1 6 4 :p U 5 1 ^^^s J> 6 == F !=i -1 8 DE PEYSTER Practical Strategy ...iR» PRACTICAL STRATEGY AS ILLUSTRATED BY THE LIFE AND ACHIEVEMENTS OP A MASTER OF THE ART, THE M^itim MM MmM (50 TRAUN. FKEDERIC THE GREAT'S PRECEPTOR IN THE ART OF WAR. " Marshal Traxjn, tJuit vm a Man indeed P' "■ I went to 8c7ml to TuAmty Fbbderic thb 6bba¥. CATSKIl-l- _^ _, JOSEPH .lOESBURY, BOOK AND JOB PRINTBB, "JOURNAL OFPICS. 1868. A. Q^ ^TA INTRODUCTORY REMARKS. "Je n' al rleu £ait pour la poetcrite, ponrtant"— ajoata-t^il, en designant son front -^''j'avais la quclqnc chose." Andre-Marie Cdenieb, About to die by the Guillotine, 25th July, 1794. Waste of Life DXJKiNa the present Wab. {Could' it not have Iteen obviated by tJie Gomprehension of Practical Strategy ?) " The natural principle of war is to do the most harm to our enemy ■with the least harm to ourselves, and this, of course, is to- be effected by stratagem," (i. e., practical strategy.) Washikqton Irving, " A victory is twice itself, when the achiever brings home full numbers." Shakspeare, Mwh Ado. I, 1. 7 I I This pamplilet was prepared in a great measure about a year since, and finished witliin the montli. It is called forth by the contemplation of resultless, or comparatively resultless combats, and a prodigal waste of such a Per- sonal as has never before constituted the bulk of armies. The Loyal North has sufiered such repeated sacrifices of superior men, that the question forces itself upon the mind, whether such expenditure of life was absolutely necessary, and whether or not it was not chargeable to ignorance or incomprehension of the plainest rules of true generalship, Practical Strategy. The most thoughtless and unfeeling man could scarcely repress a shudder, if he would only pause to reflect upon instances of the fearful waste of our best, bravest and most experienced oflSicers and privates, staked with «, desperation, unworthy the military art, upon almost im- 3 possible results; regular Balaclava charges, presenting equal chances of destruction with far inferior chances of success and glory. These sacrifices are not necessarily attributable to leaders in the field. Like the Balaclava charge, they may have originated in orders sent from- superiors at a distance, and given in ignorance of the actual condition of afi^irs upon the spot. It is the ftinc- tion of the future to place the guilt where it belongs. — . Unfortunately public men are put on trial too late to expiate their sins in person, they only suffer in reputation, and veiy few men, especially political men, in this country, care for posthumous reputation. The only rewards they seek are tangible omes. Before entering upon tbe career of the General selected as an example of what can be accomplished by scientific practical strategy, it would be well to consider what tlie greatest military authorities have remarked about fighting battles, and that ^Itiiough men may not have any value in the eyes of extemporised leaders, they were nevertheiefli rated at their true value by the most scientific and suc- cessful generals who have lived. And it would be well to remember that even the victorious and magnificent Marlborough owed his disgrace and supersedure in a. great measure to the obloquy which fell npon him, in consequence of what was considered his" wanton sacri-- fice of so many gallant men to his personal ambition, without any solid benefit to the allies," his reckless waste f modern times, was reproached with manoeuvering too much, and too often avoiding an engagement in which the chances appeared to be in his favor, the astute Span- iard replied, the object, invariably, of every General is to get the better of, or conquer, his opponent or the enemy, and not always to light, for, when a campaign has been carried on successfully, a General has triumphed, whether he has fought a battle or not. Macchiavelli, who lived and wrote two centuries pre- vious, expressed this idea much more neatly, " Good Generals," he remarked, " only fight battles when neces- sity compels them to, or the opportunity is eminently propitious." This idea, however^ does not originate with either of thfi above, for Pericles, the Athenian, that spoiled child of fortune, who flourished in the beginning of the Vth Century B. C, asserted that "it was often the last resource and tlie proof of a poor general to fight a battle, and, on the other hand, the evidence of superlative generalship to