i 1 ^lOSAK'C ^WEUNIVERJ/A ^lOSANCElfjv. . .. , oa ^tUBRARYQc -^IIIBRA ^HDNVSOl^ %il3AlNI1-3WV^ %0JnV3-JO^ %ojn\ C5 .^ 09 SO oa - — ^lOSANCElfx^ O^HONVSOl^ "^/^aMINd-lVlV ^tUBRARYO^^ 5^tllBRARY0^ i? .^;OFCAl!FO% ^.OFCAl; "^^AbvaaiH^ ^5,WEUNIVER%_ o -^P^ ^g ^^WEl)NIVER% ^vVOSANCElfj^^ ^OfCALIFOM^ ^^-OFCAllFOff^j. '^H1BRARYQa so ^\WEUKIVER% '^i'JlJDNVSOl^ ^vWSANCElfX^ oa > so %a3AINrt3\\V^ .^.OF•CAllF0% OS C-3 ^^ %avaani^ ^oAbvaan-^ .^WEUNIVER5/A ^lOSANCElfj-^ o "^/sa^AiNn-awv .^WEUNIVERJ/A % A):lOSANCElfx> o ?3 '^TilJDNVSm^ .^WEUN1VER%. an - •^^^ O ^TJiaDNVSOl^ %a3AINa3WV^ ^lOS-ANCElfj^. 5 ■^/sa^AiNnmv^ ^tl!BRARY, ^OFCAIIFO/?;^ "^^AHvaaiH^ ^IIIBRARY(9a ^HIBRARYO^ ^5i\EUNIVER% a>:10SAKCEI^^ THE PPIILIPPICS OF demosthe:^es EDITED BY FRANK BIGELOW TARBELL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ', ' 1 J ■••• •••• »>, »• » » ■* , *» » o . ■• GINN AND COMPANY BOSTON • NEW YORK ■ CHICAGO • LONDON ATLANTA • DALLAS • COLUMBUS • SAN FRANCISCO Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1880, by FRANK B. TARBELL in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington 916.5 GINN AND COMPANY- I'RO- PRIETORS • BOSTON • U.S.A. !^^ PEEFACE. i CO n^HE present edition of the Philippic Orations of ^ Demosthenes aims to meet the wants of the ^ American student. The text is that of the Ziirich »^do edition (in Baiter and Saiippe's Oratores Attici)^ from which, except in matters of orthography and punctua- tion not affecting the sense, only 'a single departure has been admitted ; to this, wliieh occurs in Phil. II, "^^ 12, attention is called in the Notes. The Introduc- tion follows in its main features, and occasionally in its phraseology, the Introduction given by Rehdantz, in his edition of the Philippics ; for the most part, however, it has been re-written, in especial reliance upon Schaefer's Demosthenes und seine Zeit. The liis- torical portions are designed to furnish the student who is already familiar with the outlines of Greek History with such additional information as will enable him to understand the historical allusions in the accompanying orations. Sections 61-2, based upon Blass's Attische Beredtsamkeit, Bd. Ill, call attention to certain pomts which are not brought out in ordinary accounts of Demosthenes. Anything in the way of a general sketch of Greek oratory, or of a special IV PREFACE. characterization of Demosthenes, seems unnecessary in a work like the present, in view of the accessi- bility of Jebb's Primer of Greek Literature. In the preparation of the Notes, the freest use has been made of all available helps, especially the annotations of Sauppe, Franke, Westermann, Rehdantz, and Heslop. The Analyses are, in the main, taken from Blass's Attisehe Beredtsamkeit. The Editor will be grateful for suggestions or correc- tions of any sort. FRANK B. TARBELL. New Haven, Conn., May, 1880. The references in the Notes to lexicon and grammars have been changed so as to conform to the latest editions ; a few other corrections have been introduced. F. B. TARBELL. Chicago, III., November, 1899. INTRODUCTION. II^TRODUOTIO]^. The Spartan Hegemony. THE Athenian Hegemony, established in 477-476 B.C., and upheld and strengthened until the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War in 431, had, at the conclusion of that war in 404, fallen to pieces (ix. 23). The long struggle with Sparta had reduced Athens to abject weakness. Without allies, without ships, without Long Walls, her treasury and her citizens impoverished, Athens became for several years a cipher in the general politics of Greece. Sparta, on the other hand, now entered on a career of su]5remacy. Her control over the coasts and islands of the ^gean was secured by overthrowing the existing governments of the cities, and cre- ating in each an oligarchy of ten citizens, called a dekarchy or dekadarchj', subservient to the Spartan policy, and sup- ported b}' a Spartan harmost and garrison. With these tools at her disposal, Sparta exercised over the Greek world an op- pression which was soon felt to be intolerable. Effective resistance to this oppression began at Thebes. In 395 this state became involved in hostilities with Sparta, and Athens, now somewhat revived, was easily induced to join the struggle against her hated conqueror. At the instance of the Thebans she sent into BcEOtia a force of hoplites and cavahy, which, to be sure, arrived at Haliartus just after the Thebans had won a decided victory over one Spartan arm}', but which did material servdce to the cause by completing the discouragement of the remaining Spartan troops, and so causing theh' hasty retreat into the Pelox)onne- Viii INTRODUCTION. sus (iv. 17). Encouraged by the success of these eiforts, Thebes, Athens, Corinth, and Argos now combined against Sparta in a war, which, from being carried on mainly in Co- rinthian territory, was called the Corinthian War. Of the Athenian generals who figured in this contest, Polystratus, Iphikrates, Chabrias, and others, Iphikrates was the most prominent, distinguishing himself by the state of efficiency to which he brought his arm}' of Athenians and mercenaries, and especiall}^ b}' his exploit, long remembered by the Athenians with extreme pride, of annihilating a Spartan mora, or divi- sion of 600 men, at Lechffium (iv. 23-4) . 3 The Corinthian "War dragged along indecisively for several 3'ears, until, in 387, the Spartan Antalkidas succeeded in in- ducing the King of Persia to impose peace upon the Greek world. The Peace of Antalkidas nominally secured auton- om}' to every Greek State, except that the islands of Lemnos, Imbros, and Sk^Tos, which had been acquired b^* Athens about a century before, were suffered to remain as portions of Athe- nian territory (iv. 27, 32, 34) ; but actually the Spartans, who were entrusted with the execution of the terms of the Peace, made use of it to maintain their own ascendenc3^ Their despotic hold upon the Greek cities was not relaxed un- til, in 379, the expulsion by the Thebans of the Spartan gar- rison which had for three years occupied their citadel, gave the 4 sigrnal for a general revolt. Athens at once exerted herself to establish a new maritime confederacy, having for its object resistance to the hated oppression of Sparta. She renounced all interference with the domestic affairs of her allies, even promising that her citizens should not be permitted to acquire property in the territory of any member of the confederation ; the allies were all to stand on an equal footing, and their com- mon interests to be cared for b}' a Federal Diet sitting in Ath- ens ; finally, the pecuniar}^ contributions needed were fixed at a moderate figure, and called by a new name, — syntaxis in- stead of phoros, — in order to avoid the associations which had INTRODUCTION. IX gathered around the latter word in the Confederacj' of Delos. Founded on these just and mutually satisfactory terms, the new confederacy came, by the year 373, to number upwards of seventy cities, chiefly on the coasts and islands of the ^gean, ])ut including also Thebes. The strength of the league was turned against Sparta in the so-called Boeotian War, and the naval victory of Naxos, won by the Athenian commander, Chabrias, over the Spartans in 376, may be regarded as mark- ing the downfall of the Spartan Hegemony (ix. 23). It was, however, reserved for the Thebans, now dissociated from the Athenian confederacy, to inflict upon the Spartans at Leuktra, in 371, that crushing defeat Avhich reduced them thenceforth to the third place among the states of Greece. Greece at Philip's Accession. In Boeotia, the Peace of Antalkidas, so long as it was ob- 5 served, had maintained the several communities in independ- ence of one another, but within a few years after the uprising in 379, Thebes had succeeded, by dint of destroying cities hostile to herself, as Platsea and Thespiae, in uniting the whole district under her own headship. The victory at Leuk- tra raised this unified Boeotia to the rank of a widely influen- tial state (ix. 23). Under the guidance of the great general and statesman Epaminondas, the Thebans extended their authority over the adjacent districts, — Phokis, Lokris, Malis, Euboea, most of Thessaly, etc. They even pushed their in- fluence into the Peloponnesus. Here the Arcadians, who had long been submissive allies of Sparta, were organized into an anti-Spartan confederacy', dependent upon Thebes. Messenia was torn from Laconia, and made an independent state. Other Peloponnesian states made common cause with Thebes. And though with the death of Epannnondas, in 362, Thebes declined in influence, she remained without dispute the strong- est continental power in Greece. INTRODUCTION. Athens, too, maintained and extended her maritime power between 371 and 357. Duiing this period Samos was suc- cessfully besieged, treated as an Athenian possession, and occupied bj' Athenian kleruchs ; the region round the Ther- maic Gulf, including the important towns of Pydna, Potidjea, and Methone, was captured (iv. 4), and to Potid^ea Athenian kleruchs were sent (vi. 20) ; and other acquisitions were made. And, in 357, when some of the Euboean cities (see § 5) got into difficulties with Thebes, and applied to Athens for help, the Athenians, with a promptitude and energy rare for that generation, sent thither a force which rescued the threatened cities, and brought the whole island under Atlienian control (iv. 17). But though, at the moment of Philip's accession, Athens presented an outward show of pi'osperity and power, events soon showed that she was unfit to grapple with a strong and determined enemy. In comparison with the Age of Pericles, the Age of Demosthenes was an age of decline in political wisdom and pi'udence, in patriotism, in \'igor, — a decline not peculiar to Athens among tlie states of Greece, but most strilving there, because of the gi'eater prominence of the city and the greater things expected of her. Thus, whereas in the fifth century, B.C., the Athenians had been forward to risk their lives in militar}^ ser\ace, in the fourth century the}' were extremely reluctant to undergo its hardships, and put forth its efforts. Hence the employment of mercenaries (^cVoi) be- came more and more common. "There arose (as in the four- teenth and fifteenth centui'ies in modern Europe) Condottieri like Charidemus and others, — generals having mercenary bands under their command, and hiring themselves out to any prince or potentate who would employ and pay them. Of these anned rovers, — poor, brave, desperate, and held by no civic ties, — Isocrates makes repeated complaint, as one of the most serious misfortunes of Greece." (Grote, Hist. Greece, vol. xi., p. 393.) And whereas at the beginning of INTRODUCTION. 3a the century the mercenaries employed by Athenf? in the Co- rinthian War had been only an adjunct to the citizen force (see § 2), it had become common by the middle of the cen- tury to entrust military exi^editions entirely to mercenaries , (iv. 24), while the citizens remained at home. Even the i generals and other army-officers shared the prevailing aver- sion to taking the field, and all but one of the number habitually staid in Athens, content with figuring there in festival-day processions (iv. 26). Not only, however, were the military undertakings of Ath- 8 ens entrusted to mercenaries, but these mercenaries were only i irregularly and insufficiently paid. As the Thedric Fund (see § 51) absorbed all the money of the pubhc treasury not needed for other peace expenses, and as the Athenians were unwilling to relinquish or reduce this Fund, the necessary means for paying an army could be raised only by the un- popular method of a direct property-tax. To this method they were slow to resort ; and the general in command, not recei^dng from Athens the wages-money due and promised to his soldiers, might neglect the object for which he had been sent out, and cruise about the iEgean, forcing contributions from helpless aUies (iv. 24, 45); or he might even enter tem- porarily into the service of some foreign power which promised to reward him well ; as, in the midst of the Social War (see § 10), the Athenian general Chares, without authorization from home, entered into the service of Artabazos, the re- volted satrap of Daskyhum (iv. 24) . It is no great wonder that, in such a state of things as this, the generals came to feel estranged from their city, or that, on the other hand, politicians at home, ignorant of military affahs, brought frequent and often wholly undeserved charges of high treason against the generals (iv. 47) . It would, indeed, be a mistake to represent the Athens 9 of the Age of Demosthenes as making only small sacrifices in war. Her total outlay in men and money was great. But :y'' Xii INTRODUCTION. her efforts were fitful, tardy, inefficient. Again and again, owing to lack of previous preparation and of proper energy, \ costly expeditions arrived at their destinations too late to do ' any thing (see §§17, 18, 21). And it was only in exceptional crises (see §§ 6, 22) that the Athenians could throw off their apathy and act in a manner worthy of their forefathers. The Social War. 10 The Athenian confederacy became in twenty years un- popular, for Athens did not long maintain the spirit of justice in which she had organized that league. Her aUies became alarmed at her self-aggrandizing schemes, exhibited in the acquisition of territory for her private advantage (see § 6), and they became indignant at the treatment which they re- ceived from her generals (see § 8). On these grounds all the larger members of the confederacy except Euboea and , Lesbos, viz., Chios, Kos, Rhodes, and Byzantium, revolted in 357. Thus began the Social War, in which Athens made feeble efforts to bring back the seceding states, and which ended in 355 with the recognition of their independence. Not only, therefore, was the attention of Athens partly di- verted from Philip during the first years of his aggressions, but the public treasury was reduced by the loss of a consid- erable part of the contributions from allies. Thus doubly did the Social War favor the cause of Macedon. Progress of Philip from 359 to 351. 11 Down to the tune of Philip, Macedonia was a state of small political importance. The mass of its people, though seemingly of a race akin to the Greeks, had had throughout the historic period no community of development with the Greeks. Rude and fierce, they were accounted barbarians by tne Greeks, and despised accordingly. Not so the Macedo* INTRODUCTION. XIU nian kings. These, according to a generally accredited tra- dition, were genuine Hellenes. It was believed, and perhaps it was true, that in pre-historic times, say in the eighth cen- tury, B.C., an Argive famil}' had settled in Macedonia, and acquired sovereignty there ; and that from this family the subsequent line of kings was descended. These kings gi-adually extended their frontiers, and some 12 of them made eftbrts to introduce Greek culture ; but, until the time of Philip, they did not succeed in building up a strong nation. The country was a prey to intestine feuds, especially on the occasion of the death of a king ; for, in the absence of any recognized law of royal succession, such an occasion was the signal for bloody struggles between the several claim- ants to the throne. So it was at the death of Perdikkas III, 13 in 359. Among the various competitors at the time, one was PerdOvkas's brother Philip, then in the twenty-third year of his age. He had spent some years at Thebes as a hostage, where he had had opportunity to familiarize himself with Gi'eek culture, and to study the arts of government and war. • During the last few years of his brother's reign he had held vice-regal command over a province of the kingdom, and had thus acquired a military force of some importance. On the throne's becoming vacant, he promptly asserted his claims, and, by virtue of his superior sagacity and vigor, rapidly dis- posed of his rivals. Once fairly established at home, he pro- ceeded to deal with the Pagonian and Illp'ian tribes that harassed his northern and north-western borders. The Pae- onians were reduced to a state of quiescence and submission, and the Ulyrians, who had pushed into north-western Mace- donia in considerable numbers, were driven back bej'ond Mt. Pindus. Macedonia was still without a seaboard. The cities about 14 — '1 the Thermaic Gulf owned allegiance to Athens (see § 6).' The Chalkidian peninsula was dotted with upwards of thirty Greek cities, now united into a confederacy of which Ol^nthus Xiv INTRODUCTION. was the head. Farther east, near the mouth of the river Str^Tiion, stood the city of Amphipolis, which, founded by the Athenians in 437, and prized as an invaluable possession on account of its commanding position and rapidly acquired strength, had been lost to them twelve years later, and, spite of constant hopes and repeated efforts, never recovered. Athens, then, the Olj-nthian confederacy, and Amphipolis shut Philip in from the sea. 15" It was in connection with Amphipolis that the -trick}' and -ambitious polic}A of Philip first became manifest. At the out- set of his reign, in making overtures to the Athenians for an alliance, he renounced all pretensions to the possession of that city, to which, however, after ha\ang secured his northern and western frontiers, he laid siege, in 357. The Amphipoli- tans then sent envoj's to Athens to implore aid. Compliance with this suit would, in all probability, have enabled Athens, with little effort and in the most amicable wa}', to regain her much-coveted colony. But simultaneously with the envoys came a letter from Philip, in which he recognized the justice of the Athenian claims to Amphipolis, and promised to surrender it to Athens on its capture. These delusive assur- ances were listened to. Philip prosecuted the siege unhin- dered, and effected the reduction of the place in the same year, partly through the aid of traitors within the walls. Thus he acquired a town of gi-eat value as a seaport, as com- manding the pass over the lower Str^nnon into Thrace, and as opening the way to the rich gold and silver mines of Mt. Pangseum. To relinquish to Athens a position of such im- portance was far from being in Philip's plans. 