1 
 
 BV 
 
 825,52 
 
 W5 
 
 JRfCHtn Cftit ZtMie 
 
 XI 
 
 alifornii 
 jional 
 
 THE BREAD OF THE 
 EUCHARIST 
 
 REGINALD MAXWELL WOOLLEY, B.D. (Camb.) 
 
 Rtctor and Vicar ^Minting 
 
 A, R. MOWBRAY & CO. Ltd. 
 London ; 28 Margaret Street, Oxford Circus, W. 
 
 Oxford : 9 High Street 
 
 Milwaukee, U.S.A. : Yoxjng Churchman Co. 
 
 1913 
 
 [AU Rights Rfserved'l
 
 ^ LIBRARY 
 
 UNIVERSITY OP 
 CALIFORNIA 
 t SAN 0IE«O 

 
 I" / 
 
 ^IL
 
 JEWISH PASSOVER CAKE 
 
 5} inches by V,-,-inch 
 
 The cakes are iinl smooth and white, hut vnievcn and slightly scorched 
 
 {Frontispiece
 
 ilfcutn €fu6 Zvada 
 
 XI 
 
 THE BREAD OF THE 
 EUCHARIST 
 
 REGINALD MAXWELL WOOLLEY, B.D. (Camb.) 
 
 Rector and Vicar of Minti7tg 
 
 A. R. MOWBRAY & CO. Ltd. 
 London : 28 Margaret Street, Oxford Circus, W. 
 
 Oxford : 9 High Street 
 Milwaukee, U.S.A. : Young Churchman Co. 
 
 [All Rights Reserved^
 
 TO 
 
 E. M. W.
 
 PREFACE 
 
 I HAVE tried in the following Tract to make use of all the 
 material extant that bears on the subject, though, doubtless, 
 some has escaped my notice. 
 
 I have many acknowledgments to make to those who 
 have readily given me information during the preparation 
 of the work. 
 
 In particular my grateful thanks are due to the Bishop 
 of Moray and Ross, who has most kindly overlooked my 
 translations of the East Syrian " Order for renewing the 
 Holy Leaven " and the West Syrian " Form for preparing 
 the Eucharistic bread," and making the very many cor- 
 rections which were necessary. Also my thanks are due 
 to Mr. F. C. Conybeare of Oxford, who most generously 
 placed at my disposal his translations of certain, as yet 
 unpublished, Armenian documents. 
 
 The Syriac text from which the West Syrian " Form 
 for preparing the Eucharistic bread " is translated was 
 procured for me by Dr. Wigram, Head of the Assyrian 
 Mission. 
 
 The East Syrian " Order of the preparation of the 
 Oblation " is reprinted here by permission of Mr. Bright- 
 man and the Delegates of the Oxford University Press. 
 
 Most of the photographs of Eastern breads were pro-
 
 vi Preface 
 
 cured for me by Mr. Brightman. The Russian and Greek. 
 Orthodox breads, photographs of which, with the Passover- 
 cake, were made for me by Mr. C. F, Ohiey of Northamp- 
 ton, were kindly procured by the Rev. H. J. Fynes- 
 Clinton. 
 
 I would like to add that it is extremely difficult to get 
 accurate and trustworthy information as to details in the uses 
 of the different Eastern Churches. I think, however, and 
 hope, that I have not been guilty of any misrepresentations.
 
 CONTENTS 
 
 PAGE 
 
 I. TyE USES OF THE CHURCH BEFORE THE SCHISM 
 
 OF EAST AND WEST ..... I 
 
 II. THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN EAST AND WEST . 23 
 
 III. ENGLAND ....... 3O 
 
 IV. THE EASTERN CHURCHES (wiTH CERTAIN DOCU- 
 
 MENTS). ....... 44
 
 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 
 
 JEWISH PASSOVER-CAKE 
 
 Frontispiece 
 
 FACING PAGE 
 
 GREEK ORTHODOX : EUCHARISTIC BREAD AND EULOGIA (JERU- 
 SALEM) ....... 
 
 RUSSIAN: EUCHARISTIC BREAD AND LOAF OFFERED FOR SPECIAL 
 PURPOSES ...... 
 
 COPTIC EUCHARISTIC LOAF . . , . 
 
 THE MAUNDY THURSDAY EULOGIA (cOPTIc) . 
 
 ABYSSINIAN EUCHARISTIC BREAD . 
 
 WEST SYRIAN (jACOBITE) LOAF 
 
 ARMENIAN WAFER . . . . . 
 
 EAST SYRIAN (nESTORIAN) LOAVES 
 
 44 
 
 45 
 
 46 
 
 47 
 
 48 
 
 49 
 57 
 63
 
 THE BREAD OF THE 
 EUCHARIST 
 
 I 
 
 THE USES OF THE CHURCH BEFORE THE 
 SCHISM OF EAST AND WEST 
 
 The matter requisite for the due celebration of the Eucharist 
 is bread and wine. 
 
 Bread is a cake made of vvheaten flour and water. It 
 has been customary, for ages, to add to this the ferment 
 of leaven to cause the loaf to rise. 
 
 Among the Jews, though leavened bread was in ordinary 
 use, for certain religious observances in which bread was 
 used the bread so used was unleavened. In some cases 
 in which it was used the omission of leaven had some 
 special historical significance, e.g. at the Passover ; in other 
 cases, such as the ordinance of the Shewbread, and the use 
 of bread in sacrifice, unleavened bread was used probably 
 for the sake of convenience, as keeping better. 
 
 In the Christian Church there have long been two 
 different customs in the use of bread for the purposes of 
 the Eucharist. The Oriental Churches have used ordinary 
 leavened bread, which use, they maintain, is the unchanged 
 immemorial custom of the Church from the beginning. 
 The Western Church, on the other hand, has long used 
 I
 
 2 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 unleavened bread only, and has based her practice on the 
 alleged use by our Lord Himself at the Institution of 
 the Blessed Sacrament. 
 
 The question, which would seem unimportant in itself 
 if both leavened and unleavened are equally bread, assumed 
 an importance when the two uses were made a matter of 
 controversy to such an extent that their diversity of use 
 became one of the pretexts of the schism between East 
 and West. 
 
 The Anglican Church has compromised. Since the 
 time of the Second Prayer Book of 1552, while regarding 
 " unleavened bread " as the normal use, she permits, if 
 there is any particular reason for it, the use of ordinary 
 leavened bread, so long as it is of the best and purest that 
 can be procured. 
 
 When the controversy first arose between East and 
 West, the Easterns pointed to the immemorial use of 
 the Church in using leavened bread, and denounced the 
 Western use of unleavened as a novelty. 
 
 The Roman Church, seeking support for its practice, 
 adduced the circumstances of the Institution, pointing out 
 that, since this took place at a Passover-meal, our Lord 
 Himself instituted the Sacrament in unleavened bread. 
 The Greeks retorted by denying that our Lord had 
 instituted the Blessed Sacrament at a Paschal meal, and 
 by declaring that the accounts of the Institution prove 
 this by the use of the word apros for " bread," a word 
 which by itself cannot mean " unleavened bread," but 
 ordinary, that is to say, leavened, bread only. 
 
 The question as to whether the Eucharist was instituted 
 at a Passover meal or not is still unsettled. We have to 
 face the fact frankly that the Synoptists and St. John 
 contradict one another. The Synoptists put the meal at 
 which the Sacrament^ was instituted on the first day of
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 3 
 
 unleavened bread, and evidently regard the meal as a 
 Paschal Supper. St. John, on the other hand, as definitely 
 implies that the supper took place before the Passover. 
 
 The meal itself seems to have been intended by our 
 Lord as a Paschal Supper, whether it was on the proper 
 day or not. It is a question into which we cannot enter 
 here. The facts are as follows : 
 
 Either it was a Paschal Supper as the Synoptists indicate, 
 and the bread used in that case was certainly unleavened, 
 or the supper took place the night before the proper day 
 for the Paschal commemoration ; but it would seem, perhaps, 
 probable that even so the bread would have been unleavened, 
 for during the few days before the Passover and up till 
 midday on the 14th of Nisan the houses were being rid 
 of leaven. 
 
 There we must leave it. The question is still unsettled. 
 The probabilities seem to be much in favour of the view 
 that this was the proper Paschal Supper, and therefore that 
 our Lord, in the Institution of the Blessed Sacrament, 
 Himself used unleavened bread. 
 
 The next question to be considered is whether the word 
 apT09, which is used by the Synoptists and by St. Paul 
 in his account of the Institution, can properly denote 
 unleavened bread. In the controversy of the eleventh 
 century this was denied by the Greeks. 
 
 The contention of the Greeks seems to be true. *A/3to9 
 is properly " leavened bread," and is not used by itself 
 of " unleavened bread." If it is so used it is always 
 qualified by some other word — thus, ctpro? a^v/xo?. In 
 the LXX this is the case. "Apros alone is never used of 
 unleavened. In the case of the Shewbread, for instance, 
 which was unleavened, it is qualified — apros Trpodecre(o<;. It 
 is true that at the Council of Nymphseum the Latins
 
 4 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 adduced Lev. vii. 12 as affording an example of apro? used 
 of " unleavened." In this passage aprovs eK cre/mtSaXew? 
 occurs in the LXX against the Hebrew nr^'O rh>n, but the 
 Greek translator did not read nivo here, for he translates the 
 word which occurs again in the verse by oi^vjxa. There- 
 fore this quotation proves nothing. 
 
 In the same way, panis^ which is the equivalent of 
 apro?, does not by itself represent unleavened bread. 
 Indeed, the use of unleavened bread seems to have been 
 almost unheard of in the West in early days, for the words to 
 denote it, azyma and (pants) infermentatus are both late words, 
 and Tacitus can speak of unleavened as " iudaicus panis." ^ 
 
 But, if this is so, how are we to explain the use of the 
 Synoptists and St. Paul if, as we have suggested, the proba- 
 bilities are that oar Lord used unleavened bread.'' It may be 
 explained by the theory that, if the Synoptists realised that 
 they were speaking of a Paschal meal, and realised all that 
 this implied, such as the use of unleavened, then the context 
 would be sufficient to supply the qualification to dpTo<;. 
 
 This is not, perhaps, a very likel)' explanation. The 
 true explanation is probably that the Kvangelists, writing 
 many years after the events which they record, and when 
 they were familiar with the use of leavened bread only in 
 the Eucharist, used apro? in the ordinary signification, 
 quite overlooking the fact that at a Passover meal it would 
 be unleavened bread that was used. 
 
 In the Acts of the Apostles the expression " breaking 
 of bread " certainly includes, in some cases at least, the 
 Eucharist. Would unleavened bread be specially prepared .^^ 
 It was true that the Eucharist was the new Passover ; but 
 it was the new, not the old, and there is no sign of the 
 other Jewish Passover observances being applied to every 
 celebration of the Eucharist. 
 
 ' Hzsi. V. 4.
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 5 
 
 Again, St. Paul lays stress on the '* one loaf" of the 
 Eucharist,^ although no conclusive argument can be deduced 
 from these words. Then it is hardly probable that this 
 could cover the use of unleavened bread. With a large 
 number of communicants it would have been necessary to 
 have a very large unleavened cake. 
 
 It is true that among the Armenians only one wafer is 
 used, but communion is there given by intinction, be it 
 remembered. Also, if unleavened bread was used by St. 
 Paul, it would be due to his regarding the Eucharist as the 
 Christian Passover, and in the old Passover not one 
 unleavened cake, but several were used. 
 
 Then, again, the question of the Gentile converts comes 
 in. Even if the Jewish party did use unleavened bread in 
 the Eucharist — a use of which there is no shadow of a sign 
 — it would seem to be clear, from the decision of the Council 
 of Jerusalem in its ordinances for the Gentiles, that this was 
 not the practice of the Gentile churches. There would 
 almost certainly have been some mention of this if it was to 
 be the use of the Church at large. 
 
 If the use of unleavened bread ever existed in the early 
 Church (as it did among the Ebionites in the days of 
 Epiphanius), we may suspect that it was only among the 
 Judaising sects, which formed a very small and diminishing 
 part of the Church Catholic. 
 
 When we pass on from the New Testament to Patristic 
 writings, we find still no definite statements on the subject. 
 Nearly all the evidence is by deduction from the incidental 
 remarks. 
 
 The use of the word apro? itself is not absolutely 
 conclusive ; at any rate, it is not sufficiently so to settle the 
 question by itselt, 
 
 ' " For we, being many, are one bread and one body . for we are all 
 partakers of that one bread " (i Cor. x. 17).
 
 6 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 We have seen that Tacitus, by speaking of unleavened 
 bread as " iudaicus panis," shows that, to sav the least, 
 such unleavened bread was not in ordinary use among the 
 Romans. 
 
 Nor is there any ground for thinking that it was in 
 ordinary or common use among other Gentile peoples. 
 When, however, decrees of Councils deal with the subject 
 of the Eucharistic bread, we get much more definite evi- 
 dence — evidence all the more valuable as showing indirectly 
 the causes that led to the introduction of new uses. The 
 absence of all reference in the earlier Councils tends to show 
 that there was only one use in earlier times, and that general 
 to the whole Church. 
 
 It remains for us, then, to consider the evidence which 
 can be culled from Patristic writings and conciliar decrees 
 until the time when the difference of uses became a matter 
 of bitterest controversy between the two great divisions of 
 the Church Catholic. 
 
 The earliest work among Patristic writings is the 
 Didache, a work which, in its present form, is not later 
 than A.D. 130. 
 
 Here the bread of the Eucharist is spoken of as " the 
 broken [bread] " {to KXaafia). By itself this tells us 
 nothing, but the words of the consecration form in which 
 the expression occurs are enlightening : "flcnTep rjv tovto 
 Kkdafxa hieaKopTTLcr^evov eTrduo) roiv opiotv koX crvva.y^dkv 
 iyevero ev, k.t.X. (c. ix). 
 
 Here St. Paul's reference to the " one loaf" is at once 
 recalled to the mind, and there would seem to be very little 
 doubt that the writer is thinking of the communicants all 
 receiving from one loaf If this is so, the bread used was 
 probably, as we have seen when discussing St. Paul's words, 
 a leavened loaf. 
 
 Passing on to a little beyond the middle of the second
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 7 
 
 century, we find St. Justin Martyr explaining: "ETretra 
 npocrffiepeTai tco irpoecnoiTL tcov aSi\(f)(i)u dpTo<; kol noTujpi.ov 
 v8aT09 KOL KpoLfxaTo^ i^yJpol. I. § 65). Here, again, there 
 seems to be a reference to one loaf. It is apTo% " a loaf," 
 not 6 dpTo<;, " bread." 
 
 Again, the careful statement of Justin (//', § 66) that, 
 after consecration, the bread is no longer kolvo^ apro9, perhaps 
 has some bearing on the question. St. Irenaeus, St. Cyril of 
 Jerusalem, and St. Gregory of Nyssa use the same expression 
 in the same connection, and St. Cyril also uses the equivalent 
 expressions, dpros Xtrds, \/;tX6? apro?. 
 
 Again in Ps. -Ambrose {de Sacr. IV. iv. 14) we find such 
 words as these : " Tu forte dicis ; meus panis est usitatus." 
 To the point, too, is the story of a woman who laughed when 
 St. Gregory the Great was about to administer to her the 
 Bodj of the Lord, and afterwards explained that she had 
 laughed " because you called the bread, which I knew 1 had 
 made with my own hands, the Body of Christ." ^ 
 
 Surely these expressions seem to imply that the bread 
 used at the Eucharist was ordinary ; that is, leavened. It is 
 most improbable that none of the writers quoted above 
 should have commented on the fact if the bread was 
 unleavened when using such words. Indeed, if the bread 
 contemplated by Ps. -Ambrose was unleavened it was cer- 
 tainly not " usitatus." 
 
 The story of St. Gregory and the irreverent woman brings 
 up the whole question of the oblations of bread and wine by 
 the people. The very fact that for centuries it was the 
 custom for the people to offer the bread and wine to be used 
 in the celebration of the mysteries seems to me to argue 
 strongly in favour of the use of ordinary, i.e. leavened bread. 
 Bona even goes so far as to say that the practice proves the 
 use of leavened ; and it is interesting to note that, in the 
 
 ' Life of Gregory, by John the Deacon, ii. § 41.
 
 8 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 three Rites in which this oblation by the people survives, 
 the Consecration of a Bishop, the Consecration of a King, 
 and the Rite of Canonisation, the loaves then offered are of 
 leavened bread. ^ 
 
 In the j'lcts of Thomas ^ a work of about the date 200, 
 we read : " And the Apostle bade his deacon to prepare the 
 [bread of] fraction." - Here the word is r<h\^ = Gr. 
 KKdo-fxa. Again in the same work (p. '<'«*i) Mygdonia, one 
 of the Apostle's converts, bids her nurse bring for the 
 Eucharist " mixed wine and water in a cup and one whole 
 loaf." Here the word for loaf is the ordinary word ptLsouJli. 
 Evidently it is an ordinary loaf of leavened bread which is 
 meant. The word rdisa^A ( = H. orh = Gr. dpros) is never 
 used, so far as I know, without a qualifying word of " un- 
 leavened bread," which is signified by k'ta^. About the 
 same time, but probably a little earlier, the Gnostic Ptole- 
 maeus, in his letter to Flora, speaks of the observances and 
 usages of the old law which were merely symbolical as having 
 now been done away with. Among these observances of the 
 old dispensation he mentions unleavened bread. He says : 
 To, iu TTpo(T<f>opaL<i Xeyo) Kai TrepLTOjxfj . . . kol d^vjxois koI 
 Tot9 TotovTots voyiodeTiqOevra' Travra yap ravra elKouc^ koI 
 avfi^oXa ovra, Trj<; dkr]0eLa<; (fiauepajdeicrrj^, fxeTereOr] (iii. 9). 
 
 In the Coptic version of the earliest Church Orders which 
 is probably to be dated somewhere between 250-300, in the 
 account of the Eucharist which follows on the Rites of 
 Baptism, in speaking of the consecration of the bread, the 
 words are: "[The Bishop] shall give thanks over a loaf." It is 
 difficult to believe that such an expression could cover a use 
 ot unleavened bread. The word used is the ordinary word 
 for " bread," and equivalent to apros. And again, in another 
 Syriac work, The Acts of John the Son of Zebedee^ belonging 
 
 ' Bona, Rerum Liturgicarum, I. xxiii. iii. 
 - Wright, Apocryphal Acts, p. ja.^1
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 9 
 
 to the third or perhaps fourth century (and not to be confused 
 with the earlier Greek y^cts of John) ^ the Apostle, when about 
 to celebrate the Euciharist, asks for " pure white bread to be 
 brought " to him. Here the bread is specified. It is 
 *' white bread," i.e. " wheaten bread." The word used is the 
 ordinary word, r^Lrmjja. 
 
 St. Cyprian does not give us any definite information, 
 but refers again to the old figure of the many grains being 
 gathered into one loaf. In his letter on the mixed chalice 
 (£/). Ixiii. 13) he says: "Nee Corpus Domini potest esse 
 farina sola aut aqua sola, nisi utrumque adunatum fuerit et 
 copulatum et panis unius compage solidatum. Quo et ipso 
 Sacramento populus noster ostenditur adunatus, ut quemad- 
 modum grana multa in unum collecta et commolita et 
 commixta panem unum faciunt, sic in Christo qui est panis 
 caelestis, unum sciamus esse corpus, cui coniunctus, sit 
 noster numerus et adunatus." 
 
