L^V. ^///1<^K2& ,- ; HER OF THE DIAN ARMY COLONEL J. BIDDULPH ;AN STAFF COP R NINETEENTH AND THEIR T ALBEMARL STRINGER LAWRENCE THE FATHER OF THE INDIAN ARMY BY COLONEL J. BIDDULPH INDIAN STAFF CORPS AUTHOR OF " THE NINETEENTH AND THEIR TIMES " LONDON JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET 1901 MORSE STEPHENS oua. CONTENTS PREFACE CHAPTER I. FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA Indian Warfare From Trade to War Lawrence takes service with the Company Arrival in India Beginnings of our Indian Army French repulse at Cuddalore Boscawen's expedition Siege of Pondicherry Lawrence taken prisoner Failure of siege Expedition against Devicotah Repulse of Cope Lawrence takes command Fall of Devicotah Joins Nazir Jung d'Auteuil's bluff Lawrence at Fort St. David Discontent Resigns the service Appointed Commander-in-Chief n CHAPTER II. TRICHINOPOLY Return to India March to Trichinopoly Dalton Clive Clive's Peril Dalton and d'Auteuil Clive and d'Auteuil Law's surrender Death of Chunda Sahib Dupleix's accusation Kinneer's repulse Lawrence at Fort St. David Victory at Bahoor Relinquishes command ... 30 CHAPTER III. TRICHINOPOLY Lawrence at Trivadi Dalton's difficulties Lawrence marches to Trichinopoly Attacks Astruc Desperate position Battle of the Golden Rock Action with Brenier Kil- patrick Victory over Astruc Weycondah French attack on Trichinopoly Dupleix's terms Failure of negotiations Grenville's disaster Mahomed Yusuf Poniapa's treachery Caillaud Lawrence and Maissin Suspension of arms Ruin of Dupleix Treaty of peace 53 6 CONTENTS CHAPTER IV. DEFENCE OF MADRAS War with France Caillaud outwits d'Auteuil Adlercron His incapacity Lawrence as a Volunteer Siege of Fort St. George Draper's sortie Siege raised Lawrence at Con- jeveram Returns to England Returns to India Mahomed Yusufs rebellion Last Years in India Lawrence's death His character Relations with Clive Monument 96 APPENDIX A : Parentage of Stringer Lawrence . . .121 APPENDIX B : Soobadars of the Deccan, and Nawabs of the Carnatic, in the eighteenth century 123 PREFACE THE object of this Memoir is to rescue from oblivion the name of a soldier to whom the British Empire owes a great debt of gratitude. We have been so long accustomed to consider ourselves as the only European nation in India, that it is apt to be forgotten how great was French predominance, in that country, in the middle of the eighteenth century. When Lawrence went to India, with no higher commission than to command a small undisciplined garrison of two or three hundred men, our tenure in India hung by a thread. With few troops and scanty resources, under conditions of warfare novel to him, Lawrence gave check to the ambitious schemes of Dupleix, established the prestige of English arms, and secured time for the English Ministry to recog- nise the importance of the unofficial war that was being waged by the East India Company against 8 PREFACE France. Lawrence was the second and the most distinguished of the little band of English officers whose services were transferred from the Crown to the Company, and who wrote their names so deeply in the history of our earlier wars in India. He was also the first English Commander-in-Chief in India. Nor was Lawrence's merit confined to his services in the field. By his good judgment, unfailing common sense and uprightness of character, he secured the confidence of his masters in England and of his colleagues in India to a degree that no others of his time were able to attain. Alone among his contemporaries, he stands distin- guished as the only man in a prominent posi- tion whom no voice of dislike or malice ever assailed. Some account of his operations round Trichi- nopoly has been given by Lawrence himself; but with characteristic modesty he has told his story so briefly as almost to deprive it of interest. Orme's history contains a detailed account of Lawrence's campaigns, but they are intermingled with such a mass of details in which Lawrence was not concerned, that Lawrence's own personality is lost sight of. The dates given in this Memoir, up to PREFACE 9 3rd September, 1752, are according to Old Style. The tables of the rulers of the Deccan and the Carnatic, in the eighteenth century, given in Appendix, serve to show how the appointed Governors first became indepen- dent of Delhi, and, in time, founded lines of hereditary rulers. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS MAJOR-GENERAL STRINGER LAWRENCE, after the Portrait by SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS . Frontispiece. TRICHINOPOLY to face p. 34 TEMPLE OF SERINGH AM .... to face p. 42 DUPLEIX to face p. 94 LAWRENCE'S MONUMENT IN WESTMIN- STER ABBEY to face p. 119 MAP OF ENVIRONS OF TRICHINOPOLY , at the end. STRINGER LAWRENCE i. FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA IN these days when the most trifling skir- mish is telegraphed to all parts of the world, when the distribution of medals and rewards is discussed before a campaign is ended, it is somewhat difficult to realise the small notice that has been taken of some of the men who laid the foundations of our Indian Empire in the eighteenth century. Clive and Coote have found their niche in the temple of Fame ; but, besides them, there were a number of officers, not inferior to them in military achievement, who, as majors and captains, often only as subalterns, commanded armies in the field, won important victories, conducted sieges, and carried on successful operations during a long series of years, generally against superior numbers, always under great difficulties, whose names 12 FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA have almost passed into oblivion : " stout- hearted but utterly forgotten Englishmen, who, at great odds and with small means, sustained the fortunes of their country in many a hazardous predicament by their devoted bravery and steadfast perseverance." Some of their deeds have been chronicled by Orme ; but Orme is only to be read by the few. Without some personal knowledge of India he cannot be read to much advantage. There is no skimming or dipping into Orme. His long-drawn narrative of fifteen years' warfare, diffused and mono- tonous, merges its interest in a multiplicity of personages and details among which all sense of proportion is lost. The enemies against whom our armies contended were no contemptible foes. In statesmanship and far-reaching views there was nobody in authority on the English side who could match Dupleix, while he was in India. He was, through the greater part of his career, well supported by his own Govern- ment, and wielded resources that his English opponents never commanded. Fortunately he was no soldier. La Bourdonnais, Bussy and Lally were excellent generals. They were less hampered by their own local Government than were the English commanders, who were con- INDIAN WARFARE 13 tinually subjected to vexatious interference in military details. The French troops were more numerous and better equipped than the English. The native commanders pitted against us were frequently bad, though Hyder Ali was as fine a military leader as India has ever produced ; but the numbers and resources they could bring into the field made them very formidable. The fighting was often of a most desperate nature. If there was any superiority of arms it was not on our side. The native chiefs had strong fortresses, powerful trains of artillery, and thou- sands of horsemen, against which our people were obliged to match themselves with slow- moving infantry and a few field pieces drawn by oxen. Sepoys were enlisted and disciplined by the French, before the idea was taken up by the English. Our Sepoys, at first, had only such weapons as they could themselves furnish ; sometimes only bows and arrows, and spears. It was not till the end of 1754 that the first regiment of the British army landed in India. Before that date, the Company had to depend on the sweepings of the English sea- ports, gathered by sharks and crimps ; for they were not allowed to recruit openly. Orme describes a newly-arrived batch in 1752, the i 4 FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA very men with whom Clive took Covelong and Chingleput, as being "as usual, the refuse of the vilest employments in London."* Some- times Swiss mercenaries were obtained, who deserted wholesale and enlisted in the French ranks. Such one-sided combats as the superior armaments of our day have rendered possiblef never fell to the lot of our armies in India in the eighteenth century. Our successes in India were largely due to the fine qualities of our subordinate officers when entrusted with de- tached commands. This was where the inferi- ority of the French showed itself. Equal to us on other points, and our superiors in many, their subordinate officers proved themselves markedly inferior to the English, when con- fronted with unexpected difficulties, or when acting independently. Nor did French officers succeed in developing the best qualities of their * Qive, in 1758, writes with reference to the King's intention to give him a Colonel's commission : " I shall never make any use of it, for I am not at all inclined to enter the lists with Monsieur Lally. Experience, discipline and perhaps bravery would be against me. For you well know the men which come to India are the worst of their kind, and surely the best men of France are equal to the worst men of England." f On the 8th May, 1866, at Irdjar, a Russian force of about 3,000 men defeated 40,000 Bokhara troops, having only 12 men wounded, FROM TRADE TO WAR 15 Sepoys, to the same degree that English officers were able to do. While our regular forces were engaged in Germany and America, our first successes in India were, to a great extent, won by our waifs and strays, by the younger sons of younger sons, the failures and ne'er-do- weels who went to India in search of a career that they were unable to find at home. The capture of Madras by the French, in September, 1746, was the beginning of our military career in India. At that time, the few European soldiers in the East India Company's service were