IKLF OM1C THEORY, PA;PERS, LAM H\ '- ; VV'-, M j A^-Vt ?^, M. THOMAS THOMSON, M.i), Blcmbic Ciu No. 2. (gfemfitc fu6 (geprtnf0 (Ho. 2. FOUNDATIONS OF THE ATOMIC THEORY: COMPRISING PAPERS AND EXTRACTS BY JOHN DALTON, WILLIAM HYDE WOLL'ASTON, M.D. AND THOMAS THOMSON, M.D., (1802-1808.) A/H>X OF THE r \ UNIVERSITY) ^/ EDINBURGH : WILLIAM F. CLAY, 18 TEVIOT PLACE. LONDON : SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, HAMILTON, KENT & CO. LTD. 1893. PREFACE. THIS little book contains reprints of original memoirs and extracts from text-books, embracing the earliest publications by their respective authors bearing upon the foundation of the Atomic Theory. The view is pretty generally held by chemists that it was in the endeavour to explain numerous examples which were known to him, of that general regularity which is now commonly called Jthe Law of Multiple Proportions, that Dalton was led to entertain the ideas which he held regarding the constitution of compound bodies. There has therefore been included, along with later publications, the paper by Dalton in which there is described probably the first example of this regularity with which he became acquainted. The first part of Dalton's " New System of Chemical Philosophy," containing his own account of his views, did not appear until 1808, although these views had been embodied in courses of lectures which Dalton had delivered some years previously. The earliest printed account of his views is that given by Dr Thomas Thomson in Volume 3 of the Third Edition of his "System of Chemistry," published in 1807. This account is repro- duced in the following pages. A paper by Wollaston on Super-acid and Sub-acid Salts, giving various examples illustrative of the Law of Multiple Proportions, is also included. L. D. *SE OF THE :VERSITY EXPERIMENTAL ENQUIRY INTO THE PROPORTION OF THE SEVERAL GASES OR ELASTIC FLUIDS, CON- STITUTING THE ATMOSPHERE. BY JOHN DALTON.* Read Nov. 12, 1802. IN a former paper which I submitted to this Society, " On the constitution of mixed gases," I adopted such proportions of the simple elastic fluids to constitute the atmosphere as were then current, not intending to warrant the accuracy of them all, as stated in the said paper; my principal object in that essay was, to point I out the manner in which mixed elastic fluids exist \ together, and to insist upon what I think a very important and fundamental position in the doctrine of such fluids : namely, that the elastic or repulsive power of each particle is confined to those of its own kind ; and con- sequently the force of such fluid, retained in a given vessel, or gravitating, is the same in a separate as in a mixed state, depending upon its proper density and temperature. This principle accords with all experience, and I have no doubt will soon be perceived and acknow- ledged by chemists and philosophers in general ; and its application will elucidate a variety of facts, which are otherwise involved in obscurity. * From the Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, Second Series, Volume I., 1805, pp. 244-258. In this paper there is announced the first example of the law of multiple proportions. 6 Dalton. The objects of the present essay are, 1. To determine the weight of each simple atmosphere, abstractedly ; or, in other words, what part of the weight of the whole compound atmosphere is due to azote ; what to oxygen, &c. &c. 2. To determine the relative weights of the different gases in a given volume of atmospheric air, such as it is at the earth's surface. 3. To investigate the proportions of the gases to each other, such as they ought to be found at different eleva- tions above the earth's surface. To those who consider the atmosphere as a chemical compound, these three objects are but one . others, who adopt my hypothesis, will see they are essentially distinct. With respect to the first : It is obvious, that, on my hypothesis, the density and elastic force of each gas at the earth's surface, are the effects of the weight of the atmosphere of that gas solely, the different atmospheres not gravitating one upon another. Whence the first object will be obtained by ascertaining what share of elastic force is due to each gas in a given volume of the compound atmosphere ; or, which amounts to the same thing, by finding how much the given volume is diminished under a constant pressure, by the abstraction of each of its ingredients singly. Thus, if it should appear that by extracting the oxygenous gas from any mass of atmospheric air, the whole was diminished \ in bulk, still being subject to a pressure of 30 inches of mercury ; then it ought to be inferred that the oxygenous atmosphere presses the earth with a force of 6 inches of mercury, &c. In order to ascertain the second point, it will be further necessary to obtain the specific gravity of each gas ; that is, the relative weights of a given volume of each in a pure state, subject to the same pressure and Proportion of Gases in the Atmosphere. 