un
 
 CHARLES JAMES FOX
 
 Snery Walker ffh<c 
 
 (~>/iar/e.) I a me*) /r 
 
 / r
 
 CHARLES JAMES FOX 
 
 A COMMENTARY 
 ON HIS LIFE AND CHARACTER 
 
 BY WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR 
 
 EDITED BY 
 
 STEPHEN WHEELER 
 
 EDITOR OF "LETTERS AND UNPUBLISHED WRITINGS 
 
 OF LANDOR," AND OF "LETTERS OF W. S. LANDOR, 
 
 PRIVATE AND PUBLIC " 
 
 WITH A PORTRAIT 
 
 NEW YORK: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS 
 LONDON : JOHN MURRAY 
 
 1907
 
 PRINTED BY 
 
 HAZKI.L, WATSON AND VINKY, I,D. 
 LONDON AND AYLESBOBY. 
 
 ENGLAND
 
 CONTENTS 
 
 FAGK 
 
 INTRODUCTION BY THE EDITOR . . . . vii 
 
 COMMENTARY ON MEMOIRS OF MR. FOX . . 1 
 
 DEDICATION TO PRESIDENT MADISON . . 5 
 
 ADVERTISEMENT 13 
 
 LANDOR'S PREFACE 16 
 
 1. A GEORGIAN STATESMAN .42 
 
 II. WAR AND POLICY 67 
 
 III. THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS .... 69 
 
 IV. IRELAND AND THE UNION 86 
 
 V. VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 94 
 
 VI. GHENT AND ANTWERP Ill 
 
 VII. DUTCH NETHERLANDS 116 
 
 VIII. COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 127 
 
 IX. MR. FOX IN PARIS 169 
 
 X. COURT OF BONAPARTE 176 
 
 XL MINISTRY OF ALL THE TALENTS . . . .198 
 
 XII. LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX . . . .210 
 
 XIII. SOME LETTERS FROM C. J. FOX . . . .226 
 
 XIV. POSTSCRIPT , 236 
 
 INDEX .247
 
 INTRODUCTION 
 
 ABOUT the middle of the last century Walter 
 Savage Landor, then living placidly for the most 
 part, but with intervals of indignation, at Bath, 
 was provoked by the remark of The Quarterly 
 Review that, among authors of any sort of note, 
 he alone clung with equal pertinacity to his ancient 
 abuse of Bonaparte as a blockhead and coward, 
 of Pitt as a villain, of Fox as a scoundrel, of 
 Canning as a scamp. 1 This drew from the un- 
 subduable old Roman, as Carlyle called him, a 
 letter addressed to The Examiner? in which he 
 
 1 Referring to the abuse of the Duke of Wellington, to which some 
 English writers had degraded themselves, the reviewer had said : "But 
 the truth is, and we are bound to tell it, it was the Liberal press 
 in France that in this matter gave law to our patriots. . . . When 
 French people could no longer resist the evidence of all great gifts 
 and noble qualities with which that record was filled, when they owned 
 that it would not do to persist in their old vein of disparagement . . . 
 when this was the result in France, the home faction saw it was time 
 to consider the matter, and they undoubtedly showed and continue to 
 show signs of repentance. The exceptions are few. . . . Among 
 authors of books of any note, verse or prose, we recollect of none 
 unless Mr. W. Savage Landor, who, however, clings with equal per- 
 tinacity to his ancient abuse of Bonaparte as a blockhead and a coward, 
 of Byron as a rhymer wholly devoid of genius or wit, of Pitt as a 
 villain, of Fox as a scoundrel, of Canning as a scamp, and so on." 
 Quarterly Review, vol. 86, p. 130 (Dec. 1849). 
 
 1 Examiner, January 15, 1850. The letter is reprinted in 
 Lander's Last Fruit off an Old Tree, p. 339. 
 
 vii
 
 viii INTRODUCTION 
 
 appealed to every one who had read his writings, 
 however negligently or malignantly, to avow the 
 injustice of the charge. That he had not always 
 been content to use the most deferential forms 
 when speaking of those eminent persons will be 
 seen from his Commentary on John Bernard 
 Trotter's Memoirs of the Latter Years of the Right 
 Honourable Charles James Fox. 
 
 Landor's Commentary, though written toward 
 the end of 1811 and printed early in 1812, is now 
 published for the first time. The manuscript must 
 have been destroyed ages ago. Of the printed 
 copies one only seems to have survived. This is 
 in the possession of the Earl of Crewe, who kindly 
 allowed me to transcribe it. On the fly-leaf is 
 the following manuscript note, written by his lord- 
 ship's father, Lord Houghton, then Mr. Monckton 
 Milnes : 
 
 " I believe this volume to be unique. Mr. Lan- 
 dor told me he was aware of the existence of 
 no other copy. The whole edition was wasted, 
 with the exception of this copy, which the author 
 gave to Mr. Southey. 
 
 " RICHD. M. MILNES." 
 
 Trotter's Memoirs of 'Charles James Fox appeared 
 in 1811, and quickly ran through three editions. 
 The book was dedicated to the Prince Regent 
 in recognition, amongst other things, "of that 
 interesting sensibility which endears you so much
 
 A LITERARY SENSATION ix 
 
 to those who are acquainted with you in their 
 private circle and of your public virtues, which 
 are drawing upon you the love, admiration and 
 blessings of this great empire." 
 
 Trotter's work made a considerable stir at the 
 time, and was reviewed by Canning and Ellis in 
 the twelfth number of The Quarterly Review. 
 Of the author one may read in The European 
 Magazine for 1806 that in the August of that 
 year Mr. Fox, Secretary of State, appointed 
 Mr. Trotter, nephew of his late friend, the Bishop 
 of Down, to be his private secretary ; and Trotter's 
 narrative shows that before then he had been 
 on intimate terms with his patron, whom he visited 
 at St. Anne's Hill and accompanied on a tour to 
 the Low Countries and France in 1802. 
 
 The earliest reference to Landor's Commentary 
 is in a letter Southey wrote to him on February 10, 
 1812. 1 In this Southey says that he had received 
 from Mr. John Murray a parcel containing, among 
 other things, an unfinished Commentary upon 
 Trotter's book. Southey proceeds : 
 
 " Aut Landor, aut diabolus. From the manner, 
 from the force, from the vehemence, I concluded 
 it must be yours, even before I fell upon the 
 passage respecting Spain 2 which proves it was 
 yours. I could not lie down this night with an 
 
 1 The correspondence between Southey and Landor is given in 
 Forster's Walter Savage Landor: a Biography, London, 1869. 
 7 See below, p. 182. 
 
 b
 
 x INTRODUCTION 
 
 easy conscience if I did not beseech you to sus- 
 pend the publication till you have cancelled some 
 passages : that attack upon Fellowes 1 might bring 
 you into a court of justice. ... It would equally 
 grieve me to have the book supprest, or to have 
 it appear as it is. It is yours all over the non 
 imitabile fnlmen." 
 
 It was at Southey's request that Mr. Murray, 
 in 1811, had agreed to bring out Lander's Count 
 Julian: a Tragedy. But Landor sent his Com- 
 mentary to the same house without consulting 
 Southey, who first heard of it, as we have seen, 
 not from Llanthony, where Landor was now 
 living, but from London. Mr. Murray may have 
 asked him to look over the proof-sheets of the 
 work or rather of portions of it, for Southey 
 had not yet seen the Dedication or the Postscript 
 in the hope that the author might be induced by 
 a third party to tone down certain passages. This 
 at least seems a fair inference from letters which 
 have still to be quoted. 
 
 The first is Landor's reply, dated February 15, 
 1812, to his friend. Had he never mentioned, 
 he asked Southey, that he was writing this same 
 Commentary ? In truth, Landor proceeds, he had 
 a habit of not recollecting how much or how 
 little of his thoughts and intentions he had 
 imparted to his correspondents, to whom there- 
 
 1 See note on p. 146.
 
 ORIGIN OF THE "COMMENTARY" xi 
 
 fore he must sometimes appear the most barren 
 of tautologists and sometimes more reserved than 
 a Jesuit or a Quaker. What a mistake, though, 
 it was to judge people by their letters ; or, for 
 that matter, by anything they write. Look at 
 those letters of some eminent authors then recently 
 published, and how the world was taken in by 
 them. " Why," says Landor, " not twenty men 
 know that Addison and Pope abounded in the 
 worst basenesses, or that Swift was anything 
 better than a satirist and misanthropist." 
 
 But about the Commentary, Landor would do 
 precisely as Southey recommended. Would 
 Southey point out other passages which had 
 better be cancelled. It had come to be written, 
 Landor explained, in this way. He had been 
 trying to compose an oration which should be 
 more in the Athenian style than speeches delivered 
 in the English Parliament or the French Academy. 
 Beginning with an apology for praising the living 
 rather than the dead, he had pronounced a eulogy 
 on Warren Hastings, comparing him with Charles 
 James Fox but admitting that the great Indian 
 ruler might possibly have been deaf to the voice 
 of misery and of justice. Then he had compared 
 him with Lord Peterborough and likewise with 
 Wellington, proving to his own satisfaction that 
 Wellington was at any rate the equal either of 
 Peterborough or Hastings. But of what avail
 
 xii INTRODUCTION 
 
 to write orations in the Athenian or any other 
 
 style ? 
 
 " After all, who will read anything I write ? 
 One enemy, an adept in bookery and reviewship, 
 can without talents and without industry, suppress 
 in a great degree all my labour, as easily as a 
 mischievous boy could crush with a roller a whole 
 bed of crocuses. Yet I would not destroy what 
 I had written. It filled, indeed, but eight or nine 
 sheets ; interlined, it is true, in a thousand places 
 and everywhere close. I transferred, then, what- 
 ever I could conveniently, with some observations 
 I had written on Trotter's silly book, and preserved 
 nearly half, I think, by adopting this plan." 
 
 Landor is amazed that Mr. Murray should 
 object to publish his Dedication to Madison, 
 President of the United States. In his own 
 opinion it was a very temperate effusion, and, he 
 believes, not ineloquent. America had not de- 
 clared war against us yet ; as a matter of fact, 
 hostilities did not begin till the following summer ; 
 and Landor wished to point out what harm a 
 war would do to America. How deplorable that 
 free men should contend with the free ! The 
 Dedication was the best thing he had ever written, 
 and contained, he said, the best part of the afore- 
 said oration. He would ask Mr. Murray to send 
 it to Southey, along with a piece aimed at Saurin, 
 Attorney-General of Ireland, but not mentioning 
 that gentleman by name, nor subject, Landor
 
 HISTORICAL PARALLELS xiii 
 
 thinks, to the cognisance even of an Attorney- 
 General's law. As the piece in question is in 
 the Postscript to the Commentary and is in- 
 cluded in the present volume, the reader may 
 form his own opinion as to Landor's interpretation 
 of the law of libel. 
 
 Thus we have it from Landor that he had 
 composed an oration, portions of which he after- 
 wards incorporated in the Commentary and in a 
 Dedication prefixed to it. The parallels between 
 Warren Hastings and Fox and between the Earl 
 of Peterborough and Wellington appear to have 
 been discarded. I can find no trace of the former 
 in other works by Landor, but Peterborough has 
 an imaginary conversation with Lord Chatham, 
 and a remark made in the conversation between 
 Talleyrand and Louis XVIII. may have been 
 suggested by some passage in the missing parallel. 
 " Fortunate," the French statesman is made to 
 say, " that the conqueror of France bears no resem- 
 blance to the conqueror of Spain. Peterborough 
 (I shudder at the idea) would have ordered a file 
 of soldiers to seat your majesty in your travelling 
 carriage, and would have reinstalled you at 
 Hartwell." l 
 
 Very characteristic of Landor is the plea that his 
 memory a singularly retentive one was apt to 
 play him false. So also is the notion that Gifford, 
 
 1 Landor's Works ; iii. 388,
 
 xiv INTRODUCTION 
 
 editor of Tlie Quarterly Review, lay ever in wait 
 for him. Already, it will be noted, he had learnt 
 that Mr. Murray was uneasy about the Dedica- 
 tion. On this point there is other evidence. 
 Gifford, who was furious about Landor's pamph- 
 let, had written to Mr. Murray : " I never read 
 so rascally a thing as the Dedication. It shows 
 Landor to have a most rancorous and malicious 
 heart. Nothing but a rooted hatred of his country 
 could have made him dedicate his Jacobinical book 
 to the most contemptible wretch that ever crept 
 into authority" 1 James Madison, that is, President 
 of the United States. 
 
 One can but hope that Landor was spared the 
 perusal of this appreciation of his character. 
 Southey, it is plain, did his best to avert an 
 explosion. His reply to Landor's letter is a 
 masterpiece of tact. Writing on February 21, 
 1812, he told his friend that he had now read 
 the Dedication and Postscript, and found them 
 full of perilous stuff; but he stated his objections 
 so politely that even Landor could not have 
 taken offence. He thought Landor had " plucked 
 George Rose most unmercifully." As a matter 
 of fact, Southey declared, Rose had done more 
 good than the whole gang of reformers had even 
 proposed to do. "The encouragement of the 
 
 1 Memoirs of John Murray, 1891, i. 199. The American President 
 was spoken of more civilly by The Quarterly Review, April, 1878, in an 
 article on the life and times of President Madison.
 
 PERILOUS PASSAGES xv 
 
 benefit societies, the population and poor returns, 
 and the naval schools we owe to G. Rose." But 
 the passages which were either distinctly action- 
 able or likely, if published, to give their author 
 other cause for regret, were those, Southey wrote, 
 relating to Croker ; the recommendation for with- 
 holding supplies ; the mention of Lord Chatham, 
 Lord Riversdale, Fellowes, and Kett ; and what 
 was said of the Irish Attorney- General. Southey's 
 letter ended as follows : 
 
 " Your prose is as much your own as your 
 poetry. There is a life and vigour in it to which 
 I know no parallel. It has the poignancy of 
 champagne and the body of English October. 
 Neither you nor Murray gave me any hint that 
 the Commentary was yours, but I could not look 
 into these pages without knowing that it could 
 not be the work of any other man. God bless 
 you. R. S." 
 
 In the same letter Southey advanced the theory, 
 which sounds oddly enough now, that President 
 Madison was in the pay of Bonaparte. " The 
 American Government," he said, " dream of con- 
 quering Canada on the one hand, and Mexico 
 on the other ; and happy would Bonaparte be if 
 he could see them doing his work." 
 
 Lander's reply was dated March 2, 1812. He 
 perceived, he said, that Mr. Murray was inclined 
 to suppress the Commentary ; " whether for pay,
 
 xvi INTRODUCTION 
 
 or prejudice, or fear, I cannot tell." It had not 
 been advertised among forthcoming books, though 
 Mr. Murray had received it in December. As 
 for Southey's suspicions about Madison, Landor 
 could never believe that the President was in 
 Bonaparte's pay, or that Americans need be paid 
 to resent the indignities and hardships they suffered 
 under our tyrannical maritime laws. The Orders 
 in Council ought to have been revoked. " I pray 
 fervently to God," says Landor, "that no part 
 of America may be desolated ; that her wilder- 
 nesses may be the bowers and arbours of liberty ; 
 that the present restrictions on her commerce 
 may have no other effect than to destroy the 
 cursed trafficking and tricking which debases 
 the brood worse than felonies and larcenies ; and 
 that nothing may divert their attention from their 
 own immense neighbourhood, or from the de- 
 termination of helping to set free every town 
 and village of their continent." 
 
 A war, Landor went on to say, between England 
 and America would be a civil war ; a detestable 
 thing, only to be pardoned when there was some 
 ferocious and perfidious tyrant to be brought to 
 justice. The two peoples spoke the same language. 
 The Americans read Paradise Lost. Their children, 
 if not consumed with fire and sword, would indulge 
 their mild and generous affections in the perusal 
 of Southey's Curse of Kehama. Surely there
 
 AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER xvii 
 
 must still be in America many who retained in 
 all their purity the principles which had driven 
 their ancestors from England ; and one such 
 family, Landor declared, was worth all the tur- 
 bulent slaves and nobles in Poland, or all the 
 thoughtless heads devoted for Ferdinand VII. of 
 Spain. 
 
 A day or two after he despatched this letter, 
 Landor received from Southey further information 
 about Mr. Murray's attitude. Southey wrote : 
 
 " I have a letter this evening from Murray, 
 which I would enclose to you if it were not for 
 the time which would be lost in sending it round 
 for a frank. The sum of it is that it would relieve 
 his mind from some very natural and very un- 
 pleasant feelings if you would allow him to procure 
 another publisher for this Commentary, into whose 
 hands he will deliver it ready for publication, and 
 with whom he will settle for you. This is purely 
 a matter of feeling and not of fear. He is, on the 
 score of The Quarterly Review, under obligations 
 to Canning, and would on that account have 
 refused to publish any personal attack upon him. 
 The manuscript he never read, looking forward 
 to the perusal of the book as a pleasure. What 
 he wishes will be no inconvenience to you, and no 
 doubt you will readily assent to it. 
 
 " * I confess,' he says, ' I hesitatingly propose 
 this, for I fear even you could not now speak of 
 this to the author in any way that would not 
 offend him. I will, however, leave it entirely to 
 you ; and if you say nothing about it, I will publish
 
 xviii INTRODUCTION 
 
 it without any trouble to you or Mr. L., however 
 painful, from my peculiar situation, it will prove 
 to me.' These are his words. For my own part, 
 I should feel any fear of giving you offence as the 
 only thing which could occasion it. It is but for 
 you to signify your assent to Murray in a single 
 line, and the business is settled without any injury 
 to any person's feelings. That it is purely a matter 
 of feeling with him I verily believe. The not 
 reading the manuscript was a compliment to the 
 author, and a mark of confidence in him." 
 
 The late Dr. de Nod Walker, who knew Landor 
 well, told me that there were only three men whose 
 remonstrances the irascible genius could always 
 listen to without losing his temper. The amiable 
 Southey was one of them, Dr. Parr was doubtless 
 another, and Francis Hare may have been the 
 third. Southey 's letter, just now quoted, produced 
 nothing worse than a threat from Landor that he 
 would borrow 5,000 and start a private printing 
 press, whence could be issued, without the aid 
 or obstruction of publishers, pamphlets which 
 would set the public mind more erect, and throw 
 ministerial factions into the dust. As for the 
 Commentary it was condemned, he said, to eternal 
 night. He had just written to Mr. Murray and 
 sent Southey the extract from his letter. This is 
 what he had said : 
 
 "Deceived or not deceived, the fault was not 
 mine that you first undertook it yourself, that you
 
 "THAT SCOUNDREL CANNING" xix 
 
 next proposed to find another who would under- 
 take it, and that at last you relapse even from 
 that alternative. I am not surprised that, in 
 these circumstances, you find some vexation. Had 
 you in the beginning pointed out such passages 
 as you considered dangerous to publish (although 
 this very danger would have shown the necessity 
 of them), I would have given them another 
 appearance and stationed them in another place." 
 
 To Southey Landor imparted his conviction 
 that Mr. Murray had been persuaded to withdraw 
 from any part in the publication of the Commentary 
 " either by Canning or some other scoundrel whom 
 I have piquetted in the work." This ingenious 
 theory is followed by some remarks on the law 
 of libel. Landor had been reading the corre- 
 spondence of Erasmus. " How infinitely more 
 freedom," he observes, " as well as more learning, 
 was there in those days ! " What now was to be 
 desired, he thought, was to adopt the principle 
 ne quid falsi dicere audeat, ne quid veri non 
 audeat. In other words, there should be no 
 libel without falsehood. Landor winds up with 
 a hit at the followers of the late Mr. Fox, saying : 
 
 "It is delightful to see how the Foxites have 
 disabled themselves from serving the Regent. 
 The people will be able to pay taxes two years 
 more, and these fellows will then excite them 
 to some expression of their discontent ; they will 
 force themselves into the places of Government ;
 
 xx INTRODUCTION 
 
 they will govern with as much corruption and 
 fraudulence as their predecessors ; and as much 
 timber will be wanted for gibbets as for fleets." 
 
 To return to the Commentary. " Condemned 
 to eternal night " was Lander's own verdict ; and 
 but for an accident, the sentence would have been 
 executed. Southey, however, as we have seen, 
 kept a copy of it which passed, after his death, 
 into the hands of Lord Houghton. What that 
 lover of books and excellent critic thought of 
 it we know from his essay on Lander's life and 
 works first published in The Edinburgh Review, 
 and reprinted, with additions, in Monographs. It 
 contains, he wrote, "perhaps more fair and 
 moderate political and literary judgments, delivered 
 in his own humour, than any work of his earlier 
 or maturer years. It should be reprinted in 
 any new edition of his collected works." Lord 
 Houghton quoted more than one vigorous passage 
 from the Commentary, considering that these 
 were not inapplicable to the contests and difficulties 
 of the time when he himself was writing. It is 
 not impossible that the reader may light upon 
 other passages which have their bearing on the 
 questions of our own day. 
 
 Landor, when he wrote the Commentary, was 
 a man of six and thirty. He was living with 
 his young wife who was not at all interested 
 cither in politics or literature in the wilds of
 
 LANDOR AS A SOLDIER xxi 
 
 Llanthony, his Welsh estate. Already known 
 to men of letters, or to some of them, as the 
 author of Gebir, that curious romance of the 
 Hyksos invaders of Egypt, he had also published 
 a volume or two of occasional poetry, much of it 
 in Latin, and at the instigation of Sir Robert 
 Adair and Dr. Parr had contributed political 
 articles to The Courier. In 1808, laying aside 
 the pen for the sword, he had gone, well furnished 
 with money, to aid the Spaniards in their struggle 
 against Bonaparte. On reaching Coruna he gave 
 ten thousand reals to the cause and, raising a 
 troop of volunteer cavalry, set out to join the 
 Spanish general, Don Joachim Blake. 
 
 When Spain from base oppression rose, 
 I foremost rushed against her foes 
 
 he says in one of his poems ; but, with the 
 exception of a few skirmishes, he saw no fighting, 
 and returned to England, with the honorary 
 rank of Colonel in the Spanish army, before the 
 close of the year. The adventure must be recalled 
 because it helps to explain some of the references 
 in the Commentary to the operations in the 
 Peninsula. 
 
 The three years that followed Landor's Spanish 
 campaign were spent at Bath and Llanthony. Dur- 
 ing this time he wrote Count Julian: a Tragedy, 
 spent large sums on projects for developing his
 
 xxii INTRODUCTION 
 
 Welsh estate, and married. Early in the spring 
 of 1811 he was at a ball in the Bath Assembly 
 rooms, and, his eye falling on an unknown beauty, 
 he had exclaimed : " By heaven ! that's the nicest 
 girl in the room, and I'll marry her." The wedding 
 took place about the end of May, 1 and before the 
 close of the year Landor was at work on the 
 Commentary. 
 
 Lander's allusions elsewhere to Charles James 
 Fox are not numerous, and the more important 
 ones may be quoted. In his Imaginary Conver- 
 sation with an English visitor at Florence he 
 represents himself as saying : 
 
 " I believe there has rarely been a weaker or a 
 more profligate statesman than Mr. Fox : but he 
 was friendly and affectionate ; he was a gentleman 
 and a scholar. When I heard of his decease, and 
 how he had been abandoned at Chiswick by his 
 colleagues in the ministry, one of whom, Lord 
 Grey, he had raised to notice and distinction, I 
 grieved that such indignity should have befallen 
 him. . . . Many were then lamenting him, all who 
 had ever known him personally; for in private life 
 he was so amiable that his political vices seemed 
 to them but weaknesses." 
 
 In what he called " Reflections on Athens at 
 the death of Pericles," printed with the first 
 
 1 The register of St. James's Church, Bath, has the following entry : 
 May 24, 1811, Walter Savage Landor to Julia Thuillier, a minor, of 
 Walcot. Witnesses, James Thuillier, Thos: Barrow, Susan Amyatt.
 
 SOME OPINIONS ON FOX xxiii 
 
 edition of his Pericles and Aspasia, Landor said 
 of Fox : 
 
 " He was unlucky in all his projects. On one 
 occasion he said he had a peace in his pocket, when 
 he no more had a peace in it than he had a guinea. 
 He was, however, less democratic, less subversive 
 of social order and national dignity, than his rival." 
 
 In the letter to The Examiner, which has already 
 been referred to, Landor wrote : 
 
 " My intimacy with the friends and near relatives 
 of Mr. Fox would certainly have closed my lips 
 against the utterance of the appellation of scoundrel 
 in regard to him. He had more and warmer 
 friends than any statesman upon record : he was 
 the delight of social life, the ornament of domestic. 
 Mr. Fox was a man of genius, and (what in the 
 present day is almost as rare) a gentleman." 
 
 An epigram on Fox will be found among Landor 's 
 Latin poems. 
 
 In reprinting the Commentary it has been thought 
 better to break it up into chapters, to provide a few 
 notes, and to expand the extracts from Trotter's 
 Memoirs which, though widely read at the time, 
 are now little known. The additions made to the 
 extracts are within brackets ; the footnotes, chapter 
 and page headings, table of contents and index 
 are all new. A few corrections in the text have 
 been made from Landor's own list of errata. With 
 one or two exceptions his spelling has been followed,
 
 xxiv INTRODUCTION 
 
 but it seemed an excess of pedantry to repeat such 
 solecisms as Charlcsis, Foods, Gustavusis, for the 
 usual form of the possessive case. A couple of 
 lines in his poem of " Gunlaug and Helena " were 
 thus printed in the earlier editions: 
 
 ! could I loose our blissis bar, 
 I burn for wedlock and for war. 
 
 In the rare Simonidea, where the poem is first 
 found, he appends a note saying: 
 
 " I am forced to adopt here the oldest and best 
 form of spelling. In future I shall employ it with- 
 out force. It is impossible that one s following 
 another should make a separate syllable, though it 
 might be the sign of one." 
 
 The collected edition of Landor's Works referred 
 to in the notes is that brought out by Mr. Forster 
 in 1876. 1 Landor's Letters addressed to Lord 
 Liverpool on the Preliminaries of Peace, which are 
 once or twice quoted, were published anonymously 
 in 1814; but the book is not in the British Museum, 
 and I have only met with two copies of it, one of 
 which, with corrections in the author's handwriting, 
 I found among other papers in Landor's writing- 
 desk. Other works cited in the notes will be 
 well known ; except, perhaps, a pamphlet entitled : 
 Circumstantial Details of the Long Illness and Last 
 
 1 The Works and Life of Walter Savage Landor. Chapman & Hall, 
 1876.
 
 A SCARCE VOLUME xxv 
 
 Moments of the Right Hon. Charles James Fox, 
 together with Strictures on his Public and Private 
 Life, dedicated to Lord Morpeth. Second edition, 
 1806. 
 
 The collation of the copy of the Commentary in 
 Lord Crewe's possession is as follows : Octavo, 
 5 J by 8^ inches. Fly-leaf with Lord Houghton s 
 manuscript note on the reverse ; short title (with 
 blank reverse), pp. i-ii ; title-page (with blank 
 reverse), pp. iii-iv ; Dedication, pp. v-xiii ; p. xiv 
 is blank ; Advertisement, pp. xv, xvi ; Preface, 
 pp. i-xxxv ; p. xxxvi is blank ; Text, pp. 37-227 ; 
 an unnumbered page of errata and a blank leaf. 
 The imprint at the foot of the page of errata 
 reads : " T. Davison, Lombard Street, Whitefriars, 
 London." 
 
 S. W.
 
 COMMENTARY 
 
 ON 
 
 MEMOIRS OF MR. FOX
 
 COMMENTARY 
 
 ON 
 
 MEMOIRS OF ME. Fox 
 
 LATELY WEITTEN 
 
 LONDON 
 
 PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR BY 
 T. DAVISON, LOMBARD STREET, FLEET STREET 
 
 AND SOLD BY J. MURRAY, FLEET STREET 
 1812
 
 DEDICATION 
 
 TO THE 
 
 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 
 
 THE volume, Sir, which I offer to your attention 
 is written by a man who has neither hopes nor 
 fears from any faction in this country ; who never 
 served any, who never courted any. In com- 
 menting on the Memoirs of Mr. Fox, it must 
 refer occasionally to his adversary. It contains 
 such observations as experience would suggest on 
 the conduct of those two statesmen, 2 whose talents 
 a little while since appeared the most conspicuous ; 
 but who now, on their barren eminences, serve 
 only to light up a beacon for their countrymen, 
 not to mistake a torrent of eloquence, or a brilli- 
 ancy of reply, for the characteristics of wisdom 
 and the tests of policy. Unhappily, each of these 
 ministers hath left his party and his advocates 
 
 1 James Madison, fourth President of the United States ; elected 
 1809, re-elected 1813. 
 
 1 William Pitt, the younger, and Charles James Fox. 
 
 5
 
 6 DEDICATION 
 
 behind him, and on] the system of the one or the 
 other will the government of this kingdom be 
 conducted. Each faction is aware of its errors, 
 yet considers it a just homage to the memory 
 of its prophet to toil through the same wilderness 
 unto their natural termination. 
 
 Although the country groans under heavier 
 taxes than the most rapacious invader ever imposed 
 on the conquered ; although from this little island, 
 in a period of adverse and of hopeless war, 1 more 
 is confiscated than was extorted by Nero 2 himself, 
 amidst all his prodigalities, from the whole world 
 at peace ; yet the partizans of every administra- 
 tion talk of the prudence and successes of their 
 respective leaders. We have a surer criterion. 
 Supposing a country not to be actually, nor to 
 have lately been, in the occupation of an enemy, 
 there is one infallible way of judging whether a 
 ruler rules it well or otherwise. Are the people in 
 abundance ? in security ? If they are, they are 
 well governed. If they are not, and have not been 
 for several years, and are not likely to be for 
 several years more, then have they been, and are 
 
 1 Speaking of William Pitt, Mr. Lecky says: "Until his death 
 English operations on the Continent present few features except those 
 of extreme costliness and almost uniform failure." England in the 
 Eighteenth Century, v. 347. 
 
 1 " Italy, in the time of Nero, contained, at the lowest calculation, 
 twenty-six millions of inhabitants, and did not pay so much in taxes 
 as the city of London, with its appurtenances, 'in the late war." 
 LANDOR, Imag. Conv., 1826, ii. 157.
 
 THE SCOURGE OF WAR 7 
 
 too surely, not under a moderate, and equable, and 
 protecting government, but under a cruel, de- 
 grading, and ignominious subjection. It is their 
 indefeasible right and bounden duty to destroy it, 
 by withholding all supplies 1 from their taskmasters, 
 and cutting off all resources. Far be every such 
 condition of things from England and America. 
 
 I presume to dedicate this book to the wisest 
 and most dignified chief magistrate that presides in 
 the present day over the destinies of a nation, 
 because on his humanity and power, the little 
 freedom that remains among his fellow-creatures 
 now principally depends. 
 
 You have witnessed, Sir, how dreadful has been 
 the scourge of war, to countries less deserving and 
 less capable of liberty than America. To bemoan 
 it for the horrors of death and the pangs of 
 separation would be only to raise the animal cry 
 common to our species in all ages ; but the wars 
 arising from the French revolution have been 
 wars against all social and liberal principles, all 
 virtues, all conscience. Wherever they have ex- 
 tended no man has a home, no man has a country ; 
 old attachments are torn away, new ones are dis- 
 couraged. Between the government of Napoleon 
 and the British, no people is permitted to regulate 
 its own affairs, to renovate or strengthen its 
 
 1 Southey wanted to omit "the recommendation to withhold 
 supplies." FOBSTEB'S Landor, i. 362.
 
 8 DEDICATION 
 
 institutions, to chastise, or correct, or abolish, its 
 abuses. We rivet the chain, he breaks the limb in 
 striking the link asunder. 
 
 Your importance, your influence, and, I believe, 
 your wishes, rest entirely on the comforts and 
 happiness of your people. A declaration of 
 hostilities against Great Britain 1 would much and 
 grievously diminish them, however popular it 
 might be in the commencement, however glorious 
 it might be in the result. My apprehension lest 
 this popularity should in any degree sway your 
 counsels is the sole reason by which I am deter- 
 mined in submitting to you these considerations. 
 Popularity in a free state like yours, where places 
 are not exposed to traffic, nor dignities to accident, 2 
 is a legitimate and noble desire ; and the prospects 
 of territory are, to nations growing rich and 
 powerful, what the hopes of progeny are to in- 
 dividuals of rank and fortune. A war between 
 America and England would at all times be a 
 civil war. Our origin, our language, our interests, 
 are the same. Would it not be deplorable, would 
 it not be intolerable to reason and humanity, 
 that the language of a Locke and a Milton should 
 
 1 The American declaration of war against England was signed by 
 President Madison on June 18, 1812. 
 
 1 "Dignities exposed to accident." When the Duke of Richmond, 
 in the House of Lords (June 14, 1779) taunted Thurlow with his low 
 birth, the Chancellor retorted by suggesting that the noble lord was 
 "the accident of an accident." STANHOPE'S History of England, vi. 
 262.
 
 ENGLAND AND AMERICA 9 
 
 convey and retort the sentiments of a Bonaparte 
 and a Robespierre ? Your merchants have endured 
 much privation and much injury ; but their capital 
 has only been thrown back on their own country, 
 and given a fresh vigour to the truest and most 
 practical independence. You have all the requisite 
 materials, and nearly all the requisite hands, for 
 manufacturing whatever you can consume. Nothing 
 but a war can prevent the complete and almost 
 immediate attainment of this object. Consider, 
 Sir, what are the two nations if I must call 
 them two which are about, not to terminate, 
 but to extend their animosities by acts of violence 
 and slaughter. If you think as I do and free 
 men, allowing for the degree of their capacities, 
 generally think alike you will divide the creatures 
 of the Almighty into three parts : first, men 
 who enjoy the highest perfection of liberty and 
 civilisation ; secondly, men who live under the 
 despotism of one person or more, and are not 
 permitted to enjoy their reason for the promotion 
 of their happiness ; and thirdly, the brute creation, 
 which is subject also to arbitrary will, and whose 
 happiness their slender power of reasoning (for 
 some power they have) is inadequate to promote. 
 These three classes, in my view of the subject, 
 stand at equal distances. I confess, the utter 
 extinction of the whole Chinese empire, and of 
 every mortal in it, would affect me infinitely less 
 
 2
 
 10 DEDICATION 
 
 than the slaughter of a thousand Tyrolese, with 
 the subjugation of the remainder. 1 Because in a 
 series of years the one country would be covered 
 again, like the surface of a pond, with its minute 
 and indistinguishable leaves, as at present, or men 
 more conscious of their dignity would succeed. 
 But the other would impress the rising generation 
 with a memorable and most disheartening example, 
 how futile and vain may be the aspirations of 
 virtue, how sterile may be the love of our 
 country, how triumphant and insuperable may be 
 despotism. 
 
 Providence hath ordained you, Sir, not only to 
 preside over the United States, but to watch with 
 vigilance, and to protect with jealousy, the welfare 
 of a whole continent. Indeed, the peace and 
 prosperity of your own people require that all 
 your neighbours should enjoy the same equality 
 of laws, the same freedom from foreign and 
 turbulent and conflicting governments. In the 
 struggle of Spain for independence, it would have 
 been unjust and wicked to have detached from 
 her the Southern colonies. That independence is 
 now impossible, 2 because it is unwished. Instead 
 of aiming her whole force against the usurper, 
 
 1 " I can never be induced to imagine that the extinction of all the 
 tribes in Africa, and all in Asia, with half of the dwellers in Europe, 
 would be so lamentable as the destruction of Missolonghi, or even as 
 the death of Bozzaris. " LANDOB, Works, vi. 294. 
 
 1 Chili declared its independence of Spain in 1810. Paraguay rose 
 against the Spanish yoke in the following year.
 
 THE SPIRIT OF LIBERTY 11 
 
 she has directed great part of it to subdue the 
 spirit of liberty in that hemisphere where alone 
 the spirit of liberty never will be subdued. You 
 have little necessity and little time for deliberation. 
 Terminate the sufferings, confirm the hopes, fulfil 
 the ardent, the incessant wishes of a gallant and 
 grateful people ; and never let the repairer of 
 rotten cabinets crush it under the lumber of the 
 Bourbons. If hostilities should be the consequence 
 of this glorious resolution you will have secured 
 to your interests a warlike and powerful and 
 immovable ally on your own borders, and every 
 wise and every free man in all quarters of the 
 world will call heaven to witness the justice of 
 your cause, and pray most devoutly for your 
 success.
 
 ADVERTISEMENT 
 
 THE appearance of this work has been delayed 
 some time by the scruples and remonstrances of 
 the Publisher. Finally, the Author chose rather 
 to cancel much than to alter any thing ; he 
 chose, in many instances, rather not deliver his 
 sentiments at all, than to deliver them hesitatingly 
 and ineffectually. For, indeed, what is integrity 
 but wholeness ? and how can a writer be said to 
 have spoken the truth, if he hath absconded 
 from any part of it ; if he hath exposed and 
 abandoned it to misconstructions, leaving it liable 
 to receive a fresh and different impression from 
 every tide of humour and opinion ? To fall short 
 of it is as criminal as to exceed it ; and pecu- 
 liarly and miserably base is it, to be terrified 
 into dumbness by loud outcries or by the peril of 
 laws falling down upon us, from the alleys and 
 by-paths we must go through. At the same time, 
 it is neither wise nor decorous to draw a crowd 
 after us of 
 
 Some in rags, and some in tags, 
 And some in silken gowns? 
 
 to raise a reputation by working on the discom- 
 posed passions of the many, or on the weak 
 reasonings of the more. 
 
 1 The old nursery rhyme, beginning : " Hark ! hark ! the dogs do 
 bark, the beggars are come to town." 
 
 13
 
 PREFACE 
 
 WHEN an author writes on any political sub- 
 ject, he begins by assuring the reader of his 
 impartiality. In presenting to the public my 
 Commentary on the Memoirs of Mr. Fox, I think 
 it necessary to premise what will probably seem 
 very different from this custom and this object. 
 I would represent his actions to his contempo- 
 raries as I believe they will appear to posterity. 
 I would destroy the impression of the book before 
 me, because I am firmly persuaded that its 
 tendency must be pernicious. The author is an 
 amiable man ; so was the subject of his memoir. 
 But of all the statesmen who have been concerned 
 in the management of our affairs during a reign 
 the most disastrous in our annals, the example 
 of Mr. Fox, if followed up, would be the most 
 fatal to our interests and our glory. The proofs 
 and illustrations of this assertion will be evident 
 on perusing the Commentary. There is no con- 
 stitutional principle which he has not, at one 
 time, defended, at another time assailed. The 
 
 15
 
 16 PREFACE 
 
 preservation of the King's dominions in Germany, 
 he said, was folly and madness in Mr. Pitt ; in 
 his own administration he had the impudence to 
 assert, that Hanover should be as dear to an 
 Englishman as Hampshire. 1 A clear proof to 
 what extent he knew the interests, or consulted 
 the feelings, of Englishmen. Pensions and sine- 
 cures were abominations. 2 He kisses the King's 
 hand, and sees his name written out fairly again, 
 above its old erasure, 3 and shuffles into the House 
 to confirm the greatest sinecure of all, and the 
 most flagrant instance of ungenerous cupidity that 
 any red-book in Europe has unfolded. That a 
 man should be made auditor of his own accounts 
 
 1 But it was William Pitt the elder, not Mr. Fox, who said that 
 Hanover ought to be as dear to us as Hampshire. This was one of the 
 ' ' strong expressions " which he used when, in 1757, he brought down to 
 the House a message from George II. asking for aid in the defence of 
 the Electoral dominions, and moved for a grant of 200,000. " One 
 cannot say which was most ridiculous," Horace Walpole wrote, 
 " the richest prince in Europe begging alms for his country, or 
 the great foe of that country becoming its mendicant almoner." 
 WALPOLE, Memoirs of George II., ii. 313. See STANHOPE, History of 
 England, iv. 90. 
 
 2 In the House of Commons, on March 13, 1797, Fox reproached 
 Pitt and Grenville with securing sinecures to themselves, while they 
 were loading the people with taxes. 
 
 1 " On the 9th of May [1798] a Board of Privy Council being held at 
 St. James's, Mr. Faulkner, as Clerk of the Council, presented the list 
 to the King when his Majesty with his own hand drew his pen across 
 the name of Mr. Fox. Mr. Fox, in his private letters, refers to this 
 event with great equanimity. ' I believe,' he says, ' the late Duke of 
 Devonshire is the only instance in this reign of a Privy Councillor 
 being turned out in England."' STANHOPE'S Pitt iii. 128. Fox, who 
 had been made a Privy Councillor in March, 1782, was removed in 
 1798 for having proposed, at a dinner, the toast of ' ' our sovereign, the 
 people." He was reappointed on February 5, 1806.
 
 PRECIPICE OF REVOLUTION 17 
 
 with the public, and receive a large salary for 
 this auditorship ; l that, in short, he should be paid 
 a large salary for receiving one, and for doing no 
 earthly thing else, is enough in itself to goad a 
 free people, laden and overburdened with debts, 
 to the precipice of revolution. It is an absurdity 
 so insulting to the understanding, as is not to be 
 paralleled in any book of mysticism. The pro- 
 posal of it evinces an injustice, a baseness, a 
 dereliction of principle, so brutally bare, obtrusive, 
 and unblushing, that, if there be any honest man 
 among his friends, and endowed with ordinary 
 prudence, let him skulk into the crowd and be 
 well supported by his party, or never cast a 
 stone at Mr. Pitt. 
 
 The conduct of the Whig minister 2 in regard 
 to Spanish America proves how wide is the 
 difference between a debater and a statesman, 
 between the versatile suitor of popularity and the 
 true lover of justice. To those who are still 
 
 1 Lord Grenville, having formed the Ministry of all the Talents 
 (February, 1806) in which he was First Lord of the Treasury, was per- 
 mitted by an Act (46 George III., c. 1) to execute the office of Auditor 
 of the Exchequer by deputy. He had held this sinecure, worth 4,000 
 a year, since February, 1794. See below, page 53. 
 
 * That Laudor held Fox responsible for the disasters which befell our 
 military adventures in South America is proved by what he says further 
 on (see page 126). The charge, however, is not supported by the 
 facts. It was Windham, and not Fox, who was to blame. et Mr. 
 Windham," Lord Holland wrote, " though he plumed himself on his 
 disdain of all popular clamours, had greatly heated his imagination with 
 the prospect of indemnifying ourselves in the new world for the dis- 
 appointments which we had sustained in the old." Further Memoirs of 
 the Whig Party, p. 112. 
 
 3
 
 18 PREFACE 
 
 gaping at his prophetic spirit, 1 I would remark, 
 that an ingenious man who takes the opposite 
 side of an argument, when rich and luxurious 
 tradesfolks are pricked and cockered into a war, 
 against a revolutionary and military nation, may 
 predict much mischief with much certainty. Mr. 
 Pitt, we are informed, was equally aware of it, 
 but resigned his opinion to preserve his power. 
 Such also is the mechanism of our polity: the 
 commencement of a war will always conciliate to 
 the interests of a minister a very large party of 
 the mercantile and monied, who are ready for 
 loans and contracts ; and the aristocracy is brought 
 closer to him by the innumerable posts and em- 
 ployments dependent or consequent on hostilities. 
 The pleasure of succeeding to this patronage was 
 not to be resisted by a set of people whose poverty 
 alone had made them patriots. 2 The freedom of 
 
 1 Fellowes, in The Critical Review for March, 1808, wrote of Fox : 
 ' ' His remonstrances, his exhortations and suggestions, like the pre- 
 dictions of Cassandra, to which they were often compared, were 
 neglected and despised till the time in which they might have been 
 executed had glided away. The history of the [French] revolutionary 
 war will bear testimony to the truth of this observation." 
 z Compare the lines in Landor's Gebir : 
 
 Here also those who boasted of their zeal, 
 And lov'd their country for the spoils it gave. 
 
 Book III., 286, 1st ed. 
 
 In the passage that follows, Landor refers to the ill-starred expedition 
 sent to Rio de la Plata, early in 1807, under General Whitelocke. 
 Buenos Ayres had been taken in June, 1806, by Sir Hope Popham 
 and General Beresford. The news reached England in September, and 
 extravagant hopes were excited of founding a British dominion in 
 South America. Whitelocke's expedition, in the early part of 1807, 
 ended in a crushing disaster.
 
 BUENOS AYRES 19 
 
 a vast continent, the alliance of a generous people, 
 the various products of a most fertile country, the 
 hopes held out and pledges given by the conquerors, 
 every sentiment of glory, every prospect of advan- 
 tage, every regard to the honour of those whose 
 intelligence, promptitude, and moderation had 
 secured the territory, must be resigned and 
 abandoned, that tax-gatherers, and excisemen, and 
 commissioners, and notaries, and purveyors, and 
 governors, and deputy-governors, and Heutenant- 
 governors and deputy-lieutenant governors, might 
 be appointed ; J none of them, however unimportant, 
 from the city or the colony, but from the insides 
 and outsides of the gaming-houses in St. James's 
 Street ; and that especial care should be taken, 
 not to conciliate our new subjects, but to provide 
 for all sorts and conditions of men the best fitted 
 to exhaust a country. The people did their duty : 
 may all people do the same ! They rose, and 
 crushed their oppressors. No inquiry was insti- 
 tuted at home, no culprit was punished, no 
 minister was arraigned. A wretched man, whose 
 tyranny and cowardice were notorious long before, 
 was declared unworthy of command, and this 
 
 1 Speaking in the House of Commons in June, 1807, Canning 
 denounced the late Ministry for their designs in South America. 
 Buenos Ayres, he said, had acquired a vast importance in their eyes, 
 not from its importance to the commerce, or navigation, or to the 
 general resources of the country, " but because it was a place 
 that afforded room for the appointment of collectors, comptrollers, 
 searchers, and tide-waiters."
 
 20 PREFACE 
 
 important discovery was communicated in the 
 Gazette. 1 
 
 Thus ended an expedition, sent out under the 
 same auspices as a former one to Quiberon, 2 and 
 another to Ferrol. 3 In one single chapter are 
 recorded the three most disgraceful transactions 
 in British history ; and the disgrace is neither in 
 the corruption or the fatuity which occasioned 
 the choice of the commanders, nor in their 
 cowardice and incapacity. These are only the 
 sewers through which it runs. It lies in the 
 basest of all fear: the fear of looking back, the 
 fear of stopping to acknowledge, or advancing 
 
 1 General Whitelocke, on his return from his disastrous expedition 
 to Buenos Ayres (1807), was tried by court martial, cashiered, and 
 declared unfit to serve the King in any capacity. " What Whitelocke 
 did in Buenos Ayres," The Spectator said the other day, " should still 
 bring a blush to our cheek." 
 
 3 The reference might be to the expedition of French Emigres to 
 Quiberon in 1795. < ' Windham, the new War Minister, built his 
 greatest hopes on an expedition of French aristocrats and malcontents 
 to Quiberon Bay ; but this force, sumptuously provided with money 
 and munitions of war, and supported by a powerful fleet, was pulverised 
 by Hoche as soon as it landed." LORD ROSEBERY'S Pitt, p. 131. Or was 
 Laudor thinking of Sir E. Pellew's attack on Quiberon Bay, June 4, 
 1800, when some French batteries were destroyed but we could not 
 reduce Fort Penthievre? 
 
 3 A British force under General Sir James Murray Pulteney was sent 
 against Ferrol in August, 1800. The troops landed, but Pulteney 
 thought the place too strong to be taken except by regular siege, and 
 re-embarked them. The naval officers thought the place might easily 
 have been captured. See LANDOR'S Imaginary Conversations. " Neither 
 the general nor any person under him knew its fortifications or its 
 garrison. They saw the walls and turned back, although the walls 
 on the side where they landed were incapable of sustaining one 
 discharge of artillery, and the garrison consisted of half a regiment.' 
 Works, vi. 24.
 
 WALCHEREN DISASTERS 21 
 
 to interrogate. When calamities come down so 
 thick together ; when merely the vile instrument 
 is broken and cast off, not the workman dismissed 
 for choosing and employing it ; when a general 
 is rewarded by appointing him minister of 
 war, 1 for no other services than flying from an 
 invalid garrison and dismantled fortress, what 
 hope is there of any thing prosperous, until 
 the elements of a state produce a change of 
 season ? I am afraid it is only by severe and 
 stormy weather that such a pestilence can be 
 stopped. 
 
 One party can accuse the other with equal 
 justice. Such being the case, no culprit of rank 
 and connections, no officer so high that his 
 criminality can involve our safety and our honour, 
 will be punished by any thing more severe than 
 verbal censure. Really it is ridiculous to talk of 
 disgracing, for instance, a man 2 who has had the 
 baseness to praise a naval officer to the people 
 and to malign him to the sovereign ; whose folly 
 and that of his defenders is so signal that nothing 
 but the hand of Providence could have stamped 
 
 1 Sir James Murray Pulteney became Secretary at War in 1807. 
 
 * A reference to General Lord Chatham, who commanded the troops 
 in the ill-fated expedition to Walcheren, 1809. On February 14, 
 1810, Lord Chatham "delivered clandestinely to the King a paper 
 justifying himself and in some degree inculpating the Navy and even 
 the Admiralty." LORD HOLLAND'S Further Memoirs of the Whig Party, 
 p. 33. The matter was referred to in the House of Lords five days 
 later. Landor's verses on Walcheren will be found in his Works, 
 viii. 43.
 
 22 PREFACE 
 
 it, nothing but the power of divine indignation 
 and justice could have driven them to the ex- 
 posure of his documents. If any such person is 
 known to exist at this moment, and not to be 
 out of favour, where favour is, or ought to be, 
 a reward for active and transcendent virtues, I 
 need make no apology for the force of my ex- 
 pressions. No name is mentioned ; T disclaim all 
 reference, all allusion. If the stigma flies forth 
 against any, it must be by its own peculiar 
 aptitude and attraction. According to the reports 
 which are prevalent, and which I would rather 
 refute than repeat, the quarters of a brave and 
 active officer were taken from him, he was cast 
 out to die amongst the pestilential marshes, that 
 the state turtles of this glutton might have a 
 commodious kitchen ! He was not to be disturbed, 
 or spoken to, or called on, until several hours 
 after noon ; he was not to be seen while he was 
 dressing ; he was not to be intruded on at his 
 breakfast ; he was not to be molested at his 
 dinner ; he was not to be hurried at his wine ; 
 he was not to be awakened at his needful and 
 hardly earned repose. 1 
 
 Commodus and Elagabalus ! Ye lived amongst 
 
 1 See Lander's Imaginary Conversations : <e Of our generals, the 
 most distinguished then employed was a body that rose from bed after 
 midday, of which when orders were requested, the first answer was, 
 His lordship is at breakfast ; the second, His lordship is at lunch ; the 
 third, His lordship is at dinner." Imag. Conv. 1824, i. 141. This 
 passage was afterwards transferred to another conversation, when the
 
 EXALTED DELINQUENTS 23 
 
 a coarse, reviling people ! Your memories have 
 been followed up, and hooted at, most inde- 
 corously ; we are taught better manners ; we see 
 such actions as yours, and hold our peace ! But 
 I should be more contented, I must acknowledge 
 it, if I could discover in history where any people 
 hath been so fortunate as to survive such delin- 
 quency in the higher officers of state ; if I could 
 find that nation in existence twenty years after 
 such politicians and such polity. This idea of 
 degradation and ruin stands so closely and so 
 awfully before me, I lose for a moment all view 
 of that vast colossus 2 which overshadows the 
 whole continent of Europe, and which will never 
 be considered as the cause, however he may be the 
 instrument, of our subjugation. If we had only 
 the weakest enemy, in addition to such corruption 
 at home, such oppression of taxes on the inter- 
 mediate ranks, such proscription of talents on 
 the one side, such prostitution on the other, and 
 such utter exclusion of all dissidents in religion, 
 when the national church is in a deplorable 
 minority, our ruin would be equally certain, though 
 somewhat longer delayed. 
 
 last answer became, " His lordship is dead drunk " ( Works, 1876, vi. 
 248). Lord Holland said of the general : " His indolence in office 
 had . . . become so notorious that he was nicknamed in the navy the 
 late Lord Chatham." Further Memoirs, p. 32. 
 
