ft 
 
 'YA 105 15 30 
 
 W =5 
 
 8B
 
 REMARKS 
 
 s\, 
 
 A 
 
 O N 
 
 SOME STRICTURES 
 
 LATELY PUBLISHED, 
 
 ENTITLED 
 
 OBSERVATIONS UPON THE STATUTE TIT. XIV. 
 
 DE VESTITU ET HABITU SCHOLASTICO : 
 WlTH A BRIEF STATE OF THE CONTROVERSY 
 
 WHICH GAVE OCCASION TO THEM. 
 
 OXFORD. 
 
 M DCC LXX.
 
 REMARKS 
 
 IN Lent term laft the Servitors of Chrift- 
 Church contrary to exprefs ftatute and 
 immemorial ufage appeared in the acade- 
 mical habit of Foundationers. The Founda- 
 tioners of feveral Colleges, who had hitherto 
 conformed to their ftatutable habit, were 
 juftly offended at this fingular innovation ; 
 and, having loft the distinction which the 
 ftatute had given them, naturally looked out 
 for a new one in the habit of a Bachelor. 
 Thefe fudden alterations attracted the notice 
 of the Magistrate : the Hebdomadal Meeting 
 took them intoconfideration, and recommend- 
 ed it to the Vice-Chancellor and Proctors " to 
 " put the ftatute in execution, and reduce 
 " both orders to their proper habit." A few 
 days after, fome members of the Hebdomadal 
 Meeting propofed a different meafure, which, 
 after mature deliberation, was carried againil 
 the fenfe of the fenior part of the Board by a 
 fmall majority. The fubftance of this refolu- 
 tion was communicated to the Public in a 
 A 
 
 1051530
 
 printed paper, which, to prevent any miflake, 
 I mall tranfcribe verbatim ; it is as follows : 
 
 " I. Clerks -fervientes, a fervitors whether 
 " exhibitioners or not, chorifters, to wear 
 " .fcholars' gowns and fquare caps without 
 < tufts." 
 
 " II. Glerks-non-Jervientesy* fcholars, demys, 
 " poftmafters, ftudents of Chrift-Church, un- 
 " dergraduate fellows, to wear fcholars' gowns, 
 " fquare caps and tufts." 
 
 " III. Bachelors to wear their prefent drefs 
 " with the addition of the efomis or tippet." 
 
 Several members of Convocation objected 
 to thefe regulations ; they affirmed that part 
 of them were contrary to flatute ; and quef- 
 tioned the authority that enjoined them : they 
 therefore made application to the Proctors to 
 reprefs the innovations prefcribed by this 
 printed paper j " to put the flatute in execu- 
 " tion, and reduce foundationers and fervitors 
 " to their proper habit." The Proctors re- 
 ported to the Hebdomadal Meeting .that they 
 had received fuch application : the obfcrva- 
 tion made thereupon by the Board, was 
 " that the printed paper referred to is not 
 
 * I have taken the liberty to infert thefe words, as being 
 afterwards added to the printed paper by the hebdomadal 
 meeting.
 
 ( 3 ) 
 
 " confidered as having the force of a ftatute." 
 From this declaration it was reafonably con- 
 cluded that the faid paper was neither ftatute, 
 nor an authoritative precept founded on fta- 
 tute, nor a repeal or fufpenfion of ftatute : it 
 was therefore no rule at all ; and the ftatute 
 de iieftitu & habitu fcbolaftico remained in as 
 full force as if fuch paper had never been 
 written. The Junior Pro&or together with 
 all the Deputies who were then in the Uni- 
 verlity iffued out, ex officio, a Moneo or Pro- 
 gramma declaring the fenfe of the ftatute and 
 requiring obedience to it. This Moneo there- 
 fore, declaratory of ftatute and promulgated 
 by competent authority, is a rule of action 
 to the parties defcribed therein fo far as the 
 fubjecl: matter extends ; and will continue to 
 be fuch, till it is virtually revoked by another 
 Moneo equally ftatutable and authentick. 
 The laft day of Lent Term an Undergraduate 
 Foundationer appeared in the Profcholinm of 
 the Divinity School as a candidate for a Ba- 
 chelor's degree in an irregular habit, which 
 he was known to have worn ever fince the 
 publication of the Programma. The Houfe 
 thought proper to repel him from his degree : 
 this tranfadion is fuppofed to have given oc- 
 cafion to THE OBSERVATIONS ; which we 
 come now to confider.
 
