i!T^-::..;-;;!!« i; „ :| ..,,,, ; ,, ; .,,ii $B Mb3 DflO | II; J I II IS* LIBRARY OF THE University of California. GIFT OF Mrs. SARAH P. WALS WORTH. Received October, 1894. ^Accessions No.ffTey'fS^ Class No. 'jm * \ S-- \ -. t .. fe' t %• i I Digitized by the Internet Archive 1 in 2007 with funding from Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/concisesystemoftOOpaterich A CONCISE SYSTEM OF THEOLOGY, ON THE BASIS OF THE SHORTER CATECHISM. BY ALEXANDER *SMITH PATERSON, A.M., H AUTHOR OF A " HISTORY OF THE CHURCH." WITH AN INTRODUCTORY PAPER, BY DUNCAN MACFARLAN, D.D., RENFREW. FROM THE FOURTH EDINEURGH EDITION. NEW YORK: ROBERT CARTER, 58 CANAL STREET, AND PITTSBURG, 56 MARKET STREET. ^1847. Itf^ ADVEKTISEMENT. The Author of the following work, Mr Alexander Smith Paterson, was the elder son of the late Rev. Alexander Pater- son of Dundee, and nephew of the Rev. Dr Paterson, one of the ministers of Montrose. He was educated at the Grammar School and Marischal College, Aberdeen, where his family resided after the death of his father. Although a singularly laborious student, he evinced no small anxiety in the prospect of appearing before the Presb} T tery for examination. This apprehension' was, in a great measure, the occasion of leading him to draw up very ample notes on the topics connected with Ecclesiastical History, which were afterwards posthumously published under the title, " His- tory of the Church from the Creation of the World to the Nine- teenth Century/' The present work was composed with a some- what similar object : and it is supposed that the intensity of mind which he brought to bear on both, in some measure hastened hi3 premature and lamented death, which took place on the 12th of September 1828, in the 25th year of his age. The "Analysis of the Shorter Catechism" was left by Mr Paterson in a state of entire preparation for the press, but various circumstances have delayed its publication. It is now presented to the public entirely on account of its intrinsic merit. The manuscript was submitted to several distinguished ministers, who expressed their opinions in terms of the most unqualified appro- XV ADVERTISEMENT. baiion. In particular, the Rev. Dr Brewster of Craig described it " as being one of the most beautiful, complete, and afccurate expo- sitions of the Shorter Catechism which has ever appeared, — un- folding the meaning of the answers to each question, with a clearness and minuteness of detail hitherto unequalled in works of the kind." Another gentleman of great literary experience, stated, that it " had been prepared with such elaborate care, that, after a critical perusal, he could not suggest the addition or dimi- nution of a single word.* 1 Strong as these testimonies are, the Publisher confidently anticipates that they will be amply borne out by an examination of the work itself. The annexed admirable Paper on the History and Arrange- ment of the Shorter Catechism, by the Rev. Duncan, Macfarlan of Renfrew, appeared some time ago in a periodical publication, and is transferred into this volume with the obliging permission of the author. Edinburgh, August 1841. NOTE TO THE SECOND EDITION. In the present edition several important alterations have been made in the typographical arrangement, calculated to make the work more accessible for reference; and, with a similar view, two new indices have been added — the first showing where the illustration of each individual Question in the Shorter Catechism is to be found, and the other indicating alphabetically the various subjects discussed in the work. Edinburgh, January 1844. ON THE HISTORY AND ARRANGEMENT OF THE SHORTER CATECHISM. r BY THE REV. DUNCAN MACFARLAN, RENFREW. Catechisms were, at a very early period, drawn up and used by all, or nearly all, of the Reformed Churches of Europe. The earliest which we recollect to have seen mentioned, as used by the Scottish Reformers, had been drawn up by Calvin. But in 1590, we find the General Assembly adopting measures for securing a general and national Catechism. " Anent the exami- nation before the communion," say they, u it is thought meet for the common profite of the whole people, that ane uniform order be keepit in examination, and that ane schort form of examination be set down, be their breither, Messrs John Craig, Robert Pont, Thomas Buchanan, and Andrew Melvine, to be presented to the next Assembly." In 1591, a form was laid before the Assembly by Mr Craig, but it was remitted, with instructions "to contract in some schorter bounds." The abridged form was accordingly laid before the Assembly of 1592, and approved. The following directions were also added : — u Therefore, it is thought needful, that every pastor travel with his flock, that they may buy the samen buick, and read it in their families, quhereby they may be the better instructed ; and that the samen be read and learnit in lector's (reading) schools, in place of the little Catechism" (Cal- vin's). This Catechism, or " Form of Examination," which is commonly called Craig's Catechism, consists of twelve heads or chapters, having the following titles : — M Of our miserable bond- age through Adam — Of our redemption by Christ — Of our par- ticipation with Christ — Of the Word — Of our liberty to servo God — Of the Sacraments — Of Baptism — Of the Supper — Of Dis- cipline — Of the Magistrate — Of the Table in special (meaning a2 VI ON THE HISTORY AND ARRANGEMENT the Protestant mode of observing the Supper) — The end of our redemption." Under each of these are a number of questions and answers, amounting in all to ninety-six ; and the latter are remarkably short and pertinent, and usually accompanied with at least one Scripture proof. • When the Solemn League and Covenant was projected, con- templating, as it did, an ecclesiastical union between the three kingdoms, measures were also adopted for preparing a uniform Confession, Directory, and Catechism. And it is important to observe, that the plan afterwards executed by the Westminster Assembly, was first proposed in the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. Towards the end of 1640, several Scottish commissioners, of whom Henderson was one, went to London to treat on matters then pending between the King and the Pres- byterian party. Henderson returned in the July following, and found the General Assembly holding an adjourned meeting at Edinburgh, and anxiously waiting his arrival. He was immedi- ately elected Moderator, and laid before them a letter from the Presbyterians* in and about London, in which they complain of the spread of schismatical opinions, and earnestly crave the advice and assistance of the Assembly. In replying to this letter, the As- sembly says, -among other things, " We have learned by long experience, ever since the time of the Reformation, and specially after the two kingdoms have been — in the great goodness of God to both — united under one head and monarch, but most of all, of late, which is not unknown to you, what danger and contagion in matters of kirk government, of divine worship, and of doc- trine, may come from the one kirk to the other ; which, beside all other reasons, make us to pray to God, and to desire you, and all that love the honour of Christ, and the peace of these kirks and kingdoms, heartily to endeavour, that there might be in both kirks, one Confession, one Directory for Public Worship, one Catechism, and one Form oj Kirk Government.'''' And agreeably to this, we find Henderson suggesting to the same Assembly, only twelve days before the writing of this letter, the propriety of drawing up such a Confession, Catechism, and Directory ; thus leaving scarcely any reason to doubt, that the thing itself was projected by Henderson, and first laid before the General Assembly ; but that the Assembly had itself been long fa vo' li- able to such a measure, and was immediately incited to * -j what had taken place in England. The Assembly accordingly approved highly of the measure, and urged Henderson to under- take the drawing up of the documents required. And to render this the more easy, they allowed him to refrain from preaching, and to avail himself of assistance. But he declined the task, as being too arduous. The subject is repeatedly mentioned in the Assembly's correspondence during the intervening period; but it does not appear that any thing was done before the meeting oJ OF THE SHORTER CATECHISM. Vll the Westminster Assembly in 1643. This Assembly met under the authority of the English Parliament, but chiefly at the in- stance of the Scottish Church. It was composed of i2l divines, with 30 lay assessors, and 5 commissioners from the Church of Scotland, and continued its sittings for upwards of five years. The matters laid before this Assembly were numerous and important, and some of them are detailed with great minuteness. It unfortunately happens, however, that our information respect- ing the drawing up of the Catechisms is meagre and imperfect. The late Dr Belfrage of Falkirk appears to have been at great pains in collecting whatever was accessible on this point. We have made some further inquiries, but have hitherto found scarcely any thing beyond what he seems to have examined and abridged. The sum of what we have been able to gather, either from his work or original authorities, may be stated in a few words. In 1647, while the Assembly was engaged discussing the different articles of the Confession, committees were appointed to reduce these into the form of two Catechisms ; a larger* which was to serve as a text-book for pulpit exposition, according to a usage of the churches on the Continent ; and a shorter, for the instruc- tion of children. It appears, however, that before the Confession had been finished, some progress was made in composing the Catechism, and that the reducing of it to a conformity with the Confession was an after-thought. " We made long ago, 1 * says Baillie, u a pretty progress in the Catechism, but falling on rules and long debates, it was laid aside till the Confession was ended, with the resolution to have no matter in it, but what was ex- pressed in the Confession." And, accordingly, much curiosity has b^en excited respecting the author of the original draft. Dr Belfrage, after detailing various opinions, and assigning rea- sons for his own, alleges Dr Arrowsmith to be the most likely person. After weighing the evidence by which this and several other opinions have been supported, we have not been able to come to any other conclusion, than that the matter is altogether uncertain.* After the Catechism had been finished by the com- * ' While the Confession of Faith was under discussion in the As- sembly, committees were appointed to reduce it into the form of cate- chisms, one Larger, for the service of a public exposition in the pulpit, according to the custom of foreign churches ; the other Smaller, for the instruction of families. It has been generally thought, that a draught or sketch was prepared by some individual of the Shorter Catechism, and laid before the Committee for their revisal. It is not certainly known who this individual was. I have heard it said by a theologian of great research, and now with God, it was his conviction that it was Dr. Arrowsmith. Brooke, in his history of the Puritans, says that he united with several of his brethren in drawing up the Assembly's Cate- chism; and Baillie, in his Letters, says that the Catechism was com- posed by a. committee, of whom Dr Arrowsmith was one. None of the Assembly was more competent to the task. He officiated for some VI 11 ON THE HISTORY AND ARRANGEMENT mittee, it was laid before the Assembly and approved of, first in so many successive portions, and afterwards as a whole. On the 5th of November it was approved of by the Parliament, and would have been licensed by tne king, had not certain hindrances occurred. It was next laid before the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. This was in July 1648. And the following time as one of the University Preachers at Cambridge, where his educa- tion had been completed. It was while officiating as a Preacher at St Martin's, Ironmonger's Lane, London, that he was called lo sit in the Assembly of Divines. Baillie mentions a circumstance which shows the high estimation in which he was held in that council. He calls him a learned divine, on whom the Assembly had put the writing against the Antinomians. He was promoted to be Master of John's College, Cam- bridge, where he discharged the duties of his office with exemplary diligence. " The excellent Dr M'Crie, whose researches have shed so much light on the character, doctrines, and conduct of our Reformers, states, in a communication with which he has favoured me, that from a cir- cumstance mentioned by Baillie, he is inclined to think that Mr Pal- mer was concerned in the first draught of the Catechism. In volume first of the Letters, page 431, he says, ' It was laid on Mr Palmer to draw up a directory for catechising.' The directory contains no article on this point. In the same volume, page 440, he says, ' Mr Palmer's part about catechising was given in, and though the best catechist in England, did not suit, but was left in our hands to frame according to our mind.' There is a work published by this divine, entitled, ' The Principles of the Christian Religion made Plain and Easy,' in which a considerable similarity to the Shorter Catechism may be traced. Pal- mer was constituted Master of King's College, Cambridge, and showed the greatest solicitude to promote religion and learning, maintained several poor scholars at his own expense in the College, and when he died, left a considerable benefaction for the same purpose. "* In running over Wodrow's MSS.,' says Dr M'Crie in his commu- nication, 4 I recollect noticing a statement that he had received infor- mation from some person, that the Catechism was composed by Dr Wallis. This was the celebrated mathematician of that name, who was one of the Secretaries to the Westminster Assembly. Perhaps the statement may have arisen from his official situation, and his name having been seen appended to the printed copy of that work. It would be a feather in the cap of our little formulary, and no real disparage- ment to the philosopher, that its draughtsman was Dr Wallis. In one of his works he avows that he obtained much insight from the discus- sion of so many learned divines, in composing the Confession and Cate- chisms, but says nothing of his having any hand directly in its compila- tion.' " There was another member of the Assembly, Dr Gouge, who may be thought to have 6ome claim to the honour, from his learning and activity, and also from an excellent and comprehensive scheme of divi- nity, in the form of question and answer, which bears his name. He was minister of Black Friars, London, was appointed a member of the Assembly, and nas in such reputation, that he often filled the Mode- rator's chair in his absence. Amidst claims so varied, I am inclined to think, with all due veneration for the memory of the rest, that the weightiest is that of Dr Arrowsmith. Baillie says, • We have nearly agreed in private on a draught of Catechism, on which, when it comes in public, we may have little debate.' From the MSS. of Mr George Gillespie, it appears, that after the report had been given in and con- OF THE SHORTER CATECHISM. IX was the deliverance of the Assembly : — " The General Assembly having seriously considered the Shorter Catechism, agreed upon by the Assembly of Divines sitting at Westminster, with the assistance of commissioners from this Kirk, do find, upon due examination thereof, that the said Catechism is agreeable to the Word of God, and in nothing contrary to the received doctrine, worship, discipline, and government of the Kirk; and therefore approve the said Shorter Catechism, as a part of the intended uniformity, to be a Directory for catechising such as are of weaker capacity.'" The year following it was also ratified by an act of the Scottish Parliament. And from that time it has continued to be in common use, generally in Scotland, and among Presby- terians and several other denominations in England and Ireland ; and has latterly obtained a firm footing in the United States, in most of the British colonies, and at not a few missionary stations far hence among the heathen. And it is remarkable, that amidst all the controversies which have occurred, it has been almost universally approved by every party of orthodox believers. " Amidst the jealousy and rivalship of contending parties," says the late pious and judicious Dr Belfrage, " it has been a centre of union, in which the faith and charity of good men have met ; and in seasons of innovation, when a veneration for what is ancient is derided as the freak of imbecility or prejudice ; when 4 the march of intellect ' is the pretext for every change, however presumptuous or violent, and when all the foundations of the earth seem out of course, this summary of the truth remains un- injured and revered; and it will continue to be an exhibition and defence of pure religion and undefiled, before God and the Father, to the latest age." Frequent notice has been taken of the extraordinary simplicity of arrangement and depth of thought observable in the Assem- bly's Shorter Catechism. Of the former, I have just had a re- markable proof, in reading over Dr Chalmers* preface to the first volume of the new edition of his works. With his usual clearness and analytical acumen, he proposes two methods of studying Theology. According to the one, the first object of contemplation is the Divine Being; and then the history of his sidered, the Catechism was recommitted, that improvements suggested by the wisdom of the Assembly might be made. I find in the letters of Baillie various hints respecting the progress of the Catechism. ' We made long ago,' says he, ' a pretty progress in the Catechism, but fall- ing on rule and long debates, it was laid asi a till the Confession was ended, with the resolution to have no matter in it but what was ex- pressed in the Confession, which should not be debated again in the Catechism.' In another letter of later date, he says, ' We have passed a quarter of the Catechism, and thought to have made a short work with the rest, but we have fallen into such endless janglings about the method and the matter, that all think it will be a long work : the in- crease of all heresies is very great."' — Bel/rage's Shorter Catechism, vol. i. pp. 14-18. i ON THE HISTORY AND ARRANGEMENT doings in this world, detailed in natural, if not chronological order. The tether fixes at once on some awakened sinner, and accompanying him as he advances in knowledge and holiness describes progressively the discoveries which he makes, or which are made to him, in the word and works of God. The former considers God abstract^, and follows out the other branches as so many of his works. And divinity taught upon this principle recommends itself to reason, as regularly deductive and capable of systematic arrangement. And accordingly, this is the princi- ple on which catechisms and systems of divinity are usually con- structed. The other, instead of the matter observed, takes up the observer: and simply recording what he is supposed to see and feel, as he advances towards perfection, the same subjects pass in review: but they are seen from different points, and under different lights. They are seen, not as abstract truths, but as practical directions. And this, therefore, is the view of divine truth best fitted for the guidance of the heart and conduct. The principles thus referred to, are, if we mistake not, the same with the categories of Aristotle and the first principles of Bacon ; the one assuming, as the basis of his arrangement, being, or the things about which men think ; and the other, the powers of mind by which these are known and enjoyed. Now, it is per- haps new to some of our readers to be told, that the profound distinctions of an Aristotle and a Bacon are employed in the construction of that humble Primer called the Shorter Catechism ; and that the prolific mind of a Chalmers could not have selected a finer example of its own original speculations, than is to bo found in this directory for catechising such as are of a weaker capacity. The number of Questions in this little manual, is, in all, one hundred and seven. The first three are introductory — God's chief or principal end in creating man ; the rule by which man may attain to that end, and the principal branches into which that rule may be divided, are the topics thus introduced. From the beginning of the fourth question, to the end of the thirty-eighth, we have a system of divinity, regularly constructed according to the first of the two principles explained. Every thing stated under these questions, is laid down speculatively — that is, as a matter of study and contemplation, not of command and direction. Each answer tells us what is, and not what should be. The arrangement of topics, also, is such as to show their consecutive dependence on each other, so that, like so many links of a chain, they are all sustained from the primary question, \ — " What is God?" This will be observed in a mere rehearsal of the subjects, of which the questions are composed : — the being and attributes of God — the persons in the Godhead — the divine purposes or decrees — the execution of these in creation — their fulfilment in providence — the special providence of God towards OF THE SHORTER CATECHISM. XI man, in an unfallen state — in the fall and its consequences — in redemption from these — in the character and offices of the Re- deemer — in what he did on earth to redeem man, and in what he is raised to in heaven, for the further purposes of redemption — in applying to sinners the blessings of redemption by the Holy Spirit — his operations in effectual calling, justification, adoption, and sanctification — and the fruits of these in life, at death, at the resurrection, and throughout eternity. From the beginning of the thirty-ninth question, to the end of the book, the topics are strictly practical, and they are so arranged as to furnish an appropriate directory for every stage of Christian advancement. The subjects introduced are not presented specu- latively, but as pointing to the conscience and the heart, and as leading forth the mind, and guiding the conduct, into the ways of God. And accordingly, the arrangement, instead of assuming some principle in the matter of contemplation, assumes a princi- ple in the man, and proceeds to address and direct him in all his advances onward to perfection. It is in this way that the thirty- ninth question commences with what " God requireth of man?" It is thus the first arrow driven from this quiver, is so pointed as to aim at the conscience, God's witness in man. And the com- mandments which follow are as a bundle of these. They are variously pointed, yet all have a point ; and this very diversity only fits them the more for the diversified circumstances in which man is found. One, for example, is aimed at the conscience