Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2008 witii funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.arcliive.org/details/elizabethqueenOOcreiricli QUEEN ELIZABETH QUEEN ELIZABETH MANDELL CREIGHTON, D.D. OxoN. and Cam. LORD BISHOP OF LONDON WITH PORTRAIT NEW IMPRESSION LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO, 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY 1900 jifsy^y First puUishtd by M$ssrs. Boussod, Valadon & Co. in July, 1896, with numtrous ilhtstratioiu, Rtprinttd March, 1899 ; Junt, 1899; January, 1900. PREFACE TO NEW EDITION. The object which I had before me in writing the following pages was to sketch the life of Elizabeth as plainly as possible. I have en- deavoured to illustrate a character rather than to write the history of a time. But Elizabeth's life was so closely interwoven with the history of England that it is impossible to separate her actions from public affairs, and I have been drawn into general history more often than I wished. I can only say that I have endeav- oured not to wander into any matters which were not necessary for an explanation of Eliza- beth's conduct, and that I have only enlarged the stage to find room for the actor. It was impossible within my limits to do more than sketch a rough outline of a very complex personality, which reflected only too 119847 vi PREFACE. faithfully the perplexities of a very difficult time. Such an attempt was only possible owing to the amount of detailed work which has already been done by others. But it seemed to me that the outline must be clearly drawn before the amazing varieties of expres- sion could be understood. Bewildering as they were in any particular matter, they all had reference to certain central conceptions. It is these which I tried to discover and exhibit. M. LONDON. February y 1899. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAGE The Youth of Elizabeth i CHAPTER n. Problems of the Reign „ 44 CHAPTER III. Elizabeth and Mary Stuart 91 CHAPTER IV. The Excommunication of Elizabeth „ ... 124 CHAPTER V. The ALEN90N Marriage „ ... 164 CHAPTER VI. The Crisis .. 204 CHAPTER VII. The New England , 238 CHAPTER VIII. Last Years of Elizabeth ►. .^ ... 281 QUEEN ELIZABETH CHAPTER I THE YOUTH OF ELIZABE' The Princess Elizabeth of England was born at Greenwich, between three and four of the afternoon of September 7, 1533. Her birth was a matter of small rejoicing to her parents, who were sorely disappointed that their first-born was not a boy. Seldom had greater issues depended on the sex of a child than were now at stake. Henry VHI. pined for a male heir to succeed to the English throne. He had wearied of his Spanish wife, Catherine ; he had made the hand of his sole daughter, Mary, the bait of many an alliance, which had come to nought. He had wasted England's resources on foreign wars, which had brought no return. He had found Catherine, with her devotion to Spain and her nephew, Charles V., an obstacle to his political plans, and had wearied of her person. He had lost his heart to Anne Boleyn, and determined to make her Queen at i QUEEN ELIZABETH. all costs. For this purpose he had waded deeply in the mire, had broken through all the conventions of propriety, had quarrelled with Pope and Emperor, and had filled Europe with his clamorous assertions of the right of a King of England to have his own way in matters matrimonial. When he failed of immediate success, he had set on foot a revolutionary change in England itself, the end of which he could not foresee. He had stubbornly declared his inten- tion to be divorced from Catherine and to marry Anne; he was bent on discovering some means_of^ * effecting his object. The death of Archbishop Warham in August, 1532, opened up a way. Warham had refused to con- sider the question of granting a divorce in England ; but Henry might secure a successor to Warham who would be amenable to his wishes. So sure was Henry of this result that on September i he created Anne Marchioness of Pembroke, and presented her with jewels taken from the Queen. This was re- garded as an announcement that Anne had consented to become the King's mistress, which was probably the fact. Pope Clement VII. thought that such an arrangement would end the question of the King's divorce, and accepted the royal nomination of Thomas Cranmer as Archbishop of Canterbury in Warham's stead. But before the bulls for his confirmation had arrived, Anne was with child, and it was necessary TtiE Youth op Elizabeth. 3 for her offspring to be born in lawful wedlock. She was privately married to Henry sometime in January, 1 533- Cranmer was consecrated Archbishop on March 30. On May 10, he opened his court to in- quire into the validity of the King's marriage with Catherine. Before the end of the month he pro- nounced the marriage with Catherine to have been null and void from the beginning, and the marriage with Anne to be good and valid. On June i, Anne was crowned in Westminster. These were not creditable proceedings to submit to the judgment of the English people. They were not attached to Catherine, and they ardently wished for a male successor to the throne. They had not sympathised with the King's foreign policy, and they longed to be free from its complications, and manage their national concerns in peace. They had no love for the Pope, and wished priests and monks to be reduced to their due place in the new society which was slowly coming into existence. They were desirous of more common-sense and simplicity in religious matters, and had little sympathy with the old-fashioned pretentiousness of the Churchmen. They were quite willing that the King should manage his personal matters as he thought best, provided he left them in peace. But still, when all had been done and settled, they shook their heads, and felt that there had been at work an amount of 4 Q UEEN BUZ A BETH. trickery and injustice which they could not approve. They were not critics of the King's proceedings, and they were ready to wait ; but their sympathy was more with the degraded Queen than with her upstart and brazen successor. The birth of a male heir to the throne would have gone far to reconcile them with what had been done. It would have satisfied the general desire that there should be no difficulties about the succession, that England should not have to face domestic discord and foreign intrigue. But another girl was a hindrance rather than a help to future prospects. If the choice was to lie between her and Mary, the claims of Mary would stand higher. yp^ '^^'''' fP^ So the birth of Elizabeth was a disappointment to her parents, and was the beginning of a cooling of Henry's affections towards the wife whom he had braved so much to gain. There was not much heartiness in the rejoicings which announced her coming into the world, or in the magnificence which attended her baptism on September lo, when her godparents were Archbishop Cranmer, the Dowager- Duchess of Norfolk, and the Dowager- Marchioness of Dorset. Three months after this a separate establishment was assigned to the child at Hatfield, where she was joined by her unfortunate sister Mary. The child saw little of her mother. Once only do we find her mentioned at Court. It was on THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 5 January g, 1536, when the news of the death of Queen Catherine had just arrived. Henry appeared dressed all in yellow, save for a white plume in his cap. After dinner he carried Elizabeth in his arms round the room, and showed her with triumph to the assembled courtiers. Anne joined in Henry's triumph, but her joy was of short duration. Henry was weary of Anne, and her failure to bear other children made her useless. So' long as Catherine lived he was bound to endure her vanity, her bad temper, and her want of tact and personal dignity. After Catherine's death he resolved to rid himself of her ; and Cromwell thought it better to ruin her entirely rather than divorce her on some technical plea. Anne was accused of repeated acts of adultery and incest, throughout all the period of her married life. She was found guilty and was executed on May 19, 1536. Two days before her death her marriage was declared invalid from the beginning, and Elizabeth was thus pronounced to be illegitimate. This was a tragic beginning of the life of one of the greatest of the rulers of England, and it is tempt- ing to consider the influence of heredity on Elizabeth's character. In her great qualities of caution and prudence she reverted to her grandfather, Henry Vn., while from her father she inherited the royal imperiousness and personal charm which always secured his popularity. To her mother she owed 6 QUEEN ELIZABETH. her vanity, her unscrupulousness, her relentless and overbearing temper. Anne Boleyn has been hardly judged. Indeed her position was impossible from the beginning; and none but a coarse, ambitious and self-seeking woman would have struggled so desperately as she did for a prize which was sure to be fatal. Her hardness and coarseness passed to her daughter, in whom they were modified by finer qualities, and were curbed by a sense of duty. But Elizabeth always remained more truly the daughter of Anne Boleyn than of Henry VHI., though she never took any steps to clear the character of her mother, whom indeed she was anxious to forget. The day after Anne's execution Henry married Jane Seymour, and Elizabeth was banished from her father's sight. She was committed to the care of Lady Bryan, a relative of her mother, and was assigned as a residence, Hunsdon House, in Hert- fordshire, pleasantly situated on a hill overlooking the Stort river. With her was her half-sister Mary, now twenty years of age, devoted to the memory of her mother, and vainly endeavouring to soften the inhumanity of the King. At first, Elizabeth was entirely neglected by her father. Lady Bryan was driven to write to Cromwell that the child was almost without clothes; she begged that provision should be made for her needs. Her remonstrance seems to have had some effect; THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 7 and she did her best to discharge her duty to the child intrusted to her care. Elizabeth was well brought up. She was taught to behave with de- corum. She learnt to sew, and at the age of six presented her brother Edward with a shirt of cambric of her own working. Edward was also committed to the charge of Lady Bryan, and for some time the two children were educated together. They were willing pupils, for the Tudors were fond of learning. They rose early and devoted the first part of the day to religious instruction. Then they studied "lan- guages, or some of the liberal sciences, or moral learning collected out of such authors as did best conduce to the instruction of Princes". When Edward went to exercise in the open air, Eliza- beth, " in her private chamber, betook herself to her lute or viol, and, wearied with that, to practise her needle ". Their teachers were carefully chosen from the best scholars of the time. First came Richard Cox, who had been trained in Wolsey's new College at Oxford, and whom Elizabeth afterwards made Bishop of Ely, in remembrance of her Latin lessons. After Cox came the great Cambridge scholar. Sir John Cheke, who carried on their education in the Classics. With him was Roger Ascham, who did not disdain to teach them writing, and formed that bold handwriting which characterises them both, and was a product of 8 QUEEN ELIZABETH. a time when writing was still considered as a fine art. Besides them were learned masters in French and Italian, Elizabeth showed such proficiency in these languages that, at the age of eleven, she wrote an Italian letter to Queen Catherine Parr, and also sent a translation of a book of devotions, Le Miroir de I' Ante pecheresse, written by Margaret of Valois, sister of Francis I. While she was thus carefully educated in mind and body, Elizabeth had no education of her affec- tions. Her father seldom saw her and took no interest in her. She was separated from her brother Edward, and was settled by herself at Enfield. As soon as she could think for herself, she must have felt that she was surrounded by an atmosphere of suspicion, and was alone and friendless in the world. The death of Henry, in 1547, ^^^ '^ot remove this isolation. The young Edward was separated from his sisters ; and they were carefully kept apart. In fact, the accession of Edward VI. opened the way for deep laid political intrigues. The boy was sickly, and was not likely to come to years of discretion. It is true that Henry VIII. had, by his will, made tardy reparation to the daughters whom he had so deeply wronged, and recognised their right of suc- cession. But Henry's will was not of much value. The Council which he had provided was set aside by the influence of Edward's uncle, Edward Seymour, THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 9 who took the rank of Duke of Somerset and the title of Lord Protector. Others, however, were not likely to acquiesce in his supremacy ; and Mary and Elizabeth might be instruments in their hands. Elizabeth was committed to the care of the Queen- Dowager, Catherine Parr; but she had a house of her own and a retinue of a hundred and twenty attendants. Her governess was a relative by her mother's side, Catherine Ashley, a foolish and im- prudent woman, little capable of guiding the pre- cocious girl amid the dangers which beset her. Elizabeth was soon to learn the lessons of life in a way which indelibly impressed them upon her mind, We may pity a girl exposed to such temptations ; but we must admit that there was little intuitive modesty in a character which could not resist their grossness. The matrimonial proceedings of Henry VHI. had necessarily lowered the tone of morality amongst his courtiers. The coarse gossip which was pre- valent was degrading and removed all sense of restraint. The great social revolution through which England was passing gave scope to unlimited covet- ousness. Men vv^ere low-minded, sensual, self-seek- ing, hypocritical and unscrupulous. There was a feeling that they were sharing in a general scramble, and that he was cleverest who gained most. There was little sense of honour, or gf family affection. lO QUEEN ELIZABETH, The fact that Somerset had won the first place was resented by his brother Thomas, Lord Seymour of Sudeley, who was made Lord High Admiral. His first plan was to marry Elizabeth ; but this required the consent of the King and Council, and he knew that their consent would not be given. He then approached the Queen-Dowager, whose lover he had been before her marriage with Henry VHL, and secretly married her within a few months after Henry's death. The marriage was reluctantly sanctioned in June, 1547. Lord Seymour was now brought nearer to the young King, and had the guardianship of Elizabeth. He was a tall, handsome man ; and Catherine was devoted to him. At first, she thought no harm of the familiarity with which he began to treat the young girl who was now thrown in his way. But it soon became evident, even to her, that Seymour was making love to Elizabeth in a corrupting way, and that Elizabeth showed no displeasure at his revolting attentions. Catherine Ashley was an accomplice, discussed with Elizabeth the attentions of her admirer, and connived at water-parties by night on the Thames. Thmgs went so far that, at last, the Queen-Dowager could endure Elizabeth's presence no longer, but dismissed her from her house in May, 1548. This was done without any open scandal ; the cause was kept a profound secret. Elizabeth was ests^blished s^t Cheshunt, and friendly THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. II correspondence continued between her and her former friends. Everything was done to repair past indiscretion and let it sink into oblivion. Catherine, however, was deeply wounded and could not forget. On August 30 she bore a daughter, and died a week afterwards. On her deathbed, she said sadly : " Those that be about me care not for me, but stand laughing at my grief; and the more good I will to them the less good they will to me". Seymour answered : " Why, sweetheart, I could you no hurt ". The dying woman said aloud: '* No, my Lord, I think so;" then she added in a whisper, *' but, my Lord, you have given me many shrewd taunts ". Seymour, however, felt no remorse for his treatment of a wife who bequeathed him all that she possessed. Scarcely was she buried before he resumed his intrigues for gaining power by a new combination. He had bought from her father the wardship of the Lady Jane Grey, whom he kept in his house and designed to marry to the young King, while he himself married Elizabeth. He opened communications through Catherine Ashley, who told Elizabeth that Seymour, who would fain have married her before he married the Queen, would soon come to woo. Elizabeth was certainly pleased at the pro- spect, and encouraged the proposal. But Seymour, ambitious as he was, could not conceal his projects, la QUEEN ELIZABETH. and Somerset was resolved to rid himself of his audacious brother. In January, 1549, Lord Seymour was arrested on a charge of high treason. Eliza- beth's governess, Catherine Ashley, and her steward, Thomas Parry, were carried away and imprisoned in the Tower. Elizabeth herself was confined to her house at Hatfield, under the guardianship of Sir Robert Tyrwhit, who was charged by the Council to examine her and discover evidence against Seymour. It was a terrible position for a young girl who was not yet sixteen. Deprived of her only friends, not knowing what they might reveal, left alone to the mercy of an astute official, whose duty it was to examine her from day to day, and make her admit her guilt, she well might quail. Her honour, even her life, was at stake. She was at the mercy of her servants. She had not the unconsciousness of absolute innocence ; and could only confide in the fidelity of her imprisoned attendants and in her own dexterity. At first, she burst into a flood of tears, and Tyrwhit thought that his task would be easy. He advised her to confess everything ; the evil and shame would be ascribed to Catherine Ashley ; she would be forgiven on the score of her youth. But Elizabeth soon regained her self-command in the face of danger. He could get nothing from her: " and yet," he writes, " I can see from her face that she is guilty, but she wUl abide more storms before THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. I3 she accuse Mrs. Ashley". The next day he suc- ceeded no better, and could only repeat, ** I do assure your Grace she hath a very good wit, and nothing is gotten of her but by great policy ". Elizabeth would not commit herself, and in a week's time felt suffi- ciently secure of the reticence of her servants to write in a dignified strain to the Protector, defending her reputation and protesting her innocence. " My conscience," she wrote, *' beareth me witness, which I would not for all earthly things offend in anything, for I know I have a soul to save, as well as other folks have, wherefore I will above all things have respect unto this same." As nothing could be discovered from Elizabeth, Tyrwhit turned his attention to her imprisoned steward. Parry, and extracted from him an account of the unseemly familiarities between his mistress and Lord Seymour. Catherine Ashley could not deny her knowledge of them, and furnished a few more particulars. Then Tyrwhit returned to Eliza- beth and put the two confessions into her hand. She read them abashed and breathless. But when Tyrwhit told her that Catherine Ashley would say nothing till she was confronted with Parry, the Tudor rage broke forth. '' False wretch," she cried, *' he promised not to confess to death ; how could he make such a promise and break it ? " Yet, downcast as she was at reading the record of her indiscretion, t4 QUEEN ELIZABETH. she soon recovered her presence of mind. She saw that on the main points her servants had stood firm. They sacrificed Elizabeth's private character to maintain her poHtical innocence. She had been a shameless flirt, but had never contemplated marry- ing Seymour without the consent of the Council. Elizabeth took her cue accordingly. Tyrwhit could extract nothing from her except scraps of foolish conversation about the possibility of such a marriage, in answer to which suggestions she always reserved the Council's assent. " They all sing the same song," said Tyrwhit wearily, '* and so I think they would not do unless they had got the note before." After all his efforts, the girl of sixteen baffled the experienced man of affairs. The Council proceeded against Seymour on other grounds, but administered a rebuke to Elizabeth in a letter which informed her : *' Catherine Ashley, who hithertofore hath had the special charge to see to the good education and government of your person, hath shown herself far unmeet to occupy any such place longer about your Grace. Being informed that she hath not shewed herself so much attendant to her office in this past as we looked for at her hands, we have thought good somewhat to say roundly to her in that behalf." Elizabeth was informed that Lady Tyrwhit had been appointed in Catherine Ashley's stead, and was recommended \, THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 15 to follow her good advice. At first, Elizabeth was furious. She would have no mistress save Catherine Ashley; she had not behaved so as to deserve the change. She wept all night, and sulked all the following day. Her mood was changed by a letter from the Protector, which told her that Seymour's household was broken up, and enabled her to see that his ruin was imminent. Then Elizabeth's spirit began to droop, though she vigorously de- fended Seymour if anything was said against him. She wrote to the Protector, remonstrating at the removal of Catherine Ashley as likely to corroborate the rumours which were current about her conduct. She asked that these rumours might be contradicted by a proclamation. This last request was gratified. But one of the articles against Seymour was that he had " attempted and gone about to marry the King's Majesty's sister, the Lady Elizabeth, second inheritor in remainder to the Crown ". On March 20, 1549, Seymour's head fell on the scaffold. This was a crushing experience for a girl of sixteen. It was undoubtedly the great crisis of Elizabeth's life, and did more than anything else to form her chara.cter. She learned, and she never forgot the lesson, that it was dangerous to follow her inclinations and indulge her affections. She dearly loved Seymour, with the ardour of a passionate girl. She was on the brink of a secret marriage with m' 1 . C o i6 QUEEN ELIZABETH. him, though she knew his coarse character and had been witness of the unhappiness of his former wife. She had a strong feeling of attachment for Catherine Ashley, and had trusted to her discretion. She learned the limitations of human trustworthi- ness, the inevitableness of personal responsibility. All this was an unwelcome revelation of life and its issues to herself. She must trust in herself and in herself only. Rigorous self-repression and self- restraint could alone enable her to stand securely. Love, trust, confidence were all beset with dangers. In the quietness which followed this period of trial she thought out the meaning of what she had endured. She had loved, and her lover had perished. She could ask herself what that love had meant to her. Was it more than a temporary stirring of the senses ? Was it worth the risk which she had run, the