I 
 
 I 
 
 a4s 
 
 •6 
 
 11^ 
 
 1^ 
 
BANCROFT 
 LIBRARY 
 
 THE LIBRARY 
 
 OF 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY 
 
 OF CALIFORNIA 
 
Digitized by the Internet Archive 
 
 in 2007 with funding from 
 
 IVIicrosoft Corporation 
 
 http://www.archive.org/details/assemblymemorialOOnevarich 
 
ASSEMBLY 
 
 MEMORIAL AND JOINT RESOLUTION 
 
 RELATIVE TO THE UNITED STATES MINT 
 AT CARSON CITY. NEVADA. 
 
F S- H i>- 
 ■ ?r 
 
 .M H- 
 

 Assembly Memorial and Joint Resolution. 
 
 RELATIVE TO THE UNITED STATES mNT AT CARSON 
 
 CITY, NEVADA. 
 
 To (he Senate and House of Representalives in Congress Assembled : 
 
 Your memorialists, the Lepjislature of the State of Nevada, respect- 
 fully show that the material interests of this State are suffering on 
 account of unjust and unlawful discriminations that are being enforced 
 against our people by the present Administration's method of con- 
 ducting the affairs of the Treasury Department, having special 
 reference to the closing of Ihe United States Mint at Carson. 
 
 One of the great industries by which the people of Nevada live is 
 mining for silver and gold. Whatever, therefore, burdens, dis- 
 courages or imposes restraints upon mining, hurts us in a vital part. 
 
 The mineral resources of the State are vast almost beyond belief ; 
 no region of the earth excels Nevada in richness and extent. 
 
 From Idaho to Arizona, a distance of more than four hundred 
 miles, from the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the Utah line, the hills 
 are ribbed with ledges bearing precious metals. 
 
 The business of mining is expensive and precarious. The ore 
 must be found, broken down or blasted out, hoisted to the surface, 
 transported to the mills, crushed, the metals extracted, the gold and 
 silver parted, refined and sent to market or minted into coins. 
 
 A vast and permanent outlay of labor and capital is required before 
 return of profit can be hoped for. 
 
 Capital is sensitive ; it avoids precarious investments and unusual 
 risks. A decline in the value of the metals — real or fictitious — an 
 intimation that the mines have failed or the withdrawal of privileges 
 before enjoyed arrests development, depresses industry, and fills us 
 with apprehension and alarm. It is impossible to overestimate the 
 injury to miniiig, produced by the suspension of coinage at the 
 Carson Mint in April, 1885, and the final closing of that institution 
 in November of that year. 
 
 It gave out the intimation that the mines had failed, it discouraged 
 those who had made investments, arrested enterprise that had already 
 begun, and turned away those who were considering the advantages 
 of our situation. It deprived the prospectors and miners of all the 
 extensive region lying between the Rocky and Sierra Nevada 
 
Mountains, of the advantage of a sub-treasury, and of a Mint to part, 
 refine, assay, exchange and pnrchase their silver bullion, and to coin, 
 exchange, or purchase their bars of gold — a loss the more serious 
 and irreparable because there is no other institution nearer than San 
 Francisco to supply the deprivation. 
 
 The bullion output of the region accommodated by the Carson 
 Mint was no greater when the Mint was started in 1869 than when it 
 was closed in 1885. 
 
 Sources of information entirely reliable verify this statement. The 
 tax records in the office of the State Controller show proceeds of 
 mines returned for taxation in 1884 valued at $6,820,912; in 1885 it 
 was $6,847,405, and in 1886 it was $6,585,839. These figures (as 
 those furnished for purposes of taxation usually are) are beheved to 
 be far below the actual value. 
 
 To this amount should be added the product of the great mineral 
 district of Bodie and Inyo county, California, tributary to the Car- 
 son Mint. 
 
 It is absolutely true that the bullion output of the country within 
 a radius of fifteeen miles of Carson is three times as much as could 
 possibly be handled by this Mint, though running at its fullest ca- 
 pacity. 
 
 When the Mint was established as now, mining for the precious 
 metals was of more than mere local consequence. It was of national 
 importance. It furnished the basis of metallic money, prevented the 
 contraction of the currency, arrested the decline of values, strengthened 
 the national credit and stimulated the industries, and promoted the 
 prosperity of the whole country. For these reasons, and to foster 
 mining, the Mint was established. 
 
 The motive that actuated Congress, undoubtedly, was to pro- 
 vide metallic money for the needs of business and to accommodate 
 the inhabitants of the Great Basin with facilities for coining or sell- 
 ing their bullion. 
 
 It cannot be pretended that the object was to make a profit to the 
 Government. For more than sixty years, from 1792 to 1853, coin- 
 age was at the public; expense, and without charge to the citizen. 
 The exaction of charges was for the sole purpose of preventing the 
 exporting and melting of coins when a profit could be realized and 
 recoining them when caprice suggested or temporary necessity 
 required. 
 
 The causes which prompted and the reasons which promoted the 
 creation of the Mint at Carson have not disappeared. They are as 
 cogent and controlling to-day as in 1868, or at any time since the 
 Mint was established. 
 
 The increased demand for silver and gold has, in fact, augmented 
 the importance of mining. 
 
