< ! < ROM 1 1 STORY L-*^ *2tS\? .>- } AKT -KNIA )tEGO SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY, SELECTED AND EDITED WITH AN INTRODUCTION, (FROM THE ROMAN CONQUEST TO THE REVOLUTION OF 1688.) ARTHUR M. WHEELER, PROFESSOR OF HISTORY IN YALE COLLEGE. TWO PARTS IN ONE VOLUME. NEW YORK: PHILLIPS y the fact that, although they maintained all INTRODUCTION. 13 their high pretensions, they had ceased to perform conscientiously and fully the duties of their office. The English clergy stood as a body by itself, divorced from the nation, and owing allegiance pri- marily to a foreign power. The antagonism between Church and State in England had reached its limit. Henry now made use of this situation in order to accomplish his own objects and in his own way. But reckless as he was by nature, and intense as his personal interest was in the dispute with Pope Clement VII. over the divorce question, he moved forward slowly, and cautiously felt his way. More than six years elapsed after the divorce was first mooted, before final action was taken on his side. The succession of measures which severed the connection with Rome and broke up the monastic system in England met with sur- prisingly little opposition, and that was easily crushed. The nation looked on in silence while blow after blow was struck at the papal supremacy. The Parliament acquiesced in every thing, even in the most despotic measures of the king; its power seemed to be in abeyance. The new nobles, in fact, were entirely dependent on the sovereign; and, moreover, they were soon gorged with the plunder of the monasteries, and so were bound by the strongest tie, that of self-interest, to the new regime. The Commons, even if they wished to oppose, were too weak to do so ; they were apparently content to merely preserve the constitutional lotms out of which the spirit had temporarily vanished. Henry, however, made no important changes in the doctrines of the old Church. The ecclesiastical system which he established was simply " popery without the pope ; " or, rather, it was popery with himself as pope. He gave, indeed, the English Bible to his subjects, but he himself was to be its interpreter. As the creed of the prince so the creed of the people was a principle some- what widely accepted in those days ; but Henry was the first secular prince, and also the last, who arrogated to himself the sole right of shap- ing the creed. It was impossible that such a state of things should continue long. It was certain that the nation would either go forward or go back. Though the king arranged in his will to perpetuate his system, the will was broken before he was in his grave. Under his son doctrinal changes followed each other in quick succession. Un- der his daughter Mary the nation swung back, for a brief period, to the old faith ; it had not yet fully made up its mind. But under Eliz- abeth it again moved onward, and within a year after her accession the new creed assumed definite shape, and the Church of England was separated, forever, as it proved, from the Church of Rome. The English Church was now the State Church, established by law, and, in theory, the whole nation was included in it ; but, in fact, the Catholics, who still composed nearly half of the nation, already stood outside of it ; and within it there was a small, but growing, opposi- tion party the later Puritans who advocated still further change. Between these two extremes the government of Elizabeth attempted 14 INTRODUCTION. to steer a middle course, and to make the Catholics and Puritans con- form to the established system. The principle of toleration was then acknowledged by no sect or party. The mediaeval, idea that Church and State were inseparable, that those who stood outside of the one stood outside of the other, and were, therefore, not only heretics, but also rebels and traitors, was still preValent in the minds of men. In attempting to enforce conformity, the ministers of Elizabeth were acting in accordance with the accepted ideas of the age. But neither the English Catholics nor the Church of Rome were inclined to accept the situation and give up the struggle. They still hoped that England might yet be recovered to the papal see, and the temptation to undertake its recovery was well-nigh irresistible. Elizabeth stood alone, the last of her race in the direct line. In the eyes of the Cath- olics her title was worthless. They regarded her Catholic rival, Mary Stuart, as the rightful queen. To dethrone Elizabeth and put Mary in her place seemed to them simple and feasible, and the most direct way to secure the restoration of Catholicism in England. The personal rivalry between the two queens soon divided the nation, and ultimately broadened out into a struggle between Protestant England and Catholic Europe, a struggle which was brought to a close by the execution of Mary and the defeat of the Armada. Meanwhile the Puritans had been increasing in numbers and influ- ence. They did not at first propose to go out of the established Church, but, remaining in it, to introduce a simpler and, in their view, a purer form of worship. Possibly, if a few concessions as to out- ward forms and ceremonies had been promptly made, a schism might have been prevented. But the government showed an uncompro- mising spirit, and the Puritans passed from outward forms to attack the very basis of the established Church. They denied the right of the State to coerce in matters of religion. They formed separate assemblies, and at length organized separate Churches, worshiping in their own way, and growing apace in spite of penal laws. They began to appear in considerable numbers in the House of Commons, and their influence in that body was relatively all the greater because the Catholics had already been, by law, excluded from it. Since the days of Henry VIII. the Commons had been gradually recovering their lost prestige and power. Their growing importance is evi- denced by the various devices to which the government resorted to keep them under control. The Puritan element added largely to their strength, for the Puritans, unlike the Anglicans, thoroughly believed in the right and duty of resisting the encroachments of arbitrary power. They often came into collision with Elizabeth, but she never allowed a quarrel to go too far; her unerring tact told her when and how to yield. Above all, she never challenged them to a combat over the disputed ground. Moreover, she was greatly beloved, and the Commons themselves, now that she was growing old, were not inclined to force her hand. But they stood ready, as soon as the INTRODUCTION. 15 grave closed over her, to assert and maintain their rights and privi- leges against her successor. James met the Commons with the peculiarly Stuart doctrine of the divine right of kings. That doctrine was the cardinal point in his political creed. He also firmly believed that the Established Church was an indispensable support of the monarchy. " No bishop, no king," was his favorite saying. He told the Puritan clergy that they must conform, or he would harry them out of the land. He told the Commons that his prerogative was above the law, and could not be touched ; that their so-called rights and privileges were merely mat- ters of grace, conceded to them by former sovereigns, and revocable at his pleasure. He forbade them to meddle with affairs of state, as these were matters too high for their comprehension. He presumed to tax the country without the authority of Parliament, and he pur- sued a foreign policy which he knew to be highly distasteful to the nation. By dismissing Chief-Justice Coke, the greatest lawyer of his day, from his high position, because he showed a spirit of independ- ence, he taught the judges that he would brook no opposition from them. He silenced the bar by imprisoning some of its most promi- nent members, and he alienated the House of Lords, which had regained a portion of its earlier power, by a wanton attack upon its rights. And withal, in sharp contrast with his lofty pretensions and arbitrary acts, he was defective in body and mind, lacking in courage, low in his tastes, and thoroughly unkingly in all his ways. Among all the natural and constitutional barriers which then existed against the power of the crown the church, the bench, the bar, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons the last was the only one that had both the ability and the inclinaiion to offer any effectual resistance. The Commons met the encroachments of James with becoming spirit ; they protested in firm, but temperate, language, and in a thoroughly loyal tone, against his violations of their privileges and of the rights of the nation. They successfully asserted their right to withhold grants of money until grievances were redressed ; they impeached two of his ministers; and in other points they man- aged to hold their own against James. But in his son, Charles I., they had to deal with a far more dangerous antagonist. In him they found a man who, though conscientious in private life, was, in all his public acts, and especially in his dealings with his Parliaments, false to the core; who was capable of making a solemn public promise, of putting his name to a statute, without any realizing sense of the moral obligation thus assumed. They found it impossible to control such a king by strictly constitutional means ; and, as he persisted in his arbitrary courses, and, as the conflict between him and them developed, they were fairly forced to encroach on his lawful preroga- tive, to make him harmless by depriving him even of those powers which a constitutional king ought to wield. In the first three Parlia- ments of the reign which were called, quarreled with, and dissolved in 16 INTRODUCTION. quick succession, and in the fourth, which came together after a long interval of arbitrary power, the Commons presented a united front against the king. Even in the famous Long Parliament itself, which met when the situation was already revolutionary, they at first stood to- gether as one man in the assertion of their rights. The attainder of Strafforcl (May, 1641) was the first measure on which the House divided, and on that there was only a small minority in favor of the earl. But from this time on, the minority steadily increased. In revolutions, men and parties are generally driven beyond the goal at which they originally aimed. In this revolution the Commons had started with the idea of compelling the king to exerci.se his sovereign power within constitutional limits, and now, whether they were, distinctly conscious of it or not, they were, in reality, seeking to transfer the sovereign power to themselves. This they regarded as the only way in which they could secure the nation's liberties against such an inveterate cozener as Charles. They had already shorn him of much of his prerogative, and when they now proceeded to take away the rest, and make him a king merely in name, many of those who had hitherto acted with them drew back. Some were moved to pity by his delenseless condition ; others were sincerely attached to the established Church, whose very existence was threatened by the Puri- tan party ; others still were actuated by a feeling of loyalty to the reigning house. And so, as the dispute drifted into civil war, nearly half of the Parliament and of the nation sided with the king. On the parliamentary side the war was, at first, conducted in a lame and spiritless way. The Presbyterians, who were the conserva- tive wing of the Puritan party, predominated both in the House of Commons and in the army. They, in union with the Scots, wished to establish their own religious system in place of Anglicanism, and to beat the king just enough to bring him to their own terms, but, in no case, to depose him or overthrow the monarchy. The Independ- ents, on the other hand, who were the radical Puritans, believed in religious toleration and in the right of each separate congregation to organize itself in its own way; and they were ready, in case of ne- cessity, to get rid of Charles and of the monarchy as well. The wonderful success of their leader, Oliver Cromwell, and of his famous cavalry, the Ironsides, soon brought them to the front. They got control of the army, reorganized it, under Fairfax and Cromwell, in accordance with their own ideas, and practically ended the war by their great victory over the king's forces at Naseby (1645). The king took refuge with the Scots (May, 1646). The Scots, tailing to convert him to Presbyterianism, delivered him over to the English Presbyterians (January, 1647), and a little later he was seized by the army (June, 1647). The Presbyterians, who were still a majority in the Parliament, thereupon attempted to get rid of the army by dis- banding it ; and the army, refusing to disband until it had secured the great object for which it had entered the war, liberty of con- INTRODUCTION. 17 science, marched upon London, and expelled from the Parliament some of the obnoxious Presbyterian leaders. Thus the independ- ence of the Parliament was destroyed. The army leaders, with Cromwell at the head, now made an hon- est, but ineffectual, attempt to come to terms with the king. Charles intrigued with all parties, and was false toward all. His intrigues, however, soon led to a combination between the Scots and the En- glish Presbyterians and royalists against the Independent army, and the result was a renewal of the civil war (1648). Before marching out to battle the army resolved, in case it should be successful in sup- pressing this new movement, to call " Charles Stuart, that man of blood," to a strict account for his misdeeds. The combination was speedily crushed, and the army at once proceeded to bring the king to justice. It weeded out the Presbyterians from the Parliament, leaving "the Rump," which was composed entirely of Independents. That body established an extraordinary tribunal which tried and con- demned the king ; it voted the House of Lords to be useless, declared that all power rested with the Commons, abolished the monarchy, and set up a republic or commonwealth in its place. But the situation of the new government was exceedingly precari- ous. Nine tenths of the English people were opposed to it, Ireland and Scotland rejected it altogether, while abroad it encountered at once the bitter hostility of foreign powers. It owed its existence en- tirely to the army, and by the army alone it could be maintained. The task of establishing firmly its authority was intrusted to Crom- well. His brilliant campaigns in Ireland (1649) and Scotland (1650) reduced those countries to obedience, and made organized resistance in England impossible. At the same time they made him predomi- nant in the new commonwealth, and he now used his great influence in trying to bring the country back as speedily as possible to a con- stitutional basis. He wanted a new Parliament, freely chosen, which should represent the three nations ; he wanted reforms in the law and in the Church ; and, above all, he wanted liberty of conscience. The Rump Parliament, on the other hand, already distrustful of the suc- cessful general and fearing a military dictatorship, sought to perpet- uate its own power; and when it refused to fix a limit to its ses- sions, Cromwell drove it out (April, 1653). He then called a con- vention, composed of prominent men of his own party, to whom he intrusted the work of reconstructing