of such as worship strange gods, — another at those who worship even the true God, through the medium of images, — a third at the blasphemer, — a fourth at the Sabbath-breaker, — a fifth at children who are disobedient to parents, — a sixth at murderers, — a seventh at adulterers, — an eighth at thieves, — a ninth at liars, — and a tenth at the covetous. And to render each of these sharp as a u two-edged sword," there is under each, first, what concerns the " want of conformity to," and then, what belongs to the w transgression of;" in other words, a u required," and a M forbidden," with occasional reasons also annexed. Nor does each commandment point only to as many individual sins or duties, but under these, to as many classes of both. It is therefore scarcely possible to conceive of any arrangement better fitted to bring home guilt to every conscience. And it is accordingly followed by other questions, respecting man's inability to keep the commands, the sins of which he thus becomes guilty, and the eternal judgments to which he is exposed. By these he is left helpless and hopeless, under a- sentence of condemnation, and is thus driven to inquire, what he must do to be saved. Here the very next question takes him up, tells him how he may escape the wrath and curse of God due by sin, and explains this, under the heads of faith in Jesus Christ, repentance unto life, and the ordinary means of grace. Even in this subordinate arrange- XII ON THE HISTORY AND ARRANGEMENT ment, the condition of the inquirer is kept steadily in view. The only direct answer which can be given to the question, " What must I do to be saved?" is, " repent and believe;" and agree- ably to this, the only points immediately explained in the Cate- chism, are faith in Jesus Christ, and repentance unto life. Re- pentance is the turning of the heart from every thing else to God, as reconciled in Christ ; and faith is the looking at Christ lelievingly, as the gift of God, and receiving him as the salvation of the soul. But this very M looking at Christ," and " turning of the heart" to God, as reconciled in Christ, imply some knowledge of his will, and create a desire for the enjoyment of othei ordi- nances. And these next follow, under the teaching of the Word, the observance of the sacraments, and the exercise of prayer. An awakened and repentant sinner seeks early and earnestly to know the will of God. The Catechism meets him, offering instruction respecting the profitable reading of the Word, and waiting on the ordinance of preaching. But supposing him to be in some mea- sure instructed, he yet desires to receive seals of the covenant, and may never before have partaken of any of its signs. The nature, use, and proper observance of the sacraments are there- fore now unfolded. And last of all comes prayer, not as if the individual were up till this time considered prayerless, but be- cause it is now that he especially requires to be taught how to pray for such things as he ought ; and this, because it is now that he declares himself to be an heir of those promises qn which prayer rests, and through which it obtains blessings. The prayer of the soul, like breath in the natural body, is essential to life, and, like it, begins properly as soon as we are born anew. But though this be its beginning, its end is unseen. The renewed soul becoming more and more conformed to the will of God, enters more and more into the spirit of prayej, and finds, in the simple but comprehensive example with which the Catechism concludes, materials more and more fitted for guiding its inter- course with the Father of Spii'ts. 1. By using the Catechism in the right observance of these distinctions and principles, we shall be better able to understand each question in its true and proper meaning; and the reason why such questions as Effectual Calling and Justification are so far separated from Faith in Jesus Christ and Repentance unto Life ; and how, in general, the doctrines of the Gospel, as con- tained in both parts of the Catechism, should not be together. These things happen, simply because we have, in the first, a spe- culative system, and, in the latter, a practical directory. The doctrines of the Gospel are necessary to both, but require to be presented in different forms, so as the more perfectly to secure the different ends contemplated. 2. Each division may thus be turned to its own proper use. OF THE SHORTER CATECHISM. Xlll Suppose, for example, that I were asked in what book a clear outline of the Christian faith might be found and studied, I would at once say, " In the first thirty-eight questions of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism." But if I were asked for a practical guide, to lead men to Christ, and to train them to holiness, I would say, M Begin at the thirty-ninth question, and be guided with those which follow, onward to the end." 3. Even children might, on these principles, be taught to greater advantage than they usually are. Instead of beginning to instruct a child, respecting the abstract character of God, the distinctions of personality in the Godhead, the doctrine of decrees, and other matters of difficult comprehension, I would begin my attempts to instruct him, with the meaning and application of each succeeding commandment, and onwards to the end; by which time, he would have materials out of which to conceive of God, of his purposes and works ; and his mind would be also, in some measure, prepared for more abstract processes of thinking. 4. Much of the apparent abstruseness of this little work would in this way disappear, and on the same principle on which science becomes comparatively easy, when perceived in a proper course and by proper means. Depart from the arrangements of a Lin- naeus and Jussieu, and the beautiful order observable in botany will appear confused and perplexing; or invert the order in any process of mathematical inquiry, and the evenness of the way along which we find an easy path will be rugged to the master, and impassable to the pupil. And strange were it, indeed, if an arrangement so exact and so well adapted to its own special ends as that of the Catechism, should nevertheless leave each question to be taken up, like some cube cast on a gammon board, in any order and with equal intelligence. 5. If these principles and distinctions were more observed, more justice would be done to the merits of the work, an CONCERNING GOD CONSIDERED IN HIMSELF. Nature and Perfections of God ..... 29 Unity of G od . . . . . . . 40 Trinity of Persons in the Godhead .... 42 CHAPTER II. CONCERNING GOD'S DOINGS WITH RESPECT TO HI9 CREATURES. Section 1.— Of the Nature and Character of God's Decrees . 47 Section II.— Of the Execution of God's Decrees . . 61 In the Creation of the World ..... 52 „ Creation of Man . . . . . 54 „ Nature and Character of God's General Providence 56 Section III.— Of the Special Providence of God towards Man in his Creation and Fall. Covenant of Works— its Parties and Terms . . 58 Man's Disobedience and Fall by Sin .... 62 Nature of Sin in (ieneral ..... 63 Nature of Adam's Sin in Particular .... 65 1. Extent of the Fall ..... 68 2. Consequences of the Fall .... 70 3. Sinfulness of Man's State by the Fall . . . ib. 4. Misery of Man's State by the Fall ... 73 XVI CONTENTS. PAGE Section IV.— Of the Special Providence of God towards Man in Redemption. Dw. 1. — Plan of Redemption . . . . 76 The Person and Character of the- Redeemer . 83 The Redeemer's Assumption of human Nature 86 The Offices of the Redeemer . . . 89 1. Prophetical Office .... 92 2. Priestly Office .... 93 3. Kingly Office .... 100 Div. 2.— The States in which the Redeemer executed his Threefold Office. State of Humiliation . „ . .104 State of Exaltation . . . .107 Div. 3. — Of the Application of Redemption. Of the Agent by whom Redemption is applied 112 „ Means used for the Application of Re- demption in Effectual Calling . 115 „ Manner and Order of the Application of Redemption in Effectual Calling . 117 Dw. 4.— Of the Benefits of Redemption. Benefits of Redemption in this Life . . 122 1. Of Justification .... 125 2. Of Adoption .... 132 3. Of Sanctification . . . . 135 4. Additional Benefits ... 139 Benefits of Redemption at the Resurrection 147 PART SECOND. THE DUTY WHICH GOD REQUIRES OF MAN. Introduction.— Nature of Man's Duty in General . . 153 CHAPTER I. Section I. — Of the Moral Law, binding on all rational creatures, as summed up in the Ten Commandments. Of the Moral Law .... 155 Summary of the Moral Law . . . 162 Sum of the Ten Commandments . . 166 Preface to the Ten Commandments . . 169 Section II — The Duties which we owe to God— contained in the first four Commandments of the Law. Div. 1. — The First Commandment . . . 172 Duties required . # • . . ib. Sins forbidden .... 175 Of the expression " Before Me" . . 177 CONTENTS. xvii Div. 2.— The Second Commandment Duties required . . Sins forbidden Reasons annexed Div. 3.— The Third Commandment Duties required . . Sins forbidden Reason annexed Div. 4. — The Fourth Commandment Duties required . Change of the Sabbath . Sanctification of the Sabbath Sins forbidden Reasons annexed PAGE 178 179 181 184 186 187 191 193 196 ib. 201 204 207 209 Section III. — The Duties which we owe to man— contained m the last six Commandments of the Law. Div. 1.— -The Fifth Commandment Duties required . Sins forbidden Reason annexed . Div. 2.— The Sixth Commandment Duties required . Sins forbidden Div. 3. — The Seventh Commandment Duties required . Sins forbidden . Div. 4. — The Eighth Commandment Duties required . Sins forbidden Div. 5.— The Ninth Commandment Duties required . Sins forbidden Div. 6. — The Tenth Commandment Duties required . Sins forbidden 212 ib. 220 225 227 ib. 229 232 ib. 233 236 ib. 238 242 ib. 244 247 ib. 250 CHAPTER II. Introduction. Man's Inability to keep the Moral Law . . . Different Degrees of Guilt in Breaking the Law . Desert of every Breach of the Law .- SPECIAL DUTIES REQUIRED OP MAN UNDER THE GOSPEL DISPENSATION. Section I. —Faith in Jesus Christ .. 253 256 259 XVlil CONTENTS. PAGE Section II. —Repentance unto Life . . . • . 282 Section III. — The Diligent Use of the Means of Grace . 286 Dw. 1.— Of the Word of God as a Means of Grace. 1. Effects of the Word of God . . . 290 2. Proper Use of the Word of God . . 294 Div. 2. — Of the Sacraments as a Means of Grace. 1. Of the Efficacy of the Sacraments . , 297 2. n Nature of the Sacraments . . 300 3. „ New Testament Sacraments . 303 4. „ Nature and Use of Baptism • . 307 5. „ Subjects of Baptism . . . 314 6. „ Nature and Use of the Lord's Supper 320 7. „ Proper Observance of the Lord's Supper 329 Dw. 3. — Of Prayer as a Means of Grace. 1. Of the Nature of Prayer . . .340 2. „ Rule of Direction in Prayer . 347 3. n Preface to the Lord's Prayer . 350 4. „ First Petition in the Lord's Prayer 353 6. „ Second Petition in the Lord's Prayer 357 6. „ Third Petition in the Lord's Prayer 361 7. n Fourth Petition in the Lord's Prayer 364 8. „ Fifth Petition in the Lord's Prayer 368 9. „ Sixth Petition in the Lord's Prayer 373 10. „ Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer . 379 THE ASSEMBLY'S SHORTER CATECHISM ANALYZED AND EXPLAINED. GENERAL INTRODUCTION. SHOWING THE CHIEF DESIGN OF MAN'S CREATION THAT THE SCRIPTURES ARE THE ONLY RULE OF FAITH AND DUTY AND THE TWO PRINCIPAL TOPICS TREAT- ED OF IN SCRIPTURE, AND EXPLAINED IN THE TWO DIVISIONS OF THE CATECHISM. The Chief Design of Mans Creation. $. 1 — TOjat (i tlje Qfyitf i£n& of 0Lzn ? Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him for ever. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That the chief design of man's creation, in reference to God, "was to glorify him. 1 Cor. x. 31. — " Whether therefore ye eat or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God/* 2, That the chief design of man's creation, in reference to him- self, was the enjoyment of God for ever. Ps. lxxiii. 25, 26. — " Whom have I in heaven but thee ? and there is none upon earth that I desire beside thee. — God is my portion for ever/* 20 THE CHIEF DESIGN OF MAN'S CUttAfiW. EXPLANATION. observation 1. — The chief end of man's creation, in reference a God, was to glorify him. The glory of God is commonly distinguished into his essential and his declarative glory. 1. God's essential glory is what he is absolutely in himself. "I am that I am." — Exod. iii. 14. It is that glory which he has in himself, and which he will not give to another. This glory is infinite, eternal, and unchangeable ; and, consequently, it can neither be increased nor diminished. — Job xxxv. 7 ; Ps. xvi. 2. 2. God's declarative glory in his making known his glory to, by, and in, the creatures which he hath made. The irrational creatures, both animate and inanimate, glorify God passively, by affording matter of praise to God, their Maker. — Ps. xix. 1. But we, his rational creatures, ought to glorify him actively, — by setting our hearts wholly upon him, — by making use of all things in subordination to his glory, and only as means more perfectly to show forth his praise, — by being willing to part with every thing dear to us, rather than not maintain and declare his glory, — and by employing for this purpose all the powers and faculties which he hath conferred upon us — (1 Cor. vi. 20 ; Matt. v. 16) — by obeying his commandments, — and by acknowledging all his perfections. God is to be glorified in all things. — 1 Cor. x. 31 ; 1 Pet. iv. 11. We are to glorify him in all our actions, whether natural, as eating and drinking, &c. ; or civil, as in the common affairs of life ; or moral and religious, in the duties which we owe to God. " There is not a grain of real goodness in the most spacious ac- tions which are performed without a reference to the glory of God. This the world cannot understand; but it will appear highly reasonable to those who take their ideas of God from the Scriptures, and who have felt the necessity and found the benefits of redemption." We ought to make the glory of God our chief end in all our actions. 1. Because it was God's chief end in our creation, pre- servation, and redemption. 2. Because God hath made us capable of glorifying him. 3. Gratitude should excite us to make this our chief end. — Ps. c. 3 ; Pro v. xvi. 4 ; Ps. lxvi. 8, 9 ; 1 Cor. vi. 19,20; Ps. ciii. 1-5. We may here observe, that no man can glorify God acceptably, until he believes in Jesus Christ ; for without faith it is impossi- ble to please him ; and whatsoever is not of faith is sin. — Heb. xi. 6 ; Kom. xiv. 23. Nor can we of ourselves glorify God ; for of ourselves we can do nothing good. — John xv. & But seeing THE CHIEF DESIGN OF MAN*S CREATION. 21 God hath promised the grace of his Spirit, we should not be weary in well-doing. Obs. 2. — The chief end of maris creation, in reference to him self tvas the enjoyment of God for ever. To enjoy God is to acquiesce or rest in God as the chief good, with complacency and delight ; or it is to feel unspeakably happy in his presence. — Ps. cxvi. 7. Believers enjoy God in this world as well as in that which is to come. — Gen. v. 24 ; 1 John i. 3 ; 1 Cor. i. 9. But there is a very great difference between the enjoyment of God here and the enjoyment of him hereafter. In this world, the enjoyment of God is mediate ; that is, ordinances intervene : but in the world to come it will be immediate ; ordinances will be unknown — means shall be done away. Here, the enjoyment of God is only begun : there, it will be completed. Here, it is partial : there, it will he full. — 1 Cor. xiii. 12; Ps. xvi. 11. The enjoyment of God in this world consists in union with God in Christ, through faith in him. And from this flows communion with him in this world. The external means by which we are to seek after this enjoy- ment, and in which we hold communion with God, are, the insti- tutions of his appointment, public, private, and secret ; such as prayer, meditation, the reading, and preaching, and hearing of the Word, and the sacraments, &c. The enjoyment of God here is a pledge of the full enjoyment of him hereafter in glory, when believers shall be admitted into his glorious presence, where they shall have a full sense of his love, and fully and eternally acquiesce and rest in him with per- fect and inconceivable delight and joy. — 1 Cor. xiii. 12; Ps. xvi. 11. We ought chiefly to desire and seek the enjoyment of God for ever, because he is the chief good, and in the enjoyment of him consists man's chief happiness ; and likewise, because God is but imperfectly and inconstantly enjoyed here, and we cannot be perfectly happy until we eternally enjoy him in heaven. — Ps. iv. 6, 7; 1 Cor. xiii. 9, 10; Ps. xvi. 11. It may here be observed, that, in the world to come, believers will have communion not only with God in Christ, but also with angels, and with their brethren of mankind redeemed from among the nations. Obs. 3. — The glorifying of God, and the enjoyment of him, are inseparably connected. The glorifying and the enjoyment of God are here connected as one chief end, because God hath inseparably connected them ; and no one can truly design and seek the one, without, at the same time, designing and seeking the other. And we may here 22 THE CHIEF DESIGN OF MAN'S CREATION. remark, that the glorifying of God is here set before the enjoy- ment of him for ever, to show that the former is the means by which the latter is obtained ; that holiness on earth must precede happiness in heaven ; and that none shall enjoy God for ever, who have no desire to glorify him in this world. — Heb. xii. 14 ; Matt. v. 8. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. That there is great cause for lamentation, that God and his glory are so seldom the subject of our meditation. 2. The necessity of examining ourselves, whether we have ever viewed the glory of God as our chief end ? whether it is our desire to do what he hath commanded, and to abstain from what he hath forbidden? 3. That we ought to be convinced that of ourselves we cannot glorify God, and there- fore, that prayer for the Spirit of God is absolutely necessaiy, to enable us to glorify him in our bodies and in our spirits which are his. 4. That the soul of man is immortal ; for, seeing that a desire of happiness is natural to it, and that nothing can satisfy its desire or constitute its chief good but God, it is evident that we must inscribe immortality on this better part of man. 5. The goodly heritage of the people of God beyond the grave. 6*. The necessity of holiness. 7. That the believer ought not to be dis- couraged on account of the difficulties with which he may meet- in the way to heaven, seeing that they are but of short duration — that they are but light afflictions. — Rom. viii. 18. Lastly, That it ought to be our aim, while we are in this world, in the strength of divine grace, to glorify God in all things, that we may enjoy him for ever in the world to come. The Scriptures the only Rule of Faith and Duty. (St. 2.-— fflBijat ftttle fyatl) CSoa gften to otmt us l)0fo toe map glortfg ano ntfoj tjtm? The Word of God, which is contained in the Scrip- tures of the Old and New Testaments, is the only rule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — , 1. The necessity of a rule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy God. Jer. x. 23. — "The way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." See also Acts ii. 37. 2. That the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God. 2 Tim. iii. 16. — " All Scripture is given by inspiration of God." See also 2 Pet. i. 21. 0. That the Word of God is the only rule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him. Isa. viii. 20. — " To the law and to THE SCRIPTURES THE ONLY RULE OF FAITH AND DUTY. 23 the testimony : if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.'" EXPLANATION. Obs. 4. — We need a rule to direct us how to glorify and enjoy God. " The light of nature, and the works of creation and providence, show indeed that there is a God ; that this God is infinite in his being, and wisdom, and power, and - goodness.; and that he is to be worshipped and glorified by his creatures. But they cannot fully and savingly show what God is ; they cannot reveal his love and mercy to sinners in his Son ; they cannot reveal how he should be glorified and worshipped ; and they cannot direct us how we should enjoy him, ^either here or hereafter. — Rom. L 20, and ii. 14; 1 Cor. i. 21 ; Heb. xi. 6; Rom. x. 17; Acts iv. 12. Obs. 5. — The Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are Vie Word of God, or a revelation from heaven. The word Scriptures signifies writings. And the Word of God is emphatically so called, because he has therein written to us the great things of his law and covenant. — Hos- viii. 12. A Testament is a writing or a voluntary act of a person be- queathing legacies on such as are mentioned by the testator, which can never take place until his death. — Heb. ix. 16. The writings of Moses and the prophets are called the Old or First Testament, because the Testament or -Covenant of Grace which God made with man, is ..therein revealed in the dispensa- tion of it, in which Christ, the testator and the old mediator of the covenant, is exhibited by types and figures ; and many bur- densome services and carnal ordinances ©f the ceremonial law were required. The writings of the evangelists and apostles are called the Neva or Second Testament, because the Testament of God or Covenant of Grace js therein revealed in the new dispensation of it, in which Christ being now come in tfye flesh, is revealed without types and figures ; and because he hath fulfilled and abolished the ceremonial law, and freed his people from that yoke of bond- age, — now requiring more spiritual vorship in its room. That the Scriptures are a revelation from heaven-, may be proved by arguments or evidences, both external and internal. 1. The external evidences, which prove that the Scriptures are the Word of God, are these : — Their superior antiquity — the good character of the sacred penmen — tbe miracles by which they have b*en confirmed — the exact fulfilment of the prophecies and predictions contained in them — the effects produced py them — the opposition they have sustained and surmounted — and their being prized and esteemed as such by the best of men. 2. The internal evidence, which prove that the Scriptures are 24 THE SCRIPTURES THE ONLY RULE OF FAITH AND DUTY. the Word of God, are these : — Their whole contents contradict nothing in nature or sound reason, but confirm every rational fact — many important truths are revealed in them which could not be discovered by nature or reason — the strict purity of their doctrines, duties, and precepts, and whole contents — the harmony of their various parts — their suitableness to our condition-Mine full and perfect discovery which they make of the only way of salvation — the majesty of their style — their power and efficacy to convince and awaken the conscience, to convert and change the heart, to quicken men out of spiritual death, and to rejoice and comfort under the deepest distress — their scope and design to give glory to God, and to debase the sinner — and the experience which real Christians possess of their truth. That neither men nor angels could be the authors of the Scrip- tures, will be evident from the following things : — 1. Good men could not be the authors of them, because they would often arro- gate to themselves what is infinitely above their power. 