UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS. 
 
 COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE. 
 
 AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL 
 
 By J. S. HUNTER. 
 
 Small Orchard and Vineyard Defoliated by Grasshoppers. 
 
 BULLETIN No. 170. 
 
 (Berkeley, June, 1905.) 
 
 SACRAMENTO: 
 w. w. shannon, : : : : superintendent state printing. 
 
 1905. 
 
BENJAMIN IDE WHEELER, Ph.D.. LL.D., President of the University. 
 
 EXPERIMENT STATION STAFF. 
 
 E. W. HILGARD, Ph.D., LL.D., Director and Chemist. (Absent on leave.) 
 
 E.J- WICKSON, M. A., Acting Director and Horticulturist. 
 
 W. A. SETCHELL, Ph.D., Botanist. 
 
 ELWOOD MEAD, M.S., C.E , Irrigation Engineer. 
 
 C. W. WOODWORTH, M.S., Entomologist. 
 
 R. H. LOUGHRIDGE, Ph.D., Agricultural Geologist and Soil Physicist. (Soils and Alkali.) 
 
 M. E. JAFFA, M.S., Assistant Chemist. (Foods. Nutrition.) 
 
 G. W. SHAW, M.A., Ph.D., Assistant Chemist. (Starches, Oils, Beet-Sugar.) 
 
 GEORGE E. COLBY, M.S., Assistant Chemist. (Fruits, Waters, Insecticides.) 
 
 RALPH E- SMITH, B.S., Plant Pathologist. 
 
 A. R. WARD, B.S.A., D.V.M., Veterinarian and Bacteriologist. 
 
 E. W. MAJOR, B.Agr., Animal Industry. 
 
 A. V. STUBENRAUCH, M.S., Assistant Horticulturist, in charge of Substations. 
 
 E. H. TWIGHT, B.Sc, Diplome E.A.M., Viticulturist. 
 
 F. T. BIOLETTI, M S , Viticulturist. 
 
 WARREN T. CLARKE, B.S., Assistant Field Entomologist. 
 H. M. HALL, M.S , Assistant Botanist. 
 
 , Assistant Entomologist. 
 
 GEORGE ROBERTS, M.S., Assistant Chemist, in charge of Fertilizer Control. 
 C. M HARING, D.V. M., Assistant Veterinarian and Bacteriologist. 
 C. A. COLMORE, B.S , Clerk to the Director. 
 
 R. E- MANSELL. Foreman of Central Station Grounds. 
 
 JOHN TUOHY. Patron, ) 
 
 - Tulare Substation, Tulare. 
 , Foreman, ) 
 
 \ Southern California Substation. 
 
 J. E McCOMAS, Patron, Pomona, 
 
 J. W. MILLS, Superintendent, Poniona, 
 
 In charge Cooperation Experiments in Southern California, 
 
 , Assistant Superintendent, Ontario, 
 
 J. W. ROPER, Patron, ) 
 
 V University Forestry Station, Chico. 
 HENRY WIGHTMAN, In charge, ) 
 
 ROY JONES, Patron, ) 
 
 [- University Forestry Station, Santa Monica. 
 -, Foreman, ) 
 
 VINCENT J HUNTLEY, Foreman of California Poultry Experiment Station, Petaluma. 
 
 The Station publications (Reports and Bulletins), so long as avail- 
 able, will be sent to any citizen of the State on application. 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL 
 
 By J. S. HUNTER. 
 
 Introductory Note. — The present bulletin presents some of the results obtained in a 
 rather extensive and quite successful effort to prevent grasshopper injury. The work 
 was started by myself in 1903, with the assistance of Mr. William La Grange, a student in 
 the department; but the success of the practical work has been largely due to Mr. J. S. 
 Hunter, whose energy and persistence through the campaign of 1904 has not only 
 resulted in the prevention of extensive injury during that season, but has also taught 
 the ranchers in the affected section so well that serious damage will probably not be 
 permitted to occur again in that region. 
 
 The work was rendered possible through the hearty cooperation of the people of 
 
 that section, and I wish particularly to mention the financial support afforded us by the 
 
 firm of Hultberg & Soderberg, of Turlock, and the personal interest of their manager, 
 
 Mr. Hallmer. 
 
 C. W. WOODWORTH. 
 
 During the summer of 1904 grasshoppers did extensive damage in 
 several sections of the San Joaquin Valley. Perhaps the most seriously 
 infested region was in Merced County, where a great deal of injury was 
 done. The two- localities particularly infested with the insects were a 
 district bordering on Stanislaus County, south of Turlock, and the 
 country immediately south of Newman. 
 
 Grasshoppers began to be observed at Turlock early in May. The 
 insects had done considerable damage in this region during the previous 
 summer, and an attempt had been made by the University to locate 
 accurately and stake out the breeding grounds, in order that they might 
 be plowed by the ranchers during the following fall or winter, or at 
 least to afford a knowledge of the places most liable to be affected this 
 year. The breeding grounds were not plowed, nor were they watched 
 in the early spring for the purpose of attacking the young grasshoppers 
 as early as possible after they emerge from the eggs. They appeared in 
 much greater numbers than in 1903. Hatching must have occurred in 
 April or earlier, for when we were notified in the middle of May the 
 grasshoppers were almost grown and threatened to devastate the country. 
 At the very urgent request of the people of the Hilmar Colony, the 
 writer was sent to superintend a campaign against the grasshoppers in 
 that district. 
 
 In order to explain the situation thoroughly a brief description of the 
 infested regions may be necessary. At Turlock grasshoppers first began 
 to do damage in what is known as the Hilmar Colony, comprising some 
 six or seven thousand acres. Formerly this land was all planted to 
 wheat and rye, but for a number of years previous to being colonized 
 in 1902 it had been left idle, so that it had approximately reverted 
 
4 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 to its original condition. At present about half the land is under 
 cultivation, being for the most part planted to young orchards, vine- 
 yards, alfalfa, and ordinary field crops. In many cases these cultivated 
 places are surrounded by uncultivated fields. It was in this idle land 
 that the grasshoppers of the previous year had deposited their eggs, 
 and consequently it was here that they first were noticed, moving 
 afterwards on to the green crops in the cultivated portions. 
 
