and g. 
 
 J. For it is contradictory [repngnat] to suppose that any- 
 thing which thinks, at the same time in which it thinks, does 
 not exist. And hence this knowledge, ego cogito, ergo sum, 
 rs the first and most certain of any which presents itself to 
 one who philosophizes in an orderly manner. 
 
 9. What thought is. 
 
 By the word thought \cogitatto~\ I mean all that which, 
 when we are conscious, takes place in us, in so far as there 
 is in us a consciousness of these things. And accordingly, 
 not only to understand, to will, to imagine, but even to feel, 
 is the same here as to think. For if I say, I see, or I ivalk, 
 therefore I am; and have in mind the seeing or the walking 
 which is performed by the body, the conclusion is not abso- 
 lutely certain ; because, as often happens in sleep, I can 
 think that I see, or that I walk, although I do not open my 
 eyes, or stir from my place, and even, possibly, although I have 
 no body ; but if I have in mind the sense itself, or conscious- 
 ness, of seeing or walking, which in that case is referred to 
 the mind, which alone perceives, or thinks, itself to see or to 
 walk, it is manifestly certain. [Lat.] 
 
 By the term thought I understand all that is within us 
 in such manner that we are immediately conscious of it by
 
 Il6 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 ourselves and have of it an inner knowledge ; thus all the 
 operations of the will, the understanding, the imagination, 
 the senses, are thoughts. But I add immediately to exclude 
 the things which follow and depend upon our thoughts ; for 
 example, voluntary movement, which has in truth the will for 
 its source (principe), but still is not itself a thought. Thus, 
 to walk is not a thought, but rather the .feeling, or the knowl- 
 edge that one has that he is walking. Reply to Second Ob- 
 jection. (Geom. proof, Def. I, CEuvres, t. i, p. 145.) 
 
 Cogito, ergo sum, not a conclusion of a syllogism. 
 
 When anyone says, / think, therefore I am, or / exist, he 
 does not conclude his existence from his thought by force of 
 any syllogism, but as a thing known by itself ; he sees it by 
 a simple inspection of the mind, as appears from this, that if 
 Tie should deduce it by syllogism, he must first know this 
 major to be true, Whatever thinks is, or exists : but on the 
 contrary he learns it from his perceiving within himself that 
 it would be impossible that he should think if he did not 
 exist. For it is the property of our mind to form general 
 propositions from the knowledge of particular ones. Reply 
 to Second Objection. (CEuvres, t. i, p. 427.) See Bouillier, 
 t. i, p. 63. 
 
 In criticism of the Second Meditation your friends bring 
 forward six things. The first is that in saying I think, there- 
 fore I am, the author of the Instances* will have it that I 
 presuppose this major, he who thinks is ; and accordingly 
 that I have at the start adopted a presupposition (prej'uge). 
 Wherein he misuses again the term presupposition ; for 
 although the name might be applied to this proposition when 
 uttered unreflectingly, and it might be believed to be true 
 solely because of its being remembered as a judgment pre- 
 viously passed, yet it cannot be said to be a presupposition 
 when one gives his mind to it, because it appears so evident 
 to the understanding that a man cannot help believing it, 
 even though it be the first time in his life that he has 
 thought about it, and consequently there is no presupposition 
 whatever in the case. But the more considerable error here 
 * Gassendi.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 117 
 
 is that this author supposes that the knowledge of particular 
 propositions is always to be deduced from universals, accord- 
 ing to the order of syllogisms in logic ; wherein he shows 
 that he knows very little how truth is to be sought ; for it is 
 certain that, in order to find it, we must always begin with 
 the particular notions, in order thence to arrive at the gen- 
 eral notions, although we can reciprocally, also, having 
 reached the general, deduce therefrom other particular 
 truths. Thus, when one is teaching a child the elements of 
 geometry, he will not make him understand the general 
 truth, when from two equal quantities equal parts are 
 taken, the remainders are equal, or that the whole is 
 greater than any of its parts, unless he shows him examples 
 of it in particular cases. Letter to Clerselier, on the objec- 
 tions of Gassendi. ((Euvres, t. ii. pp. 305-6.) 
 
 These interpretations by Descartes of his own thought 
 must be borne in mind when in the Principles we find him 
 placing among the common notions, or axioms, this universal : 
 He who thinks cannot be non-existent while he thinks* 
 
 It is manifest that Descartes believed that, in reaching 
 this innermost point of personal self-consciousness, he had 
 reached the point of coincidence of thought and reality. 
 From this vantage-ground he will now look out to see what 
 further revelations await him. But the cogito, ergo sum, is 
 the primary datum and starting-point. In the apprehen- 
 sion of this existential truth he finds himself no longer in 
 the realm of abstract thought, but face to face with reality. 
 Is this basis of his system a fact, then, or a principle ? A 
 fact, surely, but the supersensible and spiritual fact of per- 
 sonal existence. 
 
 Descartes' / think, therefore I am, not identical with something 
 similar in the writings of St. Augustine : " Quid, si falleris ? 
 Si enim fallor, sum. Nam qui non est, utique nee fall! 
 potest, ac per hoc sum, si fallor. Quia ergo sum, qui fallor, 
 quomodo esse me fallor, quando certum est me esse si 
 fallor." Augustine, De Civitate Dei, 1. xi, c. 26. * 
 
 I am obliged to you for calling my attention to the 
 passage of St. Augustine to which my / think, therefore 2 
 * See Hamilton's Reid, Note A., p. 744.
 
 Il8 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 am, bears some resemblance ; I read the passage to-day in 
 the]town library, and I find, indeed, that he makes use of it to 
 prove the certainty of our own being, and then to show that 
 there is within us a certain image of the Trinity, in that we 
 are, we know that we are, and we love this being and this 
 knowledge within us ; whereas I employ it to show that this 
 / which thinks is an immaterial substance, and has nothing 
 corporeal in it, which are two very different things, and it is 
 so simple and natural an inference, from the fact of one's 
 doubting to conclude that he exists, that it might have fallen 
 from anybody's pen ; however, I am none the less pleased to 
 meet with it in St. Augustine, if only to close the mouths of 
 those small wits who have tried to raise difficulties about 
 this principle. Letter to M. (de Zuytlichem) (Huyghens ?). 
 (CEuvres, t. viii, p. 421.) 
 
 But I do not yet know with sufficient clearness 
 what I am, I who am certain that I am ; wherefore I 
 must be on my guard henceforth not unadvisedly to 
 take something else for myself, and so fall into a mis- 
 take in this knowledge, which I maintain to be more 
 certain and more evident than all that I have gained 
 before it. Accordingly, I shall now consider anew 
 that which I believed to be before I entered into these 
 last reflections ; and of my old opinions I shall cut off 
 everyone which is in the least oppugned by the argu- 
 ments which I have just stated, so that there shall re- 
 main only that precisely which is entirely certain and 
 indubitable. What is it, then, which I have believed 
 myself to be hitherto ? Undoubtedly, I have thought 
 that I was a man. But what, then, is a man ? Shall I 
 say that a man is a reasonable animal ? No, surely, 
 for then it would be necessary for me to find out what 
 animal is and what reasonable is, and thus from a 
 single question I should fall by degrees into an infini- 
 tude of others more difficult and more embarrassing ;
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 119 
 
 and I am not willing to squander the little time 
 and leisure that remain to me in solving diffi- 
 culties of that sort.* But I pause rather to con- 
 sider here the thoughts which arose before of them- 
 selves in my mind, and which were inspired in me by 
 my own nature simply, whenever I addressed myself to 
 the consideration of my being. I considered myself, 
 in the first place, as having a face, hands, arms, and 
 all this mechanism composed of bone and flesh, such 
 as it appears in a corpse, which I designated by the 
 name body. I considered, moreover, that I took 
 food, that I walked, that I felt and that I thought, 
 and I referred all these actions to the mind ; but I 
 did not stop to think what this mind was, or, indeed, 
 if I did stop to think, I imagined that it was some- 
 thing extremely rare and subtile, like breath, a flaine, 
 or a very thin vapor, which was instilled and spread 
 through my grosser parts. As to the nature of the 
 body, I had no doubt whatever ; but I thought I 
 knew it very distinctly ; and had I desired to explain 
 
 * Eudoxe. For example, if I should ask Episte'mon what a man 
 is, and he should answer, as they do in the schools, that a man is 
 a rational animal ; and then, to explain these two terms, which are 
 no less obscure than the first, he should conduct us through all the 
 steps which they call metaphysical, we should be involved in a 
 1 ibyrinth from which it would be impossible to escape. In fact, 
 from this question there arise two others ; first, what is an animal ? 
 second, what is rational ? And further, if, to explain animal, he 
 should tell us it is something living, and that something living is 
 an animated body, that body is corporeal substance, you see that 
 the questions, like the branches of a genealogical tree, would go 
 on increasing and multiplying ; and at last all these fine questions 
 would end in mere tautology, which would make nothing clearer, 
 and would leave us in our former ignorance. Recherche de la 
 Verite. (CEuvres, t. xi, p. 355.)
 
 120 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 it according to the notions I then had of it, I should 
 have described it in this manner. 
 
 By the term body I understand all that can be 
 bounded by some figure; which can be contained within 
 some place, and fill a space in such a manner that every 
 other body is excluded therefrom ; which can have 
 sensations either by touch, or by sight, or by hearing, 
 or by taste, or by smell, which can be moved in 
 various ways, not, in truth, by itself, but by some out- 
 ward thing by which it may be touched, and the im- 
 pression of which it may receive ; for to have the 
 power of being moved by itself, as also of feeling 
 and of thinking, I did not believe at all that this be- 
 longed to the nature of body ; on the contrary, I was 
 astonished rather to find such powers occurring in 
 any bodies. But as for me, what am I, now that I am 
 supposing that there is a certain genius extremely 
 powerful, and, if I dare say it, malicious and crafty, 
 who employs all his energies and all his cunning to 
 deceive me ? Can I assure myself that I have the 
 least of all those things which I have just now said 
 belong to the nature of body? I pause to think 
 attentively ; I go over and over all these things in 
 my mind, and I do not meet with any one which I 
 can say is in me. It is not necessary to stop to 
 enumerate them. Let us, then, pass on to the attri- 
 butes of the soul, and see whether any one of thVrh is 
 in me. 
 
 The first are my taking food and walking ; but if it 
 be true that I have no body, it is also true that I can- 
 not walk or feed myself. Another is perceiving ; 
 but perception is impossible without the body, although 
 I have thought before that I perceived many things 
 during sleep which, on awaking, I have recognized as
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. VijJ 
 
 not being really perceived. Another is thinking ; and 
 I find here an attribute which belongs to me ; thought 
 alone cannot be detached from me. I am, I exist 
 that is certain ; but how long? As long as I think ; 
 because it might happen that if I should cease entirely 
 from thinking I might in the same moment cease 
 utterly from being.* I am admitting nothing now 
 which is not necessarily true ; I am, then, to speak 
 with precision, a thing which thinks, that is to say, 
 a mind, an understanding, or a reason ; f terms the 
 significance of which was unknown to me before. 
 
 But I am a truly existing thing ; but what thing ? 
 I have said ; a thing which thinks ; and what more? I 
 stir up my imagination to see whether I am not still 
 something in addition. I am not this collection of 
 members which is called the human body ; I am not 
 a thin and penetrating vapor diffused throughout 
 these members ; I am not a wind, a breath, a vapor ; 
 nor anything at all of all that I am able to picture or 
 imagine myself to be, since I have assumed that all 
 that is nothing at all, and that without changing this 
 assumption I find that I do not cease to be certain 
 that I am something. 
 
 But what is it, then, that I am ~,A thing which 
 thinks. What is a thing which thinks I- It is a thing 
 which doubts, which understands, which conceives, 
 which affirms, which denies, which wills, which wills 
 not, which imagines also, and which perceives. Surely, 
 It is no small matter if all these things belong to my 
 nature. But why do they not belong to it? Am I 
 not that even which now doubts almost everything ; 
 
 * See reply to Hyperaspistes, cited below, p. 128. 
 f For Hobbes's objection and Descartes' reply see Obj. e 
 (Euvres, t. i, p. 468 et seq.
 
 122 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 which nevertheless understands and conceives certain 
 things ; which is assured and affirms these only to be 
 true, and denies the rest ; which wills and desires to 
 know more ; which wills not to be deceived ; which 
 imagines many things, even sometimes in spite of my- 
 self ; and which also perceives many, as if by the inter- 
 position of bodily organs. Is there nothing of all 
 .that which is as true as it is certain that I am and 
 that I exist, even although I were always sleeping, 
 and he who gave me my being were using all his 
 skill to deceive me ? Is there also any of these at- 
 tributes which can be distinguished from my thought, 
 or which can be said to be separate from myself ? 
 For it is so evident of itself that it is I who doubt, 
 who understand, and who desire, that there is no 
 need here of adding anything to explain it. ^And I 
 also certainly have the power of imagining; for. al- 
 though it might happen (as I have already supposed) 
 that the things which I have imagined were not true, 
 nevertheless this power of imagining does not cease 
 really to exist in me, and to form part of my thought. 
 
 Finally, I am the same being which perceives ; that 
 is, which has knowledge of certain things as if by the 
 organs of sense, since in reality I see light, I hear 
 noise, I feel warmth. But I have been told that these 
 appearances are false, and that I am asleep. Granted ; 
 nevertheless, at least, it is very certain that it .appears 
 to me that I see light, that I hear noise, and that I 
 feel warmth ; that cannot be false ; and it is just that 
 which in me I call perceiving ; and that, precisely, is 
 nothing else than thinking. From this point I begin 
 to know what I am with more clearness and distinct- 
 ness than heretofore. 
 
 But nevertheless it still appears to me, and I cannot
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 123 
 
 help believing, that corporeal things, the images of 
 which are formed by thought, which fall under the 
 senses, and which the senses themselves observe, are 
 not much more distinctly known than that I know 
 not what part of myself which does not fall under 
 the imagination : although, indeed, it would be very 
 strange to say that I know and comprehend more 
 distinctly things whose existence appears to me doubt- 
 ful, which are unknown to me, and which do not be- 
 long to me, than those of the truth of which I am 
 persuaded, which are known to me, which belong to 
 my proper nature in a word, than myself. But I see 
 well enough how it is ; my mind is a vagabond, which 
 takes delight in leading me astray, and will not suffer 
 itself to be kept within the strict bounds of truth. 
 
 Let us then give it free rein for once, and, granting 
 every sort of liberty, let us allow it to dwell upon the 
 objects which appear to it externally, in order that 
 hereafter, when we shall proceed to withdraw it gently 
 and at the right time, and detain it upon the considera- 
 tion of its own being and the things which it finds 
 within itself, thenceforward it shall be more easily 
 regulated and guided. Let us then consider the 
 things which are commonly thoifght to be the easiest of 
 all to know, and that are believed to be most distinctly 
 known, that is to say, bodies that we touch and see ; 
 not, indeed, such bodies in general, for these general 
 notions are usually a little more confused ; but let us 
 consider a particular body. Let us take, for instance, 
 this piece of wax 
 
 What then ! I who appear to conceive of this piece 
 of wax with so much clearness and distinctness, do I 
 not know myself not only with much more truth and 
 certainty, but even with much more distinctness and
 
 124 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 clearness ! For if I judge that the wax is or exists, 
 from the fact that I see it, certainly it follows much 
 more evidently that I am or that I exist myself, from 
 the fact that I see it, for it may be that what I see is 
 not in reality wax ; it may also be that I have not eyes 
 even to see anything ; but it cannot be that while I 
 see, or what I do not distinguish therefrom while I 
 think I see, I who think am not something. Like- 
 wise, if I judge that the wax exists from the fact that 
 I touch it, the same thing will follow, to wit : that I 
 am ; and if I judge so because my imagination or 
 something else, whatever it may be persuades me 
 thus, I shall always draw the same conclusion. And 
 what I have said here of the wax is applicable to all 
 other things external to me, and which are to be met 
 with outside of me. And, moreover, if the notion or 
 perception of the wax appeared to me more clear and 
 distinct after not only the seeing it and the touching it, 
 but after many other causes had rendered it most man- 
 ifest to me, with how much greater evidence, distinct- 
 ness, and clearness, must it be admitted that I know at 
 present myself, since all the reasons which contribute 
 to the knowing and the conceiving of the nature of the 
 wax prove much better the nature of my mind ; and, 
 besides, there are so many other things in the mind 
 itseif which can contribute to the revelation of its 
 nature, that those which depend upon the body, as 
 these do, hardly deserve to be taken into the account. 
 But at last, by degrees almost imperceptible to my- 
 self, I have reached the point I desired, because, since 
 there is one thing at present manifest to me, that 
 bodies themselves are not really known by the senses 
 or by the faculty of imagination, and that they are 
 not known from the fact that they are seen or touched,
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 125 
 
 but solely from the fact that they are understood, or 
 at least comprehended by thought, I see clearly that 
 there is nothing which is more easy for me to know 
 than my mind.* But because it is difficult to rid 
 one's self so promptly of an opinion to which one has 
 been accustomed for a long time, it will be well for 
 me to stop a while at this point, in order that by longer 
 meditation I may impress more deeply upon my mem- 
 ory this new knowledge. 
 
 * Cf. Princ. I, 8, n. (CEuvres, t. iii, pp. 67-69.) Veitch's Des- 
 cartes, pp. 195-197. 

 
 126 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. (PART II 
 
 THIRD MEDITATION. 
 
 Of God : that he exists. 
 
 .... I am certain then that I am a thing that thinks ; 
 but do I not then also know that which is necessary 
 to make me certain of anything ? Certainly, in this 
 primary knowledge there is nothing which assures me 
 of its truth but the clear and distinct perception of 
 what I affirm, which test of truth would not be suffi- 
 cient to assure me that what I affirm is true, if it could 
 ever happen that a thing which I conceive thus clearly 
 and distinctly should prove false : and, accordingly, it 
 appears to me that I can now lay down this as a gen- 
 eral rule, that all things which we conceive very 
 clearly and very distinctly are true.* 
 
 And, certainly, since I have no reason to believe that 
 there is a God who can deceive, and as I have not yet 
 even considered the arguments which prove that there 
 is a God, the reason for doubt which depends solely 
 on that opinion is very frivolous, and, so to speak, 
 metaphysical. But in order to be able to remove it 
 entirely I must examine whether there is a God, so 
 soon as the occasion shall present itself ; and if I find 
 that there is one, I must also examine whether he can 
 be a deceiver : for without the knowledge of these 
 two truths I do not see that I can ever be certain of 
 anything. And in order that I may have occasion to 
 
 * Cf . Discourse, pt. iv. ((Enures, t. i, p. 159.) Veitch's Des- 
 cartes, p. 35. Also, Princ. I, 45-50. See below.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 127 
 
 examine into this matter without interrupting the 
 order of meditation which I have proposed to myself, 
 which is to pass by degrees from notions which I shall 
 find first in my mind to those which I shall be able to 
 discover afterward, it is necessary here that I divide 
 all my thoughts into certain classes, and that I con- 
 sider in which of these classes truth and error properly 
 exist. 
 
 Among my thoughts, some are, as it were, the images 
 of things, and it is to these alone that the term3eati~ 
 properly belongs ; as when I represent to myself a 
 man, or a chimera, or the heavens, or an angel, or God 
 even. Moreover, besides that, there are certain other 
 forms ; as when 1 desire and fear, when I affirm or 
 deny, I do then, indeed, conceive something as the sub- 
 ject of the action of my mind, but I add also some- 
 thing else by this action to the idea that I have of this 
 thing and of this class of thoughts ; some are called 
 volitions or affections, and others judgments. 
 
 Now, so far as ideas are concerned, if they are con- 
 sidered simply in themselves, and as having no relation 
 to anything else, they cannot, properly speaking, be 
 false ; because, whether I imagine a goat or a chimera, 
 ifTs no less true that I imagine the one than the other. 
 There can be no fear, also, of encountering falsity in 
 affections or volitions ; for although I may desire 
 things evil, or even things which never have existed, 
 nevertheless, for all that, it is no less true that I desire 
 them. 
 
 Thus there remain judgments alone, in which I 
 must be diligently on guard against being deceived. 
 But the principal error, and the one of most common 
 
 *Geom. proof, Def. II. (CEuvres, t. i, p. 452.) Veitch's Des~ 
 carles, Note XI, p. 276.
 
 128 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 occurrence, consists in my judging that the ideas 
 which are in me are like or are conformed to things 
 which are outside of me ; for certainly, if I consider 
 simply the ideas as certain modes or forms of my 
 thought, without desiring to refer them to anything 
 external, they can hardly afford any occasion of 
 error. But, among my ideas, some appear to me to 
 be born with me,* others to be strangers and to come 
 
 * It is not without reason that I am assured that the human soul, 
 wherever it may be, always thinks, even in the mother's womb. 
 What reason more certain or more evident could be desired than that 
 which I employ, since I have proved that its nature or its essence 
 consists in its being a thing which thinks, just as the essence of 
 the body consists in being a thing extended ; for it is not possible 
 to deprive anything of its own essence ; and therefore it seems to 
 me that no more account should be made of him who denies that 
 his soul was thinking at a time when he does not remember to 
 have perceived that it was thinking, than if he should deny that 
 his body was extended at a time when he did not perceive that 
 there was any extension. I do not say that I am persuaded that 
 the mind of the babe in its mother's womb thinks on metaphysical 
 subjects ; on the contrary, if I may be permitted to form a con- 
 jecture upon a matter concerning which so little can be known, 
 since we find every day that our mind is so closely united to the 
 body that it almost constantly suffers from it, and although a 
 mind acting in a body sound and strong enjoys some freedom to 
 think on other things besides those which the senses present to it, 
 nevertheless experience teaches us only too often that there is no 
 such freedom in the case of sick people, nor for those who are 
 asleep, nor for infants, and that there is generally less as age is 
 less advanced ; there is nothing more reasonable than to believe 
 that the mind newly joined to the infant body is occupied only 
 with feeling or being obscurely conscious of the ideas of pain, of 
 pleasure, of cold, of warmth, or such like, which spring from the 
 union or so to speak the mixture of the mind with the body. 
 And nevertheless, in this state even, the mind has not less in 
 itself the ideas of God, of itself, and of all those truths which are 
 self-evident, than adult persons do when they are not thinking of
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 129 
 
 from without, and others to be made and invented by 
 myself. 
 
 As regards the faculty to conceive what in general 
 is called a thing, or a truth, or a thought, it appears 
 to me that I have that [power] from no other source 
 than my own nature ; but if I now hear some noise, 
 if I see the sun, if I feel warmth, up to this moment 
 I have judged that these sensations proceeded from 
 things which coexist outside of me ; and, finally, it 
 appears to me that sirens, hippogriffs, and all other 
 similar chimeras are fictions and inventions of my 
 mind. But also, on the other hand, perhaps I may 
 persuade myself that all these ideas are of the kind 
 that I have called foreign, and which come from with- 
 out, or, indeed, that they are all born with me, or, 
 perhaps, that they have all been made by me ; for I 
 have not yet clearly discovered their true source. 
 And what I have principally to do at this point is to 
 consider with respect to those which appear to me to 
 come from objects outside of me, what are the reasons 
 which oblige me to think that they resemble those 
 objects. 
 
 The first of these reasons is that I am so taught by 
 nature ; and the second, that I discover in myself 
 that these ideas do not depend upon my will ; for 
 frequently they present themselves to me in spite of 
 myself, as, at this time, whether I will or no, I feel 
 warmth, and therefore I am persuaded that this feel- 
 ing or, if you please, this idea of warmth is produced 
 
 them ; for it does not acquire them afterward with increasing 
 age. And I do not doubt that at that time, if it were freed from 
 the bondage of the body, it would find these ideas within itself. 
 Reply to Hyperaspistes. Lettres ((Euvres t. viii, p. 268). Cf. 
 Veitch's Descartes, Note VI, p. 287.
 
 130 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 in me by something different from myself, to wit, by 
 the heat of the fire before which I am seated. And I 
 see nothing which appears to me more reasonable 
 than to judge that this foreign thing emits and im- 
 presses upon me its likeness rather than something 
 else. Now I must see whether these reasons are suf- 
 ficiently strong and convincing. When I say that it 
 seems to me that this is taught me by nature, I under- 
 stand, by this word nature, simply a certain inclina- 
 tion which impels me to believe it, and not a natural 
 light which makes me know that it is true.* But 
 these two expressions are very different. For I can 
 call in question nothing which the natural light has 
 made me see to be true, as, for instance, it has so 
 often made me see that from the fact that I doubt I 
 can conclude that I exist ; inasmuch as I have in me 
 no other faculty or power for distinguishing the true 
 from the false, which can teach me that what this 
 light shows me to be true is not so, and in which I 
 can put so much confidence as I can in this. 
 
 But as concerns those inclinations which also ap- 
 pear to be natural to me, I have often observed 
 that when there was a choice to be made between 
 virtues and vices, that they have carried me not less 
 toward the evil than toward the good ; and therefore 
 it is that I have no more reason to follow them in 
 matters where the true and the false are concerned. 
 And as for the other reason, that these ideas must 
 come from some other source than myself, since they 
 do not depend upon my will, I do not find it any more 
 convincing. For in quite the same way as those in- 
 clinations of which I am just now speaking are found 
 in me notwithstanding that they do not always agree 
 
 * Cf. Hobbes' objection and Descartes' reply cited below.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 131 
 
 with my will, so, perhaps, there may be in me some 
 faculty or power adequate to produce these ideas, 
 without the aid of any external things, although it 
 may not be known to me ; as, indeed, it has always 
 appeared to me up to the present that they are formed 
 within me thus when I was asleep, without the aid of 
 the objects which they represent. And even if I 
 should admit that they are formed by these objects it 
 would not necessarily follow that they must resemble 
 them. 
 
 On the other hand, I have observed in many in- 
 stances that there is a great difference between the 
 object and its idea. As, for example, I find in myself 
 two ideas of the sun quite different : the one has its 
 origin in the senses, and is to be put in the class of 
 those which I have said above come from without ; by 
 which it appears to me extremely small ; the other is 
 drawn from astronomical considerations, that is to 
 say, from certain notions born with me, or at least 
 formed by myself, in whatever way that may be ; by 
 which it appears to me many times greater than the 
 whole earth. Certainly these two ideas which I con- 
 ceive of the sun cannot both be like the same sun ; 
 and reason makes me believe that that which comes 
 immediately from its appearance is the one which 
 least resembles it. 
 
 All this makes me sufficiently aware that, up to this 
 hour, it has not been by a judgment certain and pre- 
 meditated, but solely by a blind and forward impulse, 
 that I have believed that there were things external 
 to myself, and different from my own being, which, 
 by the organs of my senses, or by some other means, 
 whatever it may be, send into me their ideas or images, 
 and imprint there their resemblances.
 
 132 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 * 
 
 But there presents itself still another way of finding 
 out whether, among the things the ideas of which I 
 have in me, there are any which exist externally to 
 me. To wit : if these ideas are considered only in so 
 far as they are certain modes of thought, I do not dis- 
 cover among them any difference or inequality, and 
 all appear to proceed from me in the same way ; but 
 considering them as images, of which some represent 
 one thing and others another, it is evident that 
 they are very different from one another. For, 
 in reality, those which represent to me sub- 
 stances are without doubt something more, and 
 contain in themselves, so to speak, more objective 
 reality,* that is to say, participate by representation 
 in more degrees of being, or perfection, than those 
 which represent to me simply modes or accidents. 
 Moreover, that by which I conceive a God, sovereign, 
 eternal, infinite, immutable, all-knowing, all-powerful, 
 and creator universal of all things external to him- 
 self, this, I say, has certainly in itself more objec- 
 tive reality than those by which finite substances are 
 represented to me. 
 
 Now it is a thing manifest by the natural light that 
 there must be at least as much reality in the efficient 
 and total cause as in its effect, for whence can the 
 effect draw its reality save from its cause, and how 
 could this cause communicate it to it, if it did not 
 have it in itself ? And from this it follows not only 
 that nothing cannot produce anything, but also, that 
 that which is more perfect, that is to say, which con- 
 tains in itself more reality, cannot be a result of or be 
 dependent upon the less perfect. And this truth is not 
 
 * Cf. Reply to Second Objections, Geom. proof, Def. Ill 
 ((Enures, t. i, 452); Veitch, Descartes, p. 267 and Note III, p. 285.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 133 
 
 only clear and evident in the effects which have that 
 reality which philosophers call actual or formal, but 
 also in the ideas wherein is considered simply that 
 reality which they call objective : for example, the 
 stone which has not yet existed not only cannot now 
 begin to be, unless it is produced by something which 
 has in itself formally or eminently* all that which 
 enters into the composition of the stone, that is to 
 say, which contains in itself the same things, or others 
 more excellent than those which are in the stone; and 
 heat cannot be produced in a subject which was be- 
 fore devoid of it unless it be by something which is of 
 an order, a degree, or a kind at least as perfect as heat; 
 and so ojf other things. 
 
 But still, besides that, the idea of heat, or of the 
 stone, cannot be in me, unless it has been put there 
 by some cause which contains in itself as much real- 
 ity as I conceive to be in the heat or in the stone ; 
 for although this cause may not transmit to my idea 
 anything of its own actual or formal reality, it must 
 not on that account be imagined that this cause is 
 less real ; but it must be understood that every idea 
 being a work of the mind, its nature is such that there is 
 not to be demanded of it any other formal reality than 
 that which it receives and borrows from thought, or 
 the mind, of which it is simply a mode, that is to say 
 a manner or way of thinking. But in order that an 
 idea contain one such objective reality rather than 
 another, it must derive this, without doubt, from some 
 cause, in which there exists at least as much of formal 
 reality as this idea contains of objective reality ; for 
 if we suppose that there is found anything in an idea 
 
 * Cf. Reply to Second Objections, Geom. proof, Def. IV (CEu- 
 vres, t. i, p. 452); Veitch, Descartes, p. 268 and Note VII, p. 289.
 
 134 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 which is not met with in its cause, it must then be 
 that it has this from nothing. But imperfect as may 
 be this mode of existence by which a thing exists ob- 
 jectively, or by representation in the understanding 
 through its idea, certainly it cannot, nevertheless, be 
 said that this mode and manner of being is nothing, 
 nor, consequently, that this idea derives its origin 
 from nothing. Nor ought I, moreover, to imagine 
 that, because the reality which I consider in my ideas 
 is only objective, it is not necessary that the same 
 reality should be formally or actually in the causes of 
 these ideas, but that it is enough that it be also ob- 
 jective in them ; because, just as this mode of exist- 
 ing objectively belongs to ideas from their own 
 natures, likewise the manner or mode of existing 
 formally belongs to the causes of these ideas (at least 
 to the first and principal) from their own nature. 
 And although it might happen that one idea should 
 give birth to another idea, this, nevertheless, can- 
 not go on to infinity ; but an end must be reached 
 in a first idea, the cause of which may be the model 
 (patron) or original in which is contained, formally 
 and actually, all the reality or perfection which is 
 found simply objectively, or by representation, in 
 those ideas. 
 
 Consequently, the natural light makes it clearly evi- 
 dent to me that ideas exist in me as pictures or images 
 which may easily fall short of the perfection of the 
 things from which they are derived, but which never 
 can contain anything greater or more perfect. The 
 longer and more carefully I consider all these things 
 the more clearly and distinctly I recognize that they 
 are true. 
 
 But what, finally, shall I conclude from all this ?
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDltATlONS. 13$ 
 
 This : namely, that if the reality or objective perfec- 
 tion of any one of my ideas is such that I know 
 clearly that this same reality or perfection is not in 
 me, neither formally nor eminently, and that, conse- 
 quently, I cannot be the cause of it myself, it follows 
 thence, necessarily, that I am not alone in the world, 
 but that there is also something else which exists and 
 which is the cause of this idea ; whereas, if there were 
 not found in me such an idea, I should have no argu- 
 ment which could convince me and make certain to 
 me the existence of any other thing than myself, for I 
 have examined them all carefully, and I have not been 
 able to find any other up to the present time. 
 
 But among all these ideas which are within me, be- 
 sides those which represent myself to me, in respect 
 to which there cannot be here any difficulty, there 
 is another which represents a God to me ; others, 
 things corporeal and inanimate ; others, angels ; others, 
 animals ; and others, finally, which represent to me 
 men like myself. But, so far as concerns the ideas 
 which represent to me other men, or animals, or 
 angels, I easily conceive that they may be formed by 
 the mixture and composition of ideas that I have of 
 things corporeal and of God, even although besides 
 myself there were no other men in the world, nor any 
 animals, nor any angels. And so far as concerns the 
 ideas of corporeal things, I do not recognize in them 
 anything so great or so excellent as might not possibly 
 have come from myself ; for when I consider them 
 more closely, and examine them in the same way in 
 which I examined yesterday the idea of the wax, I find 
 that there is but a very little in them that I can con- 
 ceive clearly and distinctly ; to wit, magnitude, or, 
 rather, extension in length, breadth, and depth ; figure,
 
 136 THE PHILOSOPHY Of DESCARTES. [P A RT II 
 
 which results from the termination of this extension ; 
 position, which bodies differently shaped hold sever- 
 ally in respect to each other ; and motion, or change of 
 this position, to which there may be added substance, 
 duration, and number. 
 
 As for other things, such as light, colors, sounds, 
 odors, flavors, heat, cold, and other qualities which 
 fall under the sense of touch, they occur in my thought 
 in so much obscurity and confusion that I do not 
 know even whether they are true or false ; that is to 
 say, whether the ideas which I conceive of these quali- 
 ties are indeed ideas of any real things, or whether 
 they represent to me mere chimeras, which cannot 
 exist 
 
 But to speak truly, it is not necessary that I attrib- 
 ute to them any other author than myself ; for if 
 they be false, that is to say, if they represent things 
 which are not, the natural light makes me understand 
 that they proceed from nothing ; that is to say that 
 they are in me only because there is wanting some- 
 thing to my nature, and that it is not wholly perfect ; 
 and if these ideas be true, nevertheless, since they 
 manifest so little reality to me that I cannot distinguish 
 the thing represented from non-being, I do not see 
 why I may not be the author of them. As for the 
 clear and distinct ideas which I have of corporeal 
 things, there are some of them which it seems to 
 me I might have drawn from the idea that I have 
 of myself ; for instance, those I have of substance, 
 of duration, of number, and of other similar things. 
 For when I think that a stone is a substance, or a 
 thing which is capable of existing of itself, and that I 
 am also myself a substance ; although I conceive in- 
 deed that I am a thing which thinks and is not ex-
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 137 
 
 tended, and that the stone, on the contrary, is a thing 
 extended and which does not think, and that thus 
 between these two conceptions there is a notable dif- 
 ference, nevertheless they seem to agree in this re- 
 spect, that they both represent substances. Likewise, 
 when I think that I am now existing, and remember 
 besides having existed before, and when I conceive 
 many diverse thoughts, the number of which I know, 
 I then acquire the ideas within me of duration and 
 number, which, thereafter, I can transfer to all other 
 things as I please. As for the other qualities of 
 which the ideas of corporeal things are composed, to 
 wit, extension, figure, situation, and motion, it is true 
 that they are not formally within me, since I am only 
 a thing which thinks ; but because these are only 
 certain modes of substance, and I myself am a sub- 
 stance, it seems as if they might be contained within 
 me eminently. 
 
 There remains, therefore, the idea of God only, in 
 which it must be considered whether there be any- 
 thing which could not have come from myself. 
 
 By the name God I understand a substance infinite, 
 eternal, immutable, independent, omniscient, omnipo- 
 tent, and by which myself and all other things which 
 are (if it be true that any of these exist) have been 
 created and produced. But these prerogatives are so 
 great and so exalted that the more attentively I con- 
 sider them, the less am I persuaded that the idea 
 which I have of them can derive its origin from my- 
 self alone. And consequently it must necessarily be 
 inferred from all that I have said before that God 
 exists : for although the idea of substance may be in 
 me from the fact that I am a substance ; nevertheless 
 I, who am a finite being, should not have the idea of
 
 138 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 an infinite substance, if it had not been put into me 
 by some substance which was in reality infinite. 
 
 And I ought not to imagine that I do not conceive 
 the infinite by a true idea, but solely by the negation 
 of what is finite, just as I comprehend rest and dark- 
 ness by the negation of motion and of light; since on 
 the contrary I see clearly that there is more reality in 
 infinite substance than in finite substance, and, accord- 
 ingly, that I have in me, in a certain sense, rather the 
 notion of the infinite than of the finite ; for how could 
 it be that I should know that I doubt and that I desire, 
 that is to say, that anything is wanting to me, and that 
 I am not in every respect perfect, unless I had in me 
 some idea of an existence more perfect than my own, 
 by comparison with which I should recognize the de- 
 fects of my own nature. 
 
 And it cannot be said that perhaps this idea is ma- 
 terially false, and consequently that I may derive it 
 from nothing, that is to say, that it may exist in me 
 because I have some defect, as I have already said of 
 the ideas of heat and cold, and other similar things ; 
 for, on the contrary, this idea being clear and very dis. 
 tinct, and containing in itself more objective reality 
 than any other, there is none which is in itself more 
 true, or which can less be suspected of error and 
 falsity. 
 
 This idea, I say, of a being supremely perfect and 
 infinite, is very true ; for although one may feign that 
 such a being does not exist, one, nevertheless, cannot 
 feign that the idea of it does not represent anything 
 real to me, as I said above of the idea of cold. It is 
 also very clear and very distinct, since all that my 
 mind conceives clearly and distinctly of reality and 
 truth, and which contains in itself any perfection, is
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 139 
 
 contained and summed up in this idea. And this still 
 remains true, although I do not comprehend the in- 
 finite, and there exists in God an infinitude of things 
 which I cannot comprehend, nor perhaps even attain 
 to any conception of them whatever, because it is of 
 the nature of the infinite that I, who am finite and 
 limited, cannot comprehend it ; and it is enough that 
 I well understand this, and that I judge that all things 
 that I conceive clearly, and in which I know there 
 is any perfection, and perhaps also an infinitude of 
 other things of which I am ignorant, are in God form- 
 ally or eminently, to render the idea which I have of 
 him the most true, the most clear, and the most dis- 
 tinct of all that are in my mind.* 
 
 But it may be also that I am something more than 
 I imagine, and that all the perfections which I attrib- 
 ute to the nature of a God are in some manner in 
 me potentially, though they have not yet presented 
 themselves and become manifest by their activity. 
 Indeed, I am aware already that my knowledge in- 
 creases and grows more perfect little by little, and I 
 do not see anything to prevent its increasing thus 
 more and more even to infinity ; nor even why, when 
 it has thus increased and grown perfect, I should not 
 be able to acquire by means of it all the other perfec- 
 tions of the Divine nature; nor, finally, why the capacity 
 which I have for the acquisition of these perfections 
 if it be true that it now exists within me should not 
 be sufficient to produce the ideas of them. 
 
 Nevertheless, on looking a little more closely at it, 
 
 I perceive that this cannot be ; for, in the first place, 
 
 although it may be true that my knowledge acquires 
 
 every day new degrees of perfection, and that there 
 
 * Cf. Kuno Fischer's Descartes (trans.), p. 358.
 
 140 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART 1 1 
 
 may be in my nature many things potentially which 
 are not yet there in actuality, nevertheless, none of 
 these endowments pertain, nor do they in any degree 
 approximate, to the idea which I h#ve of Divinity, in 
 whom nothing is found merely in potentiality, but all 
 is there in actuality and reality. And, indeed, is it 
 not an infallible and very evident proof of imperfec- 
 tion in my knowledge, that it increases little by little 
 and by degrees is enlarged ? Moreover, although my 
 knowledge might become enlarged more and more, 
 still I do not fail to perceive that it could not become 
 actually infinite, since it will never arrive at so high 
 a point of perfection that it would not still be capable 
 of making further progress. 
 
 But I conceive God as actually infinite in so high 
 a degree that there can be nothing added to the su- 
 preme perfection which he possesses. And, finally, I 
 very well understand that the objective existence of 
 an idea cannot be caused by a being which exists 
 barely potentially, but solely by one which exists form- 
 ally or actually. And certainly, in all that I have 
 just said, I do not see anything which may not be 
 very easily comprehended by natural light on the part 
 of those who are willing to think upon it carefully ; 
 but, when I relax my attention a little, my mind be- 
 comes obscured, and, as it were, blinded by the images 
 of sensible objects, so that it does not readily recall 
 the reason why the idea which I have of a being more 
 perfect than my own must necessarily have been put 
 in me by a being who is in reality more perfect. 
 
