V, z ;' O . "" u. a: 13 ^ o: m u , r ' : tu O i , w en W .' H u c/5 QC DC - U : z D A GUIDE TO THE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF THE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES OF NEW ENGLAND: WITH A BRIEF IIIS^OIW OF THE DENOMINATION. BY JTOHX MITCHELL, PASTOR OF THE EDWARDS CHURCH, NORTHAMPTON. " Beholding your Order and the steadfastness of your Faith in Christ." COL. ii. 5. > K / NORTHAMPTON: PUBLISHED BY J. H. BUTLER. 1838. K? J H i' ' PREFACE. ABOUT three years since, the author publish- ed, at New Haven, a volume on the principles and practice of the Congregational Churches ; which was favorably reviewed by a number of our theological quarterlies, and was generally approved of, it is believed, as a correct exhibi- tion of the subject. He has often been desired to have it re-printed, with a more full discussion of some of its topics, and the introduction of others which he had omitted. The present volume is a partial re-print of that ; and might be published as a revised edition. But so thor- ough has been the revision, and so considerable is the amount of new matter introduced, that it is thought proper to publish it as a new work. A new title has been given it more descriptive of its present design and contents. It is hoped that this volume may be a useful guide to church members and an acceptable auxiliary to pastors. While it is very desirable iarcbe* and congregation! should be well iofetmed respecting the principle* and usages of their own eicellem tyttem, there m not, 00 far as I know, any treatise u pressJy for them, and adapted to popular r. no o Full and particular as to rrpder that tinr pastor* should, amid their man? la- bor*. gite as much mstiuatmn an ts tasira- bl oo the topics here diioeesirf. Some of fbeee topics ate 9 Moreover, of so delicate and personal a nature, that, howerer important they may be, lew pastors %rUI choose to disc ass them .n iheu I do oot suppose that chorch order, which 10 the leading, though not the solo topic of thi* volume, is the moat imports* thing in religion : hoi neither it it the km rtamljr is oot *mimporla*t. Chttrcki iostitoted hy Christ for particular porno* >e edifkatioo of the members, and the e&V propagation of religion in the world i that the snooff cf tter f* flaw, that is, their polity, must bate much to do r adaptednees to tho ends in tt it ran never be otherwise PREFACE. 5 than an important subject to be studied and known. I cannot but think it has been too much neg- lected by us. Our fathers sought truth on this subject with the same conscientiousness and care, as they sought the mind of Christ on other subjects. They sought it at the expense of per- secution and e^ile ; and having, with unwearied pains, found it, they rejoiced in it. It was to them " like unto a treasure hid in a field ; the which, when a man hath found, he hideth, and for joy thereof goeth and selleth all that he hath, and buyeth that field." In that age of ecclesi- astical confusion, and of turning back towards popery, they professed that " they looked upon the discovery and settlement of the Congrega- tional way, as the boon, the gratuity, the largess of divine bounty, which the Lord graciously be- stowed on his people that followed him into the wilderness." But we, their descendants, so far from entering into their studies, are almost con- tent to be ignorant of the very results of them, furnished to our hands. Is it not true that not a few of our ministers do not inform themselves even, much less acquaint their people, thorough- ly, with the principles and grounds of our eccle- siastical system ? And does it not hence arise^ 1* PREFACE. that our people are often too little intelligent in this matter properly to discharge the duties which our system requires of them as members ; and too little established in their views to be not soon unsettled and drawn away to churches of a different order, whose polity they find to be more insisted on, and whose claims they are not qualified to canvass ? Ought we not, as a part of our duty to, our churches, ' and especially when large accessions are made to them of the subjects of our revivals, to instruct them, not only in the doctrines and moral duties of their religion, but in the polity also, under which it is their duty and privilege to act ? Besides the direct practical importance of the subject, it is always desirable that we should be informed respecting it that we may be able properly to appreciate the claims of our own system in comparison with others. And we shall be excused for believing that it is particularly desirable that the true character of our system should be extensively made known at the present time : when large numbers of emigrants from New England, arid their chil- dren, have been ejected from another commun- PREFACE. I ion ; and are reproached for their Congregation- al partialities and habits, as though all the evils in the world had their source in Congregation- alism ; and, as the price of peace, must adopt the entire polity of the church which has ex- scinded them, or else be settled on some other plan. For their sakes, we could wish that they, with all our emigrants to the great West, would consider well the principles of the churches of their fathers.* A knowledge of these principles becomes the more important in view of the place which these churches occupy, and doubtless are destined to occupy, in relation to the great cause of Christ on earth. Tt is not" to be supposed, indeed, that the world is to be converted by means of this or any other single denomination of Christians. But if we consider the history of these church- es, with their numerous arid increasing offspring in the east and in the west if we consider the * Tt is with no unkind feelings, much less with any party feelings, that this allusion is made to the Presbyterian church. We love and honor that church. We pray for her prosperity, and for the healing of her dissentions 5, and can say, with long cherished affection, Peace be within thy walls, and prosperity within thy palaces. 8 PREFACE. way in which God has led them from the be- ginning ; how he planted, and has watered them ; if we consider their principles and spir- it ; their institutions ; their intelligence ; their presses ; their zeal, enlightened, principled, and constant ; and their liberal devotedness to the work of missions and other objects of uni- versal philanthropy ; we cannot but suppose that they are to have a very prominent agency in the renovation of the world. It is therefore important that every member of their commun- ion should be prepared with every sort of in- struction and qualification for the fulfillment of so high a destiny. If this humble volume contribute at all to such a result, if it cause so much as one church, or member, of so important a commun- ion, to be better informed, or more judicious if it cast a little salt into so great a fountain, it will not be valueless, nor the labor of it lost. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. X ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. A knowledge of it important. Early developements of the Congregational plan. The Leyden church. Settlement of New England. The denomination in England. Character of the settlers of New England. State of so- ciety. The first ministers. Discussions of church poli- ty. Platforms. Present character of the New England churches. Page 13 CHAPTER II. PRINCIPLES OF THE CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. Constitution of churches. Members. Church power. Offi- cers. Creeds. Independence and self-government of the churches. Practical results of the System. . 36 CHAPTER III. CHURCH COVENANT AND WATCH. Nature of the Covenant. Mutual watch of members. Ob- ject spirit and manner and importance of the duly. 74 10 CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. Ends of discipline. Means. Private offences our Sa- vior's rule remarks. Public offences specification of them manner of proceeding rules of evidence. For- saking communion. Miscellaneous and general remarks on discipline. Treatment of excommunicated persons. 84 CHAPTER V. CHURCH MEETINGS AND CHURCH BUSINESS. Duty of attending such meetings order to be observed in them. Articles of practice terms of admission and membership pledges. Standing Committees. . 135 CHAPTER VI. RELATIONS OF PASTOR AND PEOPLE. The pastoral office value of a settled ministry. Itiner- ants. Settlement for lifesettlement for a limited time evils of frequent dismissions. Prerogatives of the pas- tornature and measure of his authority his rights in regard to the pulpit* his right of private judgment the freedom of the pulpit invaded by different sorts of per- sons, on account of its influence. Rights of the people in regard to the pulpit. Conventional rights how in- vaded. ' . . . 144 CONTENTS. 11 CHAPTER VII. DEACONS. Origin* qualifications duties manner of introduction in- to office 170 CHAPTER VIII. r RELATIONS OF CHURCH AND SOCIETY PARISH AFFAIRS. Call and settlement of a pastor order of proceeding the contracting parties. Support of the pastor the grounds of that duty inferences. Different modes of providing for parish expenses taxation rent of pews subscrip- tion funds Sabbath collections. Meeting houses and lecture-rooms. Secular use of churches. Parsonages and libraries. Young men. . . . . . 175 CHAPTER IX. RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE OF CHURCHES WITH ONE ANOTHER. Dismission of members from one church to another. Coun- cilsoccasions on which they are called mutual and ex-parte consociations powers of councils. Associa- tions. Discipline of ministers. Church membership of ministers 221 CHAPTER X. DEPORTMENT TOWARDS OTHER DENOMINATIONS. It should be liberal and candid not bound to encourage them to the disparagement of ourselves. Proselytism- .' 12 CONTENTS. its unworthy arts. Joint ownership of meeting houses Union meetings Catholicism. .... 243 CHAPTER XL DOCTRINES AND MEASURES. Doctrinal system of our churches importance of a faithful adherence to it. Measures system of means appointed by Christ importance of relying on that system rather than on human expedients. Lay-preaching. Female speaking in promiscuous assemblies. Hasty admissions to the church. General observance of order. . 261 tt usii PRACTICAL CHURCH MEMBER. CHAPTER I. ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE CONGREGA- TIONAL CHURCHES. IF every man should know something of the history of his own religious commun- ion, it is especially desirable that such a history as that of the founders of the Churches of New England should, by ev- ery means, be kept alive in the minds of their posterity. The character of our Pil- grim Fathers, the causes and objects of their removal hither, the hardships they suffered more for the sake of us their children, than for their own, have a most sacred claim upon our memory. It is a history which every son of New England 2 14 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE should value as his birth-right. " No so- ber New Englander (says Dr. Dwight) can read the history of his country, without rejoicing that God has caused him to spring from the loins of such ancestors, and given him his birth in a country whose public concerns were entrusted to their manage- ment :" and it may be added, that no New Englander who is willingly ignorant of that history is worthy of his origin ; or capable of appreciating, or competent to defend, the inestimable inheritance which has de- scended to him. " I shall count my coun- try lost, (says Cotton Mather) in the loss of the primitive principles, and the primi- tive practices, upon which it was at first established :" that loss, however, will en- sue, and New England will cease to be New England, when her degenerate child- ren, (if that should ever be,) shall be gen- erally ignorant of her history, or cease to revere the memory of her founders. It is not, however, the design, nor is it within the compass, of this volume, to give such a history. A few things only can be v CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 15 noticed, as introductory to the matters which are to follow. The Congregational polity, at least in some of its leading features, began early to be discussed, among the schemes which occupied the Reformers of the sixteenth century ; but did not assume a visible and permanent existence till about 1600. The exiled church at Leyden, under the care of the celebrated Robinson, which after- wards removed to Plymouth, in New Eng- land, is regarded as the mother of the Congregational sisterhood, and its pastor, as the founder, or rather restorer, of the Congregational plan. We of course be- lieve that this scheme of church order is essentially that of the first Christian church- es, and that our Savior and the apostles were its authors. The Leyden church was gathered in England in 1602. Being harrassed by an intolerant establishment, they removed, a few years after, to Holland, and thence, in 1620, to Plymouth ; where the first detach- 16 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE ment of them arrived, in a forlorn condi- tion, in the depth of winter. From the distresses of the sea, which had detained them long upon its bosom, they escaped, at length, to encounter the greater distresses of a houseless forest and an inclement season, distresses, both of sea and land, which only a piety like theirs would have been willing to encounter, and a faith like theirs, been able to sustain. The settlement at Plymouth was the first of the religious colonies which, within a few years after, during the " Laudian persecution," peopled the streams and har- bors of New England. And this was the beginning of Congregationalism in this country. Meantime, a branch of the same vine' was beginning to take root in England. The first church which was gathered there, after Mr. Robinson's, was organized, with simple and affecting solemnities, in 1616. Its pastor was a Mr. Jacob, who during a visit to Leyden had embraced Mr. Robin- son's views. In that unpropitious soil it CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 17 struggled with even greater difficulties, of another kind, than these encountered which were planted in the wilderness. ".It sub- sisted almost by a miracle for above twen- ty-four years, shifting from place to place, to avoid the notice of the public," till, the times changing, it openly appeared in a house of worship in 1640.* From these oppressed beginnings, Congregationalism in England has gone on increasing and flourishing, " as a grain of mustard seed," till it now numbers, in that country and in Wales, above two thousand congregations. Of its numbers in Scotland I am not inform- ed ; but if the eulogy of the celebrated Chalmers, (a Presbyterian) be just, who says of the Scottish Congregationalists, that they are " the purest body of Chris- tians in the united kingdom," it is to be wished that the number were greater than it is, whatever it may be. The state of society in the Naw England settlements, as might be expected from the *Neal. 2* 18 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE causes which originated them, was alto- gether peculiar. It was entirely and emi- nently religious. It might be said of every family, that it was a pious family ; of every adult individual, that he was strictly mor- al, if not religious ; and of every child, that he was piously educated. They were of the best people of England. For it is the best people, the most pious and exempla- ry always, and commonly not the 1-east in- telligent and respectable, that persecution banishes from its communion, while it re- tains the worst. They were the best peo- ple of Jerusalem, " who were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen." They were the best people of France who fled on the revoca- tion of the edict of Nantes. And England had no better people within her bosom than she exiled from it, by the intolerable vexations of her High Commission and other spiritual courts. The immoral and unprincipled people of lax lives and pliant consciences are not the people who either disturb the persecutor, or are disturbed by CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 19 him. When the Rev. Mr. Cotton, the first minister of Boston, a man of excellent learning and piety, and of much repute in England, as he afterwards was in this country, was informed against in the High Commission, and applied to the earl of Dorset for his interest with the primate, the earl sent him word that, " if he had been guilty of drunkenness, uncleanness, or any such lesser fault, he could have got his pardon ; but the sin of puritanism and non-conformity was unpardonable, and there- fore he must fly for his safety." It was for " the sin of puritanism and non-conformi- ty," and for no other " fault," that our fathers were forced to leave. The settlers of New England were all of one persuasion. There was no mixture of emulous and proselyting sects. All the inhabitants of a parish were called by the same bell to the same sanctuary ; all loved and respected the same pastor ; instructed their children in the same schools, and catechisms ; mourned together in the same church-yard : all kept the unity of the 20 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE Spirit in the bond of peace ; being called in one hope of their calling ; having one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all. If they originally brought any diversity of views with them, their common piety, and common trials, and the earnestness and simplicity of their common search for truth, soon matured them into harmony. This happy unity prevailed, without any schism among themselves, or appearance of sects, for several generations^ Nor was this a drowsy and secure state of things. The presence of God was eminently with them. The first age of New England was one of an almost continuous revival. Preach- ing was attended with so much power, in ^some places, " that it was a common inqui- ry by such members of a family as were detained at home on a Sabbath, whether any had been visibly awakened in the house of God that day." " Few Sabbaths did pass without some evidently converted, and some convincing proof of the power CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 21 of God accompanying his word."* Thus the children of the settlers, as they came forward into life, under the faithful care of their parents, and ministers, were gather- ed, by the favor of God, into the same com- munion with themselves. The Spirit of re- vivals has overshadowed these churches from the beginning.f * Prince's Christian History. t There was one considerable period of extensive and alarm- ing 1 declension in the early days of New England. It com- menced, visibly, about 1660 or 1670, i. e. with the third gene- ration. The days of trial had by that time passed away, and prosperity, the greatest of all trials to churches, had succeeded. But even of this period, Mather, the historian, says, that " the people of God in this land were not so far gone in degen- eracy, but that there were further degress of disorder and cor- ruption to be found in other, yea, in all other places where the proteslant religion is professed j and the most impartial ob- servers must have acknowledged, that there was proportiona- bly still more of true religion, and a larger number of the strict- est saints, in this country, than in any other on the face of the earth." MagnaL Book V. In view of this declension there was a special meeting, or synod, called at Boston, to consider a work of reform: and it is remarkable with what fidelity and minuteness this synod went into an inquiry respecting the pre- vailing sins, the result of which they published. A similar reform was engaged in in Connecticut. Many churches set apart seasons for special prayer, faithful inquiry, and solemn renewal of covenant ; and " very remarkable was the blessing 22 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE The first ministers of New England were episcopally ordained, and had been settled pastors previous to their coming hither. " I have before me, (says Neal,) a list of seventy-seven divines who became pastors of sundry churches and Congregations in New England before 1640, all of whom were in orders in the Church of England." They received their ordination, generally, in the time of the mild arch-bishop Abbot, a man of such piety and temper, that had his predecessor, Bancroft, and his succes- sor, Laud, been men of the like views and spirit, New England had not been settled as it was. They received their education at the Universities of Cambridge and Ox- ford, and were all of them respectably, and some of them extensively, if not profound- of God upon the churches which did so." " Many thousands of spectators will testify, that they never saw the special pres- ence of the great God our Savior more notably discovered than in the solemnities of those opportunities." Though there was no general revival during this period, which continued till the great awakening of 1640, there were numerous local ones, as for example in Northampton, where there were five such seasons during the ministry of Mr. Shepard. CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 23 ly, learned. Their excellence, both as preachers and as men, has been abundant- ly testified to by men, not only of their own, but of other persuasions. Two per- sons,* who well knew them, have left, the following account of them. "We that saw the persons, who, from four famous colo- nies assembled in the synod that agreed on our Platform of Church Discipline, cannot forget their excellent character. They were men of great renown in the nation from whence the Laudian persecution ex- iled them : their learning, their holiness, their gravity, struck all men that knew them with admiration. They were Timo- thies in their houses, Chrysostoms in their * Rev. John Higginson, son of the first minister of Salem, and Rev. William Hubbard, minister of Ipswich 5 both born in England. These venerable men ; at an advanced period of their lives, anxious to perpetuate " the old principles of New England," drew up a joint paper, expressly for after genera- tions, which they left behind them, with the following super- scription : " A testimony to the Order of the gospel in the churches of New England : left in the hands of the churches by the two most aged ministers of the. gospel yet surviving in the country." The former died 1708, aged 93 ;, the latter in 1704, 24 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE pulpits, Augustines in their disputations. The prayers, the studies, the humble in- quiries, with which they sought after the mind of God, were as likely to prosper as any means upon earth. And the suffer- ings wherein they were confessors for the name and the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ, add unto the arguments which would persuade us, that our gracious Lord would reward and / honor them, with com- municating much of his truth unto them." There w T as no one subject which en- gaged the attention of the founders of New England more than the subject of church polity. Having escaped from the half re- formed protestantism of their native land, they were deeply anxious to establish a system here according to the true primi- tive model. They were^now in circumstances to do so. The reformation in England had stop- ped short of the reasonable expectations of its most enlightened friends. It was often stationary, often retrograde. It re- CONGREGATIONAL CH tained, at its best estate, too^m^ny of t habiliments, and by far too much of the spirit, of the popish religion which it had professed to supplant. It was retarded by * the habits of the people, which had been formed under Catholic influence. It was involved in numberless controversies. It was entangled with interests of State. It was opposed by the claims ; of arrogant pre- rogative, and repressed by arbitrary pow- er. Freedom of thought was " an heinous crime," and liberty of conscience, " an in- iquity to be punished by the judges." But the New England puritans were now be- yond the action of all these adverse influ- ences. They had come out from among them, and were separate ; and with an ocean intervening, and a wilderness about them, there was no impediment to their free inquiries. In these inquiries the Bible was their guide. The Bible alone. They were not ignorant of history, nor slow to avail them- selves of any light which fathers, councils, or reformers, might shed upon their minds ; 3 26 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE but they regarded the Bible alone as au- thoritative. If alone authoritative, it must ' be sufficient alone ; and the man of God, possessing the Bible, is, in respect to all that is essential to faith or practice, perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. ' So the Puritans believed and acted. They built their system upon the Bible, and thought the foundation broa'd enough. They needed no traditions, or inventions of men, or reasons of State, to make it broader. Deeply feeling their responsibil- ity, to the God of the Bible, to that law and testimony they constantly referred their own and other men's opinions. " The su- preme judge, (say they, in their Platform) by which all controversies in religion are to be determined, and all decrees of coun- cils, opinions of ancient writers, doctrines of men, and private spirits, are to be exam- ined, and in whose sentence we are to rest, can be no other, but the Holy Scrip- ture delivered by the Spirit ; into which Scripture so delivered, our faith is finally resolved." What a world of confusion CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 27 and darkness would have been prevented, had all men been as simple in their appeal to the Scriptures as .were the Puritans of New England ! Besides their numerous tracts and vol- umes on the subject of church order, it was abundantly discussed in sermons, and in other forms. The results of these dis- cussions were embodied, generally, in the Cambridge Platform, which was consider- ed and agreed to by a Synod convened at that place, in 1648, and recommended to the acceptance of the churches.