im- prudence which she had committed ? What would have been her future had she married Seymour? Was he capable of loving her in return, or was she merely a puppet in his hands, a piece in his game of political self-seeking? She must have re- called his treatment of the Queen- Dowager, whose tears she had seen flow, whose dying words of dis- appointment had been repeated to her. At the time, secure in her own youthful charms, she had thought disdainfully of the middle-aged queen. If she had become Seymour's wife, would she have been any the THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 17 happier ? Would not she too have been abandoned when her usefulness was past ? She had seen the Lady Jane Grey, an inmate of Seymour's house, another girl whose hand was of value for an intriguer to dispose of. What place had love in such matters as these ? It was possible for a village maiden : it was an impossible luxury for one who had a shred of claim to the throne of England. ^ We know how thoroughly Elizabeth understood these truths and acted upon them later. Her success in so doing was due to the severe teaching of ex- perience. When she recovered from the shock of Seymour's death and could look around her, she saw that it was necessary to recover her character and restore her reputation. No one could be better fitted to help her than Lady Tyrwhit, who was a wise, sympathetic and pious woman. She had formed one of the household of the Queen-Dowager, knew what Elizabeth had gone through, and could talk to her freely about the past. Under her care Elizabeth once more lived a quiet and studious life, principally at Hatfield. Ascham was summoned to be her tutor and was astonished at the rapidity of her progress. When she had just entered her seventeenth year she could speak French and Italian as well as English ; Latin with ease, Greek moderately. But her taste for literature was genuine : she appreciated nice distinctions in the use of words, and was a i8 QUEEN ELIZABETH. severe critic of style. She read with Ascham nearly the whole of Cicero and Livy, Sophocles, and several orations of Isocrates, besides the Greek Testament, the writings of St. Cyprian and the Commonplaces of Melanchthon. She was fond of music, but did not devote much time to it, nor to dress, in which she loved simplicity. Her literary tastes were enduring; her love of simplicity soon passed away. Indeed, it was never real, and Ascham's mention of it shows that Eliza- beth was acting a part. She had been detected as a shameless coquette ; she adopted the attitude of a modest and pious maiden. It was the wisest thing which she could do ; for the times were stormy, and their signs were hard to read. Before the end of 1550 the Protector's power had fallen before the superior craft of John Dudley, Earl of Warwick. Warwick's plans were deeper than those of Somerset, and required greater preparation. As the first step towards a distinctive policy, Warwick allied himself with the more advanced reformers in religion, and demanded strict uniformity of religious practice. This entirely accorded with the views of the young King. But there was one who could not be induced to swerve from her former habit, the Princess Mary ; and all efforts to subdue her obstinacy were in vain. It was at this time that Elizabeth was summoned to Court (March, 1551) to act as a foil to the recalcitrant THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 19 Mary. Elizabeth appeared with studious simpHcity and Edward welcomed her as " his dear and sweet sister, Temperance ". Elizabeth had achieved her end. She had established her character. Her ** maidenly apparel," we are told, " made the noble- men's wives and daughters ashamed to be dressed and painted like peacocks ". She was in a fair way to become the idol of the reforming party. She returned to Hatfield well satisfied with her position, which she maintained with quiet splendour. Her household accounts for the year from October, 1551, to October, 1552, have been preserved and give us an insight into her daily life. Her income was nearly ;f6ooo a year, equivalent to ^^30,000 of our money. Her expenditure was mostly spent in maintaining her establishment and dispensing hospit- ality. Her kitchen account was ;f 500, besides ^^312 for poultry ; her bakehouse cost ;;f2i2 ; wax candles and spices amounted to ;f 340 ; wages to £^26 ; and wine and beer to ^^306. She spent little on her dress, less on her books ; and her alms only reached the moderate sum of £7 17s. She made some profit by selling things to the royal household. The accounts themselves were submitted to her and she signed as auditor at the bottom of several pages. It is clear that she was a prudent and thrifty manager, and at the end of the year had a balance in her favour of £^1500, She early developed that financial 20 QUEEN ELIZABETH. carefulness which was not the smallest element in her subsequent success. New perils, however, were gathering round her. Edward VI. was visibly dying ; and the schemes of Warwick, who had been created Duke of Northum- berland, began to take shape. He worked, upon the King's earnest desire, for the establishment of Protestantism in England and for its future mainten- ance. To this primary object all else must give way. If Henry VIII. could dispose of the succession by his will, so could his son. It was not fitting that Henry's daughters should succeed their brother. Mary was a favourer of the old religion. She could be set aside on the ground of illegitimacy, and the same plea must include Elizabeth also. The line of Henry's elder sister, Margaret of Scotland, was to be passed over for that of the younger sister Mary, and the crown conferred on the Lady Jane Grey, who was married to a son of Northumberland. To clear the ground for this arrangement a marriage had been proposed between Elizabeth and the King of Denmark. The proposal came to nothing. When Edward VI. died, July 6, 1553, all was ready for the proclamation of the Lady Jane, and the im- prisonment and death of Mary and Elizabeth. Mary was the more important, and must be secured at once. Northumberland hid the fact of the King's death, and invited Mary to her brother's THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. ai deathbed. But Mary was informed of the truth, while on her way, and took refuge in Norfolk. It was necessary for Northumberland to go in pursuit of her, a comparatively easy matter. But Northum- berland had not counted on Mary's resoluteness, and on the objection of the English people to revolu- tions. Mary summoned the people to her side as their lawful Queen, and they answered her call. The victory of Northumberland, they saw, would mean a long period of disquiet, and insecurity of life an3 property. Town after town declared in Mary's favour, and before Northumberland could reach her she was guarded by an army of 40,000 men. The scheme to dispossess her completely failed. Elizabeth, meanwhile, remained quietly at Hat- field, whence she wrote to congratulate Mary on her accession. She came to London to greet the Queen on her entrance, August 3, 1553. Mary received her graciously and gave her the chief place after herself, though she must have known that the graceful figure and youthful vivacity of Elizabeth threw into the shade her own careworn face, grown old before its time. Doubtless, Mary wished to do her duty by her sister ; but each must have felt that there was a gulf of separation between the daughter of Catherine and the daughter of Anne Boleyn. The one passionately desired to wipe away all that happened since the days when Catherine stood by the side of Henry, his JS2 QUEEN ELIZABETH. undoubted wife. The other must have marvelled sometimes at the thoughts of all that had occurred to call her into being ; she must have felt that she embodied in herself the principles of a mighty revolu- tion. This difference between the two sisters was inevitable. It showed itself at once, when Mary did not attend the funeral of Edward, but was present at a Requiem Mass in the chapel of the Tower. She invited Elizabeth to accompany her, but Elizabeth fleclined. Mary would not brook resistance to her will. Either Elizabeth must conform to her religious practices, or else must leave the Court. Elizabeth's position was difficult. She had been brought up in the religious ideas which prevailed in directing the policy of Henry VIII., the acceptance of the results of the New Learning, and the reform of the Church in accordance with a fuller understand- ing of the Scriptures and of Christian antiquity. She had no sympathy with the more advanced views of Continental Protestantism, which had been favoured by Northumberland for the purpose of forming a party in England which depended on himself. That party had fallen, and Mary was bent upon using her victory to restore the old Church. How far that was possible remained to be seen. This, at all events, was certain, that the Church could never again be what it had been in the days of Wolsey. Its exact form remained to be determined. Mary's personal THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. / . «? opinions could not be impressed upon the English people all at once. For this reason she was anxious that they should be adopted by those immediately around her ; and, first of all, by Elizabeth. Elizabeth felt that, if she was entirely obstinate, she would seem to identify herself with the Protestant party, which, though fallen for a time, was sure to raise its head. If she did so, she would expose herself to suspicion, and would be regarded as a source of political danger i to Mary. She knew that already the foreign ambaft- | sadors advised Mary to remove from her path one / who was her natural rival. Whatever else might / happen, Elizabeth had no wish to appear as the / champion of the party of Northumberland. Accord-/ ingly she determined to maintain her own religious! position as nearly as she could in the circumstances.! To refuse obstinately to go to Mass would be to! declare herself a Protestant in the political sense. To go to Mass without a protest would be to declare herself an adherent of the Pope. To go to Mass with marked unwillingness, in obedience to the Queen's wishes, was to declare herself of the same mind as the great majority of the English people, resolute in her adhesion to the principles of what had beenVdone in reforming the English Church, but uncertain un3er what forms this could best be maintained. She pro- fessed herself ready to surrender her own prejudices and went to Mass with the Queen on September 8, 24 QUEEN ELIZABETH. with a downcast- look, complaining of illness on the way. After this concession on her part she was given the first place after the Queen at the ceremony of the Coronation on October i. Elizabeth knew the value of this public recognition, and felt that for the present she had done all that could be done. She saw that, amid the intrigues which gathered round Mary, her own position in the court was dangerous. She had the wisdom to withdraw in time. After several requests, she obtained permission to de- part and set out for her house of Ashridge, on December 6. No sooner had she arrived than she wrote to Mary for ornaments for her chapel. She knew Mary's weak side. She chose to represent herself as one who was seeking her way back to the true Church. Few women have been more unhappy than Mary Tudor. She came to the throne with a mind em- bittered by the sense of past wrongs, with no friend whom she could trust, and no counsellor strong enough to advise her. She was strangely isolated from the actual politics of England. How was she to be attached to them ? Her advisers were agreed that she must marry, and doubtless hoped to manage the Queen through her husband. There was a candidate ready at hand, Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon, who had been imprisoned in the Tower or the last fourteen years through Henry VHI.'s THE YOUTH OP ELIZABETH. 25 jealousy of any pretender to the Cro^n. Courtenay's grandmother was a daughter of Edward IV., and he represented the White Rose. For this cause his father had been beheaded ; his mother and him- self, a boy of twelve, confined within the Tower, whence Mary had released him. His birth, his sad story, his handsome face, and his accomplishments made him popular; and there was a general desire that he should marry the Queen. Had Courtenay been a wiser man, the course of affairs might have been different. But, on his release, he plunged into every kind of folly and excess. Mary had no liking for such a husband. Her eyes were already turned elsewhere. She was devoted to her cousin, the Emperor Charles V., who had always appeared to her as the chivalrous defender of her luckless mother. In the long hours of her solitude she had nourished a fantastic reverence for him. She longed to be allied to her mother's house. On his side, Charles V. cherished a dream of universal monarchy, towards which a close hold on England would greatly help. So Charles, through his ambassadors in England, became the director of Mary's policy and cautiously prepared the way for her marriage with his son Philip. But no caution could overcome the repug- nance of the English people to this invitation of a foreigner to mix in English affairs. It was in vain to represent to Mary the dangers which she ran. 26 QUEEN ELIZABETH. " Rather death," she said, " fhan marriage with any one save the Prince of Spain." English patriotism was severely shocked at this prospect, and all who had any motive for disliking Mary's policy combined against her. Behind the English rebels stood France, which was alarmed at the accession of power to its rival, Spain. Early in 1554, a rebellion against Mary broke out in various parts of England. It was easily put down in Devon- shire and in the Midlands, but in Kent Sir Thomas Wyatt repulsed the Royal forces and advanced against London. Mary was lost if she did not assure the fidelity of the citizens. But Mary had no doubt of the justice of her cause and showed no fear. She summoned the citizens to the Guildhall and there addressed them in her deep man's voice, with dignified eloquence. The city was won for the throne. Wyatt's attack failed, and he was made prisoner on February 7. It was obvious that this insurrection was in favour of Elizabeth. Her name and Courtenay's had been on the lips of the rebels. A copy of a letter from her to the Queen was found in an intercepted dis- patch of the French ambassador; Wyatt had sent her a message to withdraw from Ashridge to Dun- nington. Elizabeth's conduct was that of one who waited to see the issue. Mary wrote to her on Janu- ary 26, expressing fears for her safety and summoning THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 27 her to London. Elizabeth answered that she was too ill to travel, and asked her to send one of her own physicians. She kept her bed and fortified her house at Ashridge against a surprise. On receiving this answer, Mary was too busy in defending herself to think much of her sister; but when the danger was over, the imperial ambassador pressed for vengeance. It was his interest to remove every one who might be an obstacle in the way of the Emperor's plan of attaching England to the Spanish monarchy. So long as Elizabeth lived she was a source of danger, and this was a good opportunity for silencing her for ever. Mary, however, was averse to bloodshed. The luckless Lady Jane Grey paid the penalty of her unworthy father's treason ; but Elizabeth could not safely be condemned unless there was clear evidence against her. Mary showed her intention to proceed with strict regard for justice by sending an escort to bring Elizabeth to London, and placing at its head her great uncle, Lord William Howard. Howard was aware of the importance of gaining time, and due regard was paid to Elizabeth's illness. Leaving Ashridge on February 12, she travelled only six or seven miles a day, and did not reach Highgate till the 15th. There she lay ill of the dropsy, her limbs so swollen that she could go no further. She did not enter London till the 22nd ; 28 QUEEN ELIZABETH. seated in an open litter, dressed in white, with pale and haughty face, she was carried to Whitehall. apiid the respectful silence of the crowd. The rebel leaders confessed that their' plan had been to place Elizabeth and Courtenay on the throne. Courtenay knew of their intention ; it was not certain that Elizabeth did. Strong as were the suspicions against her, nothing could be definitely proved. Moreover, the Council was divided in opinion. Ijjfany members, chief amongst whom was Gardiner,^>yvere still opposed to the Spanish marriage, and would not do anything that could help it on. Still, Eliza- beth's enemies so far prevailed that on March ig she was committed to the Tower. When this order was brought to Elizabeth she asked permission to write to the Queen. This was given, and sitting down, she wrote a letter of rugged eloquence and force. She protested her innocence, and begged for a personal interview before she was condemned to imprisonment. " You shall never by report know," she continued, ** unless by yourself you hear. I have heard in my time of many cast away for want of coming to the presence of the Prince. And in late days, I heard my Lord of Somerset say, that if his brother had been suffered to speak with him, he had never suffered. But the persuasions were made to him so great that he was brought to believe that he could not live safely if the Admiral lived ; and that THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 29 made him consent to his death. Though these persons are not to be compared to your Majesty, yet I pray God that evil persuasions persuade not one sister against the other; and all for that they have heard false report and not hearken to the truth knowing. Therefore once again, kneeling with humbleness of heart, because I am not suffered to bow the knees of my body, I humbly crave to speak with your Highness : which I could not be so bold to desire if I knew not myself most clear as I know myself most true. And, as for the traitor Wyatt, he might peradventure write me a letter; but, on my faith, I never received any from him. And as for the copy of my letter sent to the French King, I pray God confound me eternally, if ever I sent him word, message, token or letter by any means. And to this truth, I will stand to the death." No answer was sent to this letter, and Mary re- buked her officers for not punctually doing their duty. Next day, it was Palm Sunday, Elizabeth was taken in a barge to the Tower. At first she refused to alight at the Traitor's Gate, saying she was no traitor. " There is no choice," said one of the Lords, at the same time offering her his cloak as a protection from the rain. She " put it back with a good dash," and setting her foot upon the stair, said : ** Here landeth as true a subject, being prisoner, as ever landed at these stairs, and before Thee, O God, 30 QUEEN ELIZABETH. I Speak it, having none other friend but Thee alone ". There was no doubt about Elizabeth's courage and presence of mind. Her letter was written in her usual handwriting, and shows no sign of haste. Its characters are bold; no flourish is omitted in the signature. Not only was Elizabeth brave, but she was careful to show her bravery. For two months she remained a close prisoner in the Tower, while her fate was a matter of daily debate. Wyatt was executed, without having said anything which incriminated her. At last, through weariness, it was agreed that her life should be spared. But she was undoubtedly dangerous, as a centre of intrigues ; and it was impossible to think that she would not give them encouragement. It would be unwise to release her to live in her own house ; so the royal manor of Woodstock was chosen as a place where she could be closely guarded. She was committed to the charge of Sir Henry Beding- field, whose father had been the guardian of Queen Catherine during her imprisonment at Kimbolton. She left London on May 19, and in five days reached Woodstock, where she had scanty accommodation assigned her in the gatehouse. Bedingfield was provided with strict orders by the Council and was over-weighted by the sense of his responsibility. After her accession, Elizabeth said to him : " If we have any prisoner whom we would have sharply and THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 31 straitly kept, we will send for you ". Yet she bore him no ill-will, and recognised that he only obeyed orders. Indeed she must have felt that she was a troublesome captive and often tried him to the utmost. At first, she had neither books, nor pen and ink. When one of her attendants sent her a copy of Cicero's De Officiis and the Psalms in Latin, he was reproved by Bedingfield, who felt it his duty to con- sult the Council before permitting the use of books. When leave was given, Elizabeth asked for an English Bible, which seemed to savour heresy, as she could read Latin equally well. This new question was referred to the Council, and Elizabeth slipped in a request that she might be permitted to write to the Queen. This was granted, and Elizabeth wrote a fervent protestation of her innocence. Mary an- swered to Bedingfield that she had no confidence in her protestations, and ended, " wherefore our pleasure is not to be hereafter any more molested with such disguise and colourable letters ". Mary, at least, had made up her mind about Elizabeth's character, and Bedingfield found some difficulty in reducing his message to terms of decent courtesy. Elizabeth was left to her solitary reflections, ill-supplied with books or occupation, restricted in her walks in Woodstock Park, and always under the eye of Bedingfield, who reported to the Council her 32 QUEEN ELIZABETH, outbursts of temper as she chafed under this intoler- able restraint. She envied the milk-maids, whose song she heard ih the distance, and longed to exchange her life for theirs. She wrote in charcoal on a shutter the following lines expressing her feelings of despair: — 1 Oh Fortune, how thy restless wavering state Hath wrought with cares my troubled wit, ,; ,,;,; , Witness this present prison, whither fate jK^ 1 **^ J* ^ Could bear me, and the joys I quit. Af A?^' *r^°" caus'dst the guilty to be loosed T' >^b^ \i\S» From bands wherein are innocents enclosed, r ^ V^ Causing the guiltless to be strait reserved .sfliV And freeing those that death had well deserved s; ^*^ But by her envy can be nothing wrought : V So God send to my foes all they have wrought. Y <^. Quoth Elizabeth, Prisoner. Elizabeth owed her deliverance from captivity to the influence of Philip. When Mary's marriage had been accomplished, and the supremacy of the Pope had been restored, above all, when Mary was supposed to be with child, there was no longer the same need for strict caution. Philip was anxious to win the goodwill of the English people. He brought with him ideas founded on a general view of European ' politics, and could afford to wait for ultimate success. He tried to moderate the excessive zeal of Mary for the re-establishment of the old ecclesiastical system. He did not wish that Elizabeth should seem to be a THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 33 victim to the Spanish alliance. His notion was to dispose of her in marriage to some foreign prince, and so remove her from England to some place where she would be under careful supervision. The Duke of Savoy seemed a suitable husband. He had come to England in Philip's train and was dependent upon imperial protection. But before this marriage could be settled, the Duke was called to the defence of his dominions. However, if Elizabeth was to be married, she could not be kept a prisoner ; and at the end of April, 1555, Bedingfield was ordered to bring her to Hampton Court. On leaving Woodstock, Elizabeth scratched with a diamond on a glass window the following lines, which express exactly her position : — Much suspected by me : Nothing proved can be, Quoth Elizabeth, prisoner. She was perhaps more frank in writing them than she intended to be. She does not deny the truth of the suspicions : the emphasis falls on the absence of proof; she rejoices in her dexterity. After all that she had gone through there was nothing definite against her. She had improved on her previous experience and could leave her prison, with her head erect. This was not in accordance with Mary's views of the justice of the case. She believed that her sister had been disloyal ; she knew that she had been adroit. 