triumph without fighting." Napoleon Bonaparte enunciated the same great truth rather by his action than by his teaching, although he often expressed the same adviee more at length. And Frederic the Great, far superior to either of the preceding, put more faith in Practical Strategy than in downright fighting, and like Hannibal, his prototype in antiquity, preferred successes achieved by manceuvring to those won by hammer and tongs work, although he did eiiough of both. He left behind him many wise counselH^^ not the least of which " Always be beforehand with, or c trip lip, tlie enemy," and the strenuous advice to spare no pains to preserve an anny acclimated to war. Finally, in regard to the comparative value of Veterans and Recruits, listen to the experience of the astute Duke of Alva, and the great (great in every sense) Gustavus Adolphus, and the sagacious Frederic of Prussia, and the interestedly wise and superlatively cunning Napoleon, and, tlien, when their testimony has been duly weighed, ttere are few but will decide with Augustus Caesar : "Festina fenfe," 1. c_ " Haeten Blowly." " Do not let Impetuosity betray ioto imprudence." witli Vauban, and with Traun, that it is better to wait a little and let science compensate for valor and blood, and that the greatest generalship is to preserve valuable lives by vigilance and address : *' Festinare rwcet, nocet el cunctatio smpe : Tempore que resolution of Montecuculi. On the 20th January, 1745, the Emperor Charles VII, who, in the attempt to acquire foreign states, lost his own, died. Expelled, led back, driven forth and brought in again, he expired, nevertheless, at last, in the castle of his ancestors at Munich. His son, Maximilian Joseph, warned by the sad fate of his father, acted more wisely and withstood the interested cajoleries of France and Prussia- April 28tlL, he subscribed the preliminaries of peitee with Maria Theresa. An election for Emperor was now to be held in the Imperial city of Frankfort on the Mayn. To guarantee freedom of choice to the German Electoral College, the remaining Austrian forces in Bavaria appeared under Traun in the circles of Suabia and Franconia. These, and the districts in which Traun operated, are now the kingdoms of "Wurtemberg, and the smaller States imme- diately north of that kingdom and Bavaria, between the Lahn, N., and the Kocher, S. ; the Fulda, Sinn, Mayn and Tauber, E., and the Rhine, W., particularly Electoral and Grand-ducal Hesse. Even as he had commanded on the Rhine and in Bohe- mia, in 1744, in the name of Prince Charles, even so, in 1745, Traun exerted his talents in the name of his brother, the Arch-duke Francis, Grand Duke^ Tuscany. Mean- while the King of France and his generals had pledged 65 themselves to Frederic to oppose the election of the Arel»- duke Francis, husband of Maria Theresa, even at the risk •of a battle. Accordingly Louis XV sent a French army of 80,000 men, under Lieutenant-General the Prince of Conti, to threaten the assembled Electors. Conti, how- ever little generalship he displayed in this campaign, had nevertheless shown considerable enterprise and ability in his operations against the Sardinians, among the Mari- time Alps, in the preceding year^ 1744. Traun had from 30 to 40,.0(X> troops. He concerted his plan of operations in perfect accordance with his accus- tomed mode of action. AVithont delivering^ a battle- lie achieved complete success by his Practical Strategy. May 30th, 1745, Traun led his army in three grand divisions out of the Duchy of I*^euburg, on the Danube, into Northern Wurteinberg, He first advanced, in the direction of Heilbronn, to Hall, on the Kocher, then he wheeled suddenly northwards and hastened by forced marches through Mergentheim, N. extremity of Wurtem- berg, to the Mayn. At the opening of the campaign, the Prince of Conti had disposed his army so as to dispute the passage of the Necar, in the expectation that the Austrians intended ta cross this river. Wlien, afterwards, he learned that in- stead of advancing westw^ards, Traun was in reality mov- ing northwards, parallel to the Neckar, the French hur- ried, likewise in the same direction, by forced marches, into Hesse-Darmstadt, by a route parallel to that whi^h they supposed the Austrians would take. Coati encamp- ed on the plains near Umstadt, 10 miles E. of Damistadt. The French had mffle this movement to get ahead of Traun and prevent his junction