 At Newman the grasshopper-infested district on the other hand is, 
 so to speak, one large alfalfa field, which is divided into smaller ranches. 
 The grasshoppers were more or less numerous on about two or three 
 thousand acres. 
 
 The grasshoppers in this region began to work during May, but were 
 not regarded as a serious matter by the ranchers until a month later, 
 
 Fig. 1. Long-legged Grasshopper (Clinopleura melanopleura), female. Notice long ovipositor. 
 
 about the first of July, when the University was appealed to for aid, 
 since the losses had become so evident that the ranchers were thoroughly 
 aroused. 
 
 There were two species of grasshoppers that did the greater part of 
 the injury, and four other species that were abundant enough to con- 
 tribute materially to the losses sustained. Other species were also 
 present, but not in sufficiently large numbers. Several of these might, 
 however, under favorable conditions, become as troublesome as those 
 discussed in this bulletin. 
 
 The Long-legged Grasshopper (Clinopleura melanopleura), Figs. 1 and 
 2, the least injurious of the four species, is a katydid. This species was 
 found at Turlock, and in some parts of the colony was very common, 
 but still not numerous enough on any cultivated portion to do damage 
 had the species been alone, but it did augment, quite appreciably, the 
 loss occasioned by the more prevalent grasshoppers. 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 
 
 The Pale-winged Grasshopper (Melanoplus uniformis), Fig. 3. — This 
 species was, during the summer of 1903, the most troublesome kind in 
 the region southeast of Turlock. It 
 was the first species to be noticed fly- 
 ing in any considerable number, and 
 the only truly migratory grasshopper 
 that was found at either Turlock or 
 Newman. It is a rather restless species 
 after becoming winged, and as a rule 
 did not remain in any one spot long 
 enough to do any perceptible damage. 
 A considerable swarm has been ob- 
 served feeding on a field of. alfalfa 
 during a month without apparently 
 injuring the crop. 
 
 The first movement of this species 
 was noticed after a high northwest 
 wind on June 2d and 3d. Many 
 swarms of grasshoppers were seen 
 flying, for the most part, in a north- 
 easterly direction. Swarms of grass- 
 hoppers at this time came on to land 
 that previously had been free. After 
 this for a month, during the last hours 
 of the day and when the wind was 
 not blowing hard, grasshoppers could 
 be seen moving toward the northeast. Toward the middle of July the 
 flight seemed to be in a northwesterly direction. At no time, however, 
 was there another as general a movement as the one that occurred on 
 
 June 5th. During the latter 
 part of September a swarm of 
 grasshoppers that had estab- 
 lished themselves on a large 
 idle field northwest of Turlock 
 took wing and flew rather low 
 over the town in a south- 
 easterly direction. 
 
 This species seemed to be 
 rather slow in coming to full 
 maturity; pairing was not ob- 
 served previous to the middle 
 of August. Egg-laying was under way by the first week in October, and 
 at that time nearly all the females contained well-developed eggs. 
 
 The Devastating Grasshopper (Melanoplus devastator). — Late in June 
 grasshoppers were reported as doing extensive damage in the foothill 
 
 Fig. 
 
 2. Long-legged Grasshopper (Clino- 
 pleura melanopleura) , male. 
 
 Fig. 3. 
 
 Pale-winged Grasshopper (Melanoplus 
 uniformis), male. 
 
6 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA— EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 region below Mariposa. It was thought best to make a trip through 
 that region and learn, if possible, what danger there was of the grass- 
 hoppers moving down into the valley. The territory from Snelling to 
 Raymond and from White Rock to as high as Wawona was thoroughly 
 gone over. Grasshoppers were found more or less over the entire 
 region, but only in certain sections were particularly abundant. The 
 species M. devastator is a true foothill species and has often developed 
 migratory habits. Egg-laying, as a rule, is done almost exclusively in 
 the foothills. According to the reports, about once in seven to nine 
 years they become so numerous that all the cultivated land in the foot- 
 hills will be stripped, sometimes even taking the leaves from the oak 
 trees. At such times there is danger of their moving into the valley. 
 In 1904 they were nowhere near as thick as they had been in years past. 
 None of the methods that are practical in the control of the grass- 
 hoppers in the lower valley seem to be very much so in the foothills. 
 Burning is about the only method that can be used. If the grass- 
 hoppers are confined to a 
 small area and a sufficient 
 force of men is obtained so 
 that the fire can be kept 
 under control, it will of 
 course destroy the insects. 
 A fire once beyond control, 
 however, will sweep over 
 valuable pasture lands and 
 might work up into the still 
 more valuable timber lands 
 farther up in the hills. 
 Poisoning is hardly to be considered in the breeding-grounds, because 
 of the large area to be covered, but might be useful in the smali culti- 
 vated portion, though even there the grasshoppers may work in from 
 the outside in such large numbers that all vegetation will be destroyed. 
 The grass on the ranges is seldom permanently injured by the work 
 of the grasshoppers, the loss in this region being confined to the few 
 fruit trees around the ranch houses and to garden spots. In some cases 
 this year these gardens had been most thoroughly cleaned out. One 
 patch of corn was seen where nothing was left but the hard outside por- 
 tion of the stalk, the pith even being excavated by the insects. 
 
