A A 9 9 4 5 6 5 cT the causes" V"Vi1 ':»h ^^f'^^ted the THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES BRIEF INVESTIGATION or THE CAUSES WHICH CREATED THE L.ATE CONTROVERSY ELECTION OF MAYOR. BY A DEMOCRATIC MEMBER OF THE COMMON COUNCIL. LET ME EXHORT AND CONJURE YOU NEVER TO SUFFER AN INVA- SION OF YOUR POLITICAL CONSTITUTION, HOWEVER MINUTE THE INSTANCE MAY APPEAR, TO PASS BY WITHOUT A DETERMINED PERSEVERING RESISTANCE." JUNIUS, 1830. ^iSii^^555?- LANSING COLLECTION 1 \830 BRIEF INVESTIGATION, &c. TO THE Republican Electors of the City of New- York. As the Republican General Committee have volunteered a denunciation of those members of the Common Council who were opposed to the re-election of Walter Bowne, Esq. and as the Courier and Eiiquirer has deemed it expedient to echo the malediction, it is due to the consistent, undeviating, and honest members of the Party, to be informed of the causes which produced this unpleasant controversy. If in the course of this investigation, I shall conclusively fasten on the friends of Mr. Bowne, the charge of deviating from the usages and principles of the Republican party, and exhibit them as merely united together by the ties of individ- ual interest and private advancement, guided by no promi- nent landmarks of party discipline, but yielding solely to the influence of personal preference ; I trust that you will be convinced, that in endeavoring to sustetin them, the General Committee have not only deviated from their proper sphere, ^ but have attempted to force the current of public opinion u from its legitimate channel, and make its course subservient - to the designing views of interested politicians. It is understood \hdXjive members of that body were oppo- sed to the resolutions promulgated by the General Commit- tee, and before the expiration of the present year, I am of opinion lliatall will be fully convinced of the impropriety of courting the hostility of a majority of the people of this city, by denouncing their representatives in tlic City Council. While the great body of the Republican party, bow with due submission to the proper edicts of their representatives in Ge- neral Committee, they have sufficient independence to resist, the encroachments of arbitrary power, and repel the male- dictions of unauthorized proscription. If the Kepublican members who are denounced by the Ge- neral Committee, have strictly adhered to the known usages of the party, and if their conduct has comported with its prin- ciples and discipline, I can conceive of no excuse for those who have endeavored to shield the deserters from its land- marks, with the iEgis of their official approbation. When it is recollected that Mr. Bowne endeavored at the last Election, by his decision as Chairman of the General Meeting at Tammany Hall, to force three individuals on the party who were obnoxious to a majority of its members — that he has recommended one of those persons for the responsible station of Bank Commissioner ; and when another of those very individuals was the author and presenter of the sweep- ing resolutions which were adopted in General Committee, it cannot be uncharitable to conclude that Mr. Bowne was personally concerned in this political anathema, and that in this instance private prejudice took precedence of public good. Educated in the school of democracy, and attached to its principles by every tie of feeling, and every association of friendship, 1 cannot but deprecate every attempt to destroy its influence, and impair its unity. It is a source of regret that individuals have crept into our ranks, and attained stations of high importance, who having origmally been associated with our opponents, and whose views in joining the dominant party, being merely selfish, have substituted personal advancement for purity of purpose, and in their anxiety for men, have abandoned j^mczp/e. For myself, I do not contemplate the sacrifice of any known principle of the party, to gratify either the empty pre- tensions of boisterous converts, or the selfish clamors of de- signing partizans. Great eftbrts have been made to identify the success of Mr. Bowne, with the triumph of Republican principles, but I shall in my next number unfold the machinery which placed him in the chair of office ; and am mistaken in your intelligence and purity, if your decision is not in accordance with my own. I am aware that a majority of the people of this city will consider this exposition as unnecessary, but am unwilling that the views that governed the majority of your representa- tives, should depend solely on the evanescent record of oral information. A democratic member of the Common Council. TO THE Republican Electors of the City of New- York. NO. 3. Having in my first number, considered the prescriptive resolutions of the General Committee, I will now proceed to unfold the means which were resorted to by the friends of Mr. Bowne, to secure his re-election. In the early part of the month of December last, General Arcularius and Assistant Alderman Jeremiah, issued no- tices, which were severally delivered to the Repubhcan members of the Common Council, convening a