7 temperature. For, the weight of each gas in any given portion of atmospheric air, must be in the compound ratio of its force and specific gravity. With respect to the third object, it may be observed, that those gases which are specifically the heaviest must decrease in density the quickest in ascending. If the earth's atmosphere had been a homogeneous elastic fluid of the same weight it is, but ten times the specific gravity, it might easily be demonstrated that no sensible portion of it could have arisen to the summits of the highest mountains. On the other hand, an atmosphere of hydro- genous gas, of the same weight, would support a column of mercury nearly 29 inches on the summit of Mount Blanc. The several gases constantly found in every portion of atmospheric air, and in such quantities as are capable of being appreciated, are azotic, oxygenous, aqueous vapour, and carbonic acid. It is probable that hydro- genous gas also is constantly present ; but in so small proportion as not to be detected by any test we are acquainted with ; it must therefore be confounded in the large mass of azotic gas. i. Of the Weight of the Oxygenous and Azotic Atmospheres. Various processes have been used to determine the quantity of oxygenous gas. 1. The mixture of nitrous gas and air over water. 2. Exposing the air to liquid sulphuret of potash or lime, with or without agitation. 3. Exploding hydrogen gas and air by electricity. 4. Exposing the air to a solution of green sulphat or muriat of iron in water, strongly impregnated with nitrous gas. 8 Dalton. 5. Burning phosphorus in the air. In all these cases the oxygen enters into combination and loses its elasticity ; and if the several processes be conducted skilfully, the results are precisely the same from all. In all parts of the earth and at every season of the year, the bulk of any given quantity of atmospheric air appears to be reduced nearly 2 1 per cent, by abstract- ing its oxygen. This fact, indeed, has not been generally admitted till lately ; some chemists having found, as they apprehended, a great difference in the quantity of oxygen in the air at different times and places; on some occasions 20 per cent, and on others 30, and more of oxygen are said to have been found. This I have no doubt was owing to their not understanding the nature of the operation and of the circumstances influencing it. Indeed it is difficult to see, on any hypothesis, how a disproportion of these two elements should ever subsist in the atmosphere. As the first of the processes above-mentioned has been much discredited by late authors, and as it appears from my experience to be not only the most elegant and expeditious of all the methods hitherto used, but also as correct as any of them, when properly conducted, I shall, on this occasion, animadvert upon it. 1. Nitrous gas may be obtained pure by nitric acid diluted with an equal bulk of water poured upon copper or mercury ; little or no artificial heat should be applied. The last product of gas this way obtained, does not con- tain any sensible portion of azotic gas ; at least it may easily be got with less than 2 or 3 per cent, of that gas : It is probably nearly free from nitrous oxide also, when thus obtained. 2. If 100 measures of common air be put to 36 of pure nitrous gas in a tube 3-ioth of an inch wide and 5 inches long, after a few minutes the whole will be reduced Proportion of Gases in the Atmosphere. 9 to 79 or 80 measures, and exhibit no signs of either oxygenous or nitrous gas. 3. If 100 measures of common air be admitted to 72 of nitrous gas in a wide vessel over water, such as to form a thin stratum of air, and an immediate momentary agitation be used, there will, as before, be found 79 or 80 measures of pure azotic gas for a residuum. 4. If, in the last experiment, less than 72 measures of nitrous gas be used, there will be a residuum containing oxygenous gas ; if more, then some residuary nitrous gas will be found. These facts clearly point out the theory of the process: the elements of oxygen may combine with a certain portion of nitrous gas, or with twice that portion, but with no intermediate quantity. In the former case nitric acid is the result ; in the latter nitrous acid : but as both these may be formed at the same time, one part of the oxygen going to one of nitrous gas, and another to two, the quantity of nitrous gas absorbed should be variable ; from 36 to 72 per cent, for common air. This is the principal cause of that diversity which has so much appeared in the results of chemists on this subject. In fact, all the gradation in quantity of nitrous gas from 36 to 72 may actually be observed with atmospheric air of the same purity ; the wider the tube or vessel the mixture is made in, the quicker the combination is effected, and the more exposed to water, the greater is the quantity of nitrous acid and the less of nitric that is formed. To use nitrous gas for the purpose of eudiometry therefore, we must attempt to form nitric acid or nitrous wholly, and without a mixture of the other. Of these the former appears from my experiments to be most easily and most accurately effected. In order to this a narrow tube is necessary ; one that is just wide enough to let air pass water without requiring the tube to be agitated, is IO Dalton. best. Let little more nitrous gas than is sufficient to form nitric acid be admitted to the oxygenous gas ; let no agitation be used ; and as soon as the diminution appears to be over for a moment let the residuary gas be transferred to another tube, and it will remain without any further diminution of consequence. Then T 7 of the loss will be due to oxygen. The transferring is necessary to prevent the nitric acid formed and combined with the water, from absorbing the remainder of the nitrous gas to form nitrous acid. Sulphuret of lime is a good test of the proportion of oxygen in a given mixture, provided the liquid be not more than 20 or 30 per cent, for the gas (atmospheric air) ; if the liquid exceed this, there is a portion of azotic gas imbibed somewhat uncertain in quantity. Volta's eudiometer is very accurate as well as elegant and expeditious: according to Monge, TOO oxygen require 196 measures of hydrogen; according to Davy 192 ; but from the most attentive observations of my own, 185 are sufficient. In atmospheric air I always find 60 per cent, diminution when fired with an excess of hydrogen ; that is, 100 common air with 60 hydrogen, become 100 after the explosion, and no oxygen is found in the residuum ; here 21 oxygen take 39 hydrogen. 