the government. After a few months of trial, they resigned their authority back into his hands, and a Protectorate was established with him at the head (December, 1653). In a constitution which was drawn up, his power was limited by a council and a Parliament. Cromwell earnestly strove to rule within the limits imposed, and to prevent his government from degenerating into a military despotism. But he met with opposition on every side ; many of his own party distrusted him ; the new Parliament refused to recognize his authority, and had to be dissolved ; the royalists and i8 INTRODUCTION. radicals intrigued against him ; and he was forced, for a time, to rule as a despot. Yet his despotism was of a different kind from that of Charles. Cromwell userl his power for the good of the nation, not for the destruction of its liberties, By his brilliant foreign policy he made the influence of England in Europe far greater than it had ever been before. The energy and ability he displayed surprised and daz- zled even his enemies. A part of the nation, at last, began to real- ize, in some degree, at least, the inestimable value of the man as a ruler. A new constitution was drawn up, making him protector for life, and empowering him to name his successor. A new Parliament was called, and it seemed for the moment as if harmony would be re- stored, as if Parliament would become reconciled with Protectorate, and the proper limits of power be assigned to each. Many of the leading men of the nation urged Cromwell to take the title of king, but this he refused out of deference to the feelings of the army. In other matters, however, he complied with the wishes of those who were trying to work back to the forms of the old constitution. But the temporary harmony was destroyed by the establishment of a new House of Lords, a measure which aroused strong opposition among the well-meaning, but fanatical, republicans of the Lower House, and Cromwell was forced to dissolve this his last Parliament. His power still rested on the support of the army, and all his efforts to secure for it a legal and constitutional basis proved unavailing. For a few months alter his death, the different factions were held in awe by the influence of his name ; then party spirit broke forth, and, after a brief interval of chaos, the mass of the nation hastened with feverish anxi- ety to welcome back the returning Stuarts. The Restoration was followed by a period of degradation without a parallel in the nation's history. In the earlier years of the reign of Charles the Second the reaction against Puritan England was ex- treme ; the men and the measures of the commonwealth and of the protectorate were cast aside ; even the Presbyterians, who had helped to restore the monarchy, were subjected to a bitter persecution. The royal palace was little better than a brothel. Every thing that sa- vored of morality was laughed at. The literature of the day, with some noble exceptions, reeked with sensuality. The Church, content with her recovered wealth, made little effort to stem the tide of cor- ruption. The government was brought, by the royal extravagance, to the verge of bankruptcy. The Parliament was subservient, and pandered to the vices of the sovereign. The king became the tool and pensioner of France. Both he and his ministers seemed alike destitute of political honor. The influence of England abroad, which had been so great in Cromwell's time, was almost annihilated, and important changes, directly affecting her interests, went forward on the Continent with as little regard for her as if she had been blotted from the map of Europe. But the reaction gradually spent its force, and then it appeared that the work of Cromwell and his associates INTRODUCTION. 19 had not been done in vain. Slowly, but surely, an opposition to the prevailing regime arose and grew both in the Parliament and in the nation. Jt culminated in the formation of the great Whig party (1679), while the supporters of the king took the name of Tories. The Whigs were temporarily overthrown in consequence of the fac- tious spirit of their leaders in fomenting the Popish Plot and in trying to exclude the popish duke of York, later James the Second, from the succession to the crown. But they rose again under James, and when that monarch attempted to subvert the laws by means of a standing army, a packed bench of judges, and a packed House of Commons, Whigs and Tories united in inviting William, prince of Orange, to invade the country and assist in restoring the ancient liberties of the nation. Soon after William's landing James, deserted by all parties, fled to France, and the Convention Parliament, which was called, de- clared that he had abdicated, and elected William and Mary to fill the vacant throne. The Declaration of Right, which took the form of a statute in the Bill of Rights, fixed in definite terms the relations between king and Parliament and between Parliament and the peo- ple ; and a later statute, the Act of Settlement (1700), "made the English sovereign as much the creature of an act of Parliament as the pettiest tax-gatherer in his realm." Thus the revolution of 1688 was accomplished, " the least violent and the most beneficent of all revolutions." The result of causes which had been in operation for centuries, it definitely established the leading principles of the constitution, both in theory and in practice. The change of sovereign was one of the lesser benefits it conferred. It swept away forever, besides much other political rubbish, the doc- trines of the divine right of kings, of absolute royal authority, and of the passive obedience of the subject, which had so long obstructed constitutional progress. It transferred the paramount authority in .the State from the king to the House of Commons, and gave the nation guarantees of liberty so simple, broad, and strong that they could neither be evaded nor revoked. It fitly closed a long era of constitutional struggle, and at the same time prepared the way for a new development. YALE COLLEGE, May 29, 1886. 20 CONTENTS. CONTENTS. PART I. PAOE I. THE ROMAN OCCUPATION. Green 25 II. THE ENGLISH CONQUE;T AND SETTLEMENT. Gardiner. . . 30 III. CONVERSION OF THE ENGLISH. Milman 35 IV. THE EARLY MONASTERIES. Allen 40 V. ALFRED'S EARLY YEARS. Freeman 44 VI. DUNSTAN, THE ECCLESIASTICAL STATESMAN. Green 51 VII. CNUT, THE GREAT DANISH KING. Freeman 57 VIII. THE CLERGY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES. Stevenson. . 61 IX. BATTLE OF SENLAC OR HASTINGS. Freeman 67 X. THE CONQUEROR AND HIS POLICY. Green 72 XI. THE RED KING. Hunt 77 XII. HENRY I., THE SCHOLAR-KING. Pearson 82 XIII. THE ASSASSINATION OF BECKET. Milman 86 XIV. DEATH OF HENRY II. Stubbs 92 XV. How THE GREAT CHARTER WAS WON. Pearson 96 XVI. DEATH OF KING JOHN. Pearson 100 XVII. ENGLAND IN THE ISTH CENTURY. Longman 103 XVIII. THE MENDICANT FRIARS. Geikie 109 XIX. DEATH OF DE MONTFORT. Gardiner. 116 XX. WALLACE, THE SCOTCH PATRIOT. Pearson 121 XXI. BRUCE AND BANNOCKBURN. Longman 126 XXII. BATTLE OF CRECY. Froissart 134 XXIII. THE BLACK DEATH. Wat-burton 140 XXIV. JOHN WYCLIF. Shirley 144 XXV. DEPOSITION OF RICHARD II. York Powell 149 XXVI. BATTLE OF AZINCOURT. Martin 154 XXVII. JEANNE DARC. Guest 161 XXVIII. WARS OF THE ROSES. Guest 166 XXIX. BOSWORTH FIELD. Gairdner 176 CONTENTS. 21 PART II. PACK XXX. THE CARDINAL'S LAST JOURNEY. Brewer 183 XXXI. THE ENGLISH TERROR. Green 190 XXXII. A HOLY MISSION. Ewald 195 XXXIII. CHARACTER AND POLICY OF ELIZABETH. Green 200 XXXIV. EXECUTION OF MARY STUART. Fronde 206 XXXV. ARRIVAL OF THE ARMADA. Ewald 213 XX XVI. SIR WALTER RALEIGH. Farrar 220 XXXVII. GATHERING OF THE STORM. Ewald 226 XXXVIII. TRIAL OF STRAFFORD. Mozley 232 XXXIX. ATTEMPT TO ARREST THE FIVE MEMBERS. Gardiner. . 237 XL. EXECUTION OF CHARLES THE FIRST. Guizot 244 XLI. THE DECISION AT WORCESTER. Forster 250 XLII. DISSOLUTION OF THE LONG PARLIAMENT. Gardiner. . 256 XLIII. LAST DAYS OF CROMWELL. Masson 260 XLIV. THE RESTORATION. Guizot 267 XLV. EXECUTION OF MONMOUTH. Macaulay 272 XLVI. EXIT JAMES THE SECOND. Cooke 278 XLVII. KlLLIECRANKIE. Scott 282 XLVIII. DOWNFALL OF MARLBOROUGH. Lecky 286 XLIX. WALPOLE AS A PEACE MINISTER. Green 294 L. THE PREACHING OF WHITEFIELD. Lecky 298 LI. AFTER CULLODEN. Stanhope 305 LII. PITT AS A WAR MINISTER. Macaulay 311 LIU. AN EMPIRE WON IN THE EAST Macaulay 318 LIV. AN EMPIRE LOST IN THE WEST. Stanhope 324 LV. THE TERRIBLE PENAL CODE. Lecky 330 LVI. IMPEACHMENT OF HASTINGS. Macaulay 335 LVII. TRAFALGAR DEATH OF NELSON. Southey 341 LVIII. BOMBARDMENT OF COPENHAGEN. Fyffe 347 LIX. BATTLE OF WATERLOO. Creasy 351 LX. CORONATION OF QUEEN VICTORIA. Gremlle 356 LXI. BATTLE OF THE ALMA. McCarthy 360 LXII. THE STORY OF CAWNPORE. Kaye 366 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES . . 370 ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE ALFRED IN THE HERDSMAN'S HUT 50 ST. DUNSTAN 53 PLAN OF THE BATTLE OF BANNOCKBURN 129 L.UTTERWORTH WYCLIF'S ClIURCH 147 RICHARD II 149 EDWARD IV 166 RICHARD III 176 CHAPEL AND TOMB OF HENRY VII 1 8 1 HENRY VIII 185 QUEEN ELIZABETH 200 EXECUTION OF KING CHARLES 1 248 OLIVER CROMWELL 261 JAMES II 278 GEORGE 1 294 GEORGE III 324 DUKE OF WELLINGTON 351 PART I SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY, I* THE ROMAN OCCUPATION. GREEN. [At the time of Caesar's invasion of Britain, B.C. 55, the land was inhab- ited by the Celts, who were members of the great Aryan family of nations to which the Romans themselves belonged. The natives were in a semi- barbarous condition, and, though they fought bravely for their homes, were no match for the trained legions of the Empire. Caesar himself made no systematic attempt to subjugate the island ; but about a hundred years after him the work of conquest was begun in earnest and pushed steadily until all the country south of the Forth had submitted to the Roman arms. Britain remained a province of the Empire for three hundred and fifty years.] THE island of Britain was the latest of Rome's conquests in the west. Though it had been twice attacked by Julius Caesar, his withdrawal and the inaction of the earlier emperors promised it a continued freedom ; but a hundred years after Caesar's landing, Claudius undertook its conquest, and so swiftly was the work carried out by his generals, and those of his successors, that before thirty years were over, the bulk of the country had passed beneath the Roman sway. The island was thus fortunate in the moment of its conquest. It was spared the pillage and exactions which ruined the prov- inces of Rome under the Republic, while it felt little of the evils which still clung to their administration under the ear- lier Empire. The age in which its organization was actively carried out was the age of the Antonines, when the provinces 2 26 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. became objects of special care on the part of the central gov- ernment, and when the efforts of its administration were aided by peace without and a profound tranquillity within. The absence of all record of the change indicates the quietness and ease with which Britain was transformed into a Roman province. A census and a land-survey must have formed here, as elsewhere, indispensable preliminaries for the exac- tions of the poll-tax and the land-tax, which were the main burdens of Rome's fiscal system. Within the province the population would, in accordance with her invariable policy, be disarmed ; while a force of three legions was stationed, partly in the north to guard against the unconquered Britons, and partly in the west to watch over the tribes which still remained half-subdued. Though the towns were left in some measure to their own self-government, the bulk of the island seems to have been ruled by military and financial administrators, whose powers were practically unlimited. But, rough as their rule may have been, it secured peace and good order ; and peace and good order were all that was needed to insure material development. This development soon made itself felt. Commerce sprang up in the ports of Britain. Its har- vests became so abundant that it was able at need to supply the necessities of Gaul. Tin mines were worked in Corn- wall, lead mines in Somerset and Northumberland, and iron mines in the Forest of Dean. The villas and homesteads which, as the spade of our archaeologists prove, lay scattered over the whole face of the country, show the general prosper- ity of the island. The extension of its road system, and the upgrowth of its towns, tell above all how rapidly Britain was incorporated into the general body of the empire. It is easy, however, to exag- gerate the civilization of Britain. Even within the province south of the firths the evidence of inscriptions shows that large tracts of country lay practically outside the Roman life. Though no district was richer or more peopled than the THE ROMAN OCCUPATION. 27 south-west, our Devonshire and our Cornwall seem to have remained almost wholly Celtic. Wales was never really Romanized ; its tribes were held in check by the legionaries at Chester and Caerleon, but as late as the beginning of the third century they called for repression from the Emperor Severus as much as the Picts. The valleys of the Thames and of the Severn were fairly inhabited, but there are fewer proofs of Roman settlement in the valley of the Trent; and, though the southern part of Yorkshire was rich and populous, Northern Britain, as a whole, was little touched by the new civilization. And even in the south this civilization can have had but little depth or vitality. Large and important as were some of its towns, hardly any inscriptions have been found to tell of the presence of a vigorous municipal life. Unlike its neighbor, Gaul, Britain contributed nothing to the intellect- ual riches of the empire ; and not one of the poets or rheto- ricians of the time is of British origin. Even moral move- ments found little foothold in the island. When Christianity became the religion of the empire, under the house of Con- stantine, Britain must have become nominally Christian ; and the presence of British bishops at ecclesiastical councils is enough to prove that its Christianity was organized in the ordinary form. But as yet no Christian inscription or orna- ment has been found in any remains of earlier date than the close of the Roman rule; and the undoubted existence of churches at such places as Canterbury, or London, or St. Albans, only gives greater weight to the fact that no trace of such buildings has been found in the sites of other cities which have been laid open by archreological research. Far, indeed, as was Britain from the center of the em- pire, had the Roman energy wielded its full force in the island it would have Romanized Britain as completely as it Romanized the bulk of Gaul. But there was little in the province to urge Rome to such an effort. It was not only the most distant of her western provinces, but it had little natural 28 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. wealth, and it was vexed by a ceaseless border warfare with the unconquered Britons, the Picts, or Caledonians, beyond the northern firths. There was little in its material resources to tempt men to that immigration from the older provinces of the empire which was the main agent in civilizing a new con- quest. On the contrary, the harshness of a climate that knew neither olive nor vine deterred men of the south from such a settlement.. The care with which every villa is furnished with its elaborate system of hot-air flues shows that the cli- mate of Britain was as intolerable to the Roman provincial as that of India, in spite of punkahs and verandas, is to the English civilian or the English planter. The result was that the province remained a mere military department of the empire. It is a significant fact that the bulk of the monu- ments which have been found in Britain relate to military life. Its inscriptions on tombs are mostly those of soldiers. Its mightiest work was the great wall and line of legionary stations which guarded the province from the Picts. Its only historic records are records of border forays against the barbarians. It was not merely its distance from the seat of rule, or the later date of its conquest that hindered the province from pass- ing completely into the general body of the empire. Its phys- ical and its social circumstances offered yet greater obstacles to any effectual civilization. In spite of its roads, its towns, and its mining works, it remained, even at the close of the Roman rule, an " isle of blowing woodland," a wild and half-reclaimed country, the bulk of whose surface was occupied by forest and waste. The rich and lower soil of the river valleys, in- deed, what is now the favorite home of agriculture, had, in the earliest times, been densely covered with primaeval scrub ; and the only open spaces were those whose nature fitted them less for the growth of trees, the chalk downs and oolitic uplands that stretched in long lines across the face of Britain from the Channel to the Northern Sea. It is mainly in the natural THE ROMAN OCCUPATION. 