16 The fate of Amphipolis alarmed the neighboring 01}Tithians, wl!b, during or immediately after the siege just mentioned, sent envoj^s to Athens to conclude an alliance against PhUip. Such an alliance might have proved the salvation of Greece, but the Athenians rejected it. They were still disposed to maintain friendly relations with Philip, and secret negotia- INTRODUCTION. XV tions were now on foot, looking to the exchange of Aniphipolis for Pydna. Instead, however, of making this exchange, Philip proceeded to take P3-dna, in 357, b}- force of arms. Here, as at Amphipolis, he had the co-operation of a party of trai- tors, who threw open to him then- gates. From this time until 346 Athens and King Philip were in a state of mutual hostiUty. The Olynthians ha-sdng been repulsed b}' Athens in their 17 offer of alliance, Philip found it possible and convenient to secure for a time then* friendship. This he piu'chased b}^ the cession of Anthemus (vi. 20), whose position made it a de- sirable member of the Ol^nthian confederac}' ; and also by promising to recover for them the neighboring town of Poti- daea, which had been taken from them a few j'ears before by Athens (see § 6) . This promise was promptly made good. Potidsea was attacked in 356, and though the Athenians sent aid, it aiTived too late (iv. 35) o The Athenian kleruchs in the place were allowed to return to Athens ; the other inhabi- tants were sold into slaver}^ ; the city was destro^'ed, and its teiTitory incorporated with that of Ol3nthus (vi. 20). During the following two years or so, Philip's activity was 18 mainl}' spent in successful sti'uggles with the Thracians, Pae- onians, and IlhTians, among the last named of whom he is said to have founded strongholds for his own use (iv. 48) . But in 353 he attacked Methone, the last remaining posses- sion of Athens on the Thermaic Gulf. Again, as in the case of Potidaea, the armament sent out by the Athenians aiTived too late (iv. 35), With the captm-e of Methone, Philip had excluded Athens forever from the Macedonian coast. With the exception of the Chalkidian peninsula, the whole country from Mt. Ol^Tnpus to the river Nestus was now under Mace- donian rule, and the king was ready for aggressive interfer- ence in the midst of Greece itself. An opportunity soon presented itself. The 3'ear 355, which 19 had witnessed the conclusion of the Social War, had Avitnessed XVI INTRODUCTION. the outbreak in Greece of another intestine feud, the so-called (Second) Sacred War. The parties to the Sacred War were, on the one hand, Phokis, which, since the battle of Leuktra, had been pa3ing unwilling aUegiance to Thebes (see § 5) , and on the other, Thebes, with the remainder of her allies. The Phokians secured the nominal alliance of Athens and Sparta, but the}' received little material aid from abroad. Their main strength came from the temple of Delphi, whose vast treasures the}^ appropriated, at first with the intention of making ulti- mate restitution, but afterwards as unblushing spoilers. This wealth enabled them to collect a mercenary force formidable enough to give them the advantage over their enemies. In 353 they occupied Thermop3lae, a strategic position of im- mense unportance, as the sole and impregnable pass between 20 Northern and Central Greece. They even extended their in- fluence into Thessaly. Here the two joint tyrants of Pherae were struggling, like their predecessors for fifty years back, to gain undisputed mastery over all Thessaly. With these t}'- rants the Phokians allied themselves, while the anti-Phera?an party called in the assistance of Philip. At first the Pho- kians proved more than a match for the king, defeating him in 353 in two battles ; but on his return in the spring of 352 they were themselves overwhelmingly defeated, and lost all footing in Thessaly. The t3Tant3 of Pherae had to fl}' from 21 before Philip (vi. 22). Pagasse, the port of Pherae, on the Pagasaean Gulf, was then besieged by him. The siege was long enough to admit of sending to Athens for aid, and an ex- pedition for the purpose was actually' despatched by Athens, but was once again too late (iv. 35). Philip appropriated this valuable harbor, as also the district of Magnesia, and be- came, in fact, virtual master of all Thessaly. The famous Thessalian cavalry was now at his service ; his revenues were augmented by Thessalian customs duties ; and the possession of another seaport with its shipping greatty increased his ca- pacity for doing mischief on sea. It is now that we begin to INTRODUCTION. ivii hear of his cruisers as plundering the commerce of the Athe- nian allies, and as committing depredations at Lcmnos and Imbros, at Gerajstus, and even at Marathon itself (i\\ 3-1). Worst of all, his proximity to Euboea made it convenient for him to foment b}'' written communications dissatisfaction iu that island (iv. 37). After securing his position in Thessal}-, Philip marched 22 towards Thermop3l;i3, which was still held by the Phokians. This was a movement most threatening to Athens, and the Athenians wei-e not insensiljle to their danger. With a promptitude worthy of their best daj's, they despatched by sea a force, chiefly or wholly citizens, which put the pass in such a state of defense that Philip thought it prudent to retire (iv. 17). For the present, Thermop3lae remained the safe- guard of Central Greece. Repulsed iu this quarter, Philip suddenly appeared, in the 23 autumn of the same 3'ear (352) , in the neighborhood of the Thracian Chersonese, an Athenian possession of great value. He allied himself with Perinthus and Byzantium (ix. 34), gained influence among the Thracian tribes, and laid siege to Herffion Teichos, near the Chersonese. In alarm for the safety of the peninsula, the Athenians voted to raise sixty talents of mone}', and to despatch at once forty triremes, manned with Athenian citizens (iv. 41) . But Philip presently fell sick, and rumors of this, and even of his death (iv. 11), arriving at Athens before the expedition could be got under way, the Athenians subsided into inactivity. Such was the state of aftairs when, in the spring of 351, Demosthenes de- livered his First Phihppic. Life of Demosthenes from 383 to 351. The story of Demosthenes's early life is a stor}^ of wrongs 24 suffered and avenged. Born in 383, the son of a wealth}' manufacturer, named also Demosthenes, the future orator be- XViii INTRODUCTION. came an orj^lian at the age of seven. The elder Demosthenes left behind hun a propertj', large for those tunes, of about fourteen talents, the bulk of which was entrusted to three guardians for his son. But instead of doubling this property b}- careful management, as the}' might well have done, the guardians, in spite of protestations and appeals, criminally squandered it, so that, on becoming of age at the beginning of his eighteenth 3'ear, the son and heir received little more than a talent of his inheritance. Shy in manners, and far from robust in health, the young Demosthenes was animated by an intense sense of his wrongs, and with unbounded energy and perseverance sought to redress them. Having fitted him- self for his task by a course of instmctioji under Isaeus,^ the most eminent lawyer of his day, he spent more than fivejfears — such were the opportunities for shifts and evasions afforded to rogues b}^ the Attic courts — in prosecuting the guardians ; and thousrh he seems never to have recovered more than a small part of the money which was his due, he succeeded in aljundantly vindicating the justice of his cause. 25 This experience left a lasting impress upon his life, not only by intensifying his hatred of wi'ong and desire to right it, but also by determining the career upon which he should enter. He became a logographos, or composer of speeches for the use of litigants in the dikasteries. And though this profes- sion had been brought into disrepute by the unscrupulousness of many who followed it, there is nothing to show that it ever induced Demosthenes to stoop to any thing dishonorable. At first he devoted himself to civil cases only, but in a few years he began to take up public cases, or cases conducted in the interest of the state. These introduced him into the field of politics. Four speeches in public suits, viz., those Against Androtion, Against Leptines, Against Timokrates, and Against Aristokrates, of which only the one Against Lep- tines was delivered by the author himself, belong to the years 355-352. INTRODUCTION. XIX During this period Demosthenes also made his appearance 26 as a parliamentary orator. He addressed the ecclesia for the fii'st time in 354, in an oration On the Symmories, and again in 353, in an oration For the Megalopolitans. The First Philippic probably belongs to the spring of the year 351. There was at the time no special emergency tfLbejnet, but the general subject of the war with Macedonia coming up for discussion, as it had often done before, Demosthenes came forward to advise the adoption of measures more efficient than those which had been previously employed. His main recom- mendation was that a standing force, consisting not of mer- cenaries only, but of mercenaries and citizens, should be organized and kept in the neighborhood of the Macedonian coast, for the purpose of harassing Philip. This recommen- dation he urged with arguments and appeals, and with a scorn for the languid policy of his countrymen which in after years he learned to express with somewhat more of modei'ation (iv. 51). The First Philippic "is not merely a splendid piece of " orator}', emphatic and forcible in its appeal to the emotions ; 1 5^ " bringing the audience by many different roads to the main " conviction which the orator seeks to impress; profoundly " animated with genuine Pan-hellenic patriotism, and with the ^ " dignit}^ of that free Grecian world now threatened by a "monarch flom without. . . . "We find Demosthenes, yet ' ' oul}' thirt_)''[-three] 3-ears old — 3'oung in political life — " and thirteen j^ears before the battle of Chaeroneia — taking " accurate measure of the political relations between Athens ' ' and Philip ; examining those relations during the past, " pointing out how the}' had become every year more unfavor- " able, and foretelling the dangerous contingencies of the " future, unless better precautions were taken ; ex]30sing with i " courageous frankness not only the past mismanagement of ' " public men, but also those defective dispositions of the peo- " pie themselves wherein such management had its root; "lastly, after fault found, adventuring on his own responsi- XX INTRODUCTION. " bility to propose specific measures of correction, and urging " upon reluctant citizens a painful imposition of personal "hardship as well as of taxation." (Grote, Hist. Greece, vol. xi, pp. 442-443). 27 We are not informed whether the motion of Demosthenes on this occasion was carried or not. In all probability that feature, at any rate, upon which he justly laid most stress, — the personal participation of the citizens in a permanent expe- dition, — was not adopted. The habitual listlessness of the Athenians, the insensibility of many to the threatening nature / of Philip's aggressions, the craven feeling in others of inability to cope with him, perhaps, too, the influence of citizens acting ^ in the interests of Macedon, of whom we now hear for the first time (iv. 18), conspired to neutralize the effect of the orator's magnificent harangue. Yet his words may not have been wholly thrown away, but, apart from the increase of reputa- tion which they must have brought him, may have led to the blockade of the Macedonian coast of which we hear shortly- after, and to other measures of which no traces are preserved. Fall of Olynthus. 28 The powerful city of Olynthus, standing at the head of the Chalkidic confederation, remained for some years in alliance with Philip (see § 17). But his self-aggrandizing policy pro- bably at last aroused the Ol3nthians' alarm ; and in 352, while he was engaged in Thessaly, the phil- Athenian party among them (ix. 56) brought the cit}^ in disregard of Macedon, to conclude peace (not alliance) with Athens. In consequence of the state of feeling indicated b}' this move, the relations be- tween Philip and Olynthus became so far from amicable that the former, on his return in 351 from his Thracian expedition (see § 23), made some threatening movement towards the Chalkidian territory (iv. 17). A temporary accommodation was, however, patched up, and during the short term of nom- INTRODUCTION. Xxl inal friendship which followed, Philip seems to have been at work to win over partisans in the various Chalkidic cities ; his success in Olynthus itself is shown by the banishment from that city of the an ti- Macedonian leader, ApoUonides (ix. 56, G6) . When as much as possible had been done in the way of 29 secret intrigue, he proceeded in 349 to overt hostilities ; which, to be sure, until he was within five miles of Olynthus, he de- clared were not directed against that city itself (ix. 11) . The Olynthians, not deceived by this flimsy pretense, appealed, in theii- extremit}', to Athens to conclude an offensive and defen- ' sive alliance. Demosthenes, in his thi'ee Olynthiac Orations, seconded the appeal, and with success. The alliance was ac- cepted and aid sent in three successive expeditions, but all to y no purpose. One after another the cities of the peninsula fell before the arms of Philip, until, at last, in 348, the treason of the two cavalry commanders, Lasthenes and Euthykrates, consigned Olynthus to a like fate (vi. 21 ; ix. 56, 66). Such of the inhabitants as had not perished in battle or made then- escape from the district, were sold into slavery, and their cities, thirty -two in number, were razed to the ground (ix. 26). The Conclusion of the Peace of Philokrates. The destruction of the Chalkidic cities was in itself enough ^ to spread horror and alarm throughout Greece, but the effect ' of these disasters upon Athens was made ten-fold greater by the fact that numerous Athenian citizens, serving in Olynthus, had been taken captive by Philip. Add to this that since the accession of Philip, the Athenian confederacy had been stead- ily dwindling, so as now to include onl}' the smaller mari- time states, such as Thasos, Skiathos (iv. 32), Peparethus, Prokonnesus, Tenedos, etc., and that the military efforts of Athens, tardy and ineffectual as they had been, had yet made a heavy drain upon the resources of the state, and one can- not wonder that a cessation of hostilities came to be eagerly XXll INTRODUCTION. 31 desired. Even before the foil of Olynthus the Athenian actors, Aristodemus and Neoptolemus, whose profession secured their safety in a hostile countr}', had brought from Philip assur- ances of his readiness for peace with Athens. So had also Ktesiphon, who had gone to Macedonia on an embassy in the midst of the war {vi. 28). On the renewal of these assur- ances through Aristodemus after the destruction of Ol^^nthus, a certain Philokrates proposed in the Athenian assembly that an embassy often men be sent to Philip to treat for peace. The motion was passed, and among the envoi's appointed were the mover, Philokrates, and the orators, ^schines and Demosthenes. On most of these men Philip made a very favorable impression, which, in several cases, he probably strengthened by means of bribes (vi. 34) . They returned to Athens early in the spring of 346, and were followed shortly' after by Macedonian plenipotentiaries. Hereuj^on Philokra- tes, who was almost certainl}' in the pa}' of Philip, moved that peace and alliance be concluded between Philip and his allies on the one hand, and Athens and her allies, but with (^ the exception of the Phokians, on the other, on the terms proposed by the king ; viz., that each part}^ retain its present 32 possessions. The proposal to exclude the Phokians from the treat}^ was one both dishonorable and dangerous to Athens ; dishonorable, because they were allies of Athens (see §19), and dangerous, because, if they were left alone to withstand Philip, he was likely to effect the passage of Thermopylae, and so have unhindered access into Central Greece. To this_exclu4- ing clause, therefore, strong opposition was^made by Demos- i thenes and other patriots ; but the Macedonian plenipotentia- " ries were firm in insisting upon it, and philippizing Athenian orators, such as Philokrates and ^schines, represented that the refusal to admit Phokis to the treaty by no means indicated hostile designs on the part of Philip against that state, but was due to his unwillingness to offend the enemies of Phokis, the Thebans and Thessalians, with whom he was on friendly INTRODUCTION, XXIU terms. The Athenians, in their desire for an end of the war, sutfcred themselves to be persuaded, and, insisting only on the omission of the excluding clause from the letter of the convention, tacitly complied with its requirements by swear- ing in the presence of the Macedonian envoys the customary ratifying oaths, together with the representatives of their allies generally, but not of the Phokians. The ten Athenian 33 ambassadors were then du-ected by the people to make a second journey to receive the oaths of Philip and his allies (vi. 29). Now Philip was engaged at the time in pushing his conquests in Thrace, to the injury of Athens ; and as he was hkely to interpret his agreement with Athens so freely as to retain everything he could get up to the moment of com- pleting by his oath the ratification of the treat}^, it was important to check his operations as soon as possible. But in spite of the remonstrances of Demosthenes, the embassy lingered in Athens, loitered on the wa}^, and finally refused to go to Philip in Thrace, but waited for him at Pella, his > capital. Fifty days after their departure from Athens, Philip returned home, having in the interval captured stronghold after stronghold on the Thracian coast, of which some, as Serrhium and Hieron Oros, had been occupied by Athenian garrisons shortly before peace negotiations began (ix. 15). At Pella, embassies from Sparta, Thebes, Phokis, aiid other 34 Greek states, as well as that from Athens, awaited him. With these in his train, he marched on into Thessaly, all the while leading the Phokians to believe that he meant them no harm (ix. 11), and holding out hopes of advantage to every- body. Finally, on reaching Pherre, he swore the Peace of Philokrates, and the Athenian envoys took their departure,! arriving at Athens about the middle of the summer of 346, i after an absence of seventy da^s. Demosthenes was now 35 thoroughly alarmed at the position of affairs, and at a meet- ing of the senate (/SovAtj), of which he was a member, he coujm'ed the city not to abandon Therinop^daj and the Pho-| xxiv INTRODUCTION. kians. But in the assemblj- (eKK/V/^o-ta) of the following day, ^schines still held out his encouraging assurances : I'liilip meant no harm to the Phokians, but would humljlc Thebes and rebuild the cities of Thespian and Platjea (see § 5) ; he ' would hand over Eubcjea (see § 41) to Athens as a price for Amphipolis (see § 15), to which the Athenians still fondh' cherished their claims ; he would even, so ^schines hinted, re-attach to Attica the frontier town of Oropus, which, twenty years before, had passed into the hands of Thebes (vi. 29, 30 ; ix. 11 ) . In vain did Demosthenes protest. The people pre- ferred agreeable falsehoods to disagi-eeable truths, and laughed approvingly when Philokrates cried out, " No wonder, men of Athens, that Demosthenes and I do not think alike ; for he drinks water, but I, wine " (vi. 30) . A vote of the people ex- tended the peace to the descendants of the contracting parties (vi. 31), and demanded of the Phokians the surrender of the f temple at Delphi to its immemorial defenders, the Amphik- t^'ons. Deserted thus b}' Athens, the Phokian arm}- capitu- lated, and Philip, l>eing now unhindered at Thermopjlse (vi. 7, 35), entered at once into Central Greece. 