 ( 4 ) 
 
 THE ingenious Author of thefe obferva- 
 tions, having briefly explained the flatute, and 
 taken notice of it's univerfal and perpetual 
 obligation, enumerates feveral deviations from 
 the letter of it which the Governours of the 
 Univerfity have long permitted to take place 
 in the article of Vejlitm or Common Apparel. 
 He offers a candid plea for their connivance 
 at thefe irregularities : I think his plea, fo far 
 as it is applicable, is fatisfactory j only obfer- 
 ving by the way, that to make us appear like 
 ." fanatical round heads" is very far from the 
 letter and fpirit of the flatute and canon ' well 
 confidered and underflood. For the truth of 
 this obfervation I appeal to fact : the Heads 
 of Houfes, the Canons of Chrift-Church, and 
 feveral other Clergymen, do actually " habit 
 " themfelves according to the precife mode 
 " prefcribed by the flatute;" fome of the Lay 
 members of the Univeriity, the Collectors, 
 for inflance, and gentlemen in mourning, fre- 
 quently do the fame : and yet I believe they 
 were never pointed out as " fanatical or ridi- 
 " culous." 
 
 The author proceeds to mention fimilar de- 
 viations from the flatute in the Habitus or 
 Academical Drefs : he endeavours on the fame 
 
 a See Canon 74.
 
 ( 5 ) 
 
 principle to juftify thefe irregularities, and 
 alfo to recommend a new one. The chief ir- 
 regularity he would juftify is that of the Un- 
 dergraduate Foundationer wearing a tuft, and 
 his gown in the prefent form : the new one 
 he would recommend is that of a Bateller and 
 Servitor wearing the ftatutable habit of a 
 Foundationer. The principle is * { Decorum, 
 or the expediency of departing from the 
 letter of the ftatute in a matter of fo variable 
 a nature as habit or drefs, in conformity to 
 common ufage and the fafhion of the times ; 
 and thus better anfwering the true delign 
 and fpirit of it, which was doubtlefs to make 
 every clafs of Academics, in due order and 
 gradation, refpectable." The Principle is Li- 
 beral : we will Suppofe it Juft. But it muft, 
 like every other plea urged in derogation of 
 Written Law, be ftriclly taken and cautioufly 
 applied : for in truth, " Decorum, Propriety, 
 " Conveniency," and the like, are rules of in- 
 terpretation very vague and indeterminate; 
 and if ever they mould be deemed fufficient, 
 without very preffing and apparent reaibn, 
 " to abrogate a pofitive ftatute," they would 
 foon reduce us to that undefirable flate wherein 
 they will be our only guides.
 
 Now I would beg leave to aik, taking thitf 
 Principle of Decorum in it's full extent, what 
 is the objection to the flatutable habit of the 
 Foundationer ? Is there any thing in it which 
 on a comparifon with any drefs or habit out of 
 the Univerfity would "expofe us to the ridicule 
 " of all the world ?" Or which in reference to 
 other academical habits finks the wearer be- 
 low his proper level ? Does it not approach 
 as near as it poffibly can to that of the Ba- 
 chelor ? Or, if in neither of thefe views it 
 appear unbecoming, has it contracted any flam 
 by it's application ? Has it not 'till within 
 thefe two months been worn by gentlemen's 
 ions, upon Foundations as refpe&able, without 
 exception, as any in the Univerfity ? Surely 
 the Principle and the Statute are not at 
 variance. 
 
 I would inquire upon the fame grounds 
 what is there fo highly inconvenient in the 
 modern ftatutable habit of the Batteller or 
 Servitor ? Is not his gown excepting the lead 
 poffible variation the fame as the Commoner's ? 
 and would not the propofed reform render his 
 habit equal or fuperior to the Commoner's, 
 and give the Commoner juft ground to com- 
 plain, and afpire to the Gentleman Commoner's 
 &c. &c. &c. eff. ? " But the cap is a mark
 
 ( 7 ) 
 