 This passage has sometimes been quoted as evidence of 
 the use of unleavened bread in the Eucharist by the African 
 Church of Cyprian's day. But the passage does not really 
 touch the point. Leaven is not an ingredient, but a ferment, 
 and its use in making bread would not affect Cyprian's 
 argument here at all. 
 
 Origen has been quoted in evidence of the use of 
 unleavened bread in the Eucharist. But the passage in 
 question {in Matt, xii., P.G. xiii. col. 989) has nothing at 
 all to do with the Eucharist. He is commenting on our 
 Lord's words, " Take heed of the leaven of the Pharisees." 
 Origen comments thus : " You must know that, wherever 
 leaven is mentioned, it is used allegorically for ' teaching,' 
 whether in the law or in the other scriptures which come 
 after the law. And so leaven is never offered at the altar, 
 for prayers must not be like learnt lessons, but just simply 
 the asking of things good for us from God."
 
 lo The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 The words " leaven is never offered at the altar " 
 (ouTO) 8e fXTJ7TOT€ ^vfXT) ov TTpoafjiepeTaL inl tov Ovaiacniqpiov) 
 have nothing to do with the Eucharist or the Christian altar, 
 but refer to the directions as to sacrifice in the law, such as 
 that contained in Leviticus ii. ii : "No meat offering which 
 ye shall bring unto the Lord shall be made with leaven : 
 for ye shall burn no leaven, nor any honey, in any off^ering 
 of the Lord made by fire." 
 
 The attitude of the Fathers generally to the usages of 
 the Jews, and the contemptuous language in which they 
 refer to the use of unleavened bread among the Jews, makes 
 it difficult to believe that the use of unleavened bread in the 
 Eucharist was known to the writers in question. 
 
 Thus Augustine can say : " Illi \^sc. Judsei] ergo ita 
 sunt tanquam Cain cum signo. Sacrificia vero quas ibi 
 fiebant ablata sunt, et quod eis remansit ad signum Cain 
 iam perfectum est et nesciunt. Agnum occidunt, azyma 
 commedunt. ' Pascha nostra immolatus est Christus,' quid 
 de azymis? ' Itaque,' inquit, 'diem festum celebremus, non 
 in fermento veteri neque in fermento malitias et malig- 
 nitatis.' Ostendit quid sit vetus fermentum, vetus farina 
 est, et acuit : * sed in azymis sinceritatis et veritatis.' In 
 umbra remanserunt, solem glorias ferre non possunt. Jam 
 nos in luce sumus, tenemus Corpus Christi, tenemus 
 sanguinem Christi " {Enarr. in Ps. xxxix.). 
 
 The Western mind of later days found in a more literal 
 understanding of the passage which St. Augustine quotes 
 from St. Paul a justification of the use of unleavened bread 
 in the Eucharist. 
 
 St. Chrysostom uses language to the same eff^ect (de 
 prodit. Juda. ii. 3): AoKovcrt {sc. ot lovSatot) -na-a-yci. -rvoiCiv 
 eVetS^ yv(ji[i.rj avaiayyvTM to. a^v/xa irpo^aWovcnv 01 anept- 
 Tp.r)TOL Ttti? /capStats. ttox;, elne jxoi, to iracrx^ eTTiTeXets w 
 'louSate ; o vaos KarlcTKaTTTai, 6 jBcofxo^ dvyjprjTai, ra ayia
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West ii 
 
 T(t)v ayioiv TreTraTrjTaL, Trd<Trj<; 6v(TLa<; etSo? XeXvrat . . . 6pd<; 
 vox; OLKadapra tol a^vfxa ; ttw? irapdvoixo^; -q ioprt] ; tt^o? 
 7rda)(a lovSatKou nore aXX' ikvOrj vvv ; kol eTrrjkOe to 
 TTvevfjLaTLKOv Trda)(a o 7rape8i8ou tote 6 XpicrTo^ icrSiovriav 
 ydp, K.T.X. 
 
 So St. Chrysostom classes the use of unleavened bread 
 with other ceremonies of the old law which have now been 
 done away with. Surely he could not have said that to, 
 d^vfjia were aKddapra if he knew of unleavened bread being 
 used in the Eucharist. This extract from St. Chrysostom 
 is also interesting as showing that he believed the Blessed 
 Sacrament to have been instituted during a Passover meal. 
 This was strenuously denied by the Greeks in their contro- 
 versy with the Latins at a later date. 
 
 We find the same attitude as regards unleavened bread 
 in Paulinus of Nola, a Western (353-431)- -^^ thus speaks 
 of the Jewish rites : 
 
 Inde fugae memores, etiam nunc azyma sumunt 
 Judasi solo retinentes nomine gentem 
 Infermentatis pulsi quia panibus olim 
 iEgypto fecere fugam ; paribus modo signis " 
 Per patrios, sed iam per inania sabbata, ritus 
 Antiqui recolunt vestigia grata timoris. 
 Nam frustra veterem vacua sub imagine legem 
 Exercent, verum nobis quia Pascha replevit 
 Unus pro cunctis Patri datus hostia Christus 
 Et quia corpus adest vitas perit umbra figura. 
 
 Carmen 26, 45. 
 
 Epiphanius, speaking of the Ebionites, says that, while 
 they celebrate the Eucharist in imitation of the Church, 
 yet they use unleavened bread for the bread, and water alone 
 in the cup. This is evidently a peculiarity ; and his drawing 
 attention to their use of unleavened bread as a peculiarity
 
 12 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 shows that he knew of no such practice in the Church. 
 His words are : MvaTTJpia 8e hrjdev reXoucrt Kara iiiyi-qcnv 
 TOiv ayiiov iv ttJ iKK\r]cria dno eviavTOv ec5 iviavTOv ota 
 al^u^x-oiv, Kol TO aX\o ix4po<^ tov [xvcrT-qpiov 8t' vSaros jjlovov 
 (Haer. xxx. i6). 
 
 The 1 06 Canons of Basil ^ indirectly bear on the subject. 
 Canon 98 runs thus : "The deacons who prepare and bring 
 in the offerings shall examine the broken bread, whether 
 by chance it remains over from the previous day, or is 
 burnt, or has any blemish, that they commit no sin. For 
 these mysteries represent the lamb which was slain in the 
 time of the Hebrews in Egypt. With regard to this lamb 
 it is enjoined that none be taken in which is any blemish 
 or defect. How, then, can it be so with the bread which 
 they prepare for the purpose of the mysteries ?'' 
 
 The Canon goes on to draw comparisons between the 
 Passover lamb and the bread, showing the spiritual sig- 
 nificance of the Passover rules as applied to the Eucharist. 
 The baking signifies the spiritual fire of Baptism by which 
 all have been purified who partake of the Eucharist. The 
 seven days of unleavened bread before the eating of the 
 lamb are meant to signify the preparation of him who was 
 to partake of the Holy Mysteries. 
 
 It is significant that the parallel is drawn between the 
 bread of the Eucharist and the lam/^ of the Passover. The 
 unleavened bread of the Passover Supper is actually men- 
 tioned, but has evidently no reference to the bread of the 
 Eucharist in the mind of a writer who could not fail to 
 seize upon the parallel if unleavened bread had been the 
 use in the Eucharist with v/hich he was familiar. So this 
 Canon, while saying nothing directly, yet makes it almost 
 
 ' This collection of Canons, probably Egyptian, dates from about the 
 beginning of the fifth century. They are to be found in Riedel, Kirchen- 
 rechtsquellen des Patriarchats Alexatidi'ien.
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 13 
 
 certain that the writer had no knowledge of any Christian 
 use of unleavened bread, or at least in the Eucharist. 
 
 In the Liber Pontificalis there is an allusion to a practice 
 in the Roman Church of the fourth century which may 
 have some bearing on the question. The language does not, 
 however, very clearly explain what was the actual custom. 
 
 Of Miltiades we read : " Ab eodem die fecit ut oblationes 
 consecratas per ecclesias ex consecratu Episcopi dirigentur, 
 quod declaratur fermentum." ^ 
 
 In the same work we are told of Pope Siricius : " Hie 
 constituit ut nullus presbiter missas celebraret per omnem 
 ebdomadem nisi consecratum Episcopi loci designati susci- 
 peret declaratum quod nominatum ' fermentum.' " ^ 
 
 Mgr. Duchesne's comment on these somewhat obscure 
 statements is as follows : " Le ' fermentum ' etait une 
 portion du pain consacre a la messe episcopale que Ton 
 envoyait le dimanche aux pretres des titres ou paroisses 
 urbaines pour etre joint a leur propre consecration. C'etait 
 une symbole de Tunite de I'eglise locale, et en particulier 
 de son unite etroite dans la celebration du mystere 
 eucharistique." 
 
 The custom in somewhat later days is explained by 
 the letter of Pope Innocent to Decentius : " De fermento 
 quod die dominica per titulos mittimus, siiperflue nos 
 consulere voluisti cum omnes ecclesias nostras intra civi- 
 tatem sint constitutas, quarum presbyteri quia die ipsa 
 propter pleberh sibi creditum nobiscum convenire non 
 possunt, idcirco fermentum a nobis confectum per acolythos 
 accipiunt ut se a nostra communione maxime ilia die non 
 iudicent separatos. Quod per parochias fieri debere non 
 puto, quia non longe portanda sunt sacramenta. ..." 
 
 Thus it is quite clear that, in the time of Pope Innocent, 
 
 ' Liber Pontificalis, ed. Duchesne, i. p. i68. Paris, 1886-1892. 
 - Ib.^ i. p. 216.
 
 l4 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 a portion of the Consecrated Bread was distributed from 
 the Pope's Mass among the neighbouring churches. In 
 the eighth century in the Papal Mass itself the portion 
 of the Host used for the commixture, called the " Sancta," 
 was a portion of the Sacrament reserved from a previous 
 celebration to maintain the unity of the Eucharist. If the 
 Pope himself did not celebrate, the portion of the Host 
 used at the commixture was reserved from a celebration 
 at which the Pope had officiated, and was in this case called 
 the " fermentum." ^ 
 
 We see here the same idea as that which underlies the 
 practice of the East Syrians and the West Syrians, who 
 both save a portion of the dough at the making of the 
 Eucharistic bread to be mixed with the next making, so 
 as to maintain a unity of the loaf. It is possible that some- 
 thing of the sort may have been the original custom of 
 the Roman Church, and that it developed into this practice 
 of reserving a portion of the Consecrated Bread for use at 
 the commixture. At any rate, the Pope's Eucharist leavened, 
 as it were, the Eucharist in the other churches, and the idea 
 of unity and one Eucharist was so preserved. But, as we 
 see, this practice has no bearing whatever on the question 
 as to whether leavened or unleavened bread was used. 
 
 Perhaps it may be added, as we are dealing with this 
 custom of the Roman Church, that St. Thomas Aquinas states 
 that St. Gregory the Great says that it was the custom of the 
 Roman Church of his day to celebrate with unleavened bread : 
 " Dicit enim Beatus Gregorius in Registro : ' Romana 
 Ecclesia ofFert azymos panes propterea quod Dominus sine 
 commistione uUa suscepit carnem ' " (P. III., Q. Ixxiv. 
 Art. iv.). This quotation is not, however, to be found in 
 any of the extant writings of St. Gregory, and St. Thomas 
 has apparently made a mistake in assigning it to him. 
 ' Ordo Romamis I. 22.
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 15 
 
 In the valuable Homilies of Narsai, a Syrian Father 
 whose descriptions of the liturgy of his day (t502) are of 
 the greatest interest and importance, we find nothing said as 
 to the use of leavened or unleavened bread. In Homily xvii., 
 " an exposition of the Mysteries," he says : " He now 
 begins to break the Body little by little, that it may be easy 
 to distribute to all the receivers." ^ The context makes it 
 fairly clear that only one loaf is used, and we may fairly 
 conclude that, if unleavened bread had been used, some 
 explanation would have been given in a work of this sort. 
 
 The Venerable Bede (673-731) tells us that in the time 
 of Mellitus (Bishop of London, c. 603) " panis nitidus " 
 was used at the Eucharist. Bede tells us that after the 
 death of Saberct, King of Essex, his three heathen sons came 
 and demanded of Mellitus that he should give them that 
 " white bread " (" panem nitidum ") which he used to give to 
 their father. - 
 
 '* Panis nitidus " is not, however, wafer-bread, but white 
 or wheaten bread in contradistinction to cakes made of other 
 meal."^ 
 
 Moreover, I think that it may be questioned whether 
 the unleavened bread was at first white like that of to-day; 
 more probably it was like the Jewish Passover-cakes, some- 
 what brown and scorched. 
 
 Bede himself comments on the Jewish Passover and rites 
 as follows {in Luc. xxii.) : " Quia videlicet et Pascha dies 
 in azymis panibus est celebrari preceptus et nos quasi pascha 
 perpetuum facientes semper ex hoc mundo transire prasci- 
 pimur. Una quippe die agno immolato ad vesperam septem 
 ex ordine dies sequuntur azymorum. Quia Christus Jesus 
 
 • The Homilies of Narsai, Dom R. H. Connolly, M.A. (Cambridge, 1909), 
 
 p. 23. 
 
 « Bede, Hist. Eccl. II. v. 
 
 ^ Aiithimus, a contemporary of Charlemagne, speaks of " panem nitidum, 
 bene fermentatum et non azimum " (de Observat, Cibantm).
 
 i6 The Bread of the Eucharist* 
 
 semel pro nobis In plenitudine temporum passus est carne, 
 per omne nobis huius saeculi tempus quod septem diebus 
 agitur in azymis sinceritatis et veritatis praecipit esse 
 vivendum." 
 
 Here, surely, Bede must have mentioned the use of 
 unleavened bread in the Eucharist if such was the use in 
 his day. But it is noticeable here, and in other like passages 
 from other Fathers which I have quoted, that the unleavened 
 bread in the Passover represents that which was to come, 
 and when the law was fulfilled in the new dispensation the 
 shadow, the *' umbra," the law and all its observances and 
 ceremonies, had fulfilled their purpose and had passed away. 
 It is almost inconceivable that in these passages, all dealing 
 with the same subject, there would not have been at least in 
 some of them some reference to the use of unleavened bread 
 in the Christian Passover if any such use had been known 
 to the authors. 
 
 We come now to definite evidence. 
 
 In the XV 1th Council of 'Toledo (693) the question of 
 the bread used in the Eucharist and the irreverent careless- 
 ness of the clergy is dealt with in Canon VI. : " Adconventus 
 etenim nostri agnitionem delatum est, eo quod in quibusdam 
 Hispaniarum partibus, quidam sacerdotum, partim nescentia 
 implicit!, partim temerario ausu provocati, non panes mundos 
 et studio praeparatos supra mensam Domini in sacrificio 
 ofFerunt, sed passim quomodo unumquemque aut necessitas 
 impulerit aut voluntas coegerit, de panibus suis usibus 
 praeparatis crustulam in rotunditatem auferunt, eamque 
 super altare cum vino et aqua pro sacro libamine offerunt." 
 
 The Canon goes on to adduce the example of our Lord 
 against such irreverent practices, and concludes : 
 
 " Unde temeritatis huius aut nescientiae cupicntes ponere 
 terminum, id unanimitatis nostra,' delegit conventus ut non 
 aliter panis in altari Domini sacerdotali benedictione sancti-
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 17 
 
 ficandus praeparatus, nisi integer et nitidus qui ex studio 
 fuerit praeparatus neque grande aliquid sed modica tantum 
 oblata secundum quod ecclesiastica consuetudo retentat : 
 cuius reliquias aut ad conservandum modico loculo, absque 
 aliqui iniuria facilius conserventur, aut si ad consumendum 
 fuerit necessarium, non ventrem illius qui sumpserit," etc. 
 
 In Canon X. of the English Council of Chelsea (787) the 
 same matter is dealt with shortly. 
 
 " Oblationes quoque fidelium tales fiant ut panis sit non 
 crusta." 
 
 These two Councils are interesting and definite. They 
 deal with the irreverence and casual conduct of the clergy. 
 Frequently, instead of using bread which his been specially 
 and reverently prepared for this holy use, the clergy have 
 just taken bread from their own larders, any piece of a loaf 
 being sufficient, and, cutting it into a round cake, have used 
 it in the celebration. It is evident that this is not unleavened 
 bread. It is doubtful whether sometimes, in the cases 
 referred to, it was bread at all, i.e. wheaten. 
 
 The Canon of Toledo strictly enjoins that the loaf used 
 at the Eucharist shall be *' whole and wheaten " (" Integer et 
 nitidus "), while that of Chelsea forbids it to be taken from 
 the stale odds and ends of the priest's larder. 
 
 Mr. Warren, in his Liturgy and Ritual of the Celtic 
 Church^ argues that the custom in Ireland was to use un- 
 leavened bread. He quotes DoUinger, who gathered that 
 the Celtic Church differed from the rest of Christendom, 
 from an old Irish Canon which says : " Gildas ait : 
 Britones toto mundo contrarii moribus Romanis inimici 
 non solum in Missa sed etiam in tonsura cum Judasis 
 umbrae futurorum servientes. . . ." It is difficult to see 
 how this quotation touches the question of the use or 
 
 ' F. E. Warren, Liturgy and Ritual of the Celtic Church (Oxf. i88l, pp. 
 1 3 1-2). 
 
 2
 
 i8 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 non-use of azymes at all, and it may safely be dismissed 
 as irrelevant. 
 
 Mr. Warren, however, goes on to quote from Walafrid 
 Strabo in support of his contention : 
 
 " Dum de huiusmodi colloquium rebus haberent, super- 
 veniens Joannes diaconus secundum consuetudinem obtulit 
 ei panes azymos et lagunculam vini." ^ 
 
 But if he had continued the quotation a little further 
 he would have made it clear that these azymes had 
 nothing at all to do with the Eucharist. The extract in 
 full runs : 
 
 *' Dum de huiusmodi colloquium rebus haberent, super- 
 veniens Joannes diaconus secundum consuetudinem obtulit 
 ei panes azymos et lagunculam vini, oleum et butirum et 
 mel in vasculis cum piscibus assis. Vir Dei cum eum venire 
 cognovisset gratias agit Deo gaudio plenus, discubueruntque 
 tres convivae fidissimi et cum gratiarum actione dona Domini 
 perceperunt." 
 
 The quotation in full places it beyond doubt that the 
 " panes azymos " have nothing whatever to do with the 
 Eucharist, but were part of the regular food of the saint. 
 
 It may, perhaps, be convenient here to draw attention 
 to the idea of the " one loaf," even as late as the time of 
 the Gregorian Sacramentary. On the Feast of St. Felix in 
 that Sacramentary, in the prayer " ad complendum," allusion 
 is made to the one loaf of Communion in the words, 
 '' Spiritum tuum nobis Domine tuas charitatis infunde, ut 
 quos uno pane cselesti satiasti," etc. 
 
 The first probable mention of the use of unleavened 
 bread in the Eucharist is made by the great English scholar 
 Alcuin. He says [Epist. Ixix. ad Fratres Lugdunenses) : 
 " Audivimus quoque aliquos in illis partibus adfirmare 
 salem esse in sacrificium Corporis Christi mittendum, 
 
 ' Wftlafridus Strabo, Vita S. Gallic i. 17.
 
 The Uses before the Schism of East and West 19 
 
 Quam consuetudinem nee universalis observat Ecclesia nee 
 Romana custodit auctoritas ... sic et panis qui in 
 Corpus Christi consecratur absque fermento ullius alterius 
 infectionis debet esse mundissimus. . . ." 
 
 Even here it is not certain that Alcuin means that the 
 bread should be unleavened. But he clearly shows that 
 leavened bread was very commonly in use in his days. 
 
