THE HAYMARKET THEATRE THE HAYMARKET THEATRE SOME RECORDS & REMINISCENCES BY CYRIL MAUDE EDITED BY RALPH MAUDE ILLUSTRATED' LONDON GRANT RICHARDS 48 LEICESTER SQUARE 1903 o .vn/iU // Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON 6* Co. At the Ballantyne Press PREFACE WE have given this book the sub- title of " Some Records and Reminiscences " for the very excellent reason that it exactly describes it. No attempt has been made to write a serious history, and we have only tried to deal with those periods of the theatre's life that are, in our opinion, interesting or entertaining. If our sins of commission are many, our sins of omission are of far greater number, but in the latter case we have sinned with intention. Our debts to authors past and present, and to almost numberless friends, are far too heavy to be repaid by a mere prefatory recital of their names. We would simply beg the reader believe that with- out them we could never have put pen to paper, an undoubted fact which will go far to prove the gratitude we feel so strongly. CYRIL MAUDE. RALPH MAUDE. HAYMARKET THEATRE, June 1903. S73369 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PLATB I. The Haymarket Theatre in 1822 . Frontispiece II. Listen as " Moll Flaggon " in " The Lord of the Manor" To face page 51 III. The "Little Theatre," and the Theatre Royal Haymarket .... 64 IV. The Interior of the Haymarket Theatre, 1795 73 V. Benjamin Webster .... 114 VI. John Baldwin Buckstone ... 128 VII. Charles Mathews the Younger . 133 VIII. John Baldwin Buckstone as "Acres" . 135 IX. Heads of the Court .... 139 X. John Baldwin Buckstone as "Tony Lumpkin" 144 XI. John Baldwin Buckstone as " Sir Andrew Aguecheek" 150 XII. John Baldwin Buckstone as " Scrub" . 160 XIII. Lady Bancroft ,, 166 XIV. Sir Squire Bancroft .... 174 XV. Herbert Beerbohm Tree ... 178 XVI. Frederick Harrison . . . 190 XVII. Miss Winifred Emery (Mrs. Cyril Maude) as " Lady Teazle " 204 XVIII. Cyril Maude (from the portrait by Daniel Wehrschmidt) 226 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE CHAPTER I "At the new Theatre in the Haymarket, between Little Suffolk Street and James Street, which is now completely finished, will be performed a French Comedy as soon as the rest of the actors arrive from Paris, who are duly expected." Extract from Daily Paper, December 15, 1720. SUCH was the advertisement, if bald and not far-reach- ing, that heralded the opening of the theatre whose name is only third in interest in the annals of the stage, and is now borne by a playhouse to whose popularity London, fortune be praised, testifies nightly with all its might. The Little Theatre in the Haymarket was built by a carpenter named Potter mainly as a specu- lation, and as the total amount expended by that gentleman on its construction was but 1500, it is not difficult to realise that it was scarcely pretentious. Nor were its charges excessive : for 55. you had the choice of pit or box, for 2s. 6d. ,the gallery was at your service. Were you a buck, an extra fee would let you loll upon the stage, hand upon sword hilt prepared for provocation. For those were stirring times even for pleasure seekers. You did not take your tickets at a library, nor were you electrically conducted to the door, only to be beckoned by a soft-footed servant to a softer stall, to show your taste by glove-muffled I A : THE HAYMARKET THEATRE handclaps, or the chilly silence that can indeed be felt. Your playgoers of 1720, and many years that followed it, took their pleasure with greater difficulty, and if with considerably less physical comfort, with infinitely greater possibilities of excitement. To-day the majority of us scarcely spend our half guineas at Drury Lane box office in the hope of taking part in a riot, or for the purpose of levelling insult at the head of some disliked performer. Nor am I to believe that Mr. George Alexander takes the Royal Box at His Majesty's Theatre to yell derision at Mr. Tree's clever but inoffensive head. Yet they did all these things in the good old days of the Little Theatre good old days for the public mayhap, but times that no manager would envy now. Let me attempt a picture as I have seen it through the spectacles of the records that still remain to us. Suppose it a first night in those dear old days and happily first nights were more frequent then than now, so frequent indeed that there seemed to be little else ! The time is half-an-hour before the rising of the curtain. The better part of the theatre is full of footmen, sent thither to keep their masters' places not the solemn, arms-folded, impeccable, perfect creatures who have their home in Mayfair to-day, but gruff-voiced, ob- trusive braggarts, coarse and loud of mouth, dressed in velvet and silken hose, and " lolling over the boxes with their hats on, playing over their airs, taking snuff and laughing aloud, or holding dialogues with their brethren from one side of the house to the other : the most useless, insolent, corrupted set of people in Great Britain." The ancient chronicler was no gentle critic. Then as the master strolls in, all velvet and silk and lace and cent, bejewelled and bepowdered, well 2 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE armed and ready for a quarrel, Jeames gives place to him. But Jeames does not leave the theatre. He lays claim to a right to a seat in the upper gallery free of all charge. The manager protests. Heaven help the manager ! Uproar is scarcely the word for Jeames's reply as he literally hacks his way to the seat to which he lays claim. He seated and moder- ately quiet, " ringing up " becomes a possibility, and the play begins, the stage half crowded with bucks in their bravest as gorgeous in their appearance as they are unmannerly in their behaviour, and not only to themselves. They guffaw at a player's slip, and threaten to bring down the house in more senses than one if the piece be not to their liking. And it is scarcely for the unhappy management to interfere. Their swords are as sharp as their wit is brutal, and they are not loth to unsheath. So the players, tremulous for more reasons than one, play their parts. But even if the bucks be quiet, and the footmen cease to roar, and the piece jogs peacefully on, they are not yet at the end of their tremors. For there was nothing of the Walkley or the Archer or the Joseph Knight about the critics of the dear old days. They were not content to wait till the engines were getting ready for the Press to express their opinions. Nor, if the piece threatened success, were rival manager or rival player content to bite a silent, jealous lip. If their wit were keen, they would express it to the delight of the people who sat around them ; and if Nature had denied them humour, she seldom forbad them a coarse tongue in those dear old days. Need I add that the player's lot could scarcely have been a happy one ? His faltering speech, hio trembling gait, his possible lapse of memory were not excused on the plea of nervousness as to-day, 3 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE but became the excuse for a gibe that would surely " dry up " our oldest actor in this year of grace. If truth must be told, when the Little Theatre saw its first years of life the actor was scarce a persona grata. He neither opened bazaars nor knelt at the touch of his sovereign's sword. " Threshing," sighed a sym- pathetic critic of the time, " were not more laborious than acting," and acting had few of the sweet com- pensations we poor players enjoy to-day. 12 a week was no mean salary in those times, and a long run was a thing unknown until Fielding produced his celebrated " Pasquin," which ran for fifty nights, and caused far more sensation than Mr.Penley's record with "Charley's Aunt." The amount of study which my poor prede- cessors must have had to undergo in those dear old days, it makes my blood run cold to contemplate. And the manager's lot was little happier. Though he is still the sport of the public, he was much more so in 1720 and for many years that succeeded it. Not only had he a public of terrible difficulty to please, but he could never open his theatre without fear of a riot, or close it without a shudder as to the possibility of never being able to open it again. He was tied down by this restriction or that, and even when the bucks chose to slash his very hangings to bits, he had little or no redress. He was in constant terror of nearly every patron of his house, yet in everlasting fear of losing them all. Indeed he must sometimes have wondered when making some fresh and daring experiment whether he would ever have a theatre at all at the close of the evening's entertainment ! Even from Royalty he could seldom expect much, for the King did not hesitate to comment in well-bred tones upon the merits of the play of which he was a witness, and if it bore, what he thought to be, allusions 4 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE to himself, his condemnation was often forcible. George III., they say, upon a chambermaid in a farce remarking to an old gentleman, " You are villainously old, you are sixty-six, you cannot have the impertinence to think of living above two years," energetically re- marked in a loud-pitched voice, " What d d stuff ! " Possibly it was sound criticism, but it was distinctly disconcerting to players and manager alike. Nor did the presence of Royalty necessarily quell the uproars that were so frequent in those times. Once on the occasion of a Royal visit the objectionable footmen took occasion to make themselves specially obnoxious, and to such an extent that the Riot Act had to be read, which proving insufficient, no less than eighteen Jeames's had to be conveyed very much the worse for wear to Newgate Gaol. In those days the manager would advertise the coming of Royalty, and if kings or princes were not available, would announce the advent of some other celebrity of the day, reput- able or very much otherwise. For the fact of the matter was that the manager, even more an object of pity then than now, was often put to sore straits to keep his house open, though his expenses' sheet must have shown a queer total as compared with those of 1903. As for the dramatic author, he of the first half of the eighteenth century, at any rate, was a far less modest person than our Pineros, our Barries, and our Marshalls of to-day. Imagine, I beg you, Mr. J. M. Barrie " seated in lofty elevation " on the first night of " The Admirable Crichton," and following with laughter and tears the fortunes of his delightful hero and heroine, pausing only to reprove audibly some player who did not please his creative fancy. That was what Steele did in 1722, and Johnson, if less emotional, loved to 5 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE make himself no less conspicuous. Nor did the dramatist of those days take his failures with quite the same dignity and complacency that characterise our stage authors of to-day, though more than one of them was often frank enough to admit the justice of the condemnation meted out to him. Fielding on one occasion revived a play of his with a superscription "as it was damned at the Theatre Royal," which would strike one as an original line for an author to take to-day ; but then we have so few author-managers ! The author had a deal to contend against in the old days of the theatre. Criticism took such curious turns in those times. " The critics," said Colley Gibber, " come like hounds to a carcass and are all in full cry, sometimes for an hour together, before the curtain rises to throw it amongst them. They seem to me like the lion whelps in the Tower, who are so boisterously gamesome at their meals that they dash down the bowls of milk brought for their breakfast." The pit was of course the part of the house from which the manager had most to fear, and it was more than once found necessary to conciliate the pittites by a speech from the stage before those worthies would allow the piece to proceed ! In the pit, too, the playgoers with a grievance were wont to station themselves, often armed with missiles of a peculiarly objectionable nature. One night, at the beginning of the eighteenth century, a young gentleman who was madly in love with an actress who would have nothing to do with him, got a prominent place in the pit, and proceeded to give vent to his sorrow and spleen by cat-calls and yells of derision, following up these harmonious sounds with a fire of rotten eggs. It is not surprising to hear that some one sitting by the lovesick swain promptly called him a fool and a bully. A duel was the result. 