29 clearings of the uplands that the population concentrated itself at the close of the Roman rule, and it is over these districts that the ruins of the villas or country houses of the Roman land-owner are most thickly scattered. The cities of the province were, indeed, thoroughly Romanized. Within the walls of towns such as Lincoln or York, towns governed by their own municipal officers guarded by massive walls, and linked together by the net- work of roads which reached from one end of the island to the other, law, language, political and social life, all were of Rome. But if the towns were thoroughly Romanized, it seems doubtful, from the few facts that remain to us, whether Ro- man civilization had made much impression on the bulk of the provincials, or whether the serf-like husbandmen, whose cab- ins clustered round the luxurious villas of the provincial land-owners, or the yet more servile miners of Northumbria, and the Forest of Dean, were touched by the arts and knowl- edge of their masters. The use of the Roman language may be roughly taken as marking the progress of the Roman civ- ilization; and, though Latin had all but wholly superseded the languages of the conquered peoples in Spain and Gaul, its use was probably limited in Britain to the townsfolk, and to the wealthier proprietors without the towns. Over large tracts of country the rural Britons seem to have remained apart from their conquerors, not only speaking their own language, and owning some traditional allegiance to their native chiefs, but retaining their native system of law. Im- perial edicts had long since extended Roman citizenship to every dweller within the empire; but the wilder provincials may have been suffered to retain in some measure their own usages, as the Zulu or Maori is suffered to retain them, though subject in theory to British law, and entitled to the full privi- leges of British subjects. The Welsh laws, which we possess in a later shape, are undoubtedly, in the main, the same system of early customs which Rome found existing among the Britons 30 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. in the days of Claudius and Caesar; and the fact that they remained a living law when her legions withdrew proves their continuance throughout the four hundred years of her rule, as it proves the practical isolation from Roman life and Roman civilization of the native communities which preserved them. II. THE ENGLISH CONQUEST AND SETTLEMENT. GARDINER. [At the beginning of the fifth century the Roman Empire was in a state of dissolution. The barbarian tribes had broken into it in many directions, and in 410 the Goths, under Alaric, took and sacked Rome itself. In the following year the government, needing all its available forces at home, withdrew its army of occupation from Britain. The Britons, thus left to themselves, remained nominally independent for sixty years. But, accus- tomed as they had so long been to imperial protection, they were unable to defend themselves. They were attacked from the north by the Picts and Scots, who had never been brought under the Roman sway, as well as by the Teutonic or German pirates from the south. The latter they in- vited to assist them against their northern enemies. Quarrels arose be- tween them and their allies. The Teutons, among whom the Angles pre- dominated, came in ever-increasing numbers. The natives made a des- perate resistance. The struggle lasted a hundred and fifty years. At the end of that period the invaders had succeeded in establishing ten or twelve petty kingdoms on the soil of Britain.] WHEN, in the middle of the fifth century, our Teutonic ancestors landed on the shores of Britain, they carved out settlements for themselves ; they were Jutes and Saxons and Angles from the coast which stretches from Jutland to the mouths of the Elbe and Weser. Over the horror of the struggle a thick darkness has settled down, and, with the exception of one lightning-flash from a Celtic writer, it was only by its leading features, by a battle or a siege traditional- ly remembered, that any portion of it could be recovered when civilization and its power of recording events again spread over the land. At the end of a century and a half the Teu- THE ENGLISH CONQUEST AND SETTLEMENT. 31 tonic settlers occupied the whole of the eastern half of the land, from the Forth to the Straits of Dover, and from the coast of the German Ocean to the Severn. Over all this tract the Low German speech of the invaders was to be heard. To what extent the British population had disap- peared is a matter of controversy. It is a point on which no certain knowledge is attainable. The invaders did not enter the island impressed with the dignity of Roman civilization. They knew nothing of the Roman speech. They seized upon the lands of the Britons. They stormed and sacked their cities. They probably carried off their daughters to be their wives or concubines. The men who resisted were slain as wild beasts are slain, without thought of mercy. Of the rest, some were reduced to slavery, some may have kept up a precarious independence in the woods. Under such circumstances a population suffers fearful diminution from misery and starvation. The weak and the old, with the young child, the hope of future generations, perish for lack of food. Yet, whatever the numerical amount of the survivors may have been, the general result is certain. The Teutonic speech, save in a few words used principally by women and slaves, prevailed every-where. The Teutonic law, the Teu- tonic way of life, was the rule of the land. The Teutonic heathenism was unchanged. The Celtic element, whether it was larger or smaller, was absorbed, and left scarcely a trace behind. If the history of the settlement is to be gathered from scanty tradition, the character and institutions of the settlers have to be inferred from that which is known of them in their own land, and from that which is known of them later in the land of their adoption. Fierce and masterful as they were, they were not barbarians, except in antithesis to the civilization of Rome. The stage which they had reached was very much that of the Homeric Greeks, if we allow for the greater inclemency of a northern sky. Each tribe was 32 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. complete in itself. It had its own assembly of freemen, whose voice was decisive in regulating its actions. At its head was a chief, the ealdorman, as he .was named, who guided its deliberations, and who, after its arrival in England at least, headed it in war. The freemen themselves were composed of two ranks, eorls and ceorls. The eorls, or no- bles by birth, whose origin is lost in the mists of the past, had an honorary pre-eminence. Their voice was of greate' weight, their life was of greater value, their share of booty larger. But they did not make the State, though they had, doubtless, much to do with its direction. In fact, there was nothing that we should now call political life in existence. New legislation there was none. The old customs, handed down from father to son in Germany, were adhered to in En- gland, and the only question which could arise for delibera- tion was whether some new expedition should be undertaken against the enemy. Outside the assembly, as well as within it, all freemen were equal, however much they might differ in influence or wealth. Each man had his own share of the conquered land, and his share of pasturage or wood-cutting in the folkland the common land that had been left undi- vided. The organization of which he formed a part did not, as in the empire, reach from the State to the individual, but from the individual to the State. Each township which, in an ecclesiastical form, became the parish of modern days, made its appearance once a month, in the hundred mote, to decide quarrels and to witness contracts ; while the members of the tribe met twice a year to decide matters of more gen- eral importance. As every man was a judge unless, in- deed, the practice of attending the hundred mote by a depu- tation of the reeve, or head man, and four best men of the township, had already been adopted so every man was a soldier. The assembly was, in truth, the tribe in arms, and the eorls and the ealdormen could but lead, they could not constrain, the will of their fellow-tribesmen. THE ENGLISH CONQUEST AND SETTLEMENT. 33 Left in the positions they had originally occupied, the tribes might have retained these institutions unaltered for centuries. The progress of the war necessitated expansion and amalgamation in order that greater force might be brought to bear on the enemy. As it had been with Rome so it was now with the English tribe. The system of popu- lar assemblies had reached its limit. The men of Dorset or the men of Norfolk could come up without difficulty to the place of meeting. The men of a State reaching from the Severn to the borders of Sussex could not come up. The idea of delegation, if it had as yet existed at all, had not acquired sufficient strength to suggest the idea of a general collective council. Recourse was had to a different factor in the commonwealth. Of all human occupations war re- quires the most complete discipline and the most prompt obedience to a single chief. Naturally, therefore, it was the chief, the ealdorman, who gained most by the changes wrought by war. Every-where he took the higher title of king, and in taking its title he gained a higher standing-point. He was the bond of union between many tribes. The ealdorman who now presided in the tribal .assembly derived his authority from him, even if he owed his position to an older tribal au- thority. At the end of the sixth century some ten or twelve kingdoms existed, and the authority of the kings would, doubtless, tend to increase in civil matters as they grew more successful as leaders in war. Yet, growing as it was, the king's authority was by no means absolute. The power which the king wielded could only be exercised in accordance with the wishes of the armed force, and that armed force was still, in great measure, com- posed of the contingents of the freemen of the several tribes. It is true that it was not so altogether. By an old German custom a great man had been accustomed to entertain a body of followers gesiths, as they were called in England who attached themselves, not to the tribe, but to the person of o* 34 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. him whom they followed, and upon whose bounty they lived. For him they fought, and for him they were ready to die. They held it disgraceful to forsake him in battle, or even to leave the field alive if he were lying dead upon it. No doubt, if we possessed a history of those times, we should find that these two component parts of the king's army were also component parts of his council, and the witan, or wise men, without whose advice he did not venture to act in any important matter, were, some of them, the chief men of his personal following ; some of them leading eorls, or land-own- ers, from the various populations which were blended to- gether under his rule. But, however this council may have been formed, it had no immediate organic connection with the people. Its members were not elected from beneath. They became councilors either from their own position in life, or as selected by the king. As long as there was a pow- erful enemy in the field this breach in the continuity of the constitution might not be felt ; but it was, none the less, a source of danger. The judicial arrangements of our ancestors were those of a strong-handed but law-loving race, in which each man was ready to do himself right with his own hand, but in which there was a general understanding that feuds should not be perpetual. The notion that it was the duty of the State to punish crime, and the notion that the criminal himself was any the worse for the crime which he had committed, would have been alike unintelligible to them. All that they saw was that it was in their power to enforce upon the kindred of a murdered man, or upon him who had suffered a loss of property, the acceptance of a weregild, or money payment, in satisfaction of the injury done to them, which they might otherwise have avenged by the slaughter of the aggressor. As, again, the power of taking vengeance was different in different ranks as the relations of a murdered king were more likely to take effectual vengeance than the relations of THE ENGLISH CONQUEST AND SETTLEMENT. 