THE HOWE READINGS ON INSURANCE No. 6 
 
 A SHORT SKETCH OF 
 THE HISTORY AND PRINCIPLES OF 
 
 MARINE INSURANCE 
 
 By William D. Winter 
 
 THE INSURANCE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK 
 
 INCORPORATED 
 
 January 1935 
 
A SHORT SKETCH 
 
 OF THB 
 
 HISTORY AND PRINCIPLES 
 
 OF 
 
 MARINE 
 INSURANCE 
 
 BY 
 
 WILLIAM D. WINTER 
 
 PRESIDENT 
 
 OF THE ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 
 OF NEW YORK 
 
 ' • ■ $ .... 
 
 . \ -V- -V ' c X *!; : 
 
 ; >>: :,. :,, : »*"»%^ •? 
 
 / my fortune for it, 
 
 My ventures are not in one bottom trusted, 
 Nor to one place; nor is my whole estate 
 Upon the fortune of this present year: 
 Therefore my merchandise makes me not sad. 
 
 — The Merchant of Venice 
 
 Second Edition 
 
 THE INSURANCE SOCIETY 
 OF NEW YORK 
 
 INCORPORATED 
 
 1935 
 
The printing of the first edition of this 
 publication in 1925 was made 
 possible by the generosity of 
 
 zMrs. Cjeorge £. Jfowe 
 
 who gave to The Insurance Society of 
 NewYork a fund in memory of her husband 
 GEORGE C. HOWE, 1852-1918, for 
 fifty years identified with the fire in- 
 surance business and at all times 
 showing a keen interest in 
 educational work 
 
 The Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company 
 has generously contributed the cost of 
 this Second Edition 
 
 Copyright, 1935, by 
 THE INSURANCE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK 
 
 INCORPORATED 
 
KB 
 
 /Hi robur et aes triplex 
 circa pectus erat, qui fragilem truci 
 
 commisit pelago ratem 
 primus, nec timuit praecipitem Africum 
 
 decertantem Aquilonibus 
 nec tristes Hyadas nec rabiem Noti, 
 
 quo non arbiter Hadriae 
 maior, tollere seu ponere vult freta. 
 
 —ODES OF HORACE III 
 
 Heart of oak and triple fold 
 Of brass engirt his bosom bold, 
 Who first to ocean's ruthless might 
 Trusted a bark, thing frail and slight ; 
 Nor at the war of winds did quail, 
 Though southern blast met northern gale 
 Nor feared the gloomy Hyades, 
 Nor maddened Notus, — lord of seas, 
 Sfnce Hadria knows no stronger will 
 To lift her waves, or bid be still. 
 
 —A. S. AGLEN, 
 
 Archdeacon of St. Andrews 
 
 309058 
 
A map of the world as then imagined prior to 
 the first voyage of Columbus. Printed at 
 Brescia, May 31, 1485, by Boninus de Bonini9. 
 
 Reprinted by permission of 
 Mr. James Tregaskis 
 
THE HISTORY AND PRINCIPLES OF 
 MARINE INSURANCE 
 
 CHAPTER I 
 
 ccording to the chronology of the Bible story of Creation, 
 
 the seas were formed about 4000 B. C. Fifteen hundred 
 
 * ^years later the art of shipbuilding had so far progressed that 
 Noah was enabled to build the Ark in which to outride the Flood. 
 This vessel was of no mean size, being a three deck ship and, ac- 
 cording to the story, pitched without and within, indicating that 
 the art of caulking vessels to make them water-tight was well un- 
 derstood. 
 
 In 1689 B. C, Jacob in blessing his children, says, "Zebulun 
 shall dwell at the haven of the sea; and he shall be for an haven 
 of ships." (Genesis 50-13), and again in Numbers 24-24, the 
 statement is made that "Ships shall come from the coast of 
 Chittim and shall afflict Asshur and shall afflict Eber." Some- 
 what later the prophetess Deborah laments that "Dan remain in 
 ships" (Judges 5-17), while in 1000 B. C. "King Solomon made 
 a navy of ships in Ezrongeber" (1 Kings 9-26). Repeated refer- 
 ence is made to ships of Tarshish which were probably Phoenician 
 trading vessels, plying between Tyre and Tartessus in Spain. 
 All of these references, together with numerous others which 
 might be taken from profane history, indicate that man, soon after 
 his creation, found that the seas afforded an easy avenue of com- 
 munication between distant places. He quickly learned, however, 
 that while the seas could serve him they also could master him. 
 
 Birth of Insurance 
 
 A thousand years before the Christian era an active overseas 
 commerce was conducted in the Red Sea and the Mediterranean 
 Sea. The severe storms in these comparatively sheltered waters 
 proved more than a match for the skill of the ancient shipbuilders, 
 and many a vessel with its cargo succumbed to the perils of the 
 deep. The losses entailed, especially those sacrificial losses caused 
 by jettison in order to lighten and save the ship, caused merchants 
 to seek some method of sharing these losses, — and insurance was 
 born. Not insurance as we know it today, but the germ principle 
 
6 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 of the distribution of loss over the many, in order that the burden 
 of loss may not oppress the few, appears in general average, the 
 method devised by these ancient merchants to distribute losses due 
 to jettison. 
 
 The following concrete example will illustrate the method of 
 distributing such loss, as provided in general average. A ship of 
 Tarshish with its crew of oarsmen leaves Tyre laden with a 
 diversified cargo destined for the western Mediterranean. The 
 merchants whose goods are aboard the ship travel with it, to sell 
 their wares and with the proceeds to buy a return cargo. There 
 being no supervision of loading and human nature being then 
 much as it is today, ships were probably overloaded, safe enough 
 in calm weather, but the minute storms arose in danger of sink- 
 ing. Jettison in such case was the natural remedy and was 
 immediately applied. 
 
 Origin of General Average — Jettison 
 
 No merchant would wish his goods sacrificed, but in an 
 emergency there is little time for debate and the most accessible 
 goods would be cast overboard. In many eases, however, valua- 
 ble time was lost in quarrelling over whose goods should be 
 jettisoned and to prevent these delays and in the common interest, 
 the system was devised of assessing the value of the jettisoned 
 goods pro-rata over the entire value of ship and cargo including 
 the jettisoned goods. That this system was devised early in the 
 history of overseas commerce is attested by the fact that in the 
 maritime law code promulgated by the Rhodians in 916 B. C. 
 general average is recognized as a maritime custom. That this 
 system of distribution of loss is sound is proved by the fact that 
 the principle of general average, greatly broadened to meet modern 
 conditions, persists to the present and is part of the law of every 
 maritime nation, while the modern marine policy affords protec- 
 tion against losses of a general average nature. 
 
 The limited protection given by this ancient system of dis- 
 tributing losses due to jettison could not for long satisfy the 
 demands of a growing commerce. It is not surprising, therefore, 
 to find at a somewhat later period a well established system for 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 7 
 
 furnishing indemnity for losses caused by the destruction or dam- 
 age of ships and their cargoes. Strangely enough, this method of 
 insurance, which reached a high degree of development in Ancient 
 Greece and Rome, was quite the reverse of our present system of 
 insurance by premium payments. It was a system devised prob- 
 ably by the ancient money lenders to gain the business of those 
 engaged in overseas commerce. 
 
 Bottomry and Respondentia Bonds 
 
 This system of insurance was conducted in the following way. 
 The owner of a ship, or a merchant who had a cargo of grain or 
 other goods for shipment, being in need of funds to finance his 
 operation, would seek a loan of his banker on the security of his 
 ship or of the cargo. If the ship successfully completed its voy- 
 age, the owner would earn his freight money and the merchant 
 would have his goods at destination where they could be readily 
 converted into cash and the banker's loan repaid. If, however, 
 disaster overtook the venture, probably neither the ship-owner nor 
 the merchant would be in a position to repay his banker. The 
 modern banker who loans money on the hull of a vessel by mort- 
 gage or on a cargo against the bill of lading would be in a similar 
 position were it not for the protection of the marine insurance 
 policy insuring the hull of the vessel or the cargo represented by 
 the bill of lading. There being in Ancient Greece and Rome no 
 insurance as we now know it, the banker in many cases was 
 subjected to the risk of the vessel and its cargo being lost and the 
 borrower being unable to take up his loan. That he might re- 
 ceive compensation for carrying this additional risk, not of a bank- 
 ing nature, the banker definitely assumed the risk of the loss of 
 vessel and cargo under a form of bond, known as a bottomry bond 
 when the ship was pledged and a respondentia bond when the loan 
 was against cargo, which stipulated that the loan was to be repaid 
 only in the event of the safe arrival of the ship and cargo. For 
 these loans maritime interest was charged, equivalent to the usual 
 rate of interest plus a rate judged by the banker to be equivalent 
 to the risk of the loss of ship and cargo on the voyage in question. 
 The system of loaning money under this form of maritime bond 
 was so extensively carried on in Ancient Athens that the bankers, 
 
8 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 as a group, had dispatch boats at sea, seeking to learn of threaten- 
 ing storms or of wars or of other dangers which might threaten 
 ships or cargoes on which they had made loans. 
 
 It will readily be seen that but one step more was required to 
 create insurance in its modern form, namely, the separation of the 
 maritime risk from the banker's loan and the charging of the in- 
 creased interest as a premium, instead of as part of the interest on 
 the loan. 
 