 " of Servility which it is illiberal to conti- 
 " nue ; the wearer does not appear like a 
 " Gentleman ; Humanity pleads* againft the 
 " ftatute." If the objection be true, it is un- 
 anfwerable : if the form of the cap render 
 his fituation lefs comfortable or refpectable, I 
 wim it were altered : although I humbly ap- 
 prehend, that a little more condefcenfion and 
 countenance from his fuperiors at home would 
 contribute in far greater proportion to his 
 comfort and decent eftimation, than any im- 
 provement in his public habit ; but if his fu- 
 periors have not " Humanity" enough to treat 
 him like a " Gentleman" within his own 
 walls, in vain will he endeavour to appear like 
 one abroad. However, if an alteration in this 
 inftance be expedient on the Principle above- 
 mentioned, mould it not on the fame prin- 
 ciple be as Small as poffible ? for there is alfo 
 a Decorum to be kept with our Statutes. If 
 nothing is more certain than that the primary 
 (if indeed not the only) diftinclion intended 
 by ftatute in the undergraduate habit, was 
 between the Foundationer's and the Non- 
 Foundationer's, which diftinclion we have al- 
 ready loft in refpect of the Cap, why fhould 
 it be wantonly confounded in the Gown alfo, 
 without any reafon of expediency or decency
 
 ( 8 ) 
 
 whatfoever, indeed contrary to both ? (At 
 prefent I put Exhibitioner-Battellers out of 
 the queftion.) Can any caufe be affigned why 
 the loweft clafs of Undergraduates Non-Foun- 
 dationers (hall, in preference to every other 
 Non - Foundationer, and in common with 
 Foundationers, wear the Gown of a Bachelor ? 
 and this in direct oppofition not to the letter 
 only but to the Spirit of the ftatute 3 ? We 
 mall furely make Decorum a Felo-de-fe. 
 
 It may be a{ked, why does the Principle 
 of Decorum operate fo freely on the Statute 
 De Vejlitu, and not on that De Habitu Aca- 
 demlco ? why is a deviation from the written 
 law fo readily admitted in ,one cafe and fo re- 
 luctantly in another ? The reafon is obvious. 
 Ordinary Apparel is of a variable nature ; we 
 wear it in common with the reft, of our 
 countrymen ; there is therefore a Standard to 
 which we may be conftantly referred, and 
 from which if we differ extremely we may 
 become ridiculous : though it is ppffible we 
 may be too delicate even in this point. But 
 in the Academical Habit the cafe is widely 
 
 a I will venture to fuppofe that there are not three gentle- 
 men in the Univerfity who confider the ftatutes with any 
 degree of attention, that think this innovation defenfible on 
 any principles whatfoever.
 
 ( 9 ) 
 
 different ; it is Intended to diftinguifh us from 
 the reft of the world, as well as from each 
 other ; it has therefore no ftandard abroad to 
 which it can be referred, or need to be ac- 
 commodated j if it be not at variance with 
 itfelf, that is fufficient. There is indeed a 
 general Decorum and Propriety which mould 
 be uniformly diffufed over every part of it ; as 
 that it be grave yet not fordid, that the gra- 
 duate's habit have more dignity than the un- 
 dergraduate's, and the like : but this, being 
 once well afcertained, is of a permanent na- 
 ture ; and the habit once adopted becomes 
 moreover by conftant ufage and application 
 infeparably connected with the idea it is to 
 convey, and thus obtains an artificial advan- 
 tage over any new one that can be fuggefted. 
 The cafe is the fame with other Regular or 
 Official Habits, thofe of Peers, for inftance, 
 of Judges, or City Magiftrates. They have 
 their Effect from their fingularity, and from 
 the uniformity of their figure and application. 
 A Judge is not expected to wear his Ordinary 
 Apparel like his predecelTors in the laft cen- 
 tury : but mould he vary the Fafhion of his 
 Official Habit every fpring, or change it, for 
 the robes of a Duke, for inftance, or an Al- 
 derman of London, upon every alteration in 
 B the
 
 the Miniftry, his drefs might indeed be " as 
 " becoming as poffible," but would foon ceafe 
 to engage reverence. The Judge's Cap is not 
 very modern or graceful, but I believe no 
 criminal ever received a ludicrous or unfuitable 
 impreflion from it; nor did any fenfible man 
 ever find himfelf offended by it, or wifh to 
 fee his Lordmip put on a fafhionable hat. Jufi 
 ib in the Univerfity : habits handed down to 
 us from our anceflors, ftampt with the vene- 
 rable imprefs of law and duty, are as figni- 
 ficant as words ; but if they are to fhift their 
 meaning and acceptation continually, they 
 will foon have none at all: it is an eafy tran- 
 fition from a contempt of the fign to a con- 
 tempt of the thing fignified j and if young 
 men are thus taught by their Seniors to inter- 
 pret away the meaning of plain ftatutes by 
 capricious principles of " Decorum, Common 
 '* Confent, Propriety, Virtual Abrogation," 
 and the like, they will foon think meanly of 
 the Authority that enjoins them, and of the 
 Officers who are to put them in execution : 
 (a confequence already verified in more in- 
 ftances than one a :) they will naturally be led 
 