 8 Landor makes Pitt say : ' ( I have failed in every thing I undertook, 
 and have cast in solid gold the clay colossus of France." Works, iii. 
 188.
 
 24 PREFACE 
 
 With what contempt have we often spoken of 
 the Turks ! l yet the counsels of this people seem 
 to be more systematic than ours, amidst all then- 
 troubles and revolutions. Their defects have been 
 fewer and less calamitous, and, fanatics and mis- 
 creants as they are, their toleration has been less 
 circumscribed by bigotry. And yet the nation 
 whose sacred rights they think it necessary to 
 qualify, is open to the descents and insinuations 
 of a powerful and triumphant enemy. Let us not 
 deceive ourselves, and fancy we are rich, and 
 mighty, and unassailable, because we can still raise 
 money ; our methods of raising money are certain 
 signs of our necessities, and the power of raising it 
 is no proof of any power beyond. Nations have 
 trampled down their oppressors without coin and 
 without credit. Those who are angry that this 
 country, in which there are such splendid dinners 
 and crowded drawing-rooms, should be compared 
 with Turkey, must be reminded that pleasure and 
 wit are but fallacious symbols of eternity to a state. 
 
 The guests of Pompey, in his rich pavilion at 
 Pharsalia, looked down with disdain on Csesar the 
 last evening of their lives. But posterity is just, 
 even among the most vulgar and illiterate. A 
 
 1 " The only people of whom he [Landor] writes with constant respect 
 are the Turks : ' coming from Turkey to France was like passing from 
 lions to lap-dogs : they alone of all nations have known how to 
 manage the two only real means of happiness, energy and repose.'" 
 LORD HOUGHTON in Edinburgh Review, July, 1869, p. 244.
 
 CJESAR, POMPEY, BONAPARTE 25 
 
 little dog is universally called Pompey ; a great 
 dog, Caesar. We despise the character of Pompey, 
 in despite of some virtues ; we admire the charac- 
 ter of Caesar, in despite of many vices. Such an 
 effect hath superior energy on the soul of man. 
 Nature not only permits us, but commands us, to 
 reverence it, even when its direction is sinister 
 to our happiness. It is not from the traditionary 
 verbiage of pedagogues, who hate and love, despise 
 and admire, by prescription, that we feel animated 
 at the achievements of heroes. It is from the 
 intuitive and certain knowledge of our hearts, that 
 there is a conservate power within us, against 
 corruption and against violence ; and that nothing 
 good or glorious is impossible to those whose 
 strength and spirit are bent resolutely on the 
 exploit. Even bad men are viewed differently 
 from other bad men, by a force of mind. In 
 Bonaparte, it is evident that anger and a jealousy 
 allied to fear, are the predominant passions ; while 
 the fire-side inmates of his heart, if I may venture 
 on the expression, are cruelty and fraud sure pro- 
 geny of such parents. No vices can be imagined 
 more hateful. But he never deserts his allies, he 
 never abandons his object ; he bestows no rewards 
 on the idle, he shelters no coward from punish- 
 ment. If he is censurable, it is in the opposite 
 extreme : not only does he raise up merit whenever 
 he discovers it, but with a spirit which might be 
 
 4
 
 26 . PREFACE 
 
 called enthusiasm, if so revolutionary a conduct can 
 be spoken of so equivocally, he values it quite as 
 highly in the living as in the remotest of their 
 ancestors. By these means he has established his 
 own empire, and subverted others, which he never 
 could have done had his competitors adopted the 
 same. By the providence of God we have avoided 
 one vast mischief: we have not much extended 
 our dominions. To pave the road to conquests, 
 and to erect the outworks necessary for retaining 
 them, would consume almost all that is left to 
 us from the fragments of the constitution. 
 
 Although there may be some people so ignorant 
 and stupid as to believe that every act of coercion 
 is a proof of energy, and every enforcement of an 
 obsolete law a preservative of the rest, even those 
 men must be aware, from their own personal 
 feelings, that the less we expose of what is vulner- 
 able, the more is our bosom at peace. The Romans, 
 the Macedonians, and the French sunk under 
 despotism by their conquests ; and he who added 
 most to the dominions of each country added most 
 to its subjugation. Every free people, if it is wise 
 and powerful, will deprecate an accession of terri- 
 tory. In a state of successful war the prince 
 acquires new powers, bestows new offices, con- 
 ciliates new interests. Those who were under him 
 from their early days waste away in freedom as he 
 ascends in glory ; but in a nation whose laws are
 
 FRENCH HARPIES 27 
 
 unequal, each individual is relieved a little in 
 proportion as the dominions of the state extend. 
 Hence a tyrant becomes more popular for war, 
 although its expenditure, even when successful, 
 adds other privations to those of liberty. The 
 French lately were free, as much as any people 
 so light and ignorant can ever be. Two men of 
 transcendent abilities, Cambaceres and Talleyrand, 
 men unrestrained by any sense of religion or any 
 principle of morality, have instructed a soldier 
 of fortune how to govern and keep that people 
 in subjection. Under his vast encampment such 
 is France these harpies devour the prey they have 
 collected, with incessant clamours against English- 
 men, as foreigners who have rashly drawn the 
 sword, and invaded them during the festival of 
 the Continent. To become the companions of a 
 conqueror is enough to remove the disgrace of 
 subjugation. Whether this be the opinion of 
 philosophers I cannot tell, nor whether it be a 
 point of speculation with those who deprecate any 
 violence of speech, or action, against the emperor. 
 I believe that, mingled with fear and treachery, it 
 finds a place even there ; but certain I am that 
 it is the prevailing sentiment of those who have 
 overturned old empires and established new ; that 
 it is the universal maxim of ardent minds, and the 
 military creed of revolutionary Europe. Woe be- 
 tide the government that forces men to deliberate
 
 28 PREFACE 
 
 whether it be the more disgraceful to admit a 
 new dynasty, with economy and peace, or to 
 support an old establishment in irremediable cor- 
 ruption and in hopeless war. If ever the time 
 should arrive when the English must pay heavier 
 taxes, without attaining any proposed object, 
 than that object, if attained, would be worth ; 
 if nineteen in twenty should be so reduced 
 in circumstances that they cannot give their 
 children the same advantages of education and 
 of business as they themselves enjoyed ; it will 
 be then a duty to remove, by every effort and 
 at every peril, the causes, whatsoever they may 
 be, of so serious and mournful a calamity. It 
 will be their object and determination to render 
 it impossible for those who have brought about 
 such an evil to compass any more, or even to 
 make any attempt, however peaceable, for the 
 recovery of their possessions. Committees will 
 then be holden to decide on what has been 
 merited by public services, and to receive back 
 again what has been taken under false pretences. 
 A people conscious of its strength and dignity 
 will always be generous and mild : even the 
 French were not very ferocious, until they were 
 scourged and maddened by their wars. The idea 
 of vengeance has been too long associated with 
 the idea of retribution. England has wanted a 
 Cromwell and a Nassau ; she never has wanted
 
 WORDS OF BAD OMEN 29 
 
 a Robespierre or a Bonaparte. On the other hand, 
 never, since the extinction of the Tudors, has she 
 betrayed so much indifference to public virtue, or 
 such proneness to the most ignominious of all 
 subjection. The case proposed by Montesquieu is 
 no longer hypothetical : the if ever is blotted from 
 the problem. 
 
 The Cumaeans, it is said, had not the common 
 sense to know that they possessed the right of 
 standing under their own porticos when it rained ; 
 but, probably, in some very foul weather, they took 
 shelter under the most ample and most protect- 
 ing. Open tyranny is not the greatest of all 
 evils. It is better to contend against any thing, 
 however inhuman and monstrous it may be, 
 possessing force, however great, let it only be 
 visible and definite in every limb and motion, 
 than to be drawn under in the fat folds of some 
 overwhelming hydra, and to be sucked away 
 insensibly at its leisure. 
 
 We have been, I shall not say at what period, 
 in a situation analogous to this, and yet we have 
 addressed one another in high language. But 
 words of encouragement, too often repeated, are 
 words of bad omen. Far be it from me to lower 
 the spirit or to damp the hopes of the public. I 
 foretold, but it was in private, that Fox would 
 be aconite where Pitt was wormwood. The 
 disasters of the country began with this heaven-
 
 30 PREFACE 
 
 born minister; 1 happy were England had they 
 terminated with his heroic brother. The last of 
 these Dioscuri, by appearing on his war-horse at 
 the gate, gave warning to the wiser that the house 
 of their revels was about to fall. We have been 
 sitting like condemned criminals : the poison has 
 now deadened all the extremities, and is mounting 
 to the heart. Both parties have inveighed with 
 equal vehemence against the inequality and 
 insufficiency of our representative system ; both 
 projected, and both abandoned, the project of 
 reform. No person mixes in general society so 
 little as I do ; no man has kept himself so totally 
 detached from all factions ; yet I seldom meet a 
 person, whether on business or amusement, whether 
 a stranger or acquaintance, whose conversation does 
 not immediately turn on the calamities and dis- 
 graces we have suffered, and does not generally 
 end with the confession of an equal insufficiency, 
 in all who have been members of the cabinet. 
 
 In the beginning of the French revolution, when 
 the minds of men were heated by the rapidity 
 and importance of events, and when friendships 
 
 1 Mr. Gladstone, referring to the designation of Pitt as the ' ' heaven- 
 born minister," said in the House of Commons : ' ' I have understood 
 that that name came from the city of London at the time when Pitt 
 embarked this country in the unhappy policy of meeting the expenditure 
 of a revolutionary war, even from the first, by loan. " 
 
 According to Leigh Hunt, the Duke of Chandos, when Master of the 
 Horse, first applied the famous epithet to Pitt, ' ' which occasioned some 
 raillery." LEIGH HUNT'S Recollections of Byron, etc., ii. 67.
 
 PORTENTS OF REVOLUTION 31 
 
 were torn asunder by new and violent attractions 
 there still remained a delicacy of sentiment, and 
 a reluctance to touch that train which was liable 
 to such tremendous explosions. 1 At present there 
 is one common cause, and one universal opinion. 
 The leading men have been tried. The glebe is 
 effete ; the plough and harrow must go deeper ; 
 something new must be turned up ; but on the 
 same ground, and within the same inclosures. 
 We want fresh seed, and weightier, and sounder. 
 
 If ever there was a time when a revolution 
 would be disastrous, it is now ; if ever there was 
 one when it seemed inevitable, now is it. 2 What 
 are the signs and tokens of this awful visitation ? 
 Are they not suspended in the heavens, glaringly 
 visible, at the present hour ? Insolence and injus- 
 tice, imposture and self-sufficiency ; a prostration 
 of public virtue, an eye closed against inevitable 
 misfortune, an ear deaf to the most earnest 
 prayers of those who could profit but generally 
 by their advice, and a countenance which never 
 changes at the most irrefragable reproaches, and 
 the most deep disgrace. What can be expected 
 
 1 Landor, in one of his letters, says that Oebir was ' ' written in the 
 last century, when our young English heads were turned towards the 
 French Revolution, and were deluded by a phantom of Liberty, as if the 
 French could ever be free, or let others be." LANDOR'S Letters, etc., 
 1897, p. 135. 
 
 2 "This country," so wrote Southey, May 14, 1812, "is upon the 
 brink of the most dreadful of all conceivable states an insurrection of 
 the poor against the rich." Life of Southey, p. 282.
 
 32 PREFACE 
 
 from men who study not to be upright and 
 diligent in their offices, but merely con over 
 some petty cavil at their predecessors, and stoop 
 to ascertain, that they may reach, without ex- 
 ceeding, the limits of their iniquity? Is there 
 any one who has not been disgusted, and who 
 would not have been indignant formerly, when 
 the higher and more manly feelings had all their 
 painful play, at the recriminations of the opposite 
 ministers ? Virtue and truth lose their character- 
 istic loveliness when the veil is ript away by 
 such hands. When 'a Canning or a Castlereagh 
 tells us, with abhorrence, of a reversion or a 
 sinecure given to some abandoned gambler, by 
 the patron of his club, we are indeed indignant, 
 but not to our natural pitch : the sentiment flies 
 off in splinters, some on the giver, some on 
 the receiver, most on the accuser. We have 
 heard of family and of birth in parliament ; but, 
 if a nation is ruined, of what importance is it 
 whether it be ruined by a man of yesterday or 
 by a man of the day before ? The difference 
 is no greater, to those who survey the newest, 
 and the most ancient, at an equal elevation above 
 both. 
 
 To saunter with complacency, or with indiffer- 
 ence, by the channels of corruption, is not virtue. 
 It is only the Asiatic despot who is never to be 
 awakened from his slumber, when treachery is
 
 CORRUPT GOVERNMENT 33 
 
 lurking in his courts, and enemies are thundering 
 at his gates. Such images were poetry and fable 
 to our ancestors : no phantasmagoria could bring 
 them to their bosoms. Yet virtuous men are 
 inert and passive now. Speak to them of cor- 
 ruption, they do not blush to tell you it is 
 necessary ; government could not go on without 
 it ; we are not what we were ; should we not 
 ourselves like a place ? " Yes," I answer, " and 
 the time is approaching when every man will 
 have his own ; but I would conjure you to 
 withhold from me, and from all whom I deem 
 estimable, the sure means of becoming worse men." 
 I consider the amalgam of rottenness and 
 soundness as a much greater curse than all the 
 poverty and distress arising from ministerial 
 profusion. There is infinitely more misery in the 
 world from wickedness than from want ; but they 
 are two gamesters that play into each other's 
 hand. If the higher classes hold out a glaring 
 example of rapacity, they will meet either with 
 vengeance or with imitation from those who walk 
 below. Whichever may happen, the country is 
 the sufferer. We have contemplated such enor- 
 mities of crime and such anomalies of law l as 
 
 1 As late as 1823 Sir James Mackintosh, in moving a resolution on 
 the " barbarous criminal laws," said : " We had two hundred laws 
 inflicting capital punishment in our Statute-book, and yet never acted 
 on more than twenty of them." See also Landor's imaginary con- 
 versation between the Grand Duke Leopold and President Du Paty 
 
 5
 
 34 PREFACE 
 
 never were seen before in any land where the 
 images of liberty and justice, or even the naked 
 walls of a constitution, were left standing. If an 
 unfortunate mother, at a distance from home, 
 carrying with her a half-starved infant, along 
 roads covered with snow, should snatch a shirt 
 from a hedge to protect it from a miserable death, 
 she is condemned to die. That she never could 
 have known the law, that she never could have 
 assented to its equity, avails her nothing ; that 
 she was pierced by the cries of her own offspring ; 
 that it was not merely the instigation of want, 
 but the force of omnipotent nature, the very voice 
 of God himself, the preservation of a human 
 being, of her own, the cause of her wandering, 
 and her wretchedness, of her captivity and her 
 chains : what are these in opposition to an act 
 of parliament ? She dies. Look on the other side. 
 A nobleman of most acute judgment, 1 well versed 
 in all the usages of his country, rich, powerful, 
 
 (Works, iii, 51). In another conversation he makes Sir Samuel 
 Romilly say : " I am ready to believe that Draco himself did not 
 punish so many [offences] with blood as we do, though he punished 
 with blood every one indiscriminately." Works, iii. 163. 
 
 1 Henry Dundas, Lord Melville, for a long time Lord Privy Seal for 
 Scotland and President of the Board of Control for India. In 1785 
 he had carried a Bill to prevent the Treasurer of the Navy appropriating 
 public moneys to his private use, and in 1806 he was himself impeached, 
 but acquitted, on a charge of misappropriation. Landor attacked him 
 both in prose and verse. In the Apology for Satire (Poems, 1795) he 
 says : 
 
 " Invidious gods ! Why boasts the brave Dundas 
 A heart of iron and a face of brass ? " 
 
 See also the epigram in Lander's Works, viii. 124.
 
 LORD MELVILLE 35 
 
 commanding, with a sway more absolute and 
 unresisted than any of its ancient monarchs, the 
 whole kingdom in which he was a subject, with 
 all its boroughs, and its shires, and its courts, and 
 its universities, and, in addition, as merely a fief, the 
 empire of all India ; who possessed more lucrative 
 patronage than all the crowned heads in Europe. 
 Let this illustrious character, to whom so many 
 men of rank looked up as their protector, and 
 wiiom senators and statesmen acknowledged as 
 their guide ; let this distinguished member of the 
 British parliament break suddenly through the 
 law which he himself had brought into the House 
 for the conservation of our property, without 
 necessity, without urgency, without temptation 
 and behold the consequence. True, he is im- 
 peached, but all the evidence of his guilt he is 
 permitted to withhold, by a special decision in 
 his favour, and the answers he returns to those 
 who are authorised to examine him are evasive 
 and jocose. One honest man, Admiral Nichols, 1 
 Controller of the Navy, scandalised at such scenes 
 of iniquity, hopeless of reforming them, and dis- 
 daining to sanction by his name and presence the 
 belief that a single act of fraud and peculation 
 
 1 Landor refers elsewhere to the conduct of Admiral Nichols : 
 " Finding no support, he threw up his office as Controller of the 
 Navy, and never afterwards entered the House of Commons." Works, 
 iv. 429. In the same conversation the Admiral is described as "a 
 just, a valiant, and a memorable man " (76. p. 427).
 
 36 PREFACE 
 
 had been examined as it should be, threw up 
 his office instantaneously and retired from such 
 unworthy associates. 
 
 He resigned his place for no other reason 
 than because he was most fit for it, and for the 
 same reason I have often wondered how he ever 
 came to occupy it. Men are in governments 
 what words are in eloquence ; their position, their 
 relation, and their intrinsic qualities must be 
 considered. He who, with a fair-flowing wig, 
 might appear a respectable special pleader, 1 may 
 be incapable of coping with the impetuous and 
 versatile Bonaparte ; he who understands the 
 merit of a turtle and the duties of a toast-master 
 may be unsuccessful in his attacks both on his 
 enemies and his comrades ; those who write in- 
 genious and sharp satires may hope to arrive at 
 the glory of pretty smart duellists, may even be 
 
 1 The wearer of the ' ' fair flowing wig " was Spencer Perceval ; 
 the expert in turtles, General Lord Chatham ; the writer of sharp 
 satires and promising duellist, Canning. See Sydney Smith, in Peter 
 Plymley : " You tell me I am a party man. I hope I shall always be so 
 when I see my country in the hands of a pert London joker [Canning] 
 and a second-rate lawyer [Perceval]. Of the first, no other good is 
 known than that he makes pretty Latin verses ; the second seems to 
 me to have the head of a country parson and the tongue of an Old 
 Bailey lawyer." S. SMITH'S Works, 1850, p. 491. 
 
 Landor, who disliked Canning, refers to his ignorance of French and 
 to his duel with Castlereagh in the verses beginning : 
 tc Canning, in English and in Latin strong, 
 Was quite an infant in each other tongue. 
 Proud, yet an easy embassy he sought 
 From the kind comrade he traduced and fought." 
 
 Dry Sticks, p. 147.
 
 LESSONS OF HISTORY 37 
 
 taught dancing and french, however late ; but 
 they have yet to be informed that the arrangement 
 of a campaign is different from the construction 
 of a pentameter. 
 
 I never shall think it presumptuous to offer 
 such advice and such warning as men of reflection 
 are able to derive, and authorised to deliver, from 
 the experience of past ages. Those who are 
 ignorant whence arises the utility of history 
 cannot be supposed to be perfectly well informed 
 whence arises the pleasure it bestows. Believe 
 me, it is not a series of sieges and battles, of 
 dangers and escapes, of turns and reverses of 
 fortune, by which we are delighted : it is because 
 for the moment we fancy we have acquired so 
 much wisdom as would direct us in similar 
 situations ; it is a consciousness of knowledge and 
 a confidence of security. The mind is captivated 
 by these impressions, and proceeds without further 
 inquiry. No two human beings ever profited less 
 by them than Mr. Pitt and Mr. Fox. 
 
 In the beginning of the war, the minister had 
 two objects : to preserve the balance of Europe, 
 and to maintain the constitution of the realm. 
 The idea of the balance of Europe was taken from 
 the states of Italy, but it is proper and requisite 
 to have a correct notion how it was managed. 
 " Questi potentati avenano ad avere due cure prin- 
 cipali : 1'una, che un forestiero non entrasse in
 
 38 PREFACE 
 
 Italia con armi ; 1'altra che nessuno di loro occupasse 
 piu stato." 1 Such are the words of Machiavelli. 
 At the commencement of the French revolution, 
 all the more extensive states of Europe seemed 
 ready to resolve themselves into their component 
 parts. The conjunctures of this period seemed to 
 portend that what we had been waging so many 
 wars to bring about would be accomplished by its 
 own conflicting elements. The conceptions of the 
 great disposer were swelling into full maturity. 
 The minister of the day laboured himself into 
 blindness 2 by striving to undo what he would, if 
 he could have seen one inch before him, have 
 considered his highest glory, and his most per- 
 manent blessing, to have achieved. The spirit of 
 liberty was abroad, and the sound of it was 
 tremendous when it flashed into those quarters 
 where there was none. If Mr. Pitt found it or 
 made it requisite to coerce the new opinions, it was 
 his policy to keep a formidable force within the 
 realm, surely not to send it out. It would also 
 have been in readiness, and without exciting any 
 previous suspicion, to take advantage of whatever 
 calamity might befall the infant republic. Pur- 
 
 1 Machiavelli, // Principe, cap. xi. Elsewhere Landor gives the 
 English : " Machiavelli, in speaking of the Italian league says, ' These 
 potentates had two principal views : one that no foreigner should enter 
 Italy in arms ; the other, that none of the princes or states should 
 attempt an increase of territory.' " Letters to Lord Liverpool, p. 64. 
 
 2 Landor may be referring to Lord North, whose sight, however, 
 began to fail in 1787, and who soon afterwards became totally blind.
 
 BALANCE OF POWER 39 
 
 suing quite a different plan, he succeeded in 
 nothing but in preventing the demolition of the 
 French monarchy, which, under another and more 
 formidable dynasty, has swallowed up all the rest. 
 The balance of Europe would have been settled 
 to the full satisfaction of its most romantic admirers 
 if we never had entered into a continental war, for 
 it is certain that the Netherlands would have thrown 
 off the yoke both of Austria and of France. This 
 one event would have preserved the balance ; no 
 other could. But a court war was necessary to 
 create that danger in the midst of which ah 1 
 clamours for reform were to be stifled. A sense 
 of common danger united all parties in France, 
 who now began to see clearly that the dismember- 
 ment of their country was intended. Valenciennes 1 
 was taken in the name of the emperor of Germany, 
 and the West Indian islands 2 were surrendered to 
 
 1 After a siege lasting nearly four weeks, the Duke of York, on 
 July 26, 1793, took possession of Valenciennes on behalf, not of the 
 French royal family, but of the Emperor. See Fox's speech in the 
 House of Commons, March 24, 1795 : " When we took Valenciennes, 
 instead of taking it for Louis XVII., we took possession of it in the 
 name of the Emperor Francis. When Conde surrendered, we did the 
 same thing. . . . Was it possible for any man to be so ignorant as to 
 doubt what our intentions were ? How, then, was it possible to suppose 
 that our conduct would produce on the inhabitants of France an effect 
 different from what it has done ? " 
 
 1 Fox said, in the speech quoted in the last note : " When Sir 
 Charles Grey and Sir John Jervis took Martinique, Guadaloupe, and 
 the rest of the French West India islands, did they take possession of 
 them for Louis XVII. ? No ! but for the King of Great Britain, not 
 to be restored to France when monarchy and regular government 
 should be restored, but to be retained as conquests if the chance of 
 war should leave them in our hands."
 
 40 PREFACE 
 
 the king of Great Britain. The principles laid 
 down in our Bill of Rights were disclaimed and 
 reprobated, and it was understood universally 
 throughout Europe that England was hostile to 
 every people which might assert its ancient freedom. 
 Sceptres and crowns were soon trodden into the 
 dust, and we had nothing else in any country on 
 our side. Hence the preponderating power con- 
 tinued so, in our despite and its own. The present 
 state of Europe was fixt and settled, though 
 ignorance and prejudice concealed it from our 
 eyes, at the moment we declared hostilities. At 
 that instant the Destinies shook over Europe the 
 imperial mantle, and held up the iron crown. 
 Anarchy might have split France into fragments. 
 We warred against this only sure ally, and estab- 
 lished the military despotism we have ever since 
 been struggling to overthrow. Not a movement 
 of ours but fixes it more firmly ; not a shilling 
 we expend in other countries but goes ultimately 
 to its support. If our military and naval forces 
 were appointed to exert all their energies in con- 
 junction it might, and I believe it would, be 
 otherwise. 
 
 Let us now look at home ; let us look at the 
 constitution ; but, first, would it not be wiser to 
 look for it ? Surely it is the interest of the present 
 ministry to abandon the old rotten system. They 
 are supported by the people, because they are
 
 THE PERCEVAL MINISTRY 41 
 
 thought more honest than their predecessors. 
 They are also more intelligent, more vigilant, more 
 active. How little is wanting to establish their 
 power ! The regent sees clearly that they alone 
 can serve him : how gladly would the nation 
 co-operate in confirming this favourable impression ! 
 No administration ever had such general support. 
 It needs not to disburse the wages of iniquity : 
 the crutch of a former premier may be the cross of 
 Mr. Perceval. People are ready to pay their last 
 farthing for the war against Napoleon ; but if they 
 see it granted in pensions and sinecures, they will 
 reserve their arms, at least, for a vengeance more 
 practicable and more deep. What the constitution 
 now is may be doubtful ; but every man pretends 
 he can tell you what is injustice, what is oppression, 
 what is peculation, what is defeat, what is indigence, 
 what are inquisitorial taxes, and discretionary 
 power. Many of these expressions would indeed 
 have puzzled his father, but education of late years 
 has been prodigiously improved. It requires a 
 longer and more profound study to read, mark, 
 learn, and inwardly digest, the voluminous folios of 
 our late assessments, under the assiduous tutorage 
 of the most acute tax-gatherer, than was required 
 not long ago to obtain all the degrees of an 
 university. 
 
 I do, from my heart, wish and desire the 
 permanence of the present ministry, but it is only 
 
 6
 
 42 PREFACE 
 
 by justice that it can be permanent. If the clue of 
 those measures which they are now pursuing in 
 Ireland were traced to its utmost extent, it would 
 lead us through a labyrinth of defilement so dark 
 and horrible that, even with broad daylight before 
 us, we should almost doubt the practicability of 
 escape. Of what consequence is it to us if the 
 Irish choose to worship a cow or a potatoe ? Is 
 there any danger that the purity of our religion 
 should be contaminated by it, or that the purity of 
 our parliament should be sullied by their admission ? 
 If all the members returned were Catholics, still 
 what harm could they do ? But the supposition is 
 quite gratuitous, for it is certain that many, and 
 probable that the greater part, would be protestants. 
 What we hear of their discontent and turbulence is 
 fundamentally true, but much exaggerated. Their 
 writers are not remarkable for sobriety of discus- 
 sion, and they consider the au^o-t? as the principal 
 embellishment of style. We may attribute some- 
 thing to bad humour, and something to bad taste. 
 A history of the present times should not be written 
 in that country. Where indeed should it ? This 
 is not the period, nor is this the world, where 
 genius can exist without passion and without 
 sympathy.
 
 COMMENTARY ON " MEMOIES 
 OF MR. FOX" 
 
 CHAPTER I 
 
 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 Fox and his time Corruption in Parliament Pitt and the peerage 
 George III. and dukedoms Fox's History of James II. Dryden's 
 prose and verse Heroic poetry Pope's invention Fox as a letter- 
 writer Place-hunters Three in a bed Coalition ministries 
 Fox's French proclivities Only right when Pitt wrong. 
 
 [" I KNEW Mr. Fox, however, at a period when 
 his glories began to brighten when a philosophical 
 and noble determination had, for a considerable 
 time, induced him to renounce the captivating 
 allurements and amusements of fashionable life 
 and when, resigning himself to rural pleasures, 
 domestic retirement, and literary pursuits, he 
 became a new man, or rather, more justly may 
 I say, he returned to the solid enjoyment of a 
 tranquil, yet refined, rural life, from which he 
 had been awhile withdrawn, but had never been 
 alienated." TROTTER'S Memoirs, preface, viii.] 
 
 Page viii. " At a period when his glories began 
 to brighten." It was rather late in life for the 
 glories of a politician to begin to brighten. 
 
 Page ix. " It must be granted, too, that a 
 commercial and luxurious nation, however great,
 
 44 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 is less favourable to the production of so extra- 
 ordinary a character as that of Mr. Fox, than one 
 in which simplicity and disinterestedness would be 
 the prevailing features." 1 
 
 Mr. Fox bore about him, until he advanced in 
 years, all the characteristics of an age the most 
 corrupt and profligate. One of simplicity and 
 disinterestedness is not perhaps that in which a 
 truly great man shines most conspicuously. Cato 
 and Brutus, who were more disinterested characters, 
 though not greater than Caesar, lived in an age of 
 impurity and corruption. 2 Hampden, Hutchinson, 
 Ludlow, Algernon Sydney, Milton, lived in the 
 most disgraceful days of England. They are, like 
 the lightning of heaven, more visible and awful 
 through the surrounding darkness. In the times 
 of the Curii and Camilli, Mr. Fox would have been 
 a prodigy of abomination. In those of Charles II. he 
 would have appeared one of the brightest and best 
 courtiers. He came forward into life with every 
 advantage, and the age was neither too light nor 
 too dark a background for the clear and steady 
 exhibition of his features. He found no fault in 
 
 1 Trotter adds : " The powerful weight of mercantile interests in 
 the councils of the English people, is decidedly adverse to the 
 germination, expansion, and glory of genius." 
 
 2 Landor, in the Pentameron, makes Petrarca say : " We are 
 reluctant to admit that the most wretched days of ancient Rome 
 were the days of her most illustrious men ; that they began amid the 
 triumphs of Scipio, when the Gracchi perished, and reached the worst 
 under the dictatorship of Csesar, when perished Liberty herself." 
 Works, iii. 494,
 
 THE ENGLISH NOBILITY 45 
 
 the luxuries of this nation, and was deeply imbued 
 with that portion of its commercial spirit which 
 exacts no industry, and pays no tax the 
 aristocratical commerce of the gaming-table. 
 
 Page xi. " [Demosthenes had the great advant- 
 age of speaking to a large and independent popular 
 assembly.] Fox spoke to an assembly of too 
 aristocratic, as well as commercial, a cast," etc. l 
 
 The qualities are opposite. Both could not pre- 
 ponderate. In fact, there was very little of what 
 suits our notions of aristocracy. Brothers and sons 
 of noblemen were in the House of Commons, but 
 these had no aristocratical views or opinions. They 
 sat and rose only for places and for pensions : their 
 very seats were commercial. It is only an ex- 
 tremely small part of the English nobility itself 
 that can be called the aristocracy. Pitt, who 
 despised, or perhaps hated it, made it a complete 
 miscellany of fugitive pieces. 2 Whoever chose to 
 
 1 "To expect/' Trotter adds, "the same effects from his eloquence." 
 
 2 Elsewhere Landor says of W. Pitt: "Jealous of power and distrustful 
 of the people that raised him to it, he enriches and attaches to him the 
 commercial part of the nation by the most wasteful prodigality both 
 in finance and war, and he loosens from the landed the chief proprietors 
 by raising them to the peerage " Works, iv. 266. See also the con- 
 versation between Pitt and Canning, where Pitt is made to say : " I hate 
 and always hated these [the ancient aristocracy]. I do not mean the 
 rich : they served me. I mean the old houses : they overshadowed 
 me" Works, iii. 187. Sheridan, in the House of Commons, about 
 April, 1792, said: " Sixty or seventy peerages had been created under 
 the present administration [Pitt's] for no distinguished abilities, for no 
 public services, but merely for their interest in returning members to 
 Parliament."
 
 46 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 desert the cause of the people in the lower house, 
 was cut out for the upper. He treated the lords 
 as Julius Csesar treated the senate at Rome. 1 At 
 last the King thought proper to keep a sort of side- 
 chapel for a sanctuary, and separated the ducal 
 dignity from the rest. 2 In honour and considera- 
 tion it was no longer a house of peers. The 
 people, in turning the new ones into ridicule, lost 
 by degrees a part of their respect for the more 
 ancient ; and the French revolution found nothing 
 but their reason, a feeble barrier among the vulgar, 
 to oppose. All their salutary prejudices were rooted 
 out ; the more acrimonious were left. 
 
 Page xii. " [Although he (Fox) distinctly saw 
 the ruin preparing by a rash and obstinate minister 
 (Pitt), for his country,] no expression of bitter- 
 ness ever escaped his lips. The name of that 
 minister," etc. 3 
 
 No more than against his opponents at cards. 
 If he lost to-night, he might win to-morrow. 
 
 Page xiv. [" Lord Holland, in his preface to 
 Mr. Fox's Historical Fragment, 4 has dwelt too 
 
 1 "Caesar with a senate at his heels." POPE, Essay on Man, iv. 258. 
 
 3 In November, 1789, Pitt asked for a dukedom for the Marquis of 
 Buckingham. " The King, however, refused. He had no objection 
 to create marquises and earls, but he had determined to reserve the 
 rank of duke for the royal family." STANHOPE'S Pitt, ii. 41. 
 
 3 ' ' The name," Trotter says, " of that minister (William Pitt), was 
 rarely, if at all, noticed by him, and never with acrimony." 
 
 4 A History of the Early Part of the Reign of James the Second, by the 
 Right Hon. Charles James Fox, London, 1808. Lord Holland, who
 
 FOX AS AN AUTHOR 47 
 
 much upon his uncle's solicitude as to historical 
 composition. Mr. Fox doubtless felt anxious to 
 keep it distinct, as he ought, from oratorical de- 
 livery ; but I am inclined to think that historic 
 matter flowed from him as his despatches did, 
 with facility and promptness. His manuscript of 
 the Fragment, of which a good part is in his 
 own handwriting, has but very few corrections or 
 alterations ; and his great anxiety (and very justly) 
 appears to me to have regarded facts, rather than 
 style."] 
 
 "Historical Fragment, etc." What shall we 
 think of a man's judgment, who, in writing a 
 history, had resolved to employ no other words 
 than a poet had employed in his verses, prefaces, 
 and dedications? Dryden, 1 of whom I speak, has 
 written on hardly any subject but poetry, and only 
 a part of his writings was known to Mr. Fox : the 
 rest has been published since, and is of little value. 
 Of his poems, a part seems to have been composed 
 in a brothel, the remainder in a gin-shop. His 
 prose is vigorous and natural. Those who call him 
 a copious writer would never have called him so 
 had he not been a careless one. In fact, he uses 
 any word that comes first. He had engaged with 
 
 edited the volume, says of his uncle : " Though he frequently com- 
 mended both Hume and Blackstone's style, and always spoke of 
 Middleton's with admiration, he assured me that he would admit 
 no word into his book for which he had not the authority of Dryden." 
 Preface, xl. 
 
 1 Of Drydeu, Landor says, elsewhere : "Alexander's Feast smells of 
 gin at second hand, with true Briton fiddlers full of native talent in the 
 orchestra." Works, iv. 602.
 
 48 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 a bookseller to furnish so much j 1 and he made no 
 effort but to guard against 
 
 Immitis rupta tyranni 
 Fcedera. 2 
 
 He is never affected : he had not time for dress. 
 There is no obscurity, no redundancy ; but in every 
 composition, in poetry or prose, a strength and 
 spirit purely English, neither broken by labour 
 nor by refinement. Still, he is not what Mr. Fox and 
 others have called him, a great poet : for there is not 
 throughout his works one stroke of the sublime or 
 one touch of the pathetic, which are the only true 
 and adequate criteria; nor is there that just de- 
 scription of manners in his dramas, which is very 
 important, though secondary. For these reasons, 
 he will never be considered by good judges as equal 
 to Otway, to Chatterton, to Burns, or even to 
 Cowper. He was at repose, and free from all those 
 trifling and pretty inventions which many have 
 considered as indications and proofs of the truly 
 poetical mind. There is a species of these which 
 imposes alike on the undisciplined and scholastic. 
 I mean the invention, or rather, the modification 
 of machinery. People of an ordinary cast in the 
 republic of letters grow no less weary at hearing of 
 just taste, than the vulgar in Athens were at hear- 
 
 1 Dryden's connection with Jacob Tonson lasted from 1769 till his 
 death. Coleridge talked of ' ' Dryden's slovenly verses written for the 
 trade." H. C. ROBINSON'S Diary, ii. 58. 
 
 * Virgil, Georgics, iv. 492.
 
 POPE AND DRYDEN 49 
 
 ing of Aristides the just. When our heroic verse 
 was perfected, as it was by Dryden, and others had 
 employed it with success, something new was 
 demanded. Poems then began to contain as much 
 imagery as toy-shops do, and about as valuable. 
 The Rape of the Lock was admired, not for its 
 easy and light touches of humour, but for what was 
 called the invention of Pope, his application of the 
 machinery. It was not perceived nor suspected, 
 that there is more real invention in the Epistle oj 
 Eloise to Abelard., although so much is copied 
 from the original. Warton 1 was unable to trace 
 it in the discovery, the arrangement, the concentra- 
 tion of what is scattered by passion, in the poet's fine 
 tact developing that idiosyncrasy which is peculiar 
 to one person in one situation, and his power of 
 enforcing those appeals which reach in a moment 
 every heart alike. There was nothing of this in 
 Dryden, nor is there anything which could be very 
 useful to Mr. Fox. He certainly left behind him 
 no treasury of expressions which contained anything 
 convertible to the purposes of an historian. 
 
 1 Speaking of The Rape of the Lock, Dr. Joseph Warton says : " The 
 insertion of the machinery of the sylphs in proper places, without the 
 least appearance of its being awkwardly stitched in, is one of the 
 happiest effects of judgment and art." Essay on the Genius and 
 Writings of Pope, 3rd ed., p. 225. As every one knows, Addison 
 had discouraged Pope from inserting the machinery (Ib. p. 160). 
 
 When he comes to the Eloise and Abelard, Warton says : ' ' Pope was 
 a most excellent improver, if no great original inventor. . . . How 
 finely he has worked up the hints of distress that are scattered up and 
 down in Abelard's and Eloisa's Letters, and in a little French history 
 of their lives and misfortunes." Essay on Pope, p. 309. 
 
 7
 
 50 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 Page xv. [" His (Fox's) letters are perfect in 
 their kind, more agreeable as they have nothing 
 of his egotism than those of Cicero, and more 
 solid than those of Madame de Sevigne'. Those 
 which I have been able to present to the reader are 
 models of English composition, as well as valuable 
 depositories of the critical opinions of Mr. . Fox 
 upon the most excellent authors of ancient and 
 modern times."] 
 
 " His letters, etc." Compare them with Cicero's ! 
 What ! are we as much interested by the occur- 
 rences and opinions in these, nearly all of which 
 are intrinsically of small moment, as by the 
 events which agitate the soul of Cicero in the 
 most important era of the Roman common- 
 wealth ? Even if Mr. Fox had said anything 
 about the great characters of the day, could 
 we be as much interested, however personally 
 and painfully we have felt from them, about 
 the actions of a Pulteney and a Whitelocke, as 
 we are by those of Csesar and Cato, of Antony 
 and Brutus ? The style is unimportant in both. 
 Who would pick out a solecism from the con- 
 flagration of a city, or listen to an harmonious 
 sentence in the very downfall of a republic ? 
 The history of Mr. Fox was written with no 
 carelessness, most certainly, but with incorrect- 
 ness, and, I think, with weakness. His reasonings 
 are ill-expressed and disorderly ; his deductions 
 inconsequent, his expressions neither clear nor
 
 A PATRIOT'S GRIEF 51 
 
 compact. Cumberland, 1 with a shrewdness of 
 criticism which he never showed before, pointed 
 out these defects in his review. 
 
 Pages xv.-xvii. " [His Historical Fragment was 
 written under the disadvantage of his frame 
 of mind being somewhat affected by a tinge of 
 melancholy. . . . Public affairs were so manifestly 
 tending to a crisis when he wrote, and the 
 minister had so much weakened and impaired the 
 constitution, that Mr. Fox could not but grieve 
 for his feelings were warm, and his mind of a 
 truly patriotic cast. ... In having recourse to 
 history, still continuing his exertions in favour 
 of liberty, he showed the generous struggles of 
 a noble mind to serve his country and posterity 
 in the only way left open to him ; and if a shade 
 of melancholy pervades it, the source from which 
 it certainly sprung (for he was easy in circum- 
 stances, and truly happy in domestic life) is the 
 most honourable and venerable sentiment which 
 can exist in the human breast] grief for a 
 wronged and unhappily misguided country." 
 
 As if a country could be happily misguided ! 
 In the Dii me maK perdant, pejus perdant, etc., 
 of the Romans, there was an idiomatic intensity : 
 and the Greeks had a similar expression of their 
 feelings. We in these countries have nothing 
 like it, except among the secretary's countrymen 
 killed dead. Grief for a wronged country ! And 
 
 1 The first number (February 1, 1809), of The London Review, which 
 Richard Cumberland edited, contains an article by him on Mr. Fox's 
 Reign of James II.
 
 52 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 yet this grieving patriot outraged the whole con- 
 tinent of South America ; a whole people, whose 
 arms and hearts were open to us, by refusing 
 them the appointment, the maintenance, the 
 security, nay, by heaven, the mere impunity of 
 their own civil officers, treating them worse than 
 the most atrocious enemies had been ever treated, 
 worse than any conquered colony of the demo- 
 cratic French, under the rancorous and vindictive 
 Pitt : sending tax-gatherers of all descriptions 
 into their country, and filling up every place 
 and appointment by creatures of his own, ruined 
 and desperate gamblers, whose rapine, if it drove 
 them into revolt, would at least have broken the 
 sinews of retaliating war. 
 
 [Pages xviii.-xix. " His return to politics . . . 
 suspended his History. The words of the noble 
 editor of the Fragment are very remarkable, 
 as to Mr. Fox foregoing his original intention 
 of retiring for a time from public life. 'The 
 remonstrances, however, of those friends, for 
 whose judgment he had the greatest deference, 
 ultimately prevailed.' Here is proof, from the 
 authority of Lord Holland, how reluctant Mr. 
 Fox was to abandon his intention. I know that 
 the basis of his determination was a solid and 
 grand one ; that occasionally at his breakfast- 
 table we had a little discussion on this point ; 
 and that Mrs. Fox and myself uniformly joined 
 in recommending retirement until the people felt 
 properly upon public affairs. I am sorry to be
 
 POLITICAL STAGE TRICKS 53 
 
 compelled to say, that the friends who ' ultimately 
 prevailed ' calculated very ill upon political 
 matters, and did not sufficiently estimate the 
 towering and grand character of Mr. Fox."] 
 
 Page xix. " Until the people felt properly 
 upon public affairs." He should have lived, then, 
 until now. As far as he and his competitors are 
 concerned, the people never felt more correctly. 
 No more of staring dupery to chattering impostors, 
 mounting the same stage and exhibiting the same 
 tricks, after hooting them off, successively. If the 
 people feels less for freedom than it used to do, 
 it also feels less for faction. It has lost most of 
 its money, but it has recovered a part of its wits. 
 We must allow it a little time to get the better 
 of its shame, and it will be the same manly people 
 it was before. 
 
 Page xix. " The towering and manly char- 
 acter, etc." 1 
 
 What ! of a fellow who replied to one asking 
 a place of him, " We lie three in a bed already : " 2 
 who was instrumental in bringing an act before 
 Parliament, and in procuring it to be passed, to 
 
 the eternal shame and infamy of , which 
 
 should enable Lord Grenville to be the auditor 
 
 1 See last extract. Trotter wrote " towering and grand character." 
 1 The Courier of March 15, 1806, said, in a leading article : " To 
 use a pleasant but homely phrase of the new ministerialists, they now 
 lie three in a bed. The Foxite, and the Sidmouthite, and the 
 Grenvilleite now pig together, head and front, in the same truckle 
 bed"
 
 54 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 of his own accounts ! who had the impudence 
 to say that Hanover should be as dear to English- 
 men as Hampshire. 1 Could an Englishman say 
 this ? Could it be uttered in the English 
 language ? Could it be inculcated, could it be 
 proposed, could it be suggested, to the English 
 people ? Louis, and James, and Barillon, were 
 in their graves. What man succeeded them ? 
 what man revived their projects ? Charles James 
 Fox ; the historian of their transactions, who had 
 just detected and exposed and reprobated their 
 crimes. Shame and contempt on those, who, 
 knowing these facts, profess themselves of his 
 party and call themselves after his name. To 
 what extremities will not faction urge them ! 
 What practical lies will they not commit ! He 
 trod under foot every compact with his con- 
 stituents, every promise, every oath, solemnly 
 made before the people. The people was his 
 sovereign, but was Hanover their patrimony, or 
 their country ? He never came into office but 
 through a breach of honour, never without a 
 close and intimate coalition with men whom he 
 had frequently, and loudly, and justly, denounced 
 as worthy of the gallows. So atrocious is his 
 guilt, he never joined them but at the very 
 moment when their criminality was at the highest ; 
 and when, without his coalescence, the people 
 
 1 See note l on page 16.
 
 AN ASSURED REPUTATION 55 
 
 would have dragged them to punishment or aban- 
 doned them to disgrace. 
 
 Page xxii. "Are the present race to go to 
 the grave without further knowledge of Mr. Fox 
 [than that conveyed in the Preface to the 
 Fragment] ? " l 
 
 He will not be quite so fortunate. 
 Fama loquetur amis. 2 
 
 He may surely expect a few quartos from the 
 pacific pen of Mr. Roscoe. 3 
 
 Et vituld tu dignus, et hie. 4 
 
 Page xxv. [" In early youth, I understand, 
 Mr. Fox was distinguished by extraordinary appli- 
 cation to study. He was abroad for a short 
 time at the early age of fourteen, to which may 
 be attributed, probably, that fluency, perfect 
 understanding, and good pronunciation of French, 
 which most eminently marked him, amongst his 
 countrymen, and even Frenchmen, at Paris. His 
 knowledge of Italian was nearly as great, and 
 probably to be attributed to the same cause. If 
 I were to sketch the divisions of his life, I would 
 form them into : His youth, warm and impetu- 
 ous, but full of extraordinary promise. His 
 middle age, energetic and patriotic. His latter 
 
 1 Trotter is alluding to Lord Holland's preface to Fox's Reign of 
 James II, 
 
 1 Catullus, Ixxviii., 10. 
 
 3 William Roscoe (1753-1831) had already published his lives of 
 Lorenzo de' Medici and Leo X. 
 
 4 Virgil, Eclog. iii. 109.
 
 56 A GEORGIAN STATESMAN 
 
 days, commencing from the French revolution, 
 simple, grand, and sublime."] 
 
 " His youth, warm and impetuous. His middle 
 age, etc." His youth was very well known to have 
 exceeded in every kind of profligacy the youth 
 of any Englishman his contemporary. To the 
 principles of a Frenchman he added the habits 
 of a Malay, 1 in idleness, drunkenness, and gaming. 
 In middle life he was precisely the opposite of 
 whoever was in power until he could spring 
 forward to the same station. Whenever Mr. Pitt 
 was wrong, Mr. Fox was right, and then only. His 
 morals, his taste, his literature, all were French ; 2 
 he grew rather wiser afterwards. His principles 
 were arbitrary when the government of France 
 was so. He approved of every change there, 
 whether of men or measures. The constituent 
 assembly, the convention, Brissot, Robespierre, 
 Tallien, Barras, Bonaparte, all these in succession 
 were the objects of his admiration. His sagacity 
 could find out something to palliate every crime 
 they committed. All were proposed to us as 
 worthy of our confidence : we could make peace 
 and treaties with all of them, we could do every- 
 thing with them but fight. 
 
 1 "Gaming, with the Malays, is a substitute for betel." LANDOR, 
 Works, iil 109. 
 
 2 " Mrs. Crewe told me," Samuel Rogers said, "that on some occa- 
 sion, when it was remarked that Fox still retained his early love for 
 France and everything French, Burke said : ' Yes ; he is like a cat he 
 is fond of the house, though the family be gone.' " Table Talk, p. 81.
 
 CHAPTER II 
 
 WAR AND POLICY 
 
 Fox, the King, and the nation Easy temper and lax principles 
 Pitt's lost opportunity Traitorous Correspondence Bill Pitt's 
 passion Duel with Tierney Eloquence not statesmanship The 
 war with France Lord Hawkesbury's project Valenciennes and 
 Dantzig Expedition to the Dardanelles Slave trade A dis- 
 jointed ministry Posterity's judgment. 
 
 [Page 2. "The vulgar, whose prejudices it is 
 difficult to efface, and who are more prone to 
 depreciate than to make allowances for great 
 characters, have long imagined, and even still 
 continue to think, that Mr. Fox was a mere 
 dissipated man of pleasure. This idea had been 
 industriously cherished and propagated by a party, 
 whose interested views were promoted by keeping 
 from the councils of the nation a man so eminently 
 their superior. The unprincipled desires of selfish 
 ambition had kept him out of stations for which 
 nature had so eminently qualified him. Destined, 
 as he appeared, of becoming the founder of a 
 political school in England capable of raising 
 her in the opinion of other nations, it was his 
 ill fate to be] opposed by a minister incapable of 
 appreciating his merit, and unwilling to recommend 
 it to the approbation of his sovereign, though him- 
 self unfit to be premier, and indeed inadequate to fill 
 any considerable department of the state." 
 
 8
 
 58 WAR AND POLICY 
 
 I believe it is not usual with ministers to recom- 
 mend, very pressingly, their opponents to royal 
 favour. 1 The King and nation judged for them- 
 selves. They had seen as much of Mr. Fox as 
 Mr. Pitt had seen : they had tried him, and 
 he was found unfit for his situation : they tried 
 him again, and he was more unfit. The same 
 tergiversation, the same profligacy, the same 
 unsteadiness, the same inclining and yielding, 
 which never would let him be upright, the same 
 incapacity of apportioning means to ends, and 
 the same inability to retain that popular favour 
 which hardly ever totally deserts the statesman 
 of easy temper and lax principles. Nothing but 
 the most open and utter contempt of all fair 
 dealing with them would make the people fall 
 off from a man after their own image, in favour 
 of one, unbending, contemptuous, and scornful, 
 and only accessible to be repulsive. No two 
 men ever so grossly mismanaged public affairs. 
 Whatever was the government of France since 
 the revolution, even under the most rash and 
 inexperienced of its rulers, and amidst difficulties 
 in which the most experienced of them would 
 have been perplexed, the government of France 
 had always the advantage of ours, always excelled 
 it in intelligence and in promptitude. When 
 
 1 In 1804, Pitt urged the claims of Fox, but George III. refused 
 to have anything to do either with him or Grenville. LORD ROSEBEHY'S 
 Pitt, 241.
 