2. Of the Weight of the Aqueous Vapour Atmosphere. I have, in a former essay, (Manchester Mem. vol. 5. p. 2, page 559.) given a table of the force of vapour in vacuo for every degree of temperature, determined by experiment ; and in the sequel of the essay, have shown that the force of vapour in the atmosphere is the very same as in vacuo, when they are both at their utmost for any given temperature. To find the force of aqueous vapour in the atmosphere, therefore, we have nothing Proportion of Gases in the A tmosphere. 1 1 more to do than to find that degree of cold at which it begins to be condensed, and opposite to it in the table above mentioned, will be found the force of vapour. From the various facts mentioned in the essay it is obvious, that vapour contracts no chemical union with any of the gases in the atmosphere ; this fact has since been enforced in the Annales de Chimie, vol. xlii. by Clement and Desorme. M. De Saussure found by an excellent experiment, that dry air of 64 will admit so much vapour as to increase its elasticity, T \. This I have repeated nearly in his manner, and found a similar result. But the table he has given us of aqueous vapour at other temperatures is very far wrong, especially at temperatures distant from 64. The numbers were not the result of direct experi- ment, like the one above. If we could obtain the temperatures of all parts of the earth's surface, for any given time, a mean of them would probably be 57 or 58. Now if we may suppose the force of vapour equivalent to that of 55, at a medium, it will, from the table, be equal to .443 of mercury ; or, nearly T ^ of the whole atmosphere. This it will be perceived is calculated to be the weight of vapour in the whole atmosphere of the earth. If that incumbent over any place at any time be required, it may be found as directed above. 3. Of the Weight of the Carbonic Acid Atmosphere. From some observations of Humboldt, I was led to expect about yj^ part of the weight of the atmosphere to be carbonic acid gas : but I soon found that the propor- tion was immensely overrated. From repeated experi- ments, all nearly agreeing in their results, and made at different seasons of the year, I have found, that if a glass vessel filled with 102,400 grains of rain water 12 Dalton. be emptied in the open air, and 125 grains of strong lime water be poured in, and the mouth then closed; by sufficient time and agitation, the whole of the lime water is just saturated by the acid gas it finds in that volume of air. But 125 grains of the lime water used require 70 grain measures of carbonic acid gas to saturate it ; there- fore, the 102,400 grain measures of common air contain 70 of carbonic acid ; or yj 1 ^ of the whole. The weight of the carbonic acid atmosphere then is to that of the whole compound as i : 1460 ; but the weight of carbonic acid gas in a given portion of air at the earth's surface, is nearly y^ 1 ^ of the whole ; because the specific gravity of the gas is \\ that of common air. I have since found that the air in an assembly, in which two hundred people had breathed for two hours, with the windows and doors shut, contained little more than i per cent, of carbonic acid gas. Having now determined the force with which each atmosphere presses on the earth's surface, or in other words, its weight ; it remains next to enquire into their specific gravities. These may be seen in the following Table. Atmospheric air, - i.ooo Azotic gas, .966 Oxygenous gas, 1.127 Carbonic acid gas, - 1.50 Aqueous vapour, - .700 Hydrogenous gas, - .077* Kirwan and Lavoisier are my authorities for these numbers; except oxygenous gas and aqueous vapour. * The specific gravity of hydrogen must be rated too low : if 100 oxygen require 185 hydrogen by measure, according to this 89 oxygen would require only 1 1 hydrogen to form water ; whereas 85 require 15. Hydrogen ought to be found about T ^ part of the weight of common air. Proportion of Gases in the Atmosphere. 13 For the former I am indebted to Mr Davy's Chemical Researches ; his number is something greater than theirs : I prefer it, because, being determined with at least equal attention to accuracy with the others, it has this further claim for credit, that 21 parts of gas of this specific gravity, mixed with 79 parts of azotic gas, make a com- pound of exactly the same specific gravity as the atmosphere, as they evidently ought to do, setting aside the unfounded notion of their forming a chemical com- pound. The specific gravity of aqueous vapour I have determined myself both by analytic and synthetic methods, after the manner of De Saussure : that is, by abstracting aqueous vapour of a known force from a given quantity of air, and weighing the water obtained and admitting a given weight of water to dry air and comparing the loss with the increased elasticity. De Saussure makes the specific gravity to be ,71 or ,75 ; but he used caustic alkali as the absorbent, which would extract the carbonic acid as well as the aqueous vapour from the air. From the experiments of Pictet and Watt, I deduce the specific gravity of aqueous vapour to be ,61 and ,67 