2. Bad men could not be the authors of them, because they could not write such language ; nor could they have any conception of that heavenly-mindedness which is everywhere discernible in them. 3. Good angels could not be the authors of them, because they could have no wish to deceive ; and because it is said that they desire to look into their mysteries ; and it cannot be supposed that they would write what they did not thoroughly understand. — 1 Pet. i. 12. 4. Bad angels could not be the authors of them, because they everywhere oppose the kingdom of Satan, and dis- cover the way in which it shall be finally overthrown. Obs. 6. — The Scriptures are the only rule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy God. The Scriptures are the only rule of faith and duty, because none but God, their author, could show the way in which he himself is to be glorified and enjoyed by fallen sinners of man- kind.— Micah vi. 6-9 ; Matt. xi. 25-28. This will be further evident when we consider, — 1. That they are a sufficient rule. The Scriptures alone are sufficient, without the aid or writings of men, to give us that knowledge of God and of his will, which is necessarv to salvation. —Gal. i. 8 ; John v. 39. 2. That they are a perfect rule. The whole counsel of God, concerning all things necessary for his own glory, man's salva- tion, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or may, by good and necessary consequence, be deduced from Scrip- ture. — 2 Tim. iii. 15-17 ; Gal. i. 8, 9. That not only express Scriptures, but also plain and necessary Scripture consequences, may be admitted as a part of the rule, is evident from the ex- ample of our Lord in proving the doctrine of the resurrection against the Sadducees. — Matt. xxii. 31, 32. THE SCRIPTURES THE ONLY RULE OF FAITH AND DUTY. 25 3. That they are a clear and perspicuous rale. There are in- deed some things in Scripture hard to be understood, because they have a reference to time and place ; and there are mysteries •which are beyond the comprehension of created beings. But to those who are under the enlightening influences of the Holy Spirit, the fundamental truths of the Gospel, with respect both to faith and practice, are plain and perspicuous. For every thing necessary to eternal salvation is so clearly laid down in Scripture, that every one who uses the ordinary means, may attain to a sufficient knowledge of them. The reason why God hath left some parts of his Word obscure and difficult to be understood, are the following : — 1. That we may be convinced that it is he alone who can make us understand the Scriptures ; and that prayer for the Spirit is necessary to open our understandings. 2. That the Scriptures may be our frequent study, if we would know the voice of God speaking therein. 3. That we may be kept humble ; and that we may be led to see and to acknowledge that the wisdom of man is but folly. 4. That we may highly esteem the Word, — which, were it all plain and easy to be understood, might be little esteemed. 5. That we may highly value the ministry of the Word, which God hath appointed in his Church, in order that its truths might be made known and inculcated. 6. That the world may see that it is not by the wisdom of man, but by the teaching of the Spirit of God, that sinners are made wise to salvation. The best interpreter of Scripture is Scripture itself; for it is evident that the Spirit of God must be the best interpreter of that which was dictated by him. — 1 Cor. ii. 11. Obs. 7. — Although the Scriptures are a sufficient, a perfect, and a clear and perspicuous rule of direction, yet they are not sufficient of themselies to make ?« icise to salvation. In order to this end, they must be accompanied with the al- mighty power of the Spirit of God; for without this the reading, and preaching of the Word would be in vain. — 1 Cor. ii. 14. If the teaching of the Holy Spirit were not necessary, it would fol- low: That such passages of Scripture as Isa. liv. 13, Jer. xxxi. 34, would be unnecessary, — to assert which would be the height* of blasphemy. That those who are most learned in the things of this world, would be best acquainted with the Scriptures; which, however, is not the case. — Mai. xi. 25; f Cor. i. 21. That were we able of ourselves to understand the things of God, the promise of the Spirit to open the eyes of the blind, would be to no purpose. That the prayers of the people of God for divine illumination (such as Ps. cxix. 18, &c.) would be in vain. Obs. 8 — The Scriptures were originally written in the Hebrew and Greek languages. The Old Testament, except a few passages which were written, c 26 THE TWO PRINCIPAL TOPICS TREATED OF IN SCRIPTURE. in Chaldee^ was originally written in Hebrew, the first language in the world, and, at the time of the revelation, the language best known to the Church of God. And the New Testament, with the exception of the Gospel according to Matthew, which is supposed to have been written in Hebrew, was originally writ- ten in Greek; the language which, at the time of writing it, was most common and best known both to Jews and Gentiles. By this we are taught that all nations should have the Scriptures in a language which they understand. The passages of the Old Testament which were written in Chaldee, are the eleventh verse of the tenth chapter of the Prophecies of Jeremiah • from the second verse of the fourth chapter of Daniel, to the end of the seventh chapter ; and the fourth, fifth, and sixth chapters of Ezra. INFERENCES. From chis subject we learn, — 1. The duty and necessity of searching the Scriptures, which are able, through the influence of the Holy Spirit, to make us wise to salvation. — John v. 39. 2. That we must believe that all things contained in them are the word of God. 3. That under a sense of our own ignorance, we should seek after a more extensive knowledge of the saving truths of the Scriptures, than we yet possess. 4. That the prac- tice of the Word must accompany the knowledge of it. — John xiii. 17. 5. The goodness of God in committing to us a revela- tion of his will. 6. The necessity of divine illumination, that we may see wondrous things out of the Scriptures. — Ps. cxix. 18. 7. That the Word of God is the only rule of faith and obe- dience ; and that it alone discovers the way by which we are to glorify him in this world, that we may come to the full enjoy- ment of him in a future world. The Two Principal Topics treated of in Scripture, and Ex- plained in the Two Divisions of the Catechism. (!§. 8. — TOjat &o tfye Scriptures prtnctpallp trari) ? The Scriptures principally teach, what man is to believe concerning God, and what duty God requires ©f man. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That the Scriptures teach us other things besides the know- ledge of God, and the duty and happiness of man. — See Matt, xxiii. 23. 2. That they principally teach us what we are to believe con- cerning God. Deut. xxxi. 12. — " That they may learn, and fear the Lord your God, and observe to do all t'ne words of this law." 2Tim.-i. 13. — "Hold fast the form of sound words,— in faith and love. 1 ' THE TWO PRINCIPAL TOPICS TREATED OF IN SCRIPTURE. 27 3. That they principally teach us what duty God requires of man. Ps. cxix. 105. — w Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. 1 ' See also Luke x. 25, 26. EXPLANATION. Obs. 9. — The Scriptures teach us what we are to believe con- cerning God. To believe, is to assent or give credit to truth, upon the autho- rity of another. To believe what the Scriptures teach, is to assent or give credit to the truths therein revealed, upon the authority of God, whose Word the Scriptures are. This is what constitutes divine faith ; and it is produced in the soul of man, not by any power of his own, but by the operation of the Spirit of God. — Gal. v. 22 ; Eph. ii. 8. The things which the Scriptures teach concerning God, and which are to be believed by us, respect his nature and perfections, the persons of the Godhead, the decrees of God, and the execution of his decrees. — Heb. xi. 6; 1 John v. 7; Acts xv. 14, 15-18, and iv. 27, 28. We are to believe nothing in point of faith but what the Scrip- tures teach ; because they are the only book in the world of divine authority, and consequently the only one that is absolutely infal- lible. — Isa. viii. 20. Obs. 10. — The ScHptures teach us what duty God requires of man. By the duty which God requires of man, we are to understand that which is God's due, or that which we owe to God, and are bound to do, as his creatures, his subjects, and his children. We are bound to do nothing in practice but what is required in the Scriptures ; because the laws and commandments of God, revealed therein, are so exceeding broad and extensive, reaching the thoughts and intents of the heart, as well as the actions of the life, that it is not lawful for us to do any thing but what is either directly or consequentially prescribed therein. — Isa. viii. 20 Obs. 11. — The Scriptures are said " principally'''' to teach what we are to believe and practise, because these things are most important, and absolutely necessary to salvation. Although all Scripture is the Word of God, and consequently all equally true, and no part of it undeserving our notice, yet all things in it are not equally important, nor equally connected with eternal salvation. Those things which man is bound to believe and do, as necessary to salvation, are the things which the Scrip- tures "principally teach. And we may observe, that although the Scriptures teach these things plainly, yet they must be ac- companied with the Spirit of Gou, who alone can teach them effectually to salvation. 28 THE TWO PRINCIPAL TOPICS TREATED OF IN SCRIPTURE. Obs. 12. — Faith or belief is the foundation of obedience. This is evident from the order in which they are here stated. Faith or belief is made the foundation of duty or obedience ; and not duty or obedience the foundation of faith : or, in other words, the things to be believed are set before the things to be practised. — Tit. iii. 8. And this is done for the following reason, viz. — that the order of things in the covenant of grace may be distinguished from their order in the covenant of works. Under the covenant of works, life was promised as the reward of perfect obedience. — Rom. x. 5. But under the covenant of grace, life is promised freely, and to be received freely ; and their obedience is to be yielded to the law, from gratitude and love. — Jer. xxxi. 18, 19. Hence, there can be no saving faith, which is not fol- lowed by obedience; and no acceptable obedience, which does not flow from faith. This order of doctrine is farther evinced from the method observed by the Apostle Paul, who informs us, that all true Gospel obedience is the obedience of faith. — Rom. xvi. 26. And accordingly, in his epistles, he first lays down the doctrines to be believed ; and then, on that foundation, he proceeds to inculcate the duties to be practised. This order does not make void the law, nor weaken our obli- gation to comply with its precepts. On the contrary, it estab- lishes the law, by settling our obligation to duty on its proper foundation. — Rom. iii. 31. When it is said, that, " In keeping of God's commandments there is great reward ;" and, " Verily there is a reward for the righteous," — we are to understand by reward, here and in similar passages, not a reward of debt, but a reward of grace. They who shall be rewarded, are believers in Christ. Their persons must first be accepted through union to him, before any of their works can be accepted by God as righteous. — Heb. xi. 6. See also Gen. iv. 4, last clause. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. That we ought to be much exercised in reading the Scriptures. 2. The necessity of prayer for the Spirit, who indited the Scriptures, and who alone can make us understand and practise them. 3. That the works of a man who is void of faith, are dead works; and consequently cannot please God. — Heb. xi. 6. 4. The necessity of being united to Christ by faith, as the branch is to the vine ; and of being built upon him as the foundation which God hath laid in Zion. PART FIRST. WHAT WE ARE TO BELIEVE CONCERNING GOD. CHAPTER I. CONCERNING GOD CONSIDERED IN HIMSELF, VIZ. I IN RESPECT OF HIS NATURE AND PERFECTIONS — HIS UNITY — AND THE TRINITY OF PERSONS IN THE GOD- HEAD. Nature and Perfections of God. CBi. 4 — SSUjat ts (SoD? God is a Spirit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable in his being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That God is a Spirit. John iv. 24.—" God is a Spirit." 2. That he is infinite in his being and perfections. Job xi. 7. - " Canst thou by searching find out God ? Canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection ? " 3. That he is eternal in his being and perfections. Ps. xc. 2. — M From everlasting to everlasting thou art God." 4. That he is unchangeable in his being and perfections. Mai. iii. 6. — " I am the Lord, I change not." See also James i. 17. 5. That he is infinitely wise. Ps. cxlvii. 5. — ** His understand- ing is infinite.'* 6. That he is 'infinitely powerful. Job. xlii. 2. — "I know that thou canst do every thing." See also Rev. iv. 8. 7. That he is infinitely holy. Rev. xv. 4. — " O Lord — thou only art holy." 8. That he is infinitely just. Deut. xxxii. 4. — " A (iod — without iniquity ; just and right is he." See also Zeph. iii. 5. 9. That he is infinitely good and merciful. Exod. xxxiv. 6. ' — " The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-suffer- ing, and abundant in goodness and truth." c2 80 NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 10. That he is infinite in truth. Deut. xxxii. 4. — "A God of truth, and without iniquity ; just and right is he." EXPLANATION. Ohs. 13. — The first point of religion taught in the Scriptures is, the existence of God. — Heb. xi. 6. The existence of God cannot he denied, without at the same time denying our own existence, and that of every thing around us. The existence of God may be proved, — I. From the works of creation. — Psal. xix. 1, and c. 3. 2. From the preservation of all things, and the regular government of the world. Gen. viii. 22. 3. From the existence of conscience within us, and also from the visible judgments inflicted on the wicked at death, besides the check of conscience. 4. From the wonderful de- liverances wrought for the Church in all ages. 5. From the consent of all nations. Whatever is consented to by all man- kind, must be a dictate of nature, and, consequently, a truth. 6. From the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. 7. From the accomplishment of prophecy, and from God's frequently revealing himself to the sons of men, as Noah, Abraham, Moses, &c. Obs. 14. There are various names and titles by which God is hnown in Scripture. Of these, the following are a few : — 1. Al, which expresses the omnipresence of God, — that is, the universal extension of his power and knowledge. — Gen. xvii. 1. 2. Alehim, which exhibits him as the real, proper, and only object of worship and praise. — Gen. i. 1. 3. Shaddai, which denotes him to be almighty and all-suffi- cient. — Gen. xvii. 1 ; Exod. vi. 3. 4. Adon, which represents him as the Lord and Judge of all. — Ps. ex. 1. 5. Jah, which expresses his self-existence, — his having ex- istence in himself, and his giving it to all other beings. — Isa. xxvi. 4. 6. Jehovah, which denotes his self-existence, independence, unsuccessive or immutable eternity ; and his accomplishing the promises which he hath made. 7. Ehieh, " I am," or "I will be what I will be"— denot- ing his absolute independence and immutable eternity. — Exod. iii. 14. 8. Kurios and Theos, the former denoting his self- existence, and his governing power over all things, and the latter represent- ing him as the Maker and Observer of all things. God is also known in Scripture in several other ways : — NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 31 1. He is represented by a variety of terms, such as, a rock, a fortress, a buckler, a sun, a shield, &c. These are figurative expressions, and represent what God is to his people, or those who trust in him. 2. He is exhibited by a variety of names, having a relation to him, — as, the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ — The Father of Mercies — The God of Peace — -The God of Grace — The God of "Patience — The God of Consolation — The God of Hope — The God of Salvation, &c. &c. Obs. 15. — God is a Spirit. A Spirit is an immortal, an immaterial, a thinking, and an eternal substance. God is a Spirit, — that is, he is a being or substance, invisible, immaterial, incorruptible, incorporeal, infinite, eternal, immut- able, uncreated, &c. — Exod. xxxiii. 20; John i. 18, iv. 24, v. 37, vi. 46; Col. i. 15 ; Tim. i. 17, vi. 16. The spirituality of God, and that of angels and souls of men, differ in the following respects : — Angels and souls of men are created spirits, and can be reduced to their original non-existence ; but God is an uncreated Spirit : they are finite; but God is in- finite : they are dependent ; but God is independent. Although we find that bodily parts or members (such as eyes, ears, hands, &c), and passions or affections (such as desire, hope, love, anger, joy, grief, &c), are ascribed to God in Scrip- ture, — yet these are only emblems of his spiritual perfections and acts, used in condescension to human weakness. They are as- cribed to him, not properly, but figuratively. Thus, when eyes and ears are ascribed to God, they denote his omniscience ; hands denote his power ; and his face, the manifestation of his favour, — and so of the rest. All the knowledge which it is possible for us to attain in this world respecting God as a Spirit, may be acquired in the follow- ing manner: — 1. By removing from him every imperfection which is found in ourselves, we obtain the knowledge of God in those attributes which cannot, in the least degree, be found in created beings, — such as, self-existence, independence, infinity, unsuccessive eternity, immutability, &c. 2. By ascribing to him, in the greatest possible measure and degree, whatever ex- cellence is found in the creature, we obtain the knowledge of God in those attributes which are just visible in the creatures, — such as, knowledge, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth. Obs. 16. — The attributes or perfections of God are commonly distinguished into communicable and incommunicable, or imit- able and inimitable. 1. The incommunicable attributes of God are, his infinity. 32 NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. eternity, and unchangeableness ; and they are so called, because no trace of them is to be found in the creatures. 2. The communicable attributes of God are, his being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth ; and they are so called, because some faint but imperfect resemblance of them is to be found among the creatures. Although we, on account of our weakness and imperfection, must speak and think of the divine attributes or perfections separately, yet we must ever remember, that they are neither distinct from God himself, or the divine essence, nor separable from one another ; but that they are altogether the one infinite perfection of the divine nature. Obs. 17. — God is infinite in his being and perfections. The infinity of God is that essential perfection of his nature, by which all things in his essence or being are known to be with- out measure and quantity. And hence his being and perfections are incomprehensible. God is infinite in respect of his being ; for our finite under- standings can form no adequate concej>tion of his nature. He is also infinite in respect of all his glorious perfections, — wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth. — Rom. xi. 33 ; Job xxvi. 14, and xlii. 2; Isa. vi. 3; Rev. iv. 18, and xv. 4; Deut. xxxii. 4 ; Rev. xv. 31 ; 1 Chron. xvi. 34 ; Exod. xxxiv. 6 ; Ps. cxlv. 9 ; Numb, xxiii. 19 ; Deut. vii. 9 ; Ps. cxix. 89, 90, and cxlvi. 6. In the infinity of God are included the following things : — 1. His incomprehensibility $ or his infinitely transcending the utmost or most enlarged capacity of angels and of men, with re- spect to his essence, or being and perfections. — Ps. cxlv. 3; Job xxxvi. 26. 2. His immensity ; or that perfection of his nature, by which he is wherever any space or any creature can be. And hence it includes, — 3. His omnipresence ; or that perfection of his nature, by which he is most intimately present with all. his creatures in every place ; and fills all places at once — heaven, and earth, and hell — with his essential presence. — 1 Kings viii. 27. Although God is essentially present every where, yet he mani- fests his presence in a peculiar manner in heaven. He is also peculiarly present with his Church on earth, in the institutions and ordinances of his appointment. — Matt, xviii. 20. With his saints, by his Spirit dwelling in them, and manifesting to them his gracious favour and support. — Eph. ii. 22. And with the Church invisible above, by the bright, and glorious, and immedi- ate displays of his goodness and excellencies. We may here observe, that he is also present in hell, where he displays his awful and tremendous power and justice on devils and wicked men, whom he preserves in endless existence, that they may endure the effects of his wrath for ever. — Matt. xxv. 46. NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 33 Obs. 18. — God is eternal in his being and perfections. The eternity of God is that perfection of his nature by which he continually exists, without beginning or end, or succession of duration. — Ps. xc. 2, cii. 12-27, and xc. 4 ; 2 Pet. iii. 8. God is said in Scripture to be eternal, because he had no be- ginning, and is the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever ; and also, because he is the author of eternal duration to others. The eternity of God, and that of angels and souls of men, differ in the following respects : — The eternity of angels and souls of men means only, that they shall have no end ; but the eternity of God means, that he had no beginning, that he has no succes- sion, and that he shall have no end. The eternity of angels and spirits is neither essential, nor absolute, nor independent; but the eternity of God is both essential, and absolute, and indepen- dent.— Ps. xc. 2-4, and cii. 27 ; 2 Pet. iii. 8. Obs. 19. — God is unchangeable in his being and perfections. The unchangeableness or immutability of God is that attribute of his nature by which it is impossible for him to undergo the least possible change, but continues always the same. This perfection of God may be proved both from reason and from Scripture. 