35 an eorl or a simple ceorl, and as they, therefore, required more to induce them to draw back a larger money payment was enforced in proportion to the rank of the person injured. As, too, the State had no interest in the matter, excepting to prevent continual private warfare, it had no trained police to seize the criminal, and no trained advocates or judges to in- vestigate evidence. It looked to the kindred of the accused person to present him before the popular assembly at which he was to be tried, or to pay his weregild in his stead. If he denied his guilt he had to bring others to swear that he was innocent, and the declaration of the belief of these compurgators in his favor was accepted as satisfactory. If he failed to find compurgators he had still the resource of ap- pealing to the ordeal, doubtless performed, in heathen times, in some specially sacred spot. The assembled people, who acted as his judges, contented themselves with seeing that the provisions of ancient customs were duly carried out. III. CONVERSION OF THE ENGLISH. MILMAN. [The conquerors had scarcely established themselves in the land when a contest began between the different English kingdoms for supremacy. To the war between Britons and Englishmen was added a war between En- glishmen and Englishmen. The struggle went on for two hundred years, and culminated in the final supremacy of Wessex. Long before the end of this period, however, an event had occurred which contributed power- fully to the work of consolidation and unification. This was the conver- sion of the heathen English to Christianity. The work was accomplished in the south by Roman, in the north by Irish, missionaries. The two tides of Christian influence met in the center of England. After a brief struggle the Roman party triumphed, in 664, at the Synod of Whit by, and Archbishop Theodore organized the new Church on the Roman model.] NOTHING certain is known concerning the first promulga- tion of the Gospel in Roman Britain. There can be no doubt, 36 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. however, that conquered and half-civilized Britain, like the rest of the Roman Empire, gradually received, during the second and third centuries, the faith of Christ. The depth of her Christian cultivation appears from her fertility in saints, and in heretics. But all were swept away, the worshipers of the saints and the followers of the heretics, by the Teutonic conquest. The German races which overran the island came from a remote quarter yet impenetrated by the missionaries of the Gospel. They knew nothing of Christianity but as the religion of that abject people whom they were driving before them into their mountains and fortresses. Christianity re- ceded, with the conquered Britons, into the mountains of Wales, or toward the borders of Scotland, or took refuge among the peaceful and flourishing monasteries of Ireland. The clergy fled, perhaps fought, with their flocks, and neither sought nor found opportunities of amicable intercourse, which might have led to the propagation of their faith ; while the savage pagans demolished the churches and monasteries, with the other vestiges of Roman civilization. They were little disposed to worship the God of a conquered people or to adopt the religion of a race whom they either despised as weak and unwarlike, or held as stubborn and implacable ene- mies. Nor was there sufficient charity in the British Chris- tians to enlighten the paganism of their conquerors. Happily Christianity appeared in an opposite quarter. Its missionaries from Rome were unaccompanied by any of these causes of mistrust and dislike. It came into that part of the kingdom the farthest removed from the hostile Britons. It was the religion of the powerful kingdom of the Franks; the influence of Bertha, the Frankish princess, the wife of King Ethelbert, wrought, no doubt, more powerfully for the recep- tion of the faith than the zeal and eloquence of Augustine. Gregory the Great, it has been said, before his accession to the papacy, had set out on the sublime though desperate mis- sion of the reconquest of Britain from idolatry. It was Greg- CONVERSION OF THE ENGLISH. 37 ory who commissioned the monk Augustine to venture on this glorious service. Yet so fierce and savage, according to the common rumor, were the Anglo-Saxon inhabitants of Britain, that Augustine shrank from the wild and desperate enter- prise; he hesitated before he would throw himself into the midst of a race of barbarous unbelievers, of whose language he was ignorant. Gregory would allow no retreat from a mission which he had himself been prepared to undertake, and which would not have appalled, even under less favor- able circumstances, his firmer courage. The fears of Augustine as to this wild and unknown land proved exaggerated. The monk and his forty followers landed without opposition on the shores of Britain. They sent to announce themselves as a solemn embassage from Rome, to offer to the King of Kent the everlasting bliss of heaven, an eternal kingdom in the presence of the true and living God. To Ethelbert, though not unacquainted with Chris- tianity, for, by the terms of his marriage, Bertha, the Prankish princess, had stipulated for the free exercise of her religion, there must have been something strange and imposing in the landing of these peaceful missionaries on a shore still con- stantly swarming with fierce pirates, who came to plunder or to settle among their German kindred. The name of Rome must have sounded, though vague, yet awful, to the ear of the barbarian. Any dim knowledge of Christianity which he had acquired from his Prankish wife would be blended with mysterious veneration for the pope, the great high-priest, the vicar of Christ and of God upon earth. With the cunning suspicion which mingles with the dread of the barbarian, the king insisted that the first meeting should be in the open air, as giving less scope for magic arts, and not under the roof of a house. Augustine and his followers met the king with all the pomp which they could command, with a crucifix of silver in the van of their procession, a picture of the Redeemer borne aloft, and chanting their litanies for the salvation of the king 38 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. and his people. "Your words and offers," replied the king, "are fair; but they are new to me, and, as yet, unproved; I cannot abandon at once the faith of my Anglian ancestors." But the missionaries were entertained with courteous hospi- tality. Their severely monastic lives, their constant prayers, fastings, and vigils, with their confident demeanor, impressed more and more favorably the barbaric mind. Rumor at- tributed to them many miracles. Before long the king of Kent was an avowed convert; his example was followed by many of his noblest subjects. No compulsion was used, but it was manifest that the royal favor inclined to those who received the royal faith. The British Church, secluded in the fastnesses of Wales, could not but hear of the arrival of the Roman missionaries, and of their success in the conversion of the Saxons. Au- gustine and his followers could not but inquire with deep interest concerning their Christian brethren in the remote parts of the island. It was natural that they should enter into communication ; unhappily they met to dispute on points of difference, not to join in harmonious fellowship on the broad grounds of their common Christianity. The British Church followed the Greek usage in the celebration of Easter ; they had some other points of ceremonial, which, with their descent, they traced to the East; and the zealous missiona- ries of Gregory could not comprehend the uncharitable inac- tivity of the British Christians, which had withheld the bless- ings of the Gospel from their pagan conquerors. The Roman and the British clergy met, it is said, in solemn synod. The Romans demanded submission to their discipline, and the implicit adoption of the western ceremonial on the contested points. The British bishops demurred ; Augustine proposed to place the issue of the dispute on the decision of a miracle. The miracle was duly performed a blind man brought for- ward and restored to sight. But the miracle made not the slightest impression on the obdurate Britons. They demanded CONVERSION OF THE ENGLISH. 39 a second meeting and resolved to put the Christianity of the strangers to a singular test, a moral proof with them more convincing than an apparent miracle. True Christianity, they said, " is meek and lowly of heart. Such will he this man (Augustine), if he be a man of God. If he be haughty and ungentle he is not of God, and we may disregard his words. Let the Romans arrive first at the synod. If on our approach he rises from his seat to receive us with meekness and humility, he is the servant of Christ, and we will obey him. If he despises us and remains seated, let us despise him." Augustine sat, as they drew near, in unbending dig- nity. The Britons at once refused obedience to his com- mands, and disclaimed him as their metropolitan. The indig- nant Augustine (to prove his more genuine Christianity) burst out into stern denunciations of their guilt in not having preached the Gospel to their enemies. He prophesied a prophecy which could hardly fail to hasten its own fulfillment the divine vengeance by the arms of the Saxons. So com- plete was the alienation, so entirely did the Anglo-Saxon clergy espouse the fierce animosities of the Anglo-Saxons, and even imbitter them by their theologic hatred, that the gentle Beda relates with triumph, as a manifest proof of 'the divine wrath against the refractory Britons, a great victory over that wicked race, preceded by a massacre of twelve hundred British clergy, chiefly monks of Bangor, who stood aloof on an eminence praying for the success of their coun- trymen. 40 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. IV. THE EARLY MONASTERIES. ALLEN. [The religious activity of the time showed itself mainly in the planting and endowment of monastic colonies, which gradually transformed the face of the country. " In this monastic movement two strangely contrasted impulses worked together to change the very aspect of the new England and the new English society. The one was the passion for solitude, the first outcome of the religious impulse given by the conversion ; a passion for communing apart with themselves and with God, which drove men into waste and woodland and desolate fen. The other was the equally new passion for social life on the part of the nation at large; the outcome of its settlement and well-doing on the conquered soil, and yet more of the influ- ence of the new religion, coming as it did from the social civilization of the older world, and invariably drawing men together by the very form of its worship and its belief."] IT was mainly by means of the monasteries that Christianity became a great civilizing and teaching agency in England. Those who judge monastic institutions only by their later and worst days, when they had, perhaps, ceased to perform any useful function, are apt to forget the benefits which they con- ferred upon the people in the earlier stages of their exist- ence. The state of England during this first Christian period was one of chronic and bloody warfare. There was no regular army, but every freeman was a soldier, and raids of one English tribe upon another were every-day occur- rences ; while pillaging frays on the part of the Welsh, fol- lowed by savage reprisals on the part of the English, were still more frequent. We catch glimpses, from time to time, of the unceasing strife between each folk and its neighbors, besides many hints of intestine struggles between prince and prince, or of rivalries between one petty shire and oth- ers of the same kingdom. With such a state of affairs as this it became a matter of deep importance that there should be some one institution THE EARLY MONASTERIES. 41 where the arts of peace might be carried on in safety, where agriculture might be sure of its reward, where literature and science might be studied, and where civilizing influences might be safe from interruption or rapine. The monasteries gave an opportunity for such an ameliorating influence to spring up. They were spared, even in war, by the reverence of the people for the Church ; and they became places where peaceful minds might retire for honest work and learning and thinking, away from the fierce turmoil of a still essentially barbaric and predatory community. At the same time they encouraged the development of this very type of mind by turning the reproach of cowardice, which it would have car- ried with it in heathen times, into an honor and a mark of holiness. Every monastery became a center of light and of struggling culture for the surrounding district. They were at once, to the early English recluse, universities and refuges, places of education, of retirement, and of peace in the midst of a jarring and discordant world. In the Roman south many, if not all, of the monasteries seem to have been planned on the regular models; but in the north, where the Irish missionaries had borne the largest share in the work of conversion, the monasteries were irregu- lar bodies on the Irish plan, where an abbot or abbess ruled over a mixed community of monks and nuns. Hild, a mem- ber of the Northumbrian princely family, founded such an abbey at Streoneshalch (Whitby), made memorable by num- bering among its members the first known English poet, Caedmon. St. John of Beverley, Bishop of Hexham, set up a similar monastery at the place with which his name is so closely associated. The Irish monks themselves founded others at Lindisfarne and elsewhere. Even in the south some Irish abbeys existed. In process of time, however, as the union with Rome grew stronger, all these houses con- formed to the more regular usage, and became monasteries of the ordinary Benedictine type. 42 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. The civilizing value of the monasteries can hardly be over- rated. Secure in the peace conferred upon them by a religious sanction, the monks became the builders of schools, the drain- ers of marsh-land, the clearers of forest, the tillers of heath. Many of the earliest religious houses rose in the midst of what had been trackless wilds. Peterborough and Ely grew up on islands of the fen county. Crowland gathered round the cell of Guthlac in the midst of a desolate mere. Evesham occupied a glade in the wild forests of the western march. Glastonbury, an old Welsh foundation, stood on a solitary islet where the abrupt knoll of the Tor looks down upon the broad waste of the Somersetshire marshes. Beverley, as its name imports, had been a haunt of beavers before the monks began to till its fruitful dingles. In every case agriculture soon turned the wild lands into orchards and corn-fields, or drove drains through the fens which converted their marshes into meadows and pastures for the long-horned English cat- tle. Roman architecture, too, came with the Roman Church. We hear nothing before of stone buildings ; but Eadvvine erected a church of stone at York, under the direction of Paulinus ; and Bishop Wilfrith, a generation later, restored and decorated it, covering the roof with lead and filling the windows with panes of glass. Masons had already been set- tled in Kent, though Benedict, the founder of Wearmouth and Jarrow, found it desirable to bring over others from the Franks. Metal-working had always been a special gift of the English, and their gold jewelry was well made even be- fore the conversion, but it became still more noticeable after the monks took the craft into their own hands. Beda men- tions mines of copper, iron, lead, silver, and jet. Abbot Benedict not only brought manuscripts from Rome, which were copied and imitated in his monasteries at Wearmouth and Jarrow, but he also brought over glass-blowers, who in- troduced the art of glass-making into England. Cuthbreht, Beda's scholar, writes to Lull, asking for workmen who THE EARLY MONASTERIES. 