 It is for this reason that I wish to go on further and 
 to consider whether I, who have this idea of God, 
 could exist in case there were no God. And I ask, 
 from whom have I my existence ? Perhaps from
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 141 
 
 self, or from my parents, or from other causes less 
 perfect than Go.d ; for nothing can be imagined more 
 perfect nor even equal to him. But if I were inde- 
 pendent of every other, and if I had been myself the 
 author of my being, I should not_have any_doubts f I 
 should not be conscious of desires, and, in fine, there 
 would not be wanting to me any perfection ; for I 
 should have endowed myself with all those of which 
 I have in myself any idea, and accordingly I should 
 be God. And I ought not to imagine that the things 
 which are wanting to me are, perhaps, more difficult to 
 acquire than those which I already possess ; for, on 
 the contrary, it is very certain that it had been much 
 more difficult that I that is to say, a thing or sub- 
 stance which thinks should proceed from nothing, 
 than that I should acquire light and knowledge of 
 many things] of which I am ignorant, and which are 
 
 only accidents of this substance 
 
 And although I might suppose that I had always 
 been as I am now, I cannot in that case escape the 
 force of this reasoning and fail to perceive that it is 
 necessary that God should be the author of my exist- 
 ence. For the whole duration of my life might be 
 divided into an infinitude of parts, each one of them 
 being dependent in no manner on the rest ; and so, 
 from the fact that I have existed just before, it does 
 not follow that I must now exist, except as some 
 cause at this moment produces me and creates me, 
 so to say, anew ; that is to say, preserves me. In 
 reality, it is a thing very clear and very evident to 
 all those who will consider with attention the nature 
 of time, that a substance, for its preservation during 
 all the moments of its duration, requires the same 
 power and the same act which would be necessary to
 
 142 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 produce it and to create it de novo if it did not al- 
 ready exist ; so that it is something which the natural 
 light makes us see clearly, that conservation and 
 creation differ only in respect to our thought, and 
 not in reality. 
 
 I have, then, at this point only to ask myself and 
 make appeal to myself, to see whether I have in me 
 any power and any virtue, by means of which I could 
 cause that I who now exist should exist a moment 
 afterward ; because, since I am nothing but a thing 
 which thinks (or at least, since up to this time nothing 
 further has been considered than precisely this part 
 of myself), if such a power did reside in me, surely I 
 ought at least to conceive it and to have knowledge of 
 it ; but I am not_awareof any such thing in me, and 
 from that I know evidently that I depend upon some 
 being other than myself. 
 
 But it may be that this being on whom I depend 
 is not God, and that I was produced either by my 
 parents or by some other causes less perfect than he 
 is. But this cannot be true ; for, as I have already 
 said, it is a thing very evident that there must be at 
 least as much reality in the cause as in its effect ; and 
 consequently, since I am a thing which thinks and I 
 have in me some idea of a God, whatever may be the 
 ultimate cause of my being, it must necessarily be 
 admitted that it is also a thing which thinks, and that 
 it has in itself the idea of all the perfections which I 
 attribute to God. Then must the inquiry be renewed, 
 whether this cause derives its origin and its existence 
 from itself, or from something else. Because, if it 
 derive it from itself, it follows, from reasons which I 
 have already advanced, that this cause is God ; since, 
 having the power to be and to exist of itself, it must have
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 143 
 
 also without doubt the power to possess in actuality 
 all the perfections of which it has in itself the ideas, 
 that is to say, all those which I conceive to be in God. 
 But if it derive its existence from some other cause 
 than itself, it must be inquired anew, for the same 
 reason, of this second cause, whether it exists of itself 
 or through another, until, step by step, at last an ulti- 
 mate cause is reached, which will prove to be God. 
 And it is very manifest that in this there can be no 
 infinite regression, seeing that the question here is 
 not so much as to the cause which at some other time 
 brought me into being, as concerning that which at 
 the present moment keeps jue-in_being. 
 
 It cannot be supposed, further, that possibly many 
 causes together have concurred in producing me, and 
 that from one I have received the idea of one of the 
 perfections which I attribute to God, from another the 
 idea of some other, consequently that all these per- 
 fections are to be found, indeed, somewhere in the uni- 
 verse, but are not to be met with united and collected 
 in one sole being, which is God ; because, on the con- 
 trary, the unity, the simplicity, or the inseparability of 
 all things which are in God is one of the principal 
 perfections which I conceive to exist in him ; and 
 surely the idea of this unity of all the perfections of 
 God could not have been put into me by any cause 
 from which I did not also receive the ideas of all the 
 other perfections ; because it could not have brought it 
 about that I should comprehend all _these joined to- 
 gether and inseparable, without having caused, conse- 
 quently, at the same time, that I should know what 
 they were, and that I should become acquainted with 
 all of them in some degree. 
 
 Finally, so far as concerns my parents, to whom it
 
 144 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 appears that I owe my birth, although all that I ever 
 could believe of them were true, it nevertheless could 
 not be true that it is they who keep me in existence, 
 nor even who made me and brought me forth in so far 
 as I am a thing which thinks ; there being no relation 
 between the corporeal action by which I am accus- 
 tomed to believe that they engendered me, and the 
 production of such a substance ; but what they at the 
 most contributed to my birth is that they put certain 
 dispositions into this matter in which I have judged 
 up to this time that I that is to say, my mind, which 
 alone I now take to be myself is inclosed ; and ac- 
 cordingly there cannot be here any difficulty in regard 
 to them, but it must necessarily be concluded, from 
 the fact alone that I exist, and that the idea of a being 
 supremely perfect that is to say, of God is in me, 
 the existence of God is very evidently demonstrated.* 
 There remains only to inquire how I have come by 
 this idea, for I did not receive it through the senses, 
 and it never presented itself contrary to my expecta- 
 tions, as the idea of sensible things commonly do, when 
 these things present themselves, or seem to do so, to 
 the exterior organs of sense ; it is not, moreover, a 
 
 * For other statements of the argument for the being of God, 
 see Discours de la Mtthode, pt. IV, (Euvres, t. i, pp. 159-163 ; 
 Veitch's trans., pp. 34-37 ; Principcs, i, 18-22, (Euvres, t. iii, pp. 
 74-78 ; Veitch's trans., pp. 201-203 ', Obj. et Rep., Props. I-III, 
 (Euvres, t. i, pp. 460-462 ; Veitch's trans. , App., pp. 271 272. 
 
 The above form of the argument, which is styled by Kuno 
 Fischer (Descartes, trans., p. 349) the anthropological proof, and 
 of which he remarks, "It is the real Cartesian proof of the 
 existence of God," should be compared with the strictly ontological 
 proof in the Fifth Meditation. The former demonstration is a 
 posteriori, its principle being the law of causality ; the latter is a 
 priori, and finds the existence in the idea of God. See below.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 145 
 
 pure product or fiction of my mind, for it is not in my 
 power to diminish or to add to it ; and, consequently, 
 there remains nothing else to be said but that this 
 idea was born and produced with me at the time when 
 I was created, just as was the idea of myself. And, 
 indeed, it should not be thought strange that God, in 
 creating me, should have put into me this idea to be, 
 as it were, the mark of the workman impressed upon 
 his work ; and moreover it is not necessary that this 
 mark should be anything different from this work it- 
 self ; but from the simple fact that God created me it 
 is very credible that he made me in some manner in 
 his own image and likeness ; and that I conceive this 
 resemblance, in which the idea of God is found con- 
 tained, by the same faculty by which I conceive my- 
 self, that is to say that, when I reflect upon myself, 
 not only do I take note that I am a thing imperfect, 
 incomplete, and dependent upon another, which strives 
 and aspires, without ceasing, toward something greater 
 and better than I am, but I recognize also, at the same 
 time, that he upon whom I depend possesses in him- 
 self all these great things to which I aspire, and of 
 which I find in myself the ideas, not indefinitely and 
 merely potentially, but that he has them in reality, 
 actually and infinitely, and, therefore, that he is God. 
 And the entire force of the argument which I have 
 here employed to prove the existence of God consists 
 in this, that I recognize the impossibility that my nature 
 should be what it is that is to say, that I should have 
 in me the idea of a God, if God did not in truth exist ; 
 that same God, I say, of whom there is in me the idea, 
 that is to say, who possesses all these high perfections 
 of which our mind can have even any faint idea with- 
 out being able, however, to comprehend them, who is
 
 146 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 subject to no defects, and who has none of all those 
 things which imply imperfection. Whence it is clear 
 enough that he cannot be a deceiver, since the natural 
 light teaches us that deception necessarily depends on 
 some defect.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 147 
 
 FOURTH MEDITATION. 
 
 Of the true and the false. 
 
 .... ALREADY it seems to me that I am finding a 
 path which will conduct us from the contemplation of 
 this true God in whom are hid all the treasures of knowl- 
 edge and wisdom to the knowledge of the rest of the 
 universe. For, in the first place, I perceive that it is 
 impossible for him ever to deceive me, since in all 
 fraud and deceit there exists some sort of imperfec- 
 tion ; and although the ability to deceive may be a 
 mark of subtlety or of power, nevertheless the wish to 
 deceive shows unmistakable weakness or malice ; and, 
 therefore, it cannot be found in God. In the next 
 place, I know by my own experience that there exists 
 in me a certain faculty of judging, or of discriminating 
 the true from the false, which without doubt I have 
 received from God, as well as all the rest of the things 
 which are in me and which I possess ; and since it is 
 impossible that he should wish to deceive me, it is 
 also certain that he [has not bestowed upon me such 
 a faculty that I could ever fall into error so long as I 
 should use it rightly. There would remain no doubt 
 on this point, except that, apparently, this conse- 
 quence might follow, that in this case I could never 
 deceive myself ; because, if all that is in me comes 
 from God, and if he has not put in me any faculty of 
 error, it would appear that I should never make a mis- 
 take. And, indeed, it is true that, whenever I look
 
 148 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 upon myself solely as coming from God, and turn my- 
 self wholly toward him, I do not discover in myself 
 any cause of error or untruth ; but immediately after- 
 ward, on returning to myself, experience makes me 
 aware that I am, nevertheless, liable to an infinitude of 
 errors, on seeking the cause of which I observe that 
 there is present to my thought not only a real and 
 positive idea of God, or, rather, of a being supremely 
 perfect ; but also, so to speak, a certain negative idea 
 of non-entity, that is to say, of that which is infinitely 
 removed from every sort of perfection ; and that I 
 am, as it were, a mean between God and non-entity, 
 that is to say, placed in some sort betwixt the Su- 
 preme Being and the non-existent, so that in truth 
 there can be found in me nothing which could lead 
 me into error, in so far as a Supreme Being has made 
 me ; but if I consider myself as participating in some 
 sort in non-entity or non-being, that is to say in so far 
 as I am not myself the Supreme Being, and that many 
 things are wanting to me, I find myself exposed to 
 an infinitude of defects ; so that I ought not to be 
 surprised if I fall into mistakes. And thus I perceive 
 that error, in so far as it is such, is nothing real which 
 depends upon God, but is solely a defect ; and there- 
 fore, in order to err, I do not need a faculty which 
 should be given me by God particularly for this end ; 
 but my deceiving myself arises from the fact that the 
 power which God has given me to discriminate the 
 false does not exist in me in an infinite degree. Nev- 
 ertheless I am not yet quite satisfied, for error is not 
 a pure negation, that is to say, it is not the simple 
 absence or defect of some perfection which does not 
 belong to me, but it is a privation of some knowledge 
 which it seems as if I ought to have. But on consid-
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 149 
 
 ering the nature of God, it does not seem possible 
 that he should have put into me any faculty which was 
 not perfect of its kind, that is to say, which should 
 want any perfection which belongs to it ; for, if it be 
 true that the more expert the artisan, the more per- 
 fect and complete are the works which come from his 
 hands, what thing can have been produced by the 
 Sovereign Creator of the universe which was not per- 
 fect and entirely finished in all its parts ? And, surely, 
 there is no doubt at all but that God might have 
 created me such that I could never have made mis- 
 takes ; it is certain, also, that he wills always that 
 which is the best ; is it, then, better that I should be 
 able to deceive myself than that I should not have the 
 power to do so ? On considering this point attentively 
 it occurs to my mind at once that I ought not to be 
 surprised if I am not capable of understanding why 
 God does what he does, and that I ought not on that 
 account to doubt of his existence, since, perhaps, I see 
 by experience many other things which exist, although 
 I cannot understand for what reason or how God made 
 them; for knowing already that my nature is extremely 
 weak and limited, and that the nature of God, on the 
 contrary, is boundless, incomprehensible, and infinite, 
 I can easily see that there is an infinitude of things 
 within his power the causes of which tie beyond the 
 range of my mind ; and this reason alone is sufficient 
 to persuade me that all that kind of causes, which is 
 commonly derived from the end, is of no use in things 
 physical or natural ; for it does not seem to me that I 
 can without temerity pry into and try to discover the 
 impenetrable purposes of God.* 
 
 * We shall not, also, stop to inquire after the ends which God 
 proposed to himself in creating the world, and we entirely exclude
 
 150 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 Moreover it further occurs to my mind that a single 
 creature should not be considered separately, when 
 inquiry is made whether the works of God are perfect, 
 but generally all creatures taken together ; because 
 the very same thing which might with some sort of 
 reason seem very imperfect, if it were the only thing 
 in existence, might not fail of being very perfect, 
 when considered as forming a part of the whole uni- 
 verse * ; and although, since I have formed the plan 
 of doubting everything, I might not certainly know 
 aught beyond my own existence and that of God, 
 nevertheless also, since I have become aware of the 
 infinite power of God, I cannot deny that he has pro- 
 duced many other things, consequently that I exist 
 and am placed in the world as forming a part of the 
 universal whole of being. 
 
 In the next place, on looking at myself more closely, 
 and considering what my errors are, which of them- 
 selves bear witness that there is imperfection in me, I 
 find that they depend on the concurrence of two 
 causes, to wit, the faculty of knowing which is in me 
 
 from our philosophy the investigation of final causes ; for we 
 should not be so arrogant as to presume that God desired to impart 
 to us his plans ; but, while regarding him as the author of all 
 things, we shall attempt simply to discover, through the faculty of 
 reasoning he has put within us, how the things which we perceive 
 by the medium of our senses might have been produced ; and we 
 shall be warranted, by those of his attributes of which he has willed 
 that we have some knowledge, that what we shall have once per- 
 ceived clearly and distinctly to belong to the nature of these things 
 has the perfection of being true. Principes, I, 28 ((Euvres, t. iii, 
 p. 81). 
 
 *This thought was elaborated by Leibnitz in his Thtodich 
 and forms the principal support of his optimistic theory. Cf, 
 Butler's Analogy, pt. i, ch. vii.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 151 
 
 and the faculty of choosing, or rather of my free will, 
 that is to say, upon my understanding and my will 
 together. For by the understanding alone I do not 
 affirm nor deny anything, but I simply conceive the 
 ideas of things, which I can affirm or deny. But 
 when considering the matter thus strictly, one may 
 say that he does not find in himself any error, provided 
 the term error is taken in its proper signification. 
 
 And although there may be an infinity of things in 
 the world of which I have no idea in my understand- 
 ing, it cannot be said on that account that it is de- 
 prived of these ideas, as of something properly be- 
 longing to its nature, but simply that it does not have 
 them ; because, in truth, there is no reason by which 
 it could be shown that God ought to have given me a 
 greater and more ample faculty of knowing than that 
 which he has given me ; and no matter how skillful 
 and wise the workman I represent to myself, I am 
 not bound for that reason to think that he ought to 
 put into each one of his works all those perfections 
 that he may put into some of them. Also, I cannot 
 complain that God did not give me a free will, or a 
 will ample and perfect enough, since in reality I find 
 it so ample and so far-reaching that it is not inclosed 
 within any bounds. And what appears to me here 
 quite remarkable is that of all other things which 
 exist within me there is none so perfect and so great 
 that I am not well aware that it might be still greater 
 and more perfect. For, for example, if I consider 
 the faculty of conceiving which is in me, I find that 
 it has a very narrow range and is greatly limited, and 
 at the same time I represent to myself the idea of an- 
 other faculty much more ample and even infinite ; 
 and from the simple fact that I can represent to my-
 
 l2 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 self the idea of it, I easily perceive that it belongs to 
 the nature of God. In the same way, if I examine 
 memory or imagination, or whatever other faculty 
 there may be in me, I do not find any that is not very 
 small and limited, and which in God is not immense 
 and infinite. 
 
 It is will alone, or freedom of choice, that I find to 
 be in me so great that I do not conceive the idea of 
 anything else greater or of wider range ; so that it is 
 this chiefly which makes me know that I bear the image 
 and likeness of God. Because, although it may be in- 
 comparably greater in God than in me, whether on 
 account of the knowledge and the power which are 
 joined with it and which make it more steadfast and 
 efficient, or on account of its object, inasmuch as it 
 directs itself and extends itself to an infinitely greater 
 number of things, nevertheless it does not seem to me 
 to be any greater, if I consider it formally and strictly 
 in itself. For it consists simply in this, that we are 
 able to do a thing or not to do it, that is to say, to 
 affirm or deny, to pursue or avoid the same thing, or 
 rather it consists solely in this, that in affirming or 
 denying, in pursuing or avoiding the things which 
 understanding presents to us, we act in such a manner 
 that we do not feel ourselves constrained by any ex- 
 ternal force. For, that I may be free, it is not neces- 
 sary that I should be indifferent in .choosing one or 
 the other of two contrary things ; but rather, the more 
 I incline toward one, whether it be that I clearly know 
 that the good and the true meet in it, or that God 
 thus disposes my thought within me, by so much the 
 more freely do I choose and embrace it ; and surely 
 divine grace and natural knowledge, far from diminish- 
 ing my liberty, the rather increase and strengthen it ;
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 153 
 
 so that this indifference which I feel when I am not 
 carried toward one side rather than toward another 
 by the weight of any reason, is the lowest degree of 
 liberty, and makes apparent rather a defect in knowl- 
 edge than a perfection in will ; for if I always knew 
 clearly the true and the good, I should never be at 
 any loss to decide what judgment and what choice I 
 ought to make ; and thus I should be entirely free 
 without ever being indifferent. 
 
 From all this I perceive that neither the power of 
 willing, which I have received from God, is of itself 
 the cause of my errors, for it is very ample and very 
 perfect in its kind, nor also the power of understand- 
 ing or conceiving ; for, not conceiving anything except 
 by means of that power which God has given me for 
 conceiving, without doubt, all that I conceive, I con- 
 ceive as it should be, and it is not possible that in that I 
 should deceive myself. Whence, then, arise my errors ? 
 It is from this circumstance alone, that the will being 
 much more ample and far-reaching than the under- 
 standing, I do not keep it within the same limits, but I 
 extend it also to things which I do not understand ; 
 to which being of itself indifferent, it very easily goes 
 astray, and chooses the false in place of the true, and 
 the evil in place of the good ; and that is what causes 
 me to err and to sin.* 
 
 For example, upon examining during these days 
 just gone by whether anything truly existed in the 
 world, and becoming aware that, from the simple fact 
 that I had raised that question, it followed very evi- 
 dently that I myself existed, I could not avoid the 
 conclusion that what I conceived so clearly was true; 
 
 *Cf. Princ., Pt. I, 31-44. See Veitch, trans, pp. 207-2x2.
 
 154 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 not that I found myself forced to it by any external 
 cause, but solely because upon a great clearness in my 
 understanding * there followed a strong inclination in 
 my will ; and I was inclined the more freely to believe 
 this, in proportion as I felt the less indifference. On 
 the contrary, now I do not know solely that I exist, in 
 so far as I am something which thinks ; but there is 
 present also to my mind a certain idea of the corpo- 
 real nature ; which makes me question whether this 
 nature which thinks, which is within me, or rather 
 which I myself am, is different from this corporeal na- 
 ture, or whether both are not one and the same ; and 
 I assume here that I know as yet of no reason to in- 
 cline me to the one view rather than to the other : 
 whence it follows that I am entirely indifferent as re- 
 gards a denial or an affirmation, or, indeed, as to 
 whether I abstain from any judgment in the matter. 
 
 * Cf. Hobbes' objection and Descartes' reply ((Euvres, t. i, pp. 
 496-498). 
 
 Objection. This way of speaking, a great clearness in the un- 
 derstanding, is metaphorical, and accordingly is not fit to intro- 
 duce into an argument : now he who has no doubt pretends to 
 have such a clearness, and his will has no less inclination to af- 
 firm that of which he has no doubt than has the man who pos- 
 sesses perfect knowledge. This clearness, then, may very well be 
 the cause why a man shall hold and obstinately defend any opin- 
 ion, but it can never make him know with certainty that it is 
 true. [Cf. Mahaffy's remarks, Descartes, p. 96.] 
 
 Reply. It matters little whether this way of speaking be fit or 
 not to introduce into an argument, provided it be fit to express 
 clearly our thought, as it does. For there is nobody who does not 
 know that by this word, a clearness in the understanding, is meant 
 a clearness or perspicuity of knowledge that not everyone who 
 thinks possesses ; but that does not prevent its being altogether 
 different from an obstinate opinion conceived without evident per- 
 ception.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 155 
 
 And this indifference extends not merely to things 
 concerning which the understanding has no knowl- 
 edge, but in general also to all things which it does 
 not discover with perfect clearness at the moment 
 when the will deliberates upon them ; for, however 
 probable may be the conjectures which incline me to 
 pass a judgment, the simple recognition of the fact 
 that they are only conjectures, and not certain and 
 indubitable reasons, is enough to afford me occasion 
 to pass an opposite judgment, and this I have had suf- 
 ficient experience of during these days just passed, 
 when I have set down as false all that I have hitherto 
 held to be quite true, simply because I have observed 
 that some doubt could be entertained in regard to it. 
 
 Now if I abstain from passing judgment upon any- 
 thing, so long as I do not conceive it with sufficient 
 clearness and distinctness, it is manifest that I do 
 well, and that I am not deceived ; but if I allow my- 
 self to deny or affirm, then I do not use my free will 
 as I ought ; and if I affirm what is not true, it is evi- 
 dent that I deceive myself ; and likewise, although I 
 judge according to truth, that happens only by chance, 
 and I still go wrong and make bad use of my free- 
 dom ; for the natural light teaches us that the knowl- 
 edge of the understanding ought always to precede 
 the determination of the will.* And it is in this bad 
 use of freedom that the privation is found which 
 forms the essence of error. 
 
 Privation, I say, is found in the act so far as it pro- 
 ceeds from myself, but it is not found in the faculties 
 which I have received from God, nor even in the act 
 in so far as it depends upon him. For certainly 1 have 
 
 *Cf. Abelard's dictum : Non credendum, nisi prius intellectum. 
 Introd. ii, 3 Shedd's His!, of Chr. Doct., vol. i, p. 186.
 
 156 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART It 
 
 no ground for complaint in that God has not given 
 me an intelligence more ample, or a natural light 
 more perfect, than that which he has bestowed upon 
 me, since it is of the nature of a finite understanding 
 not to comprehend many things, and of the nature of 
 a created understanding to be finite ; but I have every 
 reason to render thanks to him in that, while he owed 
 nothing whatever, he has yet given me all the few per- 
 fections there are in me ; and I am far from enter- 
 taining sentiments so unjust as to imagine that he has 
 deprived me of, or unjustly held back from me, other 
 perfections with which he has not endowed me. 
 
 I have likewise no ground for complaint in that he 
 has given me a will more ample in its range than my 
 understanding, since the will consisting only in a 
 single thing, and, as it were, in something indivisible, 
 it appears that its nature is such that nothing could 
 be taken from it without destroying it ; and surely the 
 more range it has, the more cause have I to thank the 
 goodness of him who gave it me. 
 
 And finally, I ought not to complain on the ground 
 that God concurs with me in producing the acts of 
 this will, that is to say, judgments in which I deceive 
 myself, because these acts are entirely true and abso- 
 lutely good, in so far as they depend upon God, and 
 there is in some sort more perfection in my nature, in 
 that I am able to perform them, than if I were not 
 able to do so. As for privation, in which alone con- 
 sists the formal cause of error and of sin, that does 
 not require any concurrence of God, because it is not 
 a thing or a being, and if it be referred to God as its 
 cause, it should not be called privation, but simply 
 negation, according to the signification given to these 
 terms in the school. For in reality it is no imperfec-
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 157 
 
 tion in God that he has given me the liberty of pass- 
 ing judgment, or of not doing so, on certain things 
 concerning which he has not put a clear and dis- 
 tinct knowledge in my understanding ; but, without 
 doubt, it is in me an imperfection that I do not use 
 well this liberty, and that I rashly give my judgment 
 upon things which I conceive only obscurely and 
 confusedly. 
 
 I see, nevertheless, that it would be easy for God to 
 cause that I never should fall into error, although I 
 still remained free and limited in my knowledge : 
 thus, if he had given to my understanding a clear and 
 distinct knowledge of all the things on which I should 
 ever have to deliberate, or, if you please, if he had 
 engraved on my memory, so deeply that I never could 
 forget it, the resolution never to judge of anything 
 without clearly and distinctly conceiving it. And, 
 indeed, I admit that, in so far as I consider myself 
 alone, as if there were no other than myself in the 
 world, I should have been much more perfect than I 
 am, if God had so created me that I should never 
 have erred ; but I cannot, for that, deny that it would 
 be in some sort a greater perfection in the universe 
 if some of its parts should not be exempt from defect, 
 while others were, than if they all should be alike.* 
 And I have no right to complain that God, when he 
 put me into the world, did not choose to put me into 
 the rank of things most noble and most perfect ; 
 rather, I have reason to be content with this, that if 
 he has not granted to me the perfection of not falling 
 into error, by the first means, which I have mentioned 
 above, which depends on a clear and certain knowledge 
 of all the things on which I may deliberate, he has at 
 * See above, p. 150.
 
 158 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 least left in my power the other means, which is firmly 
 to keep the resolution never to give my judgment on 
 things the truth concerning which is not clearly known 
 to me ; for, although I experience in myself this weak- 
 ness of not being able to hold my mind constantly to 
 one thought, I am, nevertheless, able, by attentive and 
 often repeated meditation, to impress it so strongly on 
 my memory that I never fail to recollect it whenever 
 I have need of it, and thus to acquire the habit of 
 not making mistakes ; and, inasmuch as in this con- 
 sists the greatest and principal perfection of man, I 
 consider that I have gained not a little to-day, in hav- 
 ing discovered the cause of error and falsity.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 159 
 
 FIFTH MEDITATION. 
 
 Of the essence of material things ; and, again, of the 
 existence of God. 
 
 MANY other things remain to me to be considered 
 in regard to the attributes of God, and in regard to my 
 own nature, that is to say, that of my mind ; but per- 
 haps I will renew the inquiry at another time. At 
 present, having observed what it is necessary to do or 
 to avoid, in order to arrive at a knowledge of truth, 
 what I have principally to do is to attempt to advance 
 and deliver myself of all the doubts into which I have 
 fallen in these past days, and to see if I cannot know 
 something certain in regard to material things. But 
 before I inquire whether there are such things exist- 
 ing without me, I ought to consider the ideas of them, 
 in so far as they exist in my thought, and to see what 
 are distinct and what are confused. In the first place, 
 I distinctly imagine that quantity which philosophers 
 call continuous quantity, or rather the extension in 
 length, breadth, and thickness which is in this quan- 
 tity, or rather in the thing to which they attribute it. 
 
 Moreover, I can enumerate in it many different 
 parts, and attribute to each one of these parts all sorts 
 of magnitudes, figures, positions, and movements ; and 
 finally, I can assign to each of these movements all 
 sorts of duration. And I recognize these things with 
 distinctness not only when I consider them thus in 
 general ; but also, for the little time that I have given 
 my attention to it, I have come to recognize an in-
 
 l6o THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 finitude of particulars in regard to numbers, figures, 
 motions, and other similar things, the truth of 
 which makes itself apparent with so much evidence, 
 and accords so well with my nature, that when I be- 
 gin to discover them it does not seem to me that I am 
 learning anything new, but rather that I am recalling 
 to mind something which I knew before ;* that is to say, 
 that 1 become conscious of things which were already 
 in my mind, although I had not yet turned my thought 
 toward them. And of what I find here the most im- 
 portant is that I discover in myself an infinitude of 
 ideas of certain things which cannot be regarded as a 
 pure non-entity, although perhaps they have no exist- 
 ence outside my thought ; and things which are 
 not mere fancies of mine, although I am at liberty 
 to think them or not to think them ; but which have 
 a true and unchangeable nature. As, for example, 
 when I imagine a triangle, although there may not be 
 anywhere in the world, outside my thought, such a 
 figure, nor ever have been, there is not wanting, 
 nevertheless, a certain nature, form, or determinate 
 essence of this figure, which is immutable and eternal, 
 which I did not invent, and which does not depend in 
 any way on my mind ; as appears from the fact that 
 there may be demonstrated divers properties of this 
 triangle, to wit, that its three angles are equal to two 
 right angles, that its greatest angle is subtended by 
 its greatest side, and other similar truths, which now, 
 whether I will or no, I recognize very clearly and very 
 evidently as being in it, although I had not before 
 thought of it in this way when for the first time 
 
 * Cf. Plato, doctrine of reminiscence. Meno, 81 ; Jowett's 
 trans., vol. i. p. 283, Oxford ed.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 161 
 
 I imagined a triangle ; and accordingly it cannot 
 be said that I have fancied or invented these 
 things. 
 
 And I make nothing here of the objection that per- 
 haps this idea of the triangle has come into mind 
 through the medium of my senses, from my having 
 seen sometimes bodies of a triangular shape ; for I can 
 form in my mind an infinitude of other figures, of 
 which there cannot be the least suspicion that they 
 ever fell under the observation of my senses, and yet 
 I should not be wanting in power to demonstrate 
 divers properties belonging to their nature, as well as 
 those which belong to that of the triangle ; which, 
 certainly, must all be true, since I clearly conceive 
 them ; and therefore they are something, and not 
 pure non-entity ; for it is very evident that everything 
 that is true is something, truth being identical with 
 existence ; and I have already fully demonstrated 
 above that all things that I clearly and distinctly know 
 are true. And although I had not demonstrated it, 
 nevertheless the nature of my mind is such that I can- 
 not restrain myself from regarding them as true so 
 long as I conceive them clearly and distinctly ; and I 
 remind myself that at the very time when I was still 
 strongly bound to the objects of sense I set down 
 among the most certain truths those which I con- 
 ceive clearly and distinctly in regard to figures, 
 mimbers, and the other things which belong to arith- 
 metic and geometry. 
 
 But now, if from the simple fact that I can draw from 
 my thought the idea of anything it follows that all that 
 I recognize clearly and distinctly to pertain to this 
 thing pertains to it in reality, can I not draw from
 
 162 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 this an argument and a demonstration of the exis- 
 tence of God ?* It is certain that I do not find in me 
 the less the idea of him, that is, of a being supremely 
 perfect, than that of any figure or of any number 
 whatever ; and I do not know less clearly and distinctly 
 that an actual and eternal existence belongs to his na- 
 ture than I know that all that I can demonstrate of any 
 figure or of any number belongs truly to the nature of 
 that figure or that number : and accordingly, although 
 all that I have concluded in the preceding meditations 
 may not turn out to be true, the existence of God 
 ought to pass in my mind as being at least as certain 
 as I have up to this time regarded the truths of mathe- 
 matics to be, which have to do only with numbers 
 and figures : although, indeed, that might not seem 
 at first to be perfectly evident, but might appear to have 
 some appearance of sophistry. For being accus- 
 tomed in all other things to make a distinction be- 
 tween existence and essence, I easily persuade myself 
 that existence may perhaps be separated from the es- 
 sence of God, and thus God might be conceived as 
 not existent actually. But nevertheless, when I think 
 more attentively, I find that existence can no more 
 be separated from the essence of God than from 
 the essence of a rectilinear triangle can be separated 
 the equality of its three angles to two right angles, 
 or, indeed, if you please, from the idea of a moun- 
 tain the idea of a valley ; so that there would be 
 
 * Cf. argument in Med. Ill, above, pp. 126-146. 
 
 For a statement of the difference between the ontological ar- 
 gument of Descartes and that of St. Thomas (of Anselm originally) 
 see the Reply to Caterus ((Euvres, t. i, p. 389). The Anselmic 
 argument (Proslogion, c. 2, 4) may be found stated in Shedd's 
 Hist, of Chr. Doct., vol. i, p. 231 et seq.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 163 
 
 no less contradiction in conceiving of a God that 
 is, of a being supremely perfect, to whom existence 
 was wanting, that is to say, to whom there was want- 
 ing any perfection than in conceiving of a mountain 
 which had no valley. 
 
 But although, in reality, I might not be able to con- 
 ceive of a God without existence, no more than of a 
 mountain without a valley, nevertheless, as from the 
 simple fact that I conceive a mountain with a valley, 
 it does not follow that there exists any mountain in the 
 world, so likewise, although I conceive God as exist- 
 ent, it does not follow, it seems, from that, that God 
 exists, for my thought does not impose any necessity 
 on things ; and as there is nothing to prevent my 
 imagining a winged horse, although there is none 
 which has wings, so I might, perhaps, be able to at- 
 tribute existence to God, although there might not be 
 any God which existed. So far from this being so, it 
 is just here under the appearance of this objection 
 that a sophism lies hid ; for from the fact that I 
 cannot conceive a mountain without a valley, it does 
 not follow that there exists in the world any mountain 
 or any valley, but solely that the mountain and the 
 valley, whether they exist or not, are inseparable from 
 one another ; whereas, from the fact alone that I can- 
 not conceive God except as existent, it follows that 
 existence is inseparable from him, and, consequently, 
 that he exists in reality ; not that my thought can 
 make it to be so, or that it can impose any necessity 
 upon things ; but on the contrary the necessity which 
 is in the thing itself, that is to say, the necessity 
 of the existence of God, determines me to have this 
 thought. 
 
 For it is not at my will to conceive of a God with-
 
 164 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 out existence, that is to say, a being supremely perfect 
 without a supreme perfection, as it is at my will to 
 conceive a horse with wings or without wings. 
 
 And it must not also be said here that it is neces- 
 sarily true that I should affirm that God exists, after 
 I have supposed him to possess all kinds of perfec- 
 tion, since existence is one of these, but that my 
 first supposition is not necessary, no more than it is 
 necessary to affirm that all figures of four sides may 
 be inscribed in the circle, but that, supposing I had 
 this thought, I should be constrained to admit that the 
 rhombus can be inscribed there, since it is a figure of 
 four sides, and thus I should be constrained to admit 
 something false. One ought not, I say, to allege this ; 
 for although it may not be necessary that I should 
 ever fall to thinking about God, nevertheless, when it 
 happens that I think upon a being first and supreme, 
 and draw, so to speak, the idea of him from the store- 
 house of mind, it is necessary that I attribute to him 
 every sort of perfection, although I may not go on to 
 enumerate them all, and give attention to each one in 
 particular. And this necessity is sufficient to bring it 
 about (as soon as I recognize that I should next con- 
 elude that existence is a perfection) that this first and 
 supreme being exists : while, just as it is not necessary 
 that I ever imagine a triangle, but whenever I choose 
 to consider a rectilineal figure, composed solely of 
 three angles, it is absolutely necessary that I attrib- 
 ute to it all the things which serve for the conclusion 
 that these three angles are not greater than two right 
 angles, although, perhaps, I did not then consider this 
 in particular. 
 
 But when I inquire what figures are capable of being 
 inscribed in the circle, it is in no way necessary that I
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 165 
 
 think that all figures of four sides are of this number. 
 On the contrary, I cannot ever fancy this to be the case, 
 in so far as I am willing to receive into my thought 
 only that which I can conceive clearly and distinctly. 
 Consequently there is a great difference between false 
 suppositions, such as this, and the true ideas, which 
 are born with me, of which the first and principal is 
 that of God. For, in truth, I recognize in many ways 
 that this idea is not anything fancied or invented, 
 depending solely on my thought, but it is the image 
 of a veritable and immutable nature ; first, because I 
 cannot conceive any other thing than God alone, to 
 the essence of which existence pertains by necessity, 
 moreover, also, because it is not possible for me to 
 conceive two or more Gods such as he is ; and grant- 
 ing that there is one such who now exists, I see clearly 
 that it is necessary that he should have existed from 
 all eternity, and that he will exist eternally in the fu- 
 ture, and finally, because I conceive many other things 
 in God wherein I can diminish or change nothing 
 whatever. As for the rest, whatever proof or argu- 
 ment I may employ, it is always necessary to return to 
 this, that it is only the things which I conceive clearly 
 and distinctly that have the force to produce complete 
 conviction. 
 
 And although, among the things which I conceive 
 in this manner, there are indeed some of them clearly 
 known by everybody, and there are others also which 
 are not discovered except by those who consider them 
 more closely, and who investigate them more exactly, 
 nevertheless, after they are once discovered, they are 
 reckoned no less certain than the former. As, for ex- 
 ample, in every right-angled triangle, although it may 
 not at first appear so readily that the square of the
 
 l66 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 base is equal to the squares of the other two sides, as 
 it is plain that this base is opposite the greatest angle, 
 nevertheless, after this is once recognized, one is as 
 much persuaded of the one truth as of the other. 
 And as respects God, surely, if my mind were not 
 hindered by any prejudices, and my thought did not 
 find itself diverted by the continual presence of the 
 images of sensible things, there would be nothing 
 which I should not sooner and more readily know than 
 him. For is there anything of itself more clear and 
 more evident than the thought that there is a God ; 
 that is to say, a being supreme and perfect in the idea 
 of which alone necessary or eternal existence is com- 
 prised, and consequently who exists ? 
 
 And, although, for the right conceiving of this truth, 
 I might have need of great application of mind, never- 
 theless, at present, I not only consider myself as much 
 assured of it as of anything that seems to me most 
 certain, but I observe, in addition, that the certainty 
 of all other things depends so absolutely upon it, that 
 without this knowledge it is impossible to be able ever 
 to know anything perfectly. Because, although I am 
 of such a nature that, immediately on comprehending 
 anything very clearly and very distinctly, I cannot 
 help believing it to be true ; nevertheless, because I 
 am also of such a nature that I cannot keep my mind 
 continually fixed upon the same thing, and because I 
 remember that I have often judged something to be 
 true, yet when I stopped thinking of the reasons which 
 obliged me to judge it to be so, it might happen dur- 
 ing that time that other reasons would present them- 
 selves to me, which would easily make me change my 
 opinion, if I did not know that there was a God ; and 
 thus I should have no true and certain knowledge of
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 167 
 
 anything whatever, but solely vague and wavering 
 opinions. As, for example, when I am considering 
 the nature of the rectilinear triangle, I perceive 
 clearly, since I am somewhat versed in geometry, that 
 its three angles are equal to two right angles ; and it 
 is impossible for me not to believe it, so long as I apply 
 my mind to the demonstration of it ; but as soon as 
 I turn away from it, although I might remember hav- 
 ing clearly comprehended it, nevertheless it might 
 easily happen that I should doubt its truth, if I did 
 not know that there was a God ; for I might persuade 
 myself that I had been so made by nature that I could 
 easily deceive myself even in things that I believed I 
 comprehended with most evidence and certitude ; 
 especially since I recollect that I have often con- 
 sidered many things true and certain, which, for other 
 reasons, I have afterward been led to pronounce 
 absolutely false. 
 
 But after I have recognized the existence of a 
 God, and because I have at the same time recognized 
 the fact that all things depend upon him, and that he 
 is no deceiver, and in consequence of that I have 
 judged that all that I conceive clearly and distinctly 
 cannot fail to be true, although I do not think longer 
 on the reasons on account of which I have held it to 
 be true, provided solely that I recollect having clearly 
 and distinctly understood it, no opposing reason can 
 be brought against me which should make me ever 
 call it in question ; and thus I have a true and certain 
 knowledge of it. And this same knowledge extends 
 also to all the other things which I recollect having 
 formerly demonstrated, as the truths of geometry and 
 others like them ; for what is there which can be 
 objected to oblige me to call them in question ? Will
 
 l68 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 it be that my nature is such that I am very liable to 
 be mistaken ? But I know already that I cannot 
 deceive myself in judgments the reasons for which I 
 clearly perceive. Will it be that I have formerly 
 regarded many things as true and certain which after- 
 ward I have discovered to be false ? But I did not 
 perceive any of those things clearly and distinctly, 
 and, not knowing as yet this rule whereby I assure 
 myself of truth, I was led to believe them for reasons 
 that I have since recognized to be less strong than at 
 that time I imagined them to be. What, then, can be 
 objected further ? Will it be that perhaps I am asleep 
 (as I myself have objected heretofore), or rather that 
 all the thoughts which I now have are no more true 
 than the dreams that we imagine when asleep ? 
 