with the Austrian army- « 56 corps, under Batthyani, coming' up from the Netherlands and moving southwards to. join him. As all the places mentioned herein are laid down on Jolmston's (Edinburgh) ]S"ational x\tlas, reference thereto will show that the position of Umstadt was not ill chosen ; that thence Conti could manoeuvre on Interior lines while Traun was moving by Exterior lines, almost on the arc of a circle of which TJmstad't was the centre. Keverthelesa Traun marched with such celerity, even on this circum- ference, that he was always ahead of the French. From Umstadt, Conti should have overwlielmed Batthyani before he crossed the Kinzig, and before Tralm could join him, since the French were at the apex of a triangle, whose much shortest side stretched towards Batthyani and whose longest towards Traun. Meanwhile Batthyani liad already parsed theLahn, and was hastening on, by the way of Laubach and Birstein, towns lying almost in a direct line between Giessen, on the Lahn, and Salmunster, on the Kinzig. Laubach lies 15 miles S. E. of Giessen, in Hesse-Darmstadt ; Birstein, jn Hesse-Cassel, about the same distance K. "W. of Orb, on the Orb, an affluent of the Kinzig, at the extreme north point of Bavaria. Traun constantly moving on, made continual feints of attacking the Prince of Conti, last mentioned as encamp- ed, near Umstadt, and completely deceived him as to his intentions. Conti had advanced to Aschaffenburg, on the Mayn, about 12 miles N. E. of Umstadt and 23 miles E. S. E. of JFrankfort. All at once Traun disappeared from before the French, in position there, and was lost to their reconnoissances and eclaireurs oehind the screen of the foreflt-clad Speseart rtiountain*. 67 This range, parallel to, and, here, north and yet west of the Mayn, stretches N. N. E. to the Kinzig, where it joins the western spurs of the Rhcengebirge. It formed a perfect blind. In like manner the Rebels have operated, protected and covered by the Blue Ridge. Down along the Shenandoah, again and again, Stonewall Jackson roll- ed his victorious torrent of war. Backwards and for- wards, like a shuttle, rebel columns, a continual menace, shot to and fro through that valley while our armies lay on the Potomac from Alexandria upwards. Just so Lee turned Pope under cover of the Blue Ridge. Behind the double blind of the Bull Run and Kittoctan ranges and of the Blue Ridge, Lee again sought to deceive Hooker. Having thus outmanoeuvred his adversaries, Traun mo- ved rapidly behind the leafy Spessart from Wertheim by the way of Lolir, both on the Mayn, to Urb or Orb, and united with Batthyani. With forces augmented by this junction, to 70,000 men, Traun now, in turn, offered battle again and again to Conti. He even detached Barenklau, who passed around the French left and crossed the Rhine at Biberich just below Mayence. The Prince of Conti took alarm at once and retreated hurriedly down the Mayn. So much was he afraid of the Austrians, that he blew up the bridge at Ascliaffenburg and broke down that at Hoechst and fell back to Gross-Gerau near the Rhine. Traun passed the Mayn, and Barenklau, opera- ting in obedience to orders, actually defeated a French detachment of Conti's Free-Coi-ps near Oppenheim, di- rectly in the rear of the French, on their own, the West side of the Rhine, which intervened between Conti and France. On receipt of this intelligence, Conti made no farther attempts to hold his ground, but repassed the 68 Khine, 18tli July, 1745, at Gernsheiin and Rheinturk- beim, below Worms, and encamped near that city behind the stream, Osthofen. From thence he retired to Mut- terstadt. In this retreat the Prince of Conti lost his bag- gage and had his troops much harassed. "Traun^s campaign has always received high commen- dation, because he compelled the French to retire behind the Rhine by well-planned marches and the choice of hi& positions alone. Political reasons prevented him from following the French, because Austria was dependent on its allies." This is a wonderful example of a series of victories with- out battles, in which Traun crossed and re-crossed the Rhine successfully in the presence of an enemy vastly superior in force, disconcerted all the plans of the French military leaders, traversed and re-traversed Germany with the speed of a cavalry corps, drove Frederic the Great out of Bohemia, and the French across the Rhine, and would have brought about a different result