43 can make glass vessels. Bells appear to have been equally early introductions. Roman music, of course, accompanied the Roman liturgy. The connection established with the clergy of the continent favored the dispersion of European goods throughout England. We constantly hear of presents, con- sisting of skilled handicraft, passing from the civilized south to the rude and barbaric north. Wilfrith and Benedict jour- neyed several times to and from Rome, enlarging their own minds by intercourse with Roman society, and returning laden with works of art or manuscripts of value. Beda was acquainted with the writings of all the chief classical poets and philosophers, whom he often quotes. We can only liken the results of such intercourse to those which, in our own time, have proceeded from the opening of Japan to western ideas, or of the Hawaiian Islands to European civilization and European missionaries. The English school, which soon sprang up at Rome, and the Latin schools, which soon sprang up at York and Canterbury, are precise equivalents of the educational movements in both those countries which we see in our own day. The monks were to learn Latin and Greek " as well as they learned their own tongue," and were so to be given the key of all the literature and all the science that the world then possessed. The monasteries thus became real manufacturing, agri- cultural, and literary centers on a small scale. The monks boiled down the salt of the brine-pits ; they copied and illu- minated manuscripts in the library ; they painted pictures not without rude merit of their own ; they ran rhines through the marshy moorlands ; they tilled the soil with vigor and success. A new culture began to occupy the land the culture whose fully-developed form we now see around us. But it must never be forgotten that in its origin it is wholly Roman and not at all Anglo-Saxon. Our people showed themselves singularly apt at embracing it, like the modern Polynesians, and unlike the American Indians; but 44 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. they did not invent it for themselves. Our existing culture is not home-bred at all ; it is simply the inherited and widened culture of Greece and Italy. V. ALFRED'S EARLY YEARS.- FREEMAN. [It was in the reign of Ecgberht, king of Wessex, that all the English kingdoms were united for the first time under one ruler. But the young State was no sooner formed than it was forced to face a new danger in the invasion of the Northmen or Danes. These people came from the Scan- dinavian kingdoms of the north of Europe, were of the same blood as the English, but were far behind them in civilization, and were still heathen- They began to land in England, to harry the country, and to carry off their spoil. At first as robbers, then as settleis, and finally as conquerors, for two centuries they occupy a large space in English history. In the midst of their invasions Alfred ascended the West-Saxon throne, and a large portion of his life was devoted to beating off their attacks.] WE now come to our great King Alfred, the best and greatest of all our kings. We know quite enough of his his- tory to be able to say that he really deserves to be so called, though I must warn you that, just because he left so great a name behind him, people have been fond of attributing to him things which really belonged to others. Thus you may sometimes see nearly all our laws and customs attributed to Alfred, as if he had invented them all for himself. You will sometimes hear that Alfred founded trial by jury, divided England into counties, and did all kinds of other things. Now the real truth is that the roots and beginnings of most of these things are very much older than the time of Alfred, while the particular forms in which we have them now are very much later. But people have a way of fancying that every thing must have been invented by some particular man, and, as Alfred was more famous than any body else, they hit upon ALFRED'S EARLY YEARS. 45 Alfred as the most likely person to have invented them. But, putting aside fables, there is quite enough to show that there have been very few kings, and very few men of any sort, so great and good as King Alfred. Perhaps the only equally good king we read of is Saint Lewis of France ; and, though he was quite as good, we cannot set him down as being so great and wise as Alfred. Certainly no king ever gave himself up more thoroughly than Alfred did fully to do the duties of his office. His whole life seems to have been spent in doing all he could for the good of his people in every way. And it is wonderful in how many ways his pow- ers showed themselves. That he was a brave warrior is in itself no particular praise in an age when almost every man was the same. But it is a great thing for a prince, so large a part of whose time was spent in fighting, to be able to say that all his wars were waged to set free his country from the most cruel enemies. And we may admire, too, the wonder- ful way in which he kept his mind always straight and firm, never either giving way to bad luck or being puffed up by good luck. We read of nothing like pride or cruelty or in- justice of any kind either toward his own people or toward his enemies. And if he was a brave warrior, he was many other things besides. He was a lawgiver ; at least he col- lected and arranged the laws, and caused them to be most carefully administered. He was a scholar, and wrote and translated many books for the good of his people. He en- couraged trade and enterprise of all kinds, and sent men to visit distant parts of the world and bring home accounts of what they saw. And he was a thoroughly good man and a devout Christian in all relations of life. In short, one hardly knows any other character in all history so perfect, there is so much that is good in so many different ways ; and, though no doubt Alfred had his faults, like other people, yet he clearly had none, at any rate in the greater part of his life, which took away at all seriously from his general goodness. 46 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. One wonders that such a man was never canonized as a saint ; most certaintly many people have received that name who did not deserve it nearly so well as he did. Alfred, or, as his name should really be spelled, Alfred, was the youngest son of King ^Ethelwulf, and was born at Wantage, in Berkshire, in 849. His mother was Osburh, the first, or perhaps the second, wife of ^Ethelwulf, She was the daughter of Oslac, the king's cup-bearer, who came of the royal house of the Jutes in Wight. Now a story is told of Alfred and his mother, which you may, perhaps, have heard already, and which is such a beautiful tale that I am really sorry to have to say that it cannot possibly be true. We are told that up to the age of twelve years Alfred was fond of hunting and other sports, but that he had not been taught any sort of learning, not so much as to read his own tongue. But he loved the old English songs; and one day his mother had a beautiful book of songs, with rich pictures and fine painted initial letters, such as you may often see in ancient books. And she said to her children, " I will give this beautiful book to the one of you who shall first be able to read it." And Alfred said, " Mother, will you really give me the book when I have learned to read it ? " And Osburh said, " Yes, my son." So Alfred went and found a master, and soon learned to read. Then he came to his mother and read the songs in the beautiful book, and took the book for his own. Now it is a great pity that so pretty a story cannot be true, and I must tell you why it cannot. Alfred was sent to Rome to the pope when he was four years old; and if the pope took him as his "bishop-son," and anointed him to be king, one cannot help thinking that he would have taught him to read, and to learn Latin. And it is quite certain that he could do both very well in after life. Still this is not quite certain proof, as he might have learned afterward. But one thing is quite certain. Alfred was not twelve years old till 86 1. By ALFRED'S EARLY YEARS. 47 that time his brothers were not children playing round their mother, but grown men and kings, and two of them, ^Ethel- Stan and ^thelbald, were dead. Moreover, in 861 Alfred's father, vEthelwulf, was dead, and his mother must have been dead also, as ^Ethelwulf married Judith in 856, when Alfred was only seven years old. If, then, any thing of the kind happened, it could not have been when Alfred was twelve years old, but before he was four. For in that year he went to Rome, and could never have seen his mother again, even if she were alive when he went. And for a child of four years old not to be able to read, is not so very wonderful a thing, even in our own time.* In 871, on ./Ethelred's death, Alfred came to the crown, and he had at once to fight for his kingdom. The battle was at Wilton, near Salisbury, and does not seem to have been a very decisive one, as we read that the Danes were put to flight, and yet that they kept possession of the place of battle. And after the battle the Danes seem to have been tired : we read that they made peace with the West-Saxons, and there was peace, as far as Wessex was concerned, for a few years. * I have seen in different books two attempts to get out of this difficulty, but I do not think either of them will do. First, some suggest that Osburh was not dead when yEthelwulf married Judith, but that he had put her away, and that she might still have had her children about her. But of this there is no sort of proof, and when we read that a man, and especially a good man like ^Ethelwulf, married a sec- ond wife, we are bound to suppose that his first wife was dead, unless we have some clear proof that she was alive. And granting this, we still have the difficulty that, when Alfred was twelve years old, his brothers were not, as ihe story clearly implies, boys, but grown men and kings, and that some of them were dead. Secondly, some suggest that the story really belongs, not to Alfred's mother, Osburh, but to his step-mother, Judith. Now it is really ridiculous to fancy that this young foreign girl would act as a careful mother to yEthel- wulf 's sons, some of whom must have been older than herself, and one of whom (./Ethelbald) she was unprincipled enough to marry. Moreover, in 861 yEthelbald was already dead, and Judith had gone back into Gaul. 48 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. But they were all the while fighting and plundering and set- tling in other parts of Britain, and in 876 they came again into Wessex. We thus come to that part of Alfred's life which is at once the saddest and the brightest. It was the time when his luck was lowest and his spirit was highest. The army under Guthrum, the Danish king of East-Anglia, came sud- denly to Wareham, in Dorsetshire. The "Chronicle" says that they " bestole " that is, came secretly, or escaped from the West- Saxon army, which seems to have been waiting for them. This time Alfred made peace with the Danes, and they gave him some of their chief men for hos- tages, and they swore to go out of the land, but they did not keep their oath. . . . And now we come to the terrible year 878, the greatest and saddest and most glorious in all Alfred's life. In the very beginning of the year, just after Twelfth-night, the Dan- ish host again came suddenly "bestole," as the Chronicle says to Chippenham. Then " they rode through the West- Saxon's land, and there sat down, and mickle of the folk over sea they drove, and of the others the most deal they rode over, all but the King Alfred ; he with a little band hardly fared (went) after the woods and on the moor-fastnesses." How can I tell you this better than in the words of the Chronicle itself, only altering some words into their modern shape, that you may the better understand them ? But it is quite certain that this time of utter distress lasted only a very little while, for in a few months Alfred was again at the head of an army and able to fight against the Danes. It must have been at this time that the story of the cakes happened, if it ever happened at all. The tale is quite possible, but there is no proof of it being true. It is said that Alfred went and stayed in the hut of a neatherd or swineherd of his, who knew who he was, though his wife did not know him. One day the woman set some cakes to bake, and bade the king, who was sitting by the fire mending his bow and arrows, to ALFRED'S EARLY YEARS. 51 tend them. Alfred thought more of his bow and arrows than he did of the cakes, and let them burn. Then the woman ran in, and cried out : '' There, don't you see the cakes on fire? Then wherefore turn them not? You're glad enough to eat them when they're piping hot ! "* It is almost more strange when we are told by some that this swineherd or neatherd afterward became Bishop of Win- chester. They say that his name was Denewulf, and that the king said that, though he was in so lowly a rank, he was nat- urally a very wise man. So he had him taught, and at last gave him the bishopric. But it is hard to believe this, espe- cially as Denewulf, Bishop of Winchester, became bishop the very next year. VI. DUNSTAN, THE ECCLESIASTICAL STATESMAN. GREEN. [The struggle with the Danes gave a new direction to the growth of Wessex. By the Treaty of Wedmore (878) England was divided between Alfred and the Danish leader. Wessex lost her external supremacy, but her immediate territory was largely increased. The impulse, thus given, continued under Alfred's son and grandsons, until, in the reign of Eadgar, the boundaries of Wessex became co-extensive with those of the kingdom of England. This result seems to have been largely due lo the able admin- istration of Archbishop Dunstan.] THE completion of the West-Saxon realm was, in fact, reserved for the hands, not of a king or warrior, but of a priest. Dunstan stands first in the line of ecclesiastical states- men, who counted among them Lanfranc and Wolsey, and ended in Laud. He is still more remarkable in himself, in his own vivid personality, after eight centuries of revolution and change. He was born in the little hamlet of Glaston- bury, the home of his father, Heorstan, a man of wealth and * The woman's speech is put into two Latin verses. Most likely the whole- story comes from a ballad. 3 52 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. brother of the Bishop of Wells and of Winchester. It must have been in his father's hall that the fair, diminutive boy, with his scant but beautiful hair, caught his love for "the vain songs of heathendom, the trifling legends, the funeral chaunts," which afterward roused against him the charge of sorcery. Thence, too, he might have derived his passionate love of music, and his custom of carrying his harp in hand on journey or visit. Wandering scholars of Ireland had left their books in the monastery of Glastonbury, as they left them along the Rhine and the Danube; and Dunstan plunged into the study of sacred and profane letters till his brain broke down in delirium. So famous became his knowledge in the neighbor- hood that news of it reached the Court of ^Ethelstan; but his appearance there was the signal for a burst of ill-will among the courtiers. They drove him from the king's train, threw him from his horse as he passed through the marshes, and, with the wild passion of their age, trampled him under foot in the mire. The outrage ended in fever, and Dunstan rose from his sick-bed a monk. But the monastic profession was then little more than a vow of celibacy, and his devotion took no ascetic turn. His nature, in fact, was sunny, versatile, artistic, full of strong affections, and capable of inspiring others with affections as strong. Quick-witted, of tenacious memory, a ready and fluent speaker, gay and genial in ad- dress, an artist, a musician, he was at the same time an inde- fatigable worker at books, at building, at handicraft. As his sphere began to widen we see him followed by a train of pupils, busy with literature, writing, harping, painting, design- ing. One morning a lady summons him to her house to design a robe which she is embroidering, and as he bends with her maidens over their toil, his harp, hung upon the wall, sounds, without mortal touch, tones which the excited cars around frame into a joyous antiphon. From this scholar-life Dunstan was called to a wider sphere of activity by the accession of Eadmund. But the oldjeal- St. Dunstan DUNSTAN, THE ECCLESIASTICAL STATESMAN. 