If m' '^ UUUlt 1j iilllll liiiil ^m^ I IwiD THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES GIFT OB Sigurd B. Hustvedt ^ v^ iiivVsYt-J "by H"JWlirO , frjiii a. Portrait" by aOBERT LEIIiMTON, r///'t]Km/ rr/^ • ^/a.J/, ,..• Ilu,},;,i: X: P.ifyj;,, ,,,■/,;■ /<.>» Af.ll:-/: TS». A PRACTICAL COMMENTARY Ll'ON THE FIRST EPISTLE OF ST. PETER; AND OTHEK EXPOSITOKY WORKS: BY THE MOST REVEEEND FATHEU IN GOD, ROBERT LEIGHTON, D.D., ARCHBISHOP OF GLASGOW. TO\VHI(;H IS PREFIXED A LIFE OF THE AUTHOR, THE REV. JOHN NORMAN PEARSON, M.A. OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, AND CHAPLAIN TO THE MOST NOBLE THE MARQUESS WELLESLEV, dvntoMOi tUv rSiSj, (puyh (iovou v^o; fiovov. — Plotiisi Ennead. 6, L. 9. c. xi. A NEW ED ITION,—IN TWO rOLUMES. VOLUME I. LONDON: JAMES DUNCAN, 37, P ATE RN O STE R -RO W ; HATCHARD AND SON; SEELEY AND SONS; AND J. NISBET, LONDON; PARKEll, OXFORD; J. AND J.J. DEIGHTON, CAMBRIDGE; AND BELL AND BRAnFUTE, EDINBURGH. MDCCGXXX. LONDON ; I'nnti'd by William Clowes, Stain ford-.slreet. 55 Z7^S- ter CONTENTS OF THE FIRST VOLUME. PAGE Life of Archbishop Leighton, by the Rev. J. N. Pearson i Preface by the Rev. Dr. Doddridge cxciii Tivo Letters attributed to the Bishop clxxxi A PRACTICAL COMMENTARY ON THE FfRST EPISTLE GENERAL OF PETER. Chap. 1 1 I L (to verse 20) 171 PREFACE. A NEW edition of Archbishop Leighton's Works being called for, it was thought desirable to accompany it with a more complete life, than has yet been given to the world, of their venerable author. To accomplish this object no trouble and expense have been spared by the publisher. Old sources of information have been explored anew ; and inquiries have been insti- tuted wherever there was even a faint prospect of col- lecting materials, which had escaped the diligent search of former biographers. It was indeed to be appre- hended that, after the lapse of nearly a century and a half, little would be obtainable from local recollections ; and that the voice of tradition, if not totally silent, would speak only in broken and indistinct murmurs. And such in some degree is the case. The shadows of forgetfulness have closed upon almost all that Leighton Vol. I, a 11 PREFACE. said or did, of which the memory has not been per petuated by its connexion with matters of poUtical interest : and of those httle anecdotes which have reached this distant period with his name engraven on them, the descent is commonly so obscure and uncertain, that it has been thought better to reject what may possibly be genuine, than to run any risk of admitting what is spurious. It is almost needless to state, that a considerable portion of the ensuing narrative is drawn from Bishop Burnet's History of his own Times ; nothing of any consequence which is told in that work being omitted in this memoir. To the present compiler, however, one fund of information has been opened, to wliich none of his predecessors had access. He alludes to a manuscript letter, of which through the kindness of Mr. Duncan he is now possessed, which was addressed to Bishop Burnet by Mr. Edward Lightmaker, whose mother was Leigh- ton's own sister. It was the happiness of this lady to have her brother for a member of her household during the last ten years of his life ; so that her son had great opportunities, though his tender years pre- vented his reaping the full benefit of them, of storing up interesting particulars of the Bishop's life and conversation. To verify by external evidence the manuscript so fortunately preserved to us has been PREFACE, Hi found impossible : but the internal proof is so strong- as to preclude any reasonable doubt of its being- the auto- graph of Leighton's nephew ; and its genuineness being- ascertained, no question can arise about its authenticity. The composition of it is confused and disorderly : for the worthy writer, in noting down the memorable actions and sayings of his revered uncle, as they occurred to his memory, has interspersed many pious and affectionate remarks, which, however cre- ditable to the kindliness of his nature, are prejudicial to the distinctness of his narration. It has exercised the sedulous care of the present biographer to extract the valuable portions of this medley, and to arrange them in the order that chronology seemed to pre- scribe, or that served best to illustrate the Arch- bishop's character. One of the surest proofs of the genuineness of this document arises from four letters subjoined to it, which purport to be copied from Leighton's autographs, and are so thoroughly imbued with his incomparable spirit as to place their parent- age beyond dispute. Besides drawing largely from this mine, hitherto unwrought, I have endeavoured, by ransacking a variety of records for incidental notices of the subject, to enrich this memoir with new particulars, and to rectify former inaccuracies concerning facts and dates. a 2 IV PREFACE. To this end, the manuscripts in the Advocates' Library, and the Town Register of Edinburgh, have been carefully inspected ; and nothing, I believe, has been overlooked that would have