GIFT OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS UNIVERSITY EXTENSION DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION AND SOCIAL WELFARE BULLETIN No. 1 STATE BOARDS OF EDUCATION IRA WOODS HOWERTH Professor of Education and Director of University Extension UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS UNIVERSITY EXTENSION DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION AND SOCIAL WELFARE BULLETIN No. 1 STATE BOARDS OF EDUCATION IRA WOODS HOWERTH Professor of Education and Director of University Extension UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY JANUARY, 1913 vi 7 FOREWORD. ry ;m amendment to the Constitution of the State of Cali- fornia, adopted by the people at the last election, the legislature is i ( , provide for the appointment or election of a State Board of Education, which board is to "provide, compile or cause to he compiled, and adopt a uniform series of text-books for use in the day and evening elementary schools throughout the state," ,ni(l to perform such other duties as may be prescribed by law. This in effect abolishes the existing State Board of Education and 1- hi-cs upon the legislature the responsibility of creating a new one and defining its powers and duties. The creation of a new state board of education in these days when educational legislation is basing itself more and more upon scientific educational principles is a delicate and a difficult, as well as a mast important task, a task which should not be undertaken without a full knowledge of the structure, functions, and degrees of efficiency of the existing state boards of education throughout the country. It is desirable, therefore, for the benefit of citizens who may be interested in any attempt to modify the educational system of the State, and particularly those upon whom must devolve the respons- ihility of leight and seven members respectively. The favorite num- <-t to the members of new and proposed state boards are seven and nine. The existing situation with respect to number of mem- bers in each of the state boards of education is as follows: of States. 3 Colorado, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, Oregon, Texas. 4 Michigan, Missouri. Florida, Utah, Vermont. 6 Georgia, West Virginia. Connecticut, Delaware, Kansas, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Washington. 8 Arizona, Arkansas, Maryland, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Ten- nessee, Virginia. '. Iowa, Massachusetts, South Carolina. 10 Louisiana. 1 1 California, Indiana, Montana, New York. of the thirty-seven state boards of education ten are wholly ex officio. of the^e, eight consist of state officers alone. Nevada makes the president -tate university a member of its board of three. The boards of California ami Delaware, as hitherto constituted, are the only completely -i sting almost entirely of school officials. All the state boards of education, save those of Massachusetts, New A York, aiid Fowa, have one or more members ex officio. They usually include the governor or state superintendent, or both. The boards of Ari/ona, Indiana, Kansas, Utah, Virginia and Washington include one or more professional educators among their ex officio members. The tendency, houever. as indicated by the reconstruction of the boards of 8y, (ieorgia. Oklahoma, Vermont and the newly created boards of I 'en nsy 1 vania, Arkansas and Iowa, is away from the t .; tiffii-in type. New York has gone so far in this direction as to prescribe that ''there shall be no < r ntfim, members" of the board of that state, and that no member shall be a trustee, president, principal, or any other olh'cer of an educational institution under the supervision of the board. 267561 In the states in which the state board of education contains other than ex officio members, the usual method of appointment is by the gov- ernor, often with the provision "by and with the advice and consent of the Senate." Appointment by the governor prevails in Arizona, Ar- kansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah and Washington. In certain states, as, for instance, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and West Virginia, the statutory provision is that one member must be appointed from each congressional district. In New York, judicial districts must be repre- sented "as far as may be." Such boards as a rule must be bi-partisan. In Massachusetts, New Jersey and Iowa, all members are appointed by the governor; in Arkansas, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania all but one are so appointed; in Connecticut and Rhode Island non-ex-officio members are elected by the general assembly; in Virginia, by the Senate from a list of eligibles, and in West Virginia they are appointed by the state superintendent. In New York all are elected by the legislature. Michigan is the only state which provides for the election of non-ex-officio members by popular vote. The prevailing practice, then, with respect to the selection of members of state boards of education, is appointment by the governor. The appointment of members of a state board of education by the governor is obviously attended with dangers. Various methods have been devised to guard against the possibility of these dangers. As already pointed out, Virginia limits the selection of members by the Senate to a list of eligibles. This list must include members of the faculties of state institutions. Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Washington and West Virginia, by narrowing the list of eligibles to certain school officials, or persons of certain educational qualifications, also, as already said, practically insure for themselves a professional board. When educational qualifications are prescribed they are usually of :i general character, as, for instance, "citizens of prominence actively en- gaged in the educational work of the state," as in Indiana, Utah and Kansas; or persons of "high character, integrity and capacity," as in Maryland and Utah. Of the more efficient boards consisting largely of appointed or elected members, only Massachusetts, New York and New Jersey prescribe no educational qualifications whatever. In terms of office of appointed or elected members of the different state boards of education there is wide variation. In Kansas and Wash- ington such members serve for two years; in Indiana, Massachusetts, Ehode Island and Virginia three years; in Connecticut, Georgia, Louisiana, Virginia and Montana four years; in New Mexico and West Virginia five years; in Maryland, Iowa, Michigan, Tennessee and Pennsylvania six years; in Arkansas seven; in New Jersey eight, and in New York eleven. In West Virginia there is a peculiar situation whereby a board is ap- pointed for a term of five years by a state superintendent whose term of office is only four years. Provision is almost invariably made so that members are not all appointed at one time. Thus continuity of educa- tional policy is secured, and the control of the board by an executive or political party is at least in part prevented. This unity and freedom from external control are apparently the only principles implied in fix- ing the term of office. The compensation of members of state boards of education is univer- sally nominal. The actual expenses incurred by members in attendance upon meetings of the board are usually allowed. Sometimes the amount so incurred is limited to a specific sum. In many of the states a per (In in in addition to necessary expenses is allowed, but in no case, ex- cept Oklahoma, in which it is fixed at six dollars, does this amount ex- ceed five dollars. Certain states limit the number of days for which a per diem, or expenses, may be drawn. Georgia grants an honorarium of $250 in addition to traveling expenses. The principle of providing salaries for members of a state board of education receives no recognition in any of the states. III. I'OWKRS AND DUTIES. The different powers and duties of state boards of education, as pre- M-rihed in the constitutions and legislation of the various states, number some seventy-five or one hundred. Many of them, however, are unimpor- tant. A few boards are limited to the performance of very few functions. In Iowa, fur instance, the sole important function of the state board is to control tlu- higher educational institutions of the state; in Texas, merely to and apportion school funds, and act as a court of appeals from the MS .if the state superintendent. As a rule, however, the board is vested with such powers and performs such duties as give it high educa tional diirnity ami importance. Among the most important powers and 'rihed in the various states are the following: the supervision of all educational \\ork supported in whole or in part by the state; the management ami investment of school funds; the employment of a state superintendent or equivalent officer; the granting and revoking of teach- ers' certificates; the adoption of courses of study and uniform series of text -hooks for elementary schools; the standardi/ing of the secondary schools and colleges of the state; the inspection of school buildings for sanitary purposes* and the furnishing of plans and specifications for school buildings; the medical inspection of school children and the pre- of tests for the: t and hearing; the recommendation of needed school legislation; the appointment and removal of county super- intendents; the encouragement and promotion of new forms of educational effort; the conferring of degrees and diplomas; the control of appropri- ations for equalizing educational advantages throughout the state, and the supervision of semi-public schools. The tendency, particularly as re- vealed by recent school legislation, is to increase the powers and duties of the state board. Idaho, for instance, has recently extended the duties of the state board from the mere power of issuing and revoking teachers' certificates to the general supervision of the entire educational work of the state. The most complete educational authority is vested in the boards of Massachusetts, New York and New Jersey. IV. CONSPECTUS. Most of the facts already specified with respect to state boards of education may be seen at a glance in the following table showing the particular states that now have a state board of education, the number of members