6 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE But the rejected lover had even less pluck than manners, for he begged for his life, which was left to him. A good story is told of a Parisian critic, who upon the introduction of an asp in " Anthony and Cleopatra " that hissed by some mechanical contrivance, turned to the pit and said, " Gentlemen, I fully share the asp's opinion." How could any piece " go " in the face of such a circumstance as that ? And that, if the records are to be believed, is typical of but quite a mild occurrence ! As for the criticisms of the Press of the day, they were indeed as vinegar compared to the sweet water which the player drinks of a morning with his bacon and eggs. To dip into the ancient criticisms is indeed to learn a lesson in the art of writing with a sharp pen. I take one at random from a large collection ; it is collective, so will do duty for many more : " Every charity school would supply a dozen wenches of more decent education, character, more health, youth, beauty and genius than the common run of actresses." That was written in 1733, and was by no means a specially terrible specimen. Another writer of the same period found occasion to say that playhouses were " sad instances of the luxury of the present age." Luxury to whom, forsooth ? Not to the poor manager and players, I dare swear. In fact, the more the manager of 1903 dips into the records of those early eighteenth-century years, the more reason must he have to be grateful for the King, the Parliament, the Press, and even the County Council of his present possession. CHAPTER II THIS, I have already said prefatorily, is not to be re- garded as a serious history. I leave to some other pen the duty of faithful record, the classification, and all the other things that go to make up what was once my schoolboy bugbear. But I am reluctant to leave the babyhood of the Little Theatre surely a more chequered weaning were never known ! without a word, the more so in that one or two persons connected with that important period were by no means of little interest. So I must perforce hark back to 1720, when on December 29 (some have it September 1723, but I cling to my date) the advertised French actors had made the difficult journey from Paris to London in sufficient numbers to enable them to open with "La Fille a la Morte, or le Badeaut de Paris." These actors described themselves as the " Duke of Montagu's French comedians," but even this high- sounding title does not appear to have given them a long term at the Little Theatre, for the follow- ing year found Aaron Hill its manager, who pro- duced " Henry V." with a company of amateurs. From that performance I can find little or nothing of interest in connection with the theatre until Z723, when some amateurs occupied it and played " The Female Fop," whose author claimed that he wrote it at the somewhat immature age of fifteen, THE HAYMARKET THEATRE and in a few weeks into the bargain. The fact would have been more remarkable had it succeeded, but it fell an early victim to " frost," and the Little Theatre was given over to concerts and other entertainments till 1726, when Italian Opera, to which the somewhat incongruous feats of rope-dancing and tumbling were added, reigned in their stead. Indeed it was not till 1733, when Theophilus Gibber and his brother seceders revolted from Drury Lane and appeared on the boards of the Haymarket, that the history of the theatre may be said to have really begun, though I would not for- bear to mention that between 1723 and 1733 gladiators and backswordsmen shared the honours of the boards with English Operas on the Italian model. Theophilus Gibber's era of management, brief though it was, sufficed to bring the Little Theatre into some prominence, a prominence which it never afterwards lost save for very brief periods. Styling his company " The Comedians of His Majesty's Revels," he opened on the 23rd of September with " Love for Love," in which he not only figured himself, but also presented his extraordinary sister, Charlotte Charke, whose history will well bear repetition, so remarkable was it. From the time that Charlotte Charke first trod the boards if not the earth she was possessed of an in- sensate longing to appear in nothing but male char- acters, in which it appeared she did indeed excel. But her love of male impersonation would not bear con- finement to the boards, for after quarrelling with her good father, Colley Cibber, she, after a series of en- deavours to earn a livelihood as a strolling player, a grocer, and a proprietor of a puppet-show, assumed the habit of a man as her ordinary attire, and although in turn " super " and ordinary tramp, was so good- looking that an heiress fell in love with her, and nearly 9 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE died of a broken heart on discovering the true sex of her swain. " Tramping " proved an even harder life than poor Charlotte could stand, so she obtained a situation as a valet, then became a sausage maker, and next a waiter at an inn in Marylebone. Her next venture was a tavern in the Lane, for which her uncle gave her money; but this was a failure, and her brother Theophilus making her an offer, she went back to the Haymarket for a brief spell. From the Little Theatre she went to Russell's puppet-show, where she worked the wires, but here again she made no long stay, and was next to be found in a miserable strolling company making frantic struggles for a bare existence. From strolling player she became author of her own auto- biography, which brought her in enough to open another tavern. But this, too, came to grief, and she was forced to take refuge in a miserable hut, in which she wrote a novel, with a pair of bellows for a desk. 10 was all she got for the book, but she was very near her end, and a benefit at the Haymarket, at which she played Marplot in " The Busybody," brought her in enough to live in some sort of comfort until her death the following year (1760). Surely no actor or actress of whom we have any record had more extraordinary experiences than this remarkable creature, whose temper was probably her worst enemy. Her early bringing up, more a boy's than a girl's, undoubtedly had something to do with her love of impersonating the male. Among the phases of her career was some time spent in prison for debt, her release being procured by a subscription raised among the lowest prostitutes of Drury Lane ! Even worse than the character of the extraordinary Charlotte Charke was that of her brother Theophilus Cibber, whose career ended by his being drowned in 10 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE a journey from Dover to Calais. As the husband of the famous Mrs. Gibber, she brought upon him the contempt of all decent people, for, not content with selling her to a seducer, he brought an action against that person for 5000. The judge awarded him a ten pound note. " That unhanged villain," Dr. Doran has called him, and he was not far wrong. Luckily for the wife, the temptation to which he deliberately exposed her resulted in her obtaining a " protector," which ensured her some happiness during the years that re- mained to her. Mrs. Gibber, by the way, appears to have found the secret of perpetual youth; for she played the part of a girl of sixteen when she was over fifty, and looked it into the bargain. Indeed it is said that she was quite indignant when it was suggested that sixteen should be changed to twenty- three. She was remarkably like Garrick in face, and was about the only lady of his company who could ever manage him. In this production of Theophilus Gibber's at the Little Theatre, the famous Mrs. Pritchard also made her appearance. Much might be written of her; but as this book is strictly confined to the Haymarket Theatre, she deserves no more than a passing mention in this connection. One of the most remarkable features of Mrs. Pritchard's success was the fact that she en- tirely lacked education. They say that of " Macbeth " she had never read more than her own part, in which she made an enormous success ! But knowledge did not seem to be a sine qua non of the period, for the famous Quin was quite surprised when, after having played in Davenant's " Macbeth " for several nights, Garrick informed him that he was going to produce Shakespeare's tragedy. " You don't mean to say we've not been playing Shakespeare all the time ? " ii THE HAYMARKET THEATRE was Quin's astonished remark. Dr. Johnson, with his usual courtesy, called Mrs. Prit chard " the inspired idiot." Perhaps it was almost perfect criticism. " The Comedians of His Majesty's Revels " had but a brief time at the Haymarket, for the year after their appearance we find Fielding its manager with a com- pany which he chose to call " The Great Mogul's Com- pany of Comedians." Of this there is nothing to record, nor indeed of the French comedians who followed. But 1736 was a year big with fate both for the Hay- market and the English stage in general. Fielding again took the Little Theatre, and this time produced his celebrated satirical comedy " Pasquin," aimed directly at the Government, and to whose record run of fifty nights I have already alluded. " Religion, Law, Government, Priests, Judges, and Ministers," says Gibber, " were all laid down by this herculean satirist." London yelled itself hoarse, but the Government, and Walpole in particular, who had been mercilessly caricatured, did not join in the laugh. Instead they passed the Licensing Act which is still law, so that indirectly to the Little Theatre in the Haymarket does Mr. George Redford enjoy his enviable position of Examiner of Plays. In vain did the then Lord Chester- field in a powerful speech defend the liberty of managers, authors, and players alike ; in vain did he dub the Lord Chamberlain's Office the " new Excise Office " the Bill was passed by a large majority, and the Lord Chamberlain became, as Lord Chesterfield had it, "Chief Gauger, Supervisor, Commissioner, Judge and Jury," characters which he still plays to-day. Indeed, the only difference, so far as the law was concerned, between the manager of the Haymarket in 1737 and Harrison and myself to-day, is the fact that they had no London County Council and we have. But 12 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE fortune be praised ! we possess no such irate ministers as Robert Walpole, who thrashed an actor for sneer- ing at his Excise Bill. Luckily there exists no such parallel as Mr. Brodrick threatening Robert Marshall with a horsewhip for taunting the War Office with dilatoriness ! The public took no particular interest in the passing of the Licensing Act, though they insisted on justice being done to the poor English players. The year after the Bill became law some French actors were given authority to open the Little Theatre, power having been denied to an English company. But authority or no authority, the crowd had it their own way, and the play, " L'Embarras de Richesses," never saw Haymarket light. The next feature of importance in the childhood of the Little Theatre, which went through a period of " House Closed " (with very infrequent openings) until 1744, was the appearance in that year of Macklin, who produced " Othello " with a company of amateurs, Foote playing Othello and himself lago. Foote, who has the next chapter of this book to himself, was by all accounts a " frost," as well he might have been ; but Macklin made a success which he repeated after- wards at Drury Lane, whither he went the same year, leaving the Little Theatre to that disreputable gentle- man, Mr. Theophilus Gibber. Gibber had no licence, but he escaped penalty by a clever dodge. He ad- vertised his performance thus : " At Gibber's Academy in the Haymarket will be a concert ; afterwards will be an exhibition (gratis) of a rehearsal, in the form of a play, called ' Romeo and Juliet.'" This venture, however, was no great success. Foote was Theophilus Gibber's successor, and his 13 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE " Diversions of the Morning " became the rage of the town. He, too, had no licence, and invited the public " to drink a dish of chocolate with him." Foote kept the theatre till 1749, when it was very nearly destroyed by a riot. The riot was brought about in this way. An advertisement appeared in the papers as follows : " At the new theatre in the Haymarket, to be seen a person who performs the several most surprising things following, viz. ; First, he takes a common walk- ing cane from any of the spectators, and thereon he plays the music of every instrument now in use, and likewise sings to surprising perfection. Secondly, he presents you with a common wine bottle, which any of the spectators may first examine : this bottle is placed on the table in the middle of the stage, and he without any equivocation goes into it in the sight of all the spectators, and sings in it ; during his stay in the bottle any person may handle it, and see plainly that it does not exceed a common tavern bottle. Those on the stage or in the boxes may come in masked habits (if agreeable to them), and the performer (if desired) will inform them who they are. Stage, 7/6; Boxes, si ', Pit, 3/ J Gallery, 2/. To begin half-an-hour after six o'clock." Needless to say, in face of this entertaining programme an enormous crowd came to the theatre and waited patiently till seven, when, no performer appearing, they proceeded to signify their annoyance in the usual manner of the time. The hubbub produced a person, who promised to return their money if the performer failed to appear, but the audience had evidently lost faith in the management, for upon some one throwing a candle upon the stage a general riot ensued. It was a case of " wigs on the green " with a vengeance. Slash 14 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE went the curtains, crash went the benches, and bang went the boxes. The curtain was torn to ribbons, the scenery shared a similar fate, and the rioters, not content with their night's work, carried the debris outside with them and made a huge bonfire of it in front of the theatre. The Duke of Cumberland in his effort to escape from the crush lost his diamond- hilted sword, upon which a wag bawled out that "Billy the butcher had lost his knife." The unfortunate manager, who declared in the papers that he had been victimised by an unscrupulous scoundrel, got no re- dress. Some put the hoax down to the authorship of His Grace of Montagu, others to that of Samuel Foote ; but the real originator was never discovered. Needless to say, after that night the bottle trick went out of fashion. The riot was soon followed by another, at which a considerable amount of blood was shed. The cause was attributable to a French company, of which the British Public would have none, attempting to play at the Little Theatre. Luckily the theatre never suffered by fire, for " fire the house " was a favourite cry of the bullies of the day during a riot, and more than once the attempt was made in other theatres to put the suggestion in force. After these riots young Gibber again took the theatre, and made his management notable by the introduction of Mrs. Abington to the stage. So short was this famous lady's connection with the Little Theatre that I can find no excuse for an account of her career. She is more noteworthy as the original Lady Teazle, and as Garrick's pet aversion. " She is below the thought of any honest man or woman," said the mighty Roscius ; " she is as silly as she is false and treacherous." But whether Garrick were right or no, 15 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE her powers as an actress have never been called in question, and her success as the heroine of " The School for Scandal," is the more remarkable in that she was born of the gutter and raised herself to her high position by sheer talent and energy. Gibber was once more succeeded in 1760 by Foote, who was prevented from establishing the house as a regular summer theatre until 1762, the theatre having been previously let till then to a teacher of dancing dogs ! But Foote, as I said, has a chapter to himself. 