contributed to the object in hand, among the various papers in the College Library at Glasgow. Moreover, the " Memoranda of Dr. Robert Leighton, Bishop of Dumblain, by Bishop Kennet," which are among the Lansdown ma- nuscripts, have been collated with the chapter in Wodrow's History which treats of the attempted Accommodation, and proves to be a transcript from the former, with a few inconsiderable addi- tions. For some of these researches I have been indebted to Mr. Fleming, the Librarian of Glasgow College ; and for some to Dr. M'Crie of Edinburgh, than whom an abler auxiliary could not be desired in biographical investigations. The Rev. Mr. Grier- son, also, the respectable minister of Dunblane, has been at pains, which I regret to add have proved unavailing, to detect any relics of the venerable saint, that had not yet mouldered away, or been dis- covered and enshrined by some antecedent historian. Upon tlie whole, however, the success of our researches has outgone our anticipations ; and scattered frag- ments have been redeemed, which are found, when put together, of a value tliat well repays the labour PREFACE. V it has cost to gather them up. If not sufficient to fill up, yet they narrow, the chasms which broke the continuity of the holy Prelate's life ; they connect and illustrate many incidents of his public career ; and the intervals of his several appearances amidst the scenes of his eventful era are at least so far contracted, that we cannot fail to recognise in him, as often as he revisits us, the friend with whose mien and carriage we are happily familiar. In the biograpliical relation now presented to the world, the public conduct of Leighton is discussed in such detail, as may possibly be deemed an invasion of the province of history. But I felt it incumbent on me to treat this part of my subject with an almost his- torical minuteness; because, after balancing friendly against hostile representations, I became fully satis- fied that those actions of his life, which might seem to tarnish his fair fame, can be so regarded only when misunderstood ; and will be found, if truly repre- sented, to set the seal on his reputation for purity of purpose and for rehgious devotedness. In dehneating Leighton 's personal character, it has been my steadfast aim to avoid the ensnaring fault of drawing a beau- tiful portrait, and naming it after the subject of the memoir, instead of copying with scrupulous exact- ness his real form and features. Accordingly, I Vi PREFACE. ha\'e endeavoured, as far as was practicable, to let my readers see liim act and hear liim talk , and in executing this purpose, I have found the letter before adverted to incalculably useful. In many in- stances the words reported for the Archbishop's are transcribed ; and where only his sentiment is given, conscientious, and I trust successful, pains have been taken to exliibit it pure and incorrupt. After attempting a general account of his merits as a writer, and of the characteristics of his mind and style, 1 thought it unadvisable to go to any length in reviewing his several works. To enume- rate their excellencies would have been endless ; and candour did not seem to require their blemishes to be pointed out, except in a solitary instance, inas much as those blemishes are few and unimportant; surprisingly few and unimportant, when it is con- sidered how wide a range of science and learning his writings comprehend, and that none of them were designed for publication. It is greatly to be deplored that some of his pro- ductions, which came into the hands of his earlier editors, are since irrecoverably lost. I allude par- ticularly to his discourses on that masterly summary f)f christian d(»(tiiiie and ])ractice composed for the E])hebians by St. Paul, on wliich the powers of PREFACE. VU Leighton's congenial mind could not fail of being- happily exerted. In an advertisement prefixed to the first edition of the 2nd vol. of his Commentary on Peter, published in London in 1694, Dr. Fall says that these discourses are in his possession, and he holds out a prospect of their being hereafter printed : and Mr. Wilson, in his preface to the edi tion of 1748, speaks of trying to recover them. Mention is also made by Dr. Doddridge, in his pre- face to Wilson's edition, of a large collection of the Archbishop's Letters, communicated by Dr. Latham of Derby, and by the Rev. Mr. WiUiam Arthur of Newcastle, which were meant to be inserted in a future and more extended life. But the hopes thus raised have died away. Enough, however, remains of this extraordinary man, to establish his title to an illustrious place in the highest class of theologians, as well as in the glorious company of saints. The hours which the compiler of this memoir has spent in contemplating its subject have not, he trusts, been misemployed, as relates to his own improvement : nor will they have been wasted in respect to public utility, if body, colour, and distinctness have been added to the portrait of a christian, whose ideas of the holiness wliich becomes our spiritual caUing, far Vm