 But even if I am asleep, all that presents itself to 
 my mind with evidence is absolutely true. And thus 
 I recognize very clearly that the certainty and the 
 truth of all knowledge depend on the knowledge 
 alone of the true God : so that before I knew him I 
 could not perfectly know anything else. And now 
 that I know him, I have the means of acquiring a 
 perfect knowledge of an infinitude of things, not only 
 of those which are in him, but also of those which 
 belong to corporeal nature, in so far as it can be made 
 the object of geometrical demonstrations, which do 
 not consider it in respect to its existence.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 169 
 
 SIXTH MEDITATION. 
 
 Of the existence of material things, and of the real dis- 
 tinction between the soul and the body of man. 
 
 THERE remains to me further only to inquire 
 whether there are any material things ; and surely 
 I know already that they can exist, at least in so far 
 as they are regarded as the object of geometrical 
 demonstrations, seeing that in this way I conceive 
 them very clearly and very distinctly. For there is 
 no doubt but that God has the power to produce 
 everything that I am capable of conceiving with dis- 
 tinctness ; and I never held that it was impossible for 
 him to do anything except on the ground alone that 
 I discovered contradiction in the conception of it. 
 Moreover, the faculty of imagination which exists 
 within me, and of which I see by experience that I 
 make use whenever I apply myself to the considera- 
 tion of material things, is capable of persuading me of 
 their existence ; for when I consider attentively the 
 nature of imagination, I find that it is nothing else 
 than a certain application of the faculty of knowledge 
 to a body which is immediately present to it, and 
 which therefore exists. And to make this very evi- 
 dent I observe, first, the difference between imagina- 
 tion and pure intellection or conception. For in- 
 stance, when I imagine a triangle, not only do I 
 conceive that it is a figure composed of three lines, 
 but along with that I imagine these three lines as 
 present, by the force and internal application of my
 
 170 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 mind ; and it is precisely this which I call imagining. 
 Whereas, if I desire to think of a chiliagon, I conceive 
 indeed that it is a figure composed of a thousand 
 sides as easily as I conceive that a triangle is a figure 
 composed of three sides only ; but I cannot imagine 
 the thousand sides of a chiliagon as I do the three 
 sides of a triangle, nor, so to speak, do I see them 
 present with the eyes of my mind. 
 
 And although, in consequence of the habit I have 
 of always using my imagination when I think of cor- 
 poreal things, it happens that on conceiving a chiliagon 
 I represent confusedly to myself some figure, never- 
 theless it is very evident that this figure is not a 
 chiliagon, since it does not differ at all from that 
 which I should represent to myself if I were thinking 
 of a myriagon or of any other figure having a great 
 many sides ; and it would not serve in any way in 
 the discovery of the properties which distinguish the 
 chiliagon from other polygons. Whereas, if the sub- 
 ject of consideration is a pentagon, it is very true that 
 I can conceive its figure, as indeed that of a chilia- 
 gon, without the aid of the imagination ; but I can 
 also imagine it, by giving my mind's attention to each 
 of its five sides, and to the whole of them together, in 
 respect to air or the space which they inclose. 
 
 Thus I see clearly that I require a particular effort 
 of mind for imagining anything of which I do not 
 make use for conceiving or understanding ; and this 
 particular mental effort shows clearly the difference 
 between imagination and intellection or pure concep- 
 tion.* I observe, moreover, that this power of imagin- 
 ing which is within me, in so far as it differs from the 
 
 * Cf. Leibnitz, De Cognitione, Veritate et Ideis, Opera Philo- 
 sophica, p. 79, Erdmann, 1840.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 171 
 
 power of conceiving, is in no way necessary to my 
 nature or to my essence, that is to say, to the essence 
 of my mind ; for, even if I did not have it, there is no 
 doubt I should remain always the same that I am 
 now ; whence, apparently, we may conclude that it 
 depends on something which is different from my 
 mind. And I easily conceive that if somebody exists, 
 to which my mind is so joined and united that it may 
 apply itself to the consideration of it whenever it may 
 please, it may be by this means that it imagines cor- 
 poreal things ; so that this mode of thought differs 
 from pure intellection solely in this : that the mind, in 
 conceiving, turns itself in a manner toward itself and 
 considers some one of the ideas which it has in itself ; 
 but, in imagining, it turns itself toward the body and 
 considers in it something conformed to the idea which 
 it has formed itself, or which it has received through 
 the senses. I easily conceive, I say, that imagination 
 may do something of this sort, if it be true that there 
 are bodies ; and because I cannot find any other way 
 of explaining how it happens, I conjecture from this 
 that probably they exist ; but only probably ; and 
 although I carefully investigate everything, I never- 
 theless do not find, from this distinct idea of corporeal 
 nature which I have in my imagination, that I can 
 draw any argument which necessitates the conclusion 
 that a body exists. 
 
 But I have been wont to imagine many other things 
 besides this corporeal nature which is the object of 
 geometry, to wit, colors, sounds, flavors, pain, and 
 other things similar, although less distinctly ; and, 
 inasmuch as I perceive these things much better by 
 the senses, through the medium of which and of the 
 memory they seem to be brought before my imagina-
 
 172 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 tion, I think that, in order to examine them more 
 conveniently, it is fitting that I inquire at the same 
 time what it is to feel ; and that I see whether from 
 these ideas that I receive into my mind by this mode 
 of thought which I call feeling, I cannot draw some 
 certain proof of the existence of corporeal things. 
 And, in the first place, I shall call up to mind what 
 things I have hitherto held to be true, as having 
 received them through the senses, and upon what 
 foundations my belief rested ; afterward I shall 
 examine the reasons which have since obliged me to 
 call them in question ; and, finally, I shall consider 
 what I ought at present to believe. 
 
 First, then, I felt that I had a head, hands, feet, and 
 all the other members of which this body is composed, 
 which I considered as a part of myself or perhaps 
 even as the whole ; moreover, I felt that this body 
 was placed among many others, from which it was 
 capable of receiving various impressions, favorable 
 and unfavorable, and I took notice of the favorable 
 through a certain feeling of pleasure or delight, and 
 of those unfavorable through a feeling of pain. And 
 besides this pleasure and this pain, I had the sensa- 
 tions within me also of hunger, thirst, and other 
 similar appetites ; as also of certain bodily inclina- 
 tions toward joy and sadness, anger and other like 
 passions. And externally, besides extension, figures, 
 movements of bodies, I observed in them hardness, 
 warmth, and all the other qualities which fall under 
 touch ; moreover, I observed light, colors, odors, 
 tastes, and sounds, the variety of which afforded me 
 means of distinguishing the sky, the earth, the sea, 
 and, in general, all other bodies one from another. 
 And surely, considering the ideas of all these qualities
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 173 
 
 which presented themselves to my thought, and which 
 alone I properly and immediately felt, it was not with- 
 out reason that I believed that I felt things entirely 
 different from my thought, to wit, bodies, whence 
 proceeded these ideas ; for I discovered that they 
 presented themselves to it without requiring my con- 
 sent thereto, so that I could not perceive any object, 
 however I might desire it, if it did not happen to be 
 present to the organ of some one of my senses ; and 
 it was not in my power not to perceive it whenever it 
 should be present there. 
 
 And because the ideas that I received by the senses 
 were much more lively, more vivid, and even in their 
 way more distinct, than any of those which I could 
 fashion of myself in meditation, or even than I found 
 impressed upon my memory, it seemed that they 
 could not proceed from my mind ; so that it was 
 necessary that they should be caused in me by ex- 
 ternal things. Of which things since I had no knowl- 
 edge, except this, that they gave me these ideas, noth- 
 ing else could occur to me but that these external 
 things were like the ideas which they caused. And 
 because I reminded myself also that I more frequently 
 used my senses than my reason, and I took notice 
 that the ideas which I formed of myself were not so 
 vivid as those which I received through the senses, 
 and also that they were oftener made up of parts than 
 the latter were, I easily persuaded myself that I had 
 no idea in my mind which had not first passed through 
 my senses. It was not without reason, also, that I 
 believed that this body, which by a certain peculiar 
 right I called my own, belonged to me more properly 
 and more strictly than any other ; for, in reality, I 
 could never be separated from it as from other bodies;
 
 174 THE PHILOSOPHY ov DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 I experienced in it and on account of it all my appe- 
 tites and all my passions ; and, finally, I was affected 
 with feelings of pleasure and of pain in its members, 
 and not in those of other bodies which were separate 
 from it. But when I inquired why, from this indefinite 
 feeling of pain sadness arose in the mind, and from 
 the feeling of pleasure joy sprang up, or, if you please, 
 why this vague feeling of the stomach, which I call 
 hunger, should cause us to desire to eat, and the dry- 
 ness of the throat should cause us to desire to drink, 
 and so of the rest, I could assign no reason for it 
 except that nature had so taught me ; for there is, 
 surely, no affinity nor relationship, at least none that I 
 could comprehend, between this feeling of the stomach 
 and the desire to eat, no more than between the feeling 
 of the thing which causes pain and the thought of 
 sadness to which this feeling gives birth. 
 
 And in the same way it seemed to me that I had 
 learned from nature all the other things that I judged 
 to be true concerning the objects of my senses ; be- 
 cause I observed that the judgments that I was accus- 
 tomed to make of these objects formed themselves in 
 me before I had time to deliberate and consider any 
 reasons which should oblige me to make them. 
 
 But afterward many experiences destroyed, little by 
 little, all the confidence I had reposed in my senses ; 
 for I observed many times that towers, which from a 
 distance seemed to me to be round, near at hand ap- 
 peared to me to be square, and that colossal figures 
 raised upon the very high summits of these towers 
 appeared to me to be small statues when looked at 
 from below ; and so, in a multitude of other experi- 
 ences, I have discovered error in judgments based 
 upon the external senses ; and not only upon the
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 175 
 
 external senses, but even upon the internal ; for is 
 there anything more personal or more internal than 
 pain ? and, nevertheless, I have sometimes heard of 
 persons who had their arms and legs cut off, that it 
 still seemed to them sometimes that they felt pain in 
 the part which no longer belonged to them ; which 
 circumstance has given me ground to think that I my- 
 self could not be quite sure that anything was the 
 matter with any of my members even if I did feel pain 
 in it. 
 
 And to these reasons for doubt I further added, 
 not long since, two others quite general ; the first is 
 that I never believed myself to perceive anything when 
 awake that I could not also believe I perceived when 
 asleep ; and as I did not believe that the things that 
 I thought I perceived when asleep proceeded from 
 any objects outside of me, I did not see why I ought 
 any more to have this confidence in respect to those 
 which I thought I perceived when awake ; and the 
 second, that not knowing yet, or rather feigning that 
 I did not know, the author of my being, I did not see 
 anything to hinder that I might not have been so made 
 by nature that I might deceive myself even in things 
 which appeared to me the most certain. 
 
 And as for the arguments which hitherto persuaded 
 me of the truth of sensible things, I had no great dif- 
 ficulty in answering them ; for nature appearing to 
 carry me toward many things from which reason 
 turned me aside, I did not believe I ought to trust 
 very much to the teachings of this nature. 
 
 And although the ideas which I received by the 
 senses did not depend upon my will, I did not con- 
 clude on that account that they proceeded from things 
 different from myself, since, perhaps, there might be
 
 176 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 found in me some faculty, although it might be up to 
 the present unknown to me, which was the cause of 
 them, and which produced them. But now that I am 
 beginning to understand myself better, and to dis- 
 cover more clearly the source of my being, I do not 
 think in truth that I ought rashly to admit all the 
 things which the senses appear to teach me, but I do 
 not think also that I ought to call them universally in 
 question. 
 
 And in the first place, because I know that all 
 things which I conceive clearly and distinctly may be 
 produced by God such as I conceive them, it is suf- 
 ficient that I can conceive clearly and distinctly one 
 thing without another, to make it certain that the one 
 is distinct or different from the other, because they 
 might be separated at least by the almighty power of 
 God ; and it makes no difference by what power this 
 separation is effected, to make the judgment neces- 
 sary that they are different ; and because, from the 
 fact itself that I know with certainty that I'exist, and, 
 nevertheless, I do not observe that there necessarily 
 belongs to my nature or to my essence anything else, 
 but that I am a thing which thinks, I very properly con- 
 clude that my essence consists in this alone that I am a 
 thing which thinks, or a substance the whole essence or 
 nature of which is only to think. And although, per- 
 haps, or rather, certainly, as I shall show directly, I 
 may have a body to which I am very closely united ; 
 nevertheless, because I have, on the one side, a clear 
 and distinct idea of myself, in so far as I am solely a 
 thing which thinks, and is not extended, and on the 
 other I have a distinct idea of body, in so far as it 
 is solely a thing extended, and which does not think, 
 it is certain that I, that is to say, my soul, by which I
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 177 
 
 am what I am, is entirely and truly distinct from my 
 body, and that it may be, or exist, without it.* 
 
 Moreover, I find within me divers faculties of 
 thought, each of which has its peculiar mode ; for ex- 
 ample, I find within me the faculties of imagination 
 and perception, without which I can easily conceive 
 myself as a whole clearly and distinctly, but not 
 reciprocally these without myself, that is to say, without 
 an intelligent substance, to which they are attached 
 or to which they belong : because, in the notion which 
 we have of these faculties, or to make use of the 
 scholastic terms in their formal concept, they include 
 some sort of intellection ; whence I conclude that they 
 are distinct from me as modes are from things. I am 
 conscious, also, of certain other faculties, as those of 
 locomotion, of assuming various positions, and others 
 similar, which cannot be conceived, any more than the 
 preceding, without some substance to which they are 
 attached, nor consequently exist without it ; but it is 
 very evident that these faculties, if it be true that they 
 exist, must belong to some corporeal or extended sub- 
 stance, and not to an intelligent substance, since in the 
 clear and distinct concept of them there is indeed 
 found contained some sort of extension, but no intelli- 
 gence whatever. 
 
 Moreover, I cannot doubt that there is within me a 
 certain passive faculty of perception that is to say, of 
 receiving and of recognizing the ideas of sensible 
 things ; but it would be useless to me, and I could not 
 in any way avail myself of it, if there were not also in 
 me, or in some other thing, another active faculty, 
 
 *Cf. Print., i, 51-56 (CEuvres, t. 3, p. 94, Lat. p. 13). below p. 
 194, and Geom. proof, Prop. IV., (Euvrcs, t. 3, p. 464. Veitch, 
 p. 273.
 
 1 78 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 capable of forming and producing these ideas. But 
 this active faculty cannot be in me in so far as I am only 
 a thing which thinks, seeing that it does not presup- 
 pose my thought, and that these ideas are often repre- 
 sented in me without my contributing to it in any 
 manner, and even often against my desire ; it must, 
 therefore, necessarily be in some substance different 
 from me, in which all the reality, which is objectively 
 in the ideas produced by this faculty, is contained form- 
 ally or eminently, as I have already observed ; and 
 this substance is either a body, that is to say, a cor- 
 poreal nature, in which is contained formally and in 
 reality all that is objectively and representatively in 
 the ideas ; or else it is God himself, or some other 
 created thing more noble than the body, in which the 
 body itself is contained eminently. 
 
 But, God being no deceiver, it is very manifest that 
 he did not impart these ideas to me immediately from 
 himself, nor even by the medium of some created ex- 
 istence in which their reality was not contained form- 
 ally, but solely, eminently. For as he has not given 
 me any faculty for knowing what this might be, but, 
 on the contrary, a very strong disposition to believe 
 that they come from corporeal things, I do not see how 
 he could be acquitted of deception if in reality these 
 ideas come from elsewhere, or were produced by any 
 other causes than corporeal things ; and, accordingly, 
 it must be concluded that corporeal things exist.* 
 Nevertheless they are, perhaps, not altogether such as 
 we perceive them by the senses, for there are many 
 things which make this perception of the senses very 
 obscure and confused ; but at least it must be ad- 
 
 * Cf. Ptinc., pt. II, I, (Etivres, t. 3, p. 120. Veitch's Descartes, 
 p. 232.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 179 
 
 milled lhal all Ihings lhal I conceive clearly and dis- 
 linclly lhal is lo say, all Ihings, speaking generally, 
 which are comprised in Ihe field of speculalive 
 geomelry aclually exisl. 
 
 Bui as for olher Ihings, which eilher are merely 
 parlicular [perceplions] for example, lhal Ihe sun is 
 of such a size and of such a figure, elc. ; or which are 
 less clearly and less distinctly conceived, as lighl, 
 sound, pain, and Ihe like, it is certain lhat allhough 
 they are very doubtful and uncertain, nevertheless, 
 from the fact alone that God is no deceiver, and, con- 
 sequently, that he did not permit that there should be 
 any falsity in my opinions which he has not also given 
 me some faculty capable of correcting, I believe I may 
 assuredly conclude that I have within me the means 
 of knowing them with certainly.* 
 
 And in Ihe firsl place, there is no doubt thai all 
 that nature teaches me contains some truth, for by 
 nature, considered in general, I now understand noth- 
 ing else than God himself,f or, rather, the order and 
 disposition which God has established in the creation ; 
 and by my nature in particular I understand nothing 
 else than the constitution or assemblage of all the 
 things which God has given me. But there is nothing 
 which this nature leaches me more distinctly or more 
 sensibly than lhal I have a body which is out of order 
 when I feel pain, which has need of food or drink 
 when I have the sensations of hunger, or thirst, etc. 
 And Iherefore I cannot doubt thai Ihere is in Ihissome 
 irulh. 
 
 * Cf. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Dialectic, 
 Book ii, ch. ii, 4, Professor Watson's Selections, p. 166. 
 
 f Deus sive natura Spinoza. Notice, however, this corrected 
 statement.
 
 l8o THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 Nature teaches me also by these sensations of pain, 
 hunger, thirst, that I am not merely lodged in my 
 body as a pilot in his ship, but, besides, that I am very 
 closely conjoined with it, and so mixed and mingled 
 with it that I compose, as it were, one whole with it. 
 For if it were not so, whenever my body is hurt, I 
 should not on that account feel any pain I who am 
 only a thing which thinks but I should perceive this 
 injury by the understanding alone, as a pilot perceives 
 by sight if anything is giving way in his vessel. And 
 when my body needs drink or food, I should be sim- 
 ply aware of this, without being apprised of it by the 
 confused sensations of hunger and thirst ; for in 
 reality all these sensations of hunger, thirst, pain, etc., 
 are nothing but certain confused forms of thought 
 which spring from and are dependent upon the union 
 and, as it were, the blending of the mind with the body. 
 Besides this, nature teaches me that many other bodies 
 exist around my own, some of which I have to seek 
 after and others to avoid. And surely, from the fact 
 that I perceive divers sorts of colors, odors, tastes, 
 sounds, warmth, hardness, etc., I readily conclude 
 that there are in the bodies whence these divers per- 
 ceptions of sense proceed certain changes which cor- 
 respond to them, although perhaps these changes do 
 not in reality resemble them ; and from the fact that, 
 among these divers perceptions of the senses, some 
 of them are agreeable and others disagreeable, there 
 is no doubt that my body, or, rather, my entire self, 
 in so far as I am composed of body and soul, might 
 receive divers benefits or injuries from other bodies 
 which surround me. 
 
 But there are many other things which apparently 
 nature has taught me, which nevertheless I did not
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 181 
 
 really learn from her, but which have introduced 
 themselves into my mind through a certain habit I 
 have of judging of things inconsiderately ; and so it 
 can easily happen that they contain some falsity ; as, 
 for example, the opinion I have that every space, in 
 which there is nothing which moves and makes im- 
 pression upon my senses, is empty ; that in a body 
 which is warm there is anything resembling the idea 
 of warmth which is in me; that in a white or black 
 body there is the same whiteness or blackness which 
 I perceive ; that in a bitter or sweet body there is the 
 same taste, or the same flavor, and so of the rest ; 
 that stars, towers, and other distant bodies are of the 
 same figure and size as they appear from afar to be 
 to our eyes, etc. 
 
 But in order that there may be nothing in this 
 that I do not distinctly conceive, I ought precisely 
 to define what I mean when I say that nature 
 teaches me anything. For I use the term nature 
 here in a more restricted sense than when I called it 
 an assemblage or constitution of all the things which 
 God has given me ; seeing that this assemblage 
 or constitution comprises many things which per- 
 tain to the mind alone, of which I do not here intend 
 to speak while speaking of nature ; as, for example, 
 the notion which I have of this truth, that what 
 has once been done can no longer be as not hav- 
 ing been done, and a multitude of others like it, 
 which I know by the natural light without the aid of 
 the body ; and that it comprises, also, many others 
 which belong to body alone, and are not here con- 
 tained under the term nature as the quality it has 
 of being heavy, and many others similar ; of which, 
 also, I do not speak, but solely of the things which
 
 182 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 God has given me as being composed of mind and 
 body. 
 
 But this nature teaches me, indeed, to avoid the 
 things which cause in me the sensation of pain and 
 carries me toward those which make me have some 
 pleasurable sensation ; but I do not see that beyond 
 this it teaches me that, from these divers perceptions 
 of the senses, we ought ever to conclude anything in 
 respect to the things which are external to us, unless 
 the mind has carefully and maturely considered them ; 
 for, it seems to me, it pertains to the mind alone, and 
 not to the mind as blended with the body, to know 
 the truth of these things. 
 
 Thus, although a star makes no greater impression 
 upon my eye than the flame of a candle, there is, 
 nevertheless, in me no faculty, real or natural, which 
 leads me to believe that it is not greater than this 
 flame, but I have judged it to be so from my earliest 
 years without rational grounds. And although in ap- 
 proaching fire I feel the heat, and also by drawing a 
 little nearer to it I feel pain, there is, nevertheless, no 
 reason which could persuade me that there is anything 
 in the fire resembling this heat, any more than this 
 pain ; but, merely, I have reason to believe that there 
 is something in it, whatever it may be, which excites 
 in me these sensations of heat or pain. Likewise, 
 although there may be spaces in which I do not find 
 anything which excites and stirs my senses, I ought 
 not, on that account, to conclude that these spaces 
 contain no bodies within them ; but I see that in this, 
 as in many other things similar, I have been in the 
 habit of perverting and confounding the order of 
 nature, because these sensations, or perceptions of the 
 senses, having been put in me merely to indicate to
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 183 
 
 my mind what things are beneficial or harmful to the 
 composite whole of which it is a part, and being for 
 that purpose sufficiently clear and distinct, I have 
 nevertheless made use of them as if they were very 
 certain rules, whereby I might immediately know the 
 essence and the nature of bodies outside of me, con- 
 cerning which, notwithstanding, they can teach me 
 nothing except very obscurely and confusedly 
 
 Beginning then this inquiry, I observe in the first 
 place that there is a great difference between the mind 
 and the body, in that the body, from its nature, is 
 always divisible, while the mind is entirely indivisible. 
 For in truth, when I consider it, that is to say, when I 
 consider myself, in so far as I am simply a thing which 
 thinks, I cannot distinguish within me any parts, but 
 I know and conceive very clearly that I am a thing 
 absolutely one and entire. And although the entire 
 mind seems to be united to the entire body, neverthe- 
 less, whenever a foot, or an arm, or any other part has 
 been separated from it, I know very well that nothing 
 for that reason has been cut off from my mind. And 
 the faculties of willing, of feeling, of conceiving, etc., 
 can not properly be called its parts ; for it is the same 
 mind which is active as one whole in willing, and as 
 one whole in feeling and in conceiving, etc. 
 
 But quite the contrary is the case with things cor- 
 poreal or extended, for I cannot imagine any one of 
 them, however small it may be, that I could not easily 
 take to pieces in my thought, or that my mind could 
 not readily divide into many parts, and, consequently, 
 that I should not know to be divisible. This is suffi- 
 cient to teach me that the mind or soul of man is en- 
 tirely different from the body, if I had not already 
 learned this truth well enough from other sources.
 
 184 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 I observe, also, that the mind does not receive im- 
 mediately impressions from all parts of the body, but 
 solely from the brain, or perhaps even from one of its 
 smallest parts, to wit, from that where it exercises this 
 faculty which it calls the common sense, which, when- 
 ever it is disposed in the same way, causes the mind to 
 perceive the same thing, although, nevertheless, the 
 other parts of the body may be differently disposed, 
 as testify a multitude of experiences which there is 
 no need here to recount. 
 
 I observe, further, that the nature of the body is 
 such that no one of its parts can be moved by another 
 part a little remote from it, except as it might be 
 moved, in the same way, by each of the parts which 
 are between the two, although the most distant part 
 did not act. As for example, in the cord A B C D, 
 which is completely tense, if one should draw and 
 move the last part, D, the first, A, will not be moved 
 any otherwise than it would be if one of the middle 
 parts, B or C, were drawn, while the last, D, remained 
 unmoved. 
 
 In the same way, when I feel pain in the foot 
 physics teaches me that this sensation communicates 
 itself by means of the nerves spread through the foot, 
 which, being stretched like cords from that point up 
 to the brain, whenever they are excited in the foot, 
 excite also at the same time that part of the brain from 
 whence they come and at which they terminate, and 
 cause there a certain motion which nature has insti- 
 tuted for the purpose* of making the pain to be felt 
 by the mind, as if this pain were in the foot ; but be- 
 cause these nerves must pass through the shank, the 
 
 * Note the admission of final cause, which Descartes excludes 
 from his philosophy. See above, p. 149 n.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 185 
 
 thigh, the loins, the back, and the neck, in order to 
 reach from the foot to the brain, it may happen that 
 although their extremities in the foot may not be 
 moved, but merely some of their parts which pass 
 through the loins or the neck, that nevertheless excites 
 the same motions in the brain which would be excited 
 there by a wound received in the foot ; in consequence 
 of which the mind will necessarily feel a pain in the 
 foot just as it would had there been an injury there ; 
 and we must judge the same to be true of all the 
 other perceptions of our senses. 
 
 Finally I observe thatsince each one of the motions 
 which are made in that part of the brain where the 
 mind immediately receives the impression can make 
 it sensible of but a single sensation, nothing better can 
 be desired or imagined than that this motion should 
 cause the mind to feel, among all the sensations which 
 it is capable of causing, that one which is the most 
 suitable and the most commonly useful to the preser- 
 vation of the human body when it is in full health. 
 But experience teaches us that all the sensations 
 which nature has bestowed upon us are such as I have 
 just described, and accordingly there is nothing to be 
 found in them which would not make manifest the 
 power and the goodness of God. Thus, for example, 
 when the nerves which are in the foot are violently 
 and extraordinarily disturbed, their motion, passing 
 through the spinal marrow to the brain, makes there 
 an impression on the mind which causes it to feel 
 something ; to wit, a pain as being in the foot, whereby 
 the mind is warned and aroused to do its utmost to 
 drive away the cause of it, as being very dangerous 
 and injurious to the foot. It is true that God might 
 have so constituted the nature of man that this same
 
 l86 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 motion in the brain might have caused something 
 quite different to be felt by the mind ; for example, 
 that it should have caused it to feel itself, either in so 
 far as it is in the brain, or as it is in the foot, or, in- 
 deed, as it is in any place between the foot and the 
 brain, or, finally, something else, whatever it might be, 
 but nothing of all that could so well have contributed 
 to the preservation of the body as that which it does 
 cause it to feel. 
 
 Likewise, when we need to drink, there arises there- 
 from a certain dryness in the throat which sets its 
 nerves in motion, and by means of them the interior 
 parts of the brain ; and this motion causes the sensa- 
 tion of thirst to be felt in the mind, because, under 
 those circumstances, there is nothing which can be 
 more useful for us to know than that for the preser- 
 vation of our health we need to drink ; and so of the 
 rest. 
 
 Whence it is quite plain that, notwithstanding the 
 sovereign goodness of God, the nature of man, in so 
 far as it is composed of mind and body, cannot but be 
 sometimes misleading and deceptive. For if there is 
 any cause which excites not in the foot, but in some 
 part of the nerve which extends from the foot to the 
 brain, or even within the brain, the same motion which 
 it ordinarily causes when something is the matter with 
 the foot, pain will be felt as if it were in the foot, and 
 the sense will naturally be deceived ; because the same 
 motion in the brain being able to cause only the same 
 sensation in the mind, and this sensation being 
 oftener excited by a cause which injures the foot than 
 by another which may be felt elsewhere, it is much 
 more reasonable that it carry to the mind pain of the 
 foot than that of any other part.
 
 METAPHYSICS] MEDITATIONS. 187 
 
 And if it happen that sometimes dryness of the 
 throat does not proceed, as ordinarily, from the fact 
 that drink is needed for the health of the body, but 
 from some cause quite opposite, as happens to those 
 who are dropsical, nevertheless it is much better that 
 it deceive in this condition, than it would be if it 
 should deceive always when the body is in health; and 
 so of the rest. And certainly this consideration is of 
 great service to me, not only for recognizing all the 
 errors to which my nature is subject, but, also, for the 
 more easy avoidance or correction of them, because, 
 knowing that all my senses indicate more commonly 
 what is true than what is false in respect to the things 
 which are favorable or unfavorable to the body, and 
 being almost always able to make use of several of 
 them to examine the same thing, and besides that, be- 
 ing able to use my memory to connect present knowl- 
 edge with past, and my understanding, which has al- 
 ready discovered all the causes of my errors, I ought 
 not henceforward to fear to meet with falsity in the 
 things which are most commonly presented by my 
 senses. 
 
 And all the doubts of these past days I ought to 
 reject as absurd and ridiculous, and particularly that 
 uncertainty in general about sleep, and my not being 
 able to distinguish the state of being awake ; for now 
 I find a most notable difference, in that our memory 
 can never bind and join together our dreams one with 
 another, and with the whole course of our life, as it is 
 accustomed to join together the things which happen 
 to us while we are awake. And, in truth, if anyone, 
 when I am awake, should appear all of a sudden and 
 disappear in the same way as do the phantoms which 
 I see when I am asleep, so that I could not tell whence
 
 l88 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 he came or whither he went, it would not be without 
 reason if I thought him a specter or a phantom fash- 
 ioned within my brain, and like those which are formed 
 there when I am asleep, rather than a real man. 
 
 But when I perceive things of which I know dis- 
 tinctly both the place whence they come and where 
 they are, and the time at which they appear to me, 
 and am able, without any break, to connect the per- 
 ception which I have of them with the remaining 
 course of my life, I am perfectly certain that I per- 
 ceive them being awake, and not in my sleep, and I 
 ought not in any manner to doubt the truth of these 
 things if, after I have summoned all my senses, my 
 memory, and my understanding, to the examination 
 of them, there is nothing reported to me by any of 
 them which disagrees with what is reported to me by 
 the rest. Because, from the fact that God is no de- 
 ceiver, it follows necessarily that I am not deceived in 
 this. But because exigency of circumstances often 
 obliges us to decide before we have had the leisure to 
 examine so carefully, it must be admitted that human 
 life is liable to very frequent mistakes in particular 
 instances ; and, in fine, the infirmity and weakness of 
 our nature must be confessed.
 
 SELECTIONS 
 
 FROM THE PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSO- 
 PHY, TRANSLATED FROM THE 
 LATIN : OPERA PHILOSOPHICA, 
 EDITIO ULTIMA, AMSTELO- 
 DAMI, APUD DANIE- 
 LEM ELZEVIRIUM, 
 MDCLXXVII.
 
 PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSOPHY. 
 
 PART FIRST.* 
 
 .... THERE are very many persons who never in 
 their whole life perceive anything so correctly as to 
 warrant a certain judgment upon it. For, in order that 
 a certain and incontestable judgment may be based 
 upon the perception of anything, it is requisite that 
 the perception be not only clear but distinct. I call 
 a perception clear which is present and manifest 
 to an attentive mind ; just as we say that those 
 things are clearly seen by us, which, being present 
 to the gazing eye, affect it with sufficient strength 
 and plainness. But I call a perception distinct which, 
 while it is clear, is also so separated and distinguished 
 from all others that it plainly contains nothing but 
 what is clear. 
 
 Thus, when anyone feels any great pain, this per- 
 ception of pain is, indeed, most clear to him, but it is 
 not always distinct, for men usually confound it with 
 an obscure judgment of their own concerning the 
 nature of something in the part affected which they 
 think to be similar to the feeling of the pain which 
 alone they clearly perceive. And thus a perception 
 may be clear which is not distinct, but no perception 
 can be distinct which is not clear. 
 
 But, indeed, in our earliest years the mind was so 
 
 * 45-7- Translated from the Latin : Opera Philosoph- 
 ica, editio ultima, Amstelodami, Apud Danielem Elzevirium, 
 MDCLXXVII.
 
 IQ2 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 immersed in the body that although it perceived many 
 things clearly it did not perceive anything distinctly ; 
 and as, nevertheless, it formed its judgments con- 
 cerning many things, we imbibed many prejudices 
 which, in the case of many persons, never afterward 
 have been laid aside. In order that we may be able 
 to free ourselves from these, I will make a complete 
 enumeration of all the simple notions of which our 
 thoughts are composed, and will distinguish what in 
 each is clear and what is obscure, or in what we may 
 err. 
 
 Whatever falls under our perceptions we consider 
 as being either things or certain affections of things, 
 or as being eternal truths having no existence beyond 
 our thought. Among those which we consider as 
 things, the most general notions of them are substance, 
 duration, order, number, and any others of this sort 
 which relate to all classes of things. But I recognize 
 only two highest classes \sumtna genera] of things ; 
 one is of things intellectual, or having the power of 
 thought, that is, pertaining to mind or the thinking 
 substance ; the other of material things, or which 
 pertain to extended substance, that is, to body. Per- 
 ception, volition, and all modes both of perceiving 
 and of willing, are referred to thinking substance ; 
 but to extended substances [are referred] magnitude 
 or extension in length, breadth, and depth figure, 
 motion, position, divisibility of parts, and such like. 
 But there are certain other modes also, which we ex- 
 perience in ourselves, which are to be referred neither 
 to the mind alone, nor yet to the body alone, but arise 
 from the close and intimate union of our mind with the 
 body, namely the appetites of hunger, thirst, etc., 
 likewise emotions, or passions of the mind, which
 
 METAPHYSICS] PRINCIPLES. 193 
 
 consist not in thought alone, as the emotions of 
 anger, joy, sadness, love, etc., and finally, all sensa- 
 tions, as of pain, pleasure, of light and colors, sounds, 
 odors, tastes, heat, hardness, and other tangible 
 qualities. 
 
 And all these we consider as things or qualities or 
 modes of things. But when we recognize anything as 
 being impossible, as that something should arise from 
 nothing, then this proposition, Ex nihilo nihil fit, is 
 considered not as an existing thing, nor yet as a mode 
 of a thing, but as a certain eternal truth which has its 
 seat in our mind, and is called a common notion, or 
 axiom.* Of this sort are : It is impossible that the 
 same thing should at once be and not be ; Whatever 
 has been done cannot be not done ; He who thinks 
 cannot be non-existent while he thinks ; and innumer- 
 able others which, indeed, cannot all be easily enumer- 
 ated, but neither can they be ignored, whenever the 
 occasion arises that we think of them, and are blinded 
 by no prejudices. 
 
 And, indeed, as respects these common notions, there 
 is no doubt but that they can be clearly and distinctly 
 perceived, for otherwise they could not be called com- 
 mon notions ; although it is true that certain of them 
 do not merit that title in regard to all men, because 
 they are not equally perceived by all. Not, however, 
 as I think, because the knowing faculty of one man 
 has wider range than that of another ; but because 
 these common notions happen to be opposed to the 
 pre-formed opinions of some men who, for that reason, 
 cannot easily grasp them ; while others, who are 
 
 * For a list of such axioms (10 in all) see Geom. proof, Axioms 
 or Common Notions, in Reply to 2d Obj., (Euvres, t. i, pp. 458- 
 460 ; Veitch's Descartes, p. 270.
 
 19$ THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 free from these prejudices, perceive them most 
 plainly.* 
 
 In respect to what we regard either as things or as 
 modes of things, it is worth while to consider each in 
 succession. By substance we^an understand nothing 
 else than a thing which so exists that it needs no 
 other t h i ng in^o r d e r to exist. And, indeed, the suB- 
 stance which evidently needs no other thing can be 
 thought of as being one^only, namely, God.f But all 
 others we perceive can exist only by the help of the 
 concourse of God.J And therefore the name, sub- 
 stance, cannot belong to God and to them univocally, 
 as they say in the schools, that is, no signification of 
 this name can be distinctly understood as common 
 to God and to creatures. 
 
 But corporeal substance and mind, or thinking 
 substance, as created, can be comprehended under 
 this common conception, because they are things 
 which require only the concourse of God for their 
 existence. Nevertheless, substance cannot be first 
 known by this alone that a thing exists ; because 
 this by itself alone does not affect us ; but we easily 
 recognize it by any one of its attributes, through 
 that common notion that nothing can have no attri- 
 butes or properties or qualities. For from this, that 
 we perceive some attribute to be present, we conclude 
 some existing thing, or substance, to which that can 
 be attributed, to be necessarily present also. 
 
 And indeed, from any attribute whatever, a sub- 
 stance can be recognized ; but, nevertheless, there is of 
 
 * Cf. Hobbes' objection and Descartes' reply (Med. iv, 302), Obj. 
 et Rep., (Euvres, i, p. 496. See above, p. 154 n. 
 f Ueus est substantia una et unica Spinoza. 
 | Occasionalism Geulincx.
 
 METAPHYSICS] PRINCIPLES. 195 
 
 any substance one principal property, which consti- 
 tutes its nature and essence, and to which all the rest 
 are related ; namely, extension in length, breadth, and 
 depth constitutes the nature of corporeal substance ; 
 and thought constitutes^ tHe nature of thinking sub^ 
 "stance. For everything else which can be attributed 
 to body presupposes extension, and is only a certain 
 mode of an extended thing ; as, also, all that we can 
 discover in mind are only divers modes of thinking. 
 Thus, for example, figure cannot be understood except 
 in an extended thing, nor motion except in a space 
 extended ; nor imagination, nor sense, nor will, except 
 in a thinking thing. But, on the other hand, exten- 
 sion can be understood without figure or motion, and 
 thought without imagination, or sense, and so of the 
 rest ; as is plain to anyone who reflects upon it. 
 And thus we can easily have two clear and distinct 
 notions or ideas, one of created thinking substance, 
 the other of corporeal substance ; if, namely, we dis- 
 tinguish accurately all attributes of thought from 
 attributes of extension. So, also, we can have a clear 
 and distinct idea of a thinking substance uncreated 
 and independent, that is, of God ; only we must not 
 suppose that it adequately represents all that is in 
 God, nor must we introduce anything fictitious, but 
 simply attend to what in truth is contained in it, and 
 what we plainly perceive to belong to the nature of a 
 being supremely perfect. And surely no one can 
 deny that such an idea of God exists within us, unless 
 he thinks that there is no knowledge of God whatever 
 in human minds. 
 
 Duration, order, and number are also most dis- 
 tinctly known by us, provided we assign to them no 
 conception of substance, but think the duration of
 
 ig6 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 anything to be merely a mode under which we con- 
 ceive this thing, in so far as it continues to exist. 
 And in a similar way we are to conceive of order and 
 number as not being anything distinct from things 
 ordered and numbered, but as being merely modes 
 under which we consider them. 
 
 And, indeed, here we are to understand by modes 
 what elsewhere we mean by attributes or qualities. 
 But when we consider substance to be affected or 
 changed by them, we call them modes ; and again, 
 when we consider them more generally, as simply 
 existing in substance, we call them attributes. There- 
 fore we say that, properly speaking, there are in God 
 no modes or qualities, but attributes only, because 
 no variation is known in him.* And also, in cre- 
 ated things, those characters which are not subject 
 to change, such as existence and duration, in a thing 
 existing and enduring, should not be called qualities 
 or modes, but attributes. 
 