 THE FRENCH DIRECTORATE 59 
 
 the members of the directory proved themselves 
 accessible to bribery, 1 the richest nation in Europe 
 such then was England formed no such attempt 
 or hope. They had foiled Mr. Pitt ; he saw only 
 the men ; he was bold and sincere enough to 
 tell them again and again how he hated them, 
 and that such an enemy of corruption would not 
 gratify their cupidity. He might have obtained 
 all the ostensible objects of the war for less money 
 than he expended in any fortnight of it. They 
 could not, indeed, with safety have abandoned one 
 village of France, yet they could have evacuated 
 all Holland ; and their people, weary of war and 
 taxes, and cooling from their revolutionary frenzy, 
 would have applauded a peace (durable because 
 equal) founded on this basis. But they had thrown 
 him on the ground, and beaten him soundly, and 
 he kicked without an object to kick at. When he 
 rose again, he attacked with equal vehemence those 
 who looked on without sympathy, and employed 
 his Attorney-General to involve them in some 
 sufferings of their own. 2 
 
 1 " No sooner had Lord Malmesbury left Lille (Sept. 18, 1797), than 
 Mr. Pitt received a secret overture, on the part of Barras, offering 
 peace on his own terms, if only an enormous sum no less than 
 2,000,000 sterling could be provided for Barras and his friends." 
 STANHOPE'S Pitt, iii. 61. In his Letters to Lord Liverpool (p. 56), 
 Laudor says : ' ' There was indeed a time when the directory was 
 accessible to bribery, as was proved in the notorious case of the 
 American Commissioners." Marshall, Pinckney, and Gerry were 
 offered a bribe for their mediation. 
 
 1 The Traitorous Correspondence Bill was introduced by Sir John 
 Scott, Attorney-General, on March 15, 1793.
 
 60 WAR AND POLICY 
 
 Hurried by passion, he seldom had an aim, and 
 always missed it. Obstinate and perverse, but more 
 changeable than is usual with the opinionative, 
 neither his modes of attack, nor his motives for it, 
 were fixed. His warfare was more like the rapid 
 struggles and scratches of some timorous animal 
 just caught than the deliberate and manly blows 
 that aim at the vitals of an enemy. He retracted 
 no insult, he renounced no error. The son of 
 a chivalrous father, whose personal and private 
 view of honour was serene and clear, whose sense 
 of political and official duties was, and was only in 
 a moderate degree, subordinate to his sense of the 
 religious ; this very son, whose preceptor was a 
 bishop, 1 this our defender against atheism, who had 
 enacted and enforced so many fasts, and supplica- 
 tions, and forms of prayer, went forth on a Sunday 
 morning, with a pistol in his hand, to meet an 
 importunate accountant 2 who had questioned him 
 hi the House. How happens it that inconsistency 
 is so frequently, so almost perpetually, the attendant 
 of eloquence ? Is fickleness but one remove from 
 facility ? or is the cause to be found in that self- 
 deception which comes from deceiving others, 
 and which, while every thing moves with it, is 
 unconscious that it moves ? 
 
 Mr. Pitt was eloquent, so was Mr. Fox : so were 
 
 1 The Rev. George Tomline, afterwards Pretyman, Bishop of Lincoln, 
 1757, was the younger Pitt's tutor at Cambridge. 
 * Pitt fought his duel with George Tierney on May 27, 1798.
 
 GOVERNMENT BY ORATORY 61 
 
 Anytus and Melitus, 1 and all the demagogues 
 whose vociferations have preceded the downfall of 
 a state. In England it is for eloquence alone that 
 men are chosen to fill the offices of government. 
 If they can speak three hours together, it is thought, 
 with reason, that they can do great things. Never- 
 theless it has been the opinion of some that there 
 is a latent flaw and unsoundness in this reasoning, 
 and that its application ought not to be universal 
 or unreserved. They have suspected it hence has 
 happened that, with such resources as no nation 
 ever possessed, we have done so extremely little 
 against an enemy who, according to the minister 
 himself, had no resources at all. We have given 
 this enemy both pleas and power enough to regulate 
 every court in Europe, to drill every king, and to 
 tear the epaulet from every emperor. There was 
 a time when twenty thousand Englishmen might 
 have marched to Paris ; not in the way imagined by 
 such people as Lord Hawkesbury and Mr. Canning, 2 
 
 1 The accusers of Socrates. 
 
 2 Compare this with Burke : " Had we carried on the war on the side 
 of France which looks towards the Channel or the Atlantic, we should 
 have attacked our enemy on his weak and unarmed side." Second Letter 
 on a Regicide Peace, p. 98. 
 
 As for the plan of a rapid advance into the heart of France, urged in 
 1793, Lord Stanhope says : ' ' When Mr. Jenkinson [afterwards Lord 
 Hawkesbury] ventured in the House of Commons to declare his approval 
 of it, the idea was received with derision. Long afterwards . . . the 
 words ' Lord Hawkesbury's march to Paris ' were the burden of many 
 a jest or satirical song against him." Life of Pitt, ii. 204. 
 
 Fox, in his letter to the electors of Westminster, 1793, alluding to 
 Mr. Jenkinson's project, exclaims: "The conquest of France! O 
 calumniated crusaders, how rational and moderated were your projects !
 
 62 WAR AND POLICY 
 
 along a pleasant paved road shaded with elms and 
 apple-trees, through Calais and Amiens, where the 
 people once were English, and are still vastly our 
 friends, but as allies to fifty thousand Royalists in 
 La Vende'e, led by a Condd But Valenciennes 
 was taken in the name of the emperor of Germany ; 
 there was such an emperor then, and the people 
 of France saw clearly that the sword which we 
 carried under the pretext of loyalty was drawn 
 solely for ambition. There was a time when the 
 same twenty thousand would have turned the 
 balance in favour of Austria ; but they were 
 scattered all over the world, as if Napoleon had 
 ordered them into such cantonments. Russia had 
 beaten the French. If we had relieved Dantzig 1 
 their left wing would not merely have been turned, 
 but cut off; it was without support. There was 
 also a time when the force I have mentioned would 
 have formed a nucleus for the armies of Prussia, 
 Sweden, Hesse, Hanover. Exasperated by the 
 recent cruelties of the enemy, they would no longer 
 have fought for one government or another : they 
 would have fought for themselves, and fought well. 
 Lastly, there was a time too if in such circum- 
 stances it is worth remembering when the wretched 
 
 O ! much-injured Louis XIV., upon what slight grounds have you been 
 accused of restless and inordinate ambition ! O ! tame and feeble 
 Cervantes, with what a timid pencil and faint colours have you painted 
 the portrait of a disordered imagination ! 
 
 1 Dantzig surrendered to Bonaparte May 27, 1807.
 
 A DEMAGOGUE'S BLUNDERS 63 
 
 natives of Egypt 1 might have been emancipated. 
 But the country could not be secured, long 
 together, by three or four thousand men ; Mr. Fox 
 must be weaker than a babe or drowsier than 
 a kitten to suppose it. The attempt to awe 
 Constantinople 2 was worse than Pittite, a city 
 where there are more stout fighting men, men of 
 lives and habits altogether military, than in any 
 other throughout the world. I have spoken already 
 of Buenos Ayres. So many instances of miserable 
 folly have never occurred within so short a period, 
 I will not say in England, I will not say in modern 
 Europe ; I will say under the most stupid, the 
 most slothful, the most brutalised of Roman, or 
 Byzantine, or Asiatic emperors. Xerxes and 
 Darius could afford a good many ; ours would 
 have exhausted them. Collect and place before 
 your eyes all the errors of these poor creatures, and 
 you cannot, I repeat it, bring together such a mass 
 within so small a compass. You may trace within 
 the short administration of one demagogue all that 
 
 1 In March , 1807, five thousand men under General Mackenzie Frazer 
 were sent to Alexandria, which capitulated ; but the further operations 
 failed. 
 
 8 In February, 1807, a force under Sir Thomas Duckworth was sent 
 to the Dardanelles to favour the views of Russia and to counteract 
 French ascendency at Constantinople. Writing on June 5, 1807, 
 Mr. F. Jackson said : ' ' The loss of our troops in Egypt has been very 
 great, and is attributed to the ill-advised plans of the late Cabinet, and 
 to the still worse-conducted execution of them by the generals. Never 
 have our arms been so disgraced as in that affair, and in the business 
 of the Dardanelles." Diaries, etc., of Sir George Jackson, ii. 123. But 
 Fox, who died on Sept. 13, 1806, could not be blamed.
 
 64 WAR AND POLICY 
 
 corrupts the air and poisons the springs of freedom, 
 while, with illusive zeal to unrivet the fetter, he 
 hammered the chain of slavery red-hot. Hope 
 long deferred maketh the heart sick. 1 How many, 
 who relied on his promises, were made very able 
 critics of such sentences ! The abolition of the 
 trade in negroes we had influence enough in 
 Europe to have effected, and we did not. 2 The act 
 was ill digested ; the prohibitions evasory and 
 incomplete. Mr. Fox might have appealed to 
 Bonaparte, and his love of glory, to abolish it on 
 the continent. It would have cost him nothing 
 but a decree. He would have been proud of having 
 been consulted. Even a petition here would not 
 have been an act of baseness ; the less so, the 
 greater the petitioner. To sound him an expres- 
 sion, I am afraid, not applicable to our politicians 
 in reference to him was not the right method. 
 If we wished the thing done effectually, and not 
 merely the credit of promoting it, we should have 
 addressed his minister in somewhat of this language : 
 " War, then, between our nations must continue. 
 There are many concessions which we believed that 
 our power and our moderation might demand. 
 But if both countries, unhappily, are still subject to 
 
 1 Proverbs, xiii. 12. 
 
 2 On June 10, 1806, Fox moved a resolution for the abolition of 
 the slave trade. After forty years, he said, of political life, he could 
 retire with contentment if he carried his resolution. The Royal assent 
 to the Bill abolishing the trade was given on March 25, 1806.
 
 PITT AND THE SLAVE TRADE 65 
 
 irritations and jealousies, which will cease only 
 under the infliction of greater sufferings, let 
 us atone to humanity in the best way we can, 
 making the readiest and least costly sacrifices. 
 The English are almost the only gainers by a most 
 nefarious and unnatural traffic ; others, however, 
 share in its patronage and its disgrace. We desire 
 its abolition. Let the Emperor say whether France 
 or England shall redeem her honour first ; which 
 shall first employ all her influence and power in 
 demanding and enforcing the abolition of the 
 African slave-trade through the world." 
 
 I think Napoleon would have claimed it as one 
 of the conceptions of his mighty genius. It is 
 among the few things which I would entrust to 
 his generosity, knowing that I could lose nothing, 
 and might gain much. When a writer in a state- 
 paper speaks of the wants or desires of humanity, 
 it is considered as merely a piece of cant to lull 
 his countrymen asleep, should his adversary be 
 very bloody-minded ; that is, if he applies them 
 to his own country, to the enemy's, or to any 
 hypothetical or imaginary one. Let him appeal 
 and plead in favour of some weak and abject 
 race, not subject to either of the belligerents, 
 not liable to become so, and what was common- 
 place in the last leaf, comes in this with all the 
 cogency, and more than all, of argument. It 
 raises a becoming shame and generous desire, by 
 
 9
 
 66 WAR AND POLICY 
 
 the native graces and novel beauty of disinterested- 
 ness. Perhaps I have spoken too much on the 
 omissions of a negligent, disjointed ministry, and, 
 some will think, too vehemently against the 
 leader. It is true that almost every possible 
 case of mismanagement has been stated. The 
 facts exist. This is my answer. Those who 
 cannot see them, those who overlook them in 
 the public records, are not likely to discover what 
 we lost of prosperity by their inattention, or of 
 glory by their inactivity. We have equally to 
 regret that they failed in every thing abroad, and 
 did not fail in almost every thing at home. If any 
 man will come forward and prove even this to 
 be exaggerated, and surely nothing worse can be 
 uttered or imagined of a ministry statesmen 
 would be an absurd expression I will then 
 acknowledge myself a very violent and very base 
 calumniator, an implacable enemy of my native 
 land, and what pensioners and reversionists think 
 infinitely more discreditable a man without a 
 stake in it. If I could argue with indifference, 
 with coolness, or with patience, of people who 
 have thrown down their principles in their hurry 
 to reach the cabinet and who have brought such 
 ignominy on the country, to say nothing of 
 distress and danger, I should then indeed be a 
 character most truly despicable. 
 
 I survey Mr. Fox and Mr. Pitt as others will
 
 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE VIRTUE 67 
 
 survey them a century hence, and as, according to 
 my humble views, they appear to higher powers 
 and purer intelligences. I would estimate all men 
 by their wisdom and their virtue. In high stations 
 these indeed are the most assailed and shaken ; 
 but they also have the advantage of showing their 
 forms more distinctly, and striking their roots 
 more deep. Nearly all men have, one time or 
 other, been placed in as trying situations as either 
 of these ministers. The emergencies of private 
 life require as much circumspection and discern- 
 ment as those of public. Persons are placed all 
 around a prime minister ; some bring intelligence, 
 some forward despatches, many are ready to assist 
 him with their counsel, and participate in any 
 obloquy his determinations may incur. Precepts 
 and precedents lie everywhere round about him ; 
 if he errs in following them he is pardoned, because 
 he did follow them, and praised because he was 
 soundly constitutional ; if he rejects or never 
 reads them, the scruples of a king or the divisions 
 of a cabinet absolve him. Difficulties of a private 
 kind hamper men by their closeness and con- 
 tinuity. On the worst occasions they can hardly 
 ask advice, on the lighter they neglect it. Hence 
 it has happened that men of great attainments, 
 philosophers and statesmen too, have acted in 
 domestic affairs inconsistently with their wisdom, 
 their glory, and their happiness. Life appears, in
 
 68 WAR AND POLICY 
 
 these instances, like a game at billiards. Those 
 who were surrounded by spectators and admirers, 
 at a larger table, and with a profusion of light 
 falling on it from above, strike, in a private and 
 less brilliant room, a lesser ball erroneously. Let 
 us remember, too for the recollection will be 
 useful when the allusion is forgotten that he who 
 silenced batteries and navies, and scattered them 
 to be the sport of all the elements, was baffled by 
 the fish nets of Boulogne. 1 When I come, as I 
 intend presently, to make a comparison, not 
 between the two English ministers, but between 
 one of them and Washington, I shall show that 
 difficulties may be, and have been overcome, far 
 more complicated and discouraging than either of 
 these encountered. The present men have com- 
 mitted fewer faults ; they act with more firmness, 
 and inspire more confidence. They also have their 
 errors. They ought never to have interfered in 
 the affairs of South America. There is a risk, 
 almost a certainty, of alienating from us not only 
 that country, but Spain. Both will be dissatisfied. 
 Urged by either party, we should have firmly and 
 peremptorily refused. Even that party itself 
 would place more confidence in us, and we should 
 have left a deep authentic impression of our dis- 
 interestedness and our integrity. 
 
 1 Referring either to Nelson's attack on the French flotilla at 
 Boulogne, August 15, 1801, or to Sir Sidney Smith's attack with 
 catamarans on Oct. 2, 1804.
 
 CHAPTER III 
 
 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 Chatham's eloquence His pension A minister in the witness-box 
 Pitt all account-book De mortuis The Sinking Fund Fox in 
 retirement As a man of letters Pascal National monuments 
 A Pantheon for Hyde Park Statues of great men Bacon and 
 Raleigh George Washington and William Pitt compared A con- 
 temptible Opposition George III. and the Army The American 
 Revolution A limited monarchy Forms of government A 
 Prime Minister in leading-strings Failure of coalitions The 
 Roman Triumvirate. 
 
 Page 3 of the Memoirs. ["Mr. Pitt, under the 
 controul of an extensive and liberal genius, like that 
 of Mr. Fox, might have been a useful minister of 
 finance ; but, in attempting to regulate the concerns 
 of the world, his vigour was creative of destruction, 
 and his imperious spirit, so unworthy a true 
 statesman, was prejudicial to liberty abroad and 
 dangerous to it at home. The financial dictator 
 of Downing Street was unfit to cope with the 
 consummate military and diplomatic characters that 
 had newly risen upon the Continent ; and it is 
 probable that even his father, Lord Chatham, a 
 man great through the weakness of France, would 
 have been foiled in such a contest ; certainly not 
 with so much disgrace, but, perhaps, with equal 
 injury to the country."] 
 
 " Lord Chatham, a man great through the 
 
 69
 
 70 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 weakness of France." Not entirely so. He was 
 rather great per se. His eloquence was more like 
 the eloquence of Demosthenes 1 than Mr. Fox's 
 was : one was invariably high, the other never 
 rose. Both were wrong ; but it is better that 
 admiration should flag from its continuance than 
 that it never should be excited. Demosthenes, 
 in the general tenor of his oratory, was warm, 
 equable, and sincere ; in the higher parts there was 
 a solemnity, a sanctitude, an enthusiastic, vivifying, 
 all-pervading spirit, by virtue of which every petty 
 passion lay inanimate and extinct. In the ampli- 
 tude of a soul so equable and so pure, he saw 
 no enemies but the enemies of his country. 
 Wherever they arose, his fire was directed to one 
 point, and nothing stood before it. Better is it 
 that such men as Augustulus, or Commodus, or 
 Louis XV. should be called Csesar than that 
 genius should submit to the same outrages as 
 truth, and Fox be called a Demosthenes. If 
 Lord Chatham more resembled him as an orator, 
 the resemblance ended here. In Demosthenes 
 was the pride of an inflexible republican ; in 
 Lord Chatham was the " pride that licks the 
 dust." 2 He accepted a pension from the enemy 
 
 1 Horace Walpole said that Chatham, in the speech he delivered on 
 November 13, 1755, surpassed Cicero and Demosthenes. Sir James 
 Mackintosh, writing in The Monthly Repository, September, 1807, 
 declared that Fox was "the most Demosthenean speaker since 
 Demosthenes." 
 
 3 Pope's Prologue to Satires, 333.
 
 LORD CHATHAM'S PENSION 71 
 
 he had reviled. One had been granted to his 
 sister by Lord Bute. 1 He wrote an angry letter 
 to her, and told her "he had hoped that the 
 names of Pitt and pension would never come 
 together." He received one himself, soon after, 
 from the same person ; and his own letter was 
 his sister's congratulation. The King had shewn 
 the same aversion to him as he uniformly shewed 
 to every man of genius : when the public accla- 
 mation forced him again into the council, he 
 approached the sovereign and courted his favour, 
 with a degree of reverential humility which it 
 would have been hardly less base to have felt 
 than to have feigned. Some courtiers, at a 
 distance, could not believe the evidence of their 
 senses. " Yes, yes, it is Pitt," said one behind ; 
 " I see his hook-nose between his knees." 2 
 
 The son was never guilty of a meanness such 
 
 1 When Mrs. Anne Pitt, sister of William Pitt the elder, received 
 a pension, he wrote to her that he grieved to see the name of Pitt in a 
 list of pensions. On October 6, 1761, the day after his resignation, 
 a pension of 3,000 a year was settled upon Pitt himself, for three 
 lives. His sister made a copy of his letter, and meant to send it to 
 him, but was restrained by friends. 
 
 Horace Walpole and Thomas Gray blamed Chatham for accepting 
 either peerage or pension. " What ! " said Walpole, cc to blast one's 
 character for the sake of a paltry annuity and a long-necked peerage !" 
 Chatham's biographer, F. Thackeray, writes : " How malignant or 
 obtuse must that mind be which cannot distinguish the case of Mr. 
 Pitt from that of the common herd of pensioners." Life of Chatham, 
 i. 593. 
 
 1 ' ' It is told of Chatham that when he met a bishop he bowed so low 
 that his nose could be seen between his knees. So appalling a suavity 
 of demeanour inspired probably even more terror than his indomitable 
 eye." LORD ROSEBKRY'S Pitt, p. 64.
 
 72 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 as this. His neck was unbent when his word was 
 broken and his honour cast away ; even when he 
 came into a court of justice l and swore he had 
 forgotten what he had sworn he never would 
 forget. Lord Chatham was all romance ; Mr. 
 William was all account-book. The above is, 
 however, too plain a proof that neither his memory 
 nor his ledger were to be trusted. 
 
 Page 4. " [I have, however, no desire in stig- 
 matising one of these personages (Pitt and Fox) 
 to elevate the other !] Both rest in the grave." 2 
 
 This is, of all reasons, the most weak and 
 wretched, why people should not be censured for 
 the evil they have done. It might indeed have 
 some force and validity if the evil and example 
 ceased totally with their lives. But even then 
 not much. If they are living, a writer tells you 
 
 1 For Pitt's evidence at the trial of Home Tooke, in 1794, see State 
 Trials, xxv. 381. The Prime Minister had been summoned by the 
 defence to prove that the objects of the reform movement in which he 
 had taken a part were similar to those of the agitation with which 
 Home Tooke and Major John Cartwright were connected. In his 
 imaginary conversation between Pitt and Canning, Landor makes Pitt 
 say : ' e I deferred from session to session a reform in Parliament, 
 because, having sworn to promote it by all means in my power, I did 
 not wish to seem perjured to the people. In the affair of Maidstone 
 nobody could prove me so. I only swore I had forgotten what nobody 
 but myself could swear that I remembered." Works, iii. 196. Landor 
 seems to have mixed up the trial of Home Tooke with that of Arthur 
 O'Connor and others. 
 
 2 Trotter adds : " But I should deem it derogatory to Mr. Fox's 
 Memory if I paid any posthumous compliments to the character and 
 talents of a minister, of whom the best that can be said is that he failed 
 through ignorance, and ruined his country through mistake."
 
 PROFLIGACY OF MR. FOX 73 
 
 he will not hurt the feelings of the living ; if 
 dead, it is ungenerous, he says, to attack the 
 character of those who are incapable of making 
 their defence. If any one is guilty of falsehood 
 against the living, let the laws chastise him ; if 
 against the dead, let infamy pursue him ; let his 
 memory be held in detestation. 
 
 Tiberius and Sejanus " rest in the grave " ; but 
 the historian has recorded their actions, and they 
 really seem considerably amiss. Poor Domitian 
 has not even a fly to bear him company, yet 
 some people will be so uncharitable as to whisper 
 things to his disadvantage. It might not indeed 
 have been quite expedient, nor altogether safe, 
 perhaps, to say such strong things in his presence ; 
 but then how vastly more liberal and manly I 
 
 Page 5. " The passions of the vulgar made 
 
 and kept Mr. Pitt minister." 1 
 
 
 
 No, no ; the vices, the profligacy, the perfidy 
 of Mr. Fox made Mr. Pitt minister. He was 
 at length more grave and decent. Peace 
 made the nation thrive, and her prosperity was 
 attributed to Mr. Pitt. The project of the sinking 
 fund 2 was laid before him ; he rejected it ; yet 
 
 1 Trotter adds : " But the vulgar themselves are daily receiving con- 
 vincing proofs how little value they have received for their money." 
 
 * Pitt took the main idea of the sinking fund, which he started in 
 1786, from Dr. R. Price, author of Treatise on Reversionary Annuities, 
 
 1771, and an Appeal to the Public on the Subject of the National Debt, 
 
 1772. When Pitt resolved, says Lecky, upon the reduction of the 
 
 10
 
 74 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 the adoption of it afterwards is the only financial 
 merit which his party can attribute to him. If 
 it is glorious, it is a glory which requires not to 
 be inscribed upon his tomb. Leave it alone, and 
 it will have matter to act upon long enough. 
 
 Page 7. [" When I first had the happiness of 
 knowing Mr. Fox, he had retired, in a great 
 measure, from public life, and was inclining toward 
 the evening of his days. A serene and cloudless 
 magnanimity, respecting the pursuit of power, 
 raised him to an enviable felicity. His habits 
 were very domestic, and his taste for literature 
 peculiarly strong, as well as peculiarly elegant. 
 His love for a country life, with all its simple and 
 never-fatiguing charms, was great. His temper 
 disposed him to enjoy and never to repine. Had 
 his great powers been employed for the benefit of 
 mankind hi literary composition and researches 
 after knowledge instead of being exhausted in 
 useless debates . . . the world, and Europe in 
 particular, would have reaped advantages which his 
 country blindly rejected ; and that great mind, 
 which made little impression upon a disciplined 
 oligarchical senate, would more efficaciously have 
 operated upon the philosophers, the statesmen, and 
 the patriots of Europe."] 
 
 " Had his great powers been employed for the 
 benefit of mankind in composition," they would 
 
 national debt, he received from Dr. Price three separate plans, one of 
 which he adopted with scarcely any change, though without any public 
 recognition of the author. History, v. 324.
 
 POET AND HISTORIAN 75 
 
 have left him a secondary character in history, 
 poetry, or criticism. His verses l have little ease, 
 little imagination, little spirit. In history he has 
 produced by long study what many young men 
 at the universities, with the materials before them, 
 would have produced in one term. Few com- 
 positions have more faults or greater. In criticism 
 he was the admirer of whatever was most regular 
 and orderly the reverse of his own character ; 
 just as the amiable Thomson, mindful of Scotland, 
 lavishes the enthusiasm of his poetry on the 
 odours of spring : 
 
 Ethereal mildness, come, 2 
 
 and the novelists of the Palais Royal are enamoured 
 of modesty and blushes. 
 
 Page 8. " [At a time when other men become 
 more devoted to the pursuits of ambition, or to 
 the mean and universal passion, avarice ; and when 
 their characters accordingly become rigid, and 
 unproductive of new sentiments, Mr. Fox had all 
 the sensibility and freshness of youth, with the 
 energetic glow of manhood in its prime. Knowledge 
 
 1 "Like all men of genius/' Sir James Mackintosh says of Fox, 
 " he delighted to take refuge in poetry from the vulgarity and irritation 
 of business. His own verses have claimed no low place among those 
 which the French call vers de societe." Monthly Repository, September, 
 1807. Perhaps all but his verses to Mrs. Crewe and those addressed 
 to Mrs. Fox " on his attaining the age of fifty," are forgotten. Sydney 
 Smith said : " We are no admirers of Mr. Fox's poetry. His vers de 
 soci&e appear to us flat and insipid. To write verses was the only 
 thing which Mr. Fox ever attempted to do without doing well." 
 Edinburgh Review, 1809. 
 
 1 "Come, gentle spring, ethereal mildness, come." Seasons, i. 1.
 
 76 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 of the world had not at all hardened or disgusted 
 him. He knew men, and pitied rather than con- 
 demned them.] It was singular to behold such a 
 character in England, whose national characteristic 
 is rather philosophic reasoning than the sensibility 
 of genius." 
 
 And surely there is more philosophic reasoning 
 in Mr. Fox than sensibility of genius ; in his 
 writings most certainly. But national character- 
 istics never reach the more elevated regions of 
 mind ; men of genius are not marked by the same 
 reddle as those on the common of the world. 
 Do we find in Pascal any thing of the lying, 
 gasconading, vapouring Frenchman ? On the 
 contrary, do we not find, in despite of the most 
 miserable language, all the sober and retired 
 graces of style, all the confident ease of manliness 
 and strength, with an honest but not abrupt 
 simplicity, which appeals to the reason, but is also 
 admitted to the heart? Let this man, if any, be 
 compared with Demosthenes. He was not less, 
 he hardly could be greater. The same sincerity, 
 the same anxiety, the same fervour, was in both, 
 for the only great objects of a high and aspiring 
 soul, of laudable, perhaps of pardonable, ambition. 
 One was for Athens ; the other was not indeed 
 for Paris or for France, but for what most truly 
 was his country, whose rewards he would lay 
 open to all men.
 
 NATIONAL MONUMENTS 77 
 
 Page 17. " [. . . the most illustrious, but often 
 the most calumniated, of public men in the 
 eighteenth century (C. J. Fox).] No monument 
 yet marks a nation's gratitude towards him." 1 
 
 We have thrown away more money than enough 
 on monuments ; yet I would willingly see in 
 Hyde Park, just above the water, a building 
 like the Pantheon at Rome, with a statue, and 
 only the names, of all our most truly great men 
 from Alfred to Nelson : Sir Walter Raleigh, Sir 
 Philip, and Algernon Sydney, Shakespeare, Milton, 
 J. Hampden, W. Penn, Blake, Locke, Newton, 
 Marlborough, Washington, Franklin, Nelson. 
 These are our most illustrious characters, in poli- 
 tics, war, and literature ; nor can any modern 
 nation produce so many of equal greatness. 
 Bacon I have not mentioned. Him I would re- 
 serve for a station in Westminster Hall. He should 
 have an inscription. One side of the pedestal should 
 contain his sentence on Raleigh ; the other that 
 sentence which was afterwards passed on himself. 2 
 We lost Washington, but he was ours, and death 
 gives him back. No man ever encountered such 
 
 1 Trotter proceeds : ' ' And the all-prevailing ascendency of the 
 system which Lord Bute, Lord North, and Mr. William Pitt suc- 
 cessively defended and propagated, has stifled every parliamentary 
 expression of respect and veneration for the memory of Charles James 
 Fox, while a successful skirmish or a dubious battle unites all parties 
 in conferring honours and rewards ! " 
 
 2 It was Bacon, as High Chancellor of England, who on October 24, 
 1618, Raleigh having been brought before the Council, informed him 
 of its resolution to advise King James to order the sentence of 1603
 
 78 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 difficulties in politics and war: no man ever 
 adapted one to the other with such skill. In 
 fortitude, justice, and equanimity, no man ever 
 excelled him ; no exemplar has been recommended 
 to our gratitude, love, and veneration, by the 
 most partial historian, or the most encomiastic 
 biographer, in which so many and so great 
 virtues, public and private, were united. His 
 name, his manners, his language, his sentiments, 
 his soul, were English ; and the wretches went 
 peaceably to the grave who traitorously separated 
 him from England ! 
 
 Compare the disadvantages he had to encounter 
 in a war against this country with what Mr. 
 Pitt had to encounter against France. America 
 had few soldiers, and no treasury ; Mr. Pitt had 
 a large, well-disciplined army, and the richest 
 exchequer in the world at his disposal. In 
 America there was no union of council, and a 
 scattered population. In England, Mr. Pitt was 
 the leader of a House of Commons in which he 
 could command an absolute majority ; and the 
 people were all within his reach. I have not the 
 heart to pursue the parallel. 
 
 Page 17. " Nor do I think it is one moment 
 
 to be carried out. But the records of the sitting have been lost, and 
 the exact words used by Bacon are not discoverable. MARTIN HUME'S 
 Walter Raleigh. On May 3, 1622, Bacon was sentenced to a fine of 
 40,000 and imprisonment during the King's pleasure, and debarred 
 from sitting in parliament or coming within the verge of the court.
 
 A DEGRADED OPPOSITION 79 
 
 to be admitted that so unfortunate a politician as 
 his parliamentary rival, could have been Mr. Fox's 
 coadjutor in office. Their principles were diametri- 
 cally opposite." l 
 
 Unfortunate he was, indeed ! But Mr. Fox was 
 equally so in every plan and project, and had the 
 additional mortification of being the dupe, twice 
 over, of this slippery and shallow man. The 
 secretary had modestly said before that Mr. Pitt 
 might have acted with Mr. Fox, although 
 subordinately. They changed principles as they 
 changed situations. There is always a thing in 
 England called an opposition, which it is requisite 
 that I should mention, for it has now become so 
 contemptible as scarcely to be an object in the 
 public eye. The principles of Mr. Fox, if the 
 expression may be allowed, and it be conceded that 
 he had any, were violently aristocratical when 
 he was in office, and no less democratical when he 
 was out. His opponent is called a " practical lover 
 of arbitrary power, who in his own person exercised 
 it too long for the glory of his sovereign, or the 
 happiness of his people.' 
 
 "2 
 
 1 Trotter proceeds : " The one (Pitt) was a practical lover of arbitrary 
 power, and in his own person exercised it too long for the glory of his 
 sovereign, or the happiness of his people : the other (Fox) was a sincere 
 friend to a limited monarchy, which is the only species of government 
 recognised by the British constitution, was a benevolent statesman 
 of the first order, and an undaunted advocate for liberty, whether civil 
 rights, or freedom of conscience were concerned." 
 
 1 See last note.
 
 80 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 A very little of it is quite enough for the happi- 
 ness of a people, but the glory of our sovereign was 
 not tarnished by any exercise of arbitrary power. 
 He loved the bustle and dust of a review, 1 and 
 fancied a battle was quite as fine a thing. It was 
 glorious to see, worn out in his service, veteran 
 suits of laced regimentals, and their places supplied 
 with alacrity by others in all their freshness and 
 strength. These were his foibles ; they led to 
 unhappy results ; but he was a virtuous, kind, just 
 man. In reading and in memory (we pass by Pitt) 
 he was not inferior to Mr. Fox ; in judgment they 
 were too equal. He was uniformly moral, and if 
 not always dignified he knew that dignity was 
 more requisite in the second place than in the first. 
 Kings are commanding by their condescension and 
 their beneficence ; ministers, by keeping at an equal 
 distance from the people and from the King. 
 Experience and wisdom are far less conducive 
 to the permanency of their power than a temperate 
 courtesy and a sedate reserve. Those who excited 
 the American war were guilty of high treason; 
 in violating the liberty of the subject, and in 
 advising the sovereign to decline the redress of 
 grievances. Some of these are yet living; and 
 examples of justice after many years are only the 
 more important and the more awful. Justice, 
 
 1 "1 believe your King/' Landor makes Benjamin Franklin say, 
 " to be as honest and wise a man as those about him ; but, unhappily, 
 he can see no difference between a review and a battle." Works iii. 374.
 
 VERY LIMITED MONARCHY 81 
 
 when a nation is flourishing, reposes, but never 
 sleeps. The King was not at any time urgent with 
 his parliament to make encroachments at home or 
 abroad. The fault was totally with the people : 
 they received, and returned as their representatives, 
 men who ought to have been sent in a body to the 
 hulks. 
 
 Page 17. " The other, Mr. Fox, was a sincere 
 friend to limited monarchy" 
 
 I will not quarrel with an old expression, from 
 respect to its very feebleness. I believe he wished 
 it, in general, to be very limited indeed. I know, 
 what is more important, that, by his unsteadiness 
 and duplicity, he has sanctioned the opinion in 
 many, of there being no such thing in existence as 
 political honesty ; and has made the question start, 
 in firmer minds than his own, whether all govern- 
 ments are not nearly alike when viewed closely ; 
 whether it is not almost a matter of indifference 
 which be abolished or which be established ; 
 whether, in short, whatever is best administered be 
 not best. 1 One could hardly imagine, that from so 
 turbulent a spirit 2 there should descend on other 
 men the political optimism of Pope, and the 
 political quietism of Goldsmith. It is true that 
 many things make a man far more miserable, 
 
 1 For forms of government let fools contest, 
 Whate'er is best administer'd is best. 
 
 POPE, Essay on Man, iii. 303. 
 1 Bolingbroke. 
 
 11
 
 82 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 directly and individually, than forms and species of 
 government can do : it is equally so, that nothing 
 makes him more base, and ultimately more 
 wretched, than those ideal ones which he pursues 
 from the craft and imposture of demagogues. 
 Under monarchies of long establishment, there is 
 sometimes an exalted and chimerical sense of 
 honour : if we observe it less frequently in popular 
 or mixt governments, it is because the people have 
 been grossly deceived by those who have exalted 
 and flattered them, and deceit is become, in their 
 opinion, a constituent part, an element of state, or 
 an attribute of power and genius. Confidence, in 
 the mean time, by degrees, grows cold in their 
 rulers and in each other. Every man now begins 
 to seize or to solicit a something from the public, 
 well knowing that his neighbour cannot openly 
 condemn in him what is committed by the 
 members and sanctioned by the head of his own 
 party. Corruption rises higher and higher, taxes 
 are imposed that its channels may be filled to 
 the very brim ; until at last those unfortunate 
 mortals, who considered every thing they saw as 
 an indication of prosperity and abundance, find 
 themselves circumvented by a flood in their own 
 grounds, which they neither can stem nor lower: 
 competence and quiet are their last wishes, and 
 renovation under an absolute monarchy their only 
 hope.
 
 A CABINET OF DRY STICKS 83 
 
 Page 18. "Ministries formed of repugnant and 
 conflicting materials cannot be permanent or 
 efficient." 
 
 Yet Mr. Fox chose, twice, to be a member of 
 such a ministry. 1 
 
 Page 18. "[Every department ought to be 
 filled by men of whom the statesman, who under- 
 takes to conduct the affairs of a nation, has the 
 selection, and on whose principles, as well as 
 talents, he can rely.] The disorder which other- 
 wise takes place from the counteraction of the 
 inferior servants of government, is of the worst 
 kind, paralysing every grand measure of the head of 
 the ministry, and even controuling his intentions." 
 
 What a pretty head of a ministry must it be, 
 which can suffer itself to be counteracted by the 
 inferior servants of government ! but to be con- 
 trouled by them, to be controuled in his very 
 intentions ! no writer could ever conceive such a 
 notion, unless the character of some such minister 
 as Mr. Fox were before his eyes. Was Lord 
 Chatham controuled or counteracted by these 
 inferior servants ? He found indeed opposition in 
 the cabinet, as this bundle of dry sticks is called ; 
 and, like a passionate man, retired. 2 He should 
 have sent his opponents to the Tower, as privy to 
 
 1 In 1783 and 1806. 
 
 2 The elder Pitt and Temple resigned office on October 5, 1761, on 
 the rejection of Pitt's proposals that hostilities should be commenced 
 against Spain.
 
 84 THE KING AND HIS MINISTERS 
 
 the machinations of the Spanish court, and refusing 
 to frustrate them ; contrary to their allegiance, and 
 to their oath as privy counsellors. 
 
 The Spanish war, and open hostilities from the 
 Spaniards, would have commenced before it would 
 be necessary to bring forward the trial ; the nation 
 would have applauded his vigilance, would have 
 appointed him sole arbiter of their fates and 
 fortunes, and would, even to this day, have 
 experienced the beneficial results of his promp- 
 titude and energy. The French, instead of a 
 people which we deprecate, as likely " to eat us up 
 quick, being so despitefully set against us," would 
 have lost all symptoms of so formidable an appetite, 
 would have been no people at all, would have fallen 
 again into their original diversity of nations. 
 
 Page 19. "[The great genius of Mr. Fox, to 
 have been efficient, should have reigned supreme in 
 the management of public affairs. Mr. Pitt, under 
 the wholesome restraints, and instructed by the 
 enlightened mind of that great man, might have 
 conducted a subordinate department with benefit 
 to his country ; but as to co-operation with him, on 
 any system of co-ordinate power, the plan must 
 have been detrimental to the public service, as long 
 as it was attempted, and certainly would have been 
 degrading to Mr. Fox.] The more I have con- 
 sidered, the more 1 am persuaded that his own 
 conception of retirement was the true rule of 
 conduct to follow."
 
 FAULTS OF A COALITION 85 
 
 Certainly, when he had had, long before, the 
 practical proof how unpopular and how inefficient 
 were coalitions. In what country have they ever 
 succeeded ? In what country have they ever failed 
 to be the signal of its subjugation? The trium- 
 virate of Rome was formed in the days of its 
 utmost power and splendour, when the republic 
 was in possession of more and greater talents than 
 ever, when a spirit of public liberty on one side, and 
 a reverence for establishments on the other, were 
 the sentiments that animated the senate and the 
 people. Yet Rome fell under the coalition. What 
 then could be expected in England ? Not an 
 individual was in political existence in whom 
 posterity will see anything to imitate or admire. 
 The national spirit was gone ; even party was 
 indifferent and torpid. We appeared to be at the 
 conclusion of some great, solemn feast, when the 
 mighty host and illustrious company had departed ; 
 when a single lamp in the center showed the 
 magnitude of the hall and the remains of the 
 entertainment ; arid when a few of the favoured 
 vulgar had been admitted, who were assailing each 
 other with coarse jests and insolent recriminations, 
 and spoiling, and pocketing, and buffeting for the 
 fragments.
 
 CHAPTER IV 
 
 IRELAND AND THE UNION 
 
 Fox and Ireland Character of the Irish Their women of letters 
 Pitt's Irish policy Political peerages Poland and Ireland A 
 point of difference Fox's peers Lord Howick Catholic emanci- 
 pation Religious disabilities. 
 
 Page 25. " [As my acquaintance commenced 
 with Mr. Fox toward the evening of his days, and 
 at the period when a rebellion in Ireland was 
 followed by what has been fallaciously styled a 
 Union, I had the opportunity of observing his 
 great humanity, and his freedom from prejudice, 
 in regard to that country. In this respect he ever 
 seemed to me to stand alone, among English poli- 
 ticians, many of whom are liberal enough in their 
 own way, but all of whom agree in a love of 
 dominion, and in a certain degree of contempt 
 respecting the Irish, which, one day or other, will, 
 I fear, generate events fatal to the repose of both 
 islands.] There is no nation in Europe, perhaps, 
 more contracted in their way of thinking, or less 
 fit to establish a conciliatory government, than the 
 English." 
 
 No two nations in Europe, I do believe, are so 
 utterly dissimilar as the English and Irish ; and, 
 what would be incredible to a foreigner, no two 
 
 86
 
 TRUE IRISH GENTLEMEN 87 
 
 know so little of each other. Yet, whatever the 
 government may do, the English people admire 
 and love the Irish, although in general we see 
 bad specimens : idlers, gamesters, and fortune- 
 hunters, or persons who, in their own country, 
 have tried indifferent talents unsuccessfully. Men 
 of family there are usually very courteous, seldom 
 very well-informed, never very correct or con- 
 versant in matters of literature or taste. Contrary 
 to what happens everywhere else, the middle 
 rank is the worst. A want of polite literature 
 is supplied by crude extracts from Curran and 
 Grattan, by splinters of metaphor, and by sentences 
 half truism and half paradox. Among these, 
 proofs of gentility and good breeding lie in a 
 species of courage which is common to a cur ; 
 a readiness to attack, and an impatience to be 
 caught or corrected. But in few countries are 
 there truer gentlemen, if that character can exist 
 independent of high cultivation, and unadorned 
 by the fine arts. The ladies have thrown most 
 lustre upon Ireland. Miss Brooke, 1 Mrs. O'Neill, 
 Mrs. Tighe, Mrs. Hamilton, Miss Edgeworth, 
 have lived, I believe, mostly in that country. 
 Swift and Burke, and Sterne and Goldsmith, were 
 properly English ; for if we speak rationally and 
 worthily of mind, we are to trace by what 
 
 1 Charlotte Brooke, died 1793, published Reliques of Irish Poetry. 
 Mrs. Tighe (Mary Blackford) wrote Psyche and other works. Mrs. 
 Hamilton wrote Memoirs of Agrippina (1811).
 
 88 IRELAND AND THE UNION 
 
 methods and whence it drew its lineaments, by 
 what associates or rivals it was excited, by what 
 events it was modified, by what encouragements 
 it was fostered. Men possessing it are to be 
 looked for in their works and their societies ; not 
 among parish-registers and vestry-rooms. 
 
 Page 25. " [Had the benevolent and enlarged 
 mind of Mr. Fox directed their councils, during 
 the twenty years preceding his death, this narrow 
 system would not have prevailed, but Ireland 
 might have been really united, by the firm bonds 
 of gratitude and interest, to Great Britain. The 
 state of things arising in Europe required the most 
 enlightened and improved policy in English states- 
 men. The coercive energy of the new military 
 government in France was alone to be counter- 
 poised, and met, on the part of these islands, by a 
 still more vigorous spirit, produced by the conscious 
 possession of civil rights, and a renovated constitu- 
 tion.] To enter the lists with the great military 
 chieftain of the French, without similarity of means 
 or situation, has proved a want of knowledge of 
 England's true strength," l etc. 
 
 Rome had not the same situation or means as 
 Carthage, yet she warred against Carthage, and 
 successfully. No knowledge of her true strength 
 was wanting. It is because our means and situation 
 are different from those of France, that we have 
 not suffered more from her, that we might have 
 
 1 The sentence ends : "rather than the foresight of wisdom."
 
 SHALLOW POLITICIANS 89 
 
 suffered less, that we could have laid nearly all 
 the sufferings on her side. Military writers I 
 mean writers who were military men recommend 
 a diversity of weapons, such as the enemy is not 
 expert in, or prepared for. We were forced "to 
 enter the lists with the great chieftain " : the 
 moment we leave those lists we shall have 
 nothing to which we can return. Horrible as 
 the idea is, this is truly a bellum internecinum, 
 if not between England and France, between 
 England and Napoleon Bonaparte. I do not 
 deny that we might have been safe at peace with 
 him, but under our present system we could not. 
 A minister will find it as difficult to abandon as 
 to pursue. It must crumble to pieces of itself; 
 it cannot be repaired nor taken down. The super- 
 structure is extensive and cumbrous, the founda- 
 tion narrow and weak. Like other heavy and 
 disproportioned bodies, while it continues in 
 motion it keeps together ; the instant of its ces- 
 sation is that of its dissolution. Whether good 
 or evil is the probable result, it were more curious 
 than prudent to inquire. Weak reasoners and 
 shallow politicians, to whose bounded view com- 
 mercial distresses appear like national disabilities, 
 let them be aided in the attempt by all the natural 
 restlessness of men left naked after carousing, 
 will never make the people of England seek an 
 
 inglorious, ignominious security, in a second 
 
 12
 
 90 IRELAND AND THE UNION 
 
 reliance on so perfidious an enemy. Changes of 
 government did not, amidst all the turbulence 
 of the French nation, promote or retard its 
 movements against the coalesced powers, and are 
 likely to have still less influence on us. 
 
 Page 26. "Mr. Pitt treated Ireland like a 
 conquered country." l 
 
 He did worse. He pensioned and ennobled the 
 vilest rascals of every province, of every county, 
 almost of every town and hamlet. Not content 
 with this indignity and insult, fellows in whose 
 family there never was a gentleman, a scholar, 
 or decent member of society, were sent from 
 England into their house of lords. How many 
 brave men, and Irishmen too, had fought her 
 battles and bled for her, without any distinction 
 bestowed on them even from the ribbon-shop, 
 while iniquitous lawyers and insolent tradespeople 
 received the highest honours of the state ! While 
 a Nelson was lingering in poverty, and soliciting 
 only those hardships and sufferings which were 
 to work out the salvation of his country, a blanket- 
 maker and the bastard of a scullion were ennobled. 
 The former took the true Irish title of Cloncurry, 
 the latter the Arcadian one of Riversdale. 2 We 
 
 1 Trotter proceeds : ' ' And chose to build upon the hollow submission 
 of slaves, rather than strengthen himself by the support of free men." 
 
 3 Robert Lawless, the father of the first Lord Cloncurry, began life 
 as an errand-boy in the shop of a Dublin woollen draper. His son
 
 A ROTTEN ARISTOCRACY 91 
 
 must travel into the wastes of Poland to find so 
 rotten and rude an image of aristocracy. In 
 addressing a foreigner of distinction, I could not 
 help making this difference : in Poland every thing 
 was noble that was not a slave, in Ireland every 
 thing that was. 1 Is it then aristocratical pride 
 of which Mr. Pitt is to be accused ? What 
 democrat, however rancorous and malicious, could 
 more effectually debase nobility ? But these up- 
 starts who were ushered into the Irish house 
 of lords were very rich. Many people would 
 willingly be very rich, without a premium for 
 the trouble of being so. Here I may, and do 
 most gladly, commend the conduct of Mr. Fox. 
 He raised men of ancient or distinguished family 
 to the peerage ; a thing which is never invidious 
 even to those who possess not that advantage. 
 This alone proves how great the difference is, in 
 the public estimation, between those who have 
 scraped up money from all quarters, and those 
 whose consequence has a local habitation and a 
 name ; who are conspicuous in the country ; whose 
 families are seen somewhat separate from others, 
 
 Nicholas was created a baronet in 1776, and a peer in 1789. In 1799 
 he wrote to the Duke of Portland : " If I have obtained any honours 
 they have cost me their full value." Colonel William Hull, who took 
 the name of Tonson, was created Baron Riversdale in 1783. This 
 peerage is extinct. 
 
 1 The same remark is made in Landor's imaginary conversation 
 (never reprinted) between Lord Mountjoy (afterwards Earl of Blessing- 
 ton) and Lord Edward Fitzgerald. See Madden's Lady Blessington, 
 ii. 426.
 
 92 IRELAND AND THE UNION 
 
 and remembered individually ; who set examples 
 of agricultural improvement ; who promote healthy 
 industry and honest independence, cleanliness and 
 comfort, competence and sobriety. A great leader 
 in the cause of parliamentary reform, until he 
 became one who might have promoted it, 
 abandoned so far the errors of democracy, that, 
 when he was appointed first lord of the admiralty, 1 
 and old captains of the navy waited on him, he 
 would not invite them or permit them to be 
 seated. This is a piece of impudence and hardness 
 of heart (ever inseparable !) to be credited only 
 by those who know the man. How different 
 from the urbanity, and right feeling, in social life, 
 of Mr. Fox ! 
 
 Pages 26-7. "[1 can truly testify that in the 
 shocking times of 1798, and during the degrading 
 scene which crowned them, Mr. Fox yearned over 
 Irish misfortunes with a truly paternal heart. . . . 
 I distinctly recollect the horror excited in him, on 
 hearing of the burning of cottages and their furni- 
 ture by the military, and the pain he felt on reading 
 the accounts of the actions between the insurgents 
 and the army. How well I remember the valu- 
 able cautions he gave me, when the acuteness of 
 my feelings for a suffering country prompted hasty 
 and momentary expressions of anguish ! His 
 opinion, which is given in one of the letters 
 annexed to this volume, when the Union was 
 
 1 This must refer to Lord Howick, afterwards Earl Grey, First Lord 
 of the Admiralty in the Ministry of all the Talents.
 
 CATHOLIC EMANCIPATION 93 
 
 agitated in Ireland, will be found solid and 
 important.] I do not take upon me to assert that 
 his opinion went so far as to imply the re-admission 
 of Catholics to the parliament of their country." 
 
 Yet his opinion went so far as to countenance 
 a revolt, if they found themselves strong enough, 
 on withholding from them their natural and just 
 rights. Is a man unfit for jurisprudence or tactics, 
 because he believes what those forefathers of ours 
 believed, who framed for us whatever is most 
 valuable in our constitution, and acquired for us 
 that glory and renown in war, and nourished and 
 disciplined us to that prowess, without which a 
 set of commissaries and contractors and shop- 
 keepers must have debated somewhere else whether 
 the descendants of these brave men should be 
 permitted to utter their sentiments in parliament ? 
 Are the debates in that house likely to be about 
 no other matters than religion ? and if Catholics 
 think erroneously on that subject, must they think 
 erroneously on all? But whether on this or any 
 other, what danger is there that they will constitute 
 a majority?
 
 CHAPTER V 
 
 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 Fox as a historian Compared with Sallust Fox's visit to France The 
 lessons of history Fox and Bonaparte Voltaire on Machiavelli 
 An incident at Calais Arthur O'Connor Sir Francis Burdett 
 In Flanders Empress Catharine of Russia The tree of Liberty 
 Rights of man. 
 