PREFACE. as they surpass all vulgar couceptions, were yet realized, to the utmost that human weakness seems capable of attaining, in his own habitual walk and conversation. London, ^Isf December, 1824. THE LIFE OF AECHBISHOP LEIGHTON. Jl he name of Leighton occurs in some of the oldest annals of Scottish history. It belonged to a respectable family, proprietary of the barony of Ulis- haven, otherwise called Usan, which is a demesne in Craig, a considerable fishing-village in the county of Forfar. Of this name the spelling is very various, as will commonly be the case with the patronymic of a family, of which the scattered vestiges appear at wide intervals in the wilderness of the unlettered ages. It is spelt, Leichtoune, Lichtoun, Lyghton, Lighten, and in several other fasliions, which are not respectively fixed to certain dates, but seem to have obtained indiscriminately in the same eras. One may remark, however, that the modern ortho- graphy of the name is the same which presents itself in registers of the greatest antiquity. In the Rotuli Scotiae, wliich have lately been published from the original records in the Tower, we read that A. D. 1374, John de Leighton, clericus de Scotia, obtained a safe conduct to Oxford, there to X THE LIFE OF prosecute his studies. Whether this zealot of lite- rature was of the Usan race cannot now be certainly determined. To the ancestors of that family, however, may be assigned the meed of sturdy warriors, on the authority of a quaint chronicle, which relates that Schir Walter of Ogilvy, that gud knycht, Stout and manful, bauld and wycht, being sheriff of Angus, was killed in 1392, at Gas- klune or Glenbrerith near Blairgowrie in Perthshire, by a party of three hundred Highlanders. Ogilvy, with Sir Patrick Gray, Sir David Lindsay of Glenesk, and about sixty men, encountered the enemy. Gray and Lindsay were wounded ; and Sir Walter Ogilvy, Walter Leighton of Ulishaven, his uterine brother, and some of their friends, were killed. Besides this testimony to the prowess of a Leigh- ton in the days of feudal lawlessness, there is proof that in the beginning of the fifteenth century the same family was inscribed in the lists of ecclesi- astical dignity and political importance. Mention is made by Keith, in his catalogue of Scottish Bishops, of one Henry Leighton, parson of Duffus, and chan- tor of Moray, "legum doctor et baccalaureus in de- cretis," a son of the ancient family of the Leightons of Ulyshaven, who was consecrated Bishop of Mo- ray in 1414, or 1415, and was translated about ten years afterwards to the see of Aberdeen. He was one of the commissioners sent to London to nego- tiate the ransom of James I., with whom he returned to Scotland ; where he is supposed to have died A. D. 144L ARCHBISHOP LEIGHTON. XI Although it may be received for a fact, that the subject of our memoir was descended from this ancient and respectable family, yet it has been found im- possible to trace all the steps of his pedig-ree. The family itself had undoubtedly declined in wealth and credit, before the birth of the individual who was destined to reflect upon it a new and transcendent lustre : for it is on record that, A. D. 1619, a part at least of its original estates had been alienated ; and in 1670, there is a grant under the great seal to Charles Maitland of Halton of the barony of Ullishaven, escheated to the king in consequence of John, earl of Dundee, d>ing without male issue. The father of Archbishop Leighton was Dr. Alex- ander Leighton, a presbyterian clergym.an of unhappy celebrity. In the reign of Charles I., he was sen- tenced by the Star-chamber, for a virulent attack upon episcopacy in a book entitled "Zion's Plea against Prelacy," to be w^hipt and pilloried, to have his ears cropt, liis nose slit, and his cheeks branded. This barbarous punishment was rigorously inflicted; and to it were superadded, during a long imprisonment, such atrocious severities, as savoured more of vin- dictive malignity than of judicial retribution. No apo- logy would be valid^ or even decent, for cruelties which W'Cre revolting alike to justice^ to humanity, and to rehgion. That the wretched sufferer, however, was of a cross, untowardly disposition, may be conjectured from his having brought himself under the lash of the law, in the preceding reign, by stubbornly refusing to abandon the irregular practice of medicine. There XU THE LIFE OF is a f'act^ inoieover, not generally known, which may account for the excessive rigour with which his sub- sequent offences were visited. Not only was the book for which he was so severely handled outrageously scurrilous and inflammatory in its contents, but there were collateral circumstances attending its publica- tion, that betokened a mischievous purpose in the writer. In the first edition no name is given either of printer or author ; and instead of the date in the usual way, we find, " Printed the year and moneth wherein Rochell was lost." The frontispiece exhibits on one page a lamp burning, supported by a book, and guarded by two men with naked swords ; which