for his- tory to record had he been left untrammeled by the Aulic Council. In consequence of this successful practical strategy, the election at Frankfort was undisturbed and the grand duke Franz Stephen, in spite of all the opposition of France and Prussia, attained to the Imperial dignity. On the 8th Oct. 1745, the new Emperor, received his heroic wife, Maria Theresa, the queen of Hungary and Bohemia, in the camp at Heidelberg, and, thence, led her, thanks to Traun, back in triumph to Vienna. Thither, now, likewise journeyed the triumphant Traun and, in consequence of the prospects of a general peace, which every day became more hopeful, received a year's leave of absence to rest his war-worn body and mind. In 59 1747, the chief command in Transylvania was conferred upon him. This dignity however, he only enjoyed for a few weeks. On the 10th Feb., 1748, he died at the cap- ital, Hermannstadt, at the advanced age of 70 years, not less honored and blessed at his death than when he had formerly laid down his vice-royal charge at Milan. Khevenhuller and Traun have been styled "by military critics, til* (Ajax) Telamon and Fabius of Austria in its hour of extremest danger and its direst need. Their names appear in the list of the war chiefs of a military nation as those of heroes forever worthy of the highest praise and enduring gratitude of their country. That Traun is comparatively unknown is undeniable ; that he was the greatest practical strategist (i. e. General in the true sense of the word) of the middle half of the XVIII Century is indisputable. This seems a paradox and yet nothing is more susceptible of demonstration, when all the facts are brought together and considered. — It was Traun's misfortune throughout his career of Gen- eralship to serve, even when invested with equal authori- ty, with a reigning, i>owerful military king and with or under, as ad-latus, [i. e Ger : zur Seite or zur Hulfe^ two princes, the first of whom, the Grand Duke of Tuscany, was neutral as to the Spaniards, in regard to his Italian dominions, while, being husband of Traun's sovereign, he was actually hostile against them, and afterwards Emperor of Germany ; the second, the brother of the former, a prince and arch duke and a pretender to sovereign rights. Serving with the King of Sardinia, Traun was eminently successful against the greatest odds and accomplished more than his inadequate means would seem to have justi- fted his attempting. Yet the King, in general history has all the glory. "The peer (Traun) slew the (Spanish i boar The king (Sardiniin) had the glQire." 60 111 1744, especially upon the Rhine, Traun is scarcely noticed, and, in his operations against Frederic, Duparcq in liis "Historical and Military Studies on Prussia" actu- ally ascribes his actions to "Daun," and Lord Dover, in his "Life of Frederic II, the Great," to Brown (Braun.) Even Schlosser mistook Brown (Braun) for Traun, and repre- sents the latter as fighting against the French and Span- iards in Italy, when he was actually battling against his own bodily infirmities at home. The result proves that all Traun's achievements served only to increase the cel- ebrity of superiors in political rank and the brilliancy of his talents were absorbed in the splendor of the caste of his coadjutors. Such is the trustworthiness of "History for the Million," "the things' called histories (which) are worse than 'will of the wisps'." Such is the injustice daily culminating even around us. Schlosser and Russell, and even Colletta, while admit- ting that Traun covered himself with glory in Italy, in 1734, cannot free themselves from the weight of prejudic- ed authorities so as to do justice to Traun, and make him as conspicuous as he deserves. The Austro-Italian Vice- roy to whom he owed obedience, ran away after he had frittered away Traun's supports, and enriched himself, and "left Traun to shift for himself; and Visconti's coadju- tor CaraiFa, who has the suffrages of Italian historians, after doing all the harm that he could do, was ordered to Vien- na to justify his conduct before the Supreme Council when no more harm could be done, leaving to Traun the only alternative of unavailing resistance or of succumbing gloriously. In a word, Traun's superiors having prepared inevitable defeat, left him to suffer a certain reverse which by his manner of meeting it converted Traun's mishaps into the instruments of his