Caucus at the Old Alms House. This notice was in the usual form, and in the following words, viz. " New-York, Dec, '2d, 1829. " Sir, '' You are requested to attend a meeting of the Re- publican members of the Common Council elect, on Fri- day evening the 5th inst. at the Old Alms House. « HENRY ARCULARIUS, " THOMAS JEREMIAH." This call was made in strict accordance with the prece- dent established last season, by the present leading friends of Mr. Bowne, both as to the time and place, and the indi- viduals invited. Tiiat this assertion may be fully established, I will name the persons who were called to this Caucus, viz. The Recorder — Messrs. Nevius and Roosevelt, of the 1st Ward— Messrs. Brown and Bryson, of the 4th — Mr. Arcu- ralius, of the 5th (Alderman Rogers being absent) — Messrs. Strong and Townsend, of the 6th — Messrs. Seaman and Scott, of the 7th— Messrs. Brown and Bedell, of the 8th — Messrs. Wells and Rogers, of the 9th— Messrs. Meserole and Jeremiah, of the 10th— Messrs. Marsh and Dibblee, of the 1 1 th — iMessrs. Lee and Cooper, of the 1 2th — Messrs. Palmer and Lovett, of the 13lh — and Messrs. Woodruff and Engs, of the 14th. As it has been asserted by the friends of Mr. Bowne, that the above call was " illegal and unauthorized," it will be pro- per to revert to the last year's Caucus, which was called by Alderman Lozier, at the instance of the Recorder and a few leading friends of Mr. Bowne, without consulting a large majority of the Republican members who were invited. The invitation of Alderman Lozier was extended to the fol- lowing Republican members, viz : The Recorder — Messrs. Cebra and Roosevelt, of the 1st Ward — Messrs. Brown and Bryson, of the 4th — Messrs. Rogers and Arcularius, of the 5th — Messrs. Lozier and Strong, of the 6th — Messrs. Coe and Seaman, of the 7th — Messrs. Brown and Cowan, of the 8th — Messrs. Peters and Wells, of the 9th — Messrs. Mese- role and Jeremiah, of the 10th — Messrs. Dodge and Pinck- ney, of the 11th — Messrs. Lee and Cooper, of the 12th — Messrs. Palmer and Lovett, of the 13th— and Messrs. Woodruff and Engs, of the 14th. It will thus be perceived, that the same principle governed the selection for both Caucuses. If it be urged, that the exclusive few who dictated the last year's Caucus were not consulted, the same objection might have been raised by a large majority of the Republican mem- bers the last year, who were not honored with a consulta- tion. The RepubUcan members who gave the invitation the present season, possess as pure Republican principles, and have exhibited as great fidelity and devotedness to the party as Alderman Lozier.) and I presume the fact will not be questioned, that they possess at least equal claims to capa- city and intelligence. These gentlemen had prepared a statement to submit to the meeting, detailing the reasons which governed thorn in this measure, and being both the regularly nominated democratic representatives of the party, they could not anticipate any reasonable objections to as- semble at their call. On the morning of the 5th December, the day at which the first Caucus was called for seven o'clock in the evening, rumors were afloat, that the friends of Mr. Bowne, to the number of twelve, had met the previous evening at the house of the Recorder ; and fearing the success of their favorite can- didate, had deemed it expedient to call a partial Caucus at the Street Commissioner's Office at five o'clock — two hours previous to the general call. For myself, I had serious doubts of the truth of these state- ments ; more especially, as the Recorder had previously of- fered a proper and religious resolution in Common Council, calling on all good citizens to abstain from their usual avo- cations, and recommending them seriously to comply with the request of the Governor, in paying all due respect to this day, specially set apart hi' prayer and tha?ihgiving. That he should manifestly violate his own resolution, by assembling his political friends at his house, o?i this day, to devise schemes of disorganization, seemed totally at vari- ance with probability. The people of this city having by an overwhelming ma- jority, deprecated his interference in our municipal govern- ment, was an additional reason, which made me hesitate to believe in his making this improper attempt to disfranchise a portion of the Republican representatives of the people. The vote in the Convention, which formed the new Char- ter, to exclude the Recorder from being hereafter a mem- ber of the Common Council, or to participate in its mea- sures, was almost unanimous. This fact speaks volumes, in relation to the improjiricty of this corrupt interference on his part. Yet such was the fact. At the appointed hour, sixteen persons assembled at the Street Commissioner's Office, when after the secession of one of their number, who was not disposed to disfranchise his Republican brethren, they entered into a resolution, not only to support Mr. Bowne for the office of Mayor, but de- legated TO THEMSELVES THE POWER TO CONFER ALL THE AP- POINTMENTS IN THE GIFT OF THE COMMON COUNCIL UP TO THE YEAR 1831. It is due to one of those