 Hesperotettix Sp. — This species, which was rather abundant at New- 
 man, is much smaller than the dominant form and is dark brown in 
 color. The males are very short-winged, the wings not reaching half 
 way to the end of the body. The females are much longer-winged. 
 Although rather abundant, the damage done could scarcely be noticed 
 alongside of that done by the larger M. differ entialis. The species, on 
 account of its short wings, is easily caught in the dozer. Pairing was 
 
 Fig. 4. Valley Grasshopper (<Edaleoiwtns enigma). 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 
 
 under way during the latter part of June. Those noticed laying eggs 
 did not do so in the ordinary manner, the hole, on account of the size 
 of the species, not being very deep and for the most part drilled straight 
 into the ground. 
 
 The Valley Grasshopper {(Edaleonotus enigma), Figs. 4 and 5. — This 
 species was by far the most destructive at Turlock, causing fully ninety 
 per cent of the losses. It was present throughout the entire Turlock dis- 
 trict, being most numerous in the Hilmar Colony. Both the short- and 
 the long-winged forms were noted, the former being the more common. 
 There was some migration in the case of the long-winged form of this 
 species, but not so much as for M. uniformis. The species reached 
 maturity about June 1st. Pairing was first noted on June 2d, but it was 
 not until the 24th of the same month that eggs were found, on dissection, 
 large enough to be laid. Up to the middle of August, however, although 
 careful watch was kept, no grasshoppers were 
 found laying eggs, but on a trip to the region 
 in the early part of October, both this species 
 and M. uniformis were found laying in con- 
 siderable numbers in certain fields. 
 
 The egg-laying is not greatly different from 
 that of most other species of grasshoppers. 
 With the four hard horny points on the end 
 of the abdomen, the female drills a hole in the 
 ground about half an inch deep. She then 
 ejects a small amount of a white, frothy paste, 
 and then places the eggs in regular order hori- 
 zontally until all of the developed eggs in the 
 oviduct are deposited. With each successive 
 layer she ejects more of the same frothy sub- 
 stance, which soon hardens, forming an almost 
 waterproof capsule around each egg-mass and 
 cementing the eggs firmly together. More of this substance is used for 
 rilling the hole. She then draws, with the end of the abdomen, small 
 grains of dirt over the hole, covering it so securely that even with the 
 closest observation it can seldom be found. The places usually chosen 
 for egg-laying are those thinly covered with vegetation and where the 
 ground is rather firm — the most compact soil, indeed, found in the 
 region ; but the Turlock soil is for the most part comparatively loose 
 and sandy. The full complement of eggs is usually placed in one hole. 
 This will be normally about twenty-five. 
 
 The egg-laying of the previous species is almost identical with that of 
 0. enigma, but perhaps with greater care taken in concealing the hole. 
 Both species are easily disturbed when laying, and will quickly jump 
 or fly from the hole. 
 
 Fig 5. Valley Grasshopper. 
 {(Edaleonotus en igma). 
 
8 
 
 UNIVERSITY OP CALIFORNIA— EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 THE CAMPAIGN AT TURLOCK. 
 
 Burning the Young Grasshoppers.- — During the first few weeks of the 
 work against the grasshoppers the method of destruction employed was 
 that of fire. This we found could be effectively used only on land that 
 had considerable grass. The greater part of the grass and weeds at 
 that time of the year is dry enough to burn freely, but a great deal of the 
 land affected by grasshoppers was rather bare. When the fire travels 
 fast everything is swept before it, the grasshoppers being killed before 
 they hardly have time to leap. When the fire progresses slowly they 
 may at first jump about confusedly ahead of the fire; and when the fire 
 
 Fig. 6. The preparation of the " firing line." 
 
 comes near them, they become bewildered and attempt to hide in the 
 grass.. Some may occasionally escape by crawling into holes in the 
 ground, others by hiding in a patch of weeds too green to burn. For 
 the most part, however, until large enough to fly, the flames destroy at 
 least ninety per cent of the hoppers. 
 
 Burning the Winged Form. — After nearly three thousand acres of 
 land had been burned the grasshoppers on unburned land had devel- 
 oped wings. These enabled so many of them to escape the flames that 
 it was considered useless, except under unusual conditions, to depend 
 on burning. The best results then seemed to come from night work. 
 
 The nights being cool, the grasshoppers were not as active as during 
 the day and many more were caught by the flames, but still the work 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL 
 
 9 
 
 was not as successful as during the nymph stage. Enough were killed, 
 however, to amply pay for the trouble of burning the grass. Unusually 
 oool and windy nights were found to be the best. Under these condi- 
 tions the grasshoppers were less active, and with the flames sweeping 
 rapidly across a field most of the grasshoppers would be caught. The 
 most successful results were obtained by firing from both sides of the 
 field. Where the insects were thick a line of dead grasshoppers could 
 be distinctly seen where two such fires came together. 
 
 Burning was more successful with 0. enigma than with M. uniformis, 
 the former not being as active. That species could possibly also be 
 destroyed more effectively by burning later in the season than at an 
 
 Fig. 7. Burned area on the right, showing control of fire by " firing line." 
 
 earlier date, on account of the fact that the wings become frayed out 
 and the bodies heavier, so that the grasshoppers would be less able to 
 fly out of the flames. 
 
 Burning is to be recommended only where the pasture burned over is 
 of no great value and where the grasshoppers are seriously threatening 
 orchards or other cultivated fields. Care will always have to be taken 
 that the fire is kept under perfect control, as any damage resulting can 
 be charged to the person starting the fire. 
 
 Poisoning the Grasshoppers. — After burning was done, the grasshop- 
 pers that escaped moved into cultivated fields. These fields may be 
 divided into two classes; alfalfa and other field crops forming one class, 
 and orchards and vineyards the other. 
 