 * A Servitor the other day, during an examination in the 
 natural philofophy fchool, had the aflurance, after feveral 
 other Indecorums, to place hirafelf in the Vice-Chancellor's 
 feat : the Regent Mafters could not reduce him to order with- 
 out interrupting the examination, and offering to go for i
 
 ( II ) 
 
 to imagine, that if, in the opinion of fenfiblc 
 and ingenious men, Statute Tit. xiv. is by fome 
 invifible operation become a dead letter, Sta- 
 tute Tit. xv. may poffibly be fo too : that, 
 if the Prodlor is not to be obeyed in one ex- 
 ertion of ftatutable powers, he is not in another: 
 that they have fworn obedience to ftatutes 
 whofe Senfe and Obligation is equally uncer- 
 tain -, to which fome Grave Cafuift may every 
 morning give a different Interpretation or 
 fubjoin a new EPINOMIS; referring them, 
 not to their Domeftic or Public Governours, 
 to " the Heads of Colleges or to the Houfe 
 " of Convocation, but to General Principles ;" 
 which are indeed the bafis of every poiitive 
 institution, but ought not, by an unnatural ap- 
 plication, to be raifed up as batteries againfl 
 it. I do not mean to reflect upon the teachers : 
 but I take the freedom to charge the DocTrine 
 with it's proper confequences ; and I believe 
 I am not fingular in my manner of deducing 
 them. 
 
 TH E Author of the obfervations feems to 
 confine his views entirely to Chrifl-Church : 
 if he thinks the Gentlemen whofe opinions he 
 is difcuffing ad: under any perfonal or colle- 
 giate prejudices, it may be fafely affirmed that 
 ' B 2
 
 he does 'not do them juftice. The writer of 
 thefe remarks can truly declare for his own 
 part (what he knows to be equally true of 
 many others) that he has a perfect refpect for 
 the Society, and a fincere friendfhip for feveral 
 of it's members. It is not therefore his wifh 
 to make particular applications ; however, as 
 the Author has fet him the example, he doubts 
 not he mall be candidly attended to if he takes 
 the liberty of following it. 
 
 It is alledged "that Undergraduate Fellows, 
 <c and fuch as are confidered to be of the fame 
 " rank, have worn tufts ; and that the Stu- 
 cc dents of Ch rift- Church have been generally 
 "confidered, and have a right to confider 
 " themfelves, to be of this rank." 
 
 Now this practice of Undergraduate Fellows 
 being allowed on all hands to be " contrary to 
 "ftatute as explained by implication and antient 
 " ufage," (which by the way is fully con- 
 firmed by Loggan's Delineations, to which 
 as to authentic patterns we are juftly referred,) 
 it can be defended only on the principle of 
 Decorum. Now what Indecorum can poffi- 
 bly refult from Undergraduate Fellows wear- 
 ing the fame habit with Undergraduate Scho- 
 lars, or what tc notions of Conveniency, Pro- 
 " priery, or Decency can virtually abrogate a
 
 ( '3 ) 
 
 c * plain ftatute" as to the words Socii, Proba- 
 tionarn, and not as to the words next follow- 
 ing in apportion, ScMares, Cafe/lam, &c, it 
 is really not eafy to comprehend. It may be 
 anfwered, the fame notions that long fince 
 abrogated the ftatute as to Commenfalcs, Com- 
 munarii, but has not yet quite annulled it as 
 to Battellarii, Seruienfes. I will take this 
 opportunity of obferving, that we are not 
 bound to juftify the errors of our predeceflbrs, 
 mucn lefs to follow them, nor indeed always 
 to correct them ; at leaft it will be candid to 
 begin with Our Own. But I think, upon the 
 principles we are fuppofed to have adopted, a 
 reafonable account may be given of this mat- 
 ter. Non-foundationers are of various parent- 
 age, fortunes, and expectations ; there is a 
 decorum in giving precedence here to fuch as 
 have claim to it abroad ; different fortunes and 
 expectations require different Sumptuary laws; 
 and the attention paid by the ftatutes to Noble- 
 men plainly mew they are not averfe to fuch 
 diftinclions : now thefe conliderations natu- 
 rally lead to a Diftin&ion in Habit. On the 
 other hand, Foundationers are in birth and 
 fortune for the moft part near upon an equa- 
 lity ; when it is otherwife it is by accident, 
 and if a gentleman of family places his foil
 