merely factory guards, with little organisation and less discipline. After nearly one hundred and fifty years of existence, the Company was still a purely trading association ; trade, not territory, was their object, and they had steadily kept aloof from interference in local politics. The declaration of war, by France, found the Companies of both nations equally unprepared for hostilities. On the appearance of an English squadron, under Commodore Barnet, off the Coromandel Coast, in 1745, Dupleix, the French Governor of Pondicherry, prevailed on the Nawab of the Carnatic to prohibit hostilities, and Barnet sailed away. 16 FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA 1746. The English Company, secure in the Nawab's assurance that he would force the French to observe a similar neutrality, took no precautions to strengthen themselves. When, therefore, a French squadron, under La Bourdonnais, appeared off Madras, in September, 1746, no resistance was possible. Dupleix had secured the neutrality of the Nawab, by promising to put him in possession of Madras, and the place fell after two days' bombardment. The garrison, at that time, consisted only of some 200 Europeans fit for duty and about three thousand Peons, less than a third of whom were armed with muskets. The officers were three lieutenants, two of whom were foreigners, and seven ensigns promoted from the ranks. Only one lieutenant and one ensign were deemed efficient officers. The Nawab, as soon as he found that Dupleix was playing him false, and had no intention of surrendering Madras to him, sent his son, Mahfoos Khan, with ten thousand men to expel the French. The French, under M. Paradis, inflicted a bloody defeat on the Nawab's army, at S. Thome, six weeks after the capture of Madras from the English, which practically made Dupleix dictator of the 1746. FIRST APPOINTMENT 17 Carnatic. A few weeks later he succeeded in making terms with the Nawab, and was left in peace to prosecute his plans against the English. The Directors in London, thinking only of trade, took no steps to strengthen Madras till after it had fallen. Major Knipe, the commander of the Fort St. George garrison, had died in May, 1 743 ; after much delay Captain Stringer Lawrence was selected to succeed him. Little is known of Lawrence's parentage.* He was the son of John Lawrence and Mary his wife, of Hereford, where he was born on the 24th February, 1697-8. In December, 1727, he received a commission, as ensign, in Major-General Clayton's regiment, now the West Yorkshire, and saw service with that regiment in Spain and Flanders, and during the Highland rising of 1745. He became a lieutenant in March, 1735-6, captain in June, 1745, and retired on 20th January, 1746-7. The circumstances under which his services were transferred to the East India Company are not known ; but it was not till the Company had agreed to employ him that his name ceased to appear on the rolls of Clayton's regiment. * See Appendix. C i8 FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA 1747. According to the record of the Directors' Proceedings for i ;th December, 1 746, it was " Resolved that the garrison of Fort St. George be strengthened with a number of recruits, sergeants, and ensigns, and that an able officer be sent from hence, as Major thereof, at the salary of ,250 per annum and one hundred guineas for his charges out. And Captain Lawrence being recommended as a person qualified for the post, Resolved by the Ballot that the said Captain Lawrence be appointed Major of the Garrison on the terms above mentioned, and, being called in, he was acquainted therewith." On the i8th February following, when he was forty-nine years of age, he took the usual oath, and sailed in the Winchelsea. His appointment was notified to the Governor of Madras in the following terms : " Stringer Lawrence, Esq., is enter- tained by us to be Major of our Garrison at Fort St. George upon the same terms as Major Knipe, viz. : two hundred and fifty pounds sterling per annum and one of the Companies." About one hundred and fifty men embarked at the same time. It is noteworthy that the views of the Directors, at that time, were limited to strengthening the Fort St. George garrison. 1748. ARRIVAL IN INDIA 19 The idea of using troops in the field, or for any other purpose than defending their own walls, had never entered their minds. Four months after Lawrence's departure the news of the fall of Madras reached London. The English at Madras having all been taken prisoners, the Directors appointed a new governor, and a Council, of which Lawrence was made the third member ; but it was ordered that his work in the Council was to be confined to military advice and duties. Lawrence's voyage lasted nearly eleven months. For some reason his ship went to Batavia, before making the Coromandel coast. Probably they received news of the fall of Madras at the Cape, and went to Batavia to await further intelligence. In January, 1748, Lawrence landed at Fort St. David, then momentarily expecting an attack by the French. After