16 CHAPTER III SAMUEL FOOTE was born in the same year that the Little Theatre first opened its doors. There was nothing hereditary about his theatrical talent, for his father was a member of Parliament, and his mother was a daughter of Sir Edmund Goodere, Bart,, and a cousin of the Duke of Rutland. Even in his school- days Foote began to show signs of the genius that was in him, and his imitations of every one with whom he came in contact made him immensely popular with his schoolfellows, who never tired of hearing him " take off " his various relations and friends, to say nothing of the masters. His schooltime over, his father sent him to Oxford, where he made more sensation by his extravagance in dress and his caricatures of the venerable authorities, than by brilliance of intellect or studious application. Foote pere was determined to send his son to the Bar ; so from Oxford to the Temple young Samuel went, but he was no greater success at the Law than at the 'Varsity, though the briefless barristers of the time shouted themselves hoarse over his imitations of the legal luminaries of the day. Nor did Samuel Foote show the slightest love for the calling which his good father had chosen for him, and, an opportunity presenting itself, he joined Macklin's company at the Haymarket, and appeared as Othello, a r6le to which he was as much suited as would be Mr. Herbert Campbell to the part of Hamlet. 17 B THE HAYMARKET THEATRE In plain words, he was a " frost," which was scarcely surprising. At the same time, the old critics found it hard to say what young Foote's particular line was. Upon Boswell remarking to Dr. Johnson, " He has a singular talent for exhibiting character," Dr. Johnson replied, " Sir, it is not a talent, it is a vice ; it is what others abstain from. It is not comedy which exhibits the character of a species, as that of a miser gathered from many misers ; it is a farce which exhibits in- dividuals. '* " Did he think of exhibiting you, sir ? " went on Boswell. " Sir," replied Dr. Johnson, " fear restrained him ; he knew I would have broken his bones. I would have saved him the trouble of cutting off a leg. I would not have left him a leg to cut off." " One Foote a player," was Walpole's contemptuous dismissal of the actor, but he was generally known as " The British Aristophanes," a title which, despite the undoubted wit of his satires, he scarcely deserved. " What the deuce then am I fit for ? " exclaimed Foote himself, having failed both in comedy and tragedy. He soon discovered that his role was that of a caricaturist, and he was probably the greatest mimic that has ever lived. Whom he caricatured, or how gross was the caricature, he cared not at all, though he had a wholesome respect for physical force, and Dr. Johnson's threat to break every bone in his body prevented him taking off that eminent, if irascible, personage, who could not help admiring Foote's genius despite his dislike of the man himself. Foote would caricature anything that would make the public laugh and draw them to the Little Theatre. Physical defects, legal or ministerial blunders, re- 18 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE ligious subjects none came amiss to him, and his lash was never light. But he did not like being hit back, and when Woodward reproduced him on the stage he was very sore about it. He thought nothing, how- ever, of introducing a puppet-show, whose puppets, he declared, would not be " as large as life, not larger, indeed, than Mr. Garrick." But he never had a hit at Barry, out of respect for that gentleman's six-foot of powerful manhood. He was a vain, conceited, extravagant fellow, and managed to run through three fortunes, a fact which he published on the panels of his carriage by the motto " iterum, iterum, iterumque" A good story is told of how when in Scotland he would curl his hair with one-pound notes to show his con- tempt of paper money, which was not in circulation over the border. But when his cook came for orders of a morning Foote would uncurl lock after lock until the good woman had enough money for her day's marketing, a duty which she fulfilled in a sedan-chair ! At his own table in London, when the cloth had been removed, Foote would invariably ask, " Does any one drink port ? " If the answer happened to be " no," he would turn to the servants and bid them " take away the ink." Extravagance in dress was one of his chief foibles, and he was very proud of his descent, of which indeed he had little reason to be ashamed, though his mother's youngest brother, Captain Goodere, strangled his eldest brother on board his own ship in his desire to get hold of the estates. Cooke took Foote one night to a club and introduced him as "Mr. Foote, the nephew of the gentleman who was lately hung in chains for the murder of his brother." Foote was seldom " scored off," but on one occasion a Scottish lawyer had decidedly the best of him. Foote 19 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE having lost a case in Edinburgh, the man of law called on him in London with his bill of costs. On paying it Foote said with a sneer, " I suppose like the rest of you Scotchmen you're going back to Edinburgh the cheapest way possible." " Ay, ay, you're right," said the canny lawyer tapping his pocket full of guineas, " I'm going back on foot." The actor didn't like the joke at all. But if Foote was scored off more than once, the amount of times in which the actor had the best of the joke was almost without number. He was never ill at ease in whatever company he found himself. One night some one took him into White's and asked him to wait a moment while he wrote a note. Foote stood there looking, so Lord Carmarthen who was present thought, rather embarrassed. His lordship wishing to be civil, but being at the same time extremely shy himself, went up to him, and for want of something better to say, remarked, " Mr. Foote, I think your handkerchief is falling out of your pocket." Foote hurriedly pushed the article back and bowed his thanks. " It is most kind of you, my lord," he said ; " you know the company better than I do." But Foote, despite his caustic tongue, was in great request at smart young men's dinner-parties, and took the lead in the conversation, whatever the subject might happen to be. His popularity in this respect is rather surprising, seeing that it is to be believed that he was " very disgusting in his manner of eating, and not cleanly in his person." George Colman the younger says that the end of his nose was always plentifully bestrewed with snuff, but he boasted of being a great judge of wine and cooking, and professed a perfect horror of plain dishes. Though he was often threatened with personal 20 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE violence on account of his bitter wit, he was nearly always ready with the " soft answer." One night at a party some one wanted to get up a quarrel with him on account of his personal satire. " Of course I take all my friends off," v said Foote, " but I use them no worse than myself. I take myself off." " Gad so," said one of the company, " that's a thing I should mightily like to see." Whereupon Foote promptly took up his hat and left the room. On another occa- sion, after his production of " The Nabobs," aimed at Anglo-Indians in particular, a party of irascible gentle- men called at his house with the intention of giving him a good hiding ; but so charmingly did Foote re- ceive them, and so clear was his explanation that the satire was not intended to refer to them, but only to naughty old Anglo-Indians, that instead of thrash- ing him they stayed to dinner and made a big night of it! Solemn occasions, old friendships, high rank no- thing was sacred enough to prevent Foote exercising his wit when so minded. On one occasion, upon a man meeting him after the funeral of his old friend Charles Holland, whose father was a baker, he said, " Yes, I've just seen poor Holland shoved into the family oven." On another he invited Sheridan to his theatre, put him in the most prominent place possible, and then, to the great dramatist's intense annoyance, proceeded to caricature him broadly upon the stage to the delight of the audience, who, of course, recognised both the original and the caricature. Foote's disposition was intensely jealous, and he never forgave Garrick his great success. Garrick's triumph at Stratford on the occasion of the Shakespeare jubilee brought a sharp retort from Foote upon the inoffensive head of a gentleman who tried to make himself agree- 21 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE able to the actor by talking to him of the excellence of the performance they had just seen. Foote at first listened in silence, then suddenly asked if Warwick- shire had the honour of being his father as well as Shakespeare's. " No, sir," replied the gentleman, "I am from Essex." " Ah," replied Foote, remembering that Essex was a county famous for its cattle, " from Essex indeed ! and who drove you ? " The Duke of Cumberland also had a somewhat nasty experience of the actor's wit. Going round behind one night to see him before the performance, he said politely, " Here I am, Foote, ready as usual to swallow all your good things." " Indeed," was Foote's reply, " then your Royal Highness must have a mighty good digestion, for you never bring any up again." When his friend Sir Francis Delaval died Foote burst into tears, but smiled again when they told him that the surgeons were going to examine the baronet's head. " It's useless," he said ; " I've known it for years, and have never been able to find anything what- ever in it." No man ever lived who could snub a bore better than Foote. One day while at Bath a pompous old doctor took him aside and confided to him that it was his intention to publish his own poems. " But, sir," he went on, " I have already so many irons in the fire that I really don't know what to do." " Take my advice," said Foote confidentially, " and put your poems where the irons are." One of Foote's company was per- petually humming the same air, and the manager asked him why the deuce he did it. " The fact is, Mr. Foote," said the actor, " it haunts me." " And small wonder," 22 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE replied Foote, " seeing that you are for ever murder- ing it." Despite Foote's ready wit he was extremely sensitive, especially to criticism, and a bad notice was a thing he dreaded and disliked more than anything else. He never forgave Dr. Johnson for saying that he was an infidel " as a dog is an infidel " ; and he begged the Duchess of Kingston to stop the attacks made upon him in the Press, promising to suppress " The Trip to Calais " if she would do so. Despite his unconquerable jealousy of Garrick, the great Roscius had much affection for him, and said that he was " a man of wonderful abilities, and the most entertaining companion I have ever known." Garrick was much delighted when Foote put a bust of him in his private room. " Ah, I see," he said, laugh- ing, " you are not afraid to put me close to your gold and bank-notes." " Well, you see, David," was the rejoinder, " you've got no hands." One day when Garrick and Foote were out walking the latter dropped a guinea. " Where the deuce can it have gone to ? " he said after a few minutes' search. " To the devil," suggested Garrick. " Trust you, David," replied Foote, " for making a guinea go farther than any one else." Another day, when Foote and Garrick were out walking together, a sweep rode by on a thorough- bred horse. " There goes Warburton on Shakespeare," cried Foote. Perhaps one of his best mots was when Mr. Howard told him that he was going to publish a second edition of "Thoughts and Maxims." "Yes," was Foote's comment, " second thoughts are always best." When Foote was told that the Rockingham Cabinet was ex- hausted, he remarked that it was certainly not the length of its journey that had fatigued it. 23 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE One night Foote had very much the better of Macklin. The latter declared at his tavern that he had brought his memory to such a pitch of perfection, that he could repeat anything after once hearing it, whereupon Foote promptly handed him Johnson's famous sentence beginning, " So she went into the garden to cut a cabbage leaf to make an apple pie ; and at the same time a great she-bear coming up the street, &c." Macklin " retired hurt," and was never heard to boast of his memory again. Macklin was " scored off " by Foote on yet another occasion. A number of people were collected at Macklin's tavern to hear the actor lecture, Foote being among the company. Foote was very noisy, and his interruption annoyed the lecturer considerably. " Can- not you remain silent ! " cried Macklin ; " do you know what I am going to say ? " " Gad no," answered Foote, " do you ? " Foote's wit could often be brutal as well as rude. One night when Digges made his first appearance in London in " Cato " at the Haymarket under George Colman the elder's management, the actor dressed the part after the manner adopted by Booth when the piece was originally produced, the costume including what was known as a " shape " decorated with gilt leather upon a black ground, with black stockings, black gloves, and a powdered periwig. Digges stalked on in this extraordinary costume, and met with a hearty reception from the audience. Foote, who was in the pit, waited until the applause had died down, and then exclaimed in what was supposed to be an undertone, though every one around could hear it, "A Roman chimney-sweeper on May-day 1 " The pit roared, and poor Digges old stager as he was, for he had been long in the provinces very nearly " dried up " altogether. 