55 ousies revived at his re-appearance at court, and, counting the game lost, Dunstan preferred again to withdraw. The king had spent the day in the chase ; the red deer which he was pursuing dashed over Cheddar cliffs, and his horse only checked itself on the brink of the ravine at the moment when Eadmund, in the bitterness of death, was repenting of his injustice to Dunstan. He was at once summoned on the king's return. "Saddle your horse," said Eadmund, ''and ride with me." The royal train swept over the marshes to his home ; and the king, bestowing on him the kiss of peace, seated him in the abbot's chair as Abbot of Glastonbury. Dunstan became one of Eadmund's councilors, and his hand was seen in the settlement of the North. The league be- tween Scot and Briton was finally broken up, and the fidelity of the Scots secured by their need of help in holding down their former ally. The settlement was soon troubled by the young king's death. As he feasted at Pucklechurch, in the May of 946, Leofa, a robber whom Eadmund had banished from the land, entered the hall, seated himself at the royal board, and drew sword on the cup-bearer when he bade him retire. The king sprang in wrath to his thane's aid, and seizing Leofa by the hair, flung him to the ground ; but in the struggle the robber drove his dagger to Eadmund's heart. His death at once stirred fresh troubles in the North ; the Danelagh rose against his brother and successor, Eadred, and some years of hard fighting were needed before it was again driven to own the English supremacy. But with its submis- sion, in 954, the work of conquest was done. Dogged as his fight had been, the Northman at last owned himself beaten. From the moment of Eadred's final triumph all resistance came to an end. The Danelagh ceased to be a force in English politics. North might part anew from South; men of Yorkshire might again cross swords with men of Hampshire, but their strife was henceforth a local strife between men of the same people ; it was a strife of 56 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. Englishmen with Englishmen, and not of Englishmen with Northmen. The death of Eadred, in 955, handed over the realm to a child-king, his nephew, Eadwig. Eadwig was swayed by a woman of high lineage, ^Ethelgifu ; and the quarrel between her and the older councilors of Eadred broke into open strife at the coronation feast. On the young king's insolent withdrawal to her chamber, Dunstan, at the bidding of the Witan, drew him roughly back to his seat. But the feast was no sooner ended than a sentence of outlawry drove the abbot over sea, while the triumph of ^Ethelgifu was crowned, in 957, by the marriage of her daughter to the king, and the spoliation of the monasteries which Dunstan had befriended. As the new queen was Eadwig's kinswoman, the religious opinion of the day regarded his marriage as incestuous, and it was followed by a revolution. At the opening of 958 Arch- bishop Odo parted the king from his wife by solemn sentence; while the Mercians and Northumbrians rose in revolt, pro- claimed Eadwig's brother Eadgar their king, and recalled Dunstan. The death of Eadwig, a few months later, restored the unity of the realm; but his successor, Eadgar, was only a boy of fourteen, and throughout his reign the actual direc- tion of affairs lay in the hands of Dunstan, whose elevation to the see of Canterbury set him at the head of the Church as of the State. The noblest tribute to his rule lies in the silence of our chroniclers. His work, indeed, was a work of settlement, and such a work was best done by the simple en- forcement of peace. During the years of rest in which the stern hand of the Primate enforced justice and order, Northmen and Englishmen drew together into a single people. Their union was the result of no direct policy of fusion; on the con- trary, Dunstan's policy preserved to the conquered Danelagh its local rights and local usages. But he recognized the men of the Danelagh as Englishmen: he 'employed Northmen in the royal service, and promoted them to high posts in Church DUNSTAN, THE ECCLESIASTICAL STATESMAN. 57 and State. For the rest he trusted to time, and time justified his trust. The fusion was marked by a memorable change in the name of the land. Slowly as the conquering tribes had learned to know themselves by the one national name of Englishmen, they learned yet more slowly to stamp their name on the land they had won. It was not till Eadgar's day that the name of Britain passed into the name of Engla- land, the land of Englishmen, England. The same vigorous rule which secured rest for the country during these years of national union, told on the growth of material prosperity. Commerce sprang into a wider life. The laws of yEthelred, which provide for the protection and regulation of foreign trade, only recognize a state of things which grew up under Eadgar. It was in Eadgar's day that London rose to com- mercial greatness. VII. CNUT, THE GREAT DANISH KING. FREEMAN. [On the accession of the second ^thelred, named the Unready, the Danish wars began again, and soon passed into their third phase an attempt on the part of the King of all Denmark to subjugate the kingdom of England. The fatal policy was adopted of buying off the invaders. This led to more frequent invasions, and to ever-increasing demands for money, until at length the country was exhausted and could pay no more ; while, under the enervating influences of the time, the English military system seems to have utterly broken down. The Conquest, nearly finished by Swegen, was com- pleted by his son Cnut, who thus became King of all England. He won his success by unscrupulous means, but a great change came over him as soon as his power was firmly established.] THIS gradual change in the disposition of Cnut makes him one of the most remarkable, and, to an Englishman, one of the most interesting, characters in history. There is no other instance unless Rolf, in Normandy, be admitted as a forerunner on a smaller scale of a barbarian conqueror, en- 58 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. tering a country simply as a ruthless pirate, plundering, burn- ing, mutilating, slaughtering, without remorse, and then, as soon as he is seated on the throne of the invaded land, changing into a beneficent ruler and lawgiver, and winning for himself a place side by side with the best and greatest of its native sovereigns. Cnut never became a perfect prince like ^Elfred. An insatiable ambition possessed him through- out life, and occasional acts of both craft and violence disfig- ure the whole of his career. He always found some means, by death, by banishment, by distant promotion, of getting rid of any one who had once awakened his suspicions. Reasons of State were as powerful with him, and led him into as many unscrupulous actions as any more civilized despot of later times. But Englishmen were not disposed to canvass the justice of wars in which they won fame and plunder, while no enemy ever set foot on their own shores. They were as little disposed to canvass the justice of banishments and executions when, for many years, it was invariably a Dane, never an Englishmen, who was the victim. The law by which the Dane settled in England presently became an Englishman, received its highest carrying out in the person of the illustri- ous Danish king. As far as England and Englishmen were concerned, Cnut might seem to have acted on the principle of the Greek poet, that unrighteousness might be fittingly practiced in order to obtain a crown, but that righteousness should be practiced in all other times and places. The throne of Cnut, established by devastating wars, by unrighteous exe- cutions, perhaps even by treacherous assassinations, was, when once established, emphatically the throne of righteousness and peace. As an English king, he fairly ranks among the noblest of his predecessors. His best epitaph is his famous letter to his people on his Roman pilgrimage. Such a pilgrimage was an ordinary de- votional observance, according to the creed of those times. But in the eyes of Cnut it was clearly much more than a mere CNUT, THE GREAT DANISH KING. 59 perfunctory ceremony. The sight of the holy places stirred him to good resolves in matters both public and private, and, as a patriotic king, he employed his meeting with the pope, the emperor, and the Burgundian king, to win from all of them concessions which were profitable to the people of his various realms. No man could have written in the style in which Cnut writes to all classes of his English subjects, unless he were fully convinced that he possessed and deserved the love of his people. The tone of the letter is that of an absent father writing to his children. In all simplicity and confidence, he tells them the events of his journey, with what honors he had been received, and with what presents he had been loaded by the two chiefs of Christendom, and what privileges for his subjects, both English and Danish, he had obtained at their hands. He confesses the errors of his youth, and promises reformation of any thing which may still be amiss. All grievances shall be redressed; no extortions shall be allowed ; King Cnut needs no money raised by injus- tice. These are surely no mere formal or hypocritical profes- sions; every word plainly comes from the heart. The same spirit reigns in the opening of his laws. The precept to fear God and honor the king here takes a more personal and affectionate form. First, above all things, are men one God ever to love and worship, and one Christendom with one consent to hold, and Cnut king to love with right truthfulness. The laws themselves embrace the usual sub- jects, the reformation of manners, the administration of justice, the strict discharge of all ecclesiastical duties, and the strict payment of all ecclesiastical dues. The feasts of the two new national saints, Eadward the King and Dunstan the Primate, are again ordered to be observed, and the observance of the former is again made to rest in a marked way on the author- ity of the Witan. The observance of the Lord's Day is also strongly insisted on ; on that day there is to be no market- ing, no hunting; even the holding of folkmotes is forbidden, 60 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. except in cases of absolute necessity. All heathen supersti- tion is to be forsaken, and the slave-trade is again denounced. The whole fabric of English society is strictly preserved. The king legislates only with the consent of his Witan. The old assemblies, the old tribunals, the old magistrates, retain their rights and powers. The king, as well as all inferior lords, is to enjoy all that is due to him ; the royal rights, dif' fering somewhat in the West-Saxon and the Danish portioni of the kingdom, are to be carefully preserved, and neither extended nor diminished in either country. No distinction, except the old local one, is made between Danes and En- glishmen, and no sort of preference is made in favor of Quit's own Danish followers. And as Cnut's theory was, so was his practice. No king was more active in what was then held to be the first duty of kingship, that of constantly going through every portion of his realm to see with his own eyes whether the laws \\hich he enacted were duly put in force. In short, after Cnut's power was once fully established, we hear no complaint against his gov- ernment from any trustworthy English source. His hold upon the popular affection is shown by the number of personal anecdotes of which he is the hero. The man who is said, in the traditions of other lands, to have ordered the cold-blooded murder of his brother-in-law, and that in a church at the holy season of Christmas, appears in English tradition as a prince whose main characteristic is devotion mingled with good- humor. In the best-known tale of all, he rebukes the impi- ous flattery of his courtiers, and hangs his crown on the image of the crucified Saviour. He bursts into song as he hears the chant of the monks of Ely, and rejoices to keep the festivals of the Church among them. He bountifully rewards the sturdy peasant who proves the thickness of the ice over which the royal sledge has to pass. In ecclesiastical matters Cnut mainly, though not exclu- sively, favored the monks. His ecclesiastical appointments, CNUT, THE GREAT DANISH KING. 61 especially that of the excellent Archbishop ^Ethelnoth, who had baptized or confirmed him, do him high honor. He was also, after the custom of the age, a liberal benefactor to vari- ous ecclesiastical foundations. He made provision for all the holy places which had in any way suffered during his own or his father's wars. Nor was his bounty confined to England, or even to his own dominions. On his Roman pilgrimage the poor and the churches of every land through which he passed shared his bountiful alms. Such, then, was Cnut's internal government of England. The conqueror had, indeed, changed into a home-born king. At no earlier time had the land ever enjoyed so long a term of such unmixed prosperity. VIII. THE CLERGY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES. STEVENSON. [It is almost impossible to estimate too highly the influence of the clergy during the five hundred years that followed the conversion of the English to Christianity. Foremost in Church and State, they were the civilizers and educators of the English people. They fostered agriculture and the arts ; they protected the poor and weak against the rich and powerful ; they were the only barrier against the brute force of the times, and in a thousand chan- nels they made their influence fell for good. Their very success, however, demoralized them, and we shall find them, in the later ages, working rather for the interests of their own order t!:an for the good of the nation.] THROUGHOUT the earlier ages the clergy represented the true principles of democracy. In the best sense of the woid they were popular. They were of the people and for the people. They mediated between the commonalty and th'e nobles ; they were a barrier and a protection of the weak against the strong at a time when the throne was none. But for that interposition there would have been more grinding oppression, a-nd more revolting cruelty. Men who laughed 3* 62 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. at the laws enacted by the State, trembled at the censure of an ecclesiastical judge. That an independent power should be recognized as existing somewhere in the midst of the gen- eral anarchy, was an advantage; that it should be in the hands of those whose position secured them from abusing it, as the nobles did, was a blessing. The Church did what the crown could not do; it enforced its own decisions. It established a system of legislation, and its sanctions reached the noble no less than the peasant. To give free scope to this system, it reconstructed society by introducing a new classification of ranks and dignities. The