gentlemen, however, to state, that he opposed the sweeping resolution above alluded to, and the next morning gave honorable notice of his determination to abandon their self-constituted and interested combination. If in reverting to the course which was pursued by the friends of the Mayor, we even assume the position, that the gentlemen who called the first meeting were not duly autho- rized, what good reasons can be adduced, for their refusal to extend their invitation to those Republicans of known fide- lity, with whom they had associated during the past year, and who, after an invitation to their deliberations, had ex- hibited a faithful adherence to their Caucus pledges, in all the various appointments to office ? If these gentlemen pretend that they have been governed by the principle of admitting those only who were regularly nominated^ why, I would ask, was Aldermen Palmer, Mr. Jeremiah, General Arcularius, and other regularly nominated members excluded, while Mr. Lovett, Alderman Marsh (who refused to attend) and others, not regularly nominated representatives of the party, were invited ? Or z/'the invitation was intended solely for the Republican representatives, who were considered consistent and faithful members of the party, why was Mr. Roosevelt and other Federalists received, while Alderman Strong, Mr. Town- send, Mr. Dibblee, General Arcularius, Mr. Jeremiah, and other ^rm Republicans^ were expatriated ? Tiie conclusion is irresistible, that both in their refusal to attend the Jirst Caucus, and in their partial selection for the secojid, the friends of Mr. Bownc did not hesitate to repudi- ate tliosc rules which they had prescribed the last season, as Well as the usages which have ever governed the party ; and in their adherence to incn, prostrated those barriers, which have been considered sacred by all consistent Republicans. At the hour designated for the general Caucus, the Re- publican representatives, who ^^ ere disfranchised by the friends of the Mayor, or who did not desire to assist in their interested measures, assembled at the Old Alms House, and after a short deliberation, adjourned to a future day, to de- vise measures for sustaining their rights and privileges. A democratic member ufchc CuiiiiiLuiv CuuuciL TO THE Republican Electors of the City of New- York. NO. 3. Having conclusively established the fact in my last num- ber, that the friends of Mr. Bowne, in the commencement of their operations, refused to recognize the known princi- ples and usages of the Republican party, and their own pre- cedent, 1 shall now proceed to the consideration of the course pursued by the disfranchised members, after being so uncere- moniously driven from all participation in appointments to office, during their term of service. At their first meeting, the members who assembled at the Old Alms House, deemed it expedient to call another meet- ing in a few days, with the expectation that the gentlemen who met at the Street Commissioners Office, after having time for deliberation, would perceive the impropriety of their course, and offer to their Republican associates, that share in their deliberations, which was their legitimate right. 10 Being disappoiuleJ in this reasonable expectation, they met pursuant to adjournment, and agreed to take all fair and honorable means to sustain the rights delegated to ihcm by their constituents; as they were left no alternative, but either a tame submission to unauthorized usurpation, or unqualified resistance. In adopting the latter course, they were of opinion, that while as individual members of the party, they might relin- quish their personal rights, yet holding the responsible station of the representatives of the rights and privileges of their con- stituents, they would have forfeited all claims to public confi- dence, if they had tacitly submitted to the assumption " of an irregular and illegal combination," created in defiance of the usages of the party, and bound together solely by the ties of personal mterest. The Republican members who assembled at this meeting were — Alderman Nevius — Brown, 4th — Strong — Marsh and Palmer — Messrs. Arcularius — Townsend — J eremiah — Dib- blee and Engs ; and at a subsequent meeting, it v^as deemed expedient to invite the representatives of the 2d and 3d wards ; when it was expressly stated by a majority of the Republi- can members, that having originally associated together in conformity with the usages of the party, they could not consent to compromise their principles in \\}e selection of a candidate for the Mayoralty, and that no other than a de- cided Republican should receive their support. The gentlemen from the 2d and 3d wards, with a magna- nimity which exhibits a striking contrast to the interested course of the Assistant Alderman of the first ward, and other Federal friends of Mr. Bowne, consented to u aive their per- sonal preferences, and unite in support of the candidate of the majority. In accordance w ith these views, the members opposed to Mr. Bowne, nominated Mr. Thomas B. Smith, as their can- didate for Mayor ; and no other pledge was demanded, than if any member should change his views, he should give no- tice of the same to his associates. 