3 34 QUEEN ELIZABETH, She found it necessary to restore her to some sem- blance of favour, but she wished to do so as a matter of grace after due submission. Accordingly Elizabeth was left for a fortnight in solitude at Hampton Court, that she might feel the necessity, of preferring some petition. At the end of that time she had a visit from the Chancellor, Gardiner, who requested her to make submission to the Queen, who, he had no doubt, would be good to her. Elizabeth stood to her position that nothing could be proved against her. She answered boldly that she would rather lie in prison all the days of her life ; she craved no mercy, but desired the law if she had offended. The next day Gardiner returned with a message that the Queen marvelled at her stubbornness : if she did not confess that she had oifended, the Queen would seem to have imprisoned her wrongfully. *' Nay," said Elizabeth, " it may please her to punish me as she thinketh good." " Well," answered Gardiner, " you must tell another tale before you are set at liberty." Again Elizabeth boldly declared that she would rather be in prison, with honesty and truth, than to be free and suspected by the Queen. Gardiner pointed out the result of this attitude : *' Then your Grace hath the vantage of me, and the other lords, for your wrong and long imprisonment ". Elizabeth affected to mis- understand the argument : " What vantage I have, you know, taking God to record I seek no vantage THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 35 at your hands for your so dealing with me : but God forgive me and you also". Gardiner retired com- pletely baffled. Elizabeth was left in solitude for a week to consider her position. Then she received a message, at ten o'clock at night, to come before the Queen. The suddenness of the summons and the lateness of the hour foretold some new disaster, and Elizabeth parted from her household, commending herself to their prayers as one who would never see them again. Sir Henry Bedingfield led her through the garden by torchlight and she was ushered into the Queen's bedroom, where Mary was seated in a chair, with all the appearance of a judge. Elizabeth knelt before her, and prayed God to preserve her, as became a true subject ; she besought the Queen to regard her as such, whatever reports she might have heard against her. " You will not confess your offence," said Mary, " but stand stoutly in your truth ; I pray God it may so fall out." '' If it doth not," was Elizabeth's bold answer, " I request neither favour nor pardon at your Majesty's hands." " Well," said the Queen, *'you stiffly still persevere in your truth. Belike you will not confess but that you have been wrongfully punished." " I must not say so, if it please your Majesty, to you." " Why, then, belike you will to others." "No," replied Elizabeth; "I have borne the burden and must bear it. I humbly beseech your Majesty to have a good opinion of me, 36 QUEEN ELIZABETH, and to think me to be your true subject, not only from the beginning hitherto, but for ever as long as life lasteth." Mary was softened. Indeed Elizabeth at this time was recognised by her enemies as having "a spirit full of incantation ". Mary felt the charm of this bold, yet winsome, girl, and spoke comfortably to her. " God knows," she said in Spanish, with a sigh, as Elizabeth departed. A few days afterwards, Bedingfield and his soldiers were withdrawn. Elizabeth was no longer in custody, but stayed quietly at Hampton Court. It was just at this time that Maiy was passing through the bitter experience of her self-deception about her pregnancy. She had mistaken for the promise of a child the signs of an incurable malady, the dropsy. She continued to hope against hope, but felt that those around her did not share her delusions. • \ Elizabeth was the next heir to the throne. If she iwere set aside, the succession would be Mary of / Scotland, whose French marriage made her more dangerous to Philip th^n was Elizabeth. So Philip V was kijidly towards her; and Mary only longed for certainty about her religious convictions. She had ' little confidence in Elizabeth's conversion to Ro- manism and plied her with questions. It was in answer to such a question about transubstantiation that Elizabeth is said to havfiL-^Y?" the famous answer : — THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 37 Christ was the word that spake it, He took the bread and brake it ; And what His words did make it That I believe and take it. It was a saying the theological truth of which has become more apparent as controversy on the point has progressed. For a time Elizabeth continued to live at the Court, but in October was allowed to return to her house at Hatfield, where she gathered round her her old friends, Catherine Ashley and Parry, and the rest. But England was unquiet ; and there were plots against Mary in which Elizabeth's household were perpetually compromised. In the middle of 1556 Sir Thomas Pope was appointed chief officer of her household, to keep a friendly watch over her doings. Again there were proposals for her marriage, first to Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy, then to Eric, son of the King of Sweden. Elizabeth refused them both, protesting that she loved the state in' which she was so much that she knew no life to be compared with it. She was learning a formula which_ afterwards stood in her good stead. She was always ready to contemplate matrimony as an ideal possi- bility, but always found some reason against any particular proposal. Marriage might be good, but not if it diminished her personal importance. Indeed, she was at this time most careful of her popularity, 38 QUEEN ELIZABETH. and tried to keep as large a household as she could. She lost no opportunity of appearing in pubHc, and steadily, but cautiously, asserted her position. We have a picture of Elizabeth at this time, drawn by the pen of a Venetian ambassador. It is of interest as showing how she struck an experienced observer, and already possessed all those qualities which she afterwards displayed. ** She is at present," wrote Giovanni Micheli, " of the age of twenty-three, and is esteemed to be no less fair in mind than she is in body. Albeit, in face she is pleasing rather than beautiful ; but her figure is tall and well pro- portioned. She has a good complexion, though of a somewhat olive tint, beautiful eyes, and above all a beautiful hand, which she likes to show. She is of admirable talent and intelligence, of which she has given proof by her behaviour in the dangers and sus- picions to which she has been exposed. She has great knowledge of languages, especially Italian, and for display talks nothing else with Italians. She is proud and haughty ; for in spite of her mother, she holds herself as high as the Queen and equally legiti- mate, alleging in her own behalf that her mother would not cohabit with the King save as his wife, and that with the authority of the Church, after sentence given by the Primate of this realm ; so that even if she were deceived having acted in good faith, she contracted a valid marriage and bore her THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH. 39 child in lawful wedlock. Even supposing she be a ^bastard, she bears herself proudly and boastfully through her father, whom she is said to resemble more than does the Queen. Moreover, in the late King's will, she was placed on the same footing as the Queen, and was named her successor, if she died without issue. She lives on what her father be- queathed her, and is always in debt ; she would be more so but that she keeps down her household not to awaken the Queen's jealousy. For there is no lord, nor knight in the kingdom, who would not enter her service, or send there his son or brother; such is the affection and love which is felt towards her. She is always pleading her poverty, in such a dexterous way as to awaken silent compassion and therefore greater affection. For every one thinks it hard that a King's daughter should be so miserably treated. Since Wyatt's rebellion she has never been free ; for though she is allowed to live in her house, some twelve miles distant from London, still she has many guards and spies about her, who observe all comers and goers ; and she never says or does any- thing that is not at once reported to the Queen. After the Queen's marriage she came to Court, and contrived to win the favour of the Spaniards, and especially of the King, with whom she is a great favourite. He has steadily opposed the Queen's desires to disinherit her by Act of Parliament, or declare her 40 QUEEN ELIZABETH. illegitimate, or send her out of the kingdom. If it were not for his influence and for the fear of an insurrection, the Queen would undoubtedly find some occasion for punishing her, if not for past, at least for present, offences; for there is no conspiracy in which, justly or unjustly, her name is not mentioned and some of her servants involved. But the Queen is obliged to dissemble her dislike, and constrain herself to receive her in public with kindness and honour." Mary's days, however, were drawing to a close. During the summer of 1558 she was ill, and in November it was plain that she was dying. Philip sent her a message advising her to recognise Eliza- beth as her successor. She did so, and sent Elizabeth her last request that she would pay her personal debts, and maintain religion on the basis which she had established. The Spanish envoy who brought Philip's message, the Count de Feria, tried to impress Elizabeth with proper gratitude towards his master. She answered proudly that she owed her safety to the people of England. Then they dis- cussed the future, and the experienced diplomatist saw that her preparations were already made. Her secretary would be Sir William Cecil, a man full of intelligence and capacity, but tainted with heresy. He saw that she would not commit herself to any one's protection, but would govern for herself. His report to his master was justified by actual facts. THE YOUTH OF P:rrz.4^Xc j/- --^.^ igi^ 4t " To great subtlety," he wrote, " she adds very great vanity. She has heard great talk of her father's mode of action, and means to follow it. I have great fear that she thinks ill in the matter of religion, for I see that she inclines to govern by men who are suspected as heretics." Elizabeth remained quietly at Hatfield, awaiting the news of Mary's death. She saw, day by day, new visitors arriving. Her plans were already made, and Cecil was ready to take all necessary steps when the moment came. On November 17 the news was brought of Mary's death ; but Elizabeth was too prudent to act in haste, and sent Sir Nicholas Throgmorton to ascertain if the news was true. Before his return, a deputation of the Lords of the Council arrived at Hatfield and greeted their new Queen. Elizabeth stood for a moment irresolute. Then falling on her knees, she exclaimed : '* This is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes ". Few rulers ever ascended a throne better pre- pared for her task than did Elizabeth. The facts of her personal experience had corresponded" with the experience of the nation. Her own lifehad^eery interwoven with the national life. She had been in imminent danger, both under Edward and unde|* Mary. She had suffered, and had learned as the nation learned and suffered. She had lived amongst perilsL and had been taught the need of prudence. Self^^ 4a QUEEN ELIZABETH. mastery and self-restraint had been forced upon her. Bitter experience had taught her how little she could satisfy her own desires, how little she could confide in the wisdom or discretion of others. She had spent long hours in enforced solitude and reflection as the drama of events passed before her. She had seen the failures of other lives, their disappointments, and their tragic end. And, in all this, she had been no idle spectator, but one whose own fortunes were deeply involved ; and at each new turn of events men's minds had been more closely directed to her, so that her personal importance had been emphasised. She seemed to form part of all that the nation had passed through. Now she was called upon to amend the melancholy results of the ill-directed zeal of others, to bring back England to peace and security. For all men's hopes were set upon her as " born mere English, here among us, and therefore most natural to us ". Men looked back to the days of Henry VIII., which loomed greater through the clouds of the past twelve years of misgovernment, to a time when at least there was an intelligible policy, and welcomed Elizabeth as the true inheritor of her father's spirit. Her training had been severe ; but to that severity was due the character and the qualities which enabled her to face the work which lay before her. She would not have had it other- wise, for it made her one with her people. THE YOUTH OF ELIZABETH, 43 It would seem that, in later days, she wished for a romantic expression in art of the trials and anxieties of her early days. A portrait of her, at Hampton Court, tries to depict in allegory, which it is difficult to unfold with exactness, Elizabeth before her accession. Standing in a forest, under a tree laden with fruit, a fair young girl looks out with eyes fixed on an unknown future. On her head she bears a high white cap of Persian form, whence falls a black veil. Her right hand is placing a crown of flowers upon the head of a stag, whose head is bowed, while tears drop from its eyes. The tree's trunk is covered with inscriptions which lament the injustice of human lot. On a shield is inscribed a poem, which gives us a clue to the meaning of the whole, and celebrates the trials of Elizabeth's youth. The restless swallow fits my restless mind In still reviving, still renewing, wrongs ; Her just complaints of cruelty unkind Are all the music that my life prolongs, With pensive thought my weeping stag I crown ; Whose melancholy tears my cares express ; His tears and silence, and my sighs unknown Are all the physic that my harms redress. My only hope was in this goodly tree, Which I did plant in love, bring up in care ; But all in vain, for now, too late, I see The shales be mine, the kernels others are. My music may be plaints, my physic tears If this be all the fruit my love-tree bears. 44 CHAPTER II. PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. While Elizabeth was exceptionally fitted ta occupy the post of ruler, few rulers ever had beforethein a more difficult and dangerous inheritance. England under Edward VI. had been the prey of self-seeking and unscrupulous adventurers ; under Mary ^it h ad been an appendage to the Spanish power. Its finances were embarrassed ; it was suffering from two bad harvests ; its navy was scarcely existent ; its military forces were disorganised ; its defences were crumbling ; it had no statesmen of mark ; its foreign relations were precarious. A contemporary memor- andum thus puts the melancholy condition of the country: ''The Queen poor; the realm exhausted; the nobles poor and decayed ; good captains and soldiers wanting ; the people out of order ; justice not executed; the justices unmeet for their offices; all things dear ; division among ourselves ; war with France and Scotland ; the French King bestriding the realm, having one foot in Calais and the other in Scotland ; steadfast enmity, but no steadfast friend- PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 45 ship abroad ". It was difficult to know where remedy was to begin, and it was impossible to choose. The only hope lay in usmg wisely the opportunities offered by a new reign. On one point of importance Elizabeth's mind was already made up. ^he had already selected her chief minister, and her wisdom was justified by the fidelity with which he served her for forty years. William Cecil was the son of a country gentleman who lived at Burghley, near Stamford. His father was in the service of Henry VH., and became more important under Henry VHL, when he enriched himself with the plunder of the monasteries. William was edu- cated at Cambridge, where he married the sister of his friend Cheke, whose mother was poor and kept a small wine-shop. This imprudent marriage is the only trace of romance in Cecil's life. He did not, however, suffer for it, as his wife died in three years, and he married again the most cultivated woman of the time, Mildred Cooke, whose sister was the mother of Francis Bacon. Cecil practised at the bar till the Protector Somerset made him his secretary, and he rapidly showed a capacity for affairs. But Cecil learned prudence, and was content with scanty recog- nition. Under Mary he and his wife conformed to Romanism, and he was still employed in politics. How Elizabeth learned his worth we do not know ; but he was preparing himself for her service and was 46 QUEEN ELIZABETH. ready at once to act in her behalf. When he took the oath as secretary, Elizabeth addressed him : " This judgment I have of you, that you will not be corrupted with any manner of gifts, and that you will be faithful to the State ; and that without respect of any private will, you will give me that counsel that you think best ; and if you shall know anything neces- sary to be declared unto me of secrecy, you shall show it to myself only, and assure yourself I will not fail to keep taciturnity therein ". It was a noble expression of confidence which was well requited through a long and laborious life. A little later, the great seal was taken from the Archbishop of York and given to Sir Nicholas Bacon, Cecil's brother-in-law. The administration was to be in the hands of men who would work together. Elizabeth's first appearance in public showed that she valued popularity above all things and spared no pains to gain it. " If ever any person had either the gift or the style to win the hearts of the people, it was this Queen ; and if ever she did express the same, it was at that present, in coupling mildness with majesty, as she did, and in stately stooping to the meanest sort. All her faculties were in motion, and every motion seemed a well-guided action. Her eye was set on one ; her ear listened to another ; her judgment ran upon a third ; to a fourth she addressed her speech ; her spirit seemed to be everywhere, and PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 47 yet SO entire in herself, as it seemed to be nowhere else. Some she pitied ; some she commended ; some she thanked ; at others she pleasantly and wittily jested, contemning no person, neglecting no office; and distributing her smiles, looks and graces so artificially that thereupon the people redoubled the testimony of their joys, and afterwards raising every- thing to the highest strain, filled the ears of all men with immoderate extolling their prince." In all the pageantry which ushers in a new reign, Elizabeth was busy in endearing herself to the hear^^f her people, she used every opportunity of showing herself in public, and she was affable to all. She laid from"^ the beginning the foundations of that personal popu- larity which she never lost, and which was her strongest weapon amid all her perils. Yet there were serious questions to be faced, which needed settlement ; and foremost among them was the question of religion. In nothing was the legacy of the last two reigns more disastrous, as they represented periods of reaction which had checked the natural development of the reforming pro- cess begun under Henry VIII. Henry had abolished the Papal jurisdiction and had suppressed the monas- teries, which no longer fulfilled any useful function. The system and services of the Church vftre simplified according to the requirements of th^ New Learning and the increased intelligence of th^eoplb ; and the / 4 8 QUEEN ELIZABETH. process thus begun was to go on slowly adjusting the old system to the national capacity. There were some minds which were imbued with the principles of the more thorough-going changes wrought on the Con- tinent ; and, under Edward VI., these principles were caught at by adventurers, chiefly to give them an opportunity for further pillage of ecclesiastical pro- perty. The result of their action was to alarm the moderate men, who had been the chief supporters and advisers of Henry VI I L They were driven back upon the old system, and welcomed Mary, who was a de- voted adherent to the Papacy. Under her, Gardiner strove to undo what he had done before ; and the zeal of those who with him tried to go back upon their past was fierce and indiscreet. England unwillingly accepted the Papal restoration and the Spanish alli- ance. Its rulers laboured to force all men into rigid uniformity and close the mouths of gainsayers. The fires of Smithfield filled England with horror ; and Mary's reign ended amid gloom and disaster. The revival of Romanism was associated with all that England felt to be most repressive of its energies. Elizabeth, a» the daughter of Anne Boleyn, was heir to the problems of the Reformation. Great as they might be, they were not so great or so dangerous as those connected with the maintenance of the old system. The object which Elizabeth had in view was, first PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 49 of all, to allay, as much as might be, the animosities which had been engendered in the previous time. Mary's bishops had been appointed from those who had suffered under Edward VI., and as a body were bound to maintain the Roman system. On the other hand, those divines who had most strongly expressed reforming opinions, fled before the Marian persecution, and lived on the Continent. They now returned home strong adherents of the system of Calvin and almost fanatically opposed to anything which savoured of Papacy. It was impossible to bring these two ex- tremes into agreement ; it was inevitable that some should be discontented. But the great bulk of the English people wished for a national Church, in- dependent of Rome, with simple services, not too unlike those to which they had been accustomed. It was important that the Pa^a^l jurisdiction should be definitely ended, and that, at the same time, the framework of the Church should be retained; pro- vided that these two objects were secured there should be large liberty for theological discussion. What was needed was a system which would supply an expression for the religious consciousness of the nation, and would allow of freedom within the limits of ecclesiastical order. After a time, it was hoped that transient animosities would cease and reason and moderation would prevail. As a first step towards carrying out this policy, a 4 50 QUEEN