 \Pagc 29. " The peace, or rather the truce, of 
 Amiens, in 1802, very naturally excited in Mr. Fox 
 a desire to visit the Continent. His historical work 
 had advanced a good way, but, as he approached 
 the reign of James II., he felt a want of mate- 
 rials which he understood could alone be supplied 
 in Paris, and he determined to go there. That 
 work has since appeared, and the public have 
 formed their opinion upon it. I do not hesitate 
 to say that it would have been desirable that he 
 had gone further back, or chosen a larger period, 
 and one unconnected even by analogy with modern 
 politics. An involuntary association of ideas and 
 feelings . . . may have had an influence, unsus- 
 pected by the author, and have led to his dwelling, 
 as it has appeared to some, with prolixity upon 
 peculiar passages in the unhappy reigns of Charles 
 and James."] 
 
 Page 30. " The goodness of his heart and 
 the grandeur of his mind, the just medium of his 
 opinions between the crown and democracy, and 
 
 94
 
 SALLUST AND MR. FOX 95 
 
 his warm love of true and rational liberty are, 
 however, indelibly recorded in a work which per- 
 haps came out too soon after his death to be justly 
 appreciated." 
 
 The histories of Sallust and Livy came out before 
 the death of their authors, and at a time when 
 party was more violent, leaders more powerful, 
 and changes more stupendous, than we have wit- 
 nessed in our country ; yet the productions of 
 these men were appreciated in their times as easily 
 and highly as in ours. If we except a pristine 
 vigour of style, a masterly and rapid delineation 
 of character, a display of eloquence, like the 
 annona 1 given to the Roman people, magnificent 
 but unostentatious ; and, instead of all this, bring 
 before us a man complaining of degeneracy, 
 luxury, intemperance, immodesty, and gaming, 
 and of corruption flowing into public life from 
 all these separate channels, and presently see him 
 rioting or reposing on every one successively, we 
 shall discover no obscure, or faint, or partial re- 
 semblance between Sallust and Mr. Fox. Sallust, 
 of all the Romans, is the one who impresses me 
 most with the idea of a great genius. Undoubtedly 
 his work was laboured, but we cannot discover 
 in it the separate strokes of labour. He is said 
 to have affected an antiquity of phrase, more 
 
 1 The corn and other provisions sold at a cheap rate to the poor in 
 the latter days of the Roman republic, and given freely under the 
 emperors.
 
 96 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 probably of orthography ; but his language has 
 all that harmony which predominant sense strikes 
 out. I could as easily find it in the verses of 
 Racine as in the history of Mr. Fox. Sallust 
 was very impartial. It is owing to him that in 
 schools and colleges Cato is not merely the rival, 
 but the superior of Caesar. He appears to equal 
 him in eloquence, and to surpass him in dignity. 
 We may leave to Cato all of his integrity ; but 
 in literary, in political, in military resources, in 
 forbearance, in clemency, and I think also in the 
 justice of his cause, Sallust might fairly have 
 represented him as secondary to Caesar. Mr. Fox 
 falls infinitely short of that impartiality. That 
 Charles, who sold his country to the French king, 
 descended to the grave without first mounting 
 the scaffold, is an eternal reproach to the English 
 name ; but it is no reproach to Charles that he 
 ordered those who attempted it to execution. 1 
 
 Pages 30-31. " [I was wandering among the 
 beauties of North Wales, when a letter from 
 Mr. Fox reached me, stating his intention of 
 going to France, in furtherance of his historical 
 work, and adding that I could be of use in copy- 
 ing for him in Paris. . . . The friendly eye which 
 had penetrated these recesses and the hand which had 
 
 1 Of Charles II. Fox wrote : ( ' I doubt whether a single instance can 
 be produced of his having spared the life of any whom motives, either 
 of policy or revenge, prompted him to destroy." Reign of James II. , 
 p. 62.
 
 A REGENERATED FRANCE 97 
 
 beckoned me to leave these calm and rural haunts, 
 to behold a new order of things in the powerful 
 kingdom of France, were recognised by me as 
 heralds of friendship and beneficence ; but his 
 active benevolence manifested on this occasion 
 filled me with grateful surprise. Reader, such a 
 character was Mr. Fox !] To raise up the neglected, 
 and aid those whom scanty means might keep 
 pining at home, or languishing in obscurity, was 
 his bright characteristic." 
 
 What latent talents did he bring forward ? The 
 least he could do was to have taken care that those 
 who lay three in a bed l should have been tolerably 
 clean, but he took no care about that matter. 
 
 Page 36. " [As the packet passed through the 
 glittering waves with a brisk and easy motion, 
 my mind was suspended, as it were, between various 
 sensations and ideas. We had left the proud coast 
 of Albion to visit the regenerated kingdom of 
 France. The long-enjoyed power of the Bourbons 
 had vanished before the irresistible course of events.] 
 We were about to change our imaginations and 
 opinions for certain ideas ; we were to judge for 
 ourselves, and, disencumbering our minds of the 
 false impression unavoidably made on those distant 
 from the theatre of a great revolution, we were to 
 be enabled to form a just opinion of effects, and 
 to examine and analyse causes [in the political or 
 moral sphere of men, or, as I may now express it, 
 of Imperial France. 2 ] " 
 
 1 See footnote, p. 53. 
 
 2 Trotter is describing the journey of Mr. Fox and himself to France 
 in the summer of 1802. 
 
 13
 
 98 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 Here are so many words that I cannot get into 
 the middle of them or see through them in any 
 way. What certain ideas did Mr. Fox or his 
 party give in exchange for their imaginations 
 and opinions ? These, it appears, were to be 
 exchanged for something, and I can easily think 
 any thing an equivalent. Did they not judge 
 for themselves before ? and for the people, too ? 
 But they were aware, it comes out, that they still 
 had to disencumber their minds of false impres- 
 sions. " To analyse causes " was beyond their 
 power ; but to " form a just opinion of effects " 
 was certainly much wanting to Mr. Fox, who had 
 reasoned wrong on them in every period of the 
 revolution. 
 
 Page 38. " [. . . Mr. Fox's feelings respecting 
 Bonaparte. Raised himself, as I think, upon a 
 greater eminence, he could not, as I did, look with 
 the same astonishment at the stupendous character 
 of that great man ; but he could not be devoid of a 
 desire, common to us all, of seeing and hearing one 
 of the most eminent persons of the age.] He, to 
 whom the histories of Greece and Rome were so 
 familiar, looked with a philosophic eye upon his 
 (Bonaparte's) exaltation." 
 
 It is a pity that men to whom these histories 
 are so familiar should read them for no other 
 purpose than to improve their knowledge of the 
 language, or to amuse them, rather than to
 
 AUTHORS AND THE STATE 99 
 
 instruct them, in the difficulties of state. How 
 little advantage has been derived to Mr. Pitt and 
 Mr. Fox from the experience of past ages 1 Mr. 
 Pitt, 1 indeed, had as profound a contempt for 
 literature and literary men as ever was avowed 
 or felt by Attila and Totila ; but Mr. Fox was a 
 man of extensive and not superficial reading, and, 
 on many occasions, of serious and of deep reflec- 
 tions. The historians of Greece and Rome present 
 to us almost every possible contingency, a narrative 
 of almost every experiment, and a statement of 
 every result. It requires too large a portion of 
 human life for a person of active and official 
 employment to examine into and deliberate on 
 all : a man of sagacity, not even equalled by any 
 of these great writers, has detailed them all, most 
 clearly and completely. Mr. Fox was a lover, it 
 is said, of Italian literature 2 ; and surely no man 
 of letters could read with haste or indifference 
 the works of Machiavelli. His two comedies, 
 highly praised by Voltaire, 3 1 pass over as very 
 
 1 Speaking of William Pitt, Mr. Lecky says: "In the disposal of 
 his vast and varied patronage, no minister showed himself more 
 perfectly and uniformly indifferent to the interests of science and 
 literature." The same writer describes Pitt as " quite without Fox's 
 power of casting off the ambitions of politics, and finding in books a 
 sufficient aliment for his nature." History of England, v. 347-8. 
 
 3 " For God's sake," Fox wrote to FitzPatrick from Florence, on 
 September 22, 1767, " learn Italian as fast as you can, if it be only to 
 read Ariosto." 
 
 3 " Few have hesitated," says Hallam, " to place Machiavelli's Man- 
 dragola and C'litia above Ariosto's comedies." Literary History, i. 439. 
 Macaulay thought the Mandragola inferior only to the best of Moliere.
 
 JOO VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 vile productions, and find little to commend in 
 the life of Castruccio Castracani. I never smiled 
 at the witty things attributed to him, and attri- 
 buted to others long before ; but surely The 
 Commentary on Livy and The Prince are the 
 two most valuable gifts a mortal ever bestowed 
 on his fellow-creatures. If you will surrender 
 your rights and liberties, look into these books, 
 and you will see the consequences. A prince, to 
 fulfil his destinies, must pursue this line of con- 
 duct. The cases and changes which may occur, 
 and influence the fate of nations, are, in my 
 opinion, quite as worthy of our study as those 
 which are propounded by Hoyle for the game of 
 whist. Ministers of a great nation should be 
 chosen neither drowsy from the gaming-houses 
 nor fresh from the university. The historian of 
 Florence was not only a speculative politician, 
 but he wrote also on the practice and stratagems 
 of war. He first, amongst the moderns, recom- 
 mended the general use of infantry, and pointed 
 out its superiority to cavalry. Most of his remarks 
 on these subjects are borrowed from the ancients : 
 the Chevalier de Folard, 1 in criticising him, should 
 
 Voltaire said : "La seule Mandragore de Machiavel vaut peut-etre 
 mieux que toutes les pieces d'Aristophane." (Euvres, 1785, xviii. 99. 
 Landor, in his Imaginary Conversations, makes Alfieri say : " The 
 great Machiavelli is, whatever M. de Voltaire may assert to the 
 contrary, a coarse comedian." Works, iv. 272. 
 
 1 Landor wrote, in his Letters to Lord Liverpool : " An attentive 
 perusal and a right understanding of two excellent books have enabled
 
 BONAPARTE'S TUTORS 101 
 
 have remembered this, as also the use of the pike, 
 which he strenuously advises. The Chevalier 
 himself has recommended these after him, and 
 places a higher value on the skill, and arms, and 
 military machines of the Romans than on those 
 of modern war. Bonaparte has made himself 
 emperor by following their maxims. The right 
 use of a sensible book has produced the conquest 
 of Europe. We English seem to have abandoned 
 all stratagems and expedients : we try nothing 
 new but strings and tassels ; we recur to nothing 
 old but whiskers. 
 
 [Page 40. "An incident occurred at Calais, 
 which, as it excited much remark, and roused a 
 good deal of censure at the time, I shall advert to 
 more at length than would otherwise be necessary. 
 It happened that Mr. Arthur O'Connor 1 had 
 arrived at the inn at which we stopped. . . . He 
 waited on Mr. Fox, was received by him with that 
 
 a petty officer of artillery [Bonaparte] to confound all the wisdom and 
 baffle all the energies of the world. The Prince of Machiavelli, and 
 the translation of Polybius by Folard, are the cup and wand of this 
 Comus," p. 71. The Chevalier de Folard's Commentary on Polybius is 
 printed in the seventh volume of a translation of Polybius (Amsterdam, 
 1753), made by V. Thuillier, a kinsman, probably, of Laudor's father- 
 in-law. M. de Folard served with distinction in the French army, and 
 died in 1752. Gibbon says he treated the subject of ancient machines 
 with great knowledge and ingenuity (Decline and Fall, i. 162 n.). 
 
 1 Arthur O'Connor, Irish patriot, was tried at Maidstone, in May, 
 1798, on a charge of high treason, along with James O'Coighy and 
 others. Fox, Lord Moira, and Sheridan were among the witnesses 
 called for the defence. O'Connor was acquitted, but remanded to 
 custody on other charges. He was afterwards allowed to leave the 
 country, on disclosing his plans, and went to France, where he married 
 a daughter of Condorcet.
 
 102 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 urbanity and openness which distinguished him, 
 and was invited to dinner by him, which invitation 
 he accepted of. I had never seen this gentleman 
 before. It is well known that, after a long con- 
 finement at Fort George, he, and some other Irish 
 gentlemen, agreed with the Irish Government to 
 expatriate themselves for life. Mr. O'Connor was 
 now on his way to Paris accordingly, when chance 
 brought him to Quillac's inn, at the same time 
 with Mr. Fox."] 
 
 Page 41. " [Perfectly unconnected with govern- 
 ment, and travelling as any other English gentle- 
 man of noble birth, Mr. Fox found no difficulty in 
 receiving this gentleman (whom he had known 
 before he was so deeply implicated in Irish politics) 
 with a friendly and consoling welcome.] Mr. 
 O'Connor dined with us [and I, for one, was much 
 pleased with his deportment and appearance, 
 though] I could not become, in a manner, a 
 convert to his arguments to prove that he and his 
 party had not attempted [or desired] to rouse the 
 physical strength of his country, to effect a change 
 in Ireland." 
 
 In what manner not become a convert to the 
 arguments ? What arguments were necessary ? 
 Did he deny the fact ? Who can hesitate to 
 believe that he did desire to raise the physical 
 and every other strength of the country to effect 
 a change in Ireland ? Can any honest man blame 
 him, if, when all other means had first been tried, 
 he tried the courage and constancy of the people 
 to effect a change ? Were not rights withholden
 
 SIR FRANCIS BURDETT 103 
 
 from Irishmen, as precious to them as those which, 
 being withholden from the Americans, roused their 
 physical strength, the exertion of which was 
 applauded by Mr. Fox ? What defence then is 
 necessary to this gentleman, if he received a former 
 friend who suffered for principles like his own? 
 It required no dignity or benevolence to act as 
 he did ; to have acted otherwise would, to him 
 at least, have been extremely base, a species too 
 of baseness very uncongenial with his character. 
 It would have been a kind and a degree of un- 
 manliness to be found only under the frozen 
 temperature of such a soul as Pitt's. 
 
 Page 43. "[A recent speech of a celebrated 
 baronet has recalled to my mind what we heard 
 either at Calais, or some other French town, 
 relative to Sir Francis Burdett.] It had been 
 reported to us that Sir Francis, on landing at 
 Calais, had been designated, with a design to flatter 
 him, as the friend of Mr. Fox, and that he had 
 turned round and instantly corrected the expression, 
 by saying ' No, that he was Vami du peuple." 
 
 Sir Francis Burdett is not censurable for choosing 
 to rest his claim to respectability on his own basis. 
 Mr. Fox and Sir Francis might have been friends, 
 and yet Sir Francis might prefer some other 
 designation than merely the friend of Charles Fox. 
 
 Page 43. ["The baronet in a late speech has 
 said : ' he is not the friend of Caesar or of Pompey,
 
 104 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 but the friend of the people.' I had the pleasure 
 of meeting him at St. Anne's Hill, before he had 
 attained any of his subsequent celebrity. I then 
 thought him pleasing, though tinged with vanity, 
 which, perhaps, in the society of Mr. Fox, was 
 more peculiarly conspicuous, because the powerful 
 lustre of his great, yet unassuming character 
 rendered the tinsel glare of any superficial pre- 
 tensions strikingly obvious. ... I own that when 
 I heard this ' disclaimer ' at Calais, I was not led 
 to entertain a more elevated idea of Sir Francis 
 Burdett's character than I had originally 
 conceived."] 
 
 Page 45. " [Was not Fox an honourable and 
 dignified friend, worthy of being assigned to Sir 
 Francis Burdett ?] Did it become him to turn and 
 disclaim the title, in order to assume the far less 
 solid glory of I ami du peuple ? " 
 
 So then at last the naked and unblushing truth 
 comes forth, that the partizans of Mr. Charles Fox 
 are strictly and exclusively his, and would rather 
 both be thought and be so, than defend the 
 liberties of their country. A great deal more is 
 said about Sir Francis Burdett, of his vanity, his 
 tinsel glare, etc. I have seen this gentleman, not 
 among mobs, nor at public dinners, but in the 
 society of his friends, and I observed no tinsel or 
 vanity ; yet these are sooner seen than any thing 
 else about a man. I have mentioned what I saw ; 
 I think it just, and have neither the leisure nor the 
 inclination to say, or to know, more of him.
 
 RUSSIA AND THE TURKS 105 
 
 Page 51. "[On entering that part of modern 
 France, so well known by the appellation of the 
 Netherlands, the glorious scene of human pros- 
 perity, and of rural happiness and plenty which 
 opened before our delighted eyes, was a true feast 
 to the mind.] Flanders had long enjoyed a liberal 
 portion of rational liberty." l 
 
 It was necessary that she should, otherwise she 
 would sooner have swerved to the side of France. 
 But no policy is sufficient to countervail the grasp- 
 ing disposition of despotism. Perpetual attempts 
 had been made to strip little after little from her 
 immunities. 2 Joseph, like Catharine of Russia, 
 was a silly and restless meddler, eternally shifting 
 and transplanting. Catharine might, on several 
 occasions, have utterly destroyed the power of 
 Turkey. But at one time a mere intrigue occu- 
 pied her ; at another she was driving a part of 
 her subjects from their country and bringing 
 another into it, or was quelling a revolt which 
 such cabinet arrangements had excited, or her 
 armies were pursuing those who took refuge in 
 Tartary and China from her maternal solicitude. 
 Instead of these tricks and finesses, she should 
 
 1 Trotter proceeds : " Its independence, sanctioned and guaranteed 
 by so many imperial sovereigns, had, until the reign of the visionary 
 despot, Joseph II., given it all the just fruits of liberty, peace, 
 abundance, and security." 
 
 3 " The dismantling of fortresses, which took place through the 
 policy of Joseph II., had, some years later [after 1795], a considerable 
 effect in rendering the conquest of the Netherlands easy and rapid." 
 LECKY, History of England, v. 355. 
 
 14
 
 106 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 have driven at once the brute force of her empire 
 against the most powerful of her enemies ; the 
 less would be engulfed by the shock, and she 
 might have picked up afterwards a thousand very 
 valuable things, which would have been shivered 
 in all directions by the general consternation. 
 
 [Pages 51, 52. "As we approached St. Omer's, 
 the difference between two very distinct races of 
 men became very perceptible ; and, after passing it, 
 the gradation from French to Flemish was quickly 
 lost in the latter. A larger bodily form, a manifest 
 deficiency in grace, less intellect, but more plain 
 sense, the dress inelegant and cumbrous marked 
 the Flemings. As yet I had seen but little of the 
 French ; but already their gracefulness, politeness, 
 and the general elegance of their forms, had pre- 
 possessed me in their favour."] 
 
 Page 52. "The general elegance of their forms." 
 No nation in Europe is generally so ugly as the 
 French, both in form and features. Such is the 
 involuntary exclamation of every man who passes 
 out of Kent into Picardy. Mr. Fox could see, and 
 could teach others to see, something more than 
 commonly pleasing in every thing like French. 
 
 [Pages 61-3. " On leaving Cassel this day, 
 I began Joseph Andrews. Mr. Fox was much 
 amused by our book ; and though we all subse- 
 quently agreed as to the vulgarity a little too 
 prevalent in Fielding's novels yet his faithful and 
 admirable paintings from human nature afforded us 
 great pleasure. . . . We rattled along in a very
 
 A FADED TREE OF LIBERTY 107 
 
 pleasant manner, going through Billeul, an ugly 
 town, and some other country towns, and, with 
 the help of Joseph Andrews, found not a weary 
 moment. In most of these towns I observed the 
 tree of liberty planted and growing. This memorial 
 of the fury of late events recalled many unpleasant 
 ideas. ... In most places the tree of liberty, 
 though undisturbed, looked sickly, and, as I cast 
 a glance on its fading leaves, I could not but think 
 of the sublime apostrophe made to liberty, in her 
 last agonies, by one of the very brightest of France's 
 ornaments, in her revolutionary days Madame 
 Roland. Yet the excesses into which the French 
 were driven are not less entitled to pity than to 
 blame."] 
 
 Page 64. " The exasperation of the multitude 
 seldom exceeds the boundaries of law and order, till 
 they feel that their complaints are unavailing," etc. 
 
 This ought to have come into the author's mind 
 when he was writing of O'Connor, and of the 
 events in which he bore a part. 
 
 Page 64." [Yet the faded tree of liberty filled 
 me with sorrow. I sighed over the inevitable 
 result of the revolution in France, arising from the 
 preponderance of bad men and turbulent factions.] 
 The tree is faded, thought I, but the rights of 
 man will endure for ever." 
 
 So there will always exist in the human mind 
 the ideas of truth and equity, but we want to 
 see truth and equity in some other places. Their 
 being in the human mind and their not being
 
 108 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 found elsewhere is the mischief. We desire to 
 see them moving about, gaining strength, doing 
 and communicating good. There is no nation in 
 Europe which has not surrendered a great portion 
 of its rights except the Spanish, and that nation 
 has lost much of the territory over which those 
 rights should have extended. For the recent 
 avowal of her principles she will soon, under 
 some pretext or other, be abandoned by our 
 government, which gains nothing by experience 
 but hatred of it, and brings nothing to liberty 
 but regret. 
 
 Page 64. " Dynasties may be erected, generals 
 become monarchs, the people be depressed, but 
 liberty is enthroned in the heart of man, is the 
 boon of his Creator, and the cloudless jewel of life." 
 
 Mighty fine and precious is this cloudless jewel, 
 if kings can pull it out of our bosoms, or cheat 
 us, like ring-droppers in the streets, with some- 
 thing base and worthless instead. Liberty, to 
 use a homelier phrase, is a thing which people 
 may be so long without as to lose all appetite 
 for it. This "throne of the human heart," on 
 which the secretary has personified and in- 
 augurated it, is often abdicated. Some prefer a 
 tangible pension to what they consider as an 
 imaginary being at the best ; others, who have 
 contemplated her more nearly, have been induced 
 by the conduct of such people as Mr. Fox to
 
 THE PEACE TO COME 109 
 
 forego the trouble and peril of quarrelling about 
 her infidelities. It is better, or rather it is less 
 disgraceful, to resign a thing than to be tricked 
 out of it. This sentiment is natural and universal. 
 We are more willing to show the extent of our 
 strength than of our wisdom. We retain with 
 dissatisfaction what is left us by the unprincipled, 
 and, with all the ardor and promptitude of 
 desperation, transfer it to the powerful. In this 
 frame of mind the indulgence of an angry 
 humour is a sufficient reward for our sacrifice ; 
 after this we are obstinate in maintaining the 
 power we have set up, lest others should reproach 
 us with our rashness. The people of France are 
 ashamed that they dare not resist their oppressor, 
 and hate us from the bottom of their hearts 
 because they know that we despise them for it. 
 These are feelings which will remain in full force 
 so long as the cause of them is in existence, and, 
 if ever we make a peace with them, they will 
 employ themselves in playing only a short inter- 
 lude before the last act. Yet persons who had, 
 what they well merit, the infamy of calling them- 
 selves Foxites, are not ashamed to recommend 
 one. Is this only a folly, or is it a base and 
 sordid despair, which throws itself into the dust 
 lest it should be trampled on ; or is it, as 1 have 
 often suspected, a plea to be urged in future for 
 exemption from pillage and persecution ? Were
 
 110 VISIT TO THE CONTINENT 
 
 I certain that Napoleon could invade this country, 
 and equally certain, as I should be, that my pro- 
 perty, no part of which is movable, would become 
 his prey, still I declare before God I would rather 
 endure the total loss of it than the ignominy of 
 such a peace as he declares shall be imposed on 
 England. There cannot be such miserable drivel- 
 lers as to believe that his actions would be less 
 atrocious than his threats. No power in the 
 universe could keep possession of this island. 
 Artificial heroes, patrons of hatters and tailors, 
 generals who are helped on their horses by their 
 rank, would be forced to retire from duties which 
 they cannot fulfil ; and, after the first gush and 
 conflict of the political elements, every thing would 
 rise or fall to its proper level. Men would go 
 for their value ; what is promissory would be 
 nugatory, every thing sterling would be looked for 
 everywhere, and held at a mighty price. Genius 
 is the creature of necessity : when we wanted no 
 better or braver men than a Pulteney or a 
 Whitelocke, 1 we had them not ; but when the 
 voice of God is heard in the whirlwind men 
 capable of governing will arise. 
 
 [Page 65. "As we approached Lisle, I shut 
 Joseph Andrews, and a new scene opened before 
 us."] 
 
 1 Generals Sir James Murray Pulteney, and Whitelocke. See above, 
 p. 20.
 
 CHAPTER VI 
 
 GHENT AND ANTWERP 
 
 Charles V. and C. J. Fox A fatuous comparison Gustavus Adolphus 
 Beguines French annexation of the Netherlands Importance 
 of Antwerp Street architecture Fallen grandeur Opening of 
 the Scheld Ship-building Future prospects. 
 
 {Page 75. " We entered Ghent. It is a large 
 and magnificent town. The houses are lofty and 
 venerable, as well from the grandeur of their 
 appearance, as from their antiquity. . . . The 
 scenery was well adapted for that wild, yet capti- 
 vating species of romance writing which, from 
 Mrs. Radcliffe's pen, produced so much effect. In 
 Ghent, too, Charles the Fifth, that extraordinary 
 character, uniting so many extremes in itself, was 
 born and often resided."] 
 
 Page 78. " Charles in his monastery and Fox at 
 St. Anne's Hill were contrasts of the most striking 
 nature." 
 
 So were Charles and the Vicar of Wakefield, 
 or, if we must have a real and no imaginary 
 character, Home Tooke. A more instructive 
 parallel might be drawn between two sovereigns, 
 particularly if both had been successful in the 
 train of politics. For instance, Charles V. and 
 
 Gustavus Adolphus. Different from Charles, 
 
 in
 
 112 GHENT AND ANTWERP 
 
 and infinitely greater, was Gustavus Adolphus. 
 Both were conquerors, both were ambitious, both 
 were religious, and equally enthusiastic in their 
 respective creeds. Gustavus died by the hand 
 of an assassin, the Duke of Saxe-Lauenburg ; l 
 it was, however, in the field of battle. Charles's 2 
 end was pitiable, I had almost said contemptible. 
 Gustavus's was consistent with his life. No 
 hours of his existence were consumed in winding 
 up watches or in dropping beads. A series of 
 moral and religious duties formed the rosary 
 which never left his bosom. 
 
 Page 80. " We visited at Ghent a very interest- 
 ing establishment, the residence of the Beguines. 
 [. . . . I have seldom seen any thing more pleasing 
 than this select religious establishment. ... I 
 think that in Protestant countries there is a strong 
 and unjust prejudice against such societies. . . . 
 I was very much gratified at beholding so many 
 amiable and happy females, whose countenances 
 spoke tranquillity and benevolence, and whose little 
 mansions were the abodes of peace, comfort and 
 decency.]" 
 
 I hope Mr. Fox experienced here the same 
 
 1 Francis Albert, Duke of Saxe-Lauenberg, was ' ' supposed by some 
 to have killed Gustavus treacherously and dishonourably in the battle 
 of Liitzen [November 6, 1632] ; or rather to have conspired against his 
 life by giving some secret signal to the Imperialists during the heat 
 of action." REV. W. HAUTE, History of Gustavus Adolphus, 3rd ed., 
 1807, ii. 305. 
 
 * The Emperor Charles V. died at the m onastery of Yuste on 
 September 21, 1558. Robertson's description of his life in retirement 
 has been shown to be inaccurate.
 
 BENEVOLENT SENTIMENTS 113 
 
 sentiments as his friend ; they are very benevolent 
 and very just ; and I do believe he did ; for a 
 part of his heart, in despite of dissipation and 
 politics, was generous and sound. But, although 
 he countenanced not a few superfluities in state, 
 he was somewhat more strict with religion. The 
 Beguines 1 are among the Catholics what the 
 Moravian sisters are among the reformed. So 
 that the secretary is wrong when he fancies that 
 there is in protestant countries a strong and 
 unjust prejudice against such societies. 
 
 Page 84. " [Towards evening we came in view 
 of Antwerp. . . . We had passed through the 
 finest part of Flanders, in the time of harvest, and 
 had, of course, seen it to the greatest advantage. . . . 
 And all this fine country acquired by France : this 
 vast acquisition of strength to her Empire, conferred 
 on her by the blunders, and the blind fury of the 
 allied Powers.] No consequence of the fatal system 
 of threatening the very existence of France as a 
 nation, among many lamentable ones, has been 
 more injurious than that of the annexation of the 
 Netherlands to that power." 
 
 We might have been the arbiters of Europe, 
 we might have liberated, or encouraged the 
 liberation of, the Netherlands from Austria ; and 
 
 1 " ( By thy description, Trim/ said my uncle Toby, ' I dare say she 
 was a young Beguine, of which there are none found anywhere but in 
 the Spanish Netherlands except at Amsterdam : they differ from 
 nuns in this, that they can quit their cloister if they choose to marry." " 
 STERNE'S Truttram Shandy, chap. 264. 
 
 15
 
 114 GHENT AND ANTWERP 
 
 France would gladly have guaranteed their in- 
 dependence. She dreaded us, and us only, and 
 there was a moment when her love of liberty 
 was generous and sincere. Of all the cities she 
 has conquered, Antwerp is the most important. 
 Rome, Milan, Turin, Alexandria itself, are villages 
 in the map of politics, if surveyed with Antwerp. 
 On our side of the Alps hardly any city is com- 
 parable to it in the magnificence of its streets. 
 Where London has one stately edifice, there are 
 ten in Antwerp. In London there are not ten 
 houses whose fronts are grand, or have indeed 
 any kind of pretension to architectural beauty. 
 In Antwerp there are some hundreds whose 
 appearance is imposing and superb. 
 
 \Page 87. " Antwerp was, however, as well 
 as Ghent, a striking exhibition of fallen grandeur. 
 The streets were silent, and grass grew in many 
 parts : the busy stir of man was wanting to 
 animate this immense collection of buildings ; no 
 roll of carriages manifested the opulence and luxury 
 of the inhabitants, the sound of the human voice 
 was little heard, and those animals attendant on 
 man were not seen."] 
 
 " The streets," we are informed, " were silent, 
 and grass grew in many parts." I have heard it 
 asserted that the value of houses has risen since in 
 a quadruple ratio, and that those bordering on the 
 quay sold at from seven to twelve times as much 
 as when Bonaparte came to the supreme power.
 
 THE PORT ON THE SCHELD 115 
 
 Page 88. " [As the Scheld, however, was just 
 opened, there were some symptoms of reviving 
 commerce, and Antwerp has, most probably, ere 
 now, assumed a lively appearance ; although it will 
 require a long time to restore the population, and 
 give energy to the whole mass of this deserted, 
 but magnificent city. The municipal officers 
 waited on Mr. Fox, and we passed the day very 
 agreeably in seeing every thing worthy of attention 
 at Antwerp. . . . The Cathedral is very fine. 
 We saw three good collections of pictures, and the 
 academy of paintings. The French carried away 
 Rubens's best pictures from hence, but two very 
 fine ones have been returned. We did not see 
 the citadel, which we understood was in a good 
 state.] The idea of building ships and restoring 
 the French marine at Antwerp, though in its 
 infancy when we rested there, was however strong 
 and prevalent." 
 
 When we consider that no place in Europe, not 
 excepting Constantinople, is situated so favourably 
 for communication with all the country in every 
 direction round it, if we take also into account 
 the number of forests, the level surface along 
 which the timber may be conveyed to the rivers 
 and the canals, the great population, the moderate 
 price of labour, and the facility of provisioning a 
 great force for a longer time than perhaps any- 
 where else in the universe ; we may then compute 
 the advantages which a vigorous and intelligent 
 sovereign will derive from its possession.
 
 CHAPTER VII 
 
 DUTCH NETHERLANDS 
 
 Breda The Stadtholder England and the Continent Nelson at 
 Naples Prosperity of Holland Commerce and industry Evil 
 of factories Fisheries Amsterdam Republican Governments 
 Greek and Roman Flight of the Stadtholder Murder of the 
 de Witts Fox's humanity and indecision. 
 
 {Page 96. " We entered Dutch Brabant on 
 leaving the French territory. The roads became 
 heavy and sandy, and the country quite uninterest- 
 ing. We now had recourse to Tom Jones, and 
 1 read a great deal of that excellent work aloud 
 on our way to Breda. Mr. Fox enjoyed it very 
 much." 
 
 Page 98. "Breda is remarkable as the residence 
 of the English exiled monarch, Charles II. I viewed 
 it with no respect on that account." 
 
 Page 99. " The deserted gardens of the Prince 
 of Orange (ci-devant Stadtholder) gave me another 
 lesson on the fallacy and unsteadiness of human 
 grandeur.] The Stadtholder, in residing in England, 
 had abandoned his high station, which a truly great 
 man would have preserved, or fallen gloriously 
 resisting the incursion of the French." 
 
 I have nothing to say about the Stadtholder, 1 
 
 1 William IV., Prince of Orange, the hereditary Stadtholder, fled 
 from Holland in January, 1795, on the advance of the French army 
 under Pichegru, who entered Amsterdam in triumph on January 20. 
 
 116
 
 FRANCE AND THE DUTCH 117 
 
 whom no one ever expected to find " a truly 
 great man ; " but truly great men have occasion- 
 ally left a country where irresistible force from 
 external enemies, or the torrent of public opinion, 
 came against them. Both were united against 
 this poor wretched creature. Either would have 
 mastered him. The Dutch opened the gates of 
 all their towns to France, because our government 
 and the King of Prussia stood in array against 
 freedom. We have always made nations our 
 enemies, to conciliate the insects of cabinets, 
 which we have seen invariably, one after another, 
 kicked and trampled into the dust. An example 
 is now unfolding. The Sicilians almost adored 
 us, but we countenanced and subsidised their 
 oppressors ; and for the service of two or three 
 persons, no less weak than faithless, we shall soon 
 encounter all the vengeance of a spirited and re- 
 monstrating people, not afraid, but unwilling to 
 strike, who have been driven by nakedness and 
 want to resume their natural rights. 
 
 Brontesque Steropesque, et nudus membra Pyracmon, 1 
 
 will do something very disagreeable, and perhaps 
 rude, to majesties and marquises and eccellentissimi. 
 The days of hanging, on board of English ships, 
 men who relied on royal promises and naval 
 
 1 Virgil, JSneid, viii. 425.
 
 118 DUTCH NETHERLANDS 
 
 honour, are all over. 1 Woe betide those who 
 intercept or impede the just vengeance of an 
 injured and outraged people. Sicily might be 
 worth more to us than any of our foreign 
 possessions, for with it we might possess the 
 Sicilians. The politician does not measure coun- 
 tries merely by degrees of latitude and longitude ; 
 sugar and coffee and bales of merchandise are 
 not his only goods. He leaves such imperfect 
 estimates to such bare book-keepers as Mr. W. 
 Pitt. "Concordia res parvae crescunt, discordia 
 magnse dilabuntur," 2 is an axiom he applies not 
 merely to the natives of his own country, but 
 to their agreement in friendly and equal inter- 
 course with allies. To have a fellow-feeling in 
 their interests is essentially necessary, and to 
 provide that they do not rot in cold obstruction 3 
 from an arrogant and stupid king. 
 
 Pages 100-101. "[The appearance of Holland, 
 that creation of liberty, industry, and commerce, 
 though a flat country, and quite destitute of the 
 picturesque, is, however, most pleasing to any 
 person of reflection and benevolence. ... 1 cannot 
 
 1 Referring, no doubt, to the execution, by Nelson's order, of Prince 
 Francesco Caraccioli, in 1799, though he was hanged on board the Sicilian 
 frigate La Minerva. Landor writes elsewhere : ' ' What did Nelson ? He 
 tarnished the brightest sword in Europe, and devoted to the most 
 insatiable of the Furies the purest blood ! A Caroline and a Ferdinand, 
 the most opprobrious of the human race and among the lowest in 
 intellect, were permitted to riot in the slaughter of a Caraccioli." 
 Works, vi. 60. 
 
 1 Sallust, Jugurtha, 10. 
 
 3 Shakespeare, Measure for Measure, iii. 1.
 
 quite accede to the poet's description of Holland. 1 
 . . . Commerce, when carried to excess, like most 
 other pursuits of man, becomes pernicious, and 
 productive of ill consequences ; particular instances, 
 too, of avaricious and unfeeling characters engaged 
 in it may lead to an unfavourable opinion of com- 
 merce itself ; but] if any one were disposed to deny 
 its amazingly beneficial effects commerce he has 
 but to look at Holland to be convinced that he is 
 wrong." 
 
 Indeed, indeed, he ought to take a little more 
 trouble, and to look in other places ; at least, if 
 a man is equally zealous to be convinced that he 
 is wrong, as he usually is to be convinced that 
 he is right. Commerce, in some stages of society, 
 and to a certain extent, is useful and beneficial. 
 Fishing, before ardent spirits were common, was 
 an occupation hardly less laudable than agricul- 
 ture, or less important to the strength and 
 resources of a state. It invigorates the body, 
 hardens the mind against despondency and danger, 
 and employs great numbers in healthy occupa- 
 tions. In Holland, marshes were excavated for 
 dockyards, canals were dug for track-schuyts, 
 woods were cleared for timber, room was made 
 for an accession of population, and food was 
 provided in proportion to its increase. Sailors 
 were now become hardy and enterprising ; they 
 
 1 Trotter here quotes Goldsmith's well-known lines in The Traveller, 
 1. 299, etc.
 
 120 DUTCH NETHERLANDS 
 
 embarked for distant voyages, they encountered 
 difficulties, they contended and overcame them. 
 Rivalry grew up, and foreign powers were anxious 
 to participate in their success. Energy was called 
 forth, and what was worth winning was worth 
 enjoying. New means of defence and of attack 
 were resorted to, opposition kept pace with them, 
 and an industrious soon became a warlike, and 
 a warlike a powerful, people. But the commerce 
 which employs many thousands of the young, 1 in 
 crowded rooms, extremely low, among the vapour 
 of lamps, without fresh air and locomotion, and 
 without any separation of the sexes, does mischief, 
 the extent of which it would be painful and dis- 
 gusting to detail. In a general and political 
 view, its ill effects are palpable. It places many 
 under the immediate controul of one, and assails 
 the purity of election. In short, the commerce 
 of manufactories will appear, on the whole, more 
 prejudicial to virtue, to happiness, to health, to 
 independence, than serviceable to the support of 
 any well-regulated state. 2 We must not then be 
 
 1 "The House of Commons/' Landor wrote, in 1829, " has lately 
 passed an Act, by which it is provided that children under nine years 
 of age shall not be obliged to work longer than twelve hours in the day. 
 Do not the wretches deserve to be stoned to death, who thus authorise 
 the infliction of such hard labour on creatures so incapable of enduring 
 it?" Works, in. 282. 
 
 * " Manufactures tend to deteriorate the species, but begin by 
 humanizing it. Happy those countries which have occasion for little 
 more than may supply the home consumption." LANDOR, Works, iii. 
 117, where the first word is misprinted "manufacturers."
 
 PERNICIOUS INDUSTRIES 121 
 
 lavish and indiscriminate in the praises we bestow 
 on commerce, since the species of it I have pointed 
 out is noxious whenever it is extensive, and is 
 more likely to be general than any. Every nation 
 will be now obliged to employ its own hands, 
 and one will employ them more extensively and 
 perniciously than others, and will attempt to start 
 before its neighbours, in a course which leads 
 neither to its strength nor happiness. All nations 
 possessing a sea-coast should extend their fisheries 
 to the utmost. The fisherman has one perpetual 
 harvest-time 1 ; he employs no cattle subject to 
 disease and inactivity, his fences are destroyed 
 by no trespasses, and, if his hopes are disap- 
 pointed, they are however not the hopes of the 
 year. He has another field whenever he chooses 
 to work it, and his profits are not anticipated 
 by the tillage. If we take a general and political 
 view of it, as we did of that species which arises 
 from manufactories, we shall perceive that the 
 nearer men are brought to meet invasion, and 
 the greater number of them, and the more dan- 
 gerous and enterprising their pursuits, a country 
 will be the stronger and the safer. 
 
 1 " A few years ago," Oliver Goldsmith wrote in 1759, " the herring 
 fisheries employed all Grub Street ; it was the topic of every coffee- 
 house, and the burden of every ballad. We were to drag up oceans of 
 gold from the bottom of the sea ; we were to supply all Europe with 
 herrings upon our own terms. At present we hear no more of this. 
 We have fished up very little gold that I can learn." Works, Globe 
 eel., p. 398. 
 
 16
 
 122 DUTCH NETHERLANDS 
 
 {Page 106. "Amsterdam is a noble and populous 
 city, and pre-eminent, I believe, above all others, for 
 the general diffusion of employment, and the total 
 absence of misery and want."] 
 
 Page 107. " [ I could not have imagined a more 
 perfect scene of human occupation and comfort ; 
 the equality of station, and the competency enjoyed 
 by all, afforded that true idea of social perfection 
 which theorists have written and talked so much 
 of, but which few countries have realised in modern 
 times. The distinctions of an aristocratic noblesse 
 and a miserable populace, did not offend the eye.] 
 The youth who studies, and the man who thinks, 
 possess defective notions regarding states, and forms 
 of government, until they travel. The republics of 
 Greece and Rome are well known in history, but 
 their glories and defects are no more to be discerned 
 by the eye of the vigilant observer." * 
 
 If the republics of Greece and Rome are well 
 known in history, how happens it that even the 
 vigilant observer can discern neither their " glories 
 nor defects ? " What then is it we know of 
 them ? I have often fancied that I could discern 
 some glories in the early times of Rome. Livy, 
 and Polybius, and Plutarch, have recorded such 
 things as make me acknowledge 
 
 Scilicet et rerum facta est pulcherrima Roma. 2 
 A little book, such as 1 could carry in my 
 
 1 Possibly through an oversight, Landor transposes the last two 
 sentences in this extract, which is here given as in the original. 
 
 2 Virgil, Georgics, ii. 534.
 
 WISDOM OF THE ANCIENTS 123 
 
 coat sleeve, Fenestella, 1 will give me a short 
 account of the magistratures, etc., if I want one. 
 More great actions of individuals are recorded by 
 even what remains of Livy than by all the English 
 historians put together, and their institutions are 
 as clearly set before us, and as fully, as those of 
 England are in Blackstone's Commentaries. A 
 greater number of profound remarks was made 
 on the governments of Greece and Rome after 
 they existed than during their existence. Aristotle 
 has given a summary view of many, which were 
 established in countries he never visited. Not 
 only the changes and corruption which had de- 
 formed the Roman commonwealth before his time, 
 but also the manners and customs of Germany, 
 are described by Tacitus, the truth of whose 
 description is corroborated by subsequent experi- 
 ence. Yet he never lived or travelled in that 
 country. How many wise and admirable remarks 
 are to be found in the works of Plutarch, and 
 Polybius ! I have mentioned these illustrious 
 men before, yet I cannot refrain from repeating 
 their names, and from expressing my regret that 
 their works are not more studied in schools and 
 colleges. If others have excelled them in style, 
 
 1 A work entitled De Magistratibus Sacerdotiisque Romanorum, was 
 attributed to Lucius Fenestella, a Latin historian who died A.D. 21. It 
 is now believed to have been the production of Dominic Floccus, a 
 Florentine of the fifteenth century. Editions in 16mo were printed 
 at Geneva in 1599, and Cologne in 1607.
 
 124 DUTCH NETHERLANDS 
 
 none afford such varied and such extensive infor- 
 mation, or such an admirable detail of the means 
 by which the greatest men became great. Mr. 
 Fox, I suspect, might have derived more advan- 
 tage from them than from his introduction to the 
 first consul, or his researches in the Scots college, 
 though the latter were proper for his undertaking. 
 
 Page 121. " [Mr. Fox was very much pleased 
 with the Hague, and with this wood, 1 which 
 received admiration from us all. . . . We drove to 
 Scheveling, on the sea shore. . . . Here the 
 Stadtholder embarked when he fled. I believe 
 Holland suffered nothing from his abdication, but 
 when I stood on the shore] I could not refrain 
 from despising the man who flies when his country 
 is in danger ; unless it be that he has governed it 
 ill, and fears the just resentment of his countrymen, 
 in which case I should have been glad to have 
 assisted him into his boat." 
 
 Unless! Is he not quite as despicable in flying 
 with all the consciousness of having governed ill ? 
 There is nothing in which I differ more widely 
 from the secretary than in the sentiment that 
 follows. Instead of helping him into the boat, I 
 should think if my duty to detain him, were he 
 flying from the just resentment of his countrymen, 
 as I would a housebreaker or pickpocket in the 
 same circumstances, if the country that afforded 
 me hospitality demanded it at my hands. In 
 
 1 The Haagsche Bosch.
 
 A DETESTABLE CRIME 125 
 
 doing this, he must first have violated the funda- 
 mental laws of the land, and must afterwards 
 have left the remainder without an executive 
 power. The Stadtholder had, in fact, brought an 
 armed force of foreigners against Holland. The 
 crime is capital. He was virtually outlawed ; and 
 it was the duty of every Dutchman to arrest him 
 and bring him to justice. 
 
 Pages 122-3. " [We saw one picture, however, 
 at the Hague which, as it must fill any person 
 with horror who views it, must derogate a good 
 deal from my praises of Dutch moderation and 
 calmness. I allude to the massacre of the De 
 Witts. The death of these excellent men and 
 true patriots is but too faithfully depicted in a 
 small picture at the Maison de JBois. 1 It excited 
 great disgust in Mr. Fox, and with great reason. 
 . . . Among a thousand instances, this is one 
 which deserves notice, of] Mr. Fox's admirable force 
 of mind, equally reprobating the direful rage of 
 the populace, as the vindictive cruelty of a 
 tyrant." 2 
 
 Though the direful rage of a populace never 
 committed any one action so lamentable and 
 detestable as the murder of the De Witts, yet 
 the vindictive cruelty of a tyrant is still more 
 
 1 The Huisteu Bosch, a royal villa built in 1647 for Princess Amalie, 
 widow of Prince Frederick Henry of Orange. 
 
 1 " It was quite distressing to him," Trotter adds, " to speak upon 
 the catastrophe of the De Witts. His countenance was full of horror 
 at sight of the memorable picture.'
 
 126 DUTCH NETHERLANDS 
 
 abominable, because more lasting and more sys- 
 tematic. So, if Mr. Fox reprobated them equally, 
 he was injudicious and unwise. Let us rather say 
 of him that he abhorred them both. Surely that 
 is no very extraordinary mind, where such a 
 natural and universal sentiment is adduced as an 
 instance of its admirable force. Mr. Fox was a 
 very humane man ; yet by his negligence and 
 indecision such actions were committed and 
 ordered at Buenos Ayres, as produced the death 
 of many brave men, infinite calamity, and indelible 
 disgrace. Just enough of men for a sacrifice were 
 sent also to Alexandria and to Constantinople. 
 If all these had been united in aid of the Russians, 
 many thousands of their army would not have met 
 an untimely end, nor the war have experienced 
 an unsuccessful one. 
 
 Page 124. " [Mr. Fox's disposition taught him 
 to govern at home with parental mildness, and 
 always to conciliate and encourage, rather than 
 terrify ;] his genius led him to choose the grandest 
 measures in foreign politics, and to make war short 
 by making it decided." 
 
 Then his destiny crossed his genius ; for nothing 
 is more contrary to the actual events of his 
 administration.
 
 CHAPTER VIII 
 
 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 Readings in Virgil Orpheus in the Georgics A false note The 
 nightingale Homer and Lucretius The moral of a poem 
 Paradise Lost Episodes in the JEneid Lucan's Pharsalia Virgil's 
 pathos Fox's favourite passages Virgil as a politician Grenville 
 and the French Ambassador Edmund Burke Tom Jones and The 
 Arabian Nights Criticism of contemporaries Dr. Johnson and 
 Miss Seward Fox on Ariosto The shield of Achilles Tasso 
 Ovid Cervantes and the romance writers Spenser and Dante 
 Alfieri Metastasio Greek tragedians. 
 
 {Page 89. " If my readers can pardon the intro- 
 duction of trifles, and my classical ones imagine 
 the delight I felt at reading passages of the JEneid 
 of Virgil with Mr. Fox, they will excuse my 
 mention of another little course of reading on this 
 short tour, on account of the valued name of him, 
 unhappily for the world, no more. I had begun 
 the ^Eneid at St. Anne's Hill previous to our 
 setting out, and had advanced a good way in it 
 before we set off. I continued my reading as 
 opportunity allowed, and Mr. Fox never received 
 greater pleasure than when I ventured to point out 
 passages which pleased me. Of Virgil's ^Eneid he 
 was a true admirer ; and the tincture of melancholy 
 which he thought ran through his work, was by no 
 means displeasing to him." 
 
 Page 125. " There was nothing lively at the 
 Hague. . . . The want of political objects, I was 
 
 127
 
 128 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 able very agreeably to supply, by continuing my 
 reading of the ^Eneid. In this Mr. Fox joined 
 with undiminished pleasure, and here we read the 
 10th book." 
 
 Page 129. " The conclusion of the 10th book, 
 the death of Lausus, and the resistance and fall of 
 Mezentius, Mr. Fox did not fail very much to 
 admire."] 
 
 Page 130. " [In making the death of a tyrant 
 so very unhappy, 1 ] Virgil has shown himself an 
 enemy to oppression and worthy the name of 
 Roman." 
 
 Delightful is it to escape from the cabinet into 
 the fields of literature. Neither our errors there, 
 nor the enemies we meet, are at all prejudicial 
 to the public good. It would have been propitious 
 to the happiness, and to the fame of Mr. Fox, 
 if he had cultivated them more assiduously, and 
 never left them. Every man, I believe, is an 
 enemy to oppression in some cases ; and Virgil 
 was, at all events, " worthy the name of Roman " 
 in poetry. Never was verse more harmonious, 
 sentiments more equi-distant from flatness 
 and hyperbole, or touches of nature more true ; 
 still, contrary to what Scaliger has advanced, the 
 passages which he has translated from Homer are 
 inferior not only to Homer's, but to every thing 
 
 1 JEneid, x. 833 et seq.
 
 ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE 129 
 
 of his own. Even those celebrated lines in the 
 
 Georgics : 
 
 Qualis populea, etc. 1 
 
 will bear no comparison with the original in the 
 Odyssea? The story of Orpheus is admirably 
 told, but the passage has many and gross faults 
 The feelings are always right ; the accompani- 
 ments not always. I shall follow the example of 
 Mr. Fox and his friend in making some remarks 
 on this subject ; not echoing old exclamations of 
 rapture, but pointing out what is bad, occasionally, 
 and throwing light on what is obscure, 
 
 Ignoscenda quidem scirent si ignoscere Manes. 3 
 
 Commentators and translators have imagined 
 the Manes to have been implacable and unmerciful 
 to the fault of Orpheus. On the contrary, they 
 were appeased by honey and flour, and would 
 most willingly, as Virgil means to say, have 
 remitted the forfeit of the unhappy husband, if it 
 had rested with them ; but it was in other hands. 
 At one time he tells us that Proserpine laid down 
 
 1 Qualis populea maerens Philomela sub umbra 
 Amissos quaeritur fetus, quos durus arator 
 Observans nido implumes detraxit : at ilia 
 Flet noctem, ramoque sedens miserabile carmen 
 Integrat, et maestis late loca questibus implet. 
 
 VIRGIL, Georgics, iv. 511. 
 