 ( 14 ) 
 
 upon a foundation, he is understood to mew 
 the greater refpeft to academic inftitutions ; 
 to imagine he defired any partial infringe- 
 ment of them would furely be a very unhand- 
 fome return : they are all without diftin&ion 
 Eleemofynary ; they all in different propor- 
 tions eat the bread of their Founder, only 
 one has a firmer eftablifhment in his family 
 than another as his lot may happen j and it 
 feems to be no dictate of reafon (nor of " hu- 
 " manity" if you will) that the lefs fuccefsful 
 Candidate mall be marked out by a difrinftion 
 of habit which the laws by which he is go- 
 verned do not impofe. Befides the difference 
 is frequently only in name ; a perpetual Scho- 
 lar, or one entitled to fucceed to a Fellowship, 
 has almoft as firm an eftablifhment as a per- 
 petual Fellow. The prudence and moderation 
 of our predeceffors is remarkable in this in- 
 ftance : they fuffered no distinction of habit 
 to prevail among Foundationers : a they ad- 
 ded b to the gown of Some Non-Foundationers 
 a limited number of ornamental buttons or 
 tafTels, to that of others a few more ; but the 
 effential fafhion ever remained entire : they 
 
 * Sec Loggan. 
 
 b See Minutes of the Hebdomadal Meetings in the Bod- 
 Jeian Library.
 
 ( '5 ) 
 
 appear herein to have been neither Haves to 
 the letter of their ftatutes, nor tyrants over the 
 fpirit of them j but to have had a filial reve- 
 rence for both. If this reafoning be juft, 
 it is of as little confequence to the Students 
 of Chrift-Church in refpect of their habit as 
 it is on other accounts, whether they be Fel- 
 lows, or of like rank with Fellows. Indeed 
 if the defcription given of them, had it been 
 accurate, would have proved them to be Fel- 
 lows, it would follow that half the Scholars 
 in the Univeriity are fo too ; and it were very 
 eafy to mew from the a antient as well as ^mo- 
 dern idea of a College or Society, who are 
 Socii and who are not. But it matters not 
 what is their charter ftyle or ftatutable deno- 
 mination; if they deiire to be confidered as 
 Fellows, they pay a compliment to the Order, 
 which it is prefumed the Gentlemen of that 
 order will not fail to return : they are certainly 
 a Refpe&able Body ; and their Undergraduate 
 Members have undoubtedly as good a claim 
 to the ornament in queftion as any other 
 Foundationer, who pleads no fpecial dilpenfa- 
 tion or compofition with the Univeriity. 
 
 See Digefts pafftm : particularly III. 4. i . i. XLYII.a2,4 
 
 k Sec College Statutes and Regifters paffim.
 
 ( '6 ) 
 
 if is fuggefted that the Servitors of Chrift- 
 Church are Exhibitioners, and that Exhibi- 
 tioners are Foundationers. Be it admitted that 
 Exhibitioners are Foundationers : are All the 
 Servitors of Chrift- Church Exhibitioners ? if 
 not, why is the practice extended beyond the 
 theory that is to fupport it ? Befides, if all 
 Exhibitioners are Foundationers, it will fol- 
 low that as fuch, whether originally Servitors 
 or Commoners, they are indifpenfibly bound 
 by Statute to wear the Foundationer's Habit : 
 if therefore any Society prefcribe this Habit 
 to their Exhibitioner-Servitors and not to their 
 Exhibitioner -Commoners, they act inconfif- 
 tently with their own hypothecs, and infal- 
 libly expofe one order or the other to the cen- 
 fure of the Magiftrate. But in truth the 
 learned Author of the obfervations needs not 
 not to be told what conftitutes a Founda- 
 tioner ; he knows that the Doctrine in difpute 
 is novel and occafional ; that the common 
 ftyle of an Exhibitor is that " he bequeathes 
 "to the Dean and Chapter of A, or to the 
 (t Mafter and Fellows of B, or to the Skin- 
 " ner's Company in London, two hundred 
 " pounds in truft that io/. per annum be paid 
 " to a poor Commoner, Scholar, Bateller, to- 
 " wards his better maintenance &c." thus de-
 
