m mm ill CAMBRIDGE PHYSICAL SERIES GENERAL EDITORS : A. HUTCHINSON, M.A. AND W. C. D. WHETHAM, M.A., F.R.S. MECHANICS CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS HonUon: FETTER LANE, E.G. C. F. CLAY, MANAGER CEbiniurgfj: 100, PRINCES STREET ALSO HenUon: H. K. LEWIS, 136, GOWER STREET, W.C. Berlin: A. ASHER AND CO. Eetpjig: F. A. BROCKHAUS tto gork: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS anb Calcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD. All rights reserved ARCHIMEDES MECHANICS BY JOHN COX, M.A., F.R.S.C. HONORARY LL.D., QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY, KINGSTON J FORMERLY PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS IN M C GILL UNIVERSITY, MONTREAL; SOMETIME FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. CAMBRIDGE: AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1909 if First Edition 1904 Reprinted 1909 TO ERNST MACH, Pn.D, PKOFESSOB IN THE UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA, WHOSE GENIUS HAS ILLUMINATED THE HISTOEICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL DEVELOPEMENT OF MECHANICS AND MANY OTHER BRANCHES OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE, THIS BOOK IS GRATEFULLY INSCRIBED. 311873 PEEFACE. TT is a common complaint that though the principles of Mechanics are the simplest and the earliest to be discovered in the whole range of Science, and moreover are directly illustrated in almost every act of our lives, more difficulty is found in giving beginners a real grip of them than with any other branch of Physics. This I attribute largely to the way in which the text-books deal with the subject. The student usually opens the book upon a chapter in which such leading concepts as matter, force, mass, particle, rigid body, smooth body are treated in definitions of a line or two each, before he sees any reason for their introduction at all. He is probably warned that philosophers are not agreed about the nature of matter ; that motion is purely relative ; that force is a misleading idea borrowed from our muscular sensations and better got rid of; and that no such things as mathematical particles, rigid bodies and smooth bodies exist in nature. He naturally concludes that Mechanics is an abstruse subject having nothing to do with realities or common sense. The second chapter plunges him into the mathematical study of motion in the abstract. Here he struggles with variable velocity and acceleration, and the kinematic formulae; and is lucky if he is let off without a discussion of motion in a circle and in a cycloid, simple harmonic motion, and the parabola. To his previous confusion he adds the conviction that this is only another branch of the pure mathematics he has hitherto found so little use for. viii PREFACE At last there is a chapter on the Laws of Motion, so in- adequately treated that he oftens ends by believing that they were made up by Sir Isaac Newton, the author, so far as he is aware, of the whole subject. The rest of the book is too often merely geometrical and trigonometrical gymnastics. In recent years many text-book writers have attempted to break away from this mischievous tradition. Some have tried to rewrite the whole subject from the latest point of view of Energetics. But this is surely to begin at the wrong end. According to the biologists the bodily development of the individual is an epitome of the development of the race. Is not this a hint that the historical method is the natural way of attacking a subject of study? Others have sought to discard the idea of force, and speak only of mass-accelerations. "Naturam expellas furca." It is rarely indeed that they manage twenty pages without getting back to the old point of view. With proper caution the use of this concept is as valuable as it is historically right and inevitable. Still others have set the student to rediscover the subject for himself by experiment. But this wastes too much time on mere manipulation, and leaves the student's knowledge in mid air, unrelated to all that has gone before him in the course of actual discovery. It seems a pity that he should close the book without a glimmering of personal interest in his predecessors, the great investigators, and forego the insight into philosophic and scientific method which a study of the development of Mechanics evokes insensibly and unawares. No claim for originality can be made for this book. And yet I find it difficult to make detailed acknowledgement of obligations, for it embodies the system of teaching Mechanics at which I have arrived after thirty, years' experience, and it is no longer possible to say where certain illustrations and ways of putting things have come from, or whether (less probably) they were devised by PREFACE IX myself. A desire to shew whence the general plan has arisen must be my excuse for a personal digression. After learning and teaching Mechanics for ten years on the traditional system described above, I was called on, as a lecturer under the Cambridge University Extension Scheme, to explain the principles to audiences without any previous mathematical training, but often composed of engineers, plumbers, and other workmen who had derived excellent practical notions on the subject from their experience. Obliged thus to recast the subject in my own mind, I found it possible to present all the main principles with the aid of ordinary arithmetic and the simplest geometrical diagrams. At this stage Sir Robert Ball's admirable lectures on Experimental Mechanics gave me great assistance. My experience with these popular audiences reacted with advan- tage on my teaching with classes in the University, and fired me with the ambition to write a text-book on Mechanics. But a sight of Sir Oliver Lodge's excellent Mechanics in Chambers' series put an end to this wish for a time. Some ten years ago I stumbled on the first German edition of Professor Mach's Die Mechanik in ihre Entwickelung. I am ashamed to say that this fascinating book was my first introduction to the historical development of a subject I had taught so long. Since then my teaching has been based more and more on the lines laid down by Mach, and as I have found it impossible to induce ordinary students to read the original, even when translated, I recurred to the idea of writing a text-book which should yet be based on Mach's method. The present book is the result. In producing it I have kept in view the following aims: (1) First and throughout, to make a text-book of mechanical principles, avoiding as far as possible merely mathematical difficulties, and reserving those that could not be avoided for separate treatment in the later parts of the book ; but never shirking them where necessary. X PREFACE (2) To develops the principles in their historical order, starting from real problems, as the subject started, shewing how the great investigators attacked those problems, and only intro- ducing the leading concepts as they arise necessarily and naturally in the course of solving them. (3) To bring out incidentally the points of philosophic interest and the method of science. (4) To appeal constantly to experiment, as far as possible in the original form, for purposes of verification in the early part of the subject, leading up to an experimental course limited to the most important practical applications. In this way a good deal is included in the later chapters which does not usually find a place in elementary text-books. (5) To interest the student in the personality of the great pioneers, and if possible induce the habit of referring to original sources. (6) Not to overload the text with masses of examples; to give only so many that every student should work them all ; and to select these so as to bring in useful and interesting physical constants, and make them as direct as possible, discarding all those in which the amount of mechanical principle involved is a mere drop to an intolerable deal of pure mathematical exercise. Any intelligent teacher can multiply examples of a given type, where this is necessary, either from his own invention or from the numerous extant collections. Unintelligent teachers have no business with Mechanics. It will be obvious that the Book could never have been written but for Mach's Mechanik. It is indeed only a poor and incomplete abridgement of Mach's work intended for students. I trust that every teacher into whose hands it may fall, and many students, will be driven by it to the original. It is impossible for me to express my personal obligation to Professor Mach in connection with this subject, or the respect and gratitude I feel for such PREFACE XI a master for enlightenment and inspiration in this as in many other branches of Physics. Further acknowledgement must be made of help from Clerk Maxwell's Matter and Motion, Sir Oliver Lodge's Pioneers of Science, Mr W. W. R. Ball's Essay on Newton s Principia, Professor Wright's Mechanics, and Glazebrook and Shaw's Practical Physics, to which many of the experiments described in the latter part of the book are due. The Dynamics of Principal Garnett must be specially mentioned, for it was in reading the proof-sheets of that work that I first learned to connect the familiar formulae with practical facts. My especial thanks are due to Mr F. H. Neville, one of the Editors of the Cambridge Physical Series, not only for his extreme care in revising the book for the press, but for many most valuable criticisms and suggestions that have led to important improve- ments. The course, as laid down, has been tested with classes at McGill University, and has, I think, proved interesting and intelligible. Many of the illustrations are from photographs of actual apparatus used here. Whether the book will be found adapted to students anywhere else is a subject of much misgiving. It aims at no particular examinations, and may be too revolutionary to find favour in schools. Its execution is probably faulty enough. But that something of this nature would be a more worthy treatment of the subject for university students, even for the ordinary degree, than the present jejune versions of Varignon's Statics and mathematical exercises on kinematics, I have no doubt at all. Until Mechanics is clad in its historical flesh and blood, it will remain the dull and tiresome subject that has convinced so many generations of students that an abysmal gulf separates theory from practice. J. C. MONTREAL, April, 1904. CONTENTS. BOOK I THE WINNING OF THE PRINCIPLES. CHAPTER PAGE Introduction .......... 1 I. The Beginnings of Statics. Archimedes. Problem of the Lever and of the Centre of Gravity .... 3 II. Experimental Verification and Applications of the Principle of the Lever ......... 10 III. The Centre of Gravity 23 IV. The Balance 32 V. Stevinus of Bruges. The Principle of the Inclined Plane . 41 VI. The Parallelogram of Forces . . . . . . .48 VII. The Principle of Virtual Work 52 VIII. Review of the Principles of Statics 66 IX. The Beginnings of Dynamics. Galileo. The Problem of Falling Bodies 69 X. Huyghens. The Problem of Uniform Motion in a Circle. "Centrifugal Force" 84 XL Final Statement of the Principles of Dynamics. Extension to the Motions of the Heavenly Bodies. The Law of Uni- versal Gravitation. Newton 88 BOOK II. MATHEMATICAL STATEMENT OF THE PRINCIPLES. Introduction . . . . ... . . . . 103 XI I. Kinematics .......... 105 XIIL Kinetics of a Particle moving in a Straight Line. The Laws of Motion 116 XIV. Experimental Verification of the Laws of Motion. Atwood's Machine 136 XIV CONTENTS XV. XVI. XVII. XVIII. XIX. Work and Energy The Parallelogram Law .... The Composition and Resolution of Forces. Component. Equilibrium Forces in One Plane Resultant. 142 155 159 173 Friction . 193 BOOK III. APPLICATION TO VARIOUS PROBLEMS. XX. Motion on an Inclined Plane. Brachistochrones. XXI. Projectiles XXII. Simple Harmonic Motion . . . XXIII. The Simple Pendulum XXIV. Central Forces. The Law of Gravitation . XXV. Impact and Impulsive Forces .... 207 213 224 237 243 257 BOOK IV. THE ELEMENTS OF RIGID DYNAMICS. XXVI. The Compound Pendulum. Huyghens 3 Solution . .271 XXVII. D'Alembert's Principle 2*76 XXVIII. Moment of Inertia 281 XXIX. Experimental Determination of Moments of Inertia . 289 XXX. Determination of the Value of Gravity by Eater's Pendulum 303 XXXI. The Constant of Gravitation, or Weighing the Earth. The Cavendish Experiment 313 ANSWERS TO THE EXAMPLES 324 INDEX 328 PLATES. Archimedes Galileo . Huyghens Newton . to face page 69 85 89 BOOK I. THE WINNING OF THE PRINCIPLES. OF THE UNIVERSITY OF INTRODUCTION. BY Mechanics is understood nowadays the science, or organized body of knowledge we possess concerning the conditions of rest or motion of the objects about us. How did we come by it ? The word itself means " con- trivances," and gives a hint that the science arose from the devices which were found helpful in lifting weights and moving objects to satisfy practical needs. Long before there was any collection of rules, much less a science of Mechanics, the ad- vantages of the traditional " Mechanical Powers " the Lever ; the Wheel and Axle (or continuous lever); the Pulley (or travelling lever) ; the Inclined Plane ; the Wedge (or double inclined plane) ; and the Screw (or continuous inclined plane) were known. The great monuments of antiquity, like the Pyramids, could hardly have been raised by the labour of unaided hands. As a matter of fact, rude implements of the kind have been found in ancient graves, and the Egyptian and Assyrian records contain pictorial representations of such appliances. The transition to what may be properly called science takes place when, for example, instead of the practical knowledge that a great weight may be lifted by a small one with the aid of a crow- bar, a principle, or rule, is discovered, which tells us what must be the lengths of the arms of the crowbar in order that a certain small weight may lift a given large weight. This is a step of immense importance. For once it is made, a craftsman can save innumerable mistakes, with their consequent loss of time and risk of injury, by calculating beforehand what weight or length of lever to employ ; and he can communicate to others what he has learned from his own experience. Thus both Design and the c. 1 2 MECHANICS Dissemination of Knowledge become possible, as when, during the siege of Kimberley, a mining engineer constructed out of a steel axle, ten feet long, a gun capable of replying to the Boer artillery, gathering his information out of some back numbers of the engineering magazines, which happened to be in his possession. Statics, the part of the subject which deals with Equilibrium, being simpler and far more directly concerned with the Mechanical Powers, took its rise much earlier than Dynamics, the science of motion as produced by force. It begins with the clearing up of the Principle of the Lever by Archimedes, to whom is also due the fundamental principle of Hydrostatics. Strange as it may seem, these are the only important contributions to Physical Science of the ancient world Tip to the middle of the sixteenth century, when, after an interval of eighteen hundred years, Stevinus of Bruges attacked the study of Statics again, this time by way of the Inclined Plane. From this time onwards a series of great investigators, Galileo (15641642), Huyghens (16291695), and Newton (1642 1727) laid the foundations of the Dynamics of a single particle, and bodies that could be treated as such. D'Alembert (1743) gave a general principle by which Newton's ideas could be applied to the complicated case of solid bodies consisting of innumerable particles. All that remained to be done was to employ the highest developments of Pure Mathematics in working out the con- sequences of the principles already discovered ; save that towards the middle of the nineteenth century the importance of the doctrine of Energy came to be more and more recognized, and the great generalization known as the Conservation of Energy, dimly foreshadowed in the Principle of Virtual Work and the Scholia to Newton's Third Law of Motion, was finally established and extended from Mechanics to all departments of Physics. We shall begin with Archimedes and the Principle of the Lever. It is instructive to examine this case in some detail, not only for its historical interest, but because it is an admirable example of the way in which Physical Science has developed. CHAPTER I. ARCHIMEDES PEOBLEM OF THE LEVER AND OF THE CENTRE OF GRAVITY. Aos TTOV crra>, KOI TTjv yrjv 1. ARCHIMEDES (287 212 B.C.), the greatest mathematical and inventive genius of antiquity, was born at Syracuse, and com- pleted his education at Alexandria under Conon, in the Royal Schools of the Ptolemies, of which Euclid had been an ornament fifty years earlier. The stories of the crown of Hiero, the burning mirrors, and his slaughter at the end of the siege in spite of Marcellus' orders are well known. 2. Every one knows that a small force applied to one end of a lever, a long way from the point of support, or fulcrum, will overpower a much larger force applied near the fulcrum. The problem is to find a rule connecting the forces and their distances from the fulcrum when they just balance. Those who consult the treatise of Archimedes rrepl eVt7re8o>z/ IcroppOTrifcwv rj /cevrpa ffapcov eTrnreScov, will be struck by two things. He deals entirely with weights, not introducing the general notion of force; and he is so deeply imbued with the methods of the ancient geometers that he tries to cast his proofs of physical propositions into the same form. His very real grip of the Principle of the Lever must have been, in his case as well as that of the craftsmen of his age, a direct result of experience. Yet he finds a satisfaction in reducing it to the already familiar array of Axioms, Proofs by Reductio ad Absurdum, and the geometrical theory of Proportion. 12 MECHANICS [CHAP. He begins by laying down the following Axioms : (1) Equal weights placed at equal distances from the point of support balance. (2) Equal weights placed at unequal distances do not balance, but that which hangs at the greater distance descends. Then follows a proof by reductio ad absurdum that in the case of unequal weights balancing at unequal distances, the greater weight must be at the shorter distance. Before advancing to the actual numerical law connecting the weights and the distances, he now lays down three propositions to shew that the Centre of Gravity of any number of equal weights, odd or even, equally spaced out along a bar, must be at the middle point of the bar. Observe that in these propositions it is clear that he conceives of the centre of gravity as a point such that, if it be supported, the weights will balance about it. He is now able to give a beautifully ingenious proof of the general principle of the Lever, viz. that for equilibrium the weights must be inversely proportional to the distances ; first for the case of commensurable, and then for incommensurable weights. As a historical curiosity, we shall give the former in his own words. 3. Proposition. Magnitudes whose weights are commensur- able will balance if they are hung at distances which are inversely proportional to their weights. Fig. 1. Let a, 6, be commensurable weights. Let ed be any distance, and let dc be to ce as a is to b. It has to be proved that the l] ARCHIMEDES 5 centre of gravity of the magnitude composed of both a and 6, placed at e and d respectively, is the point c. Since dc is to ce as a is to b, and a is commensurable with b, .'. dc is commensurable with ce, a straight line with a straight line. .'. there must be some common measure of dc, ce. Let it be n ; and take dg, dk, on each side of d, equal to ce, and el equal to dc. Since dg ec, .'. also cfc = 6(7, /. also le = eg, .' . Ig is double of c?c, and gk of ec. /. n will measure both Z# and gk, since it measures their halves. And since dc is to ce, as a is to b, and Z# is to gk, as cfc is to ce, for they are the double of each, .*. Ig is to gk as a is to 6. Now let a be the same multiple of a magnitude /, that Ig is of n. Then a is to /"as Ig is to n. But kg is to Jgr as 6 is to a. /. ex aequali, b is toy as kg is to n. .*. kg is the same multiple of n that 6 is off. But it has been shewn that a is also a multiple of/ .*. /is a common measure of a and 6. If therefore Ig be divided into parts equal to n, and a irito parts equal to/ the parts of 0r, each equal to n, will be the same in number as the parts of a, each equal to/ .'. if to each of the parts of Ig there be applied a magnitude equal to/ having its centre of gravity in the middle of the part, all the magnitudes will together be equal to a, and the centre of gravity of the magnitude composed of all of them will be e, for they are equal in number on opposite sides, since le = eg. Similarly it can be shewn that if to each of the parts of kg there be applied a magnitude equal to / having its centre of gravity in the middle of the part, all the magnitudes will together be equal to b, and the centre of gravity of the magnitude composed of them all will be the point d. a has therefore been placed at e, and b at d, and there are now MECHANICS CHAP. an even number of equal magnitudes, placed in a straight line, whose centres of gravity are equally distant from each other. It follows that the centre of gravity of all the magnitudes together is the point of bisection of the straight line in which the centres of gravity of the magnitudes lie. .*. since le = cd, and ec = dk, the whole Ic the whole ck. /. the centre of gravity of the whole is the point c. .*. if a be placed at e, and 6 be placed at d, they will balance about the point c. Q. E. D. 4. But little advance was made on this cumbrous proof for 1800 years, when Stevinus of Bruges (1548 1620 A.D.) gave it the following interesting form. ? * N E E K 1 L M Fig. 2. Consider a uniform column, AC, suspended by its middle point M, so that it will balance. Imagine it divided at EF into two parts whose middle points will be K and L. Then the weights of AF, EC are proportional to GI and IH, and may be supposed collected at K and L. It is easily seen that KM = IL and ML = IK. .'. the greater weight AF is to the smaller weight EC as the longer arm ML is to the shorter arm MK. The second figure shews that the weights may be hung at any depth below the bar, and that any equal weights may be sub- stituted for the parts of the bar. This form of the proof was adopted, with a slight modification, by Galileo (1638) and in modern times by Lagrange. l] STEVINUS. THE LEVER 7 5. In this proof Archimedes and his successors apparently criticism of evolve a physical truth by geometrical methods the proof. from certain axioms which are assumed as self- evident apart from experience. But can this be possible ? Take the first axiom. It seems perhaps self-evident that equal weights at equal distances from the fulcrum must balance, from the mere symmetry of the figure. The ancient philosophers, steeped in the methods of logic and geometry, base such cases of symmetry on what was called the "Principle of Sufficient Reason." No motion can take place, because there is no reason why the balance should descend on one side more than the other. " But we forget in this that a great multitude of negative and positive experiences is implicitly contained in our assumption ; the negative, for instance, that unlike colours of the lever arms, the position of the spectator, an occurrence in the vicinity, and the like, exercise no influence ; the positive, on the other hand (as it appears in the second axiom), that not only the weights, but also their distances from the supporting point are decisive factors in the disturbance of equilibrium " (Mach, The Science of Mechanics). The secret of the immense and rapid development of natural knowledge in modern times lies in the deliberate and faithful ransacking of nature for her facts, since the time of Francis Bacon's Novum Organon. Natural processes can only be learned from experience ; they cannot be extracted from the meanings of words or the canons of logic, after the manner of the ancient world, except in so far as these themselves enshrine the results of direct experience, hereditary or personal. Why should not the position of the sun affect the balancing of an equal-armed, equally- weighted lever, so that it should be horizontal at noon and mid- night, and its eastern limb dip in the morning, its western in the evening ? Nothing but experiment can teach us that the sun has no effect in this case. Let a wire pointing to magnetic north be stretched horizontally over a compass needle, and let an electric current be sent through the wire from South to North. Everything is symmetrical. It might seem an axiom in accordance with the principle of sufficient reason that the magnet will remain at rest. Yet Oerstedt dis- covered in 1821 that the north pole of the magnet will certainly turn to the west. 8 MECHANICS [CHAP. In the Proposition Archimedes is seeking to reduce the general and more unfamiliar case of a lever with unequal arms to the case of the equal-armed lever, which was already so familiar to him that the knowledge of it seemed instinctive or axiomatic. Think of any case of scientific explanation, and you will see that this is all that is accomplished, the reduction of unfamiliar cases to those already familiar. Newton discovers that the moon in her orbit drops towards the earth according to the same law that is familiar in the falling apple ; the motion of the moon is explained, but not that of the apple. But did Archimedes succeed ? It seems unlikely that a method which, apart from experience, fails to justify his first axiom, can possibly lead him to the numerical law of the lever. Closely scrutinized, the fallacy appears. He assumes that a number of weights spaced out along one arm of a lever will have the same turning effect about the fulcrum, as if they were all collected at their centre of gravity ; whereas what he has proved from his axioms in the preliminary propositions is that they will balance about their centre of gravity, if it be supported. Fig. 3. Suppose it had been a question, not of balancing, but of the resistance experienced upon attempting to set the lever AB rotating rapidly about C. We require to find the law connecting unequal weights at unequal distances, so that they may offer the same resistance. May we substitute for A, two weights each equal to J./2, placed symmetrically about A ? Certainly not. But it is only experience that tells us we may do in a question of balancing, or centres of gravity, what we may not do when it concerns moments of inertia and rotation. But Archimedes is not aware that he has made the step, because he has been busied with the principle of the centre of gravity, which is in fact equivalent to the principle of the lever. He would not have l] THE LEVER 9 attempted the proof, if he had not first discerned the principle directly, and the fact of experience, once discerned, has as great an authority in the general case, as in the simple. But the achievement of Archimedes is not in vain, for it brings into vivid relief the connection between the general case of unequal arms, and the special and more familiar instance, when the arms are equal ; and we derive a satisfaction from our insight into their consistency. CHAPTER II. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION AND APPLICATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF THE LEVER, 6. WHAT the early investigators learned from their own experience and that of the craftsmen, the student of to-day can only grasp with equal vividness by experimenting for himself. The Principle to be verified is this : Let AB be a light rod supported at C, and let weights, P and Q, be hung at A and B. Then for equilibrium P:Q::BC:AC, or more conveniently, Px AC=QxBC, i.e., the products of the weights by the arms at which they hang are the same. 7. Experiment 1. Take a graduated rod, say a 30-centimeter length of a meter rod, from which two scale-pans can be supported by loops of fine wire. Suppose the weight of each scale-pan is made up to 50 grams by adding lead shot. Place a 50-gram weight in each, and balance the rod over any sharp edge, such as a small metal or glass prism, on a corner of a table, so as to allow the scale-pans to hang below, one at each end, and each of them 15 cm. from the prism at the centre. Keeping one of the scales unchanged, find where the other scale must hang in order to balance about the centre, when the weight in it is increased by 20 gms. at a time up to a total weight of 250 gins. CHAP. II] THE PRINCIPLE OF THE LEVER Make a table as follows : 100 gms. (including scale) balance 100 gins, at 11 Products 140 250 !, a 2 , &c. being the observed distances from the centre of the rod at which the second scale has to be hung to secure a balance. The rod may not be quite uniform, so that c^ may not be exadtly 15 cms. But work out the products of the weights and distances on the right-hand side, and see whether they are as nearly equal as the accuracy of your method would reasonably lead you to expect. 8. Stevinus, as Archimedes 1800 years before him, is thinking always of real weights. Even when the pull is to be exerted upwards, as in supporting the rod at (7, it is applied, as his figures Fig. 4. (From Stevinus.) shew, by means of a string carried over a fixed wheel, or pulley, with the proper weight hanging from the other end. 12 MECHANICS [CHAP. If R is this sustaining weight, we may verify that R = P + Q. Experiment 2. But it is more convenient to employ a Spring Balance, which determines weights by the amount to which they can pull out a spiral spring fastened at one end. Attach such a spring balance to the centre of the rod, having first verified the readings of the balance by testing it with a set of standard weights, and made a table of errors. o Fig. 5. Repeat several of the above experiments, noting the total weight supported. Weigh the rod without the scale-pans, and subtract its weight from each of the total weights. See if the remainders are not in every case equal to the sum of the weights suspended from the rod. 9. Experiment 3. Attach a small object, such as a metal clamp, to one end of the rod, and balance it without scale-pans. The point over the edge of the prism must be the centre of gravity of the rod and clamp together, and their joint weight may be supposed to act at it. Hang a scale-pan with a known weight near the other end, and find where the whole balances. Hence calculate the weight of the rod and clamp together, and verify your result on the spring balance. 10. In these experiments any of the weights concerned may be replaced by a pull or push applied either by a spring balance, or direct muscular effort, which would just sustain the weight. In such etforts we speak of II] LEONARDO DA VINCI. THE LEVER exerting a force, and it is convenient to introduce this term at once, though the general idea of Force, as anything whicli changes or tends to change a body's state of rest or motion, belongs to Newton's time, half a century after Stevinus. 11. Our experiments shew that if two forces be applied, perpendicularly, to the ends of a rod capable of Moment of a ... Force about a turning about a fixed point, or fulcrum, they will balance provided the product of each force into the lever arm at which it acts is the same for both. In the case we have considered the lever arms are the shortest, or perpen- dicular, distances from the fulcrum to the lines of action of the forces. Leonardo da Yinci (1452 1519), the famous painter, engineer and investigator, recognized that this is the essential condition in all cases, even when the forces act obliquely. He says, for ex- ample : We have a bar AD free to rotate about A, and suspended Fig. 6. from the bar a weight P, and suspended from a string which passes over a pulley, a second weight Q. What must be the ratio of the forces that equilibrium may obtain ? The lever arm for the weight P is not AD, but the " potential " lever AB. The lever arm for the weight Q is not AD, but the "potential" lever AC. Professor Mach suggests that Leonardo may have reached this idea in some such way as this. Consider a string laid round a MECHANICS [CHAP, pulley, and subject to equal tensions on both sides. EF will be a plane of symmetry, and _ we see that equilibrium will subsist. But we also note that the only essential parts of the pulley are the two rigid radii, AB, AC, which determine the form of the motion of the points of application of the two strings. If nails were driven through the string at B and G, the rest might be cut away without disturbing equilibrium. Hence, in Fig. 6, the lever arm for the right-hand force is not AD, but the " potential " lever AC. F Fig. 7. However this may be, it was recognized that the torque, or tendency of a force to turn a body about a pivot, depended only on two things, the magnitude of the force, and the perpendicular distance from the pivot to its line of action, and that two forces had equal torques, if for each the product of the force by the perpendicular distance of its line of action from the fulcrum was the same. This product is therefore the measure of the torque, or tendency of a force to turn a body about a pivot. It is evidently high time to introduce a single word for the very important but cumbrous expression " product of a force into the perpendicular distance from the point to the line of action of the force." It is called the Moment of the force about the point. Definition. The Moment of a Force about a point is the product of the Force by the perpendicular distance of the point from the line of action of the force. We can now state the Principle of the Lever, including the case of oblique forces, as follows: Two forces acting on a lever will balance when their Moments about the fulcrum are equal and opposite. n] MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE 15 Mechanical Advantage. 12. The Lever and the other Mechanical Powers were employed to enable a small force to balance or overcome a large weight or force. In this they are said to aiford "Mechanical Advantage." The mechanical advantage is measured by the ratio of the large weight to the force required to balance it. Tradition has fixed the use of the terms Power and Weight to indicate the force employed and the resistance, whether weight, or pull, or push, overcome. This is rather unfortunate, as Power has a definite and quite different meaning in Dynamics. The mechanical advantage of the Lever, then, Weight _ Length of Power arm Power ~~ Length of Weight arm ' In the machines the weight moved is not always greater than the power. When it is less, the power is said to act at mechanical disadvantage. 13. Consider a lever with arms a, 6, weights P, Q, and sup- The different ported at the fulcrum by a force P + Q applied kinds of levers. by ft gpring Balance. It does not matter how the three forces are applied at A, B, (7, provided they have the proper P+Q G Fig. 8. magnitudes. We may therefore regard either A or B as the fulcrum, just as well as C. (1) If the fulcrum is at C, between the power and the weight, the lever is said to be of the first class, and there will be mechanical advantage or disadvantage according as a is greater or less than 6, since P x a = Q x b. 16 MECHANICS [CHAP. Fig. 9. Buckton 150-ton Testing Engine in the Laboratories of McGill University, Montreal. The V-supports, of which there are two sets for use with different scales, are seen at A. The beam is balanced when the 2000 Ib. weight B is at the extreme right. The specimen to be tested is held in jaws at C. The pull is applied to the lower end by hydraulic machinery in the room below, and the weight B is shifted by the gear-wheel D so as to keep the beam balanced. The tension at which the specimen yields, as well as continuously throughout the operation, is read on the scale. II] EXAMPLES OF LEVERS 17 Examples of levers of the first class are : Single levers. A poker (lifting the coals by resting on the bars of the grate as a fulcrum); a crowbar; the shadoof, or pole and bucket, a device used in Egypt for raising water from the Nile ; a Testing Engine. Double levers. A pair of scissors ; a pair of pincers. (2) Regard B as the fulcrum, and P + Q as the " weight " ; the power P is on the same side of the fulcrum, but farther off. The lever is of the second class, and there is always mechanical advantage. The principle of the lever still holds good, for (P + Q)xBC = PxBC+QxBC =PxBC+PxAG = Px(BC + AC) = PxAB, i.e. product of power and its arm = product of weight and its arm. Examples of levers of this class are : Single levers. The oar of a boat. (The broad blade, approximately fixed in the water, acts as fulcrum.) A door, when used to crack a nut in the hinge. Double levers. A pair of bellows. A pair of nutcrackers. (3) Regard B as the fulcrum, but P as the weight and P + Q as the power. The lever is said to be of the third class, and there is always mechanical disadvantage. As above, product of power and its arm = product of weight and its arm. Examples : Single levers. Most of the limbs of the body are of this class. Thus the forearm moves about the elbow -joint as a fulcrum. The ^power is applied (very obliquely too) by the biceps muscle. The mechanical disad- vantage is very great, and the muscles must possess great strength ; but this could not be avoided unless the human body FifT 10 were constructed so as to re- semble an animated derrick, which would be awkward for loco- motion and activity. Doable levers. A pair of sugar tongs. A pair of tweezers, c. 18 MECHANICS [CHAP. Fig. 10 a. A striking illustration of Levers of the Third Class is found in the Hydraulic Scale of the Emery Testing Engine in the Testing Laboratory of McGill University, Montreal. The pressure is conveyed from the ram of the engine to the drum above P l through copper pipes. This is applied at the knife-edge P 1 to the lever whose fulcrum wf lt The force is reduced by a series of levers of the third class, and conveyed to the central weighing lever, and the deflection of the latter is magnified by the upper lever. The weights are applied automatically by raising the four handles to the left. WHEEL AND AXLE 19 The Wheel and Axle. 14. A straight lever, working on a fixed fulcrum, can only raise the weight to a height above the fixed fulcrum equal 'to the length of the short arm. This difficulty is got over in the second of the mechanical powers, the Wheel and Axle. It consists of a wheel of large radius rigidly bolted to an axle of smaller radius. The weight is hung from a cord coiled on the axle. The power is applied to the large wheel by pulling on a cord coiled round its circumference, or by a handle projecting from its rim, as in the familiar device for raising Avater from wells. Fig. 12. It is obvious that the condition of equilibrium is the same as for the lever In fact at any given instant the radii AC, OB form a straight lever. But as each radius moves out of position, the next takes its place. The wheel and axle may therefore be regarded as a continuous lever. Another form of the wheel and axle is the Capstan, where the power is applied by handspikes, and the resemblance to a lever is still more obvious. 