Library of V J-^ V \y-\-^.<^ U^ ^ ^\i^J V >\ - : / STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. BY MARY D. SHELDON, Bfil^NES rORMBRLT PROFESSOR OP HISTORY IN WELLE8LET COLLEGE, AND TEACHER OF HISTORY IN OSWEGO ' NORMAL SCHOOL, N.T. 2Dead)er*!a; JHanuaL ■ It is impossible that the history of any state should possess any interest unless it show some sort of development." — J. R. Seeley. BOSTON: D. C. HEATH & COMPANY. 189(>. • • • • "• • • •" • COPTRIOHT, Fbb. 11, 1888, Bt MARY SHELDON BARNES. EDUCATION DEPT, Nortoooti )9rt00 : J. S. Gushing & Co. — Berwick & Smith. Boston, Mass., U.S.A. TO My best of Masters, This book is most gratefully dedicated. 543094 PREFACE. THEY say my " Studies" are hard, and I am glad to hear it, for so in truth they should be, since history itself is hard. Our text-books in this subject have been mostly manuals of the results of this study, presented in more or less attrac- tive literary form. They have given no chance for any genuine work ; and yet the study of history demands most serious work ; like mathematics, it involves logic ; like language, it demands analysis and fine discrimination of terms ; like science, it calls for exact observation ; like law, it needs the cool, well-balanced judgment ; beyond all these, it requires the highest, fullest use of the sympathetic imagination. In fact, no study is more dif- ficult ; none calls more completely on all the mental powers, ijone affords the mind more generous play. It is indeed easy to read and then repeat: "Magna Charta laid the foundation of English liberty " ; " The Athenian peo- ple were brave, patriotic, magnanimous, and highly-cultured " ; "The government of Lewis XIV. was arbitrary, corrupt, un- just, extravagant " ; but to read, or even to learn such sen- tences as these by heart, is not to study, or even to touch the study of history ; these are mere statements of the results of historical research ; before he can name his work " study," the pupil must have found out some results for himself, by exercis- ing his own powers upon the necessary "raw material" of history ; let him read Magna Charta ; let him see the Athenian people in action in their contemporary world ; let him have the facts of French organization and administration under Lewis XIV. ; let him look, and look again, like Agassiz* famous pupil at the fish, until he sees the essential spirit, purpose, or character displayed within these words and deeds and figures ; thus he becomes a genuine student. By such practice, he • ''* Vi ' • * • * PKEFACE. learns, as a practical historian, to interpret social and political forms and facts, as the biologist learns to interpret living organisms by the actual dissection of a few typical forms, or as the mathematician fits himself to wrestle with new complica- tions by conquering well-set, formal problems ; in each case, actual work is done ; and nought but actual work knits us to reality. In teaching history in higher grades, three points must always be in mind : first, to give each student independent work ; next, to subject the results of solitary, individual thought to the freest criticism and discussion in the class-room ; last of all, the accepted results of tlie collective labor must be arranged in compact and logical order, and stowed away in memory. By the solitar}' study of the individual, the mind gains power and originality ; by the " free lance in a free field " of class-room work, the mind gains courage, sharpness, speed, and generous temper ; by the strict, close sifting of stu^iy and discussion, it gains concentration, clearness, and breadth. This mode of instruction is, in its essence, the famous *^ Seminary" method, first employed in Germany, and of late introduced into our own leading colleges. To render its advan- tages available for large classes with limited libraries, and a limited course of historical stud}', I have made these two books : the Student's edition contains the material and the problems for independent study ; the Teacher's Manual contains the answers to these problems, embodied in tabulations, and a running com- mentary' of text, which may serve as suggestive for the discus- sions and the summaries demanded by the class-room. As for the advantage of this method to the teacher, I can only say that I can but hope it will save him the tedium of the treadmill ; that it will bring him day by day the living, sympa- thetic touch of youthful thought and feeling; and that, in time, the world may read with fairer, clearer meaning to himself. MARY SHELDON BARNES. TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGS Preface v-vi Civilized World Before 776 B.C 1-7 Introductory 1-3 A. Study on Egypt 3-4 B. Study on Tigro-I^uj^rates Valley .... 5 C. Study on Phoenicia 6 D. Study on Judsea . . ^ r 7 Hellas .....* 8-35 A. Study on Heroic Age 9-13 B. Study on Historic Greece 13-21 C. Study on the Persian Wars 21-27 D. Study on the Athenian Leadership ; Age of Perikles . 27-33 E. F. Study on Period 431-338 33-35 The Hellenistic, or Alexandrian Conquests and King- doms . . . . 36-39 Rome 39-83 Introductory 39-40 A, B.l. Study on Regal Rome and Prse-Punic Republic . 41-46 B. II. Study on Republican Rome, Punic Period . . 46-52 B. III. Study on Republican Rome, Post-Punic Period . 53-58 C. I. Study on Pagan Empire, Augustus to Diocletian . 58-65 Teutonic Barbarians before 476 a.d 65-68 C. II. Christian Empire, Constantine to Charlemagne . 68-83 A. Christian Empire under Roman Control . . 69-75 B. and C. The West under Barbarian Control ; Empire of Charlemagne . 76-83 Vlll TABLE OF CONTENTS. PASS European History, 814-1880 84-167 Introductory 84-85 A. Early Mediaeval Period; Charlemagne to the Cru- sades, 814-1095 86-94 B. Study on Crusading Period 94-100 C. Study on Later Mediaeval Period .... 100-114 D. Renaissance and Reformation Era .... 115-127 E. Modern Europe 128-167 L The "Old Regime," 1648-1789 . . . . 128-140 Aa, In Europe in General .... 128-134 Ah. In France 134-140 II. French Revolution and Wars of Napoleon . 141-149 French Revolution 141-144 Napoleonic Rule . . . . . . 145-146 Prussian Revolution 146-149 III. The Nineteenth Century 150-167 In General 150-162 Special Study on Germany .... 162 Special Study on Italy 162-166 Socialism 166 STUDIES IN GENEEAL HISTORY. Eeacijer's iWanual. STUDIES IN GENEEAL HISTORY. [N.B. — All page references are to the Students' Edition.] THE CIVILIZED WORLD BEFORE 776 B.C. Before the " Studies " are begun at all, the teacher should have a preliminary discussion of the meaning of the word " civilization." I have found it a very good plan to give the students for the first day's lesson this requirement for home work, — "Make a list of all the reasons you have for calling yourselves civilized." You will find when the answers are brought the next day that you have plenty of material for dis- cussion and analysis. Since the greatest masters hesitate to define the word civilization, it will probabty be best in the class-room work simply to aim at some general, but clear ideas, which may strengthen and elucidate its meaning. The material brought by the pupils in answer to your question will probably enable you to make some such anal3'sis as follows : — CIVILIZATION. Proofs of. Houses, clothing, furniture, etc. Railroads, roads, telegraphs, post-offices, etc. Books, pictures, schools, etc. Churches, societies, etc. The family and the home, etc. Government, courts of law, etc. Directions of. Material, industrial, and commercial. Intellectual and aesthetic. Religious. Social. Political. Present Area of European (progressive) Civilization. ;2! :■;';.'.'; ■ : bttoies in general history. In discussing the present area of European (or Aryan) civilization, the teacher may ask the pupils how this civilization is different from that of China and India, and note that Euro- pean civilization is marked by progress as opposed to immo- bility. With some classes of pupils it may not be amiss to ask what classes of people in Europe and America are most civil- ized, requiring some proof for the answer given, and calling attention to the fact that in the most civilized countries, civili- zation in its higher directions is most widely diffused among all classes, although even in these countries, it is far from being equally so. This whole discussion should be treated simply and largely, giving room and freedom for all opinions, without any anxiety for particularly close or definite results, which are indeed un- desirable in dealing with such a subject. The pupils are now ready for the questions on p. 3. They will note that Egypt, the Tigro-Euphrates valley, Phoenicia, and Judaea, were each so protected from easy invasion, b}' mountains, rivers, deserts, and seas, and at the same time so fortunate in climate and so easily supported by agriculture or commerce, that men in these countries could devote a part, at least, of their time and strength to the various arts of civilization. This Oriental civilization would first enter Europe in the South, both because here Europe is easily reached from the East, and fairly protected from invasion, being peninsular southward and guarded by mountain-barriers northward. If there be time, it will be interesting just here to notice the various modern states of Europe and see how far their political boundaries have natural defenses, Prussia being a very good example of a state without, and England of a state with, natu- ral boundaries. If the pupils have difficulty in seeing that civilization will grow fastest where the protection from inva- sion is greatest, other things being equal, simply ask them to name some of the things which civilized people make and do, and they will soon see that time and quiet, and therefore a cer- tain amount of peace, are necessary to civilization. This STUDY ON EGYPT. 3 point being made, they are ready to see how the deserts and mountains, rivers and seas, were so placed as to allow an early civilization along the Nile and Euphrates valleys, while their fertile soil, capable of feeding thousands with little toil, gave whole classes leisure for varied industries. It has been sug- gested to me, moreover, that the rivers that traverse these great valleys made an easy means of communication between the various parts of their respective lands, — a point of great importance. A. STUDY ON EGYPT. The answers given to the questions on pp. 7 and 15, and on p. 3 concerning Egypt, may be summarized as follows : — EGYPT, 4000 (?) -1250 (?) B.C. Natural Advantages for Early Civilization. Protection from invasion by desert. seas. Abundance of food easily procured, by reason of climate. fertile soil. level surface. annual inundation of the Nile. Easy internal communication by means of the Nile. Organization of Society (Oriental) : aristocratic, theocratic, and monarchic, centred at Memphis and Thebes : — King : ruler, general, builder, ^ Priests : scholars, authors, and officials, >■ land-owners. Nobles : soldiers and officials, ) Common people : traders and artizans : embalmers, stone-cutters, engravers, jewellers, scribes, carpenters, cabinet-makers weavers, potters, glass-makers, etc., etc. Serfs, slaves, and captives: worked the land and served in the household, hewed and carried the stone, and made the brick for great public works. 4 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Egypt. — Continued. CharacteristicB of People and Civilization. Political : absolutism; centralization of industrial, religious, and political life in the king, supported by land-owning privileged classes. Social: inequality. Industrial : high material development. Moral : obedience and kindne'ss most admired, standard of morality high. Religious : polytheistic nature-worship, with monotheistic tendencies, absolute trust in immortality, belief in the ability of the gods to help men. close union of religion with the state, as shown in — importance of temples and privileges of priests, sacredness of king. Intellectual : attainment of culture in — literature. mathematics; geometry, astronomy, medicine, great inequality of culture. Esthetic : admiration for solidity and size. Enduring Remains of Civilization. Monuments : pyramids, temples. Objects of fine and industrial art : sculpture, jewelry, etc. Knowledge : geometrical, mathematical, medical. Literature : theology, morals, poetry, fiction, historic records. In summarizing these results the teacher will find it necessary perhaps to give such terms as Oriental, monarchic, aristocratic, theocratic, absolutism, polytheism, monotheism, but in each case he should first give the pupils themselves the chance to apply the term. And when given, the word should be defined as exactly as possible by the pupils, in order that the teacher may be sure of its being understood in its application. STUDY ON THE TIGRO-EUPHEATES VALLEY. 5 B. STUDY ON THE TiaEO-EUPHEATES VALLEY. This study may be summarized as follows : — TIGRO-EUPHRATES VALLEY. Natural Advantages for Early Civilization. Same as in Egypt, the Tigris and Euphrates taking the place of the Nile. Organization of Society. Similar to that of Egypt (Oriental). Characteristics of People and Civilization. Political and Social : as in Egypt, but centred at Babylon and Nineveh. Industrial : similar to that of Egypt. Moral ; admiration for power, desire of wealth. Religious : polytheistic belief. belief in the power of the gods in human affairs, close union of religion with the state. Intellectual : attainment of culture in literature, mathematics, astronomy, inequality of culture. Esthetic : admiration for the rich and brilliant. Enduring Remains. Objects of industrial art. Astronomical knowledge. Historic records (clay cylinders). Reliefs and sculptured figures of deities.^ In summarizing B^ particular attention should be called to the fact that the king is very positively the centre, not only of religious, but of industrial and intellectual life ; in fact, the king, his palaces and temples, embody and include the civiliza- tion of Babylon and Nineveh. * The object of the stone lions and bulls was not so much aesthetic as protective, magic qualities evidently being ascribed to them. (See p. 18.) 6 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. a STUDY ON PHCENIOIA. In this study the trade and commerce of the Phoenicians must be emphasized, and the pupils will see that ship-building, navi- gation, and some manufactures are necessary to a people living by trade ; that the Phoenicians would find the best markets among civilized peoples, whose wants were greatest, and that by virtue of their occupation they were at once the greatest learners and the greatest teachers of antiquity : on the one hand, observ- ing the geography, the manners and customs, the arts and industries of all the people among whom they traded ; on the other, diffusing this knowledge by interchanging from land to land the various products of the Mediterranean basin. There is much proof that through their agency civilization began to urge its way into Europe along the line of the Greek coasts and islands. Summarize as follows : — PHCENICIA. Natural Advantages of Position. Protected from invasion by mountains and the sea. On the road from Egypt to Mesopotamia. Character of People and Culture. Industrial and commercial, centring in coast cities of PhcB- nicia, and in trading-posts (colonies). Great variety of occupations, as in Egypt and Mesopotamia, adding navigation, ship-building, lumbering, and mining ; slave-dealing, dyeing, ivory-carving. Enduring Remedns of Civilization. Objects of industrial art throughout Mediterranean region (glass, pottery, metal-work). Knowledge of navigation, its methods, and routes.^ The leading Alphabets. In discussing the general questions on p. 25, let the interpre- tation of answers be very generous, simply maintaining this point : that the Oriental civilizations were prominently material, with germs of higher types appearing in their midst. 1 The finding of tin for bronze was, according to Lenormant and Cheral' lier, one of the chief aims of PhccDician commerce. STUDY ON JUD^A. 7 D. STUDY ON JUDllA. In this study the teacher will of course be careful to work entirely from the historical standpoint, avoiding an}" possible theological or sectarian discussion. I have taken special pains to present Judaea just as I have presented Egypt or Phoenicia, in order that the student may see its historical relations. The following summary may be useful as a guide : — JUD^A. Advantages of Position. Protected from invasion by mountains, deserts, and the sea. Vicinity to Phoenicia and Egypt. Organization of Society : theocratic, monarchic. Characteristics of People and Culture. Political : close union of church and state. predominance of priestly and prophetic influence. Religious : monotheism, mixed with polytheism. close relation of religion and practical life. Moral : high moral standard imposed by faith. great admiration for mercy and justice. Enduring Remains of Civilization. The monotheistic faith. Books of the Old Testament. With the material easily accessible in the Old Testament, the teacher may, if he thinks it desirable, carry this study still fur- ther, and note that the Jews were eminently a race of shepherds, farmers, warriors, and priests, with a serious, poetic tempera- ment easily seen in all their literature. In discussing the answers to the questions on p. 29, the teacher should allow the utmost freedom of opinion, simply requiring that any position taken should be sustained by facts. It is well to allow the pupils to feel that oftentimes there is a reasonable difference of opinion, while at the same time he should be led to understand that only those opinions are respect- 6 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. able which have some sound basis in realit3-. Thus, while there can hardly be a question but that among the Jews, the pure and upright priest, or the righteous valiant king were the popular ideals, and that among the Assyrians wealth was regarded above all things, it may very justly be questioned whether piety or power was the ruling ideal among the Eg3^ptians ; probably both ideals should be admitted. The following questions and topics are given as suggestions for essays or for dictation for examination : — What can a watch teach us of its makers ? What characteristics of Egyptian art still strike us as admirable ? Aside from religion, name two or three points in which our civilization is superior to that of the Egyptians. What can the Temple of Solomon teach us historically ? The greatness of Rameses. The palace of Sargon. The Phoenician sailor. The captive Jew in Babylon. Our Oriental debt. HELLAS. STUDY ON MAP OF GREECE. After the preliminary study of the map of Europe, the pupils will easily answer the questions on the geography of Greece, and will see that while agriculture and grazing may be found throughout the countr}', Laconia is especially fitted for agricul- ture, Arcadia for grazing, while Attica, adapted to fishing and Tnining, most naturally invites, by its position, the trade of Asia and the islands. As for the actual relations of Greece and the civilization of -Asia and Egypt, the myths (see pp. 33 and 34) indicate that Greece owed her start in civilization to the older countries. From the answers given by the pupils the teacher summarizes somewhat as follows : — GREECE. Geographic Advantages. Small states with natural defences. ; Eastward opening harbors. STUDY ON HEROIC AGE. Vicinity to older civilizations. Vicinity of eastward leading islands. Insular and temperate climate. Variety of products, .*. ^ Variety of occupation. Agriculture (Laconia). Fishing, grazing (Arcadia). Quarrying, mining, trade (Attica). A. STUDY ON HEROIO AGE ; HOMERIO GKEEOE. The teacher should not undertake to summarize any of the work in A until the studies on pp. 37, 39, 42, and 46 have been thoroughly mastered and discussed ; he may then tabulate as follows : — A. HOMERIC GREECE. Peculiar Institutions. Amphictyony : Bound together by kinship and faith. Amphictyonic Council : Religious league, with Delphic Oracle as its centre. Political Organization (Monarchic). King: Leads in council. Leads in war. Law-giver and priest. Supported by plunder, gifts. produce of his own lands, sale of war-captives as slaves. Council of Elders : Advises and persuades king, people. Hears proposals. Judges the people. 1 .♦. = therefore, wherever used. 10 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Homeric Greece. — Continued. General Assembly of people (Agora; market-place meeting): Hears announcements of king and princes. Expresses public opinion by shouting (approval), by silence (disapproval). Social Organization : Aristocratic and patriarchal, consisting of Classes : Nobles ; chiefs. Freemen (common people). Slaves bought, stolen, captured. Patriarchal,^ monogamic families. Characteristics of Civilization. Political : Participation of all free men in the government. Value of public opinion. Social : Patriarchal power tempered toward women by public opinion, religion, affection. Slavery, mild. Amusements, healthful and developing, consisting of physical contests, music, dancing, story-telling. Habits of equality, simplicity, hospitality. Industrial and commercial : Sources of material civilization, — Oriental, notably Phoe- nician and Egyptian. Great variety of occupation and interest (see list of gods, p. 36). Eapid growth of trade between various parts of Greece, encouraged by easy water communication and varied productions. * In the case of the absence or death of the father, the son takes his place, as in the case of Telemachus. STUDY OK HEROIC AGE. 11 Religious : Belief, polytheistic and anthropomorphic, — Gods thought to be immortal . of superhuman power, subordinate to Zeus. influential and interested in human affairs, persuaded by hymns, sacrifices, prayers, obedience. Future life regarded as shadow of the present, undesirable and gloomy. Close relation of religion and life. Intellectual and sesthetic : Cultivation of music and poetry through religion. Beginning of sculpture and architecture. Permanent Remains of Homeric Age. Homeric poems : Iliad and Odyssey. Fortifications at Mycenae, in the Troad, and at other pre- historic sites. Objects of industrial work (pottery, metal-work) found at above sites. The teacher may find that the work on the Homeric age occupies what seems a disproportionate part of his time. My own experience has proved to me that a sloio and thorough be- ginning made here pays^ and that time is actually made by lei- surely conscientious work at the opening. In looking over the summary, the teacher must realize that the mind of the pupil for the first time entering history, finds many new and great ideas to assimilate ; fundamental ideas, also, several of them asso- ciated with new and difficult terms, with which he needs to be familiar through all his work. I cannot sufficiently empha- size this point. In the Amphictyony, for instance, he meets with a thoroughly characteristic organization of antiquity, namely, a society held ,12 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTOKY. together by the bonds of a common faith, and a common kinship, real or assumed. He should be helped to understand it by reference to the Scottish clans, and to the churches and families of his own vicinity. By such reference he may be led to imagine the strength and value of these ancient bonds of union, as giv- ing real fighting power. In the political and social organization he should clearly apprehend in its large and simple features the little aristocratic state, where neither the king nor the slave is far removed from the mass of freemen ; by comparing the size of the Greek states with that of Egypt or Assyria, he will readily see that in a small state the king cannot easily remove himself from the very presence of the people and the consequent pressure of their opinions in regard to his actions ; while such a small state cannot well enrich itself nor its king by any other means than those of honest labor, since it cannot seize upon the wealth acquired by larger powers. Special pains should be taken that the Agora, or General Assembly, is understood as the actual democratic meeting of all adult freemen in the market- place, on any occasion when the presence of the whole people is required, either to give notice of an expedition or a danger or to announce a law ; the imagination should be stimulated to con- ceive clearly of a state of affairs where all common news comes by hearsay, and all common interests must be discussed by word of mouth ; in short, of days when there was neither a newspaper, a telegraph, nor a post-office. The importance of the Agora as the safeguard of liberty will then appear double, and it will be clearly perceived that it was the oi-gan of public opinion. The point may be illustrated by the meeting of boys in the play- ground to talk over some common project or expedition. In discussing amusements, great stress should be laid on their admirable effect in developing physical and artistic excellence. In studying religious characteristics, note that the gods are like men : (a) Physically ; they have the parts of the human body, and feel physical needs, {h) Emotionally ; they hate, ;^ear, love, (c) Socially ; they also live in the patriarchal st3'le. la other words, the Greek gods are of the complete anthro- STUDY OF HISTORIC GREECE. 13 pomorphic type. Although itself below the more spiritual and ideal type of the Hebrew Deity, it may be well to note in passing its superiority to the conceptions of Egypt or Assyria in its influence on human life. So far as possible, the joyous nature of the worship, and its influence on the temper of the people, should be emphasized. In general, the Greek migrations are southward and east- ward ; the early movement toward Thessaly is perhaps explained by its comparative size and fertility. Topics and Questions for Examinations and Essays. — What is the historic value of the Homeric poems ? A comparison of Homeric Greece and of the Jews in patriarchal times (Abraham and Ulysses) . What was the probable, and what was the certain, influence of the Trojan War on civilization? What traces of nature-worship in the Greek mythology, and what evidences of divine power seen in each of the natural objects thought to be under special divine dominion ? A scene at the Lion-gate of Mycenae, 1000 b.c. Agamemnon's departure from Mycenae. What points of resemblance between the Greek and Jewish faith ? What fundamental difference ? B. STUDY OF HISTORIO GREECE, OR HELLAS, 776-500. The map, pp. 44, 45, at once reveals that the Greeks were of essentially maritime habit, settling the coasts of every richly productive land within their reach, while their locations at river-mouths and on easily accessible shores show that their colonies were in reality trading-posts. The varied produc- tions of the Greek lands and the varied occupations of the Greek people encouraged the calling of the merchant and sailor, while at the same time it scattered the Greeks here and there along the fertile Mediterranean coasts, preventing any. strong political or territorial unity, but making them a strong civilizing force among the barbarous nations. 14 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. The whole study on p. 47 should be treated very freely and conversationally, a number of the questions admitting of more than one answer. Here, if he has not done so before, the teacher should impress upon the pupils that, to early traders, the water-ways are by far the easiest, cheapest, and safest roads for travel and commerce. So far as it is desirable to summarize the answers to these questions, they will be found embodied in the following general tabular view of B. 1 : — GENERAL HELLENIC DEVELOPMENT, 776-4%. Organizations and Institutdons of Period. Colonies : trading-posts, imited to mother-cities by kinship and worship. Aristocratic tribal states : examples, Sparta, Attica ; bonds of union, common descent (kinship) and worship. Olympic games,^ forming the centre of a loose religious Hel- lenic union (c/. Delphi). CharacteristicB of Period. Growth of colonies and commerce about Black Sea and Bosphorus {Byzantium). about iEgean. in Magna Graecia {Syracuse). Tendencies to Hellenic union seen in religion : games, — Olympic, Pythian, Nemean, etc. Delphic Oracle, amphictyonies. sacred war. language and literature ^ (Homer). ^ In reckoning Olympiads, it is to be remembered that the first Olym- piad does not count for four years ; and so, to find the date of the fifteenth Olympiad, one must multiply four by fourteen, instead of by fifteen, and subtract the result from 776 b.c. 2 If the pupils do not think of this, it may be well to remind them that all outsiders were called by the Greeks " Barbarians,'* that is, men who " babble/' or speak so that they cannot be understood. Tell them, too, that Homer web recited and sung in every city and village of Greece. STUDY OF HISTORIC GREECE. 15 Tendency to Spartan leadership seen in Olympic games. Spartan conquests. Lydian request for Spartan alliance. Revolt against oligarchy, ending in " tyranny." Intellectual, industrial, and artistic impulse seen in poetry (lyric). science {philosophy). architecture and sculpture. working in metal, stone, clay, developing along the lines of Greek life and history, .•. original and national. encouraged by religion. the " Tyrants." General diffusion of excellence throughout Greek settlements of Asia Minor and the Islands, among all free citizens. Strong influence of religion seen in Delphic Oracle, games. art and literature, founding of colonies. Ideals of the period : the gentleman. the athlete (victor at Olympia). the good and honored citizen, the poet, singer, and thinker. Type of civilization, — commercial, intellectual, artistic. All these points might also be summarized under the head- ings, political, social, religious, etc., and it might be well to ask the students so to arrange the various points as an exercise in classification. In general, it should be strongly impressed upon the mind of the pupil that the bonds of Greek union during this period were worship and kinship ; that these bonds not only united them in tribes, classes, cities, and araphictyonies, but that they 16 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. separated them from barbarians, the men of foreign speech and faith ; nor is it perhaps unsafe to follow Curtius in assigning great importance to the cohesive force exercised by the Delphic Oracle, which was a centre of knowledge as well as of faith. But no cohesive force could stand against the strength of local interests. It will be noted through this whole time that each little state, centred in its own little city, acted for itself, fought for itself, and founded its own colonies ; Sparta alone sometimes interfered in general Greek affairs, and thus asserted her superior strength. It will be readily perceived that all the tendencies and organ- izations of this period followed naturally from those of the Homeric age, with a strengthening of the commercial, relig- ious, and intellectual spirit. The heroes of the Trojan War and the Argonautic Expedition were the precursors of the adventurous traders and colonists ; and the men who never fought a battle but with the favor of the gods, the ancestors of those who founded their colonies by the advice of Apollo. B. II. 1. SPARTA, 776-490 B.C. Political Organization. In form : a limited monarchy. In reality : an oligarchic democracy, bound together by religion, kinship, and training. Social Organization. For {Spartans : communistic, and entirely subordinate to the state and the army. Results of the Lycurgan Organization and Institutions. Political : Spartan leadership in Greece for that period. Social : Subordination of the individual and the family to the state. Importance and influence of women. Simplicity, and even rudeness of manners. Personal : Scorn of any labor other than military. High physical development, — strength and l>eauty. Spai'tan ideal, — the warrior, athlete, and patriot. STUDY OF HISTORIC GREECE. 17 111 the above study, the phrase, " oligarchic democracy," may seem hke a gemiine " Irish bull," nor cau I say that I at all approve of it, since it is only clear to one who knows what it means. What it does mean is this, — that, while the Spar- tan body within itself was as pure a working democracy' as the world has ever seen, yet, since that bod}' was limited in num- ber, and ruled over a large population of Laconians, who had absolutely no share in the government, it was, as regarded these Laconians, an oligarchy ; and throughout the Greek his- tory it will be seen that the Spartan spirit and the Spartan sympath}^ is aristocratic. Even in this period, we find her always opposed to the man of the people, the " Tyrant." B. II. 2. ATHENS, 776-490 B.C. Before Solon, 776-594 B.C. Political organization : Aristocracy of clan-elders (Eupatrids), distinguished from other tribesmen by birth and worship. Social organization : Tribal, the people bound together by kinship and wor- ship into families, forming clans, in turn forming brotherhoods, in turn forming Four Ionic Tribes, political units of the City-state. [N.B. — Tribesmen alone form the state.] Changes of Solon, 594 B.C. In organization : Aristocracy of birth changed to a timocracy; that is, wealthy as well as high-born tribesmen admitted to power. Community of worship given to all tribesmen. Slavery for tribesmen abolished. Publicity and sacredness of common law. In tendency : Development of equality. Limitation of individual by the state. Liberation of individual from family. 18 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Athens. — Continued. Recognition of value of wealth and industry. Encouragement of labor and trade. Development of unity and freedom by loosening of the fixed bonds of birth, extension of a common worship. The PisiBtratid Tyranny (Demagogism). Organized according to forms of Solon's constitution. Based on local jealousies of Mountain, Plain, and Shore.^ personality of Pisistratus, — eloquence, geniality, tact and intellect, ignorance, sympathy, and superstition of the multitude, wealth of Pisistratus. hired military forces. Justified by public improvements in roads, trade, patronage of art, science, poetry. Caused to fall by abuse of the tyrannical power, reaction against it. ambition of the Alcma^onids. opposition of Delphi and Sparta. Changes of Clisthenes. In organization (^Democracy) : The kinship bond abolished in politics. ^ The tribe of demesmen replaces that of kinsmen in politics. The deme, or parish, instead of the family, becomes the fundamental unit, its men united by a common residence and a common worship. All free inhabitants become citizens. ^ The local jealousies, of course, were strong, because of local interests ; to this was added, in the case of the Mountaineers, the desperation of poor men who have nothing to lose. 2 In social life, of course the kinship bond always remains; and in Greece probably, as well as elsewhere, the "first families" had many things after " their way." STUDY OF HISTORIC GREECE. 19 tendency : Development of democracy. Development of unity by introduction of new worships, abolition of distinctions of birth between loniang and Perioeki. General Character of Athenian History, 776-490 B.C. Constant changes toward equality, democracy, and unity. Parallelism of political, social, and religious distinctions. Widening distribution of political power. Growth of the state in size, numbers, and interests. Gradual liberation of individuals. In this, the pupil meets with his first serious study of consti- tutional development, and the teacher should by no means be- grudge the time necessary to a complete understanding of each stage. The student must have clearly in mind that before the time of Clisthenes the four Ionic tribes form the Athenian state, without reference to the Metics, that the changes of Solon apply simply to Ionic tribesmen, and that in every development of the constitution the place and form of the old Greek bonds of union, kinship and faith, are still respected, though constantl}^ enlarged and loosened, while of these two the common worship is the stronger and gives presumptive evidence of common kin. While these ideas are in reality simple, yet their novelty makes them at first hard to " sense," and time is the one element necessary to their understanding. Thorough work here will save time in all the following constitu- tional studies. In Pisistratus, we have a study of that interesting phenome- non, the "man of the people" turned "Tyrant"; the most important point to discuss is the relation between the Tyrant, the ignorant mass, and the constitutional form ; and it should be clearly understood that a Tyrant of this type alvrays finds his counterpart in the ignorance or stupidity of his supporters, and that constitutional forms avail little without general intelli- gence to use them.^ To come no closer home, it will be well to 1 " I hold all Rome guilty of this Nero." — ThorndaU. 