respectively. Upon the whole, therefore, it is probable that ,7 is very nearly accurate. We have now sufficient data to form tables answering to the two first objects of our enquiry. I. Table of the Weights of the different Gases constituting the Atmosphere. Inch of Mercury. Azotic gas 23.36 Oxygenous gas - 6.18 Aqueous vapour -44 Carbonic acid gas .02 30.00 14 Dalton. II. Table of the proportional Weights of the different Gases in a given volume of Atmospheric Air, taken at the Surface of the Earth. Per Cent. Azotic gas 75.55 Oxygenous gas - 23.32 Aqueous vapour 1.03* Carbonic acid gas - .10 100.00 III. On the Proportion of Gases at different Elevations. M. Berthollet seems to think that the lower strata of the atmosphere ought to contain more oxygen than the upper, because of the greater specific gravity of oxygenous gas, and the slight affinity of the two gases for each other. (See Annal. de Chimie, Tom. 34. page 85.) As I am unable to conceive even the possibility of two gases being held together by affinity, unless their particles unite so as to form one centre of repulsion out of two or more (in which case they become one gas) I cannot see why rarefaction should either decrease or increase this supposed affinity. I have little doubt, however, as to the fact of oxygenous gas observing a diminishing ratio in ascending ; for, the atmospheres being independent on each other, their densities at different heights must be regulated by their specific gravities. Hence, if we take the azotic atmosphere as a standard, the oxygenous and the carbonic acid will observe a decreasing ratio to it in ascending, and the aqueous vapour an increasing one. The specific gravity of oxygenous and azotic gases being as 7 to 6 nearly, their diminution in density will be the same at heights reciprocally as their specific gravities. * The proportion of aqueous vapour must be understood to be variable for any one place : the others are permanent or nearly so. Absorption of Gases by Water, &c. 15 Hence it would be found, that at the height of Mount Blanc (nearly three English miles) the ratio of oxygenous gas to azotic in a given volume of air, would be nearly as 20 to 80 ; consequently it follows that at any ordinary heights the difference in the proportions will be scarcely if at all perceptible. * ON THE ABSORPTION OF GASES BY WATER AND OTHER LIQUIDS. BY JOHN DALTON.f Read Oct. 21, 1803. i. T F a quantity of pure water be boiled rapidly for a 1 short time in a vessel with a narrow aperture, or if it be subjected to the air-pump, the air exhausted from the receiver containing the water, and then be briskly agitated for some time, very nearly tbj.e whole of any- gas. the water may contain, will be extricated from it. 2. If a quantity of water thus freed from air be agitated in any kind of gas, not chemically uniting with water, it will absorb its bulk of the gas, or otherwise a part of it equal to some one of the following fractions, namely, |, T7> FI> -ifs* &c - these bein & the cubes f the reciprocals of the natural numbers i, 2, 3, &c. or - 3 , - 3 , - 3 , - 3 , &c. the same gas always being absorbed in the same propor- * Air brought from the summit of Helvelyn, in Cumberland (noo yards above the sea Barometer being 26.60) in July 1804, gave no perceptible differences from the air taken in Manchester. M. Gay- Lussac determines the constitution of air brought from an elevation of four miles to be the same as that at the earth's surface. t From the Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, Second Series, Volume I., 1805, pp. 271-287. The table appended to this paper is Dalton's first table of atomic weights. i6 Dalton. tion, as exhibited in the following table : It must be understood that the quantity of gas is to be measured at the pressure and temperature with which the impregnation is effected. Bulk absorbed, the bulk of water being unity. ?-' Carbonic acid gas, sul- phuretted hydrogen, nitrous oxide.* i _ i ?~* Olefiant gas, of the Dutch chemists. i _ i ?~^ Oxygenous gas, nitrous gas,f carburetted hydrogen gas, from stagnant water. i _ i ?-* Azotic gas, hydrogenous gas, carbonic oxide. i_i ~3~T2T None discovered. 3. The gas thus absorbed may be recovered from the * According to Mr William Henry's experiments, water does not imbibe quite its bulk of nitrous oxide ; in one or two instances with me it has come very near it : The apparent deviation of this gas, may be owing to the difficulty of ascertaining the exact degree of its impurity. t About -fa of nitrous gas is usually absorbed ; and ^ T is recover- able : This difference is owing to the residuum of oxygen in the water, each measure of which takes 3^ of nitrous gas to saturate it, when in water. Perhaps it may be found that nitrous gas usually contains a small portion of nitrous oxide. Absorption of Gases by Water, &c. 17 water the same in quantity and quality as it entered, by the means pointed out in the ist article. 4. If a quantity of water free from air be agitated with a mixture of two or more gases (such as atmospheric air) the water will absorb portions of each gas the same as if they were presented to it separately in their proper density. Ex. gr. Atmospheric air, consisting of 79 parts azotic gas, and 21 parts oxygenous gas, per cent. Water absorbs T T of T 7 ^j-, azotic gas= 1.234 2T o f TTO oxygen gas = .778 Sum, per cent. 2.012 5. If water impregnated with any one gas (as hydro- genous) be agitated with another gas equally absorbable (as azotic) there will apparently be no absorption of the latter gas ; just as much gas being found after agitation as was introduced to the water; but upon examination the residuary gas will be found a mixture of the two, and the parts of each, in the water, will be exactly propor- tional to those out of the water. 