 * Homer, Odyssey, xix. 518. 
 
 3 Virgil, Georgics, iv. 489. 
 
 17
 
 130 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 the conditions, 1 but just after he attributes them 
 to Pluto. 2 
 
 Septem ilium totos perhibent ex ordine menses, etc. 3 
 
 It is surely no extraordinary thing to lament 
 the loss of a wife for seven whole months ; but 
 the poet adds, " rupe sub aeria." I wish he had 
 not also added 
 
 Mulcentem tigres, et agentem carmine quercus. 
 
 There is nothing of poetry in it, and it shocks 
 probability to no purpose. In Thrace there never 
 were tigers. The coldness of the climate, which 
 was formerly much more intense, would not 
 permit their existence. It would be a bad defence 
 to assert that by tigers he means wild beasts in 
 general. If he intended this, he would have 
 written 
 
 Mulcentemque feras, et agentem carmine quercus. 
 
 The hyperbole which follows is the admiration 
 of all critics, who follow up admiration from 
 tradition, but it is so violent and absurd, that Virgil 
 must have produced it much earlier in life than 
 the other parts of his Georgics: 
 
 Turn quoque marmorea caput a cervice revolsum 
 Gurgite cum medio portans CEagrius Hebrus 
 
 1 Namque hanc dederat Proserpina legem. Ib. 487. 
 
 1 Immitis rupta tyranni foedera. Ib. 492. 
 
 3 Septem ilium totos perhibent ex ordine menses 
 Rupe sub aeria deserti ad Strymonis undam 
 Flevisse, et gelidis haec evolvisse sub antris, 
 Mulcentem tigres, et agentem carmine quercus. Ib. 507
 
 THE PLAINT OF PHILOMEL 131 
 
 Volveret, Eurydicen vox ipsa et frigida lingua, 
 Ah raiseram Eurydicen, anima fugiente vocabat ; 
 Eurydicen toto referebant flumine ripae. 1 
 
 This, it must be remembered, is a description 
 given to Aristseus by Proteus ; had it proceeded 
 from the poet in his own character, the excess 
 would have been more pardonable. 
 
 Qualis populea, etc. 2 
 
 The poplar is not the most likely tree for a 
 nightingale to build her nest in, and indeed it is 
 probable that no instance of it ever occurred. She 
 is always in "shadiest covert hid," 3 and her nest 
 near the ground. The beauty of the passage 
 depends in great measure on our construing it to 
 signify that the nest itself was in the poplar, though 
 the first verse does not express it. But when 
 we come to the words ramoque sedens, then we 
 perceive at once the necessity of this interpretation. 
 
 So Philomel beneath some poplar's shade 
 Bemoans her captive brood ; the cruel hind 
 Saw them unfledged, and took them ; but all night 
 Grieves she ! and, sitting on the bough, runs o'er 
 Her wretched tale, and fills the woods with woe. 4 
 
 1 Ib. 523. Landor makes Home Tooke say : ' ' The Homeric simile 
 of the nightingale, and the silly tale of a head speaking when it was 
 cut off and rolling down a river, and speaking so loud, too, as to make 
 an echo on the banks, is puerile." Works, iv. 235. 
 
 * See note 2 page 129. 
 
 3 Milton, Paradise Lost, iii. 39. 
 
 4 These five lines are from a translation of Georgics, iv. 464-515, 
 which Landor wrote in 1794, when he was an undergraduate at Oxford. 
 He was then nineteen, and he was rusticated the same year. Forster
 
 132 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 Sitting on the bough from which her young 
 were taken. Dryden, Warton, Sotheby, and 
 others in foreign languages, have translated the 
 passage without its principal beauty. It is singular 
 that Virgil, so attentive an observer of nature, 
 should place the nest of a nightingale in a poplar, 
 where it never builds, and should represent that 
 bird as bemoaning the loss of its young aloud 
 Late loca questibus implet 
 
 when it ceases to sing, almost entirely, after its 
 young are hatched. 
 
 I am convinced that nearly all of what Virgil 
 has imitated from Homer were the exercises of 
 his youth ; and that those critics who would 
 institute a comparison between the two great 
 poets, act unfairly and unwisely by adducing these 
 as points of it. The best translation that has 
 ever been made from Homer is not among the 
 many in Virgil, but was immediately before the 
 eyes of Virgil in Lucretius. It is the description 
 of the habitations of the gods : 
 
 found a copy of the translation, in manuscript, with the date. It was 
 not included in the volume of poetry which Landor published in 1795, 
 but was printed in The Examiner, October 16, 1841, with a note in 
 which Landor says : ' ' This has always been called the masterpiece 
 of Virgil, and chosen as the ground of competition by translators. 
 Wordsworth's, which is the last, is among the worst ; Drydeu's (who 
 always compensates with spirit for fidelity) the best ; mine, written at 
 college, has small merit." The " Descent of Orpheus/' as Landor calls 
 the piece, was also printed in The People's Journal, January, 1847 ; in 
 Landor' s Dry Sticks, 1858, with a long note in which passages from the 
 Commentary reappear ; and, without the note, in Works, 1876, viii. 
 290. See also Forster's Landor, i. 38.
 
 VIRGIL'S DEBT TO HOMER 133 
 
 Quae neque concutiunt venti neque nubila coeli 
 Pervolitant neque nix acri concreta pruina 
 Cana cadens violat, semperque innubilis aether 
 Obtegit, et large diffuse lumine videt. 1 
 
 Dr. Jortin has highly praised these verses, 
 forgetting that the original is in the Odyssea? 
 and is certainly the most admirable specimen of 
 Homer's versification. Lucretius follows him 
 closely, and it is only in the very termination 
 that he is left behind. Aev/o) S'e7riSe'Spoju,ej> cuyX^ is 
 inimitable. It is a very silly and stupid business 
 to talk of the moral in a poem, unless it be a 
 fable. 2 A good epic, or a good tragedy, or a good 
 comedy, will inculcate many morals ; but if any 
 poem should rest on one only, it would soon 
 become tedious and insufferable. 
 
 1 Lucretius, iii. 18. The lines are not quite accurately quoted. See 
 also Landor's Works, iv. 95. 
 
 2 Ov\vpn6v8', odi (fracrl 0fS>v ?8os d<r(f)a\(s aid 
 ffj.fj.fvai' OVT artpouri Tivdcr(TfTai ovre TTOT 5fj.8pca 
 Several ovre ^iwi* eV^r/Xi/arai, dXXa /idX' aWpr) 
 TreVrarat aW^eXoy, XeuKij 8* fnt8(dpofj,ev aiy\rj' 
 
 HOMER, Odyssey, vi. 42. 
 
 In the Imaginary Conversations Landor makes Xerxes say : " The 
 same singer who celebrated the valour of Achilles hath described in 
 another poem the residence of these gods ; where they lead quiet lives 
 above the winds and tempests ; where frost never binds the pure 
 illimitable expanse ; where snow never whirls around ; where lightning 
 never quivers ; but temperate warmth and clearest light are evermore 
 around them." Works, ii. 54. Dr. Jortin, quoting the verses from 
 Lucretius, wrote : " If any one thinks that Lucretius ought not to be 
 placed so near to Virgil, let him try whether he can find better lines in 
 Virgil than these." Tracts, Philological and Critical, by the late Rev. 
 John Jortin, D.D., Archdeacon of London, 1790, ii. 457. 
 
 1 Much of this and the next two paragraphs was afterwards incor- 
 porated in the Imaginary Conversation between Southey and Laudor. 
 Works, iv. 434.
 
 134 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 Homer does not represent the anger of Achilles 
 as fatal or disastrous to that hero ; this would be 
 poetical justice ; but he shows the evil effects of 
 tyranny in alienating a great and elevated soul 
 from the common cause of his friends and country. 
 In the Odyssea he shows that every thing yields 
 to constancy and perseverance, but he does not 
 propose to show it, and there are other morals not 
 less obvious. Why should the whole machinery 
 of the largest poem be brought out to establish a 
 truth, which a single verse would inculcate more 
 plainly and more memorably? In epic and 
 dramatic poetry, it is action and not moral that 
 is most regarded. The feelings and exploits of 
 the principal hero should excite the principal 
 interest. The two greatest of human works are 
 here defective. 1 Agamemnon is leader of the 
 Greeks in the expedition against Troy, to avenge 
 the cause of his brother Menelaus. Yet not only 
 Achilles, but Hector and Sarpedon, and Paris 
 himself, engage our affections much more than 
 Agamemnon. In the Paradise Lost no principal 
 character seems to have been intended. There is 
 neither truth nor wit, however, in saying that 
 Satan is hero of the piece. It is Adam who acts 
 and suffers the most, and on whom the result and 
 consequences have most influence ; this constitutes 
 him the main character, although Eve is the more 
 
 " I mean the Iliad and Paradise Lost." LANDOR, Works, iv. 434.
 
 INCOMPARABLE HOMER 135 
 
 interesting, Satan the more energetic, and on 
 whom perhaps the greater force of poetry is dis- 
 played. The Creator and His angels are all 
 secondary characters. 
 
 Must we not confess that every great poem 
 hitherto has been defective in plan, and even that 
 each has been more so than its predecessor ? Such 
 stupendous genius, so much fancy, and so much 
 vigour of intellect, never were united as in 
 Paradise Lost; yet it is neither so correct nor so 
 varied as the Iliad, nor, however important the 
 moral, so interesting or so attractive. The very 
 moral itself is the reason why it wearies even those 
 critics who insist on the necessity of it, and its 
 importance is the reason why it is so perpetually 
 urged and inculcated. It is founded on an event 
 believed by nearly all nations, certainly by all who 
 read the poem ; it lays down a principle which 
 concerns every man's welfare, and a fact which 
 every man's experience confirms : that infinite 
 misery may arise from apparently small offences. 
 But will any one say that, in a poetical view, our 
 certainty of moral truth, in this position, is an 
 equivalent for the general uncertainty which is the 
 leading character, the hero of the piece? 
 
 In proportions, in characters, in interest, in 
 action, Homer is incomparable ! It appears as if 
 no epic poet knew or thought any thing about 
 proportion. Nothing can be more gibbous than
 
 136 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 the JEneid ; it is, without exception, the most dis- 
 proportioned poem in existence. 1 In others we 
 are liable to be impatient of the episodes ; here 
 we are impatient of nearly all the rest. But the 
 exquisite versification, the tenderness of sentiment, 
 and the little descriptive scenes, produce through- 
 out an unreluctant delay. There is somewhat of 
 mild attachment to the poet in the midst of our 
 aversion for his hero : and we love him the more 
 the oftener we say we never can forgive him. 
 
 Had Virgil lived to finish the ^Eneid, still its 
 radical fault could not have been corrected. The 
 episodes are the best and principal part. This is 
 so great an absurdity as to appear a contradiction. 
 No proportions are observed ; the hero's narrative 
 is more important, and even more poetical, than 
 the poet's ; yet the effect is not dramatic. There is 
 more variety in Homer, and more order. Achilles 
 is an imperfect but attractive character. Such are 
 most proper for poetry. It abhors whatever is 
 measured, or uses such things merely for its 
 vehicles. Cato was consistent, and Lucan was 
 not without some powers, yet the Pharsalia is an 
 intolerable burden. I say nothing of Addison's 
 tragedy. His genius would not support him even 
 in a farce. He failed in whatever bore an affinity 
 to poetry. 
 
 1 " The jEneid, I venture to affirm, is the most misshapen of epics, 
 an epic of episodes : for these constitute the greater and better part." 
 LANDOR, Works, iv. 105.
 
 ELEMENTS OF THE SUBLIME 137 
 
 Inequality of character is necessary to the sub- 
 lime : in no period will that of Washington be 
 so dramatic as that of M. Antony. Take away 
 the inequalities of the Alps, and where is their 
 sublimity? 1 Steadiness and uniformity are those 
 qualities by which a man comes nearer to the 
 image of his Creator, but we desire to see repre- 
 sented to us men who partake in our imperfections 
 and infirmities. The greater they are in other 
 respects, the more pleased are we ; because, while 
 we find that we resemble them in the little, we 
 flatter ourselves that we may resemble them in 
 the great. ^Eneas was a Roman of Virgil's own 
 age. He was little better than Augustus. No 
 people was ever so far removed from all our ideas 
 of what is romantic as the Roman. Strange 
 circumstances, and foreign climates, nurturing and 
 forcing a peculiarity of growth, have sometimes, 
 but not often, taken off a little from the squareness 
 of their character. In M. Antony the scene and 
 circumstances were romantic. Sudden and violent 
 vicissitudes of fortune, and the predominancy of 
 those passions to which in some degree every one 
 is subject, and the excesses of which almost every 
 one pardons, are the very things which a poet, if 
 he cannot find, will feign. Sertorius, too, is con- 
 templated in a country not less abounding in fable 
 
 1 " Level the Alps one with another, and where is their sublimity ? " 
 LANDOH, Works, iv. 91. 
 
 18
 
 138 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 and romance than the garden of the Hesperides. 
 Pelayo, Ruy Diaz, Cortes, have inspired genuine 
 poetry ' ; and it will require but little time to 
 remove whatever is common to others from 
 Palafox, the hero of Zaragoza. Even now he 
 appears far above them, and is surrounded, if I 
 may use the expression, by a luminous atmosphere 
 of his own. The bigots of faction have asked 
 indeed what he contended for, and whether it were 
 not for arbitrary power. He who conferred by 
 his own authority the distinctions he thought 
 proper, for services which he himself could best 
 appreciate, was somewhat more than a partizan of 
 a family. He could not but know that the poorest 
 and most indigent defender of Zaragoza was more 
 worthy of power and honour than a Charles or a 
 Ferdinand. 2 But after all, wide is the difference 
 between voluntary obedience to a legitimate and 
 hereditary king, and cowardly submission to a 
 vulgar and impudent intruder. Sentiments may 
 not be founded on reason, and yet may be both 
 amiable and grand ; founded on honour they 
 must be, to be either. A want of this disgusts 
 us in ^Eneas ; and those who praise Virgil for 
 his judgment, praise him for that very quality in 
 which he is more conspicuously than in any other 
 the inferior of Homer. 
 
 1 By Robert Southey. 
 
 * Charles IV. of Spain abdicated in March, 1806, in favour of his son, 
 Ferdinand VII.
 
 PATHOS OF VIRGIL 139 
 
 [Page 89. " At Antwerp we finished the eighth 
 book of the ^Eneid. Of all the passages relating 
 to Evander and his son, Mr. Fox was very fond." 
 
 Page 91. "The tenderness of Mr. Fox's heart 
 manifested itself by his always dwelling, in poetry, 
 upon domestic and affecting traits of character, 
 when happily pourtrayed by the author." 
 
 Page 92. " This classical taste and fondness for 
 the tender parts of the ^Eneid endured to the 
 closing moments of Mr. Fox's life."] 
 
 Mr. Fox with great reason admired those pas- 
 sages most which are most pathetic. In this 
 and in the harmony of his verse, Virgil is, and 
 will for ever be, unrivalled. To blame him or 
 any other poet for his political opinions is absurd, 
 unless those opinions take an undue share in his 
 compositions. Then they are subject to the same 
 censure as any thing else would be, doing the 
 same. An honourable mind will pay nearly an 
 equal tribute of admiration and applause to Sir 
 Philip Sidney and to Algernon. My heart is as 
 much with the one as with the other; my reason 
 not. It appears to me, however, that the senti- 
 ments of Virgil were greatly more in favour of 
 Julius and Augustus than of the old government, 
 and I blame neither his heart nor his understand- 
 ing. Pompey, and such venal men as the senate, 
 were utterly unfit to govern. It is childish to 
 blame an usurper ; those only are to be blamed
 
 140 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 who render it desirable or tolerable that any should 
 exist. Cromwell and William III. were requisite 
 to England, and France without a Bonaparte 
 would have been desolate and undone. Usurpers 
 retard the extinction of nations by the very 
 animosities they excite ; demagogues and political 
 adventurers tend to hasten it, by the indifference 
 they produce in consequence of their declamatory 
 falsehoods and unstable conduct. The republic 
 of Rome, with a Pompey or a Crassus at the 
 head, would have been soon dismembered. Julius 
 and his fortunate successor knew where to select 
 such officers, both in war and peace, as give 
 stability to power and constancy to fortune. It 
 is grievous to recollect how many good and 
 patriotic men suffered, and hardly less so to 
 consider how many servile and corrupt escaped. 
 
 {Page 150. " At Brussels, having finished the 
 jEneid, our readings in Latin ceased." 
 
 Pages 155-7. " Here we heard of Monsieur 
 Chauvelin, who was said to live a retired life in 
 Burgundy. The remembrance of this gentleman, 
 in 1802, 1 brought with it many important con- 
 siderations. Had Lord Grenville possessed the 
 conciliating manners and enlarged views of Mr. 
 
 1 Trotter means the remembrance, in 1802, of what took place 
 between the Marquis de Chauvelin and Lord Grenville in 1793. On 
 January 24, 1793, three days after the execution of Louis XVI., 
 Grenville, Pitt's Foreign Secretary, notified to Chauvelin that his 
 functions as ambassador, suspended for some time past, were now 
 terminated, and that he must leave the country within eight days.
 
 LORD GRENVILLE'S MANNERS 141 
 
 Fox ; had the minister for foreign affairs in 
 England, or the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, 
 who was minister for all affairs, been capable of 
 rationally weighing the events of futurity with 
 intuitive judgment, and of viewing, with the 
 benignant eyes of a true statesman, the effer- 
 vescence and agitations of a long-oppressed nation ; 
 nay, had the ministers of the day, in 1793, pos- 
 sessed the hearts of Englishmen of the old school, 
 they would have venerated the struggle for liberty, 
 made by a sister nation, which had been long 
 ridiculed and despised for its subservience to a 
 grand monarque, and they would respectfully have 
 said, every nation is free at all times to choose her 
 own government. . . . Had such been Lord Gren- 
 ville's language, on the momentous day when he 
 ignominiously dismissed M. Chauvelin, what seas 
 of blood would have been spared to France and all 
 Europe ! "] 
 
 Page 156. " Had Lord Grenville possessed 
 the conciliating manners and enlarged views of 
 Mr. Fox," etc. 
 
 The sole views of Lord Grenville and his family 
 have been to amass large fortunes. No means, 
 public or private, have been neglected by them. 
 Hence it is that these new people overtop all, 
 or nearly all, the ancient nobility of the kingdom. 
 Having said thus much, I shall not be accused of 
 flattery if I deliver it as my opinion that he is 
 a much wiser man than Mr. Pitt or Mr. Fox. 
 However proud and arrogant, he is not reluctant
 
 142 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 to change a wrong notion for a right one. He 
 is more calm than Mr. Pitt, more consistent 
 than Mr. Fox. He has no unworthy favourites, 
 in public life or private. His eloquence is never 
 captivating, but always manly. He neither drags 
 along the bottom the involved toils of Fox, nor 
 allures with the false lights of Pitt. The propriety 
 of his conduct towards the ambassador of France, 
 and the policy of entering into a war with the 
 republic, have been more than enough discussed. 
 Burke, the only member of Parliament whose 
 views were extensive, and whose reading was 
 all turned to practical account, was more violent 
 than even Lord Grenville for a declaration of 
 hostilities. His unrivalled eloquence was fatal to 
 our glory ; it silenced our renown for justice and 
 for wisdom, undermined our internal prosperity, 
 and invaded our domestic peace. He was equally 
 clear and magnificent in the development and 
 display of his grand principles, but he hurried 
 through passages which he never had explored, 
 and the phantom he was pursuing struck the 
 lamp out of his hand. 
 
 [Page 160. "We left Brussels on the 17th of 
 August, and found the day extremely hot ; we 
 recurred again to Tom Jones, and forgot the little 
 inconveniences of the journey. We were now 
 drawing to the end of our tour, and had been 
 much indebted to the genius of Fielding for 
 amusement and instruction."]
 
 THE ARABIAN NIGHTS 143 
 
 Page 161. "[Tom Jones is also, with all his 
 indiscretions on his head, far preferable to those 
 much more dangerous personages in modern novels, 
 whose voluptuous authors seem to conceive that 
 libertine immorality, clothed in eloquent language, 
 are sure to gain approbation and support. Mr. Fox 
 was fond of novels, but not of the latter class. 
 Their verbiage, and want of fidelity to nature, were 
 sure to disgust him. I have read to him, at times, 
 a great many, but none of this description.] In 
 The Arabian Nights' Entertainments he delighted 
 much." 1 
 
 I have always had a strong and irresistible 
 curiosity to discover what opinions were enter- 
 tained on the first appearance of works which 
 afterwards acquired the greatest celebrity, and 
 have generally found that this celebrity has been 
 of gradual and slow growth. In the correspon- 
 dence of Swift and Pope, The Arabian Nights 
 are mentioned with contempt. 2 Gray speaks in 
 like manner of Rousseau's Heloise? These works 
 
 1 "And who would not?" Trotter asks. Landor certainly did. 
 Writing to Lady Blessington on January 13, 1835, he said : " The 
 Arabian Nights have lost none of their charms for me. All the learned 
 and wiseacres in England cried out against this wonderful work, upon 
 its first appearance ; Gray among the rest. Yet I doubt whether any 
 man, except Shakespeare, has afforded so much delight, if we open our 
 hearts to receive it. The author of The Arabian Nights was the greatest 
 benefactor the East ever had, not excepting Mahomet." MADDEN'S 
 Lady Blessington, ii. 380. 
 
 1 " And now, sir," Bishop Atterbury wrote to Pope, in 1720, " for 
 your Arabian tales. Ill as I have been almost ever since they came 
 to hand, I have read as much of them as I ever shall read while I live. 
 Indeed, they do not please my taste." 
 
 8 Writing to Dr. Wharton, in 1761, Gray said : " The Nouvelle 
 Heloise cruelly disappointed me."
 
 144 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 are perhaps read with more universal delight than 
 any others, ancient or modern. Gray himself, and 
 Cowper, the two most popular of our poets, have 
 received abundance both of invective and advice 
 from persons whose alacrity of zeal and weight 
 of judgment are alike forgotten. It is amusing 
 to look into reviews of literature, where a series 
 can be found, and to see the remarks made at 
 the moment, on Hume, and Robertson, and 
 Goldsmith. They are treated as somewhat less 
 than equals by the lowest order of literary men, 
 and if any thing should be spoken well of, the 
 commendation is followed by hints and sugges- 
 tions ; instead of deference and homage, they 
 show encouragement, complacency, and favour. 
 
 Johnson seems to have fared better with these 
 people in his lifetime. Since his decease, those 
 whose age and poetry were equally in the sere, 
 the yellow leaf, have treated him less respectfully ; 
 1 mean a coterie in his native city, indulging that 
 sickly and nauseating petulance, which finds in 
 its ill humour a refreshment, if not a satisfaction, 
 and fancies in itself, if not all its pristine vigour, 
 yet a liveliness and spirit, when it is supported 
 by patients of the same disease. Dr. Darwin, 1 
 a man of talents and a poet, is said to have 
 countenanced this worse than folly. He was often 
 
 1 Dr. Erasmus Darwin, physician and poet (1731-1802), author of 
 The Botanic Garden, etc., and grandfather of Charles Darwin
 
 A CREDULOUS BLUE-STOCKING 145 
 
 a great latitudinarian in absurdity, but he never 
 went so far, although very good-humoured and 
 jocose, as when he told the too credulous Miss 
 Seward 1 that she had "invented an epic elegy" 
 In fact, no writer was ever less original or more 
 fantastic. Her verses are bloated with expletives, 
 and crowded with idle and incongruous images ; 
 and there is no other difference between her 
 poetry and her prose than that her prose has 
 somewhat more of stiffness and transposition to 
 punish it for its escape from rhyme ; there is 
 about as much, indeed, as between the stocks and 
 the pillory. Johnson, with a graciousness unusual 
 to him, 2 and certainly with much violence to his 
 nature, did actually conceal from her every harsher 
 feature of his proud and provoked contempt. 
 Such characters as his are to be treated with 
 respect and deference ; they can seldom gain any 
 thing else ; and surely a kind feeling is the least 
 costly offering we can make. Every man of 
 
 1 Anna Seward (1747-1809), a noted blue-stocking, wrote " Memoirs 
 of Dr. Darwin," in which she claimed to have written the first fifty 
 lines of his Botanic Garden. Landor's dislike of this lady is referred 
 to in Forster's biography, i. 111. According to Landor, the feud began 
 when his remark that he preferred a pretty woman to a literary one 
 came to her ears, and it grew acute when she declared that nobody 
 but the author of Gebir could have written the review of that poem in 
 The Critical Review. 
 
 2 " Madam," said Dr. Johnson, when Miss Seward mentioned to 
 him The Columbiade, an epic poem by Mme. du Boccage, " there is not 
 anything equal to your description of the sea round the North Pole, 
 in your ode on the death of Captain Cook." BOSWELL'S Johnson, Globe 
 ed., p. 653. 
 
 19
 
 146 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 genius hears them mentioned with the same 
 interest and anxiety as if they were his kindred. 
 Reviewers and magazine-men, the linkboys and 
 scavengers of literature, treat them like inferiors 
 and dependents ; and indeed no inconsiderable 
 portion of their worldly welfare is affected by the 
 representations of these men. Of late years, if 
 any one had paid any attention to such people, 
 one would imagine that Dr. Johnson was hardly 
 on a level with Dr. Drake, and that Aristotle 
 only kept a box for Mr. Fellowes. 1 
 
 This reverend gentleman having settled religion 
 to his mind, but unhappily 
 
 Castalia interdictus aqua, interdictus et igni 
 Pierio 
 
 driven out from among the poets, is retaliating 
 on them as their judge. He writes, or did write, 
 for I know not whether the work survives his 
 hand, in The Critical Review 2 ; strange successor 
 to the gentle, but high-minded Southey ! 
 
 [Page 179. " On the score of religion I perceived 
 
 1 Dr. Nathan Drake (1766-1836), literary essayist and physician, 
 published in 1805 Essays illustrative of the Tatler, Spectator, and Guardian ; 
 and, in 1810, The Gleaner : a series of periodical essays. His work on 
 Shakespeare and his Times appeared in 1817 (Dictionary of National 
 Biography). Dr. Robert Fellowes (1771-1847), edited The Critical 
 Review from 1804 to 1811. He was an intimate friend of Dr. Parr, 
 and one of the promoters of the London University. 
 
 2 "The little man who followed you [Southey] in The Critical Review, 
 poor Robin Fellowes, whose pretensions widen every smile his im- 
 becility has created." LANDOB, Imaginary Conversations (1824), i. 40. 
 The passage is slightly altered in Works, 1876, iv. 22.
 
 MR. FOX'S RELIGION 147 
 
 that he (Fox) did not merely tolerate, for that 
 word ill applied to his disposition on sacred matters, 
 but was truly benignant. . . . There never escaped 
 from his lips one disrespectful word regarding 
 religion ; never one doubtful smile was seen on 
 his countenance in a place of worship, or the 
 slightest derogation from a solemn and respectful 
 regard for all around him." *] 
 
 I have nothing to say on any man's religion ; 
 and indeed where a man is malignant in his words 
 or actions, his creed is unimportant to others, and 
 unavailing to himself. But I grieve whenever a 
 kind heart loses any portion of its comforts, and 
 Dr. Parr, 2 I am certain, felt the deepest sorrow 
 that Mr. Fox wanted any which Christianity could 
 give. Whether in the established church the last 
 consolations of religion are quite so impressive 
 and efficacious ; whether they always are adminis- 
 tered with the same earnestness and tenderness, as 
 
 1 This is no doubt the passage in Trotter's book that suggested the 
 following paragraph, which, however, appears to have been misplaced. 
 
 * " I have often remarked," Dr. Parr wrote, "that upon religious 
 subjects he did not talk irreverently, and generally appeared unwilling 
 to talk at all before strangers or friends. . . . Yet, from conversations 
 which have incidentally passed between him and myself, I am induced 
 to think that, according to the views he had taken of Christianity, he 
 did not find any decisive evidence for several doctrines which many 
 of the wisest among the sons of men have believed with the utmost 
 sincerity and defended with the most powerful aids of criticism, history, 
 and philosophy. But he occasionally professed, and from his known 
 veracity we may be sure that he inwardly felt, the highest approbation 
 of its pure and benevolent precepts." Characters of C. J. Fox, i. 220. 
 Trotter, describing the scene at Fox's death-bed, says : " Mr. Bouverie, 
 a young clergyman then in the house, was brought in. Prayers were 
 read. Mr. Fox was quiet and resigned, but evidently disliked 
 speaking." Memoirs, p. 463.
 
 148 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 the parent church administers them, is a question 
 which I should deem it irreverend to discuss. 
 Certainly, he is happiest in his death, whose 
 fortitude is most confiding and most peaceful ; 
 whose composure rests not merely on the suppres- 
 sion of doubts and fears ; whose pillow is raised 
 up, whose bosom is lightened, whose mortality 
 is loosened from him, by an assemblage of all 
 consolatory hopes, indescribable, indistinguishable, 
 indefinite, yet surer than ever were the senses. 
 
 Page 170. "[I must not omit to mention 
 another book I read a little on the road, and at 
 Brussels. I allude to the Orlando Furioso of 
 Ariosto. Of this work Mr. Fox was excessively 
 fond ; and as I agreed with him in this partiality, 
 the reading some stanzas, and conversing on the 
 beauties of this delightful book, was another source 
 of gratification not to be unnoticed in giving a 
 sketch of our short tour.] Mr. Fox held Ariosto 
 very high, thinking him equal in some respects to 
 Virgil, and even his greatest of favourites, Homer." 
 
 Mr. Fox, in another place, 1 mentions Homer 
 and Ariosto for " their wonderful facility and the 
 apparent absence of all study in their expression, 
 which," he says, "is almost peculiar to them." 
 How that can be apparent which is absent I leave 
 to the second-sighted, but I must remark that in 
 
 1 In a letter to Trotter quoted on p. 143 of the Memoirs, Mr. Fox 
 said: "Homer and Ariosto have always been my favourites : there is 
 something so delightful in their wonderful facility, and the apparent 
 absence of all study in their expression, which is almost peculiar to 
 them."
 
 HOMER AND SHAKESPEARE 149 
 
 poetry there are two kinds of facility, and opposite 
 in their nature ; one arises from vigour, the other 
 from negligence. In Homer and Shakespeare we 
 shall invariably find the best parts remarkable for 
 a facility of expression. As the purest and noblest 
 of the metals is also the most plastic, in like 
 manner whatever is in poetry the noblest and the 
 purest takes a "form and pressure" the most 
 easily and perfectly. 
 
 Ariosto and Ovid are negligent ; both are 
 amiable, both are ingenious, both are good poets, 
 but neither of them can aspire to the highest 
 rank, or to any comparison with Homer. It 
 appears rather strange that Mr. Fox should not 
 have perceived this easiness in Ovid, and in 
 Hesiod. The latter is a very indifferent poet, but 
 he enjoys no inconsiderable reputation. His verse 
 is the most fluent of all, yet his sentences are 
 seldom harmonious. We read that he contended 
 with Homer, and gained the prize. If they 
 contended, this is not unlikely to have happened ; 
 for the second best has always more favourers 
 than the best. 
 
 To write a description of a shield 1 is an idle 
 labour, in which the imitators, and perhaps the 
 
 1 Writing to Trotter from St. Anne's Hill, Mr. Fox said : " In 
 Hesiod . . . there is much that is tiresome. Perhaps the work which 
 is most generally considered as not his, I mean the 'A&nls, is the one 
 that has most poetry in it. It is very good, and to say that it is 
 inferior to Homer's and Virgil's shields, is not saying much against it." 
 
 Memoir*, p. 495
 
 150 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 predecessors of Homer, tried their skill. That of 
 Achilles, in the Iliad, 1 being so admired, is a proof 
 how much more conspicuous, and indeed attrac- 
 tive to the generality, are the blemishes and 
 excrescences of a poem, than its action and 
 symmetry. Poetry was more generally attended 
 to in the age of Homer than in ours, and many 
 would be anxious to know, exactly and minutely, 
 what armour a goddess had bestowed on her son, 
 since by that very armour he had reflected on their 
 country the highest splendour of her military 
 glory ; so that a description of it, although no 
 ornament to the Iliad, might be considered as 
 hardly a redundancy or a fault. Pope and others 
 borrowed their admiration of it, without possessing 
 or knowing where were deposited the title-deeds 
 on which it was founded. But it is better to be 
 blinded a good deal by veneration than ever so 
 little by jealousy. 
 
 But in the passage I have quoted there is surely 
 a piece of pleasantry. Mr. Charles Fox, member 
 of parliament for Westminster, and for several 
 weeks, I believe I might venture to say months, 
 one of the king's ministers, was pleased to enter- 
 tain a high opinion of Ariosto, countenanced him 
 as a person of real facetiousness, and admitted him 
 occasionally into an equal share of favour with his 
 greatest of favourites, Homer ! 
 
 1 IKad, xviii. 474.
 
 ARIOSTO AND TASSO 151 
 
 Ariosto is almost as far below Homer as he is 
 above Spenser. 1 He may be ranked among the 
 first writers of romance. His versification is very 
 easy, but also very negligent. He bears no re- 
 semblance whatsoever to Virgil or to Homer, and 
 comes nearer to Ovid than to any other of the 
 ancients. But, although the language of Ovid is 
 sometimes too familiar, it hardly ever is prosaic. 
 There is always a something, however little it may 
 be, which gives it the character of poetry. In 
 Ariosto there are at least a thousand verses which 
 have nothing to distinguish them from prose, 
 except the corresponding rhyme ; perhaps if I said 
 three thousand I should not exceed the truth. 
 The description of the palace of Atlantes 2 is a 
 wonderful type of the French revolution. Could 
 this possibly have escaped Mr. Fox ? 
 
 There is in Italian poetry another passage so very 
 curious and remarkable, so exact and complete a 
 prophecy of the same event, that I cannot help in- 
 serting it, however much I would avoid quotations : 
 
 La Francia, adorna or da natura e d'arte 
 Squallida allor vedrassi in manto negro ; 
 Ne d'empio oltraggio inviolata parte, 
 Ne loco del furor rimaso integro : 
 
 1 Mr. Fox had written to Trotter: "I am quite pleased at your 
 liking Ariosto so much ; though indeed I foresaw you would, from the 
 great delight you expressed at Spenser, who is certainly inferior to 
 him, though very excellent too. Tasso I think below both of them." 
 Memoirs, 496. 
 
 1 Ariosto, Orlando Furioso, iv.
 
 152 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 Vedova la Corona ; afflitte e sparte 
 
 Le sue fortune; e '1 Regno oppresso ed egro 
 
 E di Stirpe real percosso e tronco 
 
 II piu bel ramo ; e fulminate 11 tronco. 
 
 Gierus., lib. 20. 1 
 
 There is a splendid confusion in Ariosto, which 
 makes his imagination seem richer and more 
 extensive than it is. It certainly is not more 
 vigorous nor more various than Boccaccio's, to 
 whom he is inferior both in the humorous and 
 the pathetic. I cannot but think him somewhat, 
 though little inferior to Ovid. The latter has not 
 only more of the true epic, but an equal share of 
 that which Ariosto most excelled in variety of 
 subject and exuberance of fancy. His epistles 
 abound in touches of nature, equally pure, dis- 
 criminating, and true, and what they have been 
 most condemned for, but which is among their 
 highest merits, that sophistry of argument which 
 follows inventive love, excusing its errors and 
 exasperating its grief. In these, however, there are 
 two verses which ought rather to have come into 
 the mind of Ariosto than of Ovid : 
 
 Sic ubi fata vocant udis abjectus in herbis 
 Ad vada Maeandri concinit albus olor. 2 
 
 1 The reference should be to Tasso's Gerusalemme Conqulstata, xx. 
 
 2 Ovid, Heroics, vii. 1. " As if the Fates/' Landor writes in another 
 place, " were busied in 'calling white swans !' Ovid never composed 
 any such trash." Works, viii. 412. In a note, not reprinted, in the 
 first edition of the Imaginary Conversations, he remarks that many 
 modern critics believe the two lines to be spurious, and that some 
 manuscripts are without them (Imag. Conv., 1829, iv. 264)
 
 VIRGIL'S MELANCHOLY 153 
 
 The epistle of Dido to ^Eneas, which was 
 perhaps a school exercise, and is certainly the 
 worst poem attributed to Ovid, begins with this 
 simily ; l a most contemptible one indeed. Even 
 such prose as 
 
 Lungo sara che d'Alda di Sansogna 
 Narri, o della contessa di Celano, 
 O di Bianca Maria di Catalogna, 
 O della figlia del re Siciliano, 
 O della bella Lippa di Bologna, 2 etc. 
 
 is rather more tolerable. This is utterly unneces- 
 sary, but the other is violently misplaced. Poetry 
 has lost by similies more than it has gained. 
 Where we find one apposite, we find several that 
 tend rather to divert our attention from the object 
 they mean to illustrate : if they are bad, they must 
 fall short of it ; if good, they may go beyond it. 
 
 No two poets who have written on the exploits 
 of heroes, are so totally and universally different as 
 Virgil and Ariosto. If there is a general air of 
 melancholy pervading the poetry of Virgil, there 
 is, on the contrary, a levity and playfulness of 
 expression even in the most solemn and pathetic 
 passages of Ariosto : 
 
 Sospirando piangea, tal che un ruscello 
 Parean le guancie, e '1 petto un Mongibello. 3 
 
 1 Landor's spelling. See the Letter to an Author, appended to the 
 first edition of Pericles and Aspasia, ii. 333 : " Is it not odious to use 
 latin words anywhere for English : simile for simily ? " etc. 
 
 2 Ariosto, Orlando Furioso, xiii. 73. 
 J Orlando Furioso, i. 40. 
 
 20
 
 154 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 Well might Cervantes ridicule the romance- 
 writers. But Ariosto does not always rise with 
 us into this terrific loftiness without leading us 
 back again, and setting us down nearer home. 
 For instance : 
 
 II liberal, magnanimo, sublime 
 Gran cardinal de la chiesa di Roma. 1 
 
 I hardly know any book so pleasant to read 
 in, or so tiresome to read through, as Orlando 
 Furioso of course, I except The Faery Queene. 
 I will never believe that any man has overcome 
 twelve or fifteen thousand lines of allegory, with- 
 out long intervals of respite and repose. I was 
 seventeen years in doing it, and I never did 
 any thing which I would not rather do again. 
 
 In the gloomy deserts of Dante, some scenes 
 are stupendous both from their grandeur and 
 their solitude, and lose nothing of their distinct- 
 ness by their elevation ; in Ariosto, if there are 
 a few misshapen ornaments, yet every thing around 
 them is smiling in sunshine and fertility. No man 
 ever lays his poem down without a determina- 
 tion to resume it, but he lays it down often 
 and negligently. Let him once be under the 
 guidance of Dante, and 
 
 Revocare gradum superasque evadere ad auras, 
 Hie labor, hoc opus est 2 
 
 1 Orlando Furioso, iii. 56. Written of Cardinal Ippolito di Este. 
 See Landor, Works, iv. 118. 
 
 2 Virgil, JEneid, vi. 128. Wrongly quoted.
 
 IN PRAISE OF ALFIERI 155 
 
 He is determined not to desist ; he may find 
 another passage as striking as the last ; he goes 
 on and reads through. 
 
 It is remarkable and surprising that Mr. Fox, 
 in speaking of Italian literature, never conversed 
 about Alfieri. He was incomparably the greatest 
 poet in Europe at the time of this journey, and 
 there are not in the whole compass of Italian 
 literature such exquisite specimens of poetical 
 language and vigorous versification. He approaches 
 more nearly to the manner of the ancients than 
 any modern ; never swollen like Tasso, nor prosaic 
 like Ariosto, nor puny like Metastasio. If the 
 fame of such a man cannot be expected to attain 
 its full growth in his own age, neither can we 
 find without astonishment that his productions 
 were overlooked. He was a cordial hater of the 
 French ; he despised their morals, manners, govern- 
 ment, and literature ; he detested Voltaire, whom 
 indeed he might have considered as an epitomy 
 of that people ; versatile, lively, vain, lying, shame- 
 less, unfeeling, unprincipled, and ambitious. A 
 hatred of them on these grounds, or any other, 
 might perhaps have not been countenanced by 
 the liberal spirit of Mr. Fox. 
 
 [Page 171. " I now regret that I did not take 
 the Iliad or Odyssey with me. These works Mr. 
 Fox preferred to all others of the ancient classics ; 
 and, were a choice to have been made, would have
 
 156 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 yielded all to have preserved them. His letters 
 show his strong admiration of Homer ; and my 
 readers will perceive in them, that he esteemed 
 Euripides very highly, and perhaps preferred him 
 to all dramatic writers ; yet Homer was the great 
 poet, with him, who included every beauty, and 
 had the fewest defects in his work, of any ancient 
 or modern genius."] 
 
 We are informed that he preferred Homer to 
 the other classics. It would be better if we could 
 discover in his taste something that was peculiar 
 and discriminating ; but not a single remark of that 
 kind is recorded. That he estimated Euripides 
 very highly is another piece of information. If, 
 as is added, he preferred him to all dramatic 
 writers, he deserves more pity than even that 
 tragedian of pity ever excited. Euripides seems 
 to have written solely for the purpose of incul- 
 cating some moral and political axioms. 1 Almost 
 every character introduces them, and in almost 
 every place. There is a regular barter of verse 
 for verse ; no credit is given, but the exchange 
 paid down instantly for the commodity. These 
 dogmas in general are miserably flat, common and 
 unimportant, totally different from the striking 
 sentences employed not sparingly by Pindar, which 
 always come recommended by some simple and 
 appropriate ornament, like images on days of 
 
 1 Much of this paragraph was afterwards incorporated in the 
 Imaginary Conversation between the Abbe Delille and Walter Landor. 
 LANDOB'S Works, iv. 122.
 
 GREEK TRAGIC WRITERS 157 
 
 festival in the temples. Virgil has interspersed 
 them in his works, perhaps with equal felicity, 
 and it is among the principal excellences of Ovid. 
 The dialogue of Euripides is in general dull and 
 heavy, the construction of his fable infirm and 
 inartificial, and if in the chorus he assumes 
 another form, and becomes the poet, he is grossly 
 at a loss to make it serve the interests of the piece. 
 Aristophanes, who ridicules him in his comedies, 
 treats him disdainfully as the competitor of 
 Sophocles, and speaks probably the sense of the 
 Athenians in the time of their finest taste for 
 literature. He was not considered by them as the 
 rival of Sophocles ; but sensible men in all ages 
 will admire him, and the more so because they 
 will fancy they discover in him more wisdom 
 than others have discovered ; for while many 
 things in his tragedies are direct and almost pro- 
 verbial, many are allusive and vague, occurring 
 in various states of mind and temperatures of 
 feeling. But there is little theatrical or dramatic 
 in his works, and his characters are more anxious 
 to show their understanding than their sufferings. 
 Euripides came farther down into common life 
 than Sophocles, and he farther than JEschylus ; 
 one would have expected the reverse. In Hecuba, 
 Talthybius calls Polyxena a calf 1 ; her mother 
 
 1 XfKTOl T 'A.^alS>V (KKptTOl VfllwitU 
 
 ocrftov ays naBt^ovrts \fpoiv 
 o- EURIP., Hecuba, 515.
 
 158 COMPANIONSHIP OF BOOKS 
 
 had called her so before, and in Alcestis, the best 
 of his works, Hercules is drunk. 1 
 
 It would, however, be unjust to deny that some- 
 times, for a page together, he is both animated 
 and pathetic, but it would be equally or more 
 so to strip the laurels from the recent tomb of 
 Alfieri, 2 to assert that he elevates the mind, or 
 softens the heart less frequently, that he has 
 displayed fewer or fainter powers of invention, 
 rendered less service to his language, or conferred 
 less glory on his country. 
 
 1 ore(/>ei fie Kpara fj.vpcrivrjs K\dois 
 
 (ifiova-' liXaKT&v. EuBip., Alcestis, 752. 
 
 1 The monument to Alfieri; by Canova, erected at the expense of the 
 Countess of Albany, is in the church of Santa Croce, Florence. Landor 
 said of it : ' ' His monument is unworthy of Canova's hand. It exhibits 
 a small portrait of the poet in basso relievo. Little is said of him, much 
 of the Countess." Letters of Landor (1897), p. 44. Landor once met 
 Alfieri, in a London bookshop, and spoke to him enthusiastically about 
 the French revolution. " Sir," said Alfieri, ' ' you are a very young 
 man. You are yet to learn that nothing good ever came out of France, 
 or ever will." FOBSTEB'S Landor, ii. 68.
 
 CHAPTER IX 
 
 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 Hotel de Richelieu English nobility abroad French marquises 
 English county gentry Bonaparte and La Fayette Moreau and 
 Joubert Pitt and France The drain of gold Meeting with Lord 
 Holland The Theatre franfais Racine Pictures at the Louvre 
 Poussin Fine arts in England National gallery needed English 
 landscape painters Gainsborough, Turner, and the Barkers 
 Climate and pictures Rubens Versailles Louis XIV. Fox no 
 musician Metastasio and Pindar Meeting with Kosciusco The 
 Tuilleries. 
 
 {Page 184. " It was not, however, without 
 painful imaginations, that one approached the city 
 of Paris. The recollection of the multitude of 
 lives immolated upon the shrine of sanguinary 
 ambition was almost appalling." 
 
 Page 188. "Entering one of the Fauxbourgs, 
 we passed through the triumphal arch erected, I 
 think, for Louis the 14th, and shortly found our- 
 selves at the Hotel de Richelieu, which had been 
 engaged for Mr. Fox."] 
 
 Pages 190-191. "[Two or three of Mr. Fox's 
 friends came to see him on the evening of his 
 arrival : and in seeing this great man happy, and 
 among his dear English friends and companions, 
 the mournful impressions I had received upon 
 entering the Hotel de Richelieu, wore away. . . . 
 Amidst all the ease of polished society, the in- 
 
 159
 
 160 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 dependence of the Englishmen was perceptible on 
 all sides. . . .] There is a noble air of liberty 
 amongst the nobility and higher classes of English- 
 men, which added to their other accomplishments, 
 makes them appear the most respectable of their 
 class in Europe." 
 
 The nobility of other countries is divided into 
 two parts. For instance, the grandees of Spain 
 are not merely the peers of Condes, etc. A certain 
 landed property is requisite, which is unalienable, 
 and must consist of many thousands a year. There 
 were in Paris before the revolution several 
 marquises who had not an income of two hundred 
 a year each ; some lived as common gamblers and 
 sharpers, and exercised their talents in this country 
 afterwards. All those gentlemen of England J 
 who have inherited from their ancestors for three 
 or four centuries large estates would be classed 
 among the nobility hi the other kingdoms of 
 Europe, and many of their families had once the 
 rank of baron in their own. When Mr. Pitt was 
 innovating, in his regular government as he called 
 it, more than Marius presumed to do when he 
 had trampled on the necks of the Romans, the 
 
 1 In the Imaginary Conversations Landor makes Alfieri say : " The 
 greater part of the English nobility has neither power nor title. Even 
 those who are noble by right of possession, the hereditary lords of 
 manors with large estates attached to them, claim no titles at home or 
 abroad. Hence in all foreign countries the English gentleman is placed 
 below his rank, which naturally and necessarily is far higher than that 
 of your slipshod counts and lottery-office marquises." Works, iv. 267.
 
 OUR LANDED ARISTOCRACY 161 
 
 few country-gentlemen remaining might have 
 formed themselves into a separate class, and 
 constituted a nobility more respectable and more 
 powerful than his. Lords of two or three manors, 
 heirs of three or four thousand a year for three 
 or four generations, might have established to 
 themselves that rank in the country which their 
 families once possessed. They lost it by not being 
 called to parliament at the beck of an arbitrary 
 king, who conferred new possessions and privileges 
 on such as were more subservient to his will. 
 When republicanism was making such alarming 
 strides as he represented, why did not the anti- 
 phlogistic philosophers who sat shivering on their 
 seats in the house of commons, take out of his 
 hands those instruments of which he knew not 
 the use and application ; why did not the country 
 gentlemen of England erect a barrier of property 
 on a broad basis, against the flood-tide which he 
 foretold would ruin their estates, and re-establish 
 old usages in opposition to new opinions ? 
 
 Page 193. " [The various points of attraction 
 in Paris irresistibly drew the mind in different 
 directions. The new government, just rendered 
 permanent and hereditary in Bonaparte, was pre- 
 senting itself to the public eye. Under it, the 
 stern republican and angry royalist were ranging 
 themselves, unable to struggle against an order of 
 things, emerging from that chaos of conflicting 
 interests, which until now had agitated the interior 
 
 21
 
 162 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 of France. The imposing character of Bonaparte, 
 a warrior and a statesman of no common note, had 
 acquired an ascendancy which he was admirably 
 qualified to maintain.] You endeavoured, said he, 
 to M. La Fayette, 1 on his thanking him for his 
 liberation from the dungeons of Germany, to 
 establish the solecism of a monarch at the head of 
 a republic." 
 
 Bonaparte was in the habit of saying to those 
 about him things which were fyutvavra crwerotcrt. 2 A 
 monarch, as we call a king, had existed in the 
 republic of Poland. 
 
 Page 195. " It was privately stated, that when 
 Bonaparte returned from Egypt, and the change 
 of government was in agitation, he] (Bonaparte), 
 Moreau, and Joubert, had been thought of as fit 
 heads for the republic." 3 
 
 Joubert lost his life in the midst of his popularity. 
 
 1 Lafayette fled from France during the Reign of Terror, and was 
 arrested and imprisoned by the Prussians. In 1795 the King of Prussia 
 handed him over to the Austrians, by whom he was kept in confinement 
 at Olmiitz. His case was the subject of a debate in the House of 
 Commons in .1796, but Fitzpatrick's proposal that England should 
 demand his release was defeated. He was liberated in August, 1797, 
 at the instance of Bonaparte. 
 
 2 Pindar, Olymp. ii. 152. The same words were inscribed on the title- 
 page of Odes by Mr. Gray, printed at Strawberry Hill, 1757. 
 
 3 Trotter proceeds : " That the latter [Joubert] had been nominated 
 by the party who conceived that a military character was requisite at 
 the head of the nation ; and that after he lost his life in battle, Moreau 
 and Bonaparte alone were those to whom the armies subsequently 
 looked up ; but the former was induced, by the latter's persuasion, to 
 yield his pretensions to him. Without vouching for this, 1 cannot 
 assent to the opinion that Bonaparte could have had any competitor of 
 a formidable nature, either upon being chosen first consul, or upon his 
 attaining the consulate for life."
 
 WHAT PITT ACCOMPLISHED 163 
 
 Moreau was thought amiable, but was always 
 called sans caractere. No man ever was so well 
 formed to govern France as Bonaparte. He had 
 associated in person with the vilest, the most 
 unprincipled, and the most turbulent. He was 
 chosen to fill his office as thief-takers are chosen 
 for theirs : from knowing the haunts and habits 
 of the abandoned and desperate. 
 
 {Page 198. " I found myself in Paris, the seat 
 of so many Bourbons, once almost adored, now 
 blotted from the calendar of Sovereigns, and a 
 new throne quietly erecting at the Tuileries ; a 
 new dynasty securely placing its feet upon the 
 steps."] 
 