1. Reason informs us, that, were God change- able, the change must be either for the better or for the worse. But from each of these suppositions an absurdity arises. If the change were to the better, it would be inconsistent with the per- fection of God, who sees the end from the beginning, and all whose works are done in consummate wisdom. If it were to the worse, it would also derogate from his perfection, inasmuch as it would indicate, that he did not know from eternity what would take place in time ; to assert which would be the same as to deny his existence. 2. This perfection is proved from Scripture by these and many other passages : Numb, xxiii. 19 ; 1 Sam. xv. 29 ; Isa. xlvi. 10 ; Mai. iii. 6 ; Heb. vi. 17, 18 ; James i. 17. God is unchangeable, — 1. In his existence. He cannot cease to be. — 1 Tim. i. 17, and vi. 16. 2. In his nature or essence. He cannot cease to be what he is in every perfection. 3. In his purposes. — Isa. xlvi. 10, and xiv. 24. 4. In his promises to his people; in his threatenings against the wicked; and in all his predictions. — Numb, xxiii. 19. 5. In his duration. — Ps. cii. 27. Although angels and glorified spirits are unchangeable, as well as God ; yet their unchangeableness differs from his in this re- spect, — that they receive it from him, and have it not in their own nature. It is said, indeed, in several passages of Scripture (such as Gen. vi. 6 ; Jonah iii. 10 ; and 1 Sam. xv. 11) that God repents ; but by repentance, in these and similar passages, we are to under- stand only an alteration of the outward dispensations of his pro- 34 NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. vidence, according to his knowledge of all things in every relation and circumstance respecting them. We are by no meany io attribute to him any change of mind; for in this respect it is impossible for God to change. — Job xxiii. 13. Every, change which the Scriptures attribute to him, is in reality a change only in the creatures. Obs. 20, — God alone is infinite, eternal, and unchangeable in his being. The being or essence of God is his glorious and transcendent nature, by which he is what he is — infinitely blessed in himself, and comprehended by none but himself ; for finitude cannot com- prehend infinitude. The highest perfection of being is that which can neither be increased nor diminished, and which is independent of any other being whatever. — Job xxxv. 6-8. Being, in this proper and strict sense of the word, can be as- cribed to none but to God alone ; for although the heavens and the earth, and angels and men, have a being, yet there is no infinite, eternal, and unchangeable being but God. He alone can say, " I am that I am." — Exod. iii. 14. Obs. 21. — God is infinitely wise. The wisdom of God is that attribute or perfection of his nature, by which he perfectly knows himself, and all things which have been, which are, and which shall be, or can possibly be, together with the reasons of them. In the wisdom of God are included, — 1. His knowledge, or omniscience, or that perfection of his nature by which he discovers objects, or by which he knows all things. — Prov. xv. 3; Gen. vi. 5. 2. His wisdom, properly so called, or that perfection of his nature by which he directs all things to the best ends, and to the very ends for which he gave them existence. — Acts xv. 18. We may here observe, that God knows things, not as man knows them, by succession of ideas, but by one single intuitive glance, distinctly, comprehensively, in every circumstance re- specting them, and infallibly. The wisdom of God appears, — 1. In the works of creation : in the beautiful order and variety of all things. — Ps. civ. 24 and cxxxvi. 5; Prov. iii. 19. 2. In the works of providence: in upholding all things in being ; and in so ordering them as to ful- fil all his pleasure. 3. In the work of redemption ; both in its contrivance, its accomplishment, and its application. Obs. 22.— God is infinitely powerful. The power of God is that perfection of his nature by which he is able to effect all things, or do whatever he willeth or can will ; or by which he can do what seemeth good unto him, in heaven, NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 35 on earth, in hell, in the seas, and in all deep places. — Ps. cxxxv. 6; Dan. iv. 35. t. t In Scripture, the power is expressed, — 1. Positively. — Ps. lxii. 11 • Gen. xvii. 1 ; Job xlii. 2, ix. 4, xxxvii. 23; Ps. xxxv. 10. 2. Negatively ; or by removing from him all imperfection in power, or air weakness. — Gen. xviii. 14; Jer. xxxii. 17; Luke i. 37. 3. Metaphorically; by his arm, — Ps. xcviii. 1; right hand, — Ps. lxiii. 8 ; stretched-out arm, — Exod. vi. 6 ; arm of strength, — Isa. lxii. 8 ; and glorious arm, — Isa. lxiii. 12, &c. The power of God is displayed, — 1. In the creation of the world, and of all things in it. — Rom. i. 20 ; Ps. xxxiii. 9. 2. In providence.— Col. i. 17; Heb. i. 3; Ps. lxxvi. 10. And here we may observe, that God's power has been displayed in erecting a Church in the world, and in preserving it, notwith- standing all the persecutions and sufferings to which it has been subjected. 3. In the work of redemption by Jesus Christ ; in his incarnation ; in the miraculous union of his two natures in one person ; in the numerous miracles which he performed ; in supporting his human nature under that load of wrath which was due to us for our transgressions ; and in raising him from the dead. 4. In the conviction and conversion of sinners, — for it requires the same power to raise a sinner, dead in sins, to spiritual life, that it required to raise Christ from the dead ; and in pre- serving the graces of his people amidst all the afflictions' and temptations to which they are exposed. — 1 Pet. i. 5. We may here also observe, that, although there are some things which God can neither will nor do, yet this implies no imperfec- tion in his power. He cannot do such things as are contrary to his nature ; as to cease to exist, or to destroy himself. He can neither will nor do such things as imply weakness or imperfec- tion; as to lie, or to deny himself. — -Tit. i. 12; 2 Tim. ii. 13. He cannot do such things as imply a contradiction. Obs. 23. — God is infinitely holy. The holiness of God is that essential perfection of his nature by which he contemplates the untainted purity of hi3 essence, and delights in it ; loves righteousness, and hates evil, as that exceeding sinful thing which his soul abhorreth. This perfection of Deity is largely exhibited in Scripture : for every thing relating to God is called holy. Holiness is ascribed to each of the persons in the Godhead ; and the third person is frequently called the Holy Ghost, or the Holy Spirit. — John xvii. 11; Ps. xvi. 10. Heaven is called God's holy habitation, and the habitation of his Holiness. — Deut. xxvi. 15; Isa. lxiii. 15. The Sabbath is called holy. — Exod. xvi. 23, and xxxi. 14. The Church is called holy, under different terms ; as the Holy Sanc- tuary, — Lev. xvi. 33 ; the Holy House. — Lev. xxvii. 14. God's people are called holy. — Dan. xii. 7. His angels are called holy. 36 NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. — Matt. xxv. 31. His ministers are called holy. — 2 Pet. i. 21. And many other things relating to God are called holy. — Ps. xiv. 5, 17 ; 1 Sam. ii. 2. We may here observe, that God puts a peculiar honour upon his holiness ; for he singles it out as that attribute by -which he swears, that he will accomplish whatever he hath spoken.— Ps. lxxxix. 35 ; Amos iv. 2. The holiness of God appears, — 1. In the works of creation. Every creature capable of holiness was made perfectly holy. Angels were made holy, and man was made holy. — Gen. i. 2/ ; Eccl. vii. 29. 2. In his works of providence : in casting the angels that sinned out of heaven ; in thrusting man out of para- dise, when he rebelled against him ; in the destruction of the old world by water, and of Sodom and Gomorrah by fire and brim- stone ; in the punishments inflicted on the Israelites in the wil- derness, and in the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans ; and in his conduct towards his own people, when they transgress his just and holy commandments. 3. In his Word, or in the Scriptures, which are called the Holy Scriptures. — Rom. i. 2. His Word is holy in its commands, in its promises, and in its threatenings. — Ps. cv. 42; 2 Pet. i. 4. 4. In the work of re- demption. All the instances which God hath given of his hatred at sin, are nothing when compared with the display which he hath given of his holiness in the sufferings and death of his only Son, who was his delight from everlasting ! Obs. 24. — God is infinitely just. The justice of God is that perfection of his nature by which he is infinitely righteous in himself, and just in all his works and ways towards all the creatures which he hath made. The justice of God is exhibited in Scripture, — 1. Positively; when God is expressly called just. — Deut. xxxii. 4 ; Isa. xlv. 21; Acts vii. 52. 2. Negatively; when injustice of every kind, and in every degree, is removed from him. — Rom. iii. 5 ; Deut. xxxii. 4; Heb. i. 10; Ps. xcii. 15. 3. This perfection is also exhibited when he is said to render to every man according to his works, &c. — Deut. vi. 30 ; Job xxxiii. 26 ; Jer. xvii. 10, &c. The justice of God has been distinguished into various kinds ; such as his legislative justice, his distributive justice, his remu- nerative justice, and his vindictive justice : according to the various ways which he adopts in executing it. 1. God's legislative justice is his giving just laws to the rational creation, by which it is bound to obey and to submit to his will in all things. 2. God's distributive justice is his constant will and purpose to render to rational creatures their due, according to law, with- out respect of persons. — Job xxxiv. 11 ; 1 Pet. i. 17. 3. God's remunerative justice is his rewarding the sincere NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 37 though imperfect obedience of his people to the law, as a rule of life, with the enjoyment of himself in glory. But then this reward is entirely of free grace, and not of debt. It is not on account of any worthiness in their obedience, but only on account of what Christ has merited by his obedience and sufferings. — Heb. v. 9; 1 Tim. iv. 8; Ps. lviii. 11; Ps. xix. 11; Rom. iv. 4, 5 ; Ps. cxv. 1 ; 1 Pet. ii. 5. 4. God's vindictive justice is his punishing sin in the sinner, and taking vengeance on all those who disobey his holy and just commandments. The justice of God is displayed in various ways. 1. It is dis- played in providence : in the judgments which he executeth. — > Ps. ix. 16. 2. It was displayed in a very striking manner in the sufferings and death of the Lord Jesus Christ. God cannot, in consistency with his perfections, and he will not, pardon sin without a satisfaction. 3. It shall be signally displayed at the general judgment ; for he hath appointed a day in which he will judge the world " in righteousness." — Acts xvii. 31. 4. It shall ue signally displayed in the everlasting punishment of fallen spi- rits, and of sinners of mankind condemned at the last day. — Jude 6 ; 2 Pet. ii. 4. Obs. 25. — God is infinitely good and merciful. The goodness of God is that perfection of his nature by which he is infinitely good in himself, and bestows on all his creatures what they can receive of his goodness in this world. — Ps. cxlv. 9, and cxxxvi. 1. The goodness of God is commonly distinguished into absolute and relative. 1. His absolute goodness is that essential goodness of his nature which can be imparted to none. 2. His relative goodness is that which he bestows upon his creatures. In Scripture the goodness of God is distinguished by different names, according to the manner in which, and the objects about which, it is exercised. As it inclines him to promote the happi- ness of his creatures, and to delight in them, it is called love. As it inclines him to supply their wants, which he is not bound to do, it is called bounty. — Ps. cxvi. 7. As it inclines him to mani- fest himself to the undeserving, or to those who deserve nothing but what is evil, it is called grace. — Rom. iii. 24. As it inclines him not to execute judgment immediately on the sinner, but to forbear for a time, it is called pa'ience or long-suffering. — Exod. xxxiv. 6 ; 2 Pet. iii. 9 ; 1 Pet. iii. 20, &c. The goodness of God is displayed, — 1. In the works of crea- tion : in giving being to so many things, of which he stood in no need, and without which he was infinitely happy. But especially in the creation of man : in making him for his worship and ser- vice in this world, and for the enjoyment of him in the world to come. 2. In the works of providence : in respect of which it is D 38 NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. either common or special. The common goodness of God is that which he hestows on all his creatures, rational and irrational, without distinction. — Ps. xxxiii. 5, and xxxvi. 6 ; Matt. v. 45. His s-pecia I goodness is that which he manifests to a certain num- ber of lost mankind in their redemption through Jesus Christ. — John iii. 16, and xv. 13. 3. The goodness of God will be dis- played in a glorious manner at the " day of final retribution/' — Ps. xxxi. 19 ; Matt. xxv. 34 ; 1 Cor. ii. 9. Obs. 26. — God is infinitely true and faithful. The truth or faithfulness of God is that perfection of his nature by which he is true in himself, and by which it is impossible for him not to fulfil whatever he hath promised, or not to bring to pass whatever he hath purposed. — Deut. xxxii. 4 ; Exod. xxxi v. 6. We may here observe, that this perfection of God has respect chiefly to the revelation of his will in the Scriptures. — 'Matt. v. 18. The truth of God is displayed, — 1. In his works of providence. No providential act which strikes the observation of a number of mankind, takes place in the world, but what is founded on the declarations of his Word. — Gen. viii. 22; Ps. xxv. 10, and cxi. 7--9. 2. In his Word ; both in its promises and in its threaten- ings. — Matt. xxiv. 35 ; 1 Kings viii. 56 ; Numb, xxiii. 19 ; Isa. xlvi. 11; Jer. iv. 28; 2 Sam. vii. 28; Isa. xxv. 1; Ezek. xii. 25; Heb. x. 23, and xi. 11; 2 Cor. i. 20. 3. The truth and faithfulness of God will be fully manifested at the last judgment. All his promises to his people in this world, and all his threaten- ings against the wicked, shall be, as it were, concentred here. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn the following things : — From the spirituality of God we learn. — 1. The necessity of worshipping bjm in spirit and in truth. 2. That we ought to speak of God with reverence. 3. The sinfulness of forming any repre- sentation of him, either externally or internally. 4. That God alone can be the chief good of our souls, w r hich are spirits. From the infinity of God, and the attributes included in it, we learn, — 1. That no affliction or temptation can befall the righte- ous without his knowledge and sympathy. 2. That God is well acquainted with the most secret retirements of the sinner. 3. That if the sinner continue to go on in his sins, God will be present with him in the place of everlasting punishment, displaying his awful justice for ever. From the eternity of God we learn, — 1. That the righteous have reason to rejoice, because their God liveth and reigneth for evermore. 2. That the wicked have great reason to tremble. Eternity is a word which will break the hearts of sinners in that place which mercy never enters. From the unchangeableness of God we learn, — 1. That it is a NATURE AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD. 39 source of strong consolation to the righteous, that God rests in his love; that whom he loveth, he loveth to the end. 2. What terror the consideration of the unchangeable purpose of God con- cerning the wicked may cause to arise in their minds. From the being of God we learn, — 1. That he will assuredly accomplish all his purposes to his people. 2. The necessity of an interest in this God, whose name is " I am," and who re- maineth unchangeably the same. From the wisdom of God we learn, — 1 . That no evil can be- fall the righteous which shall not work for their spiritual good. — Job v. l3 ; Rom. viii. 28. 2. That God is acquainted with the thoughts of the heart, and with the secret wickedness of the sinner, although concealed from the world. — Heb. iv. 13. 3. The necessity of worshipping God in spirit and in truth ; seeing he knows whether our hearts are right in his sight or not. 4. Gra- titude to God for the wonderful display of his wisdom in the plan of redemption. From the power of God we learn, — 1. That he will perform whatever he hath promised. 2. That the people of God ought to trust in him in the greatest difficulties. 3. To learn to do well ; to cease to do evil : God is able to save ; he has power to destroy. 4. That sinners ought to take warning to flee from the wrath to come. — Job ix. 4. 5. To beware of abusing the power of God, by "limiting the Holy One of Israel." — Ps. Ixxviii. 19-41. From the holiness of God w© learn, — 1. The contrariety of sin to his spotless nature. 2. The danger to which they expose themselves, who are strangers to holiness, or who love the ways of sin. 3. The necessity of evangelical holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord. — 2 Cor. vi. 17. 4. The necessity of hating sin with a perfect hatred, of walking in the ways of God, and of obeying his commandments. 5. The necessity of an in- terest in Jesus Christ, in whose righteousness alone we can stand with confidence before God. From the justice of God we learn, — 1. That we ought to acknow- ledge his ways towards us to be faithfulness and truth. 2. That he will not allow sin to pass with impunity. 3. The danger of impenitence. 4. The truth of the general judgment. 5. That we ought to endeavour to imitate God in justice. — Mic. vi. 8 Matt. xxii. 21. From the goodness of God we learn, — 1: That God alone ia the portion of the soul. 2. To beware of abusing his goodness. 3. Gratitude to him for the goodness which he bestows upon ug 4. To be resigned to every dispensation of his providence. 5. That we ought to imitate God in this perfection. From the truth of God we learn, — 1. That we have most sune ground to believe, that what God hath said shall be accomplished, z. That secure and careless sinners have reason to be afraid- 40 UNITY OF GOD. 3. To beware of hypocrisy in the worship of God, and of deceit- fulness in our dealings in the world. 4. That we ought to imitate God in this imitable perfection. — Mic. vi. 8. From the whole we learn, — 1. That the perfections of God are a source of unspeakable comfort to his people, and of in- describable terror to the wicked. 2. That we ought more and more to seek after the knowledge of God as he hath revealed himself in his Word and in his Son Jesus Christ ; seeing it is life eternal to know God and his Son whom he hath sent. — John xvii. 3. Unity of God, <&, 5.— &re ttyxe more €)oos tijatt <®VLt ? There is but one God only, the living and true God. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That there is but one God. 1 Cor. viii. 4. — " There is none other God but one." See also Deut. vi. 4. 2. That he is the only living and true God. Jer. x. 10. — " The Lord is the true God ; he is the living God ; and an ever- lasting King." EXPLANATION. Obs. 27. — There is but one God. This may be proved both from Scripture and reason : — 1. It is proved from Scripture positively or affirmatively when the Scriptures expressly declare that there is but one God, — Deut. vi. 4 ; Gal. iii. 20 ; Ps. lxxxvi. 10 ; 1 Cor. viii. 6 : and negatively, when they declare that there are no other gods but one. — Deut. xxxii. '69 ; Isa. xliii. 10, xliv. 6-8, and xlv. 5, G. It is also evident from the command in Scripture to, worship one God only. — Matt. iv. 10. If it were possible that there could be two gods, we could not love both supremely : our love must be divided; and our hearts could not be given to God, according to his commands. 2. Reason informs us, that there is but one cause and ultimate end of all things ; and that there cannot be two infinite, eternal, omnipotent, and self-existent beings. If it were possible that there could be more gods than one, no reason can be assigned why there should not be a million of gods, or as many as there are sands upon the sea- shore. Obs. 28. God is the living and true God. 1. God is called the living God, — (1.) In opposition to every thing else that is called Uod. (*J.) because iie is self- existent, UNITY OF GOD. 41 and the author of all natural, spiritual, and eternal life. — Acts xvii. 28 ; Eph. ii. 2 ; Col. iii. 3, 4. 2. God is called the true God, to distinguish him from false gods. The meaning of the epithet true in this place is, that God really exists; that he exists in truth, and not in imagination only ; that of him it cannot be said, as of idols, that he is no God ; hut that he is the only true God, besides whom there is and can be none else. The epithets living and true are here connected, because they are inseparably united in the nature of God. He who is the living God is the only true God ; and he who is the only true God is the only living God. — 1 Thess. i. 9. In Scripture there are others that are called gods, besides the living and true God. — 1 Cor. viii. 5. Moses is called a god to Pharaoh, because he was sent to him by the living God, to fulfil his pleasure respecting him ; and because he was the instrument of doing what no created being could overturn. — Exod. vii. 1. Magistrates are called gods, because they act in God's name in this world, and because we are bound to obey them. — Ps. lxxxii. 6 ; Rom. xiii. 2. Idols are called gods, because idolaters think that they are gods, and worship them as such. The belly is called a god, because some regard it more than they regard God. — Phil. iii. 19. And the Devil himself is called the god of this world, because of that power which is given him in the world by the living and true God, over the wicked and the children of disobedience. — 2 Cor. iv. 4. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. That it is dangerous to hasten after other gods. — Ps. xvi. 4. 2. That, seeing there is but one God, our prayers must be directed to him alone. 3. That we ought to love him above all. — Ps. lxxiii. 25. 4. 'that we have reason to bless God, that our lot is cast in a land of light, where we hear of the only living and true God. 5. That, seeing God is the living God, his people may rejoice, because he abideth with them for evermore. 6'. That we ought to present our bodies living sacrifices, holy and acceptable to him ; which is our reason- able service. — Rom. xii. 1. Seeing God hath given us life, it is but reasonable that it should be devoted to him. 7. That, see- ing God is the only true God, we ought to worship him in spirit and in truth ; for he desires truth in the inward parts, and de- lights in spiritual worship. 