hieroglyphic is explained by the legend : Prevailing' prelats strive to quench our li^lit, Except your sacred power quash tlieir might. On the other page is the representation of an antique dilapidated tower. Out of its ruins grows an elder- bush, from the branches of which several bishops are falling, one of them holding in his hand a large box. This device is interpreted by the motto : The totteriug" prelats, with their trumpery, all Sliall moulder down, like elder from a wall. Tlic place of Archbishop Leighton's birth has been much disputed. It is commonly believed that he was a native of London ; on the strength I imagine of IJurnet's assertion, that he was sent from thence to bc^ educated in Scotland. This, however, is in- ferring too !ni!ch : for he may have been carried up. ARCHBISHOP LE1GHT()>J. Xlll in his infancy, from Scotland to London, when his father settled in that city. Craig- also claims him for her son : but this claim seems to rest solely on the fact of his direct or collateral ancestors having been considerable proprietors in that vil lag-e ; a foundation too weak to sustain the hypo- thesis, which a virtuous solicitude to make out their affinity with so eminent a person has induced the inhabitants to raise upon it. To my mind there are unanswerable reasons for assigning that distinction to Edinburgh. In the inscription on his tomb-stone, Leighton is said to have died in his 74th year ; and deducting 73 from 1684, the undisputed year of his decease, we shall have 1611 for the year of his nativity. The same amount is obtained by deduct- ing 30, the number of his years when he took orders, from 1641, which is the date of that transaction. Now, his father was at that time professor of moral philosophy in Edinburgh College*, and did not go up to London until two years afterwards ■[ ; and it is certainly to be presumed, not a shadow of evidence appearing to the contrary, that the son was born in the place wherein the father was then residing. He had one younger brother, of whom mention will be made hereafter, and two sisters ; one of whom w as * Of this professorship I meet with the following notice, in a work entitled " The Present State of Scotland," London, 1738. " It (Ihe Col- lege) was founded in 1580, by King James VI., upon a petition from the city for that end, to grant them a charter, with the privilege of an uni- versity. But the foundation was not perfected till 1582. The persons established by the foundation were, a principal or piimare, four regents or masters of philosophy, &c." — p. 62. •i- See Chalmers" Biograph. Diet. XIV THE LIFE OF married to a Mr. Lightmaker, a gentleman of landed property in Sussex ; and the other to a Mr. Rathband, as appears from a single allusion in one of her brother's letters. Of his early years we have only a scanty though a valuable notice. It appears from the unques- tionable authority of his sister, that, from his ien- derest ag-e, his singular teachableness and piety endeared him greatly to his parents ; who used to speak with admiration of his extraordinary exemption from childish faults and follies. At college his behaviour was so uniformly excel- lent as to attract the notice of his superiors ; and one of them^ in a letter to Dr. Leighton_, congratu- lates him on having a son, in whom Providence has made him abundant compensation for his sufferings. There is still in existence a humorous poem on Dr. Aikenhead_, Warden of the college, which Leigh- ton wrote when an undergraduate. It evinces a good-natured playfulness of fancy, but is not of a merit that calls for publication. After taking his degree, Leighton passed several years in travelling, and in the studies proper to qualify him for future usefulness. It was his opi- nion, that great advantages are to be reaped from a residence in foreign parts ; inasmuch as a large acquaintance with the sentiments of strangers, and with the civil and religious institutions, the manners and usages of other countries, conduces to un- fetter the mind of indijrenous prejudices, to abate the self-sufiiciency of partial knowledge, and to pro- ARCHBISHOP LEIGHTON. XV duce a sober and charitable estimate of opinions that differ from our own. Many years afterwards, he recommended a similar course to his nephew^ alleging-, that " there is a very peculiar advantage in travel, not to be understood but by the trial of it ; and that for himself he nowise repented the time he had spent in that way." During his stay abroad, Leighton was often at Douay, where some of his relations had setded. In this seminary he appears to have met with some religionists, whose lives were framed on the strictest model of primitive piety. Though keenly alive to the faults of popery, he did not consider the Romish church to be utterly antichristian ; but thought he discerned in it beautiful fragments of the original temple, however disfigured with barbarous addi- tions, and almost hid beneath the rampant growth of a baneful superstition. Having learnt from these better portions of that corrupt estabhshment, that its constitutions were not altogether dross, he went on to discover that the frame of his own church was not entirely gold : nor did it escape him, that in the sweeping extermination, so clamorously demanded in Scotland, of all those offices of devotion which sym- bolized with the Roman Catholic services, some of the noblest formularies and most useful institutes of the primitive church would perish. It was probably from this time that his veneration for the presbyterian platform began to abate. He was thirty years old before he took holy orders; and in deferring to so ripe an age his en- XVI THE LIFE OF trance on the ministry, as well as in retiring* so early as he (lid from its more laborious province^, he acted agreeably to his avowed opinion, that " some men preach too soon, and some too long-." His judgment of what is most reverent towards God corresponded with those canons of the Levitical economy, which prescribe a mature age for engaging in the more arduous department of the sacerdotal office, and grant an honourable superannuation at that period of life^ Avhen the strength of mind and body com- monly begins to decay. It was on the sixteenth day of December, A. D. 1641, that Leighton was ordained and admitted minister of Newbottle, in Midlothian, a i)arish in the presbytery of Dalkeith. No pains have been spared to retrieve traditional remi- niscences of the manner in which this exemplary pastor discharo'ed the duties of an office which he w^us so rehgiously fearful of undertaking. But research has been fruitless. No traces remain of his parochial ministrations, which doubtless fill an ample page in that book of Divine remembrance, from which no work of faith, no labour of love, is ever obliterated. Of the general tenor, however, of his life and ministerial occupations, we have a few invaluable noiices in Burnet's History of his own Time. En- grossed with the care of his parish, he seldom mixed in the convocations of the presbyters, to whom indeed he was obnoxious, because he condemned their prac- tice of descanting on the Covenant fnjm the pulpit, and their stern determination to force that bitter morsel OH conscientious objectors. It was his aim to win ARCHBISHOP LEIGHTON. XVU converts to Jesus Christ, not proselytes to a party. And exemplary indeed must he have been, if that picture of a finished evangelist, which his intimate friend has produced in the beautiful Discourse of the Pastoral Care, was faithfully copied from the lively pattern exhibited by Leighton. Yet the blame- less sanctity of his manners, his professional excel- lence, and his studious inofFensiveness, were not enough to content the zealots of his church. In a synod he was publicly reprimanded for not " preach- ing up the times." " Who," he asked, " does preach up the times ?" It was answered that all the brethren did it. " Then," he rejoined, " if all of you preach up the times, you may surely allow one poor brother to preach up Christ Jesus and eternity." Although Leighton was averse both by temper and principle from meddling with politics, yet there were certain conjunctures of perplexity and peril, in which he thought himself bound to set an ex- ample to his flock of intrepid loyalty. In the year 1648, he acceded to the Engagement for the King ; a step which would have involved him in serious trouble with the republican government, but for the interposition of the Earl of Lothian, and the charm of his personal character. When the Engagement ex- pired in the discomfiture of those enterprises to which it had given birth, he was placed in a very delicate predicament ; in which, however, his beha- viour was creditable not less to his political discretion, than to his Christian boldness and integrity. Called Vol. I. b Xviii THE LIFE OF upon in his official capacity to admonish some of his parishioners, — from whom there was apubhc profession of repentance for their concern in that very Engage- ment to which he had himself subscribed, — he directed their consciences to the many offences against mo- rality and religion which they had committed in the course of their military service ; and of these, without touching on the grounds of the expedition and the merits of their cause, he solemnly charged them to repent. About this time, we find him in correspondence with several of the episcopal clergy, and especially with Bishop Burnet's father. His mind seems to have been led, by observing the faults under which the presbyterian discipline labours, to an attentive examination of the episcopal form, notwith- standing the antipathy to it wliich had been instilled into him with his mother's milk, and which must have been augmented by a pious resentment of his father's sufferings. Although Leighton never considered any particular mode of ecclesiastical polity a point of suffi- cient moment to justify schism, yet it is clear that from this time he regarded the episcopal model as adapted beyond any other to the edification of the church universal. Assuredly it was no prospect of secular preferment that helped him to shake off the prepossessions of his early years, for his worldly