 Soon after the time of Alcuin, Paschasius Radbertus 
 (844) wrote in support of the new doctrine of transub- 
 stantiation a work de Corpore et Sanguine Domini. Perhaps 
 he was familiar with the use of unleavened bread, though 
 it is not at all certain. 
 
 He says (xx. 3) : " Haec est namque vera et nova 
 conspersio sinceritatis et veritatis ut simus azymi sine 
 fermento malitiae et nequitiae. Nam in calice nihil aliud 
 bibimus quam Christi sanguinem, ubi et nos per aquam 
 admisti couniti sumus : in pane vero nihil praster corpus 
 ubi nos per Christi conspersionem iam membra sumus , . . 
 Hasc igitur conspersio de multis granis facit unum Corpus, 
 corpus inquam sinceritatis et veritatis si tamen sumus 
 azymi id est absque fermento malitise et nequitia?." 
 
 His language recalls that of St. Cyprian, but it is not 
 unlikely that Paschasius has in mind the use of unleavened 
 bread in the Eucharist. 
 
 The great adversary of Paschasius, Rhabanus Maurus, 
 is, however, quite definite in his reply, de Tnstitution6 
 Clericorum. 
 
 I. xxxi. " Nee enim in sacramentis aliud ofterri licet 
 nisi quod Dominus ipse constituit et suo exemplo facere 
 nos docuit." 
 
 He then proceeds to quote i Cor. xi. 23-5, and goes on : 
 
 ' The mention of bread with salt in it is probably of ordinary leavened 
 bread. Alcuin seems to mean that already the general Roman custom was 
 to use the unleavened bread.
 
 20 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 " Ergo panem infermentatum et vinum aqua mistum in 
 sacramentum Corporis et Sanguinis Christi sanctificari 
 oportet, quia ipsas res de se Dominum testificari Dominicum 
 evangelium narrat." 
 
 And again : " Quod autem panem sacrificii sine fer- 
 mento esse oporteat testatur liber Leviticus ubi commemo- 
 ratur Dominum per Moysen filiis Israel ita prascepisse, 
 * omnis,' inquit, * oblatio quas ofFertur Domino absque fer- 
 mento fiat, nee quidquam fermenti ac mellis adolebitur in 
 sacrificio Domini ' (Lev. ii. 1 1)." 
 
 Thus, then, by the middle of the ninth century it is 
 clear that unleavened bread had come into use in the 
 West. It may be inferred, from the insistence of Rhabanus 
 Maurus on the propriety of using unleavened, that leavened 
 bread was also in use at the same time. 
 
 In the year 867 the Patriarch of Constantinople, Photius, 
 denounced the Latin Church. He flings at the Latins 
 their observance of the Saturday fast and their prohibition 
 of marriage to priests as unorthodox, but makes no mention 
 of the use of unleavened bread in the Latin Church, 
 which was to become, about a century later, a matter of 
 such bitter controversy between Eastern and Western. 
 
 Commenting on this fact of his making no mention 
 of unleavened bread, Bona says : " Ex quo silentio, si non 
 evidenti saltem probabili consecutione deducitur, azymi 
 panis usum circum annum Christi 860 nondum in Ecclesia 
 latina viguisse " {Rer. Liturg. I. xxiii. iv.). 
 
 It may perhaps be convenient at this point, before we 
 pass on to the great controversy between East and West, 
 to consider the causes which led to the introduction of 
 unleavened bread into general use in the West. 
 
 The real reason seems to have been considerations of 
 convenience. 
 
 We must remember that there was a great difference
 
 *I*HE Uses before the Schism of East and West it 
 
 between the civilisations of East and West. In the West 
 many regions were almost barbarous and we can 
 understand how very difficult it must have been to be sure 
 of getting a supply of fine, pure, wheaten bread/ Of 
 course, leavened bread is much more difficult to keep in 
 anything like a fresh condition than unleavened. Thus 
 we see that the use of unleavened bread, with its better 
 keeping properties, would be a matter of the greatest con- 
 venience. 
 
 In the same way the Councils of Toledo and Chelsea 
 show a common irreverence on the part of the clergy in 
 using any piece of bread for the Sacrament, The best way 
 to obviate such irreverence was to require for sacramental 
 purposes a special bread not in every-day domestic use. 
 
 Again, about this time the process of the hedging of 
 the sanctity of the Sacrament had begun. It was less 
 likely that people should regard the consecrated Sacrament 
 as " mere bread " if the bread used was not common bread. 
 The same process was continued in the introduction of the 
 ablutions after Communion, probably somewhat later. 
 
 In all probability all these three reasons helped to bring 
 about the general use of the wafer-bread in the West. 
 
 It was easy enough to find scriptural grounds for the 
 use when once it had been introduced. It was commonly 
 believed in the West, at least, that it was at a Passover-meal 
 that our Lord had instituted the Blessed Sacrament — there 
 was the authority of our Lord Himself. But probably still 
 more did the commonly quoted text of St. Paul, which 
 seemed so apt to the case, lend itself to the support of the 
 custom — I Cor. v. 7, 8 : " For even Christ our Passover 
 
 ' Even as late as 1773 wheaten bread was a luxury unknown in parts of 
 the Highlands of Scotland. " I also gave each person a bit of wheat bread, 
 which they had never tasted before " (Boswell's Journal of a Tour to the 
 Hebrides, p. 123 (Everyman's Library Ed.)).
 
 22 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 is sacrificed for us : therefore let us keep the feast, not 
 with the old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and 
 wickedness ; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and 
 truth." 
 
 Thus, then, we may conclude that the introduction of 
 this use in the West was based on utility ; a spiritual 
 meaning was soon found for it/ 
 
 ' Many of the ceremonial usages of the Church were based on utihtarian 
 grounds ; it was only in later days that spiritual significations were found for 
 such usages, e.g. the use of lights and the mixing of the chalice.
 
 II 
 
 THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN EAST AND 
 
 WEST 
 
 We have seen that, towards the end of the ninth centur)^, 
 the use of unleavened bread had become more or Jess 
 general throughout the West. In the eleventh century 
 it became a matter of bitter controversy between East and 
 West. The relations of the two great divisions of the 
 Church represented by Rome and Constantinople had been 
 very strained for some time past, and the jealousies which 
 led to the final rupture in the time of Michael Caerularius, 
 Patriarch of Constantinople (1043-59) unhappily found too 
 easily pretexts and excuses for schism. 
 
 Photius had, in 867, objected to certain practices in the 
 Roman Church. Michael insisted on these objections once 
 more and added to the list the Western use of unleavened 
 bread, which it is of importance to note that Photius had not 
 mentioned. 
 
 The controversy began in a letter ^ from Michael and 
 Leo the Bulgarian, Archbishop of Achrida, to John, Bishop 
 of Trani, in Apulia, a district over which the Constanti- 
 nopolitan patriarchs had had, and still claimed, jurisdiction. 
 In this letter John of Trani is warned against the errors of 
 the Latins, especially against the use of unleavened bread and 
 the observance of the Sabbath, both of which were condemned 
 as Judaising. 
 
 ' This letter is extant only in a Latin translation. 
 23
 
 •/4 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 The Greeks quote St. Matthew's account of the In- 
 stitution, and point out how our Lord said, '* This is My 
 blood of the ISlew Testament," by which He shows that 
 the things belonging to the old dispensation {yeteris 
 testamenti) are thereby done away with. Then they pass 
 on to the significance and derivation of apros- " Vos quidem 
 * panem,' nos dprov dicimus. "Apro? autem interpretatur 
 ' elevatus ' et ' sursum portatus,' ^ a fermento et sale calorem et 
 elevationem habens." Unleavened bread is lifeless. "Azymae 
 autem nil distant a lapide sine anima." They then go on, 
 doubtless, with the great Latin text, i Cor. v. 7, in their 
 mind, to apply this derivation to the Christian Passover : 
 " Nostrum Pascha gaudium et laetitia totum est et extoUit 
 nos ex humo propter gaudium ad ccelum sicut et fermentum 
 propter proprium calorem panem, qui panis omni suavitate 
 plenus est." Finally, the use of unleavened bread was 
 instituted under the Mosaic law, and does not commemorate 
 the death of the Lord, and under the new dispensation is 
 past and done away with. 
 
 This joint letter was answered at great length by Pope 
 Leo IX. I'he Pope begins by setting forth the great 
 importance of preserving the unity of the Church, which 
 is imperilled by such an attitude as that taken up by 
 Michael and Leo of Achrida. He then goes on, full of 
 indignation at the presumption shown by Michael and his 
 ally in daring to criticise the Roman Church : " Tu, carissime 
 nobis et adhuc dicende in Christo Frater, tuque Leo Acri- 
 dane, dicimini apostolicam et Latinam Ecclesiam nova 
 presumptione atque incredibiU audacia, nee auditam nee 
 convictam, damnasse, pro eo maxime quod de azymis 
 
 ' This derivation is doubtful. Dionysius Bar Salibi (t 1171) draws the 
 same distinction between the Syriac words r<Ls«4*.\ ( ^ uprus) and t^TiJ^^ 
 {= u(vfjios), Exposilio IJtnrgzce, p. 26 (Corpus Script. Christ. Orientahum, 
 Paris, 1903).
 
 The Controversy between East and West 25 
 
 commemorationem dominica; passionis celebrare. . . . Ecce 
 iam post mille ac ferme xx a passione Salvatoris nostri 
 annos incipit per vos discere Romana Ecclesia qualiter 
 memoria passionis eiusdem sit recolenda. . . ." 
 
 But the Western point of view was taken up by one 
 who was a much abler man to deal with the question than 
 Leo seems to have been. This was Cardinal Humbert, 
 Bishop of Silva Candida. Humbert's rejoinder to Michael 
 and Leo of Achrida takes the form of a discussion between 
 a Roman and a Constantinopolitan, and is most moderate 
 and reasonable in its tone. 
 
 His chief point is, as against the Greek position, that 
 panis may mean any sort of bread. He quotes in support 
 of this Ps. Ixxviii. 24, 25 : " and gave them food from heaven : 
 so man did eat angels' food" ; Exod. xvi. 16, " This is the 
 bread which the Lord hath given you to eat " — both of 
 Manna. And again, the angels who came to Abraham (Gen. 
 xviii. 6) are said to have eaten " subcinericios panes " (aprov? 
 vTrore^povs, though the latter expression is not used in the 
 passage in question in the LXX). Again, he argues, the 
 expression dpTov rarreLV(ocreco<g is equivalent to azywa. He 
 does not seem to have noticed that in each case that he cites, 
 dpros does not stand alone, but is qualified by some other 
 word. 
 
 Moreover, he points out that, in the New Testament, 
 leaven is always used in a bad sense. 
 
 Then he goes on to give what was probably one of the 
 chief reasons why unleavened bread became general in the 
 W^est, whether he was conscious of it or not, and that is the 
 great convenience of the use of unleavened, and the absence 
 of crumbs — § xxiv. : " Deinde ritum vestrum discere non 
 curamus quia minimam cautelam et maximam negligentiam 
 
 ' Binius, Concilia Genemlia, iii. pt. 2, p. 1097. Leo ended soon after 
 this by anathematising Michael and all who held to him.
 
 26 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 el inesse cognoscimus, dum sanctum panem frangentes 
 et sumentes, hinc inde decidentes micas non curatis — quod 
 etiam solet contingere dum patinas sanctas foliis palmarum 
 et porcorum setis fricatis inhoneste." Then he goes on to 
 charge the Greek clergy with irreverence : " Multi quoque 
 vestrum tarn irreverenter Corpus Christi reponunt ut pyxides 
 inde cumulent et ne decidat aut superfluat manu inculcant. 
 Reliquias quoque oblationis velut communes panes non- 
 nunquam usque ad fastidium sumunt." 
 
 This account which Humbert gives of the irreverence of 
 the Greek clergy may be overdrawn, but we may probably 
 hold, from our knowledge of the general carelessness of the 
 clergy of all times, that it is on the whole not far from the 
 truth. 
 
 Apart from the fact that Humbert gives the probable 
 reason why unleavened bread became general in the West, he 
 seems to hint that the use of a bread which was unfamiliar 
 in daily domestic use is more likely to keep in the mind of 
 priest and people the sanctity of the Blessed Sacrament and 
 to obviate its being regarded as " communis panis." 
 
 The controversy was maintained on the Greek side by 
 Nicetas Pectoratus, a monk of Studium, who rejoins with 
 much the same arguments as had been previously used, that 
 the use of unleavened is a Judaising custom, that "panis " 
 does not ever mean " azymum," and that, as to the Latin 
 argument from the Institution, that falls to the ground inas- 
 much as the Blessed Sacrament was not instituted as a 
 Passover-meal at all. Cardinal Humbert, in his next con- 
 tribution to the controversy, abandons his moderate tone and 
 descends to violent and coarse abuse of the Greeks. 
 
 ' He also, quite rightly, points out that the nth Canon of the Trullan 
 Council (which forbids any clergyman or layman to eat any Jewish Passover- 
 cakes) has nothing to do with the matter in question. This Canon had been 
 quoted against the Latins.
 
 The Controversy between East and West 27 
 
 Dominicus, Patriarch of Grado, also writes on the sub- 
 ject to Peter, Patriarch of Antioch. His tone is moderate 
 and his chief desire is to preserve the unity of the Catholic 
 Church. He pleads that each part of the Church should 
 retain its own use. Each party gives a special significance to 
 its own use, the Greeks seeing, in the " fermenti et farinae 
 commistio," the " Incarnati Verbi substantia " ; while, on 
 the other hand, the Latins see signified in their unleavened 
 bread the purity of the human nature of our Lord : 
 " quam placuit Divinitati Sibi unire citra controversiam." 
 Dominicus also claims immemorial custom for the Western 
 use. This use, he says, " non solum apostolica sed etiam 
 ipsam et Domini traditione retinemus." This means, of 
 course, that the Western use is in conformity with that of 
 our Lord at the Institution. The weak point of the Latin 
 position in the controversy was that they could not claim an 
 unbroken use, but had to go back to the Institution in de- 
 fence of this practice. 
 
 Yet the position of Dominicus is most moderate and 
 reasonable. 
 
 Peter of Antioch also answers moderately enough. He 
 begins by having a thrust at Dominicus for calling himself 
 " Patriarch " of Grado. He only knows five patriarchs in the 
 Church, he says. Then, coming to the matter in question, 
 he says that the use of unleavened is at variance with the 
 traditional use of the Catholic Church, and goes on to the 
 now stock argument that ctpros is the word used in the 
 account of the Institution. The use of a^vjxa, which have 
 only to do with the commemoration of the Jewish deliverance 
 from Egypt, is mere Judaising. Also, unfermented bread 
 is not perfect bread. 
 
 He also makes a point of John xiii. i, that the Institution 
 took place, not at the Paschal-meal, but before the Passover. 
 The Easterns seem to have been committed to their position
 
 28 The Bread of the JEucharist 
 
 (in spite of St. Chrysostom) by the exigencies of their 
 controversy. 
 
 So the controversy remained. It was a pretext for 
 justifying the schism more than anything else. The Roman 
 practice may have been an innovation, but the Roman 
 position was moderate and reasonable, and the Western 
 Church never once demanded that the Easterns should con- 
 form with the West in this matter. The Easterns, on the other 
 hand, while they had the ancient tradition of the Church on 
 their side, showed a most narrow and obstinate spirit. The 
 Latin attitude has been throughout that, so long as the matter 
 used in the Sacrament is bread, it is an aZid<^opov whether 
 that bread be leavened or unleavened ; the Greek that the 
 leaven is essential to the right matter, and so to the validity 
 of the Sacrament. 
 
 An effort was made at a Council at Nymphaeum, in 
 Bithynia, in 1233, to settle the question. At this council were 
 representatives from the Latin Church, and a consultation was 
 held to see if any accommodation could be arrived at. 
 
 The Latins complained of the aspersions cast by the 
 Greeks on the Latin Eucharist, who were stated to have 
 gone to the length of washing altars which had been used by 
 Western priests before they were used for the Greek rite,^ 
 and even of compelling folk who came from the Latin 
 jurisdiction to the Greek to abjure the Western Sacraments 
 before admission to Greek Communion. 
 
 The conference came to nothing. The old arguments were 
 used. It was argued out whether the Institution took place 
 at a Paschal-meal or not, the Latins maintaining that it did, 
 the Greeks that it did not. But the conference was useless 
 
 ' Worse things than this seem to have been done. In the anathema of Leo 
 against Michael, Casrularius is there joined with the Eastern Patriarch and 
 others in their condemnation : " Et sacellarius ipse JVIichaelis Constantinus 
 qui latinum sacrificium profanis conculcarit pedibus."
 
 The Controversy between East and West 29 
 
 from the very first. It was maintained, from beginning to 
 end, that the Latin Eucharist in unleavened was invalid. 
 " Vos quaeritis," says the Greek Archbishop of Sumastria, 
 " si Corpus Christi potest confici in azymo. Et respondemus 
 quia hoc est impossibile." An accommodation was come to 
 by the Council of Florence. It adopted the position of St. 
 Thomas Aquinas, which indeed represents the attitude of 
 the Roman Church throughout the whole controversy. The 
 Florentine Council declares : " Item in azymo sive fer- 
 mentato pane triticeo Corpus Domini veraciter confici ; 
 sacerdotes quoque in altera ipsum Domini Corpus conficere, 
 iuxta suse latinae vel orientalis Ecclesiae consuetudinem." ^ 
 The accommodation, however, was never acted upon, owing 
 to the Eastern repudiation of the Council. 
 
 ' Labbe & Cossart, t. xiii, col. 1136,
 
 Ill 
 
 ENGLAND 
 
 In England unleavened bread came into use doubtless at 
 the same time as in the rest of the West. We may take it 
 for granted that, if Alcuin used unleavened, the same use 
 was already known and practised in England. Henceforth, 
 up to the time of the Reformation, the use went on 
 unbroken. 
 
 A few instances, perhaps, may be adduced of references 
 to the Eucharistic bread at this time. 
 
 We find in the Constitutions of William de Bleys (1229), 
 cap. i. : 
 
 Circa species itaque quas ad idem Sacramentum exi- 
 guntur, cura diligentior adhibenda est, ut scilicet oblatas de 
 puro grano frumenti fiant. Ministri ecclesia^ induti super- 
 pelliceis in loco honesto sedeant quando oblatas faciunt. 
 Instrumentum in quo oblatce coquendae sunt cera tantum 
 liniatur, non oleo vel alio sagimento : oblatas honestum 
 candorem et decentem rotunditatem habentes supra mensam 
 altaris offerantur. 
 
 It is to be noticed that the round form of the oblatae, 
 which the Council of Toledo recognises, is still retained 
 in the unleavened bread. 
 
 The significance of this shape is explained by Durandus 
 {Rat. iv. 61): "Per modum denarii formatur tum quia 
 Panis vitae pro denariis traditus est tum quia idem denarius 
 
 30
 
 England 31 
 
 in vinea laborantibus in prasmium dandus est." Durandus 
 is here following Honorius of Aulun {^fl. 1 130). 
 
 Probably before unleavened bread came into use it was 
 customary to use bread in a round form, and unleavened 
 bread naturally kept to the traditional shape. The explana- 
 tion of Durandus is doubtless an attempt to explain a use 
 the origin of which was lost. 
 
 It is perhaps to be noticed that there is no mention here 
 of any imprint on the wafers. 
 
 In a Synod held at Exeter in 1287 under Peter Quivil it 
 is ordered (cap. iv.) : 
 
 '* Provideant igitur sacerdotes quod oblatas habeant 
 confectas de simila frumenti et aqua dumtaxat ; ita quod 
 nihil immisceatur fermenti ; sint et oblatas integras Can- 
 didas et rotundas : nee per tantum tempus custodiantur 
 quod in sapore vel aspectu abominabiles habeantur." 
 