of these boards, the terms of office, composition, and the most important powers and duties prescribed. STATE BOARDS OF EDUCATION State. S -3 II Composition. Powers and Duties. Arizona 8 Governor, superintendent, principals of normal schools, president uni- versity, and a principal of high school, a city superintendent and a county superintendent appointed by governor.. (1) To prescribe and enforce uni- form series of text-books in pub- lic schools. (2) Same in regard to course of study. (3) To grant six-year and life diplomas and revoke them. (4) To adopt list of books for school libraries. Arkansas .. Superintendent, and one member from each congressional district appointed by governor.. (1) To manage and invest the com- mon school fund. (2) To charter educationaf institutions. (3) To nave general supervision of the schools of the state, with wide advisory functions. STATE BOARDS OF EDUCATION (Continued) State. || * Composition. Powers and Duties. SS HO California .... 11 Governor, superintendent, president University of California and its pro- fessor of pedagogy, principals normal schools (7) (1) To prescribe uniform series of text books in common schools and cause them to be printed by state and sold at cost. (2) To adopt rules for government of schools and libraries. (3) To prescribe high school credentials. (4) To grant life diplomas of four grades and revoke them. (5) To designate an educational journal as official. (6) To desig- nate credentials of other states on which certificates may be issued. Colorado 3 2 Superintendent, secretary of state, attorney gen- eral (1) To grant and revoke certifi- cates. (2) To adopt rules and regulations for government of schools. (The legislature and the board are prohibited by the con- stitution from prescribing text books) Connecticut Governor, lieutenant gov- ernor, secretary board of education, and four appointed by general bly ( 1 ) To have general supervision and control of educational inter- ests. (2) To direct what books may be used in schools. (3) To secure uniformity of reports. (4) To hold and conduct teachers' meetings. (5) To grant and re- voke certificates. (6) To provide for testing eyesight of children. (7) To enforce child labor law. (8) To maintain normal school and model school. (9) To ap- point a secretary and fix his salary. Governor, secretary of .-t;it', president Dela- \v-.-in- C..l!f(;t>, state au- ditor, and senior im-m- IMTS of county school commissioners . (1) To prescribe uniform series of Looks. (2) To secure uni- form system of reports from teachers and school officers. (3) To determine matters of contro- versy. 10 STATE BOARDS OF EDUCATION (Continued) State. Florida Georgia Idaho Indiana Composition. 4 Governor, superintendent, secretary of state, at- torney general, and state treasurer ... Governor, state superin- tendent, and four mem- bers appointed by gov- ernor ... 2 Superintendent, secretary of state, attorney gen- eral Powers and Duties. (1) To remove public school officers for cause. (2) To manage and invest school funds. (3) To de- cide appeals. (4) To direct and control normal schools, Military Institute and Institute for Blind, Deaf and Dumb. (1) To decide appeals. (2) To or- der school census. (3) To select text-books for common schools. (1) To grant certificates and re- voke them. (2) To recommend legislation. (3) To have general supervision of educational work of the state. (4) To present reg- ulations for sanitary equipment and inspection of school build- ings. (5) To prepare course of study for public schools. (6) To prescribe rules and regulations for institutes. (7) To prepare examination questions for teach- ers' certificates. (Duty of county superintendents to carry out the instructions of state board and state superin- tendent. The state board of edu- cation, state superintendent and county superintendents may issue teachers' certificates. The state board has general control of en- tire system.) 11 3 Governor, superintendent, president State Univer- sity, president Purdue Universitv, president state normal, superin- tendents three largest cities, and three citi- zens actively engaged in educational work, one of whom must be county superintendent, appointed by governor.. (1) To grant and revoke certifi- cates. (2) To act as teachers' training board. (3) To act as state library board. (4) To ap- point board of visitors to state normal. (5) To prescribe course of study for accredited schools. (6) To select or procure the compilation of a series of text- books to be used in common echools. 11 STATE BOARDS OF EDUCATION (Continued) State. It Composition. Powers and Duties. Kentucky Louisiana 6 Appointed by governor, not more than five from same political party.... 2 Superintendent, chancel- lor State University, president State Agri- cultural College, presi- dent state normal and three appointed by governor 4 Superintendent, attorney general, secretary of state . (Jr.v.-rnor. superintendent, attorney general, seven appointed by governor, one from each con- gressional district 6 Governor, superintendent and six appointed by governor, at least two horn sli.