apotheosis. Hormayr, in his Austrian Plutarch concludes his biog- 01 ruphy of Traun with eloquent reflections, of wliicli the following are, in some respects, as close a translation as his Gennan will permit, to avoid obscurity. It is indeed a great glory to be the fortunate leader of victorious armies at an epoch of great and general war and, by success, to enlarge the dominions of a native state. But such a famous and fortunate career is not reserved for every general, and it is perhaps a still greater glory to assume the command at the most imminent crisis and the direst need of a nation and save a country, as was the case with Khevenhuller and with Traun. For even as that leader dares and adventures much less who fights against his equal in a varying and alternately suc- cessful campaign than another commander who carries on a defensive campaign against long and constantly success- ful superiority, or against sw4ft, ever-increasing and over- powering force, furious as a mountain torrent, even so HIGHER honor cannot be denied to even infeeioe genius and skill when the deficiency is made up by a noble con- tempt of danger and loss of reputation with the multi- tude, or by indomitable force of will, the only quality which presents an individual as equally great under fa- vorable, or advei'se circumstances. It was this invincible, never despairing determination which made Traun so great, and greatly to be admired, and it is as a, perhaps, not always victorious, but still never subdued War Chief, that his image looms up be fore us in the Present so strikingly grand from the misty distance of a great epoch of the Past. Tkaun should HQver be forgotten by any military stu- dent as a wonderful example of skill, making amends for want of Fortune, and as a Master of that Science which is most needed at this juncture, the misunderstood but inestimable application of Practical Strategy. 62 S U MMA E Y. "He 1e the best general who wine a decisive battl« with the lotsofthefe^oest men.''' Many Thoughts on Many Thinor. " Battles are the last Resort of a good General." " He is one that accounts Learning the Nonrishment of Military Virtue, and lays that as his first foundation. He had rather save one of his own soldiers than kill ten of his enemies. * * He knows the hazards of battles — not the pomp of «eremonies are soldiers" best theatres. * * He imderetands, in wars there ie no means to err twice; the first and least fault being sufBcient to ruin an army; faults, therefore, he pardons none ; they that are presidents of disorder ormutiny^ repair it by being examples of his justice. Besiege him never so strictly, so long as the air is not cut from him, his heart faints not. He hath learned aa well to make use of a victory as to get it; and in pursuing his enemy, line a whirlwind^ carries all afore him, being assured if ever a man will benefit himself upon his foe, then is the time, when they have lost force, wisdom, coura^. and reputation. • • If he cannot overcome his enemy by Force, he does it by Time. * * He casts a smiling contempt upon culumny ; it meets him as if glass should en- counter adamant. He thinks war is never to be given over but oh one of thews three conditions : — an assured peace, absolute victory, or an honest death." Sir Thomas Overbubt. "Strategy may be divided into" Hypothetical (i. e. newspaper), Theoretical^ A)>plied, (i. e. actual, check-mate, werkthatige), and Tactical (in which battles are necessary agents). Strategy." W. P. W. There is nothing, perhaps, so generally misunderstood, even by military men, both as to definition, theory, and application, as Practical (efficacious or real,) StRATEOT. The Anawnda Sys- tem, once 80 vaunted, now as much reviled, which often succeedi against a rebellion, particularly when that rebellion has elements of discord within itself, is nothing more than one application of Prac- tical (efficiently operative) Strategy. Nevertheless, to succeed, its forces must be exerted just as the monster snake applies its powers. It is the peculiar property of our countrymen to cry hosannas over everything that is at once rtj);>ar(?