 Again, in the Constitutiones Synodales Sodorenses (1350) 
 it is ordered (cap. ii.) : 
 
 '* Hostia de frumento sit, rotunda et integra et sine 
 macula, quia agnus extitit sine macula et os non fuit com- 
 minutum ex eo. Unde versus : 
 
 " Candida, triticea, tenuis, non magna, rotunda, 
 Expers fermenti, non mista sit hostia Christi, 
 Inscribatur, aqua non cocta sed igne sit assa." 
 
 Here we find mention made of a device printed upon 
 the Host, which was generally, if not always, the cruci- 
 fixion. 
 
 These three references are sufficient to illustrate the 
 English use up to the Reformation. Great care was shown 
 that the wafers should be whole, and as white as possible. 
 
 As to the preparation of the bread, Maskell ^ quotes a 
 rule drawn up by Archbishop Lanfranc for the Order of 
 St. Benedict : " And on the day on which the hosts are to 
 * Ancient Liturgy of the Church of England, pp. 46, 47 «.
 
 32 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 be made, let the secretarius and the brethren who shall 
 assist him wash their hands and faces before they begin, 
 and vest themselves in albs and veil their heads in amices, 
 except that one who is to manage the irons and otherwise 
 to serve them. Let one of them sprinkle the flour with 
 water on a perfectly clean table, and press it firmly with 
 his hands and knead it, and let the brother who holds the 
 irons in which [the wafers] are cooked have his hands 
 covered with gloves. In the meantime, while the hosts are 
 being made and cooked, let the same brethren say the 
 ordinary psalms of the hours and the canonical hours, and 
 from the Psalter in order as much as may be sufficient, if 
 they prefer it." 
 
 This rule is interesting as presenting something of a 
 parallel to the rites accompanying the preparation of the 
 Eucharistic breads among the Nestorians, etc., but there 
 seems to have been no such custom general in the West. 
 In the Constitutions of William de Bleys, quoted above, the 
 ministers who make the bread are ordered to wear 
 surplices. 
 
 No change was made in the communion bread until 
 the First Prayer Book of Edward VI. was issued in 1549. 
 
 The Order of Communion^ published in 1548, expressly 
 orders that the bread shall be as used heretofore. 
 
 " Note, that the breade that shalbe consecrated shalbe 
 such as heretofore hath bene accustomed, and euery of the 
 sayd consecrated breades shalbe broken in twoo peces at the 
 least, or more, by the discretion of the ministre, and so 
 distributed. . . ." (First note at end of the " Order.") 
 
 In the First Prayer Book (1549) a change is made, 
 though the bread is still to be unleavened. The Third 
 Rubric at the end of the Mass gives the following 
 directions : 
 
 " For aduoyding of all matters and occasyon of
 
 England 33 
 
 dyscencyon, it is mete that the breade prepared for the 
 Communion, bee made, through all thys realme, after one 
 sort and fashion, that is to say, unleauened, and rounde, 
 as it was afore, but without all maner of printe, and 
 somethyng more larger and thicker than it was, so that it 
 maybe aptly deuided into diuers pieces : and euery one 
 shall be deuided in two pieces at the leaste, or more, by 
 the discrecion of the minister, and so distributed." 
 
 So the first change is made. The wafer is to be plain 
 and larger and thicker than before. 
 
 The Second Prayer Book of King Edward in 1552 makes 
 a great change : 
 
 " And to take away the supersticion whiche any person 
 hathe, or myghte haue in the bread and wyne, it shall 
 suffyse that the bread bee suche as is usuall to bee eaten at 
 the Table wyth other meates, but the best and purest wheate 
 bread that conueniently maye be gotten " (Fourth Rubric 
 after the Communion). 
 
 Here an alternative use is for the first time provided 
 and allowed. It is permitted to the priest to use leavened 
 bread if he choose instead of the wafer, so that it be bread — • 
 that is to say, wheaten, and the purest procurable. 
 
 The Second Book, however, was no sooner issued than 
 the King died, and the book was dropped before it came into 
 anything like general use. 
 
 Elizabeth, after the Marian reaction, issued, as is well 
 known, an improved edition of the Second Prayer Book 
 which had so short an existence. 
 
 In Elizabeth's book, which was issued in 1559, the 
 rubric on the communion bread stands word for word the 
 same as in the Second Prayer Book of King Edward, thus 
 leaving the clergy free to use leavened bread if they choose 
 in place of the wafer. 
 
 This, however, was not the end of the matter. 
 3
 
 34 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 In the Injunctions issued by the Queen in 1559, it is 
 ordered : 
 
 " Where also it was in the time of King Edward the sixth 
 used to have the Sacramental bread of common fine bread, it 
 is ordered for the more reverence to be given to these holy 
 mysteries, being the Sacrament of the body and blood of our 
 Saviour Jesus Christ, that the said Sacramental bread be 
 made and formed plain, without any figure thereupon, of 
 the same fineness and fashion round, though somewhat 
 bigger in compass and thickness, as the usual bread and 
 water, heretofore named singing Cakes, which served for the 
 use of the Private Mass." ^ 
 
 " Item, that the communion bread be thicker and 
 broader than is now commonly used." " 
 
 Here is the rubric of the First Prayer Book of King 
 Edward reissued in a slightly different form. Also this 
 injunction gives us the information that leavened bread 
 was in use in King Edward's time." Since the Second 
 Prayer Book was never in general use, this means that 
 leavened bread was in use in places at least under the First 
 Prayer Book and in defiance of the rubric of that book. 
 
 Also it would seem that Elizabeth had not noticed 
 that the rubric of the Second Book was repeated in her own, 
 for the Injunctions were issued soon after her book appeared. 
 
 This Injunction that the Archbishop and Bishops tried 
 their best to enforce caused much trouble, as the Zurich 
 Letters show. George Withers writes to the Elector 
 
 * Injunctions given by the Queen^s Majesty^ p. 13. London, mdlix. 
 
 2 The Interpretations of the Bishops,^. 2,'2. Alcuin Club Tract. Longmans, 
 1908. 
 
 2 Bishop Horn, writing to Henry Buliinger, and describing the order of 
 administration of Common Prayer and the Sacraments in the time 
 of Edward VL, says : " The bread which is used at the Lord's Supper is of 
 the usual kind, but the purest that may be gotten " {Zurich Letters, 2nd 
 series, app. ii, p. 355). His description of the order shows that he is 
 speaking of Edward's Second Book.
 
 iLNGLAND 35 
 
 Palatine, Frederick III., apparently just after the publication 
 of the Injunction : 
 
 " Ccerimonice vero, quae prima reformatione Edwardi 
 (quemadmodum prius dictum est) relictae in ecclesia sunt, 
 sub eodem nomine restituuntur. Reginae praeterea et 
 Archiepiscopo superinducendi quas velint casrimonias 
 potestas data est,^ qui statim postea et panem communem 
 prius ad celebrandam coenam constitutum aboluerunt, et 
 novioris renovationis causa placentulam rotundam, ad 
 formam eius qua papistae utebantur, instituerunt." ' 
 
 In 1560, Peter Martyr answers the queries of Thomas 
 Sampson on the subject : " De pane infermentato qui 
 adhibetur coenae sacrae, tu ipse nosti omnes Ecclesias nostras 
 non litigare, imo omnes passim uti." ^ To the same effect 
 Peter Martyr had answered Grindal's doubts when Bishop- 
 Elect of London in 1559.^ 
 
 An attempt was made over a period of some years to 
 enforce the use of wafer bread. Thus we find in Parker's 
 Visitation Articles of 1563 : 
 
 " Item, whether they do use to minister the Communion 
 in wafer bread according to the Quene's maiestie's Iniunc- 
 tions, or in common bread ."^ " 
 
 This article is repeated in the articles to be inquired of 
 in the Diocese of Norwich at the Metropolitan Visitation 
 of Matthew Parker in 1567. 
 
 But there was much opposition. Miles Coverdale, 
 Lawrence Humphry, and Thomas Sampson, writing to 
 
 ' " And also, tliat if there shall happen any contempt or irreverence to be 
 used in the Ceremonies or Rites of the Church by the misusing of tlie orders 
 appointed in this book, the Queen's Majesty may, by the like advice of the 
 said Commissioners or Metropolitan, ordain and publish such further Cere- 
 monies or Rites as may be most for the advancement of God's glory, the 
 edifying of his Church, and the due reverence of Christ's holy mysteries and 
 Sacraments" (Act of Uniformity, anno 1° Eliz., sub fine). 
 
 * Zunch Letters, 2nd series, p. 95. ^ Ibid., p. 24. 
 
 * Strype, Life of Grhidal, p. 46. Oxford, 1822.
 
 36 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 William Farrell, say (in 1566): "Res nostras non in 
 melius commutatae, sed, proh dolor ! in deterius prolapsae 
 sunt. Hasc enim acta et transacta sunt, ut loco panis 
 vulgaris placentula azyma habeatur." 
 
 The difficulties which the Bishops had to encounter were 
 seen in the attitude of some puritan nonconformists who 
 were brought before Bishop Grindal in 1567, and with 
 whom the Bishop argued some of the points of difference. 
 
 Strype says {Life of Grindal, p. 173): "The Bishops 
 knowing the reverence they had for the Church of Geneva, 
 shewed how they communicated in wafer-cakes, one of the 
 things used then in the administration of the Sacrament, and 
 which they were much against. One said they of Geneva 
 did not compel so to receive. The Bishop said * Yes, in 
 their parish churches.' But another of their party put that 
 off by saying that the English congregation there did 
 minister with loaf-bread. And another said that it was 
 best lo follow the best example, and that they were to follow 
 that Church of Geneva as that followed Christ." 
 
 A letter written by Archbishop Parker to Sir William 
 Cecil, in January I57y> gives us a pretty clear view of 
 the state of things. 1 mve it in full from Parker's 
 Correspondence} 
 
 « Sir, 
 
 "Whereupon upon the return of My Lord of London 
 (Edwin Sandys) from the court, we had communication of 
 the Communion bread, and he, seeming to signify to me 
 that your Honour did not know of any rule passed by law 
 in the Communion book that it may be such bread ' as is 
 usually eaten at the table with other meats,' &c., I thought 
 it good to put you in remembrance, and to move your 
 consideration in the same. For it is a matter of much 
 ' Correspondence, p. 376, Parker Society.
 
 England 37 
 
 contention in the realm : where most part of protestants 
 think it most meet to be in wafer bread, as the injunction 
 prescribeth ; divers others, I cannot tell of what spirit, would 
 have the loaf bread, &c. And hereupon one time at a 
 sessions would one Master Fogg have indicted a priest for 
 using wafer bread, and one indirectly for charging the wafer 
 bread by injunction : where the judges were Mr. Southcoots 
 and Mr. Gerrard, who were greatly astonied upon the 
 exhibiting of the book. And I being then in the country, 
 they counselled with me, and I made reasons to have the 
 injunction prevail. First, I said, as her Highness talked 
 with me once or twice on that point, and signified that there 
 was one proviso in the Act of the Uniformity of Common 
 Prayer that by law is granted unto her, that * if there be any 
 contempt or irreverence used in the ceremonies or rites of 
 the Church by the misusing of the orders appointed in the 
 book, the queen's Majesty may, by the advice of her com- 
 missioners, or metropolitan, ordain or publish such further 
 ceremonies or rites, as may be most for the reverence of 
 Christ's holy mysteries and sacraments,' and but for which 
 law her Highness would not have agreed to divers orders of 
 the book. And by. virtue of which law she published 
 further order in her injunctions, both for the Communion 
 bread and for the placing of the tables within the quire. 
 They that like not the injunctions force much the statute 
 in the book. I tell them that they do evil to make odious 
 comparison betwixt statute and injunction, and yet I say and 
 hold that the injunction hath authority by proviso of the 
 statute. And whereas it is said in the rule,' that ' to take 
 away the superstition which any person hath or might have 
 in the bread and wine, it shall suffice that the bread is such 
 as is usually eaten at the table with other meats, &c.' ; * it 
 shall suffice,' I expound, where either there wanteth such 
 • I.e. the rubric in the Prayer Book.
 
 ^8 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 fine usual bread, or superstition be feared in the wafer bread, 
 they may have the Communion in fine usual bread, which is 
 rather a toleration in these two necessities than is in plain 
 ordering, as in the injunction. 
 
 " This 1 say to shew you the ground which hath moved 
 me and others to have it in the wafer bread ; a matter not 
 greatly material, but only obeying the queen's Highness, 
 and for that the most part of her subjects disliketh the 
 common bread for the sacrament. And therefore as her 
 Highness and you shall determine, I can soon alter my order, 
 although now quietly received in my diocese, and I think 
 would breed some variance to alter it. I hear also that in 
 the court you be come to use the usual bread. Sir, the great 
 disquiet babbling that the realm is in in this matter maketh 
 me thus long to babble, and would be loth that now your 
 saying and judgement should so be taken as ye saw a law that 
 should prejudice the injunction." 
 
 This important letter gives us a general idea of the 
 prevalence of the use of wafer-bread in 1570. For ten years 
 now the Archbishop had been insisting on the injunction, 
 and apparently with great success. The wafer-bread was 
 now " quietly received in my diocese," and Parker says that 
 " the most part of her subjects disliketh the common bread 
 for the sacrament." The greatest proof of the wide pre- 
 valence of the wafer-bread is shown by the fact that two 
 judges did not even know of the rubric, and were astonished 
 when Parker told them of it. 
 
 On the other hand, the strenuous minority of Puritans 
 insisted on the force of the rubric, though Parker says plainly 
 that he regards the injunction as " further order," and as 
 having authority under the Act of Uniformity. But the 
 latter part of the letter shows that Cecil is now favouring the 
 Puritans in this question. Ordinary bread is now in use
 
 England 39 
 
 even in the Queen's chapel, and Parker evidently fears that 
 Cecil is taking the line that the injunction has no force as 
 against the rubric. 
 
 Whether Parker had been too optimistic in his views 
 as expressed in this letter, or, as is more likely, the 
 growth in power of the Puritan party, encouraged and 
 supported by influential persons at Court, had undone the 
 Archbishop's work, he writes in a very different strain to 
 Parkhurst, Bishop of Norwich, on June 14, 1574: "And 
 as for their contention of wafer bread and loaf-bread, if the 
 order you have taken will not sufl'ice them, they may fortune 
 hereafter to wish they had been more conformable, although 
 I trust that you mean not universally in your diocese to 
 command or wink at the loaf-bread, but for peace and quiet- 
 ness here and there to be contented therewith." ^ 
 
 Evidently in the Norwich Diocese the use of wafer-bread 
 is the exception. Parker's suffragans were not loyal, and the 
 Archbishop evidently more than suspects the Bishop of 
 Norwich of being lukewarm in the cause. 
 
 Henceforward we hear but little of the subject. Other 
 questions of a more important nature, such as kneeling at 
 the Communion, and the general government of the Church, 
 excluded a controversy on what was, after all, as Parker says 
 in his letter to Cecil, "a matter not greatly material." 
 
 Thus in the later Visitation Articles we do not find this 
 inquiry as to wafer-bread. 
 
 The rubric was repeated in the Prayer Book under 
 James I., but the use of wafer-bread had not by any means 
 died out. It was only the Great Rebellion, ending in fifteen 
 years of Puritan supremacy, that brought the use to an end 
 till it was revived in our own day. 
 
 The Canons of i6o|- order simply " wheaten bread" 
 {pants siligineus) in Canon 20. 
 
 ' Parker's Correspondence, p, 460.
 
 40 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 Archbishop Bancroft's Metropolitan Visitation Articles of 
 1605 simply inquire "whether the churchwardens doe 
 provide against every communion with the advice of the 
 Minister a sufficient quantity of fine Whit Bread. . . ." This 
 is the line taken by all the Visitation Articles which touch the 
 matter henceforward. There is no mention of the wafer- 
 bread, but only an insistence of " fine whit bread " or " fine 
 white bread." " Whit " is white, or v/heaten, in contradis- 
 tinction to loaves of other meal in oreneral domestic use. 
 
 o 
 
 But the use of the wafer-bread was still retained by the High 
 Church party, as there is plenty of evidence to show, and 
 apparently in the Chapels Royal. 
 
 For example, at Westminster Abbey there seems to have 
 been an unbroken use of unleavened bread until the Great 
 Rebellion and persecution of the Church at that time made 
 the break in the continuity of church life which saw the end 
 of the cope and the wafer together. Thus, at least on two 
 occasions there was trouble in the Puritan House of Commons 
 on this Westminster use. 
 
 On April 14, 1 614, we learn that It was resolved that 
 the whole House is to receive the Communion not at 
 Westminster Abbey, " for feare of copes and wafer cakes," 
 but at St. Margaret's.^ 
 
 Again, we read it recorded in 1621 : '* Note that the 
 Speaker of the Commons acquainted the House that the 
 Dean and Chapter of Westminster refuse to permit them to 
 receive Communion there because they were not first asked, 
 and because the preacher was not one of themselves, but 
 that if they would appoint a Canon preacher they might 
 receive the Communion with ordinary bread ; and that the 
 House of Commons rejected the offer and chose the Temple 
 Church." 2 
 
 ' A letter from Chamberlain to Carleton, State Papers, Domestic, Ixxvii. 7. 
 ^ Feb, 16, 162 1 (State Papers, Domestic).
 
 England 41 
 
 The use of the Chapels Royal is probably represented by 
 the arrangements made for the worship in Prince Charles's 
 private chapel during his visit to Spain. Among the 
 instructions given to the Prince's chaplains it is directed, 
 " That the Communion be celebrated in due form, with 
 an oblation of every communicant, and admixing Water 
 with the Wine : the Communion to be as often used as 
 it shall please the Prince to set down ; smooth Wafers to 
 be used for the Bread." ^ 
 
 Yet, on the other hand, such decided High Churchmen 
 as John Cosin seem to have been quite content with the 
 ordinary leavened bread. Prynne, in Canterburie s Doome^ 
 where he is describing Cosin's ceremonial at Peterhouse, 
 mentions the knife used for the cutting of the bread for 
 Communion, but does not say anything about any use 
 by Cosin of unleavened bread." It is noticeable, too, that 
 Cosin himself, in his Archidiaconal Visitation of the East 
 Riding of Yorkshire in 1627,^ inquires simply, "Doth 
 he carefully see to the preparation of the Bread and 
 Wine before every Communion, that they be pure and 
 wholesome .^ . . ." 
 
 Prynne has much to say on the ceremonial of Archbishop 
 
 Laud's private chapel in his Canterburie s Doome. There, 
 
 among the list of the Archbishop's ornaments, appears " a 
 
 silver and gilt candlesticke [sic] for wafers." * Thus it is 
 
 evident that the alternative uses of leavened and unleavened 
 
 bread went on side by side,^ and that the use of ordinary 
 
 ' Heylin, Cyprianus Aiiglicus, p. loo. Loiidon, imdclxxi. 
 ^ Nor is there any mention of wafer-bread in Peter Smart's complaints 
 against Cosin's doings at Durham. 
 
 ' Cosin's Correspundencc, vol. i. p. ii8. Surtees Soc, i86S. 
 
 * Page 123. 
 
 * A list of instances of the use of unleavened bread at this time is to 
 be iovind \n Hierurgia Anglicana, part ii. pp. 129-43, ed. by the Very Rev. 
 Vernon Staley (London: Alex. Moring, 1903). It is superfluous, therefore, 
 to give it here.
 
 42 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 bread was by no means confined to the Low Church 
 party. 
 