world and the Church had each their peculiar system ; the rank which a man occupied in the State was not necessarily that which he occupied in the Church. No sooner did he cross the threshold of the sacred building than he was measured by a standard different from that which prevailed outside the fabric. Here worldly rank and power and influ- ence went for nothing; he took his place, whoever he might be, according to his moral worth and his religious educa- tion. The Church exercised her authority over the serf and the sovereign equally, and this authority was not to be gainsaid. The system of public penance placed in the hands of the priesthood an authority from the operation of which no state, no condition of life, was exempted. It was for them to specify the nature of the temporal punishment due to the transgression of the law, to limit its application, and to fix its continuance. Except in a few extreme cases, its severity might be modified, or it might be withdrawn altogether, at the .discretion of the bishop. In cases of extraordinary guilt the penitent was forbidden to enter the church, a distinctive dress was assigned him; he walked barefoot, his food was bread, water, and herbs. Mere worldly rank could plead no exemption for the guilty. At a time when every man went armed, when human life was little valued, when it was considered meritorious to THE CLERGY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES. 63 avenge upon the spot every wrong, imaginary or real, when the opportunities of escape from the pursuit of justice were many, when the law was slow of foot and weak of hand, originated the privilege of sanctuary. It was a revival of that earlier law which had provided a place of refuge, " that the slayer might flee thither that should kill his neighbor unawares, and hated him not in times past, and that fleeing thither he might live." What the cities of refuge had been to the Jew, the Church was to the Christian. For centuries the clergy were the only representatives of the principle, now so generally acknowledged in all free states, that, until a man has been proved to be guilty, he shall be considered to be innocent. They went a step further, and declared that no man should be accuser, witness, advocate, judge, and exe- cutioner in his own cause. They preached and wrote, against the dangerous theory, always apt to become dominant in an imperfect degree of civilization, that the survivor must avenge the blood of the slain. They refused to join in the cry which deifies " the wild justice of revenge." By extend- ing its protection over those who fled to it for safety, the Church afforded time for the first burst of passion to subside, and the voice of reason to be heard, and all must have seen that, in mediating between the offender and the offended, it did so for the good of both. The middle classes, to which England is indebted fora very large share of the wealth, intelligence, and independence which have made her what she is, originated in that fusion of ranks which constituted the clergy. In the earlier ages of society the two great divisions of the people are the noble and the ignoble, and the Church afforded the only common ground of approximation. Here, and here only, their interests met, blended, and harmonized. Recognizing, as has already been stated, none of the distinctions which prevailed in the world, the Church welcomed the highest and the lowest. It offered the same advantages and the same rewards to both. If the 64 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. son of the poor man could rise above the condition of his father, and emerge from the degradation to which feudalism had consigned the class to which he belonged, it was through the agency of the Church. The history of the Middle Ages shows how frequently the highest dignities which the State had to offer have been attained by ecclesiastics of the humblest parentage. If we have examples of kings, like Offa and Ceadwalla, Ceolwulf and Ini, who became monks, we have instances of monks, like Dunstan and Anselm, who be- came archbishops, and as such governed kingdoms and kings. Nicholas Breakspear, from a poor serving-lad at St. Albans, became pope of Rome. If the Church of the poor man opened up to him and his the road to fame and honor, we cannot wonder that it had his respect and his affection in return, and, as a thank-offering, the best that he had to give. Again, the clergy of the Middle Ages secured no small ac- cession of strength in public estimation from the struggle which they carried on against slavery. Here they fought the battle of the weak against the powerful, and in the end they were victorious through the force of public opinion. The circumstances of the times afforded ample scope for the exercise of this active benevolence. According to the spirit in which war was then conducted, the goods, the person, and the life of the vanquished were at the disposal of the victor. If he sacrificed his defeated enemy to the war-god of his na- tion, it was justice; if he sold him into captivity, or made him labor in his own service, it was clemency. Further, men might become slaves as a punishment for certain crimes, or they might be born in a state of slavery. Against this system in all its forms the clergy protested upon principles of pure and genuine philanthropy. They opposed it because they regarded it, as all good men will ever regard it, as affecting the dignity, the happiness, and the welfare, temporal and spir- itual, of all who fall under its power ; and the Church, by its laws and its example, its wealth and its influence, succeeded THE CLERGY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES. 65 first in mitigating, and then in suppressing, the crime of slav- ery, which for centuries polluted every nation of Europe. Intimately connected with this subject, and with the whole condition of society in those early times, is the care with which the clergy watched over the poor, the widow, and the orphan. These they regarded as their especial inheritance, and upon them they spent willingly and liberally the funds which had been placed at their disposal. But, more lasting still, as outliving all change of society, was the care taken by the clergy for the education of the people. For a long time they were the only teachers of the entire population of England. Instruction was nowhere to be had but from them. They collected, preserved, and trans- mitted the scattered fragments of learning which had de- scended to their own time. The monastery was the only school, the monk or the cleric the only teacher. The edu- cation which they could give was no trifling boon ; and the laity could not fail to notice that it led to the substan- tial prizes of wealth, honor, and influence. With no better advantages than those which the school of the monastery at Wearmouth afforded, Beda achieved a reputation which car- ried his name over Europe. Alcuin, educated within the monastery of York, was competent to teach the teachers of Charlemagne, and he obtained from that monarch the proud title of the restorer of letters in France. The bishop in his palace, the monk in his monastery, and the parish priest in his parsonage, each contributed to the great work of educa- tion. Ecclesiastical laws were enacted to secure for the peo- ple the advantages which it was believed would result from a system so comprehensive. Nor were these schools instituted for professional purposes only. The benefits they conferred were not limited to those persons who were intended to re- cruit the ranks of the priesthood ; for, although these schools were founded by the clergy, supported by the clergy, and conducted by the clergy, yet free access was afforded to all 66 SKETCHES FR'OM ENGLISH HISTORY. who chose to profit by the advantages which they offered. Persons of different ranks of life were thus instructed in sec- ular and religious learning, who might afterward marry and enter the world as laymen. From these considerations it appears that during the early period there existed a remarkable unity of sentiment and in- terest between the clergy and the people. We have seen that the bishop and the parish priest cared as well for the temporal happiness as the spiritual progress of all sorts and conditions of men. They could help the Saxon serf and the Norman villein and his family in various ways, and they did not hesitate to lend a helping hand. By their influence the chain of the bondman's slavery was made less galling; his children were educated and advanced in life. They stood between him and the oppression of his feudal superior; and, if this were not enough, through them his wrongs found a way to the ear of the sovereign. They were his advocates in the courts of law, in prison they visited and comforted him. If he had been plundered, they (if any one could) obtained for him the restitution of his property. In sickness they were the physician of the body as well as of the soul, for the little skill in the art of healing which then existed was in the hands of the clergy. If the disease was of long continu- ance, the monastery was at once dispensary and hospital. The various offices of charity, kindness, usefulness, and broth- erly love which were discharged by Churchmen alone for cent- uries, are now parceled out among a variety of religious and benevolent societies, each of which stands high in public esti- mation. They did the work of Scripture readers at home and of missionaries abroad. Their system, so long as it existed, rendered it unnecessary to tax the country for the support of the poor. For a. long period, the monastery was the only inn; there the traveler was welcomed", housed, and fed; if overtaken by sickness he was tended there with unpaid skill and watchfulness until he could proceed upon his journey. THE CLERGY IN THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES. 67 Their ready benevolence and untiring zeal originated and carried on the machinery which in our day requires the sup- port of thousands of voluntary subscribers, and millions of involuntary taxpayers. IX. BATTLE OF SENLAC OR HASTINGS. FREEMAN. [The two sons of Cnut, Harold and Harthacnut, died childless, after brief and disgraceful reigns, and the nation restored the old line of kings in the person of Eadward, called the Confessor, son of yEthelred the Un- ready and a Norman princess. He had spent most of his youth at the Norman court. Weak, pious, well-intentioned, he was better fitted for a Norman monastery than for the English throne. His court became a gathering-place for Norman courtiers and ecclesiastics, whose influence, however, was largely counteracted by Earl Godwine.who had risen to power in the days of Cnut, and who had the chief management of affairs under Eadward, with one brief interval, until his death, in 1053. He was suc- ceeded by his son, Earl Harold, who had married the king's sister. On the death of Eadward, without issue, early in 1066, Harold was elected to the vacant throne. His right was at once disputed by William, Duke of the Normans, on the ground that Eadward had promised him the crown, and that Harold had sworn to maintain William's claim. Though Will- iam's title had no legal basis, he determined to enforce it with the sword, and the two rivals met on the field of Hastings.] MEANWHILE King Harold marshaled his army on the hill, to defend their strong post against the attack of the Nor- mans. All were on foot ; those who had horses made use of them only to carry them to the field, and got down when the time came for actual fighting. The army was made up of soldiers of two very different kinds. There was the king's personal following, his housecarls, his own thanes, and the picked troops generally, among them the men of London, who claimed to be the king's special guards, and the men of Kent, who claimed to strike the first blow in the battle. They 68 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. had armor much the same as that of the Normans, with jave- lins to hurl first of all, and for the close fight either the sword, the older English weapon, or more commonly the great Danish ax, which had been brought in by Cnut. This was wielded with both hands, and was the most fearful of all weapons if the blow reached its mark, but it left its bearer specially exposed while dealing the blow The men were ranged as closely together as the space needed for wielding their arms would let them ; and, besides the palisade, the front ranks made a kind of inner defense with their shields, called the shield-wall. The Norman writers were specially struck with the close array of the English, and they speak of them as standing like trees in a wood. Besides these choice troops there were also the general levies of the neighboring lands, who came armed anyhow, with such weapons as they could get, the bow being the rarest of all. These inferior troops were placed to the right, on the least exposed part of the hill, while the king, with his choice troops, stood ready to meet Duke William himself. The king stood between his two ensigns, the national badge, the dragon of Wessex, and his own standard, a great flag with the figure of a fighting man wrought on it in gold. Close by the king stood his brothers, Gyrth and Leofwine, and his other kinsfolk. By nine in the morning the Normans had reached the hill of Senlac, and the fight began. But before the real attack was made a juggler, or minstrel, in the Norman army, known as Taillefcr, that is, the Cleaver of Iron, asked the duke's leave to strike the first blow. So he rode out, singing songs of Charlemagne, as the French call the Emperor Charles the Great, and of Roland, his paladin. Then he threw his sword up in the air and caught it again ; he cut down two English- men, and then was cut down himself. After this mere bravado came the real work. First came a flight of arrows from each division of the Norman army. Then the heavy- armed foot pressed on, to make their way up the hill and to BATTLE OF SENLAC OR HASTINGS. 