ELIZABETH. proclamation was issued forbidding mutual recrimi- nations, and ordering that no changes in public wor- ^ip should be made without authority^ Soon the Epistles and Gospels were allowed to be read in English as well as the Litany. Public preaching was prohibited lest men's minds should be inflamed by strong language. These steps were so significant that Archbishop Heath refused to crown a Queen whose acts were so ambiguous ; and Elizabeth was crowned by Oglethorpe, Bishop of Carlisle, on January 15, 1559. Ten days afterwards, Elizabeth opened her first Parliament, and the policy of the new reign was declared by Sir Nicholas Bacon. The Queen's desire, he said, was ** to unite the people of the realm in one uniform order": for this purpose they were to " eschew contumelious and opprobrious words as heretic, schismatic and Papist ". They were to make such laws as might ''tend to the establish- ment of God's Church and the tranquillity of the realm," avoiding what might " breed idolatry and superstition," yet " taking heed by no licentious or ' loose handling to give occasion for contempt or irreverence ". Laws were necessary also for reforming th/civil order of the realm, and repairing the losses and decays which the Crown had suffered. Calais was lost ; trade was stopped ; the coasts were un- protected. They must consider the need of self- preservation. The Queen assured them that she was PROBLEMS OP THE REIGN. $1 not " wedded to her ow^Bfentasy, nor for any private affection would quarrel with foreign princes," nothing was so dear to her as the good will of her people. When business began, the Acts necessary for the severance of the English Church from Rome were quickly introduced. First fruits were restored to the CrowM^whe proposal to restore the royal supremacy raised opposition from the Bishops. It was, however, a remarkable fact that never had that body been so numerically weak. The Metropolitan See of Canterbury was vacant by the death of Pole, who died at the same time as Mary. Nine other Bishops had died within the previous year^ and their sees had not been filled up« Of the remainder, some were ill, so that not more than ten were present in the House of Lords* Their opposition was unavail- ing; but it was necessary to silence them before proceeding to change of ritual. They were accord- ingly bidden to argue against theologians of a different opinion, in the presence of the Lords and Commons, the subjects of (i) the use of prayer in an unknown tongue ; (2) the right of national Churches to ordain their own rites and ceremonies ; (3) the sacrifice of the Mass. The controversy began on March 31, on the understanding that the Bishops were to speak first and their adversaries were to reply. This method did not satisfy the Bishops and, after two days, they refused to proceed. Indeed the disputation was 52 QUEEN ELIZABETH. merely an empty show ; \^l^ the refusal to continue was regarded as contempt. Two of the Bishops were committed to the Tower ; the rest were under bail to appear when called for. After this the " Act for Restoring to tHe~~Crown the Ancient Jurisdiction over the State ecclesiastical and spiritual," was passed. But «|^^eth refused the title of " Supreme Head of the Church," and substituted for it " Supreme Governor as well in spiritual and ecclesiastical causes as temporal". She had a conception of her own of the independence of the Church ; and, desirous as she was of power, she would not accept it where it was not rightly hers. She explained the practical meaning of the title to the Spanish ambassador : " she did not intend to be called Head of the Church, but .she could not let her subjects* money be carried out of the realm by the \ J^ Pope any more ". Meanwhile a Commission had been sitting for revising the Prayer Book of Edward VI. When their work was done, the " Act for Uniformity of Common Prayer " was passed, and the ecclesiastical change was legally complete. England was again independent. Its Church was again free to work out its own problems. Its system has not changed from that day to this. Perhaps in nothing was Elizabeth's foresight more conspicuous than in her ecclesiastical policy. She had a clear conception of the nature of the PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 53 Church, and was careful never to interfere with its independence. In this she was almost alone. Her ministers might take a political view of the matter; the Queen saw further than mere policy. Her definition of the royal supremacy reserved the freedom of the Church within the necessary sphere of allegiance to the State. It avoided collisions, but recognised spiritual authority. Elizabeth was anxious that the Church should manage its own affairs. On many occasions she declined to interfere in difficulties and refused to allow Parliament to, interfere. She maintained the authority of the Bishops and rated it higher than they did them- selves. She was willing to wait for the reformed system to take root and was content to guard it in its beginnings. In England generally the religious settlement was welcomed by the people and corresponded to their wishes. The English were not greatly interested in theological questions. They detested the Pope ; they wished for services which they could understand, and were weary of superstition. The number of staunch Romanists or strong Protestants was very small. The clergy were prepared to acquiesce in the change. Out of 9400 clergy in England, only 192 refused the oath of supremacy. Amongst these were all the Bishops, except Kitchin of Llandaff. Some of them fled abroad ; others were committed to the 54 QUEEN ELIZABETH. Tower and afterwards to private custody. There was some difficulty in filling up the vacant sees, owing to the unwillingness of Matthew Parker to accept the Archbishopric of Canterbury. Parker was a man admirably fitted for the post. He had been chaplain to Anne Boleyn, Master of Corpus College, Cambridge, and Dean of Lincoln. During Mary's reign he had lived quietly in hiding. He was known to Cecil as a man of great learning, of genuine piety and upright- ness. He had never been a partisan, and was untouched by the theology of Geneva or the theologi- cal quarrels of the Marian exiles. He was the man above all others to exercise a wise and moderating influence. At last his objections were overcome, and he was consecrated on December 17. In a short time the other sees were filled, and the momentous change was accomplished. The change did not produce much disturbance in England itself, but it seriously affected England's position in Europe, where the dividing line in politics was between Catholic and Protestant. If Elizabeth began her measures cautiously, it was because her eye was carefully fixed on Philip II., who was her only ally, and whose pronounced hostility would have been fatal. England was at war with France • and must make peace in company with Spain. Philip wished to maintain his alliance with England;* but b^ could not be the ally of an heretical Pow^r. So PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 55 anxious was he to check EHzabeth in her religious changes that, in January, 1559, he made her an offer of his hand. EHzabeth did not at once refuse, and paused for a time ; but, after a month's reflection, she decHned the offer saying that the Pope would not allow her to marry her brother-in-law, and that her people were strong enough to maintain their liberties at home and abroad. Really, she had come , to the conclusion that Philip would be compelled re- y luctantly to stand by her, whatever she did, through \ dread of increasing the power of France. Great as might be his attachment to the Papacy, his ancestral animosity to France was still greater. If Elizabeth [ y were removed, her successor on the English throne , \y would be Mary of Scotland, who was married to the 3^ Dauphin. It was better that England should be under an heretical Queen, who was under obligations to Spain, than that it should be an appanage of the French monarchy. Elizabeth felt that with a little dexterity she could drag Philip in her train. In the conference for peace France failed to sow distrust between England and Spain. The peace was con- cluded in April ; but England had to endure the loss of Calais, though it obtained from France a recognition of Elizabeth's right to the Crown. Elizabeth's first Parliament did not end without raising the question of the Queen's marriage. The Commons waited upon her at Whitehall, and the 56 QUEEN ELIZABETH. Speaker set forth their desire that the succession to the Throne should be tirmly established. Elizabeth answered in one of those speeches for which she became famous — a gracious acceptance of the request and an enunciation of great principles and admirable intentions, without committing herself to anything — a speech which pleased the ear and won the confi- dence, without enlightening the understanding, of the hearers. She would live for her people ; she would trust in Providence ; she would decide for the best ; provision should be made for a successor in God's good time ; her children, if she had any, might turn out ill. "As for me," she ended, "it shall be sufficient that a marble stone shall declare that a Queen, having lived and reigned so many years, died a virgin." Thus, from the first, she adopted the line of conduct which stood her in good stead. Marriage was an open question ; any particular alliance must be proved to be for the nation's good ; she had no wishes of her own. Thus her hand was a bait which might be dangled before the eyes of political aspirants; but Elizabeth knew that, if it were once swallowed, it was lost for ever. She loved power too much to give up any part of what she possessed. She was determined to make her position as a woman a help, rather than a hindrance, to her politics as a ruler. So, after refusing Philip, Elizabeth admitted the suit of his pear relative, the Archduke Charles, son of the PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 57 Emperor Ferdinand. She received his portrait with every sign of delight and hung it at the foot of her bed. She sent a Hst of inquiries to be made about him — his age, stature, height, fatness, strength, complexion, studies, education, temper and the like — asking even ** Whether he had been noted to have loved any woman, and in what kind ? " At the same time, Eric, son of Gustavus Vasa, King of Sweden, sent his brother to England to plead his cause, and wrote in terms ordevoted affection, asking for some ** little writing" declaring her feelings towards him. Meanwhile Elizabeth was relieving herself by carry- ing on a flirtation with Lord Robert Dudley, which sorely perturbed her ministers. We have a de- scription of her, in her galley, with the imperial ambassador, the Duke of Finland, and Lord Robert Dudley below — all engaged in trying to win her attention. No wonder Cecil sadly wrote : " Here is a great resort of wooers and controversy among lovers. Would to God the Queen had one, and the rest honourably satisfied." There was still another claimant for Elizabeth's hand whom Cecil secretly favoured. In his eyes^ the great danger to Elizabeth's throne came from the union between France and Scotland. Despite the stipulation of the peace of Cateau Cambresis, the Dauphiness Mary assumed the arms of England. The sudden death of Henry IL, in July, set her 58 QUEEN ELIZABETH. husband Francis II. on the French throne, and the management of affairs fell into the hands of his wife's kinsfolk, the Guises, whose plan was to sweep out heresy and unite Scotland and England with France. Scotland was ruled by the Queen-Regent, Mary of Guise, with the help of the French troops. On the Scottish side, England was always vulnerable, as the chronic warfare which prevailed along the Borders could at any moment become serious. The Warden of the Marches wrote that the iren of Teviotdale pillaged at will : " We be able nothing to withstand the enemy's power, they being of so great force and we so weak ". This was serious in view of French hostility, and some steps were necessary to secure the defences of the border. One method, which might be pursued with caution, was to incite the Scottish Protestants to rise against the Regent, and Sir Ralph Sadler was sent to Berwick with instruc- tions to " nourish faction between Scots and French ". It was, however, a dangerous matter for the English Queen to stir up rebellion in Scotland, especially if the rebellion were unsuccessful. The Protestant nobles tried to find some plausible reason for invoking Elizabeth's intervention, and at last discovered a substantial guarantee. James Hamilton, Duke of Chatelherault, had been Regent till he was ousted by the Queen : he would make over his claims to his gon, the Earl of Arran ; the French were then to be PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 59 expelled, Mary's claims to the Crown disannulled, and Arran married to Elizabeth. So, in August, Arran came secretly to London and was hidden in Cecil's house, where Elizabeth saw him, but soon decided that he was no match for her, though, as usual, she did not say so. It was hard for Elizabeth to decide what course to pursue towards Scottish affairs. It was dangerous to risk a war with France, in which Philip warned her he could not take part. Moreover, Elizabeth was entirely opposed to the principles on which the Scottish Lords were acting; she wished to be rid of Mary's claims on England, but she did not wish to help the Lords of the Congregation. The Calvinistic doctrine of election led to the consequence that princes who acted contrary to God's will ought to be deposed. The Scots claimed, in fact, the right of judging the title and character of their ruler — a claim to which Elizabeth's doubtful legitimacy made her doubly sensitive. How could she object to Spain or France fomenting insurrection in England if she gave help to the rebels in Scotland ? So Elizabeth long hesitated, and was moved only by the persistence of Cecil, who wrote " that as the proceeding for remov- ing the French out of Scotland does not please Her Majesty, he may, with her favour, be spared inter- meddling therein. In any other service, whether in kitchen or garden, he is ready from the bottom of hi§ 6o QUEEN ELIZABETH. heart to serve her to his life's end." Elizabeth was moved by Cecil's representations ; but she made her own reflections. She knew that, though her ministers might advise her, she had to bear the ultimate responsibility for her actions, and that her reputation was in her own keeping only. She also knew that the foremost desire of those who served her was to secure themselves against the possibility of Mary's accession, which would inevitably mean the loss of their heads. She concluded that some amount of uncertainty on this point was not undesirable, as it guaranteed their unswerving fidelity. She saw the desirability of using the opportunity for causing the chief men in England to commit themselves as opponents of Mary's succession ; and she grasped the need of caution. So Elizabeth set to work to play a game which bewildered every one. She adopted a more than feminine irresoluteness, and carried it into diplomacy with astonishing assurance. There was no truth nor honesty in anything she said. At the end of the year she sent Sir Nicholas Throgmorton to France with instructions : " If they shall ask whether she means to aid the Scots or no, he may assure them that at his departure hence no such thing was meant". She wrote to the Regent of Scotland that "all the foundation of all her doings was laid upon honour ^nd truth, which she esteems ?ibove all things ". PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 6t At the same time, she sent ships to Berwick, with orders to the admiral that " he might provoke a quarrel, if he did not find one ". No wonder that the Spanish ambassador wrote of her : " This woman is possessed with a hundred thousand devils ; and yet she pretends to me that she would like to be a nun, and live in a cell, and tell her beads from morning to night ". When Elizabeth at last made up her mind to help the Scots, she contrived, by much pressure, to induce the Duke of Norfolk to take command of the troops which she sent to the Borders. He was the premier Duke in England, a young man of no great ability as a commander; but it was worth while to associate him directly with a course of action which was in itself somewhat discreditable. When military operations were begun, the Scots tried to throw all the burden on their allies. The French reinforce- ments were dispersed by a gale in the Channel, and the English fleet blockaded Leith while it was besieged by land. The military operations were inglorious, and Leith surrendered only through famine and in consequence of the death of the Regent. In June both sides were ready to treat, and Cecil was sent as the English Commissioner. He had suffered much from the Queen's ill humour as she watched the slow success of the English arms. " I have had such a torment with the Queen's lC 62 QUEEN ELIZABETH. Majesty as an ague hath not in five fits so much abated me," he sadly wrote in May. The war was his doing, and he was held responsible for the result ; he was sent to win all that he could. On July 6, 1560, the treaty was signed at Edinburgh. It pro- vided for the withdrawal of the French troops from Scotland and the appointment of a Council of twelve nobles, appointed partly by the Scottish Queen and partly by the Parliament. Further, it was agreed that ** since the Kingdoms of England and Ireland rightly belonged to the serene Elizabeth, therefore the King and Queen Mary shall abstain from using the title and insignia of these realms for all future time ". These were substantial advantages which Cecil brought back. Elizabeth's right to the Crown was admitted by France; her relations with the Scots nobles were condoned, their claim to a share in the Government was granted ; and the threat of a hostile invasion from the Borders was removed. But Eliza- beth clamoured for more, and expressed herself dissatisfied. She counted the money which the war had cost and demanded substantial returns in pay- ment of an indemnity. The state of her finances at her accession impressed upon her the need of strict economy and careful management. She had sent to Antwerp Sir Thomas Gresham, who consolidated outstanding loans, reduced the interest, restored PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN, 63 England's credit, and bought cannon and ammuni- tion, which he secretly shipped to England. At home, the Queen diminished her household expenditure to a third of what it had been under Mary. She revived the military spirit of the Londoners and was present at the drill of the train-bands in St. James's Park, mounted on a Neapolitan courser. There were signs of a new England coming into being; but it would be helped on by strict frugality rather than by great undertakings. Elizabeth grudged every penny that she spent, and judged of military operations by their cost So when Cecil came back he was told by his friends that " no better service had ever been done to England," and that "the Queen could not have bought it too dearly ". But Elizabeth showed him no gratitude, either for his wise counsel or for his skilful diplomacy. She even left him to pay the expenses of his journey, which sorely embarrassed him. Cecil was greatly downcast, for he saw the Queen pursuing a course which he regarded as disastrous ; he saw her abandoning the counsel of her experienced advisers for that of Lord Robert Dudley, whom she treated with a familiarity that set all men's tongues wagging. Robert Dudley was the son of John, Duke of Northumberland, who had perished on the scaffold for his plot against Queen Mary. During the period of his father's power, under Edward VL, Robert 64 QUEEN ELIZABETH. had been known to Elizabeth. He was of the same age, and she admired him even as a boy "for his goodly person". At the age of eighteen he married Amy, daughter of Sir John Robsart, a Norfolk gentle- man of good property. He was committed to the Tower with his father, and was a captive at the same time as Elizabeth. After his release he did good service in the campaign against France, and fought in the battle of St. Quentin. On Elizabeth's ac- cession he was made Master of the Horse and a member of the Council. He was conspicuous in tournaments and other festivities of the Court, and the Queen's personal affection for him was undis- guised. The foreign ambassadors in England had no real belief in the marriage projects which they submitted to the Queen. As early as April, 1559, Feria wrote: " They tell me that she is enamoured of my Lord Robert Dudley and will never let him leave her side. He is in such favour that people say that she visits him in his chamber day and night. Nay, it is even reported that his wife has a cancer on the breast, and that the Queen waits only till she die to marry him." We know nothing of Dudfey's married life. There is no reason for thinking it un- happy, save that his wife did not accompany him to Court, but lived for the most part in the country, moving from place to place, where no one seemed to trouble themselves about her existence, as they PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 65 watched the growth of Dudley's greatness. In January, 1560, De Quadra spoke of him as " the King that is to be. There is not a man who does not cry out on him and her with indignation. She tells me that the Scots expect her to marry the Earl of Arran as a condition of the union. She will as little marry Arran as she will the Archduke; she will marry none but the favoured Robert." Hence it was that Cecil left the Court with a heavy heart, for his departure left the field open for Dudley, whom he knew to be empty-headed, self-seeking, and in- capable of any lofty purpose. De Quadra wrote of him with great outspokenness : " Lord Robert is the worst young fellow I ever encountered. He is heartless, spiritless, treacherous, and false." His object was to follo»g[^is father's steps and make himself ruler of ^^^^vby controllmg the Queen. For this purpose^BIPs^ influence must be over- thrown. Cecil was working for the union of Scotland and England by a marriage of the Queen with Arran : Dudley opposed a project which would have deprived him of his power. So, when Cecil came back from Scotland, he received neither gratitude for his services nor payment for his expenses, while Dudley was all- powerful and had just been granted a privilege, re- munerative to himself, but dangerous to the public finances, of exporting woollen goods free of duty. Cecil was so downcast that he thought of resigning 5 66 QUEEN ELIZABETH. office, when an unexpected event made a new call on his loyalty, and brought his enemy to his feet. This event was the sudden death of Dudley's wife. She was living at Cumnor Place, in Oxford- shire, in a house rented by Antony Forster, her husband's steward. On Sunday, September 8, she gave her servants leave to go to the fair at Abingdon. She dined alone with a lady living in the neighbour- hood. When the servants returned home late in the evening they found their mistress lying at the bottom of a staircase with her neck broken. When this news reached Windsor, where Dudley was in attendance on the Queen, they both felt that it exposed them to grave suspicions. Their famiH- arity was a matter of common talk ; and Dudley's am- bitious projects were scarcel^|^cealed. Dudley's wife was obviously an obst^^^Hhis way. It had been said that he woul^ di^(^ffer. Cecil, in his bitter mortification, had told the Spanish ambassador that Dudley would soon remove her by poison. A few days after this gloomy prophecy came the news of her death. What could be more clear than that she had been made away with ? Dudley seems to have thought that his wisest course was to court full inquiry and to take no part in it himself. He did not go to Cumnor, but sent his cousin to see that an inquest was held and the truth fully discovered. Two investigations were held, apparently with all PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 67 possible care ; but nothing could be discovered about the cause of the mishap, and a verdict v^^as returned of "accidental death". The most probable con- clusion is that Lady Amy's forlorn condition preyed upon her mind. " She had been heard many times to pray God to deliver her from desperation." The loneliness and darkness of the night, the empty house, may have suggested to her a means of ending a life which v^as a burden to herself and others. In a sudden fit of despair she opened the door and flung herself down the winding staircase. Dudley was not guilty of scheming her murder — indeed, the means adopted was too clumsy to have been deliberate — but he must have felt that he was guilty of gross neglect and utter disregard of one whom he was boun^ to cherish. It is no wonder that he did not venture to attend the funeral of one who in a very'real sense had been his victim. The result of this tragedy was the restoration of Cecil's power. Dudley put himself at once in Cecil's hands, as the only man who could advise him. " I pray you," he wrote, '* let me hear from you what you think best for me to do. If you doubt, I pray you ask the question, for the sooner you can advise me thither the more I shall thank you. I am sorry so sudden a chance should breed me so great a change : for methinks I am here all this while as it were in a dream, and far — too far — from the place I am bound 68 QUEEN ELIZABETH. to be.'