 ( '7 ) 
 
 fcribing his College-Rank, and leaving it as he 
 found it ; that an Exhibition is tenable with a 
 Fellowfhip in the fame College j that if this 
 new doctrine prevailed, " the Burfar of a Col- 
 " lege might at a moderate expence endow in 
 " half an hour as many Scholarfhips, Chaplain- 
 <c (hips &c. as his pious and munificent Foun- 
 der could do with ample revenues in his whole 
 "life!" 
 
 BUT whatever may happen to be the fenti- 
 ments of the Author of the obfervations, or of 
 the Writer of thefe remarks, the matter in de- 
 bate remains ftill undecided : the Students of 
 Chrift- Church and others have worn tufts for 
 half a century j Servitors whether Exhibitioners 
 or not do wear Scholar's gowns and Square 
 Caps without Tufts to-day, and may wear them 
 with Tufts to-morrow ; Commoners affirmed 
 to be on a foundation, wear 'the habit of thofe 
 that are not on a foundation ; and there are 
 alfo Vifible Foundationers or portions of a Body 
 Corporate, where there is no Incorporation or 
 vifible or intelligible Foundation at all : and 
 contrary opinions are maintained upon thefe 
 fubjecls by members of the Univerfity refpect- 
 able by their office, fituation, and perfonal cha- 
 racter. What then is to be done ? 
 C
 
 THERE are two methods of deciding a con- 
 troverfy between different branches of the 
 fame Community : the one is by Reafon and 
 Argument, the other by a fair and honourable 
 Exertion of the powers which the Commu- 
 nity has veiled in the parties refpeftively. 
 The former is on all accounts more eligible ; 
 the latter, if the other has been tried in vain, 
 and the cafe require and deferve it, is not only 
 juftifiable but commendable. If a Member of 
 Convocation, who had a fmcere regard for the 
 honour and profperity of this Univerfity, and 
 was) not totally unacquainted with it's ftatutes, 
 cuftoms, and true interefts, were to enter into 
 the prefent controverly, he would probably 
 proceed in fome fuch manner as this : 
 
 He would propofe to the Gentlemen whofe 
 opinions he would wim to approve, with 
 lincere deference to office and ftation, but 
 with that ingenuity and freedom which be- 
 comes a man of liberal education, the fol- 
 lowing considerations. He would fuppofe, 
 that a due diftindtion of habit is a matter of 
 no fmall importance in every Univerlity : that 
 the ftatutes of this Univerfity indifpenfibly re- 
 quire it : that, on the moft General Princi- 
 ples, that diflinftion demands our firfl atten- 
 tion, which marks the Honours that are con-
 
 
 ( '9 ) 
 
 ceived to be the Rewards of Merit, and pre- 
 ferves in fome degree vifible thofe Great Lines 
 of Separation which the Legiflature has for 
 this purpofe chalked out before us : that fuch 
 a diftinftion as this will lie between the Gra- 
 duate and the Undergraduate, the Founda- 
 tioner and the Non-Foundationer : that the 
 more the Graduate is diftinguifhed from the 
 Undergraduate, the more will he command 
 a reafonable deference and excite an ufeful 
 emulation ; and therefore he mould, if pof- 
 fible, be diftinguifhed, ndt only in his Official 
 and more Solemn Ornaments, which are bur- 
 thenfome and oftentatious, and which therefore 
 convenience and modefty are apt to remit and 
 lay afide, but in his Ordinary and Standing 
 Habit : that of all the habits which might 
 anfwer thefe purpofes, thofe would be moft 
 eligible which have the venerable fan&ion of 
 Statute and Antient Ufage; efpecially if de- 
 cent in themfelves, and well correfponding with 
 others already fettled : and laftly, that the 
 'Toga talaris Jive non-manicata of the Batteller, 
 and the Toga laxe-manicata of the Founda- 
 tioner, precifely anfwer this whole defcrip- 
 tion % He would probably obferve further, that 
 to hold the Exhibitioner to be a Foundationer is 
 at befl a difputable doctrine, contrary to efta- 
 
 C 2
 
 ( 2 ) 
 
 blimed notions, lending indiredtly to erafe or 
 weaken one of the great lines abovemention- 
 ed, and productive of no good whatfoever; a 
 pofition which probably owes it exiftence to 
 the prefent controverfy, and may perhaps for- 
 tunately die with it. 
 