the fall of Madras, the Fort St. David officials had taken on themselves the administration of the Com- pany's affairs on the coast. Very little was then wanting to deprive the English of their last foothold in Southern India. Two attacks, since the fall of Madras, had been foiled rather than defeated. Lawrence's first care was to C 2 20 FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA 1748. form a camp outside the walls. This led to the detection of a plot among the native officers of Peons, who were in secret correspondence with Dupleix. The presence of the English fleet on the coast prevented any French movement against the place for a time. Lawrence employed the interval in reorgan- ising the companies of Europeans, and intro- ducing a system of military law. The reorgan- ised companies were seven in number, con- sisting each of one captain, one lieutenant, one ensign, four sergeants, four corporals, three drummers, and seventy privates. The lieu- tenant of Lawrence's company was called captain-lieutenant, and ranked as a captain. In the field, these companies acted together as a battalion, but ten years elapsed before they were formed into an administrative battalion in quarters. In the same way, the Peons were organised in companies, and, eleven years later, in battalions. It was in such humble begin- nings that the Anglo-Indian army had its origin. Six months after Lawrence's arrival, Dupleix took advantage of the absence of the British squadron to make another attempt against Cud- dalore. By a sudden march, a force of eight 1748. CUDDALORE 21 hundred Europeans and one thousand Sepoys, from Pondicherry, appeared within three miles of Cuddalore on the morning of the i7th June. Lawrence had intelligence of the design, and ostentatiously withdrew the guns and garrison to Fort St. David, about a mile distant, giving out that he did not consider Cud- dalore tenable. Directly night fell, he marched back the garrison and guns. At midnight the French advanced with scaling ladders, and were received with such a fire of grape and musketry that they flung down their arms and retreated precipitately to Pondicherry without making any further attempt. Two months later, Lawrence was involved in a disaster of the same nature as he had inflicted on the French. On receipt of the news of the loss of Madras, the Directors in London were roused to action. Being devoid of military resources, their appli- cation to the Crown for assistance met with a ready response. An expedition, against Pondi- cherry, was fitted out under Admiral Boscawen, and sailed from England in November, 1747. For the purposes of the expedition, twelve independent companies, each of one hundred rank and file, were formed by drafts from 22 FIRST SERVICE IN INDIA 1748. different regiments, A force of artillery was added, and the whole force consisted of about 1,400 men. Some time was wasted in an abor- tive attempt against Mauritius. On the 29th July, the squadron arrived off Fort St. David : the troops were landed, and, on 8th August, began their march to Pondicheny, The whole of the operations by land and sea were in Boscawen's hands, and the miscarriage of affairs was ascribed to his ignorance of land warfare. With marines, sailors, and a Dutch contingent from Negapatam, the European rank and file amounted to 3,720 men. Lawrence's authority only extended to the Company's troops, which formed a fifth of the whole force, not counting Sepoys. The first attempt was made against Arian- copang, a detached fort two miles from Pondi- cherry. Without information, without recon- naissance, and without scaling ladders, seven hundred men were marched to the attack, with the inevitable consequences. One hundred and fifty men were killed or wounded, the best officer among the English troops being among the killed, without the slightest advantage being gained. It was found necessary to commence regular siege operations against Ariancopang. 1748. TAKEN PRISONER 23 After much blundering, a battery was opened with very little effect. M. Law, who com- manded in Ariancopang, made a sudden sortie, with a mixed force of infantry and cavalry, against a part of the entrenchment held by sailors. The sailors were struck with panic at the sight of the cavalry, and fled. The panic communicated itself to the regular troops, and the whole of the entrenchment was abandoned. Lawrence, who commanded in the trenches that day, disdained to fly, and was made prisoner. The same day the magazine in the fort was blown up by accident, forcing the garrison to retreat into Pondicherry. On the 3upleix were on one effort more on he wealth of India w u Fran ^Itru, in h Duple defeat of Law in 1752 that 1 effect on Dupleix's career, by destroying his credit -in France. All his previous serv were at mo; to D Lav Sahib's ab;, de him a better candidate the Nawabship th lomed Aii. his death, Dupleix failed tc claimant to the Carnatic throne, under e< whose name he could prosecute his randisement, till he was prepared v> f - 'U; :^ r :. '^ * . J ^ s - - : r^tL'T? : i ^ : ^i " i *"" * . ft