 [Page 199. " Such were my thoughts, I felt 
 almost giddy at the view ; the destiny of millions 
 was arranging before my eyes ; it was quite impos- 
 sible for a number of Englishmen to meet, and to 
 forbear saying, how astonishing !] What a business 
 has been accomplished by William Pitt! [What 
 a friend has he been to the fortunes of Bonaparte !]" 
 
 Yes, yes ! without this incomparable financier, 
 France would not have found gold enough in all 
 her territories to make a crown of. This heaven- 
 born minister showered it down on her like Jupiter 
 into the lap of Danae. 
 
 Page 200. 1 "The phenomenon of abundance of 
 
 1 Trotter says (p. 199) : " Another striking 1 result, also, of the 
 Coalition War awaited us in Paris. Here all was gold and silver. In 
 London, a few guineas were with great difficulty procured from a 
 banker, as a matter of favour ; in Paris, the banker gave you your
 
 164 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 gold and silver in France, and of nothing to be 
 seen but paper in England how should I have 
 rejoiced that Mr. Pitt, accompanied by some 
 vociferating members of parliament, or interested 
 merchants, had been led to a Parisian banker's 
 desk, and interrogated on this difference." 
 
 Why ! they would have sworn it was either the 
 last night's plunder by some jacobin, or, if any 
 of Pitt's saints were among them, that it was 
 some illusion of the devil. Tell them a truth, and 
 they hate you ; prove it, and they never forgive 
 you. 
 
 [Page 201. "As Mr. Fox found himself happily 
 reunited to Lord Holland and his family, after a 
 considerable separation, we dined with them, and 
 in the evening went to the Theatre franpais. 
 Upon entering a French theatre for the first time, 
 an Englishman finds a good deal to reconcile him- 
 self to. The want of a powerful light throughout 
 the house, intended to give greater effect to the 
 stage, offends his taste at first, but he will finally 
 approve, if he be not determined to prefer all the 
 customs of England." 
 
 Page 202. "The piece we saw was Andromaque, 
 in which Mademoiselle Duchenois, as Hermione, 
 obtained and deserved great applause. The 
 French declamation is at first rather painful to an 
 English ear, and I think a less measured style, 
 
 choice silver or gold, and both were plentiful : England having nothing 
 but paper, and France nothing but gold and silver ; a fact which spoke 
 very intelligible language. How much should I have rejoiced/' etc., 
 as in Lander's quotation.
 
 VISITS TO THE THEATRE 165 
 
 and studied tone, would much improve it. The 
 unpleasantness wore quickly off, however." 
 
 Page 203. "Mr. Fox enjoyed the French 
 theatre very much ; and as Racine was his favourite 
 dramatic author, we went very shortly again to 
 see Phedra performed at the same theatre." 
 
 Page 204. " On this occasion he (Mr. Fox) was 
 very soon recognised by the audience in the pit. 
 Every eye was fixed upon him, and every tongue 
 resounded Fox ! Fox ! The whole audience stood 
 up, and the applause was universal."] 
 
 Page 202. Here are some remarks on the 
 French theatre very creditable to the taste of the 
 author. The manner of lighting it is founded, not 
 on parsimony, as some Englishmen think, but on 
 sound knowledge of effect. Every actor is equal 
 to his part ; none seems to solicit applause, every 
 one to deserve it. Human ingenuity could not 
 contrive any thing so painful to the ear as a 
 continuation of Alexandrines, a regular and rapid 
 alternation from high to low, a pause at every sixth 
 syllable ; and French tragedy labours under this 
 evil spirit, which no genius can exorcise, yet the 
 actors in some degree seduce us from our 
 sufferings. 
 
 Whoever takes the trouble of marking all idle 
 or extravagant epithets in Racine, will be sur- 
 prised at the number. A very large proportion 
 of rhymes in the language are adjectives and
 
 166 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 participles, which also in general form the cesura. 
 This is among the principal reasons why it is less 
 poetical than any other we know of, unless it be 
 the Chinese ; and if we consider that some of the 
 poets, as we find in Manage, collected the rhymes 
 first and filled them up afterwards, and that it was 
 the custom of Racine to begin with the second 
 verse throughout, we cannot wonder that nothing 
 grand, simple, or unlaboured is to be found in 
 their graver poetry. I believe I read La Fontaine 
 with as much pleasure as any Frenchman does, 
 but his merits are quite distinct from his verse. 
 Racine is a dexterous planner of dramas, but all 
 his characters are French ladies and gentlemen, 
 and all possess dispassionate judgment in the most 
 arduous affairs. The celebrated line 
 
 Je crains Dieu, etc., 
 
 is taken almost verbally from Godeau. 1 The one 
 preceding it is useless, and shows, as innumerable 
 other instances do, his custom of making the first 
 for the second. He has profited very much by 
 the neglected poets of his country, and wants 
 energy because he wants originality. 
 
 1 Soumis avec respect a sa volonte saiute 
 Je crains Dieu, cher Abner, et n'ai pas d'autre crainte." 
 
 RACINE, Athalie, Act I. Sc. 1. 
 
 Landor repeats this criticism in his Imaginary Conversation with the 
 Abbe Delille (Works, iv. 120). Joseph Warton, in his essay on Pope 
 (3rd edition, p. 91), quotes the account given by Menage, in his 
 Observations sur les poesies de Malherbe, of another theft from Antoine 
 Godeau, Bishop of Vence, the culprit in this case being Corneille.
 
 THE FRUITS OF CONQUEST 167 
 
 Page 207. " [No one could be in Paris and not 
 feel a powerful desire to view those productions of 
 art and genius, the accumulated fruits of successful 
 war. Shortly after our arrival, therefore, we 
 hastened to the museum of pictures at the 
 Louvre.] Mr. Fox smiled as he entered the 
 museum of the Louvre, and seemed plainly to say, 
 ' Here are the fruits of conquest.' ' 
 
 My own feelings, I confess, were extremely 
 different. I went, with impatient haste, to behold 
 these wonders of their age and of all ages succeed- 
 ing, but no sooner had I ascended a few steps 
 leading to them, than I leaned back involuntarily 
 against the ballusters, and my mind was over- 
 shadowed, and almost overpowered, by these 
 reflections : Has then the stupidity of men who 
 could not in the whole of their existence have 
 given birth to any thing equal to the smallest of 
 the works above, been the cause of their removal 
 from the country of those who produced them ? 
 Kings, whose fatuity would have befitted them 
 better to drive a herd of swine than to direct the 
 energies of a nation ! Well, well ! I will lose for 
 a moment the memory of their works in con- 
 templating those of greater men ! 
 
 If I envy a man any thing it is his smiles ; but 
 those of Mr. Fox I neither could envy nor share. 
 
 The long gallery of the Louvre should be 
 divided into five or six, and the light admitted 
 into each from above. It would then contain a
 
 168 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 third part more of pictures, and every one would 
 be seen to greater advantage. At present it is 
 like looking through a sheet of paper rolled up 
 into a cylinder. The French artists do not derive 
 all the advantages they might from the Italian. 
 They either copy statues, or imitate those who 
 have. Poussin is more studied than Raphael, and 
 although they know well that the perfection of 
 their art consists in the delight which arises from 
 beauty and combinations of forms, and from 
 sweetness and propriety of colours, yet we find 
 no attempt to acquire any thing from Correggio. 
 
 To the scandal and infamy of our government, 
 we have no national gallery, when a million or 
 two would have purchased some of the finest 
 specimens of all the ancient masters, both in 
 painting and in statuary, before they were irre- 
 vocably fixt in Paris, but after it was known that 
 they would otherwise be sent thither ; we have not 
 even a receptacle for the select works of our own 
 most eminent masters. With all these discourage- 
 ments, we have now living a greater variety of 
 good painters than the French have. Claude 
 Lorraine, N. Poussin, Le Brun, Vernet, and per- 
 haps as many more, have never been equalled 
 here ; but those who attribute our failure to our 
 climate talk most ignorantly. It is in landscape, 
 where climate would have most influence, that the 
 greatest number of the English school excel.
 
 SCHOOLS OF PAINTING 169 
 
 Wilson and Gainsborough were succeeded by 
 Loutherbourg and Turner, and the Barkers. 1 Of 
 these, Thomas Barker, however little patronised, 
 and still young, has produced more good pictures 
 than any native of England. Climate alone has 
 little effect on the fine arts. The most vivid and 
 powerful of colourists lived and studied among 
 damps and fogs. The Venetian school was formed 
 in a showery country, and the colours of Rubens 
 were " unborrowed of the sun." 2 The visible face 
 of nature is not that on which painters fix their 
 eyes incessantly ; memory, reflection, imagination, 
 give a play and a variety to its features ; genius 
 and judgment have the power of contemplating it, 
 abroad or at home, in whatever aspect they wish. 
 
 Page 215. " [Two days after our arrival in 
 Paris, we went to see the Palace of Versailles. . . . 
 This cumbrous pile seemed little to suit Mr. Fox's 
 taste. . . . The pride of despotism had erected a 
 mansion for its display of pomp : a galled and 
 oppressed people had paid, with the fruit of their 
 labour, for its erection.] Here their haughty kings 
 rioted Versailles and forgetting the miseries of 
 their subjects, added to them by their selfish ex- 
 travagance, and bestowed on profligate courtiers 
 
 1 "The Woodman," by Thomas Barker, of Bath (1769-1847), was 
 engraved by Bartolozzi. The brother, Benjamin Barker, died in 1838. 
 Thomas Jones Barker, son of Thomas Barker, was born in 1815 and 
 died in 1882. 
 
 3 " With orient hues unborrow'd of the sun." 
 
 GRAY, Progress of Poesy, iii. 3. 
 
 22
 
 170 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 what would have made merit happy, and caused 
 genius to expand and bloom." 
 
 Louis XIV., that great patron of literature, is 
 celebrated for giving pensions to men of genius. 
 I once took the trouble to cast up the amount 
 of several, bestowed on the ornaments of his 
 reign, and found that, collectively, they rather fell 
 short of what Cambaceres was said to give as 
 wages to his cook. 
 
 Page 228. "[Mr. Fox enjoyed the French 
 spectacle greatly, and I think he did not differ 
 much from me, when I preferred it to the English 
 stage. In one respect, however, he felt less 
 pleasure at the public amusements than others did, 
 as] music gave him no great satisfaction. [He did 
 not appear to relish it much, and he himself has 
 assured me, and his mind was free from all disguise, 
 that he derived no pleasure from it. Still this must 
 be taken in a qualified sense, even from himself.] 
 He who could so strongly taste the charms of 
 poetry, could not be destitute of a musical ear." l 
 
 This does not follow. No people are so ignorant 
 of poetry as musicians. Hardly one was ever 
 
 1 " Mr. Fox had a kind of singular taste for music ; in this alone he 
 was totally without judgment. Old tunes were such as alone pleased 
 him. He said that no opera was equal to Inkle and Yarico. Some one 
 happening to mention The Beggar's Opera, he said, ' Certainly, 1 will 
 except that. The Beggar's Opera is the wittiest drama on the stage : 
 the wit is simple, intelligible, and appeals alike to every one.' " 
 Circumstantial Details, etc., p. 41. Bishop Tomline quotes Windham's 
 remark that Pitt, Fox, Burke, and Dr. Johnson, the four greatest men 
 he had known, had no ear for music. See Lord Rosebery's article in 
 The Monthly Review, August, 1903.
 
 MUSICIANS AND DANCERS 171 
 
 found who could write it even indifferently, and 
 extremely few who could value properly even 
 the merits of versification. This appears strange ; 
 but it is more so, and equally true, that although 
 dancing requires a good ear, as many think, few 
 dancers are good musicians ; their ear is good for 
 nothing more than to note the proper time, the 
 averts and 0eans l of the feet. The Italians are the 
 most musical people in Europe, and the worst 
 dancers ; the French are the best dancers and 
 worst musicians. 
 
 Page 229. "No one felt more than Mr. Fox 
 the powers of Homer, Virgil, Pindar, Euripides, 
 Ariosto, or Metastasio." 
 
 Alas ! these are levelling days indeed ! Meta- 
 stasio in the company of Pindar and of Homer ! 
 the powers of Metastasio ! of the Abbate Meta- 
 stasio ! Aye verily, why not ? was he not poeta 
 Cesareo ? Mr. Fox did seriously think him a 
 great poet, and knew not that Alfieri was a 
 greater, or one at all ! Of Pindar he knew 
 little ; he tells us himself that he had read only 
 a part of his works. 2 There is a grandeur of 
 soul in Pindar which never leaves him, even in 
 
 1 Thesis is the ictus or beat of the foot, arsis the uplifting. The 
 meanings are sometimes confused. 
 
 3 " Pindar," Mr. Fox wrote to Trotter, " is too often obscure, and 
 sometimes more spun out and wordy than suits my taste ; but there are 
 passages in him quite divine. I have not read above half his works. " 
 Memoirs, p. 495.
 
 172 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 domestic scenes. 1 His genius does not rest on 
 points or peaks of sublimity, but pervades all 
 things with a vigorous and easy motion, such 
 as poets attribute to the messenger of the gods. 
 He is still more remarkable for his exquisite 
 taste than for his sublimity. He never says 
 more than what is proper, nor otherwise than 
 what is best ; and he appears no less the superior 
 of all other mortals in the perfection of wisdom 
 than of poetry. 
 
 [Page 229. " Eight or nine days after our arrival, 
 the door of one of the apartments of the Hotel de 
 Richelieu was thrown open, and a gentleman of 
 small stature, and with nothing prepossessing 
 in his appearance, was shown in. ... It was 
 Kosciusko ! "] 
 
 Page 231. " Mr. Fox's reception of him 
 (Kosciusko) was warm and friendly." 
 
 He and Palafox are the only two men in the 
 universe I would rise from my chair to look at. 2 
 
 Page 232. " [Kosciusko was in apparent good 
 health, though, I believe, his wounds will never 
 allow him to be perfectly well.] The interview 
 was not very long, but how different was it from 
 the meeting of potentates, prepared to deceive one 
 
 1 A portion of this paragraph is repeated in the Imaginary Conversa- 
 tion between Landor and the Abbe Delille. Works, iv. 97. 
 
 J ' ' Among all men elevated in station who have made a noise in the 
 world (admirable old expression) I never saw any in whose presence I 
 felt inferiority excepting Kosciusko." LANDOR, Works, iv. 428.
 
 VILLAINS AND PATRIOTS 173 
 
 another, or planning the disturbance of happy and 
 independent nations. Not like Joseph and the 
 remorseless Catharine." 1 
 
 Infamous prostitute and despicable villain ! 
 What reaction of the mind drives us back upon 
 you, from the sublimest and purest spectacle of 
 human virtue ! 
 
 Page 233. [" I saw Kosciusko depart with a 
 strong sentiment of profound admiration and 
 sorrow.] He (Kosciusko) was an obscure indi- 
 vidual in France, little noticed, and cast back 
 among the class of ordinary men ; not regarded 
 by a new government rising upon the ruins of 
 every thing republican, and felt himself alone 
 among the brilliant crowd of opulent and 
 thoughtless strangers." 
 
 Yet Mr. Fox was honoured in that country. 
 Were his principles, then, different from Kosciusko's, 
 and more congenial to the French ? They were. 
 
 Omnis Aristippum decuit color, et status, et res. 2 
 
 [Page 239. " I was glad to go to the palace of 
 the Tuileries with Mr. and Mrs. Fox, Mr. West, 
 and Mr. Opie. In front are still to be seen the 
 marks of cannon-ball : the memorable night of the 
 
 1 " Summer, 1780, Joseph made his famous first visit to the Czarina 
 (May-August, 1780) not yet for some years his thrice-famous second 
 visit, thrice-famous Cleopatra voyage with her down the Danube." 
 CARLYLE'S Frederick the Great. In 1780 the Emperor Joseph II. met 
 Catharine at Mohileff and went with her to St. Petersburg. The 
 second meeting took place in 1787. 
 
 3 Horace, Epist. i. 17. 23.
 
 174 MR. FOX IN PARIS 
 
 9th and 10th of August, 1792, was thus vividly 
 recalled to the memory."] 
 
 Page 240. " Could one enter this palace with- 
 out shuddering ? and could one avoid acknowledging 
 that after such and greater and continued horrors, 
 the French with some reason have naturally 
 acquiesced under a government which, though 
 falling short of their early and fond expectations, 
 affords them security against [internal commotions, 
 and protects their properties and lives against] the 
 caprice of an ignorant populace ? " 
 
 No people is so incapable of governing itself 
 as the French, and no government is so proper 
 for it as a despotic and military one. A nation 
 more restless and rapacious than any horde in 
 Tartary, can be controuled only by a Genghis 
 Khan. Such is their animal temper at this day, 
 and such was it in the time of Annibal, as 
 described by Livy. Their emperor has acted 
 towards them with perfect wisdom, and will 
 leave to some future Machiavelli, if Europe 
 should ever see again so consummate a politi- 
 cian, a name which may be added to Agathocles 
 and Cassar Borgia. 1 He has amused himself with 
 a display of every character from Masaniello 2 up 
 
 1 " Agathocles, the Sicilian, came not merely from a private station, 
 but from the very dregs of the people, to be king of Syracuse." 
 MACHIAVELLI, The Prince, chap. viii. " Cesare Borgia . . . obtained 
 a princedom through the favourable fortunes of his father, and with 
 these lost it." Ib. chap. vii. 
 
 2 Tommaso Anniello, leader of the Neapolitan revolt in July, 1647.
 
 BONAPARTE'S VAGARIES 175 
 
 to Charlemagne, but in all his pranks and vagaries 
 he has kept one foot upon Frenchmen. This is 
 a sight which those who think worth seeing might 
 have seen for nothing, had they been wise. 
 
 Page 240. " Security against internal com- 
 motions and protection of property and lives 
 against the caprice of an ignorant populace, 
 are sometimes given by despotism, and some- 
 times not. It was, however, no matter of choice 
 with the French : they were dragooned into it, 
 and applauded what they dared not resist. One 
 of the reasons why a new despotism is often 
 strong is this : many brave men are overpowered 
 by more brave men. They are ashamed of 
 acknowledging or showing that they were so, 
 and unite with those whose force they can well 
 estimate. Hence they acquire their share of 
 honours and distinctions ; and after they have 
 made others yield, it is forgotten that they 
 themselves have yielded.
 
 CHAPTER X 
 
 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 Fox at the First Consul's levee Englishmen detained in France 
 Lord Whitworth English ambassadors Lord Douglas at St. 
 Petersburg Lord Morpeth and the Queen of Prussia English 
 in Spain Blake's military operations France and Switzerland 
 Fox presented to Bonaparte Helen Maria Williams Sir Stephen 
 Fox General Moreau Monuments franfais Madame Cabarrus 
 Conversation with Bonaparte Virgil again Favourite epithets. 
 
 [Page 242. "Mr. Fox had now been twelve 
 days in Paris, and we had not seen Bonaparte, 
 except slightly and imperfectly at the theatre. 
 My own wish to behold the first Consul had not 
 been increased since my arrival. The observation 
 of military guards everywhere, the information 
 that the number of barracks in and about Paris 
 were very great, that 20,000 troops were within a 
 short summons ; and, above all, a knowledge that 
 the system of espionage was carried to an incredible 
 height, making suspicion of the slightest indispo- 
 sition to government sufficient cause for individuals 
 to be hurried away at night (many of them never 
 to be heard of again), had not contributed, by 
 any means, to exalt my opinion of the new 
 government."] 
 
 Page 243. "At this time I even doubted 
 whether an Englishman, a true lover of liberty, 
 ought to sanction the new order of things." 
 
 176
 
 AT BONAPARTE'S LEVEE 177 
 
 That is to say, at a time, as the author tells us 
 in the very sentence before, when suspicion of the 
 slightest indisposition to government was sufficient 
 cause for individuals to be hurried away at night, 
 many of them to be never heard of again. 
 
 But Mr. Fox's determination to go to the levee 
 threw a " new light " upon the secretary's mind. 
 
 [Page 243. " Mr. Fox's determination to go to 
 the approaching levee threw a new light upon my 
 mind, and I was brought to consider the case 
 dispassionately. Was an English gentleman or 
 nobleman, travelling for instruction or pleasure, 
 to be the reformer and censor of Europe ? at 
 Petersburg to reprimand Alexander, or shun his 
 ' court ? at Constantinople to insult the Grand 
 Signior, and rudely reject the society of his 
 ministers ? No ! I said to myself . . . the 
 enlightened stranger will, in all countries, respect 
 the existing government, conform to its usages and 
 ceremonies, and frequent its court as the focus of 
 all the rank, talent and character of the country."] 
 
 Any Englishman who could sanction by his 
 presence such atrocious despotism, is unworthy of 
 breathing the air of his free ancestors, and deserves 
 universal and eternal execration. He should be 
 banished, not only from the society of his country- 
 men, but from the sight of his fellow-creatures. 
 Never did I feel more cordial pleasure, never did 
 I acknowledge with more gratitude and transport 
 
 the interposition of divine justice, than when 1 
 
 23
 
 178 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 heard of such wretches being detained in France, 
 after the people of England had received the 
 grossest insult in the person of their ambassador. 1 
 Bonaparte, said I, has often been vindictive and 
 sanguinary ; let him now be both, let him punish 
 those whom the laws of England, and whom the 
 feelings of Englishmen, can never reach. Wide is 
 the difference between a respect for the usages of 
 a foreign country or a foreign court, and a volun- 
 tary homage paid to a ferocious barbarian who 
 holds all usages in contempt. An ambassador 
 goes to him by the order and for the interests of 
 his country ; private persons should look at him 
 from a distance, as at a tiger or serpent, such as 
 his native land does not produce. It was requisite, 
 was it, to frequent his court " as the focus of all 
 the rank, talent and character of the country " ? 
 An involuntary smile will rise at these expressions, 
 of which the folly and impudence are become a 
 byword in every lane and alley, and are the signal 
 for boys to hoot at whenever they meet a Foxite. 
 The rank and character, and best manners, were 
 not excluded from the Tuileries, but disdained 
 to enter. Many men of illustrious rank and 
 unostentatious honour were seen daily in the 
 
 1 The famous interview between Bonaparte and Lord Whitworth 
 took place on March 13, 1803. The First Consul raised his arm as if 
 he meant to strike the ambassador, who afterwards declared that, had 
 the blow fallen, he would have run Bonaparte through the body with 
 his sword. Lord Whitworth was the uncle of the Hon. Rose Whit- 
 worth Aylmer, the subject of Landor's elegy.
 
 AN INDOLENT AMBASSADOR 179 
 
 gardens of the Luxembourg, whose countenance 
 said, / would be grateful, but gratitude is a crime 
 under the new government; the hand of Bonaparte, 
 when Mr. Fox ceases to kiss it, may consign us to 
 the dungeon which is to be the boundary of our 
 existence. 
 
 Page 244. "[Mr. Merry, 1 the British ambas- 
 sador, was a good-natured and friendly man, but 
 unequal to trying and delicate emergencies. . . .] 
 I had subsequent reason, in Mr. Fox's ministry, to 
 observe that Mr. Pitt's long ministry had been 
 ill supplied with men of talent in foreign courts ! " 
 
 There is no nation in Europe, great or secondary, 
 which employs such improper persons in embassies. 
 Mr. Fox sent a nobleman 2 into Russia who is said 
 to have treated almost every one, native and 
 foreign, with contempt. Ignorant, indolent, and 
 dissipated, the merchants presented to him, in 
 very glowing language, a long account of their 
 grievances. They expected he would consider it, 
 look over treaties and stipulations, arid present it 
 in diplomatic terms to the emperor. Whether he 
 read it or not is uncertain, and it is difficult to 
 say on which supposition we could found his best 
 
 1 Mr. Anthony Merry was the Minister Plenipotentiary in Paris at 
 the time of Fox's visit. 
 
 * The Marquis of Douglas, afterwards Duke of Hamilton. See 
 Diaries, etc., of Sir George Jackson, March 29, 1807 : "The Emperor, 
 it seems, had taken great offence at Lord Douglas having delivered to 
 the Russian Minister, as an official note from himself, the translation 
 of a memorial he had received from the merchants at St. Petersburg, 
 which contained expressions not very flattering to the Russians " (ii. 90).
 
 180 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 defence, but he immediately delivered it, or sent 
 it to the people in power there. The emperor 
 was enraged at such language ; and a body of 
 men whom he had always protected, and whose 
 grievances, when he knew them, he would redress, 
 lost his favour and countenance for ever. 
 
 If one ambassador had the negligence or temerity 
 to deliver an instrument into the hands of an 
 emperor, rough and red-hot, another 1 was more 
 conciliating and more circumspect. When the 
 most lovely queen in the universe was overturned 
 in her carriage, on a road where the enemy was 
 pursuing her, while the cannon was heard louder 
 and louder at every discharge, he wished to know 
 whether he could lend her any assistance, and rode 
 on. He never saw the members of government, 
 never asked one question of those who came 
 forward to give him information, listened to 
 nothing, accepted no hospitality, rejected all ser- 
 vices, dismissed with impatience and rudeness 
 those who offered any, and brought back no other 
 intelligence than that Napoleon had gained a sort 
 of victory, that the roads were very sandy and 
 
 1 Viscount Morpeth, afterwards sixth Earl of Carlisle (died 1848), 
 was sent on a mission to Prussia in October, 1806. Sir George 
 Jackson wrote that, after the battle of Jena (October 14), " Morpeth 
 and his party had to run for it." " Lord Morpeth," Lady Errol wrote, 
 " is a fine person to scud, like a child, frighten'd and run away, and 
 burnt his papers, and yet can't tell anything but what he heard from a 
 few mad, cowardly runaways like himself." See Miss Festing's Frere 
 and his Friends, p. 138.
 
 DIPLOMATIC INEPTNESS 181 
 
 heavy, that persons of condition could not ride 
 along them expeditiously or comfortably ; and, by 
 way of after-thought and reminiscence, that he 
 passed the Queen of Prussia, thrown out of her 
 carriage, dead or alive he could not say positively, 
 and that the duke of Brunswick too had met with 
 an accident. It is proper to choose ambassadors 
 from men of good breeding. If they are too 
 inquisitive they may hear unpleasant things, and 
 the money they disburse for secret services may 
 be distributed among people of no rank and 
 character. I know not whether it was an ambas- 
 sador or a general who weighed a whisker against 
 a religion, and a turban against an empire ; but 
 he certainly showed a most laudable zeal for the 
 uniformity and efficacy of the service. 
 
 What information and intuition were requisite 
 for an ambassador in Spain or Sicily ! Yet we 
 still continue to pursue our former follies ; and a 
 knowledge of the people, and even of the language, 
 is considered as a matter of indifference well 
 enough, but a superfluity. Agents of every rank 
 and description were sent into Spain. Young 
 men were highly flattered by a cordial reception 
 from the members of government, who in their 
 turn were flattered just as highly by receiving 
 any thing in the form of a minister from a foreign 
 court. The res dura et regni novitas, 1 were never 
 
 1 Virgil, JRntid, i. 568.
 
 182 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 once considered on either side. It was pleasanter 
 to experience marks of attention and respect from 
 persons of rank and power, than to collect the 
 most useful pieces of information, which lay more 
 widely scattered, and were to be given by coarser 
 hands. I found a disposition in the higher orders 
 to rely too much on the English. Magazines 
 were stored up at Coruna, and other places, of 
 arms, ammunition, clothing, while the army of 
 Blake was incapable of moving from Aguilar, 
 after the battle of Medina del Rio Seco, 1 for 
 want of these very necessaries. Our communica- 
 tions should have been direct with the armies on 
 the coast, between our naval officers and their 
 military. Every movement should have been con- 
 certed and combined. Great part of our fleet, 
 lying idle before Brest, should occasionally have 
 acted as far as Bilbao. Bayonne, San Sebastian, 
 Passage, should have been blockaded ; Santona, 2 
 which was totally unfortified, without a gun, 
 
 1 The Spaniards, under Cuesta and Blake, were defeated by Marshal 
 Blessieres at Medina del Rio Seco on July 14, 1808. This opened the 
 way to Madrid, where Joseph Bonaparte arrived on July 20. Southey 
 says: "Blake was thought to have given proofs of great military talents 
 both in the action and in the retreat." Peninsular War, i. 395. A 
 month or two later Landor, with a troop of volunteer cavalry raised by 
 himself, attached himself to the Galician army. He was engaged in 
 some petty skirmishes near Aguilar, and was given the honorary rank 
 of colonel. 
 
 * On July 5, 1810, Captain F. W. Aylmer, afterwards sixth Baron 
 Aylmer, of his Majesty's ship Narcissus, landed at Santona with a force 
 of British sailors and marines and some Spanish troops, and destroyed 
 the French batteries. Captain Aylmer was a brother of the Hon. Rose 
 Aylmer, and years afterwards made Lander's acquaintance at Bath.
 
 THE PENINSULAR WAR 183 
 
 without a soldier, should have been occupied. 
 The French will make it a fortress more im- 
 portant than Gibraltar ; for it possesses all the 
 same advantages, with a haven very extensive 
 and perfectly secure, and the hills along the 
 coast, even the spot that must be fortified, are 
 covered with oaks of large growth nearly to the 
 summit. The town cannot be bombarded, nor 
 the supplies of food or water cut off. By these 
 operations, which were neglected because they 
 were easy, and because bad statesmen never 
 attempt any thing but what they cannot do, 
 the armies then pouring into Spain would have 
 been detained or checked, and our alliance would 
 have produced the best effects of co-operation. 
 
 If these things appeared at first too easy, they 
 were soon after considered in quite another point 
 of view. Petty fishing towns were objects un- 
 worthy of those commanding geniuses who preside 
 over the destiny of nations; but a great military 
 road is connected with these petty fishing towns ; 
 some hundred thousands of cannon-balls were 
 accumulated in Passage and San Sebastian ; several 
 pieces of heavy artillery were deposited there, and 
 forty or fifty ships filled with biscuit and flour ; 
 these were defended by two hundred and fifty 
 conscripts. To attack so many ships, so many 
 vast heaps of cannon-balls, and so many pieces 
 of heavy artillery, as were actually lying on the
 
 184 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 ground, and wanted nothing but carriages and 
 artillerymen, is not one of those daring actions 
 for which an English minister would choose to 
 be responsible. In the panorama which he ex- 
 hibits to the Honourable House., the petty fishing 
 town is turned suddenly into an impregnable 
 fortress. English politicians thought such things 
 impracticable, chimerical, contemptible ; Spanish 
 generals thought otherwise ; but an enemy with 
 a superiority of resources lay between. They 
 were soon persuaded, by those who could have 
 no interest in flattering and deceiving them, to 
 trust solely in their own valour and firmness ; 
 that the assistance of the English would ever be 
 ineffectual, though it might, in the beginning, be 
 sincere. Nothing was more useful and important 
 than to inculcate this truth in the right place ; 
 it was inculcated, and will bring forth its fruits 
 in due season. 
 
 [Page 254. " Shortly after our arrival in Paris, 
 distressing accounts (distressing to lovers of liberty) 
 were daily brought from Switzerland.] That coun- 
 try (Switzerland) was now suffering the horrors of 
 military oppression." 
 
 Yet Mr. Fox was paying court to that co-apostate 
 who occasioned and commanded these horrors. 
 
 [Page 256. " The aristocratical governments 
 (of Switzerland) had long disgusted and alienated 
 the people ; and the country, not feeling the same
 
 MR. FOX AT THE PALACE 185 
 
 stimulus which warmed them against Austria in 
 1300, fell an easy prey to French ambition. 
 Accordingly,] the senate of Berne in 1802 sanc- 
 tioned all the measures of Bonaparte, joined with 
 his government against the people," etc. 1 
 
 Enemies of reform, in all countries, will do the 
 same thing. They always have done it, and they 
 always will. Those who at this moment would 
 hear such a sentiment with abhorrence, and who 
 really think themselves incapable of such an action, 
 would certainly commit it. They would attribute 
 the fault to the people, to its violence, to its 
 contempt of their wisdom, and to that universal 
 disorder which never listens to any ; but, believe 
 me, they would commit it. 
 
 [Pages 258, 259." On the day of the great 
 levee . . . Lord Holland, Lord Robert Spencer, 
 Lord St. John, Mr. Adair, and myself accompanied 
 Mr. Fox. . . . Mr. Merry, the English ambassador, 
 appeared on the part of the British government, to 
 sanction and recognize the rank and government of 
 the first Consul 1 " 2 ] 
 
 Page 260. "[What a subject he (Mr. Merry) 
 had for a letter, in the style of Barillon, for the 
 perusal of Mr. Pitt, or his friend, Mr. Addington, 
 
 1 "And at length/' Trotter proceeds, "conspired with France in 
 stifling the last struggling sigh for liberty." 
 
 2 " On November 15 (1802), Gillray published a caricature entitled, 
 ' Introduction of Citizen Volpone and his Suite at Paris,' in which Fox 
 and his wife, Lord and Lady Holland, and Grey, are stooping low to 
 the new ruler of France." WRIGHT, Caricature History of the Georges, 
 p. 588. 
 
 24
 
 186 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 then acting as Pitt's deputy, or locum tenens in the 
 government ! Mr. Merry, then acting under Lord 
 Hawkesbury, the Quixotic marcher to Paris, which 
 same lord was now receiving a magnificent present 
 of a service of china of unrivalled beauty and 
 excellence, from this same new government and 
 Bonaparte.] It would have been an instructive 
 lesson to Mr. Pitt himself, could he invisibly, 
 with Minerva by his side, have contemplated the 
 scene." 
 
 He ! with Minerva by his side ! The goddess 
 would have appeared : 
 
 Ardentes oculos intorquens lumine glauco, 
 Et graviter frendens. 1 
 
 But, as for giving him an instructive lesson ! 
 the goddess of wisdom had not the attribute of 
 Omnipotence. 
 
 [Page 287. "At this time an invitation was sent 
 to Mr. Fox, from Miss Helen Maria Williams. 2 
 She requested the pleasure of his company to an 
 evening party, and, to express how much this 
 honour would gratify her, wrote that it would be 
 ' a white day ' thus distinguished. Some of Mr. 
 Fox's friends wished him to decline this invitation 
 altogether, from apprehension of giving a handle 
 to ill-nature and calumny. He, however, always 
 
 1 Virgil, Georgics, iv. 451. Wrongly quoted. 
 
 1 Author of Letters containing a Sketch of the Politics of France (1795) 
 and other works. She lived many years in France, and was described 
 by Samuel Rogers as a very fascinating person, but not handsome. 
 "1 have frequently dined with her," Rogers said, "at Paris, when 
 Kosciusko and other celebrated persons were of the party."
 
 AN ANCESTOR OF MR. FOX 187 
 
 the same, disdaining the fear of suspicion, and 
 unwilling ungraciously to refuse an invitation 
 earnestly pressed, did not agree with them, and 
 went for a short time."] 
 
 Page 288. " He was aware that he might be 
 misrepresented for going to Miss Williams's con- 
 versazione, but he was too benignant to slight with 
 contempt and scorn the request of an accomplished 
 female, whose vanity, as well as a natural admira- 
 tion of so great a man, were deeply concerned that 
 he should grant it." 
 
 Can any thing be so absurd and ridiculous as 
 to talk in this manner of Mr. Fox ? In what 
 respect was he the superior of Miss Williams ? 
 His family was base and despicable. Stephen Fox, 1 
 in the memory of persons but lately deceased, was 
 a gentleman's valet, and was brought into the 
 house of commons for administering a medicine 
 which never enters the lips, and for saying, God 
 bless you, Sir, on receiving it back in his face. 
 His master said rightly, " Stephen, you ought to 
 be at court, or in the house" 
 
 1 Sir Stephen Fox, the grandfather of Charles James Fox. " This 
 gentleman," Evelyn wrote in his Diary (September 6, 1680), ' ' came 
 first a poor boy from the quire of Salisbury, then was taken notice of 
 by Bishop Duppa, and afterwards waited on my Lord Percy, brother to 
 Algernon, Earl of Northumberland, who procur'd for him an inferior 
 place amongst the clerks of the Kitchen and Greene Cloth side, where 
 he was found so humble, diligent, industrious, and prudent in his 
 behaviour, that his Majesty, being in exile, and Mr. Fox waiting, both 
 the King and Lords about him frequently employ'd him about their 
 affairs." Lander's story will not be found either in Sir George 
 Trevelyan's Early History of Charles James Fox or in The Memoirs 
 of the Life of Sir S. Fox, Kt. (1717, reprinted 1811).
 
 188 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 The political views of Miss Williams have been 
 clear and undeviating, so as not to admit Mr. 
 Fox's to a comparison ; her imagination is more 
 vivid, her reading more extensive, her writings 
 more animated and more correct than his. I 
 never saw her, and have little esteem for her, 
 but I will do her justice. 
 
 [Page 290. "We continued busily employed 
 every morning in transcribing and reading at the 
 office of the Archives ; and as we were never inter- 
 rupted or disturbed, I was surprised one day by the 
 door opening. A stranger of an interesting and 
 graceful figure came gently in, advanced rapidly, 
 and in embracing Mr. Fox, showed a countenance 
 full of joy, while tears rolled down his cheeks. 
 Mr. Fox testified equal emotion. It was M. de la 
 Fayette, the virtuous and unshaken friend of 
 liberty ! . . . Fayette, at a very early age, had 
 visited London ; he had there become acquainted 
 with Mr. Fox, and they had not met again till 
 now." 
 
 Page 291. " M. Fayette, born under a despotic 
 regime, saw nothing in his own country to employ 
 a young and enthusiastic mind. North America 
 attracted his attention. . . . She was in the infancy 
 of her strength, when Fayette, animated with the 
 glorious cause, left all the luxuries and indulgences 
 which rank and fortune could procure him, crossed 
 the Atlantic, and offered himself to the Americans, 
 as a champion and a friend. He built, at his own 
 expense, a frigate, to aid the cause ; and, by his 
 military and civil exertions, contributed not a
 
 MADAME RECAMIER 189 
 
 little to the emancipation of the United States 
 of America ! "] 
 
 Page 292. " Whilst Fayette thus promoted the 
 cause of liberty in America, his noble friend in the 
 British house of commons laboured with equal 
 zeal to inspire an obstinate and unenlightened 
 ministry," etc. 1 
 
 And immediately after formed a coalition with 
 it and entered into all its views ! Yes, with men 
 who separated from England all that retained the 
 principles of a Sydney and a Hampden. 
 
 [Page 297. "As Mr. Fox proceeded in his 
 researches among the Archives, an occasional day 
 intervened, as he advanced in his progress, which 
 was given to invitations, or visits of an interesting 
 nature. A dejetiner, given by Madame Recamier, 
 at Clichy, at this time, collected almost every 
 distinguished person at Paris : we went there. . . . 
 So much has been said of the beauty of the 
 charming hostess, that it would be superfluous 
 to say more, than that every one was captivated 
 by it. But her simple and unaffected manners, 
 a genuine mildness and goodness of disposition, 
 obvious in all she said and did, with as little vanity 
 as is possible to conceive, in a young woman so 
 extravagantly admired, were still more interesting. 
 She received her visitors with singular ease and 
 frankness. The house at Clichy was a pretty one, 
 
 1 " With respect," Trotter proceeds, " for the rights of humanity, 
 and mercy for the tortured Americans : loudly and repeatedly he 
 raised his voice in their favour, and if he did not convince the ministry, 
 he at length convinced the nation."
 
 190 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 and the gardens extended to the river ; in the 
 latter (sic), the company walked about till all 
 were assembled."] 
 
 Page 298. " [There] for the first time we saw 
 General Moreau. The general is negligent in his 
 dress." 
 
 And in every thing he says or does. He was 
 always fond of saying a petulant thing about the 
 chief Consul, and was pleased with those who could 
 say it better : a certain proof, if not of his enmity, 
 at least of his ill-will and disaffection. It can 
 hardly be said that it was rancour, for there was 
 not strength enough in him to turn sour, but 
 there was a peevish disappointment, a perverse 
 and languid vexation. He is respected and 
 esteemed in his family and among his officers, 
 but his wisdom was more conspicuous before he 
 was crossed by fortune. It was of a nature to 
 profit by that of others ; which is perhaps, in 
 political and military affairs, the best wisdom of 
 all. In this temper he followed, and was guided 
 by, the genius of Pichegru, a silent and stern 
 man, who pointed out from a distance the way 
 to victory. 
 
 Page 305. " The monuments franpaisj disposed 
 in a manner the happiest that can be conceived." 
 
 1 ' ' The Musee des Monuments Nationaux/ Miss Berry wrote in her 
 journal, in March, 1802, " occupies the whole emplacement of the 
 Convent des Petits Augustins. Here they have brought together all
 
 A FASCINATING HOSTESS 191 
 
 Monuments lose their interest when they have 
 been removed from the places where they were 
 first erected. That of Heloise and Abelard, in 
 the center of a quadrangle, with some dozen 
 others, and a little stick of weeping willow bent 
 over it, did more than lose all its effect. Paris 
 is not the Paraclete. 
 
 Page 313. " [Previous to our leaving Paris for 
 La Grange, 1 ] Madame Cabarrus, ci-devant Tallien, 
 gave an elegant and sumptuous dinner to Mr. Fox." 
 
 Here are no such remarks as were made about 
 Miss Williams ; nothing is said of Mr. Fox's 
 great condescension, no admiration is raised about 
 his dignity and sweetness. Miss Williams was 
 distinguished for many and great attainments, 
 Madame Cabarrus for none. O'Connor was of 
 the party. 
 
 Page 313. " [Every thing which taste, genius, 
 or art could contrive, conspired to make this the 
 most perfect sort of entertainment I had witnessed. 
 Madame Cabarrus was a most lovely woman, some- 
 thing upon a large scale, and of the most fascinating 
 manners. She was rather in disgrace at court, 
 where decorum and morals were beginning to be 
 
 the figures of the kings, from St. Denis and every other place ; all the 
 tombs and monuments of their great men and women ; in short, all 
 the spoil of the churches and convents from almost every part of the 
 country." Journals, ii. 152. 
 
 1 The residence of the Marquis de Lafayette, to whom Mr. Fox was 
 about to pay a visit.
 
 192 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 severely attended to ; Madame was supposed, when 
 separated from her husband, to have been indiscreet, 
 and did not appear there. 
 
 " Most of Mr. Fox's friends were at this dinner ; 
 but the surprise, and, indeed, displeasure of some 
 English characters of political consequence, was 
 great at finding that Mr. Arthur O'Connor was one 
 of the guests. This had been done inadvertently 
 by Madame Cabarrus, and was certainly not con- 
 sidered.] Mr. (now Lord) Erskine was extremely 
 uneasy lest evil report should misrepresent this 
 matter in England." 1 
 
 Consciousness of integrity is enough for honest 
 men ; the shades of opinion fly over them, and 
 leave no mortifying chill on their bosoms. I am 
 sorry to hear this of Lord Erskine, whose mind 
 has also been much agitated by the Revelations 
 poor man ! 
 
 {Pages 315 316. "On the 1st Vendemiare 
 (September 23d) another levee was held, at which 
 Mr. Fox was present. ... It was usual to invite 
 those present at a former one to dinner on the 
 subsequent one. Mr. Fox on this occasion, there- 
 fore, dined with the first Consul. I recollect well 
 his return in the evening to the Hotel de 
 Richelieu ; he said Bonaparte talked a great deal, 
 and I inferred at the time, that he who engrossed 
 
 1 " Mr. Fox," Trotter adds, ' ' ever magnanimous, treated it as an 
 unavoidable, though unlucky circumstance. He spoke to Mr. O'Connor 
 as usual, and lost none of the enjoyment of the evening from an event, 
 which being trivial, must be forgotten when malignity was fatigued 
 with recounting it." Memoirs, p. 314.
 
 DINNER AT THE PALACE 193 
 
 the conversation with Mr. Fox, debarred himself 
 of much instruction, and did not feel his value 
 sufficiently. Mr. Fox, however, was pleased, or I 
 may say amused. After dinner, which was a short 
 one, the first Consul retired, with a select number, 
 to Madame Bonaparte's apartments in the 
 Tuileries, where the rest of the evening was 
 spent. Mr. Fox appeared to consider Bonaparte 
 as a young man who was a good deal intoxicated 
 with his success and surprizing elevation, and did 
 not doubt of his sincerity as to the maintenance of 
 peace."] 
 
 Page 317. "[Bonaparte spoke a good deal 
 about the possibility of doing away all difference 
 between the inhabitants of the two worlds of 
 blending the black and the white, and having 
 universal peace !] Mr. Fox [related a considerable 
 part of the evening's conversation, with which he 
 was certainly much diverted, but he] had imbibed 
 no improved impressions of the first Consul's genius 
 from what passed." 
 
 It is pleasing and flattering to self-love to 
 discover something extraordinary in such charac- 
 ters. When we first look at them, when we first 
 hear them speak, they strike ; but the second 
 sentence generally destroys the effect of the first, 
 the second interview invariably. The first Consul 
 talked of blending the Black and the White. It 
 is an operation in which I should have no objection 
 to hear that he was personally employed ; but, 
 carrying it on with the vigour and to the extent 
 
 25
 
 194 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 of his other operations, he would leave us as little 
 of physical beauty in the world as he has left of 
 moral. In another century or two, men would 
 flock to the Tuileries to see the frightful faces 
 of Antinous, Meleager, Apollo, and Venus, with 
 their strait legs, sharp noses, and wavy hair. 
 
 Page 342. " [The last day of my stay in Paris 
 being one on which a levee was held, I went with 
 Mr. Fox and some of his friends. . . .] Bonaparte's 
 former question [of] Etes-vous catholique ? [to me, 
 when informed that I was an Irish gentleman] was 
 not repeated." 
 
 There was no dignity or politeness, or good 
 sense, or propriety in this question. Louis XIV. 
 would never have asked it ; for, although a bigot, 
 he was a gentleman. 
 
 [Page 348. " The government was too recently 
 established, when I was in France, to decide what 
 effect it had upon the people."] 
 
 Page 349. " [The taxes were very high, but 
 they were equally imposed in 1802 ] there were 
 no reversions or sinecures." 
 
 Nor are there yet ; no wonder we do not con- 
 sider it as quite a regular government. Ours is 
 the one to teach philosophy. Our passions have 
 been well exercised, and are grown perfectly cool, 
 and we do not go to our lesson in a state of 
 repletion. We have learned, or ought to have
 
 VIRGILIAN EPITHETS 195 
 
 learned, patience ; we have been taught several 
 very good new prayers, and are put into a frame 
 of mind to be very sincerely penitent. But I am 
 sorry to find that there are still some restless spirits 
 in the lower forms, who say that if it must 
 continue so with us to the end of the chapter 
 they care not how much margin there is. 
 
 Page 349. "[There was evidently now not 
 only a commencement of a new government, but 
 of a new sera of things : the radical change had 
 been so great, that it might be said, as of a new 
 order of things rising up 
 
 Jura magistratusque legunt, sanctumque senatum. 
 Hie portus alii effodiunt :] hie alta theatris 
 Fundamenta locant alii, immanesque columnas 
 Rupibus excidunt, scenis decora alta futuris." 1 
 
 The author is very fond of long extracts from 
 Virgil, which I read willingly through wherever 
 I find them, and as Mr. Fox did not make any 
 remark on this passage, I will hazard one. 
 
 The words in italics point my aim. There is no 
 epithet of which Virgil is so fond ; it is the only 
 one he has used redundantly. 2 I do not, however, 
 think that he would have admitted it in this 
 situation ; it holds a similar one just above ; the 
 word was probably apta. Decorations adapted to, 
 
 1 Virgil,, JRneid, i. 426. 
 
 1 Compare Lander's Works, v. 87 : " In reading the Gerusalemme 
 Liberata, I remarked, that among the epithets, the poet is fondest of 
 grande : I had remarked that Virgil is fondest of altui."
 
 196 COURT OF BONAPARTE 
 
 and worthy of, the magnificent scenes to be repre- 
 sented on that public theatre. 
 
 I could, perhaps, if I looked into my little 
 edition, find some other places marked, where 
 alterations might be suggested. We are not to 
 fancy that absolute perfection is to be found in 
 the writers of antiquity. In general they are 
 greatly more correct than ours, but they also, and 
 even the greatest of them, have their blemishes. 
 The lines I am about to transcribe are exquisite: 
 
 Quin etiam hyberno moliris sidere classem, 
 Et mediis properas Aquilonibus ire per altum ; 
 Crudelis ! quid si non arva aliena, domosque 
 Ignotas peteres, et Troja antiqua maneret, 
 Troja per undosum peteretur classibus aequor? 1 
 
 If hybernum were substituted for undosum, how 
 incomparably more beautiful would the sentence 
 be for this energetic repetition ! Adjectives in 
 osus express abundance and intensity to such a 
 degree that some learned men are of opinion they 
 take it from odi, the most potent and universal 
 of feelings. If so, famosus, jocosus, fabulosus, 
 nemorosus, must have been a later brood, which 
 has increased prodigiously in modern Italy, and 
 nearly to the same amount in England, France, 
 and Spain. Undosum, however, with all its force, 
 would be far from an equivalent for hybernum, 
 
 1 Virgil, JEneid, iv. 309. Much of the next and following para- 
 graphs was repeated by Laiidor in Works, iv. 123, 124.
 
 DIDO'S APPEAL TO AENEAS 197 
 
 even if hybernum derived no fresh importance 
 from its apposition. 
 
 The passion of Dido is always true to nature. 
 Other women have called their lovers cruel ; she 
 calls ^Eneas so, not for betraying and deserting 
 her, but for departing and hazarding his life, dear 
 to her, at the instant he was depriving her of hers, 
 by encountering the tempests of a wintery sea. 
 
 "Even if it were not to foreign lands and 
 unknown habitations that you were hastening ; 
 even if Troy were in existence, and you were 
 destined thither, would you choose a season like 
 this ? Would you navigate a sea of which you are 
 ignorant, under the stars of winter ? "
 
 CHAPTER XI 
 
 MINISTRY OF ALL THE TALENTS 
 
 Death of William Pitt The Coalition of 1806 The King's dislike 
 of Fox Lady Moira's forecast Grenvilleites Monarch and 
 Empire Hateful phrases The Irish Roman Catholics Lord 
 Grey and George III. Irish politicians A corrupt and venal 
 Parliament Eulogy of Sir John Newport Fox and Grattan. 
 
 [Pages 357-9. " In the commencement of the 
 year 1806, after the demise of Mr. Pitt, there 
 existed a pretty strong sentiment in the nation, 
 but a great deal more powerful one among certain 
 parties, that a combination of rank, talent, and 
 popularity, was imperiously required to support 
 the State. . . . 
 
 " I am much inclined to think that Mr. Fox had 
 determined to devote himself to history, previous 
 to Mr. Pitt's death ; nor do I think that event 
 would have altered his intentions, unless the voice 
 of the people, reaching the throne, had concurred in 
 seeing placed at the head of the ministry a friend 
 to the just equilibrium between regal authority and 
 popular rights, a man of commanding genius and 
 extensive knowledge. Assailed, however, by per- 
 suasion, and willing to sacrifice his own opinions for 
 the good of his country, his judgment and feelings 
 gave way, and he consented to take a part in the 
 ministry, in conjunction with Lord Grenville. 
 