8. That we ought to beware of athe- istical sentiments ; of denying God in heart or life ; and of such opinions -as lead to Atheism, and to the casting off all fear of God. P2 42 TRINITY OF PERSONS IN THE GODHEAD. Trinity of Persons in the Godhead. CBl 6.— ^oto manp pmons are tfjrr* in tfje erson, to apply the purchased redemption, who likewise must >e infinite ; because such things belong to this part of redemption as can be ascribed to none but to God. Obs. 31. — The Three Persons in the Godhead are distinguished by their personal properties, which are incommunicable. 1. The personal property of the Father is to beget the Son. — Ps. ii. 7 ; Heb. i. 5, &c. 2. The personal property of the Son is to be begotten of the Father.— John i. 14, 18. 3. The personal property of the Holy Ghost is to proceed eter- nally from the Father and the Son. — John xv. *26; Gal. iv. 6; Bom. viii. 9; John xvi. 14, 15, xv. 26, and xiv. 26. The difference between a personal property and an essential property is this : — A personal property is peculiar to one of the persons only ; whereas an essential property is common to them all. TRINITY OF PERSONS IN THE GODHEAD. 45 It is further evident, that the Three Persons in the Godhead are distinct persons, from their distinct operations in the work of redemption. In Scripture, we find the Father contriving and ordaining it, the Son purchasing its blessings, and the Holy Ghost applying them. The calling of the Father the first, the Son the second, and the Holy Ghost the third person in the Godhead, does not imply any inequality among them ; for these are only terms of order, and imply no superiority either of nature, or exoellence, or duration. See 2 Cor. xiii. 4, where the Son is mentioned before the Father ; and Rev. i. 4, 5, where the Holy Spirit is named before the Son. We may here remark, that the assertion that there are Three Persons in the Godhead with distinct personal properties, does not in the least infer any separation or division in the^ divine essence ; for the Persons in the Godhead are not separated, but distinguished from one another by their personal properties. As the unity of the essence does not confound the Persons, so the distinction of Persons does not imply any division of the essence. Obs. 32. — The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. That the Father is God, is evident from the following things : — 1. In Scripture, all the perfections already considered, which necessarily belong to God, are ascribed to him. — John v. 26 ; Rom. i. 4, &c. 2. Works are ascribed to him which can be ascribed to none but God. 3. That worship is performed to him which it would be gross idolatry to offer to any created being. — John xi. 41, 42, and xii. 27, 28, &c. That the Son is God, is evident from the following things : — 1. He is expressly called God. — Rom. ix. 5. The true God and eternal life. — 1 John v. 20. The great God. — Tit. ii. 13. The mighty God. — Isa. ix. 6. The Lord or Jehovah, — Mai. iii. 1 ; which is the incommunicable name of God. 2. He is represented as possessed of Divine attributes. Eter- nity is ascribed to him. — Mic. v. 2. Immutability. — Heb. xiii. 8. Omniscience. — John xxi. 17. Omnipotence. — Rev. i. 8. Omni- presence. — Matt, xxviii. 20. Supremacy. — Rom. ix. 5. See also Rev. i. 11; Phil. iii. 20, 21 ; Rev. i. 32; Ps. cii. 27; Heb. i. 10, and xiii. 8. 3. Works peculiar to God are ascribed to him. The creation and preservation of all things. — Col. i. 16, 17. The purchasing of eternal redemption. — Heb. ix. 12. The working of miracles by his own power. — Mark v. 41. The forgiveness of sins. — ■ Mark ii. 5. The raising of the dead at the last day. — John v. 28, 29. The judging of the world.— Rom. xiv. 10. 46 TRINITY OF PERSONS IN THE GODHEAD. 4. We are commanded to give the same divine worship to him which is due to the Father. — John v. 23. To believe on him equally with the Father. — John xiv. 1. And to be baptized in his name, as well as in the name of the Father. — Matt, xxviii. 19. See also 1 Cor. xvi. 22 ; Heb. i. 8 ; Phil. ii. 10. We may here observe, that when Christ saith that " his Father is greater than he" (John xiv. 28), he does not mean that he is greater with respect to his nature, but with respect to his office as Mediator ; in which respect he is the Father's servant. — Isa. xlii. 1. That the Roly Ghost is God, is evident from the following things : — 1. Names peculiar to the Most High God are ascribed to him. He is expressly called Jehovah. — Numb. xii. 6. See also 1 Pet. i. 11 ; 2 Pet. i. 21. He is called God.— Acts v. 3, ,4. The Most High God. — Ps. lxxviii. 5b' } compared with Heb. iii. 2. Attributes peculiar to the Most High fxod are ascribed to him. Eternity is ascribed to him. — Gen. i. 1,2. Omnipresence. — Ps. cxxxix. 7. Omniscience. — 1 Cor. ii. 10, 11. Almighty power. — Acts vi. 10, &c. 3. Works peculiar to God alone are ascribed to him. — Gen. i. 2; Ps. xxxiii. 6, and civ. 30; Matt. xii. 28; Rom. viii. 11. 4. Worship peculiar to God alone is ascribed to him, and re- quired to be paid to him. In his name, as well as in the name of the Father and the Son, are we baptized. Prayer is com- manded to be performed to him. — Acts iv. 23, &c, compared with 2 Sam. xxiii. 2, &c. And solemn benedictions are pro- nounced in his name. — 2 Cor. xiii. 14. Obs. 33.— i-The belief of the doctrine of the Trinity is absolutely necessary to eternal salvation. Without the knowledge and belief of this doctrine, we can have no real knowledge of the new covenant, in which the Three Persons in the Godhead have such a conspicuous place. This doctrine runs through the whole of religion ; so that, if we believe not in it, we can have no saving faith, no saving acquaintance with God. — John xvii. 3, v. 23, and xv. 23. This doctrine likewise affects the whole of our obedience ; and all our comforts, both of a temporal and of a spiritual nature, flow from it. -Believers hold communion with God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost ; — with the Father, in contemplating the love which he hath displayed in sending his Son into the world to be a propitiation for their sins, and in admiring the riches of his grace, who thought upon them in their low estate ; — with the Son, in what he hath done for them in the various offices which he executes, in every relation in which he stands to them, and in which they appropriate him ; — and with the Holy Ghost, in NATURE AND CHARACTER OF GOD'S DECREES. 47 his various gifts and graces, influences and operations, which are all suited to their every case. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. That we must worship the Father, in Christ the Son, by the Holy Spirit ; and that y when we pray, we must ask the Father, in the name of the Son, by the Holy Spirit. — Eph. ii. 18, and v. 20. 2. To prize the Word of God, from which alone we can discover the doctrine of the Trinity, and which alone must be the rule of our faith. 3. What ought to be the portion of the soul — a Three-One God, with whom alone is salvation. CHAPTER II. CONCERNING GOD'S DOINGS WITH RESPECT TO HIS CREATURES : UNDER WHICH ARE CONSIDERED THE NATURE AND CHARACTER OF GOD'S DECREES, AND THE EXECUTION OF THEM IN THE WORKS OF CREA- TION AND PROVIDENCE. SECT. I.— OF THE NATURE AND CHARACTER OF GOD's DECREES. & 7.— 08$*i are tlje teroea of 1 ; Prov. iii. 19 ; Job xxvi. 7 ; Col. i. 16 ; Neh. ix. 6 ; Ps. lxxxix. 11 ; Isa. xxxiv. 1 ; Ps. xxxiii. 6 ; Heb. iii. 4. The world cannot be eternal, as some suppose ; for then it would be necessarily existent, and not liable to any possible change. But experience and daily observation teach us, that the world is undergoing many alterations ; IDfi we know assuredly that it has already undergone many ; which shows that it is not eternal. Neither angels nor men could have created the world ; nor could it have formed itself. For, 1. Angels and men were creat- ed themselves ; and creation being -a work of almighty power, no creature can give being to another". 2. The world is a crea- ture ; and, consequently, had the world formed itself, it would have been both creature and creator, which is a gross absurdity. Although God created all things, yet he did not create sin. He CREATION OF THE WORLD. 53 permitted it to take place for wise ends, but it cannot be said that he produced sin as such. God made angels and men upright, but they made themselves devils and sinners. That all things were made of nothing is evident, because they are said to have been made in the beginning, — that is, when there was nothing but God the Creator, and when there was no mea- sure of time by any thing. — Gen. i. 1. Obs. 42. — God created all things by the word of his power, God brought all things out of nothing by his powerful word ; he only spake, and it was done ; he commanded, and all things stood fast. This may also signify the Personal Word ; for it is said in John i. 3, that " all things were made by him ; and with- out him was not any thing made that was made." See John i. 1-3. Obs. 43.-*-God made all things in the space of six days. God, who is almighty, could have created all things in a moment of time; but he spent six days in the work, in order that we might the better apprehend the order of the creation, and because he saw it more for his own glory and the good of mankind to set them an example of working six days, and resting on the seventh. 1. On the first day, God created the highest or the third heavens ; the angels, who are called the hosts of heaven and sons of God, — Job xxxviii. 7; the chaos of earth, and water, and light. He also divided light from darkness ; calling the former day, and the latter night. — Gen. i. 1-5. 2. On the second day, God created the firmament, which seems to include both the starry and aerial heavens. He also divided the waters above the firmament of air from those under it. — Gen. i. 6-8. 3. On the third day, God collected the waters, which were mingled with the earth, into one place, and called them seas ; and the dry land which then appeared he called earth. He also caused the earth to bring forth all kinds of trees, plants, and herbs, before there was any sun or rain. — Gen. i. 9-13. 4. On the fourth day, God created the sun, moon, and stars ; placed them in the heavens ; and appointed them to rule the day and the night, and to be for signs and for seasons, and for days and for years. — Gen. i. 14-19. 5. On t\iz fifth day, God made of the waters all kinds of great and small fishes, and every living creature that moveth in the waters. He also made of the waters all kinds of winged fowls which fly in the open heavens. — Gen. i. 20-23. <). On the sixth day, God made of the earth all kinds of beasts, and cattle, and creeping things. And last of all, he made man, — his body of the dust of the ground, and his soul a spirit imme- diately breathed into him by himself. — Gen. i. 24-30. e2 54 CREATION OF MAN. Obs. 44. — God created all things very good. It is said that God created all things very good, because, upon a survey of his works, he himself declared them to be so. — Gen. i. 31. This goodness, visible in the creatures, consisted in the perfection of their nature. Every thing perfectly answered the end for which it was created. Ail the evil which hath since come into the world, is either sin itself, which is the work of the devil and man, or the fruit and consequence of sin. Obs. 45. — God created all things for his own glory. He made all things, that he might manifest, — 1. The glory of his power, in effecting so great a work by a mere word. — Ps. xxxiii. 6; Rev. iv. 11. 2. The glory of his icisdom^ in the order and variety of the creatures. — Ps. civ. 24. 3. The glory of his goodness, especially towards man, for whom he first provided all things necessary, before he called him into existence. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. How glorious that God is whom we profess to worship. 2. That God has sole dominion over us, and that therefore he is entitled to our obedience. 3. That it is our duty to advance the glory of God. 4. That we ought to be thankful for every enjoyment. 5. That seeing all have one Creator, all ought to live as the children of one God. 6. That we ought to meditate on the works of God, and from them to carry our views to God himself, and to Jesus Christ, who hath accomplished the work of redemption, the chief of all the ways of God. Creation of Man, &. 10— $?ofo Ht'D &o& treat? jfEtan? God created man male and female, after his own image, in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness, with dominion over the creatures. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That God created man male and female. Gen. i. 27.— " God created man ; male and female created he them." 2. That man was created in the image of God. Gen. i. 27.— " God created man in his own image ; in the image of God creat- ed he him." 3. That the image of God consists in knowledge, righteous- ness, and holiness. Col. iii. 10. — " Put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him." Eph. iv. 24. — " Put on the new man, which, after God, is created in righteousness and true holiness." See also Eccl. vii. 29. CREATION OF MAN. 55 4. That God created man with dominion over the creatures. Gen. i. 28. — " God said unto them, Have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." EXPLANATION. Obs. 46. — God created man male and female. At first God created one man and one woman, — man out of the dust of the ground, and woman out of a rib taken from man's side.— Gen. i. 27, and ii. 7, 21, 22. The import of their names, Adam and Eve, is this : — Adam signifies earth ; and man was so called, because he was formed of the dust of the earth : and Eve signifies life ; so called, be- cause she was to be the mother of all living, — that is, of all that have been, are, or shall be in the world. Man consists of two parts — a body and a soul. The soul was not, like the body, formed from the earth, but was a spiritual substance breathed into him by God, — Gen. ii. 7 ; and hence God is called the Father of spirits, and the God of the spirits of all fiesh. — Heb. xii. 9 ; Numb. xvi. 22, and xxvii. 16. The soul of man differs from his body in every respect, both as to its nature and duration. The body is visible, but the soul is invisible ; the body is mortal, but the soul is immortal. Obs. 47. — Man was created after the image of God, which consists in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness. By the image of God we are to understand the similitude or likeness of God. — Gen. i. 26. But this similitude or likeness does not consist in any outward visible resemblance (for God is a spirit, and cannot be seen), but in the inward resemblance of his soul to God, in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness. — Col. iii. 10 ; Eph. iv. 24. This image of God, in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness, includes the universal and perfect rectitude of the whole soul : — 1. Knowledge in the understanding. — Adam knew much more of the nature and perfections of God, and of his own duty to him, than it is possible for fallen man now to know. 2. Righteousness in the will. — In his primitive state, man had a disposition to every thing which was right. There was nothing in him but perfection in its utmost extent. 3. Holiness in the affections.- — At first man's affections were holy and pure; they were placed upon the most holy, high, and noble objects ; his desires were chiefly after God, and his delight was chiefly in him. He was capable of the immediate enjoyment of God. There was nothing in him which offended God ; nothing by which his glory was dishonoured. Obs. 48. — Man was created mth dominion over the creatures. 56 NATURE AND CHARACTER OF Man at his creation had dominion, not only over himself and his own affections, but also over the inferior creatures. Before the fall, all the creatures of this world were subject to man ; but since that, either they have become a terror to him, or he to them. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn,— 1. That we should be humble and lowly, seeing we had our beginning in earth, and to earth we must return. 2. The change which sin hath produced upon the whole man. 3. That we should love God, seeing we were at first made after his image ; and that we should love one another, see- ing we are the children of the same common parents. 4. The necessity of being created anew in Christ Jesus ; and of confor- mity to him who is the " image of the invisible God." Nature and Character of God's General Providence. &. 11.— $2£f)at ar* 6ofc's toorfes of $rout&nue? God's works of providence are his most holy, wise, and powerful, preserving and governing all his creatures, and all their actions. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That God preserves all his creatures. Ps. cxlv. 15. — " The eyes of all wait upon thee, and thou givest them their meat in due season." See also Heb. i. 3. 2. That God directs and governs all his creatures, and all their actions. Ps. ciii. 19. — " His kingdom ruleth over all." Pro v. xvi. 9. — A man's heart deviseth his way, but the Lord directeth his steps." 3. That God's works of providence are most holy. Ps. cxlv. 17. — " The Lord is righteous in all his ways, and holy in all his works." 4. That God's works of providence are most wise. Isa. xxviii. 29. — " The Lord of hosts, who is wonderful in counsel, and ex- cellent in working." 5. That God's works of providence are most powerful. Ps. lxvi. 7. — M He ruleth by his power for ever." Dan. iv. 35. — ** None can stay his hand." EXPLANATION. Obs. 49. — There is a Providence. By Providence, we are to understand that almighty power, by which, in holiness and wisdom, for his own praise and glory, God preserves, or upholds and governs, the heavens and the earth, and all things in them, from the least to the greatest. That there is a Providence, which superintends all things, may be proved from the following things : — god's general providence. 57 1. From reason; which informs us, that, if all things were left to themselves, they would fail of their intended end. 2. From conscience ; which, by accusing or excusing, stands forth as a notable testimony of Providence. 3. From Scripture ; in almost every page of which we have proofs of this. See Col. i. 17; Neh. ix. 6; Heb. i. 3; Ps. cxix. 91 ; Gen. viii. 21, 22; Acts xvii. 28; Ps. cxxxvi. 25; Job xii. 10; Matt. x. 29, 30 ; Acts xiv. 17, &c. 4. The same arguments that prove the existence of God, prove that there is a Providence ; for the one cannot exist without the other. Obs. 50. — The agency of God in providence consists in pre- serving and governing his creatures and their actions. 1. In preserving his creatures. This he does, both by con- tinuing or upholding them in being, and by providing things necessary for their preservation. — Ps. cxix. 89-91, and cxlv. 15, 16. See also Heb. i. 3 ; Col. i. 17. 2. In governing his creatures and their actions. This he does when he rules over them, and disposes and directs them to the end for which he designed them. — Ps. lxvi. 7 ; Prov. xvi. 9. See also Acts xvii. 28; Ps. Hz. 13; Job xxxiv. 13, and xxxvi. 22, 23; Eph. i. 11 ; Job xxxiii. 13. Obs. 51. — The objects of God 1 s providence are, all his creatures and all their actions. 1. It extends to all the creatures, rational and irrational, ani- mate and inanimate, great and small. — Heb. i. 3; Ps. ciii. 19; Matt. x. 29, 31, and vi. 26, 28, 30. 2. It extends to all their actions: — All natural actions. — Acts xvii. 28. All casual actions. — Exod. xxi. 12, 13. All morally good actions. — John xv. 5. All morally evil actions or sins. God permits sinful actions. But it must be remembered, that God's permission ef sin is not a bare permission, as if he could not prevent the sin from taking place, or as if he regarded it not ; but that it is connected with his government of the world, and with the ends which he proposes to himself, and which issue in his own glory. An action may be good, which is thus under the providence of God ; while, at the same time, it may be a very sinful action, as it proceeds from man; such was the selling of Joseph into Egypt, and such was the crucifixion of the Lord of glory .—See Gen. i. 15-20 ; Acts ii. 23, 28 ; Rom. viii. 32. Obs. 52. — God's providence is most holy, ivise, and powerful. The properties of God's providence are the following : — 1. It is most holy. — Ps. cxlv. 17. Infinite holiness and purity are visible in all his administrations. This appears in bringing glory to his mercy and justice out of sin ; in making the worst of sinners become the greatest saints, — 1 Tim. i. 12, 13; and in exe- cuting judgments on sinners, even in this world. — Ps. ix. 16. 58 COVENANT OF WORKS — 2. It is most wise. God makes all things subservient to the ends for which he designed them. — Rom. viii. 28 ; Ps. civ. 24 ; Isa. xxviii. 29. 3. It is most powerful. None can resist the will of God. — Dan. iv. 35 ; Ps. cxxxv. 6, and lxvi. 7, and lxii. 11. Obs. 53. — The providence of God is commonly distinguished into ordinary and extraordinary, common and special. 1. God's ordinary providence is, his observing the order of things appointed by him from the beginning. — Hos. ii. 21, 22. 2. His extraordinary providence is, his going beyond or acting contrary to the natural order of things ; and such events are called miraculous. 3. His common or general providence is, that care which he exercises over all the creatures which he hath made, without ex- ception. — Neh. ix. 6 ; Acts xvii. 28. This is called God's natural government. 4. His special providence, or his moral government., is that care which he exercises over the rational creation alone; and this, again, may be limited to that particular care which he exercises over his own people in this world. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. That seeing there is an over- ruling Providence, all things shall work together for the good of the people of God. 2. That we ought to submit to the provi- dence of God. 3. That we ought not to account it strange although the wicked flourish, and the righteous be persecuted. 4. That they are a happy people whose God is the Lord. 5. The duty of observing the providences of God. See Ps. cvii. 43. SECT. III.—OF THE SPECIAL PROVIDENCE OF GOD TOWARDS MAN IN HIS CREATION AND FALL :— UNDER WHICH ARE CONSIDERED, TH E COVE- NANT OF WORKS, THE FALL OF MAN, THE EXTENT OF THE FALL, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. Covenant of Works — Its Parties and Terms. 6L 12. — GM\)z\ special art of prout&ence fct'D (Go& em- rise totoarfc plan in rtje e state toljerem ije bias rreateD? Whepi God had created man, he entered into a covenant of life with him, upon condition of perfect obedience; forbidding him to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, upon the pain of death. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — ITS PARTIES AND TERMS. 59 1. That God entered into a covenant with Adam. Hos. vi. 7 (margin). — ** They, like Adam, have transgressed the covenant." 2. That it was a covenant of life. Rom. vii. 14). — " The com- mandment was ordained to life." 3. That the condition of this covenant was perfect obedience. Rom. x. 5. — " The man who doeth those things shall live by them." See also Gen. iii. 3. 