15. The Pulley. The simple Pulley is a wheel with grooved edge round which a cord is passed and supported at one end. The power is applied to the other end. The weight is hung from the axle of the pulley. 22 20 MECHANICS CHAP. At any instant the diameter ACB may be regarded as a lever with fulcrum at A. Hence PxAB=WxAC, __ W~AB~2' (Otherwise thus : The tension of the string must be the same on each side, or else the pulley would turn. Hence the weight is supported by two pulls applied at A and B, each equal to P. Therefore P= W/2. This is clear enough if each string is held up by a man. It makes no difference, however, if one end, instead of being held by a man, is fastened to a fixed support.) If the weight of the pulfey is too great to be neglected, let it be w. Then P = As the pulley rises, fresh diameters take the place of AB, and since the fulcrum moves, we may regard the pulley as a Travelling lever. 16. A single moveable pulley only enables us to double the systems of force at our disposal. By combining several pulleys Pulleys. we ma y increase the mechanical advantage to any extent. The following combinations are in common use, or interesting historically. (1) Archimedes' System. (Fig. 14.) By the principle of the simple pulley the tension in each string is double that of the string next above it. The weight is double the tension of the last string. Hence if there be n moveable pulleys, W x 2" = P, and PULLEYS 21 (2) The Pulley Block. (Fig. 15.) There are two blocks, each containing several pulley-wheels, or sheaves, on the same axle. The string is fastened to one of the blocks, and then carried round all the sheaves as in the figure. Fig. 14. Fig. 15. The tension of the string is the same throughout, so that the weight is supported by as many tensions each equal to the power as there are strings at the lower block. Count these, and let their number be n. Then P_ W If it be desired, allowance can be made for the weights of the pulleys as before. EXAMPLES. 1. A pump handle is 3 ft. 8 in. long, and works on a pivot 4 in. from the end attached to the pump rod. What force is applied to the pump rod when the handle is pushed down with a force of 10 Ibs. weight ? 22 MECHANICS [CHAP, n 2. A safety valve consists of a circular hole, |- inch in diameter, closed by a plunger attached to a light horizontal hinged bar one inch from the hinge. A weight of 1 Ib. slides on the bar. How far from the hinge must it be set if the steam is to blow off at 160 Ibs. on the square inch ? 3. An oarsman weighing 180 Ibs. pulls horizontally at the handle of an oar so as just to lift his weight from the seat. The stretcher against which his feet press is 16 inches below the level of his hands, and distant 2 ft. from the vertical through his centre of gravity. What is the force applied to the oar? 4. If, in example 3, the rowlock is at one-quarter of the distance from the hands to the blade of the oar in the water, what propelling force could eight such oarsmen apply to the boat ? 5. Six men work a capstan using handspikes projecting 5 ft. 3 in. from the centre. The barrel on which the rope is coiled is 2 ft. 3 in. in diameter. What force must each man exert in order to raise a weight of a ton and a half ? 6. The rope of the simple pulley, Fig. 13, is carried over a fixed pulley and held by a man who supports himself by standing in the hook attached to the moveable pulley. What is the pull on the rope if the man weighs 180 Ibs. ? 7. If there are four pulleys in the system of Archimedes, what force is required to support a weight of 2 cwt. (1) when the weight of the pulleys is neglected, (2) when each pulley weighs 8 Ibs. ? CHAPTER IIL THE CENTRE OF GRAVITY. 17. THE principle of the lever shews us that two weights rigidly attached to a light rod will balance if their moments about the fulcrum are equal and opposite, and that the fulcrum must be supported by a force equal to the sum of the weights. This principle may be generalised in two ways. (1) Let another pair of weights be attached to the same rod. Then if their moments about the fulcrum are equal and opposite, they also will balance. It is a fact of experience that the presence of the one pair in no way interferes with the equilibrium of the other. The same is true for any number of pairs. A' P \ Fig. 16. Hence any number of weights at different distances on a rod will balance provided that the sum of the moments on one side 24 MECHANICS [CHAP. of the fulcrum is equal to the sum of the moments on the other side. (2) The rod may be turned through any angle about the fulcrum, and yet equilibrium will subsist. For by similar triangles OA' CA Q_CA_ CA' P~ GB~ CB" PxCB'=QxCA', and the moments are still equal. A rod so weighted that the sum of the moments on each side of the fulcrum is the same may be said to be statically symmetrical about the fulcrum. It is clear that there may be as many such rods as we choose, all rigidly joined at the fulcrum, and yet the whole system will balance in any position about it. Now the objects with which we deal in Mechanics consist of innumerable small parts, or particles, rigidly joined together and each possessing its own weight. Mechanical problems will be enormously simplified if we can find for any object the point about which it is statically symmetrical. For if this be supported by a force equal to the total weight of the object, equilibrium will subsist, since the object will certainly balance about this point. For many purposes we need no longer consider the myriads of small weights, but replace them by a single weight at this point. Hence the point is called the Centre of Gravity of the object. Definition. The Centre of Gravity of a body is the point about which it will balance in all positions. Two things should be noted : (1) It is not sufficient that there should be statical symmetry in one direction, say right and left. A vertical rod will remain at rest however the weights are distributed on it, even though all of them should be above the fulcrum. For since all the perpendiculars from the fulcrum on the vertical lines of action of the weights are zero, the moments on each Ill] THE CENTRE OF GRAVITY 25 side of the fulcrum are zero, and there is statical symmetry horizon tally, but not vertically. But if the rod be turned ever so slightly from the vertical, equilibrium is at once destroyed. If an object be found to balance about a point in more than one position, then it will balance in all positions, and the point of support must be the centre of gravity. (2) There cannot be two centres of gravity for the same body, for if the body were turned so that the line joining the two centres was horizontal, the moments to the left and right could not be equal for both points at the same time. 18. Experiment. Find experimentally the centre of gravity of a flat board. Bore two small holes near the rim, and suspend the board from a knitting-needle passed through one of them at A. Hang from the needle a plumb- line which has been rubbed with chalk. By plucking the line and letting it spring back a chalk line may be traced on the board. Repeat the process using the other hole B. The intersection of the traces is the centre of gravity. 19. The centre of gravity can be found by inspection whenever we can discern a point about which the object is symmetrical in all direc- tions. This was the method adopted by Archimedes in his proof of the Principle of the Lever. ( 2 3.) It will now be clear, as observed at the time, that the Principle of the Centre of Gravity is nothing but the Principle of the Lever in its most general form. The rest of his treatise is devoted to finding the centres of gravity of some of the more familiar geometrical figures. 26 MECHANICS [CHAP. Thus, the C.G. of a straight line is its middle point, for it may be divided into pairs of particles equidistant from the centre on opposite sides. The C.G. of a circle or of a f~~ ~7 sphere is its centre. / / A parallelogram may be di- G / vided into strips parallel to one / side, AB, each of which is bi- /. sected by EF joining the middle D points of AB, CD. The C.G. therefore lies in EF. Similarly, it lies in GH. There- fore it is K. 20. To find the centre of gravity of a triangle, ABC. A Fig. 18. B D O Fig. 19. Bisect the base in D, and join AD. Divide the triangle into small strips, such as bdc parallel to the base BDC. Then each strip is bisected, for by similar triangles bd Ad dc Ill] THE CENTRE OF GRAVITY 27 But BD = DC. Therefore bd = dc. Hence the c.G. of each strip, and therefore of the whole triangle, lies in AD. Similarly, it lies in BE, if E is the middle point of AC. .'. it is the point G. Join DE. Then since CB, CA are bisected in D and E, DE is parallel to AB, and we have by similar triangles GD_DE_DC_l GA~AB~ BG~2' The C.G. of the triangle is therefore on the line joining the middle point of the base to the vertex, at one-third of its length from the lower end. 21. To find the c.G. of any number of weights spaced out along a straight line. I I 1 It's > M! + W 2 Fig. 20. f If the C.G. were supported by a force equal to the sum of the weights, the whole would remain at rest ; and this would not be altered if the rod were produced and fixed at any point, say 0. But the rod would turn about unless the moments of the separate weights about were equal to the moment of the supporting force in the opposite direction. /. (w 1 + w 2 + ...)x OG = iv 1 x OA+w 2 xOB+... W l + W 2 + . . . Rule. Hence the distance of the c.G. to the right of the vertical through any point is found by dividing the sum of the products of each weight by its distance from this vertical by the sum of all the weights. 28 MECHANICS [CHAP. Very often an object has a line of symmetry, and consists of portions with known centres of gravity spaced out along this line. It is then easy to find its C.G. by the above rule. Since the object may be turned so as to have any line within it vertical, the same rule will give the distance of the C.G. from any line we choose. The C.G. of a flat body of any shape may thus be fixed by finding its distance from two chosen lines at right angles to each other. 22. One point of support. If an object is supported at one point, it will be in equilibrium Equilibrium so l n g as ^s C.G. is in the vertical line through under Gravity. foe point of support. For since its weight then acts through the point of support, there is no moment tending to turn it about that point. But the nature of the equilibrium differs greatly according to the position of the C.G. G' \ Pendulum in Billiard Cue in Stable Equilibrium. Unstable Equilibrium. Fig. 21. Ill] THE CENTRE OF GRAVITY 29 (1) Stable Equilibrium. If the c.G. 'is below the point of support, and the body be accidentally disturbed, the moment of the weight tends to bring it back to its position of rest, and equilibrium is restored. In this case the object is said to be in Stable Equilibrium. (2) Unstable Equilibrium. If the C.G. is above the point of support, and can descend when the object is disturbed, the moment of the weight tends to turn the object still farther from the position of rest, so that on the occurrence of any accidental disturbance equilibrium is destroyed. This is called Unstable Equilibrium. (3) Neutral Equilibrium. If the C.G. is at the fixed point of support, the object will rest in any position. Such equilibrium is called Neutral Equilibrium. It occurs also when the point of support is moveable so that the C.G. remains always at the same height above it, as when a sphere or cylinder rests upon a horizontal plane. 23. Objects standing upon a base will be in equilibrium so long as the vertical through the C.G. falls within Extended Base. the contour of the base. (If the base has pro- jecting points and retreating bays, the contour is to be drawn from point to point, and not to follow the inner curve of the ., bays.) For then the upward pressures from the base can arrange themselves so as to meet and balance the weight acting vertically through the C.G. The gesticulations of a person walking along a narrow plank are instinctive efforts to bring back (by shooting out an arm or a leg) the C.G. of the body to the vertical over the line joining the feet. The tight- rope dancer aids himself by a balancing pole heavily weighted at each end. A slight motion of the pole and weights suffices to move the C.G. as much as a violent movement of the limb, and thus awkward and inelegant gyrations are avoided. 24. In bicycle riding the greater part of the B'-l balancing depends on this principle, though some help for steadiness is derived from two dynamical Q i considerations to be mentioned later (8 70, 77). Fig. 22. 30 MECHANICS [CHAP. Let AB be the ground contacts of the front and back wheels, seen from above ; G the C.G. of machine and rider. If G moves off the base line AB, say to the right, the rider at once feels that he is falling over on that side. By turning the front wheel towards the side on which he is falling, he brings A to A', while B follows along BA to B' } and the base is again beneath the C.G. Hence the rule, so contrary to the beginner's instincts, that the wheel must be turned towards the side on which the rider is falling. EXAMPLES. 1. Shew that the centre of gravity of a triangle is the same as that of three equal weights placed at its corners. 2. From a body of weight W and centre of gravity G a portion is cut away whose weight is W and centre of gravity G'. Shew that the centre of W gravity of the remainder is G" t onG'G produced, where G"G= G 'G. 3. Weights of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 Ibs. are spaced out along a straight line at equal distances of one foot. Find their centre of gravity. 4. A figure is formed of a square of side a and an isosceles triangle described on one of the sides as base. Find the altitude of the triangle in order that the figure may balance about that side. 5. A sphere of 6 inches radius has a hollow spherical cavity of 2 inches radius, midway between the centre and the surface. Find the distance of the C.G. from the centre. 6. Where must a circular hole 2 inches in diameter be punched out of a circular plate 5 inches in diameter in order that the distance of the C.G. from the centre may be half an inch ? 7. The mass of the moon is '01137 times that of the earth. Taking the earth's radius at 3963 miles and the distance of the moon from the earth's centre at 60'27 radii of the earth, find the c.G. of the earth and moon. 8. Shew that the C.G. of a pyramid on a triangular base is in the line joining the vertex to the c.G. of the base at one-quarter of its length from the C.G. of the base. (Consider slices parallel to the base and proceed as in 20.) Ill] THE CENTRE OF GRAVITY 31 9. A cylindrical tin can (without lid) 8 inches in diameter and one foot high, is half filled with water. Find the c.G. of the can and the water, if the weight of the can is one-quarter of that of the water. 10. A rod balances about a point one-quarter of its length from one end. If a weight of 2 Ibs. is attached to the thin end, the balancing point is shifted 8 inches towards that end ; whereas 8 Ibs. must be attached to the thick end to shift it the same amount in the other direction. Find the weight and length of the rod. CHAPTER IV. THE BALANCE. 25. ONE of the most important cases of the Lever is the Balance. In principle it is only a lever with equal arms. If two weights placed at their extremities balance each other, they must be equal. Fig. 23, Let AB be the beam of the balance, supported at its middle point C. Let AC = CB = l\ let P and Q be the weights to be compared ; W the weight of the beam itself, which will act at its centre of gravity G. We. shall suppose that G is at a distance h below C when the beam is horizontal. Consider what would happen if G were (1) above C, (2) exactly at C. ( 22.) CHAP. IV] THE BALANCE 33 If the beam comes to rest at an angle 6 with the horizon, we have by the principle of the lever P x AD = Q x BE+ W x GF, P Jcos0 = Jcos<9+ If the weights are equal, 6 0, and the beam is horizontal. 26. A balance is sai(J to have great sensitiveness when a very small difference of weights causes a great deflection. To construct a sensitive balance, we must make I large, and W and h small, i.e. (1) the beam must be long; (2) the beam must be light ; (3) the centre of gravity of the beam must be very near (but not at) the point of support. Besides these three requisites the mechanician has also to arrange, (4) that C shall be exactly on the line AB (for if it is above or below, the sensitiveness will be different for different loads. Ex. 8); (5) that there shall be as little friction as possible at the points where the beam and the weights are supported (for friction would hinder the free turning of the beam, and perhaps cause the weights not to hang exactly in the vertical through the points of support) ; (6) that the time of swing shall not be too great. The conditions for this last requisite will be understood later ( 270), but they cannot be satisfied consistently with (1) and (3). Hence a compromise must be effected. Where accuracy is all- important (6) must be given up, and weighing will occupy much time. For rapid, but rough, weighing (1) and (3) are sacrificed. 27. Fig. 24 represents a 16-inch Oertling Balance. The metal beam is constructed like a girder so as to combine lightness with great rigidity. The point of support is a knife- edge of polished agate projecting downwards at the centre and resting on an agate plane. Two other agate knife-edges project upwards at the ends of the beam, and on these rest agate planes c. 3 MECHANICS [CHAP. from which the scale-pans are hung. Above the centre of the beam may be seen the gravity bob, a small brass weight which moves up and down on a fine screw. By means of it the centre of gravity may be raised or lowered very gradually, and can be adjusted so as to be sometimes not more than one thousandth of an inch below the knife-edge supporting the beam. A small vane, or flag, is also seen, which may be turned to the right or left so as to correct slight deviations from the horizontal when the beam is unloaded. Fig. 24. A long pointer, attached at right angles to the centre of the beam, moves over the divisions of an ivory scale at the foot of the pillar, and should point to zero when the beam is horizontal. To protect the agate edges from injury while the weights are IV] THE BALANCE 35 being changed, and from unnecessary wear and tear, a supporting framework can be raised (by turning the knob A) so as to gently lift the beam off the agate plane on which it rests, and the bars supporting the scale-pans off their knife-edges. The beam between the central knife-edge and one or both of those at its ends is graduated into ten equal parts, and each of these has again ten divisions. By a lever worked from outside the case a small " rider " (fl ) of platinum wire, weighing one centi- gram, can be placed on any division of the beam. The case protects the balance from disturbance by air currents during the final stages of the weighing. It rests upon four levelling screws, and is provided with two spirit levels at right angles to each other. 28. With a properly constructed and well adjusted balance use of the it is for most purposes enough to proceed as Balance. follows. Lower the supports by gently turning the knob till the beam is free, and see whether the pointer rests at zero, or swings to equal distances on each side of it, when the pans are empty. Raise the supports again, and place the object to be weighed in one scale-pan, and weights in the other. A slight turn of the knob will shew which way the pointer begins to move, and after again supporting the beam, weights must be added or subtracted till, when the beam is set free, the pointer swings slowly back- wards and forwards within the limits of the scale. The case may then be closed, and the "rider" placed on the beam, and shifted till the pointer rests at zero, or swings equally on both sides of it. The beam must be brought to rest on the supports every time the rider is to be moved. The weights in the scale-pan are then recorded before any of them are removed, and allowance made for the rider as follows. The rider weighs 10 milligrams. If it is placed over the division marked 7, for instance, it will balance a weight of 7 milligrams placed in the other scale, (which hangs at division 10 on the other arm), by the principle of the lever, for 10x7 = 7 x 10. Since each division of the beam is subdivided into tenths and 32 36 MECHANICS [CHAP. we can estimate tenths of one of the subdivisions, we have the means of reading to hundredths of a milligram. 29. But if such accuracy as this is desired, it is better to proceed by what is known as the Method of Oscillations. We do not wait for the beam to come to rest, but calculate the point at which it will stop in course of time by observing the oscillations of the pointer on the scale. Suppose the scale has 10 divisions on each side of the zero, and we read the turning points to tenths of a division for three successive swings thus: Left Eight 7-3 6-2 7-1 The mean of the two readings on the right is 7*2 ; and the 6'2 + 7*2 mean of this with the reading on the left is = *5. 2i This is where the pointer would come to rest if left to itself for a quarter of an hour. It would not be right to take the mean of one observation on each side. For the swings are gradually decreasing, and we ought to compare with the single swing on the left, 6' 2, such a swing to the right as would have been made at the same stage of their decay. The vibrations decay very regularly, so that the mean between the two swings on the right will represent what a right- hand swing would have been, had it been made at the moment when the pointer was actually swinging 6 '2 divisions to the left. We may with advantage observe more than three swings, but there must always be one more swing on one side than on the other. Using this method we determine : (1) the position of rest with the pans empty. This may be called the true zero reading ; (2) the reading when weights and rider are adjusted to the nearest whole milligram less than the object ; (3) the reading when the rider is shifted to increase the weight by one milligram. IVJ THE BALANCE 37 Thus let the readings be: (1) Pans unloaded (true zero) + '5, (2) With object and weights 36*324 gms. ... - 4'2, (3) 36-325 gms. ... +8'6. The addition of 1 mgm. makes a difference of 12'8 divisions. This measures the sensitiveness of the balance for the given load. To bring the pointer from position (2) to the true zero a difference of 4*7 divisions must be effected, and hence a weight of 4'7/12'8 mgms., i.e. "37 mgms., must be added. The true weight is therefore 36'32437 gms. 30. Such perfection has been attained in the construction of balances that a difference of one milligram may be detected in a load of one kilogram, i.e. one part in a million. In a first-class balance the arms may be so nearly equal in length as not to differ by one part in 50,000 ; the knife-edges so keen as to be less than one two-hundred thousandth of an inch wide ; and the centre of gravity may be less than one-thousandth of an inch below the point of support. Such instruments demand great care in handling, and the following precautions should be strictly observed by those who use them. (1) No one should alter any of the adjustments except those responsible for the care of the instrument. Precautions. (2) No change in the object, weights, or position of the rider should be made, nor must the scale-pans or any part of the swinging system be touched except after the beam has been arrested by turning the milled knob. (3) The knob should be turned gently, and so as to arrest the beam as nearly as possible at the middle of the swing. The great object is to avoid the smallest jerk or jar, as these are likely to injure the agate knife-edges. (4) The weights must not be touched except with the pliers provided for the purpose. 31. The chief source of error in an accurate weighing, so far as the balance itself is concerned, is a slight difference in the lengths of the arms. This error may be avoided in two ways. 38 MECHANICS [CHAP. (1) Borda's method consists in counterpoising the object by weights, small shot, fine sand, or thin paper; and then substituting standard weights for the object till they exactly balance the counterpoise. It is clear that the arms need not be equal in this method. (2) Gauss devised the method of weighing the object in each scale successively. Let a, b be the lengths of the arms ; W 1} W 2 the apparent Fig. 25. OF FO IV] THE BALANCE 39 weights when the object hangs at a and b respectively; W the real weight. Then by the principle of the lever W x a = W l x b and W =JW 1 . W,. Since TTj and TF 2 are very nearly equal, it is generally accurate enough to take the arithmetical mean instead of the geometric mean. 32. As an instance of a balance for rough but rapid weighing we may take the common steelyard, to be found The steelyard. * at any railway station. A platform is hung from the short end of a balance, very near the fulcrum. Heavy weights can be hung on a hook at the end of the long graduated arm, and a small rider slides on the latter, as in the fine balance just described. It is evident that the divisions can be adjusted so as to read in any units that may be desired. EXAMPLES. 1. A balance is horizontal when unloaded. But an object weighs 20'4 gms. in one scale and 20'8 gms. in the other. What is the matter with the balance and what is the true weight ? 2. An object weighs 12 and 14 gms. respectively in the two scales of a balance. What is the error if its weight is taken as 13 gms. ? 3. The pans of a balance are not quite of the same weight, but the arms are equal. Shew that the weight of an object which appears to weigh W^ "W -4- "W and W 2 in the two scales is ^ - ; and that the difference of the weights of the pans is -^ - . 4. A body whose weight is 12 Ibs. appears, in one scale of a balance, to weigh 12 Ibs. 6 oz. Find its apparent weight in the other scale. 40 MECHANICS [CHAP. IV 5. One arm of a balance is 9 inches long and the other 10 inches. Shew that if the seller puts the substance to be weighed as often in one scale as in the other, he loses f / on his transactions. 6. In a balance with unequal arms P appears to weigh Q, and Q appears to weigh R ; what does R appear to weigh ? 7. The beam of a balance is 18 inches long, and an object appears to weigh 20-34 gins, in one pan, and 20*87 gms. in the other. How much must the fulcrum be shifted to make the balance true ? 8. In a balance the distance between the knife-edges supporting the scale-pans is 21. The central knife-edge is at a perpendicular distance x above the middle point of this line, and the centre of gravity is distant h below the central knife-edge. If weights w 19 w 2 are placed in the pans, and w be the weight of the balance, shew that the beam will come to rest at an angle 6 with the horizon, where . h Hence shew that the sensitiveness decreases as the loads increase. CHAPTER V. STEVINUS OF BRUGES THE PRINCIPLE OF THE INCLINED PLANE. "Wonder en is gheen wonder." 33. THREE of the Mechanical Powers remain to be considered, viz., the Inclined Plane; the Wedge, or Double Inclined Plane; and the Screw, which consists of an inclined plane wrapped round a cylinder, and may be regarded as a Travelling Inclined Plane. From the time of Archimedes nothing of importance was effected in Mechanical theory for nearly two thousand years, when Simon Stevin of Bruges (1548 1620) established the principle of the Inclined Plane. His discovery constitutes the second step in the historical development of Mechanics. Its importance, and the beautiful ingenuity of the proof, make it worth while to study the proof in his own words. Stevin not only built upon this foundation the theory of pulleys and the lever, and many propositions of modern Mechanics, but applied his knowledge to practical questions such as, for instance, the design of the machines by which the Dutch fisher- men hauled their boats above high-water mark; the best form of bit for the management of horses (at the request of Maurice of Nassau, Prince of Orange) ; and the art of fortification. Readers of Tristram Shandy will remember that his work was Uncle Toby's constant companion. 34. The problem to be solved was this. A body resting upon a horizontal plane requires no force to MECHANICS [CHAP. support it. Let it be attached by a string to some point in the plane, and let the plane be tilted till it becomes vertical, so that the body hangs freely by the string. The tension of the string must now be equal to the full weight of the body. In the inter- mediate positions the tension will be something between the weight of the body and zero. What is the law connecting the tension and the weight for any given slope of the plane ? That is the principle to be discovered. 35. Here is Stevin's solution, arrayed in all the elaborate stevin's Prin- forms of a proposition of Euclid. (Elements of ciple - Statics, Book I. Proposition xix.) If a triangle has its plane perpendicular to the horizon, and its base parallel to it; and on each of the two other sides a spherical mass of equal weight ; the power of the left-hand weight shall be to the power of the right-hand weight as the right side is to the left side. Fig. 26. M Fig. 27. (From Stevinus.) V] STEVINUS. THE INCLINED PLANE 43 Given. Let ABC be a triangle, having its plane perpendicular to the horizon, and its base AC parallel to the horizon , and let there be on the side AB (which is double of BC) a globe D, and on BC another E, equal in weight and magnitude. Required. To prove that as the side AB (2) is to the side BC (1), so is the power of the weight E to that of D. Preparation. Let there be fitted round the triangle a circuit of fourteen globes, equal in weight and size, and equidistant, as D, E, F, G, H y /, K, L, M, N, 0, P, Q, R, threaded on a cord passing through their centres, so that they can turn on the said centres, and that there may be two globes on the side BC y and four on AB; and thus as line is to line, so the number of globes to the number of globes ; let there be three fixed points at S, T y F, over which the cord can slip, and let the two parts above the triangle be parallel to its sides AB, BC\ so that the whole can turn freely and without hindrance on the said sides AB, BC. If the power of the weights D, R, Q, P, be not equal to the power of the two globes E, F, the one side will be Demonstration . . more powerful than the other. If it be possible, let the four D, R, Q, P, be more powerful than the two E, F\ but the four 0, N, M, L, are equal to the four G, H, I, K ; wherefore the side of the eight globes D, R, Q, P, 0, N, M, L, will be more powerful in consequence of their arrangement than the six, E, F, G, H, I, K, and since the heavier side overcomes the lighter, the eight globes will descend and the other six will rise. Let it be so, and let D arrive where is at present, and so for all the others; viz. let E, F, G, H, arrive where P, Q, R, D are now, and 7, K, where E, F are. Nevertheless the circuit of globes will have the same configuration as before, and for the same reason the eight globes will have the advantage in weight and in falling will cause eight others to come into their places, and so this movement will have no end, which is absurd. The proof will be the same for the other side. Therefore the part of the circuit, D, R, Q, P, 0, N, M, L, will be in equilibrium with the part, E, F, G, H, /, K. Take away from the two sides the weights which are equal and 44 MECHANICS [CHAP. similarly situated, as are the four globes, 0, N t M, L, on the one part, and the four, G, H t I, K y on the other part. The remaining four, D, R, Q, P, will be, and will remain, in equilibrium with the two, E, F. Wherefore E will have double the power of D. As the side BA (2) is to the side EG (1), so is the power of E to the power of D. A c A c Fig. 28. Fig. 29. Corollary 1. Let ABC be a triangle as before, and AB double of BC; and let D, a globe on AB, be double of E on EC. It appears that D, E will be in equilibrium. Wherefore as A B is to BC, so is the globe D to the globe E. Corollary 2. Let now one of the sides of the triangle, as BC (which is half of AB), be perpendicular to AC. The globe D, which is double of E, will still be in equilibrium with E. For as the side A B is to BC, so is the globe D to the globe E. In the last corollary the tension of the string supporting D on the inclined plane is evidently equal to the weight of E hanging freely. Thus the principle is reached that the force required to support a body resting on an inclined plane is to the weight of the body as the height of the plane is to its length (along the slope). 36. Before going farther the student should immediately test Experimental this important principle for himself, verification. Experiment. With the apparatus figured, or some simpler arrangement, make a series of observations with STEVINUS. THE INCLINED PLANE 45 different slopes and different weights and verify that in every case P _ Height of Plane W "Length of Plane where a is the inclination of the inclined plane to the horizontal. sin a, Fig. 30. 37. In all probability the student, especially if familiar with criticism of mathematical demonstrations, will feel a curious stevin's Proof. sudden enlightenment, and intensity of conviction on first grasping the point of Stevin's proof, far more than he will derive from the results of his direct experiments, which will give only approximate values owing to the effects of friction and the difficulty of all exact measurements. How is this ? Do the truths of science rest after all on a priori reasoning, rather than 46 MECHANICS [CHAP. on observation and experience? The following remarks of Professor Mach on this point are so instructive that I venture to quote them in full ; they should be carefully studied. "Unquestionably in the assumption from which Stevinus starts, that the endless chain does not move, there is contained primarily only a purely instinctive cognition. He feels at once, and we with him, that we have never observed anything like a motion of the kind referred to, that a thing of such a character does not exist. This conviction has so much logical cogency that we accept the conclusion drawn from it respecting the law of equilibrium on the inclined plane without the thought of an objection, although the law if presented as the simple result of experiment, or otherwise put, would appear dubious. We cannot be surprised at this when we reflect that all results of experiment are obscured by adventitious circumstances (as friction, &c.), and that every conjecture as to the conditions which are determinative in a given case is liable to error. That Stevinus ascribes to instinctive knowledge of this sort a higher authority than to simple, manifest, direct observation might excite in us astonishment if we did not ourselves possess the same inclination. The question accordingly forces itself upon us: Whence does this higher authority come ? If we remember that scientific demonstration, and scientific criticism generally, can only have sprung from the consciousness of the individual fallibility of investigators, the explanation is not far to seek. We feel clearly that we ourselves have contributed nothing to the creation of instinctive knowledge, that we have added to it nothing arbitrarily, but that it exists in absolute independence of. our participation. Our mistrust of our own subjective interpretation of the facts observed, is thus dissipated." " Stevinus' deduction is one of the rarest fossil indications that we possess in the primitive history of Mechanics, and throws a wonderful light on the process of the formation of science generally, on its rise from instinctive knowledge. We will recall to mind that Archimedes pursued exactly the same tendency as Stevinus, only with much less good fortune. In later times, also, instinctive knowledge is very frequently taken as the starting point of investigations. Every experimenter can daily observe in himself y] STEVINUS. THE INCLINED PLANE 47 the guidance that instinctive knowledge furnishes him. If he succeed in abstractly formulating what is contained in it, he will as a rule have made an important advance in science." " Stevinus' procedure is no error. If an error were contained in it, we should all share it. Indeed, it is perfectly certain that the union of the strongest instinct with the greatest power of abstract formulation alone constitutes the great natural enquirer." (Mach, The Science of Mechanics. Translation by Thomas J. McCormack, p. 26.) And again: "The reasoning of Stevinus impresses us as so highly ingenious, because the result at which he arrives apparently contains more than the assumption from which he starts. If Stevinus had distinctly set forth the entire fact in all its aspects, as Galileo subsequently did, his reasoning would no longer strike us as ingenious; but we should have obtained a much more satisfactory and clear insight into the matter." We shall see later how Galileo regarded this principle. EXAMPLES. 