^ This Synod was composed of ministers from all the colonies ; the invitation being general, and the interest a common and important one. They also adopted a confession of faith, namely, the Westminster ; which had then 'lately been set forth. For this the Savoy Confession was afterwards sub- stituted. Having finished their work, in which they had proceeded with great harmony, 66 they did, with an extraordinary elevation of soul and voice, then sing together the 28 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE song of Moses and the Lamb, in the fifteenth chapter of Revelation:" and thus the session was closed. From that time onward, the Cambridge Platform, (till it was superseded in Con- . necticut, in 1708, by the Saybrook Plat- form) was the general directory of the Churches. It did not originate, or essen- tially modify their practice, but rather re- cognized and digested the principles upon which they were already established. It is an instrument the wisdom of which will be more seen, the more it is studied, and compared with the Scriptures. The Saybrook Platform is based upon the same general views as the Cambridge ; differing from it only, or chiefly, in the further provision it makes in respect to councils, and associations of ministers. Such, briefly, is the rise and early histo- ry of the New England Churches. Of oth- er institutions which have had their origin and growth with these churches, 1 can take no notice. CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 29 It is the habit of infidels and vain per- sons, of Catholics, and, I am sorry to add, of some others, from whom better things might be hoped, to disparage the memory of the Pilgrims, with what motives, it need not be mentioned. But the attempt is vain. Their works speak for them. Their schools, their colleges, their laws and governments, to say nothing of their churches, institutions which all men ad- mire, liberties which all men are breathing after, a state of society which, for its intel- ligence and morals, has no parallel in any country, these are their memorials. When our praise of the Pilgrims, or, rather, when our gratitude to God on their behalf, sur- passes the benefits received through them ; when it rises higher, or spreads farther, than the healthful influences which they originated, then shall our gratitude be abated, and our praise restrained. As it regards the Congregational com- munion at the present day, its members still cherish, in- a good degree, the princi- 3* 30 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE pies and habits of their fathers. They are still the enlightened friends of liberty and religion ; the efficient patrons of education ; the advocates, even to a proverb among the licentious, of law, and order, and vir- tuous morals. If in some degree they have declined from the strictness of former times, it may yet be said that they are among the most strict of the existing de- nominations. If, as a body, they keep the Sabbath with less exactness than the fathers did, (a fact to be deplored) it may still be asked, what body of Christian pro- fessors respect it more than they do, or have shown themselves more solicitous to protect it from profanation ? If less se- vere, or strenuous, in their opposition to vice, which of the sister denominations is before them in every work of reform ; or against which has the enmity of the profli- gate been more manifested on this account? I hope we may never be backward to confess our sins, and to lament our degen- eracy. But whatever our sin, or degener- acy, may be, may it never be that of aban- CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 31 doning the principles and habits of our fathers ! We revere the memory of the pilgrims. We revere their principles. We cherish their institutions. We cannot but love the churches of their planting; not merely, or blindly, because of their origin with them, but because of their scriptural simplicity and tried excellence. We hold fast that which is good. We contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints, iden- tical, as we believe, with the faith of these churches ; and for its precious fruits, as developed in their influence. We cannot look at the results of the Congregational system, ecclesiastical and doctrinal, as we behold them in New Eng- land, and elsewhere, without feeling that for us to abandon it, would make us culpa- ble as freemen and philanthropists, as well as degenerate as sons and Christians. If it was an enlightened piety in the fathers which devised the system, must it not be either ignorance or degeneracy in the sons, 32* ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE that discards it ? And though we can ap- preciate and acknowledge whatever is ex- cellent in other communions, yet, after more than two centuries experience of the fruits of this, unaided as it was, and for a long time unmolested, by other systems, and operating alone in forming the charac- ter of New England ; we may, without big- otry we trust, say to such as would prose- lyte us, or our children, to other modes, brought in to rival or supplant the Con- gregational, Show us better fruits, before we forsake the tree which produces these.* And we cannot help demanding, if this * " Let it be recollected, that for nearly a hundred years af- ter the settlement of New England, there were very few of any denomination in the land besides Congregalionalisls. In 1700 ; there were in all the New England states then settled, 900 Episcopalians, [equal to one moderate congregation] of whom 185 were communicants. There were no Methodists ; and with the exception of Rhode Island, very few Baptists. Not-a single church of this denomination existed in Connecticut, and but two or three in Massachusetts. There we're at the same time one hundred and twenty Congregational churches, besides thirty churches composed of Indians. It is plain then that New England is, what it is, chiefly from the influence of the Con- gregationah'sts, and of Congregational principles." Haives's Tribute. CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 33 land were now a wilderness, as it was, and the foundations of our welfare were now about to be laid, who were the men, or what the principles, which were better fit- ted for the work than those we are con- sidering ? And if these principles are any less valuable now than they once were, if they are less scriptural, or less effica- cious, let the system be brought forward, of all the existing systems of faith and or- der, which is more scriptural, and endued with greater efficacy to make men virtuous and happy. " Where is truth, where is piety, where is hope and salvation to be found, if not in these Christian societies, which, for two hundred years, have shared so signally in the protection and care of Almighty God, and which, for the same period, have exerted so happy an influ- ence on all the dearest interests and hopes of this favored community ?"* Or if these principles do not now reside in the Con- gregational communion, if the gold has be- * Hawes. 34 ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE come utterly dim, and the most fine gold changed, let it be shown in what commun- ion they do reside and we will be con- verts to that communion. But if no such church or system can be named, then let the Congregational descendants of the Pil- grims sustain, under God, to the latest times, the faith, and the order, of their Congregational progenitors. Meantime, we repeat the testimony of the venerable men before quoted,* and hand it down to our children. " We do therefore earnestly testify, (say they) that if any who are given to change, do rise up to unhinge the well established churches in this land, it will be the duty and inter- est of the churches to examine whether the men of this trespass are more prayer- ful, more watchful, more zealous, more pa- tient, more heavenly, more universally con- scientious, and harder students, and better scholars, and more willing to be informed and advised, than those great and good * Messrs. Higginson and Hubbard. CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES. 35 men who left unto the churches what they now enjoy. If they be not so, it will be wisdom for the children to forbear pulling down with their own hands the houses of God which were built by their wiser fath- ers, until they have better satisfaction.' 5 And they conclude with their " prayers un- to the Lord for these holy churches, [in. which, who will not unite ?] that he would surely visit them, and grant much of his gracious presence and Spirit in the midst of them ; and raise up, from time to time, those who may be happy instruments of bringing down the hearts of the parents in- to the children. The Lord bless these His churches, and keep them steadfast, both in the faith, and in the order of the gospel, and be with them, as he was with their fathers, and never leave them nor forsake them!" CHAPTER II. PRINCIPLES OF THE CONGREGATIONAL SYS- TEM. As the rights and duties of the church- member are essentially modified by the polity of the church to which he belongs, it is important to him, and also to the church, that he should understand the principles of that polity. The government of a church, like any other government, is a practical thing : it defines relations, dis- tributes powers, prescribes duties. And these vary with the character of the sys- tem. It is therefore obvious, that though all believers, considered simply as disci- ' pies of Christ, have the same duties to dis- charge, yet considered as subject to this or that particular ecclesiastical organization, their duties, as well as their privileges, may be quite diverse. As the active du- ties of the citizen of a republic are not the CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM.. 37 same as those of the passive subject of an oligarchy ; being more numerous, more responsible, more noble : so 3 under the va- rious schemes of church order, there is more or less for the laity to do, or to sub- mit to, in the management of affairs, as the schemes have more or less of the charac- ter of free institutions. The following are the, essential features of the Congregational system. They re- late to the constitution of churches, their members, powers, officers, and relations. A church is a society of believers united together, by their own consent, or cove- nant, in obedience to the will of Christ, for the observance of ordinances, their own edification, and the propagation of the faith. Each society, thus formed, with its proper officers, is to all intents a church. No persons are to be received as mem- bers but such as are hopefully renewed by the Spirit of God, giving credible evidence of the same. Church power, as it is called, that is, the 4 38 PRINCIPLES OF THE power to receive, and discipline members, to elect officers, and to do such other acts as concern the body, in matters of prac- tice, is vested in the church itself, and not in its officers. The latter have their prop- er authority and influence, (as will be no- ticed elsewhere,) but have not power to rule the church, except by consent of the brotherhood. The officers of the church are of two or- ders, namely, presbyters (or ministers) and deacons. They are elected by the breth- ren, and ordained by presbyters. The churches are, in a qualified sense, independent. No church admits the right of any other church, or number of church- es, or church officers, to interfere authorita- tively with its faith or discipline. "They maintain, however, an endeared and ex- tended communion and co-operation with one another ; and are so far mutually sub- ject to discipline, that an erring church is open to the reproofs of others, and, if the case require, may be disowned from the general communion. CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 39 They do not allow the imposition of hu- man creeds, or standards, as tests of ortho- doxy, or terms of communion. The relations of Church and Society, as they have been established by New Eng- land Congregationalists, recognizing both their distinct and their united existence and capacities, are, it is believed, peculiar, and eminently happy. I have merely stated these items, without the grounds or proofs of them. For the elucidation of some of them, I subjoin the following remarks. 1. Churches are, in a limited sense, vol- untary associations ; being formed by the free consent of the members. They can be properly formed in no other way. Men are not born into the church, but into the world: though volumes have been written to the contrary. Nor can any act of pow- er, ecclesiastical, or civil ; or any parish, or diocesan, or other geographical lines, make them members. It must be by their own intelligent act. 40 PRINCIPLES OF THE It is only in this restricted sense, howev- er, that they are of the*nature of voluntary associations ; being in all other important respects dependent, not upon the will of the members, but upon the will of Christ.* 2. Though we have no pufilic Articles of Religion, to which, as a denomination, we require subscription, each church has its own Confession of Faith and Covenant. These Confessions are usually brief and comprehensive, comprising only those arti- cles of the Christian system, which are regarded as fundamental. Their uses are these. They are declarative of the faith of the church j showing in what sense it un- derstands the Scriptures, and what scheme of doctrine it embraces, in distinction from other schemes. They also show the har- * A proper voluntary association is one whose existence and whole economy are a conventional thing. It is self-constituted, prescribes its own laws, admits to membership whom it will, is without responsibility, and may change and modify its form and policy, or cease to be, according to its own pleasure. The churches of Christ ought not in any manner to be confounded with these ; as perhaps they have sometimes been, by those who are fond of calling them " voluntary associations." CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 41 many of the members in respect to faith. The ends for which the members are asso- ciated require that they should be substan- tially agreed in their views ; and this agree- ment is signified by their assent to a com- mon confession. The Covenant is a solemn recognition of the practical duties of the Christian pro- fession. It is an engagement on the part of the members, personally entered into as it respects God, and mutually as it respects themselves, to walk agreeably to the laws of Christ's house. Regarded as forms, also, the Confession and Covenant are important, as giving dis- tinctness and solemnity to the act of a Christian profession. The practice of religious covenanting is very ancient. For covenanting with God, see Gen. 17. Deut. xxix. 10 13. Exod. xix. 8. Neh. ix. 38, (in which instance the covenant was written and sealed?) and other passages. For covenanting with one another, see Neh. x. 2831. 2 Cor. viii. 5.* *See Upham's Rat. Dis. 2931. 4* 42 PRINCIPLES OF THE 3. Congregationalists hold to the local and separate being of churches, as compos- ed of single societies of believers, in oppo- sition to the idea of an extended church, composed of many societies ; as a catholic, a national, or a diocesan church. The New Testament never uses the word church in this extended sense, (except as it speaks of the whole family of the redeem- ed,) but applies it only to local assemblies ; as the church of Ephesus, the church in Smyrna, at Corinth, &c. When it speaks of provinces, or countries, it uses the plu- ral, churches ; as the churches of Galatia, of Macedonia, the seven churches which are in Asia, &c. And this is the Congregational idea. Each society is a church, a whole church, and not a fraction, or constituent part of a church. It is complete in itself, and com- petent to all the acts which it is proper for a church to do. Hence, while we hear of The Church of England, The Presbyterian Church, The Methodist Episcopal Church, meaning extended bodies, -having common CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 43 and imperative articles of subscription, and amenable to some central or common pow- er, we never hear of The Congregational Church, but they are spoken of as churches. Nor do we commonly hear from intelligent Congregationalists such phrases as our Church, our Zion ; or such personifications as her communion, her pale, and the like. Such imposing phrases and ideas, though there may be no great harm in them, per- haps, are as uncongregational as they seem to us unscriptural. In the mouths of some they are unamiably sectarian. The Congregational communion is not one great, imposing, consolidated church ; but a band of related Christian families ; bound together by oneness of faith, affec- tion, and aim ; having the Bible for their common directory, and Christ for their common head. Such were the New Tes- tament churches. 4. That churches should be composed of true believers, and of such only, is es- 44 PRINCIPLES OF THE sential, not only to the purity of churches, but to 'every object for which they exist. Supposing them to be made up indifferent- ly of believers and unbelievers, the child- ren of God and the children of the world, there could be neither fellowship, disci- pline, co-operation, nor visible separate- ness from the world. What fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness, or what communion hath light with dark- ness ? This is clear enough in scripture, and in reason ; but not every church has acted upon it. If churches are to be formed carefully and strictly upon this principle, we may see how wrong it is to invite the entrance of the unconverted, either by urgency, or by too easy admission. How often have churches sought to enlarge themselves by lowering the terms of admission ; by too large or lax a charity, in respect to evi- dence of grace ; by extolling the saving efficacy of their sacraments, and " valid or- dinances ;" or by the too ready embrace of a merely sectarian and proselyting zeal ? CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 45 How often is " the temple of God" sinned against, in these and similar ways ! " But let every man take heed how he buildeth." The apostolic churches were composed of none but those who were hopefully renew- ed, according to the best evidence that could be had of them. They were all ad- dressed as " saints," " saints in Christ," " saints and faithful." Our Savior him- self offered no facilities for the admission of the impenitent, but discouraged them ; as the Bible everywhere does. Ps. 1. 16. Matt. viii. 19, 20. Luke xiv. 2633. Eccles. v. 5. 1 Cor. iii. 10, 12, 13. 5. As the members are required to have fellowship one with another, and as there can be no fellowship with those who are brought together without consent, or like- ness of character, (for how can two walk together except they be agreed ?) it is man- ifestly fit and reasonable that new mem- bers should come in by consent of the brotherhood. Again, as the brethren admit members, 46 PRINCIPLES OF THE so it is for them to expel members, when their conduct requires it. In other words, as it was with them to say whether a per- son was worthy of their fellowship at the first ; it is with them to say whether he continues worthy, or has forfeited their con- fidence. That is ; the power of admission, and of discipline, is properly in the broth- erhood. Suppose it to be elsewhere, and to be exercised independently of them : it may force an unworthy and unwelcome member upon them, but it cannot force their confidence and love. He may be among them, but he is not of them. 6. If the right of admitting and ex- cluding members be important to the broth- erhood, much more is the right of choosing their own ministers. My edification, as de- pendent on my minister ; the love and respect I am required to bear towards him ; my concern for my children and friends, and for all who are to share with me in the influence of his ministrations ; and many other things, make it exceedingly desira- CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 47 ble to me, that I should have a voice in his election. Nor let it be said that the brethren are not qualified for such a trust. Our Sa- vior virtually judges otherwise, where he says, the sheep know the shepherd's voice, and a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him ; for they know not the voice of strangers. True Christians soon discern the spirit of their ministers ; and are made to feel what occasion they have in them either to rejoice, or to mourn. Blind guides may satisfy the blind, but r^ot the "children of the day." " Of such moment is the preservation of this power, [of choosing their officers] that the churches exercised it in the presence of the apostles."* Acts xiv. 23,f and vi. 35. 7. Of church officers we have but two kinds, ministers and deacons, because but * Carab. Plat. f This passage reads in our translation, " they ordained," &c. but the word in the original, means to elect by lifting up the hand. 48 PRINCIPLES OF THE two are recognized in the New Testament. I speak of permanent officers. The apostol- ic office was not a permanent one, but ex- pired with the twelve. The words bishop, elder, pastor, and min- ister, are used in the New Testament to signify the same office, being applied to the same person. Hence the equality of ministers. It was not intended that some should be set up as overseers and lords over the others. " Be not ye called Rab- bi : for one is your Master, even Christ ; and all ye are brethren." " Ye know that they which are accounted to rule over the gentiles exercise lordship over them ; and their great ones exercise authority upon them. But so it shall not be among you." The three grades of bishops, priests, and deacons, are not to be found in the New Testament. The chapter and verse oan- not be named. Of course, as they are not in the Bible, they are not of divine right, whatever may be said of them from history or expediency. JLay-presby t e r s , or ^ruljng^^elders, are > CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 49 V*L<* < Jb ^ mv5r J^ WL CV supposed, bpEceshyterians, to be author- /^ ized by J_Tim. v. 17. " Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of HottEJy'ft*.-^ honor, especially they who labor in word and doctrine." But it is thought by very judicious critics that they have misappre- hended the meaning of the passage. Let the elders (ministers) who rule well, espe- cially those who are laborious in preaching, be counted worthy of double honor. Com- pare with 1 Thess. v. 12, 13, and Heb. xiii. 17. Reference is also made, in sup- port of the office, to Rom. xii. 7, 8, and 1 Cor. xii. 28. These passages speak of ruling, and of helps and governments, but specify nothing as to a government by ruling elders.* The expediency, or lawful- ness, of this method of government, is a separate question, which every one will settle for himself. *" This distinction between teaching and ruling elders, if it ever existed, (which I will neither affirm nor deny,) was cer- tainly not of long continuance; for St. Paul makes it a qualifi- cation requisite in all presbyters, or bishops, that they be able to teach and instruct others. 1 Tun. iii. 2, &c. Mosheim, Bk. I. 5 50 PRINCIPLES OF THE 8. From our having no public Confession of Faith, or general Directory for the wor- ship and discipline of our churches, it is often imagined, and ignorantly alledged against us, by those who think such things essential, that we must necessarily be chargeable with looseness and uncertainty. But our practice in this respect is that of the primitive churches. They had no such Confessions and Directories. We find no instance of our Savior, or the apostles, or prophets, referring to any con- fession, symbol, directory, rubric, or formu- lary whatever, except the Sacred Oracles. Our Confession and Directory are the same. Though each of our churches has its particular Confession, and, commonly, a few simple articles of practice, drawn up for the sake of convenience, they are never appealed to as " standards," or matters of authority. Our standard is the.Bjble. We think we need no other. We think that the Bible contains, in the form of express statute or recorded practice a not only all that is essential to the faith of churches, CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 51 but all that is requisite to order and disci- pline; and that its instructions are suffi- ciently ascertainable without the medium of a human compend. The Bible declares its own authority and sufficiency, and re- quires a direct reference to itself on all questions of a religious or moral nature. 2 Tim. iii. 16, 17. John v. 39. Matt, xxii. 29. Ps. cxix. 105. Prov. vi. 23. Is. viii. 20. If it be supposed, from our having no standards, that w r e have therefore no dis- tinctness or harmony of belief, or practice ; or that our sentiments are uncertain, and not to be known ; the supposition is a very mistaken one. The sentiments of no de- nomination are more widely or distinctly known, gathered, it is true, not from Ar- ticles, numbered and stereotyped ; but from the living pulpit, from lucid and labo- rious authors, and from thousands of tracts and periodicals. And the harmony of our churches has been proverbial. Notwith- standing their perfect and universal free- dom, as to what they shall believe or prac- 52 PRINCIPLES OF THE tice, there has been a remarkable agree- ment both of faith and practice among them, and a prevailing likeness of charac- ter, throughout New England ; and for above two centuries. What churches have dwelt together in greater affection and uni- ty ? In what body of Christians have there been fewer defections from the faith ? And not only here, but wherever the denomina- tion is known. The following testimony of the Congregational Union of England and Wales respecting the denomination in that country, may stand for all. " They wish it to be observed, (they say,) that notwith- standing their jealousy of subscription to Creeds and Articles, and their general dis- approval of the imposition of any human standard, they are far more agreed in their doctrines and practices than any church which enjoins subscription and enforces a human standard of orthodoxy." Whatever may be said of the utility of creeds, we have, in the history of these churches, a practical demonstration that CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 53 they are at least not indispensable, either to the being or well-being of churches. There can be no objection to creeds, that is, to compends of doctrine, for certain pur- poses. They have their uses, and perhaps important uses. But Congregationalists object to their being imposed as tests, or set up as standards, to enforce uniformity. We deprecate the authority they are apt to grow to, to the prejudice of the rights of conscience, and the word of God. As fences against heresy, experience does not prove them to be very effectual. As arti- cles of peace, and bonds of union, we fear they create divisions as often as they pre- vent them. How large a proportion of the internal troubles of churches which use them, their "Acts and Testimonies," their protests and counter-protests, their hot con- tentions, and, in many cases, their violent disruptions, arise from nothing else than zeal for standards ? There are some who think that heaven and earth should pass sooner than one jot or tittle of the exact wording of the prescribed creed and order 5* 5.4 PRINCIPLES OF THE of their church be not fulfilled ; and any brother that offends in one point, they hold to be guilty of all, and obnoxious to ecclesi- astical censure They put their strait-jack- et upon the limbs of Charity, who loves freedom as she loves truth, and make their narrow views the jail-limits Within which she walks afflicted and confined. To those who have looked at history, or at human nature, the conviction is hardly avoidable, that the tendency of creeds, es- pecially when enforced to the letter, is just the other way from that which is claimed for them. As to the entire uniformity which is aimed at by means of them, this is not attainable, as all experience shows. And if the end itself be not attainable, still less is it attainable by the means relied on. The attempt to force an agreement is likely to result in the opposite. Agreement, so far as it is attainable, must be voluntary and unconstrained. The human conscience, made free by its Creator, revolts at the idea of bondage to any human authority. And this reluctance is in none stronger CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 55 than in the truest sons of the gospel ; who have an injunction from their Lord, to call no man their father upon earth ; for one is their Father, which is in heaven, and one is their Master, even Christ ; and an apostol- ic exhortation to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made them free, having reference to this very subject, the imposition of a creed ; namely, that of the Jews, upon the Galatian converts. The tendency of religion itself is, to liberate the conscience from mere human authority, (viewed as such,} and to subject it to God alone. With regard to the Westminster and Sa- voy Confessions, which were formally adopted by the early New England church- es, and are still esteemed by us, as sys- tems of truth, they have never had the au- thority of standards with us, as some have supposed. They originated in England. They were consented to, " for substance of doctrine," by the New England churches, instead of drawing up a confession for themselves, (which they have never done,) 56 PRINCIPLES OF THE for the sake of declaring their doctrinal agreement with Christians on the other side of the water ; from which some had accused them of departing. They were never, to my knowledge, set up as standards, and made of the like au- thority with us, as confessions are with other communions. No candidate for the ministry is required to subscribe them, ex vnimo, or otherwise ; no church adopts them for its private use ; nor is reference ever made to them, so far as I know, in cases of discipline for heresy. They have the authority of truth, with us, so far as they agree with the Bible ; and it is be- lieved, that, regarded as systems, whatever exceptions may be made to some of their particular statements, they are far nearer to " the faithful word," than the loose Ar- minian systems which stand opposed 4 to them. They have no other authority than this. And the same may be said of our Platforms. They are lights which all are free to use, or not, as they please?) CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 57 9. The things which most distinguish the Congregational plan from others, are these jtwo : thalmportance it gives to the suffrages of the brotherhood, in matters of discipline and government ; and^ the inde- pendence of the churches of foreign con- trol, or supervision : which two things may be stated in one, namely, the self-govezn- ment of the churches. In other systems the powers of government are vested in the officers, chiefly in the clergy, exclusive of the brotherhood. In the Congregation- al, they are vested in the church as a body, including its officers ; the latter acting, in their official capacity, as the guides and executives of the church. These powers are vested thus in the church, (1.) Because it was so done in the New Testament Churches, as our references to the Scriptures show. Our Savior himself gives such power to the churches. Matt. xviii. 