24 THE HAYMARKEr THEATRE Foote tried a joke on the Archbishop of Canterbury, who was not to be caught. The actor forwarded a copy of " The Minor " to the Primate (a play so gross and indecent that Irish audiences would have none of it, though it was a big success in England), with the polite request that if His Grace saw anything objection- able in it he would strike it out. But the Archbishop sent it back without a mark, and declared afterwards to a friend that if he had put a pen to the manuscript Foote would straightway have advertised it "as corrected and prepared for the stage by His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury." And, judging by what history tells us of Foote's character, he probably would. It was Foote's inordinate vanity that cost him the loss of a leg. He was staying with Lord Mexborough, among whose other guests was the Duke of York. One night after dinner he openly boasted of his horseman- ship, which was distinctly inferior to his acting. A horse was promised him for the hunt next day, and being too proud to back out of it, he mounted his steed and rode off with the rest. But the moment hounds found, Foote was thrown and broke his leg in two places. The surgeon found amputation necessary, and it must be put down to Foote's credit that he bore his loss with great pluck, declaring soon after the operation that he was really not sorry, for he would be able to caricature the one-legged George Faulkner of Dublin absolutely to the life. " Make no allusion to my weakest part," he said to some one who had the bad taste to chaff him about his lost leg ; " did I ever attack your head ? " But the loss of his leg brought him great good fortune, and earned for the Little Theatre the new title of Theatre Royal, which it has borne ever since. For 25 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE the Duke of York was so sorry for poor Foote that he obtained for him the patent of the theatre, together with a licence to open from the I5th of May to the I5th of September. Foote thereupon bought the lease of the new premises, incorporated a house in Little Suffolk Street, removed two shops which were in front in the Haymarket, built a portico, and added a second gallery. Thus improved and enlarged, and with its Royal Patent, the Haymarket literally boomed, and in 1768, when Foote produced his " Devil on Two Sticks," he cleared close on 4000, scarcely a penny of which was left by the end of the year. In this piece he cari- catured the President of the College of Physicians, who took the joke so well that he sent Foote his muff, an article that the actor had forgotten as being specially characteristic of the good-natured doctor. Foote's wooden leg does not appear to have in- commoded him to any important degree, for he managed to get about the stage with almost as much agility as ever, but it must have been a pathetic sight to see the actor leaning against the wall of his dressing-room while his " dresser " arranged the artificial member to suit the rest of the costume that his master was wearing. Indeed, it would appear that it was only at such times that Foote felt his loss at all keenly, though it un- doubtedly hastened his end. Colman describes how he once visited Foote, and found the leg " standing by his bedside, ready dressed in a handsome silk stocking with a polished shoe and gold buckle awaiting the owner's getting up." It was hardly necessary for Colman to add that "it had a kind of tragi-comical appearance." Foote had a stroke of paralysis in 1777, and was advised to get change of air and scene on the Continent, but got no farther than Dover, where he died, with a 26 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE joke on his lips, on the 2ist of October. He was buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey. Some six months before his death Foote handed over the Little Theatre to the elder Colman for an an- nuity of 1600, but he lived only long enough to get one half-year's dividend, so that Colman got the whole concern for a paltry 800. Whatever Foote's personal character may have been and his faults were as numerous as his plays one scarce dare think what the Little Theatre in the Hay- market would have become without him. Not only did he, as a " popularity-monger " as he called him- self bring it into prominence, but he reconstructed it and secured for it the Royal Patent that changed its name to the title it bears to-day. Though his dra- matic zeal was neither of the highest nor the purest, his satires were always crammed full of wit, and they were often funniest when in their worst taste. He does not seem to have been an unkind manager, for he gave considerable encouragement to Charles Bannister of the fortunate throat, whose habits o' nights were scarcely conducive to singing at the very early hour at which Foote began his preformances. " I am all right at night," said the unfortunate Charles to his manager, " but neither I nor my voice can get up in the morning." Foote so enjoyed the joke that he gave Bannister every encouragement good nature which led to that actor achieving a big success, though he came a tremendous cropper over the Royalty Theatre just as he was on the highroad to a consider- able fortune. But even in the midst of his greatest difficulties Bannister " would have his little joke." All the world was talking of the death of Sir Theodosius Bought on, who was poisoned by laurel-water. " Don't talk to me of laurel-leaves," said Bannister; " I fear 27 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE none but a bailiff (bay-leaf)." A story of Bannister's son will also bear repetition : " Jack," said his father one day when the boy had annoyed him, " I'll cut you off with a shilling." " I wish, father," replied his son, " that you'd give it me now." John Palmer made his debut at the Haymarket with Charles Bannister, and two more nervous actors prob- ably never trod the boards for the first time. But with experience success came to Palmer too, though, like Bannister, his circumstances were nearly always embarrassing. At one time so hard pressed was he that he had to live in his dressing-room at the theatre, and on another occasion, when having to leave Drury Lane to play a season at the Haymarket, he was con- veyed thither in a cabinet among a cartload of scenery to avoid arrest ! One day Palmer was in his garden at Kentish Town when a wasp stung him in the eye so badly that he had to send his excuses to the theatre. The manager went on and apologised for the actor's absence, but the audience would have none of his excuses, and so great was the clamour that there was nothing for it but to make an attempt to fetch Palmer to the theatre despite his accident. Palmer came and went on the stage just as he was. He was greeted with a fire of orange peel and a storm of hisses by the audience, exasperated at being kept waiting. At last they allowed Palmer to speak. " Ladies and gentlemen," said he, " I am aware of the odd effect my appearance here may produce after the apology which has been made for my illness, which I thought it hardly possible to describe by communi- cation to the theatre. The fact is, ladies and gentle- men, my illness was all my eye ! " Palmer was notoriously unpunctual, his pet excuse 28 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE being that his wife had been confined, but he made the excuse so often that it was calculated that the good lady became a mother at least once a quarter ! More than once, too, he shammed illness, sometimes not sending his excuses to the theatre until the last moment, and that on a first night. He was once very nearly caught by Sheridan, who called with Kelly to inquire after the actor's health. Luckily Kelly preceded Sheridan up the stairs, and was just in time to tip Palmer the wink and keep Sheridan outside until the truant had rolled himself in a dressing-gown in the simulated agonies of toothache. So well did he act that Sheridan was much impressed, and begged him to take the greatest care of himself. Palmer's father was a bill-sticker. One evening when the actor was strutting about the green-room in a pair of glittering buckles, some one remarked that they looked like real diamonds. " Sir," said the actor, much annoyed, " I never wear anything else but real diamonds . " " Pardon me," was the answer, " I remember when you were nothing but paste." " Why don't you stick him against the wall ? " whispered Bannister. He was the most casual of actors. One night he had to speak a prologue, not one word of which he had committed to memory. Luckily there was an uproar among the audience, of which Palmer took immediate advantage. He gesticulated wildly, moved his lips, but spoke not a word. Then when silence was more or less restored he pretended to stop speaking and gazed reproachfully at the audience, who promptly divided themselves into two parties and stormed at one another. In the midst of this fresh row Palmer pretended to finish his prologue, and bowed himself out before the luU came. He was called " Plausible Jack." " Plausible indeed," he said one day. " The only plausible thing 29 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE I ever did was to persuade a bailiff once to bail me." Palmer fell dead on the stage in the middle of " The Stranger." A great favourite in Foote's company, especially with Royalty, was Parsons, who, like Arthur Roberts, loved nothing better than to make the other people on the stage with him laugh by saying some absurd thing in an undertone. Parsons took great liberties with his audiences, no matterwhat their composition. One night George III. commanded a performance of " The Siege of Calais." In this Parsons played the chief carpenter, who after erecting the scaffold for the execution of the patriots, has to say, " So the King is coming. An the King like not my scaffold, I am no true man." But instead of speaking this line Parsons went close to the Royal box and shouted, " An the King were here and did not like my scaffold I would say, Damn him, he has no taste ! " It is on record, strange to say, that no one enjoyed this extraordinary sally more than His Majesty himself. Four days after Parsons died his wife married their son's tutor, so that she had the somewhat remarkable experience of having two husbands in the house at the same time one dead, the other living. Parsons lived for many years in a tiny house near the Lambeth Asylum, which he called Frog Hall, owing to its being opposite to a stagnant ditch. Baddeley, whose Twelfth Night cake, for which he left 100 in the three per cents, in order that it might be " partaken of annually for ever," is still eaten annually at Drury Lane, was another member of Foote's company. Before he went to the Hay- market he is supposed to have had the honour of being Foote's cook. This story is borne out by Foote's remark when Baddeley challenged him to a duel with 30 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE swords. " Here's a pretty fellow," said the great actor ; "I allow him to take my spit and stick it by his side, and now he wants to stick me with it." Shuter, too, played under Foote's management. He was an extremely droll actor, whose chief fault was his excessive love of the bottle. When hissed for his per- formance in " Wife in the Right," he excused himself to the audience on the plea that he had been too ill to attend the rehearsals. " But," he added, " if there be any one here who would like to know whether I was drunk three days before, I acknowledge that I was, and beg pardon for that." No one, not even Shuter himself, knew who his parents were, and he is supposed to have owed his success in life to remembering when a pot-boy at an inn the number of a hackney coach in which a customer had left his pocket-book. So pleased was the customer upon regaining his property that he sent the boy to be properly educated. He loved low com- pany, and thoroughly enjoyed displaying his talents to the denizens of St. Giles. His wit was very ready. One day a friend, seeing him stare vacantly in front of him, asked him if he had bottled his eyes. " Yes," answered Shuter, " and I'm shortly going to cork my eyebrows." At a dinner party one night he sat very silent, to the great disappointment of the company. "Come, Mr. Shuter," said one of the exasperated guests at length, "when are you going to begin to be comical? " " Gad," said Shuter, " I've forgotten my fool's dress. Will you be my substitute while I go and fetch it ? " The guest agreed, whereupon Shuter took up his hat and stick, and left altogether. Quick, the original Tony Lumpkin, was George III.'s favourite comedian, and a very popular member of Foote's company. He was a vain little fellow, who believed in no one but himself, and could not bear