1. A train of 200 tons weight rests on an incline of 1 in 80. There is a resistance to motion due to friction equivalent to an opposing force of 16 Ibs. per ton weight. What force is required (1) to prevent the train from running down hill, (2) just to set it in motion up hill ? 2. To pull a waggon up a certain hill the horse has to exert a force equal to the weight of 480 Ibs., one quarter of his effort being employed in over- coming friction. If he zig-zags so as to increase the distance travelled by one-third, what force must he exert, supposing friction to be the same as before ? 3. Two inclined planes of equal altitude 4 feet, but bases 3 feet and 5 feet respectively, are placed back to back, and two weights connected by a smooth string are balanced across the top, one on each incline. Compare the weights. CHAPTER VI. THE PARALLELOGRAM OF FORCES. 38. IN the case of the Inclined Plane considered by Stevinus there are three forces acting on the sustained weight: (1) its weight pulling vertically downwards, (2) the pull of the string along the slope of the plane, (3) the support of the plane itself. This last force can be nothing but a thrust, or pressure, at right angles to the plane ; for the plane is supposed to be smooth, i.e. incapable of exerting any sideway reaction on objects in contact with it, of the nature of resistance to slip. Stevinus not only discovered the relation between the tension and the weight, when it was sustained on the inclined plane ; but he perceived that the relation between these three forces must be the same, if they are to balance each other, however they are produced, provided that the form of the machine's motion, i.e. the directions of the forces, remains the same. B C Fig. 31. (From Mach's Mechanik.) CHAP. Vl] THE PARALLELOGRAM OF FORCES 49 For instance, the thrust R might just as well be replaced by the tension of a string perpendicular to the plane, carried over a fixed pulley at D, and supporting a weight R. The plane may now be removed, and there is left a so-called " Funicular Machine." Fig. 32. Draw the vertical through a, and take any length db to represent the weight W. From b draw be perpendicular to AB. Then by Stevinus' Principle, __ _ W~ AB~ ab' by similar triangles. But there is no reason why the function of the two strings should not be interchanged, and R be supposed to support W on a plane DaE, whose reaction is the force P. In this case _R_ad W~ ab' Hence the two forces P and R, which together balance W, are represented by ac and ad, when W is represented by ab in magnitude, but of course in the reversed direction. The line ab must therefore represent the single force which is equivalent to, i.e. has the same effect as, P and R acting together, since they just balance W acting downwards. c. 4 50 MECHANICS [CHAP. Stevinus was thus led to a special case (when the two forces are at right angles) of a very important proposition, the Parallelo- gram of Forces, which may be stated as follows : If two forces acting at a point are represented in magnitude and direction by two straight lines, they are together equivalent to a single force, represented by that diagonal of the parallelogram constructed on the two straight lines which passes through the point. This proposition, though employed by Stevinus, was first explicitly stated by Newton as a corollary to the Second Law of Motion. It is the starting point of the modern treatment of Statics. 39. Experiment. A direct experimental proof of the Paral- lelogram of Forces is easily arranged. Fig. 33. VI] THE PARALLELOGRAM OF FORCES 51 Three strings are knotted together, and provided with hooks at the other ends. Two of them pass over light pulleys and have weights attached ; the third hangs vertically, supporting a weight. The directions of the strings, when equilibrium is attained, can be traced on a drawing board held behind them. The trace of the vertical string is produced upwards, and from any point in it parallels to the other strings are drawn. It will be found that the sides and vertical diagonal of the parallelogram so constructed are always proportional to the weights hanging from the strings respectively parallel to them. We shall defer the development of the consequences of this proposition till after it has been deduced from the Laws of Motion. 42 CHAPTER VIL THE PEINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK. 40. MECHANICAL problems, and especially the simple machines, may be regarded from another point of view. It was first noted by Stevinus in the case of the pulleys. When a weight is raised by means of a cord passing over a single fixed pulley, the "Power" must be equal to the weight, and it descends exactly as much as the weight rises. By employing a single moveable pulley the weight can be raised with half the Power (15); but the cord to which the power is attached must be pulled through twice the height the weight rises. If pulley-blocks are used, with n strings to the lower block, the force employed need only be one-nth part of the weight ( 16), but since each of the n strings must be shortened as much as the weight rises, the end of the power string must move n times as far as the weight is lifted. Stevinus saw that this principle applied to all machines, and embodied it in his phrase : " Ut spatium agentis ad spatium patientis, sic potentia patientis ad potentiam agentis." In other words, " What is gained in power is lost in speed." 'So that the product of the force exerted and the distance moved through is the same for the Power as for the Weight. Stevinus shewed how to employ this principle so as to find the relation between the power and the weight for complicated machines. Even when the .construction is unknown, it may be used. Imagine (Fig. 33 a) the two handles A and B to be CHAP. VII] THE PRINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK 53 connected by any system of mechanism (levers, pulleys, wheel- work, &c.) enclosed in a box. To find what force will be exerted by B when a given force is applied to A, all that is necessary is to observe how far B moves for a given movement of A. Then the ratio of the force exerted at B to the force applied at A is the same as the ratio of the distance moved by A to the distance moved by B. Fig. 33 a. 41. This was the way in which Galileo regarded the Inclined Plane. He was much occupied with the descent of falling bodies, and was very sure that heavy bodies never rose of their own accord, but settled down under gravity to the lowest place they could reach. If, then, no motion took place on the Inclined Plane, it must be for the reason that, were the weights to get into motion, there could be no rise or fall of weights on the whole. But when two or more weights are concerned, some rising and some falling, how are we to take into account a large weight rising through a small distance, and perhaps obliquely, as compared with a small weight falling through a large distance ? Galileo saw that the essential factors were the weight concerned and the vertical distance through which it rose or fell ; and that we should carry to our account the product of the two. Thus (Fig. 31) if W is raised from the bottom to the top of the plane AB, it rises a vertical height AC, while the Power- weight descends a length equal to AB. Hence, that there may be no rise or fall of weights on the whole, Px AB=WxAC, P AC W~AB' or 42. Of course Galileo could only have seen that the vertical heights were the essential factors from instinctive knowledge based 54 MECHANICS [CHAP on experience ; and the principle could only be finally established by careful comparison with experience according to the canons of logic (v. 118). " Galileo's conception of the Inclined Plane strikes us as much less ingenious than that of Stevinus, but we recognize it as more natural and more profound *." When we realize it, we suddenly perceive how the ratio of the forces in the case of the inclined plane fits in with our general experience that heavy bodies settle downwards as far as they can. "The equilibrium equation of the principle may be reduced in every case to the trivial statement, that when nothing can happen nothing does happen*." " The principle, like every general principle, brings with it, by the insight which it furnishes, disillusionment as well as elucidation. It brings with it disillusionment to the extent that we recognize in it facts which were long before known and even instinctively perceived, our present recognition being simply more distinct and more definite ; and elucidation, in that it enables us to see every- where throughout the most complicated relations the same simple facts*." 43. Torricelli (1608 1647) gave the principle a more general form by employing the notion of the Centre of Gravity. Let there be a number of weights, P 1? P 2 , &c. connected by mechanism ; and let their heights above a line of reference Ox be h, /& 2 , &c. Then the height of the centre of gravity is, (21) , PA+PA+... P.+P.+... Let the machine work for a moment so that the heights of the weights become hf t h z ' } etc. The new height of the centre of gravity is: The centre of gravity will have fallen a distance , ,, A (A - A/) + p 2 (/* 2 -/*;) + ... P 1+ p,+... * Mach, Mechanik. VIl] THE PRINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK 55 If such a fall is possible, it will certainly take place. If therefore the machine is in equilibrium, it must be because the centre of gravity of the weights attached to it cannot descend, and thus i.e. the sum of the products of the weights into their vertical displacements when motion takes place must be zero. 44. In a letter to Varignon written in 1717 John Bernoulli Generalization shewed how to extend the principle to all cases of the Principle. of equilibrium. Let any number of forces act in any directions at any points. Imagine the points to receive any infinitely small displacements compatible with their mechanical connections. Multiply each force by so much of the displacement of its point of application as takes places along the direction of the force, counting the product positive if the displacement occurs in the same sense as the force, and negative if in the opposite sense. Then in order that there may be equilibrium the sum of all these products must be equal to zero. 45. We can simplify this statement by introducing the very important term Work. Work. In common language any fatiguing exertion is called work. Lifting weights is a simple and familiar example. Consider a number of labourers engaged in carrying bricks, mortar, &c., up vertical ladders to the different floors of a building in course of construction. The amount of work done by any one man depends on two things : (1) the weight of bricks lifted ; (2) the vertical height to which they are raised ; for it is clear that the man who lifts twice the weight of bricks to the same storey as another man, or the same weight to twice the height, will have done twice as much work. And it depends on these two things only. It does not depend on the time taken to do it. One man may work steadily, but slowly : another may take frequent intervals for rest and refresh- ment, and then work furiously. The foreman need not watch 56 MECHANICS [CHAP. them ; he can measure the work by the piece, i.e. by noting the weight raised and the height to which it is carried. Nor does it depend on the path by which the bricks are carried. One man may take them up a vertical ladder, by a dead lift through a short distance; another may arrange a series of sloping planks, and arrive with little effort, but after a long walk. The effective result, the work done, is the same if the same weight is raised to the same height. Work, then, results from two factors, force exerted, and distance through which it moves its object. Both must be forthcoming for work to be done. Neither is sufficient alone. Great forces are often exerted without doing any work in the scientific sense. The piers of a bridge exert a great upward thrust, but do no work, though they serve a useful end, for they prevent gravity from doing work, and so bringing the bridge to the ground. 46. If the object moves, but not along the direction of the force, only so much of the displacement is to be reckoned as takes place along that direction, just as at football it may often be advisable to run with the ball obliquely, but the effective value of the run is estimated by the yards gained in the direct line between goals. Fig. 34. Let a curtain ring be pulled with force P by a cord at right angles to the rod. No effect is produced ; no work is done. Now let the ring be drawn along the rod by a pull Q, from A to R The force Q does work, but P does no work in spite of the motion; for it has not effected any advance of the ring in its own direction. VIl] THE PRINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK 57 If the same motion is effected by applying the force P obliquely (Fig. 34), P does work. The effective distance through which it has moved the ring is not AB, however, but AC, the projection of AB upon the direction of the force. This projection has the full value AB when P acts along AB, and vanishes when P is at right angles to the motion. 47. In science the term Work is adopted accordiugly with the following definition. Work. A force is said to do work when its point of application is displaced in the direction of the force. When the displacement is in the opposite direction, work is said to be done against the force, and is counted negative. The unit of work is the amount of work done by unit force in displacing its point of application through unit length. If P units of force are acting through a displacement of I units of length, the work done will be P x I units of work. The engineer's unit of work is the foot-pound, i.e. the work done in lifting one pound through a vertical height of one foot. If the dynamical unit of force is employed, the unit of work is the foot-poundal ( 124). On the C.G.S. system the unit of work is the work done when a force of one dyne is exerted through a distance of one centimetre. This unit is called an Erg ( 124). 48. Returning now to the general principle stated by Bernoulli, we see that the product of each force by the dis- placement of its point of application along its direction is the work done by the force during the displacement, and is to be counted positive or negative according as the point moves in the direction in which it is urged by the force, or the opposite. And since the work is not really done (for the system remains in equilibrium, and the imaginary displacements are only an artifice to enable us to perceive the relations between the forces required to maintain equilibrium) the word virtual is used to indicate that both displacements and the consequent work done are such as might occur, consistently with the structure of the system. With these conventions the principle of Virtual Work may be stated succinctly as follows : 58 MECHANICS [CHAP. A system of forces will be in equilibrium, if the total virtual work for any infinitely small displacements consistent with the conditions is zero. 49. The displacements are to be taken infinitely small, for if a finite motion is allowed, the system may pass over into some other configuration, where different conditions of equilibrium may prevail. Fig. 35. This is not always the case. Thus in Fig. 35, the relation between the weights P and W will be the same so long as W remains at D, whether it be supported by the sphere or the plane which touches the sphere at D. (1) Let it be on the plane. Suppose the weight P to descend till W arrives at D'. Then the vertical rise of W, G'D\ is to the vertical fall of P, DD', as BG to AB, i.e., C'D' = DD'smA, whether DD' be small or great. The equation of virtual work, W x DD' sin A P x ie. = BC VII] THE PRINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK 59 holds good equally well for an infinitesimal displacement, or for the whole length of the plane. (2) But if the weight is resting on the sphere, it is only for an infinitesimal displacement (i.e. for so long as the sphere may be taken to coincide with its tangent) that we get P/TF=sin-4. Farther along the sphere the inclination of the tangent and the ratio P/W are different, so that if we want the conditions of equilibrium at D, we must restrict ourselves to an infinitely small displacement. We shall now apply this principle to a few cases that are not so easy of solution by other means. 50. The Screw. This is only a case of the Inclined Plane, as may be seen by cutting out a right-angled triangle in paper and wrapping it round a ruler. The Power is, however, applied parallel to the base of the plane, as in the Wedge ; and the plane is made to slide under the weight so as to raise it. The distance from thread to thread of- the screw, measured parallel to the axis, i.e. the distance through which the screw Fig. 36. advances for one turn of the head or lever arm, is called the Pitch of the screw. 60 MECHANICS [CHAP. Let the pitch of the screw be p, and the length of the lever- arm I. As in the inclined plane, the form of the mot : on, and hence the law of equilibrium, remains unchanged however far the screw be turned. We need not therefore restrict ourselves to an infinitely small motion. Let us suppose the screw to make one complete turn. Then, apart from friction, the virtual work consists of P x 2?rZ done by the Power ; and W x p done against the Weight. Thus for equilibrium, and P_ p _ pitch W 2irl circumference of power-circle 51. Weston's Differential Pulley consists of an upper block TheDifferen- With tWO grOOVCS of slightly different radii, R, r, connected by an endless chain, as in the figure, with a single move- able pulley. The grooves of the upper block contain notches or teeth which fit into the links of the chain so that it cannot slip. . Here again we may take the dis- placement large if we wish. Let the upper block make one revolution. The virtual work done by the Power is P X 27T.R. Meanwhile the weight is raised by half the difference between the length of chain wound up on the large groove of the upper block, and that which is unwound from the small one. Hence the virtual work done against the weight is Fig. 37. Wx 277-jR - 277T Vll] THE PRINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK For equilibrium : 61 P R-r W = '' 2R ' 52. A common form of balance for weighing letters is that Robervai-s devised by Roberval. Balance - The scales are attached to the two vertical Fig. 38. Roberval's Balance. Fig. 39. 62 MECHANICS [CHAP. sides of a jointed parallelogram, the other two sides turning about pins at their centres. If the balance moves, one scale descends exactly as much as the other rises. Hence it does not matter where the weights are placed on the scales. If they are equal, their virtual works are equal and opposite, and there will be equilibrium. 53. In the form of corkscrew figured on the preceding page the handle moves four times as far as the head of the screw. Hence the pull exerted on the screw is four times as great as that applied to the handle. ' EXAMPLES. (Many problems may be solved very easily by the principle of Virtual Work when the Differential Calculus is employed to find the small imaginary displacements of the parts of the system. For example : A hinged parallelogram of sides a, b has its opposite corners joined by strings screwed up to tensions T and T'. Find one angle of the parallelogram. Suppose the parallelogram distorted so that the angle o> is slightly increased tO O) + d(O. The reactions at each hinge are equal and opposite for the two rods meeting there, so that their virtual work vanishes. The sum of the v.w.'s for T and T' is Now AC.d(AC)= - ab sin a> . da, .d(D)=+absm a >.da>. T d(BD}_AC ' T'~ d(AC)~BD' whence As examples which may be solved without the Calculus take the following : VII] THE PRINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK 1. A light wire is stretched over two smooth pulleys at a distance of 10 feet from each other in the same horizontal line, and has 1121bs. hung at each end. What weight hung at the middle of the wire will cause it to sag one inch ? 2. An elastic ring of natural length I and weight W is laid over a smooth vertical circular cone of angle 2a. The tension of the ring when stretched to I' I a length I' is given by T= T j . At what depth below the vertex will the I ring rest ? 54. Let any forces P, Q, R, &c., act at points A, B, C, &c., and suppose them to be applied as follows. Let pr a oof a o n f g the there be pulleys at A, B, C, with other fixed principle of virtual pu ii e ys in the proper directions at A', B', C'. Attach a string at A', and carry it P times back and forth to A ; then round B', and Q times back and forth to B, Fig. 40. and so on for all the forces. Finally let it hang from the last pulley, and attach a weight equal to half a unit. Then since the 64 MECHANICS [CHAP. tension is the same throughout, if the pulleys be smooth, and 2P, 2Q, 2R, &c. strings run to A, B, C, respectively, the forces P, Q, R, will be applied at those points. Now if among the possible mutual displacements of the points A, B, C, &c., there be any which would on the whole allow the half-unit weight to descend, then it certainly will descend, and work will be done. But if the weight remained at the same level, or had to rise, whatever combination of small movements were given to A, B, G, then motion would not ensue. Suppose that the result of any such movements of A, B, C, were to shorten the strings between A A' by an amount a, those between BB' by 6, and so on. Then for equilibrium the total shortening, i.e., the amount by which the last weight would descend, must be zero, or less than zero. But the shortening of the 2P strings at A is 2Pf, and so for the others. Thus or The sum of the virtual works is therefore zero or negative. 55. Lagrange's ingenious idea makes it easier for us to understand the principle, for it enables us to fix our attention on the motion of one weight instead of many. But it is not a proof that the possibility or impossibility of doing work is decisive of equilibrium. That principle is involved in each of the pulleys he employs, as much as in the more complicated system. It can only be derived from experience. 56. Lagrange's arrangement also helps us to study the system of bodies A, B, 0, acted on by forces P, Q, R, regarded as a machine for doing work. Let the hanging weight carry a pencil pressing against a sheet of paper, carried past it horizontally, wound, for instance, on a drum with vertical axis. Then if the system be allowed to move (consistently with its mechanical connections) the depth of the hanging weight below its original position will be an indicator of the work done by the system in reaching any other configuration. The pencil will record this depth in a curve, as in Figure 41. VII] THE PRINCIPLE OF VIRTUAL WORK 65 It was pointed out by Maupertuis in 1740 that when the system arrives at a position of equilibrium, the work done is in general a maximum or a minimum. The weight is at a turning point of the curve. 1 b Fig. 41. When its height is a maximum, as at a, c, the system can do work (the weight can descend), if disturbed from the position of equilibrium on either side of it. But when the height is a minimum, as at 6, the system can only do work by returning to the position of equilibrium if disturbed from it. Stable equilibrium therefore corresponds to a maximum of work done by the system, unstable equilibrium to a minimum. If the curve remains horizontal for any finite distance, as at d, e, equilibrium exists for all the corresponding positions, with no tendency to pass from one to another. The equilibrium is then neutral equilibrium, as when a sphere rests on a horizontal plane. c. CHAPTER VIII. REVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES OF STATICS. 57. IN the historical development of Statics the different investigators have adopted different tests for the existence of equilibrium. Archimedes fixed his attention on the weights and their distances from a fulcrum, and arrived at the principle of the Lever. Stevinus divined the principle of the Inclined Plane, and referred equilibrium to a relation between the forces and their directions, more fully expressed in the Parallelogram of Forces. Galileo saw that equilibrium was determined by the weights and their vertical descent towards the earth, and so reached the principle of Work. Each of these principles is an expression of our experience from one point of view or another. As such they are equally valid. Their authority is coequal, and each is sufficient in itself as a foundation for the science of Statics. We may develope it from any one, or employ them all. Which of them shall be selected is a matter of convenience, or of historical accident. 58. As we might expect, they are mutually deducible. The Parallelogram of Forces has already been deduced from the Inclined Plane ( 38), at all events for the case when the forces are at right angles. Galileo deduced the Inclined Plane from the Lever. He points out that the ratio of P to W depends on the form of the motion, i.e. that W should move along aB, while P descends vertically. It is a matter of indifference whether W is compelled CHAP. VIII] REVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES OF STATICS 67 to do this because it rests on a plane AB, or for some other reason, as, for instance, that it should be attached by a bar aO to a fixed Fig. 42. pivot at 0. It would still have to begin to move along aB, at right angles to Oa. But in this case by Leonardo's form of the principle of the Lever ( 11), PxOa=Wx Ob, P_0&_JSC W~ Oa'AB' We shall deduce the Principle of the Lever from the Parallelo- gram of Forces later ( 174). The Principle of the Inclined Plane has been deduced from that of Work ( 40). The mutual relation of the Principle of the Lever and that of Work is easily seen. Fig. 43. 52 68 MECHANICS [CHAP. VIII Let the Lever ACB receive an infinitely small displacement to a new position A'CB'. The virtual work done by P = P x A A'. The virtual work done against W = W x BB'. Assuming the Principle of Virtual Work, we have P x AA' - W x BB' = 0. P _ BB' _ BC W~ AA'~ AC' But this is the Principle of the Lever. The converse is obviously true. 59. It is interesting to trace in this manner the connection between the various principles, but it does not increase the authority of any one of them to deduce it from another. Having followed the actual historical order in which they were arrived at, we are at liberty to make any one, or all of them, the starting point of further developments. The modern, and on the whole the most convenient, practice is to deduce the Parallelogram of Forces from Newton's Laws of Motion, themselves but another expression of experience. The other principles, and the whole science of Statics, can then be built on this principle. Statics thus becomes a special case of Dynamics, when the forces concerned happen to be in equilibrium. This is the course we shall now adopt, leaving the farther development of Statics till we have traced the discovery of the fundamental principles of Dynamics. CHAPTER IX. GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS. 60. IN 1638, when Stevin had already cleared up so much of The Problem of Statics, no progress had been made with that part Failing Bodies. o ^ e subject, now called Dynamics, which deals with Motion. The first problem to be considered was, naturally, the familiar case of the fall of heavy bodies to the earth. Its solution was the achievement of Galileo, who in the course of his researches was led to the discovery of several principles of general importance in Mechanics. It is not easy at the present day to realize the difficulties Galileo had to encounter. Let us try to strip ourselves of what is now common knowledge, and see what were the views held in his day, with all the authority of two thousand years' acceptance backed by the great name of Aristotle. The fall of heavy bodies (and the rise of light bodies which often accompanied it) was accounted for by assuming that " every body sought its natural place/' and that the place of heavy bodies was below, that of light bodies above. Thus in the Elzevir edition of Stevin, Leyden 1634, the editor, Albert Girard, speaks of " Tant de millions de matieres, qui sont disposees chacunes en leurs lieux," and gives a general definition of gravity. " Pesanteur est la force qu'une matiere demonstre & son obstacle, pour retourner en son lieu." " Ce que je demonstreray, et soustiendray en temps et lieu, a ceux qui ne le pourront pas comprendre." When movements were observed in which heavy bodies rose and light ones fell for a time, such motions were distinguished 70 MECHANICS [CHAP. from "natural" motions by the term "violent." It was believed that heavy bodies fell more quickly than light ones. It will be seen that such ideas were too vague to serve as starting points for progress. They were guesses at the reason why bodies fell ; attempts to find a cause for their motion. 61. It was already, as Mach has pointed out, a proof of genius that Galileo could so far shake himself free from the prevailing notions of his time, as to take up the modern point of view, and ask himself first how bodies fell. That is to say, he began by investigating the facts, and tried to discover the rule or law according to which the fall took place. Now a falling body starts from rest and passes over a certain distance in a certain time with a speed which a very slight observation shews to be rapidly increasing. The questions which Galileo thought important were such as these : How is the speed acquired by the body in its fall related to the distance it has fallen ? Or to the time of fall ? Here again he was met by difficulties, in the lack of experi- mental means for measuring times and speeds. The mechanical clocks of his day were useless except for considerable lengths of time, and could not be relied on for measuring a few seconds or fractions of a second. One is at a loss to know whether to admire more the ingenuity with which he overcame the experi- mental difficulties, or his philosophical insight as to the real points to be investigated. In his treatise, Discorsi e Dimonstrationi Matematici, he begins by a guess which seems natural enough at first sight, that the speed acquired will be proportional to the distance the body has fallen from rest. But before putting this to the test of experiment, he examines the hypothesis, and convinces himself that such a rule of motion involves a contradiction, is in fact inconsistent with itself. 62. The next idea that occurs to him is that perhaps the speed will be proportional to the time of fall. Finding no con- tradiction in this, he proceeds to test it experimentally. Since it was next to impossible, with the means at his disposal, IX] GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS 71 to measure the speed acquired by a body even in a short fall, he calculates the distance that a body ought to fall through, on the hypothesis that the speed acquired was at each instant proportional to the time elapsed from the start. His proof is a good instance of the use of graphic methods. o Fig. 44. 63. Let us represent the time elapsed by a straight line OA, which may be divided up so as to represent the different, intervals of which the whole time is composed. At each point, such as D, erect a perpendicular whose length shall be proportional to the speed acquired at the moment D. Then, since the speed increases proportionally to the time, the ends of these perpendiculars will lie along the straight line OB. Let OP be the speed at the middle moment. It is clearly half AB, the final speed. Consider two points, D, E equidistant from C. The speeds DQ, ER will be the one as much less, as the other is greater than CP, the speed at the middle moment. So that if we compare the real motion with that of a body which should start with the speed CP and maintain it unchanged throughout, we see that any loss of distance travelled, owing to the smaller speed at D, will be exactly compensated for by the greater speed at the corresponding point E. The distances fallen through by the two bodies will therefore be the same in the end. 72 MECHANICS [CHAP. As we do not know the speed acquired by a falling body during a fall of one second, let us call it g feet per second. Then if the idea that the speed is proportional to the time of fall be correct, the speed at the end of t seconds will be gt. The speed at the middle moment will be gt/2, and the distance fallen by a body moving with this speed unchanged for the whole t seconds, will be ?-x ; *- 2 * ~ 2 ' We could thus make a table for different numbers of seconds, as follows : Time of Fall Speed acquired Space fallen 1 second 9 $r/2xl = g/2 2 2g g/2 x 2 2 = 2g 3 % g/2x& = 9g/2 * gt g/2xt* 64. Galileo's Method. To avoid the difficulties introduced by the great speed acquired Experimental ^J a body falling freely even for one or two seconds, Galileo assumed that a ball rolling down an inclined plane in a groove would follow the same kind of rule as a freely falling body, but with diminished speed. Marking the groove at different distances from the top, he proceeded to measure the times occupied by the ball in reaching the various marks, and verified that the distances travelled really increased as the squares of the times. For the measurement of the times Galileo made an ingenious modification of the water-clock of Archimedes, which had not been hitherto applied to the measurement of small times. The speed at which water flows out of a hole in the bottom of a vessel depends on the height of water standing above the hole. Galileo took a broad vessel of large area, and hence the level was not appreciably altered during one of his experiments. At the moment when the ball was released he removed his finger from the hole, allowing the water to flow into a vessel which was placed on a balance. When the ball reached a mark, the hole was closed IX] GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS 73 by the finger again, and the time elapsed could be measured by weighing the water which had escaped. Figure 45 represents a modern version of Galileo's apparatus. It is found that the squares of the times required to reach the different marks are proportional to the distances of the marks MECHANICS [CHAP. from the starting point. The student should make experiments with different slopes of the plane, and plot the results on squared paper, laying out the distances along a horizontal line, and the times in the vertical direction. The curve so obtained will be a parabola. If we choose the vertical ordinates to represent the squares of the times, instead of the times themselves, we obtain a straight line. \ ^ cc ^ y i /* r g i ; / z ce / s A I / / / Di St^ftU. e i. n, 7m. t. 100 200 1 / 7 2 5 /! .c / 1 5 / 1 B / H I/ u i 1 i. / 1 / ; / 7 / t / 2 DI,. tC&7lC& I n- J7771*. 3 100 200 300 Fig. 46. Fig. 47. 65. With modern apparatus it is easy to verify the same law for bodies falling freely. Experiment. Let a plate of smoked glass be suspended as in the figure, so that when the thread is burnt away, it will fall past a horizontal tuning fork to which a bristle is attached. The fork, when sounded, makes a definite number of vibrations every second, say 100. The result will be a trace on the smoked glass con- sisting of a number of waves growing longer and longer, since, as the plate gathers speed, a greater and greater distance will be travelled in each hundredth of a second. By measuring the length of a wave at any distance from the starting point, we can find the speed at which the plate was moving after falling through that distance. Make several such IX] GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS 75 measurements. Since the distance fallen is proportional to the square of the time, and the speed proportional to the time, the Fig. 48. squares of the speed will vary as the distances fallen through. Plot your results on squared paper, and see if this is the case. between Speed acquired and Vertical Fall. Ideas, of great importance in Mechanics, suggested to Galileo by his experiments. 66. In default of means for studying directly the motion of a . The connection body falling freely, Galileo asked himself how the motion of a body sliding down an inclined plane, would be related to that of a body falling freely. He concludes that : The speed attained on an inclined plane must be the same as that attained in falling freely through the same vertical height. At first sight this seems a startling assumption. But consider what would be the consequence if it were not true. Let a body slide from A to B, and then be reflected up the equally inclined plane EG (Fig. 49). Galileo feels that it will exactly reverse its motion, losing speed precisely as it gained it 76 MECHANICS [CHAP. along AB, and coming to rest at C, at the height from which it started. Fig. 49. Let it next be reflected up a plane of less inclination, BC'. It must still reach the same height. For if it went farther, it would have risen, without external aid, beyond its original height ; and by arranging a series of steep and gentle slopes alternately we could make a body, starting from the top of the first slope, raise itself unaided to any height we choose. But this we feel to be contrary to all our experience. "We have never met with anything like it. If on the other hand it failed to reach C', we should only have. to start the body from C' and it would rise above A, and the same contradiction of experience would arise. It must therefore rise to C', neither more nor less. Hence the speed attained must be the same for the same vertical fall, what- ever the slope of the plane on which it takes place. IX] GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS 77 67. It is characteristic of Galileo's modern spirit that he at once proceeds to test this conclusion by an experiment, and that a very beautiful one. Experiment. Hang a bullet by a thread from a nail 0, and drawing it aside to A release it. It describes the curve AB, which Galileo perceives may be regarded as a series of very short inclined planes of different slopes, so that his law should hold for the curve as well as for the plane. It then reverses its motion, arriving at C, in the same hori- zontal level with A. Drive a nail in at E, and repeat the experiment. After passing the vertical the bullet will describe a circle of shorter radius BD. But it will rise to exactly the same level, whatever circle we make it describe. 