20 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. cite the parallel case of Napoleon III. The full-grown Tyrant, however, is a political teacher, and he never appeared twice in the same Greek state. In Athens, he called out the institution of ostracism, as local party conflicts forced into the constitu- tion the separation of the demes of the same tribe. In the constitution of Clisthenes we meet with the most radical constitutional change known to antiquity. Before his time, the men born into the same clan belonged together, no matter where they dwelt ; unity existed alone in faith and blood-relationship. But he drew neighbors together into the same parish, so that men who dwelt together irrespective of blood-relationship should be called by a common name and worship at a common shrine. In other words, he made the land, the common father-land^ the bond of unity. Though this was his fundamental change, he dared not ignore the old Greek bonds, and so gave to each of his new tribes, mixed of lonians and Metics, a local hero for common worship, from whom it took its tribal name, as if in direct descent. From this time on, then, we find Ionian and Ionic merged in the larger names of Athenian and Attic. Before the time of Solon the ''Homeric Assembly of Elders " had crowded out of power both the King and the body of freemen ; from Solon's time power is turned more and more into the channels of the *' agora." But throughout the consti- tutional development, we never lose sight of the primitive Homeric organization ; the magistrates replace the King, the Areopagus and the Senates replace the Assembly of Elders ; while the market-place meeting grows into a thoroughly com- pacted Ecclesia, with large and definite powers. Snggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — The landing of the Greeks in Illyria. Journal of a Greek sailing from Athens to Phasis. The importance of Byzantium. Which most strongly unites men, religion or commerce, and why? Why is common speech a bond of union? In what ways were the various contemporaneous nations and tribes real barbarians compared with the Greeks, 776- 500 B.C. ? A day at Olympia. Letter of a Milesian merchant from STUDY ON PERSIAN WARS. 21 Delphi. Was the Greek Tyrant a good or an evil? (Debate.) By what marks would you have known yourself in a Greek state had you been suddenly placed in Athens, 510 B.C., not knowing the language? What geographical fact accounted for the political con- figuration of Greece and its leading business interest? How far is Sparta a suggestive model ? Dialogue between a Spartan and Athe- nian. The civilizing forces at work, 600 B.C. What would have been the fate of Solon and Clisthenes respectively, had they changed places with each other in time, but not in principles? What lesson can we Americans draw from the story of Pisistratus ? C. STUDY ON PEESIAN WAES, 490-479 B.O. The study on p. 72 is so exceedingly easy that it may be well simply to make an informal conversation of it, without asking for any home study upon it. Its results, together with those of studies on pp. 76, 80, 82, 85, 87, may be summarized some- thing as follows : — GENERAL COMPARISON OF ANTAGONISTS. Hellenic. Persian. Territory is maritime, colonial, scat- agricultural, continental, com- tered, with natural divi- pact, with arbitrary divi- sions. sions. Population is of one race, speech, and mixed of many races, tongues. faith. and faiths. Civilization is Occidental ; that is, diffused. Oriental ; that is, centralized, exclusive. Governments democracy and local inde- despotism, centralization. tend to pendence. Soldiers are citizens fighting for their subjects fighting to gain more own possessions and inde- wealth for their king. pendence. [N. B. — This table can only be started after the study on p. 72 ; it must be extended and completed by means of the study on p. 76, where additional points are made. At its close, the clear impression 22 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. should be left on the mind of the pupil that the Persian empire was an enormous heterogeneous compound, massed together by conquerors as a great estate, from which to draw revenues and forces for their private ends ; while Greece, or Hellas, was a loose union of citizen- communities, bound together by common sympathies and modes of thought, but full of independent, individual life, each community existing and gathering resources for its own citizens.] FIRST PERSIAN WAR. Causes of the "War. Desire of Darius for wealth of Naxos and Athens. Desire of Darius to punish Athens. Desire of Hippias for restoration to power. Independence of Athens. Important Events of the War. Ionian revolt, and Athenian alliance with it. Persian invasion of Greece. Battle of Marathon, 490 b.c, won by Miltiades. 10,000 Greeks (Athenians) conquer 100,000 Persians. Retreat of Persians ; end of first war. Character, Relations, £ind Tendencies of the Hellenes, as shown in this "War. General tendency to democratic governments, seen in Naxos. cities of Asia Minor. Athens. Democracies opposed by aristocracies (Naxos). tyrants (Miletus, Athens). Darius (Ionian revolt). Leadership of Sparta and Athens among the Greeks. Love of independence (Sparta, Athens, Asia Minor). Special Athenian Characteristics displayed. Generous sympathy with Greece. Unselfish patriotism (conduct of generals). Unshrinking courage. Special Spartan Character shown. Strict observance of law (refusal to march). STUDY ON PERSIAN WARS. 23 INTERVAL FROM FIRST TO SECOND PERSIAN WARS, MARKED BY — Development of Athenian Naval Po-wer, through wisdom of Themistocles. patriotism of the Athenians, natural advantages of Athenian situation. Persian Preparations for invading Greece urged on by- Persian desire for revenge. Pisistratid ambition, marked by union of great masses under single lead, lack of any inspiration of patriotism, difficulty of provisioning. Attempted Union of Hellenes, incomplete through jealousy (Syracuse, Argos). fear (Corcyra). Nobility of Athenian Spirit, shown in patriotism for all Hellas (Pan-Hellenism), generosity of Themistokles to Aristeides. hoping against hope, — courage in extremity. SECOND PERSIAN WAR. [Add to the table of " Comparison of Antagonists " the point of " Spirit," — the Hellenic spirit being that of independence, giving strength ; the Persian, that of servility and fear, producing weakness.] Causes of "War (see second point under Interval). Critical Battles of the War. Thermopylae (hero Leonidas). Salarais (hero Themistocles). Platsea and Mycale. Character displayed in this "War, by — Spartans under Leonidas : Dogged courage. Absolute obedience to law, and regard for religion. Individual independence of a leader. Spartans in the fleet : Caution and selfishness. 24 STUDIES IN GENERAL HLSTORY. Second Persian War. — Continued. Athenians (including Themistocles and Aristides): Regard for the gods. Good judgment (statesmanship). Strategy (Themistocles). Unselfish patriotism (Aristides, Plataea). Pan-Hellenic interest. Greeks in general : Regard for the gods. Love of independence. Tendencies to local and party jealousies. Regard for Sparta and Athens as leaders. Consciously united by religion (Delphi). speech. blood. Led by persuasion. Persian hosts : Cowardice. Dependence on leaders and on fear (scourge). In the previous studies, we have seen the development of the Spartan and Athenian constitutions into their completed forms ; in the Persian wars, we see these completed forms at work, acting in large and various circumstances. Up to this point, the aim of our work has been thoroughly to understand forms ; now it must be thoroughly to feel the spirit, the life which animates them ; furthermore, to note how far the}^ meet, and when they fail to meet the needs of the hour. Perhaps beyond all else, it should be noted that both Athenian and Spartan constitutions were good primarily because they were worked, b}' a mass in- deed, but by a mass composed of intelligent, self-reliant, patriotic individuals. We admire the heroism of the Spartans at Thermo- pylae, the patriotism of the Athenians in voting that their pub- lic moneys should be expended in a fleet, and again and again we marvel at the excellent judgment and courage shown in the decisions of the Greek assemblies ; but we must always remind the pupil that while the free constitution called forth the powers of the citizen, the intelligence of the citizen gave the free con- STUDY ON PERSIAN WARS. 25 stitution power. To enforce the point, let the student but once imagine that the Athenian Ecclesia was composed of ignorant, selfish men, many of them resident in Attica only for a year or two, and he will see at once that under such circumstances, the free constitution, acting in a time of war and danger, when the state demands the highest courage and the greatest sacri- fices, may become a source of positive injury. Further, let him note that when the Clisthenean arrangement of Strategi was tested for the first time at Marathon, this part of the constitu- tion would have failed entirely had it not been for the generosity of Aristides and his companions, joined to the wisdom and daring of Miltiades. Again, the advantage which the ostracism gave, in uniting the forces of the state under a single lead, depended for its value on the good sense of each Athenian citizen and his readiness to submit to law. Other instances will be seen throughout the period. In short, the working power of the Greek constitutions depended on the fact that they were worked by men, quick-witted, generous-hearted; every unit counted one. Throughout the study it must be kept in mind that the whole theory of Greek political life was, that persua- sion, the moving of men's thoughts and feelings by reasons and motives, is the only legitimate force by which either men or measures are lifted into leadership. Although during the Persian wars, the individuality of the various states stood strongly forth in distinct and local colors, yet it is to this period that we owe the first appearance of that political form so interesting to all Americans, — the union of independent states for concerted action in affairs of common interest. The Amphictyonies were religious in their motive, and the old Homeric league of chiefs in the Trojan war was perhaps too unconscious and informal to be reckoned as politi- cal. But during the Persian wars, we find the Greek states, under the urging power of Athens, striving, though weakly and with ill-success, to form a true Pan-Hellenic union against the Barbarian. The want of centralization must have been strongly felt when fighting against a foe, whose greatest strength lay in 26 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. his ability to handle masses simply and easily from an absolute, though despotic centre. The value of this power of centralized force in time of war should be as thoroughly understood as cir- cumstances permit, and receives fine illustrations from the risks which the Greeks ran from disunion in the second Persian war, notably at Salamis. In this power lies the strength of despot- isms ; in its lack, the weakness of free governments, unless for a time they know how to subject and consolidate themselves under a single will. It is interesting to note, also, in this con- nection, that Delphi became a more thoroughly acknowledged centre of Greek affairs, and in some cases was even recog- nized as able to hold the various states responsible for a com- mon agreement. At the close of the whole study on the Persian wars it will be well to call attention to the fact that the great deeds, that the great results of this period, were due entirely to moral and intellectual forces ; that the disastrous and complete defeat suffered by the Greeks at Thermopylae became through its moral grandeur, not only a glory but an inspiration ; and that the one state in Greece which displayed these qualities in the highest degree, namely Athens, not only deserved the leader- ship of the Hellenes, but obtained it. The geographical advantages of Thermopyhne and Salamis are in realit}' the same, since on the one hand the narrowness of the mountain-pass, and on the other, the narrowness of the straits, enabled a few brave men to keep at bay a multitude, whom they could only encounter a few at a time. Suggestions for Essay and Examination TATork. — It has always been my habit, in reaching this point in the work, to give the pupils a chance to try their own hand at the making of a tabulated summary. According to the ability and experience of the class, they can either be allowed to make it without any help or suggestion on the part of the teacher, or the principal headings may be dictated to them to fill out. In either case, the teacher should be exceedingly careful not to hold his students to any rigid form, but to allow as wide differences of arrangement as the " logic of events " allows. The following topics and questions are suggestive : — STUDY ON THE ATHENIAN LEADERSHIP. 27 What changes did the Persian wars produce in Hellas ? Were they a good or an evil? Was Aristeides or Themistokles the better citizen ? (Debate.) The military strength of goodness, as illustrated in these wars. Why is courage a cardinal virtue ? Persia v. Greece. The citizen v. the subject. The comparative influence of the aims of glory and wealth on character. The story of a soldier at Marathon ; at Thermopylae. "I perceive that, in all things, ye are too super- stitious." Journal of an Athenian citizen, 480-479 B.C. Why should the Greeks call ^^ Persuasion'' a goddess? The Greek victory at Thermopylae. D. STUDY ON THE ATHENIAN LEADEESHIP; AGE OF PEEICLES; 479-431. In dealing with the age of Pericles, it is generally too much ignored that we are studying, after all, the development of Athens alone ; and while for the time being it seems to concen- trate all Hellenic history within its own walls, yet it is but a single city among the Greeks. Hence, in the following tabula- tion, it has seemed best to emphasize this fact by considering Hellas in general, as well as Athens. No part of this summary should be given until all the work on the Athenian Leadership has been discussed ; and if the students have sufficient ability, it may be well here also to ask them to tabulate their own results, THE ATHENIAN LEADERSHIP; AGE OF PERICLES. Organization of Hellas in general : Local self-governing cities, with attempts at Hellenic union in Confederacy of Delos (maritime dominion), in Spartan leadership (continental dominion). Athens ; Completed democracy at home, with tendencies to dema- gogism. Imperialism abroad, under lead of Cimon. Pericles. 28 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. The Athenian Leadership. — Continued. Characteristics of Period in Hellas in general : Party strife within cities. Aristocrats favored by Sparta. Democrats favored by Athens. Jealousy of cities, notably of Athens, leading to Peloponnesian War. Development of Athenian leadership by superior naval force- Pan-Hellenic spirit. literary and artistic supremacy. Development of Athenian empire by neglect and indiiference of allies. Athenian ambition and strength. Athens : Development of trade and wealth. Development of arts, in original (Greek) directions. Sculpture > Parthenon. Architecture > Drama, — ^schylus. Sophocles. Euripides. General intelligence and patriotism shown in use of public nioney (Parthenon), character of drama and popular amusements, leading men of the state, — Aristides. Cimon. Pericles. Development of philosophy, — natural science, mentai and moral philosophy, theology. Growth and influence of oratory. Ideals, — statesman and general, poet, philosopher, orator, good citizen ; or Ideal character, — cultured, brave, genial, patriotic, eloquent. Production of great men, — Pericles, Socrates, Aris- tides, etc. STUDY ON THE ATHENIAN LEADERSHIP. 29 Existence of religious parties, — Liberal thinkers (Socrates). Orthodox Greeks (his prosecutors) ; or Growth of free thought, endangering the state, — Trial of Socrates. The instant the Persian wars are over, we find that the Hel- lenic world has widened, that its movements are larger, its wars and alliances farther-reaching than before. This is seen at once in the feeling that Sestos and Byzantinm are keys to the Greek world, and as such should be so held by Greeks as to prevent any repetition of the invasions of Darius and Xerxes. But it is seen most largely in the fact that from this time on, the Greek cities tend to appear in groups, under the lead of one or another. During this period, of course, it was the Athenian group that led ; in the beginning, the Confederacy of Delos was a free league of the older Greek type, in which Athens was simply the first among equals ; but a most noteworthy change soon oc- curred, in that the chief bond of union became that of a common interest. Again, this league was formed, not to meet a special crisis, but to carry out a settled purpose of conscious Hellenic union ; from this point of view, it was necessary that the members should be held responsible to some single member, or some cen- tral body. Hence, after the treasury was transferred to Athens, and the allies gradually allowed themselves to pay a money-tax, instead of performing active personal duties, we find them be- coming uneasy, and the stress of present danger over, Athens was compelled to hold them together by main force. Hence the Greek world became undermined by part}' strife, mutual jeal- ousy, and dislike, until the " logic of events " drove the states upon the Peloponnesian War. Yet, while the Confederacy of Delos failed of achieving a Greek political union, it must not be forgotten that it proved eflfective for the time being, in making the ^gean thoroughly Greek throughout its coasts and islandg. Nor must it be forgotten that Athens, at this time purely democratic, and under the most democratic leaders, was able to carry out a foreign polic}^ as energetic and decisive as 30 STUDIES IN GEKEEAL HISTORY. any despot. Only to the mind of Pericles does it seem to have occurred that it might be possible to apply the representative principle to Greek affairs in general, and so to form a demo- cratic union of states as well as one of citizens. While the list of great men and works shows very positively that Athens was the intellectual centre of Hellas, and that the Greek genius culminated in her free citizens, it also shows that the whole Greek world was pervaded by the same intellectual and artistic impulses ; and that these impulses always played about Greek forms and themes, so that the Greek history, mythology, and life, became the inspiration of the Greek art. Not only does a state express its own peculiar genius by original works of art, but also in living characters. Thus Leonidas and Themistocles were as distinctively products of Greek life, as the Venus of Melos or the Parthenon. In Athe- nian history many such type-characters have been preserved for us with all the freshness of their living deeds and words ; and of these, two predominate, — Pericles and Socrates. Pericles is, however, more typically Athenian, having the versatility which enabled him to be at once general, admiral, orator, statesman, scholar, artist, and gentleman. This versatility was rendered effective by a persistent will, a diligent use of time, and an upright character. His mode of life and habits of thought, his tastes and desires, were all Athenian, and thus he was chosen, year after year, as its representative man by the Athenian P^cclesia. He had moderation, wit, spirit, and, above all, that spherical development of the whole man, which he himself described (p. 106) as typically Athenian. If desired, the teacher may make some such tabulation as follows for the facts concerning Pericles : — Advantages of Pericles for Leadership. Honorable birth. Athenian training. Dignity of manner. Versatile tastes. Intellectual and oratorical talent. STUDY OK THE ATHENIAN LEADEESHIP. 31 Noble character, — upright. economical. firm. religious, without superstition. patriotic, public-spirited. merciful, kind. Means used by Pericles to acquire Leadership. Improvements A«rrought by Pericles. Although Socrates did not, like Pericles, gather up in his own person all the tendencies and influences of the Athenian history and culture, still he represents the culmination of one set of these tendencies and influences, and probably could not have lived and worked sympathetically with so large and enthu- siastic a following at any other time or place. The long course of Greek thought, which had dealt from the time of Homer with the larger problems of the destiny of man, the nature of the Deity, and the relation of each to the other and the exter- nal world, produced its consummate flower in the words and character of Socrates. Socrates may fairly be called a Pagan Christian, since we find in him not only the belief in a Deity who rules our lives, who can be reached by prayer, and who rewards the good and punishes the evil-doer, but also in him we find the hope of immortality, and, above all, the clear per- ception that the highest and most worthy life of man is spir- itual, and that purity, truth, and obedience to the gods are the noblest aims of existence. This being the teaching of Socrates, it has often seemed strange that he should have been deemed worthy of death by the Athenians. But, if we have hitherto interpreted Greek history aright, the pupil will readily see that, in the Athenian state, religious unity was essential to political, and that any freedom of thought which would tend to free men from allegiance to that oldest and strongest of Greek political bonds, the tribal and national faith, must seem fatal to the firmness of the state. Here we have a grave political reason, which must have seemed plausible to the Athenians of that S2 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. day, for the condemnation of Socrates; the more plausible, since the number of his sympathizers, judging from the votes cast, must have included a very large minority of the Athenian citizens. It may be said that this study of Socrates is misplaced, since, in point of time, he belongs in the period of the Pelo- ponnesian War. This fact caused me to hesitate before placing him with the men of the age of Pericles ; but, on the whole, he seemed properly to belong with that great group, each of which represents the culmination of a long ''stream of tendency." For a similar reason, though more doubtfully applied, the ex- tracts from Aristophanes are placed among those illustrative of this age. The extracts from the dramatists, taken in connection with the trial of Socrates and the life of Pericles, indicate that, in the refined Athens of that age, there were three distinct trends of religious thought : that of orthodoxy, or the holding by the material myth and the material faith ; that of skepticism or doubt ; and that of philosophic theology, personified in Socrates. That the third of these tendencies was regarded as more dan- gerous than the second may be easily explained by the fact that a positive, earnest belief has a strength which mere doubt can never possess. I am sorry that the necessary limit set at present to the expense of a text-book has made it impossible to illustrate more fully or perfectly the culmination of Greek art into sculpture and architecture. But with the specimens given, it may be noted that its products were simple, natural, well-proportioned and harmonious, full of living repose. SuggeBtions for Essay and Examination Work. — The great- ness of Pericles. The greatness of Socrates. What can the Parthenon tell us of Athens ? The Periclean v. The American. Indifference a political vice in a republic. The education of the Ecclesia. "In- spiration comes only to the disciplined"; illustrate from Athenian history and biography. The imperfections of the Athenian democracy. The political value of morality, illustrated from Athenian history and STUDY ON PERIOD 431-338. 33 biography. The visit of an Egyptian to Athens under Pericles. Pericles v. Pisistratu6. E. F. STUDY ON PEKIOD 431-338. The studies on pp. 115, 117, and 118 may be summarized as follows : — PELOPONNESIAN WAR, AND FALL OF GREECE BEFORE MACEDON. Characteristics of Period. Dependence of individual states on foreign aid. Persia. Macedon. Succession of Hellenic leaderships, or leagues, under Athens, — caused by naval and intellectual superiority. Sparta, — caused by superior military strength and foreign aid. Thebes, — caused by native patriotism and culture. Macedon, — caused by royal ambition, interference in Greek affairs, diplomacy. Mutual jealousies and constant wars. Gradual weakening of important states through lack of union (fault in organization), lack of Hellenic patriotism and local unselfishness (fault in spirit). General Characteristics of Hellenic History. Local individual development from conmion Homeric basis : Of constitutions, into tyrannies, democracies, aristocracies. . Of ideals, into statesmen, generals, poets, artists, philoso- phers. Of religion, into Socratic philosophy, popular superstition. The opening of the Peloponnesian War shows us the Greek world in all its relations within and without : two strong groups of states within, engaged in a long-threatened conflict, and repre- senting the opposing principles of aristocracy and democrac}^ as embodied in their leading cities ; these cities gradually weakened 34 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. and deserted by their allies, the strength of their respective con- federacies broken, and passing, in some measure, to Thebes ; meanwhile, the relation toward the barbarian had so far changed that Persia was enabled to interfere very effectively in Greek affairs, the Greek bitterness towards her being very mate- rially softened. The Persian sympathy was naturally at first against Athens, who had proved her most dangerous and persistent foe in the Persian wars ; but when Athens was weakened, the Asiatics attacked Sparta, and the whole Greek world was undermined by mutual jealousy and foreign intrigue. Philip of Macedon, therefore, found it comparatively easy to follow the lead of Persia, and to develop still further that policy of aiding one Greek state against another to the mutual injur}^ or ruin of both, while he himself held all his forces in his single hand, to obey his single will. If Athens had had the spirit to follow the lead of Demosthenes, and Greece the spirit to follow the one lead of Athens ; or if, in the preceding generation, Pericles had been able to form that Hellenic Union, which the best Athenians desired, then Greece might have become the leading power of the Eastern Mediter- ranean. But the maritime power of Athens had been thoroughly broken at iEgospotami, and with it her power of holding her old allies ; the influence of Persian gold was strong in Sparta and the smaller Grecian states ; neither the spirit nor the organization existed capable of resisting such a power as Philip possessed. For Philip possessed not only material powers, such as Persia held ; but by becoming a Greek unto the Greeks, he was able to disguise their national subjection under national sympathies and forms. His wars were Greek wars, in which he led Greek against Greek, and even at the fatal day of Chseronea, it was as an elected general of Greek forces that he subdued the last independent cities ; and when he called a Hellenic congress at Corinth, and was chosen cap- tain-general of Hellenic forces against the Asiatic, there must have been many of the Greeks who believed that their race was just about to enter on a still greater career. STUDY ON PERIOD 431-338. 35 From the siege of Troy to the day of Chaeronea, the course of Greek history is clearly evolutional and singularly free from outside influence. In politics, from first to last, the constant tendency to Hellenic union is overborne by the stronger ten- dency to local independence. This latter tendency, of course, had its advantage, in that it gave each local character opportu- nity to develop itself completely and distinctly. Each Homeric ideal culminates in the fifth century b.c. ; — Achilles into the Spartan warrior ideal ; Ulysses into the Athenian who is at once general and statesman ; the bard has grown through gen- erations to the full stature of the Athenian dramatists. That these types tended to culminate so variously in Athens is to be attributed, perhaps, mainly to two facts : one, her free trading and commercial life, which took her citizens to and fro through the contemporaneous world, quickening their minds with new ideas, enlarging their hearts with new sympathies ; the other, her free constitution, which educated every man to hear, to think, to decide in regard to matters of larger import than the petty round of merely individual life can furnish. Suggestions for Dictation and Examination. — Illustrate from Greek history the saying, "He who will save his life shall lose it." The military value of unselfishness. We say now-a-days, "The pen is mightier than the sword"; what would an Athenian have said instead, and how might he have illustrated it? When did the fall of Greece begin, and how? Why should Athenians be quicker to seize opportunity than the Spartans ? Why should they be more patriotic than Persians? Than other Greeks? Why should they be more interested in Greece as a whole than other Greeks were? What had made the Athenians, as a whole, politically acute ? Demosthenes?'. Philip. The real causes of the Peloponnesian War. Its results and effects. Letters of an Athenian to a Milesian, 405-338. The Spartan V. the Athenian spirit. Influence of the Greek ideas and ideals in our own time. 36 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. THE HELLENISTIC OR ALEXANDRIAN CON- QUESTS AND KINGDOMS, 338-146 B.C. The general results of the work on pp. 119-127 may be sum- marized as follows : — THE HELLENISTIC OR ALEXANDRIAN CONQUESTS AND KINGDOMS. Organizations formed. Military monarchies or despotisms, supported by standing armies. Results of Conquests and the Foundation of the Ne^v King- doms. Development of trade. New trade-routes opened to the East : Canal from Nile to Red Sea. Trading posts in Indian Ocean. Foundation of new trade-centres : Alexandria. Antioch. Seleucia (near Babylon). Pergamos. Development of art, science, and literature, in new directions, with Alexandria, Antioch, and Pergamos, as centres. Natural science, especially medicine, astronomy, physics. Poetry, — pastoral and elegiac. Drama, — new comedy. Spread of Greek language, in Egypt, Macedon, Syria, Asis Minor, and eastward toward India. Character of Civilization (Hellenistic) affected by previous Egyp- tian and Oriental culture. Dependent on courts for development and support. Practical in its tendencies, seen in new schools of ethics, — Epicureanism. Stoicism. ALEXANDRIAN CONQUESTS AND KINGDOMS. 3T new forms of literature, — new comedy. pastoral and ) , , . [ poetry, elegiac ) new directions of thought, — scientific. It should be distinctly felt that the conquests of Alexander owe their importance to the fact that they were the conquests of Hellenism ; by Hellenism, meaning the spirit of Hellenic culture, rather than its body. For it will be seen that the Alexandrian art, poetry, thought, and activity, ran after all in new channels, determined by the contact of the versatile Hel- lenic mind with new circumstances and with old, firmly-fixed civilizations, fitted rather to give than receive impressions. The spirit of local patriotism yielded to the cosmopolitanism of an empire ; and the seriousness of Socrates, ^schylus, and Aristophanes, changed to the practical observations and ethics of men of the world. That Alexander felt and made him- self the representative of the Greek world is clear enough ; chosen general-in-chief of Greek forces by a congress of Hel- lenic states, sanctioned by Delphi, sacrificing to the Greek deities, dedicating his spoils to the Athena of the Acropolis, and establishing Greek political forms in the cities he founded and conquered, the pupil of Aristotle and the lover of Homer seemed to be Greek in all but name.^ That the Greeks themselves were uneasy under the Alexandrian rule militates not in the least against this view, since throughout their organ- ization and history, their little city-states were always uneasy under any attempt at centralization, whether native or foreign ; and during this very period, we find their most hopeful attempts at political union, the Greek leagues, — the famous forerun- ners of modern confederacies such as are our United States, — marred by their partial character ; while all the attempts to regain 1 It is interesting to note in this connection the modern Greek claim to the old Macedonian land, as a just part of the Greek territory. 88 STUDIES IN GENERAL. HISTORY. independence are too local to have the least worth. In fact, the whole Greek history is an illustration of particularism., a term which the teacher may do well to introduce as the antithe- sis of centralization. It will be noted in the progressive history of the Aryan world that states and empires increase in size ; thus, the Alexandrian empire exceeds the Persian in this respect, and is itself exceeded by the Roman. This Alexandrian empire illustrates, too, both in its conquests and its foundations, the fact that the ancient world was held and characterized by its great metropolitan centres of wealth, population, and art. It was not the desire of land that drew Alexander eastward with his Greeks ; the heaped-up splendors of Tyre and Sidon, of Jerusalem and Damascus, of Memphis and Babylon, were richer boot}^ than the rough North and West could offer, and their possession meant the absolute possession of all their subject lands ; since with- out their walls was neither wealth, nor will, nor leadership for resistance ; the land was but their great dumb feeder. So to establish his own power permanently, Alexander felt that he must found cities, that should stamp and rule all the surround- ing land and folk ; hence, the noble foundations of Alexandria, Antioch, Pergamos, Candahar, Smyrna, enduring, living monu- ments of Hellenistic sagacity and power. But from this very fact of strong and widely separated centres, the Alexandrian empire, though continuous in territory and with the same gov- erning people, could not hold together. The interests of each centre were too strong and too strongly supported by old his- toric divisions of language, faith, and spirit, to allow of any- thing more than the most fleeting union. Of these new foun- dations, Alexandria is justly considered greatest, since it com- manded the commerce of the Nile, and all the caravan routes of Southern Asia. In our own times, it has gained a new importance by the opening of the Suez Canal. Since Alexander is of the small number whom all men call *' Great," it will be wise for the teacher to dwell on the force of the adjective as here applied ; of course Alexander's work ROME, 753 (?) B.C. - 800 A.D. 39 was great since it effected the union of the Greek and Orient worlds ; but that the man himself was great is shown by the very facts of his eastward march ; by the net of conquest which he drew about Asia Minor, by securing all the strong cities of her coasts, thus holding the outlets and inlets of the country ; by the courage and perseverance with which he pushed across hostile, desert, and unknown lands, to discover what and where the wonderland of India was ; by the unbroken daring with which, in the face of mutiny, he built a fleet in order to send Nearchus back a new way ; by the boundless energy and wis- dom with which he dotted his march with towns. Suggestions for Essay and Examination "Work. — Was Alex- ander the Conqueror or the Representative of the Greeks ? (Debate.) Journal of a Greek soldier in the Alexandrian army. Letter of a dis- contented Macedonian soldier from an Indian encampment. The debt of civilization to the Alexandrian despots. Alexander compared with Xerxes. The advantages and disadvantages of individualism as illustrated by Greek history. Compare the Greek invasion of Asia with the Asiatic invasion of Greece. The influence of the Orient on Greek thought and action in Alexandrian times. 3>*:c ROME, 753 (?) B.C. -800 A.D. The answers to the questions on p. 130 may be summarized as follows : — ITALY. Geographic Character and Position. Large, fertile plains, with easy, natural separations : Valley of the Po. Plains eastward of the Apennines. Plains of Campania. Variety of soil and production. Protection from invasion by Alps. Seas. 40 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Italy. — Continued. Central position in Mediterranean, commanding commerce of Spain, the Rhone valley, the African coasts, and all eastern commerce passing by it westward.^ Nearest civilized neighbors at 776 b.c. : Carthage (Phoenician). Greece. Race Distribution, determined by mountain barriers and river- basins. Kelts, in Po valley. Italians and Etruscans, in centre. Latins, centred about Rome. Samnites, in mountains. Etruscans, in Tuscan plain. Greeks, in south and in Sicily. Results of Geographic Character and Position of Italy. Natural political divisions larger than in Greece. Beginning of civilization later than in Greece. Natural occupation and support, — agriculture and commerce. Sources of foreign civilization, — Greek and Phoenician. Special Advantages of Rome. Central position in Italy. Commands the Tiber water-way. Unites seven hill-fortresses. In the midst of a fertile plain. While the geographical advantages and peculiarities of Italy should be clearly appreciated, too much stress must not be laid upon them, since all history teaches that while geography is a great primary factor in starting a people, it soon becomes over- laid and involved with many other factors as powerful, so that, in time, it loses much of its influence. 