to 31 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE hear of any new player acting one of his " creations." Foote he literally loathed. Quick played for thirty- six years, and retired with 10,000 in his pocket. Until the last day of his life he fully believed that had he secured an opportunity of speaking to George III. alone, His Majesty would have made his daughter a maid of honour. The belief arose from an incident which occurred to Miss Quick when of a very tender age. She was walking in the Park with her father when George III. with a military escort passed by. The child, frightened by the noise and the display, tried to escape by the railings, but stuck fast half-way through. The King, hearing the noise of the child's yells, inquired what the matter was. Quick, who by this time had extricated his offspring, explained. " Good girl," said His Majesty, "don't cry, don't cry." And to still further soothe her, added, " Be a good girl, and you shall be a maid of honour when you're old enough." CHAPTER IV WHEN Foote was negotiating the disposal of the patent of the Haymarket Theatre he had no idea that he was dealing with his old friend George Colman, the business being contracted through an agent. "There's a fat- headed felLow of an agent who has been boring me every morning at breakfast with terms from some blockhead who knows nothing about the stage, but whose money burns in his pocket," Foote said to Colman one day, adding that " of course nobody can conduct so peculiar a theatrical business as mine but myself." " Playhouse mad, I suppose," replied Colman sym- pathetically. "Just so," said Foote ; " and if bleeding will bring him to his senses, he'll find me a devilish good doctor." Foote's face when he met Colman a few days after- wards to sign the deed can be better imagined than described ! In addition to an agreement to pay Foote 1600 for life, Colman also arranged to pay for his services as an actor, and to give him 500 for the copyright of his unpublished dramatic pieces. The patent allowed him to open the theatre from the i5th of May to the I5th of September. With the theatre Colman also took over the effects, which seem to have been but a sorry lot. Foote's wardrobe, indeed, can scarcely have deserved 33 c THE HAYMARKET THEATRE the title, for the stock consisted entirely of a few old coats and waistcoats. For, however careful the English Aristophanes may have been about his own appearance on the stage, the costume of his brother actors troubled him not at all. " So vilely did some of the apparel fit the actors," says George Colman the younger, " that he (Foote) was often obliged to make a joke of the dis- grace, and get a start of the audience if he could, in a laugh against his own tatterdemalions." One unfor- tunate member of the company, who was extremely thin a sort of living skeleton was provided with a coat which would have done honour to the hand- some proportions of my good friend Harry Keble. Foote always addressed this personage during the play as " the Gentleman with the sleeves." Foote's own dresses were always hired, as indeed was the music for the band. Foote only played twice under George Colman's management, though the play-bills show that he was advertised several times afterwards. But his health had broken down so utterly that he could muster no more strength to tread the boards, and his death followed shortly afterwards. George Colman the elder met with little success on his first attempt to attract the public to the Hay- market. Contrary to the good judgment that he afterwards exercised, he insisted on opening the theatre before Drury Lane and Covent Garden had closed their doors. Having nothing in particular with which to attract the public, empty houses were the rule, and the notice went up a few days after the advertising of the first performance. Ten days or so later, however, Colman reopened again, " show- ing " every night instead of every alternate night, as Foote had done. 34 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE Every one prophesied failure for Colman, but he knew his own business better than they did, and three new stars, whom he introduced to the British public in the persons of the famous Henderson, Edwin, and Miss Farren, soon made the people and the money flow in. Colman had indeed a splendid company. In addition to the three great players I have just mentioned, Palmer and Parsons were also members of his company, as well as the elder Bannister, who was in fine voice, and Digges, whom Foote insulted so grossly on his appearance as Cato. Foote, by the way, watched Colman's success with very jealous eyes. One day not long before his death he came into the theatre when a rehearsal was in progress. " How do you go on ? " he asked. " Pretty well," replied Colman, " but I can't teach one of these fellows to gape as he ought to." " Can't you ? " sneered Foote ; "then read him your last comedy and he'll yawn for a month ! " Not long after Colman took the theatre he set about making some exceedingly necessary structural altera- tions. One of the most essential was an approach to the boxes, which in Foote's time were practically flush with the street, so much so that the unfortunate people who sat in them often lost the thread of the plot they were following owing to the disturbing noises of such things as post-horns and news-sellers' voices, to say nothing of the rattle of hackney coaches and other distracting influences. Colman also did not a little in the way of much-needed decoration, for the impro- vident Foote had left the theatre in anything but an elegant condition. But, even after the carpenter and decorator had left it, the theatre can scarcely have been a temple of ease and luxury, and a County Council inspector would 35 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE probably have fallen dead at the sight of it. What would have happened had it been set on fire by the genial young bucks of the day it is scarcely difficult, though it is decidedly unpleasant, to imagine. But Colman had no County Council to put him right, and made no attempt to enlarge his passages, which, his son says, were so narrow that when two stout gentle- men happened to meet in one of them and tried to pass each other there was great danger of their sticking fast. " I often thought," the younger Colman wrote, " during my own possession of the diminutive theatre, it would be better to furnish my side-box customers with a bell to tie round their necks at the pay door of the house, on the same principle as that of providing waggon horses with such tinkling apparatus to give notice of their approach and prevent confusion and jostling in cross lanes." The audience, however, did not seem to mind much, for they could see and hear, which, ap- parently, was more than they could do at the new Drury Lane and Covent Garden, " those covered Salis- bury plains," in which it was suggested that " 'Twere better they began On the new invented plan, And with telegraph transmitted us the plot." One word more as to these audiences. Like the theatre they had greatly improved, though they were to show at the beginning of the next century by the O. P. Riots that there was a good deal of the old Adam still left in them. But by the time the elder Colman took over the reins of the " Little Theatre " consider- able improvement had taken place in the playgoer's manners. Their comparative banishment from the stage they bore with good temper ; and if they were far more ready to express their opinion (especially their 36 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE bad opinion) than are the audiences of 1903, they had learned to do so in a more decent manner, and the elder Colman was able to open his theatre night after night without fear of having it half demolished or set alight. The servants, however, still seem to have given trouble, as a letter dated 1737, and published in a contemporary journal, clearly shows. The letter runs: " Theatricus requests the manager of the Theatre Royal in the Haymarket would give orders to the boxkeepers that the servants who are sent to keep places do take off their hats, as their wearing them is an indecency suffered in no theatre out of England." In George III. the drama generally had a good friend and a most appreciative audience, though His Majesty infinitely preferred comedy to tragedy. When Henderson made his appearance at Co vent Garden as the hero of " The Mysterious Husband," George III. was so overcome by the death scene that he turned his back on the stage, exclaiming, " Charlotte, don't look, it's too much to bear." By Royal command the play was never re- peated ! The young King of Denmark, however, who married George III.'s sister, and was a great playgoer when in this country, was scarcely so sensitive as his brother-in- law, for he frequently fell fast asleep during the performance. Mrs. Bellamy was so annoyed at his inattention that one night having to speak the line, " O thou false lord ! " she went as close as she could get to the King's box, and literally yelled the words into the Royal ear. Her energy had the effect of rousing His Majesty to some show of attention. A distracting feature of the audience of the time was the attention paid to the reigning belles who graced the theatre with their presence, though advan- tage was often taken of the interest they induced to 37 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE advertise their coming well beforehand. But take it aft in all, a decided improvement had set in as regards the playgoing public, an improvement which continued until it culminated in the almost perfect playgoer of to-day. Let me take this opportunity of offering the thanks I owe him and her. Place aux dames. So among George Colman's bright particular stars who brought good fortune to the reno- vated Little Theatre first attention must be paid to Miss Farren, who in less than a score of years after her London debut as Miss Hardcastle in " She Stoops to Conquer " was to become the Countess of Derby, and to retire from the stage at the height of her triumphal career. Though not coming of a theatrical stock, Elizabeth Farren caught stage fever from her eccentric and not over fortunate father, who started life as a surgeon, and threw his knife out of the window to manage a strolling company. His little daughter first appeared as Columbine at Wakefield, where she was seen by a Liverpool manager, who, recognising her talent and appreciating her beauty, took her to Cottonopolis and brought her out in his theatre, much to the detriment of the hearts of half the youths in that city. But Elizabeth Farren was too clever and too lovely to stay long in the provinces, and an engagement offered by George Colman the elder led to her first appearance in London at the Haymarket. She became a favourite almost from the day she first curtsied to an audience, and Colman soon found that he had indeed made a good dip in the provincial lucky tub. Miss Farren was a grande dame by nature, and very few actresses have queened it upon the stage to better effect than she. She was tall and slight, with a particularly lovely expression, and her manner of speaking and general 38 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE refinement were such, that she was soon as great a favourite in society as on the stage. She was given the honour of managing the private theatricals at the Duke of Richmond's, where two men promptly fell in love with her in the shape of Fox and the Earl of Derby. Lord Derby's affection was re- turned, but there was a stumbling-block to their marriage in the shape of a living Countess. So Lord Derby and Elizabeth Farren waited for an end which was delayed for many years. With what their relationship was during that delay I have nothing to do. Scandal-mongers said one thing, and fervent admirers gave them the lie. Walpole wrote : " Miss Farren is as excellent as Mrs. Oldfield, because she has lived with the best style of men in England," but this was not necessarily a reflection upon her character. Mrs. Inchbald has told a story which, though scandalous, is too good not to be re- peated. One night one of the ladies at the Haymarket, of, I regret to say, extremely bad repute, met with some accident in her dressing-room and sought the shelter of Mrs. Wells's, the latter lady being the mistress of a certain well-known officer of the day. But Mrs. Wells was so shocked at the intrusion of such a disreputable character that she ran to Miss Farren's room for pro- tection. Whereupon Miss Farren flounced out of her apartment, exclaiming, " What would Lord Derby say if I should be seen in such company ? " The degrees of morality are distinctly interesting, Se non & vero, e ben trovato. But whatever her previous character, Elizabeth Farren became Countess of Derby on the 8th of April 1797, exactly six weeks after the death of her prede- cessor to the title. She made her final bow to a 39 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE theatrical audience on the day preceding the nuptials, playing Lady Teazle with much effect, though she broke down at the lines, " Let me also request, Lady Sneer- well, that you will make my respects to the scandalous college of which you are a member, and inform them that Lady Teazle, licentiate, begs leave to return the diploma they granted her, as she leaves off practice and kills characters no longer," At the end of the piece the future Countess was led forward, while one of the actors addressed the audience thus " But, ah ! this night adieu the mournful mien, When Mirth's loved favourite quits the mimic's scene ! Startled Thalia would assent refuse, But Truth and Virtue wooed and won the Muse." In taking John Henderson from Bath to make his debut at the Little Theatre in no less a character than that of Shylock, George Colman the