68. Galileo's assumption no longer strikes us as strange when we realize that it involves only the perception that bodies cannot, unaided, raise themselves to a higher level above the earth, a fact which we feel instinctively to agree with all our experience. With the aid of this assumption, since he could already deter- mine the space fallen through in a given time on an inclined plane, he was able to form a notion of the velocity acquired by a body falling freely. Let us however perform the experiment directly. 69. Experiment Apparatus required : A pendulum ticking- seconds loudly ; or a metronome set to beat seconds or half seconds. A ball which may be dropped from a height of 16*1 feet. If the ball be released by hand precisely at any tick of the pendulum, it will be heard to strike the floor at the next tick. (The result will be more accurate if the ball be of iron, suspended from an electromagnet whose circuit is broken by the pendulum itself as it makes the first tick. Experimental Mechanics. Sir R. Ball.) Since the ball covers 161 feet in one second, its average speed must be 16'1 feet per second. But this ( 63) is one-half the final speed. Therefore in one second it has acquired a speed of 32'2 feet per second. 78 MECHANICS [CHAP. 70. We must now attend to an inference which Galileo draws 2. The First Law fr m his experiments, as it were incidentally, and of Motion. probably without seeing its full importance. He was most likely led to it by the Principle of Continuity. In geometry a doubtful conclusion may often be tested by trying whether it is true in an extreme case. The great investigators have this principle continually in mind. " Natura non agit per saltum." It is not likely that one law should hold good in one case, and quite a different one in some other case only slightly different from it. Apply this to the case of the body falling down the inclined plane in figure 49. What will happen if the second plane be made more and more oblique ? It is clear the body will have to travel farther and farther before it reaches the level AC', and if the second plane be made ultimately horizontal, the body will never reach the level, however far it may travel. But in this case it would go on for ever ! At the same time we see that no part of the weight is employed in stopping it. Hence a motion once started, will continue indefinitely if nothing interferes to stop it. Now this is an entirely new point of view, not only contrary to the current ideas of Galileo's time, but surprising to many uninstr acted people even at the present day. Since all the move- ments we observe in practice are shortly brought to rest by various frictions and resistances, it is quite natural to imagine, as the unobservant do to this day, that every motion requires some cause or force to maintain it, and ceases when the force is with- drawn. Logic will not help us to settle the question. For against the principle, " the effect of a cause persists/' we may set another, such as "cessante causa cessat effectus." Nothing but experiment can decide whether in this case the "effect" of the force is the change of place, or the speed acquired. Now Galileo perceives from his experiments that the " effect " of the weight of a body is to produce a change in its speed*. We shall see what an advance this was, if we compare the old idea that " bodies sought their place," that of heavy bodies being below, with Galileo's notion. When a stone is thrown upwards, the first principle seems to be contradicted, for the heavy stone rises. But Galileo sees that its weight is changing its speed, as * See Mach, Mechanics, pp. 140143. IX] GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS *79 much during the rise as during the fall, reducing it by 32'2 feet per second in every second, till at last it comes to rest, and then begins the descent. 71. The notion of speed as applied to bodies moving uni- 3 . variable formly must have been as familiar in Galileo's velocity. day as in ours. If a man walks steadily for three hours and finds he has travelled twelve miles, he estimates that he has been walking at the rate of four miles an hour. We may watch him for one hour and find that he goes four miles. Or we may time him for any distance and make the calculation that in one hour he will travel four miles. The relation between t, the number of hours, s, the miles travelled, and v, the speed in miles per hour, is evidently But this notion no longer serves us in the case of the falling stone, which changes its speed from moment to moment. Observe, however, that the rule s v t in no way depends on the particular distance we choose to measure. Provided we have the means of determining very short times and distances we may calculate the speed as well from noting the distance travelled in the millionth part of a second, as from that travelled in a day. Precisely this method is employed in finding the muzzle velocity of a rifle bullet, or cannon ball. Two screens of tinfoil are set up, a short distance apart in front of the rifle, and these are made parts of two electric circuits through which currents pass to two electromagnets. The magnets hold back pens that are arranged to press upon a sheet of paper pasted on a drum which rotates by clockwork. So long as the screens are intact, the pens describe lines on the paper; but when a screen is broken, the corresponding pen instantly flies back and makes a nick in the line, thus : ' & a a a a seconds from clock. b record. Fig. 51. 80 MECHANICS [CHAP. If we know the distance between the screens, and the speed of the paper on the drum, and measure the lengths aa, ab, we can find the average speed of the bullet for the short distance between the screens ; and by making this distance less and less we arrive at the conception of the speed of the bullet at a definite point of its path. In the language of the Differential Calculus a very short distance is indicated by the symbol As, and a very short time by As A& The speed at a given instant will then be the value of in the limiting case when both As and A are vanishingly small, and t includes the given instant. This limiting value is written ds -J-, and the notion of such a limit, as measuring the rate of change of some quantity s (in our case a distance) as compared with some other quantity t (in our case the time), is the funda- mental idea out of which the Differential Calculus grew. We mention it here for the sake of its importance, though we shall not use it in our further calculations. 72. In the study of the falling stone there is another notion that we cannot do without. Such questions arise 4. Acceleration. HIT n- as these : Do all bodies in falling get up speed at the same rate ? Does the same stone increase its speed by the same amount in each second of its fall ? We are thus forced to - the idea of the rate at which the speed changes. The name Acceleration is given to this idea, and it is convenient to apply it in cases where the speed is diminishing, as well as when it is increasing, considering the acceleration positive when the speed increases, and negative when it diminishes. Acceleration clearly bears to velocity the same relation that velocity bears to distance travelled. It may be measured on the same principles. If it be found that in t seconds a body has acquired a new velocity of v feet per second, the acceleration a will be given by As before, we see that v and t may be as small as we choose, provided we have the means of measuring them, without affecting IX] GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS 81 the principle; and that a body may have an acceleration varying from moment to moment exactly as in the case of velocities. 73. Recurring to the experiments on the inclined plane, Galileo perceived that a falling body had a constant acceleration, the same at all parts of its fall, since in each second the speed increases by equal increments. Since we know that the speed acquired in one second is 32'2 feet per second, we can now calculate the speed acquired in any number of seconds from the formula ?; = 32-2 x t, and the distance fallen through, from the formula s = ^ x 2 = 16'lx 2 . , . We may now sum up Galileo's investigations of the motion of a falling body in the statement that its weight produces a constant acceleration downwards, measured by the speed gained in each second (or lost, if the body is rising), viz. 32 '2 feet per second. This acceleration is usually denoted by the letter g, and for rough calculations (unless otherwise stated) it may be taken as 74. One other point due to Galileo must be mentioned. 5. The Path of a Since the stone acquires during every second of projectile. i is f a j} an extra spee( j o f ^'2 feet per second, the action of the weight in producing speed is clearly independent of any speed the body may previously possess. For it gains as much speed during the third second, for example, when it starts the second with speed of 64*4, as during the first second, when it- starts from rest. Galileo at once extends this to the case where a body has, to begin with, a velocity in some other direction than the vertical. Let a stone be thrown horizontally from A with a speed v. Its motion will consist of two parts. (1) As a heavy body, it will in t seconds fall through a vertical height gt-j2, and if this were all, it would arrive at JV, where MECHANICS [CHAP. (2) But meanwhile the horizontal velocity will carry it to the right through a distance A T = vt, since nothing is hindering or Fig. 52. helping its horizontal motion, and therefore by the First Law of Motion ( 70) its horizontal speed will remain unchanged. Galileo sees that it will thus arrive at P, since both motions will take place simultaneously. Plotting a number of points such as P, corresponding to different times, and noting that in every case PN Z = vH* = x ?r- = x AN. 9 2 9 he finds that the stone will describe a parabola. We shall deal with the theory of projectiles more fully later on, and with another discovery due to Galileo, which can only be mentioned here, viz. the constancy of the time of oscillation of a pendulum, a discovery which Galileo was the first to apply to timing the pulse in disease. IX] GALILEO AND THE BEGINNINGS OF DYNAMICS 83 EXAMPLES. (0 = 32.) 1. From observations of the eclipses of Jupiter's moons, which take place too early when the earth is between the sun and Jupiter, and too late when the earth is on the opposite side of the sun to Jupiter, Roemer con- cluded that light requires 16 minutes 36 seconds to cross the earth's orbit. Taking this diameter to be 195,600,000 miles, find the velocity of light in miles per second. 2. The velocity of sound in air at the ordinary temperature is 1120 feet per second. A thunder clap is observed to follow the flash of lightning at an interval of 8 seconds. How far off is the storm if the time required by the light to reach the observer is taken as zero ? 3. Express a velocity of 60 miles an hour in feet per second. 4. A train 300 feet long passes a telegraph post in 12 seconds, and, gaining speed steadily, passes another post a quarter of a mile further on in 10 seconds. Find (1) the average speed at each post in miles per hour ; (2) the average speed between posts ; (3) the time taken to travel from one to the other ; and compare the acceleration of the train with that of gravity. 5. How long does it take a body to fall down a vertical precipice of 2000 feet? 6. A stone is dropped from a cliff into the sea, and is seen to reach the water in 4^ seconds. What is the height of the cliff ? 7. A stone dropped down a well is heard to strike the water after 4j seconds. The temperature being just above freezing point, the velocity of sound is 1024 feet per second. What is the depth of the well ? 62 CHAPTER X. HUYGHENS AND THE PKOBLEM OF UNIFORM MOTION IN A CIRCLE. " CENTRIFUGAL FORCE." 75. GALILEO in the course of his investigations of the motion of falling bodies, had been led to the following conclusions : (1) The weight of a body, if free to act, produces in it a constant downward acceleration, such that it gains speed at the rate of g = 32'2 feet per second in every second of its fall. (2) The distance fallen through in a time t seconds is gt 2 /2. (3) If the weight is counteracted, as when the body arrives upon a smooth horizontal plane, its speed is no longer altered, but it moves forward uniformly in a straight line. (4) If the body is projected with any speed in any other direction, the action of the weight is in no way affected by this new speed, but the motion of the body is compounded of the motion of a falling body and the uniform speed in a given direction initially imparted to it. 76. The next case to be investigated was that of a body moving round in a circle with uniform speed, as when a stone is placed on a smooth horizontal table, so as to neutralize the effect of its weight, and then whirled round at the end of a string. It will be found that, when a fair speed has been attained, the hand which holds the string is practically motionless at the centre of the circle, but is conscious of a steady outward pull on the string. This problem was investigated by C. Huyghens (1629 1695) some of whose many brilliant services to Mechanics must be more OF THE UNIVERSITY OF D. CONSTANTINVS 'HVGENS E,QVES TOPARCHA SV YLRCQAt CHAP. X] CENTRIFUGAL FORCE 85 fully noticed later on. Here we will give his solution of this particular problem in more modern form. Once Galileo's ideas were abroad, it was natural to ask : Why does not the stone move onwards in a straight line with unchanging speed ? The answer is obvious. It is subject to a pull, applied by means of the string, of the same nature as the weight of the stone, since the weight might be supported by such a pull, and so balanced. Just as the weight of a falling body gives it a constant acceleration downwards, this pull must give the stone an acceler- ation along the string at each point of its path, by which it constantly acquires velocity towards the centre, and is deflected from the tangent at that point. Before finding what this acceleration is, let us observe that a string cannot be stretched by means of a pull applied to one end only. The hand applies a pull inwards at the centre, and we are conscious of an apparent outward pull exerted by the moving stone. This is the so-called " centrifugal force." In studying the motion of the stone it must be remembered that the stone is subject to the pull inwards. 77. To find the acceleration a P T of a stone describing a circle of radius r with uniform speed v. (1) Direction. The accelera- tion must be directed always towards the centre of the circle. For since there is no change in the speed with which the stone moves along the circle, any new velocity acquired must be at right angles to the circle at that point, i.e. along the radius. (2) Magnitude. Suppose the string cut when the stone is at P. Then the stone would move along the tangent, with un- changed speed, and in a very short time t seconds, would travel a distance = vt. Fig. 53. Again, suppose the stone to be at rest at P, and then acted on by the pull of the string for the same very short time t. By 86 MECHANICS [CHAP. Galileo's law of falling bodies, the acceleration produced, a, would cause it to fall through a distance If the time t be very short indeed, say one billionth of a second, the direction of the string, and therefore of the acceleration, will be parallel to PO throughout. Now the actual motion of the stone is compounded of both these motions taking place simultaneously ; and it arrives at Q. Since Q is a point on the circle, the distances PN, PT are not independent, but are connected by definite geometrical relations. For instance, if TQ be produced to cut the circle in Q', we know that Substituting the values of PT, TQ, we have a*V*x4V- HI ** ft . When the time t is made very short, TQ' approaches more and more nearly to POP, and since the form of the law connecting TP, TQ remains the same, however small t is made, we see that when we arrive at the actual case of the stone changing its direction from point to point, and . 2r . t 2 r This may be put in another form which is often convenient, since we frequently know the radius of the circle, and the periodic time, that is the time in which the stone makes one complete revolution, so as to arrive at the point from which it started. Let this time of one revolution be T seconds. rnu Then V V* 4-7T 2 a = r = "T^ r - Since the radius to the stone describes in T seconds an angle whose circular measure is 2?r, its angular velocity, measured in 9 radians per second, is -^ . Let this be denoted by &>. Then the acceleration may be expressed in still a third way, a = eoV. X] CENTRIFUGAL FORCE 87 EXAMPLES. 1. Compare the "centrifugal force" on a body at the equator with gravity, taking the earth's radius as 3963 miles, and the time of revolution to be 86164 seconds. 2. A flywheel 10 feet in diameter makes 40 revolutions a minute. Compare the " centrifugal force " at the rim with gravity. 3. A train runs round a curve of radius 600 feet at 60 miles an hour. What acceleration must it receive inwards ? 4. A stone is whirled round in a vertical plane at the end of a string 2 ft. 6 ins. long. Shew that in order that it may describe perfect circles, its velocity at the lowest point must not be less than 20 feet per second. 5. In a " centrifugal railway " the cars, after descending a steep incline, run round the inside of a vertical circle 20 feet in diameter, making a com- plete turn over. Shew that if there were no friction, they must start from a point not less than 5 feet above the top of the circle. CHAPTER XL FINAL STATEMENT OF THE PEINCIPLES OF DYNAMICS. EXTENSION TO THE MOTIONS OF THE HEAVENLY BODIES. LAW OF UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION. NEWTON. "Qui genus humanum ingenio superavit." 78. HUYGHENS' theorems concerning circular motion were published in 1673 in his Horologium Oscillatorium, which con- tained many other discoveries of capital importance ; both geometrical, such as the properties of cycloids, evolutes, and the theory of the circle of curvature ; and practical, as the invention and construction of the pendulum clock, the escapement, and the method of determining the acceleration of gravity by means of pendulum observations. Galileo's ideas were evidently becoming familiar. It was recognized that a motion would continue unchanged unless there were some circumstance to interfere with it, or, as we should say, unless some force acted on the body to alter its motion ; that if such a force acted, it would produce a change of speed, or an acceleration, from which the motion could be calculated ; and that motion in a curve would result from the combination of a deflecting force with a motion already existing, as in the case of projectiles, and motion in a circle. 79. The problem that stood next in order for solution was the most imposing and difficult that has ever been achieved by the human mind. It was To explain the movements 6f the heavenly bodies, other than the fixed stars, i.e. of the moon, the planets, their satellites, and the comets. OF THE UNIVERSITY CHAP, xi] KEPLER'S LAWS 89 The first steps had already been taken. Copernicus had shewn that the complicated movements of the planets, which appeared to advance, stand still, recede, and then advance again with baffling irregularity, when viewed by a spectator on the earth, could be reduced to comparative order and simplicity, if the sun were regarded as the fixed point about which they took place. The planets, the earth being now one of them, apparently described circular orbits about the sun. 80. Closer observation shewed that this was not exactly the case. Next, Kepler with incredible patience had deduced the true laws of their motion from a life-long study of Tycho Brahe's observations. He found that : (1) The planets describe ellipses about the sun in one focus. (2) The areas swept out by the radius vector in any orbit are proportional to the times. And he had found, near the end of his life, a third law con- necting the different orbits. (3) The squares of the periodic times are proportional to the cubes of the semi-axes major (or of the mean distances). 81. Attempts had even been made to explain the planetary movements on mechanical principles, i.e. to trace a relation between them and such cases of motion as were already familiar. Thus Kepler himself suggested that the planets were carried round by spokes or radii attached to the sun ; and Des Cartes invented a theoty of Vortices according to which each planet was maintained in motion by a whirl or eddy in a fluid which filled all space. But these guesses arose from a false idea that motion required something to keep it up ; and this was contrary to Galileo's First Law of Motion. What was needed was, not a force to sustain their motion, but a deflecting force, that might cause them to move perpetually out of the straight line along the curve of their orbits. And since the ellipses they described differed but little from circles, and their speed in their courses varied very slightly, it looked as if any disturbing force must act almost at right angles to their direction of motion, and therefore towards the central body. 90 MECHANICS [CHAP. 82. Seven years before Huyghens published his Horologium Oscillatorium, these ideas had been clearly grasped by a young graduate of Trinity College, Cambridge, who was destined to evolve from them the complete solution of the great problem, and to bring every known motion in the universe beneath the sway of a single law. As an incident in the course of his work, he completed the fundamental principles of Dynamics, and stated the Laws of Motion in a form which with the aid of proper mathematical analysis, suffices for the solution of all other mechanical problems. Isaac Newton, by universal consent the greatest name in the roll-call of Science, was born on Christmas day 1642 at the Manor House of Woolsthorpe, a hamlet about six miles from Grantham in Lincolnshire. His father was a yeoman farmer. His mother, Hannah Ayscough, already widowed when Newton was born, is spoken of as "the widow Newton, an extraordinary good woman." One of her brothers held a neighbouring living, and was a graduate of Trinity College, Cambridge. Small hint in such ancestry of the genius which has impressed contemporaries and posterity alike as almost superhuman ! Newton was educated at Grantham Grammar School till the age of fifteen, and shewing no aptitude for farming, was on the advice of his uncle sent back to school and in 1661 to Cambridge. He graduated in 1664 ; was made Fellow of his College in 1667 ; and Lucasian Professor of Mathematics 1669, succeeding Barrow who had noted his unparalleled genius. Meanwhile as an under- graduate he had discovered the Binomial Theorem in Algebra, and had begun the invention of his method of Fluxions, now known as the Differential Calculus. 1665 was the year of the Great Plague. The whole College was sent down, and Newton returned to Woolsthorpe, there for a quiet year to ponder the new ideas he had gathered at the University. 83. It would be presumptuous to speculate on the workings of a mind like Newton's. Fortunately he has himself described the course of his thoughts, and there are other accounts by Wharton and by Pemberton based on his lectures and conversa- tions in after years. Thinking over Kepler's Laws in the light of XI] NEWTON AND KEPLER'S LAWS 91 Galileo's dynamical principles, he was led to see that the planets could be made to describe circular orbits with uniform speed, if they were acted on by a force emanating from the sun, whose intensity was inversely proportional to the square of the distance. For since ( 77) a body describing a circle of radius r in a time T has an acceleration to the centre and since by Kepler's third law T- for the different planets is pro- portional to r 3 , the accelerations must be inversely proportional to r 2 . If the attracting force were looked on as an emanation from the sun, one might almost expect such a law of diminution of its intensity. For the areas of the spheres which have to be affected at greater and greater distances increase as the squares of their radii, and hence the intensity at any particular spot on any sphere would be inversely as the square of its radius. 84. But would the same law hold for the actual case, i.e. for elliptic orbits about the sun in one focus? In the first place Kepler's second law shewed that the force must still act towards the sun ( 225-6). To prove that the law of the inverse square was the correct law, and the only correct law, for an elliptic orbit described about a centre of force in one focus (not about the centre of the ellipse, for that requires a different law, 229) was a mathematical feat that required the genius of a Newton. It was, in fact, the intellectual part of his achievement, and may be easily appreciated even now by any one who, with a fair training in Conic Sections, will try to work out 232 for himself. 85. It is not so easy to realize, because the fact has become so familiar, the audacity of imagination by which Newton dis- cerned, first in the case of the moon, that the force which regulates the courses of the heavenly bodies is no more than ordinary gravity, which pulls a stone to the earth. According to the well known anecdote the great flight of fancy was taken when Newton, convinced of the need of such a central force, directed towards the earth, to account for the moon's motion, but unwilling to adopt 92 MECHANICS the theory till he could lay his finger on the force, observed the fall of an apple in the orchard at Woolsthorpe*. "The earth pulls the apple, though not connected with it. Why should it not pull the moon ? " When you think of it, this is not so daring after all. For the earth pulls stones at all heights accessible to us. Why should it cease to do so even at the height of the moon ? We should even expect this according to the principle of continuity. 86. But is it so ? Newton made the simple calculation, using the data at his disposal. The moon's distance is sixty radii of the earth. Gravity at the moon should be ^- as p powerful as at the surface of the earth, (i.e. one radius from the centre). At the surface of the earth it pulls a stone through 16 2 feet in t seconds, by Gali- leo's formula; therefore through 16 x 60 2 feet in a minute. If it is gravity which holds the moon in its orbit, the moon should fall through ^ of 16 x 60 2 , i.e. 16 feet per minute towards the earth. Let PQ be the distance travelled by the moon in one minute. Then the distance it falls towards the earth is ON 2 PQ Z PN = = r approximately, where R is the earth's radius. * We are permitted to believe the story, for it is explicitly stated to be the fact by Conduitt, his assistant at the Mint, and husband of his favourite niece ; by Voltaire, who had it from Mrs Conduitt ; and by E. Greene, on the authority of XI] NEWTON. GRAVITATION 93 27r x 60 x R PQ= 39343 since the moon's period is 39343 minutes. For the value of R Newton had only the nautical estimate that every degree was 60 miles, so that a circumference, or ZjrR = 60 x 360 miles. Thus 2?r x ZirR x 60 2 2 x 3'14 x 60 x 360 x 60 2 x 5280 120x39343 2 = 120 x 39343* = 13-88 feet. This is too small. If gravity were the force acting, the moon should fall through 16 feet per minute. 87. Newton's behaviour in face of this disappointing result is as marvellous an instance of scientific reserve, as his daring guess was of scientific imagination. At the age of twenty-three the secret of the universe is almost within his grasp. Nay, it is certain that Kepler's laws can be explained by a central force inversely as the square of the distance. But " hypotheses non tingo." Rather than base his theory on anything but a "vera causa," a force known to exist on other grounds, he lays aside the whole subject in silence. Six years later, in 1672, Picard of Paris communicated to the Royal Society a new and careful determination of the size of a degree, making it 69 miles instead of 60. When this came to Newton's knowledge, he took out his old papers, and made the calculation with the new numbers, and it is said that as it became clear that the result would accord with theory, his excitement was so great that he could not see the paper to finish his work*. For two years he now threw himself into the labour of working out the detailed application of his discovery with such ardour and concentration of mind that he often forgot to take foodf. Martin Folkes, who was associated with Newton as Vice-President of the Boyal Society when Newton was President. The tree from which, according to tradition, the apple fell, was blown down in 1820, and some of its wood has' been preserved. * There seems to be no authority for this particular story, first given by Kobison in 1804. t There are many anecdotes illustrating Newton's absentmindedness during these years. 94 MECHANICS [CHAP. 88. A great deal had to be done. First a new method had to be devised, for treating things which were almost insensibly but yet continually varying, such as the direction of motion in the curved path of a planet, and its gradually changing speed ; and the varying force which acted on it as it moved closer to the sun or farther away from it. From the doctrine of limiting ratios of vanishingly small quantities employed by Newton arose the Method of Fluxions and afterwards the Differential Calculus. 89. Next, the principles of Mechanics had to be collected and completed, and put in a shape convenient for the calculation of orbits described under any laws of force, and particularly that found in nature, the inverse square of the distance, about which a number of special propositions had to be proved. Then these had to be verified for the planets and their satellites, and the comets also brought under the law. But if the earth, the sun, and the planets attract other bodies according to this law, why not also much smaller bodies such as meteorites ? Again, must we not suppose that every part of the earth shares in producing the attraction ? Nay, must not every part attract every other part ? Or, rather, must not every particle in the universe attract every other particle according to the law of the inverse square of the distance ? 90. Before it was possible to accept this idea, Newton had. to shew how a sphere, such as the earth, composed of particles attracting according to the inverse square of the distance, would act on an external body. He worked out a number of propositions shewing how a sphere would act on a particle inside it, on its surface, and at any distance outside. For instance, in the last case the attraction is the same as if the whole substance were collected at the centre of the sphere. 91. Another application was based on Kepler's third law. Knowing the distance of any planet from the sun and the length of its year, and also the length of the lunar month and the distance of the moon from the earth, Newton was able to compare the mass, or " quantity of matter " in the sun with that of the earth. XI] NEWTON. THE MOON'S MOTION 95 92. But perhaps his most amazing achievement was his treatment of the perturbations of the moon's orbit. The moon is attracted by the sun as well as by the earth, and hence her motion varies in a number of ways from a true elliptic motion about the earth. The most important of these " inequalities " or irregularities were worked out by geometrical methods which no one has been able to advance beyond the point where Newton left them. These are : (a) The evection, a periodical change in the eccentricity of the ellipse, discovered by Hipparchus and Ptolemy. (b) The variation, by which new and full moon occur a little too early, and the quadratures a little too late; and (c) The annual equation, a variation in the other perturba- tions depending on the varying position of the earth in her orbit. These two were discovered by Tycho Brahe. (d) The regression of the nodes ; and (e) The variation of the inclination of the moon's orbit. These were at the time being observed by Flamsteed at Greenwich. (/) The progression of the apses, whereby the moon's orbit turns round in its own plane through 3 in a year. Two other inequalities : (g) The inequality of the apogee, (h) The inequality of the nodes, were predicted by Newton, never having been noticed by the observers before. Newton's calculation of (/) gave only 1J, one half the observed amount. D'Alembert, Clairaut, and others of the great analytical mathematicians attempted to account for this curious discrepancy, but arrived at the same result ; till at last Clairaut found that a number of terms had been omitted in the series as unimportant, which turned out to be not negligible, and when these were included, the result was correct. It was not till Professor Adams, one of the discoverers of Neptune, was editing 96 MECHANICS [CHAP. the Newton papers in the possession of the Earl of Portsmouth, that MSS. were discovered shewing that Newton had himself reworked the calculations, and found out the cause of error, but had not published the correction ! 93. Newton made several other remarkable applications of his theory. From the time of revolution of the earth, considered as a fluid mass, he calculated its oblateness, and conversely, from the observed shape of Jupiter he estimated the length of Jupiter's day. Then from the shape of the earth so deduced, combining its attraction with the effect of the " centrifugal force " of its rotation, he compared the force of gravity at the poles and the equator. Again, from the attractions of the sun and moon on the earth's equatorial protuberance, he explained and calculated the precession of the equinoxes. Finally, he worked out the theory of the Tides from the unequal attraction of the moon upon the solid nucleus of the earth, and on the nearer and farther parts of the ocean, taking account of special conformations of land and water in different parts of the earth ; explained the spring and neap tides as the resultant of the tides due to the moon and tbe sun ; reckoned the height of the solar tide from his known mass ; and then from the observations of the spring and neap tides deduced a first estimate of the mass of the moon. 94. "In 1683, among the leading lights of the Royal Society, the same sort of notions about gravity arid the solar system began independently to be bruited. The theory of gravitation seemed to be in the air, and Wren, Hooke, and Halley had many a talk about it." "Hooke shewed an experiment with a pendulum, which he likened to a planet going round the sun. The analogy is more superficial than real. It does not obey Kepler's laws ; still it was a striking experiment. They had guessed at a law of inverse squares, and their difficulty was to prove what curve a body subject to it would describe. They knew it ought to be an ellipse if it was to serve to explain the planetary motion, and Hooke said XT] NEWTON. GRAVITATION 97 he could prove that an ellipse it was ; but he was nothing of a mathematician, and the others scarcely believed him. Undoubt- edly he had shrewd inklings of the truth, though his guesses were based on little else than a most sagacious intuition. He surmised also that gravity was the force concerned, and asserted that the path of an ordinary projectile was an ellipse, like the path of a planet which is quite right*." In January 1684 Wren offered a prize a book worth forty shillings to Hooke and Halley if either of them could produce a proof that a body under the law of inverse squares would describe an ellipse. But as nothing was forthcoming, in the following August Halley made a journey to Cambridge and put the question to Newton, who then for the first time told him that he had worked it all out a dozen years before ! Halley communicated his discovery to the Royal Society, and at their request Newton revised and completed his papers and allowed them to be published. The Principia appeared in 1687, and in connection with this momentous event it should not be forgotten that not only was its publication brought about by Halley, but that he saw the work through the press and defrayed the cost at his own risk. I 95. It is obvious that the conception of universal gravitation introduces a wonderful simplicity and order into our views of the varied and complicated motions of the heavenly bodies. It sets us at a new point of view from which the intricate movements which had puzzled the ages are seen to fall into their places as parts of a general scheme whose secret can be expressed in a single, simple, universally applicable statement. But Newton is very careful to warn us that he has not discovered the causes of these movements; not even framed a hypothesis to account for the attraction of gravitation. He has found a formula which describes with extreme simplicity and universality how the motions go on. So that by means of it we can comprehend them in all their bewildering complexity, or com- municate our knowledge to others, or calculate how they will go on happening, and use our predictions to shape our conduct wisely. Not even the fall of a stone is explained, in the sense that * Lodge, Pioneers of Science. C. 7 98 MECHANICS [CHAP. a cause is found for it. Nothing is explained in this sense, but by the law of gravitation the most complicated motions known to us in the universe are brought into relation with the simple case of the stone, and what was remote and strange is reduced to what is familiar enough. 96. We have dwelt so long on the discovery of the law of gravitation partly because of its intrinsic interest and importance, and partly for the sake of the light it throws on the method by which science advances. But we must now turn to what more immediately concerns us several very important steps in the development of Mechanical theory to which Newton was Ted in the course of solving his great problem. 