11 While I am disposed to render ample justice to JVlr. Bowne, for his political consistency since he has joined the ranks of the Republican party, it will not he considered in- vidious to remark, that Mr. Smith, was a firm and undevi- ating Republican^ while Mr. Bowne was an uncompromising Federalist ; and that whatever may have been the claims of JNIr. Bowne on the party, since his conversion, he has been amply rewarded by his elevation to some of the most impor- tant offices in the gift of the people of this State. The friends of Mr. Smithy therefore, on party considera- tions, have equal, if not paramount claims, on the confidence of their Republican fellow citizens. In the frequent deliberations of the disfranchised members, it will not be improper to state, that it was distinctly under- stood and agreed, that in the event of success, no attempts should be made to remove the friends of the Bowne party from ofiicc ; but that if they were in the majority, they would not imitate their opponents in their proscriptive course. In speaking of the merits of the rival candidates for the Mayoralty, it may be proper to remark, that it is a fact with- in the knowledge of every citizen who has visited the Com- mon Council during their meetings the past year, that Mr. Bowne has exhibited a manifest lack of capacity and deci- sion, as President of the Board. Some of his present leading friends have borne frequent tes- timony to his total unfitness. An attempt has been made by the friends of Mr. Bowne, to fasten on their Republican opponents, the charge of a cor- rupt coalition with the Federal members of the Board. Satisfied of their utter inability, to give even a shadow of apology for their open abandonment of the usages and prin- ciples of the party, these gentlemen have endeavored to drown the indignant voice of their Republican fellow citi- zens, by raising the hue and cry of Federal influence. While the apologists of Mr. Bowne and his friends are dwelling with such manifest emphasis on Federal men and Federal measures, it will be proper to notice the fact, ^-iat these exclusive Republicans have not hesitated to make over- J0. tures to some ol these name Federal gentlemeu, to induce them to join their ranks ; and in their zeal to create prose- lytes, have resorted to concentrated and organized efforts, to shake the constancy of those whom tliey supposed accessi- ble to conversion. The firmness and decision exhibited by the opponents of Mr. Bowne, stands in bold relief, when contrasted with a portion of his Federal friends, who onli/ opened their eyes to the incorrectness of their political course, when in full con- tact with the loaves nndjis/ies of office. A democratic member of the Common CounciL TO THE Republican Electors of the City of New- York. NO. 4. Having in my previous communications disclosed the ori- gin of the Bowne Caucus, and exhibited their claims on the Republican party, I shall now change the scene to the Com- mon Council Chamber on the 28th December, when the new Board was organized. Although at the different meetings which were held by the disfranchised members, it was understood that the friends of the Mayor had promulgated his intention by voting on the ballot for Mayor, to elect himself to office ; yet it was suppo- sed that in this community, which has ever manifested a laud- able jealousy of self-constituted and self-appointed power; no such attempt could be reasonably anticipated. While a portion of the members honestly doubted whether this course might not be pursued, it w as determined to offer an amendment to the resolution to proceed to ballot ; which by testing the Mayor's decision, would resolve doubt into cer- tainty, by compelling him to vote for or against the resolution. An amendment was accordingly submitted in the following vvoi^s: 13 '• But whereas, Walter Bowne, Esq. the present Mayor, is a candidate for tlie office of Mayor at the present election, and thereby interested in the question: — hik\ whereas, the 1 3i\\ rule of this Board declares that 7W member shall vote on a ques- tion in irhich he is interested : — and whereas, it is necessary for the free discussion of the qualifications of the candidates, that they should not be present : — therefore Resolved, that his lie- nor the Mayor be requested to vacate his seat, and that the Recorder preside during the election." His decision on this amendment exceeded even the antici- pations of his most determined opponents ; for refusing to put the question on tiie amendment, he in violation of an absolute rule of the Board, which has ever been held sacred in all de- liberate assemblies, prostrated the invaluable right of amend- ing a motion, until by the main question being decided, the amendment was placed beyond i!ie pale of consideration. This decision was a melancholy evidence of the correct- ness of the statements made by the friends of Mr. Bowne, that he intended to vote for himself; for in quashing the amend- ment, he not only proceeded in direct opposition to the rule governing amendments, but openly violated the 13th rule of the