 If he was heard with candor and attention, 
 and anfwered with argument, he would be 
 open to conviction. But if, on the other hand, 
 the crude unftatutable regulations of one Do- 
 meftic Governour mould ftill be obtruded on 
 the whole Univerfity, he would be apt to afk 
 by what Authority they came recommended? 
 If they claimed the fanftion of the Hebdo- 
 madal Meeting, he would prefume that no 
 determination of that Refpectable Board is 
 intended to be a rule of public conduct, which 
 is not authentically publifhed and entered up- 
 on record : that if any refolution liable to juft 
 exception have happened to pafs their afient, 
 they have too much candour and moderation 
 to refufe a Rehearing. He would even add 
 (if neceffary, not otherwife) that the Heb- 
 domadal Meeting is indeed a very wife infti- 
 tution, but is of Modern Date : it can there- 
 fore claim no Powers by Prefcription ; the 
 Letter of it's Charter is the invariable limit ; 
 and the Charter is in every body's hands. The
 
 ( 21 ) 
 
 affertion might be fupported by a great autho- 
 rity, * but the cafe would be too plain to re- 
 quire it. 
 
 If it were poffible that he mould not be at- 
 tended to as a Reafonable Man, he would 
 laflly confider himfelf as a Member of that 
 Body which is in this place Supreme. He 
 would probably attend the houfe of convoca- 
 tion ; add one to the partial fufFrages com- 
 plained of by the Author of the obfervations ; 
 and Thus endeavour to vindicate the meafure 
 which he finds it necefTary to adopt : 
 
 " No violation of ftatute can poiTibly take 
 place in this Univerfity, but by the connivance 
 of every member thereof under whofe cogni- 
 zance the offending party muft pafs in the 
 courfe of Academic Difcipline. Every acting 
 member has the Statute Book for his guide, 
 to which he may appeal on all occafions, and 
 the appeal muft be admitted. If the Vice* 
 Chancellor or Proctors obferve an irregular 
 habit, they will either of them refpectively 
 execute the ftatute fo far as they fee fit : each 
 of the Deputy Proctors may do the fame, for 
 they are virtually admitted " ad Officium Pro- 
 " curatoris : " a Regent Mafter or other 
 
 a Mr Jultice Black/tone.
 
 Mafter of the Schools may deny an exercife 
 to pafs pro forma in an irregular habit ; and 
 that even though he allows it in another, be- 
 caufe he may poffibly judge on equitable 
 principles (be they " Decorum, Cuftom," or 
 any other ) the latter to be pardonable and 
 even expedient, the former to be neither : a 
 mafter of the ftreets may in like manner re- 
 prove or caufe to be punimed Junior Scholars 
 walking about idly in the ftreets abfque habitu 
 Jlbi competente, without any or with an irre- 
 gular one it makes no difference; and he may, 
 in cafe of contumacy, ftop their Degrees. 
 Laftly the Houfe of Congregation, when the 
 offending party follicits for his degree, and for 
 difpenfations which the ftatute permits them 
 to grant, are the Judges of his paft Academic 
 Life : for this purpofe they have befides their 
 own obfervation, to which the flatute has 
 plainly an eye in defcribing the Members of 
 Congregation, a Teftamurs, Atteftation of the 
 Dean, Scio's : the three latter tefts are ordi- 
 narily fufficient ; but not to the exclufion of 
 the former. The houfe may fairly and equi- 
 tably refufe Academic Honours to fuch as have 
 knowingly violated in their judgment whol- 
 fome and expedient laws : they may refufe 
 
 a Stat.ix. i. 3.6.
 