4. That man was forbidden to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Gen. ii. 17. — M But of the tree of the know- ledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it. 1 ' 5. That the penalty of this covenant was death. Gen. ii. 17. — " In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." EXPLANATION. Obs. 54. — A covenant of works was made with A dam. The word covenant denotes any thing fixed or established. See Jer. xxxiii. 25, where we read of the Lord's u covenant with day and night." But it has generally a reference to an agree- ment made and entered into between parties. That a covenant of works was really made with Adam, as the representative of mankind, while he was in a state of innocence, or when he was created, will be evident from the following things : — 1. The transaction into which God entered with man contains every thing necessary and requisite in a covenant ; such as parties, a condition, a promise, and a penalty. 2. It is expressly called a covenant. — Gal. iv. 24 ; Hos. vi. 7, margin. 3. It had certain signs and seals appended, which gave force to it, and which confirmed it as a covenant. These were, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and the tree of life. 4. In Scripture we read of a twofold law, the one opposed to the other ; namely, the law of works and the law of faith. See Rom. iii. 27, where, by the law of faith, we must understand the covenant of grace j and by the law of works, the covenant oj works ; for what is said of the one is also said of the other. But, 5. Nothing proves more effectually that a real and proper covenant was made with Adam, than the imputation, of his firsi sin to all his natural posterity. See Rom. v. 12, 17, 18. Obs. 55. — The parties of the covenant of works were, God and man. 1. On the one side was God, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, man's Creator and Sovereign Lord, who is the great Law- giver, and the Author of all good to his creatures. 2. On the other side was man, God's creature, — Adam, repre- senting all mankind, and covenanting with God, not only for himself, but also for all his posterity, as the natural father of all, and the appointed federal head. 60 COVENANT OF WORKS — In this covenant there was no Mediator : nor was there need of one ; for man was yet the friend of God ; and his service, while he continued in innocence, was acceptable to him, being fully conformable to his law. Obs. 56. — Tlie condition of the covenant of works was perfect obedience. By the condition of this covenant, we are to understand that which God required of Adam, in order that he might have a right, both for himself and for all his posterity, to eternal life, which was the reward promised. The obedience required, was a regard to the whole law of God — that law which was written on man's heart at his creation ; and also to the positive precept that he gave him, which was, " Not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil ■, ,, and all this from a due regard to the Divine authority. This tree was called the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, because, on his eating of it, Adam knew by experience what good he had lost, and what evil he had brought upon himself and his posterity. With respect to the nature of this obedience, it was necessary that it should be, — 1. Perfect in respect of its principle. It was to proceed from love to God, who requires not only external, but internal obe- dience, or the obedience of the heart. 2. Perfect in parts. It was to extend to all the commands of God, with respect to thoughts, words, and actions. 3. Perfect in degrees. Every act of obedience was to be perfect in degree, wanting notning of that perfection which the law required. He was to love the Lord his God with all his heart, with all his soul, with all his strength, and with ali his mind. 4. Perfect in duration, — without interruption, while God should continue him in the state of trial. — Gal. iii. 10. This was the condition of the covenant of works. On no other terms could Adam have attained to eternal happiness by it, or be justified in respect of his state before God. Hence it appears, that sincere obedience could not have been accepted, and that there was no place for repentance under this covenant. The threatening was, " Is the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." Such a positive denunciation cut off all hope, and rendered repentance unavailable. Obs. 57. — The reward promised in the covenant of icorlcs was life. The words, " In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die," evidently imply, that life should have been preserved, if innocence had not been lost. The reward promised was life in its fullest extent, both here ITS PARTIES AND TERMS. 61 and hereafter; and hence this covenant is called the covenant of life. The life promised was, — 1. Natural life, which consists in the union of the soul and body. 2. Spiritual life, which consists in the union of the soul with God, the supreme good. 3. Eternal life, which consists in the perfect, immutable, and eternal happiness of both soul and body in heaven for ever. Obs. 58. — The penalty of the covenant of works, or the threatening denounced in case of disobedience, was death. " In the day that thou eatest thereof, that is, of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt surely die; or, dying thou shalt die.^ 1 his includes, — 1. Natural death, or the death of the body; to which man be- came liable the moment he sinned. — See Rom. vi. 23. 2. Spiritual death; which consists in the separation of the soul from God. 3. Eternal death; ®r the separation of both soul and body from God for ever, in that place which is prepared for all the workers of iniquity. This is also called the second death; and it includes in it the perfect and complete loss of every thing com- fortable in respect ol this life, as well as of that which is to come. The penalty of the violated law of works is not properly an act, a mere act, of the will of God, — it flows from his perfections; for if we consider the nature of God,, we shall find that it is ab- solutely necessary that there should be such a strict and awful penalty. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. The love of God in conde- scending to enter into covenant with his own creature. 2. How exalted man was* in his primeval glory, seeing he was capable of being a party in a covenant with God himself; and seeing God, as it were, made him his equal ! 3. What man is in his fallen state. 4. The deep concern which we all have in this cove- nant : Adan^s sin is our sin. 5. What it is that God will accept, ■ — namely, the same obedience that was required of Adam, either in our own persons, or in the person of a surety. 6. The absolute necessity of a Mediator, seeing this covenant which was made with Adam is- now broken, and we ruined by it. 7. The danger of disobedience ; and that God is a consuming fire to the sinner. 8. That none can be delivered from the curse of this covenant, but by Jesus Christ, who hath fulfilled its condition, who hath endured its penalty in all its extent, and who is now set forth a complete atonement for sin. 9. The necessity of self-examina- tion, whether we are delivered from the curse of the law, or whether we are still under the law as a covenant of works, and under the power of sin. — Gal. iii. 10. 62 MAN'S DISOBEDIENCE AND FALL BY SIN. Man's Disobedience and Fall by Sin. <&. 13. — 33 1& our first parents continue m tne estate toijere in ttjep toere creates ? Our first parents, being left to the freedom of their own will, fell from the estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That our first parents were left to the freedom of their own will. Gen. iii. 6". — " When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, she took of the fruit thereof, and did it; and gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat.'" See also Gen. iii. 13. 2. That they fell from the estate in which they were created, by sinning against God. Rom. v. 12. — " By one man sin en- tered into the world, and death by sin.'* See also Gen. iii. 8, and Eccl. vii. 29. EXPLANATION. Obs. 59. — Our first parents were left to the freedom of their own will. By freedom of will, we are to understand a liberty in the will, whereby, without any compulsion or external violence, it either chooses or rejects what is set before it. There are three ways in which the will may be said to be free :<• — 1. It may be said to be free only to good, when it is not com- pelled or forced, but freely chooses only what is good. Thus, the will of God (to speak after the manner of men), and the will of the holy angels and of glorified saints, are free only to good. 2. It may be said to be free only to evil, when it is not con- strained, but freely chooses what is evil or sinful. Thus, the will of the devil and of unregenerate men is free only to sin. 3. It may be said to be free both to good and evil, when it chooses sometimes what is good and sometimes what is evil. Such is the will of regenerate persons in this world. They freely choose good, through a principle of grace implanted in them by the Spirit of God; but sometimes, through the remainder of corruption, their will is inclined to what is sinful. The freedom of will which man had at his first creation, was a freedom both to good and evil. The natural inclination of his will was only to what is good; but, being created mutable, it might, through temptation or some external circumstance, be altered and become inclined to evil. It is the prerogative of God alone to say, 4< I am Jehovah, I change not." — Mai. iii. 6. The expre.-sion, M Being left to the freedom of their own will/* does not imply that God withdrew any of the power which he at NATURE OF SIN IN GENERAL. 63 first conferred upon them ; for the gifts and calling of God are without repentance, — t. c, what he bestows he does not recall. — Rom. xi. 29; James i. 13. But it evidently implies, that he did, not bestow any more strength upon our first parents than what he conferred on them at their creation. It must ever be re- membered, that God is not hound, in any measure, to bestow on any of his creatures what he does not see to be for his own glory, however useful and profitable it may be to them. Obs. 60. — Our first parents fell from the estate in which they were created, by sinning against God. This was the consequence of being " left to the freedom of their own frill." Through the temptation of the devil, through de- sire of gratifying their appetite, through desire of being made wise and like God, and through hope of escaping the threatened punishment, they ventured to eat of the forbidden tree, against the express command of God. — Gen. iii. 4-6. That our first parents fell from the estate of innocence in which they were created, will be evident, — 1. If we consider the circumstances as they are given by the sacred historian in the third chapter of Genesis. 2. If we reflect on the gracious promise of a Redeemer which God made to them, we cannot express a doubt respecting their fall from their original state. But, 3. Nothing whatever so fully proves this truth, as what we daily behold in the world aroilnd us, — viz., the consequences of sin ; such as alienation from God in every respect ; and death, •which every where bespeaks itself to be ** the wages of sin." — Rom. vi. 23. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. The weakness of man when left to himself. If Adam did not continue in innocence when he had sufficient strength imparted to him, how little has man now to glory of, in respect of his power and ability to obey ! 2. The necessity of watchfulness in every state in which we can be placed in this world. — 1 Cor. x. 12. 3. The necessity of an almighty Deliverer, who can raise us from the ruins of the fall, and restore us to our forfeited privileges, and honour, and happiness. Nature of Sin in General. (0U 14.— 2OTjat is &tof Sin is any want of conformity unto, or transgression of, the law of God. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That any want of conformity to the law of God is sin. 64 NATURE OF SIN IN GENERAL. Gal. iii. 10. — " Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." 2. That any transgression of the law of God is sin. 1 John iii. 4. — u Sin is the transgression of the law." EXPLANATION. Obe. 61. — Any want of conformity to the law of God is sin. By the law of God is to be understood the commandments which God, the great Creator and Supreme King and Lawgiver, hath laid upon all men, who are his creatures and subjects, as the rule of their obedience. This law is to be found written in some measure, though darkly, on the hearts of all men, — Rom. ii. 15 ; but it is most plainly and fully written in the Word of God, or the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. In Scripture there is mention made of three laws: — 1. The judicial law, which chiefly concerned the Jewish nation, and is not in all respects binding on other nations. 2. The ceremonial law, which was binding on none but the Jews, and that only for a time, — namely, until the coming of Christ, by whom it was fulfilled and abrogated. And, 3. The moral law, which is per- petually binding on all mankind till the end of the world. And it is this law which is chiefly referred to in this place. By want of conformity to the law, we are to understand an v»n- suitableness to the law, or a disagreement with it in any respect ; or a swerving from it in its strictness, spirituality, and extent. Want of conformity to the law includes, — 1. Original sin, and the natural enmity of the heart to the law of God, — Rom. viii, 7, which is want of conformity of heart. 2. All sins of omission, which are a want of conformity of life to God's law. Obs. 62. — Every transgression of the law of God is sin. The word transgression signifies a going beyond the bounds or limits assigned to one. To transgress the law of God is to go beyond, or break the bounds or limits which he hath assigned to all our actions ; or it is to do any thing inconsistent with, or contrary to, the law, either in thought, word, or deed ; which is to sin against God. The evil of sin chiefly consists in the dishonour which it does to God, in its contrariety to his nature and Jaws. And it may be discovered, — 1. From the dishonour wljich it does to the glorious attributes of Deity. 2. From, what God hath done, in order that it may be washed away. 3. From the awful effects of sin, which, if persevered in and unpardoned, is accompanied with everlasting misery. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. That, in order to see what we NATURE OF A»AM S SIN IN PARTICULAR. 65 are, we must examine ourselves by the law of God. 2. That the law of God is exceeding broad, requiring obedience from all, either in their own person, or in the person of a surety. 3. That we ought to hate sin supremely, as the source of every woe and the spring of every sorrow. 4. That there is need of a Saviour to deliver us from sin, which is the worst of evils ; and that we ought to give ourselves no rest, until we are washed, and justified, and sanctified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of God. Nature of Adam's Sin in Particular. <£. 15.— SBfjat toas X\)t Stn toljerebj cur first farenta fell from tije estate toijeret'n tfjeg toere rreateD ? The sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they were created, was their eating the for- bidden fruit. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That the first and particular sin of Adam was the eating of the forbidden fruit. Gen. iii. 6. — u She took of the fruit thereof, and did eat ; and gave also unto her husband with her, and ho did eat."" 2. That the eating of the forbidden fruit was the cause of Adam's fall. Rom. v. 17. — " By one man's offence, death reigned by one." EXPLANATION. Obs. 63. — Man has fallen from his original state-. The state in which man was placed at the beginning, was such, that nothing whatever could have been added to it, to render it more perfect or more happy. That man has fallen from his original state, will be evident from the following things : — 1. If we look to man himself, sufficient proof presents itself; for sin every where marks his steps, and every thing within him shows that now he is not what he once was. 2. If we look to God, the same truth recurs ; for he who was once the friend of man, is now the enemy of those who will not have him as their all'. 3. If we look around* us in the world, we shall behold evi- dences of our fall ; for what is all the affliction, and sorrow, and death which we behold, and to which we are all subjected, but the offspring of sin ? 4. If we look to the world to come we shall also find a proof of our apostasy from God ; for, had there been no transgressor, there would have been neither punishment nor a place of ever- lasting woe. f2 66 NATURE OF ADAM'S SIN IN PARTICULAR. Obs. 64. — The first and particular sin which was the cause of Adam's fall, was the eating of the forbidden fruit. The command which God gave to Adam, to try his obedience, was a positive command not to eat of a certain tree, which was in itself a thing indifferent, in order that he might see that his obedience was to turn upon the strict will of God, which was the best test of his obedience. The fruit of which our first parents ate, was called the for- bidden fruit, not because there was any evil in it as fruit, for this was impossible, all things having been made very good ; but merely because God commanded Adam not to eat of it, for the trial of his obedience. The eating of the forbidden fruit was not the first sin that was committed by man in our world, for before our first parents ac- tually took of the forbidden tree, tbey were guilty of the sin of unbelief \ which is the root of all other sins ; for they believed the devil, who said, " Ye.shaU not surely die," rather than God, who assured them that they should "surely die," if they should but touch it. — Gen. iii. 3> 4. But, The eating of the forbidden fruit was the first sin that was finished, and that which brought death into the world with all our woe. Obs. 65. — The occasion of the sin of our first parents, was the temptation of Satan. Satan, or the devil, who is called the serpent, on account of his subtilty, pretended to have a much greater regard for their happiness and comfort than even God himself had ; and, accord- ingly, he endeavoured to convince them, that however much love God pretended towards them, he wished to contract their com- forts in the garden. And in this he too well succeeded. — Gen. iii. 4, 5. In this temptation the subtilty of Satan appeared, — 1. In addressing himself to Eve, who was the weaker vessel, when she was at a distance from her husband. 2. In presenting himself before her with various untruths. 3. In attempting to destroy man so soon after his creation. Obs. 66. — The sin of our first parents involves a violation of the whole law. Although there are many of the commandments of the moral law which our first parents in a state of innocence could not have openly violated , yet^ by considering circumstances, we shall find that, in some respects, their sin involves a violation of all. 1. They made themselves new gods. 2. They served the Lord according to the counsel of their own heart, and were to give him such worship as seemed good to themselves. NATURE OF ADAM'S SIN IN PARTICULAR. 67 3. They profaned the attributes of their Creator, and despised the ordinance of their God. 4. They rendered themselves incapable of worshipping him on the seventh day, when he rested from all his works. 5. They honoured not their Father who is in heaven, but for- got him who was their benefactor, and were wanting in duty to one another. 6. They murdered themselves and all their posterity. 7. They had no way to cover their nakedness, but by sewing fig leaves together. 8. They were guilty of theft, for they took what did not belong to them. 9. They testified falsely against the Lord, and gave more credit to a lie, than to the truth of God. 10. They murmured at their lot, and were not content with their situation ; for nothing would satisfy them until they had laid hold on that which God had reserved for himself. And, saith the Apostle James, " He that offendeth in one point, is guilty of all." Obs. 67. — The sin of our first parents was highly aggravated in the sight of God. We shall find this to be the case, if we consider, — 1. The person guilty : man in innocence, who was fully able to continue in that state. 2. The number involved in the transgression : Adam sinned against God to his own ruin, and that of all his natural posterity. 3. The time when it was committed : which was soon after his introduction into paradise. 4. The place where the sin was committed : viz., paradise, which was peculiarly dear to God, and which he had prepared for the habitation of his innocent creature. 5. The object of the temptation : which was apparently a matter of little moment ; the fruit of a tree, which ought cer- tainly to have had no influence upon him to commit such a sin, seeing he had abundance of every other kind of fruit, and of every thing necessary to his comfort and happiness. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. How weak a creature man is, even in his best state. 2. That, if left to ourselves, we would, like our first parents, immediately choose death. 3. The neces- sity of watchfulness and prayer. 4. How inexcusable all are who have sinned against God ; and how insufficient every plea will be, when God riseth up in judgment. 5. That no sin is small in the sight of God. 6. How vigilant and active Satan is to destroy the soul. 7. The necessity of self-denial. 8. The ne- cessity of Jesus Christ as a Saviour from all sin, — from the sin of our nature, as well as from all actual transgressions. 68 ADAM'S SIN IN PARTICULAR — Adams Sin in Particular. — 1. Extent of the Fall. €}. 16— 23t& ail J$tankm& fail m ^tram's first trans- gression ! The covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his posterity, all mankind, descending from him by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him, in his first transgression. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That the covenant of works made with Adam was for him- self and his posterity. Rom. v. 14. — *' Nevertheless, death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come." St That all mankind, descending from Adam hy ordinary ge- neration, sinned in him and fell with him. Rom. v. 12. — " By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin ; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." 1 Cor. xv. 22.