6. If water impregnated with any one gas be agitated with another gas less or more absorbable ; there will apparently be an increase or diminution of the latter; but upon examination the residuary gas will be found a mixture of the two, and the proportions agreeable to article 4. 7. If a quantity of water in a phial having a ground stopper very accurately adapted, be agitated with any gas, or mixture of gases, till the due share has entered the water ; then, if the stopper be secured, the phial may be exposed to any variation of temperature^ without disturb- ing the equilibrium : That is, the quantity of gas in the water will remain the same whether it be exposed to heat or cold, if the stopper be air-tight. B 1 8 Dalton. N.B. The phial ought not to be near full of water, and the temperature should be between 32 and 212. 8. If water be impregnated with one gas (as oxygenous), and another gas, having an affinity for the former (as nitrous), be agitated along with it ; the absorption of the latter gas will be greater, by the quantity necessary to saturate the former, than it would have been if the water had been free from gas.* 9. Most liquids free from viscidity, such as acids, alcohol, liquid sulphurets, and saline solutions in water, absorb the same quantity of gases as pure water ; except they have an affinity for the gas, such as the sulphurets for oxygen, &c. The preceding articles contain the principal facts neces- sary to establish the theory of absorption : Those that follow are of a subordinate nature, and partly deducible as corollaries to them. 10. Pure distilled water, rain and spring water usually contain nearly their due share of atmospheric air : if not, they quickly acquire that share by agitation in it, and lose any other gas they may be impregnated with. It is remarkable however that water by stagnation, in certain circumstances, loses part or all of its oxygen, notwithstand- ing its constant exposition to the atmosphere. This I have uniformly found to be the case in my large wooden pneumatic trough, containing about 8 gallons, or i^ cubic foot of water. Whenever this is replenished with toler- ably pure rain water, it contains its share of atmospheric * One part of oxygenous gas requires 3.4 of nitrous gas to saturate it in water. It is agreeable to this that the rapid mixture of oxy- genous and nitrous gas over a broad surface of water, occasions a greater diminution than otherwise. In fact, the nitrous acid is formed this way ; whereas, when water is not present, the nitric acid is formed, which requires just half the quantity of nitrous gas, as I have lately ascertained. Absorption of Gases by Water , &c. 19 air ; but in process of time it becomes deficient of oxygen : In three months the whole surface has been covered with a pellicle, and no oxygenous gas whatever was found in the water. It was grown offensive, but not extremely so ; it had not been contaminated with any material portion of metallic or sulphureous mixtures, or any other article to which the effect could be ascribed.'* The quantity of azotic gas is not materially diminished by stagnation, if at all. These circumstances, not being duly noticed, have been the source of great diversity in the results of differ- ent philosophers upon the quantity and quality of atmo- spheric air in water. By article 4, it appears that atmospheric air expelled from water ought to have 38 per cent, oxygen ; whereas by this article air may be expelled from water that shall contain from 38 to o per cent, of oxygen. The disappearance of oxygenous gas in water, I presume, must be owing to some impurities in the water which combine with the oxygen. Pure rain water that had stood more than a year in an earthenware bottle had lost none of its oxygen. 11. If water free from air be agitated with a small portion of atmospheric air (as -^ of its bulk) the residuum of such air will have proportionally less oxygen than the original : If we take ^, as above, then the residuum will have only 1 7 per cent, oxygen ; agreeably to the prin- ciple established in article 4. This circumstance accounts for the observations made by Dr Priestley, and Mr William Henry, that water absorbs oxygen in preference to azot. 12. If a tall glass vessel containing a small portion of gas be inverted into a deep trough of water and the gas thus confined by the glass, and the water be briskly agkated, it will gradually disappear. * It was drawn from a leaden cistern. 22 Dalton. residuary gas was ^ pure, then it was inferred that water would take its bulk of that gas. The principle was the same in using the phial ; only a small quantity of the gas was admitted, and the agitation was longer. There are two very important facts contained in the second article. The first is, that the quantity of gas absorbed is as the density or pressure. This was dis- covered by Mr Wm. Henry, before either he or I had formed any theory on the subject. The other is that the density of the gas in the water has a special relation to that out of the water, the distance of the particles within being always some multiple of that without : Thus, in the case of carbonic acid, &c. the dis- tance within and without is the same, or the gas within the water is of the same density as without ; in defiant gas the distance of the particles in the water is twice that without ; in oxygenous