* It was tacitly understood that Cecil was^to do his best to repair the scandal. Of course Eliza- beth's enemies had no doubt of Dudley's guilt or of Elizabeth's connivance. Mary Stuart, in France, laughed and said : " The Queen of England is about to marry her horsekeeper, who has killed his wife to. make room for her". Throgmorton sent his secretary from Paris to ask Elizabeth what he was to say. She looked ill and harassed and could only refer him to the verdict at the inquest "It fell out as should touch neither his honesty nor her honour". Eliza- beth, as she looked back upon the past, must have seen that she was repeating a former experience. She had endangered herself before by a coarse flirta- tion with Seymour: now there was no one to call her to account, but she was endangering her position by an unseemly flirtation with Dudley. Doubtless she saw her folly and regretted it ; but she was too proud to avow her regret, or to reverse her conduct suddenly. Still her eyes were open to the fact that she was derided abroad and had sown discontent at home. In the beginning of October she told Qecil ** that she had made up her mind and did not intend to marry Lord Robert " ; yet she did not break off her intimacy with him Her treatment of him varied with her moods. She proposed to make him a peer, but when the patent was brought for her signature she cut it in pieces with a knife, saying that ** the PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 69 Dudleys had been traitors through three descents ". When Dudley remonstrated, she "clapped him on the cheeks with ' No, no, the bear and the ragged staff is not so soon overthrown ' ". Some of the old nobles were of opinion that if the Queen would marry any one and bear children, it would be " the readiest way, with the help of God, to bring us a blessed Prince which shall redeem us out of thraldom". When, on this ground, they urged her to marry Dudley, she would "pup with her lips and say she could not marry a subject ". Political dangers for a time checked Elizabeth in her folly. France had not been able to interfere in Scotland, because the Huguenots^ helped by Eliza- beth's emissaries, had risen against the Guises. By the end of the year they were overcome, and the Guises were again triumphant. France refused to ratify the Treaty of Edinburgh oil the ground that " a treaty made by subjects without the consent of their Sovereign was void ". The French Queen con- tinued to bear the arms of England, and a renewal of warfare seemed imminent, when on December 5 Francis II. died and Mary was left a widow. France was no longer under the power of the Guises, and for a moment Elizabeth dreamed of using the opportunity to secure her personal happi- ness at the expense of England's welfare. She allowed Dudley to propose to De Quadra, the Spanish 70 QUEEN ELIZABETH. ambassador, that Philip should urge his marriage with the Queen, on condition that England returned to its old allegiance to the Pope. His own desires were purely personal ; he wished to marry the Queen, and was annoyed to find that the Anglican clergy preached against the marriage. He would show them that, if they opposed his plans, he could turn elsewhere ; and Elizabeth allowed his project to pro- ceed. She discussed it in February with De Quadra ; she told him, what he already knew, that " she was no angel " ; she had not made up her mind to marry Dudley, though she saw in him many excellent qualities ; but every day she felt the want of a husband : she would do nothing without Philip's sanction. > Luckily Philip delayed in answering, and Cecil contrived to get the negotiation into his hand. Just at this time a practical question arose, the answer to which affected the position of the English Church. Pope Pius IV. was engaged in summoning a Council to Trent, and a nuncio was on his way to invite England to send representatives. By England's answer to this request Philip could judge of Eliza- beth's sincerity. The proposal was beset with diffi- culties. On the one side, the English Church was a part of the Catholic Church ; and, in Cecil's words, ** could not refuse to allow the presidency of the Pope, provided it was understood that the Pope was not PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 71 above the Council, but merely its head ; and its decision should be accepted in England if they were in harmony with Holy Scripture and the first four Councils ". On the other side, could the Pope accept this position ? Could he recognise the English Bishops, who had abjured his supremacy, but, as Cecil pointed out, " had been apostolically ordained, and not merely elected by a congregation like Lutheran or Calvinist heretics " ? It was impossible to suppose that the Pope was prepared to recognise the constitution of the English Church ; if he did not, the coming of the nuncio would only stir up discontent. So the answer was given that England could not receive the nuncio ; it would send repre- sentatives to a free and really General Council, not to a Council where no man's voice would be heard " but such as were already sworn to the maintenance of the Pope's authority". When this answer was given on May 5, 1561, Dudley's intrigue dis- appeared ; though, a month later, De Quadra writes that he was in a barge on the Thames, with the Queen and Dudley, " when they began to talk non- sense, and went so far that Lord Robert said, as I was on the spot, there was no reason why they should not be married, if the Queen pleased. She said that perhaps I did not understand sufficient English." Certainly, at this period, Elizabeth allowed gross folly to lead her to the furthest point of wilfulness, and 72 QUEEN ELIZABETH. only in extremities fell back reluctantly on common sense and public duty. It was the question of her relation to Mary Stuart which restored Elizabeth to prudence. Probably opinions will always differ about the causes of the life-long hostility between the Queens, and how far it was inevitable. It is certain that Elizabeth re- garded Mary from the first as her chief enemy. She had warred in Scotland that she might secure from Mary the recognition of her right to the English Crown. Mary answered that she could not ratify the terms of the Treaty of Edinburgh, because they might be construed as a resignation of her right to be Elizabeth's heir. Elizabeth refused all friend- ship till the treaty was ratified, would not allow Mary to pass through England on her way to Scot- land in August, and even sent the English fleet to intercept her. From the day that Mary landed in Scotland till her death the two Queens stood in constant rivalry and waged a never-ending war. At first Elizabeth's unyielding attitude combined the Scots in Mary's favour, and Elizabeth was pressed to acknowledge her right of succession. V Indeed, the question of the succession was press- ing on many sides, and Elizabeth's objection to face it was beset with many difficulties. In August, 1561, great scandal was caused in the country by the discovery that Lady Catharine Grey was with child. PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 73 Lady Catharine was the sister of Lady Jane Grey, and, according to the will of Henry VI IL, was the next heir to the throne. She declared that she had been secretly married to the Earl of Hertford, eldest son of the Protector Somerset. It was clear that this clandestine marriage was the result of a political combination and had been contracted at a time when Elizabeth's flirtation with Dudley seemed likely to end in a marriage. The strong Protestants and the personal enemies of Dudley had combined to have a leader in the revolution which was expected to follow on the Queen's marriage with Dudley. Lady Catharine and her husband were sent to the Tower, and an attempt was made to discover who were privy to the marriage, which was declared invalid, as no witnesses were produced. It was soon found that many important persons had knowledge of it, and further inquiry was dropped. But Elizabeth wreaked her wrath on Catharine and her husband, who were kept rigorously in prison. By bribing their keepers they occasionally managed to meet, and Catharine bore another child. Elizabeth's anger increased, and Hertford was fined ^^15,000 for his offences. In vain Catharine pleaded forgiveness. During an outbreak of plague sjie was allowed to leave her prison for an uncle's house, but was again committed and only left the Tower again to die in 1567. 74 QUEEN ELIZABETH. The discovery of this intrigue made Elizabeth more anxious to come to terms with M^ry, and arrangements were made for a meeting between the two Queens. But Elizabeth was soon disturbed by another discovery. The Earl of Lennox, who had married the daughter of Margaret, sister of Henry VIII., had long been resident in England, where his wife held a high position. It appeared that Lady Lennox was trying to make herself leader of the Romanist party and was scheming to marry her son, Lord Darnley, to the Scottish Queen, so that "he should be King both of Scotland and England ". Lady Lennox was committed to the Tower ; but her plan was found to have a number of adherents and betokened danger. Whatever might have been Elizabeth's intentions with regard to Mary, they were changed by the aspect of affairs in France, where war had again broken out and the Guises were again regaining power. Their victory would be the signal for a rising in England, and Elizabeth could not afford to take any steps which would strengthen Mary's position as leader of the English Romanists. To check the Guises, ^ Elizabeth sent help to their opponents, but even then she made it plain that her real desire was to secure English interests by occupying Dieppe and Havre as guarantees for the restoration of Calais. But the Huguenots were defeated, and in the paci- PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 75 fication which followed England received nothing. The Earl of Warwick vainly endeavoured to hold Havre against the French forces. A plague broke out among the English garrison ; and there were sad complaints of mismanagement in sending out military supplies. *' The cast-iron pieces were waste and unserviceable ; there was want of stocks, axle-trees and wheels ; they were short of ramrods by one half; the carpenters sent out were utterly ignorant of their art ; the shot was utterly destroyed ; there were no bowstrings or arrows." Warwick was driven to evacuate Havre in July, 1563, and the expedition ended in complete disaster. .Parliament, which met at the beginning of the year, showed its temper by passing an *' Act for the Assurance of the Queen's Power over all Estates," which made all who upheld the Pope's authority or jurisdiction liable to the penalties of praemunire, and imposed the oath of Supremacy on all holders of office, lay or spiritual, in the realm. It further urged the Queen's marriage and the settlement of the succession. As a sample of Elizabeth's oratory, the speech with which she dismissed Parliament may be quoted : — " The two petitions that you presented me, in many words expressed, contained these two things in sum, as of your cares the greatest — my marriage and my succession — of which two, the I^t, T think, is best 76 QUEEN ELIZABETH. to be touched ; and of the other, a silent thought may serve ; for I had thought it had been so desired as none other tree's blossoms should have been minded ere hope of my fruit had been denied you. But to the last, think not that you had needed this desire, if I had seen a time so fit, and it so ripe to be denounced. The greatness of the cause, therefore, and need of your returns doth make me say that which I think the wise may easily guess — that as a short time for so long a continuance ought not to pass by rote, as many telleth tales, even so as cause by conference with the learned shall show me matter worthy utterance for your behoof, so shall I more gladly pursue your good, after my days, than with my prayers be a means to linger my living thread. ... I hope I shall die in quiet with a Nunj Dimittis, which cannot be without I see some glimpse of your following after my graved bones. And, by the way, if any doubt that I am as it were by vow or determination bent never to trade that life, put out that heresy ; your belief is awry — for as I think it best for a private woman, so do I strive with myself to think it not most meet for a prince— and if I can bend my will to your need, I will not resist such a mind." Surely perverse ingenuity could not go further in the discovery of ambiguous utterance. The members of Parliament must have retired in bewilderment. PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 77 However, Elizabeth, by this time, seems to have made up her mind that marriage with Dudley was im- possible, and that any marriage would really weaken her__position. It is very probable that she believed she would be childless ; and a marriage without issue would necessitate a settlement of the succession. With a husband on one side and a recognised suc- cessor on the other, her own position would be much weaker. Her strength lay in the uncertainty about the future, which bound all her followers to a personal loyalty of unswerving devotion. As it was, the interests of all who were concerned in making the new England were necessarily bound up with the maintenance of Elizabeth's throne. Why should she, by any act of hers, alter this ? Uncertainty about the future might perplex her people; "tut was any certainty within reach which would give them greater hope ? With an im- perious fatalism the Queen resolved to keep what she had and leave the future to care for itself. She met each separate proposal for her marriage with dexterity, and, without declaring any fixed intention, allowed it to pass away. She was always willing to entertain proposals, but always found some fatal flaw. She wished to educate England to look to herself Llone. Experience also had taught her that it was safest to stand by herself. Doubtless she was at- tracted to Dudley by his physical charms, and she allowed herself to enjoy his companionship in her 78 QUEEN ELIZABETH. idle hours. Perhaps she thought that by marrying a subject she would be more free than if she marned^^ foreign prince. She was too acute not to see through Dudley's ambition, and she was too greedy of power not to see how much she would lose by sharing it with any one. She keenly watched the growth of Dudley's assumption of authority, when he felt secure of her favour. She delighted in reminding him of his dependence. When he presumed, she put him to open shame. Thus, in the height of his power, he resented that one of his followers was refused admis- sion to the Privy Chamber by the usher, who had his orders about the quality of those who were to enter. Dudley turned upon him, angrily called him a knave, and vsaid that he should not continue long in his office. The usher stepped in before Dudley, and kneeling before the Queen, told her what had occurred and asked her pleasure. Elizabeth turned furiously on Dudley: "God's death, my Lord, I have wished you well, but my favour is not so locked up for you that others shall not partake thereof ; for I have many servants, unto whom I have, and will at my pleasure, bequeath my favour and likewise reserve the same. And, if you think to rule here, I will take a course to see you forthcoming. I will have here but one mistress, and no master." This rebuke, we are not surprised to hear, so quelled Dudley ** that his feigned humility was long after one of his best virtues ". In PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 79 fact, Elizabeth discovered the advantages to be gained by combining the parts of the woman and the Queen. As Queen, she could administer reproofs in public ; as woman she could forgive in private. Her real grati- fication lay in receiving homage ; and the homage of an aspiring suitor was more certain than even that of a dependent and submissive husband^/ When Elizabeth had made up her mind, so far as her mind was ever made up, as regards herself, she could afford to interest herself in Mary's marriage projects. Mary wished to marry Don Carlos or the Archduke Charles of Austria, and so increase her political influence. Elizabeth informed her that if she married into the Royal House of Spain, France or Austria, she would regard her as an enemy ; if she chose a Protestant prince or a French noble she would name her as her successor. A little later she proposed that Mary should marry an English noble- man, or some other great person of another realm, " not of such greatness as suspicion might be gathered that he might intend trouble to the realm ". At last, with an air of one who makes a supreme sacrifice, she suggested Lord Robert Dudley. How far Eliza- beth was sincere in making this proposal cannot be determined. It is just possible that she trusted in Dudley's devotion to herself to avoid the dangers which might beset her if Mary was recognised as her successor. It is also possible that she made a 8o QUEEN ELIZABETH. proposal, which she knew that Mary would bitterly resent, in the hopes of goading her to take a step which would make her recognition impossible. Either result would be an immediate gain. Perhaps she chose to invent a position which admitted of alter- native issues. While she awaited the results of this suggestion, Elizabeth, in August, 1564, paid a visit to Cambridge, that she might solace her mind in that ancient seat of learning, and find some relief from her perplexities by captivating the youthful enthusiasm of its students. Cecil, as Chancellor, with his usual carefulness, super- vised every detail of the ceremonial to be observed. On August 5 the Queen entered Cambridge by Newnham Mill, where she was received by the Mayor and Corporation. Then she proceeded to King's College, along a line of students and masters, marshalled in order. At the west door of the chapel she was welcomed by the inevitable orator, to whose Latin speech she listened carefully, shaking her head in deprecation of his praises, and sometimes expres- sing her modesty in articulate Latin. When he praised the unmarried life, she said : " God's blessing of thine heart ; there continue **. When he had finished, she said " that she would answer him again in Latin, but for fear she should speak false Latin, and then he would laugh at her". Then she passed into the chapel, where a stately service was sung. PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 8l The Queen lodged in King's College ; and, on the next day, which was a Sunday, attended service at the University Church, walking under a canopy carried by the four senior doctors. After evensong the "Aulularia" of Plautus was acted in King's College Chapel, and the performance was not over till midnight. On the following day the University lectures and disputations were resumed, and the Queen was present as an interested onlooker. In the evening a play, on the somewhat inappropriate subject of '' Dido," was provided for her amusement. On the following day Elizabeth visited the various Colleges, being greeted at each by a Latin speech, and receiving a volume of Latin and Greek verses composed in her honour by members of the College. Returning to her lodging, *' as Her Grace rode through the street, she talked much with divers scholars in Latin". The last day of her stay-in Cambridge wasTdevoted to an academic ceremonial. The most learned doctors were chosen to dispute on two significant conclusions : " That the authority of Scripture is greater than that of the Church," and that " The civil magistrate has authority in ecclesias- tical matters ". When these had been satisfactorily proved, the Duke of Norfolk and Lord Robert Dudley knelt before the Queen and '' humbly desired her to speak something to the University, and in Latin ". At first she affected coyness and asked that she 6 t2 QVEEN ELIZABETH. might speak in English. Cecil reminded her that the University always used Latin as its official language. Elizabeth asked Cecil to speak for her, " because the Chancellor was the Queen's mouth ". Cecil, with due gravity, replied that ''he was Chan- cellor of the University, not hers ". The Bishop of Ely pleaded that ** three words of her mouth were enough ". After this little play had been performed, the Queen pronounced a carefully prepared oration which delighted the hearer by its aptness. She assured them of her love for learning, her apprecia- tion of their loyalty, her gratification of all she had seen. One sorrow alone oppressed her; like Alexander the Great, she mourned that she had predecessors who had done so much. She solaced herself by the reflection that Rome was not built in a day, and that she was still young. " My age is not so far advanced but that, before I pay my last debt to nature, if cruel Atropos do not too soon cut the thread of my life, I may erect some noble work." When the applause was over she asked that " all ■ who had heard her speak might drink of the waters of Lethe". ('^^ U is on such occasions as these that we see the I secret of Elizabeth's charm — her dignity, her ready \ sympathy, her dexterity, her sprightliness, her social \ readiness, and her intellectual powers. But even in Cambridge she promised what she did not perform. Problems of the reigM. 