 But some of these are in things themselves, of which 
 they are said to be attributes or modes ; others in our 
 thought only. Thus, when we distinguish time from 
 duration taken generally, and say that it is the num- 
 ber of motion, it is merely a mode of our thought ; 
 nor do we know, Indeed, any other duration in mo- 
 tion than in things not moved ; as is evident from 
 this, that, if two bodies are moved, one slowly, the 
 other swiftly, for an hour, we count no more time in 
 one than in the other, although there is much more 
 motion. But in order to measure the duration of all 
 things, we compare it with the duration of those 
 greatest and in the highest degree equable motions 
 by which the years and days arise ; and this duration 
 * Cf. Spinoza's views of attribute and mode. See above, p. 29
 
 METAPHYSICS] PRINCIPLES. 197 
 
 we call time, which, accordingly, is nothing super- 
 added to duration taken generally, but a mode of 
 thought.* 
 
 So also number, when considered not in any created 
 things, but only in the abstract or in kind, is a mode 
 of thought only ; so are all other notions which we 
 call universals. 
 
 These universals arise from this, merely, that we 
 use one and the same idea in thinking of all the indi- 
 viduals which are similar among themselves ; as also 
 we impose one and the same name upon all the things 
 represented by this idea, which name is a universal. 
 Thus, when we see two stones, and do not attend to 
 their nature, but to this only that they are two, we 
 form an idea of that number which we call the binary ; 
 and when afterward we see two birds or two trees, 
 and do not consider their nature, but only that they 
 are two, we repeat the same idea as before, which, 
 accordingly, is a universal, and we call this number by 
 the same universal name, binary. In the same man- 
 ner, when we consider a figure bounded by three 
 lines, we form a certain idea of it, which we call tri- 
 angle ; and we use this afterward as a universal to 
 represent to our mind all other figures bounded by 
 three lines. And when we observe among triangles 
 that some have one right angle and others have not, 
 we form a universal idea of right-angled triangles, 
 which, being related to the preceding as more general, 
 is called a species; and this character of being right- 
 angled is the universal difference by which all right- 
 angled triangles are distinguished from others ; and 
 that in these the square of the base is equal to the 
 square of the sides is a property belonging to all of 
 * See above, p. 34.
 
 198 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 them, and to them only ; and finally, if we suppose 
 some triangles of this sort to be in motion, and others 
 not to be moved, this will be in them a universal acci- 
 dent. And in this way there are commonly reckoned 
 five universals, genus, species, difference, property, 
 and accident. 
 
 But number arises in things themselves from distinc- 
 tion in regard to them, which distinction is threefold : 
 real, modal, and logical. The real properly exists only 
 between two or more substances, and these we perceive 
 to be really mutually distinct in themselves by this 
 alone, that we are able to know one from the other 
 clearly and distinctly. For, knowing God, we are cer- 
 tain that he can bring to pass whatever we distinctly 
 know, so that, for example, from this alone, that we 
 have the idea of extended or corporeal substance, al- 
 though we do not yet certainly know that any such 
 substance really exists, nevertheless we are certain 
 that it can exist, and, if it exist, every part of it dis- 
 tinguished by us in thought is in reality distinct from 
 the other parts of the same substance. Likewise, 
 from this alone, that each one of us knows himself 
 to be a thinking thing, and is able in thought to 
 exclude from himself every other substance, both 
 thinking and extended, it is certain that everyone, 
 so regarded, is really distinct from every other think- 
 ing substance, and from every corporeal substance. 
 And even if we suppose that God has joined in the 
 closest manner possible to such a thinking substance 
 a certain corporeal substance, and so from these two 
 has produced one, they nevertheless remain really 
 distinct ; because, however closely he may have united 
 them, he cannot dispossess himself of the power which 
 he had before of separating them, or of preserving
 
 METAPHYSICS] PRINCIPLES. 199 
 
 one without the other ; and whatever substances either 
 can be separated by God, or preserved independently, 
 are really distinct. 
 
 Modal distinction is twofold ; the one between mode 
 properly so called, and the substance of which it is 
 the mode ; the other between two modes of the same 
 substance. The former is known by this, that we can 
 clearly perceive a substance indeed without a mode, 
 which we say is distinct from it, but we cannot, vice 
 versa, comprehend that mode without the substance. 
 So figure and motion are distinguished modalty from 
 corporeal substance, to which they belong ; so also 
 an affirmation and a recollection, from the mind. But 
 the latter is known from this, that we can indeed 
 apprehend one motion apart from another, and vice 
 versa, but neither apart from the substance to which 
 they belong ; as, if a stone be moved, and be square, 
 I can, indeed, apprehend its square figure without its 
 motion ; and, vice versa, its motion without its square 
 figure ; but neither that motion nor that square fig- 
 ure can I apprehend without the substance of the 
 stone. But the distinction whereby the mode of one 
 substance differs from another substance, or from a 
 mode of another substance, as the motion of one body 
 from another body, or from the mind, and motion from 
 doubt, would seem to be properly called real rather 
 than modal, because those modes are not clearly 
 known apart from substances really distinct, of which 
 they are modes. 
 
 Finally, distinction of reason exists between sub- 
 stance and any attribute of it without which the sub- 
 stance itself cannot be known ; on between two such 
 attributes of the same substance. And it is recog- 
 nized by this, that we cannot form a clear and
 
 20O THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 distinct idea of the substance itself if we exclude 
 from it that attribute ; or that we cannot clearly appre- 
 hend the idea of one of its attributes if we separate 
 that one from another. Inasmuch as any substance 
 whatever, if it cease to endure, ceases also to 
 exist, it is distinguished from its own duration by 
 intellect only. And all modes of thinking, which we 
 regard as if they were in objects, differ only for the 
 intellect, now from the objects concerning which they 
 are thought, and now from one another in one and the 
 same object. I remember, indeed, that I have else- 
 where conjoined this sort of distinction with the 
 modal ; namely, at the end of the Reply to the First 
 Objections in the Meditations on the First Philos- 
 ophy ; but in that case there was no occasion for ac- 
 curate distinction of them, and it was sufficient to my 
 purpose to distinguish both from the real. 
 
 Thought and extension may be regarded as consti- 
 tuting the nature of substance, intelligent and cor- 
 poreal ; and accordingly they should not be otherwise 
 conceived than as the thinking substance itself and 
 the corporeal substance, that is, as mind and body ; 
 thus we know them most clearly and most distinctly. 
 Moreover, we know extended substance or thinking 
 substance more easily than substance alone, abstract- 
 ing the quality that it thinks or is extended. For 
 there is some difficulty in abstracting the notion of 
 substance from the notions of thought and ex- 
 tension, which, indeed, are diverse from it only by 
 this very reason ; * and a conception does not become 
 more distinct, because we comprehend in it fewer 
 things, but only because the things which we do com- 
 
 * Namely, that we thus mentally abstract them from substance ; 
 in reality they are inseparable from substance.
 
 METAPHYSICS] PRINCIPLES. 201 
 
 prehend in it we distinguish accurately from all the 
 rest. 
 
 Thought and extension may be taken as modes of 
 substance in so far, indeed, as one and the same 
 mind may have many different thoughts ; and one 
 and the same body, while retaining the same magni- 
 tude, may be extended in many different modes ; now 
 more in length, and less in breadth or depth, and 
 again, on the contrary, more in breadth and less in 
 length. And then they are distinguished modally 
 from substance, and may be known not less clearly 
 and distinctly than [substance] itself ; only they are 
 not to be regarded as substances, or things separate 
 from others, but solely as modes of things. For it 
 is by considering them as being in the substances 
 of which they are the modes, that we distinguish 
 them from those substances and know them as they 
 really are. But, on the contrary, if we choose to con- 
 sider them as existing apart from the substances in 
 which they inhere, by this very fact we regard them 
 as things subsistent [by themselves] and thus con- 
 found the ideas of mode and substance. 
 
 In the same way we shall best understand the differ- 
 ent modes of thought, such as intellection, imagination, 
 memory, will, etc., and also the different modes of ex- 
 tension, or, as belonging to extension, all figures, and 
 positions of parts, and motions of these, if only we 
 regard them as modes of the things in which they 
 inhere ; and, as respects motion, [we shall best un- 
 stand it] if we consider none but local motion and 
 force, if we do not inquire what excites it (which, 
 however, I shall attempt to explain in its proper place). 
 
 There remain the senses, the affections, the appe- 
 tites, which also can be clearly understood if we care-
 
 202 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART II 
 
 fully avoid passing any judgment upon them except 
 in regard to precisely that which is contained in our 
 perception and of which we are inwardly conscious. 
 But this precaution it is very difficult to exercise, at 
 least in regard to the senses, because there is no one 
 of us who has not from infancy judged that all those 
 things which he perceives are things existing outside 
 his mind. and quite similar to his sensations, that is to 
 say, to the perceptions which he has of them ; so that 
 when, for example, we see a color, we think we see 
 something situated outside of us and quite similar to 
 that idea of color of which we then have experience 
 within ourselves ; and, on account of our habit of so 
 judging, we seem to see this so clearly and distinctly 
 that we hold it certainly and undoubtedly true. 
 
 The same thing is evident in respect to all other 
 sensations, even of pleasure and pain. For although 
 these .are not thought to be outside of us : neither yet 
 are they wont to be regarded as in the mind alone, or 
 in our perception, but as in the hand, or in the foot, 
 or in some other part of our body. Nor, indeed, is it 
 more certain when, for example, we perceive a pain 
 as if in the foot, that this is something existing out- 
 side our mind in the foot, than, when we see light as if 
 in the sun, that this light exists outside of us in the 
 sun ; but both these are prejudices of our early years, 
 as shall clearly be made apparent below. 
 
 But in order that we may distinguish at this point 
 what is clear from what is obscure, it is most carefully 
 to be noted that pain, indeed, and color, and other 
 [qualities] of this kind are clearly and distinctly un- 
 derstood, provided only they are regarded as affec- 
 tions of sense or as thoughts ; but when they are 
 judged to be things existing outside our minds, we
 
 METAPHYSICS] PRINCIPLES. 203 
 
 are able in no way to understand what sort of things 
 they are, and it is just the same when anyone says 
 that he sees in any body a color, or feels in any mem- 
 ber a pain, as if he should say that he sees or feels 
 there something of which he is quite ignorant, that is, 
 that he does not know what he sees or feels. For 
 although, if he attend but little, he may easily per- 
 suade himself that he has some notion of it, from the 
 fact that he supposes it to be something similar to 
 that sensation of color or of pain which he experi- 
 ences within himself, yet if he examine into the nature 
 of that which this sensation of color or of pain rep- 
 resents to him as being in a colored body, or as exist- 
 ing in the part affected, he will find that he knows 
 nothing at all about it. 
 
 [This will be apparent] if he considers that he knows 
 in a manner entirely different the natare of magnitude 
 in a visible body, or of figure, or motion (at least of 
 motion from place to place ; for philosophers who 
 feign that there are other forms of motion different 
 from this have shown that they little understood the 
 nature of this), or position, or duration, or number, 
 and the like, which it has just been said are clearly 
 perceived in bodies ; [that he knows these in a man- 
 ner entirely different from that] in which he knows 
 what in the same body color is, or pain, or smell, or 
 taste, or any of those [qualities] which are said to be 
 referred to the senses. For although in seeing any 
 body we are not more certain that it exists in so far 
 as it appears as having figure than as it appears 
 colored ; yet we know far more clearly what it is as 
 having figure than what it is as colored. 
 
 Manifestly, therefore, when we say that we per- 
 ceive colors in objects, it is in reality the same as say-
 
 204 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 ing that we perceive something in objects, the nature 
 of which we do not know, but something by which 
 there is produced in us a certain very clear and vivid 
 sensation which is called a sensation of color. But in 
 the mode of our judging there is a very great difference, 
 for so long that we judge only that there is something 
 in objects (that is, in things, whatever they may be, 
 from which the sensation comes to us) of which some- 
 thing we are indeed ignorant, we are so far from fall- 
 ing into error that on the other hand we avoid it, in 
 that by admonishing ourselves that we are ignorant 
 of this something we are the less prone to judge 
 rashly concerning it. 
 
 But when we think we perceive colors in objects, 
 although, indeed, we are ignorant what that may be, 
 which we then call by the name of color, nor are able 
 to recognize any similarity between the color which 
 we suppose to be in objects and that which we experi- 
 ence in the sense, nevertheless, because we do not 
 pay attention to this fact, and there are many other 
 things, such as magnitude, figure, number, etc., which 
 we clearly perceive to be felt or understood by us not 
 otherwise than as they are, or, at least, may be, in 
 objects, we easily lapse into this error, that we judge 
 that that which in objects we call color is altogether 
 like the color which we have in sensation, and so that 
 what we in no manner perceive we think we clearly 
 perceive
 
 THE WORLD; 
 OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT.
 
 THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT.* 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 Of the difference between our sensations and the things 
 which produce them. 
 
 PROPOSING, as I do, to treat of the nature of light, 
 the first thing of which I wish you to take note is, that 
 there may be a difference between the sensation 
 which we have in ourselves, that is to say, the idea 
 which is formed within our imagination by the help 
 of our eyes, and that which exists in the objects that 
 produce within us the sensation, namely, that which 
 exists in the flame, or in the sun, and is called by the 
 name of light ; because, although everyone is com- 
 monly persuaded that the ideas that we have in our 
 thought are altogether similar to the objects whence 
 they proceed, I see no reason, nevertheless, to assure 
 us that this is true ; but, on the contrary, I observe 
 many facts which should incline us to question it. 
 
 You know that words, while having no resemblance 
 to the things which they signify, do not fail to make 
 them intelligible to us, and often, even without our 
 paying attention to the sound of the words, or to 
 their syllables ; so that it may happen that after having 
 listened to a discourse, the meaning of which we have 
 
 * This is a fragment of the Treatise referred to in the Discourse 
 on Method as having been suppressed by the author. See (Euvres, 
 t. i, p. 168, Veitch's Descartes, p. 42 ; and above, pp. 10-12. 
 207
 
 208 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 completely understood, we are not able to say in what 
 language it was spoken. But if words, which signify 
 nothing except by human institution, are capable of 
 making conceivable for us things to which they have 
 no resemblance, why may not nature also have estab- 
 lished a certain sign which should make us feel the 
 sensation of light, although this sign should have 
 nothing in itself resembling sensation ? Has she 
 not thus appointed laughter and tears to make us 
 read joy and sadness in the human countenance? 
 
 But you will say, perhaps, that our ears make us 
 perceive in reality merely the sound of the words, and 
 our eyes only the face of him who laughs or who 
 weeps, and that it is our mind, which, having retained 
 what these words and this countenance signify, rep- 
 resents it to us at the same time. To that I may reply 
 that, just in the same way, it is our mind which rep- 
 resents to us the idea of light whenever the action 
 which signifies it touches our eye ; but, without 
 wasting time in dispute, I will at once bring forward 
 another illustration. 
 
 Do you think that when we pay no attention to the 
 meaning of words, and only hear the sound of them, 
 that the idea of this sound, which is formed within 
 our thought, is anything like the object which is the 
 cause of it ? A man opens his mouth, moves his 
 tongue, expels his breath; I see nothing in all these 
 motions which is not quite different from the idea of 
 the sound which they cause us to imagine. And most 
 philosophers assure us that the sound is nothing but 
 a certain trembling of the air which has just struck 
 our ears; so that, if the sense of hearing brought to 
 our thought the true image of its object, it would be 
 necessary, in place of making us conceive the sound,
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD J OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 209 
 
 that it should make us conceive the motion of the por- 
 tions of the air which is trembling at the time against 
 our ears. But because, perhaps, everybody will not 
 believe what the philosophers say, I will adduce still 
 another example. Touch is the one of all the senses 
 which we consider the least deceptive and the most 
 trustworthy ; so that, if I prove to you that even touch 
 makes us conceive many ideas which do not at all re- 
 semble the objects which produce them, I do not 
 think you ought to consider it strange if I say that 
 sight may do the same. 
 
 But there is no one who does not know that the ideas 
 of pleasure and of pain which are formed within our 
 thought on occasion of bodies touching us externally 
 have no resemblance to them. A person gently passes 
 a feather over the lips of a child asleep, and he per- 
 ceives the tickling; do you suppose that the idea of 
 the tickling which he conceives has any resemblance 
 to anything there is in the feather ? A soldier re- 
 turns from a fight; during the heat of the combat he 
 might have been wounded without perceiving it, but 
 now that he begins to cool off he feels pain, he 
 thinks he has been wounded; a surgeon is called, his 
 uniform is stripped off, he is examined, and at last it 
 is found that what he felt was nothing but a buckle or 
 a strap, which, being twisted underneath his uniform, 
 pressed upon him and hurt him. If his sense of 
 touch, while making him feel the strap, had im- 
 pressed the image of it on his thought, he would not 
 have needed a surgeon to tell him what he felt. 
 
 But I see no reason which obliges us to think that 
 what is in the objects from which the sensation of 
 light comes to us is any more like that sensation than 
 the action of a feather and a buckle is like the tick-
 
 210 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 ling and the pain ; and yet I have not adduced these 
 examples in order to make you believe absolutely that 
 this light is something different in the objects from 
 what it is in our eyes, but simply that you may question 
 it, and that, being on your guard against a prejudice 
 to the contrary, you may now the better inquire with 
 me into the true state of the case.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 211 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 /// what the heat and light of a fire consist. 
 
 I KNOW only two kinds of bodies in the universe in 
 which light is found, namely, the stars, and flame or 
 fire ; and because the stars are without question 
 further removed from the knowledge of men than fire 
 or flame is, I will attempt to explain in the first place 
 what I observe in respect to flame. When it burns 
 wood or any similar material, we can see at a glance 
 that it removes small particles of this wood, and sep- 
 arates them one from another, transforming thus the 
 finer parts into fire, into vapor and smoke, and leaving 
 the grosser parts as ashes. Anyone else, if he pleases, 
 may imagine in this wood the form of fire, the quality 
 of heat, and the energy which burns it, as all different 
 things ; as for me, who am afraid of deceiving myself 
 if I suppose anything more to be there than what I 
 see must necessarily be present, for my part, I am 
 content with conceiving there the movement of its 
 parts : because, put the fire there, put the heat there, 
 and make it burn as much as you please, if you do 
 not suppose, along with that, that there are some of 
 its parts in motion, and that they detach themselves 
 from their neighbors, I cannot imagine that it receives 
 any alteration or change ; and, on the contrary, re- 
 move the fire, remove the heat, prevent it from burn- 
 ing, provided only that you grant me that there is 
 some power which sets in violent motion its minutest 
 parts, and which separates them from the grosser
 
 212 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 parts, I find that that by itself could effect in it all 
 the changes which take place when it burns. 
 
 But, inasmuch as it does not seem to me possible to 
 conceive that one body can move another, unless it 
 is also in motion itself, I conclude from this that the 
 body of flame, which acts upon the wood, is composed 
 of small parts which are in motion separately one from 
 another, with a motion very rapid and very violent, 
 and which, thus moving themselves, push and move 
 with themselves the parts of the bodies which they 
 touch, and which do not offer them too great resist- 
 ance. I say that the parts move separately one from 
 another, because, although they often accord and con- 
 spire, many together, to produce a single effect, we 
 see nevertheless that each of them acts in its own par- 
 ticular way upon the bodies which they touch. I say, 
 also, that their motion is very rapid and very violent ; 
 because, being too small for sight to distinguish, they 
 would not have the force they do for acting on other 
 bodies, if the rapidity of their motion did not make 
 up for the want of its extent. 
 
 I add nothing in respect to the direction which each 
 part takes ; for if you consider that the power of mov- 
 ing itself, and that which determines the direction 
 which the movement shall take, are two entirely differ- 
 ent things, one of which might exist without the other 
 (as I have explained in the second discourse of the 
 Dioptrics*), you will readily decide that each moves 
 in the way that is made the least difficult to it by the 
 disposition of the bodies which surround it, and 
 that in the same flame there may be parts which 
 would move up and others down, in a straight line and 
 in a curve, and in all directions, without thereby 
 changing its nature at all ; so that, if you see almost 
 * (Euvre s, t. 5, p. 17, et seq.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 213 
 
 all of them tending upward, it need not be supposed 
 that this happens so for any other reason than that 
 the other bodies which touch them are almost in every 
 case disposed to offer them more resistance on every 
 other side. 
 
 But having taken note that the parts of the flame 
 move in this manner, and that it is sufficient to con- 
 ceive its motions in order to comprehend how it has 
 the power to consume wood and to burn, let us inquire, 
 pray, whether the same [conception] will not enable 
 us also to comprehend how it warms us and how it 
 illuminates us : for, if this should prove to be the case, 
 it will not be necessary that there should exist in it 
 any other quality, and we can say that it is this motion 
 alone which, according to the different effects which it 
 produces, is called now heat and now light. 
 
 But as concerns the nature of heat, the sensation 
 which we have of it may, as it seems to me, be re- 
 garded as a kind of pain when it is violent, and some- 
 times as a kind of pleasure when it is moderate ; and 
 as we have said before that there is nothing external 
 to our thought which is like the ideas that we conceive 
 of pleasure and pain, we can easily believe also that 
 there is nothing like that which we conceive of as 
 heat, but that whatever can put in motion in divers 
 ways the minute particles of our hands, or any other 
 portion of our body, may excite in us this sensation. 
 Many things which we experience also favor this view ; 
 for, in simply rubbing the hands, they become warm, 
 and every other body also may be made warm with- 
 out putting it before the fire, provided only it be 
 moved and shaken so that many of its minute particles 
 are set in motion, and along with them those of our 
 hands.
 
 214 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 As for what light is, it can easily be conceived that 
 the same motion which exists in the flame may be suf- 
 ficient to enable us to perceive it ; but inasmuch as it 
 is in this that the principal part of my design con- 
 sists, I wish to attempt to explain it at length, and 
 to carry on my discourse further.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 215 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 Of solids and fluids. 
 
 I CONSIDER that there is an infinity of different 
 motions which are perpetually going on in the uni- 
 verse, and after having observed the greater, which 
 make the days, the months, and the years, I take note 
 that the vapors of the earth do not cease to rise to- 
 ward the clouds and to descend from them, that the 
 air is always moved by the winds, that the sea is never 
 at rest, that the springs and the rivers flow without 
 ceasing, that the firmest buildings fall at last in de- 
 cay, that plants and animals do nothing but grow up 
 and perish ; in short, that there is nothing anywhere 
 which does not change. Whence I certainly know 
 that it is not in flame only that there is a multitude of 
 minute particles in incessant motion, but that they 
 exist also in all other bodies, although their actions 
 are not so violent, and, because of their minuteness, 
 they cannot be perceived by any of our senses. 
 
 1 am not going to stop to inquire into the cause of 
 their movements, because it is sufficient for my pur- 
 pose to suppose that they began to be in motion as 
 soon as the world began to exist, and, this being so, I 
 find by my reasonings that it is impossible that their 
 movements should ever cease, nor even change other- 
 wise than in the subject of them ; that is to say, that 
 the virtue or power of moving itself, which exists in 
 a body, may indeed pass, either wholly or in part, 
 into another, and thus nn longer exist in the first,
 
 216 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 but that it cannot be no longer at all in the world. 
 My reasonings, I say, satisfy my own mind with re- 
 gard to this, but there is no need that I state them to 
 you at present ; and still, if you please, you may 
 imagine, as do the majority of the learned, that there 
 is some primum mobile which, revolving about the 
 world with inconceivable velocity, is the origin and 
 source of all other movements which occur in it. 
 
 Now, in accordance with this view, there is afforded 
 an explanation of the cause of all the changes which 
 happen in the universe, and of all the varied phe- 
 nomena which appear upon the earth ; but I shall 
 here content myself with speaking of those which re- 
 late to my subject. 
 
 The difference which exists between hard bodies 
 and those which are liquid is the first that I desire 
 you to observe ; and, to this end, suppose that every 
 body be divisible into parts extremely small. I do 
 not wish to decide whether the number of them is in- 
 finite or not ; but it is certain, at least in relation to 
 our knowledge, that the number is indefinitely great, 
 and that we may suppose that there are many millions 
 in the smallest grain of sand which can be perceived 
 by our eyes. And observe, that if two of these mi- 
 nute parts touch each other without being in action, 
 in order to remove them the one from the other, some 
 force, however slight, is necessary to separate them ; 
 for when once they are so situated they will never 
 think of arranging themselves otherwise. Observe, 
 also, that twice as much force is necessary to separate 
 two of them as to separate one, and a thousand times 
 as much to separate a thousand ; so that if many 
 millions are to be separated all at once as, perhaps, 
 might be necessary to be done in order to break a
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 217 
 
 single hair it is no wonder if there is needed a force 
 great enough to be appreciable by the senses. 
 
 On the other hand, if two or more of these minute 
 particles touch only in passing and while they are in 
 motion, the one in one direction, the other in another, 
 it is certain that there will be required less force to 
 separate them than if they were entirely motionless ; 
 and even none at all, if the motion with which they 
 tend of themselves to separate is equal to or greater 
 than that with which one seeks to separate them. 
 Now I find no other difference between solid and 
 liquid bodies save that the particles of the one can be 
 separated from the mass much more easily than those 
 of the other. So that, to constitute the hardest body 
 imaginable, I hold that it is enough that all its parts 
 touch, without there remaining any space between 
 them, and without any of them having a tendency to 
 move, for what glue or what cement could be imag- 
 ined besides that, which could make them better hold 
 together ? 
 
 I suppose, also, that it is enough to constitute the 
 most liquid body which could be found, that all its 
 most minute particles should be moving in the most 
 various directions from one another and with the 
 utmost possible velocity, although at the same time 
 they do not lose the power of touching one another on 
 every side and of occupying as little space as if they 
 were motionless. In fine, I believe that every body 
 approaches more or less these two extremes, in pro- 
 portion as its particles have more or less the tendency 
 to withdraw from one another ; and all the phenomena 
 upon which I cast my eyes confirm me in this opinion. 
 
 Flame, of which I have already said that all its 
 particles are in perpetual motion, is not only liquid,
 
 2l8 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 but it also liquefies most other bodies. And observe 
 that when it melts metals it acts with no other power 
 than when it burns wood ; but because the particles 
 of metals are a little more nearly equal, it cannot 
 separate one without another, and thus make of them 
 bodies entirely liquid, whereas the particles of wood 
 are so unequal that it can separate the smallest 
 particles and liquefy them ; that is to say make them 
 fly off in smoke, without thus moving the grosser ones. 
 
 Next to flame there is nothing more liquid than air ; 
 and one may see at a glance that its particles move 
 separately one from another ; for, if you will con- 
 descend to notice those minute particles which are 
 commonly called motes, and which appear in sun- 
 beams, you will see, even if there is no wind moving 
 them, that they are incessantly flying hither and 
 thither in a thousand different directions. The same 
 thing can be shown in all the grosser liquids, if they 
 are mixed of divers colors the one with the other, so 
 as better to distinguish their movements. And finally, 
 this appears very clearly in strong acids, when they 
 move and separate particles of any metal. 
 
 But you may ask me at this point why, if it is the 
 motion only of the flame which makes it burn and be 
 liquid, the motion of the particles of the air, which 
 renders it also extremely liquid, does not impart to it 
 just the same power to burn, but, on the contrary, 
 makes it almost imperceptible to our hands. To 
 which I reply that it is necessary not only to take 
 account of the swiftness of the motion, but also of the 
 size of the particles, and that those are the smallest 
 which constitute the most liquid bodies, but those are 
 the largest which have the greatest power to burn, and, 
 in general, to act on other bodies.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 219 
 
 Observe, in passing, that I mean here, and that I 
 shall always mean hereafter, by a single particle, all 
 that is joined together and which has no tendency to 
 separate itself, although those which have very little 
 magnitude might easily be divided into many others 
 still smaller ; thus, a grain of sand, a stone, a rock, 
 the whole earth even, will be taken hereafter as a 
 single particle, in so far as we shall consider therein 
 only a motion entirely simple and uniform. 
 
 Now, between the particles of the air, if there are 
 any of them very large in comparison to the rest, as 
 are these motes which are seen in it, they move also 
 more slowly, and if there are any which move more 
 swiftly, they are also smaller ; but between the parts 
 of a flame, if there are any which are smaller than those 
 in the air, there are also greater ones, or at least there 
 is a greater number of those which are equal to the 
 greatest in the air, which at the same time move 
 much more swiftly, and it is only these last which 
 have power to burn. That it has smaller ones may 
 be conjectured from the fact that they penetrate 
 through many bodies the pores of which are so small 
 that the air even cannot enter them ; that it has greater, 
 or at least the large ones in greater number, is evident 
 from this, that the air alone is not sufficient to support 
 it ; that they move more rapidly the violence of their 
 action sufficiently attests ; and finally, that it is the 
 largest of these particles which have the power to 
 burn, and not the others, appears in this, that the flame 
 which comes from brandy or other highly rarefied 
 substances scarcely burns at all, and on the other hand 
 that which proceeds from hard and heavy substances 
 is very hot.
 
 220 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 Of vacuum; * and how it happens that our senses do 
 not perceive certain substances. 
 
 BUT we must inquire more particularly why the air, 
 being a substance as well as others, cannot as well be 
 perceived as they, and by this means deliver ourselves 
 from an error which has held possession of our minds 
 from infancy, since we have believed that there are 
 no other bodies about us than those which can be 
 perceived, and, accordingly, that although the air be 
 a substance, because we perceive it slightly, it cannot, 
 at any rate, be so material or so solid as those which 
 we perceive more sensibly. 
 
 In regard to which I desire first that you observe 
 that all bodies, solid as well as liquid, are composed 
 of one and the same matter, and that it is impossible 
 to conceive that the particles of this matter ever com- 
 pose a substance more solid, or which occupies less 
 space, than those do where each one of them is 
 touched on all sides by those which environ it ; 
 whence it follows, as it seems to me, that if there is a 
 vacuum anywhere, it must rather be in solid than in 
 liquid bodies ; for it is evident that the particles of 
 these latter may be more easily compressed and 
 brought to bear upon one another, because they are 
 in motion, than would be possible in the case of those 
 of others which are motionless. 
 
 *Princ., pt. ii, 16, 17, 18 (CEuvres, t. 3, p. 133, seg.); Veitch's 
 Descartes, p. 241.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 221 
 
 For example, if you put a powdered substance 
 into a vase, you shake the vase and strike it, in order 
 to get in more ; but if you pour into it any liquid, it 
 immediately takes up as little space as it can be made 
 to occupy. And, also, if you consider in this relation 
 some of the experiments which philosophers are wont 
 to make use of in order to show that there is no void 
 in nature, you will easily see that all those spaces 
 which people think are empty, and where they per- 
 ceive nothing but air, are at least as full, and filled 
 with the same matter, as those where they perceive 
 other bodies. 
 
 For, tell me, pray, what likelihood there is that 
 nature would make the heavier bodies rise and the 
 harder ones break, as we find that she does in certain 
 machines, rather than suffer that any of their parts 
 should fail to be in contact with each other, or with 
 some other bodies ; and that, nevertheless, she should 
 permit the particles of the air, which are so ready to 
 yield and to dispose themselves in every way, to 
 remain, some next others without being in contact on 
 all sides, or without there being any body between 
 them which they could touch ? Is it easy to believe 
 that the water in a well would rise upward, contrary 
 to its natural inclination, merely that the tube of a 
 pump might be filled, and to suppose that the water in 
 the clouds should not descend to fill the spaces below, 
 if there were never so little void between the particles 
 of the bodies which they contain ? 
 
 But you might here present a difficulty of consider- 
 able weight, namely, that the particles which compose 
 liquid bodies cannot, apparently, be in incessant 
 motion, as I have said they were, if there do not 
 exist empty space between them, at least in the
 
 222 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 places from which they start, in proportion to the 
 distance which they move. I should have some 
 trouble in meeting this objection had I not satisfied 
 myself, by various experiments, that all the motions 
 which take place on the earth are of a circular form ; 
 that is to say, that when a body quits its place, it always 
 enters that of another, and that one into that of 
 another, and so on up to the last, which takes, at the 
 same instant, the place left by the first, so that there 
 exists a void between them no more when they are in 
 motion than when they are at rest. And notice here 
 that it is not on this account necessary that all the 
 particles of a body which are in motion together 
 should be exactly arranged in a round line in the form 
 of a true circle, nor even that they should be of the 
 same size and figure ; for these inequalities may easily 
 be compensated by other inequalities in their velocity. 
 Now we do not ordinarily notice these circular 
 movements when bodies are moving in the air, because 
 we are accustomed to conceive the air only as an 
 empty space ;but watch the fish swimming in the basin 
 of a fountain ; if they do not come too near the sur- 
 face of the water they do not disturb it at all, although 
 they pass beneath it with very great swiftness; whence 
 it manifestly appears that the water which they push 
 before them does not push indiscriminately all the 
 water of the basin, but only that which can best 
 serve to complete the circle of their movement and 
 re-enter into the place which they leave behind. And 
 this example is enough to show how easy and familiar 
 to nature these circular movements are ; but I will now 
 adduce another, to show that there is never any other 
 than a circular movement. When the wine in a cask 
 does not flow out at the opening below, because the
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD J OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 223 
 
 one above is closed, it is incorrect to say, as is com- 
 monly said, that this is due to the " horror of a 
 vacuum." It is well understood that the wine has no 
 mind whereby it can fear anything ; and if it had, I 
 do not see what occasion it would have to fear that 
 vacuum, which is really nothing but a chimera ; but it 
 must be said rather that it cannot pass out of the 
 cask because the outside is as full as it can be, and 
 that the portion of the air, the place of which it 
 would occupy if it should descend, could find no 
 other where to bestow itself in all the rest of the uni- 
 verse, unless an opening were made at the top of the 
 cask, by which this air might remount in a circle to 
 the place left. 
 
 As for the rest, I will not affirm that there is no 
 void at all in nature ; I fear my discourse would run 
 on too long if I should undertake to explain what 
 there is of void ; and the facts I have just mentioned 
 are not sufficient to prove it, although they are 
 sufficient to convince us that the spaces where we per- 
 ceive nothing are filled with the same matter, and con- 
 tain at least as much of this matter as those which are 
 occupied with bodies which we perceive ; so that, when 
 a vase, for example, is full of gold or lead, it does 
 not, on that account, contain more matter than when 
 we think it is empty. This may seem very strange to 
 many whose mind does not reach beyond their fingers, 
 and who think there is nothing at all except what they 
 touch. 
 
 But when you shall have taken into consideration 
 what it is that makes us perceive a body or not per- 
 ceive it, I am sure you will not find anything incredible 
 in this, for you will clearly understand that, so far 
 from it being true that all the things which are about
 
 224 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 us are perceptible, on the contrary it is those which 
 are most commonly present which are the least so, and 
 those which are always present are never perceptible. 
 
 The heat of the heart is very great, but we do not 
 perceive it, because it is uniform ; the weight of the 
 body is not small, but it does not inconvenience us ; 
 we do not notice even that of our garments, because 
 we are accustomed to wear them ; and the reason for 
 this is clear enough, for it is certain that we cannot 
 perceive any body unless it cause some change in the 
 organs of our senses ; that is to say, unless it set in 
 motion in some way the minute particles of matter of 
 which these organs are composed ; which objects that 
 are not always present may easily do, provided they 
 have sufficient force; for if they consume something 
 in their action, nature can repair this afterward, when 
 they are no longer acting; but as for those substances 
 with which we are continually in contact, if they have 
 never had the power to produce any change in our 
 senses, and to set in motion any particles of their mat- 
 ter, it may be they have so powerfully excited them at 
 the beginning of our existence as to disunite them 
 entirely from the rest, and so they may have left there 
 only those which entirely resist their action, and by 
 means of which they could not in any way be per- 
 ceived ; whence you see that is no marvel that there 
 should be many spaces around us where we do not 
 perceive any substance, although they may contain no 
 fewer than those where we perceive many. 
 
 But it is not necessary on that account to suppose 
 that this grosser air, which we draw into our lungs in 
 breathing, which becomes wind when set in motion, 
 which appears hard to us when confined in a balloon, 
 and which is composed only of exhalations and vapors,
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD J OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 225 
 
 is as solid as water or the earth. We must follow in 
 this the common opinion of philosophers, all of whom 
 assure us that it is more rare. And this is easily as- 
 certained by experience, for the particles of a drop of 
 water being separated from one another by the agi- 
 tation of heat can make much more of this air than 
 the space where the water was could contain; whence 
 it certainly follows that there is a great number of 
 minute interspaces between the particles of which it 
 is composed; for there is no way of conceiving, other- 
 wise, a rare body. But because these interspaces can- 
 not be empty, as I have said above, I conclude from 
 all this that there are of necessity some other bodies, 
 one or many, mixed with this air, which fill as com- 
 pletely as possible the minute interspaces which exist 
 between its particles. There now remains only to 
 consider what these other bodies may be, and after 
 that I hope it will not be difficult to comprehend the 
 probable nature of light.
 
 226 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 Of the number of elements and their qualities. 
 
 PHILOSOPHERS assure us that there is, above the 
 clouds, a certain air far more rare than ours, and 
 which is not composed of vapors of the earth, as this 
 is, but constitutes an element by itself. They say, 
 also, that above this air there is still another substance 
 yet more rare, which they call the element of fire. 
 They add further that these two elements are mingled 
 with the water, the air, and the earth in the compo- 
 sition of all inferior bodies ; so that I only follow their 
 opinion if I say that this more subtle air and this 
 element of fire fill the interspaces which are between 
 the particles of the grosser air which we breathe, 
 so that these substances, intermixed with one another, 
 compose a mass which is as solid as any substance 
 can be. 
 
 But in order that I may make you better understand 
 my thought upon this subject, and that you may not 
 suppose that I would have you believe all that philos- 
 ophers tell us about the elements, I must describe them 
 to you in my own way. 
 
 I conceive the first, which may be called the ele- 
 ment of fire, as a liquid the most subtle and pene- 
 trating in the universe ; and, in accordance with what 
 has been said above concerning the nature of liquid 
 bodies, I imagine its particles much smaller and as 
 moving much more swiftly than those of other bodies ; 
 or rather, in order not to be compelled to admit any
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 227 
 
 vacuum in nature, I do not attribute to it particles 
 having any size or determinate figure, but I am per- 
 suaded that the impetuosity of its movement is suffi- 
 cient to cause it to be divided in every form and 
 manner on meeting with other bodies, and that its 
 particles change their form at every instant to accom- 
 modate themselves to the spaces which they enter, so 
 that there is never a passage so narrow, nor any angle 
 so small, between the particles of other bodies, where 
 those of this element cannot penetrate without diffi- 
 culty, and which they cannot fill completely. 
 
 As for the second, which may be taken for the 
 element of air, I conceive it, indeed, also, as a very 
 rare liquid, when compared with the third : but, when 
 compared with the first, it is necessary to attribute 
 some magnitude and some figure to each of its 
 particles, and to imagine them almost entirely round 
 and joined together, like grains of sand and dust ; so 
 that they cannot so easily come in contact nor press 
 so much against one another but that there always 
 remain about them many small interstices, into 
 which it is the easier for the first element to glide, 
 because they have to undergo no change of form in 
 order exactly to fill them. And so I am persuaded 
 that this second element cannot be so pure in any 
 part of the universe that it has not always in it some 
 small part of the matter of the first. 
 
 Besides these two elements I recognize only a third, 
 namely that of earth, the particles of which I suppose 
 to be as much larger and as moving with as much less 
 rapidity in comparison to those of the second, as the 
 latter do in comparison with those of the first ; and, 
 also, I think it sufficient to conceive it as one or 
 as many great masses, the parts of which have very
 
 228 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 little or no motion whatever, which should make them 
 change their position with respect to one another. 
 
 If you are surprised that, for the explanation of 
 these elements, I make no use of the qualities called 
 heat, cold, moisture, dryness, as do the philosophers, 
 I will inform you that these qualities appear to me 
 to need explanation themselves, and that, if I am not 
 mistaken, not only these four qualities, but also all 
 the rest, and, indeed, all the forms of inanimate bodies, 
 can be explained without the necessity of supposing 
 for this purpose anything else in their matter than 
 the motion, size, figure, and arrangement of these 
 particles ; accordingly, I can easily make you under- 
 stand why I accept no other elements than those I 
 have described ; for the difference which would exist 
 between them and the bodies which philosophers call 
 mixed, or mingled, and composite, consists in this, 
 that the forms of those composite bodies always con- 
 tain in themselves some qualities which are hostile 
 and harmful, or, at least, which do not tend to mutual 
 preservation ; whereas the forms of elements should 
 be simple and have no qualities which do not perfectly 
 agree together so perfectly that each should tend 
 to the preservation of all the rest. Examine, as much 
 as you please, all the forms which the various motions, 
 the various figures, and sizes, and the different ar- 
 rangement of the particles of matter can impart to 
 composite bodies, and I assure you that you will not 
 find one which has not in it qualities which cause it 
 to change, and which, in changing, would reduce itself 
 to some one of those of the elements. 
 