36 He concealed his designs no longer. At a meeting of the Amphiktyonic Assemljl^', held soon after, not only were the Phokians forever excluded from the Amphiktjonic League, and their votes transferred to Philip and his successors, but the annihilation of the Phokian nation was decreed. This de- cree was speedily executed. The cities of Phokis were de- stro3'ed, and their inhabitants scattered into villages (ix. 19, 23) . Many fled the country, which became a scene of deso- lation and misery. The Thebans and Thessalians, on the other hand, whose forces had joined Philip (vi. 14), received substantial benefits. In the interests of the Thebans the walls of Orchomenus, Koroneia, and Korsise, three Boeotian towns which had sided with Phokis, were razed, and all Boe- otia was again united under Thebes (vi. 13) ; while the Thes- salians, besides recovering the IJuAaia, or leading place in the INTRODUCTION. XXV Amphiktj'onic Asscmbl}- and in the a(lministra,tion of the Tem- ple of Delphi, were presented with the fortress of NikiEa near Thermopylffi, and had the district of Magnesia (see § 21) restored to them (vi. 22). Finally, to Philip himself, to- gether with the Thebans and Thessalians, the Amphiktyonic Assembly assigned the presidency of the Pythian games (ix. 32). Philip, in fact, had forced his way into the circle of Hellenic nations, and became henceforth the generally recog-" nized champion of the ancient Amphiktyonic League. The Years of Nominal Peace (346-340). Rudel}- as the expectations of the Athenians had been dis- 37 a[)pointed, the city could not do better than accept the state of things which her own foil}' had brought about. Philip, on his side, was disposed to abide for a time b}' the terms of the Peace, at least to the extent of alistaining from direct aggi'es- sions upon Athens, though he was far from construing that convention, as Demosthenes does (ix. 17), to requh-e him to suliside into inactivit}'. On the contrary, he was constantly bus}' in strengthening and extending his power. After an expedition against the lUjTians and Dardanians, he tightened his hold upon Thessal}' by occup3'ing with a Macedonian garrison rebellious Pheroe (ix. 12), by re-appropriating the harbor-revenues (see § 21), and by putting the whole country under the control of a board of ten of his partisans (vi. 22) . In the Peloponnesus, likewise, he made himself felt. Here, 38 Sparta was, as usual, in a state of hostility toward Argos and INIessene, the latter of which states she was seemingly trying to recover (see § 5) ; but Philip demanded the recognition by Sparta of Messenian independence (\'i. 13), and sent mer- cenaries to Argos and Messene, whom he promised to follow speedily in person (vi. 9, 1")). With a view to counteracting his efforts in this quarter, the Athenians sent an embassy into the Peloponnesus, on which Demosthenes served. But the xxn INTRODUCTION. warnings which the orator addressed to the Argives and Messenians against trusting Philip (vi. 2(3-25), tliough well 39 received at the time, worked no lasting eftect (vi. 2(j). Ae- cordingl}', a little later, at some time in the ^ear 344, envoi's from these states came to Athens to complain of the Athenian adhesion to Sparta. It is presumable that this embassy was instigated b^- Philip, and indeed, according to one account, envoi's from Macedon, arriving at the same time, joined their voices with those of the Peloponnesians. Thus the assembty which met to hear the message of the ambassadors, and, in then' presence (vi. 28), to vote a repty, had reall}^ to con- sider, under one of its aspects, the reigning question of the time, the question how to deal with Philip. It was on tliis occasion that Demosthenes delivered the Second Philippic, an oration which merel}' sen'cd to introduce the reading of a paper proposed by the orator as a suitalile reph' to the envoys. The harangue urges the Athenians to be watchful against the king, and denounces the philippizing part}' in the cit}'. As for the repl}' itself, its tenor can onh' be guessed, for the document is lost. ' ' The tone of the speech leads us to sup- ' ' pose that the repty made no material concession ; . . . yet " it so far satisfied Philip and his allies as to avoid an open "rupture." (Thirlwall, Hist. Greece, ch. xlv.) 40 Other Peloponnesian states besides Argos and Messene passed under Phihp's control. The Arcadians were devoted to him ; and in Elis a philippizing part}^ overthrew the exist- ing government and attached the state to the interests of Macedon (ix. 27). North of the Isthmus, in Megara, a similar attempt was made, but this failed, apparentl}' through the exertions of Athens (ix. 17, 27). Again, the island of Euboea, whose alliance the Athenians had secured in 357 (see § 6), had earty become an object of Philip's intrigues (see § 21) . In 350, discords, seemingly fomented by him, had broken out there, the Athenians had taken sides with Plutarch, tyrant, of Eretria, who, after betraying them, had quitted the INTRODUCTION. xxvii island with his mercenaries (ix. 57) , and all Euboea had been added to the list of Philip's allies. Still, in the principal cities, 41 phil-Athenian parties maintained themselves or revived. In Chalkis, such a party succeeded in 343-2 in effecting an alliance with Athens, while in Eretria and Oreos the philip- pizers carried the day. Thus in Eretria the Macedonian faction, headed by Klitarchus, was strong enough to cause the dismissal of an Athenian embassy (ix. 66), and finally to expel their opponents (ix. 57), who took refuge in the port of Porthmus. Philip then sent mercenaries under Hip- ponikus, razed the fortifications of Porthmus (ix. 33), in- stalled Klitarchus and two others as tyrants of Eretria, aiid frustrated two attempts of the banished citizens to reinstate themselves (ix. 58). Similarly, in Oreos, the resistance of- fered b}' Euphrffius to the philippizing party was of no avail. He was thrown into prison, where he committed suicide, and Macedonian troops assured the possession of the city to its tyrants (ix. 12, 33, 59-62). An expedition in the winter of 343-2 against Arj-bbas, 42 king of the Molossians in Epirus, afforded Pliilip an oppor- tunity to threaten Ambrakia and Leukas, Corinthian posses- sions, to conclude an alliance with the ^tolians, under the promise of seizing for them Naupalvtus, occupied at the time b}' an Achtean garrison (ix. 27, 34), and in other ways to strengthen himself in that quarter. Fears were aroused that he would in person cross over into the Peloponnesus. The Athenians now bestirred themselves, sent an embassy, con- sisting of Demosthenes and other patriots, through the Pelo- ponnesus, to stir up resistance to Philip's schemes ; and by deeds, as well as words, presented so determined a front that his movements were arrested (ix. 72). On his return march, the king, in order still further to take 43 from Thessaly the power of dissension and resistance, estab- lished tetrarchs, one over each of the four districts, Thessa- liotis, Phthiotis, Pelasgiotis, and Hestiseotis (ix. 26) . These xxviii INTRODUCTION. tetrarchs, though Thessahans, were creatures of his, and he directed the admiuistration of the countrj' (ix. 33).. At the same time he occupied with Macedouian troops Nikaea, near Thermopylae (see § 36), and Echinus in soutliern Phthiotis, though the latter city, Boeotian b}* origin, was claimed by Thebes (ix. 34). These measures accomplished, he abstained for a while from further aggressions in Greece, and opened a new campaign in Thrace, with the determination now to com- pletel}" subdue that region (ix, 27), Not until the winter of 339-8 did Philip appear again south of Mt. Olympus. The Rene-wal of Hostilities and Subjugation of Greece. 44 During the period in which the Peace of Philokrates con- tinued to be nominalh^ observed, the patriotic party in Athens, headed by Demosthenes, had been steadil}' gaining ground. Shortly after the conclusion of that convention, Philokrates, its chief author, was impeached, and, on his flight from the cit}', was condemned to death in his absence. And later, when ^schines was brought to trial by Demosthenes for un- faithfulness in the discharge of his duties as ambassador to Macedonia (see §§ 33 ff,), a large minority of the dikasts gave their votes for condemnation, 45 In the closing scenes of the struggle for independence, Demosthenes stands forth conspicuously as the leader, not only of his own cit}', but of all the independence and patriot- ism that remained in Greece. It was events in Thrace which drew Athens anew into open conflict with Philip. The Athenians had acquired, in 357, a precarious hold upon the Thraciiin Chersonese, with the exception of the important town of Kardia on the isthmus, which ultimately allied itself with Philip (ix. 35) ; and, by way of securing their posses- sion more eflfectually, a body of kleruchs was sent thither, in 843, under the command of a certain Diopeithes (ix. 15). INTRODUCTION. XXIX These settlers got into a quarrel with the Kardians, and when 46 Philip supported the latter with troops (ix. 16), Diopeithes retaliated by collecting a force and making a raid into Thrace. Philip then sent to Athens a letter, remonstrating and threat- emng (ix. 16, 27) ; but, though in the assembly which met to consider this communication, the policy of peace at any price was urged by many, Demosthenes, in his oration On the Chersonese, defended Diopeithes so vigorously that he was allowed to retain his command, and no concession was made to the king. Not long after, say in the summer of 3 41^ the- Third Philippic was delivered. It would seem that the de- bate of which this speech is a product was occasioned by a request for help from the settlers in the Chersonese (ix. 73), and that the earlier speakers confined themselves to the dis- cussion of Thracian affairs (ix. 19) ; but to the view of Demosthenes the question of the hour was one of far wider scope. It was a question of peace or war, a question which touched the honor and the very existence of all Hellas. All the energy of the orator's nature, all his power of kindling , / emotions in an audience, all his rare pan-Hellenic patriotism, found expression in the Third Philippic. This, the latest of Demosthenes's parliamentary harangues, is also the most elo- quent and the noblest, i The prosecution of Pliihp's plans of conquest in Thrace 47 had soon brought him into collision with his allies (see § 23) , the Perinthians and Byzantines, whom he had accordingly ' ^ prepared to attack (ix. 34). But before the siege of these towns had actually begun, the Athenians, acting on the advice urged by Demosthenes m the Third Philippic X§§_71 ff.;, strained every nerve to brmg about a general alliance against the aggressor. In this the}^ had no small success. Euboea was liberated of its tyrants and joined hands with Athens. Better still, the wisdom and the eloquence of Demosthenes effected a reconciliation between Athens and the cities of Perinthus and Byzantium (cf. § 10) , which, on being attacked XXX INTRODUCTION. by Philip, in 340, were so effectively supported by their friends, that the king was baffled and withdrew. At the call of Athens, which had now openly- annulled the Peace of Philoki'ates, Megara, Achsea, Corinth, Leukas, and Kerkyra ralhed round the standard of libert3\ More than all, Thebes, the long-standing foe of Athens and friend of Philip, was induced, through the efforts of Demosthenes, to change its front and co-operate vigorously in the work of defence. 48 At this moment the resistance which Demosthenes had been making for years with such keen foresight, such burning zeal, such unsullied and catholic patriotism, to the stead}- advance of conquest, seemed about to be successful. But the task was too great. The opposing armies met for a decisive con- flict at Chaeroneia (338 b.c.) and the overwhelming victory ")f Philip annihilated forever the independence of Greece. For some years Demosthenes lived in honor in his own city, and the speech On the Crown, delivered in 330, was at once his greatest oratorical effort and the successful vindication of his whole puljlic career. Yet even this measure of good for- tune was not to last. The hatred of his enemies at home and abroad gathered strength, and his exile from Athens and the self-infiicted death by which he escaped a more ignominious de.ith at the hands of the Macedonians (322 b.c.) closed with a c rtain tragic fitness the history of his heroic, unavail- ing contest. Athenian Financial and Military Systems. 4^ The principal ordinary sources of the Athenian revenue were these: (1) the rent of public property, especially the silver-mines ; (2) the taxes paid by resident aliens (/teVotKoi) ; (3) export and import duties and market dues ; (4) judicial fees and fines ; (5) the contributions (o-uFra^'eis) of members of the confederacy. It is to be observed that there was, in general, no direct tax imposed upon th^^ citizens. There was. INTRODUCTION. XXXl however, something not wholly dissimilar in that peculiar arrangement of the Athenian constitution which required wealthy citizens from time to time to discharge for the public good certain services, called liturgies. These were of two kinds: (1) Enc3'clic or ordinarj' litiu'gies, having to do with the celebration of religious festivals, and recurring, therefore, at stated intervals. Of this class the most costty were the cJioregia and the gymnasiarchy, consisting respectively in the formation, maintenance, and training of a chorus for a dra- matic or musical performance, and in the oversight and sup- port of athletes preparing to compete in a gymnastic contest (iv. 36) . (2) Extraordinarj^ liturgies, necessary only in time of war. Here belongs especially the trierarchy, which in- volved heavier pecuniary sacrifices than any of the preceding class. In the fifth century, b.c, each trierarch received from the state a war-ship, of which he had to take charge for one year ; and, though the state supplied pay for the crew, the trierarch, if patriotic, often expended, in putting and keeping his vessel in a sea-going condition, in securing, by payment of bounties, the most competent seamen possible, and so on, from forty minse to a talent ($720-$ 1,080). But in the fourth century, a number of men usually combined to perform a single trierarch}'. As to the details of the method by which 50 the various liturgical obligations were apportioned on any given occasion among members of the wealthy classes, we are imperfectly informed. But we know that when an appointee considered himself less bound to undertake the burden as- signed him than some one else who had been passed over, he could demand of such person to make a complete exchange of property with himself (dvTtSoo-ts) , or else assume the liturgy. If the demand was refused and both parties persisted, the ques- tion would be brought to trial before the proper magistrates, who, in case the}' decided against the defendant, would give him the option of the alternatives proposed by the plaintiff. Suits of this kind (ui/tiSoo-ci?) were especially common in the XXxii INTRODUCTION. time of Demosthenes, when men resorted to all means for escaping from sacrifices for the public good, and they must evidently have done serious evil in delajdng naval prepara- tions in times of need (iv. 36). 