Board, which deprives a member of voting on a question in which he is personally interested. In Clarhe'^s abridgement o{ Jeffersonh excellent Manual, it will be perceived that both of the above rules are considered of vital importance •, and that they are based on the immuta- ble principles of propriety and justice. In this standard work, page 146, speaking of the rule go- verning amendments, Mr. Jefferson observes : '' If an amend- ment be proposed inconsistent with one already agreed to, it is a fit ground for rejection by the house, but not within the competence of the speaker to suppress, as if it were against order,'''* " For were he permitted to bring questions of consistence within the vortex of order, he might usurp a negative on im- portant modifications, and suppress instead of subserving the legislative will." M Again, "ainendmeiifs may be made so as totally to alter the nature of the proposition." On the question o{ personal interest he justly remarks, page ] 14 and 1 1.5 ; "where the private interests of a member are concerned in a bill or question, he is to withdraw ; and where such an interest has appeared, his voice has been disallowed even after a division. In a case 50 contrary not only to the laics of decency, but to the fundGinenial principle of the social compact, ivhich denies to any nan to he a judge in his own cause, it is for the honor of the house, that this rule of immemorial observance, should he strictly adhered to." But the arbitrary measures of the Mayor did not conclude here, for after giving the casting vote to proceed into the elec- tion, and after declaring in the most explicit lerms, " that he had a right to vote on all questions, and that no vote of the Com- mon Council should deprive him of that right,'''' he totally refu- sed to notice a motion for re-consideration, although in a like instance in the early part of the last season, he had positively decided in favor of being bound by the motion to re-consider. Under this state of things, during the pendency of a motion to adjourn, iha seven Assistants being firmly convinced of his intention to elect himself, according to previous arrangement made at a meeting of the opponents of Mr. Bowne, vacated. their seats ; and by destroying a quorum, prevented the intend- ed prostration of principle and propriety. By the following minutes of the meetings of the Common Council, it will be perceived that his predecessors have ever vacated their seats during the election for Mayor, while they were candidates ; and that Mr. Bowne had not even the sha- dow of precedent for his determination to preside during the ballot for his re-election. "January 26, 1823." '• Alderman Zabriskie moved that the Board now proceed to the election of Mayor, which was carried in the affirma- tive. Mr. Allen, the present Mayor, then left the chair, which was taken by the Recorder, Mr. Riker." "January 17, 1825." " Alderman Mann, agreeably to notice of last meeting, moved that the Board now proceed to the election of Mayor 15 for the ensuing year, which was carried in the affirmative. His honor the Mayor, Mr. Paulding, requested that he might be permitted to leave the chair, which was agreed to; and he accordingly retired from the Common Council Chamber." "Januarys, 1826." " The Mayor, Mr. Paulding, then observed, that with the permission of the Board he would leave the chair, which he accordingly did ; and it was taken by the Recorder, Mr. Riker." "December 25, 182G." " Alderman Taylor's motion to proceed to the choice of a Mayor, was then taken into consideration — 1 3 affirmative — 12 negative. A member observed that as there were 26 members present, 1 3 was not a majority, and he considered the Board as entitled to ask the Mayor to vote. The May- or (Mr. Hone) stated that he felt himself so situated on the occasion, that he begged the Board would excuse him from vo- ting. The Board having assented thereto, he then declared the question carried, and requested the members to prepare their ballots." "December 27, 1827." " Alderman Ostrander moved that the board now proceed to the election of a Mayor for the ensuing year, which was agreed to. The Mayor, Mr. Paulding, requested to be per- mitted to leave the chair and retire, which was assented to. The Recorder, Mr. Riker then took the chair." " December 29, 1828." " The Mayor, Mr. Paulding, then observed, that on a for- mer occasion, when his name was mentioned as a candidate for the office of M ayor, he had requested permission to leave the chair ; but as at this time he was not a candidate for that office, he would do himself the honor of presiding at the elec- tion." It has been asserted in the public prints, that Mr. Bown« never intended to vote for himself; but if any injustice has been awarded him in the imputation, it will find an excuse in his conduct during the different votes on this subject, inde- pendent of the assertions of his friends, that such was his intention. For niyscdf, iiis refusal to alKlicatc his seal ; liis declarations in the Board ; his votes on the question of interest ; and the fact that he refused to make the explanation which he was subsequently compelled