1 Of course this command would only come with the mastery of Italy and Sicily by a single power; this acquired, Italy is easily mistress of all the Mediterranean commerce passing her eastward or westward, by virtue of the narrow seas between hergclf and Africa. STUDY ON REGAL ROME. 41 A. B. I. STUDY ON KEGAL EOME AND PEH-PUNIO EEPUBLIO. The studies, pp. 130-151 inclusive, may be summarized some- what as follows : — REGAL AND PR^-PUNIC REPUBLICAN ROME. Organizations of the Period within (Roman). Patrician monarchy. Power centred in a king, limited by a body of patricians, bound together by birth and worship, 753(?)-510(?) B.C. Patrician aristocratic republic, 510 (?) B.C. Developed by patrician revolt against the oppression of royalty in concentrating power, in use of public money, imposition of public burdens. Based on bonds of kinship and religion. Characterized by concentration of power in hands of senate, division of royal power among magistrates. Patricio-plebeian republic, 264 B.C. Developed by party strife of patricians and plebeians, caused by social and) class distinctions, political ) harsh debt-laws, unjust distribution of land, strengthened by military power of plebeians, traditional and organized rule of patricians, neutralized by common interest and needs in defence and conquest. Based on bonds of common interest and residence. Rigid social classes (patricians, plebeians) formed by distinctions of birth and worship, distinguished by exclusive patrician privileges. 42 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Regal and Tr.il-Punic Republican Rome. — Continued. composed of patriarchal families, forming clans and tribes, as with the Greeks. Organizations of Period -without (Italian). The Roman military and agricultural colony. The Latin league. The Italian allied towns. Developments and Tendencies of People and Time. Democracy. Equal distribution of political power. Social equality. Political parties. Patricians v. plebeians. Rich V. poor (compare with aristocrats and democrats, the Eupatrids and the " Many " of the Greek cities). Constant and consolidated growth of dominion. Caused by order of conquest, — Latium, Etruria. Samnium. South Italy, mixture of Romans and Italians in residence, religion. government and law. superiority of Rome to neighboring peoples in defences, position, organization. Resulting in uniting Italy in language (Latin), law, habits, religion. Introduction of foreign culture (from Greece and Phoenicia). Original development in architecture, — arch, government, - constitution of Rome, management of conquests. STUDY ON REGAL ROME. 43 Characteristics of Period. Close union of politics and religion (church and state). Polytheistic faith. Utilitarianism, seen in religion. public works. attitude towards art and literature. Domination of individual by state. Strict regard for form and order, seen in politics. religion. Patrician dignity, pride, patriotism. Severity and simplicity, seen in law. manners. style of life, — agricultural, military. Ideals of period, — warrior. law-giver. farmer. Just here, in the study of the Roman constitutions, the teacher will find the advantage of having taken time for the thorough understanding of the constitutional development of Athens ; if this has been mastered, he will find that the work on the develop- ment of the Roman constitution may be made little more than a quick review and application of what the pupil already knows. For, although more complex and extended, the constitutions of Rome are, after all, of the antique type, and follow from stage to stage the antique development. As in the Athenian, so in the Roman state, these marked revolutions occur. Within an original society, composed of the king and his tribal nobles, _ known as Eupatrids or Patricians ("the well-born," the " fathers"), the oppressions of the king, and the power of the nobles, result in the overthrow of monarchy, and the establish- ment of a state, exclusive and aristocratic to the outside world, 44 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. but within itself pervaded with political and social equality. This aristocratic republic, in turn attacked by those without its pale of birth and worship, is compelled little by little to yield a place and name in the state, to the real powers of wealth, labor, plebeian numbers and fighting value, until at last, a final stage is reached by the constitutions of Clisthenes, and the Patricio-Plebeian Republic, in which all dwellers in the state are citizens endowed, by law at least, with equal powers and rights. While this is the general course of the development of the ancient state, attention should be called to more detailed com- parisons ; as that the Roman curies correspond to the old Ionic tribes of the time of Solon ; that the centuries are divided like the Solonian tribes according to wealth ; while the tribes of 264 B.C. are the Roman equivalent for the tribes of Clisthenes; again, the division of the people into adverse parties on account of distinctions of birth and wealth, and oppressive laws of debt, is duplicated from the Hellenic cities. It is well, also, to allow the pupil to foretell the probable changes in the Roman state from Greek analogies as well as from the actual Roman condi- tions ; thus, he should be able to foresee from both points of view, that the first revolution will result in the transference of power from the king to the nobles. Here too, as strictly as in Sparta, the military organization was identical with the politi- cal ; a fact which enabled the evidently large plebeian popula- tion of Rome to win its wa}* into the state as its necessar}- defenders. 1 This hold which the plebeians had upon the patri- cians is well illustrated by the story from Livy on p. 136, which admirably shows the temper of either party, — the plebeian impatience of patrician lordship, the patrician fear of plebeian desertion, — while we see both impatience and fear first yield- 1 This is by no means a necessary relation, except in states of the mili- tary type ; in industrial communities, workers are worth as much as sol- diers to the state. STUDY ON REGAL ROME. 45 ing before the pressing need of defending their common city, and then culminating in the affair of the Sacred Mount, by which the fixed determination of the plebeians gained a place in the magistracy of the city, in spite of the obstinate tenacity of the nobles. The characteristic features in the growth of Rome's dominion are best seen in contrast with the imperial growth of Athens ; Athens stands as a single city among equals who consent to follow her leadership ; the one word that expresses the power and character of Roman rule is unity ; Rome peoples her sub- ject lands with her citizens ; her colonies are no commercial outposts of traders who always remember they are Greeks among barbarians ; they are communities of soldier-farmers, who seize and settle the land, become " sons of the soil," and little by little force upon the people their own standards of law and faith and speech, through the power of their fixed and dominant relation. After the studies on the constitution and the dominion of Rome, the pupils are fairly ready to understand the historical force of the words " growth" and " development" ; the former applying exactly to the increase in size of the state, while the latter describes the unfolding of its various parts or organs to their complete relations and force. In studying the life, the art, the works of Rome, it is appar- ent that whatever is of use in the house or the farm, in the camp or the forum, is accepted and admired, and that any superfluous thing is rejected as effeminate ; in their assemblies, men are expected to vote independently and decisively, without listening to discussions or speeches which might sway their minds ; the native art hardly goes further than to commemorate a great deed by a tablet, or a great man by an attempt at a portrait-statue, or to build a mighty wall against invasion ; hence, so far as it goes, that art has the mere stamp of simplicity and effective strength. Even in their faith, the gods are evidently regarded first of all as powers whose favor it is well to gam by 46 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. prayer and sacrifice and festival, because they can give plenti- ful harvests and abundant victory ; the deities, like the folk, live and move and have their being in the visible working circle of the hearth, the field, the tent, the forge. Better than anything else, the Twelve Tables reflect the temper of that early Roman polity ; absolute justice and equal- ity among citizens ; protection for the very slave of Rome ; but for the outsider, the " foreigner," no law*, no recognition ; even for the citizen, no escape from the rigors of the harshest pen- alty ; the state dominates all ; here, as in a mirror, we see the stern, harsh life of the warlike, superstitious, exclusive, strong- handed city. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — Geographic influence on Roman character. Comparison of Roman and Athenian environment; same of development. Roman character as seen in Roman faith. Speech of a plebeian to his fellows on the Sacred Mount. Visit of an Athenian to Rome about 400 B.C. Same of a Spartan. The gods of Greece versus the gods of Rome. How far was Rome a civilized state at 264 b.c.V Pericles and Cincinnatus. What was the use of a dictator to Rome? B. 11. STUDY ON EEPTOLIOAN ROME, POTIO PERIOD. In the study on the Punic period the military type of state is brought sharply into contrast with the commercial type ; this one fact marks the difference, — Rome conquers her neighbors, while Carthage pays them tribute. This by no means says that the Romans were the braver folk, but simply that their living was partly dependent on war, and the gains of war, while for theirs, the Carthaginians demanded leisure, and friendly rela- tions with as many peoples as possible. The studies on pp. 153, 155, 158, 1G2, 164, 1G6, 169, may be summarized somethino: as follows : — STUDY ON REPUBLICAN ROME. 47 PUNIC PERIOD, 264-146 B.C. — ROME AGAINST CARTHAGE. Comparative Vievsr of Antagonists, 264 B.C. Rome. Carthage. Territory : Continental, — Italy, Maritime ; colonial,— Sicily, south of Apennines. African and west Medi- terranean coasts, Spain (Cadiz), Sardinia. Armies : Citizens. Mercenaries, and subject peoples. Basis of life, occupa- Agriculture. Commerce. tion : Material civilization : ^ Primitive. Highly developed. Ideal : Soldier and law -giver. Wealthy merchant and skil- ful navigator. Comparative Power among states, — about equal, as shown by the affair of the Mamertines. Growth of Home during Period. In dominion. By First Punic War, — Sicily, Corsica, Sardinia, alliances in Spain and Gaul. By Second Punic War, — Spain, dependent alliance of Carthaginian Africa. By period from Second to Third Punic War, — Cisalpine Gaul. Macedonia and Greece. Western Asia Minor. By Third Punic War, — Carthaginian Africa, as a province. [Note that this conquest is steady and progressive, new possessions being adjacent to old.] In wealth : The tribute of Carthage, Macedonia, and Sicily. In fighting power : Tributary troops of Carthage, Macedonia, and Sicily ; 1 After the preliminary study on Phoenicia, this comparison should be made almost without thinking on the part of the student. 48 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTOBY. PcNxc Period, 264-146 b.c. — Continued. Allied troops of Western Asia ; The formation of a fleet; .*. Becomes leading military power of Mediterranean. In influence : Becomes leader and arbiter of Mediterranean lands. In organization : Beginning of provincial governments (imperial type). In civilization : Influence of Greece and the Orient, seen in literature, art. life. Character displayed during Period. By Carthage : Avarice, — mistaken prudence; at the last, patriotism. Dependence on great generals, and their personal power over mercenaries {Hannibal).^ By Hannibal : Patriotism, perseverance, determination, ingenuity, cour- age, personal power, good judgment. By Greece : Disunion, jealousy, love of freedom. By Rome, before the close of Second Punic War : Reliance on whole body of citizens, on law and patriotism. Patriotism, determination, courage, perseverance. Strong regard for religious forms. Native genius, — military, legal, engineering. Concentration of life at city of Rome : Legal and military, in hands of patricians. Literary and artistic, in hands of foreigners (Greeks). 1 Note that Hannibal's single qualities, acting through a body of loyal soldiery, match the collective qualities of the Roman state, acting through a body of patriotic citizens. Hannibal has within himself those elements of success which Rome possesses, and which Carthage lacks ; but finally, he lacks the independent power to develop his own genius to a victorious issue. It is a significant contrast that Carthage concentrates her greatness in a single man, while Rome obtains greatness from the diffusion of great qualities among her citizens. STUDY ON KEPUBLICAN ROME. 49 By Rome, in later Punic period, 201-146 B.C. Growth of new aristocracy on bases of military \ official >■ superiority, monied ) Tendency to subject law to the individual (Scipio, Fabius). Growth of demagogism, — games, corn distributions. Growth of popular power (Roman rabble). Political corruption. Harshness, cruelty, and injustice to allies, provincials, and slaves. Influx of Greek and Oriental culture brought in by triumphs. returning soldiers and officials, opposed by Cato and old-style Romans. Ideal, — the successful general with plenty of booty. Taste for coarse and cruel amusements, — low comedy, gladiatorial fights. Tendencies to atheism, together with superstition and formality. Decay of small farmers caused by large estates worked by slaves, hence no demand for free labor. distributions of cheap or free provincial grain at Rome, hence no Roman market for grain, resulting in drift of landless men to Rome. selling of the suffrage. idle Roman populace, dependent on foreign bread, dangerous country population of slaves. The chief point to be noted in regard to organization during this period is the formation of an imperial relation. This rela- tion really begins with the acquisition of Sicily and the estab- lishment of provincial government, personified in proconsuls, 60 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. whose absolute rule abroad introduced the imperial principle into the Roman state. This point, though simple, must be emphasized, since the whole fabric of the empire had this for its excuse, the necessity of some organization by which a city could rule far-distant peoples and lands, and the emperors were always the rulers of the provinces rather than of Rome. The events of the later Punic period show very clearly how it was that when Rome had once made herself decidedly stronger than her neighbors, they naturally sought her alliance and her influ- ence ; thus, as the keeper of the peace, or as the champion of one party, people, or prince against another, tlie chosen arbiter and protector of the various Mediterranean lands became their administrator and conqueror. Even in this period, it is to be noted, that while the subject peoples of Rome were forced to accept absolutism at her hands, yet it was perhaps a lesser evil than their own chronic condition of civil war and anarchy. Just here, the pupil should be able to foresee something of the necessary future growth of Roman dominion, and at least to forecast the completion of the Mediterranean circle. If the teacher think best, he may at once ask for a comparison of the map on p. 157, with that of the finished empire, when the pupil will see that the natural process of growth only ends when great natural boundaries are reached, — the Rhine, the Danube, the ocean, the Sahara. The details of the Second Punic "War are remarkably instruc- tive, since by the very nature of the case they give us a con- stant comparison of characters and tempers and organizations. The citizen army versus the mercenary band, the popular con- trol of military movements as opposed to the absolutism of a great general, the respective play of moral forces in the indus- trial and the commercial state — all these are well worth study- ing. In the text I have called attention to a few detailed points, as to that unfortunate Roman organization which divided the command of the army between two consuls at the crisis of Cannae, when, if ever, Rome needed the absolute rule of a dictator to ensure prompt decision and consistency of action. STUDY ON liEPUBLICAN ROME. 51 The teacher will find it well worth his while to take all the time necessary to a fair appreciation of the changed conditions of Roman life and the consequent change in Roman character that are found in existence in the later Punic period, since thorough- ness here means the easy comprehension of the Empire. The fundamental change of all is due to the new ideals that entered the popular mind. The successful general, returning with plenty of mone}' and with hosts of strange and beautiful objects, easily became the popular hero, and could have what he would from the admiring crowd whose man he was willing to be. He could not oppress the Roman populace, it is true, for he had competitors who might outbid him to-morrow in glory or gener- osity ; unfortunately, competitors of his own kind, for, b}^ that constitutional fault which Pericles found it well to correct in Athens, no poor man could afford to hold office, since public officers were unpaid. ^ Hence arose a class of men, who wrested victories and tributes from abroad to become kind, indulgent demagogues at home. Perhaps Scipio may fairly stand as the first of the line which ended only with the firm establishment of imperialism. In the midst of her rapidl}" growing dominion, Rome was threatened by new dangers from within. Those arising from the oppression of slaves and allies are too evident and too temporary to require more than a simple passing notice ; but the most careful attention should be given to the land-question, since it is one of our pressing modern problems, and since, in the later republic, the actual facts are so well known, and the logic of events and conditions pressed so relentlessly on to its fatal end. By the importation of foreign slaves into Italy, the market for rural labor was destroyed, since the wealthy non-resident Roman landlords found it cheaper to work their country- estates b}' slaves ; by the importation of foreign grain, which rival demagogues cheapened or even gave away, the market for wheat was taken from the farmers of Italy, and without capital 1 Compare modern constitutions, British and American. 62 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. they found themselves quite unable to compete against the masters of large slave- worked estates, as raisers of stock or keepers of vineyards. So the small country holdings and the multitudinous country interests that held the men of Italy bound in close relations to her soil gradually died out, and the country population became one of slaves, mostly imported from abroad, with no interest, native or acquired, either in the soil or its labors. As for the owners of these estates, they mostl}' lived at Rome, using their country places for revenue and pleasure ; meanwhile, the old country population crowded to the city, where it formed an idle, helpless herd, corrupting the decisions of the Forum by its mercenary votes, sold to the highest bidder for amusement or food. Thus the living union of the soil and the man perished, the respect for labor vanished when it was no longer free, and the people of Italy became largely depend- ent on the provinces for food. Thus a natural relation arose between successful conquerors or rulers of provinces and suc- cessful and popular magistrates in Rome, and again the inevi- table course toward imperialism was confirmed. The last question on p. 169 calls for a classification of the dangerous tendencies of Rome into those that are politically, socially, and religiously so. But I have purposely- set this question in order to call attention to the fact that it is almost impossible to make such a classification since the social, politi- cal, and religious life, all make the complex organism of the state, and are inextricably mingled in its structure. The varied classifications made by the pupils will easily elucidate this point. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — The military versus the industrial character. (Debate.) The debate at Messana over the Roman or Carthaginian alliance. The end of Greece. The citizen army ; its defects and excellencies. The causes of the growth of the new aristocracy at Rome. When was Rome greater, at 264 or 146 B.C. ? At what time would you have been proudest to have been a Roman citizen? Draw parallels between any modern conditions that you know and the condition of affairs at Rome in the later Punic period. Account of a Spanish soldier to his village-comrades of the Italian campaign with Hannibal. A Roman soldier's first visit to STUDY ON REPUBLICAN ROME. 53 Athens. What tendencies and characteristics of the later Punic period seem to you legitimate developments from the earlier Roman character ? B. III. STUDY 0J5f EEPUBLIOAN EOME, POST-PUNIO PEKIOD. The work from pp. 170-192 should reach the general results indicated in the following summary : — ROMAN REPUBLIC, POST-PUNIC PERIOD, 146-27 B.C. Organization, — Military, Imperial, Democratic. Imperial, through the Mediterranean basin, excepting Italy. Democratic, in Italy, centering at Rome. in military leaders, or Imperators (Emperors). Characteristics. Constant party strife, — over questions, over persons, between people and senate (democracy v. aristocracy). Italians and Romans, poor and rich. Social and political discontent displaying itself in dissensions of the Gracchi, servile revolts. Social War. resulting in agrarian laws (to check the growth of large estates), extension of suffrage to Italy. Progressive growth ^ of Roman dominion to natural limits of seas, rivers, mountains, deserts. (See map.) Progressive centralization of power in persons of successful generals, — Marius. Sulla. Pompey. Julius Caesar. Augustus Caesar Imperator (emperor) . 1 The easy and natural course of this progressive dominion, as com- pared with the long and endless civil disturbances, indicates that the real strength of Rome lay in her armies rather than in her constitutions. 64 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Roman Republic. — Continued. developed by necessities of the state for provincial order, frontier defence, military organization, based on popular favor, secured by games, grain-distribution, eloquence in favor of popular measures, generous use of money, actual command of armed forces, military success. Corruption and weakness of Roman government, consisting in bribery, extortion, injustice, inefficiency, stupid selfishness (treatment of allies), seen in the Jugurthine War. the conspiracy of Catiline, the prosecution of Verres. constant civil wars and disturbances, and their difficult suppression. Growing love of wealth and pleasure. Development of native Italian talent in oratory -^ in poetry (under Greek influence) >- new.^ in history ) in engineering, law, politics, war, — as before. Growth of skepticism among cultured, of superstition among masses, resulting in adoption of Greek philosophy deification of Csesar. identification of religion with the state. * It is to be noted that when the Italian genius began to display itself in a literature truly Latin, it still declared itself a practical genius, choos- ing facts and contemporary life and incident for its material, even when dependent on the Greeks for form. The direction which the native genius was to take in all its original work is well' marked out by the list of subjects on which the Elder Cato wrote, p. 163. STUDY ON REPUBLICAN KOME. 55 The above tabulation is so very general that it can only be given after the full completion of the work. During its prog- ress, the teacher may wish to sub-summarize the results of some of the special studies something as follows : — " Dissensions of the Gracchi." Caused by unequal distribution of land, unequal political status of Italians and Romans.^ exclusive judicial power of senate, discontent of poor, knights. Italian So Resulting in formation of parties : Democratic (radical, reforming party, embodied in popular assembly). Aristocratic (conservative party, embodied in senate), more violent agitation (Drusus, and Social War), establishing of precedents of violent and illegal action in city government. The last point in this summary is of prime importance ; froni the time of the Gracchi onward, neither the people nor their leaders serioush' hesitated to use force or to override the con- stitution in order to achieve their alms. Thus Marius and Sulla ruled the Forum by force of arms, disregarded or t3Tan- nized over elections, while Sulla, as dictator, assumed not only the powers of a general, but those of the Roman assemblies as well, in disposing of the lands and lives of citizens. Perhaps there is no one series of events so instructive in regard to all the political relations at Rome as that of the 1 The Roman franchise meant to the Italians cheap grain, a share in the conquered lands of the rapidly growing dominion of Rome, oppor- tunity for glory, wealth, and political power. The Romans naturally delayed to grant it, since division of the spoils meant a smaller share for themselves. 56 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Jugurthine War. At its opening, we see just how it was that Rome became so easily mistress when once she became medi- ator. Numidia, nominally independent, was in realitj* the absolute subject of Rome, and declared herself so in the alter- nate appeals of her princes. As soon as actual interference began, we see in turn the moral weakness of Rome, the inabil- ity of her senators and generals to maintain an acknowledged right against the power of the bribe, the insubordination of her armies, the unwillingness of her generals to displease the mob of the forum or the camp. Again we see the close relation existing between success on the field and official success in Rome, the rivalry of the Italian and the Roman, of the senate and the tribes. The whole history is not so significant as being the story of the conquest of Numidia as in being the account of the subtle ruin which Roman citizens, generals, and senators were all bringing upon their native city. The provincial government of Verres injured Rome by dimin- ishing her revenue, reputation, and consequent power, b}' wast- ing and depopulating her grain-growing estates, by shaking that religious faith which always formed a basis of political power in antiquity. The speech of Cicero, moreover, shows that the case of Verres was typical, and that provincial oppres- sion and greed of provincial office for the sake of provincial spoils was no uncommon thing. In the rise of Julius Caesar we have another of those special studies that throw light for us on the whole contemporary life and action of the state. The prominent qualities of his charac- ter were resolution, hardihood, unscrupulousness, daring, mixed with prudence, patience, temperance, generosity*, intellectual taste and power, personal vanity and ambition, warm and ready sympathies with those who aided or did not withstand his power ; add to this the genius of Rome's greatest general, and an elo- quence equal to that of the best, and you find combined in this one man every quality needful for success in a government fallen into the hands of a spoiled city populace, ready to be bought by the magnificent expenditures which Cajsar well knew how STUDY ON REPUBLICAN ROME. 57 to make, and ready to be intimidated by troops invincibly attached to a leader who was the personification of good fellow- ship and soldierly quality. Fortunately for Rome, however, Ciesar was greater than a mere demagogue. He aspired not to be greater because of Rome, but to make Rome greater be- cause of Ctesar ; hence, to his name and suggestion may be traced many of the noblest measures of the early empire. The latest follower of the Gracchi, he stood for the rights of the provinces as they had stood for those of Italy. He had a higher ambition than to give the citizens of Rome new peoples for slavery and new lands for plunder ; he had a vision of a strong and thoroughly-welded state, that should be comprised of provincials as well as Romans, but through which the Roman genius should interpenetrate a living growth by transmarine and transalpine colonization. Hence, we find that the enemies of Caesar are Romans, while the universal provincial mourning for him shows the cosmopolitan sympathies which he felt and aroused. Perhaps the time has not yet passed when every one has a right to his own opinion as to the effect of Caesar's death on Rome. To us, his assassination seems but to prolong the death- agony of the republic, and delay the inevitable birth of empire. Throughout these studies, the constant evolutional relation between the tendencies and character of the later Punic period, and the tendencies and character of the last age of the republic should be kept in view. The *' General Study" on p. 189 should allow the freest dis- cussion and the largest possible range of opinion, at the same time that certain positive generalizations are made, as that, from beginning to end, the Romans had one unchanging ideal, the militar}', and one unchanging taste, for the practical. In the later republic we see the new ideals of wealth and pleasure arising from new resources brought to Rome b}" her victorious armies ; meanwhile, the old admiration for a simple, even severe, type of morals and manners gives way before the charms of the Greeks and the lawlessness of popular heroes. In fact, 58 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. regarding the native Roman genius as practical, legal, military, the most Roman age of all her history would seem to be that of the earlier republic, culminating in the epic of the second Punic war. But here opinions would justly differ. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — What essen- tials for good republican government did Rome lack in the first cen- tury B.C.? Dialogue regarding their respective miseries between a Greek slave and an Italian farmer, 100 b.c. Julius Caesar, the ^venger of the Gracchi. The political importance of the murder of Tiberiu* Gracchus. Journal of a Roman citizen, 88-78 b.c. The popular ori- gin of the emperors. The Greek versus the Roman genius. (Debate.) The relation between Roman tastes and amusements, and the develop- ment of the Roman character. Letter written home by a Gallic soldier and senator on the occasion of Caesar's death. The Roman roads and the Roman Empire. Reflections of Adherbal on Rome. Reflections of Cato on the past and the present. C. I. STUDY ON THE PAGAN EMPIRE. —AUGUSTUS TO OONSTANTINE, 27 B.C. - 323 A.D. Discussion of Map-Questions. — The questions on p. 192 are so easy and general, that the teacher may introduce a pleasing variety by allowing their discussion to come up in a class-room conversation without any previous preparation. Even from the first, the division of the Empire into a Latin half and a Greek and Oriental half was predestined. From Trieste eastward, the bulk of the towns were founded and inhabited by Greeks and Orientals, and were mistresses of lands and peoples stamped for centuries by Greek and Oriental culture. From Trieste westward, the towns were mostly of Roman foundation, and set in the midst of a barbarism un- touched even in the days of Pericles. The only exceptions important to note are the southern parts of Spain and Italy, where the Greek and Oriental mixture always strongly modified the Latin element. The two facts of the large number of cities in the Empire, and of their position, almost without exceptioDj on the coast, STUDY ON THE PAGAN EMPIRE. 59 or on river-courses, indicate the general commercial activity of the Empire ; but " All roads led to Rome." The studies on the Pagan Empire may be summarized some- what as follows : — PAGAN EMPIRE, 27 B.C. -323 A.D. Central Organization : Imperialism, tending to hereditary despotism. Centralized in person of emperor. city of Rome (citizens of Home have the highest rights and privileges possible under the Empire). Supported by standing army, substantial basis of power, general taxation, severest in the provinces.^ adulation and adoration (deification) of emperors, republican forms and titles. Dependent for excellence on character of emperors ; e.g., Nero and the Antonines. Bonds of union : Language, — Latin in West. Greek in East.^ Law and government. Worship (adoration of emperor) .^ Easy communication by roads, seas, rivers. Local Organizations : Municipal, republican, democratic, similar to the organization of republican Rome, which the cities of the West largely copied. Tendencies and Characteristics. Growth of Greek and Oriental influence, seen in literature and art. language, religion (Christianity). 1 Indeed, to use the telhng phrase of Prof. Seeley, the provinces were " the great estates " of Rome, whose revenues fed and clothed her citizens. 2 Note that the East roughly corresponds to the old Alexandrian Empire. 3 Jews and Christians were monotheists, and so could not join the body of the Empire consistently in this regard; hence, one reason for their constant persecution. 60 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Pagan Empire. — Continued. Practical bent of Roman mind, seen in native forms of literatui'e, — history and contemporary criticism, public works, — baths, bridges, aqueducts, amphitheatres. Growth of Christianity, — seen in imperial persecutions. growth of Christian literature (compare third cen- tury with first), importance of heresies, threatening disunion, favored by unity and peace of Empire, decay of old religions. Progressive civilization and equalization of the provinces,^ seen in origin and education of great men. universal suffrage given by Caracalla. Differentiation of East and West in language, — Latin (West). Greek (East), municipal foundations and populations, civilization, — Latin (West). Greek and Oriental (East), thought (note Eastern origin of heresies). Development of nmnicipal centres of influence and culture. Rome. Alexandria. Antioch. Carthage. Comparative peace and order. Decline of third century seen in deterioration of literature and art. constant civil war. 1 That Spain came first into prominence was probably due to her earlier conquest by Home, and possibly to her still earlier contact with Phoenicians. STUDY ON THE PAGAN EMPIRE. 