 The most successful means of fighting grasshoppers in orchards and 
 
10 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 vineyards was by poisoned bait. The " Criddle mixture, " recently 
 highly recommended in the East, did not prove very satisfactory. The 
 formula is as follows: 100 pounds of horse dung, 1 pound of paris 
 green or powdered arsenic, and 2 pounds of salt, adding enough water to 
 moisten but not make soggy. The failure of this mixture was because 
 very few of the grasshoppers were found to eat it at all. This may be 
 attributed to the fact that under the dry condition of the interior valleys 
 the mixture would dry out too rapidly. At any rate, it did not seem 
 to have any power of attracting the grasshoppers. Probably later in 
 the season this formula might have been used more successfully, judging 
 from the fact that, although early in the summer very few grasshoppers 
 were seen on the piles of horse-droppings along the roads, later in the 
 year such piles would be covered with the hungry insects. The mix- 
 ture can not be recommended except where the grasshoppers are observed 
 to be attracted by horse-droppings. 
 
 Far different was the experience with the formula of grasshopper 
 poison that has been used so many years in various parts of California. 
 The proportions used were: 
 
 Bran 40 pounds 
 
 Molasses (cheap) .. 2 gallon- 
 Arsenic 5 pounds 
 
 The above amounts of material will be enough to fill a good-sized 
 tub. It will be found easier to mix only .half the given amounts at a 
 time. The stronger 'smelling molasses used seemed to be the more 
 attractive to the grasshoppers. In a number of cases where molasses 
 could not be obtained, black honey was tried, but it did not seem to be 
 as good as the molasses for attracting the insects. Paris green can be 
 used in place of arsenic, but the latter is considerably cheaper, costing^ 
 in quantities, less than ten cents a pound. 
 
 In order to get the best results from the bait, considerable care must 
 be taken in mixing it. It was found most successful to mix the bran 
 with enough water that a lump held in the hand will only slightly 
 drip unless squeezed. The molasses can then be added, mixing it thor- 
 oughly with the hands. After this has been well done, the arsenic 
 can be added. This can be worked into the bran with the hands or 
 with a paddle. There may be some danger in using the hands to mix 
 this poison if there are cuts or sores, and care should be taken in 
 removing any arsenic that may have lodged around the finger nails. 
 
 Another method is to mix the arsenic and bran in a barrel with a 
 shovel, or in a mortar-bed with a hoe; then dilute the molasses with 
 water and work it in as in mixing mortar. In any case, mix it thor- 
 oughly. It is a good plan to let the material stand from twelve to 
 twenty-four hours, then remix it, so as to allow the arsenic that is 
 dissolved to soak well into the bran. 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 11 
 
 The usual practice is to place as much poisoned bait as can be held 
 in a soup-spoon in a pile on the ground; or, perhaps better, on a shingle 
 at the base of each tree or vine. If the grasshoppers are coming into 
 the orchard from one side only, poison need only be placed along the 
 first six or eight rows of trees. It was found very effective in such cases 
 to place a series of piles of poison, about a foot apart, along the threat- 
 ened side. As soon as the poison is dry it should be moistened, as the 
 grasshoppers will not eat much of it when it is dry.. In our experi- 
 ments it was found that when properly mixed, the bait was evidently 
 preferred to the foliage of fruit trees. The placing of the poison on 
 a board is recommended in order that it may be gathered up after 
 the danger from grasshoppers is over. Serious results to stock may 
 accrue if the poison is left in the field and cattle be allowed to get 
 hold of it. 
 
 In some cases the poison was scattered broadcast over the orchard, 
 but the results obtained were by no means as satisfactory as from the 
 other method. The poison in such cases dried quicker and afterwards 
 could not be remoistened conveniently. 
 
 When grasshoppers are gathered in bunches, as along irrigation 
 ditches, they can be poisoned by the thousand. A striking illustration 
 of the immediate effectiveness of the poison occurred in a large pasture. 
 There the grasshoppers had bunched in the shade of six or eight locust 
 trees around an old, deserted ranch house, and when first found, they 
 covered the ground and were crawling up the trunks of the trees 
 by thousands to get the green leaves. Poison was put out, and on the 
 following day fully seventy-five per cent of the swarm were dead, and 
 a few days later scarcely a live grasshopper could be found. In places 
 the ground was completely covered by dead grasshoppers. 
 
 While live stock, and especially chickens, are very liable to be poi- 
 soned if they are allowed to have access to the grasshopper poison, 
 there seems to be very little danger of poisoning beneficial wild birds; 
 for careful watch was kept while the poison was out for any that might 
 have got hold of either the poison or the dead grasshoppers, and not a 
 single dead bird was found. 
 
 Effect of Poison on the Grasshopper. — When the grasshoppers are 
 hungry, as they are when they come in from the dry pastures, they 
 very greedily eat the bran. In some cases they piled up on the poison 
 so that nothing could be seen but a mass of struggling, kicking insects. 
 
 After eating until gorged, the grasshopper crawls slowly away, hunt- 
 ing a shady spot. There it remains quiet until the effect of the poison 
 becomes more acute; then a twitching or kicking of the rear legs will 
 be noticed. These convulsions become quite violent in some cases; in 
 others, there will be none at all. It is usually from eight to ten hours 
 before any dead will be noticed. Afterwards they die slowly for about 
 
12 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 eight hours more; from eighteen to twenty-four hours the greatest death- 
 rate occurs. As soon as grasshoppers begin to die, the ones that have not 
 yet eaten poison will begin to eat the dead ones. Numbers will be 
 killed in this manner, but it is not known for how many successive 
 individuals it will be effective. In orchards w T here clean cultivation is 
 practiced, the poison is more effective than in those where weeds are 
 allowed to grow. All species of grasshoppers do not take the poison 
 as freely as 0. enigma. M. uniformis is one of these. As a rule, the 
 more active the grasshoppers, the less likely are they to take the poison. 
 
 If grasshoppers come into the orchard in such numbers that they 
 must be taken care of at once, more active and quicker methods of 
 protecting the trees must be employed. 
 
 The use of the hopper dozer is not as effective in the orchard as 
 in the alfalfa fields. In fact, when the grasshoppers are on the trees 
 and not on the ground, not enough will be caught to pay for running 
 the dozer. In vineyards a dozer can be used more successfully. The 
 use and construction of the hopper dozer is given later in this bulletin 
 under a different heading. 
 