to, in his letter to the seven Assist- ants ; are in my mind, the most conclusive proofs of his origi- nal intentions. A democratic member of the Common Council. TO THE Republican Electors of the City of New- York. NO. 5. It is a maxim which has received the sanction of succeed- ing ages, that excessive desire for power and distinction can- not remain long concealed from observation ; and that, al- though the accomplished politician may be an adept in those arts of refined deception, which bid defiance to common scru- tiny; yet like the heel of the fabled Achilles, he is here found vulnerable. This axiom was manifestly exemplified in the case of Mr. Bowne and his friends, in the Common Council Chamber, after the departure of the seven Assistants. His honor the Maijor, trembled with rage and disappoint- ment — the wily and courteous Recorder exhibited a degree of passion which his uniform caution seldom admits — the Federal Assistant from the First was absolutely unmanagea- ble ; and even the sweet-tempered Aldermen from the 1th and 12///, evidently lost their usual equilibrium. The Mayor in the ardor of his desire for the public good, (i. e. his own re-election) dispatched that able negociator Hays, to beseech the absentees to return ; and when it was found that these gentlemen had adjourned to Bellevue, to dinner, he courteously proposed a recess until 5 o'clock, that these obstinate deserters might, by quieting the demands of hunger, feel more favorably disposed to further his preten- sions. 17 Finding his condescension unavailing, after pemiitting the Recorder, the federal gentleman of the First, and others, to abuse these gentlemen informally, in their absence, he reluc- tantly adjourned the Board (notwithstanding his previous as- sertion that they must sit till dooms-day if a quorum was not formed) until the ensuing day at 1 o'clock. The next morning orders were issued to the various depen- dants of the Bowne party, to swell llie clamor of denuncia- tion against the Assistants ; and accordingly the hue and cry was raised, and every whipper-in echoed the sound. It was most learnedly concluded that the Republic was in danger, and that in the downfall of Mr. Bowne, there would be a total shipwreck of Republican principles. The hour of meeting arrived, and notwithstanding the din of preparation, the seven Assistants were still absent. During an explanation, by the friends of these gentlemen, of the reasons which governed them in their absence, shouts of applause resounded from the assemblage of spectators ; and it was evident that the popular voice failed to sustain the Mayor's pretensions. So convinced was Mr. Bowne of this, that after adjourn- ing the Board to the next day, it was deemed expedient on reflection, io further adjourn to a more distant period. During the vacation, the seven Assistants addressed a let- ter to the Mayor, explaining the causes of their absence, and desiring of him the information whether it was his intention to preside, and vote for himself. In his answer he admits that the public good (i. e. pubtic sentiment) demands the avowal of his determination to not vote for himself; and accordingly at the ensuing meeting of tlie Board, they attended at the tea room for the purpose of assisting in the deliberations of the Council ; when during a request from Alderman Strong, that their letter and the Mayor's answer might be read, Mr. Bowne unceremonious- ly adjourned the meeting, without giving the Assistants time to appear in the Council Chamber, in obedience to his re- quest transmitted by the High Constable. c 18 This abrupt adjournment was deemed a breach of the or- dinary rules of politeness, being made while the seven As- sistants were on their way to the Board, in obedience to the Mayor's request. The long wished for consummation of the Mayor's hopes approximated, however, too near fruition, to be long delay- ed ; and accordingly, on the second day after the preceding meeting, he again assembled the Board, and on the first bal- lot, Mr. Bowne announced that he had received^f/Zeen votes, and therefore declared himself duly elected to the office of A'layor for the ensuing year; and immediately adjourned the Board. The Mayor's undue anxiety for office, and want of deco- rum, was fully exhibited in his conduct at this election ; for he not only announced his own elevation, but in his extreme haste to grasp the reins of power, refused even to delay for the tellers to declare the result. His conduct in the early part of this meeting, by his arbi- trary decisions on every motion which was offered by his opponents, declaring every thing which did not tally with his views out of order, and refusing to hear any remarks from the disfranchised members, was in perfect keeping with the uniform tenor of his career. The result oiihc first ballot was certainly a shock to the friends of Mr. Smith, for they justly considered a breach of faith on the part of one of their number, when no pledge was demanded, except the annunciation of any individual mem- ber to his associates, if he changed his views, as in the high- est degree disingenuous and dishonorable. The additional {