 As for example, flame the form of which requires it 
 to have particles which move very swiftly and which, 
 at the same time, must have some magnitude, as has
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 229 
 
 been said above cannot exist long without consuming 
 itself ; for either the magnitude of its particles, im- 
 parting to them energy of action upon other sub- 
 stances, will cause their motion to be diminished, or the 
 violence of their motion, shattering them when they 
 clash against other substances, will cause them some 
 loss of magnitude ; and, in this way, they might, little 
 by little, be reduced to the form of the third element, 
 or to that of the second, and even, also, some of them 
 to that of the first. And thereby you may understand 
 the difference between this flame, or common fire, as 
 we know it, and the element of fire which I have de- 
 scribed. And you should also know that the elements 
 of air and of earth, that is to say the second and third 
 elements, are not more similar to the grosser air which 
 we breathe and this earth upon which we walk ; but 
 that, in general, all the substances which exist about 
 us are mixed or composite, and subject to decay. 
 
 And yet it must not be supposed on that account 
 that the elements have no places in the universe par- 
 ticularly assigned to them, and where they can per- 
 petually preserve themselves in their native purity ; 
 but, on the contrary, since each particle of matter 
 tends always to reduce itself to some one of its forms, 
 and, once being reduced thereto, it never tends to leave 
 it, although indeed God might have created at the 
 beginning only composite bodies ; nevertheless, during 
 the time the universe has existed, all bodies have had 
 sufficient time to leave their own forms and take those 
 of the elements ; so that now there is great proba- 
 bility that all bodies, which are large enough to be 
 reckoned among the more important parts of the uni- 
 verse, have each of them only the quite simple form 
 of one of the elements, and that composite substances
 
 230 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 exist nowhere else than upon the surfaces of these 
 great bodies : but they must necessarily exist there ; 
 for, the elements being hostile by nature, two of them 
 cannot come into contact without each acting upon 
 the surface of the other, and thus imparting to the 
 matter which is there the different forms of composite 
 substances. 
 
 In reference to which, if we consider, in general, all 
 the bodies of which the universe is composed, we shall 
 mid only three kinds which can be called great and be 
 reckoned among its principal portions : that is to say, 
 the sun and fixed stars for the first, the heavens for 
 the second, and the earth, with the planets and the 
 comets, for the third ; we have, therefore, good reason 
 for thinking that the sun and fixed stars have no other 
 form than that of the first element quite pure ; the 
 heavens, that of the second ; and the earth, with the 
 planets and the comets, that of the third. 
 
 I put the planets and the comets with the earth, 
 because seeing that they resist the light as it does, 
 and reflect its rays, I can perceive no difference. I 
 put the sun with the fixed stars, and attribute to them 
 a nature quite opposite to that of the earth, for the 
 action of their light alone convinces me that their 
 substance is of a matter extremely rare and mobile. 
 
 As for the heavens, inasmuch as they cannot be 
 perceived by our senses, I think I am right in attribut- 
 ing to them an intermediate nature, between that of 
 the luminous bodies, the action of which we perceive, 
 and that of the hard and heavy substances, the resist- 
 ance of which we feel. 
 
 Finally, we are not aware of the existence of com- 
 posite bodies in any other place than upon the surface 
 of the earth ; and when we consider that the whole
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 231 
 
 space which contains them namely, all that which lies 
 between the highest clouds and the deepest mines 
 which the greed of man has dug to extract the metals 
 is extremely small in comparison of the earth and the 
 immense expanse of the sky, we can easily imagine 
 that these composite bodies, all taken together, are 
 only the outside rind which has been formed upon 
 the surface of the earth by the motion and mixture of 
 the matter of the heavens which surround it. 
 
 And thus we shall have occasion to think that not 
 only in the air that we breathe, but also in all other 
 composite substances, even to the hardest stones and 
 the heaviest metals, there are particles of the ele- 
 ment of air mixed with those of the earth, and con- 
 sequently, also, particles of the element of fire, be- 
 cause this is always found in the pores of that of the 
 air. 
 
 But it is to be observed that, although there are 
 particles of these three elements mingled with each 
 other in all these substances, it is, properly speaking, 
 only those which on account of their size or the 
 difficulty with which they move, are to be referred to 
 the third, which compose all the substances which we 
 perceive around us ; for the particles of the two other 
 elements are so rare that they cannot be perceived by 
 our senses ; and thus all these substances can be im- 
 agined as being sponges, in which, although there are 
 a quantity of pores or holes which are always full of 
 air or water, or some similar liquid, it is, nevertheless, 
 not supposed that these liquids enter into the com- 
 position of the sponge. There still remain many 
 other things for me to explain, and I should be very 
 glad to add some reasons to make my views seem 
 more probable, but in order that the length of this
 
 232 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 discourse may seem the less tedious to you, I wish to 
 clothe a part of it in the guise of a fable, through 
 which I hope the truth will not fail sufficiently to ap- 
 pear, and will be no less agreeable to look upon than 
 if I should present it quite naked.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 233 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 Description of a new world and of the qualities of the 
 matter of which it is composed. 
 
 LET, then, your thought pass for a little while beyond 
 this world, that you may behold another wholly new 
 one, which I shall cause to rise to view in imaginary 
 spaces. Philosophers tell us that these spaces are in- 
 finite ; and they surely ought to be believed, since it 
 is themselves who have made them ; but that this 
 infinity may not hinder us or prove an embarrass- 
 ment, let us not try to get to the end of it : let us 
 proceed so far only as to lose sight of all the creatures 
 God has made in five or six thousand years ; and when 
 we have come to a stand there at some fixed point, 
 let us imagine that God creates anew all around us 
 so much matter as that, whatever direction our imagi- 
 nation may take, it shall discover no empty place. 
 Grant that the ocean is not infinite, those who are 
 upon a ship in the middle of it can extend their view 
 apparently to infinity, and nevertheless there is water 
 beyond what they can see ; thus, although our imagi- 
 nation seems to be able to stretch to infinity, and this 
 new matter may not be supposed to be infinite, we 
 may nevertheless well suppose that it fills spaces far 
 greater than all those we shall have imagined ; and 
 yet, in order that there may be no ground for objec- 
 tion in all this, let us not allow our imagination to 
 stretch itself as far as it can, but let us purposely con- 
 fine it within a certain space, which need not be very
 
 234 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 great for example, the distance between the earth and 
 the principal stars of the firmament ; and let us sup- 
 pose that the matter which God shall have created 
 stretches far beyond, to an indefinite distance in all 
 directions ; for this is, indeed, more likely, and we can 
 more easily prescribe limits to the activity of our 
 thought than to the works of God. 
 
 Now, since we take the liberty to fashion this matter 
 according to our fancy, we will attribute to it, if you 
 please, a nature in which there is nothing at all that 
 anyone cannot know as perfectly as possible ; and, 
 in order to this, let us suppose expressly that it has 
 not the form of earth, or fire, or air, or of any other 
 thing in particular, as wood, stone, or metal ; nor the 
 qualities of being hot or cold, dry or moist, light or 
 heavy ; or that it has any taste, or odor, or sound, or 
 color, or light, or other similar quality, in the nature 
 of which it could be said there was something which 
 is not clearly known by everybody. 
 
 And, on the other hand, let us not think of it as 
 being that primary matter of philosophers, which has 
 been so stripped of all its forms and qualities that 
 there is nothing remaining which can be clearly con- 
 ceived ; but let us conceive of it as a true substance 
 perfectly solid, which uniformly fills all the length, 
 breadth, and depth of that great space, in the midst of 
 which we have stayed our thought, so that each one 
 of its particles always occupies a portion of that space 
 so related to its magnitude that it could not fill a 
 greater, nor contract itself into a less, nor allow, 
 while it remains there, any other to enter it. 
 
 Add to this, that this matter can be divided into all 
 the parts and according to all the figures we can im- 
 agine, and that each one of its parts is capable of tak-
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 235 
 
 ing on also all the motions which we can conceive of ; 
 and suppose, further, that God has actually divided it 
 into many such parts, some greater, some smaller ; 
 some of one figure, others of another, whatever we 
 may be pleased to fancy ; not that, in doing so, he has 
 separated them from one another, so that there should 
 be any empty space between two of them ; but let 
 us suppose that the only distinction to be met with 
 consists in the variety of the motions he gives to 
 them, in causing that, at the very instant that they are 
 created, some of them begin to move in one direction, 
 others in another ; some more swiftly, others more 
 slowly (or, if you please, not at all), and that they 
 continue thereafter their motions according to the 
 ordinary laws of nature ; for God has so marvelously 
 ordained these laws that, although we should sup- 
 pose that he had created nothing more than what I 
 have said, and even that he had established therein 
 no order or proportion, but that he had made a 
 chaos the most confused and the most perplexed 
 that poets could describe, they would be sufficient 
 to cause the parts of this chaos to disentangle them- 
 selves, and to arrange themselves in such good order 
 that they would take the form of a very perfect 
 world, and one in which not only light would be 
 seen, but also all other things, in general and partic- 
 ular, which appear in this real world. 
 
 But, before I go on to explain this more at length, 
 pause to consider yet a little further this chaos, and 
 observe that it contains nothing which is not so per- 
 fectly known to you that you cannot even pretend to 
 be ignorant of it ; for as to the qualities I have as- 
 signed to it, if you have attended, you have noticed 
 that I have supposed such only as you could conceive.
 
 236 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 And as for the matter of which I have composed it, 
 there is nothing more simple or more easy to under- 
 stand in the inanimate world ; and the idea of it is so 
 comprehended in all those objects which our imagina- 
 tion can frame that it must necessarily be that you 
 conceive it, or that you could never conceive anything. 
 Nevertheless, since philosophers are so acute that 
 they know how to find difficulties in things which 
 seem extremely clear to other men, and the recollec- 
 tion of their primary matter which they know to be 
 very hard to conceive of might prevent them from 
 understanding that of which I am speaking, I must 
 tell them just here that, if I am not mistaken, the 
 whole difficulty which they experience in regard to it 
 arises from their desire to distinguish it from its 
 quantity and extension, that is to say, from its prop- 
 erty of occupying space ; wherein, indeed, I am quite 
 willing that they should think themselves to be right, 
 for I do not mean to stop to refute them ; but on 
 their part they ought not to find it strange if I 
 suppose that the quantity of the matter which I have 
 described does not differ from its substance any more 
 than number does from things numbered, and if I 
 conceive its extension, or its property of occupying 
 space, not at all as an accident, but as its true form 
 and its essence ; for they cannot deny that it is very 
 easy to conceive it in this way. 
 
 And my purpose is not to explain, like them, 
 things which really exist in the actual world ; but 
 simply to fancy one at pleasure, in which there should 
 be nothing which the dullest minds are not capable 
 of conceiving, and which might not, nevertheless, be 
 created just as I have imagined it. If I should in- 
 troduce therein the least thing which should prove
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 237 
 
 obscure, it would be owing to the fact that included 
 in that obscurity there was some concealed contradic- 
 tion of which I had not been aware, and thus, without 
 knowing it, I had supposed something impossible ; 
 whereas, on the other hand, if I am able distinctly to 
 conceive all I include in it, it is certain that, although 
 there may be nothing like it in the old [real] world, 
 God might nevertheless create it in a new one, for it 
 is certain that he can create everything we can con- 
 ceive.
 
 238 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 Of the natural laws of this new world. 
 
 BUT I will not longer delay to tell you by what 
 reasons nature alone will be able to disentangle the 
 confusion of the chaos of which I have spoken, and 
 what are the laws which God has imposed upon it. 
 
 Know, then, in the first place, that by nature I do 
 not here understand any goddess or any other sort 
 of imaginary power, but I make use of this word to 
 signify matter itself, in so far as I consider it with all 
 the qualities I have attributed to it, taken as a whole, 
 and under this condition, that God continues to pre- 
 serve it in the same way that he has created it ; for, 
 from the simple fact that he continues thus to preserve 
 it, it necessarily follows that there must be many changes 
 in its parts, which not being, as it seems to me, prop- 
 erly attributed to the Divine activity, because that 
 does not change, I attribute them to nature ; and the 
 rules in accordance with which these changes occur I 
 call the laws of nature. 
 
 In order the better to understand this, remember 
 that among the qualities of matter we have supposed 
 that its particles have had various motions from the 
 instant of their creation, and, besides that, they are 
 all in contact on every side, so that there is no empty 
 space between any two of them ; whence it follows of 
 necessity that at the time they began to move they 
 began to change also and to vary their movements as 
 they encountered one another ; and thus, even if God
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD J OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 239 
 
 preserved them thereafter in the same manner as he 
 created them, he does not preserve them in the same 
 condition that is to say, while God always acts in the 
 same way, and consequently always produces the 
 same effect in substance, there result, as it were by 
 accident, many diversities in this effect. 'And it is 
 easy to believe that God, who, as everybody ought to 
 know, is immutable, acts always in the same way. 
 But without involving myself further in these meta- 
 physical considerations, I will lay down two or threel 
 principal rules in accordance with which it must bel 
 thought that God causes the nature of this new worldj 
 to act, and which are sufficient, as I believe, to enable 
 you to comprehend all the rest. 
 
 The first is, that each individual particle of matterf 
 remains always in one and the same state, so long as* 
 contact with others does not compel it to change it ; 
 that is to say, if it have a certain magnitude it will 
 never become smaller, unless others divide it ; if it be 
 round or square, it will never change this figure, un- 
 less the rest compel it to do so ; if it be at rest in any 
 place, it will never leave it, unless others drive it 
 therefrom ; and if it have once begun to move, it will 
 continue always to move with uniform energy until 
 others stop or retard it. 
 
 There is no one who does not believe that this same 
 rule is of force in the old [real] world, in respect to 
 magnitude, figure, rest, and a thousand other matters 
 of like kind ; but philosophers have made an excep- 
 tion in the case of motion, which is, nevertheless, the 
 thing which I desire most expressly to include in it. 
 Do not think, however, that I intend to oppose them : 
 the motion of which they speak is so very different from 
 that which I have in mind, it may easily happen that
 
 240 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 what is true of the one should not be so of the other. 
 They admit themselves that the nature of theirs is 
 very little understood, and to render it intelligible in 
 any way they have been unable to explain it more 
 clearly than in these terms : motus est actus entis in 
 potentia prout in potentia est, which are so obscure to 
 me that I am constrained to leave them here in their 
 own language, because I cannot interpret them (and 
 indeed these words, le mouvement est Vacte (Tun fare 
 en puissance, en tant quil est en puissance, are no clearer 
 in French). But, on the other hand, the nature of 
 the motion I intend here to speak of is so easy to 
 comprehend, that the geometers themselves, who, of 
 all men, have made the greatest efforts to conceive 
 very distinctly the things they have treated of, have 
 judged the nature of motion more simple and more 
 intelligible than that of their surfaces and their lines, 
 as appears in the fact that they have explained the 
 line by the motion of a point, and the surface by that 
 of a line. 
 
 The philosophers suppose, also, many motions which 
 they think could occur without a body changing its 
 place, as those which they call motus adformam, motus 
 ad calorem, motus ad quantitatem (motion as to form, 
 motion as to heat, motion as to quantity), and a thou- 
 sand others : for my part, I know of none more easy 
 to conceive than the lines of the geometers, which 
 bodies make in passing from one place to another 
 and successively occupying all the spaces between 
 the two. 
 
 Besides, they attribute to the least of these motions 
 an existence much more substantial and real than 
 they do to rest, which they say is merely privation ; 
 for my part, I conceive that rest is as much a quality
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 241 
 
 to be attributed to matter, so long as it remains in one 
 place, as motion is, so long as it changes its place. 
 
 Finally, the motion of which they speak is of a 
 nature so strange that, whereas all other things have 
 for their end their perfection, and aim only to pre- 
 serve themselves, this has no other end or aim but 
 rest, and, contrary to all the laws of nature, it aims at 
 its own destruction ; but, on the contrary, that which 
 I have in mind follows the same laws of nature which 
 bring about in general all the arrangements and all 
 the qualities which are found in matter, as well as 
 those which the learned call modos et cntia rationiscum 
 fundamento in re (modes and entities of reason with 
 foundation in things), together with qualitates reales 
 (real qualities), in which I candidly confess that I find 
 no more reality than in the rest. 
 
 I suppose, for the second rule, that when one body| 
 impels another, it cannot impart to it any motionj 
 without at the same time losing so much of its own, 
 nor take from it but so much as its own is thereby in- 
 creased. This rule, together with the preceding, 
 agrees very well with all the facts which we observe 
 when a body begins or ceases to move, on account of 
 being pushed or stopped by another. For, having as- 
 sumed the preceding rule, we are free from the diffi- 
 culty in which the learned find themselves when they 
 wish to give a reason why a stone continues to move 
 for some time after it has left the hand of one who 
 has thrown it ; for we ought rather to ask ourselves 
 why it should not continue to move on forever. But 
 the reason is easy to give ; for who can deny that 
 the air in which it is moving offers it some re- 
 sistance ? We can hear the air whistle when it is 
 parted, and if set in motion by a fan, or any other
 
 242 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 very light and very broad body, it can be sensibly felt 
 by the hand that it hinders the movement rather than 
 helps it, as some would have us say. But if the effect 
 of its resistance is not explained according to our 
 second rule, and it is thought that the more a body 
 can resist the more capable it becomes of stopping 
 the movement of others, as perhaps one might at first 
 be inclined to think, there would be considerable dif- 
 ficulty in giving a reason why the movement of this 
 stone is sooner overcome when it meets a soft body, 
 the resistance of which is moderate, than when it 
 meets a harder one which resists it more ; as, also, why, 
 as soon as it has made a slight effort against this last, 
 it instantly returns upon its path rather than arrest or 
 interrupt its motion on account of it. Whereas, ad- 
 mitting this rule, there is no difficulty at all ; for it 
 instructs us that the motion of a body is not retarded 
 on meeting another in proportion to the degree with 
 which this resists it, but only in proportion to the 
 degree in which its own resistance of it is overcome, 
 and that, in submitting to it, it receives into itself the 
 energy of motion which the other loses. 
 
 Now, although in most of the movements which we 
 observe in the real world, we might not perceive that 
 the bodies which begin or cease to move are impelled 
 or arrested by any others, we have no ground on that 
 account to conclude that these two rules are not ex- 
 actly observed ; for it is certain that these bodies may 
 frequently be set in motion by the two elements of air 
 and fire, which are always intermixed with them, 
 though they cannot be perceived there, as was said a 
 while ago ; or even by this grosser atmosphere, which 
 also cannot be perceived ; and that they may be able 
 to transmit it presently to this grosser air, and again
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD J OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 243 
 
 to the whole mass of the earth, in which, being dis- 
 persed, it may also not be perceived. 
 
 But although all that our senses have ever experi- 
 enced in the real world might appear contrary to 
 these two rules, the reason which has indicated 
 them to me seems so strong that I cannot help 
 thinking myself obliged to admit them in the new one 
 which I am describing to you ; for what firmer or 
 more solid foundation could be found to establish a 
 truth, although one were at liberty to choose what he 
 would, than the constancy and immutability of God ? 
 
 Now these two rules follow manifestly from the 
 simple fact that God is immutable, and that, acting 
 always in the same way, he produces always the same 
 effect : for granting that he has put a certain quantity 
 of motion into all matter universally at the first in- 
 stant that he created it, it must be admitted that he 
 also preserves as much of it there, or else it cannot be 
 thought that he acts always in the same way ; and 
 granting with this that from that first instant the va- 
 rious parts of matter, in which these motions are found 
 unequally distributed, have begun to retain them or 
 to transfer them one to another, according as they 
 had power to do, it must necessarily be thought that 
 he makes them always continue to do the same thing ; 
 and this is what these two rules contain. 
 
 I will add, for the third, that when a body moves, 
 although its movement is most frequently in a curved 
 line, and can never be otherwise than circular in some 
 . degree, as has been said above, nevertheless each one 
 of its particles in particular tends always to continue 
 its own motion in a straight line. And so their action 
 that is to say, their inclination to move is different 
 from their movemen"
 
 244 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 For example, if a wheel be turned on its axle, 
 although all its parts move in a circle, because being 
 joined together they could not move otherwise, never- 
 theless their tendency is to move in a right line, as 
 plainly appears if by chance any one is detached from 
 the rest ; for as soon as it is set free, its movement 
 ceases to be circular, and it continues on in a straight 
 line. Likewise, when a stone is whirled in a sling, 
 not only does it go in a straight line as soon as it 
 leaves it, but further, all the time it is in it, it presses 
 upon the center of the sling, and stretches the cord, 
 thus showing plainly that it always has a tendency to 
 go in a straight line, and that it moves in a circle only 
 by constraint. 
 
 This rule rests on the same foundation as the other 
 two, and depends only on the fact that God preserves 
 each thing by one continuous activity, and that, conse- 
 quently, he does not preserve it such as it may have 
 been some time before, but precisely such as it is 
 at the very instant that he preserves it. Now the 
 case is that, among all movements, that which is in a 
 straight line is the only one which is entirely simple, 
 and one the whole nature of which may be embraced in a 
 single instant; for, in order to conceive it, it is enough 
 to think of a body actually moving in one fixed direc- 
 tion, which is the case in every one of the instants 
 which can be determined during the time it is in 
 motion ; whereas, to conceive circular movement, or 
 any other that can exist, it is necessary to consider at 
 least two of these instants, or rather two of its parts, 
 and the relation between them ; but in order that 
 philosophers, or sophists rather, may not take occasion 
 here to practice their superfluous subtleties, notice 
 that I do not say that movement in a straight line can
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 245 
 
 take place in an instant, but simply that all that is re- 
 quired to produce it exists in the body in every in- 
 stant which can be determined during its movement, 
 and not all that is required to produce the cir- 
 cular It must then be said, according to 
 
 this rule, that God alone is the author of all the move- 
 ments in the universe, in so far as they exist, and in 
 so far as they are in straight lines; but that there are 
 various arrangements of matter which render them 
 irregular and curved, just as theologians teach us that 
 God is the author of all our actions, in so far as they 
 exist, and in so far as they have any goodness in 
 them, but that it is the various dispositions of our 
 wills which make them bad. 
 
 I might add here many rules to determine in par- 
 ticular when, and how, and how much the movement 
 of any body can be deflected, and increased or di- 
 minished, by meeting others, in which are summarily 
 comprehended all natural phenomena ; but I shall 
 content myself with informing you that, besides the 
 three laws which I have explained, I do not intend to 
 assume any others except those which follow infalli- 
 bly from the eternal verities upon which mathema- 
 ticians are wont to found their most certain and most 
 evident demonstrations ; those verities, I say, in ac- 
 cordance with which God himself has taught us that 
 he has disposed all things by number, weight, and 
 measure, and the knowledge of which is so natural to 
 our minds that we cannot help knowing them infallibly 
 when we conceive them distinctly, nor doubting that, 
 had God created many worlds, they would be no less 
 true in all than in this. 
 
 So that those who shall have sufficiently examined 
 the consequences of these verities, and of our rules,
 
 246 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 will be able to know effects by their causes, and, to 
 express myself in the language of the school, may 
 have a priori demonstrations of all that can come to 
 pass in this new world. And, in order that there may 
 be no exception whatever to embarrass us, we will add 
 to our assumptions, if you please, that God will never 
 work any miracle there, and that the intelligences, or 
 reasonable minds, which we shall hereafter assume to 
 be there, will never interfere in any way with the 
 ordinary course of nature. In what follows, never- 
 theless, I do not promise to place before you exact 
 demonstrations of all that I have to say; it will be 
 enough that I open the way by which you shall be able 
 to find them out for yourselves, when you will take 
 pains to seek them. Most minds are displeased when 
 things are made too easy for them. And to paint a 
 picture here which shall please you, I must make use 
 of shadows as well as colors. Accordingly, I shall con- 
 tent myself with following out the description which 
 I have begun, having no other design than to tell you 
 a story.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 247 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 Of the formation of the sun and the stars of this 
 new world. 
 
 WHATEVER inequality and confusion we might sup- 
 pose God had introduced at the beginning among 
 the particles of matter, it is necessary, according to the 
 laws which he has imposed upon nature, that nearly 
 all of them should afterward be reduced to one size 
 and one moderate motion, and thus that they should 
 take the form of the second element, such as I have 
 explained it above. For, considering this matter in 
 the state in which it might have been before God had 
 set it in motion, it should be conceived of as being 
 like the hardest and most solid body in the world. 
 And as one could not push a single particle of such a 
 body without also, by the same means, pushing or 
 drawing all the rest, so it must be thought that the 
 action or force of motion, or division, which at the 
 first had been placed in any of its particles, would 
 have expanded and distributed itself at the same 
 instant to all the rest as uniformly as possible. 
 
 It is true that this uniformity could not have been 
 absolutely perfect, for, in the first place, because 
 there is no void at all in this world, it would have 
 been impossible that all the particles of matter should 
 move in a straight line ; but being very nearly equal, 
 and one being almost as easily deflected as another, 
 they should all agree together in a circular motion of 
 some sort. And nevertheless, inasmuch as we sup-
 
 248 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 pose that God has moved them variously at the first, 
 we must not think that they would all agree in re- 
 volving about a single center, but about many differ- 
 ent ones, which we may conceive of as being differently 
 situated with respect to one another. 
 
 Accordingly, we must conclude that they would 
 naturally be in less rapid motion, or smaller, or both 
 at once, in the places nearer these centers than in those 
 more remote : for all having a disposition to continue 
 their movement in a straight line, it is certain that 
 those are the strongest that is, the largest, among 
 those which may be equally swift in their motion, and 
 the swiftest among those which may be equal in size 
 which have to describe the greater circles, as being 
 the nearest to the straight line. And as for the 
 matter contained between three or more of these 
 circles, it might well be at first much less divided and 
 less swift in its motion than all the rest ; and what is 
 more, inasmuch as we suppose that God at the begin- 
 ning has put all sorts of inequality into the different 
 parts of this matter, we ought to think that from that 
 time it has had all sorts of sizes and shapes, and has 
 been disposed to move, or not to move, in every way 
 and manner. 
 
 But this does not prevent them afterward becoming 
 nearly all uniform, especially those which remain at 
 an equal distance from the centers around which they 
 revolve ; for, being unable to move independently, it 
 was necessary that the swifter communicate of their 
 motion to those which had less, and that the greater 
 break up and divide, in order to be able to pass over 
 the same spaces as those which preceded them, or, at 
 least, that they mount higher ; and thus they would 
 arrange themselves, in a short time, all in order, so
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 249 
 
 that each one would find itself more or less distant 
 from the center around which it had taken its course, 
 according as it had more or less of size or swiftness 
 than the rest ; and also, inasmuch as size always con- 
 flicts with speed, it must be thought that the most 
 distant from each center were those which, being a 
 little smaller than those nearer, have been also much 
 swifter. 
 
 The same would be true of their figures. Although 
 we may suppose that these at the beginning were of 
 every sort, and that they had, for the most part, many 
 angles and many sides, like the pieces which split off 
 from a stone when it is broken, it is certain that 
 afterward, in moving and striking against one an- 
 other, they would have rubbed off, little by little, the 
 small points of their angles, and blunted the edges of 
 their sides, until they became by degrees almost all 
 round, as grains of sand and flint do when rolled 
 about in running water ; so that there might not now 
 be any noticeable difference between those which are 
 near enough together, nor even between those which 
 are very distant, except in the fact that they can move 
 a little faster, and be a little smaller or larger, one than 
 the other ; and this does not prevent our attributing 
 to all of them the same form. Only an exception 
 must be made of some which, having been from the 
 first much larger than the rest, have not so easily be- 
 come divided, or which, having had very irregular and 
 resistant shapes, have tended to unite in a mass rather 
 than to break up and become round, and thus they 
 have retained the form of the third element, and 
 have served to compose the planets and the comets, 
 as I shall hereafter explain to you. 
 
 Further, it is to be noted that the matter which has
 
 250 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 come off from the surface of the parts of the second 
 element, in proportion as they have broken up and 
 blunted the sharp corners of their angles in becoming 
 round, has necessarily acquired a motion much swifter 
 than theirs, and at the same time a facility of dividing 
 and changing its shape at every moment to accom- 
 modate itself to that of the places where it happens 
 to be, and so it has taken the form of the first element. 
 It is also to be noted that what there is of this first 
 element, more than is needed to fill the small inter- 
 spaces that the particles of the second, which are 
 spherical, necessarily leave around them, must move 
 toward the centers about which they [the particles of 
 the second element] revolve, because these occupy all 
 the other places more distant, and that it must there 
 form round bodies perfectly liquid and rare, which, 
 turning incessantly much more rapidly and in the 
 same direction as the particles of the second element 
 which environ them, have power to increase the mo- 
 tion of those to which they are nearest, and also to 
 push them all in every direction, drawing them from 
 the center toward the circumference, so that they also 
 push one another, and this by a mode of action which 
 it is necessary that I presently describe as exactly as 
 I am able to do ; for I apprise you here in advance 
 that it is this action which we take to be light, just as 
 we take those round bodies composed of matter of 
 the first element quite pure, the one to be the sun, the 
 others to be the fixed stars, of the new world I am de- 
 scribing to you, and the matter of the second element, 
 which revolves around them, to be the heavens
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 251 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 Of the origin and course of the planets and comets in 
 general, and in particular of the comets. 
 
 Now, to begin to speak to you of the planets and 
 comets, consider that as respects the diversity o.~ the 
 parts of the matter which I have assumed, although 
 the larger part of them, through clashing and breaking 
 up on encountering one another, would take the form 
 of the first or second element, there would still be 
 found two sorts which have necessarily retained the 
 form of the third, namely, those whose figure was so 
 extended and so resistant that, on meeting one an- 
 other, it was easier for several of them to join together 
 and by this means to become larger, than to break up 
 and become smaller ; and those which were from the 
 beginning the largest and most massive of all were 
 well able to break and shatter the others on striking 
 them, but not, reciprocally, to be broken and shattered. 
 If now, you should conceive that these two sorts of 
 parts were at first in very rapid motion, or even that 
 they moved very slowly, or not at all, it is certain that 
 afterward they would have to move at the same rate 
 as the matter of the heavens which contained them ; 
 for, if at first they were moved more swiftly than this 
 matter, as they would unavoidably push it forward as 
 they encountered it in their path, they must in a short 
 time have transferred to it a part of their own mo- 
 mentum ; and if, on the contrary, they had not in 
 themselves any disposition to move, nevertheless,
 
 252 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 being surrounded on all sides by this matter of the 
 heavens, they would necessarily have followed its 
 course ; just as we see every day that boats and 
 various other bodies which float upon the water, the 
 largest and most massive, as well as the smallest, fol- 
 low the current of the water in which they are, when- 
 ever there is nothing else to prevent them. 
 
 And observe that, among the various bodies which 
 thus float upon the water, those which are solid and 
 massive enough, as boats commonly are, especially 
 the larger and more heavily laden, have always much 
 more force than it to continue their movement, even 
 though it may be from it alone that they have received 
 it ; and that, on the contrary, those which are very 
 light, such as the masses of white foam which are seen 
 floating along on rivers during a storm, have less of 
 it. So that if you imagine two rivers which unite at 
 a certain point and separate soon after, before their 
 waters, which must be conceived as very calm and 
 quite uniform in force, but also very rapid, have had 
 time to mingle, boats or other bodies massive and 
 heavy enough, which are carried along by the current 
 of one, might easily pass into the other, whereas the 
 lighter ones would keep separate from it, and be borne 
 by the force ot this stream toward parts where it is 
 less rapid 
 
 From this illustration it is easy to understand that, 
 in whatever place there may be found, at the begin- 
 ning, parts of matter which could not take the form 
 of the second element, nor of the first, all the largest 
 and most massive among them would have been com- 
 pelled in a short time to take their course toward the 
 outer circle of the heavens which contain them, and 
 to pass continually thereafter from one of these
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 253 
 
 heavens into another, without ever stopping for any 
 long time together in the same heavens ; and that, on 
 the contrary, all the less massive must have been 
 pushed in turn toward the center of the heavens 
 which contained them, by the current of the matter 
 of those heavens ; and that, considering the forms I 
 have attributed to them, they must, on meeting, have 
 united themselves many of them together, and formed 
 those great globes which, revolving in the heavens, 
 have there a motion the resultant of all those which 
 their parts would have when moving separately, so 
 that some of them would tend toward the circum- 
 ferences of these heavens, and others toward their 
 centers. And understand that it is those which 
 tend thus to move toward the center of any heavens 
 that we must here call the planets, and those which 
 pass across the different heavens we must call 
 comets. 
 
 Now, in the first place, in regard to the comets, it 
 must be observed that there would be but few of them 
 in this new world, in comparison to the number of 
 the heavens ; for although, indeed, there might have 
 been many of them at the beginning, they must, in 
 course of time, in their passage across the different 
 heavens, nearly all of them have struck against one 
 another and gone to pieces, as I have said two vessels 
 might do by running into one another, so that only 
 the biggest might now remain. It is necessary, also, to 
 observe that, when they pass thus from one heaven 
 into another, they always push before themselves a 
 little of the matter of that which they leave, and re- 
 main for some time enveloped in it, until they have 
 entered pretty well within the borders of the next 
 heavens ; on being there, they finally free themselves
 
 254 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 of it all at once, as it were, and without taking any 
 more time perhaps than the sun does to rise in the 
 morning above our horizon ; so that they move much 
 more slowly when they tend to pass out of any heaven 
 than they do a little after entering it. ...
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 255 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 Of the planets in general, and in particular of the earth 
 and the moon. 
 
 THERE are, likewise, in regard to the planets, 
 many things to be noted: the first of which is that, 
 although they all tend toward the centers of the 
 heavens which contain them, they never can reach 
 those centers ; for, as I have already said above, it is 
 the sun and the fixed stars which occupy them 
 
 If I have not yet made you sufficiently understand 
 the cause which makes the parts of the heaven which 
 are outside [the orbits of the planets], being incom- 
 parably smaller than the planets, have greater power 
 than these to continue their movement in a straight 
 line, consider that this force does not depend solely 
 on the quantity of the matter in each body, but also 
 on the extent of its surface. For although when two 
 bodies are moving with equal velocity, it may be cor- 
 rect to say that if one contain twice as much matter 
 as the other, it has, also, twice as much momentum ; 
 it cannot on that account be said that it has twice 
 as much power to continue to move in a straight line ; 
 but it will have just twice as much if, along with that, 
 its surface be exactly twice as great, because it will 
 always meet twice as many other bodies which will 
 resist it ; and it will have much less if its surface is 
 much more than twice as great. 
 
 Now you know that the particles which compose the 
 heavens are almost quite spherical, and so they have
 
 256 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 that figure which of all others contains the most matter 
 within the least surface ; and that, on the contrary, the 
 planets, being composed of small parts which are of 
 very irregular and extended figure, have great surface 
 in proportion to the quantity of their matter, so that 
 they may have much more than most of the parts 
 of the heaven, and yet also have less than some of 
 the smaller parts and those nearer the centers ; for 
 it must be understood that, as between two globes 
 quite solid as are those parts of the heaven the 
 smaller has always more surface, in proportion to its 
 quantity, than the larger has. 
 
 And all this may easily be confirmed by experience. 
 For if a great globe, made of the boughs of trees 
 all matted together, as the parts of the matter com- 
 posing the planets may be conceived as being, should 
 be set in motion, it is certain that it would not con- 
 tinue its movement so far, although impelled by a 
 force entirely proportionate to its size, as would an- 
 other globe much smaller and made of the same wood, 
 but quite solid ; it is certain, also, quite to the con- 
 trary, that another globe might be made of the same 
 wood and quite solid, but which should be so ex- 
 tremely small that it would have much less power to 
 continue its movement than the first ; finally, it is 
 certain that this first would have more or less power 
 to continue its movement, according as the boughs 
 which composed it were more or less large and com- 
 pacted together. From this you see how different 
 planets may be suspended within the outermost circle 
 at different distances from the sun, and how it is not 
 those simply which appear the largest outside, but 
 those which are in their interior most solid and mas- 
 sive, which must be the more distant.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 257 
 
 It is to be observed, further, that as we find that 
 boats which follow the current of a river never move 
 so swiftly as the water which bears them, nor the 
 largest among them so fast as the smallest ; so, 
 although the planets follow the course of the matter 
 of the heavens without resistance, and move by the 
 same impetus as that, it cannot be said, on that ac- 
 count, that they ever move so swiftly ; and, also, the 
 inequality of their movement must have some relation 
 to that which exists between the greatness of their 
 mass and the smallness of the parts of the heavens 
 which environ them. The reason of which is this, 
 that, generally speaking, the larger a body is, the easier 
 it is for it to communicate a part of its motion to 
 other bodies, and the more difficult for other bodies 
 to communicate to it any of theirs ; for although many 
 small bodies, when combining together to act upon a 
 greater, might have as much force as it, nevertheless 
 they never could make it move so fast in every way 
 as they move themselves ; because, if they agree in 
 certain of their movements which they communicate 
 to it at the same time, they inevitably differ in 
 others which they do not communicate to it. 
 
 Now, there follow from this two things, which 
 seem to me to be of considerable importance : the 
 first is that the matter of the heavens must not only 
 cause the planets to revolve about the sun, but also 
 about their own center (except when there is any par- 
 ticular cause to hinder them), and, accordingly, that it 
 must be composed of small heavens around them 
 which move in the same way as the greater. And the 
 second is that, if there meet together two planets un- 
 equal in size, but so situated as to take their course 
 in the heavens at the same distance from the sun, so
 
 258 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 that one were exactly so much more solid than the 
 other was large, the smaller of these two, having a 
 motion more rapid than the larger, will unite itself 
 with the small heaven which is around this larger one 
 and revolve continually with it.* .... 
 
 * This celebrated theory of the vortices (les tourbillons) is more 
 fully set forth, and illustrated by diagrams, in Les Principes de la 
 Philosophie, iii, 30-157 (CEuvres, t. 3, pp. 198-329).
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 259 
 
 CHAPTER XI. 
 
 Of Gravity. 
 
 BUT I desire now that you consider what the 
 gravity of this earth is, that is to say, the force which 
 unites all its parts, and which makes them all tend 
 toward its center, everyone more or less according as 
 they are more or less large and solid ; which is 
 nothing else and consists only in this, that the parts 
 of the small heaven which surrounds it, turning much 
 more swiftly than its own do around its center, tend 
 also with much more force to withdraw themselves 
 from it, and consequently push them back there. 
 
 In which if you find any difficulty from the fact 
 that I have said so many times that the more massive 
 and solid bodies, such as I have assumed the comets 
 to be, would tend toward the circumference of these 
 heavens, and it would be only the less so which 
 would be pushed back toward their centers, as if it 
 should follow from that it would be only the less solid 
 parts of the earth which could be pushed toward its 
 center, and the others would necessarily withdraw 
 from it ; observe that, when I said that the most solid 
 and massive bodies tend to withdraw from the center 
 of a heaven, I assumed that they were moving already 
 with the same impetus as the matter of that heaven : 
 because it is certain that if they had not yet begun to 
 move, or if they were in motion, provided this motion 
 were less rapid than was necessary to follow the 
 current of this matter, they must be forced by it
 
 260 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 toward the center around which it turned ; and, also, 
 it is certain that, in proportion as they were greater 
 and more solid, they would be pushed with more 
 force and swiftness. 
 
 And nevertheless, this would not prevent that, if 
 they were solid enough to compose comets, they 
 would tend but little toward the exterior circles of the 
 heavens, inasmuch as the energy which they should 
 have acquired in descending toward any one of 
 their centers would inevitably impart to them force 
 to pass beyond it and reascend toward its circum- 
 ference 
 
 Now it is evident that a stone, containing in itself 
 more of the matter of the earth, and in return contain- 
 ing much less of that of the heaven, than a quantity of 
 air of equal extent, and also its parts being less im- 
 pelled by the matter of this heaven than that of this air, 
 it would not have power to mount above it, but rather, 
 on the contrary, it would have power to make this 
 descend below it, so that the air would be light when 
 compared with the stone ; but heavy when com- 
 pared with the heaven itself 
 
 And you can understand from this that the argu- 
 ments which many philosophers employ, to refute the 
 motion of the real earth, have no force at all against 
 that of the earth which I am describing to you ; 
 as when they say that if the earth were in motion 
 heavy bodies would not fall plumb toward its center, 
 but rather would stray this way and that toward the 
 sky, and that cannon pointed toward the west would 
 carry much further than when pointed toward the 
 east, and that great winds would be felt and great 
 noises heard in the air, and such like things, which 
 could happen only on the supposition that the earth
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 261 
 
 is not carried forward by the current of the heaven 
 which surrounds it, but is moved by some other force 
 and in some other way than this heaven moves. 
 