-ill be from ;ti- political par- Principals of nor- mal schools and of nor- mal departments of any school or college under control of the State Board are honorary members, but with no richt to vote (1) To control higher educational institutions. (1) To grant certificates. (2) To prescribe courses of study for public schools, normal institutes and Indian training schools. (3) To examine and accredit educa- tional institutions upon applica- tion. (1) To prepare rules, by-laws and regulations for government of schools. (2) To prepare suitable lists of books for county libraries. (3) To prescribe regulations for management of libraries. (4) To prescribe and publish graded course of study for public schools. (1) To prepare rules, regulations and by-laws for government of public schools. (2) To enforce uniformity of text-books in pub- lic schools. ( 1 ) To remove or suspend county superintendents. (2) To decide controversies arising over the law. (.*]) To have general care and supervision of public school in- is. (4) To secure uniform- ity in statistical reports of teach- ers and county boards. (5) To grant MrttfiOMW. (6) To act as trustees of state normal schools. STATE BOARDS OF EDUCATION (Continued) State. Composition. Powers and Duties. Massachusetts Appointed by governor, with approval of coun- cil (1) To secure uniformity of re- ports. (2) To appoint secretary. (3) To manage state normal schools. (4) To arrange for prac- tice schools. (5) To direct and supervise education of state bene- ficiaries in special institutions for deaf and blind. (6) To re- ceive applications of teachers and furnish information concerning such applicants to school com- mittees and superintendents. (7) To manage the school fund. (8) To determine the length of insti- tutes and apply not more than $350 to meet expenses of each. (9) To grant high school certi- ficates and certificates to sup- erintendents of schools. (10) To prescribe rules of instruction, test cards, blanks, etc., for test- ing sight and hearing of chil- dren. (11) To visit county tru- ancy schools. (12) To inspect high schools for the purpose of approving, for state reimburse- ment of tuition, expenditures for pupils of other towns not having high schools. (13) To provide for the introduction of training in industry, agriculture and the household arts. (14) To have supervision of all educational work supported in whole or in part by the commonwealth. Michigan 4 Mississippi .... 3 Superintendent (secre- tary), three elected by popular vote Secretary of state, attor- ney general and super intendent public in- struction ( 1 ) To supervise normal schools, and prescribe course of study in same. (2) To grant state certifi- cates. (3) To pass on text-books in physiology. (1) To decide appeals from the decision of the county or the state superintendent. (2) To re- voke county certificates for cause. (3) To audit claims against the common school fund. (4) To determine necessary contingent expenses of state superintendent's office. (5) To regulate all matters arising in the practical admini- stration of the school system which are not otherwise provided for. (6) To adopt, if thought necessary, a course of study to L8 STATK BOARDS OF EDUCATION State. Composition. Powers and Duties. HO Missouri 4 Superintendent (presi- dent), governor, secre- tary of state, attorney general Montana 11 Governor, superintendent, attorney general and eight appointed by gov- ernor Kcrradi Governor, superintendent, president of university.. Ni-\v Jersey ..8 8 Appointed by governor.... be pursued in the schools. (7) To designate an arbor day. (8; To require reports from county superintendents. ( 1 ) To supervise entire educational interests of state. (2) To see that state school moneys are col- lected and properly applied, and to report to the legislature. (3) To prescribe requirements for approved summer schools. (4) To prepare outlines of work for county institutes. (1) To control and supervise state educational institutions. (2) To grant six-year and life diplomas. (3) To appoint instructors in county institutes. (4) To formu- late a state course of study for high schools, and to accredit such high schools as do satisfactory work. (5) To authorize the sup- erintendent to provide rules and regulations for conducting eighth grade examinations. (6) To choose and appoint a president and faculty for state institutions and fix compensation. (7) To have financial management of said in- stitutions. (8) To regulate course and prescribe text-books for state university. (1) To prescribe the course of study in public schools. (2) To recom- mend list of books for district libraries. '3) To issue and re- voke state and county certificates. (4) To act with four appointees of governor as state text-book commission. ( 1 ) To manage state normal schools and state charitable used by countv super- intendents in examinations. (4) To accredit schools. (5) To ap- prove courses of higher institu- tions, and to unify educational system. W. Virginia.. 6 5 Superintendent and five others engaged in edu- cational work appointed by him, one from each congressional district. ... (1) To act as state board of ex- aminers. (2) To prescribe a course of study for the public schools. (3) To define the rela- tion of the different kinds of schools. 