 After the Great Rebellion the question came up once 
 ^lore at the Savoy Conference. There an attempt was 
 made, but unsuccessfully, to alter the rubric. Thus, in 
 the Prayer Book presented to the Conference by Cosin, 
 the rubric appears in the following shape : " It shall suffice 
 that the bread shall be such as is usuall, yet the best and 
 purest wheat bread that conveniently may be gotten, though 
 wafer bread, pure and without any figure, shall not be 
 forbidden, especially in such churches where it hath bin 
 accustomed. The wine also shalbe of the best and purest 
 that may be had." ^ 
 
 But the attempt to change the rubric was unsuccessful, 
 and the rubric was inserted in a form almost identical with 
 that of the Second Book of Edward VI. : 
 
 " And to take away all occasion of dissension, and super- 
 stition, which any person hath or might have, concerning 
 the Bread and Wine, it shall suffice that the bread is such 
 as is usual to be eaten ; but the best and purest Wheat 
 Bread that conveniently may be gotten." 
 
 The break in church life in the seventeenth century 
 of the fifteen years, 1645-60, during which the Liturgy 
 of the Church of England was not heard in her churches, 
 did away with many old uses, among which may be reckoned 
 the use in some churches of wafer-bread. Apparently it was 
 very little used, if indeed at all, after the Restoration. 
 The best proof of this is to be seen, perhaps, in the fact 
 that wafer- bread was not, like the mixed chalice, one of 
 the vexed questions in the " usages " controversy among 
 the non-jurors who represented the High Church party 
 of Restoration times. 
 
 Since then, till recent times, the Church of England has 
 ' Cosin's Correspondence, vol. ii. p. 62.
 
 England 43 
 
 been content to use ordinary, that is to say leavened, wheat 
 bread. 
 
 Her rubric still, as it stands, regards the use of wafer 
 bread as the normal, while giving a wise permission to those 
 who prefer it to use leavened bread, acting in accordance 
 with the axiom of the Pacificator, " in non necessariis 
 libertas."
 
 IV 
 
 THE EASTERN CHURCHES 
 
 The Eastern Churches, with the exception of the Armenians 
 and the Maronites, have always used leavened bread ; and 
 there can be little doubt that the same use obtained among 
 the Armenians before the seventh century, and among the 
 Maronites before their union with Rome in the twelfth 
 century. 
 
 In the following pages an account is given of the use 
 of all the Eastern communities : of the Orthodox Churches 
 (including Russia), of the Coptic Church, the Abyssinian 
 Church, the East Syrian Church (commonly known as 
 " Nestorians "), the Syrian Orthodox Church (commonly 
 known as "Jacobites"), the Armenian Church, and the 
 Maronites. 
 
 I^he Order for the Renewal of the Holy Leaven among 
 the East Syrians, and the Form for the preparation of the 
 Eiicharistic Bread among the West Syrians are here given 
 for the first time, so fir as I am aware, in English. It 
 is the general custom, throughout the Eastern Churches, 
 to administer both the species of the Holy Sacrament 
 together, by dipping the species of bread into the species 
 of wine, and then placing the Sacrament in the mouth of 
 the communicant. Sometimes a spoon is used for the 
 purpose, as in the Greek, Russian, West Syrian, Coptic 
 (sometimes), and Abyssinian Churches. In the Coptic 
 Church a spoon is not always used. Among the Armenians 
 
 44
 
 GREE ORTIIOD X 
 
 EUCHARISTIC BREAD 
 
 EULOGIA (JERUSALEM)
 
 RUSSIAN 
 
 EUCHARISTIC BREAD 
 
 LOAF OFFERED FOR SPECIAL TURPOSES 
 
 Us
 
 The Eastern Churches 45 
 
 a spoon is not used at all, the priest dipping with his fingers 
 a portion of the species of bread into the species of wine. 
 The exception to the Eastern custom is found among the 
 East Syrians, where the two species are administered sepa- 
 rately, as with us. 
 
 It will be remembered that the two species were 
 administered separately in the Liturgy of the Apostolic 
 Constitutions^ and in the time of St. Cyril of Jerusalem, 
 They were so administered separately among the West 
 Syrians in the time of Narsai ^ (f c. 502). 
 
 The Orthodox Church 
 
 The bread used in the Greek Church consists of a 
 round leavened cake 5 in. by 2 in. It is stamped with 
 a square which is itself divided by a cross into four squares 
 in which are printed IC, XC, Nl, KA, i.e. 'l7]aov<; Xptcrro? vi.Ka 
 (Jesus Christ conquers). The square is ceremonially 
 detached and placed on the paten, and is called " The 
 Lamb." No rites are used in connection with the making 
 of the bread." 
 
 In the Russian Church the bread is formed of two 
 pieces, typical of the twofold nature of Christ. The upper 
 part of the loaf is smaller than the lower part, and the 
 top is stamped with the impression of a cross and the 
 inscription IHC XC Nl KA. 
 
 In the Greek Church only one loaf is used. In the 
 Russian, though one loaf only may be used, it is the general 
 custom to use five, in remembrance of the miraculous 
 
 ' R. H. Connolly, Homilies of Narsai, p. 60 (Camb. Univ. Press, 1909). 
 
 ^ There are other loaves used in connection with the Eucharist, but not 
 for the Eucharist, which must not be confused with the Eucharistic breads. 
 For example, small loaves, stamped with a representation of the Risen Lord, 
 are at Jerusalem blessed during the Liturgy, and afterwards distributed 
 among pilgrims. Loaves of much the same kind are also used for the 
 " Artoklasia."
 
 46 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 feeding of the multitude with the five loaves. The Blessed 
 Sacrament is administered in both species together by means 
 of a spoon. The loaf used as the priest's bread is always 
 one stamped with the squares, other loaves, which may be 
 offered by the people, having the figure of a saint impressed 
 on them. The loaf in the illustration is one so offered, 
 and has a legend written round it in ink, " Offered for the 
 Nun Nina." From such loaves offered by individuals 
 a small particle is taken and placed among the other 
 commemorative particles, which are not used for communi- 
 cating, but are put in the chalice and consumed by the 
 deacon at the end of Mass. 
 
 The Copts 
 
 The Eucharistic bread among the Copts is a round 
 leavened cake four inches across by three-quarters of an inch 
 thick. It is stamped with a cross consisting of twelve little 
 squares, and round the edge runs the inscription in Greek : 
 "Ayio? 6 ^eo? ctyiog laxvpo<; aytog aBdvaTos (Holy God, 
 holy mighty, holy immortal). The inscription sometimes 
 varies slightly. There are also sometimes five small holes 
 in the cake, representing the five wounds of our Lord. 
 The twelve squares are held to represent the twelve 
 Apostles. 
 
 Among the Jacobites and Nestorians, and in the 
 Orthodox Church, oil and salt are used in the making of 
 the bread, but neither is used by the Copts, between whom 
 and the Syrian Jacobites there was a bitter controversy on the 
 matter in the eleventh century. 
 
 The bread is made within the precincts of the church by 
 the doorkeeper, or sacristan, who is specially appointed for 
 that purpose. 
 
 In the celebration the four central squares, called the
 
 COPTIC EUCHARISTIC LOAF 
 
 46]
 
 THE MAUNDY THURSDAY EULOGIA (COPTU) 
 
 [47
 
 The Eastern Churches 47 
 
 Asbadikon ( = SecrTroTLKov, sc. croi/Aa) is broken off at the 
 fraction and used for the commixture. 
 
 The Communion is given in both species at once, the 
 Consecrated Bread being slightly dipped in the chalice and 
 placed in the communicant's mouth, sometimes by means of 
 a spoon (koklidrion). 
 
 The bread in the form of a cross is not strictly Eucharistic 
 bread, but is the Eulogia distributed to the worshippers on 
 Maundy Thursday. 
 
 The Abyssinians 
 
 The bread used among the Abyssinians is a round, flat, 
 leavened cake, four inches across by three-quarters of an 
 inch thick. It is stamped with a cross of nine squares, with 
 four squares added in the angles of the cross. 
 
 Ludolf^ makes the statement, which has been quoted 
 from him by Le Brun, that on Maundy Thursday the 
 Abyssinians use unleavened bread, as in the Eucharist. It 
 is noticeable, however, that Jerome Lobo, one of the 
 Portuguese Jesuit missionaries to Abyssinia, though he goes 
 into the uses of the Abyssinians, and mentions their use of 
 leavened bread in common with the rest of Eastern 
 Christendom, makes no reference to this alleged Maundy 
 Thursday use. 
 
 On the other hand, it is possible that Ludolf, or his 
 informant, may have based this statement on the form of 
 the words of Institution which occurs in the Ethiopic 
 Liturgy of St. Epiphanius." It is as follows : 
 
 " In that night, the evening of Thursday to the dawning 
 of Friday, when He had sat down in the house of Lazarus, 
 
 ' Comment, ad sua7n Hist., \>. 5, n. 28. Le Brun, who willingly follows 
 him here, elsewhere derides him as utterly untrustworthy, 
 » B.M., Or. 545, fol. 91 ^, col. I.
 
 48 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 His friend, He took bread of wheat, unfermented, of that 
 which they had brought to Him for the supper. . . ." 
 
 Failing further evidence than Ludolf's assertion, we may 
 naturally hesitate to accept any such alleged use as an 
 undoubted fact. 
 
 The Orthodox Syrian Church 
 (Syrian Jacobites) 
 
 The Syrian " Jacobite " Eucharistic bread consists of a 
 leavened cake two and three-quarter inches in diameter by 
 three-quarters of an inch thick. It is shaped like a wheel 
 with four diameters, the alternate radii being cut off half- 
 way from the circumference by a concentric circle. 
 
 Among the " Jacobites " Holy Leaven is used, but this 
 is not to be confused with the Holy Leaven of the 
 Nestorians. At each making of dough for the bread a 
 small piece is set aside and mixed with the next making of 
 dough, and so the continuity of the Eucharist is emphasised 
 by the unity of the bread used. This piece of dough set 
 aside for mixing with the next making is called the " Holy 
 Leaven." This practice is also followed among the 
 Nestorians, but the Holy Leaven with them is additional, 
 and quite distinct from this,^ 
 
 Salt and oil are among the ingredients, though it is now 
 asserted that the oil is simply used on the priest's hands to 
 prevent the dough sticking to them. But a special signifi- 
 cance was given to each of these ingredients in olden times. 
 Thus John Bar-Susan, "Jacobite" Patriarch from 1064 to 
 1073, in his controversy with the Armenian Patriarch of his 
 day, explains that, as Adam was formed of water, air, fire, 
 
 ' There is no mention of this Jacobite practice by Dionysius Bar-Salibi, 
 who flourished in the twelfth century, and who wrote an important Expositio 
 LiturgicE. Even Assemani, B.O., ii. Dissertatio de Monophysitis, v., does not 
 mention this practice.
 
 AKVSSINIAX EUCHARISTIC IJREAH 
 
 48]
 
 WEST SYRIAN JACOKITR I.OAl'
 
 The Eastern Churches 49 
 
 and earth, which, with the spirit, make five ingredients, 
 so there is a special meaning in the five ingredients used 
 in making the Eucharistic Bread. So the water used 
 signifies the water used in the creation of Adam, the flour 
 signifies the earth, the salt the fire, the leaven the air, and 
 the oil signifies the spirit.^ 
 
 There is also an ancient rule among the Syrian Jacobites 
 that, if more than two loaves be used in the celebration of 
 the Eucharist, the number shall be odd." Dionysius is also 
 very insistent on the cooking of the bread on the day on 
 which it is to be used, and claims Apostolic authority for 
 this practice. As, however, has been remarked, this practice 
 of baking the bread on the day on which it is to be used is 
 common to the whole Eastern Church, with the exception of 
 the Maronites. 
 
 The following is the form with which the Eucharistic 
 bread is prepared.^ 
 
 In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the 
 Holy Ghost, one true God. 
 
 Verses to be said over the Dough [used for~\ the Kur- 
 bana. 
 
 To the chant " The P otter T 
 
 After the "Our Father," and Ps. 51, "Have mercy 
 upon me." 
 
 " I am the Bread of Life, said Our Lord, which from the 
 height came down to the depth. Food Eternal. The 
 Father sent me, the Word that was not flesh, and as an 
 
 ' Ter-Minassiantz, Die Armenische Kirche, p. 99 and pp. 102-3 i '^f- 
 Dionysius Bar-Salibi, Expos. Lit., p. 27 (Labourt Ed., Paris, 1903). 
 
 ^ Dionysius Bar-Salibi, Expos. Lit., p. 24. 
 
 ' I am indebted for this form to the Rev. W. A. Wigram, liead of the 
 Assyrian Mission, who most kindly procured it for me from Rahib Ephraim 
 Bar-Soma, Secretary to his Holiness the Patriarch of the Orthodox Syrian 
 Church, more familiar to us under the name of the "Jacobite" Church. 
 
 4
 
 50 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 husbandman Gabriel sowed me, and the womb of Mary 
 received me as good ground. And lo ! through them 
 priests carry me upon the altar after the type of the 
 Angels." 
 
 " On the speaking spheres of fire and spirit. So there 
 is carried that body which Our Lord received from us : and 
 Him the numberless Cherubim bless : and to Him the 
 Seraphim chant ' Holy ' with their wings : and cry to Him 
 ' Holy, holy, holy art Thou, O Lord. The Heavens are 
 full of Thee, and the Earth of Thy glory : blessed art Thou 
 for ever.' " 
 
 *' Let him that hath not received the seal depart, 
 crieth the Church. And ye, the sons of Baptism, come, 
 enter into the sanctuary. Woe to the soul who wanders 
 in the streets at the time when the Mysteries are being 
 celebrated : the table of life is ready, and the Bread of Life 
 upon it, and the cup which is mixed from the side of the 
 Lord unto forgiveness of sins." 
 
 " O sinner, wherefore goest thou forth from the holy 
 place at the time when thy Lord is sacrificed upon the 
 altar ^ Instead of making petition to Him because of thy 
 sinfulness, lo, thou goest forch on a vain pretext. Remain, 
 O man ; pray for mercies from God, and cry unto Him, 
 ' Holy, holy, holy art Thou, O God in Heaven and on 
 earth.' " 
 
 The Armenians 
 
 The Eastern Churches have always adhered to the 
 use of leavened bread, and claimed that such is the primitive 
 and original practice of the Church, with the exception of 
 the Armenians ; and all, except the Maronites, insist on 
 bread being newly made for the Eucharist. The Maronites 
 use the Latin unleavened wafer. The Armenian Chu*'ch 
 stands alone among the Eastern communities in using
 
 The Eastern Churches 51 
 
 unleavened bread. The origin of this use is difficult to 
 arrive at. It is not due to the Western influence to which 
 the Armenians were subjected in the twelfth century, for it 
 existed long before that date. 
 
 The Armenian Church observes another use in con- 
 nection with the Eucharist which is unique in East and 
 West, and that is the practice of using an unmixed cup. 
 But the two peculiarities do not seem to be connected, for 
 the use of the unmixed cup seems to have been very early, 
 and, at any rate, considerably anterior to the introduction of 
 unleavened bread. 
 
 The first hint we get of anything peculiar in the 
 Armenian method of celebrating the Eucharist is in con- 
 nection with their use of an unmixed cup. This is 
 referred to and reprobated in Canon XXXII. of the Trullan 
 Council of 684 ; but it is to be noticed that, while this 
 Canon condemns the unmixed cup, it does not even mention 
 any use of unleavened bread— a fact that certainly argues 
 that such a use, if in vogue at all, was certainly not the 
 general and official use of the Armenian Church. 
 
 From this date we find but few references to Armenia 
 in Greek writers, partly because the Armenians refused to 
 accept the Council of Chalcedon, and were therefore 
 ecclesiastically cut off from orthodox Eastern Christendom, 
 and partly because Armenia was constantly after this time 
 falling into the hands of the Saracens, and so was politically 
 cut off from the Empire. 
 
 In the eleventh century we find a Greek writer, 
 Philippus Solitarius, writing about Armenia and its customs. 
 He speaks of the use of unleavened bread and the unmixed 
 cup as already an ancient custom among the Armenians, and 
 says that old writers among the Armenians declared that 
 these uses had been handed down as a tradition to the 
 Armenian Church by St. Gregory the Illuminator.
 
 52 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 Philip's own words may perhaps be given. He says 
 {de rebus Armen. vi.) : Kal Tr]v vtt avToiv Trpoo-ayojxeprjv 
 7Tpoo'(f)opav d^vfJiov ttolovq-lv. kol eV rw Trj<; Koivoivia,^ 
 TroTrjpLO) Kara rov'^ laKoy^iTas oivov ixovov ip,/3dk\ovcn kol 
 ov irapaiXLyvvovcri voart . . . koX ol vvv\ ^aTit^dpioL i^ 
 akoyov 77apa8ocreoJ9 ravra XrjpovcrL. ol Se dp)(aloL tovtcjv 
 Ka6r)yr]Tal top ev dyioi^ 0e6(f)opov kol [xdpTvpa Vp-qyopiov 
 ttJs p.eyd\.7]<; 'Ap/tei'ta? aurot? irapaSovpaL rrjp re ^(ji}p\<i 
 l,vixr]<; TTpo(T(f)opdp koI to x^'^P'-^ vSaros TTOTrjpiov Sto, to top 
 dpTOP (fjacrlp CKcipop op 6 Xpto-ro? eV toj pvaTiKM SetTrpo) 
 T069 [xa6y]TaL<; eScoKep d^^vpop elpat koI to TroTTjpiop xojpls 
 vSaTos- 
 
 Philip had evidently been at some trouble to investigate 
 the origin of the Armenian peculiarities. The Armenians 
 of his day seem to have been unable to account for them 
 except by simply stating that this was the custom of their 
 Church, and this attitude is probably what Philip is reflecting 
 on when he speaks of the dXoyo^ TrapdSocns which the 
 Armenians of his day follow. But none the less he has 
 discovered the more ancient claim, made by Armenian 
 writers of two or three centuries before, that these practices 
 were received from Gregory the Illuminator. 
 
 It is worth noticing that, in the Trullan Canon which 
 condemns the Armenian use of the unmixed cup, it is stated 
 that the Armenians of tnat date claimed St. Chrysostom 
 as their authority for the use. Now, though this has no 
 particular bearing on the unmixed cup, it has on the question 
 of unleavened bread, because St. Chrysostom alone, 1 believe, 
 of all Eastern Fathers, did hold that the meal at which the 
 blessed Sacrament was instituted was a Paschal Supper (de 
 prodit. Jud^. i. 5). 
 
 It is also noticeable that, in the controversy betweei) 
 East and West in the eleventh century, neither side adduced 
 the use of the Armenians.
 
 The Eastern Churches 53 
 
 The Greeks, then, seem to have known but very little 
 about the usages of the Armenians. But when we turn 
 to Eastern sources of information we learn more. 
 
 Kalemkiar and Dashian,^ in the introduction to their 
 volume of Liturgies (p. 68, in Armenian) claim that John 
 Mandakuni, Catholicos of Armenia c. 480, witnessed to the 
 use of mixing water with the cup, but his text has been 
 tampered with. He testified, however, neither for nor 
 against the use of unleavened bread. 
 
 The same authors point out that in the fourth century 
 the Armenians almost certainly derived their rites from the 
 Syriac Church of Edessa, and would therefore have used 
 azymcs. But it is necessary first to show that the Edessene 
 Church of that date used azymes, and such evidence is not 
 forthcoming. There is only one passage in Syriac Patristic 
 literature of this date that can be held at all to touch the 
 subject. Aphraates {de Paschate, 8) remarks : " Israel after 
 Passover eats azyme [singular] for seven days until the 
 2 1 St day of the month: we also keep azymes [plural] at 
 the celebration of our Saviour." But even Aphraates (f. 350) 
 is almost certainly not referring to any use of unleavened 
 bread among Christians, but simply to the observance of the 
 Feast of Easter. 
 
 We get nearer to definite dates when we find works 
 ascribed to Jacob of Edessa (f 708) written against the use 
 among the Armenians of the unmixed cup and unleavened 
 bread. 
 
 But we find definite and authoritative information in the 
 Canons of John of Odzun, or Otsun, Catholicos c. 718. 
 In his eighth Canon we read : 
 
 " It is right also to offer unleavened bread and pure 
 
 ' For this and other information as to the Armenians, and especially 
 for the translation of Armenian documents, I am indebted to Mr. F, C. 
 Conybeare,
 
 54 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 wine on the Holy Altar, according to the tradition handed 
 down to us by St. Gregory. And we must not stoop to 
 the traditions of the other races of Christians. For the holy 
 Illuminator carried on this practice from the legal Covenant, 
 and in apostolic wise caused his precept to be carried out 
 by the members of his diocese. In the same way also he 
 prescribes the admixture of the salt of blessing with the 
 animals slain as victims of the Agapes ; and, according to 
 the order of the Levites, he prescribed that the grace of 
 the Church should be reserved in certain chosen families. 
 And we ought to continue the same custom, and not abandon 
 it, nor introduce any innovations." ^ 
 
 Here we have already the definite statement that the 
 use of unleavened bread and the unmixed cup is derived 
 by a tradition from Gregory the Illuminator. I have given 
 the concluding part of this Canon to show that there were 
 also other and curious practices in vogue among the 
 Armenians of a Judaistic nature and which were also ascribed 
 to St. Gregory. 
 
 In the year 727 or 728 a very important national 
 Council was held at Manazkert. It was attended by 
 Armenian and Syrian Bishops, and met with the intention 
 of repudiating the Chalcedonian Council and of reaffirming 
 Monophysitism and promoting a union among the Mono- 
 physite communions.^ 
 
 Heraclius, after his defeat of the Persians and his recovery 
 of the Cross in 628, had made a great effort to promote 
 a general reunion of the divided Eastern Churches, He 
 succeeded in Grecising and reconciling to the orthodox 
 faith Western Armenia, and an orthodox Catholicos, Ezra 
 by name, was appointed by him. Apparently the Chalce- 
 
 ^ The translation is Mr. Conybeare's, and is made from a MS. copy of the 
 Canons. 
 
 ^ E. Ter-Minassiantz, Die Armenische Kifche, p. 75.
 
 The Eastern Churches 55 
 
 donian faith then Imposed had never again been definitely- 
 rejected until the Council was held at Manazkert in 727. 
 
 In the Acts of this Council we read : ^ 
 
 "Accordingly we shall banish the corruptible from the 
 incorruptible ; that is to say, we shall henceforth exclude 
 leaven and water from the life-giving mystery, that those 
 who follow me may not regard this, and by bringing back 
 these corruptions be led astray and fall into the diphysite 
 faith of Chalcedon, and thereby lead astray the dioceses of 
 Armenia, as [was done] by Ezra, who disseminated over our 
 land tares of wrath, which the Lord has enjoined upon me 
 to root up, contriving and establishing a fence indivisible and 
 inseparable. And we shall use the follov/ing means against 
 them. We shall exclude leaven and water from the divine 
 Mystery [they being] a pretext for [asserting] the corrup- 
 tibility of the flesh of Christ " and for its disjunction. 
 Accordingly if henceforth any one shall celebrate the Mystery 
 with leaven, let him be accursed and suffer a severe and 
 extreme punishment." 
 
 This important document is interesting when compared 
 with John's Canon given above. His Canons were in all 
 probability issued on the strength of the decisions of this 
 Couiicil. It is fairly clear, from the above passage of the 
 Acts of this Council, that it was at this time that the use of 
 unleavened bread was made the definite general and authori- 
 tative use of the Armenian Church, though probably the 
 practice had been a common though not authoritative one 
 before. Stephen Asolik (who flourished at the end of the 
 tenth and beginning of the eleventh century) states that it 
 
 ' The translation is again Mr. Conybeare's, and is from the work entitled, 
 Of John the Philosopher, Catholicos of the Armenians, concerning the 
 Councils which have been among the Armenians, contained in the letter-book 
 of the Patriarchs ; the MS. followed was copied from an archetype of the year 
 of the Armenians ^2J i.e., 1078. 
 
 ^ This was aimed at the Syrian Julianists.
 
 56 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 was at this Council that it was definitely decided to celebrate 
 the Eucharist without leaven or water/ Also it is to be 
 noticed that the Acts make no mention of St. Gregory as 
 the originator of the use, while in John's Canons the 
 tradition is referred to in the company of other traditions 
 of a Judaising nature. 
 
 In later Armenian writings, of the thirteenth and four- 
 teenth centuries, Mr. Conybeare informs me that many 
 passages from the older Fathers are quoted in support of these 
 usages, but that none of them are any proof of the existence 
 of the use of unleavened bread before the eighth century. 
 
 The explanation of the custom is not simple. The facts 
 remain as follow. There was a common use of the unmixed 
 cup among the Armenians in the seventh century, as is 
 witnessed to by the Trullan Canon. Also, if the works 
 ascribed to Jacob of Edessa against the use of unleavened 
 bread are really his, then there was also a use of unleavened 
 bread among the Armenians at the end of the seventh 
 century. 
 
 This use was not, however, binding, authoritative, and 
 general until it was made so by the Council of Manazkert 
 for doctrinal reasons in 727. 
 
 Among the Armenians, as I have mentioned, were 
 observed many strange customs of a Judaising character. 
 One of these was the custom of eating the Passover on 
 Maundy Thursday. This observance John of Odzun, among 
 other things, restricted to priests alone. At this Jewish rite, 
 based on the old law, the " old Zatik," it is most probable 
 that the directions of the old law were followed, and un- 
 leavened bread was eaten. ^ It almost looks as if when this 
 
 ' Ter-Minassiantz, p. 76. 
 
 ^ If Ludolf is to be relied upon, the Abyssinians use unleavened bread at the 
 Eucharist on Maundy Thursday alone {Com?nent. ad suam Hist., p. 5). 
 It is noticeable that the Abyssinian Church is even perhaps more Judaising 
 than the Armenian.
 
 ARMENIAN WAFER 
 
 [57
 
 The Eastern Churches 57 
 
 custom, which in all probability was suppressed by the 
 orthodox Ezra in the time of Heraclius, was revived by 
 the Council of Manazkert, the use of unleavened bread 
 at the " old Zatik " on Maundy Thursday .was extended 
 to the " New Zatik " of Easter Sunday, for the purpose of 
 insisting upon the one nature of our Blessed Lord. 
 
 The facts, then, seem to be that unleavened bread was 
 introduced as the authoritative use of the Armenian Church 
 in 727 by the Council of Manazkert. 
 
 If so it is a curious coincidence. It was at more or less 
 the same time that the use of unleavened bread seems to 
 have come into use in the West, not there, however, for 
 doctrinal reasons, but for the simple reason of convenience. 
 
 Le Brun remarks : " Ce seul Decret [of Manazkert] de 
 leur conciliabule montre suffisamment qu'ils se servoient au- 
 paravant de Pain leve ; et Ton peut d'ailleurs regarder ce 
 fait comme certain, quand on considere . . . qu'ils ont tire 
 leur Liturgie de I'Eglise de Cesaree en Cappadocie et de celle 
 de Constantinople on il n'y pas lieu de douter qu'on ne se 
 servit de Pain leve." ^ 
 
 The Present Use of the Armenians 
 
 The bread used by the Armenians at the present day 
 is a round unleavened wafer 3 inches long and ^ inch 
 thick. It is stamped with a crucifix and a narrow orna- 
 mental border runs round the edge of it. The bread is 
 made in a chamber in the church specially reserved for that 
 purpose, and is prepared by the priest. While he is preparing 
 the bread the priest reads certain prayers. At the same time 
 he makes a wafer for the avriSoypou or pain benitj to be 
 distributed after service to those who have been present. 
 This last wafer is different in form from that used for the 
 Eucharist, being larger, softer, and thinner. 
 
 ^ Le Brun, Explic. de la Messe, iii. 119.
 
 58 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 Only one wafer is used in the Eucharist, varying in size 
 according to the estimated number of communicants. The 
 Communion is in both species, a particle of the Host being 
 dipped in the cup and then placed on the tongue of the 
 communicant,^ no spoon being used, as in the other Eastern 
 Churches. The same practice as to Reservation obtains 
 among the Armenian as in the Orthodox Church, the Host 
 being dipped in the cup and dried and so reserved. 
 
 In the illustration the lettering of the superscription is 
 I. N.R.I. That on the left side is JS = Jesus ; on the right 
 KHS = Christ. 
 
 The Maronites 
 
 The Maronites, who entered into communion with the 
 Roman Church in the twelfth century, and have ever since 
 remained in communion with her, use in the Eucharist the 
 Latin unleavened wafer. This body alone of Oriental com- 
 munions is indifferent as to the preparation of the bread on 
 the same day on which it is to be used in the Eucharist. 
 
 The East Syrians, or Nestorians 
 
 Among the fvast Syrians, or Nestorians, some curious 
 and most interesting customs obtain as to the bread of 
 the Eucharist. The cakes used are, of course, leavened. 
 They are round in shape, 2-2|- inches across by 1-inch 
 thick, and are stamped with a crosslet and four small 
 crosses. But the most interesting of the Nestorian customs, 
 in this connection, is their use of the Holy Leaven. A 
 small portion of this is mixed with the dough from which 
 the bread for the Eucharist is made, and it is claimed 
 that this Holy Leaven, which is counted among the 
 
 ' M. Ormanian (Armenian ex-Patriarch of Constantinople), L'£glise 
 Armemenne, p. 89.
 
 The Eastern Churches 59 
 
 Nestorians as one of the Sacraments, Is derived from the 
 Apostles themselves. Badger • gives the legend as told by- 
 John Bar-Zobi, who flourished at the end of the twelfth 
 and the beginning of the thirteenth century, as follows : 
 
 "... And when He was about to close His dispen- 
 sation, and His passion and death drew nigh, on the 
 evening preceding Friday He committed His passover to 
 His disciples in the bread and wine, as it is written, and 
 gave to each a loaf ; but to John He gave two loaves, and 
 put it into his heart to eat one and to preserve the other, 
 that it might serve as leaven to be retained in the Church 
 for perpetual commemoration. After this, when our Lord 
 was seized by the Jews, and the disciples through fear 
 hid themselves, John was the only one who remained. 
 And when they crucified the Lord in much ignominy 
 with the thieves, John alone was present, determined to 
 see what would become of Him. Then the chief priests 
 ordered that the crucified ones should be taken down 
 from the cross, and that their legs should be broken, in 
 order that, if yet alive, they might die outright. The 
 soldiers did this to the thieves, but when they came to 
 our Lord and found that He was dead already, they 
 broke not His legs, but one of them with a spear pierced 
 His side, and straightway there came out blood and water, 
 of which John was witness. Now this blood is a token 
 of the Sacrament of the Body and Blood in the Church, 
 and the water is the token of the new birth in believers. 
 John was the only one who perceived this separation of 
 water and the blood, and he bare true witness thereof, as 
 he says, that we might believe. He declares that he saw 
 them unmixed, and that he did not take of them together, 
 but of each separately. He took of the blood upon the 
 loaf which he had received from the Paschal Feast, and he 
 ' The Nestorians and their Rituals, vol. ii. pp. 161-2. London, 1892,
 
 6o The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 took of the water in that same vessel which had been 
 committed to him by John the Baptist. The very blood 
 of His body, therefore, mixed with the bread which He 
 had called His body, and the water from His side mingled 
 with the water of Baptism. After He rose from the grave 
 and ascended up in glory to His Father and sent the 
 grace of His Spirit upon His disciples to endow them 
 with wisdom, He commanded His Apostles to ordain in 
 His Church that same leaven which He had taken from 
 His body to be for the Sacrament of His Body and also 
 for the Sacrament of Baptism, And when the disciples 
 went forth to convert the nations they divided the leaven 
 amongst themselves, and they took oil of unction and 
 mixed it with the water which was kept in the vessel, 
 and they divided this also amongst themselves to be a 
 leaven for Baptism. The loaf which John had, and which 
 was mixed with the blood which flowed from His side, 
 they bruised into powder, then mixed it with flour and 
 salt, and divided it among them, each portion being put 
 into a separate vessel to serve as leaven for the Body and 
 Blood of Christ in the Church. This is the account which 
 I have read, which bore the sign of Peter, and I have 
 written it as I found it for the benefit of such as may 
 read this our epistle. The Presbyter Rabban Shimoon, 
 who first related the narrative to me and then afterwards 
 showed me the written account, can witness to the truth." 
 
 Badger further quotes ^ from 'The Jewels of Mar Abd 
 Jeshua, Metropolitan of Nisibis in 1298 : "The Holy and 
 Blessed Apostles Thomas and Bartholomew of the Twelve 
 and Adi and Mari of the Seventy, who discipled the 
 East, committed to all the Eastern Churches a Holy 
 Leaven to be kept for the perfecting of the administra- 
 tion of our Lord's Body until His coming again." 
 * The Nestoria7is and their Rituals, vol. ii. pp. 409, 410.
 
 The Eastern Churches 6i 
 
 The account of the origin of the Holy Leaven which 
 Bishop Maclean gives from Isaac of Ishbad, in 'The 
 Catholicos of the East and his People, is derived from John 
 Bar-Zobi. 
 
 A form of the legend, which varies somewhat from 
 the above and is interesting as showing that the writer 
 does not regard the Holy Leaven as essential, and also as 
 witnessing: to the fact that it was not used in other 
 Churches of the East, is given by Solomon of El-Basra 
 (thirteenth century) in his Book of the Bee} It is as follows: 
 
 " Some men have a tradition that, when our Lord 
 broke His body for His disciples in the upper chamber, 
 John the son of Zebedee hid a part of his portion until 
 our Lord rose from the dead. . . . [The Lord's Blood 
 was on Thomas's finger.]. . . . And John took that piece 
 of consecrated, and wiped up that blood with it ; and the 
 Easterns Mar Addai and Mar Mari took that piece, and 
 with it they sanctified this unleavened bread which has 
 been handed down among us. The other disciples did 
 not take any of it, because they said, ' We will consecrate 
 for ourselves whenever we wish.' As for the oil of 
 baptism. . . . This account we have heard by ear from a 
 recluse and Tre/atoSeurif?, and we have not received it from 
 Scripture." 
 
 Solomon's reference to the other disciples not taking the 
 leaven seems to point to the fact that, in the thirteenth 
 century, the use of the Holy Leaven was a unique Nes- 
 torian custom. 
 
 Year by year, when the Holy Leaven of a church is 
 nearly expended, on Maundy Thursday it is renewed with 
 great solemnity. What remains of the Holy Leaven is 
 mixed with dough, salt, and olive-oil, and leavens the 
 whole. And no Eucharist can be celebrated without it. 
 ' Ed. Budge, 1886; chap, xlvii, 2nd paragraph.
 
 62 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 It is renewed by a priest and deacon with a special office 
 called " the renewal of the Holy Leaven." 
 
 But not only so do the Nestorians obtain a continuity 
 in the Eucharistic bread. The continuity is doubly main- 
 tained, for, besides their practice of mixing some of the 
 Holy Leaven with the dough, they save (like the West 
 Syrians) a piece of the dough from each making to be 
 incorporated in the dough of the next making. 
 
 The bread is made solemnly, and a form of prayer 
 is used at the makino-. 1 ffive the two orders : 
 
 (i) The Order of the preparation of the Oblation. 
 
 (2) The Order for the renewal of the Holy Leaven, or 
 Malca. 
 
 FROM THE LITURGY OF THE NESTORIANS 
 
 THE ORDER 1 OF THE PREPARATION OF THE 
 
 OBLATION 
 
 (THE MAKING OF THE LOAVES) 
 
 Our Father 
 The priest prays. 
 
 Vouchsafe us, O our Lord and our God, to go on in 
 profitable works which are well-pleasing to Thy majesty, 
 that our delight may be in Thy law, and we may meditate 
 therein day and night, Lord of all. Father and Son and Holy 
 Ghost, for ever. 
 
 Psalms i-xxx 
 
 \In three hullale^ before each subdivision of which is said a 
 prayer like the foregoing?^ Meanwhile he brings fine flour and 
 olive-oil and warm water and mixes them together and pours 
 
 * This Order is reprinted by permission from Brightman's Liturgies 
 Eastern and Western, pp. 247-9.
 
 EAST SYRIAN (NESTORIAN) LOAVES 
 
 [63
 
 The Eastern Churches 63 
 
 leaven into them} He puts in salt according to his discretion. 
 He says the three hull die until the dough is made. IV hen it is 
 made he stamps the dough in the middle^ on the east, on the 
 westy on the north, and on the south, and covers it carefully until 
 the time of preparing [the loaves']. 
 
 The Order of Preparing 
 
 When he prepares he first takes the portion for the 
 m'caprana '^ from the top of the dough, then the leaven, and then 
 he takes from the middle of the dough the portion of the Malca 
 [i.e. the priest' s loaf^ and makes in it a square cavity, in zvhich 
 he puts a little olive-oil kept for the purpose. 
 
 He goes and brings the Malca, saying Ps. cxlv. i-j a : 
 then he opens the vessel and with two fingers takes some of the 
 Malca, saying: 
 
 This dough is signed and hallowed with the old and 
 holy leaven of our Lord Jesus Christ, which was given 
 and handed down to us by our holy fathers Mar Addai 
 and Mar Mari and Mar Thoma the Apostles, who made 
 disciples of this eastern region : in the name of the Father 
 and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. 
 
 He signs the dough in the form of a cross and then takes the 
 Malca and signs the oil in the priest's loaf in like manner. He 
 also takes in two fingers some of the Malca, saying: 
 
 This broken portion is signed and hallowed with this 
 Holy Leaven in the name of the Father and of the Son and of 
 the Holy Ghost. 
 
 He puts on the cover of the vessel containing the Malca and 
 
 • I.e. a portion of the dough from the last Eucharist, kept as leaven 
 (.h'mira), not to be confused with the Holy Leaven (Malca). 
 
 ^ I.e. the Eulogia, or Antidoron, the blessed bread (not the Sacrament) 
 given to the people after service is over.
 
 64 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 goes and carries it to its place^ i.e. to the altar ^ saying Ps. xxiv. 
 1-6. Then he says : 
 
 Our King is with us, and our God is with us, and our 
 helper is the God of Jacob. Happy are the people that are 
 in such a case. 
 
 Repeat : Yea, blessed are the people who have the Lord 
 for their God. 
 
 He proceeds to Ps. xxiv. 7 and 10 and hangs up the vessel 
 in its place ^ and he proceeds^ beginning : 
 
 Glory to God in the highest. 
 
 Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name, 
 Thy kingdom come. 
 
 Holy, holy, holy art Thou, our Father which art in 
 heaven : heaven and earth are full of the greatness of Thy 
 glory. Watchers and men cry to Thee, Holy, holy, holy 
 art Thou. 
 
 Our Father, etc. 
 
 Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy 
 Ghost, 
 
 From everlasting to everlasting, world without end. 
 
 y^men. 
 
 Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name. 
 Thy kingdom come. 
 
 Holy, holy, holy art Thou, etc. 
 
 He says Pss. Ixxxii.-ci. while signing and kneading. 
 
 When he has finished the preparation he goes to the oven 
 and says : 
 
 He brought me also out of the horrible pit, out of the 
 mire and clay : and set my feet upon the rock, and ordered 
 my goings. 
 
 He fills the censer with coals 'of fire and hangs it up and 
 covers the fire in the oven until it has got somewhat low. He
 
 The Eastern Churches 6^ 
 
 wipes [the side of the oven] carefully and uncovers the fire. 
 He takes a little incense and puts it in^ saying: 
 
 This earthen vessel is hallowed : in the name of the 
 Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, 
 
 He proceeds : 
 
 Holy God, holy mighty, holy immortal, have mercy upon us. 
 
 Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy 
 Ghost. 
 Holy God, holy mighty, holy immortal, have mercy upon us. 
 
 From everlasting to everlasting, world without end. 
 Holy God, holy mighty, holy immortal, have mercy upon us. 
 
 He puts his hand into the oven and takes the priest's loaf^ 
 in his hand^ saying : 
 
 The King of kings' came down to be baptized, and 
 bowed His head to be baptized of him. 
 
 He arranges the priest's loaf on the east side of the oven and 
 another on the westy sayings From the east and from the west : 
 then another on the north and another on the south^ sayings 
 From the north and from the south ; and another on the right 
 of the priest's loaf sayings Titus ^ on the right hand, and 
 another on the left^ sayings Dumachus ^ on the left : two 
 robbers were crucified with the one heavenly Treasure : he 
 on His right hand would not cease from his robbery, but in 
 his last robbery robbed the paradise of Eden : for the others 
 he says, They shall be fat and well-liking, that they may 
 show how true the Lord my strength is, and that there i^no 
 unrighteousness in Him. 
 
 When he has done arranging them he says : 
 
 Like the smoke of the goodly incense and the savour of 
 
 ' Malca. * Malca d* Make. 
 
 ^ Cf. Evang. Infantice, 23.
 
 66 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 the sweet censer receive, O Christ our Saviour, the request 
 and prayer of Thy servants, three times. 
 
 He takes a little incense and pours it into the oven, which he 
 covers^ saying : 
 
 Halleluiah, halleluiah : glory be to Thee, O Lord, 
 three times. 
 
 The following Rite is tlfat by which the Malca,* or Holy 
 Leaven, is renewed when the supply begins to fail. It is not 
 necessarily performed by a Bishop. The Malca is the Holy 
 Leaven received by tradition from the Apostles, a portion of 
 which, as well as a portion of the dough of the last making, 
 is mixed with every making of bread for the F.ucharist. 
 
 THE ORDER FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE HOLY 
 LEAVEN; THAT IS TO SAY, MALCA ^ 
 
 First, on the Thursday of Pascha (i.e. Maundy Thursday) 
 they shall bring fine wheaten flour that is " Smidha^' ^ two 
 thirds and one third of fine pure pounded salt^ and they shall 
 pour upon it a little fine preserved olive-oil and three drops of 
 
 ' It may be as well to draw attention to the fact that it is sometimes 
 stated, at least by "Jacobite" ecclesiastics, that the East Syrians mix with 
 the bread for the Eucharist a portion of the Reserved Sacrament itself. This 
 is not the case. In the first place, it is definitely forbidden among the 
 Nestorians to reserve the Holy Sacrament over night. And this statement is 
 probably explained by a misunderstanding of the word "Sacrament '' used in 
 this connection. The Malca, or Holy Leaven, is numbered by the Nestorians 
 among the Sacraments, and so in one sense the Sacrament is mingled with 
 each bread-making; but the Sacrament thus mingled is the Sacrament of the 
 Malca, or Holy Leaven, and not the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist. 
 
 * This translation has been submitted to the Bishop of Moray, Ross, and 
 Caithness, and appears as corrected by him, and to him are due all the 
 annotations. 
 
 * = (TffllboKlS.
 
 The Eastern Churches 67 
 
 wafer, and they shall mix them together on the carved Eucharistic 
 slab, the Sacristan and another priest or more and the deacons 
 with them. And they shall set the Cross and the Gospel book 
 on the carved Eucharistic slab with the censer and lights and 
 shall begin : 
 
 Holy, holy, holy art Thou, our Father which art in 
 heaven : heaven and earth are full of the greatness of Thy 
 glory. Watchers and men cry to thee Holy, holy, holy 
 art Thou, 
 
 And, Our Father. 
 
 Prayer 
 
 May the worshipful and glorious Name of Thy glorious 
 Trinity be worshipped and glorified and honoured and 
 exalted and confessed and blessed in heaven and on earth 
 at all times, Lord of all, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost 
 for ever ; 
 
 Or . 
 
 Thee, O King, whom kings worship, and the adorable 
 honour of whose majesty companies and ten thousands of 
 angels and archangels, standing in great fear and trembling, 
 serve and celebrate, we are bound to confess, worship, and 
 glorify at all seasons and times, Lord of all, Father, Son, and 
 Holy Ghost for ever. Amen. 
 
 And they shall perform the three Hulldle : " God standeth " 
 (Ps. Ixxxii.), *' My song shall be alway of the loving- 
 kindness of the Lord " (Ps. Ixxxix.), and " The Lord is 
 King " (Ps. xciii,). 
 
 Prayer 
 
 For all Thy helps and graces (given) to us, which cannot 
 be repaid, let us confess and glorify Thee without ceasing in 
 Thy crowned Church, which is full of helps and all bkssings.
 
 68 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 For Thou art the Lord and Creator of all, Father, Son, and 
 Holy Ghost for ever. Amen. 
 
 They say the Lakhumara. Thee, O Lord, we confess : 
 and Thee, Jesus Christ, we glorify : for Thou art the 
 quickener of our bodies : and Thou art the Saviour of our 
 souls. / was glad when they said unto me^ We go into the house 
 of the Lord. Thee, Lord of all, etc. Glory be, etc. From 
 everlasting to everlasting. Amen. Thee, Lord of all, etc. 
 'They say^ Let us pray. Peace be with us. 
 
 Prayer 
 
 Thou, O my Lord, art in truth the quickener of our 
 bodies, and Thou art the good Saviour of our souls and the 
 perpetual guardian of our lives, and Thee are we bound to 
 praise, worship, and glorify at all times. Lord of all. Father, 
 Son, and Holy Ghost for ever. Amen. 
 
 And the deacon says : Raise up your voice and glorify, all 
 people, the living God. 
 
 And they shall say : Holy God, holy mighty, holy 
 immortal, have mercy upon us. Glory be, etc. Holy 
 God, etc. From everlasting, etc. Holy God, etc. They 
 add, Let us pray. Peace be with us. ' 
 
 Prayer 
 
 Holy and glorious and mighty and immortal, who 
 dwellest in the saints, and whose will is pleased with them, 
 turn, O my Lord, we beseech Thee, and be merciful, and 
 have pity on us, as Thou art wont, at all times, Lord 
 of all, etc. 
 
 And the deacon says : Bend your heads for the laying on 
 of hands, and receive a blessing. 
 
 And the priest pronounces in a low voice: 
 
 O Treasure enriching to those who receive it : O Thou
 
 The Eastern Churches 69 
 
 who art rich and whose gifts are not withheld from the 
 poor ; O Thou who art good and dost not injure Thy 
 labourers ; O Lord who dost not neglect Thy servants ; 
 Hear, O my Lord, the prayer of Thy servants in Thy 
 clemency and receive the petition of those who worship Thee, 
 according to Thy mercies ; and answer in Thy mercies our 
 requests from Thy rich treasure-house, and keep in Thy 
 grace the beloved flock of Thy pasture from all harm, and 
 establish Thy peace among us all for ever, Lord of all. 
 Father, Son, and Holy Ghost for ever. 
 
 And he raises his voice and says : May our souls be per- 
 fected in the one complete faith of Thy glorious Trinity, 
 and may we all in one union of love be worthy to raise to 
 Thee glory, and honour, confession, and worship at all times, 
 Lord of all, etc. 
 
 'They say The Anthem.^ 
 
 [Ps. cxlv. 7] The memorial of Thine abundant kindness 
 shall he showed. Thy Church our Saviour maketh : the 
 memorial of Thy precious passion : which was accomplished 
 for our salvation : keep her children from harm. 
 
 [Ps. xlv. 1 8] / will make Thy name to he remembered in 
 all generations. Thy Church, O our Saviour, etc. 
 
 Go on to the tune, " The Blessed MartyrsT 
 
 [Ps. Iv. 20] He that abideth of old. The mystery which 
 was hid from the ages and generations : by the good pleasure 
 of the Creator those in heaven and those on earth : men 
 learnt in the manifestation of Christ : and men and angels 
 began : to tell of the holiness of His glory : Three [Persons] 
 one Godhead. 
 
 [Ps. cxvi. 13.] Before all the people. In the river 
 Jordan John baptized Him : the Lamb of God : and when 
 He was coming up from the waters : the Holy Spirit of 
 
 > In the Anthems and Hymns of Praise a colon marks the change of chant 
 and a full stop where the choir changes.
 
 70 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 Truth : in the likeness of the bodily form of a dove : came 
 down and lighted upon the head : of our Saviour after He 
 -wiLs baptized. 
 
 Go on to the tune^ " God the WordT [Ps. xl. 2] He set 
 my feet upon a rock and ordered my goings. Lord, in the 
 foundation of the rock of the truth, Simon Peter, Thou didst 
 establish me : and in Baptism Thou didst promise me true 
 adoption : and I by my deeds have become like that heir 
 who squandered his possessions : I beseech Thee like him, 
 making request, " I have sinned against heaven and before 
 Thee, and am no more worthy to be called Thy son " : 
 merciful Father, have mercy upon me. 
 
 [Ps. civ. 5] That it never should move at any time. Lord, 
 upon the foundation of the faith of Simon Peter Thou hast 
 built Thy Church : and because of Thy promise to Him 
 the waves and storms of heathenism have not shaken it : 
 and when Satan saw that by his angels he could not prevail 
 against the Catholic [Church] : he incited the sons of her 
 teaching in every quarter [of the world] : to destroy one 
 another with the shafts of envy : bring to nought her 
 vainglorious ones : who envy and make light of one 
 another : and may Thy peace reign over her children. 
 
 Go on to the tune " Whosoever is wise.'' [Ps. cxlv. i] / 
 will magnify Thee, O my Lord, the King. O Christ, the Son 
 of God, who camest for our salvation : remember Thy 
 Church which Thou didst purchase from eternity : and 
 subject to it the divided [or, striving ?] peoples which 
 delight in war : as Thou didst promise to Peter its founder : 
 that the gates of Hell and Hell's tyrant should not prevail 
 against it for ever: confirm Thy word,0 our Saviour,unto it: 
 that Thou art its King : and the bringer-up of its children : 
 and the boast of its inhabitants. 
 
 [Ps. Ixxiv. 2] Remember Thy Church which Thou didst 
 purchase from eternity. O our Lord, in Thy mercy guard
 
 The Eastern Churches 71 
 
 Thy Church : which Thou didst elect and establish from 
 eternity : and make to cease from it wars and contentions : 
 and bind its sons with love and concord : let its priests be 
 in peace and firm faith : its shepherd keep in Thy grace that 
 he may be a defender : and may seek from Thee peace to 
 his flock at all times. Go on to the turn of " Blessed art 
 'Thou, O Lord of all. [Ps. cxlv. 1 1] They shall tell the glory 
 of Thy kingdom. Praised, O my Lord, be Thy Advent ' 
 and Thy Nativity and Thy Upbringing and the Com- 
 memoration of Thy Mother : and the Epiphany and the 
 Feasts of Thy preachers John and Peter and Paul Thy 
 disciples: and the four Evangelists who wrote Thy Gospel, 
 and Thy friend Stephen and the company of Diodore,^ and 
 the company of Mar Narsai and Mar Abha '^ : and all the 
 departed who confessed Thy domination, O Thou Hope of 
 Thy true ones. 
 
 [Ps. xxxiv, i] I will bless the Lord at all times. Blessed 
 be Thy Fast * O our Lord, and Thy Going-up to Jerusalem, 
 and Thy Passover, and Thy [Feet-] washing : and Thy 
 Passion and Thy Death and Thy Resurrection : and the 
 Commemoration of Thy confessors and George Thy martyr : 
 and the day of Thy Ascension and the Descent of the Holy 
 Ghost, the token given to the Apostles : and the two 
 Inventions of the Cross of Light and the Hallowing of 
 Thy Church,^ and the Transfiguration, whose greatness 
 conquers all. 
 
 Glory be to the Father, etc., to the tune of *' The Great 
 Mystery''' With the eye of understanding and of love let 
 us all look on Christ : through the mysteries and types 
 
 ' These are the seasons and festivals of the first part of the ecclesiastical 
 year. 
 
 * Commonly called "the Greek doctors." 
 ' " The Syrian doctors." 
 
 * I.e. Lent and the following holy days. 
 
 * A sort of general dedication festival.
 
 72 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 which He has delivered to us : when He was led to the 
 passion of the Cross : and when upon the Holy Altar He 
 was set a living sacrifice : and as angels the priests celebrate 
 the memorial of His Death with voices of praise, saying : 
 " Glory be to Him for His ineffable gift." 
 
 'They go on to say the Creed : We believe in one God the 
 Father almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible. 
 And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, the 
 first-born of every creature, who was begotten of His 
 Father before all worlds and not made, very God of very 
 God, of one substance with His Father : by whom the 
 worlds were framed and all things were created : who for 
 us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, 
 and was incarnate of the Holy Ghost and was made man, 
 and was conceived and born of the Virgin Mary, and 
 suffered and was crucified in the days of Pontius Pilate, and 
 was buried, and rose again the third day according to the 
 Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sat down on the 
 right hand of His Father, and shall come again to judge 
 the dead and the quick. And in one Holy Ghost, the 
 spirit of truth, who proceedeth from the Father, the Spirit, 
 the giver of life. And in one holy and apostolic Catholic 
 Church : and we acknowledge one baptism for the remission 
 of sins, and the resurrection of our bodies, and the life 
 everlasting. Amen. 
 
 And the deacon says the Litany. 
 
 Let us pray. Peace be with us all. 
 
 Pray and make request of God the Lord of all that ye 
 be unto Him a kingdom, holy priests and people : cry to the 
 Lord God of hosts with all your heart and all your soul, for 
 He is God the Father of Compassion, merciful and pitiful, 
 that wisheth not that those whom He hath fashioned should 
 perish, but that they should repent and live before Him. 
 And especially are we bound to pray and confess and
 
 The Eastern Cfiurches 73 
 
 worship and glorify and honour and exalt our God the 
 adorable Father, Lord of all, who by His Christ wrought 
 a good hope and salvation for our souls, that He fulfil in 
 us His grace and mercy and compassion unto the end. 
 I^. Amen. 
 
 "The deacon proceeds : 
 
 With request and beseeching we ask for the angel of 
 peace and mercy 
 
 I^. From Thee, O Lord. 
 
 Night and day throughout our life we ask for continual 
 peace for Thy Church, and life without sin 
 
 I^. From Thee, O Lord. 
 
 We ask continual love, which is the bond of perfectness, 
 with the confirmation of the Holy Ghost 
 
 ^. From Thee, O Lord. 
 
 We ask forgiveness of sins and those things which help 
 our lives and appease Thy Godhead 
 
 I^. From Thee, O Lord. 
 
 We ask the mercy and compassion of the Lord continu- 
 ally at all times 
 
 I^. From Thee, O Lord. 
 
 Let us commit our souls and one another's souls to the 
 Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost. 
 
 And the priest repeats in a low voice this [Prayer ofj 
 Inclination : O Lord God Almighty (repeat) assist my 
 weakness by Thy mercies, and by the help of Thy grace 
 make me worthy by Thy help to draw nigh and sign this 
 matter with the sign of the cross to sanctify it ; that it may 
 be for the signing and the perfecting of the dough of the 
 body of our Lord Jesus Christ. 
 
 Canon ^ : And to Thee and to Him and to the Holy 
 Ghost let us offer glory and honour and praise and worship 
 now and for evermore. Amen. 
 
 ' Here used in the sense of the conclusion of a prayer.
 
 74 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 And he shall sign himself and proceed and say \this'\ 
 Canon: The grace ot our Lord Jesus Christ and the love 
 of God the Father and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost 
 be with us all now and for evermore. Amen. 
 
 And he shall sign the matter. And he shall proceed: 
 Thee the God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Israel, 
 glorious King. And he shall proceed: Let us praise and 
 worship and glorify God the Lord of all. 
 
 And they shall answer : It is meet and right. 
 
 And the deacon shall say : Peace be with us all. 
 
 And the priest says the Gehantha} 
 
 Yea, O Lord God Almighty, Omnipotent (^repeat)^ 
 heavenly Treasure, who suppliest and sheddest Thy mercies 
 on the poor, to Thee we present our souls, our minds, 
 and thoughts, and the understanding of our intellects, the 
 gaze of our eyes cast down, and our hands spread forth 
 to Thee. We cry and pray and supplicate and beseech that 
 Thou wilt sanctify and perfect this matter by the instru- 
 mentality of these Thy feeble and vile and wretched servants 
 and by the alighting of Thy Holy Spirit, through Thy 
 lovingkindness and Thy mercies. Amen. 
 
 And he says^ instead of a Canon : In the beginning was 
 the Word. And the Word was with God, and the Word 
 was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All 
 things were made by Him, and without Him was not any- 
 thing made that was made. In Him was life, and the life 
 was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness, 
 and the darkness comprehended it not. Now and for 
 evermore. Amen. 
 
 And he signs the matter. And then he takes the old from 
 
 the altar and signs the new with it and says : Signed and 
 
 sanctified and mixed is this new leaven with this holy 
 
 and old leaven of our Lord Jesus Christ, which has been 
 
 ' Prayer of inclination, said with a bowed head and low voice.
 
 The Eastern Churches 75 
 
 handed down to us from our spiritual fathers, Mar Mari 
 and Mar Addai and Mar Thoma, the blessed Apostles, 
 teachers of this Eastern Country, and has been carried 
 from place to place and from country to country for the 
 perfecting and the mixing of the living Bread ^ of the 
 life-giving mysteries, as often as reason of necessity requires, 
 in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy 
 Ghost. 
 
 ylnd they shall mix them zvell with one another. 
 
 Prayer 
 
 To Thy wonderful and ineffable dispensation, O my 
 Lord, wlilch in mercies and clemency was perfected and 
 made and fulfilled for the renewal and salvation of our 
 nature, in the firstfrults which were of us, we lift up glory 
 and honour and praise and worship at all times, Lord of 
 all, etc. 
 
 Canon " 
 
 Priest. Come, let us praise the Lord, and let us sing 
 unto God the Saviour. 
 
 From error and from sin and from deaths in His compassion^ 
 our Lord has redeemed us : let us zvorship Him, and let us 
 glorify Him. 
 
 Come, let us praise the Lord, and let us sing praise unto 
 God the Saviour. 
 
 Deacon. Let us come before His presence with thanks- 
 giving and let us glorify Him with songs. 
 
 Priest. For the Lord Is a great God, a great King 
 above all gods. 
 
 Deacon. In His hands are the foundations of the 
 
 ' Lit. the breaking. 
 
 * Here used in the sense of a chant intercalated with a psalm (more 
 elaborate than farsing).
 
 -76 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 earth and the height of the hills : the sea is His, and He 
 made it. 
 
 Priest. And His hands prepared the dry land : come, 
 let us kneel and worship Him. 
 
 Deacon. And let us praise the Lord who made us : for 
 He Is our God, and we are His people and the sheep of 
 His pasture. 
 