17, 18.* *To the independence and self-government of the primitive 58 PRINCIPLES OF THE It would seem to be the natural right of the dhurches to govern themselves, un- churches, we have the testimony of Mosheim. " In those primitive times, (says that respected historian,) each Christian church was composed of the people, the presiding officers, and the assistants, or deacons. The highest -authority was in the people, or the whole body of Christians 5 for even the apostles themselves inculcated by their example, that nothing of any moment was to be done or determined on, but with the knowl- edge and consent of the brotherhood. Acts i. 15 : vi. 3 : xv. 4 : xxi. 22." " The assembled people, therefore, elected their own rulers and teachers, or by their authoritative consent re- ceived them, when nominated to them. They also by their suffrages rejected or confirmed the laws, that were proposed by their rulers, in their assemblies 5 they excluded profligate and lapsed brethren, and restored them 5 they decided the con- troversies and disputes that arose, &c." And this order of things the same historian finds to have continued for near two centuries. " During a great part of this [the second] century all the churches continued to be, as at first, independent of each other, or were connected by no consociations or confederations. Each church was a kind of little independent republic, govern- ed by its own laws, which were enacted, or at least sanctioned, by the people." Dr. Murdochs Edition, 1832 ; Vol. I. pp. 81, 82, 86. Mosheim has, of course, no reference in these passages to modern Congregationalism, but has his eye simply upon the primitive churches, and the matters of fact concerning them. There can be no doubt that he has exhibited them as they were, the same being evident from the New Testament itself 5 and the description exactly answers to our Congregational system. CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 59 less this right is denied them in the New Testament ; which is not done, but on the contrary, the right is there confirmed to them. The exercise of this right is also necessary to the due performance of duties which are enjoined upon the body, those namely, of watchfulness and discipline ; which cannot be performed, and, in point of fact, are not performed, at least accord- ing to the intent and letter of them, in churches whose government is aristocratic, as may be noticed hereafter. (3.) The powers in question- are no less safely, than they are scripturally, confided to the brotherhood. It is believed, that the churches, with their pastors, are compe- tent to the maintenance of their own puri- ty, peace, and order, according to the laws of Christ ; and that the powers requisite to this are likely to be used as conscien- tiously and judiciously, and are as little lia- ble-to abuse or neglect, in their hands, as in the hands of church officers alone. Power in the hands of a few, in a hierar- chy particularly, (such is the nature of 60 PRINCIPLES OF THE man) is prone to be consequential and dic- tatorial. It delights in the show and exer- cise of authority, and in the submissive reverence of its subjects ; and too often has its own importance and preservation in view, not less than the interests for which it professes to legislate. I do not aver, that it always assumes this bearing, actu- ally, but such is its tendency, as there is too much melancholy history to show. How many have been the abuses of these forms of government ! How many their neglects ! How often have high church prerogatives and powers lordly in nature, name, and exercise ; and aspired to by im- proper men, if they have not spoiled the simplicity of good men been exerted in ways immensely injurious to religion, im- mensely foreign to its nature and interests as a spiritual thing, and oppressive and distressing to the most conscientious of its subjects ; and how often, also, have they been negligent and indifferent where cor- ruption and disorders, doctrinal and moral, have demanded their exercise ! CONGREGATIONAL. SYSTEM. 61 The government of the churches vested in themselves, is a very different thing from a government solely by officers. From its nature here, it is incapable of os- tentation or aggrandizement, or of far- reaching abuses. Its exercise, in the hands of the brotherhood, is the humble discharge of duties where all are alike responsible and alike concerned in the consequences ; where the power of each, if any be disposed to use it improperly, is balanced by the equal voice and vote of the others ; and where, in cases of censure, particularly, each is reminded to do what he does, " in the spirit of meekness ; con- sidering himself, lest he also be tempted." There may be in a reverend assembly of divines, or house of bishops, or other form- al legislative or judicial body, more learn- ing and gravity, but there is not always more simplicity and prayerfulness, than in the humble church meeting; whose very want of the consequence which learning and office give, makes them the more self- distrustful and circumspect, in what they 6 62 PRINCIPLES OF THE do, and the more disposed, in their lack of wisdom, to ask of God, who giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not. (4.) The discipline of the church is a dif- ferent thing in the hands of ^the church, from what it is in merely official hands. -It is another and a better thing. In the first place, we want the aid of the brotherhood in our endeavors to reclaim offenders. A member will often deal with a fellow member, a plain man with a plain man more hopefully than a bishop, or any other church officer can. They are better acquainted, and understand each other better ; and have more that is com- mon between them, of language and sym-* pathy. This is precisely the means which Christ has appointed in his rule, in the xviiith of Matthew. He does not direct the pastor, rector, or session, to take the offender in hand, immediately ; but a broth- er is to deal with him, in the first instance alone ; then with one or two others ; and then the church as a body. At the same time, the pastor may use his influence in CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 63 addition to theirs. The benefit of this method is such, and so^ obvious, that I think that those who know what it is by experience will not willingly exchange it for others. Again, the censures of the church are more effectual, proceeding from the broth- erhood. They are another thing in their nature, and another thing in their efficacy. A censure proceeding from the authority of a church officer, or church judicatory, is an official act, and is felt to be no more than this by the subject of it : but proceed- ing from the brotherhood, the equals and associates of the offender, it has the nature of public opinion, and falls 3 as such, with peculiar force upon his spirit. It is so felt by him, and by the church ; it is so regard- ed by "them that are without;" and I doubt not that such it was intended to be, by him who instituted the discipline. c But ye brethren, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be asham- ed.' The shame arises from his having forfeited the Christian esteem, and conse- 64 PRINCIPLES OF THE quently the fellowship, of the society which had received him. He is disowned stricken from their list. It is evidently the design of our Savior, in the result to which he brings us, in his rule, and of much else that is said on discipline, in the New Tes- tament, to place the offender, not under the simple ban of official authority, but, which is much more painful and subduing, in the strong light of an unfavorable opinion, expressed by the voice of the so- ciety towards him, " as an heathen man and a publican," and one not to be com- panied with as a Christian. And so, on the other hand, if the delinquent be restor- ed, it is the same popular voice, or opinion, that restores him. It is that which alone can restore him, in reality ; for the good opinion of the society is that to which he is to be restored, and not merely to a "name to live." An act of power may re- store him to his place in form merely, but cannot restore him to confidence and es- teem: without which his restoration is a nullity. CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 65 This, then, is the peculiar efficacy of the Congregational method of discipline. It lies in the expressed opinion of the broth- erhood. It lies there, I mean, so far as its efficacy is derived at all from men. Of course the offender is to be sensible that he has broken the laws of Christ, and done dishonor to religion ; and from that source chiefly his compunctions should arise. And how much is discipline worth where such is not its efficacy ? How much is it ever worth, as to its moral effect, if it do not come to this, if it be not sustained by the voice of the church as a body ? How much effect will the bare decision of a judge, or a bench of judges, have upon the mind of a citizen, so long as he is sus- tained under it by the popular voice and sympathy ? And how much salutary mor- al effect did all the pompous solemnities, mulcts, imprisonments, penances, or anath- emas, ever have, that have proceeded merely from mitred authority, and commis- sioned power, independently of the voice of the people ? 6* 66 PRINCIPLES OF THE If the efficacy of discipline, must, after all, then, depend on the opinion of the brotherhood, why not come to that directly, and surely, as we do in our Congregational way ? The Congregational system " ar- rives by a direct road, at the point which other modes, [if they reach it at all J reach circuitously, and by implication. It speaks the voice of the church, and always speaks as the church thinks. It is an expression of the sentiments and convictions of the whole body. As such, it has a force in honoring Christ's laws, and in rousing the conscience of an offender, which other modes have vainly essayed to obtain by imposing forms, solemn warnings, and dreadful denunciations."* The independence of the churches is a necessary part of their self-government. Their powers become a nullity if they re- sign themselves to a superior jurisdiction. If they are not competent to determine ul- *Ch. Sped. 1831. CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 67 timately for themselves, if their doings either want confirming, or are liable to re- versal, by a higher power, they are virtu- ally void. Our Savior himself gives this ultimate power to the church, Matt, xviii. 17, 18. He does not say, If the offending member neglect to hear the church, let the case be carried up to some higher tribunal ; but the case is to be terminated there. And while this ultimate power of deci- ding, in cases of discipline particularly, is important to the fellowship of the mem- bers, (for how can they have fellowship with a member whom they are forced to retain against their consent ?) we are per- suaded that cases generally can be deter- mined better by the church, than by any other tribunal. The church where the case arises is best acquainted with the facts and parties ; and it is not difficult to conceive, that acting under a solemn sense of their responsibility as the ultimate judges, they will act more cautiously and judiciously, than if acting under the im- 68 PRINCIPLES OF THE pression, that if they commit an error, there is another tribunal to revise and cor- rect their doings. And in addition to this, there is an advantage in the comparative privacy and dispatch which are secured by this method. A matter is settled sooner, and with less publicity, when it is settled within the church, than when it is carried abroad, by one remove and another. It cannot be carried abroad thus, without ex- tending, more or less, its agitating effects, and its unpleasant notoriety. Settled at home, it is comparatively hidden and con- fined. Settled in a public judicatory, it is heard in its discussions, and reported on its journals ; so that that which was done in a corner is proclaimed upon the house- tops. Why not apply our Savior's rule to churches, as well as to members, and let their private difficulties be settled in pri- vate, as far as they may ? I do not mean that cases should never be carried beyond the church in which they originate : but it should be done for advice, rather than adjudication ; and the CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 69 more seldom it is done the better. It may look well in theory to provide for a succes- ion of appeals, it may look like a scrupij- lous regard to justice, but I cannot help thinking it an evil in fact. We know how it is in civil litigation. The parties, be- cause they may, are disposed to carry their causes from one bench up to another, till they come to the last ; and will never be satisfied that justice is done them, so long as there is a higher court to review the de- cisions of the lower ; nor are satisfied then, any better than at the first, if they are sat- isfied as well ; while the community at large, from seeing the case so long and successively debated, are not unlikely to be impressed with a belief that the case is complicated, and justic,e doubtful. The early Congregationalists of New England were very tenacious of the self- government of the churches ; as their des- cendants, generally, and those of England, are now. I will not enlarge on the sub- ject farther than to observe, that the wis- dom of our fathers in this particular, as in 70 PRINCIPLES OF THE many others, receives increasing confirma- tion from year to year. It is more and more a matter of experience, that church difficulties are soonest and most satisfacto- rily healed by the churches themselves ; and that when it is necessary to go to a council, persuasion is better than authority : that is, an advisory council, which is the Congregational mode, is better than an ec- clesiastical judicatory, or other law-dis- pensing power.* Finally ; It is no small argument in fa- vor of this whole system of polity, that it is eminently adapted to make practical men. Though the position b.e admitted, which *If this "be so, the question naturally arises, Have the sons of New England been doing- well, in neglecting, as they have, the approved wisdom of their fathers, in rearing up so many churches, in new settlements, on another plan than theirs ? If they deemed the Congregational plan worth all .that it cost them, is it not worth preserving and extending by us, among th'eir emigrant descendants in the West and South ? Its fruits here are confessed to be excellent : is it not worth as much there as here? Would not its fruits be as valuable upon the lakes and streams of the West, as they are upon the shores and rivers of the East ? Will not the vine bear transplanting CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 71 has been so commonly admitted in eccle- siastical controversies, that there is no pre- scribed form of church f order in the New Testament, still there is a principle which, plainly, ought to guide us in the framing of our systems ; which is this. The ends of church order must be the same as the ends of truth itself. It must have been the di- vine intention that they should conspire to- gether to one result ; the latter as ancillary to the former. Whatever the system be, therefore, which we adopt, it should be such as to concur with and promote those ends of truth ; and that is the best system which does this most effectually : so that from the comparatively barren soil of New England, to the rich tfoltoms of the great Valley ? It is computed that 400 churches, or more, have been gath- ered in the west for the Presbyterian church by the benevolence of Connecticut alone. The men and means were furnished here, and sent out chiefly by the Connecticut Missionary Socie- ty. And I have seen it stated, by high Presbyterian authority, that not less than fifteen hundred of their churches are essen- tially Congregational in their origin and habits. A high com- pliment both to the zeal and liberality of New England men. Add these 1500 churches which are Congregational in spirit to those which are such in form, and there is not in the world a more intelligent, efficient, and pious body of Christians. 72 PRINCIPLES OF THE admitting that the New Testament does prescribe no order, it does not follow from this, that it is a matter of indifference what our order is, and that we have unqualified liberty to devise what system we will.* What then are the ends of religious truth ? They are, .first, to, make men pious; secondly, to make them Jtsqful* First, pie- t}fr- then activity, (or zeal?) directed by knowledge, in the cause of Christ. That is, the ends of truth are, in a word, to make practical Christians. And this the Congregational system em- inently does. While other systems ex- clude the laity from ecclesiastical affairs, altogether, or in a great degree, regarding them only as worshippers and tax-payers, the Congregational churches devolve upon their members the responsible duties of discipline and government. They are * Without either disputing or admitting 1 this position, I can- not help observing that the New Testament does at least give us precedents. The New Testament churches certainly had some order ; and what that order was, it is not difficult to see. Whether the form assumed by them was designed to be always obligatory or not, we leave every one to determine for himself. CONGREGATIONAL SYSTEM. 73 thus called habitually to act together. Their wisdom and piety are habitually put in exercise ; and by this means are neces- sarily increased. Each church is a school of mutual instruction in the great princi- ples and precepts of the gospel ; where the younger are benefitted by the expe- rience of the older, and all by the collected wisdom of the body, and by that of the pastor, their common guide. And the re- sult is strikingly obvious, in the known practical character of this body of Chris- tians. Look at their movements in all the practical concerns of religious and social life. Look at their colleges, and schools, and other institutions, designed and sus- tained by them, for the good of the world. Look at their efficiency in missionary ope- rations, and in all movements of reform. They are not merely devout worshipers within church walls, and decent people without ; but, notoriously and eminently, they are intelligent, liberal, and efficient business Christians. They serve God, as well as worship Him. 7 CHAPTER III. CHURCH COVENANT AND WATCH. HAVING looked at the principles of these churches, we proceed to their practice. On becoming members of the church, besides professing our faith, we enter into a covenant. This covenant is, first, with God ; and embraces the duties of piety to- wards him : .gep.on.cUy, with the members ; with whom we engage to live in Christian affection and harmony ; to walk with them in a due observance of ordinances ; to watch over them in faithfulness and love, expecting the same from them ; to support the discipline of the church, and to submit to the same ; and, in general, to observe and do all which the interests of the body, and of the members, may justly require CHURCH COVENANT. 75 of us, and to refrain from all which may reasonably grieve or injure them. To love the brethren, next to the love of God, is first among these duties. Love is the soul of all. But I pass over whatev- er pertains to the religion of the affections, and confine myself, according to my de- sign, to the practical concerns of the reli- gious social state. The first which I shall mention is, the MUTUAL WATCH OF THE MEMBERS. We covenant together to watch over each other's infirmities and errors ; to ob- serve each other with the eye of Christian affection and concern, and to give and re- ceive reproof, as occasion may require. Any member knowing of any thing in another, which is inconsistent with his character or hopes as a Christian, whether it be some impropriety of behavior, error of faith, or neglect of duty, is bound to no- tice it in a way of friendly admonition ; or to take such other measures as he may 76 CHURCH COVENANT conceive to be best suited to his amend- ment. " Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual restore such an one." "Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him ; and if he repent, forgive him. 33 This was a law of the Jewish church, as well as of the Christian. " Thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbor, and not suffer sin upon him."* Positive faults are the first objects of this duty ; but besides these, we are bound to notice the danger a brother may be in, of committing a fault. If we see him exposed to fall, heedless of the pit that is before him, or parleying with the enemy, we do wrong to wait till he actually falls, before we admonish him. There are those who through their peculiar weaknesses or temp- tations, are ready to fall, and that daily, into " the sin which doth so easily beset" them, and need our kind preventive vigi- lance. Insensible of the approach of temp- * Gal. vi. 1 5 Luke xvii. 3 5 Levit. xix. 17. AND WATCH. 77 tation, or too weak to resist it, how kind then, how salutary, the faithful voice of the brother, who, true to the trust which he has assumed and given, comes once and often, as the case may require, to waken, strengthen, and recall them ! It was such a duty as this, that Jesus enjoin- ed on Peter : And when thou art converted, that is, after thy fall and recovery, in the matter of denying Christ, strengthen thy brethren. The same is enjoined on all. " Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ." " Looking dili- gently lest any man fail of the grace of God ; lest any root of bitterness, springing up trouble you, and thereby many be de- filed ; lest there be any fornicator, or pro- fane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright."* I think, too, that that general state of coldness, or declension in religious feeling, into which all are too apt to fall, is within the province of this duty. If we see some * Luke xxii. 32 j Gal. vi. 2 5 Heb. xii. 15, 16. 7* 78 CHURCH COVENANT " waxing cold ;" falling off from the accus- tomed prayer meeting ; no more speaking out of the abundance of the heart, of the things of the kingdom ; " sunk down with sleep ;" it is incumbent on us, I do not say to rebuke them, but affectionately to " stir them up by putting them in remembrance." " But ye, brethren, (should we say to these drowsy ones,) are the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night nor of darkness. Therefore, let us not sleep, as do others ; but let us watch and be sober. For they that sleep, sleep in the night ; and they that be drunk- en, are drunken in the night. But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breast-plate of love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation. For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salva- tion by our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him."* I Thess. v. 410. AND WATCH. 79 The spirit and manner in which this duty should be performed, should be always kind and brotherly, as far as possible from harshness and reproach. There is no occasion for reproof being otherwise than both kindly given and kindly recei- ved ; for it is in reality a kindly act. We should be faithful in this duty ; but at the same time it will be well to remem- ber, that a merely meddlesome, or fault- finding habit, is no part of the proper per- formance of it. There will be serious oc- casions enough to require our faithfulness, without our seeking them in the lawful affairs of our neighbors, or in those mere infirmities which are common to men. 1 need not remark that it is as much our duty to receive reproof ,as to give it. He who resents and rejects reproof, when justly and kindly given, violates his covenant, and wrongs his brother. "Confess your faults one to another, and pray for one another, that ye may be healed." 80 CHURCH COVENANT This mutual watch of the brotherhood is of much importance. It is one of the ex- cellent benefits of church union ; and is valued as such by every truly spiritual member. " Let the righteous smite me ; it shall be a kindness : and let him reprove me ; it shall be an excellent oil, which shall not break my head." " Faithful are the wounds of a friend." The faithful performance of this duty has no tendency to promote disgusts and alienations, as some may imagine ; but on the contrary, as it is one of the best proofs of love and confidence in brethren, so it tends to produce and confirm those af- fections. It was ever a characteristic of the best men, that they were faithful reprovers. Such were the prophets and apostles, and such, above all, was our Savior. On the other hand, the most wicked men are ever indifferent to the sins of others. They say it is not their business to look after their neighbors ; and they demand, with Cain, " Am I my brother's keeper ?" AND WATCH. 81 It is one of the important effects of this mutual watch of the members, that it is a great preventive of church discipline. Most of the grosser sins committed by members, are preceded by lesser, but obvious depart- ures from the ways of God ; and if the un- happy wanderer had been affectionately admonished at the first stages of his delin- quency, take the intemperate for exam- ple, it might have saved not only him from a grievous fall, but the church itself from the dishonor and grief of a case of discipline. There is more hope of reclaiming a bro- ther at the first stages of his sin, than when it is aggravated. He has then more character and conscience, and less infirmi- ty and blindness ; and the private labors of his brethren, which then are proper, are more winning, probably, than the open and formidable dealing which afterwards is ne- cessary. Let alone till the church takes up his case, he is not unlikely to regard its formal procedure as an organized persecu- 82 CHURCH COVENANT tion, a regular setting to work to effect his disgrace ; which is a state of mind in the last degree unfavorable to his reformation. The case, at first curable, is become des- perate before it is meddled with ; and is so regarded, probably, both by the church and by him. Taken up late and reluctantly by the former, it is resisted, or sullenly submit- ted to, by the latter ; and ends as both an- ticipate. Our discipline, in too many instances, begins too late ! too late for the claims of duty, and too late for the ends of discipline. The pledge of the members to watch over the offender has been culpably neglected ; and this neglect, though it be no justifica- tion, or, perhaps, mitigation, of his sin, be- longs to its history, and makes them acces- sory to a brother's ruin. To conclude ; I cannot but think that this duty of watchfulness and reproof, so necessary, so naturally unpleasant to dis- charge, so much neglected, is peculiarly AND WATCH. 83 pleasing to God, and that it will be pecu- liarly rewarded. "Now we exhort you, brethren, warn them that are unruly, com- fort the feeble-minded, support the weak, be patient toward all ;" and remember that you are bound to this, by Christ's com- mand, and by your solemn covenant. CHAPTER IV. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. THE ends of discipline in the church are, 1. The reclaiming of such as fall into sin. " Restore such an one." " That the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus." Gal. vi. 1. 1 Cor. v. 5. 2. The preventing of sin in others. "Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear." 1 Tim. v. 20. 3. The purity of the church. "Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump ?" " Purge out, therefore, the old leaven,' that ye may be a new lump, as ye are [profess to be] unleavened ;" that is, cast out iniquity, that ye may be a pure society, as ye profess to be. " For the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are." 1 Cor. v. 6, 7; and iii. 17. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 85 4. The character of the church and the /honor of religion in the view of the world. v ^ Ye are the salt of the earth : but if the salt have lost its savor, wherewith shall it be salted ? it is thenceforth good for noth- ing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men." Matt. v. 13. 5. The preventing the divine displeas- ure. " For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged." 1 Cor. xi. 2932. These ends of discipline show its impor- tance. But of this I shall speak hereafter. The means of discipline are private per- suasion and reproof, admonition before the church, suspension, and exclusion from its communion. No other pains or penalties whatever, such as fines, penances, impre- cations, (such as the Catholics use) and the like, are allowable. The New Testa- ment knows nothing of them. The disci- pline it inculcates is wholly of a corrective and moral kind, and not punitive. 86 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. Cases requiring discipline are commonly mentioned under two classes ; namely, private offences, and public offences. PRIVATE OFFENCES. Private offences are those which are of a strictly private nature, committed by one member against another ; and which, be- iing not known to the world, or not public- ly scandalous, may be settled in a private way. The rule respecting this kind of offences is thus laid down by Christ. "If thy brother trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone : if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take w r ith thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses, every word may be established. And if he shall n.eglect to hear them, tell it unto the church : but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. Verily I say CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 87 unto you, whatsoever ye shall bind on earth, shall be bound in heaven ; and what- soever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." Matt, xviii. 15 18. This rule is so plain that it scarcely needs comment. There are three steps to be taken ; each successive one being ne- cessary only in case of the failure of the preceding one. If a fellow member has injured you, your first duty is to go and tell him his fault in private, and endeavor, in Christian sin- cerity and faithfulness, to bring him to a just sense and acknowledgement of it. Tell him his fault. Not that you are in no case to mention it to others. This may be necessary for inquiry, or advice. But to make it a matter of your open talk, or cen- sure, is contrary to the precept, and tends to embarrass and defeat the interview. If he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother ; you have recovered him from his error*; and have attached him to yourself, more strongly, perhaps, than he was be- fore ; for these scenes of ingenuous ac- 88 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. knowledgement and forgiveness between brethren, have an effect mutually to reveal character, inspire confidence, and cement affection. If he acknowledge his fault and is sorry for it, the matter is ended. You are thenceforth to remember it only to love him the more fo: the ingenuous Christian feeling which prevailed with him, (so con- trary to human nature,) to confess and re- gret his error ; and to quicken the feeling of your own infirmities and sins, which daily need the forgiveness of your heaven- ly Father, if not also of your fellow men. Let there be no unchristian harshness, triumph, or contempt, at the time of the interview, nor coldness afterwards. Thou hast gained thy brother : let that suffice. But if he refuse to listen to you, you are then to take the second step. " Then take with thee one or two more, fyc." Let the brethren chosen for this purpose, be of good judgment, of acknowledged piety, and not reasonably objectionable to the offend- ing brother. If their endeavors joined with yours prove unsuccessful, it then re- CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 89 mains to tell it to the church. This done, your duty is discharged.* Being brought before the church, it be- comes its duty, in the presence of the par- ties, with all patience and candor, to hear and judge the case. If the accused be found truly charged with the fault, and still refuse satisfaction, it will be the duty of the church, after due means used, to exclude him from its communion : Let him be as an heathen man and a publican ; and our Savior declares, (verse 18,) that heaven will confirm its decision. As to the manner of conducting the trial before the church, it is commonly done by a committee. In some churches the complaining brother is expected to do it in person. But this exhibits him in the unamiable light of a party and an accuser. * It is worthy of remark that the word translated tell, in the 15th verse, means convince, slty^ov : go, convince thy brother, argue the matter with him. But in the other instance, verse 17, it means simply to relate or tell } smt : report the simple matter of fact to the church. 8* 90 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. I must dismiss this class of offences with two or three remarks. 1. With regard to the offence. It must be a real and serious fault, and not an im- aginary one. Things of ordinary occur- rence, and such as result from the common imperfection of our nature, ought not to in- terrupt the fellowship of brethren, much less, to occupy the church. 2. With regard to the offending member, let it be observed that his refusing to give satisfaction is a new and distinct offence at each step of the process ; and especially the last, compared with which, the origi- nal offence may be a thing of minor impor- tance. The original fault was an injury, and perhaps not a very grievous one, to a private individual. But his subsequent conduct with regard to it, is a settled dis- regard of private justice, the voice of the church, and the authority of Christ. Nor let it be said that he is excommunicated for that private offence alone. It is for the CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 91 whole proceeding ; and especially for his last act, in obstinately refusing to hear the church. It is his neglecting to "hear the church," more, apparently, than for his private offence, that our Savior requires his excommunication. For by this last act of perverseness, this pertinacious, if not contemptuous, disregard of the sentiments and Christian endeavors of the brotherhood, he shows himself no longer worthy, nor indeed capable, of their communion. If the offending member refuse to appear before the church, being duly notified, he of course refuses to hear the church, and the church must proceed accordingly. It may be also observed here, that the offender ought to forestall this whole pro- cess, by going of himself to the injured party. Matt. v. 23, 24. 3. With regard to the member aggrieved, it should be remembered that his duty is explicit and imperative. He is not at liber- ty to neglect the course prescribed, nor to substitute some other ; but is bound to take 92 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. the precise steps, and all of them, should it be necessary, which the rule requires. You may say, if your brother has injured you, it is his duty to come to you and ac- knowledge it. And this is true ; it is his duty ; but if he does not do so, it is yours to go to him. You may choose rather to put up with the injury, or pass it over, than be at the trouble of such a process. But your of- fending brother is concerned in the thing, as well as you, and more than you ; for it is a greater calamity to have done the wrong, than to have suffered it : and though you may be willing to bear the in- jury in silence, you may not suffer the sin upon him. He has done a thing which he ought to repent of ; and must repent of, to be forgiven of God. Not only his charac- ter as a Christian, but his 'hopes as a Chris- tian, demand this of him. And you are the person best fitted by the circumstan- ces, as being concerned in the injury, and specially required by Christ, to endeavor to bring him to such repentance. You CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 93 owe this to him. You owe it to the church ; the sins of whose members you are not at liberty to be indifferent to in any case, and particularly in this. And you owe it to yourself; for your feelings can hardly be right to sit down with this brother, nor his towards you, probably, till the fault is ac- knowledged, and confidence restored. 4. The duty of the church is likewise ex- plicit and imperative. It is bound to re- ceive the complaint when regularly brought before it, and to dispose of it according to the will of Christ. Such is our Savior's rule. And let us observe how strictly in this, as in other things, the Congregational system has con- formed itself to the scriptures. There are systems of church order which are incom- patible with this rule. A private member, under those schemes, may, if he choose, (but it is not, I believe, expected of him,) take the first and second steps ; but what then ? Shall he " tell it to the church ?" 94 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. But the church has no cognizance of the matter. The power to discipline is not in the church, but in the hands of the clergy alone ; or, in some cases, of the clergy and subordinate officers. He may tell it to the rector ; or to " the preacher in charge," if he will ; but these are not the church ; and this is not the rule. Besides, if the church should be destitute of a minister, as often happens, what then ? The process stops, (supposing it to have been commenced ;) a thing which can never occur under the Congregational system ; because the church, though destitute of a minister, is still com- petent to discipline ; though the presence and aid of a pastor is very desirable. Is it said that the rector, or preacher, is the representative of the church ; or that he acts for the church, and in its name and behalf? The answer does not satisfy us. He is not the church ; nor is the dis- cipline proceeding from his authority the same thing, either to the subject of it, or to the church, as when it expresses the voice of the brotherhood. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 95 Where the scriptures have laid a duty directly upon a private member, or upon the church as a body, it does not satisfy the scriptures, that another person, or number of persons, should undertake that duty for him, or them. Take, for exam- ple, those passages where the church as a body, the brethren, in so many words, are charged with the business of discipline ; as 1 Cor. v. 47, 13; 2 Thess. iii. 6. It is plain enough that the preacher, or rec- tor of the church, cannot discharge the du- ty, and exonerate the church; inasmuch as he cannot be " gathered together" for the church ; nor fulfill the injunctions, " Put away from among yourselves that wicked person ;" " Brethren, withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly." They only upon whom the duty is imposed are competent to dis- charge it. By what authority then has this express and salutary rule of Christ been laid aside ? How comes it to have been formally laid out of the schemes in question ; and to be 96 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. still disused and made a dead letter to large portions of the church of Christ ? Where is the " apostolic commission" to construct systems of church order in such a shape as to abrogate, or modify, this more than apostolic law of Christ himself? OFFENCES OF A PUBLIC NATURE. The following are specified in the New Testament, as requiring the discipline of the church. 1. Scandalous vices, or immoralities. " But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother, be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner, ' with such an one, no not to ea t." " Put away from among yourselves that wicked person." 1 Cor. v. 11, 13. These are a specimen of such offences. The list may be enlarged from such passa- ges as 1 Cor. vi. 10 ; 2 Tim. iii. 2 5, and others. All open immoralities belong to the catalogue. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 97 The denying of the essential truths Qr the embracing essential errors. " Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than that we have preached, let him be accursed." "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not," &c. Gal. i. 8 ; 2 John 10, 11. Al- so, 1 Tim. vi. 35 ; 2 Tim. ii. 17. 18 ; Rev. ii. 1416, 20; Gal. v. 12. These passages, relating primarily to teachers, are constructively applicable to private members. If we may not harbor false teachers, we may not tolerate false doctrines among ourselves. In both cases, " they will increase unto more ungodliness, and their word will eat as doth a canker." It may be difficult to say to what extent a person may " err from the truth," and yet not be worthy of discipline or rejection. All truth is important ; but not all is funda- mental ; and to some extent charity must be exercised. " Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful dispu- tations." But with regard to those truths, 9 98 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. the denial of which would be subversive of the Christian system, there can be no question. Such doubtless are the doc- trines of Christ's divinity and atonement ; regeneration by the Spirit ; justification by faith ; the necessity of a holy life ; and the future punishment of the impenitent. The denial of some of these is inconsistent with " holding the head ;" w T hile others of them make Christ the minister of sin, and are licentious. 3. Troubling the peace of the church. by raising parties in it. " A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admoni- jtion, reject ;" the word heretic, in the origi- jnal, meaning the leader of. a faction, raised Jcommonly on the ground of his peculiar : doctrinal opinions ; but applicable to any factious leader, whether the division be for doctrines, measures, or men. Tit. iii. 10 ; Rom. xvi. 17, 18; Gal. v. 12. The case here does not respect the mor- als of the individual. He may be very cor- rect in other respects, and even devout ; CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 99 but this must not exempt him from disci- pline. So far from it, the more he has of these fair qualities, the more able he will be, " by good words and fair speeches, to deceive the hearts of the simple." 4. An idle, useless life ; with such un- christian practices as an idle life begets. " For we hear that there are some which walk disorderly among you, working not at all, but are busy-bodies." " Not only idle, but tattlers also, and busy-bodies, speaking things which they ought not." 2 Thess. iii. 1114, 1 Tim. v. 13. These things, always grievous, and always requiring the private reproofs of the brethren, become, in aggravated cases, subjects for formal discipline. 5. JVeglecting to provide for one's depen- dent relatives, especially one's family, and le.aving them either to want the comforts of life, or to live on charity, whether through indolence or covetousness. This is a sin against nature, justice, and reli- 100 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. gion. " If any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel." 1 Tim. v. 8. 6. Refusing to bear a reasonable part in the pecuniary support of the gospel. If we consider that this is covetousness, (itself a disciplinable sin ;) that it is injustice ; for it robs the laborer of his hire, or robs oth- ers to make it good ; that it is disobedience to Christ^ who has " ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel," and made it the duty of " him that is taught in the word to communicate unto him that teacheth, in all good things ;" and that it betrays such indifference to the gos- pel, and such overvaluing of the world, as is not far from denying the faith, in a man- ner " worse than an infidel ;" we cannot doubt that it is worthy of discipline. In addition to these specific cases, we have the general precept, " Withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 101 disorderly." 2 Thess. iii. 6. What con- stitutes disorderly walking the enlightened moral sense of the church must determine. 4 It will be perceived that these offences are all of a different character, and require a different treatment, from that referred to in the eighteenth of Matthew. There, the offence is supposed to concern two individ- uals, between whom if the matter be set- tled, discipline is satisfied.* But the offen- ces enumerated here are scandalous and public. They concern the peace and puri- ty of the church, and the honor of religion ; and are no more a trespass against one member than against them all ; who are all therefore, alike concerned to remove them. * I ought, perhaps, to have noticed under our Savior'^ rule, that some critics conjecture, (but not with confidence,) that the words against thee, (sig as) should be omitted 5 being said to be wanting in some MSS. The passage is doubtless right, as it stands j but allowing the omission, it would not materially affect the rule. Instead of applying only to things of a person- al nature between members, it would then include any sin which, being done in private, and known only to a few, might be privately healed,. For sins publicly injurious, there is pub- lic discipline, which the rule of Christ does not supersede. 9* 102 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. There a brother is injured ; but here, Christ is wounded, and Zion mourns. MANNER OF PROCEEDING. In the prosecution of cases of discipline, much must be left to discretion. Some re- quire a more summary, and others a more prolonged and lenient course ; some may be healed more privately, others more openly : according as the nature of the of- fence and the interests of religion dictate. Those steps are to be taken which, in the exercise of a sound judgment, appear best adapted to secure the objects of discipline, and most agreeable to the laws of Christ. Charges against an offending member should be distinctly specified ; and should be seasonably communicated to the ac- cused, commonly in writing. They should be sustained by evidence.* Rumor and * Considerable embarrassment arises ; often, from the want of established rules of evidence. What kind and amount of evi- dence shall be required ? Is the informing member a compe- tent witness ? Are two or more witnesses always requisite to CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 103 presumption, though they may justify an inquiry on the part of the church, and of- ten demand it, are not a basis upon which to proceed to formal acts of discipline. As the reclaiming of the offender is the first object, commonly, it will be proper, in most cases, to labor with him in private. As the preventing of like sins in others, the conviction of the accused ? May a series of offences of the same kind, as for instance, the occasional utterance of pro- fane words, or acts of dishonesty, be regarded as proved by witnesses severally testifying" to the same offence, though not to the same instances of its commission ? To prevent such em- barrassment it is well to have the principles which are to guide us well considered, and embodied in our written rules, or arti- cles of practice. The following are copied from the rules of an intelligent church, and communicated to the author by its very judicious and respected Pastor. u No member shall be convicted but by the testimony of two or three witnesses, [Matt, xviii. 16] or that which is equiva- lent : but habits of criminal negligence may be charged with- out a specification of particular instances 5 and a series of overt offences of the same kind, and specified in a complaint, may be proved to the conviction of the accused, on the testimony of several competent witnesses although no more than one com- petent witness should testify to a single instance of offence in the series."-" In the trial of any case the investigation shall be conducted before the church by a committee annually chosen for that purpose; and the complainant shall be consid- ered a competent witness." 104 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. and the public credit of religion, are other objects to be regarded, it is necessary, in grievous cases, to cite the accused before the church, according to the direction, 1 Tim. v. 20. If he there make confession, and the church be satisfied, to admonish and forgive him is all that is requisite. But if he appear not to be penitent, it is customary, (though some object to this, as having, in their view, no scripture warrant, but I think without good reason,) to sus- pend him from the communion, in the hope that time being given him for reflection, and further means being used, he may come to repentance. If all fails, his ex- communication terminates the proceeding. " This (says President Edwards,) with the counsels and admonitions by which it is to be followed, is the last means that the church is to use, in order to reclaim those members which are become visibly wicked. If this be ineffectual, what is next to be ex- pected is destruction without remedy." In cases extremely iniquitous, or shame- ful, it appears to be the duty of the church. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 105 as its first act, to assemble and cast the offender out. The honor of religion de- mands it. This the Corinthians were di- rected to do in the case of the incestuous person ; 1 Cor. v. There were no prepar- atory steps to be taken. Some may question whether such sum- mary dealing is suited to recover the offen- der, and on that account may scruple its lawfulness ; since the recovery of the offender is to be regarded, as well as the honor of religion. But here are several things to be consid- ered. 1. The objection is a matter of opinion. The objector thinks the case is so. But in the view of others, the imme- diate excommunication of a heinous offen- der may be the means best suited to his re- covery. It may be argued, that this sol- emn and sorrowful act of the church, ex- pressing at once its abhorrence of the crime and its sense of the deep injury done to religion, while the shame of the culprit is now fresh in his own consciousness^ and legible in the faces of others, and while the 106 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. judgment of the world loudly confirms the judgment of the church ; is likely to be more impressive to him, and to show him more effectually to what a depth he is fal- len, than a more gradual procedure. Such was the effect upon the incestuous Corin- thian. So long as he retained his place in the church, he repented not ; but being cast out, he was filled with sorrow ; and was restored.* Besides, the act of excom- munication does not hinder the church from still using all hopeful means with the guilty member ; who, though separated from their communion, is not to be counted as an enemy, but admonished as a brother. There is no certainty that he will not be reclaimed, being cast out ; and there is none that he will be, if retained^. Though the reclaiming of the offender be a very important end of discipline, and ought to *2Cor. ii. 6 8. This passage may serve also, as a com- ment on the former, (1 Cor. v.) as to the manner in which the discipline was executed. It was the act of the church as a body : and not of its officers alone : " Sufficient to such a man is the punishment, which was inflicted of many ;" literal- ly, by the majority. CHURCH call into exercise all the wisdom, tender- ness and faithfulness, of the church, yet I am not certain that either reason or the Bible tells us that this is always the most important end. If we might suppose that the retaining him for a time, with all his infamy upon him, would be such a discred- it to religion, or so dangerous to the mem- bers, as in all likelihood to occasion the ruin of many souls, it would seem to be du- ty to cast him out even to the probable ruin of his, supposing this latter conse- ' quence to follow ; which, however, is not conceded. The question is, is his remain- ing in the church of greater importance than the church itself; and must we sacri- fice, or even jeopardize the church, in the uncertain hope of reclaiming him ? Grant that he may be a Christian, or that he cer- tainly is one, notwithstanding his crime ; he may not be a fit person* to be in the church at present. 3. If we have scrip- ture for the measure, that must suffice ; and this I think we have, in the case of the church at Corinth. 108 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. It is the opinion of some that our Sa- vior's rule in Matthew is to be followed in all cases, public as well as private ; and this is the practice of some churches. But in the view of others this is a misapplica- tion of the rule. For, 1. It does not ap- pear to consist with the obvious sense of the passage. The offence there contem- plated is a personal one : " If thy brother trespass against thee." If it be said that every offence may be assumed and treated as a personal one, inasmuch as it is a breach of a mutual and common covenant, then it is personal to all the members, and all ought to take the steps required : which is no where practiced, and would be ab- surd. 2. The rule, literally followed, does not appear to be adapted to satisfy the ends of discipline, in public cases. Take, for example, such as are mentioned by Paul, " If any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, a railer, a drunkard, fyc" A member goes to such an one and tells him his fault in private, following the rule of Christ. And suppose he confesses and CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 109 repents. Is the wounded honor of relig- ion healed, in this private way ? Is there a salutary impression made upon the church ? Is the offender himself deterred, by such easy terms, from a repetition of his sin ? No, not at all. An open, scan- dalous iniquity, blown far and wide by fame, calls for something more than pri- vate auricular confession. " Them that sin, rebuke before all, that others also may fear." I am aware that it is said that the visit- ing brother may require a public confes- sion, as the satisfaction he seeks ; and that so the public ends of discipline will be se- cured. But still this is not the rule. It does not say you shall go to your brother in private and require a public confession ; but it says, if he hear you in private, you are to regard the thing as settled. Our Savior evidently refers to a strictly personal and private affair, such as is often occurring between man and man, and of which the world takes no notice. At the 10 110 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. same time, this excellent rule is a standing law of wisdom, from which, doubtless, we are to draw lessons for almost every occa- sion of discipline. It teaches us to regard the natural infirmity of human nature, by using, when we may, private endeavors, rather than the more mortifying and pride- alarming ones of a public nature ; and to save religion itself from all needless ex- posure of the errors of its disciples, ft teaches us to be ever kind, gentle, and for- bearing ; and to use means for the recove- ry of such as are fallen, as mild, as various, as protracted, and as hopeful, as the na- ture of the case will admit. The following is the doctrine of the Cam- bridge Platform on the subject. " But if the offence be more public at first, and of a more heinous and criminal nature, to wit, such as are condemned by the light of nature, then the church, with- out such gradual proceeding, is to cast out the offender from their holy communion, for the further mortifying of his sin, and the healing of his soul in the day of the . CHURCH DISCIPLINE. Ill Lord Jesus."* With this agrees the Say- brook Platform. " Admonition is in case of private offences to be performed ac- cording to the rule in Matt, xviii. 15 17, and in case of public offences, openly be- fore the church, as the honor of the gospel, and the nature of the scandal, shall re- quire."! The doctrine of the Westminster Assembly's, or Presbyterian Directory for church censures is the same. FORSAKING THE COMMUNION. There is an offence not mentioned in the foregoing list, which must ,be noticed. It is when a member improperly forsakes the Lord's table. Why is the church to notice this ? 