51 The revenue, whose sources have been enumerated above, was more than sufficient to carry on the government in tune of peace. There was, therefore, an annual surplus, most of which, in the fifth centirry, was habitually laid bj^ as a war- fund. Pericles, however, had introduced the custom of dis- tributing to poor citizens, at those Dion3-siac festivals which were celebrated with dramatic representations, the sum of two obols apiece, to pay the price of admission to the theatre. The moneys thus distributed were called ^cwpt/ca (sight-seeing moneys), and afterward, when it became the practice to make similar distributions on the occasion of other than the Dionysiac festivals, the same name was made to cover all these. After the Peloponnesian War a separate The6ric Fund was established, which soon came to absorb the entire surplus revenue. From this Fund some expenses incuiTcd by the state in the celebration of religious festivals, e.g., for sacrifices, seem to have been defrayed, but the bulk of it was apparentl}' spent in multiplied distributions at the festivals, no longer now to the poor alone, but to rich and poor alike. How much the Thedric Fund usually amounted to, it is, un- fortunatel}', impossible to determine ; but there seems no room for doubt that the uses to which it was put were in great part inexcusable and pernicious. Hence we find De- mosthenes repeatedly urging the application of this money to war pui-poses, which measure, however, he did not suc- ceed in carrying through until just before the battle of Cha^roneia. 52 The highest military officers in Athens were the ten gen- erals (o-rpaTTyyot) , who had supreme command of the army and navy in time of war, and who also exercised sundry ad- minis^jative and judicial functions at home. Subordinate to INTRODUCTION. XXX1H the generals were, for the infantry, the ten taxiarehs, or com- manders of battalions, and, for the cavalry, the two hipparchs and their sub-ofRcers, the ten ph^larchs. These officers were annually elected, no matter what the state of the country might be, but, with the exception of the thousand knights (tTTTTfts), who were annuall}' chosen from the two highest propert3'-classes, and were liable to military service in time of war, nothing like a standing army was ever maintained in Attica. In like manner the fleet, in which the strength of Athens 53 always lay, was not kept, in time of peace, in readiness for active service. In the fourth century, B.C., the Athenian | navy, though less well cared for than before, was still superior to that of any other state, numbering as it did from three to four hundred triremes. Of these, some were used only as transports for infantry (rpiT^pets o-rpaTtaWtScs) or cavalry (rptTypcis iTTTrayojyot) , while others were proper ships of war (rpiT/pets raxerat). There were, besides, ships of burden (TrXota), which carried provisions, equipments, etc., for the use of an expedition. The population of Attica may be roughly estimated at 54 500,000, among whom only about 90,000 were citizens, the remainder being made up of 45,000 resident aliens or metics, and 365,000 slaves. Of the adult male citizens, whose num- ber may be put at 20,000, those between the ages of 19 and 58, inclusive, were hable to be called upon, by a vote of the popular assembly, to perform military service. The metics also were sometimes drafted, and even the slaves were em- ployed in war, especially as oarsmen and sailors. In the time of Demosthenes, however, the Athenians commonly hired mercenaries to conduct then- expeditions (see § 7). The usual pay of a foot-soldier was two obols (six cents) 55 per day as wages (/xia-Oos) , and the same amount as provision- money {(TLTrjpia-Lov, Tpof^iri) ; that of a cavalry-soldier three times as much. The crew of a ship of war numbered two XXxiv INTRODUCTION. liuiidred men, who received, on the average, as much as in- fantry soldiers, so that the wages and provision-mone}' of one crew would amount at least to forty minae ($720) per month. Mercenaries seem to have been engaged on the same terms as citizens. 56 Now since, in the Age of Demosthenes, there was no reserve-fund on which to draw in time of war (see § 51), military and naval expenses could not be properly met except b}' imposing a property-tax (cio-^opa) on the citizens. Such a tax was regarded as a species of extraordinary litm'g}', and was submitted to with great reluctance. As far as possible, it was evaded, and in the consequent failure of Athens to pa}' her troops lay another cause of her inefficiency in war (see§ 8). Athenian Legislative Bodies. 57 The Athenians had two legislative bodies, the ^ovXij and the iKKX.7](TLa. Of these, the former was composed of five hundred men, fifty ft-om each tril)e, annually chosen by lot. Thus the Boule fell into ten tribal groups, and these took turns, each for a tenth part of the 3'ear, in assuming the chief responsibilities of the entire bod3% During this period of pre- cedence the members of the group were called prytcmes, whence their term of office went by the name of p't'ytany. Out of the number of the prytanes a president {eTn(TTa.Ty]IAinnOT A. W^ PnH. Et /aev irepi Katvov tlvo<; TrpdyixaTO'^ irpovTideTOi ] b> duhpe's ^ AdrjualoL, \4yeiv, eincr^cov dv ea>9 ol TrXet- (TTOi T(ov eloidoTOiv yi^cofxyju d7r€(f>y]uavTo, ei fMei/ rjpi- (TKe tC fxoL r(i)v vno tovtcou prjOei^rcou, riov^iav dv 5 rjyov, el Se /xyj, tot dv avro? iTreLpaifirjv a yLyvaxxKco \eyeiv • iireihr) Se virep Sxv TToWdKi<^ elptJKacTLv ovTOL TrpoTepov cru/x/3atVet /cat vvvl (TKOTrelv, rjyov- fxaL Koi 7Tpa>To<; ai/acrrct? et/corw? av crvyyvoifjir)'; Tvy')(aifew. el yap Ik tov irapekrjkvOoTO'^ xpovov 10 Tct SeovTa ovtol crvvefiovXevcrav, ovSev dv v/x.a9 vvv eSet fBovXevecrd at. TlpoJTOv (J,€v ovv ovK dOvjxrjTeov, a) dvope (f)poPTL[,eLv o)v eyjyrjv. el 8e rt? vixoiv, oi dv- Spe? ^AdrjpoLOL, hvcnroXejxrjTOv oterat roi^ ^'iknnrov elvai, (TKOTTOiv TO re TrXrjOo<; r^? vTrap^ovcrr)'; avT(o is Swdixecoq /cat to to. -^copca irdura drroXoiXivai rfj TToXeL, 6pdo)IAinnOT A. g TToXefJLOv fcet/xeva iv yLEcro), ^vcrei S* VTrdp^ei to7<; napovcn'^a to)v airovTOiv Kctl tol? iOeXovcn novelp Kttt KLPOvuevELv TO, T(t)v ajxekovvTOiv. Kol yap tol 6 TavTT) ^T^cra/xevo? tt) yuojixrj iravra KorecrrpaTTTai 5 /cat e^et, ra yuto^ &)? ctz/ eXwi' rt? e^ot TroXe/xoj, to, Se (TVjJLfia^a /cat (^tXa TTOirjcrdp.evo^ • Kat yap cru/^jaa- ^eti^ /cat TTpocre^eiv tov vovv tovtoi^ ideXovcrtu airavTe^, ov? a^* opCxji Trapecr/cevacTjaeVovs Kat Trpdr- TELV iOiXovTa'; a XPV' ^^ Toivvv, a> dvSpe az^- Sjoe? ^ KOrjvaioi, nore a XPV Trpd^ere ; eTrethdv tC yevrjiuL ; eVetSav ptj At' avdyKt) 7). ^'w 8e rt ;)(pi7 rd ytyvofxeva rfyelcrOai, ; eyat [xev yap oiofxat rot? w iXevOepoL<; pieylcrTiqv dvdyKiqv rrjv virep tmv irpay- [jbdrcov ala^vvqv elvat. r) /^ovXeaOe, eiTre jxol, Trepu-' toi^res avTCtiv irvvOdveaO ai • " Xeyerat rt Kaivov ; yivoiTO yap dv tl Kaivorepov rj Ma/ceSw^' dvrjp 'A0rj- i -.^ vatov^ KaranoXeixcov /cat rd tcov 'EXXijuayu OLOiKa>v ; is il " Te6ur]Ke ^tXtTTTTOS ; " " ov /act At', dXX' da-Oeveir TL 8' u/u.ti/ hia^ipei ; /cat ydp cti^ oSro? rt TrdOr), ra^eoj? u/xet? erepov ^iXiinrov TTOLijcreTe, av irep oijTCti irpocre^Te rot? Trpdy fxaai tov vovv ovoe ydp ^ ^ ovTO's Trapd ttji/ avTov pcoixrjv ToaovTov eTrrjv^rjTaL 20 12 oorov Trapd ttjv rjfxeTepav d/xeXetav. /catrot /cat TovTo • et rt TrdOov /cat rd rrj? TV)(r)IAiniIOT A. 7 n? fjL€u ovv Set TO. irpocri^Kovra iroieiv ideXouraq 13 VTrap^eiv arravra^i erot/AO)?, w? iyucoKorcou vjjlwv kol TreireKT fxevoiv, Travofxat Xiyoiv ' top 8e Tpoirov Tr]9 av rj OLaXvcrMfxeOa TreicrdevTeq rov TroXejxov rj TreptyevwfxeOa t(ov i^OpSiv • ovto) ydp ovk€tl tov XoLTTov 7racr)(OLfX€v av fcafcoi?. oljxat tolwv iyo) 20 Tavra Xiyeiv e^eiv, pjr) KOiXvoiv ^ et Tt9 dXA.09 iiray- yeXXerat rt. 17 p.€v ovv v7r6cr^e(Ti<; ovrco jxeydXr), TO oe Trpdyjxa yj^rj tov eXey)(ov Bcoaet • KpiToX 8* v/xet? eo-e(T$€. UpcjTov [xev TOLWV, &) dvBpeq * AOrjvaLoi, Tpirjpeiq 16 26 irevTrfKovTa napacTKevdaaaOat (fyrj/xL Selv, etr' av- Tov<; OVTO) ra? yv(Ofjia<; e)(€Lv o)?, idv tl Serj, nXeU'^ (TTeov et? raura? avrot? ifxjSdcnv. rrpoq Se tovtol^ (rot? r)ixLcr€(TL tojv Imrecov tTTTraycuyov? rptT^pet?) koX wXoLa LKOva eytpemcraL KeXevco. Taura fiev otjaat 17 3 TV ATTMOSOENOYS Selv virdp^etu eirl ra^ i^ol^i'r) Tovro e^ r^ yucofjiy} Trapda-rrjvai, w? v/xet9'e/c T7J9 d/xeXeta? ravri^? t']^? ayav) axnrep €t5 F^vfioiav s^a^) l^al Trporepov jrore ^acriv et? 'AXtapToi{)/cat|Ta reXev- '' p'*' 18 TaiqJTrp^r)p €t9 IIt>Xa9, tcrw? av op/xT^cratre. ourot V TravreXoi? ovS* et /u-t) TTOirjcraiT av tovto, a>9 eycoye .^jUU ^T^jat Seu^, €VKaTd(l)p6vr)T6v icTTLv', or "^ ota tw <^o-^ ^ot* etSft)? evrpeTreLS v/xa? (etcrerat yap d/cpt^cu?* lo etcrt ydp, etcrtv ot ttolvt i^ayyeWovref; eKeivo) Trap J 7]fjL0)v avTOiv TTAetov? Tov oeoz^To?) lycrv^tai^ ^?7' ''? TTapiScov Tavra a(f)vXaKTO<; A.r)(f)0y, /xT^oew? ovto<; i.tdC 19 Kaipov. ravra jxev icTiv a iracn oeod^^at ^i^/xt is Seu^ /cat trapecTKevdcrOai vpocnJKeLv ot/xat • VpoS Se TOVTOiv ^vvayiiv riva, a) dvope^ KOr^ycuoi, (ji'rjixi npo- ^eipicracruai oeiv v/xa?, 7^ crui^e^oj? TToAe/xTycret /cat KaKO)^ eKeivov iroiiqcreL, jxtj /xot ixvptov? fjL7]0€ otcr- fxvpLov^ ^€POv^, /xT^Se ' rd? enLcxTokLfjLaCovs raura? 20 Svi^d/xet"?, dXX '^ T779 TToXew? ear at, [kou v/xet9 ei/a Kav ttXelovs Kau Tov oeiva Kav ovrivovv 'vetpoTovrj- ut' ii (T'r]Te (TTparriyov, TovTU) Treiaerai /cat aKokovoiqcreir' » ^c"^ 20 '<^a't rpo^Tjv ravirj Tropicrai /ceXei^w. ecrrat 8' auxT^ Tt? T^ Swayat? Kat Trocrr), Koi Trodev ttjv rpo(f)r)v e^et, 25 Kat TTOJ? ravr eOeXrqcrei TTOielv ; iyo) (^pacrco, /ca^' eKacTTOv rovTOiv hie^tayv ^wpt?. ^ivov<^ fxei^ Xeycj — /cat OTTftJ? /X77 TTOiTjaeTe ^ o TToXXct/ct? v/xct? e/BXa^eu • TTOLVT iXaTTCo voixlt,ovTe<5 elvat tov Seouro's, /cat rd RATA /cat rovro (fypacrco /cat oetgw, ineLoav, '' StoTt TiqXiKavTiqv ano^^prjv oipai ttjv O'vvapLv Kat TToXtra? TOV? cTTpaTevopevov; elvat KeXevo), OLoago). ''^ 20 TocravTrjv ^:UJL> ^ avSpes 'AOrjvaXoL, otct raura, ort 23 ou/c €vt i^w T^/z-t^' TTopicracrOai oiJvapLv ttjv eKetvco napaTa^opevqv, aXXa XrjcrTeveLv avayKiq /cat tovtoj tS Tponcp tov TToXepov xprjaOai ttjv TrpcoTrjv • ov '*'^^ TOLvvv vTTepoyKov qvTTJv {ov yap ecxTi piaOo'^ ovoe 25 Tpocfiiq) ovSe iravTeXax; TaTreivrjv elvai Set. TToXtra? S_e napelvai /cat crvpirXeLv Std ravra /ceXeuw, ort /cat TrpOTepOV TTOT aKOVCi) ^eVLKOV Tpe(f)eLV iv 1^0pLVUQ)> TTjv ttoXlv, OV HoXvcTTpaTo^ TjyeLTO Kat \^iKpaTr]<; Kat Xa,8pta9 /cat dXXot rtve?, Kat avTov^ vfta? (nj- 10 IV. AHMOSGENOTS 24 (TTpctTevecrd at • /cat otSa olkovcjv otl AaKeoaifxoviov? TraparaTTOfJiei'OL fxeB" vjxoiv ivLKcou ovtol ol ^ivoi /cat VfX€L<; ixer eKeuxov. eq ov o avra tcau avra ra ^ei/iKCL vfuu (TTpareveTai, tov'^ <^tXov9 i^t^a /cat tov<; crup.p.(X)(ov<;, ol 8' i^Opol /xet^ovs roO Seo^'ro9 yeyo- 5 vacTiv. /cat irapaKv^avTa evrt ro^' r^? 7rdX.eaj9 TrdXe- ftot', 77/009 ^ KpTa^atpv /cat iravTa^oi fxaXkov ot^erat irkeovTa, 6 Se ctt pariqyo'^ aKoXovdei, et/cdrco?* ou yap 25 ecrrtf ap^eiv (jltj StSwra [xlctOov. rt ow /ceXevcu; ra? 7rpo(f)dcreL<; d^eXett' /cat rov crrpaT'iqyov Kat t&ji^ w CTTparioiT^v, jXLcrOov iroptaavTa^ Kat (XTpaTioiTaq ot/cetov? wcnrep i7r67rTa<; rdv o-rp avope<^ KoiqvaioL ; , [xa At ov^ T^jLtet? i5 26 ye." eiTToir au, " aXXa tA.t7r7rw Tro\ep,ovp.€i>. ovk i)(eLpoTovetTe Se e^ vficov avTcov 8e/ca ra^tap^ov? /cat (rTpaT7)yov<; Kat ^vXap^ov? /cat lTnrap^ov<^ Svo ; rt oSt' ovTot TTOtovcrti/ ; ttXt);/ ez^o? di^Spd?, 6i/ at' eKTrefx- xfir)Te iirl rov noXeixou, ol Xolttol ra? Tro/xTra? TrejXTrov- .20 (Ttv v/xtf /zero, tojv lepoiroicDV • axnrep yoLp ot TrXar- Toi^re? rov? TrrjXLvov^, et? tt7v ayopav -^eipoToveire Tov? ra^tctp^ov? /cat rov? (fyvXdp^ov?, ovk im toj/ 27 TToXefxop. ov yap i^rjv, w di>^pe<; ^ AdrfvaloL, ra^idp- ^ov? Trap' vp-oiv, iTnrap^ov Trap vjxoiv, ap^ovTa dpecTKy, ^eipoTovrjcreTe, iva prj povov iu rot? xfjr)(f)Lcrpaai /cat iu rat? e7rto"ToXat? TToXeprJTe tXt777r6j, dXXd /cat rot? epyoLS. X2 IV. AHMOSGENOYS 31 AoAcetre Se /xot ttoXv /bVXrtoj' ai^ Trepi tov TroXe/xov /cat 0X17? Try? Trapa(TKevrj<; ^ovkev a acrd at, el tov to- TTOV, o) aV8pe9 " K6r)vaZoi, TrjtXt7r7ro9, Kat ov<; fXTj /SorjOeLaL'i TroXeyueiv {vcrTepiovixev yap airavTOiv) aWa napacTKevfi (Tvpe^el /cat Svz^a/xet. virdp^ei S' 10 u/xtv ^etjU,aStaj jitev ^(pyjcrOaL [Trj SwafxeLj AtJjjlpcp /cat ©acra» /cat %Kiddai /cat rat? e^ rovrcu tco tottw i^ri- orot?, e^ at? /cat Xt/xeVe? /cat crtro? /cat a ^^17 crrpa- TevjxaTL ndvB' vndp^eL • r^gi^ S' wpa// rou eTov^,(pTe /cat 7r/309 T^ yT^ yeveadai pdhiov koI to toxv Tivevfid- is Tcoi/ acr^aXeV, 7rpo9 aur^ T/^ X^P^f ^^^^ 7rpo<; rots rwv ijxTTopLcov cTTOfxaaL /aaStw? ecrrat. ^ /<^ dv avTa)v ^ovXevofxevoL /cat 34 irXeov ovhev Trotovvre?, /cat ert tt/do? tovto) irpcoTov 10 KATA IAinnOY A. 13 /xev, 0) dvope<; * KOiqvaioi, rov jxeytcrTov tmu eKetvov TTopoiv a^aipiqcrea-Oe. ecm 8' ovto'? tC<; ; oltto tojv vfxeTepoiv vfXLv TroXe/xet (Tvixp^d^cov, dyoiv /cat (jiipoiv TOv<; TT\eovTa<; ttjp OakarTav. eTretra rt tt/do? tovto) ; 5 '^v Trdcr^ew avrol Kaiio)^ e^oj yeurjcrecrOe, ov^ oicr- irep Tov TTapekOovTa ^ovov et? Arjfipoi' /cat 'ip^^pov iyi^akwv at^/xaXwrov? TroXtra? vjxeT€pov<; w^er' e)(cov, 77/309 T&> TepaiCTTa) to, nXola (rvXka/Boji' dfxv- 0r)Ta ^rjixaT e|eXe^e, ret reXevrata et? Mapadu)ua airefir] /cat rryi' tepaz^ 0,770 ttjs X(opa<5 io^er e)(oiv Tpirjpy), u/xet? 8' ovre ravra Swacr^e KOikveiv ovt et? Tou? xpovovf;, ov? cti/ irpodrjcrde, ^oiqOeiv. /cat- 35 rot Tt 017 TTore, w dvSpe<; ' AOrjvaLoi, vofjii^ere rrju fxeif TUiv UavaOrjuaicov kopTTjv /cat ttjv to)v Alovv- 15 crtcoi^ dec tov Ka6rJKOvTO ocrrji/ ovk olo et n to)v dTrdvTOiv €^et, rov? o drrocTTokov^ TTdvTa<; vpiu vcrrepit^eiv tcou Kaipotv, tov et? Medcovrju, tov et? ITayacra?, tov et? IIoTtSatav ; ort e/ceu^a /xe?^ dircw- 36 ra vopci) rera/crat, /cat irpoocSev eKao-ro? vputv e/c 7roXXov rt? ^oprjyo'^ rj yv^vaaiap^o^; Trj<; (^vX^?, 7roTe /cat napd tov koI tivol Xa^ovTa tl. Set noielv, ovSev dve^eTacTTov ovS' dopccTTOv ev tovtol'^ rjpeXy]- rat, iv Se rot? 7re/9t rov jroXep^ov koL tjJ tovtov TrapacTKevrj ara/cra dStopdcoTa dopicTTa anavTa. TOLyapovv a/xa dKrjKoapev tl Kai Tpirjpap^ovs /ca- 20 14 IV. AHMOSGENOrS BlcTTaixev Kcii tovtol<; ai^rtSocret? rroLovixeOa Koi irepl ^TjixaTOiv TTopov cTKOTTOvixeu, Kttt yu,era ravra eju,- /BaCveLu Tov<; jxeToiKovi eSo^e /cat tou? X^P^^ oIkovu- 37 Ttt?, etr' avTov o au e/c- 5 TTAecofxei' ' Tov yap tov irparTeiv ^ovou et? ro irapa- (TKevat^ecrO ai avaXicTKOfxev, ol Se tojv Trpayp^aroiv ov jxeuov(TL Kaipoi rrjv r^fxerepap ^paSvTrjra koI elpoi- veiav. a? he rov fiera^v ^ovov hvvdixei'^ olofjieO' rjjxiv vTrdp^eiv, ovoev olai re ovcraL ttolelu in avruiv m T(i)v KaipMv i^ekey^ovTai. 6 8' et? tovO' v^peoj<; iXyjXvdei' ojctt' iincrTeWeiv YLv/Soevcnp rorj TOiavTa<; eVtcrroXct?. EnilTOAAI. 38 TovTcov, o) dpope? ov)(^ r]oea dKO'uew. dXX' el jxep, ocra ap ri? vjrep/3rj tco Xoyw, ipa [jlt) Xvirrjcrrj, /cat ret irpdy ^ara vTrep^TjcreTaL, Set tt/oo? rjSoprjp SrjjxrjyopeiP ' el h' r] t6l)p Xoycop -^apL aVope? ^ A.6rjpaioi, (pepa- 20 Kil^eLP eavTov<;, koX dirapT dpajSaXXojxepov^ d ap y 39 hv(T)(eprj irdvTOiP vcrTepit^etp tcop epycop, /cat jxrjhe TovTo SvpacrOai fxaOeip, otl oet tov<; 6p6co<; TroXep.co -^poj/xepov; ovk dKoXovOecp rot? Trpayy^acrip, dXX avrov? ejXTrpoa-Oep eipai tcop TrpayfxdTCJp, /cat top 25 avTov TpoTTOP axTTTep TCOP o-TpaTevfjidT(i)v d^iotaeii Tt9 av TOP (TTpaTrjyop riyelcrdai, ovt(o /cat tcop npay- RATA ctVSpe? 'AOr^valoi, TrXeicr- 411 TT7I/ ovvafjiLP airoMTOJv e^oi^re?, rptt^pet?, OTrXtra?, itt- 5 77ea9, ^r)ixdT(x)v npocroSop, rovroiv [xeu l^^XP'' '^V'^ TTJfJiepou r]ix€pa<; ovSeul ncoTroTe et? Seoi' tl Ke)(prj(T0e, ovSeu o' wrrokeiTTere, oicnrep ol (^dp^apoi nvKTev- ovcTLv, ovToi TToXefxelu ^PlXlttttco. Kol yoip eKeivoiv 6 TrX'qyeL^ aet rrjs 7rXy]yrjtot ^ec3^' rt?, w ai^Spe? ^Adrj- 42 valoi, T0L<^ yLyvoixeuoL Sect Tovvu re a yiyvoiCKOi irdvd' arrXcoq, ovSev vno- crretXa/xet'o?, TTe7rappiqcria.(Tp.ai. i^ovXofxrjv 8* dv, 15 axnrep otl vyuv cru/x<^epet tol ^eXTiCTTa aKoveiv otSa, ovTOJS eloiuai crvvoZcrov Koix tco to. ySeXrtcrra ehrovTi • TTokkco yap av tjolov enrov. vvv o err aorjKoL^ overt rot? ttTTO TovTcov ifxavTO) yevrjcrofxevoLS, ojx(o<5 iiri Tca (Tvvoi(Teiv, idv irpd^rjTe, TavTa TreireicrOai Xiyeiv ao axpovp.ai. vLKcfrj 8' o tl Tracriv vp2v jieXXcL cruvoC- VI. KATA c&IAinnOT B. Otov, d) dfopef; ' A0r)vaLOL, Xoyot yiyvoiVTai nepi 1 6)V 4>tXt7r7ro? Trpctrret koL ^idt^eTai napd ttju elprj- vqv, aet tov^ virep -r^p^chv \6yov<^ koX StAcaiov? /cat ^iKavO pMTTOv; opco (jyaLvofxepoVi, koL Xeyecv fxeu 5 dTTavTatXt7r7rov, yiyi>6ix€vov S' ouSei/ o)? cTros elirelp Tbiv heovTOiu ovS' wi^ eveKa TavT aKoveiv a^tot') "^^ dXX' ets TovTO 1787^ Trporjyfieua rvy^dvei uduTa rd 2 Trpdyixara Trj TToXet, ctjSpe<; ' AOrjvaioi, TOv*^ oyawz/ r)\iKoa oterat Kivhvvov <^ipeiv tovto ttj irokei P'TT)^' icj)' vfJLa^; irdvTa TtapaaKevdt^ecrdai, Oavfxd/^a), Kol oerjOrjuaL irdvTOiv b^oioi^ vp.o)v ySouXo/xat rov^ XoyLcrixov<; aKovcrai, fjLov Sta fipa-^eoju, St' ov? rd- 20 vavrla iixol 7rapecrT7]K€ npocrooKav koL St' wt* e^- 6pov rjyovixaL ^Cknnrov, iv idv jxev iyoj ookoj jSeXxLov irpoopdv, ip-ol neLo-OrJTe, idv S' ot dap- povvTa Koi 7r€7ncrTevK6TetXt7r7ro9 Kvpio? npcoTov [xerd rrju elpTJurju KarecTTr) ; UvXmi' Kat tcov iv ^w/ceOcrt Trpayixarcov. Tt ovv ; TT(ov TTOPTOiv fjirjoepos dp /cepSov? rd KOLpd St/cata t(op 'FiXXyjpcjp irpoiaOai, jxrjK dpTaXXd^acrOai /xi^Se/Ata? ^dpiTOiXovs, CTTt rot? St/catot? alprjcrecrOai, el 8' eKeivoi^ TrpocrOelTo, crvvepyov'; e^eiv Trj<; avTov irXe- oue^iaw/cea9 i^vi/ (Tco^ei ; Kal Tt? ai' ravra Tricrrevcreiei/ ; iyo) fxeu yap ow 16 ai/ Tfyovixai ^iXiTnTOv, ovr et ra rrpiora jSiaadelf; 15 a/c&ji/ eTTpa^ei/ ovr av el vvv OLTreyiyi/cocrKe ©T7y8atov9, rot? eKeivoiv e^6poL<; avue^co's evavriovaOai, dXX' ci^' ait' t'vt' TTotet, KaKeiva e/c TT/ooatpeVew? SryXd? ecrrt TTOi'rj(Ta<;. e/c iravroiv o', av rt? 6p0(oo)i> St/catcu? oj^* avrov fxtcrelv 24 VI. AHM02GEN0Y2 vofXil^OL, /cat irapco^vvTai, TreCcrecrOai rt npocrho- K(iiv, av Kaipov \d/3r}Te, iav jxr) (f)6dcrr) Trotifcra? npoTepo^;. 