83 No noble wiaiLJwas ^ erected by her bounty, and Elizabeth's successors had nothing to fear from her rivalry wTth those who had gone before. The Duke of Norfolk alone was moved to make a benefaction to Magdalene College. It was not long before Elizabeth held high state and indulged her love for ceremonial in a matter which seriously concerned her. On September 29 Lord Robert Dudley was created Earl of Leicester so as to fit him for his proposed marriage to Mary of Scotland. We have a description of this scene from the pen of Sir John Melville, who came as Mary's envoy to discuss her future. Melville, on his arrival, found Elizabeth angry at a '* despiteful letter " which she had received from Mary. " I was minded," she said, '* to answer it with another as despiteful." She took her answer from her pocket and read it ; Melville persuaded her to forbear sending it. She asked for Mary's answer to her proposal that she should marry Dudley. Melville answered that it would be discussed at a meeting of commissioners from both realms, in which Mary expected that England would be repre- sented by the Earl of Bedford and Lord Robert Dudley. " You make small account of Lord Robert," said Elizabeth, " seeing you name the Earl of Bedford before him. But I will make him a greater Earl, and you shall see it done before you go home." She called Dudley "her brother and best friend, whom 84 QUEEN ELIZABETH. she would have married herself had she minded to take a husband ". Being determined to die a virgin, she wished Mary to marry him; this would "free her mind of all fears and suspicions to be offended by any usurpation before her death ; being assured that he was so loving and trusty that he would never suifer any such thing to be attempted in her time **. So Dudley, with much pomp, was created Baron Denbigh, and afterwards Earl of Leicester. Elizabeth put the mantle on him and girt him with his sword, as he knelt before her; **but she could not refrain from putting her hand in his neck, smilingly tickling him ". Then she turned and asked Melville how he liked him. Melville diplomatically answered that the Princess was happy who could reward such a worthy servant. Swiftly Elizabeth pointed to Darnley, who bore the sword of state, and whispered : ** Yet you like better of yonder long lad ". Melville gives an account of many interviews with Elizabeth which contain curious details. One day she took him into her bedroom, and opened a little cabinet containing several pictures, each wrapped in paper, with the name written upon it. She took up one labelled ** My Lord's picture '*. Melville pressed to see it, and she reluctantly gave him permission. It was a portrait of Leicester. Melville asked to carry it back for Mary. " No," said Elizabeth, "it is the only one I have." " Your Majesty," answered PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 85 Melville, " hath the original," and he pointed to Leicester, in the other end of the room. Elizabeth turned to Mary's picture and kissed it with every show of affection. She showed Melville her jewels, and said that if Mary would only follow her counsel she would, in time, have all her possessions. At other times Elizabeth talked with Melville, who had travelled far, about other countries, especially the fashions of ladies' dress. Every day she wore a different costume, and inquired of Melville, as a man of taste, which became her best. '' I answered, in my judgment, the Italian dress; which answer, I found, pleased her well, for she delighted to show her golden-coloured hair, wearing a caul and bonnet, as they do in Italy. Her hair was rather reddish than yellow, and curled naturally." She asked Melville which was most beautiful, she or Mary. It needed all his courtliness to escape at last with the answer " that they were both the fairest ladies in their countries ". She asked which was tallest. Melville answered Mary. "Then," said she, "she is too high, for I myself am neither too high nor too low." She inquired if Mary played well. Melville, driven to bay, said : " reasonably for a Queen ". That evening, after dinner, Elizabeth contrived that Melville should surprise her playing on the virginals, which he admits that she did exceedingly well. On discovering his presence, she rose, " and c^rae for- 86 QUEEN ELIZABETH. ward, seeming to strike him with her hand ; alleging that she used not to play before men, but when she was solitary to shun melancholy ". However, she asked whether Mary or she played best, and Melville, " in this was obliged to give her the praise ". When Melville wished to depart he was stayed two days that he might have an opportunity of seeing the Queen dance. Then she inquired if she or Mary danced best. He answered that Mary " danced not so high nor so disposedly as she did ". Elizabeth expressed her longing to see Mary quietly, and Melville sardonically proposed that she should ac- company him to Scotland, disguised as a page. She answered with a sigh: "Alas, if I might do it thus ! " It is impossible to say what Elizabeth meant by this conduct ; but her want of straightforwardness was infectious. Leicester inquired of Melville what the Queen of Scots thought of him, and was answered coldly. He excused himself for his presumption in seeking Mary's hand and said that the proposal came from Cecil, his secret enemy, "for if I should have appeared desirous of that marriage I should have offended both the Queens and lost their favour". Indeed, in making this confession, Leicester spoke out the true feeling which lay at the bottom of many minds. It was uncertain which Queen's favour was most worth seeking, which of the two would PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 87 ultimately enjoy the English throne. Cecil was one of the few who were resolutely committed to Elizabeth. Elizabeth's own wishes about Mary's marriage are obscure. She knew that " the long lad," Darnley, was a candidate ; she knew that Leicester was in many ways objectionable. Yet she could not allow her commissioners to name other English nobles, such as Norfolk or Arundel. " She could see none for her own contentation meeter for the purpose than one who for his good gifts she esteemed fit to be placed in the number of kings and princes." She would not even promise to recognise Mary as her successor till the marriage with Leicester had actually been accomplished. But while thus seeming to press Leicester to the exclusion of all others, she allowed Darnley to join his father Lennox, in Scotland, though she knew the projects formed about him. It would almost seem that Elizabeth really wished Mary to contract this marriage. Her alliance with Spain or Austria would have led to a crusade against England. To avert this possiblity, to gain time, and to seem willing to do something, Elizabeth proposed the marriage with Leicester. Knowing that this proposal was offensive to Mary, and not wishing it to succeed, she put Darnley in Mary's way, as the least dangerous of possible candidates. At any rate, if Mary married Darnley, her recognition as heir 88 QUEEN ELIZABETH, to the Crown would be deferred for a time ; and no one could say what the future might bring forth. While the matter still hung in the balance, there was no diminution in Elizabeth's familiarity with Leicester. One day he was playing tennis with the Duke of Norfolk, while the Queen was looking on ; Leicester took the Queen's handkerchief from her hand to wipe his face, whereon Norfolk's anger against the upstart favourite blazed forth and he threatened to beat him with his racket. Hard words were exchanged on both sides, and the Queen ** was sore offended with the Duke ". It was obvious that the record of such like scenes should reach Mary's ears and strengthen her objection to marriage with the Queen of England's minion. When, however, the probability of Mary's marriage with Darnley was discussed in England, its dangers became suddenly apparent. It increased Mary's title and made her seem less of an alien. If it reduced the chances of an invasion of England, it gave greater chance of raising up a faction within the realm itself. Bluster and menace were used to bend Mary's resolution ; Lennox and Darnley were recalled to England, but refused to obey. Elizabeth found that she had miscalculated in supposing that the prospect of Mary's marriage with Darnley would cause a disturbance in Scot- land. There was no sij^n of a rising to prevent it. PROBLEMS OF THE REIGN. 89 The general feeling of England was somewhat in favour of it : if Elizabeth herself would not marry, it was well that Mary should take a husband of such lineage that her offspring would be nearer of blood to the Tudor Hne and so more English. In spite of all that Elizabeth could say or do, the marriage was solemnised on July 29, 1565. Hitherto the two Queens had been watching one another with ill-disguised animosity and suspicion. Now Mary had taken the first step in aggression. Elizabeth would not marry because she could find no match which would strengthen her position, while Mary had secured a husband which brought her nearer to the English Crown. Elizabeth could only retort by reviving the old proposal of marriage with the Austrian Archduke. At least that was something which might be kept continually in reserve. To add to her difficulties, just at this time, the third daughter of the Duke of Suffolk, the only one who remained in the line of succession laid down by Henry VUL, Lady Mary Grey, was found to have contracted a secret marriage. The object of her affections was Thomas Keys, the Queen's serjeant porter. The matter was ludicrous, as the Lady Mary was so small that she was almost a dwarf, while Keys had been chosen for his post owing to his huge proportions, Moreover, the bridegroom was twice the age of the bride and was a widower with several phildr^p. go QUEEN ELIZABETH. Elizabeth committed Keys to the Fleet and Lady Mary to confinement in the houses of friends. The luckless pair were never allowed to meet again. But the last chance of putting forth the successor through the Greys had now disappeared. Mary Stuart stood fronting Elizabeth, dreaded yet inevitable, as her only possible successor, and therefore the necessary repre- sentative of all who were discontented in England. If Elizabeth distrusted Mary when she refused to ratify the Treaty of Edinburgh, she now regarded her with dread. In the duel between the two Queens, Mary had made the first hit ; and Elizabeth could only gird herself to greater watchfulness in the future. Mary's success was chiefly due to her own imprudence. CHAPTER III. ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. The result of Mary's marriage was that, for a time, Elizabeth was reduced to the position of a discredited and somewhat fearful spectator of her doings. At first she had some hopes from a rising of the Protes- tant nobles under Murray ; but she was afraid to help them openly ; they were promptly defeated and took refuge in England. Never did Elizabeth sink to a lower depth of duplicity than when Murray, contrary to her wishes, made his way into her presence. She rebuked him for rebellion; she declared that the '* Queen of Scots had been her good sister, and such she always expected to find her"; she disclaimed any knowledge of his projects ; she dismissed him in disgrace. Having performed this comedy for the good of the ambassadors of France and Spain, she wrote an account of it to Mary. Her only object seemed to be to avoid giving Spain any ground for interference. Absolute caution, however degrading, was, in her opinion, necessary. When she pleaded with Mary in Murray's behalf, her ambassador 92 QUEEN ELIZABETH. Randolph was ordered to leave Scotland. Mary's power was daily increasing, and Elizabeth felt herself in serious danger. From this she was released by the quarrel between Mary and her husband, which led to the murder of Rizzio, at Holyrood, on March 9, 1566. For a time Mary's power seemed broken, but she recovered herself by dauntless energy, and Elizabeth again refused to identify herself with the Scottish rebels. On June ig was born Mary's son, James, and the news was a bitter blow to Elizabeth. Dropping into a seat, she wailed : ** The Queen of Scots is mother of a fair son, and I am but a barren stock ". England rejoiced at the news, and Elizabeth felt that it was hard for her to delay much longer the recognition of Mary as her successor. She could not refuse to meet her Parliament, which was sure to raise the question. Her popularity was waning, her enemies were increas- ing ; in many counties preparations were being made for a rising in Mary's behalf. To escape the despondency caused by these cares, Elizabeth, in August, set forth to visit Oxford, as she had visited Cambridge two years before. First she went to Woodstock and revived the memories of her imprisonment, when peril was as near as it was at present. Leicester, as Chancellor of Oxford, had the advantage of Cecil's experience in making arrange- ments at Cambridge, and found his task ^n easy one. ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 93 There was the same ceremonious reception when she entered the town ; but she looked askance at the Vice-Chancellor, Lawrence Humphreys, a noted Puritan, and said : " Mr. Doctor, that loose gown becomes you mighty well ; I wonder your notions should be so narrow ". She passed between the rows of applauding students to Carfax, in the centre of the town, where the Greek professor greeted her with a Greek oration, to which she made a suitable reply in the same tongue. Thence she went to Christ Church, where she was to lodge. Five days were spent in listening to disputations, visiting the Colleges, and receiving a vast supply of complimentary poems, and attending performances of Latin and English dramas which were acted by the students. A play which told the story of Palamon and Arcite was so lengthy that it occupied two nights ; every one opined that its plot was better than that of Damon and Pythias, which was then fashionable. The exercises of dialecticians were listened to with all the admiration and enthu- siasm that now has been transferred to athletic sports, and the prowess of disputants was valued as we now value that of a cricketer. When these contests were over Elizabeth ad- dressed the University in Latin. The evening shadows were falling, and she dexterously' began by saying: "Those who do ill hate the light; and be- cause I know that I will speak ill to you, I think this 94 QUEEN EUZABETM. time of gathering darkness is most suitable". She divided what she had to say in two parts : praise and blame. The praise was for the University, the blame for herself. ** My parents took good care that I should be well educated, and I had great practice in many languages, of which I take to myself some knowledge ; but, though I say this with truth, I say it with modesty. I had many learned teachers, but they laboured in a barren and unproductive field, which brought forth fruit unworthy alike of their toil and of your expectation. Therefore you have praised me abundantly, I am conscious that I deserve not your praise But I will end this speech, which is full of barbarisms, with one earnest wish and prayer. My prayer is this, that during my lifetime you may be most flourishing, after my death most happy." When she left Oxford the civic magistrates accom- panied her to Magdalen Bridge, where their jurisdic- tion ended ; the representatives of the University went to Shotover Hill, where the bounds of the University were reached. There was one last Latin speech ; then Elizabeth waved her hand and said : *' Farewell, famous University ; farewell, my faithful subjects : farewell, dear scholars ; and may God bless your studies. Farewell, farewell." Then she rode onwards. On her return to London Parliament met at the end of September. The question of the succession ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 95 Was uppermost in every mind, and all other business was of secondary importance. In vain Elizabeth tried to avert its discussion by vague promises of marriage and by personal remonstrance with the chief peers. A joint address of the two Houses was presented on November 5, and received an angry answer ; what had she done that they shc^uld accuse her of " careless care of this her dear realm " ? Cecil conveyed the royal displeasure to the Houses and ordered them to be silent on this subject. There was a long discussion if such an order were not against the privileges of the House, but Elizabeth sent for the Speaker and repeated her command " that there should be no further argument ". A member strayed into the forbidden subject, and Elizabeth had him put under arrest. The Commons began to consider their privileges. Elizabeth saw that she had gone too far. She released the imprisoned member, and sending for the Speaker, informed him that " she did revoke her two former commandments requiring the House no further at this time to proceed in the matter". But she nursed her wrath till the end of the session, when she dismissed Parliament, saying at the end of her speech : — ** Do you think that either I am so unmindful of your surety by succession, wherein is all my care, considering I know myself to be but mortal ? No, I warrant you. Or that I went about to break your ^6 QUEUN nUZABEfH. liberties ? No, it never was my meaning ; but td stay you before you fell into the ditch. For all things have their time ; and although perhaps you may have after me a better, learneder, or wiser, yet I assure you, none more careful over you. And therefore henceforth, whether I live to see the like assembly or no, or whoever it be, yet beware how you prove your Prince's patience as you have now done mine. ** And now to conclude all this. Notwithstanding, not meaning to make a Lent of Christmas, the most part of you may assure yourselves that you depart in your Prince's grace." Elizabeth had no doubt of her power to rule and was determined that no one should doubt her capa- city to do so. There were matters which she alone could manage, and she demanded implicit trust in her discretion where questions of national policy were concerned. Her objections to the discussion of her marriage and of the succession were not founded on personal grounds. She claimed that she alone could judge what was for the real interests of her realm. Events in Scotland came to her help and occupied the minds of men. On February lo, 1567, Darnley was murdered, and Elizabeth received the news with every appearance of sorrow. It must, however, have given her a sense of profound relief. She had felt that Mary was gaining and that herself was losing. ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 97 Now was an opportunity of asserting her superiority. Her own desire all along had been to maintain Mary in Scotland, but to reduce her to a position of de- pendence on herself. Hitherto she had been baffled : now she might succeed. So she adopted the attitude of Mary's candid friend and adviser. She wrote to her expressing her horror at the news of the murder ; and then continued : " Madam, I should ill fulfil the part either of a faithful cousin or of an affectionate friend, if I were to content myself with saying pleasant things to you and made no effort to pre- serve your honour. I cannot but tell you what all the world is thinking. Men say that, instead of seizing the murderers, you are looking through your fingers while they escape. For myself, I beseech you to believe that I would not harbour such a thought for all the wealth of the world. I entreat you to let no interest, no persuasion, keep you from proving to every one that you are a noble Princess and a loyal wife." With this letter was a proposal for the ratification of the Treaty of Edinburgh, and the establishment of a Church in Scotland on the lines of the Church of England. With good advice went a request for substantial advantages. Whether or no Mary would have followed Eliza- beth's advice is an open question. It is certain that she did not ; and her marriage with Bothwell, on May 15, was the signal for a rising against her. 7 98 QUEEN ELIZABETH. She was taken prisoner and was confined in Loch- leven Castle on June 17. Elizabeth gave no help to the confederate Lords and entirely disapproved of their action. She was sensitive about the rights of Princes. She felt that she owed much to the for- bearance of foreign Powers, and was resolved to set a good example. At the same time, she purposed to use the position of self-appointed mediator in a lofty manner. She sent her commands to the Scottish nobles as one having authority. They were ordered to release the Queen, to inquire into Bothwell's guilt for Darnley's murder, to provide for a meeting of the Scottish Parliament and a general pacification, and to bring Prince James to England for safe keeping. Elizabeth certainly asked enough and asserted un- mistakably the claims of a feudal superiori^'. Her ministers saw that her demandj>- were hopeless of attainment ; but, in matters which concerned her position as a Sovereign,. Elizabeth would brook no "advice. She preferred the issues of bold diplomacy to action. The duties of one Sovereign Prince to- wards another were to be determined by the Sovereign alone. Perhaps Elizabeth was saving her personal credit at small cost. She knew that her demands were impossible. A full investigation of recent occurrences in Scotland was not to be thought of, as every one of position was involved either in the murder of Rizzio ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. gg or of Darnley; and an inquiry once instituted could not be limited. The Lords refused to listen to Elizabeth's envoy, Sir Nicholas Throgmorton. Elizabeth wrote to him : " We do detest the murder of our cousin the King; but the head cannot be subject to the foot, and we cannot recognise in them any right to call their Sovereign to account. You shall plainly tell them that, if they determine any- thing to the deprivation of the Queen, their Sovereign, we are well assured of our determination that we will make ourselves a plain party against them to the revenge of their Sovereign for all posterity." The Lords extracted from Mary her signature to a document in which she abdicated in favour of her son. Throgmorton publicly protested, and privately pleaded that, at least, Mary's life should be spared. Elizabeth threatened war, and Cecil pointed out that "the malice of the world would say that she had used severity to the Lords to urge them to rid away the Queen". Elizabeth had failed in her plan of keeping Mary on the Scottish throne, weak, discredited and dependent on herself, who had established her position as arbiter of Scottish affairs, and would organise the country on the model of England. ^ All this, however, added to the perplexity of those who were anxious about England's future. Mary of Scotland had been tacitly regarded as Elizabeth's loo QUEEN ELIZABETH. successor. Now all was plunged in uncertainty. Troubles in the Netherlands had led Philip of Spain to send a large army to subdue the rebels ; if it suc- ceeded, England lay temptingly near. Elizabeth's marriage could alone avert danger, and the claims of the Archduke Charles of Austria were again pressed upon her by the Council. Though a Romanist, he had learned to tolerate Lutheranism, and so would not be hostile to the English Church. By Elizabeth's marriage with him England would be on friendly terms with Spain and would be recognised as allied with the Courts of Europe. So the Earl of Sussex was sent to Vienna to see if matters could be arranged. The chief point con- cerned religion. Sussex was to point out that uni- formity was a principle of English politics : " Many inconveniences had happened in other countries from maintaining contrariety in religion. England differed from all other