interest pointed another way. Besides, conversions to which unriohteous motives have conduced are usually characterized by extraordinary bitterness against the deserted party ; whereas Leighton, after ARCHBISHOP LEIGHTON. XlX becoming a moderate episcopalian, breathed nothing* towards his former associates but good- will and kind- ness. He wholly sequestered himself, indeed, from their legislative conclaves, and at length relinquished his cure. But he took this last step, not from any scruple about continuing to officiate in a church of Calvinistic construction, but from hearty repugnance to that system of spiritual despotism, which had been linked by violent and ambitious men with the pres- byterian cause. It must have been in the latter part of his resi- dence at Newbottle that a calamity befel him, which gave occasion to a striking manifestation of his indif ference to money, of his large-heartedness and piety. At his father's death, he came into possession of about a thousand pounds, which constituted his whole property. This sum he placed, or allowed to remain, in the hands of a merchant without adequate security, notwithstanding the remonstrances of Mr. Lightmaker, his brother-in-law, who urged him to come up to Lon- don and invest it more safely. Leighton's reply to this good counsel is highly characteristic : — Sir, I thank you for your letter. That you give me no- tice of I desire to consider as becomes a Christian, and to prepare to wait for my own removal. What business follows upoii my father's may be well enough done without me, as I have writ more at large to Mr. E , and desired him to show you the letter when you meet. Any pittance belonging to me may possibly be useful and needful for my subsistence ; but truly, if something else draw me not, I shall never bestow b2 XX THE LIFE OF SO long a journey on that I account so mean a business. Re- member my love to my sister your wife, and to my brother and sister llathband, as you have opportunity. I am glad to hear of the welfiu-e of you all, and above all things wish for myself and you all our daily increase in likeness to Jesus Christ, and growing heavenwards, where he is who is our treasure. To his grace I recommend you. Sir, Your affectionate brother, December 31, 1G49. li. Lkighton. Before long- the event anticipated by Mr. Light- maker took phice. Tlie merchant tailed, and Leighton's patrimony was irretrievably lost. How he took this misfortune may be gathered from the following letter to his brother-in-law : — Sir, Your kind advice I cannot but thank you for, but I am not easily taught that lesson. I confess it is the wiser way to trust nobody ; but there is so much of the fool in my nature as carries me rather to the other extreme, to trust every body. Yet I will endeavour to take the best courses I can in that little business you write of. It is true there is a lawful, yea a needful, diligence in such things : but, alas ! how poor are they to the ]K)rti()n of believers, where our treasure is. That little that was in Mr. E.'s hands hath failed me; but I shall either have no need of it, or be supplied some other way. And this is the relief of my rolling thoughts, that while I am writing this, this nionunt is passing away, and all the hazards of want and .sickness shall be at an end. j\Iy mother writes to me, and pn sses my coming up. 1 know not yet if that can be; b\it 1 iiitLiKJ, God willing, so soon as I can con- veniently, if 1 come not, to take some course that things be done as if I were there, I h()j)e you will have patience in the ARCHBISHOP LEIGHTON. XXI mean time. Remember my love to my sisters. The Lord be with you, and lead you in his ways. Your loving Brother, Newbottle, II. Leighton. Feb. 4th, 1650. Being in England some time afterwards, his recent loss was touched upon by Mr. Lightmaker, who re- gretted that he had so sadly misplaced his confidence. " Oh ! no more of that," cried Leighton ; " the good man has escaped from the care and vexation of that business." " What, is that all you make of the matter?" rejoined his brother-in-law with surprise. " Truly," answered the other, " if the Duke of New- castle, after losing nineteen times as much of yearly income, can dance and sing, while the solid hopes of Christianity will not avail to support us^ we had better be as the world." Somewhere about this time, — for the date cannot be assigned with certainty, — an event occurred which drew forth a proof of his admirable self-possession in the sudden prospect of death. He had taken the water at the Savoy stairs, in company with his brother Sir Ellis, the knight's lady, and some others, and was on his way to Lambeth, when, owing to some misma- nagement, the boat was in imminent danger of sinking'. While the rest of the party were pale with terror, and most of them crying out, Leighton never for a moment lost his accustomed serenity. To some, who afterwards expressed their astonishment at his calmness, he replied : — " Why, what harm would it have been, if we had all been safe landed on the other side?" In Xxii THE LIFE OF the habit of dyiii