 Insurance by bottomry bond continued for many hundreds of 
 years. Although there is little definite knowledge of what took 
 place during the Dark Ages, still there are indications that com- 
 merce expanded during that period. Knowledge of the heavens 
 and of the seas grew rapidly, permitting more certain navigation, 
 and overseas expeditions, such as the crusades to the Holy Land, 
 created new demands for goods. Yet it was not until late in the 
 12th century that any suggestion is discovered of insurance being 
 made by premium payments. 
 
 Beginnings of Insurance 
 
 While the evidence is slight, it is probable that insurance in its 
 modern form was first effected by the Jews when they were 
 banished from France in A. D. 1182. It is quite certain that the 
 Jews during this exodus invented the bill of exchange, and it 
 would not be surprising if the companion document, the insurance 
 policy, was created at the same time. Thus to this resourceful 
 race, which has been through all ages and in all countries such a 
 dominant commercial factor, probably belongs the credit of de- 
 vising the germ idea of insurance by premium payments, which 
 has developed to such a remarkable extent in succeeding centuries. 
 
 The Lombards 
 
 The Lombard merchants of Italy quickly grasped the idea of 
 insurance by premium payments and they, in their intercourse 
 with the Hansa merchants of the Baltic Sea, probably introduced 
 this new method of insurance to them. The practice of issuing 
 bottomry bonds was still carried on, and from the various state 
 edicts endeavoring to control the issuance of these bonds, it is 
 quite apparent that abuses had crept into their use. 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 9 
 
 Once the idea of insurance by premium payments was under- 
 stood, the use of bottomry bonds declined as a form of insurance. 
 Bottomry bonds in a different form, however, continued to be 
 used by masters of ships in distress at distant ports as security for 
 raising funds otherwise unavailable, with which to make repairs 
 and thus enable the pledged vessel to complete its voyage. With 
 the improvement in communication between distant places by 
 means of the cable and wireless, the use of bottomry bonds even 
 for this purpose has practically disappeared. 
 
 Marine insurance was devised at an auspicious time for its 
 development. Nautical knowledge was rapidly broadening, men 
 were seeking new routes to known lands and trying to discover 
 new continents. Within three hundred years much new geo- 
 graphical knowledge was acquired, the mariner's compass was in- 
 vented, America was discovered and a new age had dawned. 
 During this period commercial activity had greatly broadened and 
 both the Continent and England were pregnant with new com- 
 mercial life. 
 
 Regular overseas communication was carried on between the 
 Mediterranean and the Baltic, and the Hansa merchants had 
 made a commercial invasion of England and controlled its foreign 
 trade from their headquarters in the Steelyard on the banks of the 
 Thames. There is evidence that they introduced marine insur- 
 ance into England, but to the Lombards who later gained the 
 commercial supremacy in England must be given the credit for 
 developing the new form of insurance. Not only were they in 
 their day, the fifteenth century, the merchant princes of England, 
 but they were the bankers for the Crown. The indelible impress 
 made on English insurance by these Italian merchants is nowhere 
 better evidenced than in the reference to them in the clause in the 
 present Lloyd's form of policy reading, viz.: 
 
 "And it is agreed by us, the insurers, that this writing or 
 policy of assurance shall be of as much force and effect as the 
 surest writing or policy of assurance heretofore made in Lom- 
 bard Street, or in the Royal Exchange, or elsewhere in 
 London." 
 
10 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 Method of Early Underwriting 
 
 Both on the Continent and in England the underwriting of 
 marine risks was done on the individual plan. The application 
 for insurance was carried from house to house and presented in 
 turn for the consideration of those who were in the habit of in- 
 suring marine risks. If favorably disposed, the individual would 
 sign his name to the application, with the amount which he was 
 willing to pay in the event of total loss. From this system of 
 placing the risks the word "underwrite" was derived and the 
 individuals who signed came to be known as "underwriters." 
 To facilitate the getting of names, merchants and shipowners 
 employed insurance brokers, who carried the application from 
 house to house until the full amount desired was underwritten. 
 Some states had a measure of insurance control and required that 
 insurance policies be recorded as public documents. 
 
 With the banishment of both the Hansa and Lombard mer- 
 chants, native Englishmen became merchants and English over- 
 seas trade both to the East and to the new lands in the West grew 
 apace. New commodities were introduced into England, among 
 them coffee from the East and tobacco from the West. 
 
 Coffee Houses and Lloyd's 
 
 The introduction of coffee had a real bearing on the develop- 
 ment of marine insurance in England. As the taste of the Eng- 
 lish people for coffee was cultivated, coffee shops sprang up here 
 and there in London and elsewhere, which partook of the char- 
 acter of clubs, catering to certain groups of business men. In one 
 of these, conducted by Edward Lloyd, men interested in shipping 
 were wont to gather. Lloyd was a man apparently of some busi- 
 ness acumen and, in order to attract trade, gathered information 
 of interest to men engaged in maritime affairs, which he posted 
 in his coffee house. In 1696 he commenced the publication of 
 Lloyd's News in order that wider circulation might be given to 
 this maritime information. In one issue, along with his marine 
 gossip, he carried an article which caused offense to the Crown 
 and the publication was suppressed after a short life of six months. 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 11 
 
 The publication again appears thirty years later as "Lloyd's List" 
 and has been published continuously ever since. 
 
 The popularity of Edward Lloyd grew, and men interested in 
 all phases of overseas trade gathered at his coffee shop to exchange 
 views on commercial problems. As insurance brokers could 
 always find many of the underwriters at Lloyd's, considerable 
 underwriting was done there. 
 
 Formation of Lloyd's 
 
 It was not until 1769, however, that the underwriters who 
 gathered at this Coffee House formed a definite organization 
 under the name "Lloyd's," and moved to the Royal Exchange. 
 The Coffee House idea moved with them, this particular function 
 of Lloyd's being vested in a head-waiter and his two associates 
 who cared for the physical needs of the members. It is interest- 
 ing to note that today, for the first time in its history, Lloyd's is 
 building its own home, having obtained a satisfactory site but a 
 stone's throw from the Royal Exchange.* 
 
 It is a quaint item of marine insurance history that in New 
 York during the last century it was customary in the marine in- 
 surance company offices to have a sideboard whereon were placed 
 crackers and cheese and other viands, some of a liquid nature, for 
 the physical refreshment of those who entered to transact business. 
 
 Corporate Underwriting 
 
 Some fifty years before the organization of Lloyd's, corporate 
 underwriting had its inception in England. Not without great 
 difficulty was this method of insuring introduced, for the whole 
 power of the individual underwriters was massed to prevent the 
 passage of the bill chartering the proposed companies. These 
 individuals would have been successful, had not the company advo- 
 cates offered a bribe in the form of a £600,000 contribution for 
 the support of the civil list of the Crown. This handsome pro- 
 posal appealed strongly to the King, who sent a special message 
 to Parliament successfully urging the passage of the bill granting 
 charters and a monopoly of corporate marine insurance under- 
 
 • The new Lloyd's building was declared open by King George V on 
 March 24, 1928. 
 
12 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 writing to the London Assurance Corporation and the Royal 
 Exchange Assurance Corporation. The proposal of the contri- 
 bution to the funds of the civil list proved little more than a 
 gesture, as the payments were not forthcoming and the sum due 
 was later reduced to £150,000, which was finally paid. 
 
 This monopoly, contrary to the fears of the individual under- 
 writers, proved a blessing to them. The English merchant and 
 ship-owner, accustomed to the security of individuals whose in- 
 tegrity was known, were loath to turn to the untried companies, 
 with the result that the companies' business grew slowly and the 
 individual underwriters were secured in their control of the 
 business. 
 
 A hundred years later, when an attempt was made to revoke 
 the monopoly, its most earnest supporters were found in Lloyd's, 
 then a strong and powerful organization. The first efforts to 
 overthrow the monopoly were made late in the eighteenth cen- 
 tury. The grant of monopoly contained a saving clause provid- 
 ing for its termination if it were found to be at any time hurtful 
 or inconvenient to the public. Relying on this clause, the Globe 
 Insurance Company in 1798 endeavored to enter the marine field 
 and petitioned Parliament for a repeal of the monopoly. Op- 
 posed by the power of Lloyd's, the petition died in committee. 
 Again in 1806 and 1807 similar efforts were made by the Globe 
 Company without result. 
 
 Repeal of Monopoly 
 
 In 1809 a powerful group of men petitioned for the repeal of 
 the monopoly and this time the question was thoroughly discussed 
 before Parliament, but again the petition was refused. The 
 accounts of the debates in Parliament on this petition are exceed- 
 ingly interesting, as much information in regard to the state of 
 marine insurance is given, together with interesting sketches of the 
 leaders in the marine insurance field. (See Frederick Martin's 
 History of Marine Insurance.) These discussions revealed weak- 
 nesses in the control of Lloyd's and a reorganization was effected. 
 This greatly strengthened the local association and broadened the 
 operations of its foreign agents. 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 13 
 
 Sometimes events of apparently slight importance lead to 
 momentous changes. So it happened that the overthrow of the 
 marine insurance monopoly in England was directly traceable to 
 the refusal of the directors of a large insurance company to ap- 
 point as its actuary Benjamin Gompertz, a brother-in-law of 
 Nathan Rothschild, the banker. Infuriated at this slight to his 
 kin, Nathan Rothschild vowed to form an insurance company and 
 give to Benjamin Gompertz a more important position than that 
 which he had sought. Immediately gathering together some of 
 his influential friends, he organized the Alliance British and 
 Foreign Fire and Life Assurance Company with a capital of 
 £5,000,000. Under the magic of the Rothschild name this huge 
 sum was quickly subscribed. 
 