elder made yet another fortunate dip in the provincial lucky tub. The engagement was made in the face of Henderson's previous rejection at the hands of two other London managers, and despite a howl of scorn from Garrick, who, jealous actor that he always was, surely never betrayed more jealousy than in the case of the young actor from Bath. From the day that Henderson first made up his mind to tread the boards for a living he was a fervent admirer of the " theatrical monarch," and by constant practice imitated him to perfection. But this accomplishment was no particular help towards getting the engagement at Drury Lane that he coveted so much. However, after some diffi- culty he managed to get a few moments with one Hiffernan, a hanger-on of Garrick's, who immediately asked him to be so good as to " please to stand upon his pins." Henderson got up. " Now," said Hiffer- 40 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE nan, " we'll soon see whether you'll make an actor." Whereupon he attached an old table-knife to a piece of string, and getting the former level with Henderson's head, let it fall to the ground. This performance over, he proceeded solemnly to measure the length of the string with a two-foot rule. Having done this, Hiffernan shook his head sadly : " Young gentleman," he remarked, " I am sorry to mortify you, but go your ways home, set your thought on something else, mind your business, be what you will. For the sock and buskin you won't do you will not do, sir, by an inch and a quarter." Discouraged but not deterred from his purpose, Henderson looked for another London engagement, but finding none applied to Garrick again. Garrick made him rehearse, and at the close dismissed him with a wave of his hand. " You have too much wool or worsted in your mouth," he said. " You must get rid of this before you are fit for Drury Lane stage." Henderson, however, was revenged on Garrick for this sally, for upon the great actor hearing that " the player from Bath " could imitate him to the life, he invited him to his house. " Do, my dear sir, let me hear what I am," asked Garrick at dessert. Henderson demurred, but was persuaded. The company were delighted at the imitation and roared with laughter, but Garrick was furious. " Egad," he said, " if that be my voice I have never known it myself ; it is certainly dissimilar to everything I conceived of mine." From that moment Garrick had no good word for Henderson. He declared that he had heard that he " swallowed his part like an eager glutton, and spewed his undigested fragments in the face of the audience." He called his Don John " a comic Cato," and his Hamlet " a mixture of tragedy and comedy, pastoral farce and nonsense." 41 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE In fact, nothing was bad enough for the man who had so successfully " taken him off." But Henderson weathered the storm of Garrick's cruel sarcasm, and attained the object of his desire with his engagement by the elder Colman. The manager insisted upon his making his first appearance as Shy- lock, fearing lest his somewhat awkward, ungainly presence, which would be little noticed in the Jew's cloak, might not otherwise be appreciated by the audience. Henderson was an instantaneous success, and even Macklin approved the performance, though some time before he had told the young actor that he had to unlearn everything he had learned. " And yet, sir," said the modest Henderson, as he thanked the old actor for his words of praise, " I have never had the advantage of seeing you in the character." " Sir, it is not necessary to tell me that," replied Macklin. " I knew you had not, or you would have played it differently." Lord Camden wrote to Garrick after the performance to say that " your Birmingham counterfeit has stolen your buskin and runs away with all your applause into the bargain ; but I shall soon see him stripped to the skin and exposed in all his Scotch nakedness. I hope your friend Colman is not privy to the trash we see every day in the papers to put off this clumsy fellow." But the opinion of the general public did not coincide with his lordship's (which was intended to curry favour with Garrick), for Henderson became the darling of the Little Theatre, and was accepted with rapture even in the character of the " handsome hero," which in appearance he certainly was not. What he possessed was that true dramatic fire that all the criti- cism and all the sneers and all the bad luck can never quench. 42 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE He only played one season at the Little Theatre, but he brought money to the elder Colman's coffers to such good effect that a benefit (which was not bargained for in his agreement) was given him. At the close of the evening the treasurer handed him the bill for " house charges," with Mr. Colman's compliments. It ran thus s. d. 000 A pretty, tasteful compliment ! Henderson, if not really a great actor, deserves the adjective remarkable. He was ungainly of figure, with legs and arms too short for his body ; he had an un- melodious voice and an awkward trick of spreading the palms of his hands outwards, and he had picked up some bad mannerisms on the Bath stage. But his memory was prodigious, and if any one read a passage from some book to him, he could at once repeat it with perfect ease. When cast for a new part, he read the whole play, learned his part, read the piece again, and then never troubled himself any more about it until a fortnight before the production. Con- trary to the usual custom of an actor, he was in the habit of " doing himself extremely well " at dinner on a first night, sitting over his wine until summoned to the theatre. One day a friend persuaded him that this was a mistake, and when a new piece was put on Henderson fed frugally beforehand. The result was a failure, for he is said to have simply " walked through " his part that night. He died at the age of forty. In the same company with Henderson and Miss Farren was John Edwin, who from all accounts must have been one of the most humorous actors the Hay- market has ever known. No actor has in all probability 43 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE got on more intimate terms with his audience than this excellen ^comedian. He never played with his fellow- actors, but cfcvoted his entire attention to the front of the houstt*-r-a method which, though in direct contra- vention *t all theatrical laws, seems to have amused the public immensely. What he said to the audience did not matter to him in the least. He would appear on the stage exceedingly tipsy ; he would forget his words altogether they forgave him everything. One night when playing Bowkit in " The Son-in-law," in which Cranky declines to accept him as a son-in-law on account' of his ugliness, Edwin pronounced the word " ugly " in tones of great surprise, and going close to the footlights addressed the audience thus : " Now, I submit to the decision of an enlightened British public, which is the ugliest fellow of the three I, old Cranky, or that gentleman in the first row of the balcony box ? " As a matter of fact Edwin was a good-looking fellow, with a naturally comical face an asset by no means to be despised. His byplay appears to have been quite extraordinary, and Henderson relates how when playing Sir Hugh Evans, Edwin kept the house in howls of laughter for several minutes without speaking a word. He was probably the best burletta singer that ever lived, and some one once said that whenever Edwin died O'Keefe, who owed not a little of his suc- cess to the actor's talent, would be damned. Edwin's great failing was his love of brandy. " Had he but imitated the habit that christened him," said Boaden, when writing of his Tipple in " The Flitch of Bacon," " he might long have continued the most diverting creature the modern stage has known." Another extremely humorous and clever member of the elder Colman's company was the Bannister of whom 44 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE I have already given an anecdote. Jack Bannister began his stage career in tragedy under the great Garrick, but after a while he grew tired of serious parts, and declared his desire for comedy. " No, no," said Garrick, " you may humbug the town some time longer as a tragedian, but comedy is a serious thing." How- ever, it was in comedy that Bannister was to make a big success, though it can fairly be said of him that he was bad in nothing. He was just the opposite of Edwin in that he never paid any attention to his audience, and no applause, however loud, ever made him forget for an instant the part he was playing. He was extremely good-looking, and a great favourite with every one. " I was determined to go through life without enemies," he boasted when an old man, " and I have done so," which was perfectly true. In fact it is on record that " Handsome Jack," as he was called, only lost his temper once, and that when a critic slated him for a bad performance when he was really too ill to act. Bannister marked the gentle- man's features. Bannister was an intimate friend of the younger Colman, who writes of him with a very real affection. He was singularly fortunate in his married life, and when he retired from the stage he had sufficient means to end his days in comfort. " They say it is my wife who has taken care of my money, and made me com- fortable in my old age," he remarked one day, " and so she has. But I think I deserve a little credit, for I let her ! " From his father he inherited a charming voice and genial manners that made everybody like him. He was fond of good living and did not despise the cup, but it was not often that he looked upon the wine when it was red. One night at Stratford-on- Avon, however, the bottle was sent round once too 45 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE often for him, and in his alcoholic joy he insisted upon flinging himself upon the bed upon which Shakespeare was supposed to have been born. His raptures were cut short, however, by the discovery that the bard's couch was occupied by two diminutive children, whom he nearly succeeded in smothering ! I have left to the last lines of this chapter any ac- count of the career of the elder Colman, not that the story of his life is not full of interest, but that, save as regards his management of the Little Theatre, a detailed account of it has no right place among these records and reminiscences. Long before the elder Colman secured the patent of the Haymarket from Foote he was known to theatrical fame as one of the most brilliant dramatic authors of his day, and the intimate friend of David Garrick a friendship which resulted in, and was broken by, " The Clandestine Marriage," a comedy not unknown to the patrons of the Haymarket Theatre in this year of grace. The elder Colman, too, was at one time part proprietor of Covent Garden Theatre, and it may fairly be said that, though his management of the Little Theatre was both creditable and successful, it formed a less interesting part of his life than the twenty years or so that pre- ceded it. This was no doubt largely due to the fact that he was never quite the same man after the fit that seized him in 1771, though he did much excellent work between that year and 1794, when he died. In 1789, just twelve years after he opened as manager of the Little Theatre, he was seized with paralysis, and soon afterwards his mind became affected, until at last it was found necessary to send him to a home at Padding- ton. His death came as a merciful relief, though his loss was keenly felt by his son George, who had fol- lowed so closely in his footsteps that he was able to THE HAYMARKET THEATRE manage his father's affairs most skilfully during the trying period that preceded the elder Colman's death. George Colman the elder was not originally intended for a theatrical career. On the death of his parents, William Pulteney, afterwards Earl of Bath, who always called him by the nickname of " Coley," took charge of him and sent him to Westminster, where he soon showed what clever stuff he was made of by being at the head of the list of those scholars who were sent to Oxford. At the 'Varsity he began to show his taste for the theatre, much to the distress of Lord Bath, who had decided that the Bar was to be his profession. But like so many before and after him, though he ate his dinners and secured freedom for one or two clients, the wig and gown were not his costume. The success of a satire called " Polly Honey combe," produced by Garrick, was too much for him, and he gave up the writing of opinions for plays, with what success all the world knows. This being anything but a serious treatise, I will give no list of his plays nor comment on his wit, his satire, and his faculty of construction. It is enough to say that more than one of his comedies would play as well to-day as they did in those bygone days of the Little Theatre. Colman was the first manager of the Haymarket to form a stock company " to act in all branches of the drama," which, indeed, was a revolution when one thinks of Foote's management, during which " The British Aristophanes " scarcely played anything but his own pieces, and was hardly ever " out of the bill." Tragedy, comedy, burlesque, and what the younger Colman called " fiddle f addle farces," succeeded each other in the programmes, and so well did George Colman cater for the public taste, that he actually played to twenty pounds during the great Riots ! 