97. Newton realized more clearly than had ever been done before that motion could be altered not only by 1. Generalization i -n i i of the idea of means of pushes and pulls, in which we are conscious of the muscular effort by which we effect the change, but by other circumstances, such as the supposed attraction of the earth, and the known attractions of electrified and magnetized bodies, which Dr Gilbert of Colchester had recently written about so admirably. Now when we make a muscular effort, we say that we exert a Force. Newton generalized this idea so as to make it include all the other cases, and gave it the definition still current. Definition of Force. Force is any circumstance which changes or tends to change a body's state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line. 2. The Parallel- 98. This principle, already dimly grasped by ogram oi Forces. Galileo and Steviuus, was now stated explicitly. 99. In view of the law of gravitation it appeared that a body 3. The concept might have very different weights according to its position with regard to the earth, and indeed would have no weight at all, if it were placed at the centre of the earth, or at a very great distance from any attracting body. Nevertheless the object remains unchanged even when its weight disappears. XI] WEIGHT AND MASS 99 We cannot remove objects to the centre of the earth or to immense distances. But let us neutralize the weight of some object. Thus a curling stone on smooth ice has its weight supported by the upward pressure of the ice. But a considerable effort is required to set it in motion, or to stop it when once started. Hang two equal weights by a string over a smoothly running pulley. They will rest in any position. But an effort is required to get them into motion, and this effort will be greater the greater the size of the weights, and greater for leaden weights than for weights of equal size made of brass. Again, a heavy fly-wheel on a smooth axle will rest in any position, but requires effort to start it or stop it. From a consideration of such cases it is clear that there is something about a body, not its weight, which has a great effect in determining its behaviour when acted on by forces, and which, so far as we know, remains unchanged even when the weight is neutralized or altered. The term " Inertia " was introduced to indicate that bodies had no power to produce changes in their own motion, and offered an apparent resistance to changes of motion, which had to be overcome by an effort of some kind from outside. There thus emerges a very important distinction between the weight of a body, which is variable and depends on its position with regard to some other attracting body, such as the earth ; and something else, apparently an unchangeable attribute of the body, which determines how it will respond to the action of forces tending to change its motion. Newton rather unfortunately called this "the quantity of matter" in the body. The modern term is "mass." We shall define this term more precisely later, but at present call the attention of the student to the distinction between mass and weight, which Newton was the first to realize. 100. To clear the way for the solution of his great problem 4 . The Laws Newton began by laying down three ' Axioms ' or of Motion. Lawg of Motion : I. Every body continues in its state of rest or of uniform 72 100 MECHANICS [CHAP. XI motion in a straight line except in so far as it is compelled to change that state by impressed force. II. Change of Motion is proportional to the impressed force and takes place in the direction of the force. III. To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. These Laws, or at all events the first two of them, are little more than the first explicit statement of ideas which were already generally, though vaguely, held. But it was an important step to have them clearly stated in a form which, in spite of many criticisms, still holds the field. The First is Galileo's * Principle of Inertia/ that a body has no power in itself to change its own state of rest or motion. The Second is the fundamental Law of Dynamics. Its full meaning and all that it implies will be discussed in Book II. The Third was perhaps the only absolutely new point in Newton's statement. So soon as it became necessary to calculate the movements of two bodies each of which attracted the other, the question arose " What is the relation between the two mutual attractions ? " Newton's answer was that the two attractions would be equal ; and he generalized the statement for forces of all kinds in his Third Law : " To every Action there is an equal and opposite Reaction." These laws have proved sufficient for the solution of all problems in Dynamics. All that has happened since has been a. mere matter of mathematical development of their consequences. With the Laws of Motion the historical evolution of the fundamental principles employed in Mechanics may be considered completed. BOOK II. MATHEMATICAL STATEMENT OF THE PEINCIPLES. INTRODUCTION. 101. WE have seen in Book I. how the fundamental principles of Mechanics were gradually won from experience by men of genius engaged in attempting to solve problems that either forced themselves on their attention by the practical importance of their consequences, as in the case of the Simple Machines, or attracted them by their own impressive grandeur and their bearing on questions of philosophy. Some of these principles can be mutually deduced from each other. They are equally valid as results of experience, and would serve equally well as the starting point of the subject. The particular order in which they arose was largely a matter of historical accident. We shall now give a more connected and precise statement of the subject, selecting that order which, after Newton, makes the Laws of Motion the starting point in experience of all the rest. And as we are to study motion as produced by force in real bodies, let us begin by clearing up our ideas about motion by itself apart from any consideration of what is moving or why it moves. This power of abstraction, or attending to one thing at a time, is of great value in science. Let a small mirror be held in the sun so that a spot of light is reflected on to the walls, ceiling, and furniture of a room. Even a perfectly regular turning of the mirror will set the spot moving with baffling variations both of speed and direction. When it passes from wall to ceiling, there is an instantaneous change of direction such as never happens to a heavy body, no matter what the force applied to it. We could study the position, velocity, and 104 MECHANICS change of velocity of such a spot, without any reference to the laws of motion according to which motion is found to arise and change in real bodies. This part of the subject, which deals with pure motion in the abstract, is called Kinematics. The part dealing with the motion of real bodies under the action of forces is called Kinetics. The two branches together are often called Dynamics. The special cases where the forces concerned happen to be in equi- librium are usually classed together under the title Statics. CHAPTER XII. KINEMATICS. 102. CLERK MAXWELL says : " The most important step in the progress of every science is the measurement of quantities. Those whose curiosity is satisfied with observing what happens have occasionally done service by directing the attention of others to the phenomena they have seen; but it is to those who endeavour to find out how much there is of anything that we owe all the great advances in our knowledge." In order to measure, or express the exact amount of any quantity, two things are required : (1) a unit, or standard quantity of the same nature as that to be measured ; and (2) a number to indicate how many such units or parts of a unit are contained in the given quantity. Thus a sum of money may be expressed as 20 shillings, or 4*86 dollars. But it would be impossible to convey to a stranger any idea of a sum of money unless we had previously come to an understanding as to the purchasing power of some definite amount, such as a shilling or a dollar, and could both of us count. The number required to express any given amount will evidently be greater the smaller the unit we employ, and vice versd. The measure of a quantity is inversely proportional to the unit in which it is expressed. 103. All the civilised governments have united in establishing an International Bureau of Weights and Measures in the Pavilion de Breteuil, in the Pare of St Cloud at Sevres, near Paris. Here are kept the standards of length and mass. 106 MECHANICS [CHAP. The unit of length is the International Metre, which is defined as the distance, at the melting point of ice, between the centres of two lines engraved upon the polished surface of a platiniridium bar, of a nearly X-shaped section, called the International Prototype Metre. The international metre is authoritatively declared to be identical with the former French metre, or metre des archives. This was intended to be one-ten-millionth part of a quadrant of a terrestrial meridian. . But as the value of a quadrant came to be more accurately determined, and moreover is changing, the actual bar constructed has been made the standard, and succeeding determinations of the quadrant are now expressed in terms of it. The accepted unit of length in all scientific works except those of British engineers, is the centimetre, or one-hundredth part of the standard metre. The British unit of length is the Imperial Yard which is the distance at 62 F. between the centres of two lines engraved on. gold plugs inserted in a bronze bar usually kept walled up in the Houses of Parliament at Westminster. The foot, or third part of the standard yard, is often employed as the unit in British works. For measuring great distances multiples of these units are used, such as the kilometre and the mile ; very small lengths are A DECIMETRE DIVIDED INTO CENTIMETRES AND MILLIMETRES. Jffl 1 2 3 INCHES AND TENTHS. Fig. 55. 1 metre = 39-37079 British inches. often expressed in submultiples such as the micron, or one- thousandth part of a millimetre, i.e. the millionth part of a metre. The relation between the two units is shewn in Fio\ 55. XII] KINEMATICS 107 104. The universal unit of time is the mean solar day or its Time one 86400th part, which is called a second. This is the time during which the earth turns on its axis through a certain small angle with reference to the fixed stars. Any time is measured by the number of seconds it contains. It will be seen that in measuring the speed of any body by the number of units of length it travels over in a unit of time, we are really comparing its motion with another motion, viz. that of the earth on its axis, just as we compare a length with another length. Should there be any change in the standard length or in the rate of the earth's rotation on its axis, our measures would lose their meaning. Clerk Maxwell suggests that those authors who think their works likely to outlast the present condition of the earth, would do well to express their lengths in terms of the wave-length of some particular ray in the spectrum, and times in terms of the periodic time of vibration of such a ray, quantities which we have every reason to believe will remain constant so long as the physical universe retains its identity. At the request of the French Government, Professor Michelson has determined the value of the standard metre in wave-lengths of the red, green, and blue rays of cadmium, and finds that 1 metre = 1,553,163-5 wave-lengths red ray = 1,966,249-7 green = 2,083,372-1 blue at 15 C. and 760 mm. pressure. 105. The position of a point in a straight line is fixed when we know its distance from some fixed point of Position. reference, or origin, in the straight line, and the direction in which this distance is to be measured. It is convenient to prefix the positive sign to all distances measured in one direction, e.g. towards the right if the line is horizontal, and the negative sign to all distances measured in the opposite direction (towards the left if the line is horizontal), from their respective starting points. A distance will thus be positive, even though it lies entirely to the left of the origin, provided it is measured towards the right. 108 MECHANICS [CHAP. With this convention, the algebraic sum of all the distances (with their proper signs) travelled by a point starting from the origin will always give us its position, and the sign of the sum will tell us whether it is to the right or left of the origin. Fig. 56. Thus if a man starts from a town 0, and walks 3 miles due east, his position at P is indicated by + 3. If he now walk 5 miles more to the east, he will arrive at Q, where OQ = + 3 + 5 = + 8. Let him now walk 6 miles westward. He will then be found at R where OR = + 3 + 5-6 = + 2. Finally let him continue westward for 5 miles. He will be at S t where 106. The position of a point in a plane may be fixed by Cartesian Co-ordinates, so called after their inventor Des Cartes, or by Polar Co-ordinates. (1) Cartesian Co-ordinates. Y M N X Y' Tig. 57. Cartesian Co-ordinates. XII] KINEMATICS 109 Two lines of reference, XOX' ', YOY', are chosen, usually at right angles. These are called the axes. Through any point P parallels to the axes are drawn,* cutting off lengths ON, OM. These are the co-ordinates of the point P. Lengths along YOY' are counted positive if measured upwards, and negative if measured downwards, from their starting points, whether the lengths them- selves be above or below 0. When ON, OM are known, the position of P is fixed by lines drawn through N and M parallel to the axes. (2) Polar Co-ordinates. The position of P may also be fixed by the distance OP and the angle POX through which OP must revolve from OX to reach P. Angles turned through in the opposite direction to that of the hands of a clock (counter-clockwise) are counted positive. Those turned through in the clockwise direction are negative. Since the point P is considered as carried through the angle 6 by the revolving radius OP, OP is called the radius vector. The radius vector and the angle are called the polar co-ordinates of P with reference to the pole 0. Two systems are employed for measuring angles in works on Trigonometry. The unit angle in one of them is the right angle, with its subdivisions into degrees, minutes, and seconds. In the other, the system of Circular Measure, the unit angle is the radian, i.e. the angle subtended at the centre of any circle by an arc equal to its radius. This is an angle of about 57 19'. Fig. 58. Polar Co-ordinates. This system is often convenient in Mechanics, especially for dealing with rotations, for the length s of the arc of a circle of 110 MECHANICS radius r described by P when the radius vector revolves through an angle whose circular measure is 0, is given by s = r0. 107. Definition. A point is said to move when it changes its position with reference to surrounding 1 objects, or Motion. i . i some particular object chosen for reference. The only motions known to us are thus relative motions. But this is no restriction, since in practic^ we are only interested in relative motions. We want to know for instance how to avoid a collision with another ship, or to strike a fort with a shell, and for all such purposes a knowledge of relative motion suffices. For most purposes motions are referred to the surface of the earth, in spite of its own rapid and complicated motion. In astronomy the sun is chosen for reference so long as we confine ourselves to the solar system. The motion of the sun itself is referred to the general body of so-called fixed stars. 108. Definition. The velocity of a point is the rate at which it is changing its place. Velocity. 3 . & r . The unit velocity is that of a point which passes over a unit length in a unit time. It is usually therefore a velocity of one foot or else one centimetre per second. Any other velocity is measured by the number of units of velocity it contains. This is the same as the number of units of length passed over in a unit of time, if the velocity be uniform. This may be determined ( 71) from the distance travelled in a very short interval of time, without waiting for a whole second. There is no difficulty in extending this notion to the more usual case where the velocity is variable, i.e. is changing from moment to moment. Let the interval of time considered be chosen smaller and smaller, but always so as to include the particular instant at which the velocity is to be estimated. The numbers representing the distance travelled and the time occupied in traversing it may thus be made vanishingly small, but their ratio, which measures the velocity, has a finite value however small they are made. Common experience has familiarized the idea of speed at a particular moment, independently of the length of time for XII] KINEMATICS 111 which it is maintained. Thus a train may pass a particular signal post at sixty miles an hour, and stop a few hundred yards beyond it. Everyone understands what is meant by the statement, and knows that if the speed had been maintained unaltered, the train would have covered sixty miles in the next hour. 109. Since a velocity is specified when we know its magnitude and its direction, it may be represented bv a Geometrical repre- ..,. _. . .", sentation of straight line. For the line may be drawn in the given direction, and of such a length as to re- present the magnitude on any convenient scale. It is convenient to use the term " speed " to indicate the magnitude of a velocity irrespective of its direction, velocity implying that the direction also must be taken account of. 110. Definition. The acceleration of a point is the rate at which it is changing its velocity. Acceleration. The unit acceleration is that of a point which gains one unit of velocity in one unit of time. It is usually there- fore an acceleration of one foot per second in a second, or of one centimetre per second in a second. Any other acceleration is measured by the number of units of acceleration it contains. This is the same as the number of units of velocity gained in a unit of time, if the acceleration be uniform. This may be determined from the velocity gained in a very short interval of time, without waiting for a whole second. The notion may be extended to variable accelerations, exactly as in the case of velocities, by considering the velocities gained in a vanishingly short interval of time. Acceleration thus stands to velocity as velocity stands to distance travelled, and, like velocity, may be represented by a properly drawn straight line. 111. We require formulae expressing the connection between The kinematic tne acceleration a, the velocity v at any time, the formulae. distance travelled s, and the time elapsed t. (1) Uniform Velocity. In this case there is but one formula, but care must be 112 MECHANICS [CHAP. taken on no account to use it in questions involving variable velocity. If a point move for t seconds with uniform speed v t the distance travelled s is given by s = vt, with its equivalents, s s v=- ; t = -. t v 112. (2) Uniform Acceleration. Let a be the acceleration. Then if the point start from rest, it will acquire a units of velocity in every second, and at the end of t seconds it will have a velocity v, where v = at (1). To find the distance travelled. The velocity at the middle moment (not the middle of the path), i.e. after t/2 seconds have elapsed, is -^ . Compare the actual motion of the point with the motion of a point which starts at the same instant with the velocity ^ , and maintains its speed unchanged throughout. For every moment in the first half of the time when the first point is moving more slowly than the second, there is a corresponding moment in the second half when it is moving just as much faster. So that in the end the two points will cover the same ground. Therefore s = (average velocity) x (time of motion) at 2" X * = i* 2 (2). Another form may be given to this result, which is important when we wish to connect the velocity acquired directly with the space passed over. As above, s = (average velocity) x (time of motion) v v , . = 5 x (since v = at) & a XII] KINEMATICS 113 y 2 We write this ^ = as ...................... . ....... (3). 113. If the point, instead of starting from rest, has an initial velocity u, these formulae admit of a simple modification. The effect of the acceleration in producing either new velocity, or extra distance travelled, or extra half-square of the velocity, has simply to be added to what is due to the initial velocity. Thus, corresponding to (Formulae for point initially at rest) (Formulae, initial vel. u) v = at, we have v = u + at, Otherwise thus : From the definition of acceleration v u a = - , . *. v = u + at. t Again, the average velocity in this case is Now s = (average velocity) x (time of motion) -!) - Also s = (average velocity) x (time of motion) v + u vu _ x\ ~ c. 114 MECHANICS [CHAP. EXAMPLES. 1. Remembering that a velocity of 60 miles an hour is equivalent to 88 feet per second, write down in feet per second velocities of 15, 20, 36 miles an hour; and in miles an hour velocities of 8, 11, and 40 feet per second. \J2. It takes light 3'315 years to come from the star a Centauri to tho earth. If the velocity of light is 186,000 miles per second, and the radius of the earth's orbit is 92,370,000 miles, express the distance of a Centauri in radii of the earth's orbit. Y>3. Taking the earth's orbit to be circular, find the mean velocity of the earth in its orbit. \^ 4. Find the velocity of a point at the equator due to the rotation of the earth on its axis, if the earth's radius is 3963 miles. 5. A bullet is fired through two screens 1 metre apart, and the interval required to pass from one to the other, as recorded on a chronograph, is 0036 second. Express its velocity in centimetres and feet per second. \^ 6. A steamer approaching a coast with vertical cliffs in a fog whistles, and the echo, as timed by a stop-watch, is heard after 8| seconds. One minute afterwards she whistles again and the echo is heard after 4f seconds. How far is she then off shore? How fast is she going? How soon will she strike if she goes on ? (Sound travels a mile in 5 seconds.) 7. An enemy's guns are heard 4f seconds after the flash. Express the range in yards, assuming the velocity of sound to be 1120 feet per second. Vs ^8. A military band marches off at the rate of 9 steps in 5 seconds, covering 2 feet 6 inches every step. When they have made 122 steps after passing a spectator, they appear to him to be exactly out of step with the music. What was the velocity of sound that day ? 9. A train moves from rest and after one minute has a velocity of 30 miles an hour. What is its acceleration ? 10. A body starts with velocity 30 and after 8 seconds has velocity 90. What is its acceleration ? 11. A body has acceleration 32 and starts with velocity 80. What is the velocity after 1, 4, and 10 seconds? 12. A stone dropped from a stationary balloon reaches the ground in 24 seconds. What was its velocity at the ground? XII] KINEMATICS 115 13. A stone is thrown vertically upwards with a velocity of 120 feet per second, the acceleration being 32 downwards. How soon will it be stationary ? Find its velocity after 3, 4, and 7 seconds. \J 14. What is the acceleration of a train whose speed increases from 20 to 30 miles an hour in 100 yards? 15. A train running 40 miles an hour has the brakes put on and reduces its speed to 20 miles an hour in 220 yards. What is the acceleration ? How much farther will it run before it stops? 16. (a) A bullet acquires a speed of 1600 feet per second while traversing a rifle barrel 4 feet long. Find the average acceleration. (6) The muzzle velocity of a revolver bullet is 600 feet per second, and the barrel is 8 inches long. Find the average acceleration. 17. A point moves 12 feet in 1 second and 18 feet the next. How long has it been moving with uniform acceleration from rest? What is its acceleration ? How far will it go in the next 10 seconds, and when will its velocity be 81 feet per second? 18. A body has initial velocity u and acceleration a. Find a formula for the space passed over in the nth second. 19. How long must a body travel with the acceleration of gravity before it acquires the velocity of light ? How far would it move in the time ? 20. A bullet is fired vertically upwards with a velocity of 1600 feet per second. After how many seconds will it return to the earth? What is the greatest height reached ? 21. How far must a body fall to acquire a speed of 400 metres per second ? 22. A velocity of 15 foot-second units is changed into 5 units while the body travels 50 feet. What is the acceleration ? What would it have been if the velocity had been changed to -5 in the same distance? How much longer must the acceleration have acted in the second case, and how much farther will the body have travelled? 82 CHAPTER XIII. KINETICS OF A PARTICLE MOVING IN A STRAIGHT LINE. THE LAWS OF MOTION. 114. IN dealing with the movements of real bodies about us produced by our own muscular efforts we know from experience that the effect produced by a given effort will depend largely on the body to which it is applied. So long as we are concerned with portions of the same substance, the size of the body determines the result, at all events approximately. Thus if a certain effort is required to project a stone with a certain speed, something like twice the effort will be needed to project in the same manner a stone of twice the size. But when we compare the effects of the same effort on two bodies of different nature, such as cork and lead, something else besides mere volume has to be considered. Newton gave to this " something " which determines the effect of an effort upon a body, the name " quantity of matter " in the body ; rather unfortunately, as has been said, because the definition seems to raise the question " what is matter ?" a question which has occupied philosophers from the earliest times without yet receiving a generally accepted answer. Newton himself immediately has to define how the " quantity of matter in a body " is to be estimated. He says that it is to be taken as the " product of the volume of the body and its density." But as the only way of determining the density is first to find the quantity of matter in a unit of volume, it is clear that we are landed in a logical circle. Fortunately the physicist is not bound to enter on the thorny paths of philosophy, at least at this point. He may content CHAP. XIIl] MASS AND FORCE 117 himself with the answer of the Oxford undergraduate, who, when asked "What is mind ?" replied "No matter"; "What is matter?" " Never mind." And yet we cannot study scientifically the movements of real bodies without being able to measure this quantity which deter- mines the motion that will be produced in them by a given effort. This implies that we shall be able to choose a unit quantity, and count the number of such units contained in a body, whether of cork, or lead, or any other substance. How is this to be done ? The mere volume, we have seen, will not help us to deal with different vsubstances. For shortness, and to avoid the misleading associations of the word matter, let us call the quantity, unchangeable so far as we know, which determines the effect of a given effort in producing speed in a body, the Mass of the body. And as Newton extended the ideas connected with our muscular efforts to all other cases where motion is changed by any means whatever, let us adopt his definition of Force. Force is anything which changes or tends to change a body a state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line. It might be supposed that though we cannot compare masses by comparing their volumes, yet we might do so by comparing their weights. And this, as Newton points out, happens to be true enough, at all events for comparisons made at the same place. But we must not assume that the weight of a body, which varies from place to place, and would be nothing at all at the centre of the earth, and only one-sixth as great at the surface of the moon, is a safe guide in measuring its mass, which no physical circum- stances known to us will suffice to change in the slightest degree. We must find some other test of the equality of two masses. If our object were to study the chemical properties of bodies, we might legitimately define equal quantities of two different substances as those which could neutralize the same amount of some standard reagent, such as sulphuric acid, if we could find one which acted on all substances; and the science could be logically built on such a definition. Our actual purpose in Mechanics is to study the effect of forces in producing motion. The proper test of the equality of two masses 118 MECHANICS [CHAP. is therefore to observe whether the same force produces the same mechanical effect on them. This indeed is the test we instinctively apply in practice. If, of two equal casks lying on a wharf, one is known to be full and the other empty, and we wish to find out which is which, we give each of them a kick or push, and the one which resists us most is the full one. Definition. Two masses are equal if the same force acting on each of them for the same time produces in each the same velocity. To be sure that we are applying the same force we might apply it by means of a spiral spring, taking care to pull it so that its extension remains the same throughout. If we may assume that the physical properties of the spring remain unchanged, then the force will be constant. Though this is not a practical form of experiment, it is theoretically sufficient, and this is all that is necessary for our present purpose, which is to conceive a test by which other masses may be set off equal to the standard. 115. Two such units or standards are. employed. (1) The International Kilogramme, which is the mass of a certain cylinder of platiniridium kept at Sevres, and intended to be identical with the former French kilogramme des Archives. In science it is generally the Gramme, or thousandth part of the kilogramme, which is taken to 'be the unit. The gramme was intended to be the mass of a cubic centimetre of water at its temperature of maximum density 3'93 C. The system of units which is based on the centimetre, gramme, and second, as units of length, mass, and time respectively, is called the C.G.s. system. (2) The Pound, which is the mass of a certain platinum weight, called the British Imperial Pound. According to Miller's determination 1 pound = 0'4535926525 kilogramme, 1 kilogramme = 2-204621 249 pounds. The mass of any other body is expressed by the number of such units of mass (pounds or kilogrammes) it contains. XIIl] COMPARISON OF MASSES 119 116. It is so important to keep clearly in mind the dis- tinction between the mass and the weight of a body, and also the method of testing the equality of two masses, that we will consider an example in detail. Suppose we wish to purchase a pound of sugar. Note that from Newton's point of view (mass = quantity of matter) we should be glad to have the mass as large as possible ; whereas the weight, i.e. the pull with which it tends towards the earth, is purely an inconvenience when it comes to carrying the sugar home, and we might be glad if it could be done away with, provided that the mass were not thereby diminished. To determine what is a pound of sugar, the shopman might set upon a long counter two little wheeled cars exactly alike in all respects. In one of these, according to our test, he should place a standard pound ; in the other a quantity of sugar. They should then be successively drawn along by means of a spring balance, care being taken that the reading of the balance always remained the same, and their progress timed. If the sugar were found to out-run the standard pound, more should be added ; if it fell behind, some taken away, until at last both cars were found to gain speed at the same rate. We should then have exactly one pound of sugar. A simpler way would be first to test two spring balances by locking them together, and observing whether their readings were equal when they were pulled apart. Then, drawing the two cars along simultaneously, one by each balance, we could observe which of them required the greater force to gain approximately the same speed, and adjust the amount of sugar till the balances gave the same reading during the experiment. Observe that the pound is not a force but a mass. The word is often employed to denote the force with which a pound tends downwards, i.e. the weight of a pound. When we specify a force by the number of pounds it would sustain, it is better always to use the correct but more cumbrous form, and speak of a force of so many pound- weights, except when there can be no possible danger of confusion. Having defined Force and Mass and seen how masses may be measured, we are ready to study the laws of motion as stated by Newton. 120 MECHANICS [CHAP. 117. Newton's Laws of Motion. Law I. Every body continues in its state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line, except in so far as it is compelled to change that state by impressed force. This is merely Galileo's principle of Inertia, by which is meant that a body has no power in itself of altering its own state of motion, whatever that may be, but can only change it in response to some force applied from outside. As we have seen ( 70), Galileo arrived at the law from the principle of continuity applied to the motion of a body down an inclined plane. It is distinctly contrary to the views generally held in his time, and by unobservant people to this day. 118. The full establishment of a principle of this kind generally consists of four stages : I. Observation] TT -r, . , \. Induction of the Law from facts. II. Jiixperiment j III. Deduction of Consequences of the Law. IV. Verification, by comparison of the consequences deduced with further observations of facts. The first of these stages is the most difficult, requires the greatest originality. To descry a new meaning in a fact whose very familiarity blinds our eyes to its significance, like Columbus- with the drift-weeds on the western shore ; to break away from inveterate prejudice to new points of view, like Copernicus; to catch in a flash of intuition the resemblance between remote facts, as when Bradley in his moving boat saw that the slant in the rain and the infinitesimal shift in the place of the fixed stars were akin, and so unravelled the aberration of light ; to divine in the falling apple the secret of the heavens ; this is the work of genius, of the poet's imagination, vivid in observation, fertile in surmise. Before a problem guesses come to most men, but in what surpassing measure to a Newton ! I. Once the guess is made, it must be tested. Sometimes, as in Astronomy, we can do no more than wait till the event 'can be observed again, as with the phenomena connected with total eclipses of the sun, and transits of Venus. XIII] THE FIRST LAW OF MOTION 121 II. Or we may have the facts under our control, and be able to repeat them at pleasure, varying the circumstances. Then we experiment, seeking to disentangle what is essential from what is indifferent, according to the canons laid down in works on logic. These two stages, Observation and Experiment, constitute the Induction of the law from the facts. III. In deducing the consequences which should follow, if the law be true, the instrument most generally employed in Physics is Mathematics, which is only a systematic method of applying common sense with ease and accuracy. IV. Finally the results of calculation are carefully compared with fresh observations. It not unfrequently happens that the theory leads to recondite consequences that would hardly have been stumbled on without its aid. Thus Fresnel's Undulatory Theory of Light enabled Sir W. R. Hamilton to predict the conical refraction in crystals, afterwards observed by Thomas Young working from his directions ; and Adams and Leverrier discovered Neptune from a consideration of the disturbances in the orbit of Uranus. Such startling and dramatic verifications lead to the rapid adoption of a principle, but its final acceptance depends on patient comparison of calculation with observation resulting in universal agreement in detail. 119. The First Law of Motion cannot be observed directly, because we cannot screen a body from the action of all forces and watch its behaviour. Nevertheless the stage of observation was fulfilled when Galileo divined it from motion on an inclined plane. For experiment, the more we do to remove retarding forces, the longer motion continues. Push a table along a rough floor. It comes to rest (through friction) the moment we cease pushing. Place its legs on castors, and it will -run a few inches after we let go. Set the wheels on rails, as in a railway truck, and once started it will travel a considerable distance. A block of ice thrown along a sheet of ice travels a very long way. Two equal weights suspended by a fine thread over a very lightly running pulley (Atwood's Machine, Fig. 61 a) balance each other. But if 122 MECHANICS [CHAP. set in motion, the system travels with almost uniform velocity for a long time. The inventions of the Perpetual Motion seekers are often good instances of approximation to the case of the First Law. The stages of Deduction and Verification for all the Laws of Motion find a superb illustration in the Nautical Almanac, This volume of 600 pages, published four years in advance, contains on every page many hundreds of predictions of the places of the sun, the planets, the satellites of the planets, and of the moon among the fixed stars ; and the dates, durations, place of commencement, path, and conclusion of eclipses, worked out to a degree of accuracy within the limits of error of the most sensitive modern instruments of precision. Every calculation is founded on the three Laws of Motion, applied to the averages of long series of corrected previous observations. Yet such is our confidence in their truth, that every ship captain unhesitatingly stakes his vessel on the results deduced from them ; and it is safe to say that if an astronomer, provided with the finest instrument in the world, observed even a minute departure from its calculated place in one of the heavenly bodies, it would never occur to him to doubt the laws of motion, but he would search for some unusual source of error in his instrument, or suspect a new and undetected cause of disturbance, as did Adams and Leverrier in the case of Neptune. 