 " He could not be ignorant that such a ministry 
 
 198
 
 was unstable. The basis was without foundation. 
 Even the superstructure was Pittite, to which 
 Mr. Fox lent the sanction and grace of his illus- 
 trious name. It is not improbable that the court, 
 unobstructed by Lord Grenville and his friends, 
 might have determined on placing Mr. Fox at the 
 helm of affairs. Certain it is, that his admission to 
 the sole management of the government, or his 
 rejection, would have benefited the cause of the 
 people."] 
 
 Page 358. "The voice of the people reaching 
 the throne, had concurred in seeing" etc. My 
 business is not with expressions, but with facts. 
 The people cared nothing about the matter. They 
 expected nothing better, and feared nothing worse. 
 No event ever caused less interest than the new 
 coalition. 
 
 Page 358. "Assailed, however, by persuasion, 
 and willing to sacrifice his own opinions for the 
 good of his country, his judgment and feeling gave 
 way, and he consented to take a part in the ministry 
 in conjunction with Lord Grenville." 1 
 
 It would be impossible to state a stronger fact 
 in any language, to prove how utterly unfit was 
 such a sacrificing mind for the management of this 
 country at such a crisis. 
 
 It is precisely of that order which never can 
 
 1 William Pitt died January 23, 1806. The Ministry of all the 
 Talents, with Lord Grenville as First Lord of the Treasury, and 
 Mr. Fox as Foreign Secretary, took office in February.
 
 200 MINISTRY OF ALL THE TALENTS 
 
 govern well or be well governed ; for if its 
 judgment and feeling give way, so slippery and 
 elastic is it, that nothing can rest on it uprightly 
 and stably. What must those feelings be, which 
 the good of the country requires should be sacri- 
 ficed ? What must be that judgment which contrary 
 judgments can warp ? 
 
 Page 358. "Even the superstructure was Pittite, 
 to which Mr. Fox lent the sanction and grace of his 
 illustrious name " More shame for him, then. What 
 he had opposed in doing ten years together, he 
 sanctioned and signed when done! Honest men of 
 all parties ! is this right, is it wise ? Is it not weak, 
 wicked, infamous ; does it not undermine all trust 
 and confidence ; does it not indispose us from aiding 
 in any good, lest, after all our zeal and labour, 
 the object should be abandoned ? Speak plainly ; 
 come forward without turn or subterfuge ; lay 
 your hands on your hearts, if they are English, 
 and answer this one question. 
 
 Page 359. " It is not improbable that the court, 
 unobstructed by Lord Grenville and his friends, 
 might have determined on placing Mr. Fox at the 
 helm of affairs." 
 
 The court ? Who ? What advisers of the King ? 
 George III. never liked him, and those about the 
 royal person would not propose the minister who 
 might displace them. They never thought him
 
 THE COUNTESS OF MOIRA 201 
 
 more likely to be serviceable than his opponents, 
 and would not have recommended him if they had. 
 
 Page 360. " [Early in February, 1806, the new 
 ministry, with Mr. Fox and Lord Grenville at their 
 head, were called to his Majesty's councils ; and as 
 he wished to place me near himself, he required 
 me to join him the day after he had received 
 his Majesty's commands. I left Ireland with no 
 sanguine hopes that a ministry thus constituted 
 could render much service to these countries, and 
 particularly to Ireland.] Lady Moira, 1 whose name 
 and character is deserving of equal admiration 
 and respect, distinctly pointed out to me the 
 impossibility of the ministry existing long." 
 
 This woman had more wisdom than all the 
 politicians and ministers of both parties. No 
 person in either kingdom was more distinguished 
 for sound sense, and, what will always arise from 
 it, right principles. If Mr. Fox foresaw what 
 she did, with the same clearness, he must either 
 have been very foolish or very base to undertake 
 any part in the business. 
 
 1 Lady Moira, mother of the future Governor-General of India 
 (afterwards Marquis of Hastings). Before her marriage she was 
 Lady Elizabeth Hastings, of whom Steele said that "to behold her 
 is an immediate check to loose behaviour, and to love her is a liberal 
 education." Taller, No. 44. " I saw Lady Moira," Trotter writes, 
 " after Mr. Fox's death ; she received me with great kindness, but 
 great emotion, she took me by the hand, as I addressed her. ' We 
 have lost everything,' said she, the tears rolling in torrents down her 
 venerable cheeks ; ' that great man was a guide for them all ; he was 
 their great support, and now there is nothing cheering in the prospect. 
 For me, I have nearly run my course, I shall remain but a little 
 longer, but others will suffer ; the loss of Fox is irreparable.' " 
 Memoirs, p. 364. 
 
 26
 
 202 MINISTRY OF ALL THE TALENTS 
 
 I am happy to read on. Here is a just and 
 eloquent narrative of facts, relative to this illus- 
 trious woman. The generosity of her heart, her 
 remoteness from Fox, and her proximity to the 
 despicably poor creatures who managed the affairs 
 of Ireland, made her think more highly of him 
 than her experience had warranted. 
 
 Page 368. " [In Fox his Majesty at length saw 
 the great shield of the country, and by calling him 
 into the cabinet, on the demise of Mr. Pitt, gave 
 a proof that he had been held in thraldom by the 
 overbearing minister, who it may be truly said, 
 could bear no rival near the throne. There was 
 much greatness of mind in the venerable monarch 
 who thus rose above the long system of delusion 
 practised against him, and he proved himself 
 thereby both the lover of his people, and also 
 the ultimate approver of Mr. Fox's political career. 
 With such an adviser, he now perceived America 
 would have been unalienated, Great Britain un- 
 burthened, and France of just dimensions and 
 moderate power. Afflicted as the father of his 
 people now unhappily is, bowed down with years 
 and infirmity, it is a consolation to his family, and 
 satisfaction to those who sincerely venerate him, 
 that, with his faculties unclouded, and his health 
 unimpaired,] he chose Charles James Fox as his 
 minister, instead of continuing the system of 
 Mr. Pitt." 
 
 I should have said, Mr. Fox was appointed 
 minister, and the system of Mr. Pitt continued ; 
 and I should have been supported by what follows.
 
 FINE SOUNDING PHRASES 203 
 
 [Page 369. " Had Lord Grenville and his 
 friends been thrown aside, much more would have 
 been effected, but] party was too strong for the 
 monarch." l 
 
 I hate that word. British monarch and British 
 empire are fine-sounding words, but I delight 
 sermone pedestri. I like king and kingdom much 
 better, and have no objection to the phrase of 
 Queen Elizabeth, commonwealth, when it does not 
 remind me of speculating agitators and shuffling 
 demagogues. Whoever is desirous to see more 
 on this subject may consult Lord Molesworth's 
 preface to the Franco-Gallia? 
 
 Page 376. " [Mr. Fox's loss was peculiarly felt 
 in the cabinet, on the affair of] the Catholic bill 3 
 forced on the King by Lord Grey, then Lord 
 Howick [and Lord Grenville]." 
 
 When I consider that the King is the true 
 representative of the English people, that all 
 
 1 " And the genius of Fox," Trotter gloomily adds, " was thus 
 cramped, thwarted, and counteracted." 
 
 1 Franco-Gallia : or an account of the ancient free State of France 
 and most other parts of Europe before the loss of their liberties. 
 " Written originally in Latin by the famous civilian Francis Hotoman, 
 in the year 1674, and translated into English by the author of The 
 Account of Denmark " (London, 1711). The translator was Robert, first 
 Viscount Molesworth (1656-1725). A second edition, with a new 
 preface by the translator, appeared in 1721. In this Lord Molesworth 
 said : " Queen Elizabeth, and many other of our best Princes, were not 
 scrupulous of calling our Government a Commonwealth, even in their 
 solemn speeches to Parliament." 
 
 The introduction of the Roman Catholic Army and Navy Service 
 Bill led, in March, 1807, to the dismissal of the Ministry.
 
 204 MINISTRY OF ALL THE TALENTS 
 
 other representation has been, at various times, 
 a fallacy and phantom, and the real presence has 
 been vested and concentered in his august person, 
 I am shocked at the idea of any thing forced on 
 him, and the more so by a person who received 
 at his hands the most permanent and distinguishing 
 marks of royal favour. I will not trust myself 
 with the belief of such an outrage on the 
 sovereign, such a scandalous and infamous breach 
 of gratitude and loyalty. It would have been 
 high treason ; and although the ministers might 
 not have impeached him, as they wanted only 
 his place, yet the people, who pity the infirmities 
 of their king, and remember all his good-humour 
 and affability, would have been clamorous for the 
 punishment of so atrocious a culprit. It would 
 be impossible for any king, after this, to admit 
 such a person to his councils, even if he had useful 
 talents and graceful manners. The secretary of 
 Mr. Fox had perhaps more justice on his side, 
 when he represented this assistant as the one 
 with whose forwardness, precipitancy, and folly, the 
 minister had most reason to be offended. It would 
 be difficult for him, in these circumstances, to 
 observe that temperance in phrase which the 
 delinquent had not observed in practice. Suppose 
 two writers, the one of present, the other of past 
 events ; suppose them to possess the same intelli- 
 gence, and to employ the same style, on the
 
 HISTORY AND MEMOIRS 205 
 
 misconduct of any minister, or the bad tendency 
 of any transaction ; still that perhaps would be 
 considered as arrogant or malicious in the con- 
 temporary, which would be received as deliberate 
 and strict justice from the subsequent historian. 
 
 Thus a writer not more powerful than a Roscoe, 
 with sentences puffed out and highly coloured, 
 like a poor child's cheek in cold weather, would 
 be listened to as a narrator of old occurrences 
 more attentively, for instance, than a St. Simon, 
 with all his simplicity and force, if he had published 
 his memoirs in his life. This is a reason why, 
 in speaking of those around us, we should avoid 
 the appearance of exaggeration. Vigorous minds 
 will, without effort, throw the obtrusive and pre- 
 sumptuous into the dust, but it is an unnecessary 
 effort to kick them up again ; such people as 
 Lord Grey should be permitted to go on, whether 
 they chuse to be crawling or rampant, into their 
 obscurity ; it is an idle and unworthy action to 
 intercept the peering glimpses of their ephemeral 
 glory. When they commit vile actions, speak 
 them out : that is a duty ; but nothing is gained 
 by expatiating on generalities, or by representing 
 them as more impudent and outrageous than 
 they are. 
 
 Pages 383-5. " [Impressed with a lively sense 
 of the value of Ireland, I stated to Mr. Fox the 
 necessity of immediate and effectual steps to relieve
 
 206 MINISTRY OF ALL THE TALENTS 
 
 her. ... I do not think that Mr. Fox's mind was 
 at all at ease upon the subject of Ireland. . . . He 
 did not affect to say that much could be done, . . . 
 and when I afterwards renewed the subject, I found 
 in him the same feelings.] It was evident that 
 Mr. Grattan and Mr. Ponsonby, and their friends, 
 had made no conditions for her (Ireland). I 
 ever considered this as a fatal dereliction of her 
 interests." 
 
 The secretary and friend of Mr. Fox is always 
 sincere and open, and he hesitates not to expose 
 the baseness of his Whig countrymen. Irishmen 
 in general, if any facts are adduced against their 
 corrupt and venal parliament, now happily extinct, 
 or against those remnants of it which Pitt's 
 explosion has blown across the channel, speak of 
 the utter ignorance or deplorable misinformation 
 of the English. One would imagine they were 
 natives of Japan, in such secrecy do they believe 
 all the events of their country to be involved. 
 But their country is more interesting to us than 
 they themselves are aware. We read more of 
 their best informed writers than they do, more 
 attentively and more dispassionately. They fancy 
 the contrary, because we read other things too, 
 and it is a consolation to fatuity that general read- 
 ing must be necessarily superficial. No mistake 
 is greater. In the regions of literature lights 
 are thrown from a prodigious distance, and spring 
 reciprocally from all directions. A little reflection
 
 AN ILLUSTRIOUS IRISHMAN 207 
 
 will teach the lower order of gentlemen that 
 points of law, politics, and taste, can be discussed 
 in a better way than by duel ; an ordeal which 
 we will reserve, if they please, as an infallible 
 proof only in affairs of honour and chastity. 
 There is no occasion to extend its jurisdiction 
 any further. 
 
 After lamenting the frail patriotism of his 
 countrymen, in which the supersaturation of 
 colouring should have excited a suspicion of 
 rottenness, the secretary's mind might have re- 
 posed with decent pride on the virtues of one 
 illustrious character. There is a man in whose 
 whole political life, and, I have heard also, in 
 whose private, no opponent has been able, how- 
 ever invidious and acute, to detect an unwise, 
 or dishonourable, or disingenuous action. Would 
 to God I could leave any doubt or uncertainty 
 of the person to whom I allude, and that the 
 description were as applicable to any other as 
 to Sir John Newport. 1 
 
 This is the man who is destined, if any is, to 
 appease the discontents of Ireland ; and to soften 
 the fanaticism of a church, which, in the paroxysm 
 of its intemperance, has assailed the peaceable 
 
 1 Sir John Newport, Chancellor of the Irish Exchequer in the 
 Ministry of all the Talents a staunch Whig, a genuine Irishman, 
 and a steady supporter of Catholic emancipation. He died February 18, 
 1843. ' ' Few men have rendered more service to Ireland. ... In 
 adverse times he was an enlightened reformer, a true, a zealous, and a 
 judicious friend of the country." Examiner, March 1, 1840.
 
 208 MINISTRY OF ALL THE TALENTS 
 
 tenets of another, and staggered in every direction 
 from its own. 
 
 Page 386. "[I am sure, too, that, had Mr. 
 Grattan and his friends expressly declared that 
 they must know what terms of relief would be 
 granted to Ireland, before they could support the 
 new ministry, Mr. Fox would have found himself 
 strengthened by the demand, and that if no other 
 man in the cabinet had listened to their proposals, 
 he would. The Catholics, helpless as they were, 
 having none of their body in the English parlia- 
 ment, acted a wise as well as generous part in 
 relying silently upon Mr. Fox ; but Mr. Grattan, 
 having become an English member for Ireland, 
 ought to have insisted upon positive measures of 
 redress for her. ... I am certain Mr. Fox would 
 not have been displeased at this conduct.] He was 
 not a man to shudder at a division in the cabinet." 
 
 He might have cast the rind very easily, when 
 an air of popularity was beginning to play about 
 him. By a simple and straitforward movement, 
 preserving all his own calmness and politeness 
 towards the King, he might have deprecated the 
 Catholic cause, but strengthened it so enormously 
 as to terrify the court into concessions. His 
 coyness would make the Catholics the more 
 pressing, particularly as they knew his inclina- 
 tions towards them ; it would at the same time 
 be a sign, however fallacious, of deference to the 
 King's opinion and scruples, of firmness in resisting
 
 MR. FOX'S ONLY ERROR 209 
 
 the importunity of his own wishes, and of judgment 
 in foreseeing the moment when it would be most 
 expedient to accede. If a minister is to gratify 
 two parties, he cannot do it without a little 
 duplicity. The only error of Mr. Fox was, that 
 he thought duplicity quite enough ; but on the 
 other side of the statesman must be dexterity. 
 The admission of one or two more principles of 
 right would have done the business. He ought 
 not to have permitted any thing great and 
 important to be done without him or after him. 
 
 27
 
 CHAPTER XII 
 
 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 Gatherings at St. Anne's Hill Fox venerated Chaucer Spenser's 
 Faery Queene Dryden's majestic verse Burns, Chatterton, 
 Cowper Fox attacked by Canning An extraordinary boy 
 Canning's duel with Castlereagh Lord Holland and Sir R. 
 Adair Moliere and Klopstock How it strikes the contemporary 
 " Public characters " A modest biography The Oxford 
 tutor Fox's illness Retirement to Chiswick The Prince Regent 
 Last days of C. J. Fox Capture of Buenos Ayres. 
 
 [Pages 389-95. " In the spring of the year 1806, 
 Mr. Fox was always happy to get to St. Anne's 
 Hill for a few days, and withdraw from the harassing 
 occupations of a ministry, which it required all his 
 vigour, and all the weight of his name to uphold. 
 . . . He seemed more than ever to delight in the 
 country. A small party, consisting of General 
 Fitzpatrick, and Lord Albemarle and family, found 
 their time pass lightly away ; Mr. Fox, with a few 
 chosen friends, was also truly happy and cheerful. 
 . . . Lord Albemarle was sincerely beloved by 
 Mr. Fox ; Lady Albemarle, whose sincerity and 
 naivete were very pleasing, and who was the lovely 
 mother of some fine children, there with her, also 
 contributed to make St. Anne's Hill still more agree- 
 able. . . . While at St. Anne's Hill, the despatches 
 were brought to Mr. Fox, and forwarded from 
 thence to his Majesty. 
 
 210
 
 A MINISTER'S DIVERSIONS 211 
 
 " It might be supposed by some, that the cares of 
 his new situation abstracted him from all thoughts 
 of his Greek ; but I am going to give a proof of the 
 lively concern he continued to take in every thing 
 relating to the poets. Early one morning, I had 
 Euripides in my hand, and was reading Alcestis. 
 . . . ' How do you like it ? ' said Mr. Fox, entering, 
 and well pleased to think a little about Euripides, 
 instead of the perplexing state of the continent, and 
 the complicated difficulties at home. . . . 
 
 " Mr. Fox's memory showed itself to be peculiarly 
 powerful in regard to the poets. He had not read 
 Alcestis, and consequently, the admired passage, for 
 a long series of years, and yet he anticipated the 
 very spot where he expected me to stop, with as 
 much precision as if he had been looking over my 
 shoulder. I have seen him, too, in speaking of 
 Spenser's Faery Queene and Tasso, turn to the 
 works of the Italian poet, and point out, here and 
 there, lines and images, similar to parts of Spenser's 
 work, with as much rapidity as if they had been 
 marked out for him. Among the ancient English 
 poets he entertained a sincere veneration for 
 Chaucer, a poet, in tenderness and natural 
 description, resembling Euripides."] 
 
 " He entertained a sincere veneration for 
 Chaucer." He entertained a sincere veneration for 
 so many, that we have reason to suppose he had 
 little discrimination. His secretary has not produced 
 or commemorated one specimen of acute or elegant 
 criticism, one striking or new remark. Chaucer 
 is indeed an admirable poet ; until the time of
 
 212 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 Shakespeare none equalled him ; and perhaps none 
 after, until ours. 1 The truth of his delineations, 
 his humour, his simplicity, his tenderness, how 
 different from the distorted images and gorgeous 
 languor of Spenser! The language, too, of Chaucer 
 was the language of his day, the language of those 
 Englishmen who conquered France ; that of Spenser 
 is a strange uncouth compound of words, chopt 
 off in some places and screwed out in others. 
 His poem reminds me of a rich painted window, 
 broken in pieces, where, amidst a thousand petty 
 images, worked most laboriously and overlaid with 
 colour, not one is well-proportioned or entire, 
 where the whole is disfigured and deranged and 
 darkened by the lead that holds them together. 
 This, however, is not the principal fault, though 
 surely a great one : the worst of all is the dis- 
 gusting and filthy images on which he rests so 
 frequently, and which he represents with such 
 minuteness. He never attempts the terrific but 
 he slips back again into nastiness. Envy chewing 
 a toad* is described with all the coarseness and 
 laboriousness of the worst Dutch painter. In 
 
 1 Compare this with Lander's verses to Robert Browning : 
 "Browning ! since Chaucer was alive and hale, 
 No man hath walkt along our roads with step 
 So active, so inquiring eye, or tongue 
 So varied in discourse," etc. Works, viii. 152. 
 3 " And next to him malicious Envy rode 
 
 Upon a ravenous wolfe, and still did chaw 
 Between his cankered teeth a venemous tode." 
 
 Faery Queene, I. iv. 30.
 
 POETS AND THEIR CRITICS 213 
 
 satirical poets, such as Juvenal and Swift, we are 
 somewhat less shocked at indelicacy, because in 
 these there is no incongruity, however little a 
 way such scenes and images may conduce towards 
 virtue ; but in allegory we are led to improvement 
 through delight. 
 
 Uncouth forms in disarray, 
 
 Words which time has thrown away, 
 
 would be considered as blemishes in another, 
 writing at a time when our language, if it had 
 not acquired all its ease and polish, was in the 
 highest state of its maturity and strength ; but 
 Spenser has been treated with peculiar lenity 
 and favour, because no poet has been found so 
 convenient by the critics to set up against their 
 contemporaries. The days of chivalry seemed to 
 be closing at this period, and their last lustre 
 was reflected on his gorgeous allegory. Those 
 who were opposed to Pope and Dryden, such 
 as Blackmore and Addison, and Shadwell and 
 Halifax, and Buckingham and Roscommon, are 
 quoted as poets, only to show the instability of 
 a premature and inordinate reputation. 
 
 But I am much mistaken if the time is far distant 
 when the sound sense and vigour of Dryden, and 
 his majestic versification, will again come into play, 
 in despite of the impediments and encumbrances 
 brought together from the refuse of his genius,
 
 214 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 not more by the bad taste than by the greediness 
 of publishers. That he cannot be read universally 
 is a grievous fault, particularly as it arises from 
 his gross immodesty and coarse allusions. Enough 
 has been said on this subject. Ample justice has 
 been awarded him in the greatest effort of the 
 great Johnson ; such is the Life of Dryden. He 
 too, like Spenser, complained of neglect, and 
 much more justly. In Dryden there is a degree 
 of anger that his claims were overlooked and his 
 rights withholden ; in Spenser there is a lowness 
 of spirits and a peevish whine that he could not 
 have every thing he wanted. Weaker minds are 
 lulled with his melancholy, stronger are offended 
 at his unmanly and unreasonable discontent. It 
 would be ridiculous to compare him with Burns, 
 or Chatterton, or Cowper, yet in the attention 
 he experienced, and in the largesses he received 
 from the powerful, how infinitely more fortunate ! 
 The present reign has produced a greater number 
 of good poets than any in modern times ; but 
 the ears of our kings are still German, and the 
 Muses have never revelled under the Georgian 
 star. This, however disgraceful to our royal family, 
 is the reason perhaps why poetry of late has not 
 been degraded and dishonoured by flattery to 
 princes and ministers, and why we have hardly 
 one instance in our days of great talents united 
 with great baseness. Some of our most admired
 
 SPENSER'S FAERY QUEENE 215 
 
 and excellent poems are, like the Faery Queene, 
 without much order and arrangement, a deficiency 
 which few, either of readers or of critics, are 
 capable of observing. But the construction and 
 proportions of a poem require not only much 
 care, but, what would be less apparent to the 
 ordinary reader, much genius and much imagina- 
 tion. Fitness and order and convenience, are 
 terms very applicable to the epic, and if not 
 often employed, it is because they are not found 
 often. The Faery Queene is rambling and dis- 
 continuous, full of every impropriety, and utterly 
 deficient in a just conception both of passion 
 and of character. In Chaucer, on the contrary, 
 we recognise the strong homely strokes, the broad 
 and negligent facility, of a great master. Within 
 his time and Shakespeare's, there was nothing 
 comparable, nor, I think, between Shakespeare 
 and Burns, a poet who much resembles him 
 in a knowledge of nature and manners ; who, in 
 addition to this, is the most excellent of pastoral 
 poets, not excepting Theocritus ; and who in satire, 
 if that indeed can add any thing to qualities so 
 much greater, is not inferior to Pope, or Horace, 
 or Aristophanes. 
 
 Page 397. " In a certain debate, Mr. Canning 
 attacked him with a greater degree of animosity 
 than I thought becoming." 
 
 No acrimony is becoming, but some is natural.
 
 216 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 It is natural for people to speak ill of those 
 who, they are conscious, must think ill of them. 
 Mr. Fox was the patron of young Canning, and 
 treated him with much kindness. But if Mr. Fox 
 was very good to him, Mr. Pitt had the more 
 sugar-plums to give. He was a very extraordinary 
 boy, and is a very extraordinary boy still. He 
 has not grown an inch in intellect ; he has, how- 
 ever, given one sure and unequivocal proof of his 
 abilities, in making Lord Castlereagh popular for 
 several days as long a time as Lord Castlereagh 
 was ever thought of. Those who have read the 
 subject of their quarrel, and the letters that passed 
 between them, will find that one prevaricates, and 
 that both are answerable to the country for the 
 loss of five thousand men, and for the worst of 
 all our badly planned attacks. 1 Canning is among 
 those sour productions, which acquire an early 
 tinge of maturity, and drop off. It is idleness or 
 unwariness in those who pick them up and taste 
 them, and folly or shame in those who do not 
 spit them out. 
 
 I remember an odd paraphrase of the verses 
 which were written by Caesar on Terence. 2 They 
 are a little changed for the purpose : 
 
 1 The duel between Canning and Lord Castlereagb was fought on 
 September 21, 1809. 
 
 3 Quoted by Suetonius, Opera, ii. 1318, Delphin ed. "Landor," 
 Emerson writes, " invited me to breakfast. . . . He entertained 
 us at once with reciting half a dozen hexameter lines of Julius 
 Caesar's! from Donatus, he said." English Traits, p. 4.
 
 PETULANT GEORGE CANNING 217 
 
 Tu quoque, tu in summis, o dimidiate minister, 
 Poneris, et merito, insulsi sermonis amator; 
 Acribus atque utinam scriptis adjuncta foret vis 
 Publica, ut aequato virtus polleret honore, 
 Unum hoc maceror, et doleo tibi deesse, Canini ! 
 
 And thou art popt among the great, 
 Forsooth ! a minister of state ! 
 A Windham, were invective wit ; 
 Would clamour make one, half a Pitt. 
 Satire we have, and rage, and rant : 
 Strength, spirit, these are all we want. 
 A mob and massacre or two 
 In Ireland, or at home would do, 
 And we shall see the very man in 
 The peevish petulant George Canning. 
 
 Page 402. "[While Mr. Fox thus appeared 
 contented and moderate, constant and affectionate 
 to old friends, and attached to his books and the 
 country, just as when he filled a private station, 
 he also evinced a noble disinterestedness about his 
 family and connections ; he sought neither place 
 nor pension for them on coming into office ; he 
 secured no reversions or sinecures for himself or 
 them ; and not a view or thought of his mind 
 tended to his own or family's aggrandizement. A 
 beloved and most deserving nephew, highly gifted 
 in point of talent, liberal and of congenial mind to 
 himself,] Lord Holland was without situation." 
 
 Yet I believe for I know nothing of him 
 personally no man except Adair, 1 is more fitted 
 
 1 Sir Robert Adair was afterwards Ambassador at Constantinople 
 and Vienna. He was tbe friend both of Fox and Landor, and the 
 Bobra-Dara-Adul-Phoola of Canning's satire in the Anti-Jacobin. 
 
 28
 
 218 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 for a foreign court. Good-natured, frank, generous, 
 and possessing a knowledge of modern languages 
 and courtly customs, he would be equally con- 
 ciliating and observant. Besides, any court would 
 be somewhat pleased that Mr. Fox had given it 
 a species of preference in sending his nephew to it. 
 There are some contingencies in which the heart 
 is accessible, even in courts ; this is one of them. 
 He should have sent Lord Holland to the 
 Tuileries. . 
 
 [Pages 412-14. " In the beginning of June I 
 received a message from her (Mrs. Fox), requesting 
 me to come to him. ... I found him reclining 
 upon a couch, uneasy and languid. It seemed to 
 me so sudden an attack that I was surprised and 
 shocked. . . . Henceforth his illness rapidly in- 
 creased. . . . The garden of the house at Stable 
 Yard, since the Duke of York's, was daily crowded 
 with anxious enquirers. The foreign ambassadors, 
 or ministers, or private friends of Mr. Fox, walked 
 there, eager to know his state of health."] 
 
 Page 419. "[He now saw very few persons. 
 At one singular interview I was at this time 
 present.] Mr. Sheridan wished to see Mr. Fox 
 [to which the latter reluctantly consented, request- 
 ing Lord Grey to remain in the room.] The 
 meeting was short and unsatisfactory. Mr. Fox, 
 with more coldness than I ever saw him assume to 
 any one, spoke but a few words." 
 
 Mr. Fox in private life was a most sincere and 
 amiable man. If he suppressed in society a part
 
 A COMEDIAN IN THE CABINET 219 
 
 of his indignant feelings, as a man so well-bred 
 would do, he never affected a tone of cordiality 
 towards those whom he reprobated or despised. 
 We often find indeed in close apposition the names 
 of Fox and Sheridan. 1 The conversation of the 
 day comes after us into the closet, and a little of 
 the newspaper sometimes finds its way into books. 
 By writing in these newspapers, or by contracting 
 a friendship with the editors, names appear in 
 strange conjunctions, and celebrity is sustained for 
 many years. Mr. Sheridan has written some 
 pleasant and popular comedies, and the critics of 
 the house of commons may call him the rival of 
 Moliere. Though I cannot quite assent to their 
 opinion, or believe that a comic writer ever existed 
 who could have been the rival of Moliere (for if 
 Menander was only the equivalent of two 
 Terences, 2 he certainly was not the man), yet I 
 think the French Institute erred most egregiously 
 in giving a preference over him to the turgid and 
 vociferous Klopstock. However it be, such people 
 are not to be at the head, or near the head, of 
 those who govern England. Still somewhat, and 
 not little, is due to Mr. Sheridan as a member of 
 the House. He has been more consistent than 
 
 1 " Though they acted for many years together, there never seems 
 to have been a very cordial or intimate friendship between Fox and 
 Sheridan." EARL RUSSELL'S Life of Fox, ii. 142. 
 
 1 An allusion to Julius Caesar's phrase, dimidiate Menander (see 
 p. 217), which, however, had reference to Terence's custom of knocking 
 two of Menander's plays into one.
 
 220 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 Mr. Fox, whom, if he differed from him on some 
 few occasions, he cannot be said to have deserted. 
 He is really the most public of all public men, 
 and makes a very conspicuous figure in the book 
 which exhibits them to the world. 
 
 We live in an age when persons are willing to 
 exempt posterity from all anxiety and doubts 
 concerning them, and to guard their contempor- 
 aries from any injustice or inattention towards 
 them. It is reported, and indeed seems evident, 
 that the greater part of the personages who figure 
 in the book entitled Public Characters, have 
 written their own lives and transactions. " The 
 writer of this article " seems always to know the 
 most private affairs of these momentous public 
 men. It is seldom that any anecdote can be 
 added to such very important and satisfactory 
 details, but I am enabled to add several, if several 
 are requisite, to what illustrate one of these 
 worthies who, unhappily for literature, at least 
 for his own, is recently defunct. The gentleman 
 was so extremely modest in the account he gave 
 of himself, that he has omitted all those fine 
 strokes of ingenuity for which he once was 
 celebrated, and is stiU remembered, at the uni- 
 versity. When the excellent and beloved Benwell 1 
 
 1 Landor refers, in The Letters of a Conservative (1836), to " the 
 gentle and saintly Benwell, my private tutor at Oxford." He speaks 
 of him with the same warmth of affection in a note to the Imaginary 
 Conversation. Works, iv. 400.
 
 A REMINISCENCE OF OXFORD 221 
 
 (titles which rarely come together) was about to 
 leave Trinity college in Oxford, of which he was 
 
 a tutor, the Rev. ,* one of these " Public 
 
 Characters " came into his rooms, and presented 
 the usual felicitations on his approaching marriage. 
 " Perhaps," added he, " since we must lose you, 
 and your pupils must be under some other tutor, 
 you will have the kindness to recommend them 
 to my care." 
 
 "It is my intention," said the honest and calm 
 Benwell, " to recommend one part of them to 
 Dr. Flamank, and the other to you." Disappointed 
 and vexed at this reply, he still had the admirable 
 presence of mind to conceal his feelings, and to 
 confess the fairness of the proposal. " My dear 
 friend," continued he, " your kindness will lay me 
 under eternal obligations. I hardly know how I 
 can ask you to increase them, but as I must write 
 letters of thanks to the parents of those young 
 men who are about to become my pupils, and as 
 you know my poetical pursuits and innumerable 
 avocations, will you favour me with their names, 
 
 1 It is clear from what Southey said (see Introduction) that Landor 
 was referring to the Rev. Henry Kett (1761-1825), fellow and tutor of 
 Trinity College, Oxford. There is a sketch of this gentleman in Public 
 Characters for 1805, where it is said : " Perhaps Mr. Kett has conferred 
 more honour on the University than any other individual now resident 
 there ; his name is familiar to every scholar, and very few learned men 
 of any nation visit Oxford without obtaining an introduction to him." 
 Landor ridiculed him both in prose and verse. One epigram is quoted 
 in Crabb Robinson's Diary, ii. 482 ; and others in Heroic Idyls, pp. 
 177, 204. But he was not "recently defunct" in 1812.
 
 222 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 that I may lose no time ? " Benwell did so. 
 
 Mr. immediately wrote to the parents of all 
 
 the others, to solicit the patronage of them, " as 
 the college was about to lose the talents of his 
 dear and intimate friend Mr. Benwell." 
 
 He thus endeavoured to obtain all the pupils ; 
 one half by Mr. Benwell's recommendation, the 
 other by his own dexterity ; and that he never 
 mentioned this piece of address, is a certain proof 
 that he deserved all the favour and patronage he 
 solicited. But it was not of a nature to be long 
 concealed : it was a jewel of such magnitude and 
 clearness that, on its first discovery, it threw a 
 light on a profusion of others in the same vein, 
 and encouraged both enemies and friends to pursue 
 the examination. I heard the anecdote from a 
 fellow of his college, who also gave several more, 
 equally plain and circumstantial, and which do 
 
 equal credit to Mr. 's abilities and virtues. The 
 
 doctor referred me to so many witnesses, for so 
 many and such surprising proofs of talent, that I 
 could not cease from admiring, more and more, a 
 character so indefatigable, so resolute, and so 
 candid, and discoveries of such intricacy laid open 
 unreservedly to the world. 
 
 Page 423. [" The Duke of Devonshire offered 
 him (Mr. Fox) the use of Chiswick House as a 
 resting-place, from whence, if he gained strength 
 enough, he might proceed to St. Anne's. . . . Two
 
 DESERTED BY COLLEAGUES 223 
 
 or three days before he was removed to Chis- 
 wick House, Mr. Fox sent for me, and with 
 marked hesitation and anxiety, as if he much 
 wished it, and yet was unwilling to ask it, informed 
 me of his plan of going to Chiswick House, re- 
 questing me to form one of the family there. . . . 
 About the end of July Mrs. Fox and he went 
 there, and on the following day I joined them."] 
 
 Pages 436-7. [" As his disorder had become 
 entirely confirmed, and little or no hope existed 
 of his recovery, the cabinet ceased to look to him 
 for advice ; and, before his great mind was 
 harassed by the second inroad made by the dis- 
 order,] they, the other ministers, seemed to hold 
 his retreat to Chiswick as a virtual resignation of 
 office. Lord Grenville never came there ; Lord 
 Grey, I think, rarely.'" 
 
 We knew his abilities and principles before ; we 
 now know his feelings. 
 
 Page 438. " Had I seen them catching from his 
 lips those admonitions which those who are leaving 
 the world give with peculiar effect, I should have 
 augured better of the coming time." 
 
 The person to whom he alludes in particular, not 
 only has no wisdom, but has no receptacle to catch 
 it. He and his colleague might at least have had 
 the common politeness, the mere decency, to 
 inquire if Mr. Fox's health permitted him to give 
 his advice. They acted not as if he were deprived 
 of health, but of understanding. Even in that
 
 224 LAST DAYS AND DEATH OF FOX 
 
 case, unless he had resigned his office, it was their 
 duty, and it could have done them no disservice, to 
 ask of him what was his opinion. A trait of such 
 gross brutality is disgraceful to the very name of 
 England. The prince regent will read of it with 
 horror ; judging from those noblemen who have 
 been most about his person, he will find it difficult 
 to believe that any one of that rank should have 
 been so indifferent to decent manners, so insensible 
 to common humanity. He may listen to some 
 excuses for the deserter of his party, none will he 
 endure for the deserter of his friend. He will 
 never employ such wretches. We shall owe to the 
 exposure of their hearts what the exposure of their 
 intellect solicited in vain. 
 
 It is delightful to turn from these hard-featured, 
 dry, afjivr)va Kapyva, 1 towards the benevolent 
 author of the Memoirs. His feelings, at times, 
 give him all the air and character of genius. A 
 pure and energetic warmth elevates his imagination 
 when he describes his friend gazing on the berries 
 of the mountain-ash, from the window at Chiswick. 
 The description is not unworthy of Rousseau. 
 
 [Page 450. " A few days before the termination 
 of his mortal career, he said to me at night, ' Holland 
 thinks me worse than I am ' ; and, in fact, the 
 appearances were singularly delusive, not a week 
 before he expired. In the day he arose, and walked 
 
 Kaprjva. HOMER, Odyssey, xi. 29.
 
 FAREWELL TO NATURE 225 
 
 a little, and his looks were not ghastly or alarming 
 by any means. Often did he latterly walk to his 
 window to gaze on the berries of the mountain-ash, 
 which hung clustering on a young tree at Chiswick 
 House : every morning, he returned to look at it ; 
 he would praise it, as the morning breeze rustling 
 shook the berries and leaves. . . . His last look on 
 that mountain-ash was his farewell to nature."] 
 
 Page 467. " [Mr. Fox expired between five and 
 six in the afternoon of the 13th of September.] The 
 Tower guns were firing for the capture of Buenos 
 Ayres l as he was breathing his last." 
 
 A capture not less deplorable, and hardly less 
 disgraceful, than our subsequent defeat. 
 
 1 General Beresford entered the city of Buenos Ayres on June 27, 
 1806. Despatches announcing the capture of the city reached England 
 early in September. On September 20, The Annual Register says, the 
 treasure captured from the Spanish settlement was brought to town in 
 eight waggons, on each of which was a Jack Tar holding a flag 
 inscribed with the word <e Treasure." The waggons were escorted by 
 the Loyal Britons, commanded by Colonel A. Davison, the rear being 
 brought up by the Clapham Volunteers. 
 
 29
 
 CHAPTER XIII 
 
 SOME LETTERS FROM C. J. FOX 
 
 The Peace of Amiens Homer's Iliad Poets of the sea Virgil and 
 Metastasio Advice to a law student Blackstone's Commentaries 
 Robertson's style Adam Smith's Moral Sentiments Goldsmith 
 Dr. Johnson Scholarship in France Bonaparte and men of 
 learning Ignorance of Greek Euripides Shakespeare's Caliban 
 Supernatural in poetry Allegory Plato Collins and Shen- 
 stone Thomson's Castle of Indolence. 
 
 [C. J. Fox to J. B. Trottw 
 
 ST. ANNE'S HILL, Oct. 19, 1801. 
 
 "... You will, of course, have been rejoiced at 
 the peace, 1 as we all are. ... I think this place 
 has looked more beautiful than ever this year, both 
 in spring and summer, and so it does now 
 in autumn. I have been very idle about my 
 History ', but I will make up for it by and bye ; 
 though I believe I must go to Paris, to look at 
 some papers there, before I can finish the first 
 volume. ..." 
 
 " I think in the last half of the Iliad you will 
 admire the 16th, 20th, 22nd, and 24th books 
 particularly.] I believe the general opinion is that 
 Homer did write near the sea-shore." Memoirs, 
 p. 497. 
 
 1 The preliminaries of peace between England and France were 
 signed in London, by Lord Hawkesbury and M. Otto, on Oct. 1, 1801. 
 The definitive treaty was signed at Amiens in March, 1802. 
 
 226
 
 SOME POETS AND A LAWYER 227 
 
 Virgil, too, is fond of describing scenes of the sea 
 and sea-shore ; but Metastasio is the poet for seas. 
 He has turned more than a dozen of them into his 
 airs. We have hardly a metaphor or a simily 
 without a sea. 
 
 [C. J. Fox to J. B. Trotter 
 
 HOTEL RICHELIEU, PARIS, Oct. 28, 1802. 
 
 " . . . I suppose you will now go in earnest to 
 law. I do not know much of the matter, but 
 I suspect that a regular attendance (and with 
 attention) to the courts, is still more important 
 than any reading whatever ; ] you of course read 
 Blackstone over and over again ; and if so," etc. 
 Memoirs, p. 512. 
 
 After of course there is no room for if so ; but 
 to proceed. 
 
 "Pray tell me whether you agree with me 
 in thinking his style * of English the very best 
 among our modern writers, always easy and in- 
 telligible, far more correct than Hume, and less 
 studied and made up than Robertson." 2 
 
 This last writer is very finical in style, but there 
 always is clearness in the narrative, and good sense 
 
 1 Speaking in the House of Commons on March 3, 1806, Fox said 
 of Blackstone : " His purity of style I particularly admire. He is 
 distinguished as much for simplicity and strength as any writer in the 
 English language." 
 
 * Pressed by Boswell for his opinion of Robertson's History of Scotland, 
 Dr. Johnson said : (< Sir, I love Robertson, and I won't talk of his 
 book." On another occasion he said: "Sir, if Robertson's style be 
 faulty, he owes it to me : that is, having too many words, and those big 
 ones."
 
 228 SOME LETTERS FROM C. J. FOX 
 
 in the observations. He never is great. Through- 
 out all the extensive regions he has traversed, the 
 footstep of genius is nowhere to be traced. The 
 Scotch authors are not contented with English ; 
 they want something better. No work is so 
 totally made up of what are called rounded 
 sentences as Adam Smith's Theory of Moral 
 Sentiments. If his wisdom could not withstand 
 such meretricious allurements, how could we ex- 
 pect more firmness and resistance in Robertson ? 
 Of all modern historians, Davila * has most genius, 
 usually so called ; a dangerously high quality in 
 their department. 
 
 I love Goldsmith. The poet never transgresses 
 into the province of the historian. There is 
 nothing profound or important in him ; but his 
 language is gracefully familiar, every thing about 
 him is sufficiently correct and well-placed, his 
 style is polished enough, and he invites us by an 
 ingenuous and frank simplicity. Johnson in his 
 Lives of the Poets, Goldsmith, Blackstone, and 
 Sir Joshua Reynolds, are the best of our later 
 prose-writers. Harris, 2 Warton, 3 etc., etc., disgust 
 
 1 In the Imaginary Conversations Marvel compares Davila with Bacon, 
 saying that they were the only men of high genius among the moderns 
 who had attempted historical composition. LANDOR, Works, v. 47. 
 Davila's Istoria della Guerre Civile was translated into English, in the 
 seventeenth century, by W. Aylesbury and C. Cotterell. 
 
 * James Harris (1709-1780) author of Hermes. 
 
 3 Joseph Warton, see below, p. 232, is probably referred to, not his 
 young brother, Thomas, Poet Laureate in 1785.
 
 THE DECAY OF SCHOLARSHIP 229 
 
 by their frippery and affectation even those whom 
 their reading could have instructed. 
 
 [From the same letter 
 
 "It is a pity you did not see, while you were 
 here, Villerson, the great Grecian, if it were only 
 for the purpose of knowing how fast it is possible 
 for the human voice to go without indistinctness. 
 1 believe he could recite the whole Iliad in four 
 hours."] 
 
 Page 512. In Mr. Fox's letter from Paris, 
 Villoison 1 is called Villerson. He is one of the 
 few remaining scholars now resident in France. 
 Those who know little of him, and do not think it 
 important to know much, will find him mentioned 
 in Wyttenbach's life of Ruhnken. 2 Scholarship is 
 so extremely low in his country that, out of near 
 seventy bishops, I was informed, only three were 
 supposed to be capable of construing the Greek 
 
 1 Jean Baptiste Gaspard d'Ansse de Villoison (1750-1806), Greek 
 scholar and member of the French Institute. He edited the Pastoraf 
 of Longus with "a superfluity of erudition/' and a tenth-century MS. 
 of Homer, which he found in the Library of St. Mark's, Venice. 
 Bonaparte created for him a professorship of ancient and modern 
 Greek in the College of France, but he died soon afterwards. Compare 
 Landor, Works, iv. 40 : " Latterly we have seen only Villoison and 
 Larcher fairly escape from the barbarous ignorance around them." 
 
 * Wyttenbachii, Vita Ruhnkenii, Lugd. Bat., 1799. Mark Pattison, 
 in his Life of Casaubon, referred to Wyttenbach, Ruhnkeu, and Bentley 
 as rare examples, in the eighteenth century, of consummate learning ; 
 but Ruhnken's name may be better known from Person's verses : 
 "I went to Strasburg, where I got drunk, 
 With that most learned professor Brunk ; 
 I went to Wortz and got more drunken 
 With that more learned professor Ruhnkeu."
 
 230 SOME LETTERS FROM C. J. FOX 
 
 testament. Yet Bonaparte had taken all measures 
 to collect men of some learning. Under the old 
 government no knowledge of Greek was thought 
 necessary ; but the chief Consul, though contented 
 with those who enjoyed the reputation of general 
 good conduct, would gladly have promoted men of 
 literature to the vacant sees. At the time I am 
 speaking of, 1 I believe there were near seventy. It 
 was the October before the renewal of hostilities 
 when I heard the fact mentioned, by a person from 
 whom I received some assistance, and many civilities, 
 in the national library ; that there were only three 
 who had received such instruction as every boy of 
 liberal education, in our country, has acquired at 
 the age of fourteen, appeared strange to me, and 
 the exact number has been impressed more indelibly 
 on my memory. 2 
 
 [C. J. Fox to J. B. Trotter 
 
 ST. ANNE'S HILL, Friday. 
 
 "... I am very glad you prefer Euripides to 
 Sophocles, because it is my taste ; though I am not 
 sure that it is not thought a heresy. . . . Though 
 
 1 October, 1802. Landor was then staying in Paris. 
 
 * <c When Calvinism was making a progress in France, the Catholic 
 bishops were learned men ; indeed, so learned that Joseph Scaliger, 
 himself a Calvinist, acknowledged, in the latter part of his life, their 
 immense superiority over the rising sect. At present there is only one 
 bishop in France capable of reading a chapter in the Greek testament, 
 which every schoolboy in England, for whatever profession he is 
 designed, must do at eleven years of age." LANDOB, Imaginary 
 Conversation?, 1824, i. 221.
 
 the two plays J of Euripides which you have read, 
 are undoubtedly among his best, I will venture to 
 assure you that there are four others you will like 
 full as well : Medea., Phcenissce, HeracKdce, and 
 Akestis\ with the last of which, if I know any 
 thing of your taste, you will be enchanted. . . . 
 Orestes and Andromache are, in my judgment, the 
 worst. 1 have not mentioned Rhesus and Cyclops* 
 because the former is not thought to be really 
 Euripides's, and the latter is entirely comic, or 
 rather a very coarse farce ; excellent, however, in 
 its way, and the conception of the character not 
 unlike that of Shakespeare's Caliban. Memoirs, 
 p. 516.] 
 
 " The character of the Cyclops in Euripides is 
 not unlike that of Caliban in Shakespeare." I 
 could not help making the same remark, in some 
 observations on the properties and signs of inven- 
 tion. The character of the Cyclops is broad and 
 general, that of Caliban is peculiar and unique ; it 
 is admirably conceived and equally well-sustained 
 throughout. What I most applaud in it are the 
 feelings with which Shakespeare has endowed the 
 creature. Another poet would have represented 
 him as spiteful and malicious, and perhaps without 
 any reason for his being so, but Shakespeare has 
 made the infringement of his idleness the origin 
 of his malice. He has also made him grateful ; 
 but then his gratitude is the return for an 
 
 1 Hippolytus Crowned and Iphigenia in A ulis.
 
 232 SOME LETTERS FROM C. J. FOX 
 
 indulgence of his evil appetites. Those who by 
 nature are grateful, are also by nature vindictive ; 
 one of these properties is the sense of kindness, 
 the other of unkindness. But religion, and 
 habit, and comfort, require that the one should 
 be cherished, and that the other should be 
 supprest. 1 
 
 The mere conception of such a monster as 
 Caliban, without these opposite qualities, without 
 the sudden impressions which bring them vividly 
 out, and the circumstances in which they are 
 displayed would not be, to considerate minds, so 
 stupendous as it appeared to Joseph Warton, 
 who little knew that nil admirari is as requisite 
 to wisdom as to happiness. 
 
 No new fiction of a supernatural being exists 
 in poetry. Hurd 2 traced the genealogical descent 
 of the faeries, etc., etc., and fancied he made a fine 
 discovery. The sylphs have only another name. 
 Dragons, and wizards, and witches, and giants, 
 are powerful agents ; but they generally prove 
 the imbecility of the writer who has any thing 
 to do with them. Dreams, perhaps, first produced 
 such images, superstition presented them with 
 attributes, and the poet brought all into action. 
 
 1 Portions of this and the following paragraph were afterwards 
 incorporated in the Imaginary Conversation between Landor and the 
 Abbe' Delille. See Works, iv. 130. 
 
 2 Richard Hurd, Bishop of Worcester (died 1808), in his Letters on 
 Chivalry and Romance,
 
 ALLEGORICAL WRITERS 233 
 
 A few writers have indulged in allegory who 
 have not been deficient in genius ; for instance, 
 it is in allegory, and there alone, that Addison 
 has any ; delicacy of humour, in which he also is 
 eminent, can hardly lay claim to such a quality. 
 Plato, in addition to almost every other talent, 
 possessed one for allegory, but he would not have 
 founded a poem on it, nor have permitted it to 
 superabound in one. It manifests a want of higher 
 invention, and those poets who have indulged in 
 it have shown but little taste or fancy in any 
 thing else, have seldom reached the sublime, and 
 more seldom the pathetic. Collins l comes nearest 
 of all to an exception, but though he excels the 
 other allegorical poets in delicacy and proportions, 
 he appears to greatest advantage when he has 
 escaped from the trammels of this perverted 
 taste. The stanza of Spenser is truly delightful, 
 and there seems to be something creative in 
 its harmony. Shenstone, 2 a poor poet in other 
 things, becomes an admirable one in The School- 
 mistress. The languor of Thomson is graceful 
 in The Castle of Indolence, and his redundancy 
 is kept within some bounds by the stanza. 
 
 It is better to leave off where reflection may 
 rest than where passion may be excited, and it 
 
 1 Landor thought Collins's Hassan excellent, but " surpassed by 
 Burns and Scott." Works, viii. 378. 
 
 1 "Shenstone, when he forgot his Strephons and Corydons, and 
 followed Spenser, became a poet." LANDOR, Works, iv. 187. 
 
 30
 
 234 SOME LETTERS FROM C. J. FOX 
 
 is soothing to take the last view of politics from 
 amongst the works of imagination : 
 
 Despicere unde queas alios passimque videre 
 Errare, atque viam palenteis quaerere vitae. 1 
 
 An escape, in this manner, from the mazes of 
 politics and the discord of party, leaves such 
 sensations on the heart as are experienced by 
 the disinterested and sober man after some public 
 meeting, when he has quitted the crowded and 
 noisy room, the crooked and narrow streets, the 
 hisses and huzzas of the rabble, poor and rich, 
 and enters his own grounds again, and meets, 
 his own family at the gate. 
 
 1 Lucretius, De Rerum Nat., ii. 9.
 
 CHAPTER XIV 
 
 POSTSCRIPT 
 
 The Right Hon. George Rose Defaulting members of Parliament 
 Portuguese Royal family Flight to Brazil South America Irish 
 Attorney-General Legal cruelty Italian vivisectionists Spallau- 
 zani and Fontana Jeffreys and Scroggs The Laws of England. 
 