47 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE . Colman also possessed what I might call a stock dramatist in the person of William O'Keefe, who fitted Edwin and Parsons so excellently with parts, that it would have been difficult to say whether the actors owed more to the author than the author to the players. O'Keefe first came into contact with Colman in 1777 by sending the latter an anonymous play, with the request that " should he disapprove of it he would have it left at the bar of the Grecian coffee-house directed to 'A. B.,' and if he liked it well enough to promise he would bring it out, that he should send an answer as above." The next morning on O'Keefe's arrival at the coffee-house he found a friendly letter from Colman promising to produce his play the follow- ing summer, and making an appointment for the next day. The two soon became intimate friends, and O'Keefe's plays became the plats-du-jour of the Hay- market Theatre. O'Keefe also wrote for Covent Garden and Drury Lane. At the former theatre his opera, " The Banditti," was a failure. " It was cut too much," said a sympathetic friend at Colman's house one day. " Yes," replied Colman, " but who was the cutter ? Not the cutter of Colman Street." O'Keefe had a very sincere affection for Colman pere et fils, and has spoken of them in his reminiscences as being most kind and liberal. The younger he describes as " a true chip of the old block," and that the description fitted him is, I think, proved in the next chapter, which is all his own. Another famous dramatist whom the elder Colman encouraged was Mrs. Inchbald, whose connection with the Haymarket Theatre began with an engagement at the munificent salary of thirty shillings a week. It was not, however, as actress but as dramatist that she was to make her name, and she wrote several THE HAYMARKET THEATRE pieces for the theatre, beginning with " The Mogul Tale," out of which she netted exactly 100. Her first comedy Colman himself named, calling it "I'll tell you what," for want, apparently, of a better title, though he made excellent play with the name in both the prologue and epilogue with which he honoured it. Besides being a clever and very charming lady, Mrs. Inchbald was remarkable for the fact that her beauty and her talents brought her more proposals per annum than most ladies are honoured with in a lifetime. The following, which I found in an old press-cutting book, shows the receipts and expenses during the first year (1777) of the elder Colman's management. The figures are distinctly interesting, and, needless to say, differ considerably from those of the twentieth century. A West-End theatre at 210 a year would be a delight- ful novelty nowadays. I copy the extract just as I found it : From Hay market Books 1777. Whole Rec. of Season ^8975. Foote for his unpublished Pieces six nights performance half a year's annuity . $ 232 800 19 o 6 o Parsons Season .... \ Year's Rent 101 105 o o o For 3 Houses O'Hara author 7 Years Insurance to 1784 IOO 200 29 o o 9 Licence for Theatre at West Sessions . 3136 From this same old book I may, perhaps, be per- mitted to reproduce part of the prologue written by the elder Colman on the opening of his manage- 49 D THE HAYMARKET THEATRE ment on the I5th of May 1777. It was spoken by Palmer : "... While two great warehouses for winter use. Eight months huge Bales of Merchandise produce, Out with the Swallows comes our Summer Bayes To shew his Taffeta and Lutestring Plays ; A choice assortment of light goods prepares, The smallest haberdasher of small wares, In Laputa we're told a grave Projector A mighty schemer, like our new Director Once formed a plan and 'twas a deep one, Sirs, To draw the sunbeams out of cucumbers. So whilst less vent'rous managers retire, Our Salamander thinks to live in Fire. A Playhouse Quidnunc and no Quidnunc's wiser Reading our play-bills in the Advertiser, Cries, ' Hey ! what here ! In the Haymarket a play, To sweat the Publick in the midst of May ? Give me fresh air ! ' Then goes and pouts alone In country lodgings : by the two-mile Stone There sits, and chews the cud of his Disgust, Broil'd in the Sun and blinded by the dust. Now with the napkin underneath the chin, Unbutton'd Cits their Little Feast begin, And plunge full knuckle-deep through thick and thin, Throw down Fish, Flesh, Fowl, Pastry, Custard Jelly, And make a Salmagundy of their belly. * More chian pepper Punch another Rummer, So Cool and Pleasant eating in the summer ! ' To ancient Geographers it was known Mortals could live beneath the Torrid Zone ; But we, who toiling underneath the Line, Must make our Hay now while the weather's fine. Your good old Haymarker, long here employed, The sunshine of your smiles who still enjoyed, The fields which long he mowed will not forsake, Nor quite forego the Scythe, the Fork and Rake, But take the Field, even in the hottest day, And kindly help us to get in our Hay." 50 LISTON AS "MOLL FLAGGON " IN "THE LORD OF THE MANOR" PLATE II CHAPTER V MY excuse for devoting the whole of this chapter to the younger Colman is to be found in the fact that he was most certainly bred, if not born, in the Haymarket Theatre, that his first play was produced there, and that in after years he became first manager on his father's behalf, whose mind had become affected, and afterwards proprietor and manager on his own account. Moreover, quite apart from his long connection with the Haymarket Theatre, George Colman (as I shall hereafter call him) had talent and interest enough in himself to deserve the space allotted to him, the more especially seeing that that space is filled by the pen of one who has humbly followed in his foot- steps more than a century after he first looked after the affairs of the Little Theatre. As for the players that he introduced, I have given up another chapter to them space which they not only demand but deserve, seeing that among those who worked under Colman's management were Charles Mathews, Listen, Elliston, and Young, to mention but the " leading lights." " A chip of the old block " the elder Colman called his son in a prologue to the youth's first dramatic essay, and the expression fitted him like a glove. For " a chip of the old block " he most certainly was in more ways than one. Like his father his original destiny was anything but the stage, and like his father THE HAYMARKET THEATRE early success as a dramatist made the theatre and all that appertained to it his vocation. He followed his father's early footsteps to Westminster and thence to Oxford, and if he was not his counterfeit in form and features, he certainly resembled him closely in char- acter, if one may judge by his own " Random Records " and the other literary souvenirs into which I have dipped. From his father he inherited a remarkable talent for play-writing, and a genius for theatrical management; like him, too, he could drive a good bargain ; and if his readiness to fly into quarrelsome print on the slightest provocation were not hereditary, then I must look again in my dictionary and see what hereditary means. With his father, too, he shared a ready wit, a pen like a razor, a love of good living, a tendency to gout, and a brain that was capable of turn- ing out almost anything in the shape of dramatic literature. That he could write capital autobiography is proved by the account of his own life, which is well worth reading by any one interested in the history of the end of the last century but one. As had to be, with a father like his, George Colman began at a very tender age to mix with those theatrical and literary folk who gathered constantly round the family board. As quite a child he was often in the company of the great Samuel Foote, who always greeted him with the apparently unnecessary admoni- tion, " Blow your nose, child ! " and the famous Dr. Johnson was not unknown to him, though that learned gentleman took about as much interest in small chil- dren as in the care of his own personal appearance. The elder Colman was not a little proud of his boy, and was consequently somewhat piqued when on pre- senting him to Dr. Johnson with " This is my son, Dr. Johnson," the great man knitted his brows in wrath 52 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE and shouted in a voice of thunder, " I see him, sir." But Dr. Johnson has never been accused of good manners. Little Colman was made much of by Gold- smith, and the mighty Garrick initiated him into the sacred mysteries of trap-ball. " He diverted and dazzled me," George Colman says of Roscius, " but he never made me love him." Horace Walpole was another of his earliest acquaintances, so that his entry into the world was literally surrounded by " some- bodies." The elder Colman, in his desire to keep his son from the theatre, was scarcely wise in letting him play more than once in private theatricals after he left Oxford, for he undoubtedly gave young George a taste for the footlights a taste which he afterwards attempted to nip in the bud by despatching him to Aberdeen to com- plete his studies, which George did, while at the same time he wrote his first piece, " The Female Dramatist," which was produced anonymously at a benefit in 1782. It was not, however, till 1784 that George Colman took the bull by the horns aad decided upon a theatrical career, in which his father, realising the irresistible force of heredity, encouraged him by writing a^pro- logue to his son's play, " Two to One." " To-night, as heralds tell, a virgin muse, An unstained youth, a new adventurer, sues ; Green in his one-and-twenty, scarce of age, Takes his first flight, half fledged, upon the stage. Within this little round, the parent bird Hath warbled oft, oft patiently been heard ; And as he strove to raise his eager throat, Your kind applause made music of his note. But now with beating heart and anxious eye, He sees his venturous youngling strive to fly ; Like Daedalus, a father's fears he brings, A father's hopes, and fain would plume his wings." 53 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE So wrote the elder Colman, and the result of the evening was to find young George a successful dramatist with a swollen head. But he was not yet to settle down to a playwright's life. His father had not given up all hopes of keeping him from the theatre, and off the conceited youth was despatched for a month or two to Paris, whence he was to return to be initiated into the mysteries of the law, much to his disgust. Colman pere had yet another reason for getting rid of the boy, for the young gentle- man looked with considerable favour upon a Miss Catherine Morris, one of his father's company, an affection of which the father did not approve. George Colman, however, was not to be put off by any trip to Paris, and he celebrated his entry into legal circles by marrying the fair Miss Morris at Gretna Green. The wedding was kept secret from his father for four years, and in 1784, the elder Colman giving his sanction, George Colman and Miss Morris were publicly and " properly " made man and wife. The year following decided George Colman's future career once and for all. In the autumn his father took a holiday at Margate, where he was seized with a paralytic stroke, which to some extent affected his mind, though he insisted on continuing his old mode of life. But his condition was such that help he had to have, and gradually, without letting his father be aware of the fact, George Colman took a share in the management of the Haymarket Theatre work which was greatly to his taste, and to which, as events proved, he was well adapted. It was not till 1792 that the son had to take over his father's work completely. For two years he occu- pied this fiduciary position, and on the death of the elder Colman in 1794 he bought the theatre, lock, 54 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE stock, and barrel, and set to work to bring it into even greater prominence than it had ever reached before. In 1796 he showed the world that his pen was sharper than a serpent's tooth, for I doubt if there be a more cutting or a bitterer piece of writing extant than George Colman's preface to " The Iron Chest," a piece written by him, and produced at Drury Lane with Kemble in the leading part. Kemble was anything but a success, and the piece was badly received. This so enraged Colman that he rushed to his pen and delivered himself of such a torrent of abuse as I hope no dramatist may ever shower upon my offending head. " The most miserable mummer that ever dis- graced the walls of a theatre would not have been a stronger drawback than Mr. Kemble," Colman wrote. " He was not only dull in himself, but the cause of dulness in others. Like the baleful upas of Java, his pestiferous influence infected all around him." Kemble met Colman in the street a few days after the publica- tion of this terrible document. " You're a sad fellow, George," was all the actor said, shaking his head as he passed on. But it is an old quarrel, and I will rake up no more of it. Kemble was undoubtedly bad in the part, but he did not deserve the epithets bestowed upon him, and one has reason to believe that Colman was some- what ashamed of his handiwork. At any rate, the preface was partially suppressed in later years and the quarrel patched up. Colman's was indeed a curious character. When his old friend O'Keefe was about to publish his dramatic works he refused permission to print five of them, though it was more than fourteen years since any one of them had been produced. Yet a couple of years afterwards he wrote : "I am eager for an opportunity of doing all in my power on your 55 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE account who have done so much on mine," and signed himself, " Ever truly yours." In 1802 Colman, having heard a good deal of Charles Mathews's worth, wrote to him at York and offered him an engagement at the Haymarket, which Mathews accepted, stipulating for a salary of 10 a week. To this Colman agreed, and early in the following year went to York to see his new recruit. Mathews and he soon became fast friends, and Mrs. Mathews was also given an engagement. While at York