 In young orchards, two or three years old, it is a very good plan to 
 wrap the trunks of the trees with strips of cloth. This not only protects 
 the bark from grasshoppers, but, in case the leaves are eaten, it prevents 
 the bark from becoming sunburned. If it is only a drifting swarm that 
 temporarily threatens the orchard, and the trees are not too large or too 
 many, they can be covered with sacks of burlap or other cloth. It will 
 be necessary to tie the sacks securely around the trunks and leave no 
 holes large enough for grasshoppers to crawl through, or they will get 
 inside and badly injure the tree. These sacks can not usually be left 
 for any great length of time, or the tree will be weakened. However, 
 some small orchards at Turlock that were covered for a month or longer 
 came through very nicely. Yearling vines were saved in some cases by 
 turning the soil over them with a cultivator. In such cases the soil 
 must be taken away as soon as the danger is past. Even then the vines 
 may be killed. 
 
 Smoking the Grasshoppers. — The two species of grasshoppers common 
 to Turlock can be smoked or smudged out. Very good results were 
 obtained by placing piles of rather damp manure on the windward side 
 of the orchard and other piles in rows, a hundred yards apart, through 
 the orchard. This manure, when burning, gives off a dense smoke, 
 which is not liked by most species of grasshoppers. When once on the 
 wing, they will keep on flying until entirely out of the smoke. It was 
 found more satisfactory to go through the orchard after the smudges were 
 started and shake the trees, forcing the grasshoppers to take wing. 
 Smoking as long as the grasshoppers threaten the orchard proved very 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 
 
 13 
 
 successful in numerous cases. During cool nights smoking was not suc- 
 cessful, nor was it as a rule successful early in the forenoon or late in 
 the afternoon. 
 
 Crude oil makes a very good smoke, but under usual conditions is too 
 expensive to be used extensively. Any substance that will make a good 
 pungent smoke will be satisfactory. A small quantity of sulfur may 
 be put on the fire, but there is considerable danger of causing the leaves 
 to drop from the trees if the fires are too close or too much sulfur is 
 used. 
 
 Smoking was most successful when there was a rather stiff breeze 
 blowing, so as to keep the smoke close to the ground. In connection 
 with the smoke, one very good way of trapping the grasshoppers was 
 by putting rows of straw, sprinkled with water sweetened with strong 
 molasses, on the leeward side of the orchard. Many of the grasshop- 
 
 
 Fig. 8. Hopper dozer with strainer to save the oil removed from the pans when the 
 
 grasshoppers are shoveled out. 
 
 pers, on coming to this straw, will take refuge in it, being attracted by 
 the molasses odor. Later in the day, when they become less active, 
 this straw can be burned. The same method can be used when grass- 
 hoppers are coming into a field from an adjoining one. In some cases 
 they will gather on the straw in sufficient numbers to cover it. 
 
 Sometimes the grasshoppers come in so persistently that more 
 extreme methods must be used in order to save the trees. One farmer, 
 in addition to poison, smoke, dozers, and other methods, had his entire 
 family turn out before daylight in the morning to kill the grasshoppers 
 on the trees. On account of his energy and persistence, he lost very 
 few trees from the pest. His place was one around which the grass- 
 hoppers were thicker and more persistent than around any other farm 
 in the locality. 
 
 Unless the trimming done by the grasshoppers is too severe, it results 
 only in the setting back of the trees for that year. If the leaves and 
 bark are stripped from the limbs, the tree will usually die. In all 
 
14 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 cases after the grasshoppers had stripped the trees, it was found best to 
 irrigate them as soon as Avater could be obtained. In a number of 
 cases, although the trees were very severely trimmed, they put out new 
 leaves and quite a growth was made before fall. Vines, for the most 
 part, stand the severe treatment much more successfully than trees, 
 provided they are not allowed to suffer for water. Vines two years 
 old or over will stand very severe pruning by grasshoppers. 
 
 HOPPER DOZERS. 
 
 In alfalfa, when the grasshoppers began to do damage, they were 
 destroyed very successfully by means of hopper dozers. A hopper 
 dozer may be made in the form of a long, shallow pan of galvanized 
 iron, placed on runners, with a back of stovepipe iron about 3 feet 
 
 Fig. 9. Hopper dozer with burlap backstop and braced ends. 
 
 high. The pan is partially filled with crude oil, a horse is hitched to 
 either end, and the machine dragged across the grasshopper-infested 
 field. The grasshoppers jump at the approach of the dozer and, striking 
 the back of the pan, fall into the oil and are quickly killed. The dozer 
 can be made of any convenient length up to 16 or 20 feet. The longer 
 the dozer, the more quickly a field can be gone over. Where the check 
 system of irrigation is used and the checks are small, a large dozer can 
 not be conveniently used. But where the checks are large and levees 
 low, or where the furrow system is used, the longer lengths are more 
 desirable. 
 
 Construction of a Dozer. — For a dozer 16 or 20 feet long, a strong 
 frame or platform is necessary. The pan can be made in one piece 16 
 feet long and 28 or 30 inches wide, turned up in front about 3 inches 
 and behind about 4 or 6 inches. Three or four cross partitions are 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 
 
 15 
 
 necessary to keep the oil from running to one end when that end hap- 
 pens to be lower than the other, or the pan can be made in shorter 
 lengths of the same width, placed end to end. If in short lengths, lighter 
 iron can be used and consequently will not cost as much as the heavy. 
 Galvanized iron from No. 20 to 26 will be satisfactory for this pan. 
 