1. Because the member, having covenant- ed to walk with the church in Christian fellowship, and in a due observance of or- dinances, his forsaking its communion is a * Chap. xiv. t Heads of Agreement, Sect. iii. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. violation of that covenant. 2. There is something criminal in the motive) or state of mind, which induces the delinquency. Commonly it is some disagreement with a fellow member ; or some offence taken at the church, for some of its proceedings ; or at the pastor ; or the table is forsaken be- cause, in the judgment of the absconding member, some are found there who are un- worthy ; or it is forsaken through sloth and indifference ; or in the conscious shame of general declension and inconsistency. None of these motives are very Chris- tian ones : and I fear there is sometimes a worse than any of these. I fear there are instances, I hope not numerous, when the absenting member is actuated by malevo- lence. He forsakes the communion as an expression of his anger, or hostility. He does it supposing that it will disquiet the member with whom he is at variance, and that it will cast blame upon him. Or, if the church or the pastor is concerned, he thinks it will implicate and afflict them or him. He takes a course which shows an CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 113 assumption of judgment in his own favor, and an impeachment of the other party. The conduct is wrong, and the example bad, whatever be the motive. If you have a difficulty with a member, it is your duty, not to forsake the ordinances and -fellow- ship of the church, but to take immediate measures, according to the rule of Christ, for the healing of the difficulty. If your dis- satisfaction is with the doings or judgment of the church in some matter, upon howev- er clear or reasonable grounds your dissat- isfaction rests, your course is wrong not- withstanding ; for it is subversive of all or- der, by setting up the will of an individual above the whole, or perhaps, of a minority above the majority. You have a right to make your dissatisfaction known, if you choose, but this is not the way to do it. As to the presence of unworthy communi- cants, if that is your difficulty, it is your duty, not to forsake the communion on their account, but either to endeavor to have them properly disciplined, as you promised to do in your covenant, or else to 10* 114 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. bear with them, remembering that there are "tares" in all, even the best of church- es; and that wholly to eradicate them, even when they are visible, is often a mat- ter too difficult to be effected. But if all will not do, there is no remedy for you but to take an honorable dismission and remove which you ought not lightly to do to some other church. It does not avail to say you commune elsewhere. You covenanted to commune with this church. Nor does your commu- ning elsewhere help your example. It rath- er proclaims what ought to be hid, nay, what ought not to be. To those who know the reason of your absence, it looks as though you were living in a quarrel with a brother, or with the church, or your minister ; or had excommunicated them all for unsoundness, or disorder, having dis- owned and withdrawn yourself from them, and gone to another and better fraternity. To those who are ignorant of the reason, you appear as a simple neglecter of ordi- nances. They see your seat vacant in the CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 115 house of God, and at the Lord's table, and knowing no other cause, naturally enough conclude that you are abiding indolently at home. Jn a word, the practice is too sin- ful in itself, and too evil in its tendencies, to be allowed. It ought to be, as it is, a subject of discipline. MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL REMARKS ON THE SUBJECT OF DISCIPLINE. 1. It is to be remembered that all cases of discipline, once taken up, are to be brought to one of two results ; the reforma- tion of the offender, or else his excommu- nication. They must never be dropped short of one or the other of these issues. Hence it follows, that no matter can be a proper subject for discipline at all, (though it may be, for private reproof) for which the offender could not be scrip- turally excommunicated in case of his per- sisting in it. / i 2. ExGQnmujnicadg^ though it is essen- tially the same in its results in all cases, as 116 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. cutting the delinquent off from the name and privileges of membership, and is never a trivial affair ; yet, in respect to the form of it, it is susceptible of different degrees of severity. In the case of one who for- sakes the communion of the church, but is not otherwise scandalous, the church may simply disown, or cease to know him as a member. " He having thereby cut himself off from that church's communion, the church may justly esteem and declare it- self discharged of any further inspection over him.' 55 * It may withdraw its watch and care. But in the case of notorious and obstinate offenders, the act of excom- munication should be more formal and im- pressive. It should be something more than to pass and silently record a vote. " If the case be notoriously bad, pronounce sentence at the table of the Lord, with great solemnity. 7 '! Some declare it from the pulpit, in the most public manner. With this the scriptures appear to agree. * Saybrook Platform. t Doddridge. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 117 From some they direct us to ' withdraw' ourselves ; in the case of others, the direc- tion is, in language less mild, to c cut off? ' reject? and 'put away from among your- selves,' the wicked person. In the case of the very heinous offender at Corinth, the church was required to assemble, and in the most solemn manner, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, ' to deliver such an one unto Satan, [that is, as I understand it, to give him back again into that world which is Satan's kingdom, he being " the god of this world,"] for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. 3 3. It sometimes happens that an offend- ing member is so uninformed as to imagine that he can withdraw from the church at will, and thus escape from its censure. The gospel knows no such rule. It suppo- ses no separation from the church, except by regular dismission to another church, or by excommunication. 118 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 4. The censures of the church are to be administered by the pastor, in accordance with the vote of the brethren. Though the pastor is not competent to act without the church, he is not to be considered as the mere chairman, or as the mere executive, of the church, in the business of discipline. Far from this. He is set for the defence of the gospel as much in respect to its discipline as in any other respect ; and the Bible expects him to act and to be regarded in this, no less than in other things, as the guide and leader of the church. Vx 5. No member under censure of the church, or excommunicated by it, can law- fully be received to the communion and fellowship of another church ; and any church which should violate this plain law of propriety and duty, whether of the same or of another denomination, would be guil- ty of taking sides with the offender against the laws of Christ. If Christ himself has CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 119 declared* that he will confirm in heaven what a church does in the faithful execu- tion of his laws upon an offender, it is an act not far from rebellion, it is presumption not far from impious, in another church, to nullify what that church does, and to loose on earth what Christ binds in heaven, by taking the excluded member to its bosom. 6. The discipline of the church should be attended to promptly. It is better on every account, to -take an offence in the time of it, than after long delay. Neglect- ed sores are the most difficult to heal. Is the good of the offender regarded ? The reproof, lagging far behind the offence^ is likely to fail of effect. Is the honor of the church concerned ? Who delays, when his reputation is suffering, for months or years before he attempts to relieve it ? And is not the character of the church as valuable and as soon to be vindicated as that of a man ? * Matt, xviii. 18. 120 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. It must be faithful. Every reason which demands the discipline at all demands that it be thorough. " Great care is to be taken that we be not overstrict or rigorous, yet, the winning and healing of the offender's soul being the end of these endeavors, we must not daub with untempered mortar, nor heal the wounds of our brethren slight- ly."* I have before remarked that it should be carried through, when once taken up. To commence a process of dealing with an offender, and to drop or recede from it without an issue, leaving his sin upon him unrepented of, and the church unsatisfied, and the honor of religion unrelieved, is not only a sin against him, being an omission of those means which Christ has appointed for his recovery, but is disobedience to Christ, proclaims the weakness or unfaith- fulness of the church, and is a bad prece- dent which is likely both to multiply oc- casions for discipline, and to embarrass the treatment of them. *Camb. Platform. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 11 It must be uniform. Every offence, and not merely some offences, should receive its due attention. That is a badly adminis- tered government which is unequal, pur- suing some offenders and neglecting oth- ers ; or which is fitful and capricious, now negligent and now strenuous. It must be impartial. No pecuniary or family influence, no worldly consideration whatever, may cover the man of conse- quence, while a humbler member would experience no such forbearance. Or, in another view of the subject, let not the soul of the rich or honorable man be less regarded than the soul of the poor or ob- scure ; but let the same means be used for his recovery as for the other's. "I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou ob- serve these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiali- ty." 1 Tim. v. 21. 6. All the members should take part in the discharge of this important duty. 11 CHURCH DISCIPLINE, They should all sustain the discipline of the church by their presence and vote ; not only because this is the equal and com- mon duty of all, but because the efficacy of discipline depends, in a great degree, upon the concurrence of the whole society in it, instead of its resulting from the action of only a few. 7. It is of the greatest importance al- ways to keep in view the ends of discipline, and especially that end which, in all ordi- nary cases, is the first to be aimed at ; namely, the__recovery of the delinquent. That gained, all is gained. It is at once the most pleasing result in itself, and the most honorable to the church and the gos- pel. It is true that by the excommunica- tion of the offender, the church has cleared itself of the scandal ; but then a member is lost to it, and perhaps to himself. But if he be brought to true repentance, and to newness of life ; if, like Peter, he weep bitterly ; not only is the church relieved from the scandal, but it is the honored in- CHURCH DISCIPLINE 'strument of his recovery. While an un- feeling world would only have reproached, discarded, and hardened him, he becomes by means of the church, a man forgiven of God, and worthy of the renewed confi- dence and esteem of men. What more honored instrumentality, what more grati- fying result, than this ? 8. Too great heed cannot be taken as to what spirit we are of, in this matter. If the object be to gain our brother, this is not to be effected by a process of barren forms, much less by unkindness and re- proach. We must feel and manifest a real concern for his good. We must make him see, if possible, that though an erring brother, he is still regarded and treated as a brother ; and, if'he compel us to go so far as to divide him from our company, that it is with unfeigned sorrow we proceed to that extremity, in the discharge of a duty we dare not disregard. 9. The faithful performance of this duty is the truest test of a Christian church. 124 > CHURCH DISCIPLINE. The apostle writing to the Corinthians concerning the disorderly member whom he had required them to excommunicate, tells them he did it to prove the universali- ty and the reality of their obedience to Christ : " For to this end also did I write, that I might know the proof of you, wheth- er ye be obedient in all things." Whatev- er a church may be in respect to its creeds or its forms ; whatever diligence it may use in gathering numbers to a visible pro- fession within its pale ; however costly the temple it erects and dedicates to God, or thronged the attendance there ; ,! if it be wanting in the article of discipline, it lacks an essential proof of its being a genuine church of Christ*/ Ye are my friends, saith Christ, if ye do whatsoever I com- mand you ; and on what subject are his commands more explicit than on this ? It was their remissness in this particular, that called forth his rebukes of several of the seven churches of Asia ; and the faith- ful performance of it by others of them, that received his commendation. CHURCH DISCIPLINE. , 125 Finally ; I know of no language too strong to express the importance of this subject^r to impress it suitably on the mind. LThe discipline of the church, es- sential to its purity, is essential to every object for which it exists. Its increasing, and, eventually, entire corruption, will be the consequence of its neglecting this duty. Sin not purged out, is by an apostle com- pared to leaven, which leavens the mass. No such church can truly prosper ; or can answer the ends for which churches are instituted. Forfeiting the favor of Christ, through neglect of his laws ; losing the respect of the world, and its self-respect, through the tolerated scandals that spring up in it and blemish its character: it will go down hill decaying and losing its vitali- ty, till little shall remain to it but its name and form to distinguish it from the world. It is no longer a city set on a hill. Its comeliness, and beauty, and influence, are gone. It may still bear the ' banners/ but it no longer has the ' terribleness, 5 of an 126 CKURCH DISCIPLINE. army of Christ. Or, if it should appear outwardly to flourish, as some churches do, in whose assemblies the gay and the world- ly find it convenient to worship, some for fashion and some for form's sake, and where church ambition builds more dili- gently than godly sincerity and faithful- ness to souls, if it should go on growing in numbers, and accumulating materials of some sort, its prosperity is deceptive. " Thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked." Whatever it may have of the form, it will have little of the reality, of a spiritual so- ciety. It will want the simplicity, it will w r ant the fervor, the distinctness from the world, the religious energy and influence, and all that is proper to " a peculiar peo- ple, 57 purified by Christ. It is a field where tares grow by permission. They may increase its greenness and luxuriance for the time, and flatter the undiscerning eye of the cultivator, or beholder ; but CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 127 what will the harvest be " in the end of the world ?" If such be the importance of discipline, let it be faithfully attended to ; and let not fear or policy prevent. The case may arise, it often does 3 when to go forward in a thorough discharge of this duty may seem portentous of evil. It may threaten to har- rass the church with the resentments of disorderly but powerful members ; to. over- whelm it with clamors ; to diminish its strength ; or to destroy its existence. But faith is to be exercised here as in every thing else pertaining to the kingdom of Christ. The. remembrance that it. is Christ's laws that we are called to admin- ister, and Christ's church that is concern- ed in the consequences ; that it is his wis- dom that appoints, his authority that com- mands, his power that sustains ; and that, whatever the issue may be, it can never be worse than his displeasure ; should be our sufficient encouragement to proceed. There can be no ground to fear that he 128 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. will not vindicate his own laws, and bear out his church in a faithful administration of them. Nor let it be imagined that these laws can be dispensed with, without in- curring his frown, and revealing, sooner or later, the folly of forsaking the wisdom of Christ, for the timid dictates of human prudence.* * Very many facts might be given corroborative of these re- marks : showing in some cases the decay and corruption of churches through neglect of discipline; and in others, their great prosperity in consequence of its maintenance. Many in- stances might be mentioned of churches blessed with succes- sive revivals and large accessions in connection with the dis- charge of this duty. And this is what ought to be expected. For when is a church more prepared to be blessed in this man- ner than it is in that peculiar frame which is suited to the work of discipline 1 humble, prayerful, forgiving, and sensible of dependence on God. Or when is its separateness from the world more impressively evident to " them that are without/ 7 than when it divides the wicked from its company 1 A venerable minister related the following. He was the pastor of a small country parish in Connecticut. Six of the male members, persons of influence, became guilty of heinous offences, at one time. He began, with a heavy heart, to take such steps as the case required ; when some of the brethren besought him to desist, at least for a time, thinking, in consid- eration of the standing of these persons in society, and that of their families, that to subject them to discipline would prove the destruction of the church. To this timid policy he yielded ; CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 129 TREATMENT OF EXCOMMUNICATED PERSONS. We have a twofold duty to perform to- wards excommunicated persons. One re- spects the deportment we are to observe towards them in regard to society and in- tercourse ; the other respects the endeav- ors we are to use with a view to their re- pentance and return to the Christian fami- ly. We are to have no company with the excommunicate, that he may be ashamed ; yet we are not to count him as an enemy but admonish him as a brother. 2 Thess. iii. 14, 15. and " from that time," his language was, " the church visibly went down, down, down, till it scarcely existed, and seemed threatened with a total extinction. I perceived my error and awoke to my duty 5 and going to such of the members as I could most confide in, whom I found by this time to be of my mind, I said to them, ' We must go forward and execute the laws of Christ's house. 7 We did so 5 and in one day cut off the six. " I had appointed a meeting that evening at a private house, by desire of a poor sick woman whom illness had long detained from our public assemblies. I went expecting to meet a few neighbors only, when, to my great Surprise, the house was filled. The Spirit of God was there, -and for those six, the Lord gave us sixty ! that number being added to the church as the fruit of the revival which then commenced." 130 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. At 1 Cor. v. 11, the direction is not to keep company with such as are there described, " no not to eat ;" which some have interpreted the not making them our guests, or being theirs ; but which is more commonly supposed to mean, that we must not voluntarily sit down with them even to an ordinary meal. I say, with such as are there described, viz. " fornicators, covetous, idolaters, railers, drunkards," and other grossly licentious and vicious persons. Some have understood the injunction, " no not to eat" to apply to all excommunicated persons ; but I think with doubtful propri- ety ; for this is reducing all offences, the most heinous and the least so, to a com- mon level, and subjecting them all to a common measure of abhorrence. Besides, the words are applied by the apostle to a specific class of offences ; " with such an one, no not to eat." From a view of the several passages which speak of this subject, it appears to me this general inference is to be drawn ; namely, that we are to treat each excommu- CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 131 nicated person according to the character of his offence. From a member who walks disorderly we are to withdraw ourselves. He is disowned of the Christian family, and while he remains so, we are to have no further communion or fellowship with him. He is not to be recognised as a pro- fessor of religion, or as a Christian. This is a general rule. Others are more spe- cific. Them that cause divisions we are to mark and avoid. We are to treat them as dangerous persons ; from whom we are to keep at a distance, as the most suitable way of expressing our disapprobation of them, and, at the same time, the most effectual way of preventing their mischiefs : for factious leaders are soon out of counte- nance when they can get none to adhere or listen to them. The same remark may apply to errorists in doctrine. " Let them alone." A member persisting in an injury done to another to that degree that he contemns or resists the united endeavors of the church, till they are forced to expel him, is to discover, in their subsequent deport- 132 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. ment towards him, that his religious char- acter, in their view, is no better than thm of " a heathen man and a publican," while the indecent, licentious, and abominable,, are to be avoided to the utmost degree, as to our having any society with them, even so much as to eat. They are to be viewed and treated as men whose deeds are shameful, and themselves abhorrent to the Christian name. In every case there is a greater reserve required to be observed towards excommu- nicated persons than towards the same .grade of sinners who are not of the church. See 1 Cor. v. 9 11, where a distinction is made between sinners of the world and ex- communicated professors. As a general remark it may be observed, that whatever our deportment is to be in particular cases, it should in all cases be such, towards persons under censure of the church, whether before excommunica- tion, or after, as to sustain and consist with the object of the censure, and not to defeat it. It were a vain thing to impose a cen- CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 133 sure by our vote, and then nullify it by our actions. It is our behavior towards the subject, and not the formality of a vote merely, that must give efficacy to the discipline. But while we may manifest no compla- cency in the excommunicate as a Chris- tian, we are riot to forget his soul, or to cast him off utterly from our Christian re- gards, but are to use all suitable means to bring him back to repentance and to Christ. It was for this very end, among others, we should remember, that he was cut off from the church, that by his loss of its privileges and its Christian esteem, he might be made more sensible of his fallen condition. Perhaps we should show even more concern for him (though hope be less,) than if he had never sustained to us the endeared but forfeited relation of a brother in Christ. Exceptions are of course to be made in favor of the common duties and offices of humanity ; such as relieving the sick and distressed ; and in favor of the domestic 134 CHURCH DISCIPLINE. and other relations. " Excommunication doth not release children from the obliga- tion of duty to their parents, nor parents from parental affection and care towards their children. Nor are husbands and wives released from the duties proper to their relation. And so of all other less relations, whether natural, domestic, or civil."* Whenever the excommunicate becomes a penitent, and satisfies the church of the same by a due confession of his sin, he is then to be restored. 2 Cor. ii. 8. * Pres. Edwards. CHAPTER V. CHURCH MEETINGS AND CHURCH BUSINESS. EVERY church has its meetings for busi- ness. It were to be wished that such meetings were more frequent than they are, in most of our churches. The desira- bleness of them must be obvious to every one who reflects on the variety and impor- tance of the interests over which every church is called to exercise its wisdom and care. Besides attention to discipline, how many occasions are there for consultation on the state of religion and the means of reviving it; for devising ways and means for the support of the gospel at home, and its extension abroad ; for attending to the various concerns of the Sabbath school ; the choir; the relief of the poor, and other important matters ? " More time, (says Dr. Beecher,) should be devoted by the 136 CHURCH MEETINGS members of local churches to consultation and social prayer. No secular interest so diversified, extended, important, and diffi- cult, depending on the resources and steady co-operation of so many individuals, of different age and capacity, could be suc- cessfully protected, and extended, without reiterated consultation. And yet how dif- ficult, how almost impossible it is, to con- vene punctually the members of almost any church, to attend to the public con- cerns of Christ's kingdom, and to implore the blessing of God upon their labors." The duty of attending, punctually and faithfully, the business meetings of the church, may be urged upon every member, on the ground that whatever is done, or to be done, at these meetings, is the equal concern of all ; being made so by their mu- tual equality as brethren, by their mutual and common covenant, and by their com- mon relation and obligation to Christ and his cause. Though the business can be done perhaps, by a part of the members, it cannot be done as well as if all were there AND CHURCH BUSINESS. 137 who should be. For where responsibility is to be borne, or judgment to be exercised, " two are better than one," and " in the multitude of counsellors there is safety." It cannot be done as well, and if it could be, there is no propriety in some leaving it to be done by others, whose obligation is no greater than theirs. Let such reflect that, were all to do as they do, who might with equal propriety, the meeting fails en- tirely, the business is deserted, and the cause suffers. In regard to the order to be observed in these meetings, they should always be opened, if not concluded, with prayer. In the absence of the pastor, one of the dea- cons presides. Every member has an equal right to express his views ; and it is desirable that as much freedom should be used as is consistent with a becoming mod- esty and despatch of business. Yet it is a good rule, " Let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak ;" and, " Likewise ye younger submit yourselves unto the elder: yea, all of you be subject one to another, 12* 138 CHURCH MEETINGS and be clothed with humility." Talkative persons are an affliction in any assembly. The meeting should be conducted throughout with seriousness and dignity, as in Christ's presence and about his busi- ness. For where two or three are gather- ed together in his name, whether for busi- ness or devotion, there is he in the midst of them. Especially should we observe such serious deportment when we are met to attend to discipline. It is the serious- ness and dignity of the meeting, joined with meekness and benignity, as acting in Christ's presence and by his authority, that makes its censures impressive to the subject of them, and commands the res- pect of all. ARTICLES OF PRACTICE. Many of our churches, it is believed, have, besides their Confession of faith and covenant, no written rules of discipline and practice ; being guided by the few simple and well known usages which have de- AND CHURCH BUSINESS. 