120. The First Law states that unless some force acts on a body from without, its motion continues unchanged. The Second Law tells us how the motion will be changed when a force acts on the body. Law II. Change of motion is proportional to the impressed force, and takes place in the direction of the force. By motion Newton does not mean velocity only, since the same force will produce very different changes of velocity in different masses. In measuring the quantity of motion we must there- fore take account of the mass moved as well as of the speed produced. We choose for unit quantity of motion the quantity of motion contained in one unit of mass moving with unit velocity. On the XIIl] THE SECOND LAW OF MOTION 123 British system this will be the quantity of motion possessed by one pound moving with a speed of one foot per second. M pounds moving one foot per second will contain M times as much, and if the M pounds are moving V feet per second, there will be V times as much again. So that M pounds moving V feet per second contain a quantity of motion represented by MV such units. It is time to have a single name for this recurrent phrase q uantity of . motion. Definition. The quantity of motion in a body is called its Momentum. It is measured by the product of the mass of the body into its velocity. No special name has been given to the unit of momentum. The word proportional, in Law II, is to be taken in its strict mathematical sense ; i.e. questions on the Second Law are to be worked out by Rule of Three, or Proportion. In measuring the impressed force we must take account not only of the magnitude of the force, but also of the time during which it acts; since the longer a force acts the greater is the change of motion it produces. The total effect of a force in producing change of motion is called its Impulse (i.e. total push). We choose as unit impulse the effect of unit force acting for unit time, i.e. for one second. P units of force acting for one second produce P units of impulse ; and if they continue acting for t seconds, there will be Pt units. 121. We can now state the Second Law as follows : Momentum produced is proportional to the Impulse of the Force acting, and is in the direction of the force. In algebraical symbols : MVvPt. The sign of variation, x , is inconvenient in this equation, and may be got rid of by a proper choice of units. Now we have already chosen the units of mass, velocity, and time. But nothing lias been said about the unit force. It is therefore open to us to choose a unit force, and we define it thus. 124 MECHANICS [CHAP. Definition. The unit force is that force which acting on unit mass for unit time produces in it the unit velocity. Let us calculate, by rule of proportion according to the Second Law, the velocity that will be produced when P units of force act for t seconds on M units of mass. By definition : 1 unit of force acting on 1 unit of mass for 1 second produces 1 unit of velocity. P units of force acting on 1 unit of mass for 1 second produce P units of velocity. P units of force acting on M units of mass for 1 second produce ~Tf units of velocity. P units of force acting on M units of mass for t seconds produce -jrj units of velocity. . V - Pt ~ M' Provided that we choose our unit of force as above, therefore, we may write and from this formula we can calculate either the velocity produced in a given mass by a given force acting for a given time: V=Pt/M ........................... (1), or the force required to produce a given velocity in a given mass in a given time : P = MV/t ........................... (2). 122. A very important particular case of (1) is that in which the force acts for one second ; for the velocity gained in one second measures the acceleration produced in the mass M by the force P. Thus a = P/M, P = Ma. 123. The simplest way of solving dynamical problems is to use this formula in conjunction with the Kinematical formulae of the last chapter. Thus : XIII] THE UNIT OF FORCE 125 Dynamical Formula Kinematical Formulae From rest Initial velocity u v = at v=u+at P _at 2 s = ut + ^- j- V 2 U 2 = h as In general, either the forces acting and the mass acted on are given, and it is required to find something about the speed gained or the distance run in a certain time ; or else some relation between time, speed, and distance is given, and it is required to find either the force acting or the mass moved, one of the two being known. In the former case we find a from the dynamical p formula a= -^ , and then use its value in the kinematical formulae. In the latter we begin by finding a from the kinematical formulae, p and then find P or M, whichever is unknown, from a = . 124. The unit of Force has been defined, but so far we have no means of comparing it with forces more familiar to us, such as the weight of a pound or of a gramme. This can only be effected by an experiment. (1) Unit force on the British system of units. We want to know what force acting on one pound for one second will give it a speed of one foot per second. Let a standard pound be dropped from a height, so that it is acted on solely by its own weight. At Greenwich it is found to acquire in one second a speed of 32*2 feet per second. ( 69.) The weight of one pound must therefore be 32'2 units of force such as we have chosen ; and our unit is the 32'2th part of the weight of one pound at the place where the experiment is tried. This unit is called the Poundal, or the British Absolute unit of Force, because its value is the same wherever the experiment 126 MECHANICS [CHAP. to determine it is tried. For if it be found that at some other place the speed acquired in one second of fall is different, for instance 3216 feet per second, then the weight of a pound, as measured by a spring balance, will also be found to be less at this place in the proportion 3216 to 32'20, so that the 3216th part of it leads to the same value of the unit. This value is about a half-ounce weight ; and whenever the p formulae a ^-, or MVPt are employed, forces, when given, must be expressed in poundals (by multiplying pound-weights by 32*2); and, when found, will come out in poundals, and can be converted to pound-weights by dividing by 32*2. (2) The c.G.S. system. A gramme acted on by its own weight is found at Paris to acquire a speed of 981 centimetres per second, in one second. The absolute unit of force on the C.G.S. system is therefore the -gsjth part of the weight of a gramme at Paris. This unit is called a Dyne (Svva/j,i,s = force). It is not far from the weight of a milligramme. All forces occurring in dynamical formulae must be expressed in dynes by multiplying gramme-weights by 981 ; and answers expressed in dynes can be converted back to gramme- weights by dividing by 981. 125. Weight is proportional to Mass. Galileo was led to disbelieve the common opinion of his time that heavy bodies fall more quickly than light ones. To settle the question he tried an experiment at the celebrated Leaning Tower of Pisa. Boxes of the same size and shape, but filled with different materials, were dropped from the summit, and, as he expected, were found to reach the earth at about the same moment, whether their contents were light or heavy. The slight outstanding differences he rightly referred to the resistance of the air, which has a greater proportional effect on the light bodies than on the heavy ones. Experiment. The student should verify this fact. Let an iron ball, and a wooden ball with an iron nail in it be supported by two small electromagnets attached to a wooden bar and drawn up to any height. If the same current be made to pass round XIII] WEIGHT PROPORTIONAL TO MASS 127 both magnets, the balls can be released simultaneously by breaking the circuit. The balls will reach the floor almost exactly together. Newton repeated this experiment in a striking form by dropping a guinea and a feather at the same moment in a long glass tube from which the air had been exhausted. The feather fell like the metal. A very important conclusion follows from this experiment. Since all bodies fall equally fast in vacuo, the acceleration must p be the same for each at every moment of the fall. Thus -^ is Jf the same for all bodies at the same place. But the only force acting on a falling body is its own weight. Therefore W/M is the same for all bodies, i.e. the weight of a body is proportional to its mass. We see now that masses may be compared by comparing their weights, a far more convenient method than that of 116. Since the acceleration produced by the weight of a body is the same for all bodies, i.e. g = 32'2, or 981, according to the system of units employed, we may write W/M = g; or W = Mg. 126. We will consider the experimental evidence for the Second Law after we have discussed the Third Law, meanwhile observing that both of them are abundantly verified by the calculations found in the Nautical Almanac. But before leaving the Second Law, we must note two important facts of experience not explicitly stated by it, but implied by its form. (1) It says nothing about the existing state of motion of the body acted on. The effect of a force in producing new velocity is found to be the same whether the body is at rest or already moving at high speed. Set two small objects on the edge of a table arid sweep a heavy paper-knife along the table so as to strike one of them horizontally towards the end of the room, while the other is merely dislodged. They will be heard to strike the floor at the same moment, the one at the foot of the table, the other many 128 MECHANICS [CHAP. feet away. If a rifle were fired horizontally so as just to dislodge an object at its muzzle, the bullet and the object would still strike the earth at the same moment, though perhaps many hundred feet apart. Mere speed in no way exempts a body from the action of gravity or any other force. (2) The Second Law makes no mention of any other forces that may be acting on the body at the same time. It is found that every force, however small, produces its whole effect, however great may be the other forces acting on the body. The attraction of a falling stone upon the earth has its full effect in modifying the earth's motion, although the earth is subject at the same time to the enormous attraction of the sun. Its motion is com- pounded of all those produced by the forces acting on it, including the slight pull of the stone. Newton was the first to state this explicitly in a corollary to the Second Law In his tract Propositions de Motu, which preceded the Principia, he says: "Corpus in dato tempore viribus conjunctis eo ferri quo viribus diversis in temporibus aequalibus successive." If two forces act simultaneously on a body, and if they would respectively produce the mo- tions AB, AC, when acting separately for the same interval of time, then the body will move in that interval to D, since the forces and the motions produced by them are indepen- D dent of each other. In the Principia the first Corollary to the Laws of Motion stands thus : " Corpus viribus conjunctis diagonalem parallelo- grammi eodem tempore describere, quo latera separatist The forces are supposed to be single impulses applied at A, in the directions AB, AC respectively, and sufficient to carry the body to B and C in equal times. The body will arrive at D, and must have come by the straight line AD, by Law I, for once started, it is not acted on by any force. In Corollary 2, Newton points out that Statics may be deduced XIII] THE THIRD LAW OF MOTION 129 from this principle, and illustrates it by deducing the Principle of the Lever. This is the first distinct formulation of the Parallelogram of Forces. We shall return to its formal proof later. 127. By the Second Law we can calculate the motion of any body when we know its mass and the forces acting on it. But these forces are applied from without by other bodies. They are pushes, or pulls, or attractions, and there is always a reaction upon the body that pushes or pulls. What is the relation between the forces mutually exerted upon each other by any two bodies ? Newton's answer to this question is given in his Third Law. Law III. To every Action there is an equal and opposite Reaction. Pressure and counter-pressure, action and counter-action are equal. All force is of the nature of a stress, that is, a mutual action between two bodies, the same from whichever side it is looked at. You cannot exert a pressure unless you meet with a resistance, and then the pressure and the resistance grow side by side, being always equal. You cannot cut a piece of paper with one blade of a pair of scissors, nor crack a nut with one half of a pair of nutcrackers. You cannot drive a nail into a board unless it is supported behind, for the board yields before the pressure is great enough to force the nail in. A cannon ball can exert no force till it meets with an obstacle, and then only so great a force as that with which it is resisted. You cannot pull an object harder than it pulls back. 128. Beginners are liable to a difficulty in admitting this. They say : " Why then does any object ever succeed in moving any other at all ? " Newton himself considers the case of a horse drawing a cart. No more instructive problem can be found, so we will examine it in some detail. According to the Third Law the cart pulls the horse backwards as hard as the horse pulls the cart forwards. Everyone will admit that if a spring dynamometer is employed to measure the tension of the traces, it does not matter which end is attached to c. 9 130 MECHANICS [CHAP. the horse, and which to the cart. The reading will be the same. Then how is it that they ever get into motion ? The difficulty brings out a very important point. In attacking any mechanical problem it is essential to begin by fixing upon the system whose rest or motion we are going to consider. We may make it include one body, or a collection of bodies, or the whole universe; but we must be clear as to what it is. In the case of the horse and cart ; is it wished to know why the cart advances ? or why the horse advances ? or why they both advance ? Let us begin with the cart. The cart is, then, the system whose motion is to be determined. It is to be supposed isolated in our minds from all other objects, as in an imaginary enclosure acbd. Fig. 60. Let M be its mass. Let us now go round the enclosure and see what forces act on it. When we know the forces and the mass, the Second Law of Motion will tell us what will be its movements. (1) The earth exerts two forces on the cart, (a) an attraction, which is the weight W of the cart ; and (b) an upward pressure P at the point where the wheel rests on the ground. To each of these, by Law III, there is an equal and opposite force exerted by the Xlll] PROBLEM OF THE HORSE AND CART 131 cart upon the earth. But with these latter forces we are not con- cerned at the moment, since we are not considering the motion of the earth, but of the cart. The upward pressure (b) is also equal to the downward pull of the weight (a) ; for if it were greater than the weight, the cart would rise into the air, and if it were less, the cart would sink into the ground, as in fact it does on soft ground, till the resistance becomes equal to the weight. These forces therefore balance, and may be left out of our account. (2) The tension of the traces acts forwards. (Observe that there is never any difficulty in deciding which way a tension or pressure acts, if we are clear as to which is the body whose motions we are studying.) Let the tension be T. (3) The only other forces acting on the cart are certain frictions and resistances, at the axles, on the ground, and against the air. For simplicity, let us suppose that these are equivalent to a direct pull by a rope, backwards, of magnitude R. Now provided the tension T be greater than the resistance R, there will be a balance of force T R forwards, and the cart will begin to move, for it will be subject to an acceleration forwards, *-T-; W Next consider the horse. Let his mass be m, and draw an imaginary enclosure round him as before. The forces acting on him through this enclosure are : (1)- His weight, and the upward pressure of the earth, which so long as he stands still will balance as in the case of the cart. (2) If he tries to go forwards, there will be a tension of the traces pulling him backwards ; and this, by the Third Law, will be exactly equal to T, the forward tension of the traces upon the cart. But where is the external force which is required by Law II to make him go forwards? He cannot exert it upon himself. This is implied by Law II, and explicitly stated by Law I. No man can raise himself by pulling at his own boot-straps, or if 92 132 MECHANICS [CHAP. seated on a chair, by lifting at the lower rails. It must come from outside, from some other object. Accordingly the horse, besides maintaining the downward pressure necessary to support his weight, thrusts the earth back- wards; and by Law III the earth immediately thrusts him forwards with an equal reaction. Let this be F. So, too, the skater, gripping the ice with the sharp edge of his skate, gives a back-thrust, and is himself driven forwards; and the swimmer advances by thrusting back a wedge of water from between his legs. If the horse thrusts back hard enough, F will be greater than T ; and he will begin to move with an acceleration a -*=* (2) m Thus although the back -pull on the horse is the same as the forward pull on the cart, both will advance provided that F is greater than T, and T than R. Assuming that we know the force with which the horse thrusts, F', the resistances to motion, R ; and the masses M y m\ we ought to be able to solve the problem completely, and find at what rate motion will ensue. But we have at present only two equations to find three unknowns, viz. the two accelerations, and the tension of the traces. It will be found that there is always a dynamical equation for each of the accelerations. If no unknown reaction, such as the tension, comes in, this will be sufficient. But wherever a reaction of this kind occurs, it must be in con- sequence of some connection between the parts of the system, whereby they have to move in a certain definite relation to each other. That is, for every unknown reaction there will be a geo- metrical equation, expressing the special relation of the parts of the system which gives rise to the reaction. Thus there will always be enough equations to ensure a definite solution. In the present case, so long as the traces hold, the horse and cart have to advance together, so that the two accelerations are equal. Hence a 1 = a 2 (3). F-T T-R Xlll] SOLUTION OF A DYNAMICAL PROBLEM 133 m MF+mR Whence T = ,, - , M + m and by substitution, MF+mR T-R M+m M M = F-R M + m' Substitution in (2) would of course give the same value for a a . Finally, let us consider the horse and cart as one system. The imaginary enclosure must now be drawn round the two together. The only unbalanced forces acting on the system from without will now be the forward thrust of the earth, F, and the back-pull of the resistances, R. The weights and the upward thrusts of the earth balance as before. The mass to be acted upon is the total mass of the horse and cart. Hence the acceleration of the whole system will be F-R The former result can thus be written down directly when a knowledge of the tension is not required. What has become of the tension in this case ? It is no longer an external force, but a mere internal reaction between two parts of the system, which can no more affect its motion as a whole than any of the other forces which hold the parts of the cart and .the frame of the horse together. It does not therefore enter into the equations. On the other hand, the tension can only be found by considering the motion of the two parts, between which it occurs, separately. 129. The solution of any dynamical problem by Newton's method involves no principle which has not been illustrated in the elementary question we have been discussing. The rest is mere elaboration of mathematics to meet the complexities in- troduced by changes in the direction of motion, or of force in curved orbits, or the number of bodies or parts interacting on each other. The process consists of: 134 MECHANICS [CHAP. (1) writing down the Equations of Motion, i.e. equations expressing the accelerations of the different bodies concerned in terms of their masses and the forces acting on them ; (2) writing down the geometrical equations defining the relative movements of parts which exert reactions on each other ; and (3) solving the equations. EXAMPLES. 1. Shew that if a train travelling at 60 miles an hour is suddenly brought to 'rest by a head-on collision, a passenger facing the engine will strike the opposite wall of the carriage as if he had fallen on to it from the top of a tower 121 feet high. 2. A rain drop experiences a resistance from the air proportional to the square of its velocity. Hence shew that there is a limit to the velocity it can acquire, and that after this terminal velocity is reached the drop falls with uniform velocity. 3. Find the acceleration : (1) in foot-second units when (a) a force of 12 poundals acts on a mass of 2 Ibs, (b) a force of 14 pounds weight acts on 112 Ibs. (2) in c.G.s. units when (a) a force of 10,000 dynes acts on a mass of 80 gms. (6) a force of 10 pounds weight acts on 20 kilograms. 4. What force (in poundals) is required to produce an acceleration of 12 ft. -sec. units in masses of 2 Ibs. ; 12 ozs. ; 112 Ibs.? Express these forces in pound-weights. 5. How many dynes must act on 2 kilograms to produce an acceleration of 8000 C.G.s. units? Express this force in gramme-weights. 6. Find the mass acted on when : (1) a force of 3 pounds weight causes an acceleration of 1, 36, and 96 British units respectively ; (2) a force equal to the weight of 10 gms. causes an acceleration of 196 C.G.s. units. 7. A force equal to the weight of 3 Ibs. acts on a mass of 2 kilograms for 10 seconds. Find the velocity acquired and the distance travelled, in C.G.S. units. XIII] KINETICS 135 8. An engine pulls a train of 200 tons mass with a force equal to the weight of a ton and a half. Find the acceleration ; the speed acquired (a) in half a minute, and (6) in half a mile ; the distance run in 5 minutes j and the time required to run the first two miles. 9. A train of 120 tons mass running 45 miles an hour is pulled up by the brakes in half a mile. What is the retarding force of the brakes in ton- weights ? 10. A train has its speed reduced from 40 to 20 miles an hour in 400 yards. What is the resistance of the brakes in pounds per ton-weight of the train 1 How far and how long will the train continue to run before it stops ? 11. What force is required to stop a train of 100 tons going 30 miles an hour (1) in half a minute, (2) in half a mile 1 12. A one-ounce bullet is fired from a rifle barrel 4 feet long with a speed of 1600 feet per second. What was the average pressure of the powder on the bullet? 13. A 600 Ib. cannon ball is fired from a gun weighing 12 tons with a velocity of 2000 feet per second. If the gun is free to move, with what velocity will it start backwards? (By the Third Law the pressure on the gun must throughout the explosion be equal and opposite to that on the shot. Hence the momentum of the gun must be equal and opposite to that of the shot.) 14. A half-ounce bullet in passing through a 2-inch plank has its velocity reduced from 900 to 600 feet per second. Find its acceleration in the plank, and hence the average resistance offered to it. What thickness of plank would have just stopped it ? 15. A curling stone is projected along ice with a velocity of 48 feet per second. Express the resistance due to friction as a decimal of the weight of the stone, if it stops (1) in 300 feet, (2) in 15 seconds. 16. A slinger using a sling 2 ft. 6 in. long whirls a stone weighing 2 ounces in a nearly horizontal circle above his head, so as to make 5 revolu- tions per second. What is the tension of the string? (Calculate first the acceleration of the stone to the centre by 77.) 17. How many times faster must the earth turn on its axis so that objects at the equator should just lose their weight? 18. If a train of 200 tons were to run at 60 miles an hour at the equator, what difference would it make in the pressure on the rails if the train were to run due west instead of due east ? 19. A bicyclist is running at 20 miles an hour round a circular track with four laps to the mile. What should be the inclination of his machine to the vertical ? 20. A fly-wheel with a rim weighing 10 tons has a diameter of 6 feet, and runs at 160 revolutions per minute. If there are six spokes, what pull has each spoke to bear in preventing the rim from flying to pieces? CHAPTER XIV. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE LAWS OF MOTION. ATWOOD'S MACHINE. 130. THE Laws of Motion may be tested directly by means of Atwood's Atwood's Machine. This consists of a light pulley Machine. Q f a i umm i um ^ balanced very truly on its axis, and supported on a set of friction wheels to reduce the friction as much as possible. A cord passes over it and carries two equal weights, one of which runs in front of a vertical scale. At the zero of the scale is a hinged platform which is pulled flat against the scale by a spring on withdrawing a catch. A clock beating seconds is arranged to withdraw the catch electrically at the instant when the minute hand passes the mark 60" at the top of the dial. On the scale are two moveable platforms, the upper one being a hollow ring through which the weight can pass, the lower a solid plate which brings it to rest. Small weights are provided, con- sisting of flat brass slips which can rest on the top of the main weights, but are too long to pass through the ring-platform. One of the Atwood Machines, figure 61, is for use in Lecture Demonstrations. It has a scale of 750 centimetres ; and to equalize the weight of thread on each side, an idle thread hangs in a loop from the bottoms of the moving weights. This also gives the experimenter control of the machine from below. The other Machine, figure 61 a, constructed by the Cambridge Scientific Instrument Company, is for accurate work. It has a steel scale/with geometrical contact adjustments for the platforms and fine CHAP. XIV] ATWOOD'S MACHINE 137 screw motions for setting them accurately. The times of release and of passing each of the platforms are recorded electrically on a chronograph, and the mov- ing weight is brought to rest in a dashpot at the bottom of the scale column. A weight suspended by a spiral spring vibrates verti- cally, giving seconds on the chronograph. 131. When only the First Law * wo equal large of Motion. we i g h ts are uge( J ) there is no unbalanced force tending to set up motion. They will be found to rest in any position, and, if set in motion, they travel uni- formly, passing over the same number of centimetres in every second, except for an almost inappreciable loss of speed through friction. 132. Place one of the second Law small flat weigh ts of Motion, across the top of the large weight. Let the masses of the large and small weights be M and m. The only unbalanced force acting on the system is the weight of m. The total mass to be set in motion is 2M + m. Fig. 61. 138 MECHANICS [CHAP. Fig. 61 a. XI V] ATWOOD'S MACHINE 139 By the Second Law of Motion there should be an acceleration As this is a constant acceleration, the distance run in t seconds at 2 from rest will be s = -=- , and the velocity acquired v = at. If the weights have been weighed beforehand, a may be calculated, and the values of s and v found for, say, 3 seconds. The ring-platform should be set at the distance s below the zero, and the lower platform near the bottom. Pass the weight carrying the small weight above the top platform ; set the platform and lower the weight on to it. On starting the clock the platform will be heard to fall at the beginning of a minute, and the cross weight will be caught by the ring almost exactly at the third following tick. The seconds should then be counted till the last platform is reached. After passing the ring-platform the system is not acted on by any unbalanced force, so that its velocity is uniform. It may be found by dividing the distance between the two lower platforms by the number of seconds required to pass from the one to the other. By repeated trials the platforms may be set so that the passage of the weights through them coincides with a tick of the clock, and no fractions of a second need be estimated. Besides moving the large weights and itself, the small weight has to set in motion the aluminium pulley. This can be allowed for by supposing that an extra small mass x must be set moving, so that Using a different small weight ra', we find a different acceleration, , m'g . "ZM+m' a and of may be determined by experiment with the machine, and x is then found from (1) and (2). A third experiment should be tried with still another weight ra". The formula with the value of x substituted in it should then give correct results for s and v. 140 MECHANICS [CHAP. 133. The weights and the middle platform are removed from the machine. The top platform is set, and any To find the . r . * Dynamical unit of small object placed upon it. The lower platform is placed at 490 cm., and the clock is started. The small object is heard to strike the platform exactly at the first tick after the top platform falls. Its average velocity must be 490 cm. per second, and therefore the velocity at the end of one second is 980 cm., or 82 -2 feet per second. Thus Galileo's experiments at the tower of Pisa may be verified ; and since the object might have been a gramme or pound weight, the unit force must be the 1 /980th part of a gramme weight, or the l/32'2th part of a pound weight according to the system of units adopted. ( 124.) 134. The problem of Atwood's machine is the same as that of Third Law of ^ e horse and cart ( 128), with the descending Motion. weights substituted for the horse, the ascending weight for the cart, and the string for the traces. We have treated the weights as one system, since only the acceleration was needed. If the tension T of the string is to be found, the accelerations a and of must be calculated separately. Thus ....... (1) ' M + m T-Mg a = a? ....................................... (3). Whence T _*(M+*)lfg 2M +m t tna a =mr^> as before. In arriving at this correct result, we have assumed that the string transmits equal and opposite action and reaction T between the ascending and descending weights, so that the Third Law is verified. The advantage of Atwood's Machine is that it enables us to xiv] ATWOOD'S MACHINE 141 work with a constant acceleration which may be any small fraction of gravity we choose according to the value of m/(2M + m). It is easier to observe the slower motion, and the two platforms afford convenient means of measuring the acceleration during the first part of the motion, as well as the final velocity acquired. EXAMPLES. 1. The large weights in an Atwood's Machine are each 223 gms. The rider is 13 '4 gms. How many centimetres below the stage must the ring- platform be set so as to be reached in 2 seconds ? How far below this must the last platform be set so as to be reached 8 seconds afterwards ? 2. With the above weights the ring-platform is set so as to be reached in 3 seconds, when it is found that the lowest platform must be set 429 cms. below it, in order to be reached 5 seconds afterwards. Hence find the value of gravity. 3. In an experiment with the weights in Question 1, it is found that the ring-platform must actually be set at 55-3 cms. below the zero in order to be reached in 2 seconds. On the assumption that the effect of the mass of the pulley, which has also to be set in motion, is equivalent to the permanent addition of a small mass x to the two large weights, an experiment was tried with another rider weighing 27 gms. The platform had then to be set at 108 - 3 cms. to be reached in 2 seconds. From these two experiments find x and the value of gravity. 4. A mass of 10 Ibs. is placed on a smooth table and connected, by a string passing over a smooth pulley at the edge, with a weight of 2 Ibs. hanging freely. Find the acceleration of the system. How far from the edge must the 10 Ib. weight be placed so as to fall off in 2 seconds ? 5. Find the tension of the string in Question 1 (before and after the ring- platform is reached) and in Question 4. CHAPTER XV. WORK AND ENERGY. 135. THE Newtonian method of solving dynamical problems begins by fixing the rate at which the velocity changes, i.e. the acceleration, by means of the formula a = P/M. From this it proceeds to calculate what will be the velocity, and where the body will be at every succeeding instant, by the kinematical formulae : v = at and s = atf/2, or their proper modifications if the acceleration is variable. 136. For many purposes we do not need to follow the motion with such intimate scrutiny, but are content to fix our attention on the final velocity acquired when some other position is reached, disregarding what has gone on meanwhile. This we can do by means of the third kinematic formula v*/2 = as, or its dynamical equivalent obtained by multiplying both sides by the mass M. Thus Mv*l2 = Mas = Pxs (1). This formula tells us what speed will be acquired by a mass M, when a force P pushes it steadily through a distance s ; or, if the mass be already in motion with given velocity v, and the force P be employed to stop it, it tells us how far the force will be driven back, before the body is brought to rest, viz. s = Mv*/2P. The product P x s on the right-hand side of (1) has already received a name. It is the work done by the force P while the body travels the distance s. ( 45.) CHAR XV] WORK AND ENERGY 143 137. A body or system on which work has been done is found to have an increased power of doing work itself, that is, of producing physical changes in other bodies. It is therefore said to possess more energy than before. This energy may take two forms. 138. The body may have been set in motion with regard to i. Energy of other bodies. By the first law of motion it will then continue in motion until some resisting force is employed to stop it. Let it be brought to rest by the constant force P in a distance s. Before it stops, it does a quantity of work P x s, and since it appears that the work done by a body of mass M and velocity v before it can be brought to rest is measured by Mv 2 /2. The quantity of work which the moving body can do in virtue of its motion is called its Kinetic Energy, or energy of motion, and is measured by 139. That motion confers on a body a certain "efficacy" or power of overcoming opposing forces, and producing Energy and changes in other bodies was of course a familiar fact. For a long time a controversy raged between the followers of Des Cartes and Leibnitz as to whether this " efficacy " of the body was proportional to the velocity or to the square of the velocity. The dispute is seen to be meaningless if we compare the Newtonian formula, MV Pt, (Momentum) (Impulse) with the energy formula, first employed by Huyghens, (Energy) (Work done) Given a mass M moving with a velocity V. The first formula tells us how long (t = MV/P), the second how far (s = MV 2 /2P) it will continue to move against a given force P, before it can be brought to rest. 144 MECHANICS [CHAP. Conversely the two formulae respectively give the time and the distance required by the force P to produce in M, initially at rest, the velocity F. Thus both the Cartesians and the Leibnitzians were right. The time during which a moving body will go on overcoming a given resistance is proportional to its velocity, the distance to the square of its velocity. A body thrown vertically upwards, and then again with twice the speed, will in the second case rise for twice as long a time, but four times as high as before. A moving body is just a moving body, and its effects can be calculated when we know its mass and its velocity. In making the calculations we often have to reckon the product Mv\ often again the product Mv*/2 ; so often, in fact, that it is worth while to denote them by the special names Momentum, and Energy. But it must not be supposed that these are occult properties of the body, which may sometimes exhibit one, and sometimes the other. Every moving body has both Momentum and Energy, i.e. we can calculate both. MV and MV 2 /2 for it. Which of the two we should choose, depends on the purpose we have in view. 140. Let us compare in respect of momentum and energy an ironclad of ten thousand tons mass, so nearly at rest that it is moving only one inch per second, with a one-ounce bullet moving 1600 feet per second. (1) Momentum - MV. This is For the ironclad 2240 x 10,000 x 1/12 = 1,866,666-6 British units bullet 1/16x1600 =100 (2) Energy = MF 2 /2. 1 ft ftftft v 994ft For the ironclad - ~~ - x (1/12) 2 = 77,777"? foot-poundals. bullet x =80,000 The ironclad has enormously greater momentum than the bullet ; but the bullet has rather the greater energy. To understand precisely what this means, let us suppose that each has to be brought to rest by holding against it a perfectly hard shield with a steady force of, say, 1000 poundals. We may XV] WORK AND ENERGY 145 ask; (1) How long will each go on pushing the shield back? Or (2) How far? /n\ a- j/rTT- Txt xi. f momentum (1) Since MV= Pt; therefore t = force For the ironclad t = 1>86 1 6 '^ 6 ' 6 = 1,866'6 seconds. 