 In the construction of the platform on which the pan is to be placed, 
 it should be borne in mind that the closer the pan is to the ground the 
 more grasshoppers will be caught. Where several short pans are used, 
 it will be necessary to have a frame into which they can be set and held 
 firmly. Such will also be necessary where light iron is used for a long 
 pan. No. 20 iron is stiff enough as that there is considerable strength 
 to it alone, and it is not necessary to have such a strong frame as for 
 
 Fig. 10. Wide hopper dozer in operation in alfalfa field. 
 
 the lighter iron. At least five runners are necessary on a 16-foot dozer. 
 These can be made of old wagon tires, bent up in front. Three 
 of them should be turned at right angles at the back, in order that 
 uprights may be fastened to them that will hold the backstop. Two- or 
 three-inch boards fastened to these runners will protect the bottom of 
 the pan from wear. The 2 by 4 piece in front must be very strong; and 
 in order that the full width of the dozer be available, the ends should 
 extend beyond the pan at least 2 feet. A board at the back, set on edge, 
 will give additional strength. A cross-piece should be placed at the 
 other end of the pan to hold it from sliding. The figure on page 14 will 
 show the method of constructing a very serviceable dozer. It was found 
 best to use stovepipe iron for the backstop, as the grasshoppers, on 
 striking it, would fall immediately into the oil. Burlap was used at 
 first, but on striking it many of the grasshoppers would cling thereto 
 
16 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA— EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 and escape without getting oil enough to kill them even though the 
 oloth was saturated with it. A brace and a backstop fastened to the 
 ends of the dozer directly behind the horses will be found to improve 
 the machine. 
 
 After the dozer is run for a few minutes, so many grasshoppers will 
 be caught that those which jump into the pan will not get enough oil 
 on them to kill them. It will then be necessary to clean the grass- 
 hoppers from the pan. A good-sized box with the bottom knocked out 
 and a piece of half-inch mesh wire put on in place of it, will be found 
 very convenient for straining the oil from the grasshoppers when they 
 are shoveled out of the pan. 
 
 If the bottom of the dozer pan is not well protected, it will soon wear 
 out. It was found that with a good dozer and a team of fast-walking 
 
 Fig. 11. Differential grasshopper (Melanoplus differentialis). 
 
 horses, the grasshoppers could be cleaned out of a field to such an extent 
 that the damage done by those left would not be noticed. 
 
 Some species of grasshoppers, being less active, are more easily caught. 
 0. enigma, during the hot part of the day, are so active that until the 
 wings become worn, a large part of them will fly over the backstop. 
 The best success in combating both this species and M. uniformis was 
 had during the early morning and late in the afternoon. Some days 
 the dozers were run as late as twelve o'clock at night with good success. 
 Later than this the grasshoppers, for the most part, become so slug- 
 gish that they will not jump at the approach of the dozer and will be 
 run over and not killed. After going over a field one way, better suc- 
 cess was had by going back over it in the opposite direction. When 
 •grasshoppers keep coming into the alfalfa, it will be necessary to use 
 the dozer every day; but usually, after running over the field two or 
 three times, so large a number will be caught that those left will not do 
 great damage. 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 
 
 17 
 
 Poisoning was not successful in the alfalfa fields. Not enough grass- 
 hoppers were killed to pay for putting out the poison. In such cases 
 the alfalfa foliage is preferred to the poison, and the grasshoppers will 
 scarcely touch the latter. Smoking is even less effective. The grass- 
 hoppers crawl down among the stems of the alfalfa out of the smoke 
 and can scarcely be made to fly. It is likely that enough grasshoppers 
 will be left in the alfalfa fields, even after the dozer has been used, so 
 that if conditions are favorable there will be a good batch of eggs the 
 following spring. Such being the case, some method, such as disking, 
 should be employed to destroy the eggs which are deposited. 
 
 Fig. 12. 
 
 Differential grasshopper (Melanoplus 
 differentialis), young. 
 
 THE CAMPAIGN AT NEWMAN AND LOS BANOS. 
 
 The Differential Grasshopper (Melanoplus differentialis) . — This grass- 
 hopper was practically the only species at Newman that became 
 abundant enough to do serious injury. It actually did, however, 
 the most damage of any species this year. The losses sustained were 
 chiefly due to the fact that 
 nothing was attempted against 
 the pest until late in the sea- 
 son. The country about New- 
 man was a very striking 
 example of the amount of 
 injury that a grasshopper is 
 capable of doing. A very con- 
 servative estimate places the 
 loss due to the work of this 
 grasshopper at $10,000, while 
 some claim that it was not less 
 than $30,000. These estimates are based on the damage to alfalfa alone 
 no consideration being taken of the injury done to small home orchards 
 and vineyards, and other less important crops. (See frontispiece, also 
 Figs. 13 and 14.) When it is understood that this damage was done 
 on an area of from 1,000 to 1,500 acres, the really serious loss to the 
 individual ranchers can be appreciated. 
 
 This grasshopper was for the most part hatched in the alfalfa fields. 
 There had been some slight damage done the previous year, but not 
 enough to cause much apprehension. This year, however, they began 
 to be noticed as damaging alfalfa about the first of June, and they kept 
 at it energetically until the middle of August before they were under 
 satisfactory control. 
 
 There is a striking difference in color between the young grasshop- 
 pers and the adults. This gave rise to the belief that there were at 
 least two different species concerned in the work. The nymph, or 
 young, is bright green in color and changes slightly with each succes- 
 
18 
 
 UNIVERSITY OP CALIFORNIA — EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 sive moult; and suddenly, when becoming adult, changes to a rather 
 light yellow. This subsequently changes gradually with most individ- 
 uals, becoming much darker. 
 
 There was one large brood produced quite early in the summer, but 
 the hatching of some of the eggs was greatly delayed and was very 
 irregular, as young grasshoppers could be seen as late as October. 
 About the middle of July, after a large part of the damage these grass- 
 hoppers are capable of doing had been clone, the University was 
 appealed to; and acting on the advice given, many of the ranchers 
 began the use of hopper dozers. It was not too late to demonstrate that- 
 great good could be accomplished by the use of the dozers. 
 