69 break down the palisade. But the English hurled their jave- lins at them as they came up, and cut them down with their axes when they came near enough for hand-strokes. The Normans shouted, " God help us ! " the English shouted, " God Almighty ! " and the king's own war-cry of " Holy Cross" the Holy Cross of Waltham. William's heavy- armed foot pressed on along the whole line, the native Nor- mans having to face King Harold's chosen troops in the center. The attack was vain ; they were beaten back, and they could not break down the palisade. Then the horsemen themselves, the duke at their head, pressed on up the hill- side. But all was in vain. ; the English kept their strong ground ; the Normans had to fall back ; the Bretons on the left actually turned and fled. Then the worse-armed and less-disciplined English troops could not withstand the temptation to come down from the hill and chase them. The whole line of the Norman army began to waver, and in many parts to give way. A tale spread that the duke was killed. William showed himself to his troops, and, with his words, looks, and blows, helped by his brother, the bishop, he brought them back to the fight. The flying Bretons now took heart ; they turned and cut in pieces the English who were chasing them. Thus far the resistance of the English had been thoroughly successful, wherever they had obeyed the king's orders, and kept within their defenses. But the fault of those who had gone down to follow the enemy had weakened the line of defense, and had shown the Normans the true way of winning the day. Now came the fiercest struggle of the whole day. The duke and his immediate following tried to break their way into the English inclosure at the very point where the king stood by his standard with his brothers. The two rivals were near coming face to face. At that moment Earl Gyrth hurled his spear, which missed the duke, but killed his horse and brought his rider to the ground. William then pressed 70 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. to the barricade on foot, and slew Gyrth in hand-to-hand fight. At the same time the king's other brother, Earl Leofwine, was killed. The duke mounted another horse, and again pressed on ; but the barricade and the shield-wall withstood all attempts. On the right the attack of the French division had been more lucky ; the palisade was partly broken down, But the English, with their axes and shields, still kept their ground, and the Normans were still unable to gain the top of the hill or to come near the standard. The battle had now gone on for several hours, and Duke William saw that, unless he quite changed his tactics, he had no hope of overcoming the resistance of the English. They had suffered a great loss in the death of the two earls, and their defenses were weakened at some points ; but the army, as a whole, held its ground as firmly as ever. William then tried a most dangerous stratagem, his taking to which shows how little hope he now had of gaining the day by any direct attack. He saw that his only way was to bring the English down from the hill, as part of them had already come down. He, therefore, bade his men feign flight. The Normans obeyed ; the whole host seemed to be flying. The irregular levies of the English on the right again broke their line; they ran down the hill, and left the part where its ascent was most easy open to the invaders. The Normans now turned on their pursuers, put most of them to flight, and were able to ride up the part of the hill which was left undefended, seemingly about three o'clock in the afternoon. The English had thus lost the advantage of the ground ; they had now, on foot, with only the bulwark of their shields, to withstand the horsemen. This, however, they still did for some hours longer. But the advantage was now on the Norman side, and the battle changed into a series of single combats. The great object of the Normans was to cut their way to the standard, where King Harold still fought. Many men were killed in the at- tempt ; the resistance of the English grew slacker, but yet, BATTLE OF SENLAC OR HASTINGS. 71 when evening was coming on, they still fought on with their king at their head, and a new device of the duke's was needed to bring the battle to an end. This new device was to bid his archers shoot in the air, that their arrows might fall, as he said, like bolts from heaven. They were, of course, bidden specially to aim at those who fought around the standard. Meanwhile twenty knights bound themselves to lower or bear off the standard itself. The archers shot ; the knights pressed on ; and one arrow had the deadliest effect of all ; it pierced the right eye of King Harold. He sank down by the standard ; most of the twenty knights were killed, but four reached the king while he still breathed, slew him with many wounds, and carried off the two ensigns. It was now evening ; but though the king was dead, the fight still went on. Of the king's own chosen troops it would seem that not a man either fled or was taken prisoner. All died at their posts, save a few wounded men who were cast aside as dead, but found strength to get away on the morrow. But the irregular levies fled, some of them on the horses of the slain men. Yet even in this last moment they knew how to revenge themselves on their conquerors. The Normans, ignorant of the country, pursued in the dark. The English were thus able to draw them to the dangerous place behind the hill, where not a few Normans were slain. But the duke himself came back to the hill, pitched his tent there, held his midnight feast, and watched there with his host all night. 72 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. X. THE CONQUEROR AND HIS POLICY. GREEN. [Although the great victory at Senlac did not put William in possession of the whole country, it, nevertheless, decided the fate of England. He advanced upon the capital and, two months after the battle, was elected and crowned as king. Even then he was in real possession of only a third of the kingdom. Hut he met, henceforth, with no general, organized resist- ance. Revolts here and there were easily crushed, and gradually his authority was extended over the whole land. In three years the Conquest was complete. It was not a conquest in the ordinary sense. It was not the complete "subjugation of one people by another people. The Norman duke had taken the place of the English king, and he had taken it by force ; but he presented himself to the conquered nation as its legitimate ruler. The ultimate results of the change were almost incalculable, but the. immediate results were few. The old laws and customs were preserved, and the continuity of English history remained unbroken.] IT is to the stern discipline of our foreign kings that we owe not merely English wealth and English freedom, but England herself. And of these foreign masters the greatest was William of Normandy. In William the wild impulses of the Northman's blood mingled strangely with the cool temper of the modern statesman. As he was the last, so he was the most terrible outcome of the northern race. The very spirit of the sea-robbers, from whom he sprang, seemed embodied in his gigantic form, his enormous strength, his savage countenance, his desperate bravery, the fury of his wrath, the ruthlessness of his revenge. " No knight under heaven," his enemies owned, "was William's peer." Boy as he was at Val-es-dunes, horse and man went down before his lance. All the fierce gayety of his nature broke out in the warfare of his youth. No man could bend William's bow. His mace crashed its way through a ring of English warriors to the foot of the standard. He rose to his greatest height at moments when other men despaired. His voice rang out as a trumpet when his soldiers fled before the English charge THE CONQUEROR AND His POLICY. 73 at Senlac, and his rally turned the flight into a means of vic- tory. In his winter march on Chester he strode at the head of his fainting troops, and helped with his own hand to clear a road through the snow-drifts. And with the Northman's daring broke out the Northman's pitilessness. When the townsmen of Alencon hung raw hides along their walls, in scorn of the " tanner's " grandson, William tore out his pris- oners' eyes, hewed off their hands and feet, and flung them into the town. Hundreds of Hampshire men were driven from their homes to make him a hunting-ground, and his harrying of Northumbria left Northern England a desolate waste. Of men's love or hate he recked little. His grim look, his pride, his silence, his wild outbursts of passion, left William lonely even in his court. His subjects trembled as he passed. " Stark man he was," writes the English chron- icler, " and great awe men had of him." His very wrath was solitary. " To no man spake he, and no man dared speak to him," when the news reached him of Harold's seizure of the throne. It was only when he passed from his palace to the loneliness of the woods that the king's temper unbent. "He loved the wild deer as though he had been their father." It was the genius of William which lifted him out of this mere Northman into a great general and a great statesman. The wary strategy of his French campaigns, the organization of his attack upon England, the victory of Senlac, the quick resource, the steady perseverance which achieved the Con- quest, showed the wide range of his generalship. His polit- ical ability had shown itself from the first moment of his acces- sion to the ducal throne. William had the instinct of govern- ment. He had hardly reached manhood when Normandy lay peaceful at his feet. Revolt was crushed; discord was tram- pled under foot. The Duke "could never love a robber," be he baron or knave. The sternness of his temper stamped it- self throughout upon his rule. " Stark he was to men that withstood him," says the chronicler of his English system 74 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. of government ; "so harsh and cruel was he that none dared withstand his will. Earls that did aught against his bidding he cast into bondage. If a man would live and hold his lands, need it were he followed the king's will." Stern as such a rule was, it gave rest to the land. Even amid the suf- ferings which necessarily sprang from the circumstances of the Conquest itself, from the erection of castles or the in- closure of forests or the exactions which built up William's hoard at Winchester, Englishmen were unable to forget "the good peace he made in the land, so that a man might fare over his realm with a bosom full of gold." Strange touches, too, of a humanity far in advance of his age contrasted with this general temper of the Conqueror's government. One of the strongest traits in his character was an aversion to shed blood by process of law ; he formally abolished the punishment of death, and only a single execution stains the annals of his reign. An edict yet more honorable to his humanity put an end to the slave-trade which had, till then, been carried on at the port of Bristol. The contrast between the ruthlessness and pitifulness of his public acts sprang, indeed, from a contrast within his temper itself. The pitiless warrior, the stern and awful king, was a tender and faithful husband, an affectionate father. The lonely silence of his bearing broke into gracious converse with pure and sacred souls like Anselm. If William was "stark "to rebel and baron, men noted that he was "mild to those that loved God." But the greatness of the Conqueror was seen in more than the order and peace which he imposed upon the land. Fort- une had given him one of the greatest opportunities ever offered to a king of stamping his own genius on the destinies of a people ; and it is the way in which he seized on this op- portunity which has set William among the foremost states- men of the world. The struggle which ended in the fens of Ely had wholly changed his position. He no longer held the land merely as its national and elected king. To his elective THE CONQUEROR AND His POLICY. 75 right he added the right of conquest. It is the way in which William grasped and employed this double power that marks the originality of his political genius, for the system of gov- ernment which he devised was, in fact, the result of this double origin of his rule. It represented neither the purely feudal system of the Continent nor the system of the older English royalty; more truly, perhaps, it may be said to have repre- sented both. As the conqueror of England, William devel- oped the military organization of feudalism so far as was necessary for the secure possession of his conquests. The ground was already prepared for such an organization. We have watched the beginnings of English feudalism in the warriors, the "companions" or "thegns" who were personally attached to the king's war-band and received estates from the folkland in reward for their personal services. In later times this feudal distribution of estates had greatly increased, as the bulk of the nobles followed the king's example, and bound their tenants to themselves by a similar process of sub- infeudation. The pure freeholders, on the other hand, the class which formed the basis of the original English society, had been gradually reduced in number, partly through imi- tation of the class above them, but more through the pressure of the Danish wars and the social disturbances consequent upon them which forced these freemen to seek protection among the thegns at the cost of their independence. Even before the reign of William, therefore, feudalism was super- seding the older freedom in England as it had already super- seded it in Germany and France. But the tendency was quickened and intensified by the Conquest. The desperate and universal resistance of the country forced William to hold by the sword what the sword had won ; and an army strong enough to crush at any moment a national revolt, was needful for the preservation of his throne. Such an army could only be maintained by a vast confiscation of the soil, ami the failure of the English risings cleared the ground for 76 SKETCHES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. its establishment. The greater part of the higher nobility fell in battle or fled into exile, while the lower thegnhood either forfeited the whole of their lands or redeemed a por- tion by the surrender of the rest. We see the completeness of the confiscation in the vast estates which William was en- abled to grant to his more powerful followers. Two hundred manors in Kent, with more than an equal number elsewhere, rewarded the services of his brother Odo, and grants almost as large fell to William's counselors, Fitz-Osborn and Mont- gomery, or to barons like the Mowbrays and the Clares. But the poorest soldier of fortune found his part in the spoil. The meanest Norman rose to wealth and power in this new dominion of his lord. Great or small, each manor thus granted was granted on condition of its holder's service at the king's call ; a whole army was by this means encamped upon the soil, and William's summons could at any hour gather an overwhelming force around his standard. Such a force, however, effective as it was against the con- quered English, was hardly less formidable to the crown itself. When once it was established, William found himself fronted in his new realm by a feudal baronage, by the men he had so hardly bent to his will in Normandy, and who were as impatient of law, as jealous of the royal power, as eager for an unbridled military and judicial independence within their own manors here as there. The political genius of the Conqueror was shown in his appreciation of this danger and in the skill with which he met it. Large as the estates he granted were, they were scattered over the country in such a way as to render union between the great landhold- ers, or the hereditary attachment of great areas of population to any one separate lord, equally impossible. A yet wiser measure struck at the very root of feudalism. When the larger holdings were divided by their owners into smaller sub-tenancies, the under-tenants were bound by the same conditions of service to their lord as he to the Crown. "Hear, THE CONQUEROR AND His POLICY. 77 my lord," swore the vassal, as kneeling bareheaded and with- out arms he placed his hands within those of his superior, " I become liege man of yours for life and lirnb and earthly regard ; and I will keep faith and loyalty to you for life and death, God help me ! " Then the kiss of his lord invested him with land as a "fief" to descend to him and his heirs forever. In other countries such a vassal owed fealty to his lord against all foes, be they king or no. B) the usage, how- ever, which William enacted in England each sub-tenant, in addition to his oath of fealty to his lord, swore fealty di- rectly to the Crown, an