18 V. RELATION OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION. On January 14, 1813, New York elected the first state superintendent of schools. For exactly a hundred years, then, state supervision of schools by a single educational official has had a place in American school systems. Today every state in the Union has such supervision. The name of the official varies in the different states, but his functions are in general of the same character. In the earlier period of state supervision in almost all of the states, the functions of a state superintendent of schools were performed by some other state officer, usually the secretary of state. Dela- ware, however, is the only state in which this practice now prevails. As to the method of selection, state superintendents of schools are, in the majority of states, elected by the people. This practice prevails in thirty-five states. In Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Tennessee, however, the superintendent is ap- pointed by the governor. In Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and New York he is appointed by the state board of education, and in Vermont by the general assembly. In all ex officio state boards of education the superintendent is a mem- ber. He is also a member of the board in twenty other states, namely, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia. In Arkansas, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Utah, Washington and West Virginia, he is chairman of the board, and in West Virginia he is authorized to appoint the other mem- bers. The prevailihg tendency in modern thought upon school administra- tion is to favor the appointment of a superintendent by the state board of education, to act as secretary and executive agent of the board. This is the method practiced by Massachusetts since 1837. It is also the method of New York. In New Jersey the relation of the superintendent is similar, although he is appointed by the governor. These states have initiated a practice which in time wiJl probably become general, that is, of selecting a superintendent with respect only to his ability and without regard to his place of residence. Election of a superintendent by the I eople has many things to commend it, but it is gradually giving way to the principle of selection, almost generally accepted in political science, that expert service may be more certainly secured by appointment than by popular election. lit VI. liOAIiDS <)F MASSACHUSETTS, NEW YORK, PENNSYLVANIA AND WASHINGTON. For the purpose of comparison it may be well to describe somewhat in y lending hooks and apparatus. It i->t aldishes in the academies of the university examinations in -Indies, furnishes a suitalde standard for grad nation from academie> and of admission to college, and grants certificates and diplomas to those \\lio pa*s Mich examinations. It controls the whole matter of granting honorary degn-es and diplomas. The hoard has power to incorporate any university, college, academy, lihrarv. museum, or other institution for the promotion of science, literature, art, history or other departments of knowledge. 20 The New York plan has been criticised as illustrating too great cen- tralization of authority. It is perhaps too early to determine whether it is superior to the other types of board. There can be no doubt, however, about the general tendency being strongly toward greater centralization. "Not only are its advantages quite apparent," says President Butler of Columbia University, "b'ut the overwhelming current of legislation and cf the decisions of the courts is making it imperative. These are practi- cally in accord, and are to the effect that in each state the school system is not local, but general; not individual schools controlled by separate communities, but a closely related system of schools which has become a state system and is entirely under state authority. Local school officials are now uniformly held to be agents of the state for the administration of a state system of education." The Massachusetts board of education originated in 1837. Horace Mann was its first secretary. It consisted of ten members the governor, lieutenant governor, and eight members appointed by the governor. The number of members and the method of appointment remained the same until 1909. Attempts were made soon after its establishment to abolish the board, but its effectiveness is now generally admitted. ' 'It has always stood for safety, at least, if not for brilliant initiative. Still further it has no doubt provided, all things considered, a better state educational administration than the people would have directly provided for them- selves, voting at the popular election. The board has also proved a very competent authority to manage, with the help of its secretary, the state normal schools. ' '1 A former secretary of the board declares that * ' the board has been almost the sole instrumentality in securing helpful legis- lation and in protecting the schools from hostile enactments. It has also had a powerful uplifting and broadening influence." Its reports have carried information to