3ta ravr i.yprjyopev,}e(j)i(TTrjKa^, im ry TToX^L Oepairevei Tivdy)v, " a) dvSpe^ MetronjvLOL, " Svcr^epo)? aKoveiv 'OXvpOlov;, et rt? rt XeyoL /caret " ^tXtTTTTov, /car' e/ceii^ov? rov? )(p6i'ovIAinnOT B. 25 " irpocTOOKav Trjv KaOecTTwcrav vvv ^eKahap^iav " ecrecT 0ai wap' avrot? ; ^ rov rrjv Tivkaiav oltto- " oouTa, TOVTOu ra? tSta? avrdv Trpocrohov; napat- " p-qcrecrOaL ; ovk ecrrt ravra. dXXa (jltju yiyove 5 '* ravra /cat iracriv ecTTLP elhevat. v/xet? 8'," ecjyyjv 23 iyco, " StSwra fiev koI vino-^ovixeuov Oeoipelre " ^ikiinrov, i^rjTTaTrjKOTa 8' '^877 /cat irapaKeKpov- " jjiivov aTTev-^ecrOe, el aox^poveire ^tj, tSeu/. ecrrt " roivvv vrj At'," €(^171/ eyw, " Trai^roSaTra evpr}fxei>a 10 " rat5 TToXecTi Trpo? cfivXaKrjv /cat croiTrjpiav, oXov " -^apaKcofJiaTa /cat Tei^rj /cat Tatfypoi /cat raXXa ocra " Toiavra, /cat raCra /xev iarriv airavTa ^eipoTroiy]- 24 " ra, /cat oaTTavrj^iTrpooSeiTaL^ ev Se rt koivov t) " (f)V(rL<; T(t)v ev ^povovvTOJv eu iavrrj /ce/cr^^rat ^v- 15 " XaKTTjpcov, o TTOLcn /xcV ecTTiv ayaOov koX ctcdtiJ- " piov, ixaXiCTTa oe rot? TrXiqOecn 7rpo<; tov^ rvpdv- " vov;. TL ovv ecrrt tovto ; dmcTTia. ravrrjv " (fyvXaTTcre, ravri^? duTe^ecrOe • ecti^ ravTrjv aco- " ^'qTe, ovSey [xri Seii^ov ndOrjTe. ri tjjTeiTe ; " 25 20 e(f)r]v. " iXevOepuap. elr ov^ opdre ^iXnnrov " aXXorptcurara? ravTTj /cat ra? Trpocrrjyopta'; e^ov- " Ta ; ;8acrtXev9 yoLp koI Tvpawo^ avra? i^Opoq " iXevuepCa /cat i>6fxoLtet9 ol koX (tvvl€vt€<; avToi koI Tiov XeyovT(ov dKo-uouTeiqv>T'Y)v ttoXlp, TrpovXeyop /cat oieyLapTvpo^xrqp /cat ovk eloip 30 wpoecrOaL UvXaq ovhe &>/cea?, Xeyopra^ w? eyco fiep vSojp TTlPOiP eLKOTCOq SvCTTpOTTO^ Kol SvCT/CoXo? elfJLi 25 Tt5 dp0p(t)7ro<;, cE>tXt7r7ros 8', onep ev^aiaO* dp v/xet?, eai^ TTapeXOrj, irpd^ei, /cat BecTTTta? jLto^ /cat IlXa- rata? ret^tet, (dr)/3aLov<; Se Traucret rrj? vftpeax;, Xep- povqaov Se rot? aurov re'Xecrt Stopv^et, EvySotai/ Se 10 KATA ^TAinnoT B. 27 Kat Tou flpcoTTOP avT AfX(f)i7r6\eo)<; vjx7v aTToSwcret • ravra yo-p airauTa em rov y8T7/xarotXt7r7ro? irpdrTei p.dWov rj 15 ra wi^t • TO yap Trpdyfia opco Tvpo/BaLuov, /cat ov^t 33 jSovXoifxrjv dv eiKat^eiv 6p6(i)<^, <^o^ov p.ai ok firj \iav eyyu? rf tovt rjoyj. orav ovv fxrjKeu vp-tv ap^ekeiv i^dvcTta ytyvTqrai tmv crvp/3aLv6vTO)v, p-^)^* dKovrjO^ ort TavT e<^' vpd<; icTiv ipov p^rjSe tov Setz^og, dXX' 20 avTol TrdvTe7 Trap vpoju 25 opyfi Trepnrecreiv crvp/Sfj • opco yap a»9 to. woWa y ivLov<; OVK et9 tov<; atrtov?, dXX et? tov<; vtto X^'-P^ p.d\i(TTa TTjv opyrjv d^te^ra?. ect)? .ow ert peXhei 35 /cat crvuLCTTaTaL Ta wpdypaTa /cat KoraKovopev dWrjfKoiv, €Ka(TTOv vp^iov, /catVep a/cpt^oi? etSora, 28 VI. AHMOSeENOYS RATA TAinnOT B. o/xfo? hravaixLixTrqcTKecrOai PovXofxai, tl<; 6 ^(oK€aajKea<;, dXX' rj to. St/cat' av eTToiei koX ttjv elpi^viqv ayoiv ricrvyiav el^ev, rj 7rapa)(prjix' av rjv ev ofJiOLco TToXefxco St' ov Tore Trj<; elprjvr)^ iTreOvixrj- ^5 37 crev. ravT ovv &)? jxev vTrofivrjcraL, vvv iKavo}^ eip-qTai, w? 8' av e^eTaaOeir) p.dXL(TT dKpi^u)<;, jxt) yevoiTo, oi Travre'; deoC • ov^eva yap ^ovXoijx'qv eyoiye dv, ovS' et St/cato? ear d-rroXajXevai, jxerd TOV irdvTOiv Kivhvvov Koi Trj<; ^r^^tas hiKrjv vtto- -i'- iXt7r- 7ro9, a^' ov TTjv elpiqvqv iTrotrjaaTo, ov fjLOvou v/xas, aXXo, Kol T0V9 aXXou? aoc/cet, /cat ttolptcov oto' ort 5 (fy-qcrdpTcoi' y av, el Kai jxr] ttolovctl tovto, Kai \iyeiv ^elv Kai TTpajTreiv 07r(t)<; e/ceti^o? TravcreTai r7J<; v/3pea)(; KOL SiKTjv Swcret, et? rovO' v-rrr^yixeva iravTa to. irpdyixara Koi irpoeifjiepa opco, (ocrre oeooLKa fxy] /3Xo.(T(f)r)ixop fiep elneLV, d\r]6€<; S' >) * ^l Koi \eyeiv 10 dnapTe^ i/SovXouTo ol iraptovTe'; Kai ^^eLpoTouelp v/jtet? eg wv w? cpavAOTaT efiekke ra Trpayixao egetp, ovK av rjyovfJiaL ovuacrOaL ^eipov rj vvv oiareOrjuaL. TToXkd fji€u ovv tcrci)? icrriv aiTia tovtojv, Kai ov Trap i €P ovSe hvo ei? tovto to. TrpdyixaTa d(fnKTai, fxaXi- 15 crra 8', dv Trep i^€Tdl,r)Te 6p0o)<;, evpyjcreTe Sid tov^; ^apit^eaOai jxdWov tj ret jSeXTicrTa \eyeiv npoaipov- lx€Pov<;, oiv Tive<; fiep, c5 duSpe'? 'Adrjvaioi, Iv ol<; ev- So/ct/xoOcrtv avTol Kai SvvavTai, TavTa (f)v\dTrouTe<; ovhe^jLiav nepl TOiv ^eWovTOiv npovoiav e^ovaiv, 20 erepoi Se tov^ evrt rot? Trpdyfxaaiu ovTa<; aiTKofxevoi Kai Sial3d\XovT6<; ov^ev aXXo rroiovaiv rj oiTbi<; rj TToXt? nap" avTy]<; hiKrjp XmheTai koI irepi tovt ecr- 30 IX. AHMO20ENOT2 rat, ^ikiTTTTco o i^ecTTai koL \eyeiv koX TrpdrreLv 6 3 Tt ySouXerat. at Se rotavrat TroXtretat avvrjOei^; fxev elcnv vfjup, alriai Se roiiv KaKcov. a^ioi S', w aVSpe? Aurji/aioL, iav tl roiv aXrjOwv fxeTa 7Tappr}crCa<; \eyco, fxyjSefXLai' /xot Sta rovro Trap' vfxOiv 6pyy)v ye- s veaOai. cTKOTreiTe yap wSt. vp.u<; ttjv Trapprjcriav im fieu T(i)v aXXwi^ ovrcu koivtjv olecrde helv eluat Tracrt rot? ev rrj ttoXci, oicrre kox toI% £0^019 /cat rot? oouXot? avTrjtXi7r7ro9, r^? 7rdA.ew9 o ov KeKpaTrjKeu • ouS' TJTTrjcrOe v/xei'?, dXX' ovSe KeKLvrjaOe. Et /xei' GUI' e^ecTTLU elpyjvrjv ayeuv rfj vroXet /cat 8 5 e^* i7/x«/ ecrrt rouro, tV ii^revOeu ap^o)p.ai, (ftrjfxl eycoye ojyeiv r][xa<; OELf, koI top ravra Xeyovra ypoi- (f>eLv /cat TrpoLTreiv koI jxr] <^€i^a/ct^eti^ d^tw • et S* eVe- po9 rd oVXa e^' ratg ^epalv e^cof /cat SwapiLv ttoWtju irepi avTov Tovpofia peu to TrjtXt7r7ro$ oiveiTai, avTO'i [xev TroXefieLu vfuv, vcf)' vfxojv Se imt} TToXefJielcrdaL. 30 Kat fXTfu el /jte^pt tovtov TrepL/Jiei^ovfJiei/, eco^ az/ 10 Tjixlu ofjioXoyiqcrrj 7^oXe/xet^', iravTOiv ecrixeu evrjOecrra- Tot • ou8e ydp av eirt T171' 'Arrt/c^t' avr'qv ^ahitprj /cat Toi^ Iletpatd, tout' epe2, et Trep ot? 77/309 tov? dXXov^ 7re7roi7)Ke Set t eK jxai peer 6 ai. tovto pev yap 1] 25 'OXwOioi^ TeTTapdKovT dire^oiv Trj<; noXeo)^ crrdoia etTTCz^ oTt oet ovoiv uaTepov, rj eKetvovs ev Ukvvtfq) pr] ot/cetf '^ avTov iv Ma/ceSot'ta, irdvTa tov aXXoz/ ^ovov, et Tt9 avTov avridcraiTO ti tolovtou, aya- vaKTOiP /cat TTpecr/BeLs irepniou tovs diroXoyrjcrope- 32 IX. AHM02GEN0T2 vov?' TovTo 8' et9 aj/ce'a9 w? 7rpo5 crufxixd^ov? iiropeveTo, koI TrpecrySet? &j/L(Trdura<; elprjurju ayeiv (jirjcrere, ew? av avrd roL<; rei^eaiv rj^r) Trpocrdyoicriv. aXX ov (f)'r](rere • 6 ydp, ot? dv iyoj XrjcfiOeLrji', ravra irpdrroiv Kai /caracr/ceva^o^e/^o?, ovros efioL iroXe- 25 jLtet, Kav jjLTJTro) l3dXXrj fxrjSe ro^evy. ricriv ovu v/xet? 18 /ct^'8vz^evo■atr' dv, et rt yevoiro ; rut rov EXX77- (TTTOvrov dXXorpLcodrjpat, ra> Meydpcou Kai rrj<; EvySota? rov noXeixovvO' vfjuv yevecrdai Kvpiov, ro) UeXoTTOvvrjcriov'; raKeivov (f)povrjaai. eira rov 34 IX. AHMOSGENOTS TovTO TO fXTj'^dur) ixa inl T-qv iroKiv icrravTa, rovrov 19 elpijurju ayeiv eyco (f)co 7rpo<; v/xa? ; ttoWov ye /cat Set, dXA.' d^' 7]<; i^/xepa? dvecXe f&oj/cea?, dno TavTY)<5 eyoiy avTou TToXe/xetv opitpyiai. u/xctg oe, edv djxv- vr](T06 'qSr], (7a)(f)pou'r](TeLV (^t^/xl, idu Se idcnqre, ovSe s Tou^' oxai/ fiovXrjcrde SvvijcrecrOc Troirjcrai. kox rocrovTOv ye d(j)ecrTrjKa twv dWcou, o) dv^pe^ ^ Kdiq- valoi, roiv CTvp.^ov\ev6v70iv , oycrre ovhe hoKeZ jxol nepl Heppovrjcrov vvv aKoirelv ovSe Bu^avnou, 20 dXX.' iirajxyvai jxev To{)ToitA.t7r7ro9 rjv^yjTat, /cat dmcrraj? /cat 20 crracrtacrTt/cct;? e^ovcri irpo'^ avrov? ot ''EXXi^i/e?, /cat ort TToXXoj TTapaoogoTepov rjv toctovtov avrov e^ eKeivov yevecrdai r] vvv, oO* ovto) TToXXd irpoeiXiqi^e, /cat TO, Xoiira vcf)* avTut noL'qcTacrdaL, koL irdvO' ocra 22 ToiavT dv e^ot/xt Sce^eXOelv, TrapaXeLxjjco. dXX' 25 opo) crvyKe^cjprjKOTa'? dnavTa^ dv6pa)7rovs, d(j) vjxwv dp^ajxevov?, avTco, virep ov tov dXXov diravTa ^ovov TTdvTe<; at voXefxai yeyovacnv ol 'EXXtjvlkol. Tl ovv icTTi TOVTO ; TO TTOielv 6 TL jBovXeTau, KCU 10 KATA *iAinnoT r. 35 Kau eva ovroicrX TreptKouTeLv koX Xmuo^vtelu t(op EXk-r^uwu, Kai KaTahov\ova6 ai to.^ TrdXet? eiriovTa. KaiToi Trpoa-TaTat [xev u/xet? k^'^ofxrjKovTa err) /cat 23 rpCa T(x)v '^EjWrjvoiv eyivecrOe, TrpocTTdrai 8e rptct- 5 KovTa €uo<; SeovTct Aa/ceSat/xwtot • la^vcrav Se rt Kai Syj^oLOi TovTovcrl tov^ reXevraiovg ^6vov<^ fiera ttjp iv AevKTpois ixdxrjv. aXX' o/iw? ou^' vfjuv ovT€ @r)^aiOL<; ovre Aa/ceSat/xo^'tot? ouScttw- TTore, ft) dvSpe<; ^ A.OiqvaloL, a-vve^ayprjOiq tov0' vtto T(i)v 'EXXiji^oji^, TTOLeii' o TL ^ovXoLcrBe, ovSe ttoXXov Set, aXXa tovto fxeu vp^iv, ixaXkov 8e rot? tot oixriv 24 'AOrjuaioLS, eTreiSij rioriv ov /xerptws iSoKovv Trpoa- tXt7r7ro9 kv TpLoi koI Se'/ca ov^ oXot? eTecTLU oi? avjiprjKev, cocrre jxrjS' el iroiTTOT (oKujOrjcrav TTpocreXOopT eluai paoiov elrreiv • /cat to ^oiKeoiv e0vo<; TocrovTov avrjpy^ixevov cricjirco. aXXa ©er- 5 raXta ttw? ej^et ; ov)(i ras TToXtreta? /cat ra? TrdXet? avTcou Trapjipiqrai /cat Terpap^ia^ KaTearrjcreu, iva jXT) jxovov Kara 73"oX.ets dA.Xa /cat /car' e^t'i^ SovXeu- 27 wcrtt' ; at 8' ei' Eu/3ota vroXetg ov/c t^St^ Tvpawovv- rat, Kat ravra o^ vyja-co irkiqcnov ^iq^iov /cat it 'AOtjvcou ; ov ^Lapp-qSrjv els ras eTTtcrroXa? ypd(f)ei,, " epoL o ecTTiv elprjvrj irpos tovs aKoveiv epov /Sov- Xopeuovs ' ; Kat ov 'ypdif^eb ph^ raVTa, rots 8' epyoLs ov TTotet, dXX e^' 'EXXi^crTrot'TOj' or^erat, irpoTepov 7]Kev eir Ap/BpaKLav, 'HXtt' e)(et nqkiKav- is Tiyt' TToXti^ ej/ ITeXoTrovz/T^croj, Meyctyoot? eire^ovXevcre vpcoyju, ovO^ Tj 'EXXd? ov6' rj /SdpjSapos rrjv rrkeo- 28 ve^Lap ^copel rdpOpcoTrov. Kat ravO" opoiVTes ol "YXk-qves arravTes Kat aKovoz^res ov TrepTTopeu TT/aecr^et? Trept tovtcjv Trpo? dXXT^Xov? Kat dyai/aK- 20 Tovpev, ovTO) oe KaKW? ZiaKetpeda kol Siopcopvy- pe0a Kara TroXet?, cjar ciyjn ttJs Tiqpepov rjpepas ovSep ovTe rcov crvptXt7r7rov /cat u)p eKelpo<; irpdrTei pvp, ov^ ovToyq e)(ovcrLP, ov popop ov^ "EXXr)vo<; 6mo<; ovSe npoaij- KOPTO^ ovSep rot? "EXXiqarLP, aXX' ovSe /Bap^dpov ePTevdev odep KaXov elneTp, dXX' oXedpov Ma/ceSo- 20 po<;, o0ep ovS' dpSpdnohop (nrovSoLOP ovSep rjp Trporepov. Katrot Tt ttJ? i(rxdTr)<; v/3pe(o<; diroXeiTrei ; ov 32 TTOo? T(o TToXet? dpTjpujKepaL Tidrjcn pep ra Ilv^ta, TOP Koipop roip 'EXXtjpojp dycopa, Kap auro? pr) 25 Trapfj, Tovtd^ov? ovra^ ; ov^ vfxcov, ecu rdXXa, aXXa ^eppovqcrov ttjv p.eyi(TTy)v e^eu ttoXlp KapStaz/ ; TavTa tolvvv ird(T)(ovTe<^ aTravre^ fxeXXo- ixeu Kai fxaXaKii^OjxeOa Kai irpos tov<; irXrjcriov /BXeTTOixev, aTTLcrTOWTe^ dXXrjXoL^, ov tco iravra^ is T^/xd? aZiKovvTi. KaiTOi rov diraaiv dcreXya><; ovto) )(jia)[jL€i'ov TL olecOe, iTreuSdv /ca^' eva r)fji(i)v eKdcr- Tov Kvpio'i yeuTjTai, tl TTOirjaeiv ; 36 Tt ovu aiTiov tovtojul ; ov ydp avev Xoyov /cat StKata? atrta? ovre toO' ovTO) rjpTiqTai. iirei Tpiiqpei? ye ao KoX aoiixdTOiv TrkrjOo? Kai '^rjfxdTcou Kai Trj? aWrj? 15 KaTaaKevrj? d(j)9oi'ia, Kai rdXXa 01? av ti? icr)(veiv Ta? TToXet? Kpivoi, vvv anacri Kai TrXeico Kai p.eit^oi ecTTi TO)v TOTe TToXXw. dXX' arravTa tovt a^prjaTa, dnpaKTa, dvovrjTa, vtto tcov ttcoXovvtcov yiyverai. "Oti 8' ovTOi TavT e^et, Ta fxev vvv opaTe orjirov 41 20 /cat ovSev i/xov npooSeio-Oe fxdpTvpo? • ra 8' e^ rot? dvcoOev ')(p6voi? oTi TovavTia ei^ev, iy oj SrjXcocrcL}, ov Xoyov? ifxavTov XeycDv, dXXd ypd^ifxaTa tcjv npoyo- v(x)v T(x)v vfJieTepcov, d ^Keivoi KaTeOevTo el? crTrjXiqv ^aXKrjV ypdxfjavTe? el? aKpoTToXiv. " ApOfxio?, 43 25 (firjcriv, " 6 TlvOa)vaKTO? ZeXeiTrj? aTifxo? Kai noXe- [Jiio? TOV Syjixov TOV ' A6r)vai(ov Kai to)v avixp^a^oiv, avTO? Kai yevo?" eW r) airta yeypaiTTai, 01 rjv TavT iyeveTO • " ort tov ^vcrov tov e/c Mijocov et? HeXoTTOvvrjo-ov r^yayevT TavT efrrt ra ypap-fxaTa, 40 I^ AHM0SOEN0Y2. 43 XoyC^eo'Oe Srj 7rpo<; Oewv, rt? rjv ttoO* tj Siavota Ttav *Adr)vaL(t)u t(ov tote raura ttolo-uvtcou, ^ ri to d^i-^ (Ojxa. eKelvoL ZeXeLTTju riva ApdixLov SovXop ySacrt- Xeiw? (jj yap ZeXeta ecrrt rrj? Aorta?), otl rw SecriroTr) SiaKoucou ^vcriov rjyayev €t5 Tlekorrovvq- 5 (Tov, ovK ^ K6rjvat,e, e^Opov ovtmv dueypaxjjau koL c&cor 44 Toiu (Tvixixd^oiv, avTov /cat yeuos, Koi dTiiLov;. tov- To 8' icrTiv ovx W ^^ '^^'^ ovto)(tI (jiijcreiev dTLfxiau • TL yap TO) ZekeiTT), rcop 'AOrjpaiMV kolv(ov et jxrj fxeOe^eiv efxeXKei/ ; aXX' iv rot? (f)ovLKOL<5 yeypairTai n voiJLOL^, vTTep 0}v dv fjLT] StSoj StKa? (fiouov StKctcra- crOai, " Kal art/Ao?," ^lycrt' " reBuaToi." tovto S17 Xeyet, KaOapov rov tovtojv rivd aTroKTeivavra eiuau. 45 ovKovv ivofiL^ov eKeivoi Tyj<; ndpTOJu roiv EWt^z/wz/ crcoTr)pia<; avrot? eTrt/xeXi^reov eti/at • ou yap ai^ au - 15 rot? efJLeXeu, et rt? e^' UeXoTTOi/vyjcrq) riva<; oiveirai Kal hia<^6eipeL, fxr] rovO vTToXajji/Sduova-Li' • eKoXa- t,ov 8' ovTOi /cat iTifxcopovi'To ou? aidOoivTO, (ocrre /cat crTr)XCTa<5 Troieiv. e/c 8e rourwv et/corw? ra rwi/ 'EXXt^vcoz/ 77V to) fBapf^dpoy (f)ol3epd, ovx 6 ^ap/3a- 28 46 /309 Tot5 'EXXi^crtz^. aXX* ov vvv • ov yap ovto)<; e)(e^' u/xet? oure Trpo? ra rotaura oure 77/309 rdXXa, dXXa TTW? ; etTTw ; KcXevere /cat ov/c opyietade ; 47 Ecrrt rotvvu rt? ev'rj07j<; X6yo<^ irapd tcjv irapa- fjLvOelcrOaL ^ovXofxeuc^v tyju ttoXli/, o)? apa oviro) 2E ^tXtTTTTO? icTTLv otot ttot' '^cTaf Aa/ce8atjawtot, ot ^a- XaTTT]^ fJL€i> rjpxov /cat y:^? aTrdcnq^, jSacnXea oe (xvp.- fiaxov ^\ov, v(f)C(TTaTO 8' ovSej^ avrovs • dXX o/xw5 i^ftwaro /cd/cetVovs 17 TToXts /cat ov/c dvqpTrdcTurj. KATA rj tov iroXefJcov. uvul o opdre fxep oiJttov tol TrXetcrra tov<; TT^oSora? 49 aTToXajXe/cora?, ovSeif S' e/c Trapard^eoi^ ov^k /xd^rj'^ yiyuoixepou • aKovere Se ^lXlttttop ov^t rw (f)dXayya u> ottXltojv dyew f^ahttflvO* oVot jSovXerai, dXXd tm i/ztXovs, tTTTrea?, ro^ora?, ^evov<;, tolovtov i^rjpTrj- crdaL (TTpaTOTTeSov. ineihav S' em rovrot? Trpo? 50 pocrovvTas iv aurots npocnrecrrj kol [jLr}Sel<; vnep rrj'; ^wpa? St' dTTLCTTiap e^tT/, ix-q^avrjfxar eTncTTiqcraq 20 TToXtop/cet. Acat (TLCOTTCJ 6epo avope^ ' AOrjvoiOL, TTOieLV eOeXcoixa^ d Set, tj <^vcri^ ttj^; e/cet- vov ^w/Da?, '^? dyeiv /cat <^ipeiv ecrrt ttoWiqv fcai KaKa)<; Troielv, ctXXa p^vpia • et? 8e dycot'a dfieivov rjixwi/ eKelvo, rtt'e? Se ot Tov ^eXtlo-tov /cat oVw? /jti7 SovXevcroucrtt' ot TToXtrat TrpdTTovT€<;. iroTepoi S17 ti^i' TrarptSa e^- RATA iAinnoT r. 43 (oXecrav ; 17 iroTepoi tov<; tTTTrea.? TrpovSocrau, cju TrpoooOiuTcov OkvuOo^ aTrcoXero ; ol to. ^tXiTnrov (fypouovure^ /cat or rjv r) ttoXis tov<; to, /^eXrtcrra Xeyoj^ras (TVKO(^avTovvTe'^ koX Sia^aXXot're? ovtoj?, T) ctjcrre tov y 'AnoXXcjvLSyjv kol e/cySaXeiz/ 6 S^/xos 6 Toii^ ^O\vvdio)v iireicrOrj. Ov Toivvv irapa tovtol<; p.6vov to €0o<; tovto 51 TToivTa KaKa elpydcraTO, dWodi 8' ovSafjiov • dXX' ei^ 'Eperpta, evretSr) aTraXXayeVro? nXovrctp^ou /cat 10 Twi/ ^eVaji^ 6 S-^/xo? et;)(e 717^' ttoXiz/ /cat toi' HopOfMou, ol jxeu i(j) vfid<; rjyov to. TTpdyjxara, 01 S' em tXt7r- TTOv. dKovoyTeti/;a9 'ImrouLKou o'vpip.a^o<; avrot? 58 t^tXtTTTTO? /cat ^eVovs ^tXtov9, TO. T6i)(r} nepLelXe tov UopOfMov /cat rpet? KaTeaTrjcre Tvpdvvov;, "linrap- ^ov, AvTOfieSovTa, KXetrap^ov • /cat jLtera ravr' i^eXrjXaKev e/c rr)? ^wpa? Stg 1787^ /3ovXojxevov^ 20 (Tco^ecrOaL. Kat Tt Set ra ttoXXo, Xiyeiv ; dXX' et* ^flpeai 4>tXt- 59 (TTiSrj<; jxkv enpaTTe ^lXittttcp koL MeVtTTTTO? /cat SoiKpdTTj^ Koi 0oa9 /cat 'AyaTrato?, olirep vvv e^oucrt Ti^i^ 77oXti^ (/cat Tavr' i^Secrai^ ctTraz^re?), 25 Ev(^pato9 8e rt9, dv9poiTTO'0 '^C^ o-a o Ol fxev iQixvvovTO, OL oe Trpovotooaav. tt]^ oe TToXew? ovTO)<; dXovcr7]<; atcr^oji? Kat KaK(i)Or)(Tap. rakka top avTOV rpoirov ot/xat Trai/f; , ii^a /xt; /oL, evretS^ rot? oXot? rjTTacrOaL ii/ofju^ou. o vrj top Ata /cat roi/ 'AttoXXoj r.f) eooLKa eyoj p.rj naorjTe v/u,et9, eireioav eiorjTe e/c- Xoyt^ojaej^ot fx'qoei' iv vfiLv evov. /catrot /at) yei'otro I'* /xeV, CO dpope<; \\6r)vaL0L, to. npdyfxaT ev tovtm • TeOvdvai oe ixvpLdKi<; KpecTTOv rj KokaKeia tl ttoltJ- crat fi>Lki7r7rov. Kok'rjv y ot TroXXot vvv d7reLkrj(f)a- Gf! O^tl^ ^flpeLTMU ^dpiV, OTL Tol<; OtXtTTTTOV ^tXot? ineTpexfjau aurov?, roi' S' FjV(f)paiov iotdovu • Kakrjv y 6 Srjfxo<; 6 'Kperpiecov, on tov<; fieu v^eTepov^ 7r/3e(T/5et9 aTnjkacre, KXetrap^o) S' eve^o)K€u avTOv • oouXeuovo't ye p-aaTiyovixevoi /cat affyarrofxevoL. Kakojq 'OkyuOiMP itpeicraTo twv tov fxeu AaaOeur) iTTTTap^ov ^etporovqadpTOiv, top Se 'AttoXXoj^'iS-i^z/ iKf3ak6vTcop. jxojpLa /cat /ca/cta ra rotavra ikml^eLv, 6/ /cat /caKw? /Sovkevofxepov; /cat fxyjoei' oiv npocryJKeL TToieiv idekoPTaq, " aXXa tw^' vvrep rw?/ i^dpoiv keyovTGiv aKpooifxevov^, TrjkLKavTrju rjyeLcrOaL nokiu OLKCLP TO jxey€0o<;, ajore p-yjoi' av otlo'vv f* heivov 20 46 IX. AHM02eEN0T2 68 TreCcrecrOaL. Kai ixrju /cdfce«/o ye ala")(pou, vcrrepou TTOT ehrelv, " tl<; yap av <}>yj0y) ravra yeveaOai ; vr) Tov Ata, eSet yap to /cat to TTOLrjo'aL, Kal to jxt) ttoi- Tjaat. TToAAa au enreiv e^otez^ (javvolol vvv, a TOT el jrpoeihovTo, ovk av ancoXovTO • ttoXX' av s 'npetrat, noXXa Ooi/cet?, iroWa Ta)v aTToXcoXoTcov 69 eKacTTOL. dXXa tl tovtosv 6(f)eXo9 fJLrjB' eKOiv (xrJT* M aKcov [Jir)SelIAinnOY T. 47 nepi TTjv HeXoTTOi/urjcTov eKeivai /cat Kanqyopiai, as iyui /cai noXvev/cro? 6 ^eXTicTTO'; eKeivocrt koI 'Hyq- (rtTTTTOs /cat ot aXXot Tr/aeV/Set? TrepLTJXOofxeu, koI inoLijcrafMev eTricr^eiv eKelvov /cat /otr^r' ctt' ^A/x^pa- Kiav iXdelu /jltJt' es HeXoTro^'z^cro^' opfxrja-aL. ov 73 fxivToi Xiyoi fxirjoeu avTov p.ev Srj ravra Xeyco, raOra ypdcfjo) • /cat ot- 76 o/i-at /cat fw ert eTrauopdcDOrjuaL av rd irpdypara rovTOiv yvyvop^evoiv • el he rt? e^ei, tovtcjp jSeXriou, 48 IX. AHM02eEN0T2 KATA •I'lAinnOY T. Xeyerco kol avfx/BovXeveTO). o tl S' vjjlli^ So^et, TOVTt ui irduTes deoi, avviveyKoi. NOTES ABBREVIATIONS. I. H. G. M. L. &S. , VI, , IX. Introduction. Hadley and Allen's Greek Grammar. Goodwin's Greek Grammar (Revised Edition). ■ Goodwin's Greek Moods and Tenses (1890). ■ Liddell and Scott's Greek-English Lexicon (Seventh Edition). Philippics A, B, r. NOTES. IV. ANALYSIS. Part I. — Preparatory Warnings and Encouragements, §§ 1-12. Part II. — Practical Recommendations, §§ 13-30. Part III. — Supplementary Arguments and Appeals, §§ 31-51. I. — a. Exordium: The orator apologizes for talcing precedence of older speakers, § 1. /*. The situation of Athens, though disgraceful, is not hopeless, § 2. c. The heroic achievements of the city in the past are au encouragement for the future ; while, on the other hand, Philip has shown himself an enemy too dangerous to be neglected, § 3. d. Philip was not daunted at the outset of liis career by his inferiority in strength to Athens. Athens, by imitating his example, will meet with a success like his, §§ 4-8. e. But the consequences of continued neglect will be fatal, §§ 9-12. II. — a. Prothesis : Statement of siibjects to be discussed, and request for a deliberate hearing, §§ 13-15. 