gas, &c. the distance is just three times as great within as without ; and in azotic, &c. it is four times. This fact was the result of my own enquiry. The former of these, I think, decides the effect to be mechanical ; and the latter seems to point to the principle on which the equilibrium is adjusted. The facts noticed in the 4th, 5th and 6th articles, were investigated a priori from the mechanical hypothesis, and the notion of the distinct agency of elastic fluids when mixed together. The results were found entirely to agree with both, or as nearly as could be expected from experi- ments of such nature. The facts mentioned in the yth article, are of great im- portance in a theoretic view ; for, if the quantity of gas absorbed depend upon mechanical principles, it cannot be affected by temperature in confined air, as the mechanical effect of the external and internal air are alike increased by heat, and the density not at all affected in those circumstances. I have tried the experiments in a Absorption of Gases by Water, &c. 23 considerable variety of temperature without perceiving any deviation from the principle. It deserves further attention. If water be, as pointed out by this essay, a mere receptacle of gases, it cannot affect their affinities : hence what is observed in the 8th article is too obvious to need explanation. And if we find the absorption of gases to arise not from a chemical but a mechanical cause, it may be expected that all liquids having an equal fluidity with water, will absorb like portions of gas. In several liquids I have tried no perceptible difference has been found ; but this deserves further investigation. After what has been observed, it seems unnecessary to add any explanation of the loth and following articles. Theory of the Absorption of Gases by Water, &c. From the facts developed in the preceding articles, the following theory of the absorption of gases by water seems deducible. 1. All gases that enter into water and other liquids by means of pressure, and are wholly disengaged again by the removal of that pressure, are mechanically mixed with the liquid, and not chemically combined with it. 2. Gases so mixed with water, &c. retain their elas- ticity or repulsive power amongst their own particles, just the same in the water as out of it, the intervening water having no other influence in this respect than a mere vacuum. 3. Each gas is retained in water by the pressure of gas of its own kind incumbent on its surface abstractedly con- sidered, no other gas with which it may be mixed having any permanent influence in this respect. 4. When water has absorbed its bulk of carbonic acid gas, &c., the gas does not press on the water at all, but presses on the containing vessel just as if no water were 24 Dalton. in. When water has absorbed its proper quantity of oxygenous gas, &c. that is, -^ of its bulk, the exterior gas presses on the surface of the water with f f of its force, and on the internal gas with ^ T of its force, which force presses upon the containing vessel and not on the water. With azotic and hydrogenous gas the proportions are ff and 3^ respectively. When water contains no gas, its surface must support the whole pressure of any gas admitted to it, till the gas has, in part, forced its way into the water. 5. A particle of gas pressing on the surface of water is analogous to a single shot pressing upon the summit of a square pile of them. As the shot distributes its pressure equally amongst all the individuals forming the lowest stratum of the pile, so the particle of gas distributes its pressure equally amongst every successive horizontal stratum of particles of water downwards till it reaches the sphere of influence of another particle of gas. For in- stance ; let any gas press with a given force on the surface of water, and let the distance of the particles of gas from each other be to those of water as i o to i ; then each particle of gas must divide its force equally amongst 100 particles of water, as follows : It exerts its immediate force upon 4 particles of water ; those 4 press upon 9, the 9 upon 1 6, and so on according to the order of square numbers, till 100 particles of water have the force distri- buted amongst them ; and in the same stratum each square of 100, having its incumbent particle of gas, the water below this stratum is uniformly pressed by the gas, and consequently has not its equilibrium disturbed by that pressure. 6. When water has absorbed ^ T of its bulk of any gas, the stratum of gas on the surface of the water presses with 7- of its force on the water, in the manner pointed out in the last article, and with ^ T of its force on the uppermost Absorption of Gases by Water, &c. 25 stratum of gas in the water : The distance of the two strata of gas must be nearly 2 7 times the distance of the particles in the incumbent atmosphere and 9 times the distance of the particles in the water. This compara- tively great distance of the inner and outer atmosphere arises from the great repulsive power of the latter, on account of its superior density, or its presenting 9 particles of surface to the other i . When / T is absorbed the dis- tance of the atmospheres becomes 64 times the distance of two particles in the outer, or 16 times that of the inner. 