 C 23 ) 
 
 difpenfations with ftill greater reafon, as he 
 who follicits an indemnity for breach of Sta- 
 tute in fome instances fhould be fuppofed to 
 have been tolerably attentive to it in others. 
 It appears then that the connivance of One 
 Magiftrate is no fanclion for the violation of 
 any ftatute : there are in this cafe feveral Con- 
 current Jurifdiclions : the opinion of one is no 
 rule to the other : if they happen to agree on 
 an expedient meafure, it is well : if not, any 
 one of them may fay, the Magiftrate indivi- 
 dually, the Houfe by a Majority of Suffrages, 
 
 NOLUMUS LEGES ACADEMIC MUTARI, 
 QVJE HUC USQUE USITATJE SUNT ET AP- 
 PROBATE. The Law will fupport them at 
 all events ; and if they fay it candidly, dif- 
 creetly, and impartially, the reft of the Uni- 
 verfity will do fo too. 
 
 " But is it not hard thus to punifh a young 
 (< man for wearing an irregular habit, after 
 " the cuftom of his College, which has ob- 
 " tained for half a century ? " If it has ob- 
 tained for half a century, it is high time to 
 inquire by what right it has obtained. If by 
 partial indulgence of fucceffive Governors, the 
 Undergraduate Foundationers of other Col- 
 leges have been injured by thus having their 
 compeers raifed above them contrary to com-
 
 ( 24 ) 
 
 mon right : if by the connivance or permif- 
 fion of the acting Magiftrate for the time 
 being, it became the Houfe as the dernier re- 
 fort, to put an end to this unfair and partial 
 distribution of Juftice, and, like another Af- 
 fembly of higher rank, to bring things to a 
 regular account by denying the fupplies. 
 The degree of punifhment thus inflicted by 
 the Houfe for accumulated offences may per- 
 haps be greater than the ftatutable punimment 
 for one : but here it may be obferved once for 
 all, that the Houfe muft cenfure in the only 
 way it can ; not by inflicting penalties occa- 
 fionally, which is the province of the Magif- 
 trate, but by refufing favours and honours, 
 which is it's own. It takes no pleafure in ads 
 of feverity, but leaves thofe to anfwer for them 
 who render them necefTary. It is not material 
 " what difpenfation" is denied j if the Houfe 
 intends to refufe the degree, it properly enough 
 prevents lofs of time, by flopping the firft ftep 
 of the procefs. 
 
 But thefe are Partial feverities." The word 
 " partial" had better furely been omitted. It 
 reminds the moft Candid Reader, Who long 
 fince began to aflume partial favours ; and 
 now, by a Second violation of common right, 
 have accidently drawn down a cenfure on the
 
 ( 25 ) 
 
 Firft. But in truth the Members of the laft 
 Congregation intended no partial cenfures or 
 illiberal " Reprisals." They were determined to 
 enter an Effectual Proteft againft the operation 
 ot an Ordinance (according to their judgment) 
 inconvenient in it's matter, derogatory of fta- 
 tute, and pafTed by an incompetent jurifdic- 
 tion. The only Candidate who came within the 
 defcription of this Ordinance was a Student of 
 Chrift- Church, who had knowingly offended 
 againft the Statute de vejtifu & babiiu in dif- 
 obedience to the Authoritative Injunction of 
 the Magiftrate. No plea of ignorance or in- 
 attention was offered, to extenuate the fault-; 
 nor of particular lituation and circumftance, 
 to fufpend the cenfure. He appeared in his 
 irregular habit ; and was underftood to make 
 a public claim, under the Cuftom of his Col- 
 lege or the Ordinance or Both, of exemption 
 ( in this inftance ) from Statute and Procura- 
 torial Authority. His claim was rejected. If 
 the proceedings of that day mould be con- 
 firmed by future fufFrages, the Foundationers 
 of different Colleges will be put upon an 
 equal footing ; the leading diftinctions pre- 
 fcribed by flatute will be preferved ; and every 
 future accommodation or abrogation of ilatute, 
 D
 
 wherever it takes it's rife, will be more deli- 
 berately confidered, as it muft eventually pafs 
 the afTent of Convocation or Congregation. 
 As, happily, no Mifconftrudtion of ftatute 
 can oblige Either Houfe to difpenfe their 
 favours or their cenfures pro arbltrlo alfenus, 
 they cannot be obftrudted in the due execution 
 of their office : they can, whenever they fee 
 it expedient, reprefs effectually every violation 
 of ftatute, however ingenioufly palliated or 
 vigoroufly fupported."
 
 A 000020389 3