6. Such preparations ought to be made that, when necessity arises, a sudden expedition may be made against Philip, §§ lG-18. c. Above all, a small, permanent force ought to be organized, — one- fourth to be Athenians, three-fourths mercenaries, §§ 19-22. d. Justification of the smallness of the force, and of its composition, §§ 23-27. e. Estimate of expenses, and statement of ways and means, §§ 28-30. III. —a. Geographical considerations which reinforce the demand for a per- manent force to hover near the Macedonian coast, §§ 31-32. b. The good results which will flow from the adoption of the measures recommended, §§ 33-34. c. The folly of waiting till the hour of need before making military preparations, §§ 35-41. d. Philip's restless activity is a sign of divine favor toward the Atheni- ans, § 42. e. Who are again conjured to participate personally in military affairs, §§ 43-46. /. Only so can justice be done to the generals, and the habit of idle gossip be put down, §§ 47-50. ff. Peroration : The orator has spoken plainly, in the hope of doing good, § 51. 61 52 NOTES. 1. — For the technical terms used in this section, see I. § 60. — Et . . . \€7€iv, 7/, me)i of Athens, some new matter were the subject of de- hate. ei.irpovTideTo implies ov irpoTideTai. The action of the presiding officer denoted by irpoTidivai is here thought of as continuing during the discussion. If it had been thought of as consisting merely in the annomicement of the subject, et irpoiiTiOr) would have been used. With the conception here adopted, cf. Isok. viii, 15 : irape\rikv6a diro(pavoijp,ei'os a rvyxO'Vw yiyvdicTKiov irepi tou ol trpVTdi'eLs irpoTidiavX.aTTO|A€vois = dv (pvXdTTTjade. — toiovtov . . . poviXoio-Ge, such as you would wish, in a satisfactory condition. The expression is ui the same construction as (po^epbv. — irapaSeiYftao-i : in pred. agreement with TTi pw/xT) and tt; v^pei. H. 777 a. The relations of Athens with Sparta and with Philip illustrate or exemplify the statements just made as universally true. — ck . . . voi3v, in consequence of giving heed to affairs. — tovtov : Philip. — €k . . . exP'H'' = ^'^ "'""^ fi-qSev (ppovTl^etv To'uTwv wv (ppovTi'geiv ixpv^- fJiV^^" is cogn. ace. 4. — TO . . . ditoXwXe'vai, thpfict. thiif. nil thp. fnrtifip.d tmmvi (i.e., those about to be named) h ave bee n lost. — jjievToi : a more emphatic adversa- tive than 5^. — IlvSvav . . . tovtov. I. 0, 16, 17, 18. — oIkciov kvkXw. The natui-al order would be KVKXip oiKeiov, but this would give a hiatus. I. 61. oUeiov = as our own , kv kXw =j r»ind. (ihntit.^ i.e., aromid the Thermaic Gulf. — iroXXd . . . 'Ktivo): applicable to the Pa;onians, Illyrians, and Thessalians. I. 13, 18, 21. — (a€t' €K€ivov, on his side, ranged loith him. So below, § 8. 5. — ti TavTT]v €ip€iv, consult Diet. Antiq., EISPHORA, and I. 56. On the mili- tary age at Athens, see I. 54. — o-weXovTi dirXcos, briefly and simply, in one word (lit. for one comprehending the matter in a simple state- ment). With ffvvekbvTL, elTreTv is generally iised. H. 771 b ; G. 1172, 2. — vjiwv avTuv -yevco-Gai, to rely upon yourselves. vp.Cov is pred. gen. of possession. H. 732 a ; G. 1094, 1. The same idea is expanded in what follows, Trai(Ty)ffOe . . . irpd^eiv. — ovSev. An infinitive dependent upon iXirigu) is commonly negatived by /xt?, but sometimes by ov. In this sentence the mood of wavcnqade might at first be thovight to require the use of iJ.-r]Uv (H. 1027 ; G. 1610), but ovbkv is admissible, because the hope here referred to is one actually existing. — Kal Td v|AeT«p' avTwv begins the apodosis. On aiirubv, see II. 092, 2 ; G. 1003. — The argument of §§ 4-7, though stirring and hence satisfactory for the purposes of oratory, is not logically cogent ; for the success of an energetic Philip over an inactive Athens affords no ground for expect- ing the success of an energetic Athens over an energetic Philip. Only on the supposition of Philip's sinking into apathy at the same time that Athens aroused herself, would the two compared cases be at all correspondent. NOTES. 55 8. — iTtini^ivai dOdvara, are fixed for ever. The pred. adj. dOdvara is proleptic, i.e., expresses the result of the verb. — tis, many a one. The remark, /xurei . . . vyT)v. The idea is that, if Athens takes vigorous measures against Philip, the various forms of dissatisfaction in his empire, which do not now dare to show their heads, will rally about her. 9. — TO irpdYfjia, the state of the case, explained by what follows. — aa-tXydas : gen. partitive. H. 757 ; G. 1088. — a(j-i throws the responsibility for the statement upon common report. — Kal ovx, . • . irepio-Toixt^trai, and is not the man to rest in possession of ivhat he has conquered (lit. holding the thi'ngs which he has conquered to rest upon these), but is ever compassing something more and drawing his nets about us on all sides, while we delay and sit at ease, /xiveiv depends upon olos. H. 1000 ; G. 1520. wpocr- in TvpoairepifidWeraL signifies in addition; for the rest of the word see L. & S. irepLlBdWw. In -rrepi- aroixi'^eTa.i we have a metaphor from hunting. See L. & S. arolxos II. 10. — €ir€iSdv Ti yivr]Tai. H. 1012. — £ir€i8dv ...■§: a fictitious answer, professing to state what is in the minds of the audience, vi] Ala and the corresponding negative fid Aia were common colloquial- isms, amounting to hardly more than intensive particles, vij Ala may here, as often, be translated forsooth, the sentence being spoken in a tone implying dissent or contempt on the part of the orator. ■ — tC. H. 726 ; G. 1077. ■ — t-yw \i.kv ^dp, For I, for my part, yap introduces the reason for the implied answer {xpv rd yiyvd/xeva dvdyK-qv ijyeTadai) to the preceding question. fj.iv is used here, as often, without a cor- relative 5^, serving to give special prominence to iyw as against pos- sible dissentients. Cf. VI, 16. — dwi : used interjectionally, like dye and (p^pe, without regard to the number of persons addressed. — ir€pii6vT«s, sauntering about, lounging about. Cf. § 48 ; VI, 14. — avTwv = dWiqXuv. H. 686 a and b ; G. 995, 996. — Xc-ycraC ti kuivov ; Cf. Acts of the Apostles, xvii, 21. — -YevoiTO ^dp dv, why, could there be f yap is often thus used in animated (luestious, and this use is probably not to be derived from its value as a causal conjunction, 56 NOTES. but to be regarded as one of the relics of its original value as an intensive particle. 11. — T€6vTjK€ . . . aa-dtvtl. The orator repeats dramatically a ques- tion and answer, supposed to be exchanged by two Athenians. For the allusion, see I. 23. — ov ti irdOTj. L. & S. wda-x^ II, 3, b. So below, § 12. — ovTw : i.e., as you have been doing. — ovSe "ydp ovtos, for not even this man, i.e., the existing Philip, in opposition to the future Philip, whom Athenian negligence might be expected to raise up. — irapd, on account of. Cf. IX, 2. 12. — KaCroi Kttl TovTO, But still further. H. 612. — tA rfjs tvxtis : hardly different in meaning from i] t^xv- D- is fond of such peri- phrases. Cf. § 32, TO tQv Trvev/jLaTiav ; § 45, to ttjs t^xi]^ SXid rb tQv dedv ; IX, 45, rh tQv 'EWrivuv. H. 621 b ; G. 953, end. — ri iKp . . . CTri^eXoviJLeGa = t) irep ael ^iXriov tj/jluv eTri^ieXetVat tj rjfj.€?s rifiwv aiiT&v. In our sentence the verb is omitted in the first and expressed in the second member of the comparison, a construction contrary to the constant English, and the prevailing Greek custom. Cf. § 34, oix ua-rrep k.t.\. — Kai roiir' : i.e., his death, implied in et n. iridoi. — Ho-O' : probably imperative, while in IX, 30, KaKetvo ye la-re, the form is indicative. — ovres = «' etijre. — i-iricrTavTes, l^utting yourselves at the head of. — SiSovtwv twv Kaipwv = el oi Kaipol 8i5o?ev. On didduruv, see H. 825 ; G. 1255. — 'Ap,<|)i"iroXiv. I. 14, 15. — a.-jn]pri\\i€vo{,, far removed, the opposite of irXiqa-lov ovres. awr\pTrifx.4voi . . . yvdip.ais explains cJs vvv exere. 13. — 'fls . . . eroi(i(os. Construe: cJs fiev otv Set (y/xas) airavras virapxeiv edeXovras Trotetf eToip-ws to, irpoa-qKovra, and make the clause dependent upon \eyuv. virdpxei-v id^Xovras, a favorite form of expres- sion with D., is hardly different in meaning from edeXeiv. M. 830, end. — cos . . • •7r€'7r€iao-iv. The Attic orators generally refer to oral tradition rather than to books as the source of historical informa- tion. Cf. §§ 23, 24 ; IX, 48. 18. — Surely it (i.e., the preparation T recommend) is not altogether to be despised, even if you vjould not do that (i.e., make sudden expe- ditions), as I say you ought; (on the contrary, it is worth while), in 58 NOTES. order that he either may know you to he in readiness . . . and keep quiet through fear, or, disregarding these preparations, may he caught off his guard, etc. For av with iroiriaa.i.T , see L. & S. S.v B, III, d ; G. 1421, 3. et'Stis ei)Tpe7rers y/ctas = et'Scis u/xas &VTa.s eiTpeveii. Cf. § 41, eaj' iv Xeppo- v-rjaij} Trvd7]pa.v must be distinguished from the sort of expedition referred to at the end of tlie preceding section. D. means to say that even if tlie Athenians do not make sudden expeditions to meet Philip and check his advances, they may descend upon his territory when he is absent or unprepared. — evSS : sc. 6 ^iXi-mros. 19. — To the comparatively commonplace and unimportant recom- mendations of §§ 16-18, D. does not recur in thecourse of the oration, just as in the introductory passage, §§ 13-15, he does not appear to have had them in view. His main effort is to secure the adoption of the measures set fortli in §§ 19-22. The novel features of his plan (cf. § 14, cLv 5o/cw TLvi Kai.vT)v TrapacTKevrjp Xeyetv) are these : (1) the force to be raised is to be a permanent one ; (2) it is to be composed, to the extent of one fourth part, of Athenians ; (3) after serving for a fixed term, the Athenian members of the force are to be relieved by fellow- citizens. On the whole subject, see I. 52, 54. — ScSox^ai — irapeo-Kcvd- trGai. While the aorist infinitives would denote the performance of the actions, the perfects denote the condition of their having been performed. But, in this connection, there is no more difference of sense than in English between These preparations ought to be adopted and These preparations ought to exist. Cf . M. 109, 1 10. — i*'^ |ioi : sc. Xe'fere or Xeyiru tis. H. 612. — €inCTToXi|Aaiovs 8vvq|1€IS, paper- forces; i.e., forces promised in letters (eina-ToXai) to generals abroad, but not actually sent. Cf. §§ 30, 45. For the meaning and position of Taijras, see § 17, rai^ras, note. — dXX' : SC. dwa/xip riva. — rijs iroXews, under the control of the city. — kov — kciv. These particles, literally meaning hoth if — and if, regularly correspond to our ivhether — or. In this instance we must either take the koI of the first Kb.v as mean- ing and, and suppose that hv — kKv are used in the sense of kAv — Khv, a use for which no i:)arallel has been found ; or we must, with several editors, insert koI into the text after ea-rai. — t6v Seiva, So-and-so. 6 SeTva often refers to a particular person, whom one cannot or will not call by name ; here, and regularly in D. , it is used like the NOTES. 59 English Mr. A. or Mr. B., where a particular name would be appro- priate, but none is definitely indicated. It thus differs from ns and 6(j-Ti, which are wholly indefinite in meaning. — ovrtvovv. L. & S. 6Tiv = (TiT-rjpiffiov. See I. 55. 20.^ — co-Ttti . . . €^€1 : the same threefold division as in §§ 13, 15. — ravra •iroieiv : i.e., ireldecrOaL Kai aKoXovdetv. — Ka6* '€Kas in'govs. The noun following wcnrep is here, as often, attracted from the nominative to the case of the noun in the former member of the comparison. — i-irira-ywYovs. I. 53. Transports (, lohen I have shown lohy, etc. — TT]XiKai)TT)v, of such a size, i.e., so small. — iroXCTas . . . keXcvu. The natural translation would be, I urge that those who make the expedition he citizens. But D. has not proposed that all, but only that a fourth part of the force be Athenians. It is necessary, therefore, to take elvat as the substantive verb, having as its subject TToXiras Tom ffTparevopiivovs, which hardly differs from tovs arparevofie- vovs TToXiras, and to translate, I demand the existence of the (just-men- tioned) citizens doing military service. 23. — TO(ravTT]v (= rrikiKaur-qv) : sc. airoxpliv olfiai. — €vi, it is possi- ble. Cf. § 8, evi, note. — iropio-aaSai. Compare with iropla-avTas, §25, and account for the difference of voice. — tt^v . . . irapaTaloiJie'viiv = TjTis fKeivii) TrapaTa^eTai, Jit to meet him inthe open field. Tlie fut. jiart. with the article is often thus used to describe a person or thing as 60 NOTES. intended, fit, or likely to do something. Cf. M. 82G. — tovtu . . . XPTJo-Oai : amplification of XriffT€vei.v. ■ — riiv irpsoTTjv, at first. H. G22 ; G. lOGO. The implication is that by and by it will be possible to cope witli Pliilip in regular warfare. — (jtitrOos — Tpo(|)TJ. I. 55. — dKovico. Cf. § 17, (paiTiv, note ; § 24, oida clkovwv. For tlie tense of clkoiju), see H. 827 ; M. 28. — Tp€<)>€iv — crvvXdpxovs — iirirdpxous. See I. 52, and NOTES. 61 Diet. Antiq. — ras iropnTas. Processions formed i\wr- iros, that by the help of the winds and the seasons of the year Philip gets the start of you, and so accomplishes most of his designs ; lit. accom- plishes most things by getting a prior hold upon them, rd iroWd being object of both irpoXa/x^dvuv and SiaTrpaTTeTai. The meaning of this clause is made more explicit by what follows, (pvXd^as . . . dcpiKiffdai. — ({>v\d^as . . . x^'K''^'"''* waiting for the etesian ivinds or the winter. The strong northerly winds which blow in the iEgean Sea during dog- days were called iTrjfflai. They would greatly hinder an Athenian fleet making for Macedon. Again, the Greeks were accustomed to suspend navigation in the stormy season of winter. — t|vik dv jat] SwaifxeOa, when we could not. This is a hypothetical or indefinite relative sentence; hence the use of p.7]. H. 1021 ; G. 1428. 1. The use of the opt. with dv is analogous to that in § 18, el ni) Troi-jjeratr ' dv TovTo. See also M. 557. 32. — Por^OcCais, extemporized forces, opposed to wapaffKevy ffwexei Kal dvpdfiei. — ■ucrT6pioi3[x£v dirdvTwv : as in the instances cited § 35. — uTrdpx«i • • • 8wvd(j.«i, and it is possible for you to use as winter-quarters for the force. For xetM^Stoj, see § .3, irapaSelyixaffL, note. — Arjjivu) . . . v/jo-ois* I. 3, 30. — d XPT a. Tliis shows that tliis speech was accompanied by a motion embodying its recommendations. For the technical use of 7pd0w, see I. 60. — av . . . Xiyo) = S.I' irpCiTov TropiarjTe, w dvdpes A0r]vaiOL, ravra to, xPVf^o,''''^ a X^7w. The asyndeton is due to the fact that this sentence is a mere summing up of recommendations previously made and referred to m what immediately precedes. — svTcXfj . . . 8vva(iiv, in a word, the whole force complete. bvvap.Lv is in the same construction as the pre- ceding accusatives, and evreXij is used proleptically in agreement with it. Cf. § 8, dddvara, note. The object of KaraKXeiariTe is to be sup- plied from 5vvap.(.v. Some editors, omitting the comma after 8ivap.Lv, construe ivTeXij as in agreement with rdWa, and dvvapLv as object of KaraKXeiarjTe. — Ta|j.Cai Kttl iropicrTal. Of the poristae very little is known ; they were presumably appointed on special occasions to devise ways of raising funds. The tamise were treasurers, who superintended the outlay of the public moneys. See Diet. Antiq. D. demands that the Athenians themselves attend to the provision and expenditure of funds, instead of throwing these responsibilities ujion their generals (cf. I. 8), and that the generals be held account- able only for their conduct of military affairs. — t6v Xo-yov, the account, which generals, like other Athenian oflBcials, were obliged to render at the conclusion of their term of service. See Diet. Antiq., EUTHYNE. 34. — diro . . . o-v|A|jidxwv : i.e., it is by preying upon the commerce of your own allies that he obtains the means of carrying on war against you (see I. 21). vperdpuiv and v/uv are brought together for emphasis. — d-ywv Kal (f>Ep(i)v, agens et ferens, plundering. — avrol, yourselves, in contrast with your allies. — ovx ua-rrtp k.t.X. The expression is here condensed by omitting the principal verbs, instead of omitting, as is done in English in such cases, the subordinate verbs. The meaning is : ovk olx'^o'iTai ex'^" <^£vaKi5€iv. The subject is indefi- nite. H. 942. 39. — ovK modifies 5« ; aKoXovdeTv would require /xri. The order of words corresponds to that in such English sentences as, I ask, not this, but that. — ovt« repeats rbv avrbv rpbirov. — rois PovX€vo|i€vous, those who deliberate; i.e., in the case of Athens, the citizens in the Ekklesia. The words are subject of i]ye?\ia-Kdv(,} may be used with an accusative either of the penalty or the charge ; here alffx^vriv is penalty, dvavbpiav is charge. To uKpXrjKorei dv Tlfxev supply mentally as condition, if we acquiesced. The position of drj/xoa-iq. is emphatic. — vvv 8', But as it is. Often so, especially after a condition contrary to reality. — tov irXeiovos, that which is more, or simply, more. 43. — eavHidto) — d,I wonder that. H. 926 ; G. 1423. — IvevfielTai, is concerned. — irepl — virep, in reference to — for the sake of. wepl here comes near to the proper meaning of virdp ; cf. the opposite change of 68 NOTES. meaning in § 1. — ov OeQu. Others take t6 evuevis as subj., and translate, the favor of the yods and that of fortune. — \l/T|(|>t,(rp.a K6v6v, an empty (i.e., unexecuted) vote. Cf. §§ 19, 20, 30. — dW . . . diroo-ToXovs, hut your enemies deride, and your allies are in mortal fear of, such expeditions. aTrouTSXovs, belonging in sense equally with KaTayeXuaiv and Tedvdai t(^ deei, takes the case required by the latter expression. For the construction, see H. 713 ; L. & S. OvrjiTKUi I. 2, end. In explanation of the fear of the allies, see I. 8. 