1UUU bullet * = j5 =1/10 second. (2) Since MV 2 /2 = P.s', therefore s = force 77 777'? For the ironclad s = ' = 77' 1 ? feet. 1UUU bullet , = The bullet will be brought to rest in the tenth part of a second, whereas the ironclad will creep on for more than half an hour. Nevertheless the bullet will push the shield back through 80 feet, as against 77*7 feet for the ironclad. This is easily understood. For the average speed of the bullet, which decreases uniformly from 1600 feet per second to nothing, is 800 feet per second. That of the ironclad is half an inch per second. The bullet in one-tenth of a second travels its 80 feet, while the ironclad only creeps over 77' 1 ? feet in its half hour. 141. Although a body on which work has been done may be ii Energy of at rest > there mav have been a change in its Position. position with regard to other bodies ; or in its shape, that is, the position of its own parts with regard to each other. And in consequence of this change it may be capable of doing more work than before, i.e. possess more energy. To raise a one-pound clock-weight through a height of three feet, three foot-pounds of work must be done. The weight has then been drawn apart a distance of three feet from the earth against the attraction of gravity. The " system," consisting of the earth and the weight separated from it, has the power of doing this work back again ; for, if allowed to run down, the weight will do so, and drive the clock for a long time. The three foot-pounds c. 10 146 MECHANICS [CHAP. of work have thus been stored up in the system, which possesses three foot-pounds of energy more than it had before. This is often called the energy of the clock-weight, but it should never be forgotten that the energy really resides in the system, earth-and- clock weight, and is due to the relative separation of its parts against the force of gravity acting between them. Similarly, the water in a lake or mill-dam can do work if allowed to fall to a lower level ; to the amount of one foot-pound for every pound of water that descends a vertical height of one foot. Again, work must be done to wind up a watch-spring, or bend a bow. The coiled watch-spring and the bent bow possess an equivalent amount of energy, and will do the work back again if allowed to unbend. In these cases the particles on the inner side of the spring or bow have been forced together, and those on the outer side drawn apart, against the elastic forces of cohesion that hold the bow together. When the constraint is released, these forces bring the particles of the bow back to their positions of equilibrium, and thus do upon the arrow the work that was stored up in the bow by the force used in bending it. The arrow leaves the bow with the corresponding amount of kinetic energy, which, again, it can give up only on meeting some obstacle, or otherwise experiencing a force from the action of some body not moving at the same rate. 142. The name Potential Energy has been given to that form of energy, or capacity for doing work, which is due to a mutual displacement of objects or parts of an object against the forces which hold them together. It is quite possible that all forms of energy, including those now classed as Potential, may ultimately be reduced to cases of kinetic energy. Meanwhile the word Potential must not be misunderstood to mean that this form of energy is not really energy at all, but only something which may become energy, if allowed to convert itself into the kinetic form. 143. No formula can be given for the calculation of Potential energy, so universally applicable as the expression M F 2 /2 for the XV] WORK AND ENERGY 147 energy of a moving body. But very often it can be reckoned easily. The potential energy of raised weights is at once ex- pressed in foot-pounds by multiplying the number of pounds by the height in feet through which they are to fall. In the case of elastic bodies, we often know the force which was employed in producing the distortion. Thus if we know the average force used in drawing the bow, and the length of the arrow drawn, the product gives the energy stored in the bent bow. 144. Wherever bodies are in motion under the action of forces, work is being done, and equivalent amounts of energy stored in the system or expended. Mechanical processes, indeed, may be regarded as cases of the transfer of energy from one body or system to another, or transformations from one of its forms to another. Every such transfer involves the exertion of a force while the body moves over a certain distance. We may at our pleasure either (1) regard the transfer of the energy as the result of the work done by the force, and measure it by the product of the force into the distance moved, P x s ; or (2) consider the force a manifestation of the transfer of energy. From this point of view the force is measured by the quotient of the energy transferred, or work done, divided by the distance moved, i.e. the force is the space-rate of transfer of energy. (1) In drawing a bow the archer exerts a force on the arrow and draws it through its length. He does Illustrations of . the Transfer of work, which is stored as potential energy in the bent bow, in virtue of the relative displacement of its parts. When the arrow is released, the bow does this work on the arrow, exerting a force on it by means of the string, while the arrow moves its length. The energy is thus transferred to the arrow, and at the same time transformed from potential to kinetic energy, due to the motion of the arrow relative to the earth, including the bow and other surrounding objects. The energy cannot be transferred again until the arrow meets some object, relatively at rest, which can exert a force upon it; but if the arrow is rising against gravity, part of its kinetic energy will be transformed into potential energy; so that at every moment of its flight it possesses, in place of the kinetic energy it has lost, 102 148 MECHANICS [CHAP an equivalent amount of potential energy, due to its separation from the earth against its weight (2) In the common pendulum the transformation of energy from the potential to the kinetic form, and back again, takes place at every swing. The energy is first stored in the pendulum, when it is drawn aside by the exertion of force, as potential energy measured by the product of the weight of the bob into the vertical height above the lowest position. During the descent the potential energy is gradually converted into equivalent energy of motion, and has become entirely kinetic at the bottom of the swing. At each point of the descent the sum of the kinetic and potential energies is the same. During the ascent the kinetic energy is expended as the pendulum climbs against gravity, and when it reaches the same height on the other side, the whole of it has again been converted into potential energy, and the swing re- commences. This process might be repeated indefinitely but for frictions and resistances, hitherto left out of consideration, which absorb a small quantity of energy in each swing. It is the business of the descending clock-weight to supply this small loss by means of the escapement, and so maintain the swing. The energy of the clock-weight, again, is supplied by the work done in winding it at intervals. (3) A similar instance in which it is easier to trace the force exerted during the transfer of energy, is found in At wood's Machine ( 131), when the two equal weights A, B are allowed to run alone, and therefore uniformly. No change is taking place in the kinetic energy of either weight. But the potential energy of the descending weight A, with regard to the earth, is decreasing ; and that of the ascending weight increasing at the same rate. The force effecting the transfer is the tension of the string, which is doing work against the one, and an equal amount of work upon the other. 145. Many mechanical processes depend upon the storing of storage of energy in some system, by doing work upon it, Energy. an( j ^hen a li owm g the system to give up the work either suddenly or slowly according to convenience. XV] WORK AND ENERGY 149 Thus the clock-weight or watch-spring is wound up in a few seconds, and gives out its stored energy slowly, during eight days or twenty-four hours. The bow gives out its energy almost instantaneously, exerting the same force on the arrow as that used by the archer in drawing it, but following up the arrow, as its speed increases, far more swiftly than the archer could have done, besides enabling him to do the hard work at leisure, and then concentrate his attention on the aim. The Hammer enables us to exert a much greater force than we could unaided. Let us suppose that a hammer-head weighs one pound, and that we draw it down by the handle with a force of ten pounds-weight, through a vertical height of two feet, on to the head of a nail. What must have been the pressure exerted on the nail, if we find it is driven in half an inch by the blow ? During the descent both the pull of gravity (1 pound) and the force (10 pounds) have been doing work, so that energy has been stored in the hammer-head to the extent of 11 x 2 foot-pounds. It is in the form of kinetic energy at the moment of striking ; and assuming that it is all taken up in overcoming the resistance of the nail (average value = R), while the nail recedes half an inch ( = ^4 ft.), we have Rx ^ ? = 11x2. .'. R = 528 pounds- weight. This is the resistance required to exhaust the kinetic energy of the hammer in half an inch. But the weight of the head continues to act during the process, and if the force of 10 pounds is also applied, we must add 11 pounds more, so that the total average pressure must have been 539 pounds. This is the dead weight which the nail could just support without being driven in. The Punching Machine is a machine for punching holes through thick plates of metal. At first sight it is difficult to conceive of any tool being driven with such force as to cut a J-inch hole through an inch plate of cold steel quickly and quietly. It is easily done as follows. The tool is attached to the short end of a lever whose long end is forced up by a cam, or projection on a wheel, which only comes round once in every seven or eight 150 MECHANICS [CHAP. revolutions of the engine which drives the machine. During six or seven strokes the engine does work on a heavy fly-wheel, and when the cam comes round, the whole of the kinetic energy stored in the now rapidly revolving wheel is brought to bear on the tool. When it comes in contact with the plate one of three things must happen. Either (1) this energy must disappear, the machine being suddenly brought to rest without equivalent work done ; or (2) the machine must break ; or (3) the plate must be punched. But the laws of motion will certainly not fail ; and it is the business of the manufacturer to make the machine strong enough not to break. The only alternative is that the plate must be punched; and accordingly it is. 146. Heavy fly-wheels are used for another purpose, to ensure Regulation of the the steady running of an engine. The steam does supply of Energy. work on foe piston at very different rates at dif- ferent parts of the stroke ; and at the beginning and end of the stroke, the two dead points, no work is being done at all. If the engine were coupled directly to the machinery of a factory, each machine would run in a series of jerks; and should one or two machines be disconnected or brought into action, the speed of all the rest would be suddenly and seriously affected. But if a very heavy fly-wheel be attached to the shaft, the engine pumps energy into it at a rate varying throughout the stroke, but the machines draw off their supply from the large store accumulated in the wheel. The energy of such a wheel can be calculated ( 260) when its mass, dimensions, and speed are known. It is then easy to design a wheel whose energy at the normal speed shall be any number of times the whole amount supplied by the engine during one stroke; so that the speed cannot vary during the stroke by more than a small fraction, and will not change very greatly even if a number of extra machines be suddenly thrown in or out of gear. The water supply of a large town is managed on precisely the same principle. The engines are not connected directly to the service pipes, or the water would issue in sudden jets ; but the pumps work into a large reservoir, from which the supply is drawn off. No appreciable change is caused in the level of the reservoir (and therefore in the steady pressure of the service) either by the XV] WORK AND ENERGY 151 intermittent strokes of the pumps, or by the casual turning on or off of taps in other parts of the city. 147. In all the cases so far considered there has been no gain or loss of energy on the whole, but only a transfer Reversible and irreversible from system to system, or from one form to an- other. What has been gained or lost in one shape has been lost or gained in another. The work done in winding up the clock- weight can be recovered by letting it run down ; the bent bow restores in unbending the work required to bend it ; the pendulum rises to an equal height on the other side of the vertical. Mechanical processes of this kind, which can be run backwards with recovery of the whole of the original work, are called reversible. In practice they are generally accompanied by others which are irreversible. The Simple Machines and their combinations do not give the results demanded by the formulae we have ob- tained. Their movements are interfered with by frictions and resistances, wherever their moving parts come into contact with each other or with the surrounding air. Even the pendulum is affected by resistances at the pivot and against the air. These forces, being only called forth by motion, by their very nature always act so as to oppose it. When therefore the machine is run backwards, their direction is reversed, and instead of the work expended against them being restored, more is used up. It is the business of Physics to trace what becomes of the energy which thus passes away from the ken of Mechanics. Here it may only be said that when account is taken of all the other effects accompanying mechanical processes, the heat, the sounds, the luminous, electric, magnetic, and chemical changes, it is found that the total energy of a system, isolated and left entirely to itself, though it may take on many forms, is unalterable in amount. This is the doctrine of the Conservation of Energy, the central landmark of the science of the nineteenth century. The principle began to be clearly apprehended from 1840 onwards, first in the case of Heat through the work of Joule and Mayer ; and was first formally extended to all branches of Physics in 1847 by Helmholtz in his paper on u Die Erhaltung der Kraft." Maxwell gives it the following general statement : 152 MECHANICS [CHAP. " The total energy of any body or system of bodies is a quantity which can neither be increased nor diminished by any mutual action of these bodies, though it may be transformed into any of the forms of which energy is susceptible." 148. The Mechanical Powers and their combinations are incapable of producing a supply of work. They En"rgy S f The can on ty transfer or transform an existing supply, so as to apply the force in some specially con- venient way. They may increase the force, but in this case the distance through which it moves the body is decreased in the same proportion, or decrease the force, but in this case the distance is increased in the same proportion. " What is gained in power is lost in speed." Machinery cannot produce work for us; it has to be worked. The energy needed for driving a machine must be obtained from such sources as living animals, the kinetic energy of winds, the potential energy of water-falls, the chemical energy stored in coal or other fuel. From these must be supplied not only the useful work delivered by the machine, but the waste and loss due to irreversible processes in working it. 149. The Power of any of these agents is measured by the rate at which it can supply work. Many years ago James Watt made experiments on the power of some of the heavy dray-horses belonging to Barclay and Perkins' Brewery, London. The horses were set to raise a weight of 100 Ibs. from the bottom of a deep well by pulling horizontally on a rope passing over a pulley. Watt found that a horse could walk about 2J miles an hour at this work, thus doing 2'5 x 5280 x -Vo- = 22,000 foot-pounds per minute. Allowing 50 / extra for the work wasted in frictions, he arrived at the estimate of 33,000 foot-pounds per minute for the average power of a horse. This unit has been adopted by engineers, and is known as a Horse-Power. 150. When several forces act on a moving body, each does The case of work, or has work done against it. If the work Equilibrium. done by some of them is equal to the work done against the others, the kinetic energy of the body is unchanged. XV] WORK AND ENERGY 153 But uniform motion can only take place when on the whole no forces are acting. The forces in this case must therefore balance, or be in equilibrium. This is, in fact, the Principle of Virtual Work, already treated in Chapter VII. Thus when the equal weights of an At wood's Machine ( 131) are running uniformly, the upward tension of the string on either weight is exactly equal and opposite to the downward pull of gravity. The forces are in equilibrium, just as they would be in the special case when the velocity of the system was zero, i.e. when it was at rest relatively to the earth. We shall now consider the equilibrium of forces from the Newtonian point of view in more detail. EXAMPLES. (Caution, In using the dynamical formulae MV=Pt; MV^/2 = Ps, the force must always be expressed in the proper dynamical units, i.e. poundals or dynes, according to the system employed ; conversely, forces determined from these formulae must be converted to pound- or gramme-weights by dividing by 32 '2 or 981 respectively.) 1. Calculate in foot-pounds the energy of : (a) a projectile weighing 1034 Ibs., and having a velocity of 2262 ft. per second ; (6) a train of 300 tons moving at 60 miles an hour. 2 The projectile in Question 1 penetrates a sandbank to a depth of 30 ft. ! the train is brought to rest by the brakes in one minute. Compare the resistance offered by the sandbank with the retarding force of the brakes. 3. The unit of Power commonly employed in electrical engineering is that of the c.G.s. system, the Watt, which is a power capable of doing 10 7 ergs of work per second. If 1 lb. = 454 gms., 1 metre = 39 '37 inches, and # = 981, shew that one horse-power =746 watts. 4. A man weighing 12 stone climbs a mountain at the rate of 1000 feet (vertically) an hour. What horse-power is he developing? 5. What must be the horse-power of an engine to pump 1100 cubic feet of water per hour from a well 120 feet deep, a cubic foot of water weighing 1000 ounces? 6. A train weighs 120 tons including the engine. The resistances to motion on a level are equivalent to a retarding force of 16 Ibs. weight per 154 MECHANICS [CHAP. XV ton. Find the greatest speed at which the train can run if the engine is of 150 H.P. (" Full speed " is the speed at which the engine is just able to exert a force equal to the resistances to motion. The train then moves uniformly under the First Law of Motion.) 7. If the train in Question 6 is moving at 20 miles an hour, and the engine is working at full power, find the acceleration. 8. Find the H.P. of an engine which can take a train of 100 tons up an incline of 1 in 200 at 20 miles an hour, the resistances being equivalent to 14 Ibs. per ton. (Here the engine has to do the work required to lift the train vertically through a certain height per minute, as well as to overcome the resistances.) 9. The resistances to motion of a train being 14 Ibs. per ton (English) weight, if the train going 40 miles per hour come to the foot of an incline of 1 in 168, the steam being turned off, find how far it will run up the incline. If it had come to the top of the incline, how far would it have descended before stopping ? 10. A bullet weighing half an ounce is fired with a speed of 2000 feet per second from a rifle weighing 10 Ibs. If the rifle kicks back through 3 inches, find the average pressure applied by the shoulder in bringing it to rest. 11. A hammer-head weighing 1 Ib. strikes a nail with a velocity of 10 feet per second, and drives it in 1 inch. What was the average pressure of the hammer on the nail ? 12. The ram of a pile-driver weighs 200 Ibs. and falls 12 feet on the head of a pile which yields half an inch. What steady weight could the pile sustain ? 13. A clock-weight of 4 kilogrammes is wound up through a height of 1 metre and then drives the clock for eight days. Express in Watts the power needed to drive the clock. 14. In a steam engine the average pressure of steam during the stroke is 180 Ibs. on the square inch. The length of stroke is 3 ft. 4 in., and the diameter of the piston is 5^ inches. If the engine makes 125 revolutions per minute, find its horse-power. 15. An ocean steamer with engines of 30,000 H.P. can make 25 miles an hour. What is the resistance to her motion through the water ? 16. The average flow over Niagara Falls is 270,000 cubic feet per second. The height of fall is 161 feet. What horse-power could be developed from the Falls if all the energy were utilized ? 17. A belt is transmitting 12 H.P. to a pulley 2 feet in diameter, running at 375 revolutions per minute. What is the driving force of the belt ? CHAPTER XVI. THE PARALLELOGRAM LAW. 151. ACCOEDING to the Second Law of Motion, when two or more forces act at a point of a body, each produces its effect independently of the others, and this effect is not only pro- portional to the magnitude, but takes place in the direction of the force. Forces may therefore conveniently be represented by straight lines. For a force is completely specified when Representation of * * A Forces by straight we know (1) the point at which it acts, (2) its direction, and (3) its magnitude ; and a straight line can be drawn (1) from any point, (2) in any direction, and (3) of such a length as to represent any magnitude on any convenient scale. Quantities which, like forces, depend for their effect on their direction as well as on their magnitude, are distinguished as vector quantities, while quantities which have only magnitude, such as a sum of money, or the amount of corn in a heap, are called scalar quantities. Scalar quantities are added by ordinary arithmetic. But a special rule is required for adding, or rather compounding, vector quantities. This rule is the Parallelogram Law, already stated for forces in 38. We proceed to prove it in turn for Displacements, Velocities, Accelerations, and Forces. 156 MECHANICS [CHAP. I. Displacements. 152. Let a point receive two separate displacements represented by OA, OB respectively. The order in which the displacements are given is immaterial. We may suppose the point first carried to A, and then displaced through AC, equal and parallel to OB ; or first carried to B, Fig. 62. and then displaced through BC, equal and parallel to OA. The joint result is the same. The point arrives at C, which it might have reached by a single displacement represented by OC. A single displacement can thus be found which is equivalent to (i.e. has the same effect as) any two displacements; it is represented by that diagonal of the parallelogram constructed on the lines representing the displacements which passes through the point. II. Velocities. 153. If the two displacements OA, OB, take place uniformly and simultaneously in the course of one second, OA, OB will represent velocities, and OC the single velocity which is equivalent to them. The rule is thus true for velocities. If any difficulty is found in conceiving that a point may have two velocities at once, think of a fly crawling along the paper along OA in one second, while the paper itself is moved obliquely along OB. The velocity of the fly with regard to the table is OC, which may be regarded as made up of his velocity with regard to the paper, OA, together with that of the paper with regard to the table, OB. If the motions take place uniformly, by the time the fly reaches any point A', the paper will . have moved a proportional distance B, AC' = OB' such that AfC' _AC_ OA' ~ OA ' so that C' is on OC, and, in one second, he actually moves along 0(7, relatively to the table. XVI] THE PARALLELOGRAM LAW 157 154. (1) A steamer steering due East at 10 knots an hour ,. . is carried by a current due North at 3 knots an Applications. hour. Find the real speed and course. The speed (Fig. 64) is OG = VlO 2 + 3 2 = V109 = 10-44, 0=16 42' north of East. >-iE w E Fig. 65. (2) A vessel makes 6 knots an hour due West. Another is making 8 knots due South. What is the speed and course of the second with regard to the first ? Cases of relative motion, such as this, are best solved by the following artifice. No difference will be produced in the relative motion, if each of the moving objects is given an extra velocity, provided it is the same for each. Let J., B (Fig. 65) be the vessels. Apply to each the velocity 6 knots due East, which is equal and opposite to the actual velocity of A. The effect will be that A is reduced to rest, having equal and opposite velocities; while B moves with the two speeds 8 knots South and 6 knots East jointly. But these are equivalent to a speed V6 2 + 8 2 = 10 knots, at an angle tan" 1 3/4 east of South. This is the speed and course relative to A supposed at rest. If the position of B with regard to A is given, it is easy to calculate whether there will be a collision, or what will be the shortest distance between the ships. 158 MECHANICS [CHAP, xvi 155. If the velocities OA, OB are communicated to a point during one second, it has accelerations OA, OB: III. Accelerations. . . . . ' but it is obvious that the effect is the same as if the equivalent velocity OC were imparted every second. That is, an acceleration OC is equivalent to the two accelerations OA, OB. 156. Let two forces represented by OA, OB act on the same mass. By the IV. Forces. *, Second Law ot Motion they will produce, independently, ac- celerations in the directions OA, OB and proportional to them. OA, OB may therefore be taken to represent the accelerations. But a single acceleration OC is equivalent to OA, OB jointly; and by the second law this might have been produced by a single force acting in the direction OC, and represented by OC on the same scale as that on which the original forces are represented by OA, OB. Hence the force OC is equivalent to the two forces OA, OB } and the rule is true for forces. EXAMPLES. 1. A train is travelling due North at 20 miles an hour through a shower of rain falling almost vertically, but with a slight in cli nation eastwards, enough to make the drops graze the windows. If the raindrops have a speed of 16 feet per second, find the inclination to the vertical of the splashes on the windows. 2. A shot with a velocity of 2000 feet per second is fired at a steamer in a direction at right angles to the steamer's course, and pierces both sides. If the deck is 40 feet broad, and the steamer is making 25 miles an hour, find how many inches the second hole will be astern of the first. 3. The speed of the earth in her orbit is 19 miles per second. Con- sequently the light from a star appears to be slightly altered in direction to an observer on the earth, and the star is apparently displaced in the direction of the earth's motion. This "aberration" from the true position (discovered by Bradley in 1729) is 20 '45" for a star situated in a direction perpendicular to the earth's line of motion Hence find the velocity of light. CHAPTEE XVII. THE COMPOSITION AND EESOLUTION OF FORCES. RESULTANT. COMPONENT. EQUILIBRIUM. 157. BY means of the Parallelogram of Forces two or more forces acting at a point may be compounded into a single force, called their Resultant, which shall produce the same effect. And this effect can in general be more easily calculated for the single resultant than for the several forces to which it is equivalent. In particular, when there is to be no change at all in the state of rest or motion, i.e. when there is to be equilibrium, the resultant must, by the Second Law of Motion, be zero. Any mathematical expression of this fact is a statement of the conditions of equi- librium for the given forces. Conversely, a single force may be resolved into two or more Components, which shall together have the same effect. This is often convenient especially when we wish to limit our attention to the motion or conditions of equilibrium in a particular direction ; for each force can be resolved into a component along that direction, and another perpendicular to it ; and the latter may be disregarded, as it can produce no effect at right angles to its own line of action. The magnitudes and directions of the straight lines repre- senting the Resultants and Components are to be found by geometrical construction or trigonometrical computation. 160 MECHANICS [CHAP. Forces acting in the same plane at the same point. 158. I. To find the Resultant of Two Forces. (a) Geometrical Methods. (1) Construct the parallelogram and draw the diagonal. (2) The whole parallelogram need not be drawn. Take OA to represent the first force, and B c from A draw AC representing the second in magnitude and direction (but not in point of application). Join 0(7. This is the Resultant. It is better, especially when there are several forces, to make two figures : Fig. 67. a force diagram, where the lines represent the forces completely, and a construction diagram of the triangles giving the magnitudes and directions. Thus : Fig. 68. (3) Since the diagonals bisect each other, OC20D, where D is the middle point of AB. This value of the resultant is occasionally convenient. (b) Trigonometrical Method. Let the two forces be P and Q, inclined at an angle a ; let R be their resultant, making an angle with P. Then 0<7 2 = OA* + AC* - WA . AC cos OAC, /. R* = P>+Q>- 2PQ cos (180 - a) = P 2 + Q 2 + 2PQ cos a. . , sin 6 sin A And - = - XVll] THE COMPOSITION AND RESOLUTION OF FORCES 161 /. sin = sin (180 -a) . (Caution. If other forces have to be combined with the resultant of these two, the whole work has to be done over again for each force, and the expressions become very cumbrous. The method must never be employed for three or more forces, though it is Q occasionally convenient when there are only two. For more than two the method of 164 must be used.) The special case when the forces are at right angles is important. i Here 2 = P 2 +Q 2 , and tan 6 = -^ . Fig. 69. 159. II. To resolve a Force into two Components. This can be done in an infinite number of ways. For draw any triangle on the line representing the force (Fig. 70). The sides give the magnitudes and directions of two components equi- valent to the force. Thus : Fig. 70. Fig. 71. Observe that the sides of the triangle must be taken in order, i.e. we must continue along them in the same direction round the triangle. The resultant of OP and RP, applied at 0, is not OR but OR (Fig. 71). 11 c. 162 MECHANICS [CHAP. 160. (1) To resolve a force into two components of given magnitudes. This is to construct a triangle when the three sides are given (Euc. I. 22). Evidently the two components must together be greater than the force, or there is no solution. 161. (2) To resolve a force into two components in given directions. Let OR represent the force ; and let Ox, Oy be the directions. Draw parallels to the directions through R. OP, OQ are the components (Fig. 72). p Fig. 72. Fig. 73. 162. Let the force OR and the direction Ox be fixed, while Oy varies. Then for every different direction given to Oy the component OP along Ox has a different value. The special case when OQ is at right angles to OP is so important that the value of the component OP in that case is called The Resolved Part of OR in the direction Ox, the corresponding value of OQ being The Resolved Part of OR in the perpendicular direction. Let X, Y be the resolved parts of the force R, represented by OR (Fig. 73), along Ox, Oy, and let R make the angle with Ox. Then X = OP = OR cos = R cos 0, and Y = OQ = OR sin 6 = R sin (9. To find the resolved part of a force in any direction multiply it by the cosine of the angle between the force and that direction. Since sin 6 = cos (90 - 6) = cos QOR, the rule just stated applies to the component Y as well as to the component X. If the component in any direction is found by multiplying by the XVIl] THE COMPOSITION AND RESOLUTION OF FORCES 163 cosine or sine of any angle, then the component in the per- pendicular direction is found by multiplying by the sine or cosine of the same angle. The reason for the importance of this case is easily seen. Suppose (Fig. 73) to be a curtain ring sliding on a smooth rod Ox, and pulled obliquely by a cord with a force R along OR. The ring can only slide along the rod. In finding whether it will remain at rest or begin to move we are not helped by resolving R into components P and Q as in Fig. 72, for then besides the component P along the rod, the oblique force Q will still have to be reckoned with. But if R be replaced by a component along the rod and another at right angles to it, the latter may be left out of account, since it can produce no effect in the direction of the rod. It is a great simplification to have thus got rid of all oblique forces. 163. III. Three or more forces, (a) Geometrical Method. Let the forces P ]} P 2 , P 3 , ... act at as in Fig. 74. Make a construction diagram. From any point 0' draw O'A to represent P x ; from A draw AB to represent P 2 ; and so on. Let DE represent the last force. Then O'B represents the resultant of P 1 and P 2 ; O'C the resultant of O'B and P,, i.e. of P lt P 2 and P s ; and finally O'E the resultant of all the forces. Draw OR equal and parallel to O'E. This is the resultant. 112 164 MECHANICS 164. (b) Trigonometrical Method. [CHAP. Fig. 75. Let the forces P lt P z , ... act at 0. Choose any direction xOx', and yOy' at right angles to it. Let the forces make angles a lt 2 , ... with Ox. Kesolve each of the forces P ly P 2 , ... into its components along Ox, Oy. The components of P l are P l cos a^ along Ox and Pj sin a a along Oy, P 2 P 2 coso2 Ox P 2 sina 2 Oy, and so on for all the forces. The oblique forces are thus got rid of, and we have only a set of forces P T cosa 1} P 2 cos 2 , &c. acting in the same direction along Ox\ and another set P 1 sina ll P 2 sina 2 , &c. along Oy. Let the sum of the forces along Ox be X ; that of the forces along Oy IOQ T\ so that X = Pi COS j + P 2 COS 2 + . . ., F= P! sin ! + P 2 sin 2 4- XVII] THE COMPOSITION AND RESOLUTION OF FORCES 165 Then the original set of forces is reduced to two forces X and Y acting at right angles. Y/ X-' IO Fig. 76. The resultant of these is R, where and it makes an angle with Ox, such that .(1), .(2). The advantage of this method is that however many forces there may be, X and Y can be written down at once, as the values of the cosines and sines are found from the tables. Then 21 and B are easily found from (1) and (2). 165. I. Two Forces. Two forces acting at a point can only balance, i.e. fail to have The conditions of a resultant, when they are equal in magnitude and Equilibrium. directly opposed to each other. 166 MECHANICS [CHAP. (a) Graphically. For it is only when the above conditions are fulfilled that the diagonal of the parallelogram vanishes. (b) Analytically. The Trigonometrical formula for the resultant leads to the same result, as follows : This can only vanish if P Q = 0, and cos ^ = 0, i.e. if P = and a = 180. 166. II. Three Forces (a) Graphically. Fig. 77. Make the force diagram O'AB for P lt P 2 ; their resultant is O'B. In order that this may balance P 3 , P 3 must be represented in magnitude and direction by BO' (taken in the sense of the arrow). Or, make the force diagram O'ABG for all three forces. Then unless C falls upon 0', they will have a resultant O'C. Hence : In order that three forces acting at a point may be in equilibrium they must be represented in magnitude and direction by the three sides of a triangle taken in order. Conversely : If three forces represented in magnitude and XVIl] THE COMPOSITION AND RESOLUTION OF FORCES 167 direction by the three sides of a triangle taken in order be applied at a point, they will be in equilibrium. This proposition is known as the Triangle of Forces. 167. (b) Analytically. Father Lami in his Mdcanique (published in 1687, the year of Newton's Principia) gave the Triangle of Forces a Trigonometrical form. Produce O'A, AB, BO' (Fig. 77). Then Z P^OP* = Z aAB = 180 - A. Similarly, Z P 2 OP 3 = Z bBO' = 180 - B, Z P 3 OP 1 = Z o'O'A = 180 - 0'. For equilibrium A A-A 0'A~AB BO" A Pi P* P* sin B sin 0' sin A ' P! P 2 PS * sinP 2 OP 3 sinPsOP^sinP^P,,* Hence Lami's Theorem : If three forces acting at a point are in equilibrium, each is proportional to the sine of the angle between the other two. 168. III. Any number of Forces. (a) Graphically. Make a construction diagram. Then there will be a resultant unless the last point returns to the first, and the diagram forms a closed polygon. Hence : If any number of forces acting at a point are represented in magnitude and direction by the sides of a closed polygon taken in order, they will be in equilibrium. This is known as the Polygon of Forces. 169. (b) Analytically. By the method of 164 the resultant R is given by 168 MECHANICS [CHAP. where X = P l cosa 1 + , F=P 1 sina 1 + For equilibrium R = 0, .-. Z 2 +F 2 = 0. But since the squares are necessarily positive, this can only be the case when X and Y are separately zero. /. X = 0) and F=OJ"' i.e. The sums of the resolved parts of the forces in any two directions at right angles must be separately zero. We are at liberty to choose any two directions at our convenience, for in finding the resultant ( 164) the directions Ox, Oy were taken arbitrarily. Both X and Y must be zero. If JT = 0, there can be no resultant tending to cause motion along Ox. But there may still be an unbalanced force along Oy, and yet no effect produced along Ox, at right angles to it. It is necessary therefore to have F=0 as well. The two conditions secure that there shall be no disturbance in either of two mutually perpendicular directions. There cannot then be an unbalanced force in any other direction, since had such an oblique force existed, it must have had components along both Ox and Oy Note that (6) can be at once deduced from (a) by projecting the construction diagram on to any straight line in the plane. For the sum of the projections of the sides of a closed polygon on any straight line is zero. Conversely, if we project on each of two straight lines, and find the sum of the projections in each case zero, the polygon must be closed. XVII] THE COMPOSITION AND RESOLUTION OF FORCES 169 EXAMPLES. 