States that it could not suffer those diversities of religion which others were seen to do. The law touched no man's conscience, so as public order was not violated by external act or teaching." The Queen could not change her laws for a marriage. Charles was invited to return with Sussex and see for himself. Sussex reported that Charles was willing to come to England and would accept all the Queen's conditions, save on the matter of his religion. He would accompany the Queen to public service ; he ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. loi asked only for the use of a private chapel where he could hear Mass, which no EngHshman should be allowed to attend. These were reasonable requests, which Elizabeth might have granted if she had been in earnest. But Elizabeth was never in earnest about her marriage, and she knew that if Charles once came to England it would be difficult to find an escape. If he had consented to abandon his religious opinions, that would have been a sacrifice which would have satisfied her vanity and would have bound him to herself. As it was, she doubted if. a Romanist Prince in England might not cause trouble. "God^' she said, "had so far prospered her by keeping England in peace, while France, Scotland and Flanders were torn by war ; she minded still to please Him by continuing her whole realm in one manner of religion." Yet, if the Archduke would come, all might be settled ; during his visit he should have " such use of his religion as should be found possible ". If he came in the hopes of pro- curing toleration for the Romanists, *' his coming would be both vain and dishonourable ". After such an equivocal answer, nothing was to be done. Charles refused to put himself in a false position, and Elizabeth would give him rio positive assurance. She was not entirely insincere in her advances; but she was not satisfied that the ad- vantages to be gained were equivalent to the risk I02 QUEEN ELIZABETH. which would be incurred. Her ministers looked only to the present ; Elizabeth looked to the future. She had been accustomed all her life to live amid un- certainties, and had none of the faith which makes a bold venture. The return must be quite sure before she would make a sacrifice. She would pursue a project up to the final point and then reject it. She wondered that others did not see difficulties as clearly as herself; but she could not follow their superior confidence. Sorely to the disappointment of Cecil, the negotiation with Charles came to an end and was not renewed. On May 2, 1568, Mary of Scotland escaped from Lochleven Castle and was again at the head of a band of adherents. Elizabeth's position was again very difficult. She had defended Mary when she was a prisoner, what was she to do now she was at large ? Elizabeth's real wish was to set Mary again on the throne, but in such a way as to make her, and through her Scotland, dependent on England. Hence when Mary was in prison, Elizabeth was her friend ; now that Mary was striving to win back her position by herself, Elizabeth remembered her misdeeds. She wrote Mary a letter in which she reminded her that in the past she had " shown small respect for her state and honour"; she was prepared to help her if she would now follow her advice, which was to desist from force and submit to Elizabeth's arbitration between ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 103 herself and her subjects. But before Elizabeth's mes- sage reached her, Mary's troops were scattered at Langside and she was a fugitive in Galloway. There were three courses possible for Mary ; to remain in hiding till her adherents had again rallied ; to sail for France ; or to take refuge in England. In the light of after events, it seems strange that she chose the last of these possibilities. But it suited her temperament to play an adventurous game, and she thought that by a little pressure she could force Elizabeth to intervene on her behalf. On May 16 she crossed the Solway, and was escorted to the Castle of Carlisle. Such had been Mary's haste that she had brought with her no change of dress ; and it is odd to find that Carlisle could not supply her needs. When Elizabeth heard of her condition she sent her some clothing. When the parcel was opened, it contained " two torn shifts, two pieces of black velvet, two pair of shoes, and nothing else ". Sir Francis Knowles, who brought this munificent gift, was driven by shame to say ''that Her Highness's maid had mistaken and sent such things necessary for such a maid-servant as she was herself". Was it insolence, or parsimony, or carelessness, which led to such an extraordinary breach of courtesy? Whichever it might be, it betokened ill for Eliza- beth's hospitality. Mary demanded that she should be received at I04 QUEEN ELIZABETH, Court and should be allowed to explain her position to Elizabeth. This demand raised great difficulties. Mary claimed to be the second person in the realm, and her reception at Court would have been a recog- nition of her claim. She was informed that she must prove her innocence of the charges laid against her before she could be admitted to the Queen's presence. She then demanded '* to be allowed to pass into France to seek aid at other Princes' hands ". This was hard to refuse on any personal ground ; but it was too much to expect that Elizabeth would run the risk of provoking French interference in Scotland. The only answer she could give was that '* all convenient means would be used for Mary's relief and comfort". In fact, Elizabeth still clung to her old policy. Mary, weak and discredited, was to be restored to nominal rule in Scotland, while really reduced to dependence on England. So Elizabeth assured her that she would " have care both of her life and honour". " Does it seem strange," she^went on, *' that you are not allowed to see me ? I entreat you to put yourself in my place. When you are acquitted of this crime I will receive you with all honour ; till that is done, I may not." Later, she explained that she must not receive her, or else she. would seem to be pinrtt?rt,^Titf^**Ihe other side would not accept her arbitration, so that she would be unable to help her ". Elizabeth gradually slipped into the ELIZABETH AND MART'^:£JJART, .-" 105 position of judge, in spite of Mary's remonstrances; but she was going to do the best she could for Mary. Her intention was to have enough evidence produced to slightly justify the Lords and slightly inculpate Mary : then she would suggest a genial compromise, which would require her constant intervention to maintain. It was a difficult game to play, because both parties were to be deluded into putting themselves into Elizabeth's hands, on the supposition that she would favour them. As for a judicial inquiry into the circumstances of Darnley's murder, that was impos- sible in itself; and certainly no impartial tribunal could be constructed to try the case. Elizabeth put forward the inquiry as a necessary preliminary for her action, but neither party would agree to the inquiry till they knew what that action would be. So Elizabeth led Mary to suppose that she intended to restore her in Scotland, whatever happened, while she informed Murray that she did not mean to restore her if she were found guilty of the murder. She thus rendered it tolerably certain that evidence of Mary's ^ guilt would be produced. Then she nominated three Commissioners who were to meet the representatives of Mary and of the Scottish Lords at York. The Commissioners were fairly chosen to represent dif- ferent opinions in England. They were the Duke of Norfolk, the leader of the old nobility; the Earl of io6 QUEEN ELIZABETH. Sussex, a statesman of the old school ; and Sir Ralph Sadler, a capable ofBcial of the new type which had arisen under Henry VIII. When the Commissioners met at York, in October, Murray showed them privately some letters, purporting to have been dis- covered in a casket belonging to Mary, which incrim- inated her of devising with Bothwell the murder of Darnley. What was intended to be a political com- promise threatened to become a criminal trial, and Elizabeth had to consider what she would do. She dissolved the conference at York and summoned it to Westminster. She laid the evidence against Mary before a Council of the Peers. She added five, amongst them Leicester, Cecil and Bacon, to the number of the English Commissioners, who began a kind of private inquiry into Mary's guilt. When Mary protested against this jurisdiction, Murray was set up as the criminal and was required to prove his charge. The evidence was placed before a number of the English peers, who were of opinion that until some answer had been made, Elizabeth could not admit Mary to her pVesence. It is clear that Eliza- beth hoped by thus gradually tightening the coils of the net round Mary to induce her to admit her guilt, confirm her abdication, and allow James to be educated in England as successor to the English Crown. But Mary refused and Elizabeth was afraid to push matters to extremities. She stopped short ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 107 and left everything to the chance of the future. Murray was told that " nothing had been brought against the Lords which impaired their honour and allegiance " ; but also that nothing "had been suiB- ciently produced against the Queen, their Sovereign, whereby the Queen of England should take evil opinion of the Queen, her good sister". With this impotent conclusion the Conference ended. Elizabeth had failed in arranging matters, as she hoped, by an advantageous compromise on political grounds. Anything of the nature of a trial was out ~6i the question ; but, short of this, Mary's reputation had been damaged as far as it could be. For the present, she would remain in captivity in England, till some opportunity offered for sagacious action to which she might lend her name. Elizabeth had, by this time, contracted the habit of putting off un- pleasant business and leaving it undone. She had put off her own marriage and the settlement of the succession; the disposal of Mary of Scotland might conveniently be added to the list, as being cognate to them. Elizabeth was so accustomed to live from hand to mouth that her policy consisted in delay. She was willing to decide if the opportunity was favourable ; but the opportunity rarely offered all that she wanted. So she waited for a convenient season. If she had not restored Mary, at least she had not betrayed her. She had done enough to io8 QUEEN ELIZABETH. obtain general acquiescence to the important point that Mary ought not to be received at Court. Doubt- less, on this point, she recalled her own personal experiences in her young da3^s. Perhaps she felt a certain pleasure in facing the claim on her own dexterity, and was of opinion that she could manage Mary Stuart more skilfully than Mary Tudor had managed herself. She felt a perverse satisfaction in watching how things would turn out. There were, however, other dangers threatening Elizabeth. The Spanish troops of Alva were vic- torious in the Netherlands ; and Elizabeth could not flatter herself that Philip was her friend. She had tried his patience in many ways, as she discovered that he could not interfere in English affairs through fear that Mary Stuart would be a firm ally of France. Now that Mary's fortunes had waned, she would be a puppet in the hands of any one who acted as her deliverer. Philip had suffered much from England. It was of primary importance to him to have safe communication by sea between Spain and the Nether- lands ; and England, though at peace with him, was a constant source of annoyance at sea. During the last few years there had been a wonder- ful development of piracy, in which the energies of Englishmen found an outlet. England was passing through a social change in which agricultural pur- suits were sinking in importance before industry and ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 109 commerce. There was a displacement of population which opened out the way to adventure, and piracy became a profitable trade. The government naturalty wished for the growth of English seamanship and the command of the narrow seas. It winked at piracy as a temporary matter, till some better mode of > training seamen could be found. England could not afford a navy ; its fisheries were decaying, its carrying trade was not large. Good management might increase the occupation for Englishmen at sea ; meanwhile they must find their own occupation and they found it in piracy. Elizabeth was not sorry if Spain was the sufferer; she only washed to keep things within the limits of decency. This, however, was difficult, and complaints were many. At last, in 1564, Philip determined to give Elizabeth a lesson. Taking advantage of her war with France, he arrested all the English fleets in Spanish harbours and excluded English traders from the Flemish ports. This drove Elizabeth to apologise and to promise to do her utmost to suppress pirates. She ordered Sir Peter Carew to clear the seas between Devonshire and Ireland ; but he was to do it at his own expense and pay himself out of the booty which he could capture. This was not a profitable undertaking and little was done. A Commission met at Bruges to settle differ- ences between England and Spain ; but the English commissioners had nothing to urge in their defence. no QUEEN ELIZABETH. "Our men," they wrote, ** in their offences are so far out of all order, and the cases are so lamentable, if" the accounts be true, that we scant tell how to open our mouths for any reasonable satisfaction therein." Nor was it only in the Channel that Spain had to complain of English depredation. In the Spanish possessions in America it had been found that the native Indians were unsuited for labour in the mines, and negroes were brought from Africa to work in their stead. This traffic, however, was carefully regulated and was carried on under a licence from the Spanish Government. John Hawkins, however, discovered that a good business was to be done in smuggling negroes into the Spanish colonies contrary to the law. On his first voyage, half of his return cargo was seized and confiscated at Cadiz, and Elizabeth was admonished to prevent this illicit trading. However, Hawkins had learned wisdom by experience and was not discouraged. In his" second venture, Leicester, Pembroke, and even the Queen herself, are said to have taken shares. Hawkins sailed with his negroes to several Spanish ports and sold them in defiance of the Governor. He paid those who had taken shares in his undertaking 60 per cent., and was openly received at Court. In 1567 Hawkins sailed again, but this time his good fortune deserted him. As he lay in the harbour of ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. iii San Juan de Ulloa a Spanish fleet arrived and captured his ships, leaving him to escape with two small tenders, which made their way with difficulty to Plymouth Harbour in December, 1568. Now it chanced that, just at this time, there lay in the harbour ships laden with money for the Duke of Alva. Philip had borrowed from Genoese bankers and the dollars were divided, for greater safety, among several vessels, which were trying to escape the dangers of the Channel. Some of them had thought it prudent to take refuge in English harbours, so as to elude the pirates, and lay there in some anxiety, waiting a favourable opportunity to slip out un- perceived. Hawkins, smarting under his disaster, thirsted for revenge. He told his story in his own way: as Philip had robbed English subjects, the Queen might seize Philip's ships till recompense was made. The suggestion fitted in with political ex- pediency. Elizabeth was not prepared to help the Netherlanders in their revolt, but she was glad to check Alva's progress. He was anxiously waiting for money, and the loss of it would cripple him. So the ships were seized and the money was brought to London. Don Guerau d'Espes, the Spanish am- bassador, sought an explanation from the Queen, but it was a week before he could obtain an interview. Then Elizabeth told him that as she had need of a loan, she had found that the Genoese, to whom tne lia QUEEN ELIZABETH. money belonged, were willing to lend it to her instead of Philip. In vain the ambassador protested. She answered that the owners might lend where they chose ; if they preferred her security to that of Philip, no one could complain. To this outrageous conduct Alva replied by arresting all English residents in the Netherlands. Elizabeth retaliated by arresting the Flemings and Spaniards in England. It is true that England had the advantage in these reprisals ; but the interruption of trade caused discontent, and the prospect of war with Spain was serious. Elizabeth had to quiet matters by issuing a proclamation which tried to throw the blame on Spain. The money, she said, was the property of some merchants : its safe custody had been forced upon her ; she was considering if she might not borrow part of it, when Alva, without asking an explanation, laid violent hands on English ships and cargoes in the Netherlands, and had forced her to retaliate. However, Elizabeth and herCouncil were ashamed of their dishonest proceeding, and winced before the jests of the Spanish ambassador. He was confined to his house, and his correspondence was read. In a letter to a friend, he wrote : ** Do not be surprised to hear that I am arrested. In this island there are all the enchantments of Amadis, and I am a prisoner of Queen Oriana." Cecil's soul burned with wrath. The letter still remains with ELIZABETH AND MARY STUAkT. II3 his endorsement: "Against the Queen's Majesty Oriana". Don Guerau was told that "such vain fancies taken from Amadis of Gaul were unworthy of a person holding his office. He would be treated as a seditious, insolent person, unworthy to be admitted into the presence of a Prince." Don Guerau had the best of it, for he answered by expressing his surprise that the Council should have opened letters not addressed to them, and should have failed to understand their contents. He politely offered to send them a man "to whom the Spanish tongue is natural" that he might interpret his harmless jests. Cecil was placed at a disadvantage and nourished a grudge. It was, however, inevitable that this prospect of a Spanish war, joined to the excitement caused by the presence of Mary, should awaken great anxieties and should bring to light hidden sources of discontent. Elizabeth's attitude towards Spain was due to Cecil's advice. The old nobles looked on Cecil as an upstart, were jealous of his influence with the Queen and re- garded his policy as hazardous. Hitherto Elizabeth had tried a cautious compromise ; she had aimed above all things at keeping the country together ; she had been more anxious not to commit herself to any- thing that could cause discontent than to assume a definite position. It was natural for her advisers to wish for certainty : it was equally natural for 8 X 114 QUEEN ELIZABETH. Elizabeth to find her safety in cautious ambiguity, which she concealed under occasional outbursts of self-will in personal matters. But there must come a time when compromise must be tested, and iffering opinions surge against the barriers erected to keep them dowh. The result of the conference about Mary had shown that Elizabeth would not recognise her suc- cession. Yet there was no one else, and some arrangement must be made. Already, during the conference, a plan had been formed for Mary's marriage with the Duke of Norfolk, and this plan had the sympathy of a large party of the English nobles. By the side of this was a plan for the over- throw of Cecil, which was cordially supported by Leicester. We have an account of an incident which shows how things stood in the middle of February, 1569. The Queen was talking with Leicester and Cecil, at one end of the room, when Norfolk and several others were present. Elizabeth supported Cecil's opinion against Leicester, who angrily ex- claimed that her throne would never be safe till Cecil's head was off his shoulders. She raised her voice in passion and threatened to send Leicester to the Tower. Norfolk remarked to those standing with him that Leicester was in favour so long as he echoed Cecil, but was in danger if he had an opinion of his own. " But, by God," he added, *' this shall not be ; ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 115 Some remedy must be found for this." " Pray God, it may be so," said Lord Northampton, " I have ever wished it." Then Norfolk advanced to the Queen and said that when her anger was past, and she could reflect quietly on the state of the country, she would see the need of wiser counsel ; he and his friends would consider what ought to be done. Elizabeth swept out of the room in mingled wrath and dismay. To understand what followed, some account of the Duke of Norfolk's position is necessary. Thomas Howard was the son of the poet Earl of Surrey, who was beheaded by Henry VIH., and sprang of a house which had long claimed the chief place in England. He had added to his importance by a series of rich marriages. His first wife was the daughter of the Earl of Arundel, and his son by that marriage was heir to the Arundel domains. His second wife was similarly heiress of Lord Audley of Walden. His third wife was the widow of Lord Dacre of Gilsland, next to the Percies the most powerful of the nobles on the English Border. On her death, in 1567, Nor- folk was again a widower, at the age of thirty-one. It is no wonder that, after reaping such rich harvests from matrimony, it seemed to him that a kingdom was the only remaining dower which had not fallen to his lot. The suggestion that he should marry Mary came originally from the Scottish side, during the conference at York. Later, he had an interview ii6 QUEEN ELIZABETH. with Murray, who encouraged him to hope that the proposal would be laid before Elizabeth by an envoy from the Scottish Parliament. The general un- certainty in England and the desire to reverse Cecil's policy towards Spain drove many of the chief nobles to acquiesce in the plan as the wisest and safest course to pursue. ^ But there was one point in which Norfolk was weak, and Cecil soon discovered it. Norfolk was in debt, and could not afford to forego any personal ad- vantage. After the death of his last wife he obtained the wardship of her children by Lord Dacre. The only boy died in May, 1569 ; and Norfolk determined to marry the three daughters to his three sons, and so secure for his family the Dacre estates. Their title, however, was disputed by the last owner's brother, Leonard Dacre, who claimed as heir male, and was recognised as such in his neighbourhood. When Cecil discovered the conspiracy against him- self he offered Norfolk and Arundel full powers to go to Spain and settle the dispute with Philip ; but, at the same time, he offered ^rfolk his influence to have the lawsuit about the ll^cre inheritance settled in his favour. Norfolk accepted the offer, and a legal decision was given against Leonard Dacre on July ig. This had the effect of separating Norfolk from the northern Lords, who all sided with their neighbour Dacre. They were, moreover, strong adherents of the ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 117 Pope, and preferred a husband for Mary who would be decidedly on the Papal side. Hence parties were again divided. Norfolk fell back on Cecil and trusted to gain Elizabeth's consent to his marriage with Mary. The northern Lords plotted to carry off Mary and allow