— " In Adam all die." 3. That it was in Adam's first transgression that we sinned and fell. Rom. v. 18. — " By the offence of one (or, by one offence), judgment came upon all men to condemnation.'" EXPLANATION. Obs. 68. — The covenant made with Adam, was not only for himself, but also for his posterity. That Adam was the federal head and representative of all mankind will be evident, when we consider what is said in the Scriptures of truth. Had he been placed only as a private per- son, having no connection whatever with his posterity, Reve- lation would not have been what it is. We should not have been there informed, that " by the disobedience of one, many were made sinners," — Rom. v. 19 ; that " in Adam all die," — 1 Cor. xv. 22 ; that "by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and that death passed upon all men, seeing that all have sinned," — Rom. v. 12. We should not have been informed that we were conceived in sin and brought forth in iniquity, — Ps. li. 5; that, " by the offence of one man, judgment came upon all men to condemnation," — Rom. v. 18; that " there is none righteous ;" that "all have gone out of the way ;" that ""there is none that understandeth j • that "there is none that seeketh after God."— Rom. iii. 10, &c. But what sets this in a still clearer light, is the apostle's com- parison of Adam and Christ, in 1 Cor. xv., where they are op- EXTENT OP THE FALL. 69 posed to one another, not as private, but as public persons and representatives, and where the apostle speaks of them as if there were none else. See verse 47. Obs. 69. — All mankind, descending from Adam by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him. As Adam was the federal head and representative of all man- kind ; so, when he sinned and fell, they sinned and fell with him. This is evident from the passages of Scripture quoted above. That they did not sin and fall with him as he was the natural root of mankind, is evident ; for had this been the case, it might also be said, that all sin, because their immediate parents have sinned. That Adam's sin is imputed to his posterity, and that they are included in the covenant, is likewise evident from the death of infants. They die, not because they are sinners by imitation (as some affirm), for they cannot imitate any one, but because they siwned and fell with Adam, being included in the covenant made with him. It is here said, that those alone sinned in Adam, who descend from him by ordinary generation, to exclude the Lord Jesus Christ, who was descended from Adam, but not by ordinary generation. — Gen. iii. 15 ; Matt. i. And hence it is said, that he was "separated from sinners. " — Heb. vii.. 26. Jesus Christ could not be represented by Adam, because he himself was to be a representative. — 1 Cor. xv. Obs. 70. — All mankind sinned in Adam 9 and fell with him. only in his first transgression. The first transgression of Adam was the violation of the cove- nant that God made with him, by eating the forbidden fruit. The sins which Adam committed after his first transgression, are not reckoned to his posterity ; because, when the covenant was violated, he ceased to be a public person or representative. He could not continue in this capacity any longer, than either until the condition required was fulfilled, or until he had forfeited the promise made to him. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. What sin is, and what it has done; and that its nature must be exceeding sinful, seeing it hath extended over all. 2. That the fall of man is a lesson to all to beware of pride, and of thinking too highly of themselves. 3. The necessity of repairing to the slcond Adam, who alone can repair the shattered state of things as the first Adam left them. 4. That it is the duty of parents to their children, to consult their present and future welfare. 70 CONSEQUENCES OF THE PALL. 2. — Consequences of the Fall. &. 17.— fotto toijat estate oi& tlje jTall oring Jftanfcmo' I The fall brought mankind into an estate of sin and misery. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That the fall of Adam brought mankind into a state of sin. Rom. v. 19. — " By one man's disobedience many were made sinners." 2. That the fall of Adam brought mankind into a state of misery. Rom. v. 17. — " By one man's offence death reigned by one." See also Gal. iii. 10. EXPLANATION. Ob's. 71. — Man's fallen state is a state of sin and miser)/. 1. It is a state of sin, because man is now under the guilt of sin, and sin hath dominion over him. — Rom. iii. 1.9, and vi. 14. 2. It is a state of misery, because, according to the penalty of the law, death and the curse involve him in all manner of misery. —Rom. v. 12. Sin and misery are inseparably connected. If there were no sin, there could be no misery ; for sin is the procuring' cause of all misery. Man's state of sin and misery is expressed in Scripture by a state of darkness, — Eph. v. 8 ; a state of distance, — Eph. ii. 13 ; a state of condemnation and wrath, — John iii. 18, 36 ; a state of bondage or captivity, — Isa. xlix. 24 ; and a state of death both legal and spiritual, — Eph. ii. 1. Out of this state of sin and misery no man can deliver himself; Jesus Christ alone can do it ; for he alone eould satisfy the de- mands of that law which man has violated. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. That seeing the whole world is guilty before God, every mouth must have been for ever stopped, although he had left all mankind to perish eternally with the fallen angels. — Rom. iii. 19. 2. To admire the infinite love of God in sending his beloved Son to save us from sin, as the only way of being saved from misery. — Heb. ii. 14, 10'. 3. — Sinfulness of Man's State by the FaU. $, 18.-— S2EJ)erem consist* tije Sinfulness of tfjat estate toijereinto iEanfell? The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, con- sists in the guilt of Adam's first sin, the want of original righteousness, and the corruption of his whole nature, SINFULNESS OF MAN'S STATE BY THE FALL. 71 which is commonly called Original sin ; together with all actual transgressions which proceed from it. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. "We are here taught, — 1. That the sinfulness of man's fallen state consists in the guilt of Adam's first sin. Rom. v. 18. — ** By the offence of one, judg- ment came upon all men to condemnation." See also verse 19. 2. That the sinfulness of man's fallen state consists in the want of original righteousness. Rom. iii. 10. — " There is none right- eous, no, not one." 3. That the sinfulness of man's fallen state consists in the cor- ruption of our whole nature, or of original sin. Ps. li. 5. — * l Behold, I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me. 11 4. That all our actual transgressions, in which the sinfulness of our state also Consists, proceed from original sin. Matt. xv. 19, 20. — u Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adul- teries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies; these are the things which defile a man." EXPLANATION. Obs. 72. — There is suck a thing as original sin. Original sin is that sin which we have from our original and birth, and from which all actual transgressions proceed. That original sin exists, may be proved, — 1. From various passages of Scripture, — Gen. v. 3, where it is said that Adam begat a son in his own likeness, after his own image. These words evidently imply, that the son that was born to him, came into the world with the same corrupt image that he himself bore after the fall. Gen. vi. 5, — from which it is evident, that there must be some corrupt fountain from which all wicked- ness proceeds ; otherwise the very imaginations of the heart could not be only evil, and that continually. But this is more fully expressed in chap. viii. 21, — u The imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth;" which points out the source of all to be original depravity. See also Job xiv. 4 ; James iii. 11 ; Job xv. 14- John iii. 6; Ps. li. 5. 2. From circumcision under the Old Testament, and haptism under the New; which maybe considered not only as seals of the covenant, but also as designed to express the impurity and pollution of all when they come into the world, and the necessity of being cleansed or regenerated, in order that they may be fitted, as the real children of God by covenant, for the enjoyment of him. 3. From the conduct of children; from the sickness, and pains, and death itself, to which they are subject when, they come into the world; and from tne diversity of their tempers and disposi- 72 SINFULNESS OF MAN'S STATE BY THE FALL. tions, before they can scarcely form an articulate sound, or com- municate their wants and necessities. 4. From the exercises of the people of God, who view original sin as the source of all their troubles, and sorrows, and trials in this world. 5. From the consideration, that the wickedness of man cannot be accounted for, if we deny that it flows from this corrupted fountain. Obs. 73. — Original sin consists in the guilt of AdatrCs first sin, the want of original righteousness , and the corruption of the whole nature. It consists, — 1. In the guilt of AdarrCs first sin. By this we are to under- stand, that we are all chargeable with Adam's first ski, which is made ours by imputation. As the righteousness of Christ is im- puted to all his spiritual seed, so the sin of Adam is imputed to all his natural posterity. — Rom. v. 19. 2. In the want of original righteousness. By this we are to understand the want of that purity of nature, which Adam had when he was created, and which consisted in the full and perfect conformity of all the powers of his soul to ( the spotless nature of God, and to that holy law which was written on his heart. — Eccl. vii. 29. 3. In the corruption of the whole nature. By this we are to understand the universal corruption and depravation both of the body and of the soul ; in the members of the one, and in the powers and faculties of the other. — Isa. i. 5, 6. At the creation of the soul, God does not infuse sin into it. As a righteous Judge and a God of justice, he only withholds that original righteousness which Adam possessed in the begin- ning, and we in him, and which he is under no obligation to be- stow. Adam having cast it off at first, God now denies it, as a punishment of sin, and as an act of justice. Obs. 74. — Original sin, as to its nature, is universal, dis- covers itself where least expected, is a great hindrance in the way of holiness, is the spring of all actual sins, and exposes to the wrath of God. 1. It is universal. Not only is every man depraved, but every part of every man,— all the members of the body, and all the powers and faculties of the soul, — the understanding, the will, the affections, &c. — See Rom. iii. 10, 12, 23 ; Isa. i. 5, 6 ; Jer. iv. 22 ; 1 Cor. ii. 14 ; Rom. viii. 7 ; Hos. xi. 7 ; John v. 40 ; Tit. i. 15; Ps. cxyi. 13,21. 2. It discovers itself where least expected. It not only breaks forth in the greatest sinners, but also in the most eminent saints, in a way altogether unexpected and sudden. — Jer. xvii. 9 ; Matt. MISERY OF MAN*S STATE BY THE PALL. 73 xxvi. 69-75 ; 2 Sara. xi. ; Jonah i. ; Gen. ix. 21, &c. ; 2 Kings viii. 12. 3. It is a great hindrance hi the way of holiness. It prevents the soul from running in the way of God's commandments ; it easily besets us ; and it constitutes a remarkable hindrance in spiritual communion with God. — Rom. vii. 19, &c. 4. It is the spring or source of all actual transgressions. All the wickedness that is in the world proceeds from this fountain ; for if there were no original sin, there would be no actual. See Matt. xv. 18, &c. 5. It exposes to the wrath of God. All are by nature the children of wrath. — Eph. ii. 3. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. The source and spring of all sin, and of every trouble to which we can be exposed, both in this world and in the world to come. 2. That parents and chil- dren are on the same footing with respect to original depravity. 3. The necessity of being taken out of a natural state, and of be- ing ingrafted into Christ, the second Adam. 4. The absolute necessity of regeneration, and of the Spirit of Christ, who can make all things new. — John iii. 3, 5. 4. — Misery of Man's State by the Fall. <$. 19. — ©SJijat ia ti)t mMX% of tijat estate toijemuto Jftan feU ? All mankind by their fall lost communion with God, are under his wrath and curse, and so made liable to all the miseries of this life, to death itself, and to the pains of hell for ever. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That all men have, by the fall, lost communion with God. Gen. iii. 8. — u Adam and his wife hid themselves from the pre- sence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden." Ver. 24. — " So he drove out the man." See also Isa. lix. 2, and Rom. viii. 7. 2. That all men by nature are under the wrath and curse of God. Eph. ii. 3. — " And were by nature the children of wrath." Gal. iii. 10. — " Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." 3. That all men are, by the fall, made liable to all the miseries of this life. Job v. 7. — M Man is born unto trouble as the sparks fly upward." See also Gen. iii. 17. 4. That all men are, by the fall, made liable to death. Rom. vi. 23. — " The wages of sin is death." G 74 MISERT OF MAN'S STATE BY THE FALL. 6. That all men are, by the fall, made liable to the pains of hell. Ps. xi. 17. — The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God." 6. That the pains of hell are eternal. Matt. xxv. 46. — " These shall go away into everlasting punishment." See also Isa. xxxiii. 14; Mark ix. 43, 44; and 2 Thess. i. 9. EXPLANATION. Obs. 75. — Man, by the fall, has lost communion with God. The communion which man enjoyed in innocence, consisted in the uninterrupted enjoyment of the gracious presence and favour of God, together with the most intimate familiarity with him in the garden of Eden. That man has lost this communion, is evident from his being represented as " without God in the world," and as " alienated from the life of God." — Eph. ii. 12, and iv. 18. See Gen. iii. 8, 23, 24. By losing this communion, man has sustained the greatest loss; because God is the chief good, and man's chief happiness consists in communion with him. Obs. 76. — Man is under the wrath and curse of God. 1. Man is under the wrath of God. To be under the wrath of God, is to lie under his anger in the dreadful effects of it, whe- ther they are visible to us, or whether they are concealed from us. — John iii. 36 ; Eph. ii. 3 ; Ps. xi. 5. 2. Man is under the curse of God. To be under the curse of God, is to be under the curse of his righteous law, which de- nounces all possible evil against the sinner. — Gal. iii. 10; Ps. xc. 11; Deut. xxviii. 15, &c. ; Ps. vii. 11; Rom. i. 18; John iii. 18, 36. Obs. 77. — In this world man is liable to all hinds of misery and to death. 1. Man is subject to all the miseries of this life, which concern the body. Such are these : public judgments and calamities of every kind ; the troubles, afflictions, and diseases to which the human frame is exposed; the losses, crosses, and disappoint- ments, and acts of injustice, to which men are continually liable; and all the poverty, and straits, and difficulties, and wants, which fall to the lot of many in the present state of existence. 2. Man is subject to all the miseries of this life, which con- cern the soul. Such are these: blindness of mind, — Eph. iv. 18; a reprobate mind, — Rom. i. 28; strong delusions, — 2 Thess. ii. 11 ; hardness of heart, — Rom. ii. 5; horror of conscience, — Isa. xxxiii. 14; Gen. iv. 13; Matt, xxvii. 4; and vile affections, — Rom. i. 26, &c. 3. Man is subject to death itself, or the separation of the soul from the body, — Heb. ix. 27 ; Rom. vi. 23 ; Ezek. xviii. 4 MISERY OF MAN'S STATE BY THE FALL. 75 It may be here remarked, that with respect to the outward conduct of Providence, all the external miseries above mentioned equally befall the righteous and the wicked; but they are sent for very different purposes. To the righteous they are only fa- therly chastisements, and work together for their good ; whereas, to the wicked they come in a way of vindictive wrath, and are the forerunners of eternal sorrow, unless they repent. To the former they are sanctified, and made the means of further holi- ness ; to the latter they are the commencement of wrath on ac- count of their sins, to be revealed in due time. Obs. 78. — In the world to come, man is liable to Hie pains of hell. By the pains of hell we are to understand the punishment of the wicked, which consists, — 1. In the punishment of loss: the loss of God, who alone is and can be the chief good of the soul ; the loss of Christ, whose presence is better than life ; the loss of the communion of angels and saints ; the loss of the soul ; and the loss of every possibility of escape. 2. In the punishment of sense: which is expressed in Scrip- ture by "being shut up in darkness;" "a lake that burneth with fire and brimstone,' which is the second death ;" " the worm that dieth not, and the fire that shall never be quenched ; * " de- struction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power," &c. Obs. 79. — The pains of hell are eternal, or for ever. That the punishment of the wicked shall be eternal, is evident from Scripture, which assures us, that the wicked shall be cast into everlasting fire — shall go into everlasting punishment — shall be punished with everlasting destruction — shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. These expressions leave no room for doubt respecting this matter. The eternity of punishment is not essential to the threatening or penal sanction of the law ; for had this been the case, there never could have been a satisfaction for sin. But it arises from the nature of the creature, which being finite, can never yield a satisfaction of infinite value. So that the punishment of the wicked must be everlasting, as well as the blessedness of the saints, which is so on account of the infinitely valuable satisfac- tion of Christ in their stead. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. What an evil, what a bitter, and what a hateful thing sin is, which is accompanied with such consequences, and which brings with it such a train of misery, if not washed away in the blood of Ch'rist. 2. That however sweet the pleasures of sin may now appear, it shall prove bitterness in 76 PLAN OF REDEMPTION. the end. 3. The necessity of fleeing to the man Christ Jesus from the avenger of blood ; of repairing to the horns of the altar, that sin may not be our ruin. 4. The value of the gospel, and the value of the soul ; and the inconceivable misery of all that are in a state of nature. SECT. IV. — OF THE SPECIAL PROVIDENCE OF GOD TOWARDS MAN IN REDEMPTION :— UNDER WHICH ARE CONSIDERED THE TLAN OF REDEMPTION, THE APPLICATION OF REDEMPTION, AND THE BENE- FITS OF REDEMPTION. Division 1. — Plan of Redemption. <£. 20.-— 33t& ©foil Irabe all Jfftanlanu' to pen's!) in tlje estate of &in anti mtsern % God having out of his mere good pleasure, from all eternity, elected some to everlasting life, did enter into a covenant of grace, to deliver them out of the estate of sin and misery, and to bring them into a state of salva- tion by a Redeemer. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That God hath ordained or elected some men to everlasting life. Acts xiii. 48. — " As many as were ordained to eternal life believed.'' See also 2 Thess. ii. 13. 2. That God's purpose of election was from eternity. Eph. i. 4. — " He hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world." 3. That the election of God is the result of his own good plea- sure. Eph. i. 5. — " Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will.'' 4. That God entered into a covenant of grace with Christ for the elect. Ps. lxxxix. 3. — " I have made a covenant with my chosen.'" 5. That the design of this covenant was to deliver the elect from their original state of sin and misery, and to bring them into a state of complete salvation by a Redeemer. Rom. viii. 1. — V There is now no condemnation to them who are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." Rom. v. IB. — " By the righteousness of one, the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life." See also Matt. i. 21 ; 1 Thess. i. 10; Tit. iii. 5 ; and Prov. xxiii. 2. EXPLANATION. Obs. 80. — God has elected or ordained some men to eternal life. PLAN OF REDEMPTION. 77 By election we are to understand God's purpose of love and grace towards some sinners of mankind, when he might have left all, without exception, to perish in their sins. Acts xiii. 48 ; Matt. xx. 16 ; Luke xii. 32. That to which the elect are chosen, is everlasting life. They are also chosen to the means which lead to this end; for the means and the end are so intimately connected, that they cannot be separated. — Acts xiii. 48 ; 2 Thess. ii. 13. At present, the elect and believers are not of the same extent ; but they shall be of the same extent ; for all that are elected to everlasting life, shall in due time be brought out of their state of sin and misery, into a state ol complete salvation. Obs. 81. — God's purpose of election was from eternity. The purpose of God concerning the elect took its rise from eternity. It never had a beginning ; for he loved them from everlasting. Jer. xxxi. 3 ; Eph. i. 4 ; 2 Thess. ii. 13. To say that God makes no choice until the day of believing, is as much as to say that he did not know from eternity who should believe, and what should take place in time. And to deny his omniscience and foreknowledge, is to deny his being. Obs. 82. — God's purpose of election was the result of his own good pleasure. 1. God's decree of election was not to save such as should be- lieve and persevere in a state of holiness. Were this the case, it would render this act of God a thing altogether uncertain; be- cause, if it depended on this circumstance, it would be uncertain whether any should believe, and consequently uncertain whether any should be saved. 2. God did not choose men to eternal life because he foresaw their faith and holiness. Scripture never attributes election to faith and holiness foreseen, or afterwards visible in the saints. On the contrary, these are always exhibited as the fruits and effects of election, and therefore they can never be viewed as the cause of it ; for the same thing can never, at one and the same time, be both cause and effect. See Eph. i. 4, 5. 3. Jesus Christ is not the cause of election. If God in love sent his Son into the world, to redeem those whom he had given to him, it cannot for a moment be supposed that he was the cause of electing love. See John iii. 16. 4. The only reason, then, that can be given, and that to which the Scriptures everywhere attribute election, is the mere good pleasure of God. Eph. i. 5. — " Having predestinated us to the adoption of children by Jesus Christ unto himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the Beloved." See also Matt. xi. 26 ; Rom. ix. 16, &c. ; Mai. i. 2, 3. o2 78 PLAN OF REDEMPTION. Obs. 83. — God entered into a covenant of grace toith Christ for the elect The misery into which all mankind had plunged themselves by sin, was the occasion of the covenant of grace ; but the cause of it was the amazing love, and condescension, and sovereign grace of God. In Scripture this covenant is denominated by various names : — 1. It is generally called the covenant of grace; because the love and grace of God were the cause of it. 2. It is called the second covenant; because, although it was first made, it was last executed. — Heb. viii. 7. 