 The bullion output of the countr}^ tributary to the Mint is almost 
 as great as in 1869, and five times greater than the Mint has required 
 during any year of its existence, being, as we have already set forth, 
 three times more than it could possibly convert into fine bars or coin 
 even under the most favorable circumstances. 
 
When the Mint closed its doors there were 258,241 ounces of 
 refined silver and 24,694 ounces of gold ready for coining, and 27,563 
 ounces of unparted gold, and 407,017 ounces of unparted silver 
 ready for treatment. The supply on hand was sufficient to keep the 
 the Mint in operation six months. No valid cause therefore existed 
 for suspending operations. 
 
 However much we complain on account of the closing of the Mint, 
 we feel that still greater wrong is being perpetrated by the manner 
 of conducting it now in vogue. It has been degraded from a Mint to 
 an assay office, and this is done, we verily believe, in order that an 
 excuse may be had for entirely abandoning and dismantling it. 
 
 From the time it was established it has been run at a profit to the 
 Government. 
 
 The total expenses of the Carson Mint for eight years, beginning 
 with the resumption of silver coinage in 1878, were ^1,158,869 91, 
 and the total earnings during the same period, $1,149,693 01, 
 showing a cost in excess of gains of only $9,276 90, due entirely to 
 the suspension of coinage for eleven months in the years 1880, 1881 
 and 1882, the records disclosing that during these years the expenses 
 were $122,289 86 in excess of the gains. 
 
 In the years 1883, 1884 and 1885 the earnings were in excess of 
 the expenses more than $68,284, and in 1885 the profits were $7,147, 
 notwithstanding coinage was suspended in April. 
 
 We do not bring out the fact that the Mint can be operated at a 
 profit to the Government as a special reason for resuming its opera- 
 tions. We do not believe that the Mints, any more than the mails, 
 dockyards, arsenals or courts, were ordained for the purpose of 
 gaining a pecuniary profit to the Government. Such considerations 
 are trifling and puerile when addressed to a great Government, which 
 annually expends hundreds of millions of dollars to better the condi- 
 tion of its citizens. But it is something to the favor of a public 
 institution established to foster a great industry and serve the con- 
 venience of the people, that it has accomplished the object for which 
 it was created, and gained a profit besides. 
 
 But the days for operating this Mint at a profit have gone by. 
 They departed when this institution became an object of discrimina- 
 tion. 
 
 They will not return until a change in the policy of the Treasury 
 Department is eft'ected by laws compelling a just recognition of our 
 rights. 
 
 The first acts of the present Administration were inimical to 
 interests of the Mint and of Nevada, intending, doubtless, to add 
 another argument against the coinage of silver. It was therefore 
 deemed necessary by this hostile Administration that the Mint should 
 be made to show a loss in its operations. Knowing that this could 
 not be accomplished if it were permitted to stand upon an equal 
 footing with other similar institutions, harmful discriminations were 
 enforced jigainst it, not only by the Government, but also by certain 
 transportation companies. This very naturally drove the bulhon 
 
 Ufcr»r- 
 
6 
 
 past the doors of our Mint to the San Francisco Mint, as well as to 
 private assay offices and smelting works. 
 
 Is it marvelous then, that the deposits of bullion at the Carson 
 Mint decreased? The only wonder is that there should have been 
 any deposits whatever. 
 
 The foregoing discloses a bad state of affairs, but that is not the 
 worst of it. Not content with making rules greatly prejudicial to 
 our Mint, the Treasury Department took away from it the only 
 possible means of showing a profit, namely, the right of coinage. 
 
 Our Mint is now merely a second-class assay office, the expenses 
 of which amount to more than $100 a day, while the receipts are 
 merely nominal. 
 
 We respectfully submit that this method of tr^tment is unfair to 
 the Mint at Carson, and destructive of the best interests of the people 
 of the entire State. 
 
 We claim that the Mint has been closed and degraded in defiance 
 of the law of Congress, the Treasury Department having usurped the 
 power of the supreme legislative body of the Nation. 
 
 Wherefore, we respectfully memorialize your Honorable Body to 
 venact statutes that will enforce a proper recognition of the rights of 
 our [leople, and secure to us the privileges guaranteed by the laws 
 of our country. 
 
 Resolved by the Assembly^ the Senate concurring^ That His Excel- 
 lency, the Governor, be requested"* to transmit a printed certified 
 copy of this memorial to each member of the United States Senate 
 and to each Representative in Congress. 
 
 Resolved^ That our Senators and Representative in Congress be 
 earnestly requested to use their best efforts to secure the enforcement 
 of existing laws relating to the United States Mint at Carson, and to 
 procure the passage of others that will give us the relief asked for. 
 
 State of Nevada, ( 
 
 Department of State. ) ' 
 I, John M. Dormer, Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, do hereby certify that 
 the annexed is a true, full and correct copy of the original "Assembly Memorial ai,d 
 Joint Resolution relative to the United States Mint at Carson City, Nevada," on file in my 
 office. 
 
 ^ — ■ — -;)(: In Witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Great Seal 
 i oi?AT I ^^ State. Done at office in Carson City, Nevada, this twenty-ninth day 
 \ ^^^^- \ of January, A. D. 1887. 
 *^. — * JOHN M. DORMER, 
 
 Secretary of State. 
 
I