7. An equilibrium between the outer and inner atmo- spheres can be established in no other circumstance than that of the distance of the particles of one atmosphere being the same or some multiple of that of the other ; and it is probable the multiple cannot be more than 4. For in this case the distance of the inner and outer atmo- spheres is such as to make the perpendicular force of each particle of the former on those particles of the latter that are immediately subject to its influence, physically speak- ing, equal ; and the same may be observed of the small lateral force. 8. The greatest difficulty attending the mechanical hypothesis, arises from different gases observing differ- ent laws. Why does water not admit its bulk of every kind of gas alike? This question I have duly con- sidered, and though I am not yet able to satisfy myself completely, I am nearly persuaded that the cir- cumstance depends upon the weight and number of the ultimate particles of the several gases : those whose par- ticles are lightest and single being least absorbable, and the others more according as they increase in weight and complexity.* An inquiry into the relative weights of the * Subsequent experience renders this conjecture less probable. 26 Dalton. ultimate particles of bodies is a subject, as far as I know, entirely new : I have lately been prosecuting this enquiry with remarkable success. The principle cannot be entered upon in this paper ; but I shall just subjoin the results, as far as they appear to be ascertained by my experiments. Table of the relative weights of the ultimate particles of gaseous and other bodies, Hydrogen - i Azot - 4.2 Carbone - 4.3 Ammonia - - 5.2 Oxygen - 5.5 Water - - 6.5 Phosphorus - 7.2 Phosphuretted hydrogen - 8.2 Nitrous gas - - 9-3 Ether - 9.6 Gaseous oxide of carbone - - 9.8 Nitrous oxide - 13.7 Sulphur 14.4 Nitric acid - 15.2 Sulphuretted hydrogen - - 15.4 Carbonic acid - 15.3 Alcohol - 15.1 Sulphureous acid - - 19.9 Sulphuric acid 25.4 Carburetted hydrogen from stag, water - 6.3 Olefiant gas - 5-3 / Constitution of Bodies. 27 ON THE CONSTITUTION OF BODIES. BY JOHN DALTON* THERE are three distinctions in the kinds of bodies, or three states, which have more especially claimed the attention of philosophical chemists ; namely, those which are marked by the terms elastic fluids, liquids, and solids. A very familiar instance is exhibited to us in water, of a body, which, in certain circumstances, is capable of assuming all the three states. In steam we recognise a perfectly elastic fluid, in water a perfect liquid, and in ice a complete solid. These observations have tacitly led to the conclusion which seems universally adopted, that all bodies of sensible magnitude, whether liquid or solid, are constituted of a vast number of extremely small particles, or atoms of matter bound together by a force of attrac- tion, which is more or less powerful according to circum- stances, and which as it endeavours to prevent their separation, is very properly called in that view, attraction of cohesion ; but as it collects them from a dispersed state (as from steam into water) it is called, attraction of aggre- gation, or more simply, affinity. Whatever names it may go by, they still signify one and the same power. It is not my design to call in question this conclusion, which appears completely satisfactory; but to show that we have hitherto made no use of it, and that the consequence of the neglect, has been a very obscure view of chemical agency, which is daily growing more so in proportion to the new lights attempted to be thrown upon it. The opinions I more particularly allude to, are those of Berthollet on the Laws of chemical affinity ; such as that chemical agency is proportional to the mass, and that in all chemical unions, there exist insensible grada- * From A New System of Chemical Philosophy, Manchester 1808, pp. 141-143. 28 Dalton. tions in the proportions of the constituent principles. The inconsistence of these opinions, both with reason and observation, cannot, I think, fail to strike every one who takes a proper view of the phenomena. Whether the ultimate particles of a body, such as water, are all alike, that is, of the same figure, weight, &c. is a question of some importance. From what is known, we have no reason to apprehend a diversity in these par- ticulars : if it does exist in water, it must equally exist in the elements constituting water, namely, hydrogen and oxygen. Now it is scarcely possible to conceive how the aggregates of dissimilar particles should be so uniformly the same. If some of the particles of water were heavier than others, if a parcel of the liquid on any occasion were constituted principally of these heavier particles, it must be supposed to affect the specific gravity of the mass, a circumstance not known. Similar observations may be made on other substances. Therefore we may conclude that the ultimate particles of all homogeneous bodies are perfectly alike in weight, figure, &c. In other words, &*y|particle of water is like every other particle of water ; every particle of hydrogen is like every other particle of hydrogen, &c. ON CHEMICAL SYNTHESIS. BY JOHN DALTON.* WHEN any body exists in the elastic state, its ultimate particles are separated from each other to a much greater distance than in any other state ; each particle occupies the centre of a comparatively large sphere, and supports its dignity by keeping all the rest, * From A New System of Chemical Philosophy, Manchester 1808, pp. 211-216 and 219-220. Chemical Synthesis. 