46. — €va avSpa : i.e., the general. D. may have in mind Chares, who was proverbial for making promises (yiroax^'^^"-') which he could not perform. — diroiAio-Gwv, unpaid. The word has also the meaning paid off. — 01 . . . coo^iv = ot 5^ pq-diiiis xj/evdSixevoi irphs v/jlcLs virkp wv cLv eKeivos Trpd^r) evOdd' wclv. The idea is that the generals are recklessly {pq.dLws) impeached by men who remain in Athens (evOdde), and who have consequently no projier knowledge of the generals' deserts. virkp here = yrepl. Cf. § 1. — o ti dv rix'^n (sc. xp-qcpi^bixevoi.) , whatever you may happen to, at hap-hazurd. — tC . . . irpoaSoKdv, what must roe expect ? /cat gives emphasis to the question. 47. — oTttv, when, does not correspond strictly with irus, how, of the preceding question. — o-TpaTiwTas — [idpTvpas — 8iKao-Tds : pred. accus. — €v0vv(ov. Cf. § 33, Tbv \6yov, note. diKaaTas twv evdvvQv are dikasts in suits in which an official's accounts are impeached. — vjAds : grammatically superfluous, but rhetorically emphatic. — to w|a£t€p* ovTwv. Cf. § 7, note. — alo-xvvrjs. Cf. § 9, dffeXyeias, note; § 37, vjipfws. — Sis Kal Tpls : idiomatic for two or three times. — KpivtTai irtpl NOTES. 69 OavttTow — d-ywvCo-oo-Oai irepl Gavdrov, is tried for his life — to contend at the risk of his life. Sue 1. 8. — t6v . . . 0dvaTov. Kidnapping, whetlier of free persons or slaves, and the stealing of clothes, esijecially from the batlis, were common crimes at Athens, and were punished, like pockel-picking, burglary, temple-robbery, etc., with death. — Tov irpocrTJKOVTOs : SC. Oavdrov. 48. — 01 |jL£v . . . 8iaav€p£i.v. I. 60. — TTiv . . . dire'xOtiav, unj)opularity with you. In the proper connection the same words might mean, hatred towards you. — ola . . . 8u|epx6(Ae0a, hut we rehearse what he is doing, what dangerous and intolerable things. The position of 5^ makes woiei em- phatic. It often has for this purpose the third or fourth place in a clause. raOra is an emphatic repetition of ola . . . xaXeTrd. — i'lreiO . Cf. IV, 3, e-rreira, note. — cos fJ.«v . . . irapeo-Ketiao-Oe (lit. hoio you might speak . . . you are better provided), you are better equipped than Philip for speaking, etc. Similarly the following clause : but to prevent . . . you are wholly inefficient. Cf. M. 329. 2. 4. — o-v|iPaivei. . , . X6*yoi, There results, therefore, a state of things, necessary, I think, and, I may say (taws), deserved: you are each better off in those things on which you each spend time and pains, he in actions, but you in ivords. After ravra, which is nom., as appears from ai wpd^eis and oi \6yoi, supply ffvu^alvei from the beginning of the sen- tence. Or, perhaps better, the words irpayna . . . eUbs may be taken as parenthetical, irpayp.a being in apposition with the sentence, v : dependent upon the prep, in irpoai- periov. — The foregoing prooeniiuni is hardly appropriate to the oration which follows ; for whereas the procsmium insists upon the necessity for active measures instead of words, no active measures are recom- mended in the oration. 6. — npioTov jA€v. The division of topics here begun is lost sight of, and the expected iirena nowhere follows. — Oapp€i, feels no alarm. — dKovo-ai 8id ppaxv, to hear briefly ; a condensed expression for, to hear vie state briefly. — 8i' ovs — 8i' <5v. With the ace. 8id, denotes cause, with the gen., instrument. In this passage the distinction is inappreciable. — rdvavxCa . . . irpoo-SoKdv, I have been led (lit. it has occurred to me) to expect the contrary. — irpoo-O'^o-eo-Oe : a case of ana- coluthon. In place of a subj. dependent upon 'iva, an independent fut. indie, is substituted. 7. — Xo-yC^oK't"'''; reason or argue as follows. — n\)X.uv k.t.X. I. 35, 30. — Ti Zr\ "iroTt. Cf. IV, 35, note. — irpos TrXeove^tav . . . t^erd^wv, estimating his calculations by reference to self-aggrandizement and the bringing everything under his own control ; or, as it is meant that he adopted or rejected plans according as they did or did not conform to his standard, wo may freely translate, choosing his course by reference to, etc. 8. — ov8€v . . . Troi-qa-tiiv, could not promise nor perforin anything of such importance. — vt^' ov, that by it. M. 575 end ; G. 1445 ; H. 910. — Tivds. In the Ionic dialect the indef. pronoun often stands between the genitive of the article and its noun (e.g., tQv tls 'EWrjvuv) ; in Attic this position is allowed only when an attributive word follows the article, as here, dWwv. — irpocto-Oc : aor. opt. The force of the preceding cli> continues in the rel. clause. — \670v iroiovfiEvoi, having regard. — rriv . . . irpd^iAaTi. These words might also be arranged T7]i> Till irpdy/xaTi TTpocrovaav dSo^iav, or Tr]P Trpoaovaav rip wpdyfiaTL d8o^iav, or tt]v rip -rrpdyp-aTi ddo^lav irpoaovaav (H. 067 a), but of these arrangements the first would occasion the concurrence of three short syllables {-/uLart. irpoa-), while the second and third would occasion a hiatus (-fxari ddo-). See I. 61. — ofjioCcos — wo-ircp av el, just as if. There is an ellipsis of evavTiuideL-qTe after dia-wep hv. H. 905, 3 ; G. 1313. — Ti ToiovTov, any such thing as the subjugation of any Hellenic community, implied in line 7. 9. — oirtp orvvi^r\ (lit. which happened), as proved to be the case. — dvrl . . . yiyvo]i(v(i)v, in return for their own gains. — ovx oirois, not only not. oiix Srt (or Swtos), fxr) 6ti (or Situs), elliptical for 01) Xiyu 6ti, NOTES. 73 fiT] \ey4TU} Tts Sri, set aside a statement either as imimportaut (= not to speak of the fact that) or untrue (= far from saying that). In the former case they are to be translated not only, in the latter, not only not. — Meo-cTTivious — 'Apydov^. I. 38. — ravra iiT€iXri(J)us, because he entertained the same opinions of them as of the Thebans. — Ka9* i(iMv €-yKco|iiov, eulogy upon you. This use of Kord with the genitive in a sense the reverse of hostile is not common. 10. — Ke'Kpi(r9€ — dv — -irpoeVOai, you have been judged that you would betray; or, idiomatically, the judgment has been expressed that you, etc. — KcpSovs : gen. of value. Similarly xap'Tos and oJ^eXet'as, below. — TO, Koivd . . . 'EWrjvwv : i.e., the riglit to freedom. — ws ertpus (lit. hoio otherwise!), quite otherwise. Similarly iiro\iv — IIoTiSaiav. I. 15, 17. — irpoeiTO : aor. indie. The conclusion is a^ ijyelro. Notice the difference of tense. H. 895 ; G. 1397. 18. — dfjL0d(rri irotTJcras. L. & S. (pedvu III, 1, end ; II. 984 ; G. 1580. The addition of irpdrepos JQ NOTES. is pleonastic. Cf. IV, 14, ht) wpbrepov TrpoXafi^dvere. — (^ieLv — ava-TpaTerjeo-dai, and note. — €l . . . XtV- H- 804, 2 ; G. 139.3. 2. — ' AvBejAoxivTa — IIoTiSaiav. I. 17. • — TT)v e\Opa,v Ttiv irpos 'HH-^Sj our hostility. Cf. § 3, tt]p irpos vp.d.% dir^X^^'-"-" — avfipTiTo — tSeStoKti. These pluperfects, denoting com- pleted actions, refer to the time immediately succeeding that to which the preceding imperfect refers. And so was himself the bearer, etc. — Toiavra : i.e., such things as they now are siiffering. — X«yovtos . . . -irio-Ttvo-ai. This is the dependent form of the sentence, \eyovT6s TLvos (gen. abs. expressing condition) eirla-Teva-av av. For the position of hv, which belongs to the verb, see H. 802 ; G. 1311. 21. — TT|V dWoTpCav : sc. x^P"-"- H. 621 c ; G. 953. — iroXvv : sc. Xpbvov. D. hopes to see Philip's power broken and Olynthus restored. Hence he says, /or a long time, and not, for ever. — cKireo-ovTcs, ex- pelled. I. 29. — ov yap . . . 6)j,i\iai, for these too close connections with tyrants are not safe for republics. For \iav and avrai, cf. IV, 17, i^al(pvris and raijTas, with note. 22.- — Ti 8' 01 0€TTaXoi, And how about the Thessalians? H. 612. — TOiis Tvpdvvovs e^e'PaXXe. I. 20. — irdXiv : for 7rd\ii> ot€. — N^Kaiav — Ma-yvT)(riav. I. 36. — 8£Ka8apxiav. See I. 37. Another interpre- tation is that Philip established in each city of Thessaly a dekadarchy, like those created earlier by Sparta (I. 1), but this does not seem con- sistent with the U8e of the singular in our pa.ssage. — IlvXaiav. I. 36. — TovTov . . . irapaip'/io-eo-Oai. I. 37. — ovk terri ravra, this is impos- sible; i.e., they certainly did not expect these results. NOTES. 77 23. — o(ra TOiavra = Saa icrrl roiaOra. 24. — SairdvTis irpoo-Stirai, require expense besides. — tois irX'/jOecri, to peoples, popular (juvcrnments. — ovSev . . . iraOrjre. Cf. IV, 44, ovdiiroT . . . deSvTwv, note. 25. — ilr . . . iyjovTo. ; I)o you then not see that Philip has even his titles thoroughly incompatible with this? or, idiomatically, that Philip'' s very titles are thoroughly, etc. — iro\£(iov. The war between Messene and Sparta is meant. 26. — eopvPovvT€s . . . \€7€Tai, clamoring that they were rightly spoken, declaring with applause their approval. — irpEo-pecov : D.'s colleagues on the embassy. Why D. separated from them (as is im- plied in ir&Ktv ixyrepov) is not known ; perhaps to visit other Pelopon- nesian states. — irapovros Ijioi) : gen. absol. — is eoiKtv : to be joined with what follows. The adhesion of the Mcssenians to Philip appeared from the embassy just arrived. I. 39. — ov8ev jidWov (lit. no more), nevertheless not. — aroirov, €t. Cf. IV, 4.3, Oav/id^w — el, with note. — irap' a . . . 6pwo-i, contrary to what they perceive by their reason to be best. For the omission of ovra after opQa-i, cf. IV, 18, eiSws evrpeireis vfias, witli note. — dXX' dfieis. Instead of continuing. But this is strange, that you seeing the better, should follow the loorse, the orator substitutes an express and gloomy prophecy. Cf. § 0, Tpoadrjo-ea-de. 27. — irepiTetxi^eo-Oe. — ^ The commoner reading is Trepiaroixl^eade, which is more appropriate. The word repeats in the form of a meta- phor the meaning of eTn^ovXeveade, you are plotted against. I. 62. — «3 at first ; i.e., at the beginning of the peace negotiations. The phrase limits Trpoa-Kpoija-aaiv. — ws aWms, to no purpose. Cf. § 10, cJs er^pws, note. — rd vwi (= vvvl) : contrasted with wore. 33. — Kal o-ux^ • . - <|>oPo{i|xai Se, and though I (lit. should not wish to judge rightly) hope I may be mistaken, yet I fear. — tovt refers to the calamity prophesied at the end of § 32. — dfieXeiv €|ov(r(a. H. 952 ; G. 1521. —Tov Seivos. Cf. IV, 19, rbv Mm, note. 34. — €' ols, the objects for ivhich. — SeScopoSokt^koo-i. H. 982 a ; G. 1590 ; also I. 31. — twv . . . diroXwXoTwv (geu. part, depending on NOTES. 79 Tt) : of the losses occasioned by them, — «s to, iroXXd, for the most part, generally. — cvCovs. D. means the Athenians. — xois iiro X"P*» those who come first to hand. 35. — (jieWci . . . -irpaYiiaTa, events belong to the future and are tak- ing shape. — tCs • . • irpocVOai — rts ianv 6 nelcras Kal iroiTja-as v/xds wpoiadai ^(jjKias Kal UOXas. TEschines is meant. I. 35. — iirl — «ls. The preposition is changed for variety merely. So below, wepl — vir^p. — Twv SiKaCcov, your rights, as determined by the Peace. — os . . . T]|i€pq., which will afflict each man when it comes, but which began on that day. y^yove has the strict use of the perfect (= has begun), and thus differs from an aorist, which would be used of an event that came into being and passed away ; but being coui^led, according to a Greek idiom, witli an adverbial expression referring to the time of beginning, it is best rendered by the English simple preterite. Cf. Dem. xxxviii, 8, iravTa ravra dcpetrai rdre ; Plato, Krito, 44, A, e/c TLvos imwviov o idipaKa dXiyov Trpdrepov ; also the commoner combination of the present with the adverb wdXai.. D. means to say that a war for the possession of Attic territory is already virtually begun ; it dates from the day when iEschines persuaded the people to abandon Phokis and Thermopyl?e. 36. — ■n-pd-yixa, trouble. — vavcrl KpaTTJcras, having conquered at sea. Philip's navy was still small, compared with that of Athens. Cf. IV, 22, note. — 4»a)K€'as = ttjv $w/c/5a. — 6|xo((i> . . . ov, a war like that on account of ivhich. The Greek uses relatives {olos, oairep, 6s) after iaos, ofx-otos, wapap-otos, Trapair\rii'yixiva.. — tv ols . . . <|>vXdTTovTes, engaged in maintaining the conditions under which they themselves enjoy distinction and power. — tovs . . . ovras, those who are at the head of affairs ; the same class as that referred to by nvki above. — ■ ovSev co-rai, dim at nothing else than that the city may inflict punishment on itself (i.e.., on its own citizens, tCjv iwl roh trpdyfiaa-iv 6vTwv) and he engaged in this task. 3. — iroXireiai, jwlltkal methods. — tirl (xev twv aXXoiv, in other cases, everywhere else ; contrasted with f/c 5f tov (rvfi^ovXeveLv below. — |cvois =: ixerolKOLs. — -iroXXovs k.t.X. The comparatively unoppressive treat- ment of slaves in Athens is attested also by Xen. On the Athenian State, 1, 12. — £viais. D- refers to oligarchical cities. — Ik . . . i^f.\r\- XttKare, but from the speeches of the assembly you have banished it (i.e,, T7]v irappricriap) altogether. 4. — dQ', therefore. — Tpv£po|j.ai, But to your pretending to be at peace, as he does, if 1J0U prefer, I do not object; i.e., I do not insist upon a formal renun- ciation of the peace, provided you will go as far as Philip in virtual violation of it. 9. — -TavTTiv ctpTJvqv. II. 632 a. "What shows that elp-qvi)v is pred. ace. ? — irpwTOv |A€v — £ir€iTa. See IV, 3, note. — CKtCvw . . . Xt'-yei. The phrases iKeivqj irap' vpiCJu and vfi?y nap' iKeivou are pred. modifiers of TTjv eipT)vriv, with which understand oSo-a;'. The sentence therefore 82 NOTES. = i) eipijvi) 7)v Xiyei eKdixp Trap ii/xuv eariv, ovx vfMV trap' CKeivov, the peace which he speaks of is observed on (lit. from) your side toward him, not on his side toward you. Cf. H. 670 a and (518 ; G. 971, 972. — XP'I" jjidTCtfv : gen. of price. The reference is to money spent in bribes. — avTos . . . iroXtfjiciorOai : explanatory of toCto, 10. — lAe'xpt TovTov : explained by gws . . . -rroXeneiv. — ols. See VI, 17, ols, note. 11. — TovTo [tiv — ToiJTo 8*. H. 654 b ; G. 1010. — 'OXwOiois k.t.X. I. 29. — Svoiv Gdrepov, one of two things ; best omitted in translation. Cf. VI, 18, d/xcpdrepa, note. — airov : sc. fxrj oiKeTu. ■ — irdvTa . . . diro- Xo-yTi(ro(i€vovs, though ahoays before, if any one brought any such accu- sation against him, he was indignant and sent ambassadors to make a counter-statement. For the condition, ei airidcraiTo, see VI, 20, el . . . }\.iyoi, note. As there the present infinitive, so here the present parti- ciples denote customary action in past time. H. 856 a ; G. 1289. With verbs of sending, i^urpose is generally expressed by the fut. partic. without the article. But cf. § 71, and M. 826. — els 4>toK€as K.T.X. I. 34, 35. — T]pi5ov ol iroXXol, the majority (deceived by vEschi- nes and such men) contended. — ttjv tKtivov irdpoSov, his entrance, i.e., into Central Greece by the pass of ThermopylcB ; cf. VI, 30, eav irap^Xdr], note. 12. — #€pds K.T.X. I. 37. — €x«t KaraXaPuv, seized and holds. G. 1262. — 'ilpciTais may depend upon either e' eavrov TptirtcrOai, to turn (intransitive) against himself. — twv . . . }j.Kr0o€\oiTo, should silence (lit. take away). 15. — 'AW* . . . av ; But oh, in Heaven'' s name, is there any one who, in his senses, would from names rather than from facts judge of the one at pence or at ivar with him 1 i.e., judge whether one was at peace or at war with him ? — €| dpX'HS' See IV, 14, note. — owiro) Aioireieows . . . dTr€€p€ hi\, well then. — vvv, an emphatic now, modifies Troie?. — Pao-iXcvs, the king of Persia ; cf. §§ 43, 47 ; VI, 11, note. — €-yvwKa' t]s TjiAcpas = dTro t^s rififpas ■§. H. 994 a, 995 a ; G. 1038. — dveiXe ^wKtas. I. 36. — opi^oiiai, I affirm. The word literally means to bound or determine, and hence is suitable for fixing the date of beginning of an action. — tov6' — iroifjo-ai : i.e., cLfwviadai. — Kal — -ye, Yes, and. Cf. VI, 29, koI iraKivy' . — twv dXXwv Twv wa-6ai, to be a vain babbler. — irpoo-e'xTjTe, may give heed, L. & S. irpoaix^ 4, a. NOTES. 85 21. — |X€-yas: proleptic. Cf. IV, 8, dOdvara, note. — €K . . . dpxds, froin being innUjniJicaiU and contemptible (it the outset. The phrase t6 KUT dpxas is an adverbial accusative. — avrovs = cIWtjXous. Cf. IV, 10, auTwi', note. — €^ €K£Cvou : i.e., (k /xiKpov Kai raTreivoO. — ii vvv . . . iroiVjo-o- . — dp|ao-i. : inceptive. — ttjv avTTjv 8\)va '^ large enough for. 28. — ov'tm . . . -iroXeis, but we are so wretchedly disposed and trenched apart city by city ; such is our wretched condition of political disunion. I. 62. — ovSe — ovSe, not even — nor even, different from ovre — ovre. H. 1043, 2, a. — o-vo-riivai, to band together. 29.- — ■ yiyv6\Ltvov. H. 982; G. 1585. — tov xP<''"'v . . . l-yvcoKws, each one resolved to make capital out of that time in which another is being destroyed. Such were the mutual jealousies of the Greek states and their blindness to the common danger that each expected to profit by another's loss. — lirel introduces the justification of the im- plication, contained in the words, ovx iVws . . . irpdrTuv, that Greece is in danger. — ircpCoSos . . . KaKov. There seems to be here a mix- ture of similes. A vepiodos irvperov is a recurrence of an (intermittent) fever, and applies to the cases of those Greeks whom Philip had from NOTES. 87 time to time attacked. A Kara^oXrj irvperoO tj tivos &\\ov kukov is an attack of fever or some other disease, and this comparison suggests tiic spread of an epidemic. — tS . . . d4>6orTdvai = tc? vvv doKovvn -irdw 7r6ppw dcpea-Tdmi.. Account for D.'s arrangement of tlie words. 30. — I'o-Tt. Cf. IV, 12, tcrd', note. — dXX' . . . \iytiv, at any rate (dXX' odv — ye) they loere wronged by men who were lawful sons of Hellas, and one would have taken this in the same way as, if a son, lawfully born to a large property, had been managing it not altogether well nor rightly, one would liave held that, so far as that itself went, he ivas worthy of blame and denunciation, but that it was impossible to say that he was acting thus without belonging to the family, or without being heir to this property. After wa-n-ep ^.v supply vw^Xa^e, on which ehai and emrai depend ; cf. VI, 8, wffTrep clu ei, note. Notice that in both this and the following sentence the verbs of the conditions are in the imperfect to denote continued action, those of the conclusions in the aorist to denote momentary action, iirolei is imperfect by attraction ; cf. IV, 2, TrpoffrjKe, note. This effective comparison must not be interpreted too literally ; Athens and Sparta had no rights of ownership which the other states recognized. 