the people of Massachusetts and have often been republished by the legislatures of other states, by the British parliament, and by the German government. In 1905 Massachusetts appointed a commission on industrial and tech- nical education. It was authorized to investigate "the needs for education in the different grades of skill and responsibility in the various industries of the commonwealth," and also to ascertain "how far the needs are met by existing institutions," and to "consider what new forms of educa- tional effort may be advisable." This commission in its report recom- mended the creation of a commission on industrial education, and such a commission was appointed in 1906. In 1909 this commission was consoli- iHinsdale: Horace Mann and the Common School Revival in the United States, page 108. 21 dated with the state board of education. This new board consists of nine members appointed by the governor and confirmed by the council. As constituted in 1837, the board had duties but no particular powers. It was to prepare an abstract of the school returns and to make an annual report to the legislature concerning the conditions and the efficiency of the common school system, and to suggest means of improving it. Its powers and duties have been gradually enlarged until today it is author- ized to supervise all the school work of the state supported in whole or in part by the commonwealth, and to appoint a commissioner of educa- tion, to fix his salary, and to appoint two deputy commissioners at equal salaries, one of whom shall be especially qualified to deal with industrial education. 2 Other powers and duties of this board are specified on page 12. One of the newest boards of education is that of Pennsylvania. The new code adopted in that state provides for a state board of education con- sisting of the superintendent and six members appointed by the governor. The term of office is to be six years. Three of the appointive members must be successful educators of high standing, connected with the school system of the commonwealth. All members serve without compensation other than the payment of necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties as members of the board. The superintendent of public instruction is < ./ o///V/o a member of the board and its president. Among the powers and duties of the board are the following: to recommend needed school legislation; to equalize, through special appropriations for that purpose, or otherwise, the educational advantages of the different of the commonwealth; to inspect schools and institutions wholly or partly supported by the state which are not supervised by other public authorities, and require reports from them; to encourage and promote agricultural education, manual training, domestic science and such other \ocational and practical education as the needs of the commonwealth may require; to prescribe rules and regulations for the sanitary equipment and inspection of school buildings, and to take such other action as it may deem eeenny and expedient to promote the physical and moral welfare of the children in the puldic schools; and to appoint such officers as it deem- Reeanary and to define their duties. 3 Of this board the United <'iimnii-sioner of Education says, it "appears to be an innovation of importance, hut the provi-ions relating to it are Mich that it has little independent power. Its functions are not greatly differentiated from of the superintendent of public instruction, and it is apparently expected that the latter official will be the ruling force in the board, of which he is president.''-* As a rule, however, boards when first created - Reports t*. S. Commissioner of Education, 1908, Vol. 1, page 44; I'.HI'.t. Vol. 1. pa-e ll 1 . B Mool Laws and Decisions of Pennsylvania. I'.'ll, pages 49-50. * Reports, 1911, Vol. 1, pages 6s 22 are not endowed with great powers. Their powers grow. Connecticut has long had a state board of education, but according to the report of the Connecticut educational commission it is not yet armed with sufficient authority to carry out its legitimate purposes. "The board often finds itself confronted by unwillingness to accept advice, resentment of coun- sel, determined opposition to anything like control. The statutes whose operation would tend, and do tend, to an amelioration of evil are mostly permissive. ' ' These statutes in the opinion of the commission should be changed "so that they should compel rather than permit. In short, the commission is distinctly of the opinion that the state board should be armed with a lawful authority to supervise and control the educational interests of the state. "5 Washington is one of the states which has recently reorganized its State board of education. The facts concerning it are perhaps sufficiently set forth in the table (see page 17). VII. ADVANTAGES OF A STATE BOARD. The advantages of a properly constituted state board of education are perhaps sufficiently obvious, and yet in almost every attempt to re- organize a state educational system some opposition to the principle of control of educational affairs by a state board has been manifested. In view of this, it