3. It is called a better covenant, namely, than the covenant of works ; because it is established on better promises. — Heb. viii. 6*. 4. It is called the neio covenant; because it was last intimated, and because it shall continue sure in all its parts to the end of the world. — Heb. viii. 8. 5. It is called a covenant of peace ; because by it a reconciliation is made between God and man. — Ezek. xxxvii. 26 ; Isa. liv. 10. That the covenant of grace was made with Christ, as the re- presentative of the elect, or as the second Adam, will be evident from the following things : — 1. From various passages of Scripture ; Ps. lxxxix. 3, &c, where reference is made to the covenant of royalty which was made with David, as representing his seed ; but not to the cove- nant made with him alone. See ver. 19-36, where we have God plainly covenanting with Christ ; for these verses are expressed in language too strong to have their full application to the cove- nant of royalty made with David, as king of Israel ; which, however, without doubt, was typical of that made with Christ. See also Heb. viii. 6, and Gal. iii. 16, 17. 2. From Christ being called the second Adam. See 1 Cor. xv. 45, 47, where Adam and Christ are evidently contrasted. Christ cannot be called the second man in any other sense than as he is the federal head of his spiritual offspring, as Adam was: of his natural posterity. 3. From Christ and his spiritual seed being called by the same names. They are both called Israel. — Isa. xlix. 3, and Rom. ix. 6. They are both called Jacob. — Ps. xxiv. 6 ; Isa. xli. 14. They are both called Christ. — 1 Cor. xii. 12 ; Gal. iii. 16. See also Eph. iv. 13, and v. 30. 4. From the promises of this covenant being all made with Christ.— Gal. iii. 16, 17 ; Tit. i. 2 ; 2 Tim. i. 9. 5. From his being the surety of the covenant. — Heb. vii. 22 ; 2 Cor. v. 21. 6. From all the covenants, which were typical and emblema- tical of the covenant of grace, being made with parents, as repre- sentatives of their posterity. — Gen. ix. 9, and xvii. 7 ; 2 Sam. vii. 11, &c. PLAN OF REDEMPTION. 79 It was necessary that this covenant should be made with Christ, as the representative of his people, for the following reasons : — 1. That the love of God might appear to have been from of old, even from everlasting ; and that the covenant might be called an everlasting covenant. 2. Because, if this covenant had not been made with Christ, who is a Divine person, as a representive, it could not have been called a covenant of grace and a covenant of life ; nay, it could not have been made at all. 3. That it might be a covenant of rich and absolutely free grace. — Eph. ii. 7. In respect of Christ himself, indeed, it was a pure covenant of works, — that is, a condition was to be per- formed by him, that life might be obtained for those whom he represented ; but to sinners it is a covenant of rich and super- abundant grace. — Rom. iv. 4, 5. 4. That there might be a similarity between the way in which sin and death entered into the world, and the way in which righte- ousness and life should be communicated. Sin and death entered by one man, and therefore righteousness and life must also enter by one man. 5. That the promises of the covenant might be sure to all the elect. See Ps. lxxxix. 2, 19, 22, &c. Obs. 84. — The parties of the covenant of grace are, Jehovah and Jesus Christ, and in him elect sinners of mankind. 1. The party in this covenant on heaven's side is Jehovah, essentially considered, as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, — who must be viewed in this covenant as an offended Judge, because of the sin of man ; as a God of love, designing to display the exceeding riches of his grace and love in the redemption of a lost elect world ; and as an infinitely just and holy God, who can- not save the sinner, but in a way of magnifying his law, of satis- fying his justice, and of vindicating his holiness. 2. The party-contractor on man's side is the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God; who must be viewed in this covenant as full of compassion, and as a representative, and a living and quickening head to all his spiritual seed. As connected with this covenant, he must also be viewed by us, as bone of our bone ; as nearlv allied to us, having assumed our nature, that he might die and overcome death, and restore us to our former privileges and bless- ings in the same nature that sinned ; and as a sacrificing priest, who offered up himself once for all, a sweet-smelling savour to God, without spot or blemish. — Heb. ix. 14, 15. 3. The party whom Christ represented — for whom he con- tracted — for whom he stood bound — and for whom he undertook (all these being terms of the same import and extent), are sin- ners of mankind; who, as connected with this covenant, must 80 PLAN OF REDEMPTION. be considered as lost and undone in themselves, by the violation of the first covenant in Adam, who represented all mankind ; as altogether unable to recover themselves from their lost state, or to pay to God a ransom for their souls, to glorify his injured per- fections, or to retrieve the honour of his law ; as distinguished from the rest of the world by the sovereign purpose and grace of God; and as objects of the redeeming love of the Eternal Trinity. That Christ did not represent all mankind in this covenant, is evident from his laying hold of the seed of Abraham alone, which are only a part of the seed of A dam, the parent of all mankind. See Heb. ii. 16. Although the first Adam represented the whole human race, yet it is no disparagement to the federal representation of Christ, the second Adam, that he represented only some of mankind; because it is unspeakably more for Christ to undertake for one sinner, than it was for Adam in the beginning to undertake for a whole righteous world. See Rom. ix. 21. Obs. 85. — The condition of th# covenant of grace was the righteousness of the Lord Jesus Christ. Nothing whatever but the finished righteousness of Jesus Christ, by which he hath satisfied all the demands of the broken law, can be properly and strictly called the condition of the covenant of grace. The righteousness of Christ, which was the condition of this covenant, consisted in these things : — holiness of nature, — Heb. vii. 26 ; righteousness of life, — Isa. liii. 9 ; John viii. 46; Luke xxiii. 4; John xviii. 38, and xix. 4, 6; and full satisfaction to the penalty of the broken law incurred by the sin of man. That the righteousness of Jesus Christ alone is the proper con- dition of the covenant of grace, will be evident from the following considerations : — 1. Christ undertook to discharge, not a part only, but the whole of the debt of a guilty chosen world ; which shows that he left nothing whatever to be performed by them as any part of the condition on which eternal life is to be obtained. 2. Nothing whatever but the fulfilment of the same condition, by the non-fulfilment of which the covenant of works was broken, can be the condition of this covenant, — that is, perfect obedience, which none but Christ could yield. 3. In Scripture we find, that Christ's righteousness satisfies every demand of law and justice ; consequently nothing remains to be done by any other besides him, as the condition of this covenant. See Eph. v. 2 ; Tit. ii. 14. 4. The Scriptures fully show, that believers found their hopes of eternal life upon the righteousness of Christ, and not upon any other thing whatever. — Eph. i. 7; Phil. iii. 8, 9. 5. That which cannot answer the demands of the violated cove- PLAN OF REDEMPTION. 81 nant, cannot be called a condition, in the strict and proper sense of the word; but faith, repentance, love, and new obedience, though absolutely necessary on our part, cannot do this; there- fore they can by no means be called proper conditions of the covenant of grace. So far from this, they are promises on the part of God himself to those interested in the covenant. — Phil. i. 29; Acts v. 31. 6. This covenant excludes boasting ; but this could not be the case, if faith, and repentance, and holiness were the conditions of it. — Rom. iii. 27; Tit. iii. 5. But although faith cannot be properly called the condition of the covenant, yet it is the means by which a sinner is put in possession of the blessings of this covenant. It is by this that he becomes one with Christ, by whom he is represented. And by this union all things become the believers, and all the pro- mises of the covenant become sure to all the seed. Obs. 86. — In the covenant of grace, certain promises were made to Christ, and to tlie elect in him. 1. Those which immediately respect Christ, were, the promise of assistance in the work to which he was called ; the promise of the acceptance of it, connected with his resurrection from the dead; and the promise of a glorious reward. — Isa. xlii. 1, 6, Iii. 13, and liii. ll, 12. 2. Those which are made to the elect, and which flow from what Christ hath done, are many and precious. They pertain to life and godliness, to grace here and glory hereafter ; and they include every thing necessary for them in this world, and in that which is to come. — Tit. i. 2; 1 John ii. 25. Obs. 87. — The administration of the covenant of grace was committed to Jesus Christ. By the administration of the covenant, we are to understand the management of it, in order that it may become effectual for the end for which it was made. It is necessary that there should be an administration of this covenant, because there is much to be done in order that the elect may be brought to glory. This administration is devolved on Christ, as a reward of his arduous undertaking, that all the ransomed of the Lord may rest on him for their salvation, and for every mean of salvation. The objects of this administration are sinners of mankind inde- finitely, or any of the family of Adam without exception. — See John iii. 14, 1.5; Luke ii. 10; Matt, xxviii. 18, 19; Prov. viii. 4. Although Christ effectually saves none but the chosen of God, who were given to him ; yet by his office, he is the Saviour of the world, suited for every sinner ; and all are warranted by God to apply to him for salvation. Hence he is called " the Saviour 82 PLAN OF REDEMPTION. of all men, especially of those that believe;" and his salvation is called the common salvation. — Jude 3. The offer of his salvation is unlimited wherever it is preached. — Mark xvi. 15, 16. The foundation of the unlimited administration of the cove- nant, in the offer of Christ in the gospel, is the sufficiency of his blood for the salvation of all. See John i. 29. Christ hath fulfilled the condition of the covenant in all its extent ; and his atonement, being infinitely valuable in itself, is considered, as such, a sufficient ransom for all. Obs. 88. — The design of the covenant of grace was to deliver the elect out of their state of sin and misery, and to bring them, into a state of salvation. • The great end which Christ has in view in the administration of the covenant is, that elect sinners may be brought out of a state of sin and misery, into a state of salvation; and this he does by bringing them personally and savingly within the bond of the covenant. When Christ administers the covenant to the elect, who alone are the objects of its peculiar administration, he bestows upon them all things, which he is empowered to bestow, by way of a testament,' — every thing necessary for their recovery and ever- lasting happiness. — Luke xxii. 29. And the means by which a sinner is put in possession of all these blessings, is faith, which is likewise his gift. INFERENCES. From this subject we learn, — 1. How mysterious the ways of God are to the children of men. 2. The duty of submission to the ways of God. 3. To beware of curiously searching into the hidden things of God ; but to seek after scriptural views of him. 4. The sovereignty of the grace of God. 5. The necessity of self- examination, whether or not we are interested in the electing love of God. 6. The necessity of making our calling and election sure; seeing the decree of God is not our rule, aiid we are to act as if there were no decree. 7. The amazing love of the Eter- nal Trinity to a self-destroying world. 8. That if salvation could have been obtained in any other way than by a covenant of grace, so much would not have been done for the salvation of the sin- ner. 9. That this covenant is every way suitable to the case of sinners. 10. How worthy Jesus is of our highest love and esteem, who thus stood in the breach, that wrath might be averted. 11. That Christ is freely offered in the gospel to all men, whatever their character may be. 12. That all are called to examine themselves, what part they have in this well-ordered covenant ; whether they are yet brought within the bond of it, or whether they are still far from righteousness. 13. That it is the duty of all to believe that Jesus Christ is the Saviour of the world, and their Saviour in particular, by the appointment of the Father, THE PERSON AND CHARACTER OF THE REDEEMER. 83 and by the offer of Christ himself. 14. That if we are not savingly interested in this covenant, we can have no hope beyond the grave; this being the only remedy for the sinner, and the Scriptures having concluded all under sin. 15. That holiness is necessary, as the only way by which we can evidence our interest in the covenant of grace. 16. That, in every time of need, we ought to go to Christ himself for every thing of which we stand in need; seeing he is the administrator of the covenant, to whom all things are committed. 17. That all things shall work together for the good of those who are interested in the covenant. 18. The happiness of the believer, and the misery of the unbeliever, who is in a state of distance from the covenant of grace. The Person and Character of the Redeemer. Q, 21.—S®f)o fe tije Hfouremer of Sod's 0lect? The only Redeemer of God's elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man, and so was, and continueth to be, God and man, in two distinct natures, and one person for ever. ANALYSIS AND PROOFS. We are here taught, — 1. That the Lord Jesus Christ is the Redeemer of God's elect. Gal. iv. 4, 5. — " God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law. . See also 1 Tim. ii. 5. 2. That Jesus Christ is the only Redeemer of man. Acts iv. 12. — " Neither is there salvation in any other. 1 ' 3. That Jesus Christ is the eternal Son of God. Mark xvi. 16. — " Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." See also Heb. i. 8. 4. That Jesus Christ became man. John i. 14. — " The Word was made flesh." See also Heb. ii. 16. 5. That Jesus Christ is both God and man. 1 Tim. iii. 16. — " And, without controversy, great is the mystery of godliness : God was manifest in the flesh." See -also Rom. ix. 5. 6. That Jesus Christ possesses the natures of God and man in •ne person. Col. ii. 9. — u For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily." 7. That Jesus Christ will continue to be both God and man for ever. Heb. vii. 24. — u But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood." EXPLANATION. Obs. 89. — The Lord Jesus Christ is Hie only Redeemer of Qod*s elect. It may be here remarked, that he is called Lord, because, as 84 THE PERSON AND CHARACTER OF THE REDEEMER. God, he is the Most High over all the earth ; and, as Mediator, all power in heaven and on earth is committed to him, — Matt, xxviii. 17; that he is called Jesus, because he saves his people from their sins, — Matt. i. 21; Luke i. 31; Acts iv. 12; and that he is called Christ, because he is the Anointed of the Lord. Christ in the Greek, and Messiah in the Hebrew language, sig- nify the same thing, namely, Anointed, — which implies his de- signation unto, and his being fully qualified for, his mediatorial office. — Ps. xlv. 7; Isa. lxi. 1; Prov. viii. 23; Ps. ii. 7, 8. Jesus Christ is the Redeemer of God's elect. This name has evidently a reference to the redeemed. Hence it evidently im- plies bondage or captivity to sin, Satan, and the world, and to death and hell, because of the breach of the first covenant. And hence also we are called lawful captives. — Isa. xlix. 24. To re- deem, signifies to buy back what is in bondage or captivity; in which all mankind, without exception, are by nature. — Eph. ii. 1, &c. In order that Jesus Christ might redeem lost sinners, or deliver and rescue them, by power and conquest, out of the hands of Satan, and of every enemy, it was necessary that he should give a sufficient ransom to the offended justice of God. And this ransom he gave, when he offered up himself a sacrifice for sin; than which nothing more could be demanded, in order that the lawful captives might be set free, and made as though they had not been cast off. — 1 Tim. ii. 5, 6; 1 Pet. i. 18. Jesus Christ is said to be the only Redeemer, because none but he was capable of the arduous work of redemption, — Isa. lxiii. 5; none but he was set apart for it by God; none but he was sealed by the Father; none but he received a commission from him to lay down his life for his sheep; none but he is re- vealed as our Redeemer; and none but he was, in every respect, fitted and qualified for the work. Obs. 90. — Jesus Christ is the eternal Son of God. He is not so called because of his office, as some suppose ; for, properly speaking, his office could never procure him the appel- lation of the eternal and only begotten Son of God; but he is the eternal Son of God by nature. The eternal Sonship of Christ is as natural and necessary, as it is natural and necessary for the first person to be called the ^Father. That it is clearly distinguished from his office, is evident from John vii. 29, — '' I know him ; for I a*i from him, and he hath sent me : where his being from the Father, with respect to his eternal generation, is clearly distinguished from his being sent by him, with respect to his office. The nature, however, of the eternal generation of the Son is altogether beyond our knowledge and comprehension ; for, saith the prophet, " Who shall declare his generation ? " — Isa. liii. 8. This passage may be applied, not only to the number of his seed, but also to his eternal generation. THE PERSON AND CHARACTER OF THE REDEEMER. 85 Obs. 91. — Jesus Christ became man. In order that Jesus Christ might be our Redeemer, it was necessary that he should become man; or, tlmt he should be bone of our bone, and flesh of our flesh. — John i. 14; Gal. iv. 4. We are not to suppose, however, that when he became man he ceased to be God: he became Immanuel — God with us, God in our nature. It was necessary that Christ should be both God and man in one person; because, if he had not been so, he could not have been a Redeemer at all. 1. If he had hot been God, he could not have endured that load of wrath which sin deserved; nor could his sufferings, which were but for a time, have been a sufficient satisfaction for sin. 2. If he had not been man, he could not have died; he could not have died in that very nature which sinned, which was abso- lutely necessary, seeing the law saith, " The soul that sinneth it shall die \ n he could not have had a fellow-feeling of our infir- mities, and we should have had no intercessor in our nature at the Father's right hand. Obs. 92. — Jestts ChHst is God and man in two distinct natures and one person. It is said that Jesus Christ is God and man in two distinct natures, to show, that the divine nature is not, by its union to the human nature, rendered finite, and that it does not lose its divine attributes, or those which belong to God; and to show likewise, that the human nature does not, by its union to the divine, possess divine perfections ; although, even as he is man, he is inconceivably superior to a mere man. It is said that Jesus Christ is God and man in one person, to show, that, although the two natures are distinct, and possess their respective and essential properties, they are not divided in him ; or, in other words, that he has not two persons. That the two natures are united in one person, is evident from Isa. ix. 6. — " Unto us a child is bom; and his name shall be called the Mighty God." It was necessary that the Redeemer of God's elect, or the Mediator, should be both God and man in one person, for the following reasons : — 1. That the proper works of each nature might be accepted by God for us, and relied on by us as the works of the whole person, God-man. 2. That he might be a proper Mediator between God and man ; that he might be nearly allied to God, and likewise our near kinsman. — Acts xx. 08; 1 John i. 7. 3. That the interests of both parties — an offended God, and offending man — might be attended to ; and that every thing necessary for a reconciliation might be effected. H 86 THE redeemer's assumption of human nature. 4. That he might apply to us the purchased redemption. 5. Thatj in a word^ in whatever relation he stands to us, his manhood might render it pleasant and delightful, inasmuch as he hath a fellow-feeling of our infirmities; and that his Godhead might render it efficacious, in respect of the blessings which each relation exhibits. Obs. 93. — Jesus ChHst will continue to he God and man in one person for ever. The union of the two natures of Christ is indissoluble and everlasting; for, if he continue for ever as Mediator, which we are assured he will do, as an eternal bond of union between God and man, his manhood must also be retained for ever. See Heb. vii. 25; Luke i. 32, &c; Phil. iii. 21, and if. 9, &c. It may here be remarked, that the union which subsists be- tween Christ and believers, which is very close, and the union of his two natures, differ in the following respect : — The two natures of Christ are but one person; whereas believers, although they are said to be in Christ and Christ in them, are never said to be one person with him. inferences. From this subject we learn, — 1. The greatness of the love of God to perishing sinners ; seeing none but God in our nature could accomplish their redemption. 2. The value of the soul, which could not be redeemed but at the expense of the blood of God's eternal Son. 3. The comfort which arises to the soul from the indissoluble union of the two natures of Christ in one person. If this is everlasting, the union of believers with Christ is also everlasting. See John xiv. 19. 4. That all who are far from Christ shall perish for ever, if they leave this world without an interest in him. 5. How dignified man is ! How dignified the believer is ! inasmuch as his Redeemer assumed his nature, that he might die in his stead. — Heb. ii. 16. 6. The necessity of faith in Christ, seeing he is now exalted ; it is by faith alone that we can behold him. — Mark xvi. 16. The Redeemer s Assumption of Human Nature. <&. 22.— ."goto tittJ €f)rtst, he mjj ti)e &on of