31. — •u'troPo\i(jLaios. It was not uncommon in Greece for a child- less wife to attempt to deceive her husband and others by taking another's infant and declaring it to be her own. See the references in L. & S. under vwolBdWu} II, urro^oXij 2, and inro^oXtnaXos. — virep = irepi. Cf. IV, 1, vTT^p wv, note. — ovx ovtws. ovx repeats emphatically the ovx of the preceding line. — ov jaovov . . . "EXXiicrtv. D. consist- ently ignores the tradition which certified to the Hellenic lineage of the Macedonian kings (I. 11), and treats Philip as the representative of his people. Cf. Dem. iii, 16. — €vt€v0€v o0€v KaXov eiiruv (sc. eivai), from those regions from which it is honorable to say that one comes, from a place which can be named with honor. — 6X«6pov. L. & S. 6\e0pos II. — bOev . . . irporepov. For odev referring to Ma/ceSiws, cf. H. 6o3 b. Probably the truth is that there had been few or no Mace- donian slaves in Greece ; which fact, honorable to the Macedonians, is ingeniously but falsely explained by D. as due to their worthless- ness. Some, however, accept D.'s words literally. 32. — ov belongs with each of the following questions. — irpos . • ■ dvTipTiK€vai, in addition to having destroyed cities. — Tl6r\iri, presides over. I. .30. Philip was present at the celebration of the games in 340, but, as our passage indicates, sent In 342 as his representatives Macedonian nobles, whom, as subjects of a king, D. contemptuously calls his slaves (cf. § 43, ' XpOpiov dov\op jSacriX^ws). 88 NOTES. 33. — For historical allusions, see I. 4.3, 41. — t6v 8ii|jlov t6v 'Epe- Tpiewv. 6 'FjpeTpUwv Brj/xos or 6 8i]/j.os 6 'EpeTpiiwf means the Eretrian people, in distinction from the people of any other city ; 6 di}fxos 'EperpUuv means the popular party in Eretria, in distinction from the aristocratic party or the tyrants in the same city. Cf. H. 730 d. Thus, although in both cases drjfxos means a commonalUj, a mass hav- ing equal privileges, the former expression is the one naturally used when the place is the thing of importance, or, in other words, when the emphasis falls on the genitive. — ravO' is object of both bpwvres and dedjpeiv. — opuvres. II. 983 ; G. 1580. — cv^ofi-cvoi, . . . ■y€v€'cr0ai, each praying that it may not fall upon themselves. The idea is that the Greeks regard Philip's movements as being, like a hail-storm, beyond the sphere of their own control, as something to avert which they have no resource biit prayer. 34. — ov fiovov . . . dSiKcirai, And not only does no one take vengeance upon him in view of the insolent treatment which Greece receives at his hands, but not even for the wrongs which each suffers himself. Not only is there an absence of Panhellenic patriotism, but each state is too mean-spirited to redress even its own injui'ies. — toBto . . . ia-nv. ToixTxarov is to be taken as subject, roOro as predicate, the idea being, for this is what the extreme, the climax of his insolence (implied above, § 32, tI T97S eo-xaxT/s l;/3pews diroXeiirei. ;) now amounts to, viz., that each individual is wronged, avrds '^Kaaros ddLKurai.. — ov KopivOicov k.t.X. The pos.sessive genitives stand, for emphasis, at the head of their respective clauses. For the allusions, see I. 42, 43, 47, 4.5. The words /cat vvv . . . 'ovras, which break the rhetorical symmetry of the passage, are regarded by some as spurious, or as belonging in § 33, after KaTauT^qcrovras. With avixixaxovs Suras, understand iavrov. 35. — pXe'ironev, we look askance, or suspiciously. 36. — XoYOD, a reason. — eXcvOepav . . . fiTTaro, maintained Greece in freedom, and gave way to no battle on land or sea; i.e., did not waver before the dangers and hardships of war. — vvv 8' diroXwXos, but which being now lost; or, according to the English idiom, but the loss of which now. Cf. Madvig's Lat. Gram. 420. — ovw KaV Karu, upside down. 37. — 'EXXdSa : dependent equally upon Epxeiv and dtacpdelpeiv, though taking the case required by the latter. — Ti,p.o>pCa ji€"y£orTTj. The receipt of bribes, SwpodoKla, was punished, according to circumstances, by a fine of ten times the amount received, confiscation of property, atimia, or death. Although susceptibility to bribes was always a weak point in the Greek character, Demosthenes is probably right in representing NOTES. 89 that in oarlier times it had met with surer and severer punishment tlian in his own day. — tovtov : i.e., rbv dwpodoKovvTa i^eXeyxO^vra. 38. — Tov . . . -irpaYfidTwv, The opportunity, therefore, for each deed. 39. — worirep . . . tKirt'-irpaTai, have been sold out of market, as it were; the market is exhausted of these commodities. — v((>* . . . 'EWds, thincja through whose influence Greece is sick unto death (lit. is ruined and diseased). — Si^Xos . • . eiriTLnS. The sense is: Nowadays, if a man has received a bribe, he is envied for his good fortune ; if he unblush- ingly parades his guilt (as D. elsewhere accuses Philokrates of doing), it is treated as a joke ; and if a rigid moralist here and there ventures to denounce the crime and the general indifference to it (toi^tois, neuter), he gets only ill-will for his pains. — T]pTT)Tai, depend upon, follow from. 40. — tirel, for. The fact that in material resources the Greeks are better off now than in the time of the Persian "Wars, is introduced as proof that present evils must be attributed to the moral causes just named. — XP^H-"''''**'' ^^^Y depend on cither irXriOos or dipOovia. — rfjs aXXris KaTao-K€\)fis : i.e., arms, engines of war, and the like. — airao-i, all the Greeks. — t«v totc = n rocs t6t€. H. 04-3 b; G. 1155. 41. — "On . . . €X€i, Bid for proof that these things are so. The clause is loosely iirefixed, witliout grammatical dependence. — rd vvv, the present state of things. — -rrpoo-Stio-Oe, need in addition to the testi- mony of your own eyes. — rd Iv tois dvwOev xpovois may be regarded as a nominative, in which case see for its position, IV, 20, toOt clv, note, or as an accusative, the object of St/Xcjo-w, by prolepsis. — rdvav- rla — ivavrlajs. — d . . . dKpoiroXiv. Connect ets aKpSwoKiv with Kard- devTo, eh crTrj\Tjv witla ypd\f/avTes. For the omission of the article with a-KpoTToXiv, see H. 661. 42. — "ApOfiios. The case of Arthmius figures repeatedly in the Greek orators. It is used again by D. xix, 271, by iEschines iii, 258, and by Deinarclius ii, 24. It is also found in a passage of the rheto- rician Aristeides (xiii, 180), on wliicli an extant scholium comments, and is mentioned by Plutarch (Themistokles, 0). As far as can be made out, the facts, as understood by the orators, were these : Arth- mius, of Zeleia in Troas, was, at the time of Xerxes' invasion, a tem- porary resident of Athens, and had been honored by an appointment as Athenian proxenus. Being, however, discovered in an attempt to bribe the Spartans with Persian gold, he was driven from Athens and declared an outlaw, and the sentence was recorded by an inscription set up on the acropolis. — ^r\(riv : sc. rd ypafifxara, the inscription. — dTijios. In the other quotations of this inscription by Demosthenes 90 NOTES. himself, by iEscliines and by Deinarchus, this word, dnno^, of which D. here makes so much, is not found. For its meaning, see below, § 44, note. — xp'""'^^ here = xp^'^^^v- — tov €k MVjSaiv. Cf. § 15, toi;s iK . . . CTT/jartwras, note, 43. — tCs iroe*. Cf . IV, 85, rl d-^ Trore, note. — tJ tC to af Cwnia, or rather ^uhat their sense of dignity. — 8ov\ov Pao-iXtcos. Cf. § 32, 8otj\ovs, note. — ex^P"*' — dTi|j,ovs. Account for the change of number. 44. — The argument is as follows: The atimia to which Arthmius was condemned cannot have been tliat suspension from civil riglits to which this name is ordinarily applied (see Diet. Antiq. , Atimia) ; for this, to a mere metic, would have been no punishment at all. But there is another use of the word iLnixos, found in our ancient Drakonian laws respecting homicide, where it signifies an outlaw, whom any one may kill with impunity. This then nuist be the sense in which the word is used in the inscription. — r\v . . . driixCav, what one would call atimia in the usual sense of the loord; mere ordinary atimia. Cf. L. & S. oyrws IV. — t£ -ydp tG ZeXeixT) (sc. rjv)., For lohat mattered it to theZeleian? — r&v 'ABiivaicov KoivtSv. to. koivo. signifies those rights which all citizens had in common. For the position of the phrase, see IV, 29, tovt hv ■yivT)rai, note. — vfrep . . . 8iKdil0€ipei. This is a dependent question (el ■= whether) ; hence the use of the pres. indie. If the clause were felt to be a con- dition, what would be tlie form of the verbs ? — \Lr\ tovG' v-Tro\a^|3d- vovo-iv (dat. of participle) = d firj tov$' vireXdfj.fiavoi', if they had not NOTES. 1 held thifi opinion. — al'o-Goivro : so. dvovfj-^vov^ Kal Si.aep€iv. Cf. IV, 34, dycav Kal (pipoov, note. — els Sc . . . r\trKr[To.\., hut for a wrestling-?naic/t he is in better training than ive. As distinguished from -n-oXe/xos, which is he-re used of a war carried on at a distance, dywv means a struggle at close quarters, on Attic territory. 53. — ovSt. The force of fj-ovov still continues ; and not only. — t£ XoYio-iiu Kal TTJ SiavoCa, with reason and purpose, with mind and soul. — |jiia-fj(rai. : inceptive. — tovs : to be joined with inrrjperovvras. 54. — |i(opias 1^ TrapavoCas. Cf . IV, 9, daeXydas, note. — ovk €x« ti \iyo), I knoio not what to call it. Ci. § 4. — \t.i] ti . . . eXavvrj, thai some divinity is driving the state to ruin. Goodwin (M. p. 134) con- jectures eXavvsL for iXatJvri ; but the pres. subj. after a verb of fearing sometimes does not differ appreciably from the pres. mdic. in mean- ing ; e.g., Soph. (Ed. R., 747 ; Eur. Medea, 317. — XoiSopCas . . . alrias, for abuse, envy, scoffing, or lohatever reason it may be. This use of rvyxdvw is to be explained as having grown out of an ellipsis of a NOTES. 93 participle to be supplied from the principal sentence (here KeXei/ocres), so that the literal translation would be, for ivhatever cause you may happen to. Cf . IV, 46, fin hv t^xv'^- ^vcku is used here in two senses. With (p96vov and airlas it means because of, with Xoioopias and crKuniiaros, for the sake of. D. often rebukes the Athenian fondness for listening to scurrihty, to which in his legal, though not in his parliamentary orations, he sometimes himself panders. — ws ovk €ls iirl rots irpdyfj-affiv. — 4>iXC'n-Trou : pred. gen. after rii\tTnrov 4>povovvT€s, those who were partisans of Philip ; cf. § 18, TaKeivov (ppovTjaai. The article goes also with a-vKocpavTovvres and Sta^dWovTcs. — oV ■^v i\ TToXis, v}hile the city existed. 57. — For facts, see I. 40, 41. — Ov . . . ovi8a|j,ov, Now not among these only . . . and noiohere else. — ol [uv . . . irpa-yji.aTa, soine loere trying to attach the state to you. ^yov is imperfect of attempted action. — dKovovT€s . . . (idWov (sc. ^ fKdvwv), But lending a readier ear in most matters to these (i.e., the latter). — TcXevTcovrts. H. 9G8 a ; G. 1564 ; L. & S. TeXevrdoi II, 4. 58. — Kal ■ydp toi. See IV, 6, note. — o-ii|x|xaxos. Mo.st editions read 6 ai/xfiaxos, or 6 avp-p-axos Kal (plXoi. The words are bitterly ironical. — o-(o5€o-0ai. As a passive, ffih^eadai means (1) to be saved, (2) to be safe, to ];)rosper, (.3) to escape; as a middle, to save for oneself. Of these meanings, the last two are evidently inapplicable here. We may translate, he has twice already driven them (i.e., the phil-Athenian party), loishing to be rescued, out of the country, and interpret the words /SouXo/Lt^vovs aih^ecrOai to mean that they wished to be saved from the dangerous political situation, from a tyranny supported by Mace- donian arms. 94 NOTES. 59. — Kttl tC . . . aW. Cf. § 25, at the beginning, to. ttoWo. \4yeip = to speak of the great mass of cases, i.e., to go through the rest of the long list. — eirpaTxe 4>iXi'n-jrto, was working for Philip. — ravr* : i.e., OTL ^Cklw-Kifi TrpaTTovcriv. — Evnj)paios : SC. tirpaTTe, upon which the clause Swcas . . . iaovrai depends. Cf. above, § 56, wpdTTovTes, note. — avOpwiros . . . olKi^o-as. Tlie allusion to Euphraeus's residence in Athens — where he is said to have been a disciple of Plato — is made with pride; the suggestion is that his love of liberty was acquired there. 60. — ovTos . . ■ Sifjuov, As to how this man was in other (lit. the other) ways insulted and foully wronged by the people, it would be possible to tell a long story, to, aWa is cogn. obj. of the verbs which follow. For its position and that of oCtos befoi-e ws, see IV, 29, tout &p, note. TO, axXa means the other wrongs than the one about to be named. — €V£S£i|€v, indicted. — xopri-yov . . . Trpwrave-uoiAevoi (sc. inr' avrov), having Philip as their choregus and prytanis, i.e., acting under Philip's direction. — dird-yovo-i. L. & S. aTrdyw IV, 3. 61. — clvtI . . . dTroTviAiravio-ai, instead of helping him (Euphrseus) and cudgeling them (Philistides and his partisans) to death. — lirtT'^Stiov, deserving, in predicate agreement with rbv. — lir' . . . T|Poii\ovTo, with as much freedom as they wished. For ottoo-t/s, see § 25, ols, note. — KareoTKevd^ovTo ttiv irpdiiv, were maturing their scheme. — twv iroXXoav. Cf . IV, 29, TovT cLv, note. — lo-i-ya Kal KaTeTre'irXiiKTo, was silent and terror-stricken, was silent from terror. — Evs — ovras is distributed into tovs p-kv and Toiis 5k, .some and others; cf. VI, 11. 63. — TC . . . £X€iv, What in the loorld, then, is the cause, perhaps you wonder, of the fact that . . . were more favorably disposed. An in- finitive depending upon ainos may stand (1) without the article, or (2) in the genitive with roO, or (.3) in the accusative, as here, with t6. ex^"' refers to past time. — otrtp . . . on, It is the fact which with you also is the cause of the same conduct, the fact, namely, that ; it is, as in your case also, the fact that. — ov8€ PovXo|i€vois, not even if they wish to. — irpos X^P''"- S^® -^^i ^^5 ""P"^ vdovrjv, note. — ol 8* . . . o-wji- NOTES. 95 irpdTTOvo-iv, but the others, in their ver7j flatteries, cooperate with Philip, iv oh is probably to be understood as standing for in tovtois a. The clause oh xo-p^^ovrat, being treated exactly like a substantive, has the intensive avrois agreeing witli it. 64. — «lep€iv, to pay taxes; of. IV, 7. — tK^Xtuov. The implied subject of this verb is oi vw^p toO ^eXrla-rov XiyovTes, which, in view of the following old', would be regularly represented here by oi niv. The context, however, leaves no doubt as to who are meant, and a certain emphasis seems to be gained by the omission. Rather different are the cases where the sentence starts out with no intention of a contrast, but by an afterthought a clause with ol Si is added; e.g., Xen. Hell. 1, 2, 14, ipxo'''''o f's Ae/cAeia;', oi 5e eh M^yapa. — ToWa . . . irdvO'. The words rdXXa iravra may be regarded as the object of some such word as iTTolovv understood. H. 612. In the same way, I think, with eoery- thing else. — 'iva . . . \^-y<>> : cf. § 8, tv evrevOev Ap^w/xai, note. — ot \iiv are the same as the ol 5' above. — l' ols x*P''0'''''''«»'i( by which (lit. on which) they loould please. — -iroXXd . . . evojii^ov, And many thinrjs at the last the people accepted, not so much for their own pleasure even nor on account of Ignorance, as sinking in despair, since they thought that they were utterly ruined; i.e., at the last, seeing that their ruin was inevitable, they lost heart and let things take their course. TroXXd Kal rd reXevTaia literally = many and the last things, or to. reXeuTata may be used adverbially, at last. — In place of oide — oiidi, most MSS. read cure — cure. For the difference, see § 28, note, irpbs x'^-P'-" is gener- ally interpreted, in order to please, i.e., out of complaisance toward the statesmen, but perhaps it is used in the sense given above in the translation : cf. H. 805 c, end. ol troWoi means the people, as distin- guished from the statesmen. dXX', but, is here used instead of (Js, as, after ovx ov'tus; similarly we sometimes find oi) yuaXXov — dWd. For Tots SXois, see L. & S, , SXos II, 2. 65. — o k.tA. D.'s fear is that the Athenians in like manner will become disheartened and succumb. — iTd6T)T€. L. & S. irdcrxw III, 2. — €ireiSdv . . . €v6v, when you know by carefid consideration thai nothing is in your power, that it is all over with you. %veip.L, in the sense to be possible is regularly followed by the simple dative, and the ev of our text is omitted by most MSS. and editions. — Kairou . . . ^tXtirirov, But now may affairs not come, men of Athens, to this pass (i.e., to a pass in which you can no longer do anything that will help you) ; but (if they should) it is better to die ten thousand deaths than to do anything in the loay of fawning upon Philip. Expressions like Tidvdvai p.vp{,dKii, milies perire, are common in Greek and Latin. 96 NOTES. The combination of fxvpidKis witli Kpe?TToi> is also admissible (cl. I'lat. Rep. 587 e). 66. — KaX'^v V . . • X*P''''j (('fine return have the masses of Oreos now received, ye adds emphasis to the ironical Ko.\r)v. — ewOovv, were repelling, strove against; a prolonged act, and hence expressed by the imperf . — |iao-Ti-yov|ji£voi Kal o- rjfjuv tcrrt to jSovXevecrOai 7re/3i Toi) iroTepov eiprjvTjv ayetr t) TvoXefXtiv Sci. 2. At the end of § 32, after irip-Tru : Kvpiw; Se IliiXai;/ Kat roij/ €7ri tovs 'EAA'jyvas irapoSoiV ia-Ti, kuI (fipuvpati, . / ■ • • 1-25 Whiton: Orations of Lysias \ i.oo GINN AND COMPANY Publishers I iL2&Aavaaii-^^ ^^Anvaaiii'^ ^^WE•UNIVER%: ^lOSANCElfx^ o , so >• so ,^WE•UNIVER% Q %a3AIN(l-3WV ^l-lIBRARYOc^ ^IIIBRARYQ^ 5? %OJI1V3JO^ '^JO>' AWEUNIVERS'/a 9 ^lOSANCElfXx V f _ f >. ^« r< >&Aavaaii-^'^^ ^^AHvyHii-^s^ ^lllBRARY<3^ ,.«>^IIIBRARY