 The directors then petitioned Parliament for the repeal of the 
 monopoly that this Company might engage in marine insurance. 
 Under the powerful influence of Rothschild, this effort succeeded 
 and the monopoly was repealed on June 24, 1824. Lloyd's, how- 
 ever, had not shot their last bolt. A member of Lloyd's, a sub- 
 scriber to the new company, sought an injunction prohibiting the 
 directors from engaging in marine insurance because the pros- 
 pectus inviting stock subscriptions had not proposed this form of 
 underwriting. The Court granted the injunction. Nothing 
 daunted, Nathan Rothschild quickly organized the Alliance 
 Marine Insurance Company, appointing Benjamin Gompertz as 
 its active manager. The way being opened, many companies were 
 organized to write marine insurance; a few successful ones sur- 
 vived, the majority soon passing into oblivion. 
 
 The Policy 
 
 The form of policy changed but little during the gradual 
 progress of marine insurance in England. Such a quaint docu- 
 ment with its obsolete wording could not fail to be the cause of 
 many disputes. Coincident with the growth of the business, there 
 evolved a series of court decisions defining the principles of marine 
 insurance and interpreting the meaning of the policy. 
 
 To Lord Mansfield, who in 1756 ascended the bench as Lord 
 Chief Justice of England, belongs much of the credit for the 
 
14 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 sensible interpretation given to the marine policy. He developed 
 a body of law founded on English and Continental precedents 
 applied in the light of commercial customs and usages, which to 
 this day is the basis of both English and American practice. In- 
 terpreted by the Courts, the policy with its quaint wording and, 
 to the lay mind, its ambiguous phrases, has become a well-under- 
 stood commercial document. 
 
 The continental countries were wont to codify their laws and 
 many efforts were made to codify the marine insurance law of 
 Great Britain. These efforts were unavailing until 1906 when 
 the Marine Insurance Act was passed by Parliament, followed in 
 1909 by the Marine Insurance (Gambling policies) Act. These 
 two Acts embody in codified form the marine insurance law of 
 Great Britain and are well worthy of study as a concise sum- 
 mary of marine insurance principles. Several valuable works on 
 these Acts have been published. 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 15 
 
 CHAPTER II 
 
 In the American Colonies 
 
 When the history of the United States is studied, the domi- 
 nant position held by European countries over the destinies of the 
 early colonists is apparent. Commerce with the colonies was 
 closely controlled. Therefore, it is not surprising that, prior to 
 the formation of the United States, little evidence appears of 
 marine insurance underwriting in the colonies. Such underwrit- 
 ing as was done was conducted on the individual plan and here 
 and there in the larger seaboard cities offices were opened for the 
 underwriting of marine risks. The first of these commenced 
 operations in Philadelphia in 1721 under the guidance of one 
 John C. Copson. Communication with England being slow and 
 uncertain at this time, Copson pointed out the advantage of being 
 able to insure ships and cargoes locally and of knowing at once 
 that the property was insured, rather than waiting in uncertainty 
 until mail advices were received. What success attended this Snd 
 other similar ventures is not known. Record appears of insur- 
 ance offices being opened in New York City in 1759 and again in 
 1778. The lack of historical information would indicate that 
 there was little demand for Marine insurance in the American 
 colonies. 
 
 In the United States 
 
 With the close of the Revolutionary War an independent 
 American commerce arose and, as a natural sequence, the need was 
 felt for an American Marine Insurance facility. Accordingly in 
 1792 there was organized in Philadelphia, then the commercial 
 metropolis of the United States, the Insurance Company of North 
 America to which was granted a formal charter in 1794. The 
 corporate system of underwriting evidently appealed to the Ameri- 
 
16 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 can merchant and shipowner, for many companies were soon 
 established in other seaboard cities of the United States. The 
 history of these companies is one of periods of intermittent pros- 
 perity and adversity. War always creates a demand for marine 
 insurance protection, while the succeeding period of peace is one 
 of readjustment which only the strongest companies survive. 
 Scores of companies have been organized in the United States but 
 few have survived for a very long period. 
 
 The commercial growth of the United States was phenomenal 
 and its oversea trade grew so rapidly, especially after the develop- 
 ment of the Clipper Ships, that marine insurance had a remark- 
 able growth. Many companies were organized on the mutual 
 plan, but, as they were managed by inexperienced underwriters, 
 their careers were short and but few survived to the latter part of 
 the nineteenth century. Today only one of these, The Atlantic 
 Mutual Insurance Company, is operating, but this is the largest 
 and strongest company in the world doing exclusively marine, 
 yacht, inland and transportation underwriting. 
 
 Development in the United States 
 
 The progress of marine insurance in the United States has 
 always been an uphill fight. Unlike other forms of insurance, it 
 is international in its character and consequently marine com- 
 panies are in active competition with the underwriters of the 
 world. Competing with the old and strongly financed companies 
 of Great Britain, the American companies had and still have a 
 difficult struggle. The foreign company does a world-wide busi- 
 ness while the American company is to a considerable degree 
 confined in its underwriting to risks to and from the United 
 States. In order to force American companies out of this business, 
 foreign underwriters will often write American business at un- 
 profitable rates in an effort to control it. Furthermore, most of 
 the larger British companies are entered in the American insur- 
 ance field and carry on locally an active competition for business. 
 
 Nevertheless, in spite of the obstacles there is a well-estab- 
 lished marine insurance facility in the United States today, fully 
 able to care for the needs of American merchants and shipowners, 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 17 
 
 but unnecessarily handicapped in combating foreign competition 
 by the unwise restrictions placed upon its activities by the various 
 States and unduly burdened by taxes high in comparison with 
 those assessed by the governments of foreign countries. 
 
 The World War gave a passing vision of the necessity for an 
 independent national marine insurance facility to safeguard the 
 nation's commerce, but, like many another war lesson, it was soon 
 forgotten. The emancipation of the American marine insurance 
 companies can be largely accomplished by the adoption, by each of 
 the several States, of the so-called Model Marine Insurance Law 
 of the District of Columbia.* This greatly enlarges the field of 
 marine insurance and taxes the companies on the basis of their 
 profits and not on the basis of their premium writings. This 
 method of taxation corresponds to that imposed on marine insur- 
 ance by other important maritime nations. 
 
 Marine Insurance and Commerce 
 
 It will be interesting to consider the part that marine insur- 
 ance plays in overseas commerce. As has already been pointed 
 out, the present method of insuring and the use of the bill of 
 exchange probably began at about the same time. The practice 
 of selling goods in foreign markets on a credit basis would not be 
 carried on, were it not for the security given by the marine insur- 
 ance policy. This document is always attached to the commercial 
 papers or is referred to in them, and is available to indemnify 
 against loss of or damage to the goods on which the credit trans- 
 action is founded. 
 
 When consideration is given to the tremendous volume of 
 goods which is constantly in transit from market to market to 
 supply the needs and the desires of mankind, some appreciation 
 may be had of the very vital place that marine insurance has in the 
 life of man. Were this system not available to furnish, in almost 
 limitless amounts, indemnity against marine and transportation 
 perils, only a small measure of the human comfort that man has 
 attained would be enjoyed. Credit transactions make possible the 
 
 * Since this was written, several of the States have adopted laws similar 
 to that of the District of Columbia. 
 
18 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 international interchange of commodities, the credits being given 
 on the security of real values as evidenced by the goods in transit. 
 The continued existence of these goods while the credit continues 
 is vital to the security of the lending bank, but as all goods are 
 perishable and subject to loss or damage, the lender places his real 
 reliance on the policy of insurance, knowing that by virtue of 
 this document his security will not be destroyed merely because 
 the collateral itself has been lost or damaged. 
 
 The Policy 
 
 The marine insurance policy which makes possible these inter- 
 national interchanges of commodities is a very wonderful docu- 
 ment. A real appreciation of the commercial progress attained at 
 the beginning of the 17th century may be had by considering that 
 the policy then in use is little different from the basic form of 
 policy current today. That a document so fully meeting the needs 
 of commerce was conceived by the insurance men of that early 
 date, is no small tribute to their ability. 
 
 The Perils 
 
 The "perils" clause in one of the earliest authentic policies 
 extant, that on the Ship "Tiger" dated in 1613, differs little from 
 the wording of the modern policy. In this part of the policy 
 marine underwriters, more than three hundred years ago, fashioned 
 a form of protection for ocean voyages that indicates a remarkable 
 appreciation of the needs of merchants. Here in a single document 
 insurance is provided against the many different hazards to which 
 property at sea is exposed, namely, fire, of the sea, war, pirates, 
 rovers, thieves, barratry, etc., as set forth in the "perils" clause 
 in use at the present time, reading as follows : 
 
 "Touching the adventures and perils which the said Insur- 
 ance Company is contended to bear, and takes upon itself in 
 this voyage, they are of the seas, men-of-war, fires, enemies, 
 pirates, rovers, assailing thieves, jettisons, letters of mart and 
 countermart, reprisals, takings at sea, arrests, restraints and 
 detainments of all kings, princes or people of what nation, con- 
 dition, or quality soever, barratry of the master and mariners, 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 19 
 
 and all other perils, losses and misfortunes, that have or shall 
 come to the hurt, detriment or damage of the said goods and 
 merchandises or any part thereof." 
 