29 which by their gravity, or otherwise are disposed to encroach upon it, at a respectful distance. When we attempt to conceive the number of particles in an atmo- sphere, it is somewhat like attempting to conceive the number of stars in the universe ; we are confounded with the thought. But if we limit the subject, by taking a given volume of any gas, we seem persuaded that, let the divisions be ever so minute, the number of particles must be finite ; just as in a given space of the universe, the number of stars and planets cannot be infinite. Chemical analysis and synthesis go no farther than to the separation of particles one from another, and to their re- union. No new creation or destruction of matter is within the reach qf chemical agency. We might as well attempt to introduce a new planet into the solar system, or to annihil- ate one already in existence, as to create or destroy a particle of hydrogen. All the changes we can produce, consist in separating particles that are in a state of cohesion or combin- ation, and joining those that were previously at a distance. In all chemical investigations, it has justly been con- sidered an important object to ascertain the relative weights of the simples which constitute a compound. But unfortunately the enquiry has terminated here; whereas from the relative weights in the mass, the relative weights of the ultimate particles or atoms of the bodies might have been inferred, from which their number and weight in various other compounds would appear, in order to assist and to guide future investigations, and to correct their results. Now it is one great object of this work, to show the importance and advantage of ascertain- ing the relative weights of the ultimate particles ; both of simple and compound bodies, the number of simple element- ary particles ivhich constitute one compound particle, and the number of less compound particles which enter into the formation of one more compound particle. 30 Da/ton. If there are two bodies, A and B, which are disposed to combine, the following is the order in which the com- binations may take place, beginning with the most simple : namely, I atom of A + I atom of B = atom of C, binary. 1 atom of A + 2 atoms of B = atom of D, ternary. 2 atoms of A + I atom of B = atom of E, ternary. I atom of A + 3 atoms of B = atom of F, quaternary. 3 atoms of A + I atom of B = atom of G, quaternary. &c. &c. The following general rules may be adopted as guides in all our investigations respecting chemical synthesis. ist. When only one combination of two bodies can be obtained, it must be presumed to be a binary one, unless some cause appear to the contrary. 2d. When two combinations are observed,' they must be presumed to be a binary and a ternary. 3d. When three combinations are obtained, we may expect one to be a binary, and the other two ternary. 4th. When four combinations are observed, we should expect one binary, two ternary, and one quaternary, &c. 5th. A binary compound should always be specifically heavier than the mere mixture of its two ingredients. 6th. A ternary compound should be specifically heavier than the mixture of a binary and a simple, which would, if combined, constitute it ; c. yth. The above rules and observations equally apply, when two bodies, such as C and D, D and E, &c. are combined. From the application of these rules, to the chemical facts already well ascertained, we deduce the following conclusions ; ist. That water is a binary compound of hydrogen and oxygen, and the relative weights of the two elementary atoms are as i : 7, nearly ; 2d. That ammonia is a binary compound of hydrogen and azote, and the relative weights of the two atoms are as 1:5, nearly ; 3d. That nitrous gas is a binary compound of azote and Chemical Synthesis. 31 oxygen, the atoms of which weigh 5 and 7 respectively ; that nitric acid is a binary or ternary compound accord- ing as it is derived, and consists of one atom of azote and two of oxygen, together weighing 1 9 ; that nitrous oxide is a compound similar to nitric acid, and consists of one atom of oxygen and two of azote, weighing 17 ; that nitrous acid is a binary compound of nitric acid and nitrous gas, weighing 31 ; that oxynitric acid is a binary compound of nitric acid and oxygen, weighing 26 ; 4th. That carbonic oxide is a binary compound, consisting of one atom of charcoal, and one of oxygen, together weigh- ing nearly 1 2 ; that carbonic acid is a ternary compound (but sometimes binary) consisting of one atom of char- coal, and two of oxygen, weighing 1 9 ; &c. &c. In all these cases the weights are expressed in atoms of hydrogen, each of which is denoted by unity. In the sequel, the facts and experiments from which these conclusions are derived, will be detailed ; as well as a great variety of others from which are inferred the con- stitution and weight of the ultimate particles of the prin- cipal acids, the alkalis, the earths, the metals, the metallic oxides and sulphurets, the long train of neutral salts, and in short, all the chemical compounds which have hitherto obtained a tolerably good analysis. Several of the con- clusions will be supported by original experiments. From the novelty as well as importance of the ideas suggested in this chapter, it is deemed expedient to give plates, exhibiting the mode of combination in some of the more simple cases. A specimen of these accompanies this first part. The elements or atoms of such bodies as are conceived at present to be simple, are denoted by a small circle, with some distinctive mark ; and the com- binations consist in the juxta-position of two or more of these ; when three or more particles of elastic fluids are combined together in one, it is to be supposed that the Dalton. particles of the same kind repel each other, and therefore take their stations accordingly. ELEMENTS . 045 O