139 scended from one generation to another. Others think it expedient to have such rules. Care should be taken in forming them that they be not more numerous than is necessary ; and that they be not of a legis- lative character, but only declarative of the settled and acknowledged principles of Congregationalism and the gospel. Their province is to ascertain and record, and not to originate, the usages of the church- es. We have no power to legislate for the church of Christ. We have no power to institute conditions of membership which he has not instituted ; to impose what he has not imposed, whether in substance or in form ; or in any manner to command or prohibit beyond what is written : we have no authority to construct churches on another plan than his. The terms of admission into the Chris- tian family are, according to the New Testament, cegeniance^tow-aFds- God and faith in Jesus Christ. Any applicant for admission, satisfying us on these points, is 140 CHURCH MEETINGS to be received. These are the great es- sentials, the grand characteristics, which distinguish the people of God from the rest of mankind. Let them remain such. Oth- er foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. It would seem, then, to be an unauthor- ized procedure on the part of a church to meet the applicant with other conditions besides these such, for example, as his putting his name to a g]edge, by which he shall bind himself to particular modes and movements of reform. If once the churches begin to depart from that original simplici- ty in which they were instituted by Christ, accommodating themselves to the shifting fashions of the age, and assuming names and forms unknown in primitive practice, there is no end to the refinements, addi- tions, and mischiefs, which are likely to ensue.* * If it he proper for a church to resolve itself into an anti- masonic, anti-slavery, moral reform, plain-dress, dietetic, or ven a temperance society, or church, then it may resolve it- ielf into all these, and a multitude more. And if it may re- AND CHURCH BUSINESS. 141 It should be farther observed, that we ought as consistent Congregationalists to ob- quire the candidate for admission to subscribe one of the con- stitutions, or pledges, pertaining to these reforms, as an unal- terable condition of membership, it may require his subscrip- tion to all of them, and to as many more as it may choose to adopt, till, in the multitude of her new shapes and dresses, all distinction is confounded between the church of Christ and the institutions of men. The sins themselves which are contemplated in these various departments of reform every Christian is bound to abstain from and to discountenance j and this the church has a right to expect of him. But it has no right to prescribe to him the mode in which he shall promote such reforms, except so far as it is expressly prescribed by the word of God. It may require that he shall give the testimony of his own good example in favor of morality and against the sins in question ; and, that lie shall u do good 11 as he conceives he has " opportunity." So much it may require of him because so much is required by Christ, and is necessarily involved in a profession of Christian- ity. But it has no right to require that he shall subscribe this and that pledge, or constitution ; attach himself to this and that popular movement of reform 5 wear a particular dress ; con- form to prescribed rules of health ; or put on any harness, pan- oply, or armor, of man's devising. And if he has a right to be free in these things, he has a right to be perfectly free, without reproach or abatement of charity on the part of his fellow members. The LIBERTY which the gospel allows to its professors in things not essential to godli- ness, is among its most delightful features and best gifts, and ought not to be surrendered. Acts xv. 10, 28, 29 ; 1 Cor. x. 29 5 Gal. v. 1 ; Matt, xxiii. 4. 142 CHURCH MEETINGS ject to such articles of subscription. As Congregationalists we profess to object to all human standards as conditions of mem- bership and good standing in the church of Christ. But to what purpose is it that we object to these, if in place of Creeds and Directories imposed by Ecclesiastical Authority, we are to have the Corporation and Test Acts the pledges and constitu- tions of our numberless societies and schemes for reform ? STANDING COMMITTEES. Many of our churches have standing committees. Such committees, charged S with a general oversight of the ordinary in- \ terests of the church, may be very service- lable. But in assigning them their duties, care should be taken not to violate the es- sential principles of the Congregational system. I have before me instances of such committees invested with powers al- most identical with those of a Presbyterian AND CHURCH BUSINESS. 143 session. To commit the watch and disci- pline of the church to a permanent com- mittee, in such a manner as to discharge the church as a body from those duties, is not Congregationalism. CHAPTER VI. RELATIONS OF PASTOR AND PEOPLE. THE Congregational churches, like the primitive, and most of the modern church- es, have their settled Pastors. A ministry wholly itinerant, or often changing, though it may render much excellent service, is not adequate to all the wants of churches and societies, nor competent to all the good which the Christian ministry is de- signed to effect. The officers of a church are essential to its organization. It is in- complete without them, and especially without its pastor. The pastoral office is, by divine appoint- ment, a permanent office in every church ; its duties are permanent ; the necessities of the church and community are such as at all times to demand its exercise. Hence the New Testament churches had their PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 145 permanent pastors. " They ordained them elders in every city." And hence the ex- plicit and careful instructions which are given respecting the qualifications and du- ties which pertain to this office, and the duty of the people in regard to it. A church, or society, that has no settled minister, has no pastor. It may have a series of occasional supplies, or a succes- sion of evangelists, missionaries, or travel- ing preachers, but the man that fills its pulpit is not its pastor. He has not the relations, and consequently has not the sympathies, nor the responsibilities and cares, which are peculiar to that office. The benefits of a settled ministry are very great. The relation is an endeared one both to minister and people. He dwells among them as a shepherd among his flock, whose voice they know. He is not a stranger held loosely to them by a temporary connection ; but has his home and his children's home among them. He is acquainted with every family. He knows their history, their character, their 13 146 RELATIONS OF circumstances, their joys, griefs, sickness- es. He is with them at their marriages, and at their funerals ; and on many occa- sions of anxiety, of delicacy, of embarrass- ment and distress, such as the stranger in- termeddleth not with, is their tried friend, counsellor, and comforter. He is the baptizer of their children ; and with a concern inferior only to that of the parents, and often surpassing that, he watches over their advancing childhood and youth. He is the judicious friend of education, and of all which pertains to the good of the community ; in which he has the threefold interest of a pastor, a citizen, and a father. He is identified with his people in all that concerns their welfare. His home is the well known place of re- sort and entertainment for clergymen and other religious strangers who visit the place. Being a permanent resident, he is more concerned for the results of his ministry than he naturally would be, were his stay PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 147 but temporary. He cannot, like those whose stay is short, light fires, in his bold- ness or imprudence, and then go off by the light of them, and leave them to burn, or be quenched by others. He feels a growing interest in his flock. The longer he is with them, the more he labors and cares for them, -the oftener he is called to sympathize with them, weeping with those that weep, and rejoicing with those that rejoice, and the more he expe- riences of their kindness towards himself, the deeper does his affectionate concern for them naturally become. I know of no affection more sacred and unquencha- ble than that of a long settled pastor for his people. The settled pastor is acquainted with the spiritual condition of his people, as a stranger cannot be, and knows what is needful for them, from time to time, in the way of instruction, reproof, or consolation. Directed by this knowledge, and compelled too by the permanency of his ministry and his unchanging auditory, he of necessity 148 RELATIONS OF takes a wider compass in his preaching, and his hearers receive, in the end, a greater variety and amount of instruction than would, or perhaps could be given, by a succession of transient preachers. The itinerant preacher, with an audience al- ways new, needs but a few discourses, in memory or manuscript, to answer his calls. He is not obliged to be very diversified in his ministrations, nor is it probable that he will be. He naturally selects a few topics, and those commonly which are the most exciting, and the most obvious and famil- iar ; and with these begins and finishes his temporary work. Another follows, and then another, much in the same strain. The consequence is that the people, though abundantly and fervidly exhorted upon a few topics, acquire but a defective knowl- edge of truth. It is not so with the settled pastor. It depends on him, and he feels it to be his duty, as one set apart for the instruction of a particular people, to acquaint them with the whole counsel of God. They PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 149 look to him chiefly for the bread of life, and to him the injunction comes emphatically and solemnly, "Take heed therefore unto yourselves and to all the flock, over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God." The church cannot be fed as the pastor is required to feed them, they cannot be instructed gen- erally and fully in the knowledge of reli- gious truth and duty, in a few random dis- courses, however elaborately prepared, or fervidly delivered. An itinerant or changing ministry can never be substituted for a settled and per- manent one without great detriment to the interests of religion. This is the growing conviction of the land. It is a conviction established by all history, but especially by our recent experience of the results and tendencies of itinerant labors. It was formerly the practice of the New England churches to settle their ministers for life. The relation of pastor and people was deemed almost as sacred as marriage itself. The same is the practice now to a 13* 150 RELATIONS OF considerable extent : but there are too ma- ny exceptions so many, perhaps, that the exceptions have become the rule. The practice of dismissing a minister " for eve- ry cause" is one of the sins of the times. And it has become quite common to pro- vide for the dissolution of the union at the time of its formation. A condition is in- serted in the terms of settlement by which either party is at liberty to terminate the connection at pleasure, on giving a certain specified notice. It is easy to see the effect of such a con- dition. Neither of the parties feels secure of the permanency of the connection. The pastor, (if it be proper to call him so in such circumstances,) feels that he is still a candidate, a preacher on probation, as much after his ordination as before. And the people feel that his connection with them is to continue only till he can do better elsewhere, and that his voluntary remain- ing with them is a presumptive evidence that his present situation is, for the time being, the most eligible he can command. PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 151 He on his part feels that his continuance is at all times precarious ; that the mere vote of a majority, however obtained, in a par- ish meeting, is all that is necessary to his receiving the specified " notice ;" that the very fact that his removal may be so ef- fected is a standing temptation to any dis- affected or restless individual, or faction, to endeavor to secure such a vote ; and that all that is servile, timid, indifferent, or dis- organizing, in the materials of the society, is available for his dismission, to such as are seeking that result. And the people are equally insecure on their part. But how unpropitious is a connection of this nature to that endeared, confiding, sa- cred intimacy which ought to subsist be- tween the shepherd and the flock ! And is this the kind of union which Christ in- tended should be formed between his min- isters and churches? Did the primitive churches settle their ministers so ? The frequent dismission of ministers is an evil to all concerned. Its tendency is 152 RELATIONS OF to unsettle the habits, and, in various ways, to diminish the prosperity of our churches. Every instance of removing one and set- tling another causes some to be dissatisfi- ed, if it do not produce division and defec- tion. It has an effect, ^too, to multiply itching ears, and to induce a habit of cu- rious and speculative hearing, rather than of sober profiting by the word. Its effect on ministers is perhaps almost equally bad. It unsettles their minds ; diminishes the strength of their attachments ; embar- rasses their domestic arrangements ; frus- trates or prevents their plans ; and in va- rious ways detracts largely from their effi- ciency and usefulness. In every instance of their removal it deprives them of that acquired knowledge of the people, and ac- quired influence, which in new circumstan- ces it takes months and even years to gain. It will be found by observation that those churches are most prosperous which are least addicted to a frequent change of ministers. PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 153 It belongs to the present chapter to speak of the powers and prerogatives of the minister, and of his relations with the people. Though it is not the province of the pas- tor to govern the church as a magistrate, or legislator, yet he is not destitute of au- thority. He has the authority of a spiritual guide and overseer. He has authority as Christ's ambassador, and commissioned ex- pounder of his will ; and as such the peo- ple are bound to respect him. I cannot express myself more happily on this sub- ject than in the following language of Mr. James. " Still, however, there is authority be- longing to the pastor ; for office without authority is a solecism. " Remember them that have the rule over you" said St. Paul to the Hebrews, xiii. 7. " Obey them that have the rule over you. Submit yourselves, for they watch for your souls," 17. "They addicted themselves to the ministry ; sub- mit yourselves to such." 1 Cor. xvi. 15, 16. These are inspired injunctions, and 154 RELATIONS OF they enjoin obedience and submission on Christian churches to their pastors. The authprity of pastors, however, is not legis- lative or coercive, but simply declarative and executive. To define with precision its limits, is as difficult * PASTOR AND PEOPLE. ^W 157 some mischievous errorist arrives among you, and by authority of your society's committee, or by vote of an inconsiderate or clamorous majority, gains the admission which he seeks ; and entering into your minister's place and fold, " brings in dam- nable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them ;" whose " pernicious ways" many are likely to follow, and " by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of." Would you judge of your min- ister's feelings in such a case, you may consider what your own would be, to see an enemy traversing your field with tares. It is beneath the character of a minister, and subversive of his usefulness and com- fort, to share his pulpit with those who preach another gospel, and pull down what he builds up. It does not much alter the case if the in- truder be orthodox. He is a preacher, suppose, of another denomination, or a traveling one of your own, whose piety is not questioned, and whose labors in other places are extolled in the newspapers ; 14 158 RELATIONS OF still there may be reasons, and sufficient ones, in the mind of your pastor, for not inviting him into the pulpit. If it be wrong to force his admission, it is wrong to compass the same thing by such importunity, or intimations of displeas- ure, as the pastor will not choose to with- stand. It may be proper to express your wishes to him, but beyond this you should leave the matter to him. When you call- ed him to be your pastor you committed to him the spiritual oversight of the society. You confided in him as a good anJ faithful man. If you have ceased to repose such confidence in him, it is better that the con- nection be dissolved than that you invade his rights. He may err in given cases, and good be prevented ; but as a general thing, more evil will result from the course which is here objected to. The pulpit is a sacred public interest which must be intrusted to somebody. If it be intrusted to the pastor, as the known and universal practice, the people will gen- erally be satisfied. But if it be assumed PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 159 by others, dissatisfaction, if not division and open contention, will be the conse- quence. And let it once be known abroad that the pastor's wishes have ceased to be regarded in reference to the pulpit, and that it is given up to other and especially to irresponsible persons, whether within or without the parish ;. and that fact, while it declares that he has too little of the es- teem and confidence of the people to be useful among them, is a general proclama- tion to whomsoever will, to resort thither to disseminate their doctrines. Such a parish has no unity, and no head ; and its ruin is neither problematical nor distant.* Nor can the blessing of God be reasona- bly expected on the labors of a preacher, or lecturer, who so intrudes himself into the place of another. He who has institu- ted the pastoral office, and charged it with * It is a matter of experience that any public building which is thrown open to other than its appropriate uses, as, for exam- ple, a court house, a town hall, or a joint stock meeting house, built by several denominations and controlled by none of them, is sure to be occupied by all sorts of speakers and assemblies. 160 RELATIONS OF its important responsibilities, and com- manded the respect of the people for it, will not sanction the intrusion. Nor is the intruder himself, in whatever name or live- ry he comes, entitled to common respect. If the people may not thrust men upon their pastor, still less may they thrust upon him doctrines and measures. To require that he shall surrender his private judg- ment, and adopt opinions and pursue meas- ures which are prescribed to him by oth- ers ; that he shall allow others to think and determine for him, and bow submissively to the dictation either of individuals or as- semblies of men, is an invasion of his rights not only as a pastor, but as a man. And more than this, it is an affront to his divine Master. "Who art thou that judgest another man's servant ? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea he shall be holden up : for God is able to make him stand." Paul though he ' made himself a servant to all,' strenuously asserted his liberty, both as a minister and as a man ; PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 161 declaring himself to be " free from all men," and accountable to God alone.* A ministry without the liberty of judging for itself would be worthless, a servile, weak, uncertain thing, fit for the purposes of designing and misguided men, but most unfit for the ends for which it was institu- ted ; and destined speedily to sink into universal and merited contempt. Neither God nor man can honor such a ministry. Christ has enjoined it on his ministers to preserve their moral freedom, under him, and never to yield it to human fear or favor. The people themselves have the greatest interest in the preservation of the freedom and independence of the pulpit. For what- ever else they may think it desirable their minister should be, it is first of all desira- ble that he should be an honest man. But an honest man he ceases to be, and be- comes a time-server and a dissembler, or * See, among other instances of his noble vindication of his natural and Christian liberty, 1 Cor. iv, 16 5 ix, 1 5 5 Rom. iiv. 3, 4, 10, 13. 14* 162 RELATIONS OF at best a machine, from the moment he surrenders his judgment and conscience to the control of others, and consents to obey men rather than God. It ought to be borne in mind, that the great influence which pertains to the Chris- tian ministry has created a disposition, in all ages, to invade its freedom. Wicked men have sought to restrain it by intimida- tion : while, on the other hand, men pro- fessing zeal for God, and conceiving their own wisdom to be infallible, have thought it their duty either to coerce the ministry into a concurrence with themselves, or else to break it down. This latter influence is far more dangerous and mischievous than the other. It has done far more to annoy and depress the ministry, and is unspeaka- bly more to be deprecated. It is an influ- ence which not only ministers themselves are bound to withstand, with magnanimity and constancy, in the name of their Lord, but all are bound to do so, who have any respect for the office as a divine institution ; any concern for its legitimate results ; or PASTOR AND PEOPLE. any regard for the personal rights of those who are called to the discharge of its high and responsible duties. But while these things are conceded to the pastor, there are, on the other hand, certain things which the people have a right to expect from him. They have a right to expect that he will neither desert nor abuse the trusts committed to him. Their own feelings and rights are to be held as sacred as his ; and while they commit to him, with an affectionate confidence, as the people of his charge, the important in- terests of the pulpit, they have a right to presume that he, as their affectionate and faithful pastor, will not use the pulpit, or suffer it to be used by others, for purposes foreign to the general end for which it was instituted, and tending to the destruction of the peace, order, and integrity of the so- ciety. They have a right to presume that he will not introduce there, either men or things, not necessarily connected with the duties of his office, which are known to be 164 RELATIONS OF odious or strongly disagreeable to a res- pectable portion of his hearers, if not to all. And the same reasons which forbid his do- ing so, forbid any members of the society urging him to do so, to whom the introduc- tion of such men and things might be agreeable. The organization of a parish and settle- ment of a minister is to a certain extent a conventional thing ; and involves prescrip- tive and conventional rights which it may justly be presumed none of the parties will invade. Thus the parties are supposed of course to agree as to the general object of the ar- rangement, viz. the promotion of religion. They are also supposed to agree as to the system of truth and church order which are to be maintained there; as whether the creed is to be Calvinistic or Arminian ; and the order and discipline, Congregational, Episcopal, or some other. Whatever is in- cluded in the known faith and practice of the denomination to which the society pro- PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 165 fesses to belong is supposed to be admitted and understood by all the parties ; and no conventional rights are infringed upon so long as all the parties keep within the sup- posed limits of the arrangement. Beyond those limits rights are invaded. When, therefore, a minister becomes the pastor of that church and society he justly presumes himself to be invested with all the customary prerogatives, as well as charged with the duties, of that office. They are his by prescription and tacit con- sent, (waiving other grounds of claim) un- less he is previously and expressly appri- sed to the contrary, and yields them by stipulation. He may waive the exercise of his rights as a pastor in given cases, if he will, but they cannot justly be taken from or denied him by the people. The conventional rights of the other par- ty may be invaded by the pastor in various ways. He may do it by using the pulpit for purposes contrary to the objects for which it was erected. Suppose that, being the 166 RELATIONS OF pastor of a Trinitarian and evangelical church, he preaches, or lends his pulpit to another to preach, the doctrines of Unita- rianism, or Universalism ; or being the pastor of a Baptist church, he administers baptism by sprinkling, or administers it to infants. He may hold those sentiments, or modes, if he will, as a man ; but he may not propagate them in the way supposed, or hold them consistently with his existing relations. The truth and falsehood of the conflicting systems are not the question here, but what are the just expectations of the people ? The truth itself is not to be preached in violation of common hones- ty and good faith. Again these rights may be infringed by the introduction into the pulpit of subjects foreign to the ends for which it was insti- tuted. Thus if the discussion of political questions be introduced there, it is unau- thorized. The place was not made for that end. I speak of political questions as such. It is not to be denied that the great moral questions, or principles, which are PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 167 often involved in politics, are proper sub- jects for discussion, in a proper manner, and as moral questions, in the Christian pulpit. Again it may be held to be an infringe- ment of conventional rights to introduce subjects which, though they may not be in their nature wholly foreign to the pulpit, are not necessarily involved in a due dis- charge of its duties, and are at the same time an invariable and known cause of dis- sention and distraction. Such are some of the agitating schemes of the present day. The object which the schemes affect may be benevolent and good, but the schemes themselves are human. They do not, like the precept, " Follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another," come within the revealed " counsel of God," and may not be forced upon either the minister or the congregation. The parish was not organized, nor the house built, nor the pastor settled, with these schemes in view ; and since God has not commanded it, if 168 RELATIONS OF they are introduced, it ought to be by con- sent of parties. Once more. The people suffer wrong, and their just expectations are disregarded, by the pastor deserting or consigning to other hands the trusts committed to him. Suppose that in a time of special attention to religion he is assisted by a stranger ; and that this stranger, bringing his own novelties with him, assumes that he knows better than the pastor what ought to be done, and acts accordingly. He takes it upon him to direct what meetings shall be held, what measures adopted, who and how many shall be admitted to the church, how soon they shall be admitted, speaks with authority, and is in all respects, for the time being, virtually the pastor. Now can the pastor, consistently with his duty, can he consistently with the trusts reposed in him by the people that called him, and the council that ordained him, stand aside from his office, and give up the reins to this stranger ? If the field has been com- PASTOR AND PEOPLE. 169 mitted to his keeping, may he consign it to another ? Or suppose a member, or members, of his own congregation should rise up and as- sume that they know better than he how affairs should be conducted : may he re- sign his charge to them ? Every conside- rate person will answer, No ! The people did not call these persons to exercise the trusts of the pastoral office, and their doing so is a usurpation. A minister certainly should have the privilege of calling in as- sistance when it is necessary ; but he ought ever to maintain his place as a pas- tor, and never resign up his judgment and authority and hand over his parish to others. 15 I CHAPTER VII. DEACONS. THE office of Deacons was first institu- ted, as is generally thought, Acts vi. 1 6. The qualifications of the 'men who are to fill the office are, as mentioned at the time of its institution, that they be "men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom," that is, of unblemished reputation, distinguished piety, and sound judgment ; and more particularly, 1 Tim. iii. 8 10 ; " Likewise must the deacons be grave, not double tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre ; holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience. And let these also first be proved; then let them use the office of deacon, being found blameless." Which may be para- phrased thus ; grave, sincere, temperate, not avaricious, of thorough knowledge of DEACONS. 171 the truth and sincerely attached to it, and of tried and established worth. It is also added that they should be men who " rule their children and their own houses well." These are the qualities which churches are bound to seek in a candidate for the office, and this is the character which every dea- con should endeavor to sustain. Their dutresjjare these : 1. To receive and distribute the alms of the church. This was the service to which they were specially appointed at the first. It is commonly assigned to them in our churches. 2. To distribute the bread and wine of the Lord's supper. 3. To act, in some respects, as assis- tants and substitutes to the pastor. In the pastor's absence they preside at the meet- ings of the church ; and when there is no preacher, they conduct its worship. They are to have some prominence among the brethren in things pertaining to edification, as teachers and leaders. This is argued from their required qualifications, 172 DEACONS. particularly from their being required to be men of more than ordinary piety and knowledge of the truth. " I see no reason why deacons should be required to be such as hold the mystery of the faith, a direction given concerning bishops, Tit. i. 9, unless this qualification was to be employed in some manner and degree, for the same ends. In a bishop this qualification is required, that he may be able, by sound doctrine, both to exhort, and to convince gainsay ers. There is un- doubtedly no warrant given to deacons in the Scriptures to preach. But there are a multitude of religious instructions, of very great importance, which are to be given to many persons, and on many occasions, and which are still remote from preaching. Of these the most formal is that class of in- structions which are appropriately styled catechetical. Another class is made up of the teaching immediately given in pri- vate religious assemblies. Another still may be sufficiently described by the word occasional. In all these it would seem that DEACONS. 173 deacons might with great propriety act : and unless they were to act in these, or some other similar modes, it seems difficult to explain why they should be required to possess skill and soundness in the gospel."* From its being a part of their office to distribute the charities of the church to the afflicted poor, it seems peculiarly proper in them to be much in the habit of visiting that class of persons, for the purposes of sympathy and prayer with them, and of seeking them out and reporting their wants to the church. In regard to the manner of their intro- duction into office, 1. They are to be chosen by the church. Acts vi. 3, 5. 2. They are then to be set apart to the office by prayer and imposition of hands. This was originally done, Acts vi. 6 ; and there appears to be no good reason why the apostolic practice should not be follow- ed by us. *Dr. Dwight, 15* 174 DEACONS. Such being the place and qualifications of Deacons in the church, they are to be treated with that respect which is due to such an office. As a general fact the Deacons of the New England churches have in a good de- gree possessed the qualifications which are required. They have been men distin- guished for their sobriety, probity, and gen- eral excellence of character. The matter is proverbial. CHAPTER VIII. RELATIONS OF CHURCH AND SOCIETY PAR- ISH AFFAIRS. IN the settlement of a pastor the church and society act in separate capacities. And in this they must act harmoniously, or not at all ; their concurrence being neces- sary to an election. In all other cases, where their common interests are concern- ed, they act as one body. In settling a minister the order of pro- ceeding is this. The candidate usually preaches for a short term upon trial, especially if he be young in the ministry, at the invitation of a joint committee of the church and society. The question of giving a call is first tried in the church. If agreed to here, the vote is communicated to the society, inviting 176 PARISH AFFAIRS. its concurrence. In both bodies the ma- jority decides. The call, being concurred in by the so- ciety, is officially transmitted to the Pastor elect, by the committee ; who are expected to communicate to him the state of the vote, the proposed terms of salary, with such other facts, or circumstances, as it may be important to him to know. If the call be accepted, the usual council is convened to attend to the ordination ; before whom the committee lay the respec- tive votes and doings of the church and so- ciety, with the answer received, and other documents, if there be any, which the council may need. The parties to the contract, or legal act of settlement, are the minister and the so- ciety, or parish. The church enters into no legal obligations, distinct from the parish. For the grounds on which the church has a separate action from the society, and takes precedence of it, in calling a minis- ter, (the propriety of which is indisputable } PARISH AFFAIRS. 177 and which ought not to be departed from,) the reader may consult Mather's Ratio Disciplinae, and Upham's work with the the same title. The principal and obvious reason is, the securing a faithful ministry. It often happens that the majority of voters in society are not religious persons ; and as such persons are too apt to consult their worldly tastes and interests, there would be danger of an unhappy election. It is true that the present arrangement cannot always prevent such a choice, but it affords as much security as the case admits of. Two majorities are not so easily secured as one. And however the society may vote, the distinct voice of the church, unless the salt have lost its savor, will be for purity and faithfulness. The usage in question is scriptural, Congregational, and safe.* * This usage is recognized in law. " The parish, when the ministerial office is vacant, from an ancient and respectable usage, wait till the church have made choice of a minister, and have requested the concurrence of the parish 5 and if the parish do not concur, the election of the church is a nullity ; and if the church do concur, then a Contract of settlement is made wholly 178 PARISH AFFAIRS. SUPPORT OF THE MINISTER. The duty of providing for the mainte- nance of those who preach the g-ospel is so obvious., that to reasonable people there needs no argument on the subject. As, however, there are many who have never distinctly considered it, and have but fee- ble convictions with regard to it, while oth- ers deny and decry the duty, it may not unprofitably occupy a brief space, though far too brief to do it justice, in this volume.* between the parish and the minister, and is obligatory on them only." Bigelow's Digest of reported cases in Mass. The settlement is for life unless conditions be made to the contrary. " Where no tenure is annexed to the office of a min- ister by the terms of settlement, he does not hold the office at will, but for life, determinable for some good and sufficient cause, or by the consent of both parties." Ib. The decisions of councils are also regarded in law. The judicial proceedings of this Commonwealth furnish a lucid com- mentary on our ecclesiastical affairs. See the volume from which these notes are taken, Art. Parish. * There is also another thing which makes me unwilling to omit it the fact that ministers, from motives of delicacy, so seldom preach on this subject. There are reasons beyond those which affect the minister, for informing the people in re- gard to it. It concerns them all to understand it as a duty, en- PARISH AFFAIRS. 179 It is, in the first place, a matter of neces- sity that the people support the minister. The work of the ministry is such as to forbid his supporting himself; and how is he to live ? The Bible enjoins it on him to give himself entirely to his work. The work of the ministry is to be his one and all-absorbing employment, to the exclusion of every secular avocation. 1 Tim. iv. 13 16. 2 Tim. iv. 1, 2. The work requires such exclusive devotion. It is enough, and more than enough, for all his time, strength, and mind. He must therefore either live .of the gospel, or else leave it, or starve. If he attempt to support himself, his sa- cred profession must suffer. There is dis- traction between the two objects ; and either in this or in that, and indeed in both, the man must be unfruitful. The ex- periment has been abundantly tried ; and the result is known in too many melan- joined on them by the Bible ; and where a common burthen is to be borne, it is due to such as bear more than their propor- tion, that those who are ignorant or remiss should be apprised of their delinquency. 180 PARISH AFFAIRS. choly instances of a ministry careworn and barren, if not secularized and half apostate. It is therefore a matter of necessity, that he receive his support from the people. It is also just and reasonable. For he la- bors for the people's benefit. He leaves other professions, and his own interest, to be useful in this. Others labor for them- selves. The husbandman toils at the plough with the expectation of enriching his own granary. The merchant traffics for gain to be appropriated to himself and family. The mechanic sells his wares at a price. The .physician sends his bill ; the lawyer his amount of fees. The laborer expects his wages. But the minister labors with no such immediate view to his own emolu- ment. He alone, of men, goes and comes, studies, thinks, and labors, ,for the good of others, and keeps no reckoning. He fore- goes emolument, spends his time, wastes his health, is a stranger to ease, for their sake. Upon what principle is it, of justice, or of honor, that he should do this and not PARISH AFFAIBS. 181 be so much as furnished with needful food and raiment ? Have they a natural claim to his services ? Have they a right to com- mand them ? Not at all. He is naturally as " free from all men" as others are ; and has made himself " a servant to all," only at their invitation, and by his own consent. It is therefore just that he should re- ceive his support, leaving the necessity of it out of view. Thirdly, the Bible inculcates the duty. It has no reserve or delicacy on the sub- ject. He that calls ministers to their work has taken care that they be supported. He has manifested even a solicitude on the subject which is very observable. Under the Jewish dispensation he charged the Levites with the service of the sanctuary, and gave for their subsistence the tithes and offerings of their brethren ; and he re- peatedly charges the latter never to forget this duty, lest the former, deprived of their only dependence, should fail for want of bread. "Take heed to thyself that thou forget not the Levite as long as thou livest 16 182 PARISH AFFAIRS. upon the earth." And again, giving the reason, " The Levite that is within thy gates ; thou shalt not forsake him ; for he hath no part or inheritance with thee."* When our Lord sent forth the twelve to preach, he said, " Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass, in your purses : nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves ; for the workman is worthy of his meat. Again, when he sent forth the seventy, he gave them a similar direction, adding, as 'before, that " the la- borer is worthy of his hire." Paul is full on the subject. " Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth, in all good things." " Let the elders that rule well be count- ed worthy of double honor, especially they who labor in word and doctrine. For the scripture saith, Thou shall not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn : And, The laborer is worthy of his reward."^ " Who goeth a warfare any time, at his * Deut. xii. 19, xiv. 27. See Numbers xviii. 20, 21. Deut. xviii. 19 PARISH AFFAIRS. 183 own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof ? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock ? Say I these things as a man ? or saith not the law the same also ? For it is written in the law of Moses. Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen ? Or saith he it altogether for our sakes ? For our sakes, no doubt this is written : that he that plougheth should plough in hope ; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope- If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things ? Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple ? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar ? Even so hath the Lord ordain- ed that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.' 3 * Matt. x. 711. Luke x. 19. Gal. vi. 6. 1 Tim. v. 17, 1 Cor, ix. 714, 184 PARISH AFFAIRS. The duty being established, the follow- ing are obvious inferences. 1. A minister's salary is not a gratuity, but a just obligation on the people's part. It is that which could not be withheld without injustice, not to say impiety. Of course, each individual, contributing his part, should not say within himself, " I give this," but, " I do it in discharge of an obli- gation." 2. If a minister be entitled to a support at all, he is entitled to a full support. He is entitled to live of the gospel, i. e. to a living, or support. I will not discuss the quantum. If an expensive education, if talents, industry, laboriousness, if moral worth and exclusive devotedness to the public good, were to be made the basis of the calculation, he would be entitled to as good an estate as the same qualities might secure to him in another profession. But the minister's reward is not of this world. It is not in houses and lands, but in crowns of rejoicing in the day of the PARISH AFFAIRS. 185 Lord Jesus. It is not desirable, probably, that he should be rich ; but he ought not to be absolutely poor. " Give me neither poverty nor riches," may the minister say, as well as others. A comfortable support is necessary ; something more than this is reasonable. He should be provided for, not only as long as he is able to preach, but as long as he lives ; and his children also, till they are of an age to be above depen- dence. 3. It is the practice of some to withdraw or keep themselves from any legal connec- tion with ecclesiastical societies, because such connection subjects them to a share in the support of the minister, and other current expenses. Let such reconcile their course as they can with honor, jus- tice, and the Bible. They ought to consid- er that there is both impiety in it towards God, and a threefold injustice as it regards man. It is unjust to their minister, but that is the least consideration ; it is unjust to their neighbors, who, in addition to their 16* 186 PARISH AFFAIRS. own share of the common burthen, are forced to assume that which these delin- quents refuse ; and unjust to themselves and families, who, of all concerned, are in reality the greatest sufferers. 4. We see how much reason there is for the cry of " hireling" against salaried min- isters. This insidious cry is often raised by the infidel and ungodly ; but not ex- clusively by them. It has been too often raised by mistaken (but I hope well mean- ing) Christians. But all the prejudice they can raise is laid at once by common sense and the Bible. Call it ( hire,' if you will : what does the Bible call it ? It says the laborer (meaning the minister,) is worthy of his hire. Let no Christian hold this il- liberal language till he is wiser than his Bible, and would have his minister to be more disinterested than Paul. All denominations of Christians have found it necessary, notwithstanding some experiments to the contrary, in some mode PARISH AFFAIRS. 187 or other, to provide for the support of their ministers. The Presbyterians, Episcopa- lians, and others, do it by fixed salaries. The Methodists support their preachers liberally, but in a manner peculiar to them- selves.* 5. The consequences of the non-fulfilment of this duty. Whatever these may be as they affect the minister, personally, they are more dis- astrous as they affect the people. The *The allowance to a traveling preacher is, for himself $100 and his traveling expenses j for his wife $100 ; for each of his children under seven $16, over that age and under fourteen, $24, annually. Preachers whose wives are dead are allowed for each child a sum sufficient to pay the board of such child, or children, while under the specified age. A house is also to be provided for the family of the preacher, and famished " with at least heavy furniture/ 7 rent free 5 also fuel and table expenses. A house, fuel, and table expenses are to be furnished like- wise for the presiding elder of the district. The support of the preacher does not cease with his actual service. " The allowance of superannuated, worn out, and supernumerary preachers shall be one hundred dollars an- nually. " The annual allowance of the wives of superannuated. 188 PARISH AFFAIRS. minister is a man of like infirmities as oth- ers. He is as naturally cheered or depress- ed, stimulated or disheartened by circum- stances, as other men. And it should be remembered that whatever loss of vivacity, worn out, and supernumerary preachers, shall be one hundred dollars. u The annual allowance of the widows of traveling, superan- nuated, worn out, and supernumerary preachers, shall be one hundred dollars. " The orphans of traveling, supernumerary, superannuated, and worn out preachers, shall be allowed by the annual confe- rences, the same sums respectively, which are allowed to the children of living preachers." Book of Discipline. I quote these things because it is the idea of some that Methodist preachers live on air ; but more especially because some of these provisions, which respect superannuated and worn out preachers, and their dependent offspring, are very commendable, and worthy of the consideration of other de- nominations. As to supernumerary preachers, I presume there are not ma- ny among the Methodists. If there are, the propriety of sup- porting them I should think questionable. The Laborer is wor- thy of his hire<$ but the Bible says nothing about " supernume- raries" men for whom no employment can be found in the vineyard of the Lord. The money for defraying these expenses comes, of course, as it ought, from the people either directly or indirectly. In no denomination are collections more frequently called for. with a view to the support of its preachers, and to other cur- rent expenses. PARISH AFFAIRS. 189 or efficiency, or time, his ministry suffers, in consequence of the people's neglect to provide for him, the loss is eminently theirs. The work of the ministry, his proper work, is to them the most important work in which he can be occupied. If the defi- ciency of a too slender support is to be made up by somebody, it had better be done by them than by him. If I hire a la* borer to do an important work for me, which shall require his exclusive attention, to tend my field, for example, it were better to give him his meals than to com- pel him to earn them elsewhere, at the ex- pense of half his time, Weeds and a starveling crop will tell me so, in the end. A people who are not willing, or not careful, duly to provide for their minister, are not in a state of mind to be much profi- ted by his labors. There is evidence that they do not esteem him very highly in love for his work's sake. They have no right to expect the blessing of God. If it be covetousness, or indiffe- 190 PARISH AFFAIRS. rence, which causes their neglect, these are not the feelings which God approves. We have seen that such neglect is contrary to his requirements. He considers it a wrong done to himself. He has remarka- bly shown himself interested in the just claims of the laborer ; and expresses his indignation at those who withhold their wages. Jas. v. 4. Does God concern himself thus for the wages of the laborer of the field, and is he indifferent to the sus- tenance of his ministers ? Nay, doth God take care for oxen 1 for the faithful labor- ing animal ; and not for his faithful ser- vants who labor for him ? He has called them to their work with a scripture provision before their eyes, of support. If this is withheld, he will take care of his servants, but it will not be for the good of the delinquents. He calls it robbery, a robbing of him ; and declares it to be a reason of his withholding his blessing.* * Mai. iii. 8 10 Compare with Numb, xviii. 20, 21, 31. PARISH AFFAIRS. 191 Finally ; it is no less the interest than it is the duty of the people to support their minister. It is their privilege to do what- ever is necessary to make his ministry among them, unembarrassed, cheerful, and efficient. They can well afford to do this, even in a pecuniary view. There is no de- voted minister who does not benefit even the pecuniary interests of his people great- ly beyond the amount of his stipend. All that his influence does to save them from sin, saves them from that which is more expensive than godliness. Look at the parish which is blest with a faithful minis- ter, and at another whicb is blest with none : compare the sobriety and thrift of the former, with the vices which prevail in the other, its inebriates and idlers, its frol- ics and extravagances, its litigations, and many other tax-levying iniquities, more ex- orbitant than the publicans of old ; and this shall settle the point, that the Chris- tian ministry is worth more, incomparably more, I say, in a pecuniary view, than it costs. 192 PARISH AFFAIRS. But what is it worth in a religious view ? If it hath pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe, and if thus you and your children be saved ; if while you spare something of your tempo- ral substance for the support of your minis- ter, he is instructing you in that wisdom whose fruit is better than gold, and leading you up to an inheritance incorruptible and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, how immeasurably are you the gainer ! How much is received beyond what is given ? And how blind, how miserable the policy, which prefers the incomputable costs and losses of sin, pecuniary and moral, tempo- ral and eternal, to the trifling burthen of a minister's subsistence averaged upon the community ! DIFFERENT MODES OF PROVIDING FOR PAR- ISH EXPENSES. 1. The original mode of raising the Pas- tor's support, in New England, was by tax. Meeting-houses were built, and other par- PARISH AFFAIRS. 193 ish expenses provided for, in the same way. This mode is strictly equitable. Taxa- tion is graduated according to individual ability. It is right that each member of the community, enjoying a common ben- efit, should bear his part of the common burthen according to his means. This principle is so obvious, that it is universal- ly acted on in civil affairs. Any other mode of raising subsidies would occasion a murmur from one extreme of the land to the other. This was the mode originally establish- ed by God himself for the support of reli- gion. Under the Mosaic dispensation, and earlier than that, each man paid his tithes, or tenths ; which was strictly a tax. It was a levy graduated to each person's abil- ity, or means, as our parish rates are. The same principle, or what is equivalent to it, is recognized in the New Testament, (1 Cor. xvi. 2) where each person is re- quired to lay by for the purpose of the gos- 17 194 PARISH AFFAIRS. pel as God hath prospered him; i. e. accord- ing to his ability. For a century and a half there was no objection to this mode in New England, the people being all of one denomination, and sensible enough ,of the importance of religion to be willing to support it. But as the state of society has changed, taxation for the support of the v gospel has met with many obstacles from unreasonable and dis- affected men, and has been laid aside, to a greater or less extent, for other modes. 2. A common mode has been an annual sale, or rent, of pews. This method has one advantage, as it has done away, where it is adopted, the old custom of seating the meeting-house ; a custom which still exists in some places. This was a delicate busi- ness, and too often occasioned unpleasant feelings. It never could have been prac- ticed so long and so amicably by a people less characterized by deference for public order than the descendants of the Pilgrims, is method has also other advantages. PARISH AFFAIRS. 195 By appealing to the selfish principle, it se- cures generally a prompt and cheerful ac- complishment of the object. The money is raised, and every body is, or ought to be, satisfied. It calls the people together, and annually revives their interest in the society's concerns. And it heightens the value of a seat in the house of God, in each man's feelings^ as he has voluntarily paid a sum for it. What is bought is valu- ed ; and especially what is bought in com- petition with others. But this method is not without its faults. It makes no appeal to duty ; or at least makes but a secondary and feeble appeal to it. Its direct appeal, is to selfishness. In that respect its tendency would seem to be bad. The more people are accustomed to be actuated by principle and public spir- it, the better. Appeals to selfishness are soon exhausted ; appeals to duty, never. Again, this method does not distribute burthens equally. A public spirited indi-^ vidual bids off a high-rated seat, or more than one perhaps, for the sake of securing 196 PARISH AFFAIRS. the object, while seven selfish spirits will make a joint-stock business of one, and that a cheap one. There is no mode which is unattended with difficulties. Per- haps this has as few as any. It is not, however, practicable where the seats are held as private property, as in many in- stances they are, this being now the pre- vailing plan of building. 3. A third mode is subscription. This mode is probably destined to be universal. It was practiced by the primitive chris- tians. It is a mode of which there can be no complainers ; unless it should be the most liberal, who, though they have the best right to complain, are the least dis- posed to do so. The evils of this mode appear to be these. It is more precarious than other modes. It encourages the idea of the support of the gospel being a gratui- ty on the part of those who contribute, removing the idea of obligation. It draws upon the generosity of individuals, rather than upon their ability, which is the equi- PARISH AFFAIRS. 197 table principle ; and thus bears unequally on the liberal and the selfish. The obsta- cles it meets with are those which selfish- ness always interposes to the raising of money without the aid of legal constraint ; obstacles which are the greater in the present case, as the call is repeated from year to year, and as many of those who are expected to subscribe, not only love their money too well, but are indifferently affected towards the cause itself for which the subscription is wanted. The idea of a subscription is, of course, that each gives what he pleases. But it should be remembered that the mode of do- ing the thing does not alter the duty. Ev- ery one is bound in duty, and, in honor, to do as much by subscription as he would be required to do by tax. What ! are we such recreants to principle, and honor too, that it shall require the constraint of law to induce us to do our part? This may be c pagan? and it may be ' man? but it is not ' Christian,' nor republican. 17* 198 PARISH AFFAIRS. The result of a subscription commonly, and indeed of most other modes, is, that some do more, and others less, than their just proportion. The former, though not actuated by the motive of the unjust stew- ard, experience the benefit he aimed at. They secure the good will of their fellow men. 'They raise themselves and their families in the estimation of the communi- ty ; and make to themselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness, on earth at least ; and in heaven too, if they are influ- enced by love to Christ. With what meas- ure they mete it shall be measured to them again. The latter have not the conscious- ness of self-respect, and do not escape the pity and censure of others ; though the pity may be silent and the censure unex- pressed. 4. Funds. It has been the policy of many societies to secure the support of the gospel by means of a fund. Funds may be well in certain cases, and to a certain extent : I will not say they are never well. PARISH AFFAIRS. 199 But as a general thing, they are of a doubt- ful expediency. To societies able to do without them they are a positive evil : es- pecially where the fund is sufficient, or nearly sufficient for all expenses. It is a general objection to them that they are at variance with an important principle of human nature. There is a disposition in human nature to value that which is obtained at some expense, or sac- rifice. That which costs nothing is noth- ing valued. God has implanted this feel- ing in our minds, and himself acts with reference to it. He has so ordered our circumstances, that all which we enjoy, and heaven itself, is attained with effort and self-denial. The bounties of his provi- dence are obtained by labor ; and are en- joyed the more because of the labor. The sleep of a laboring man is sweet. He has regarded the same principle in religion. He made the religion of the Jews an expen- sive religion. It had its tithes and offer- ings, and sabbaths, and feast days, in- volving sacrifices of substance and of time: 200 PARISH AFFAIRS. and as long as the people were willing to make these sacrifices for it, it retained its hold on their minds ; but when they sought to get rid of them, and began to rob God in tithes and offerings, declension ensued, and religion gradually perished. The same principle is regarded in the Christian system ; its author having ordained that it should be supported by those who enjoy its privileges. But funds overlook this principle. By making religion cheap, they make it to be cheaply prized. A fund is all the while teaching the lesson, and making the im- pression, that sacrifices are not to be made for the gospel, at least not habitually ; and out of this ere long grows the impression that it is not worth such sacrifices : and if it be not worth the pecuniary sacrifices, it will not long be worth the time and atten- tion which it requires. I do not doubt that parish funds have been often raised and given from very pious motives, and that the pious dead are now reaping the rewards of such acts of PARISH AFFAIRS. 201 beneficence and proofs of love to the cause of Christ. But in too many instances I fear the motives are rather those of selfish- ness and impatience of religious burthens than those of enlightened piety. The sup- port of religion is a tax which the people are willing to get rid of. It is to be per- manently provided for, if possible, by means of some pious bequest, a spirited subscrip- tion entered into once for all, a lottery, or some other expedient. A feeling is betray- ed like that of an old colored domestic, who being impatient of family prayers, used to say, " Come, let us go in to pray- ers, and have it over and done with." A people released by a fund from giving for the support of religion, soon become confirmed in the habit of not giving, and such a habit is poverty itself. As an ex- ample of this, I am acquainted with a so- ciety which was formerly able to erect an expensive meeting-house, and to support its minister with a handsome salary, and which is as populous now and as abundant in means as it then was, and probably 202 PARISH AFFAIRS. more so ; but having been blest with a fund for some fifteen or twenty years, it is become so poor as to have voted, that " the fund money," which is less than the minis- ter's salary, is all they can raise. Alas ! what would become of them if their fund should fail ? Of course, a missionary agent, " begging for money," can hardly be welcomed there ; for how can they do for others who cannot do for themselves ? A fund, when adequate to all the wants of the society, dispenses with the action of the people. Where there is no fund the question is whether to have the gospel or not. It comes up to every mind. It is a topic of conversation. It calls the society together for joint counsel and co-operation. This is of great benefit. It keeps alive the interest. Its effect is specially good on the young men, who as they successively come forward to manhood, are called on to act in the counsels and sustain the inter- ests of the endeared community to which they belong. A fund naturally abates the mutual inter- PARISH AFFAIRS. 203 est of minister and people. This may be said without impeachment of the feelings or motives of either party. Such is our nature. When a minister sees his people making efforts from year to year to sustain him, it is a different thing to his feelings from receiving the cold avails of a fund. It is a different thing to the people. They love him more and profit more by his la- bors, while they are actively concerned for his welfare, and can feel that they thus en- title themselves to his affectionate regard. And this is among the reasons for a peo- ple supporting their minister ; and should stand for an argument on that head. It is desirable that they should, duty out of the question. It is sometimes advanced that the church alone ought to support the gos- pel, without calling upon the unconverted. It ought, if it must. But so long as the unconverted are willing to contribute to the object, they ought to be called on, as one of the best means of interesting them in it. That it is their duty to contribute cannot be questioned ; and if it be their 204 PARISH AFFAIRS. privilege also, as it certainly is, it is not ex- pedient, if it be morally right, to withhold it from them. There is a moral influence connected with giving for religious objects, which appears to me to entitle it to an es- sential place among the means of bringing men to Christ. A fund is liable to be lost. Then dis- couragement ensues. The society, like a rich heir made poor, comes to the ground . without its accustomed means, and without the habit of supporting itself. It cannot dig : to beg it is ashamed. However, such a catastrophe commonly proves to be more startling than ruinous. I do not doubt that the loss of their funds would be the best thing that could happen to many churches. Instead of indolently reposing upon their much goods laid up for many years, they would then place their reliance, as they ought, upon God and their own exertions ; and would begin to know a prosperity, which they had not known for years. Instead of lying secure- ly and supinely, like soldiers in a fort, they PARISH AFFAIRS. P*J ^05 would set up their banners in God's name, and go forth to action. Action is essential to life. But there must be a necessity for action, or such is man's sloth he will not act. Hence the little spirituality, as a general thing, of rich churches. The luke- warm Laodiceans it would seem were rich as to their worldly resources ; for " thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing," says Jesus in his message to them ; while the church in Smyrna, which he commends without rebuke, appears to have been poor; " I know thy works, and tribulation, and POVERTY (but thou art rich) &c." So the churches of Macedonia of their " deep pov- erty" abounded in spiritual things. I do not say that poverty is a desirable thing in itself ; but it is less an enemy to grace, than great wealth laid up in funds.* * When a certain bank failed, a few years since, in Connec- ticut, and carried down with it the treasured funds of a large number of ecclesiastical societies, may not the designed de- struction of those funds have been among the providential rear 18 206 PARISH AFFAIRS. None are supinely good : with toil and pain, And various arts, the steep ascent we gain. It is among the evils of funds, that they give an undue influence to unworthy and wicked persons. They are a public bonus, thrown among the many, in the disposal of which the veriest heathen in the place has as loud a voice as the most worthy in- habitant. They give such persons a con- sequence in society which they never would purchase for themselves by their own liberality and public spirit. They sometimes give them an afflicting control over the society. Viewed as an instru- ment of power, they are a temptation to wicked men ; who if they can find means to get a legal possession of them, are little concerned about moral right. I could men- tion an instance of a society and it is but one among many which might be mention- sons of the failure of the institution ? Were not those funds the Jonah of the ship ? And how is it with those societies now ? Are the}' not more vigorous, and more blest than they were before ? PARISH AFFAIRS. 207 ed where a party, enlarging itself with all the wicked that could be induced to join it, was able by its majority of votes to control the fund and house, and appro- priate them to a most unworthy deposed man (to say no worse of him,) for a series of years; a thing which never would have been done, had the support of their pseudo- minister depended upon the purses of those who employed him, and not upon the be- quests of the pious dead. Finally ; funds are liable to be perverted. In how many instances are they now em- ployed for the support of heresies, in this and other countries ? Guard them as you will, experience has shown it to be difficult to secure them from perversion. I do not suppose that all the evils which I have mentioned, and others which might be mentioned, exist in every case. Per- haps in many instances none of them are experienced*. The evils are, of course, modified by circumstances by the manner in which funds are constituted, by their 208 PARISH AFFAIRS. amount, and by the habits of the people. As a general thing however, the objections appear to be well founded. As a means of supporting the gospel, funds, then, do not appear to be the mode which is either best adapted to the nature of man, or most consonant to the will of God. They are of doubtful efficacy to hold societies together, and to perpetuate religion. They operate through selfish- ness, which is itself an enemy to the cause. The more selfishness is fostered in ,the support of religion, the more certain it is that religion will eventually fail. It is not selfishness, or the bonds of selfishness, that can hold men together in a healthful reli- gious capacity. It must be principle that does this, Principle, and a living, active interest, with looking to God, are infinitely better than funds. And it seems to me preposterous, that one generation should think to discharge the duties of all posterity. God never de- signed this. Has he not made it as much the duty and privilege of one generation to PARISH AFFAIRS. 209 support the gospel as of another, as much our children's as ours ? We cannot dis- charge them from the duty, we ought not to deprive them of the privilege. And, es- pecially, if funds be attended with so many evils, as we have seen, we ought not to be- queath those evils to our children. 5. Sabbath Collections. It is the prac- tice of some congregations, (though of very few In New England) to have collections every Sabbath for the support of the gos- pel. To this mode the following seem to be objections. 1. The amount of such collections is generally small. 2. They induce a habit of giving little, instead of liberal sums, the plates being filled with cents and sixpences. An agent of one of our great benevolent institutions remarked, that he found this to be the fact, generally, where this method was in use. 3. They operate to keep some from the house of God. 4. They take up considerable time, and necessarily divert the minds of the congregation, in some degree, from the 18* 210 PARISH AFFAIRS. sacred exercises to which they have been attending. However, I would not discourage any practicable mode of supporting the gospel ; and in some places this may be the best. MEETING HOUSES AND LECTURE ROOMS. Religion itself being not naturally agree- able, should be aided with whatever at- tractive accompaniments it innocently may; and, next to an acceptable preacher, noth- ing more invites people to its public assem- blies, or elevates their feelings more, than a beautiful house. God himself has re- garded this principle. He has shown it in the expressive and beautiful language of the Bible ; in the splendor of the temple ; in the attractive and even exhilarating ar- rangements of Jewish festivals ; and in many ways. Congregationalists have been behind no denomination in the number, commodious- ness, and good taste of their church edifi- ces. It may almost be said that the trav- PARISH AFFAIRS. 211 eler in New England is never out of sight of one or more of their spires. But the zeal of the sons has not always equalled the liberality of the fathers. There are occasionally seen houses which from their ancient and neglected appearance might be imagined to have belonged to a by-gone religion, as well as by-gone age. They seem to stand as a mouldering me- morial of the piety that was, and a mourn- ful emblem of that which is, decayed and yet decaying. It is in vain for a people to profess a lively regard for religion while they show no concern for the beauty of its temple. Neither God nor man is likely to perceive it. God reproves such neglect.* Societies often imagine themselves too poor to build a new house. It is a great mistake. They are in reality too poor to endure with the old one ; for nothing tends so much to indifference, and lean congre- gations, as a gloomy or comfortless house. Hagg 212 PARISH AFFAIRS. If you wish to encourage the growth of other denominations at the expense of your own, let your old house stand while they build new ones. A society commonly finds itself surpri- singly increased in ability and vigor in consequence of erecting a new house of worship. By awaking its long slumbering public spirit to the holy and delightful en- terprise, by mustering its resources, and interesting many who before were indiffe- rent, or not known to the society as mem- bers, it has found itself, at the conclusion of the enterprise, with increased numbers and diminished burthens. The effort that threatened to exhaust its resources, has greatly increased them. All feel a new impulse. The preacher is more animated, the congregation larger and more attentive, and a new respect is felt for the sanctity of God's house and worship. The lecture room also, as well as the church, should be made cheerful and at- tractive. It should be well warmed in PARISH AFFAIRS. 213 winter and well aired in summer, and well lighted. A meeting, especially in the evening, suffers more than most people are aware by being held in a dim and cavern- like room ; where only a lamp or two dim- ly illumines the locks of the speaker, whose hearers abide in darkness. We are by na- ture strongly affected by the scenery about us. The cold, the gloomy, the dark, the cheerful and bright, the silent and the stir- ring, impart their qualities to our feelings. The children of this world understand this ; and it is one of the things in which they are practically wiser than the children of light. How does the ball room surpass the lecture room, and the theater the church for brilliancy of illumination ? The primitive Christians, poor and distressed, and few as they were, gave the cheerful- ness of bright lights to their meetings. When Paul was preaching at Troas, " there were many lights in the upper chamber in which they were gathered to- gether." 214 P.ARISH AFFAIRS. FREE SEATS. y Though there should be a few free seats, perhaps, in every house of worship, it is not desirable that they should all be free. Besides that it is not agreeable to most people to sit promiscuously, it is desirable on many accounts that each family should have its own pew. They can then be seated together, the children with the pa- rents ; and can go to the house of God se- cure of the seat they are to occupy, with- out the care and embarrassment of finding one on each occasion. God himself, in all his institutions, has paid great regard to the family relation, and we ought not to do otherwise in our arrangements for public worship. But while it is not desirable that the house should be open for an entirely pro- miscuous occupancy, there ought to prevail a most liberal spirit of accommodation to- wards all who may wish for room. It is unreasonable and wicked that any family PARISH AFFAIRS. 215 should be excluded from the house of God so long as there is a single slip whose oc- cupants could make room for more. \ SECULAR USE OF CHURCHES. It has been a practice with Congrega- tionalists, to some extent, to open their meeting-houses for other purposes than those which are religious. The practice originated perhaps in the desire which our fathers had, in common with other puritans and reformers, to discountenance that ex- treme superstitious regard which Catholics were wont to pay to consecrated places ; and also in the fact that their civil af- fairs were closely blended with those of religion. How far the practice may be justifiable in the view of others I cannot say ; but to me it has seemed desirable that it should be discontinued. There is a certain feeling of respect for sacred places and things which is not su- perstitious, but natural and proper ; and 216 PARISH AFFAIRS. which it is desirable to preserve and cher- ish, but which the practice in question is calculated to destroy. The principle of as- sociation must necessarily operate in this as in other cases. When we enter a theater, or a senate-chamber, the very walls tell us of the things transacted there. When we enter a church our associations with the place should be naturally and only reli- gious : but if within those walls we have witnessed the strifes of a warm political election, or town meeting, or have seen the pulpit occupied by a political orator, we can hardly exclude such things from our recollection. I cannot help thinking that thus to fa- miliarize people to all sorts of uses of the house of God has a tendency to make them less scrupulous about their behavior in it ; and less scrupulous as to the persons who shall be allowed to enter it as preachers. To day God is worshipped in it, and Christ is preached ; to-morrow it is the place of some secular transaction ; and the day following it is, without much compunc- PARISH AFFAIRS. 217 tion, made to accommodate some minister of heresy. If these, and such like, are to be the allowed uses of the edifice, they had better be mentioned in the act of dedica- tion, and the house be dedicated to God, the town, and other objects. There seems to be inconsistency, if not irreverence, to dedicate it to God, and call it his, and then make it as common to other uses as to his worship. I would by no means encourage a super- stitious reverence for w r ood and stone ; nor would I object to as liberal a use of our churches as may be consistent with the professed design of their erection. To open them to objects which, though not strictly religious, are obviously related and subservient to religion, may be admissible ; but beyond this their use is questionable. God has said, "Ye shall reverence my sanctuary." Christ was offended at the secular concerns which he found within the precincts of the temple, and drove them out. 19 218 PARISH AFFAIRS. Civil communities, as such, have no right to claim the use of our churches. They are able, and should be willing, to provide buildings for their own purposes. PARSONAGES AND LIBRARIES. As a society will always want a minister, and the minister will want a house, it were well if every society would own a parson- age. It is often difficult for a minister to rent a house, and embarrassing to build. If he depends on renting one, he can occu- py it only so long as may suit the conve- nience of the proprietor. He moves about a tenant at will. That he should be obli- ged to build, in these times, is hardly rea- sonable. For it is not improbable, dismis- sions being now so lamentably common, that by the time he has completed the building, having exhausted his narrow re- sources upon it, and more, perhaps, he is obliged to leave it to stand empty, or else to part with it at a sacrifice by means of a forced sale. PARISH AFFAIRS. 219 It is obvious that a society can more easily furnish a house for its minister than he can for himself. Indeed the society can do it with little difficulty and consider- able advantage. The use of the place will in part support the pastor ; SQ that less will have to be raised in money. And by being the known family residence of the minister, it becomes, like the meeting- house itself, a common object of attach- ment, and a bond of union to the people. If, in addition to the parsonage, the peo- ple would create a library for the use of their pastor, they would do themselves a further service as v well as him. Most min- isters find themselves unable, after the large expenses of their education, to pro- cure for themselves near as many books as it i$ desirable, and almost indispensable, they should have. In what way could their hearers better appropriate a moderate sum, annually, than to aid them in this ob- ject ; since the excellence of a preacher's library cannot fail to- add to the richness of his instructions ? 220 PARISH AFFAIRS. The books should be placed in a distinct case, and deposited with the pastor for his exclusive use, so long as he continues with the society ; and should then go to his successor. THE YOUNG MEN. Young men, as one of their first acts, on coming of age, should become members in form, of the ecclesiastical society, or, where more than one exists, of some one of them. I will not urge this on the ground of their worldly advancement : though I might do this ; for there is no more favorable intro- duction of a young man to the notice and esteem of the community : but I urge the nobler plea of citizenship and duty. Not coming forward to act as citizens, they might as well be minors still, they are mi- nors as it Regards society. They often keep back from modesty ; or from not knowing the mode of becoming members. The requisite information may easily be obtained by inquiry. CHAPTER IX. RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE OF CHURCHES WITH ONE ANOTHER. THE churches are equal, as well as min- isters and members. This equality is re- cognized in their mutual dismission and re- ception of members, in associations, coun- cils, and other forms of intercourse.* DISMISSION OF MEMBERS FROM ONE CHURCH TO ANOTHER. Members proposing to transfer their re- lation from one church to another receive letters of dismission and recommendation to that effect. When a member goes to reside in anoth- er place for a season only, expecting to re- * See Camb. Plat, chapter xv. on the communion of church- es with one another. 19* 222 INTERCOURSE turn, and not choosing to dissolve his ex- isting connection, he receives a letter cer- tifying his membership and good standing, and commending him to the fellowship of the church where he goes to reside, for the time being. For an example of such a certificate, or letter of introduction, see Romans xvi. 1, 2. Also 2 Cor. iii. 1 ; Acts xviii. 27. If the member dismissed is not received by the sister church, he remains connected as he was, and his letter of dismission is void. " The church cannot make a mem- ber no member, except by excommunica- tion."* And here let us observe f ,he importance of good faith in this business, on the part of the dismissing church. No church should dismiss and recommend to another as in good standing a member who in real- ity is not so, or ought not to be so consider- ed. If he be a member under qensure, or justly liable to it, let him be retained and * Camb. Plat. OF CHURCHES. 223 properly dealt with, till by his amendment he shall be worthy of the fellowship to which we recommend him, or else be ex- communicated. Why should one church be unwittingly burthened with the disor- derly members of another ? whom they must either discipline, or bear the oppro- brium of their names. The tendency of such a procedure, besides its other mis- chiefs, is, to destroy the mutual confidence of the churches. The church also to which we dismiss a member must be a church in good stand- ing. How can we commend a disciple of Christ to the fellowship of heretics ! a be- liever in Christ to the communion of those who deny the Lord that bought them ! Or how can we commend one striving to keep himself pure, to the watch and care of them that are corrupt ! For the same reason, we cannot dismiss a member to the world. A member is not at liberty to withdraw himself from the church to which he be- 224 INTERCOURSE longs, without its consent, whether to join some other church, or to return again to the world. If a member wishes to transfer his rela- tion to another church, for good reasons, (of which he must ordinarily be the judge,) the church cannot, consistently with usage and propriety, refuse his request. But " if his departure be manifestly un- safe and sinful, the church may not con- sent thereunto ; for in so doing, they should not act in faith, and should partake with him in his sin. If the case be doubtful, and the person not to be persuaded, it seemeth best to leave the matter unto God, and not forcibly to detain him."* If in any case a Church declines recei- ving a member dismissed to it from anoth- er, it ought to apprise that church of the fact, and assign its reasons. Every church has an acknowledged right to examine those whom it receives by letter, in the same manner as it examines * Camb. Platform. OF CHURCHES. 225 those who are received on profession. But this is not generally practiced. Nor is it generally desirable. It would imply a want of confidence in a sister church, whose written testimony (unless it is known or supposed to be unfaithful or cor- rupt) should be sufficient. Some churches however are so circumstanced as to ren- der such examination necessary. In such cases it is well to make it general, for the sake of avoiding invidious distinctions. No member of a church should perma- nently change his residence from one par- ish, or part of the country, to another, without taking a regular letter of dismis- sion. This is due to all concerned. As a professor of religion, he is bound always to maintain a responsible connection with some particular church ; and be subject to its watch and discipline. This is too often neglected. It is a sub- ject of growing complaint in our churches ; and some of them, in order to remedy it, have very properly adopted a rule, that no person coming from abroad, and neglecting 226 INTERCOURSE to bring such letter, shall be admitted to their communion, after a certain time. COUNCILS. Councils are the representative bodies of the churches. They are composed of ministers and laymen, each church send- ing a delegate with its pastor, and are con* vened usually from churches of the same neighborhood, or district, but sometimes from places more remote. The occasions on which councils are called are such as these : the gathering of churches ; the ordination, dismission, or deposition, of ministers; troublesome cases of discipline, dissentions, or other difficul- ties in a church, which the church itself is unable, or indisposed, to settle ; and in general, all those occasions which require the advice, or concurrent action, of more churches than one. They are convened by " letters missive," as they are termed ; which are addressed to the moderator, in the case of a consocia- OF CHURCHES. tion being called, and to the churches sev- erally, in the case of a select council. The letters state the subject matter on which the advice or action of the council is want- ed ; and it confines itself to that business. Councils convened for the adjustment of difficulties are termed mutual and ex-parte. Mutual councils suppose the existence of two parties who agree to refer the matter between them to a council ; each choosing an equal number of the churches compo- sing it, with an additional church chosen jointly by the parties if it be thought expe- dient. An ex-parte council is a council called by one of the parties, the other not concurring. In this case the letters mis- sive are sent in the name of the party con- cerned ; in other cases, in the name of the church ; in the case of an ordination, in the name of the church and society. In Connecticut, where the churches, with some exceptions,* are consociated, they have standing councils, called consociations. * About ten or twelve. 228 * INTERCOURSE A consociation comprises the churches of a county, or, in the larger counties, half the county ; tfiose few churches being except- ed which prefer not to be consociate