her to marry whomsoever the King of Spain suggested. Mary communicated with both parties, and was ready to accept whichever was successful. Norfolk's influence led the Council to vote, on August 27, for the settlement of the succession by the marriage of Mary to some English nobleman ; but he had not the courage to plead his own cause with Efizabeth. He proposed that the Council should wait upon her in a body and state their wishes. It is significant of the effect of Elizabeth's personality that they all declined, and Norfolk was too terrified to speak for himself. When he tried to do so " he fell into an ague and was fain to get him to bed with- out his dinner". Elizabeth was going on progress, and Norfolk followed her, trying to screw up courage to speak. On her side she endeavoured to lead him to the point. One morning, in the garden at Rich- mond, she called him and asked him what news. Norfolk said he knew of none. " None ? " said the Queen. " Yoi^\Come from London and can bring no news of a marrfage ? " A lady came up with some flowers, and Norfolk slunk away. Leicester pleaded for him j but Norfolk could not speak for himself, ii8 QUEEN ELIZABETH. The Queen grew weary, and one day, at dinner, "gave him a nip, bidding him to take care of his pillow ". In fact, she was anxiously waiting some assurance of Norfolk's fidelity to herself, and was doubting if she could trust him. She felt some alarm and told Leicester that " if she consented, she would be in the Tower before four months were over ". Norfolk was doubting if he should ask the Queen's consent or join the plan to rescue Mary by force. At last he could bear the suspense no longer, and on September 15 hastily left the Court. Elizabeth at once returned to Windsor, and sent the Earl of Hunt- ingdon, whom she could fully trust, to bring Mary to the safe keeping of the strong castle of Tutbury. It was now too late for a rising, and Norfolk could only advise the northern Earls that Mary was too securely guarded to be rescued. Then he wrote to Elizabeth that " he never intended to deal otherwise than he had her favour to do ". He withdrew to his house at Kenninghall, and when summoned to London pleaded illness. Leicester sent him a message, that if he continued disobedient he would be proclaimed a traitor. Having no settled policy and unable to face this threat, Norfolk returned to London and was confined to his house. Elizabeth wished to bring him to trial for treason, but Cecil interceded. He had taken th^ measure of Norfolk's character, and ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 119 wrote : ** Better marry him to somebody. Provide him with a wife and his hopes of the Scottish Queen will pass away." However, on October 8 Norfolk was committed to the Tower, and Elizabeth at first declared that she would have his head off by her own authority if the law could not condemn him. She was deeply moved by a sense of surrounding danger which she could not clearly discover. Nor- folk's conduct had impressed her with a sense of his disloyalty, and he had been supported by many whom she trusted, even by Leicester. Cecil was afraid to prosecute his inquiries too far, for he was anxiously watching the northern counties, where devotion to the old religion and to Mary's cause was strortgest. The Earls of Northumberland and West- moreland were at the head of a body of gentlemen who had been prepared to rise for Mary's rescue. They were furious at Norfolk's cowardice, and were waiting for another opportunity for action. They were carefully watched by the Earl of Sussex, who was President of the Council of the North ; and they felt that the inquiries about Norfolk would reveal their complicity. They received a summons to Lon- don, but sent thinly-veiled excuses. At last, on November 14, they threw off disguise, entered the city of Durham, took possession of the Cathedral, tore in pieces the English Bible and Prayer-Book, 9.nd celebrated Mass, Thence they marched south- I20 QUEEN ELIZABETH. wards, intending to release Mary from Tutbury ; but when they reached Tadcaster they found that Mary had been transferred to Coventry. They paused irresolutely, and as the country did not rise in their favour, withdrew northwards. This gave time for the Queen to gather forces ; and the rebel army, dis- mayed at the indecision of its leaders, gradually dispersed. At the end of November Northumberland and Westmoreland fled across the Border, where they found refuge in the trackless dales. There remained another conspirator, more danger- ous because he was more capable. Leonard Dacre had not taken part in the rising, but professed to hold the Castle of Naworth for the Queen. There he gathered arms and provisions, and was at the head of a formidable army of borderers amongst whom his name was held in high repute. Elizabeth ordered Sussex to send him to London j but Sussex ad- mitted that he was powerless. Luckily the Governor of Berwick, Henry Carey, Lord Hunsdon, was Eliza- beth's cousin, being the son of Anne Boleyn's sister. His assured fidelity gave him courage to undertake a perilous enterprise. When Dacre knew himself to be suspected he threw off the mask and summoned the Scottish borderers to his aid. Unless prompt action were taken the rising would break out again, on a larger scale and under a more competent com- mander. Hunsdon determined to attagk Naworth, ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. I2i if possible ; if not, to reinforce the garrison of Carlisle. Hastily collecting such forces as he could — they only amounted to 1500 men — he set out from Hexham by night on February 19, 1570. He soon found that he was marching through a hostile country. Beacons blazed on every hill, and every- where were heard the shouts of horsemen gathering for the fray. When he reached Naworth, at daybreak he found it strongly fortified and impregnable from its position. Dacre was expecting him with 3000 men. Not daring to give battle, he pursued his road to Carlisle. In front of him ran the little river Gelt, difficult to pass owing to its precipitous banks. Dacre pursued him, expecting to catch him in a trap, and charged as he stood hesitating by the cliffs, which cut off his advance. But Hunsdon's men stood firm, and fired with trained precision. The furious charge of the border horsemen was checked, and Hunsdon's cavalry fell upon them in the flank. Dacre lost courage and fled to Liddesdale ; his troops, deprived of a leader, rode for their homes. The battle of the Gelt is little known in military annals; but it deserves to rank high among the battles fought on English soil. Hunsdon was out- numbered two to one ; his position was dangerous ; and his men were wearied by a long night's march. His defeat would have been disastrous; the victory was due to his courage and skill, Elizabeth thanked 122 QUEEN ELIZABETH. him with a warmth that was unusual. " I doubt not, my Harry," she wrote with her own hand, "whether that the victory given me more joyed me, or that you were by God appointed the instrument of my glory. And I assure you that for my country's sake the first might suffice ; but, for my heart's contentation, the second more pleased me. It likes me not a little that, with a good testimony of your faith, there is seen a stout courage of your mind, that trusted more to the goodness of your quarrel than to the weakness of your numbers." Elizabeth had been thoroughly alarmed by this revolt, and, when her fear was over, she clamoured for vengeance. Not only was she incensed that any one should rebel against such an excellent Sovereign, but she sorely grudged the money which she had 'been compelled to spend in her own defence. Her desire was to strike terror into all, but to combine punishment with economy. Sussex was ordered to seize all who had been concerned in the rebellion. Those who had no land were to be dealt with by martial law ; a certain number were to be hanged at once on their village green, as a warning to their neighbours. Those who were possessed of land were to be tried, so that the Crown might have the advantage of the forfeitures which could follow on their conviction for treason. In accordance with these instructions, some 600 or 700 peasants ELIZABETH AND MARY STUART. 123 were hanged, whose only crime was that they had followed those whom they regarded as their leaders. The men with possessions were carefully tried ancj/ sentenced in such a way that the greatest pecuniary advantage might be obtained. Moreover, Elizabeth was ceaseless in her efforts to secure the Earls of Northumberland and Westmoreland that she might make certain of their attainder. Elizabeth was not naturally cruel and was gener- ally averse to bloodshed. But, on this occasion, she lost her self-control, and was heedless of the remonstrances of her ministers. Yet never was an occasion when magnanimity would better have be- fitted a Sovereign. The complete failure of the northern rising showed how firmly Elizabeth was seated on her throne. The crisis, which had been so long dreaded, came and passed harmlessly away. Europe had long supposed that Elizabeth ruled over England only on sufferance ; that the great majority of her people were opposed to her actions ; that if she was seriously challenged she would fall. The" challenge came, and only proved that Elizabeth possessed the affection and confidence of her people, i It was hopeless to overthrow her by a rebellion.-^ For that purpose, assassination or foreign invasion alone could avail, X24 CHAPTER IV. THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF ELIZABETH. Notwithstanding the failure of the rising of the north, it was an indication of the growing danger of EHzabeth's position. There was in England itself a party which was irreconcilably opposed to her rule, and was only waiting for an opportunity to overthrow it. The ground of its opposition was religious, and it called in question the title of Elizabeth as the legitimate holder of the Crown. If she was not the rightful Queen, she had no claim on the loyalty of her subjects ; it was their duty to depose her and set Mary Stuart in Iier stead. These were the ideas which lay behind the rising of the nOrth, It was the conception which animated that revolt which made it dangerous ; and the danger remained after the revolt had been put down. It was obvious from the beginning of Elizabeth's reign that such a party must exist ; but the questions to be decided were — how large that party would be, how much vitality it would possess, and what outside help it woulcj obtain, The decision depended on two THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF ELIZABETH. 125 things — the success of the religious settlement in England, and the fortunes of that other settlement which must soon be made by the Roman Church abroad. At Elizabeth's accession there was doubt on both these points; ten years later the doubt had been removed. Elizabeth was bound to confess that England was not united in religion, while the Church of Rome had removed some of its abuses, had strengthened its organisation, and had gathered round it a devoted body of adherents. It was, indeed, a difficult thing for England to settle down again into absolute unity in religion. The mass of the people were satisfied with the removal of those pressing and practical abuses which had been connected with the Roman jurisdiction. They welcomed the greater demand on their intelli- gence, and on their co-operation in public worship, which was made by the simplification of the old services. But the rapid changes under Edward VI. and Mary had necessarily lowered the efficiency of the body of the clergy. Men who live through rapid transitions either become violent partisans, or grow timorous, cynical, or indifferent The leaders on either side had been ejected in turns ; the clergy who remained were not men of strong character or much capacity. Moreover they were a diminishing body, and it was not always easy to replace them. Young men of promise might well hesitate, m the face of 126 QUEEN ELIZABETH. prevailing uncertainty, and turn to some other career than that of the priesthood. If the old clergy were indifferent, the younger clergy were often of little learning and of lowly birth. The benefices were mostly * poor, and the churches had suffered from excessive zeal in removing monuments of superstition. The services in parish churches were, as a rule, lacking in dignity; and as they were intelligible, their shortcomings were immediately perceptible. These, however, were temporary difficulties, which would soon have disappeared had the religious zeal of England been united. But the great majority of English theologians had been driven to leave England before the Marian persecution. Partly the natural resentment inspired by their wrongs led them to dislike the religious system in whose interest those wrongs were inflicted ; partly they took refuge for greater safety in the regions where the most advanced forms of Protestantism prevailed. The English exiles absorbed much of the theology of Calvin, and when they returned home were anxious to introduce it into England. They had no sympathy with the concep- tion which lay at the root of the changes made in the forms of the English Church — the acceptance of the results of the New Learning, the abolition of all usages which had grown up only through unreasoning sentiment and perverse ingenuity, and the mainten- ance of all that had existed in primitive times. They THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF ELIZABETH. 127 were men of a later generation, who had grown up in times of strife and were interested in finding weapons which could be wielded with effect, bulwarks which were strong against assault. The first genera- tion of reformers hopefully removed abuses, and trusted to general intelligence to understand the reasonableness of what was done. Their successors felt more keenly the force of the old system, which was interwoven with popular life and sentiment. They wished to sweep it away altogether, and set up in its stead a new theology, a new form of Church government and of public worship. , They thought that it must come to this in the long run, in England also ; and they wished to precipitate the decision. The number of the adherents of Calvin was not large, but it consisted of resolute and earnest men, who were intent on spreading their opinions. They had all the power which comes from zeal. They were strong in the Universities, where young men were affected by what seemed to them the advanced opinions which must rule the future. Some of the Bishops had strong sympathies with them, at least so far that they hesitated to silence men, whose Christian zeal was beyond dispute, in a time when zeal was not too common. Indeed the temper of Englishmen was opposed to any undue exercise of authority in matters of opinion. Men must be heard before they were condemned. It might be that laS QUEEN ELIZABETH. after a period of discussion things would settle them- selves. But all this gave an appearance of uncertainty to the system of the English Church. Many minds, Y which would have been contented after a while with T the Prayer-Book, paused to ask themselves what iN security they had that it would be maintained. They thought that they might soon be called upon to choose V between Rome and Geneva, and the attractions of / ^ the old system were more keenly felt at this prospect. J r The conflict which was raging on the Continent was y introduced into England. The English Church was strong enough to save the nation as a whole from "the horrors of religious warfare. It represented the religious feeling of the great majority of the people, and exercised a dominant influence over the future of England. But it was not permitted to include the entire people. There were formed two parties, one of which looked to Rome, and trusted to recover its ^ superiority by foreign help ; the other was determined to capture the English Church, and mould it by per- sistent energy into the forni which it preferred. ^~y/^o^ on the one hand, there were Englishmen who /went abroad, that they might move the Pope to ex- / communicate Elizabeth and declare war against a V^ heretical Queen. On the other hand, there were Englishmen who stayed at home and consulted Calvin how far they could conform to the English THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF ELIZABETH. 129 Prayer- Book, and what steps they were to take in the direction of further change. Both of these parties were dangerous to the national welfare, which re- quired, above all else, that England should be united and should give no opportunity for intervention in its affairs. But, for practical purposes, the danger lay in the direction of Rome, and it was judged necessary to take measures of defence. In the Parliament of 1562 an Act was passed for the ** Assurance of the Queen's Power over all Estates," making all who upheld the Pope's authority or jurisdiction liable to the penalties of praemunire, and requiring the oath of the royal supremacy to be taken by all who held office, lay or spiritual, in the realm. It is true that Archbishop Parker admonished his suffragans to proceed gently in administering the oath, and to overlook the older clergy, who, at least, were silent. But the Puritan clergy soon began a protest against ecclesiastical vestments. They would have neither surplice, hood, nor square cap. Clothes worn by Papists were like meat offered to idols : they were bound to abstain from all appearance of evil. The unfortunate legacy of fighting great principles over outward trifles was bequeathed to the English Church. Yet beneath all this unseemly discord was develop- ing that conception of liberty which has made the English character what it is. Obvious as are its drawbacks for the purposes of orderly arrangement, 9 I30 QUEEN ELIZABETH, it fostered a spirit of sincerity and self-respect which lie at the root of national character. The man who insists on thinking for himself, learns to act for himself, and gains a sense of duty and a regard for justice, on which the welfare of a community must ultimately depend. While England was thus engaged in raising questions which it has not yet succeeded in solving, Rome was engaged in casting overboard what could no longer be carried, and in forging its unwieldy system into compact strength for the purpose of aggression. The Council of Trent marks the divid- ing line between the mediaeval Church and modern Romanism. It collected scattered forces, revived ancient claims, and prepared to reconquer the^ realms that had been lost. In so doing, the Roman Church largely assimilated the spirit of the Spanish monarchy, and went forth with the one desire of putting down heresy by the sword and the stake. Hitherto the Papal attitude towards England had been uncertain. Now there was no longer room for doubt. It was a rebellious province which must be forcibly brought back to its allegiance. An implacable warfare was begun by Pope Pius V., which had the result of convincing Englishmen that the Papacy was the determined foe of all that England held most dear. [ It was in the sphere of politics, rather than of religion, \ that Protestantism was stamped into the English mind. THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF ELIZABETH. 131 The rising of the North was the result of this revival of Romanism. It seemed that Elizabeth's throne was doomed to fall before the forces which were gathering against it. The northern Earls, who were Romanists by conviction, thought that they could count upon Norfolk and his followers, who were ready to become Romanists through policy. That the movement failed so signally was due to Norfolk's vacillation, which robbed it of a pretext. A rising in favour of Norfolk's marriage with Mary might have been a plausible cry. When this was removed, the conspirators were at a loss for a definite statement of their objects. Westmoreland asked what the quarrel was to be, and was answered by a shout *' For religion ! " But he hesitated at the thought of undertaking the responsibility of introducing religious warfare into England. " Those," he said, " that seem to take that quarrel in other countries are counted as rebels; and I will never blot my name." The ques- tion then arose " whether by God's law they might wage battle against an anointed Prince, until he or she was lawfully excommunicated by the Head of the Church ". Englishmen could not plead that they rose against intolerable oppression ; and they were chary of admitting far-reaching principles which might recoil against themselves. Doubtless the knowledge of this uncertainty weighed in some degree with Pope Pius V., and I3a QUEEN ELIZABETH. induced him to proceed to the excommunication of Elizabeth. It was a step which had long been urged on the rapacy by English refugees, who wished to proceed to extremities. Let the Church do its duty ; then it would be seen who were on God's side. No harm could come of it, for the laws of England were merciful, and Parliament would not allow men to be put to death for their religion. So argued some of those who had presided over the fires of Smithfield. They were willing to use, for their own protection, the abhorrence of punishment for opinions which their own action had created in the breasts of Englishmen. But the Council of Trent did not feel strong enough to proceed openly against Elizabeth. The voice of politicians was against such a step when there were no means ready to give effect to the sentence. These motives of prudence did not weigh with the fiery and impetuous Pope Pius V., Michele Ghislieri, in whom the burning zeal of the sombre revival of Romanism was incarnated. His only thought was the recovery of the lost dominion of the Church, and its restoration to universal power. He was ready to expend all the treasures of the Church in a war against England. He dreamed of putting himself at the head of an expedition, and told some English refugees that he "wished he could pour out his blood for them". Without consulting the monarchs of his obedience, to know what help they would render, he issued a THE EXCOMMUNICATION OF ELIZABETH. 133 Bull declaring Elizabeth excommunicate, depriving her of her kingdom, absolving her people from their allegiance, and commanding them not to obey her commands or law^s. At first, this Bull was kept secret and was sent to the Cardinal of Lorraine in France for publication. On May 15, 1570, it was found nailed on the door of the Bishop of London's palace. Elizabeth had already answered this Bull by nlf^i^ anticipation. After the suppression of the rebellion ^f.>^>^fL/^ she had addressed her people in a remarkable mani- '**' festo in which she appealed to them to judge between her and the stirrers of sedition. Nothing is more characteristic of Elizabeth than the frankness of this appeal to her people's intelligence, her willingness to explain to all the principles which she strove to enforce. The rebellion, she wrote, has failed ; yet it is natural to consider why it happened. Partly it was due to the secret practices of malicious persons who played upon the fears of the northern Earls ; partly it was due to the groundless fear of severity in respect to religious opinions ; partly it gathered a vulgar herd who are always greedy of change. Yet the mass of the people stood firm, and she thanked them for their loyalty, in confirmation of which she wished to explain her past action and indicate her intentions about the future. *' We do all persons to understand, that of our own natural disposition, we ^*