1. Shew, by a drawing, that if the angle at which two forces are inclined to each other be increased their resultant is diminished. 2. Hence shew that if a picture is hung from a nail by a string fastened to two rings in the top of the frame, the shorter the string the stronger it ought to be. Could the string be stretched so tightly between the rings as to remain straight when placed over the nail ? 3. Two forces acting at right angles to each other have a resultant which is double the smaller force. Find its direction. 4. A BCD is a parallelogram, and AB is bisected in E\ prove that the resultant of the forces AD, AC is double the resultant of EA, AC. 5. A BCD is a quadrilateral, and JE'the point of intersection of the lines joining the middle points of opposite sides ; is any point. Prove that the resultant of forces OA, OB, OC, OD is equal to 40E. 6. Two forces act at a point. Shew that if, when one of the forces is reversed, the resultant is at right angles to the direction of the resultant before the change, the forces are equal. 7. A BCD is a quadrilateral. Shew that if four forces represented by AB, AD, CB, CD be applied at a point, their resultant will be represented by four times the line joining the middle points of the diagonals. 8. Find the magnitude and direction of the resultants of the following pairs of forces (in pound weights) : (1) 24 Ibs. and 7 Ibs. acting at right angles, (2) 7 Ibs. and 8 Ibs. at an angle of 60, (3) 11 Ibs. and 14 Ibs. at 120, (4) 6 Ibs. and 8 Ibs. at 52. 9. Forces 7, 12, 3, 11 act at a point, the first due East ; the second North-East, the third North ; and the fourth 60 west of North. Find their resultant. 10. Forces 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 act at a point, the angle between each force and the next being 47. Find the magnitude of the resultant, correct to two places of decimals, and its direction. 11. Find the resolved part of a force of 60 Ibs. in a direction inclined 40 to the force. 170 MECHANICS [CHAP. 12. A canal-boat is pulled by a rope 60 feet long, and the boat is 30 feet from the towing path. If the horse pulls with a force of 120 Ibs. weight, what is the force urging the boat forward ? 13. A captive balloon capable of raising a weight of 400 Ibs. is anchored at a height of 400 feet by a rope 500 feet long. Find the strain on the rope and the horizontal pressure of the wind on the balloon. 14. A 50 Ib. weight hangs by a wire 13 feet long. What horizontal force is required to draw it aside 5 feet from the vertical through the point of suspension, and what will then be the tension of the wire 1 15. A body of weight 15 Ibs. is placed on an inclined plane 3 feet high and 5 feet long. Find the components of its weight along and perpendicular to the plane. 16. Explain how a boat can sail almost in the eye of the wind, by setting the sail between the direction of the wind and the boat's course. (The velocity of the wind may be resolved into a component parallel to the sail, which has no effect, and a component perpendicular to the sail, which exerts a pressure on it. This pressure may again be resolved into components parallel and perpendicular to the boat's length. The former is the propelling force ; the latter causes leeway, which is made as small as possible by using a keel or centreboard to resist sideway motion. Draw a diagram shewing the two resolutions, and shew that if P be the pressure which the wind would exert on the sail if at right angles to it, a, the inclinations of wind and sail to the keel of the boat, then headway force = P sin (/3 - a) sin /3, leeway force = P sin (/3 - a) cos /3.) 17. Explain how a kite is sustained in air, and shew by a drawing that the perpendiculai to the kite must lie between the direction of the string and the vertical. 18. Forces 24, 7, and 25 Ibs. weight balance at a point. Shew that two of them are at right angles. 19. A 50 Ib. weight is hung from two points by strings inclined 30 and 45 to the vertical. Find the tensions of the strings. 20. A picture weighing 8 Ibs. is hung by a string passing over a nail and attached to two rings in the top of the frame. Find the tension of the string when the two portions are inclined at an angle of (1) 60, (2) 120. XVIT] THE COMPOSITION AND RESOLUTION OF FORCES 171 21. Find the ratio of the " power " to the " weight " in the inclined plane by resolving along and at right angles to the plane. Find also the pressure on the plane. (This is the best way of treating the inclined plane, and serves equally well when the force is not parallel to the plane.) 22. A weight W rests on an inclined plane, inclination a. Find the force required to sustain it, and the pressure on the plane, (1) when the force acts horizontally ; (2) when its direction makes an angle e with the plane and above it. 23. Shew that if the strings supporting a single moveable pulley are inclined at to the vertical, P= W/2 cos 6. 24. Weights P and Q rest on the upper edge of a smooth vertical circle, and are connected by a string, running round the edge, whose length is a quadrant of the circle. Find the position of equilibrium, and the tension of the string. (Write down the conditions of equilibrium first for P and then for $, by resolving along the tangent and at right angles to it in each case, assuming that the radius to P makes an angle 6 with the horizontal. The resulting equations determine 6 and T.) 25. Two men raise a cask weighing 300 Ibs. from a cellar to the street by drawing it up planks inclined 30 to the horizon by means of two ropes fastened to the wheels of a dray in the street, passed down the planks, under and round the barrel, and pulled parallel to the planks. What is the least force each man must exert? 26. A conical pendulum consists of a ball weighing 5 Ibs. suspended by a string 4 feet long. If the ball is projected so as to describe a horizontal circle twice in three seconds, what will be the inclination of the string to the vertical, and what will be its tension ? In what time must the ball revolve in order that the string may be inclined 30 to the vertical? (The acceleration of the ball to the centre may be calculated by 77. The resultant force on the ball, in poundals, in order that it may go on describing the circle is the product of this acceleration into the mass of the ball. We may then either : (1) express the condition that this force is the horizontal component of the tension of the string, while its vertical component is equal to the weight ; or (2) observing that if this force were reversed in direction, it would be in equilibrium with the tension and the weight, treat the problem as if the ball were at rest under the weight, the tension, and the reversed resultant force.) 172 MECHANICS [CHAP, xvn 27. A conical pendulum with a string of length I makes n revolutions per second. Shew that the inclination of the string is a, where cosa = ^ . 28. Prove that in the conical pendulum the time of revolution is 2?r ./-, where h is the vertical depth of the revolving ball below the point of support. 29. Apply this result to the governor of a steam engine, and shew that for an engine making 60 revolutions per minute the depth of the balls below the point of support must be about 978 inches. 30. Why is the outside rail of a railway track raised above the inside rail at a curve ? Shew that if a train runs round a curve of radius r feet with velocity #, the floor of the carriage should be inclined at an angle whose tangent is v 2 /gr in order that there may be no lateral thrust on the rails. 31. Shew that on a 5-foot track, round a curve of one-eighth of a mile radius, for a mean velocity of 30 miles an hour, the outside rail ought to be raised between 5 and 6 inches above the level of the inner rail. CHAPTER XVIII. FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE. 170. I. RESULTANT of Two Forces acting at different points. Fig. 78. Let the forces P and Q act on a body at A and B. To fix the ideas, suppose that the body is a flat board lying on a horizontal table, and that the forces are applied by cords, attached to pins at A and B, and carrying weights at their free ends, which hang over the edge of the table. Let the directions of P and Q, produced if necessary, meet in 0. The effect of P and Q will not be altered if they are applied at in the same directions, instead of at A and B. This principle, that the effect of a force is the same, at whatever point in its line of action it is applied, is known as the principle of the Transmissibility of Force. It may be regarded as an axiom directly based on experience. In fact we feel that if the cords by which P and Q are applied are prolonged to and 174 MECHANICS [CHAP. fastened to a pin there, the pins at A and B may be taken out without disturbance. (Or the principle may be deduced from some other axiom of experience, such as the Third Law of Motion. All actual bodies undergo slight changes of shape on the application of force. The idea of a perfectly rigid body is a mathematical fiction, useful because most of the solids known to us approxi- mate so closely to it that in Statics, where we are concerned with the external relations between different bodies, we can greatly simplify our theorems if we are content to ignore the very small internal displacements and the corre- sponding (often great) internal forces that are called into play. When these are taken account of, we enter on the Theory of Elasticity. Consider, as the simplest case, a fine rubber thread kept stretched by two forces applied at the ends. Every particle of the thread is drawn apart from those on each side of it till the forces of cohesion so developed are sufficient to prevent further stretching. By the Third Law the forces between each pair of particles are then equal and opposite. The stretching force applied to one of the end particles must, for equilibrium, exactly balance the internal pull of the. second particle upon the first ; and so on throughout the string, till the internal pull upon the last particle balances the external force applied to the other end. The pull is thus transmitted by the stretched thread so as to balance the exactly equal pull at the other end. In the case of the elastic thread the displacements would be so large that they must be taken account of ; but the internal forces, though everywhere equal to the external pulls, may be ignored, since they occur in equal and opposite pairs. The same process goes on in the solids contemplated in Statics as rigid bodies. But the displacements are so small as not to affect the configuration, and so may be left out of account. The internal forces may be ignored for the same reason as before ; and this is true even when the line of action of the transmitted force passes outside the body. " For let two equal forces act at A and (Fig. 79) in opposite directions. Then the internal reactions between the parts of the body, which hold it together, arc, by the Third Law, at every point, whether in the line AO or elsewhere, equal and opposite. Therefore the whole set, including the two equal forces at A and 0, will balance, just as they would if both the forces were applied at the point 0. Hence the effect of a force at A is the same as if it were applied at 0, another point in its line of action.) The resultant of P and Q acting at passes through 0. Let it cut the line joining AB in C, and take OC, which already represents it in direction and point of application, to represent it also in magnitude. Draw CD, CE parallels to OB, OA ; then OD, OE will XYIIl] FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE 175 represent the components P and Q on the scale of the resultant oc. Fig. 79. Drop CF, CG perpendiculars to OA, OB. Then, area of the parallelogram CDOE = ODxCF=OEx CG. .-. PxCF=QxCG. Thus the resultant cuts AB in a point C such that the moments of P and Q about C are equal and opposite. 171. Since we might have taken any length OC to represent the resultant, this property must hold for all points on the resultant ; or, what comes to the same thing : The algebraical sum of the moments of two concurrent forces about any point on the line of action of their resultant is zero. 172. The property just proved is a particular case of a theorem communicated to the Paris Academy by Vangnon s _ J J Theorem of Varignon in 1687 (the year of the Principia and Moments. of Lami s theorem). The moment of the Resultant of two co-planar Forces about any point in their plane is equal to the (algebraical) sum of the moments of the Forces. Consider two forces AB, AC and their resultant AD. The moment of the force AB about the point is the product of AB by the perpendicular from on AB, i.e. twice the area of the triangle OAB. Similarly the moments of AC, AD will be twice the triangles OAC, OAD. We have to shew that OAD = OAB + OAC 176 MECHANICS [CHAP. when is outside the angle between the forces (Fig. 80 a), and OAD = OAB -OAG when is inside (Fig. 80 b). Fig. 80. The perpendiculars from the vertices B, C, D of the three triangles OAB, OAG, OAD upon their common base OA are equal to the projections of AB, AC, AD on a line at right angles toOA. But the projection of AD on any line is equal to the algebraic sum of the projections of AB and BD ; or of AB and AC which is equal and parallel to BD. .'. the area OAD is equal to the algebraic sum of the areas OAB, OAG. The 4- sign is obviously to be taken in Fig. 80 (a), and the - in Fig. 80 (b). If is on the line of the resultant, the moment of the resultant and therefore the sum of the moments of the forces, is zero. Note. The Moment of a force about a point may be conveniently represented by the area (or double the area) of the triangle formed by joining the point to the ends of the line representing the force. 173. If the forces P and Q ( 170) are parallel, their directions will not meet, and our construction fails. Parallel Forces. XVIII] FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE 177 This is a case for employing the principle of Continuity, us start with the figure of 170, and Q gradually bring the forces to parallelism, $ making them both approach the direction /| perpendicular to AB. The parallelogram jj\ CEOD becomes more and more lozenge- ; i\ shaped (Fig. 81), and the diagonal is more and more nearly equal to the sum of the sides. The law of moments, PxCF=QxCG, remains true, but GF and CG approach the values CA, GB. We can see what will happen in the limit, when the forces become really parallel. (1) The Resultant becomes the sum of the forces, so that (2) It is parallel to the forces. (3) It cuts AB in C, so that PxAG=QxBG. It is thus completely determined. When the forces are parallel, the segments Let p Q Fig. 81. of any oblique line A'CB' through G may be used instead of ACS, since A'C AC _Q B'G BC~P' .-. PxAC=QxB'G. 174. One of the most familiar cases The Principle of is when the tw forces OCt the Lever. on ft ^ ar Qr other bo dy which is only free to turn on a pivot. To find the relation between the forces and their distances so that they should have c. A' Fig. 82. 12 178 MECHANICS [CHAP. equal power to turn the bar about the pivot was Archimedes' famous problem of the Lever. ( 3.) The difficulty of judging between unequal forces at unequal distances vanishes when only one force is applied to the bar, for it will certainly turn it one way or the other unless the force goes through the pivot. But we can now replace the two forces by their single resul- tant. Then if G is the pivot the resultant must, in the case of equilibrium, go through C, and therefore, whether the forces intersect or are parallel, if they are to have equal torques, i.e. tendencies to turn the bar about the pivot, the product of each into the perpendicular distance from the pivot must be the same. This product must therefore be the proper measure of the torque of a force about a point. As we have seen, Leonardo called it the Moment of the force about the point. The principle of the Lever thus follows from the Parallelogram of Forces. We might go on to deduce from it all that has been given in 6 33 about the Centre of Gravity, the Balance, Wheel and Axle, and the Pulleys. Parallel Forces in Opposite Directions. 175. The student may deduce from Fig. 83 what will happen when the forces act in opposite directions. Let Q be the larger ; then (1) R = Q-P. (2) R is parallel to P and Q and cuts AB outside, beyond the larger force. (3) Since C is on the re- sultant, by Varignon's Theorem, the moments of the forces about C are equal and opposite. If they are perpendicular to A B, PxAC=QxBC, and this is extended as before to an oblique line A'CB'. 83 - XVIII] FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE 179 (Or the case of unlike forces may be deduced from that of like forces as in 13.) 176. An important case of failure of the method for finding the resultant of two forces remains to be considered. If the forces are unlike in direction and equal, the resultant Q P vanishes. Moreover no point C can be found, outside AB, which will make P x A G = P x BC. When Q is very nearly equal to P, C has to be a long way off. For equality G would have to be at an infinite distance. In fact a pair of equal parallel forces acting in opposite directions has no single resultant, and cannot be balanced by any single force. They have no tendency to move a body from one place to another, which could be met by a single force ; but they tend to turn it round in its place ; to give it a twist. Such are the forces applied by the thumb and finger to the wings of a screw nut; or by the hands to the bar of a copying-press; or to a capstan by two men working on opposite sides of it. A pair of equal, unlike, parallel forces is called a Couple. The perpendicular distance between the forces is called the Arm of the Couple. A Couple has no single resultant, and no single force can balance it. But it has a twisting tendency, or Torque, measured by its moment. 177. The theory of Couples was introduced by Poinsot, and The Properties affords a beautiful method of simplifying compli- O f couples. cated systems of forces. (In thinking about couples it should be borne in mind that they are here supposed to be applied to a rigid body kept at rest by certain forces, and that the couples considered form part of the system of forces maintaining the equilibrium. It is shewn in works on Rigid Dynamics that the effect of a couple applied to a rigid body otherwise free to move is to set it rotating about an axis passing through its centre of gravity, but not necessarily perpendicular to the plane of the couple.) Let the forces in Fig. 84 be not quite equal; suppose the force at A to be the weight of one pound (= 7000 grains), and 122 180 MECHANICS [CHAP. that at B to be one pound and one grain. Let AB be one foot. Then their resultant will be a force of one grain, directed upwards and applied at a point 0, 7000 feet away to the right of B. If these forces are applied to a rod pivoted at 0, there is equilibrium. But if the pivot be anywhere else, there will be a tendency to turn measured by the moment of the resultant about the pivot. For instance, if we take for unit of moment the moment of a force of one pound about a point distant one foot from its line of action, and if the pivot is 20 feet to the right of B, the moment will be 6980 x ^ m = ff units. The moment about a pivot 10 feet to the right of B is $fjfj; about B it is fggg = 1 ; about A, ftlgj. It is clear that for pivots anywhere in the neighbourhood of the forces the moments are all very nearly equal equal, indeed, to the product of the force at B (one pound) by the distance AB (one foot). To make a difference pf so much as one per cent., the pivot must be at least 70 feet away from B. In spite of the smallness of the resultant its moment remains considerable owing to the distance at which it acts. But then a considerable change in that distance is required to produce any marked alteration in the value of the moment. Proceeding to the limit when the forces are exactly equal (say one pound each), we see that (1) the resultant utterly vanishes ; (2) the moment remains finite (equal to one unit); (3) the moment is the same wherever the pivot is placed in the plane of the couple. This might have been deduced directly from a consideration of the forces. Fig. 84. XVIII] FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE 181 For draw any line AB cutting the forces at right angles, and take moments about a point G in AB. Then if C is between A and 5, Moment of Couple = P x AC + P x BC = P x AB- y and if C is outside, as at C', Moment of Couple = P xAC'-Px EG' = PxAB. Thus P x AB is the moment about any point in AB ; and AB may be drawn anywhere. Hence, (1) the Moment of the Couple is the same about every point in its plane; and is measured by the product of either of the forces into the perpendicular distance between them, i.e. into the arm. \r P O' Fig. 85. Consider two couples with equal forces and arms, but in different positions with regard to a point 0. Neither of them has any resultant. The only effect of each is a torque, or tendency to turn the body about 0; and this is measured by the product of the force and arm, which is the same for each. The couples are therefore equivalent. Or look at it in this way. It is easy to find a point 0' which is placed with regard to the couple C precisely as is with regard to G'. The effect of C' about is then the same as that of G about 0'; or by (1), of C about 0. Hence, (2) a couple may be turned through any angle without altering its effect, and 182 MECHANICS [CHAP. (3) a couple may be removed to any other position in the plane without altering its effect. (4) Since the whole effect of a couple is measured by its moment, a couple may be replaced by any other couple in the same plane having an equal moment. (Or, directly from the forces, supposed parallel. Fig. 86. Let PP, QQ be two couples of equal moment, so that but acting in opposite senses. The resultant of P at B and Q at G is P + Q acting at a point such that PxBO=QxOC. But PxAB^QxCD, or PxAO=QxOR /. the resultant of P at A and Q at D is P + Q acting at the same point 0, but in the opposite direction. The couples therefore balance, so that a couple P x AB is equivalent to another couple Q x CD of equal moment acting in the same sense.) (5) Any number of couples in a plane may be replaced by a single couple of the same total moment. Since the only effect of a couple is its torque, measured by its moment, this follows from the physical independence of forces XVlll] FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE 183 implied in the Second Law of Motion. But for the sake of the importance of the subject we will now deduce this (and incident- ally all the previous propositions) directly from the parallelogram of forces. The student may draw the figure for himself. 178. Consider two couples with forces PP' and QQ', and in order to take the most general case let the forces of the one couple be not parallel to the forces of the other couple. If the lines of action of the four forces be produced, they will form a parallelogram A BCD, the sides AB and CD being the lines of action of the forces P and P' of the one couple, and the sides AD and CB being the lines of action of the forces Q and Q' of the other couple. But the resultant of P and Q is a force R acting through A, and having a moment about any point which is the algebraical sum of the moments of P and Q. Also the resultant of P' and Q' is a force R' acting at C, and equal and opposite to R. Thus the two forces R and R' form a couple which is in all cases the resultant of the two original couples. And since the moment of a couple is the sum of the moments of its component forces, we see at once from Varignon's Theorem that the resultant couple has a moment which is the algebraical sum of the moments of the original couples. Again, when the moments of the original couples are equal and opposite, the resultant couple has no moment, that is, the original couples balance each other. In this case R and R' are not only equal and opposite, but they act along the same line. 179. II. Three or more Forces. Any number of forces acting at different points in a plane can always be reduced to a single force acting at any point and a couple. Let P be one of the forces, acting at a point A. Take any convenient origin 0, and apply at it two equal opposite forces each equal and parallel to P. This balancing pair of forces will not alter the effect. 184 MECHANICS [CHAP. But the three forces are now equivalent to (1) a force P acting at 0, and (2) a couple of moment P.p. Fig. 87. Let the same be done for all the other forces. The system reduces to (1) the forces transferred from their actual points of application, and all acting at 0; (2) a set of couples. The resultant of (1) may be found by 164. The couples (2) are equivalent to a single couple of moment equal to the sum of their moments. We may carry the simplification one step further, and reduce the system to a single force, or a couple. For if the resultant force does not vanish, let the couple be replaced by another couple of equal moment, but with forces each equal to the resultant force. Let this couple be turned round its axis till one of its forces "is directly opposed to the resultant force. Then these two vanish, and the system reduces to the other force of the couple ; i.e. to a single force. In the case where the resultant force vanishes the system obviously reduces to the couple. XVIII] FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE 185 180. It is often more convenient to choose two axes of reference, and to resolve each force into its components in these directions before transferring to the origin. Thus : X y Fig. 88 Let the position of p, the point of application of the force P, fixed by the co-ordinates ON=x, Np = y t and let the com- ponents of P parallel to the axes be X and Y. Then X may be replaced by (1) X acting at along Ox, and (2) a couple Xy. Y may be replaced by (1) Y acting at along Oy, and (2) a couple + Ycc. Let the same be done for all the forces, and let us indicate the sum of all products like Xy by ^Xy. The system reduces to 2JT and 2F acting at 0; and a set of couples 2 ( Yx Xy). The resultant of %X and SF will be a force R, and a single couple G may be found whose moment is equal to S ( Yx Xy). 186 MECHANICS [CHAP. 181. I. Two Forces. These must act along the same line in Conditions of Equili- brium for any Forces opposite directions, and be equal in mag- in one Plane. * 1 _ nitude. 182. II. Three Forces. If three forces are in equilibrium, they either meet in a point, or are parallel. For if two of them meet, their resultant goes through their meeting point, and can only be balanced by a force passing through that point; but if two of them are parallel, their resultant is parallel to them, and therefore so is the force which is to balance them. Very many problems occur in which the lines of action of two out of the three forces are known, and the solution depends on making the third force pass through their point of intersection. The magnitudes of the forces are then generally given by Lami's Theorem, or some geometrical application of the Triangle of Forces. In the case of parallel forces we have R = P + Q and PxAC=Qx0. 183. III. Any number of Forces. Let them be reduced to a single force R acting at any point ; and a couple G. Since a Couple cannot be balanced by a force, it is necessary for equilibrium that both the force and the couple should vanish separately. Thus R = 0\ 0-OJ* These are equivalent to and i.e. (1) the sums of the resolved parts of all the forces in any two directions at right angles must be separately zero; and XVIIl] FORCES ACTING ANYWHERE IN A PLANE 187 (2) the sum of the moments of all the forces (or of their com- ponents} about any point must vanish. The conditions (1) secure that there shall be no movement of translation, while (2) must be satisfied if there is to be no rotation. 184. The general procedure in solving a Statical problem Method of Solving iSHSfolloWS: statical Problems. (i) D raw a figure and see that all the external forces, as well as any internal reactions that are to be considered, are properly represented. (2) Select some body or system of bodies, and write down the conditions of equilibrium for it; i.e. choose any convenient axes at right angles ; resolve the forces acting on the system along them, and equate the sums of the resolved parts to zero; and " take moments" about any convenient point, equating the sum of the moments to zero. It is most important, as in Dynamics ( 128), to settle quite definitely what is to be the system considered when writing down each equation. The two equations of the resolved parts, and the one of moments, in general suffice to determine two co-ordinates of some point in each body, and one angle fixing its azimuth about the point. For each unknown reaction, such as a pressure between bodies in contact, or the tension of a string, a geometrical relation can be written down; so that there will be as many equations as quantities to be found. By choosing axes at right angles to some of the forces, and by taking moments about points through which their directions pass, we can often prevent forces whose values are unknown, or not wanted, from entering into the equations, and obtain what we want from one of the equations of resolution, or from the equation of moments alone. A proper choice of axes and points for taking moments will greatly simplity most problems. 188 MECHANICS [CHAP. EXAMPLES. 1. A uniform beam of weight W can turn about a hinge at one end A, and is drawn aside from the vertical by a horizontal force P applied to the other end B. Find the position of equilibrium and the reaction at the hinge. Consider the beam. Three forces act on it, P, W, and the reaction R at the hinge. Hence R must go through the meeting point of P and W. Let 2a be the length of the beam ; #, < the inclinations to the vertical of the beam and of the reaction R. It * T >p (1) By Lami's Theorem W sin < cos Whence 72 is known. By Geometry tan
,
about the normal at the
point of contact as axis. It
is clear that the resultant
reaction may lie anywhere
inside this cone, but not out-
v"
Fig. 91.
132
196
MECHANICS
[CHAP.
side of it. This consideration often serves to solve a problem by
inspection.
For example, a beam is at rest but on the point of motion,
inside a rough sphere, in a vertical plane through the centre.
To find its inclination 6 to the vertical.
B
Fig. 92.
Let /Lt = tana be the coefficient of friction for the 'beam and
the sphere. Draw the cones of friction at A and B. Then since
all the friction is called into play to prevent motion, the resultant
reactions at A and B must lie along the edges AC, BG of the
cones. The only other force acting on the beam is its weight. The
three forces must meet in a point ( 182), so that the vertical
through G passes through the centre of gravity. Let the beam
subtend an angle 2/3 at the centre of the circle.
Then
tACG = 0- *CAG = 0- (90 - - a.) = a + + 6 - 90.
Z BGG = 180 - 6 - Z CBG = 180 - 6 - (90 - + a)
= 90 - (a - ft + 0).
XIX] FRICTION 197
If the C.G. divide the beam in the ratio ra : n, we see, by drawing
horizontals through A and B to the vertical CGW, that
m = AC sin ACG _ AC. cos (a + ft + 0)
n ~ BC sin BCG ~~ BC . cos (a - ft + 0}
cos (a - ft) cos (a + + fl)
" cos (a + ft) cos (a - ft + 0) '
whence may be found.
189. In the Simple Machines friction plays a very important
part and cannot be neglected. In the case of the Screw and the
Wedge its effects render the ordinary formulae practically useless.
Recourse must then be had to direct experiment.
The student is strongly recommended to consult Sir Robert
Ball's Experimental Mechanics for an admirable treatment of the
principal machines with friction, with apparatus and weights on a
practical scale. He will learn much besides from this book, as
well the scientific method of dealing with sets of observations on
variable quantities like friction, as the habit of keeping concrete
facts in view when studying principles.
190. One general consideration may be mentioned. A part
of the work done by the force applied to a machine is absorbed
in overcoming the friction. It is converted into other forms of
energy, not destroyed. But it is lost for mechanical purposes. The
remainder is the useful work done by the machine.
Let EI = the " lost " work.
E u = the useful work.
Pj = the force required to balance the weight when the
machine works forwards.
P t = the force when the machine works backwards.
a = the distance moved by the " Power " handle.
Then P,a = E u + E h
-P 2 ot = E u EI,
for when the machine works backwards, the friction aids the
" Power."
Thus
198
MECHANICS
[CHAP.
This fraction which expresses the ratio of the useful work
done to the total work done by the "Power" is called the Efficiency
of the machine.
If the efficiency =|, P 2 is zero, so that no force is required
to prevent the machine from running backwards, as friction is
sufficient in itself to stop it ; and this is a fortiori the case for
smaller values of the efficiency.
For example, the Differential Pulley, as usually constructed,
has an efficiency less than one half. The chain may thus be let
go at any stage without risk of the machine running backwards.
This useful property compensates for the waste of more than half
the work done.
It is on this property that the usefulness of the Wedge
depends; for only in virtue of friction can it be driven in by a
series of blows, since otherwise it would slip back between each
blow and the next.
This instrument is a double inclined plane. The " Power " is
applied parallel to the common base, and the
The Wedge. r * ... ., i j j j
resistance or the material to be divided acts as
a pressure on the two faces.
Let 2a be the angle of the wedge ; At the coefficient of friction.
Then by resolving along
the central line,
P = 2R sin a 4- 2j*R cos a .
and
-5 = 2 (sin a + ft cos a).
JK
Apart from friction it is
clear that by making a very
small we may reduce this
ratio as much as we please,
Fig. 93.
so that a very small force will overcome a great resistance.
In cutting or piercing instruments the edges or points are
Theory of the ground down to an excessively small angle. The
Knife - mechanical advantage may be still further in-
creased by pushing or drawing the knife along, instead of pressing
it in perpendicularly.
XIX] FRICTION 199
For if the pressure be applied in the direction D'C (Fig. 94),
inclined at an angle /3 to the edge of the knife, instead of along
A
A'
Fig. 94.
DC, the effective angle of the edge is A'CB' instead of ACB, and
this may be made as small as we choose by sufficiently inclining
D'C.
If friction is neglected, the formula will in this case be
p
-^ = 2 sin a. . sin /3.
For the knife is supposed to be actuated by an oblique thrust
P along D'C, and a pressure F at right angles to D'C, applied by
smooth guides which compel it to travel in this direction, or by
the hand itself. The forces F and R cos a are at right angles to
CD', hence resolving along CD' we obtain the above equation.
(Or by Lami's Theorem
P F = 2R sina
sin j8 ~" cos |8 ~ sin 90 '
p
and therefore -^ = 2 sin a . sin /3.
zi
The same result follows from the principle of Work. For if the knife be
moved obliquely along D'C till it has sunk in to a vertical depth DC, no work
is done by the pressure F t or by the forces R sin a, since their points of
application remain at the same vertical height throughout. Hence the
work done by P is equal to that done against the two thrusts R cos a. Now
these forces have their points of application separated by a distance AB } so
that the work done against them is R cos a.AB.
200
MECHANICS
[CHAP.
Therefore P . CD' = R cos a . AB,
an equation which at once leads to the formula
Another case of great practical importance is that of a rope
wound round a rough post.
191. Let a rope be passed round a rough circular post and
pulled at one end by a force T, while being held
wound 0n ro u n ndr pe back by a force T Q at the other. We will in-
posf h circular vestigate the relation between T and T in the
case when T Q is barely sufficient to prevent the
rope from slipping. Let the part of the rope in contact with the
post subtend an angle a at the centre.
R.PQ
Fig. 95.
Consider a short length of the rope PQ subtending a small
angle e^ = - at the centre.
ft
Let R be the normal pressure per unit length of the rope.
Then the pressure on PQ is R x PQ, and the friction is jj,R . PQ.
Let the tensions at P and Q be TI and T z .
XIX] FRICTION 201
Resolving along the tangent and normal at P we have
T z . cos a^T. + ^R. PQ,
T, . sin ai = R . PQ.
Now ultimately, when Oj is very small, cos ^ 1, and sin fl^ = c^.
Also, if a is the radius of the post, PQ = ao^.
Thus 2 7 a = T 1 + /*.Z T a a 1 .
In the term pT^ we may put T t for T 2 , since the small
difference between them, when multiplied by the small quantity
!, will be negligible compared with the value of T& itself.
Hence
r.-r, (1
Let the tension at the end of the next short length QS,
subtending a x at the centre, be T s . Then, as above,
Proceeding in this way we see that if we start from a place
where the tension is T (say, where the rope first touches the post),
the tension T at any other point at an angular distance a from the
start is given by
n J
Writing - for the small fraction , we have
If ! is taken very small, n and x become very large, and in
the limit, for which alone the above reasoning is accurate, n and x
become infinitely great.
Now hv the Trinomial Theorem
3ome infinitely great.
Now by the Binomial Theorem
/ IV* 1 x.x 1 1
1 x.x \ .x 2 1
1.2 ' 1.2.3 + '"
202 MECHANICS [CHAP.
when x is infinitely large, since the part of each term neglected is
infinitely small compared with what is retained.
It is proved in books on Algebra that this series is convergent,
and, as more and more terms are taken, constantly approaches a
finite limit between 2 and 3 in value. In fact it is the base of
the natural system of logarithms, commonly denoted by e, and
has the value
6 = 271828....
Thus T=T*