«f?y successful, and condemn every- thing which does not work smoothly and immediately in a bungler 's hands. At first, every one was in favor of what was termed the Anaconda Strategy ; now, everybody is against it. The first opinion ■was correct at that time, because the country had every reason to suppose there was a strong union element within the South, and the second, changed, opinion may be equally right at this time, since it has been proved that the union sentiment cannot exert itself eflfec- tually. Both opinions may have been correct but at different times, and under different circumstances. But if the Anaconda System did not succeed, even apparently, why did it fail ? Because those who undertook to apply it, did not study and imitate the action of the anaconda itself. The colossal reptile does not simply encircle its prey with an inert, flaccid coil and liring its strength to bear in spasmodic, dislocated efforts, but, as soon as the object of its attack is begirt with its tremendous contractile force, it exerts that force with terrible, simultaneous, persistent intensity and keeps up the pressure equally and everywhere, until all the power of resistance is extinct, and its prey is crushed into an inert mass, fitted to be swal- lowed up, to nourish and to recuperate, for new efforts, the very power which destroyed it. So should our anaconda of armies and fleets have acted and so should the North still continue to act Until the South is crushed into a submission which could not present any form or consistence to prevent the North from mould- ing its future according to its will and pleasure, and thus derive, from its transformed condition, adequate resources to meet new enemies at home or abroad. In one respect however our Anaconda System, let quid nuncs argue what they will, did not fail after all, for what could have been ac- G3 complished bad not the blockading squadrons completed and main- tained its coil. 80 vast however was the circumference embraced that our efforts only amounted in some Quarters to what Decker styles Paralysis of the enemy, in others to Neutralizatioa. Perhaps there are no two ideas more opposite than Theoretical, dead or in- operative, and Practical, or efficient. Strategy. The former may have succeeded in just a sufficient number of instances to justify its consideration by a military analyzer and critic. Under what head can McClellan's operations on the Potomac '61-'2 be classified ? Was it Practical Strategy, as Decker taught ? "Would it be unjust to style it theoretical-strategicnl-neutralization of the rebel masses in presence or supposed to be antagoDistic ? It certainly was not Werkthatige Strategies for the Federalists were not active. "But, when," says Decker, "theoretical strategy ventures to pretend that it can force an enemy to abandon his position by simply man- ©euvering and without running the risk of fighting or conflicts, this magnificent theory will be very rarely realized in practice, and, even then, only when the enemy proves himself extraordinarily feeble" morally and physically. That great results have been accomplished by even second class generals, through their comprehension and application of Practical (real) Strategy, without delivering or accepting, or without being forced into a great battle, has been proved by all reliable military history. Not to go back too far, let us begin with the era of Louis XI, who, weighing means and results, was the greatest sovereign who sat upon the throne of France, both as to practical diplomacy,' practical administration, and practical strategy, as applicable in accordance with the military organization of his era. Take for in- stance, his successful campaign, of 1463, against the "League of the Public Good. The only fit comparisons or foils to it, at hand, are one or two of Frederic's Campaigns, in the Seven Years War, and Na- poleon's offensive-defensive campaign of 1814 against the Allies in France. Taking into consideration, time, circumstances, means and forces, Louis dissolved, by head-work, heart-work and hand-work, a greater Coalition, in 1463, than Frederic, in 1757-'63, and than Napoleon held in check, in 1814. As this brochure is written to do justice to one of the great men obscured by the great titles and lofty positions of little men, it is scarcely a digression to declare what immense strides the ill-known Louis XI, almost as generally unappreciated and unknown to the masses as Traun, made towards modern military systemization. — He was the first who made practical and sensible ameliorations in siege artillery ; he first substituted brass cannon, founded entire, for iron cannon, wrought, in pieces, and cast, solid shot for cut stone and marble balls. He was the