Colman enjoyed the hospitality of Tate Wilkinson, the manager of the theatre. One even- ing Colman asked his host what play was to be given that night. " The School for Scandal," replied Wilkin- son. " Ah, and what sort of Charles have you ? " inquired Colman, ever on the look-out for new talent. Wilkinson pointed to a gentleman of sixty summers with few teeth and many wrinkles : " Mr. Cummins is the Charles," he replied. Colman gave an unnatural smile, and applied himself to his snuff-box, but not wanting to appear surprised went on to question the manager as to the ladies of the theatre. " You are to play ' Paul and Virginia,' I believe ? Tell me who is to be Virginia ? " Wilkinson this time directed his attention to a matron of whom " fat, fair, and forty " would be a polite description. Colman was fairly staggered. " 'Fore Gad, Mathews," he whispered, " yours is a superannuated company." In 1805 Colman sold a part of the Haymarket Theatre to Mr. Morris (his brother-in-law), Mr. Winston, and a lawyer called Tahourdin. The sale was scarcely effected before two extremely unpleasant " rows " took place in the theatre which had enjoyed peace for so many years. First of all Elliston accused Mathews of not having done his best in a new comedy called 56 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE " The Village," whereupon Mathews retorted that everybody had done as well if not better than Elliston. An unmentionable word from Elliston, and Mathews let out with his right and knocked his brother actor out. The next row took the shape of a riot. Dowton announced for his benefit Foote's " Tailors," which was so much resented by the Snips that they wrote letters to the theatre threatening to break it up. These threats were disregarded, and Dowton duly appeared, only to be greeted with a huge pair of shears, which might well have finished his earthly as well as his ^theatrical career. They missed him, however, and the actor promptly offered 20 reward for the capture of the offender. Then the riot began. The noise attracted the mob outside, and the Bow Street magis- trate was sent for, but his police were not enough for the crowd, and some dragoons from the Horse Guards had to be requisitioned. These soon cleared the mob, and, while they were busy outside, the police went in and took sixteen agitating tailors into custody. With the year 1805 I come to the end of George Colman's life so far as it was connected with the Hay- market Theatre, for the very excellent reason that it would make but tedious reading ; besides, what interest the remaining years contained will be found in the next chapter. The history of the dispute among the partners, the litigation that ensued, the enforced closing of the theatre for an entire season, and the consequent difficulties that arose, I leave to the patient his- torian. They have no place in a random work like this, with no pretentious to detail and no desire other than to amuse. So, without waiting for permission, I take a big leap over fifteen years and land myself in the middle of the year 1820, when Colman, who had retired from theatrical 57 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE management two years before, was given the extra- ordinary appointment of Lieutenant of His Majesty's Guard of Yeomen of the Guard by George the Fourth. The only reason for this appointment that I can find is the fact that Colman was a great favourite with Royalty. But he was far from being a courtier. When the theatrical lieutenant first appeared at Court in full " war paint," the King went up to him and said : " George, your uniform is so well made that I don't see the hooks and eyes." " Sire," replied Colman, unhooking his coat, " here are my eyes, where are yours ? " Another story of George Colman's relations with Royalty not only shows his utter lack of good manners, but is an astounding example of what Royalty would tolerate in those days. Colman was invited to dine at Carlton House, and on meeting the Duke of York the latter ushered him through the apartments . ' ' What capital lodgings," remarked Colman ; " I have nothing like them in the King's Bench." After dinner Colman sipped his wine with great gusto. " Why, this is wine," he said to his Royal neighbour. A little later he turned again to the Duke and asked " Who that fine-looking fellow at the head of the table was." " Hush, George," said the Duke good-naturedly, " or you'll get into a scrape." " No, no," said Colman in a loud voice, " I came out to enjoy myself ; I want to know who that fine, square-shouldered, magnificent- looking, agreeable fellow is at the head of the table." " Be quiet," returned the Duke, " you know it's the Prince." " Why, then," went on Colman again, raising his voice, " he must be your elder brother ; I declare he don't look half your age. Well I remember the time he sung a good song. If he is the same good fellow to-day, he would not refuse an old playfellow." 58 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE The Prince was much amused, and promptly complied with Colman's request, the manager meanwhile ap- plauding uproariously. " What a magnificent voice," he said, when the song was over. " Such expression too ! I'll be damned if I don't engage him for my theatre." Strange to say the Royalties present do not seem to have been the least offended at this extraordinary behaviour. But an excuse for Colman may be found in the probability that he was scarcely sober at the time, for he loved the cup, and suffered time after time from the after effects of his excesses, so that he would often lie in bed more than half the day. " What's the hour?" he asked one day when his servant came to his bed- room to tell him that Theodore Hook had called to see him. " Past three, sir," was the reply. " Damn him," replied Colman ; " does he think I rise with the lark ? Ask him to return at some reasonable hour." One polite mot is recorded in connection with Col- man's Royal encontres. " Why, Colman," the Prince Regent said to him one day, " you are older than I am." " Oh no, Sire," was the answer, " I could not take the liberty of coming into the world before your Royal Highness." Colman was very proud of his witty sayings, and loved nothing better than to pose as a clever con- versationalist, which, indeed, he could be when he chose. He said a very smart thing one night to Lord Erskine, the ex-Chancellor, with whom he was dining. His lordship was boasting of the fact that he had a thousand sheep on his land. " I perceive then," said Colman, " that your lordship has still an eye to the woolsack." 59 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE He was very fond of making jokes in the theatre. One night an actor from Newcastle was being tried in a part, in which he had to say "Ah, where is my honour, now?" He spoke the lines with a fearfully nasal accent. Colman, who was watching at the wings, groaned aloud. " Egad," he muttered, " I wish your honour were back at Newcastle with all my heart." Another extremely bad actor had to say " I shall weep soon, and then I shall be better." "I'm damned if you will," said the enraged Colman, ' even if you cry your eyes out." Colman, though he made plenty of money, was seldom in anything but a more or less embarrassed condition. He loved to pose as being an extremely smart person, and tried to live in the style of people who were worth double his income. He was not a little proud of his appearance, and though by no means a giant, loved to chaff people who happened to be shorter than himself. " Come, Mrs. L.," said Liston one night, as they were preparing to leave Colman's house. " Mrs. Ell, indeed," said Colman, " Mrs. Inch, you mean." In addition to a ready wit Colman had a satirical pen, but Mrs. Inchbald had decidedly the best of him when he entered into wordy warfare with that clever lady about a criticism from her pen of one of his plays. But if Colman were disliked by many people owing to his quarrelsome nature, he seems to have been very popular with the members of the company. Inside the theatre he dropped any swagger that he might assume when he left it. Not only was he often a real friend to many a struggling young actor, but the 60 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE budding playwright of promise could always count upon his help and advice. At the Haymarket he formed a kind of theatrical club, which was known as " The Property Club," owing to its being held at the back of the stage among the scenery and properties. The club began at the end of the second act of what- ever piece was being produced, and went on until the curtain fell. The chair was taken by a different member every night, and several well-known litterateurs often occupied it. Ladies were admitted, and very jolly evenings were spent, but the club was broken up by a lady member of the company of unsavoury reputation who was excluded from its meetings, and took her revenge by writing reports of the club's doings for a newspaper. There were two things that Colman couldn't stand a man who wouldn't laugh uproariously at his jokes, and a successful rival in the play-writing line, even when the rival's piece was produced at his own theatre. " Damn the fellow," he said, when Boaden's " Italian Monk " made a success at the Haymarket, " we shall now be pestered with his plays year after year." Of Sheridan's wit he was fearfully jealous as well he might have been. The worst side of Colman's character came out after he was appointed " Examiner of all Plays, Tragedies, Comedies, Operas, Farces, and Interludes, or any other entertainment of the stage of what denomination soever," though at first he seems to have been a more or less genial censor. Not long after he secured the post, an American actor called Hackett had alterations made in Colman's own comedy, " Who wants a Guinea ? " substituting the character of Solomon Swop for the original Solomon Gundy. The play as a matter of course had to go to the 61 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE Examiner. Colman's letter to Hackett's manager is worth producing. " SIR, In respect to the alterations made by Mr. Hackett (a most appropriate name on the present occasion), were the established play of any dramatist, except myself, so mutilated, I should express to the Lord Chamberlain the grossness and unfairness of the manager who encouraged such a proceeding ; but as the character of Solomon Gundy was originally a part of my own writing, I shall request his Grace to license 'the rubbish,' as you call those which you have sent me. Your obedient servant, &c. GEORGE COLMAN." But this is the only instance I can find of Colman's good-nature as Examiner of Plays. An old friend of his wrote : " His first acts were acts of petty tyranny, and his next those of grasping cupidity," and so they must have been. Though he had been, if anything, inclined to sail as near the wind as possible himself, he became worse than hypercritical when plays were submitted to him for examination. He refused to allow the names of either heaven or hell ; he turned up his eyes in horror at the word " damn," an expletive he was very fond of using ; he refused to allow " O Providence," because he declared the Providence of God was intended ; and he even deleted " demme." He looked not only after the legitimate fees, but he strained the powers of his office to the utmost limit, and demanded a fee. of two guineas apiece on every new song, glee, or even overture sung or played at a benefit performance. One actor was too clever for him, for in order to avoid this hideous exaction he strung together a whole list of songs, recitations, imitations, &c., and sent them to Colman as one piece. They were duly licensed, and the actor saved at least a ten- pound note. Colman even attacked his old friend 62 THE HAYMARKET THEATRE Mathews's entertainment, though most of it was from memory. But Colman failed to get his fee, nor was he successful in an endeavour to squeeze a couple of guineas from every French play performed in London. George Colman died on the I7th of October 1736. The doctor who attended him said it had never fallen to his lot to witness, in the hour of death, " so much serenity of mind, such perfect philosophy, or resigna- tion more complete." He lies buried under the vaults of Kensington Church. CHAPTER VI HAVING at the outset of these records and reminiscences definitely cast aside the historian's cloak, I shall take the privilege of the raconteur and begin this chapter with what should properly come at its end the re- building in 1820 of the Haymarket Theatre, a recon- struction that to all intents and purposes turned it into the handsome structure, externally, over which I have the honour to preside together with my partner to-day. Properly speaking, I suppose this book should have begun just a century later than the year with which I opened, for, as a matter of fact, it was not until 1820 that the Theatre Royal Haymarket, as the British public knows it to-day, became an existing thing. Our present theatre contains neither stone, wood, nor plaster that went to make up the construc- tion of the Little Theatre ; it occupied a different site, though different but a yard or two, I admit ; and is, in a word, an entirely separate thing. Yet, though the Little Theatre and the Theatre Royal Haymarket have no brick and mortar relationship, it is impossible to dissociate them one from another. When the former ceased to be, the latter came quickly into being, and the management merely transferred their power from the dead to the quick. In a word, the essential difference between the Little Theatre and the Theatre Royal Haymarket is to be found in a few feet of valuable London earth, now covered by a restaurant, 64 i; M "3 c* *- 00 r = si II ,a w o 1.1 ~ "3. -o "3 11 .& v e . 5 ~ *ll| a 3-s CO # s f 2 II-