 In many fields the grasshoppers were so thick that not only were the 
 old leaves and bark trimmed off, but as fast as new growth would start 
 that would be taken also. In a few cases this had been kept up so per- 
 
 Fig. 13. Vineyard defoliated by grasshoppers near Newman. 
 
 sistently that the alfalfa was apparently dead. Usually one could see 
 a very great difference in a week's time, after a field had been run over 
 three or four times with the dozers. In this way one or two cuttings 
 were obtained from fields which would not have yielded anything had 
 the grasshoppers been left alone, and the alfalfa revived enough to be 
 in good condition to be pastured during the fall. This species, how- 
 ever, is much more easily caught in the dozer than the species occurring 
 at Turlock. It is of a more sluggish nature and will not fly to as great 
 an extent. More of the grasshoppers would be run over by the dozer 
 than would get over the top of the backstop. 
 
 Poison was not tried on this species, because the only places where it 
 could have been used were the small orchards adjoining the ranch 
 buildings, where there was considerable danger of stock getting hold of 
 either the bait or the grasshoppers after they had eaten poison. There 
 is no reason why the poisoned bran would not work very successfully 
 with this species, as it is a voracious feeder. 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 
 
 19 
 
 Smoking was tried, but with poor success. The grasshoppers would 
 stir around a little when the smoke first struck them, but after becoming 
 accustomed to it would pay no attention whatever to it. Burning 
 would have been a very good way of getting rid of large numbers of 
 the grasshoppers, but this could not be done at Newman. 
 
 This same grasshopper was also common at Los Banos, although on 
 the whole nowhere near as much damage was done. They were not 
 confined to one section, but were scattered over quite a considerable 
 territory, only in an occasional field being numerous enough to do 
 extensive injury. In some of these places even more serious damage 
 
 Fig. 14. Orchard trees from which leaves and fruit had been removed by 
 grasshoppers. Pits shown still on the tree. 
 
 was done than at Newman. On one ranch not only was the crop of 
 alfalfa for the year lost, but the trees around the house were stripped, 
 many being killed. Even olive and fig trees were damaged to a con- 
 siderable extent, although these two kinds of trees were in most cases 
 left alone. Practically nothing was done against the grasshoppers. 
 Two different ranchers had some success with crude dozers made out of 
 old wooden troughs. But for the most part it was too late in the season 
 to make it worth while to do anything, after it was learned that some- 
 thing could be done. 
 
 The species was abundant the year before at Dos Palos, doing consid- 
 erable damage there, but this year, with one exception, there was 
 
20 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA— EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 scarcely any injury. This exception was on one of the Miller & Lux 
 ranches, where a small vineyard had been stripped of its leaves and the 
 fruit consequently ruined. A few trees of an adjoining orchard had 
 also been considerably injured. Grasshoppers were quite common in 
 other places, but not enough so to do any noticeable injury. 
 
 Egg-laying. — The egg-laying of Melanoplus differentialis is character- 
 istic of nearly all grasshoppers, and an account of the manner of laying 
 and the nature of the soil chosen will illustrate how the danger of an 
 infestation the following year can be diminished. 
 
 Pairing was noticed from the time the grasshoppers reached maturity 
 in June. Eggs large enough to lay were found, on dissection, during; 
 
 Fig. 15. Alfalfa field near Newman with leaves removed by grasshoppers. 
 Lower parts of poplar trees seen in the background also defoliated by 
 these insects. 
 
 early July, but no grasshoppers were at this time caught in the act of 
 egg-laying, although there must have been some laying done. None 
 were found laying before active field observations were discontinued, 
 about the middle of August, but during the first week in October eggs 
 were being laid by thousands. 
 
 The insect chooses a place in the alfalfa field where vegetation is not 
 too thick. Bare ditch banks or levees are very suitable places. The 
 roadside and other bare spots are also acceptable, but more seemed to 
 be laying in the alfalfa than in other places. In some cases ground was 
 chosen that was so hard a knife blade could scarcely be forced into it, 
 but much softer soil was more usual. 
 
 On finding an acceptable spot the insect drills a hole from an inch to 
 an inch and a half long, by means of the four horn-like points on the 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 
 
 21 
 
 extreme tip of the abdomen. This hole, as a rule, is not put straight 
 into the ground, but at an angle. About seventy-five were dug up, and 
 their relation to the position of the head of the insect noted. Of the 
 seventy-five only three or four were burrowed straight into the ground. 
 Only one was found where the curve or angle was toward the head, the 
 position so commonly figured in grasshopper publications. All the 
 remainder had a decided backward tilt. 
 
 As soon as the hole is drilled deep enough so that nearly the entire 
 abdomen is buried, the grasshopper ejects a small amount of a frothy 
 substance into the bottom, and then begins to place the eggs. The 
 
 Fig. 16. Poplar trees defoliated by grasshoppers. 
 
 species does not seem to have a regular manner of placing the eggs; they 
 seem to be in a more heterogeneous mass than is the case with most 
 other species. As soon as enough eggs are laid to fill up as far as the 
 frothy substance reaches, more of that is ejected into the hole. Then 
 more eggs are placed, and so on until the hole is filled within half an 
 inch, or less, of the top. Most of this is filled with this same frothy 
 substance. Then, with the end of the abdomen, the grasshopper moves 
 small pieces of dirt around, using the drill as pincers or claspers, until 
 the hole is entirely concealed; then she walks away. 
 
 During the hot part of the day not less than two hours were taken to 
 drill the hole and deposit the eggs. All the eggs that have reached full 
 development are placed in the one hole. These in one case numbered 93. 
 
22 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA— EXPERIMENT STATION. 
 
 Usually, however, there are considerably less, averaging from 60 to 70. 
 Other layings of eggs are probably deposited later, as an insect killed 
 just after finishing egg-laying would show that the next lot of eggs in 
 the oviduct were a quarter or even a third developed. 
 