creator of grand reviews, the germs of camps of instruction, and military inspections, regular troops with fire arms, and light cavalry proper. He, himself^ encouraged printing, and he never injured the people however deeply he wounded the aristocracy. Comines attests that Louis XI established a Camp of Instruction at Pont de I'Arche, in which he assembled 20,000 men, and kept them together for several years under the strictest discipline, practicing manoeuvres and observing every precaution as if in front of an enemy. As a creator Louis was greater than Napoleon, as a king and a man not more selfish and criminal, particularly it we take into consideration the differ- ence of means, manners and morals at the epochs in which they severally shone. I r 64 With but a reiereiicc to antiquity, and without groping through the misty scenes ot chivalric eras or going over the whole range of the military operations fff the last three centuries, simple allusions to a few notable achievements will be sufficient as Examples of Practical Strategy. ^ A.moug the ancients there was no Practical Strategist who could approach to Hannibal. He was Practical Strategy incarnate. Sci- pio Africanus showed his comprehension ot the same art or science by carrying the war into Spain and Africa, wliereby he forced Hannibal to abandon Italy, and conquered Carthage. He struck at his opponent's communications, and his base. In recent times consider the 2 campaigns of Gustavus Adolphua, 1631-3, how influential, yet only two decisive battles :— Baner's 4 campaigns, 1G86-'41, how destructive, yet only one first class battle :— Torstenson's 4 campaigns, 1642-45, in which he brought Austria to the brink of destruction, conquered Denmark, paralyzed Saxony* ruined three of the finest armies which the empire had sent into the field and performed two marches which are worthy of compar- ison with any recorded in ancient or modern annals, yet he fought only 2 first class battles :— [to whom in this present war shall we com- pare the great Swede's opponent, the popular Gallas, known in military annals as the "Ruiner of (of his own) armies?"] :— Wrangel-s 3 campaigns, i645-'8, carried on accordin^g to the plan and under the advice of Torstenson, which finished the XXX Years War, pre- sent but one conflict, approaching the importance of abattle prop- "erly speaking, Susmarshausen, a great surprise or vast skirmish : — Turenne and Montecucnli's 2 campaigns, 1674-5, how instructive, nevertheless only 2 battles :— [Turenne fell when about to deliver a third, and the French had to abandon the right or east bank of the Rhine:]— Prince Eugene's campaign of 1706 and flank march from Trent to Turin, "a master piece of daring enterprise"' resulting in a victory which swept the French ont of Italy : — Traun's 2 cam- paigns of 1744-'5, without a battle, in which he nevertheless invaded France, saved Bohemia, secured the election of the Emperor Fran- cis and accomplished all he sought to do:— Frederic the Great's campaign of Rosbach and Leuthen, 1757, superior to anything ■which the world has ever yet witnessed :— Goergey's 2 campaigns of 1848-9, which, if the Russians had not interfered would have finished the Austrian Imperiaity:— and Radetsky's 2 campaigns of 1848-9, in the first of which he dissipated the Sardinian delu- sions of ambition, and in the second placed his nonagenarian heel upon the neck of prostrate Sardinia herself. Three ot Frederic's battles tower up like the highest peaksof the Himalayas as wonder- ful examples of Practical Strategy, Rosbach and Leuthen of anni- hilating superior armies, Liegnitz a double operation of paralyzing one and beating another army at the same time. As an illustration, Vauban was an example of Practical Strategy in Engineering just as Rosbach and Leuthen and Liegnitz were instances of Practical Strategy in Fighting, Gilmore seems to be playing the Vauban in this war, expending bullets and sweat and saving men and blood. Just as there was no stand stdll with Vau- ban and Frederic, and in a minor sphere with Traun, just so there i& no convulsive jerks forward with Gilmore and Rosecrans, but assured progress. No reference is made to the campaigns of Napoleon, because ho is the writer's detestation, never referred to except necessity com- pels J. Watts de Peyster, ROSE HILL. TivoLi, September 5th, 1863. THE LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST D STAMPED BELOW.