61 growing difficulties with barbarians, indicated by new defences of Rome. frontier wars, development of hereditary despotism, — Diocletian. change and deterioration of population. ^ Ideals : among the Pagans, — wealth, leisure, pleasure. among the Christians, — a pure, upright, brave, modest, industrious, self-denying. Christlike man. Permanent Remains of Civilization. Literature, — history, poetry. Roads. Laws. The Christian religion. Languages, — French, Spanish, Italian. Cultivated lands of Latin countries. Architectural forms, — arch and dome. The first question on p. 205 is intended to test the student's understanding of the word "constitutional," as applied to organic changes in government ; such changes occurred in the transference of municipal elections from the assemblies to the Senate, under Tiberius ; in the introduction of provincials to the Senate, under Claudius ; in the new powers given b}' Hadrian to the Council of State ; in the extension of citizen- ship to every freeman of the Empire by Caracalla. These changes were all in the line of a natural development of the imperial constitution, and culminated at last in that radical step taken by Diocletian, — the division of the Empire between despotic rulers of the Oriental type. It is worth noting that equality grew with despotism ; or, to put it more justly, sub- jects ceased to rise, as rulers gained more universal power ; and the provincial basis of the power of the emperor received new illustration from the fact that, in the process of equalization, 1 As the Roman populations decay, barbarian elements arc substituted for them, especially in the army. 62 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. the provincials gained. Indeed, the provincials were the chief gainers by the whole imperial system ; no emperor would for a moment have tolerated such bad management as that of Yerres and his fellows ; to rule the province well for the emperor meant that it should be protected from invasion and disorder, that its internal resources should be fully developed, and that its people should, on the whole, be contented with their Roman master. With the universal loss of actual freedom, with the growth of great armies under rival generals, and the increasing custom of deciding the imperial succession by civil war, it was per- haps well that the hereditary i:)rinciple should gradually come to be recognized; for, while it subjected the Empire to the chance of birth, this was perhaps no worse a chance to run than that of the decision of war, while at least it relieved men from the confusion and anarch}^ of this latter method. Under either method, the great fault of the constitution was, that, resting as it did on a purely military basis, it neither repre- sented nor developed, but, on the contrary, repressed the moral and intellectual strength of the Empire, and that, too, in the direction of government, where such forces were most sorely needed. In the lists of great men and works in the imperial period we find simply the natural development of the practical Roman genius. We see that works on histor}*, science, law, biography, far outweighed in number and general value the productions of the poet or philosopher. The one great original poet, Horace, was clever rather than great, and acquired popularity by the graceful ease with which he satirized the actual world ; while Virgil appealed to the pride of the Roman race by singing in a half historic form their own ancestral glories. In art the same tendency is to be noticed ; whenever Rome broke away from the influence of Greek subjects, she at once left the company of gods and heroes, and sought to delineate, without idealizing, the famous men, the striking scenes and characters of contemporary life. STUDY OK THE fAGAK EM1»IRE. 63 The study on p. 218 is intended rather to bring fresh proofs in support of previous points than to convey any new informa- tion. The extract from Virgil, p. 212, shows how easily an emperor like Augustus was regarded as a god, since, like the Roman deities in general, he procured for the people material blessings. The extract from Epictetus shows us, in a word, what these blessings were, and that, though the Romans had no longer either liberty or courage (see Tacitus) , they had, at least, peace and order, and freedom of movement. This, in fact, was the sole glory of the Empire. Even these material blessings were not unmixed ; Tiberius felt it when he pointed out to the Senate (p. 213) the absolute dependence of Italy on the provinces for her daily food. But the great faults of the imperial period were, after all, moral ; they are seen in that indifferent, selfish temper, which made " all Rome guilty of this Nero" ; in that avarice and jealousy of the legions, in that flattery and cowardice of citizens and senators alike, to which Otho owed the purple ; in that atmos- phere whose interest centred in horses and gladiators ; in that good-natured, fashionable contempt for labor, voiced by Pliny. All these influences were constantly educating a new generation into the typical Roman life of the period, while, according to Tacitus, they were strengthened rather than opposed b}' the educational surroundings of the child. It is a grave question how far the individual was to blame for all this demoralization. A society organized on a slave basis, by A^rtue of that very fact cannot respect labor ; and the centralization of power in the hands of one man always tends to weaken the minds and morals of those subjected to it, — two mighty causes of wide-spread evils. At the close of all the discussions and summaries of this period, the teacher may, if he think best, thus summarize the contrasts between the Roman Empire and the Christian Church, considering both simply as historic organizations, brought into sharper and sharper contrast as the fourth century ap- proached : — 64 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Roman Empire. Christian Church. Founded on force of arms. force of ideas and faith in them. Bonds of union government, law, language, belief in the fatherhood of formal worship of the one God, and the brother- emperor. hood of all men. Social distinc- based on birth, wealth, and none ; equality of all classes tions occupation. and races before God, a predominant teaching. Morality based on selfishness. based on unselfishness. Ideals the emperor, the wealthy man of leisure, the high official. the Christlike man. It will be noted in this contrast what mutually destructive agencies were arrayed against each other. Christianity entered the ancient world to maintain the manhood and brotherhood of the slave or the alien ; to preach the existence of one God and of no other; to preach a morality based on love and self- denial. By virtue of these facts alone it attacked the whole framework of ancient societ}*, which rested so firmly on bonds of kinship and a polytheistic worship, which had come to regard a standing army as the condition of life itself, and whose best moralit}^ was an enlightened selfishness. Since that framework was largely wrought in favor of privileged classes, we see at once why Christianity was so fiercely attacked by the empire and so fondly and rapidly embraced by "the Many." Suggestions for Essay and Examination "Work. — The debt of Rome to Alexander. The debt of France and Spain to Rome. Parallel between the Emperor Augustus and the Greek " tyrants." Suppose that Brutus and Cassius had won at Philippi, instead of Octavian, what then ? A journey from Rome to London, 100 a.d. The Roman citizen the aristocrat of the Empire, 100 a.d. Journal of a (iallic soldier who was sent from the Rhine frontier to ^Memphis. Did the provinces conquer Rome, or Rome the provinces? The power behind the imperial throne. Reflections of a Christian in the STUDY ON THE TEUTONIC BARBARIANS. 65 Colosseum, 90 a.d. When did the changes formally made by Diocle- tian begin in reality ? Where did political liberty still exist at 300 A.D. ? The foreign debt of Roman literature. The Roman road v. the Phoenician ship. What is the most universal bond of union you have yet found in your study of history ? STUDY ON THE TEUTOMO BARBARIANS. The general results of the study may be tabulated as fol- lows : — * THE TEUTONIC BARBARIANS. Organization: Tribal — aristocratic and local. Units and bonds of union : patriarchic family, — kinship-bond. village community and mark-moot, — political unit with kinship-bond and bond of common property; supported by agriculture, warrior-band, — bonds of loyalty to a leader and a com- mon interest ; supported by booty of war. Classes of society and occupations (believed of divine origin) : serfs, — hard manual labor, freemen, — artisans and directors, nobles, — warriors. Magistrates : kings or chiefs, chosen for birth ; supported by gifts, chieftains, heads of warrior-bands ; supported by plunder, judges, chosen by the people for ability. Assemblies : mark-moot, — general village assembly, purely local, assembly of chiefs, — deliberative. general assembly of f reeborn warriors, — declares war, makes law, elects leaders and citizens, judges. Characteristics. Bases of life : war, seen in vocabulary and songs, and in warrior-band, agriculture, seen in vocabulary and in village community. Independent, local, democratic tendency in politics. 66 STUDIES IIJ GEItEKAL HISTORY. The Teutonic Barbarians. — Continued. Love of independence. Insecurity of society. Strength and influence of women. Generous hospitality ; scorn of manual (serf) labor. Ideal, — warrior. Race-Relationship, Aryan: seen in organizations, vocabulary, myths, ideas. Although this is a short study, it should be treated with marked care, since we now meet a fundamentally new type of societ}'. Ancient Greece and Rome were "city-states,"^ the powers of modern Europe are " country-states."^ The history of the former began in an Acropolis or Capitol ; that of the latter starts from the village and the canton ; the city-state was an independent unit ; the village and the canton are related b}' their organization to a larger area and population than their own. These differences developed greater, but at first the resemblances between the primitive groups of Teutons, Greeks, and Romans were more pronounced than their differences. Even that fundamental fact in the Teutonic village, the com- mon possession of land apportioned b}' the majority votes of the marks-men, seems to be matched by the division of public lands among the Roman citizens ; although, in the former case, the matter was far more closely connected with the very foun- dation of the state, and the land was not only divided, but managed by the mark-moot. But positive and unquestioned resemblances are to be found in the assemblies. Thus the Teutonic assembly of chiefs matched the Homeric assembly of Elders, the Areopagus, the various senates ; to the mark-moot corresponded the Agora, the Ekklesia, the Centuries, and the Tribes ; everywhere appeared the kinship-bond and the patri- archal family. Between magistrates it is more difficult to draw the parallel, since the god -born king among the Teutons seems at first subordinate to thef warlike chief whom a tribe may 1 These terms are borrowed from Prof. J. R. Seeley. STUDY ON THE TEUTONIC BARBARIANS. 67 choose to follow. This determination of rank by might in war finds illustration again in the fact that admission to the full political and military status of a Teuton was onl}' won by proved ability in arms, although Teutonic birth gave the first right to the Teutonic name ; and the kinship-bond had been so purely preserved, that, to Tacitus, the people appeared of pure, unmingled race. Once admitted to full Teutonic privileges, however, the individual found himself a free and equal member of a democratic community. Throughout this work the teacher should keep it well before the mind of the pupil that, in a more special sense than before, he is studying the origin of his own people and kin-folk, of his own ancestors in direct lineage. The following little table will show him how we stand in the great Aryan relationship : — EUROPEAN ARYAN STOCK. Keltic: Irish, Scotch, Welsh. Teutonic : Germans, English, Scandinavians, Americans. Slavic : Russians, Servians, and other Christian peoples of the Balkan peninsula, to a greater or less degree. Greeco-Italian : The Greeks and Romans of antiquity. Since the directions and dates of the early Aryan migrations 'ire still in the field of theory, it is best for the teacher, while allowing surmise, to discourage positive statements. That the migrations must have antedated 1000 b.c. is sure enough, from the fact of the then-established Greek, Italian, and Keltic peoples, fully separated by speech and habits. Geographical distribution, again, points with apparent clearness to a general movement from the region of the Black Sea, although the question of the original home of the Aryans is by no means settled. For a complete and recent discussion of the whole Aryan question, see Dr. O. Schrader's "Prehistoric Antiqui- ties of the Aryan Peoples." Translated by Jevons, London, 1890. We have some evidence in the common vocabulary of the house and field for maintaining that, before their separa- 68 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. tion, the Aryans already had in common possession the arts of agriculture, and some primitive form of navigation ; that tlieir flocks supplied the wool they wove and wore, while their herds performed for them the labors of the field, and furnished them the products of the dairy, which, with ground grain, made the staples of their food. Suggestions for Essay and Examination "Work. — A visit to the primitive Aryans before their separation into the various Em'o- pean races. The mark-moot and the New England town meeting. Compare the Teutonic ideal of womanhood with our own. Reflec- tions of a Teutonic prisoner of Julius Caesar on what he saw at Rome. The Aryan bonds of union. C. 11. THE CHRISTIAN EMPIRE. — OONSTANTINE TO CHARLEMAGNE. This division of the imperial history at the name and date of Constantine is popular rather than accurate ; although, as the founder of Constantinople, he appeared to the popular mind as the founder of the Eastern Empire, yet Diocletian had in realit}' been the first thus to divide the Roman dominion. Led to victory and converted, as he maintained, by the sign of the cross, and the first of the emperors to give Christianity high rank in the faiths of the Empire, Constantine has naturally been considered the founder of its temporal power, although it did not become the legal faith of Rome until the days of Theo- dosius. But since great and stirring events and influential myths have gathered about the name of Constantine, and since the great changes attributed to him did in reality receive from him their greatest impetus, it has seemed best for the purposes of a popular text-book to take advantage of the popular tendency to link the great events of an age with its greatest name. After 476 no more attention is paid to the Eastern Empire than is necessary in order thoroughly to understand the general CHRISTIAN EMPIRE UNDER ROMAN CONTROL. 69 history of Europe ; for, from that time, it follows its inevitable tendency to become an Oriental state, tempered and colored bv the Greek culture. II. A. THE OHEISTIAN EMPIEE UTOEE EOMAN OONTEOL. The studies on pp. 231-250, inclusive, may be summarized as follows : — CHRISTIAN EMPIRE. — CONST ANTINE TO ODOVAKER AND THEODORIC. Organization of State : Oriental despotisin. Centred at Rome and Constantinople, in persons of ijie emperors. Supported by forced taxes, barbarian armies. favor of privileged, powerful classes, — officials, soldiers, clergy. Organization of Church : Parallel to, and united with that of the state. Centred at Rome and Constantinople, in hands of bishops and emperors. Based on and supported by the belief and trust of men. conversion of barbarian masses. Goths. Visigoths. Irish, imperial edicts ^ (suppression of Paganism), favor of the poor, oppressed, neglected majority. 1 As Pontifex Maximus, the emperor was naturally regarded as the legal and temporal head of the church. 70 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Christian Empire. — Continued. Marked by internal unity, resulting from suppression of heresy, orthodox standard of faith, — Council of Nice, 325 a.d. acquirement by bishops of privilege, wealth. judicial power, spirit and forms of democracy. Characteristics of Period: Growth of Teutonic power caused by constitution of armies, composed of and officered by barbarians, settlement of Teutons as laborers, and owners of imperial soil in Gaul, Italy, Spain, and the lands of the Danube, culminating in so-called " Fall of Western Empire." shaped by Roman influence in religious organization and faith, military and political organization, ideals (see speech of Adolphus, p. 249). Pervading influence and power of Christianity, seen in organization. persecution of Paganism. law. predominant taste for religious literature. Arian controversy.^ 1 The intensity with whicli men were interested in theology is best seen in that large fact of the irreconcilable hostility of the Arian barbarian and the orthodox provincial. That this hostility was primarily religious is proved by the fact that in Gaul, during the next period, the orthodox barbarian Franks easily mingled witli tlie ortliodox provincials. This vio- lent hostility thoroughly justified to the men of that time the attempts of emperors and councils to enforce that unity of belief which meant both peace and power. Compare with the feeling often roused in modern times between Protestants and Catholics, CHRISTIAN EMPIRE UNDER ROMAN CONTROL. 71 the new saint-ideal, resulting in monastic organiza- tion. new materials (biblical and religious), in art and literature.^ mingled with pagan and heathen ideas, employed to humanize law. modify absolutism (Theodosius and Ambrose), protect the poor and oppressed. Intellectual leadership of East, seen in predominating proportion of literary centres, — Alexandria, Athens. Antioch, Caesarea. origin of literary men. origin of monastic ideal and of heresies. Moral decay of Kome, seen in imperial absolutism (see laws), corruption (bribery) and extravagance of courts ; .*. corruption and extravagance of fashionable life, servility, superstition, idleness, gluttony and luxury, resulting in hatred of Rome by her own subjects, oppression of over-taxed provinces. All the facts of this obscure but most important period clustered about three centres, — the church, the Empire, and the barbarians. These three centres were, however, connected in vital relations. The church and the barbarians took to themselves all that'was yet alive and of worth in the decaying Empire. Her intellectual and moral energy passed to the church ; her military and political power to the barbarians ; 1 Although in its beginnings Christian art could claim neither beauty nor truth, it was nevertheless original in its materials and impulses. In this originality lay the promise of the new development and inspiration which was to culminate in Raphael and Michael Augelo. 72 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. this receives fine illusti'ation from the fact that in the fourth and fifth centuries of her history, the great names were either those of bishops and popes, or those of war-chiefs and generals. The bishops and popes belonged to the civilized provincials, while the generals and war-chiefs were pure barbarian leaders.^ This one fact shows how the force of the Empire, leaving its old forms, deadened by despotism, and its old populations, spoiled and lielpless through luxury and moral decay, was urging its way into fresh forms and among new peoples. So long as the Empire had appeared to rule for the greatest benefit of the greatest number, the sting of despotism was con- cealed ; but in the fifth century it was, in the sight of all men, an organization managed in behalf of the ease, wealth, power, and pleasure of the emperor and his officials. In this regard, it was a striking contrast to the Athens of Pericles, or to Punic Rome, where the state was organized in behalf of the whole body of citizens. This contrast was still further heightened b}' the fact that it was precisely on the whole body of citizens that the burdens of government fell; the " curiales," the " decuri- ons," the free, but untitled citizens of Rome were just those whom she deprived of arms for self-defense, and from whom she extorted the taxes demanded to support the pomp and waste of four courts, and the establishments of countless officials, to say nothing of the justifiable charges of a goverament defending an enormous frontier b}' professional troops. When the imperial government became so thoroughly a matter of routine, its excellence still depended partly on the personal character of the emperor, but more on his power to select men fit to serve him as generals, secretaries, judges, since by these subordinates the business of the Empire was chiefly done. 1 Yet it is interesting to note, that on the military greatness of the bar- barian, Rome depended for her strength ; while the intellectual and moral superiority of the Roman bishops was to spread civilization through the wider barbarian world. CHRISTIAN EMPIRE UNDER ROMAN CONTROL. 73 So long as her soldiers remained true and obedient, and her lands productive, the Empire could hardly perish ; since, with money and troops, with the favor of the bishops who led opin- ion and of the officials who executed law, it possessed essential strength. But as her soldiery was drawn more and more from barbarian peoples, and so became less and less in sympathy with the habits and ideas of the Empire, and as, by slave-culture, absentee landlords, and a constantly increasing tax-pressure, the utility of her lands was gradually destroyed, the change of 476 was inevitable. The teacher must not allow the popular ideas of the ' ' Fall of the Roman Empire " to influence him too strongly in his views of this change, which was in its reality a change in the propor- tions of population, and a shifting of power rather than a con- quest. As soldiers and as laborers, the barbarians had long been entering the Empire, until, at 476, they composed the better and stronger part of her fighting and working people. For, as the love of leisure and pleasure had rendered the arduous labors of the camp distasteful to the Romans, these had fallen natu- rally to great warrior bands, who gladly entered a service so congenial to their love of warfare. So soon, however, as the strength of conscious organization was felt by armies practi- cally barbarian, they naturally demanded recognized place and power in the Roman territory and among Roman officials, nor was there any force to withstand them. Although, in reality-, political as well as military power had now passed into the hands of the Teutons, and the leadership of Western Europe was acknowledged to be theirs, still to a contemporary Roman this change could not have seemed so profound or startling as we now know it to have been ; he would have stated the superfi- cial apparent fact that through the weakness of the western gov- ernment and the influence of the soldiery of Odovaker, both parts of the Empire were again united under the eastern emperor, who had now commissioned barbarian generals not only with the command of the legions, but also with the political manage- ment of the western provinces. By the provincials, indeed, 74 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. such a change could not have been greatly deplored, since the Empire had become their oppressor rather than protector, and since, according to Salvian, at least (p. 248), many of them had already expressed their preference for barbarian rule. In all this, Rome but reaped as she had sown. The new ideals of life and morals, which entered Rome in the first century b.c, naturally culminated in such a picture as that drawn by Ammianus (p. 244) , and in the transfer of her power to the monk and the barbarian ; in other words, to men whose ideal was the self-denying saint, or the warrior who could die on the hard- fought field. Nevertheless, Rome had so long mastered the civilized world with law and the barbarian hordes with fear, that even in the midst of the weak confusion of the fifth century she seemed to the church the earthly prototype of the *'City of God," while barbarian ambition looked to her as the shining centre of the world, the proudest source whence it could win its titles of com- mand. This name that had gathered to itself for more than a thousand years all that the world contained of strength and beauty and order, did not easily lose its deeply rooted power ; a power that must be reckoned with at least to the days of Charlemagne. In considering the organization of the church, two funda- mental facts must constantly be remembered ; one is, that Christianity became the state faith of the Empire, the historical successor of Paganism.^ The old temples were turned into churches ; state privileges and revenues passed from the old orders of priests to the new ; the whole organized framework of the Empire, with its central powers at Rome or Constanti- 1 The extract given from the "City of God," p. 246, gives a curious illustration of the fact that, to the men of the fourth century, not only had one church and belief displaced another, but that actual supernatural powers, strong to work mischief to men, — deified evil spirits, in fact, — had been overthrown by the one true, beneficent God. Men no longer wor- shipped these old gods, but they still believed in them and feared them ai devils and demons. CHRISTIAN EMPIRE UNDER ROMAN CONTROL. 75 nople, with its municipalities acting as mediators between the provinces and the emperor, with its imperial Pontifex Maximus, with its network of roads and posts, became the framework of the church ; from this point of view, the church appeared like a centralized hierarchy. But this other fact must always be remembered, that the strong officials of the church, the bishops, owed their power to popular elections, so that the government of the church might be described as a democracy, acting through a strongly organized centralization. That Rome should become a more strongly pronounced centre than Constantinople is not surprising when we notice that Rorfie had not a single powerful, long-established cit}' in the west as her rival, unless we except Carthage, while Constanti- nople was the child of yesterday to Antioch, Alexandria, or Damascus. Again, the power of the emperors after Constan- tine more decidedly centred at the eastern than the western capital ; hence the power of the Roman bishop, left uutram- meled by the imperial presence, grew more freely and strongly than that of the bishop of Constantinople ; and again, the name of Rome carried with it through all the West a power of mighty and ancient tradition, in which the " New Rome," Constanti- nople, was entirely wanting. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — Complaint of a decurion. The power of the church at 476 a.d. compared with that of the Empire. Constantine and Julian. The political value of a fixed creed. Famous barbarians of the later empire. What had the barbarian to give to the Empire ? Journal of a Roman Christian, ransomed by St. Ambrose from the Germans beyond the Rhine. St. Anthony. What resemblances between the saint-ideal of the fourth and fifth centuries and the warrior-ideal ? The conquests of the church. Private reflections of Claudian on his patron Stilicho. Compare life at Rome, in the days of Ammianus, with that in the days of Cincinnatus. 76 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. II. BandC. THE WEST UNDER BAKBAEIAN OONTKOL; EMPIKE or OHARLEMAaNE. Summarize the studies, pp. 250-285, somewhat as follows : — CHRISTIAN EMPIRE, 470-814. — ODOVAKER- CHARLEMAGNE. Organization of State, 476-800 a.d. In East : Oriental despotism, centred at Constantinople. In West : Delegation or abandonment of imperial power to bishops of Rome. barbarian kings and generals in Spain, France, Italy, Britain, Africa.^ Organization of State under Charlemagne. Restoration of name and style of Western emperors. Union of spiritual and temporal powers of pope and emperor in " Holy Roman Empire." '^ Organization of Church. Development of centralized papal power. Development of monasticism {Benedictine order). Characteristics of Period in the Empire. Growing separation of East and West.^ 1 Ahhough this power was a delegated one, the barbarian leaders, as gen- erals of well-disciplined forces, held the actual military power of Europe ; while, as titled officers of the Empire, they gained the traditional power of its name; add to this that they were generally the chosen or hereditary native commanders of their armies. 2 The mosaic of St. John, in Lateran (p. 275), shows pictorially the fun- damental ideas that underlay this Holy Roman Empire. By their size and relative position pope and emperor appear as equals, inferior to their Lord Christ, from whom they take their different powers as his delegates on earth. The account of the "Crowning of Charlemagne " a<;ain (p. 274), clearly shows that to himself and the men of his day Charlemagne was the '•anointed of the Lord," and the source of his power divine, like that of the warrior-kings of Israel. ^ After the Mohammedan conquests we find Islam dividing, like the Roman Empire, into an eastern and a western part. Is it not possible that the old differences thus made themselves once more felt ? THE WEST UNDER BAliBARIAN CONTROL. 77 Favored by I difference in language ^ and culture. inability of East to hold and govern the West ; .*. imperial abandonment of Rome to ecclesiastic and barbarian control. Culminating in crowning of Charlemagne by pope, 800. Predominance of ecclesiastical power in the West. Caused or favored by imperial weakness and neglect, conversion of barbarians ^ (" conquests of Christian Emjjire"), — Goths. Vandals. ^ Irish. Franks. Burgundians. Saxons in England. Saxons in Germany (Charlemagne). Scotch, protective attitude of church toward poor and oppressed, monopoly of Roman civilization, centred in monasteries. Resulting or appearing in temporal power of popes and bishops, — political, military, legal and judicial. 1 Although modern languages began to assert themselves, still Latin was the tongue of the thinking and governing classes and the language of literature. 2 It is not generally sufficiently insisted upon that while the "barbari- ans " overran the Empire, Christianity almost at once permeated the bar- barians, thus subjecting the strongest peoples of Europe to the religious organization and faith of the later Empire ; this subjection was aided by the impression which the Roman Empire and the Roman church still made upon the barbarians through its splendor, wealth, and titles (see p. 273, Conversion of Clovis). 78 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Christian Empire. — Continued. development of asceticism, embodied Jn monas- tic organization, — idealizing self-denial and benevolwnce. opposing violence and selfishness^ encouraging labor and learning. union of West in faith, language, law. ideals (monastic, saintly), religious character of intellectual interests, civilizing influences (largely monastic) ia direc- tion of literature (chiefly monkish history and lit- erature), music.i law (humanizing it), industrial and decorative arts, science, morality and humanity, agriculture. Hindered by mixture and corruption of Christianity by paganism (demonology), and heresy, misunderstanding of its teachings {Clovis). Culminating in establishment of "Holy Roman Empire." Romanizing of the Teuton in religion — Christianity, language and literature, law. military tactics. agriculture and industry (monasteries). Provincial confusion and misery. Caused by weak government. barbarian attack, invasion, and change. 1 It will be noted that music, painting and the arts of decoration owe their modern impulse to the mcdiseval clmrch. THE WEST TJNDEU BARBARIAN CONTROL. 79 Saracenic invasion. prevalence of personal rather than territorial law.i Resulting in weakness of art and literature. corruption of Lathi (begins to change to French, Italian, Spanish), strengthening of Teutonic provincial governments. Growth of vital power in West, seen in production of great men (bishops and warriors), military and political vigor of the Teuton, 2 culminating in Charlemagne, appearance of Western tongues in literature, — English ^ French > indicating Irish ) intellectual advance of peoples, attempts at legal order. Rapid growth of Mohammedan faith and empire. Caused or favored by simplicity of belief. heretical disaffection of Egypt and Syria toward Constantinople.^ Resulting in imperial loss of Syria, — Damascus, Antioch. Egypt, — Memphis (Cairo), Thebes. Africa. Carthage. Checked by Spain. orthodox defenders, — Leo at Constantinople. Charles Martel at Touks. 1 According to personal law, a man is judged by the law of his own people, wherever he may be ; according to territorial law, he is judged by the law of the land in which he dwells, no matter whence he came. 2 This vigor had a double source, — the unbroken, warlike tastes of the Teuton and his heritage of Roman military tactics. ^ Compare the cases of Africa and Spain, which had been or were still under the power of Arians, who could easily accept the bare monotheism of Mohammed, 80 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. The points made from study to study in regard to Moham- medanism had better be tabulated, as far as possible, by them- selves, in order to preserve unity of view. The following is offered as suggestive : — THE SARACENS. Conquests, Religious. Government, Despotic Theocracy (Omar, Haroun ; see relation of palace and mosque, p. 281). Religious Doctrines. Monotheism. Divine inspiration of prophets, — Moses, Christ, Mohammed. of Koran, — revealed to Mohammed. Fore-ordained necessity of all events (fatalism ).i Immortality of the soul. Future rewards and punishments (of material sort).^ Religious Duties. Prayer, fasting. Alms-giving, pilgrimage. Moral life according to Moslem standards, which allows polygamy, .-. produces subjection of women, modified by natural and religious feeling, condemns drunkenness and gaming, condemns cruelty to animals, preaches charity,^ faithfulness, justice, resignation. Civilization, at first simple, pastoral, and religious (Omar), becomes highly artistic, scientific, and material (Haroun-al-Raschid), Centering at* Bagdad. Cairo. Damascus. Cordova. 1 To these doctrines are generally ascribed a good part of tlie lighting energy of the Saracenic forces. 2 The practical effect of this morality may be seen in the moderate treatment of Eastern Christians (see pp. 279, 280). * Note also the Mohammedan possession of Antioch and Alexandria, and of Assyria, Egypt, and Persia, with their old civilized centres. THE WEST UNDER BARBARIAN CONTROL. 81 Developing Moorish architecture and ornament, — horseshoe arch, dome (compare St. Sophia). minaret (spire), arabesque.^ trefoil and quatrefoil. scientific study of mathematics.2 astronomy. 2 medicine.2 philosophy (Aristotle), commercial intercourse of East and West, industrial and agricultural activity ; weaving, embroidery, metal-work, pottery, dyeing, inlaid work in wood and marble, horticulture, leather work (Morocco), manufacture of figured silk (damask). Springing from Greek and Oriental sources. Two things beyond all others marked this age. The first was the pervading and progressive power of religion ; in the West, the church predominated as a political and legal as well as an intellectual and moral influence ; in the East, political differences were confirmed by heresies, until at last all were alike swept away by the irresistible tide of Mohammedanism and its simple monotheistic faith. The second thing was the mixture of influences produced by the constant mixture of peoples ; the church gave to the barbarian the civilization as well as the faith of Rome, and her monks, travelling as mission- aries or envoys, from end to end of Europe, did much to create 1 The beauty of the arabesque, and of Moorish work in general, de- pends not only on the skilful and intricate mingling of symmetrical mathematical forms, but also upon delicate and brilliant combinations of color ; the former quality pleasing the mind, and the latter the sense. The strict observance of the second commandment having prevented any development of sculpture or figure painting, the whole artistic talent of the Moors was turned to the lesser arts of pure decoration, in which, per- haps, they have never been excelled. 2 Compare the Alexandrian civilization. 82 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. a united Christendom ; of these monks, there is no better type than Theodore of Tarsus, a Greek, sent by the Roman bishop to found the English Canterbury (p. 262). While the church penetrated the wilderness, the peoples of the wilderness con- stantl}' penetrated the Empire ; invasion, settlement, conversion, mingled old and new, culture and barbarism, good and evil ; the church alone being fixed, little by little mastered the con- fusion. Perhaps no one thing better showed the varied influ- ences of the time than AVestern law, which based itself alike on the written codes of Rome and on Teutonic custom, while both were modified by the ever-present advice and aid of the bishops. In the East, on the other hand, Islam was the mingling power, which carried rude pastoral tribes into ancient and highly civilized lands, whose finest culture they made their own, though ''with a difference," and whence they conveyed it to the farthest West, which was still inferior to the East in all material and artistic ways.^ In the West, the crowning of Charlemagne was the culmina- tion of the growing separation of the East and the West, of the developing temporal power of the Western church, and of the actual Teutonic as opposed to the nominal imperial rule ; for although the name of Roman emperor was heard again in the West, still the " Holy Roman Empire" embodied a revolt, and Charlemagne's title was usurped ; the new Empire covered new territories unknown to Roman rule, embraced the heart of modern Europe with the Rhine vallc}' for its centre, comprised new populations and tongues, held its power as the temporal arm of the church, and as a gift from its spiritual head. In ^ Historians often contend that the Moors had no original civilization, since they took their architectural and decorative " motives " from Con- stantinople, Damascus, or Persia, their science from Alexandria and Syria, their philosophy from Aristotle. Without insisting on a decision, it may be noted that they so advanced or modified or mingled what they took, that they left upon it such a distinctive mark of character as to demand a separate name for what is Moorish or Arabian. THE WEST UNDEK BARBARIAN CONTROL. 83 spite of these fuudamental differeuces, the tradition of Rome was still so strong as to force her name on any ruler who could pretend to hold the West together ; hence the value of receiving the imperial title from the Bishop of Rome, the only man left in Europe, except the Eastern emperor, who could be said to represent in historic line the authority of the ancient Empire ; thus received, too, the imperial title gained the sanction of religion, and the Empire could, as "Holy," claim the alliance of all Christendom ; from this time on, the names of Roman and Christian were synonymous in the West, and from this point of view we see the necessity which Charlemagne felt of convert- ing the Saxons before incorporating them into his empire. Although artistic, poetic, or pure intellectual genius was rare in this period, the fact was probably due to the circumstances of obscurity and confusion, which marked the time, since of greatness there was no lack, but it was a greatness that dis- played itself in action, feeling, and character rather than in vision. Nevertheless, I have chosen the motto on p. 228, be- cause, in spite of the clang and movement of the age, its real strength lay in quiet, germinal, partly unconscious powers, moving like leaven amid the troubled mass. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — " And after the fire, a still small voice." Clovis, patrician of Rome. What causes made the way of the Mohammedan conquests into the Empire compara- tively easy ? The strength of the pope. The visit of St. Augustine to Britain. Comparison of Augustus, emperor, with Charlemagne, emperor. Was the so-called " conversion " of the Saxons justifiable ? (Debate.) Why should Pope Gregory be called " Great " ? Reasons why a Goth became a Benedictine monk. Visit to Monte Cassino. Why should Justinian be the most famous emperor of this period? The Mohammedan bonds of union. The character of Omar. Journey of Theodore of Tarsus to England. The court of Charlemagne. Why should Charlemagne become the hero of western Europe? Compare Omar and Haroun-al-Raschid. 84 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. EUROPEAN HISTORY, 814-1880. INTRODUCTORY. Before the ninth centur}-, the centre of political interest lay at Rome or Constantinople ; but with the death of Charlemagne, the power of Rome began to fade, political interest began to gather about various national centres and national heroes, and the modern states of Europe began to appear in undefined and nascent forms. Within two centuries, France, England, Ger- many, Spain, and Italy were known and feared as powers. From that time on, the history of Europe has presented a complex, continuous development along original lines, though starting from those of antiquity. For this reason, the history of more than a thousand years is massed under the single title of European a-s opposed to Greek and Roman history. From the beginning through, the teacher should have well in mind tlie great trends and marks of the long and complex period. First, then, we have to do with constantly enlarging political areas. Cities are no longer the political units of history, but countries,^ and countries that grow first to their full natural boundaries in Europe, and then begin to possess and assimilate the lands of America, Asia, and Africa. Cities still exist, not as rulers, but as condensed centres of the popu- lation and labor of their various countries. Not only are the units larger^ hut they differ in their origin. In antiquity, the tribe, bound together by the tradition or reality of a common descent, was the original unit, which grew by successive adoptions of aliens. A group of related men formed the historic kernel of the state. From 800 on, a parcel of land possessing common interests forms this historic kernel, and 1 For this distinction I am indebted to Prof. J. R. Seeley. EUROPEAN HISTORY. 85 gradually draws its inhabitants together into the nation-unit^ which holds men together by attachment to a common father- land, as of old they were held together by attachment to a com- mon ancestor. A third point to be noted is the development of this unit. This parcel of land, held at first by many nobles, under the nominal lead of a king, is, during the mediaeval period, the cause of long and hard contention between its rival claimants. In the age of the Renaissance, this contention culminates in the formation of strong, centralized monarchies in France, England, and Spain ; while in Germany and Italy, a multitude of strong cities and rival princes rise, weakening their country in behalf of their separate individualities. In the modern period, both phases have given place in various ways to strong, united nations, tending more and more to popular constitutions, with a growing tendency to make the state the agent of all common service, in government, education, trans- portation, and even in more radical ways. The fourth and last point to be held in mind is that, along with this development of individual nations, has gone the development of a European commonwealth. By the constantly increasing complex of international relations, weaving together inextricably the interests of neighboring states, a Christianized, European, Aryan unit has been formed as against less civilized continents, held b}^ other faiths and peoples. These four points all relate to the political development of Europe; I have not thought it necessary to call special attention to the other marked tendencies of the whole period, such as the growth of knowledge and free thought, the devel- opment of a popular material civilization, the acquisition of freedom in various forms ; for while these movements are of the highest importance, they are easy to see and simple to understand. STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY, A. EAELT MEDiaiVAL PERIOD. —CHARLEMAGNE TO THE ORtJSADES, 814-1095. The studies from p. 291 to p. 318 inclusive may be summa- rized as follows : — THE CIVILIZED WORLD, 814-1095. Organizations of Period. Feudal units (fiefs), — bound together by loyalty, interest. possession of and residence on common land. forming weak monarchies in France. England. Spain. Italy and Germany. Holy Roman Empire, — temporal, imperial powers embodied in emperor, spiritual, sacerdotal powers embodied in pope. Oriental despotisms in Byzantine Empire, caliphates. CharacteristicB of Period. In feudal monarchies. Land, basis of power, seen in , change of law from personal to territorial. service of the inferior dependent on land-grants from the superior, theory that king is the land-owner of kingdom, government co-extensive with estates. Growth of landed aristocracy,^ with strong class-distinc- tions (great inequality). * Curiously enough, this aristocracy has survived in its purest feudal form in England, where it was at first constitutionally most subject to the king (from 1066 onward). EARLY MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 87 Decentralization of power, seen in wars of feudal lords against kings, control of kings by feudal lords, numerous feudal units, resulting in constant petty warfare (" Truce of God ") . Partial, arbitrary, and conflicting law.i Insecurity of trade. Loss of individual liberty. In Holy Roman Empire. Weakness of imperialism (no land). Power based on religious faith (see imperial style and title). Centralization of power in hands of pope, culminating in Hildehrand. Closer definition of German frontier, caused by invasion and threatened invasion. In Islam, Development of extravagant Oriental courts and mon- archies. Growth of a scientific, material civilization, based on Oriental and Greek culture. Formation of new Mohammedan powers, — Turkey in Asia. Egypt. In England. Royal power strengthened by constant foreign invasion, uniting king and barons and people into a nation, "immediate" oaths demanded by William the Conqueror.2 Growth of English independence of continent seen in literature (English). 1 Hence it often happened that in order to gain justice from a power- ful baron, it was absolutely necessary to employ force against him, since there was no executive strong enough to compel men to obey any general law, even were such a law in existence. 2 Before the time of William the Conqueror, the thanes seem to have had more constitutional power of interfering with general politics than the French barons. This power they seem to have retained while the "imme- diate " oaths demanded by William deprived them of absolute independence. 88 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. The Civilized World. 814-1095. — Continued. In general. Great confusion arising from barbarian invasions and attacks from Northmen in Sicily, Italy. France, England. Turks and Hungarians in Holy Roman Empire. Byzantine Empire. Islam, feudalism, causing insecurity of trade, insecurity of travel (pilgrims), little intellectual and artistic life, mixture of barbarism and civilization. Formation of new states and powers, — Hungary, Normandy, Austria,^ Prussia, ^ Kingdom of Two Sicilies, in Europe. Turkey 2 in Asia. General mixture of European blood, — in France : Roman, Kelt,^ Frank, Norman. in England : Kelt, Saxon, Normaiv. in Italy: Roman, Kelt, Greek, Lombard, Norman, Arab, in Spain : Kelt, Roman, Goth, Arab. 1 I have asked what would account for the long succession of strong rulers in these two states ; may not the answer be found in the fact that the founders of the Houses of Austria and Brandenburg were necessarily the picked men of their whole generation for vigorous physique and positive character ? 2 Compare the entrance of the Turks into Islam with that of the Teu- tons into the Empire. In both cases the conquerors were, in turn, subdued by the faith and culture of their subjects. * It should here be noted that previous to the Roman conquests the Kelts were the leading people in France, Spain, and England, while the/ had a strong hold on tlie best part of Italy. EARLY MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 89 Complete separation of East and West,i — in government: '■'■Holy Roman Empir-e." in religion: " Schisjn of the Church." Traces of Greek influence in West, seen in literature (John Scotus). architecture (St. Mark's). The church strongest power in Europe, — because of unity of government (strong papacy) . unity of language (Latin). unity of faith (new barbarian kingdoms, Christian), possession of civilization, — literature, art. law, industries, hold on the minds of men through fear of excommunication, .*. eternal damnation, democratic spirit and organization seen in relation to temporal powers (see titles of emperor and kings), assumption of military and governmental powers (see " Truce of God " and call to the crusades), prevalent impulse to pilgrimage. Traces of secularization, seen in tendencies of clergy to worldly pleasures and occupations, secular developments in literature, history, poetry, philosophy, etc. influence in temporal affairs. 1 This separation was inevitable from the first ; differences in language, culture, thought, style, had long been preparing the way for differences in faith and worship ; and when at last this difference became pronounced, and the " Holy Roman Empire " an established fact, no bond of union any longer existed between the parts of the Empire, and they broke apart as naturally as the ripe fruit falls. No effort on the part of pope or emperor or patriarch could any longer sustain even the name of union. 90 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. The Civilized World, 814-1095. — Continued. Tendency to revolt against the chui-ch, — in government (Investiture quarrels), in thought (John Scotus).^ Spirit of church, — humane, democratic (offices open to all classes ; see Hilde- brand). intolerant of heresy (requiring unity), reformatory, 2 — restoration of asceticism, celibacy of clergy required. The teacher cannot be too careful to have his pupils thor- oughly understand the feudal organization, since it is the great secular foundation of European society and politics from the days of Charlemagne onward, and onl3' began to lose its hold in the latter part of the seventeenth century. Its central fact was this, the union of political, military, and legal j^ower with the ownership of land; the land-owner was the land-?orcZ. In theory, the king was landlord over all. In need of men and money, he delegated his lands, and with them his powers to subordinate holders, who paid again by the use of land for service of body and purse. The possession of land was the measure of military and financial power ; at once, then, we see the cause of the weakness of the earl}' mediaeval king as against a combination of two or three strong barons ; we understand how the emperor, 1 Although both Anselm and Scotus both wished to found theology on sound reason, yet when the two were in conflict, Anselm taught that reason should yield to authority, while the bolder spirit of Scotus announced that authority itself was "derived from reason." The letter from the poju? concerning Erigena (p. 313) is interesting, as showing how thoroughly the former felt responsible for the purity of the faith, and therefore claimed the right to regulate European thought. 2 Of course this spirit was only felt by the strongest and best, and cul- minated in Hildebrand, whose measures were the logical outcome of his desire to save the churcli from the cares and burdens and pleasures of the world, in order that it might more effectually rule and help the world. EARLY MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 91 gaining his title as a successor of tlie old Roman emperors, whose power was supported b}' taxation, found himself in pos- session of the name of ruler alone ; for the feudal theory expected a sovereign "to live from his own," namely, lead his own vassals to war, and gain support from his own domains. The emperor, then, as emperor, had only such recognition as the temper and belief of the period might accord. From this point of view, we understand how important the question of investi- ture was to Henry lY., and how the emperor could only pre- serve imperial power in those countries where he was also king, in German}" and Italy, while France was practically lost to the Empire when she became an independent kingdom. As for the effects of feudalism on libert}', equality, peace, and unity, he who runs may read ; the effect on manners is more questionable. Guizot, in his History of Civilization, con- siders it good ; l)ut Ordericus Vitalis hardh" encourages such an opinion for this age ; during this period it is not safe, perhaps, to say much more than that class distinctions produce class manners, and that in a society of superiors and inferiors, for- malities will necessarily arise, with tendencies to condescension on one side and servility on the other. I have not called special attention in my Students' Edition to the resemblances between the Teutonic warrior band and the feudal unit ; the feudal lord is the chosen chief, his superior vas- sals are his bravest companions, who still are bound together by a common loyalty and a still stronger common interest, but whom he now rewards, not, as in Caesar's day, with spear and steed, but with permanent titles to land. In the feudal courts, again, we see the mark-moot, but with the all-important modification, that the war-leader has become a political and legal ruler, and thus destroys the village democracy ; while in the feudal code of justice we find each man still his own defender and avenger. The teacher, however, must act his own judgment as to how far he should discuss the origin of feudalism, since the facts on which any theory can be built are fragmentary. The extract given from Byrhtnoth's Death (p. 310) illustrates 92 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. primitive feudalism perhaps at its best. Here we see England invaded by a Danish warrior band, evidently attracted thither by the comparative wealth of the land, now long settled by an agricultural people. Against them is arrayed the feudal unit,^ led by Byrthnoth, who adds to sure confidence in the Christian faith, an English courage and determination to protect and keep his own. Nor are his followers unworthy of their chief ; when he is slain, they fight on as before, undismayed, while the very soul of bravery speaks in Byrhtwold's noble words, "Courage should be the greater, the more our forces lessen." Although the imperial power was inferior to the royal, from the feudal point of view, still the emperor held the power of the Roman name, a name which yet stood for the mightiest empire men had known, and for the language, law, and learning of the West ; again, he held the power of the Christian name, and as "Protector of the Catholic Faith" could demand the service and homage of all Christian men. In this latter regard, how- ever, he was the inferior of the pope, who was proved to be the strongest force in the Empire by the bitter strife of Hildebrand and Henry. How thoroughly the Empire was regarded as a sort of "church militant" is shown by the imperial title, which clearly marks the imperial office as that of a general of the faith, and by the fact that new peoples could only enter the Empire by acknowledging themselves the subjects of the church.^ While the church claimed a peculiar right to the imperial ser- vice, still in the call to the crusades the popes claimed a right to the arms of all Christendom in defense of the Christian faith, a claim which was not denied though often neglected. In fact, the boundary of civilized Europe was one with the boundary of Christian Europe. Throughout Europe the church was still the 1 Note the traces of Teutonic organization in this unit ; the loyalty to a loved chief ; the kinship bond ; the duty of vengeance. 2 Compare the case of Normans in France, who were, like the Hungari- ans, allowed to settle on condition of accepting Christianity. The weak- ness of civilized Europe is indicated by the fact that in both cases the invaders seize and hold most desirable territory. EARLY MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 93 prime civilizer ; the monasteries were still the centres of learn- ing and authorship ; Gerbert gave an impulse to science and mechanical industry ; the archbishops taught and advised the monarchs ; as new peoples were assimilated, they were per- suaded to the habits as well as the creed of Christianity; thus in Bulgaria we see the church opposing polygamy, superstition, and cruelty. Although there is little that is striking in the intellectual life of this age, there is much that is significant, since tendencies then began which culminated only in the Renaissance ; the Greek influence entered the West ; the courts of England and France became intellectual centres ; in England, France, and Spain national subjects or national languages appeared in liter- ature, and Italy already began to gain artistic and scientific leadership. Europe, however, was still too harassed by inva- sion, too confused by feudalism, to permit of great results in scholarship or thought ; her greatest names were still of warlike kings and chiefs, among whom the Normans appeared pre- eminent. Attention should be called to the fact that the Moorish civili- zation, which culminated in this age, was developed along lines marked out from the first. The Arabs were the latest heirs of the wisdom of the East as modified by the Alexandrian influ- ences ; they were the mediaeval authorities in astronomy, medicine, mathematics, and the Aristotelian philosophy ; but their own authorities were confessedly Ptolemy, Galen, Hippo- crates, Euclid, and Aristotle. It is of the greatest interest to note how, in St. Mark's and the Ducal Palace all influences built themselves in marble ; Greek and Oriental columns, Roman and Gothic arches, Orien- tal domes, Moorish ornament and color, all combined into a new beauty, neither Gothic, classic, nor Oriental, but Venetian, a beauty rich in detail and daring in cosmopolitan combination. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — The political power of a belief or myth, as illustrated by the " Holy Roman Em- pire." The " Marches " of the Empire. Of what use was the short- 94 STUDIES IN GENERAI^ HISTORY. lived empire of Charlemagne? The influence of foreign invasion or attack upon internal unity, as illustrated in the English and German history of this age. How a baron spent the day, 900 a.d. Same of a serf; a bishop; a king. What were the elements of Otto's power? What progress has been made by the barbarians during this age? The losses of Constantinople. Alfred the Great and Charlemagne. The Norman war-chiefs. A group at Charlemagne's court. What characters of the period had lives that deserve the terra "romantic"? Life in Normandy, 1000 a.d. The nobility of the age. Journal of Greek sent on an embassy to Bagdad. Gerbert in Spain. B. STUDY ON ORUSADING PERIOD. This study should be opened by a class conversation along the lines indicated by the questions on p. 318. The word *' divisions," in the first of these questions, refers to the feudal divisions indicated on the map, and named in the key, in the upper left-hand corner ; the most casual glance at them will show how feudalism had cut Western Europe into many petty little states, without specially natural boundaries ; nor will the teacher, perhaps, find a more suitable time than this in which to call attention to the natural boundaries of the various European states, and to the fact that countries like England, Spain, Italy, and France, become more quickly consolidated and defined than countries like Germany, which has no well- defined natural barrier eastward, and so must depend the more on fortresses and arms. If the teacher find himself behindhand with his work, but has been thorough with the precediug period, he may pass over this study very sketchily and hastily, since much of the work consists in the application to new circumstances of tendencies and organ- izations with which the student is already familiar. But enough attention must be given so that the relation of the crusades to the earlier and later mediaival period ma}- not be missed. As the Persian wars were to Greece, and the Punic wars to Rome, STUDY ON CRUSADING PERIOD. 95 SO were the crusades to mediaeval Europe, — an enlarging, enliv- ening movement, which brought young peoples into contact with ancient civilizations. Throughout his study the student should be encouraged to summarize his own results as far as possible. But this sort of work is rather difficult, and, with most classes, the teacher will find it well to watch his opportunity to give practice on easily classified material, such as the crusades furnish. He may ask his pupils to tabulate their work on the crusades, under the following heads : Comparison of Antagonists, Causes and Motives, Leaders and Instigators, Routes, Leading Events, Results, Uses and Effects. The results reached by the study on the whole period, however, will need a longer and more complex summary ; the following may serve as a guide : — CRUSADING PERIOD. New Organizations and States formed. "Orders of knighthood. ^ Latin ^ kingdoms of East, — Jerusalem. Edessa. Latin ^ Empire of Constantinople. Lombard League (of Italian cities) .^ Relative Conditions of Various European Powers. Papal and ecclesiastical power strengthening, seen in leadership and direction of crusades.* delegation of temporal power to ecclesiastics by crusa- ders. 1 Those points marked " a " are expected to be obtained from the mate- rial, pp. 325-329. 2 The use of this adjective "Latin" in connection with these new Eastern states is an incidental proof of the way in which the men of the West were still regarded as belonging to the Latin half of the Roman Empire, ^ Notable as the first important example of these city-leagues, so influ- ential in the later mediaeval history of the Empire. * This leadership gave the pope, for the time being, command of new material forces of men and money. 96 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Crusading Period. — Continued. •' Concordat of Worms," and other papal victories in Germany, interference in temporal affairs, as in conquest of Ireland. quarrel of John of England with his barons, "continued monopoly of art and literature. Imperial power weakening, seen in " Concordat of Worms." new and successful opposition of cities, — Italy. Germany, battle of Bouvines. Royal power strengthening in France, ^ through union of king and people against barons (note Bouvines). acquisition of new land by king.^ Development of municipal power, seen in successful strife of cities with emperor, burgher victory of Bouvines. Characteristics of Age. French leadership in crusades.^ Uneasiness under papal and ecclesiastical rule, seen in strife of Guelph and Ghibelin. attempt of Arnold of Brescia. ^ The royal power was also growing stronger in England, but not so evidently, since what had been gained against the pope and barons by preceding kings, was temporarily lost by John. 2 Normandy would, in any case, have finally come to France, to w^hich it naturally belonged, both by geographical position, and by unity of speech and general civilization. ^ The French became the natural leaders of the crusades, because there was no serious disaffection in France against the pope, such as had been developed in Germany by the investiture quarrels ; moreover, the French were the oldest and most securely Christianized people of the West, not even excepting Italy, since the Normans in the South, and the Lombards in the North, were later acquisitions to the faith than the war- riors of Clovis. The fact of their predominance in the crusades finds an interesting confirmation in the Eastern use of the name " Frank " for all Europeans. STUDY ON CRUSADING PERIOD. 97 investiture quarrels in Germany. France. England, heresies of Southern France, — Albigenses; Waldenses. affair of Thomas Beket. Gradual loss of crusading energy, seen in indifferent or irrelevant results of later crusades, greater inducements offered to later crusaders (see p. 332). doubt felt at Antioch. caused by ill success in East. growing acquaintance with dangers and difficul- ties of undertaking, loss of horror for the Infidel. Constant contact of Greek, Oriental (^Moorish), and Latin civilizations. "Growth of intellectual energy, "centering at Paris (Abelard). Cordova (Averroes). Bologna, monasteries, "seen in widening circle of intellectual interest,— theology, law. medicine, philosophy, history, growth of French as a literary language. Tendencies of Crusading. To weaken feudalism through unredeemed mortgages on feudal land, destruction of knights in crusades, .*. relative weakness of noble class in numbers, tending 98 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Crusading Period. — Continued. To strengthen kings. cities. church (increasing its property by mortgaged or deeded lands of crusaders). To create new routes and demands for trade. To increase knowledge, — geographical. commercial and industrial. historical. To introduce Oriental products and luxuries to the West. To increase respect for and value of industrial pursuits and artisan class. If the teacher choose, he may add still another heading, Effects of Crusading ; ,this, however, can only be filled out after the student has done the work on the later mediaeval period. (See p. Ill of this manual.) On comparing the West and the East at the opening of the crusades, it is easy to see that the West was comparatively still uncivilized ; in the military art, the siege of Antioch had much to teach the crusaders, who were as yet unaccustomed to invest walled cities ; in comparing the various captures of Jerusalem by Omar, by the first crusaders, and by Saladin, the Moslems are seen to be the more humane ; ^ while the impressions of the astonished crusaders show how unaccustomed they were to the aspect of cultivated lands, and of cities strongl^'-built and adorned with the beauties of art. From this astonishment the Venetians were exempt, accus- tomed as they were to trade eastward ; to them, the crusades gave a chance for a great speculation, from which they gained 1 Some excuse may be found for the crusaders in the general hostility of all Christians against the Jews, as being the people at whose hands Christ suffered death. It was evidently the belief of many of the first crusaders that it was a part of their duty to massacre tliese unfortunate people, wherever found. STUDY ON CRUSADING PERIOD. 99 not only new wealth and territory, but also a chance to plunder from Constantinople some of those " monuments" whose value they understood somewhat better than did their rude compan- ions. It is significant of their long trading habits that they fur- nished neither men, money, nor ships, " for the love of God," without due recompense in pay or booty ; and their bargaiji with the crusaders would show how considerable and wealthy a power Venice had already become, even if the rich beauty of St. Mark's and the Ducal Palace did not furnish material evi- dence of the fact. The whole story of Thomas Beket, to its every detail, is very significant of the age; the main facts, given on p. 323, show at once the legal and political influence of churchmen, and the tendency of the age to revolt against this temporal power where it clashed with national government and unity ; while in Beket's saintship and Henry's penance we see the still predominating hold of the spiritual power of Rome. But,* strong as the church was growing, developing along the lines marked out b}' Gregory, it is significant that the revolts against her grew more frequent and daring, although, as yet, their most serious effort was to check her assertion of legal and political power. Intellectual revolt was still rare, and when it appeared, as in Southern France, was speedily suppressed in the interests of that unit}" of belief so essential to the papal power. The appeals of Pope Urban, and still more the Papal Bull issued for the second crusade, are convincing proof that the crusading energy was due in part to other motives than those derived from desires to avenge the enslaved, persecuted, or murdered pilgrims, save Jerusalem from the infidel, and make of Palestine a Christian kingdom. That these motives were strong is seen in the enthusiasm with which Urban's appeal to them was met ; but they were strengthened by the love of adventure, the passion of warfare, the hope of salvation, the desire for plunder, the charm of license, and in many cases, perhaps, by the power which was given to escape from the bur- dens of debt and the legal consequences of crime. On Saladin's 100 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. side, also, the motives were undoubtedly mixed ; but that they had a strong element of religious fervor, is clearly to be felt from Saladiu's letter (p. 334). The power of faith, even when it appears in the form of superstition, receives a striking illustration from the story of the " Sacred Lance," which, for the time being, served as well as if it had had genuine supernatural virtue, inasmuch as it gave absolute confidence, and all the strength which such a confi- dence inspires, to the weary and doubting crusaders. The whole period is marked by no great distinguishing ten- dency or characteristic ; it is a time of action in which old forms and ideas are tried, while new ones are suggested, — an age at once of culmination and of obscure, but originating change. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — The geo- graphical advantages of England. The geographical disadvantages of Poland. Reflections of a Bulgarian upon the crusaders. Journal *of a follower of Godfrey of Boulogne. The Christianity of Saladin. A French crusader's account of the taking of Antioch. Richard the Lion-heart, considered as an English king. When was the whole Roman Empire under " barbarian " rule ? How would a crusader have justified the massacre of the Jews? What would be the natural relation of Moslems and Jews? What facts given in lists, pp. 325- 329, prove this relation to have existed? Proofs that the civilization of the West was still Roman. LATER MEDIEVAL PERIOD. , , -JOl C. LATER MEDI51VAL PERIOD, 1215-1492. The following summary embodies the general results to be obtained from the studies on this period : — LATER MEDIAEVAL PERIOD. Organizations of Period. Feudal kingdoms growing into centralized national units by increase of royal power (consolidation and enlargement of royal domains), summoning to one place and for one purpose the assem- blies of estates, — nobles, clergy, commons, — merchants (in England and on the continent), landed proprietors outside the noble class (in England), formation of national codes, — St. Lewis. Edward I. Alfonso of Castile, foreign wars : ex. Spanish wars with Moors, wars of English and French. The Empire ^ (Italy and Germany) greatly weakened and disin- tegrated by grants to nobles and clergy, strife of Guelph and Ghibelin. "great interregnum." loss of Poland, loss of Sicily. formation of Swiss league, formation of city leagues against nobles, — Hanse. Rhine. 1 The imperial name at this time furnishes an excellent illustration of a " dignity" since it still held the respect of men by its antiquity, associa- tions, and traditions, while all its real power was rapidly vanishing. 10^ STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Later Medieval Period. — Continued. wars and disturbances throughout Germany, wars and leagues of Italian cities. The church, thoroughly centralized hierarchy, culminating in papal office, — powerful through unity, obtained by persecution of heresy (Inquisition), censorship of literature, independence of secular courts and impe- rial election. 1 wealth (note cathedrals), command of military orders, command of learning, judicial power. presence in assemblies of estates (political power), privilege and rank (the untaxed second estate). electoral nature of papacy. ^ threatened by " Schism of the West." growing tendency to heresy. growing dissatisfaction, most pronounced in Ger- many and England, with ecclesiastical govern- ment, doctrine, and morality, seen in attitude of kings. German electors, popular literature. Lollard and Hussite movement, heresies. The guilds, democratic, local, co-operative societies of the third estate (merchants and artisans), — formed for mutual protection and aid. advancement of trade, .*. favorable to morality, peace, public health and cleanliness, high standard of workmanship, and 1 Since the papal election was transferred to the College of Cardinals. 2 The papal office was thus freed from the chances of birth and the family quarrels to which an ordinary monarchy is subject. LATER MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 103 opposed to monopolies. inequality of advantage or opportunity, united by bonds of mutual interest, kinship (often).i The towns, democratic,^ local governments, power based on wealth. bonds of union, common local interests, common residence, opposed to irregular, arbitrary, and outside interference in local affairs, favoring local independence, trade. Orders of knighthood. Their duties, — to defend the church -y to defend the king >• military, to defend the weak and defenceless ) to hold to the Christian faith to be loyal to their king to do justice • to be honorable, courteous, brave, humble, truthful, persevering Characteristics of Period Special to England. Prosperity of farming gentry (stock-farmers, raising sheep), seen in presence in third estate, tax on wool. Successful establishment of constitution (compare with result of constitutional struggle in France), embodied in 1 The guild privileges were freely open to the sons and daughters of guildsmen ; the trades thus became largely hereditary. 2 Within the hodtj of citizens, democracy was the ruling principle ; but this body could not be said to include men of what has been called the fourth estate. spiritual and social. 104 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Later MEDiiEVAL Period. — Continued. Great Charter, demanding ^ " No taxation without representation." jury trial (judgment by peers). *' Habeas corpus " (no delay in justice). Characteristics Special to France. Strife of king and towns and nobles, ending in victory of king over nobles, and accompanied by steady enlargement of royal domain.^ substitution of king's law for trial by battle and arbitrary judgments. Close relations with papacy, seen in papal offer of Sicily to Anjou. removal of papal seat to Avignon. Characteristics Special to Spain. Superior strength of royalty (large domain). Characteristics General through "Western Europa Growing prosperity of middle trading-classes, seen in formation and powers of third estate, formation and powers of guilds, buildings and defenses of towns ; political and military power of towns, evinced in Flemish and Parisian revolts, wars of Italian towns, formation of powerful leagues. taxes imposed on third estate (wool-tax in England), growing prominence of manufacturing industries. Growth of nationalities, displaying itself in differentiation of language, history,^ intellectual interest, and in codifica- tion of national law. 1 These demands indicate the directions in which Englishmen had felt oppression. 2 This enlargement, of course, under the "Old Regime," meant the enlargement of the king'* resources. Here we see the special reason why the desire for territorial possession should be the moving cause of the long wars of the French and English kings. * It will be noted that, from the time of the crusades on, the history of Europe cannot be treated in the mass, since each country begins its own proper development. LATER MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 105 Strife of the nearly balanced powers of towns, kings, nobles, popes, resulting in multiplicity of def enses,^ — castles, town walls. victories of towns and princes in Germany and Italy. royal victory in France, general instability and insecurity. Growth of popular ^ liberty (as a purpose or a fact), seen in growth of electoral principle in towns, guilds. College of Cardinals, electors of Empire, attempts at political independence or liberty, — Cola di Rienzi. Marcel, demands of estates in England, France, and Spain, increase of local freedom (towns), participation of all classes in literary and artistic movements, favored by needs of kings for money from the third estate, growing intelligence of people. Social uneasiness and agitation among those of the lowest class (fourth estate), seen in Jacquerie. Wat Tyler's revolt. Hussite War. 1 Compare with the standing armies of the nearly balanced powers of Europe to-day. 2 It must, however, be remembered that the word "popular" does not apply to men below the station of the third estate. 