LB LH CD REESE LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Class SCHOOL-ROOK CLASSICS, XIII. INFANT LIFE TUB SCHOOL BULLETIN PUBLICATIONS. The School Eoom Classics. Under the above title we have published a series of Monographs upon Education, as follows, all 16mo, in paper, at 15 cts. each. 1. Unconscious Tuition. By Bishop HUNTINGTON. Pp. 45. " There is probably nothing finer in the whole range of educational lit erature." Ohio Educational Monthly. "It cannot be read without a wholesome self- weighing, and a yearning which develops true character," The Schoolmaster ; Chicago & The Art of Questioning. By J. G. FITCH. Pp. 36. "Mr. Fitch is happily inside his subject, and as clear as a bell." Chris- tian Register. 3. The Philosophy of School Discipline. By JOHN KENNEDY. Pp 23. "Clear and logical, and goes down to the very foundation." Utica, Herald. L The Art of Securing Attention. By J. G. FITCH. Pp. 43. " Perhaps I overestimate Fitch's works, but I fail to find in the state- ment of any other educational writer a juster comprehension of the needs and difficulties of both teacher and pupil, or more common sense put into neater, clearer style." The Student, Philadelphia. 5. Learning and Health. By B. W. RJUHARDSON. Pp. 39. "A timely topic ably treated. "^Y. E. Journal of Education. " Certainly worth many times its weight in gold." Eclectic Teacher. 6. The Neio Education. By J. M. W. MEIKLEJOHN. Pp. 35. " Absolutely the best summary we have seen of the doctrines of Frcebel in their present development. " JV. Y. School Journal. 7. A Small Tractate of Education. By JOHN MILTON. Pp. 2G. " Far more important in the literature of the subject than the treatise of Locke." Encyclopaedia Brittanica. 8. The School Work-Shop. By Baroness VON MARENHOLZ-BUELOW, trans- lated by Miss BLOW. Pp. 27. "In this treatise the kindergarten view of Industrial Education receives its best exemplification." JV. E. Journal of Education. 9. Sex in Mind and in Education. By HENKY MAUDSLEY. Pp. 42. 44 A masterly treatment of a delicate subject.'-'- N. E. Journal of Edu- cation. 10. Education as Viewed by ThinKers. Pp. 47. This contains 95 classified quotations from leading authorities of every time and country, and will be of use to every writer and speaker. 11. How to Teach Natural Science in Public Schools. By WM. T. HARRIS. Pp. 40. Since this was first published in 1871 for the schools of St. Louis, it has been regarded as the standard authority upon the subject, and this edition, revised by the author, was prepared by the request of the Committee on Physics-Teaching in 1887 of the National Association. C. W. BABI>EE]Sr, Publisher, Syracuse, N. Y. SCHOOL-ROOM CLASSICS. XIII. TIEDEMANE'S Record of Infant-Life, AN ENGLISH VERSION OF THE French Translation and Commentary BERNARD PEREZ, AUTHOR OF THE "FIRST THREE YEARS OF CHILDHOOD," WITH NOTES, BY F. LOUIS SOLD AN, PH.D., PRINCIPAL OF THE NORMAL AND HIGH SCHOOLS, ST. LOI7J8, JttO. SYRACUSE, N. Y. : C. W. BARDEEN, PUBLISHER. 1890. Copyright, 1890, by C. W. BARUKKN. PREFACE. This essay is remarkable both on account of its contents and of the influence which its publication in France has had on the study of Childhood. It is a reproduction of a little work by a German writer, which, I think, was written about 100 years ago, but was completely forgotten until a French translation of it appeared in 1863, in the Journal General de V Instruction Publique, by Mr. Michelan. This translation attracted much attention, and seems to have given the first impulse to a number of most remarkable monographs on the development of Childhood. I am by no means sure about the identification of the original author. The French ver- sion calls him " Thierry Tiedemann," and Egger says that he was a physician (cf. L" 1 Intelligence, etc., cJiez les en/ants, p. 7), but for a number of reasons I am inclined to think that the author is Dietrich Tiedemann, 1748-1803, a professor of philosophy at the German University of Marbury, and that these observations were completely recorded in 1781. If this surmise is correct, the child here described is Friederich Tiedemann, later professor at Heidelberg, and famous as a writer on anatomy and physiology. 189030 Muni's BKorltfliitatLJA. First Month. Beginning with the earli- est days,, Tiedemann observed various move- ments and acts which he attributed to in- stinct and to a predisposition of the organic mechanism. The day after his birth the infant sucked the ringer of his nurse ; yet he never sucked continuously except when something soft tied in a cloth was put in his mouth. The eyes at this early day moved in all directions, but were directed with a preference toward things that were in mo- tion a fact which is more general with new- born infants and even with animals (although they may still be blind) than Tiedemann thinks. The movements of the body to escape the pressure of the swaddling clothes, or to escape pain in general, or to alleviate it through distraction, or to abate local ir- ritation resulting from the accumulation of 6 Perez's Translation of ^ blood in certain places all these movements, useful but uncertain, are accounted for by our philosopher, as we should do ourselves, as being irresistible impulses of the organic mechanism, which resemble intentional ac- tions. Tiedemann, very properly, however, raises the question, whether there is not already mingled with them a personal inten- tion and acquired knowledge. I should answer this question as he does, in the af- firmative, notwithstanding the fact, that in our days the widest scope is allowed for re- flex and unconscious action in the mental phenomena of the adult and still 'more in shild.* It is repugnant to me to think of a child as a mere machine. From my stand-point, * Rousseau, who has well expressed the principle upon which child-psychology should rest, by cautioning us not to seek the man in the child, but to think of what he is before lie becomes man, said that the newly-born infant, fettered by imperfect and but half-developed organs, is a purely sensuous being who has not even the feeling of his own ex- istence and with whom cries and movements are absolute mechanical effects, destitute of knowledge and will. Charles Darwin has collected more exact facts in regard to reflex-action among children, than any other naturalist and psychologist. Among the reflex-actions noticed during the first days he mentions: sneezing, hiccoughing, gaping, Tiedemann's Essay on Infancy. 7 therefore, I can see even in the infant's first day "a beginning of instruction." I take exception, however, to the circumstances which seemed to Tiedemann to demonstrate the fact just mentioned ; thus he says that when the infant has been suffering hunger, " in or to appease it, he seeks to put into .his mouth, frequently without success, his fingers or those of strangers when Jie hap- pens to take hold of them .... The child knows that when something is put into his mouth hunger is appeased .... He knows how to find the place where hunger and thirst make themselves felt, no matter how inex- perienced he is in the movements of his arms and hands with which he tries to reach it. It is certain that it is neither on the ground of instinctive design, nor through the effect of personal experience, that the child is able during his first days to localize exactly pleasure orvpain, and as little can he distinguish the parts of his body. stretching the body, and, of course, sucking and crying; and also at the same period the fact that the desire to suck was occasioned by coming in contact with a soft and warm hand. He also classes with those reflex-actions which are alto- gether independent of experience, the winking of the eyes, which, during the first two weeks, is caused by the hearing of certain noises. has y \\liioh the - ? when the sole ^ . r.:or.: whioh ho r.oiioos wi * - ; sense,* The explain ' 3 rather hazard ov.s. B - -.n^ans