 [Chapter xii., Of the Ebb and Flow of the Sea, requiring dia- 
 grams, is omitted.]
 
 262 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 CHAPTER XIII. 
 
 Of Light. 
 
 I HAVE repeatedly said that bodies which revolve 
 in a circle tend always to withdraw from the centers 
 of the circles which they describe ; but I must here 
 determine more precisely in what directions the parts 
 of the matter of which the heavens and the stars are 
 composed have a tendency to move. And accord- 
 ingly, it must be understood that when I speak of a 
 body tending to move in any direction, I do not 
 wish it to be supposed on that account that it has in 
 it any thought or design which carries it hither, but 
 simply that it is disposed to move that way, whether 
 it actually does move thither, or some other body 
 prevents it from doing so ; and it is principally in this 
 latter signification that I employ the word " tend," 
 because it seems to signify some effort, and all effort 
 presupposes resistance. Now, inasmuch as there are 
 often various causes which, acting together upon the 
 same body, counteract one another, it may be said, 
 for various reasons, that the same body tends to move 
 in different directions at the same time, as has just 
 been said that the particles of the earth tend to with- 
 draw from its center, so long as they are considered 
 independently, and that they tend on the contrary to 
 approach it when the force of the particles of the 
 heavens which push them thither is considered ; and 
 again that they tend to withdraw from it when con- 
 trasted with other terrestrial particles which compose
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 263 
 
 bodies more massive than they are. As, for example, 
 a stone whirled in a sling.* .... 
 
 Still further I replyf that their other motions 
 which continue in them [the particles of the second 
 element], while thus advancing toward the circum- 
 ference, not allowing them to remain a single instant 
 arranged in the same way, prevent them from com- 
 ing in contact, or at least cause that as soon as 
 they touch they instantly separate again, and thus 
 they do not cease to advance without interruption 
 toward the circumference until the whole space is 
 filled. Accordingly we can draw from this no other 
 conclusion than that the force by which they tend 
 toward [the circumference] is probably, as it were, a 
 tremulous one, and increases and diminishes in vary- 
 ing minute vibrations, according as they change their 
 situation, which seems to me a property very well 
 
 agreeing with light Finally, the particles of 
 
 the first element which . . . compose the body of the 
 sun, revolving in a circular manner very swiftly about 
 [its center], tend to scatter themselves in every direc- 
 tion in straight lines As for the rest, although 
 
 they must thus advance toward [the circumference] 
 if this space be occupied only by the first element, it 
 is certain that they tend to move thither just the same 
 if it be filled with any other body, and that, conse- 
 quently, they push and strive against this body, as it 
 were, to drive it from its place. So that if the eye of 
 a man should be at [a point in this circumference] it 
 would be really pushed upon by the sun as much as 
 by any of the matter [in the intervening space.] Now 
 
 * The various tendencies to move in different directions are 
 then described and illustrated by diagrams. 
 
 f In response to an objection suggested by the author himself.
 
 264 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARl'ES. [PART III 
 
 it is to be understood that the inhabitants of this 
 new world are of such a nature that, when their 
 eyes are thus pushed upon, they have a sensation 
 in every respect resembling that which we have of 
 light.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 265 
 
 CHAPTER XIV. 
 Of the properties of light. 
 
 BUT I wish to delay a little longer at this point to ex- 
 plain the properties of the energy (de I' action) by which 
 their eyes can be excited. For they agree so perfectly 
 with those which we observe in light, that when you 
 shall have considered them, I am sure that you will 
 declare, as I do, that there is no need of conceiving 
 in the stars, nor in the heavens, any other quality than 
 this energy, which is called by the name of light.* 
 
 The principal properties of light are : i, That it 
 spreads itself around on all sides about bodies which 
 we call luminous ; 2, and to every degree of dis- 
 tance ; 3, and instantaneously ; 4, and usually in 
 straight lines, which must be understood as rays of 
 light ; 5> ar >d that many of these rays, coming from 
 different points, may gather at one point ; 6, or, com- 
 ing from the same point, may proceed to different 
 points ; 7, or, coming from different points, and going 
 toward different points, may pass by the same point 
 without interference with one another ; 8, and that 
 they may also sometimes hinder one another, to wit, 
 when their force is very unequal, and that of some is 
 very much greater than that of others ; 9, and finally, 
 that they can be turned aside by reflection ; 10, or 
 by refraction; u, and that their force may be in- 
 creased ; 12, or diminished by the different disposi- 
 tions or qualities of the matter which receives them. 
 
 * Cette action, qui s'appelle du nom de lumire.
 
 266 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 These are the principal properties observed in light, 
 all of which agree with this energy, as you shall 
 see : 
 
 1. That this energy must spread itself in all direc- 
 tions around luminous bodies, the reason whereof is 
 evident, because it is from the circular movement of 
 their particles that it proceeds. 
 
 2. It is also evident that it can extend itself to every 
 degree of distance ; because, for example, supposing 
 that the particles of the heavens which are contained 
 in the space between [the sun and some point in the 
 circumference of those heavens] are already of them- 
 selves disposed to move toward [the circumference], as 
 we have said they are, it cannot be doubted that the 
 force with which the sun impels those which are 
 [about it] must make them reach as far as the [circum- 
 ference], even although it were a distance greater than 
 that between the most distant stars of the firmament 
 and ourselves. 
 
 3. And considering that the particles of the second 
 element which are between [the sun and some point 
 on the circumference] touch upon and press each 
 other as much as possible, it cannot be doubted also 
 that the energy by which the first are impelled must 
 pass in an instant as far as the last, just as that by 
 which one end of a stick is pushed passes in the same 
 instant to the other end 
 
 4. In regard to the lines along which this energy is 
 communicated, and which are properly rays of light, 
 it must be observed that they differ from the particles 
 of the second element, by the medium of which this 
 same energy is propagated, and that they are nothing 
 material in the medium through which they pass, but 
 that they signify simply in what way and in what di-
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 267 
 
 rection the luminous body acts upon that which it 
 illuminates ; and thus they are not to be conceived 
 otherwise than as exactly straight, although the par- 
 ticles of the second element, which serves to transmit 
 this energy or light, might almost never be so directly 
 situated one after another as to compose perfectly 
 straight lines 
 
 9, 10. As for reflection and refraction, I have al- 
 ready sufficiently explained them elsewhere.* Never- 
 theless, because for the illustration of the movement, 
 I then made use of a ball instead of speaking of rays 
 of light, in order by this means to make my discourse 
 more intelligible ; it remains to me here to bring to 
 your attention the fact that the energy, or inclination 
 to move, which is transmitted from one place to an- 
 other by means of many bodies which are in contact 
 and which exist without break throughout all the 
 space between both, follows precisely the same path 
 wherein this same energy might cause the first of these 
 bodies to move, if the others were not in its way, with 
 no other difference except that time would be required 
 for this body to move, whereas the energy which is in 
 it may, through the intervention of those which are in 
 contact with it, extend itself to all distances in an in- 
 stant ; whence it follows that, in like manner as a ball 
 is reflected when it hits against the wall of a tennis- 
 court, and that it suffers refraction when it enters 
 obliquely into water, or passes out of it, so also when 
 the rays of light meet a body which does not allow 
 them to pass through, they must be reflected ; and 
 when they enter obliquely into any place through 
 which they can extend themselves more or less easily 
 than through that whence they proceed, they must 
 
 * La Dioptrique, Discours second. (Euvres, t. v, p. 17.
 
 268 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 also, at the point of this change, be deflected and 
 suffer refraction. 
 
 u, 12. Finally, the energy of light is not only more 
 or less great in each place, according to the quantity 
 of rays which meet there, but it can also be increased 
 and diminished by the different dispositions of the 
 bodies which happen to be in the places through 
 which it passes, just as the velocity of a ball or stone 
 thrown into the air may be increased by the winds 
 which blow in the same direction in which it is moving, 
 and diminished by those which oppose it.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 269 
 
 CHAPTER XV. 
 
 That the heavens of this new world must appear to its 
 inhabitants the same as ours. 
 
 HAVING thus explained the nature and properties 
 of that energy which I understand light to be, it is 
 necessary also that I explain how by means of it the 
 inhabitants of the planet, which I have assumed for 
 the earth, may see the face of their heavens as one 
 quite like ours. In the first place, there is no doubt 
 that they must see the [central body] all full of light 
 and like our sun, seeing that that body sends its rays 
 from every point of its surface toward their eyes ; and 
 because it is much nearer them than the stars, it must 
 appear much larger 
 
 It must be understood that the great heavens, that 
 is to say, those which have a fixed star or sun for 
 their center, although, perhaps, quite unequal in ex- 
 tent, must always be of exactly equal energy ; for, if 
 this equilibrium did not exist, they would inevitably 
 perish in a short time, or at least they would change 
 
 until they acquired this equilibrium But it is 
 
 necessary that you further observe, in regard to their 
 situation, that the stars can never appear in the 
 
 places where they really are The reason of 
 
 this is that the [different] heavens being unequal in 
 extent, the surfaces which separate them never hap- 
 pen to be so disposed that the rays, which cross them 
 in going from these stars toward the earth, meet them
 
 270 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART III 
 
 at right angles ; and, meeting them obliquely, it is 
 certain, according to what has been shown in the "Diop- 
 trics,"* that they must be bent and suffer considerable 
 refraction, inasmuch as they pass much more easily 
 through one of the sides of this surface than through 
 the other 
 
 Consider, also, as regards the number of these stars, 
 that frequently the same one might appear in several 
 places, because of the different surfaces which deflect 
 its rays toward the earth . . . just as objects are 
 multiplied when seen through glasses or other trans- 
 parent bodies cut with many faces. 
 
 Further consider, in regard to their size, that 
 although they must appear much smaller than they 
 are, because of their extreme distance, and also that, 
 for the same reason, the larger part of them cannot 
 appear at all, and others can appear only as the rays 
 of many uniting together make the parts of the firma- 
 ment through which they pass a little whiter, and like 
 certain stars which astronomers call nebulous, or that 
 great belt of our heavens which the poets feign was 
 washed in the milk of Juno ; nevertheless, as for those 
 which are less distant, it is enough to assume them to 
 be about equal to our sun, in order to conclude that 
 they would appear as large as the largest in our world. 
 
 Besides that, it is very probable that the 
 
 [limiting] surfaces of the heavens being of an ex- 
 tremely fluid matter, which is incessantly in motion, 
 would constantly shake and undulate somewhat ; and, 
 consequently, that the stars which are seen through it 
 would appear scintillating and trembling, as it were, 
 as do our own, and also, because of their trembling, a 
 little larger, as does the image of the moon upon a 
 * Discours second, (Euzres, t. v, p. 21.
 
 PHYSICS] THE WORLD ; OR, ESSAY ON LIGHT. 271 
 
 lake, the surface of which is not greatly disturbed nor 
 tossed, but only slightly ruffled by a breeze. 
 
 And finally, it may come about that in course of 
 time these limiting surfaces change a little, or even 
 again that some [of them] bend as much in a short 
 time on occasion, it may be, of a comet approaching 
 them and, by this means, many stars appear, after a 
 long time, to be a little changed in position without 
 being so in magnitude, or slightly changed in magni- 
 tude without being so in position ; or even that some 
 begin suddenly to appear or to disappear, as is seen to 
 happen in the real world. 
 
 As for the planets and comets which are in the 
 same heavens as the sun, remembering that the par- 
 ticles of the third element of which they are composed 
 are so large, or so many of them compacted together, 
 that they can resist the action of light, it is easy to 
 understand that they must shine by means of the rays 
 that the sun sends toward them, and which they re- 
 flect thence toward the earth ; just as opaque or dark 
 objects in a chamber can be seen by means of the rays 
 which a torch lighted there sends toward them, and 
 which return thence toward the eyes of the observers. 
 And besides, the rays of the sun have a very consid- 
 erable advantage over those of a torch, which con- 
 sists in this, that their energy is preserved or even in- 
 creased more and more in proportion to their distance 
 from the sun, until they reach the exterior surface of 
 its heavens, because all the matter of those heavens 
 tends thither ; whereas the rays of a torch grow feebler 
 as they recede, in proportion to the extent of the 
 spherical surfaces which they illuminate, and also, in 
 some small degree, on account of the resistance of the 
 air through which they pass. Whence it arises that
 
 2?2 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 objects which are in the vicinity of the torch are no- 
 ticeably brighter than those which are at a distance 
 from it ; and that the inferior planets are not in the 
 same proportion more illuminated by the sun than the 
 superior, nor even than the comets, which are, beyond 
 comparison, more distant. 
 
 Now, experience shows that the same thing happens, 
 also, in the real world; and, nevertheless, I do not be- 
 lieve it possible to give a reason for it, if it be as- 
 sumed that light be anything else in objects than an 
 energy \une action] or disposition, such as I have ex- 
 plained it to be. I say an energy or disposition ; for if 
 you have paid good attention to what I have recently 
 proved, that, if the space where the sun is were quite 
 empty, the particles of its heavens would not cease to 
 tend toward the eyes of observers in the same way as 
 when they are impelled by its matter, and even with 
 almost as much force, you may easily conclude that 
 there would be hardly any need of its having in it any 
 activity, or even, as it were, any being, other than pure 
 space, in order to appear such as we see it. As to the 
 rest, the movement of these planets about their cen- 
 ter is the cause of their scintillating, yet much less 
 strongly and in a different way from the fixed stars ; 
 and, because the moon is devoid of this movement, 
 it does not scintillate at all.* .... 
 
 *The remainder of the treatise, about six pages, requiring dia- 
 grams, is omitted.
 
 SELECTIONS FROM THE TRACT ON 
 MAN, ETC.
 
 MAN.* 
 
 THESE men shall be composed, as we are, of a soul 
 and a body ; and I must describe to you first the body 
 by itself, afterward the soul, also by itself, and finally 
 I must show you how both these natures are to be 
 joined and united to compose men which resemble 
 us. 
 
 I assume that the body is nothing else than a statue 
 or machine of clay which God forms expressly to 
 make it as nearly like as possible to ourselves, so that 
 not only does he give it externally the color and the 
 form of all our members, but also he puts within it all 
 the parts necessary to make it walk, eat, breathe,' and 
 in fine imitate all those of our functions which may 
 be supposed to proceed from matter and to depend 
 merely on the arrangement of organs. 
 
 We see clocks, artificial fountains, mills, and other 
 similar machines, which, although made by men, are 
 not without the power of moving of themselves in 
 many different ways ; and it seems to me that I should 
 not be able to imagine so many kinds of movements 
 in this one, which I am supposing to be made by the 
 hand of God, nor attribute to it so much of artifice 
 that you would not have reason to think there might 
 still be more. 
 
 Now, I will not stop to describe to you the bones, 
 nerves, muscles, veins, arteries, stomach, liver, spleen, 
 heart, brain, nor all the other different parts of which 
 * CEuvres, t. iv, p. 335, seq.
 
 276 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART IV 
 
 it is to be composed ; for I assume them to be in 
 every respect similar to the parts of our own body which 
 have the same names, and which you can have shown 
 to you by any learned anatomist, at least those which 
 are large enough to be seen, if you do not already 
 know them well enough yourselves ; and as for those 
 which, because of their minuteness, are invisible, I 
 shall be able to make you more easily and clearly 
 understand them, by speaking of the movements which 
 depend upon them ; so that it is only necessary here 
 for me to explain in order these movements, and to 
 tell you by the same means what functions of our own 
 they represent 
 
 But what is here to be chiefly noted is that all the 
 most active, vigorous, and finest particles of the blood 
 tend to run into the cavities of the brain, inasmuch 
 as the arteries which carry them are those which come 
 in the straightest line of all from the heart, and, as 
 you know, all bodies in motion tend, as far as possible, 
 to continue their motion in a straight line 
 
 In regard to the particles of blood which penetrate 
 to the brain, they serve not only to nourish and sup- 
 port its substance, but chiefly, also, to produce there a 
 certain very subtle breath, or rather flame, very active 
 and very pure, which is called the animal spirits. 
 For it must be understood that the arteries which 
 carry them from the heart, after being divided into an 
 infinitude of small branches, and having formed those 
 small tissues which are spread like tapestries at the 
 base of the cavities of the brain, collect about a 
 certain small gland situated nearly at the middle of 
 the substance of the brain, just at the entrance of its 
 cavities, and have at this place a great number of 
 small openings through which the finest particles of
 
 PHYSIOLOGY] THE TRACT ON MAN. 277 
 
 the blood they contain can run into this gland, but 
 which are too narrow to admit the larger. 
 
 It must also be understood that these arteries do 
 not end there, but that many of them there joined 
 together in one they mount directly upward and 
 empty into that great artery which is like a Euripus 
 [aqueduct] by which the whole exterior surface of the 
 brain is irrigated. And, moreover, it is to be noted 
 that the larger particles of the blood may lose much 
 of their onward motion in the winding passages of the 
 small tissues through which they pass, inasmuch as 
 they have the power to push on the smaller ones 
 among them, and so transfer it to them ; but that 
 these smaller ones cannot in the same way lose their 
 own, inasmuch as it is even increased by that which 
 the larger transfer to them, and there are no other 
 bodies around them to which they can so easily trans- 
 fer it. 
 
 Whence it is easy to conceive that, when the larger 
 ones mount straight toward the exterior surface of 
 the brain, where they serve for the nourishment of its 
 substance, they cause the smaller and more rapidly 
 moving particles all to turn aside and enter into this 
 gland, which is to be conceived of as a very copious 
 fountain, whence they flow on all sides at once into 
 the cavities of the brain ; and thus, with no other prep- 
 aration or change, except that they are separated 
 from the larger, and that they still retain the extreme 
 swiftness which the heat of the heart has imparted to 
 them, they cease to have the form of blood and are 
 called the animal spirits. 
 
 Now, in proportion as these spirits enter thus the 
 cavities of the brain, they pass thence into the pores 
 of its substance, and from these pores into the nerves ;
 
 278 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART IV 
 
 where, according as they enter, or even only as they 
 tend to enter, more or less into some rather than into 
 others, they have the power to change the form of the 
 muscles into which their nerves are inserted and by 
 this means to cause all the limbs to move ; just as 
 you may have seen in grottoes and fountains in the 
 royal gardens that the force alone with which the 
 water moves, in passing from the spring, is enough to 
 move various machines, and even to make them play 
 on instruments, or utter words, according to the dif- 
 ferent arrangement of the pipes which conduct it. 
 
 And, indeed, the nerves of the machine that I am 
 describing to you may very well be compared to the 
 pipes of the machinery of these fountains, its muscles 
 and its tendons to various other engines and devices 
 which serve to move them, its animal spirits to the 
 water which sets them in motion, of which the heart is 
 the spring, and the cavities of the brain the outlets. 
 Moreover, respiration and other such functions as are 
 natural and usual to it, and which depend on the 
 course of the spirits, are like the movements of a clock 
 or a mill, which the regular flow of the water can keep 
 up. External objects which, by their presence alone, 
 act upon the organs of its senses, and which by this 
 means determine it to move in many different ways, 
 according as the particles of its brain are arranged, 
 are like visitors who, entering some of the grottoes of 
 these fountains, bring about of themselves, without in- 
 tending it, the movements which occur in their pres- 
 ence ; for they cannot enter without stepping on 
 certain tiles of the pavement so arranged that, for ex- 
 ample, if they approach a Diana taking a bath, they 
 make her hide in the reeds ; and, if they pass on in 
 pursuit of her, they cause a Neptune to appear before
 
 PHYSIOLOGY] THE TRACT ON MAN. 279 
 
 them, who menaces them with his trident ; or if they 
 turn in some other direction they will make a marine 
 monster come out, who will squirt water into their 
 faces, or something similar will happen, according to 
 the fancy of the engineers who construct them. And 
 finally, when the reasonable soul shall be in this ma- 
 chine, it will have its principal seat in the brain, 
 and it will be there like the fountain-maker, who 
 must be at the openings where all the pipes of 
 these machines discharge themselves, if he wishes to 
 start, to stop, or to change in any way their move- 
 ments.* .... 
 
 I desire you to consider next that all the functions 
 which I have attributed to this machine, such as the 
 digestion of food, the beating of the heart and arteries, 
 the nourishment and growth of the members, respira- 
 tion, waking, and sleeping ; the impressions of light, 
 sounds, odors, tastes, heat, and other such qualities 
 on the organs of the external senses ; the impression 
 of their ideas on the common sensef and the imagina- 
 tion ; the retention or imprinting of these ideas upon 
 the memory ; the interior motions of the appetites 
 and passions ; and, finally, the external movements of 
 all the members, which follow so suitably as well the 
 actions of objects which present themselves to sense, 
 as the passions and impressions which are found in 
 the memory, that they imitate in the most perfect 
 manner possible those of a real man ; I desire, I say, 
 that you consider that all these functions follow natu- 
 rally in this machine simply from the arrangement 
 of its parts, no more nor less than do the movements 
 
 * What intervenes is illustrated by diagrams and is therefore 
 omitted here. 
 
 f Sensus communis.
 
 200 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART IV 
 
 of a clock,* or other automata, from that of its 
 weights and its wheels; so that it is not at all necessary 
 for their explanation to conceive in it any other soul, 
 vegetative or sensitive, nor any other principle of mo- 
 tion and life, than its blood and its spirits, set in 
 motion by the heat of the fire which burns continually 
 in its heart, and which is of a nature no different from 
 all fires in inanimate bodies. 
 
 * Apparently the first suggestion of the comparison afterward 
 employed by Bontekoe(?) and by Leibnitz. See above, pp. 26 
 and 31.
 
 AUTOMATISM OF BRUTES. 
 Letter to the Marquis of Newcastle* 
 
 .... As for the understanding or thought attrib- 
 uted by Montaigne and others to brutes, I cannot hold 
 their opinion ; not, however, because I am doubtful of 
 the truth of what is commonly said, that men have abso- 
 lute dominion over all the other animals ; for while I 
 allow that there are some which are stronger than we 
 are, and I believe there may be some, also, which have 
 natural cunning capable of deceiving the most saga- 
 cious men ; yet I consider that they imitate or sur- 
 pass us only in those of our actions which are not 
 directed by thought ; for it often happens that we 
 walk and that we eat without thinking at all upon 
 what we are doing ; and it is so much without the 
 -use of our reason that we repel things which harm 
 us, and ward off blows struck at us, that, although we 
 might fully determine not to put our hands before our 
 heads when falling, we could not help doing so. I 
 believe, also, that we should eat as the brutes do, with- 
 out having learned how, if we had no power of thought 
 at all ; and it is said that those who walk in their 
 sleep sometimes swim across rivers, where, had they 
 been awake, they would have been drowned. 
 
 As for the movements of our passions, although in 
 ourselves they are accompanied with thought, because 
 we possess that faculty, it is, nevertheless, very evident 
 that they do not depend upon it, because they often 
 
 * CEuvres, t. ix, p. 423. 
 
 281
 
 282 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART IV 
 
 arise in spite of us, and, consequently, they may exist 
 in brutes, and even be more violent than they are in 
 men, without warranting the conclusion that brutes 
 can think ; in fine there is no one of our external ac- 
 tions which can assure those who examine them that 
 our body is anything more than a machine which 
 moves of itself, but which also has in it a mind which 
 thinks excepting words, or other signs made in re- 
 gard to whatever subjects present themselves, without 
 reference to any passion. I say words or other signs, 
 because mutes make use of signs in the same way as 
 we do of the voice, and these signs are pertinent ; but 
 I exclude the talking of parrots, but not that of the 
 insane, which may be apropos to the case in hand, 
 although it is irrational ; and I add that these words or 
 signs are not to relate to any passion, in order to ex- 
 clude, not only cries of joy or pain and the like, but, 
 also, all that can be taught to any animal by art ; for if 
 a magpie be taught to say " good- morning " to its mis- 
 tress when it sees her coming, it may be that the 
 utterance of these words is associated with the excite- 
 ment of some one of its passions ; for instance, there 
 will be a stir of expectation of something to eat, if it 
 has been the custom of the mistress to give it some 
 dainty bit when it spoke those words ; and in like 
 manner all those things which dogs, horses, and mon- 
 keys are made to do are merely motions of their fear, 
 their hope, or their joy, so that they might do them 
 without any thought at all. 
 
 Now, it seems to me very remarkable that language, 
 as thus defined, belongs to man alone ; for although 
 Montaigne and Charron have said that there is more 
 difference between one man and another than be- 
 tween a man and a brute, nevertheless there has
 
 PHYSIOLOGY] AUTOMATISM OP BRUTES. 283 
 
 never yet been found a brute so perfect that it has 
 made use of a sign to inform other animals of some- 
 thing which had no relation to their passions ; while 
 there is no man so imperfect as not to use such signs ; 
 so that the deaf and dumb invent particular signs by 
 which they express their thoughts, which seems to me 
 a very strong argument to prove that the reason why 
 brutes do not talk as we do is that they have no faculty 
 of thought, and not at all that the organs for it are 
 wanting. And it cannot be said that they talk among 
 themselves, but we do not understand them ; for, as 
 dogs and other animals express to us their passions, 
 they would express to us as well their thoughts, if they 
 had them. I know, indeed, that brutes do many 
 things better than we do, but I am not surprised at it; 
 for that, also, goes to prove that they act by force of 
 nature and by springs, like a clock, which tells better 
 what the hour is than our judgment can inform us. 
 Andy doubtless, when swallows come in the spring, 
 they act in that like clocks. All that honey-bees do 
 is of the same nature ; and the order that cranes keep 
 in flying, or monkeys drawn up for battle, if it be true 
 that they do observe any order, and, finally, the in- 
 stinct of burying their dead is no more surprising than 
 that of dogs and cats, which scratch the ground to 
 bury their excrements, although they almost never do 
 bury them, which shows that they do it by instinct 
 only, and not by thought. It can only be said that, 
 although the brutes do nothing which can convince 
 us that they think, nevertheless, because their bodily 
 organs are not very different from ours, we might 
 conjecture that there was some faculty of thought 
 joined to these organs, as we experience in ourselves, 
 although theirs be much less perfect, to which I have
 
 284 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART IV 
 
 nothing to reply, except that, if they could think as 
 we do, they would have an immortal soul as well as 
 we,* which is not likely, because there is no reason 
 for believing it of some animals without believing it 
 of all, and there are many of them too imperfect to 
 make it possible to believe it of them, such as oysters, 
 sponges, etc. 
 
 Letter to Henry Afore, 1649.! 
 
 .... But the greatest of all the prejudices we 
 have retained from infancy is that of believing that 
 brutes think. The source of our error comes from 
 having observed that many of the bodily members 
 of brutes are not very different from our own in 
 shape and movements, and from the belief that 
 our mind is the principle of the motions which 
 occur in us ; that it imparts motion to the body 
 and is the cause of our thoughts. Assuming this, 
 we find no difficulty in believing that there is in 
 brutes a mind similar to our own ; but having 
 made the discovery, after thinking well upon it, that 
 two different principles of our movements are to be 
 distinguished, the one entirely mechanical and cor- 
 poreal, which depends solely on the force of the ani- 
 mal spirits and the configuration of the bodily parts, 
 and which may be called corporeal soul, and the other 
 incorporeal, that is to say, mind or soul, which you 
 may define a substance which thinks, I have inquired 
 with great care whether the motions of animals pro- 
 ceed from these two principles or from one alone. 
 Now, having clearly perceived that they can proceed 
 from one only, I have held it demonstrated tha we 
 are not able in any manner to prove that there is in 
 
 * Cf. Butler's Analogy, Pt. i, chap. i. 
 
 f (Euvrt.t, t. x, p. 204.
 
 PHYSIOLOGY] AUTOMATISM OF BRUTES. 285 
 
 the animals*a soul which thinks. I am not at all dis- 
 turbed in my opinion by those doublings and cunning 
 tricks of dogs and foxes, nor by all those things which 
 animals do, either from fear, or to get something to 
 eat, or just for sport. I engage to explain all that 
 very easily, merely by the conformation of the parts of 
 the animals. Nevertheless, although I regard it as a 
 thing demonstrated that it cannot be proved that the 
 brutes have thought, I do not think that it can be 
 demonstrated that the contrary is not true, because 
 the human mind cannot penetrate into the heart to 
 know what goes on there ; but, on examining into 
 the probabilities of the case, I see no reason whatever 
 to prove that brutes think, if it be not that having 
 eyes, ears, a tongue, and other organs of sense like 
 ours, it is likely that they have sensations as we do, 
 and, as thought is involved in the sensations which 
 we have, a similar faculty of thought must be at- 
 tributed to them. Now, since this argument is within 
 the reach of everyone's capacity, it has held posses- 
 sion of all minds from infancy. But there are other 
 stronger and more numerous arguments for the op- 
 posite opinion, which do not so readily present them- 
 selves to everybody's mind ; as, for example, that it 
 is more reasonable to make earth-worms, flies, cater- 
 pillars, and the rest of the animals, move as machines 
 do, than to endow them with immortal souls. 
 
 Because it is certain that in the body of animals, as 
 in ours, there are bones, nerves, muscles, blood, ani- 
 mal spirits, and other organs, disposed in such a man- 
 ner that they can produce of themselves, without the 
 aid of any thought, all the movements which we ob- 
 serve in the animals, as appears in convulsive move- 
 ments, when, in spite of the mind itself, the machine
 
 286 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART IV 
 
 of the body moves often with greater violence, and 
 in more various ways than it is wont to do with the 
 aid of the will ; moreover, inasmuch as it is agreeable 
 to reason that art should imitate nature, and that men 
 should be able to construct divers automata in which 
 there is movement without any thought, nature, on 
 her part, might produce these automata, and far more 
 excellent ones, as the brutes are, than those which 
 come from the hand of man, seeing no reason any- 
 where why thought is to be found wherever we per- 
 ceive a conformation of bodily members like that of 
 the animals, and that it is more surprising that there 
 should be a soul in every human body than that there 
 should be none at all in the brutes. 
 
 But the principal argument, to my mind, which 
 may convince us that the brutes are devoid of reason, 
 is that, although among those of the same species, 
 some are more perfect than others, as among men, 
 which is particularly noticeable in horses and dogs, 
 some of which have more capacity than others to re- 
 tain what is taught them, and although all of them 
 make us clearly understand their natural movements 
 of anger, of fear, of hunger, and others of like kind, 
 either by the voice or by other bodily motions, it has 
 never yet been observed that any animal has arrived 
 at such a degree of perfection as to make use of a true 
 language ; that is to say, as to be able to indicate to us 
 by the voice, or by other signs, anything which could be 
 referred to thought alone, rather than to a movement 
 of mere nature ; for the word is the sole sign and the 
 only certain mark of the presence of thought hidden 
 and wrapped up in the body ; now all men, the most 
 stupid and the most foolish, those even who are de- 
 prived of the organs of speech, make use of signs,
 
 PHYSIOLOGY] AUTOMATISM OF BRUTES. 287 
 
 whereas the brutes never do anything of the kind ; 
 which may be taken for the true distinction between 
 man and brute. I omit, for the sake of brevity, the 
 other arguments which deny thought to the brutes. 
 It must, however, be observed that I speak of 
 thought, not of life, nor of sensation ; for I do not 
 deny the life of any animal, making it to consist solely 
 in the warmth of the heart. I do not refuse to them 
 feeling even, in so far as it depends only on the 
 bodily organs. Thus, my opinion is not so cruel to 
 animals as it is favorable to men ; I speak to those who 
 are not committed to the extravagances of Pythag- 
 oras, which attached to those who ate or killed them 
 the suspicion even of a crime 
 
 Letter to Mersenne, July 30, 1640.* 
 
 As for the brute beasts, we are so accustomed to 
 persuade ourselves that they feel just as we do, that it 
 is difficult to rid ourselves of this opinion ; but, if we 
 were also accustomed to see automata which should 
 imitate perfectly all those of our actions which they 
 could imitate and remain automata, we should have 
 no doubt whatever that all animals without reason are 
 also automata, because we should find just the same 
 differences between ourselves and them as between 
 ourselves and automata, as I have written on page 56 \ 
 of the Method ; and I have very particularly shown 
 in my World J how all the organs which are required 
 to produce all those actions which occur in automata 
 are found in the bodies of animals. 
 
 * (Euvres, t. viii, p. 299. 
 
 t OEuvrcs, t. i, p. 184; Veitch's Descartes, page 54. 
 
 \ In the part not published.
 
 SELECTIONS FROM THE PASSIONS OF 
 THE SOUL.
 
 THE PASSIONS OF THE SOUL.* 
 
 PART I. 
 
 ARTICLE I. 
 
 Passion, as respects the subject, is always action in 
 some other respect, 
 
 THERE is nothing which better shows how defect- 
 ive the sciences are which we have received from the 
 ancients than what they have written upon the pas- 
 sions ; for, although it is a subject the knowledge of 
 which has always been much sought after, and which 
 does not appear to be one of the more difficult 
 sciences, because everyone, feeling the passions in 
 himself, stands in no need whatever of borrowing any 
 observation elsewhere to discover their nature, never- 
 theless, what the ancients have taught on this sub- 
 ject is of so little consequence, and for the most part 
 so untrustworthy, that I cannot have any hope of 
 reaching the truth, except by abandoning the paths 
 which they have followed. That is the reason why I 
 shall be obliged to write now in the same way as I 
 should if I were treating a topic which no one before 
 me had ever touched upon ; and, to begin with, I take 
 into consideration the fact that an event is generally 
 spoken of by philosophers as a passion as regards 
 the subject to which it happens, and an action in re- 
 spect to that which causes it ; so that, although the 
 agent and the patient may often be very different, 
 
 * CEuvres, t. iv, p. 37, seq. 
 291
 
 292 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PARTY 
 
 action and passion are always one and the same 
 thing, which has these two names because of the two 
 different subjects to which it can be referred. 
 
 ARTICLE II. 
 
 In order to understand the passions of the soul, it is 
 necessary to distinguish its functions from those of the 
 body. 
 
 Next I take into consideration that we know of no 
 subject which acts more immediately upon our soul 
 than the body to which it is joined, and that con- 
 sequently we must think that what in the one is a pas- 
 sion is commonly in the other an action ; so that 
 there is no better path to the knowledge of our pas- 
 sions than to examine into the difference between the 
 soul and the body, in order to know to which of them 
 is to be attributed each of our functions. 
 
 ARTICLE III. 
 
 The rule to be observed to this end. 
 
 No great difficulty will be found in this, if it be 
 borne in mind that all that which we experience in 
 ourselves which we see can also take place in bodies 
 entirely inanimate is to be attributed only to our 
 body ; and, on the contrary, all that which is in us 
 and which we cannot conceive in any manner possible 
 to pertain to a body is to be attributed to our soul.* 
 
 *"This utter disanimation of Body and its, not opposition, but 
 contrariety, sicuti omnino heterogeneum, to soul, as the assumed 
 Basis of Thought and Will ; this substitution, I say, of a merely 
 logical negatio alterius in otnni et singulo, for a philosophic an- 
 tithesis necessary to the manifestation of the identity of both 
 2=1 as the only form in which the human understanding can re-
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 293 
 
 ARTICLE IV. 
 
 Thai heat and the movement of the limbs proceed 
 from the body, thoughts from the mind. 
 
 Thus, because we cannot conceive that the body 
 thinks in any manner whatever, we have no reason 
 but to think that all forms of thought which are in us 
 belong to the mind ; and because we cannot doubt 
 that there are inanimate bodies which can move in as 
 many or more different ways than ours, and which 
 have as much or more heat (as experience teaches us 
 in the case of flame, which alone has more heat and 
 motion than any of our members), we must believe 
 that all the heat and all the motions which are in us, 
 in so far as they do not depend at all on thought, be- 
 long only to the body. 
 
 ARTICLE V. 
 
 That it is an error to think that the soul imparts motion 
 and heat to the body. 
 
 By this means we shall avoid a very great error, 
 into which many have fallen, an error which I con- 
 sider to be the principal hindrance, up to the present 
 time, to a correct explanation of the passions and other 
 properties of the soul. It consists in this, that, seeing 
 that all dead bodies are deprived of heat and, conse- 
 quently, of motion, it is imagined that the absence of 
 the soul causes these movements and this heat to 
 cease ; and thus it has been thought, without reason, 
 
 present to itself the 1=2, isthepfccatuw originalt of the Cartesian 
 system. " 
 
 Marginal jotting by Coleridge in a copy of Descartes' Opera 
 Philosophica, once owned by him, and now in the library of the 
 University of Vermont.
 
 294 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 that our natural heat and all the motions of our body 
 depend upon the soul ; instead of which it should be 
 thought, on the contrary, that soul departs, when 
 death occurs, only because this heat fails and the 
 organs which serve to move the body decay. 
 
 ARTICLE VI. 
 
 The difference between a living and a dead body. 
 
 In order, then, that we may avoid this error, let us 
 consider that death never takes place through the ab- 
 sence of a soul, but solely because some one of the 
 principal parts of the body has fallen into decay ; and 
 let us conclude that the body of a living man differs 
 as much from that of a dead man as does a watch or 
 other automaton (that is to say, or other machine 
 which moves of itself), when it is wound up, and has 
 within itself the material principle of the movements 
 for which it is constructed, with all that is necessary 
 for its action, from the same watch or other machine, 
 when it has been broken, and the principle of its 
 movement ceases to act. 
 
 ARTICLE VII. 
 
 Brief explanation of the parts of the body and of some 
 of its functions* 
 
 In order to render this more intelligible, I will ex- 
 plain here in a few words how the entire mechanism 
 of our body is composed. There is no one who does 
 not already know that there is in us a heart, a brain, 
 a stomach, muscles, nerves, arteries, veins, and such 
 things ; it is known also that the food we eat descends 
 
 * Cf. Discourse on Method, pt. v. (CEtwres, t. i, p. 173); Veitch, 
 p. 46.
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 295 
 
 into the stomach and the bowels, where their juices, 
 flowing through the liver and through all the veins, mix 
 themselves with the blood they contain, and by this 
 means increase its quantity. Those who have heard the 
 least talk in medicine know, further, how the heart is 
 constructed, and how all the blood of the veins can 
 easily flow through the vena cava on its right side, 
 and thence pass into the lung, by the vessel which is 
 called the arterial vein, then return from the lung on 
 the left side of the heart, by the vessel called the 
 venous artery, and finally pass thence into the great 
 artery, the branches of which are diffused through the 
 whole body. Also, all those whom the authority of 
 the ancients has not entirely blinded, and who are 
 willing to open their eyes to examine the opinion 
 of Hervoeus * in regard to the circulation of the blood, 
 have no doubt whatever that all the veins and arteries 
 of the body are merely channels through which the 
 blood flows without cessation and very rapidly, start- 
 ing from the right cavity of the heart by the arterial 
 vein, the branches of which are dispersed throughout 
 the lungs and joined to that of the venous artery, by 
 which it passes from the lungs into the left side of the 
 heart ; next, from thence it passes into the great 
 artery, the branches of which, scattered throughout 
 all the rest, of the body, are joined to the branches of 
 the vein, which carry once more the same blood into 
 the right cavity of the heart ; so that these two 
 cavities are like sluices, through each of which all the 
 blood passes every time it makes the circuit of the 
 body. Still further, it is known that all the move- 
 ments of the limbs depend upon the muscles, and that 
 these muscles are opposed to one another in such a 
 * Harvey. See tribute to Harvey, CEuvres, t. ix, p. 361.
 
 296 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 way that, when one of them contracts, it draws toward 
 itself the part of the body to which it is attached, 
 which at the same time stretches out the muscle which 
 is opposed to it ; then, if it happens, at another time, 
 that this last contracts, it causes the first to lengthen, 
 and draws toward itself the part to which they are 
 attached. Finally, it is known that all these move- 
 ments of the muscles, as also all the senses, depend 
 upon the nerves, which are like minute threads, or 
 small tubes, all of which come from the brain, and 
 contain, like that, a certain subtle air or breath, which 
 is called the animal spirits. 
 
 ARTICLE VIII. 
 
 The principle of all these functions. 
 
 But it is not commonly known in what manner 
 these animal spirits and these nerves contribute to 
 the movements of the limbs and to the senses, nor 
 what is the corporeal principle which makes them 
 act ; it is for this reason, although I have already 
 touched upon this matter in other writings,* I shall not 
 omit to say here briefly, that, as long as we live, there 
 is a continual heat in our heart, which is a kind of 
 fire kept up there by the blood of the veins, and that 
 this fire is the corporeal principle of the movements of 
 our limbs 
 
 ARTICLE XVI. 
 
 How all the limbs can be moved by the objects of the 
 senses and by the spirits without the aid of the soul. 
 
 Finally, it is to be observed that the machine of 
 our body is so constructed that all the changes which 
 
 * On Man, see above p. 280; also Discourse, etc.; Veitch, p. 52.
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 297 
 
 occur in the motion of the spirits may cause them to 
 open certain pores of the brain rather than others, 
 and, reciprocally, that when any one of these pores is 
 opened in the least degree more or less than is usual 
 by the action of the nerves which serve the senses, 
 this changes somewhat the motion of the spirits, 
 and causes them to be conducted into the mus- 
 cles which serve to move the body in the way 
 in which it is commonly moved on occasion of such 
 action ; so that all the movements which we make 
 without our will contributing thereto (as frequently 
 happens when we breathe, or walk, or eat, and, in fine, 
 perform all those actions which are common to us and 
 the brutes) depend only on the conformation of our 
 limbs and the course which the spirits, excited by the 
 heat of the heart, naturally follow in the brain, in the 
 nerves, and in the muscles, in the same way that the 
 movement of a watch is produced by the force solely 
 of its mainspring and the form of its wheels.* .... 
 
 ARTICLE XXX. 
 
 That the soul is united to all parts of the body con- 
 jointly. 
 
 But, in order to understand all these things more 
 perfectly, it is necessary to know that the soul is truly 
 joined to the entire body, and that it cannot properly 
 be said to be in any one of its parts to the exclusion 
 of the rest, because the body is one, and in a manner 
 
 * " Can the Bruckers and the German Manualists have read this 
 work of Descartes which yet was his most popular treatise that 
 they should (one, I guess, copying from the other) talk of Spi- 
 noza's having given Leibnitz the hint of his pre-established Har- 
 mony ? What is this XVIth Article, if not a clear and distinct 
 statement of this theory ?" Marginal note by Coleridge.
 
 298 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 indivisible, on account of the arrangement of its 
 organs, which are so related to one another, that when 
 any one of them is taken away, that makes the whole 
 body defective : and because the soul is of a nature 
 which has no relation to extension, or to dimensions, 
 or other properties of the matter of which the body is 
 composed, but solely to the whole collection of its 
 organs, as appears from the fact that we cannot at all 
 conceive of the half or the third of a soul, nor what 
 space it occupies, and that it does not become any 
 smaller when any part of the body is cut off, but that 
 it separates itself entirely from it when the combina- 
 tion of its organs is broken up. 
 
 ARTICLE XXXI. 
 
 That there is a small gland in the brain in which 
 the soul exercises its functions more particularly than 
 in the other parts. 
 
 It is, also, necessary to know that, although the soul 
 is joined to the entire body, there is, nevertheless, a 
 certain part of the body in which it exercises its func- 
 tions more particularly than in all the rest ; and it is 
 commonly thought that this part is the brain, or, per- 
 haps, the heart : the brain, because to it the organs of 
 sense are related ; and the heart, because it is as if 
 there the passions are felt. But, after careful exami- 
 nation, it seems to me quite evident that the part of 
 the body in which the soul immediately exercises its 
 functions is neither the heart, nor even the brain as a 
 whole, but solely the most interior part of it, which is 
 a certain very small gland, situated in the middle of its 
 substance, and so suspended above the passage by 
 which the spirits of its anterior cavities communicate 
 with those of the posterior/that the slightest motions 
 in it may greatly affect the course of these spirits,
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 299 
 
 and, reciprocally, that the slightest changes which 
 take place in the course of the spirits may greatly 
 affect the motions of this gland. 
 
 ARTICLE XXXII. 
 
 How this gland is known to be the principal seat of 
 the soul. 
 
 The reason which convinces me that the soul can- 
 not have in the whole body any other place than this 
 gland where it exercises its functions immediately, is 
 the consideration that the other parts of our brain are 
 all double, just as also we have two eyes, two hands, 
 two ears, and, in fine, all the organs of our external 
 senses are double ; and inasmuch as we have but 
 one single and simple thought of the same thing at the 
 same time, there must necessarily be some place where 
 the two images which by means of the two eyes, or 
 the two other impressions which come from a single 
 object by means of the double organs of the other 
 senses, may unite in one before they reach the mind, 
 in order that they may not present to it two objects in 
 place of one ; and it may easily be conceived that 
 these images or other impressions unite in this 
 gland, through the medium of the spirits which fill 
 the cavities of the brain ; but there is no other place 
 whatever in the whole body, where they can thus be 
 united, except as they have first been united in this 
 
 gland. 
 
 {Letter to Mersenne, July 30, 1640.* 
 
 As for the letter of the physician De Sens, it con- 
 tains no argument to impugn what I have written upon 
 the gland called conarium, except that he says that it 
 can be changed like all the brain, which does not at 
 all prevent its being the principal seat of the soul ; 
 
 *CEuvres, t. viii, p. 301.
 
 300 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 for it is certain that the soul must be joined to some 
 part of the body, and there is no point which is not as 
 much or more liable to alteration than this gland, 
 which, although it is very small and very soft, 
 nevertheless, on account of its situation, is so well 
 protected, that it can be almost as little subject to 
 any disease as the crystalline humor of the eye ; 
 and it happens more frequently indeed that persons 
 become troubled in mind, without any known cause, 
 in which case it may be assigned to some disorder of 
 this gland, than it happens that sight fails by any de- 
 fect of this crystalline humor, besides that all the 
 other changes which happen to the mind, as when one 
 falls asleep after drinking, etc., may be ascribed to 
 some changes occurring in this gland. 
 
 As for what he says about the mind's being able to 
 make use of double organs, I agree with him, and that 
 it makes use also of the spirits, all of which cannot 
 reside in this gland ; but I do not at all conceive that 
 the mind is so restricted to it that it cannot extend 
 its activity beyond it ; but it is one thing to make use 
 of, and another thing to be immediately joined and 
 united to it ; and our mind not being double, but 
 one and indivisible, it seems to me that the part of the 
 body to which it is most immediately united must 
 also be one and not divided into two similar parts, 
 and I find nothing of that kind in the whole brain 
 except this gland.* 
 
 * It is needless to say that modern physiology fails to confirm 
 the view of Descartes concerning the pineal gland as the seat of 
 the soul. " Its nervous nature is doubtful, and its function in man 
 obscure or absent, but it is constant among vertebrates, and in sev- 
 eral, especially lizards, it is connected with a more or less rudi- 
 mentary eye in the middle of the top of the head." Foster's 
 Medical Dictionary, p. 1724.]
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 301 
 
 ARTICLE XXXIII. 
 
 That the seat of the passions is not in the heart. 
 
 As for the opinion of those who think that the soul 
 experiences its passions in the heart, it is of no great 
 account, because it is founded only on the fact that 
 the passions cause some stir to be felt there ; and it 
 is easy to see that this change is felt, as if in the 
 heart, only through the medium of a small nerve, 
 which descends to it from the brain, just as pain is 
 felt as if in the foot through the medium of the nerves 
 of the foot, and the stars are perceived as in the 
 heavens by the medium of their light and the optic 
 nerves ; so that it is no more necessary that our soul 
 exercise its functions immediately in the heart in 
 order to feel there its passions, than it is necessary 
 that it should be in the heavens in order to see the 
 stars there. 
 
 ARTICLE XXXIV. 
 
 How the soul and the body act one upon the other. 
 
 Let us conceive, then, that the soul has its principal 
 seat in this little gland in the middle of the brain, 
 whence it radiates to all the rest of the body by 
 means of the spirits, the nerves, and even of the blood, 
 which, participating in the impressions of the mind, 
 can carry them by means of the arteries into all the 
 members ; and, bearing in mind what has been said 
 above concerning the machine of our body, to wit, 
 that the minute filaments of our nerves are so dis- 
 tributed throughout all its parts that, on occasion of 
 the different motions which are excited there by 
 means of sensible objects, they open in divers manners 
 the pores of the brain, which causes the animal spirits 
 contained in these cavities to enter in various ways
 
 302 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 into the muscles, by means of which they can move 
 the limbs in all the different ways of which they are 
 capable, and, also, that all the other causes, which in 
 other ways can set the spirits in motion, have the 
 effect to turn them upon various muscles [keeping 
 all this in mind], let us add here that the little gland 
 which is the principal seat of the soul is so suspended 
 between the cavities which contain the spirits, that it 
 can be affected by them in all the different ways that 
 there are sensible differences in objects ; but that it 
 can also be variously affected by the soul, which is of 
 such a nature that it receives as many different im- 
 pressions that is to say, that it has as many different 
 perceptions as there occur different motions in this 
 gland ; as also, reciprocally, the machine of the body 
 is so composed that from the simple fact that this 
 gland is variously affected by the soul, or by what- 
 ever other cause, it impels the spirits which surround 
 it toward the pores of the brain, which discharge 
 them by means of the nerves upon the muscles, 
 whereby it causes them to move the limbs 
 
 ARTICLE XL. 
 
 The principal effect of the passions. 
 
 It is to be noted that the principal effect of all the 
 passions in man is that they incite and dispose the 
 mind to will the things to which they prepare the 
 body, so that the sentiment of fear incites it to will to 
 fly ; that of courage, to will to fight ; and so of the rest. 
 
 ARTICLE XLI. 
 
 The power of the mind over the body. 
 But the will is so free in its nature that it can 
 never be constrained ; and of the two kinds of
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 303 
 
 thoughts which I have distinguished in the mind of 
 which one is its actions, that is, its volitions ; the 
 other its passions, taking this word in its most general 
 signification, comprehending all sorts of perceptions 
 the first of these are absolutely in its power, and can 
 be changed only indirectly by the body, while, on the 
 contrary, the last depend absolutely on the movements 
 which give rise to them, and they can be affected 
 only indirectly by the mind, except when it is itself 
 the cause of them. And the whole action of the 
 mind consists in this, that by the simple fact of its 
 willing anything it causes the little gland, to which it 
 is closely joined, to produce the result appropriate to 
 the volition. 
 
 ARTICLE XLII. 
 
 How the things we wish to recall are found in the 
 memory. 
 
 Thus, when the mind wills to recall anything, this 
 volition causes the gland, by inclining successively to 
 different sides, to impel the spirits toward different 
 parts of the brain, until they come upon that where 
 the traces are left of the thing it wills to remember ; 
 for these traces are due to nothing else than the 
 circumstance that the pores of the brain, through 
 which the spirits have already taken their course, on 
 presentation of that object, have thereby acquired a 
 greater facility than the rest to be opened again in 
 the same way by the spirits which come to them ; so 
 that these spirits coming upon these pores, enter 
 therein more readily than into the others, by which 
 means they excite a particular motion in the gland, 
 which represents to the mind the same object, and 
 causes it to recognize that it is that which it willed to 
 remember.
 
 304 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PARTY 
 
 ARTICLE XLIII. 
 
 How the mind can imagine, attend, and move the body. 
 
 Thus, when it is desired to imagine something 
 which has never been seen, the will has the power to 
 cause the gland to move in the manner requisite to 
 impel the spirits toward the pores of the brain by the 
 opening of which that thing can be represented ; so, 
 when one wills to keep his attention fixed for some 
 time upon the same object, this volition keeps the 
 gland inclined during that time in the same direc- 
 tion ; so, finally, when one wills to walk or to move his 
 body in any way, this volition causes the gland to 
 impel the spirits toward the muscles which serve that 
 purpose. 
 
 ARTICLE XLIV. 
 
 That each volition is naturally connected with some 
 motion of the gland, but that, by intention or by habit, 
 the will may be connected with others. 
 
 Nevertheless, it is not always the volition to excite 
 within us a certain motion, or other effect, which is 
 the cause of its being excited ; but this varies accord- 
 ing as nature or habit has 'variously united each 
 motion of the gland to each thought. Thus, for ex- 
 ample, if one desires to adjust his eyes to look at a 
 very distant object, this volition causes the pupil of 
 the eye to expand, and if he desires to adjust them so 
 as to see an object very near, this volition makes it 
 contract ; but if he simply thinks of expanding the 
 pupil, he wills in vain the pupil will not expand for 
 that, inasmuch as nature has not connected the mo- 
 tion of the gland, which serves to impel the spirits 
 toward the optic nerve in the manner requisite for 
 expanding or contracting the pupil, with the volition
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 305 
 
 to expand or contract, but with that of looking at 
 objects distant or near. And when, in talking, we 
 think only of the meaning of what we wish to say, 
 that makes us move the tongue and lips much more 
 rapidly and better than if we thought to move them 
 in all ways requisite for the utterance of the same 
 words, inasmuch as the habit we have acquired in 
 learning to talk has made us join the action of the 
 mind which, through the medium of the gland, can 
 move the tongue and the lips with the meaning of 
 the words which follow these motions rather than 
 with the motions themselves 
 
 ARTICLE XLVII. 
 
 Wherein consist the conflicts which are imagined to 
 exist between the inferior and the superior parts of the 
 soul. 
 
 It is only in the opposition between the motions that 
 the body through the spirits, and the soul through the 
 will, tend to excite at the same time in the gland, 
 that all the conflicts consist which are commonly im- 
 agined to arise between the inferior part of the soul, 
 which is called sensitive, and the superior part, which 
 is rational, or rather between the natural appetites and 
 the will ; for there is but one soul within us, and that 
 soul has in it no diversity of parts whatever ; the 
 same which is sensitive is rational, and all its appe- 
 tites are volitions. The error which is committed 
 in making it play the parts of different persons com- 
 monly opposed to each other arises only from the 
 want of a right distinction of its functions from those 
 of the body, to which is to be attributed all that which 
 may be observed within us to be hostile to our reason,
 
 306 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 so that there is in this no other conflict whatever, 
 except that the little gland which is in the middle of 
 the brain may be pushed on the one side by the soul 
 and on the other by the animal spirits, which are only 
 corporeal, as I have said above, and it often happens 
 that these two impulses are contrary, and the stronger 
 hinders the effect of the other. Now there may be 
 distinguished two kinds of motion excited by the 
 spirits in the gland ; the one represents to the soul 
 the objects which move the senses, or the impressions 
 which meet in the brain, and produce no effect upon 
 the will ; the other kind is those which produce some 
 effect upon it, namely, those which cause the passions 
 or the movements of the body which accompany 
 them ; and as for the first, although they often hinder 
 the actions of the soul, or perhaps may be hindered 
 by them, nevertheless, because they are not directly 
 opposed, no conflict is observed
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 307 
 
 PART II. 
 ARTICLE LI. 
 
 The primary causes of the passions. 
 
 IT is understood, from what has been said above, that 
 the last and proximate cause of the passions of the 
 soul is nothing but the motion imparted by the spirits 
 to the little gland in the middle of the brain. But this 
 is not enough to enable us to distinguish them from 
 one another ; it is necessary to trace them to their 
 sources and to inquire into their primary causes ; now, 
 although they may sometimes be caused by the action 
 of the mind, which determines to think upon such or 
 such objects, and also by the mere bodily tempera- 
 ment or by the impressions which happen to present 
 themselves in the brain, as occurs when one feels sad 
 or joyous without being able to assign any reason for 
 it, it should appear, nevertheless, according to what 
 has been said, that the same passions may all be ex- 
 cited by objects which move the senses, and that 
 these objects are their most ordinary and principal 
 causes ; whence it follows that, to discover them all, 
 it is sufficient to consider all the effects of these 
 objects. 
 
 ARTICLE LII. 
 
 What service they render, and how their number may 
 be determined. 
 
 I observe, further, that the objects which move the 
 senses do not excite in us different passions by reason 
 of all the diversities which are in them, but solely on
 
 308 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 account of the different ways in which they can injure 
 or profit us, or, in general, be important to us ; and 
 that the service which all the passions render consists 
 in this alone, that they dispose the mind to choose 
 the things which nature teaches us are useful, and to 
 persist in this choice, while also the same motion of 
 the spirits which commonly causes them disposes the 
 body to the movements which serve to the perform- 
 ance of those things ; this is why, in order to deter- 
 mine the number of the passions, it is necessary 
 merely to inquire, in due order, how many different 
 ways important to us there are in which our senses 
 can be moved by their objects ; and I shall here make 
 the enumeration of all the principal passions in the 
 order in which they may thus be found. 
 
 ARTICLE LIII. 
 Wonder. 
 
 When on first meeting an object we are surprised, 
 and judge it to be novel, or very different from what 
 we knew it before, or from what we supposed it should 
 be, this causes us to wonder at it and be astonished ; 
 and since this may happen before we could know 
 whether this object was beneficial to us or not, it seems 
 to me that wonder is the first of all the passions ; and 
 it has no contrary, because, if the object which pre- 
 sents itself has nothing in it which surprises us, we 
 are not at all moved by it, and we regard it without 
 emotion. 
 
 ARTICLE LXVIII. 
 
 Why this enumeration of the passions differs from 
 that commonly received. 
 
 Such is the order which seems to me the best in 
 enumerating the passions, I know very well that in
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 309 
 
 this my position is different from that of all who have 
 hitherto written upon them, but it is so not without 
 important reason. For they derive their enumeration 
 from their distinction in the sensitive part of the soul 
 of two appetites, one of which they call eoncupisdble, 
 the other irascible* And, inasmuch as I recognize in 
 the soul no distinction of parts, as I have said above, 
 this seems to me to signify nothing else but that it has 
 two faculties : one of desiring, the other of being 
 angry ; and because it has in the same way the facul- 
 ties of admiring, of loving, of hoping, of fearing, and 
 of entertaining each of the other passions, or of per- 
 forming the actions to which these passions incline it, 
 I do not see why they have chosen to refer all to de- 
 sire or to anger. Moreover, their enumeration does 
 not include all the principal passions, as I believe this 
 does. I speak only of the principal ones, because 
 there may still be distinguished many other more 
 special ones, and their number is indefinite. 
 
 ARTICLE LXIX. 
 That there are only six primary passions. 
 
 But the number of those which are simple and 
 primary is not very great. For, on reviewing all those 
 which I have enumerated, it is readily observed that 
 there are only six of this sort ; to wit, wonder, love, 
 hate, desire, joy, and sadness, and that all the rest are 
 made up of some of these six, or at least are species 
 of them. This is why, in order that their number 
 may not embarrass my readers, I shall here treat 
 separately of the six primaries ; and afterward I 
 shall show how all the rest derive their origin from 
 these. 
 
 * Plato, Republic, bk. iv.
 
 310 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 ARTICLE LXXIV. 
 
 In what respect the passions are of service and in what 
 they are harmful. 
 
 Now it is easy to see, from what has been said 
 above, that the usefulness of all the passions consists 
 only in this, that they strengthen and make enduring 
 in the mind the thoughts which it is well for it to 
 keep, and which but for that might easily be effaced 
 from it. As, also, all the evil they can cause consists 
 in their strengthening and preserving those thoughts 
 in the mind more than there is any need of, or else 
 that they strengthen and preserve others which it is 
 not well for the mind to attend to. 
 
 ARTICLE LXXIX. 
 
 Definitions of love and hatred. 
 
 Love is an emotion of the soul, caused by the mo- 
 tion of the spirits, which incites it to unite itself volun- 
 tarily to those objects which appear to it to be agree- 
 able. And hatred is an emotion, caused by the spirits, 
 which incites the mind to will to be separated from 
 objects which present themselves to it as harmful. I 
 say that these emotions are caused by the spirits, 
 in order to distinguish love and hatred, which are 
 passions, and depend upon the body, as well as the 
 judgments which also incline the mind to unite itself 
 voluntarily with the things which it regards as good, 
 and to separate itself from those which it regards as 
 evil, as the emotions which these judgments excite in 
 the soul. 
 
 ARTICLE LXXX. 
 
 What is meant by voluntary union and separation. 
 For the rest, by the word voluntarily, I do not here 
 intend desire, which is a passion by Itself, and relates
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 311 
 
 to the future, but the consent wherein one considers 
 himself for the moment as united with the beloved 
 object, conceiving as it were of one whole of which 
 he thinks himself but one part, and the object beloved 
 the other. While on the contrary, in the case of 
 hatred, one considers himself alone as a whole, 
 entirely separated from the object for which he has 
 aversion. 
 
 ARTICLE LXXXVI. 
 
 Definition of desire. 
 
 The passion of desire is an agitation of the soul, 
 caused by the spirits, which disposes it to wish for 
 the future the objects which it represents to itself to 
 be agreeable. Thus one desires not only the presence 
 of absent good, but also the preservation of the 
 present good, and, in addition, the absence of evil, 
 as well that which is already experienced, as that 
 which it is feared the future may bring. 
 
 ARTICLE XCI. 
 
 Definition of joy. 
 
 Joy is an agreeable emotion of the soul in which 
 the enjoyment consists which it has in any good that 
 the impressions of the brain represent to it as its own. 
 I say that it is in this emotion that the enjoyment of 
 good consists, for in reality the soul receives no other 
 fruit of all the goods it possesses ; and so long as it 
 has no joy in them, it may be said that it has no more 
 fruition of them than if it did not possess them at all. 
 I add, also, that it is of good which the impressions of 
 the brain represent to it as its own, in order not to 
 confound this joy, which is a passion, with the purely 
 intellectual joy, which arises in the mind by the simple
 
 312 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 activity of the mind, and which may be said to be an 
 agreeable emotion excited within itself, in which con- 
 sists the enjoyment which it has of the good which 
 its understanding represents to it as its own. It is 
 true that, so long as the mind is joined to the body, 
 this intellectual joy can scarcely fail to be accom- 
 panied with that joy which is passion ; for,"as soon as 
 our understanding perceives that we possess any good, 
 although that good may be as different as imaginable 
 from all that pertains to the body, the imagination 
 does not fail on the instant to make an impression on 
 the brain, upon which follows the motion of the spirits 
 which excites the passion of joy. 
 
 ARTICLE XCII. 
 
 Definition of sadness, 
 
 Sadness is a disagreeable languor, in which consists 
 the distress which the mind experiences from the evil 
 or the defect which the impressions of the brain 
 represent as pertaining to it. And there is also an 
 intellectual sadness, which is not the passion, but 
 which seldom fails to be accompanied by it. 
 
 ARTICLE XCVI. 
 
 The motions of the blood and the spirits which cause 
 these five passions. 
 
 The five passions which I have here begun to ex- 
 plain are so joined or opposed to one another, that it 
 is easier to consider them all together than to treat 
 of each separately (as wonder has been treated) ; 
 and the cause of them is not as is the case with 
 wonder, in the brain alone, but also in the heart, the 
 spleen, the liver, and in all other parts of the body, in
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 313 
 
 so far as they serve in the production of the blood, 
 and thereby of the spirits ; for although all the veins 
 conduct the blood they contain toward the heart, it 
 happens, nevertheless, that sometimes the blood in 
 some of them is impelled thither with more force than 
 that in others ; it happens, also, that the openings by 
 which it enters into the heart, or else those by which 
 it passes out, are more enlarged or more contracted 
 at one time than at another 
 
 ARTICLE CXXXVII. 
 
 Of the utility of these five passions here explained, in 
 so far as they relate to the body. 
 
 Having given the definitions of love, of hatred, of 
 desire, of joy, of sadness (and treated of all the cor- 
 poreal movements which cause or accompany them*) 
 we have only to consider here their utility. In regard 
 to which it is to be noted that, according to the ap- 
 pointment of nature, they all relate to the body, and 
 are bestowed upon the mind only in so far as it is 
 connected with it ; so that their natural use is to 
 incite the mind to consent and contribute to the 
 actions which may aid in the preservation of the body, 
 or render it in any way more perfect ; and, in this 
 sense, sadness and joy are the first two which are 
 employed. For the mind is immediately warned of 
 the things which harm the body only through the 
 sensation of pain, which produces in it first the pas- 
 sion of sadness ; next, hatred of that which causes this 
 pain ; and thirdly, the desire to be delivered from it ; 
 likewise the mind is made aware immediately of things 
 useful to the body only by some sort of pleasure, 
 
 * In the intervening Articles.
 
 314 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 which excites in it joy, then gives birth to love of that 
 which is believed to be the cause of it, and, finally, the 
 desire to acquire that which can make the joy con- 
 tinue, or else that the like may be enjoyed again. 
 Whence it is apparent that these five passions are all 
 very useful as regards the body, and also that sadness 
 is, in a certain way, first and more necessary than joy, 
 and hatred than love, because it is more important to 
 repel things which harm and may destroy us, than to 
 acquire those which add a perfection without which 
 we can still subsist. 
 
 ARTICLE CXLIV. 
 
 Of desires where the issue depends only on ourselves. 
 
 But because the passions can impel us to action 
 only through the medium of the desire which we 
 must take pains to regulate and in this consists the 
 principal use of morality ; now, as I have just said, as it 
 is always good when it follows a true knowledge, so it 
 cannot fail to be bad when it is based on error. And 
 it seems to me that the error most commonly com- 
 mitted in regard to desires is the failure to distinguish 
 sufficiently the things which depend entirely upon our- 
 selves and those which do not ; for, as for those which 
 depend only upon ourselves, that is to say, upon our 
 free will, it is sufficient to know that they are good to 
 make it impossible for us to desire them with too 
 great ardor, since to do the good things which depend 
 upon ourselves is to follow virtue, and it is certain 
 that one cannot have too ardent a desire for virtue, 
 and moreover, it being impossible for us to fail of 
 success in what we desire in this way, since it depends 
 on ourselves alone, we shall always attain all the
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 315 
 
 satisfaction that we have expected. But the most 
 common fault in this matter is not that too much, but 
 too little, is desired ; and the sovereign remedy 
 against that is to deliver the mind as much as possible 
 from all other less useful desires, then to try to under- 
 stand very clearly, and to consider attentively, the 
 excellence of that which is to be desired. 
 
 ARTICLE CXLV. 
 
 Of those which depend only on other things. 
 
 As for the things which depend in no wise upon 
 ourselves, however good they may be, they should 
 never be desired with passion ; not only because they 
 may not come to pass, and in that case we should be 
 so much the more cast down, as we have the more 
 desired them, but principally because by occupying 
 our thoughts they divert our interest from other 
 things the acquisition of which depends upon our- 
 selves. And there are two general remedies for these 
 vain desires ; the first is high-mindedness (la gene"r- 
 osite], of which I shall speak presently ; the second is 
 frequent meditation on Divine Providence, with the re- 
 flection that it is impossible that anything should hap- 
 pen in any other manner than has been determined 
 from all eternity by this Providence ; so that it is like 
 a destiny or an immutable necessity, which is to be 
 contrasted with chance in order to destroy it as a 
 chimera arising only from an error of our under- 
 standing. For we can desire only those things which 
 we regard as being in some way possible, and we do 
 not regard as possible things which do not at all de- 
 pend upon ourselves, except in so far as we think that 
 they depend on chance, that is to say, as we judge
 
 316 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 that they can happen, and that similar things have 
 happened before. Now this opinion is based only on 
 the fact that we do not know all the causes which have 
 contributed to each effect ; for when anything which 
 we have thought depended upon chance has not taken 
 place, this shows that some one of the causes neces- 
 sary to produce it was wanting, and, consequently, that 
 it was absolutely impossible, and the like of it never 
 took place ; that is to say, to the production of the 
 like a similar cause was also wanting, so that, had we 
 not been ignorant of that beforehand, we never 
 should have thought it possible, and consequently 
 should not have desired it. 
 
 ARTICLE CXLVI. 
 
 Of those things which depend upon ourselves and 
 others. 
 
 It is necessary then utterly to reject the common 
 opinion that there is externally to ourselves a chance 
 which causes things to happen or not to happen, at 
 its pleasure, and to know, on the other hand, that 
 everything is guided by Divine Providence, whose 
 eternal decree is so infallible and immutable, that, ex- 
 cepting the things which the same decree has willed 
 to depend upon our free choice, we must think that in 
 regard to us nothing happens which is not necessary, 
 and, as it were, destined, so that we cannot, without 
 folly, wish it to happen otherwise. But because most 
 of our desires extend to things, all of which do not 
 depend upon ourselves, nor all of them upon others, 
 we should distinguish precisely that in them which de- 
 pends only on ourselves in order to confine our de- 
 sires to that; and, moreover, although we should con-
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 317 
 
 sider success therein to be altogether a matter of im- 
 mutable destiny, in order that our desires may not be 
 taken up with it, we ought not to fail to consider the 
 reasons which make it more or less to be hoped for, to 
 the end that they may serve to regulate our conduct ; 
 as, for example, if we had business in a certain place 
 to which we might go by two different roads, one of 
 which was ordinarily much safer than the other, al- 
 though perhaps the decree of Providence was such 
 that if we went by the road considered safest we 
 should certainly be robbed, and that, on the contrary, 
 we might travel the other with no danger at all, we 
 ought not on that account to be indifferent in choos- 
 ing between them, nor rest on the immutable destiny 
 of that decree ; but reason would have it that we 
 should choose the road which was ordinarily consid- 
 ered the safer, and our desire should be satisfied re- 
 garding that when we have followed it, whatever be 
 the evil that happens to us, because that evil, being as 
 regards ourselves inevitable, we have had no reason 
 to desire to be exempt from it, but simply to do the 
 very best that our understanding is able to discover, 
 as I assume we have done. And it is certain that 
 when one thus makes a practice of distinguishing 
 destiny from chance, he easily accustoms himself so to 
 regulate his desires that, in so far as their accomplish- 
 ment depends only upon himself, they may always 
 afford him entire satisfaction. 
 
 ARTICLE CXLVII. 
 
 Of the interior emotions of the mind. 
 I will simply add a consideration which appears to 
 me of much service in averting from us the disturb-
 
 318 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [P A RT V 
 
 ance of the passions : it is that our good and our evil 
 principally depend upon the interior emotions, which 
 are excited in the mind only by the mind itself, in 
 which respect they differ from its passions, which al- 
 ways depend upon some motion of the spirits ; and 
 although these emotions of the mind are often united 
 with the passions which resemble them, they may 
 often also agree with others, and even arise from those 
 
 which are contrary to them And when we 
 
 read of strange adventures in a book, or see them rep- 
 resented on the stage, this excites in us sometimes 
 sadness, sometimes joy, or love, or hatred, and, in gen- 
 eral, all the passions, according to the diversity of 
 the objects which present themselves to our imagina- 
 tion ; but along with that we have the pleasure of feel- 
 ing them excited within us, and this pleasure is an in- 
 tellectual joy, which can arise from sadness as well as 
 from any other passion.* 
 
 ARTICLE CXLVIII. 
 
 That the practice of virtue is a sovereign remedy for 
 all the passions. 
 
 Now, inasmuch as these interior emotions touch us 
 more nearly, and in consequence have much greater 
 power over us than the passions from which they 
 differ, which occur with them, it is certain that, pro- 
 vided the mind have that within wherewith it may be 
 content, all the troubles which come from elsewhere 
 have no power whatever to disturb it, but rather serve 
 to augment its joy, in that, seeing that it cannot be 
 troubled by them, it is thereby made aware of its own 
 superiority. And to the end that the mind may have 
 that wherewith to be content, it needs but to follow 
 
 * Cf. Aristotle, Poetics, 6.
 
 PSYCHOLOGY! PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 319 
 
 virtue perfectly. For whoever has lived in such a 
 manner that his conscience cannot reproach him with 
 ever having failed to do any of those things which he 
 has judged to be the best (which is what I call here 
 following virtue), he enjoys a satisfaction so potent in 
 ministering to his happiness, that the most violent 
 efforts of the passions never have power enough to 
 disturb the tranquillity of his mind.
 
 320 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 PART III. 
 
 ARTICLE CXLIX. 
 
 Of esteem and contempt. 
 
 HAVING explained the six primitive passions, which 
 are, as it were, genera, of which all the rest are spe- 
 cies, I will here notice briefly what special ones there 
 are in each of the others, and will observe the same 
 order in accordance with which I have enumerated 
 them above. The first two are esteem and contempt ; 
 for, although these names ordinarily signify only the 
 opinion held, without passion, concerning the value of 
 anything, nevertheless, because from these opinions 
 there often arise passions to which no particular 
 names have been given, it seems to me that these may 
 be assigned to them. And esteem, in so far as it is a 
 passion, is an inclination which the mind has to rep- 
 resent to itself the value of the thing esteemed, 
 which inclination is caused by a particular motion of 
 the spirits, so converged into the brain as to strengthen 
 the impressions which relate to this subject ; while, 
 on the contrary, the passion of contempt is an inclina- 
 tion which the mind has to dwell upon the baseness 
 or littleness of that which it despises, caused by the 
 motion of the spirits which strengthens the idea of 
 this littleness. 
 
 ARTICLE CL. 
 Thus these two passions are only species of wonder.
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 321 
 
 ARTICLE CLI. 
 
 Now these two passions may, generally speaking, 
 relate to all sorts of objects ; but they are chiefly 
 worthy of attention when they relate to ourselves, that 
 is to say, when it is our own merit or demerit that we 
 judge of ; and the motion of the spirits which causes 
 them is then so manifest that it shows itself in the 
 whole bearing, the gestures, the walk, and, in general, 
 in all the actions of those who conceive a better or a 
 worse opinion of themselves than common. 
 
 ARTICLE CLII. 
 
 The ground of self-esteem. 
 
 And inasmuch as one chief part of wisdom is to 
 know in what degree and on what ground one ought 
 to esteem or contemn himself, I will now attempt to 
 state my opinion. I observe within ourselves but one 
 thing which can afford just ground for self-esteem, 
 namely, the use we make of our free-will, and the 
 control we have over our desires ; for it is only the 
 actions which depend upon this free-will for which we 
 may, with reason, be praised or blamed ; and it makes 
 us in a certain way like to Deity, by making us masters 
 of ourselves, provided we do not, by a base remiss- 
 ness, lose the rights which it confers. 
 
 ARTICLE CLIII. 
 
 In what high-mindedness consists. 
 
 Accordingly I think that true high-mindedness 
 (gentrosite), which makes a man esteem himself as 
 highly as it is legitimate for him to do, simply consists, 
 in part, in his being persuaded that there is nothing
 
 322 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PARTY 
 
 which truly belongs to him but this free control over 
 his desires, and that there is no reason why he should 
 be praised or blamed, except because he has used this 
 power well or ill ; and, in part, that he is conscious 
 within himself of a firm and steadfast determination 
 to use it well, that is to say, never to fail willingly to 
 undertake and to carry out all things which he shall 
 judge to be the best : which is to follow virtue per- 
 fectly. 
 
 ARTICLE CLIV. 
 
 That it keeps one from despising others. 
 
 Those who have this knowledge and sentiment con- 
 cerning themselves are easily persuaded that any 
 other man may have it also of himself, because there 
 is nothing in it which depends on other persons. It 
 is for this reason that they never despise anyone ; 
 and although they see that others commit faults which 
 betray their weakness, they are nevertheless more in- 
 clined to excuse than to blame them, and to believe 
 that it is more from want of knowledge than from 
 want of will that they have done these things ; and 
 while they do not think themselves much inferior to 
 those who have greater possessions or honors, or even 
 to those who have more intellect, more learning, more 
 beauty, or, in general, who surpass them in any other 
 perfections, so, on the other hand, they do not esteem 
 themselves much above those whom they surpass, 
 because all these things appear to them quite incon- 
 siderable in comparison with the good will, for which 
 alone they esteem themselves, and which they assume 
 to be, or at least may possibly be, in every other 
 man.
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 323 
 
 ARTICLE CLV. 
 
 In what virtuous humility consists. 
 
 Thus the most high-minded are usually the most 
 humble ; and virtuous humility consists simply in 
 this, that reflecting on the infirmity of our nature and 
 upon the faults which we have committed in the past, 
 or are capable of committing, which are not less than 
 those of others, we do not prefer ourselves above any- 
 one else, mindful that others have free-will as well as 
 we, and may make as good use of it. 
 
 ARTICLE CLVI. 
 
 The characteristics of high- minded ness, arid how it 
 serves as a remedy for all the disorders of the passions. 
 
 Those who are high-minded, after this sort, are 
 naturally led to do great things, and yet not to attempt 
 anything of which they do not think themselves capa- 
 ble ; and because they do not esteem anything greater 
 than to do good to other men, and to think lightly of 
 their own advantage, for this reason they are always 
 perfectly courteous, affable, and obliging toward every- 
 one. And at the same time they have complete con- 
 trol of their passions, particularly of the desires, of 
 jealousy and envy, inasmuch as there is nothing the 
 acquisition of which does not depend on themselves, 
 that they think worth sighing for ; and they are able 
 to control the passion of hatred, because they think 
 well of all men ; and of fear, because the confidence 
 they have in their virtue gives them assurance ; and 
 finally, of anger, because, esteeming but lightly all 
 things which depend on others, they never give so 
 much advantage to their enemies as to show that they 
 have been offended
 
 324 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART V 
 
 ARTICLE CLXXXV. 
 
 Of pity. 
 
 Pity is a species of grief, mingled with love or good 
 will toward those whom we see suffering some evil 
 which we think they have not deserved. It is thus 
 contrary to envy, by virtue of its object, and to ridi- 
 cule, because it regards that object in a different 
 way. 
 
 ARTICLE CLXXXVI. 
 
 Who are the most compassionate. 
 
 Those who are keenly sensible of their infirmities, 
 and of their exposure to the adversities of fortune, 
 appear to be more inclined to this feeling than others, 
 because they represent the evil which happens to 
 another as something which might happen to them- 
 selves ; and they are thus moved to compassion rather 
 through the love which they bear themselves than that 
 they have for others. 
 
 ARTICLE CLXXXVII. 
 
 Hoiv the more generous are affected by this sentiment. 
 
 But, nevertheless, those who are more noble and who 
 have the greater fortitude, so that they fear no evil 
 for themselves, and thus place themselves beyond the 
 power of fortune, are not devoid of pity when they 
 look upon the infirmities of others and hear their com- 
 plaints ; for it is the mark of the noble mind to desire 
 the happiness of everyone. But the sadness of this 
 pity is not bitter, and, like that caused by the tragic 
 scenes which one witnesses in a theater, it is rather an 
 external affair and more a matter of the senses than
 
 PSYCHOLOGY] PASSIONS OF THE SOUL. 325 
 
 of the mind itself,* which, nevertheless, has the satis- 
 faction of thinking it has discharged its duty in that 
 it has sympathized with the afflicted. And there is 
 this difference, that whereas most people feel pity for 
 those who complain, because they think that the evils 
 they suffer are very serious, the principal object of 
 compassion on the part of greater minds, on the other 
 hand, is the weakness of those whom they see com- 
 plaining, because they consider that no adversity that 
 can possibly occur is so great an evil as the pusilla- 
 nimity of those who cannot endure it with constancy ; 
 and, although they abhor vices, they do not abhor 
 those whom they perceive to be subject to them, but 
 simply regard them with pity 
 
 ARTICLE CCXII. 
 
 That upon the passions alone depend all the good and 
 the evil of this life. 
 
 To conclude : The mind may indeed have its own 
 pleasures apart from the body, but as for those which 
 it has in common with the body, these depend entirely 
 
 * " Not always. A man of great fortitude and nobleness of 
 character may at the same time possess great constitutional sensi- 
 bility, with a lively imagination. Now the latter will represent to 
 him the distresses of another, whether known by verbal descrip- 
 tion, or by the usual signs and visual language of pain or grief, 
 with great vividness and distinctness of impression, and thus pro- 
 duce in his own passive life perhaps even more acute feelings and 
 stronger sentiments of grief than the actual sufferer's nature is sus- 
 ceptible of while he cannot take for granted an equal share of 
 fortitude with himself. He fancies himself suffering the distress 
 without the power of enduring it and apart from the alleviations 
 and compensations with which it would be accompanied in his own 
 instance and this may be a very painful sympathy. S. T. C." 
 Marginal jotting by Coleridge.
 