 I 
 
 IT might be expected that I should say something 
 of Mr. Rose's book. 1 I leave him, however, where 
 I found him, and where Mr. Fox too, I am certain, 
 would have left him. The King has been graciously 
 pleased to distinguish him by the title of right 
 honourable ; I should probably have distinguished 
 him by one very different, and certainly much 
 more lasting. But it would have been an un- 
 worthy and most idle business ; for it is only on 
 soft and miry ground that such creatures can leave 
 any impression. Their impetuous attack is not 
 courage, but stupidity, and their dissonant clamour 
 is not for our security, but for their own voracious 
 and insatiable appetite. Perhaps it might be cruel 
 
 1 Observations on the Historical Work of C. J, Fox, by the Rt. Hou. 
 George Rose, 1809. Rose, who was Treasurer of the Navy in the Duke 
 of Portland's administration, and held the same office under Perceval, 
 was appointed to the Privy Council in January, 1802. 
 
 235
 
 236 POSTSCRIPT 
 
 to break the neck they stretch out so angrily and 
 so awkwardly, yet it would be a piece of good 
 husbandry to pluck them well, and to turn them 
 up again on their common. 
 
 If to attack the opinions or the conduct of 
 Mr. Fox requires the help of distortion, of mis- 
 quotation, of falsehood, I leave it to those 
 right honourables whom Mr. Pitt raised up from 
 obscurity, and cherished for their obliquity and 
 baseness, and placed on benches where a little 
 more dirtiness would be indifferent and imper- 
 ceptible. I never thought Mr. Fox a very power- 
 ful man, unless a readiness and aptitude in debate 
 can constitute it ; but no man whatever is powerful 
 enough to make me a liar. If I am less than 
 another, by nature or by misfortune, be it so ; but 
 never let me afford to the vicious an advantage 
 he could not have taken. He who wishes to avoid 
 a blow may stoop, but he who strikes must not ; 
 and no living soul ever yet rose up from a false- 
 hood with the same activity and strength which 
 he enjoyed before. Mr. Rose may be considered, 
 at least by his party, as a perfectly honest man, 
 and I have no inclination to meddle with his 
 integrity, but I must observe that it is quite as 
 easy to make a mistake in the complex accounts 
 of revenue, as in the simple and progressive figures 
 which denote the regular pages of every common 
 book. If any thing is put down, or erased, or
 
 HONOUR OF PARLIAMENT 237 
 
 added wrong in the one case, it may also in the 
 other, by the same person ; and we have seen 
 several instances, lately, where members of the 
 honourable house have actually fallen into this 
 error. Some, after their misfortune, have proposed 
 to retire into Wales, some into Portugal, some 
 into America ; others are not yet willing to remove 
 their stake from the country, and continue in the 
 full enjoyment of their places and their authority. 1 
 I hope I shall always be blessed with sufficient 
 loyalty to acknowledge the power of precedent; 
 and when I consider the actions of the charitable 
 corporation, in the reign of George II., 2 and the 
 countenance which was shown to the greater part 
 of the defaulters by their honourable friends, I 
 think it an unjust, and perhaps an unlawful act, 
 to bear hardly upon those who have vacated their 
 seats by the persecution of fortune, whether they 
 go to enjoy the Christmas convivialities of Wales, 
 or their affairs call them into the United States, 
 or their health requires the temperature of Lisbon ; 
 and I applaud the firmness and consistency, and 
 right feeling, of the present parliament, in not 
 
 1 Joseph Hunt, M.P., late Treasurer of the Board of Ordnance, was 
 expelled from the House in 1810, in consequence of the disclosures 
 made in the twelfth report of the Commissioners of Military Inquiry. 
 He had already left, on plea of ill health, for Lisbon. 
 
 2 Infamous malversation was detected in the Charitable Corporation, 
 formed for the relief of the industrious poor by small loans at legal 
 interest. The Corporation, in some cases, took 10 per cent., and 
 advanced large sums on goods obtained on credit by fraudulent specu- 
 lators. STANHOPE'S History of England, ii. 150.
 
 238 POSTSCRIPT 
 
 rejecting any member from its bosom for the 
 denunciations either of the people or the laws. 
 
 If, after all, it appears to any that I have written 
 elsewhere with acrimony, let him consider whether 
 it proceeded not naturally from the subject ; 
 whether the juices were not produced by the 
 soil, rather than by the hook and harrow. It is 
 only a starved or pusillanimous genius that is 
 driven to a defence ; enough is it for me that there 
 never was a bad man whom I have not treated as 
 a bad man, nor a good whom I have not treated 
 as a good. Were such the sentiment and de- 
 meanour of all who aspire to any rank in literature, 
 and possess any in society, more effectual benefit 
 would result to the cause of virtue, than from all 
 the laws and institutions of mankind. The sources 
 of evil lie in the higher regions of the moral world, 
 and the stream descends wider and fouler to the 
 last. If a person who committed any kind of base 
 action was not received and countenanced by 
 people of his own rank and condition, he would 
 not easily find his way further. He would be like 
 a misshapen rock whose support had given way, and 
 which had been precipitated to the bottom of a 
 mountain, where, having lost by its fall whatever was 
 romantic in its form, or colour, or elevation, a strong 
 earthern fence stopped its progress, and where the 
 husbandman thanked God that it had not desolated 
 his house, or swept away the fruits of his industry.
 
 SOUTH AMERICAN PATRIOTS 239 
 
 II 
 
 By the part we are now taking in foreign 
 politics, it is much to be apprehended that the 
 queen of Portugal, 1 whom heaven has deprived 
 of her intellects, and the prince of Brazil, to 
 whom they certainly have not been transferred,, 
 may, by the rashness and insolence of their 
 ministers, and by that insensibility to shame and 
 honour, from which fugitives and outcasts never 
 quite recover, be delivered into the hands of the 
 patriots. Many in South America would forget 
 the causes of their indignation, on seeing the old 
 woman and her infante, first presenting grimaces 
 to the drummer boys, and afterwards a suit of 
 embroidery to the executioner and his mistress. 
 This is horrible to me, who believe that the 
 infliction of stripes on women is the most certain 
 and execrable criterion of barbarism, and who, 
 however much I admire the Roman institutions, 
 think those punishments superfluous and cruel 
 which preceded their capital punishments ; who 
 even think that these punishments should be 
 very rare indeed, and inflicted only on powerful 
 offenders, such as have subverted or endangered 
 the constitutions it was their duty and office to 
 protect. It is horrible to those who have never 
 suffered by their neighbour's ambition, or by their 
 
 1 On November 29, 1807, the Portuguese royal family, under the 
 protection of Sir Sidney Smith, had left Lisbon for Brazil.
 
 240 POSTSCRIPT 
 
 ruler's fatuity ; but those who have seen foreigners 
 invade their territory, and militate against their 
 independence, will not perhaps call a people 
 excessively vindictive in exposing the person and 
 sacrificing the life of one or two principal culprits, 
 such as infamously stood aloof from danger, and 
 scattered every where around them death and 
 desolation. Perhaps the people of Buenos Ayres 
 may mistake this most faithful majesty and this 
 most apostolic prince for some such agitators and 
 disturbers of the public peace, and, judging the 
 crime, not the rank (a truly revolutionary error), 
 leave a memorable lesson, to all such persons, 
 how they interfere with the concerns of a great 
 and gallant people, determined to assert its inde- 
 pendence, and able to defend its rights. 
 
 Ill 
 
 I have lately read, in a history of Irish affairs, 
 written since Dr. Curry published his Review of 
 the Civil Wars in Ireland, 1 which work presents 
 also an admirable synopsis of legal transactions 
 there, an account of an attorney general, 2 who 
 brought gentlemen of the first respectability to 
 
 1 An Historical and Critical Review of the Civil Wars in Ireland, etc., 
 by J. Curry, M.D., new edition, 1810. 
 
 * Southey's letters (see Introduction) make it clear that Landor was 
 referring to William Saurin, appointed Irish Attorney-General in 1807. 
 Landor, however, unwilling to risk a charge of libel, is not very explicit 
 either as to his authorities or to his allegations. His attack on Saurin 
 may have been suggested by the trial of Dr. Edward Sheridan, prosecuted 
 in 1811 under the provisions of the Convention Act of 1793.
 
 TYRANNY OF THE LAW 241 
 
 trial, when, according to his own confession, he 
 believed them to be perfectly innocent of all the 
 charges, and wanted only to prove the validity 
 of an unconstitutional and most tyrannical law. 
 Surely this is going rather further than Jeffreys, 
 or Scroggs, or Finch, or Page, whom we have 
 always considered as the most iniquitous men on 
 record ; for they at least pretended that their 
 victims were guilty, and had offended against a 
 known, a positive, an established law. The amaze- 
 ment and horror he perceived on the countenances 
 of his audience, sent him staggering into perjury. 
 He denied his own acknowledgment, although 
 several shorthand writers had taken down every 
 word. Happily for us, there is no danger of any 
 such man appearing, in that or this country, in 
 the present times. 
 
 This lawyer must surely be a more impudent 
 man than ever appeared at the bar before, in any 
 capacity whatsoever, and, in understanding, must 
 
 be far below 
 
 That blockhead Betsworth, 
 Though half a crown overpaid his sweat's worth, 1 
 
 1 "In a satire printed in 1773, ridiculing the Dissenters for pretend- 
 ing to the title of 'Brother Protestants and Christians/ the Dean 
 [Swift], among other ludicrous illustrations of their presumption, 
 introduced the simile : 
 
 ' Thus at the bar the booby B , 
 
 Though half a crown o'erpays his sweat's worth, 
 Who knows in law nor text nor margent, 
 Calls Singleton his brother sergeant.' " 
 
 Bettesworth, M.P. and serjeant-at-law, was notorious for his florid 
 elocution. See Swift's Works, ed. Sir Walter Scott, i. 418. 
 
 31
 
 242 POSTSCRIPT 
 
 who has received his viaticum long ago from the 
 memorable dean of St. Patrick's. 
 
 On another occasion he said, "he would not 
 answer to any accusation which charged him 
 with abuse of authority, because the public had 
 sufficient pledges in his conscience and oath, and 
 in his rank and situation." 
 
 Silly booby ! as if rank and situation were 
 pledges against abuse of authority ; when, on the 
 contrary, without rank and situation there can 
 be no authority at all ; when, indeed, it is this 
 authority itself which constitutes the rank and 
 situation. These three, clearly enough, are one. 
 Take away the authority, and the situation is past 
 discovery; take away the rank, and the person 
 who loses it loses also the authority. Pledges 
 ought to be weighty and valid in proportion to 
 the quantity and activity of authority which may 
 possibly bear against us ; but they cannot be given 
 from out of this quantity, etc. To say that the 
 authority, which alone can commit the abuse 
 complained of, is in itself a pledge against itself, 
 would be a grosser piece of stupidity than the 
 most benighted blunderer could stumble on " in 
 bog and fen ! " It requires a very profound 
 ignorance of human intellect, and a very pro- 
 found contempt of what is lovely and august 
 in moral sentiment, to cover the most hideous 
 iniquity with nothing but the most flimsy false-
 
 ATROCIOUS PROSECUTION 243 
 
 hoods. We do not weigh exactly, and by the 
 scruple, how much may be reposed on the con- 
 science and oath of a person who brings to trial, 
 and bids the jury to condemn, those whom he 
 declared he believed not guilty, at the very time 
 he was arraigning them ; but if we place his oath 
 and conscience in the lump, against the oath and 
 conscience of any pilloried perjurer in the three 
 kingdoms, we shall find the latter character the 
 less infamous and detestable ; for it is certain that 
 no one of this description has, by any false oath, 
 by any malevolence, by any hope of profit or 
 promotion, laid such a dark and combustible 
 train for the consternation and explosion of his 
 fellow citizens. He was confident of their in- 
 nocence, and accused them only for experiment 1 
 Spallanzani 1 has been thought cruel, and justly 
 too, for putting bats to excruciating pain, in order 
 to try whether they could escape his nets and 
 narrow threads without their eyes ; and so has 
 been Fontana, 2 who inflicted on some thousand 
 animals the venom of the viper, to remark on 
 which, and in what quantities, and under what 
 irritation, it was deadly ; but this atrocious wretch 
 involves his own fellow creatures, fellow citizens, 
 school-fellows, next-door neighbours, in the toils 
 of law, which he bids their inveterate enemies 
 
 1 Lazarus Spallanzani (1729-1799), Italian naturalist. 
 
 1 Felix Fontaua (1730-1805), Italian naturalist and philosopher.
 
 244 POSTSCRIPT 
 
 pull tight, in order to try whether the materials 
 are strong, and whether those whom he encloses 
 will survive. After such actions as these, his 
 pledges of oath and conscience, with all their 
 tawdriness of ostentation, are such vile and worth- 
 less things as no pawnbroker in the suburbs would 
 give a token for ; and as to his claim of confidence 
 from situation and rank, let us only look back, to 
 save trouble, on those lawyers of past ages whose 
 example I have cited. They possessed the same 
 situation, the same principles, with infinitely more 
 acuteness and discretion. They joked over their 
 bottle, they enjoyed their witticisms ; yet were 
 they nefarious and blood-thirsty villains ; they 
 had a law for every occasion but justice, and had 
 a speech for every day but the day of retribution. 
 It is because men like these possess rank and 
 situation, that we demand some pledge for our 
 security. A pickpocket could not throw me into 
 prison for thirty years, or make me pay thirty 
 pounds, before he would listen to my defence, or 
 even force me to a defence in court, unless a 
 jury had found a true bill against me ; yet I 
 might have grievously offended this said pick- 
 pocket, both by resisting him in the exercise of 
 his occupation, and by calling him what he would 
 rather be than be called. Against a pickpocket we 
 have, or ought to have, something of a security ; 
 how much rather then against men infinitely
 
 THE JUDGMENT TO COME 245 
 
 more dexterous in their fraudulence, infinitely more 
 violent in the detection of it, who encounter no 
 danger in committing their atrocities, no difficulty 
 in defending them, but in whom, on the contrary, 
 every act of violence is loyal zeal, and every uncon- 
 stitutional maxim is legal perspicacity. Miserable 
 men ! Suppose, for the sake of argument, that the 
 affairs of our country are conducted with such 
 wisdom that there is not the remotest danger of 
 any change unfavourable to you ; that our strength 
 is imperishable, that our resources are inexhaustible ; 
 that there are no beings more wise, more energetic 
 than you ; that the tide of genius must always 
 be confined in narrow straits, and run under, and 
 run counter to, the tide of fortune ; yet the flatter- 
 ing unction which you are laying to your souls 
 will not render them invulnerable long. Ye must 
 all, in a few years at the furthest, lose your " rank 
 and situation " ; but your " consciences " will not 
 be taken from you, nor will the resignation, though 
 very, very voluntary, be accepted. The fear of 
 God, so salutary when it mingles with every 
 thought and action, and is inhaled with every 
 breath from the cradle to the grave, is dreadful 
 when it rushes on a mortal all at once, and closes 
 the dying hour. 
 
 THE END
 
 INDEX 
 
 ABELARD and Heloise, in Pope, 
 49 ; monument of, 191. 
 
 Achilles, Homer's, 134, 136 ; the 
 shield of, 149. 
 
 Adair, Sir Robert, xxi, 217. 
 
 Addison, Joseph, xi, 213 ; his 
 tragedy of Cato, 136 ; failure as 
 a poet, 136 ; his allegories, 233. 
 
 jEneas, Virgil's, 137. 
 
 .iEschylus, compared with Euri- 
 pides and Sophocles, 157. 
 
 Agamemnon, Homer's, 134. 
 
 Agathocles, 174. 
 
 Aguilar, in Spain, 182. 
 
 Alexandria, 114, 126 ; General 
 Mackenzie Frazer's Expedition 
 to, 63 n. 
 
 Alexandrine metre in French, 
 165. 
 
 Alfieri, 155, 171 ; superior to 
 Euripides, 158. 
 
 Alfred the Great, 77- 
 
 Allegory, 233. 
 
 America, North, 7, 10 ; war with, 
 xii, xvi, 8, 80. 
 
 America, South, 10, 239 ; English 
 designs in, 19 n., 62,68. 
 
 Amiens, Peace of, 94, 226 n. 
 
 Amsterdam, 122. 
 
 Antinous, 194. 
 
 Antiphlogistic philosophers, 161. 
 
 Antonius, Marcus, 60, 137. 
 
 Antwerp, 113-5. 
 
 Arabian Nights, The, 143. 
 
 Ariosto, C. J. Fox on, 148 ; 
 compared with Alfieri, 165 ; 
 with Boccaccio, 152 ; with 
 Homer, Virgil, Ovid, and Spen- 
 ser, 148, 149, 151, 152 ; Orlando 
 
 Furioso, 148, 151-4 ; fore 
 shadows the French Revolution, 
 151 ; pathetic passages in, 
 153. 
 
 Aristides ' ' the Just," 49. 
 
 Aristophanes, 157 ; Burns com- 
 pared with, 215. 
 
 Aristotle, 123, 146. 
 
 Atlantes, Palace of, in Ariosto, 
 151. 
 
 Atterbury, Bishop Francis, on The 
 Arabian Nights, 143 n. 
 
 Austria, 39, 62. 
 
 Aylmer, Admiral Frederick, sixth 
 Baron, 182 n. 
 
 Aylmer, the Hon. Rose, I78n., 
 182 n. 
 
 BACON, Lord, 77. 
 
 Balance of Power in Europe, 37, 
 39. 
 
 Barillon, Henri de, French Am- 
 bassador, 54. 
 
 Barker, Thomas, painter, 169. 
 
 Barras, Paul Fra^ois, 56, 59 n. 
 
 Beguines, at Ghent, 112-3. 
 
 Benwell, Rev. William, 220-2. 
 
 Beresford, General William (after- 
 wards Viscount), at Buenos 
 Ayres, 18n.,225. 
 
 Berne, Senate of and Bonaparte, 
 185. 
 
 Bettesworth, Sergeant, 241 n. 
 
 Bill of Rights, 40. 
 
 Blackmore, Sir Richard, physician 
 and poet, 213. 
 
 Blackstone, Sir William, 47 n., 
 227-8 ; his Commentaries, 123. 
 
 Blake, Admiral Robert, 77. 
 
 247
 
 248 
 
 INDEX 
 
 Blake, Joachim, Spanish general, 
 xxi, 182. 
 
 Boccaccio, compared with Ariosto, 
 152. 
 
 Bolingbroke, Henry St. John, 
 Viscount, 81 n. 
 
 Bonaparte, Napoleon, 7, 9, 27, 
 29, 36, 62, 162 ; C. J. Fox and, 
 56, 98, 177, 178, 192-4; his 
 predominant passions, 25 ; and 
 the slave trade, 64 ; the war 
 with, 89 ; and the invasion of 
 England, 110 ; requisite to 
 France, 140 ; fitness to govern, 
 163 ; and Lord Whitworth, 178 ; 
 men of learning under, 230. 
 
 Borgia, Caesar, 174. 
 
 Bourbons, The, 11, 97. 
 
 Brazil, Dom John, Prince of, 
 239. 
 
 Breda, 116. 
 
 Brest, British Fleet off, 182. 
 
 Brissot, Jean P., 56. 
 
 Brooke, Charlotte, 87. 
 
 Browning, Robert, Lander's verses 
 on, 212 n. 
 
 Brunswick, Charles John Ferdi- 
 nand, Duke of, 181. 
 
 Brutus, 44, 50. 
 
 Buckingham, Second Duke of, 
 author of The Rehearsal, 213. 
 
 Buenos Ayres, Expedition to, 18 n., 
 19 n., 63, 126, 240 ; Canning on, 
 19 n. ; capture and loss of, 225. 
 
 Burdett, Sir Francis, 103-4. 
 
 Burke, Edmund, 61 n. ; an English- 
 man, 87 ; on the French Revo- 
 lution, 142. 
 
 Burns, Robert, 48, 214; com- 
 pared with Shakespeare, 215. 
 
 Bute, John, third Earl of, 71, 
 77 n 
 
 CABARRUS, Madame, ci-devant 
 
 Tallien, 191. 
 
 aesar, C. Julius, 24, 44, 50, 96 ; 
 ' and the senate, 46 ; his verses 
 
 on Terence, 217, 219 n. 
 Caliban, Shakespeare's, 231. 
 Cambaceres, Jean Jacques Regis 
 
 de (Duke of Parma), 27, 170. 
 Canning, George, xix, 19 n., 36 n., 
 
 61 ; on sinecures, 32 ; his duel 
 
 with Castlereagh, 36 n., 216; 
 
 Lander's verses on, 36., 217 ; 
 
 his attack on C. J. Fox, 215 ; 
 an extraordinary boy, 216. 
 
 Capital punishment, 34. 
 
 Carlisle, Sixth Earl of, 180 n. 
 
 Carthage and Rome, 88. 
 
 Castlereagh, Robert, Lord (after- 
 wards second Marquis of 
 Londonderry), on sinecures, 
 32 ; duel with Canning, 36 n. , 
 216. 
 
 Castruccio Castracani, Machia- 
 , velli's Life of, 100. 
 
 Catharine, Empress of Russia, 
 105, 173. 
 
 Cato, 44, 50, 96 ; in Lucau's 
 Pharsalia, 136. 
 
 Catullus, quoted, 55. 
 
 Cervantes and the romance writers, 
 154. 
 
 Charitable Corporation, The, 237. 
 
 Charlemagne, 175. 
 
 Charles II. of England, 96, 116. 
 
 Charles V., Emperor, 111-2. 
 
 Charles IV. of Spain, 138. 
 
 Chatham, General Lord, xv, 21, 
 22 n, 30, 36 n. 
 
 Chatham, Lord, xiii, 83 ; his view 
 of honour, 60 ; his greatness, 
 69, 70 ; his pension, 71 ; at 
 court, 71 ; " all romance," 72. 
 
 Chatterton, Thomas, 48, 214. 
 
 Chaucer, 215 ; venerated by C. J. 
 Fox, 211 ; an admirable poet, 
 212 ; his language, 212. 
 
 Chauvelin, Marquis de, 140 n. 
 
 Chili, Republic of, 10 n. 
 
 Chinese Empire, 9 ; poetry, 166. 
 
 Chiswick, C. J. Fox at, 223-4. 
 
 Cicero, Letters of, 50. 
 
 Claude Lorraine, 168. 
 
 Climate and painting, 169. 
 
 Cloncurry, Nicholas Lawless, first 
 Baron, 90. 
 
 Coalition ministries of 1783 and 
 1806, 83, 85 ; in Rome, 85. 
 
 Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, on 
 Dryden, 48 n. 
 
 Collins, William, 233. 
 
 Commodus, Roman Emperor, 22. 
 
 Condes of Spain, 160. 
 
 Constantinople, 63, 115, 126. 
 
 Correggio, neglected in France, 
 168. 
 
 Cortes, Hernando, 138. 
 
 Coruna, 182 ; Landor at, xxi.
 
 INDEX 
 
 249 
 
 Count Julian, a Tragedy, by W. S. 
 
 Landor, x, xxi. 
 Courier, newspaper, xxi, 53 n. 
 Cowper, William, 48, 214. 
 Crassus, Marcus, 140. 
 Crewe, Earl of, his copy of the 
 
 Commentary, viii, xxv. 
 Crewe, Mrs. (afterwards Lady), 
 
 56 n. ; Fox's verses to, 75 n, 
 Critical Review, The, 18 n., 146. 
 Criticism, errors of contemporary, 
 
 143-4. 
 
 Croker, John Wilson, xv. 
 Cromwell, Oliver, 28, 140. 
 Cumseans, Simplicity of the, 29. 
 Cumberland, Richard, 51. 
 Curran, J. P., 87. 
 Curry, Dr. J., Civil Wars in Ire- 
 land, 240. 
 Cyclops of Euripides, compared 
 
 with Shakespeare's Caliban, 
 
 231. 
 
 DANAE, Myth of, 163. 
 
 Dante, 154. 
 
 Dantzig, Capture of (1807), 62. 
 
 Dardanelles, Sir T. Duckworth's 
 
 expedition to, 63 n. 
 Darius, 63. 
 
 Darwin, Dr. Erasmus, 144-5. 
 Davila, Henrico Caterino, his 
 
 genius as a writer, 228. 
 Demosthenes, 45, 76 ; Fox and 
 
 Chatham compared with, 70. 
 Devonshire, Fifth Duke of, 222. 
 Diaz, Ruy, 138. 
 Dido, Virgil's, her passion true 
 
 to nature, 197- 
 
 Domitian, Roman Emperor, 73. 
 Douglas, Marquis of, afterwards 
 
 tenth Duke of Hamilton, 179 n. 
 Drake, Dr. Nathan, 146. 
 Dry Sticks, by W. S. Landor, 36 n. 
 Dryden, John, 47, 213; C. J. 
 
 Fox on, 48 ; Coleridge on, 48 n. ; 
 
 translation of Virgil, 132 ; 
 
 Johnson's Life of, 214. 
 Duckworth, Sir Thomas, 63 n. 
 Dukes, tempore George III., 46. 
 Dutch, The, 117 ; industry of, 119. 
 
 EDGEWORTH, Miss, 87. 
 Edinburgh Review, xx, 24 n., 75 n. 
 Egypt, English in, 63, 126. 
 Eldon, Lord, (Sir John Scott) 69 n. 
 
 Elizabeth, Queen, and the 
 
 Commonwealth, 203. 
 Emerson, Ralph Waldo, meeting 
 
 with Landor, 216 . 
 Erasmus, Letters of, xix. 
 Erskine, Thomas (afterwards 
 
 Lord), 192. 
 Euripides, admired by Fox, 156, 
 
 211, 230; compared with 
 
 Sophocles and JEschylus, 157. 
 Examiner, newspaper, 132 n., 
 
 207 n.; Landor's letter to, vii, 
 
 xxiii. 
 
 FACTORY labour, 120. 
 
 Fairies in literature, 232. 
 
 Fellowes, Dr. Robert, x, xv, 18 n., 
 146. 
 
 Fenestella, Lucius, 123. 
 
 Ferdinand VII. of Spain, xvii, 138. 
 
 Ferrol, Pulteuey's expedition to 
 (1800), 20. 
 
 Fielding, Henry, Joseph Andrews, 
 106, 110; Tom Jones, 116, 142, 
 143. 
 
 Finch, Baron, Chief Justice, 241. 
 
 Fisheries, 119, 121. 
 
 Fitzpatrick, General Richard, 99 n., 
 162 n., 210. 
 
 Flamank, Dr., 221. 
 
 Flanders, 105 ; people of, 106. 
 
 Folard, Chevalier de, 100. 
 
 Fontana, Felix, 243. 
 
 Forster, John, Walter Savage 
 Landor, a biography, ix n., 7 n. 
 132 . 
 
 Fox, Charles James, Landor on, 
 xxii ; a mutable statesman, 15, 
 79 ; and Hanover, 16, 54 ; in 
 the Privy Council, 16 ; and 
 South America, 17, 52 ; his 
 prophetic spirit, 1 8 ; speeches 
 quoted, 39 n., 61, 64 n. ; a 
 gambler, 45, 46, 66 ; his History 
 of James II., 46, 51, 52, 75, 
 94, 96 ; private letters, 50, 148, 
 149, 151, 156 ; his French pro- 
 clivities, 55, 56 ; a well-read 
 man, 65, 99 ; knowledge of 
 Italian literature, 55, 99, 155 ; 
 moral character, 56, 57, 73 ; 
 letter to the Westminster 
 electors, 61 . ; in private life, 
 74, 97, 126, 218, 219 ; ideas 
 of limited monarchy, 81 ; in 
 
 32
 
 250 
 
 INDEX 
 
 coalition ministries, 83, 85 ; and 
 Ireland, 86, 88, 92, 205, 206, 
 208 ; and the peerage, 91 ; 
 compared with Sallust, 95 ; on 
 the Continent, 95 et seq. ; at 
 St. Anne's Hill, 104, 111, 127, 
 210 ; his favourite passages in 
 Virgil, 127, 128, 139 ; on reli- 
 gion, 147 ; liking for Ariosto, 
 148, 150, 171 ; opinions on 
 Homer and Virgil, 156, 171 ; 
 meeting with Kosciusko, 172, 
 173 ; at Bonaparte's levee, 177, 
 192 ; conversation with Bona- 
 parte, 193 ; Lord Grenrille 
 and Fox, 199 ; admiration of 
 Chaucer, 211 ; attacked by 
 Canning, 215 ; Sheridan and 
 Fox, 218; death, 225; corre- 
 spondence with Trotter, 226- 
 231 
 
 Fox, Sir Stephen, 187. 
 
 Foxites, xix, 54, 109, 178. 
 
 France war with, 6, 40, 62, 89 ; 
 conquests of, 26 ; government 
 of, 58 ; the Netherlands and, 
 114. See "French." 
 
 Franco-Gallia, by F. Hoffman, 
 203 n. 
 
 Franklin, Benjamin, 77, 80 n, 
 
 Frazer, General Mackenzie, 63 n. 
 
 French, The, 28, 106 ; their hatred 
 of England, 109; the best 
 dancers and worst musicians, 
 171 ; unfit for self-government, 
 174. 
 
 French Directory, 59. 
 
 French marquises, 160. 
 
 French painters, 168. 
 
 French Revolution, The, 30, 46 ; 
 consequences of, 7 ; William 
 Pitt and, 38 ; foreshadowed by 
 Ariosto and Tasso, 161. 
 
 French theatre, 164-5. 
 
 GAINSBOROUGH, Thomas, 169. 
 Gay, John, The Beggar's Opera, 
 
 170 n. 
 Gebir, by W. S. Landor, xxi, 18n., 
 
 31 n. 
 
 George II., 16 n., 237. 
 George III. and the Dukes, 46 ; 
 
 character of, 80 ; dislike of Fox, 
 
 200. 
 Ghent, C. J. Fox at, 111. 
 
 Gibbon, Edward, on the Chevalier 
 
 de Folard, 101 n. 
 Gifford, William, xiii, xiv. 
 Gillray, James, caricature of Fox, 
 
 185 n. 
 
 Gladstone, W. E., 30 n. 
 Godeau, Antoine, Bishop of Vence, 
 
 Racine borrowed from, 166. 
 Goldsmith, Oliver, a political 
 
 quietist, 81 ; an Englishman, 
 
 87 J on fisheries, 121 n. ; and 
 
 contemporary criticism, 144 ; 
 
 praise of, 228. 
 
 Grattan, Henry, 87, 206, 208. 
 Gray, Thomas, 71 ', quoted, 1 69 n. ; 
 
 his contempt for Rousseau, 143. 
 Greece, Republics of, 122. 
 Greek, ignorance of in France, 
 
 229 
 Grenville, William, Lord (1759- 
 
 1834), his sinecure, 16, 17., 
 
 53 ; and the French Ambassador, 
 
 140, 141 ; and C. J. Fox, 198- 
 
 201 ; and George III., 203. 
 Grey, Sir Charles, first Earl 
 
 (1729-1807), in the West Indies, 
 
 39 n. 
 Grey, Charles (Lord Howick), 
 
 second Earl (1764-1845), xxii, 
 
 92 n., 203, 205,223. 
 Gustavus Adolphus, 112. 
 
 HALIFAX, Charles Montague, first 
 
 Earl of (1661-1715), 213. 
 Hallam, Henry, on Macbiavelli, 
 
 99 n. 
 
 Hamilton, Mrs., 87. 
 Hampden, John, 44, 77, 189. 
 Hanover, 62 ; Chatham and Fox 
 
 on, 16, 54. 
 Harris, James, author of Hermes, 
 
 228. 
 
 Hastings, Warren, xi, xiii. 
 Hawkesbury, Lord, afterwards 
 
 second Earl of Liverpool (1770- 
 
 1828), 61, 226 n. 
 "Heaven-born Minister," The, 
 
 30 n., 163. 
 
 Hector, Homer's, 134. 
 H6loise and Abelard, in Pope, 
 
 49 ; monument of, 191. 
 Heroic Idyls, by W. S. Landor, 
 
 231 n. 
 
 Hesiod, an indifferent poet, 149. 
 Hoche, General Lazare, 20 n.
 
 INDEX 
 
 251 
 
 Holland, 116-26. 
 
 Holland, Henry Vassal Fox, third 
 Baron, 164, 217, 224 ; his 
 Further Memoirs of the Whig 
 Party, 17., 21 n., 23.; his 
 preface to C. J. Fox's History, 
 46, 52, 55. 
 
 Homer, imitated by Virgil, 128 
 et seq. ; hy Lucretius, 132 ; 
 characters in the Odyssey, 134, 
 136 ; the Iliad, 135 ; incom- 
 parable, 135 ; superior to Virgil, 
 138 ; his contention with Hesiod, 
 149 ; C. J. Fox on, 156, 171 ; 
 sea pieces in, 226. 
 
 Horace, quoted, 173 n. ; Burns 
 compared with, 215. 
 
 Hotoman, F., author of Franco- 
 Gallia, 203 n. 
 
 Houghton, Lord, on Landor's 
 Commentary, viii, xx ; quoted, 
 24 n. 
 
 Howick, Lord. See "Grey." 
 
 Hoyle, Edmund, (1672-1769), on 
 Whist, 100. 
 
 Hume, David, his style, 47 . ; 
 contemporary critics on, 144. 
 
 Hunt, Joseph, M.P., 237 n. 
 
 Hunt, Leigh, 30 n. 
 
 Kurd, Bishop Richard, on Fairies, 
 232. 
 
 Hutchinson, John (1616-1664), 
 44. 
 
 Hyde Park, A Pantheon for, 77. 
 
 Imaginary Conversations, by W. S. 
 Landor, xiii, xxii, 91, 133, 
 156, 166, 172, 196, 232. 
 
 Ireland, 42, 240 ; and the Union, 
 86 et seq. ; C. J. Fox and, 86, 
 88, 92, 205, 206, 208 ; William 
 Pitt's treatment of, 90 ; com- 
 pared with Poland, 91. 
 
 Irish, the, English sympathies 
 with, 87 ; their mistakes, 206. 
 
 Irish peers of Pitt's creation, 90. 
 
 Irish writers, 87, 206. 
 
 Italian literature, 55, 99, 155 ; 
 painters, 169. 
 
 JAMES II., of England, 54. 
 
 Jeffreys, Judge, 241. 
 
 Jenkinson, Robert Banks. See 
 
 " Hawkesbury." 
 Jervis, Sir John, 39 n. 
 
 Johnson, Dr., and his critics, 
 144 ; Anna Seward and, 145 ; 
 on Robertson's History of Scot- 
 land, 227 n. ; his Lives of the 
 Poets, 228 ; of Dryden, 214. 
 
 Jortin, Dr. John, 133. 
 
 Joseph II., Emperor, 105, 173. 
 
 Joubert, Joseph, French general, 
 162. 
 
 Juvenal, 213. 
 
 KKTT, Rev. Henry, xv, 221 n. 
 Klopstock, preferred to Moliere, 
 
 219. 
 Kosciusko, 172-3. 
 
 LAFAYETTE, Marquis de, his im- 
 prisonment in Austria, 162 ; 
 meetings with C. J. Fox, 188, 
 191 n. 
 
 La Fontaine, Jean de, 166. 
 
 Landed gentry in England, 160. 
 
 Landor, Walter Savage, Quarterly 
 Review on, vii, xiv ; letters to 
 Southey, x et seq. ; letter to 
 Mr. John Murray, xviii ; at 
 Llanthony, xxi ; in Spain, xxi, 
 182 ; marriage, xxii ; Letters to 
 Lord Liverpool, xxiv, 38 n. , 59 n. , 
 lOOn. ; verses on Walcheren, 
 21 n. ; Letters, Private and Public, 
 31 n., 158 n. ; Apology for Satire, 
 34 n. ; Verses on Canning, 36 n., 
 217 ; translation from Virgil's 
 Georgics, 131 n. 
 
 Lauenburg, Francis Albert, Duke 
 of Saxe, 112. 
 
 Le Brun, Charles, 168. 
 
 Lecky, W. E. H., England in the 
 Eighteenth Century, quoted, 5 n. , 
 74 n., 99 n., 105 n. 
 
 Letters of a Conservative, by W. S. 
 Laudor, 220 n. 
 
 Livy, 95, 123 ; on the Gauls, 
 174 ; Machiavelli's commentary 
 on, 100. 
 
 Locke, John, 8, 77. 
 
 London, Architecture of, 114. 
 
 Louis XIV. of France, 54; a 
 patron of literature, 170 ; more 
 a gentleman than Bonaparte, 
 194. 
 
 Louis XV. of France, 70. 
 
 Loutherbourgh, Philip James, 
 169.
 
 252 
 
 INDEX 
 
 Louvre, C. J. Fox at the, 167. 
 Lucan, Pharsalia, 136. 
 Lucretius, imitation of Homer, 
 
 132, 133 ; quoted, 234. 
 Ludlow, Edmund, 44. 
 
 MACAULAY, Lord, on Machiavelli, 
 
 99 n. 
 Machiavelli, 99, 100 ; quoted 
 
 37, 38. 
 Mackintosh Sir James, 33 n. , 70 n. , 
 
 75 n 
 Madison, James, President, xii, 
 
 xiv, xv, xvi, 5n., 8n. 
 Malmeshury, First Earl of, 59 n. 
 Marius, Caius, 160. 
 Marlborough, Duke of, 77. 
 Masaniello, 174. 
 Medina del Rio Seco, Battle of, 
 
 182. 
 
 Melville, Lord, 34 n. 
 Menage, Giles, 166. 
 Menander, 219. 
 Merry, Anthony, 179, 185-6. 
 Metastasio, 171 ; compared with 
 
 Alfieri, 155 ; the poet of the 
 
 sea, 227. 
 
 Mezentius, Virgil's, 128. 
 Middleton, Dr. Conyers, 47 n. 
 Milnes, R. Monckton. See 
 
 "Houghton, Lord." 
 Milton, John, 8, 44, 77 ', Paradise 
 
 Lost, 131 n., 134-5 
 Moira, Countess of, 201. 
 Molesworth, Robert, first Viscount 
 
 and the Franco-Gallia, 203. 
 Moliere, unrivalled as a comic 
 
 writer, 219. 
 Monarch, Landor's hatred of the 
 
 word, 203. 
 Montesquieu, 29i 
 Monuments franfaise, 190. 
 Moreau, Jean Victor, French 
 
 general, 162, 190. 
 Morpeth, Viscount (afterwards 
 
 sixth Earl of Carlisle), 180 n. 
 Murray, Mr. John, x, et seq. ', 
 
 Memoirs of, xiv, n. ', letter to 
 
 Southey, xvii ; Landor's letter 
 
 to, xviii. 
 
 NATIONAL Gallery, wanted in Eng- 
 land, 168. 
 
 Nelson, Lord, 77 ; neglect of, 90 ; 
 at Naples, 118 . 
 
 Nero, 6. 
 
 Netherlands, The, 39 ; J. C. Fox's 
 
 visit to, 111 et seq. 
 Newport, Sir John, 207. 
 Newton, Isaac, 77. 
 Nichols, Admiral, 35. 
 Nobility, in England and other 
 
 countries, 160. 
 North, Lord, second Earl of 
 
 Guildford, 38n., 77. 
 
 O'CONNOR, Arthur, 72., 101, 
 
 107, 191, 192. 
 O'Neill, Mrs., 87- 
 Opposition, The, 79. 
 Orpheus, in Virgil, 129 et seq. 
 Otway, Thomas, 48. 
 Ovid, compared with Ariosto, 149, 
 
 151 ; his epistles, 152 ; quoted, 
 
 152. 
 
 PAGE, Sir Francis, ' ' the hanging 
 
 judge," 241. 
 Painters, French, Italian, and 
 
 English, 168-9. 
 Palafox y Melzi, Jose de, "hero 
 
 of Zaragoza," 138, 172. 
 Paraguay, 10 n. 
 Paris, in Homer, 134. 
 Parr, Dr. Samuel, xviii, xxi ; 
 
 and C. J. Fox, 147. 
 Pascal, Blaise, 76. 
 Peerage, C. J. Fox and the, 91 ; 
 
 William Pitt and the, 45. 
 Pelayo, 138. 
 Pellew, Sir E., 20 n. 
 Penn, William, 77. 
 Pentameron, The,by W. S. Landor, 
 
 44 n. 
 
 Perceval, Spencer, 36., 41. 
 Pericles and Aspasia, by W. S. 
 
 Landor, xxiii, 153 
 Peterborough, Charles Mordauut, 
 
 Earl of, xi, xiii. 
 Pharsalia, Caesar and Pompey at, 
 
 24 ; Lucau's, 136. 
 Pichegru, Charles, French general, 
 
 190. 
 Pindar, compared with Euripides, 
 
 156; his genius, 171, 172; 
 
 quoted, 162 n. 
 Pitt, William, the younger, 5, 6 n. t 
 
 23 n., 29, 62, 56, 58, 66, 160, 
 
 202, 236; the "heaven-born 
 
 minister," 30, 163 ; at the out-
 
 INDEX 
 
 253 
 
 break of the French Revolution, 
 37, 38 ; and the peerage, 45 ; 
 and the French Directory, 59 ; 
 his eloquence, 60 ; duel with 
 Tierney, 60 ; at Home Tooke's 
 trial, 72 ; all account book, 72 ; 
 and the Sinking Fund, 73 ; in 
 the war with France, 78 ; a 
 lover of arbitrary power, 79 ; 
 his Irish policy, 90 ; contempt 
 for literature, 99 ; " incompar- 
 able financier," 163 ; and the 
 currency, 164 ; Canning and, 
 216. 
 
 Plato, his talent for allegory, 233. 
 
 Plutarch, 122-3. 
 
 Poet, qualities of a great, 48. 
 
 Poets, tempore George III., 214. 
 
 Poland, xvii, 162 ; compared with 
 Ireland, 91. 
 
 Polybius, 122-3. 
 
 Pompey, 139, 140 ; at Pharsalia, 
 24. 
 
 Ponsonby, George (1755-1817), 
 206. 
 
 Pope, Alexander, xi, 46 n., 213, 
 215 ; Rape of the Lock, 49 ; 
 Eloisa to Abelard, 49 ; on 
 Homer's shield of Achilles, 
 150 ; his political optimism, 
 81. 
 
 Popham, Sir Hope, 18 . 
 
 Person, Richard, verses by, 229 n. 
 
 Portugal, Queen Maria of, 239, 
 240. 
 
 Poussiu, Nicholas, 168. 
 
 Pretyman, Rev. G., Bishop of 
 Lincoln, 60, 170 n. 
 
 Price, Dr. R. and the Sinking 
 Fund, 73 n. 
 
 Prince Regent, 41, 224 ; Trotter's 
 dedication to, viii. 
 
 Prussia, King Frederick William 
 III. of, 117. 
 
 Prussia, Queen Louisa of, and 
 the English Ambassador, 181. 
 
 Public Characters, 220. 
 
 Pulteney, Sir James Murray, 
 50, 110 ; expedition to Ferrol, 
 20 n. ; Secretary at War, 21 n. 
 
 Quarterly Review, on Landor, vii ; 
 on the Commentary, ix ; on 
 President Madison, xiv n. 
 
 Quiberon, Expedition to, 20. 
 
 RACINE, 96 ; epithets in, 165 ; his 
 characters and method of com- 
 position, 166 ; lines borrowed 
 from Godeau, 166. 
 
 Raleigh, Sir Walter, 77. 
 
 Raphael, 168. 
 
 Recamier, Madame, 189. 
 
 Reviewers of books, 146. 
 
 Reynolds, Sir Joshua, 228. 
 
 Rhyme, in French poetry, 165. 
 
 Riversdale, Lord, xv, 90. 
 
 Robertson, William, Scotch his- 
 torian, and contemporary criti- 
 cism, 144 ; his style, 22 
 
 Robespierre, 9, 29, 66. 
 
 Rogers, Samuel, 56 n. ; on Helen 
 Maria Williams, 186 n. 
 
 Roland, Madame, 107. 
 
 Roman Catholics, 42, 203 ; Fox 
 and, 93, 208. 
 
 Romans, conquests of, 26 ; an un- 
 romantic people, 137. 
 
 Rome, Carthage and, 88 ; re- 
 public of, 122, 123, 140. 
 
 Roscoe, William (1758-1831), 65, 
 205. 
 
 Roscommou, Wentworth Dillon, 
 Earl of, 213. 
 
 Rose, George (1774-1818), xiv ; 
 his book, 235. 
 
 Rosebery, Lord, Pitt, by, quoted, 
 20 n, , 58 n. , 71 n. ; in The Monthly 
 Review, 170 n. 
 
 Rousseau, 224 ; and Thomas Gray, 
 143 ; La NouveUe Hetoise, 143 n. 
 
 Rubens, 115, 169. 
 
 Ruhnken, David, 229. 
 
 Russia, English Ambassador in, 
 179. 
 
 SAINT-SIMON, Due de, Memoirs, 
 205. 
 
 Sallust, 95, 96 ; quoted, 118. ' 
 
 San Sebastian, 182. 
 
 Santona, 182. 
 
 Sarpedon in Homer, 134. 
 
 Saurin, William, Irish Attorney- 
 General, xii, 240 n. 
 
 Scaliger, Joseph, 128, 230 n. 
 
 Scrogges, Sir William, Lord Chief 
 Justice, 241, 
 
 Sejanus, 73. 
 
 Sertorius, 137. 
 
 Seward, Anna, Dr. Johnson and, 
 145.
 
 254 
 
 INDEX 
 
 Shadwell, Thomas, 213. 
 
 Shakespeare, 77, 215 ; his Caliban, 
 231 ; his facility, 149. 
 
 Shenstone, William, Schoolmis- 
 tress, 233. 
 
 Sheridan, Richard Brinsley, 45 n., 
 101 ., 219 ; called the rival of 
 Moliere, 219 ; and Fox, 218, 
 219. 
 
 Sicily, English in, 117, 118. 
 
 Sidney, Sir Philip, 77, 139. 
 
 Similies in poetry, 153. 
 
 Sinking Fund, Pitt and the, 73. 
 
 Slave trade, Fox and the, 64. 
 
 Smith, Adam, Theory of Moral 
 Sentiments, 228. 
 
 Smith, Admiral Sir Sidney, 68 n., 
 239 n. 
 
 Smith, Rev. Sydney, Peter Plym- 
 leys Letters quoted, 36 n. ; on 
 C. J. Fox's verses, 75 n. 
 
 Sophocles, compared with Euri- 
 pides and jSEschylus, 157- 
 
 Sotheby, William, translation of 
 Virgil, 132. 
 
 Southey, Robert, his copy of the 
 Commentary, viii, xx ; corre- 
 spondence with Laudor, ix et seq., 
 on the state of the nation, 31 n. ; 
 and The Critical Review, 146. 
 
 Spain, 68, 108 ; Landor in, xxi, 
 182 ; war with, 84 ; a land of 
 romance, 138 ; nobility of, 
 160 ; English agents in, 181. 
 pallanzani, Lazarus, 243. 
 
 Spenser, Edmund, inferior to 
 Ariosto, 151 ; his language, 212 ; 
 his complaint of neglect, 214 ; 
 The Faery Queene, 154, 212, 213, 
 215. 
 
 Spenserian stanza, The, 233. 
 tadtholder of Holland, 116, 117, 
 124, 125. 
 
 Stanhope, Earl, History of England, 
 quoted, 8n., 237 n. ; Life of 
 William Pitt, 16 n., 46 n., 61 n. 
 
 St. Anne's Hill, Fox at, 104, 111, 
 127, 210. 
 
 erne, Lawrence, an English- 
 man, 87 ; Tristram Shandy 
 quoted, 113?*. 
 
 Supernatural in poetry, 232. 
 
 Swift, Jonathan, xi, 213 ; an 
 Englishman, 87 ; quoted, 241. 
 
 Switzerland, Bonaparte and, 184. 
 
 Sydney, Algernon, 44, 77, 139, 
 189. 
 
 TACITUS, Germania, 123. 
 
 Talleyrand, xiii, 27. 
 
 Tallien, Jean Lambert, 56 ; 
 
 Madame, 191. 
 Tasso, quoted, 151 ; compared with 
 
 Alfieri, 155. 
 
 Taxation in England, 6, 28. 
 Terence, Julius Caesar's verses on, 
 
 216, 219 n. 
 Thackeray, F., Life of Chatham, 
 
 71 n. 
 
 Theatre, in France, 164, 165. 
 Theocritus, 215. 
 Thomson, James, The Seasons, 75 ; 
 
 Castle of Indolence, 233. 
 " Three in a bed," 53. 
 Thuillier, Julia (Mrs. Landor), 
 
 xxii. 
 
 Thuillier, Vincent, 101 n. 
 Thurlow, Lord Chancellor, 8 n. 
 Tiberius, Emperor/73. 
 Tierney, George, duel with Pitt, 
 
 60. 
 
 Tighe, Mrs., 87. 
 Tomliue, Rev. G. See " Prety- 
 
 man." 
 
 Tonson, Jacob, bookseller, 48 n. 
 Tooke, Home, 111 ; trial of, 72 n. 
 Triumvirate, The Roman, 85. 
 Trotter, John Bernard, author of 
 
 Memoirs of C. J. Fox, viii et seq. 
 Turks, Virtues of the, 24. 
 Turner, J. M. W., painter, 169. 
 Tyrolese, The, 10. 
 
 UNITED STATES. See " America." 
 
 VALENCIENNES, Siege of, 39. 
 
 Venetian painters, 169. 
 
 Vernet, Horace, 168. 
 
 Versailles, 169. 
 
 Villoison, Jean Baptiste, C. J. 
 Fox on, 229. 
 
 Virgil, readings in, 127-32, 195 ; 
 imitations of Homer, 128, 132 ; 
 Lander's translation from, 131 ; 
 defects in the JEneid, 136 ; his 
 tineas, 137 ; his want of judg- 
 ment, 138 ; pathos, 139 ; con- 
 trasted with Ariosto, 151 ; moral 
 and political axioms, 157 ; his 
 Dido, 197 ; seascapes in, 227.
 
 INDEX 
 
 255 
 
 Voltaire, praise of Machiavelli, 
 99 ; hated by Alfieri, 155. 
 
 WALCHEREN Expedition, 21 n., 22. 
 Walker, Dr. de Noe, xviii. 
 Walpole, Horace, quoted, 16 n. , 
 
 70 n., 71 n. 
 
 War, Weapons in, 101. 
 Warton, Joseph, 228, 232; on 
 
 Pope, 49 ; Translation of Virgil, 
 
 132. 
 Washington, George, 68, 77, 137 ; 
 
 and the War of Independence, 
 
 77, 78. 
 
 Wellington, the Duke of, xi, xiii. 
 West Indies, 39. 
 Westminster Hall, A statue for, 
 
 77. 
 
 Whitelocke, General John, 18 n. , 
 50, 110 ; court-martial on, 20 n. 
 
 Whitworth, Charles, Earl, 178 n. 
 
 William III., 28, 140. 
 
 Williams, Helen Maria, 186-8, 191. 
 
 Wilson, Richard, painter, 169. 
 
 Windham, William (1750-1810), 
 17 n., 20 n., 217. 
 
 Witt, John and Cornelius de, 125. 
 
 Wyttenbach, Daniel, his Vita 
 Ruhnkerii, 229. 
 
 XERXES, 63. 
 
 YORK, Frederick Augustus, Duke 
 of, 39 n. 
 
 ZARAGOZA, the hero of, 138. 
 
 Printed by Haull, Watton <t Vinty, Id., London and Aylttbvry.
 
 A 000 687 535 5