 The frothy substance with which the hole is lined turns in a few hours 
 into a hard, cement-like substance that seems to be nearly waterproof. 
 The eggs are thus in what is practically a waterproof capsule. Ordinary 
 wettings will not affect it, but prolonged soakings may tend to kill 
 the eggs. 
 
 These eggs stay in the capsule, gradually coming to maturity and 
 giving up the young grasshoppers with the warm days of spring or sum- 
 mer. As long as the egg capsule remains in an unbroken condition the 
 eggs are pretty well protected; but if by some means it can be broken, 
 there is a good possibility of the eggs being destroyed during the winter. 
 
 Fig. 17. Wild gourd attacked on one side by migrating swarm of grasshoppers. 
 
 In certain experiments in Kansas a number of years ago, with which 
 the writer was conversant, it was found that the use of circular and 
 cut-away disks was very successful in breaking up these capsules; and 
 it was observed, furthermore, that instead of injuring the alfalfa, the 
 yield of the alfalfa was actually increased, in some cases to the extent 
 of a ton and a half to the acre. This increased yield after disking 
 accords with the experience of many California growers, who regularly 
 disk their fields each fall. The practice is to be particularly recom- 
 mended wherever grasshoppers have deposited eggs. The blades of the 
 disk should be set rather straight, so as not to tear out the crown of the 
 alfalfa root. The ground can be gone over twice, so as to checkerboard 
 the entire field. In the portion of the field next to the fence, where grass- 
 hoppers often lay large quantities of eggs, the disks should be run twice 
 in opposite directions, and almost as good results can be obtained as by 
 crossing. For a hard soil, the cut-away disk is the better; in ordinary 
 loose soil, the circular is equally as satisfactory. 
 
STUDIES IN GRASSHOPPER CONTROL. 23 
 
 RESUME. 
 
 This bulletin records the experience of a successful campaign for the 
 practical control of grasshoppers. Brief accounts are given of the 
 " long-legged grasshopper," the "pale-winged grasshopper," the "devas- 
 tating grasshopper," Hesperotettix sp., and more detailed data con- 
 cerning the two most distinctive forms. The " valley grasshopper" was 
 destroyed quite effectively by burning; and, where this was not prac- 
 tical or efficient, by the use of poison in orchards and vineyards 
 and by the use of the hopper dozer in alfalfa fields. The method of 
 constructing a dozer is given, and suggestions as to its use. The 
 "differential grasshopper" of the Newman district was found easily 
 controllable by the use of the dozer; and no other methods seemed 
 desirable under the conditions obtaining there, except the use of the 
 disk in fields stocked with eggs. 
 
CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION. 
 
 REPORTS. 
 
 1896. Report of the Viticultural Work during the seasons 1887-93, with data 
 
 regarding the Vintages of 1894-95. 
 3897. Resistant Vines, their Selection, Adaptation, and Grafting. Appendix to 
 
 Viticultural Report for 1896. 
 1898. Partial Report of Work of Agricultural Experiment Station for the years 
 
 1895-96 and 1896-97. 
 1900. Report of the Agricultural Experiment Station for the year 1897-98. 
 
 1902. Report of the Agricultural Experiment Station for 1898-1901. 
 
 1903. Report of the Agricultural Experiment Station for 1901-1903. 
 
 1904. Twenty-second Report of the Agricultural Experiment Station for 1903-1904. 
 
 BULLETINS. 
 
 Endurance of Drought in Soils of the Arid Region. 
 
 Report of the Condition of Olive Culture in California. 
 
 The Phylloxera of the Vine. 
 
 Feeding of Farm Animals. 
 
 Tolerance of Alkali by Various Cultures. 
 
 The Potato- Worm in California. 
 
 Pickling Ripe and Green Olives. 
 
 Citrus Fruit Culture. 
 
 Orange and Lemon Rot. 
 
 Lands of the Colorado Delta in Salton Basin, and Supplement. 
 
 Deciduous Fruits at Paso Robles. 
 
 Grasshoppers in California. 
 
 California Peach-Tree Borer. 
 
 The Peach-Worm. 
 
 The Red Spider of Citrus Trees. 
 
 New Methods of Grafting and Budding Vines. 
 
 Culture Work of the Substations. 
 
 Resistant Vines and their Hybrids. 
 
 California Sugar Industry. 
 
 The Value of Oak Leaves for Forage. 
 
 Arsenical Insecticides. 
 
 Fumigation Dosage. 
 
 Spraying with Distillates. 
 
 Sulfur Sprays for Red Spider. 
 
 Directions for Spraying for the Codling-Moth. 
 
 Fowl Cholera. 
 
 Commercial Fertilizers. 
 
 California Olive Oil ; its Manufacture. 
 
 Contribution to the Study of Fermentation. 
 
 The Hop Aphis. 
 
 Tuberculosis in Fowls. 
 
 Commercial Fertilizers. 
 
 Pear Scab. 
 
 Poultry Feeding and Proprietary Foods. 
 
 Asparagus and Asparagus Rust in California. 
 
 Spraying for Scale Insects. 
 
 Manufacture of Dry Wines in Hot Countries. 
 
 Observations on Some Vine Diseases in Sonoma County. „ 
 
 Tolerance of the Sugar Beet for Alkali. 
 
 % 
 
 CIRCULARS. 
 
 No. 1. Texas Fever. No. 10. Reading Course in Economic 
 
 2. Blackleg. Entomology. 
 
 3. Hog Cholera. 11. Fumigation Practice. 
 
 4. Anthrax. 12. Silk Culture. 
 
 5. Contagious Abortion in Cows. 13. The Culture of the Sugar Beet. 
 7. Remedies for Insects. 14. Practical Suggestions for Cod- 
 9. Asparagus Rust. ling-Moth Control in the 
 
 Pajaro Valley. 
 
 Copies may be had by application to the Director of the Experiment 
 Station, Berkeley, California. 
 
 I