 326 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. 
 
 upon the passions, insomuch that the men whom they 
 can most deeply stir are capable of tasting most sen- 
 sibly the sweetness of this life, but it is true also they 
 may experience most keenly its bitterness, in case 
 they know not how to regulate them, or fortune be 
 contrary ; but in this very thing appears the principal 
 use of wisdom, that it teaches a man how to become 
 master of himself, and so skillfully to regulate his pas- 
 sions that the evils they cause shall be quite endur- 
 able, while from every one of them he shall extract its 
 due delight.
 
 ETHICS. 
 
 LETTERS ON THE HAPPY LIFE AND THE 
 HIGHEST GOOD.
 
 ON THE HAPPY LIFE.* 
 
 WHEN I decided upon Seneca's book De Vita 
 Beata to propose to your Highness as an agreeable 
 subject for correspondence, I had in mind merely the 
 reputation of the author and the importance of the 
 subject, without considering the treatment he had 
 given it, which, when I did consider afterward, I did 
 not find to be quite careful enough to deserve to be 
 followed. But in order that your Highness may the 
 more easily judge of it, I will endeavor to explain in 
 what manner it seems to me that this subject should 
 have been treated by a philosopher such as he was, 
 who, not being enlightened by faith, had only natural 
 reason for his guide. He says very well at the be- 
 ginning : Vivere omnes beate volunt, sed ad pervidendum 
 quid sit quod beatam vitam efficiat, caligant. But we 
 need to know what vivere beate is. I would say in 
 French vivre heureusement, if it were not that there is 
 a difference between I'heur and la latitude, namely, 
 that Vheur depends merely on things external to us, 
 whence it comes about that those are rather to be 
 esteemed fortunate than prudent (sages) to whom 
 some good happens which they have not themselves 
 procured, whereas la beatitude consists, as it seems to 
 me, in a perfect contentment of spirit and an interior 
 satisfaction which the most favored of Fortune do not 
 commonly have and which the virtuous (les sages) 
 acquire without her aid. Accordingly, vivere beate, 
 
 * Letters to the Princess Elisabeth, (Euvres, t. ix, pp. 210-249.
 
 33 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART VI 
 
 vivre en beatitude, is nothing else than to have the 
 mind perfectly content and satisfied. 
 
 Considering next what quod beatam vitam efficiat 
 means, that is to say, what the things are which are 
 able to yield us this supreme contentment, I observe 
 that they are of two kinds, namely, those which de- 
 pend upon ourselves, such as virtue and wisdom, and 
 those which do not depend upon ourselves, such as 
 honors, riches, and health ; for it is certain that a man 
 well-born, who is in health, and in want of nothing, 
 and who, besides that, is as wise and virtuous as 
 another man who is poor, sickly, and deformed, can 
 enjoy the more complete contentment. Still, as a 
 little vessel may be as full as a larger one, although 
 it hold less liquid, so, taking the contentment of each 
 to mean the fulfillment and satisfaction of his desires 
 regulated according to reason, I do not doubt that 
 the poorest and most disgraced of fortune or of 
 nature may be as entirely content and satisfied as 
 others, although they may not enjoy so many advan- 
 tages. And it is this sort of contentment only which 
 is here considered ; for since the other is in no wise 
 within our power, inquiry regarding it would be 
 superfluous. Now it seems to me that everyone has it 
 in his power to secure contentment from himself 
 alone, without seeking for it elsewhere, provided only 
 he will observe three things, to which relate the three 
 rules of conduct which I have laid down in the Dis- 
 course on Method.* 
 
 The first is that he always endeavor to use his 
 mind in the best way possible to him, to find out what 
 ought to be done or not to be done in all the occur- 
 rences of life. The second is that he maintain a firm 
 * (Euvres, t. i, pp. 146-153. See above, pp. 50-55.
 
 ETHICS] ON THE HAPPY LIFE. 331 
 
 and constant resolution to carry out everything which 
 his reason dictates, without being turned aside there- 
 from by his passions or his appetites ; and it is this 
 firmness of resolution which I believe should betaken 
 for virtue, although I am not aware that anyone 
 hitherto has so defined it ; but it has been divided 
 into many species, to which different names have been 
 given, in view to the different objects to which it 
 relates. 
 
 The third, that, while he is thus conducting his life 
 so far as possible in accordance with reason, he 
 consider all advantages which he does not possess as 
 being one and all entirely beyond his power, and that 
 he thus accustom himself not to desire them ; for 
 there is nothing but desire or regret or repentance 
 which can prevent us from being contented. But if 
 we always do as our reason dictates, we shall never 
 have any occasion for repentance, because, although 
 in the event we may see that we were deceived, it could 
 not be through our own fault. And the reason why 
 we do not desire to have, for example, more arms or 
 more tongues than we do, but desire rather to have more 
 health and more riches, is merely that we imagine that 
 these latter may be acquired by our effort, or perhaps 
 that they are due to our birth, and in the other case it 
 is not so. We ought to rid ourselves of this opinion, 
 by considering that, in case we have always followed 
 the dictates of our reason, we have omitted nothing of 
 that which was within our power, and that maladies 
 and misfortunes are no less natural to man than pros- 
 perity and health. 
 
 Finally, not every sort of desire is incompatible 
 with true happiness (la beatitude] but only those which 
 are accompanied with impatience and sadness. It is
 
 332 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART VI 
 
 not necessary, also, that our reason never deceive us; 
 it is enough that our conscience give its inward wit- 
 ness that we have never been wanting in the resolution 
 and the virtue to perform everything which we have 
 judged to be the best ; and thus virtue alone is suf- 
 ficient to make us contented in this life. 
 
 But nevertheless, inasmuch as our virtue, when it 
 is not sufficiently enlightened by the understanding, 
 may be false, that is to say, the resolution and the 
 will to do right may take us to things which are bad 
 when we believe them to be good, the contentment 
 which results from it is not secure ; and inasmuch as 
 this virtue is ordinarily opposed to pleasures, to appe- 
 tites, and to passions, it is very difficult to put in prac- 
 tice ; whereas the right use of reason, affording a true 
 knowledge of the good, prevents virtue from becoming 
 false ; and also, by bringing it into accord with lawful 
 pleasures, it renders the practice of it so easy, and, by 
 making us understand the limitations of our nature, so 
 limits our desires that it must be admitted that the 
 highest happiness of man depends on this right use of 
 reason, and consequently that the study which leads 
 to its acquisition is the most useful occupation in 
 which one can engage, as it is also, undoubtedly, the 
 most agreeable and pleasant. 
 
 Accordingly, it seems to me that Seneca should have 
 taught us all the principal truths the knowledge of 
 which is requisite to facilitate the practice of virtue 
 and to regulate our desires and our passions, and thus 
 to secure our natural happiness, which would have 
 made his book the best and the most useful that a 
 pagan philosopher could have written 
 
 . . . . I observe, in the first place, that there 
 is a difference between true happiness (la beatitude} t
 
 ETHICS] ON THE HAPPY LIFE. 333 
 
 the highest good, and the final aim or end to which 
 our actions should be directed ; for true happiness is 
 not the highest good, but it presupposes it, and is the 
 contentment or satisfaction of mind which results 
 from its possession. But by the end of our actions 
 we may understand both ; for the highest good is un- 
 doubtedly that which we ought to propose to ourselves 
 as the end in all our actions ; and the contentment of 
 mind which springs from it, being the attraction which 
 makes us seek it, is also with good reason called our 
 end. 
 
 I observe, further, that the word pleasure was taken 
 in a different sense by Epicurus from what it was by 
 those who disputed with him ; for all his opponents 
 restricted the meaning of this word to the pleasures 
 of the senses, while he, on the contrary, extended it 
 to all satisfactions of the mind, as may readily be 
 seen from what Seneca and others wrote about him. 
 
 Now there were three principal opinions held by 
 pagan philosophers touching the highest good and the 
 end of our actions : to wit, that of Epicurus, who 
 said it was pleasure ; that of Zeno, who decided it to 
 be virtue ; and that of Aristotle, who made it consist 
 of all the perfections as well of the body as of the 
 mind. These three opinions may, as it seems to me, 
 be taken as true and accordant with one another, pro- 
 vided they are favorably interpreted. For Aristotle, 
 having in view the highest good of our whole human 
 nature taken in general that is to say, that which the 
 most perfect of mankind may attain is right in mak- 
 ing it consist of all the perfections of which human 
 nature is capable ; but that does not serve our turn. 
 Zeno, on the other hand, took it to be what each man 
 in his own person may possess ; that is why he was
 
 334 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART VI 
 
 quite right in saying, also, that it consists only in virtue, 
 because it is that alone among all the goods we can 
 possess which depends entirely upon our free will. 
 But he represented this virtue as being so severe and 
 so opposed to pleasure, by making all vices equal, 
 that, as it seems to me, only melancholy persons, or 
 those whose minds were entirely detached from the 
 body, could have been his followers. 
 
 Finally, Epicurus was not wrong, when, considering 
 the nature of true happiness and the motive or end of 
 our actions, he said it was pleasure in general, that is 
 to say, contentment of mind ; for although the sim- 
 ple knowledge of our duty may oblige us to perform 
 good actions, that, nevertheless, would not cause us to 
 enjoy any happiness, if no pleasure came to us from 
 it. But inasmuch as the name pleasure is often at- 
 tributed to false delights, which are accompanied or 
 followed by disquietude, ennui, and repentance, many 
 persons have thought that this opinion of Epicurus 
 inculcated vice ; and, indeed, it does not inculcate 
 virtue. But just as when there is a prize offered for 
 shooting at a mark, those to whom the prize has been 
 shown have a desire to shoot, but yet cannot gain it if 
 they do not look at the mark ; and those who look 
 at the mark are not thereby induced to shoot at it, 
 unless they know that there is a prize to be gained ; 
 so virtue, which is the mark, does not excite desire 
 when seen by itself alone, and contentment, which is 
 the prize, cannot be gained, unless the virtue be 
 practiced. 
 
 This is why I think I may rightly conclude that 
 true happiness consists solely in contentment of mind 
 (that is to say, in contentment taken in general ; for 
 although there are forms of contentment which de-
 
 ETHICS] ON THE HAPPY LIFE. 335 
 
 pend upon the body, and others which do not depend 
 upon it, there, nevertheless, is none which does not 
 exist within the mind) ; but to have a contentment 
 which is secure, one must follow virtue, that is to say, 
 one must have a firm and constant will to perform all 
 that he judges to be the best, and employ the whole 
 force of his understanding to secure a right judgment. 
 .... But in order that we may know precisely 
 how much each thing may contribute to our content- 
 ment, the causes which produce it must be consid- 
 ered, and this is one of the main things to be known 
 to facilitate the practice of virtue. For all acts of the 
 soul which lead to the acquisition of any perfection are 
 virtuous, and our whole contentment consists only in 
 the interior witness that we have acquired some per- 
 fection. Accordingly, we never shall practice any 
 virtue, that is to say, do anything which our reason 
 persuades us we ought to do, without receiving there- 
 from satisfaction and pleasure. But there are two 
 kinds of pleasures, the one pertaining to the mind 
 alone, the other to man, that is to say, to the mind in 
 its union with the body ; and the latter, presenting 
 themselves confusedly to the imagination, often ap- 
 pear greater than they are, especially before they are 
 possessed which is the source of all the evils and of 
 all the errors of life. For, according to the rule of 
 reason, each pleasure should be measured by the 
 greatness of the perfection which produces it, and it is 
 thus that we measure those the causes of which are 
 clearly known by us ; but, frequently, passion makes 
 us believe certain things much better and more desir- 
 able than they are ; afterward, when we have taken 
 great trouble to acquire them and have lost mean- 
 while the opportunity to gain other things which are
 
 336 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART VI 
 
 really better, the enjoyment of them makes us aware 
 of their defects ; whence come disgust, regret, repent- 
 ance. Hence the office of reason is to examine into 
 the true value of all the goods the acquisition of which 
 depends in any manner upon our conduct, in order 
 that we may never fail to use all our diligence in the 
 endeavor to acquire for ourselves those which are in 
 reality the most desirable : in which, if fortune oppose 
 our designs and hinder our success, we shall at least 
 have the satisfaction of losing nothing through our 
 own fault, and we shall not fail of enjoying all the 
 natural happiness the acquisition of which was within 
 our power. Thus, for example, anger may excite in 
 us such violent desire for revenge as to lead us to 
 imagine more pleasure in punishing our enemy than in 
 preserving our honor or our life, and imprudently to 
 imperil both for this end. 
 
 Whereas, if reason inquire what is the good or per- 
 fection upon which is founded this pleasure which pro- 
 ceeds from revenge, it will find no other (at least 
 when the revenge does not serve merely to prevent a 
 fresh offense), than that it makes us imagine that we 
 have some superiority or some advantage over him upon 
 whom we take vengeance : which is often only a vain 
 imagination not worth considering in comparison with 
 honor or life ; nor even in comparison with the satis- 
 faction that one would have in seeing himself master 
 of his anger and in abstaining from revenge. And 
 the same is true of all the other passions : for there 
 is none of them which does not represent the good to 
 which it tends in brighter colors than it deserves, and 
 which does not make us imagine its delights far 
 greater, before we possess them, than we find them to 
 be afterward, when they are ours. This is why pleas-
 
 ETHICS] ON THE HAPPY LIFE. 337 
 
 ure is commonly condemned ; because this word is 
 used to signify false delights which often deceive us 
 by their appearance and cause us meanwhile to neg- 
 lect other far more substantial ones, the aspect of 
 which does not affect us so much, as is ordinarily the 
 case with purely intellectual pleasures ; I say ordi- 
 narily, for not all pleasures of the mind are praise- 
 worthy, since they may be founded on some false 
 opinion, as the pleasure which one may find in detrac- 
 tion, which is based solely on the notion that one must 
 be so much the more esteemed as others are less so ; 
 and they can also deceive us by their appearance, when 
 some strong passion accompanies them, as is seen in 
 one who yields to ambition. But the principal differ- 
 ence between the pleasures of the body and those of 
 the mind consists in the fact that the body being sub- 
 ject to perpetual change, and its very preservation and 
 its welfare being dependent on this change, all its 
 pleasures are of short duration ; for they proceed only 
 from the acquisition of something which is useful to 
 the body at the moment that it receives it, and as soon 
 as it ceases to be useful to it, the pleasure ceases also ; 
 whereas, those of the mind may be as immortal as it- 
 self, provided they have a foundation so solid that 
 neither knowledge of the truth, nor any false per- 
 suasion, may destroy it. 
 
 Finally, the true use of our reason for the conduct 
 of life consists simply in the examination and dispas- 
 sionate estimate of the value of all perfections, as 
 well those of the body as of the mind, which can be 
 acquired by our own effort, in order that, being com- 
 monly obliged to do without some in order to have 
 others, we may always choose the best ; and since 
 those of the body are the least, it can, in general, be
 
 338 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART VI 
 
 said that without them one has the means of making 
 himself happy. Still I am not of the opinion that 
 they should be entirely slighted, nor even that one 
 should be exempt from passions ; it is enough that 
 they be made amenable to reason, and when they 
 have thus been made tractable, they are often the 
 more useful in proportion as they incline to ex- 
 cess 
 
 .... There can be, I think, but two things requi- 
 site to our always being disposed to judge rightly ; 
 one is knowledge of the truth, the other the habit of 
 reminding one's self of this knowledge, and of con- 
 forming to it whenever occasion requires it. But 
 since it is God only who perfectly knows all things, 
 we must content ourselves with knowing those which 
 most nearly concern us ; among which is first and 
 chief that there is a God upon whom all things de- 
 pend, whose perfections are infinite, whose power is 
 unlimited, whose decrees are infallible ; for this 
 teaches us to receive in good part whatever happens 
 to us as being expressly sent to us from God. And 
 since the true object of love is perfection, when we 
 raise our minds to think of him as he truly is, we find 
 ourselves naturally so inclined to love him that we 
 extract joy even from our afflictions, when we think 
 that his will is being done in our receiving them. 
 
 The second thing to be known is the nature of the 
 soul, inasmuch as it exists without the body, and is 
 much more noble than it, and is capable of enjoying 
 an infinitude of pleasures which are not found in this 
 present life ; for this rids us of the fear of death, and 
 so detaches our affection from earthly things that we 
 look with mere disdain upon all that is within the 
 power of fortune.
 
 ETHICS] ON THE HAPPY LIFE. 339 
 
 It will also be of much advantage to us to take 
 worthy views of the works of God and entertain that 
 vast idea of the extent of the universe which I have 
 endeavored to unfold in the third book of my Prin- 
 ciples* For if we suppose that beyond the heavens 
 there is nothing but empty space (des espaces imagi- 
 naires), and that the whole heavens were made only 
 for the sake of the earth, and the earth only for man, 
 we are led to think that this earth is our principal 
 abode, and the present life our best ; and instead of 
 recognizing the perfections which we truly have, we 
 attribute to other creatures imperfections which they 
 have not, in order to exalt ourselves above them ; 
 and going on in our impertinent presumption, we 
 would enter into the counsels of Deity and undertake 
 with him the management of the world a source of 
 vain disquietude and vexation without end. 
 
 When we have thus taken into account the good- 
 ness of God, the immortality of our souls, and the 
 greatness of the universe, there is still one truth more, 
 the recognition of which seems to me to be very use- 
 ful, which is this, that although each one of us is a 
 person separate from others, whose interests, conse- 
 quently, are in some degree distinct from those of 
 the rest of the world, it must still be remembered that 
 one cannot exist alone, that he is in reality a part of 
 the universe, still more particularly a part of this 
 earth, a member of the state, the society, the family, 
 to which he is joined by his abode, his oath of allegiance, 
 his birth ; and he must always prefer the interests of 
 the whole of which he is a part to those of himself in 
 particular, yet with measure and discretion : for it 
 would be wrong for one to expose himself to a great 
 
 * (Euvres, t. iii, p. 180.
 
 340 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART VI 
 
 evil in order to secure a trifling advantage to his 
 family or his country ; and if a man is worth more, 
 himself alone, than all the rest of his town, he would 
 not be right, were he willing, to sacrifice himself to 
 save the town. 
 
 But if one refers everything to himself, he will not 
 shrink from doing considerable harm to other men, 
 when he thinks he may gain some small advantage 
 from it, and he will have no true friendship, nor fidel- 
 ity, nor any virtue at all ; whereas, by considering 
 himself a part of the public, one takes pleasure in 
 doing good to everybody, and even does not fear to 
 expose his life for the welfare of others when occa- 
 sion presents itself ; as one might be willing even to 
 lose his own soul, if it were possible, to save others : 
 so that this way of looking at things is the source and 
 origin of all the most heroic human actions. But as 
 for those who brave death through vanity, because 
 they hope to be applauded ; or from stupidity, because 
 they do not perceive the danger ; I think they are 
 rather to be lamented than approved. But when one 
 imperils his life because he believes it to be his duty, 
 or, indeed, when he suffers any other evil to the end 
 that some good may accrue to others, although he 
 may not do this with distinct recognition of the fact 
 that he owes more to the public of which he forms a 
 part than to himself as an individual, he nevertheless 
 may act from this consideration obscurely present to 
 his mind ; and one is naturally led to it, if he knows 
 and loves God as he ought ; for then, entirely sur- 
 rendering himself to his will, he divests himself of 
 his own individual interests, and has no other desire 
 than to do what he believes to be agreeable to the will 
 of God. Such an one experiences an inward satisfac-
 
 ETHICS] ON THE HAPPY LIFE. 341 
 
 tion and content worth incomparably more than all 
 
 the petty fleeting joys of sense 
 
 Finally, I said above that, besides knowledge of the 
 truth, habit is also necessary to make one disposed 
 always to decide correctly ; for inasmuch as we can- 
 not give our attention constantly to the same thing, 
 however clear and convincing may have been the rea- 
 sons which have hitherto persuaded us of any truth, 
 we may afterward be turned aside from our belief in 
 it by false appearances, unless by long and frequent 
 meditation we have so impressed it upon our minds 
 that it has become a habit ; and in this sense they are 
 right in the school in saying that virtues are habits ; 
 for in fact one does not fail in duty from the lack of a 
 theoretical knowledge of what he ought to do, but 
 from the want of a practical possession of it, that 
 is to say, from the want of a fixed habit of convic- 
 tion. .
 
 ON THE HIGHEST GOOD.* 
 
 I HAVE learned from M. Chanut that it pleases your 
 Majesty that I should have the honor of laying be- 
 fore you my views concerning the highest good, con- 
 sidered in the sense in which the ancient philosophers 
 discussed it ; and I esteem this command so great a 
 favor that the desire to obey it diverts my mind from 
 every other thought, and leads me, without deprecat- 
 ing my incompetency, to put down here in few words 
 all that I may know on this subject. One may con- 
 sider the goodness of each thing in itself without re- 
 lation to other things, in which sense it is evident that 
 God is the highest good, since he is incomparably 
 more perfect than the creatures ; but the good may 
 also be considered in respect to ourselves, and in this 
 sense I see nothing which we ought to esteem good 
 but that which may belong to us in some manner, and 
 be such as should render our possession of it a per- 
 fection. 
 
 Thus the ancient philosophers, who, unenlightened 
 by the faith, knew nothing of supernatural blessed- 
 ness, took into account only the goods we may possess 
 in this life, and it was among these that they asked 
 themselves what was the sovereign, that is to say, 
 the principal and the greatest good. But in order 
 that I may answer this question I hold that we ought 
 to esteem as goods in respect to ourselves those only 
 
 * Letter to Catherine, Queen of Sweden, (Evvres, t. x, pp. 
 59-04- 
 
 343
 
 ON THE HIGHEST GOOD. 343 
 
 which we possess, or rather those which we have the 
 power to acquire ; and this granted, it seems to me 
 that the highest good of mankind in general is the 
 sum or assemblage of all the goods, as well of the 
 mind as of the body and of fortune, which may exist 
 in any men ; but that the highest good of each one in 
 particular is quite another thing, and that it consists 
 simply in a steadfast will to do right, and in the sat- 
 isfaction which it produces ; the reason of which is 
 that I do not know of any other good which seems to 
 me so great, or which is so entirely within the power 
 of each person. For, as for the goods of the body and 
 of fortune, they do not depend absolutely upon our- 
 selves : but those of the mind all turn on two principal 
 ones, which are, the one, to know, the other, to will, 
 that which is good ; but the knowledge of the good is 
 often beyond our ability ; there remains, therefore, our 
 will alone, which we may absolutely control. And I 
 do not see that it is possible to make a better disposi- 
 tion of it, than for one to have always a fixed and stead- 
 fast determination scrupulously to perform everything 
 which he shall judge to be best, and to make use 
 of all the powers of his mind to discover it ; it is in 
 this alone that all the virtues consist ; it is this alone 
 which, properly speaking, merits praise and honor ; 
 finally, from this alone results the greatest and the 
 most solid satisfaction of life : accordingly, I conceive 
 that in this consists the highest good. 
 
 And by this means I think I can bring into accord- 
 ance the two most opposed and most celebrated theories 
 of the ancients, namely, that of Zeno, who placed it 
 in virtue or honor, and that of Epicurus, who placed 
 it in that form of gratification to which he gave the 
 name of pleasure. For as all vices proceed only from
 
 344 THE PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES. [PART VI 
 
 the uncertainty and the weakness which follows igno- 
 rance, of which the offspring is repentance ; so virtue 
 consists only in the resolution and the energy with 
 which one is borne on to the doing of things which 
 he thinks to be good ; provided this energy does not 
 spring from opinionativeness, but from the fact that 
 he is conscious of having, to the extent of his moral 
 ability, examined into the matter ; and although what 
 is then done may be bad, he is nevertheless assured 
 that he did his duty ; whereas, if one performs a 
 virtuous action, and yet means to do evil, or even does 
 not take pains to know what he is doing, he does not 
 act as a virtuous man. 
 
 As for honor and praise, they are often bestowed 
 upon the gifts of fortune ; but, as I am sure that your 
 Majesty thinks more highly of your virtue than of 
 your crown, I do not hesitate to say here that it seems 
 to me there is nothing but virtue which can rightly 
 be praised. All other goods deserve simply to be 
 cherished and not to be honored or commended, ex- 
 cept on the presupposition that they are acquired, or 
 obtained from God, by the right use of our free will ; 
 for honor and praise are a kind of reward, and nothing 
 but that which depends upon the will can be the sub- 
 ject of reward or punishment. 
 
 There remains still to show that from the right use 
 of free will results the greatest and most solid satisfac- 
 tion of life ; which does not seem to me to be difficult, 
 for considering carefully wherein consists pleasure or 
 delight, and in general all the forms of gratification 
 there may be, I observe, in the first place, that there 
 is none which does not exist entirely within the mind, 
 although many of them depend upon the body ; just 
 as it is the mind which sees, although it be through
 
 ETHICS] ON THE HIGHEST GOOD. 345 
 
 the medium of the eyes. I observe, next, that there 
 is nothing which can afford satisfaction to the mind 
 but the thought that it is in the possession of some 
 good, and that frequently this idea is nothing but a very 
 confused representation, and also that its union with 
 the body is the cause of the mind's commonly repre- 
 senting certain goods as incomparably greater than 
 they are ; but that if it should distinctly recognize 
 their just value, its satisfaction would always be pro- 
 portioned to the greatness of the good whence it pro- 
 ceeds. 
 
 I observe, further, that the greatness of a good in 
 our esteem should not be measured simply by the 
 value of the thing in which it consists, but mainly also 
 by the manner in which it is related to ourselves ; 
 and besides, free will being in itself the noblest thing 
 which can exist within us, inasmuch as it renders us 
 in a certain manner equal to God, and appears to ex- 
 empt us from being subject to him, and by conse- 
 quence its right use is the greatest of all our goods 
 it is also that which is most peculiarly our own, and is 
 of the highest importance to us ; whence it follows 
 that from it alone can proceed our highest satisfac- 
 tions ; as witness, for example, the peace of mind and 
 interior delight of those who know that they have 
 never failed to do their best, as well in the effort to 
 know what is good, as in the gaining of it a pleasure 
 beyond comparison more sweet, more lasting, and 
 substantial than all that come from any other 
 source. .
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Abelard, cited, 155. 
 
 Absolute and relative, defined, 
 
 74, 75- 
 
 Acids, action of, 218. 
 Air, 218, 219, 224, elements 
 
 of, 227. 
 
 Algebra, 46, 68, 74. 
 Anaclastic, the, 82. 
 Analysis of the Ancients, 46. 
 Anger, 336. 
 Animal spirits, 276 ff. , 296. 
 
 A priori demonstrations of nat- 
 ural events, 246. 
 
 Aristotle, 333. 
 
 Arithmetic and geometry, the 
 most certain sciences, 63. 
 
 Arts, method in, 88. 
 
 Attribute, 194, ff. 
 
 Augustine, cited, 117. 
 
 A utomata, bodies compared to, 
 280. 
 
 Automatism of brutes, 280 ff. 
 
 Axioms, 193. 
 
 Bacon, Lord, cited, 86. 
 
 Blood, circulation of the, 295. 
 
 Body, meaning of term, 120; 
 extension its essence, 176 ; 
 divisible, 183; distinguished 
 from mind, 293; living and 
 dead, 294; pleasures of, 337. 
 
 Brain, impressions in, 184, 186. 
 
 Brutes, ajttomata, 281 ff. ; do 
 not think, 282 ; have no 
 proper language, 283 ; have 
 no souls, 285. 
 
 Catherine,Queen, letter to, 342. 
 
 Cause and effect, 76 ; reality 
 in, 132. 
 
 Chance, no such power, 316. 
 
 Chaos, 235. 
 
 Circular, all movements, 222. 
 
 Clearness and distinctness in 
 conception, test of truth, 126, 
 154, 165, 169, 176, 179, 191. 
 
 Cogito, ergo sum, 115. 
 
 Coleridge, cited, 292, 297, 325. 
 
 Colors, in objects, 203. 
 
 Comets, 230, 251 ff. 
 
 Compassion, 324. 
 
 Composite and simple objects, 
 
 85, 97- 
 
 Conarium, 299. 
 
 Conception, distinguished from 
 imagination, 169. 
 
 Concurrence of God, 156, 194. 
 
 Connection, contingent and 
 necessary, 100. 
 
 Contempt and esteem, 320. 
 
 Contentment, 329, 330 ; rules 
 for securing. 330 ff. 
 
 Contradiction, test of impos- 
 sibility, 169. 
 
 Corporeal things, ideas of, 135; 
 proof of their existence, 178. 
 
 Death, cause of, 293. 
 
 Deduction and intuition, the 
 paths to knowledge, 64, 79 ; 
 how rehted, 90. 
 
 Definitions, logical, 118, 119. 
 
 Desire, defined, 311 ; where 
 the issue depends upon our- 
 selves, 314 ; and upon other 
 things, 315; what sort is com- 
 patible with happiness, 331. 
 
 347
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Diophantes, mathematician, 70. 
 Discipline of the mind, the end 
 
 of studies, 61. 
 Distinct and clear conceptions j 
 
 true, 126. 
 Doubt, not for doubt's sake, 
 
 56; the starting-point, 113, 
 
 187. 
 Duration, 195. 
 
 Earth, element of, 227 ; the, 
 230; motion of the, 260. 
 
 Elements, their number, etc., 
 226, 228, 229. 
 
 Eloquence, nature of, 39. 
 
 Eminently, 133, 137, 178. 
 
 Emotions, interior, 317. 
 
 End of action, 333. 
 
 Energy, active and passive, 95. 
 
 Enumeration, methodical, 77 ; 
 or induction, 78, 79 ; suf- 
 ficient, 79, 80. 
 
 Epicurus, 333, 334, 343. 
 
 Erdmann, reference to, 99. 
 
 Error, nature and source of, 
 148, 150 ; in judgments based 
 upon the senses, 174. 
 
 Esteem and contempt, 320. 
 
 Existence of God not separable 
 from his essence, 162. 
 
 Extension, 159 ; essence of 
 body, 176, 200, 236. 
 
 Faculties, employed in knowl- 
 edge, 83, 85, 92 ; active and 
 passive, 177 ; of mind, not 
 parts, 183. 
 
 Faith, verities of the, 55 ; an 
 act of will, 65. 
 
 Feeling, nature of, 172. 
 
 Final cause, not to be sought 
 in nature, 149, 184. 
 
 Fire, element of, 226, 229, 231. 
 
 Fischer, K., references to, 58, 
 84, 139, 144, n. 
 
 Flame, 211, 217, 219, 228. 
 
 Fluids, 215, 216, 217, 220. 
 
 Gassendi, reply to, 116. 
 General notions, 192. 
 
 Geometry and arithmetic, the 
 most certain sciences, 63. 
 
 Gland, pineal, 276 ff., 298 ff. 
 
 God, proofs of existence of, 
 126 ff., 144 ; idea of, 132, 
 135. 137, 195 ; first of innate 
 ideas, 165; all other knowl- 
 edge dependent on the knowl- 
 edge of, 166, 168 ; the only 
 substance, 194 ; concourse of , 
 necessary to perception, 194 ; 
 immutable, 239, 243 ; author 
 of all movements in the uni- 
 verse, 248. 
 
 Good, the highest, 333, 342, 
 
 343- 
 Goods, of the body and of the 
 
 mind, 343. 
 Gravity, theory of, 259 ff. 
 
 Habit, necessary to virtue, 338, 
 
 341; 
 
 Happiness, true, 331 ; distin- 
 guished from the highest 
 good, 332, 333. 
 
 Harvey, reference to, 295. 
 
 Hatred and love, denned, 310. 
 _Heartj__structure and action 
 of, 295 ijnot the seat of the 
 passions, 301. 
 
 Heat, nature of^~2ii, 213 ; of 
 the heart, 224, 280, 296. 
 
 Heavens, nature of the, 230; 
 movements of, the cause of 
 the motions of the stars, etc., 
 251 ff. 
 
 Highmindedness, 315, 321 ff. 
 
 History, defects of, 39. 
 
 Hobbes, cited, 154. 
 
 Honor and Praise, how rightly 
 bestowed, 344. 
 
 Humility, 323. 
 
 Hyperaspistes, reply to, 128 n. 
 
 I a thing which thinks, 142. 
 
 I think, therefore I am a nec- 
 essary truth, 115; not the con- 
 clusion of a syllogism, 116; 
 not identical with reasonings 
 of Augustine, 117.
 
 INDEX. 
 
 349 
 
 Idea, a first, 134. 
 
 Ideas, 94, 127, 135; received 
 by the senses, 173. 
 
 Imagination, aid to intellect, 
 83; part of the body, 94; na- 
 ture of, 169. 
 
 Immortal, brutes not, 285. 
 
 immortality of the soul, 337, 
 
 339- 
 
 Inertia, law of, 239. 
 Infinite, a positive idea, 138; 
 
 God actually so, 140. 
 Intelligence, the first thing to 
 
 be known, 61, 83. 
 Intuition, conditions of, 90; and 
 
 deduction, the path to truth, 
 
 64, 104. 
 
 Joy, defined, 311. 
 
 Judgments, from impulse, con- 
 jectures, deduction, 103; the 
 source of error, 127. 
 
 Kant, references to, 84, 180. 
 
 Knowledge, only certain, to be 
 sought, 62; what it is and 
 how far it extends, 84; intel- 
 lect alone capable of, 85; 
 whether it may increase to in- 
 finity, 139. 
 
 Language, belongs to man 
 
 alone, 282. 
 
 Life, the happy, 329. 
 Light, nature of, 207, 250, 262; 
 
 ff . ; properties of, 265 ff. 
 Logic, opinion of, 45, 67, 89. 
 Logical distinction, 198, 199. 
 Love and hatred, defined, 310. 
 
 Mahaffy, reference to, 1 54. 
 Man, the body of, 275 ff. ; 
 
 compared to a machine, 278. 
 Mathematics, love of, 39 ; 
 
 meaning of term, 71; the 
 
 universal science, 72. 
 Mathematical truth, why we 
 
 may doubt it, 112. 
 Matter, primary, 234; essence 
 
 of, its extension, 236; its ten- 
 
 dency to move in straight 
 lines, 243 ff. 
 
 Memory, employed in knowl- 
 edge, 83, 85, 92; explained, 
 303- 
 
 Method, necessity of, 66. 
 
 Mind, always thinks, 128 n.; 
 its essence, thought, 176; in- 
 divisible, 183; receives im- 
 pressions solely from the 
 brain, 184: power over the 
 body, 302; pleasures of, 336. 
 
 Miracles, not wrought in the 
 new world, 246. 
 
 Modal distinction, 198, 199. 
 
 Modes, 192, 196. 
 
 Motion, heat and light, modes 
 of, 211, 213 ; forms of, 215 ; 
 always circular, 222, 243, 
 247 ; of matter at creation, 
 235, 238 ; three rules of, 
 239 ff. ; simplest form of, 
 240. 
 
 Moral code, 50. 
 
 Natural phenomena, all are 
 modes of motion, 245. 
 
 Nature, light of, 130, 132, 136, 
 140, 142, 146, 155 ; the or- 
 der established by God in 
 creation, 179 ; truth of its 
 teachings, 179, 180; falsity 
 of its teachings, 181, 187 ; 
 sense of the term, 179, 181, 
 238. 
 
 Negation and privation, 99, 
 156. 
 
 Nerves, origin in the brain, 94, 
 184. 
 
 Notions, simple, 192; common, 
 or axioms, 193. 
 
 Number, 197. 
 
 Object and idea, 131. 
 Objective reality, 132. 
 Ontological argument for the 
 being of God, 162 ff. 
 
 Pain and pleasure, sensations 
 of, 209.
 
 35 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Pappus, mathematician, 70. 
 
 Particular truths known before 
 general, 117. 
 
 Particles, into which matter is 
 divisible, 216, 219. 
 
 Passion, is action, 291 ; dis- 
 tinguished from bodily func- 
 tions, 292 ; effect of, 302, 
 335, 330, 338. 
 
 Passions, primary causes of, 
 307 ; their service, 307, 310, 
 313 ; how their number is 
 determined, 307 ff. ; due to 
 the motions of the blood and 
 spirits, 312 ; upon them de- 
 pend all the good and evil of 
 this life, 325. 
 
 Perceptible, what objects are, 
 224. 
 
 Perception, is thought, 122 ; 
 the self known in, 124 ; de- 
 pendent on motion, 224. 
 
 Perfection, of the universe, 150, 
 157; pleasure measured by, 
 335 ; true object of love, 335. 
 
 Perspicacity, how cultivated, 87. 
 
 Philosophy, opinion of, 40. 
 
 Pineal gland, 276, 298 ff. 
 
 Pity, 324. 
 
 Planets, 230, 251 ff., 255 ff.; 
 scintillations of, 272. 
 
 Pleasure, senses of the term, 
 333 ; as end of action, 334 ; 
 measure of, 335 ; kinds, 
 
 335 ff- 
 
 Poetry, 39. 
 
 Preservation, continued crea- 
 tion, 141. 
 
 Privation, 99, 155. 
 
 Probable opinions, when to be 
 followed, 52. 
 
 Providence, divine, 315, 316. 
 
 Real distinction, 198. 
 
 Reason, intuitive and discur- 
 sive, 99 ; office of, 336, 337. 
 
 Regret, how avoided, 331. 
 
 Relative and Relations, defined, 
 75- 
 
 Revenge, 336. 
 
 Sadness, defined, 312. 
 Sagacity, how cultivated, 87. 
 Science, nothing but the human 
 
 intelligence, 61. 
 Sciences, all bound together, 
 
 62. 
 Self, existence of, undeniable, 
 
 114. 
 
 Self-esteem, ground of, 321. 
 Seneca, reference to, 329, 332, 
 
 333- 
 Sense, perceives passively, 93 ; 
 
 the common, 93, 94, 184. 
 Senses, deceive us, 108. 
 Sensations, 172, 202, 213. 
 Sensible qualities, 136. 
 Simple and composite things, 
 
 85, 97- 
 
 Sleep, illusions in, 109. 
 
 Society, interests of, to be pre- 
 ferred to those of self, 339 ff . 
 
 Solids, 215, 216, 217, 220. 
 
 Soul, united to the body, 297 ; 
 ana DOdy, how they act on 
 one another ,_30i ; conflict of 
 inferior and superior parts, 
 305 ff . 
 
 Sound, nature of, 208. 
 
 Space, not empty, 221. 
 
 Stars, fixed, 230 ; scintillations 
 of, 270. 
 
 Substance, 136 ; infinite and 
 finite, 138; defined, 194; 
 two forms of, I94j ,2Ojo_2Q2._. 
 
 Sun and stars, formation of, 
 247 ff. 
 
 Syllogism, of no use in discov- 
 ery, 90. 
 
 Theology, reverence for, 40. . , 
 Thinking substance, the mind, ; 
 
 176, 200. 
 
 Thought, what it is, 115, 121. \ 
 Time, distinguished from du- 
 
 ration, 196. 
 
 Understanding, not the source 
 of error, 151; should precede 
 will, 155. 
 
 Uniformity of motion and fig-
 
 INDEX. 
 
 351 
 
 ure, tendency of matter to- 
 ward, 247 ff. 
 
 Universal and particular no- 
 tions, 75. 
 
 Universals, 197. 
 
 Vacuum, 220, 221, 223, 247. 
 
 Veitch, references to, 58, 125, 
 126, 127, 129, 132, 133, 144, 
 153, 177, 178, 193, 207, 220. 
 
 Verities, eternal, 245. 
 
 Vices, source of, 343, 344. 
 
 Virtue, the remedy for the pas- 
 sions, 318 ; depends upon 
 ourselves, 330 ; defined, 331, 
 344 ; alone worthy of praise, 
 344. 
 
 Volition, effect of, on the body, 
 Voluntary, term defined, 310. 
 
 Will, its range, 152, 156 ; cause 
 of error, 153 ; understanding 
 must precede, 155. 
 
 Wisdom, depends upon our- 
 selves, 330. 
 
 Wonder, 308. 
 
 Words, as symbols, 207. 
 
 World, description of a new, 
 233 ff. 
 
 Zeno, reference to, 333, 343.
 
 i A-
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY 
 
 Los Angeles 
 This book is DUE on the last date stamped below. 
 
 JUN 1 3 1968 
 
 OCT l 
 
 ^JhiftTftl? W 
 
 oin 
 
 Form L9WOm-5,'67(H2161s8)4939 
 
 MAR 1 8 REC'CbEC 4 1984 
 
 DISCHAPCE-URL 
 
 OCT09RC'0
 
 3 1158 00361 6041 
 
 UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 A A 000049974 9