 It is somewhat remarkable that, when at a later date insur- 
 ance was devised to protect fixed property on land, a similar plan 
 was not adopted of providing in a single policy protection against 
 the various perils to which the property of a houseowner or a 
 householder is exposed. It is only within very recent years that 
 there has been any attempt to incorporate in one contract insur- 
 ance against the various perils, such as fire, tornado, burglary, 
 water damage, etc., to which fixed property on land is subjected. 
 
 Broadening of the Cover 
 
 Marine insurance, originally designed to protect property at 
 risk at sea, has been greatly broadened to cover the transportation 
 of property not only by water but by land and, in more recent 
 times, by air. The policy, as originally developed, described only 
 perils encountered at sea. It has been necessary to add new 
 clauses to policies enumerating the perils insured prior and subse- 
 quent to property being waterborne. One of these forms reads: 
 
 "Goods while on land conveyances are covered against loss 
 or damage caused by fire, collision, derailment, or by any 
 other accident to the conveyance; while on docks or elsewhere 
 on shore, against the risks of cyclones, hurricanes and collapse 
 and/or subsidence of docks, wharves, piers or quays and also 
 against fire and floods (meaning rising of navigable waters) 
 whether this insurance be F. P. A. or otherwise." 
 
 It will be observed that the perils enumerated are of the same 
 general nature as those embraced in the "perils" clause of the 
 marine policy. 
 
 It is quite apparent that the trend of insurance practice is 
 toward multiple line insurance. Nowhere is this more evident 
 than in the marine insurance field. More and more the merchant 
 is seeking protection against losses which were and still are lia- 
 bilities of the shipowner. Collecting claims from shipowners is 
 ordinarily a slow process. For this reason the merchant is en- 
 
20 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 deavoring to make the underwriter a collection agency, by buying 
 protection against such losses and assigning his claim against the 
 carrier to the underwriter. 
 
 Insurable Interest 
 
 As in other forms of insurance, an insurable interest must 
 exist to enable a person to enter into a marine insurance contract. 
 Such an interest may be described as one wherein the relation of 
 the applicant to the goods, in connection with which insurance is 
 desired, is such that he will be benefited by their continued exist- 
 ence, or be prejudiced by their loss or damage. Such interest may 
 be remote, as that of an agent who may earn a small commission 
 upon the delivery of the goods at destination in a merchantable 
 condition. On the other hand the interest may be very direct, as 
 that of an owner who is transferring his property from one 
 market to another. In between these two extremes numerous 
 shades of ownership or relationship exist, which give rise to a 
 valid insurable interest. It must be observed that the insurance 
 policy insures the assured and not the thing, but an insurable 
 interest must exist in the person with relation to the thing in 
 order that a contract of insurance be valid. 
 
 When Policy Attaches 
 
 A marine insurance policy covering merchandise, when un- 
 amended by modifying clauses, attaches from and immediately 
 following the loading of the cargo on board the vessel at the port 
 of loading, and continues to cover until the cargo is safely landed 
 at the port of destination. If the vessel loads at a port where 
 cargo is customarily loaded at the wharf, the risk will attach 
 when the slings of the vessel lift the cargo clear of the wharf, or, 
 if loaded with wharf cranes, when the wharf-crane releases the 
 cargo on the ship. 
 
 If the port of loading is one where the vessel lies at anchor 
 and loads from shore craft, the risk will attach only when the 
 cargo is actually laden on the ocean vessel, unless special pro- 
 vision is made to include the craft risk. This is usually done by 
 including in the policy the following clause, viz. : 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 21 
 
 "Including transit by craft, raft and/or lighter to and 
 from the vessel. Each craft, raft, and/or lighter to be deemed 
 a separate insurance. The assured are not to be prejudiced 
 by any agreement exempting lighter-men from liability." 
 
 At destination, however, the insurance continues by the policy 
 terms until the goods are safely landed, so that the craft risk from 
 the ocean vessel at a port where it is customary to discharge into 
 lighters is covered. 
 
 Warehouse to Warehouse 
 
 It has been necessary, because of the extension of marine insur- 
 ance policies to cover property in transit on land, to redescribe the 
 points of attachment and of termination of the risk. This has 
 been accomplished by the use of the "warehouse to warehouse" 
 clause, which provides for the insurance of the property while in 
 ordinary course of transit from the moment it leaves the shippers' 
 premises until it is delivered at the warehouse of the consignee. 
 In its most recent form, that of the London Institute, dated Jan- 
 uary 1, 1933, the warehouse to warehouse clause reads: 
 
 "The risks covered by this policy attach from the time the 
 goods leave the Warehouse and/or Store at the place named in 
 the policy for the commencement of the transit and continue 
 during the ordinary course of transit, including customary 
 transhipment if any, until the goods are discharged overside 
 from the overseas vessel at the final port. Thereafter the risks 
 covered are continued whilst the goods are in transit and/or 
 awaiting transit until delivered to final warehouse at the des- 
 tination named in the policy or until the expiry of 15 days 
 (or 30 days if the destination to which the goods are insured 
 is outside the limits of the port) whichever shall first occur. 
 The time limits referred to above to be reckoned from mid- 
 night of the day on which the discharge overside of the goods 
 hereby insured from the overseas vessels is completed. Tran- 
 shipment, if any, other than as above, and/or delay in excess of 
 the above time limits arising from circumstances beyond the 
 control of the assured, held covered at a premium to be ar- 
 ranged. 
 
22 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 "Note: It is necessary for the Assured to give prompt notice 
 to Underwriters when he becomes aware of an event for which 
 he is "held covered" under this policy and the right to such 
 cover is dependent on compliance with this obligation." 
 
 The marine policy purposes to protect the assured, with respect 
 to the property named in the policy, while such property is out of 
 the custody and control of the assured and while it is in transit. 
 It is realized that in the handling of merchandise over long voy- 
 ages there is inevitably some loss or depreciation in the property. 
 While the policy is broad in the number of perils against which it 
 insures, the losses against which indemnity is provided are only 
 those happening fortuitously from the perils named. 
 
fell 
 
 S 1*2 §| 
 
 H Hi* 
 
 1 
 
 C • 5 .a * 
 
 S? i* 
 
 1 1 * 
 
 2M £S M'- o 
 bo o o 5 
 
 ■sfj sis" J s 
 
 s ** ~ s u 
 § I .a 
 
 3 o 5 u 'E -o 
 
 6-1 
 
 o 
 
 u 
 
26 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 CHAPTER HI 
 
 Average 
 
 As the word "average" occurs so frequently in any discussion 
 of marine insurance, it will be profitable to pause at this point and 
 consider its meaning. Its use in marine insurance is a technical 
 one; it means loss or damage less than a total loss and is of two 
 kinds. General average, to which reference has already been 
 made, is a partial loss or an expense falling generally on all the 
 interests involved in a maritime adventure. It is the result of a 
 sacrifice voluntarily made, under fortuitous circumstances, of a 
 portion of either ship or cargo, or the voluntary incurrence of 
 expense for the sole purpose of preserving the common interest 
 from an impending danger. 
 
 Particular average is a partial loss, suffered by a particular 
 interest, which is not a general average loss. The last phrase is 
 added because in a general average sacrifice it often happens that 
 a particular interest is damaged, say by water in extinguishing a 
 fire. The resulting loss, while a partial loss of a particular inter- 
 est, is contributed to ratably by all the affected interests and is 
 therefore considered a general average. 
 
 It has been noted that in the handling of goods some resultant 
 damage ensues. A reasonable amount of such damage is antici- 
 pated and becomes an expected commercial loss. Such loss, of 
 course, is not covered by a marine insurance policy. Further- 
 more it is not unusual for some slight fortuitous loss, caused by a 
 peril insured against in the policy, to overtake the property while 
 in transit. To avoid liability for losses of the latter type, "aver- 
 age clauses," as they are known, have been introduced into marine 
 policies and this custom opens up one of the most interesting 
 phases of marine insurance practice. 
 
 The underwriter endeavors in these average clauses so to 
 furnish indemnity that these small fortuitous losses will remain 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 27 
 
 at the risk of the merchant, while all other losses resulting from 
 insured perils will be at the underwriter's risk. To acquire the 
 necessary knowledge to be able to do this is no little part of the 
 marine underwriter's training. 
 
 The Franchise 
 
 The primary purpose then of the average clause is to bar out 
 of the policy expected fortuitous losses. This is done by the 
 franchise in the average clause. The franchise may be expressed 
 as a percentage or as a named sum which must be reached before 
 liability attaches under the policy. For example, in the clause in 
 common use reading, "Free of particular average unless amount- 
 ing to five per cent (5%)," 5% is the franchise. Expressed in 
 other words, the clause states that no partial loss (caused, of 
 course, by an insured peril) will be paid unless it equals or ex- 
 ceeds 5% of the insured value. If it equals or exceeds 5%, the 
 underwriter pays the entire loss. 
 
 In another form of average clause known as the "deductible 
 franchise form," only such part of the loss as exceeds the fran- 
 chise is paid. The clause cited above in the deductible form 
 would read, "Free of particular average, unless amounting to five 
 per cent (5%), which is deductible." 
 
 In the absence of modifying words the franchise in the average 
 clause will be applied to the value of the entire shipment. Since 
 * in modern commercial transactions the value involved in a single 
 shipment may be quite large, it is customary to apply the franchise 
 to a lesser unit than the shipment. Depending on the suscepti- 
 bility of the goods to damage, the unit may be made each ship- 
 ping package, each 25 bags, each lot of each mark, or a dollar unit 
 may be used as "each amount of $5,000." With such a control- 
 ling phrase added to the average clause, the amount necessary to 
 make a claim is materially reduced, the liability of the under- 
 writer is greatly increased and the rate of premium should be 
 correspondingly raised. 
 
 Memorandum 
 
 It would be an ideal situation if it were possible so to arrange 
 average conditions that a single rate would measure the under- 
 
28 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 writer's risk on all the different kinds of cargo in a single ad- 
 venture. It may have been with such an ideal in mind that the 
 so-called memorandum clause was devised in 1748. In the 
 Lloyd's form of policy the memorandum clause is comparatively 
 short and lists but a few items. In this country the tendency has 
 been to broaden the memorandum clause and some of the Ameri- 
 can clauses contain a formidable list of commodities with fran- 
 chises as high as 20%', these percentages indicating in a rough 
 way the relative susceptibility to damage of the enumerated items. 
 A memorandum clause in common use reads, viz. : 
 
 "Memorandum. It is also agreed, that bar, bundle, rod, 
 hoop and sheet iron, wire of all kinds, tin plates, steel, madder, 
 sumac, wicker-ware, and willow, (manufactured or other- 
 wise), salt, grain of all kinds, tobacco, indian meal, fruits, 
 (whether preserved or otherwise), cheese, dry fish, hay, vege- 
 tables and roots, rags, hempen yarn, bags, cotton bagging and 
 other articles used for bags or bagging, pleasure carriages, 
 household furniture, skins and hides, musical instruments, 
 looking-glasses, and all other articles that are perishable in 
 their own nature, are warranted by the assured free from 
 average, unless general; hemp, tobacco stems, matting and 
 cassia, except in boxes, free from average under twenty per 
 cent unless general; and sugar, flax, flax-seed and bread, are 
 warranted by the assured free from average under seven per 
 cent unless general ; and coffee in bags or bulk, pepper in bags 
 or bulk, and rice, free from average under ten per cent unless 
 general. 
 
 "Warranted by the insured free from damage or injury, 
 from dampness, change of flavor, or being spotted, discolored, 
 musty or mouldy, except caused by actual contact of sea water 
 with the articles damaged, occasioned by sea perils. In case 
 of partial loss by sea damage to dry goods, cutlery or other 
 hardware, the loss shall be ascertained by a separation and 
 sale of the portion only of the contents of the packages so 
 damaged, and not otherwise; and the same practice shall ob- 
 tain as to all other merchandise as far as practicable. Not 
 liable for leakage on molasses or other liquids, unless occas- 
 sioned by stranding or collision with another vessel." 
 
 In the above clause reference is made to goods which are 
 insured free of average, unless general. In other words, such 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 29 
 
 goods are deemed to be so easily damaged that they are not in- 
 sured against partial losses except those of a general average 
 nature. 
 
 F. P. A. Policies 
 
 Midway between the policy affording no protection against 
 partial loss and one granting indemnity against partial losses if 
 amounting to a given percentage, is the policy where liability for 
 partial loss is dependent upon the occurrence of a major casualty, 
 namely, stranding, sinking, fire or collision. Such policies in 
 marine insurance circles are known as F. P. A. (free of particular 
 average) policies, as distinguished from W. P. A. (with particu- 
 lar average) policies. The F. P. A. feature is embodied in a 
 clause called the "free of particular average clause." Two forms 
 of this clause are in use, one originating in England, the other 
 in the United States. The former is known as the F. P. A. E. C. 
 (English conditions), the latter, the F. P. A. A. C. (American 
 conditions) clause. 
 
 The F. P. A. E. C. clause in its simplest form reads, "Free 
 of particular average unless the vessel or craft be stranded, sunk, 
 burnt on fire or in collison," while the F. P. A. A. C. clause is 
 worded, "Free of particular average unless caused by stranding, 
 sinking, burning or collision with another vessel." 
 
 Doubtless the underwriters on both sides of the Atlantic in 
 formulating these clauses were endeavoring to achieve the same 
 result, namely, to avoid liability for fortuituous partial losses, un- 
 less such were directly the result of the named casualty. In draw- 
 ing clauses, underwriters often give too little consideration to the 
 meaning of words and when the Courts have handed down their 
 judgment interpreting the meaning, the author of the clause is 
 astonished at his creation. So it was that when the English F. 
 P. A. clause was first tested in Court an unexpected interpreta- 
 tion resulted. The Court held that under the English form, if 
 one of the named casualties had happened on the insured voyage 
 and thus "opened up the warranty," as it is termed, any loss 
 would be recoverable which would have been payable had the 
 policy not contained the F. P. A. E. C. clause. To state the case 
 
30 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 concretely, under the English form if a vessel sailed with the 
 insured cargo on board and stranded while leaving port, but was 
 later released without damage to the cargo, any subsequent dam- 
 age to cargo, caused by heavy weather or other insured peril, 
 would be claimable under the policy. 
 
 That such a clause is open to abuse will be readily seen. In- 
 surance procured on F. P. A. E. C. terms is naturally less costly 
 than that admitting claims for partial loss due to any insured 
 peril. It is therefore possible for a full cargo owner to obtain 
 insurance at a relatively low rate on F. P. A. E. C. terms and, by 
 collusion with the master, have the vessel put lightly ashore in a 
 comparatively safe place on an ebb tide and floated again on the 
 flood tide. This temporary stranding effected early in the voyage 
 would abrogate the F. P. A. warranty and for the remainder of 
 the voyage the cargo would be insured subject to average. Again, 
 a cargo-owner learning that heavy weather had been encountered 
 on the voyage with resultant damage to cargo by seawater might 
 arrange with the master, at a port of call, to strand the vessel for 
 a short time while entering the port of destination. This would 
 "open up" the F. P. A. warranty and so admit claim for the sea- 
 water damage under the policy. The American version of the 
 clause prevents this possible abuse and bars claims for partial loss 
 unless the damage claimed is directly caused by the casualty. 
 That the American theory is more logical will readily be ad- 
 mitted, but as a matter of practice the English form is more often 
 used. The English clause in general use, the F. P. A. Institute 
 clause, as it is known, adopts the American principle with respect 
 to collision losses and fire losses not involving the vessel itself. 
 It also greatly broadens the protection granted by the under- 
 writer under F. P. A. terms. This clause reads: 
 
 "Warranted free from Particular Average unless the ves- 
 sel or craft be stranded, sunk, or burnt, but notwithstanding 
 this warranty the Underwriters are to pay the insured value of 
 any package or packages which may be totally lost in loading, 
 transhipment or discharge, also for any loss of or damage to 
 the interests insured which may reasonably be attributed to 
 fire, collision or contact of the vessel and/or craft and/or 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 31 
 
 conveyance with any external substance (ice included) other 
 than water, or to discharge of cargo at a port of distress, also 
 to pay landing, warehousing, forwarding and special charges 
 if incurred for which Underwriters would be liable under a 
 policy covering Particular Average. This clause shall operate 
 during the whole period covered by the policy." 
 
 Two Insurers 
 
 Since there are always two parties, and sometimes many more, 
 interested in a maritime venture, it frequently happens that the 
 same goods are insured by more than one person. Some rule to 
 control such cases is necessary and in American policies the rule is 
 set forth that the prior insurance, so far as it is sufficient in 
 amount, is the valid insurance. Insurances of the same date con- 
 tribute pro rata. This rule marks one of the important differences 
 between American and English practice, the latter permitting any 
 insurance, regardless of date, to be availed of, the paying under- 
 writer proceeding against other underwriters on the same prop- 
 erty as if they were sureties and collecting from each his pro 
 rata share. Double insurance, as such insurance is known, must 
 be carefully distinguished from two insurances on the same prop- 
 erty covering different risks, as for example, one policy covering 
 marine perils and another covering war perils, or one covering the 
 total loss hazard only, while another covers only particular aver- 
 age claims. 
 
32 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 CHAPTER IV 
 
 Sue and Labor Clause 
 
 There is another section of the marine insurance policy, called 
 the "Sue and Labor Clause," which is peculiar to marine insur- 
 ance contracts. This clause reads as follows, viz.: 
 
 "In case of any loss or misfortune, it shall be lawful and 
 
 necessary to and for the assured factors, servants, and 
 
 assigns, to sue, labor and travel for, in and about the defense, 
 safeguard and recovery of the said goods and merchandises, or 
 any part thereof, without prejudice to this insurance; nor shall 
 the acts of the insured or insurers, in recovering, saving and 
 preserving the property insured, in case of disaster, be con- 
 sidered a waiver or an acceptance of an abandonment; to the 
 charges whereof, the said Insurance Co. will contribute ac- 
 cording to the rate and quantity of the sum herein insured. . ." 
 
 This part of the marine insurance policy is very old in principle, 
 a clause of similar import appearing in the "Tiger" policy previ- 
 ously referred to. The latter part, the waiver clause, is of more 
 recent origin. 
 
 Until the comparatively recent development of the telegraph, 
 cable and wireless, a maritime adventure was out of touch with 
 the owners and the underwriters for the larger part of the voyage. 
 Disaster, whether of great or small extent, requires prompt ac- 
 tion on the part of those on the scene in order that the adventure 
 may be saved, or that damage already sustained may not become 
 progressively worse. It is therefore provided in this clause that 
 in such case it is not only the right but indeed the duty of the 
 assured or his agents to take all necessary steps for the protection 
 of the property, whether hull or cargo. Such action will not 
 prejudice in any way the rights of the assured under the policy, 
 and the underwriter will consider expenses so incurred, known as 
 special charges in that they relate to a specific interest, as part of 
 the claim under the policy. 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 33 
 
 While at the present time the underwriter is usually in direct 
 touch with property in peril, this clause is very useful in com- 
 pelling the assured to take all necessary steps to preserve his rights 
 against third parties (carriers for example) and thus safeguard 
 the interests of the underwriter who, on payment of the claim, 
 is subrogated to the rights of the assured. 
 
 Warranties 
 
 Warranties play an important part in marine insurance prac- 
 tice. A warranty is of such an important nature that its breach, 
 unless excused or excusable, voids the policy from the date of the 
 breach. Warranties are of two kinds, implied and expressed, the 
 breach of either being equally fatal to the insurance contract. 
 The implied warranties are those read into the contract by law; 
 the expressed warranties are written into the policy by the inten- 
 tion of the parties. The implied warranties are few in number ; 
 the expressed warranties are without number and may relate to 
 any matter whether it be vital to the contract or not. Whether 
 seemingly important or not, an expressed warranty must be com- 
 plied with strictly and literally. 
 
 Implied Warranties — Seaworthiness 
 
 The implied warranties are the result of law court decisions 
 of preceding centuries with respect to marine insurance policies. 
 These decisions are in many cases merely the embodiment, in legal 
 form, of the customs and usages of merchants. The implied 
 warranties are just as binding on the assured as matters definitely 
 expressed in the body of the policy. If desired they may be 
 changed to expressed warranties and written into the contract. 
 
 Doubtless the most important of the implied warranties and 
 the one most often referred to is the implied warranty of sea- 
 worthiness. This warranty is implied in all policies, except those 
 insuring vessel hulls for a period of time. Such policies fre- 
 quently attach while a vessel is at sea, so that the condition of the 
 vessel may not be known to the assured. However, it is required 
 that when a vessel, in an unseaworthy condition, arrives at any 
 port where repairs can be made or equipment or supplies obtained, 
 
34 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 the assured must there use due diligence to make the vessel sea- 
 worthy. Whether or not a vessel is seaworthy is a question of 
 fact to be determined only after taking expert testimony. In 
 order that this implied warranty may be complied with, it is 
 necessary that the vessel at the commencement of the voyage, or 
 of any separate part of the voyage if divisible, be suitably con- 
 structed and equipped, properly officered and manned and suf- 
 ficiently fueled and provisioned, for the carrying of the specified 
 cargo insured on the particular voyage described. This definition 
 will clearly indicate that there is no fixed standard of seaworthi- 
 ness. A vessel may require different degrees of seaworthiness for 
 different portions of her voyage. A vessel fit to load in a safe 
 harbor and navigate a sheltered bay or river to the open sea 
 might be quite unfit to endure the rigors of a transatlantic voy- 
 age. A vessel fit to carry a light non-perishable cargo such as 
 lumber might be unsafe with a heavy perishable cargo -such as 
 nitrate. 
 
 Often the best proof of unseaworthiness is the fact that with- 
 out apparent cause a vessel founders. Two possible explanations 
 immediately arise, either that the vessel was unseaworthy or that 
 she was intentionally destroyed. With so many factors entering 
 into the question of seaworthiness, it will be seen that only ex- 
 perts offering evidence under all the court rules controlling the 
 giving of testimony can determine the question. Usually the 
 loss of a vessel is attributable to disturbed conditions at sea, so 
 that to prove that the loss resulted from her unfit condition and 
 not because of the perils of the sea is a matter of no little 
 difficulty. 
 
 The adaptation of the marine insurance policy to the needs of 
 modern commerce is perhaps no better evidenced than in the fact 
 that practically all cargo policies written today contain a clause 
 of the following import, i. e., 
 
 "Seaworthiness of the vessel as between assurers and as- 
 sured is hereby admitted." 
 
 When a merchant charters a whole vessel he is presumably in 
 a position to satisfy himself that the vessel is fit for the con- 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 35 
 
 templated voyage. Today it is rather the exception to have full 
 cargo charters. As a rule, cargo space is engaged from a steam- 
 ship line without knowing, until the bill of lading is issued, the 
 name of the carrying vessel. The shipper therefore has no op- 
 portunity to investigate the condition or fitness of the ship. 
 Hence the waiver of the implied warranty by the underwriter so 
 far as the assured is concerned. This does not affect the assured's 
 right of action for unseaworthiness against the carrier under the 
 bill of lading, to which right the underwriter is subrogated on 
 payment of loss. 
 
 Commencement of Risk 
 
 There is an implied warranty that the risk shall commence 
 within ,a reasonable time. That this unwritten clause in the 
 contract of marine insurance is fair, will be appreciated when it 
 is remembered that the hazards of a voyage vary from time to 
 time. A risk placed today on the assumption of prompt sailing 
 may present relatively moderate hazards, while the same risk, if 
 by a vessel sailing a month later, may be fraught with great dan- 
 ger. Thus an insurance by a vessel from a port which, during a 
 portion of the year, is icebound, might present a moderately 
 hazardous risk if sailing in the late fall. If the vessel sailed one 
 month later when ice and snow had become a serious menace, the 
 underwriter would be faced with an exceedingly dangerous risk 
 which he might not have considered at all if it had been pre- 
 sented to him at the later date. Therefore, unless the sailing date 
 is specifically agreed, it is implied that the voyage will commence 
 with reasonable dispatch. If there is unreasonable delay, the 
 underwriter need not go on with the risk, or if he is not informed 
 of the delay in commencing the voyage until after loss has hap- 
 pened, he may be relieved of liability. 
 
 Deviation 
 
 Analagous to the implied warranty of reasonable dispatch is 
 the implied warranty of "no deviation." The doctrine of "no 
 deviation" requires that after the inception of the policy the as- 
 sured cannot substitute a different voyage, no matter how slight 
 
36 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 the difference may be or whether or not the substituted risk 
 involves a greater or less hazard than did the insured voyage, save 
 only in the case of excusable deviation. This doctrine is merely 
 the statement in specific form of the general legal principle that a 
 formal contract cannot be varied without the mutual consent of 
 the parties to the contract. 
 
 In certain cases deviation is excusable. In the policy form 
 the following words appear in the description of the voyage: 
 
 ". . . and it shall and may be lawful for the said vessel, in 
 her voyage, to proceed and sail to, touch and stay at, any ports 
 or places, if thereunto obliged by stress of weather or other 
 unavoidable accident, without prejudice to this insurance." 
 
 In addition to these excusable deviations, deviation is excused, — ■ 
 
 1. When caused by circumstances over which the master 
 or owner has no control, or 
 
 2. To save human life or to aid a vessel where human 
 life may be in danger. 
 
 3. To obtain medical or surgical aid for persons on board 
 ship. 
 
 However, in all cases of excusable deviations the vessel must 
 resume her intended voyage with all possible dispatch. Devia- 
 tion does not void the contract ab initio, but it does void the 
 policy from the time and point of the deviation and relieves the 
 underwriter from any further liability. 
 
 The implied warranty of "no deviation" like that of sea- 
 worthiness, because of the exigencies of modern commercial 
 practice, has become of relatively little importance to the assured, 
 since there is incorporated in almost every policy whether on 
 cargo or hull a "deviation clause" holding the assured covered at 
 a rate to be arranged when the facts are known. A deviation 
 clause in general use reads: 
 
 "Held covered at a premium to be arranged in case of 
 deviation or change of voyage, or other variation of the risk 
 by reason of the exercise of any liberty granted to the ship- 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 37 
 
 owner or charterer under the contract of affreightment, or 
 of any omission or error in the description of the interest 
 vessel or voyage." 
 
 Legal Conduct 
 
 In marine insurance policies as in all other contracts there is 
 the implied warranty that the laws of the land will be observed. 
 This warranty of legal conduct, while it extends to the foreign 
 and domestic laws of the country where the contract is executed 
 and to international law and to treaties to which such country is 
 a party, does not prevent the assured and assurer bargaining with 
 respect to voyages contrary to the domestic laws of foreign coun- 
 tries. This will explain why legal foreign insurance might be 
 procured on a rum-running fleet violating our laws. It will be 
 evident that this implied warranty of legal conduct, unlike the 
 other implied warranties, cannot be waived by mutual agreement 
 of the parties to the contract. 
 
 Good Faith 
 
 The whole theory of marine insurance is predicated on the 
 understanding that there shall be the sincerest good faith between 
 the contracting parties. The insurance of cargo in almost every 
 case, and the insurance of hulls in the majority of cases, is under- 
 written without opportunity of a personal inspection of the cargo 
 or hull by the underwriter or his representative. It therefore is 
 essential that so far as is reasonably possible there shall be dis- 
 closed to the underwriter by the applicant or his agent all ma- 
 terial facts that would tend to influence the judgment of the 
 underwriter for or against the risk. Not only is it important 
 that this should be done, it is necessary that it be done in order 
 that a valid contract may result. For if there be concealed from 
 the underwriter any material fact, or if there be a misrepresenta- 
 tion of the risk offered so that the underwriter is induced to 
 underwrite a risk which he might have declined had the facts 
 been fully and truthfully presented to him, the underwriter will 
 not be held to his bargain, since the minds of the contracting 
 parties did not meet. It is not important that the misrepresenta- 
 
38 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 tion or the concealment was unintentional; it is enough to void 
 the contract with respect to consequences arising therefrom, that 
 facts material to a proper consideration of the risk were falsely 
 stated or not stated at all. If the misrepresentation or the con- 
 cealment was willful, the transaction would be tainted with 
 fraud and therefore be void in law from its inception. 
 
 Representations 
 
 The statement of a material fact, if tending to influence the 
 underwriter in his estimate of the character and degree of the 
 risk to be insured against, is called a representation. It is dis- 
 tinguished from a warranty in that a warranty must be literally 
 complied with and need not be material to the risk, whereas the 
 representation, although material to the consideration of the risk, 
 need only be complied with substantially. On the other hand, a 
 literal but not a substantial fulfillment of the representation is 
 not sufficient. It should be observed in this connection that there 
 is no requirement that facts which are matters of common knowl- 
 edge shall be disclosed. 
 
 The subject of representations, misrepresentations and con- 
 cealments, while one of the most important and fundamental 
 among the principles of marine insurance, can only be mentioned 
 and not fully discussed in this brief treatise. It seldom happens 
 that there is unintentional misrepresentation or concealment. In 
 most cases such action is the result of a deliberate intent to de- 
 ceive and thereby induce an underwriter to accept a risk which, 
 if he were fully informed, he would decline. 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 39 
 
 CHAPTER V 
 
 Valued Policies 
 
 The subject of valuation clauses presents perhaps the most 
 marked difference between marine and other forms of insurance. 
 Practically every marine insurance policy, whether it be on cargo, 
 hull or freight, is a valued policy ; that is, the value of the insured 
 subject matter is determined in the policy either definitely or by a 
 formula which, if applied to the shipping documents, will de- 
 termine the value. Thus a hull will be valued at a stated num- 
 ber of dollars, divided perhaps for convenience and for the 
 application of average clauses into one amount for the hull, 
 tackle, etc., and another amount for the machinery. Cargo 
 policies will be valued at the sum insured or at the invoice value, 
 plus a named percentage to cover shipping expenses and other 
 necessary outlays to place the property on the market at destina- 
 tion. Freight, the name given to the money paid for the trans- 
 portation of goods by water, is valued usually at the aggregate of 
 the freight moneys to be paid by the cargo shippers to the vessel 
 owner or charterer. 
 
 In one way or another practically every marine policy will by 
 agreement therein admit the value of the insured interest to be 
 that expressed in the policy. The principle of co-insurance is 
 fundamental in marine insurance practice, the underwriter as- 
 suming only such proportion of any loss as the amount of his 
 policy bears to the total valuation of the insured interest as deter- 
 mined thereby. In an unvalued policy, such as the common form 
 of fire policy, the underwriter pays the whole loss, not exceeding 
 the amount of his policy. 
 
 Thus under a marine policy for $5,000 on cargo valued at 
 $10,000 the underwriter would respond, up to an amount of 
 $5,000, for only 50% of any loss incurred. In the case of a fire 
 policy for $5,000 on goods actually worth $10,000 and not con- 
 
40 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 taining a co-insurance clause, the underwriter would be held 
 liable for the first $5,000 of loss. As the principle of co-insur- 
 ance applies to all marine policies, the necessity of careful con- 
 sideration of the value of property insured will be apparent, as 
 any deficiency in insurance leaves with the assured his pro rata 
 proportion of each loss, however trivial. It is equally true that 
 under a marine policy, if no fraud appear, the assured may obtain 
 more than his actual loss in the case of a falling market. The 
 valuation once determined cannot be reopened except by mutual 
 consent. 
 
 Hull Insurance 
 
 Up to this point the consideration of the marine insurance 
 policy has been to a large extent from the viewpoint of cargo. It 
 is of interest to note that the general principles relating to cargo 
 policies are applicable in equal degree to hull and freight interests. 
 Notwithstanding the fact that three general interests appear in 
 marine adventures, namely, cargo, hull, freight, the basic form 
 of policy used in insuring each interest is the same. In the in- 
 surance of hull interests many special forms have been developed 
 for ocean, lake and inland waters and for craft of various ma- 
 terials and modes of propulsion, yet all of these forms basically 
 are the same and have incorporated in their wording the general 
 clauses with respect to perils, sue and labor requirements and 
 average. So with policies covering freight interests often times 
 a cargo form is used, amended by clauses to meet any special 
 conditions peculiarly applicable to freight insurance. 
 
 It will be of interest nevertheless to consider briefly some of 
 the special conditions peculiar to hull policies. These policies are 
 written to cover either a specified voyage of the vessel, or to 
 insure the vessel for a named period of time, usually one year. 
 Mention has already been made of the use of separate valuation 
 clauses in hull policies. Separate valuations are not found in 
 policies on sailing vessels and it was not until the steam era that 
 the need for such clauses appeared. Then with the rapid increase 
 in the size and value of steamers, it was found that the application 
 of the franchise clause of 5% or 3% required for a valid claim 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 41 
 
 an amount so large as to work a hardship on the owner and to 
 serve no useful purpose to the underwriter in shutting out minor 
 claims. Accordingly the custom developed of dividing the valua- 
 tion into two parts, one for hull, the other for machinery. Even 
 this division in the case of valuable vessels required a considerable 
 amount of loss before a claim could be made under the policy, so 
 that a further clause was added providing for payment of loss if 
 amounting to a named sum, usually £1,000 or its normal equivalent 
 $4,850. 
 
 Trading Warranties Clause 
 
 As in the case of cargo policies which always contain a clause 
 describing the geographical limits within which the policy is 
 operative, so in practically all hull policies there is a clause de- 
 scribing the limits within which the vessel may navigate. This 
 clause is known as the "trading warranties" clause. Vessels are 
 of various kinds and each is built with a more or less definite 
 purpose so far as trade is concerned. Some are intended for 
 inland waters only, some for coastwise service, while others are 
 built so staunchly as to be serviceable on any of the "seven seas." 
 The "trading warranties" serve a double purpose; first, to confine 
 the vessel to trade for which it is physically fit, and second, to 
 restrict the vessel as closely as possible to the waters which it will 
 probably navigate during the policy term, in order to reduce the 
 rate of premium. Underwriters will usually grant a lower rate 
 on a vessel closely confined as to trade than on a vessel permitted 
 by the policy to do world-wide trading. 
 
 Thirds Off 
 
 Another feature peculiar to hull policies is the "thirds-off" 
 clause now rapidly falling into disuse because of the employment 
 of iron and steel vessels. A marine insurance policy does not 
 cover usual wear and tear. In the days of wooden ships when a 
 vessel was damaged and new material had to be substituted for 
 old, in many cases wear and tear deterioration was incidentally 
 made good in repairing the casualty damaged parts. Accordingly 
 
42 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 the custom arose of deducting from the cost of the new material 
 one-third, as an offset to such wear and tear deterioration. Many 
 modifications of the general rule, which need not be considered 
 here, were incorporated in some of the "thirds-off" clauses. With 
 the introduction of metal vessels, wear and tear deterioration was 
 relatively slow and in most cases the "thirds-off" clause is waived 
 by a special clause in the policy. 
 
 Collision Clause 
 
 In almost every hull policy there is included what is known 
 as the "collision clause." This portion of the policy is in reality 
 a separate insurance of a liability character. It does not relate to 
 damage incurred'by collision, as such loss is due to a peril of the 
 sea and is covered in the perils clause. The protection furnished 
 by this clause is to cover the legal liability of the owner of the 
 insured vessel for damage done by his vessel to another vessel 
 through collision. Formerly with a view to inducing care on the 
 part of the vessel owner, it was customary to insure only three- 
 fourths of this collision liability. The owners, however, in their 
 mutual protection organizations, known as "Clubs," insured the 
 other one-quarter liability so that the moral effect was lost. It 
 is now usual, in the case of mechanically propelled vessels, to 
 insure the whole collision liability risk. The owners have also 
 insured their other "legal liabilities" with respect to cargo, crew 
 and passengers in their "Clubs," so that underwriters in com- 
 petition with these "Clubs" sometimes incorporate in their hull 
 policies "protection and indemnity" clauses covering these other 
 "owner's legal liability" risks. 
 
 Moral Hazard 
 
 The question of moral hazard, while important, is less promi- 
 nent in marine insurance than in some other forms of under- 
 writing. In the case of cargo risks the insured subject matter 
 after shipment is out of the custody and control of the owner, so 
 that were he tempted to destroy his property he could not do so. 
 In the case of hull insurance likewise, the master for the most 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 43 
 
 part is in control of the vessel and ordinarily it could be de- 
 stroyed only by collusion of owner, master and mariners. Moral 
 hazard from another angle, however, does play a most vital part 
 in hull underwriting, but it goes under the name of "manage- 
 ment." How a vessel or a fleet of vessels is managed by the 
 owner with respect to care, upkeep and personnel, is all important 
 to the marine underwriter. The finest vessel built, poorly man- 
 aged, may be a less desirable risk than an inferior vessel well 
 manned, well equipped and well maintained. 
 
 Freight Insurance 
 
 Freight insurance presents the most difficult form of marine 
 insurance. It relates to an intangible interest arising out of the 
 contractural relation between ship and cargo evidenced by the 
 charter party or bill of lading. Freight, as previously stated, is 
 the term applied to the money paid to the owner or charterer of a 
 vessel for the transportation of cargo. Only by a careful perusal 
 of the bill of lading or charter party can it be determined who 
 has the insurable interest in freight. In some cases freight is pre- 
 paid absolutely and if the goods are lost the owner of the goods 
 also loses the freight which he has paid. He therefore can insure 
 such freight. A similar situation arises where the freight, al- 
 though not prepaid, is "guaranteed vessel lost or not lost," so that 
 in the event of the goods being lost or damaged the cargo owner 
 must nevertheless pay the freight. In these two cases the amount 
 of freight paid or to be paid is usually added to the cost of the 
 goods and insured as cargo. 
 
 If however, the goods are shipped "freight payable at destina- 
 tion on the right delivery of the cargo," then the freight is at the 
 risk of the shipowner and may be insured by him. In addition to 
 these three methods of paying freight, many variations occur, each 
 producing a different insurance problem so that the difficulty of 
 correctly insuring freight will be apparent. 
 
 War Risks 
 
 While the marine insurance policy covers war risks, it is 
 usual for underwriters to delete the war perils from the protection 
 
44 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 of the policy by marginal clauses. When hostilities threaten or 
 actually commence, the marginal clause is cancelled in considera- 
 tion of additional premium and the policy restored to its original 
 condition. The hazard of war risks can be measured only in the 
 light of existing conditions, so that by this method of deleting and 
 reinstating the war perils in the policy, the underwriter has the 
 matter of rates in his control and cannot be committed in advance 
 to rates for insuring a hazard which, when active, varies in in- 
 tensity from day to day. Likewise with respect to the perils of 
 strikes, riots, civil commotions and other labor risks, while these 
 perils are not named in the "perils" clause, it is usual to embody 
 in the policy a clause excepting these hazards. In the event of 
 labor disturbances the policy may then be amended to give pro- 
 tection against these hazards at an agreed rate of premium. The 
 excepting clauses relating to war, strikers, riots, etc., in the cus- 
 tomary form read as follows: 
 
 1. Warranted free of capture, seizure, arrest, restraint or 
 detainment, and the consequences thereof or of any attempt 
 thereat (piracy excepted), and also from all consequences of 
 hostilities or warlike operations, whether before or after dec- 
 laration of war. 
 
 2. Warranted free of loss or damage caused by strikers, 
 locked-out workmen, or persons taking part in labour dis- 
 turbances, or riots or civil commotions. 
 
 Should Clause No. 1 be deleted, Clause No. 3 is to operate 
 as part of this Policy. 
 
 3. Warranted free of any claim based upon loss of, or 
 frustration of, the insured voyage, or adventure, caused by 
 arrests, restraints or detainments of kings, princes or peoples. 
 
 Reinsurance 
 
 The lay mind does not readily visualize the immense capacity 
 of the ordinary freight steamer. Into its immense holds are stowed 
 carload after carload of valuable merchandise. When the loading 
 is completed, many hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of 
 goods, as well as the value of the ship and its freight, are at risk 
 in a single adventure. An underwriter doing a large and varied 
 business cannot control, except in a very limited way by restrict- 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 45 
 
 ing the maximum amount insured under each policy, the aggre- 
 gate amount which he may have at risk in any one adventure. 
 
 This condition necessitates reinsurance by which the under- 
 writer shares his risk with other underwriters. This is done in a 
 variety of ways by sharing on a percentage basis each individual 
 item making up the aggregate amount, by reinsuring all in excess 
 of a given retention, say $100,000, or by reinsuring any loss 
 which he may suffer in excess of a named amount, say $50,000. 
 
 Whatever the method, the result desired is to arrange, so far 
 as is practicable, to have average lines on all insured adventures 
 and thus conform to the basic theory of insurance. All of the 
 principles of marine insurance that apply between owner and 
 underwriter apply with equal, if not greater force, in the rein- 
 suring of interests by underwriter with underwriter. Marine 
 insurance, being international in its scope, sees an interchange of 
 reinsurance between the nationals of various countries. With this 
 interchange passes information of a commercial nature, vital to 
 the interest of foreign nations. Not a few of the large German 
 reinsurance companies were sources of vital commercial informa- 
 tion to the German Government prior to and during the World 
 War. 
 
 A Suggestion 
 
 It is therefore of the greatest importance that, in so far as 
 possible, reinsurance of export overseas risks should find lodgment 
 in the United States. The marine insurance facility is unduly 
 extended. It is at present much broader than the needs of com- 
 merce require. Nevertheless, even now, risks in a single ad- 
 venture are at times so large that the capacity of American 
 Companies is strained to care for them. On the other hand an 
 unduly large facility offering a greater underwriting capacity than 
 commerce requires, results in unhealthful competition. Perhaps 
 nothing would so quickly help the marine insurance situation here 
 as to have the purely fire companies withdraw from direct marine 
 underwriting and content themselves with reinsurance of the 
 marine companies. This would at a single stroke accomplish two 
 needful purposes; first, it would provide a broad and almost limit- 
 
46 
 
 History and Principles 
 
 less American marine reinsurance facility, and second, it would 
 eliminate the present unhealthful condition resulting from over- 
 extended direct marine underwriting inducing cut-throat competi- 
 tion for the immediate purpose of taking care of office overhead 
 expenses. 
 
 Conclusion 
 
 This brief sketch of Marine Insurance has merely considered 
 some of its outstanding features. No other branch of insurance 
 science offers such an enticing field for intensive study. With it 
 is inextricably intertwined the romance of commerce and of the 
 sea. Its paths lead to every city, town and hamlet in the civilized 
 world. From every place that man has explored come the raw 
 and finished products that civilization demands. By every form 
 of conveyance these products are carried. Across the trackless 
 deserts the camel-train bears its costly burden of rugs and spices. 
 From the jungles of Central Africa porter-trains bring out the 
 ivory and the gums. Down the upper reaches of the Amazon the 
 Indian in his rude canoe carries the indispensable rubber and 
 along the precipitous mountain passes of Colombia, the muleteer 
 with his mule-pack bears the coveted coffees of the Magdalena 
 district. And into all these distant places marine insurance ex- 
 tends, enfolding its protecting arms around the commerce of the 
 world, that man may really enjoy the fullness of the earth. 
 
Marine Insurance 
 
 47 
 
 ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE EARLIEST 
 KNOWN CONTRACT OF INSURANCE 
 
 In the name of God, Amen. I, Georgius Lecavellum, citizen 
 of Genoa, acknowledge to you, Bartholomeus Bassus, son of 
 Bartholomeus, that I have received and accepted from you in 
 Genoa, one hundred and seven pounds (of silver) as a free and 
 friendly loan. I renounce every advantage in law of requiring 
 proof of having acquired, accepted or counted said money. These 
 one hundred and seven pounds, in Genoa, or its equivalent in 
 money, I agree and promise in solemn covenant to return and re- 
 store to you or your acknowledged messenger by myself or my 
 representative. 
 
 Being well preserved and sound in mind, that if your ship, 
 called the Santa Clara, which is now being prepared in the port of 
 Genoa, God willing, to go and sail presently to Majorca, shall 
 have gone and sailed, having been navigated by direct route from 
 the port of Genoa to Majorca, shall have arrived at that place safe 
 and sound before the expiration of the next six months coming, 
 then in that case the present instrument is null and void as if it had 
 not been made. I personally assume all the risk and responsi- 
 bility for said amount of money until said boat shall have arrived 
 at Majorca, being navigated by direct route as above. And also 
 if said boat shall be safe and sound in some other place, before 
 said six months, the present instrument is likewise null and void 
 as if it had not been made. And likewise if said boat shall have 
 changed its course said instrument is null and void and as if it 
 had not been made. 
 
 In said manner and under said conditions I promise to make 
 said settlement, otherwise I promise to you to pay and incur the 
 penalty of double the stipulated amount of said money together 
 with restitution of damages and expenses which may arise on 
 that account or be sustained in litigation, the aforesaid remaining 
 secure under the pledge and security of my property, goods and 
 possessions. 
 
 Made in Genoa, in a room in the house of Carlus and Boni- 
 facus brothers of Ususmares, in the year from the birth of our 
 Lord 1347, following the custom in Genoa, on the 23d. day 
 October about eventide. 
 
 Witnesses Nicolaus of Tacius, draper, and Johannes of 
 Rachus son of Bonanatus a citizen of Genoa. 
 
M 
 
mwmsm. of c$&wm 
 
 LOS AHGSLES 
 LIBRARY