106 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Later MEDiiEVAL Period. — Continued. Intellectual and artistic activity among all classes.^ seen in t poetry \ literature -3 history >- , Italy and England leading. ( travels ) theology and philosophy, France leading, science, Italy leading, — confused, undifferentiated, aiming at prolonging life and renewing youth, changing other metals to gold, foretelling the future. laying foundations for chemistry J (^j^hemy). mineralogy > astronomy (astrology), painting and sculpture (led by Italy and Ger- many), — original ^ in subject (Biblical), architecture (led by France and Germany), — original in structure (pointed arch, Gothic), in decoration (stained glass), influenced by Greek, Roman, and Moorish forms, learning (universities), Italy and France leading, heresies, inventions, patrohized by church, princes, and wealthy merchants. 1 Here, as in political life, " all classes " refers to the three estates, the lowest class not yet appearing as an intellectual or social element in the state. 3 Following out the lines indicated by the early church. LATER MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 107 influenced by Moors, in science, philosophy, and art. Greeks, in science, philosophy, and art. Romans, in law and literature. rendered influential and general by printing and engraving. comforts and contrivances for giving men leisure, comfort, and quiet, characterized by European interchange of thought and knowledge. versatility and variety. Organization, — of tendencies, occupations, classes ; of chivalry in knighthood, faith in new monastic orders, learning in universities, trades in guilds, classes and occupations in estates, — nobles. clergy. third estate. Centralization, — of feudalism in kings, of the church in papacy, of third estate in town organizations. Growth of new ideals, — the knight, the " Doctor." the wealthy merchant, the author and artist. It should be thoroughly understood that the assemblies of estates were quite different from our modern legislative bodies. The interests they represented were those of classes, not of the whole people ; they were called together at the will of the mon- arch, and primarily in his interest, either because he wished their advice, their moral support, or their money. Naturally, then, they were composed of the rich, influential, and intelli- gent classes, and included the third estate, not as a matter of justice, but because this estate contained the wealthy merchants, and could bring to the royal service a heavy purse. Originat- ing thus in the needs of the monarchs, the estates, especially the 108 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. commons, found a means of enforcing attention to their claims, and of winning new privilege and political importance. In other words, the king often found himself obliged to buy their aid ; thus, in England, he paid for it by charters, favors, and promises, tending to give wider liberties and juster govern- ment ; in France, the history was the same, but there the king's strength finally proved superior to that of the estates ; and thus, while in England, Magna Charta laid the foundation of constitutional government, in France the equally wise demands of Marcel and the Parisians ended in the triumph of royalty. To the modern student, the subject of guilds is of especial interest, since it was the mediaeval solution of the ' ' labor prob- lem," and a solution not merely successful, but brilliant. Their study is at once so easy and so suggestive, that the teacher will find in it an admirable place for much conversational work, such as would grow out of the question as to the value to the guilds- men of morality, peace, public health, and cleanliness. In talking this over, the teacher should be careful to keep in mind the tradesman's point of view ; for each of these conditions had its own special value to the trader and artisan, as ensuring him quiet and favorable conditions for work, while at tlie same time they rendered his place of labor or residence secure and attractive to the buyer. For the same reasons we find that, in the assemblies of estates, the third estate always inclined to vote for peace rather than war. The most vital point of the guild organizations was this : they ivere built upon the x>rinciple of co-operative instead of upon that of competitive industry. All the men of the same calling within the same town- walls, worked together for a common good, inspired by common interests, and by a common pride in the honor and excellence of the guild. Thus, in their relation to the outer world, the}' may be described as monopo- lists of labor, since no man could successfull}' follow any busi- ness outside the ranks of a guild ; within those ranks, however, monopoly, and even a disproportionate command of men and other means of labor, were strictly prevented. LATER MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 109 The power of the guilds evidently underlay that of the towns, those great mediaeval fortresses of labor, whose increasing re- sources caused the comparative decline of the noble class, and acted as a check on needy kings, who were glad to buy the right of taxation with charters of liberty. These charters plainly show that the towns had suffered much from the arbi- trary judgments and irregular interference of kings and nobles, and that liberty meant to them the power to judge and manage in regard to their own local affairs. Hence we see why the towns always favored the power of kings rather than that of nobles, since the former at least represented a central, stan- dard authority. The success of the trading-class, and the quickening of popu- lar thought, could hardly fail to rouse the consciousness of the great " fourth estate," composed of untrained laborers. This class, both in England and in France, now first urged its w^ay into notice by bloody, unintelligent, and ineffective revolt. There is an indication that this class was more intelligent in England than in France, in the fact that Wat Tyler and his followers appealed to the king as the fountain of justice, while the ' ' Jacquerie " was a blind protest made in fire and murder ; this, of course, is but conjecture, and I have called attention to the point chiefly for the sake of making the student realize the difference between an indication and a proof. But while revolt accomplished nothing for the poorest class of all, the ''Black Death" did much to free man from the soil, and change the serf into a wage laborer.^ At a moderate calcula- tion, a third of the people perished by this plague ; in conse^ quence, labor was so scarce, that the surviving laborers were able to enforce their demands for money payments, or for higher wages. This movement is, however, important to 1 The slave could be bought and sold at the will of his masters ; the serf could only be bought or sold with the land which he cultivated, and the home where he lived ; the wage laborer is bound neither to a man nor a field, but sells his labor as freely as the circumstances of the market permit. 110 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. notice, as a beginning of the long agitations of the laboring classes, rather than as a strong mark of this period. Woven tlu'oughout the texture of European society, the eccle- siastical power saw itself threatened with dismemberment, as distinct nationalities began to gather about new centres, and Rome began to be forgotten as the common mother. The unit}- of the church, and its traditional relations to the temporal powers, was diametrically opposed to the formation of independent kingdoms within the bod}' of Christendom ; this, as well as the legal power of the church, and the ecclesiastical control of large amounts of land, tlu-eatened the peace and unit}' of states. Thus the inevitable conflict of the temporal with the spiritual power approached, and most rapidly in Germany, where the conflicting claims of pope and emperor had already caused centuries of conflict and confusion. The whole period is marked by the strife of nearly balanced powers ; but classes, rather than nations, were the opposing forces ; the noble checked the king, and the town checked both, while obscure but significant movements were felt in still lower strata. If "number is quality," then these centuries should rank high in human history for their great number of famous men. Not only is the list a long, but a varied one, and in this regard it contrasts curiously with the lists of the Christian Empire and the early mediaeval period, which belong to a one-sided development correspondingly intense. Men were now trained for achievement not only in the cloister, but in the camp, the court, the workshop, and the studio ; and it is interesting to note that, perhaps without exception, the training had a direct relation to the man's life-work. Even before the invention of printing, the increasing wealth and culture of laymen is evidenced by the production of a great secular literature in the various national tongues of Europe ; the subjects of this literature reflect the learning, the thought, the feeling of the age ; and such a list as that of Caxton*8 first editions is an admirable index to the intellectual LATER MEDI-^VAL PERIOD. Ill life of the time, since it gives a practical gauge of literary popularity. This period is so alive and complete, so full of old powers waning and new ones waxing, that it is perhaps impossible to say, with any certain t}-, just what part of its new life Europe owed to the crusades ; it is easy to reason out relations be- tween these movements and the new impulses in science, art, and trade ; but such reasoning must always be tempered by the memory of the Moors in Spain, and of the close relations of the East with Venice and the other great Italian marts. In the study on p. 378, I have tried to show in some detail how pictures may be used in the study of histor}-. In a, 6, c, d, we see an architecture quite different from that of Greece, or Rome, or the East ; the spire, the pointed arch, the tower, have succeeded the pillar, the rounded arch, and the dome ; the basis of decoration is found in the openings of the walls, in the windows and doors ; stained glass has become an important material in decorative art, while its subjects are drawn from Christian scripture and tradition ; in the portal (c) the forms emploj'ed are again the forms of human beings, as in the Greek temple, but the forms are now of saints, and not of athletes. And yet throughout we see the influence of the earlier civilizations ; the Greek pillar, the Roman arch, the Moorish ornament, are all present, but modified and subordi- nated by a new spirit, expressing itself in an architecture essentially new. The most Gothic of these four pictures, the most purely original to this period, is, perhaps, c ; and yet even there the presence of some little Greek pillars, used as part of the decoration, betraj's the ineffaceable influence. As for the beauties of a, 6, c, and d, every one must judge for himself; such structures at least proclaim the wealth of the church, and its close relation with and command over the artistic resource of the age. The castles, as well as the cathedrals, bear their witness. Comparing e and/ with Fountains Hall, p. 413, we realize at once that the world had suffered change between the days when 112 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. a noble built his castle on a forbidding height, surrounded it by inhospitable moats, challenged all comers before giving them the narrow passage of the drawbridge, shut himself within thick walls, peeped suspiciously at the outside world through high and narrow slits, kept guard and watch on his castle towers, — and the days when this same knight made himself a pleasant house in the open country, with generous doors and windows, and surrounded it with the attractions of wood and field and garden ; the castle was the necessary product of an age when each man stood on his own defence, while Fountains Hall was built in an age of kings, when the feudal quarrels had been suppressed, and the military resources of the country were massed in a single hand, thus rendered strong enough to keep the peace, and enable men to live more freely and care- lessly than before. The third estate, meanwhile, is represented by such noble guild-halls as that of Ypres, p. 377, which, were it our only evidence, would tell us of the wealth, importance, and taste of the merchant class, besides giving us a very good list of the in- dustries of the age. The study of laws often tells us quite as much of injustice as of justice ; that is, a law generally tells us of some unjust or unfortunate state of affairs which it was intended to obviate. Thus, Magna Charta clearly indicates that the English king had made excessive and arbitrary demands for money, had seized men's property for his own use, had over-ridden the ancient liberties of the towns, had sold and delayed justice ; that the nobles had unreasonably oppressed their retainers for more than the customary feudal dues ; that no man was safe from arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, and that men were often condemned without a fair hearing. Magna Charta is sometimes represented as the work of the great nobles, but that it equally represented the third estate of free, untitled men, is proved by articles 20, 46, 48, p. 379. In the parallel French demands (p. 381) we see also the union of the nobles and com- mons against the arbitrary power of the king. LATER MEDIEVAL PERIOD. 113 pp. 380, 381, we see the royal power evidently directed to quell the power and violence of the nobles, and for this purpose allying itself with the commons of the realm ; while e, p. 382, shows the result of this struggle in establishing a monarchy possessing unchecked control over the composition of the army and the raising of the taxes, and thus enabled to become a genuine absolutism. Thus, while England advances in political civilization, and finds herself possessed of advanced constitutional principles, tending to work themselves out in practical forms, France finds herself retrograding toward the simpler form of absolute monarchy. The laws on p. 383 are rather indicative of social than politi- cal conditions ; we see a state dependent for defense on the arms of its free citizens, acting as volunteers ; a country still insecure, uncleared, and full of disorder ; a city where all politi- cal power is in the hands of traders, while two of these ordi- nances throw a curious light on the sincere interest and belief of the age in the experiments of alchemy. The literature of this period indicates clearly enough that its wrongs and abuses sprang chiefly from two classes, the aristo- cratic and the clerical; the nobles were the oppressors, — the monks, the scandals of the age ; the arbitrary; petty wars, the confused and unequal laws, which had their origin among the former, the extravagance, luxury, and immorality of the latter, called forth much complaint and invective, humorously voiced by Chaucer, but sternly by Dante, whose feeling was intensified by his identification with the Ghibelins^ in the long mediaeval strife of papal and imperial powers. Chaucer gives us the picture and the temper of the later mediaeval period, while Dante gives us its serious feeling and thought. In the extracts, pp. 386-388, the condition of the Holy Roman Empire is vividly set forth. We see at once that, in Dante's mind, the ancient union still existed ; but that its ruinous condition was attributed to the imperial neglect of Italy and the seizure of the temporal power by Rome. 1 In his youth Dante had been a Guelph. 114 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. In the extracts from Chaucer we see how thoroughly the early mediaeval saint ideal of the church had given way to desires for politeness, culture, pleasure, and luxury ; while the warrior ideal of the Teuton has softened to the "very perfect, gentle < knight," in fact, to the ideal ''''gentleman" and the gay young squire, thoroughl}^ trained for the graceful accomplishments of the court, as well as the strenuous duties of the field. ^ If the teacher himself regard this age a "dark" one, he may find means of impressing this opinion on the minds of his pupils ; to my own view, it appears as one of the most rapidly- moving and important of historical epochs. While England led in politics, Italy in art, and France in courtesy and mate- rial elegance, still the whole of Europe " marched," its various states essentially abreast. Suggestions for Examination and Essay "Work. — The guild and the trades-union ; their resemblances and differences. The assem- blies of estates and modern representative chambers. Review the development of papacy. The town aristocrats. Why should the trading classes desire the suppression of the nobility? What were the great historic sources of the civilization of this period. Why should the houses in European towns, dating back to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, be so built that the people must live in the second and third stories ; and why should the streets of those same towns be so narrow? What reasons would a man living in the fifteenth century have for thinking the ruin of Europe near? What reasonable grounds might he see for improvement? Journal of a Parisian merchant living in the first half of the fifteenth century. Same of a French noble. Same of an English wool-grower for latter half of the same century. The advantages of kings to trade. Wiclif and St. Francis of Assisi compared as reformers. The debt of the later mediaeval period to Rome. To Greece and the Orient. The secularization of the church. A day in the castle of Pierrefond. "Piper's day" at castle St. Ulric. The mediaeval versus the Greek beauty. ^ Compare the Hst of the squire's accomplishments with the list now required for an " accomplished " young lady. In both cases the education is a social one. REFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE ERA. 115 D, EErOEMATION AND EENAISSANOE ERA. The general results of the studies in this period may be thus summarized : — REFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE, 1492-1648. Great Movements and Achievements of the Time. Geographical discovery, — eastward, led by Portugal, westward, led by Spain, caused by desire to discover routes to India, desire to gain new landed possessions, resulting in circumnavigation of Africa, foundation of European colonies in India, discovery and settlement of America, development of maritime powers, — ^ Holland. Spain. Portugal. England. France, great increase of commercial activity, change of commercial centre from Mediterranean to Atlantic,^ .-. decay of Italian commerce. 1 Note that Spain held as strong a command over all the westward com- merce of the Mediterranean as Constantinople over that of the Black Sea ; this, combined with her own free access to transatlantic shores, made her one of the leaders of the new commerce. "Without this command, France, Portugal, England, and Holland had the freedom of access ; and in the case of Holland, her connection with Spain during the period of discovery very probably gave her her first commercial experience and impulse, strengthened by her own half-maritime life and the poverty of her inter- nal resources. 2 The opening of the Suez Canal in our own time may tend to restore the commercial activity of the Mediterranean lands < 116 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Reformation and Renaissance. — Continued. Revolt against the church, caused or favored by intellectual dissent from her doctrines (England and Europe in general), desire of monarchs for entire independence (England), disapproval of her methods and morals (Germany and Europe in general), internal corruption, — • avarice, luxury, immorality, ignorance, mediaeval quarrels of church and state > ^ independence of Teutonic character ) resulting in formation of national churches, formation of various Protestant sects, internal reform (the Jesuit movement). Production of masterpieces, — in painting, Italy, Germany, in dramatic literature, England. Overthrow of the feudal monarchy in England, caused by taxation without representation. ^ intolerance toward dissenting sects.^ For results, see next period (note colonizations). Facts of Organization. Formation of the strong centralized feudal monarchies of th* " Old Regime " in France, in England, in Spain. ^ The first of these grievances evidently antedated Magna Charta; while the second began to be oppressive under Elizabeth ; constitutional measures on the part of the king, and tolerance on the part of the people, might have averted the Civil Wars. REFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE ERA. 117 brought about by consolidation of lands in royal hands, through inheritance, conquest, marriage, formation of standing armies, common interests of king and people in religion, commerce. Formation of independent national churches in England. Scotland. Switzerland, various German states. Formation of national units (France, England, Spain), bound togther by language, faith. loyalty to a single king. common interests of natural geographical units, represented by national, hereditary monarchs. Foundation of extra-European, Christian colonies in Asia, in America. Weakness and disintegration of the Empire,^ seen in difficulty in quelling peasants' war. territorial gains of France and Spain, at the ex- pense of the Empire, along the Rhine, in Italy, sovereign political power held by princes. peace of Westphalia, caused by inherent weakness of imperial office, dissensions of Catholics and Protestants. 1 Under Charles the Fifth, who was such an extensive land-owner by his ancestral heritages, the Empire temporarily revived. 118 STUDIES m GENERAL HISTORY. Reformation and Renaissance. — Continued. culminating in Thirty Years' War. imperial loss of Switzerland. Holland.i loose confederation of sovereign states, nominally under the emperor. Characteristics of the Age. Leading interests, religion, and trade, seen in r civil wars of France, Germany, causes of war > J England, treaties of peace > ' 1 " Great Armada." ^ Thirty Years' War. objects of Columbus and other explorers, missionary enterprise, religious intolerance, literary productions, — translations of Bible, popular satires, artistic subjects. Change of the noble from a military to a courtly and cultured class, caused by massing of political and military power in royal hands, employment of gunpowder and standing armies, resulting in their appearance in literature. art. adventure.^ use of feudal wealth in art and display. Dissatisfaction of the fourth estate, seen in German peasant wars, outcry against enclosures in England. 1 Italy went piecemeal, being common booty for France, Spain, and Austria, from the opening of the sixteenth century till the days of Victor Emmanuel. 2 Note the earl^ leader? of discovery. REFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE ERA. 119 Intense and varied intellectual activity, seen in Reformation movement, revival of learning, — Latin language and literature. Greek language and literature, favored by Reformation.^ new forms of literature, — drama, essay. romance, revolt against, Aristotle ^ in Platonic movement, inductive philosophy of Bacon, study of natural science. ^ appeal to reason and observation as bases of truth.'* Increase of domestic comfort and safety. Strong influence of classic antiquity, seen in art. education. literature (translations, imitations, themes). International action and reaction, seen in international w^ars. ' * importation or travel of artists from country to country, translations. 3 Italian influence in English literature.^ on French manufacture. 1 The same intellectual impulse which urged men to the study of nature in science, urged them to the study of the Greek and Hebrew originals in theology. (See Luther's letter, p. 424.) 2 The first two statements are in reality but particulars under the third, which marks the age in religion, art, and thought. The original source, be It the revealed truth, the natural form, or the untranslated classic, is the object of desire. In this desire, Italy herself led, though it was beyond her power to achieve. ^ The translations of the great works of antiquity and of the Middle Age undoubtedly had their influence in unifying Europe, since they gave her a common body of literary material from which to start, — an in- fluence greatly facilitated by the new invention of printing, which likewise quickened the influence of one country on another, as of Italy on England. 120 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. It has been the custom, in many of oui' text-books, to date the beginning of modern history at 1453, or at 1492 ; but al- though new elements then appear, still the great events, the characteristic forms of the Renaissance, seem to be the culmi- nation of the whole feudal, mediaeval period. From the long struggles of king and baron, strong-handed monarchies emerged ; from the long quarrels of temporal and spiritual powers within the Empire, and the long-felt intellectual revolt against an ancient, detailed creed, the Reformation sprang ; Columbus was the greatest of a line of daring Italian travellers and navigators who prepared his way ; in Raphael and Michael Angelo, bloomed the Christian art which Italy had never failed to cherish through all her mediaeval confusion.^ Meanwhile, the absolutely new, the modern impulses that began in these centuries did not characterize them, but awaited their development in a later era. For these reasons, then, it has seemed best not to use the word "modern" nntil 1648 be passed, and to treat this period as the climax of that Catholic and feudal civilization which had slowl}- formed the states of Europe during the mediaeval age ; the m9re so since such a view gives significance and meaning to all the struggles, imperfections, and confusions necessary to develop the strong, clear forms of the sixteenth century. In comparing the map on p. 397 with that on pp. 316, 317, the most striking changes noted are the respective enlargement of the French and Spanish territories, and the obliteration of their feudal divisions ; this at once tells the story of the royal strength within their boundaries, and their appearance as fully formed national count7"y -states^ as opposed to the tribal city- states of antiquity. Here, again, the teacher should enforce the point, that landed possession lay at the foundation of all political and military power under the feudal system. Thus Charles the Fifth became the strongest monarch of his age, 1 It must not be forgotten that Italy was, par excellence, the land o/ the church and the popes. KEFOEMATION AND RENAISSANCE ERA. 121 through his inheritance of family titles to European lands ; al- though America was also included in his empire, still its unmanage- able distance, and the fact that it was neither cultivated nor settled, and so unable to yield either taxes or troops, made it of little value as a basis of political power, although from the first it was a rich source of the raw materials of commerce.^ From this desire for land, Italy was the greatest sufferer ; divided among many pett}' powers, incapable of union, and yet too strong to be subdued, under the nominal rule of an emperor who had more than he could rightly manage on the northern side of the Alps, — Italy was, as Dante named her, an " inn of grief " ; indeed, the events of the sixteenth century- (c) show that her possession was one of the great ambitions common to the European powers or, to speak more justly, to the European monarchs, for within this age, the monarchs were indeed the powers of Europe, with their standing armies and consolidated territories. Proof of this is seen in the arbitrary rule of Philip the Second of Spain, of Francis the First in France, of Henry the Eighth of England. Nothing more thoroughly displayed their strength than their ability to deal absolutely' with the strongest interest of the age, religious faith, and to impose at will the Catholic or Protestant creed upon their subjects ; ^ the same fact shows how thoroughly the monarchies embodied the spirit of centralization, of national unity, and it may perhaps be argued that the high-handed intolerance with which Jews and Moors were driven from Spain, Huguenots massacred in France, Dis- senters suppressed in England, was a historic necessity in the formation of self-sustaining national units, ^ considering how 1 To France and England, America soon added to this advantage that of serving as an asylum for rehgious refugees. 2 In France, their difficulty was enhanced by the fact that the religious parties revived the historic antagonism of king and noble. 3 One must not say too much, however, on this point, unless he wishes logically to find himself on the side of Bismarck, in his attempt to drive the Poles from Prussian Poland. In illustration, however, of the royal side of the question, see Queen Elizabeth's letter, p. 482. 122 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. high the feeling ran between men of opposing creeds. Thus the censorship of tlie press was felt almost from the beginning to be a necessity both by the pope, and by the various absolute monarchs, since their centralized powers depended too thoroughly on men's universal approval to render wide-spread intellectual dissent and free discussion safe. To the centralization of wealth and power in the hands of their kings, the countries of Western Europe owed, however, much of their material and commercial progress. In England, France, and Spain, the court was the centre of impulse for discovery, colonization, art, and literature. If the teacher have the time, he will find that a very valuable sub-study may be made in this connection of Queen Elizabeth, whose reign displayed absolutism, perhaps, at its best, although its more objectionable features were not so much absent as overshadowed.^ In the reign of James the First, on the contrary, these were the more decided features ; the expenses of the court devoured the earnings of the land which in justice should have been spent for the good of its people (see member for Oxford's speech, p. 433) ; taxes had been imposed without consent of Parliament ; worst of all, the king attempted to suppress the free speech of its members. It was the old feudal contest with the old feudal weapons all over again ; the king was poor, and must have money from his estates, who, on their part, would grant nothing without con- cessions of justice from the king. In the debate accompanying the Petition of Right, pp. 433, 434, it is plainly evident that men's minds yet clung to the feudal theory of a king's support, and felt that he should meet his own expenses from his own domain, the modern system of paying him a regular annual sum from a civil service list, whose charges are met by popular taxes, not yet having been invented. ^ At least he should stop to note, that as a strong and noble nationaltj calls forth the ardent patriotism of its citizens, so a strong, wise, truly "paternal" monarch calls forth the warm loyalty of his subjects (see i&ndj, p. 430). KEFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE ERA. 123 These causes of the EngUsh civil wars, however, would seem to have been subordinate to those arising from religious dis- sent ; judging from Hobbes' "Leviathan," and the "Solemn League," this was the cause which drove men on to war. The Scots' "Solemn League and Covenant" is one of the most significant documents of the age ; it breathes a solemn biblical intensity of faith ; it holds by an absolute union of church and state, in which the state shall be composed of the church, with the king for its executive servant ; ^ it is of neces- sity intolerant of Catholics and members of the established church. In all these ways it reflects the spirit and thought of the time, from the Puritan point of view, as Hobbes' " Levia- than " reflects it from the Royalist standpoint. It is generally felt that the Reformation is a rather delicate subject to deal with, so closely does it touch our own living interests. It is true that the movement is too often solely regarded from the Protestant standpoint, and explained exclu- sively as a great theological revolution. But a comparison of the decrees of the Council of Trent and of the Augsburg Con- fession will show that the theological differences were minor, while the practical questions of the marriage of priests and the relation of church and state were revolutionary ; the Protestant position of a "free church in a free state" was indeed so opposed to the whole European system from the earliest times, that not even the Protestants themselves knew how in that age to achieve it. Moreover, a due remembrance of the tendencies and facts of later mediaeval history will show that the Reforma- tion was the inevitable culmination of the secularization of the church, of national revolt against centralization, of intellectual revolt against authority. Luther came in the ".fulness of time," the successor of Wiclif and Huss, and with a body of long-gathering popular favor to sustain him. The facts that 1 Compare Cowell's " Interpreter," where the king is regarded as the source of law and above the law ; in the Puritan and Scotch view, the king is but the executive of fixed law. 124 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. the strongest spirits of the age were his upholders or fore- runners, that half the people of Europe were his admirers or followers, and that for more than a century the questions voiced so boldl}' by Luther shook Europe with war, prove clearly that he was a representative man, a man who spoke for half the world, a necessary man, demanded by the stress of contemporary thought and feeling. If time and cir- cumstance favor, the teacher can make a most admirable char- acter study on Luther, whose power largely consisted in his honesty, directness, independence, and passionate love of truth. Even in the extracts given, pp. 423, 424, it is plainly to be seen that he was eminently a conservative, and that his respect for the authority of the church was only exceeded by loyalty to the best truth he could discern. That the church was in need of reformation was clearly proved by the calling of the Council of Trent, and the earnest, wide-spread Jesuit movement ; within her precincts occurred a true reform, whose effects have lasted to the present time ; while the so-called Reformation was more of the nature of a re- volt, ending in the secession of the Teutonic races from that Latin church which had claimed to be the head and heart of Christen- dom. So thoroughly, however, had the church made itself one with all the secular interests of Europe, that this secession could only be accomplished either through great political dis- turbance, or by an appeal to arms ; and even then, as seen in the peace of Augsburg, it was still thought necessary for each prince to settle the religion of his own subjects ; unjust as this seems to modern ideas, we must always remember that differences in religion then meant civil war. In fact, of the two leading interests of the age, religion and trade, religion was the stronger, as proved by the facts, that, in opj^osition to all commercial considerations, such useful industrial popula- tions as the Huguenots in France, or the Moors in Spain, were expelled or massacred ; while the ruling motive of the most important wars was decidedly religious difference. That this motive affected peoples as thoroughly as kings is proved by REFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE ERA. 125 the fact that it was the motive of popular revolt and civil war as well as of international contest.^ One of the most interesting and picturesque illustrations of this prevailing spirit of the ase is to be seen in all the events connected with the Great Armada. Its first object purported to be the recovery of England from heresy ; its second, to cripple forever a foe already felt to be dangerous to Spanish commerce and coloniza- tion. On the side of the English and Dutch, meanwhile, the strongest defence against this mighty fleet was believed to be national prayer, and its misfortune and defeat were felt to be surely due to divine interposition. These wars of the Reformation essentially ended with the Thirty Years' War, one of the most important conflicts of modern times, not only on account of its magnitude and length, but because it made important changes on the European map ; while, during its progress, religious differences wearied them- selves out, or were settled with sufficient tolerance to render Europe quiet. It is significant to note in this connection, that France under the lead of Cardinal Richelieu already subordi- nated religious to political interests, since she entered the war on the side of the Protestants, in order still further to weaken her neighbor, the emperor, and disunite the Empire. At the opening of the sixteenth century the kings of the West had pretty well escaped from the tyranny of the feudal nobles ; not so the peasants. Their complaints in Alsace- Lorraine, and the account of their state given in More's Utopia, show that they had been deprived of their ancient use of the land, and of their old common rights to forest and waste, which they had inherited from their Teutonic ancestors. In England, the practice of the landlords of turning their lands into sheep-farms greatly injured the poorer agricultural class, 1 In the Peasants' War, the program of the peasants clearly shows how thoroughly social and political change seemed to them the natural accom- paniment of religious reform, since, in all their experience, these elements were inextricably involved in the consolidated structure under which they had always lived. 126 STUDIES IN GENEEAL HISTORY. ''for," as More says, ''one shepherd ... is enough to eat up that ground with cattle, to the occupying whereof about hus- bandry many hands were requisite." These "hands" being driven from their accustomed labor, unconsciously revenged themselves upon the state by becoming paupers, vagabonds, and thieves, thus changing from a valuable to a mischievous popu- lation ; nor did the sheep-pastures help to ameliorate this state of things by cheapening any necessity of life, since the land- lords were so wealthy and few that they easily monopolized the trade in wool, holding the prices where they would. The discoveries of the period were as pureh' commercial in their character as any of its undertakings. Yet the letter of Columbus^ (p. 421) shows how thoroughly zeal for the spread of the Catholic faith was mingled with the more secular objects of conquest and trade. From the very first, moreover, as is seen from the letter of Raleigh, national jealousies began to arise over these new-world possessions, England fearing lest Spain should become " unresistible " through these wealthy lands. The special original art of the Renaissance was painting, an art which reflected the three strong intellectual tendencies of the age. It borrowed its subjects from religion ; it sought its principles from Greek antiquity ; it drew its immediate inspira- tion from the direct study of nature ; these facts are illustrated by nearly every work of Raphael and Michael Angelo. In architecture, also, the antique forms appeared in the new combi- nations. In the court of the Borghese palace are mingled the Roman arch, the Greek pillar, and the medineval statue, while in St. Peter's, a similar combination is overtopped by the Oriental dome. While it is to be noted in this connection, that * If the teacher have the time and material at hand, he can make a most interesting study of Columbus, whose Hfe and character embodied much of the circumstances and spirit of the age. Even in tlie extract given, we see the loyalty, zeal, and modesty of this wonderful man, who has become too much of a name " to conjure by," instead of being present to our minds as a genuine and noble reality. KEFORMATION AND RENAISSANCE ERA. 127 the fine arts of the Renaissance owed their development to the patronage of courts and wealthy Italian merchants, still it must be remembered that opportunity and not inspiration was thus supplied. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — The map of Europe, the political pictm-e of the age. General view of the miity of the church from 325 to 1648. The political view of the Reformation. The three emperors, Augustus, Charlemagne, and Charles the Fifth. Famous monks. Why did not Italy and Germany become feudal monarchies like France and Spain? " The ships of Tarshish." Was religious toleration, as we understand it, possible in the Reformation ? (Debate.) In what ways was the Renaissance the culmination of mediaeval civilization? The crimes of the sixteenth century. Extracts from the diary of a Protestant Dutchman, who emigrated to Manhattan Island. Same of an English Catholic emigrating to Maryland. The history embodied in the Escorial. Was patronage necessary to the development of the Renaissance art? How could literature become somewhat free from patronage in this age ? How did the discovery of America aifect religious energy. Bacon v. Aristotle. Effect of gun- powder on the occupation of the knight. What was the significance of the appearance of Don Quixote ? The palace u. the castle. How does the public lighting of a city indicate a great advance in civilization ? Luther and Socrates. Observations of an Italian travelling in Eng- land in the time of Elizabeth. 128 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. E. MODERN EUEOPE, 1648-1880. I. Aa. General Study on ** Old Regime ^' in Europe ; Age of Louis XI v., Frederick the Great, Anne and the Georges, Maria Theresa, Peter the Great, A word should be given in explanation of the phrase, " Old Regime " ; strictly speaking, the term should be applied to feudal as distinct from constitutional governments ; but I have used it as applying to the absolute monarchies and aristocratic societies developed from feudalism, whose power culminated or began to be broken during this period. The studies, pp. 446, 451, 458, may be summarized as follows : — GENERAL VIEW OF "OLD REGIME," 1G48-1789. Organizations of Period. Absolute governments in ranee [ developed from feudal royalty. Austria \ Sardinia > developed from feudal imperial " marches." ^ Prussia ) Russia. Military despotism in England, under constitutional forms, appearing as the commonwealth, — republican form. protectorate, — limited autocracy of Cromwell.^ ^ These imperial marches were geographically so placed as to be involved in all European affairs. Thus, Savoy was always a felt power in all wars involving Italy, Germany, France, and Spain ; Brandenburg lay between the Northern and Western groups of European states, while Austria was still the bulwark of Europe against the Turk. The strength of the Empire lay in its separate members, not in its body. ^ Although in form limited, the powers assumed by Cromwell differed little from those of the monarchs of the " Old Regime " ; the source of his power, however, was popular rather than hereditary, and Parliament alone could raise taxes or grant supplies — notable differences. MODERN EUROPE. 129 Constitutional monarchy in England, limited or checked by- fixed income of the king, parliamentary control of law. finance, army, ministerial responsibility and majority (party) influence. Republics in America, Switzerland. England (see military despotism). Holland. Temporary European leagues, for purposes of maintaining " Balance of Power." securing international justice, obtaining favorable commercial terms. Great Movements of Age. International and colonial wars, caused by ^ ill-defined boundaries. commercial inequalities. disputed successions to various thrones. desires of Lewis XIV. and Frederic the Great for more territory. Turkish invasion. limited harborage and coast-line of the Baltic. " Balance of Power " system, waged in the interests of kings and merchants. 1 These causes may be grouped under the two very general heads of " A desire to win, keep, or increase royal power of the feudal type," and "A desire for commercial advantage"; after gaining the points given in the summary, the teacher might set the question, " Reduce these causes to two general statements," as an exercise in generahzation. On compar- ing these causes of war with those of the preceding period, it will at once appear how decidedly men's minds had passed from religious to secular interests. Of course, so far as these wars grew out of desire for terri- tory, they naturally resulted from the feudal organization, which associ- ated dominion with land-ownership. 130 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. General View of "Old Regime." — Continued. resulting in development of groups ^ of European lands, — Western: Spain, France, England, Nether- lands ; Germany, Italy, and Austria, involved. Northern : Scandinavia, Denmark, northern states of Germany, Russia, Poland. South-eastern : Turkey ; Austria and Russia involved. colonial and commercial annoyance and disturb- ance, devastation of European lands, misery of common people through disturbance of occupation, ruin of land and home, military service, taxes. Revolt, or tendency to revolt, against " Old Regime " in England, America, France. Relative Strength of European States. France strongest in age of Lewis XIV., > , i Austria second in rank, > territorial gains ; European alliances against them. Brandenburg most rapidly growing state, proved by value and power in military affairs, comparison of territory at beginning and close of period. Italy weakest during whole period, proved by her constant ter- ritorial loss. Poland most rapidly losing power, proved by her comparative share in affairs at beginning and end of age. her first partition. 1 Note that the leaders of the Western group are the lands of the Rhine and the Atlantic seaboard. The Northern group lias tlie Baltic for its commercial centre, the Soutli-eastern group has the Black Sea, with Constantinople for its Gibraltar. Again, the Western group was bound together by its historic relations with Home. MODERN EUROPE. 131 England first commercial and naval power i > note treaties and Holland second commercial and naval power ) wars. Characteristics of Age. Absolutism of monarchs, displaying itself in disposal 2 of European lands ; note the " Chambers of Reunion." seizure of Strasburg. treaties of Utrecht and Rastadt. divisions of Italy, seizure of Silesia, partition of Poland, arbitrary ^ declarations of war on their own behalf. Decrease of religious intolerance, seen in changed causes of wars, spirit and material of literature. Growth of republican, democratic, revolutionary ideas in litera- ture. Growth of positive intellectual interests. Natural science, — chemistry, physics, astronomy. botany. y New. zoology. Political economy. Philosophy of history and politics (common to England and France). Mental and moral philosophy (common to all Europe). Development of literature as a political, social, religious, and moral power, seen in close relation of English literature, politics, and religion of seventeenth century. ^ The English possession of Gibraltar, giving her the command of the Mediterranean, was one of her most important commercial acquisitions. 2 These may be regarded as euphemisms for actions which, in private life, and on a petty scale, would be described as dishonest, mean, cruel, or unjust. 132 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. General View of "Old Regime." — Continued. new, popular classes of literature, — periodicals, novels. satirical attacks (note caricature also). influence of English politics on French thought. censorship of the press. Foundations for truth, sought in nature. reason. history. Growth of philanthropic spirit. General material and intellectual progress, favored by royal interest and patronage. enormous development of popular literature. invention of machinery {the steam-engine). invention of apparatus. Nothing more strongly marks the political progress of this age than the drawing together of the states of Europe into a single commonwealth of nations, conscious of mutual relations and interests. This consciousness expressed itself in constant attempts to preserve the "Balance of Power" by temporary alliances against any state which, for the time being, threatened to become too strong for her neighbors, or by such compro- mises as that by which Poland was first divided between the jealous powers about her. While a general system of European politics was thus develop- ing, England was leading the way to the modern system of govern- ment, that depends for its support on popular suffrage, and organizes itself in representative forms. Even the restored Stuarts belonged rather to the modern than the old regime ^ and from the fall of Charles the First, England could no longer be properly classed as a feudal state, although many feudal forms remained, notably the old assembly of the first estate in the House of Lords. From that time, the House of Commons became the sti'ongest political power in Eng- land, although at first it used that power so timidly, that MODERN EUROPE. 133 often the king still had his way ; but that Parliament was in reality the stronger is proved by the inability of either of the restored Stuarts to carry their measures quite against its will. But with the " Declaration of Rights," Parliament became visi- bly the chief political power, since it held in its own hands the constant control of the law, of the treasure, of the army. In this expressed change consisted the accompHshed "Revolution of 1688," a revolution which the Commons could easily main- tain by the absolute dependence of the executive upon them for financial support. Shortly after this revolution, two new features of the constitution became decidedly visible : one, the development of a responsible ministry in sympathy with the majority of the popular vote ; ^ the other, the development of rival parties in the country ; each part}' striving to educate public opinion according to its own standards and desires ; and each party driving or driven in turn to the various political reforms called for by actual circumstance or b}' popular theory. When one notes how all the tendencies, interests, and posi- tive growths of this time are those which are still in our own century, urging their way to culmination, he may perhaps feel justified in including the age in the modern period, in spite of the completed feudal forms it presents in leading states. But the states' system of Europe, the appearance of popular repre- sentation in government, of religious toleration,- of free speech and popular agitation in regard to the gravest affairs, — of machine work in industry, of the novel and the newspaper in literature, the development of natural science, the growth of philanthropy, — all these things unite the age with ours by close organic ties. 1 But it must be remembered that the " popular vote " of the whole of this period was ver}-^ limited, according to present standards, and that the House of Commons was essentially aristocratic in composition and feeling. 2 It must be noted that religious toleration was a tendency rather than a fact. The acts of the first freely elected parliament of the Restoration show how intolerant the majority of the English people still were ; while James was driven from the throne quite as much on account of his atti- tude toward papists, as on account of his arbitrary government. 134 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Subjects for Essay and Examination Work. — The political crimes of the eighteenth century. Was the Navigation Act a per- manent advantage to England? (Debate.) Why should the Baltic be a cause of war ? The mediaeval causes for the weakness of Italy during this age. Views of a peasant in the Palatinate on the policy of Lewis XIV. Views of a French peasant on the same subject. Relation of colonial affairs to international European wars. Review of the growth of Brandenburg into the kingdom of Prussia. ^ Imagin- ary dialogue between Russia, Prussia, and Austria on the partition of Poland. Value of Constantinople to Russia. I. Ab. Special Study of the ** Old Hegitne " in France {Eighteenth Century Type). The results of this study may be embodied in some such summar}' as the following : — "OLD REGIME" IN FRANCE (EIGHTEENTH CENTURY). Organization, Absolute Feudal Monarchy (compare later Roman Empire and Oriental despotisms). Supported by the favor of its privileged classes, — officers of army and state, ) the officials of the church, v opposed to reform, an hereditary nobility, } the revenue from feudal dues, arbitrary taxes. the sale of offices, privileges, and titl«s. borrowed money, a standing army. Producing, or marked, in administration, by confusion, injustice and inequality. * Similar subjects may be given in connection with the growths of Savoy and Austria. MODERN EUROPE. 135 strong centralization, corruption and favoritism, official neglect and idleness, attempts at reform, ^ aiming at equality of taxation, of opportunity, before the law. religious toleration, legal uniformity, freedom of trade, freedom of thought and speech, economy at court, failing, through selfish interests of privileged classes, arbitrary laws, taxes, etc. repression of free speech and a free press, neglect of local interests, — roads, schools, churches, etc. in finance, by extravagance, insufficient revenue to meet ex- penses ;2 .-. debt, dishonesty, in law, by venality (buying and selling of office, and of jus- tice itself), unequal punishments, based on class distinction, barbarous punishments, uncertain, tardy, and varied justice. 1 Compare these attempted reforms with modem ideas, and with the actual changes brought about in France by the Revolutionary period. 2 This is the prime difficulty which hampers the government, but gives to France her one effective means for forcing reform. (Compare England before the Civil Wars.) 136 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. " Old Rkgime " in France. — Continued. in the church, by close union of church and state ; intolerance, corruption, simony, inequality, based on class distinctions. in the army, by corruption. inequality and injustice (class distinctions), compulsory and oppressive enlistment, no chance for honorable promotion, in trade, by government interference, exclusive guild monopoly ; .*. careless work, high prices, in society, by hereditary status ; .*. unequal opportunity for official position, acquirement of wealth, acquirement of education, dependence of talent on royal or aristocratic favor. The Life of France. At court, marked by extravagance, in behalf of pleasure and pomp. immorality. neglect of state interests, love of pleasure, supported by bad debts to the bourgeoisie, oppressive feudal taxation, resulting in the formation of corrupt and mischievous ideals, — pleasure, idleness, splendor, careless and mischievous administration, financial embarrassment. MODERN EUROPE. 137 Among the bourgeoisie, marked by- honesty. domestic virtue. industry and intelligence. public interest, resulting in prosperity and comparative wealth. disapproval of the court. desire for government reform.^ comparative political importance. Among the peasants, marked by extreme poverty. extreme physical misery. extreme ignorance and superstition. oppressive taxation and overwork. no protection for property or labor. enforced monopolies (gahelle, etc.). resulting in inferior development of French resources, blind dissatisfaction and unintelligent revolt development of dangerous classes, physical degradation of peasant, desire for destruction of " Old Regime." Thought and Feeling. Of the supporters of royalty, — belief in divine origin and support of kings; ••• feeling that disloyalty is irreligious, belief in arbitrary right of the king to change or neglect the law. to claim and use the property of the realm.'^ ^ The bourgeoisie would try to reform rather than destroy the " Old Regime," since violent change is always opposed to the interests of trade ; while to the peasant, revolution could only mean change for the better. 2 These beliefs in regard to the king had their historic reason. The idea of his " divine right " arose partly from the Scriptural presentation of Hebrew royalty, and partly from the close relations of the heads of church and state during the Middle Ages ; his relation to the law as its ,1 138 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. "Old Regime " in France. — Continued. servility and dependence. fear of Voltaire, Rousseau, and their followers.^ sentimental sympathy for the poor.^ Of Voltaire, Rousseau, Helvetius, and their followers, — revolt against absolutism of king, admiration of English thought and government, demand for free thought and speech, demand for popular power to change laws, demand for equality before the law. demand for equal education (opportunity), belief in common right to the land, belief in happiness as standard of morality, ) belief in experience as only source of knowledge, i loss of any fixed standard of right-doing. A thorough understanding of the '' Old Regime" is essential to a clear understanding of the Revolution, which was by no means a single revolt against a single thing, but a complex turmoil arising from the clash of strong and wealth}' classes, of inexperienced thinkers, of ignorant and desperate masses, against an ancient, rigid sj'stem, which had spread root and branch through every institution, every industry, every habit of French life. It is therefore necessary to look fairly at this system, and understand just its relations to each great class of society, and again, to examine as far as we can into the status of each of these classes, in order that we may understand the elements as well as the causes of the inevitable Revolution. source and chief executive, gave rise to the feeling that he was above the law ; while the whole feudal system rested on the theory that all land- titles derived their first validity from royal grants. 1 No fact more thoroughly proves the influence of Voltaire and Rous- seau than this fear practically expressed through a severe censorship of their writings. ' That this sympathy was sentimental, was proved fast enough by the strenuous opposition made by the upper classes to the genuinely helpful reforms proposed by Turgot and Necker. ' MODERN EUROPE. 139 For the Revolution was inevitable ; the king could no longer force money from the third estate and the peasantry ; long- wars, and the fetters imposed on industry by the feudal regime, had exhausted or bound fast the resources of France ; and large masses of men, even 'the king himself, had come face to face with the primal question, "How to live?" Aside from this, men everywhere found themselves hampered and embarrassed, if not absolutely wronged, b}- an unavoidable subordination to an unwieldy mediaeval system. There is no more striking example in all history of the power of an organization to shape the life of men unfortunately than is furnished by this ' ' Old Regime " ; the nobles, shut out by law or custom from commer- cial and professional careers, became a mass of idle, pleasure- loving landlords, dependent on the king for their occupations and honors ; the peasants necessaril}^ starved and deteriorated under a system which held them fast to the land, and, at the same time, demanded a disproportionate share of taxes and of heavy physical toil ; the bourgeoisie, m6re healthfully situated, free merchants of the towns or cities, with an assured market, were the soundest men of France, — thoughtful, industrious, and somewhat fitted for citizenship. Among such materials, the ideas of Voltaire and Rousseau might well be feared by those who wished to uphold the ' ' Old Regime," since in their pages its ver}^ foundations were attacked ; according to them, the law, the land, the very constitution, were primarily for the good of the people, and should be under their control. That law and government should emanate from popu- lar sources is an idea now considered fundamental, but in the France of the eighteenth century it was revolutionary, although naturally called forth by the abuses of an absolute and arbitrary rule. Rousseau went further, and affirmed that the land should belong to all the people, a demand easy to comprehend when we remember that absolutism had abused its power here also, and had devoted large tracts of French terri- tory to the purposes of idle pleasure, while no hard-working peasant was secure in its use or possession. 140 STXJDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Thought was indeed the most dangerous enem}' of the '^ Old Regime " ; its financial support, and the mass of its standing army, were drawn from classes that would with reason desire thoroughly to change or destroy it, the instant that their eyes and minds were opened to its injustice, awkwardness, and weakness. The difficulties in their way were meanwhile great, — the powerful landed interests of the clergy and the nobles; their own ignorance or inexperience ; the dangers with which revolution always threatens property ; the practical hindrances to united action found in bad and uncertain roads, and in the natural inertia of men in regard to great and general affairs. That in spite of all, the Revolution came, proves that France had a vital need for "' Liberty^ Equality^ Fraternity'' ; — for free- dom of trade, of thought, of speech ; for equalit}' before the law ; for equal chances to learn and labor ; for a truly sympa- thetic fraternity between class and class. The whole of conti- nental Europe was full of misery, but France saw light ; for in England and America the day had dawned. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — Stupidities of the "Old Regime." Did they originate in stupidity? Defend your position . Why should the peasants of France become e/jra^rerf, rather than thoughtful, under the "Old Regime"? Account by a common French soldier of his experiences in the army. Reminis- cences of an " Invalide." What were the "prospects " open to young Frenchmen of each class during the eighteenth century ? Reflections of Necker on the usefulness of a French minister. Why should thoughtful Frenchmen admire England? Why should the ideal prevalent at court not spoil the "Bourgeoisie"? A i)easant's notion of reform. A noble's. A merchant's. FRENCH REVOLUTION AND WARS OF NAPOLEON. 141 E. II. PKENOH EEVOLUTION AND WAKS OF NAPOLEON, 1789-1815. Each of the studies, 1,2, and 3, should be summarized and finished before passing on to new work. The following tabula- tions may prove helpful : — 1. FRENCH REVOLUTION. Caused by : Arbitrary absolutism of " Old Regime ; " . • . Oath of Tennis-court. A standing army under absolute royal control; .•. formation of " National Guard." Feudal oppressions of nobles; .-. destruction of title-deeds. Instability of law and government ; . • . demand for a signed constitution as a received and understood standard of government.^ Exemption of nobles and clergy from taxation ; .-. resignation of feudal privilege by the nobles. confiscation of church property to state use. Degradation and ignorance of lowest classes; .*. cruel and unintelligent action in revolution. Suppression of free thought and religious intolerance; .-. reaction to worship of " Reason." Favored by : Weakness of " Old Regime," seen in inability to suppress revolution or preserve order, attempted flight of king, " emigration " of nobles, sudden completeness of its fall. 1 The demands of this first constitution show what wrongs the middle class — the third estate — had most keenly felt ; namely, taxation without representation, arbitrary and uncertain law, and the exhaustion of French blood and treasure in foreign wars, waged at tlie will of the king. 142 STUDIES IN GENEEAL HISTORY. French Revolution. — Continued. General French sympathy i with the Revolution, strengthened by attacks of foreign powers. vacillation and weakness of king. Marked by : (1) Rapid succession of constitutional changes. (2) Popular suspicions of league of European kings, .*. determination to execute Lewis XVI.^ popular energy in foreign wars. (3) Despotism under republican forms, Sept., 1792 to July, 1794, embodied in Parisian clubs and committees, demagogic autocrats (Robespierre), proving its nature by arbitrary imprisonment and massacre. " Reign of Terror." imposition of revolutionary worships, supported by terrorism, — imprisonment, assassination. condemnation without trial, mob violence. (4) Reaction against mob-rule, and gradual restoration of order, embodied in Directory. constitution of year VIII., Napoleonic rule, supported by national forces, led by Napoleon Bonaparte. (5) Foreign conqu^t, accompanied by (6) Proclamation of republican principles, and Enforcement of republican constitutions in conquered territory. 1 Had the body of the people been attached to the " Old Re'girae," of course it could not finally have been overthrown, since perhaps even the peasants would have made a good defence, judging from their energy in the Vendean War. 2 The whole government of the " Old Regime " had been so absolutely- centralized in the person of the monarch, that to the peasants and the populace, at least, the execution of the king would mean the fall of the whole system. PREKCH REVOLUTION AND WARS OF NAPOLEON. 143 Results of Revolution. Military autocracy of Napoleon.^ Uniform system of published law (Code Napoleon). A published constitution, open to popular criticism. Established recognition of the representative principle. Destruction of feudalism ; .-. equality before the law. uniform system of taxation substituted for feudal dues. Formation of a national army. Development of French patriotism, through common sufferings and achievements. foreign attack, and Napoleon's victories. Although the " Old Regime " apparently fell at a blow before the first attack of vigorous revolution, we must still remember with Taine, that its spiritual forces, its habits of thought and action, were powerful factors throughout the Revolutionary age ; perhaps indeed the}" still possess a governing force in France. America was too recent and distant an experiment to have any practical lessons to teach, while English kings still managed by various forms of bribery and trickery to govern more in sympathy with the old than with the coming political system of Europe. France herself only knew by experience one way of government, the way of centralized despotism, and throughout her attempts at political liberty, this political habit clung. The most ardent defenders of the *' Rights of Man," when they obtained the power and responsibilit}' of government, could not see their way clear to solve the problem of securing order at home and victory abroad, without recourse to force, and the representative machine was far too imperfect and ill-adjusted to work out desirable results, especially in a period so full of rapid and critical dangers. Taine has clearly shown that the despotisms of the "Old Regime" were to blame for the despotisms of the Revolution ; but perhaps he does not suffl- 1 The comparison between Cromwell and Napoleon is a natural and strik- ing one; but it applies rather to their circumstances than their characters, 144 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. ciently emphasize the '•''dire necessity^'' which day after day forced on bold but inexperienced men to some sort of great and decisive action, involving the movements of troops, the wholesale judgments of courts, the suppression of disturbance, the defence of legislative bodies, the conclusion of treaties. Even a modern state, with a smoothly working representative system, with railway and telegraph and newspaper at com- mand, in such a time of foreign and domestic stress, would find itself urged to some form of easily and rapidly acting autocracy. It is beyond all doubt that France could not change in less than a generation, if, indeed, so quickly, from the " Old Regime " to a genuine republic of any sort. How badly even the most advanced republicans understood the spirit the}' had evoked was shown by the enforcement of republican forms and names upon countries prepared neither to understand nor be grateful for them. Under these conditions, it was fortunate for France that the Directory, driven for self-preservation to the protec- tion of Napoleon, found in him a master for itself and France ; a master of sufficient genius to hold France firm to the acknowl- edged principles of the Revolution ; a master who knew how to give France law and order and peace under the new forms which she herself could not yet use ; and a master representative in his own person of popular government. The constitution of the year VIII. diifered vastly from the " Old Regime," in that it recognized the people as a part of the government of France, and brought the whole country under a uniform standard of law. Although in France, as in England, revolution did not at once change the reality of various politi- cal relations, yet it gave men new forms and new tools, better fitted to the spirit and tendency of the age. Little bv little the new forms were to become inspired with the breath of i)opular life, and little by little the new tools were to gain edge and temper and strength, as the awkward grasp of the people became surer and finer. The Revolution is even more striking from the social than the political standpoint ; and its political results may almost be FRENCH REVOLUTION AND WARS OF NAPOLEON. 145 regarded as a necessary outcome of its social changes. Its essential fact was, that it overthrew feudalism, or a society based on hereditary status, and gave to France instead a nation of citizens and a society based upon equal relationship to a common soil. 2. THE NAPOLEONIC RULE. Developed by : Necessities of France for domestic peace, foreign victory. Military genius of Napoleon. Supported by : Patriotism of France, and Loyalty of armies to Napoleon. Napoleonic recognition of republican principles and forms.i Resulting in : Recovery of Rhine frontier for France, (Compare with boun- dary of ancient Gaul.) Growth of Napoleonic Empire. (Compare with Empire of Charlemagne.) Fall of " Holy Roman Empire." ^ European opposition to Napoleon ^ and revolutionary principles, caused by fear of his military genius. 1 Note Napoleon's recognition of the principle of manhood suffrage in his own elevation; but in his arbitrary disposal of the various parts of his empire, he followed the spirit and example of the " Old Regime." 2 In order to call attention to this rather uninfluential event, the teacher should remind the class that it was the title of Augustus Caesar, which came to its end in 1806 ; and that from this Holy Roman Empire have been formed Italy, Germany, Austria, Poland, Holland^ Belgium, and Switzerland. ^ It is interesting to note how neighborly jealousies sometimes over- came the common fear of Napoleon, as when Austria and Prussia joined him against Russia. In the early part of the Revolution, also, France was often indebted to various European jealousies or rival ambitions. 146 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. The Napoleonic Rule. — Continued. spread of the republican principles which he claimed to person if y.^ fall of Napoleon. national reactions against foreign influence or rule, in Spain. Russia. Prussia, resulting in readjustment of Europe at Congress of Vienna. The Congress of Vienna proved itself the representative of the '' Old Regime," not only by its restorations of old dynasties, but by its arbitrary disposal of pAiropean lands and peoples. 3. PRUSSIAN REVOLUTION. Developed by : \ Necessity of Prussia for forces ^ funds > to cope with Napoleon. patriotism ) Failure of " Old Regime " to meet this necessity, because of inequality and inadequacy of taxation. entire separation of people and government. fixed nature of occupations;^ .*. loss of free energy. fixed tenure and status of land; .-. inadequate development of Prussian resources. popular sympathy with French Revolution. Genius of Stein and his associates. 1 The formation of the "Holy Alliance" proves how thoroughly the monarchs of Europe realized that Napoleon was not their iinal foe, but rather the ideas which he liad nominally represented. 2 For the historic origin of the three classes of Prussia, with their corre- sponding occupations, see " Studies," p. 226. FRENCH REVOLUTION AND WARS OF NAPOLEON. 147 Resulting in Formation of a national army, Abolition of serfdom, Free trade in land, y Reforms of Stein, Scharn- horst, and their associ- -^ , . ™ ^- ^ i> I ^-t^s. Compare with Free choice oi occupation to rrus- rp , . sian citizens, j Nationalization of Prussia; .-. Growth of patriotism, developed by- reform of the state, example of Spain. i agitation of secret societies, active efforts of enthusiastic patriots, — Arndt, poet. Jahn, gymnast.2 Fichte, philosopher, statesmanship of Stein. War of Liberation. Recognition of constitutional jirinciples.^ The French and the Prussian Revolutions were caused by similar needs, and effected similar ends ; both were forced on by the demand of the government for money, which an exhausted land could by no means yield, and for popular sympathies, which an oppressed peasantry and a neglected middle class could by no means give ; and both ended in most radical change, — in the destruction of the rigid feudal state, with its classes, lands, and occupations, fixed by distinctions of birth, and in 1 From the extract given on p. 488, it will be seen that the national movement in Spain was greatly intensified by a spirit of religious zeal against the " heretic." 2 Although there is a touch of romance about the attractive figure of Jahn, his idea was nevertheless far more practical than one at first might think ; the splendidly trained peoples of antiquity show what the physi- cal culture of the individual may accomplish for the race ; while in the Prussian army we have the modern application of the same principle. ^ These, however, did not begin to work so quickly in Germany as in France ; but the seed was planted ; and its life was in it, " after its kind," from tjie day that Stein called together again the old mediaeval estates, which were in their spirit and origin popular assemblies. 148 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. the erection instead of the mobile modern state, with its free citizens, lands, and trades. But while the French Revolution was precipitated upon an unprepared, inert, and helpless gov- ernment which must needs fall before its onset, the Prussian Revolution was the result of strong and simple statesmanship, whose measures were carried out by government itself, and carried out so peacefully that men were scared}- aware that Prussia as well as France and England had entered the world of modern states. The revolution was the less marked because the fundamental change was social, as in France ; and here it was unaccompanied by any agitation for those political changes with which France had terrified Europe. For the time being, Prussia felt no need of such political change. The Prussian monarchs had attended to the duties of their office and the interests of their people far better than the kings of France ; the changes of Stein and his associates met the need of the hour ; the freeing of serfs and the reform of the army gave Prussia at once a free citizen army, enlivened throughout by the breath of hopeful emulation ; free trade in land rendered every acre available to capital ; and free choice of occupation allowed every man to serve the state according to his best or favorite capacit}' ; thus the Prussian resources began to gather force and volume from farm and shop and counter ; and the free citizens became better and better able to bear the burdens of taxation. Meanwhile, all these reforms made Prussia a country to be loved, so that the revolution at home, and admiration for Stein, began to neutralize the effects of the Revolution in France and admiration for Napoleon. From the day that Stein noticed the power of the Spanish revolt, he regarded the passion of patriotism, the sentiment of nationality, as the mightiest foe that could be evoked against Napoleon ; hence his eagerness to spread the news of it, and to rouse the national pride to enthusiasm by poetry and stirring ex- ample. That Napoleon entirely agreed with Stein's opinion, is easily inferred from his demand for Stein's dismissal ; that Stein was wholly right was proved by the event. Even in Yorck, the FRENCH REVOLUTION AND WARS OF NAPOLEON. 149 brave old general, the love of his land overcame his life-long habit of military obedience. I cannot forbear adding that the development of Prussian nationality is a most significant lesson as to the wide popular effects which the conscious purpose and action of a few united and devoted patriots may achieve. Suggestions for Essay and Examination Work. — Does the Revolution show the French people to have been eager or slow in regard to political change? Why is a "national guard" the most effective national defence, other things being equal ? How did it hap- pen that France, during the Revolutionary period, was so well able to meet foreign invasion? How was the "Old Regime" to blame for the excesses of the Revolution ? The inconsistencies of Robespierre. Journal of an " Emigrant." Letters of a Norman noble, present in the national assembly from its opening to Aug. 5, 1789. Letters of a Lyons merchant present during the same period. IMob-rule v. the " Old Regime." Reflections of a Roman citizen on the French procla- mation of a Roman republic. Same of a Venetian aristocrat on the proclamation of a Venetian republic. What are the uses of a writ- ,ten constitution? The working of the " Balance of Power" system during the Napo- leonic era. Napoleon and Charlemagne. What popular ideals and desires did Napoleon personify or accomplish? What old historic idea appears in the phrase "Holy Alliance"? How far have the arrangements of the Congress of Vienna remained permanent? What does the history of the Prussian Revolution show as to the value of personal effort for a great political object? What would have been the opinion of practical, common-sense men as to the advisability of Prussia's making any attempt to resist Napoleon after the Treaty of Tilsit? How did the reforms of Stein increase happi- ness? Energy? Napoleon v. Stein. Value of secret societies as instruments of agitation. (Debate.) 150 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. E. III. THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. On page 491, a blank space is left after ''chief contemix)- rary and original sources," in order that the teacher may have an opportunity to test the pupil's power to recognize the true sources of historical knowledge when he sees them. If he has noted these sources as they have been indicated throughout the work, he will now be ready to see that the contemporary world is full of the original "raw material" of nineteenth century history ; that it is appearing in newspapers, in new laws, in contemporarj' literature and art, in declarations of war and treaties of peace, in statistics, in investigations and inventions, in amusements and manners ; and, above all, in the organizations into which men are crowding the forces of numbers and knowl- edge, or from which they are silently withdrawing these forces. If the class be sufficiently mature, there is no better place than this to enter upon some discussion of the comparative value of historic materials, and to note the tests by which this or that should be rejected as useless. But even with the most mature pupils that are likely to use this book, it may not be well to enter further into the matter than to note, that in all the mass of actions, facts, opinions, and objects, which enter into the lives of men, some enter so widely into the lives of the generality so as to become positive forms or forces in society, and so rise to be of general typical historic value ; and while the student should respect every action, fact, opinion, and object as significant, he should be led to feel a sense of proportion in regard to their relative value. The " Studies" on 1 and 2 may be summarized somewhat as follows : — THE N^INETEENTH CENTURY. 151 NINETEENTH CENTURY. Political Organizations. ^monarchical (England). Constitutional governments, ■< republican (America, France). (imperial (Germany), composed of an executive head, — non-representative and irresponsible (Ex. : English monarch). representative and responsible (Exs. : prime minister, president) . legislative chambers, — upper house : hereditary, elected, or appointed. lower house : elected, more popular than upper. courts of justice. a democratic body of citizens, bound together by common interests in government. law. defence and commerce. education. religion. common residence on national soil. based upon popular approval. characterized by majority rule. universal suffrage, or strong tendency toward it. systems of checks. legal and political equality of citizens. publicity of measures. representative system, applied to magistrates (Ex.: English premier). assemblies (Ex.: Reichstag). citizen-armies. aided or rendered possible by railroads, telegraphs, steamships, etc. newspapers, public education. public spirit and interest of citizens. 152 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Nineteenth Century. — Continued. The nation-state, bound together by ties of common race and speech, common religion, common government and interests. Exs. : Italy, Germany, France, Russia. Imperial, colonial union (England), composed of Europeans, and undeveloped or native races, developed through commercial interests, modern means of communication. European congresses, conferences, etc., tending to unify Europe. substitute arbitration for war. protect weak states, preserve the " Balance of Power." Political parties, embodying public opinion in working organizations of citizens. Secret societies, agitating for national independence (Germany, Italy, Greece). changes in government, — » constitutional (Germany, Italy), communistic or socialistic (France, Ger- many), anarchic (Russia). Other Organizations. The free church in the free state (America). Combinations of labor, — trades-unions. secret societies. international unions. co-operative unions (Ex. : building associations). political parties (German socialists). Public schools. Citizen-armies. THE NINETEENTH CENTUEY. 153 Voluntary societies for management of charities, agitation of reforms, 'pursuit of learning, etc., etc. Great corporations for carrying on business enterprises (bank- ing, manufacturing, transportation, telegraphy, etc., etc.). G-reat Movements and Tendencies of Age. r Asia (England, Russia). Europeanization of other J Africa (England, France), continents, ( Australia (England), in interests of commerce. Christianity. Development of nationalities, completed in Germany, Italy, Greece, Holland, Belgium, agitated for in Hungary, Poland, Ireland, proceeding in America. Formation of popular constitutional governments in France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Spain, etc. European wars,i in behalf of nationality. "Balance of Power." colonial interests, resulting in formation of national units, constant checking of greater powers.'^ arbitrary disposal of weaker peoples (in some cases). ^ Perhaps no one war outranks in importance the Franco-Prussian, which at one blow made France a republic, completed the independence and freedom of Italy, and bound the states of Germany into imperial union. 2 Notably Russia ; on whom Europe has long kept constant watch. 154 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. Nineteenth Century. — Continued. Abolition of slavery and serfdom (England,* Russia, Prussia, America). Socialism, embodied in political parties, secret societies, aiming at^ state ownership of means of labor, more equitable distribution of profits of labor, greater leisure and culture for laboring classes, reorganization of states in the interests of labor. Characteristics of Age. Democracy. Individual freedom of occupation, labor, movement, residence. speech and thought. Appearance of lowest classes as members of society (through abolition of slavery and serfdom), members of the state (through universal suffrage, citi- zen-armies, and public schools). Industrial development, favored by new means of transportation and communication (railway, telegraph, steamship), introduction of machinery, opening of Oriental markets, development of new lands. Scientific investigation. General diffusion of intelligence, comfort, and freedom. 1 In England the slave-owners were paid for their property by the state ; in America, through the pressure of circumstance, this property was re- garded as " contraband of war." 2 I have purposely stated these aims in tlie most general terms, since the name of socialist covers so many theories and desires. A more defi- nite list miglit be made for class-work by paraphrasing the demands made on pp. 637, 638. THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. 155 Strained relations of church and state. Religious toleration, seen in Christian and JVIohammedan equality in Turkey. repeal of corporation and test acts in England. Catholic relief act in England. disestablishment of Irish ' ' church." Cosmopolitanism, or diffusion of common thought and knowledge of agricultural, commercial, and mechanical resources. Increasing number and power of social organizations. The British constitution is a government machine worked by the people. The powers of the monarch are so hedged about by those of the premier and the commons, the premier is so de- pendent on the following of the commons, the latter are so readily displaced by the popular vote, and this again is so easily led by argument or personal influence, that no part of the government can long act in a way which people in general regard as foolish or wicked without experiencing a change of heart or a fall. Although in its essential spirit democratic, yet the British con- stitution is more picturesque than the plainer and severer forms of France and America, since its legislative assemblies find their title and origin in the mediaeval assemblies of estates, while the monarch and the court preserve the memories of the "Old Regime." Of these historic forms, the House of Lords and the king appear unnecessary to an American eye, since the real work of government is carried on by the more distinctly modern and representative parts of the constitution, the prime minister and the House of Commons. Although the House of Commons is a representative body in theory, and largely so in fact, it can never be the thorough tool of the democracy until its members are paid for their services, thus allowing the trading and laboring classes to send personal representatives. This imperfection, however, is partly counterbalanced by the superior independence of men, whose living does not depend on their expressed political opinions. The central figure of the government is, of course, the prime minister ; he embodies popular will and trust ; he is the responsible executive of the 156 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. nation ; and so thoroughly is his power felt to be the leading one, that in common speech the prime minister and his fol- lowers are called ''the government." Nothing more strikingly illustrates the great change that has passed over France within the century than to compare her present constitution with that of the "Old Regime" ; heredi- tary distinctions in society have vanished ; the whole people share in the government ; the church has ceased to be a dis- tincti\e part of the state. France indeed has. become a more thoroughly modern state than her leader, England, since every part of her government is directly representative of the will of the majorit}^ of her citizens, and since her citizens include all eligible Frenchmen at home, or in the colonies. By this last inclusion, France has succeeded in binding her colonies to her- self in organic union, and thus in forming a genuine " Greater France." Germany differs from England and France in that it is a complex of historic states, where the problem of representation has been more difficult, because not only citizens but govern- ments must be represented. These governments, too, differ widely in spirit, form, history, and power ; while one of them, the Prussian, maintains among the others a leadership almost amounting to autocracy. But the elastic fitness of the English constitution to modern political needs receives no better illus- tration than the fact that it has been made the successful work- ing basis for the governments of two states so widely different as German)' and France, — the former the home of particu- larism, the latter thoroughly stamped with centralization. Not only the principles but the forms of these modern con- stitutions run parallel. To the king corresponds the emperor and the president ; the latter, however, adds to his power the responsibility of a prime minister. This responsibility and a limited term of office give him checks felt neither by king nor emperor. With the premier ranks the chancellor ; the House of Lords is copied by the French Senate and the German Bundesrath ; while the purely nineteenth century parts of the THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. 157 constitution, the lower houses and the citizen body, are very nearly alike. The modern state thus stands before us, the complete, ad- justable organ of popular will. It has secured itself against domestic tyranny b}^ a cunning system of constant and bal- anced checks ; against foreign invasion hy citizen-armies and a central responsible chief. It embodies within itself the representative principle discovered b}' the towns in the feudal age, and the equal citizenship of the classic republics ; but it has learned to combine the two, so that its popular assemblies are neither confined to the representation of a single city as in antiquity, nor to the representation of separate hereditary classes as in the mediaeval age. The newspaper and the tele- graph serve the purpose of the crowded " market-place," and enable a widely scattered population to learn, discuss, and judge at the same hour the events of each passing day, thus binding areas of thousands of miles into an intelligent, sympa- thetic, political unit. Thus for the state, space is destroyed ; and the practical difficulty felt by antiquity of forming a suc- cessful republic larger than the area of a single city, has disap- peared. Nevertheless, in the modern as in the ancient state, ' ' Persuasion " is the goddess who grants political power ; a power no man can keep unless he keep as well the approval of the majority of his fellow-citizens. Our armies, again, are of a new type. The mercenaries who played so important a part in antiquity, the mediaeval warrior-bands of vassals, following their knightly landlords, are alike displaced by citizen-armies, regularly trained and paid to serve their whole country and their own country. In noting the other features of organized social life in our own century, we are struck b}' the endless number of organiza- tions, and by the fact that they are almost without excep- tion formed in the interests of genuine progress, and that a progress toward the higher, freer, more spiritual life of man. Many of them are absolutely new ; others bear some resem- blance to older forms ; thus, the trades-union recalls the guild, 168 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. the colonial empire of England has points of resemblance with the empire of Rome. But the resemblances are superficial ; the time is great and original, and gives its own peculiar stamp to all its living forms. The constitutional state is distinctly of the nineteenth cen- tury ; the nation-states appeared with the opening of the Renaissance, but our own century has notably increased their number, strengthened the spirit of nationality and the con- sciousness of race-relationships. Thus in the modern as the ancient state appears the strong kinship bond with a common fatherland or mother-country as a common ancestor. The strong tendency toward the formation of these national units is seen in the almost constant agitation, which desires for nation- alization have produced in one or another part of Europe. This desire has divided the Holy Roman Empire since its final fall into its true component parts, — a Protestant, Dutch- speaking Holland ; a Catholic, French-speaking Belgium ; a Catholic Italy ; a union of the old German-born and German- speaking tribes into a Teutonic empire ; with this desire, Hungary has disturbed Austria ; Ireland besieged England ; Poland roused the sympathies and sometimes the indignation of civilized states ; pleading the rights of nationality, Greece commanded the services of Europe to obtain them ; by national sympathies or aspirations, Turkey has lost wholly, or in part, one after another of her little Slavic and Clnistian principali- ties, until, dismembered and disjointed, the Moslem Oriental state has won the nickname of the " Sick Man" of Europe. How far nationality can really settle the independence and the boundaries of European states is still an open question. When political boundaries follow strongly marked geographical bar- riers, such as Italy, Spain, and England possess, we will hardly expect political disturbance arising from this source ; but the partition of Poland shows how helpless a country is without such natural defences, while the able and increasingly success- THE NINETEENTH CENTURY, 159 ful agitations, for " Home-Rule " in Hungary and Ireland, have been strongly backed by their real geographical unity. German}', however, lies between two badly defined boundaries ; and the shifting fortunes of her Russian and French frontiers have proved already, and may perhaps in future prove, a source of serious difficulty with a greedy or discontented neighbor. AYhile Europe thus individualizes within, a glance at the map (pp. 520, 521) will show how rapidly she is penetrating or pos- sessing the rest of the world. Since the opening of the sixteenth centur}', the great movement of population has been from Europe outward; her peoples have "swarmed" westward, eastward, southward ; with them they have carried their material civiliza- tion, their ideas, their institutions; already the world itself grows cosmopolitan ; and each land gives of its own good in return for that of every other. As the Greek peopled the ^gsean coasts and islands, as the Macedonian hellenized West- ern Asia, as the Roman peopled and civilized the lands of the Mediterranean basin, so the European will possess the world. With each of these movements, civilization has swept through wider circles of land and population ; on comparing its present area with that which it held a thousand years B.C., we note a marvellous change ; then, in a little knot of Oriental states, a rich, material civilization concentrated its enjoyments and powers in the lives of nobles, kings, priests, and merchants; now three great continents are thoroughly possessed by free peoples, among whom a high type of material and intellectual civilization is widely spread, and still more widely spreading ; and the same leaven has begun to work through the continents that remain. But the movement is not all peaceful ; the urgent Europeans threaten to crowd each other hard in the most desirable parts of the outlying world ; in fact, the international relations of Europe are largely determined by colonial and commercial considerations ; thus Russia and England threaten in Asia, and clashing colonial interests may mean European war ; thus the determination that Russia shall not win Constantinople, 160 ST.UDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. prolongs the existence of Turke}', aud decides the combinations of P2urope in every Eastern complication. Turning from the general history of Europe to the history of special countries, we find in nearly every case that this is so entangled with international or cosmopolitan movements that it only gives particular illustrations of general historic tendencies. Thus in England, as everywhere, the advance of democracy, colonial and commercial interests, and the problems of labor, have been the centres of action. There, as elsewhere, democracy has grown more and more complete with the ad- vancing century ; one has but to compare the demands of the Chartists with the reforms made by Parliament from 1848 onward, to see how rapidly this political tendency has changed from the dread to the pet of the public ; those demands, so shocking to the English feeling of the former time, are now almost wholly answered. There, as elsewhere, but more than elsewhere, commerce has led men forth to civilize and conquer. So important are her colonies and her commercial routes, that the foreign relations of England may almost be explained by reference to these alone. Thus the fear of Russia determines her attitude in all affairs where Constantinople is threatened or involved, while the Suez Canal, her all-important highway to India, constantly entangles her in Egyptian affairs. In her colonial and commercial relations, England has proven herself at times the benefactor, at times the oppressor, of inferior races. But it may perhaps be said that such acts of injus- tice as the Opium War, and the imposition of her own ruler in Afghanistan, have been overbalanced by the higher civiliza- tion she has introduced, by the roads she has opened, by the missionaries and schools she has protected, and by such meas- ures as the abolition of widow-burning and the suppression of the Thugs in India. In England, too, as elsewhere, the problems of labor have caused threatening movements and important legislation. First, the progress of mechanical invention substituted ma- chines for men in manufactures ; the first result of this was to THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. 161 throw out of work a mass of artisans, mostly skilled laborers, who had no other way of making a living than that the machine had taken. Then came the Corn-laws, which injured all classes by raising the price of bread, and only benefited for the time being the English wheat-growers, who, by holding a monopoly of a prime necessity, could say to the public, "Your money or your life." All along, too, one serious element^ in the Irish problem has been a labor-question in regard to the due rela- tions of various classes to the soil. In France, again, the trends of the century appear. The restored Bourbons, though forced to recognize constitutional forms, did not even learn from the Revolution that peace and order lay in the development, not the suppression, of liberty, and came back rather with memories of "how they used to do" than ideas of "how they ought to^ do." Their measures against the freedom of the press, as well as those taken after- wards by the third Napoleon, show how thoroughly men have begun to realize that the printing-press is the most formidable of modern political forces, since it is our present " organ of persuasion." That Louis Napoleon, although following much in their footsteps, did not follow the Bourbons into banish- ment, was due to the power of his name, which was associated with an epoch of true national glory, and with the first days of peaceful freedom from the " Old R^ime." By appealing, too, to the universal vote, he not only recognized the fundamental political change of the Revolution,^ but assured his election by throwing it into the hands of an ignorant majority, whose political education had not yet extended far enough thoroughly to comprehend the Napoleons, beyond their "outward show." 1 This is a social element ; added to this, as a political grievance, has been the lack of "Home-rule." (See also p. 159 of this manual, and compare Hungary.) 2 The political revolution of modern times seems to be as thoroughly established in France as in England ; but France is as seriously threatened as the rest of the world by the social revolution springing from the demands of labor, and in Germany the story is the same. 162 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. The special studies on the German Empire and the kingdom of Italy not only show the development of two powerful mod- ern states, but also illustrate the conquering power of ideas and ideals when once the}- reach the popular masses. In both countries the leading movements have been the same, — towards national union, and towards constitutional liberty ; of these, the latter has been part of an impulse common to all the civilized peoples of our century ; the former has been dis- tinctive of Germany and Italy, among the greater powers. In Germany, as in France, the free press has been the terror of the "Old Regime," and for the same reasons ; but in Germany has been added to that the influence of the schools and uni- versities ; the censorship of the press and that of the university have been the new persecutions which these new weapons have evolved ; although Austria has endeavored to meet them by set teaching of the principles and spirit of the older order. When Frederick William the Fourth declares, "A sheet of paper shall not come between me and my subjects," he forgets that, in the large modern state, a sheet of paper is the only possible means of communication between a monarch and his busy, widely-scattered subjects. But the outcome of events in Germany proves, beyond a doubt, the use of long-continued political agitation as an agent of political change. In Germany, as elsewhere, it has led to the full recognition of the principle that government should be for the people and by the people. The development of German unity shows the value of still another power in politics, — the power of enthusiasm. The common forms and traditions, the heroes and the deeds that warmed men's hearts with common pride in the German name, roused that pride at length to the making of an empire and a nation. The latest history of Italy, even more than that of German3% has an epic unity and spirit. In 1815 Savoy alone was under native rule ; her government alone could appeal to native sup- port ajid sympathy. As part of the Holy Roman Empire, THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. 163 Italy had become since the days of Charles the Fifth, partly heritage of Spain, and partly heritage of Austria, while in the days of Pepin and Charlemagne, the pope had received as a gift his part of the soil of the Christian Empire. In Ital}', the movement for nationality, inspired by the love of independence, — and the movement for constitutionalism, in- spired by the love of political liberty, were each sustained by great historic memories, reaching back to the days of the later Koman republic, when Italy was free, united, and great. Although the interference of European monarchs in Neapoli- tan affairs called forth Italian indignation, still it was a pure measure of self-defence, since the stirring of one people against a king might mean the stirring of Europe against the whole monarchic sj'stem ; thus England had stirred France, — France, Spain and German}', — and Spain, in turn, had now roused Naples. Naples, indeed, could have been appeased, and the power of the king established by the prudent and genuine grant of a liberal constitution ; but with the troops of Austria and the sympathies of the monarchs behind him, the Neapolitan ruler naturally underrated the moral forces spring- ing to arms against him. Indeed, the Italian struggle against Austria was throughout the struggle of moral with physical powers. On the side of Austria were troops, and treasure, and the might of an old, successful name ; on the side of Italy were justice, truth, a never-yielding purpose and enthusiasm. Savoy alone was free to embody and lead the Italian aspira- tions, and give them political and military force. Victor Em- manuel as the one Italian, the one constitutional ruler of Italy, could command the respect, the loyalty, the admiration, of the whole peninsula. In order that Italy might win attention and respect from the European commonwealth, Cavour involved her in the Crimean War ; in order that she might claim the sympathy and aid of France, he gave a daughter of old Savoy in marriage to a Napoleonic adventurer, thus taking advan- tage, too, of the historic enmity of Austria and France. The principle of popular government has never been more 164 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. absolutely respected nor more nobly used than in uniting state after state to patriotic, liberal Savoy ; and never has history more nearly touched the highest poetic justice than in the return of a pure Italian government to Rome, at once the geographic and historic centre of the whole peninsula. The question is often asked, ''What is the relation of biography to history? '* In general, it may be said that there are no more important or significant historical facts, and no stronger historical forces, than the lives of men. Wherever the teacher's time is short, and the era he deals with great, he can do no better than to take some one man whose life was thor- oughly mingled with that of his time, and make as exhaustive a study as possible of his character, and its relations to the contemporary world. These character-studies form with younger classes an excellent concrete introduction to more abstract historical inquiries ; and even in the most abstract of these inquiries, one meets here and there men so intimately connected with affairs, that they seem, as it were, to have embodied their age or country in their own strong personalities. Victor Emmanuel belongs beyond a doubt among such men as these ; and Cavour and Mazzini do not fall far short of it. I have, therefore, in p. 533, introduced character-studies of these three, not alone on account of their intrinsic importance, but as excellent examples of the way in which biography and history mingle. Cavour represents the conservative liberal ; the man who neither breaks with the old, nor rejects the new ; a man who is at once a devoted patriot and a prudent statesman ; a thinker, a worker, but in every deed and thought, practical ; with that rare power which can devote itself to an unattained ideal, and at the same time can see the very next step which must be taken to reach it. His patriotism bound him at once to the people and the monarch ; his prudence commanded the respect of the most conservative courts, and tempered the ardent action of the king ; while that genius of practical imagination which saw the THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. 165 possible relations of the distant and the near, enabled him to turn every circumstance and every resource to the freedom and unity of Italy. To accomplish this, he aimed at two things : to make Piedmont the leader of the peninsula ; to bring Italy into the European commonwealth ; while besides these imme- diate objects, his policy alwa3'S had in mind that " inevitable future "of democracy. What Cavour would and did accomplish by a policy of com- promise and delay, Mazzini wished to do by outspoken war on what he hated, and devotion unto death to what he loved. Each nature had its value in the making of Italy ; she needed the utter abandonment of self, the clear vision of ultimate destiny, the religious fervor M Mazzini ; perhaps she needed even more the cool head of Cavour, since her foes were more easily to be overcome by skilful diplomacy and prudent delay than by the most ardent essay of arms or eloquence.^ Although patriotism was the ruling passion in Cavour and Victor Emmanuel, as well as in Mazzini, in Mazzini this passion became a religion, with Italy for its deity and its conscience ; "the martyrs" of the people's cause, "the adoration of prin- ciples," " the omnipotent duty," " your countr}^, a visible evan- gel of love," — these are the phrases of a worship, a faith. If Cavour was the statesman, and Mazzini the prophet of the Italian movement, Victor Emmanuel was its hero ; trained as a soldier, he was bred for a time of war ; reared simply and hardily, lie had the respect of the simple and hardy classes, and could sympathize with them ; trained in the catechism and Roman history, he was a good Catholic and an intelligent patriot ; while he had at command the historic and popular tongues of his own Italy, and the cosmopolitan French of his best neighbor. Not only by training, but by nature, he was the true king of Italy ; an ardent patriot, he loved his land and ' The fact that Mazzini was forced to publish his writings in London, shows that the censorship of the press excluded his influence from Italy as hauch as possible, where he most desired it to be felt ; incidentally, too, it shows the political freedom existing in England. 166 STUDIES IN GENERAL HISTORY. trusted his folk ; a prudent liberal, he neither offended too far the European monarchs when he had not power to withstand them, nor did he hold back freedom from the people for an instant after he felt he could defend it ; but the man was more than the soldier or statesman ; his devoted, self-forgetful enthu- siasm drew to him the hearts of the whole people with a tide of passionate loyalty that swept away every barrier that party, and history, and religion itself could rear. I have named the sketchy extracts, pp. 534-538, a study on socialism, merely for the sake of uniformity, although they are worth little more than to attract aj^tention to the aims of the great social revolution which seems to press nearer and nearer. Per- haps there is no subject of more immediate importance than this, and none more variously understood. The movement in general insists upon a substitution of the co-operative principle for that of competition, and therefore threatens the whole present system of industry ; it would make the state the owner of the means of labor, and therefore threatens all private property at present invested in these means with a transfer, if not with a loss ; its advocates are inspired with an earnest enthusiasm, and not rarely with a genuine devotion, which gives to socialism the power of a faith ; its demands are backed by the actual physical force of an army of laborers, on whom society depends for food, and dress, and shelter, for transpor- tation and protection ; in common with Christianity, it teaches the brotherhood of man, and asserts the principle of helpful, social union, as against the law of the "struggle for exist- ence." After noting these points, the teacher may act his own judgment as to how far he may wisely pursue a study, mate- rials for which he will find ready to his hand in every week's news, and in any population among which he lives. The points to be made from the *' Study on 0," p. 539, are for the most part embodied in the foregoing summary. At THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. 167 least two days should be devoted to this study, the second of which may be profitably spent in a general conversation in regard to the points suggested by the questions. The aim of the teacher in this study should be to rouse the student's interest in the greatness of the movements in the midst of which he himself lives. If the studies from p. 3 to p. 539 have been of any value, the "General Review Study" on the last page needs no comment. AIDS FOR TEACHING GENERAL HISTORY; INCLUDING A LIST OF BOOKS RECOMMENDED FOR A WORKING SCHOOL LIBRARY. BY MARY D. SHELDON, Formerly Professor of History in Wellesley College, Teacher of History in the Oswego Normal School, New York, and Author of Studies ik General History. 3j? Ml 1 1970 1 JUN 2 6 REC'D-::/ " n. • - ^Hli^^-rr/T." Uoiv^^^igSJ^ci. J LJ OOsJHH 54? 09 4 UNIVERSITY OF CAUFORNIA LIBRARY