 From error and from sin and from death, in His compassion, 
 our Lord has redeemed us : let us worship Him and let us 
 glorify Him. 
 
 Priest. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to 
 the Holy Ghost, from everlasting to everlasting. Amen. 
 
 O Thou, who didst say in Thy teaching to Thy disciples 
 ' Knock, and I will open ' ; open the door to our prayer. 
 
 Praise 
 
 Glory be to Thy mercies, Christ our King : Son of 
 God, worshipped of all. For Thou art our Lord and 
 Thou art our God : the head of our lives and our blessed 
 Hope. Thee worship the Orders above : and the multi- 
 tudes below in one symphony : praising Thee who art 
 invisible : who didst manifest Thyself in our body in the 
 fulness of time. When Thy mercies were moved thou 
 didst please in Thy love : to come for our salvation and 
 didst free our race. Our sorrows Thou didst heal, and our 
 guilt thou didst pardon : and our mortality thou didst 
 raise in Thy mercies. And Thou didst found on earth a 
 holy Church : as the type of that above in heaven. In a 
 type thou didst sign her and in love thou didst wed her: 
 in mercy thou didst receive her, by suffering thou didst 
 perfect her. And the hater of men, lo ! he doth trouble 
 her : by the boldness of his audacity by his ministers.^ 
 
 ' I.e. the evil angels.
 
 The Eastern Churches 77 
 
 Neglect not, O my Lord, the holy Church : that the 
 promise of Thy words be not falsified. Let not her fair 
 beauty be disfigured : let not her great riches be reduced 
 to poverty. Remember Thy promise to Peter : fulfil in- 
 deed the thing that Thou hast said. Make firm her doors 
 and strengthen her bars : lift up her horn and exalt her 
 walls. Bless her sons and preserve her children : and set 
 at peace her priests and put to shame those who hate her. 
 And establish within her the peace which is from Thee : 
 and make to cease from her dividing schisms. And grant 
 that we may dwell a quiet habitation : without confusion 
 in reverence for the truth, keeping our faith : in good 
 hope and perfect love. And also let our conversation be 
 pleasing to Thee : and may we receive mercy in the day 
 of recompense. And without ceasing may we offer praise : 
 to Thy Father through Thee and to the Holy Ghost : to 
 whom be praise through all generations : of the ages of 
 the ages. /Jmen and Amen. 
 
 Litany 
 
 Let us stand in order all of us. In joy and in glad- 
 ness let us pray and say, Our Lord have mercy upon us. 
 
 And they shall answer : Our Lord have mercy upon us. 
 
 Lord Almighty, Omnipotent, God of our fathers, we 
 beseech Thee. I^\ Our Lord, etc. 
 
 Holy and glorious, who dwellest in the saints and whose 
 will is appeased, we beseech Thee. V^. Our Lord, etc. 
 
 King of kings and Lord of lords, who dwellest in the 
 glorious light, we beseech Thee. I^^ Our Lord, etc. 
 
 Thou whom no man has seen nor ever can see, we 
 beseech Thee. I^. Our Lord, etc. 
 
 Thou who wiliest that all men should be saved and turn 
 to the knowledge of the truth. I^. Our Lord, etc.
 
 78 The Bread of the Eucharist 
 
 For the health of our holy Fathers, Mar N., Catholic 
 Patriarch, and Mar N., Bishop Metropolitan, and for all their 
 clergy, we beseech Thee. I^^ Our Lord, etc. 
 
 Merciful God, Thou who in mercies rulest all, we beseech 
 Thee. I^. Our Lord, etc. 
 
 Thou who in heaven art glorified and on earth art 
 worshipped, we beseech Thee. I^. Our Lord, etc. 
 
 Thy peace and Thy tranquillity establish in the multitude 
 of Thy worshippers, Christ our Saviour, and have mercy 
 upon us. 
 
 y/z^w .•; Holy God (x^./). 68). Jnd : Our Father which 
 art in heaven. 
 
 And they shall say the prayers and concluding bene- 
 diction,^ and they shall place the leaven in a vessel or else 
 in a box [J\ ; and bring it into the sanctuary to the psalm, 
 " The earth is the Lord's " (Ps. xxiv.), and shall suspend it 
 in its place. And for the rest, the sacristan shall bring 
 the matter and wipe it [or perhaps " cover it "] with care 
 well, when first he brings the leaven which is in the 
 sanctuary, with the psalm, " I will magnify Thee, O God, 
 my King " (Ps. cxlv.), and shall sign the matter according 
 to custom, then wipe it and prepare the Bread [for the 
 Eucharist].^ 
 
 ' For these see Maclean's East Syrian Daily Offices, pp. 16-22 (Riviiigton, 
 Percival & Co., 1894). 
 
 * The meaning of the last part of this rubric is not quite clear.
 
 INDEX 
 
 Abyssinians, 47 
 Alcuin, 19 
 Aphraates, 53 
 Armenians, 50 fit. 
 apros 3, 4 
 Augustine, St., 10 
 
 Bancroft, 40 
 
 Basil, St., Canons of, 12 
 
 Bede, 15 
 
 Bona, 20 
 
 Canons of 1603, 39 
 Chapels Royal, 41 
 Chelsea, Council of, 17 
 Chrysostom, St., 10, 1 1 
 Church Orders, 8 
 Copts, 46 
 Cosin, 41 
 Cyprian, St., 9 
 Cyril, St., 7 
 
 Didache, 6 
 
 de Bleys, William, 30 
 
 Durandus, 30 
 
 East Syrians (Nestorian), 58 ff. 
 Elizabeth's Injunctions, 34 
 Epiphanius, St., n 
 
 Gregory of Nyssa, St., 7 
 Gregory the Great, St., 7, 14 
 Gregory the Illuminator, St., 54 
 
 Holy Leaven, 59 
 
 Renewal of, 61, 66 ff. 
 
 Humbert, Cardinal, 25 
 
 Irenaeus, St., 7 
 
 John, Acts of, 9 
 John of Odzun, 53, 56 
 Justin, St., 7 
 
 Lanfranc, 31 
 
 Liber Pontificalis, 13 
 
 Manazkert, Council of, 54 
 Maronites, 58 
 Michael Caerularius, 23 
 
 Narsai, 15 
 
 Nymphaeum, Council of, 28 
 
 Order of Communion, 32 
 
 Origen, 9 
 
 Orthodox Church, 45 
 
 Parker, 35, 36, 38 
 Paschasius Radbertus, 19 
 Paulinus of Nola, St., 11 
 Prayer Book, First, 32 
 
 Second, 33 
 
 of Elizabeth, 33 
 
 Quivil, Peter, 31 
 
 Rhabanus Maurus, 19 
 
 Sodor, Synodal Constitutions of, 31 
 
 Thomas, Jets of, 8 
 
 Toledo, XVIth Council of, 16 
 
 West Syrians (Jacobites), 48 
 
 79
 
 Printed by A. R. Mowbray Sc Co. Ltd. 
 London and Oxford
 
 THE ALCUIN CLUB 
 
 Founded wilh the object of promoting the study of the History and use of 
 the Book of Common Prayer. 
 
 Coininittee 
 
 Athelstan Riley, Esq., Sr., M.A., Chairman. 
 
 E. G. CuTHBERT F. ArcHLEY, Esq., 
 L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. 
 
 W. J. BiRKBECK, Esq., M.A., 
 
 F.S.A. 
 The Rev. Prebendarj' F. E. 
 
 Brightman, M.A. 
 CvRiL S. Cobb, Esq., M.A., B.C.L., 
 
 M.V.O. 
 The Rev. Percy Dearmer, D.D. 
 
 F. C. Eeles, Esq., F.R.Hist.S., 
 F.S.A.Scot. 
 
 The Rev. W. Howard Frere, D.D. 
 Stephen Gaselee, Esq., M.A. 
 W. H. St. John Hope, Esq.,Litt.D. 
 Harold C. King, Esq., M.A. 
 The Rev. T. A. Lacey, M.A. 
 The Rev. J. N. Newland-Smith, 
 
 M.A. 
 C. R. Peers, Esq., M.A., F.S.A. 
 E. G. P. Wyatt, Esq., M.A. 
 The Rev. Canon Chr.Wordsworth, 
 
 M.A. 
 
 Ibon. Secretary anb ITreasurer 
 
 The Rev. Percy Dearmer, D.D. 
 
 Hssistant Secretary 
 
 Miss Ward, 20 Antrim Mansions, Hampstead, London, N.W.
 
 THE ALCUIN CLUB 
 
 THE Alcuin Club has been formed to encourage and assist in the 
 practical study of ceremonial, and the arrangement of Churches, 
 their furniture and ornaments, in accordance with the rubrics of the Book 
 of Common Prayer, strict obedience to which is the guiding principle of 
 the work of the Club. 
 
 The Club consists of Members and Associates, who must be in 
 communion with the Church of England. 
 
 The Subscription for Members is zos. per annum, entitling them to 
 all publications gratis ; and for dissociate! zs. 6d. per annum, entitling 
 them to such of the Tracts gratis, and such reductions on other publications 
 as the Committee may determine. 
 
 Applications for election should be sent to Miss Ward, 20 Antrim 
 Mansions, Hampstead, N.W. 
 
 The Annual Report and List of Members can be obtained from the 
 Honorary Secretary. 
 
 RULES 
 
 1. The object of The Alcuin Club shall be the promotion of the 
 study of the history and use of the Book of Common Prayer. 
 
 2. The Work of the Club shall be the publication of Tracts dealing 
 with the Object of the Club, and such other works as may seem desirable, 
 with reproductions of miniatures from MSS., and photographs of Church 
 Furniture, Ornaments and Vestments. 
 
 3. The Club shall consist of Members and Associates, to be elected 
 by the Committee ; all Members and Associates to be in communion with 
 the Church of England. 
 
 4. The Subscriptions for Members shall be 20/. per annum, entitling 
 them to all publications gratis, and for Associates, zs. dd. per annum, 
 entitling them to such of the Tracts gratis, and such reductions on other 
 publications as the Committee may determine. There shall be no 
 Entrance Fee nor Composition for Subscriptions. 
 
 5. The affairs of the Club shall be managed by a Chairman and a 
 Committee of not more than twenty Members or Associates, to be elected 
 by Members of the Club, and subject as to one-fifth, to retirement by 
 rotation annually. 
 
 6. A General Meeting of the Club shall be held every year on May 
 19th (the anniversary of the death of Alcuin), for the purpose of receiving 
 a Report from the Committee, electing Committee-men, and transacting 
 the general business of the Club. 
 
 7. A General Meeting of the Club may be called at any time by the 
 Chairman or five Members of the Committee. 
 
 8. The Chairman, Treasurer and Secretary shall be elected by the 
 Committee from among their number. 
 
 9. No alteration shall be made in the rules of the Club except at a 
 General Meeting of the Members, seven days' notice of the proposed 
 change having been sent beforehand to all Members of the Club.
 
 PUBLICATIONS 
 
 COLLECTIONS 
 
 L English Altars. A large folio volume with 14 pp. of Collo- 
 types. Explanatory Notes by W. H. St. John Hope, M.A. 
 [0«/ of print, e/ new and enlarged edition is in preparation?^ 
 
 n. Exposition de la Messe. A large folio volume containing 
 a Treatise on the Mass from a French Version of the Legenda 
 Aurea of Jacobus de Voragine, now in the Fitzwilliam 
 Museum at Cambridge, and 22 plates from Illustrations in 
 this MS. Together with four Tracts from "The Lay Folks' 
 Mass Book," " Merita Missae," etc. Edited by the Rev. 
 Walter Howard Frere, D.D. Price [^\. 10/. 
 
 Ill and IV. Pontifical Services, vols, i and ii. Two large folio 
 volumes containing Descriptive Notes and a Liturgical Intro- 
 duction by the Rev. Walter Howard Frere, D.D., and 20 
 plates of 62 Illustrations from Miniatures of the XVth and 
 XVIth centuries. Price ^^i, 10;. each. 
 
 V. Dat Boexken vander Missen. (The Booklet of the Mass.) 
 
 By Gherit vander GouDE, 1507. 34 woodcuts illustrating 
 the Celebration of the Holy Communion, described, and the 
 explanatory text of the Flemish original translated, with illus- 
 trative excerpts from contemporary missals and tracts by the 
 Rev. Percy Dearmer, D,D. Price j^i. \s. 
 
 VI. The Edwardian Inventories for Bedfordshire. Edited 
 by F. C, Eeles, F.R.Hist.S., F. S.A.Scot., from transcepts by 
 the Rev, J. E. Brown, B.A. Price 5^. 
 
 VII. The Edwardian Inventories for Huntingdonshire. 
 
 Edited by Mrs. S. C. Lomas, editor of "State Papers Charles I 
 Addenda," etc., from transcripts by T. Craib. Price 10/. 
 
 VIII. Pontifical Services, vol. iii. Descriptive Notes and 143 
 Illustrations from woodcuts in pontificals of the XVIth 
 century. Edited by F. C. Eeles, F.R.Hist.S., F.S.A.Scot. 
 Price j^i. IX. 
 
 IX. The Edwardian Inventories for Buckinghamshire. 
 
 Edited by F. C. Eeles, F.R.Hist.S., F.S.A.Scot., from 
 transcripts by the Rev. J. E. Brown, B.A. Price ^^i. i/. 
 
 X. Fifty Pictures of Gothic Altars. Descriptive Notes and 
 50 Illustrations. Edited by the Rev. Percy Dearmer, D.D. 
 Price [^\. \i. 
 
 XII. Pontifical Services, vol. iv. Descriptive Notes and 1 34 
 Illustrations from woodcuts in pontificals of the XVIth cen- 
 tury. Edited by Athelstan Riley, M.A. Price j^i. \s. 
 
 iii
 
 XIII. A History of the Use of Incense in Divine Worship. 
 
 XX + 404 pp. 60 Illustrations. ByE.G.CuTHBERT F. Atchley, 
 L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. Price £7,. 
 
 XIV. Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the Period of 
 
 the Reformation, vol. i. An Introduction on the theory, 
 history, and practice of Episcopal and other Visitations. By 
 the Rev. Walter Howard Frere, D.D. Price £\. 
 
 XV. The Same, vol. ii (1536-58). Edited by the Rev. W. H. 
 Frere, D.D., with the assistance of W. M, Kennedy, M.A. 
 Price 30/. 
 
 XVI. The Same, vol. iii (1558-75). Edited by the Rev. W. H. 
 Frere, D.D. Price 30/. 
 
 XVII. Traditional Ceremonial and Customs connected with 
 
 the Scottish Liturgy. By F. C. Eeles, F.R.Hist.S., 
 F.S.A.Scot. Price i; I. 
 
 XVIII. The Rationale of Ceremonial, 1540-1543, with Notes 
 
 and Appendices and an Essay on the Regulation of Ceremonial 
 during the reign of King Henry \^III. By C. S. Cobb, 
 M.A., B.C.L. Price 10/. 
 
 XIX. Illustrations of the Liturgy. Thirteen drawings of the 
 Celebration of the Holy Communion in a parish church. 
 By Clement O. Skilbeck. With Notes descriptive and 
 explanatory, an Introduction on " The Present Opportunity," 
 and a Preface on the English and American Uses. By Rev. 
 Percy Dearmer, D.D. Price 4/. 6d. net. 
 
 TRACTS 
 
 I. Ornaments of the Rubric. (Third Edition.) By J. T. 
 MiCKLETHWAiTE, F.S.A. Price 5/. 
 
 II. Consolidation. (Second Edition.) By the Rev. W. C. E. 
 
 Newbolt, M.A., Canon and Chancellor of S. Paul's. Price \s. 
 
 III. Liturgical Interpolations. (Second Edition.) By the Rev. 
 
 T. A. Lacey, M.A. [Out of print.'] 
 
 IV. The Parish Clerk and his right to read the Liturgical 
 
 Epistle. By E. G. Cuthbert F. Atchley, L.R.C.P., 
 M.R.C.S. [Out of print.'] 
 
 V. A First English Ordo : A Celebration of the Lord's 
 Supper with one Minister, described and discussed 
 by some members of the Alcuin Club. Price zs. ; 
 or is. in stiff paper covers. 
 
 iv
 
 VI. The People's Prayers : Being some considerations on 
 the use of the Litany in Public Worship. By E. G. 
 
 CuTHBERT F. Atchley, L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. Price \i. 6d. ; 
 or 6d. in paper covers. 
 
 VII. The Sign of the Gross in the Western Liturgies. By 
 
 the Rev. E. E. Beresford Cooke. Price is. dd. 
 
 VIII. The "Interpretations" of the Bishops and their 
 Influence on Elizabethan Policy. By V/. M. Kennedy, 
 M.A. Price \s. 6d. 
 
 IX Prayer Book Revision : The "Irreducible Minimum." 
 
 Edited by Athelstan Riley, M.A. Price is. net. 
 
 X. The Bread of the Eucharist. By the Rev. R. Maxwell 
 WooLLEY, B.D. With I I Illustrations. Price 4/. 6d. net. 
 
 XI. English or Roman Use. By E. G. P. Wyatt, M.A. 
 Price is. net ; cheap edition, 3</. net. 
 
 PRAYER BOOK REVISION 
 PAMPHLETS 
 
 I. Liturgical Interpolations and Prayer Book Revision. 
 
 By the Rev. T. A. Lacey, M.A. Price is. ; or in paper 
 covers, 6d. 
 
 II. The Liturgical Gospels. By the Rev. W. H. Frerk, D.D. 
 
 Price is. 6d. ; or in paper covers, is. 
 
 Reduced Prices. — Members can obtain, through the Secretary, some 
 of the first Collections at a third of the original price, and other 
 publications at a reduction. 
 
 Lantern Slides. — A varied selection of slides for lectures can be 
 borrowed from the Club. Further particulars on application. 
 
 For all information apply to Miss Ward, 20 Antrim Mansions, 
 Hampstead, N.W. 
 
 Publishers. — Messrs. A. R. Movi^bray & Co. Ltd., 28 Margaret Street, 
 London, W., and 9 High Street, Oxford.
 
 FORTHCOMING PUBLICATIONS 
 
 Further Collections will be selected from the following : — 
 
 Ottery St. Mary. By Canon Dalton. \^In preparation.'] 
 
 Academical and Clerical Dress. By the Rev. F. E. Brightman, 
 
 [^In preparation.'] 
 
 New and larger edition of Collection I. English Altars, by Dr. 
 St. John Hope. [In preparation.] 
 
 Scottish Liturgical Services of the X\'IIIth century. Forms for 
 ordination, etc., drawn up by Scottish Bishops. \_In preparation.] 
 
 English Altars II. From the Reformation to 184.0. A collection 
 of pictures uniform with No. i. [In preparation.] 
 
 The Edwardian Inventories for Exeter. 
 
 The following Tracts are also proposed : — 
 
 The Ceremonial connected with the Consecration of the Eucharist. 
 
 The Carthusian Rite. 
 
 The Ancient Use of London. 
 
 The Liturgical Colours. 
 
 Examples of Church Plate and Metal Work. The Eucharistic 
 Vestments : examples from various sources. The Occasional 
 Services.
 
 PRINTED BY A, R. MOWBRAY AND CO. LTD. 
 LONDON AND OXFORD
 
 'JCVJlJfHIHfJHlMijrjALlj 
 
 BRARY FACILITY 
 
 AA 000 928 035 
 
 University of California 
 
 SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 305 De Neve Drive - Parking Lot 17 • Box 951388 
 
 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095-1388 
 
 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed. 
 
 iOCT 6 2008
 
 
 
 M 
 
 ^1 
 
 u