may be well to set forth briefly some of these advantages. In the first place, a state board is usually regarded as necessary to secure the systematic organization of the state educational forces. Such a board has proved to be an effective means of developing and sustaining public sentiment in favor of the highest and best things in education. It repre- sents public recognition of the importance and dignity of the educational work of a state. It may hold aloft high ideals with respect to schools, prevent the over-lapping of the work of the different educational institu- tions, be instrumental in formulating needed school legislation and in securing its passage. It should protect schools from ill-advised, needless or hostile legislation. In short, through a properly constituted and effi- cient state board of education, orderly and intelligent educational ad- vancement may be secured, and the educational system may be enabled to adjust itself more or less automatically to the changing educational needs and conditions of a growing state. s Eeport of the Connecticut Special Educational Commission, 1909, page 7. 23 VIII. INFERENCES. It is unsafe to draw anything but general inferences from the present constitution and powers of state boards of education with respect to the creation of a new board for California. Educational conditions here are not exactly the same as in the other states. Moreover, the existing boards are not ideal. They are not what they ought to be, but what they may be; that is, they are the results of compromise. In general, however, and without regard to the particular needs of *;ite, the following inferences with respect to the creation of a state board of education may be drawn from existing practice and modern thought upon educational administration. First, a state board of educa- tion properly constituted is a valuable educational agency, and should be tn integral part of a state educational system. Second it should consist of not less than five nor more than nine members. These members should not be ex ojficio. They should be appointed by the governor with the advico and consent of the senate, and should be citizens of recognized ability and public spirit. The board should be non-partisan. The term of office should be in general longer than that of the appointing officer. Third, among the powers and duties that should be assigned to such board are the following: to have general supervision of the public schools of the state; to elect a secretary who shall be its executive officer, and to appoint such other officers as it may deem necessary to the effective supervision of the schools of the state; to classify and standardize the public schools; to provide rules for the apportionment of school funds, and for the dis- tribution of any fund that may be set aside to assist and encourage schools; to provide rules and regulations for the granting of teachers' certificates; to provide plans and specifications for school buildings; to provide for the sanitary inspection of school buildings and for the ex- amination of pupils to detect contagious and infectious diseases and physi- cal defects, and to take such other action as may seem necessary to pro- mote tlio physical welfare of school children; to prescribe, or recommend, minimum courses of study for public schools; to encourage, and provide for, new forms of educational effort, and in general to take such action as may be necessary to promote the organization and increase the efficiency .f the educational systom of the state. With such or similar powers and duties a properly constituted board of education should be of the highest value with respect to educational administration and educational develop- 24 BIBLIOGRAPHY DEXTER, E. G. The State System; in his History of Education in the United States, 1904, pp. 199-202. DRAPER, A. S. Limits of State Control in Education. Educational Re- view 1:26-32 (January, 1901). DRAPER, A. S. Educational Organization and Administration. In mono- graphs on Education in the United States, edited by N. M. Butler, 1:3-31, 1904. DUTTON, S. T. and SNEDDEN, DAVID The Administration of Public Educa- tion in the United States, 1908, pp. 54-72. EASTON, WARREN Best System of State Supervision. United States Bureau of Education, Circular of Information, 1887. No. 3, pp. 156-173. FAIRLIE, J. A. Public Education; in his Centralization of Administration in New York State, Columbia University Studies in History, Econo- mics and Public Law, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1898. MACLEAN, G. E. Unification of a State's Educational Forces. New Eng- land Magazine, Vol. 44:355. NEW YORK (STATE) LEGISLATURE Final Report of the special joint com- mittee on Educational Administration, 1904. SCHOOL REVIEW Appointive or Elected Boards of Education, 16:36 (1908). SCHOOL REVIEW Proposed Unification of Educational Administration, 11: 423 (1903). WEBSTER, W. A. Recent Centralizing Tendencies in State Educational Administration. Columbia University Studies in History, Econo- mics and Public Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1897. ,,,.>. ->" """' to UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY