THE CHURCH 
 AND THE MINISTRY
 
 BY THE SAME AUTHOR 
 
 Roman Catholic Claims. Sixth Edition. Crown 
 8vo. 35. 6d. 
 
 CONTENTS. The Via. Media and the Roman Catholic Develop- 
 mentThe Unity of the Church The Authority of the Church 
 The Bible in the Church The Promise to St. Peter The Growth 
 of the Roman Church The Development of the Papacy in Latin 
 Christianity The Nature of Schism Anglican Ordinations 
 Anglican Orthodoxy Three Recent Papal Utterances. 
 
 The Athanasian Creed, forming one of the Oxford 
 House Papers. Crown 8vo. Sewed. 3d. 
 
 LONGMANS, GREEN, AND 'CO. 
 
 LONDON, NEW YORK, AND BOMBAY.
 
 THE CHURCH 
 AND THE MINISTRY 
 
 BY 
 
 CHARLES GORE, M.A., D.D. 
 
 OF THE COMMUNITY OF THE RESURRECTION 
 
 CANON OF WESTMINSTER 
 HON. CHAPLAIN IN ORDINARY TO THE QUEEN 
 
 FOURTH EDITION, REVISED 
 
 LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 
 
 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON 
 
 NEW YORK AND BOMBAY 
 
 I 900 
 
 All rights rtservtd'
 
 PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION. 
 
 IN issuing a new and cheaper edition of this book 
 it has been necessary in the first place to bring it 
 up to date. Dr. Achelis' edition of the Canons of 
 Hippolytus, and the practical certainty which the 
 discussion of them has brought with it that they 
 represent the ecclesiastical principles and practices 
 of the Church of Rome (and Africa) at the beginning 
 of the third or even the end of the second century, 
 have rendered it necessary to take the ' ordinal ' 
 which they contain as the basis for the study of the 
 Church's rites of ordination instead of that certainly 
 later development in the Apostolical Constitutions, 
 which Dr. Hatch treated as 'the earliest form.' 1 
 Notice had also to be taken of the recently discovered 
 ' Prayer Book of Bishop Serapion ' a writing not 
 far from contemporary with the present form of the 
 Apostolical Constitutions, but containing prayers for 
 ordination of a quite independent character. 2 There 
 were, moreover, a great number of minor points on 
 which references to more recent literature had become 
 possible. 
 
 In the second place, on a few minor points it 
 
 1 See pp. 131 ff. 2 See pp. 131, 331 ff. 
 
 2065242
 
 vi Christian Ministry. 
 
 had become necessary to confess a change of mind. 
 Thus I do not now think Dr. Liddon's view of the 
 meaning of ' by means of prophecy/ in i Tim. iv. 14, 
 is tenable. I think the words most probably refer to 
 the ' prophecies ' which ' went before ' and designated 
 Timothy for his office (as in i Tim. i. 18) and which 
 therefore could be described as a means through which 
 he received the gift of ordination. I no longer think 
 they mean an inspired prayer or formula of ordination 
 which accompanied the laying-on of hands. We 
 sometimes need to be reminded that the two 
 statements about Timothy's ordination (i Tim. iv. 
 14, 2 Tim. i. 6) are independent, and each complete 
 for its own purpose. We must not combine them by 
 dovetailing them into one another as if they were 
 detached pieces to be put together in a child's puzzle. 
 But I do not find myself, on reviewing this book 
 after eleven years, constrained or able to alter it in 
 any important respect. Scholars of all sorts are, 
 it seems to me, increasingly accepting the principle 
 on which my argument is based, that Christ instituted 
 a visible society, called the Church. But the question 
 is still much agitated (i) whether the visible society 
 thus instituted was endowed by Christ's own action 
 with officers of government and ministry in the 
 persons of the apostles : (2) whether as the require- 
 ments of the future opened out before the apostles, 
 it was made evident to them, as Clement of Rome 
 says it was, 1 that they must hand on the commission 
 
 1 See p. 287.
 
 Preface to the Fourth Edition. vii 
 
 of ministerial authority as they had themselves re- 
 ceived it : (3) whether thus an apostolic succession in 
 the ministry is an element of continuity in the Church 
 which we cannot dispense with : (4) whether, finally, 
 any but bishops have in fact the authority to hand 
 on ministerial authority and thus maintain the 
 succession. 
 
 Now (i) on the first of those points a decidedly 
 negative answer has been returned by Dr. Hort 
 in his posthumously published work on The Christian 
 Ecclesia. It necessarily has very great weight as 
 coming from Dr. Hort: and it is, beyond all ques- 
 tion, an effective weapon in the hands of those who, 
 like Dr. Brown, in his Congregational Union Lectures 
 for 1897, seek to invalidate the principle of the 
 Apostolical succession. 1 But it seems to many of 
 us that it is only Dr. Hort's name which gives weight 
 to his opinion. As an argument against the position 
 that the apostolate is treated in the New Testa- 
 ment documents as really an office of government and 
 ministry in the Church, instituted and empowered by 
 Christ and left by Him to carry on His work when 
 His visible presence was withdrawn, it seems to me 
 to be a failure. We only ask for argument in view of 
 the whole evidence, and not merely fragments of it ; 
 and I have endeavoured to deal with the matter in 
 an appended note. 2 
 
 (2) I cannot but maintain my former position that 
 
 1 Apostolical Succession by John Brown, B. A., D.D. London, 
 
 2 See p. 382.
 
 viii Christian Ministry. 
 
 the apostles did consciously hand on the ministerial 
 authority which they had received from Christ as a 
 permanent endowment of the Church. No doubt at 
 the first, while the disciples, including the apostles, 
 were expecting an immediate return of Christ, there 
 was very little thought for the future. No doubt 
 also the earliest Church was enriched with miraculous 
 gifts which set the stamp of divine authorization 
 upon certain men as inspired prophets, and made 
 their authorization by the Church a minor matter. 
 But not even recognised inspiration made a prophet 
 independent of the Church. And the question how 
 much was to be allowed to prophets whose divine 
 inspiration was recognized either did not become, or 
 at least did not long remain, a practical question. 
 The importance of the Pastoral Epistles and of the 
 evidence supplied by Clement of Rome 1 and Clement 
 of Alexandria 2 lies precisely in this : that they show 
 us how the apostles, and especially St. Paul and 
 St John, dealt authoritatively with the ordinary 
 organization of the Church in view of a more or less 
 prolonged future and with experience of its normal 
 requirements. 
 
 (3) Again, setting aside the question of the 
 power allowed to one whose divine inspiration the 
 Church acknowledged, no evidence is forthcoming 
 that the principle of the apostolic succession that is, 
 the requirement for one who would take rank with the 
 ' ministers of the word and sacraments ' of an appoint- 
 
 1 See pp. 287 ff. 2 See pp. 262 ff.
 
 Preface to the Fourth Edition. ix 
 
 ment or ordination from above directly or indirectly 
 apostolic was ever disregarded. There is nothing 
 of real force to be set against St. Clement's letter, 
 with its clear assertion of the principle, and the weight 
 of the tradition as we find it in the later part of the 
 second century. Dr. Brown has recently again repre- 
 sented the excommunicated Montanists as main- 
 tainers of a primitive or anti-hierarchical Christianity 
 against an ecclesiasticism just becoming dominant. 
 I can only with Mr. Headlam l say again, and en- 
 deavour to prove, 2 that on the evidence such a view 
 seems to me ' entirely false.' 
 
 (4) The last question is whether the highest 
 governing authority in the churches, including the 
 authority to continue the succession, ever belonged to 
 equal bodies of presbyter-bishops. I am sure that I 
 am in no way unwilling to accept such a view if there 
 were sufficient evidence for it, but it still seems to 
 me that the evidence as a whole is against it. Since 
 this book first came out, no one, as far as I have 
 seen, has faced the difficulty of reconciling Jerome's 
 statement about the early Alexandrian Church 
 which would substantially support this position 
 with the evidence of Origen's language, which is the 
 language of an Alexandrian, contemporary with the 
 changes which Jerome supposes to have occurred. 3 
 The Canons of Hippolytus assure us that the limita- 
 tion of ordination to bishops was exactly as clearly 
 
 1 Authority and Archeology, p. 393. 2 See pp. 190 ff, 255 ff. 
 
 2 See p. 125. On p. 330 I have examined the meaning of the 'Apophthegm' 
 which Dom Butler has quoted as having a bearing on Jerome's view.
 
 x Christian Ministry. 
 
 recognized a principle circa 200, as when Jerome and 
 Chrysostom were writing. Further back it seems 
 clear that Clement of Rome does not suggest that 
 the local presbyters held the right to appoint their 
 successors, and certainly Ignatius' letters do not con- 
 template any other Churches than those which were 
 governed by the three orders. Thus while ad- 
 mitting the obscurity and difficulties of the subject 
 I still think the best supported view is that mon- 
 episcopacy had its origin from a more or less gradual 
 localizing of an authority which in the subapostolic 
 age belonged in many parts of the Church to men of 
 what one may call subapostolic distinction, called 
 prophets, or evangelists, or leaders, and not yet 
 settled as ' bishops ' of particular churches. 
 
 Since this book was written, Dr. Moberly's power- 
 ful work on the The Ministerial Priesthood (John 
 Murray, 1897) has appeared, and Dr. Sanday's on the 
 Conception of Priesthood (Longmans, 1899). On 
 certain points their argument is a very valuable sign 
 of progress. And Dr. Moberly has rendered parts of 
 this book unnecessary by dealing with its subject- 
 matter much more fully and profoundly. Never- 
 theless, what had been written has been suffered 
 to remain. Mr. Rackham also has dealt much 
 more fully than I was able to do with 'the 
 position of the laity in the early Church' in a 
 volume of Essays in Aid of Church Reform (John 
 Murray, 1898). 
 
 In dealing with any questions touching the
 
 Preface to the Fourth Edition. xi 
 
 principle of sacramentalism or sacerdotalism, it seems 
 to me that nothing is more important than to observe 
 moderation and balance of statement. On this as 
 much as on any subject, one-sided statement of truth 
 is almost equivalent to positive untruth. This lesson 
 of balance and moderation is on this particular subject 
 taught us, it seems to me, by our Lord Himself. 
 For what do we find in His teaching? Denuncia- 
 tions of the misuse of hierarchical or ecclesiastical 
 power which have in them the most awful force, 
 and which ' Protestants ' of all ages have not been 
 slow to use as their most effective weapons. ' Thus 
 have ye made the word of God of none effect because 
 of your tradition.' ' Ye have taken away the key 
 of knowledge.' ' Ye compass sea and land to make 
 one proselyte.' Our Lord certainly saw and em- 
 phasized all the dangers to which ecclesiastical 
 authority is always liable. But on the other hand 
 He refuses to allow us to dispense with its legitimate 
 function because of its misuse. c The Scribes and 
 Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. Whatsoever therefore 
 they bid you observe, that observe and do. But do 
 not after their works. For they say and do not.' 
 Here is the plainest assertion of the principle that hier- 
 archical authority is to be respected even altogether 
 apart from moral worth. And when our Lord insti- 
 tuted His own Church of the New Covenant, He 
 conferred upon her those very functions of ' binding ' 
 and 'loosing,' the misuse of which under the Old 
 Covenant He had continually under His eye; and He
 
 xii Christian Ministry. 
 
 most solemnly attached a supernatural sanction to 
 the powers of ' binding ' and ' loosing,' and of remit- 
 ting and retaining sins, by which His new society was 
 to exercise, through its officers, a divine authority 
 over its members. The point is that the Christ both 
 recognized the dangers of ecclesiastical authority as 
 none other has recognized them, and at the same time 
 solemnly re-inaugurated it. I do not see how this is 
 disputable. None the less one-sided tendencies have 
 constantly prevailed in Christendom. They prevail 
 still. They lie deep in human nature. It is very 
 easy to be simply sacerdotalist, without any due 
 regard to the perils of the principle, or simply 
 protestant against sacerdotalism because of the 
 obvious misuses of ecclesiastical power ; but neither 
 attitude is our Lord's. And to discard the principle 
 of ecclesiastical authority because the holders of it 
 at a particular time have seemed to neglect their 
 duty or abuse their power, is in fact to refuse to 
 follow His leading. 
 
 This book claims to be an 'apology 1 for what is 
 in fact the formal or official attitude of the Church 
 of England towards non-episcopal bodies. She does 
 not condemn them, but she refuses to acknowledge 
 their ministry. That is to say, she ordains de novo 
 any minister not episcopally ordained who joins her 
 communion ('unless he have formerly been made 
 priest by episcopal ordination' 1 ), but does not do so 
 with any who have received an episcopal ordination 
 
 1 Act of Uniformity of 1662.
 
 Preface to the Fourth Edition. xiii 
 
 which she recognizes as valid. This is not to judge 
 other men. It is neither to anticipate the divine judg- 
 ment on their position nor to minimize the evidences 
 of divine blessing which are found again and again 
 to rest upon their work. It is simply to say that 
 their organization has, as far as we can judge, 
 been built up in neglect of a law of the Church 
 with which we have no kind of right to dispense, 
 and which, whatever else we may penitently or joy- 
 fully surrender, must be retained as the basis of any 
 
 future reconciliation. 
 
 C. G. 
 
 WESTMINSTER ABBEY, 
 
 All Saints' Day, 1899. 
 
 NOTE ON THE NEWLY DISCOVERED TESTAMENT 
 OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST. 
 
 An interesting Syriac document has just appeared, viz. a 
 Testantentum Domini Nostri Jesu Christi, discovered in a MS. 
 at Mossul on the Tigris, and now edited with a Latin translation 
 by the discoverer, Ignatius Ephraim ii Rahmani, the Uniat 
 Patriarch of the Syrian Antioch (Mainz, 1899). The patriarch 
 claims for this document, which is partly apologetic and partly 
 liturgical, a date prior not only to the Apostolical Constitutions, 
 but also to the Canones Ecclesiastiti ('Egyptian Ch. Ordinances'), 
 and to the Canons of Hippolytus, which he disparages as a late 
 and bad version of the ' Ordinances.' The patriarch's discovery 
 is of great interest, but the whole of his contention is not at all 
 likely to be sustained. In particular, and so far as concerns 
 this book, the rites of ordination which it contains are, I cannot 
 but think, obviously later than those in the Canons of Hippolytus, 
 with which they are yet lineally connected. The ceremonies 
 are more elaborate and the prayers longer. No presbyter takes 
 a part in the ordination of 1 the bishop. The ordinations of 
 bishop and presbyter are more differentiated. The passage 
 about the rights to be allowed to confessors is vaguer. It seems
 
 xiv Christian Ministry, 
 
 to me therefore that the newly discovered document, so far 
 as its rites of ordination go, plainly vindicates the primitive 
 position assigned in this book to the Canons named after 
 Hippolytus. 
 
 FROM THE PREFACE TO THE FIRST 
 EDITION. 
 
 THERE are two large questions having reference to 
 Christianity which it is important to keep distinct. 
 There is the question whether Christianity is true, 
 and there is the question what, as a fact in history, 
 Christianity has been ? It is an indispensable 
 preliminary to all effective dealings with the practical 
 problems, which arise in the attempt to apply and 
 adapt Christianity to current needs and circum- 
 stances, that we should study profoundly the genius 
 of Christianity as a continuous historical fact that 
 we should have a clear answer to the question, what 
 Christianity has been and is. This book, then 
 (assuming broadly the truth of Christianity), 
 attempts to give a partial answer to this second 
 question. It maintains that Christianity is essenti- 
 ally the life of an actual visible society, and that at 
 least one necessary link of connection in this society 
 is the apostolic succession of the ministry. In a 
 word, this book claims on behalf of the apostolic 
 succession that it must be reckoned with as a 
 permanent and essential element of Christianity. 
 It is an ' apology ' for the principle of the apostolic 
 succession.
 
 From the Preface to the First Edition. xv 
 
 As being an 'apology' for one clause in the 
 Church's practical and theoretical creed, it will be 
 subject to the usual suspicions of prejudice and want of 
 free criticism to which apologetic literature is exposed, 
 and from which the literature of ' free thought ' is 
 supposed to be by comparison exempt. But it is, 
 perhaps, only while we are very young that we are 
 inclined to believe dissent from orthodox conclusions 
 to afford any guarantee for a just and critical judg- 
 ment ; in fact, the ambition to form or propagate a 
 new theory gives as strong a bias to the mind as the 
 desire to maintain an old one. At any rate, I have 
 tried to do with my ' prejudices ' all that a man can 
 do with those inevitable accompaniments alike of his 
 birth into a continuous society and of the first 
 activities of his own individuality ; I have tried to 
 subject them to an exact and free examination in the 
 light of reason and history, and to let it correct or 
 verify them. 
 
 A word must be said in explanation of the order 
 and contents of this book. The principle of the 
 apostolic succession has been a formative principle 
 in church history. It seemed, therefore, the best 
 course, after making good the preliminary grounds 
 of this investigation (chap. I), and explaining the idea 
 of the ministry (chap. II), to exhibit the extent to 
 which in church history the principle of the apostolic 
 succession has been postulated and acted upon since 
 the time when the continuous record begins i.e. the 
 latter half of the second century (chap. ill). The
 
 xvi Christian Ministry. 
 
 principle is then examined in the light of the Gospels 
 (chap, iv), of the apostolic documents (chap, v), and 
 of the links of evidence which connect the apostolic 
 age with the continuous history (chap. VI). After 
 this nothing remains but to draw conclusions and 
 make applications (chap. VII). This order treats the 
 question What has the Church in fact believed 
 about her ministry ? as a preliminary to the investiga- 
 tion of her title-deeds, and it was hardly possible for 
 the present writer to treat the question in any other 
 order. Whether or no Mr. Darwin is right in main- 
 taining ' that the only object in writing a book is a 
 proof of earnestness, and that you do not form your 
 opinions without undergoing labour ' (Life and Letters \ 
 \. p. 334), it is, at any rate, true that a book had 
 better represent that process of ' labour ' by which its 
 writer's opinions have in fact been formed. 
 
 The purpose of this book not being primarily or 
 simply archaeological, it has been possible to leave out 
 of discussion a good many elements in the history of 
 the ministry which do not, or so far as they do not, 
 affect the principle. It has been necessary to deal 
 largely in quotations from ancient authors, but it has 
 been possible to omit almost all that bears, e.g. upon 
 the growth of the metropolitan and patriarchal 
 systems, the relations of the later episcopate to 
 secular society, and the history of ecclesiastical 
 discipline or canon law in detail. 
 
 PUSEY HOUSE, 
 St Peter's Day, 1888.
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER I. THE FOUNDATION OF THE CHURCH. 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Preliminary assumptions 
 
 (1) The genuineness of New Testament documents . 2 
 
 (2) The truth of the Incarnation .... 6 
 Preliminary inquiry : Did Christ found a visible Church ? . 8 
 
 The reasonableness of the idea in itself . . 8 
 
 (1) Witness of the early Christian belief in a visible Church 1 1 
 
 (unanimous in spite of differences in point of view) 1 1 
 in the West Tertullian, Cyprian, Irenaeus, (holding 
 ' nulla salus extra ecclesiam ' together with belief in 
 God's wider dealings), the Roman Church . . 12 
 
 in the East Ignatius, Alexandrian writers . . 21 
 
 the Apologists Aristides, Justin, Theophilus . 25 
 
 confirmed by the pagan conception of Christianity . 27 
 
 (2) The social form of Christianity not due to the secular 
 
 influence of the 'collegia,' for . . .27 
 
 (a) Christian writers show no trace of such influence . 31 
 
 (i>) Christian terminology was derived from Judaism . 31 
 
 (3) Witness of the New Testament . . . .32 
 
 (a) The Gospels 
 
 (i) Christ's method, . . . -33 
 
 (ii) His institution of social sacraments . . 36 
 
 (iii) His Messianic claim . . . -37 
 
 (relation of the Church to the ' kingdom of God ') 39 
 
 (the Church not exclusive, though it makes an exclusive 
 
 claim) . . . . . .40 
 
 (b) The Acts ...... 41 
 
 (c) St. Paul's Epistles ..... 42 
 This doctrine is not inconsistent with the doctrines of faith and 
 
 liberty ....... 44 
 
 but agreeable to the principle of all human society . . 46 
 
 (Heaven in the Apocalypse a city) . . . .47 
 
 b
 
 xviii Contents. 
 
 PACK 
 
 Two misconceptions as to the origin of the visible Church 
 
 1 i ) That it arose out of a previous condition of individualism 47 
 
 (2) That it was due to Roman influence : difference between 
 
 the Roman and Catholic conceptions of church unity 51 
 
 Notes on The idea of an invisible Church pp. 17, 33. 
 
 CH. II. APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION 
 
 The method of inquiry . -57 
 
 The principle of Apostolic Succession expounded . . 59 
 
 It corresponds to the Incarnation, Sacraments, etc. . 64 
 The principle more important than the form in which it is 
 
 embodied ...... 65 
 
 Its importance as 
 
 (a) a bond of union for a universal spiritual society . 69 
 
 (6) emphasizing men's dependence on God's gifts . 70 
 
 (f) satisfying the moral needs of those who minister . 73 
 Answers to objections that 
 
 (1) ' It is sacerdotal ' : true and false sacerdotalism . 75 
 
 (2) ' Unspiritual men are thus made to mediate spiritual 
 
 gifts ' : distinction of character and office . . 86 
 
 (3) ' It is opposed to liberty ' : but liberty is opposed to 
 
 absolutism, not to authority ; the Church not at first 
 
 or necessarily an imperialist institution . . 88 
 
 (4) ' It cannot be true in fact ' : this objection not tenable 98 
 
 (5) ' It unchurches presbyterian bodies ' : but results must 
 
 not prevent our facing principles . . . 100 
 
 Noteon Mor inns' ' de sacris ordinationibus ' . p. 61 
 
 Sacramental teaching of the early Fathers 7 1 
 Doctrine of lay-priesthood in catholic theology 81 
 
 CH. III. THE WITNESS OF CHURCH HISTORY. 
 
 Church history bears witness to certain fixed principles 
 
 i. The principle of apostolic succession through the epis- 
 copate (with the requirement for the ministry of 
 
 episcopal ordination) . . . .104 
 
 appealed to by Irenaeus . . . .106 
 
 accepted by Tertullian . . . . .113 
 
 anticipated by Hegesippus . . . .115
 
 Contents. xix 
 
 A. Further evidence for the East 
 
 The episcopal successions 
 
 in Palestine, Syria, Asia, Greece, Macedonia 
 
 Thrace, Crete . . . . .116 
 
 the supposed exceptional constitution of the 
 
 Alexandrian Church . . . .122 
 
 (a) very doubtful in fact . . .125 
 
 (b) not opposed to the principle of succession . 129 
 
 The conception of the ministry in 
 
 (i) liturgical writings . . . .131 
 
 (ii) canons of councils . . . .140 
 
 (iii) Greek Fathers Athanasius, Gregory 
 
 Nazianzen, Chrysostom, Epiphanius . 142 
 
 B. Further evidence for the West 
 
 The episcopal successions undoubted . . .149 
 
 The conception of the ministry in 
 
 (i) Latin Fathers Cyprian, Lucifer, writers 
 who minimize the distinction of bishop 
 and presbyter, i.e. Ambrosiaster, Jerome, 
 etc. . . . . -151 
 
 (ii) canons of councils .... 162 
 (iii) liturgies ..... 163 
 
 2. Ordination was regarded sacramentally . . . 168 
 
 and conferred by laying-on of hands . . .170 
 
 3. It was believed to impose an ' indelible character ' 
 
 though the distinction of ' valid ' and ' canonical ' 
 
 was slowly formulated . . . .172 
 
 4. The conception of the ministry from the first involved 
 
 a sacerdotal principle, though the use of sacerdotal 
 terms was of gradual growth . . .180 
 
 5. The ministry possessed exclusive powers, e.g. only a 
 
 priest could celebrate the Eucharist . . .184 
 
 Tertullian's statement to the contrary due to 
 
 Montanist views . . . 1 88 
 
 Montanism its characteristics . . .190 
 
 not a conservative movement . 193 
 
 Summary ....... 196 
 
 Note on The conception of the ministry in the Clementines p. 118 
 
 ,, % ,, Clem. Alex, 122 
 
 Origen . 127 
 
 The language of Firmilian , . 143
 
 xx Contents. 
 
 The early Irish episcopate . . . p. 1 50 
 
 ' One bishop in a community ' . . .152 
 
 The primacy of Peter' s see . . . .156 
 
 Functions of the presbyterate . . .166 
 
 Morinus on the 'tradition of the instruments' . 171 
 
 Signification oflaying-on of hands . . 172 
 
 Reordination . . . pp. 174, 176, 177 
 
 Sources of sacerdotal language . . .183 
 
 Moberly's ' Ministerial Priesthood' . .184 
 
 CH. IV. THE INSTITUTION OF THE APOSTOLATE. 
 
 The postulates of church history to be verified by an appeal to 
 
 Christ's intention . . . . . . 200 
 
 The Gospels generally suggest the institution of a permanent 
 
 apostolate . . . . . .201 
 
 especially in the commissions to 
 
 (1) St. Peter his relation _to (a) the other Apostles, (6) the 
 
 whole Church ...... 204 
 
 (2) All the Apostles after the resurrection . . . 207 
 
 (the commission in St. John xx to the Apostles rather 
 than the whole Church) .... 209 
 
 Note on Sacrificial aspect of the Eucharist p. 207. 
 
 CH. V. THE MINISTRY IN THE APOSTOLIC AGE. 
 
 Evidence of St. Paul's Epistles : 
 
 (a) The office of an apostle . . . .213 
 
 (b) The Church an organism with differentiated gifts and 
 
 functions . . . . .218 
 
 (c) The Pastoral Epistles their importance ; they show . 221 
 
 (i) a ministry of presbyter-bishops and deacons, not 
 
 the chief ministry .... 223 
 
 (ii) an extension of the apostolate to ' apostolic men ' 225 
 (iii) St. Paul's idea of ordination by the laying-on of 
 
 hands ...... 228 
 
 Evidence of the other Epistles ..... 230
 
 Contents. xxi 
 
 PAGE 
 
 Evidence of the Acts : 
 
 (a) The apostolate ' . . . . . 234 
 
 (b) A ministry of ' prophets and teachers ' . . . 238 
 
 (c ) A local ministry of presbyter-bishops and deacons . 240 
 
 Summary: (i) The apostolate ..... 242 
 
 (2) A subapostolic ministry .... 243 
 
 (3) Presbyter-bishops .... 244 
 
 (4) Deacons ..... 245 
 
 (5) Ordination by laying-on of hands . . 245 
 
 Evidence is lacking as to 
 
 (a) details in the division of functions . . . 246 
 
 (b) the form of the future ministry .... 246 
 
 Note on The Angels of the Apocalypse p. 233. 
 
 CH. VI. THE MINISTRY IN THE SUBAPOSTOLIC AGE. 
 
 Links connecting this apostolic ministry with the episcopate of 
 
 church history ...... 249 
 
 In the East 
 
 I. St. James originates the ' episcopate ' in Jerusalem . 250 
 II. The Didache shows 
 
 (a) a general ministry of ' apostles ' and ' prophets ' 
 
 and ' teachers ' ; 
 
 (b) a local ministry of ' bishops and deacons ' . 253 
 
 III. St. John (with other apostles) develops ' episcopacy' in 
 
 Asia ....... 261 
 
 This is confirmed by the testimony of Ignatius to the 
 
 threefold ministry of bishops, presbyters, and deacons 264 
 
 (HI what sense the presbyterate represents the Apostles) 275 
 
 In the West 
 
 IV. Clement's Epistle 
 
 (a) shows a differentiated ministry having succession 
 
 from the Apostles ; 
 
 (b) postulates an order above the presbyter-bistiops 
 
 and deacons , 290
 
 xxii Contents. 
 
 V. Polycarp's Epistle 
 
 implies absence of a bishop at Philippi ; 
 
 but this is not inconsistent with a superior ministry 
 
 not localized there .... 296 
 
 VI. The Shepherd of Hermas 
 
 suggests a third order above presbyters and deacons 302 
 
 Summary of possible theories : 
 
 1. A college of equal presbyters .... 33 
 
 2. The bishop hidden in the presbyterate . . . 304 
 
 3. What alone seems to satisfy the evidence the episcopate 
 
 derived from a gradual localization of 'prophets,' 
 
 ' teachers,' and ' apostolic men ' 304 
 
 Note on A second apostolic council . p. 251 
 The office of reader . . 260 
 
 The Ignatian controversy . 265 
 
 CH. VII. CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATIONS. 
 
 The verdict of history as to (a) the Church, (b) sacerdotalism, 
 
 (c ) episcopal ordination ..... 306 
 
 Is confirmed by the witness of (a) the Gospels, ((>) the apostolic, 
 
 and (c) subapostolic documents .... 308 
 
 The cogency of the evidence : it can only be satisfied by the 
 
 doctrine of the apostolic succession . . . .312 
 
 This doctrine in its application 
 
 (a) invalidates non-episcopal ministries . . 313 
 
 (b) recalls episcopal Churches to their true principles . 316 
 
 APPENDED NOTES. 
 
 A. Dr. Lightfoot's Dissertation on 'The Christian Ministry' . 321 
 
 B. The early history of the Alexandrian ministry . . 325 
 
 C. Rites and prayers of ordination . . . 331 
 
 D. (i) Canon xiii of Ancyra ..... 338 
 (ii) Chorepiscopi . . . . . -339 
 
 E. Supposed ordinations by presbyters in East and West . 340
 
 Contents. xxiii 
 
 PAGB 
 
 F. The theory of the ministry held by Ambrosiaster, Jerome, 
 
 etc. . -344 
 
 G. The laying-on of hands ..... 349 
 H. Montanism ....... 355 
 
 I. Prophecy in the Christian Church .... 359 
 K. The origin of the titles ' bishop,' ' presbyter, 3 and ' deacon,' 
 
 with reference to recent criticism . . . 363 
 
 L. The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles . . . 374 
 
 M. Dr. Hort's view of the Apostolate .... 382 
 
 INDEX . . . . . . .386
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE FOUNDATION OF THE CHURCH. 
 
 THE reader of the history of Christendom cannot The subject 
 fail to be conscious, at each stage of his subject, of fn 
 the prominent position held in the Church by a 
 Ministry, which is regarded as having a divine 
 authority for its stewardship of Christian mysteries 
 an authority which is indeed limited in sphere by 
 varying political and ecclesiastical arrangements, but 
 which in itself is believed to be derived not from 
 below but from above, and to represent and perpetuate, 
 by due succession from the Apostles, the institution 
 of Christ. It is this Christian ministry which is to 
 be the subject of the present inquiry. We shall 
 endeavour to ascertain its history, to trace it back 
 through its series of changes to the fountain-head. 
 More than this, we shall endeavour to investigate its 
 authority and search into its title-deeds. Is this 
 ministry, with its claim of an apostolic succession, the 
 mere product of circumstances valuable just so far 
 as it is found spiritually convenient? As claiming 
 to be a priesthood, does it represent a temporary 
 accommodation of the Christian ideal, more or less 
 necessitated by circumstances, to the Jewish or pagan 
 ideas amidst which the Church spread? Is it a 
 temporary restriction of the free Christian spirit 
 dangerous, however necessary? Or, on the contrary, 
 
 A
 
 2 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 is it an original portion of Christ's foundation ? Is 
 the episcopal succession, as it meets us in history, 
 simply the fulfilment of Christ's intention, an essential 
 and inviolable element of Christianity till the end ? 
 
 These are the main questions before us questions 
 much controverted, yet not on that account incapable 
 of yielding satisfactory solutions. But, like other 
 controverted questions, these which concern the 
 Christian ministry have a tendency to run off their 
 own field and get upon territory foreign to them- 
 selves in one direction or another. It will therefore 
 Prelim, as- promote clearness if at the beginning the area of the 
 
 sumptions. , i* r n i j 
 
 present discussion is carefully marked out. 
 (t)The I- As an historical inquiry, the investigation of the 
 
 ofthe n N ne x! origtnes of the Christian ministry involves conclusions 
 as to the date and authorship of a number of docu- 
 ments. In regard to the great majority of these 
 there is no division of opinion which is of serious 
 moment for the present inquiry. But this is not the 
 case with regard to some of the documents contained 
 in the New Testament. The genuineness of the 
 Epistles of St. Peter and St. James and of the Epistle 
 of St. Paul to the Ephesians, still more the historical 
 character of the Evangelical records and of the Acts 
 of the Apostles, and the genuineness of St. Paul's 
 Pastoral Epistles, are questions of vital moment in 
 dealing with the history of the ministry. It is well 
 then, in order to narrow the field of inquiry, to make 
 it plain at starting that the genuineness of these 
 Epistles and the historical character of these records 
 are here generally assumed. True, a considerable 
 part of the inquiry is not affected by the decision in 
 one sense or another of these critical questions. But 
 in the discussion of the ministry in the apostolic age
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 3 
 
 it has great weight. 1 If a certain set of conclusions 
 is here in the main taken for granted, this is not 
 at all because it is desired to exempt the books of 
 Scripture from free criticism. It is done, because no 
 investigation is satisfactory which does not at starting 
 make plain the basis on which it rests, while a dis- 
 cussion of so large a number of critical questions 
 would occupy too much space in preliminaries. It 
 is done, then, to limit the area of inquiry ; but, it 
 must be added, with the clearest conviction that 
 the conclusions assumed are those which the facts 
 warrant. There does not seem to the present writer 
 to be good reason on the whole for doubting, for 
 instance, the unity or the genuineness of the Epistles 
 of St. Paul to the Ephesians, to Timothy, and to 
 Titus. The authorship of the Epistle to the Ephesians 
 is guaranteed, not only by the external evidence, not 
 only by its connection with the more personal Epistles 
 to the Colossians and to Philemon, but also by the 
 lofty power and richness of thought with which it 
 develops and unifies the fundamental conceptions of 
 predestination and of the Church, which St. Paul had 
 already presented in the Epistles to the Romans and 
 the Corinthians. The Pastoral Epistles are linked 
 together by intense coherence of subject and tone ; 
 and there is hardly any writing which can be more 
 
 1 Thus Professor Harnack (Expositor, May 1887) discusses the origin of the 
 Christian ministry on the assumption that not only the Pastoral Epistles but also the 
 Acts of the Apostles and the Epistle of St. James are second century documents 
 (PP- 334 n - 6 > 335 n- 1 ). an d that the Epistle to the Ephesians was written ' a consider- 
 able time after the Apostle's death ' (p. 331). As he truly says when he is proceed- 
 
 origin of certain New Testament and post-apostolic writings. Anyone, for example, 
 who admits the genuineness of the Pastoral Epistles will reach quite different con- 
 clusions from one who regards them as non-Pauline, and relegates them to the 
 second century ' (p. 322).
 
 4 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 certainly pronounced genuine by internal evidence 
 than the second Epistle to Timothy. 1 When we 
 pass to the Acts of the Apostles, there would seem 
 to be scarcely any department of literary controversy 
 in which, within recent years, we have experienced 
 more completely the reassuring effect of thorough 
 inquiry. 2 The remarkably undeveloped Christology 
 of the early chapters : the position assigned to the 
 prophets in the earliest Church : the accurate know- 
 ledge, as tested by recent investigations, which the 
 narrative displays of local geography, local sentiment, 
 and the titles of local magistrates : the reiterated 
 evidence, which the book affords in its later portions, 
 that the author was an eye-witness of what he 
 records 3 all this taken together goes to guarantee 
 the substantial accuracy of the whole record. 4 
 Further, the position assigned to the Apostles in 
 St. Paul's Epistles and in the Acts suggests or pre- 
 
 1 Prof. Salmon's vindication of the genuineness of these Epistles will, I think, be 
 considered adequate by a fair-minded and impartial reader. See his Introduction to 
 the New Testament, lecture xx. Cf. also Mr. Findlay's essay appended to Sabatier's 
 Apostle Paul (E.T., Hodder and Stoughton, 1881). 
 
 2 If this was true in 1888 when this volume first appeared, it is conspicuously more 
 true now in 1899. See A. C. Headlam in Authority and Archceology (John Murray, 
 1899), pp. 348 ff. 
 
 3 See Dr. Lightfoot's ' Illustrations of the Acts from Recent Discoveries,' Contemp. 
 Revieui(May 1878), and, especially, Prof. W. M. Ramsay's very remarkable'testimony 
 in his work, The Church in the Roman Empire before A. D. 1 70 (Hodder and Stoughton, 
 '893), Part i. Prof. Ramsay held when he wrote this work that the author of the 
 Acts used for the period of St. Paul's travels a ' travel document ' by another hand, 
 written down under the immediate influence of Paul himself, which he dates ' between 
 60-70 A.D.' But the evidence of style, etc., seems to show that the eye-witness of the 
 'we 'sections is the author of the whole. And Ramsay himself came to hold that 
 St. Luke is the author of the whole book before he wrote St. Paul the Traveller 
 and the Roman Citizen, 1895. 
 
 * On the subject of the Acts I may refer (i) to Dr. Lightfoot's article in the Diet, 
 of the Bible (Ed. 1893), and to his essay 'St. Paul and the Three' (Epistle to the 
 Galatians); (2) to Dr. Salmon's Introd. lecture xviii. ; (3) to the remarkable 
 admissions of one of the last critics amongst those who pay honour to the name of 
 Baur Dr. Pfleiderer, see his Hibbert Lectures, lect. i. ; and (4) to a more recent 
 examination of the subject in Mr. A. C. Headlam 's article ' Acts of the Apostles ' in 
 Hastings' Dictionary of the Bible (Clarks, 1898).
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 5 
 
 supposes some such dealings of Christ with them 
 in particular as the Gospels record. Once again, 
 then (for this reason and in virtue of all the body of 
 considerations which make for the trustworthiness 
 of the evangelical records), it is here taken for granted 
 without scruple that Jesus Christ did really give in 
 substance those instructions and commissions to His 
 Apostles and to His Church, both before and after 
 His Resurrection, which He is recorded to have given 
 in the narratives of St. Matthew, St. Mark, St. Luke, 
 and St. John. 1 It is then from no fear of free 
 
 1 The authenticity of St. John's Gospel has been sufficiently vindicated of recent 
 years by Professor Godet and Dr. Westcott. See also Prof. Sanday's articles in the 
 Expositor of Nov. 1891, and following Nos., ' The present position of the Johannean 
 question. ' 
 
 With reference to a point of some importance for the subject of the ministry in 
 St. Matthew's Gospel our Lord's commission to St. Peter Prof. Harnack has 
 argued (Contewp. Review, Aug. 1886, ' The Present State of Research in Early 
 Church History,' p. 230) that an earlier version of the narrative is preserved in the 
 text of Tatian's Diatessaron. We have in Armenian St. Ephraem's Commentary on 
 this Harmony of the Gospels. In the Latin translation of this (Evangelii Con- 
 cordantis Expositio facta a S. Ephraento, in Lat. trans, a R. P. Aucher, Mechi- 
 tarista, ed. Moesinger, Venice, 1876, pp. 153, 154) the words run: Beatus es 
 Simon, et portae inferi te non vincent. Afterwards the words Tu es petra 
 are quoted. Here it appears that it is against St. Peter that the gates of death 
 are not to prevail, and nothing is said of the foundation of the Church. But we 
 have not the whole text of the Diatessaron ', St. Ephraem only quotes it to com- 
 ment on it. Nor does he always quote it fully. In this case he gives no hint of 
 the words Tu es petra till afterwards, out of their order. Elsewhere it is mani- 
 fest that he does not quote the whole text ; see his comments on St. John, as 
 incorporated in the Harmony (pp. 145-153) ; and again (p. 66) on the Sermon on the 
 Mount, where the quoted text of St. Matt. v. 22-32 runs thus : ' Sed ego dico 
 vobis : qui dicit fratri suo, fatue . . . qui dicit fratri suo, vilis aut stulte. . . . 
 Audistis quia dictum est : non adulterabis, sed ego dico vobis : quicunque aspicit et 
 concupiscit, adulterat. Si manus tua vel pes tuus scandalizet te . . .' St. Ephraem 
 does not by any means quote the whole text ; but he refers to more than he quotes. 
 Thus in the passage under discussion, if we reconstruct his text from his commen- 
 tary (Dominus cum ecclesiam suam aedificaret, etc., p. 154), it must have run to 
 this effect : ' Blessed art thou, Simon. Thou art Peter, and on this rock I will build 
 My Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against thee.' The 'thee' 
 may be due simply to the ' it' (avrijs) being referred to n-erpo and not to <Ai)tria, 
 a reference which Origen iti loco discusses. St. Ephraem or Tatian accepted this 
 reference and, interpreting the rock of St. Peter, glossed OUTTJS as equivalent to 
 a-ov. There are no traces of any "such reading as Harnack imagines to have existed 
 in the Greek or in the Syriac versions (either Cureton's or the Peshitto), which have 
 our text. See Zahn's Diatessaron, pp. 163-4 (in h' s Forschungen, i Th., Erlangen, 
 1881).
 
 6 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 criticism that the authenticity and trustworthiness 
 
 of these New Testament documents is here assumed. 
 
 (2) The truth 2. It will be also taken for granted that the apo- 
 
 ot the In- i 
 
 carnation, stolic interpretation of the Person of Christ is the 
 true one that He was the Incarnate Son of God. 
 It is important to make this plain, because, though 
 little stress will be laid upon this doctrine, yet our 
 rational attitude towards the development of Chris- 
 tian institutions depends to a certain extent upon 
 our relation to it. 1 The Incarnation represents 
 necessarily a climax in the divine self-revelation. It 
 represents this necessarily, because no closer relation 
 of God to man is conceivable than that involved in 
 the ' Word Who is God made flesh ' in the histori- 
 cal Person, Christ Jesus, in such sense that ' he who 
 hath seen Him hath seen the Father.' God cannot 
 come any nearer to man, man cannot come any nearer 
 to God than is effected in Him, in Whom 'dwelleth all 
 the fulness of the Godhead bodily.' This is ' the end 
 of the days.' As M. Godet strikingly observes : ' The 
 history of the world (from the Christian point of 
 view) is summarized in its essence in these three 
 words : He is coming : He is come : He is coming 
 again.' 2 The development then of God's revelation 
 of Himself comes to its climax in the Incarnation. 
 Henceforth another sort of development begins. All 
 institutions, all races, all individuals are gradually 
 brought into the light of Christ and judged by their 
 relation to Him. Christ develops Himself as the 
 
 1 For example, it seems a grave critical defect in Dr. Hatch's Bampton Lectures, 
 The Organization of the Early Christian. Churches, that, as he has not explained 
 his relation to certain most significant New Testament documents, so also he has 
 not made it plain whether he really believes the ' supernatural ' character of the 
 Person of Christ. If he does, then his propositions about the merely 'natural' 
 development of Christian institutions will surely want correcting (lecture i. p. 18). 
 
 * tudes Bibliques, N. T. p. 291.
 
 I.] The Foundation of tlie Church. 7 
 
 Second Adam, realizing the capacities of all human- 
 ity by bringing it all, age by age, race by race, indi- 
 vidual by individual, into relation to Himself, till He 
 can ' come again,' in the revelation of the glory of 
 the sons of God, as the acknowledged centre and 
 head of humanity and of the universe. 
 
 It is not here proposed to inquire whether analogies 
 will be found in other departments of evolution 'to 
 what has taken place in the history of religion. This 
 is a large question, which does not belong to our 
 present subject. But the general theory of evolution 
 must, of course, like every other generalization, mould 
 itself to the facts. It must take account, among 
 other things, of religious facts. Now in the history 
 of religion a term has, in a certain sense, been reached 
 in the past. The Christian moral standard, the Chris- 
 tian character claims to be essentially final. The Per- 
 sonality of Christ, as it finds expression in His own 
 language and action and in the belief about Him of 
 His earliest disciples, 1 represents finality. Thus also 
 the grace of His Spirit is the fulness of grace, 
 adequate for all ages and all men ; and the truth 
 revealed in Him is ' a faith once for all delivered/ 
 simple and universal, which is to mould human 
 character to the end. 2 
 
 Plainly, then, the rational acceptance of this 
 position about Christ gives us certain premises or 
 presuppositions with reference to the institutions 
 which perpetuate the presence, and represent the 
 will and mind, of Christ. A ' once for all delivered ' 
 faith and a once for all covenanted grace associate 
 
 1 I may refer to Dr. Sanday's What the First Christians thought about Christ 
 (Oxford House Papers) and to the argument in Mr. Stanton's Jewish and Christian 
 Messiah p. 154 f. 
 
 2 See Dr. Westcott's Christus Consitmmator pp. 124 f. 151 f.
 
 8 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 themselves naturally with a once for all instituted 
 society and a once for all established ministry. The 
 question whether 'the Christian societies, and the 
 confederation of those societies which we commonly 
 speak of in a single phrase as " the visible Church of 
 Christ," were formed without any special interposition 
 of that mysterious and extraordinary action of the 
 divine volition, which, for want of a better term, we 
 speak of as " supernatural," ' l is rationally conditioned 
 by the question whether the manifestation of the 
 Christ is of this order. A supernatural cause sug- 
 gests supernatural effects. Nothing will be assumed 
 here about the Church and the ministry. The con- 
 clusions shall be drawn strictly from the evidence. 
 But belief in the Incarnation opens our eyes to give 
 due weight to the evidence. 
 
 Now on the basis of these assumptions a question 
 arises, which must be determined before the proper 
 subject of the present inquiry can be approached. 
 Did Christ found a Church in the sense of a visible 
 society ? 2 
 
 That He should have done so is intelligible enough. 
 As it has recently been said, 3 ' it is only by becoming 
 
 1 Hatch B. L. p. 18. On p. 20, the author says the Church ' is divine as the solar 
 system is divine. 1 Now inasmuch as the Church is a human society, he must mean 
 that it is divine, as the British constitution or the Roman empire is divine. But if 
 Christ be personally God, if in virtue of a divine life He burst the tomb and rose the 
 third day from the dead, the society to which He gave birth may presumably be 
 divine in another sense not as exempted from ' the universe of law,' but because it 
 belongs to that kingdom of law in which effects are relative to causes. 
 
 - 'For although it is indisputable that our Lord founded a Church, it is an 
 unproved assumption that that Church is an aggregation of visible or organized 
 societies; and although it is clear that our Lord instituted the rite of Christian 
 baptism, it is an unproved assumption that baptism was at the outset, as it has 
 become since, not merely a sign of discipleship, but also a ceremony of initiation into 
 a divine society ' (Hatch B. L. pref. sec. ed. p. xii). To the idea that the Church is 
 'a visible society, or aggregation of societies,' is opposed the idea that it is ' synony- 
 mous with the elect.' 
 
 3 The Christian Church by R. W. Church, Dean of St. Paul's, (Oxford House 
 Papers, No. xvii.) pp. 4, 5, 15.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church, 9 
 
 embodied in the undoubting convictions of a society, 
 by being, as it were, assimilated with its mind and 
 motives that is to say, with living human minds 
 and wills and informing all its actions, that ideas 
 have reality, and possess power, and become more 
 than dry and lifeless thoughts.' ' As great moral and 
 social and political ideas are preserved in life and 
 force by being embodied in the common and living 
 convictions of the society which we call the State, 
 so great spiritual ideas, which are the offspring of 
 Christianity, are preserved in life and force by be- 
 coming the recognised beliefs and motives of the 
 society which we call the Church.' Christianity 
 would never have done what it has done in the 
 world, if it had been a mere body of abstract truth, 
 like a philosophy, to be apprehended by this or that 
 individual. It would never have done what it has 
 done, if it had been embodied only in a book or 
 collection of books. It has lived on, and worked 
 upon men, as a society or group of societies. This, 
 of course, everybody would admit. The question 
 is whether believers in Christ were left to organize 
 themselves in societies by the natural attraction of 
 sympathy in beliefs and aims, and are, therefore, 
 still at liberty to organize themselves on any model 
 which seems from time to time to promise the best 
 results, or whether the divine Founder of the Christian 
 religion Himself instituted a society, a brotherhood, 
 to be the home of the grace and truth which He 
 came to bring to men : so that becoming His disciple, 
 meant from the first this in a real sense this only 
 incorporation into His society. If this was the case, 
 the Church was not created by men, nor can it be 
 recreated from time to time in view of varying cir-
 
 IO Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 cumstances. It comes upon men from above. It 
 makes the claim of a divine institution. It has the 
 authority of Christ. Christ did not, according to 
 this view, encourage His disciples to form societies ; 
 He instituted a society for them to belong to as the 
 means of belonging to Him. 1 
 
 Now, as we watch the history of Christendom, we 
 discern 'a great number of organized religious 
 bodies owing their existence and their purpose to 
 Christian belief and Christian ideas ' ; but in the 
 midst of these we discern also something incom- 
 parably more permanent and more universal one 
 great continuous body the Catholic Church. There 
 it is ; none can overlook its visible existence, let us 
 say from the time when Christianity emerges out of 
 the gloom of the sub-apostolic age down to the 
 period of the Reformation. And all down this 
 period of its continuous life this society makes a 
 constant and unmistakeable claim. It claims to have 
 been instituted as the home of the new covenant of 
 salvation by the Incarnate Son of God. Is the 
 claim which this visible Catholic Church has made 
 a just one ? This is our present question : we are 
 not asking yet whether the Church has any particular 
 form of polity by divine institution, but whether the 
 thing itself the visible society is the handiwork 
 intrinsic of Christ. This much we premise : that it would 
 be nothing extraordinary if Christ did institute a 
 Church. It is reasonable to think that, 2 if He came 
 
 1 Of course this antithesis requires guarding. The supernatural influence in the 
 genesis of the Church did not annihilate ' the natural inclination which all men have 
 unto sociable life': but it controlled and intensified it. This consilience of the 
 natural and supernatural is beautifully expressed by Hooker, E.P. i. 15. 2. 
 
 2 Cf. the measured words of Butler, Analogy pt. 11. ch. i : ' As Christianity served 
 these ends and purposes, when it was first published, by the miraculous publication 
 itself, so it was intended to serve the same purposes in future ages by means of the
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. it 
 
 to leave among mankind the inestimable treasures 
 of redemptive truth and grace, He would not have 
 cast them abroad among men, but would have given 
 them a stable home in a visible and duly con- 
 stituted society a society simple enough in its 
 principles to be capable of adaptation to the 
 varying needs of ages and nations and individ- 
 uals, simple enough to be catholic, but organized 
 enough to take its place amidst the institutions 
 of the world with a recognisable and permanent 
 character. 
 
 But, as a fact, does history record that He did witness of 
 act thus? The affirmative answer to this question 
 shall be given first by exhibiting the impressive 
 unanimity with which the early Christians believed 
 that He did : secondly, by making it plain that the 
 existence of the visible Church was not due to 
 external ' secular ' influences : lastly ', by supporting 
 the position from the evidence of the New Testa- 
 ment, especially of the Gospels. 
 
 (i) It is plain that the visible society admits of (0 Early 
 
 ,.,.-. ,. . Christian 
 
 being differently represented, according as it is re- belief 
 garded as the home of divine grace, uniting men 
 by the Spirit through Christ to God and to one 
 another ; or as the kingdom of truth, maintaining 
 
 settlement of a visible Church ; of a society distinguished from common ones and 
 from the rest of the world, by peculiar religious institutions, by an instituted method 
 of instruction and an instituted form of external religion. Miraculous powers were 
 given to the first preachers of Christianity, in order to their introducing it into the 
 world : a visible Church was established in order to continue it, and carry it on 
 successfully throughout all ages. . . . To prevent (Christianity being sunk and 
 forgotten in a very few ages], appears to have been one reason why a visible Church 
 was instituted ; to be like a city upon a hill, a standing memorial to the world o 
 the duty which we owe our Maker, to call men continually ... to attend to it, and 
 by the form of religion ever before their eyes, remind them of the reality ; to be the 
 repository of the oracles of God } to hold up the light of revelation . . . and pro- 
 pagate it throughout all generations to the end of the world.' Cf. also the general 
 argument of his Charge to the Clergy of Durham ,
 
 12 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 the ' witness of Jesus ' ; or as the organ of divine 
 authority, guiding and disciplining the lives of men. 
 But it is equally plain that such modes of repre- 
 senting the Church are not at all incompatible with 
 one another, and all of them equally postulate the 
 visibility of the Church. 
 
 We proceed then to trace up the different lines of 
 tradition in the Church so as to show that the differ- 
 ence of colour put upon Christian truth by the 
 varieties of spiritual temperament and the varying 
 claims of circumstance did not affect this central 
 position. And as, of recent years, considerable 
 originality has been assigned to the 'Augustinian 
 theory ' of the Church, 1 we will make a beginning 
 
 in the West: with the Church of St. Augustin the Church of 
 Africa. Now, whatever novelty there may have 
 been in Augustin's presentation of the matter, 2 at 
 least he did not originate the idea of a visible Church. 
 Let us take our earliest representative of African 
 
 Tertuiiian. Christianity, Tertullian (at the end of the second 
 century), and listen to what he teaches on the sub- 
 ject, in argument with the Gnostics, giving it as the 
 one thing certain, whatever may be matter for 
 question. 
 
 1 E.g. by Dr. Hatch I.e. pp. xii, xiii. 
 
 2 St. Augustin's doctrine of the Church is thus stated by Mr. Cunningham (St. 
 Austin, p. 116) : 'The kingdom of God was not a mere hope, but a present reality, 
 not a mere name for a divine idea, but an institution, duly organized among men, 
 subsisting ;from one generation to another ; closely inter-connected with earthly 
 rule, with definite guidance to give, and a definite part to take in all the affairs of 
 actual life. To him the kingdom of God was an actual Polity, just as the Roman 
 Empire was a Polity too: it was "visible" in just the same way as the earthly 
 State, for it was a real institution with definite organization, with a recognised 
 constitution, with a code of laws and means of enforcing them, with property for 
 its uses, and officers to direct it.' This would represent what is meant by ' the 
 Augustinian theory.' But in fact St. Augustin's relation to the idea of the Church 
 is a complex one. On the whole he intended to spiritualize rather than materialize 
 it : cf. Hermann Reuter Augustinische Stutiien, esp. pp. 101, 150-1, 485 ff.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 1 3 
 
 ' Christ Jesus our Lord,' he says, 1 ' so long as He was living on earth, 
 spoke Himself either openly to the people or apart to His disciples. 
 From amongst these He had attached to His person twelve especially, 
 who were destined to be the teachers of the nations. Accordingly, 
 when one of these had fallen away, the remaining eleven received His 
 command, as He was departing to the Father after His Resurrection, 
 to go and teach the nations, who were to be baptized into the Father 
 and the Son and the Holy Spirit. At once, then, the Apostles (whose 
 mission this title indicates), after adding Matthias to their number as 
 the twelfth in the place of Judas on the authority of the prophecy in 
 David's psalm, and after receiving the promised strength of the Holy 
 Ghost to enable them to work miracles and preach, first of all bore 
 witness to the faith in Judaea and established Churches, and afterwards 
 going out into the world proclaimed the same teaching of the same 
 faith to the nations, and forthwith founded Churches in every city, from 
 which all other Churches in their turn have received the tradition of 
 the faith and the seeds of doctrine ; yes, and are daily receiving, that 
 they may become Churches ; and it is on this account that they too 
 will be reckoned apostolic, as being the offspring of apostolic Churches. 
 Every kind of thing must be referred to its origin. Accordingly, many 
 and great as are the Churches, yet all is that one first Church which is 
 from the Apostles, that one whence all are derived. So all are the first, 
 and all are apostolic, while all together prove their unity : while the 
 fellowship of peace and the title of brotherhood and the interchange of 
 hospitality remain amongst them rights which are based on no other 
 principle than the one handing down of the same faith.' 
 
 Here we have a perfectly clear conception of the 
 
 1 de Praescr. 20 : Christus lesus, Dominus noster, permittat dicere interim, quis- 
 quis est, cuiuscunque dei fill us, cuiuscunque materiae homo et deus, . . . quamdiu 
 in terris agebat, ipse pronuntiabat sive populo palam sive discentibus secrsum, ex 
 quibus duodecim praecipuos later! suo allegerat destinatos nationibus magistros. 
 Itaque uno eorum decusso reliquos undecim digrediens ad Patrem post resurrec- 
 tionem iussit ire et docere nationes tinguendas in Patrem et Filium et in Spiritum 
 sanctum. Statim igitur apostoli, quos haec appellatio missos interpretatur, assumpto 
 per sortem duodecimo Matthia in locum ludae ex auctoritate prophetiae quae est 
 in psalmo David, consecuti promissam vim Spiritus sancti ad virtutes et eloquium, 
 primo per ludaeam contestata fide in lesum Christum ecclesiis institutis, dehinc 
 in orbem profecti eandem doctrinam eiusdem fidei nationibus promulgaverunt. 
 Et proinde ecclesias apud unamquamque civitatem condiderunt, a quibus traducem 
 fidei et semina doctrinae ceterae exinde ecclesiae mutuatae sunt, et quotidie mutu- 
 antur, ut ecclesiae fiant. Ac per hoc et ipsae apostolicae deputabuntur, ut soboles 
 apostolicarum ecclesiarum. Omne genus ad originem suam censeatur necesse est. 
 Itaque tot ac tantae ecclesiae una est ilia ab apostolis prima, ex qua omnes. Sic 
 omnes primae et omnes apostolicae, dum una omnes probant unitatem. Communi- 
 catio pacis et appellatio fraternitatis et contesseratio hospitalitatis, quae iura non 
 alia ratio regit, quam eiusdem sacrament! una traditio.'
 
 14 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 one catholic Church, 1 founded in fulfilment of Christ's 
 intentions by His immediate ambassadors, of which 
 every local Church is the representative for a par- 
 ticular area. Behind 'the Churches,' and prior to 
 them in idea is the one Church which each embodies. 2 
 Thus the Church is to Tertullian's mind God's insti- 
 tution for man's education and salvation. To the 
 Church belong the Scriptures ; so utterly in fact does 
 he refuse to separate the books of the Church from 
 herself that he declines, in theory at least, even to 
 argue as to the meaning of the Scriptures with those 
 outside the Church, because they do not belong to 
 them. So little does he conceive of the Christian 
 religion as an abstract doctrine written in a Book ! 3 
 
 It was, then, through membership in this one 
 apostolic Church, catholic and local, that African 
 Christians believed themselves to inherit the grace 
 of Christ. Communion with God depended on com- 
 munion with His Church. ' He cannot have God for 
 his father,' Cyprian is fond of emphasizing, 4 ' who has 
 
 1 Second century writers speak of the Church as actually catholic so strong is 
 their sense that it is meant to be so i.e. they speak of the Church as having spread 
 universally. Cf. TTO.VTO. TO, eOtn/) TO. VTTO TOP ovpavbv KOLTQIKOVVTO., aKOvtravTa Kai 
 vitrrevfavTa. . . . icA>j0T)<ra>> (Hernias Sim. ix. 17) ; ^ e/ocArjcria . . . Kara TTJS oAjjs 
 oi<cov/if IT;? ea>s irepariav rijs )>>) SuoTrapjmeVi) (Iren. i. 10. i) ; ' expansa in universum 
 mundum ' (ib. iv. 36. 2) ', y KO.TO. Tyv oiicov/ieVT)' KodoAixr) exxArja-ia (Mart. Polyc. 8). 
 
 2 The thought of salvation in the Church is so prominent in Tertullian's mind that 
 he finds it in the Lord's Prayer. Speaking of the title ' Father,' he says (fie Orat. 2) : 
 'Appellatio ista et pietatis et potestatis est. Item in Patre Filius invocatur ; Ego 
 enim, inquit, et Pater unum sumus. Ne mater quidem ecclesia praeteritur. 
 Sequidem in filio et patre mater recognoscitur, de qua constat et patris et filii 
 nomen. 1 
 
 3 de Praescr. 19 : ' Ergo non ad scripturas provocandum est, nee in his constitu- 
 endum certamen, in quihus aut nulla aut incerta victoria est, aut parum certa. Nam 
 etsi non ita evaderet collatio scripturarum, ut utramque partem parem sisteret, ordo 
 rerum desiderabat illud prius proponi, quod nunc solum disputandum est : quibus 
 competat fides ipsa, cuius sint scripturae.' 
 
 4 Ep. Ixxiv. 7 : ' Ubi et ex qua et cui natus est, qui films ecclesiae non est ? ut 
 habere quis possit Deum patrem, habeat ante ecclesiam matrem. 1 Cf. Ep. Iv. 24 : 
 ' Quisque ille est et qualiscunque est, Christianus non est qui in Christi ecclesia non 
 est.' Ep. Ixxiii. 21 : ' Salus extra ecclesiam non est.' Cyprian's conception of the 
 bishop constituting the Church will be brought out later.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 15 
 
 not the Church for his mother.' ' Dost thou believe ' 
 so runs the baptismal interrogation in St. Cyprian's 
 day *( m ) t ne remission of sins and eternal life 
 through the holy Church ? ' l 
 
 There is no reason to think that such a question 
 would have startled or shocked the faithful in any 
 part of the Christian Church. Certainly Irenaeus, irenaeus 
 the bishop of Lyons, who represents the Church of ' 
 Gaul and the Churches of Asia where he had been 
 brought up, held the same belief in the Church and 
 made the same exclusive claim for it. 
 
 ' In the Church," he says, ' God placed apostles, prophets, doctors, 
 and the whole operation of the Spirit, and all who do not have 
 recourse to the Church do not participate in Him, but deprive them- 
 selves of life. . . . For where the Church is there is the Spirit of God, 
 and where the Spirit of God is there is the Church and all grace.' 
 'God will judge all those who make schisms. . . . No reformation 
 can be wrought by them which can compensate for the injury of the 
 schism. God will judge all those who are outside the truth that is, 
 who are outside the Church.' ' The Church has been planted as the 
 paradise in this world : so then, of every tree of the paradise ye shall 
 eat, says the Spirit of God that is, of every Scripture of the Lord.' 2 
 
 1 Ep. Ixix. 7 : ' Credis remissionem peccatorum et vitam aetemam per sanctam 
 ecclesiam?' Ep. Ixx. 2 : ' Credis in vitam aeternam et remissionem peccatorum per 
 sanctam ecclesiam ? ' 
 
 Dr. Westcott (Historic Faith, Note iii. p. 186) does not notice the latter form. 
 Previously (p. 116) he lays stress on the idea that 'we do not say we believe in ' the 
 Church : we believe only ' that it is. This distinction comes from Rufinus ; cf. his 
 Commentary on the Creed 36 : ' hac itaque praepositionis syllaha Creator a 
 creaturis secernitur et divina separantur ab humanis.' Cf. St. Augustin de Fide et 
 Symbolo 21. But this would apply neither to all the western Creeds (see, in Heurtley's 
 Harmonia Symbolica, Creeds xix, xxvi, xxvii, xxx, xxxvii-viii, and the early 
 Spanish Creed in Priscillian Tract, ii. p. 36), nor to the eastern form of the Con- 
 stantinopolitan Creed (the form of most authority in the Church) with the earlier 
 eastern Creeds (see Pearson On the Creed art. ix, notes 52, 53 ; and Westcott I.e. 
 p. 195). It is therefore surely impossible to lay stress on it. 
 
 2 Irenaeus' conception of the organization of the Church is presented later. The 
 passages here quoted are iii. 24. x (quoted below, p. 109) ; 
 
 iv. 33. 7 : ' "Avcucpii'ei Je TOVJ TO. a\i<rntna. p-yao/j.eVovs, itevovs ovra<: TTJS TOU fleou 
 dyamjs <cai TO IStov Avo*iTeAts <7KO ouiTas, aAAa fLrf TTfv fv<o<ril> Tryi eKxArjo-ias 1 cat 
 id /iixpas <cal Tas [rvxov<rat] curi'dc'TO /xe'-ya xai fvSoov crdijiaroC Xpio-roC re'/n'oiras 
 KOI Siatpovtrat icai oaov TO CTT* avrol? avaipovvraf . . . ovSfHut 5e TT)AiicavT7| 
 SvpaTai Trpos auTu> KaTOf>wori; ycpc'o'dat, /jAiicr) TOU a\io>iaT6s f<mv 17
 
 16 Christian Ministry. [CHAP, 
 
 (recognition it might be asked how St. Irenaeus reconciles this 
 
 also of God s 
 
 Y id 3 r , exclusive claim which he makes for the Church with 
 
 dealings). 
 
 a truth to which he also gives expression namely, 
 that God's revelation of Himself through His Son, 
 Who is the Eternal Word, ' the Light which lighteneth 
 every man,' is in a sense universal, and that in order 
 to the apprehension of this universal revelation there 
 is a universal capacity for faith which is exhibited 
 in all moral obedience to God wherever found. 1 
 Irenaeus teaches this, with the Alexandrians and 
 with Justin Martyr. 2 With the last-named father he 
 would, no doubt, recognise all who, even in heathen 
 lands as well as among the Jews, ' lived or live with 
 right reason,' as the friends of Christ' the Eternal 
 
 ludicabit autem et omnes cos qui sunt extra veritatem, id est qui sunt extra 
 ecclesiam.' 
 
 v. 20. a: ' Fiigere igitur oportet sententias ipsorum [haereticorum] . . . confugere 
 autem ad ecclesiam, et in eius sinu educari, et dominicis scripturis enutriri. Plan- 
 tata est enim ecclesia paradisus in hoc mundo. Ab omni ergo ligno paradisi escas 
 manducabitis, ait Spiritus Dei ; id est, ab omni scriptura dominica manducate.' 
 
 The connection in the mind of the early Church between schism and heresy is 
 very close. The fundamental idea of heresy is that of self-willed separatism or 
 particularism. Cf. Rothe Anfange der christlichen Kircht 53 p. 563 f. and 
 pseudo-Athan. Diet, et Interpret. Parabol. Evang. qu. 38 (quoted by Rothe I.e. 
 p. 566) IldOec Ae'yerai aiptcris ; aird roO aipeiadai TI IStov, Kai TOVTO eaic6\ovOeiv. 
 This expresses the primitive idea. 
 
 1 Iren. iv. 6. 5, 7: 'Et ad hoc Filium revelavit Pater, ut per eum omnibus 
 manifestetur et eos quidem, qui credunt ei iusti, in incorruptelam et in aeternum 
 refrigerium recipiat ; credere autem ei, est facere eius voluntatem. . . . Nemo 
 cognoscit . . . Patrem, nisi Filius et quibuscunque Filius revelaverit. Reve- 
 laverit enim non solum in futurum dictum est, quasi tune inceperit Verbum mani- 
 festare Patrem, cum de Maria natus ; sed communiter per totum tempus positum 
 est. Ab initio enim assistens Filius suo plasmati, revelat omnibus Patrem, quibus 
 vult et quando vult et quemadmodum vult Pater ; et propter hoc in omnibus et per 
 omnia unus Deus Pater et unum Verbum Filius et unus Spiritus et una salus 
 omnibus credentibus in eum.' 
 
 Kai 'HpaKAeiTOs Kai oi 6/uoiot avrois, iv /3ap/3apoi{ fit 'AjSpaafi xai 'Acacia; Kai 
 ' Afapias xai MtcraijA Kai 'HAta; Kai aAAoi iroAAoi, a>c rum irpafeis i; ra ocdjuara 
 KaraAeyeti/ /jiaxpoc cicai C7rio^rdju.ecot racvc irapairoufieda. axTre Kai oi irpoyecdjixecoi 
 acev Adyov /3iu<racT? dxpT/crroi Kai t^flpoi TU> Xptorip *;trai/ Kai </)Ocei? rue fiera Adyou 
 ^lOiicTiov oi fie fiera Adyov /Siuaacref Kai /Siovcrcf Xpio~Tiacoi Kai a^o/Sot Kai
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 1 7 
 
 Reason, and even as ' Christians.' How would he 
 reconcile such a position with the exclusive claim of 
 the Church ? Probably by holding that all who had 
 not had the opportunity of becoming members of 
 the Church while on earth would, if they had been 
 true to their light, be received into the Church in 
 Paradise. At any rate the reconciliation was not 
 effected by the idea of an invisible Church to which 
 they belonged an invisible Church containing the 
 true servants of God whether they belonged to the 
 visible Church or not. Neither the existence of good 
 men outside the Church, nor the presence of bad men 
 inside it, ever drove the Christian Fathers, whether 
 eastern or western, to this hypothesis. 1 
 
 1 The Church on earth was regarded as subdivided into false and true members 
 the latter constituting the Kupc'ws fKK.\T\<ria. of Origen, the corpus Christi verum 
 of Jerome and Augustin. Neither of these (as Rothe, Anfange, etc., p. 618 n. 44, 
 remarks) 'agrees with the invisible Church of the Protestants.' The point of 
 difference is specially this, that, whereas the members of the ' invisible Church ' are 
 regarded as belonging indifferently to any or no ecclesiastical unity, with Origen 
 and Augustin the conception is the opposite. The membership in the ' true Church ' 
 depends upon membership in the visible Church on earth. The true Church is a 
 subdivision of the actual Church its genuine members. For 'non omnes qui 
 tenent ecclesiam, tenent et vitam aeternam ' (Augustin de Bapt. v. 20) ; ' multi . . . 
 sunt in sacramentorum communione cum ecclesia, et iam non sunt in ecclesia ' (de 
 Unit. Eccl. 74). See further Rothe An/ange 61, esp. pp. 612 ff. and Stanton's 
 Jewish and Christian Messiah, p. 230 : ' Let me premise that I think the distinction 
 cannot be maintained, which was first introduced by the theology of the sixteenth 
 century [' the idea appears pretty fully developed in Wiklif,' footnote], between a 
 visible and invisible Church in this world, the latter consisting only of the truly 
 godly. Not only is such a distinction uncountenanced by Scripture, but the very 
 idea of a Church is that of a Society which has its officers and its organisation. It 
 is a contradiction in terms to call a number of individuals a Church who are not 
 united together in a body. The moment they do begin to unite, by virtue of their 
 common supposed characteristic of genuine godliness, they cease to be invisible. 
 There have been such attempts to form a pure Church ; but history and the warn- 
 ings of our Lord Himself have taught us what to think of them.' Of course the 
 greater part of the Church is to us invisible, but that is because its members are no 
 longer on earth, and they enjoy ' perfect fellowship with one another, as well as 
 with their Lord.' Cf. also William Law's Third Letter to the Bishop of Bangor, at 
 the beginning a powerful and racy passage. Of course the truth that the Church 
 is a visible society, containing evil as well as good, is involved in our Lord's 
 language in the parables of the Net_ gathering of every kind and the Field of 
 wheat and tares : it is involved also in St. Paul's whole conception of the Church 
 and of ' the saints, 1 that is the Christians as bound to holiness by the consecration 
 
 B
 
 1 8 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 The Roman From Africa and Gaul we come to the great west- 
 
 Church. 
 
 ern centre Rome. Certainly the idea of the visible 
 Church and its unity was prominent there at the 
 
 victor time when Victor, the bishop, attempted to excom- 
 municate the Churches of Asia for keeping Easter 
 after their own specially Johannine tradition. He 
 endeavoured, says Eusebius, 1 ' to cut them off from 
 the common unity ' and make them ' utterly excom- 
 municate.' He was reproved by Irenaeus for intro- 
 ducing into the Church the idea of a rigid uniformity, 
 in place of the common faith, as the bond of union. 
 He is reminded how, in the middle of the century, 
 his predecessor Anicetus had kept his fellowship 
 with the Asiatic Polycarp, in spite of their difference 
 as to this particular custom 'those who observed 
 it, and those who did not, keeping the peace of the 
 whole Church.' 
 
 Hermas. But we may go back in the same Church at least 2 
 
 to the earlier part of the second century, to the days 
 of Hermas, the seer of the Shepherd. In his visions 
 the Church is represented as an aged lady, who 
 appears to Hermas, and ' through whom he receives 
 visions and revelations.' She is aged, it is explained 
 to him, because ' she is the first creation of God, on 
 whose account the world was made.' 3 The Church is 
 
 laid upon them in virtue of being baptized members of Christ, but not necessarily 
 holy. Still it was only when the long repose of the last parts of the second century 
 and the first half of the third made the Christian profession popular and easy, that the 
 full weight of the problem came upon the Church. In part there was a disposition 
 to meet it by rigorous discipline, passing into an impatient refusal to tolerate the 
 ' mixed ' condition of the Church ; and this was a fruitful source of schism. In 
 part stress was laid upon the Church on earth being only an outpost of a celestial 
 society (cf. Tertull. de Baft. 15 una ecclesia in caelis), an earthly image of it 
 (cf. Clem. Alex. Strom, iv. 8. 66 tliuav -rift ovpaviov KicA)(rt'as >j eiri'yeios), or a pre- 
 paration-ground for it : and thus necessarily imperfect. 
 
 1 Euseb. H. E. v. 2. 
 
 2 See further on the date, in chap. vi. 
 
 3 Vis. ii. 4: Tiji' irpfa-pvrepav, nap' fa sAo|3 TO /3i/Uc5tor, vivo. Soxeis eiixu ; eyu 
 <frTj|Hi- TTJI> 2t/3vAAav nAaveurat, faaiv, OVK coriv. Ti's ovv taTiV ; <<")fii. 'H
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 19 
 
 here thought of as in a way existing from the begin- 
 ning in the purpose of God, in the ideal world. But 
 this divine Idea has become a fact. The actual 
 Church, made up of those yet alive and of some who 
 have departed in the faith of Christ, is represented to 
 Hermas under the figure of a tower with a marvellous 
 unity, which is being built by the angels of God upon 
 the waters of baptism, the stones which are used for 
 the tower, and those which are rejected, representing 
 all sorts of men. 1 This actual Church which is in 
 process of being constructed is declared to be identical 
 with the ideal Church. What existed before in idea 
 is now real. 2 And this real, visible Church is the 
 only way of salvation. 'When the tower is finished, 
 those who have not yet repented can no longer find 
 place, but will be cast out.' 3 There is another vision 
 of the building of the tower to the same effect. 4 In 
 this it is made plain that the Church in its present 
 state is imperfect. Many, who had been gathered 
 out of all nations ' into the one body,' have fallen 
 away and been cast out for awhile or for ever. Those 
 who are members of the Church at present are evil as 
 well as good ; many will have to be cast out ; and 
 thus the Church as a whole will at the last be purified 
 
 tic(cAr)crta, cJ>T)crii'. tlirov avria' Atari ovv vpetrfivTfpaL ; *Ori, ^ijaiV, irairwp irpwnj 
 eicTi<T0T) - 6ta TOVTO irp<r/3uTe'po, <cai Sia. T<XVTT)I> o KO<T>IOS <c<rn)pri'<r0T). Cf. Vis. iv. i: 
 ai aTTOxoAi/iiei? Kai TO. opauara a fxoi e&ciffv fiia Trjs aytas (KK\r)<ria.s avTOV. 
 
 1 Vis. iii. 2-8. 
 
 2 The tower which is the visible Church on earth is the ideal Church which 
 appeared to Hennas, 'O fier jrupyos ov /SAe'jrei? oitcoSofnoviJifvov, fyia M'j ^ eKteAijcria, 
 17 ixftSfta-d. <roi cal vvv ica.1 TO irportpov {Vis. iii. 3). Cf. [pseudo] Clem, ad Cor. 14. If 
 Hermas' Church of the divine Idea is spoken of ' as a sort of Aeon ' (Rothe Anfdnge 
 p. 612 n. 42), it must be remembered that the Idea is actualized to Hermas, as the 
 Word is made flesh. This differentiates the Church's system from the Gnostic ; the 
 Valentinian Aeon ejcicA7)<ri'a is (by contrast) only ideal. For the Jewish form of the 
 eternal Church see Book of Enoch c. 39. 
 
 3 Vis. iii. 5. There is, however, an inferior salvation implied for some who do not 
 find place in the tower, if they repent, and after a purgatorial purification (ib. 7). 
 
 * Sim. ix. This tower is built upon the great Rock, Christ.
 
 2O Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 into complete holiness and unity. Still, as it is, the 
 Church represents God's will, God's purpose of 
 redemption ; and those who separate themselves 
 from it, separate themselves from the hope of salva- 
 tion like the covetous or the extortionate. They 
 are represented as men diseased : ' they who are 
 covered with scabs are they who denied their Lord 
 and turned not to Him, but have become dry and 
 desert-like, and cleave not to the saints of God, but, 
 isolating themselves, lose their own souls.' 1 How 
 could imagery express more strongly the idea of 
 salvation through the Church ? 2 
 
 We may go back in the same Church to a yet 
 clement earlier date, and still in the Epistle of Clement we 
 shall find, without poetry or vision, the sense of the 
 Church as vivid as possible. The Church in that 
 Epistle is a visible society, with the divine principle 
 of order stamped upon her, as upon the Church of 
 the old covenant, by God's authority, 3 and there is a 
 common tradition over the different local Churches, 
 for neglecting which that at Rome is bound to take 
 her sister at Corinth to task. The western temper 
 no doubt tended later (as will be seen) to colour the 
 idea of the Church. As the Church at Rome became 
 Latinized and came to inherit the secular preroga- 
 tives of the Roman name in addition to her own 
 spiritual privileges, no doubt her influence gave a new 
 tone the tone of secular empire to Christian insti- 
 tutions. Thus the doctrine of the Church becomes 
 
 1 Sim. ix. 26. 
 
 - The commission to Clement to send the book to the other cities (ei T efo> 
 iroAfts) implies the sense that the local Churches are essentially connected (K/V. ii. 4). 
 
 a Clem, ad Cor. 40-44 ; see further chap. vi. ' The new law of the Church ' 
 Clement ' most characteristically connected with the two models of the political and 
 military organization of the Roman state and the sacerdotal hierarchy of the Jewish 
 theocracy ' (Pfleiderer Hibbtrt Lectures p. 252).
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 21 
 
 materialized, but it is a complete mistake to suppose 
 that the conception of the Church, or of the visible 
 unity of the Church, was at all western in origin. 
 
 Ignatius of Antioch was a thorough oriental, and he in the East 
 writes to Churches which inherit the fruits of the last cf *?D. U IIO. 
 years of apostolic influence when that influence had 
 its centre at Ephesus. Yet it is impossible to con- 
 ceive a teaching about the Church as a visible society 
 more intense, more passionate, than that of Ignatius. 
 Christ's authority is perpetuated in visible societies 
 with a visible organization, and each of these societies, 
 each Church, with its bishop and priests and deacons, 
 is an embodiment of what is not local, but catholic. 1 
 ' Where the bishop appears, there let the people be, 
 as where is Christ Jesus, there is the catholic Church.' 
 ' He who is within the sanctuary is pure, he who is 
 outside is impure, that is to say, he who does anything 
 apart from bishop and presbytery and deacons is not 
 pure in his conscience.' ' If any one follows a 
 separatist he does not inherit the kingdom of God.' 2 
 
 The Church may be represented from different 
 points of view. It may be emphasized, as was said 
 above, as the home of a divine grace covenanted to its 
 members alone ; this is perhaps the thought specially 
 suggested by the scriptural metaphors of the body 
 of Christ and the branches of the Vine. It may be The Alex- 
 emphasized from the side of authority, the Church an 
 being the mistress of men to subdue and to rule them ; 
 and this is the thought specially dear to the Roman 
 genius. It may be emphasized also from the side of 
 the revelation of truth, the Church being the school 
 
 1 ad Stnyrn. 8. ' The bishop is fhe centre of each individual Church, as Jesus 
 Christ is the centre of the universal Church' (Lightfoot's note). For further quota- 
 tions and discussion see chap. vi. 
 
 * ad Trail. ^ : ad Philad. 3.
 
 22 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 of truth to train human characters under its discip- 
 line ; and no doubt to the Alexandrians it is from this 
 point of view that Christianity is mostly, though not 
 of course exclusively, 1 thought of and loved. Christ 
 is the Truth. It is on the Church's truth that the 
 minds of Athanasius and Didymus are mainly fixed ; 2 
 it is the divine philosophy superseding all the 
 fragmentary truth possible to the world apart from 
 Christ by including it in a completer, purer whole 
 that Clement and Origen love. But it is quite an 
 error to suppose that they were the less churchmen 
 on this account. We have in St. Augustin's Confes- 
 sions an account of an old Platonic philosopher, 
 Marius Victorinus, trying to induce a simple-hearted 
 bishop to consider him a Christian on account of 
 his convictions, without requiring him to come into 
 the Church. Did walls, he asked, make Christians ? 
 The question was one better left without a direct 
 answer. But at any rate the philosopher was given to 
 understand that he could only become a Christian 
 by being baptized into the Christian body. This 
 ' ecclesiastical temper ' was as much that of Clement 
 and Origen as of later Alexandrians. 
 
 clement c . Clement may indeed have had an idea of a ' Church 
 within a Church,' a Church of the men of knowledge 
 who get beyond mere faith ; but men of faith and 
 men of knowledge are at one in common church 
 membership, in common use of the sacraments, in 
 
 1 See, e.g., a fine passage in Origen (c. Ceh. vi. 48) where the Church is described 
 as an organism, ensouled by the indwelling Word UJTO TOV uiou TOV OeoC I^VXOUJU.VTJV 
 Ti) varav TOV Oeov KKAi)<rtac. 
 
 B This is very beautifully illustrated by Didymus' commentary on the Psalms. 
 The guidance and food of the soul is mainly the Church's truth, as expressed in her 
 exact dogmas, and his feeling towards this truth is repeatedly expressed with the 
 greatest genuineness and force. Later, in the fifth century, the theology of Cyril 
 has a quite different tone from the theology of I.eo. The first thought of the one is 
 truth and life, of the other government.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 23 
 
 common obedience to 'the Church's rule,' 'the 
 apostolic and ecclesiastical right rule of beliefs.' l 
 The faith is not a philosophy ; it is embodied in 
 the one visible Church, true, ancient, catholic, and 
 apostolic. This only, in contrast to all the late- 
 devised ' schools ' of heresy which cannot be called 
 Churches, is the home of the elect, the one true 
 virgin mother of human souls. 2 ' This being the case,' 
 he says, ' it is plain that these later-born heresies and 
 those yet subsequent to them are innovations, driven 
 along distorted lines, upon the most ancient and true 
 Church. It has also, I think, been made plain from 
 what has been said that the Church which is true and 
 really ancient is one, and into it the elect according 
 to God's purpose are gathered. . . . The One Church 
 is associated with the nature of the One God. In 
 substance, in conception, in origin, in excellence, we 
 say that the ancient and catholic Church is one only, 
 having nothing like or equal to herself.' 3 
 
 1 Men of understanding are described as oo-ot vw' avrov [XptoroG] 
 Tup ypacfeaip efrjyrjaiv (card TOP eicicAijo-iaoTiicbp icapopa fKS(\6fJ.fVOi Siatrcofovcru' 
 (Strom, vi. 15. 125); cf. ^ airooroAiKTj cai e(C(cAi)o-iaoriioj 6p00TO/ix TUP SoyfiaViop 
 (/'. vii. 16. 1*4). The heretic is a man who has 'kicked at the tradition of the 
 Church and leaped off to the opinions of human heresies ' (it. vii. 16. 95) ; he neither 
 enters the kingdom of heaven himself, nor allows those whom he deceives to arrive 
 at the truth. 
 
 - Cf. Strom, vii. 17. (quoted below) ; vii. 15. 92 ; Paed. \. 6. 42 (on the one virgin 
 mother). For further quotations see Rothe An/tinge pp. 384 f-, 593, 601, etc. ; and 
 Dr. Bigg's Bampton Lectures, The Christian Platonists of Alexandria, pp. 86, 
 153 n 2 . 98-100, etc. 
 
 3 Strom, vii. 17. 107 : 'Op OVTCUS CXOPTCUP o~vfi^>apes eic r>js TrpoyepeoTanjs ai 
 aATjfleoTanjs cKJcAr)o~i'as TOS ^i6Tayep<rTe'pos TavTas <cai TO? Ti TOVTWP viropt/Brjicvtas 
 TU> xpopu Ke<caivoTOfi^o~dat irapa\apa.\8ei<ras aipt trees, eic Tuip eip7)/te'pjp apa </>apcpop 
 oT/xai yeyeprjo"flai, /ii'av eTpai TT)P aAtjOTJ (titAr)O'iap TTJP ria OPTC ap\aiai', eis JJP ot 
 KOTa irp69riv Sixaioi iyKaraXeyovrai.- epos -yap o pros TO fleou leal epos TOV Kvpi'ov. 
 Sia TOVTO icai TO aicpus Tifiiop Kara TTJP (iopwo'ip eiraipeiTai fii'fiTjfia op apx^S n)S /i'?- 
 TTJ yovp TOV epos <^uo~ei onryitAr|pouTai eicitAtjo'ta 7) >tui, i)P els jroAAas (taTare/ipeip 
 Pia^oprai atpeVeis. KaTa Te oup vjroo-Tao-iP KaTa Te en-tpotap icaTa Te apxi)P Kara Te 
 *XQ V povnv e'poi <f>afiep TY\V ap\aiav Kal ea9oAiiei|p edcAr)o~iap. . . . aAAa KOI 
 i efoxi) Tijs e(CeAi)o-ias, (caflairep r; apxij Tijs o-vo-Tao-ews, *aTa rijp iiovaa earip irapra 
 TO aAAa vTrep^dAAowa Kai fiT)Sep exovo~a ofxotop f} io"0p eaim).
 
 24 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Origen. Just in the same way the truth, which Origen set 
 
 himself with such noble zeal to expound and to put 
 into relation to the whole of knowledge, was no 
 abstract truth to be thought out by the free action 
 of the individual mind ; it was a truth committed to 
 a society and, though the sanctified reason could 
 explain, elucidate, accommodate it, it could not trans- 
 gress or neglect ' the rule of faith ' without being self- 
 
 A.D. j28-a 3 i. condemned. 1 ' Let the preaching of the Church be 
 preserved,' he says at the beginning of the book 
 which most laid him open to accusations of heresy, 
 ' handed down through the order of succession from 
 the Apostles, and remaining up to the present time 
 in the Churches : that alone is to be believed as truth 
 which is in no disagreement with the ecclesiastical 
 and apostolical tradition.' 2 Origen's teaching upon 
 the Church is full and rich, and when he comments, 
 for instance, on the red cord which marked Rahab's 
 house for safety, he says with equal positiveness that 
 there is no salvation except through the blood of 
 Christ, and no salvation outside the Church. 3 Un- 
 doubtedly Clement and Origen alike endeavoured to 
 mitigate this doctrine of exclusive salvation within 
 
 1 See Bigg B. L. lecture v. init. 
 
 2 de Princip. prooem. 2 : ' Servetur vero ecclesiastica praedicatio per successionis 
 ordinem ab apostolis tradita et usque ad praesens in ecclesiis permanens ; ilia sola 
 credenda est veritas, quae in nullo et ecclesiastica et apostolica discordat traditione.' 
 
 3 in fesu Nave horn. iii. 5 : ' Sciebat etenim quia nulli esset salus nisi in sanguine 
 Christ!. ... Si quis ergo salvari vult veniat in hanc domum. . . . Ad hanc venial 
 domum in qua Christ! sanguis in signo redemptionis est. . . . Nemo ergo sibi per- 
 suadeat, nemo semet ipsum decipiat : extra hanc domum, id est extra ecclesiam, 
 nemo salvatur.' in Matt. xii. n : TJTS e/ocArjcria, <o? XpioroC oiKo8o/u>j, TOV oiKoSo- 
 H'i<7aiTO? eavTOv TJ)I> aiiciac <>poi'tfib>? eTrl Trfv Tre'rpav, ayeTriSe/CTo? etrri irv\iav <jSov, 
 K<ni<r\vov<r!av fiev TTOVTOS of flpoiirov TOV efio TTJS TreVpas cai TTJS eKKArjfftas, ovSev fie 
 Svvafitvuv irpo? ovnjv. Cf. his interpretation of St. John i. 29 : ' He taketh away 
 the sin of the world,' i.e. ' the world of the Church, 1 the world within the world the 
 true (coo-pot (in foann. vi. ad fin.). It should be added that Origen, like Augustin, 
 recognised that the Church had in some sense begun to exist from the beginning, cf. 
 
 in Cant. i. n, 12 : 'prima etenim fundamenta congregationis ecclesiae statim ab 
 initio sunt posit a.'
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 25 
 
 the Church, so as to bring it into harmony with God's 
 universal purposes, with His recognised equity and 
 good-will towards all, and with the universal presence 
 of the Word to all men. 1 But with all this it is an 
 undoubted truth that they did, like all the other 
 Fathers, regard God's covenant in Christ as made 
 with a visible society, membership in which was of 
 universal 'obligation and alienation from which was 
 death. 
 
 Nor can it be maintained that the more philosophic The 
 
 . gists 
 
 apologists of the second century were inclined 'to 
 transform the Gospel into a monotheistic moral 
 system.' It has been said that in the recently 
 recovered Apology of the philosopher Aristides Aristi 
 presented to the Emperor Hadrian about A.D. 125, 
 or perhaps to the Emperor Antoninus Pius about 
 140 ' Christianity is exhibited as the most absolutely 
 certain philosophy.' 2 But an important considera- 
 
 1 E.g. (i) By generous recognition of the preparatory discipline of God leading up 
 to the Incarnation all over the world : see above, p. 16. 
 
 (2) By drawing a distinction between different points of Christian belief; oi eis rot 
 Kvpuarara. jrapajri'jrTovTfs are distinguished from oi irepl rtov ev M- P" <T<f>oAAo/uievoi. 
 Only the former are i/<eu<rrai TO> OVTI (Clem. Strom, vi. 15, 124). Cf. Origen c. 
 Cels. v. 63. 
 
 (3) By distinguishing grades of salvation, and excluding virtuous disbelievers in 
 Christ only from the highest eternal life. Origen in Rom. ii. 7 : ' Iste licet alienus 
 a vita videatur aeterna, quia non credit Christo, et intrare non possit in regnum 
 caelorum, quia renatus non est ex aqua et Spiritu, videtur tamen quod per haec, quae 
 dicuntur ab apostolo, bonorum operum gloriam et honorem et pacem perdere penitus 
 non possit. . . . Sed tamen in arbitrio legentis sit, probare quae dicta sunt.' 
 
 2 Harnack, Contemp. Review (Aug. 1886), p. 229. The fragments of two 
 Sermones S. Aristidis Philosophi had been edited from an early Armenian version, 
 with a Latin translation, by the Mechitarist Fathers. The first 'sermo' was the 
 opening of the apology previously known only by Eusebius' account of it. Since the 
 original issue of this book the apology has become known to us as a whole in Syriac 
 and, substantially, in Greek, see in Texts and Studies, vol. i. No. i (Cambridge, 
 1891). The Armenian and Syriac texts (pp. 32, 36) speak of four tribes or races of 
 men. The original Greek perhaps read three : see pp. 90, 100. The earlier Preach- 
 ing of Peter described the Christians as a 'third race,' p. 88 : cf. Hadrian (if his 
 letter to Servian is genuine; see Lightfoot's Ignatius \. p. 464): 'hunc [nummum] 
 Christian!, hunc ludaei, hunc omnes venerantur et gentes.' Cf. Melito's expression 
 for the Christians TO r!av Beoartftuv ye'vos (ap. Euseb. H. E. iv. 26), and the same 
 word in the Ep. ad Diognet. i tcati/ov TOVTO yevos i) ejrinjo'tv/xa, also rroAirtio (c. 5),
 
 26 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 tion is here left out of account. Christians are 
 spoken of as constituting a new ' tribe ' or ' race ' of 
 men ; side by side with Greeks [and barbarians] and 
 Hebrews are Christians. The mere adherents of a 
 philosophic school could not be so described ; Chris- 
 tians can be (however liable the expression is to be 
 misunderstood), because Christianity is essentially 
 Justin a society, a body. To Justin Martyr Christians are 
 c . "iT^s. 'the genuine high-priestly race of God,' and the 
 account of the sacraments which he gives the emperor 
 in his Apology, shows us how completely he conceived 
 of Christianity as a society^ There is, again, no more 
 beautiful description of the Church than that given 
 by another apologist, Theophilus of Antioch, when 
 
 he compares the ' holy Churches ' to fertile and well- 
 inhabited islands in the sea, which have fair harbours 
 of truth to welcome and give security to storm-tossed 
 souls. ' To these they flee for refuge who wish to 
 be saved, and who are lovers of the truth, wishing to 
 escape the wrath and judgment of God.' And there 
 are other islands, barren and dry and uninhabited 
 save of wild beasts, on whose harbourless coasts ships 
 are only wrecked, and these ' are the schools of error, 
 that is of the heresies, which destroy those who 
 approach them.' 2 
 
 though the author is explaining that Christians remain members of their own different 
 races and are not a people apart. Cf. Justin's apx<.fpa.TiKOv TO a\ri6ii>*ov yeVos co-picc 
 TOU 9tov (Dial. 116) and pif <frXW (ea * f 11 ? <rvva.y<oyf[ ical /ti tx/cArjcrir; (it. 63). Also 
 Origen c. Celt. viii. 75 : ^fitlf v eKaorrj TrdAei aAAo <ru<rr)jiia jrarpi'Sos, KTitrBev \6y<a 
 eoi), c'lrtcrra/iti'oi. It becomes an expression of popular hatred against Christians 
 that they are a genus tertium. See Tertull. Scorp. 10 : 'genus tertium depu- 
 tamur.' ad Nat. i. 8 : ' Roman!, ludaei, dehinc Christiani: ubi autem Graeci?' 
 
 1 Apol. i. 65. 
 
 2 Theophilus ad Autolycum ii. 14. In order to carry back the evidence of the 
 
 **J IMTMBMMBMUg * VJ31UIC DUClCLy j^U V Cl 11CU Lty il CU1I1I11UII 1 il U . J. IlC VlblUIC 
 
 society, the Church, knit together by social sacraments (though these sacraments are
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 27 
 
 Such being the Christian conception of their own The heathen 
 
 idea of the 
 
 body, it was inevitable that the world outside also Christians, 
 should have regarded them as members of a society 
 or brotherhood. As a matter of fact it was in this 
 way that they became an object of suspicion. They 
 seemed a sort of secret society, with an unintelligible 
 1 freemasonry ' of their own. Men suspected them of 
 all sorts of secret iniquities. And all this was due to 
 the closeness of their corporate life ; they seemed a 
 ' people of profane conspiracy,' ' a secret race, avoid- 
 ing the light, silent in public, chattering in corners,' 
 who ' recognised one another by secret marks and 
 signs, and loved almost before they knew one 
 another,' l calling one another by the suspicious name 
 of ' brother.' 2 So, like any other guild or sodality, 
 they appeared before the eyes of men as a body 
 whose privileges were conditional on membership. 
 Exact terms of membership were a special feature of 
 contemporary guilds. Their members constituted 
 a sort of republic apart. 3 Thus, though Christians 
 might make public explanation of their rites and 
 doctrines to avoid the misconceptions of the outside 
 world, yet these rites and doctrines were admittedly 
 the private property of their society, and no one 
 could have the Christian's God for his father who 
 had not the Christian's Church for his mother. 
 
 (2) But it has been suggested that Christianity (2) The social 
 owed its existence as a visible society to the fact that Christianity 
 
 not due to 
 secular in- 
 conceived of !n a Judaic, meagre spirit), is the home of the revelation of knowledge Co'i" ^ 
 and immortality given in Christ, and the antechamber to the final kingdom. Cf. x. 
 5 : ' Remember Thy Church to deliver her from all evil, and perfect her in Thy love, 
 and gather her from the four winds, the sanctified Church, into Thy kingdom which 
 thou didst prepare for her." Cf. ix. 4^ 
 
 1 This vivid picture is given in the Octavius of Minucius Felix, cc. 8, g. 
 
 2 ' Sic nos, quod invidetis, fratres vocamus' (Octav. 31). 
 
 3 See esp. Boissier (as quoted on p. 28) p. 261.
 
 28 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 in the age when it spread there was a special tendency 
 to association ' in the air/ Undoubtedly it was an 
 age of guilds. 1 'The need of association, of the 
 strength which comes of association was, at any rate, 
 as great in antiquity as to-day ; and among the 
 peoples of antiquity it is the Romans, perhaps, who 
 had the keenest sense of the need.' 2 The religious 
 associations and trade guilds (sodalitates, collegia) 
 were indeed ancient institutions at Rome. But the 
 principle of association had received a great develop- 
 ment, beginning with the later years of the Republic 
 and under the early Empire. Thus every trade, 
 every interest, came to have its collegium with its 
 organization more or less elaborate, its officers, its 
 specified terms of membership, its periodical feast. 
 ' But it was not necessary, in order to form an 
 association, to be members of the same profession, 
 to be neighbours even, or compatriots ; it was enough 
 to experience isolation or weakness, to feel the need 
 of union to fight against misery or "ennui." This 
 need was not rare, especially among the working 
 classes.' 3 The tendency to use this freedom of 
 association for purposes of political faction led to 
 its being put under restraint. No association might, 
 under the empire, be formed without permission. 4 
 But notwithstanding such prohibition, associations 
 were formed and spread. ' They filled Rome, they 
 spread in the little towns, they penetrated into the 
 country, they covered the richest provinces,' they 
 honeycombed all ranks of society. 5 They existed 
 
 1 See an admirable account Boissier La Religion Romaine bk. ii. ch. 3: 
 Mommsen de Collegiis et Sodaliciis Romanorum : Hatch B. L. p. a6 f. Ramsay 
 Ch. and Roman E>np. See index s.v. 'collegia.' My quotations are from Boissier. 
 
 2 Boissier ii. p. 248. 
 
 3 Boissier ii. p. 260. 4 Hatch, B. L. p. 27 n. 2 Ramsay, I.e. pp. 215, 359. 
 6 Boissier ii. p. 250. But the spread was unequal.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 29 
 
 where the authority to repress should have been 
 strongest even in the army. Contemporaneously 
 with the early spread of Christianity they developed 
 largely as benefit clubs, especially for the purpose 
 of burial in part, because association in this form 
 was allowed. 1 These burial guilds, in common with 
 perhaps all collegia, had a religious basis more or 
 less nominal, though the real purpose of association 
 was of another sort. 2 With some of the associations 
 the religious object, the promotion of some special 
 cult, was the primary and real bond of union. This 
 had been the case with the Greek guilds. 3 They 
 came into existence (from the sixth century B.C. 
 onward) partly under Semitic influence, to cultivate 
 some special worship on a basis of voluntary initiation 
 and by the primitive ' sacramental ' method. In their 
 developed form they had their terms of membership, 
 their sacred book and ' immutable law,' their priests 
 and officers, generally elected annually, and their 
 assembly to pass decrees each one a microcosm 
 of the organization of a democratic state. These 
 Greek guilds had been less influential, less respect- 
 able, and less prevalent than the Roman. However, 
 they lasted on, and formed an element in that 
 tendency to associate which (since the inscriptions 
 have come to be studied) we know to have been 
 a main characteristic of the otherwise somewhat 
 monotonous life of the early empire. 
 
 Such was the character of the period in which 
 
 1 This we know to have been the case in the first century. See Boissier ii. p. 280. 
 The inscription from Lanuvium, which is the main evidence of this, is given at the 
 end of Mommsen's de Collegiis. There were different classes of burial guilds, some 
 not having the name collegium, but societas (Boissier ii. p. 272). 
 
 2 Boissier ii. p. 268. Collegia tenuiorum,funeraticia. 
 
 3 0ia0-ot, fpavoi., opyeoH/ef. See Foucart's Lcs Associations Religievses chez Us 
 Greet, and F. B. Jevons' Introd. to Hist. <j/~./?e//7<7rt(Methuen, 1896), pp. 334 ff, 371.
 
 3O Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Christianity spread. No doubt the Christian Church 
 had obvious points of contact with these ' collegia.' 
 It appears in the correspondence of Pliny and Trajan 
 that the Christians of Bithynia came under the law 
 against associations in virtue of their Sunday evening 
 meetings for the social meal, which were consequently 
 abandoned. 1 So far as associations were legal, on 
 the other hand, Christians availed themselves of the 
 law : ' the first form, in which any Christian body 
 was recognised by the law, was as a benefit-club with 
 special view to the interment of the dead.' 2 No 
 doubt, again, the familiarity of the Greek and Roman 
 world with incorporation into voluntary societies, 
 with terms of membership, its privileges and the loss 
 of them, greatly facilitated the spread of the Christian 
 Church. It was thus an element in what we recog- 
 nise as the ' divine preparation ' for the spread of the 
 Gospel ; just as the Roman empire itself was another, 
 and the general use of the Greek language, and the 
 diffusion of the religion of the Jews through their 
 dispersion, and the recognition in contemporary 
 philosophy of the idea of the divine Reason or 
 Word. But if the question be asked whether the 
 influence of these contemporary guilds may not 
 have modified the Christian religion in such a 
 way as to be the cause of its assuming the form 
 of an association or system of associations the 
 
 Plmii Epp. x. 96, cf. Ramsay, p. 219. Their morning meeting was purely 
 religious, and consequently legal. ' The Roman Government expressly allowed to 
 all people the right of meeting for purely religious purposes.' 
 
 2 Lightfoot's Ignatius i. pp. 17-21. Ramsay thinks that in Phrygia the Christian 
 Churches coficealed themselves under the guise of collegia. See Authority and 
 Archeology pp. 380 ff. The Jewish communities were also classed with the 0iW<x ; 
 cf. Josephus, Ant. tud. xiv. 10 : Taios K<u<rap, 6 ^e'repoy OTpaT! Y bs al viraros, 
 > r<f fitaray/iari KcoAiW 0ca<rous <rvva.yf<r6a.t Kara. rrdAiv, JUOPOV? TOUTOVS OVK 
 <rwci<r<t>tptiv OUT* (rvvSewa. iroieii/.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 31 
 
 Church and the Churches the answer is a decisive 
 negative. 1 
 
 For, in the first place, any conception of real (<*) NO trace 
 affinity between the Church and the collegia was, fluence in 
 as the quotations above will have shown sufficiently, writers, 
 quite foreign to the minds of the Christian writers. 
 Tertullian indeed suggests a contrast between them 
 based on the fact that Christians, and they alone, 
 mutually supported one another and had all things 
 common ; but there was no consciousness of resem- 
 blance. 2 Nothing in fact was less characteristic of 
 the Christian Church than those natural features of 
 all association which it shared with the guilds, 
 nothing less expressed the sentiments of its members 
 towards their ' mother.' ' The resemblances ' between 
 the Church and the collegia, says M. Boissier, ' are 
 striking at the first glance ; as soon as one approaches, 
 the differences are apparent.' 3 
 
 Secondly, the nomenclature of the Christian (*) Christian 
 
 . . ,, . . r forms 
 
 communities suggests the minimum of connec- derived from 
 
 Judaism. 
 
 1 In some later developments Christianity may have borrowed in detail from con- 
 temporary clubs, e.g. the subdivision of monastic bodies into decuriae and 
 centuriae probably (see Boissier ii. p. 264 with reference to Jerome's letter) ; again, 
 some customs with reference to the dead and the use of the term memoria in this 
 connection (cf. fxc/iopioi/, fie/nopirrjO, Boissier ii. p. 290. The term trvvoSos was 
 used for the meetings of guildsmen : cf. (re/xpoTaTTj awoSos, Foucart p. 202, sancta 
 sy nodus (of an actors' guild with immoral reputation) Boissier ii. p. 267 f. But so 
 obvious a term can hardly be said to have been borrowed to express the meetings of 
 bishops. Also icA7j<ria, but (see next page, note !) not in the Christian sense. 
 
 2 The collegia were only very subordinately or slightly charitable associations 
 (see Boissier L pp. 302, 303) ; the Greek epacoi perhaps even less. ' Les Eranes, 
 says Foucart (p. 145), ' n'etaient pas des societes de secours mutuels.' See, however, 
 Jevons I.e. p. 226. The stipes menstruae were contributions to benefit-clubs, 
 not monthly alms ; see Tertull. Apol. 39. The point of closest connection between 
 the Church and the guilds lay in the common meal ; the ' love-feast ' of the Christians 
 had shown very early its affinities to the guild suppers (i Cor. xi. 17 f.). But St. 
 Paul meets this danger by marking the essential difference in origin and aim of the 
 ' Lord's Supper." Historically, it was a development of the Paschal supper (St. 
 Matt. xxvi. 7). 
 
 3 Boissier ii. p. 302. See also Loening, Die Gemeindeverfasrung des Urchristen- 
 thums (Halle, 1889) pp. 9 ff., and Hort Christian Ecclesia, pp. 128-9.
 
 32 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 tion. 1 For in fact the Christian Church had its roots 
 deep in Jewish soil. It derived from Judaism its 
 characteristic nomenclature that is to say, from a 
 source much more ancient than the Roman empire 
 or Greek society. The origin of the social form of 
 Christianity is to be sought in the Jewish conception 
 of the Messianic kingdom and in the deliberate inten- 
 tion of Him, who founded the Church, in claiming 
 to be the Messiah. 
 
 ( 3 ) witness (3) Does, then, the New Testament bear out the 
 
 Christ ' a position that Christ appeared as the founder and 
 
 v"ibi e e organizer of a visible society ? This question shall 
 
 be answered from the evidence of (a) the Gospels, 
 
 08) the Acts, (7) St. Paul's Epistles. 
 
 lf ) the V ' dence ( a ) ^e q 1165 ^ 011 mav be approached with less 
 
 Gospels. alarm because there is a remarkable unanimity 
 
 among men of the keenest historical insight in seeing 
 
 1 In the collegia and sodalicia we should hear of the album, or roll of members : 
 the magistri : the quinquennales : the patroni : the gradus : the schola : 
 thecena: theedituus: the quaestores. In the Greek epacoi or 0tWoi we should 
 have the rpo<rrar>)s, the apxoxres, the ejn/ieAjjTrjs, the fa/copoi, the iepoirotoi, the 
 ypafi/xaTcvt, the opxiepafitrnjs, the Tafias, the relieves. What an alien atmosphere 
 to this is suggested by the Christian nomenclature ! It is the pagan Lucian who speaks 
 of Peregrinus as 0ia<rapxi of the Christians. 
 
 The characteristic Christian terms are derived from Jewish use ; e.g. KitA.i)<rt'a has, 
 primarily at least, the sense of the holy people as such, the Church, rather than the 
 classical sense of the assembly, i.e. the people gathered together for a special 
 purpose; and the former sense is based on Old Testament use. Dr. Hort (The 
 Christian Ecclesia, pp. 3 ff.) gives an account of the original meanings of the two 
 
 Hebrew words /Hp and HIV and their LXX renderings eAcAi]<rta and (n/fayoiyrj 
 
 T T T" 
 
 somewhat different from that which Trench (N. T. Synonyms p. 4) adopted from 
 Vitringa. But at least after the Captivity the Hebrew 7Hp and the Greek eiocAijo-ta 
 
 had come to mean Israel or the sacred people (cf. Acts vii. 38), and it was in this 
 sense that the word was adopted by our Lord. See Hort I.e. pp. IO-IT. Mvcrnjpioi' 
 again has (at first) the Old Testament meaning of a divine secret communicated, 
 rather than the pagan sense of a mystery of initiation. See Hatch Biblical Greek 
 (Oxford, 1889) pp. 57-61. So /SoirTKTfios, evxapioria, Tparretja Kvpt'ov, iiriOftrif 
 Xfipiav, cfo/ioA6yT)(ris, xplvfjia, aSf\<f>oi, KaBeSpa, Trpecr/SvTepos, Troifuji', 5rpo</jTij9, 
 iayyAi<rnjs, etc., are all terms of Jewish colouring. So perhaps is e-i'<r/c07ros (see 
 App. Note K). The prominent Christian functions and titles, except such as were 
 substantially new, descend from the Jewish stock, with the whole religious basis of 
 Christianity.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 33 
 
 in Jesus one who above all things came to found a 
 society, a kingdom. 'To deny/ says the author of 
 Ecce Homo, ' that Christ did undertake to found and 
 to legislate for a new theocratic society, and that he 
 did claim the office of judge of mankind, is indeed 
 possible, but only to those who altogether deny the 
 credibility of the extant biographies of Christ. If 
 those biographies be admitted to be generally trust- 
 worthy, then Christ undertook to be what we have 
 described ; if not, then of course this, but also every 
 other, account of him falls to the ground.' 'The 
 city of God, of which the Stoics doubtfully and 
 feebly spoke, was now set up before the eyes of man. 
 It was no unsubstantial city such as we fancy in the 
 clouds, no invisible pattern such as Plato thought 
 might be laid up in heaven, but a visible corporation 
 whose members met together to eat bread and drink 
 wine, and into which they were initiated by bodily 
 immersion in water.' 1 There are three lines of 
 evidence which seem to make the truth of this posi- 
 tion clear : 
 
 First, there is the method of Christ. Nothing is (i> The - 
 more remarkable than the refusal of Christ to Christ : 
 commit Himself to men as He found them. There 
 is something at first sight repellent in the solemn 
 words of St. John : ' Jesus did not commit Himself 
 to those who first believed in His name, when they 
 
 1 Ecce Homo [:8th ed.] pp. 39, 128. On this subject of Christ's institution of a 
 visible Church, I should like to refer (among more recent writers) to Dean Church's 
 Advent Sermons ii and iii, and his Oxford House Paper, No. xvii ; Mr. Stanton's 
 Jewish and Christian Messiah ; Dr. Westcott's Essay on ' The Two Empires ' in 
 his Epp. of St. John ; Mr. Holland's Creed and Character ; and Dr. Milligan's 
 Resurrection of our Lord lecture vi. See also Archbishop Whately Kingdom of 
 Christ Essay it. init. and F. D. Maurice Kingdom of Christ \. p. 285 f. These 
 names represent (so far) a remarkable 'consensus. Among older English writers no 
 one contends more powerfully for the church idea than William Law in his Letters 
 to the Bisliop of Bangor. 
 
 c
 
 34 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 saw the miracles, because He knew all men, and 
 needed not that any should testify of man, for He 
 knew what was in man.' l That sad secret of human 
 nature its lamentable untrustworthiness the secret 
 which in slow, embittering experience has often 
 turned enthusiasts into cynics and made philan- 
 thropists mad Jesus knew it to start with. And, 
 knowing it, He would not build His spiritual edifice 
 on the shifting sands of such a humanity. It was not 
 that He distrusted the capacity of human nature for 
 the highest life. On the contrary, He came to pro- 
 claim the brotherhood of all men under the realized 
 fatherhood of God but not the brotherhood of men 
 as they were. Except ye be converted, He said, ye 
 shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Except 
 a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of 
 God. 2 Man must have a fresh start : he must be 
 built upon a fresh foundation : he must be re- 
 generated, converted, if he is to be fit for sonship 
 and for brotherhood. So Jesus Christ set Himself 
 to give humanity a fresh start from a new centre, 
 and that centre Himself. To do this He withdraws 
 from the many upon the few. To the multitude 
 He speaks in parables, 'that seeing they may not 
 see, and hearing they may not understand.' Only 
 a few, whom He sees capable of earnest self-sacrifice, 
 of perseverance, of enlightenment, are gradually 
 initiated into His secrets. These are ' the disciples.' 
 These He trains with slow and patient care to 
 appreciate His Person. From the most ready of 
 these He elicits, after a time, by solemn questioning 
 a formal confession of His Messiahship a formal 
 confession that He, the Son of Man, is also the 
 
 1 St. John ii. 23-25. 2 gt. j o i, n ,. 3 f ; gt. Matt, xviii. 3.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 35 
 
 Christ, the Son of the living God. 1 This thorough 
 recognition of His claim gives Him something to 
 depend upon. He has got down to the rock ; He 
 can begin to build. 2 ' Blessed art thou, Simon Bar- 
 Jona ; and I say unto thee that thou art Rock-Man, 
 and on this rock (the rock of this human person 
 acknowledging My divine Sonship and mission) I 
 will build my new Israel.' 3 This gives us the clue 
 to His method. All along Christ had had in view 
 this foundation of the Church, and we see now what 
 He had been waiting for. It was till He had won 
 out of the hearts of His disciples that absolute 
 devotion to His own Person, that complete acknow- 
 ledgment of His claim, which would enable them to 
 look away from all else and become the stable 
 nucleus of a new society which was to represent 
 His Name. Indeed, the more we study the Gospels, 
 the more clearly we shall recognise that Christ did 
 not cast His Gospel loose upon the world the world 
 which was so incapable of appreciating it ; that 
 would have been indeed to cast His pearls before 
 swine ; but He directed all His efforts to making a 
 home for it, and that by organizing a band of men 
 called ' out of the world,' and consecrated into a holy 
 unity, who were destined to draw others in time 
 after them out of all ages and nations. 4 On this 
 ' little flock ' He fixed all His hopes. He prayed 
 
 1 St. Matt. xvi. 16. 
 
 '- Holland Creed and Character pp. 46-49. All the idea of this paragraph is 
 admirably expressed in the sermon ' The Rock of the Church.' ' Pity, infinite pity, 
 He gave [the crowds] but Himself He never gave ; He could not commit Himself 
 unto them. His work, His mission, His purpose on earth how could they receive 
 it? how could they understand it? ... How can He build [the new house of God] 
 on that loose and shifting rubble, on that blind movement of the crowd, so vague 
 and so undetermined ? ' 
 
 3 See Hort, I.e. p. n. 
 
 4 St. John xvii, and the whole of these last discourses.
 
 36 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 not for the world, but for those whom God had 
 given Him out of the world. These in wonderful 
 ways He meant to link to Himself in an indissoluble 
 unity, as the branches to the vine, that they might 
 live as an organized body in the world, yet distinct 
 from it alive with His life, sanctified through His 
 truth, enlightened by His Spirit. Christ then by 
 His whole method declared His intention to found 
 a Church, a visible society of men which should be 
 distinct from the world and independent of it, even 
 while it should present before the eyes of all men 
 the spectacle of what their common life might 
 become, 
 is insti- Secondly, the intention of Christ to found a social 
 
 tution of * ' 
 
 social sacra- organization is apparent in the solemn ceremonies 
 
 ments : . 
 
 which He instituted as tokens of discipleship as well 
 as channels of grace. The sacraments are social 
 ceremonies. Baptism had formed part of the 
 ceremony of initiating a proselyte into the Jewish 
 Church. As used by John the Baptist, it had been 
 used in distinct relation to the coming of the 
 Messianic kingdom. As adopted by Christ, it was 
 no doubt meant to admit into the kingdom which 
 had come, the Church of the new covenant. 1 And 
 whatever possible ambiguity attends the conception 
 of baptism in this respect, is removed by the other 
 
 1 Dr. Hatch calls this an ' unproved assumption ' (/?. L. pref. sec. ed. p. xii). 
 I should have thought that all possible doubt was set at rest by the parallel institu- 
 tion of the Eucharist. That at least is the sacrament of a society. But I cannot 
 understand Dr. Hatch expressing a doubt that baptism had the social significance. 
 It was never an individual purification amongst the Jews (see Edersheim's Life 
 and Times of Jesus the Messiah i. pp. 272-274) ; it was always in connection with 
 the covenant which was with a race. The baptism of a Jewish proselyte was his 
 incorporation with the race ' his new birth.' See Sabatier La Didacht p. 84 f. (an 
 excellent passage on the relation of Christian to Jewish Baptism) ; Taylor Teaching 
 of the Twelve Apostles p. 55 f. ; and Edersheim ii. app. xii (on the antiquity of the 
 practice). Cf. also i Cor. x. a.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 37 
 
 sacrament. The Eucharist is nothing if not social. 
 Its whole natural basis as a common meal implies 
 a community. Christ, then, in making baptism and 
 the Eucharist the sacraments of His kingdom, just 
 as in making love of the brethren the characteristic 
 of His disciples, emphasized His intention to attach 
 men to Himself not as individuals but as members 
 of a brotherhood. 
 
 Lastly, and perhaps most conspicuously, the inten- <) His 
 
 />,,/ i -r-r. claim to be 
 
 tion of Christ to found a society is prominent in His the Messiah. 
 whole claim to be the Messiah. The Messianic king 
 of the Old Testament is the centre of a Messianic 
 kingdom ; the suffering Servant of Jehovah, by whose 
 stripes men are healed, is no mere individual, but 
 also the embodiment and representative of the 
 chosen race. 1 Christ, then, when He came as the 
 Messiah, brought the kingdom. ' The kingdom of 
 heaven is at hand ' that is John the Baptist's mes- 
 sage, that is the first word of Christ's preaching. 2 
 But in Him it was more than 'at hand.' It had 
 come upon men and was among them. 3 John the 
 Baptist had been outside it, but now there were those 
 who were inside it, and who, though they were but 
 little, were ' greater ' than John the Baptist on that 
 very account. 4 The kingdom had thus a definite 
 limit in time because it was to be a visible institu- 
 
 1 Stanton/tfTO/jA and Christian Messiah p. 122 f. 
 
 2 But only the first word, and then, too, with the addition given by St. Mark 
 ireTrArjpcorai 6 icaipos (Stanton I.e. p. 218). 
 
 3 St. Matt. xi. n, 12, xii. 28; St. Luke xi. 20, xvi. 16, xvii. 21. In spite of 
 Dalman, Worte Jesu p. 119, and Dr. F. Field Notes on Trans, of N. T. (Camb. 
 1899) p. 71, I think I>TOS VJU.MV can mean ' among' you. The kingdom of heaven, 
 our Lord tells the Pharisees, is not to be found by close watching (n-apanjprjo-is). 
 It will not be manifest to those who wait merely on external observation. (Lo, here ! 
 or Lo, there !) For it has already passed your frontiers (cp. xi. 20 tyOaaev e<f> 'v/aas) 
 and is among you ; see the two examples from Xenopbon in Grimm-Thayer's 
 Lexicon. Whether there are any similar examples in Greek more akin to St. Luke's 
 remains to be seen. * St. Matt. xi. n, 12.
 
 38 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 tion and not a mere invisible association of good 
 men. Christ had indeed to purify and elevate the 
 conceptions of His disciples so that they might 
 understand its spiritual nature and object ; but 
 though it was spiritual, though it was not adapted 
 to the carnal wants of the Jews, though it was not 
 ' of this world,' l yet it was to be in the world 'a 
 net to gather of every kind till the end of the world,' 
 a visible society, that is, in which evil and good 
 should be mixed. 2 Christ then came to establish a 
 ' kingdom of heaven ' or a ' kingdom of God.' What 
 does this expression mean ? It means an organized 
 society of men in which the old barrier which sin 
 had interposed between heaven and earth has been 
 done away, in which Jacob's ancient dream is a 
 dream no longer, for ' the angels of God ascend and 
 descend ' upon the new humanity, and God and man 
 are at one again. It is because Christ's new society 
 is thus heavenly that a divine sanction can attach to 
 its legislative and judicial decisions : thus what they 
 bind or loose on earth is to be bound or loosed in 
 heaven, and whose sins they forgive are to be for- 
 given, whose sins they retain to be retained. 3 Is 
 
 1 St. John xviii. 36. 
 
 2 St. Matt. xiii. 47. Cf. Stanton I.e. p. 220 f. Add Matt. xxii. 2 (the Marriage 
 of the King's Son). ' Let us suppose,' says William Law (Letter iii. pp. 173-4), 
 ' that the Church of Christ was this invisible number of people united to Christ by 
 such internal invisible graces, is it possible that a kingdom consisting of this one 
 particular sort of people invisibly good should be like a net that gathers of every 
 kind of fish? If it was to be compared to a net it ought to be compared to such 
 a net as gathers only of one kind, viz., good fish, and then it might represent 
 to us a Church that has but one sort of members. ... If any one should tell us 
 that we are to believe invisible scriptures and observe invisible sacraments, he 
 would have just as much reason and Scripture on his side as your Lordship has for 
 this doctrine. And it would be of the same service to the world to talk of these 
 invisibilities if the canon of Scripture was in dispute, as to describe this invisible 
 Church, when the case is with what visible Church we ought to unite.' 
 
 s St. Matt, xviii. 17-20; St. John xx. 22, 23. I am not raising the question yet 
 whether the gift in this latter passage is not given to the ministry. See later, 
 chap. iv.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 39 
 
 then Christ's new society, the Church, simply identi- (The relation 
 cal with the kingdom of God or of heaven ? To church to 
 
 , . .... .1 . the kingdom 
 
 answer this question a distinction must be drawn in of God.) 
 view of the double sense in which the kingdom is 
 said to come. In one sense the kingdom is already 
 come ; that is, it is established in spiritual power and 
 all its forces are at work. But, as St. Augustin has 
 expressed it, ' non adhuc regnat hoc regnum ' ; for it 
 has yet to grow like the mustard-seed, to work its 
 way like the leaven through all the institutions of 
 the world, it has yet to bear its universal witness ' to 
 all the nations ' ; only so at last can the kingdom 
 come in glory. Thus in one sense the kingdom 
 already exists, in another sense it has yet to appear. 1 
 In this latter sense, then, the Church prepares for the 
 kingdom rather than is it. 2 But in the first sense, 
 though the ' kingdom of God ' remains a less definite 
 and concrete term than ' the Church,' yet the Church 
 is so simply identified with the ' kingdom ' that St. 
 Peter, as the Church's future steward, has promised 
 to him ' the keys of the kingdom of heaven ' the 
 
 1 All this is expressed in the double use of all the characteristic Gospel terms, as 
 (T) of things already being enjoyed ; (2) of things hoped for. We are sons, yet 
 we ' wait for the adoption ' ; we are redeemed, yet we wait for ' the redemption of 
 our bodies ' ; we are saved, yet only in the future will ' our salvation draw nigh ' ; it 
 is now only ' nearer than when we believed.' Here in fact the kingdom is in 
 power not in glory or final fulfilment. But it is because the present Church is a 
 simple anticipation of the Church as it is to be the same society at an earlier stage 
 that even now it is called 'heavenly.' We have been 'made to sit in heavenly 
 places ' : we have ' tasted the powers of the world to come ' : the institutions of 
 the Church are ' the heavenly things ' : and we ' are come unto the heavenly Jeru- 
 salem ' (Eph. i. 3, 20 ; Heb. vi. 5, ix. 23, xii. 22). 
 
 2 Cf. Didache ix. 4 : ' Let Thy Church be gathered together from the ends of 
 the earth into Thy kingdom." Clem, ad Cor. 43 : oi iiro<rro\oi . . . i-!j\0oi> 
 evayyeAtfd/iei/ot TTJV fiacri\eia.v rov Oeov fie'AAti/ IpxecrOai. Cf. Church's Advent 
 Sermons p. 70 : The kingdom of God ' has its witness, its representative in the 
 universal Church of Christ. Nothing can be an adequate representation of that 
 invisible kingdom of God ; it extends, even on earth, beyond even the bounds of 
 the universal Church. But His Church is the designated and appointed recognition 
 of His kingdom.' Ib. p. 72 : The Church is ' the religious body which he has called 
 into being, to be the shadow and instrument of His kingdom.'
 
 4O Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 power, that is, by admitting to the Church and ex- 
 cluding from it, to admit men to or exclude them 
 from the kingdom of God. 
 
 Christ, then, according to the evidence of the 
 Gospels, founded a community of men, a Church, to 
 be the depository of the gospel which He came to 
 bring, to be the household in which His stewards 
 should dispense the food of God until He came 
 again ; l and in the great forty days, when He spoke 
 to His disciples of the things concerning the kingdom 
 of God, He spoke to them as the first representatives 
 of that visible society which was to be at least its 
 earthly counterpart. 
 
 (The church We must not suppose that the institution by Christ 
 site*)" 1 of a Church with a definite limit and an exclusive 
 claim is a narrowing of His love. 2 The claim which 
 the Church makes on every man simply corresponds 
 to his moral needs as Christ interprets them. It is 
 because He loves all that He established a Civitas 
 Dei, wide enough for all, in order to their spiritual 
 recovery. The Church would indeed represent a 
 narrowing of the divine love if any were by Christ's 
 will excluded from it. But it is open to all. And 
 as there are those to whom 'the gospel of the 
 kingdom ' has never come, or never come with its 
 true appeal, so we are assured that God's purpose is 
 larger than His Church on earth. 3 There are ' last ' 
 
 1 St. Luke xii. 41, 42. 
 
 2 See Holland Creed and Character serm. iv. 'The Secret of the Church,' esp. 
 pp. 59, 60. "God's love in Christ found itself limited. . . . How? Not by the 
 Church, but by the crowd, by the block of blind and heedless ignorance.' 
 
 a See esp. St. Matt. xxv. 31 f. Cf. Dr. Pusey's Responsibility of Intellect in 
 Matters of Faith p. 44 [ed. 1879] : ' In those ever open portals there enter that 
 countless multitude whom the Church knew not how to win ... or, alas 1 neglected 
 to win them. ... In whatever hatred, or contempt, or blasphemy of Christ 
 nurtured, God has His own elect, who ignorantly worship Him, whose ignorant fear 
 or longing He Who inspired it will accept.'
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 41 
 
 in the knowledge of God here and now who shall be 
 ' first ' in His final acceptance, because they practised 
 all they knew. 
 
 (/3) When Christ speaks to St. Peter of the (ft) Evidence 
 
 p ^ \ of the Acts. 
 
 foundation of the Church, it is still in the future. 
 The Church only receives its commission to all 
 nations after His Resurrection. It comes into actual 
 corporate life only with the Pentecostal gift. Thus, 
 in the Acts of the Apostles, the Church goes forth 
 for the first time a visible community, vitalized by 
 Christ's Spirit, to be the representative on earth of 
 the risen and ascended Lord. 1 
 
 That Christianity in the Acts is represented by 
 a community, there can surely be no doubt. The 
 souls ' who were added ' at Jerusalem ' continued 
 steadfast in the Apostles' teaching and fellowship.' 
 They were members of a society more or less 
 organized. They had all things common. Salvation 
 was in the community ; ' the Lord added ' to them 
 'day by day those who were being saved.' 2 As the 
 new religion spread over Galilee and Samaria it was 
 still 'the Church.' 3 'The Church at Antioch,' 
 
 1 ' To [the Church] alone,' says Prof. M.i\\\gzn(Resitrrection ofovr Lord, second 
 thousand, p. 218), ' as the representative of the Risen Lord, is the power entrusted 
 by which [His] work may be successfully accomplished. We know that this can be 
 done by no other means than the agency of the Spirit ; and it would seem that 
 the gift of the Spirit is bestowed only through the Church as the organ upon earth 
 of the Risen and Glorified Lord in heaven. We dare not indeed restrain the 
 power of the Almighty ; but what we have to do with is His//an ; and of that plan 
 what has now been said appears to be one of the most striking characteristics. 
 ... It appears to be the teaching of the New Testament that, as it is the pre- 
 rogative of Christ in His glorified humanity to bestow the Spirit, so it is only 
 through the Church, as the representative of that glorified humanity, that the in- 
 fluences of the Spirit are communicated to the world.' He emphasizes earlier the 
 visible unity which the Church was meant to have as the representative of the 
 Risen Christ (p. 204). 
 
 2 Acts ii. 41-47. 
 
 3 Acts ix. 31: 'The Church through the whole of Judaea and Galilee and 
 Samaria had peace.' The baptism of the eunuch is an act of an exceptional 
 character.
 
 42 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 where Christians got their new name, 1 is the same 
 society extending itself to a new city. So when 
 St. Paul went abroad, he founded ' Churches ' to 
 prepare men for the kingdom. 2 And the local 
 Churches are but branches of one stock. Behind 
 the Churches is the Church represented by the 
 Apostles. This is the truth which is impressed on 
 the narrative of the Apostolic Conference with its 
 authoritative direction to the Churches ' It seemed 
 good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you 
 no greater burden than these necessary things.' 3 
 This is only the exhibition in act of the authority 
 given by Jesus Christ to His society over its 
 members, to bind and to loose with heavenly 
 sanction. 
 
 ( y ) Evidence (7) The picture presented in the Acts is the same 
 Epistles 3 " s as that of which we become spectators in St. Paul's 
 Epistles. He writes to ' the Church of God which 
 is at Corinth,' and that Church is undoubtedly a 
 visible body containing good and bad members 
 alike. It is a ' temple of God,' but a temple which 
 sin can corrupt ; 4 a chosen people, but one like 
 that of the old covenant, capable of like failure ; 5 
 it is the ' body of Christ ' through sacramental parti- 
 cipation in His life, but there may be ' schism in the 
 body.' 6 St. Paul then conceives of the local Church 
 as a visible community of mixed character, but with 
 unmistakeable limits. The distinction between 
 
 1 Acts xiii. i ; xi. 26. On the significance of the exact form Christian! see 
 Simcox's Early Church History p. 62 : on the analogy ofHerodiani, Pompeiani, 
 etc., it suggests, not the disciples of a school, but the adherents of a leader or 
 king. 
 
 2 Acts xiv. 22, 23 ; xv. 41 ; xvi. 5. 3 Acts xv. 28. 
 4 i Cor. iii. 17. s T COT. x. 1-13. 
 
 6 i Cor. x. 16; xii. 12-28. It is of course plain why the imperfections of the 
 Church are dwelt on in connection with the local societies : they are naturally 
 matters of specially local concern and local treatment.
 
 I.] The Foundation of tlie Church. 43 
 
 ' those within ' and ' those without ' is very marked. 1 
 But each local Church is only one representative of 
 the Church which is general. St. Paul governs each 
 particular Church in accordance with the evangelical 
 tradition of truth and life, which is common to all 
 and to which he is himself subject. 2 He passes back 
 imperceptibly, without any break in thought, from 
 the Churches to the Church ; 3 the Church in fact 
 simply (as far as this world is concerned) consists of 
 the Churches. Thus, when in the Epistle to the 
 Ephesians he is drawing out the spiritual significance 
 of the Church as ' the body of Christ, the fulness of 
 Him who filleth all in all ' when he is declaring it 
 to be one, in virtue alike of the one life which it 
 derives from Christ by the communication of the 
 Spirit, and of the one truth which 'apostles and 
 prophets ' delivered from Christ, and of the love in 
 which it must bind both Jews and Gentiles in one * 
 he is indeed describing the Christian society ' from 
 an ideal point of view ' ; that is to say, he is describ- 
 ing all that the Church potentially is, as when we 
 too proclaim the Church ' one, holy, and catholic.' 5 
 
 1 i Cor. v. 9-13 ; cf. xiv. 23 ; 2 Cor. vi. 14 f. Of course the brethren at a particular 
 place, as at Rome, when St. Paul wrote his Epistle to * the saints ' there, may not 
 yet have been completely organized into a local Church. That was, as it is now, a 
 work of time. But a Christian, as such, is a member of the Christian society, and, 
 unless in exceptional circumstances, of an organized local Church. 
 
 2 i Cor. xi. 2 'The traditions' ; i Cor. xv. 3; 2 Thess. iii. 6; i Cor. vii. 17 'So 
 ordain I in all the Churches'; Gal. i. 7, 8 'Though we, or an angel from heaven, 
 should preach unto you any other gospel ... let him be anathema.' 
 
 3 i Cor. xii. 28, xv. 9 ; Gal. i. 13. 
 
 4 Eph. iv. 3-16 : It is 'one body' in virtue of the 'one Spirit' whose indwelling is 
 Christ's indwelling ; owns ' one Lord ' in the power of 'one faith ' and the consecra- 
 tion of one baptism ; and it knows no God and Father but one. It ought to live, 
 therefore, in the unity of love (ver. 3), but the ' bond of peace ' is a duty which may 
 be neglected. The inward unity of life, though dependent on outward facts (e.g. 
 ' one baptism '), is a reality, whether recognised in practice or not. 
 
 6 The Church has never yet so developed all the fulness within her as to exhibit 
 herself in her full catholic glory and holiness as the ' bride of Christ.' She is 
 potentially more than she is actually. Potentially catholic, for example, she still 
 leaves outside her fold the mass of Orienta peoples.
 
 44 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Nevertheless it is the visible, actual Church of which 
 he is speaking, 1 the Church to which Christ gave 
 visible officers ' some apostles, some prophets, some 
 evangelists, some pastors and teachers,' for the full 
 equipment of the Church with a view to what it is 
 to do and what it is to become. This visible hier- 
 archy belongs plainly to a visible society exactly 
 that same society which St. Paul similarly describes 
 in his Epistle to the Corinthians as ' the body of 
 Christ,' even as part of Christ, 2 the Church in which 
 'God set first apostles, secondly prophets, thirdly 
 teachers,' 3 that is the general community which is 
 locally represented in the Churches of Corinth and 
 Ephesus. 4 St. Paul then means by the Church a 
 society as visible as the Churches which represent it. 
 church It is sometimes argued that St. Paul could not 
 
 ^consistent have believed in salvation through the Church, be- 
 c^tio n u by cause this contradicts his doctrine of the justifying 
 effect of individual faith. 6 But in fact there is no 
 
 1 See Pfleiderer's account of the Epistle to the Ephesians ( Paulinism. ii. pp. 190- 
 193) and Hort's Ecclesia p. 169 ; and my own Efhesians pp. 140 if. 
 
 2 'The Christ' consists of the head and the members (i Cor. xii. 12). 
 
 3 i Cor. xii. 37-28. This passage (vv. 12-28) about the body of Christ, taken with 
 such passages as Gal. iii. 27 ('baptized into Christ') and i Cor. x. 16, 17 (about the 
 Eucharist), seems to me to contain all the truth that is developed in the Epistle to 
 the Ephesians ; nor can I see that there is anything in the expression ' the Church, 
 the pillar and ground of the truth' (i Tim. iii. 15), which might not have occurred 
 in the Epistles to the Ephesians or to the Corinthians. 
 
 4 Dr. Hatch calls it an unproved assumption that ' the Church of which St. Paul 
 speaks as the body of Christ, " the fulness of Him which filleth all in all," is really, 
 as the Augustinian theory assumes it to be, a visible society, or aggregation of 
 societies ' (. L. pref. sec. ed. p. xii). His view appears to coincide with that of 
 Bishop Hoadly, who was Law's opponent. The Bishop held ' as the only true 
 account of the Church of Christ," in general, that it was ' the number of men, whether 
 small or great,' who were sincere Christians i.e. the invisible society of the elect. 
 This, he held, is what St. Paul calls the Church. ' It cannot be supposed,' he pleads, 
 ' that a man's being of the invisible Church of Christ is inconsistent with his joining 
 himself with any visible Church ' ; but the first is essential, the second is voluntary. 
 Law deals with trenchant power with this utterly unscriptural distinction between 
 the ' universal invisible ' and ' particular visible ' Churches (Letter iii. pp. 177 ff.) 
 
 5 Pfleiderer tfibbert Lectures lect. vi.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 45 
 
 such contradiction. The Christian life is a corre- 
 spondence between the grace communicated from 
 without and the inward faith which, justifying us 
 before God, opens out the avenues of communication 
 between man and God, and enables man to appro- 
 priate and to use the grace which he receives in 
 Christ. There is thus no antagonism, though there 
 is a distinction, between grace and faith. Now grace 
 comes to Christians through social sacraments, as 
 members of one ' spirit-bearing body.' ' By one 
 Spirit are we all baptized into one body ' ; ' we being 
 many are one bread and one body, for we are all 
 partakers of that one bread.' Thus the doctrine of 
 the Church as the household of grace is the comple- 
 ment, not the contradiction, of the doctrine of faith. 
 Faith is no faith if it isolates a man from the fellow- 
 ship of the one body, and the one body has no 
 salvation except for the sons of faith. Ignatius then 
 with his strenuous insistence on churchmanship can 
 rightly, so far, ' claim to be a good Paulinist.' * In 
 fact St. Paul's teaching about the Church is given 
 nowhere with more practical force than in the 
 Epistles to the Corinthians, which belong to that 
 very group of Epistles in which he fights the battle 
 of faith. And both principles are brought into play 
 by him to vindicate against Judaism the catholicity 
 of the Gospel. Christianity is a catholic religion, he 
 argues in his earlier Epistles, because it appeals to a 
 faculty as universal as human nature the faculty of 
 faith : men are justified by nothing of national or 
 local observance like the Law ; ' it is one God Who 
 will justify the circumcision by faith and the uncir- 
 cumcision through faith.' Christianity is catholic, he 
 
 1 Pfleiderer I.e. p. 262 ; Ignatius ad Phil. 8.
 
 46 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 argues again in effect, in the Epistles of the first 
 captivity, because the Person of Christ is a catholic, 
 a universal Personality; 'by Him were all things 
 created by Him and for Him and in Him all 
 things have their consistence.' Therefore also His 
 redemptive power transcends all local, national dis- 
 tinctions ; ' He hath made both (Jews and Gentiles) 
 one ... in one body.' For the unity of that body, in 
 which on the basis of faith the Gospel offers sanctifica- 
 tion to mankind, is by its very essence as the body of 
 Christ universal in its capacity. But these two grounds 
 of catholicity are correlative, not antagonistic, 
 nor with the Once again, if there be such a thing as liberty in 
 lhe e sjirh' c ? law or a ' law of liberty,' l the obligations of church 
 membership and the authority of a common rule of 
 truth are not in any way antagonistic to the freedom 
 of the spirit. The good citizen, whether of the earthly 
 or heavenly city, is free in the law by being at one 
 with the spirit of the law. Here again the same 
 St. Paul held to both sides of the antithesis which 
 is represented by authority and freedom, by fellow- 
 ship and individuality. 
 
 but agree- The doctrine of the Church is indeed only one 
 
 pr/ncipie h of expression of a principle as broad as human society 
 
 llocie'ty"*" tne principle that man realizes his true self only 
 
 by relation to a community, that ' he is what he is 
 
 only as a member of society.' Aristotle said of old 
 
 that ' the society (the city) is prior to the individual ' 
 
 prior, that is, in idea, because it is essential to his 
 
 being really man, because man is by his very essence 
 
 'a social animal.' 2 By isolating himself he hinders, 
 
 1 St. James i. 25. 
 
 2 On the Greek idea of the iroXi? see Newman Politics of Aristotle i. p. 560 : 'a 
 strongly individualized unity, which impresses its dominant ideas upon its members ; 
 etc.'
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 47 
 
 he narrows himself, he perishes : by merging himself 
 in the larger whole, he realizes his true individuality 
 and his true freedom. So when God sent redemption 
 upon the earth, He sent it in a community or king- 
 dom. Fellowship with God is to be won through 
 fellowship with His Son, but that not otherwise than 
 through fellowship with His Church. ' That ye may 
 have fellowship with us ' that is why St. John writes 
 his Epistle 1 'and truly our fellowship is with the 
 Father, and with His Son Jesus Christ.' Nor are we 
 to suppose that this association is only a temporary 
 and painful expedient that we are to submit to be 
 one body for a while in order to live a more separate 
 and isolated life hereafter. No, as the life of perfected 
 humanity 2 is presented to us in the vision of the 
 Apocalypse, it is the life of a city indissolubly one. 
 It is the life of the one bride of Christ, the one 
 humanity, whose white robes are the distinctive, yet 
 coincident, ' righteousnesses of the saints.' 3 
 
 Now that we have brought this investigation to a TWO miscon 
 conclusion, we are in a position to repudiate two the'g^wth 
 ways of conceiving the development of Christianity, church. 
 
 i. It has been represented * as if at the first stage i. That it 
 we must conceive of Christians rather as individual outof re- 
 believers who were led to unite in local associations, 
 This is accounted for by the ' tendency to associa- 
 tion,' characteristic of the Roman empire of that 
 date. But association was not at first a 'fixed 
 
 1 i St. John i. 3. ' Manifests ostendit B. lohannes quia quicunque societatem cum 
 Deo habere desiderant primo ecclesiae societati debent adunari ' (Bede, quoted by 
 Westcott in he.). 
 
 2 I am not wishing to deny that St. John is representing the Church as she now is 
 Cf. Milligan The Revelation of St. John p. 228. But it is certainly a picture of 
 what she will not only be, but be "wholly and manifestly, hereafter. 
 
 3 Rev. xix. 8. 
 
 4 By Dr. Hatch (B. L. p. 29 f.), if I can understand him rightly. Dr. Sanday 
 interprets him otherwise (Expositor, Jan. 1887, p. 10 n !).
 
 48 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 habit ' ; it was not ' universally recognised as a 
 primary duty ' ; it did not ' invariably follow belief.' 
 Afterwards the local associations succeed in so 
 asserting themselves over individual Christians that 
 adhesion to a community ceases to be voluntary ; a 
 man is no Christian unless he belongs to one. This 
 is the state of things which the Ignatian letters were 
 intended to promote. Still, however, Christians 
 might be supposed to unite in Churches how and 
 where they pleased. But later ' this free right of 
 association ' vanishes ; * each Church with its bishop 
 and presbytery asserts itself as the exclusive local 
 ' ark of the covenant.' All who would be within the 
 pale must belong to this one and none other. This 
 is the successful contention of Cyprian. Still later 
 these authoritative local Churches grow into closer 
 and closer combination. The idea of the Catholic 
 and Apostolic Faith, due to St. Irenaeus, 2 had already 
 formed a bond of union under a common authorita- 
 tive Creed. Now, the Churches become one great 
 confederation of societies in a unity which found 
 expression in ecumenical councils with their common 
 authority. 3 Gradually, meanwhile, the hierarchical 
 gradations amongst the various bishops develop on 
 the lines of the imperial system. 
 
 -a theory Now this mode of conceiving the progress of Chris- 
 tianity is in direct violation of the evidence. The 
 only evidence produced for the supposed first stage 
 which preceded obligatory association consists in 
 the fact that the earliest church teachers found it 
 necessary to preach the duty of association, ' if not 
 
 1 Hatch B. L. pp. 103-106. 
 
 3 Ib. p. 96 : ' Its first elaboration and setting forth was due to one man's genius.' 
 
 3 /* PP- 97, 175-189.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 49 
 
 as an article of the Christian faith, at least as an 
 element of Christian practice.' 1 This is evidenced 
 by the warning in the Epistle to the Hebrews 
 against forsaking the Christian assemblies ; 2 by St. 
 Jude's denunciation of those who ' separate them- 
 selves'; 3 by the passages in the Shepherd of 
 Hermas 4 about those who 'have separated them- 
 selves ' and so ' lose their own souls.' What do such 
 utterances really go to prove ? A separatist tendency 
 on the part of those who had been Christians^ a sin 
 of schism, denounced like any other sin. But the 
 idea is nowhere discernible that every Christian was 
 not, as such, a member of the Church, bound to the 
 obligations of membership. 6 Schism is a sin in 
 Scripture 7 as really as in Ignatius' letters. Next, 
 the supposed right of free association into Churches 
 never existed. No doubt the tendency to associa- 
 tion in the Roman empire made (as has been said) 
 for the spread of the Christian Church. It made the 
 idea of a Church easier to men's minds. But more 
 than this the facts of the case will not allow us to 
 grant. Christ Himself constituted the Church and 
 gave it its authority, so that it came upon men as a 
 divine gift, with a divine claim, through the apostolic 
 preaching. ( Jesus,' says Mr. Stanton, ' never speaks 
 of the kingdom as something which men could con- 
 stitute for themselves ; it must come to them.' 8 
 
 1 Hatch B. L. p. 29. 2 Hebrews x. 25. 
 
 3 St. Jude 19. 4 See above, pp. 18-19. 
 
 5 That they had been members of the Church is quite plain in the passages quoted 
 from Hermas. 
 
 8 Of course he might find himself in an isolated position away from church 
 privileges, as may happen to-day. 
 
 7 The 'heretic' is the man of self-willed, separatist tendencies (Tit. iii. 10). Cf. 
 St. Jude 19 ; St. Matt, xviii. 17. 
 
 * Jewish and Christian Messiah p. 218. 
 
 D
 
 50 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 From the beginning of Christianity it came to men 
 and took them up, one by one, out of their isolation 
 and alienation from God into its holy and blessed 
 fellowship. It was never a creation of their own by 
 free association. The idea is a figment. From the 
 first each local Church with its organization repre- 
 sented the divine will for man's salvation in one 
 body. Those who would share what Christ came to 
 give must be added to it. Once added to it, they 
 must remain in it, obedient children of the divine 
 mother, loyal citizens of the city of the saints. Thus 
 Cyprian's vigorous condemnation of schismatics who 
 broke off from the Church at Carthage or in Rome 
 involved no new principle at all, 1 nothing that was 
 not implied in Ignatius' cry ' one altar, one Eucharist, 
 one bishop ' 2 or in Clement of Rome's remonstrance 
 with the schismatical party at Corinth. Nor was the 
 Catholic Apostolic Faith an idea originated or sub- 
 stantially developed by Irenaeus, though he gave it 
 a new and powerful application. Irenaeus is anything 
 rather than a genius who originates. This idea of 
 the universal authoritative tradition of the Christian 
 faith, as it made possible in a later epoch the general 
 councils, as it inspired Clement in Alexandria quite 
 as much as Irenaeus in the West, so in earlier days 
 it made possible the ' Catholic Epistles,' 3 and was 
 present in the Church since men first rallied to the 
 apostolic doctrine. Whatever development there 
 was, then, from the day of Pentecost till the Council 
 of Chalcedon did not touch the truth of the visible 
 
 1 The Eastern Churches which were at first inclined to accept Novatian would 
 have accepted him as the bithop of Rome, not as one among a number. The question 
 was simply who was the bishop. See further in chap. in. 
 
 2 ad Phil. 4. 
 
 3 Harnack Texte . Untersuch. ii. band, heft 3. p. 105.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 5 1 
 
 Church or aggregation of Churches, which it always 
 presupposed, nor the corresponding obligation of 
 membership in it : it presupposed the doctrine of 
 the visible Church with its threefold unity in the 
 life which it derived from its Head, Christ, in the 
 truth of the apostolic tradition, and in the fellowship 
 and intercourse of love. 
 
 2. It remains to point out that this idea of the 2- That the 
 
 /~i 11 /-< i i- 1 Church idea 
 
 Church, known as Catholicism, was not the creation was a Roman 
 of western influences and cannot historically be m e e V nt p 
 identified (as is sometimes 1 done) with Romanism. 
 Was there, then, nothing new in that western concep- 
 tion of the Church which was finally expressed in the 
 mediaeval papacy ? Novelty there undoubtedly was, 
 but it was not in any sense the doctrine of the 
 visible Church. What then do the facts of history 
 allow us to describe as Catholicism and what as 
 Romanism ? 
 
 Church unity in the New Testament is expressed but there is 
 primarily in such metaphors as those of the body d^'Sne"^ 
 of Christ or the Vine with its branches. What churdi ble 
 primarily constitutes the unity of the Church is the 
 life of Christ derived to its members by His Spirit. 
 The Church is one on account of the spiritual presence 
 which makes her the temple of God or the ' Christ- 
 bearer.' None the less the Church is an external 
 reality, a visible society ; for the principle of the 
 Incarnation, which governs the Church, links the 
 
 1 See for this idea, in a curiously unhistorical shape, Allen's Continuity of 
 Christian Thought pp. 100-105. Cf. Harnack's Dogmengesch. i. pp. 362-371 
 (Katholisch u. Romisch) ; also Renan's Hibbert Lectures. The latter assumes in 
 support of his theory that St. Luke's writings (p. 132), the 'Preaching of Peter' 
 the basis of the Clementine Homilies' and Recognitions (p. 134) and probably the 
 Pastoral Epistles (p. 163) derive from the Roman Church and represent its ideas. 
 At least the Pastoral Epistles, like the Ignatian (p. 170), exhibit what is character- 
 istically the Roman temper !
 
 52 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 inward to the outward, the spiritual to the material 
 there is 'one body' as well as 'one Spirit/ 
 Spiritual gifts are given by sacraments, and sacra- 
 ments are visible and social ceremonies of incorpora- 
 tion, or benediction, or feeding. Thus the Christian's 
 spiritual privileges depend on membership of a visible 
 society ; but the visible society exists not as an instru- 
 ment of external secular authority, but as the divine 
 home of spiritual edification, for the ' building up of 
 the body of Christ,' for the perfecting of man into 
 one into the unity of the life of God. 1 Therefore 
 the instrument of unity is the Spirit ; the basis of the 
 unity is Christ, the Mediator ; the centre of the unity 
 is in the heavens, where the Church's exalted Head 
 lives in eternal majesty human, yet glorified. If it 
 be the case, as Ignatius taught (and of course that is 
 still an open question in this discussion), that a 
 bishop is an essential element of the organization of 
 each visible Church, then he will be the centre and 
 symbol of local unity ; but, as the local Church exists 
 only in order to bring men into relation to Christ and 
 to the redeemed humanity which Christ is gathering 
 to Himself in the unseen world, so the catholic 
 Church, the society which each local Church repre- 
 sents, has its centre of unity in Christ. 2 Only (so to 
 speak) the lower limbs of the body of Christ are on 
 earth. The Church is a society in the world, but not 
 
 1 St. John xvii. 23. It is characteristic of the scriptural and fundamental idea of 
 church unity that it should be a progressive thing, progressing with a spiritual 
 advance ; not an external thing once for all imposed. See St John as above, St 
 Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians iv. 13 eU avSpa re\eiov. See also on the Shepherd 
 offfettnas, above p. 18. The unity of the Church becomes constantly closer as the 
 barriers which sin interposes between man and God, and so between man and his 
 fellows, are removed. Sin, on the other hand, tends to mar the unity by ' schisms ' 
 which may be more or less pronounced. 
 
 2 See the passage from Ignatius quoted before (p. 21) with the Bishop of Durham's 
 comment.
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 53 
 
 wholly in the world, nor existing for the world's ends. 
 Thus the primary importance of its organization is 
 local. Each local Church exists to keep open (so to 
 speak) the connection of earth and heaven ; to keep 
 the streams of the water of life flowing ; to maintain 
 and teach and protect the creed which moulds the 
 Christian character. Of course the Christian Churches 
 have a necessary relation to one another. They con- 
 stitute together one body ; they maintain one tradi- 
 tion, and the test of it is found in their consent ; they 
 exhibited, they ought still to exhibit, an unbroken 
 fellowship. At the same time each has a relative 
 independence, 1 for the authority over all is that of a 
 common tradition, of which the witness lies in the 
 general consent (as expressed most fully in a general 
 council), coupled with the canon of Scripture. 2 Such 
 is the conception of the Church as existing for the 
 ends of 'grace and truth,' which can be justly 
 described as Catholic. 3 
 
 Enough has been said to enable us to indicate by distinct fr 
 contrast what may historically be called its Roman modiffcati 
 development. The scriptural and catholic concep- 
 tion admitted of development in this sense, that 
 saving the original principle, the relations between 
 
 1 As St. Cyprian emphasized. See in chap. HI. 
 
 2 So the rule of faith is formulated by Irenaeus, i. 10. i, 2, and iii. 1-5, Tertull. de 
 Praescr. 27-36, Vincent. Commonit. a, 9, 20, 23, 29. 
 
 3 On this conception of the Church see a typical passage in St. Augustin Enarr. 
 in Psalm. Ps. Ivi. i : ' Quoniam totus Christus caput est et corpus . . . caput est 
 ipse salvator noster, passus sub Pontio Pilato, qui nunc postea quam resurrexit a 
 mortuis, sedet ad dexteram Patris : corpus autem eius est ecclesia ; non ista aut 
 ilia, sed toto orbe diffusa ; nee ea quae nunc est in hominibus qui praesentem vitani 
 agunt, sed ad earn pertinentibus etiam his qui fuerunt ante nos et his qui futuri sunt 
 post nos usque in finem saeculi. Tola enim ecclesia constans, ex omnibus fidelibus, 
 quia fideles omnes membra sunt Christi, habet illud caput positum in caelis quod 
 gubernat corpus suum ; etsi separatum est visione, sed annectitur caritate.' Cf. the 
 excellent account of the Church in Mr. Mason's The Faith of the Gospel ch. vn. 
 9, 10 and ch. vm.
 
 54 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 the different Churches admitted of elaboration as 
 facilities for communication increased under imperial 
 recognition, or as the authority of the common tradi- 
 tion was forced into prominence by the disintegrating 
 effects of Gnosticism and other heresies. But the 
 Roman development gave a new colour to the idea of 
 the Church, not indeed by the introduction of any 
 wholly novel element, but by distorting the idea of 
 its function and unity. It has been already noticed 
 how the Roman Church inherited the imperial con- 
 ceptions of empire and government. The injunction 
 
 ' Tu regere imperio populos, Romane, memento, 
 Parcere subiectis et debellare superbos ' 
 
 might have been spoken to the popes as well as to 
 the emperors. At Rome, then, to a slight extent 
 perhaps even from Victor's days to a more palpable 
 extent from the fifth century, the idea of the Church 
 becomes in a measure secularized. The Church be- 
 comes a great world-empire for purposes of spiritual 
 government and administration. The primary con- 
 ception of her unity becomes that of unity of govern- 
 ment, the sort of unity which most readily submits 
 itself to secular tests and most naturally postulates a 
 visible centre and head : the dominant idea becomes 
 that of authority. All the needs of the early mediaeval 
 period tended to add strength to this tendency, for 
 what the world wanted was above all things order, 
 discipline, rule. Thus the conception of government 
 tends to overshadow earlier conceptions of the 
 Church's function even in relation to the truth. 
 Compare the Roman Leo's view of the truth with 
 that of the Alexandrian Didymus or Athanasius, and 
 the contrast is marked. Both the western and 
 eastern writers insist equally on the truth of the
 
 I.] The Foundation of the Church. 55 
 
 Church dogma ; but to the eastern it is the guide to 
 the knowledge of God, to the western it is the instru- 
 ment of authority and of discipline. Once again, the 
 over-authoritativeness of tone which becomes charac- 
 teristic of the Roman Church makes her impatient 
 of the more slow and laborious and complex methods 
 of arriving at the truth on disputed questions which 
 belonged to the earlier idea of the 'rule of faith.' 
 The comparision of traditions, the elaborate appeal to 
 Scripture, these methods are too slow and sometimes 
 (as the revelation in this world is incomplete J ) yield no 
 decisive result : something is wanted more rapid, 
 more imperious. It is no longer enough to con- 
 ceive of the Church as the catholic witness to the 
 faith once for all delivered. She must be the 
 living voice of God, the oracle of the divine will. 
 Now, as the strength and security of witness lies in 
 the consent of independent testimonies, so the 
 strength of authoritative, oracular utterance lies 
 in unimpeded, unqualified centrality, and Christen- 
 dom needs a central shrine where divine authority 
 speaks. 
 
 Thus an essentially different idea of the Church's 
 function finds expression in the general councils and 
 in the papacy. At least a differently balanced idea 
 of the function of the episcopate finds expression in 
 the catholic conception of the bishop as securing the 
 channels of grace and truth and representing the 
 divine presence, and in the Roman conception of an 
 external hierarchy of government centering in the 
 papacy. The conflict between the two conceptions 
 begins perhaps even in the days of Victor or Stephen ; 
 it bears fruit in the Great Schism and in the further 
 
 1 Cf. i Cor. xiii. 9-12.
 
 56 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. I. 
 
 schisms of the Reformation. 1 Of course the Roman 
 doctrine of church unity does not annihilate the other 
 and older conception. The bishop remains still in the 
 Roman Church what he was from the beginning, but 
 another idea has been superadded, and it is this 
 superadded idea which differentiates the Romanized 
 from the primitive and undivided Church. With 
 this superadded conception we shall not be further 
 concerned in this argument. We have only to do 
 with the fundamental doctrine of the visible Church 
 as the body of Christ, which is inseparably associated 
 with the doctrine of the faith and the sacraments, and 
 which we are now in a position to assume was a con- 
 ception held from the first, running up for its primary 
 authority to the will of Christ the King. 
 
 1 It is not suggested that the Roman claims were more than one among several 
 causes of these schisms.
 
 CHAPTER II 
 
 APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION 
 
 JESUS CHRIST, we are now in a position to assume, pid Christ 
 founded a visible society, which, as embodying God's lULLt^* 
 new covenant with men and representing His good- 
 will towards them, was intended to embrace all 
 mankind. As that society has existed in history, it 
 has exhibited a more or less broad and marked dis- 
 tinction between clergy and laity, priests and people, 
 pastors and their flocks. Such a distinction would, 
 it may be argued, inevitably grow up on the same 
 principles which regulate the division of labour in 
 other departments of human life. The question then 
 arises : Is the Christian ministry simply, like a police 
 force, a body which it has been found advantageous 
 to organize and may be found advantageous to re- 
 organize ? Did Christ in instituting His society leave 
 it to itself to find out its need of a differentiation 
 of functions and develop a ministry, or did He, on 
 the other hand, when He constituted His society, 
 constitute its ministry also in the germ ? Did He 
 establish not only a body, but an organized body, 
 with a differentiation of functions impressed upon 
 it from the beginning ? 
 
 It may be urged that the former alternative is The idea not 
 more in accordance with what we should expect, 1 IIDpro1 
 
 1 As by Hatch B. L. pp. 17-20. 
 
 57
 
 58 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 for it will exhibit the Christian ministry as of a 
 piece with the ordinary products of social evolution. 
 Such a presumption might be met in a measure, 
 antecedently to the question of historical evidence, 
 by the consideration that founders of great institu- 
 tions, where they successfully observe and corre- 
 spond to the conditions of their time, are able, to a 
 certain degree at least, to anticipate the results of 
 evolution and impress upon their foundations from 
 the first an abiding form. 1 But it is a more satis- 
 factory consideration that the Church is naturally 
 of a piece with the Incarnation, the fruits of which it 
 perpetuates, and that, as was pointed out in the last 
 chapter, has a finality which belongs to its very 
 essence. It is not that the religion of Christ, as 
 final and supernatural, has no progress or develop- 
 ment in it ; it is not a code of rules covering all 
 possible occasions of the future. But it is a religion 
 which in its principles and essence is final which 
 contains in itself all the forces which the future will 
 need; so that there is nothing to be looked for in 
 the department of religion beyond or outside it, 
 while there is everything to be looked for from 
 within. This essential finality is expressed in the 
 once for all delivered faith, in the fulness of the 
 Spirit's presence and operation once for all granted 
 to the Church, in the visible society once for all 
 instituted ; and it is at least therefore a ' tenable 
 proposition ' 2 that it should have been expressed 
 
 1 This is conspicuously the case with Islam. Mahommed incorporated pre-existing 
 elements of Arab and Jewish belief of the Christian faith also in a debased form ; 
 it may be said with truth that there was no originality in the theology of Islam. But its 
 founder incorporated the elements that came to hand into a book, and on the basis 
 of his book founded a religion which with its motives, its institutions, its obligations 
 was a new thing in the world and yet had a remarkable completeness ab ovo. That 
 is to say, it was as complete as its fundamental idea would allow of its being. 
 
 > See Hatch B. L. [sec. ed.J pref. p. xii, where the coherence of ideas is recognised.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 59 
 
 in a once for all empowered and commissioned 
 ministry. 
 
 That it is much more than a ' tenable proposition ' 
 that it is a proposition which states a fact of 
 history it will be the business of succeeding 
 chapters to show. What it is proposed to do now but the prin 
 
 -M . . . cipleofthe 
 
 is to clear up the idea of the Christian ministry to ministry 
 
 i must be 
 
 explain what is meant by it, and why it is a reason- first ex- 
 
 i i i plained, 
 
 able idea before we go on to test, with as rigorous 
 a criticism as can be applied, its basis in history. 
 
 Why adopt such a method ? it will be said. Why 
 explain first what you are going to look for, and 
 then proceed to look for it? Why not let the 
 principle, whatever it may be, emerge simply from 
 the facts ? The answer is perhaps a twofold one. 
 First, that the method here proposed corresponds to 
 the method by which we actually in most cases 
 arrive at convictions. We do not start afresh ; we 
 take the traditional belief, the traditional position, 
 and test it. This is the normal method of human 
 progress. If the traditional belief will not bear the 
 light of facts, it has to be modified, or even reversed ; 
 we have to go through the process which a modern 
 writer calls ' the correction of our premises.' But we 
 give, and rightly give, a prerogative to an accepted 
 position, so far at least as to start from it. Secondly, 
 it may be answered that the method of hypothesis 
 is one of the most normal methods of scientific 
 inquiry. The scientific investigator is not asked to 
 approach the facts without antecedent ideas, without 
 anticipations, without desires ; to ask this of him in 
 the field of nature or of history is, in most cases, to 
 ask an impossibility. What we have a right to 
 expect is that the facts shall be looked at with
 
 60 Christian Ministry, [CHAP. 
 
 severe impartiality and be allowed their legitimate 
 weight to support, or contravene, or modify the 
 original hypothesis. And further, the scientific 
 investigator, when he makes public demonstration 
 of the results of his investigations, is not expected 
 to re-enact all the process he has himself gone 
 through. He asks the right question at once ; he 
 propounds at once the right hypothesis, and proceeds 
 to verify it. That is what it is proposed to do 
 here. There have been several theories or, to speak 
 more accurately, modifications of one theory of 
 the Christian ministry, which, as having more or less 
 authority in tradition, have some prerogative claims 
 to be examined, but which will not, as they are, 
 stand the verifying test of facts. Underlying them 
 there is a theory that will. There is, that is to say, 
 a number of more or less perverted conceptions of 
 what the Christian ministry has always essentially 
 meant, as well as a true one. In what follows an 
 attempt will be made to distinguish the true idea 
 from its perversions. 
 
 Any one who undertakes to vindicate for any 
 Christian truth or institution its claim to permanence 
 or authority its claim, that is, to be an integral part 
 of the Christian revelation is confronted on the 
 threshold of his undertaking with a difficulty. The 
 idea or institution has been abused, or overlaid with 
 what exaggerates or disfigures it. He has to attempt 
 what makes a considerable claim on mental patience, 
 to draw distinctions between the abuse of a thing 
 and its use, between the permanence of a thing in 
 its fundamental principle and its permanence with 
 the particular set of associations which in this or that 
 epoch have clustered round it. This is remarkably
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 61 
 
 true of the institution of the Christian ministry and 
 
 the associated idea of the apostolic succession. It because its 
 
 . , . , perversions 
 
 is maintained, though not perhaps with very much have caused 
 
 ,, _ _ . . . misunder- 
 
 truth, that superseded elements of Judaism survived standing. 
 and discoloured more or less the conception of the 
 ministry in the Church : it is much more certain that 
 in the early Middle Ages this, with every other 
 Christian institution, ran a great risk of becoming 
 incrusted with associations left by the dying forms 
 of paganism. Again, the ambition of the clergy and 
 the spiritual apathy and ignorance of the mass of the 
 laity have led to its assuming false claims and a false 
 prominence. Feudal and other passing forms of 
 political society have adopted it and more or less 
 perverted it to their own ends, so that, when their 
 day was over or their support withdrawn, it has been 
 left with its hold on human life weakened, because 
 its true nature was overlaid and forgotten. Once 
 again, it has lived in the security of uncritical epochs 
 and based its claims on careless statements, and the 
 steady rise of an exacter examination of facts has 
 seemed to shake its foundations. 
 
 Thus the conception of the ministry needs purging 
 before it can be vindicated. 1 ' There is a short way,' 
 
 1 The learned Oratorian Morinus, in his work de Sacris Ordinationibus (A.D. 
 1686), offers a good example of a Christian student purging an idea in order to 
 vindicate it. At the time when he wrote there were several false conceptions current 
 on his subject. Notably, it was held that the essential ' matter ' (or rite) of ordination 
 lay in the 'tradition of the instruments,' i.e. the giving to the ordinand the character- 
 istic vessels of his ministry. This scholastic doctrine had gained expression in a 
 formal papal decree, though Morinus does not mention this. Eugenius iv. had 
 written thus in his Decretum de Unione A rnteniorum (the decree which affirmed 
 the doctrinal basis of union with the see of Rome for the benefit of the Armenians, 
 who were seeking reunion at the time of the Council of Florence A.D. 1439) : 
 'Sextum sacramentum est ordinis, cuius mater ia est illud per cuius traditionem 
 confertur ordo, sicut presbyteratus traditur per calicis cum vino et patenae cum pane 
 porrectionem. Diaconatus vero per libri evangeliorum dationem. . . . Forma 
 sacerdotii talis est : Accipe potestatem offerendi sacrificium in ecclesia pro vivis et 
 mortuis, in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti : et sic de aliorum ordinum formis
 
 62 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 says St. Cyprian, ' for religious and simple minds to 
 lay aside error, or to find and elicit the truth. For, 
 if we go back to the head and origin of the divine 
 tradition, human error ceases : the real nature of the 
 heavenly mysteries is seen, and whatever was hid in 
 darkness and under a cloud is opened out into the 
 light of truth. If a canal which used to give a copious 
 supply of water suddenly fails, men go to the fount 
 to find the reason of the failure whether the water 
 has dried up at the spring, or has been intercepted in 
 mid-course ; so that, if this happened through a defect 
 in the canal preventing the flow of the water, it may 
 be repaired and the water gathered for the supply of 
 the city's wants may reach them in the abundance 
 and purity with which it left the fount. This is what, 
 on the present occasion, the priests of God should do, 
 keeping the divine precepts, so that, if the truth in 
 any matter has been weakened or impaired, we may 
 go back to the original of our Lord and His Gospel 
 or to the apostolic tradition, and let the principles of 
 
 prout in pontifical! Romano late continetur.' Labbe Collect. Concil. xviii. p. 550). 
 Here, it will be seen, there is no mention at all of the laying-on of hands, and this 
 represented for some centuries the authoritative doctrine. The absence of the 
 porrectio instrumentorum, with the accompanying words, from our ordination 
 of priests had been made the standing objection against the validity of our orders 
 (cf. Estcourt Question ofAngl. Ord. pp. 260-1). This was due, as Morinus remarks 
 (p. iii. ex. i. i. i), to the fact that the ' doctores scholastic! ' were ' Graecarum 
 ordinationum ignari et antiquae Latinorum traditionis incuriosi.' He was at pains 
 to make an appeal to antiquity. He investigated and reproduced in his work types 
 of early Oriental ordinations from ancient Greek and other Eastern MSS, and demon- 
 strated the absence of the ceremony in question from these rites. Yet Oriental 
 ordinations were confessedly valid. He then reproduced the earliest types of Western 
 ordinations from Latin MSS, and demonstrated that in the West the ceremony with 
 its accompanying words was a later addition unknown in the first thousand years of 
 the Church's history. He then asserted the principle that only that could be essential 
 which had been the practice both in East and West and the constant practice from 
 the first, i.e. the laying-on of hands with accompanying prayer. Thus he purged 
 the tradition. It is the frank inquiry which characterizes his work, and his genuine 
 belief in historical evidence and its value as a corrective of current teaching, which 
 has given his work the high place among works on ecclesiastical subjects which it 
 deservedly holds.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 63 
 
 our action take their rise there, where our order has 
 its origin.' J 
 
 Whether the idea now to be expounded represents 
 ' the original of our Lord ' and the ' apostolic tradi- 
 tion,' will be the question afterwards. We take it 
 now only as an hypothesis, and it is this. Let it be The idea of 
 
 J * the apostolic 
 
 supposed that Christ, in founding His Church, founded succession of 
 
 ' _, TT . the ministry. 
 
 also a ministry in the Church in the persons of His 
 Apostles. 2 These Apostles must be supposed to have 
 had a temporary function in their capacity as founders 
 under Christ. In this capacity they held an office 
 by its very nature not perpetual the office of bear- 
 ing the original witness to Christ's resurrection and 
 making the original proclamation of the Gospel. 3 
 But underlying this was another a pastorate of 
 
 1 Ep. Ixxiv. TO. 
 
 2 ' By the Church on earth," says MShler (Symbolism pt. i. ch. 5 36), ' Catholics 
 understand the visible community of believers, founded by Christ, in which, by means 
 of an enduring apostleship, established by Him and appointed to conduct all nations, 
 in the course of ages, back to God, the works wrought by Him during His earthly 
 life for the redemption and sanctification of mankind are, under the guidance of His 
 Spirit, continued unto the end of the world.' 
 
 3 See Pearson Determinatio Theol. i (in his Minor Theol. Works \. pp. 283, 284, 
 and quoted by Dr. Liddon in A Father in Christ [sec. ed.] pref. pp. x-xii) : ' Ordinem 
 episcopalem fuisse in ipsis apostolis institutum ac per successionem ab ipsis pro- 
 pagatum. Ad hanc assertionem explicandam sciendum est, concessam fuisse apostolis 
 duplicem potestatem, temporariam unam et extraordinariam, ordinariam alteram 
 diuque permansuram. Prior potestas duplicem respectum habuit, ad Christum et ad 
 ecclesiam. Respectu Christi facti sunt apostoli peculiares testes resurrectionis eius : 
 respectu domus Dei facti sunt lapides in fundamento, h.e. ad praedicandam fidem 
 baud prius revelatam, ad fundandas ecclesias, ad colligendum populum Deo instituti 
 et instruct!. Posterior potestas erat regendi ecclesias iam fundatas, praedicandi 
 verbum ndelibus collectis, administrandi sacramenta populo Dei, ordinandi ministros 
 ad ecclesiastica munia, peragendi omnia ad salutem Christianorum necessaria. 
 Quod erat in iis temporarium, id erat pure et peculiariter apostolicum ; quod autem 
 erat ordinarium et perpetuum, idem erat in eisdem proprie episcopale. Acceperunt 
 totam potestatem a Christo : quicquid erat in eis personale, cum ipsis mortuum est ; 
 quicquid erat omnibus ecclesiae temporibus necessarium, ipsorum, dum viverent, 
 manibus transmissum est. Dixit Christus apostolis ' Sicut misit me Pater, ita et ego 
 mitto vos.' Sicut ipse habuit a Patre mandatum docendi populum et ministros ad hoc 
 necessaries necessaria auctoritate instructos deputandi, ita et apostoli habuerunt idem 
 officium et mandatum cum eadem potestate ministros eligendi et ita successive usque 
 ad consummationem saeculi continuata successione. Est itaque apostolus episcopus 
 extraordinarius, est episcopus apostolus ordinarius; atque ita episcopatus fuit in 
 apostolis a Christo institutus, in successoribus apostolorom ab apostolis derivatus.'
 
 64 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 souls, a stewardship of divine mysteries. This office 
 instituted in their persons was intended to become 
 perpetual, and that by being transmitted from its 
 first depositaries. It was thus intended that there 
 should be in every Church, in each generation, an 
 authoritative stewardship of the grace and truth 
 which came by Jesus Christ and a recognised power 
 to transmit it, derived from above by apostolic 
 descent. The men, who from time to time were 
 to hold the various offices involved in the ministry 
 and the transmitting power necessary for its con- 
 tinuance, might, indeed, fitly be elected by those to 
 whom they were to minister. In this way the ministry 
 would express the representative principle. 1 But 
 their authority to minister in whatever capacity, 
 their qualifying consecration, was to come from 
 above, in such sense that no ministerial act could be 
 regarded as valid that is, as having the security of 
 the divine covenant about it unless it was performed 
 under the shelter of a commission, received by the 
 transmission of the original pastoral authority which 
 had been delegated by Christ Himself to His 
 Apostles. 
 
 This is what is understood by the apostolic suc- 
 cession of the ministry. It will be seen how, thus 
 conce i ve d, tne ministry corresponds in principle to 
 the Incarnation and the sacraments, and, indeed, to 
 the original creation of man. In all these cases the 
 material comes from below. Christ's humanity is of 
 real physical origin of the stock of Adam. The 
 material of the sacraments is common water, ' bread 
 of the earth,' common wine. ' Of the dust of the 
 
 1 Proper election was requisite, ' not for the authority itself but for the success of 
 the exercise of it ' : cf. Denton's Grace of the Ministry p. 183.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 65 
 
 ground the Lord God formed man.' But this material, 
 which is of the earth, is in each case assumed (though 
 not in each case in the same sense) by the Spirit 
 from above. The Divine Son assumes the humanity, 
 and makes it redemptive. A consecration from above 
 comes upon the sacrament; 'the bread which is of 
 the earth,' which man offers for the divine accept- 
 ance. ' receiving the invocation of God, is no longer 
 common bread, but Eucharist made up of two things, 
 an earthly and a heavenly.' J ' God breathed into 
 man's nostrils the breath of life.' In each of these 
 cases we have the material offered from below and 
 the empowering consecration from above. It is just 
 these two elements, then, that are present to con- 
 stitute the ministry. Those who are to be ordained 
 are, like the Levites, the offering of the people ; but 
 they receive, like Aaron and his sons, their consecra- 
 tion from above. 2 
 
 It is a matter of very great importance as will The principle 
 appear further on to exalt the principle of the moreTm^- 11 
 
 tant than the 
 form of the 
 
 1 Iren. iv. 18. 5. ministry. 
 
 2 In the Dissertation on the Christian Ministry, appended to his commentary 
 on the Philippians, (on which see Appended Note A,) Dr. Lightfoot maintains that 
 the priestly tribe of the Old Testament were only the ' delegates of the people ' 
 ' the nation thus deputes to a single tribe the priestly functions which belong to itself 
 as a whole ' (Dissert, pp. 182, 183). Surely 'dormitat Homerus.' His reference is 
 to the laying-on of hands by the people upon the Levites (Numb. viii. 10). But 
 whatever significance this act had, it must not lead us to forget the ordination of the 
 priests, the sons of Aaron. These had been consecrated to their office ' before this 
 laying-on of hands upon the Levites took place, and with far different ceremonies, 
 by Moses himself, without any intervention of the people whatever ' (Willis Worship 
 of 'the Old Covenant p. 112). Thus, if the Levites represent the self-consecration of 
 the people, the 'lay-priesthood,' (Numb. viii. 10-20,) Aaron, who is to 'offer the 
 Levites before the Lord ' (ver. ii) Aaron, to whom, with his sons, God is said to 
 have ' given the Levites as a gift to do the service of the children of Israel ' (ver. 19) 
 Aaron, and his sons the priests, represent the ministers of the covenant instituted 
 by God Himself, whose prerogative was so jealously guarded, even against the sons 
 of Levi, ' in the matter of Korah ' (Numb. xvi). ' Moses himself, as the representative 
 of the unseen King, is the consecrator" (Diet. Bible, s.v. PRIEST, ii. p. 917). I am 
 speaking of the Mosaic Law in its final 'form , as the writers of the New Testament 
 knew it, without discussing the date of its different portions.
 
 66 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 apostolic succession above the question of the exact 
 form of the ministry, in which the principle has 
 expressed itself, even though it be by apostolic order- 
 ing. What is meant is this : the apostolic succession 
 has taken shape how uniformly the next chapter 
 will show in a threefold ministry, consisting of a 
 single bishop in each community or diocese with 
 presbyters and deacons, the bishop alone having the 
 power of ordaining or conferring ministerial authority 
 on others, the presbyters constituting a 'co-opera- 
 tive order' which shares with him a common priest- 
 hood, and the deacons holding a subordinate and 
 supplementary position. But this is rather the out- 
 come of a principle than itself a principle, at any rate 
 a primary or essential principle. 1 No one, of whatever 
 part of the Church, can maintain that the existence 
 of what may be called, for lack of a distinctive term, 
 monepiscopacy is essential to the continuity of the 
 Church. Such monepiscopacy may be the best mode 
 of government, it may most aptly symbolize the 
 divine monarchy, it may have all spiritual expediency 
 and historical precedent on its side nay, more, 
 it may be of apostolic institution : but nobody could 
 maintain that the continuity of the Church would be 
 broken if in any given diocese all the presbyters were 
 consecrated to the episcopal office, and governed as a 
 co-ordinate college of bishops without presbyters, or 
 presbyter-bishops. 2 A state of things quite as abnor- 
 mal as this existed for many centuries in the Celtic 
 Church of Ireland. Something equivalent to this 
 
 1 See Church Principles, by W. E. Gladstone, pp. 244, 245, 252, 253. 
 
 2 'The things proper to bishops,' says Bishop Bilson (Perpet. Govt. of Christ 's 
 Church ch. xiii), ' which might not be common to presbyters, were singularity in 
 succeeding and superiority in ordaining." But of these two things the latter is 
 really that which forms the vital distinction between the orders.
 
 n.] Apostolic Succession. 67 
 
 very arrangement has been commonly believed in 
 the West to have existed in the early Church. 
 
 Why was the violation of the ordinary arrange- 
 ment of the ministry regarded in these cases as a 
 matter of only secondary importance ? Because the 
 principle of the apostolic succession was not violated. 
 There have always (it is here supposed) existed in 
 the Church ministers, who, besides the ordinary 
 exercise of their ministry, possess the power of 
 transmitting it ; they may, so far, be one or many in 
 each community ; but, when they ordain men to the 
 holy offices of the Church, they are only fulfilling the 
 function intrusted to them out of the apostolic fount 
 of authority. There are other ministers, again, who 
 have certain clearly understood functions committed 
 to them, but not that of transmitting their office. 
 Should these ever attempt to transmit it, their 
 act would be considered invalid. For this is the 
 church principle : that no ministry is valid which is 
 assumed, which a man takes upon himself, or which 
 is merely delegated to him from below. That 
 ministerial act alone is valid which is covered by a 
 ministerial commission received from above by suc- 
 cession from the Apostles. This is part of the great 
 principle of tradition. ' Hold the traditions,' reiter- 
 ates the Apostle. The whole of what constitutes 
 Christianity is a transmitted trust a tradition which 
 may need purging, but never admits of innovation, 
 for ' nihil innovandum nisi quod traditum ' is a 
 fundamental Christian principle. For instance, the 
 truth revealed in Christ is adequate to all time. 
 It is fruitful of innumerable applications and adap- 
 tations to the new wants of each age. It may need 
 setting free and purifying from accretions from time
 
 68 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 to time, but not more. What breaks the tradition 
 is heresy the intrusion, that is, of a new and alien 
 element into the deposit, having its origin in personal 
 self-assertion. This conception of heresy is involved 
 in the very idea of a revelation once for all made. 
 Now, what heresy is in the sphere of truth, a viola- 
 tion of the apostolic succession is in the tradition 
 of the ministry. Here too there is a deposit handed 
 down, an ecclesiastical trust transmitted ; and its 
 continuity is violated, whenever a man 'takes any 
 honour to himself and assumes a function not com- 
 mitted to him. Judged in the light of the Church's 
 mind as to the relation of the individual to the whole 
 body, sucli an act takes a moral discolouring. The 
 individual, of course, who is guilty of the act may 
 not incur the responsibility in any particular case 
 through the absence of right knowledge, or from other 
 causes which exempt from responsibility in whole or 
 in part ; but judged by an objective standard, the 
 act has the moral discolouring of self-assertion. The 
 Church's doctrine of succession is thus of a piece with 
 the whole idea of the Gospel revelation, as being the 
 communication of a divine gift which must be received 
 and cannot be originated, received, moreover.through 
 the channels of a visible and organic society ; and 
 the principle (this is what is here emphasized) lies at 
 the last resort in the idea of succession rather than in 
 the continuous existence of episcopal government 
 even though it should appear that this too is of apo- 
 stolic origin, and that the Church, since the Apostles, 
 has never conceived of itself as having any power to 
 originate or interpolate a new office. 1 
 
 1 The words of the Anglican Art. xxin. are : ' Non licet cuiquam sumere sibi 
 munus publice praedicandi aut administrandi sacramenta in ecclesia, nisi prius fuerit
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 69 
 
 It will be easy to see that the existence of an its import- 
 apostolic succession serves several important ends. 
 
 (i) It forms a link of historical continuity in a CO as a bond 
 
 . of union in a 
 
 society intended to be universal and permanent, spiritual 
 Nations have many bonds of union. There is the 
 unity of blood and language and common customs : 
 there is the unity of a common government over men 
 inhabiting a common territory, Such bonds of union 
 are lacking to a universal spiritual society such as 
 the Church claims to be. Embracing all peoples and 
 languages, admitting and consecrating the greatest 
 varieties of local custom and taste, inhabiting no 
 common territory but spread over all the earth, 1 how 
 should the Church preserve or exhibit its identity 
 and continuity as a visible society without some such 
 instrument and evidence of succession as is afforded 
 by the ministry as traditionally conceived? No 
 doubt it may be urged, and with partial truth, that 
 the real unity of the Church lies in the Spirit, which 
 lives in her, and the truth she holds and teaches ; but 
 that truth was committed to a society, as what Iren- 
 aeus calls ' its rich depository,' 2 and that Spirit has 
 a body and how can the outward organization, 
 which enshrines and perpetuates the inner life, main- 
 ad haec obeunda legitime vocatus et missus. Atque illos legitime vocatos et missos 
 existimare debemus, qui per homines, quibus potestas vocandi ministros 
 atque mittendi in vineam Domini publice concessa est, in ecclesia 
 cooptati fuerint et asciti in hoc opus.' 
 
 It should be noticed that the principle of mission is here asserted before the specific 
 reference to actual orders in the ministry (Art. xxxvi. with the ordinal read into it). 
 
 1 We know how familiar a boast this is with early Christian writers. Cf. e.g. Ef>. 
 ad Diogmt. 5 : ' Christians (of the " new race " which has just come into the world, 
 c. i) are distinguished from the rest of mankind neither by land, nor by language, 
 nor by customs. They have neither cities of their own, nor exceptional language, 
 uor remarkable mode of life. But inhabiting Greek or barbarian cities as the lot of 
 each determined, and obeying the local customs in dress and food and general 
 conduct of life, the character of their own polity which they exhibit is everywhere 
 wonderful and confessedly strange.' Cf. Iren. i. 10. 2. 
 
 - Iren. iii. 4. i : 'quasi in depositorium dives.'
 
 70 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 tain or exhibit its identity without some such bond 
 as the apostolic succession of the ministry affords ? x 
 
 (ii) The ministerial succession serves the end of 
 dependence impressing upon Christians that their new life is a 
 of Christ ; communicated gift, and from this point of view it is 
 naturally associated with the sacraments. A Chris- 
 tian of apostolic days was taught by St. Paul to 
 look back to the day of baptism as the moment of 
 his incorporation into the life of Christ. 2 He had 
 received the gift of the Spirit by the laying on of 
 apostolic hands. 3 He was fed with the Body and 
 Blood of Christ through the ' effectual signs ' of 
 bread and wine. 4 This sacramental method went to 
 impress upon his mind the idea of his dependence 
 upon grace given from without. True, this grace 
 given from without could only be appropriated, in- 
 corporated, used, by the inward faculty of faith. 
 This is the Christian principle of correspondence. 
 When Christ was on earth healing men's sickness, 
 the ' virtue' which went out of Him could speaking 
 generally only be liberated to act in effective power 
 on those who had ' faith to be healed,' and it was 
 thus men's faith which made them whole, though the 
 means of their healing was the virtue of Christ's 
 body which came from without. His permanent 
 redemptive activity upon the souls of men exhibits, 
 
 1 For an interesting statement of the function of the episcopal succession from this 
 point of view, see F. D. Maurice's Kingdom of Christ pt. ii. ch. iv. 5 ; also 
 Gladstone Church Principles ch. v. esp. pp. 193, 194 : ' If it were attempted to insist 
 on succession in doctrine as the sole condition of the essence of a Church, any such 
 proposition would be self-contradictory, inasmuch as that which would be thus per- 
 petuated would not be a society at all, but a creed or body of tenets." What is 
 required is 'succession of persons,' as well as 'continuous identity of doctrine.' 
 
 - Gal. iii. 27 ; Rom. vi. 3 ; i Cor. xii. 13 ; Tit. iii. 5. 
 
 3 Acts viii. 17-20, xix. 6 ; cf. Heb. vi. 2. 
 
 4 i Cor. x. 16, 17. I do not see how it is possible to deny that the New Testament 
 does attach inward gifts to external channels, i.e. is sacramental.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 7 1 
 
 and with less possibility of exception, the same law. 
 He saves in virtue of an inward faith but by the 
 instrumentality of a gift given from outside. This 
 outward bestowal of grace was no peculiarity of the 
 Apostolic age, though the symbolic miracles which 
 at first called attention to it passed away. It is im- 
 possible to deny that the early Christians believed in 
 the sacraments as the covenanted channels of divine 
 grace. 1 It is, indeed, part of God's condescending 
 compassion that He should thus embody in visible 
 form His divine gift So it is made most easily 
 
 1 I may refer, in confirmation of what is said above, to the way in which the 
 Fathers, at the end of the second century, emphasize the sacramental principle, as of 
 a piece with the principle of the Incarnation, against the Gnostic depreciation of what 
 is material. See a vigorous passage of Tertullian (de Returr. Cam. 8), emphasizing 
 how, at each stage of the spiritual life, the inward gift is mediated through the 
 material body and that, of course, implies through a material sacrament. ' As the 
 soul is attached to God, it is the flesh which enables it to be united. The flesh is 
 washed that the soul may be cleansed : the flesh is anointed that the soul may be 
 consecrated : the flesh is marked with the Cross that the soul may be protected : the 
 flesh is shadowed with the imposition of hands that the soul may be illuminated by 
 the Spirit : the flesh is fed with the Body and Blood of Christ that the soul may feed 
 upon the fatness of God.' Cf. de Bapt. 2, quoted on p. 165. This is no advance 
 upon the principle of Irenaeus. To Irenaeus the bread and wine are consecrated to 
 become the Body and Blood of Christ, and so to impart eternal life even to man's 
 body (iv. 18. 5): 'the mixed cup and the bread which has been made receives the 
 word of God, and the Eucharist becomes the Body [and Blood] of Christ, and the 
 substance of our flesh grows and gains consistence from these. How, then, can they 
 say that our flesh is not susceptible of the gift of God, which is eternal life our flesh, 
 which is nourished by the Body and Blood of the Lord, and which is his member?' 
 (v. 2. 3). Irenaeus' contemporary at Alexandria, Clement (though his exact view of 
 the Eucharist is hard to grasp or state) certainly believed that the sacraments convey 
 to us the life and being of Christ ; cf. Paed. \. 6. This would appear in Dr. Bigg's 
 references B. L. pp. 105, 106. But we may go back earlier. The simple account, 
 which, earlier in the second century, Justin Martyr gives of the meaning of the Chris- 
 tian sacraments (Apol. i. 61, 65-67), carries conviction that Irenaeus and Tertullian 
 are stating no new doctrine. We go back to the beginning of the century, to Ignatius, 
 and we find the same stress on the sacraments in the earliest stage of controversy with 
 Gnosticism. ' The heretics,' he writes (ad Smyrn. 7), ' abstain from the Eucharist 
 and prayer, because they confess not that the Eucharist is the Flesh of our Saviour 
 Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, which by His goodness the Father raised 
 up. They, therefore, who speak against the gift of God, die by their disputing.' 
 [Dr. Lightfoot would interpret this in the light of Tertullian's ' Hoc est corpus meum : 
 id est figura mei corporis.' Tertullian's language about the Eucharist is remarkable, 
 but taken as a whole it suggests not that he believed in no ' real presence ' in the 
 elements, but that he regarded the consecrated bread as a figure of Christ's body, in
 
 72 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 intelligible and accessible to the ignorant. 1 So it is 
 most easily and forcibly impressed on men's minds 
 that Christ has come, not merely to show them what 
 in any case they are, but to make them what apart 
 from Him they cannot be. ' Except a man be born 
 of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the 
 kingdom of God.' ' Except ye eat the flesh of the 
 Son of Man, and drink His blood, ye have no life in 
 you.' z 
 
 Aristotle represented man as ' self-sufficient ' not 
 indeed as an individual, but as a member of an 
 organized society, the city of Greek civilization. If 
 he needed to come into contact with God, that was 
 rather at the circumference of his life and as the 
 remote goal of its highest efforts. Christianity, on 
 the contrary, represents man as fundamentally and 
 from the first dependent upon God. It proclaims 
 that man's initial step of true progress is to know his 
 utter, his complete dependence, that the essence 
 and secret of all sin is his claim to be independent, 
 to be sufficient for himself. Thus Christ, when He 
 
 the sense that, remaining bread, it so to speak (like Christ's body on earth) embodied 
 the spiritual presence or spirit of Christ which it was to communicate : see my Disser- 
 tations (Murray, 1895), pp. 308, ff.]. The earliest language about baptism also is 
 very emphatic in making it the instrument of the new birth and its accompanying 
 purification. See Hermas Vis. iii. 3, Sim. ix. 16, and Barnabas Ep. n. The only 
 early Christian writings which seem to take a low view of the sacraments are very 
 Judaic, e.g. the (Ebionite) Clementines and the Didache, which, though not 
 Ebionite, has no hold on the doctrine of the Incarnation or of the grace which flows 
 from it. 
 
 1 It is instructive to contrast in this respect Christianity with Neo-PIatonism. 
 Communion with God oneness with God was regarded by the philosophers as 
 attainable only through intellectual self-abstraction from the things of sense and an 
 ecstatic rapture possible but to a very few ' select ' natures. In the Church it was 
 believed to depend upon a simple act, possible to the most ignorant. ' Take, eat ; 
 this is My Body.' 'He that eateth My Flesh dwelleth in Me, and I in him.' 
 
 2 F. W. Robertson (Sermons, ad series, pp. 55, 56) attempts to make baptism 
 merely an announcement of what is, instead of a creative or re-creative act : but this 
 is to do violence to the whole body of Scriptural and ecclesiastical language. The 
 Church is the 'new creation, 1 and the sacraments are 'practica* or 'efficacia signa."
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 73 
 
 came to restore men to their true selves and to God, 
 did all that was necessary to emphasize that their 
 restoration must be by the communication of a gift 
 from outside, which they had not and could not have 
 of themselves. This is the essential message of 
 Christianity, and is what differentiates its whole 
 moral scheme from its very foundations. But in the 
 second part of the Aristotelian position Christianity 
 recognises a divine truth, of which man had never 
 lost his hold ; man must still realize his true being 
 in a society, the city of God. Only in the divine 
 household of the Church can he be fed with his 
 necessary portion, the bread of life. 
 
 Yet if it be important to impress upon men's minds, 
 permanently and persistently, as a part of a catholic 
 system, their dependence upon gifts bestowed from 
 outside, it must be admitted that there is no way of 
 making the impression more effective than by the 
 institution in the Christian household of a steward- 
 ship, which should represent God, the giver, dis- 
 tributing to the members of the divine family their 
 portion of meat in due season ; and it is quite 
 essential that such stewards should receive their 
 authorization by a commission which makes them 
 the representatives of God the giver, and not of men 
 the receivers. ' It is the doctrine of the ministerial 
 succession by commission from the Apostles, which 
 makes, and which alone makes, this required pro- 
 vision for representing to us, along with the matter 
 of the revelation, and as needful to its due reception, 
 this lively idea of its origin.' * 
 
 (iii) The apostolic succession seems to correspond, (m) as meet- 
 as nothing else does, to the moral needs of the HULL of" 101 
 
 those who 
 1 Gladstone Church Principles p. ao8. minister.
 
 74 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 ministers of Christ's Church. 1 ' How shall they 
 preach,' said St. Paul, ' except they be sent ? ' He 
 himself had been sent by an immediate mission from 
 Christ as direct, as visible (so he believed) as that 
 which empowered the other Apostles. When he 
 exhorts Timothy to make ' full proof of his ministry,' 
 it is by recalling his mind to an actual external com- 
 mission received, with its actual and accompanying 
 gift. ' There is not in the world,' says Bishop Taylor, 
 ' a greater presumption than that any should think 
 to convey a gift of God, unless by God he be 
 appointed to do it.' 2 Such appointment or com- 
 mission, to be valid, must be of an authority not 
 unquestioned indeed, for St. Paul's was questioned, 
 but not justly open to question, as representative of 
 Christ. Men are needed for Christ's ministry who 
 have ready wills and clear convictions, men, that is, 
 with a sense of vocation ; but they must be also men 
 of humility, distrustful of their own impulses and 
 powers, like the prophets of old. The very thing 
 that such men need is the open and external com- 
 mission to support the internal sense of vocation 
 through all the fiery trials of failure and disappoint- 
 ment, of weariness and weakness, to which it will 
 be subjected nay, to be its substitute when God's 
 inward voice seems even withdrawn maintaining in 
 the man the simple conviction that, as a matter of 
 fact, ' a dispensation has been committed to him.' 
 
 The idea of the apostolic succession is, then, we 
 may claim, in natural harmony both with the moral 
 needs of men and with the idea of the Church. Such 
 a succession of ministers would serve, as nothing else 
 
 1 See Dr. Liddon's sermon The Moral Value of a Mission from Christ. 
 - Ductor Dubitant. in his Works [ed. 1822] xiv. p. 26.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 75 
 
 could serve, both as a link of continuity in the 
 society, and as an institution calculated to represent 
 to men's imaginations the dependence of the Christian 
 life upon God's gifts, and as a means of supplying 
 a satisfying commission to those called to share the 
 ministry. 
 
 On the other hand, objections are raised against it Bu t it 
 which may best be considered before we approach 
 the discussion of the historical evidence, especially unds: 
 as the consideration of them will serve to put more 
 clearly before our minds what the exact conception 
 is which is to be subjected to the test of history. 
 
 The most important of them may be summarized 
 under five heads : 
 
 (1) the doctrine of the apostolic succession is 
 
 sacerdotal : 
 
 (2) it postulates what is so incredible that bad 
 
 or unspiritual men can impart spiritual gifts 
 to others : 
 
 (3) it is incompatible with the true ideal of 
 
 liberty : 
 
 (4) the chances against its having been actually 
 
 preserved are overwhelming : 
 
 (5) it is exclusive in such a sense as to be fatal to 
 
 its claim. 
 
 (i) 'The doctrine of the apostolic succession is or it is 
 sacerdotal.' This we admit in one sense and deny in ** 
 another. It is necessary for us in fact to draw a 
 distinction between what we regard as legitimate and 
 what as illegitimate sacerdotalism. 1 For the term is 
 associated historically with much that is worst, as 
 well as much that is best in human character. Priest- 
 
 1 Dr. Liddon University Sermons, 2nd series, p. 191 : 'A formidable word, 
 harmless in itself, but surrounded with very invidious associations.' See the whole 
 passage.
 
 76 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 hood has been greatly abused. But must not the 
 same be said of liberty or of State authority ? Must 
 not it be said of religion itself, in common with all 
 the greatest and most ennobling truths? What 
 would become of us if we should agree to abandon 
 every idea and institution which has become corrupt, 
 or been exaggerated, or made to minister to ambition 
 and worldliness? Life would be a barren thing 
 indeed ! There is surely no better task for the wise 
 man than to set himself to vindicate the truths which 
 lie behind persistent and popular errors and abuses 
 to the reality and power of which, indeed, the very 
 popularity and persistence of the abuses bear 
 witness. 
 The minis- The chief of the ideas commonly associated with 
 
 terial priest- i ...... , . . 
 
 hood, how- sacerdotalism, which it is important to repudiate, is 
 vicious. that of a vicarious priesthood. 1 It is contrary to the 
 true spirit of the Christian religion to introduce the 
 notion of a class inside the Church who are in a 
 closer spiritual relationship to God than their fellows. 
 ' If a monk falls,' says St. Jerome, ' a priest shall 
 pray for him ; but who shall pray for a priest who 
 has fallen ? ' Such an expression, construed literally, 
 would imply a closer relation to God in the priest 
 than in the consecrated layman, and such a concep- 
 tion is beyond a doubt alien to the spirit of Chris- 
 tianity. There is 'no sacrificial tribe or class be- 
 tween God and man.' ' Each individual member [of 
 the Christian body] holds personal communion with 
 , the Divine Head.' 2 The difference between clergy 
 and laity ' is not a difference in kind ' 3 but in function. 
 Thus the completest freedom of access to God in 
 
 1 Sec Maurice Kingdom of Christ ii. p. 216. 
 
 2 Dr. Lightfoot Dissert, on the Christian Ministry p. 181. 
 
 3 Liddon I.e. p. 198.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 77 
 
 prayer and intercession, the closest personal relation 
 to Him, belongs to all. So far as there is gradation 
 in the efficacy of prayers, it is the result not of official 
 position but of growing sanctity and strengthening 
 faith. It is an abuse of the sacerdotal conception, 
 if it is supposed that the priesthood exists to cele- 
 brate sacrifices or acts of worship in the place of the 
 body of the people or as their substitute. This con- 
 ception had, no doubt, attached itself to the ' massing 
 priests ' of the Middle Ages. The priest had come to 
 be regarded as an individual who held, in virtue of 
 his ordination, the prerogative of offering sacrifices 
 which could win God's gifts. Thus spiritual advan- 
 tages could be secured for the living and the dead 
 by paying him to say a mass, and greater advantages 
 by a greater number of masses. Now this distorted 
 sort of conception is one which the religious indolence 
 of most men, 1 in co-operation with the ambition for 
 power in ' spiritual ' persons, is always tending to 
 make possible. It is possible to believe not only in 
 a ^pcarious priesthood of sacrifice, but also in a 
 vicarious office of preaching, which releases the laity 
 Trom the obligation to make efforts of spiritual appre- 
 hension on their own account. But in either case the 
 conception is an unchristian one. The ministry is no 
 more one of vicarious action than it is one of 
 exclusive knowledge or exclusive spiritual relation 
 to God. What is the truth then ? It is that the 
 Church is one body : the free approach to God in the but 
 Sonship and Priesthood of Christ belongs to men as x ' 
 members of 'one body,' and this one body has 
 different organs through which the functions of its 
 
 ' * Cf. p. 307, where stress is laid upon the disastrous effect of secularly in the 
 Church in widening the gulf between clergy and laity.
 
 78 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 life find expression, as it was differentiated by the 
 act and appointment of Him who created it. The 
 reception, for instance, of Eucharistic grace, the 
 approach to God in Eucharistic sacrifice, are functions 
 of the whole body. ' We bless the cup of blessing,' 
 ' we break the bread,' says St. Paul, speaking for the 
 community : ' we offer,' l we present/ is the language 
 of the liturgies. 1 But the ministry is the organ the 
 necessary organ of these functions. It is the hand 
 which offers and distributes ; it is the voice which 
 consecrates and pleads. And the whole body can no 
 more dispense with its services than the natural 
 body can grasp or speak without the instrumentality 
 of hand and tongue. Thus the ministry is the 
 instrument as well as the symbol of the Church's 
 unity, and no man can share her fellowship except in 
 acceptance of its offices. 
 
 Why is this conception unreasonable ? The people 
 of Israel of old were ' a kingdom of priests, and an 
 holy nation' (Exod. xix. 6). But that priestliness 
 
 1 i Cor. x. 16. It is remarkable that Hugh of St. Victor (Summ. Sentent. tract 
 vi. c. 9, quoted by Morinus de Sacr. Ord. p. iii. ex. v. i. 4) gives as the current 
 reason for denying that heretics or schismatics could consecrate the Eucharist the 
 fact that in the Eucharist the priest speaks for the whole Church : ' Aliis videtur 
 quod nee excommunicati nee manifeste haeretici conficiunt [corpus Christ!]. Nullus 
 enim in ipsa consecratione dicit offero, sed offerimus, ex persona totius ecclesiae. 
 Cum autem alia sacramenta extra ecclesiam possint fieri, haec nunquam extra, et 
 istis magis videtur assentiendum.' The idea of the representative character of the 
 priesthood in the ministry of the eucharistic sacrifice finds beautiful expression in 
 the prayers (ascribed traditionally to St. Ambrose) which are used in the West as a 
 Preparatio ad Missam : ' Profero etiam,' the celebrant prays, '(M digneris propitius 
 intueri) tribulationes plebium, pericula populorum, captivorum gemitus, miserias 
 orphanorum, necessitates peregrinorum, inopiam debilium, desperationes languen- 
 thim, defectus senum, suspiria iuvenum, vota virginum, lamenta viduarum.' He is 
 the mouthpiece of the needs of ' all sorts and conditions of men.' As the necessary 
 mouthpiece for the expression of these needs in the eucharistic celebration, the repre- 
 sentative priest is in a certain sense a go-between, a mediator. Thus this same prayer 
 has earlier these words : ' quoniam me peccatorem inter te et eundem populum tuum 
 medium esse voluisti, licet in me aliquod boni operis testimonium non agnoscas, 
 omcium saltern dispensationis creditae non recuses, nee per me indignum eorum 
 salutis pereat pretium, pro quibus victima salutaris dignatus es esse et redemptio.'
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 79 
 
 which inhered in the race had its expression in the 
 divinely ordained ministry of the Aaronic priesthood. 1 
 The Christian Church is in an infinitely higher sense 
 ' a royal priesthood, a holy nation.' 2 But why should it u not 
 
 . ... 111 t_ i inconsistent 
 
 that priesthood exclude, and not rather involve, a with the 
 ministry through which it finds official and formal priesthood, 
 expression and that not by mere expediential 
 arrangement, but by divine ordering ? Let us 
 examine the notion of the general priesthood of all 
 Christians as it finds expression, for example, in 
 Justin Martyr in the earlier part of the second 
 century. 3 
 
 'Just,' he says, 'as Joshua, who is called by the prophet (Zech. as taught 
 iii. i ) a priest, was seen wearing filthy garments . . . and was called y J 1151111 ' 
 a brand plucked out of the burning because he received remission of 
 sins, the devil also, his adversary, receiving rebuke, so we, who 
 through the name of Jesus have believed as one man in God, the Maker 
 of all, have been stripped through the name of His First-begotten Son 
 of the " filthy garments " of our sins ; and being set on fire by the 
 word of his calling are the genuine high-priestly race of God, as God 
 
 1 It is maintained without any adequate ground (Diet. Bible s. v. PRIESTHOOD) 
 that the Levitical priesthood was in a sense the substitute for the general priesthood, 
 instead of its expression that the special priesthood was appointed because the 
 people refused to realize the priesthood which belonged to them all so that it was 
 in this sense a. pis oiler, a ievrepos irXous. There is no evidence for this. The same 
 chapter which recognises the general, recognises also aspecial priesthood, Exod. xix. 
 22-24. It would appear in fact that the developed conception of the Jewish priest- 
 hood as maintaining the consecration and holiness of the whole nation in its relation 
 to Jehovah, the conception which is prominent in Ezekiel (chap, xliii. ff.) and in the 
 Law of Holiness (Levit. xvii. -xxvi), is but the expression of the fundamental idea of 
 the 'priestly kingdom,' i.e. the ' peculiar 1 people consecrated to Jehovah, cf. Deut. 
 vii. 6, xiv. 2, xxvi. 18. 'The business of the priest,' says Mr. Montefiore (Hibbert 
 Lectures, 1892, p. 318), ' is to make a holy community among whom God may dwell 
 . . . It is the central conception of the priestly code." 
 
 - jSaffiAetov iepamifto, i Pet ii. 2. /3a<riAei'a, iepeis T<U 9cJ, Rev. i. 6. St. Peter 
 is quoting and St. John referring to the words in Exodus. 
 
 I do not wish to press the analogy of the old and new covenants too far. Single 
 Christians are often spoken of as ' priests,' and not merely as belonging to a priestly 
 race. This is natural enough. For undoubtedly all Christians have an individual 
 union with God and freedom of approach to God, which (so to speak) individualizes 
 that in them which can be. rightly called priesthood. I only use the argument to 
 prove this that a ministerial priesthood is in no contradictory relation to a general 
 priesthood. 
 
 3 Dial. c. Tryph. 116, 117.
 
 8o Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 beareth witness Himself, saying that "in every place amongst the 
 gentiles men are offering sacrifices acceptable to Him and pure," and 
 God receives from no man sacrifices, except through His priests. So, 
 then, of all the sacrifices through this name, which Jesus the Christ 
 delivered to be made, that is (the sacrifices) at the Eucharist of the 
 bread and of the cup, which in every place of the earth are made 
 by the Christians, God by anticipation beareth witness that they are 
 acceptable to Him.' 
 
 Here is indeed a vivid consciousness of the priest- 
 hood, which belongs to the Church as a whole, 1 but 
 finds expression in a great ceremonial action the 
 Eucharist an action which belongs not to the indi- 
 vidual but to the whole body, and is celebrated by 
 the ' president of the brethren.' 2 How, then, is this 
 priesthood interfered with, if we should find reason 
 to believe that Christ Himself ordained ministers of 
 this mystical action such as did actually exist in 
 Justin Martyr's days to be the mouthpieces of the 
 Church in its celebration ? 
 
 No one, again, is more identified than Irenaeus 
 with the principle of the apostolic succession. He 
 regards it undoubtedly as of the essence of the 
 Church. Her mark, her character, is ' according to 
 the successions of the bishops.' 3 Yet he does not 
 hesitate to say that in some sense ' every just man is 
 
 1 It appears that the idea of the priesthood of the Christian Church as a whole 
 carried with it a thought not to be found in the Old Testament, at least directly 
 the thought of approach to God on behalf of others. The Christians are high priests 
 on behalf of the world. They are the ' soul of the world ' ; the world is their prison- 
 house, but they ' keep it together ' (Ep. ad Diognet. 6). They can plead effectually 
 for the empire and mankind. So Aristides, Apol. c. 16 : .' I have no doubt that the 
 world stands by reason of the intercession of Christians,' cf. Tertull. Apol. c. 30. 
 This function of the Church St. Paul presses on St. Timothy. The Church is not 
 to confine intercessions to her own body ' I exhort that prayer, etc. , be made for 
 all men,' ' for God will have all men to be saved ' ; ' He is the Saviour of all men,' 
 though 'specially of them that believe' (i Tim. ii. 1-4; iv. 10). 
 
 2 7rpocT'|<tptTai TO! irpoecrrum T<OI> a6eA<f>a>i' aprot (cat TTOTJJpioi' (Apol. i. 65). He 
 offers the prayer and Eucharist, and the people say Amen. This 'president' is 
 presumably the bishop. So Harnack (Expositor, May 1887, p. 336). 
 
 3 iv. 33. 8. : ' character corporis Christi secundum successiones episcoporum.'
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 8 1 
 
 of the priestly order/ and 'all the disciples of the 
 Lord are priests and Levites ' that is, they have the 
 freedom of the old priesthood, not its ministry. 1 If 
 it be said that Irenaeus is admittedly ' unsacerdotal,' 
 that is, that he does not apply the term priesthood 
 to the Christian ministry, 2 it may be pointed out, 
 further, that writers, who confessedly are sacerdotal 
 in their conception of the ministry, still continue down and later 
 into the Middle Ages to speak also without hesitation 
 of the general priesthood. 3 For the official hierarchy 
 
 1 iv. 8. 5 and v. 34. 3 ; see Lightfoot Dissert, p. 252. The point in both passages 
 is that our Lord in justifying the conduct of His disciples when they broke the 
 Sabbath (St. Matt. xii. 1-5) claimed for them and for David in virtue of their 
 righteousness the freedom of priests, ' who profane the Sabbath and are blameless.' 
 Again, inasmuch as, like the Levites, our Lord's disciples had ' no inheritance,' 
 they could, like the Levites, claim support. Thus ' they were allowed when hungry 
 to take food of the grains.' In both cases the priesthood which belongs to good 
 men or disciples lies in a certain freedom, not in any power of ministry. 
 
 2 See further in chap. in. I have endeavoured there to point out that the idea of 
 a gradual growth in sacerdotalism in the early Church hardly corresponds to the 
 facts. There is a change rather in language than in principle. 
 
 3 Thus Origen (for whose admittedly sacerdotal view of the ministry see further 
 in chap, m.) in some passages ' takes spiritual enlightenment and not sacerdotal 
 office to be the Christian counterpart to the Aaronic priesthood.' (Lightfoot Dissert. 
 p. 255) ; cf. in loann. i. 3. : ' Those who are devoted to the divine word, and are 
 dedicated sincerely to the sole worship of God, may not unreasonably be called 
 priests and Levites according to the difference in this respect of their impulses tend- 
 ing thereto. . . . Those that excel the men of their own generation perchance will 
 be high-priests' (Lightfoot's trans.); see also in Lev. iv. 6, vi. 5, ix. i, 8, xiii. 5. 
 He uses such language, however, with qualifications 'secundum moralem locum,' 
 ' secundum spiritalem intelligentiam ' (in Lev. i. 5, ii. 4, ix. 6, xv. 3), i.e. he draws a 
 distinction between the moral and ministerial sense of priesthood ; see Dr. Bigg's 
 note, B. L. p. 215 note *. He adds that 'in Num. ii. i . . . priests, virgins, 
 ascetics are said to be in professione religionis; in lesu Nave xvii. 2 shows 
 that there was a strong tendency in Origen's mind to restrict the language concern- 
 ing the priesthood of the Christian to those "religious."' So also among the 
 scholia on the Apocalypse ascribed to Victorinus of Petau (but not by him in their 
 present form) occurs the following one. xx : 'Qui enim virginitatis integrum serva- 
 verit propositum et decalogi fideliter praecepta impleverit . . . iste vere sacerdos est 
 Christi et millenarium numerum perficiens integre creditur regnare cum Christo et 
 apud eum recte ligatus est diabolus.' 
 
 For a recognition of the general priesthood among later sacerdotal writers, cf. 
 Leo the Great Serm. iii. i: 'ut in populo adoptionis Dei, cuius universitas 
 sacerdotalis atque regalis'est, non praerogativa terrenae originis obtineat 
 unctionem, sed dignatio caelestis gratiae gignat antistitem.' Serm. iv. i : ' In 
 unitate igitur fidei atque baptismatis indiscreta nobis societas et generalis 
 est dignitas, secundum illud beatissimi Petri. . . . Vos autem genus electum, 
 
 F
 
 82 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 offered no bar to its recognition, provided that the 
 general priesthood was not supposed by those church- 
 men who recognised it (as in fact it was not) to carry 
 with it the power of ministry. It may be worth 
 while to quote a passage which seems to push to its 
 extremest point the right of the priesthood which is 
 common to all in virtue of their baptism and con- 
 firmation. 
 
 regale sacerdotium.' August, de Civ. Dei xvii. 5. 5: 'Sacerdotium quippe 
 hie ipsam plebem dicit, cuius plebis ille sacerdos est mediator Dei et hominum 
 homo Christus lesus.' Quaest. Evang. ii. 40. 3 : ' Sacerdotium vero ludaeorum 
 nemo fere fidelium dubitat figuram fuisse futuri sacerdotii regalis, quod est 
 in ecclesia, quo consecrantur omnes pertinentes ad corpus Christ! 
 summi et veri principis sacerdotum. Nam nunc et omnes unguuntur quod tune 
 regibus tantum et sacerdotibus fiebat, . . . ipsi nondum accepto baptismatis sacra- 
 mento nondum spiritaliter ad sacerdotes pervenerant.' See the same idea in a collect 
 of the Gelasian Sacramentary (Bright Ancient Collects p. 99). Hence we get a 
 priesthood ascribed, as by St. Irenaeus, to each Christian (though of course as a 
 member of the one body) in virtue of baptism and unction. St. Jerome (adv. 
 Lucifer. 4) writes : 'sacerdotium laici id est baptisma.' So Isidore of Seville 
 (de Eccl. Off. ii. 25) writes : ' Postquam Dominus noster verus rex et sacerdos aeter- 
 nus, a Deo Patre caelesti mystico unguento est delibutus, iam non soli pontifices et 
 reges sed omnis ecclesia unctione chrismatis consecratur, pro eo quod 
 membrum est aeterni sacerdotis et regis. Ergo quia genus regale et sacerdotalc 
 sumus, ideo post lavacrum ungimur, ut Christi nomine censeamur.' Cf. Alcuin 
 [Albinus Flaccus] Ep. ad Oduinum, ap. Hittorp. de Div. Cath. Eccl. Offic. [Colon. 
 1568] p. 100 : ' Sacro chrismate caput pungitur . . . ut intelligat se diadema regni et 
 sacerdotii dignitatem portaturum ' ; Rabanus Maurus de Inst. Cler. i. 29 
 ap. Hittorp. p. 322 ; Walafrid Strabo de Reb. Eccl. 16, ap. Hittorp. p. 401 of the 
 common priesthood of all in the Eucharist, the generale sacerdotium; Ivo 
 Carnot. ap. Hittorp. p. 469 ; Paschasius Radbert de corf, et sang. Domini ix. 6 : 
 ' Idcirco teneamus nos ad istum pontificem et sacerdotem Christum, et in illo 
 maneamus, quia per hoc quod ille in nobis est et nos in illo, etiam et ipsi omnes 
 sacerdotes dicimur et sumus ' ; cf. St. Thomas Aquinas Sum. iii. q. 82. art i. 
 ' Laicus iustus unitus est Christo unione spiritali per fidem et charitatem, non autem 
 per sacramentalem potestatem ; et ideo habet spiritale sacerdotium ad offerendum 
 spiritales hostias.' 
 
 The consideration of such passages as these will serve to show that sacerdotalism 
 is not incompatible with an even zealous recognition of a lay priesthood. The only 
 form of expression which seems to have passed away was that by which all Christians 
 were called in some sense priests and Levites, and even ' high-priests ' (Origen). 
 But they were not so called, either by Origen or Irenaeus, in any sense which sug- 
 gests tninisterial powers. The point of comparison lies in nearness to God and 
 constant service (Origen), or in a certain sort of freedom and privilege (Irenaeus). 
 There is an admirable passage in Mason's Relation of Baptism to Confirmation 
 (Longman 1891) on the common Christian priesthood in its relation to holy orders, 
 pp. 262-3 > ar "d there are in this work frequent examples of its recognition by the 
 Fathers, especially as the result of confirmation (chrism) pp. ii, 148, 160, 201, etc.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 83 
 
 ' From that day and that hour in which thou earnest out of the 
 font thou art become to thyself a continual fountain, a daily remission. 
 Thou hast no need of a teacher, or of a priest's right hand. As soon 
 as thou ascendedst from the sacred font thou wast clothed in a white 
 robe and anointed with the mystic ointment ; the invocation was made 
 over thee, and the threefold power came upon thee, which filled the 
 new vessel that thou wert with this new teaching. Thenceforth it 
 made thee a judge and arbiter to thyself; it gave thee knowledge to 
 be able of thyself to learn good and evil to discern, that is, between 
 merit and sin. And because thou couldest not, whilst in the prison of 
 the body, remain free from sin, it placed thy remedy after baptism in 
 thyself, it placed remission in thine own judgment, that thou shouldest 
 not, when need should be urgent, 1 seek a priest, but thyself, as a cunning 
 and clear-sighted master, correct thine error within thee and wash away 
 thy sin by penitence ; and so hardness might cease, despair be over, 
 apathy be at an end. The fountain never fails, the water is within, 
 the washing is in thine own judgment ; sanctification is in skilfulness, 
 remission in the dew of tears.' 2 
 
 Such language sounds unsacerdotal, but it comes 
 out of the sacerdotal Church of the West in the sixth 
 century, as it would seem. It could have been used 
 in any age previous to the time when confession was 
 made compulsory. But the writer of these words 
 would not have dreamt of admitting that this freedom 
 of the Gospel belonged to a man, except as a 
 member of the Church, baptized and anointed and 
 a communicant, and therefore dependent on the 
 ministry of her clergy. 
 
 Thus the -principle of the ministry must not be 
 assailed either on the ground that it ' interposes a 
 
 1 That is, probably, 'when sin required a remedy." 
 
 2 S. Laurentii How. i. de Poenit. Bibl. Max. Vet. Pair. ix. p. 466 h. This 
 and the following sermon of Laurentius (probably of Novera, c. A.D. 507 ; see Diet. 
 Chr. Biog., s. v. LAURENTIUS (15) surnamed Mellifluus) are full of the thought of 
 various activities of the will as opening the way of restoration from sin and making 
 despair foolish : ' Homo, noli diffidere : res in promptu est, vita in nianu est : virtus 
 in voluntate est : victoria in arbitrio est : si voluisti, vicisti ' (I.e. pp. 468-9). The 
 activity emphasized is sometimes penitence and tears ; sometimes almsgiving, ' aqua 
 et ablutio et' remissio in eleemosyna largientis est' (ib.); sometimes fasting 
 (P- 474 g)-
 
 84 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 sacerdotal caste between the soul and God,' or on 
 the ground that it connives at the spiritual indolence 
 of men, by offering them official substitutes to do 
 their religion at second hand. 1 
 
 The true The ministerial principle, then the sacerdotalism 
 
 dttaiism. which cannot be disparaged or repudiated means 
 just this : that Christianity is the life of an organized 
 society in which a graduated body of ordained 
 ministers is made the instrument of unity. The 
 religious life, so far as it concerns the relations of 
 man to God, has two aspects. It is first an approach 
 of man to God. And in this relation each Christian has 
 in his own personal life a perfect freedom of access. 
 But he has this because he belongs to the one body, 
 and this one body has its central act of approach to 
 God in the great memorial oblation of the Death of 
 Christ. Here it approaches in due and consecrated 
 order; all are offerers, but they offer through one who is 
 empowered to this high charge, to ' offer the gifts ' for 
 God's acceptance and the consecration of His Spirit. 
 In the second place, religion is a gift of God to man 
 a gift of Himself. What man receives in Christ is 
 the very life of God. Here again, each Christian 
 
 1 A word must be said to vindicate the true sacerdotalism from interfering with the 
 unique Priesthood or High-Priesthood of Christ. Surely the representatives of a 
 king do not interfere with his monarchy, and a Christian minister is in a relation to 
 Christ infinitely more dependent than that of any representative of an absent king to 
 him who sends him. If we were consistent, such a notion of the 'jealousy ' of Christ 
 as militates against a ministerial priesthood would make us 'fifth-monarchy men,' 
 because kings as much interfere with his unique Kingship as ministers do with His 
 Ministry. Nor is it very consistent to accuse the ministerial priesthood at once of 
 interfering with the incommunicable Priesthood of Christ and also with the Priest- 
 hood which he has communicated to all His members. The Church indeed must 
 have a priesthood, not although Christ has one, but because He has. What He is, 
 the Church is in Him. All He is in His Human Nature, the Church is ; in Him 
 the Church has a priesthood therefore, because Christ is Highpriest. The only 
 question is as to the distribution of functions in the Church, and whether Christ has 
 willed to delegate a special sort of authority to a special class of men to be exercised 
 in his name for the good of the whole body and this is a question of evidence, 
 with which we are not yet dealing.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 85 
 
 receives the gift as an endowment of his own personal 
 life ; his whole life may become a life of grace, a life 
 of drinking in the Divine Spirit, of eating the Flesh 
 of Christ, and drinking His Blood. But the indi- 
 vidual life can receive this fellowship with God only 
 through membership in the one body and by de- 
 pendence upon social sacraments of regeneration, 
 of confirmation, of communion, of absolution of 
 which ordained ministers are the appointed instru- 
 ments. A fundamental principle of Christianity is 
 that of social dependence. 
 
 In all departments of life we are dependent one 
 on another. There is a priesthood of science minis- 
 tering the mysteries of nature, exercising a very real 
 authority and claiming, very justly, a large measure 
 of deference. There is a priesthood of art, minister- 
 ing and interpreting to men that beauty which is one 
 of the modes of God's revelation of Himself in 
 material forms. There is a priesthood of political 
 influence, and that not exercised at will, but organized 
 and made authoritative in offices of state. 1 There 
 is a natural priesthood of spiritual influence belong- 
 ing (whether they will it or not) to men of spiritual 
 power. It is to this natural priesthood that God 
 offers the support of a visible authoritative com- 
 mission in sacred things ' to feed His sheep.' The 
 Christian ministry is at once, under normal circum- 
 stances, God's provision to strengthen the hands of 
 the spiritual men, the natural guides of souls, by 
 
 1 ' If it be granted, as it well may be, that proper qualifications are a hundredfold 
 more requisite for the Christian ministry than for any other office, this would not 
 remove nor lessen the obligation not to dispense with a divine commission, supposing 
 it to have been granted and still attainable, any more than the highest legal know- 
 ledge or perfect integrity of character would dispense with the necessity of a com- 
 mission from the source of temporal power to render the decisions of a magistrate of 
 state binding and effectual ' (Denton Grace of the Ministry p. 23).
 
 86 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 giving them the support which comes of the con- 
 sciousness of an irreversible and authoritative com- 
 mission : and it is also God's provision for days 
 when prophets are few or wanting, that even then 
 there may be the bread of life ministered to hunger- 
 ing souls, and at least the simple proclamation of 
 the revealed truth, so that even then ' men's eyes 
 may see their teachers.' 
 
 ( 2 ) Unspirit- (2) But it will be said : Such a doctrine would be 
 
 c^n^t' credible enough if the priests of the Gospel had 
 
 primal been, or were at present, in the main men of spiritual 
 
 power, or even universally good men. But how is 
 
 it conceivable that men of evil or utterly unspiritual 
 
 lives, such as too many of the clergy have been, can 
 
 be God's instruments to impart his spiritual gifts to 
 
 others? Surely spiritual gifts must come from 
 
 spiritual persons. 
 
 BuMveare Church history records how strongly this objec- 
 distinguish tion has often appealed to men, but it is one which 
 
 between r r ' 
 
 character rather admits of being strongly felt than consistently 
 
 and office. f p 
 
 argued. It would have of course much more force if 
 it were possible reasonably to deny that, on the whole, 
 in Christian history spiritual office and spiritual char- 
 acter have tended to converge ; that, on the whole, the 
 ministry has been a spiritualizing force in society. 
 As it is, it may be briefly met with a threefold 
 answer. First, we reply, with Pope Stephen and 
 St. Augustin of old, 1 that ' the unworthiness of the 
 ministers hinders not the grace of the sacrament,' 
 because the Holy Spirit, and not they, is the giver of 
 
 1 See Diet. Chr. Biog. s.v. CYPRIAN i. p. 752. Of course the force of this argu- 
 ment depends on the recognition that there are such things as sacramental channels 
 of grace. The personal defects of the minister gain a wholly new importance in 
 religious bodies where sacraments, creeds, and liturgies are unrecognised, i.e. where 
 all his usefulness depends on his personal character and capacities.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 87 
 
 the grace ; they neither ' give it being nor add force 
 to it.' For according to the truest view of the 
 sacraments the ' grace ' conveyed in them represents 
 the personal action of the Holy Spirit, who on each 
 occasion when the sacrament is duly administered 
 acts afresh, according to the divine promise, from the 
 centre of His own personality. St. Ambrose accord- 
 ingly 1 deprecates the idea of priests being spoken 
 of as having power over the divine gifts which they 
 minister. Secondly and so far as the argument 
 relates to the intention of Christ in founding His 
 Church we reply that He clearly recognised that 
 moral unworthiness does not interfere with official 
 authority. The Scribes and Pharisees who sat in 
 Moses' seat who held, that is, the succession from 
 Moses were to be obeyed, even where they were 
 least to be imitated ; 2 and all ' the twelve ' had 
 equally the authority and powers of the apostolate, 
 though ' one of them was a devil.' 3 Thirdly, we 
 reply that the possibility of ministers unworthy of 
 their office is involved in the very idea of a visible 
 society in which good and bad are to be mixed 
 together. There is really no more difficulty in 
 believing that bad men can share the functions of 
 the ministerial priesthood than that bad men share 
 the priesthood which belongs to all Christians and 
 which differs from the other, as has been said, not in 
 kind but in application and degree. Yet the whole 
 method of appeal used by the apostolic writers to 
 unworthy Christians, is to address them not as men 
 who lack the prerogatives and spiritual powers of 
 
 1 See Ambrose De S. S. prol. 18 : ' Nostra enim servitia, seel tua sunt sacramenta. 
 Neque enim humanae opis est flivina conferre.' Cf. Paschasius Radbert </e corp. et 
 sang. Dom. xii. 3 and Lux Mundi (Murray 1895), p. 244. 
 
 2 St. Matt, xxiii. 2-3. 3 St. John vi. 70.
 
 88 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 the Christian life, but as men who do not 'walk 
 worthily of the vocation with which they were 
 called.' There is really again no more difficulty 
 in recognising in a bad priest a steward of divine 
 mysteries than in a bad magistrate a steward of 
 divine justice, a ' minister of God for good.' 1 ' There 
 is this difference,' says an old writer, 2 'betwixt the 
 ecclesiastical ministers or magistrates and ministers 
 or magistrates of state ; if these offend, the whole 
 world can distinguish between their persons and 
 their functions ; no disparagement falleth upon any 
 but the offenders. But if ecclesiastical persons 
 become obnoxious, then they confound their persons 
 and their functions, and transfer the shame of the 
 faults of some even upon all, yea upon the whole 
 order itself 
 
 ( 3 ) 'it is (3) Now we approach another objection: The 
 
 apostolical succession is associated with bygone ideas 
 
 of liberty/* of authority, with the divine right of kings, and a 
 state of society which is gone for ever ; it is incom- 
 patible with the true ideal of liberty. 
 
 But the It i s astonishing how frequently, and from what 
 
 StTo b<r opposite quarters, we meet with the identification of 
 
 identified Christianity with that phase of Christianity which is 
 
 abstimum, characteristic of the Middle Ages. At that period 
 
 we become witnesses of a process which is at least of 
 
 absorbing interest. The untamed, undisciplined races 
 
 which formed the material of modern nations are 
 
 subjected to the yoke of the Church (mostly at the 
 
 will of kings or chiefs), as to an external law which 
 
 is to train, mould, restrain them. The one need of 
 
 such an age is authority, discipline, rule. The Church 
 
 1 Rom. xiii. 3-6. 
 
 2 Isidore of Pelusium Epist. ii. 52 (paraphrased by Hickes Dignity of Episc. 
 Ordtr in his Treatises [Oxon. 1847] ii. p. 288).
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 89 
 
 becomes largely a 'schoolmaster to bring men to 
 Christ ' a law preparing for a Gospel. She has, 
 under these circumstances, to do with children in 
 mind. The one faculty which is in full exercise is 
 faith, in the form of a great readiness to accept 
 revelations of the supernatural world and to respect 
 their ministers the sort of faith which wants nothing 
 but dogmatic clearness and a sufficiently firm voice 
 of authority. 1 Christianity thus becomes, by a one- 
 sided development, a great imperial and hierarchical 
 system. 
 
 Such a state of things is not permanent. Men's 
 faculties develop into free exercise, and constitute 
 their separate departments according to an inevitable 
 law, as knowledge grows and life becomes more 
 complex. Other natural ' priesthoods ' arise in art, 
 in science, in medicine, and politics, in trade, in law 
 and become the successful rivals, in their own 
 spheres, of the spiritual hierarchy. The Church, to 
 all appearance, suffers loss, though in regions which 
 were not properly her own at all, at least in such 
 sense as to justify her in dictating terms to the 
 pioneers in each on their own subject-matter. Thus 
 the area in which religious authority speaks and faith 
 accepts becomes limited. More than this : authority 
 itself tends to change its character ; it ceases to be 
 absolute in religion no less than in politics ; and this 
 change affects the Church, not only as a dogmatic 
 authority, but as a government. It affects her hier- 
 archical system. Mere imperialism will no longer 
 suffice, at least for the most vigorous or intelligent 
 
 1 The saintly writers, like St. Bernard, who lived in these vaunted 'ages of faith,' 
 do not suggest a too favourable view of them. They help us to see that an un- 
 spiritual credulity, such as characterized those times, is no nearer Christian faith, in 
 its full sense, than a good deal of modern scepticism.
 
 9O Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 races, in the Church, any more than in the State. 
 Democracy, the representative system, is in the air 
 as much as free inquiry and has to be reckoned 
 with. 
 and true But in politics this transition does not mean a 
 
 liberty is ' ' 
 
 opposed to repudiation of the principle of authority. ' What 
 
 absolutism * tit- / I-IT 
 
 not to the world thirsts for at present, said Joseph Mazzmi, 
 
 authority , J . r 
 
 who was surely no friend to despotism, ' is authority. * 
 What has come about is a change in the conditions 
 of authority, in the character which it must assume. 
 This holds true in the Church also ; there, too, 
 authority must cease to be absolutism and faith 
 mere acceptance. Authority, however, is not less 
 real because it is limited, or faith less zealous be- 
 cause it is rational and inquiring. 2 But then it is 
 said : ' You are really abandoning the principle ; you 
 are only trying to cloak your surrender by keeping a 
 name, emptied of its power. The authority of a 
 Church or hierarchy really ceases when it cannot 
 dictate its own terms, when it has to submit to 
 criticism.' To this objection there seems to be a 
 complete answer, and one which needs to be forced 
 on the consideration of men. Christianity did not 
 come into existence in the West or just in time for 
 the Middle Ages. Christianity spread in a Greek 
 world in a society of the most developed sort, 
 
 1 See his Thoughts upon Democracy in Europe, cf. ' On the Duties of Man,' chap. 
 viii : ' Liberty is not the negation of all authority : it is the negation of every autho- 
 rity which fails to represent the Collective Aim of the nation.' 
 
 2 ' Is a limited, conditional government in the State such a wise, excellent, and 
 glorious constitution? And is the same authority in the Church such absurdity, 
 nonsense, and nothing at all, as to any actual power ? If there be such a thing as 
 obedience upon rational motives, there must be such a thing as authority that is not 
 absolute, or that does not require a blind, implicit obedience. Indeed, rational 
 creatures can obey no other authority ; they must have reasons for what they do. 
 And yet because the Church claims only this rational obedience, your Lordship 
 explodes such authority as none at all ' (Law's First Letter pp. 67-8).
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 91 
 
 containing all the elements of intellectual develop- 
 ment in free activity. If we want to know the 
 original character of Christian authority and Chris- 
 tian faith, we should study Greek church life from 
 St. Paul to the fifth century, or, at any rate, early 
 church life before Western Christianity took the 
 peculiar colour of Romanism. 
 
 We are concerned here, however, not with Chris- Government 
 
 ... i i * / i' n tne ear 'y 
 
 tianity as a dogma, but with the social life and church was 
 
 _,, 1.1 representa- 
 
 government of the Church. In this department tive. 
 then, when we look back to the life of the early 
 Christian communities, what a beautiful picture of 
 freedom, of representative institutions, of the corre- 
 lation of rights and duties, we find for our contem- 
 plation. The sacred ministry receives indeed its 
 authority from above and acts in God's name, as 
 God's representative ; but the man who is to minister 
 is the elect of the people, and is their representative 
 also. Thus the Apostles ordained the first deacons, 
 but the Church elected them. ' Look ye out, 
 brethren, from among you seven men of good report, 
 whom we may appoint over this business.' So spoke 
 the Apostles to the first Christians. 'And the 
 saying pleased the whole multitude : and they chose 
 seven men : whom they set before the Apostles : and 
 when they had prayed, they laid their hands upon 
 them.' So in the subapostolic age Clement speaks 
 of the presbyter-bishops as ordained from above, 1 
 but with the consent of the whole Church, and in such 
 a way as to suggest that, under certain circumstances, 
 they were not exempt from the judgment of the 
 Church. Other documents of the first age speak in 
 the same way of the election of bishops by the com- 
 
 1 Clem, ad Cor. 40 and 44. More will be said on this.
 
 92 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 munity. 1 Nor does this method of popular election, 
 or control over election, appear only in the dim 
 shadow of the subapostolic age : counteracted at all 
 times by other influences, 2 it yet lasted on as the 
 ideal of the Church for centuries. The emperor 
 Alexander Severus ' was fond of praising the careful 
 way in which the Church posted the names of all 
 whom she destined for the priesthood, so that any, 
 who knew evil of them, might object.' 3 He would 
 have it made a model in the appointment of provincial 
 governors. We know, again, that the bishop to be 
 elected over any Church was to be thoroughly known 
 in the Church one who had passed through the 
 inferior grades of the ministry. ' That custom is to 
 be diligently observed,' says Cyprian, ' as of divine 
 tradition and apostolic observance, which is main- 
 tained amongst us also and almost over all provinces, 
 that, with a view to the due celebration of ordina- 
 tions, the neighbouring bishops of the same province 
 should come together to the community for which a 
 ruler is to be ordained, and the bishop should be 
 chosen in the presence of the people who have com- 
 plete knowledge of each man's life and conduct by 
 his conversation among them.' 4 This popular check 
 on ordinations he requires no less for the presbyterate 
 and the diaconate. So, again, it is regarded by Pope 
 
 1 Didache xv. t : \(ipoTovri<ra.Te oJiv favrols eiritrKoirovs icai SiaKoyovs. Cf. also the 
 very ancient Egypt. Ch. Ordinances 16 : 'If there be a paucity of men, and in any 
 place there be a number less than twelve of those who can vote for a bishop,' and 
 Canones Hippolyti ii. (Texte w. Untersuch. Bd. vi. p. 39). 
 
 2 As in the first period by prophetic nomination ; see Clem. Alex. Quis Dives 42 : 
 ' St. John would go about here to appoint bishops, . . . there to ordain to the clergy 
 some one of those pointed out by the Spirit.' 
 
 3 Mason Diocletian Persecution pp. 84, and 85 n.l 'dicebatque grave esse, cum 
 id Christian! et ludaei facerent in praedicandis sacerdotibus qui ordinandi sunt, non 
 fieri in provinciarum rectoribus quibus et fortunae hominum committerentur et 
 capita' (Ael. Lampr. Alex. xlv. 7). 
 
 * Ep. Ixvii. 5 ; see Bingham Ant. ii. 10. 2.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 93 
 
 Julius as monstrous that ' Gregory, a stranger to the 
 city, who had not been baptized there and was not 
 known to the community in general and had not 
 been asked for by presbyters or bishops or people,' 
 should be obtruded on the Church of Alexandria, 
 'whereas the ordination of a bishop ought not to 
 have taken place thus lawlessly and contrary to the 
 ecclesiastical canon, but he should have been ordained 
 in the Church itself (over which he is to rule), out of 
 the priesthood, out of the actual body of the clergy, 
 and not, as now, in violation of the canons which 
 come from the Apostles.' x Priscillian the Spaniard, 
 again, gives us, as the sentiment of the bishops con- 
 temporary with him in Spain about A.D. 380, the 
 view that, 'as a bishop's consecration lies with the 
 bishop, so the choice of whom to ask for lies with 
 the people.' 2 Once more Leo the Great, ' the founder 
 of the papacy,' writes : ' He who is to preside over all 
 must be elected by all.' ' Before a consecration must 
 go the suffrages of the citizens, the approbation of 
 the people, the judgment of persons of distinction, 
 the choice of the clergy that the rule of apostolic 
 authority may be in all respects observed, which en- 
 joins that a priest to govern the Church should be 
 supported not only by the approval of the faithful, 
 but also by the testimony of those without.' ' No 
 metropolitan should we allow to ordain a priest 
 (bishop) on his own judgment without the consent 
 of clergy and people : the consent of the whole com- 
 munity must elect the president of the Church ' : 
 only where division makes unanimity impossible the 
 
 1 ap. A than. Apol. c. Ar. 30. 
 
 2 Priscillian, Tract, ii. p. 40 (ed. Schepss in the Vienna Corpus Script. Eccl. 
 Lot.) : ' sicut dedicationem sacerdotis in sacerdote, sic electionem consistere petition!.-, 
 [in] plebe.'
 
 94 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 metropolitan may decide the election in favour of 
 the man who has the best support. ' No reason can 
 tolerate that persons should be held to be bishops ' 
 (so he says on another occasion to the African clergy) 
 ' who were neither chosen by the clergy, nor demanded 
 by the laity, nor ordained by the provincial bishops 
 with the consent of the metropolitan.' 1 Quota- 
 tions to this effect might be greatly multiplied, 
 and from later sources. The Latin rites of ordina- 
 tion are framed in recognition of this represen- 
 tative system. 2 This then was undoubtedly the 
 ideal of the bishop's election in the early Church. 3 
 The bishop was to be really the persona of the 
 Church he ruled. 
 
 This, moreover, he was enabled to be in some 
 real sense in virtue of the very small community 
 over which he presided. Through the greater part 
 at least of the Roman empire each town-community 
 had its bishop, and the country-bishop supplemented 
 his authority in the surrounding district, first in the 
 East and later in the West. The bishop of Rome 
 was in an extraordinary position in the middle of 
 the third century, because he had under him as many 
 as forty-six presbyters, seven deacons, and seven sub- 
 deacons, besides those of minor orders. 4 Ordinarily 
 the numbers would have been very much smaller. 
 Thus the bishop, according to the early ideal, was 
 by no means the great prelate ; he was the pastor of 
 
 1 Leo Epp. x. 4-6 ; xiii. 3 ; xiv. 5 ; clxvii. i. 
 
 2 See App. Note C. Cf. also R. B. Rackham in Essays on Church Reform (Murray 
 1898) pp. 72 ff. 
 
 3 On the extent and limits of its observance see Bingham Ant. ii. 10. 3-7 ; also 
 Diet. Chr. Ant. s. v. BISHOP. Mr. Haddan, the author, remarks how vaguely the 
 words suffragium testimonium indicium consensus are used (i. p. 214). 
 Vague unformulated rights are more easily overridden. 
 
 4 Euseb. H.E. vi. 43.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 95 
 
 a flock, like the vicar of a modern town, in intimate 
 relations with all his people. 1 
 
 Nor was he in theory absolute even within the and not 
 
 absolute. 
 
 limits of his 'parish' or diocese. For, in the first 
 place, he was himself subject to the laws which he 
 administered. When St. Chrysostom is referring to 
 the custom of holding the Gospel over the head of 
 the bishop who is being ordained, he says that it is 
 to remind him that ' if he is the head of all, yet he 
 acts under these laws (of the Gospel), ruling all and 
 ruled by the law, ordering all and himself ordered ' : 
 it is a symbol of the fact that he is ' under authority.' 2 
 At first indeed this authority had no visible sanction ; 
 St. Cyprian claims repeatedly for the bishop that he 
 is ' responsible to none but God.' Later it came to 
 be embodied in provincial and ecumenical councils. 
 Secondly, within his own diocese he shared his rule 
 with others. No doubt his power was not subject 
 to formal limitations ; but round him there was the 
 council of his presbyters, ' the Church's senate ' ; 3 
 and St. Cyprian tells us that he made it a fixed rule 
 from his consecration 'to do nothing on his own 
 private judgment, but everything with the counsel 
 of his clergy and the consent of his laity.' 4 The 
 whole conception indeed of the diocesan synod was 
 the basis of a great representative system which 
 culminated at last in the ecumenical council. 5 Thus 
 the ideal of church government in early days was 
 not at all absolute. If the guilds of the Roman 
 
 1 The facts are well known: see Bingham Ant. ii. 12, Hatch B.L. lect. viii. 
 The principle is exemplified in the Apost. Ch. Ordinances 16. 
 
 2 Bingham Ant. ii. n. 8. 3 Bingham Ant. ii. 19. 7. 
 
 4 Ep. xiv. 4. See other references in Bingham Ant. ii. 19. 7, 8. 
 
 5 Cf. art. CYPRIAN in Diet. Chr. Biog. \. p. 753 : ' the assembly representative : 
 each bishop the elect of his flock.'
 
 Th^change 
 
 g6 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 empire represented, as they did, the elements of free 
 life and spontaneous movement through all the classes 
 of non-Christian society down to the lowest, the 
 principle of liberty and spontaneity was at least as 
 prominent and real in the supernatural society of the 
 Church. It was by no means necessarily an impe- 
 rialist institution, though its officers were of divine 
 authority and apostolic descent. 
 
 Q ass j m ii a t e the Church to the empire in 
 ideas and methods no less than in gradation of 
 dignities. In the West the essentially imperialist 
 temper of Rome moulded the institutions of Christen- 
 dom, and gave them a new direction and new charac- 
 teristics. Thus in the fifth century Socrates remarks 
 that ' the episcopate of the Romans, like that of the 
 Alexandrians, had already for some time advanced 
 beyond the limits proper to the priesthood to the 
 point of despotism.' 1 So it was that episcopacy 
 passed into a new phase. The authority of kings 
 and popes overwhelmed the democratic elements in 
 the Christian polity. If they survived, they survived 
 rather as names and forms than as realities. But 
 names and forms still bear witness beyond their 
 present power to a principle which is not dead. 
 
 Thus the mediaeval and modern prelate, Anglican 
 or Roman, is not the only, or the original, type of 
 bishop. He differs a good deal from the bishop of 
 the earliest period not indeed in fundamental, 
 spiritual principle, but in outward appearance and 
 rank. 2 We need not necessarily deplore the change. 
 
 1 ire'pa TTJS itptixrvvrii e?rl &vva.<rreiav ffSri TraAai TrpoeAflouorjs {H.E. vii. n). He is 
 speaking of Celestine suppressing the Novatian body in Rome. Cf. vii. 7. 
 
 2 Dr. Hatch describes the change in B.L. lect. viii and Growth of Ch. Instil. 
 See also Rosmini Five Wounds of the Holy Church ch. v.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 97 
 
 The age of barbarism and the age of feudalism had 
 each its own needs, and the Church adapted herself 
 to them. But there is a protest, based on the facts 
 of church history, which it is essential to make : it 
 is against all language such as would imply that 
 Christianity had no history before it became domi- 
 nated by imperialism and embedded in feudalism. 
 The catholic principle is not Romanism merely or 
 Byzantinism, nor is it identified with the Anglican 
 episcopate of monarchical and aristocratic days. It 
 has its roots deeper down in human nature than any 
 of these. If, then, the imperialism which coloured not 
 church theology and church organization is becoming ^' 
 a thing of the past, there is nothing in church prin- 
 ciples to prevent our saying : Let it die. ' The 
 powers that be' the actually existing authorities 
 of the new age ' are ordained of God.' Meanwhile 
 let us disentangle the essential and permanent creed, 
 the essential and permanent organization, from the 
 passing phase of civilization in which it has become 
 embedded ; let us make clear what church principles 
 essentially are. We shall not be afraid of the 
 ( democratic ' temper within the Church, so far as it 
 is a return upon the Church's earliest spirit or an 
 application of it. There is however one essential 
 principle of all politics, secular and spiritual, which 
 must be kept steadily in view : ' political rights are 
 only the correlative of political duties done.' This 
 is always the church principle. Whatever rights the 
 Christian layman should have, it must be as a 
 Christian layman, i.e. as subject himself to the divine 
 authority of the Gospel and to the Church, the 
 common mother of clergy and of laity. For it is 
 only as subject to discipline that we can take any 
 
 G
 
 98 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 part in the exercise of it, and the lesson which 
 Chrysostom finds in the ceremony of episcopal con- 
 secration applies to the layman in his degree, at 
 least as much as to the bishop in his : ' the layman is 
 bound by the layman's ordinances.' 
 ( 4 ) -it can- (4) It has been contended by Lord Macaulay 
 
 not have . , * 
 
 been and the contention was not a new one that, how- 
 
 unbroken. 1 ever much the Church may have insisted on apostolic 
 succession, as a matter of fact the chances are over- 
 whelming against its having been preserved. ' Whether 
 a given clergyman be really a successor of the 
 Apostles depends on an immense number of such 
 contingencies as these ; whether, under King Ethel- 
 wolf, a stupid priest might not, while baptizing 
 several scores of Danish prisoners who had just 
 made their option between the font and the gallows, 
 inadvertently omit to perform the rite on one of 
 these graceless proselytes ; whether, in the seventh 
 century, an impostor, who had never received con- 
 secration, might not have passed himself ofT as a 
 bishop on a rude tribe of Scots ; whether a lad of 
 twelve did really, by a ceremony huddled over when 
 he was too drunk to know what he was about, 
 convey the episcopal character to a lad of 
 ten.' 1 
 
 Thisobjec- Such an argument has nothing to recommend it 
 noThohT; except the vigour of Lord Macaulay 's style. Indeed, 
 if we take it on its own level, its force is gone when 
 once it is borne in mind that failures of baptism do 
 not enter into the question of the permanent succes- 
 sion, except where the person whose baptism was 
 omitted or irregular subsequently became a bishop ; 
 
 1 Essay on Gladstone on Church and State. Chillingworth cannot be quoted in 
 this sense, because in his argument (Relig. of Prof. ch. ii. 67) he is taking into 
 account that ' very dungeon of uncertainty,' the Romanist doctrine of intention.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 99 
 
 and that invalidating irregularities in episcopal ordina- 
 tions, when they exist, would not have the effect 
 which the objection supposes, because succession 
 comes of interlacing lines, each bishop having as a 
 rule been consecrated by three of his order. 1 In 
 fact it has been mathematically argued that, even if 
 we make the absurd supposition of one consecrator 
 in twenty at any particular moment in history having 
 been, through some accident, himself not validly 
 consecrated, the chances will be 8000 : I against all 
 three consecrators in any given case being in a like 
 position, and the chances against a bishop consecrated 
 under such circumstances, who would thus be no 
 bishop, being combined with coadjutors similarly 
 incapacitated to continue the succession, are 'as 
 5 1 2,000,000,000 to unity.' 2 
 
 But a much better answer to such a suggested and we are 
 
 . . . r . responsible 
 
 difficulty lies in the consideration that, if we have f r n mre 
 
 i i i /--it 11 than obe- 
 
 reason to believe that Christ intended to institute a 
 self-perpetuating ministry in His Church, He makes 
 Himself responsible for its possibility, and His power 
 is not limited by such material conditions. * Leaving, 
 then, all hidden things to Him to whose sole cogni- 
 zance they belong, we may securely depend on His 
 goodness and justice, that so long as His sacred 
 appointments are maintained, as far as lies in our 
 
 1 The three consecrators were required originally not to secure validity (in case 
 one of the bishops was, by some accidental omission of a necessary rite, no real 
 bishop at all), but as a guarantee of general provincial recognition. The other con- 
 sideration is perhaps too materialistic to have entered into the mind of the early 
 Church. When things were duly done according to Christ's ordinance, they were 
 regarded as certainly having His certificate. But when validity came to be conceived 
 under more materialistic conditions at a later period of theology, it was natural to 
 suppose that each bishop who joined in the act of consecration gave additional 
 security that it was valid. They were cooperatores and not merely testes. The 
 point is, however, discussed : see Estcourt Question of Angl. Ord. pp. 110-114. I 
 do not pursue the question, because I do not lay stress on the argument in the text. 
 
 - Gladstone Ch. Princ. pp. 235, 236.
 
 roo Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 power, we shall never suffer through any secret 
 blemish or incapacity of His ministers.' x 
 
 ( 5 ) ' it would (5) ' But,' it will be exclaimed, ' however reasonable 
 non-epTsco- the idea of B. ministerial succession may be however 
 adaptable in principle to new conditions of society 
 and thought in fact it has become so unreasonable 
 and so stereotyped, so fatally conservative of what 
 was shown to be false and corrupt, at epochs of past 
 history that great Christian nations, or great bodies 
 of Christian men, have broken away from its organi- 
 zation. Are these, then, which have no succession, 
 or a succession which you declare invalid, to be 
 "unchurched" to be declared outside the pale of 
 the covenant and left in unrecognised isolation?' 
 This question is always being asked in tones of 
 passionate appeal or indignant remonstrance. As 
 we shall have occasion to recur to the problem the 
 Preliminary less need be said here. Suppose, however, an im- 
 partial investigation to convince us that a ministerial 
 succession was really part of Christ's intention and 
 belongs only to the episcopal Churches in a legitimate 
 sense, it will surely be our duty to maintain it and 
 be faithful to it. Nor, if we are at all familiar with 
 the disappointing side of church history, shall we be 
 greatly surprised that its corruptions have bred revolt. 
 These corruptions are, no doubt, so many apologies 
 for the revolters. It is conceivable that they may 
 reach the point of excusing revolt in particular cases 
 and throwing the blame of it on the representatives 
 of authority. If that were so, or so far as it was 
 so, we shall abstain from condemning individuals or 
 races, but we shall not abandon principles. Men are 
 dealt with according to their opportunities ; and as 
 God's love is not limited by His covenant, so He can 
 
 1 Archbp. Potter : quoted by Denton Grace of the Ministry p. 258.
 
 II.] Apostolic Succession. 101 
 
 work through ministrations which are not ' valid ' 
 that is, ministrations which have not the security of 
 the covenant. But though God can do this, we have 
 no right to claim it of Him. If He is not bound to 
 His sacraments, we men, up to the limits of our know- 
 ledge, 1 certainly are. However excusable many may 
 be in ignorance of divine institutions, we shall not be 
 excusable if we are faithless to them for fear of hurting 
 other men's feelings or disturbing existing arrange- 
 ments. Such conduct would be most false charity, 
 most real treachery. Bishop Butler 2 reminds us ' how 
 great presumption it is to make light of any institu- 
 tions of divine appointment ' ; and he emphasizes to 
 us 'the moral obligation, in the strictest and most 
 proper sense,' which attaches to any command 'merely 
 positive, admitted to be from God.' And if anything 
 could increase this obligation, it would be the sense 
 that we are living through an age of change. It is 
 when there is a general ' shaking ' of existing estab- 
 lishments of all that has been merely recognised 
 and customary that religiously- minded men are 
 likely to be driven back upon those institutions 
 which can give the completest guarantee of security 
 and permanence. 
 
 With this much preface, giving (it may be hoped) 
 a clearer idea of what the principle of the ministry 
 and of the apostolic succession may really be said to 
 mean, we turn to the witness of history. 
 
 1 When we speak of ' essentials ' in religion, it is of course important to recall that 
 God is a father and equitable, and that His action is not tied to His covenanted 
 channels. There is a useful distinction drawn hy Roman Catholic theologians between 
 things necessary to salvation necessitate medii, i.e. absolutely and in all cases, 
 and things necessary necessitate praecepti, i.e. obligatory upon all who are 
 within the hearing of a divine ordinance. Only the right disposition of will is (we may 
 say) essential in the first sense. This may exist under all conditions of ignorance. 
 All else is necessary in proportion as we come under the responsibilities of nearness 
 to God's revelation of Himself (cf. Newman's Parochial Sermons vol. vi. pp. 170, 
 171' Faith the Title for Justification '). a Analogy part 11. ch. i.
 
 CHAPTER III 
 
 THE WITNESS OF CHURCH HISTORY 
 The ministry T H E conception of the Christian ministry described 
 
 in church 
 
 history [ n the last chapter is confessedly no mere ideal. It 
 represents what has been, beyond a doubt, a fact of 
 primary importance in the Christianity of history. 
 
 In many respects, indeed, if we were to trace back 
 the genealogy of the ministry in the Church, we should 
 find that it has passed through strange vicissitudes, 
 and from time to time has wonderfully changed its 
 appearance. It may be well to call attention to 
 this at once, so that variations of aspect, which are 
 even startling, may serve to make more emphatic 
 the principles and facts which have been throughout 
 permanent and unchanging. 1 
 
 in spite of For example, the episcopate of the first period, 
 features when, speaking generally, every town Church had 
 its independent episcopal organization and country 
 bishops arose to superintend the scattered flocks of 
 the rural districts, was a very different thing from the 
 episcopate of the mediaeval epoch, when the great 
 dioceses of Teutonic Europe were formed, when 
 bishops became great feudal lords, and the feudal 
 character at times almost superseded the spiritual. 
 Very different again was the organization of the Celtic 
 
 1 Cf. Dr. Liddon A Father in Christ p. 26 f.
 
 CHAP, ill.] The Witness of Church History. 103 
 
 Church of Ireland (and thence of Scotland), where 
 the presbyter-abbots were the real ecclesiastical rulers 
 and the succession of abbots the important succession, 
 while the episcopate, indefinitely multiplied, had its 
 place only as the necessary ' instrument of spiritual 
 generation,' or the appropriate decoration of sanctity, 
 in entire subordination to the monastic authority. 
 
 Again, there have been vast changes in the relation 
 of the bishops to secular society, and in their relation 
 to one another. There has been the slow develop- 
 ment of the metropolitan system on the lines of the 
 imperial organization ; the upgrowth of the papacy ; 
 the rise of national Churches ; the schisms of the 
 eleventh and sixteenth centuries. There have been 
 ' Erastian ' epochs, whether under the Byzantine and 
 Prankish emperors or under English kings, and 
 epochs, on the other hand, when a king 1 could com- 
 plain that 'absolutely the only persons who reign 
 are the bishops,' or when a pope could claim, as in 
 the famous bull Unam Sanctam, to have the sword 
 of secular authority committed to him as well as 
 that of ecclesiastical government. 
 
 Again, there have been days when bishops adminis- 
 tered, and submitted to, a rigorous discipline, such 
 as finds expression in the early Spanish council of 
 Elvira, and days of the collapse of discipline, such as 
 gives the tone of something like despair to the lamen- 
 tations of Basil and Gregory of Nyssa in the Arian 
 period in the East, or such as Isidore and Gregory 
 of Tours describe in the West. 
 
 There have been, once again, great changes in the 
 idea of episcopal election, as it passes out of the 
 
 1 Chilperic (Greg. Tur. H. F. vi. 46); but the context, as well as the circumstances, 
 take away from the force of this.
 
 IO4 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 primitive method which made the bishop the real 
 representative of the community in the midst of 
 which he had grown up, ' behaving himself well in 
 the inferior offices/ to become the prerogative in 
 fact, if not in name, of metropolitans, or popes, or 
 kings. 
 
 has been These have been immense changes. In part they 
 
 fhrou r ghout have been inevitable and beneficial ; in part the 
 cipiesf prm recognition of them should be a stimulus to the 
 Church to recover in idea, and so at last in fact, a 
 primitive standard which ought never to have been 
 abandoned. But all through these changes there 
 have been certain fixed principles l of supreme im- 
 portance, which have been uniformly maintained, and 
 which all the changes in outward circumstance only 
 serve to throw into stronger relief, and it is with 
 these alone that we are here concerned. These fixed 
 principles represent what the Church has continuously 
 believed with reference to the ministry, and con- 
 sistently acted upon (let us say to start with) since 
 the middle of the second century down to the period 
 of the Reformation. They may be expressed thus : 
 such as the (i) that Christ instituted in His Church, by suc- 
 
 requirement r t A i 
 
 of apostolic cession from the Apostles, a permanent ministry of 
 
 succession, . , , . .. , 
 
 etc. truth and grace, of the word and sacraments, as 
 
 an indispensable part of her organization and con- 
 tinuous corporate life : 
 
 (2) that while there are different offices in this 
 ministry, especially an episcopate, a presbyterate, and 
 a diaconate with functions and mutual relations 
 
 1 A sermon of Dean Stanley's ' The Burning Bush' (quoted in Remarks on 
 Dr. Light/oofs Essay on the Christian Ministry, by C. Wordsworth, Bishop of 
 St. Andrews, pp. 2-6) illustrates how these fixed principles can be ignored. He 
 describes, for instance, the mediaeval abbeys and the great universities as ' fragments 
 of presbyterianism imbedded in the midst of the episcopate ' (p. 4). Their relation to 
 the papacy is quite forgotten.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 105 
 
 fundamentally fixed, though containing also variable 
 elements there belongs to the order of Bishops, 1 
 and to them alone, the power to perpetuate the 
 ministry in its several grades, by the transmission 
 of the authority received from the Apostles, its 
 original depositaries ; so that, as a consequence, no 
 ministry except such as has been received by epi- 
 scopal ordination can be legitimately or validly 
 exercised in the Church : 
 
 (3) that the transmission of ministerial authority, 
 or Ordination, is an outward act, of a sacramental 
 character, in which the laying-on of hands, with 
 prayer, is ' the visible sign.' It will appear also 
 
 (4) that the Church, without change of principle, 
 and merely by the clearing-up of ideas, came to 
 reckon the effect of ordination as indelible, and to 
 recognise as a Priesthood the ministry of bishops 
 and presbyters, which it conferred. 
 
 The general recognition of these principles during 
 the period specified will hardly be matter of dispute. 
 ' In the latter part of the second century of the 
 Christian era, the subject [of the apostolic succession] 
 came into distinct and formal view ; and from that 
 
 1 I reckon the bishops as a distinct order ; see, however, on the supposed anomaly 
 of the Church of Alexandria, and what it implies, pp. 124 ff. and 302 ff. The later 
 tendency to reckon the episcopate as constituting with the presbyterate only one 
 ordo sacerdotum (Catech. Cone. Trident, ii. 7. 25) was due partly to the desire to 
 emphasize the pre-eminent dignity of the sacerdotium; partly to the desire to 
 reduce church orders to the mystical number of seven ; partly to the wide influence 
 of Jerome in the West (see below pp. 157 ff.). It has its parallel in early days when 
 the bishop was sometimes reckoned with the presbytery. But so long as bishops are 
 regarded as having special functions of their own, which presbyters cannot validly 
 perform, and are ordained with a special ordination (Catech. Cone. Trident. I.e.) 
 the exact ordering of grades is rather a matter of nomenclature. See on the varia- 
 tions Diet, Chr. Ant. ii. pp. 1474-5 s - v - ORDERS, HOLY. Morinus, however, among 
 more recent Roman theologians (A.D. 1686) says of those who reckon eight orders of 
 the ministry, major and minor, by counting the episcopate as a distinct order : 
 ' huic sententiae plurimum favent rituales omnes tarn Graeci quam Latini et universa 
 prope ecclesiae traditio ' (de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. i. 2. 26), and his authority is deservedly 
 very high.
 
 io6 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 time forward it seems to have been considered by 
 the great writers of the catholic body a fact too 
 palpable to be doubted, and too simple to be mis- 
 understood.' l The agreement, however, as to what 
 has historically been accepted in the Church on the 
 subject of the ministry is not nearly complete 
 Evidence enough to render argument unnecessary. We pro- 
 i. or the ceed then, first of all, to review the evidence for the 
 
 episcopal 
 
 successions existence of the threefold ministry, after the middle 
 
 from A. D. 150. f . * o-ii 
 
 of the second century, 2 with the accompanying 
 principle of the apostolic succession and the limita- 
 tion to bishops of the right of ordination. 
 as appealed I. The basis shall be laid in the testimony of 
 aeus. Irenaeus. Irenaeus had been born in Asia Minor 
 
 not later than A.D. 130.* He tells us that in early 
 youth he had sat at the feet of Polycarp, ' who had 
 been appointed by Apostles a bishop for Asia in the 
 Church of Smyrna' a venerable old man, whose 
 appearance and ways of life were, he assures us, 
 indelibly imprinted on his memory and that he had 
 listened to his discourses in public and private, 4 and 
 that he had also had opportunities of instruction by 
 Asiatic 'elders,' amongst whom some at least had 
 been disciples of Apostles. Thus imbued with the 
 traditions of the Asiatic Church, in which especially 
 St. John's influence was a living reality, he passed as 
 a young man, probably before Polycarp's martyrdom 
 (c. A.D. 155), from Asia to Rome. How long he 
 remained there we do not know ; but at the latest in 
 the year 177, when the persecution fell upon the 
 Churches of South Gaul and the aged bishop Pothinus 
 
 1 Gladstone Church Principles p. 189. 
 
 2 The reason for not at first going back behind about A.D. 150 will appear after- 
 wards, p. 199. 
 
 3 For this and other details of St. Irenaeus' life see Diet. Chr. Biog. iii. p. 253 f. 
 * See his epistle to Florinus in Euseb. H. E. v. 20.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 107 
 
 was one of many victims, Irenaeus was a presbyter 
 of Lyons, and he succeeded the martyr in his 
 episcopal see. Previously, however, he had visited 
 Rome, in order ' to promote the peace of the Church ' 
 by bearing communications from the Gallican con- 
 fessors to Eleutherus, the bishop, on the subject of 
 the Montanist controversy. 1 True to his name of 
 ' peaceful/ he again intervened, as has been already 
 mentioned, in the dispute between Victor of Rome 
 and the Asiatic Churches in the matter of keeping 
 Easter, to rebuke Victor for his hasty breach of 
 ecclesiastical unity on the ground of an indifferent 
 matter of custom, not of the faith. 
 
 Thus much account of the man has been given in The value of 
 order to emphasize his remarkable connection alike 
 with the apostolic traditions which lingered in that 
 last home of the apostolic band, the Churches of Asia, 
 and with the sentiments of the contemporary Churches 
 both of East and West. Irenaeus was fitted by cir- 
 cumstances, as well as by character, to be what he 
 pre-eminently claims to be, the staunch maintainer 
 of apostolic tradition. Of course the 'tradition of 
 the elders ' 2 to which he so frequently refers is not 
 infallible. 3 Elders may have made mistakes, or 
 Irenaeus' memory may have been treacherous as to 
 this or that point of their record, in spite of his 
 
 1 Euseb. H. E. v. 3, 4 : Diet. Chr. Biog. iii. p. 937 s.v. MONTANUS. It \& possible 
 that there was at this time no other episcopal see in Gaul than that of Lyons and 
 that Irenaeus was consecrated at Rome. Eusebius speaks of the irapoixiai xara 
 raAAiap as Ecp7)i/aZo5 eTreaxoTret, but cf. M. Tixeront Les origines de ffglise 
 ctEdesse (Paris, 1888) p. 14. 
 
 2 ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 20 (the epistle to Florinus). 
 
 3 He gives us, on the authority not only of Papias but also of other ' elders ' who 
 remembered St. John to have related it among our Lord's discourses, the fabulous 
 prophecy ascribed to Him of the Millennial Vines (v. 33. 3, 4). He bases also on 
 the authority of these same elders ' all the elders who had intercourse with John, 
 the disciple of the Lord, in Asia ' as recording St. John's teaching, the statement 
 that our Lord was over forty years old (ii. 22. 5).
 
 io8 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 assertion that he recalled the scenes of his youth 
 when he was in the company of Polycarp in all their 
 details with more precision than recent events. The 
 value of tradition depends very much on the exact 
 point for which it is alleged. But a mistake or 
 failure of memory, not hard to account for in details 
 of tradition, cannot invalidate his testimony in 
 matters of such primary importance as the character 
 and traditional reputation of the church ministry, 
 or, to take another example, the authority of the 
 four Gospels during the period covered by his own 
 eastern and western experience. On such matters 
 a mistake is hardly possible. 
 
 We take Irenaeus, then, for our primary witness 
 as to the apostolic succession. He is combating 
 Gnosticism in his great work Against the Heresies, 
 written probably during his episcopate ; and in view 
 of the imaginative idealism of the Gnostic teachers, he 
 rests his case in the main on the historical revelation. 
 He is therefore not so much occupied in developing 
 a Christian ' science ' over against the ' science falsely 
 so called ' of his opponents this was rather the 
 work of the Alexandrians as in emphasizing what 
 the rule of faith has been in the Churches as derived 
 from the apostolic preaching. 1 In the consent of all 
 the Churches he finds the security of the tradition. 
 The case was put by his more epigrammatic disciple 
 Tertullian in the question : ' Is it probable that so 
 many Churches of such importance should have hit 
 by an accident of error on an identical creed ? ' 2 
 There is, then, ever before Irenaeus' eye, the picture 
 
 <xAt)(W)S y TU>V awoa*r6\<av SiSa^y Kal TO apxatov rijs eKicArj<7tas 
 Kara wai/ros rov KOIT/J.OV (iv. 33. 8). 
 
 ' Ecquid verisimile est, ut tot ac tantae [ecclesiae] in unam fidem erraverint?' 
 (de Praescr. 28.)
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 109 
 
 of the universal Church, spread over all the world, His appeal 
 
 ,,. , . ,, . , ..to the 
 
 handing down in unbroken succession the apostolic episcopal 
 truth : and the bond of unity, the link to connect the 
 generations in the Church, is the episcopal succession. 
 Irenaeus' use of language, indeed, about the bishop 
 is not quite determinate ; l the venerable title of 
 ' presbyter,' the ' ancient ' or ' elder,' is still used in 
 an inclusive sense for the Church's rulers. But the 
 idea is quite determinate. He regards the bishops in 
 every Church as succeeding in an especial sense to 
 the Apostles. They represent in every place by 
 apostolic succession the catholic faith ; they have 
 the ' gift of the truth ' and the apostolic authority of 
 government ; 2 they are the guardians also no doubt 
 of the grace by which Christians live, of which as much 
 as of the truth the Church is the ' rich treasury.' 3 But 
 it is mainly as preserving the catholic traditions that 
 Irenaeus regards the apostolic succession. From this 
 point of view he makes it without hesitation one of 
 the primary essentials of Christianity. 
 
 1 That is, he calls the bishops also presbyters. See iii. 3. 2 (compared with til. a. 
 2) ; iv. 26. a, 4, 5 ; Ep. ad. Viet. ap. Euseb. H. E. \. 24. So the Anonymous 
 Presbyter who writes against Montanism (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 16) speaks of the 
 church authorities at Ancyra, bishop no doubt included, as ' the presbyters.' So (as 
 will appear) Clem. Alex., Origen, Firmilian. 
 
 2 ' Charisma veritatis certum ' (iv. 26. 2) ; ' quos et successores [apostoli] relinque- 
 bant suum ipsorum locum magisterii tradentes ' (iii. 3. i). 
 
 3 ' Depositorium dives' (iii. 4. i). Cf. iii. 24. i, where he speaks of the Church as 
 possessing ' earn quae secundum salutem hominum est solitam operationem, quae est 
 in fide nostra ; quam perceptam ab ecclesia custodimus et quae semper a Spiritu Dei, 
 quasi in vase bono eximium quoddam depositum iuvenescens et iuvenescere faciens 
 ipsum vas'_in quo est. Hoc enim ecclesiae creditum est Dei munus, quemadmodum ad 
 inspirationem plasmationi, ad hoc ut omnia membra percipientia vivificentur : et in eo 
 disposita [? deposits] est communicatio Christi, id est Spiritus sanctus, arrha incor- 
 ruptelae et confirmatio fidei nostrae et scala ascensionis ad eum. In ecclesia enim, 
 inquit, posuit Deus apostolos, prophetas, doctores et universam reliquam opera- 
 tionem Spiritus, cuius non sunt participes omnes qui non currunt ad ecclesiam. . . . 
 Ubi enim ecclesia, ibi et Spiritus Dei, et ubi Spiritus Dei, illic ecclesia et omnis 
 gratia ; Spiritus autem veritas. Quapropter qui non participant eum, neque a 
 mammillis matris nutriuntur in vitam, neque percipiunt de corpore Christi proce- 
 dentem nitidissimum fontem.' We observe here in what close and inseparable con-
 
 1 10 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 ' The true knowledge ' (so he calls the Christian religion) ' is the 
 doctrine of the Apostles, and the ancient system of the Church in all 
 the world : and the character of the body of Christ, according to the 
 successions of the bishops, to whom they [the Apostles] delivered the 
 Church in each separate place : the complete use (moreover) of the 
 Scriptures which has come down to our time, preserved without 
 corruption, receiving neither addition nor loss ; its public reading 
 without falsification ; legitimate and careful exposition according to the 
 Scriptures, without peril and without blasphemy : and the pre-eminent 
 gift of love. ' 1 Again, ' The way of those who belong to the Church 
 is encompassing the whole world, because it holds the tradition firm 
 from the Apostles, and enables us to see that the faith of all is one and 
 the same, while all teach one and the same God the Father, and 
 believe the same dispensation of the Incarnation of the Son of God, 
 and acknowledge the same gift of the Spirit, and meditate the same 
 precepts, and preserve the same form of that ordination which belongs 
 to the Church, and expect the same coming of the Lord, and await the 
 same salvation of the whole man, both soul and body.' 2 
 
 These summary statements of what constitutes 
 
 nection he puts the gifts of grace and truth. The gifts of grace he connects specially 
 with the sacraments, regeneration with baptism (v. 15. 3), incorruption with the 
 Eucharistic gifts (iv. 18. 5 : cos yo-P <"ro yijs apros, 7rpo<7Aam/3ai>6fiei'Os -rr\v exKArjaip 
 TOU Oeov. ov/ce'ri KOivbs apros itrriv, aAA' cvx a P to " rt ' a > * K &v irpayfidriav <rvv 
 eo"n)Kuta, finyeiov re icai ovpaviov. otirw? Kal TO. tria^a/ra. Vj/xwi/ /aeraA.a/i/Sai/oi'Ta 
 rijs evxapiorias /itrjKeVi elvai </>0apra). It cannot, I think, be reasonably doubted that 
 Irenaeus would have regarded the episcopate as entrusted with the ministry of the 
 sacraments, no less than of the truth, though it was not his present business to lay 
 stress on this ; cf. his words to Victor (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 24) : ' Anicetus allowed 
 Polycarp to celebrate the Eucharist in the Church at Rome ' (Trapex^pijcrei/ T*IV 
 cvxapurriav). Already in Clement's epistle (c. 44) the 'offering of the gifts' is the 
 characteristic function of the bishop. 
 
 1 iv. 33. 8 : Tvucns aAijOijs ^ T<OI> airoordXwi' SiSa.xn< * a ' TO ap\a1ov TTJS cKK\i)<riaf 
 <rv(m)/xa Kara iravrbs rov (cda/iov : et character corporis Christi secundum succes- 
 siones episcoporum, quibus illi earn, quae in unoquoque loco est, ecclesiam tradid- 
 erunt : quae pervenit usque ad nos custoditione sine fictione scripturarum tractatio 
 plenissima, neque additamentum neque ablationem recipiens ; et lectio sine falsatione 
 et secundum scripturas expositio legitima et diligens et sine periculo et sine 
 blasphemia : et praecipuum dilectionis munus." Cf. i. n. i (ifiios xapaicnip) ; 24. 7 ; 
 28. i. 
 
 2 v. 20. i: 'Eorum autem, qui ab ecclesia sunt, semita circumiens mundum 
 universum, quippe firmam habens ab apostolis traditionem, et videre nobis donans 
 omnium unam et eandem esse fidem, omnibus unum et eundem Deum Patrem 
 praecipientibus, et eandem dispositionem incarnationis Filii Dei credentibus, et 
 eandem donationem Spiritus scientibus, et eadem meditantibus praecepta, et eandem 
 figuram eius quae est erga ecclesiam ordinationis custodientibus et eundem exspec- 
 tantibus adventum domini, et eandem salutem totius hominis, id est animae et 
 corporis, sustinentibus.' ('Ordinatio' translates Tafis, i.e. ecclesiastical order, in 
 iii. 3. 3-)
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. in 
 
 Christianity are valuable as showing that to Irenaeus 
 Christianity is not an idea but an institution, a 
 catholic Church, and in the Church the essential link 
 of continuity is the apostolic succession. To it there- 
 fore he makes his great appeal against the Gnostics. 1 
 
 1 All who wish to see the truth have it in their power to fix their both in West 
 eyes on the tradition of the Apostles, which is manifested in all the and East> 
 world ; and we can recount the number of those, who were appointed 
 by the Apostles as bishops in the Churches, and their successors down 
 to our own time, who neither taught nor had any knowledge of the 
 wild notions of these men. For had the Apostles known any mysteries 
 which they taught to the perfect in private and unknown to the rest, 
 they would have delivered them to those surely before all others to 
 whom they intrusted the very Churches themselves. For they desired 
 them to be eminently perfect and utterly without reproach, whom they 
 
 1 iii. 3. 1-3: ' Traditionem itaque apostolorum in toto mundo manifestatam in omni 
 ecclesia adest respicere omnibus qui vera velint videre ; et habemus annumerare eos 
 qui ab apostolis instituti sunt episcopi in ecclesiis et successores eorum usque ad nos, 
 qui nihil tale docuerunt neque cognoverunt, quale ab his deliratur. Etenim si 
 recondita mysteria scissent apostoli, quae seorsim et latenter ab reliquis perfectos 
 docebant, his vel maxime traderent ea quibus etiam ipsas ecclesias committebant. 
 Valde enim perfectos et irreprehensibiles in omnibus eos volebant esse, quos et 
 successores relinquebant, suum ipsorum locum magisterii tradentes ; quibus emendate 
 agentibus fieret magna utilitas, lapsis autem summa calamitas. Sed quoniam valde 
 longum est in hoc tali volumine omnium ecclesiarum enumerare successiones, 
 maximae et antiquissimae et omnibus cognitae, a gloriosissimis duobus apostolis 
 Petro et Paulo Romae fundatae et constitutae ecclesiae earn, quam babel ab 
 apostolis traditionem et annuntiatam hominibus (idem, per successiones episcoporum 
 pervenientem usque ad nos, indicantes confundimus omnes eos, qui quoquo modo 
 vel per sibiplacentiam vel vanam gloriam vel per caecitatem et malam sententiam 
 praeterquam oportet colligunt. Ad hanc enim ecclesiam propter potentiorem 
 [? potiorem] principalitatem necesse est omnem convenire ecclesiam, hoc est eos 
 qui sunt undique fideles, in qua semper ab his, qui sunt undique, conservata est ea 
 quae est ab apostolis traditio. OcfLcAKocraiTet ovv cat oiKo<5ofi7;<rai'-es oi juaxapiot 
 dirooToAot TT\V icA7j<ri'ai>, \iv<a TT\V rrj? eirnTKOTrrj^ AeiTovpycap tytxtipurav TOVTOV 
 TOW AIPOV IlavAos iv rat? irpbs TifioOeov eirioroAais fnffivTfrai- oia&e\eTa.i fie avTov 
 *AyeyicAT/Tos. jutra TOVTOV Se rpirta roirta ajrb T>V ajrooToAwi' rrjv eirio~Koinjv xAijpovrat 
 KAijfiT^, 6 (toi ecopaxuis TOVS ^.axapiov? aTTOordAovs Kai <rvfi.|3ej3A7j<ca>s OUTOIS ai ert 
 e^avAov TO ic^piryfia TUV OTroaToAwv- /tal Tr)p irapd&otriv irpb b<^6a.\fi!av e\iav, ov fiovof 
 ert yap jroAAol vTreAeiVoiro Tore airb TIOV auroarTokiav ScSiSayfievoi . . . TOV Sf 
 KAij/ievra TOVTOV SiaSf^erai EvopeOTos' ical TOV Euapeffroi" 'AAe'favipo?' elff OVTU>? 
 CTOS airb riav a.jrooToAaii' Ka9i<rra.Tai Evoros. fiera fie TOVTOV TeAe<nopos, 05 <cai 
 fv&6ws e/jiapTvpij<reV' eTreira "Yyivo?, eira IIios, fieO' ov ' Avucrfros . SiaSf afi.(vov TOV 
 
 'A.VIKTITOV SoJTTJpO?, VVV SdtOfKOiTta TOJftf TOV TTJS iri<7ICO7rijS alTO TtilV aJTOtrTOAwC KO.Tf\fl 
 
 K\ripov 'EAruffepo?. rtf avTjf rafet ical rg avrfj SiaSoxfj [Euseb. otSaxJi, Lat. succes- 
 sion*] r) Tf ajrb rwf ajrooToAwi' ev TJJ EKjeA^crio irapa&xri? Kai TO rij^ aAij?ei'as
 
 112 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 left behind as their actual successors, handing on to them their own 
 position of presidency.' 
 
 Thus he appeals to the successors of the Apostles. 
 Then, ' because it would be tedious in a volume like 
 this to enumerate the successions of all the Churches,' 
 he gives that of the greatest of all, the Church of 
 Rome a Church to which he attributes a specially 
 representative character l and records how Peter 
 and Paul intrusted the ministry of the episcopate 
 there to Linus, and how he in turn was succeeded by 
 Anencletus, Clement, Evarestus, Alexander, Xystus, 
 Telesphorus the martyr, Hyginus, Pius, Anicetus, 
 Soter, and finally in his own day Eleutherus. Thus 
 ' there has come down to us with the same order and 
 the same succession the tradition from the Apostles 
 in the Church and the preaching of the truth.' With 
 this tradition of truth ' coming down to us through 
 the succession of the bishops,' Irenaeus proceeds to 
 ' confound ' his opponents, corroborating, however, 
 the tradition of the West, according to his essential 
 principle, with the apostolic tradition of the Church 
 of Smyrna and ' all the Churches of Asia.' 2 
 
 What we have quoted will be enough to illustrate 
 his method of appeal. The results of it he constantly 
 presses on the men of his time. 'We must obey 
 those who are the elders in the Church, those who, 
 as we have shown, have the succession from the 
 
 1 It seems most probable that the words of disputed meaning should be translated 
 'for to this Church, on account of its special pre-eminence, all Churches must needs 
 come together, that is the faithful from all sides, and in her the apostolic tradition 
 has been always preserved by those who are from all parts' I think Langen 
 (Gesch. der Rdmischcn Kirche i. pp. 170-174) has made this interpretation good. 
 But it does not concern us here. 
 
 2 iii. 3. 4 : Kai IIoA.vcap7ros . . . vrb OTrooroAwi/ KaTaaraflius ets rrjf 'Aaiap ev TJJ 
 iv Sfiupi/T) e(e<cAr)(Ti<f eiriVitOTros . . . Taura SiSafas aei, a KOL irapa. TCOI/ dwooToAiui' 
 efjLa8ev, a (cat ^ c)cXi)<rta 7rapa6u5u>cru', a Kai /mova early aArjSrj. jiiapTVpov<7i TOUTOIV 
 01 KOTO Tiji' 'Ao-i'ai/ 6KKArj(n<u jrairoi.
 
 III.] The Witness of CJiurch History. 113 
 
 Apostles : who, with the succession of the episcopate, 
 have received also the sure gift of truth according to 
 the will of the Father : but as for the rest, who leave 
 the original succession and come together wherever 
 it may be, them we must hold in suspicion, whether 
 as heretics of a wrong opinion, or as men who make 
 division through pride and self-pleasing, or again as 
 hypocrites.' x ' Where one is to find [the true elders], 
 Paul teaches, when he says, " God set in the Church 
 first apostles, secondly prophets, thirdly teachers." 
 Where, then, the gifts of God are placed, there he 
 should learn the truth, with those who have the 
 Church's succession from the Apostles and maintain 
 a sound and irreproachable mode of life and uncor- 
 ruptness of speech.' 2 
 
 The position of Irenaeus is thus very clear and accepted by 
 definite. It is accepted by his more brilliant but less C.^.D/^O'; 
 stable disciple, Tertullian, who reproduces his argu- 
 ment with striking vigour in his work, called Prae- 
 scriptiones (or ' Preliminary Pleas ') against the 
 Gnostic teachers. In it he has a double question to 
 ask these pretenders to represent Christianity. First 
 do they hold the rule of faith ? Secondly have 
 they an apostolic succession ? ' Let them produce 
 the account of the origins of their Churches ; let them 
 unroll the line of their bishops, running down in such 
 
 1 iv. 26. 2 : ' Quapropter eis qui in ecclesia sunt presbyteris oboedire oportet, his 
 qui successionem habent ab apostolis, sicut ostendimus ; qui cum episcopatus sue- 
 cessione charisma veritatis certum secundum placitum Patris acceperunt ; reliquos 
 vero, qui absistunt a principal! successione et quocunque loco colligunt,suspectos 
 habere vel quasi haereticos et malae sententiae, vel quasi scindentes et elatos et sibi 
 placentes, aut rursus ut hypocritas quaestus gratia et vanae gloriae hoc o per antes.' 
 
 2 ib. 5 : ' Ubi igitur tales inveniat aliquis, Paulus docens ait : Posuit Deus in 
 ecclesia primo apostolos, secundo prophetas, tertio doctores. Ubi igitur charismata 
 domini posita sunt, ibi discere oportet veritatem, apud quos est ea quae est ab 
 apostolis ecclesiae successio et id quod est sanum et irreprobabile conversationis et 
 inadulteratum et incorruptibile sermonis constat.' 
 
 H
 
 1 14 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 a way from the beginning that their first bishop shall 
 have had for his authorizer and predecessor one of 
 the Apostles, or of the apostolic men who continued 
 to the end in their fellowship. This is the way in 
 which the apostolic Churches hand in their registers : 
 as the Church of the Smyrnaeans relates that Poly- 
 carp was installed by John, as the Church of the 
 Romans relates that Clement was ordained by Peter. 
 So in like manner the rest of the Churches exhibit 
 the names of men appointed to the episcopate by 
 Apostles, whom they possess as transmitters of the 
 apostolic seed.' l ' So now,' we resume after a few 
 chapters, ' you who wish to exercise your curiosity to 
 better profit in the matter of your salvation, run 
 through the apostolic Churches, where the very chairs 
 of the Apostles still preside in their own places '- 
 Corinth, Philippi, Thessalonica, Ephesus, Rome. 
 Make it your business to inquire what they have 
 learned and taught ! This is his challenge. 2 The 
 unchanging tradition goes hand in hand with the 
 
 1 de Praescr. 32: 'Ceterum si quae [haereses] audent interserere se aetati apos- 
 tolicae, ut ideo videantur ab apostolis traditae, quia sub apostolis fuerunt, possumus 
 dicere : Edant ergo origines ecclesiarum suarum, evolvant ordinem episcoporuin 
 suorum, ita per successiones ab initio decurrentem, ut primus ille episcopus aliquem 
 ex apostolis vel apostolicis viris, qui tamen cum apostolis perseveraverit, habuerit 
 auctorem et antecessorem. Hoc enim modo ecclesiae apostolicae census suos 
 deferunt, sicut Smyrnaeorum ecclesia Polycarpum ab loanne collocatum refert, sicut 
 Romanorum Clementem a Petro ordinatum. Itidem proinde utique et ceterae ex- 
 hibent, quos ab apostolis in episcopatum constitutes apostolici seminis traduces 
 habeant. Confingant tale aliquid haeretici. Quid enim illis post blasphemias 
 illicitum est?' 
 
 2 ib. 36 : ' Age iam, qui voles curiositatem melius exercere in negotio salutis tuae, 
 percurre ecclesias apostolicas, apud quas ipsae adhuc cathedrae apostolorum suis 
 locis praesidentur, apud quas ipsae authenticae literae eorum recitantur, sonantes 
 vocem et repraesentantes faciem uniuscuiusque. Proxima est tibi Achaia? habes 
 Corinthum. Si non longe es a Macedonia, habes Philippos, habes Thessalonicenses. 
 Si poles in Asiam tendere, habes Ephesum. Si autem Italiae adiaces, habes Romam, 
 unde nobis quoque auctoritas praesto est . . . Videamus quid didicerit [ecclesia 
 Romana], quid docuerit, quid cum Africanis quoque ecclesiis contesserarit.' ib. 37 : 
 ' Si haec ita se habent, ut veritas nobis adiudicetur, quicunque in ea regula incedi- 
 mus, quam ecclesia ab apostolis, apostoli a Christo, Christus a Deo tradidit, constat 
 ratio propositi nostri.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 115 
 
 steadfast ministerial succession, just as on the con- 
 trary the novelties of heresy are associated with care- 
 lessness about order. ' Their ordinations are heedless, 
 capricious, changeable. At one time they appoint 
 neophytes ; at another, men bound to secular em- 
 ployment ; at another, apostates from us so that 
 official distinction may act as a bond to hold them, 
 where truth cannot. Nowhere is promotion so easy 
 as in the camp of rebels, where even one's presence 
 is in itself a claim. And so one is a bishop to-day, 
 another to-morrow ; the reader of to-morrow is a 
 deacon to-day ; the layman of to-morrow a pres- 
 byter to-day. For they impose even on laymen the 
 functions of the priesthood.' 1 
 
 The age of Irenaeus is to be for the present our anticipated 
 starting-point ; but it is important to emphasize that ^pp^f e ' 
 there is no originality about his ecclesiastical concep- c ' A ' D ' I&5 ' 
 tions. Not only does his own language exclude such 
 a supposition, but we have external testimony to the 
 same effect. Eusebius 2 has preserved for us some 
 words of Hegesippus, ' the father of church history,' 
 in which he is speaking of his journey to the West, 
 made not later than A.D. 167 : 'The Church of the 
 Corinthians,' he says, 'remained in the right word 
 down to Primus' bishopric in Corinth. I had inter- 
 
 1 zi. 41 : ' Ordinationes eorum temerariae, leves, inconstantes. Nunc neophytos 
 collocant, nunc saeculo obstrictos, nunc apostatas nostros, nt gloria eos obligent, quia 
 veritate non possunt. Nusquam facilius proficitur quam in castris rebellium, ubi 
 ipsum esse illic promereri est. Itaque alius hodie episcopus, eras alius ; hodie 
 diaconus, qui eras lector ; hodie presbyter, qui eras laicus ; nam et laicis sacerdotalia 
 munera iniungunt.' 
 
 2 Hegesipp. ap. Euseb. H. E. iv. 22 : Kai eire'/ievv T\ (cA7)<ri'o Vj Kopu'diW tv r<f 
 bpdia \oy<a fie'xpt Hpt/iov eirtoveoTrevoiros iv KopiV9o>" ots <rwtyLta irA'ap ei? 'Pa>/ni]v, 
 <ai <njv&tfTpi\l/a, rot? Kopirdi'oi; Tjjxe'pCK ucai/d?, fv at 9 <ruva.i>eird7)fi.ev r<2 bpfka \6yta. 
 ffvofievos 5 tV'Pco/tiT) 5tao\r)v 7roii7<rafH)^ fie'^pis 'AiuioJTOU, ou SLOLKOVOS ^f'EAe'uOepos' 
 Aral irapa 'Ai'ttojrou SiaSi^erat Samjp, ftefl* ov 'EAruflpo. ev aoTp 8e SiaSoxrj <cai 
 fv cxaaTT) nAf i ovT<i>f e.\i, lot 6 fd/xot KT)pi/(T<7ei teal oi Trpo^vjrai Kai b icvptof .
 
 1 1 6 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 course with them when I was sailing to Rome, and 
 I passed some days with the Corinthians, in which 
 we took comfort together in the right word. And 
 when I was in Rome I made a succession [i.e., a list 
 of the succession] down to Anicetus, whose deacon 
 was Eleutherus. And from Anicetus, Soter succeeds, 
 and after him Eleutherus. Now in each succession 
 and in each city it is as the law proclaims and the 
 prophets and the Lord.' Hegesippus then had found 
 a succession in each city. He made a list for the 
 purpose of his history at Rome ; but there, as else- 
 where, he had found the thing existing. Let Hege- 
 sippus' testimony then reinforce that of Irenaeus. 
 
 Starting thus from about the middle of the second 
 
 century the episcopal succession is an undoubted fact 
 
 Further in all known Christian Churches. It is, however, 
 
 detail" 06 desirable to review the evidence not only of the fact, 
 
 but also of the importance attached to it. 
 A. The East. A. We begin with the East, and in the East with 
 the "cradle of our religion" Palestine. 'As early 
 as the middle of the second century all parties concur 
 in representing James [the Lord's brother] as a bishop 
 in the strict sense of the term.' 1 The episcopate, 
 that is to say, was at that date an institution certainly 
 believed to derive in Jerusalem from St. James. 
 Eusebius has preserved to us a complete list of the 
 successors of Symeon, who was chosen in his place 
 first, thirteen Jewish bishops, and then, after the 
 annihilation of Jerusalem and the foundation upon 
 its site of Aelia Capitolina, thirteen Gentile bishops, 2 
 
 1 Lightfoot Dissert, p. 208. See Hegesipp. ap. Euseb. //. E . iv. 22 ; the Clemen- 
 tine Ep. Petri, Ep. Clem, init., Horn. xi. 35 ; and Clem. Alex. ap. Euseb. H. E. 
 ii. i. In this review of second century episcopacy I am mainly following Dr. J,ight- 
 foot. 
 
 2 Euseb. H. E. iv. 5, v. 12.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 117 
 
 down to the accession of the venerable Narcissus, 
 who was engaged in the Paschal controversy. 1 There 
 can be at least no doubt of the existence in Jerusalem 
 of an episcopal succession of immemorial antiquity 
 at the date which is our starting-point for the present. 
 In the Paschal controversy we find the bishop ofA.D. i 5 s. 
 Jerusalem associated with three other Palestinian 
 bishops 2 (of Caesarea, Tyre, Ptolemais), in writing 
 an encyclical letter in favour of the western view. 
 The testimony of the Clementines, 3 which may be 
 taken to represent Ebionite ideas at the end of the 
 second century, goes to assure us that at that date 
 the episcopate at Caesarea, Tyre, Sidon, Berytus, 
 Tripolis, and Laodicea could plausibly be represented 
 as having been instituted by St. Peter. 4 It must be 
 noticed that there is the same insistence upon the 
 episcopal succession in the Ebionite Clementines as 
 in the fragments of Hegesippus and in the writings 
 of Irenaeus ; episcopacy, and episcopacy derived 
 
 * Euseb. H. E. v. 23. 
 
 2 Euseb. H. E. v. 25. 
 
 3 The Clementine Homilies and Recognitions contain substantially the same 
 narrative. They purport to contain an account given by Clement of his connection 
 with St. Peter and of St. Peter 'sjourneyings, discourses, etc., including his institution 
 of bishops, presbyters, and deacons at various places in Syria. Both are Ebionite, 
 though the Recognitions present Ebionite ideas in a very modified form. Both are 
 based apparently on an earlier document, and are of Syrian origin. Dr. Salmon 
 {Diet. Chr. Biog. CLEMENTINE LIT.) dates the Recogn. about A.D. 200 and the 
 Homilies about A.D. 218. [Origen quotes the former about A.D. 230.] He thinks the 
 document on which they are based may go back to A. D. 160. Dr. Lightfoot says : 
 ' the Homilies cannot well be placed later than the end, and should perhaps be 
 placed before the middle of the second century ' (Dissert, p. 211). There are also 
 two letters to James from Peter and Clement, both now prefixed to the Homilies, 
 but the latter probably served originally as preface to the Recognitions (Diet. Chr. 
 Biog. i. p. 570). It describes St. Peter's ordination of Clement as bishop of Rome. 
 
 4 See Recogn. vi. 15 : '[Peter] appointed as bishop over them [at Tripolis] Maro 
 . . . and with him he ordained twelve presbyters and deacons at the same time. 
 Cf. iii. 66 (Caesarea, bishop, twelve presbyters, and four deacons), x. 68 (Laodicea); 
 Horn. iii. 72 (Caesarea), vii. 5 (Tyre),'8 (Sidon), 12 (Berytus), xi. 36 (Tripolis, bishop, 
 twelve presbyters, and deacons), xx. 23 (Laodicea). See also Ep. Clem, ad lac.
 
 c. A.D. no. 
 
 Il8 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 from the Apostles, was not, we perceive, a matter 
 of dispute. 1 
 Syria, The episcopal succession at Antiock is historical 
 
 /- a r T v A * * 
 
 at least from Ignatius. If we cannot fully rely upon 
 the list of bishops given us by Eusebius, 2 at least 
 bishop Theophilus, the apologist, and bishop Serapion 
 come out into the light during the second century. 
 
 So much for the Church of Palestine and the 
 Greek Church of Syria. Of the early ' Syrian Church, 
 strictly so called ' the Syriac-speaking Church we 
 have no authentic history. It is, however, worth while 
 noticing that the early traditions of that Church 
 represent the 'ordination to the priesthood' as the 
 
 1 It is worth while collecting the conception of the ministry given in the Clemen- 
 tine documents. 
 
 (1) There is the idea of succession to the Apostles. Clement succeeds St. Peter 
 (Ep, Clem. 2, 19). St. Peter, in his letter to James, emphasizes the idea of succession 
 on the analogy of the seventy elders who succeeded to ' the chair of Moses.' Here 
 the successors seem to be the whole presbyterate, but subordination to the bishop is 
 strongly marked (Ep. Petr. 4. 2). The bishop's chair is also called ' the chair of 
 Christ ' (Ep. Clem. 17, and Horn. iii. 70). 
 
 (2) The idea of the episcopal succession is mainly that of succession to the teaching 
 office, in order to keep the tradition (cf. Irenaeus): see Ep. Petr. init. and Ep. 
 Clem. 2, 6 : 17 riav \6yiav KaOeSpa, b Trjs a.\T)9(ia.s 7rpoica0e<Joju.ei'O9 ) 6 TTJJ <x\i70eias 
 irpe<r/3ur>)9. But the bishop has intrusted to him ' the authority to bind and loose ' 
 with divine sanction (ib. 2 : avTco jmeraSiSw/ju 1171' cfoucriai/ TOV Sev/ueveip al \ueif, 'iva. 
 jrepl TTai/rbs oC av x e 'PTOi/jj<rjj TTI TJJS yijs e<rrai SeSoyjmaTio>ieVoi' ev ovpavols '. cf. ib. 
 6, Horn. iii. 72); he is the Trpoeorais (Ep. Clem. 6) ; he has the general administration 
 of the Church (8ioiKT)<rts, ib. 3, etc.) ; and all is to be done by the presbyters with his 
 knowledge (Ep. Petr. 4. 2). He is to be kept clear from secular cares (Ep. Clem. 
 5, 6). St. Peter is represented as baptizing and breaking bread ; also the elders at 
 Jerusalem as baptizing (Ep. Petr. 4. i). 
 
 (3) Presbyters are to exercise moral discipline ; to administer charitable relief ; I 
 reconcile disputants (Ep. Clem. 7-10 ; Horn. iii. 67, 68). The deacons are ' the eyes 
 of the bishop,' to assist his pastoral care in the distribution of alms, with considerable 
 independence in the latter department (Ep. Clem.. 12 ; Horn. iii. 67). There is also 
 mention of catechists, but the bishop is represented in one place as the catechist 
 (Ep. Clem. 13, 14). The Ship of the Church is described elaborately with her full 
 equipment of officers, etc. (ib. 14, 15). 
 
 (4) Ordination is by laying on of hands (Ep. Clem. 19 ; Horn. iii. 72 ; Recogn. iii. 
 66), with accompanying prayer (Horn. iii. 72). 
 
 In all this there is nothing specially Ebionite ; but James is called ' bishop of 
 bishops,' and has a universal authority ascribed to him (Ep. Clem. init.). Even 
 Peter, though he is called ' first of apostles ' (ib. i), has to give an annual account to 
 him of his doings (Recogn. i, 17), and is subject to him (ib. 72). This is Ebionite. 
 
 3 Euseb. H. E. iv. 20, 34 ; v. 23.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 119 
 
 means of the propagation of the Gospel, venerate the 
 threefold ministry as of apostolic institution, and lay 
 great stress on the episcopal succession derived in 
 each Church from an apostle through the laying on 
 of hands. 1 
 
 We pass from Syria to ' Asia ' to find the epi- Asia Minor, 
 scopal succession a very old established institution. 
 It is enough to say that Ignatius had impressed A.D. no. 
 upon the Churches of Ephesus, Magnesia, Tralles, 
 Philadelphia, and Smyrna, that the bishop, with the 
 presbyters and deacons, represents the authority of 
 God, and we are not allowed to doubt that at least 
 they learned the lesson. Besides Polycarp of Smyrna, 
 Onesimus of Ephesus, Damas of Magnesia, and 
 Polybius of Tralles, whom Ignatius mentions, we 
 hear during the second century of Papias, a contem- 
 porary of Polycarp, and Claudius Apollinaris, bishops 
 of Hierapolis, 2 of Sagaris, bishop of Laodicea, and 
 
 1 See The Teaching of Addaeus the Apostle and The Teaching of the Apostles 
 ancient Syriac documents, trans, in Clark's Ante-Nicene Library, vol. xx esp. pp. 
 32, 48. See Tixeront Origines de feglise d"Edesse pp. 114 ff. The former is a re- 
 touched version, dating apparently from about 400 A.D., of the document quoted by 
 Eusebius (ff. E. i. 1 3), which existed in 'the archives of Edessa, at that time a royal 
 city. 1 The latter document uses an old pre-Peshitto Syriac reading. As to their 
 ecclesiastical ideas, it may be noted that the bishop is called by a word translated 
 ' guide and ruler.' Addaeus, the apostle, ordains Aggaeus, and he ' made priests and 
 guides in the whole country of Mesopotamia.' The authority of the guide is limited : 
 ' it is not lawful for him to transact the affairs of the Church apart from those who 
 minister with him ' ( Teaching of the Apostles p. 41). Cf. Lightfoot Dissert, p. 21 1 n. 6 
 It should be noticed that the apostles who originate 'ordination to the priesthood' 
 (Teaching of the Apostles p. 48) are reckoned at seventy-two, and amongst them are 
 Luke and Addaeus, whom Eusebius calls Thaddaeus and describes as ' one of the 
 seventy disciples of Christ' (H. E. \. 13). The number seventy-two represents the 
 older Curetonian Syriac reading of St. Luke x. i ; the Peshitto has ' seventy.' (On 
 the relations of the Cur. Syr. to the Pesh. see Westcott and Hort, Introd. to N. T. 
 pp. 84, 85). The Arab, El Makrizi (who wrote a history of the Coptic Church in the 
 fourteenth century, but drew upon earlier authors, such as Eutychius) speaks likewise 
 of ' seventy apostles ' (in Malan Orig. Doc. of the Copt. Ch. iii. p. 23) ; this may 
 represent some old Alexandrian statement, directly or indirectly. 
 
 2 The episcopate of Claudius, c. A.D. 171, rests on the authority of his contemporary, 
 Serapion (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 19) ; Papias' on that of Eusebius representing the 
 common account (//. E. ii. 15).
 
 I2O Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Melito, bishop of Sardis. 1 Polycrates, bishop of 
 Ephesus at the end of the second century, speaks of 
 himself as having had seven of his own family before 
 him in the episcopate, whose traditions he followed. 2 
 If we pass from the proconsular province to Asia 
 Minor, in the wider sense of the term, we have not 
 much evidence bearing on the subject ; but we hear 
 of bishops in the second century at Sinope 3 and at 
 Eumenia, 4 at Amastris, at Comana, at Apamea 6 ; 
 and there is no indication such as would lead us to 
 doubt the universal extension of the episcopate in 
 the Churches of that country. Towards the end of 
 the century episcopal synods become common ; at 
 the time of the Paschal controversy there were a 
 number of bishops in Pontus ; and Polycrates 6 speaks 
 of ' great crowds ' of bishops whom he had summoned 
 to conference on that subject. 
 
 If there is less evidence of the diffusion of episco- 
 pacy in Greece in the latter half of the second cen- 
 tury, this probably does not mean more than that the 
 Church there was less prominent than the Church in 
 Asia. 7 Where we hear of church government it is 
 episcopal. At Corinth, when Hegesippus visited it, 
 there was not only a bishop, Primus, but a succes- 
 
 1 c. A.D. 150-170, on the authority of Polycrates in Euseb. H. E. v. 24. 
 
 2 Euseb. H. E. v. 24. 
 
 3 Marcion of Sinope is described as ' episcopi filius ' in [adv. Omn. Haer. appended 
 to] Tertull. de Praescr. 51. Marcion propagated his system before the middle of the 
 second century. He was himself recognised as bishop by his sect and organized it 
 on the Church's model ; ' faciunt favos et vespae, et faciunt ecclesias Marcionitae ' 
 (Tertull. adv. Marc. 5). 
 
 4 Polycrates ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 34. 
 
 8 Palmas of Amastris is mentioned by Dionysius of Corinth writing to the Churches 
 of Pontus (Euseb. H. E. iv. 23). Zoticos of Comana and Julianus of Apamea are 
 mentioned by the anonymous contemporary adversary of the Montanists (ap. Euseb. 
 H. E. v. 1 6). 
 
 Euseb. H. E. v. 24. 
 
 ' The problems presented by the Epistles of Clement and Polycarp will be con- 
 sidered below. They do not fall within this period.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 121 
 
 sion l ; after him we hear of Dionysius, and at the 
 time of the Paschal controversy of Bacchyllus. 2 In 
 the mention which Eusebius makes of one of 
 Dionysius' letters 'to the Athenians' (about A.D. 
 170), we hear of at least two bishops in the succes- 
 sion of Athens prior to that date Publius, who was 
 martyred, and Quadratus, who had recalled their 
 Church from something like ' apostacy from the word,' 
 into which they had fallen. 3 It is doubtful whether 
 this bishop can be identified with that Quadratus 
 whom Eusebius records to have presented his 
 Apology to Hadrian at Athens. 4 But if Dionysius 
 did, as Eusebius says he did, describe his namesake 
 the Areopagite as the first bishop of Athens, he 
 must have believed the episcopate there to go back 
 to the apostolic age. 5 
 
 We have the names of no bishops on contemporary 
 evidence during the second century in Macedonia, 
 but when Tertullian is rhetorically bidding the here- 
 tical teachers to take counsel of ' the apostolic 
 Churches, where the very chairs of the Apostles 
 still preside,' he goes on, ' Is Achaia nearest to you ? 
 you have Corinth ; if you are not far from Macedonia, 
 you have Philippi, you have Thessalonica/ showing 
 that at the end of the century Macedonia had 
 episcopal successions which were believed to be 
 derived from apostolic ordination. 6 
 
 If we pass from Macedonia to Thrace we pass to Thrace. 
 a district almost without Christian record, but to- 
 
 1 Euseb. H. E. iv. 22. 2 Euseb. H. . iv. 23 ; v. 22, 23. 
 
 3 Euseb. H. E. iv. 23. Publius is called 6 n-po<rro>s OLVTUV. 
 
 4 The question is discussed in Texts and Studies vol. i. No. i. pp. 10 ff. 
 6 Euseb. H. E. iii. 4 ; iv. 23. 
 
 6 Tertull. de Praescr. 36. Cf. Origen on Rom. xvi. 23 : fertur sane traditione 
 maiorum quod hie Gaius [St. Paul's host] primus episcopus fuerit Thessalonicensis 
 ecclesiae.'
 
 122 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 wards the end of the century we find a bishop of 
 Debeltum signing an encyclical letter, directed 
 against the Montanists, 1 ' and the existence of a see 
 at a place so unimportant implies the wide spread of 
 episcopacy in these regions.' z 
 
 Crete. On our passage from Greece to Egypt we may 
 
 take Crete by the way. There we know that at least 
 two episcopal sees existed about A.D. 170, for Diony- 
 sius of Corinth wrote a letter ' to the Cnossians,' with 
 words of advice to Pinytus their bishop, and another 
 ' to the Church at Gortyna, with the other parishes 
 [i.e. dioceses] in Crete,' specially commending Philip, 
 the bishop of Gortyna, who is also known as the 
 author of a work against Marcion. 3 
 
 Alexandria. On arriving at Alexandria we shall undoubtedly 
 find ourselves in a Church of the three orders. It is 
 true that we cannot trace to its source or verify the 
 complete and dated list of Alexandrian bishops, 
 which Eusebius gives us, reaching back to St. Mark 
 as founder of the Church. 4 We do not in fact know 
 the name of any Alexandrian bishop on indisputable 
 evidence till we get to Demetrius, Origen's contem- 
 porary ; for ' the Alexandrian succession, in which 
 history is hitherto most interested, is not the succes- 
 sion of the bishops, but of the heads of the cate- 
 chetical school.' 5 But Clement's evidence gives us all 
 
 Thesis- that we want. He was born about the middle of the 
 
 bishops at second century, and not only had the Church which 
 
 Alexandria 1-1 i, , i i 
 
 indisputable ; he knew bishops, presbyters, and deacons, 6 but it had 
 
 1 Euseb. H.E. y. 19. 
 
 2 Lightfoot Dissert, p. 217. 3 Euseb. H. E. iv. 23, 25. 
 
 4 Euseb. H.E. ii. 24 (Mark, Annianus) iii. 14 (Abilius) 21 (Cerdon) iv. i (Primus), 
 etc. 5 Lightfoot Dissert, p. 226. 
 
 6 ' The grades in the Church here of bishops, presbyters, deacons, I believe to be 
 imitations of the angelic glory ' (Strom, vi. 13. 107 : at ivravda. Kara -n\v eKK\rj<riav 
 irpOKOiral ema-Koviav, irpfffpvTfpiav, Staxoviav, fit^ijjiiaTa otfiai ayycAiKJjs SOT)S.) The 
 whole chapter runs thus : The perfect Christian gnostic is even here equal to the
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 123 
 
 even passed out of memory that ' bishop ' and ' pres- 
 
 angels: he maybe made equal to the Apostles: 'not that they became apostles 
 because they were chosen for some special peculiarity of nature, for Judas was 
 chosen with them ; but they were capable of becoming apostles on being chosen by 
 Him Who foresaw even how they would end. For Matthias, who was not chosen 
 with them, on showing himself fit (afios) to become an apostle, is substituted for 
 Judas. So now too, those who have exercised themselves in the Lord's command- 
 ments and have lived perfectly and with knowledge (yi/woriKais), according to the 
 Gospel, may be enrolled (eyypou^rjvat) in the chosen body of the Apostles. Such an 
 one is in reality a presbyter of the Church and a true deacon of the will of God, if 
 he do and teach the things of the Lord, not being ordained (x'porovovjoiei/os) by man, 
 nor reckoned just because he is a presbyter, but counted ((caTaAeyo^ei/os) in the 
 presbyterate because he is just. And even if here upon earth he be not honoured 
 with the chief seat (TrpuroKafcSpia), he will sit on the four and twenty thrones 
 judging the people, as John says in the Apocalypse.' The four and twenty elders, 
 he continues, are the chosen of the chosen, equally from Jews or Greeks. ' Since 
 I think the grades in the Church here of bishops, presbyters, deacons are imitations 
 of the angelic glory and of that dispensation (otKovo/bita;) which the Scriptures say 
 await those who, following the footsteps of the Apostles, have lived in perfection of 
 righteousness according to the Gospel. For these, the Apostle writes, "lifted up 
 in the clouds " will serve their diaconate first (Siewcoi'TJo-eii'), then be reckoned with 
 the presbyterate in a higher grade of glory, for glory differeth from glory, until they 
 grow up into a perfect man.' Clement's meaning is apparently that moral excellence 
 and gnostic enlightenment were qualifications for the apostolate of old and make a 
 man a true priest now (cf. the exclamation of the people in demanding Athanasius' 
 election 'aATjftiseTri'crKOJros,' Athan. Apol. c. Ar. 6); not, however, in the sense that 
 they can enable a man to dispense with ordination or justify him in assuming 
 ministerial functions without it, but only in the sense that, if he be not admitted to 
 the clergy here, he will be hereafter raised to those grades of glory which the pre- 
 sent distinctive offices in the Church adumbrate here below ; they are titles for a 
 place in the hierarchy in heaven, if not here. It will be noticed that though 
 Clement divides the hierarchy into three orders, he can still (like Origen and many 
 others) speak of the presbyterate as the 'chief seat' ( 106 above). The main dis- 
 tinction with him, as with Irenaeus and many after them, is between presbyters and 
 deacons. Thus in another passage (Strom, vii. i. 3), contrasting the two sorts of 
 ministry to men the more menial service (vTnjpeTiitTJ) and the higher ministry of 
 improvement (/SeAriomio] Bepaneia) he finds the former exemplified in the Church's 
 
 bishop. 
 
 Clement's position on many points is somewhat hard to define. His line of 
 thought is not one which, like that of Irenaeus, leads him to speak much about the 
 ministry. At the same time there is an intellectualism in his whole conception 
 of religion, a recognition of a ' priesthood of knowledge ' (for reffs. see Bigg B.L. 
 p. 101), which represents an| opposite tendency to the ' priesthood of enthusiasm" 
 among the Montanists. This, we must acknowledge, whatever fascination 
 Clement's gentle, pious, generous spirit has for us had in it dangerous elements 
 of Gnosticism, and led him even.to shrink from attributing to our Lord real human 
 feelings, a real flesh and blood like ours (Bigg B.L. pp. 93, 71 n. 5 ); it makes him 
 in a measure depreciate mere faith and desire to create ' a Church within a Church,' 
 a Church of the spiritually enlightened (Bigg p. 85 f.). Thus it may have tended to
 
 124 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 byter ' were interchangeable titles in St. Paul's days. 1 
 We have some additional reason to believe that the 
 episcopate was recognised at Alexandria as distinct 
 from the presbyterate very early in the century. 
 The emperor Hadrian visited Alexandria in A.D. 130, 
 and he gave an account of his visit in a letter to 
 Servianus which is preserved. Amidst the motley 
 crowd of the devotees of all sorts of religions and 
 superstitions, whose fickle inconsistency, as it 
 appeared in his eyes, half amused and half dis- 
 gusted him, he recognised the ' bishops of Christ ' as 
 distinct figures from the Christian presbyters. 2 
 but Jerome There is thus no ground for doubting the existence 
 of an episcopal succession at Alexandria long before 
 the middle of the second century. But we have it 
 on Jerome's evidence that this succession had some 
 peculiarity. He is writing 3 in a state of great in- 
 dignation with the arrogance of deacons in the Church 
 
 make him depreciate the ministry which comes of ordination by comparison with 
 the priesthood of knowledge, but there is no evidence of this. His point of view is 
 not at all unecctesiastical. Christianity is not by any means to him a mere idea or 
 philosophy ; it is embodied in a visible society. Nor in the passage quoted is there 
 anything to lead us to suppose that he shrank from recognising the necessity for 
 orders in the Church, or their exclusive rights, any more than he shrank from recog- 
 nising the exclusive prerogative of the Church. Dr. Bigg says no more than is true 
 when he says : ' It is important to add . . . that Clement lays great stress upon the 
 observance of the existing church discipline, the regular use of all the ordinary 
 means of grace' (pp. 96, 97). He very likely, however, did not recognise fully that 
 ' the unworthiness of the minister hinders not the grace of the sacraments,' and he 
 speaks of baptism administered by heretics as OVK otxctov icai yfijtrioi/ iJSiap (Strom. 
 i. 19. 96). On this, and on his not using sacerdotal language of the ministry, see 
 below, p. 1 80 f. 
 
 1 Paed. iii. 12. 97: 'there are an infinite number of suggestions in the sacred 
 books directed to select persons, some to presbyters, some to bishops, some to 
 deacons, others to widows.' 
 
 2 See his letter to Servianus (ap. Vopisc., quoted by Lightfoot Ignatius i. 464 ; cf. 
 Dissert, p. 225) : ' Illic qui Serapem colunt Christiani sunt, et devoti sunt Serapi 
 qui Christ! se episcopos dicunt. Nemo illic archisynagogus ludaeorum, nemo 
 Samarites, nemo Christianorum presbyter, non mathematicus, non haruspex, 
 non aliples. Ipse ille patriarcha, cum Aegyptum venerit, ab aliis Serapidem 
 adorare, ab aliis cogitur Christum.' The 'patriarcha' is (no doubt) the Jewish 
 patriarch. 
 
 3 Ep. cxlvi ad Evangclitm.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 125 
 
 of Rome. He (like other patristic writers) wishes to 
 emphasize, as a corrective to their self-assertion, the 
 especial dignity of that priesthood, which, with some 
 differences of function, presbyter and bishop share in 
 common. His view will be considered later, but he 
 illustrates it by a practice which he attributes to the 
 Church of Alexandria in earlier days, and with this 
 illustration we are now concerned. 
 
 Jerome then asserts that 'from the days of St. that down to 
 Mark the Evangelist down to the episcopates of nd'A 3 D.249- 
 Heraclas and Dionysius the presbyters at Alexandria btftops were 
 used always to appoint as bishop one chosen out of by n mere ted 
 their number and placed upon the higher grade, just ele 
 as if an army were making a general, or deacons 
 were choosing one of themselves whose diligence 
 they knew and calling him archdeacon. For what ' 
 (he asks) ' except ordination does a bishop do which 
 a presbyter does not ? ' l The language of this state- 
 ment is ambiguous, but Jerome seems to mean, as he 
 was certainly understood to mean by later Latin 
 writers, that there was no fresh consecration or 
 ordination required in earlier days at Alexandria to 
 make a presbyter bishop, but that he became bishop 
 simply in virtue of his election by the other presby- 
 ters. There would have been thus a substantial 
 identity between the two orders. Jerome had of 
 course resided at Alexandria, and had had oppor- 
 tunities of making himself acquainted with Alex- 
 andrian traditions; but, if this is his meaning, his His state- 
 statement does not find independent support where ^)" ac ks 
 we have a right to expect it. 2 Epiphanius, f O r support; 
 
 1 The Latin is quoted in App. Note B, where there is some further discussion of 
 the matter. 
 
 - His statement is copied by later Latin writers, and an Arab patriarch of the 
 tenth cent., Eutycbius, is quoted in support ; on whom see App. Note B. Surely
 
 126 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 example, Jerome's older contemporary and bishop of 
 Salamis in Cyprus, though he knew Egypt better 
 than Jerome and was acquainted with the peculiar 
 position of the Alexandrian presbyters, which antici- 
 pated that of the parish priests of later days was 
 seemingly ignorant of any such fact as Jerome men- 
 tions. 1 There is no trace of it in any Alexandrian 
 writer of the third or fourth centuries. Thus Athana- 
 sius records how a council at Alexandria in A.D. 324 
 had declared null and void a pretended ordination by 
 a schismatical presbyter, Colluthus. It has been 
 recently suggested that the mere fact of such an 
 ordination having occurred is a sign that the older 
 traditions of the substantial identity of the bishop 
 and the presbyter still survived in the byways of the 
 Alexandrian Church. But Athanasius' language, or 
 rather the language he quotes from the letter of a 
 synod of Egyptian bishops held in A.D. 324, does not 
 countenance this. ' How then,' they ask, ' is Ischyras 
 a presbyter ? Who appointed him ? Colluthus, was 
 it not ? This is the only plea left. But that Collu- 
 thus died a presbyter, and that his every ordination is 
 invalid and all who were appointed by him in his 
 schism have come out laymen and are so treated, is 
 plain, and nobody doubts it' ' 2 This is not the language 
 
 Dr. Lightfoot is mistaken (Dissert, p. 231 n. 2 ) when he quotes Ambrosiaster (in 
 Eph. iv. 12) in support of Jerome: 'denique,' says Ambrosiaster, 'apud 
 Aegyptum presbyteri consignant si praesens non sit episcopus.' 
 The reference here is to confirmation, not ordination. Moreover Ambrosiaster's 
 words do not involve that a presbyter could under any circumstances consecrate the 
 chrism. Didymus, who lived and taught at Alexandria and was Jerome's teacher, 
 says absolutely : eTri'ovcoTros fxoco? TJJ aviadev \aptTt reAtt TO xpioyjia (de Trin. ii. 13). 
 
 1 Haer. Ixix. i., cf. p. 325. Had he been acquainted with the supposed fact, it 
 probably would have appeared in his language against Aerius, which is referred to 
 later. It would have needed explanation : see pp. 147 f. 
 
 2 Athan. Apol. c. Ar. n, 12 (quoting from a synodical letter of Egyptian bishops): 
 oSro? Sf eorii' b 7roAu0pvAAT)TOS 'I^wpai, 6 fi^re turb nij? eVxArjcrias xeipOTOT)0ei <coi, 
 OTC roil? VJTO MeAeriov KaTaoTaOeiras 7rp<r/3uTe'povs "AAe'favSpos eSe'xero, /urjSc cKciVoic 
 <rvvapi8/mT)0eiV OVTWS ovSe exeiOev Kareorafij). Jroflev ovv irpe<7/3vrepos 'I<rxvpa? ;
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 127 
 
 which could have been used if there had been an 
 appeal in the matter to any ancient tradition of the 
 Church. Moreover, it appears from another docu- 
 ment quoted by Athanasius that Colluthus did not 
 profess to ordain as a presbyter, but pretended to be 
 a bishop. 1 
 
 The language and silence of Origen are also sig- 
 nificant. Origen was thirty-eight years old when 
 Heraclas became bishop, in whose time the gradual 
 exaltation of the episcopate is supposed to have 
 begun. Origen, besides giving us to understand 
 that the method of ordaining bishops was by laying 
 on of hands, 2 also speaks of them frequently as 
 occupying a quite different grade to presbyters, and 
 he uses language which implies that the position of 
 bishops was one of immemorial antiquity. 3 It must 
 
 TiVos (caTO(mjcravTOS ; apa KoAAovflou ; TOVTO yap \oiirov. aAA' on KoA 
 7rpe<r/3vTepo S>v eTeAiTT)<rf, (tat Tto.ua. x^P avrov ytyovev oueupo? Kal TraWes oi Trap' 
 avrou KaTaaraflcVres tv r<a o^iVfiare. Aaticot yfyovayi ical oinia owayoirou, o'ijAoi', 
 ical oiiSevi Ka8f<m)Kev afj.<fii^o\oi'. Cf. 74 (and 76) : ovfie'irore Aeiroupybs TTJS fKK\ri<rtas 
 yeyovev . . . eKireaiav Kal TTJS \f/evSovs virovoia? TOV irpe<7/3uTept'ov. 
 
 1 SeeAfloI. c. Art. c. 76 (quoting Letter of Mareotic clergy, A.D. 335, to civil authori- 
 ties) : into yap KoAAouflov rov 7rpe(7/3uTe'pou <f>avra<r9evros ejrrco7rr)v, ical vtrrepov 
 VJTO (coiiTJs (rvvoSov 'Ocriov al riav aiiv a\n<a emtncoiriov KeAevSeVros irpccrjSvTepoi' 
 eti/at KoOb Kal Trporepov Ijv, <eaTeoT<i07). 
 
 2 When Origen {in Num. xxii. 4) is rebuking the ' principes ecclesiae ' (i.e 
 bishops) for appointing their own relations or even their sons to succeed them in 
 their sees, he quotes Num. xxvii. 18-20 (where Moses is directed to choose Joshua 
 and lay hands upon him, etc.) and continues : ' audis evidenter ordinationem principis 
 populi tarn manifesto descriptam, ut paene expositione non egeat.' Just above he 
 had distinguished the 'princeps populi' from the 'presbyteri' of Num. xi. 16. Cf. 
 also in Exod. xi. 6. 
 
 3 Origen's language about church offices is of this nature : 
 
 (1) Bishops and presbyters are classed together as Ta? jrpwroicafleSpi'as irewioTevfie'i'oi 
 or ev ec<cAi}<naoTiiq7 Sofcouvre? eti/at virepoxfl (? n Matt. xvi. 22, in loann, xxxii. 7). 
 But it should be noticed that deacons also are included under these phrases in in 
 Matt. xiv. 22. (So later Bp. Dionysius Alex, speaks of ' my fellow-presbyter ' af. 
 Euseb. H.E. vii. u). 
 
 (2) Much more frequently they are spoken of as constituting distinct classes ; cf. 
 in Luc. xx : 'Si lesus subiicitur Joseph et Mariae, ego non subticiar episcopo qui 
 mihi a Deo ordinatus est pater? Non subiiciar presbytero qui mihi Domini digna- 
 tione praepositus est?' Again, in the beautiful contrast which he draws (c. Cels. iii. 
 30) between the Christian and the pagan CKKA7)<rca, he distinguishes the ap\<av of the 
 Christian community from the /SouAevroi the bishop from the presbyters in several
 
 128 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 also be remembered that Origen had suffered severely 
 from specially episcopal authority at Alexandria. 
 He had been ordained presbyter, as is well known, 
 at Caesarea, without the consent of Demetrius, the 
 bishop of Alexandria. Now, while a mixed synod of 
 Egyptian bishops and presbyters had consented only 
 to banish him for this breach of canonical discipline, 
 a synod of bishops alone had gone further and deposed 
 him from his presbyterate, as he and his friends 
 thought, unjustly. 1 This severer treatment would 
 make him quick, like Jerome, to notice the arrogance 
 of bishops. 2 If then Heraclas, Demetrius' successor, 
 had deprived the presbyters of an ancient right, it 
 would not have escaped his attention ; yet, writing 
 at the end of Heraclas' episcopate, he characterizes 
 the Alexandrian Church among others as 'a mild 
 
 typical Churches, of which Alexandria is one. Again, speaking (de Orat. 28) of the 
 different ' debts ' which different classes of the community have to pay, he specifies 
 the distinct debt of widow, deacon, presbyter, and continues : KOI firia-Korrov 6e 
 6(J>eiArj /Sapvranj aTraiTOUjAe'i/r; VTTO rov TTJS SArjs KK\r)<rias (ramjpos KCU tx6iKov/ifVr; el 
 fir) oTrofii&pTo. And in a similar strain in lerem. xi. 3 : ov iravr<a<; 6 K\i]po<; <r<i>cjei 
 . . . irXetov yw ajraiTOv/iai irapa rov SLO.KOVOV (this was after he was ordained priest), 
 irXetoi/ 6 Sidicovos irapa. rov AaixoV 6 fie riji' iravriav Vj/j-wf eyKe^eipicr/xtVos apxyv 
 aiiTTfv rrfv eccAT;<7ia<7Ti(c})>' eri irAeiov oTraiTetrat. Cf. in Ezech. v ; in Luc. xvii. 
 
 (3) He puts the bishops alone in a remarkable way, as the Church's rulers : ' per 
 singulas ecclesias bini sunt episcopi, alius visibilis, alius invisibilis ; ille visui carnis, 
 hie sensui patens' (in Luc. xiii). He is alluding to the Angel of the Apocalypse, 
 whom he conceives of as the spiritual guardian of the Church and counterpart of 
 the earthly bishop. This leads to the remark that 
 
 (4) He conceives the bishop of his day to be the bishop of whose qualifications St. 
 Paul instructs us (in Matt. xi. 15, xiv. 22 ; c. Cels. iii. 48). Also he speaks of 
 bishops as the immemorial tradition in the Church ; he speaks of people who have to 
 boast of fathers and ancestors irpoeptas qf iup.cVoit fv TJJ e<c(cAT)<ri'^ fni.tTKOiri.KOv 6poi>ov 
 i) irpea-fivTepiov TI/XTJS 7) Siaxoi/t'af ei TOV \aov (in Matt. xv. 26). And as he singles 
 out ' stability ' as a note of the Church, when he is contrasting it with the pagan 
 societies (c. Cels. iii. 30 : irpaela TIS ical evoTa&js) and this when Alexandria is 
 specially mentioned among other Churches he is clearly not conscious of any change 
 in the Church's constitution which is going on. Nor does his language at all suggest 
 that the episcopate of Alexandria was in a peculiar position. 
 
 1 See p. 328. Cf. Did. Chr. Biog. s. v. ORIGEN iv. p. 100. 
 
 2 He does, as a fact, rebuke the bishops, especially those of great cities, for 
 covetousness, secularity and pride, but not as if their order was at the moment 
 exalting itself at the expense of the presbyters ; cf. in Matt. xvi. 2, in Exod. xi. 6. 
 (Bishops will hardly condescend to take counsel with the inferior priests.)
 
 Hi.] The Witness of Church History. 129 
 
 and stable ' society, and speaks of want of zeal, not 
 of rivalry, as the fault likely to be found in bishops 
 and clergy. 1 So far then as Jerome's theory postu- 
 lates at Alexandria an original lack of clear distinc- 
 tion between the orders of bishop and presbyter, 
 followed by a gradual exaltation of the episcopate, 
 during the period of Origen's life, it has all the 
 testimony of his language against it. 2 
 
 It requires, then, a great effort of confidence to (<o if true, is 
 
 _ ,. -111 i not: i ncon - 
 
 trust Jeromes witness, especially when we consider sistent with 
 that it is the witness of Jerome in a temper, and thatofsucces- 
 under such circumstances he is not too careful with S1C 
 his facts ; but it has been so generally accepted by 
 western writers from the fourth to the twelfth 
 century and by modern critics, that it will be the 
 better course, as our object is not merely archaeo- 
 logical, to face what is at any rate the possibility of 
 its being true. It should then be noticed that, when 
 western church writers of the Middle Ages quote and 
 accept Jerome's statement, it causes them no dis- 
 quietude in view of the existing distinction of bishops 
 and priests. They would maintain that no one can 
 validly execute any ecclesiastical function which does 
 not belong to him by the proper devolution of ecclesi- 
 astical authority. But this no one accuses the Alex- 
 
 1 c. Cels. iii. 30. 
 
 2 So far again as Jerome's words postulate that the elective authority for the epi- 
 scopate lay simply with the presbytery, it has against it the evidence that the ancient 
 mode of episcopal election at Alexandria gave great power to the vote of the whole 
 people. See Athan. Apol. c. Ar. 6 -nav TO jrArjOos (to! was 6 Aaos and Greg. Naz. 
 Orat. xxi. 8, who praises this as the ancient and apostolic method. 
 
 Liberatus (cir. 560) tells us of a curious custom in the episcopal succession at 
 Alexandria (Breviar. 20) : ' Consuetude quidem est Alexandriae ilium qui defuncto 
 succedit excubias super defuncti corpus agere, manumque dexteram eius capiti suo 
 imponere et, sepulto manibus suis, accipere collo suo beati Marci pallium et tune 
 legitime sedere.' But he cannot mean that this was a substitute for consecration by 
 living bishops. We know that Stress was laid in Athanasius' case (326) both on 
 popular election and public episcopal consecration : and the latter could not have 
 been abandoned later. 
 
 I
 
 130 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 andrian presbyters of having done. They were 
 ordained, ex hypothesi, on the understanding that 
 under certain circumstances they might be called, 
 by simple election, to execute the bishop's office. 
 They were not only presbyters with the ordinary 
 commission of the presbyter, but also bishops in 
 posset Elsewhere there were two distinct ordina- 
 tions, one making a man a bishop and another a 
 presbyter ; at Alexandria there was only one ordina- 
 tion, which made a man a presbyter and potential 
 bishop. When this arrangement ceased and Alex- 
 andria was assimilated to other Churches, the pres- 
 byters began to be ordained as mere presbyters ; 
 and henceforward any assumption by one of them 
 of episcopal powers, such as Colluthus was guilty of, 
 was treated as a mere assumption, the results of 
 which were simply invalid. It is unnecessary to do 
 more than recall, in view of such an hypothetical 
 situation, the contention of the last chapter, namely 
 that the church principle of succession would never 
 be violated by the existence in any Church of epi- 
 scopal powers, whether free or conditional, in all the 
 presbyters, supposing that those powers were not 
 assumed by the individual for himself, but were 
 understood to be conveyed to him by the ordination 
 of the Church. The state of things, then, which is 
 assumed to have existed at Alexandria violates the 
 complete uniformity of the church ministry in the 
 period we are considering it requires us to introduce 
 qualifications into our generalization of results but 
 it does not affect the principle. 2 
 
 1 Their position would not have been very unlike that of the chorepiscopi, who 
 could only ordain validly (in the mind of the early Church) where they had the 
 sanction of the town bishop. 
 
 2 See Simcox Early Church History p. 359 n. 1 .
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 131 
 
 So far we have been going through the evidence Further 
 supplied by the history of Eastern Christianity otitohmrtfce 
 
 , .. ... .. ministry was 
 
 the existence of episcopal successions in every conceived 
 Church. It remains to seek additional light on the 
 conception entertained of the ministry; and that 
 from three sources 
 
 (1) writings which are concerned with worship and 
 
 church order : 
 
 (2) the canons of councils : 
 
 (3) some representative Fathers. 
 
 (i) Besides the oriental offices of ordination, of (0 Liturgies, 
 ancient though uncertain date, 1 and some mediaeval 
 commentaries on the ancient rites, such as that of 
 Symeon of Thessalonica, we have older sources of 
 evidence. There is the work of the Syrian pseudo- 
 Dionysius, On the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy^ a work 
 probably of the end of the fifth century, elaborating 
 the mystical significance of the Church's orders ; and 
 more ancient are the recently discovered Prayers of 
 Bishop Serapion of Thmuis (c. 350), a friend of St. 
 Athanasius, among which are prayers for ordinations, 
 or ' layings on of hands ' ; 2 and the Syrian Apostolical 
 Constitutions? a work which in its present form is 
 probably contemporary with Serapion, but which, in 
 the portion which concerns us, is based upon the 
 earlier Egyptian Church Ordinances, and those again 
 upon the so-called Canons of Hippolytus, which may 
 perhaps be the work of the famous man whose name 
 they bear, but at any rate must be held to be a 
 body of canons not later than the beginning of the 
 
 1 Given in Morinus de S. Ord. p. ii. and see App. Note C. 
 
 3 See Texte u. Untersuch. ii. 3. b. (Leipzig) 1899, and Bishop Sarapion's Prayer 
 Book, by John Wordsworth, D.D?, Bishop of Salisbury S.P.C.K., 1899). 
 
 3 On their date and character see Lightfoot Ignatius i. p. 253, and Brightinan 
 Liturgies Eastern and Western (Oxford, 1896) i. p. xvii.
 
 132 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 third century and of Roman origin. 1 Though of 
 Roman origin, however, they belong to the Roman 
 Church before it had ceased to use the Greek lan- 
 guage ; and, as they lie at the basis of the Greek 
 ritual of ordination, they may most fitly be con- 
 s j^ ere( j h ere xhe portions which concern us run 
 thus in the surviving versions : 
 
 'Let the bishop be chosen from [probably "by"] all the people. 
 Let him be "orderly," as is written of him in the apostle. 2 In the 
 same week 3 in which he is ordained, let the people say "We choose 
 him." Then when all the people are silent, after the confession, 4 let 
 them all pray for him, saying : " Oh God, strengthen this man whom 
 Thou hast prepared for us. " Afterwards let one be chosen from among 
 the bishops and the presbyters 5 to lay his hand upon his head and pray, 
 saying : "Oh God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of 
 mercies and the God of all consolations, who dwelleth [? dwellest] in 
 the holy place, and hath respect unto the humble, who knoweth all 
 things before they come to pass, who hast established the bounds (or 
 ' laws ') of Thy Church, by whose injunction it cometh about that a 
 holy race should be maintained from Adam . . . 6 who hath established 7 
 rulers and princes : do Thou now look upon N. thy servant, giving to 
 him Thy power and the effectual Spirit ; which Thou didst give to Thy 
 holy Apostles through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thine only Son, to those 
 
 1 Brightman I.e. p. xxiii. They exist only in Arabic and Ethiopia versions, 
 themselves translated from Coptic versions of the original Greek. They have been 
 recently brought into fresh notice by Achelis Texte u. Untersuch. vi. 4, Die Canones 
 Hippolyti: see also A. C. Headlam in the Guardian for 1896, pt. i. pp. 243, 699. 
 The conclusion as to their date is that of Duchesne and Batiffol as well as the critics 
 just mentioned. I have translated Achelis' Latin version of the Arabic. 
 
 2 i Tim. iii. 2. 
 
 3 It is suggested that 'on the same Sunday ' should be read. The ceremony in 
 that case would begin with a formal presentation of the chosen bishop to the people 
 and their public acceptance of him. 
 
 4 This reminds us of the Didache xiv. i. See p. 377 n. 2 . 
 
 5 This expression is of uncertain meaning. But we must not translate ' bishops 
 or presbyters,' for we read later ' the power of ordination is not given to the 
 presbyters.' I venture to think the original must have meant, Met one of the 
 bishops and one of the presbyters be chosen to lay on hands and pray.' 
 
 ' The text runs on ' rations huius episcopi qui est magnus Abraham.' This gives 
 no sense ; the later rites commemorate how God has always maintained 'rulers 
 and priests in His holy people (making mention of Abraham with others) and ' never 
 left His sanctuary without a ministry.' 
 
 ' All these verbs in the 3rd person should probably be in the 2nd as ' hast estab- 
 lished ' is.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 133 
 
 who founded the Church in every place, to the honour and glory of 
 Thy holy name. Because Thou knowest the heart of each one, grant 
 to him that, without sin, he may behold (?) Thy people, that he may 
 be worthy to feed Thy great [and] holy flock. Make his way of life also 
 to be more holy than that of all the people without any lapse. Make 
 him to be emulated 1 of all for his excellence, and receive his prayers 
 and oblations which he shall offer to Thee day and night, and let them 
 be to Thee a sweet savour. Grant to him also, O Lord, the office of 
 a bishop and a spirit of gentleness, and power to forgive sins : and 
 give to him authority (or 'ability') to loose all the chains of the 
 iniquity of evil spirits, and to heal all diseases, and bruise Satan under 
 his feet quickly, through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom be 
 glory to Thee with Him and the Holy Spirit for ever and ever. Amen. " 
 After that let them all turn to him the newly-made bishop giving 
 him the kiss of peace, for he deserves this. And let the deacon bring 
 the oblations, and let him who has been made bishop lay his hand on 
 the oblations with the presbyters, saying : " The Lord be with you all.'" 
 Then after the reply ' And with thy Spirit,' and the Sursum Corda, 
 he is to continue the celebration of the eucharist to the end. And he 
 is to bless the oil (if there be any) and the offerings of food and fruits 
 of the earth. 2 
 
 ' But if a presbyter is ordained, everything shall be done with him 
 as with a bishop, except that he shall not take his seat upon the throne. 
 But the whole of the same prayer shall be prayed over him as over the 
 bishop, with the single exception of the name of the bishop's office. The 
 bishop is in all respects to be on the same level with the presbyter, 
 except in the matter of the throne and in ordination, for the power of 
 ordaining is not granted to him.' 
 
 Of the deacon we learn that he is to serve the 
 bishop and presbyter in all things, and not only at the 
 time of the eucharist, and also that he is to serve 
 the sick who have no helper, and inform the bishop 
 of their state that he may pray over them, and also 
 relieve their state, as likewise also that of other needy 
 folk. He too is to be ordained by the bishop with 
 a laying-on of hands and prayer to the effect that 
 he may be granted the Holy Spirit in the same 
 
 1 We may hope that this expression ' ut invideatur ' does not exactly represent the 
 Greek original probably fr)Aou<r0ai to be the object of zeal in others. 
 
 2 The bishop's primary functions are liturgical, and it is in the performance of these 
 that, at the date of the canons, his ' usurpatio juris ' consists : see Achelis p. 160.
 
 134 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 manner as was Stephen, and power effectually to use 
 the sign of the cross, with which he himself is signed, 
 against all the devices of Satan, and a blameless life, 
 and learning to lead many in the way of salvation in 
 the Church without offence. 1 
 
 Then follows the more peculiar canon 
 
 ' When any one is found worthy to stand before the tribunal for his 
 faith and to be sentenced to punishment for Christ's sake, and is after- 
 wards pardoned and let go free, such an one forthwith is worthy of the 
 rank of presbyter before God, not in virtue of ordination by the bishop. 
 Rather his confession is his ordination. But if he become a bishop, let 
 him be ordained. If any one has confessed but not been tortured, he 
 is worthy of the presbyterate, but he must be ordained. If one who 
 was a slave to another man has endured tortures for Christ's sake, he 
 too is a presbyter to the flock. He has received the spirit of the 
 presbyterate without the form ; let the bishop therefore leave out the 
 part of the prayer which refers to the Holy Spirit.' 
 
 That is to say : one who has been tortured for the 
 faith a martyr in will is to rank as a presbyter 
 without further ordination, but only if he is a free- 
 man. If he was a slave he is to be ordained (with a 
 certain omission). Confession, without torture, does 
 not exempt from ordination to the presbyterate but 
 qualifies for it. 2 
 
 Now these canons and prayers are very remarkable. 
 We notice that though the bishop is at present but 
 very little differentiated from the presbyter in other 
 respects, yet the difference is none the less marked 
 in the single matter of the power to ordain. He only 
 can ordain to the several orders, though probably a 
 presbyter is to assist in the laying-on of hands in the 
 
 1 cc. i.-v. 
 
 2 c. vi. The Latin (which I have not cited hitherto as it is so far from the original) 
 runs, 'quando quis dignus est qui stet coram tribunal! propter fidem et afficiatur paena 
 propter Christum, postea autem indulgentia liber dimittitur, talis postea meretur 
 gradum presbyteralem coram Deo, non secundum ordinationem quae fit ab episcopo. 
 Immo confessio est ordinatio eius. Quodsi vero episcopus fit, ordinetur.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 135 
 
 case of a bishop, as Timothy was ordained by St. 
 Paul, but also 'with the laying-on of the hands of 
 the presbytery.' Of course the bishop came, in course 
 of time, to occupy a much more distinctive position, 
 but in one sense we should notice that what succeed- 
 ing ages witnessed was the evolution of the presbyter 
 rather than of the bishop, for in the age represented 
 by these canons, the presbyter is in fact a very sub- 
 ordinate official so long as the bishop is present who 
 is the normal pastor. 1 He can hardly have been 
 as essential to the community as the deacon. ' It is 
 the bishop who normally, at any rate, celebrates the 
 eucharist, it is the bishop who distributes the offer- 
 ings and gifts to the poor ; although the presbyters 
 have a part in the baptismal service, it is the bishop 
 to whom those to be baptized make their confession 
 or profession, 2 who consecrates the oil with which 
 the presbyter anoints them, who lays his hands on 
 them with prayer for the reception of the Holy 
 Spirit when they have been baptized. The bishop 
 is clearly the centre and life and head of all authority 
 in the community,' 3 its chief celebrant as well as 
 ruler. 
 
 And this is the position in which we shall indis- 
 putably find the bishop when we look back to the 
 letters of Ignatius at the very beginning of the 
 second century. Later we find a process of decen- 
 tralization going on in the East, and much more 
 in the West, which resulted in the presbyter gaining 
 a more independent and influential ministry. 4 
 
 1 In the bishop's absence, however, he takes his place (c. xxxiv.) at the love-feast 
 and doubtless at the altar also. 
 
 - c. xix. ' tune confiteatur epistopo huic enim soli de ipso est impositum onus.' 
 
 3 Headlam i.e. p. 991. 
 
 4 e.g. at Alexandria in the 4th century there were 'parish priests' in the later 
 sense.
 
 1 36 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 But what it concerns us specially to notice in this 
 enquiry is, that neither the evolution of the distinctive 
 office of the presbyter, nor the elevation of the bishop 
 above his presbyters affected, as far as our evidence 
 goes, that substantial point of distinction between 
 the two offices, ' that the power of ordination is not 
 granted to the presbyter.' This is to the author of 
 the canons, and this is still to Jerome and Chry- 
 sostom, 1 the one point of difference. 
 
 It was no doubt the fact that in the period when 
 these canons were composed, the presbyterate was, 
 under normal circumstances, rather a position of 
 dignity than an administrative or liturgical office, 
 which accounts for the rule that the will for 
 martyrdom on the part of a free man (though not 
 of a slave) that is, confessorship with endurance of 
 torture is, without further ordination, to constitute 
 him a presbyter. What exactly this means, or 
 exactly what powers would be included in it, we 
 cannot determine. But it is, no doubt, because the 
 presbyterate is rather the ecclesiastical dignity, and 
 the episcopate the ecclesiastical office, that martyr- 
 dom qualifies without more ado for the one, while 
 consecration is in any case required for the other. 
 And we must add that the canon belongs to the 
 period, the results of which appear in St. Cyprian's 
 episcopate, when there was a tendency so to rever- 
 ence the martyrs on whom God Himself had seemed 
 to set his seal and consecration, as to allow them 
 seriously to interfere with Church order and discipline. 
 The evil effect of this mistaken reverence is apparent 
 in the marked reversal of the language of this 
 
 l See pp. 147, 159.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 137 
 
 canon which appears in the later version of it in 
 the Apostolical Constitutions. 1 
 
 ' A confessor is not ordained f i. e. is not in the clergy], for confessor- 
 ship is a matter of will and endurance [not of ecclesiastical office]. But 
 he is worthy of great honour as having confessed the name of God and 
 His Christ before Gentiles and kings. But if there is need for him to 
 become bishop, or presbyter, or deacon, then he is ordained, But if 
 any confessor, not having been ordained, attempt to seize any such 
 dignity for himself, on the ground of his confession, let him be excom- 
 municated and expelled. For he is nothing, since he has denied the 
 ordinance of Christ, and is worse than an unbeliever.' 
 
 It is very interesting to watch the changes which 
 take place in other respects also as these canons 
 pass into the rules of the Egyptian Church Order, 
 and then into those for the Apostolical Constitutions. 
 The one bishop who, probably with the presbyter, 
 is to consecrate his fellow by laying-on of hands in 
 the canons becomes the three bishops of the Constitu- 
 tions, 2 and the ceremony appears of the laying of 
 the open book of the Gospels upon the head of him 
 who is being ordained. 3 The prayer becomes more 
 elaborate ; more specific allusion is made in it to the 
 power of ordaining others, ' of giving orders,' and, in 
 one text of the Constitutions, to the offering of the 
 eucharistic sacrifice 4 ' the pure and bloodless sacri- 
 fice, the mystery of the New Covenant.' There is 
 
 1 viii. 23. (It remains, however, substantially in the intermediate Egyptian Ch. 
 Ordin. See Achelis' Canones Hippolyti p. 68.) ' O/noAoyjj'njs ov xeiporoi/eiToi- 
 yviafitf; yap TOVTO coi virojuofi?? . . . cap Se \peia avrov fi t is firitTKOitov ij irpco'jSvrepoi' 
 TJ Sidxovov, xetpoTOveiTai' el ie TIS o/noXoy^nj? fit) \eiporovr)0els apTrdtrr) eavria 
 dftuj^a TL roiovTov <i)f Sia TTJI> bfj.o \oyiav, OUTOS xadaipcicrtiu xai diro/3aAAc'<T0w ov yap 
 itrrtv, eirei'n-ep rjpiojTai TTJV Xpiarov iidraf ii/ ai itrriv airurrov \tipuv. 
 
 2 The versions of the dg. Ch. O. vary. See Achelis I.e. pp. 40-1. 
 
 3 The laying-on of hands is not specially mentioned. See p. 352. The popular 
 election still remains. 
 
 * Though the fact that the newly-consecrated bishop immediately proceeds to 
 celebrate the Eucharist shows that this was, in the days of the Canons, regarded as 
 his most important function.
 
 138 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 also in the Constitutions a distinctive prayer for the 
 presbyter's ordination, recalling the appointment by 
 Moses of the elders to assist him in judgment, and 
 specifying among his functions ' priestly ministries * 
 on behalf of God's people.' But these changes are 
 not considerable. And the prayers of Bishop Serapion 
 for the laying-on of hands in the making of a 
 presbyter and of a bishop 'of the succession of 
 the holy apostles,' suggest as simple an idea of 
 these offices as the prayers in the canons of 
 Hippolytus. 2 
 
 More emphasis, however, is laid on sacerdotal 
 principles in the ' Constitutions ' generally than in 
 these ordinals. 
 
 General There is an intense insistence on the necessity for 
 
 theprie e st - ordination to qualify a man for any ministerial 
 work 3 : there is a reiterated magnifying of the office 
 of bishops, whether as priests ministering the obla- 
 tions of the new covenant, especially the eucharistic 
 sacrifice, 4 or as prophets and kings (' he is your king 
 
 1 Upovpyiai. Sacerdotal terminology, however, is not absent from the Canons. 
 The bishop is the ' high priest,' c. xxiv. See also c. xxxvi. 
 
 2 See below for Serapion's prayers, pp. 331 f. Nothing has been said of the re- 
 cognition of minor orders in these ordinals, for they do not fall within the purview of 
 this work, and throughout they are placed upon a quite different level to those of the 
 bishops, priests, and deacons, ordained by the Apostles. See Apost. Const, viii. 46. 
 Dionysius Areop. and Symeon of Thessalonica, ap. Morinus de S.O. p. ii. p. 129. 
 
 3 E.g. ii. 27 : His oiov Tf avdpiawov cavToi/ 619 iepiatnv^v eiripplitTfiv, /UT) Aaj36vra 
 TO du<j/u,a irapa (tpeiTTOvor, Kal iroielv ixflva. a. fjiovoif TOIS iepev<riv e^ea'Tiv. Cf. ii. 28, 
 iii. 10 : ovre AaiKot; ejrirpe'iro/xej' Trotetv TI TCOI/ lepanidov tpyior. It seems admitted 
 (viii. 46) that God's supernatural or miraculous call, as in the case of Ananias (Acts 
 ix.), dispenses with the necessity for human ordination. But cf. viii. 26 : an exorcist 
 with the gift of healing would require to be ordained to the regular ministry. 
 
 * E.g. ii. 25 : 'Yjnets oZv cnj/u.epoi', co ejriV(cojroi, tore TU> Aa<o v/j-Stv icpeis, \euirai, oi 
 AetTOVpyovvTes rfj i(p< <rKi\irfj, rf ayi'f Kal (cafloAiicjj eKKArjtrio, Kal irapefTTwre? 
 ria 6v<ria.<TTripi<a Kvpiou roO Oeov ri^iav Kal Trpocrayoi'Tes aura! ras Aoyticas ical avaifj-ax- 
 TOVS Svcrtas Sta 'Irjcrovrov pieyaAou apxiepew i/aeis TOI? tv vfilv \aiKots e<TT6 jrpo <j>rj- 
 rai, <ip\ovTfS *cal r;yoii/xei'0t ical /SaaiXet;, oi fieairai fleou Kal riav iriariav aurov, oi 
 fio\eis TOU Xdyov Kai ayye\Tr}pfs, ot yvtotrTat. riav ypa.$5>v Kal $Q6yyoi TOV Oeov Kai 
 fxaprvpe? TOU SeXjftaTO? aiiToC, ot iravrtov TO? o/napTi'as ()a.<rraovTfS ai 7Tpi iravriov 
 oiroXoyovj^evot. Cf. ii. 27, 28.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 139 
 
 and ruler,' nay more, ' he is your earthly God after 
 God' 1 ), or as mediators between God and His 
 people, 2 (he is, ' after God, your father, begetting you 
 to adoption through water and the Holy Ghost ') : 
 there is an emphatic distinction drawn between the 
 powers of a bishop and those of a presbyter 3 (' the 
 distinction of names is a distinction of realities' 
 specially, only a bishop can ordain) : there 
 is a strong and powerful assertion of the prin- 
 ciple of order : finally, there is a noticeable pass- 
 age on the apostolical succession, with special re- 
 ference to the perpetuating of the eucharistic 
 sacrifice. 
 
 ' Christ, the only-begotten, was the first high priest by His Nature, 
 not having snatched the honour for Himself, but being appointed by 
 the Father ; who became man for us, and, when offering His spiritual 
 sacrifice to His God and Father before His passion, appointed us * 
 only to do this, though there were with us others too who had believed 
 on Him but a believer did not, as such, become a priest or obtain the 
 high priestly honour and after His assumption, we, having offered 
 
 1 ii. 26 '. OCros o.p\tav cou ^yov/icvo? vjuuc. OVTOS V/JMV j3ao"tAevs KOU 
 OVTOS v/xcov eiriyeios Cebs /xcra 6e6v os 6<eiAei TTJS wap" vju.wi' Ttfirjs airoXavciv. wept 
 yap TOVTOV Kal TUP onoiiav ar-ros 6 Sebs eAeyev'. 'Eyu etira 0eoi e<rre teat viol vi//t<r- 
 rov iraircf, at Qeou? ov KaKoAoyrja-f is 6 yap ciri'oxuiro; irpoKa.6eecr8u> vftjav <os 
 0eoO af 10 TeTi/iTjueVos, ]7 Kparet rov KArjpou Kal rov Aaou TTOITOS ap^ct. Cf. ii. 33. 
 This is surely rather overstrained language. 
 
 - ii. 25, 26 : The bishop is /ie<ri'n)s fleov al vfiuv v rait wpb aiiToi' karpeuut 
 ovros /xera Btov irarTjp vfiiav, Si' V&O.TOS ital m/eu^iaTOS apayevi^cras v^ 
 
 /^ov ei av, eyai a^fitpoi' yeye'ia^Ka <re. 
 
 3 viii. 46 : *I<rre yap iravTio? e7rto"edirov5 irap* r/fiCii' opOftairfleWas at irpta- 
 /SuTt'povs <cal Stajcopovs evx77 <ta <' X 6 '?''"' *iriflri, Tif Siaijopa' rwi' opo/iaTwi' KOI rJiv 
 6ia({)Opat' TWP Trpa.yiJLa.Tiov &eiKVvovra.r ov yap 6 ^ovAdfievo? irap' TJJUU/ e A^pov TJ)' 
 ^ctpa, utinrep firi nis ij35^Aou TUP Sa/naAeu)i< eirt TOV 'lepo^oaft irapaxeicofif 
 iepaio-vi^is, aAA" o KaAovMf "Os virb" TOV fltov. iii. 10 : Ovie eTTiTptVo/iep irptcr^vT 
 Xtporoveiv. viii. 46 : 'Exeii/o KOII^J irarre? irapayye'AAo/ity, a<rro' efj./j.(vtiv 
 
 T)J SoOeiVj} tivTta teal fiij virfpftaCvciv TOVS opov;. 
 
 4 The Apostles are supposed to be the speakers.
 
 140 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 according to His commandment a pure and bloodless sacrifice, ap- 
 pointed bishops and presbyters and deacons, seven in number.' 1 
 
 The later writings to which we have alluded are 
 without the exaggerated tone which sometimes 
 appears in the Constitutions, and the thoughts con- 
 nected with the various ordinations are often of 
 great moral beauty and interest. It is tempting to 
 dwell upon them. 2 But, in spite of certain differ- 
 ences, the whole literature is pervaded by the same 
 principles and it has been better for our purpose 
 to exhibit them as they appear in the earliest 
 documents. 
 
 ( 2 ) Canons of (2) What is the witness of oriental councils ? It 
 is very slight. For, as the principle of the ministry 
 was little opposed, it was as little contended for ; 
 and it is not till the fourth century that we begin to 
 have the canons of councils. The canonical literature 
 is occupied a good deal with clerical discipline, and 
 the distinctive powers of bishops, priests, and deacons 
 are throughout assumed and guarded. The earliest 
 
 A.D. 314. recorded canons are those of Ancyra. The council 
 held here was of the nature of a ' general council ' of 
 the Churches of Asia Minor and Syria, ' to heal the 
 wounds inflicted on the Church by the persecution 
 under Maximin.' 3 The language of its twenty-five 
 canons implies throughout the threefold ministry : 
 there is the general government of the bishop, 4 the 
 
 1 viii. 46 : UpwTOS Toivvv TJJ tf>v<rei ap^iepcv; 6 fioi/oyevrjs Xpioros, ov^ favria 
 TTIV TtjUTjv apjraaas, aAAa irapa TOU Harpo? KaTaorafleiV os yevo/JLfvos avdpiairos Si' 
 Tj^a; (tai rtfv wvfVii.aTi.Kijv (hiaiav n-pocr^epup TCO 9e<j> auToC Kal jrarpt Trpb TOU iraflous, 
 Vj/jui' SterafaTO fxopoit TOUTO rroifiv, (cairoi dvriav <ruv r)l*.lv Kal erepiav TWP eiy aiirbv 
 ireirKTTfVKOTiav a\V ov jrai/rtos 6 7rrreu<7or f/Sri Kal iepev; xareon) J) apxiepoTKC^j 
 aft'as ITUX*' fitra Se -ri}v ivAkiffyiv OVTOV rineif, irpoveveyicovTes Kara. TIJP StaTafiy 
 avrov 0v(Tiav KaSapai' Kal arai^aKTOv, 7rpoe^6ipi(ra^ieda C7rK7XO7rov9 Kal TrpetrjSvre'povt 
 Kal SiaKovovf firra TOV api.9ii.6v. 
 
 2 Some of the chief passages are quoted in App. Note C. 
 
 3 Hefele Conciliengesch. 16. 
 
 4 Cc. 2, 3, 10, 15. The clergy in general (c. 3) constitute a rots.
 
 III.] Tlie Witness of Church History. 141 
 
 priestly ministration of the presbyters, 1 and the 
 assistant ministry of the deacons. 2 The thirteenth 
 canon has been much quoted as (implicitly) giving 
 not only country bishops but also town presbyters a 
 power to ordain, with the leave of the bishop of each 
 diocese ; but the canon is very obscure and the 
 reading which would give this meaning is not the 
 best supported in the MSS. and versions. The more 
 probable reading may be best translated : ' Country 
 bishops may not ordain [country] presbyters or 
 deacons, no nor town presbyters either, without the 
 written permission of the bishop, in another diocese ' 
 [or better ' in each diocese ']. 3 It has been men- 
 tioned already that a council at Alexandria (A.D. 
 324) declared the man who had been ordained by a 
 presbyter to be a mere layman. The great Council A.D. 325. 
 of Nicaea, among other canons, 4 prohibits deacons 
 ' who have no power to offer ' from ' giving the body 
 of Christ to the presbyters ' who have the sacrificial 
 authority ; 5 it also sternly rebukes a practice, which 
 
 1 C. i : presbyters TTJS Tt/nijs rijs Kara T)JV KaOeSpav p.eTexov<riv ', their functions are 
 rpO(r<epeii'. ojiiAeu-, Acirovpycti' TOL? iepaTiicds Aeiroupyias. 
 
 2 C. 2 : -fi iepa Acirovpyui, ^ TOW apror T) iro-njptov avaififpeiv i.e. either the 
 presenting the oblation to the presbyter who ' offers ' (irpoox^c'pct, c. i ; cf. the use 
 of avo.if>ep(.v in the account of the ordination of a bishop, Apost. Const, viii. 5) : or 
 the communicating the people (see below, Can. Nicaen. 18). 
 
 3 On this see App. Note D. There were ' country priests ' as well as ' country 
 bishops.' Each class, having in some sense the same powers as the corresponding 
 class of the town, had limited rights in the exercise of them. Thus only on an 
 emergency could country priests celebrate in the town church (Can. Neo-Caes. 13) ; 
 on the other hand country bishops could ' offer ' in the town freely (Can. Neo-Caes. 14), 
 but not ordain at all without special permission. (So Ancyra c. 13 if exacrnj be 
 read and cf. p. 338). The council of Neo-Caesarea was almost contemporary with 
 that of Ancyra. It may be mentioned that the canons of Neo-Caesarea mention a 
 current idea that the imposition of hands in ordination carried with it the absolution 
 from all sins except carnal ones. 
 
 * The legislation about the metropolitan sees, i.e. the distinction of rank amongst 
 bishops, does not here concern us. Notice will hereafter be taken of the absence of 
 clear distinction between a valid and a canonical ordination. 
 
 5 C. 18 (itpoa^ifpfiv, SMvai TO fftofia TOV xpurrov); cf. Can. Laodic. 19. The 
 practice here rebuked, of deacons communicating presbyters, may have some analogy 
 with the western custom, which gave the deacons an independent authority to
 
 142 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 had come to the ears of the Fathers, of deacons com- 
 municating even before bishops. 'Let all these 
 things, then,' the canon concludes, ' be done away, 
 and let the deacons remain within their proper limits, 
 knowing that they are the servants of the bishop 
 and inferior to the presbyters : and let them take the 
 Eucharist according to their rank after the presbyters, 
 when it is given them either by the bishop or the 
 presbyter. And deacons must not even sit down in 
 the midst of the presbyters, for this is contrary to 
 rule [canon] and order. And if any one will not 
 obey, even after these regulations, let him be deposed 
 from his diaconate.' At Nicaea, and in the synods 
 which followed, we have a great multitude of canons 
 bearing on clerical discipline insisting on clergy 
 passing gradually through the various grades of the 
 hierarchy, prohibiting their passing from one diocese 
 to another, limiting their respective rights, regulating 
 the gradations of rank but nothing more that 
 concerns our present purpose. 
 ( 3 ) Greek (3) What is the witness of the Greek Fathers? 
 
 Fathers. T-, /. 
 
 znd century. The powerful testimony of Ignatius to the divine and 
 exclusive authority of the bishop, as in each com- 
 munity the sole source of government and ministry, 
 falls outside the period now under consideration and 
 will be taken account of later. In the Clementines 
 we have found a theory of the functions of the three- 
 minister the consecrated elements. ' As the consecration belongs to the priest, so 
 the dispensation of the sacrament belongs to the minister (deacon) . . . the former 
 sanctifies the oblations, the latter dispenses them when they are sanctified. More- 
 over, the priests themselves are not allowed for fear of presumption to take the 
 chalice from the Lord's table, unless it have been given them by the deacon.' Thus 
 ' without deacons a priest has his name but not his office.' This comes from Isidore 
 of Spain de Eccl. Off. ii. 8 (ap. Hittorp. p. 23) ; it is repeated by Rabanus Maurus 
 de Inst. Cler. \. 7 (ap. Hittorp. p. 316), and Ivo, bishop of Carnot (ap. Hittorp. 
 p. 472). At the some time the deacon's ' ministerium ' is carefully distinguished 
 from the priesthood. Cf. Can. Ancyr. 2.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 143 
 
 fold ministry, in which the bishop has the supreme 
 administration and the authority to bind and 
 loose, but in which his teaching authority, as the 
 successor to the ' chair of the apostle,' or ' the chair 
 of Christ,' the great Prophet, is mainly emphasized. 1 
 Clement of Alexandria says but little of the ministry, 
 as we have seen, but speaks of its three orders as 
 representing ascending grades of spiritual dignity. 
 
 In the third century almost all that we get on the srd century, 
 theory of the ministry 2 in the East consists of scat- 
 tered references in the writings of Origen. To him 
 the ministry not only represents the divine authority 
 of government, but is a priesthood, after the analogy 
 of the Mosaic, and in application of the one priest- 
 hood of Christ. 3 
 
 1 See p. 118 n. 1 . It must be remembered that the Clementines are more or less 
 Ebionite. 
 
 2 It should, however, be said that Firmilian of Caesarea, one of the most distin- 
 guished bishops of the third century, in his letter in reply to Cyprian, A.D. 256 (ap. 
 Cypr. Ep. Ixxv), reproduces all Cyprian's language about the episcopate. See 16 : 
 ' Potestas ergo peccatorum remittendorum apostolis data est et ecclesiis quas illi a 
 Christo missi constituerunt et episcopis qui eis ordinatione vicaria successerunt. 
 17 : ' Stephanus se successionem Petri tenere contendit.' It maybe noticed that he 
 speaks of bishops as presbyters : ' quando omnis potestas et gratia in ecclesia con- 
 stituta sit, ubi praesident maiores natu [Le. oi irpeo-jSurepoi] qui et baptizandi et 
 manum imponendi et ordinandi possident potestatem ' ( 7) : yet he also ( 8) specifies 
 bishops as claiming to give the Holy Ghost by laying on of hands : ' ut hi quidem 
 [i.e. episcopi qui nunc] possint per solam manus impositionem venientibus haereticis 
 dare Spiritum sanctum.' Cf. 4: ' seniores et praepositi.' The word ' presbyter ' 
 could still be used in such a sense as to cover the bishops. This letter must have 
 been translated by Cyprian. The traces of a Greek original, however, are plain ; see 
 Diet. Chr. Biog. s. v. CYPRIAN i. p. 751 n. 1 . We can hardly be wrong so far in con- 
 cluding that Firmilian accepted and repeated Cyprian's language about the episco- 
 pate, though he uses presbyter in a sense which leads to Cyprian translating it 
 into maior natu. 
 
 3 See in Levit. v. 3 : Christ is the only sacrifice and the only priest ; but He has 
 given His priesthood to His Church ; ' consequens est ut secundum imaginem eius 
 qui sacerdotium ecclesiae dedit, etiam ministri et sacerdotes ecclesiae peccata populi 
 accipiant, et ipsi imitantes magistrum, remissionem peccatorum populo tribuant.' 
 The priests who preside in the Church are said repropitiare ilelic ta ( 4), but 
 this is explained of the moral process by which they bring men back to God. There 
 are strong exhortations to confession, which is to be private or public at the con- 
 fessor's discretion, in Psalm, xxxvii. 6, horn. ii. ; in Levit. ii. 4. 
 
 It should be mentioned at the same time that Origen seems to say that the un-
 
 144 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 4 th century. J n the fourth century the body of testimony grows 
 with the mass of writings. There is, to quote some 
 
 Athanasius. examples, the beautiful letter of Athanasius to 
 Dracontius. Dracontius was a monk, who had been 
 elected to a bishopric close to Alexandria and had 
 received the ' grace of the episcopate,' but afterwards, 
 moved by various fears, fled into concealment and 
 left his high charge. Athanasius endeavours to recall 
 him to his duty, in part by reminding him of monks 
 who have made good bishops, but principally by re- 
 calling to his mind the dignity of the episcopate 
 as instituted by Christ through His Apostles and 
 having, therefore, not merely the authority of the 
 Church but the authority of Christ Himself, and as 
 being the essential condition of the continuous life 
 of the Church and the handing down of grace ; by 
 reminding him also that he has received an actual 
 grace in his ordination as real as the grace of baptism, 
 for which he will be in any case responsible. 1 
 
 There is a temptation to dwell on the spiritual 
 beauty and power which is put into the patristic 
 conception of the ministry. When is Gregory of 
 
 worthiness of the minister does affect the spiritual validity of his ministrations ; cf. in 
 Levit. v. 12 : the unworthy priest 'non est sacerdos nee potest sacerdos nominari.' 
 See Bigg B.L. p. 215 f. 
 
 We have quoted from Origen above (p. 127 n.3) on the three-fold ministry. 
 
 1 Rp. ad Dracont. 3, 4 : El fie TUX eKxArjo'icov 7; 6iarais OVK apeVxet troi, ow5e 
 pojbttcjejs TO rij? eTTto-KOTnijs AetTOVpyrjiua fiterflbv ex et "> <*AAa (cara^poi/eti/ TOU rauTa 
 8taTaa/eVou (Tio-rijpos ireJrotTjicas o-avToV irapaitaAw, /ur; TOtavra Aoyt'fov /u.7)Se ave'xov 
 T<av TavTa <rvfifiov\ev6vT<av' ov yap dfta ApaKoi/Tt'ou TaOVa' a yap 6 Kvpto? Sia rdv 
 a7ro<rToA(i>i> TeTviriaice, ravra xaAa (cai j3c'/3ata fie'vei* 17 Se riav a8e\<t>tov SeiAi'a iraii- 
 <7erat. ti yap TOV avrov vovv t\\ov jrai/res, oloi' v\iv tx ov<riv ' <n>nfiov\evovTfS <70i, 
 7ra> ov eyevov <rv XP'O'Ttavo?, iiturKoirtav JUT) OI/TWV ; eav fie Kai ot fie6' ^as ai'aAa- 
 /3cotri TOV TOLOVTOV vovv, wwt av <rv<TTf\vai. Svin/jtrtovTai al tic/cAijcriat ; jj vofti^ov<nv oi 
 o-vj^/SovXevovre's trot nySev eiAi)</>eVat o-e, ort Karaifrpovova-iv ; a\\a (cat TOUTO i^euSij. 
 iapa. yap auTOVS vopifeiv /u.r)6ei/ eti/at /iT)5t TT)!' TOU Aourpoi) \apiv, iav Ttves TOUTOU 
 KOTou|>poi'<Ti.' aAA" eiArji^os, & ayam)Te ApaKOfTte" JUT) ave'xou rait' orv/ix/3ovAevoi'Twv 
 <roi, f-fj&f airara aawrov airatnjSTJffeTat yap TOUTO ?rapa row SfSiaxoTOS 6(Ov. rj OVK 
 fjKova-at TOV aTroo-roAou Ae'-yovros MTJ ajxe'Aet TOV ev o-ot xaptV/otaTos. The expression 
 ij Tijs ejrto-itOTr^s X"P l * occurs in 2.
 
 UI.] The Witness of Church History. 145 
 
 Nazianzus' eloquence so high as in speaking of the Gregory of 
 priesthood? There is the intense sense of the 
 dignity of the priesthood, of the surpassing moral 
 claim which it makes on those who share it ; l there 
 is the clear and powerful realization of its connection 
 with the whole purpose of the Incarnation : of 
 the dependence of the priesthood of the Christian 
 ministry upon the unique priesthood of Christ, and 
 of its relation to the Mosaic priesthood as being its 
 spiritual counterpart and fulfilment; 2 there is the 
 unfailing spirituality of idea the outward sacrifice 
 which it is the priest's high vocation to offer, always 
 being kept in close connection with its inward and 
 spiritual correlative, ' the sacrifice of praise and of a 
 contrite heart, which is the only sacrifice which God 
 
 1 See especially Orat. ii. 94, 95 (on the occasion of his ordination as pres- 
 byter, A.D. 361) : OlSa S' eyaiye fj.rjSf TOVS tv TOis craj/j.ao'i TOIV tcpe'top ij rCiv BVJJ.O.TUV 
 dvefeTaoTOvs fievovras aAAa TeAei'ovs Te'Aeia vpoaayfiv vtvoni&nevov, or/fi/SoAov, ot/uat, 
 TOVTO TTJ9 Kara \f/v\rjv dpTioTriTOS' fxijSt oroAT)s TTJS JepaTCKrjs ij o~Kevovy TLVOS TWV 
 ayiiav i^avctv Trai/rl 0efj.irbv ov ju.7)5t T<ZS Outri'a; avra; v<ji' !>v Kal ore Kal ov JITJ 
 Ka#rjKOi> Jjv oj/aAcViceo'flai' fATjSe TO tAaiov airo/xt/uLeto'dai rqj xP t '" e< S MlSe TO Svfj.iafj.a 
 rijs o-ui/fleVeios 1 /xrjSe el? TO lepov ei&ifvai, 6o"Tt? ^ \fru\riv ij aw.aa ov xaOapd;, jue^pi 
 at TO>V /itiKpOTOTCov' TOaovrou Sec ecj Ta ayia Tfaiy ayi'aw irpoo~i^otT<jj' floppoVKTO, iv 
 ft Kai airaf TOV tviavTOv fiovov ejri/UaToi/ ^y TOCTOUTOU 5ec TO KOTaTreTaafta 7) TO 
 lAao'T^ptoi' T; TTJI' Kifiiarbv fi TO. XepoujSlfj, ij irpoo'/SAe'ireii' elyai Tra^rbs >j Trpoo'dnTeO'Sai. 
 TauTa ouv eiScu? e^w, (cot OTI ^ii)6eis a^io? TOV /xeyaAou Kal Scov, Kal 0vfj.a.TOS Kai 
 apxiepe'ws, b'o"Ttj /XT) irporepov tavrbv Trape'cTT/jo'e TW Oe&T Ovaiav ta<ra.v, ayiav, nySe 
 TTfv Aoyifcrji' AaTpttai/ fvapecrrov firf$fii;a.TO, jaijSe e&vcrt Tip 0e<3 OvtrCav aivetrcias Kal 
 irvevfia. <ruvTfTpiii.^fvov, rfv fiovT)i> 6 TraiAra Soil? airaiTet Trap' ijfuav Ovtriav, iris 
 efieAAop Oapprjo'a.t: Trpo<r<j>epfiv avTia TJJI' fu>6ev, r^v riav /aeyaAwi/ fivanripiiav OLiniTvirov, 
 jj irus lepe'u; o^ij/iia Kal oi'0fj.a viro&vfO'Oa.i, irplv 6o"t'ois tp-yoi? TeAeiaiaai Tas ^t tpas. 
 
 2 Orat. x. 4 t Ala TOVTO ei? fxeVoi* ayeis Kal vjro^copovi'Tos Aafi/Savjj Kal rrapa 
 O"eavTO>/ Kaflcfcis' TOVTO TO e/xoi> aOiKrjfia, (^airj? ac ; Kal KOti/wfbi' TTOIJ; Twy <f>povriStov Kal 
 T<OI/ O'Teilxii'ODV Sia TOVTO \pdty ap^cepe'a Kal 7repi|3dAAeis TOI/ iro6^pij Kal wepiTi'ftjs TTJI> 
 Ki&apiv Kal Trpoadyecs TCO 6vcriaoT)jpt'([)Tii)S Tri<eiifiaTiKi}S 6AoKavTaio"<o? Kal flveis TOI/ 
 fj.6<r\ov TTjs TcAetioo"ea>s Kal TeAetots Ta? x 'P a 5 T< {' >rvev^iaTi <cal elo'dyets ts Ta ayia TW^ 
 ayiiav fironreva'ovTa Kal iroieis AeiTOvpybi/ TTJI O-KTJI/IJ? TTJS aAT)0H'TJs TJf fTrr)(v o Kvpto; 
 Kal OVK avflpcoTros' ei e Kal tiiov Vfioii/ TE TUV XP'' /TU> ' Ka ' ujrep ou Kal ei? oy fj ^pt'crty, 
 oifie TOVTO 6 rranjp TOV aArj^tvov Kal OI/TOJS xP t(7TO "> "^ *XP l<rcv ^atov ayaAAido'ews irapa 
 TOVS fieToxovs auTOV, ^pio*a$ TTJV av^pajTroTriTa T|) flednjTi, oiio'Te TroiTJaai Ta afi^oTepa. 
 ei>, Kal aviTos 6 (?ebs Kal Kv'pios r)ij.!av 'I>)<ro{/s Xpto-Tos, 5i* 08 TI;I> KaTaAAayrj^ eo^i(Ka/aei'. 
 Kal TO BifVfMl TO ayiov, o fOero )/Jiaf eis TTJC Buucovtav THVTTJI' ev jj Kal to-TriKa/iec 
 Kal Kavx<ifxe#a err' eAjri'St TIJ? SO^TJS TOV Kvptov rmiav 'Irjaov Xpt<TTOV, u rj 6dfa ij 
 TOVf acaii-as Tail' altavutv. a/.'.);v. 
 
 K
 
 146 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 asks of us ' ; l there is the anxious sense of the 
 difficulty of the pastoral cure, in view of all the per- 
 plexing varieties in men's dispositions and neces- 
 sities, capacities and states of life, all of which the 
 pastor must have in constant and instinctive view ; 
 there is, lastly, the strong belief in the reality of 
 ordination grace conveyed through the laying on 
 of hands. 2 
 
 Chrysostom. John Chrysostom, again, is emphatic in asserting 
 that orthodoxy is ' of no avail to justify a Christian 
 body, unless its priesthood is secured by proper 
 ordination.' 3 But if he thus shows himself to be alive 
 to the spiritual dignity of the priesthood, in virtue 
 alike of its sacrificial and of its judicial powers, he is 
 equally alive to its responsibility for individual souls 
 laying immense stress on the necessity for consid- 
 erateness, for gentle and patient self-adaptation to 
 the different characters and needs and weaknesses of 
 men, whether of high or low estate. 4 He is as im- 
 pressive on the function of the pastor as on that of 
 
 1 See the quotation above from Orat. ii. On the true succession to the episcopate 
 moral as well as actual see Orat. xxi. on St. Athanasius. 
 
 2 Cf. the account of St. Basil on his death-bed (Orat. xliii. 78) : OavnaTovpyei riav 
 irpoeiprjfteVwf OVK eAaTTOV waking his faculties of speech and action on the verge of 
 death to ordain some of his disciples, rrji' x e 'P a SiStavi xa.1 TO TireC/na. St. Basil's own 
 clear view about Church ordinations is cited pp. 176 n. 1 , 353. There is a striking 
 passage on the sacramental change wrought in a man by ordination in Gregory of 
 Nyssa, in Bapt. Chr. P. G. xlvi. p. 581 D. 
 
 3 In Ephes. Horn. xi. 5, and see his famous work de Sacerdotio iii. 4-7 ; vi. 4. 
 
 * Cf. de Sacerdot. ii. 3, 4 ; iii. 16 (on the case of the widows) ; iv. (latter part) ; vi. 
 8. This is a remarkable feature of the patristic conception of the ministry ; for great 
 orators, like Gregory and Chrysostom, are apt to be more alive to the common 
 sensibilities of man than sympathetic with the differences of individual temperament. 
 This insistence on the need of discerning men's different needs and characters 
 appears equally in the western writers on the ministry. If it is not so prominent in 
 St. Ambrose's de Officiis, it appears sometimes remarkably in St. Leo's conception of 
 government where we should not expect it, and it is very prominent in St. Gregory 
 (de Cura Pastorali ii. init. and iii. This work had immense recognition and autho- 
 rity in the West and even in the East ; see pref. to Mr. Bramley's translation). The 
 same characteristic appears in the instructions to the penitentiary priest in the 
 ancient Ordo Romanus (ap. Hittorp. p. 25 f.).
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 147 
 
 the priest. We should notice also that while he 
 speaks of the common priesthood which belongs to 
 bishops and presbyters and emphasizes (like some 
 westerns) the closeness of the two orders to one 
 another in dignity, he never fails to distinguish the 
 unique privilege and power of ordaining which be- 
 longs to the bishop. 1 
 
 This special power of the episcopate was empha- E P ; P hanius. 
 sized in the famous saying of Chrysostom's younger 
 contemporary, Epiphanius, that while presbyters 
 could beget children to the Church, i.e. by baptism, 
 only bishops could beget Fathers to the Church, i.e. 
 by ordination. This passage in Epiphanius 2 is im- 
 portant (like the action of the Alexandrian council 
 in the case of Colluthus), because it gives us an 
 expression of the Church's mind in clear view of the.*- 
 antagonistic position. Aerius 3 had definitely he 4u 
 that there was no difference of order 4 between a 
 
 * Cf. ffom. in i Tim. xi. i : Ou n-oAu p.io-ov avrtai> [irpeo"j3vTe'p<oi/] (cat eiriirKoiriaf 
 Kal yap xal aviTOt &iSacrKa\Cai> eiaiv avaStoeyfuevoi Kal ifpo<rratriav 7175 encxATjat'as. 
 (cat a jrepi firio-KOTTtav eiTre, TOLVTO. Kal irpecr/SuWpoi? apjuoTTef rg yap \eiporovia fi-ovy 
 t>jrepj3e/3rj(cao"i, (eat TOUTOI fj.6vov SoKOva't ir\fOv(KTfiv TOUS irp(T/3uTe'povs. Horn, in 
 Prtil. i. i : OVK av oe irpeo~/3t!Tepoi firi&KoTrov f\fipoTovfi<rav. ffom. in i Tim. 
 xiii. i : ou yap STJ jrpc<r^uTcpoi TOV inivKOwov exeiporovovv. Chrysostom (on Phi!, 
 i. i) admits that St. Paul uses the terms bishop and presbyter interchangeably. But 
 so also, he adds, is the word Siajeovia applied to the bishop's office. The language was 
 not fixed, but the three offices were distinct : on-ep ovv t$>r\v, KO.L oi irpecr/Sv-repoi 
 TO TraAaibc eKaAoviro eiriVicoTroi icac SIOLKOVOI. TOW Xpio"TOU, Kal oi ejrio-KOTrot Trpeo"- 
 jSurepoi' oOfv Kal vvv iroAAot o-ujx7rpeo-/3uTe'po> ewC<rKonoi, yp<i<f>ov<ri, Kal trvv&iaxovia' 
 Aoiwoi' S TO i&iaov eKa<rrta aTroi/ei/e'/xijTai ovofj-a, o eirtVcoiros (cat 6 irpfO'ftvTCpo^. 
 
 2 adv. ffaer, Ixxv. 4 : *OTI /uec o<^poo~uin)9 eoTt TO irav eij.ir\ov [sc. Aerius], 
 rots <rvi'f<riv (ceKTTjfieVots TOVTO JijAov TO \iyeiv avrov ini&KOirov Kal irpfafivrepov 
 io'civ fii/ai. Kal irws eoTat TOUTO Svvarov ; y (Lev yap e<7Ti irartpiav yevvr)TiKT) 
 Ta^ts- iraTe'pa? yap ytvva TJJ ic(cAT)o-ia' 17 Se iraTe'pas /HTJ Suvafte'iT/ yfvv^v Sia. TTJS 
 rov Aovrpou jraAiyyei/eo'ia? TfKva yevff rff e(C(cAijcrta, ov fiT)i> Trare'pas i) Stiao-KaAous. 
 icat ira>s olov Te J\v TOV Trpe<rflvT(pov Ka0i<rrat> fit) e\ovra \eipodfcriav rov \eipoTovflv, 
 i) eiirfiv avrov etvai Icrov r<a firiVKomp ; 
 
 * Aerius was still alive ( i) when Epiphanius wrote. His original motive in 
 formulating his anti-ecclesiastical views was not apparently a noble one, though 
 Epiphanius does not make the best of those against whom he writes. He was in 
 opposition not only to the right of bishops but to other church customs, and he was 
 also of Arian antecedents. 
 
 * fata Tafi?, fii'a TifiJj, ci> au>>/xa (| 3).
 
 148 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 bishop and a presbyter. ' The bishop lays on hands,' 
 he said, ' but so does the presbyter : x the bishop 
 baptizes, so does the presbyter likewise : the bishop is 
 the minister of worship, so is the presbyter: the bishop 
 sits upon the raised seat (throne), and the presbyter 
 too.' There is then no difference. Aerius does not 
 seem to have appealed to any church tradition, but 
 simply to facts in the Church's present constitution 
 and to the common use of the words ' presbyter ' and 
 ' episcopus ' in the New Testament. Epiphanius 
 meets his argument from the New Testament with a 
 mixture of truth and error with which we are not 
 at present concerned. 2 He meets him, however, first 
 of all with an appeal to the mind of the Church on 
 the matter. His customary abusiveness of tone must 
 not blind us to the fact that he speaks clearly, with 
 the consciousness that he is on quite sure ground, 
 when he says that, whatever the presbyter may do, 
 he cannot lay on hands in ordination that in this 
 sense bishops alone constitute the ' generative order ' 
 of the Church. 3 
 
 Summary Now the evidence of the Eastern Church has been 
 for the East. p assec j j n review. What is the result ? Leaving out 
 
 * I.e. in certain benedictions of penitents the priest used prayer with the laying on 
 of hands ' the prayer of imposition of hands.' This at least the Church would have 
 admitted ; irpea/Svrepos x et P " 6T '> " X et P OTO " e ' (Apost. Const, viii. 28). See note 
 (22) on Apost. Const, viii in Migne Patrol. Grace. \. p. 1083. 
 
 2 He denies (unlike Chrysostom) that St. Paul uses n-peo-jSuTtpo? and en-io-fton-os of 
 the same person. So far he has a bad case. On the other hand he argues that the 
 Church in the apostolic days was incomplete ; in some places there were bishops and 
 deacons, in others presbyters, according to the degree of completeness of each Church 
 or the fitness of individuals : ov yap navra. eiSus ySvvri&ria'a.v 01 aTrdoroAoi KaTa- 
 <rrfj<rat. . . . OVTTW [OUTO> MSS.] TTJS eKitAijcrias Xa/3ov(njs TO. 7r\i)pai/iiora TTJS oixoi'O/niaj. 
 ouTto KOLT' e/ceiVo xaipoC JI<TO.V ot TOTTOI. ical yap fKa.<TTOv rrpay/na OVK air' apx'Jt TO. 
 irdWa fcr\ev aX\a irpojSaiVovTOS TOV \povov TO. Trpb? TeAetaKrtv riav xft fl ^ v Kart\p- 
 Ti^ero ( 5). He also calls attention to the fact that the presbyters have at least 
 some one over them in the Pastoral Epistles. Cf. Theodore Mops, on i Tim. iii. 8. 
 
 3 There is a passage about the apostolic succession, which may be referred to, in 
 Ephraem Syrus adv. Ifaer. serm. xxii, see Opp. Syr. [ed. Rom. 1740] ii. p. 488.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 149 
 
 of account for the moment some elements in the 
 estimate formed of the ministry which will come into 
 consideration later, it is enough to say at present 
 that everywhere, where there is any evidence forth- 
 coming, we have found the threefold ministry existing 
 and regarded as alone authoritative in virtue of suc- 
 cession from the Apostles. In all cases the authority 
 to ordain the clergy has been found, wherever the 
 question can be raised, to belong to the bishops, nor 
 can fair evidence be produced of any single instance 
 in which ordination by a presbyter (or in view of the 
 exceptional arrangement supposed to have existed 
 at Alexandria, we must say, by a presbyter with the 
 ordinary commission) was either allowed 1 or even 
 contemplated as under any circumstances allowable 
 or valid. 
 
 B. We pass from the witness of Greek to that of B. The west. 
 Latin Christianity. Here we may deal very briefly successions 
 with the evidence for the existence of the successions 
 of bishops in the period under consideration, for it is 
 not disputed. The episcopal succession was clearly 
 of immemorial antiquity at Rome when Irenaeus 
 wrote. There is no trace of a pre-episcopal age in 
 any other part of Italy, or in Africa, Gaul, or Spain. 
 The beautiful letter of the Churches of Lyons and 
 Vienne, giving an account of the persecution which 
 fell upon them in the time of Marcus Aurelius, con- 
 firms the testimony of Irenaeus for Gaul. 2 The lan- 
 guage of Tertullian is evidence enough for Africa, 
 where indeed episcopacy developed into an exuber- 
 ance of sees rivalled only in Asia. It is true that in 
 
 1 See on the case of Paphnmius.App. Note E. 
 
 2 Euseb. H.E. v. i. There is the aged bishop Pothinus, 6 TT)I> Suucovuiv T^ 
 en-icncoTTTJs fv \ovySow<a irfirurrevpievos ; there is the deacon Sanctus ; there is the 
 presbyter Irenaeus (c. 4).
 
 150 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 later centuries episcopacy took some remarkable 
 forms, especially, as has been noticed, in the Irish 
 Church. 1 There Christianity was monastic in a 
 unique sense. The abbot took his place as spiritual 
 head side by side with the chieftain of the clan. 
 Often, indeed, the same person was both abbot and 
 chieftain, and the old clan government continued 
 with a new monastic character. Under these circum- 
 stances the bishop lost the governing authority which 
 properly belonged to his office and became a mere 
 instrument kept to perform those spiritual functions 
 which he only could fulfil. But for such purposes 
 
 1 A satisfactory account of the episcopate in the Scotic Church of Ireland may be 
 found in Todd's St. Patrick, Apostle of Ireland, and Reeves' Eccl. Antiquities of 
 Down, Connor, and Dromore. Its three notable features were (i) its indefinite 
 multiplication ; (2) its undiocesan character ; (3) its subordination to the abbot- 
 chiefs. The Church outside the empire, as inside it, was organized on the lines of 
 the existing society. Thus in Ireland it became tribal, and small chieftaincies 
 would have resulted in small episcopates (Reeves p. 303 : ' the spiritual jurisdiction 
 of the bishop was coextensive with the temporal sway of the chieftain '). But what 
 introduced its unique features into Church organization here was its predominantly 
 monastic character. The abbot was the real church ruler, and he was not always or 
 generally a bishop. Hence the subordination of the episcopate. The bishops even 
 lost control over the ordinations which they administered (cf. Bede H.E. iii. 4 ; 
 Todd pp. 7-25). The episcopate, having thus lost its characteristic functions of 
 government, was given as a mark of spiritual distinction (Todd p. 5). Thus it 
 became indefinitely multiplied ; seven bishops are often found together in one spot 
 (Todd pp. 33-35). Also it lost its diocesan character (Reeves p. 135 f. on 'the 
 ambulatory nature of episcopacy '). When the Danish invasions (c. A.D. 795 and 
 onward) drove the Irish clergy and monks in great numbers on to the continent of 
 Europe, the bishops seem to have behaved themselves as if they were in their own 
 country, in entire neglect of diocesan restrictions. Hence conciliar enactments 
 against these ' Scoti qui se dicunt episcopos esse ' (Reeves p. 135). And up to the 
 twelfth century, when the Irish Church was organized on diocesan lines under papal 
 influence, the looseness of Irish episcopacy was a standing scandal to ' canonical ' 
 Europe ; see the protests of Anselm and Bernard, quoted by Todd pp. 2-4 : ' dicitur," 
 writes Anselm to a titular king of Ireland, ' episcopos in terra vestra passim eligi et 
 sine certo episcopatus loco constitui, atque ab uno episcopo episcopum sicut quem- 
 libet presbyterum ordinari.' [This latter irregularity was characteristic of the Celtic 
 Church, but the canonical rule seems to have been observed at lona ; cf. Bede H.E. 
 iii. 17-22]. So St. Bernard (de vita S. Mai. 10) : ' nam, quod inauditum est ab ipso 
 Christianitatis initio, sine ordine, sine ratione "mutabantur et multiplicabantur 
 episcopi pro libitu metropolitan; ita ut unus episcopatus uno non esset contentus, 
 sed singulae paene ecclesiae singulos haberent episcopos.' He clearly does not 
 understand the situation.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 1 5 1 
 
 he was kept : ' the bishops were always applied to, 
 to consecrate churches, to ordain to the ecclesiastical 
 degrees or Holy Orders, including the consecration 
 of other bishops ; to give Confirmation, and the 
 more solemn benedictions ; and to administer the 
 Holy Communion with peculiar rites.' l No acces- 
 sion of power to abbot or king ever militated 
 against the principle of ministerial succession. 
 Through all the different forms which the church 
 ministry assumed, and they have been very various, 
 this has been the constant principle. Never has it 
 been supposed that the accident of ecclesiastical 
 authority, apart from episcopal order, gave a man 
 the power to ordain. 2 
 
 It remains then to seek the light thrown upon this The concep- 
 conception of the ministry in the West mtoisry in 
 
 (1) by typical theologians after A.D. I5O: 3 
 
 (2) by the canons of councils : 
 
 (3) by writers on worship and by the church 
 
 offices. 
 
 (i) St. Cyprian, the great bishop of Carthage, (i) western 
 stands out prominently among western writers who 
 vindicated the claim of the apostolic ministry. Itcypnan, 
 cannot be rightly maintained that he added anything ' 
 new to the belief of his predecessors, western or 
 eastern, in the visible unity of the Church or the 
 authority of the episcopate. Nor did he bring these 
 
 1 Todd St. Patrick p. 5. Cf. Vita S. Brigidae, ed. Colgan in the Triadis 
 Thaumaturgae Ac/a, p. 523; Adamnan VitaS. Columbaei. 36, ed. Fowler (Oxford, 
 1894), p. 47 ; cf. xvii, xxxiv, xL 
 
 2 See App. Note E on some supposed cases of presbyterian ordination. 
 
 3 Clement of Rome is therefore not yet in discussion. The conception of the 
 ministry held by Irenaeus and Tertullian has been already exhibited. A passage 
 from Hippolytus is noticed in another connection, App. Note G.
 
 152 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 two doctrines into any new connection ; Ignatius 
 and Irenaeus had already put the bishop in a very 
 clear position in relation to church unity. Nor again 
 is it true to say that Cyprian in any way created the 
 doctrine of schism or destroyed an existing ' freedom 
 of association ' in the Church. 1 He did not in fact 
 create or innovate, but he gave emphatic expression 
 to an existing church principle in view of the parti- 
 cular circumstances of his episcopate. 
 
 The Church is one, then, this is his position 
 
 1 Dr. Hatch (B.L. p. 103) has maintained that ' the rule [that " there should be 
 only one bishop in a community"] was not firmly established until the third century. 
 Its general recognition was the outcome of the dispute between Cyprian and 
 Novatian.' ' For this assertion,' says Dr. Salmon truly, 'he offers no proof what- 
 ever. "Cyprian certainly treats it as a monstrous and impious thing, that when one 
 bishop had been duly elected another should be ordained ; but there is no evidence 
 that this view was then either novel or singular. Novatian no doubt had a respect- 
 able following, but there is no evidence that he claimed to be anything less than the 
 bishop of Rome, or that either he or any of those who acknowledged him as bishop 
 of Rome acknowledged Cornelius also as bishop' (Expositor, July 1887, p. 8 n. !). 
 The opposite is in fact quite plain : cf. the letters of Cornelius to Fabian and of 
 Dionysius to Novatian, ap. Euseb. H.E. vi. 43, 45. The Novatianist confessors 
 clearly imply that there was no question of acknowledging both : see their profes- 
 sion ap. Cyprian Ep. xlix. To go back a long way before Cyprian, it is surely of the 
 essence of Ignatius' conception that there should be but ' one bishop ' in each com- 
 munity. Of course difficulties may have arisen in particular cases in determining 
 what constituted a community. Ordinarily, no doubt, the civil 'ci vitas' became 
 the ecclesiastical ' parish ' ; but there must have been situations hard to deal with 
 under this rule. Thus Lightfoot is very possibly right in regarding Hippolytus as 
 neither strictly bishop of Portus nor bishop of Rome, but an ' assistant bishop' to 
 the see of Rome, an eTriVfcoTroj fBviav, dealing with the mixed population of various 
 nationalities at Portus, the port of Rome, and traditionally associated therefore 
 with that place, see Clement of Rome vol. ii. pp. 427 ff., cf. also Dr. Salmon in 
 Diet. Chr. Biog. s.v. HIPPOLYTUS iii. pp. 90, 91. But such a position would have 
 been exceptional. 
 
 Harnack appends to his translation of Hatch's work (die GesellscJiaftsverfassung 
 etc. p. 252) a note in disagreement, in the above sense : ' Ich kenne iiberhaupt 
 keinen Grund, der gegen die Annahme spricht, dass sich die Regel, in jeder Stadt 
 sei stets nur ein katholischer Bischof zu dulden, bereits am Ende des zweiten 
 Jahrhunderts festgestellt hat." Dr. Hatch has more recently quoted in support of 
 his view (Growth of Ch. Instit. p. 17) some words of Epiphanius : ov yap n-ore T\ 
 'AAefai/Speta Svo eiricrxoTrous f<7\fv ais at aAAat ir6\ts (adv. Haer. Ixviii. 7). But 
 the second bishop here spoken of as existing in other Churches of Egypt but not at 
 Alexandria is the schismatic Meletian bishop. The Meletian schism is the subject 
 of the whole section, and the context leaves no doubt as to the meaning. On the 
 subject of this note see Ch. Quart. Rev., July 1888, 'Ancient and Modern Ch. 
 Organization.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 153 
 
 with a visible external unity. The essence of that 
 unity lies indeed in a spiritual fact the life of Christ 
 which is communicated to the Church ; but this life 
 is communicated to a visible society, bound together 
 by visible bonds of external association. 1 To this 
 visible society he that would be Christ's must belong ; 
 1 he cannot have God for his father who has not 
 the Church for his mother.' 2 The sin of schism 
 separates from Christ in such completeness that not 
 even martyrdom can expiate it. 3 Of this unity the 
 bishop is in each community at once the symbol, 4 
 the guardian, 5 and the instrument. He is the instru- 
 ment of it because ' the bishops, who succeed to the 
 Apostles by an ordination which makes them their 
 representatives,' are the possessors of that sacerdotal 
 
 1 Cf. de Unit. Eccles. 5 : ' Ecclesia Domin! luce perfusa per orbem totum radios 
 suos porrigit : unum tamen lumen est quod ubique diffunditur, nee unitas corporis 
 separatur : ramos suos in universam terrain copia ubertatis extendit, profluentes 
 largiter rivos latius pandit : unum tamen caput est et origo una et una mater 
 fecund itatis successibus copiosa.' 
 
 2 Ep. Ixxiv. 7 (quoted above, p. 14, with other passages). 
 
 3 de Unit. Eccles. 14. Great light is thrown on Cyprian's conception of the sin 
 of schism, so far as concerns the relations of different Churches, by his subsequent 
 attitude towards Stephen of Rome. He would no doubt have said that the sin 
 of schism in the case of any division lies with the Church from which the unjust 
 claim proceeds which causes the division. Stephen made such a claim, \.e. a claim 
 affecting the independence of the Churches of Africa in an open question, and en- 
 deavoured to enforce it by an excommunication which Cyprian and the Africans 
 ignored. ' Make no mistake,' wrote St. Firmilian of Caesarea, speaking of Stephen, 
 ' you have excommunicated yourself (ap. Cypr. Ep. Ixxv. 24). It is to be remarked 
 that St. Augustin makes St. Cyprian in this matter the type of the unschismatical 
 temper, because, while he maintained the independent judgment of the African 
 Churches, he did not break off communion with those who differed from them ; but, 
 as far as in him lay, remained at unity with them in spite of differences (de Bapt. 
 v. 25. 36). Augustin is following Jerome in this, who commends Cyprian on the 
 same grounds (adv. Lucifer. 25 : ' non cum anathemate eorum qui se sequi 
 noluerant'). 
 
 4 Ep. xliii. 5 : ' Deus unus est et Christus unus et una ecclesia et cathedra una 
 super Petrum Domini voce fundata. Aliud altare constitui aut sacerdotium novum 
 fieri praeter unum altare et unum sacerdotium non potest.' 
 
 5 de Unit. Eccles. 5 : .' Quam unitatem firmiter tenere et vindicare debemus, 
 maxime episcopi qui in ecclesia praesidemus, ut episcopatum quoque ipsum unum 
 atque indivisum probemus.
 
 154 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 authority and grace with which Christ endowed His 
 Church, and which is necessary for her existence. 1 
 This plenitude of the priesthood 2 is in every bishop, 
 and in every bishop equally, just as every one of the 
 Apostles was ' endowed with an equal fellowship of 
 honour and power.' But the apostolate, which was 
 finally given to all equally, was given first to St. 
 Peter, that by its being given first to one man, there 
 might be emphasized for ever the unity which Christ 
 willed to exist among the distinct branches or por- 
 tions of His Church. 3 The episcopate which be- 
 longs to each bishop belongs to him as one of a 
 
 1 Ep. bcvi. 8 : Unde scire debes episcopum in ecclesia esse et ecclesiam in 
 episcopo et si qui cum episcopo non sit in ecclesia non esse.' ib. 4, 5 : ' [Christus] 
 dicit ad apostolos ac per hoc ad omnes praepositos qui apostolis vicaria ordinatione 
 succedunt : Qui audit vos, me audit . . . qui reiicit vos, me reiicit. . . . Unde enim 
 schismata et haereses obortae sunt et oriuntur? dum episcopus qui unus est et 
 ecclesiae praeest superba quorundam praesumptione contemnitur et homo dignatione 
 Dei honoratus indignus hominibus iudicatur.' Ep. xxxiii. i: 'Dominus noster, 
 cuius praecepta metuere et servare debemus, episcopi honorem et ecclesiae suae 
 rationem disponens in evangelio loquitur et dicit Petro : Ego tibi dico quia tu es 
 Petrus, et super istam petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam, et portae inferorum non 
 vincent earn, et tibi dabo claves regni caelorum, et quae ligaveris etc. . . . Inde per 
 temporum et successionum vices episcoporum ordinatio et ecclesiae ratio decurrit ut 
 ecclesia super episcopos constituatur et omnis actus ecclesiae per eosdem prae- 
 positos gubernetur. Cum hoc ita divina lege fundatum sit, miror quosdam audaci 
 temeritate sic mihi scribere voluisse ut ecclesiae nomine litteras facerent, quando 
 ecclesia in episcopo et clero et in omnibus stantibus sit constitute. ' 
 
 2 As having this plenitude of the priesthood, the word sacerdos is generally 
 used of the bishop ; but the presbyter also has sacerdotal powers. Cyprian speaks 
 of our Lord as 'adorning the body of the presbyterate with glorious priests,' i.e. at 
 the ordination of a presbyter (Ep. xl). Cyprian did not draw out the analogy of 
 bishop, priest, and deacon to high-priest, priest, and Levite of the O.T. See Benson's 
 Cyprian (Macmillan, 1897) pp. 31-41. 
 
 * de Onit. Eccles. 4 : ' Loquitur Dominus ad Petrum : Ego tibi dico, inquit, quia 
 tu es Petrus etc. . . . Super unum aedificat ecclesiam, et quamvis apostolis omnibus 
 post resurrectionem suam parem potestatem tribuat et dicat : Sicut misit me Pater 
 et ego mitto vos : accipiteetc. . . . tamen ut unitatem manifestaret, unitatis eiusdem 
 originem ab uno incipientem sua auctoritate disposuit. Hoc erant utique et ceteri 
 apostoli quod fuit Petrus, pari consortio praediti et honoris et potestatis, sed 
 exordium ab unitate proficiscitur, ut. ecclesia Christi una monstretur. Quam unam 
 ecclesiam etiam in cantico canticorum Spiritus sanctus ex persona Domini designat 
 et dicit : Una est columba mea.' ib. 5 : Episcopatus unus est, cuius a singulis in 
 solidum pars tenetur,' i.e. in such a way that each has the responsibility of the 
 whole ; the whole is in each.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 155 
 
 great brotherhood linked by manifold ties into a 
 corporate unity. 1 
 
 A bishop stands, then, in various relations to the 
 Church. In virtue of his election he represents his 
 flock : 2 he is a part of the Church and in a sense re- 
 sponsible to it and stands in a certain constitutional, 
 though not clearly defined, relation to his presby- 
 terate and the clergy generally. They are his 
 recognised council, advisers, co-operators ; he does 
 nothing without them. 3 But over and above this 
 he represents divine authority. He is divinely 
 appointed ; he has not taken his honour upon him- 
 self. 4 Moreover, in the exercise of his authority, he 
 is responsible to no man outside his Church but to 
 God only. Cyprian does not explain, in connection 
 with this position, the meaning of the provincial 
 council of which he made so much use. Presumably 
 the provincial council has a certain authority over 
 the individual bishop, 5 but none the less the inde- 
 pendence of each bishop is asserted by Cyprian with 
 unrestricted completeness. 6 His respect for the see 
 
 1 Ep. Iv. 24 : ' Cum sit a Christo una ecclesia per totum mundum in multa membra 
 divisa, item episcopatus unus episcoporum multorum concordi numerositate 
 diffusus.' 
 
 2 ' Ecclesia in episcopo est.' Cf. Ep. Iv. 5, and Diet. Chr. Biog. i. p. 741. 
 
 3 See above, p. 95, and also Cyprian's letters to his presbyters, when in retire- 
 ment, explaining the grounds on which he had ordained to the clergy without con- 
 sultation ; Ep. xxxviii. i : ' In ordinationibus clericis, fratres carissimi, solemus vos 
 ante consulere et mores ac merita singulorum communi consilio ponderare.' Ep. 
 xxx. 5 : ' collatione consiliorum cum episcopis, presbyteris, diaconis, confessoribus, 
 pariter ac stantibus laicis.' See Epp. xxix; Ixvii. 5. 
 
 4 Ep. Ixx. 3 : ' Secundum [Domini] dignationem sacerdotium eius in ecclesia 
 administramus. 1 Ep. lix. 5 : ' Existimat aliquis summa et magna aut non sciente 
 aut non permittente Deo in ecclesia Dei fieri, et sacerdotes, id est dispensatores 
 eius, erunt non de eius sententia ordinati?' On the contrary: 'plane episcopi non 
 de voluntate Dei fiunt, sed qui extra ecclesiam fiunt.' 
 
 5 St. Augustin expresses the gradations in the authority of bishop and of church 
 councils (de Bapt. v. 22. 30). 
 
 6 Ep, Ixii. 3 : ' Qua in re nee nos vim cuiquam facimus aut legem damus, quando 
 habeat in ecclesiae administratione voluntatis suae arbitrium liberum unusquisque
 
 156 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 of Rome, as being in a special historical sense 
 what every episcopate is essentially, as possessing 
 the same authority the see of Peter, will not go to 
 the length of allowing it any jurisdiction over other 
 Churches. It may be in a special way the symbol 
 of unity, as Peter was among the Apostles, but it is 
 nothing more. 1 
 
 This is the theory of the episcopate into which 
 St. Cyprian poured all the force of his great char- 
 acter, all the dignity of his strong holiness, to make 
 it a living reality. He stands out in church history 
 as the typical bishop, and with his weighty sentences 
 he impressed on the episcopal theory an abiding 
 form. 
 
 Lucifer, Next to Cyprian, it will be well to quote a vivid 
 
 expression of the principle of the succession from 
 a bishop of Cagliari in Sardinia that Lucifer who 
 was Athanasius' friend, but whose impatience and 
 
 praepositus, rationem actus sui Domino redditurus.' Ep. Ixxiii. 26 : ' nemini 
 praescribentes aut praeiudicantes, quo minus unusquisque episcoporum quod putat 
 facial, habens arbitrii sui liberam potestatem.' 
 
 1 It is ' locus Petri,' 'Petri cathedra, ecclesia principalis, unde unitas sacerdotalis 
 exorta est ' (Epp. Iv. 8, lix. 14). By these last words he means probably that the 
 African succession came from Rome (so Puller Primitive Saints and the See of 
 Rome, p. 56). He goes on to assert the independent jurisdiction of each episcopate. 
 Cf. Jerome Ep. cxlvi ad Evangelum : ' Ubicunque fuerit episcopus sive Romae, 
 sive Eugubii, sive Constantinopoli, sive Rhegii, sive Alexandriae, sive Tanis, 
 eiusdem merit!, eiusdem est etiam sacerdotii. Potentia divitiarum et paupertatis 
 humilitas vel sublimiorem vel inferiorem episcopum non facit. Ceterum omnes 
 successores apostolorum sunt.' It is not the place here to discuss what effect this 
 conception of the see of Peter, as in a special way the symbol and centre of unity, 
 had on the development of Petrine claims. The conception reappears in St. 
 Optatus of Milevis (de Schism. Don. ii. 2, vii. 3 with a more ' papal ' tone, but cf. 
 vi. 3) and in St. Augustin; see ABCDarium 1. 232: ' Numerate sacerdotes vel ab 
 ipsa Petri sede ' ; c. Ep. Man. 4 : ' Multa sunt alia quae in [ecclesiae catholicae] 
 gremio me iustissime teneant . . . tenet ab ipsa sede Petri apostoli, cui pascendas 
 oves suas post resurrectionem Dominus commendavit, usque ad praesentem epis- 
 copatum successio sacerdotum." Elsewhere he speaks of all the Apostles as the 
 source of the succession : ' ecclesia ab ipso Christo inchoata et per apostolos provecta 
 certa successionum serie usque ad haec tempora, toto terrarum orbe dilatata . . . 
 ecclesia, quae ab ipso per apostolos succedentibus sibimet episcopis usque ad haec 
 tempora propagata dilatatur ' (c. Faust, xxviii. 2, 4).
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 157 
 
 violence led him at last into being the founder of a 
 schismatical body. He is addressing Constantius 
 the emperor out of his place of exile in Palestine 
 and speaking of his nobler friend Athanasius. 1 
 
 ' You persecute the man,' he says, ' whom you ought to listen to. 
 While *he is still alive, you send to succeed him that George who is 
 your partner in heresy, when, even if Athanasius had been set free 
 from the body, it was not lawful for you to send any one, but it was 
 and is in God's hand to appoint whom he thought proper as bishop of 
 His people, and that through His servants the catholic bishops. For 
 no man can be filled with the power of the Holy Ghost to govern God's 
 people, save he whom God has chosen, and on whom hands have 
 have been laid by the catholic bishops, just as, when Moses was dead, 
 we find his successor Joshua, the son of Nun, filled with the Holy 
 Ghost ; because, says Scripture, Moses had laid his hands upon him.' 2 
 
 Now we approach an interesting class of writers Ambrosias- 
 
 . , ter . Jerome, 
 
 who represent a tendency in the western Church to etc., c. A.D. 
 
 360" 400. 
 
 minimize the position of the episcopate. There is, 
 first, the author of the Commentaries on St. Paul's 
 Epistles who is commonly called Ambrosiaster and 
 who wrote in Damasus' episcopate at Rome. 3 Who- 
 ever he was, he was a man of mental power and 
 
 1 Whether he was himself ever actually separated from the Church is doubtful ; 
 see Diet. Chr. Biog. s.v. LUCIFER. His writings date from his exile. 
 
 2 de S. Athan. i. 9 : ' Persequeris eum per quern te audire praeceperit Dominus ; 
 agente eo in rebus humanis cohaereticum tuum Georgium mittis successorem, cum 
 tametsi fuisset liberatus iam Athanasius ex corpore, tibi non licuerit mittere, sed 
 fuerit ac sit in Dei manu quern fuisset dignatus populo suo antistitem instituere per 
 servos videlicet suos, hoc est catholicos episcopos. Neque enim posset impleri 
 virtute Spiritus sancti ad Dei gubernandum populum nisi is quern Deus allegisset 
 cuique manus per catholicos episcopos fuisset imposita, sicut defuncto Moyse 
 impletum Spiritu sancto invenimus successorem eius Iseum Naue. Loquitur 
 scriptura sancta dicens : Et Iseus filius Naue impletus est spiritu intelligentiae ; 
 imposuerat enim Moyses manum super eum : et audierunt eum filii Israel et fecerunt 
 secundum quod mandavit Dominus Moysi. Conspicis ordinationi Dei te obviam 
 isse contra Dei faciendo voluntatem, temet mucrone gladii tui iugulatum, siquidem 
 non licuerit ordinari, nisi fuisset defunctus Athanasius, et defuncto Athanasio 
 catholicus debuerit per catholicos ordinari episcopos.' 
 
 3 'Cuius [ecclesiae] hodie rector est Damasus (in i Tim. iii. 14). We may 
 assume that St. Augustin is right in calling him Hilary (see for evidence Diet. Chr. 
 Biog. s.v. AMBROSIASTER). It is however hardly possible that he can be Hilary, 
 the Sardinian deacon, associated with Lucifer in his embassage to Constantius in 
 A.D. 354, and subsequently a ' Luciferian." Not so much (a) because St. Augustin 
 calls him ' sanctus,' for Jerome calls Lucifer ' beatus ' and ' bonus pastor ' even when
 
 158 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 spiritual insight ' brief in words, but weighty in 
 matter,' and one must add, of a rather sharply cri- 
 tical spirit. Secondly, we have the author of some 
 Questions on the Old and New Testament, once 
 ascribed to Augustin probably a Roman writer 
 of the same epoch as the commentator, or it* may 
 even be the same person. 1 Thirdly, there is Jerome, 
 who expresses the same sentiments as the other two 
 writers, but at a later date, apparently when he had 
 become thoroughly disgusted with the Church at 
 Rome, and had changed his earlier tone towards it 
 and its clergy. 2 It must be added that Jerome's 
 sentiments passed into the writings of some later 
 western authors. 3 
 
 he is deploring his grave mistake (adv. Lucifer. 20 though, be it remembered, 
 St. Augustin borrows considerably from this little treatise in his argument against 
 the Donatists and in it Hilary is pilloried with all the power of Jerome's sarcasm) 
 not so much, however, on this account as (b) because the commentary on i Cor. i. 
 12-16 is not the work of one who followed Lucifer, a rigorous anabaptist (adv. 
 Lucifer. 26), and (c) because he acknowledges Damasus as bishop. But we have 
 not the means of saying how much the Commentaries may have been interpolated 
 or when. 
 
 1 He wrote at Rome (Qu. cxv ; cf. his polemic against Roman deacons in Qu. ci ; 
 the ' we ' who are opposed to the Romans in Qu. Ixxxiv are probably the Christians 
 see Langen Gesck. der RSm. Kirche i. p. 600) about 300 years after the destruc- 
 tion of Jerusalem under Vespasian (Qu. xliv) i.e. A.D. 370-380. He was seemingly 
 a priest ' sacerdos Dei et praepositus plebis ' (Qu. cxx) ; and we gather that he 
 was a presbyter from his polemics against deacons and depreciation of bishops 
 (Qu. ci). This, however, does not give us any ground for saying that he belonged 
 to the Luciferian party. The same tone meets us in Jerome. Dom Morin holds 
 him to be certainly the same man as ' Ambrosiaster,' Rev. dhist. et de lit. relig. 
 Tom. iv p. 98. 
 
 2 In Jerome's earlier years his tone is papal, e.g. in his letters to Damasus from 
 the East A.D. 375-380 (//. xv, xvi). Afterwards, disgusted with Roman manners 
 and disappointed of the Roman episcopate, he broke with the Church there A.D. 
 385, and his abusive tone about the Roman clergy is subsequent to this date, e.g. 
 Ep. Hi ad Nepotian. is after A.D. 393. His Commentaries on the New Testament 
 which contain the passages minimizing the episcopal office by comparison with the 
 presbyterate, date A.D. 386-392. His letter to Evangelus (E#. cxlvi) is marked by 
 its hostile tone towards Rome to belong to the period subsequent at any rate to 
 A.D. 385, and Ep. Ixix ad Oceanunt is about A.D. 400. 
 
 3 See App. Note F. 'S. Hieronymi sententia,' says Morinus (de S. Ord. p. iii. 
 ex. iii. 2. 19), 'universae ecclesiae Latinae acceptissima fuit et immerito a multis 
 theologis cum gravi censura repudiata: imprudentes enim cum S. Hieronymo 
 universam prope ecclesiam Latinam condemnarunt.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History, 1 59 
 
 What then is it that these writers teach about These last 
 
 .11 i . writers 
 
 the ministry? First, it must be said that they in () are sacer 
 
 /-i dotal; 
 
 no way minimize the sacerdotal character of the 
 ministry. Jerome indeed sometimes appears as an 
 extreme sacerdotalist ; and if the unknown Com- 
 mentator is not that, at least he gives us a substantial 
 view of the priestly function. ' Layings-on of hands 
 [i.e. ordinations],' he says, 'are mystical words, by 
 which the selected man is confirmed for his work, 
 receiving authority, so that he should venture in the 
 Lord's place to offer sacrifice to God.' ' That/ says 
 St. Jerome, ' can be no Church which has no priest.' 1 
 
 Next, none of these writers disputes the present ($) do not 
 authority of the threefold ministry or the limitation e^dusfve e 
 to bishops of the power of ordination. They do not b?shoL In 
 maintain that, even in the extremest circumstances, thl 
 a presbyter a presbyter of the existing Church 
 could validly ordain. Thus the Commentator is 
 emphatic 'that none of the clergy, who has not 
 been ordained to it, should take to himself any 
 office which he knows not to have been intrusted or 
 granted to him ' (in spite, that is, of what may have 
 been the primitive practice). ' It never was lawful 
 or permitted,' he says again, ' that an inferior should 
 ordain a superior, for nobody gives what he has not 
 received.' ' All orders are in the bishop ' ; ' the 
 ' dignity of all ordinations is in the bishop.' ' What 
 does a bishop do,' says St. Jerome, even when he is 
 minimizing the episcopate, 'that a presbyter does 
 not do, except ordination^ The bishop and the 
 presbyter are to one another as the high priest and 
 priest of the old covenant. 
 
 Once more, they do' not regard the present three- or since the 
 
 Apostles : 
 1 For all quotations from these writers see App. Note F.
 
 160 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 fold arrangement of the ministry as an innovation of 
 the postapostolic Church, so that it should lack the 
 authority of the Apostles. The present constitution 
 represents their ordering. Nay, according to the 
 Commentator, it represents more : ' because all things 
 are from one God the Father, He hath decreed that 
 each Church should he presided over by one bishop.' 
 only they Jerome, however, seems to hold that, while Christ 
 
 maintain . . . 
 
 that presby- instituted only one priestly office, it was the exigencies 
 
 ters were 
 
 at first of church life which led to its being sub-divided 
 s> under apostolic sanction into the presbyterate and 
 the episcopate. At any rate, whether the distinction 
 was 'ordained by Christ Himself or of apostolic 
 authority, these writers were agreed that (as the 
 names ' bishop ' and ' presbyter ' are used in the New 
 Testament of the same officers) the presbyters 
 originally were also bishops, and it was because of 
 the dangers of rivalry and division which threatened 
 this arrangement from the first that it was deter- 
 mined that in future only one person should have the 
 authority and name of the episcopate, the rest re- 
 ceiving only the commission of presbyters. 1 How 
 much truth there is in this view is not now in ques- 
 andsome tion. They thought also that this original identity 
 milfe'the"'" f *ke P res t>yterate and episcopate had left its mark 
 subsequent on the subsequent constitution of the Church in such 
 
 difference. 
 
 sense that presbyters and bishops still share a 
 common priesthood, and that (waiving the question 
 of confirmation 2 ) there is nothing which is reserved 
 
 1 Jerome affirmed, as has been said, that the old constitution had in a measure 
 been maintained at Alexandria down to the third century. 
 
 2 The western councils strictly limit to bishops the consecration of the chrism. 
 St. Jerome makes no remark on the subject where he is speaking controversially on 
 the subject of bishops, but he assumes (adv. Lucifer. 9) the limitation of confirma- 
 tion to bishops in a sense which implies that under no circumstances, not even of 
 imminent death, could a presbyter confirm. At Alexandria, say the Comtnemator
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 161 
 
 to a bishop except the function of ordination. 1 
 Jerome used this view with powerful effect to exalt 
 the priesthood of the presbyter, as against the 
 arrogance of Roman deacons on the one hand, and 
 on the other against the overweening self-assertion 
 of bishops. It was a bad custom, he thought, which 
 prevailed in some Churches, that presbyters should 
 not be allowed to preach in the presence of bishops. 2 
 Their exalted dignity is a thorn in Jerome's side ; 
 ' as if they were placed in some lofty watch-tower, 
 they scarcely deign to look at us mortals or to speak 
 to their fellow-servants.' 3 A priest should indeed 
 ' be subject to his bishop [pontifex] as to his 
 spiritual father, but bishops should know that they 
 are priests, not lords, and if they wish their clergy to 
 treat them as bishops, they must give them their 
 proper honour.' 4 This is the animus in Jerome's 
 theory. 5 
 
 Now when we have clearly considered this view, 
 we shall see surely that it is not what it is sometimes 
 represented as being. It is not a ' presbyterian ' 
 view. It does indeed carry with it the conception of 
 the great church order being the priesthood ; it 
 emphasizes that the distinction of presbyter and 
 bishop is nothing compared to the distinction of 
 deacon and priest. Moreover, it involves a certain 
 tentativeness in the process by which the Apostles 
 are held to have established the church ministry ; it 
 
 and the author of the Quaestiones, a presbyter confirms (consignatorconsecrat) 
 if the bishop be absent, i.e. he uses the chrism which the bishop only can conse- 
 crate. See p. 125 n. 2 . 
 
 1 Cf. Chrysostom (on p. 147 n. 1 ) and Canons of Hippolytus (p. 136). 
 
 2 Ep. Hi. ad Nepot. 7 : ' Pessimae consuetudinis est in quibusdam ecclesiis tacere 
 presbyteros et praesentibus episcopis non loqui.' 
 
 3 in Gal. iv. 13. 4 Ep. Hi. 7. 
 
 5 'S. Hieronymus in aestu contentionis indulgere solet exaggerationibus 
 rhetoric^ (Morinus). 
 
 L
 
 1 62 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 admits a survival of an older constitution into the 
 This view later life of the Church. But it does not carry with 
 
 not un- 
 acceptable, it the idea that the presbyter, pure and simple, the 
 
 presbyter of the settled church constitution, has the 
 power under any circumstances to assume episcopal 
 functions. It teaches something quite different, viz. 
 that the earliest presbyters were ordained with 
 episcopal functions were, in fact, bishops as well as 
 presbyters till the subsequent ordination of presby- 
 ters without episcopal functions put an end to the 
 old arrangement and brought about not episcopacy 
 but what we have called monepiscopacy. 1 St. 
 Paul, says the Commentator, passes from the ordina- 
 tion of bishops to that of deacons, because the 
 ordination of a bishop and a presbyter is the same. 
 But this 'is' must be an 'historical present.' The 
 ordinations of a bishop and a presbyter were wholly 
 distinct in his day. ' In our day,' he says, a few lines 
 further on, ' there should be in a city seven deacons 
 and a certain number of presbyters and one bishop.' 
 Church authority had in fact restrained to one the 
 functions which at first were more widely extended, 
 and no one can at all enter into the feelings of the 
 early Church about ordination who does not perceive 
 how much stress they laid on church authority, as 
 conditioning a man's spiritual status. 2 
 
 ( 2 ) Canons (2) We need not dwell long on the western 
 councils. After the Carthaginian council in 256 A.D., 
 which simply echoes the mind of Cyprian on the 
 rebaptism of heretics and only gives us evidence we 
 
 1 See Thomassin Vetus et Nova Ecclesiae Disciplina p. i. lib. 5. c. i. 6. 
 
 2 Morinus sees the more modern representation of Jerome's view in the scholastic 
 opinion that the episcopate does not differ from the presbyterate in sacerdotal 
 character, but is an extension of the same character by the addition of a new 
 authority. The consecration of a bishop does not impose a new character, but only 
 superadds a new authority. See de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. iii. c. t.
 
 ill.] The Witness of Church History. 163 
 
 hardly need that Cyprian's view of the bishop's office 
 was also the view of his colleagues, the record of 
 western councils opens with that of Elvira (Illiberis) 
 in Andalusia, which occurred in the early years of 
 the fourth century, and that of Aries a representa- 
 tive western council in A.D. 314.* Both these 
 councils assume as a matter of course the sacer- 
 dotal ministry of the Church and the three orders of 
 bishops, presbyters, and deacons. 2 So far as they are 
 concerned with the ministry, they are occupied only 
 with the maintenance of discipline and the regulation 
 of inter-episcopal relations. 3 
 
 (3) When we turn to the Latin rites of ordination, ( ? ) Latin 
 we find a constant implication of the doctrine of the indiSte 5 
 priesthood and of the orders in the ministry of 
 
 1 Augustin even calls it a ' plenarium ecclesiae universae concilium.' 
 
 2 Episcopi, presbyteres et diacones (Elvira, cc. 18, 19; cf. 27, 75 and 
 Aries, cc. 20, 21): clerical office a status (Elvira, c. 53): the bishops sacerdotes 
 (Elvira, c. 48): the sacerdotal function sacrificare (Aries, c. 19). 
 
 3 E.g. there is the restraining of deacons in Aries, c. 18, whose arrogance we hear 
 of first in Cyprian's letters (Ep, iii. 3 : the deacon must ' honorem sacerdotis agnos- 
 cere '). In days of persecution deacons had been known even to offer the Eucharist 
 in many places, and this is curtly reprimanded : cf. Aries, c. 15 ' De diaconibus quos 
 cognovimus multis locis ofFerre, placuit minime fieri debere.' [There is no reason 
 whatever for thinking that this represents any remains of an earlier discipline. How 
 in days of persecution such an abuse should have sprung up is intelligible enough. 
 It must be remembered that the fourth century is full of lament over the decay of 
 discipline, as e.g. in Basil the Great, Ep. xc.] In Spain there is no trace of such a 
 license, but we hear of deacons in charge of congregations, as in later ages, and 
 Elvira c. 77 enacts thus : ' Si quis diaconus regens plebem sine episcopo vel presby- 
 tero aliquos baptizaverit, episcopus eos per benedictionem perficere debebit [i.e. 
 confirm] quod si ante de saeculo recesserint, sub fide qua quis credidit potent esse 
 iustus.' 
 
 Elvira c. 32 restrains to bishops the function of dealing with penitents ; only in 
 cases of necessity may a presbyter admit to communion, or even a deacon, if the 
 priest order him. Cf. Carthage, A.D. 390, cc. 3, 4 ; Hippo Regius, A.D. 393, c. 30. 
 Other canons concern clerical discipline (Elvira, c. 33, Aries, c. 2); the mutual rela- 
 tion of bishops (Elvira, cc. 53, 58, Aries, c. 17); the requirement of at least three 
 bishops to consecrate another (Aries, c. 20) ; the permission, in necessity, of lay bap- 
 tism, to be followed by episcopal confirmation (Elvira, c. 38). 
 
 We notice specially in later councils (e.g. Carthage, A.D. 390, cc. 3, 4 ; Hippo, 
 A.D. 393, c. 34 ; Toledo, A.D. 400, c.' 20) the limitation to bishops of the consecration 
 of the chrism. There was clearly a tendency in the presbyters to assume this 
 function.
 
 164 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 bishops, priests, and deacons. 1 The distinction 
 between these and the minor orders is marked in the 
 West by the subdeacon not receiving the laying-on 
 of hands. 2 It should be noticed in this connection 
 that the uniformity of idea which pervades the 
 the various rites of ordination (and in this respect 
 we may include the Greek with the Latin) makes a 
 great impression upon the mind. It is not indeed 
 the case that there is no change of ideas, but it is 
 not in any way fundamental. The conception of the 
 Christian pastorate and priesthood in succession to 
 the apostles is the constant element. 
 
 () increase Such change as appears is mainly of two sorts. 
 
 !" Sine? There is, first, the elaboration of ritual. It is im- 
 portant indeed to remind ourselves that a more 
 elaborate ritual of ordination does not necessarily 
 mean a deepening of the conception of what ordina- 
 tion brings with it. The earliest writing devoted to 
 the consideration of a Christian sacrament Ter- 
 tullian's treatise On Baptism is as full of belief in 
 the spiritual effect of the laver of regeneration as any 
 treatise of a mediaeval schoolman could be ; but he 
 makes it his special point that it is on account of the 
 real spiritual efficacy of Christian sacraments that 
 they do not need to be made impressive by outward 
 pomp. They can be simple, because they have so 
 real an inward grace attached to them. It is pagan 
 rites which need decking out with pomp and circum- 
 
 1 This statement is justified in App. Note C. The episcopate is called an ordo 
 (episcopatusordo) in the Gregorian Sacram. ap. Muratori Lit. Rom. Vet. 
 ii. p. 358. 
 
 2 So the so-called canons of the fourth council of Carthage ordained (c. 5 quoted 
 by Morinus de S. Ord. p. ii. q. 260). Cf. Isidore de JEccl. Off. ii. 10 ap. Hittorp. 
 p. 23: 'hi [sc. subdiacones] igitur cum ordinantur, sicut sacerdotes et Levitae, 
 manus impositionem non suscipiunt.' So Rabanus Maurus de Inst. Cler. \. 8 ap. 
 Hittorp. p. 316.
 
 III.] Tlie Witness of Church History. 165 
 
 stance, just because they have nothing else to trust 
 to for impressing men's minds. 1 The belief in 
 baptismal grace, then, did not grow with the elabora- 
 tion of baptismal ceremony. Just in the same way 
 it does not follow that, because ordination rites be- 
 came more complicated, the Christian Church was 
 growing to rate more highly the consecration which 
 they conveyed. To the last there remains in the 
 western office a reminder that, while outward pomp 
 was of the essence of the old priesthood, for the very 
 reason that that was essentially external and sym- 
 bolical, the essence of the new priesthood lies in 
 inward and spiritual reality. The prayer for the 
 consecration of a bishop calls to mind the glory of 
 the vestments of the Aaronic priesthood, and prays 
 that whatever those vestments signified by the 
 brilliancy of gold, by the splendour of gems, by the 
 variety of manifold workmanship, may shine forth 
 now in the characters of Christian bishops, and that 
 the precious ointment upon the head which runs 
 down unto the beard and goes down to the skirts 
 of the clothing may be to them the unction within, 
 and even without, of spiritual grace and spiritual 
 power. 2 
 
 Secondly, beside ritual adjuncts there is a certain {*) * growing 
 change in idea noticeable in the rites of ordination, ence in the 
 
 T ,./,. ... , ., priesthood 
 
 It consists chiefly in emphasizing the special sacer-ofthe 
 
 1 The passage is well worth quoting, de Bapt. z : ' Nihil adeo est, quod tarn 
 obduret mentes hominum, quam simplicitas divinorum operum quae in actu videtur 
 et magnificentia quae in effectu repromittitur : ut hie quoque quoniam tanta simplici- 
 tate sine pompa, sine apparatu novo aliquo, denique sine sumptu homo in aqua 
 demissus et inter pauca verba tinctus non multo vel nihilo mundior resurgit, eo in- 
 credibilis existimetur consecutio aeternitatis. Mentior, si non e contrario idolorum 
 sollemnia vel arcana ds suggestu et apparatu deque sumptu fidem et auctoritatem 
 sibi exstruunt. Pro misera incredulitas, quae denegas Deo proprietates suas, sim- 
 plicitatem et potestatem ! ' 
 
 - See App. Note C.
 
 1 66 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 dotal functions of the presbyter. Thus in the later 
 forms we have the commissions to the priest: 'Receive 
 power to offer sacrifice ' ; ' Receive the Holy Ghost : 
 whose sins thou dost remit, they are remitted, etc.' 
 Now these later forms are significant. There is 
 indeed nothing new in the conception of sacrifice or 
 of the power of absolution as belonging to the priest- 
 hood, nor is any new idea involved in the imperative 
 form of commission ; what is new is the specification 
 of them and especially of the latter in the case of 
 the presbyter. It belongs to a stage of church 
 organization in which the presbyter is regarded as 
 having a more independent priesthood, attaching to 
 him as an individual. In earlier days the priest- 
 hood is kept more closely in connection with the 
 Church or community. In the Church or community 
 the high priest or bishop exercises the sacerdotal 
 and pastoral functions, and the presbyters are attached 
 to him as ' co-operators of his order.' This idea of 
 co-operation is what is remarkably emphasized in 
 the early prayers for their ordination. Later 
 owing to the more independent position which the 
 circumstances of large dioceses gave to the presbyter 
 his substantive priesthood, inhering in him as an 
 individual, comes more to the front. A presbyter is 
 not so much a man who occupies a certain position 
 and grade in the hierarchy of the community ; he is 
 an individual with special powers. His priesthood 
 has become detached. 1 
 
 1 It will be useful at this point to quote some summary statements from western 
 writers of what belongs to the presbyter's office. Thus from St. Isidore, c. A.D. 620, 
 de Reel. Off. ii. 7 ap. Hittorp. p. 22 :' [Presbyteris] sicut episcopis dispensatio 
 mysteriorum Dei commissa est. Praesunt enim ecclesiis Christi et in confectione 
 divina corporis et sanguinis consortes cum episcopis sunt, similiter et in doctrina 
 populorum et in officio praedicandi.' He follows Jerome, and quotes him in saying 
 that only ordination is reserved to the bishop. But later (c. 25) he adds confirmation 
 (quoting Pope Innocent), ' nam presbyteri, licet sint sacerdotes, pontificatus tamen
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 167 
 
 Now the evidence which early Christian history conclusion 
 affords for the position of the ministry has been history from 
 passed in review. If reference is made to the four A ' 
 positions which were enunciated at the beginning of dpieoF "' 
 this chapter, it will be found that the two first to go s^ceLlon 
 at present no further have been thoroughly justified. a ^ 
 Everywhere we have found a ministry, recognised copate'wfth 
 as having authority by succession from the Apostles : p^werTof 
 everywhere the three distinct orders of bishop, universal! 1 ' 
 presbyter, and deacon : everywhere the limitation 
 to the episcopate of the power of ordination. The 
 only qualification which has to be made lies in the 
 recognition that a school of western writers held 
 
 apicem non habent. Hoc autem solis pontificibus deberi, ut vel consignent vel para- 
 cletum Spiritum tradant, quod non solum ecclesiastica consuetude demonstrat, 
 verum et superior ilia lectio apostolorum, etc. . . . Nam presbyteris, sive extra 
 episcopum, sive praesente episcopo baptizant, chrismate baptizatos ungere licet, sed 
 quod ab episcopo fuerit consecratum : non tamen frontem ex eodem oleo signare, 
 quod solis debetur episcopis, cum tradunt Spiritum paracletum.' When speaking of 
 penitence, he specifies ' sacerdotes ' as the ministers of it ' astante coram Deo sollem- 
 niter sacerdote' without mentioning whether bishop or presbyter (ii. 16). The 
 Ordo Roman-its (ap. Hittorp. p. 93) specifies offerre, benedicere, praeesse, 
 praedicare, baptizare, as the functions of the presbyter. Pseudo-Albinus 
 Flaccus (ap. Hittorp. p. 50), while repeating the older canon which allows a deacon 
 to receive confessions where there is no priest, makes the bishops or presbyters 
 ' quibus claves regni caelorum traditae sunt ' the proper ministers of the penitential 
 discipline. Rabanus Maurus (de Inst. Cler. ii. 30), while making bishop or presbyter 
 the minister of private confession, makes the bishop the minister of public penance, 
 and the bishop or presbyter at his desire (iussu tamen episcopi) the minister of 
 public absolution. 
 
 All this is summed up in canon 7 of the second council of Seville presided over by 
 Isidore A.D. 619 : ' Nam quamvis cum episcopis plurima [presbyteris] ministeriorum 
 communis sit dispensatio, quaedam tamen auctoritate veteris legis, quaedam novellis 
 ecclesiasticis regulis sibi prohibita noverint : sicut presbyterorum et diaconorum ac 
 virginum consecratio ; sicut constitutio altaris, benedictio vel unctio : siquidem nee 
 licere iis ecclesiam vel altarium consecrare ; nee per impositionem manus fidelibus 
 baptizatis vel conversis ex haeresibus paracletum Spiritum tradere ; nee chrisma con- 
 ficere, nee chrismate baptizatorum frontem signare ; sed nee publice quidem in missa 
 quemquam poenitentium reconciliare ; nee formatas cuilibet epistolas mittere. Haec 
 enim omnia illicita esse presbyteris, quia pontificatus apicem non habent, quod solis 
 debere episcopis auctoritate canonum praecipitur, ut per hoc et discretio graduum et 
 dignitatis fastigium summi pontificis demonstretur. Sed neque coram episcopo licere 
 presbyteris in baptisterium introire, neque praesente antistite iufantem tingere aut 
 signare, nee poenitentes sine praecepto episcopi sui reconciliare, nee eo praesente 
 sacramentum corporis et sanguinis Christi conficere, nee eo coram posito populum 
 docere vel benedicere aut salutare nee plebem utique exhortari. '
 
 1 68 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 that originally there had been no substantial dis- 
 tinction between a bishop and presbyter ; and one 
 of these writers affirms, in effect, that this state of 
 things continued in the Church of Alexandria into 
 the third century. It has however been pointed 
 out that in the view of these writers, so long as the 
 presbyters were understood to have episcopal powers 
 (either generally or under certain circumstances), there 
 was no separate ordination to the episcopate. 1 They 
 do not hold that episcopal functions could under any 
 circumstances be assumed by the later presbyters 
 of the settled church constitution, who have been 
 ordained as presbyters and nothing more and 
 would require a separate ordination to make them 
 bishops. 
 
 Evidence Some further points have still to be made good 
 in order to justify the remaining positions which we 
 enunciated at starting. 
 
 ii. That II. The Church did from the first, we maintain, 
 
 wasregarded regard ordination as a ' sacramental ' 2 rite, to which 
 
 any? was attached a special authorization or grace, of 
 
 which the laying-on of hands was the ' outward sign.' 
 
 On the other hand it has been recently urged that 
 
 1 St. Paul implies that normally a man will pass from one grade of the church 
 ministry up to another. This was always the canonical method ; see Apost. Const. 
 viii. 17. But ordinations per saltum, even to the episcopate, were known and 
 recognised in early days. See Denny and Lacey de hierarch. Anglican, p. 104. 
 
 2 I use this expression without exact definition of a sacrament. The conception 
 of ordination, for example, given by Rabanus Maurus, de Inst. Cler. \. 4-7, is 
 sacramental in the sense that the laying on of episcopal hands is regarded as an act 
 conferring certain mystical powers. Yet when he comes to speak (c. 24) of the 
 sacraments of the Church, he reckons three only : ' Sunt sacramenta baptismum et 
 chrisma, corpus et sanguis, quae ob id sacramenta dicuntur, quia sub tegumento 
 corporalium rerum virtus divina secretius salutem eorundem sacramentorum operatur: 
 unde et a secretis virtutibus vel sacris sacramenta dicuntur. Quae ideo fructuose 
 penes ecclesiam fiunt, quia sanctus in ea manens Spiritus eundem sacramentorum 
 latenter operatur effectum.' Earlier, however, St. Augustin had in substantially this 
 sense spoken freely of ordination as a sacrament. But I want to avoid, as much as 
 possible, the history of terminology.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History, 169 
 
 the idea of ' ordination ' in the earliest Church carried 
 with it only the association of official appointment, 
 such as belonged to contemporary secular society. 
 The words by which it is described 'were in use 
 to express appointment to civil office. When other 
 ideas than those of civil appointment came beyond 
 question to attach themselves to ecclesiastical ap- 
 pointment other words were used.' l This is a strange 
 argument in view of the history of Christian termino- 
 logy. ' Ecclesia ' was a common term enough in the 
 Greek language ; but did it carry to St. Paul no 
 special Christian associations? 'To break bread,' 
 ' to give thanks/ were common terms; but ' the bread 
 which we break/ St. Paul says, ' is the communion of 
 the body of Christ.' ' Baptism ' had common enough 
 associations in connection with pots and cups, brazen 
 vessels and tables ; but we could not therefore argue 
 that it was only when the sacrament of initiation 
 came to be known as ' the enlightenment ' or ' the 
 salvation/ that associations of spiritual power began 
 to be attached to it. 2 It is the earliest Christian 
 writings that are most suggestive in this respect. It 
 is the simplicity of the language in which Tertullian 
 speaks of Christian baptism and Justin describes the 
 Christian Eucharist, which throws into high relief 
 the profound conception which they entertained of 
 their spiritual efficacy. 3 So far as technical language 
 
 1 Dr. Hatch B. L. p. 129. In notes 33 and 34 he says : ' The words in use 
 in the first three centuries are x e 'P oro '' e ' l '> KadiaTai/cip, KArjpovcrftu, constituere, 
 ordinare. . . . After the first three centuries there were not only other words 
 of the same kind, e.g. irpoeAflecv, rpo<rye<r0ai, promoveri, praeferri, but also 
 Xetpoflereio-flai, iepacrflat, consecrari, benedici.' 
 
 2 Bingham Ant. xi. i, 4, 5. 
 
 3 Tertullian is quoted above. Justin Martyr's account of the Eucharist is studiedly 
 simple. There is no term which is not of common life, yet he concludes with the 
 well-known passage : ' We receive it not as common bread and common drink . . . 
 but we have been taught that the food . . . is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who 
 was made flesh ' (Apol. i. 65, 66).
 
 170 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 is concerned, certainly Christianity poured new wine 
 into old bottles. Accordingly, it will not at all 
 surprise us that the author of the Acts should speak 
 simply of Paul and Barnabas ' appointing ' elders in 
 every Church (^eiporovelif, Acts xiv. 23), or that 
 St. Paul should leave Titus to 'appoint' elders 
 (fcaBta-Taveiv, Tit. i. 5); and that we should elsewhere 
 be, as it were, let into the secret of such ' appointment ' 
 by St. Paul attributing it to the Holy Ghost (Acts 
 xx. 28), and speaking to Timothy of the gift or 
 special endowment of the Spirit ' which was in him 
 by means of the laying-on of his hands.' 
 
 We may recognise, further, that in the whole pro- 
 cess of her ordinations the Church seems to have 
 borrowed a good many elements from civil society 
 round about her. The elements of appointment to 
 civil offices ' were nomination, election, approval, and 
 the declaration of election by a competent officer' 
 the " renunciatio." ' Then there was the ' usurpatio 
 iuris'.; the consul or praetor designate, for example, 
 formally exercised his office and by exercising it 
 entered upon its legal tenure. 1 Now some of the 
 steps of this process belong to human nature and 
 would reproduce themselves in all appointments ; 
 but it is impossible to avoid tracing back to this 
 civil process some of the features of the Church's 
 later forms of ordination. If election, testimony, 
 examination, approval must necessarily have been 
 there, yet we need not have found, as in fact we do, 
 the ' renunciatio ' to be an element in the ordination 
 ceremony of the West, and still more of the East, 
 though in characteristic Christian language. 2 Further, 
 
 1 See Dr. Hatch B.L. p. 129 ; Diet. Chr. Ant. s.v. ORDINATION ii. pp. 1303-1507 . 
 
 2 Diet. Chr. Ant. ii. p. 1507 ; and below, App. Note C.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 171 
 
 the reading of the Gospel by the newly-ordained 
 deacon ; the ' concelebration ' of the newly-ordained 
 priest ; the enthronization of the bishop ; l the giving 
 to the persons ordained to the minor or (much later) 
 to the higher orders the 'instruments' of their 
 ministry all these ceremonies are probably enough 
 the Christian form of the 'usurpatio iuris.' 2 But all 
 these features in the ordination ceremonies of East 
 or West were additions of varying and uncertain date. 
 As what stamped the Christian ministry from the 
 
 1 Or earlier, his celebrating the Eucharist and consecrating oil etc. p. 133 n. 2 . 
 
 2 Morinus saw this, and seems to draw the right conclusion. He notes : 
 
 (1) The fundamental identity of the method of ordaining bishops, presbyters, and 
 deacons in East and West. 
 
 (2) The divergence with reference to the minor orders as they grew up : in the East 
 they were ordained with laying-on of hands, but in the West by the ' tradition of the 
 instruments ' of their office, with some appropriate injunction. (See, for the ordina- 
 tion of a reader, Canons of Hippolytus c. vii in this respect the Ap. Constitutions 
 deserts its Roman prototype and the canon of iv Carthage, quoted by Morinus 
 p. ii. p. 260: ' subdiaconus cum ordinatur, quia manus impositionem non 
 accipit, patenam de episcopi manu accipiat vacuam et calicem 
 vacuum; de manu vero archidiaconi urceolum cum aqua et mantile 
 et manutergium:' and so on for the other orders.) This he compares to the 
 method of assuming civil or military office by adopting or receiving the 'insignia.' 
 So e.g. Dio Cassius (Hist. Rom. Ixviii. 16) speaks of the giving of the sword by the 
 emperor as the method of appointing prefects of the praetorians : ore npOtrov -na 
 fie'AAoiri To>f Sopv<f>6ptav eTrapfeii/ TO fJ>os, o irapatavwtr6ai, O.VTOV e\prjv, clipeer, 
 tyvjuvwo'e re avrb xal acareiVat f<f>Tf AajSe TOVTO TO t'4>o;, tea, av /lev icaAtos ap\o>, 
 virep c/xov, av Si KCUCU? , KOLT' tVoG avnp XP^T7- Reimar says in his note : ' hinc peri- 
 phrasis praefecti praetorio e<' <j> TO f t<f>os Jp>, ap. Philostratum ' ; and gives references, 
 quoting also 'cum insigne potestatis, uti mos est, pugionemdaret' from 
 Victor. Caes. xiii. 9. 
 
 Morinus concludes that, whereas the higher spiritual orders which were derived 
 from the Apostles were always conferred in East and West by the apostolic method 
 (even though much later the ' traditio instrumentorum ' was added in their case too), 
 the minor orders, which were a gradual and utilitarian development, were imparted 
 differently in Eastand West, and in the West by ceremonies suggested by the method 
 of secular appointment (de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. xi. c. 5). This would be borne out by 
 the evidence recently adduced by Harnack connecting the development of the minor 
 orders in Rome with the reorganization of civil offices (Text. u. Untersvch. ii. band, 
 heft 5, pp. 97-103) : ' Die romische Gemeinde es verstanden hat . . . brauchbare 
 Elemente des Sacral- und Staatswesens zu adoptiren." He thinks the seven sub- 
 deacons were instituted, probably.by Fabian, to equalize the diaconate without 
 losing the sacred number with the fourteen newly-instituted curatores urbis. 
 Certainly the church organization was developed closely on the lines of the im perial 
 system, as convenience no doubt suggested.
 
 172 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 first had been the idea of divine mission and authori- 
 zation, so the rite which corresponds to this idea had 
 been all along the central and characteristic rite. 
 Derived from Jewish traditional practice but stamped 
 by the Apostles with a new significance, it was the 
 laying-on of hands accompanied no doubt from 
 the first with a prayer for the gift of the Holy 
 Spirit which consecrated and empowered the 
 minister in the Christian Church for his pastoral 
 charge. 1 
 
 in. That III. Now we approach the subject of the ' indelible 
 'character- character ' impressed by ordination. So far as church 
 t^ccom- ve officers are elected representatives and ministers of 
 the congregation, they would naturally be regarded, 
 and all down church history have been regarded, as 
 holding their place on terms of their good behaviour. 
 The disorderly cleric has been deposed. But this 
 does not exhaust the matter. The church officer is 
 also a representative of God : his ordination has given 
 him a divine commission and gift of grace ; and as 
 ' the gifts and calling of God are without repentance,' 
 so from this point of view it is necessary to regard 
 him who is once a priest as always a priest, whether 
 
 1 The 'laying-on of hands' in the Old Testament appears with a double signifi- 
 cance, (a) When the people laid their hands upon the Levites, when the priest or 
 the sacrificer laid his hand on the victim, the ceremony meant that the subject of it 
 was made a representative a substitute (Numb. viii. 10 ; Levit. xvi. 21, iii. 2-15, iv. 
 4-29). The Levites were to represent the people ; the victim was taken as a sub- 
 stitute for the offerer, (b) It expressed the idea of benediction (Gen. xlviii. 14), and 
 so specially it is used of Moses consecrating Joshua (Numb, xxvii. 18 ; Deut. xxxiv. 
 9: 'Joshua was full of the spirit of wisdom, for Moses had laid his hands upon 
 him'). It also became, before our Lord's time, the Jewish mode of appointing 
 magistrates and rabbis (Morinus de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. vii. c. 3), and they laid stress 
 upon a succession front Moses (ib. 8). The characteristic use of it in the New 
 Testament (apart from its use in healing, which however is symbolical) is by the 
 Apostles to convey the gift of the Holy Ghost (Acts viii. 17, xix. 6). Cf. the way in 
 which the apostolic succession is connected with the Jewish in the Clementine Ep. 
 Petri. See further, for the evidence and significance of the rite in the Christian 
 Church, App. Note G.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 173 
 
 he adorn his office or no. 1 The later doctrine of the 
 ' indelible character ' impressed by ordination in 
 common with baptism and confirmation, and the 
 clearly drawn distinction between valid and canonical 
 ordinations, were the final outcome in the West of 
 the conflict between these two principles involved 
 from the first in the position of the Christian 
 ministry. 
 
 We see these opposite principles at work in St. 
 Clement's Epistle. On the one hand, because the 
 presbyterate has been appointed from above and has 
 a divine authority, it is declared to be ' no light sin 
 to cast out of their episcopate those who have holily 
 and blamelessly offered the gifts.' 2 On the other 
 hand, it is implied that had these holders of the 
 sacred office been bad men, the Church, with whose 
 consent they hadj been elected, might have deposed 
 them from their charge. When Callistus, a bishop 
 of Rome in the beginning of the third century, 
 repudiates this idea, issuing his edict that 'if a bishop 
 sin, though it be a sin unto death, he may not be 
 removed ' he is stating the ' indelibility of ordina- 
 tion character ' 3 in a form against which the canonical 
 depositions of bishops, all down church history, are a 
 continuous protest. 
 
 In what sense then did the early Christian Church 
 hold this doctrine ? In such sense, first of all, that 
 there is no record from the beginning of church 
 
 1 Harnack states the conditions of the problem well in modification of Dr. Hatch 
 (die GeselUchaftsverfassung etc. p. 234 n. 13 ) : 'As far as concerns the bishops and 
 deacons, their activity was almost without control and ranked as charismatic. This, 
 without any doubt, carries with it the reason why the officers in the Christian com- 
 munities occupied from the beginning a position so wholly different from that held 
 by the officers in the flwuroi, or " guilds."' 
 
 2 Clem, ad Cor. 44. 
 
 3 Harnack I.e. p. 258. The words are (Hippolytus Re/. Otnn. ffaer. ix. 12) : oCros 
 eSoy/u<m(ref Sn-wf *! en-iVicoJros ojuaproi TI, el Kac irpb? 9a.va.Tov, /i) ieiv K
 
 174 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 history of the reordination of any one episcopally 
 ordained in the Church. Once let a man be ordained 
 to any office, and his ordination held good in every 
 Church where he offered satisfactory evidence of his 
 status. In the ' Canons of Hippolytus ' l this is 
 
 1 C. ix : ' Let him not be ordained again. ' The Apostolic Canons (8) condemns 
 to deposition any cleric who receives a second ordination, both him and his ordainer, 
 ' unless it should appear that his (first) ordination was from heretics ' ; the synod of 
 Capua, A.D. 391, forbade rebaptisms, reordinations, and translation of bishops, and 
 the canon was incorporated into the African collection (Hefele Conciliengcsch. 108) ; 
 so Theodoret tells us that a foolish monk, who was afraid he should be ordained 
 over again (having been ordained once without knowing it), was assured that ' it was 
 not possible to give him twice the same ordination ' (Rel. Hist, xiii ap. Migne Patrol. 
 Graec. Ixxxii. p. 1404) ; so the author of the Quaestiones in Vet. et Nov. Test. 
 assures us (Qu. ci.) : ' quamquam apud . . . Deum unicuique hie honor maneat, 
 qui decretus est singulis ecclesiarum officiis, ut qui diaconus est diaconihonorem 
 per omnes ecclesias habeat.' When bishops are forbidden to ordain clerics who 
 belong to other dioceses (Can. Nicaen. 16, cf. Can. Apost. 15 and later), this of course 
 means to a higher grade than they already held. Dr. Hatch's statement (Growth of 
 Ch. Inst. p. 36 ; cf. Diet. Chr. Ant. ii. p. 1479) that in early days ' the transference 
 of the officer of one Church to another . . . when allowed, involved reappointment, 
 or, as it would now be called, reordination,' is absolutely gratuitous and unsupported 
 by facts. 
 
 Dr. Hatch has repeatedly quoted, as evidence of a double ordination, an ' im- 
 portant Galatian inscription of A.D. 461, which speaks of one who filled the office of 
 presbyter twice ' (Corp. Inscr. Graec. No. 9259 : Sis yev6fj.fv os Trpecr/Surepos) ; cf. his 
 B.L. p. 137 n. 51 . Harnack accepts-this use of the inscription, I.e. p. 234 n. 13 . 
 
 On this I had remarked (ist and 2nd ed.) that (T) the whole inscription does not at 
 all support the sense that Dr. Hatch puts on it. A certain Tarasis there buried is 
 described as Sis yevoi*.fvos 7rpe<r/3* KCU irapafxoi/aptos 7rapoKCT)<7as ei> TO> TOTTW TOVTU>. 
 A rrapafiovapios (or Trpcxr/iovapios) is the Latin mansionarius. He is a ' residentiary ' 
 in charge of any institution belonging to the Church. This Tarasis was twice 
 appointed ' presbyter and residentiary ' of a particular church or monastery. There 
 is nothing here to suggest that he was twice ordained in the fifth century. A 
 similar expression (referring, I think, to one man) occurs twice in the Ordo Romanus 
 ap. Hittorp. pp. i, 10: 'presbyterio et mansionario.' 
 
 (2) It surely is important to remember that tombstone inscriptions all over the 
 world express a lax popular theology. This has been brought out lately by recent 
 investigations in the Christian sepulchral inscriptions of Egypt, Syria, and Asia. 
 Those of Phrygia, for example, perpetuate for a long time the pagan maledictions 
 on those who lay hands on the tomb. See Authority and Archaeology pp. 374, 421 ; 
 also an article by M. E. Revillout in the Revue Egyptologique, 1885, no. i. 
 
 But the inscription has now been re-edited (See Journal of Hellenic Studies, 
 Supplem. Paper i, ' Ecclesiastical sites in Isauria,' Macmillan, 1892, pp. 24-5), by 
 Mr. Headlam of All Souls. He takes Tdpeuris Sis together as = 'Tarasis, son of 
 Tarasis'; refers to Ramsay, Oxford Mag. vol. ix. No. 24 (1891), p. 411 ; and 
 Reinach, Epigr. Grecque, p. 508, and remarks : ' This idiom is so common, especially 
 in inscriptions of Asia Minor, that it is hardly necessary to give instances.' The 
 previous mistranslation taking Sis with yevoftevos as = twice appointed is described 
 (p. 18) as 'very natural to any scholar who was not acquainted with the study of 
 inscriptions.' The right translation, of course, remove!? all difficulty.
 
 ill.] The Witness of Church History. 175 
 
 laid down for presbyters : and, to take a somewhat 
 earlier instance, St. Peter is represented in the 
 Clementines as travelling about with some attendant 
 ' presbyters ' who are clearly conceived of as being 
 more than local officers as being presbyters wherever 
 they are. 1 Nor, again, when we hear of the reinstate- 
 ment of clergy who had been deposed, or who had 
 lapsed into heresy or schism, do we ever hear of their 
 reordination. It is not indeed until comparatively 
 late that we hear of any such case : for the severe 
 view which was taken of deadly sin in the clergy 
 forbade that they should resume their office, just as 
 it was forbidden to ' penitents ' to be ordained at all. 2 
 Such lapsed or deposed clergy were treated as laymen, thougb.de- 
 or, when their sin was grave, deprived even of lay ^^treatf 
 communion. 3 But after the middle of the fourth as laymen ' 
 century we have plenty of instances in which clergy, 
 who had become Arians, Nestorians, Pelagians, or 
 heretics of whatever sort, were readmitted to their 
 ' order,' always without reordination ; 4 and it is 
 noticeable that St. Basil, though holding that the 
 
 1 See Clem. Horn. vii. 2 : a?rb Ttov eiro^ieVuv avria irpc&fivTepiov eVa firi&Koirov 
 aurois KaTcurnjtraj (cf. 5, 8). 
 
 2 ' Nullum mihi occurrit exemplum spatio trecentorum et quinquaginta annorum 
 clerici catholic! ad haereticos transfugae post reyersionem ad ecclesiam cum ordinum 
 exercitio recepti ' (Morinus de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. v. 10. 2). Cf. Apost. Can. 26 : 
 /leTavorjo-a? <o? Aai'icb? ie^^i}, and Cyprian Ep. Iv. n : 'sic tamen admissus est 
 Trofimus ut laicus communicet, non . . . quasi locum sacerdotii usurpet. ' Morinus, 
 I.e., deals with some instances advanced in the opposite sense. 
 
 3 E.g. Can. Sardic. i : rjyovfj.ai fj.ri&t \tuKtov ex ftv TOUS TOIOVTOVS xprjwu Koiviaviav. 
 Cf. Cyprian Ep. Iii. i : ' Evaristum de episcopo iam nee laicum remansisse.' 
 
 * They are 'certainly not ordained again,' St. Augustin says (de Bapt. i. i. 2) ; cf. 
 Hefele Conciliengesch. 42 : ' They [i.e. the Massalians] were admitted on condition 
 of anathematizing their former errors. Morinus I.e. 7, 8 f. collects other instances. 
 The Council of Toledo in A.D. 633 (c. 28) gives the form for the restoration to their 
 order of some clergy who had been unjustly deposed. They are to receive their lost 
 orders, 'gradus amissos recipere, ' before the altar by a renewed reception of the 
 vestments or (in the case of subdeacons) instruments proper to their office ' ea in 
 reparationem sui recipiant, quae cum ordinarentur perceperant.' This is not 're- 
 ordination' technically, as Dr. Hatch calls it (Diet. Ckr. Attt. ii. p. 1520).
 
 176 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 clergy who fall away from the Church lose the power 
 of administering valid sacraments, still speaks of the 
 ordination gift as a permanent endowment. 1 
 
 On the other hand, it is quite certain that the 
 early Church did not draw the clear line which was 
 drawn later between the reality of the priesthood and 
 its regular exercise. The deposed priest was really 
 regarded as a layman. 2 And in the same way ordi- 
 and nations, which later would have been regarded as 
 
 uncanonical . . 11.1-1 
 
 ordinations uncanonical, were in early days regarded as invalid. 
 
 as invalid. -..-. i 1-111 
 
 Monnus expresses the matter admirably by saying, 
 'moraliter magis et civiliter de istis philosophati 
 sunt.' They thought of ordination, that is, in con- 
 nection with all its moral and social associations, as 
 part of the whole life of the Church; thus very 
 naturally, ' they did not regard the validity of the 
 ordination as lying merely in the character of the act, 
 but they took into account also the authority of the 
 Church and questions of moral expediency.' 3 The 
 word 'valid ' meant to them what, according to more 
 elaborated definitions, is expressed by both valid and 
 canonical. How could they believe an act done in 
 violation of the will of God to carry with it His 
 ratification and be valid ? So they reasoned, and so 
 reasoning they pronounced invalid (aicvpos, unratified) 
 an ordination of which, in later days, it would only 
 have been said : fieri non debet : factum valet.^ 
 
 1 Ep- clxxxviii : oi yap irpwrot ava\<api)(rcurTes mzpa -riav jraTt'pcoi/ lo"xoi / ra? \eipo- 
 Tovio? (cot 8ta rr}s 7ri0e'<re<i>s ilav \eipSiv avriov etxov TO papier/ma TO Trveu/xaTKCoc. 
 
 2 irfiravaOia TOV leArjpov is a common phrase. Cf. Diet. Chr. Ant, ii. p. 1520. 
 
 3 Morinus de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. v. cc. 9. 8, n. 2 ; cf. Bingham Ant, xvii. 2. 
 
 * aicvpot eo-T(o 17 \eipoTOvia, tcaOaipeiaOui. This is very frequent : cf. e.g. Can. 
 Apost. 36; Antioch. 13, 22; Sardic. 15; Constantin. 4; Chalcedon. 6. A person 
 who had thus received an ' invalid ' ordination became disqualified for the canonical 
 ministry, and the question of his reordination did not therefore often occur. But 
 the Church, as we shall see, accepted the Donatist ordinations. Before that the 
 Church's action is more doubtful.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 177 
 
 The great peril, however, of making the unworthi- Distinction 
 ness of the minister hinder the grace of the sacrament 'canonical; 
 soon became apparent, first in connection with bap- sk>wi y ' 
 tism. Thus the council at Aries 1 decreed for the thTweft ; 
 West the validity of heretical baptisms. But the 
 rigorism, which was always ready to ' make a man 
 an offender for a word' and then repudiate his 
 ministry, was still felt in the case of the Luciferians 
 and Donatists to be a real danger. Accordingly 
 Jerome and Augustin lead the way in extending 
 the principle of the decision at Aries, so as to admit 
 of the recognition of ordinations made by Arians, 
 
 The Council of Nicaea (i) rejected the baptism of the disciples of Paul of Samosata 
 (c. 19) on the ground, as Athanasius tells us, of their heresy not owing to their 
 use of a defective form (Bright, Notes on the Canons, p. 67). It therefore decreed 
 also that those, who had been amongst the Paulinist clergy and were yet considered 
 fit for church orders, should be first ' baptized afresh and then ordained by the 
 bishop of the catholic Church.' The repudiation of their baptism carried with it a 
 repudiation of their ordinations. 
 
 (2) With reference to the Novatian clergy (ot *a0apoi) the Council decreed ware 
 XeipofleTOVfieVous aurous /leveiv OVTWS ev TU K\rjo<a (c. 8). It has been disputed 
 whether this means that they should be reordained, or receive the imposition of 
 hands as a ceremony of reconciliation. The former interpretation seems perhaps of 
 the two the more probable ; see Bright, Notes, p. 25 f. But it is possible that the 
 bishops of the council did not accurately distinguish between a fresh ordination and 
 an act of reception by the Church which gave validity to an old one. They use 
 the words /le'veiy iv r<a xX^pw, and certainly the language does not suggest a new 
 ordination, such as the Paulianists needed. So in the same way the clergy ordained 
 by Meletius were allowed to retain their office (TIJIJJV icai \firovpyiav) when they 
 had been 'confirmed by a more sacred ordination ' (jivtrriKoyripa xeiporopta /3e/3cuu>- 
 Oerras, ap. Soc. H.E. L 9) ; this certainly suggests the idea of an act giving validity 
 to an old ordination, rather than a completely new ordination. (In a similar manner 
 the penitential laying-on of hands is regarded as a recovery of the gift of confirma- 
 tion, or identified with confirmation, Mason, Rel. of Ba.pt. to Conf. pp. 67, 101, 175, 
 179.) Later western councils receive clergy ordained amongst the Gothic Arians by 
 a similar laying-on of hands ' cum impositae manus benedict ione ' (i Cone. Aurel. 
 A.D. 511, c. 10), 'accepta denuo benedictione presbyteratus ' (Cone. Caesaraug. A.D. 
 592, c. i). In the context of the passage quoted above from Socrates there is a 
 clear recognition by the historian in the case of Meletius himself of the distinction 
 between being a bishop and being allowed to act as such. The council allowed him 
 (he says) to retain the <xia 1-779 7ri<T<coirijs, but took away the cot><ria TOV irparretv 
 avrov Tiva. us eTTiaKOiroy. 
 
 1 c. 8 : 'Si perviderint [haeretidum] in Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancto esse 
 baptizatum, manus ei tantum imponatur ut accipiat Spiritum sanctum.' c. 13 
 decided that the ordinations of 'traditor' clergy were valid. 
 
 M
 
 178 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 where the person so ordained gave satisfactory 
 evidence of his orthodoxy, or again by Donatists, 
 if their clergy would communicate again with the 
 Church on her terms. 1 
 
 And this was not a mere economical arrangement 
 in view of particular cases. It was based by St. 
 Augustin on general principles which would apply 
 in many directions the principle, namely, that ' the 
 sacrament of ordination remains in those who are 
 ordained ; and if from any fault a man be removed 
 from his office, yet he will not be without the Lord's 
 sacrament once imposed, though remaining now only 
 to condemn him ' ; 2 and the associated principle 
 
 1 This is the point of Jerome's argument against Lucifer. He has a beautiful 
 passage on the rarity of perfect faith, and the necessity therefore of recognising 
 that imperfect faith, is no obstacle to God's Spirit being administered ; 'fides, quae 
 etiam apud eos qui bene credunt difficile perfecta invenitur' (adv. Lt4cifer. 15). 
 He also presses the principle involved in the recognition of heretical baptism : 
 ' eadem ratione episcopum ab Arianis recipio qua tu recipis baptizatum ' (it. 14). 
 He does not, however, commit himself as Augustin does. 
 
 Augustin carries out the argument with great vigour, using in part and developing 
 Jerome's material, in his anti-Donatist writings. The question (he contends) what 
 a man believes who receives or administers the sacrament of baptism is of great 
 importance for his own salvation, but is wholly immaterial for its effect on the 
 sacrament ' ad quaestionem sacramenti ' (de Bapt. iii. 14). Sacraments ministered 
 by heretics are valid, but their benefits are suspended till those who receive them 
 come over to church unity (de Bapt. vii. 54. 103 ; c. Epist. Parnien. ii. 13. 29). 
 This is as true of ordination as of baptism ; as ordained men, if they secede and 
 return to the Church, ' are certainly not ordained again, but either again exercise 
 their former ministry, or if they do not exercise it at any rate retain the sacrament 
 of their ordination,' so also 'we do not dare to repudiate God's sacraments even 
 when administered in schism ' (de Bapt. 5. i. 2). So, with great clearness, c. Epist. 
 Parnien. ii. 13. 28 : 'nulla ostenditur causa cur ille, qui ipsum baptismum amittere 
 non potest, ius dandi potest amittere : utrumque enim sacramentum est : et quadam 
 consecratione utrumque homini datur, illud cum baptizatur, istud cum ordinatur. 
 Ideoque in catholica utrumque non licet iterari. Nam si quando ex ipsa parte 
 venientes etiam praepositi, pro bono pacis correcto schismatis errore suscepti sunt et 
 si visum est opus esse ut eadem officia gererent quae gerebant, non sunt rursum 
 ordinal! : sed sicut baptismus in eis, ita'ordinatio mansit integra : quia in praecisione 
 fuerat vitium quod unitatis pace correctum est, non in sacramentis, quae ubicunque 
 sunt ipsa sunt.' 
 
 2 de Bono Conjugali 24. 32 : ' Quemadmodum si fiat ordinatio cleri ad plebem 
 congregandam, etiamsi plebis congregatio non subsequatur, manet tamen in illis 
 ordinatis sacramentum ordinationis : et si aliqua culpa quisquam ab officio re- 
 moveatur, sacramento domini semel imposito non carebit, quamvis ad iudicium 
 permanente.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 179 
 
 transferred from baptism to ordination, that schism 
 and heresy do indeed destroy the spiritual value of 
 sacraments, but not their reality. This latter prin- O ni y parti- 
 ciple was not indeed generally admitted in the Ea^t. n ' 
 East, 1 nor was it quickly worked out to its results 
 in the West. Still it took root. Leo the Great, for 
 example, pronounces that some uncanonically conse- 
 crated bishops are no bishops at all? but ' pseudo- 
 episcopi.' But then he goes on to intimate that, 
 where their ordinations otherwise ' vain ' were 
 allowed by the canonical bishop, they could be 
 accepted as ' valid,' showing clearly that, though he 
 did not regard consecration with the proper form 
 as absolutely valid by itself apart from canonical 
 conditions, he yet did regard it as valid in such 
 sense as that church recognition, subsequently given, 
 might impart to it a retrospective validity. 
 
 In this uncertain and ambiguous position the 
 matter long remained. ' What is it,' says Morinus, 
 ' to track the controversy [on the validity of heretical 
 or schismatical or simoniacal ordinations] but to 
 exhibit bishops against bishops, councils against 
 councils, pontiffs against pontiffs, waging a Cad- 
 meian war ? ' 3 The Eastern Church has, in fact, 
 
 1 Not, e.g., by St. Basil. In Ep. clxxxviii he does not admit the principle of 
 the validity of baptism by sects who are in fundamental heresy on the doctrine of 
 God : nor quite thoroughly as regards the Novatians and Encratites, though some 
 of their ordinations had been allowed. He seems to regard it as a matter depending 
 on the Church' s judgment in any case : so eastern writers subsequently. 
 
 2 Ep. clxvii ad Rusticum inq. i : ' Nulla ratio sinit ut inter episcopos habeantur 
 qui nee a clericis sunt electi nee a plebibus sunt expetiti nee a provincialibus epis- 
 copis cum metropolitani iudicio consecrati. Unde, cum saepe quaestio de male 
 accepto honore nascatur, quis ambigat nequaquam istis esse tribuendum, quod non 
 docetur fuisse collatum? Si qui autem clerici ab istis pseudo-episcopis in eis 
 ecclesiis ordinal! sunt, qui ad proprios episcopos pertinebant, et ordinatio eorum 
 consensu et iudicio praesidentium facta est, potest rata haberi, ita ut in ipsis ecclesiis 
 perseverent : aliter autem vana habenda est creatio, quae nee loco fundata est nee 
 auctore munita.' 
 
 3 de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. v. 8. i.
 
 i8o Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 never got beyond the position that the Church has 
 the power to ratify in any particular case, or set of 
 cases, ordinations which in the West would be called 
 per se valid but uncanonical. 1 
 
 It can hardly be a subject for regret that the 
 Church should have exhibited considerable unwilling- 
 ness in isolating the consideration of the validity of 
 ordination from its context in the whole question of 
 what constitutes a right relation to the Church. It 
 cannot, however, be denied that the analogy of all 
 sacramental grace forced the Church to distinguish 
 between the gift that is in the man by the laying-on 
 of hands and its reverent or obedient exercise. It 
 must also be borne in mind, especially from the 
 point of view of our present argument, that whatever 
 hesitation was felt in accepting and formulating this 
 principle was due to the high regard in which 
 the ordination gift was held not to any dis- 
 paragement of it : so that there was at no time 
 any hesitation in recognising the indelibility of 
 orders, when imparted and exercised in obedience to 
 the Church. 
 
 iv. That use IV. It will be noticed that whereas the conception 
 
 termsYm- tal of the Christian ministry and pastorate of souls dates 
 
 lde e a d of ( the ew back behind our present period into the immemorial 
 
 ministry. p as t } it is only at the beginning of our period that 
 
 the title of the Priesthood begins to be applied to it. 
 
 Irenaeus and Clement do not speak of the Christian 
 
 ministers as priests, while Tertullian and Origen do, 
 
 so that it is only towards the end of the second 
 
 1 Morinus I.e. c. n. 4 : ' His cum praecedentibus comparatis, colligitur ecclesiam 
 orientalem varie pro variis temporibus haereticos admisisse. Constat enim 
 quibusdam temporibus, praesertim nascente haeresi, ut via planior ad reditum iis 
 sterneretur, certorum haereticorum ordinationes admisisse : aliis vero eas irritas 
 declarasse et iterasse.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 181 
 
 century that sacerdotal terms begin to be regularly l 
 applied to the clergy. 
 
 The question arises : Does this change of language 
 represent a change of ideas, or merely a readjustment 
 of terms in view of changed circumstances ? We 
 cannot argue always or absolutely from a gradual 
 change in language to a change in ideas. For Reasons for 
 
 i r ^1- L earlier 
 
 instance, we have every reason for supposing that abstinence. 
 the first Christians believed in the Divine Sonship 
 of Christ. A Christian of the first century, with the 
 teaching of the Apostles in his mind, when he under- 
 stood the controversy, would, we feel no doubt, have 
 sided unambiguously with St. Athanasius and not 
 with Arius ; and that not because Athanasius would 
 have persuaded him to give any new honour to 
 Christ, but because he would have seen easily 
 enough what his old faith implied : that it was 
 indeed the teaching of St. John and St. Paul about 
 Christ that He was ' God of God, very God of very 
 God.' But, on the other hand, this faith of the 
 Church could not be expressed so unreservedly in 
 the first age as in later times. ' Jesus is very God ' 
 was not the first truth to put before a Jew, but 
 ' Jesus is the Christ ' : this is the substance of the 
 first apostolic preaching as recorded in the Acts 
 the Messianic authority of Christ, not His divine 
 nature. ' Jesus is the Son of God ' was not the first 
 truth to preach to the heathen with their polytheism 
 and mythology, lest they should only too easily 
 incorporate Him into their Pantheon : the basis of 
 
 1 Dr. Lightfoot thinks Polycrates' description of St. John as ' a priest wearing 
 the mitre jre'ToAoi-' (ap. Euseb. H.E. v. 24) is perhaps the first instance of sacer- 
 dotal language being applied to the Christian ministry. But we have the expression 
 in the Didache xiii. 3 : ' they are your high priests.' For the Canons of Hippolytus 
 see p. 138 n. 1 .
 
 1 82 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 monotheism must be firmly laid before the Divine 
 Sonship of Christ can be securely preached. 1 There 
 is then a change of terminology which means a 
 change of circumstances rather than of ideas. To 
 take another instance from the records of the lan- 
 guage of the early Church. The early apologists 
 believed in a Christian sacrifice in the Eucharist ; 
 if the sense in which they did so may be discussed, 
 the fact is undoubted. But Justin Martyr, who ex- 
 presses his appreciation of the eucharistic sacrifice 
 to Trypho the Jew, denies to the heathen emperor 
 that God needs material oblations. 2 Athenagoras 
 makes the same denial, and then puts in parentheti- 
 cally as it were under his breath 'and yet we 
 must offer a bloodless sacrifice and bring before God 
 the spiritual service.' 3 The Christian in fact had, or 
 had not, a sacrifice according as the term was used 
 in one sense or in another. The same seems to have 
 been true of the priesthood. ' It would only have 
 caused confusion,' Mr. Simcox justly says, 4 ' when 
 " a great company of the priests was obedient to the 
 faith," to have said that St. Barnabas was a priest, 
 when he was in fact a Levite.' The term ' priest ' 
 indeed carried with it many associations, Jewish and 
 pagan, which did not belong to Christianity. Out- 
 side the Epistle to the Hebrews Christ is not termed 
 a priest, and even there it is said : ' if He were on 
 earth He would not be a priest at all, seeing there 
 are those who offer the gifts according to the law.' 5 
 So, too, it is conceivable that a Christian missionary 
 of our own day might find it necessary, amidst the 
 
 1 See St. Paul's first preaching to heathen, Acts xiv. 14-18 and xvii. 22-31. 
 
 2 Dial. c. Tryph. 117 (cf. 22); Apol. i. 10. 
 
 3 Legal. 13 : KGUTOI irpoox^epeiv Se'ov dvaifiaicrov Overlap icat TIJV AoyiKTji' npoa'ayeiv 
 Aarpet'ac. * Early Church History p. 59. 5 Hebr. viii. 4 (R.V.).
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History, 183 
 
 associations of a pagan priesthood, to emphasize by 
 the avoidance of the term the points of difference in the 
 Christian ministry : just as it would have been wiser at 
 times to have produced a monotheistic atmosphere 
 as a preparation for preaching the divinity of Christ. 
 But when once the Christian atmosphere has been 
 cleared, when once the unique high-priesthood of 
 Christ is realized and the communication of that 
 priesthood to the Church, it becomes natural to 
 apply the term ' priest ' to the divinely ordained 
 ministers of this priestly congregation. As this 
 special application has been shown in the last chapter 
 to involve no loss of the general conception of the 
 ' high-priestly race,' so also it carries with it no change 
 of ideas about the ministry. The bishops whom 
 Clement speaks of as ' offering the gifts ' in the 
 spiritual temple of the Church, under Christ 'the 
 high-priest of our oblations,' may as well as not be 
 called priests. Hippolytus expresses by the term 
 ' the high-priesthood ' exactly the same idea of the 
 episcopate as is expressed by Irenaeus without its 
 use. 1 Ignatius, who does not call the Christian 
 officers priests, emphasizes their authority more than 
 Origen, who uses the term freely, and not less than 
 Cyprian. There is an overstrained expression of 
 
 1 See App. Note G. It is important to notice the triple derivation of 
 sacerdotal language. There is (i) the idea of the high-priesthood of Truth. The 
 term high priest is applied thus to the prophet (DidacJte xiii. 3), or to the bishop as 
 sitting in the chair of the prophetic teacher (Hippolyt. Ref. Ontn. Haer. prooem. 
 and ithe Clementines). There is (2) the idea of the high-priesthood of Sacrifice 
 realized in the Church through the mediation of Christ. This is the idea of priest- 
 hood in the Epistle to the Hebrews, in Clement of Rome, in Justin Martyr, in 
 Irenaeus ; and the term priest came to be applied in this sense to the bishop or 
 presbyter as to him 'who offers the gifts.' It is noticeable that the unity of 
 prophecy and priesthood underlies the use of the sacerdotal term Aeiroupyelv TU> 
 Kvpuo of the prophets in Acts rfiii. 2. There is (3) the idea of the Power of the Keys 
 the authority to bind and loose in the Christian society, belonging to the bishop 
 with the presbyters, as it is emphasized in the Clementines.
 
 1 84 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 sacerdotal authority in the Apostolical Constitutions \ 
 but this comes from a slight hardening of Ignatius's 
 teaching and is in no apparent connection with the 
 change in terms. On the other hand, the Fathers are 
 not, generally speaking, chargeable with a false 
 conception of the priestly office ; but (as these pages 
 will have shown) in the old offices of ordination, in 
 the writings on the pastoral charge and in the early 
 canons the idea is kept in due proportion and 
 harmony with the whole of church life and spiritual 
 truth. If the Church is a high-priestly race, and if 
 in the Church there is a ministry of divine authority 
 both in the communication of God's gifts to man 
 and in the offering of man's gifts to God, that ministry 
 can quite legitimately be called a priesthood. 1 
 
 V. We may claim now to have fairly substantiated 
 the four fundamental positions which were pro- 
 1 exclusive.- p Oun( j ec i at fa e opening of this chapter. It is still 
 however necessary, in order to make our case com- 
 plete, to refer to the exclusive character attributed to 
 the powers of the ministry, and attributed to them, 
 as far as the evidence goes, from the first. 
 
 A positive claim is in a certain sense necessarily 
 also exclusive ; the position involves a negation. ' I 
 
 1 Dr. Moberly (Ministerial Priesthood, Murray, 1897) has lately done the 
 Church an immense service by at the same time vindicating the institution of the 
 priestly ministry in the Church and also insisting on a right conception of it. In 
 particular he insists that the authority to offer the eucharistic sacrifice does not 
 admit of being isolated from the other (pastoral) functions of the ministry, and 
 represented as substantially constituting priesthood as was done in the later Roman 
 tradition without moral or intellectual disaster. The Christian priest is the 
 Christian pastor. And Dr. Sanday has written with reference to this book : ' When 
 the doctrine of a " sacrificing priesthood " is presented in this way, I confess that I do 
 not see why any of us should quarrel with it. I do not think that we do quarrel with 
 it. If that sainted bishop [Lightfoot] who brought out the store of his learning to 
 combat what is generally known as "sacerdotalism " could arise and be questioned, 
 and have the theory of "Ministerial Priesthood " set before him, I fully believe that 
 he would not condemn but welcome it.' Conception of Priesthood (Longmans, 1899) 
 p. 92.
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 185 
 
 am empowered by ordination to minister' implies 
 that 'you who have no such ordination have no such 
 power.' The church ministry made, then, an exclusive 
 claim. This, of course, needs qualification ; however 
 much the office of teaching or baptizing was kept 
 under the bishop's control and practically confined 
 to the clergy, still lay baptism was generally regarded 
 as valid and allowable in circumstances of necessity, 1 
 while lay teaching also was from time to time per- 
 mitted. 2 Ambrosiaster tells us, as has been noticed 
 already, that there was at first greater freedom in this 
 respect. But, though this be admitted, it is still true 
 to say that certain functions have been regarded as 
 confined to certain church officers, in such sense as that 
 others cannot validly perform them. Thus St. Jerome 
 writes : ' Since Hilary, a deacon, has withdrawn from 
 the Church, a world in himself as he imagines, he 
 can neither consecrate a eucharist (for he has neither 
 bishops nor presbyters) nor without a eucharist hand 
 on baptism ; and when the individual is dead, his sect 
 is gone with him ; for, as a deacon, he could ordain 
 no clergyman after him. And that is no Church which 
 has no priests.' 3 Again, the eighteenth canon of 
 
 1 Cf. e.g. Tertull. de Bapt. 17 ; Council of Elvira, c. 38. Jerome (adv. Lucifer. 9) 
 says : ' Inde venit, ut sine chrismate et episcopi iussione neque presbyter neque 
 diaconus ius habeant baptizandi. Quod frequenter, si tamen necessitas cogit, 
 scimus etiam licere laicis.' 
 
 2 Apost. Const, viii. 32. 15 : 6 SiSdcncuv, et (cot Acuicbs eiT), e/iireipos 5e TOV \6yov KOU. 
 TOV Tftoirov <Tfii'd, StSaa-itfTta. See note (32) in Migne Patrol. Graec. i. p. 1132. 
 
 3 Jerome adv. Lucif. 21 : ' He cannot without a eucharist hand on baptism,' be- 
 cause ' baptism ' is used to include confirmation, and confirmation can be administered 
 only by a bishop ; see adv. Lucif. 9, (the chapter in which occurs the admission, 
 just quoted, of baptism, in the narrower sense, by a layman) ' baptizatus nisi per 
 manum episcopi noa accipiet Spiritum Sanctum quern nos asserimtts in vero 
 baptismate triirui.' The chrism for confirmation is specially connected with the 
 eucharist and the altar in Cyprian, p. 70. 2 : ' Ungi quoque necesse est eum qui 
 baptizatus est, ut accepto chrismate jd est unctione esse unctus Dei et habere in se 
 gratiam Christi possit. Porro autem eucharistia est unde baptizati unguuntur oleum 
 in altari sanctificatum. Sanctificare autem non potuit olei creaturam qui nee altare 
 habuit nee ecclesiam ' ; see on both passages Mason, Relation of Confirmation to 
 Baptism, pp. 68, 168.
 
 1 86 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Nicaea distinguishes between the deacons ' who have 
 not the authority to offer ' and the presbyters who 
 have. This, of course, represents the common 
 doctrine ; only a priest can offer or consecrate the 
 Eucharist, as only a bishop can ordain. But it is 
 sometimes urged that this is a later conception in 
 the Church : earlier, as in Ignatius and Clement, you 
 have the conception of the authority of the ministry 
 strongly developed, but without this ' sacerdotal ex- 
 clusiveness.' ' Let that be esteemed a valid Euchar- 
 ist,' Ignatius says, ' which is celebrated under the 
 bishop or his delegate ; ... it is not lawful, apart 
 from the bishop, to baptize or celebrate a love- 
 feast ' : * but here, it is urged, the idea is simply that 
 a sacrament must be duly authorized ; and this would 
 be quite compatible with the validity of a lay 
 Eucharist, if only the layman had authority given 
 him to celebrate it. It was a question of order not 
 of exclusive grace. 
 
 The rights of Now it is perfectly true that in the first age the 
 a maueTo7 dominant idea was that of Church order. 2 The priest- 
 hood was not, as much as in later days, regarded as 
 an endowment of the individual. There was not the 
 same distinction drawn between what was valid and 
 what was canonical. On this point enough has 
 but also of already been said. But it is obvious that the con- 
 ception of church order is capable of embracing what 
 is included in both the terms ' canonical ' and ' valid.' 
 Thus the language of Ignatius about the Eucharist is 
 
 1 ad Smyrn. 8; see however further, in chap, vi., for Ignatius's whole 
 conception. 
 
 2 Cf. Tertull. de Bapt. ^^ '. ' Dandi quidem [baptismum] habet ius summus 
 sacerdos, qui est episcopus : dehinc presbyter! et diaconi, non tamen sine episcopi 
 auctoritate, propter ecclesiae honorem, quo salvo salva pax est.' Cf. Jerome, in note 
 above : and [Ambrose] de Sacramentis iii. 1.4:' exordium ministerii a summo est 
 sacerdote.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 187 
 
 capable of covering the position that only a presbyter 
 can have the bishop's license to consecrate, even if it 
 also covers the position that a presbyter's celebration, 
 apart from episcopal authority, would lack validity. 
 And we certainly find that Clement assigns the 
 ' offering of the gifts ' to the episcopal (or presbyteral) 
 office, and speaks of each order as having its own 
 limited functions in the celebration of the Eucharist 
 by divine appointment. 1 Again, when we go further 
 back, we find in the Acts the idea of exclusive 
 function : for, though nothing is said about the 
 Eucharist in particular, only the apostle, or perhaps 
 also the prophet, can lay on hands to give the gift of 
 the Holy Ghost. And so, in special connection with 
 ordination, St. Paul speaks of Timothy as empowered 
 by a gift of grace given to him as an individual by 
 the laying-on of hands, and presumably conveyed by 
 him to those on whom he is directed to lay hands 
 after the apostolic pattern. 2 It does not the least 
 follow that, because Ignatius and Clement press the 
 idea of divine order, they ignore the reality of ordina- 
 tion grace, which as positive is also exclusive. It is, 
 of course, a fact that there is much more early 
 evidence for the general position that no ministry 
 was acknowledged in the Church which was not per- 
 formed in accordance with church order, and for the 
 principle of special positive powers conveyed to 
 individuals by ordination, than there is for the 
 particular limitation to presbyters of the celebration 
 of the Eucharist : but it is a false supposition (con- 
 sidering the traditional character of the Church) that 
 
 1 ad Cor. 40 ; see further in chap. vi. 
 
 2 The argument is the same, for our present purpose, if the Acts and Pastoral 
 Epistles are relegated to the second century.
 
 1 88 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 an institution or limitation only began to exist when 
 
 we happen first to hear of it. 1 
 
 Have we, then, any reason to believe that a layman 
 
 would in any age have been allowed to celebrate the 
 
 eucharist even in case of necessity? Yes, it is at 
 Tertuiiian's once answered : Tertullian says so. 2 It is in a 
 contrary e Montanist treatise, where he is arguing, in the severe 
 
 spirit of that body, against the lawfulness of second 
 
 marriages. His opponent is supposed to urge that 
 
 they are forbidden only to priests. 
 
 ' Vain,' replies Tertullian, ' shall we be if we think that what is not 
 lawful for priests is lawful for laics. Are not even we laics priests ? 
 (Rev. i. 6 quoted.) It is the authority of the Church which makes a 
 difference between the order and the people. . . . Thus, where there 
 is no bench of clergy, you offer and baptize and are priest alone for 
 yourself. Nay, where three are, there is a Church, although they be 
 laics. . . . Therefore, if you have the rights of a priest in your person 
 when it is necessary, it behoves you to have likewise the discipline of 
 a priest when it is necessary to use his right. If you are a digamist, 
 can you baptize ? can you offer ? How much more capital a crime is it 
 for the digamist laic to act for the priest, when the priest himself, if 
 he turn digamist, is deprived of the power of acting as priest ? ' 8 
 
 1 It must have been a surprise to many people to find in the Didache the obser- 
 vance of the Wednesday and Friday fasts and of trine affusion. Cf. Harnack in 
 Expositor, May 1887, p. 321. 
 
 2 When Clement of Alexandria says of the Christian : tcrn-epas Se ai/aira.vcraa-0cu 
 KaOi)Ket. /A6Ta TT\V to'Tia.o'iv Kal juera T<}V CTT! T<U? a.Troh.a.va'eai.v euxapioTiW {Pacd. ii. 
 10. 96), he is referring to the ' grace ' for the supper. EvxapctrTeii/ long continued to 
 be used for ' saying grace ' in the chutrch of Alexandria ; cf. pseudo- Athan. de Virgin. 
 12 : e<r0ie TOV aprov <row evx a P to " n )' a< '' a T V " 6l ? ' 7rt T ') s rpaire'jJVjs <rov (and so three 
 times in c. 13). Dr. Bigg's suggestion of a domestic ' Eucharist" with only the head 
 of the house to celebrate it (B.L. p. 103 n. 2 ) seems, therefore, gratuitous, and is not 
 borne out by the words of Clement. 
 
 3 de Exhort. Cast. ^ : ' Vani erimus, si putaverimus quod sacerdotibus non liceat 
 laicis licere. Nonne et laici sacerdotes sumus? Scriptum est : Regnum quoque nos 
 et sacerdotes Deo et Patri suo fecit. Differentiam inter ordinem et plebem constituit 
 ecclesiae auctoritas et honor per ordinis concessum sanctificatus. Adeo ubi ecclesi- 
 astici ordinis non est consessus, et offers et tinguis et sacerdos es tibi solus. Sed ubi 
 tres, ecclesia est, licet laici. Unusquisque enim de sua fide vivit, nee est personarum 
 acceptio apud Deum : quoniam non auditores legis justificabuntur a Deo, sed factores, 
 secundum quod et apostolus dixit. Igitur si habes ius sacerdotis in temetipso ubi 
 necesse est, habeas oportet etiam disciplinam sacerdotis, ubi necesse est habere ius 
 sacerdotis. Digamus tinguis ? digamus offers ? quanto magis laico digamo capitale 
 erit agere pro sacerdote, cum ipsi sacerdoti digamo auferatur agere sacerdotem?'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. \ 89 
 
 Tertullian is here confessedly speaking about 
 abnormal cases, and in this same treatise he speaks 
 of a man offering the eucharist under usual circum- 
 stances for his wife or wives departed by the hands 
 of the priest per sacerdotem. 1 At the same time 
 there is no doubt about his meaning ; and if this 
 passage could be fairly quoted as evidence of the 
 mind of the Church at the time, it would go at least 
 to show that while the right of the layman to baptize, 
 in cases of necessity, was rather grudgingly conceded, 
 there was no sharp line yet drawn in respect of his 
 powers between baptism and the eucharist. But 
 though we grant this, it is, on the other hand, certainly 
 not the case that this passage can be fairly quoted as 
 illustrating the mind of the Church at all. Tertullian, follows from 
 
 f , .. ,., .,. -hisMontan- 
 
 m fact, is writing as a Montanist ; J that is as one 01 ist position. 
 
 a body which was setting itself against the Church as 
 
 in other respects, so also in reference to the authority 
 
 of the episcopal ministry. 3 He had himself, before he 
 
 became a Montanist, adopted a different tone. He 
 
 had made carelessness about sacerdotal distinctions 
 
 the very characteristic of heretical bodies. 
 
 'Their ordinations are heedless, capricious, changeable. At one 
 
 1 ib. ii : ' Offeres pro duabus et commendabis illas duas/tr sacerdotem de mono- 
 gamia ordinatum ? ' 
 
 3 There is no doubt about this, for a prophecy of Prisca is quoted (de Exh. Cast. 
 10) : ' Item per sanctam prophetidem Priscam ita evangelizatur, quod sanctus minister 
 sanctimoniam noverit ministrare. Purificantia enim concordat, ait, et visiones vident 
 et ponentes faciem deorsum etiam voces audiunt manifestas, tarn salutares quam et 
 occultas. 1 There can be little doubt that these words belong to the true text : (so 
 Bonwetsch Montanismus, p. 198). 
 
 3 Tertullian speaks of course as if his opponent would grant his position. But 
 Tertullian though he is a very powerful is not a fair arguer, and it cannot be the least 
 concluded that, when Tertullian uses or implies a ' Nonne,' his opponent would have 
 answered ' Yes." It needs to be remembered further that, on all showing, a private 
 Christian of Tertullian's day could receive the sacrament at home, Ad -ux. ii. 5. 
 Thus he could ' play the priest for himself,' at least by giving himself the sacrament. 
 It is not impossible that Tertullian "has nothing more than this behind his argument. 
 As indeed such a custom seems to remove all excuse for any further concession to the 
 laity.
 
 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 time they put novices in office ; at another, men involved in secular 
 employment ; at another, men who have apostatized from us. ... And 
 so it comes about that one man is a bishop with them to-day, another 
 to-morrow ; to-day a man is a deacon, and to-morrow a reader ; to-day 
 a presbyter, and to-morrow a layman ; for they impose even on laymen 
 the functions of the priesthood? 1 
 
 The tone here is undoubtedly different. Again, 
 in another treatise, he makes it part of the un- 
 written but authoritative tradition of the Church, 
 that only the 'presidents' that is, no doubt, 
 the bishop and presbyters should administer the 
 eucharist. 2 The statement, then, that Tertullian 
 makes as to the power of the layman ' to offer,' in 
 cases of necessity, can no more be admitted as 
 evidence of what the Church would have granted, 
 than similar appeals made by Waldensians or 
 Wesleyans of later days. 
 
 character- It is, however, necessary to explain a little more 
 western fully the position of the Montanists, and that especi- 
 ally in order to refute the notion that, in their claim 
 to dispense with the church ministry, they represented 
 in any way an older and fast vanishing ' freedom of 
 the spirit.' 3 
 
 1 de Praescr. 41. For the Latin, see p. 115 n. 1 . 
 
 2 de Corona 3,4:' Eucharistiae sacramentum et in tempore victus et omnibus 
 mandatum a Domino, etiam antelucanis coetibus, nee de aliorum manu quam 
 praesidentium sumimus.' He then proceeds to argue on the authority of the 
 Church traditions, and on their claim to obedience; 'harum et aliarum eiusmodi 
 disciplinarum si legem expostules scripturarum, nullam invenies : traditio tibi 
 praetendetur auctrix, consuetude confirmatrix et fides observatrix. 
 Rationem tradition! et consuetudini et fidei patrocinaturam aut ipse perspicies aut ab 
 aliquo qui perspexerit disces : interim nonnullam esse credes, cui debeatur 
 obsequium.' Thus he makes this limitation of the distribution of the eucharistic 
 sacrament to the clergy one of many immemorial traditions of the Church ; and he 
 speaks of the authoritativeness of church customs in a tone so different to what is to 
 be quoted from the de Virginibus Velandis that, though the de Corona has some of 
 the Montanist rigorism about it and dates not before the end of the century, it 
 cannot belong to his latest and most Montanist period. The contemporary Canons 
 of Hippolytus expressly exclude the layman even from making the sign of the cross 
 over the bread at the love-feast, c. xxxv. 
 
 3 'The fact of the existence of Montanism," Dr. Hatch says (. L. p. 125), 
 'strongly confirms the general inferences which are drawn from other evidence,
 
 ill.] The Witness of Church History. 191 
 
 Montanism, then, as represented by Tertullian, (o rigorism; 
 had two chief characteristics. 1 First, it was a move- 
 ment characterized by an intense ascetic rigorism. 
 Tertullian, who had deplored 2 but not corrected 
 his own impatience, was drawn into its ranks, as 
 men of impatient, undisciplined zeal have been drawn 
 in every age into puritan or Novatian parties. In 
 this spirit, it was opposed to the laxer or more 
 merciful tendencies of the authorities of the Roman 
 Church of that day. 3 ' I hear,' says Tertullian with 
 bitter scorn, 4 ' that an edict has been issued, and that 
 a peremptory one. That " pontifex maximus," that 
 bishop of bishops, 5 decrees: I forgive the sins of 
 adultery and fornication to those who have performed 
 penance.' This readiness to grant absolution for 
 even the worst sins the Montanists intensely resented. 
 Further, the Montanist discipline involved special 
 fasts and special restrictions on marriage and other 
 ascetic rules for laity, no less than clergy which 
 find in Tertullian a vigorous advocate, and which 
 enable him to heap contempt on the more ordinary 
 standards of living, which were reckoned sufficient 
 among churchmen or ' natural men,' as the Montan- 
 ists called them. 
 
 The second characteristic of western Montanism, (2) belief in 
 which it had derived from its Phrygian parentage, prophets, 1 
 
 that church officers were originally regarded as existing for the good government 
 of the community and for the general management of its affairs . . . that the func- 
 tions which the officers performed were such as, apart from the question of order, 
 might be performed by any member of the community.' 
 
 1 On the Montanist movement generally, see App. Note H. 
 
 - This is what gives such pathos to his treatise de Patientia, 
 
 3 The view of the policy of the Roman Church which Mr. Pater gives in Afarius 
 the Epicurean is so far justified by the number of reactionary movements which 
 history connects with the names of Tertullian, Hippolytus, and Novatian. 
 
 * de Pvdic. i. 
 
 5 The first title no doubt implies the paganism of the proceedings, and the second 
 its arbitrariness, in Tertullian's judgment.
 
 192 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 was a belief in the ' new prophets.' There had been 
 in the persons of the first Montanist prophets a new 
 outpouring of the prophetic spirit. They had been 
 the subjects of a new and absolute inspiration ; and 
 still (though they were gone) the Montanist society 
 had brethren with ' the gift of revelations/ who saw 
 visions and had access to divine truth denied to 
 andconse- common men. Men who believe themselves inspired 
 
 quent dis- 11- 
 
 paragement naturally tend to despise mere church officers who 
 
 of the regular 11- AII-I 
 
 ministry. make no such claim. And, besides, the church 
 officers in the East first, and later in the West, had 
 judged and repudiated this claim to inspiration 
 The Church of the ' natural men ' had, according to 
 the Montanists, rejected the Spirit. 1 It will not 
 therefore at all surprise us that the Montanists should 
 have regarded their inspired prophets as organs of 
 spiritual power, in the possession of whom they were 
 enabled to despise the bishops with their official 
 claims. The Church never expressed any opinion 
 on the rights which could be recognised in genuine 
 prophets, but she denied that these men were 
 prophets of God at all. Hence the tone of antagon- 
 ism. Tertullian is still speaking of the episcopal 
 edict. ' You say,' he argues, 2 ' that the Church has 
 the power of forgiving sins. This I acknowledge 
 more than you and determine I, who have the 
 Paraclete Himself in the person of the new prophets 
 saying " the Church can forgive the sin, but I will not 
 do it lest they commit others withal." ' The claim 
 to the power of absolution in the Church was based 
 on our Lord's promise to St. Peter, and Tertullian 
 
 1 See T.ertull. adv. Prax. i and App. Note H. 
 
 '2 tie Pudic. 21 : ' Sed habet, inquis, potestatem ecclesia delicta donandi ? Hoc 
 ego magis et agnosco et dispono, qui ipsum Paracletum in prophetis novis habeo 
 dicentem : Potest ecclesia donare delictum, sed non faciam, ne et alia delinquant.'
 
 III.] TJie Witness of Church History. 193 
 
 proceeds to examine the promise and declares that 
 it was given to St. Peter only as an individual. The 
 promised power, therefore, of binding and loosing 
 has nothing to do with those who claim to inherit it. 
 
 ' Now, then, what has this power to do with the Church, with your 
 Church forsooth, mere natural man? For, in accordance with the 
 person of Peter, it is to spiritual men that this power will belong, 
 either to an apostle, or else to a prophet. For the Church is properly 
 and principally the Spirit Himself, in whom is the Trinity of the One 
 Godhead Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Spirit combines that 
 Church which the Lord has made to consist in three persons. And 
 thus, from that time forward, any number of persons, who may have 
 combined together with this faith, is accounted "a Church" from the 
 author and consecrator of the Church. And, accordingly, the Church, 
 it is true, will forgive sins ; but it will be the Church of the Spirit by 
 means of the spiritual man ; not the Church which consists of a number 
 of bishops. ' * 
 
 It will now be seen that Tertullian's argument about 
 three constituting a Church, in the passage which 
 came first under discussion, is in direct connection 
 with the argument of this last passage. The ' anti- 
 sacerdotal ' tone of it is quite manifest or rather, 
 what is manifest is that it substitutes a priesthood 
 of supposed inspiration for the priesthood of an 
 ordained and official ministry. It sets the Church 
 of the Spirit against the Church of the bishops. 
 
 So far, then, Montanism gives us good evidence 
 as to the temper of the Church when she rejected 
 that movement in the second century. But is it, 
 then, the case that Montanism represented the older 
 mind of the Church an older ' freedom of prophesy- 
 
 1 id. 'Quid nunc et ad ecclesiam, et quidem tuam, psychice? Secundum enim 
 Petri personam spiritalibus potestas ilia conveniet aut apostolo aut prophetae. Nam 
 et ecclesia proprie et principaliter ipse est Spiritus, in quo est trinitas unius divini- 
 tatis, Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus. 111am ecclesiam congregat, quam Dominus 
 in tribus posuit. Atque ita exinde etiam numerus omnis, qui in bane fidem con- 
 spiraverint, ecclesia ab auctore et consecratore censetur. Et ideo ecclesia quidem 
 delicta donabit : sed ecclesia Spiritus per spiritalem hominem, non ecclesia numerus 
 episcoporum.' 
 
 N
 
 194 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 ing ' ? l Not in the least. The Church never in fact 
 committed herself at all to any position with refer- 
 ence to the rights and powers which would be allowed 
 to those whose real inspiration she could recognise. 
 She did not admit Montanist inspiration and then 
 deny that it had accompanying rights ; she simply 
 denied that it was inspiration. She was taking up 
 no new line towards prophecy whatever. And the 
 more closely we look at Montanism, whether in its 
 origin or in its development, the less inclined shall 
 we be to attribute to Montanism conservative or 
 retrospective tendencies. ' It was the element of 
 conservatism in it,' it has been recently said by one 
 whose justice always commends his words, 'the fact 
 that it spoke the language and reaffirmed the idea 
 of a bygone day, that gave Montanism its strength, 
 and won over to it so powerful a champion as 
 Tertullian.' 2 Such language, however, seems con- 
 trary to the evidence we have of the nature of 
 Montanism. If we read Tertullian 's de Virginibus 
 Velandis, we shall be struck with its ^conservative 
 tone. Tertullian, the catholic, strikes the note of 
 conservatism in the Praescriptiones. As a Montanist 
 he still kept his hold on the ancient doctrine ; 
 
 1 We have not, it must be remembered, to deal in Montanism with a claim for 
 ' liberty of prophesying ' in any modern sense, but with a claim of supernatural 
 inspiration. See Dr. Salmon's article in the Diet. Chr. Biog. on MONTANUS, and 
 Authority and Archaeology pp. 292 ff. 
 
 2 Dr. Sanday in Expositor, Feb. 1887, p. no. Bonwetsch, the best recent 
 investigator of the matter, though he does not altogether accept this view of 
 Montanism as a conservative or reactionary movement, quotes some words from the 
 acts of a bishop Achatius in the Decian persecution ( 4 ap. Ruinart Ada Martyr. 
 Sincerd) as a sign that this view of them was held already in early days (Zeitschr. 
 
 f. k. Wissenschaft it. k. Leben, 1884, heft ix. p 473). The words are : ' Cataphryges 
 aspice homines religionis antiquae." But they are completely misunderstood. The 
 words are put in the mouth of the pagan magistrate. He had first induced the 
 Montanists to apostatize and sacrifice, and then held them up as examples of return 
 to the ancient religion, i.e. the old Roman religion: 'ad mea sacra converses,' 
 he continues, 'reliquisse quae fuerant, et nobiscum Diis vota persolvere.'
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 195 
 
 but 'novitas' is his watchword in matters of dis- 
 cipline. In this region he denounces custom : ' custom, 
 which, taking its origin from ignorance or sim- 
 plicity, is strengthened by succession into a practice, 
 and then makes its position good against the truth. 
 . . . It is not the charge of novelty, but the truth, 
 which refutes heresies. Whatever is against the 
 truth, this is heresy, even though it be an old custom.' 
 The rule of faith indeed is immovable, 1 but ' the 
 other matters of discipline and life admit the novelty 
 of correction, because the grace of God works and 
 advances even till the end.' There is a gradual 
 development, then, in the Church as the Spirit ' the 
 Lord's Vicar' gradually works out His plan of 
 discipline. This development has for its content ' the 
 direction of discipline, the revelation of Scriptures, 
 the improvement of our understanding, the advance 
 to a better state of things.' It is like the natural 
 development of physical life. The infancy of man- 
 kind was under the Law and the Prophets ; it came 
 to its hot youth under the Gospel ; now, through the 
 Spirit (i.e. the Spirit which inspired the new prophets, 
 the Montanist Spirit, in virtue of which they set the 
 ' Church of the Spirit ' against the ' Church of the 
 bishops') it is realizing the strength of manhood.' 2 
 
 1 But is more fully unfolded to Montanists : see ad Prax. z. 30 de Res. 
 Cam. 63. 
 
 2 de Virg. Vel. i : ' Hac lege fidei manente, cetera iam disciplinae et conver- 
 sationis admittunt novitatem correctionis, operante scilicet et proficiente usque in 
 finem gratia Dei. . . . Cum propterea Paracletum miserit Dominus, ut quoniam 
 humana mediocritas omnia semel capere non poterat, paulatim dirigeretur et 
 ordinaretur et ad perfectum perduceretur disciplina ab illo vicario Domini Spiritu 
 sancto. . . . Quae est ergo Paracleti administrate, nisi haec, quod disciplina 
 dirigitur, quod scripturae revelantur, quod intellectus reformatur, quod ad meliora 
 proficitur? Nihil sine aetate est, omnia tempus exspectant. . . . Sic et iustitia 
 (nam idem Deus iustitiae et creaturae) primo fuit in rudimentis, natura Deum 
 metuens ; dehinc per legem et prophetas promovit in infantiam ; dehinc per evan- 
 gelium efferbuit in iuventutem : nunc per Paracletum componitur in maturitatem.'
 
 196 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 This passage has no direct bearing on the claim to 
 possess a substitute for ordained bishops in inspired 
 prophets, but it disposes of the contention that 
 Montanism represented conservative tendencies in 
 matters of church discipline. As well, then, might 
 one quote the contemporary humanitarians as illus- 
 trating what had hitherto been the Church's doctrine 
 about Christ, as the Montanists to illustrate her 
 doctrine of orders. 1 
 
 Now we have come to the end of a long argument. 
 Starting from the age of Irenaeus, we have traced 
 downward the stream of church life, and everywhere 
 we have found the Church recognising the authority 
 of a ministry, derived by succession from the Apostles, 
 and consisting of bishops, presbyters, and deacons ; 
 everywhere we have seen reason to believe that these 
 ministers were qualified for their high functions by an 
 ordination given after due election with the laying-on 
 of the hands of the bishops who were before them, 
 and only in virtue of such ordination held to possess 
 the authority and the grace of God requisite for the 
 ministry they were called to fulfil. It was of course 
 only gradually that this ministerial principle gained 
 complete and adequate expression. It was with this 
 as with church doctrine. In both departments there 
 is a development in explicitness of conception and in 
 accuracy and fulness of language. But the principle 
 held the ground from the first with thorough recogni- 
 tion ; and the evidence of this is that, wherever the 
 claim of the ministry was challenged, the spirit of the 
 Church rose to maintain it, and those who could not 
 
 1 These humanitarians really did make the claim to be the true conservatives ; 
 see Euseb. H. . v. 28. The Little Labyrinth makes the suggestive rejoinder : 
 ' What they said might have been perhaps convincing, if, first of all, the Holy 
 Scripture had not contradicted them."
 
 III.] The Witness of Church History. 197 
 
 recognise the authority of their fathers in Christ 
 found themselves aliens from the brotherhood. The 
 challenge may have come from the side of Montanist 
 enthusiasm or Novatian separatism ; or it may have 
 been due to the self-assertion of an individual against 
 church order, as when Colluthus, who was no bishop, 
 attempted to ordain a presbyter ; or it may have had 
 its origin in a collapse of discipline such as led to the 
 attempt of some deacons, in days of persecution, to 
 offer the eucharist ; or it may have been a challenge 
 in theory rather than in practice, like Aerius' denial 
 of the distinctive dignity of the episcopate. But, 
 in whatever sense and from whatever quarter the 
 authority of the ministry was challenged, the mind of 
 the Church spoke out loud in its vindication. For the 
 ministry was acknowledged, instinctively and univer- 
 sally, as the divinely given stewardship of truth and 
 grace, as part of the new creation of God ; and, ' the 
 things which the Lord instituted through His Apostles, 
 these,' in Athanasius' words, ' remain honourable and 
 valid.' As an institution of Christ through His 
 Apostles divine, permanent, and necessary the 
 threefold ministry made its appearance pn the 
 horizon of our epoch and ' the memory of man ran 
 not to the contrary.'
 
 CHAPTER IV 
 
 THE INSTITUTION OF THE APOSTOLATE 
 
 The present HITHERTO we have been occupied in expounding a 
 theargu? certain set of principles which are involved in the 
 phrase ' the apostolic succession of the ministry,' and 
 in adducing a great body of evidence calculated to 
 show how completely, and (as far as appears) with- 
 out exception, these principles obtained acceptance 
 in the Church, and governed her action, from the 
 middle of the second century onwards. It is, in fact, 
 impossible to exaggerate the intimacy with which the 
 episcopal succession is bound up with the fixed canon 
 of Scripture and the permanent and stable creed to 
 constitute what can rightly be called 'historical 
 Christianity.' We may indeed see more clearly, on 
 reviewing the earlier period, that there was the same 
 tentativeness in the process by which the formulated 
 nomenclature and the exact form of the ministry was 
 arrived at, as appears in the corresponding formula- 
 tion of the creed of the Church ; but in neither case 
 did this development in language and form involve 
 any uncertainty of principle in the period already 
 reviewed : and, if we compare the development of 
 the ministry with the process by which the canon 
 of Scripture was fixed, we are struck with the fact 
 that the hesitation, which appears in the latter 
 
 198
 
 CHAP. IV.] The Institution of the Apostolate. 199 
 
 process as to what did and what did not fall within 
 the canon, has no parallel in any hesitation as to 
 what did or what did not constitute at any particular 
 moment the ministry in the Church. On this subject 
 there was no conflict or division of opinion inside 
 the body of the Church which is brought under our 
 notice. The discussion about Montanism was not 
 (as we have seen) a discussion as to the rights of pro- 
 phets, but as to whether certain people were or were 
 not justified in claiming the prophetic inspiration. 
 
 Hitherto, however, we have not touched the period 
 which lies behind the middle of the second century. 
 The reason for this has been that we have such very 
 fragmentary light on the space which intervenes 
 between this date and the point where the Acts of 
 the Apostles comes to an end. ' I have elsewhere,' 
 says Dr. Salmon, 'described the paucity of docu- 
 ments dating from the age immediately succeeding 
 the apostolic, by saying that church history passes 
 through a tunnel. We have good light where we 
 have the books of the New Testament to guide us, 
 and good light again when we come down to the 
 abundant literary remains of the latter part of the 
 second century ; but there is an intervening period, 
 here and there faintly illumined by a few documents 
 giving such scanty and interrupted light as may be 
 afforded by the air-holes of a tunnel. If in our study 
 of the dimly-lighted portion of the history we wish 
 to distinguish what is certain from what is doubtful, 
 we may expect to find the things certain in what 
 can be seen from either of the two well-lighted ends. 
 If the same thing is visible on looking from either 
 end, we can have no doubt of its existence.' 1 
 
 1 Expositor, July 1887, p. 3 f.
 
 2OO Christian Ministry. [CHAP, 
 
 it remains We proceed, then, to examine the beginnings of 
 
 to verify the . . . - 
 
 postulates the ministry in other words, first, to obtain an 
 history, answer to the question whether the postulates of the 
 later Church are verified by the intention of Jesus 
 Christ as recorded in the Gospels : secondly, to inter- 
 rogate the history of the apostolic Church as recorded 
 in the Epistles and in the Acts of the Apostles, and 
 draw out the witness which this record affords on the 
 earliest development of the Christian ministry : lastly \ 
 to scrutinize the documents which shed a certain 
 amount of light on the subapostolic period, and see 
 whether they bear out the theory of the apostolic 
 succession, and whether, further, they supply the 
 links which enable us to form an adequate idea of 
 the method by which the ministry of the apostolic 
 days passed into the ministry of the better known 
 period of church history. 1 
 
 first, in the The first task before us is to investigate the inten- 
 christ-s tion of Christ. It has been already pointed out that 
 the method of Christ was to withdraw from the many 
 upon the few. While He healed widely and freely all 
 who had ' faith to be healed,' He taught those only, 
 except by the way, in whom He discerned the higher 
 sort of faith which would make them disciples. These 
 He trained to become a firm consolidated body, rooted 
 
 1 Speaking of The Churchand the Ministry, a pamphlet in review of his Bampton 
 Lectures, Dr. Hatch says of the author : ' He begins by asserting that he accepts the 
 author's method, and that he wishes only to answer the question which the author 
 proposed, viz. What does the existing evidence teach as to the early history of 
 ecclesiastical organization? but he silently, and perhaps unconsciously, devotes the 
 rest of his review to the consideration of a very different question, viz. How far can 
 the existing evidence be interpreted on the Augustinian theory?' {B.L. pref. to 2nd 
 ed. p. xiii.). My contention is that the evidence at certain periods teaches positively, 
 that is to say, the evidence collected in the last chapter and portions of the evidence 
 now to be produced ; but in the subapostolic period it is often necessary, on account 
 of the deficiency of positive evidence, to be content with finding that what there is is 
 consistent with the positive position, which the earlier and later evidence so strongly 
 suggests as almost to force it upon us.
 
 IV.] The Institution of the Apostolate. 201 
 
 and grounded in faith in Himself, that they might 
 be the nucleus of His universal Church. Even within 
 the body of these disciples there were inner and outer 
 circles : there were the twelve and also * they that 
 were with them,' 1 the women who ministered to them 
 and the seventy who shared at a certain stage the 
 apostolic commission. 2 Confining our attention now The Gospels 
 to the inner circle, with whom Christ chiefly concerned fnSfuftion 6 
 Himself, we ask ourselves : Was His training of the a^toi*"* 1 
 twelve the training merely of typical disciples? or 
 was it, over and above this, the training of ministers, 
 of officers in His kingdom ? This latter seems un- 
 doubtedly the true answer. ' He called unto Him 
 whom He Himself would, . . . and He appointed 
 twelve that they might be with Him, and that He 
 might send them forth to preach and to have authority 
 to cast out devils.' ' He called His disciples and 
 He chose from them twelve, whom also He named 
 
 1 St. Luke xxiv. 33 ; cf. St. Mark iv. 10 : ot irepl O.VTOI> avv rots 
 - The seventy (or seventy-two according to another reading) of St. Luke x. i share 
 the earliest apostolic commission : they are sent forth (St. Luke x. 3 : iiov dnxxfrc'AAw 
 vjtias, cf. ix. 2), with authority over the powers of Satan (x. 17, 19, cf. ix. i), as 
 representatives of the kingdom, endowed with its peace and having power to com- 
 municate it (x. 9, cf. ix. 2, and observe x. 6 : en-avairaucreToi ejr* avrbv -q cipijio; v/xwv* 
 ei fie f"jye, </>' v^as avaxafii^ei), and as representatives of Christ (x. 16 : 6 O.KOVUIV 
 iiftiav efxov oxovct, K.r.X.). The number seventy or seventy-two is supposed to have 
 reference to the seventy-two heads of the Sanhedrin ; or to the seventy-two tribes of 
 mankind (see Godet in loc. and Clem. Recog. ii. 42) ; or, much more naturally, to 
 the seventy elders endued with the spirit of prophecy (Num. xi. 16-30). Thus the 
 later Church saw here the institution of the presbyterate by our Lord ; see CUm. 
 Ep. Petri i and Jerome Ep. Ixxviii. ad Fabiol. mans. 6. (The seventy elders, 
 however, were also regarded as the prototype of the chorepiscopi.) In some tradi- 
 tions these seventy are reckoned apostles. Thus the Syriac Teaching of the Apostles 
 reckons seventy-two apostles as originating ' the ordination to the priesthood,' and 
 a late Arab writer, historian of the Coptic Church, who may draw on an earlier 
 tradition, speaks of the apostles as seventy, besides the twelve ; see refs. p. 119, n. 1 
 This suggests the 'apostles' and 'prophets' of the Didache. It is important that 
 those who accept the historical character of St. Luke's Gospel should recollect that 
 there must have been in the apostolic Church a number of these ' evangelists,' who 
 had received our Lord's commission, and whom we certainly cannot identify with 
 presbyters whose office was local.
 
 202 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 apostles.' l These, as appears from His instructions 
 to them, are to be His authorized representatives in 
 the ministry of mercy and judgment. 2 ' Evidently,' 
 says Mr. Maurice, ' He never separates the thought 
 of training them in their office from that of performing 
 His own. As evidently He is training them to an 
 office ; He is not teaching them to be great saints, 
 to keep up a high tone of personal holiness as if that 
 were the end of their lives.' Thus, he adds, 'if we 
 called the four Gospels " the Institution of a Christian 
 Ministry," we might not go very far wrong or lose 
 sight of many of their essential qualities.' 3 Further, 
 this apostolic ministry which Christ is seen to be 
 training, though at times it seems to constitute almost 
 the whole of that definite body which is being prepared 
 to be the Church, is intended to be what in history 
 it became not the whole Church, but only one 
 element in it. 4 This is implied in a striking manner 
 and there is no doubt that what a teacher implies 
 often produces as striking an effect upon the mind as 
 what he explicitly teaches in the parable in which 
 
 1 St. Mark Hi. 13, 14 ; St. Luke vi. 13. 
 
 2 The personal and official position of the twelve appears clearly in St. Matt, x., 
 St. John vi. 67-70, St. Luke xxii. 29, 30 ; cf. St. Matt. iv. 19. They are called ' the 
 disciples' par excellence (in e.g. St. Mark x. 23-46, St. John xviii. i); so they 
 mediated between Christ and the crowd in the feeding of the five thousand (St. Luke 
 5x. 10-17), and at other times (St. Matt. xv. 32-39, St. John xii. 20-22); while for 
 their position after the resurrection cf. St. Luke xxiv. 9, 33. 
 
 3 Kingdom of Christ ii. p. 118 [3d ed.]. On the view of the apostolate recently 
 proponed by Dr. Hort see App. Note M. p. 382. 
 
 4 Such a passage as St. Matt, xxiii. 8, referred to by Dr. Hatch B. L. p. 121, does 
 not imply that our Lord condemned all grades and distinctions in His Church, any- 
 more than it implies a condemnation of all grades and distinctions in the State, or 
 than St. Luke xiv. 26 implies a condemnation of all human affections, or St. Luke 
 vi. 20, 24 of all wealth, or St. John x. 8 of all the O. T. prophets. In all these pass- 
 ages there is a mode of speech, which Christ often used, and of which we have to 
 take account. He condemns all dignities which interfere with His unique mastership, 
 not such as represent it, whether in Church or State ; all wealth held as a possession 
 or right instead of as a trust, not all wealth absolutely ; all love which interferes with 
 His divine jealousy, not domestic love in its right place ; precursors who came with 
 His claim, not those who came as His heralds.
 
 IV.] The Institution of the Apostolate. 203 
 
 Christ gives St. Peter a picture of the divine house- 
 hold which He is intending to establish. He had been 
 uttering some warnings and encouragements to His 
 disciples, partly in the form of parables, with reference 
 to the spirit of detachment and its reward, and 
 St. Peter questions Him whether He is speaking to 
 them, the twelve, only or to all. Christ answers with 
 another question : ' Who is that faithful and wise 
 steward whom his Lord shall set over his household 
 of servants, to give them their portion of meat 
 in due season? Blessed is that servant whom 
 his Lord, when he cometh, shall find so doing.' * 
 Here is a picture of ' the household ' of the Church 
 which Christ is intending to organize, and it is 
 represented with a permanent distinction, enduring 
 till the Lord come again, the distinction between 
 the ordinary servants and the steward who distributes 
 the ' bread of life.' Thus the impression is left on us 
 that in the Christian household there is to be, by dis- 
 tinction from the ordinary members, a stewardship, 
 instituted by the Master and enduring till the end. 2 
 
 This impression, derived from a general considera- 
 tion of Christ's dealings with His Apostles, is deepened 
 by the study of special commissions given to them. 
 
 1 St. Luke xii. 41-43. The future (coTooTijaei is to be noticed ; it is like the futures 
 oiKoSofi-na-ia, Siatru, in St. Matt. xvi. iS, 19. 
 
 2 M. Godet's comment on this parable is as follows (S. Luc. ii. p. 138) : ' This 
 utterance seems to imply that the apostolate will perpetuate itself till Christ's return ; 
 and in fact it is an irresistible conclusion from the figure employed, that there will 
 remain to the end, in the Church, a ministry of the word established by Christ. 
 The Apostles perceived this so clearly that, when they left the world, they were at 
 pains to establish a ministry of the word to take their place in the Church. This 
 ministry was a continuation of their own, if not in its completeness, at any rate in one 
 of its most indispensable functions that of which Jesus speaks in this parable the 
 distribution of spiritual nourishment to the flock. . . . The theory which makes the 
 pastorate emanate from the Church as its representative is not scriptural. This com- 
 mission is rather an emanation from the apostolate, and therefore mediately an 
 institution of Jesus Himself.'
 
 2O4 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 (i)Thecom- (i) We have the commission promised to St. Peter. 1 
 st. s pete! Christ meets St. Peter's confession of His Messiahship 
 or Divine Sonship with a special benediction. He 
 pronounces him ' Peter,' the man of rock, and declares 
 that on this rock He will build His Church. So far 
 He is dealing with the human character of St. Peter. 
 There is in His language, as it has been admirably 
 explained, 2 a sense of relief, the relief that comes of 
 perceiving in St. Peter's deliberate acceptance of His 
 divine claim a solid basis on which His spiritual 
 fabric may be reared, or at least a basis capable of 
 being solidified by discipline and experience till it 
 become a foundation stone on which the Church may 
 rest. The rock then, of which Christ speaks, is the 
 rock of a human character confessing the divine claim. 
 It is as men, as human characters, that the twelve 
 Apostles are the twelve foundation stones of the 
 New Jerusalem. And, if the promise to St. Peter 
 which follows must be interpreted of an official posi- 
 tion which is to be given to him in the Church, we 
 have here at starting an emphatic intimation that 
 official dignity in the Church is meant to rest on 
 a basis of moral fitness. 3 But does Christ pass in 
 His promise to St. Peter from words which concern 
 his moral character to words which imply his spiritual 
 office? He certainly does. He promises that He 
 will give him ' the keys of the kingdom of heaven,' 
 or of the Church, and this is in other words promising 
 to make him the official steward of the divine house- 
 
 1 St. Matt. xvi. iS, 19. 
 
 2 Holland Creed and Character p. 49. 
 
 3 Christ, however, in choosing Judas whom He ' knew from the first ' among the 
 twelve, showed that He distinguished between moral worth and spiritual authority, 
 and this is also implied in His words about the Jewish authorities (St. Matt, xxiii. 
 2, 3) : ' the scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses" seat : all therefore whatsoever they 
 bid you observe, that observe and do, but do not ye after their works.'
 
 IV.] The Institution of the Apostolate. 205 
 
 hold. When Shebna was substituted for Eliakim in 
 the treasurership or stewardship of the house of David, 
 this was the word of the Lord : x ' I will call my servant 
 Eliakim the son of Hilkiah : and I will clothe him 
 with thy robe, and strengthen him with thy girdle, 
 and I will commit thy government into his hand. 
 . . . And the key of the house of David will I lay 
 upon his shoulder ; so he shall open, and none shall 
 shut ; and he shall shut, and none shall open.' It is 
 promised, then, that St. Peter shall be made the 
 steward of the divine household, 2 and this carries 
 with it an authority to ' bind ' or ' loose,' that is to 
 prohibit or permit in a word, to give legislative 
 decisions with that heavenly sanction and authority 
 which is the proper endowment of the kingdom of 
 heaven. 3 
 
 Two questions may be raised with reference to this as (a) the 
 promise. What, it may be asked first, is St. Peter's twel^stl 
 relation in respect of this official position to the other 
 Apostles ? The answer seems to be that the official 
 position is here not given but promised, and that the 
 commissions actually given after the resurrection, 
 the commissions which are seen in action in the 
 apostolic history, are given to the whole apostolic 
 body, and acted upon by all alike with the same 
 authority though St. Peter is their leader. 4 A question a nd(*)ad- 
 may be raised secondly as to St. Peter's relation to Sffi"e S rrfth 
 the whole Christian community : for on another Church - 
 
 1 Isai. xxii. 20-22, cf. Moberly Great Forty Days pp. 127-130. 
 
 2 Of course subordinately to Christ (Rev. iii. 7). 
 
 3 See Edersheim Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah ii. pp. 81-85. Binding or 
 loosing referred simply to the prohibition or else permission of things or acts. It was 
 one of the powers claimed by the Rabbis. But in relation to persons it implies a 
 judicial, administrative power. , 
 
 4 St. Cyprian's opinion in this sense has been already quoted. It coincides with 
 Origen's in the East (in loc.) and represents in fact the general mind of the early
 
 206 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 occasion, when Jesus Christ was speaking of the 
 duty, under which His disciples might lie from time 
 to time, of bringing one of their brethren under the 
 censure of the Church, He attributes to the local 
 Church as a whole that authority to bind and loose 
 which in its application to individuals is of course a 
 judicial authority to which He again declares the 
 supernatural sanction to attach. 1 The answer to 
 
 Church. So Theophylact (in loc.)'. 'They who have obtained the grace of the 
 episcopate as Peter had (oi KO.TO. Tlerpov r>js eTrMrxoirt/crji dftajfleVres ^apiros) have 
 authority to remit and bind. For though the " I will give thee " was spoken to Peter 
 alone, yet the gift has been given to all the Apostles. When? When He said 
 " whosesoever sins ye remit, they are remitted." For this " I will give" indicates a 
 future time the time, that is, after the resurrection.' Perhaps the strongest evidence 
 of the truth of this view is the absence of any special claim made by, or for, St. Peter 
 in the Acts or Epistles, especially in St. Peter's own first Epistle, where (v. i, 2) his 
 pastoral charge (St. John xxi. 15-17) is identified with that of the elders ; and on the 
 other hand St. Paul's strenuous claim to be, as an apostle, dependent on none but 
 Christ and in no respect inferior to the others; see Gal. i. n, 12, ii. i-io. This of 
 course admits of a primacy being assigned to St. Peter so that oi Trepl Iltrpov can 
 be the name for all of them, as in Ign. ad Smyrn. 3, and the conclusion of St. 
 Mark's Gospel in L (given in Alford, and Westcott and Hort). I deal briefly with 
 this matter because this book is meant to be simply a vindication of the catholic idea 
 of the ministry and not to go into questions which arise within the area where this 
 finds acceptance. Tertullian's view of the meaning of the passage now in question, 
 referred to on p. 193, is essentially the view of a Montanist. 
 
 1 St. Matt, xviii. 15-18. The declaration is still future, it is a promise. Afterwards 
 follows the promise which attaches to the prayer of even two disciples (ver. 19), 
 based on the fact that Christ's presence is with even so small a number as two or 
 three if they are gathered together ' in His Name ' (ver. 20 : that is, in the knowledge 
 of Him and in accordance with His will). This last declaration applies primarily to 
 the promise which attaches to united prayer, for the ' two or three ' refers back to 
 the 'if two of you shall agree to ask.' It may however also refer to the promise of 
 judicial authority, and would mean that this authority is not dependent on numbers, 
 but can be enforced by even two or three in accordance with His will, if they can 
 speak with the voice of the Church so that to disobey them would be to ' refuse to 
 hear the Church ' : cf. among the Pirqe Aboth of Dr. Taylor p. 60 f. ' When ten 
 sit and are occupied in words of Thorah the Shekinah is among them, for it is said, 
 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty. . . . And whence [is it proved of] 
 even three ? Because it is said . . . and hath founded his troop in the earth. And 
 whence even two? Because it is said, Then they that feared the Lord spake often 
 one to another.' Cf. note 15 : ' Every ten men that are assembled in the synagogue, 
 the Shekinah is with them, for it is said, God standeth in the 'edah, etc. And 
 whence even three that judge, because it is said. He judges among gods, etc.,' i.e. 
 the divine presence is amongst even three who constitute a beth din, or house of 
 judgment, to administer justice. So Christ may have meant that His presence is 
 with the smallest 'court of justice' which represents the Church. Cf. Expositor, 
 March 1887, p. 229.
 
 IV.] T/ie Institution of the Apostolate. 207 
 
 this question has already been indicated when the 
 general subject of the relation of the ministry to the 
 Church was under discussion. The supernatural 
 authority does inhere in the Church as a body, but 
 the Church has (not by her own but by Christ's 
 authority) executive officers, and it is through them 
 that her judicial power is put into effect. Christ 
 makes two promises : He promises judicial authority 
 to the Church, and He promises to make St. Peter a 
 steward, an administrative officer in the Church with 
 special reference to this power ; and these two 
 promises are correlative, not contradictory. 
 
 (2) Christ's dealings in the last days of His minis- (2) The com- 
 try are wholly concentrated upon the twelve. With X^hofe 
 them alone He celebrates the Last Supper and insti- body after 
 tutes the memorial of His death, which He commits ifa^** 
 to them to be perpetuated in the Church x ; to them 
 He addresses the last discourses, which are calculated 
 
 1 The Eucharist was certainly regarded from the first in the Church as a sacrifice. 
 ' The conception of the whole action of the Last Supper as a sacrificial action 
 (Opferhandlung) is found clearly in the Didache (c. xiv), in Ignatius, and before all 
 in Justin (Apol. i. 65 f.). But Clement of Rome also expresses it when he (cc. 40-44) 
 draws a parallel between the bishops and deacons and the O. T. priests and Levites, 
 and indicates the Ttpotr&epfiv TO Siapa as their special function ' (Harnack Dogmengesch. 
 \. 152 n. 1 ). See Didache xiv : Kara Ki>puuri]i/ c KvpCav avvaxOevrfS icAcuraTe aprov 
 Kal ewxapioTTJO'aTe TpotrefoftoAoyTjcrei/iei'Oi Ta irapoirrol/xaTa iiyjav, OTTWS Kadapa r) 
 Ovtria. v/iui' ij . . . ovrr/ yap itrnv 17 pT)0ei<7a wirb Kvpiov' 'Ev jrairl TOJTW Kal \pov<a 
 ffpocnjie'peii' ftot Bvaiav xadapdv. Justin Dial. c. Tryph. 41 : Kai 17 rf}s o-e/iiSaAecos 
 poa<Jopa, u> arSpes, i\fyov, rj i'-ep riav KaJSapi^Ofifviav airb TTJS AeVpas 7rpo<r<Jiepecr6ai 
 TrcLpa&oSfl&a, TUITOS f t v TOU aprou TTJS euxapiartaj, &v eis ivafivT^tTiv TOW irafiou?, o5 
 eiraOev virep riav KaSaipOfitviav Tas ^ru\a.<; dirb TraOTjs jropTjpi'os avSpiamav, "IrjiroOs 
 Xpi<rTo 6 KV'PIOS rtit.lv jrape'8tt(ce troitlv : the offering, he explains, is to be made in 
 thanksgiving for the blessings of creation and redemption through Christ's death ; he 
 then quotes the usual passage from Malachi i. n and continues : irept Se riav iv 
 iraiTi Toirw v<f> T\iJiU>v r!av fdviav irpotr^xpofiiviav OVTO> 0vcri<av, roirTfO'ri TOW aprow 117? 
 rw^apioTi'tt? teal TOW iroTTjpt'ou ofioi'w; TJ}S cwxapiffTias, irpoAcyei TOTE tlirlav xal TO 
 bvofiti awrow &odtiv Tffxa; vjitas ie /Se/STjAow. Irenaeus iv. 17. 5 : ' Sed et suis 
 discipulis dans consilium primitias Deo offerre ex suis creaturis . . . eum qui ex 
 creatura panis est, accepit et gratias egit, dicens : Hoc est meum corpus. Et calicem 
 similiter, qui est ex ea creatura quae est secundum nos, suum sanguinem confessusest, 
 et novi testament! novam docuit oblationem quam ecclesia ab apostolis accipiens in 
 universo mundo offert Deo.' 
 
 It would not be in place here to discuss at length the sense in which the early
 
 208 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 to prepare them in character and intelligence for the 
 withdrawal of His visible presence and the substi- 
 tution for it of that new and higher mode of inward 
 presence by His Spirit, which He should give to His 
 Church when He was glorified. In all this Christ is 
 dealing with them no less as apostles 1 than as 
 representative disciples. After His resurrection He 
 does not cease to deal with them in the latter capa- 
 city, but it would appear that the commissions, which 
 in the 'great forty days' were no longer promised 
 
 Church believed the eucharist to be a sacrifice. Briefly however it is in place to 
 remark that 
 
 (1) The whole language of the earliest Church seems most easily interpreted, if 
 we suppose that the bread and wine, chosen out of the general offerings of the con- 
 gregation and presented before God as a memorial of Christ's sacrifice with accom- 
 panying prayers, were regarded as constituting the thank-offering (eucharist) or 
 oblations (gifts) of the Church and as expressive of that relation of sonship and 
 purity and freedom of approach to God, which belonged to the Church in virtue of 
 her redemption, as being the 'high-priestly race.' These 'gifts' were then offered 
 for the consecration of the Holy Spirit. They became 'no longer common bread 
 but eucharist, made up of two substances, an earthly and an heavenly ' : they 
 became to the Church ' the Body and Blood of Christ. ' This response of God to the 
 Church's invocation, this mingling of heavenly and earthly things, gave to the 
 Church's sacrifice a new power and brought it into essential union with the One 
 Sacrifice, with 'Jesus, the mediator of the new covenant," and with 'the blood of 
 sprinkling.' But for this, the Church's sacrifice would have been most Judaic in 
 character. 
 
 (2) The consent of the Church in regarding the eucharist as a sacrifice appears 
 to fix the meaning of Christ's words of institution. In this connection it requires to 
 be observed (a) That Justin Martyr interprets iroiflv as = ' to offer ' (Dial. c. Tryph. 
 41, just quoted, and 70), and this use of the word is common in the LXX without any 
 qualification, e.g. in Exod. xxix. 36-41, Lev. ix. 7-22, it occurs nine times. But it 
 lacks support in the New Testament and generally in Fathers and Liturgies. It 
 enables us, however, in St. Luke xxii. 19, 20, i Cor. xi. 24, 25 to give, as is natural, 
 the same meaning to TOVTO in both corresponding clauses, TOVTO <TTLV . . . TOVTO 
 mxeiTe : and in i Cor. xi. 25 also to make TOVTO the accusative, as the sentence 
 requires, to both verbs, jroieire and nrnjTe. (6) That there is an obvious reference 
 to the words of Moses in Exod. xxiv. 8, ISov TO at/ua r^s 6ta07JKi7s, and that agree- 
 ably with this reference the word ttcxuvvonevov (Matt., Mark, Luke) expresses 
 probably not the shedding of Christ's blood in death, but the sacrificial pouring out 
 of it. See Rendall Theol. of the Hebr. Ckr. (Macmillan, 1884) p. 123 f., and cf. 
 Exod. xxix. 12, Lev. iv. 7, 19, 25, 30, 34, viii. 15, ix. 9, etc., in LXX. (c) That 
 ayajxi/rjo-is in the LXX means a memorial before God ; see Lev. xxiii. 7, Num. x. 
 10, Ps. xxxvii. and Ixix. (titles) ; but, on the other hand, see Wisd. xvi. 6, Heb. x. 3 
 and the references in the liturgies : Me/ui")|U.eVoi ovv Siv Si' TJ/UOS vn-efieivep, K.T.\. 
 (Brightman Liturgies pp. 20, 52). 
 
 1 See St. Luke xxii. 14, 29-30 : St. John xiii. 16, 29, xv. 16, xvii. 18.
 
 IV.] The Institution of the Apostolate. 209 
 
 but given, were addressed to them in their official 
 character and to them alone. It would appear to 
 be undeniable, if it had not been so often denied, 
 that these commissions, taken together, are commis- 
 sions given to an abiding apostolate, destined to be 
 permanent till 'the end of the world.' The ' eleven as in st. 
 disciples ' are expressly mentioned as the subjects of 
 the commission recorded by St. Matthew as given on 
 the 'mountain where Jesus had appointed them,' which 
 invested them with His royal power to go and make 
 disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the 
 threefold Name and teaching them to observe all His 
 precepts, and which was accompanied by the promise 
 of His presence with them ' all the days till the com- st. Mark, 
 pletion of the age.' 1 The parallel account of the 
 commission of Christ given in the verses which at 
 present conclude St. Mark's Gospel describes it as 
 given ' to the eleven.' z In St. Luke's narrative, where 
 in connection with Christ's appearance on the evening 
 of His resurrection mention is made of ' the disciples 
 and those who were with them,' it is noticeable that, 
 though there is a record of encouragement and 
 enlightenment and promise, there is no record of a 
 ministerial commission. 3 There was however such a and St. John, 
 commission, given apparently on this occasion, which 
 is recorded by St. John. 4 It is there described as 
 given to ' the disciples ' ; but this expression at the 
 end of St. John's Gospel commonly refers to the 
 
 1 St. Matt, xxviii. 16 f. It is urged that, as there were 'some who doubted,' so 
 others must have been present beside the Apostles. I should have thought that, 
 as a matter of Greek, oi 6 eSitrraa-av must express a subdivision of ' the eleven,' who 
 are the subject of the whole sentence. See Meyer in lac. At any rate they are the 
 only people mentioned in connection with the commission given. 
 
 z St. Mark xvi. 14-18. 
 
 3 St. Luke xxiv. 33 f. but cf. Acts i. 1-5. 
 
 4 St. John xjc. 19-23. 
 
 o
 
 2io Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 twelve, who are the subjects of His typical training. 1 
 The words of the commission, moreover, and the 
 analogy of that recorded in St. Matthew and St. 
 Mark, seem to make it natural to conclude that, 
 though others may have been present, it was addressed 
 to the Apostles only. 2 ' As My Father hath sent Me,' 
 Christ said, ' even so send I you,' and when He had 
 said this, He breathed on them and said : ' Receive 
 ye holy spirit : 3 whosesoever sins ye remit, they are 
 remitted unto them ; whosesoever sins ye retain, 
 they are retained.' Here the opening words contain 
 a manifest reference to the apostolate, and the sub- 
 
 1 So Dr. Westcott says that by ' the disciples ' (in c. xxi. i) is meant ' in all 
 probability the Apostles, the disciples in the narrower sense, though "the twelve" 
 were not all assembled on this occasion, but at most " seven" only.' This use of the 
 word ' disciples ' may be illustrated by a passage closely parallel to that under dis- 
 cussion. Our Lord's prayer in St. John xvii. is spoken amongst ' the disciples ' (xvi. 29, 
 xviii. i). Yet by this is meant ' the twelve ' (St. Matt. xxvi. 20) : thus He prays 
 for them as those whom the Father ' has given Him' (xvii. 6, 9, n) and whom 'He 
 guarded,' so that 'not one of them perished but the son of perdition' (ver. 12), and 
 whom He 'has sent into the world,' as the Father sent Him into the world (ver. t8). 
 These are clearly the definite body, the twelve ; and the expression ' As thou didst 
 send me, so sent I them' (ver. 18) interprets that in xx. 21. 
 
 2 I am of course aware that I have Dr. Westcott against me (Revel, of the Risen 
 Lord pp. 81-83 and Comm. in loc.), as well as many others. On the other hand I 
 am following M. Godet, one of the best recent commentators on St. John ; and the 
 arguments which seem to me of determining force in the matter are 
 
 (1) The parallel commissions to ' the eleven ' in St. Matt, and St. Mark. 
 
 (2) The obvious reference to the apostolate in the words of St. John xx. 21 ; cf. 
 xvii. 18. (The use of ntfiwu in the former case hardly weakens the force of this.) 
 
 (3) The habitual reference of ' the disciples ' at the end of St. John's Gospel to the 
 Apostles. 
 
 (4) The implication of the Acts (as bearing on all the commissions taken together) ; 
 if the Acts is accepted as historical, undoubtedly the Apostles must have received a 
 commission distinct from the Church as a whole to account for their position. 
 
 On the other hand (a) the presence of ' those with them" does not seem to be, in 
 this case, more than in the case of any later ministerial commissions, an argument 
 against the limitation to the Apostles ; (3) the absence of St. Thomas is no hindrance 
 to the commission having been given to the Apostles, as such. The narratives are 
 fragmentary, and we cannot say but that St. Thomas may have had his loss by 
 absence made good to him. He was present among the eleven to receive the com- 
 mission recorded in the other Gospels. 
 
 3 Ao/Sere iri/ev^to. ayiov. Cf. I Cor. xiv. 12 where irvfu^ara. = xapiVjAaTa, and 
 St. John vii. 39 where TO iri>e{)/na = the Holy Ghost and Trveu/tte^His inspiration 
 (Westcott in loc. The distinction, however between nrev|ua and TO irvevfia is 
 patristic ; see Didymus de Sp. S. 15).
 
 IV.] The Institution of the Apostolate. 211 
 
 sequent act of breathing, with the words accompany- 
 ing, seems to be the actual bestowal in power and 
 spirit of those ' keys of the kingdom ' which Christ 
 had formerly promised to the chief of the Apostles. 
 What is bestowed is a judicial power with a super- 
 natural sanction the power, in pursuance of Christ's 
 redemptive mission, to admit men into the new 
 covenant of absolution and to exclude them from it 
 according to considerations of their moral fitness. 
 
 (3) If the threefold pastoral commission to St. (3) The com- 
 Peter x represents, as seems most probable, simply a restored to 
 personal restoration of St. Peter to the position of 
 trust which his threefold denial might be supposed to 
 have lost him, then we shall only be justified in con- 
 cluding from our Lord's words on that occasion that 
 the pastoral care, to govern and to feed, was supposed 
 to be involved in the apostolic commission. 2 
 
 It may very well be maintained that it would be Conclusion 
 impossible to draw certain conclusions on the matter institution 5 * 
 which has been under discussion from the four ArLfties. 
 Gospels, if they existed as isolated documents with 
 no history of the Church to interpret them ; but from 
 a mere examination of the narratives the conclusions 
 arrived at above appear to be the most probable, and 
 as a fact they are supported by all the evidence of 
 church history from its beginning. It would appear, 
 then, that Christ founded not only a Church but an 
 apostolate in the Church, an apostolate moreover 
 which was intended in some real sense to be per- 
 manent; this apostolic office included all that was 
 necessary to perpetuate that mission on which the 
 Father had sent the Son into the world : it involved 
 the authority to teach in Christ's name, to govern, 
 
 1 St. John xxi. 15-17. 2 St. John xxi. 15, 17 06<rice, 16 jroi'/tau-e.
 
 212 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. IV. 
 
 and to feed, and in this sense was described as a 
 stewardship and pastorate : in order to its function 
 of government, a supernatural sanction was attached 
 to its legislative and judicial authority : and finally 
 the two great sacraments of Baptism and the 
 Eucharist were committed to its administration. 1 
 
 Whether, then, it be true or no to say that the 
 Church began in a ministry, 2 it appears certainly 
 true to say that the Church began with a ministry. 
 Those who had received the commission of the 
 apostolate, and those who had not, awaited side by 
 side the same in discipleship but different in office 
 and function that Pentecostal gift which was to 
 make all alike and for the first time, in the full sense, 
 members of the Church of Christ. 
 
 1 Nothing is said to explain the sense in which baptism and the Eucharist re- 
 spectively were committed to the apostolate. As a matter of fact St. Paul regarded 
 the actual administration of baptism as not specially characteristic of the apostolic 
 office. On the other hand it should be noticed that there is no mention in the 
 Gospels of the institution of that which in the Acts appears as the complement of 
 baptism and as specially administered by the Apostles, the rite of laying-on of 
 hands. 
 
 2 See Gladstone Ch. Princ. pp. 201-2 : ' in the Apostles, then, the Christian 
 Church properly so called potentially lay, at the moment when our Saviour uttered 
 those sacred and momentous words which St. Matthew has conveyed to us ; but it 
 had no other existence ; and if we take that moment of time for our point of view, 
 we see the heavenly gift arrested, as it were, on its passage from God to man, given 
 from Him, but not yet arrived at its destination ; not yet communicated to us ; 
 just as the loaves and the fishes were, after Jesus had given thanks and broken, and 
 had given them to the twelve to distribute, but before they had actually served 
 them to the multitude. . . . And so it was to remain until the day of Pentecost.' 
 Cf. Gleanings iii. p. 262 : ' No doubt (as I for one believe) the Church began with a 
 clergy; nay, began in a clergy.' I should have thought however that before the 
 day of Pentecost there were others besides the apostolic clergy who were, in the 
 same sense as they, themselves members of the Church. ' The number of names 
 together were about an hundred and twenty.'
 
 CHAPTER V 
 
 THE MINISTRY IN THE APOSTOLIC AGE 
 
 THE task now before us is to investigate the witness 
 of the apostolic Epistles and of the Acts of the 
 Apostles as to the origin and nature of the Christian 
 ministry and its development in the first period of 
 the life of the Church. The most convenient method 
 will be first to marshal the evidence and then to draw 
 the conclusions which it seems to warrant. Accord- 
 ingly we begin with the evidence of St. Paul's 
 Epistles. 
 
 I. First of all then, St. Paul gives us in each group i. The evi- 
 of his Epistles l a vivid impression of what he under- St. Paul's 
 stood by the ministry of an apostle. 2 He is one (J5rT 
 
 apostle 
 
 1 The two Epistles to the Thessalonians constitute the earliest group. Then 
 come the two Epistles to the Corinthians, with those to the Romans and the Gala- 
 tians all bound together by close connections in subject and tone. Then follow ' the 
 Epistles of the first captivity ' to the Philippians, the Colossians, the Ephesians, and 
 to Philemon. Last come the Pastoral Epistles. Of these Harnack recognises the 
 first two groups as genuine, and the Epistle to the Philippians (Contemp. Review* 
 August 1886, p. 224). I endeavour above to indicate how natural and harmonious a 
 result is derived from the evidence of all of them, taken as genuine, on the subject 
 of the ministry. [Harnack now admits Colossians and practically Ephesians.] 
 
 2 I.e. in the narrower sense, so that a man could rank with 'the twelve.' We 
 find the term used also in a wider sense in 2 Cor. viiL 23 : Rom. xvi. 7, where 
 Andronicus and Junias, St. Paul's kinsmen, are spoken of as ' of note among the 
 apostles ' : Phil. ii. 25, where Epaphroditus is spoken of as St. Paul's fellow-labourer 
 and ' the apostle ' of the Philippian brethren, vfiCtv Se a7rd<rroAoi> icai AetTovfrybv 
 rip xP* la9 f- ov - 1 the latter case the word probably means no more than the 
 messenger sent by the Philippians to minister to St. Paul's need : see Lightfoot in 
 lac., but cf. Clem, ad Cor. 44 oi oirooToAoi ^fxup. In the former cases however (and 
 
 213
 
 214 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 who, having seen Christ after His resurrection and 
 so become qualified to witness to that fundamental 
 fact, 1 has received by no mediating hands but per- 
 sonally from Christ a definite mission. 2 An authori- 
 tative mission is indeed essential for all evangelistic 
 work, for 'how shall men preach, except they be 
 sent ? ' 3 how, that is, can any one take upon himself 
 so responsible an office? But for an apostle it is 
 essential that this mission should be direct from Him 
 who said : ' As my Father hath sent me, so send I 
 you.' Such a direct mission, actual and unmistak- 
 able, from Christ Himself, St. Paul believed himself 
 to have received and was recognised as having re- 
 ceived by his fellow-apostles, who had been appointed 
 in the more normal way while Christ was still on 
 earth. 4 The function of the apostle was primarily 
 that of proclaiming the Gospel. 5 He had become a 
 ' steward of the mysteries of God ' an administrator, 
 that is, of the divine revelations, which, having been 
 kept in the secret counsels of God through ages and 
 generations, had, now that the fulness of the time 
 
 possibly in the latter) the term apostle is probably used much in the sense in which 
 we find it in the Didache perhaps as equivalent to 'evangelists.' For the idea 
 that it included the seventy, see Salmasius de Episcop. p. 61. Theodoret on 
 Phil. ii. 27 says: airoo'TO\ov Se avrbv KeK\rfKev aiiriav ws TT)V einfJLe\eiav avriiiv 
 e/mreirioTevfieVov. 
 
 1 i Cor. ix. i, xv. 8. 
 
 2 Gal. i. i : OVK car' avOpiairiav ovSe Si" avSpioirov. Timothy's mission on the 
 other hand, though not an-' a.v6p<air<av, was Si' avOpiairov (2 Tim. i. 6). St. Paul 
 cannot have regarded the event recorded in Acts xiii. 1-3 as more than a recognition 
 by the Church of a mission which he had already received from Christ. 
 
 3 Rom. x. 15. 
 
 4 St. Paul was an eicrpw/ua (i Cor. xv. 8) ; but he was recognised by his fellow- 
 apostles. See Gal. ii. 7-9. 
 
 8 i Cor. i. 17 : ' Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the Gospel ' (for the 
 reason of this see vv. 14, 15). i Cor. ix. 14. (Alford's comment here is quite beside 
 the mark. ' Preaching the Gospel ' is the primary function of the apostolate, or of 
 the general ministry, as distinguished from the local ministry, whose primary func- 
 tion was administration. Cf. in Clement Quis Dives 42 how St. John does not 
 himself baptize the young man but hands him over to the local ejn'o-xon-oy.) 
 i Thess. ii. 4-9 ; i Tim. ii. 7.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 215 
 
 was come, been declared through the Incarnate Son. 1 
 This office at once involved absolute subordination 
 and lofty authority. For on the one hand the apostle 
 was ' the slave of Jesus Christ.' As he had no per- 
 sonal, arbitrary lordship over the faith of the disciples, 
 so he could proclaim nothing of his own : it was quite 
 beyond his power to alter or innovate upon ' the 
 tradition' which constituted his message. 2 On theandgover- 
 other hand it involved a plenary authority to teach 
 and to govern : for the message was not one to be 
 cast loose as a disembodied truth among mankind, it 
 was to be the basis on which organized societies were 
 to be built. The apostle accordingly was a founder 
 and ruler of Churches, with divine authority given 
 him for their edification ruling them all alike on the 
 basis of a common tradition of doctrine and practice, 
 and claiming from them the obedience of affectionate 
 children to their spiritual father. 3 And inasmuch as 
 the whole purpose of Christ's coming is to reconcile 
 man to God, so of course the authority of an apostle 
 is that of an empowered ambassador and minister of 
 the reconciliation with God which Christ has won : 
 ' God hath put in us,' says St. Paul, ' the word of 
 
 1 i Cor. iv. i : oucovofio? /iv<rn)p<W Oeou. Cf. Eph. iii. 1-13. 
 
 2 He is personally a SovAos (Rom. i. i), officially a wrrjpenjs (i Cor. iv. i) or 
 fiioxoco; (i Cor. iii. 5, 2 Cor. iii. 6, iv. i). Cf. 2 Cor. i. 24 : ox OTI cvpiruofi> 
 iiiuav TTJS iri'orews, and i Pet. v. 3. Gal. i. 8 : (av rjfiei? TJ 0-yyeA.os ef ovpapov 
 evayyeAtVr/Teu [vulv] jrap' S evriyyeXi.a-diJ.fOa. v/Jiiv, avouBefia <rr<o. Thus again St. 
 Paul distinguishes between his own judgment and the command of Christ (i Cor. 
 vii. 6, 10, 12, 25, 40). The primary requirement of his ministry is faithfulness to 
 Christ (i Cor. iv. 2). On the other hand for the authority of the apostle's teaching 
 see 2 Cor. xiii. 3 : TOV tv e/*ol AoAovvros xpiOToC ; 2 Tim. i. 13 : vtroTvma<riv i%f 
 vyianvovTuiv \6yiav iav Trap' e/xou T)icov(7a. 
 
 3 2 Thess. iii. 14, ii. 15 ; i Cor. iv. 15-21, xi. 16, 34 ; 2 Cor. x. 8, xiii. 10 : ij eouo-ui 
 Tpiwi', f/f eSiaKfv d KV'PIOS is oixoSofiriv. (The word efov<ri'a expresses also the right 
 to be supported which accompanied the apostolate, 2 Thess. iii. 9, i Cor. ix. 5 f.) 
 Cf. 2 Cor. vi. 13, xii. 14, The 'word of God,' which the apostles minister, is 
 declared in i Cor. xiv. 36 to be authoritative over all churches alike ; cf. i Cor. iv. 
 17, xi. 16, xiv. 33.
 
 216 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 reconciliation.' 1 It was 'in him' moreover not 
 merely in word as a message, but in power ; so that 
 he could pass sentence on the sins of individuals, to 
 retain or forgive them, with a sanction which is not 
 only supernatural in the spiritual sphere but miracu- 
 lous also in the physical. An offender whose sins 
 merit condign punishment can be 'delivered to 
 Satan,' that he may be taught by physical penalties 
 ' not to blaspheme.' 2 This plenary authority over 
 individuals, which St. Paul describes himself in 
 his pastoral Epistles as exercising in the case of 
 Hymenaeus and Alexander in his single person, we 
 watch him in his Epistles to the Corinthians exer- 
 cising in conjunction with the Corinthian congrega- 
 tion. He rebukes the Church there for not having 
 'removed out of their midst,' or, according to the 
 later church phrase, ' excommunicated,' an incestuous 
 man. Thus, where they had shown only too great a 
 readiness to forgive, St. Paul proceeds, as controlling 
 their action, to judge or to retain the sin. And, 
 because this judgment of a sin has a miraculous 
 physical sanction attached to it, it is described as 
 ' delivering such an one unto Satan for the destruc- 
 tion of the flesh,' in order that the physical penalty 
 may startle him to repentance, and ' his spirit may be 
 saved in the day of the Lord.' 3 And accordingly in 
 
 * 2 Cor. v. 1 8, 19 t TO. iravTa. eic TOV 9fov TOV . . . SoVros 'n^v TTJV Sicueoviav TIJS 
 KaTaAAayrjs, cos <m Seb? fy . . . tfejiepos fv ^/niv TOV \6yov rijs KaTaAAayrjs. iiTrep 
 Xpiorov ovv irpecr/Seuo/Kev. 
 
 ^ i Tim. i. 20 : irapeSiaKa T<O Sarai^r ; I Cor. v. 5 : irapaSovvai Tta Sarara. Cf. 
 Job ii. 6 TrapaSi'Scoju croc avToV, and Stanley s note in loc. 
 
 3 i Cor. v. 3-5 : KexpiKa TOV TOVTO KaTtpyaaanevov ev Tia ovo^aTi TOV Kvpiov 'I>)trou, 
 <rava.\6fvr<av vfiiav Kal TOV efioC irvevfuaTOf o~vv TJJ 8vva.ij.ti TOV Kvpiov -fifiiav 'lija'ov, 
 K.T.A. St. Paul seems to imply that the Corinthian Church, endowed as it was with 
 the gift of ' government,' could have removed the evil-doer out of their midst by the 
 disciplinary authority belonging to the community ; cf. ver. 13. But probably only 
 the apostle could inflict the physical punishment; see Alford in loc. It has been 
 remarked above how clear cut is the distinction in this passage between ' those 
 within,' whom the Church has a right to 'judge,' and 'those without,' over whom 
 she has no such right (w. 12, 13).
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 217 
 
 the event, when presumably the isolation from the 
 Christian community as well as the accompanying 
 punishment had had its perfect work in the particular 
 case, St. Paul exhorts the congregation to receive 
 back their penitent brother ; and again taking the 
 initiative upon himself, speaks of himself as for- 
 giving ' in the person of Christ ' the sin he had before 
 ' retained.' x 
 
 An apostle can thus bring his authority to bear on His ministry 
 
 i r \T r catholic. 
 
 the details of the life of a single congregation, but, 
 speaking generally, his ministry is of the general or 
 catholic order. He has ' the care of all the Churches.' 
 He represents the general Church rather than the 
 particular Churches. It is in this respect that the 
 apostolate is primarily distinguished from the local 
 ministry, of the origin of which we get no clear infor- 
 mation in St. Paul's Epistles, but which yet appears 
 as a recognised institution in that which is of earliest 
 date. Over against the catholic authority of 
 
 apostle is the local authority of the ' presidents,' who mi 
 ' labour amongst ' the Thessalonian Christians and 
 keep them in mind of their duties. 2 There were 
 similar ' presidents ' as well as ' ministers ' and 
 
 1 2 Cor. ii. 5-11 and 2 Thess. iii. 6, 14, 15. The punishment is spoken of as in- 
 flicted by the community in general (ot TrAei'oi/es) and the forgiveness also is assigned 
 to them (cJ $f TI xapt'<C<e<rde, tayw), but St. Paul apparently has to take the initia- 
 tive. For the expression ex jrpocrwmo Xpicrrov, cf. ft> opdjbum Xpiorov (2 Thess. 
 iii. 6). 
 
 2 i Thess. v. 12 : TOVS KoiritavTas ev vfilv Kai ffpoiorofAeVovs vfiSiv ec <evpa teal 
 vovOeTovvras ifias. They are to he esteemed very highly for their work's sake. For 
 (cojrioV cf. i Tim. v. 17 oi KOTrtwiTes iv \6y<a KOLI 8iSa<rK<xAi'(f, and, generally of 
 labourers for Christ, apostolic or others, both male and female, Rom. xvi. 6, 12, 
 x Cor. xv. 10, xvi. 16. It is to be noticed that St. Paul addresses to the whole 
 Church (i Thess. v. 14 f.) admonitions, the execution of which would fall to the 
 presidents ; see esp. v. 14 i/ovOeretTe TOUS ardxTOUs. Government was a function of 
 the whole community exercised through certain official organs. It should be noticed 
 that the Thessalonian Church ne'eds to be admonished not to 'quench the spirit' or 
 'despise prophecy.' Its tendencies to disorder proceeded from a different cause to 
 those which existed among the Corinthians.
 
 218 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 ' teachers ' amongst the Roman Christians, 1 and cor- 
 responding officers of ' government ' and ' assistance ' 
 amongst the Corinthians. 2 But in the Epistles to 
 Corinth and to Rome these other 'ministries' are 
 among the presented to us from a. new point of view. The 
 dowmemrof Church, as the Spirit-bearing body of Christ, is 
 the church v j ewec j as a richly diversified organism in which the 
 life common to all is yet riot given to all alike or to 
 all for the same function. There is a great variety 
 of ' gifts,' that is of special miraculous or spiritual 
 endowments imparted to different individuals over 
 and above the spiritual life necessary for the Chris- 
 tian profession as such, or as special determinations 
 of it ; 3 so that the Christian Church is presented to 
 us as a great spiritual hierarchy of graduated orders 
 or powers, with apostles, prophets, teachers, rulers, 
 helpers, ministers of mercy and exhortation, workers 
 
 church gifts or officers. The prophet, the teacher, the president, the deacon, are 
 well-known figures, and the ministration of mercy may refer to such a function as 
 that of Phoebe, 'the deaconess' (xvi. i, 2), unless indeed hers is the SIO.KOVIO. (cf. 
 i Cor. xvi. 15) and the deacon is 6 nfraSiSovs. But it still remains difficult to assign 
 a distinct office to 6 TrapcucoAcJi' and 6 e\ewi>. It has to be noticed that the Roman 
 Christians had not yet been organized by any apostolic person into one Church ; 
 cf. xvi. 5, 10, n, 15. 
 
 2 At Corinth the ' distinctions of gifts ' (StaipeVeis x a P l<r M <1 ' T < 1 >'')t each with its 
 accompanying ministry (Siaitoi'ia) and power (epe'pyijfia), are the word of wisdom, the 
 word of knowledge, faith, gifts of healings, workings of miracles, prophecy, discern- 
 ings of spirits, kinds of tongues, interpretation of tongues (i Cor. xii. 4-11). These 
 are strikingly different from those mentioned among the Roman Christians. They 
 are much more miraculous and abnormal. The corresponding list of officers in the 
 Church is (w. 28-30) : apostles, prophets, teachers, powers (i.e. workers of miracles), 
 gifts of healings, helps (ai/TiA^n^eis, which may well correspond to the deacon's 
 office), governments (/cu/Sepi^creis, which probably represents the 'presidents' of the 
 Church), kinds of tongues. 'Are all,' St. Paul adds, 'apostles? are all prophets? 
 are all teachers? are all powers? have all gifts of healing? do all speak with 
 tongues? do all interpret?' He is here clearly intent on asserting the principle of 
 unity in variety, not on enabling us to distinguish the variations. 
 
 3 The word x<>pt<rjua is used for an ordinary ' favour ' or ' gift ' of God, as in 2 Cor. 
 i. ii. But it gets a technical sense in which it is distinguished from the fundamental 
 spiritual qualifications of faith and love (i Cor. xii. 4 and 31, cf. xii. i, xiv. i).
 
 v.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 219 
 
 of miracles, speakers with tongues, interpreters each 
 class being not self-constituted but instituted and 
 empowered of God. 1 
 
 A hint in the Epistle to the Romans would 
 indicate what is of course amply corroborated in 
 the Acts of the Apostles and Pastoral Epistles that 
 these spiritual gifts, though they are specially de- 
 scribed as the gifts of God's Spirit, were mediated 
 through the apostolic agency. 2 Otherwise, though it 
 is implied that the gifts were actual, recognisable 
 endowments in all cases and were subject to the 
 apostolic order in their exercise, we have no informa- 
 tion as to how they were communicated, or, when 
 they were non-miraculous, like the gift of ' govern- 
 ment,' how they were recognised. Some, however, 
 of the gifts which caused the Corinthian Church to 
 present such an appearance of wealth in spiritual 
 endowment, were not destined to take a very impor- 
 tant or permanent place in the equipment of the 
 Church. The gift of tongues is heard of but for a 
 little while, and the gifts of healing and miracles 
 do not appear again, any more than some of the 
 functions mentioned in the Epistle to the Romans as 
 constituting distinct offices in the Church. In the there emerge 
 Epistles of the next group the more permanent minence 
 ministries of the Church are seen to emerge into 
 clearer prominence. Christ, says St. Paul to the 
 
 1 The household of Stephanas is described in i Cor. xvi. 15 as having set them- 
 selves to minister to the saints : els jtaxoctW rots a-yi'oi? fTaav eavrovs. In conse- 
 quence the Corinthians are exhorted to be subject to them, as to all workers for 
 Christ. The reference is here probably to a ministry of mercy in general. These 
 persons set themselves to supply the Church's needs, like good Christians in later 
 days. There is probably no reference to any special office, and their authority is 
 such as has been allotted to ' patrons ' of the Church in later days ; cf._ irpoordns, 
 used of Phoebe (Rom. xvi. 2). 
 
 - Rom. i. 1 1 : fTruro6<a l&flv vfias ii/a TI" |xTa3u> ^apicr/ia itfj.lv TrreufiaTKcbi' els TO 
 <m)j>tx9Vji>ai. vfia;, coupled with i Cor. xii. 4; cf. Acts viii. 14 f.
 
 220 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Ephesians, after His ascension, ' gave some to be 
 apostles, and some prophets, and some evangelists, 
 and some pastors and teachers.' 1 Here, with St. 
 Chrysostom, we may recognise the apostles and 
 prophets (who are elsewhere in this epistle classed 
 together as the recipients of the divine secrets now 
 revealed and as the foundation-stones of the Church 2 ) 
 as constituting with the less clearly-defined evan- 
 gelists, the general or catholic ministry of the Church ; 
 while the pastors and teachers, as local officers, 3 are 
 local easily identified with the 'bishops' whom we hear 
 
 anddeacons of, coupled with ' deacons,' in the inscription of the 
 Epistle to the Philippians. 4 There was, we should 
 
 1 Kph. iv. n. The ' pastors and teachers,' under one TOVS Se, represent the same 
 officers. The different orders are, as has been remarked, first gifted (ver. 7), and 
 then themselves God's gifts to the Church (ver. n). 
 
 2 Eph. iii. 5, ii. 20. These prophets are, no doubt, the prophets of the new 
 covenant. This seems to be generally admitted as to Eph. iv. n and iii. 5. But 
 Chrysostom and others among the ancients, with Estius, etc., among moderns, 
 explain Eph. ii. 20 of the O. T. prophets. But it seems manifestly wrong to separate 
 this passage from the other two. The intimations we get of the position of prophets 
 in the earliest Church are somewhat perplexing. On the one hand they are assigned, 
 in the Epistle to the Ephesians, as in Acts xiii. i, 2 and in the Didache, a position of 
 very great importance in the Church as a whole, closely allied to that of apostles. 
 On the other hand, in the Epistle to the Corinthians, though prophets are ranked 
 next to apostles, the gift of prophecy is regarded as a gift belonging to the local 
 Church and exercised in it (i Cor. xiv. 29-33, 39) > c f- also Acts xix. 6. It would 
 appear that at least certain persons with the gift of prophecy occupied a prominent 
 place as prophets and were ranked in that capacity close to apostles as founders of 
 the Churches. See esp. Eph. iii. 5, ii. 20, and Acts xiii. i, 2, where Paul and 
 Barnabas are ranked as ' prophets and teachers,' who are afterwards called ' apostles ' 
 (xiv. 4). All who were given an occasional power of prophecy were not ' prophets,' 
 e.g. those in Acts xix. 6. Cf. App. Note I. 
 
 3 Chrysostom says on Eph. iv. n : TroijueWs (cal SiSao-xaAovs TOVS oAoKAijpoi' 
 e/UTreTncTTeu/iieVovs efli/os' TI o5v ; oi Troi/xe'fe? Kal 01 SiSdcncaAot tAarTOV? ; al waw 
 rwv rrepuoi'Twi' Kal euayye AifojieVwi/ oi Ka.6rjii.fvoi. Kal Trepl eW -rcmov 7J<rx^ 1 l/ ae> ' 01 ' 
 He goes on however to cite Timothy and Titus as instances of the latter class. 
 
 Chrysostom here clearly does not (like Ambrose and Theophylact) identify 
 evangelists with deacons. It is true that Philip, one of the seven (who, in Acts viii., 
 clearly has not the apostolic function), is in Acts xxi. 8 called ' the evangelist ' ; but 
 this was not in virtue of his ' diaconate,' but of his conversion of Samaria. There is 
 also no reason why he should have remained in the lower office. The work of 
 Timothy is' described as that of an ' evangelist," and such a relation to the apostolate 
 suits better the rank assigned here to the evangelists. 
 
 4 Phil. i. i : <rvv ejricricojrois Kal SiaxoVoif. These are different officers.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 221 
 
 gather, a college or group of ' presidents ' or ' bishops ' 
 in each community who discharged the office of 
 government, and acted subordinately to the apostles 
 and prophets, as pastors and teachers of the flock. 
 To these was also attached the ' assistant ' ministry 
 of the ' deacons.' This is borne out in the Pastoral 
 Epistles, where we learn further that these local 
 ' presidents ' or ' bishops ' were also known as ' pres- 
 byters.' x 
 
 The Pastoral Epistles are the locus classicus in The import- 
 the New Testament on the subject of the Christian p^torai' e 
 ministry. Elsewhere St. Paul writes to Churches or plst 
 to a private Christian like Philemon, but here he 
 writes to his own representatives, evangelists and 
 ministers of Christ like himself, on the duties of their 
 office. And these Epistles themselves supply the 
 answer to the question what may have prompted the 
 change of method. It was because the circumstances 
 of St. Paul's last days led him to emphasize the 
 necessity for government in the Church. In the 
 department of doctrine he saw an unpractical profane 
 spirit of speculation springing up, on a Jewish basis, 
 but already displaying that sort of false spiritualism, 
 that horror of what is material and actual, which has 
 constantly characterized oriental thought, and which 
 found such a conspicuous development, in a direction 
 
 1 Titus i. 5-7. More is said below on the identity of the 'bishop ' and 'presbyter.' 
 The irpoiVrrojiei'os among the Thessalonian and Roman Christians = the officer of 
 'government' among the Corinthians = the 'bishop' among the Philippians = the 
 ' pastor and teacher ' among the Ephesians= the ' presbyter ' of the Pastoral Epistles. 
 This is at least what St. Paul's Epistles suggest taken as a whole. The vague use of 
 terms at first need not surprise. See Winterstein Der Episcopat (Leipzig, 1886) 
 p. ii. The apostolate is called a Siaxovia by St. Paul in i Cor. iii. 5 ; cf. i Tim. iv. 
 6, 2 Tim. iv. 5, and Acts i. 25 ; also (with reference to the Psalm) an eirto-Komj in 
 Acts i. 23. The term presbyterate covers the episcopate long after this latter term 
 had gained its later distinct sense. Again, Pothinus is spoken of in the Epistle of 
 the Churches of South Gaul as ' having been entrusted with the Siaxovia of the 
 ejrtoTcoJnj ' (Euseb. H. E. v. i).
 
 222 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 most opposed to Judaism, in the Gnostic movements 
 of the second century. 1 This speculative tendency 
 was frequently joined to a self-seeking proselytism 
 and a thinly-veiled covetousness ; 2 and it allied itself 
 with a terrible tendency to lawlessness, which clouded 
 the whole moral atmosphere of the Christian Church, 
 whether in the department of civil authority and 
 secular occupations, or in the relations of master and 
 servant, or in the inner sphere of church life. 3 
 There was a special need of government, then, in 
 the circumstances of his last years, and this not 
 only in face of the moment but even more in view 
 of the future. In the earlier period of his life St. 
 Paul seems to have expected the second coming of 
 Christ during his own lifetime. 4 In these Epistles, 
 on the other hand, he certainly contemplates his 
 own death and, as in his speech to the Ephesian 
 elders, views with apprehension the characteristics of 
 lawlessness and disobedience, which he foresees will 
 mark ' the last days ' after he is gone, both in the 
 department of doctrine and of life. 5 Both in view of 
 present and of future needs, then, there is a profound 
 need to stir up that gift of government which God 
 has given to the Church. St. Paul in these Epistles 
 is emphasizing no new thing. Just as in the Epistle 
 to the Colossians he develops a doctrine of the person 
 of Christ which had been implied in the expressions 
 of his earlier Epistles, and in the Epistle to the 
 
 1 i Tim. i. 4-7 ; iv. 1-5; vi. 20, 21 ; 2 Tim. ii. 16-18 ; Titus i. 10-16, iii. 8, 9. The 
 intellectual and moral phenomena in Ephesus and Crete are closely parallel. St. 
 Paul's insistence on the duty of praying for secular rulers and all men (i Tim. ii. 1-5, 
 obs. emphasis on iravres, and iv. 10) seems aimed at a tendency which was antici- 
 pating the later Gnostic exclusiveness and depreciation of nature. 
 
 2 Tit. i. 10, ii ; 2 Tim. iii. 6, 7 ; i Tim. vi. 4, 5. 
 
 3 i Tim. vi. i, 2 ; Tit. ii. 9, iii. 1-3 ; 2 Tim. iii. 1-8. 
 
 4 See i Thess. iv. 15 ; i Cor. xv. 51, 52. 
 
 % 2 Tim. iv. 6-8, cf. iii. 1-6, iv. 1-5 ; i Tim. iv. 1-5 ; cf. Acts xx. 17-35.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 223 
 
 Ephesians works out the doctrine of the Church 
 which had been more briefly suggested in his 
 Epistles to the Corinthians, so now he emphasizes 
 that idea of governmental and doctrinal authority 
 in the Church which had been an element in 
 his earlier teaching, especially in his Epistles 
 to the Thessalonians and Corinthians, and conse- 
 quently lets that gift of government, which in the 
 Corinthian Church had been associated with other 
 more exciting but less permanent and necessary 
 endowments, emerge into greater isolation and dis- 
 tinctness. 
 
 We may class under three heads the lessons as Their 
 to the ministry which are to be derived from these wltness 
 Epistles to Timothy and Titus. 
 
 First, as to the local ministries of bishop and (i)Onpresb 
 deacon, if we do not gain much new information, tei 
 on the other hand we have a greater clearness and 
 definiteness given to the picture we can form of their 
 office. Thus the ' episcopus ' is also called ' pres- 
 byter ' ; and, though the latter title would naturally 
 suggest a dignity associated with the reverence due 
 to age x and indicate rather a position than (like the 
 first title) a definite office, yet this will not bear 
 being pressed. A word is used for old men distinct 
 from the title of presbyter, 2 and the latter is 
 
 1 Thus, though indicating a definite office with an assigned KAijpo? (i Peter v. 3 
 and Huther in loc.), the title presbyter still retained its natural meaning and could 
 be put into antithesis to 'young men'(' Peter v. 5, Clem, ad Cor. i. 3), on which 
 more will be said. Later we have presbyter used, not only in its technical sense, but 
 as a title of veneration for the Fathers of the Church by Papias ap. Euseb. H. . iii. 
 39, and Irenaeus ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 20 : ' the elders before us and those associated 
 with the Apostles. ' Cf. St. John's acceptance of the title for himself in 2 John i and 
 3 John i. Thus the title presbyter, like that of deacon, retained a broader, side by 
 side with a stricter, use. There rs not I think sufficient reason to attach the idea of 
 a definite office to the term ' young men ' in Acts. v. 6. 
 
 2 jrpe<r/3vr>7S, Tit. ii. 2.
 
 224 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 markedly identified in the Epistle to Titus with 
 the title of bishop. 1 
 
 These ' bishops ' constituted a college or group of 
 'presidents' in each Church, 2 and are spoken of as 
 being really entrusted with the care of the Church. 3 
 They share the apostolic stewardship, and that not 
 only in the sense of administration, but also in the 
 sense of being entrusted really, though subordinately, 
 with the function of teaching. 4 The proper discharge 
 of their office is secured by their being carefully 
 chosen, after due probation, in view not only of their 
 moral fitness, but also of their capacities as rulers 
 ami deacons; and teachers. 5 The lower ministry of the deacons is 
 provided for in the older and more developed Church 
 of Ephesus, not in the newer Churches of Crete, and 
 it too is to be entrusted only after a due scrutiny of 
 the moral fitness of the man who is to hold it. 6 We 
 gain no light upon the functions of the diaconate, 
 except so far as that the deacons would not be 
 
 1 Tit. i. 5-7. This is quite unmistakable. There is nothing more in the singular 
 en-iWon-os (Tit. i. 7, i Tim. iii. 2) than in the singular irpeo-/3vTepos (i Tim. iv. i). 
 
 2 i Tim. iv. 14 TO 7rpe<rj3uTe'pioi> ; cf. Tit. i. 5. Baur at first maintained that Kara. 
 TrdAiv irpecr/SvTe'pous meant one presbyter in each city, but he abandoned the con- 
 tention. See Holtzmann Pastoralbriefe pp. 208, 209. 
 
 3 i Tim. v. 17 oc TrpoeorioTes Trpeo-jSvTepot ; iii. 5 eicKAijen'as fleov cjri/u.eAi}o-eT<u. 
 
 * Tit. i. 7 fleov oiKovojiov, cf. ver. 9 irapaKaAeiv ev Tjf 8i8acrK<iAia <cai TOVS dimAe'- 
 yoi'Tas eAe'-yxeiv : cf. I Tim. iii. 2 SiSaxriKos, V. 17 juaAiora 01 KOiriupref ei/ Aoyu KOI 
 SiSaa-xaXCa (this need hardly imply that there were any presbyters who did not teach 
 at all), 2 Tim. ii. 2 iKavoi. ere'povs StSafai. 6 (carj)x<">j> in Gal. vi. 6 seems in the 
 context to be a local officer. 
 
 5 i Tim. iii. 1-7 ; Tit. i. 6-9. ftr) veo<t>vrov is omitted in reference to the newly- 
 established Church of Crete, and TKJ/<X e^eiv mora takes its place, see Kiihl 
 Gemeindeordnung in den Pastorattriefen (Berlin, 1885) pp. 13-15. 
 
 8 i Tim. iii. 8-13. The fact that the requirements for the diaconate are nearly the 
 same as those for the presbyterate is to be accounted for by the consideration that 
 the requirements are negative. St. Paul requires much of the Christian, as such. 
 His requirements of the ministry are mainly such as are involved in the absence of 
 any positive reproach in what we should call ' a good character.' There are distinct 
 offices in the Church, not different standards of living for clergy and laity.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 225 
 
 required, by contrast with the presbyters, to teach 
 or to rule. 1 
 
 Secondly, we gain important information as to the p te " ; ^ e 
 extension of the apostolic office. In Timothy and apostolic 
 
 office to 
 
 Titus we are presented with apostolic delegates, 2 legates, 
 exercising the apostolic supervision over the Church 
 of Ephesus and the Churches of Crete respectively. 3 
 They are not indeed what St. Paul and the other 
 Apostles were, the original proclaimers of a revela- 
 tion ; they stand in this respect in the second rank, 
 as entrusted only with the task of maintaining a 
 tradition, of upholding a pattern of sound words. 4 
 But in this task they exercise the supreme apostolic 
 authority, and not in this respect only. To them 
 belongs the function, in Titus' case of founding, in 
 both cases of governing, the Churches committed to 
 them. 5 They ordain men to the church orders, after 
 being duly satisfied of their fitness, and exercise 
 discipline even over the presbyters. 6 Again, as it is 
 their function to maintain the truth, so in defence of 
 
 1 On the inferiority of the diaconate, see Kuhl Gemeindeordnung pp. 15, 16. 
 
 2 Simcox Early Ch. Hist. p. 140 calls them ' vicars apostolic.' Lightfoot Ignatius 
 ' P- 377 speaks of their exercising a ' moveable episcopate.' In Clement of Rome 
 \\. p. 433 he calls them 'itinerant bishops.' Winterstein, Der Episcopat p. 18, calls 
 them ' apostolische Delegaten.' Cf. Rom. xvi. 21 6 avvepyos pav. 
 
 3 How many more of such 'viri apostolici' there may have been we cannot tell. 
 The Siaxovia. of Archippus at Colossae (Col. iv. 17) may have been like that of 
 Timothy at Ephesus. And there may be truth in such a tradition as that mentioned 
 by Dionysius of Corinth (see above, p. 133) as to the position of the Areopagite in 
 the Church of Athens, or that mentioned by Origen as to the position of Gaius at 
 Thessalonica. 
 
 4 2 Tim. i. 13 ; cf. i Tim. i. 3, iv. n, 13, vi. 3 : jrapo/yeAAetv, SiScuncetp, avayvwcrt?, 
 TrapaxAi)<ri?. 2 Tim. iv. 2 ?A.eyoi>, etrirtpiproi' ; Tit. i. 13 Aeyx l " airoro/uus, ii. 
 15 eXe'yx* 1 " nera. iracnjs eiriToyjjs. The rapa#rj<c>) intrusted to Timothy is the truth 
 he is to teach and hand on to others (i Tim. vi. 20, 2 Tim. i. 14). 
 
 5 As e.g. in matters of worship and female behaviour (i Tim. ii. i, 2, 8, 9, n). 
 
 6 Tit. J. 5, i Tim. v. 22. (It seems to me probable that St. Paul is in this latter 
 place speaking of the laying-on of hands in ordination, not in the reception of 
 a penitent. See, however, Paciari of Barcelona Par. ad Poen, 15, Ellicott in loc., 
 and Hort Ecclesia p. 214) i Tim. v. 19-21 ; these judicial powers apparently rest on 
 Timothy's own judgment without appeal. 
 
 P
 
 226 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 it they are to oppose false teachers, and when these 
 exhibit the temper of separatists and heretics and 
 will not 'hear the Church,' they are to act in the 
 spirit of Christ's directions and leave them to their 
 wilful courses, having nothing further to say to them. 1 
 We do not, however, gather that they possessed the 
 miraculous power to inflict physical penalties, which 
 St. Paul describes in his phrase 'delivering unto 
 who act Satan for the destruction of the flesh.' As apostolic 
 
 as later 
 
 bishops, legates, then, Timothy and Titus exercise what is 
 essentially the later episcopal office, but it would not 
 appear that their authority, though essentially per- 
 
 but are not manent, was localized like that of the later diocesan 
 bishop. 2 Timothy indeed had been left at Ephesus 
 by St. Paul to represent himself in view of that 
 Church's needs, and St. Paul certainly contemplates 
 his continuing his ministry after his own death, 3 and 
 presumably in the same Church of Ephesus, in which 
 again it would appear that he had been solemnly 
 ordained to his office. 4 Nor perhaps can we argue 
 
 1 Tit. iii. 10-11. This 'rejection' of a heretic seems to express the idea of St. 
 Matt, xviii. 17. He is to be as one avoided as ' the gentile or the publican.' He 
 is among ' those without.' See for an interesting comment on the passage Origen 
 c. Cels. v. 63, where he describes the true method of dealing with opponents of the 
 faith. 
 
 2 Dr. Lightfoot calls the usual conception of Timothy by church writers as ' bishop 
 of Ephesus ' the ' conception of a later age ' (Dissert, p. 199), but he also describes it 
 as not altogether without foundation. ' With less permanence but perhaps greater 
 authority, the position occupied by these apostolic delegates nevertheless fairly 
 represents the function of the bishop early in the second century.' Perhaps then 
 the only question in dispute between Dr. Lightfoot and one who, like Prof. Shirley 
 (Apostolic Age p. 116), represents the office of Timothy and Titus as 'episcopal in 
 the full range of its power' is as to the exact localization of the office. It can hardly 
 be denied that Timothy and Titus possessed a permanent authority as apostolic 
 delegates, with a permanent \a.p>.fr\i.a. in this sense a 'delegatio perpetua.' The 
 only question is whether it was limited to one place, or still, like the apostolic office 
 which it represented, general. 
 
 8 2 Tim. iv. 1-8. 
 
 * The presbytery of i Tim. iv. 14 is presumably the presbytery of Ephesus, but 
 see Hort Ecclesia p. 184. On the other hand 'the good confession' (i Tim. vi. 12) 
 apparently refers to Timothy's baptismal profession. Note esp. the e/cXTJflrjs, and 
 cf. Kuril i.e. p. 29.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 227 
 
 against his localization from the fact of St Paul 
 summoning him to Rome, or from the fact of his 
 having gone there. 1 But there is a close analogy 
 between the office of Timothy and that of Titus, and 
 Titus certainly appears to have left Crete to join 
 St. Paul, to have been his companion at Rome, and 
 to have left again not for Crete but for Dalmatia. 2 
 Again we do not gather from these Epistles any clear 
 intimation that Timothy and Titus, though they were 
 to provide for a succession of sound teachers, 3 were 
 to ordain men to succeed them in their apostolic office 
 in the local Churches. All that we can fairly con- 
 clude is that St. Paul after ordaining, or with a view 
 to ordaining, the local ministers, bishops and deacons, 
 appointed delegates to exercise the apostolic office 
 of supervision in his place, both before and after his 
 death : and it must be added that the needs which 
 required this extension of the apostolic ministry were 
 not transitory ones. They were the needs of ' the 
 last times ' the constant phenomena of moral failure 
 and doctrinal and moral instability and disorder. It 
 should be added that no definite title is assigned to 
 Timothy and Titus, though their function is spoken 
 of as a ' ministry ' and as ' the work of an evangelist,' 4 
 and Timothy at least is distinguished from the pres- 
 byters as a comparatively young man. 5 No doubt 
 the necessity for fixed titles grew greater with lapse 
 of time and increase of controversy. 
 
 1 2 Tim. iv. 9, Hebr. xiii. 23. 
 
 2 Titus iii. 12, 2 Tim. iv. 10. 
 
 3 2 Tim. ii. 2. 
 
 4 i Tim. iv. 6, 2 Tim. iv. 5. It should be noticed that St. Paul calls his own 
 ministry also a SLOJCOVM (i Tim. i. 12) and speaks of himself as a tao-KaAo? iOviov, 
 as well as KTJpuf icai aJrd<rroAo (ii. 7, 2 Tim. i. u). It is most likely, I think, that 
 Timothy and Titus would have been known as evangelists. 
 
 5 i Tim. iv. 12 ; cf. pp. 223 n. 1 , 277 n. 2 .
 
 228 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 (Hi) on the Thirdly, the Pastoral Epistles give us a clear view 
 
 idea of ordi- 
 nation, of St. Paul's conception of the ministerial office. 
 
 Beyond what constitutes the gift of the Christian 
 life, the apostolic ' minister' 1 is spoken of as qualified 
 for his work by a special ministerial gift or ' charisma ' 
 ' a spirit of power and love and discipline ' im- 
 parted to him (after his fitness has been indicated by 
 prophetic intimations) in a definite and formal manner, 
 ' by means of the laying-on of the hands of the 
 apostle,' or ' with the accompaniment of the laying-on 
 of the hands of the presbytery.' z 
 
 In this process there was one feature which was 
 not destined to be permanent. The prophetic indi- 
 cation of the person to be ordained gradually ceased. 
 The ' bishops ' of the later Church owed their appoint- 
 ment not to prophecy but to some other means of 
 election. And indeed, even in the earliest days, the 
 prophetic voice was only one means of selection to 
 office. But it is only a very arbitrary criticism which 
 can fail to see here, with one slight miraculous 
 and transitory modification, the permanent process of 
 
 1 I assume that what St. Paul says of Timothy he could have said of Titus also 
 no great assumption, as their offices are so wholly similar. 
 
 2 2 Tim. i. 6, 7 : avajuijui'ijo'/cw ere ava^iawvptiv TO xpto>ia TOU Oeov, o ianv eV 
 croi Sea TTJ? eiridto'eios rav \eipiav JU.QU' ov yap eStaxev r\fiiv o 0ebs nreO/Aa cSeiAi'as, 
 aAAa Svvd/uea>s Kai ayamjs icat <r<a<}>povi<rfLov. (The iiji.lv here refers surely to St. 
 Paul and Timothy classified together in the ministry.) i Tim. iv. 14 : /it) a/ne'Aei TOW 
 tv croc xa.ftitrna.TOf eSdflrj troi Sia irpo^jjTei'as /oiera eVifle'crecos TUIV \eipi>v TOV 
 Trpeo-jSurepiou. I Tim. i. 18 : Kara ras Trpoayoucros errl ere 7rp<x^r)Tei'os. With this last 
 expression compare Acts xiii. 2 and Clement of Alexandria Qttis Dives 42, where 
 he describes St. John as icA>jp<f> tva. ye TWO. KArjpcocrwi' TIOV virb TOW Trveu/uiaros 
 cnjjuaii'OjuiiVwr. And the 810 5rpo</>r)Tei'os of the second passage seems to refer to 
 these same prophetic indications, to which equally with the laying-on of apostolic 
 hands Timothy owed his office. The use of Sia as applied to the apostle, while 
 Hera is applied to the presbytery, would naturally indicate the secondary and 
 unessential position of the latter in the act of ordination. But I doubt whether when 
 the prepositions are used in different epistles it is fair to lay as much stress on the 
 contrast as is sometimes done. Besides ' the presbytery ' who lay on hands may 
 include the Apostle himself (cf. i Peter v. i, where the Apostle calls himself a 
 presbyter among presbyters) : i.e. the local officers, with the apostle amongst them, 
 may still be described as ' the presbytery.'
 
 v.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 229 
 
 ordination with which we are familiar in later church 
 history, and that conception of the bestowal in ordi- 
 nation of a special ' charisma,' which at once carries 
 with it the idea of 'permanent character,' 1 and that 
 distinction of clergy and laity which is involved in the 
 possession of a definite spiritual grace and power by 
 those who have been ordained. It is also arbitrary 
 to deny that St. Paul, when he appointed Timothy 
 and Titus to ordain presbyters and deacons, as we 
 gather, by the same process of laying-on hands, 2 
 would have hesitated to attach the same ideas to the 
 subsequent ordinations made by them. 
 
 The final conclusions which are to be drawn from 
 
 1 The ' charisma ' is described as a permanent endowment which having been once 
 received requires only to be ' stirred up,' like baptismal grace. The idea expressed 
 by xdpio>ui in the Pastoral Epistles is exactly the same as that expressed by in/evjio 
 (not TO irvev/na) in St. John xx. 22. Cf. i Cor. xiv. 12, where irvevftaTa^irvni/iaTHtd 
 
 Since Baur {Die sogenannten Pastoralbriefe des Aposteh Paulus, 1835) denied 
 the Pauline authorship of these Epistles and emphasized as a ground for this 
 rejection their hierarchical character, a prolonged controversy has been carried on 
 in Germany the one party emphasizing everything hierarchical and sacerdotal in 
 these documents, and denying their Pauline authorship on that account ; the other 
 party minimizing these characteristics, and then vindicating their Pauline author- 
 ship. Thus on their premises the party of denial (of whom Holtzmann is the ablest 
 recent representative) has a motive to exaggerate the sacerdotalism of the Pastoral 
 Epistles and the party of vindication (as represented recently in the able work of 
 Kuhl Gemeindeordnvng in den Pastoralbrief.) a motive to minimize it. Thus 
 Holtzmann is exaggerating when he sees in oi Aomm of i Tim. v. 20 an expression 
 for the laity (as was Baur when he saw in Timothy and Titus the prototypes of arch- 
 bishops), but on the other hand he seems to me to say no more than is true in the 
 following passage (J.c. p. 231) : ' Es ist also keine Frage, dass der Ausdruck xapt(rpLa 
 in den Pastoralbriefen die bestimmtere Bedeutung einer, vermittels der Ordination 
 ubertragenen, Amtsgabe besitzt. Erst bei solcher Auffassung versteht sich endlich 
 auch die beidemal stehende Formel TO \<ipi.<rna. tv om, weil ein mit der Begabung 
 zugleich ubertragenes Amtsrecht allerdings seinem Trager mehr einwohnt, als bios 
 beilegt. Fiele die HandauClegung i Tiin. v. 22 mit den bisher besprochenen Stellen 
 in eine Kategorie, so wurde Timotheus hier uberdies noch davor gewarnt werden, 
 die ihm inharirende Gabe vorschnell weiter zu tradiren.' So he quotes Weizsacker 
 (p. 233) : ' Man sieht, hier ist eine ganze festgeschlossene Kette von Begriffen, in 
 welcher kein Ring fehlt ; der Inhalt des Ganzen aber ist das Amt als Inhaber der 
 reinen Lehre und des rechten Geistes, verburgt durch eine formliche und sichere 
 Uebertragung.' ' Das Amt ist daher im eigentlichen Sinne die Lebensbedingung 
 fur den Bestand und Geist der Gemeinde.' 
 
 2 i Tim. v. 22 : \fipax Ta.\fias jirjievi eiriTiflei : cf. Acts vi. 6.
 
 230 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 what St. Paul tells us about the church ministry shall 
 be reserved till we have finished our review of the 
 New Testament literature. 1 
 
 of'thSe"" H. There is very little additional information to be 
 Epistles. derived from the other apostolic Epistles, but there 
 are indications which must not be neglected. It will 
 be borne in mind that, though the apostolic office was 
 essentially ecumenical, yet a distribution, not of area 
 but of races, had been arrived at among the Apostles. 
 It was recognised that St. Paul had been divinely 
 ' intrusted with the gospel of the uncircumcision, even 
 as Peter with the gospel of the circumcision,' and it 
 was accordingly agreed that Paul and Barnabas should 
 evangelize the heathen, while James, Peter, and John 
 preached the same Gospel amongst the Jews. 2 We 
 shall look then in the Epistles of James, Peter, John, 
 and 'Jude, the brother of James,' for information 
 about the ministry in the Jewish Christian com- 
 munities, as well as in the Epistle to the Hebrews. 
 
 1 It ought to be added that St. Paul recognises a ministry of women in the 
 Church ; see Rom. xvi. I : 9oiftiiv TTJI' aSe\<J>r)v itfiMV, oJxrav [xal] SLO.KOVOV TTJS 
 t-KKArjo-ias TTJS ec Keyxpeais. But it is a ministry which is concerned with works of 
 mercy and, if with teaching also, only in private (Acts xviii. 26). St. Paul clearly 
 excludes women from public teaching (i Cor. xiv. 34, 35; i Tim. ii. n, 12). A 
 woman may however have the gift of prophecy (i Cor. xi. 5) and St. Paul apparently 
 contemplated her exercising that in public. We naturally wish that we knew more 
 of the position of prophetesses, like Philip's daughters (Acts xxi. 9), in the earliest 
 Church. On the whole, however, St. Paul clearly excludes women from public 
 teaching; and, at least in his Epistle to Timothy, he is doing this in a general 
 society which allowed great freedom to women. ' Under the Roman Empire we 
 find [in Asia Minor] women magistrates, presidents at games, and loaded with 
 honours. The custom of the country influenced even the Jews, who in at least one 
 case appointed a woman at Smyrna to the position of archisynagogos,' Ramsay, 
 The Ch. in R. E. pp. 67-8. ' The prominence assigned to women was,' Prof. 
 Ramsay explains, 'firstly, pagan rather than Christian, and, secondly, heretical 
 rather than catholic,' pp. 161-2, cf. 403. But it appears that the dignities of women 
 in pagan society were honorary rather than administrative. There is no evidence 
 that they could assist at assemblies or give votes or speak in public. See my 
 Ephesians (John Murray) p. 227. Probably what was allowed and forbidden them 
 in the Church represented pretty fairly the allowances and prohibitions of secular 
 life. 
 
 2 Gal. ii. 7-9. This arrangement was, however, only temporary.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 231 
 
 And so in fact we find throughout those documents 
 evidences more or less pronounced, not only of the 
 apostolic ministry which the writers represent, but 
 also of a local ministry in the several communities. 1 
 By what title are these local ministers known ? In 
 St. Paul's Epistles, as we have seen, they are called 
 first ' presidents,' then ' bishops,' and later in the Pas- 
 toral Epistles also ' presbyters.' Now while the first 
 of these titles is of the most general significance, the 
 second, though it is used in the Old Testament and 
 its use in the Christian Church was certainly influ- 
 enced by this fact, was of common acceptance in 
 the Greek of the empire to express ' commissioners ' 
 or 'superintendents' of many different sorts. 2 The 
 title ' presbyter ' on the other hand was a specially 
 Jewish title, and was in familiar use at any rate in 
 Jerusalem. St. James is pre-eminently a Jew ofst.james. 
 
 1 Thus James writes himself as a teacher with the authority which we know him 
 on other grounds to have held in specially Jewish circles, and speaks (iii. i) of local 
 teachers and (v. 14) more unmistakably of presbyters. 
 
 Peter writes as an 'apostle of Jesus Christ' (i Pet. i. i, cf. 2 Pet. i. i), but 
 identifies himself as a presbyter with the local presbyters (i Pet. v. 1-5) as sharing the 
 same pastoral office. He speaks also (i Pet. iv. 10, n), in language which reminds 
 us of St. Paul's, of the Church as differentiated by different 'charismata' for 
 different ministries intended for the common good. Each man's charisma makes 
 him a 'steward of the manifold grace of God.' The stewardships or charismata of 
 which he especially speaks are those of speaking in God's name and of ministering. 
 If, as is probable, these refer to the presbyterate and the diaconate, we have here 
 another case to add to those of Eph. iv. n and i Tim. v. 17 of the presbyterate being 
 considered a teaching office. 
 
 St. Jude indicates that Korah, the author of revolt against the Old Testament 
 priesthood, had, as well as the self-seeking pastors whom Ezekiel denounced, his 
 followers in the Church of the new covenant (Jude n, 12). 
 
 The Epistle to the Hebrews speaks of 'leaders' (riyov^evoi) in the Christian 
 Church who had spoken the word of God and were passed away, alluding apparently 
 to apostolic teachers (cf. Acts xv. 22, Luke xxiL 26), and he uses the same expression 
 of the rulers of the Church still living, who exercise the office of pastors over the 
 Hebrews, 'watching for their souls as those who shall give account' (Heb. xiii. 
 7, 17), and he bids the Hebrews to ' greet them' (xiii. 24). This title will be con- 
 sidered further in connection with Clement's letter. 
 
 * See App. Note K. on the origin of the terms 'episcopus' and 'presbyter,' in 
 connection with recent criticism.
 
 232 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Jerusalem writing to Jews, 1 and accordingly he uses 
 the term 'presbyters' for the local church rulers 
 among the Jews of the dispersion ; but on the other 
 hand, while Jewish presbyters had been merely judicial 
 officers, and not officers of worship, nor teachers, the 
 Christian presbyters have assigned to them by St. 
 James a ' ministry of healing,' 2 both of body and soul, 
 with accompanying prayer, which has no analogy in 
 the Jewish presbyterate, while it accords naturally 
 
 St. Peter, with the general pastoral functions assigned to them 
 by St. Peter. 3 
 
 St. John. it may surprise us that, whereas St. John is specially 
 connected in authentic tradition with the estab- 
 lishment of the ' monarchical episcopate ' and with the 
 general development of the ministry, we have hardly 
 
 (The 'angels' an y i n f orma tion on the subject in his writings. If. 
 
 prob. sym- * J 
 
 boiic.) indeed, the Apocalypse dates from the end of his life, 
 we shall naturally see in the ' angels ' of the seven 
 Churches of Asia some indirect reference to the re- 
 sponsible bishops. 4 But the mention of these angels 
 cannot be put in evidence, because their primary 
 
 1 See especially the use of the word ' synagogue ' (James ii. 2) for the Christian 
 place of meeting. 
 
 2 The 'elders of the Church' (James v. 14-16) are assumed to have the gift of 
 healing by means of unction, accompanied by their ' prayer of faith ' (cf. St. Mark 
 yi. 13). But as sickness is the symbol, and often the effect, of sin (cf. i Cor. xi. 30), 
 so the healing is spiritual as well as physical it is spiritual absolution with the 
 miraculous sanction and evidence still attached (cf. St. Mark ii. 10) : ' if he have 
 committed sins, it shall be forgiven him.' Then follows a general admonition to 
 confess sins mutually one to another. This probably implies that the sick man 
 would have confessed his sins to the presbyters whom he had summoned. See Origen 
 in Levit. ii. 4. Generally great light has been thrown on this practice of mutual 
 confession among Christians by the passages in the Didache, iv. 14 and xiv. i : ' On 
 the Lord's day gather yourselves together and break bread and give thanks 
 (evxapicmjo-uTe), having first confessed your sins, that your sacrifice may be pure.' 
 The practice was derived from the Jewish synagogue ; cf. Sabatier La Didache pp. 
 47, 48. Cf. also i John i. 9 and Westcott in loc. 
 
 3 i Pet. v. 1-5. St. Peter also (if he does not actually use the word eiruricoirtiv in 
 ver. 2, where the reading is doubtful) implies the use of the term eitCo-Koiros by using 
 it of Christ the 'chief pastor ' (ii. 25, cf. v. 4). 
 
 4 Cf. Origen in Lwc. xiii.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 233 
 
 meaning seems to be symbolical ; 1 they seem to be 
 symbols of the temper or spirit of the different 
 Churches. In the same way, as we have other reasons 
 for believing St. John to have instituted bishops, we 
 shall probably be inclined to see in Diotrephes, with 
 his ambitious self-exaltation and his power ' to cast 
 out of the Church' 2 brethren who had come from 
 St. John, one of these local bishops who was misusing 
 his authority. But here again the indication is too 
 ambiguous to constitute evidence of itself. It remains 
 for us then to seek such additional information, 
 
 1 The angels have been generally taken to be bishops, the use of ' angels ' in Mai. 
 ii. 7 and Eccles. v. 6 being quoted. If this is so, they are addressed as embodying 
 the Church, and Ignatius' language may be compared where he speaks (ad Trail, i) 
 of 'seeing the whole community in the bishop,' and when he passes imperceptibly 
 (ad Folyc. 5, 6) from addressing the bishop of Smyrna to addressing his Church. 
 But the identification of the bishop with the Church in the Apocalypse goes further 
 than this, and the fact that the female personage, Jezebel (ii. 20), seems clearly 
 symbolical would suggest a symbolical meaning for the angels also. So also the use 
 of the whole book leads us to see in the angels symbolic representations of different 
 agencies, e.g. Milligan (on Rev. x. 1-3 in SchafFs Pop. Comment, on the N. T.) Ls 
 certainly right in describing ' the strong angel ' as ' neither the Lord, nor a mere 
 creature executing His will, but a representation of His action. The angel by whom 
 such representation is effected has naturally the attributes of the Being whose action 
 he embodies.' The more in fact one studies the Apocalypse, the more the symbolical 
 character of personages, numbers, and events is impressed upon one. So the angels 
 of the seven Churches seem to be ideal personifications of the temper or genius of the 
 Churches. See Lightfoot Dissert, pp. 109, 200; Simcox Early Ck. Hist. p. 172 n. 1 ; 
 Milligan in loc. For the other sense, see Trench Epp. to the Seven Ch. and Godet 
 in Expositor, Jan. 1888, p. 67. Among the ancients, Arethas of Caesarea, using 
 Andreas and other more ancient authors, interprets the angels first as guardian 
 angels (who are addressed on behalf of the Churches, as masters on behalf of their 
 pupils : eiSus <us oixciovcrdai <>tAct TO. TOW /u.a9rjTOV 6 SiSaoxaAos, eire Karop6iaiia.ro., 
 tire ^mj/iaTa), and then as the Churches themselves (ayyeAov nij 'E<eVov rt\v tv 
 avrj7 eKicXrjo-tai' \eyei); see Cramer's Catena Graec. Pair. N. T. viii. p. 200. So 
 also the writer who passes for Victorinus of Petau, the earliest commentator on the 
 book ; he clearly interpreted the angels as symbolical of classes of individuals, for he . 
 paraphrases the letter to the angel of Ephesus thus : 'ad eos scripsit [loannes] qui 
 et laborant et operantur et patientes sunt et cum videant homines quosdam in ecclesia 
 dispensatores praeposteros, ne dispersio fiat, portant, . . . Haec universa ad laudem 
 spectant et laudem non mediocrem sed tales viros et talem classem et tales electionis 
 homines oportet omnimodo admoneri.' So he deals with the other letters : ' aut ad 
 eos scripsit . . . aut ad eos . . . aut ad eos, etc." Origen in Num. xx. 3 interprets 
 of angels in the strict sense (arid hence Andreas, as above), and so Jerome on 
 Mic. vL init. 
 
 2 3 John 9-10. Diotrephes seems clothed with official power.
 
 234 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 especially on the origin of the local ministry, as can 
 be derived from the Acts of the Apostles, 
 in. Evi- ni. In the Acts of the Apostles we are presented 
 
 dence of the * 
 
 teffxhe ^ rst ^ a ^ W ^ a Ver 7 clear picture of the apostolic 
 apostoiate ministry. Just exception can indeed be taken to 
 
 divinely J J 
 
 appointed, M. Kenan's phrase when he describes ' the divine 
 institution of the hierarchy' as a 'favourite thesis' 
 of St. Luke, 1 just so far as the phrase seems to carry 
 with it too much implication of conscious design in 
 writing ; but it cannot be fairly denied that the 
 divine authority of a hierarchy in the Christian 
 Church does appear conspicuously enough in the 
 course of St. Luke's narrative. 
 
 From the first the disciples appear as a body 
 amongst whom eleven, or after Matthias' election 
 twelve, are held to possess a ministerial office and 
 commission direct from Christ. 2 Upon the whole 
 body, thus differentiated into ministers and people, 
 the Holy Ghost descends and the Church begins her 
 life as the Spirit-bearing body, with the Apostles for 
 
 with her authoritative teachers and for her centre of unity. 
 
 authority; Thi s is sufficiently implied in the phrase which 
 describes the first new converts as 'continuing 
 steadfast in the Apostles' teaching and fellowship, in 
 the breaking of the bread and the prayers.' 3 They 
 are prominent in the early history as representing 
 Christ, acting in His name to work physical miracles of 
 healing on ' those without,' of judgment also on ' those 
 
 1 Les Apdtres p. xxxix. Cf. Sabatier La Didache p. 155 : ' Deja du temps de 
 saint Luc on faisait preceder les decisions du concile de Jerusalem d'un preambule 
 gros de toutes les pretensions hierarchiques romaines' (i.e. such as M. Sabatier 
 thinks were derived from the influence of the Roman Church upon Christianity). 
 
 2 Acts. i. 25 : Siaxovia. Kal airooroAjj : also by implication (ver. 20) en-tocomj. 
 
 8 Acts ii. 42 : TJJ SiSaxil Ttav ajroo-roAuv KCU rfj KOivtavtq, Tfj xAacrei TOV aprou Kai 
 rat? 77poirevx<uSj the phrase riav a7ro<rr6Awi> seems to characterize the whole sentence . 
 See also following note.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 235 
 
 within.' a Again, they have the authority to ordain to 
 those various ministries of the Church the origin of f"^* 
 which will be considered shortly : thus the Church at ^y 
 Jerusalem set the seven (we are told) 'before the of hands> 
 Apostles, and when they had prayed, they laid their 
 hands on them.' 2 When we hear afterwards of those 
 later-added Apostles, Barnabas and Saul, ' appointing 
 elders' in the Churches they founded, 3 we cannot 
 doubt, especially in view of the evidence of the 
 Pastoral Epistles, that the method of appointment 
 was the same method of laying on hands with prayer ; 
 and we shall not be surprised that St. Paul should 
 describe the presbyters at Ephesus, appointed as they 
 must have been by his hands, as none the less insti- 
 tuted by the Holy Ghost. 4 It is indeed not only in 
 the case of the appointment of the ministry that we 
 are led to associate the action of the Holy Ghost with 
 the laying-on of apostolic hands. The narrative of inconfir 
 the Acts elsewhere assures us that the Apostles laid nc 
 their hands on all Christians after their baptism, in 
 order by this means to impart to them that gift of 
 
 1 Acts v. i-n. These judgments brought a great fear not only on the Church 
 but on all who heard of them (ver. n) a fear of the Apostles. Afterwards we are 
 told that they wrought many public miracles and made public appearance as 
 teachers in Solomon's porch (cf. iii. n). Hence it seems necessary to interpret the 
 words that follow ' of the rest durst no man associate himself with them ' (icoAAao-0ai 
 aurois, cf. viii. 29, ix. 26, x. 28) as meaning ' of the rest of the Christians durst no 
 man associate himself with the apostolic college on their public appearances.' A 
 clear distinction appeared between them and the rest of the Christians. 'And the 
 Jews as a whole held them in honour, and the Christian Church made rapid pro- 
 gress.' Only so do we get a natural interpretation of the passage throughout. 
 
 2 Acts vi. 6. 
 
 3 Acts xiv. 23 : \eipOTOirf<ravTes Se avrois KO.T' cKjeAij<ruu' irpe<7/3uTe'pov9. With 
 reference to this word \tiporovflv Holtzmann remarks (I.e. p. 219): 'sprechen 
 philologische Grunde allerdings mehr fur die Bedeutung "erwahlen" schlechthin 
 als fur Hdurch Stimmabgabe erwahlen lassen," ' i.e. it had become a quite general 
 word for ' to elect." 
 
 * Acts xx. 28 I po<re'xTe . . . irairi r<a iroi.it.vita, iv <a vfxa? TO nvev/xa TO aytov 
 fOero eiriaxoirovs. (The (Sen recalls i Cor. xii. 28 : ous fiev fSero 6 8eb? iv TTJ 
 e*tA7)o-ia irpS>rov airoo-ToA.ovs, K.T.\. The Holy Ghost had made them bishops by 
 prophetic indications and the special \dpi.<T^a. bestowed upon them.
 
 236 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 the Holy Ghost which is the essence of the Christian 
 andordina- iif e . The laying-on of hands in 'ordination' is, 
 
 tion ; * 
 
 as we should gather from the Acts and Pastoral 
 Epistles taken together, a determination of this same 
 divine gift to a special ministerial function, or the 
 bestowal of a superadded power. Further we are led 
 to believe that this function of the laying-on of hands 
 at least as a means to the bestowal of the Holy 
 Ghost for Christian life or ministerial office belonged 
 normally to the Apostles alone. 1 
 
 ( 7fts a do 1 not S This gift of the Holy Ghost, which is imparted to 
 dispense every Christian, was in the first days of the Church 
 
 from ordma- 
 
 t'n) commonly accompanied by miraculous signs, such as 
 
 'prophesyings' and 'tongues'; 2 and where the divine 
 gift evidenced by such outward miracles preceded 
 baptism and the laying-on of hands, the instrumen- 
 tality by which the gift was ordinarily communicated 
 followed in part baptism apparently without the 
 
 1 See Acts xix. 6, and especially Acts viii. 15-19, cf. Rom. i. n, ii. Tim. i. 6. 
 There is no such language about authority (efouaia) or instrumentality (8ii) used 
 except of apostles. True, Ananias, a 'layman' apparently, laid hands on St. Paul. 
 Whether this was the occasion of St. Paul receiving the Holy Ghost, as well as 
 recovering sight, is not plain. Acts ix. 17 may suggest it. But, any way, Ananias 
 received a special divine commission to do this thing. And it was essential to St. 
 Paul's apostolate that he should not have received his spiritual gifts through other 
 apostles. Again the prophets and teachers at Antioch lay hands on Barnabas and Saul. 
 But here also we have a special divine authorization ; and it is to set apart two already 
 of their own ' order ' to a special work (xiii. 2). Probably, however, these ' prophets ' 
 held quasi-apostolic ' authority ' to lay-on hands in all cases. Who, unless Barnabas, 
 can have ' confirmed ' the people of Antioch? 
 
 2 I assume that the bestowal of the Spirit was only accompanied by the miraculous 
 gifts, while its essence lay in the bestowal of that presence which makes the 
 Christian the temple of God. The miraculous x a pt< r l JLara passed away, but the 
 underlying gift remained, mediated by the same ' laying-on of hands.' I do not 
 think this can be fairly questioned. In the Acts those who had not yet received 
 ' the laying-on of hands ' are represented not as being without certain miraculous 
 powers, but as not possessing the Spirit. See viii. 16, xix. 3-7. The possession of 
 the Spirit undoubtedly constitutes the essence of Christianity, with or without 
 miraculous powers ; see Gal. iii. 2 and Rom. viii. 9-17, where St. Paul speaks of it 
 as received at a definite moment and as a permanent possession (eAa/Sere, oixei tv 
 v/jtiv). Cf. Hebrews vi. 2 for the close association of baptisms with the laying-on of 
 hands.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 237 
 
 laying-on of hands but it became not the bestowal 
 of a gift so much as the recognition of it. 1 In the 
 same way the ' laying-on of hands ' by the prophets 
 and teachers at Antioch upon Saul and Barnabas, 
 who had been themselves already classed under the 
 same names, can hardly be regarded as more than 
 the recognition by the Church, under the divine 
 inspiration there recorded, of a mission which, at 
 least in St. Paul's case, we have every reason to know 
 came directly from Christ. 2 There may, in fact, have 
 been many cases where the 'gift of government' 
 evidenced by miraculous signs, or the recognised gift 
 of prophetic inspiration, anticipated the appointment 
 to the church office. But the ordination by the 
 Church, where it was not needed as a channel of 
 grace, was needed as its recognition. And the 
 language of St. Paul's Epistle to Timothy and of 
 the Acts makes the imposition of apostolic hands in 
 ordinary cases, whether for ' confirmation ' or 'ordi- 
 nation,' nothing less than the instrument of divine 
 bestowal. 
 
 Once more, the narrative of the Acts brings and power 
 before us in action that power of binding and loosing, loose. 
 that is of legislation with a supernatural sanction, 
 with which Christ endowed His Church. Questions 
 were raised at Antioch as to the obligation of the 
 Jewish law on Gentile converts. Accordingly Paul 
 and Barnabas with others were sent up by 'the 
 brethren ' to confer on this subject with the Apostles 
 at Jerusalem who appear as associated in this func- 
 tion with the elders. There ensued an apostolic 
 conference, resulting in a formal decision by which 
 
 1 Acts x. 44-48 ; cf. x\. 15-17 and the case of St. Paul. 
 
 - Acts xiii. 1-3 ; cf. Gal. i. i, Acts ix. 15, xxii. 14-21, xxvi. 16.
 
 238 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 certain things were loosed and certain others bound 
 i.e. by which a certain amount of conformity to 
 Jewish scruples was required, at least for the time, 
 and in other respects the prescriptions of the law 
 were declared to be not binding on Gentile Christians. 
 This decision, issued in the name of ' the apostles and 
 elder brethren,' was sent to those whom it concerned 
 in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia, with the unmistak- 
 able declaration : ' it seemed good to the Holy Ghost 
 and to us, to lay upon you no greater burdens than 
 these necessary things.' 1 
 (b) The sub- So far then, it must be admitted that the narrative 
 
 apostolic , 
 
 office of the Acts gives us a very clear picture of the 
 apostolic office and authority. But, on the other 
 hand, the indications given us of the position of those 
 
 of prophets ' prophets and teachers,' and other associates of the 
 ' Apostles of whom we also hear, are somewhat in- 
 definite. 2 James, though he apparently was not one 
 of the twelve, is clothed with apostolic authority, 3 
 and (as we shall have occasion to note further) when 
 the Apostles go forth to exercise their universal 
 mission, remains to represent the apostolic office in 
 the Church of Jerusalem. How was he appointed ? 
 Probably not by the Apostles. Probably his 
 authority would have been understood to have been 
 given to him when Christ appeared to him after His 
 resurrection. 4 And it must be remembered that, 
 though 'the Lord's brethren' had not been among 
 the disciples who believed before the passion, there 
 
 1 Act xv. 1-29 ; cf. xvi. 4. 2 Acts xi. 27, xiii. i, xv. 32, xxi. 10. 
 
 3 See esp. Acts xv. 13-21. 
 
 4 i Cor. xv. 7. Cf. Dr. Ch. Wordsworth's Remarks on Dr. Light/oofs Essay 
 p. 19. The tradition in Clement of Alexandria represents James as appointed by 
 the Apostles. But Hegesippus, who is a much better authority, speaks of him as 
 'succeeding to the government of the Church with the Apostles.' This will appear 
 further on.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 239 
 
 had been others who had not only believed but had 
 been commissioned as representatives of Christ. 
 Besides the twelve there had been the seventy, and 
 among the 'hundred and twenty' disciples who 
 awaited the day of Pentecost there must have been 
 some who had received a commission in some respects 
 like that of the Apostles. Tradition assigns this 
 position to the Levite Joseph Barnabas among others. 1 
 We are not then going beyond probabilities if we 
 consider that the original ministerial equipment of 
 the Church before the day of Pentecost consisted of 
 others besides the twelve. Some of these may be 
 amongst the prophets and teachers of whom we hear 
 in the Acts, not as teaching only or foretelling, but 
 as ' ministering to the Lord,' performing, that is, 
 acts of worship and laying on hands to give the 
 recognition of the Church to the mission of Barnabas 
 and Saul. 2 There were, however, other fellow- 
 labourers with the Apostles, who certainly did not 
 belong to the original equipment of the Church. 
 These we should certainly suppose would have re- 
 ceived ordination from those who did. Such would 
 have been St. Paul's sons in the faith, Timothy and 
 Titus, as to the ordination of the former of whom by 
 St. Paul we have positive information, which we 
 naturally extend to similar cases. 3 Such ordination 
 
 1 For Barnabas see Clem, Alex. ap. Euseb. H. E. ii. i. 
 
 2 The Christian prophets in thus combining the ministry of worship with that of 
 preaching recall the functions of Elijah and Samuel.', With the phrase \firovpyovvnov 
 ria nipiia, cf. the Didache xv. i : TT\V Acirovpyuu' rStv JT/XX^IJTCUP coi SiSaoxaAcur. 
 This laying-on of hands, if only in recognition of a divinely-given mission, would 
 probably imply a power to do it in other cases. It should be noticed that, while 
 Paul and Barnabas are here called 'prophets and teachers,' they are afterwards 
 called ' apostles ' (xiv. 4). 
 
 3 Cf. Judas Barsabbas and Silas (Acts xv. 22, 32). Silas becomes St. Paul's 
 companion (ver. 40), and is coupled with Timothy in 2 Cor. i. 19 and in the inscrip- 
 tions of i and 2 Thess.
 
 240 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 again we should suppose A polios to have received ; 1 
 nor is the silence of the Acts on the subject any objec- 
 tion to this view, for that narrative is silent also about 
 his baptism and reception of the laying-on of hands, 2 
 *vhich yet are not only mentioned but emphasized 
 in exactly parallel cases. 3 It will however be of 
 course acknowledged that miraculous evidence of the 
 divine will, such as the Church could recognise, went 
 far to reduce the ceremony of ordination to a lower 
 level of importance than it held in ordinary cases. 
 ( C ) The local Leaving now the order of apostles, with its exten- 
 
 mimstry 
 
 sion to prophets and teachers and other apostolic 
 legates, it remains to collect the information given us 
 in the Acts as to the origin of the local ministry, 
 of presbyters We find the existence of presbyters in the Church at 
 Jerusalem assumed. 4 This is probably to be ac- 
 counted for by the fact that there Jewish ' presbyters ' 
 were an institution of old standing and that the 
 Christian ' synagogue ' naturally had the like. It is 
 however very easy to exaggerate the Jewish char- 
 acter of these Church officers. Later evidence leads 
 us to believe that they were definitely appointed to 
 their office by the Apostles, 6 and that, while they 
 shared their legislative counsels at Jerusalem and 
 were associated in their legislative authority in a 
 matter of church discipline, they were not, as 
 amongst the Jews, merely disciplinary officers. St. 
 James, as we have seen, assigns to them a ministry 
 
 1 St. Paul classes him with the Apostles as 'steward of the divine mysteries, etc. 
 (i Cor. iv. 1-6). 
 
 2 Acts xviii. 24-28. 
 
 3 Acts xix. 1-6. These men had been baptized ' into John's baptism ' (cf. xviii. 25 
 of Apollos : ' knowing only the baptism of John '). St. Paul gave these Christians 
 baptism and confirmation. So again St. Paul himself had received baptism (ix. 17). 
 
 * Acts xi. 30, xv. 2, 4, 6, 23, xvi. 4, xxi. 18. 
 8 Acts xiv. 23.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 241 
 
 of physical and spiritual healing ; St. Peter allots to 
 them the general pastoral function ; and in accord- 
 ance with these indications St. Paul tells them at 
 Ephesus that it is the Holy Ghost who has given 
 them their office and, calling them by the name of 
 overseers or bishops, implies that the government (=< bishops') 
 and nourishment of the Church, 1 in the general 
 sense, belonged to them. The subapostolic evidence 
 concurs in allotting to the presbyter-bishops a clearly 
 spiritual ministry. 2 Here in fact, as elsewhere, the 
 Church adopted a Jewish nomenclature, but infused 
 into the thing to which the old name was given a 
 new spirit ; and the hostility of the Jews to the 
 Church certainly facilitated the process of distin- 
 guishing the ideas attached to the offices of the new 
 Jerusalem from those which belonged to the old. 
 
 Besides the presbyters we hear of the institution and deacons. 
 in the Church at Jerusalem of an inferior office. The 
 occasion of its institution was the complaint of 
 Hellenistic Christian Jews that 'their widows were 
 neglected in the daily ministration,' apparently of 
 food. In order, therefore, that this ministration of 
 Christian charity might be carefully supervised with- 
 out any hindrance to the Apostles in their higher 
 ' ministry of the word,' a new office was created with 
 a view to these ' works of mercy.' Seven, apparently 
 Hellenistic Christians, 3 ' full of the Spirit and of 
 wisdom,' are chosen by the community according to 
 
 1 Acts xx. 28-31. They are to act as pastors, and this implies the double idea of 
 feeding and governing. The former is more closely associated with the word /Sooxeiv 
 than with Troi^aCveiv (St. John xxi. 15-17), but it cannot be excluded from the latter : 
 see Jude 12 eawrous iroi/^atVovre? = feeding themselves. 
 
 2 Clem, ad Cor, 44 : the offering of the eucharistic gifts. The Didache (xv. i) 
 attaches the election of the bishops and deacons with an otiv to the account of the 
 eucharistic service, and associates their Aecrovpyi'a with that of the prophets and 
 teachers. 
 
 3 To judge from their names being Greek ; but cf. Lightfoot Dissert, p. 188. 
 
 Q 
 
 r
 
 242 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 apostolic direction and ordained by the Apostles with 
 the laying-on of hands and prayer. 1 In these seven 
 we must see (with most authorities, ancient and 
 modern) the prototype of the deacons. 2 In the case 
 of some of these first appointed deacons, their peculiar 
 gifts as preachers 3 sufficed to throw into the shade 
 their humbler functions, but it is to be noticed that, 
 though St. Philip can evangelize Samaria and 
 baptize, he does not share the apostolic power to 
 lay on hands. 4 
 
 Summary. We are now in a position to sum up the results 
 derived from our investigation of the origin, nature, 
 and development of the Christian ministry, as it is 
 presented in the writings of the apostolic period. 
 
 (i)The (i) In the first place we have found that the 
 
 conception of the apostolate which was derived from 
 the Gospels is confirmed in the apostolic history. 
 The Apostles are empowered by Christ and inspired 
 by the Spirit as the primary witnesses of Christ's 
 resurrection, stewards of the divine mysteries, am- 
 bassadors and ministers of the effected reconciliation 
 
 1 Acts vi. 1-6. 
 
 2 'So Irenaeus iii. 12. 10, iv. 15. i, etc., among ancients : so with mostmoderns Light- 
 foot and Renan : ' On donna,' says Renan Les Apdtres p. 120, 'aux administrateurs 
 ainsi designes le nom syriaque de Schammaschin, en grec Sidicovoi. On les 
 appelait aussi quelquefois "les Sept" pour les opposer aux "Douze."' On the 
 other hand St. Chrysostom in loc. speaks doubtfully, but implies on the whole 
 that this office antedated both the presbyterate and the diaconate, and was in fact 
 special for this particular need. So CEcumenius : ou Kara, rbv ei> rats eic(cA.T)eri'<us 
 jSafyxoV. Cf. recently Miiller Verfassung, etc., p. 10. See Lightfoot (Dissert. 
 p. 182), who also notes that the office here instituted cannot have been suggested 
 by the ii7rr;pe'r>)s of the synagogue, who was more like a parish clerk. See St. Luke 
 iv. 20. Schurer Gemeindevcrfassung der Juden p. 28. 
 
 3 Philip is called ' the evangelist ' (Acts xxi. 8). This title is generally used in 
 closer connection with the apostolic office, which Philip had not; cf. Eph. iv. n, 
 2 Tim. iv. 5 : Euseb. H. E. iii. 37. Either we must suppose the word to have had, like 
 ' presbyter ' and 'deacon,' a wider as well as a stricter use, or may suppose that 
 Philip became later what, at the period described in Acts vi.. he was not. 
 
 * Acts viii. 12-16.
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 243 
 
 of man to God. Their function is the ministry of 
 the word or divine message, and inasmuch as the 
 word is the basis of a covenant with a Church which 
 is to be its 'pillar and ground,' so this apostolic 
 ministry is not merely one of preaching. It involves 
 the founding and governing of Churches with Christ's 
 authority, the administration-in-chief of discipline, 
 and the accompanying authority to bind and loose 
 with divine sanction. It involves also a ministry of 
 grace. Besides administering the chief sacraments 
 committed to them by Christ, the Apostles appear 
 (with a reservation to be mentioned afterwards) as 
 alone possessing power to communicate the gift of 
 the Holy Ghost by the laying-on of hands. By 
 means of this rite they bestowed both the funda- 
 mental grace of the Spirit's indwelling, which made 
 a Christian the temple of God (and frequently carried 
 with it in the first age a variety of special powers or 
 ' charismata ') and also the particular ' charisma ' 
 which empowered men for the sacred ministry. The 
 Apostles thus appear as the ordainers of an official 
 clergy in the Churches, by communicating to them 
 through the laying-on of hands an empowering gift 
 of the Holy Ghost. The presbyters in some, or all, 
 cases of ordination assisted at this rite, but, as the 
 evidence suggests, to give their assent and witness, 
 not as chief agents. 
 
 (2) This apostolic ministry is in its essence uni-(2)Thesub- 
 
 , T . apostolic 
 
 versal. It is true that a temporary agreement ministry, 
 assigned to Paul and Barnabas the evangelization 
 of the Gentiles, while James, Peter, and John kept 
 themselves to the Jews ; it is true, further, that of 
 these last-named ' Apostles,' St. James was very 
 early localized at Jerusalem ; still, in its primary
 
 244 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 character, the apostolate is not a localized but a 
 ' general ministry of the word.' And in this general 
 ministry others share. St. James himself was not 
 an apostle in the sense of being one of the twelve. 
 Further, side by side with the Apostles, we hear of 
 ' prophets ' and ' teachers ' and ' evangelists ' names 
 somewhat indefinitely used who shared the apostolic 
 function of teaching. And, though they never 
 appear as clothed with the same primary authority 
 as the twelve, yet ' prophets and teachers ' share also 
 the ministry of worship and the laying-on of hands. 
 We recognise then an extension of the apostolic 
 function in some of its main features (a) to ' prophets/ 
 whose authority was guaranteed by the permanent 
 possession of those miraculous powers which in the 
 first age witnessed to the inner presence of the 
 Spirit. Such men would have received either 
 Christ's own commission before or after He left 
 the earth, or, failing this, the recognition, as by the 
 laying-on of hands of those who were apostles and 
 prophets before them, of that divine mission which 
 their miraculous ' gifts ' evidenced : (b) to apostolic 
 men like Timothy and Titus, known probably as 
 ' teachers ' and ' evangelists,' who without, as far as 
 we know, sharing miraculous power, had yet im- 
 parted to them by the laying-on of apostolic hands 
 what was essentially apostolic authority to guard 
 the faith, to found and rule Churches, to ordain and 
 discipline the clergy. 
 ( 3 )presb y . (3) Under this general ministry of the Apostles 
 
 ter-bishops \ ' . - ,, , , . . 
 
 and their fellow-workers we find a local ministry of 
 ' presbyters ' or ' bishops,' who are appointed by the 
 Apostles and ordained by the laying-on of hands to 
 share in some particular community the pastorate
 
 V.] The Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 245 
 
 and stewardship which Christ instituted in His 
 Church. They are the local ministers of discipline 
 this being the function which was attached of old 
 to the Jewish presbyterate but they are as well the 
 ' superintendents ' in general of local affairs, the 
 administrators of the Churches ; and as the Churches 
 are spiritual societies, so their function is spiritual. 
 These local pastors are called also ' teachers ' in the 
 Epistle to the Ephesians, and we have no reason to 
 suppose that they were not from the first, in a sense, 
 ' ministers of the word,' though in subordination to 
 apostles, prophets, and teachers. Again, since the 
 earliest subapostolic writers speak of ' the offering 
 of the gifts' or the ministry of the eucharist as the 
 special function of the ' bishop,' and St. James 
 presents the presbyters to us as exercising a ministry 
 of healing, both physical and spiritual, we need not 
 hesitate to regard them as having been from the 
 first ministers of the sacraments. 
 
 (4) We are also presented with a subordinate ( 4 ) Deacons 
 ministry of deacons. If their primary function was 
 
 to administer alms, yet they are also presented to 
 us as baptizing and teaching, at least when they 
 were endowed with qualifying gifts, though probably 
 this function did not belong to their office. Besides 
 we find a female ' diaconate' as well as instances of and 
 ' prophetesses ' in the Church, with regard to whose 
 public ministry however we have no certain informa- 
 tion. We also hear of other leading Christians who 
 specially addicted themselves to works of mercy and 
 received a corresponding authority. 
 
 (5) Finally the Pastoral Epistles give us an un- ( 5 > The con- 
 mistakable picture of the conception attached by or 
 
 the Apostle St. Paul to the ceremony of ordination.
 
 246 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 He regarded the laying-on of his hands as the 
 instrumentality through which Timothy received a 
 special empowering gift of the Holy Ghost, which 
 in virtue of this ceremony was ' in him ' as a thing 
 he might neglect or use, but which in either case 
 was in him as at once his power and his responsibility. 
 And we cannot but extend this conception to the 
 ordinations of other clergy which Timothy is com- 
 missioned in his turn to make by the same ceremony 
 of the laying-on of hands. Here we have the 
 sacerdotal conception of a special order in the 
 Church, differentiated by a special endowment. 
 Evidence is Two points may be mentioned in which the 
 witness of the New Testament needs supplementing 
 by the witness of the Church. 
 
 0) exact First. We have no clear information as to the 
 
 functions : limitation of the functions of the different orders in 
 the Church, except that to the ' viri apostolici ' alone 
 is the power attributed to impart the gift of the 
 Holy Ghost by laying-on of hands. We have no 
 clear information as to who exactly can celebrate 
 the eucharist or who can baptize. But we must re- 
 member that the New Testament does witness to a 
 binding or loosing power in the Church and to a 
 continuity in the Church's life. This enables us to 
 rest satisfied with the fact that the principle of a 
 ministry with different grades of function and power 
 is given us in the apostolic age, and to accept in 
 detail the mind of the Church, as soon as it declares 
 itself, as representing the mind of the Spirit. 
 (H) form of Second. We have no determining evidence as to 
 mini^u^ 6 the exact form which the ministry of the future was 
 to take. True the ministry of ' bishops ' and deacons 
 does appear in the New Testament as an almost
 
 V.] T/te Ministry in the Apostolic Age. 247 
 
 essentially subordinate ministry, and we have clear 
 evidence that the apostolic office admitted of being 
 extended and localized, as in the case of St. James 
 and (more or less) of St Timothy and St. Titus ; 
 but all that the New Testament can be said to give 
 us clearly is the principle that the church ministry 
 is a thing received from above with graduated 
 functions in different offices, so that it follows as a 
 matter of course that there would always be persons 
 who had the power to minister and persons who had 
 also the power to ordain other ministers ; with the 
 corresponding position that only those who had the 
 power communicated to them could exercise the 
 function. What we do not get, then, is a distinct 
 instruction as to what form the ministry was to 
 take. Were the local bishops to receive additional 
 powers, such as would make them independent of 
 any higher order? Or were the apostles and 
 apostolic men, like Timothy and Titus, to perpetuate 
 their distinct order? and, if so, was it to be per- 
 petuated as a localized or as a general order ? These 
 questions are still open.
 
 CHAPTER VI 
 
 THE MINISTRY IN THE SUBAPOSTOLIC AGE 
 
 Two moments in the history of the Christian 
 ministry have hitherto come under our notice. First, 
 we have traced back the ministry of bishops, presby- 
 ters, and deacons, as church history makes us familiar 
 with it, to the dim period of the middle of the second 
 century. Secondly, we have seen it take its rise at 
 the apostolic fountain-head. We have, so to speak, 
 watched the Divine Founder of the Church separate 
 and educate and institute the apostolate, and we have 
 watched the Apostles at work, after the withdrawal 
 of His visible presence, with the full consciousness of 
 divine commission and authority. And in doing 
 this we could not but perceive that, while in a cer- 
 tain sense they exercised a unique function so far, 
 that is, as they were the original witnesses and 
 heralds of the revelation given in Christ, in another 
 sense they held a stewardship and pastorate of souls, 
 a function of government and a corresponding power, 
 which they intended to perpetuate in the life of the 
 Church : the Church was not to develop her ministry 
 from below, but to receive it from above by apostolic 
 authorization. Thus we have found in the records of 
 the New Testament the origin and title-deeds of a 
 permanent ministry in the Church, the outcome of 
 
 243
 
 CH. VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 249 
 
 the apostolate, and we have found in the latter half 
 of the second century that this ministry has taken 
 shape in the episcopal successions of the Churches, 
 which claim to perpetuate the apostolate in certain 
 of its most fundamental functions. Now we Questions 
 approach another group of questions. What are hh e the 
 the links which connect the ministry of the apostolic ministry. ' 
 age with that of the age of Irenaeus ? are they such 
 as to justify the claims which Irenaeus makes for the 
 episcopate ? In particular, does the history, so far as 
 we can trace it, suggest that the apostolic authority 
 was perpetuated from the first in a special office 
 superior to that of the presbyters, though it came 
 shortly to be known by a title at first synonymous 
 with the presbyterate, viz. the episcopate ? Or does 
 the evidence, on the other hand, lead us to believe 
 that the permanent functions of government and or- 
 dination hitherto exercised by apostles and apostolic 
 men were, so to speak, put into commission in the local 
 colleges of presbyter-bishops, and that subsequently 
 these supreme functions, hitherto belonging to all 
 in common, came to be limited to one who alone 
 retained the title of bishop ? There is of course a 
 third possibility, viz. that the functions exclusively 
 discharged by the general or apostolic order in the 
 first days (for instance, that of the laying-on of 
 hands) lapsed altogether, and the Church of the 
 second century, so to speak, redeveloped an apostolic 
 order of bishops from below. With a view to 
 answering the questions thus presented, we proceed 
 to examine the historical links afforded by the sub- Links of 
 apostolic documents.
 
 250 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 I 
 
 scopatelT The first link is that supplied by the episcopate in 
 Jerusalem. j erusa i em derived from James. ' James/ says Hege- 
 james the sippus, ' receives the Church in succession with the 
 line of a Apostles.' l This corresponds to the evidence of the 
 New Testament. James ranks with the Apostles ; 2 
 but, unlike the Apostles, he is localized in Jerusalem, 
 where he presides with the presbyters, 3 and where at 
 the apostolic conference he seems to hold the office 
 of president and speaks with some degree of decisive 
 authority, suggesting and probably framing the 
 apostolic decree. 4 Thus it has been common from 
 the earliest times to see in James the 'bishop of 
 Jerusalem ' in the later sense, i.e. a localized apostolic 
 ruler of the Church, and this commends itself to 
 most modern critics. 6 But though localized, his per- 
 sonal reputation and apostolic character made him a 
 universal authority with Jewish Christians. 6 This is 
 
 1 ap. Euseb. H. K. ii. 23 : SiaSe\erai TIJC eKK\rj(riav fiera. ruiv aTrtxrroAwi'. 
 
 2 Gal. i. 19, ii. 9 ; Acts xv. 
 
 3 Gal. i. 19 ; Acts xii. 17, xxi. 18. 
 
 4 Acts xv. 13, 19, 20. See Lightfoot Dissert, p. 197. 
 
 8 Clement of Alexandria (ap. Euseb. //. E. ii. i) says : ' Peter and James and 
 John, after the assumption of the Saviour, though even the Lord had assigned them 
 special honour, did not claim distinction, but elected James the Just bishop of 
 Jerusalem.' 'As early as the middle of the second century,' says Dr. Lightfoot 
 (p. 208), ' all parties concur in representing him as a bishop in the strict sense of the 
 term.' He refers to Hegesippus ap. Euseb. H. E. ii. 23, iv. 22, and to the Clemen- 
 tines, Horn. xi. 35, Ep. Petr. init., Ep. Clem, init., Recog. i. 43, 68, 73, etc. He 
 himself concurs : James ' can claim to be regarded as a bishop ' (p. 197). He gave, 
 says Mr. Simcox (Early Ch. Hist. p. 50), ' it is scarcely inaccurate to say, the first 
 example of a diocesan bishop.' Cf. Miiller Verfassung p. 12. 
 
 B Gal. ii. 11-14 illustrates St. James' influence, however little those who 'came 
 from ' him acted as he would have had them act ; cf. the opening of his own epistle. 
 Hegesippus gives a sacerdotal colour to his office ; see Harnack Expositor, May 
 1887, p. 327. He was held in high regard amongst non-Christian Jews, and was 
 known from the protection given by his constant intercessions as the jrepiox*) TOU 
 Xaov; see Heges. ap. Euseb. H. E. ii. 23; Josephus Ant. Jud. xx. 9. i; cf. 
 Simcox I.e. p. 123.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 251 
 
 the historical basis for the ' archiepiscopal ' and even 
 papal dignity assigned to him in the Ebionite tradi- 
 tions. 1 When the hostility of the extreme Jewish 
 nationalists led to his being put to death for ' break- 
 ing the law' just before the siege of Jerusalem, 
 Symeon was elected to take his place, who, like 
 James, was a relative of Jesus Christ. Hegesippus, 
 whom Eusebius speaks of as ' having been born in 
 the time of the first succession from the Apostles,' 
 apparently recorded his election by the Apostles 
 themselves, 2 and certainly distinctly identifies his 
 office with that of James and calls it a bishopric. 
 He also mentions that there was a disappointed rival 
 for the see called Thebuthis, who subsequently raised 
 
 1 Recog. i. 73 and Ep. Clem. init. 'bishop of bishops,' and 'archbishop.' He 
 exercises a quasi-papal authority over Peter ; Ep. Clein. i, Recog. i. 17, 72. 
 
 2 ap. Euseb. H. E, iii. 32, iv. 22 ; cf. Lightfoot Dissert, pp. 202, 208. Eusebius 
 says, iii. n : 'After the martyrdom of James and the taking of Jerusalem which 
 immediately ensued, it is recorded (Aoyos (care'xei) that those of the Apostles and of 
 the Lord's disciples who were still alive came together from all parts, with those 
 who were related to our Lord ; for of them also there were still several alive : and 
 that they all held conference together as to whom they ought to select as worthy to 
 succeed to James (df iov nijs 'Iaxci/3ov SiaSox'n^). And that they all with one mind 
 approved of Symeon the son of Clopas ... as worthy of the throne of the parish 
 there, who was a cousin as they say of the Saviour. For Hegesippus relates that 
 Clopas was a brother of Joseph.' The authority for this meeting may fairly, as 
 Rothe maintains and Dr. Lightfoot admits, be assigned to Hegesippus. 
 
 The question arises granted this meeting historical, as it well may be can it be 
 supposed that it not only elected a bishop of Jerusalem but also issued a general 
 decree for the establishment of episcopacy? Such a 'second apostolic council' 
 forms the basis for the supposed apostolic legislation of the Constitutions, and the 
 establishment of ' monepiscopacy ' seems to be assigned to it by Ambrosiaster on 
 Eph. iv. 12 (' prospiciente concilio '). Jerome probably has the same meaning when 
 he assigns the establishment of episcopacy to a formal ' decretum,' apparently of the 
 Apostles (see on Tit. i. 5). Besides this Rothe (Anfange pp. 351-392) quotes for the 
 council the expression of Ignatius, TO Siaray^ara. riav <iiro<rrdAioi' (ad Trail. 7), 
 and the expression of the second of Pfaff"s fragments, attributed to Irenaeus, at 
 Sevrepai Ttav aTTooroAoji' Siaraf eis. He also thinks that the ambiguous language of 
 Clement's letter (c. 44) supports the same view. He holds that it was on this occa- 
 sion that the Apostles so distributed the work amongst them as that Asia, according 
 to a tradition mentioned by Origen (ap. Enseb. H. E iii. i), 'was assigned to John.' 
 This evidence is discussed fully by Dr. Lightfoot Dissert, p. 204 f., and most people 
 will agree with him that it affords a very insecure basis for the idea of a formal 
 second council of the Apostles legislating for the establishment of episcopacy.
 
 252 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 a schism and ' made a beginning of corrupting the 
 virgin purity of the Church' with false doctrines. 
 No one apparently supposes that the Jerusalem 
 episcopate from this date was not continuous. 1 It is 
 plain then that here at any rate the episcopal office 
 was not only developed under apostolic patronage, 
 but was in direct continuity with the apostolate, as 
 represented by James, who, though not one of the 
 twelve, ranked and acted with them : and whether 
 the presbyters at Jerusalem were ever known as 
 'bishops' or no, certainly the episcopal authority 
 never belonged to them. 
 
 who at first But this earliest episcopate at Jerusalem had one 
 
 femfiyof 6 unique feature. It was held by relatives of Christ. 
 
 Symeon, our authority tells us, was chosen as ' the 
 
 cousin of the Lord ' ; he was ' a descendant of David 
 
 and a Christian.' z And we have other evidence of a 
 
 tendency in the Jewish Christian Church of Palestine 
 
 to prefer for ecclesiastical offices of authority those 
 
 who could thus claim royal blood. Thus St. Jude's 
 
 othersof this grandsons 'of the family of the Lord,' who were 
 
 familyhelda . ,, 
 
 less localized compelled (as Hegesippus tells us) to appear before 
 
 authority. , v 
 
 Domitian in order to satisfy him that the empire was 
 in no peril from their royal claims, when they were 
 dismissed, became ' rulers of the Churches,' or ' rulers 
 of every Church.' 3 This last expression (which 
 seems to be Hegesippus' own) would probably indi- 
 cate that, while there was a local episcopate at 
 
 1 Eusebius' list of subsequent bishops of Jerusalem (ff. E. iv. 5) is not apparently 
 derived from Hegesippus. See Lightfoot I.e. p. 209 n. 2 . 
 
 2 Euseb. ff. E. iv. 22 : ov TrpoeOeiro Trajres, OVTOL avityiov TOV /cvpiou, Sevrepov. 
 
 3 See ap. Euseb. ff. E. iii. 20 and 32. In the first case Eusebius, apparently 
 quoting Hegesippus in the oratio obliqua, says that they ^yijeroo-ftu riav enncArja-tii'. 
 In the second passage he quotes his actual words : irporjyovvraj. 7ra<n)s e(cicAi)o-iav. 
 This is therefore the more trustworthy expression. Dr. Hatch says (B. L. p. 89) 
 ' they presided in other Churches ' ; but Hegesippus seems to give them a more 
 general authority.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 253 
 
 Jerusalem, there was a more general authority 
 assigned, amongst the Jewish Christians of Palestine, 
 to these members of the royal family of Christ not, 
 however, as the case of Symeon would assure us, by 
 mere right of birth, but by due appointment. Chief 
 authority in the Church was not yet, even among 
 Jewish Christians, in all cases a localized or diocesan 
 authority. And this is the evidence of the next 
 document to be considered. 
 
 II 
 
 The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles or, as it was n. The 
 probably originally called, the Teaching of the 
 Apostles? is a document which we may assume to its general 
 belong probably to the first century, and to have c 
 been composed by a Jewish Christian for a Christian 
 community also Jewish in tone. There were reasons 
 for attributing it to some remote district of Syria or 
 Palestine, but recent evidence leads us to think 
 rather of Egypt. 2 The theology which it represents 
 is of a very inadequate nature, when compared with 
 the teaching of the New Testament, and suggests in 
 fact nothing so much as the condition of belief of 
 those Hebrew Christians to whom the Epistle to the 
 Hebrews was directed, in order to lift them out of 
 the stage of rudimentary knowledge in which they 
 were into some more adequate conceptions of the 
 person of Christ, of His priesthood and mediation in 
 the Church. It will cause no surprise that there 
 
 1 See Dr. Warfield Bibliotheca Sacra, Jan. 1886, p. no. 
 
 - ' I should conjecture [the Didache], on account of its strongly Jewish character, 
 to have had its birth in the countr^ east of the Jordan, where Christian Jews were 
 numerous ' (Salmon Introd. p. 612) ; but see further on the whole subject of the 
 Didache App. Note L.
 
 254 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 should have existed in the latter part of the first 
 century a community of Jewish Christians with very 
 imperfect doctrinal instruction, perhaps in a district 
 remote from any centre of apostolic influence ; and, 
 though we shall not look to a writing emanating 
 from amongst them for much light on Christian 
 theology, we shall look with great interest to their 
 form of church organization. 
 
 its church In the Didache then we are presented with a form 
 Sol?; 1112 * of Church ministry which ought not to perplex any 
 local bishops one acquainted with the Acts of the Apostles. We 
 and deacons, \^ v& as i oca i o ffi cers bishops and deacons, who are 
 elected specially with a view to the conduct of 
 worship in the community. 1 But, as in the apostolic 
 church, these local officers are not the chief figures in 
 with the organization. Over them are ' apostles,' ' pro- 
 
 prophet's, phets,' and ' teachers,' who exercise a ministry not 
 over t thm? rs yet localized in any particular Church. 2 The apostles 
 are not indeed the twelve ; they correspond to what 
 we should suppose is meant by the ' evangelist ' 
 of the New Testament; they are 'ambulatory' 
 messengers of the Gospel, 3 and are almost identi- 
 fied with the prophets, 4 who are better defined 
 
 1 xv. I : \eipoTovrj<Ta.Tf ovv eaurots eiritncoirovs (tat SIOKOVOVS. This o5v connects the 
 election of the officers with c. xiv about the Sunday celebration of the ' pure sacrifice. ' 
 It will be noticed that nothing is said about the bishop in the passage (xiii. 4) about 
 almsgiving. We should not however be right in assuming that the bishop had 
 nothing to do with this, any more than concluding from c. vii that the bishop had 
 nothing to do with baptizing. The community in fact is addressed as a whole. 
 They are directed to baptize, to fast, to give alms, to pray, to come together on the 
 Lord's Day and confess their sins and celebrate their thank-offering, and then, with 
 a view to the due performance of all these functions, they are directed to elect for 
 themselves bishops and deacons. 
 
 - xi. 3, xiii. 2. 
 
 3 They are perhaps like the ' apostles ' of Rom. xvi. 7, Andronicus and Junias. 
 For the use of the word ' teacher ' we may compare the Ep. ad Diognet. 1 1 : aTroordAoji/ 
 yei/d/nei/os /xaOrjTrjs yiVofiai SifiacrxaAo; eOviav. (This chapter, however, is not part of 
 the original letter.) 
 
 4 The apostle who stays in a Church more than two days is called a ' false prophet ' 
 (xi. 5) ; again (xi. 6) if he ask for money, he is a ' false prophet.'
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Sub apostolic Age. 255 
 
 figures than either apostles or teachers. These re- 
 presentatives of the Church at large, when they visit 
 a community of Christians, are first of all to be tested 
 by the standard of right teaching and of moral 
 character. 1 The true apostle is to be distinguished 
 by the absence of any selfish motive ; any sign of an 
 inclination to fasten himself upon a Church or to 
 abandon the holy poverty of his vocation is to stamp 
 him as a false prophet. The prophet too is to be 
 tested by his character and conformity to the truth 
 which he teaches, but when once he has been 
 approved, his inspired utterances are not to be sub- 
 jected to any criticism. This would be a sin which 
 cannot be forgiven. He is to be listened to with 
 reverent acceptance and allowed the freedom, which 
 the old prophets had, to perform exceptional acts 
 'for a sign ' or in a mystery. 2 He has freedom also 
 to give thanks in the eucharistic celebration without 
 the restriction of any set form ; 3 and receives the 
 first fruits of all the produce of the community, 
 because the prophets are the Christian ' high-priests.' 4 
 Clearly then these prophets, with the apostles and 
 teachers, occupy the first rank in the church ministry, 
 but, as we saw reason in the apostolic age to believe 
 that the local ' clergy ' shared fundamentally the 
 same spiritual ministry as the : apostles, only in a 
 subordinate grade, so here we have it specified that 
 the bishops and deacons exercise the same ministry 
 
 2 iv. i, xi. ii. I do not wish to express any certainty about the meaning of these 
 words ; see Taylor Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, pp. 82-92. 
 
 3 x. 7 : TOIS Se 7rjxxJ>7jTous eirirprrr fvxaf>i<rrfiv oera 0e'Aov<rtv. 
 
 4 xiii. But ver. 4 : ' if you have no prophet, give to the poor.' It is probably im- 
 plied that the prophet will^himself, when he is present, minister to the wants of the 
 poor. He could not take the first fruits for himself only without coming under the 
 category of a 'false prophet.'
 
 256 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 as the prophets and teachers, and are therefore not 
 to be ' overlooked.' l 
 
 So far then the indications of this document 
 suggest a state of church government closely akin 
 to what we should suppose would have existed in 
 apostolic and subapostolic days in any community 
 not under the direct supervision of the twelve. 
 There are bishops and deacons, and over them 
 prophets and teachers and apostles in the sense of 
 evangelists, men belonging to a ministry as yet 
 
 The prophet, unlocalized, and, in the case of the prophets at 
 least, inspired. But two points specially require 
 notice. 
 
 (i)by'sett. (i) It is specified that the prophet has the right 
 
 ling ' would i). r 1 /- 1 i i o -r 
 
 become a to settle in any of the Churches he visits. 2 It is 
 just in this context that he is declared to be the 
 proper recipient of all first fruits and the ' high- 
 priest' of the community. Can we doubt then that, 
 in the event of this prophetic teacher taking up his 
 permanent residence in any Church, with his 
 authority as an inspired man, with his free power of 
 eucharistic celebration, and with his ' high-priestly ' 
 dignity, he would have become, by whatever name 
 he was called, the bishop of the community in the 
 later sense? As then we have in St. James the first 
 instance of a member of the apostolic ministry 
 localized in a single Church, so the Teaching seems 
 to give us an indication that the settling of prophets 
 
 1 C. xv, after providing for the election of fit persons as bishops and deacons, 
 afi'ous TOV Kvpiov, ai'Spas irpaeis (eai a</uAapyvpovs cai aA^Sei? <cal SeSoKijxacrficVous, 
 continues : vji.lv yap AeirovpyoCo-i al avroi TT)V AeiToupyi'ac rtav 7rpo<^r)Ta)i/ ica! 
 &iSa<TKO.\uiv JXT/ o$v ijrepiSijTe avrovV aural yap eitfip 01 Terifxij/neVoi vjmuii' /xcra riav 
 n i po<^T)T<li' Kal &iScuTK<i\(av. I shall remark further on this word TCTifiij/ueVoi in 
 connection with the Epistle of Clement. 
 
 2 xiii. i : n-a? Se 7rpo<J"iTTjs aAr/flti/os, Ot\<av (caflrjtrai Trpbs vfxas, dfio? <rri rijv 
 rpofyrpi avrov, (C.T.X.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 257 
 
 would have been at least one way in which the 
 transition was effected from the apostolic ministry 
 to that of the later Church. What in fact was Poly- 
 carp of Smyrna, or Ignatius of Antioch, but a 
 prophet who had become a bishop ? * Thus the 
 Teaching gives no countenance to the idea that in 
 the region which it represents the ' bishops ' (i.e. pres- 
 byters) and deacons would ever have held the place 
 of chief authority in the Church. 
 
 (2) The community in the Teaching are exhorted (2) must 
 
 ' , , have before 
 
 to elect their bishops and deacons; we have here a held the 
 more democratic mode of election than is general. 2 i^yTng^n 
 Nothing is said of any control over the election, 
 or of any ordination from above by laying-on of 
 hands. Now some modern critics show a tendency 
 to exalt the Didache in this respect as a source of 
 evidence over the Pastoral Epistles and the Acts of 
 the Apostles ; and undoubtedly, if we are to take 
 this anonymous writing of very ambiguous doctrinal 
 character and exalt it as a criterion of what early 
 Christianity meant over writings whose genuineness 
 and apostolic authority there is no good reason to 
 doubt, we shall probably see grounds for believing 
 that the subapostolic Church rated not only church 
 orders, but also baptism and the eucharist at a very 
 low estimate. Believing, however, the Pastoral 
 Epistles and the Acts to be genuine documents, we 
 
 1 Ignatius claims the gift of prophecy : ad Philad. 7. For Polycarp, see Mart. 
 Polyc. 16 : ' having been an apostolic and prophetic teacher, bishop of the holy 
 Church in Smyrna,' and cf. c. 5, where he foresees his own martyrdom by means of a 
 vision. On ' teachers ' becoming bishops, see Kuhl Genuindeord. p. 131. 
 
 3 In the Acts and the Pastoral Epistles the man of apostolic authority appoints 
 elders : so also in Clement's Epistle they are appointed from above, ' with the con- 
 sent of the whole Church ' (c. 44). Here the Church simply elects, and the same is the 
 case in the Egyptian Church Ordinances, where very small communities of twelve 
 are contemplated electing their bish'op (in the later sense). It should not of course 
 be forgotten that the election of ' the seven ' in the Acts was made by the community. 
 
 R
 
 258 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 naturally prefer to look at so questionable a writing 
 as the Didache in the light of apostolic practice and 
 injunction. The question we ask is this : Is the 
 evidence of the Didache incompatible with the 
 evidence about ordination which we derive from 
 apostolic sources ? The answer is, we think, in the 
 negative. The Didache is silent about ordination, 
 but it is silent also about all ' laying-on of hands.' 
 Yet we know that there was closely associated in the 
 minds of the early Church, and especially of its 
 Jewish members, with the doctrine of baptisms that 
 of the laying-on of hands. 1 The silence of the Didache 
 about ordination then, like other instances of silence, 
 proves too much, if it is to be taken as equivalent to 
 ignorance. It can be accounted for easily enough 
 with a little consideration. The Didache appears to 
 be a manual of directions for the local church. It 
 does not presume to dictate to the prophets. 2 It 
 says, therefore, nothing about the functions which do 
 not belong to the local church with the local officers. 
 Now all the evidence of the apostolic documents leads 
 us to believe that the function of the laying-on of 
 hands did not belong to the local officers, but to 
 apostles and apostolic legates and also, as appeared, 
 to certain prophets and teachers, the associates of 
 apostles. As, therefore, we find the prophets in the 
 Didache performing that ' liturgy ' which is assigned to 
 them also in the Acts, 3 what is more reasonable than 
 to suppose that to them would have belonged as well 
 that ' laying-on of hands ' which in the same passage 
 of the Acts is also assigned to them ? We may well 
 believe then that in the communities represented by 
 the Didache^ the bishops and deacons would have 
 been elected by the whole body but ordained with 
 
 1 See esp. Hebr. vi. a. 2 x. 7, xi. 7, n. 3 Acts xiii. 2.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in tJie Subapostolic Age. 259 
 
 laying-on of hands by some one of the prophetic 
 ' high priests ' on their occasional visits. 
 
 The picture which is here given us of Churches in cr. the 
 the subapostolic age still governed by a local body Eu^ S bms 
 of bishops, 1 while the higher authority in the word ev 
 and sacraments remained with men who exercised 
 an 'ambulatory' ministry, may be compared with 
 the picture that Eusebius draws of the activity of 
 evangelists in immediate succession to the Apostles. 
 He describes how they went among the heathen, 
 laying the foundations of the faith in some places, 
 and appointing pastors in others to whom they 
 entrusted 'the husbandry' of those just brought 
 within the pale, while they themselves went forth 
 into new fields ; how they had still many extra- 
 ordinary powers working in them ; and how it 
 would be ' impossible for him to enumerate by name 
 all those who in the first succession to the Apostles 
 became pastors or evangelists in the Churches over 
 the whole world.' 2 We have only to suppose that 
 these missionaries with their miraculous gifts not only 
 founded Churches but also for a time, like the 
 Apostles to whom they succeeded, supervised them 
 on occasional visits, and we have a picture, with 
 merely the substitution of the title evangelist, very 
 like that which the Didache presents. And it must 
 not be forgotten that the earliest recorded traditions 
 of the Syriac Church pointed back not, like those of 
 Asia and of the West, to twelve Apostles, but to 
 seventy-two, as having founded the successions of 
 the priesthood in their communities. 3 
 
 1 Who are of course equivalent to presbyters though they are not called so. See 
 App. Note K. . 
 
 2 Euseb. iii. 37. These evangelists are described as -n\v -aftwn\v TOIV rijs rSiv 
 
 3 See above, pp. it 8, 119 and note.
 
 260 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 It only remains to add that this is the latest 
 
 document which presents us with prophets exercis- 
 
 Prophets ing any ministerial function as such. It is true that 
 
 cease, as, i i i i T i-r-vi 
 
 such, to hold later we have bishops like Ignatius and Polycarp 
 
 the ministry. , . f , , , , . 
 
 who in fact are prophets but they exercise their 
 functions not as prophets but as bishops. The 
 power of prophecy had not died out when Hennas 
 saw his visions, or when Irenaeus wrote against 
 heresies, or when Ammia and Quadratus pro- 
 phesied l ; but the prophets held no official 
 rank. So far as they had in early times been the 
 chief teachers of the Church, their ' high-priestly ' 
 functions and their teaching 'chair' passed to the 
 bishops 2 : in a minor sense, the ' readers of holy 
 Scripture in the congregation' 3 were accounted 
 
 1 Euseb. v. 17. See App. Note H. 
 
 2 The high-priesthood ascribed by Hippolytus to the bishops (Kef. Omn. Haer. 
 prooem. quoted in App. Note G) seems to be specially connected with teaching 
 authority: he speaks of a 'grace and high-priesthood and teaching' which the 
 bishops hold in succession to the Apostles. So Polycrates describes St. John as a 
 ' priest, wearing the mitre, and witness and teacher ' (ap. Euseb. H.E. iii. 31). So 
 again the xade'jpa of the bishops was first of all the chair of the teacher. Thus in 
 the Clementines (Ep. Clem. 2) St. Peter speaks : KAiy/uej'Ta TOVTOV firi<ricorrov vjtii 
 XeipoTori, <a TT\V f^v rtav \6yiav Triorevio KaQeSpav. So in Irenaeus the office of 
 the bishop is conceived of primarily as carrying with it the 'charisma veritatis 
 certum ' (iv. 26. 2), and this coincides with Hegesippus" view of the episcopal succes- 
 sion. It is also noticeable that the right of extempore eucharist seems to have 
 passed to the bishop, as in Justin Martyr Apol. i. 67 ; cf. Did. x. 7. 
 
 3 The prayer for the ordination of a reader in Apost. Const, viii. 22 invokes upon 
 him ' the prophetic spirit ' (cf. the Gk. Vers. of the Syriac Didascalia quoted by 
 Harnack, Texte u. Untersuch. Band ii. H. 3. p. 77) ; and the western writers on 
 church offices from Isidore down into the later middle ages regard the reader's office 
 as a continuation of that of the prophet : thus Isidore de Eccl. Off. ii. n (Hittorp. 
 p. 23) writes : ' lectorum ordo formam et initium a prophetis accepit.' These words 
 are repeated by Rabanus Maurus de hist. Cler. i. 1 1 (p. 317) and by (pseudo) Albinus 
 Flaccus de Div. Off. (p. 70). Amalarius de Eccl. Off. ii. 8 (p. 163) regards the office 
 as a continuation of another charisma : ' hoc ministerium continetur in dono gratiae 
 Dei de quo dicit apostolus : alii sermo scientiae secundum eundem Spiritum." In 
 the Church Ordinances (c. 17) the reader ranks above the deacons and is said to 
 ' work the place of an evangelist.' The so-called second Epistle of Clement seems to 
 be the homily of a reader ; cf. also the reff. to ' reading ' in the N. T. i Tim. iv. 13 
 and Apoc. i. 3, and on the whole subject, see Harnack I.e. p. 57. Such readers held 
 of course an office of great importance when illiterate bishops were contemplated 
 (Apost. Const, ii. i, Ch. Ordin. 16).
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 261 
 
 their successors. This then is the last time that we 
 are presented with the apostolic ministry exercised 
 by men who are called prophets. If we ask the 
 question, how these prophets were appointed to 
 their ministry, we cannot obtain a very definite 
 answer. We do not know exactly what rights were 
 understood to belong to those who had these 
 miraculous gifts as pledges of divine favour and 
 mission, but the evidence of the Acts as to the 
 laying-on of hands, which gave, or confirmed, the 
 mission even of St. Paul and St. Barnabas, will not 
 allow us to suppose that the inspiration of these 
 later prophets would have enabled them to dispense 
 with ecclesiastical ordination by apostles or apostolic 
 men. It is however evident enough in the Didache 
 that there was a considerable admixture of self- 
 seeking impostors in the ranks of these later apostles 
 and prophets, and it is very easy to see that the 
 system of an unlocalized prophetic ministry was not 
 one which could have been safely allowed to become 
 permanent in the Churches. 1 As it is, we have 
 evidence such as cannot be resisted that the transi- 
 tion to the localized episcopate was effected by no 
 less an authority than that of apostles. 
 
 Ill 
 
 At the time when the prophets and teachers of ni. St. John 
 
 1 r . institutes 
 
 whom the Didache speaks were going on their the diocesan 
 
 episcopate, 
 
 1 The same suggestion of spiritual expediency would have promoted the transition 
 from the state of things which we find in the Didache to that which we find in 
 Ignatius' letters, which in a later age led to the drawing tight of diocesan restric- 
 tions : see above p. 150 n. 1 on the wandering bishops from Ireland and elsewhere. 
 This wandering ministry gave every opportunity for imposture, and we ought not 
 perhaps to be surprised to find a similar danger and similar abuses in the subapostolic 
 age. As to the bearing of such dangerous periods on the security of the apostolic 
 succession, enough perhaps was said in the second chapter.
 
 262 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 journeys from Church to Church, St. John was living 
 at Ephesus ; and Polycrates, who was bishop there 
 within the second century, speaks of him ' who lay 
 upon the Lord's breast ' as having become ' a priest, 
 wearing the mitre, and witness and teacher ' before 
 he fell asleep in Ephesus. 1 What then was the 
 nature of St. John's activity during this last period 
 of his life ? A tradition which cannot be set aside 
 connects with his name not only the writing of the 
 fourth Gospel but also the establishment of epi- 
 scopacy in its later sense. ' Listen,' says Clement of 
 Alexandria, ' to a legend, which is no legend but 
 very history, which has been handed down and 
 preserved about John the Apostle. When on the 
 death of the tyrant he returned from the isle of 
 Patmos to Ephesus, he used to go away when he 
 was summoned to the neighbouring districts as well, 
 in some places to establish bishops, in others to 
 organize whole Churches, in others to ordain to the 
 clergy some one of those indicated by the Spirit.' z 
 The reference here is to bishops in the later sense : 
 and Clement means that St. John ordained one 
 bishop in each place, for the history which he goes 
 on to narrate turns on the conduct of one of those 
 appointed bishops who 'presided over' a certain 
 city, which St. John visited once and again on 
 occasions of necessity. 3 Here then we have St. 
 
 1 ap. Euseb. H.E. iii. 31 : eyei/tjflrj tepev? TreVoXoy Trt^opeicto; Kai /uapTus at 
 SuSaVxaAos. 
 
 z Quis Dives 42. These last words vividly recall the apostolic age, cf. i Tim. i. 
 18, Acts xiii. 2. They ' seem to convince us that St. Clement reproduces the usage 
 [of St. John's age] faithfully ' (Simcox Early Ch. Hist. p. 183). See Lightfoot 
 Ignatius i. 380 on Clement's special means of knowledge through his ' Ionian ' 
 teacher. 
 
 3 Clement calls him also 6 Trpecr/Uv'Tepot, but perhaps in its natural sense, as he calls 
 him 6 irpe<r/3un)s later on. However, we have seen already that the word rrpea- 
 /3vTpowas used to include bishops by Clement and Irenaeus and later writers.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age, 263 
 
 John organizing episcopacy in the district about 
 Ephesus. This testimony is confirmed by Tertullian : 
 'We have,' he says, 'the Churches who have John 
 for their teacher. For the series of bishops (of the 
 Churches of Asia) if taken back to its origin will 
 rest upon his authorization.' x So, earlier than 
 Tertullian, the author of the Muratorian fragment 
 speaks of St. John as urged to write his Gospel 
 by ' his fellow-disciples and bishops.' Once again 
 Irenaeus, who represented all the traditions of Asia, 
 who had been Polycarp's disciple ' in his first youth ' 
 and kept up so vivid a memory of those early days, 
 tells us that his master ' was not only made a disciple 
 by apostles and held converse with many who had 
 seen Christ, but was also established in Asia by 
 apostles as bishop in the Church of Smyrna.' 2 In 
 the term ' apostles ' Irenaeus certainly means to 
 include St. John. Here is then a great body 
 of testimony connecting the episcopacy of the 
 Churches of Asia with St. John. It suggests 
 strongly that St. John regarded it as his apostolic 
 function to perpetuate a church ministry. 
 
 And in this last period of the apostolic ministry with other 
 we must not isolate St. John. Irenaeus, as noticed Apostiel* 
 above, speaks of Polycarp as instituted by apostles. 
 Ignatius speaks of episcopacy as the ordinance of 
 the Apostles. ' When,' Dr. Lightfoot says, ' after the 
 destruction of Jerusalem St. John fixed his abode 
 at Ephesus, it would appear that not a few of the 
 oldest surviving members of the Palestinian Church 
 
 1 adv. Marc. iv. 5. Later however the Asiatic Church received Timothy as the 
 first bishop of Ephesus, i.e. they carried back the succession behind Jojin. See Labbe 
 Collect. Condi, iv. p. 1620. 
 
 2 Euseb. H.E. iv. 14, cf. Tertull. de Praescr. 32 : ' Smyrnaeorum ecclesia Poly- 
 carpum ab loanne collocatum refert.'
 
 264 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 accompanied him into ' Asia,' which henceforward 
 became the headquarters of apostolic authority. In 
 this body of emigrants Andrew and Philip among 
 the twelve, 1 Aristion and John the presbyter among 
 other personal disciples of the Lord, are specially 
 mentioned.' ' A lifelong friendship would naturally 
 draw Philip the Apostle of Bethsaida after John, as 
 it also drew Andrew. And, when we turn to St. 
 John's Gospel, we can hardly resist the impression 
 that incidents relative to Andrew and Philip had a 
 special interest, not only for the writer of the Gospel, 
 but also for his hearers. Moreover the Apostles 
 Andrew and Philip appear in this Gospel as in- 
 separable companions.' 2 There is then reason to 
 connect the establishment of the Asiatic episcopacy 
 with the combined action of several of the Apostles. 
 Ignatius' Even, however, if we had not such direct testimony 
 testimony. as j^g j ust Deen recorded to this organization of 
 episcopacy by the Apostles who survived the de- 
 struction of Jerusalem, 3 the claim which Ignatius 
 makes for episcopacy in the beginning of the second 
 century would force us to postulate it. In passing 
 to the consideration of the evidence which his letters 
 afford for the history of the ministry, we cannot but 
 congratulate ourselves that now for the third time in 
 the history of literary controversy their genuineness 
 
 1 Andrew is mentioned among the ' condiscipuli ' of St. John who urged him to 
 write his Gospel in the Canon Mu.ra.tor. Philip, one of the twelve, is mentioned by 
 Polycrates ap. Euseb. H.E. iii. 31 : ' Philip . . . who sleeps in Hierapolis, and his two 
 daughters, having grown old in virginity, and his other daughter, having lived 
 (jroA.iTu<ra./iVr)) in the Holy Ghost, sleeps in Ephesus.' Dr. Lightfoot's argument 
 that this Philip was really the Apostle and not the evangelist (Colossians p. 45 note) 
 is convincing. 
 
 2 Colossians p. 45 and n. 3 
 
 3 It may well be considered that up to the time of the destruction of Jerusalem 
 that 'end of the age' for the Jewish Church all ecclesiastical arrangements had 
 a provisional character.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 265 
 
 has been vindicated by an English scholar. It is 
 perhaps hardly too much to say that Dr. Lightfoot 
 has now at last brought the controversy to an end. 1 
 
 1 Since the revival of learning, when scholars first began to perceive that the 
 mediaeval ' Ignatian letters ' were not the same as those quoted by the Fathers, 
 down to the present time, the writings of Ignatius have been a field for controversy 
 constantly renewed. The decision of the controversy, at least for the time, has (as 
 was said) thrice been due to English scholars. First in 1644 the critical insight and 
 genius of Ussher led to the recovery, though only in Latin, of the seven shorter 
 letters in the form now recognised as genuine, and banished for ever their mediaeval 
 interpolated or spurious representatives. Next, when after the appearance of the 
 Geeek text (in the main) in 1646 the presbyterians, especially the French presbyterians, 
 represented by Daill (1666), were alarmed at the witness of the letters of Ignatius 
 in favour of the cause of episcopacy and did their best to prove them spurious, the 
 great Bishop Pearson wrote his Vindiciae Igna.tia.nae (1672) ' incomparably,' Dr. 
 Lightfoot says (Ignatius i. p. 320), ' the most valuable contribution to the subject 
 which had hitherto appeared, with the single exception of Ussher 's work,' and on the 
 main issue seemed almost to have put the question at rest for those open to convic- 
 tion. But once again, after an interval of more than two centuries, Cureton's 
 publication in 1845 of some Syriac abridgements of some of the letters or extracts 
 from them (as we may now pronounce them to be), which he maintained to be the 
 only original letters, stirred the embers of the old discussion, and the question was 
 again rife which version, if any, represented the real Ignatius ; and now once more 
 the vindication of the genuineness of the ' shorter Greek ' letters has fallen to an 
 English scholar, Dr. Lightfoot, the prince we may be proud to call him of recent 
 historical critics in the department of church history. Dr. Lightfoot does not indeed 
 stand alone in his work of renewed vindication. Zahn's Ignatius von Antiochien, 
 which appeared in 1873, is described by Dr. Lightfoot himself (/.c. p. 272)35 'quite 
 the most important contribution to the solution of the Ignatian question which has 
 appeared since Cureton's discovery," and as having ' dealt a fatal blow at the claims 
 of the Curetonian letters.' But the chief merit rests with the English scholar. Dr. 
 Harnack speaks of his work as ' the most learned and careful (sorgfaltigste) patristic 
 monograph of the century,' and is in common with almost all scholars convinced by 
 the array of historical, linguistic, and general evidence on behalf of the letters which 
 has been produced. He speaks of their genuineness as 'certain,' and of the ' inner 
 grounds for it ' as ' overpowering ' (Expositor, Jan. 1886, pp. 10, 15). 
 
 Harnack however, while accepting Dr. Lightfoot's conclusion that Ignatius, 
 bishop of Antioch, was the author of these letters, disputed the position that Ignatius 
 wrote these letters and suffered martyrdom in the time of Trajan. He would bring 
 the letters down from A.D. 110-118 to some date probably after A.D. 130. The earlier 
 date he speaks of as a ' mere possibility, which is highly improbable, because it is 
 not supported by any word in the Epistles, and because it rests only upon a late and 
 very problematic witness ' (Expositor, March 1886, p. 190). As regards however (i) 
 the internal witness to date, Dr. Lightfoot has certainly the advantage over Harnack 
 in the discussion of the nature of the heresy which Ignatius is opposing. In the 
 Epistles to the Ephesians, Trallians, and Smyrnaeans, a docetic heresy is in question, 
 in the Epistle to the Philadelphians, a Judaistic. But in the Epistle to the Magnesians, 
 at least, we learn that these do no{ represent separate and distinct tendencies. The 
 heresy there in question is Judaeo-docetic a type of heresy which recalls that with 
 which St. Paul contended at Colossae and Ephesus. And throughout the Epistles 
 the same general terms are used in speaking of either heretical tendency. There are
 
 266 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Ignatius, bishop of Antioch, appears as a condemned 
 prisoner moving by a route through Asia to his death 
 at Rome, in the custody of a maniple of ten soldiers, 
 whom for their harshness he calls 'ten leopards.' 1 
 But his progress is converted into a sort of triumph. 
 The Churches hear where he can be seen, and at 
 Smyrna deputations arrive from Ephesus, Magnesia, 
 and Tralles and join the flock of Polycarp in doing 
 him honour. While he is at Smyrna he writes four 
 of the extant letters to the Ephesians, to the Mag- 
 nesians, to the Trallians, and to the Romans. The 
 other three were written from Troas, whither an 
 Ephesian deacon had accompanied him, and were 
 addressed to Churches through which he had just 
 passed, to Philadelphia and Smyrna, and to Smyrna's 
 bishop, Polycarp. He passes from Neapolis to 
 Philippi, where he is again welcomed by the Church 
 and escorted on his way, and so he goes on towards 
 Rome and we lose sight of him. 2 Here then we 
 Hisquaiifi- have a very notable witness. He is a man who, 
 cations as a t nou gh he loves to describe himself as 'only now 
 beginning to be a disciple,' is probably old in years. 3 
 
 no signs of two movements which Ignatius was resisting. Harnack admits that 
 Lightfoot ' can appeal on behalf of [his position] to the consensus of most scholars of 
 modern times. 1 But this Judaeo-docetic heresy points strongly to the earlier date. 
 See Lightfoot i. pp. 361-3 ; Harnack I.e. pp. 175-185. As regards (2) the external 
 evidence, Harnack quite underrates the force of Origen's testimony to the early date. 
 Origen quotes and mentions Ignatius the martyr as ' second bishop of Antioch after 
 the blessed Peter, who fought with beasts in the persecution at Rome ' (in Luc. vi). 
 This must refer (see Lightfoot ii. p. 470) to the persecution under Trajan. On the 
 whole we may accept the connection of Ignatius' martyrdom with Trajan's reign with 
 great confidence. And Harnack himself now substantially admits this. See his 
 Chronologic (Leipzig, 1897), p. 406. ' Die Ignatiusbriefe und der Polycarpbrief sind 
 echt, und sie sind in den letzten Jahren Trajans verfasst (109-117) oder vielleicht einige 
 Jahre spater (117-125).' 
 
 1 ad Rom. 5 : Sexo. AeoTrapSots, o eon <TTpa.nuni.Kov Tayncf 01 cal tvepytrovfj.evoi 
 Xeipov? yivovrau.' 2 Lightfoot i. pp. 34-37. 
 
 3 He writes to Polycarp ' in language which is most appropriate on the lips of an 
 old man speaking to one who is many years his junior ' (Lightfoot i. p. 425). Now 
 Polycarp, if he bad received his appointment in the Church of Smyrna, as Irenaeus 
 
 witness.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 267 
 
 He would have been a boy at least when St. Paul 
 wrote his great Epistles ; he would have been in full 
 manhood when the last days came upon Jerusalem. 
 If the traditions of his relation to St. John cannot 
 be depended upon, at any rate we must admit that 
 he can bear unexceptionable testimony to apostolic 
 intentions, and, unlike some of the subapostolic 
 witnesses, he is one who, whatever age he had be- 
 longed to, would have been remarkable for his 
 character and powers. The doctrinal and ecclesi- 
 astical interest of his letters has sometimes led to 
 the moral beauty and power which they exhibit being 
 overlooked. They reveal a man on fire with love, 
 filled with the Spirit, one whom it would be absurd 
 to call a literalist, a formalist, or a mere lover of 
 organization. In spite of his Italian name, he is a 
 thorough oriental, with a mystical, meditative spirit, 
 who sees things according to their inner forces and 
 hidden powers witness his sayings of intense con- 
 viction about the silent workings of God 1 and of 
 holiness, his spiritual conception of Christianity and 
 of the eucharistic gifts, 2 his perception of the sanctity 
 of common life. 3 Again he is beyond question the 
 greatest theologian among the ' apostolic fathers,' 
 with his deep insight into the Incarnation as a 
 principle, a fact, a doctrine, and with his power to 
 hold in balance its great antithesis in all its applica- 
 tions the antithesis of the spiritual and the material, 
 of the Word made flesh. 4 
 
 says, from apostles, must, even if ordained at thirty, have been well on in life in 
 
 A.D. 110. 
 
 1 SetadEfk. 6, 15, 19, ad Philad. i, ad Mag*. 8, ad Trail. 4. 
 
 2 Whatever external conditions church unity requires, its essence is an inward 
 fact. God Himself is the inner principle of union ; ad Troll, n, ad Magn. 15. 
 For the eucharistic gifts, see ad Eph. 20, cf. i and 5, ad Troll. 8, ad Rout. 7. 
 
 3 ad Eph. 8 : a yap Kara crapica irpewrorre, ravra jrvev/taTuca onr. 
 
 * Cf. his constant balancing of o-opcucwt and jrvtvjtoTuci?, ad Eph. 10, ad Magn. 
 i, 13, ad Trail. 12, ad Smyrn. i, 12, ad Poly c. 2 ; cf. Lightfoot ii. p. 48.
 
 268 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 This man then is on his way to death. Time is 
 passing away from him, and he has but few moments 
 in which to give as his last message to the Churches, 
 what he thinks of most urgent importance for them 
 in view of that age of restless speculation and wild 
 imaginative idealism, the solvent forces of which they 
 were just beginning to feel. Under these circum- 
 stances he applies himself to strengthening two great 
 fortresses of the Church's life. The first is the 
 Incarnation as a fact in history, as a thing sacra- 
 mentally perpetuated, as a principle to be meditated 
 upon, formulated, and fought for. 1 The second is 
 the Ministry the visible organization of bishops, 
 presbyters, and deacons, by which the Church, the 
 home of God's redemption, is to be known, and by 
 which it is made plain that the Christian religion 
 is not a dream or a speculation but a manifested life, 
 social, organized, and disciplined, under the authority 
 of a divinely-given rule. 
 
 The claim he In his assertion of the prerogative of the threefold 
 threefofd rthe ministry Ignatius is almost violently emphatic, as 
 ministry. ma y. fo e seen f rom th e following passages from his 
 
 letters 2 : 
 
 ' It is meet therefore . . . that being perfectly joined together in 
 one submission, submitting yourselves to your bishop and presbytery, 
 ye may be sanctified in all things.' 
 
 ' I was forward to exhort you, that ye run in harmony with the mind 
 of God : for Jesus Christ also, our inseparable life, is the mind of the 
 Father, even as the bishops that are settled in the farthest parts of the 
 earth are in the mind of Jesus Christ. So then it becometh you to run 
 in harmony with the mind of the bishop ; which thing also ye do. For 
 
 1 The emphasis upon the physical fact of Christ's incarnation, birth, death, 
 resurrection, as against Docetism, is of course constant (ad Magn. n, ad Trail. 9, 
 ad Smyrn. i) ; see Lightfoot i. pp. 359, 360. For the close connection of the Incar- 
 nation with the Eucharist, see ad Smyrn. 7. For Ignatius' tendency to formulate 
 the antithesis it involves as a doctrine, see ad Eph. 7, ad Polyc. 3, cf. ad Eph. 20. 
 
 2 From Dr. Lightfoot's translation.
 
 VI.] TJie Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 269 
 
 your honourable presbytery, which is worthy of God, is attuned to the 
 bishop, even as its strings to a lyre.' 
 
 1 Let no man be deceived. If any one be not within the precinct of 
 the altar, he lacketh the bread [of God]. For, if the prayer of one and 
 another hath so great force, how much more that of the bishop and of 
 the whole Church. . . . Let us therefore be careful not to resist the 
 bishop, that by our submission we may give ourselves to God. And 
 in proportion as a man seeth that his bishop is silent, let him fear him 
 the more. For every one whom the Master of the household sendeth 
 to be steward over His own house, we ought so to receive as Him that 
 sent him. Plainly therefore we ought to regard the bishop as the Lord 
 Himself.' 
 
 ' Assemble yourselves together in common, every one of you severally, 
 man by man, in grace, in one faith and one Jesus Christ, who after the 
 flesh was of David's race, who is Son of Man and Son of God, to the 
 end that ye may obey the bishop and the presbytery without distraction 
 of mind ; breaking one bread, which is the medicine of immortality 
 and the antidote that we should not die." * 
 
 ' Forasmuch then as I was permitted to see you in the person of your 
 godly bishop Damas, and your worthy presbyters Bassus and Apollonius 
 and my fellow-servant the deacon Sotion, of whom I would fain have 
 joy, for that he is subject to the bishop as unto the grace of God and 
 to the presbytery as unto the law of Jesus Christ : Yea, and it be- 
 cometh you also not to presume upon the youth of your bishop, but 
 according to the power of God the Father to render unto him all 
 reverence, . . . yet not to him, but to the Father of Jesus Christ, even 
 to the Bishop of all. . . . For a man does not so much deceive this 
 bishop who is seen, as cheat that other who is invisible." 
 
 1 ad Eph. 2 : vpfirov ovv foriv Kara, iravra TOOWOV iofcujeu' 'Ii)<rovv Xpiorbi' TOV 
 &oa.o-avra ti/xas, iva fv /ica vjrorayjj eaT7)pTiovieVoi, vtroratro-ofifvoi. TW cjricxoirtp icai 
 ri> irpeo~/3vTep:ci>, Kara iraWa )Te iiyiiuritfvoi. 
 
 3, 4 : wpof \aftov irapaKaAcif v/xos, OITOJS trvvrpfxtre rg yvu/iij TOV fleou- icat yap 
 'I. X., TO a.&ia.KpiTov THiiav Vj>', TOV irarpb? rj yvufit), (os cat 01 iiritTKOttoi 01 Kara. 
 TO ire'paTa 6prfleVres tv 'I. X. -yi'aj/ijj flciv. *O3ev irpe'jrei vft.lv avvrpexfiv rfj TOV 
 e7Ti<Tico;rov yvtaufi, Sirep Kai iroieiTe. TO yap afiovo/iaorov v/juai> irpfirftvTfpiov, TOV 
 fleou <iiov, ovTias avvrjpnoirrai Tta eiriaicoirci) 015 ^opoai. KiBdpa. 
 
 5, 6 i fiTjieis w\a.vd,<r6<i)' iav pri Tty jj fvrot TOV Ovaiairrripiov vtrrepftTai. TOV 
 dpTOV [TOU 0fov], fl yap tvbs cai SrvTepov irpo<revx'I TOo~avTi)v ler^vv x' l > nowp 
 jiaAAoi' rj Tf TOV firiiTKOirav Kal iraorjs Trjs ticicAijo'iai . . . oTrouSowrw/iei' ovv ftrj 
 ajTtT<io"<reo^ai TCO fTn<ric6ma, iva !a/j.ev Beta viroTaa<r6p.evoi. Kal o<rov p.WTret Ttj 
 <ny<avra tirivKOirov, irAeidfuf avTOv <j>o^e((rB<a' iravra yap 8f ire'/iirei 6 oi*co8eoT7OTi)s 
 el? ISiav OLKOVOiiia.v, ouTut Sfl TJ/JLOL^ avrbv Se'^eo^ai us avrov TOV vffiifiavTa' TOV ovv 
 firi<TKOirov STjAovoTi ws ouTOi' TOV Kvpiov Ofl Trpoo'^AcVeii'. 
 
 20 : oi (caT* avSpa Koiirfi irdvres tv \apni. t bvofiaTos ovvepxf<r8f tv |ii^ irt'oTci 
 itai tv 'I. X. TOI KaTa adpKa. e yfvovs Ao^i'5, ry vita avOptunov Kal vita Oeov, ei? TO 
 vnoKOveiv ufias TCO Jrto~<co'7r<j) icac Tta trpeo"/3uTept'o> airepienroo~nj> Siai'onf fva aprov 
 eo-Ttf <ap/uaxoi/ adavao-ias, aiTiooTOS ToC fxJ) airctfaitlv'
 
 270 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 ' It is therefore meet that we not only be called Christians, but also 
 be such ; even as some persons have the bishop's name on their lips, 
 but in everything act apart from him. Such men appear to me not to 
 keep a good conscience, forasmuch as they do not assemble themselves 
 together lawfully according to commandment.' 
 
 ' Be ye zealous to do all things in godly concord, the bishop presiding 
 after the likeness of God and the presbyters after the likeness of the 
 council of the Apostles, with the deacons also who are most dear to 
 me, having been entrusted with the diaconate of Jesus Christ. ' 
 
 ' As the Lord did nothing without the Father, [being united with 
 Him] either by Himself or by the Apostles, so neither do ye anything 
 without the bishop and the presbyters. And attempt not to think 
 anything right for yourselves apart from others ; but let there be one 
 prayer in common, etc.' 
 
 ' Do your diligence therefore that ye be confirmed in the ordinances 
 of the Lord and of the Apostles, that ye may prosper in all things 
 whatsoever ye do in flesh and spirit ... in the Son and Father and in 
 the Spirit, . . . with your revered bishop, and with the fitly wreathed 
 spiritual circlet of your presbytery, and with the deacons who walk 
 after God. Be obedient to the bishop and to one another, as Jesus 
 Christ was to the Father [according to the flesh], and as the Apostles 
 were to Christ and to the Father, that there may be union both of flesh 
 and of spirit. ' 1 
 
 1 ad Magn. 2, 3 : 'Eire! ovv ti^iuiO^v ISelv vfj.as Sia. Aajia TOU aftofleou v/awi/ 
 eirtcrKOJrov (cat irpecr/3uTp<oi' aitov Bd<7<roi; (cat "An-oAAwciou at TOU <rvvSov\ov jaou 
 <5oa*:o'i'oi> /(oTioji'os, o5 eya) bva.iit.fiv, on UTTOTacro-eTat T<a emo~Koma 109 \apiTi Oeov 
 (cat Tia Trpecr/SuTepi'w ws voV<? 'I. X. Kat vjj.lv oe irpeirei. /urj <rvyxpa.(r6ai TJJ ^AiKt'a 
 TOU e7rtcr(co'7rou, aAAa KO.TO. ovva.ft.iv 6eov jrarpbs ira.o~a.v evTpoinjv avrtf airovefieiv, 
 K a.0o)5 fyviov (cat TOUI dytous Trpeo-jSuTe'povs ov irpo<rei\T)<f)6Ta.s -rr\v $a<.voju.e'i/i)i> 
 vftarfpiKTjv Taiv, oAA' <os ^>povi/ji.<f ev flea) <rvyx<apovma.s avria' OVK avrip Se, aAAa 
 T<U Trarpt I. X. TCU Tracrwp 7rto"/cO7T(o. . . . errei ov^ 6Vt TOV etria'Koirov TOVTOV TOV 
 /SAen-oVei'Oi' ir\av$ Tts, aAAa TOV aoparov wapaAoyi^cTat. 
 
 4 : npe'irov 05^ early jitr) fiovov icaAeio-flai XpioTiavoiis aAAa (cat elvar Sxnrep 
 (cat rives eiritTKOirov JHCP KoAoucriv, X a> P t! ^^ avroO irdvTa. Trpacro'oucrii'' ot ToioOrot fie 
 OVK euoT/cet'SjjTOt /ixot etfat (jtaivovrai. fita TO fj.T) /3f/3at'io; icar' ei/ToAijv cruraflpotfccrflai. 
 
 6 : ev ofjiovoiif Ofov <rrrovSdeTe TTO.VTO. Trpaacreiv, TrpOKa.6riiJ.fvov TOV CTricrKOTrou 
 ets TVTTQV Oeov (cat TWV rrpeo~j3uTpwi/ ets TVTTOV o~vve&piov Tiav a.noo~Td\tav, (cat TIV 
 oia.Koviav, Tiav ffiol y\vKVTa.Tiav ireiri.aTevft,eviav SiaKoviav "I. X. 
 
 7 :*Ocr7rep oJiv b Kvptos oivev TOV iraTpbs ovSev eiroir)o~ev [^vw^tcVos iav] OVTS Si' 
 eavTOV OVTS Sia Tiav aTroo^ToAuH'' OVTUS fir)Se v^iety avfv TOV eirtcrKOTrou (cat TWI/ 
 Trpfir^VTepiav fxr)Sei/ 7rpacrcr6T6, ju.i)5e TreipacnjTe fv\oydv TI ^aiVccrflat t6ta v/xiv aAA" 
 inl TO OUTO juta Trpoaevxr) K.T.A. 
 
 13 : SwovSajJere ovv ^e^atudrji/at ev Toty Soyfiao-iv TOV Kvpiov (cat Tiav aTrooTo'Awv, 
 iVa iravra. bVa jroietT* (caTeuoSojfl^Te o~apict (cai. nvfVjj.a.Ti, irio~Tei (cat ayaTrjj, ev vl<a 
 (cat iraTpt KOI ev irvev/iari, ev apxj? (cat ei Te'Aet, ftTa TOU afiOTrpeireo-ToYou 
 eTTiff/coTrou viJ,u>v (cat <xioirAo(cou wveuftaTKCov trre^avov TOV Trpecr/SvTept'ou i/xuu' (cat 
 TU>V (caTa flebj* Staxoi'oji'. v7rOTayi]Te TW eirtcTKCiTrm (cat aAA^Aots, os I. X. TU Trarpt 
 [(caTa crapxa] (cat ot OTrooroAoi TW X. (cat TU irarpi, ifa eVwo*ts J7 o~ap*ct(c^ Te (Cat
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 27 1 
 
 ' When ye are obedient to the bishop as to Jesus Christ, it is evident 
 to me that ye are living not after men but after Jesus Christ. ... It 
 is therefore necessary, even as your wont is, that ye should do nothing 
 without the bishop ; but be ye obedient also to the presbytery, as to 
 the Apostles. . . . And those likewise who are deacons of the 
 mysteries of Jesus Christ must please all men in all ways. For they 
 are not deacons of meats and drinks but servants of the Church of 
 God. It is right therefore that they should beware of blame as of 
 fire. In like manner let all men respect the deacons as Jesus Christ, 
 even as they should respect the bishop as being a type of the Father 
 and the presbyters as the council of God and as the college of 
 apostles. Apart from these there is not even the name of a Church.' 
 
 ' This will surely be, if ye be not puffed up and if ye be inseparable 
 from [God] Jesus Christ, and from the bishop and from the ordinances 
 of the Apostles. He that is within the sanctuary is clean ; but he that 
 is without the sanctuary is not clean, that is, he that doeth aught 
 without the bishop and presbytery and deacons, this man is not clean 
 in his conscience.' 
 
 ' Fare ye well in Jesus Christ, submitting yourselves to the bishop as 
 to the commandment, and likewise also to the presbytery.' l 
 
 ' For as many as are of God and of Jesus Christ, they are with 
 the bishop ; and as many as shall repent and enter into the unity of 
 the Church, these also shall be of God. ... Be not deceived, 
 my brethren, if any man followeth one that maketh a schism, he 
 doth not inherit the kingdom of God. If any man walketh in 
 strange doctrine, he hath no fellowship with the passion. Be ye 
 careful therefore to observe one eucharist, for there is one flesh of 
 our Lord Jesus Christ and one cup unto union in His blood ; there 
 is one altar, as there is one bishop, together with the presbytery and 
 the deacons my fellow-servants.' 2 
 
 1 ad Trail. 2, 3 : "Orav yip r<Z eVioxoVto v7rordVoT)O'fle <J>s "I. X., <f>aiveo~9e jtoe ou 
 Kara avBpuTrov; ^ivrej, dAAa Kara. 'I. X. ... avayKalov ovv eo-TiV, Oia-rrep iroteiTt, 
 aVev TOU fc7rio"K6;rou prjoev irpao~o'iv v/tas* aAA' uffOTao*o*eo~0e /cat T<O Trp<rf$VTfpitp t w? 
 [rot?] aTrooToAois 'I. X. ... Set fie cai TOUS Siaxovovs ovras iivo~rr\pi<av 'I. X. Kara 
 travra. rpoftov Tratriv apfiTKfiv ou yap /SpwjuaTioi' Kal iroTiav fio~lv SiaKovoi, aAA.' 
 
 "Ouoi'a>s rravres ei/Tpe7re'o~$u)0"ai> TOUS fitajcopou? ws 'I. X. ws Kal rov firiffKonov ovra. 
 rvirov TOV iraTpds, TOUS fie jrpeo~/3uTe'pous ws a-vveSpiov Oeov Kal <ij o'vVo'eovioi' airoaToAwv- 
 
 Xbjptf TOUTWI' GKK\.TJO~ia. OU KaAdTat. 
 
 7 : TOUTO Se ecrrai ufiic fiij (j>vo~iou/u.cVoit Kal ov&t.v a^wpioTois [Ceou] "I. X. ai TOU 
 firi.o'Koirov Kal riav oi.arayfia.Tiav riav airoo-To\<av. 6 eirbs fluo~ia<m;piou >v icaflopos 
 ecrrt^, 6 6e eKToy TOV #u(7ia<m7piou tav ou Kaflapos tmv' TOUTo*rtv, o XU>PL? ewto**co7rou 
 icai irpeo"^uTept'ov Kal &IOKOVOV TTpao~<r<av n, OUTOS ou (caflapo's i&rlv Tfj ovvtt&qo'ti. 
 
 13 : eppiufffle fv "I. X., VTTOTaao'oii.fvoi. TOI fVUTKOirtf <os rfi evroAjJ, o/xoito? <cai r<a 
 
 2 ad Philad. 3, 4: 00-01 yap Oeov f'urlv Kai'I. X. OUTOI fieTa TOU tn-io-KoVou eio-iv
 
 272 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 ' Shun divisions, as the beginning of evils. Do ye all follow your 
 bishop, as Jesus Christ followed the Father, and the presbytery as the 
 Apostles ; and to the deacons pay respect, as to God's commandment. 
 Let no man do aught of things pertaining to the Church apart from 
 the bishop. Let that be held a valid eucharist which is under the 
 bishop or one to whom he shall have committed it. Wheresoever 
 the bishop shall appear, there let the people be ; even as where 
 Jesus may be, there is the universal Church. It is not lawful apart 
 from the bishop either to baptize or to hold a love-feast ; but what- 
 ever he shall approve, this is well-pleasing also to God ; that every- 
 thing which ye do may be sure and valid.' 
 
 ' It is good to recognise God and the bishop. He that honoureth 
 the bishop is honoured of God ; he that doeth aught without the 
 knowledge of the bishop rendereth service to the devil.' 1 
 
 The ministry The following points in Ignatius' teaching about 
 
 the ministry require to be emphasized : 
 (i> of divine (i) He has an intensely clear perception that the 
 authority, < m ind o f God ' for man's salvation has expressed 
 itself not in any mere doctrine but in a divinely 
 instituted society with a divinely authorized hier- 
 archy. This is the ' mind of God,' this is ' the com- 
 mandment,' so clearly that he who would obey the 
 commandment and run in harmony with the divine 
 purpose must perforce have merged his individuality 
 in the fellowship of the Church and submitted his 
 wilfulness to her government. 
 
 (cat ocrot a.v fTai'Cjcra>'TS tA0ai<ni> tTri T^P ei'onjTO. rijs e/c<cAi]cn'as, (cat OVTOI fleoC 
 f<TOVT<u. . . . JUT) jrAacacrfle, aSeA^ot'nof' et Tts ar^ovTi. aKoAovflet jSacriAetW Oeov oil 
 (cAi)poi/o/uiei' el TIS ey aAAorpt'a yvia^rj TreptTraret, euros TW jrdflet ou crvy(caTaTi(?eTai. 
 SirouSdo-are o$v pit} evxapto-Tt'ct xp^^ al -' M' a y^P 0"ap{ To " Kvpiou im.S>v 'I. X., ical ev 
 TTOTrjpioi' els evuinv TOU atjoiaTos airoi;' fv fluataaTiiptoy, <o? eis eTTitTKOiros, ana TO> 
 7rpe(rj3i)T6pi(}) (cat cita/coveus, rots crwSouAots /aot. 
 
 1 ad Smyrn. 8 : TOUS e fxcpicryaov? (j>evyeTf, (is apxV ica(c<oi>. TrdfTes rta ejrtcr(cdn-a) 
 a.KoX.ovOeiTf, <<)$ 'I. X. TtS irarpi, (cat TO> irpecr^UTcpt'to (us TOIS ano<rT6\oi.s. TOVS Se 
 StaKorov? ei/TpeTTecrOe, cos 9cov VTO\TIV. jLtr/Sets X^^P^ To ^ CTIC/KOTTOV Ti TrpacrcreTO) Ttav 
 avriKovrw ets rrji' fKK\T)<riav. exct'ia) fiepaia. eu^aptcrrta TjytivBia ^ virb TOV eViVico7roi> 
 ovcra, f/tf av avrbs fmTpfifiy. OTTOU av <j>avfi o enicrKOTros, et TO irA-rj^os CCTTO- oicrTrep 
 OTTOV ai' ^ 'I. X., c(cet ^ (ca6oXtKT) e(C(cAi;cria. ov/c efdv tcrrii' X^P 15 T0 *' eTicrKorrou 
 oire ^aTTTtfetf ovre aydm/i/ Troierv aXA' o av eiceivos Soicifidcrr;, TOUTO (cat TW flcaT 
 eiidpeo'TOi', iva a<r<^aAes }5 (cat ^e'^aiov Tray o TrpdcrcreTe. 
 
 9 : jcaAws e^et flebf (cat firiffKOirov elSevai.- o Ti/j-tav firicrKOTTOV UTTO fleov TTt/u.r)Taf 
 6 Adflpa tTTio-KOTrou Tt jrpacrcrwv TW Sia^dAw Aarpeuci.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 273 
 
 (2) He regards the authoritative hierarchy of the (2) essenti- 
 
 ,,, i- 1 i .. ally three- 
 
 Church as essentially threefold a ministry of fold; 
 
 bishops, presbyters, and deacons. It is not merely, 
 as has been suggested, that he exhorts men to be, 
 or to be more decidedly, members of the church 
 organization which happens to have a ministry of 
 bishops, priests, and deacons. He insists polemically 
 that this particular form of ministry is essential to 
 the existence of a Church : ' without these three 
 orders' (so Dr. Lightfoot renders his words) 'no 
 Church has a title to the name.' l 
 
 (3) Ignatius' testimony presents us with the ' mon- (3)undis- 
 archical episcopate ' as ' firmly rooted,' ' completely 
 beyond dispute.' z We cannot doubt that he bases 
 
 its authority on the ' ordinances of the Apostles!* 
 
 (4) Besides regarding episcopacy as of the essence CO universal 
 of a Church and as of apostolic authority, he speaks church. 
 
 1 ad Trail, 3 \iopis rovnav eiucAi)<ria oir KoAeiTai, and see Lightfoot in loc. Cf. 
 also Zahn I gnat, von A ntioch. p. 300 : ' was obne die Trager des dreifachen Kirchen- 
 amtes ist, heisst nicht Kirche.' He however goes on : ' aber den Gegensatz bildet 
 nicht eine Gemeinde, welche dieser Institute oder eines derselben entbehrt, sondern 
 ein kirchliches Handeln, wie Abendmahlsfeier oder sonstige gottesdienstliche Ver- 
 sammlungen, welches ohne Wissen und Willen, ohne directe oder indirecte Leitung 
 des an der Spitze stehenden Bischofs und der ihm untergeordneten Presbyter und 
 Diaconen vor sich geht." Cf. Lightfoot L p. 382. It is quite true that Ignatius has 
 no ' presbyterian ' form of government in view, but it seems to me beyond fair ques- 
 tion that he insists upon episcopacy as the only church government, and would have 
 refused to recognise any other. 
 
 It must be noticed that Ignatius claims prophetic gifts and as a prophet has 
 received special communications on the subject of church order. He claims (ad 
 Philad. 7) to have spoken with the voice of God : ' It was the preaching of the 
 Spirit, who spake on this wise ; " do nothing without the bishop ; keep your flesh as 
 a temple of God ; cherish union ; shun divisions ; be imitators of Jesus Christ, as 
 He Himself also was of the Father."' 
 
 2 Harnack Expositor, Jan. 1886, p. 16. Lightfoot disposes of the notion that 
 veurepiKT) ra|is (ad Magn. 3) refers to the episcopate as a ' newly instituted 
 order.' 
 
 3 ad Trail. ^ '. ovaiv <xx<opt'<7TOis [<?eov] 'Ii)<rov <cai TOW eiriovcoirov <cai riav Sia.Ta.y- 
 liaTiav riav a.no<rTo\<av. ' The reference [of the last four words) is doubtless to 
 the institution of episcopacy ' (Lightfoot in loc). Cf. ad Trail. 12, where he orders 
 the Church and presbyters to comfort their bishop to the honour of the Father and 
 of Jesus Christ and of the Apostles. Kuhl has no grounds for his attempt to 
 mnke Ignatius struggle to promote a new ideal ; see Gemeindeord, pp. 132, 133.
 
 274 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 of it as co-extensive with the Church, that is, as 
 existing everywhere. He speaks of the bishops as 
 established in the farthest parts of the earth)- He 
 knows of no non-episcopal area. This of course is 
 evidence to which it will be necessary to pay atten- 
 tion when we come to consider the state of the 
 western Churches, especially that of Philippi, through 
 which he was to pass, and that of Rome, which he 
 addresses in such high praise as ' enlightened through 
 the will of Him who willed all things that are, . . . 
 in flesh and in spirit united unto His every command- 
 ment.' 2 
 
 (s)The (5) Lastly, it is of great importance to see what 
 
 ^presents answer Ignatius suggests to the question whether 
 archyof the monarchical episcopate came into existence by 
 elevation out of the presbyterate, or whether it in- 
 herited functions which had belonged hitherto only 
 to apostles and those who were fellow-workers with 
 apostles or who subsequently had shared their 
 authority. Now all the indications of Ignatius' 
 letters seem to assure us that the latter is the true 
 view. That is to say, the presbyters in the Church 
 of Asia, as in the Churches of Palestine and Syria, 
 never had held the office which Ignatius calls 
 episcopal. They had indeed borne the name (which 
 perhaps St. John's authority transferred to those 
 whom he put in chief charge of the Churches 3 ) but 
 
 1 ad Eph. 3 01 eiruricoTroi 01 Kara TO jre'paro opurdeiref ; cf. ad Rom. 6 TO. irepa.ro. 
 TOV Koo-fxov. ' Ignatius would be contemplating regions as distant as Gaul on the 
 one hand and Mesopotamia on the other ' (Lightfoot in loc). He ascribes equal 
 catholicity to the Church and to the episcopate. 
 
 2 ad Rom. inscr. ; see also c. 4, where he specially speaks of the Roman Church 
 as having received commandments from the Apostles Peter and Paul, and cf. 
 Lightfoot i. p. 357. 
 
 3 This transference of the title ' episcopus ' need not surprise us. It will be 
 noticed that St. Peter classes himself, though he is an apostle, among the presbyters 
 (i Peter v. i ; cf. Lightfoot Dissert, p. 198 on St. Paul's relation to the presbyterate
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 275 
 
 they had never held the office. The reasons for this 
 view are these. 
 
 Ignatius attributes to the bishops an authority 
 essentially monarchical. He does not speak of them 
 as succeeding to the Apostles, but he regards them 
 as representing Christ or the Father, while the 
 presbyters, the companions of the bishop, are like the 
 circle of the twelve round their Master. 1 Thus each 
 Church with its bishop and presbytery is like a little 
 theocracy, in which the bishop represents the 
 authority of God and is a fresh embodiment of that 
 divine presence which was in the world when Christ 
 moved about with His Apostles round Him. This 
 appears to have been a Jewish way of representing 
 the succession in the Church. We recall how Hege- 
 sippus spoke of James as ' receiving the Church in 
 succession with the Apostles,' implying that he and 
 
 at Corinth). Thus, when the ' vir apostolicus ' like Timothy was put in charge of a 
 Church, he doubtless became a presbyter among presbyters, though he was their 
 ruler, and would have been reckoned with them as holding the eiri<rjt<nnj. But, 
 where there was a distinction of office and power, a distinction of names was desir- 
 able, and it was most natural that the localized representative of apostolic authority, 
 like ' bishops ' James and Symeon, should have the title ' episcopus ' reserved to 
 him (while the title presbyter remained common to all who sat on the raised bench 
 of church rulers), for it is in itself much more applicable to a single president than 
 to the members of a college. (It is perhaps just worth notice that the term 
 en-icricoTnj is first used, though with reference to the Psalm, for the apostolic office in 
 Acts i. 20). The titles ' apostle,' ' evangelist,' ' teacher,' ' prophet,' were on the other 
 hand, for different reasons, not suitable to describe the chief pastors of a particular 
 Church. We have a parallel to this transference of a title from a lower to a higher 
 use in the history of the term imperator. So it may be noticed that the term 
 \eipOTOvia. passed upward from meaning election by the members of the Church 
 (Did. xv. i) as well as by the Apostles, (Acts xiv. 23) to meaning ordination, while 
 the phrases xeipoic eTrtflecris, xeipas eirtTifleVai, as represented by \tipodtrfiv, came 
 to have the lower meaning of benediction. Thus Apost. Const, viii. 28 : 6 trpeo-/3v- 
 
 1 The comparison of the presbyters to the Apostles is the regular comparison in 
 Ignatius. The comparisons for the bishop and deacons are more variable; see 
 Lightfoot on ad Trail. 3. The bishop represents indifferently Christ or the Father : 
 see ad Magn. 6, ad Trail. 2, 3, (cf. (3), ad Smyrn. 8. There are also vaguer phrases 
 according to which the bishop represents ' the grace of God,' and the presbyters ' the 
 law of Jesus Christ ' (ad Magn. 2). The deacons in a sense represent Christ as 
 ministering (ad Magn. 6, ad Trail. 3) ; cf. Lightfoot i. p. 382.
 
 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 the Apostles succeeded to Christ ; so those who were 
 
 of Christ's family were supposed to represent him in 
 
 Palestine as the King of the house of David ; so in 
 
 the Clementines the bishop ordained by Peter is 
 
 given not only the chair of the Apostle but also ' the 
 
 chair of Christ,' 1 and this way of conceiving the 
 
 succession appears later in the Apostolical Constitu- 
 
 Reiationof tions? Thus, if the presbyters by this comparison 
 
 apostolic 6 represent the Apostles, they represent them as they 
 
 succession. , , /-/.> r. . 
 
 were bejore Llinst s ascension, not after it as they 
 were when Christ was among them. After that each 
 one of the Apostles became in his turn a representa- 
 tive of Christ, and that in a sense which gave him an 
 authority far greater than Ignatius would dare to 
 claim for himself or any of his contemporaries. 3 In 
 a sense, then, the Apostles according to Ignatius 
 have no successors ; in a sense, again, the presbyters 
 in their relation to the bishop succeed to them in 
 
 1 Ep. Clem. 17, Horn. iii. 70 ; and twelve presbyters are instituted, i.e. the number 
 of the Apostles (Recog. iii. 66, vi. 15, xi. 36). 
 
 2 Apost. Const, ii. 26, 28 : ' Let the presbyters be esteemed by you to represent 
 us the Apostles ; let them be teachers of the knowledge of God, since our Lord also, 
 when He sent us, said : " Go ye, etc." ' ' Let a double portion be set apart for the 
 presbyters as for such as labour continually about the word of the doctrine in honour 
 of the Apostles of our Lord, whose place also they sustain as counsellors of the bishop 
 and the crown of the Church.' It will be remembered that in the Maronite office for 
 the ordination of bishops and in a passage of Ephraem Syrus the succession is traced 
 from God on Mount Sinai, through Moses and Aaron, to John the Baptist, and so 
 through Christ to His Apostles and the bishops. In each generation there have 
 been persons who (more or less) represented God and his authority. This is a some- 
 what Judaistic way of conceiving the succession. It comes from emphasizing authority 
 rather than grace ; Ignatius however cannot in general be accused of any Judaism in 
 his mode of representing Christ's relation to His Church. See esp. ad Rom. 3 : ' For 
 our God Jesus Christ, being in the Father, is the more plainly visible.' 
 
 It is to be noticed that Dr. Hatch in describing this theocratic conception of the 
 episcopal office says (B. L. p. 89) : ' Upon this theory of ecclesiastical organization 
 the existence of a president was a necessity ; and the theory seems to go back to the 
 very beginnings of the Christian societies." I do not know how this admission is 
 worked in with his general theory of the origin of church organization. 
 
 3 ad Rom. 4 : ovx <>>s Herpes (tai IlaCAos 6iaTa(T<7ojAai v\t."\.v ' e/ceii/oi. airdoToAoi, cyw 
 (caraitpiTos. Cf. ad Trail. 3, ad Philad. 5. See further, on this idea of succession 
 to Christ, Dr. Liddon in A Father in Christ [2nd ed.] p. xxv f.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age, 277 
 
 their relation to Christ when He was on earth ; but 
 in yet another sense the bishops alone succeed to that 
 office of representing Christ and speaking with the 
 authority of God which had been the special preroga- 
 tive of the Apostles. Thus, though the bishops are The author- 
 
 J . * ityofthe 
 
 represented by Ignatius as successors not of the episcopate 
 
 never held 
 
 Apostles but rather of Christ or God. they are clothed by the 
 
 presbyters. 
 
 with that monarchical authority, which had belonged 
 to the Apostles, but never to the presbyters : only 
 the bishops are limited in the exercise of their 
 authority to one church, whereas the apostolic office 
 had been more general. Once again the office of the 
 bishop in Ignatius is distinguished from the pres- 
 byterate, when he speaks of the 'youthful rank' 
 of one who held it and bids his flock reverence him 
 none the less, in words which recall St. Paul's exhor- 
 tation to his apostolic legate to let no man despise 
 his youth. 1 The office of presbyter, we know, was 
 not yet divorced from the qualifications and associa- 
 tions of age. 2 The bishops then in Ignatius succeed 
 to an authority which had been apostolic and had 
 never belonged to the presbyters. 3 
 
 1 ad Magn. 3. 
 
 2 The irpea/Surepoi are still put in contrast to i/ewrepoi or vtoi by Polycarp ad Phil. 
 5, as well as by Clement ad Cor. i. So in the Church Ordinances 16, 17. There is 
 no requirement of age for the bishop, but there is for the presbyters, c. 18 ^i>j 
 cexpoviKOTas eiri TCO xocrfxcu. 
 
 3 Dr. Lightfoot emphasizes the absence of sacerdotalism in Ignatius. See i. 
 p. 381 : 'There is not throughout these letters the slightest tinge of sacerdotal lan- 
 guage in reference to the Christian ministry.' I think I have said enough on this 
 subject already. Ignatius' words ad Smyrn. 8 : ' Let that be held a valid 
 eucharist which is under the bishop or one to whom he shall have committed it ' 
 are hardly what is commonly called unsacerdotal. There is indeed a striking absence 
 of the false sacerdotalism which identifies church office with spiritual nearness to 
 God, see ad Smyrn. 6 '. TOJTOS /nrj5fVa <jtv<rtovTta' TO yap oAop i<rrlv TTCOTI? KOI aydmj, 
 up ovSey jrpoicpiTai. A passage (ad Philad. 9), in which he contrasts the priests of 
 the old covenant with 'the High-priest' of the new, may suggest a reason for his 
 repudiating sacerdotal terms about the Christian ministry. The term had still 
 associations too Judaic to be admissible. In regard to the unseen Christ there was 
 no danger of mistake, and the recognition of His High-priesthood guaranteed the
 
 278 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 summary of We are now in a position to sum up the results of 
 
 results from . . . , , , _ A , . _,, , 
 
 Palestine, our investigation with regard to the Judaic Churches 
 and those of Syria and Asia. All the indications 
 we have would lead to the belief that the chief 
 authority of government, ministry, and ordination 
 passed from the Apostles and those who ranked with 
 them to the bishops of the period of Ignatius without 
 ever having belonged to the presbyters. James, ' the 
 first bishop,' is a man of apostolic rank and authority 
 settled in Jerusalem, and his office devolved upon a 
 line of bishops after him, who were in the Church of 
 Jerusalem what he had been, except so far as his 
 position had depended upon his personal character 
 and relation to our Lord. The Didache presents us 
 with a chief ministry in the Church not yet localized, 
 the holders of this Christian ' high-priesthood ' being 
 known as ' prophets ' and associated with other 
 evangelists known as 'apostles' or 'teachers.' The 
 authority, however, of the survivors of the twelve 
 seems to have promoted a transition to a state of 
 things in which we have a ruler-in-chief localized in 
 each community, like Ignatius in Syria, Polycarp at 
 Smyrna, and the other bishops whom Ignatius' 
 letters present to us. These rulers, though they 
 bear a name transferred from the presbyterate, hold 
 that office of representing the supreme authority of 
 Christ and of the Father, which had belonged to 
 James and his successors at Jerusalem, to prophets 
 and teachers, and to apostolic legates, but never to 
 the presbyters. There was not indeed such a localized 
 ruler in every Church in the age immediately after 
 
 sacerdotal character of His Church in the general sense. We may notice that he 
 speaks of the bishops, presbyters, and deacons at Philadelphia as appointed in 
 accordance with the mind of Jesus Christ and established by Him with the Holy 
 Spirit in confirmation of their office ; see ad Philad. inscr.
 
 I.] TJte Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 279 
 
 the destruction of Jerusalem ; but there is no reason 
 why we should not believe such a tradition as assigns 
 to St. Peter the foundation of the episcopate at 
 Antioch, i.e. there is no reason against believing that 
 there was from the first a representative of apostolic 
 authority localized at Antioch, or indeed at the other 
 chief centres of Christian life. But, even if this and 
 similar traditions present us with the facts somewhat 
 idealized, as is the habit of tradition, at least they do 
 not misrepresent the facts. It would certainly 
 appear that the episcopal authority at Antioch and 
 elsewhere was derived direct from that of ' apostles 
 and prophets' and had never passed through the 
 presbyterate. It was an authority which represents 
 devolution from above and not delegation from 
 below. 
 
 It will not have been forgotten with what strength The west 
 of conviction the western traditions of the later half t ion?n 
 of the second century represent the authority of the ce 
 episcopal successions then existing as derived from 
 the Apostles. It is enough to recall the testimony 
 of Irenaeus, corroborated as it is by that of the 
 earlier Hegesippus, as to the list of bishops of 
 Rome, running back through Clement to Linus who 
 was entrusted with the episcopate by the Apostles 
 Peter and Paul after they had founded the Church, 
 and the assertion of Dionysius of Corinth (writing 
 about A.D. 170) that his namesake the Areopagite 
 had been the first to be entrusted with the episco- 
 pate at Athens. 1 The confidence of these imme- 
 morial traditions at this early date is at least very 
 impressive. ' Episcopacy,' Dr. Lightfoot says, ' is so 
 
 1 Euseb. H.E. iv. 23: WJXOTO? rij? iv 'AOijycu? irapotKt'ac TT|I> <iri<ncoiri|v
 
 280 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 inseparably interwoven with all the traditions and 
 beliefs of men like Irenaeus and Tertullian, that they 
 betray no knowledge of a time when it was not. . . . 
 Their silence [as to any controversy about it] suggests 
 a strong negative presumption, that while every other 
 point of doctrine or practice was eagerly canvassed, 
 the form of church government alone scarcely came 
 under discussion.' l 
 
 Historical We have then now to enquire how far this ' con- 
 fidence of boasting ' about the apostolic succession is 
 justified by the indications which history gives us of 
 the development of the ministry in the Churches of 
 Europe between the period of apostolic presidency 
 and the age of Irenaeus and Dionysius. 
 
 The historical links are afforded by three docu- 
 ments : the Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians, 
 that of Polycarp to the Philippians, and the Shepherd 
 of Hermas. 
 
 IV. 
 
 iv. Epistle Clement, who is the real writer of the Epistle which 
 
 of Clement. . , otti i 
 
 The writer, commonly bears his name, 2 though he merges his 
 personality in his Church and writes as Jerome says 
 'ex persona ecclesiae Romanae,' is a very different 
 man from the intense, abrupt, fervid Ignatius. But, 
 though he writes in a very different tone, it is with 
 the same general purpose as moved Ignatius it is to 
 uphold the authority of the church ministry against 
 schismatic aggression. Whatever may have been his 
 
 1 Dissert, p. 227. It should be noticed that the views of Ambrosiaster, Jerome, 
 etc. as to the original government of the Churches by equal presbyter-bishops and the 
 subsequent creation of the monarchical episcopate do not seem to rest on tradition, 
 except perhaps at Alexandria, but to be based on exegetical grounds like the views 
 of later scholars. 
 
 2 As Dionysius of Corinth first assures us.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 281 
 
 origin, 1 Clement is a thorough Roman in his respect 
 for the principle of order, and he insists upon it with 
 a strong yet gentle reasonableness, or (to quote 
 a phrase which occurs twice in his letter) with an 
 'intense moderation.' 2 
 
 There is not much of theological insistence in 
 Clement's letter, for he has no pressing heresy to 
 combat. 3 His mind's eye is constantly fixed in 
 admiration on the divine order and harmony in 
 things and on the duty which lies upon all men of 
 respecting this principle in the several departments 
 of life. For the order of civil government he has a 
 Roman's veneration, and (though his Church was 
 still passing through the fiery furnace of Domitian's 
 persecution) he realizes with no difficulty at all the 
 duty St. Paul insists upon of praying for kings and all 
 who are in authority, and gives the Roman state the 
 full support of his Church's intercessions. 4 He em- 
 phasizes again how the strength of the army depends 
 upon each man knowing, and submissively keeping, 
 his place in the common order. 5 In the wider area 
 he loves to think of order as ' heaven's first law,' as 
 the life of the whole of nature and the joy of the 
 angelic hosts. 6 His mind is akin to Richard Hooker's 
 as he meditated when he lay a-dying ' the number 
 and nature of angels and their blessed obedience 
 and order, without which peace could not be in 
 
 1 Lightfoot thinks he was a Hellenist Jew. 
 ~ See Lightfoot Clement \. pp. 96-7. 
 
 3 The contents of cc. 24-26, however, may indicate a renewed tendency among the 
 Corinthians to disbelieve in the resurrection. In his theology Clement shows his 
 true character as a harmonizer both by holding together the teaching of St. John, 
 St. Paul, and St. James, and by emphasizing the motives which Christian theology 
 suggests making for self-suppression, and peace (see c. 16). 
 
 4 cc. 60, 61. The date of the Epistle is about A.D. 95. On Domitian's persecution, 
 see Ramsay, pp. 259 flf. 
 
 15 c. 37. 6 cc, 2O) 2^ ( 60.
 
 282 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 heaven ; and oh that it might be so on earth ! ' 
 Then finally in the kingdom of God's redemptive 
 love there is order also. On this consideration are 
 based the special exhortations to the suppression of 
 selfish ambition and rivalry which Clement's Church 
 addresses under his guidance to the Church at 
 
 the?e s uer f Corinth. 1 For, led by one or two reckless and 
 ambitious young men, 2 they had rebelled against 
 their legitimate hierarchy, had causelessly deposed 
 some of their presbyters, and whether or no they 
 had other presbyters with them taking part in the 
 rebellion had raised a schism against them and left 
 their obedience. The evil had not been of short 
 standing, but the Roman Church had not hitherto 
 been able to bring pressure to bear upon them owing 
 to the ' sudden and successive calamities and 
 disasters' she was passing through under the per- 
 secuting rule of Domitian. 
 
 h l^" The Epistle runs to this effect. The Corinthians 
 
 siiincc. A 
 
 are bidden to bear in mind the shame it will be if a 
 reputation such as their Church has borne is allowed 
 to be overthrown by the ambitions of two or three, 
 and the foolish party spirit of the rest. They used 
 to be men walking after the ordinances of God, in 
 due submission to their spiritual rulers, holding in 
 abomination all sedition and schism. But now there 
 is a reversal of all this. There is amongst them a 
 renewed outbreak of the old danger of party-spirited 
 adherence to particular leaders, 3 against which 
 St. Paul had warned them. But the last evil is 
 
 1 He does not shrink from adducing examples of pagan self-sacrifice in the cause 
 of unity : iroXAoi et;f\iopr)O'a.v iSuav 7ro\eiav 'iva. firj tTTatna^tafnv erri. irXeiov. 
 
 2 Their youth seems to follow from the emphasis Clement lays (c. 3.) on the 
 reverence due from youth to age. 
 
 3 c. 47 n-poo-fcAtVei?.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 283 
 
 worse than the first, for their proclivities are directed 
 now not to apostolic men but to self-interested 
 schismatics. They should recognise how in Scrip- 
 ture and history, ancient and recent, all evils have 
 come of jealousy or self-interest such as stir party 
 leaders and their followers even as in their own 
 generation such temper had caused St. Peter and 
 St. Paul to be put to death while all good, on the 
 other hand, had come of obedience and humility. 
 They should recognise how the divine principle of 
 order prevails in nature, in civil and military govern- 
 ment, in the organism of the human body, in the 
 very mission of Christ a divine principle which 
 upon all men and things makes everywhere the 
 claim of submission and obedience. Above all, this 
 must be recognised in the Church. In the Jerusalem 
 of the old covenant there is a divine law of service 
 a divine prescription of times and places and persons 
 and the principle has passed into the new covenant. 
 Here too he that would serve God and offer his 
 worship with acceptableness must submit to require- 
 ments of time and place and the appropriation of 
 special functions to special orders. High-priest, 
 priest, Levite, and layman must observe the ap- 
 pointed rule of His service. Specially of old there 
 had been a divinely ordained ministry of Moses' 
 appointment certificated by a special miracle of the 
 budding rod, and the sanction of a miraculous 
 punishment on those who invaded its peculiar 
 privileges. 
 
 So too under the Christian covenant the Apostles 
 instituted in the churches which they founded a 
 ministry of bishops dnd deacons, in continuation of 
 their own mission from Christ and in fulfilment of
 
 284 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 prophecy : and further, in view of the strife which 
 they foresaw would arise over the episcopal office, 
 they made provision for a succession in this ministry. 
 Now it was men appointed in accordance with this 
 apostolic provision by men of repute in the Church 
 with the consent of the whole body, and who had 
 fulfilled their ministry without reproach it was such 
 men whom the Corinthians had now deposed from 
 their sacred functions. What a sin was such deposi- 
 tion ! What a judgment it must bring on those who 
 are guilty of it ! 
 
 So seriously and authoritatively does the Roman 
 community bid the Corinthians hear God's will speak- 
 ing by them, to consider their ways and be wise : and 
 the letter passes into a prayer, the prayer of one 
 who ' lifts up his hands without wrath or doubting ' 
 in orderly and harmonious intercession intercession 
 which seems to represent the form which, under 
 Clement's auspices, was being given to the ' prayer 
 of the oblation ' in the Roman Church. 
 Passages We proceed to quote the passages which have an 
 
 bearing on. . . , .., .- /- 
 
 the ministry immediate bearing on the principle and form of the 
 ministry. 
 
 Formerly ' ye did all things without respect of persons, and ye walked 
 after the laws of God, submitting to your rulers and rendering to the 
 presbyters among you their appropriate honour a ; and upon your 
 young men ye enjoined a modest and grave state of mind, and your 
 
 * c. I '. viroTawo'djiiei'Oi rot? 7)yovftVois vfuav xal TtjUTji>;Tijv KaOrjKOV(rav aTrovt'/iOVTes 
 rots irap' vfiiv 7rpe(r/3vTe'poi?. Lightfoot translates the last word ' the older men,' but 
 the word is used of the church officers in cc. 47 and 57, and must be given the same 
 meaning here (see Gebhardt and Harnack in loc.). The use of TI^T; is almost 
 technical, see Didache xv. 2 : avroi yap [bishops and deacons] eio-iv ot TeTi^/aeVot 
 vfjLiav fifTa. TUV irpo<l>r)T<av Kal SiSao'Ka.b.iav, and cf. i Tim. v. 17. It is no objection to 
 this that the ' presbyters ' are opposed to the ' young men ' : the same antithesis 
 appears in i Peter v. 1-5 and Polyc. ad Phil. 5, 6, where there can be no doubt of 
 the reference to office. The word still retained the associations of age : very likely 
 in the earliest Church, where clergy were not debarred from ordinary work, an elder 
 man, where his reputation was satisfactory, commonly became a presbyter in office. 
 Here the antithesis of elder and younger is partly due to the fact that the rebels
 
 VI.] Tfie Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 285 
 
 women ye commanded to do all in a blameless and grave and pure 
 conscience.' 
 
 But now all is changed : ' men were stirred up, the mean against 
 the honourable, the ill-reputed against the highly-reputed, the foolish 
 against the wise, the young against the elders 51 (Is. iii. 5). 
 
 ' Let us fear the Lord Jesus whose blood was given for us ; let us 
 reverence our rulers, let us honour our presbyters, let us instruct our 
 young men in the lesson of the fear of God, let us bring back our 
 women to the standard of good behaviour.' 2 
 
 ' Let us enlist ourselves with all earnestness in His faultless ordin- 
 ances. Let us consider those who are enlisted under our rulers, 3 with 
 what order, with what submission, with what subordination they ac- 
 complish what is enjoined. All are not prefects, nor rulers of thousands, 
 nor rulers of hundreds, nor rulers of fifties, and so forth, but each one 
 in his own order accomplishes what is enjoined by the king and the 
 rulers. The great cannot exist without the small or the small without 
 the great ; there is a certain mixture in all things and therein is utility. 
 Let us take our body as an instance. The head is nothing without 
 the feet, etc. . . . All parts conspire and accept one obedience for 
 the preservation of the whole body. Therefore let our whole body be 
 preserved in Christ Jesus, and let each man submit to his neighbour, 
 even as he was appointed in the special grace given him.' 4 
 
 ' All this then being manifest to us, even as we have gazed into the 
 depths of the divine knowledge, we ought to do all that the Lord 
 commanded to be performed in order, at appointed times. The offer- 
 ings and ministrations he commanded to be performed, and not at 
 random or without order, but at definite times and hours. Where 
 and by whom He wills that they should be performed, He Himself 
 ordained by His supreme choice, so that all being done holily in 
 well-pleasing might be acceptable to His will. Those then who 
 accomplish their offerings at the appointed times are acceptable and 
 blessed, for following the laws of the Master they fall into no sin. 
 For to the high-priest his own proper ministrations have been assigned, 
 and to the priests their proper place ordained, and their proper 
 ministries enjoined upon the Levites ; the layman has been bound by 
 
 seem to have been young men. Hermas exactly in the same way (as will be noticed) 
 distinguishes jrpoTfyovjxei/ot from TrpioTOKcUMpirai ( = 7rpeo-0urpoi). This is, I think, 
 enough to remove any doubt that may be felt as to Clement's language, which again 
 recurs in c. 21. 
 
 1 TOVS 7rpe<r/3ure'povs, but the reference is to Isaiah. 
 
 2 c. 21 : TOUJ TrpOTj-yovfieVous j\^!av a.iSecrOii>iifv, TOW? jrp<r/?VT'povs Tinrjvuifiev 
 (Lightfoot again ' elders '). Here again ' rulers ' are specified besides ' presbyters ' as 
 the authorities in the Church. 
 
 3 TOIS TjyoufieVots rjjiwv, i.e. our secular rulers. 
 
 4 cc. 37, 38. The last words are Ka0u>? <coi T07j iv rep gapta-part avrou.
 
 286 Christian Ministry, [CHAP. 
 
 the layman's ordinances. 1 Let each of us, brethren, in his own order 
 make his Eucharist to God in gravity, abiding in a good conscience, 
 not transgressing the appointed rule of his ministration. Not everywhere, 
 brethren, are offered the daily sacrifices or freewill-offerings or sin- 
 and trespass-offerings, but in Jerusalem alone ; and there is offering 
 made not in every place but before the holy place at the altar, after the 
 offering has been inspected by the high-priest and the aforesaid 
 ministers. They then who do anything contrary to what His will has 
 thought fitting have death for their penalty. See, brethren, in as 
 much as we have been thought worthy of more knowledge, to so much 
 greater a peril are we subject. 2 
 
 1 c. 40 : TJpoSrjAcoi' ovv yfiuv ovriav rovriav, (cat eyice/tv<^dTes et? TO. fidOr) TJJS flet'as 
 yvdxretas, iravra. Txet iroielv v4>ci\0fj.ev o<ra 6 Secnronjs em.re\elv e/ceAevcrei/ Kara 
 Kaipoiis TcTayfit'i/ovs' Tas re irpo<7<opas (cat AetTOVpyi'a? e7TiTeAei<j-0ai, /cat OVK eixrj rj 
 oraKTws eice'Aevo-ev ytVe<r(?ai, aAA* copiovxtVot? xacpoc; ical copais' nov re KOJ. Sid riviav 
 ejriTeAetO'flai fle'Aet, aurbs <upto"ei/ 17) vneprarta avTOu /SovAvjo'ei, lv' oai'cos iratna. 
 yivo/xefa ev evSoKijerci evwpoo~oeKTa, eir; T<i> 0eAij/u.aTt auToO. ot oJy rots Trpoo'TeroyfieVots 
 Kacpoi; Troiouires TOS 7rpo<r<^opas avrStv evnp6(r&eKToi re (cat fio.Ka.pioi- TOIS yap 
 I'Ofit/jioi? TOU SetTTroTOv aKoAoufloui'Tes ov fitajaapTavoucriv. T<j> yap dpx'epei ifitai 
 Aeirovpyiai Se5o/u.Vai etirii' ai rots iepev<7n/ ifiios 6 TOTTOS Trpoo-TeVaKTai xac AeviVais 
 iStai Siaxortai eiriVeii/Tai' 6 Aalfcbs avSpwiros TOIS AaiVcois Trpoorayjuao'ii' Scfierat. 
 
 It will be apparent, as this and the following chapters are read, that the Church 
 of the new covenant is spoken of under terms of the old, so instinctively alive is 
 Clement to the continuity of principle between the two. ' Non negare possum,' says 
 Lipsius, 'V.T. hierarchiam quae vocatur, hoc loco ad Christianorum societatem 
 accommodari.' As the layman is the Christian layman, it is natural to suppose that 
 there was a threefold ministry corresponding to the high-priest, priest, and Levite, 
 but it must be observed that an analogy is claimed in respect of place and time, as 
 well as of ministers, and, as it cannot be pressed in the former case, so also it can- 
 not in the latter. But the language is certainly more natural if Clement had in view 
 a threefold Christian ministry. 
 
 2 c. 41 : "EicaaTOS T)i*.!av, dSeA^oi, iv T<a iSico ray/nan ev^apio-reiVw flew ev ayaSjj 
 <7Wei5)crei inr<ip\iav, JU.TJ trope tcfiaiviov TOV upifffievov rrjs Aeiroupyi'as avrou Kavova, 
 lv crefX.i/OTT)Ti. oil ira.vra\ov, deA<j>ot, irpoa'(t>epovTat Bvaiai fv&f\ex i W>v ^ tv\S>v >j 
 Trept dftaprcas Kal 7rAT)^jueAct'a9, dAA' ff iv ' ItpouiraAr)/x fidvr)' KCLKCI Se OVK ev iravri 
 rorrta jrpo<r<^c'pTat, aAA' efjLirpocr6ev TOV j/aou jrpbs TO Ovtriao-rripiov, iLiaiwtTKOirriOev TO 
 npo<T^>ep6iJievov Sia ToO ap\iepeios KO! T<OI> irpoeipij/^e'vcov AetTOUpywv ot oil/ Tropa TO 
 KaBfixov Tiijs /3ouArj<recos avTOv TrotovvTe's TI, 9a.va.rov TO irp6<rri[jLOV ex ov<riv - opart, 
 a5tA(f>or 6o"w wAetovos (canjf tw0i)|uiei' yv<oo"e<os, TOCTOVTW /xaAAor vOKeifj.e6a KivSvvta. 
 
 I have translated evxapiOTeiTa> 'make his Eucharist.' Clement uses the word in 
 a general sense for ' to give thanks ' in c. 38. But here he is describing that formal 
 act of thanksgiving in which the whole Church approaches in due order before God, 
 and that is the Eucharist in the technical sense. The verb^has its technical meaning 
 in the Didache (ix. i, x. i, 7, xiv. i) in close connection with its general meaning 
 (ix. 2, x. 2) and the substantive evxapiorta also occurs (ix. i) in its technical sense. 
 It appears however that the author of the Church Ordinances read fvapea-reiria, 
 and this is the reading of the Constantinople MS. and of the Syriac version. Thus 
 Harnack prefers it (Textt u. Untersuck. Band ii. Heft 5, p. 27). On the other hand 
 the alteration of evxapio-TeiYw into evapea-reiria is more probable than vice versA, 
 and Lightfoot retains evxaptoreirw as 'doubtless the right reading.'
 
 VI.] TJu Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 287 
 
 'The Apostles were sent to us with the Gospel from the Lord Jesus 
 Christ, Jesus the Christ was sent forth from God. Christ then is from 
 God and the Apostles from Christ ; it took place in both cases in due 
 order by the will of God. They then having received commandments, 
 and having been fully assured through the resurrection of the Lord Jesus 
 Christ and confirmed in the word of God, with full assurance of the 
 Holy Spirit went forth preaching the Gospel that the kingdom of God 
 was about to come. Preaching then in country and town they 
 appointed their firstfruits, when they had tested them in the Spirit, for 
 bishops and deacons of those who were about to become believers. 
 And this was no new thing, for of old it had been written about bishops 
 and deacons. For thus says the Scripture : ' I will appoint their 
 bishops in righteousness and their deacons in faith' (Is. Ix. I7). 1 And 
 what wonder is it if those who were entrusted in Christ from God with 
 so great a work appointed these aforesaid officers ? Since even the 
 blessed Moses, the " faithful servant in all the house," indicated all that 
 was enjoined upon him in the sacred books.' 
 
 Here follows a description of Moses' conduct 
 (Numb, xvii.) when ' envy arose as to the priesthood 
 and the tribes made revolt because they were 
 ambitious of that glorious title.' Moses knew be- 
 forehand, he says, that Aaron's rod would bud. But 
 he acted as he did to prevent disorder in Israel, 
 and for Gods' glory. 2 So in the same way, he 
 continues : 
 
 ' Our Apostles also knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there 
 would be contention about the title of the episcopate. Therefore on 
 this account, having received perfect fore-knowledge, they appointed 
 the aforesaid [bishops and deacons], and subsequently gave an 
 
 1 C. 42 : Oi airooroAoi riiJ.iv vi)yyeAio-07)O-ai' irrb TOV Kvptov ' IT)<TOU Xpiorov, I. 6 
 X. curb TOV Oeov ecirc'fi4>0>>- Xpiorbs ovv airb TOV Oeov, icai 01 airooroAot airo TOU 
 Xpiorov' fyevovTO ovv auiorepa evraxTcos ex fleATjfiaTOS Oeov. irapayycAta; ovv 
 \aJ36vTfS xai irAi)po4>opT)0c'iTc; Sia TTJS ayaaTacreuj; TOV K. "I. X. icai iritrriaBfvref iv 
 T<a Aoyw TOU Oeov, nera irAijpo^opux; JTVCV/A<ITOS efTJAflov rvayycAt^op.cvoi rifv 
 jSaO'iAciap TOV Oeov fLcAAcip ep\ea-9ai. Kara, ^ojpa? ovv icai iro\6if KTjpvcrcrotres 
 KoBCfrravov Tas aTrop^o; avruf, oxi/j.a<7arr$ TO? irvevfiaTi, is cirio-ic6irov$ xai 
 Siajcovovs rial' /ieA^diTiui' irt<rrfvfiv. icai. TOVTO ov /caii'tos K.T.A.. 
 
 2 c. 43 : jAov efi>reo"6TOS >repi TTJ? itpoxruvTrfy icai oreuriafouawi' Toil' <f>v\Stv 6>roi'a 
 avTwy eii) rai fvooif 6rd/j.oTi Kenoo~ii.iiii.fvri K.r.A. Moses is afterwards said to lay the 
 rods eiri riji' Tpdm^av TOV 6eov, and then to explain that the rod of whichever tribe 
 should bud, Tovnjv eA'\Tat 6 0eb? ets TO tepaTeveci' not AeiTovpyciv avrw. But 
 Moses foreknew (n-pojjoti) the result.
 
 288 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 additional injunction in order that, if they fell asleep, other approved 
 men might succeed to their ministry. They, then, who were appointed 
 by those [Apostles] or subsequently by other distinguished men with 
 the consent of the whole Church, and who have exercised their ministry 
 blamelessly to the flock of Christ with humility, quietly and without 
 display, and have had good witness borne them by all again and again, 
 these we do not think to be justly cast out of their ministry. For it 
 will be no small sin to us if we cast out of the episcopate those who 
 have blamelessly and holily offered the oblations. Blessed are those 
 presbyters who passed on their journey before, for they made t their 
 departure with good fruit and completeness ; for they have no cause for 
 fear lest any one remove them from their determined place. For we 
 perceive that you have removed some, though their conversation was 
 honourable, out of the ministry which had been observed by them 
 without reproach.' 1 
 
 1 c. 44 : Kai ot airoffToAoi T\\uav eyv<a<ra.v Sia TOV icupiov rj/nii 1 '1. X. OTI Ipis eorai 
 eiri ToG opo/naTOS TTJS ejrio"KOjrij. fiia rauTrji' oZv TTJV alriav irpoyviaffiv eiAr)</>OTes 
 TeAetai/ Ka.rea'Trja'av TOVS jrpoeiprjfie'covs, (tat jaerafu eiru'O/Arjf eSiaxav orrcos, fav 
 KoijU.T)da><7if, fiiaSefwirai eVepoi SeSoKi/ixao-joiei/oi aVSpes Tr)v AeiToupyi'ai' avTaJi/. TOVS 
 o5f (caraoTafleVTas tur' exeivoiv i) ftera^ir v<' erep<av eAAoyi'/aioi' ai'Spwi/ <ruveu8oCT)<ro(ri)s 
 Trjs eKxArjo'ias ira<rijs, Kal AeiTOvpyjjo'afTas djae/j.7rro)? T<J> iroipviif TOV X. jtiera 
 TaTreivo^poOTJinjs, r)(rux<as (cat a/SavavVios, /xe^-apTupTj/ncVous re woAAois ^po^O'S VTTO 
 Trawioi', TOUTOUS ou Si/cai'tos yo/ou'fo/uei' airojSdAAecrSai ri}s AeirovpYtas. d^iapria yap ou 
 jmiKpa ij/xti' ecrrai eav TOUS a/u.e/jnrT(os Kal oeriw? irpcxreveyKovTas ra'Siapa. n7S 7ri<7Kojr^s 
 arro.SaAcu/xt-i'. fxaxaptoi ot TrpoSonrop^cravTe? Trpecr/Surepoi, oirtves eyicapirov xai 
 reAeiav i&xov TTJV ai/aAvow ov yap eiAa/Soui'Tai /U.TJ TIS auroiis fieTaoTijcnj aTrb TOU 
 iSpvft.evov avrois TOTTOU. opd)/xti/ yap on evtous Ujiteis jaerr/yayere KaAwr TroAirevaa- 
 /xeVous e TIQS antefurrus avTOis TeTtju.r)jx.eV>)s AetTOupyias. 
 
 () In spite of variations in MSS. and versions, the word given above, en-ipo/mii/, has 
 been accepted as right since the discovery by Dom Morin of a primitive Latin version 
 which reads ' legem dederunt.' ' Legem ' would render eTrii/Ojurji', ignoring the preposi- 
 tion, as 'sciebat ' renders jrpojjSei just before, cc. xliii. 6. (See Anecdota Maredsolana 
 \\. Parker's Oxford.) We may assume then that this word means 'an additional in- 
 junction,' that the reference in TT\V Aetrovpyi'av avriov is to the ministry of the ' bishops ' 
 (cf. the constant use of Aciroupyi'a and Aeirovpyeii' in this chapter), and that the words 
 iav (coifAjjOwo-if refer also to them and not to the apostles. Thus the meaning of 
 the passage is plain enough. The Apostles made some arrangement to secure an 
 unquestionable succession to the office of the presbyter-bishops, if its first holders 
 should pass away (before the end, and the Apostles also were no longer at hand to 
 appoint new ones). The result of this arrangement had been that, in the interval 
 since the appointment of the first presbyters by the Apostles, other presbyters had 
 been duly appointed by certain ' distinguished men' in the Church. It seems to me 
 certain that these cAAoyiftoi avSpcs, who in accordance with the apostolic arrange- 
 ment had since their death appointed 'approved men,' are not the same as the 
 ' approved men,' but different. The apostolic arrangement must have consisted in 
 providing that there should be after their death this body of ' distinguished men ' in 
 the Church to appoint presbyters and deacons. See Kuhl Gemeindeordnung, p. 
 135-8. [But I am still tempted to wonder whether en-ivo^c eSoiKav may not mean 
 ' they instituted a jurisdiction ' or ' supervision ' ? Cf. the schol. on Pindar Pyth. 
 xi. 7 (quoted in Stephanus Thesaurus Ling. Grace, s.v. eircpofxo;) irtVo/noi> TOV
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 289 
 
 ' It is shameful, dearly beloved, yes utterly shameful and unworthy 
 of the life in Christ, that it should be reported that the very steadfast 
 and ancient Church of the Corinthians, for the sake of one or two 
 persons, is making sedition against its presbyters.' 1 
 
 'Who therefore [with reference to Moses' conduct, Exod. xxxiL 
 30 f.] is noble among you ? Who is compassionate ? Who is fulfilled 
 with love ? Let him say : " If by reason of me there be faction and 
 strife and schisms, I retire, I depart, whither ye will, and I do that 
 which is ordered by the people : only let the flock of Christ be at peace 
 with its duly-appointed presbyters. " ' 2 
 
 ' Ye therefore that laid the foundation of the sedition, submit your- 
 selves unto the presbyters and receive chastisement unto repentance, 
 bending the knees of your heart." 3 
 
 ' It is right for us to give heed to so great and so many examples and 
 to submit the neck and, occupying the place of obedience, to take our 
 side with them that are the leaders of our souls.' 4 
 
 <ravvoy.Qv Taij 8>jais TOP ejrl TOV OVTOV pofioC <cai TTJS aurijs cTrivo/irj;. Otherwise 
 eTi-ipo/uiTJ is used (i) very frequently by Galen de fasciis to mean the revolutions or 
 additional applications of a bandage. He describes first the original direction in 
 which it is to be applied (eirive'/iijo-ts), and then directs that it should be rolled on 
 in the same direction ai Se empojioi Ka.ro. rtav avn>v. See Kuhn Medici Graeci, 
 vol. xviii. pp. 787. 16, 791. n, 791. i, 793. ii, 795. i, 12, etc. (2) By Plutarch for 
 the advance of a fire, 'depastio ignis.' But whether or no emvo/mj can mean juris- 
 diction or supervision, it does seem to me that the meaning of the apostolic arrange- 
 ment is made manifest by its result, namely, that there had existed since the 
 Apostles a body of ' distinguished men ' to appoint to the local church offices, with 
 the consent of the whole Church]. 
 
 (b) ov SIKO.UOS po/xi'<Jb^ep diro/3aAAe<r0at K.T.X. St. Clement uses somewhat 
 minimizing language of the highest goods and the worst evils, cf. c. 19, where he 
 speaks of the character of the saints having ' improved us.' In this moderation of 
 tone he contrasts with Ignatius. 
 
 (c) irpoo-<t>ip.v TO. Swpa. Cf. Apost. Const, viii. 12: oi SIO.KOVOI irpo<Ta.ytT<ao-a.v ra 
 Saipa Tta cTrio-KoVc.). Knowing as we do that Irenaeus and Justin Martyr alike 
 regarded the ' sacrifice ' of the Eucharist as centering round the oblations of the 
 bread and wine, and having in view the fact that Clement is here speaking of the 
 Church's ' liturgy ' as the spiritual counterpart of the sacrificial ' liturgy ' of the old 
 covenant, it seems to me impossible to doubt that the words Swpa irpoa-ifrfpfiv here 
 refer to the offering of the eucharistic gifts. Cf. Harnack Texte u. Untersuch. 
 Band ii, Heft 5, p. 144, note 73 : ' Beyond a doubt the npo&Qepfiv Siopa. TO? flew, in the 
 sense of offering sacrifices (Opferdarbringung), appears as the most important 
 function of the episcopus.' 
 
 (d) For TOU ifipujoteVov avrots TOJTOV cf. c. 40 TOIS Jepeutrip loios 6 TOITOS. 
 
 1 c. 47. 
 
 2 c. 54 ftera TUP Kafleorafie'pup Trpetr/Si/Te'puv. 
 
 c. S7- 
 
 * C. 63 : TOP TTJS vwaxorjs TOTTOP ap<nrXTjpui(TapTa?, irpo<TcAi07Jpai TOIS vjrop^ovo"ip 
 apXijyois T(av ^iu\<av yfLiav. For Toiros see cc. 40, 44, and Lightfoot in loc. The 
 layman too has his TOTTOS (c. 40 and cf. i Cor. xiv. 16). 
 
 T
 
 2go Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 Results: It remains for us to sum up the evidence of 
 
 Clement's Epistle so far as it affects the ministry. 
 (i)Themin- (\\ St. Clement speaks of the ministry in the 
 
 istry has r 
 
 (a) authority Church from two points of view. It represents the 
 
 in govern- ..... 
 
 mem; authority of government, and so claims obedience; 
 (*) a distinct but it also has its special function in relation to 
 thT'HturgV.' worship. The 'liturgy' of the Christian Church is 
 the perpetuation in principle of the ' liturgy ' of the 
 Jews, and, like the Church of the old covenant, she 
 approaches God as one body, differentiated in 
 function, with grades of privilege and dignity by the 
 appointment of God. 1 Thus it is the special function 
 of the bishops to 'offer the gifts.' It is often said 
 that Clement regards the distinction of offices in the 
 Church as only matter of ' order,' not of exclusive 
 power. He does however speak of each member of 
 the Church as qualified for his special function by a 
 special charisma; 2 and, though he speaks of mutual 
 subordination as the principle of 'utility,' yet he 
 illustrates it not only by the distinction of grades in 
 the Roman army, but by the differentiation of limbs 
 in the human body, and by the divinely-ordained 
 hierarchy of the Jewish Church. There is no reason 
 whatever to believe that the 'charisma' of any 
 'member of the body' who was not a presbyter- 
 bishop would have qualified him to offer the gifts. 
 ( 2 ) it is (2) Clement expresses very plainly the fundamental 
 
 succession principle of the apostolic succession. The Church's 
 Ap^stiel officers are appointed from above. The body of the 
 Church indeed has the privilege of assent or dissent 
 
 1 It corresponds to the high value which Clement clearly sets upon the Church's 
 worship that he should give us, as apparently he does, the eucharistic intercession, 
 with which he was accustomed to lead the worship of his Church (cc. 59-61). His 
 language seems in parts to have influenced the Liturgy of St. Mark ; see Lightfoot's 
 notes. 
 
 2 c. 38 : *ca8u>s Kttl ereOjj ev r<a xapiV/utm avroO.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 291 
 
 in their appointment, 1 and Clement may be held to 
 imply that under circumstances of misconduct it 
 could legitimately depose them, 2 but he clearly never 
 conceives that it could appoint them. The ministers 
 of the Church must derive their authority from that 
 one mission by which Christ came forth from God 
 and the Apostles from Christ : in virtue of which 
 these same Apostles appointed bishops and deacons 
 in the Churches which they first founded, and after- 
 wards took measures to secure the perpetuation of 
 their office in due succession. Clement then gives 
 us the two principles which involve the ' doctrine 
 of the apostolic succession ' : the principle that the 
 Church is a differentiated body in which different 
 individuals exercise different and clearly defined 
 functions, and the principle that the right to exercise 
 these functions, so far as they are ministerial, is 
 derived by succession from the Apostles. 
 
 (3) It is generally supposed 3 that in Clement's ( 3 ) There is 
 Epistle we have only two orders of ministers, viz. mperfwto 
 presbyter-bishops and deacons, recognised in the presbyter 
 Church. But this supposition though there need 
 be no objection to it on the ground of principle 
 does not seem to account for all the phenomena 
 which the Epistle presents. It is quite true that 
 presbyters are also called bishops, and that there is 
 no local authority in the Church at Corinth above 
 the presbyters. Clement's language about submission 
 to them postulates this. It may also be acknowledged 
 
 1 c. 44. 
 
 2 This is probably implied in the rebuke for having deposed blameless presbyters 
 (c. 44) ; cf. also 54 : jrotw TO. n7>o<rra<rcrdjuei>a VJTO TOV jrAijflow, though here 
 the supposed speaker is not necessarily a presbyter. But it would probably be 
 the case that the Church could depose the presbyters only by an appeal to a higher 
 authority, cf. i Tim. v. 19, 20. 
 
 8 As by Dr. Lightfoot Dissert, pp. 216, 218 ; and Dr. Langen Gesch. der rffm. 
 Kirche i. p. 82.
 
 292 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 that it is an unwarrantable hypothesis that the see 
 of Corinth was vacant when Clement wrote. But 
 it does not therefore follow that there is not in this 
 Epistle, as in the Didacke, the recognition of a superior 
 authority though it has yet no localized representa- 
 tion in the particular Church addressed. On the 
 contrary Clement's language seems to suggest, or 
 even to require, some such supposition. Besides the 
 presbyters whom the Corinthians are to 'honour/ there 
 is mention on two occasions 1 of their rulers whom they 
 are to reverence and obey. This repeated mention 
 of ' rulers ' as distinct from ' presbyters,' more particu- 
 larly as we find the same distinction in the Shepherd 
 of Hermas, cannot be overlooked; and the title 'ruler' 
 is already familiar to us as applied to men of the 
 highest order in the Church, like the prophets Judas 
 and Silas, and those who first brought the Gospel to 
 ' the Hebrews,' and the members of the royal family 
 of Christ who ' ruled ' in the Churches of Palestine. 2 
 Again there have been certain 'distinguished men,' 
 who in accordance with the arrangement made by the 
 Apostles have, since their death, appointed the pres- 
 byters. It appears then that Clement does recognise 
 a body of men who at least appointed the presbyters 
 at Corinth, and whom it is natural to identify with 
 the ' rulers ' mentioned elsewhere. ' Rulers ' is a 
 general term and we cannot tell what further official 
 
 1 cc. i, ai. Hermas makes a similar distinction (Vis. iii. g). See Hilgenfeld in 
 Zeitschr.furwiss. Theol., 1886, p. 23. 
 
 2 Acts xv. 22 ; Euseb. H.E. iii. 32 Trporjyoui'Tai Traorjs e/cKAT)<n'a? ; Heb. xiii. 7. 
 Here the ^yov/ievot are those apostolic preachers who have passed away ; but in 
 ver. 17 the present authorities amongst the Hebrews, ' who watch for their souls as 
 men who shall give account,' and whom they are to greet (ver. 24), are also called 
 TTyov/xevoi. These would more naturally be local ' presbyters ' but not necessarily, 
 more especially as the Epistle is not written to any one community : see on these 
 ' rulers ' Harnack Texte u. Untersuch Band ii, Heft i. pp. 95, 96. Later the expres- 
 sion is generally used for bishops (Euseb. H.E, iii. 36 ; Apost. Const, ii. 46) but not 
 always.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 293 
 
 title they had, if any, but we must recollect that there 
 is the same absence of a definite official title for the 
 'men of distinction' like Timothy and Titus, who 
 probably filled exactly the same position during the 
 lifetime of the Apostles. It is quite natural that they 
 should have been known sufficiently well as indi- 
 viduals and as men of quasi-apostolic authority to 
 make an exact title a matter of indifference. Definite 
 terminology is in the region of administration as of 
 theology a gradual growth. It is enough that we 
 should recognise that certain men in the Church were 
 understood to have the apostolic authority to ordain 
 elders and presumably the powers of control which 
 always accompanied that authority. This is a class 
 of men probably similar to the ' prophets ' and 
 ' teachers ' of the Didache, whose authority, as we 
 saw reason to believe, passed over to the local 
 presidents who were known as ' bishops.' Some 
 of them may have been already localized in other 
 Churches of Greece, only (as it appears) there was 
 not one on the spot at Corinth, though before the 
 time of Hegesippus a regular succession of diocesan 
 bishops was existing there as elsewhere. The fact 
 that no one of this order was yet resident in Corinth 
 may account for Clement's authoritative appeal to 
 that Church. 1 
 
 (4) For, though Clement cannot have been called a U) which 
 
 Clement 
 represented 
 
 1 It becomes natural then, as the prophet is called the Christian high-priest in the in Rome. 
 Didafhe, to see in Clement's analogical use of 'high-priest, priest, and Levite,' in 
 speaking of the Christian ministry, a reference to the three orders, of whom the 
 second and third are presbyter-bishops and deacons, but of whom the highest are 
 these 'rulers' and 'distinguished men,' who correspond to the prophets of the 
 Didache. 
 
 I do not wish to imply that the term eAAdyifios avijp was at all a title reserved 
 for these apostolic men. Clement uses it quite generally of the Corinthian Church 
 (c. 62) : avSpa.cn. iriorois icol cAAoyifuuraToi? KOI eyKemx}>6<Ti.v it.T.A. So he uses 
 t also of secular rulers (c. 37, 61).
 
 294 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 ' bishop ' in the later sense, his position in the earliest 
 tradition is so prominent that he must in fact have 
 been what would have been designated in later times 
 by that name. 1 He merges his own authority, as he 
 writes, in the Church which he represents, but in 
 the Church z not in the presbyterate, and the letter 
 therefore affords no evidence at all as to Clement's 
 relation to the other church officers. Thus, if we could 
 get behind the scenes, we should probably find that 
 the chief authority really belonged to him, and that 
 he was one of those ' men of reputation,' one of those 
 ' rulers,' who since the Apostles' death had exercised 
 that part of their ministry which was to become 
 permanent in the Church. One of this order must, 
 we should suppose, always have existed in so eminent 
 a Church as Rome. 
 
 1 The evidence "of the Clementines is enough to show us that Clement's per- 
 sonality made a great impression on his own generation and those that succeeded, 
 and it was as a church ruler and bishop that he impressed himself on the memory. 
 It is Clement in the Shepherd who is to communicate the messages given to 
 Hermas to the Churches of the other cities (eis TOS efco TrdAeis, exeiVcp yap 
 eTriTeVpaTTTai). He appears in the third place in the succession of Roman bishops 
 given by Irenaeus, and he doubtless held this place in the 'succession' which 
 Hegesippus drew up. It does not seem to me that the absence of specific mention 
 of the bishop in Ignatius' letter to the Church of Rome is any evidence at all against 
 there having been one. See Lightfoot I gnat. i. p. 381, also Dissert, p. 221, where 
 he remarks : ' the reason for supposing Clement to have been a bishop is as strong 
 as the universal tradition of the next ages can make it." See also Clement \. p. 68. 
 Clement cannot have been called a ' bishop ' in the later sense of the term, because 
 in his epistle he clearly calls the presbyters bishops, and this must reflect the usage 
 of the Roman Church. Perhaps, as suggested above, the distinction of men like 
 him, who bore some measure of the apostolic authority, may have made a fixed title 
 not yet indispensable. Clement of Alexandria (Strom, iv. 17, 105) quotes him as the 
 'apostle Clement.' His eucharistic prayer, as well as the teaching authority which 
 breathes in his epistle, and which is probably his own, suggests the prerogative 
 freedom of teaching and Eucharist which is assigned to the prophets in the Didache 
 (x. 7, xi, xii). 
 
 2 Dr. Salmon, Introd. p. 565 n., calls attention to the fact 'how all through the 
 first two centuries the importance of the bishop of Rome is merged in the importance 
 of his Church ' ; for instance, how Dionysius of Corinth writes to the Church of 
 Rome (Euseb. H.E. iv. 23), and how 'when Victor attempted to enforce uniformity 
 of Easter observance, it was still in the name of his church that he wrote. . . . This 
 is evidenced by the plural T) two-are in the reply of Polycrates ' (Euseb. v. 24).
 
 VI. The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 295 
 
 That this was the case is a good deal more than 
 matter of surmise. Irenaeus records 1 how 'the blessed 
 apostles, Peter and Paul, having founded and built up 
 the Church (at Rome) committed to Linus the office 
 of the Episcopate. This is the Linus of whom Paul 
 makes mention in his letter to Timothy. To him 
 succeeded Anencletus. After him, in the third place 
 from the apostles, Clement was allotted the bishopric ; 
 a man who had both seen the blessed apostles and 
 had had intercourse with them, in whose ears their 
 preaching was still echoing and their tradition was 
 still before his eyes ; and not his alone ; for there 
 were still many surviving who had been taught by the 
 apostles.' This catalogue of the early Roman suc- 
 cession, which rests probably on the investigations 
 of Hegesippus as well as of Irenaeus, 2 cannot, as 
 Dr. Lightfoot says, ' be treated otherwise than with 
 the highest respect. We can trace it back to a few 
 years later than the middle of the second century. 
 It comes from Rome itself. It was diligently gathered 
 there and deliberately recorded by two several writers 
 from different parts of Christendom.' 3 It is only 
 necessary to recognise that the Bishops of Rome 
 down to Clement did not bear the episcopal name. 
 
 1 See above p. HI. 
 
 2 See above pp. 115-16. 
 
 3 Bishop Lightfoot's investigations into the early Roman succession have vindi- 
 cated the Irenaean tradition as the only one which deserves the name. According 
 to this tradition Linus, Anencletus, and Clement are plainly bishops in succession 
 one to another. See, on the whole subject, his Clement i. pp. 66-8, and the 
 discussion, pp. 201 ff. He practically treats this succession as certainly historical, 
 pp. 76 ff.
 
 296 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 V 
 
 E'bUeof The letter of Polycarp to the Philippians was 
 Poiycarp. written under the following circumstances. Ignatius, 
 its occasion. i n company with others of the 'noble army of martyrs' 
 bound with the 'sacred fetters,' had passed from 
 Troas to Philippi on his way to Rome. There he 
 had held intercourse with the Philippian Christians, 
 and had bidden them, as he had bidden the other 
 Churches, send a letter to the bereaved Church of 
 Antioch. It was too far for them however to send 
 a messenger ; so they wrote to Polycarp of Smyrna 
 to request that his messenger might take their letter, 
 and to request him further to let them have any of 
 Ignatius' letters whether to his own Church or to 
 others that he might have in his possession. It 
 was in assent to this request that Polycarp wrote the 
 letter which has been preserved to us. 
 
 This Epistle is remarkable for its exhibition of the 
 saint's character, but remarkable also because of the 
 light it throws on the constitution of the Church of 
 Philippi. Polycarp writes no doubt as a bishop 
 ' Polycarp and the presbyters with him ' * but he 
 speaks of no bishop at Philippi, only of elders and 
 deacons, and bids the Philippians obey ' the elders 
 and deacons as God and Christ,' as if there was no 
 higher officer in question there. The elders moreover 
 are exhorted in terms which imply that the exercise 
 of discipline and the administration of alms belongs 
 
 1 Dr. Hatch (B. L. p. 88 n. 5 ) denies that Polycarp is here distinguishing himself 
 from his presbyters, but whatever the ambiguities of the phrase, it is cleared up by 
 the letters of Ignatius to Polycarp and to the Church of Smyrna. Polycarp was 
 admittedly bishop of Smyrna. He writes moreover in the first person.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 297 
 
 to them. 1 It is of course possible that amongst the 
 presbyters may have been one who was their presi- 
 dent and was known as 'bishop,' but Polycarp's 
 language does not suggest it, 2 nor is it a very reason- 
 able hypothesis that the see was vacant. 3 Are we 
 then to conclude that the only church authorities 
 recognised at Philippi were the presbyters and the 
 deacons? There is one consideration which seems 
 to make this view almost untenable. We have which must 
 
 .be reconciled 
 
 already seen that Ignatius when he wrote his epistles with igna- 
 
 * tius 1 visit. 
 
 from Smyrna certainly regarded episcopacy as ex- 
 tended ' to the ends of the earth ' 4 : with equal cer- 
 tainty he regarded it as an essential of church 
 organization 'without these [the three orders],' he 
 
 1 The following passages are here referred to : c. 5 : EtSores ovv, on Ofbs ou 
 /iVKrrjpifeToi cxieiAojxer afuus TTJS eiroATJs avrov tat 5o;s Trepi-areiv. 6/u.ouos 
 Siaxopoi afjiffj-TTTOi xtntviairiov avroO TTJS iiicaiocrv'njs, u9 fleov Kal Xptorov Siaicoi'oi 
 Kai ov<c dv^ptoiruf /XT; <5eaioAcH, HTJ Sc'Aoycu, di^iAapyvpoi, eyKparet? rrepi Traira, 
 ev<7Ti'Aoyx'Oi KOTO TTJI/ oATjfleiov TOV icvpi'ov, os eyfifro StoKovot JTOITOJI'. Here follow 
 some admonitions to young men to be blameless and pure, self-controlled in their 
 lives, keeping free from sensual sin ; then he continues : Sib Siov aire'xecrflat afo 
 iravriav rovriav, uTroTatro-OfieVovs TOIS jrpecr/SvTe'pot? KOI 5taxovo(; cus 8<j> cai Xptoru' 
 TOS irapOeVovs ev afj.iafj.ta jcai ayvj/ <rv>'ei5^<7ei irsptirareo'. 
 
 C. 6 : Kai oi irpea/Svrepoi 5e evcrirAayj; 1 ' 01 ! e 'S watTos eAeTJ/iOi/es, cffiorpe'^oiTes TO 
 oiToire7rAon;/iVa, effio-KeTiTOftevoi WOITOS oo^ever?, ^ii) ofieAoviTj X^P* 15 *1 op^ofou 
 ^ TreVrjTOS" aAAa TrporooGires del rov xaAov enoTrioi' dtov KOI d^0puiruv, dirc^d/iO'Oi 
 TTOOTJS opyrjs, 7rpocr(oiroA7)</'Ut$ l KpiVew9 d5iKOi>, fiaxpav oi'res TraaTjs 0tAapyvpiaf, /XT) 
 raxe'ws morevovres ICOTO rtvo?, /IT) atroTO/xot f (cpiVet K.T.A, Later on it is noticeable 
 that the prophets who are mentioned after the Apostles are the Old Testament 
 prophets who foretold Christ 
 
 c. 9. They are exhorted ' to obey the word of righteousness and to practise all 
 patience,' after the example of the blessed Ignatius and Zosimus and Rufus and 
 others who had lived among them, as well as of the Apostles. Then (in c. n, where 
 the Greek fails us) mention is made of the case of a presbyter Valens, ' qui presbyter 
 factus est aliquando apud vos quod sic ignore! is locum qui datus est ei.' It appears 
 that he had sinned through avarice and impurity and want of truth, and had shown 
 himself quite unfit for an office of government. ' Valde ergo, fratres, contristor pro 
 illo et pro coniuge eius, quibus det Dominus poenitentiam veram.' 
 
 2 Winterstein thinks that there must have been a 'bishop,' because only here are 
 ' deacons ' associated with presbyters, but this argument has no force for those who 
 admit that the titles presbyter and episcopus were at one time synonymous. Polycarp 
 of course would not call the presbyters bishops as St. Paul did (Phil. i. i). The 
 titles had become distinct. He speaks of presbyters and deacons only. 
 
 3 See Lightfoot Ignat. i. p. 578. * ad Eph. 3.
 
 298 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 had written, ' no Church has a title to the name.' 1 
 He moved from Smyrna to Troas, and his tone is 
 still the same ; there is the same insistence upon 
 episcopacy. Can he have been ignorant of the con- 
 dition of the Church at Philippi to which he was just 
 going ? He came thither and enjoyed, as we gather, 
 the same cordial intercourse which he had held in 
 other Churches. 2 He left behind him when he 
 passed on a venerated name. Had he rebuked them 
 or remonstrated with them in any way, we must 
 certainly have caught an echo of it through their 
 correspondence with Polycarp. It is impossible, on 
 the other hand, to believe that Ignatius suddenly 
 dropped the urgent tone about episcopacy which 
 had been one of the two main topics of all that he 
 wrote in Asia. Can we then consistently with the 
 phenomena of Polycarp's letter suppose a state of 
 things at Philippi which would not have shocked 
 Probable the mind of Ignatius ? The hypothesis of a superior 
 
 solution. J r 
 
 order in the Church, such as Clement's letter has 
 been seen to imply, of which no representative was 
 yet localized in the Church at Philippi, seems to meet 
 the conditions of the problem. This would suggest 
 a special reason why the 'apostolic and prophetic 
 teacher and bishop ' Polycarp 3 should address his 
 
 1 ad Trail. 3. I cannot think that Dr. Lightfoot is justified (Ignat. i. 382) in say- 
 ing that ' there is no indication that he is upholding the episcopal against any other 
 form of church government, as for instance the presbyteral. ... If Ignatius had 
 been writing to a Church which was under presbyteral government he would doubt- 
 less have required its submission "to the presbyters and deacons." As it is, he is 
 dealing with communities where episcopacy had been already matured and therefore 
 he demands obedience to their bishops." It seems to me as clear as day that 
 Ignatius regarded episcopacy as universal, and as the only legitimate form of church 
 government. 
 
 2 This we gather from the tone in which Polycarp's letter implies that the 
 Philippians had written about him ; see c. 13. Ignatius himself, we should 
 notice, had written to Polycarp from Philippi (eypa^are /uoi ical ii/xeis K.OA 
 Tyj/aTtos). 
 
 3 For Polycarp's prophetic character see his Martyrium cc. 5 and 16 : ev rots 
 Ka6' ^/ias xpo'roif SiSao-a\os awo<rTO\i(cbs <cai. irpo$T)T<.*cbs yevoV^os, eiric 
 
 iv 2/iVpKf) a-ya'as CKK\7)<7i'a?.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 299 
 
 exhortations to them, as it suggested a reason for the 
 similar appeal of Clement to the Corinthians. This 
 would postulate a state of things at Philippi which 
 Ignatius could at once have recognised as agreeable 
 to his standard of apostolic requirements. It is not 
 unlikely that Ignatius himself had been not merely 
 the bishop of Antioch but the only representative of 
 episcopal authority in Syria, 1 just as later in the 
 century it is not impossible that there was only one 
 bishop in the Churches of South Gaul. 2 What we 
 would suggest is not exactly that Philippi was in the 
 diocese of Thessalonica, 3 or of some other see, but 
 that we have still to do with a state of things which 
 is transitional between what is represented in the 
 Didache and the localized episcopate which already 
 existed probably in every town-church of Greece by 
 the middle of the century. 
 
 1 On the position of Ignatius in Syria see ad Rom. 2 '. rov fnia-Kowov Svpi'as 
 icaTT)f uocrei' 6 flebs evpeOiji'ai eis &v<rt.v, airb avaToAirjs /iTajre^n/(ajtevos. He also speaks 
 of himself as representing 'the Church in Syria' (ad Eph. 21, ad Magn. i4 
 ad Rom. 9, ad Trail. 13) as well as the Church in Antioch of Syria (ad Philad. 10, 
 ad Smyrn. n, ad Polyc. 7). Perhaps by ' Syria ' would be meant only what after 
 Hadrian's division was called Syria Coele or Magna Syria : see Diet. Gr. and Rom. 
 Geogr. s.v. SYRIA. Dr. Lightfoot says (i. p. 383) : ' Of a diocese, properly so called, 
 there is no trace. . . . The bishops and presbyters are the ministry of a city, not of 
 a diocese. What provision may have been made for the rural districts we are not 
 told.' The suggestion above is that there was originally a ministry-in-chief un- 
 localized, and that only gradually was a representative of this ministry localized in 
 every Church with the name of ' bishop.' There is however no evidence against the 
 bishop of a city having had from the first the supervision of the Christians in the 
 surrounding district, until chorepiscopi were appointed. 
 
 2 See Eusebius' expression, H. E. v. 23 wapoiKuu. Kara raAAiav as Eiprjvaios 
 eVeo-ico'irei. (The same expression however is used in the previous chapter of the 
 different ' parishes ' of Alexandria in the more modern sense ; see App. Note B.) 
 In the fourth century we know there was only one bishop in Scythia, and this was 
 regarded as traditional ; see Sozomen H. E. vi. 21 : TOUTO TO eflvos jroAAas fikv x el 
 KOI iroAeis al icw/xas icai (Jpov'pta' /njTpoTroAts Se' e<rrc To/oils, JroAis fieyaArj ai 
 fvSaifJuav, wapaAios . . ei<re'Ti fie K<U vvv e0os TraAaibi' fvQaSe Kparet TOU iravros 
 iOvovs iva ras efcxATjtn'as ejnaxoTreip . 
 
 3 Thessalonica is reported by Origen to have had Gaius (Rom. xvi. 27) for its 
 first bishop.
 
 300 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 VI 
 
 vi. The It only remains for us to consider the evidence of 
 
 of^Hermas. the Shepherd. This document is one of those in the 
 its date. case of which the internal evidence of date is in con- 
 flict with the external. For, on the one hand, all 
 that Hermas says about the Christian ministry sug- 
 gests such an early date as accords naturally with a 
 mention of Clement presumably the well-known 
 Clement as the person in the Roman Church whose 
 duty it was to send to other cities the visions vouch- 
 safed to Hermas. On the other hand, we have 
 positive information from a contemporary that 
 Hermas wrote the Shepherd at a period which 
 cannot be earlier than A.D. I4O. 1 
 
 What then are the hints given us by Hermas as to 
 the condition of the ministry ? 
 
 its language 0) ^ e speaks of ' the presbyters who preside over 
 
 mlnktry ^ Church,' and these must no doubt be identified 
 
 with the occupants of the ' chief seat ' whom he 
 
 1 The Muratorian fragment asserts : ' Pastorem vero nuperrime temporibus nostris 
 in urbe Roma Hermas conscripsit, sedente cathedra urbis Romae ecclesiae Pio 
 episcopo fratre eius.' This is too definite a statement by a contemporary for us to 
 reject. But, accepting it, what are we to make of the reference in the Shtpficrd to 
 a Clement whose duty it is to send Hermas' visions to foreign Churches (Vis, ii. 4)? 
 It is, I think (following Dr. Salmon), impossible that the brother of Pius (who 
 acceded, according to Lipsius, not before A.D. 140), writing apparently during his 
 episcopate, can refer, as he does, to Clement the bishop as his contemporary at a 
 time when he was himself a married man with a family (Vis. \. 3, ii. 3). Salmon 
 rejects the statement of the fragment, but this seems very arbitrary. There remain 
 only two alternatives, either to suppose (what is improbable) that the Clement 
 referred to is another Clement and his office not the bishopric, or to suppose that 
 Hermas is (for some reason) using Clement's name as a symbol. So Origen treats 
 the names here (Grapte, Clement, Hermas) as allegorical; see de Princip. iv. ii. 
 But this again is improbable. The uncertainty as to date renders the use of this 
 writing difficult. The matter is discussed by Lightfoot Dissert, p. 16, and Salmon 
 Introd. p. 571 f.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in tfie Subapostolic Age. 301 
 
 mentions elsewhere. 1 The ' chief seat ' is elsewhere 
 spoken of as an object of ambition to false prophets 
 and others. 2 We also hear of deacons who abused 
 their diaconate to make money, plundering widows 
 and orphans. 3 So far then the government of the 
 Church of Rome appears to be a government of 
 presbyters, assisted by deacons in the administration 
 of alms. 
 
 (2) We have also mention of church ' rulers,' and 
 these in another passage are unmistakably distin- 
 guished, as in Clement's letter, from the occupants 
 of the 'chief seat.' 4 So far the phenomena are 
 exactly the same as those presented by Clement's 
 letter. 
 
 (3) Thirdly, we have mention of 'apostles and 
 teachers who preached over the whole world and who 
 taught with gravity and purity the word of the 
 Lord.' Both are spoken of as having ' received the 
 Holy Ghost,' and both belong to the past generation. 6 
 Here again there is no difficulty. 
 
 (4) There is mention also of ' bishops ' who exer- in spite of 
 
 ambiguities 
 
 1 Vis. ii. 4 : ypaifreis elf 6vo 0iAaptSia, ical ire/Ai^ets ev KATJ/wm KOJ. iv rpairrjj. 
 nefj.\iiei ovv KAijpi); eis Tas efw iro'Aeis, exetVw yap eTriTeVpajrTaf Tpairnj ie 
 youflenjcret ras x^P a S * a ' TOUS opfyavovs' <rv Se avayvtioT) eis Tatinjf TTJV m\iv jiera 
 nil' jrpecrjSvTepaji' riav irpoi<rrafj.fviav TTJS jcAT)o*tas. (There is nothing to indicate 
 Clement's relation to the presbyters.) Cf. Vis. iii. 9, 7 : vfuv Xe'yu TOIS Trpoijyov- 
 fieVoi? r^s eticXi7<7ias icoi TOIS irpwroKafleSpiVous. 
 
 2 Mand. xi. 12 : 6 So/fiav jrvevjia x et> ' v^foi tavrov icat Se'Aet irpwroKajBeSpiav f\nv. 
 Cf. Sim. viii. 7. 4. In the-SVk/A^rrfthe prophet has no official dignity in the Church, 
 see App. Note I. 
 
 3 Sim. ix. 26. 2. In 15. 4 we read of irpo<>}Tai TOU Oeov KOU. Sidtcovoi. avrov. Here 
 the word is probably used in a general sense. 
 
 * Vis. ii. 2. 6 : epeis ovv TOIS Trporjyov/itVois TTJS e(CKX7)<rt'os. Cf. iii, 9. 7 : VJIM> Xeyw 
 TOIS wporryovfitVois T^S eKAcArjo-i'as ical TOIS irpajTO<ca8e8piTcus. 
 
 5 ^:t . ix. 25. 2. The apostles are distinguished from the teachers (Sim. ix. 16. 5 
 oi airooToAot jcai 01 6toa<r<aAoi) and are mentioned alone (Sim. ix. 17. i : they were 
 the preachers to ' the twelve tribes who inhabit the whole world,' and are therefore 
 presumably reckoned as twelve). But both apostles and teachers belong to the 
 past generation and were the -original proclaimers of the gospel (Sim. ix. 15. 4). 
 Together they are symbolized under forty stones in the fabric of the tower which is 
 the Church .
 
 302 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 cised hospitality and protected the desolate and the 
 widows, 1 and in another place a list is given of the 
 worthies of the church ministry, past and present, as 
 follows : ' Apostles and bishops and teachers and 
 deacons, who walked according to the gravity of 
 God and exercised their episcopate and taught and 
 ministered with purity and gravity to the elect of 
 God.' z Now if these visions were seen and written 
 down in the days of Clement we should naturally 
 identify the ' bishops ' with the ' presbyters who pre- 
 side,' and suppose that the 'teachers' are inserted 
 out of place or perhaps that the ' bishops ' are called 
 'teachers' also, like the 'pastors' (i.e. presbyter- 
 bishops) of Eph. iv. ii. On the other hand, if, as we 
 are almost forced to believe, the writing dates from 
 the days of Pius, we can hardly do otherwise than 
 interpret bishops in the later sense and suppose that 
 the ' teachers ' are the presbyters here, to which 
 again the passage of St. Paul just referred to would 
 be a parallel. In this case we should naturally 
 identify the ' bishops ' with the ' rulers,' and should 
 suppose that in the interval since Clement's Epistle 
 these rulers had become localized in the different 
 churches as bishops and, though as such they would 
 have sat among the presbyters on the ' chief seat ' 
 and been reckoned among them, they still can be 
 classed apart as a separate order and spoken of 
 either by the title of ' bishop,' which belonged to 
 their local presidency, or by their general name of 
 ' rulers.' 
 
 In any case it seems clear that this document adds 
 considerably to the force of the argument derived 
 from Clement's language, that even when the pres- 
 
 1 Sim. Ix. 27. 2 : 7riV<coiroi KOJ, $i\6evot, oirivet riSettt et? Toi>? OIKOU? cavrwf 
 irairorc v7re5e'fai/TO TOVS SoiiAous TOU fleou arep vmucpiVsuf ot Se eiriVicojroi (c.T.X. 
 
 2 Vis. iii. 5. i.
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 303 
 
 byters were the chief local authorities they were still 
 in subordination to 'rulers,' who represented, since 
 the apostles and teachers had passed away, the chief 
 authority in the Church. 
 
 In summing up the results derived from a con- f h u 
 sideration of the historical links which in the Western 
 Church connect the age of the Apostles with that of 
 Irenaeus, there are two theories which require notice 
 besides the one which we have been led to adopt 
 
 There is the view (which is undoubtedly supported ^jj 
 by the Epistle of Polycarp, taken alone) that the ,^ ua 
 Churches in the West were governed simply by a pr^byt 
 
 tr J J bishops 
 
 council of presbyters, who had no superiors over 
 them, and who therefore must be supposed to have 
 handed on their own ministry. There is no objection 
 on ground of principle to this conclusion viewed in 
 the light of the apostolic succession, as has been 
 sufficiently explained already. These presbyter- 
 bishops legitimately 'ordained' and fulfilled episcopal 
 functions because those functions belonged to the 
 equal commission they had all received. But later 
 under the teachings of experience this full commis- 
 sion was confined to one ' bishop,' and the rest 
 received the reduced authority which belongs to the 
 presby terate of later church history. Such a process 
 would not represent the elevation of any new dignity 
 from below but the limitation of an old dignity to 
 one instead of its extension to many, and that in 
 accordance with the precedent set by the Apostle 
 St. John. ' Monepiscopacy ' takes the place of a 
 diffused episcopacy. 1 It has however been pointed 
 out that this supposition does not satisfy all the 
 evidence of Clement's letter or of the Shepherd. It 
 
 1 So Dr. Langen states the principle GescA. der rffm, Kirche i. p. 95, and Light- 
 foot (Jgnat. \. p. 376 n. 1 ) expresses agreement with him.
 
 304 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 should also be added that it makes the strong 
 tradition of the monepiscopal succession which meets 
 us in the latter part of the second century, and the 
 undisputed supremacy of the single bishop, almost 
 unintelligible. 
 
 (ii)the Secondly, there is a view based on the considera- 
 
 hidden in tion tnat long after the existence of bishops in every 
 terateT by ~ Church, as distinct from presbyters, the term presbyter 
 could still be used for both orders, as it is occasionally 
 by Irenaeus and Clement and Origen. Consequently 
 it is maintainable that in the Church of Clement's 
 day and of Polycarp's, at Corinth and at Philippi, 
 there existed one amongst the presbyters who, 
 though he held the unique powers which afterwards 
 belonged to the episcopate, was still included under 
 the common name. 1 While however this view can- 
 not be disproved, it must be admitted that it is un- 
 supported by the evidence of the documents we have 
 been considering. 
 
 (HO the The conclusion which on the whole we have been 
 
 forali^tion led to form is that in the West no more than in the 
 men-the hc East did the supreme power ever devolve upon the 
 ported" view, presbyters. There was a time when they were in 
 many places (as for instance at Corinth and Philippi) 
 the chief local authorities the sole ordinary occu- 
 pants of the chief seat. But over them, not yet 
 localized, were men either of prophetic inspiration 
 or of apostolic authority and known character 
 'prophets' or 'teachers' or 'evangelists' or 'rulers' 
 who in the subapostolic age ordained to the sacred 
 ministry and in certain cases would have exercised 
 the chief teaching and governing authority. Gradually 
 
 1 Dr. Salmon writes (Introd. p. 568) : ' It has been thought that although Clement's 
 letter exhibits the prominence of a single person as chief in the Church of Rome, it 
 affords evidence that there was no such prominence in the Church of Corinth. . . . 
 But this inference is not warranted.'
 
 VI.] The Ministry in the Subapostolic Age. 305 
 
 these men, after the pattern set by James in Jeru- 
 salem or by John in the Churches of Asia, became 
 themselves local presidents or instituted others in 
 their place. Thus a transition was effected to a 
 state of things in which every Church had its local 
 president, who ranked amongst the presbytery a 
 fellow-presbyter, like St. Peter sitting with them on 
 the chief seat, but to whom was assigned exclusively 
 the name of ' bishop.' This transference and limita- 
 tion of a name can hardly be a difficulty when we 
 remember the vague use of official titles which meets 
 us in early church history. In the organization, as 
 in the theology, of the Church nomenclature was 
 only gradually fixed. 1 The view here expressed of 
 the development of the ministry has one great ad- 
 vantage, besides appearing to account for all the 
 phenomena of the documents of the period : it 
 accounts also for the strength of the tradition which 
 gave authority to the episcopal successions when they 
 first come into clear view, and for the unquestioned 
 position which they held. 2 There is no trace of 
 elevation in the records of the episcopate. 
 
 1 Cf. Theodoret on i Tim. iii. i : TOVS avrovs eKaAovv wore irpr/3vTe0ou *al 
 iri<ricdrovs, TOUS Se vvv KaAovjuepout eirio-Ko'irous ajrooroAovs iivofta^ov row Se \povav 
 irpo'iovTOS, TO /xev TTJS airooroAijs ovofia TOIS aATjffws airooroXois KO.Tf\iirov, Tr/v 6e nrj 
 fjj-io-icojrijs irpo<n)yopuiv TOIS TraAai xaAovpcVoif aTrooroAois iire.Oe<Ta.v. The idea 
 that bishops were at first called apostles is derived from Theodore Mops, on i Tim. 
 iii. 8. There is no early evidence to support it, though there were ' apostles ' besides 
 the twelve. In other respects, however, Theodore's account of the development of 
 the ministry is very interesting. Timothy and Titus represent, he thinks, a class of 
 subapostolic church rulers, who were put in charge of ' eparchies ' or large districts, 
 and held the supreme control with the authority to ordain, while the local churches 
 were ruled by presbyter-bishops : afterwards the increase in the number of the 
 faithful led to the multiplication of the chief rulers, and their unwillingness to equal 
 themselves to the Apostles, to their adoption of the name of bishops : in later days 
 the episcopate, especially in the East, had come to be unduly multiplied. See Swete 
 Theodore of Mops, on the Minor Epp. of St. Paul, ii. pp. 118-125. 
 
 2 We should still have to acknowledge a little idealizing in Tertullian's statement 
 that the local episcopate at Corinth and Fhilippi was of apostolic institution. See 
 de Praescr. 36. 
 
 u
 
 CHAPTER VII 
 
 CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATIONS 
 
 THE task which remains for us is that of endeavour- 
 ing to sum up the conclusions of a long investigation. 
 The verdict It appeared first of all that the record of history 
 the church ; renders it practically indisputable that Jesus Christ 
 founded a visible society or Church, to be the organ 
 of His Spirit in the world, the depository of His 
 truth, the covenanted sphere of His redemptive grace 
 and discipline. Now such a society, as by its very 
 nature it is to be universal and continuous, must have 
 links of connection ; and in the uninterrupted history 
 of the Church, as it is spread out before us from the 
 latter part of the second century, one such link has 
 always existed in the apostolic successions of the 
 the apostolic ministry. 1 It appeared further that these successions 
 
 succession: 111 i , , 
 
 have been regarded by the church writers, with an 
 unanimity and to an extent which hardly admit of 
 being exaggerated, as an essential element of her 
 sacerdotal- corporate life. Of course an essential ministry is a 
 sacerdotal conception. Accordingly reasons have 
 been given for believing that ideas now current as to 
 
 1 On the fundamental principle of the ministry I should like to take this last 
 opportunity of referring to the Thcologia Naturalis of Raymund of Sabunde, a very 
 interesting theologian of the fifteenth century ; cf. tit 303 : ' quia vita spiritualis 
 consistit in charitate et unitate, ideo convenientissime debuit ordinari, ut homines 
 vice Christi administrent sacramenta salutis hominibus, ut magis fierent unum 
 inter se.' 
 
 306 
 
 ism
 
 VII.] Conclusions and Applications. 307 
 
 the growth of sacerdotalism in the early centuries are 
 greatly exaggerated. Undoubtedly there has been 
 a certain growth and development in this respect, 
 and the causes of it are not far to seek. The 
 ministry existed in order to govern, and the lawless- 
 ness which made government necessary made the 
 assertion of its authority more emphatic. Again, 
 and this is a point on which it is worth while to lay 
 a good deal of emphasis, the growing secularity of 
 the Church, consequent upon the popular acceptance 
 of the Christian religion becoming increasingly easy, 
 led inevitably to stress being laid, where there was 
 special need and opportunity to lay it, upon the 
 sanctity requisite for the clergy in their ministerial 
 relation to God. Thus, no doubt, the gulf broadened 
 between the clergy and laity ; for, as that gulf is 
 narrowest where the general level of Christian life 
 and aspiration is highest, so the lowering of the 
 average tone tends to the isolation of the priesthood 
 of the ministry. Thus it would be impossible to 
 deny a growth in the sacerdotal conceptions of the 
 Church, but it is a growth which (as has been said) 
 is very easily exaggerated. At least there antedated 
 it the belief (which appears in the latter part of the 
 second century with all the force of an immemorial 
 tradition) that a ministry of bishops, priests, and 
 deacons of apostolic descent and divine authorization 
 is the centre of unity in each local Christian society, 
 and is charged with the administration of that 
 worship and discipline, and with the guardianship of 
 that doctrine, which belong to the whole Church. 
 The chief authority lay with the bishop, and accord- 
 ingly episcopal ordination was regarded without a 
 single exception which can be alleged on reasonable
 
 308 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 grounds as essential to constitute a man a member 
 of the clergy and give him ministerial commission. 
 Thus what is commonly understood to be meant by 
 the doctrine of the apostolic succession was a 
 commonplace among Christian ideas, and was bound 
 up with the whole fabric of the life of the catholic 
 Church. Nor would this position be affected if we 
 were to accept Jerome's testimony though grave 
 reasons were shown against accepting it to the 
 effect that in the early Church of Alexandria on the 
 vacancy of the see, one of the presbyters succeeded 
 to the episcopate after mere election by his fellows. 
 This would only mean that the Alexandrian pres- 
 byters were by the terms of their ordination bishops 
 in posse, even though their exercise of episcopal 
 powers without special election would have been 
 irregular and would not therefore, according to 
 current teaching, have been accepted as valid. It 
 would not mean it was not understood by Jerome 
 to mean that a presbyter, who had been ordained 
 without any special conditions attached to his charge, 
 could advance himself under any circumstances to 
 episcopal functions. This supposed arrangement 
 would not, therefore, have touched the principle of 
 the succession, viz. that no ecclesiastical ministry 
 can be validly exercised except such as is covered 
 by a clearly understood commission, received in the 
 regular devolution of ecclesiastical authority. 
 
 Was, then, this position which the Church took up 
 about her orders justified by the original intentions 
 of her Founder and His Apostles? 
 
 The witness 1 answer to this we were led to see that, however 
 
 Gospels; much ambiguity might attach to the record of the 
 
 four Gospels if they were isolated documents, they
 
 VII.] Conclusions and Applications. 309 
 
 certainly appear to warrant, if not to require, the 
 position that Christ instituted in His Church a per- 
 manent and official apostolate. 
 
 Further the early records of the apostolic age the apostolic 
 present us with a picture of the Church governed 
 by such an apostolate, invested without any doubt 
 with a supernatural authority. As the Church grows, 
 a local ministry of presbyter-bishops and deacons is 
 developed in the different Churches. These local 
 officers appear as sharing the apostolic ministry, 
 though in subordinate grades, and as instituted by 
 apostolic authority. It is only by giving the evidence 
 of the Didache an importance denied to that of the 
 Pastoral Epistles, the Acts of the Apostles, and 
 Clement's Epistle, that the idea of a ministry elected 
 simply by the congregation can find any countenance, 
 and though the Didache taken by itself would admit 
 of this interpretation it does not require it. At the 
 period then represented by the Pastoral Epistles 
 when the Apostle St. Paul is writing especially about 
 church organization and in view of the future the 
 church ministry consisted of presbyter-bishops and 
 deacons, controlled by the superior authority of 
 apostles and apostolic men. 
 
 Earlier the rich miraculous endowments of the 
 Church endowments which witnessed to the reality 
 of the Spirit's presence, which was ministered by 
 apostolic hands had more or less thrown into the 
 background the more normal and permanent ' gift of 
 government ' : but at every stage the Church is pre- 
 sented to us as an elaborate organization in which 
 every member has his own position and function by 
 divine appointment.' It is certain that miraculous 
 indications of the divine will in regard to any
 
 3io Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 particular person would have rendered official ap- 
 pointment in accordance with such indications a very 
 subordinate matter ; but the force to be attributed 
 to miraculous qualifications recognised by the com- 
 munity is not a practical question in reference to the 
 later church ministry, nor did it appear probable 
 that even such qualifications were allowed (in the 
 case for instance of those prophets and teachers who 
 shared the apostolic authority) to dispense with an 
 appointment to office received either directly from 
 Christ or from His Apostles. 
 
 The question then arose : What are the links of 
 connection between the apostolic ministry as it is 
 presented to us in the Pastoral Epistles and the 
 ministry of bishops, priests, and deacons as it appears 
 in church history ? In particular do the single 
 bishops in each community represent simply a 
 localization of the authority of apostles, prophets, 
 and teachers, which had been catholic or general, 
 while the title 'bishop' was transferred from the 
 lower to the higher grade of office : or was it the case 
 that such apostolic authority as was needed for the 
 permanent government of the Church passed first to 
 the local colleges of equal presbyter-bishops, and 
 that after a time the general governing authority 
 was confined to one only who was called ' bishop ' by 
 a limitation of the term the rest receiving the 
 reduced commission of presbyters ? 
 
 In answer to this question it appeared that the 
 latter hypothesis can indeed be defended in the case 
 of certain parts of the Church, especially on the 
 evidence of the Epistle of Polycarp and Jerome's 
 statements about the Church of Alexandria, and that 
 it is a hypothesis which in view of its common
 
 VII.] Conclusions and Applications. 311 
 
 reception in the West it would be impossible to con- 
 demn as if it contradicted the principle of the 
 apostolic succession : but it appeared also that the 
 former alternative is by far the more probable. It 
 has on its side the evidence of the history of the 
 ministry in Palestine, Syria, and Asia ; and, on 
 closer inspection, the evidence which the Epistle of 
 Clement gives us as to the development of the Church 
 at Rome and Corinth, while it is not incompatible 
 with the witness of Polycarp's letter. Thus the 
 presbyters seem never to have held the powers later 
 known as episcopal ; but as Church after Church 
 gained a local representative of apostolic authority, 
 the title of bishop was very naturally confined in its 
 use to distinguish this ' successor of the Apostles ' 
 among the local ' presbyters/ with whom he was 
 associated. 
 
 It is, however, necessary to emphasize once again 
 that there is considerable room for uncertainty as to 
 the exact steps by which in this place or that the 
 apostolic ministry passed into the ordinary ministry 
 of the Church. But there are matters of much more 
 importance as to which there is no such uncer- 
 tainty : 
 
 (1) The ministry advanced always upon the prin- 
 ciple of succession, so that whatever functions a man 
 held in the Church at any time were simply those 
 that had been committed to him by some one 
 among his predecessors who had held the authority 
 to 'give orders' by regular devolution from the 
 Apostles. 
 
 (2) ' It was by a common instinct that this [the 
 threefold or episcopal] organization was everywhere 
 adopted. It was as it were a law of the being of the
 
 312 
 
 Christian Ministry. 
 
 [CHAP. 
 
 The doctrine 
 of apostolic 
 succession 
 alone satis-] 
 fies all the 
 evidence. 
 
 Application 
 of the 
 principle 
 
 Church that it should put on this form, which worked 
 as surely as the growth of a particular kind of plant 
 from a particular kind of seed. Everywhere there 
 was a development which made unerringly for the 
 same goal. This seems to speak of divine institu- 
 tion almost as plainly as if our Lord had in so many 
 words prescribed this form of church government. 
 He, the founder, the creator of the Church, would 
 seem to have impressed upon it this nature.' 1 
 
 Mr. Darwin, writing about his theory of the pro- 
 cess of evolution in nature, uses these words : ' I 
 fully admit that there are very many difficulties not 
 satisfactorily explained by my theory of descent with 
 modification, but I cannot possibly believe that a 
 false theory would explain so many classes of facts 
 as I think it certainly does explain. On these 
 grounds I drop my anchor, and believe that the 
 difficulties will slowly disappear.' 2 It is interesting 
 to notice what grounds of evidence a great scientific 
 teacher thinks adequate to support a far-reaching 
 doctrine : and it is impossible not to perceive what 
 infinitely higher grounds we have for our theory of 
 the apostolic succession. It not only ' explains many 
 classes of facts,' but it, and it only (though of course 
 the cogency of the positive evidence for it is different 
 at different stages), appears to explain all the pheno- 
 mena of the Christian ministry from the beginning. 
 We, then, have better cause to ' drop our anchor.' 
 
 It is not proposed to carry very far the application 
 of the principles which have been enunciated and 
 
 1 Stanton Christian Ministry Historically Considered in Lectures on Church 
 Doctrine, series iii, pp. 16, 17, I have altered the tenses to adapt the quotation to 
 the context, but with no change of sense. 
 
 2 Life and Letters of Charles Darwin ii. p. 217. Cf. p. 286 : ' it seems to me 
 that an hypothesis is developed into a theory solely by explaining an ample lot 
 of facts.'
 
 vii.] Conclusions and Applications. 313 
 
 defended in this book. It is not for instance proposed 
 to discuss whether such and such Churches or reli- 
 gious bodies which call themselves episcopal have 
 really the historical succession, nor on the other hand 
 to investigate the theories of ordination, more or 
 less subversive, which have been current since the 
 Reformation. But it will appear at once as a conse- 
 quence of all this argument that the various presby- 
 terian and congregationalist organizations, however mi 
 venerable on many and different grounds, have, in 
 dispensing with the episcopal successions, violated a 
 fundamental law of the Church's life. It cannot be 
 maintained that the acts of ordination, by which 
 presbyters of the sixteenth or subsequent centuries 
 originated the ministries of some of these societies, 
 were covered by their commission or belonged to 
 the office of presbyter which they had duly received. 
 Beyond all question they ' took to themselves ' these 
 powers of ordination, and consequently had them 
 not. It is not proved nay, it is not perhaps even 
 probable that any presbyter had in any age the 
 power to ordain. But it is absolutely certain that for 
 a large number of centuries it had been understood 
 beyond all question that only bishops could ordain 
 and that presbyters had not episcopal powers ; and 
 no exceptional dignity, belonging to any presbyter- 
 abbot had ever enabled him to transcend the limits 
 of his office. It follows then not that God's grace 
 has not worked, and worked largely, through many 
 an irregular ministry where it was exercised or used 
 in good faith but that a ministry not episcopally 
 received is invalid, that is to say, falls outside the 
 conditions of covenanted security and cannot justify 
 its existence in terms of the covenant.
 
 314 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 This conclusion once accepted has of course an 
 immediate bearing on the obligations of individuals 
 who may find themselves members of presbyterian or 
 congregationalist bodies ; but it has also another and 
 more general bearing on the relation of large com- 
 munities of Christians to the properly constituted 
 (the bearing Church. How can you suppose, they indignantly 
 present ask, that we can accept conclusions which would 
 falsify the prolonged experience we have had in our 
 Churches of the systematic action of the grace of 
 God ? The answer to such pleading is surely this. 
 We do not ask you to deny any spiritual experience 
 of the past or the present. The blame for separations 
 lies, on any fair showing, quite sufficiently with the 
 Church to make it intelligible that God should have 
 let the action of His grace extend itself widely and 
 freely beyond its covenanted channels. We ask you 
 then to be false to no part of experience but rather 
 to be more completely true to experience in all its 
 aspects. For must you not admit that viewed on the 
 whole the results of our divisions have been dis- 
 astrous ; that the present state of Christendom is 
 intolerable? Let me quote the very serious words 
 of an eminent presbyterian theologian : l 
 
 1 If it be the duty of the Church to represent her Lord among men, 
 and if she faithfully performs that duty, it follows by an absolutely 
 irresistible necessity that the unity exhibited in His person must appear 
 in her. She must not only be one, but visibly one in some distinct 
 and appreciable sense in such a sense that men shall not need to be 
 told of it, but shall themselves see and acknowledge that her unity is 
 real. No doubt such unity may be, and is, consistent with great 
 variety with variety in the dogmatic expression of Christian truth, in 
 regulations for Christian government, in forms of Christian worship, 
 and in the exhibition of Christian life. It is unnecessary to speak of 
 these things now. Variety and the right to differ have many advocates. 
 
 1 Dr. Milligan Resurrection of our Lord pp. 199-202.
 
 VII.] Conclusions and Applications. 315 
 
 We have rather at present to think of unity and the obligation to agree. 
 As regards these, it can hardly be denied that the Church of our time 
 is flagrantly and disastrously at fault. The spectacle presented by her 
 to the world is in direct and palpable contradiction to the unity of the 
 person of her Lord ; and she would at once discover its sinfulness were 
 she not too exclusively occupied with the thought of positive action 
 on the world, instead of remembering that her primary and most 
 important duty is to afford to the world a visible representation of her 
 Exalted Head. In all her branches, indeed, the beauty of unity is 
 enthusiastically talked of by her members, and not a few are never 
 weary of describing the precious ointment in which the Psalmist beheld 
 a symbol of the unity of Israel. Others, again, alive to the uselessness 
 of talking where there is no corresponding reality, seek comfort in the 
 thought that beneath all the divisions of the Church there is a unity 
 which she did not make, and which she cannot unmake. Yet, surely, 
 in the light of the truth now before us, we may well ask whether either 
 the talking or the suggested comfort brings us nearer a solution of our 
 difficulties. The one is so meaningless that the very lips which utter 
 it might be expected to refuse their office. The other is true, although, 
 according as it is used, it may either be a stimulus to amendment or a 
 pious platitude ; and generally it is the latter. But neither words 
 about the beauty of unity, nor the fact of an invisible unity, avail to 
 help us. What the Church ought to possess is a unity which the eye 
 can see. If she is to be a witness to her Risen Lord, she must do 
 more than talk of unity, more than console herself with the hope that 
 the world will not forget the invisible bond by which it is pled that all 
 her members are bound together into one. Visible unity in one form 
 or another is an essential mark of her faithfulness. . . . The world 
 will never be converted by a disunited Church. Even Bible circulation 
 and missionary exertion upon the largest scale will be powerless to 
 convert it, unless they are accompanied by the strength which unity 
 alone can give. Let the Church of Christ once feel, in any measure 
 corresponding to its importance, that she is the representative of the 
 Risen Lord, and she will no longer be satisfied with mere outward 
 action. She will see that her first and most imperative duty is to heal 
 herself, that she may be able to heal others also. ' 
 
 This is strong pleading. And, if it be the case 
 that we are bound to seek organic unity ; if it be the 
 case that the results of our past divisions, of our past 
 individualism, are such as to satisfy us that there has 
 been something fundamentally wrong about current
 
 3 16 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 conceptions of Christian liberty and Christian pro- 
 gress ; if further it be the case that new moral and 
 doctrinal perils, consequent upon the collapse of 
 Christian discipline and accompanied with the ' shak- 
 ing ' of established institutions in all directions, are 
 constantly pressing upon us the obligation to consider 
 afresh the basis of Christian life and order, all this 
 coincides to give new force and meaning to the claims 
 of the apostolic succession. 
 
 For it alone, embodying as it does the principle of 
 the historical continuity of the Church, affords a 
 possible basis of union : it alone, while on the one 
 hand it cannot possibly be abandoned, and while the 
 Churches which possess it cannot be asked l (if there 
 be anything in this argument) to regard it as simply 
 one of many permissible forms of church govern- 
 ment, on the other hand is not, when taken in its 
 true breadth and in all its possibilities of application, 
 open to objection as if it were itself inadequate or 
 unsatisfactory. 2 
 
 Ip^opaf " Nor is it the case that in this matter the Anglican 
 
 thd/true to Church is simply asking for a cause to be decided all 
 
 principles. h er own wa y ; f or s he has herself to say nothing of 
 
 other portions of the Church much to do to recall 
 
 herself to her true principles. God's promise to Judah 
 
 was that she should remember her ways and be 
 
 ashamed, when she should receive her sisters Samaria 
 
 and Sodom : and that He would give them her ' for 
 
 daughters, but not by her covenant ' 3 : and certainly, 
 
 if it were granted to the English Church to become 
 
 1 As Dr. Milligan would I suppose ask them. Some words imply this, in the 
 context from which I have quoted. 
 
 2 I had occasion to point out before that episcopacy is a much wider principle 
 than has sometimes been supposed by both its friends and its enemies, see p. 65 f. 
 
 * Ezek. xvi. 61.
 
 VII.] Conclusions and Applications. 317 
 
 a centre for the reunion of separated communities on 
 the basis of the apostolic succession, the words ' not 
 by her covenant' would need to be brought to 
 memory. 
 
 To take only one example of this out of several 
 which suggest themselves. The principle of the 
 apostolic succession involves the truth that the bishops 
 of the catholic Church are clothed with a spiritual 
 authority, and a corresponding responsibility, as the 
 guardians of Christian truth and worship and discip- 
 line, an authority and a responsibility which they 
 cannot alienate from themselves, or commit to the 
 secular government, without treason to their great 
 Head. God in fact has instituted two kinds of 
 societies in the world coincident but distinct the 
 ministers of each representing His authority in their 
 own sphere : indeed in one aspect the record of 
 Christian history is the record of the divine over- 
 ruling of various attempts on the part of one of these 
 two authorities to deny to the other its independent 
 existence. The early Christian Church recognised 
 without hesitation that 'the powers that be are 
 ordained of God,' but on the other hand the secular 
 power alarmed at the growth of the new spiritual 
 society the imperium in imperio endeavoured to 
 crush out the Church. At a later epoch, when the 
 balance of powers had changed, the great writers of 
 the middle age acknowledged side by side the Holy 
 Church and the Holy Empire, but in the climax of 
 its might the papacy would not be satisfied with less 
 than the annihilation of the independence of the 
 State. Once more and for the last time, an attempt 
 was made which is specially identified with the his- 
 tory of the English Church and race, so to emphasize
 
 3i8 Christian Ministry. [CHAP. 
 
 the idea of a Christianized nation, that Church and 
 State could be regarded as only different aspects 
 of the same society. On the basis of such a theory, 
 if the State pledged itself to the Church's faith, the 
 Church on her side might be content to merge her 
 independent governmental authority in that of the 
 State. 
 
 The logic of events falsified in turn each of these 
 attempts to fuse the distinct spheres of ' the two 
 empires.' If circumstances have made it absurd in 
 England now to speak of the nation as committed 
 to the catholic faith or of her national courts as 
 'spiritual,' 1 then circumstances have taught us also 
 how dangerous it was for the Church to go even as 
 far as she did, in alienating her power of indepen- 
 dent action. In the future she must be content to 
 first of all act as part and parcel of the catholic 
 Church, ruled by her laws, empowered by her Spirit. 
 And, if the bishops are to make an intelligible claim, 
 they must make it as the responsible guardians by 
 Christ's appointment and apostolic succession of the 
 doctrine and discipline and worship of the Church 
 catholic, ready to maintain, at all cost, the inherent 
 spiritual independence which belongs to their office. 
 
 If then this be the case, the English Church has to 
 learn as well as to teach to recover a principle as 
 well as to maintain it. For it admits of no question 
 that, for instance, the Established Church in Scot- 
 land, though it is presbyterian, has maintained more 
 successfully than the Church of England with her 
 catholic succession the spiritual independence of 
 
 1 As Hooker pleaded (E. P. viii. 8. 9) : ' If the cause be spiritual, secular courts 
 do not meddle with it : we need not excuse ourselves with Ambrose, but boldly and 
 lawfully we may refuse to answer before any civil judge in a matter which is not 
 civil, so that we do not mistake the nature either of the cause or of the court."
 
 VII.] Conclusions and Applications. 319 
 
 Christ's society. 1 We have to learn, then, as well as 
 to teach. 
 
 But the object of this book was only to maintain 
 a principle ; and I should desire to have left before 
 the minds of my readers the picture of a universal 
 spiritual society, in which the apostolic succession of 
 the bishops constitutes by divine appointment a 
 visible link between different epochs, witnessing 
 everywhere to that permanent element in human 
 nature to which Christ's Gospel appeals, that funda- 
 mental humanity, underlying all developments and 
 variations, in virtue of which there becomes possible 
 a real spiritual continuity between the generations, 
 so that 'the heart of the fathers is turned to the 
 children and the heart of the children to the fathers, 
 lest God come and smite the earth with a curse.' 
 
 1 See the remarkable decisions of the Judges of the Court of Session quoted in the 
 Report of the Royal Commission on Ecclesiastical Courts, 1883, vol. ii. p. 46.
 
 APPENDED NOTES. 
 
 A. 
 
 DR. LIGHTFOOT'S DISSERTATION ON 
 'THE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY.' 1 
 
 THE Church at large owes Dr. Lightfoot a debt of gratitude so 
 (in the strictest sense of the term) incalculable I do not say as Bishop 
 of Durham, for that consideration would be out of place here, but as 
 an historical critic of the very first order, as a defender of the faith, 
 and as an interpreter of St. Paul and, more than this, any would-be 
 vindicator of the Christian ministry owes so great a debt to the scholar 
 who has again set almost beyond the reach of cavil the genuineness 
 of the Ignatian Epistles, that, in venturing to say a word in criticism 
 of what he has written and confirmed with his mature approval, 2 one 
 runs a great risk of incurring the charge both of arrogance and of 
 ingratitude. 
 
 Yet there is no doubt that the Essay named above has caused a great 
 deal of disquiet and confusion : it has been found an effective instrument 
 in defence of 'Congregational principles' by their ablest advocate*: 
 and, though all this may have been due in most part, as Dr. Lightfoot 
 says, to its ' partial and qualifying statements ' being ' emphasized to 
 the neglect of the general drift of the Essay,' 4 it does seem to justify 
 such misinterpretations (if I may so speak) by the great ambiguity of 
 the position which it takes up. 
 
 This has recently been made all the more apparent by a statement 
 of the author, that he recognises in Dr. Langen (the distinguished Old- 
 Catholic divine) one who ' gives an account of the origin of episcopacy 
 precisely similar to his own, as set forth in this Essay ' i. e. the Essay 
 
 1 See his Epistle to the PhUfppians pp. 181 f. 
 
 2 See the Preface to the Sixth Edition (1881). 
 
 3 R. W. Dale's Manual of Congregational Principles, appendix p. 216. 
 * Pref. to Sixth Edition. 
 
 X
 
 322 Christian Ministry. 
 
 now under discussion. 1 But Dr. Langen's account of the matter 2 is 
 given in complete accordance with the principle of the apostolic succes- 
 sion as contended for above. He never speaks as if the Church created 
 her ministry originally, or created subsequently a new office of the 
 episcopate by elevation from below. 8 He speaks of the episcopate as 
 always handed down from the Apostles, and simply recognises, whether 
 rightly or no, that, having been originally held by all the presbyters, 
 at least in the West, it subsequently was limited to one. It is obvious 
 that the same facts may admit of being expressed under either phrase- 
 ology, though not with equal regard to their real significance. I am 
 not now concerned with the facts. My point here is only this, that 
 Dr. Lightfoot's expression of complete agreement with Dr. Langen 
 indicates that he ignores what to many people seems the question of 
 primary importance, viz., what principles regulated the devolution and 
 development of the ministry. The question is not one of archaeology 
 only, but of principle. The principles which find expression in church 
 history are at least as important as the facts in which they are expressed. 
 It is fatal to neglect either one or the other. Dr. Lightfoot's facts may 
 be perfectly true, but he may still err by ignoring the spirit which was 
 at work in them. 
 
 I venture then to point out the main defects (as they seem to me) in 
 this celebrated Dissertation. 
 
 (i) First, then, the Dissertation seems to be misleading by giving 
 countenance to a popular confusion of thought, of great importance in 
 religious matters. Men confuse two quite different antitheses. There 
 is the antithesis of what is essential and what is unessential ; there is 
 the antithesis of means and ends. In religion the latter antithesis is 
 of vital importance. There is only one end in religion. That is the 
 actual restoration of man into the image of God, and therefore into 
 unimpeded fellowship with God. To this end all else is a means 
 all sacraments and means of grace, all spiritual discipline and effort ; 
 amongst other instrumentalities the ministry. Dr. Lightfoot is there- 
 fore perfectly right in warning us against ' exalting means into ends ' 
 (P. 184). 
 
 But he appears to countenance a misleading confusion between 
 means and unessentials. ' It was against this false principle, ' he says, 
 ' that [the Apostles] waged war ; the principle which exalted the 
 means into an end, and gave an absolute intrinsic value to subordinate 
 aids and expedients. These aids and expedients, for his own sake and 
 for the good of the society to which he belonged, a Christian could not 
 
 1 ffnattus i. p. 376 note*. 
 
 2 Geschichte der rSmischen Kirche i. p. 95 f. 
 
 3 Dissert, p. 196 : ' The episcopate was formed . . . out of the presbyteral order 
 by elevation.'
 
 Note A, 323 
 
 afford to hold lightly or neglect. But they were no part of the essence 
 of God's message to man in the Gospel.' Here Dr. Lightfoot implies 
 that in recognising anything to be a means, not an end, we are recognis- 
 ing it, at the last resort, as not of the essence. He is not, of course, 
 using essence in any metaphysical sense, but in such sense as that what 
 is essential, is equivalent to what is necessary, to what is of primary 
 authority and importance. Are there not then such things as essential 
 means ? Do we say in the natural region that medicine and the ministry 
 of healing are unessential because they are only means to an end 
 beyond themselves namely, health ? No ; they are essential means. 
 Now, what is Christianity in the supernatural region ? What did 
 Christ send His Apostles to do ? To announce the true end of human 
 life the true ideal on which our eyes must always be fixed ? Most 
 certainly ; but not only perhaps not chiefly to do this. Their duty 
 was at least as primarily to call people's attention to the means which 
 God had devised ' that His banished should not be expelled from Him ' 
 (2 Sam. xiv. 14). Christ had established a kingdom or Church ; and 
 this, wilh its sacraments and its social obligations, was the divinely 
 appointed the essential or necessary means to the great end. 
 Christianity is as much the establishment of a visible system of means 
 for realizing the end of human life, as it is the divine announcement of 
 what that end is. 
 
 There are in Christianity, therefore, essential means means, that is, 
 not devised by men as the gradual outcome of their experienced needs, 
 but ordained by Christ in anticipation of them. This, of course, Dr. 
 Lightfoot would admit though his language at times would suggest 
 the false notion, on which enough has been said, that Christianity 
 came into the world as a bare ideal (see pp. 181, 182). But at least 
 he would admit that Baptism and the Lord's Supper were divinely 
 appointed means ' generally necessary to salvation. ' * Now these are 
 social sacraments ; they are parts of a social system ; they involve the 
 truth that Christ has instituted a ' kingdom of means,' a visible channel 
 for His covenanted gifts of grace. Well then, if this be so, no new 
 principle will be involved, supposing the evidence goes to show that 
 Christ instituted a ministry of truth and grace in His kingdom, intended 
 to be a permanent link of continuity and bond of unity in it. This 
 ministry becomes one of the ' means which God devised. ' But, 
 strangely enough, the question is never faced : did Christ institute 
 a ministry in the persons of His Apostles, and did they perpetuate it ? 
 
 1 But, if this is so, then the proposition that ' Christianity has no special 
 sanctuaries' is at least misleading. (p. 181). A Christian, to continue such, must 
 participate in a sacramenta 'breaking of bread,' which must be a local act, and 
 which constitutes the place where it is celebrated, without more ado, a local 
 sanctuary.
 
 324 Christian Ministry. 
 
 Dr. Lightfoot says : ' it became necessary to appoint special officers ' ; 
 ' it became necessary to provide for the emergency by definite officers ' 
 (p. 184). Was the Church ever without special officers constituted by 
 divine appointment in the Apostles ? Was not the household divinely 
 planned so as to include commissioned stewards ? 
 
 I cannot see how Dr. Lightfoot, accepting the Gospels, the Acts, 
 and the Pastoral Epistles, can answer in the negative. But what I am 
 calling attention to here is simply that he has not put the clear issue 
 before us. He speaks in the earlier part of his Essay as if all the 
 means for realizing the great ideal of humanity presented to us in Christ 
 were left to man's devising, and were therefore matter only of spiritual 
 expedience. But he is pledged to admit ' necessary means, 5 at the 
 least in the two sacraments ; and these spoil his whole theory. They 
 involve the institution by Christ of a kingdom of means. They force 
 us to put another question to ourselves, and not that which he suggests 
 to us, viz., Granted a kingdom of necessary means, is a ministry among 
 them ? 
 
 (2) Dr. Lightfoot repudiates strenuously and rightly certain falsely 
 sacerdotal conceptions (pp. 181, 182). He also admits the existence 
 in the Church of a priesthood rightly so called (pp. 182, 266, 627). 
 Confessedly in this controversy a good deal is a matter of words ; 
 something has been said on it above, and something on its historical 
 aspect will be said further on. But here again the fundamental 
 questions are, in the Dissertation, hardly put to us. Did Christ 
 institute a ministry of sacred things call it a priesthood or not in 
 such sense that the members of His Church were bound to avail them- 
 selves of it, and by this very obligation were given a centre and bond 
 of unity? Dr. Lightfoot is at liberty to call Ignatius and Irenaeus 
 unsacerdotal (pp. 250, 252) ; he is at liberty to quote Ambrosiaster as 
 ' giving a singularly appreciative account of the relation of the ministry 
 to the congregation' (p. 185 note 1 ). But these writers would have 
 answered this question with a most unhesitating affirmative ; they 
 undoubtedly believed in the necessary subordination of every one who 
 would be a Christian to the episcopal ministry which represented the 
 divine authority in the Church by succession from the Apostles ; they 
 would not have recognised as a brother any one who was separated 
 from the Church of the bishops. We go back to the apostolic age. 
 Here, again, any one is at liberty to note that the ministry is not called 
 a priesthood ; but he must recognise that there was a ministry, and 
 that it had special powers. For could any Christian receive the gift of 
 the Holy Ghost except by the laying-on of apostolic hands? Could 
 any zealous Cretan become a presbyter except by Titus' ordination ? 
 The sort of 'unsacerdotalism,' which nevertheless makes an exclusive 
 claim for an ordained ministry, is not what is wanted by anti-sacer-
 
 Note B. 325 
 
 dotalists of our day. Thus, as we read this portion of Dr. Lightfoot's 
 Essay, we feel constantly drawn ' to move the previous question.' 
 Was there ever a time in church history when men, who deserted the 
 authoritative ministry and set up one of their own outside the due 
 succession, would have been regarded as still within the covenant ? 
 Was it ever a recognised principle in the Church that an unordained 
 Christian at the last resort could celebrate the Eucharist? I shall 
 endeavour to answer these questions in the ensuing chapters. My 
 present object is not to discuss the facts so much as to point out 
 where, I think, Dr. Lightfoot tends to ignore the primary questions 
 at issue. 
 
 B. 
 
 THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE ALEXANDRIAN 
 
 MINISTRY. 
 
 (See pp. 124-130.) 
 
 JEROME'S statement (Ep. cxlvi ad Evangelum) is as follows : 
 ' Alexandriae a Marco evangelista usque ad Heraclam et Dionysium 
 episcopos presbyteri semper unum ex se electum in excelsiori gradu 
 collocatum episcopum nominabant, quomodo si exercitus imperatorem 
 facial aut diaconi eligant de se quem industrium noverint et archidia- 
 conum vocent. Quid enim facit excepta ordinatione episcopus, quod 
 presbyter non facial ? ' 
 
 These are his words. The parallel found in the military election 
 might suggest a doubt as to his meaning, but the illustration from the 
 election of an archdeacon seems plain. So at least thought the author 
 of the de Divinis Officiis (wrongly attributed to Alcuin), who quotes 
 Jerome's words and comments thus : ' Archidiaconus eandem conse- 
 crationem habet quam ceteri diaconi, sed electione fratrum praeponitur ' 
 (ap. Hittorp. p. 74) ; so also Amalarius, bishop of Treves, c. A.D. 820, 
 de Eccles. Off. ii. 13 (ap. Hittorp. p. 166) : ' Archidiaconi consecratio 
 nobis notissima est : archidiaconus eandem consecrationem habet 
 quam ceteri diaconi, sed electione fratrum praeponitur.' They both 
 treat this state of things at Alexandria as an instance of a substantial 
 original identity in the office of bishops and priests, indicated by the 
 same officers being called in the new Testament by either name. This 
 comes to them from Jerome and Ambrosiaster, whom they quote. 1 
 
 In Greek writers we get 'no hint of what Jerome mentions. We 
 leam indeed from Epiphanius that ' all the churches [or congregations] 
 1 See further App. Note F, and above, p. 159 f.
 
 326 Christian Ministry. 
 
 belonging to the catholic Church in Alexandria were under one arch- 
 bishop, and presbyters were appointed over these separately to supply 
 the ecclesiastical necessities of the inhabitants who lived in the neigh- 
 bourhood of each church ' (Haer. Ixix. I ). Thus in his day the pres- 
 byters at Alexandria had the relative independence of later parish 
 priests. 1 Of anything beyond this in the past we get no hint. 
 
 But an Arab historian is quoted to confirm Jerome. Sa'id Ibn 
 Batrik, Melkite patriarch of Alexandria from A.D. 933-943 who took 
 the Greek name of Eutychius (though he does not appear to have 
 known Greek) and wrote annals in Arabic from the creation down to 
 his own time makes the following statements : z 
 
 'Mark the evangelist appointed, with Hananias the patriarch, 
 twelve presbyters to be with the patriarch, so that when he 
 died they should choose one of the twelve presbyters, and the 
 other eleven should lay their hands on his head and bless him, 
 and make him patriarch. Afterwards they should elect another 
 eminent man and make him presbyter with themselves in place of him 
 who had been made patriarch, that they might always be twelve. 
 And this custom of the twelve presbyters of Alexandria appointing the 
 patriarch out of themselves continued till the time of the patriarch 
 Alexander, who was of the 318 [i.e. Fathers of Nicaea]; he forbade 
 the presbyters henceforth to appoint the patriarch. He also ordered 
 that when the patriarch was dead the bishops should assemble and 
 appoint a patriarch.' He also removed the restriction to elect from 
 among the twelve presbyters. 'Thus ceased the ancient custom of 
 appointing the patriarch from among the presbyters and the power of 
 appointing the patriarch came to belong to the bishops.' 
 
 ' From the time of Hananias to the time of Demetrius, the eleventh 
 patriarch of Alexandria (A.D. 189 to A.D. 231-2), there was no bishop 
 in the territory of Egypt. Nor had the patriarchs who were before 
 him appointed a bishop. When Demetrius was made patriarch he 
 appointed three bishops, and he was the first patriarch of Alexandria 
 
 1 This is all that Epiphanius says. Is it fairly represented by Dr. Bigg's ' Even 
 
 accounts for Eusebius' language .. . , , r _, 
 
 \tLTOvpyiav fyxeipi^frai Ai)/x>JTpios, and iv. 35 t riav KOLT' 'AA.efai'Speiav fKK\rjtriiav 
 TT)v fnnTKOiri)v AtovvcTio? vjToAafi/Savei. But he uses the first phrase in a more 
 doubtful sense of Irenaeus in v. 23. 
 
 2 A portion of the annals was edited first by Selden, under the title Eutychii 
 Aegyptii Patriarchal Orthodoxorum Alexandrini Ecclesiae stiae Origines, in 
 1642, in the interests of presbyterianism. He was replied to by a Maronite Father, 
 Abraham Echellensis, in his Eutychius Vindicates, 1661 ; also by Pearson in the 
 Vittdiciae Ignatianae, 1672. The Annales, or Contextio Getitmarum, is published 
 in a Latin translation in Migne's Patrol. Crate, cxi. p. 907 f. The passages quoted 
 above are from p. 982.
 
 Note B. 327 
 
 who appointed bishops. When he was dead Heraclas was appointed 
 in his place, who appointed twenty bishops.' 
 It will be noticed that Eutychius 
 
 1 I ) supports Jerome's statement, but specifies twelve presbyters, and 
 
 adds that the presbyters laid on hands, which Jerome does 
 not say : 
 
 (2) makes the arrangement last till Alexander's time, which again 
 
 contradicts Jerome and is manifestly false : 
 
 (3) speaks of ' the patriarch,' which is of course an anachronism : 
 
 (4) adds information which, if true, would be very important, viz. , 
 
 that there was only one bishop in Egypt up to the days of 
 Demetrius, who added three, and Heraclas, who increased 
 them to twenty. 
 We cannot tell whence this writer derived his information. I 
 
 think, however, that the following reasons are sufficient to prevent our 
 
 attaching any weight to what he says : 
 
 1 i ) He is so ignorant of the period to which he assigns the ' ecclesi- 
 astical revolution ' caused by the creation of the Egyptian episcopate, 
 that he actually is unaware of the existence at that time of infinitely 
 the most important man of the age Origen. When he comes to deal 
 with the fifth Council he writes thus 1 : ' There was in the time of 
 Justinian a bishop of Manbag (episcopus Manbagensis), by name 
 Origen, who taught metempsychosis, denying a resurrection. There 
 was also Ibas, bishop of Edessa (Rohensis), Thaddaeus, bishop of 
 Massisa (Massisensis), and Theodoret, bishop of Ancyra, who asserted 
 that the body of our Lord Christ was phantastic and nothing real.' 
 This will suffice as a specimen of his historical knowledge. Pearson 
 enlarges on his ignorance and blunders ( Vindic. Ignat. part I. 
 p. 294 f.). 
 
 (2) But it may be answered that however ignorant of the Greek 
 church writers, and of church history generally, he may have had 
 access to Alexandrian traditions. Have we reason then to think that 
 his statements represent ancient Egyptian tradition ? I think not. 
 Partly because Jerome, had he known what Eutychius relates, would 
 not have kept silence about it. But also and this is more important 
 because Severus, bishop of Asmonaei in Egypt, 2 who wrote a history 
 of the Alexandrian patriarchs 3 in the same century as Eutychius (c. 
 A.D. 978) and professes to have consulted Greek and Coptic remains 
 in the monastery of St. Macarius, knows nothing of what Eutychius 
 relates and gives a great many details about the election of early 
 
 1 ap. Migne I.e. p. 1073. 
 
 - Fabricius Bibl. Grate, ix. p. 349 : ' Asmonaeorum episcopus' (? = Ashmuneim). 
 3 Condensed by Renaudot into a Latin version Historia Patriarckantm 
 A lexandrinorvm.
 
 328 Christian Ministry. 
 
 patriarchs quite inconsistent with the supposed position of the twelve 
 presbyters and involving the existence of other bishops. Kenaudot 
 complains (Hist. p. 23) of Severus' ignorance and doubts his know- 
 ledge of Greek, but at least he knows more of the period of Demetrius 
 than Eutychius does. He abuses Origen out of all reason ; but he 
 knows his period and his fame as a scholar and writer. Now Severus 
 makes St. Mark consecrate a bishop, three presbyters, and seven 
 deacons, and then proceed into Pentapolis and consecrate in many 
 places bishops, priests, and deacons (Renaudot Hist. p. 4). He 
 represents Cerdo (the third bishop), as having been elected by bishops 
 and priests with the faithful laity and that too by lot (ib. p. 14), and 
 Primus (the fourth) as chosen out of the ' orthodox people ' not from 
 among the presbyters (p. 15), and Claudian (the eighth) as elected by 
 the people with the bishops (p. I7). 1 Thus the complete disagreement 
 of the more credible Severus with the statements of Eutychius seems 
 to deprive them of the claim to represent a valid tradition. 2 
 
 (3) Eutychius' information about the absence of bishops in Egypt till 
 the times of Demetrius and Heraclas seems inconsistent with what we 
 know of the history of the period. Photius records, 3 on the authority 
 of Pamphilus, the author of an Apology for Origen, the following facts : 
 ' Demetrius' love is turned [by Origen's ordination] into hatred. . . . 
 Moreover, a synod of bishops and some presbyters is gathered together 
 against Origen. And they, as Pamphilus says, vote that Origen 
 should be banished from Alexandria and neither live there nor teach, 
 but that he should not be deposed from the honour of the presbyterate. 
 But Demetrius, with some Egyptian bishops, removed him also from 
 the priesthood, those who had formerly supported him subscribing this 
 decree.' Now Pamphilus was an enthusiastic disciple of Origen, and 
 if this synod of bishops who overrode the mixed synod of bishops and 
 presbyters had been a new thing created simply by Demetrius and 
 
 1 Apparently he speaks of the election of Agrippinus the tenth patriarch in these 
 words, as rendered by Renaudot in Latin (Coll. Lit. Orient, i. p. 381) : 'convenisse 
 populum et manus imposuisse illi atque ilium ordinavisse patriarcham et in sede d. 
 Marci collocavisse.' Renaudot thinks this phrase in Severus makes it possible that 
 Eutychius only meant to imply that eleven presbyters 'got hands laid upon the new 
 patriarch.' This, however, is improbable. 
 
 a It may be said that still later historians, Georgius Homadius (El-Makin), an 
 Arab Christian who died in 1273, and the Sheikh Taqi-ed-Din El-Maqrizi (fourteenth 
 century translated by Rev. S. C. Malan in Original Documents of the Coptic 
 Church), support Eutychius in different degrees. But the former is said to be made 
 up out of Eutychius (this portion of El-Makin is not edited), and El-Maqrizi 
 undoubtedly depends upon him. 'A gifted man,' he describes him, 'who wrote a 
 useful history ' (Malan's translation p. 87). 
 
 8 Photius Bibliotheca. cod. cxviii. ap. Migne Patrol. Grace, ciii. p. 397. Pamphi- 
 lus was martyred in A.D. 309. The book was completed by his friend Eusebius, 
 bishop of Caesarea.
 
 Note B. 329 
 
 lacking altogether in constitutional authority, it is very unlikely that 
 we should not have been told so. Nay more, we should surely have 
 been able to catch in Origen's own language about bishops subsequently 
 some tone of disparagement, some hint of novel claims made in the 
 name of episcopal authority; but all his language quoted on pp. 140, 
 141, dates from the period after his expulsion and deposition. 1 Dr. 
 Bigg speaks of the patriarchate of Demetrius as involving ' the bustle 
 and excitement of a revolution,' and he alludes to ' a usurpation which 
 lay heavy on the priests.' 2 Now Demetrius died in 231 ; this 'usurpa- 
 tion ' was carried further, according to Jerome, in the episcopates of 
 his successors by the abolition of the old method of appointing bishops. 
 Yet Origen, writing about A.D. 249, speaks of the Alexandrian, among 
 other Churches, as characterized by mildness and stability (Tpaeta icai 
 ewrra#77s, c. Cels. iii. 30), and thinks apparently that the fault Celsus 
 is most likely to find in bishops and clergy is a want of zeal. 3 
 
 (4) Eutychius' information seems inconsistent with a document 
 which appears to let in light upon the very early days of Egyptian 
 church history. The document known as the Apostolical Church 
 Ordinances (which is to be distinguished both from the Apostolical 
 Constitutions and from the Apostolical Canons) is the beginning of the 
 canon law of the Egyptian Church. Its history indicates Egypt as its 
 source, and Harnack, its last editor, rightly remarks that it has a 
 provincial origin. 4 It is a composite document, and appears to contain 
 fragments of very different epochs ; some chapters (16-21) on the elec- 
 tion of bishops, on presbyters, readers, deacons, and widows, seem to 
 come from very early days. 5 The chapter on the election of a bishop 
 is very curious : ' If there be a paucity of men, and anywhere the 
 number of those able to vote for a bishop be less than twelve, let them 
 write to the neighbouring Churches, according to where it happens to 
 be, that three chosen men having come from thence, and having put 
 to the test him who is worthy namely if any one have a good report 
 of the heathen, if he be sinless, if he be a lover of the poor, if he be 
 temperate, not a drunkard, not a fornicator, not covetous, nor a railer, 
 nor a respecter of persons, nor such like things : it is good that he 
 
 1 The Homilies date from A.D. 245 and after. 
 
 2 B. L. p. loo : ' the Stromateis were written during the patriarchate of Demet- 
 rius amid the bustle and excitement of a revolution' ; and p. 119. 
 
 3 It should be remembered too that in Athanasius' day there were, as he tells us, 
 about a hundred bishops (eyyvs tKarov) in Egypt, Libya, and Pentapolis (Apol. c. 
 Ar. 71). The growth from four when Heraclas acceded (A.D. 232) to one hundred 
 when Athanasius wrote (c. A.D. 350) would have been extremely rapid. 
 
 4 Texte und Untersuch. Band ii, Heft 2, p. 193 f. and Heft 5, p. 6. 
 
 5 At latest, Harnack says, 'the first third of the third century' (Heft 2, p. 212). 
 The remarkable position of the ' reader ' above the deacon to which Harnack calls 
 attention has also to be noticed.
 
 330 Christian Ministry. 
 
 should be unmarried, or if not, a husband of one wife, educated, able 
 to interpret the Scriptures, or if unlearned, meek in character, and let 
 him abound in love towards all, lest the bishop come to be convicted 
 in any matter by the multitude.' 1 Here we have popular election, the 
 possibility of illiterate bishops, heathen surroundings, and every thing 
 that points to early days and out-of-the-way communities. This makes 
 it all the more noticeable that there is to be a bishop elected even in 
 communities where there are not twelve voters. This is better evidence 
 than Eutychius can offer ! 
 
 On the whole, then, I think it is absurd to take Eutychius as an 
 authority in the way in which some modern writers notably Dr. Bigg 
 have done. I believe the evidence would suggest 
 
 (1) a widespread episcopacy in Egypt generally, as elsewhere, even 
 in the smallest communities : 
 
 (2) a large degree of popular influence in the election down to the 
 Nicene age. 
 
 But attention has recently been called 2 to a passage in the ' Apo- 
 phthegmata,' ascribed to the Fathers of the Egyptian desert, as support- 
 ing in some sense the statement of Jerome. ' Some heretics came to 
 Pcemen [one of the Fathers who was visited by Rufinus about 375 A.D.] 
 and began to speak against the archbishop of Alexandria, on the ground 
 that he received his ordination from (irapd.) presbyters. But the old 
 man maintained silence, and then calling his brother, said, "Lay the 
 table and make them eat, and send them away in peace." ' 
 
 This may well be an authentic memorial of an historical hermit. 
 His meekness (which is the point of the story) unfortunately prevents 
 us from knowing what reply he would have given to the insult. The 
 statement of ' the heretics ' (presumably Arians) is certainly unhistorical 
 at the date at which they made it. They must have referred to 
 Athanasius (226-373), the facts about whose consecration are certainly 
 known. See Athan. Apol. c. Arian. c. 6. And it is much more 
 likely that they were simply uttering one of the innumerable Arian 
 slanders about Athanasius' consecration all baseless than that their 
 statement was based on any tradition of past Alexandrian history. 
 
 nival ayuvoios, ei fie JITJ, awb fiiaj yvva 
 ypa<f>as epjatji/euetf ei fie aypannaros, 
 t\tyxOtif eiruTKOirof an-b riav rroAAcoi' yevrjfleii). 
 3 By Dom Butler ; see Texts and Studies (Cambridge) vol. vi. no. i. p. 213.
 
 Note C. 331 
 
 C. 
 
 RITES AND PRAYERS OF ORDINATION. 
 (See pp. 131 ff. and 163 ff.) 
 
 A. GREEK RITES OF ORDINATION. 
 
 I. 
 
 The Ordination Prayers of Bishop Serapion (see above, p. 131) are 
 as follows l : 
 
 Laying-on of hands of the making (Ka.Tiurrdfft(as) of Deacons. 
 
 Father of the Only- Begotten who didst send Thy Son and didst 
 ordain the affairs (irpdyfjMra) on the earth, and hast given rules to Thy 
 church and orders (rds) for the help and salvation of the flocks, who 
 didst choose out bishops, presbyters, and deacons for the ministry of 
 Thy catholic Church, who didst choose through Thine Only-Begotten 
 the seven deacons, and didst freely give to them Holy Spirit, make 
 also this man a deacon of Thy catholic Church, and give in him a 
 spirit of knowledge and discernment, that he may be able purely and 
 unblameably to do service in this ministry (\eirovpyia) in the midst 
 of the holy people, through Thy Only- Begotten Jesus Christ, through 
 whom to Thee (is) the glory and the strength in Holy Spirit both now 
 and to all the ages of the ages. Amen. 
 
 Laying-on of hands of the making of Presbyters. 
 
 We stretch forth the hand, O Lord God of the Heavens, Father 
 of Thy Only-Begotten, upon this man, and beseech Thee that the 
 Spirit of Truth may dwell (eViS^/xiJo-j;) upon him. Give him the graces 
 of prudence and knowledge and a good heart. Let a divine Spirit 
 come to him that he may be able to be a steward over Thy people and 
 an ambassador of Thy divine oracles, and to reconcile Thy people to 
 Thee the uncreated God, Who didst give of the Spirit of Moses [and 
 put] Holy Spirit upon the chosen ones. Give a portion of Holy Spirit 
 also to this man, from the Spirit of Thy Only-Begotten, for the grace 
 of wisdom and knowledge and right faith, that he may be able to serve 
 Thee in a clean conscience, through Thy Only-Begotten Jesus Christ, 
 through whom (is) to Thee' the glory and the strength in Holy Spirit 
 both now and for all the ages of the ages. Amen. 
 
 1 See also Brightman in Journal 'of 'Tkeol. Studies (Macmillan) Oct. 1899 pp. 88 ff.
 
 332 Christian Ministry. 
 
 Laying-on of hands of the making of a Bishop. 
 
 Thou who didst send the Lord Jesus for the gain of all the world 
 (OI'/COU/^VT/S), Thou who didst through him choose the apostles, Thou 
 who generation by generation dost ordain holy bishops, O God of 
 truth, make also this bishop a living bishop, holy 1 of the succession 
 of the holy apostles, and give to him grace and divine Spirit, that Thou 
 didst freely give to all Thy own (yvyalois) servants and prophets and 
 patriarchs : make him to be worthy to shepherd Thy flock and let him 
 still continue unblameably and inoffensively in the bishopric through 
 Thy Only-Begotten Jesus Christ, through whom to Thee (is) the glory 
 and the strength in Holy Spirit both now and to all the ages ef the 
 ages. Amen. 
 
 II. 
 
 A rite in a Ms. stated by Morinus to be of the ninth century (de 
 Sacr. Ord. p. ii. p. 64 f.) is to the following effect : 
 
 (a) For a bishop. The archbishop reads the declaration of his elec- 
 tion : ' the Divine Grace . . . appoints such an one, the well-beloved 
 presbyter, to be bishop.' 2 This he reads ' holding his hand upon the 
 head of him who is being ordained.' Then, after the Kyrie Eleison, 
 ' the archbishop lays the Gospel on his head and neck (while other 
 bishops stand by and touch it), and, laying his hand on him, prays 
 thus." In the prayer he invokes God as having ordained, through his 
 
 1 ayiof. Perhaps we should read a.^iov ' worthy.' 
 
 2 This is the ai/apprjcris iepa (Dionysius ap. Morinus de S. O. p. ii. p. 57). It was 
 made in the case of each order, and means that the consecrator (ieporeAe'cm)?) is the 
 interpreter of the divine election and does not act by the impulse of his own favour 
 (ISiij xapm). This emphasis on the choice of divine grace is common to all 
 (apparently) the oriental rites of ordination. 
 
 These rites are given in Morinus de Sacr. Ord. pars ii. For the COPTIC, see 
 pp. 507-8 (as in the Apostolical Constitutions and the Latin rites, the presbyters 
 are compared to the seventy elders) ; for the JACOBITE, pp. 482 f. (it contains direc- 
 tions for impressive solemnity of manner in the consecrating bishop 'manus 
 deprimit tremulas . . . oculis desuper cum timore aspicientibus ' pp. 484, 487): 
 for the MARONITE, pp. 404 f. In these last the idea of succession by laying-on of 
 hands is strangely traced from God on Mount Sinai, through Moses and Aaron, to 
 John the Baptist, from John the Baptist to Christ, from Christ to His Apostles ; cf. 
 Ephraem Syr. Opp. Syr. ii. p. 448 [ed. Rom. 1740]. The hierarchy of earth is com- 
 pared, as by Clement, to the grades of angelic glory. There are distinct rites for the 
 ordination of chorepiscopus, bishop, and patriarch. The prayer for the chor- 
 episcopus speaks of the ' imposition of the Divine Hand ' (p. 416), but the ritual 
 direction for the laying-on of hands is only given in the case of the patriarch (p. 429). 
 The NESTORIAN rites are on pp. 452 f. They contain prayers for the gifts of 
 miraculous power to heal the sick, and generally (pp. 457-465). Throughout all 
 these rites there is the same general conception of the sacerdotal offices the same 
 conception of laying on apostolic hands, with accompanying prayer, with a view to 
 the obtaining of the grace qualifying for the distinct orders of the ministry.
 
 Note C. 333 
 
 Apostle St. Paul, divers orders for the ministry of His holy mysteries 
 at His altar apostles, prophets, teachers and prays Him that the 
 person now elected to pass under the yoke of the Gospel and under 
 the high-priestly dignity, through the laying-on of his and his assistants' 
 hands, by the descent and power and grace of the Holy Spirit, may be 
 strengthened with his holy unction, like prophets and kings and high- 
 priests of old, and made a blameless high-priest and intercessor for 
 his people. 
 
 Afterwards, intercessions follow, during which the archbishop keeps 
 his hand on the head of him who is being ordained (TOV \eiporovovfjAvov) 
 and prays thus : ' O Lord God, who, because the nature of man 
 cannot bear the essence of the Godhead, hast in Thy economy appointed 
 us teachers of like passions with ourselves, occupying Thy seat, to offer 
 Thee sacrifice and offering on behalf of all Thy people, do Thou, O 
 Lord, make this man who has been appointed (avaftfixOevra.) a steward 
 of the grace of the high-priesthood, an imitator of Thee, the true 
 Pastor, laying down his life for the sheep, being a guide of the blind, 
 a light of those in darkness, an instructor of the ignorant, a light of the 
 world, that having prepared the souls committed to him in this life, 
 he may stand without shame at Thy judgment seat.' Then the arch- 
 bishop puts the book of the Gospels upon the altar, and the ' omo- 
 phorion ' on him who has been ordained (T<$ xeipvrovTiOtvTi), and 
 kisses him, and mounts with him to the common throne (avvdpovos). 
 
 (6) For a presbyter. ' The archbishop makes three signs of the 
 cross upon his head and, having his hand laid upon him, prays thus ' : 
 he invokes 'the Ancient of days (6 wdvi}* Krkrewj TrpefffivTaros 
 vTra.p-x.d3v) who has dignified with the name of presbyter those who 
 are thought worthy in this grade (fiaO/jibs) to minister (lepovpyew) the 
 word of His truth ' ; and prays Him to bestow on the present chosen 
 person ' this great grace of His Holy Spirit,' that he may walk worthily 
 of the holy priestly honour committed to him. 
 
 Then intercessions follow, the archbishop holding his hand on the 
 head of ' him who is being ordained ' and praying that God will fill 
 him, whom He has thought worthy to undertake the office of presbyter, 
 with His Holy Spirit, ' that he may stand blamelessly at His altar, and 
 preach the Gospel of His salvation, and minister (iepovprfetv) the word 
 of His truth, and offer Him gifts and spiritual sacrifices, and renew 
 His people by the laver of regeneration. ' 
 
 Then he gives him the appropriate dress and kiss, and later on 
 associates him with himself in the service of the altar. 
 
 In a later office (p. 112), the bishop gives the just ordained presby- 
 ter the consecrated bread with the words : ' Receive this deposit, and 
 guard it to the coming of our Lord.' In general, with some ritual 
 additions, the rite is unchanged. In the rite of the ordination of a
 
 334 Christian Ministry. 
 
 bishop there is a long declaration of faith (p. 120 f.) and the giving 
 of the pastoral staff, but no substantial change in the idea of the 
 service or alteration in the rite and prayer. See Daniel Codex Litur- 
 gicus iv. pp. 556-563. 
 
 B. LATIN RITES OF ORDINATION. 
 
 There is an excellent account of these rites s.v. ORDINAL in the 
 Diet. Chr. Ant. by Dr. Hatch ; and they are described at length with 
 elaborate references s.v. ORDINATION. The most recent and exact 
 account of the MSS. of the sacramentaries is M. Delisle's Mimoire sur 
 fanciens sacramentaires [Paris, 1886]. We have 
 
 (1) Early accounts of the rite of ordination without prayers. Cf. 
 Martene de Ant. Eccl. Rit. [Antwerp, 1736] ii. pp. 86 f. (Ordo i), 
 151 f. (Ordo ix given in part ap. Hittorp. de Div. Cath. Eccl. Off, 
 p. 88) ; Muratori Lit. Rom. Vet. [Venice, 1748] i. p. 515 (the preface 
 to the prayer of benediction). 
 
 (2) Early prayers of benediction without accompanying rites. Cf. 
 Muratori I.e. i. p. 421 f. (Leonine), ii. p. 358 f. (Gregorian), i. pp. 
 513 f. and 622 f. (Gelasian). 
 
 (3) Early rites with benedictions. Cf. Muratori ii. pp. 406 f., 
 415 f. ; Morinus p. ii. pp. 261-341 (Missale Francorum, etc.). 
 
 i. Ordination of presbyters. This begins with a presentation of the 
 ordinand to the bishop : an address to the people, solemnly asking 
 their assent : sometimes an examination of the ordinand : a declara- 
 tion of election by the bishop, and a request for common prayer 
 'commune votum communis oratio prosequatur.' Then follows the 
 ordination the presbyters with the bishop laying on hands. Of the 
 following prayers the first is in all the forms : 
 
 (a) A collect (Oratio) for the outpouring of the 'benediction of the 
 Holy Spirit and the virtue of sacerdotal grace ' upon him who is 
 'offered for consecration.' 
 
 (3) The Consecratio. God is invoked as the harmonious dispenser 
 of all the distinctive grades and offices in the world, 'unde sacerdotalis 
 gradus et officia Levitarum sacramentis mysticis instituta creverunt ' ; 
 special commemoration is made of His having ordained to offices of 
 assistance in His kingdom at every stage ' men of a second order and 
 dignity' (sequentis ordinis, secundae dignitatis) : to assist 
 Moses, the seventy elders : to supplement Aaron's priesthood, that of 
 his sons: to accompany the Apostles, 'teachers of the faith,' so that 
 they filled the whole world with these ' second preachers ' (that is, 
 apparently, the seventy). So God is implored to give His bishops 
 now as in their greater weakness they need it the more the supple- 
 mentary ministry of the presbyters, and, in particular, to give 'to 
 this His servant the dignity of the presbyterate, to renew in his heart 
 the Spirit of holiness, that he may receive and hold from God the
 
 Note C. 335 
 
 gift of second worth (secundi meriti munus), and by the example 
 of his conversation set the standard of conduct (censuram morum 
 insinuet), so that he may be the worthy assistant of the bishop 
 (probus, or, providus nostri ordinis cooperator).' These 
 prayers are in the Leonine Sacramentary (which seems to be the 
 earliest that remains, and the Verona MS. of which is assigned by 
 Delisle, Memoire etc. p. 65, to the seventh century) and in the 
 Gregorian. 
 
 (c) In the Gelasian MS. (end of seventh or beginning of eighth cen- 
 tury, Delisle I.e. p. 68), the Missale Francorum (end of seventh or 
 beginning of eighth century, Delisle l.c. p. 72), and many later 
 missals, we have after the Consecratio an invitation to prayer, 
 entitled Consummatio Presbyteri, for the ' sacerdotal gifts of the Holy 
 Spirit ' on the new presbyter. This is followed by the prayer, called 
 Benedict, that he may be all an elder ought to be, in meditation 
 of God's law, in faith, in teaching, in life : ' that he may keep pure 
 and undefiled the gift of the mystery [? ministry], and in the service 
 of His people may, by the body and blood of His Son by undefiled 
 benediction, be transformed into inviolable love and into a perfect 
 man.' 1 Then (in the Missale Francorum) there is a Consecratio 
 Manus an unction of the presbyter's hands with a prayer, ' ut quae- 
 cunque benedixerint benedicta sint, et quaecunque sanctificaverint, 
 sanctificentur. ' 
 
 In all this there is no mention of offering sacrifice, or of absolution. 
 The presbyter is viewed as the assistant of the bishop. But gradual 
 alterations in the ordination of priests tend to emphasize their special 
 sacerdotal functions, and thus to give them a more independent priest- 
 hood. Thus, as an accompaniment to the vesting in the chasuble, a 
 benediction ' ut ofieras placabiles hostias pro peccatis atque ofFen- 
 sionibus populi omnipotent! Deo' appears in the Codex S. Eligii 
 
 1 This is perhaps the earliest form of this prayer, the varieties of which are re- 
 markable. This form is from an Anglo-Saxon missal in Morinns l.c. p. 282 f. ' ut 
 purum atque immaculatum mysterii [? minister!!] donum custodial, et per obsequium 
 plebis tuae corpore et sanguine filii tui immaculata benedictione transformetur ad 
 inviolabilem charitatem et in virum perfectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis 
 Christi [? et] in die iusti et aeterni iudicii . . . Spiritu sancto plenus apparent." 
 This MS. is dated by Delisle, p. 220, at the beginning of the eleventh century. In a 
 Corbey MS. of the tenth century (Morinus p. 304, Delisle p. 189) we have the same 
 form, but with an insertion which spoils the sense of vel corpus before 
 corpore. This indicates an approximation to the form of the prayer as it occurs 
 in the Gelasian and Prankish missals, in which it is a prayer for the transformation 
 not of the priest but of the elements : 'ut per obsequium plebis tuae corpus et 
 sanguinem filii tui immaculata benedictione transformet, et inviolabili 
 charitate in virum perfectum, . : . S.s. plenus persolvat ' : or, still more clearly, 
 (Morinus p. 319) ' et per obsequium plebis tuae panem et vinum in corpus et 
 sanguinem filii tu . . . transformet. 1
 
 336 Christian Ministry. 
 
 (ninth or tenth century ; Morinus p. 270, Delisle p. 175). So in the 
 Anglo-Saxon MS. of eleventh century (Morinus p. 282 f.), which also 
 adds in the Consecratio Manus ' ad consecrandas hostias quae pro 
 delictis atque negligentiis populi ofiferuntur'; cf. a Sens MS. (tenth 
 century, ib. p. 294 f.) and the Codex Ratoldi (tenth century, ib. p. 
 298 f.). In a (?) twelfth century MS. (ib. p. 329 f.) appears the 
 porrectio instrumentorum with ' Accipe potestatem offerre sacrificium 
 Deo missamque celebrare et tarn pro vivis quam et pro defunctis.' 
 Lastly in thirteenth century MSS. (Morinus pp. 338, 340) we have the 
 ' Accipe Spiritum sanctum ; quorum remiseritis peccata etc.' 
 
 On the newly ordained presbyters concelebrating with the bishop, 
 see Morinus I.e. p. iii. ex. viii. 1. I f. 
 
 ii. The ordination of a bishop. In Martene's Ordo i. (I.e. ii. p. 87) 
 we have provisions for securing that the bishop has been duly elected 
 'a populo civitatis,' and for his examination in respect of morality, 
 discipline, etc., both in private and in public, and for his due pre- 
 sentation. All this precedes the ordination by the interval of a day. 
 Commonly a public examination of him who was to be ordained, in 
 respect of doctrine and morality, took place at the time of the 
 ordination (see Morinus p. ii. p. 27 5 J. 1 This is followed by a declara- 
 tion of election, and the ordination. 2 
 
 1 The examination in doctrine and morals is enjoined in the so-called Canons of 
 the 4th Carthaginian Council in A.D. 398 (which really are 104 canons, collected 
 from East and West some time before the sixth century, and described as ' secun- 
 dum Gallorum institutiones ' in the Ordo Romanus ap. Hittorp. p. 97). 
 
 In the Missale Francorum which gives one of the earliest rites, we find first 
 an Exhortatio adpopulum to choose a worthy successor to the pastoral office : the 
 election is to be 'testimonio presbyterorum et totius cleri et consilio 
 civium ac consistentium,' and the elected is to be 'natalibus nobilis, moribus 
 clarus, religione probus, fide stabilis, . . . tenax in cunctis quae sacerdoti elegenda 
 sunt.' Then follow prayers for God's assistance and the effusion on those to be 
 ordained of sacerdotal grace. After this the people are exhorted to pray God, who 
 has established a propitiation for Himself and sacrifices and sacred rites (qui placa- 
 tionem suam et sacrificia et sacra constituit), to fill the high-priest with the due 
 plenitude of honour and grade, with spiritual gifts, and wealth of sanctification, and 
 especially with humility, that as a ruler he may make himself low and be among his 
 flock as one of themselves (quasi unus ex illis), trembling always for the account for 
 souls which he must give ; also that he may be made fit for all sacred rites by the 
 supreme benediction, the utmost that man can give (universis sacris sacrandisque 
 idoneus fiat sub hac quae est homini per hominem postrema benedictio). 
 
 2 The Canons of the 4th Carthaginian Council may have introduced into the 
 West the eastern custom at the ordination of a bishop, i.e. the holding the book o. 
 the Gospels over his head. (See quotations in Bingham Antiq. ii. ii. 8 from Apost. 
 Const., Chrysostom, pseudo-Dionysius.) In the western collection of canons it 
 assumes this form (c. 2) : ' Episcopus cum ordinatur, duo episcopi ponant et teneant 
 evangeliorum codicem super caput et cervicem eius et, uno super eum fundente 
 benedictionem, reliqui omnes episcopi, qui adsunt, manibus suis caput eius tangant.' 
 So it passed into western writers and missals ; cf. Amalarius de Eccl. Off. ii. 14 ap.
 
 Note C. 337 
 
 The most original and constant accompanying prayer seems to be 
 (a) a collect, as in the ordination of a presbyter, for the infusion of 
 ' sacerdotal grace, the virtue of the divine benediction,' followed by 
 (3) the Consecratio. In this God is invoked as having instituted all 
 the symbolism of the old priesthood ; because all that was there 
 symbolized by outward decoration is to be realized in our priesthood 
 by spiritual endowment ; it is no longer the ' honor vestium,' but the 
 ' splendor animarum. ' Therefore He is implored to grant ' ut quicquid 
 ilia velamina in fulgore auri, in nitore gemmarum et multimodi operis 
 varietate signabant, hoc in horum moribus clarescat.' Then there is a 
 prayer that ' the unction of the Spirit (accompanying, as other MSS. 
 specify, the symbolic external unction) may flow down abundantly 
 upon those who are being ordained, " ut tui Spiritus virtus et interiorum 
 ora repleat et exteriora circumtegat " ; that they may be endowed with 
 faith, love, peacefulness ; [that they may be true evangelists ; that they 
 may have the ministry of reconciliation, in word and in the power of 
 signs and wonders (signorum et prodigiorum) ; that their preaching may 
 have power ; that God will give them the keys of the kingdom of 
 heaven, and they may use them rightly, "to edification and not to 
 destruction " ; that what they bind on ea.rth may be bound in heaven, 
 etc. ; that whose sins they retain may be retained, and whose sins they 
 remit may be remitted ; that whom they bless may be blessed, and 
 whom they curse may be cursed ; that they may feed and perfect their 
 flock ; that they may have all zeal and right judgment ;] that God may 
 give them the episcopal see (cathedra) for ruling His Church, be to 
 them authority and power and strength, and multiply His blessing 
 upon them.' The part of the prayer enclosed in brackets [ ] is in the 
 Gelasian Sacr. (Murat. I.e. i. p. 625) and in the Missale Francorum 
 (Morinus I.e. p. 266), but not in the Leonine (Murat. I.e. i. p. 422) or 
 Gregorian Sacr. (ib. ii. p. 358). Omitting this part of the prayer, we 
 have in the whole rite no specification of the special function of sacrifice 
 or of the power of the keys. 
 
 Later on there are a number of additions to the rite, connected with 
 the giving of the ring, pastoral staff, etc. The enthronization of the 
 bishop would probably have formed part of the rite from the beginning ; 
 see Martene's Ord. i. and ii. (I.e. ii. pp. 88, 90). 
 
 Hittorp. p. 167 : ' Dicit libellus, secundum cuius ordinem celebratur ordinatio apud 
 quosdam, ut duo episcopi teneant evangelium, etc.' It occurs in the Missale Fran- 
 corum (Morinus I.e. p. 261), and in the Ordo Romanus (ap. Hittorp. p. 100). But it 
 b omitted in one form given in the Ordo (ib. p. 96) ; and we find (pseudo) Albinus 
 Flaccus, dt Div. Off. ap. Hittorp. p. 74, protesting thus : ' illud vero (here follows 
 the canon) non reperitur in auctoritate veteri neque nova, sed neque in Romana 
 traditione.'
 
 338 Christian Ministry. 
 
 D. 
 
 I. CANON XIII OF ANCYRA. 
 II. CHOREPISCOPI. 
 
 (Seep. 141.) 
 
 I. THIS canon has been commonly quoted (see Dr. Lightfoot 
 Dissert, p. 232) in this form : x <a P eiriffK ^' irois /J.TJ O-eivai irpffffivrtpovs 
 ?) diaKOvovs x el P OTO ' /e "' dXXd, fj.i]v pr/d^ irpeffpvrtpots ir6Xews xupls TOV 
 tiriTpairijvai virb TOV tiriffKbwov /iera ypafj.fji.dTui> Iv e/cdor?; irapoudq. 
 c It is not allowed to country bishops to ordain presbyters or deacons, 
 nor even to city presbyters, except permission be given in each parish 
 by the bishop in writing.' In this form it recognises implicitly the 
 power of presbyters to ordain under certain circumstances. But is this 
 the right reading ? The manuscripts and versions, Greek and Latin, 
 of the Canons of Ancyra, and especially of the I3th canon, have 
 recently been the subject of a very thorough examination by the Rev. 
 R. B. Rackham in ti\zStudia+Biblica et Ecclesiastica, vol. iii. (Oxford, 
 1891), pp. 139, 194. There is appended a collation of the Syriac 
 and Armenian versions. Mr. Rackham concludes in favour of the 
 reading I have translated in the text : . . . dXXa V.T\V fj.f)8 irpeffftvrtpovs 
 w6\eus . . . ev eT^pa irapoiKia. 
 
 This conclusion is strengthened by the Syriac and Armenian 
 versions for irptafivrtpovs. But the ^Syriac at least support iic&ffTjj 
 instead of erf pa. 
 
 The question of reading is, no doubt, an obscure one. Accepting 
 Mr. Rackham's conclusion as to the reading, I should still venture to 
 think that (at least in the case of such Greek as the Canons of Ancyra 
 present to us) dXXct nty (j.i)5t may be translated ' no nor (town pres- 
 byters) either,' rather than 'not even,' as Lightfoot insists, and Mr. 
 Rackham assents, that it must be. In Constit. Apost. ii. 45 : Kal ^ 
 ivl npiT-fjpiov fdvinttv. dXXct fj.7)v fj.t]d d.v^x eff ^ KOffftundi 
 KO.TO, r&v rjueT^puv SiKafeiv (quoted by Routh), the phrase 
 does not mean, I think, ' do not even,' but ' nay, do not. ' Cf. canon 13 
 of Neo Cesarea : irtx&pioi irpecr/Stfrepoi . . . irpofffapew oil Sdvavrai. 
 . . . otfre fiyr (no nor) &PTOV SiS6vai. For ov . . . oi>5 and ov . . . 
 otfre, see Winer, Gr. of N.T. Greek (ed. Moulton, 1882) p. 612. 
 
 Mr. Rackham translates : ' Chorepiscopi may not ordain (any) 
 presbyters or deacons (of town or country), but not even town 
 presbyters (in their own parish) without the permission of their 
 (town) bishops in writing in another parish ' dXXd nty to 
 being an afterthought.
 
 Note D. 339 
 
 II. CHOREPISCOPI were country bishops ordained to supervise the 
 scattered flock in rural districts 'vicarii episcoporum,' as Isidore of 
 Seville calls them. We begin to hear of them in the East as established 
 institutions early in the fourth century : first in the canon of Ancyra 
 just discussed. Later they had a great development in the West also. 
 The tenth canon of Antioch, A.D. 341, indicates (a) that they might be 
 ordained by the one bishop alone, who presided over the adjacent town 
 church ; (b) that they might ordain to the minor orders, but not to the 
 diaconate or presbyterate without the leave of the bishop under whom 
 they served. It limits their power thus : ei /ecu xfipoBeaLnv elei/ tiri- 
 ffKbiruv eiXij^ores, i.e. as Dionysius Exiguus adds in his trans, 'ut episcopi 
 consecrati sunt.' We find them present at councils voting and signing, 
 presumably with the assent of their superior bishops; see Bingham 
 Ant. ii. 14. 10 ; Morinus de Sacr. Ord. p. iii. ex. iv. I. 12. Athanasius 
 classes them with bishops in Apol. c. Ar. 85 : ' Mareotis is a district 
 of Alexandria, and there has never been in the district 
 a bishop or chorepiscopusj but only presbyters subject to the 
 bishop of Alexandria. An ordination by a chorepiscopus is recorded 
 in Hist. Lausiac. cvi, ap. Migne Patrol. Lat. Ixxiii. p. 1193. Isidore, 
 de Eccl. Off. ii. 6, describes them thus : ' Chorepiscopi, id est vicarii 
 episcoporum, iuxta quod canones ipsi testantur, instituti sunt ad 
 exemplum Ixx seniorum tanquam sacerdotes propter sollicitudinem 
 pauperum. 1 Hi in vicis et villis instituti gubernant sibi conmissas 
 ecclesias, habentes licentiam constituere lectores, subdiaconos, ex- 
 orcistas. Presbyteros autem et diaconos ordinare non audeant praeter 
 conscientiam episcopi in cuius regione praeesse noscuntur. Hi autem 
 a solo episcopo civitatis cui adiacent ordinantur.' 
 
 ' Later, in the awful collapse of discipline which characterized the 
 Frankish kingdom, they were indefinitely multiplied : wandering bishops 
 ordained wandering clergy, and neither bishops nor clergy were easily 
 brought to acknowledge a superior.' 2 Isidore speaks bitterly of this 
 state of things (de Eccl. Off. ii. 3) : ' Duo sunt genera clericorum: unum 
 ecclesiasticorum sub regimine episcopali degentium : alterum acephalo- 
 rum . . . quern sequantur ignorantium. Hos . . . solutos atque oberran- 
 tes sola turpis vita complectitur et vaga . . . quorum quidem sordida 
 atque infami numerositate, satis superque nostra pars occidua polluitur.' 3 
 
 1 Cf. Cone. Neo Caes. c. 14. Rabanus Maurus (de Inst. Cler. \. 5 ap. Hittorp. 
 p. 315) adds : ' ne eis [sc. pauperibus qui in agris et villis consist unt] solatium con- 
 firmationis deesset.' 
 
 2 Hatch Growth of Church Institutions p. 159. 
 
 3 Morinus (I.e. c. 5 4) finds in the circumstances of his own day a parallel to the 
 ancient appointment of chorepiscppi in a way which led to their abuse : ' ut nunc, in 
 Germania potissimum, ditissimi et principes illi episcopi titularibus episcopis 
 [utuntur] . . . qui pauca mercede content! dioecesis onera ferunt, quamdiu veri 
 episcopi Endymionis somnum dormiunt.'
 
 34O Christian Ministry. 
 
 Hence at the restoration of discipline, which marks the age of Charles 
 the Great, 1 the chorepiscopi were the subjects of strong animad- 
 version. Their usurpation of authority led to a disparagement of 
 their original position. Papal decisions not however that of Pope 
 Nicholas, A.D. 864 pronounced them mere presbyters. Hence later 
 Roman Catholic writers, e.g. Morinus and others, 2 have argued in 
 this sense. The papal authority constitutes their real argument 
 ' efficacissimum argumentum,' as says Morinus. However, he also 
 argues (i) That they are compared to the seventy elders, which is 
 the comparison appropriated to presbyters* Yes: to presbyters as 
 assistants. This is the point of the comparison, and it holds for chor- 
 episcopi also. Further, it is well known that the Old Testament 
 anologies are loosely applied, (ii) That ordinations of bishops by one 
 bishop were not tolerated, while chorepiscopi were so ordained. Yes : 
 this, however, was a matter of provincial discipline to secure the 
 assent of the provincial bishops. But the chorepiscopi were an inferior 
 sort of bishops with only a local, not a provincial or catholic, position. 
 Morinus, however, does not hold them to have been presbyters pure 
 and simple but a sort of middle order : ' non sunt presbyteri simplices, 
 sed inter episcopatum, et presbyteratum media dignitas ' (I.e. c. 5 12). 
 The view given above of the position of the chorepiscopi may be 
 described as the ordinary view. It seems to be the only one supported 
 by the evidence. Dr. Lightfoot, in his Dissert, p. 233, represents them 
 as a survival of the original presbyter-bishops, but this theory has no 
 evidence except such as is derived from the misread canon of Ancyra. 
 The eastern chorepiscopi of later days were confessedly only presbyters. 
 Further information (with reference to their privileges, uses, etc. , and 
 their suppression) can be found in Bingham I.e. ; Morinus I.e. ; and 
 Diet. Chr. Biog. s.v. 
 
 E. 
 
 SUPPOSED ORDINATIONS BY PRESBYTERS IN 
 EAST AND WEST. 
 
 (Seepp. 149, 151.) 
 EASTERN CHURCH. 
 
 THE only case of such an ordination alleged in the East is that of 
 Paphnutius. Dr. Hatch (B. L. p. 108, n. 62 , ist edition only) spoke of 
 this formerly as ' the clearest case . . . maintainable on the evidence.' 
 But it will not at all bear examination. Cassian, writing his Memoirs 
 
 l Hatch I.e. p. 28 f. 2 See Bingham I.e. 2, 3. 
 
 :; See Morinus I.e. c. 2, 6-iz.
 
 Note E. 341 
 
 of Oriental hermits at Marseilles about A.D. 422, tells us that the 
 presbyter-abbot Paphnutius, 'promoted' one of his companions on 
 account of his conspicuous virtue, first to the diaconate, and then to 
 the presbyterate (Collat. iv. i : 'a Paphnutio presbytero . . . [Danielis] 
 ad diaconii est praelatus officium . . . eum presbyterii honore provexit 
 [Paphnutius]'). This is taken to mean that he ordained him, and 
 Cassian is supposed to mention it without surprise. 
 
 But (i) it is most improbable that Cassian, writing when and where 
 he did, should mention such an act as if it were nothing surprising. 
 He himself was in intimate relations with bishops in the West and 
 knew well the difference between a monk and an ecclesiastical officer. 
 See xi. 2 and his dedication to bks i. and xi. 
 
 (2) We have other evidence of the sense in which an abbot could 
 promote to church offices. He could do it in the same sense as persons 
 in power of any sort in the Church, as, for instance, a Prime Minister 
 or patron of our day. He could get him ordained at his nomination. 
 So we have a provision in the rule of St. Benedict (cap. 62) for abbots 
 selecting worthy monks and getting them ordained. It should be 
 noticed that this power of ' nominating ' seems to have been a special 
 privilege of the Alexandrian clergy : see Socr. H. E. i. 9 (the synodal 
 letter from the Council of Nicaea to the Church of Alexandria) T/>OX- 
 ptffaOai rj inropd\\eiv ovo/j-ara. 
 
 (3) The narrative of the abbot Ammonius, a friend of the older 
 Athanasius (Hist. Laus. xii, ap. Migne Patrol. Lat. Ixxiii. pp. 1 103- 
 1104), shows how utterly distinct, in the minds of the Egyptian monks, 
 was the conception of a bishop from that of an abbot ; an attempt was 
 made to induce Ammonius to be ordained bishop and he resisted to 
 death. The same broad distinction appears in Athanasius' letter to 
 Dracontius. 
 
 (4) We are then bound to interpret the words in the present passage 
 in the sense of ' nomination,' if they will admit of it. And they will 
 do so without any difficulty. Instances are frequent in which influential 
 laymen are said even to ' ordain ' church officers, where there can be 
 no doubt that what is meant is to appoint or get ordained ; the laity 
 of Oxyrinchus in Arian days ' episcopum sibi per tune temporis episcopos 
 catholicos ordinavit ' (Marcell. et Faust. Lib. Prec. ap. Migne Patrol. 
 Lat. xiii. p. 101); again, without any explanation, Gregory of Tours 
 Hist. Franc, viii. 22 : ' Rex pollicitus fuerat se nunquam ex laicis 
 episcopum ordinaturum.' Otto in says 'Sylvestrum papam elegimus 
 et , . . ordinavimus et creavimus' (Gieseler E. H. Eng. trans, 
 ii. p. 358, n. 28 ). St. Cyprian, as will be seen, uses constituo and 
 facio in the sense of procuring the appointment ; cf. Bright Early 
 Eng. Ch. History p. 134, from whom most of these instances are 
 taken.
 
 342 Christian Ministry. 
 
 (5) It must be borne in mind that supposing Paphnutius had at- 
 tempted to ordain any one in the ecclesiastical sense, he would have 
 done what, in the patriarchate of Alexandria, had been already (in 
 Colluthus' case) pronounced null and void, and Daniel by the decision 
 of the synod would have been regarded as a layman. But, as we have 
 said, there is no reasonable case to be made out for his having done so. 
 
 WESTERN CHURCH. 
 
 1. The presbyter Novatus is said to have ordained Felicissimus 
 deacon, and it is contended (Hatch B. L. p. no, n 52 .) that St. Cyprian 
 did not regard the act as invalid. What is the state of the case ? 
 'He appointed Felicissimus deacon (Felicissimum diaconum con- 
 stituit),' St. Cyprian says (Ep. Hi. 2), and there is, it is urged, 
 ' nothing in the context to support the view that he uses the word in 
 the unusual sense of " procured the appointment." ' Is there nothing ? 
 St. Cyprian goes on to say that the same Novatus, when he left Africa 
 and got to Rome, made Novatian a bishop. He uses the same word 
 in both cases: ' qui istic adversus ecclesiam diaconum fecerat illic 
 episcopum fecit.' He made Felicissimus a deacon, we may presume, 
 in exactly the same sense as that in which he made Novatian a bishop. 
 And in what sense did he do that ? We know from the contemporary 
 letter of Cornelius, the outraged bishop of Rome (ap. Euseb. H. E. 
 vi. 43) : ' he [Novatian] compelled three bishops, boorish and most 
 foolish men, ... to give him the episcopate by a shadowy and vain 
 imposition of hands.' Cf. Cyprian Ep. xlix. i : ' ei manum quasi in episco- 
 patum imponi.' Novatus then made Novatian a bishop and Felicis- 
 simus a deacon in this sense, that he got them made such by people, 
 who, however 'boorish' or 'foolish,' were none the less bishops 
 (unless indeed Felicissimus was a deacon before, which is possible ; 
 see s.v. Diet. Chr. Biog.\ 
 
 2. Dr. Hatch alleges in the same note that presbyter-missionaries in 
 the Middle Ages ordained under exceptional circumstances of necessity, 
 e.g. St. Willehad and St. Liudger, of the eighth century, are both in 
 their lives said to have ' constituted Churches and ordained presbyters 
 over them '; see Pertz Monumenta Hist. German, ii. pp. 381,411: 
 ' ecclesias [Willehadus] coepit construere ac presbyteros super eas 
 ordinare.' In both cases, however, a little investigation makes it 
 plain that ordinare is used in the sense of 'appointing,' as it is used 
 of secular persons (see just above). In the case of Willehad, his 
 biographer tells us he remained a presbyter too long, because it was 
 feared that the lawlessness of the Frisians would not tolerate the 
 authority of a bishop. He therefore continued ' cuncta potestate 
 praesidentis ordinans secundum quod poterat,' i.e. up to a
 
 Note E. 343 
 
 presbyter's power. Afterwards Charles the Great had him made 
 bishop, 'consecrari fecit.' Then he redoubled his efforts and went 
 about ' confirmans populum qui olim baptizatus fuerat. ' He could not 
 therefore confirm till he was made bishop. Is it likely then that he 
 could ordain ? In ruling Churches and appointing presbyters, however, 
 he had only been doing what many ' ruling presbyters ' in the mission 
 field had done since, and are doing. In the case of Liudger, we are 
 told that he was kept from being consecrated bishop by a sense of 
 unworthiness and tried to get some one else consecrated in his place. 
 Here then was not even a case of necessity, if such could be admitted, 
 for a presbyter ordaining. The word is clearly used in his case, as in 
 Willehad's for 'appointing,' and both cases fall together. Both 
 missionaries come in a close relation to the see of Rome and its strict 
 discipline. 
 
 3. Dr. Hatch says further : ' Ordination by other than a bishop, with 
 the permission of the pope, is allowed even by the schoolmen and canonists, 
 although the question is discussed among them whether the pope's licence 
 can extend to the conferring of all orders, or should be limited to orders 
 below the presbyterate (I.e. p. no, n. 5s ). Now there need be noquestion 
 here of orders below the presbyterate. What the matter comes to is this : 
 a few mediaeval canonists (see opinions quoted in Morinus de Sacr. 
 Ord. p. iii. ex. iii. 1-5 f. ) maintained the theory that the papal licence 
 could enable a presbyter validly to confer his own order (and even a 
 confirmed Christian his own confirmation). But (a) this was a mere 
 abstract question ; there is no instance of a pope having attempted to 
 give such a licence. And (b) Dr. Hatch's ' even ' is singularly out of 
 place ; this was an instance of papalism overriding Catholicism. The 
 men who made these claims on behalf of the pope were least of all 
 maintainers of ancient discipline or liberty ; they would have made 
 almost any claim on his behalf. St. Thomas Aquinas says, in Lib. TV. 
 Sent. dist. 25. qu. I. art. i : 'Papa, qui habet plenitudinem potestatis 
 pontificalis, potest committere non episcopo ea quae ad episcopalem 
 dignitatem pertinent, dummodo ilia non habeant immediatam rela- 
 tionem ad verum corpus Christi. Et ideo ex eius commissione 
 aliquis sacerdos simpliciter potest conferre minores ordines 
 et confirmare, non autem aliquis non sacerdos; nee iterum 
 sacerdos maiores ordines, qui habent immediatam relationem ad 
 corpus Christi, supra quod consecrandum papa non habet maiorem 
 potestatem quam simplex sacerdos.'
 
 344 Christian Ministry. 
 
 F. 
 
 THE THEORY OF THE MINISTRY HELD BY 
 AMBROSIASTER, JEROME, ETC. 
 
 THE position explained above (pp. 157-163) is to be here justified 
 by quotations. 
 
 I. AMBROSIASTER. (a) His theory of ordination and the priesthood. 
 in I Tim. iv. 14 : ' Gratiam dari ordinationis significat [Paulus] per 
 prophetiam et manuum impositionem. . . . manus vero impositiones 
 verba sunt mystica quibus confirmatur ad hoc opus electus, accipiens 
 auctoritatem teste conscientia sua ut audeat vice Domini sacrificium 
 Deo offerre.' Cf. the reason why Christian 'levitae et sacerdotes ' 
 should abstain from the indulgences of marriage (in i Tim. iii. 13) ; 
 'Dei antistes' (in I Tim. v. 19); * in huius persona totius populi 
 salus consistit ' (in I Tim. vi. 16) ; ' vicarius Christi ' (in 2 Tim, i. 9) ; 
 ' actores Dei ' (in I Tim. iii. 13). He holds, however, that the original 
 arrangements in regard to the ministry were freer than those which 
 prevailed subsequently. ' When Churches had been established in all 
 places and officers appointed, arrangements were made different from 
 those with which things had begun. At first all used to teach and 
 all to baptize, on whatever days and at whatever time there was 
 opportunity. ... So that the people might increase and be multi- 
 plied, all at the beginning were allowed to preach the Gospel and 
 baptize and explain the Scriptures in Church ; but when the Church 
 embraced all places, places of meeting [conventicula] were estab- 
 lished and rulers [rectores] and other offices in the Churches 
 appointed, that none of the clergy who had not been ordained to it 
 should venture to take to himself an office which he knows not to 
 have been committed or granted to him. ' l There is thus a difference 
 between modern and ancient arrangements. But even this very primi- 
 tive practice of the earliest beginnings of the Church did not mean 
 an indiscriminate condition of things. Even in the earliest days, we 
 are told in the same passage, there were apostles, prophets, evan- 
 gelists (who ' are deacons and not priests ') and so on. Nor does he 
 include among the things permitted to all, even for a time, the 
 sacerdotal functions of sacrifice or laying-on of hands. 2 
 
 1 in Eph. iv. u, 12. 
 
 2 He uses the general Christian priesthood only as a ground for the position that * 
 all Christian people can become priests (i.e. in the ministry) : ' In lege nascebantur 
 sacerdotes ex genere Aaron Levitae ; nunc autem omnes ex genere sunt sacerdotali 
 
 . . . ideoque ex populo potest fieri sacerdos(/.c.).
 
 Note F. 345 
 
 (b) His recognition of the divine authority of the episcopate and of 
 the principle of succession. ' In episcopo omnes ordines sunt, quia 
 primus sacerdos est, hoc est, princeps est sacerdotum et propheta et 
 evangelista et cetera adimplenda officia ecclesiae in ministerio fide- 
 Hum' (in Eph. iv. n) ; 'in episcopo omnium ordinationum dignitas 
 est' (in I Cor. i. 17) ; ' et quia ab uno Deo Patre sunt omnia, singulos 
 episcopos singulis ecclesiis praeesse decrevit ' (in I Cor. xii. 28) ; 
 'Paulus et Timotheus utique episcopi erant' (in Phil. i. i) ; Archippus 
 was a bishop (in Col. iv. 17) ; the Apostles were bishops (in Eph. 
 iv. 1 1, in i Cor. xii. 28). St. Paul is so exact in his directions in the 
 Pastoral Epistles not from anxiety for Timothy, but on account of 
 his successors, that they might observe the ordination of the Church, 
 and that they too, who in their turn hand on the form to their suc- 
 cessors, might begin from themselves, Le. in spiritual discipline (in 
 i Tim. vi. 1 6). Whatever changes were made were made under the 
 authority of an (apostolic) council : ' immutata est ratio prospiciente 
 concilio.' 1 
 
 (c) His theory of the original identity of bishops and presbyters. 
 1 Timotheum presbyterum a se creatum episcopum vocat [sc. Paulus], 
 quia primi presbyteri [i.e. chief presbyters] episcopi appellabantur, 
 ut recedente eo sequens ei succederet. Denique apud Aegyptum 
 presbyteri consignant, si praesens non sit episcopus. Sed quia coe- 
 perunt sequentes presbyteri indigni inveniri ad primatus retinendos, 
 immutata est ratio prospiciente concilio, ut non ordo sed meritum 
 crearet episcopum multorum sacerdotum iudicio constitutum, ne in- 
 dignus temere usurparet et esset multis scandalum' (in Eph. iv. 12). 
 Here it is implied that at one period the difference of presbyter and 
 bishop was not one of ' order ' but only of selection. Again, when he 
 has to account for St. Paul passing from the bishop to the deacon 
 (i Tim. iii. 10), he writes thus: ' Quare, nisi quia episcopi et 
 presbyteri una ordinatio est? Uterque enim sacerdos est, sed 
 episcopus primus est, ut omnis episcopus presbyter sit, non tamen 
 omnis presbyter episcopus ; hie enim episcopus est, qui inter presby- 
 teros primus est. Denique Timotheum presbyterum ordinatum signi- 
 ficat ; sed quia ante se alterum non habebat, episcopus erat. Unde 
 et quemadmodum episcopum ordinet, ostendit ; neque enim fas erat 
 aut licebat, ut inferior ordinaret maiorem ; nemo enim tribuit, quod 
 non accepit.' A little further, on ver. 13: ' Nunc autem septem 
 diaconos esse oportet et aliquantos presbyteros, ut bini sint per 
 ecclesias, et unus in civitate episcopus.' 
 
 Take this language altogether, and I think we shall draw the con- 
 clusion that the commenta,tor did indeed minimize the distinction of 
 grade within the sacerdotium. But I do not think we have any 
 
 1 Cf. Lightfoot Dissert, p. 203, n. s .
 
 346 Christian Ministry. 
 
 reason to suppose that he would have regarded the presbyters of his 
 own day as possessing, under any circumstances, the power which the 
 earliest presbyters possessed ; because the ordinations in his own day 
 were distinct, and the presbyter who attempted to lay on hands would 
 do what is, in his words (in Eph. iv. n), 'praesumere officium quod 
 sciret non sibi creditum vel concessum.' 
 
 II. The AUTHOR OF THE QUAESTIONES probably the same 
 ' Ambrosiaster ' at any rate uses the same idea of the ministry (in 
 Qu. ci) in order to castigate in the spirit of Jerome the Roman 
 deacons. He says : ' in Alexandria et apud totam Aegyptum, si 
 desit episcopus, consecrat presbyter.' There is another reading 
 however consignat, as in the commentaries. Whichever word is 
 used the reference is to confirmation ; cf. Isidor. Hispal. de Eccl. Off. 
 ii. 25 ' unctione chrismatis consecrari' (of those who are con- 
 firmed), and see s. v. in Ducange Gloss. Med. et Inf. Latin. Con- 
 signo is the regular word for confirmation, but is never used for 
 ordination. 
 
 III. JEROME repeats the theory of the commentator, adding to it 
 the remark discussed above about the Alexandrian election to the 
 episcopate. 
 
 (a) His sacerdotalism. Jerome is a great sacerdotalist. He believes 
 indeed in the priesthood of the laity (adv. Lucifer. 4 : ' sacerdotium 
 laici, id est baptisma'), but not in such sense as militates against even 
 an extreme sacerdotalism (ib. 21). Twice in his works the idea 
 occurs 'a priest can intercede for a layman, but, if a priest falls, who 
 can intercede for him?' (ib. 5, Ep. xiv ad Heliodorum 9.) Again 
 and again he dwells on the sacerdotal authority and sacrificial function. 
 
 (b) His recognition of the apostolic aiithority of the episcopate. 
 ' Ecclesia multis gradibus consistens ad extremum diaconis, presby- 
 teris, episcopis finitur ' (adv. Lucifer. 22); 'quid facit excepta 
 ordinatione episcopus quod presbyter non faciat? omnes [episcopi] 
 . . . apostolorum successores sunt ' (Ep. cxlvi ad Evangelum). The 
 present monepiscopal constitution is attributed to (apostolic) decree (on 
 Titus i. S) : ' in toto orbe decretum est.' The Apostles are represented 
 as ordaining bishops and priests : ' quod fecerunt et apostoli, per 
 singulas provincias presbyteros et episcopos ordinantes' (in Matt. 
 xxv. 26). 
 
 (c) His theory of the original identity of bishops and presbyters. 
 This he (Ep. cxlvi ad Evangelum) proves from the language of Scrip- 
 ture, and continues : ' quod autem postea unus electus est qui ceteris 
 praeponeretur, in schismatis remedium factum est ; ne unusquisque ad 
 se trahens Christi ecclesiam rumperet.' Then follows the passage 
 about Alexandria, and the conclusion just quoted, 'quid facit, excepta 
 ordinatione etc.?' So to the same effect in Tit. i. 5: 'Idem est
 
 Note F. 347 
 
 presbyter qui episcopus. At first communi presbyterorum 
 concilio ecclesiae gubernaban tur ; then factions arose, 'I am 
 of Paul,' etc. On this account in toto orbe decretum est ut 
 unus de presbyteris electus superponeretur ceteris. He 
 would therefore have the bishops in his own day recognise that se 
 magis consuetudine quam dispositionis dominicae veritate 
 presbyteris esse maiores.' Of course this is strong language. St. 
 Jerome does not measure words when his temper is up, as it was 
 with bishops. But even so I do not think it can be fairly taken to 
 mean that Jerome ever held a presbyter of his own day to be the same 
 as a bishop, even in an extreme case. The conclusion he draws in the 
 text is only that bishops should govern the Church 'in commune, 
 i.e. with the co-operation of the presbyters, in imitation of Moses, 
 who, when he had it in his power to rule the people alone, chose 
 seventy elders to judge the people with him.' Once again he says, in 
 the Dial. adv. Lucifer. 9 : ' Ecclesiae salus in summi sacerdotis 
 dignitate pendet : cui si non exsors quaedam et ab omnibus eminens 
 detur potestas, tot in ecclesiis eflficiuntur schismata quot sacerdotes.' 
 He still makes the distinctive powers of the bishop to have had their 
 origin in moral necessities, but those necessities were paramount, and 
 the result of the change involved in the limitation of the episcopate is 
 one that cannot be reversed. 
 
 IV. LATER LATIN WRITERS. Certainly it was in the sense of an 
 original, not of a present, identity of the episcopate and the presby- 
 terate, that St. Jerome's influence and authority impressed his view on 
 late Latin authors. 1 It is desirable to illustrate this by quotations. 
 
 ISIDORE OF SEVILLE, c. A.D. 630, in his de Eccl. Off. ii. 7 (ap. 
 Hittorp. p. 22) quotes St. Paul to show 'presbyterum etiam sub 
 episcopi nomine taxari ' ; he says ' secundus et paene coniunctus 
 gradus [sc. presbyterorum] est.' On the other hand he clearly dis- 
 tinguishes the orders (ii. 26) : ' Presbyteri, licet sint sacerdotes, ponti- 
 ficatus tamen apicem non habent. Hoc autem solis pontificibus deberi, 
 ut vel consignent vel paracletum Spiritum tradant, quod non solum 
 ecclesiastica consuetudo demonstrat, verum et superior ilia lectio 
 apostolorum [i.e. Acts viii. 14 f.].' Cf. also ii. 5, which is quite clear, 
 and makes only bishops in the later sense the successors of the 
 Apostles. 
 
 (Pseudo) ALBINUS FLACCUS, gth century, in the de Div. Off. (ap. 
 Hittorp. p. 72) distinguishes the powers of bishop and presbyter. He 
 goes on to say that formerly the names were used indiscriminately, i.e. 
 
 1 St. Augnstin admitted, at any rate by implication, the change of nomenclature, 
 Ep. Ixxxii ad ffieron. 33 : ' Quamquam secundum honorum vocabula quae iam 
 ecclesiae usus obtinuit episcopatus presbyterio maior sit, tamen in multis rebus 
 Augustinus Hieronymo minor est.'
 
 348 Christian Ministry. 
 
 in the New Testament, ' sed postmodum utili satis provisione constitu- 
 tum est, ut hoc nomen [i.e. episcopus] solis pontificibus tribuatur, 
 quorum maioris gradus excellentia crescat et minor ordo mensurae suae 
 limitem recognoscat, sitque differentia in vocabulis sicut praecelsior 
 locus honoris. ' This means, I think, that there had always been a 
 difference of grade which produced a distinction of name. He after- 
 wards (p. 74) quotes Jerome's account of the early Alexandrian mode 
 of electing a bishop. 
 
 AMALARIUS, bishop of Treves, gth century, in his de Eccl. Off. ii. 
 13 (ap. Hittorp. p. 165), holds about the same language, i.e. he 
 recognises community of names in New Testament, and quotes Jerome 
 on the Epistle to Titus and on the Alexandrian election of bishops. 
 But he also assumes an original distinction of office, and makes the 
 successors of the Apostles take from the lower grade its name of 
 ' bishop,' because they would not arrogate to themselves the title of 
 apostles ; so that those were called bishops ' qui et ordinationis 
 praediti potestate.' 
 
 RABANUS MAURUS, Qth century, quotes Jerome and Isidore and 
 recognises the original community of names in New Testament ' sub 
 episcoporum nomine presbyteros complexus est f Paulus] ' but keeps 
 the distinction of offices clear (de Inst. Cler. \. 4. 6, ap. Hittorp. pp. 
 313, 315). He makes eight gradus in the Church, the chief being 
 bishop, priest, and deacon, and three ordines clergy, laity, and monks. 
 
 Gieseler, Eccl. Hist. 30 [Eng. trans, i. p. 88], quotes a remark- 
 able expression of Jerome's position from BERNALDUS OF CONSTANCE, 
 c. A.D. 1088. He affirms that presbyters actually had 'antiquitus' 
 [i.e. presumably in the apostolic age] episcopal powers, and this as a 
 matter of certainty 'habuisse non dubitantur.' He goes on: ' Post- 
 quam autem presbyteri ab episcopali excellentia cohibiti sunt, coepit 
 eis non licere quod licuit, videlicet quod ecclesiastica auctoritas solis 
 pontificibus exequendum delegavit. ' * 
 
 Gieseler gives other mediseval references : but the effect of his whole 
 note is to produce an erroneous impression. It is not the case that the 
 ancient Church in general made little distinction between bishops and 
 presbyters ; that this mode of thought survived more or less into the 
 Middle Ages ; and that it was finally suppressed by the theology of 
 Trent, while the Protestants returned to the ancient doctrine. I hope 
 I have shown that this is not the case. The fact is that medkeval 
 writers who minimized the distinction of bishops and presbyters did so 
 either to exalt the dignity of the sacrificial priesthood which is 
 common to both, or in simple deference to Jerome's authority, or 
 with the intention of magnifying the papal prerogative (see App. 
 Note E, p. 377). 
 
 1 Cf. also Morinus de S. Ord. p. iii. ex. iii. 2. 8 f.
 
 Note G. 349 
 
 G. 
 
 THE LAYING-ON OF HANDS. 
 
 IT is plain that the conclusions arrived at on pp. 168-180 depend 
 mainly on the question whether we have evidence to justify the state- 
 ment that the ministers of the Church were from the first solemnly 
 ordained by laying-on of hands and that a special gift of the Holy 
 Ghost was believed to accompany the ceremony. The following is a 
 summary of the evidence on this point. 
 
 Assuming the historical trustworthiness of the Acts and the Pastoral 
 Epistles, we have evidence that the laying-on of apostolic hands was 
 the method of imparting the gift of the Spirit. It was also, as a 
 natural consequence, the method of ordination to church office. So 
 the seven are ordained, Acts vi. 6 Tpoffevd/j.fvoi ftr^OriKav avrots ras 
 Xps- So Paul and Barnabas have hands laid on them by the prophets 
 of Antioch, Acts xiii. 3 this however to send them on a special mission, 
 rather than appoint them to an office. So St. Paul, in company with 
 the presbytery, ordained Timothy (i Tim. iv. 14; 2 Tim. i. 6), and he 
 writes to him that he ' stir up the gift that is in him by the laying-on 
 of hands.' He also implies that Timothy will use the same ceremony 
 in ordaining other clergy (i Tim. v. 22). Thus, as in the case of 
 baptism, the Church gave a new meaning, a new reality, to an old 
 Jewish rite. 1 
 
 It was not likely that an apostolic practice would become disused. 
 Ordination or appointment is, of course, constantly mentioned without 
 any specification of the method, in the early Church as amongst our- 
 selves. 2 But we have in each century evidence to assure us of what the 
 method was. 
 
 Thus in the second century the Ebionite Clementines represent 
 St Peter as ordaining bishops, and by implication priests and deacons, 
 by laying-on of hands (Horn. iii. 72, with the prayer that God would 
 give the bishop the authority to bind and loose aright ; Recog. iii. 66 ; 
 Ep. Clem. 2, 19). 
 
 In the third century we have evidence that Origen was so ordained : 
 tiri TTJV 'EXXdSa ffTftXAfJXVos rr\v dia Ha\aiffTii>i)s, irpfff^vrepiov Xfipo- 
 0e<rlaj> & Kaurapfiq. xpoj TUV rfjSe tiruriciiiruv dvaXa/z/fcu'a (ap. Euseb. 
 
 1 Cf. Loening Gemeindeverfassvng pp. 72 ff. 
 
 2 Thus, e.g., Theodoret, who had, as we shall see, very clear ideas as to the 
 method and effect of ordination, speaks simply of a bishop bringing a man to the 
 altar and ' enrolling him in the priesthood ' without his knowing it ; elsewhere, in a 
 similar case, he describes how it was done (Kelig. Hist, xiii, xix).
 
 Christian Ministry. 
 
 H. E. vi. 23) ; and he implies that this was the method by which 
 bishops were consecrated in his day (see above, p. 127). Cyprian, as 
 will be seen immediately, and the African author of de Aleatoribus, 
 assure us that this was the method of episcopal ordination in Africa, 
 and Novatian's schismatical ordination lets us see that it was so also at 
 Rome. The canons of Hippolytus give us the same assurance in the 
 case of all three orders. (See above, pp. 132 f.) 
 
 We need not give many later instances. The witness of the 
 Prayers of Bp. Serapion, of Gregory (in his account of Basil's death- 
 bed), of Basil himself, and of Lucifer and others, in the West, has been 
 quoted already (pp. 331, 146, 156, 159, 176 n. 1 ). When Chrysostom, 
 still later, is explaining the expression titiQt\K.a.v oi)rots rots x e 'P a ' in 
 Acts vi. 6 (Horn. xiv. 3), he says : ' This is the x ei P orov ^ a ' the hand 
 of the man is laid upon the other ; but all the working is of God, and 
 His hand it is which touches the head of him who is ordained, if he be 
 ordained aright.' Jerome too interprets x et P OTOV ^ a in Latin as ' extentus 
 digitus,' and explains it as ' ordinatio clericorum quae non solum 
 ad imprecationem vocis sed ad impositionem impletur manus ' (in fsai. 
 Iviii. 10). 
 
 In none of these cases is there any controversial stress laid on the 
 rite. It is simply assumed as the Church's method of ordination. 
 
 It has been affirmed, however, by Dr. Hatch that the rite was not 
 universal, and argued that ' it is impossible that, if it was not universal, 
 it can have been regarded as essential ' (B. L. p. 134). Let us consider, 
 then, the supposed cases in which it is absent. 
 
 I. ' Nor is the rite mentioned in the enumeration which Cyprian 
 gives of the elements which had combined to make the election of 
 Cornelius valid : it was of importance to show that no essential par- 
 ticular had been omitted, but he enumerates only the votes of the 
 people, the testimony of the clergy, the consent of the bishops.' This 
 is not the case. It is quite true that Cyprian is emphasizing the due 
 election of Cornelius by the community to prove that his consecration 
 was not ' done in a corner.' But while he says * : ' factus est Cornelius 
 de Dei et Christi eius iudicio, de clericorum paene omnium testimonio, 
 etc.,' he also says just before : ' factus est episcopus a plurimis collegis 
 nostris qui tune in urbe Roma aderant.' Cornelius was made a bishop 
 by other bishops on the basis of a due election. How then was he 
 made? By laying-on of hands, no doubt. That this was the 
 recognised method in the contemporary Roman Church we have indis- 
 putable evidence, for Novatian, Cornelius' rival, had to get himself so 
 consecrated. So Cornelius himself tells Fabian of Antioch : ' He com- 
 pelled certain boorish and ignorant bishops to give him the episcopate 
 with a laying-on of hands which was shadowy and vain ' (because it 
 i Ep. lv. 8.
 
 Note G, 351 
 
 was uncanonical). 1 In a letter of Cyprian's too, where he is explain- 
 ing why the presence and assent of the people and the bishops is 
 necessary to a duly conducted episcopal consecration, he says : ' All 
 this took place in the ordination among you of our colleague Sabinus, 
 so that it was by the vote of the whole brotherhood, and the judgment 
 of the bishops, that the episcopate was given him and hands laid upon 
 him in Basilides" room.' 2 To 'lay on hands' is a synonym for to 
 give the episcopate. 
 
 2. ' In entire harmony with this [omission of the laying-on of hands] 
 is the account which Jerome gives of the admission to office of the 
 bishop of Alexandria : after the election the presbyters conduct the 
 elected bishop to his chair : he is thereupon bishop de facto. ' Quite so. 
 This is Jerome's account of it. And because this is all that he thinks 
 occurred, he and those who follow him would not describe it as a 
 distinct ordination. There was, they say, originally only one ordina- 
 tion to the priesthood, i.e. that which made a man a presbyter, after 
 which he became a bishop by mere nomination. 
 
 3. In a similar way Synesius, Ep. 67, p. 210, by his use of the 
 phrase etjroSetfa:' re /cat ivl TOU 0p6vov Kadlvai, appears to consider the 
 announcement of election, followed by enthronization, as the con- 
 stitutive elements of the ordination of a bishop' (I.e. p. 134 n. 46 . 
 dtroSei^ai often means ' to constitute ' or ' to make ' ; and if Dr. Hatch 
 had read the previous letter he would have seen that it means ' to 
 make by laying-on of hands. ' See p. 206, where it is said that one 
 inrb TU 
 
 4. Dr. Hatch quotes (pseudo) Albinus Flaccus as denying that the 
 laying-on of hands was part of the traditional mode of making a bishop 
 elsewhere or at Rome ; for the passage see p. 336 n. 2 . What the 
 author must mean is to depreciate the authority in the West of the 
 imposition of the book of the Gospels. And whatever he means, we can 
 check him. Isidore of Seville, who is several centuries earlier, says : 
 4 Quod vero per manus impositionem a praecessoribus Dei sacerdotibus 
 episcopi ordinantur, antiqua institutio est ' (de Eccl. Off. ii. 5) ; and 
 refers the rite back to patriarchal and apostolic days. We have also 
 the evidence of Lucifer and of the practice of the Roman Church in 
 the third century. 
 
 5. ' There is the remarkable fact that the passage of the Apostolical 
 Constitutions which describes with elaborate minuteness the other cere- 
 monies with which a bishop was admitted to office, says nothing of this ' 
 
 1 ap. Euseb. H.E. vi. 43. See also Cornelius' letter to Cyprian (Ep. xlix. i) : the 
 confessors said they had been deluded ' ut paterentur ei manum quasi in episcopatum 
 imponi.' 
 
 - Ep. Ixvii. 5.
 
 352 Christian Ministry. 
 
 (? r 33)- This is the only apparently strong point in Dr. Hatch's plea. 
 The passage (referred to above, p. 137) describes a solemn rite by which 
 a man is consecrated to a priestly office. Three bishops stand before 
 the altar, others with the presbyters praying in silence, and ' while the 
 deacons hold the divine Gospels open upon the head of him who is 
 being ordained (xeiporovovidvov), the chief bishop offers a long prayer of 
 consecration. At the end of which ' one of the bishops is to lift up the 
 sacrifice (i.e. the oblation) upon the head of him who has been ordained 
 (XfipoTovrjOtvros) and on the morrow he is to be enthroned.' Are we to 
 conclude that there is here represented a consecration without laying- 
 on of hands ? This is very improbable because ( I ) the ceremony is 
 specified in the case of the bishop, as of the presbyter and deacon, in the 
 canons of Hippolytus and in the Egyptian Church ordinances upon which 
 the ordinal in the Constitutions is based. (2) it is specified in the Con- 
 stitutions in the case of the deacon and presbyter. (3) In the same 
 book of the Constitutions (viii. 46) a passage occurs sufficient to dis- 
 prove the hypothesis : fore yap irdvrus eiruiKtnrovs trap' TJ/M^V ovo^a- 
 KO.I Trpefffivrtpovs Kol diaicbvovs ei/xv Ka ' %etpw' eirtBtcrei, rij 
 T&V 6i>ofj.aT(ai> Kal TTJV 5ia<popai> ruiv Trpayfj-aruv deiKvtiovras' 
 ov yap 6 /Soi/Xd/uepoj Trap' i)fuv tTr^pov rijv x e ?P a [i-e. was consecrated] 
 . .. . dXX' 6 Ka\6vfj.et>os VTT(> TOV Oeov ' bishops and presbyters and 
 deacons were appointed by prayer and the laying-on of hands.' Presum- 
 ably, therefore, in the rite as described the laying-on of hands is implied 
 in the word -xeipoTovetv. The word was supposed, in the fourth 
 century at least (see quotations from Chrysostom and Jerome p. 350), 
 to have that implication. * Also, it should be noticed, ' manual acts ' 
 are often omitted in early sacrament aries. Thus the directions for the 
 manual act of laying on hands is omitted in some of the accounts of 
 the rite of ordination in the Ordo Romanus ; e.g. ap. Hittorp. p. 31 
 we have simply ' consecrat illos,' although a late date is indicated by 
 the mention of the incense being blessed, the introits, the litany, the 
 vestments ; cf. ib. p. 107. On the other hand it is specified in an 
 ' ordinal ' which Dr. Hatch (Diet. Chr. Ant. s.v.) thinks represents one 
 of the earliest remaining western types (Hittorp. p. 88 ; Martene, Ordo 
 ix, Ant. Eccl. Ritus ii. p. 151). It is not specified in Martene's Ordo 
 i (I.e. p. 86 f.), nor in a very brief order in Muratori Lit. Rom. Vet. 
 i. p. 512 f., nor in the Maronite rite (in Morinus de S. Ord. p. ii. 
 p. 419 f.). It is only later that ' ritualia,' giving complete rubrical 
 directions, are written. 
 
 1 Apost. Const, viii. 28 distinguishes x ei P ^ e ' re ^> i- e - to give certain benedictions 
 of penitents, from x 'poToi/eii' = ' to ordain.' x 'P TOI/6 "' is a technical term for one 
 special sort of laying-on of hands.
 
 Note G. 353 
 
 Now what was the significance attached to this laying-on of hands ? 1 
 
 It was conceived of as giving ministerial authority, and not only 
 authority, but something which accompanied the authority a gift of 
 special grace empowering a man for its exercise. 
 
 Thus, in the fifth century, Theodoret, bishop of Cyrus, the literalist 
 interpreter of a temper which Dr. Newman characterizes as ' English,' 
 no less than the mystic writer who passes for Dionysius, believed that 
 the laying-on of hands conveyed a specific grace of order. He believed 
 this even when the rite was administered to a man without his know- 
 ledge. He records (Relig. Hist, xix) how a bishop, wishing to ordain 
 a recluse, got into his cell by surreptitious means and ' laid his hand 
 on him and performed the prayer and then spoke at length to him and 
 made plain to him the grace which had come upon him.' He regarded 
 the grace as given by the laying-on of hands in virtue of the prayer 
 which invoked the Spirit. 'We ought,' he says, commenting on 
 i Tim. v. 22, ' first to examine the life of the man who is being 
 ordained, and so to invoke upon him (KoiKeiv fir' abr6i>) the grace of 
 the Spirit.' 
 
 In the fourth century we have found St. Gregory of Nazianzus 
 conceiving with great richness of thought of the effect of ordination ; 
 and speaking of St. Basil on his deathbed as 'giving his hand and the 
 Spirit- in ordination of the most genuine of his followers.' So 
 St. Basil himself, speaking of those who had left the Church, says : ' they 
 had no longer the grace of the Holy Spirit upon them ; its com- 
 munication failed when the succession was broken off (ry SIO.KOKTJKU 
 TT)v a.Ko\ov9iav). For those who first went into schism had their ordina- 
 tions from the fathers, and through the laying-on of their hands they 
 
 1 Dr. Hatch has endeavoured to minimize it (B. L. p. 135 and Diet. Ckr. Ant. ii. 
 p. 1508). Jerome no doubt says that the value of the outward rite lay, in one 
 respect, in its preventing the possibility of people being ordained without their 
 knowing it : ' ordinatio clericorum non solum ad imprecationem vocis sed ad imposi- 
 tionem impletur manus, ne scilicet, ut in quibusdam risimus, vocis imprecatio 
 clandestina clericos ordinet nescientes ' (in fsai. Iviii. x) a function which it fulfilled 
 but imperfectly, as we know from some curious stories of Theodoret (Relig. Hist. 
 xiii, xix). But it was much more than this to Jerome, as we have seen ; the whole 
 rite made a man a priest, with sacerdotal powers and authority. St. Augustin also 
 says (de Bapt. iii. 16. 21): 'Quid est aliud [manus impositio] nisi oratio super 
 hominem ? ' But he is not speaking of ordination. The laying-on of hands in 
 ordination did, according to Augustin, see p. 194, ' impose a sacrament ' which was 
 indelible. The pseudo-Dionysius sees in the laying-on of hands more than ' fatherly 
 sheltering and subjection to God': it en<j>a.ivei TTJV TeAerapx'*'?*' <r'inji, v^* 
 fa . . . ci? Kai Svvafjuv iepariKi)!/ cSajpoufie'i'T)?, K.T.\. (ap. Morinus de S. 
 Ord. p. ii. p. 58.) 
 
 - The early Church did not use the imperative formula, ' Receive the Holy 
 Ghost.' St. Augustin certainly* implies this (de Trin. xv. 26). But no more is 
 implied in this formula than in saying, ' I baptize,' or (as St. Gregory in this case) 
 ' he gives the Holy Spirit.' 
 
 z
 
 354 Christian Ministry. 
 
 had the spiritual gift ; but those who broke off, having become laymen, 
 had neither the authority to baptize nor to ordain, being no longer 
 able to impart to others the grace of the Holy Spirit, from which they 
 had themselves fallen.' 1 We have already heard St. Athanasius ex- 
 plaining to the recalcitrant Dracontius, that in being ordained he had 
 received a grace of the Spirit, which was in him whether he liked it 
 or no, and for the exercise of which he was responsible. The prayer 
 for the ordination of a bishop in the Apostolical Constitutions runs : 
 ' Thyself [O God], now by the mediation of Thy Christ, pour out through 
 us [theordaining bishops] the power of Thy ruling Spirit' (5t' T\V.UV lirlxte 
 rr)v dtjvafuf rod ijye/j.ovi.Ko6 <rov irvujfjLaros, viii. 5). St Peter in the 
 Clementine Homilies is represented as laying-on hands and invoking 
 for him who is being made bishop the authority to bind and loose 
 aright (Horn. iii. 72 ; cf. Ep. Clem. 2). 
 
 When we turn to the West we find a similar set of conceptions 
 attached to the ordination of the clergy. The author of the Quaes- 
 t zones in Vet. et Nov. Test, speaks thus (Qu. xciii) : ' When the Lord 
 is said to have breathed on the disciples a few days after his resur- 
 rection and to have said ' Receive iy e the Holy Ghost,' He is under- 
 stood to have been conveying ecclesiastical power (ecclesiastica potestas 
 collata intelligitur esse) : and because it really belongs to ecclesiastical 
 authority (ad ius ecclesiasticum), He adds ' Whose sins ye retain,' etc. 
 This inbreathing of Christ is a certain grace, which by succession is 
 infused into those who are ordained (per traditionem infunditur 
 ordinatis), by which they are made more acceptable.' He then quotes 
 St. Paul's words to Timothy ( I Tim. iv. 14) and explains that this outward 
 act of Christ was enacted ' ut ex eo traditioni ecclesiasticae Spiritus 
 sanctus infusus credatur.' The contemporary Ambrosiaster, writing 
 also from Rome, speaks more definitely (see App. Note F) of the 'grace 
 of ordination ' as attached to the laying-on of hands. ' He only,' says 
 Lucifer (de S. Athan. i. 9), ' can be filled with the -virtue of the Holy 
 Spirit for the governing of His people, whom God has chosen, and on 
 whom hands have been laid by the catholic bishops, as Moses' hand was 
 laid upon Joshua.' We have seen that St. Cyprian understood by 
 ordination the laying-on of hands and that he regarded ordination, 
 when rightly administered in the Church, as bestowing sacerdotal 
 authority. His conception is illustrated by that of another African 
 bishop, the author of the de Aleatoribus, 'Since we bishops have 
 through the laying-on of hands received the same Holy Spirit within 
 the shelter of our breast, let us cause no sadness to Him who dwells 
 within us.' 2 Before Cyprian, the great theologian Hippolytus uses the 
 
 1 Ep. cbcxxviii. 
 
 2 De Aleut, c. 3, ' Quoniam episcopi idem [?eundem] Spiritum sanctum per im- 
 positionem manus cordis excepimus hospitio, cohabitatori nostro nullam maestitiam
 
 Note H. 355 
 
 following language as to the relation of the Holy Ghost to the ministry 
 (Ref. Omn. Haer. proem.): 'No other will refute these errors save 
 the Holy Ghost given in the Church, which the Apostles first received 
 and then imparted to right believers ; and forasmuch as we are their 
 successors, sharing the same grace and high priesthood and teaching 
 and accounted guardians of the Church, we shall not suffer our eyes to 
 sleep.' The same idea prevails in the ' canons ' ascribed to him, p. 132. 
 Irenaeus also regards church officers as endowed with special spiritual 
 gifts ; he speaks of ' the presbyters who hold the succession from the 
 Apostles, who with the succession of the episcopate have received the 
 sure gift of truth (charisma veritatis) according to the good pleasure 
 of the Father ' (iv. 26. 2). ' God, says St. Paul, hath put in the 
 Church first apostles, secondly prophets, thirdly teachers ; where, 
 then, the gifts of the Lord have been put, there we should learn the 
 truth' (iv. 26. 5). Lastly, though Clement of Rome does not, any 
 more than Irenaeus, allude to the ceremony of ordination, he 
 connects the mission of the ministry with that one mission by which 
 ' Christ is from God, and the Apostles from Christ ' (c. 42). Such, 
 then, is the continuous conception of churchmen in respect of the grace 
 of ordination and the right of laying-on of hands ; and it has its origin 
 in the simple and decisive expressions of the New Testament. 
 
 H. 
 
 MONTANISM. 
 (See pp. 
 
 THE true nature of Montanism seems to emerge very clearly from an 
 examination of the ancient writings bearing on it, which are not of very 
 considerable bulk. They are mainly (i) the anti-Montanist writers of 
 the second, or early third, century, quoted by Eusebius H. . v. 16-19 > 
 (ii) Didymus de Trin. especially iii. 41 ; (iii) Epiphanius Haer. xlviii 
 (both these writers drawing on more ancient sources) ; and (iv) the 
 Montanist writings of Tertullian, its chief western advocate. There 
 are also important references in Hippolytus Kef. Omn. Haer. viii. 19 ; 
 and pseudo-Tertull. de Praescr. ad fin. Other references are collected, 
 and all the sources analysed, in Bonwetsch's admirable Gesch. des 
 Montanismus I ; cf. also Harnack Dogmengesch. i. pp. 318-330; 
 and Diet. Chr. Biog. s.v. MONTANUS (Dr. Salmon). 
 
 proponamus.' This tract has been edited by Harnack (Texte u. Untersuch. V. i), 
 and by him assigned to Victor, bishop of Rom, c. A.D. 195, but it is more probably 
 by an African bishop.
 
 356 Christian Ministry. 
 
 From these authorities it appears 
 
 I. That the primary claim of Montanus and his followers was that 
 of supernatural inspiration. Montanus claimed to be a passive organ 
 through which Almighty God spoke apparently even to be Almighty 
 God, in the sense that his voice was God's voice. A similar claim was 
 made by his prophetesses, Prisca (Priscilla) and Maximilla. In this 
 consisted the New Prophecy (Epiphan. Haer. xlviii. n, 12; Didymus 
 de Trin. iii. 41 ; and the anonymous presbyter ap, Euseb. H. E. v. i6). x 
 The inspired utterances of these first Montanist prophets were collected 
 and reckoned by the Montanists as additional scriptures (ffwraTTtiv 
 KCUPCIS 7/>a0ds, Euseb. H. E. vi. 20); Tertullian constantly quotes them 
 as inspired oracles (see de Exh. Cast. 10 ; de Res. Cam. 1 1 ; de F^tga 
 9, II ; de Pud. 21 ; adv. Prax. 8, 30; adv. Marc. iii. 24). If the 
 highest sort of inspiration was supposed to belong to these prophets 
 only (and the Fathers taunt them with the cessation of the gift), yet 
 ' revelations ' continued in the society. Tertullian quotes, to prove the 
 materiality of the soul, the visions of a ' spiritual ' sister who ' had the 
 gift of revelations ' (de An. 9). As claiming inspiration, the Montanists 
 claimed to be in a prophetic succession. They claimed to succeed to 
 the ancient prophets and to those of the new covenant (ap. Euseb. H. 
 E. v. l8). 2 They argued that their inspiration was only a new instance 
 of an old phenomenon (see the Montanist preface to the Passion of 
 Perpetua and Felicitas, and note especially ' things of later date are 
 to be esteemed of more account,' and the conclusion of the account). 
 The Church judged them on their claim. She 'tried the spirits,' and 
 decided that this was a case not of supernatural inspiration but of false 
 prophecy, or even demoniacal possession. As thus judged and con- 
 demned, they were excommunicated by the Asiatic Churches, and the 
 orthodox held them in such horror that under persecution they would 
 not even die with them (ap. Euseb. H. E. \. 16 ad fin.). They were 
 afterwards excommunicated at Rome also (see esp. Diet. Chr. Biog. 
 iii. pp. 936, 944). 
 
 The arguments used against the Montanist claims seem to have been 
 
 (a) that the prophetic gift failed with the death of the first claimants 
 to it (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 17) : 
 
 (b} that their prophecies of wars and revolutions and the speedy end 
 of the world did not come true (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 16, and Epiphan. 
 I.e. 2) : 
 
 1 The claim to speak with the voice of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost 
 indiscriminately, carried with it, according to Didymus, a confusion of the Divine 
 Persons (I.e. and elsewhere). Epiphanius, however (I.e. i), says the Montanists 
 were orthodox. The pseudo-Tertullian draws a distinction in this respect between 
 two sects. Tertullian makes their orthodoxy emphatic. 
 
 2 There is perhaps no reason to make this claim an afterthought, with Harnack 
 Dogmengesch. i. p. 323.
 
 Note H. 357 
 
 (c) the earliest and most important argument that whereas 
 prophecy in the Church was rational and the prophet intelligent 
 and conscious, Montanist prophecy was, on their own showing, an 
 irrational frenzy : cf. kv Karoxo TIVI Kal irapeKOTcurei ev6ov<nq.v . . . 
 ws (wl fvtpyovfitvip Kal Siafj.ovwvTt . . . TO fi\a\//i<ppov irvev/ia . . . 
 XoXeu' K<t>p6vws . . . a/j.eTpo<t>ui>ovs 7rpo0i}Toj (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 16, 
 17) ; cf. the title of (?) Alcibiades' anti-Montanist work, roO JUTJ Sfiv 
 vpo<^-ffri}v iv fKffTao-ft \a\eiv ; Epiphan. I.e. 3-7 ; and Tertullian's 
 expressions 'ecstasis . . . excessus sensus et amentiae instar," 'amentia 
 . . . spiritalis vis qua constat prophetia' (de. An. 45, 21, adv. 
 Marc. iv. 22). 
 
 It was, then, mainly on account of its irrational, ecstatic, and there- 
 fore unchristian, pagan character that Montanism was rejected. 1 The 
 point to observe is that the Church judged it on its claim. It claimed 
 to be a new, special, supernatural inspiration, and the Church decided, 
 not that such inspiration had ceased with the Apostles, but that these 
 people were not divinely inspired. The Church had contained men and 
 women recently whom it recognised as prophets, such as Quadratus 
 and Ammia. It would not recognise Montanus and Maximilla on 
 account of the character of their supposed 'gifts.' The Montanists 
 acknowledged their novel character (see Epiphan. I.e. 8 oi>x o^iota TO. 
 irpuTa xapt'o^tara TOIS ^o^dTotj a Montanist saying). No doubt this 
 repudiation of Montanist prophecy inclined the Church to regard the 
 prophetic gift as having altogether ceased. See Epiphan. I.e. 3. 
 Irenaeus, like Justin, speaks of prophecy as continuing in the Church : 
 ' we hear of many brethren in the Church having prophetic gifts ' 
 (ii. 32, 4, v. 6. l); cf. Justin Dial. c. Tryph. 82: irapa yap TIIUV Kal 
 fJ*XP l v v v Tfpo4>rjTLKO, xa.plffiui.Ta. fffTiv. The Muratorian fragment, on 
 the other hand, speaks of the ' completus numerus ' of the prophets ; 
 and Origen puts them almost wholly in the past, c. Cels. vii. 8 fx v7 l 
 iarlv airroO [the prophetic spirit] irap 6\iyois. Alcibiades, against the 
 Montanists (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 17), speaks of prophecy 'as remaining 
 in the whole Church until the second Coming,' but in what sense is not 
 plain. In any case that supernatural prophecy had ceased was not a 
 principle ; it was an experience. See on this the account Tertullian 
 gives of the rejection at Rome of the Montanist prophecy (adv. Prax. l). 
 If the Montanists taunted the Church with rejecting prophecy, the 
 Church replied : ' we do not believe you are inspired.' 
 
 2. Their prophecy claimed to be ' new ' in a special sense. The 
 Montanists claimed (says Didymus) ' that their leader had come, and 
 
 1 As a matter of fact Montanus probably brought his idea of inspiration from his 
 Phrygian paganism. He had been a pagan priest (Didymus I.e. 3) ; Jerome seems 
 to imply a priest of Cybele ' semivir ' (Ep. ad Marcell. xli). On the purely pagan 
 character of ' ecstasy ' see Bonwetsch I.e. pp. 65, 66.
 
 358 Christian Ministry. 
 
 had the completeness of the Spirit.'' The Spirit promised by Christ had 
 come in him. The age of the Spirit, through the Montanist revelations, 
 had superseded the hitherto imperfect Church. Didymus is at pains to 
 prove, as against them, that Montanus could not be greater than the 
 Apostles : that the Apostles had had the Spirit in His completeness 
 from Christ, and had imparted Him by laying-on of hands to the Church 
 (I.e. a). 1 Their claim finds very complete expression in Tertullian 
 (see above, pp. 191 ff. ). If he also claims that Montanism is a ' restitutio' 
 (de Monog. 4), this is only in the sense that it restores a severity of 
 discipline about second marriages, which the Apostles had allowed to 
 remain relaxed, owing to human weakness : it restored, that is to say, 
 th primeval severity of the divine intention, but it was even here an 
 advance on apostolic Christianity. See, on this new character of Mon- 
 tanist illumination, Harnack I.e. pp. 319-323, and Bonwetsch, esp. Die 
 Prophetic in apost. u. nachapost. Zeitalter in Zeitschr.f. k. Wissenschaft 
 u. k. Leben, Heft viii and ix, 1884. 
 
 3. However true it may be that some at least of the Montanist 
 claimants to prophetic inspiration were self-seeking charlatans (see 
 Apollonius ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 18), there is no reason to doubt that 
 Montanism was really, even at first, a movement in the direction of 
 ascetic puritanism. No doubt the establishment of the new Jeru- 
 salem in the ' little Phrygian cities of Pepuza and Timius, ' where 
 Montanus ' would have gathered together ' the children of the new dis- 
 pensation ' from all sides,' was one of the many attempts which church 
 history records to found a 'pure Church." There the elect expected 
 to behold the ' Jerusalem which is above ' descend from heaven 
 (Epiphan. I.e. 14). It was mainly the puritan rigorism of Mon- 
 tanism, with its special fasts (vrjffreiwv i>o/ju>6effla is a feature noticed 
 by Apollonius ap. Euseb. I.e.) and ascetic restrictions on marriage, 
 that commended it to the impatient zeal of Tertullian. There was no 
 doubt a tendency to worldliness, a ' Verweltlichung,' in the Church of 
 the third and fourth centuries, just so far as she was allowed to live at 
 ease, which accounts for, and in part excuses, if it cannot justify, the 
 outbreaks of puritan fanaticism which the history of the Church in those 
 centuries bears repeated witness to. 
 
 4. If men making a claim to inspiration would inevitably, in any 
 case, have a tendency to look down upon church officers who made no 
 such profession, much more were the repudiated and excommunicated 
 Montanist claimants put into the most marked hostility to the Church. 
 Their belief in the new dispensation of the Spirit tended to make them 
 regard the Church as antiquated ; in their puritanism they would have 
 regarded her as corrupt, perhaps as unchurched by corruption ; their 
 
 1 The Montanist claim is expressed otherwise thus : ' in apostolis Spiritum sanctum 
 fuisse, Parade turn non fuisse ' (pseudo-Tertull. de Praescr. 52).
 
 Note I. 359 
 
 expectations of an immediate irapovaia, made them disparage her 
 organization, which aimed at permanence. 1 Thus they would have 
 every motive for setting ' the Church of the Spirit ' against ' the Church 
 of the bishops,' for setting personal inspiration against official authority, 
 and ascetic severity against sacerdotal claims. As a fact their ascription 
 of the power of absolution to spiritual men in opposition to church 
 officers is a feature hinted at by Apollonius : ' who forgives sins 
 [amongst you Montanists] ? ' he asks in ridicule, ' does the prophet for- 
 give the thefts of the martyr, or the martyr the covetousness of the 
 prophet ? ' In Tertullian this feature appears more prominently ; see 
 p. 209 f. 
 
 I. 
 
 PROPHECY IN THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. 
 
 (See pp. 220, 244.) 
 
 THE words of Jesus Christ, ' all the prophets and the law prophesied 
 until John,' are clearly not to be understood as excluding prophecy 
 from His kingdom. If His own language is not without ambiguity, 2 
 yet in the apostolic writings the evidence is abundant. There are 
 prophets in the Church who rank only next to apostles : see Eph. iv. 
 II, iii. 5, ii. 20, I Cor. xii. 28, Acts xiii. I, xiv. 4, and xv. 32. We 
 should gather that not all persons who received at one moment or 
 another the gift of prophecy, as in Acts xix. 6, would have ranked as 
 prophets. The prophet would have been a person who habitually 
 possessed the prophetic inspiration. 3 There was an abundance of the 
 prophetic gift in the Corinthian Church ( i Cor. xiv. 29-36), but if the 
 prophets appear here as members simply of the local community, 
 speaking generally they belong to the general, as opposed to the local, 
 
 1 See especially Bonwetsch Montanismus p. 139 : ' Allem dem entgegenzutreten, 
 wodurch die kirchlichen Verhaltnisse eine dauerndere Gestalt zum Zweck des 
 Eingehens in eine langere geschichtliche Entwicklung erhalten sollten.' This was 
 modified in later Montanism. 
 
 a But see St. Matt. vii. 22, x. 41 : elsewhere He speaks of false prophets (vii. 15, 
 xxiv. n) or Old Testament prophets (St. Luke xi. 49-51) or couples prophets with 
 ' wise men and scribes ' so that the language becomes analogical (St. Matt. xxiiL 
 34, cf. x. 41). 
 
 * So Meyer i Cor. xiv. 31, and Bonwetsch Die Prophttie in apost. u. nachapost. 
 Zeitalter in Zeitschr. f. kircffl. Wissenschaft u. k. Leben, 1884, Heft viii, p. 413, 
 and ix, on whom this note is largely based. It should also be noticed that the 
 existence of these distinctive prophets is not inconsistent with the gift of prophecy 
 being given to the whole Church, see Acts ii. 17, 18.
 
 360 Christian Ministry. 
 
 ministry and rank with apostles and evangelists and teachers (see esp. 
 Eph. iv. II, iii. 5, ii. 20, and Acts xiii. I, where Barnabas and Saul 
 rank amongst prophets and teachers). 
 
 We get a clear idea of the characteristics of Christian prophecy. 
 
 1. In marked contrast to the idea of a prophet in Plato and in Philo, 1 
 St. Paul insists that the Christian prophet is no unconscious, passive 
 instrument of the Spirit. Prophecy is rational and subject to the will 
 of the prophet in a remarkable manner, see I Cor. xiv. and especially 
 verse 32 : ' the spirits of the prophets (cf. Apoc. xxii. 6) are subject to 
 the prophets,' also Rom. xii. 6, and Acts xxi. 4, n, where St. Paul 
 seems to regard prophetic utterances as misdirected in intention though 
 true in fact. St. Paul indeed on one occasion was the subject of 
 something like an ecstasy. But it afforded no material for his public 
 ministry ; it was a blessing only for his own spirit, and is not mentioned 
 for fourteen years (2 Cor. xii. 2-4). St. John's Apocalypse is a special 
 form of prophecy of most direct inspiration (cf. Apoc. i. 3, 10, iv. 2, 
 xxii. 7, 10, 1 8, 19), but St. John clearly retains his consciousness and 
 personality throughout the revelations made to him, and the function 
 of prophecy is generally defined as ' the testimony of Jesus ' (xix. 10) 
 and regarded as continuing into the new covenant (xi. 18, xviii. 20). 
 
 2. The Christian prophet is no individual oracle. He is one of a 
 body, and his gift exists for the good of the whole body. Accordingly 
 it is subordinated to the regulative authority in the body, in the interest 
 of order: see I Cor. xii. and xiv. 4, 5, 12, 17, 29-33, 40. Our Lord 
 had directed that prophets were to be known by their moral fruits 
 (St. Matt. vii. 15, 16). St. John also directs that utterances claiming 
 inspiration should be tested by the rule of faith (i John iv. 1-3, 2 John 
 7- 1 1, cf. i Thess. v. 19-21). 
 
 3. We should gather from the Acts that Christian prophets foretold, 
 like Agabus ; see Acts xi. 28, xxi. n. So St. Peter exercises prophetic 
 power (Acts v. 3-10) and the Spirit guides the Apostles on critical 
 occasions by specially communicated directions or prohibitions (Acts 
 x. 19, xiii. 2, xvi. 6, xx. 22, 23, xxiii. n, xxvii. 23). St. Paul (i Tim. 
 i. 1 8, iv. 14) says that Timothy was pointed out for his office by 
 prophecies, and that prophecy was the means by which he came to 
 receive his ' gift. ' It is also the prophetic function to exhort and 
 confirm and edify (Acts xv. 32 vapeK6.\ecra.v, lireffr^pi^av, cf. I Cor. 
 xiv. 3 olKo5o/j.-f], 7ro/)d/cX?/(rts, irapa/j.v6ia). Further in Acts xiii. 1-3, 
 prophets (and teachers) appear as ministers of the Church's worship, 
 
 1 See Bonwetsch I.e. p. 415. He gives excellent references showing how essential 
 to the idea of prophecy in these writers is its ecstatic character : ovfiei? evvov<s 
 ifya.Trrfra.1 fiavnifijs tvOiov (Plat. Tint. 723), efoneT<u iv ypuv o vovs Kara. TTJV roO 
 Oeiov jjreu/uaTOS actti/ (Philo Quis Rerutn Divin. Haer. i. 511). It was because 
 Montanist prophecy was of this irrational, ecstatic character that the Church 
 rejected it.
 
 Note I. 361 
 
 and they are represented as laying their hands after fasting and prayer 
 upon Saul and Barnabas. On this occasion, however, the laying-on of 
 hands recognised, rather than gave, apostolic commission, l and a super- 
 natural intimation led up to it ; so that it was an exceptional event. 
 But it is probable that those who could enact the rite on this occasion 
 could have done so under more ordinary circumstances, for ' ordination ' 
 or 'confirmation.' Who but Barnabas one of these prophets (xiii. i) 
 can have laid hands on the Antiochene Christians for the bestowal of 
 the Spirit? See Acts xi. 22 and cf. viii. 14. It falls in with the 
 * liturgical ' function of prophets, that St. Paul implies that there were 
 such things as inspired prayers as well as inspired exhortations. There 
 is a praying and praising which is by both the spirit and the reason, a 
 ' eucharist ' to which the private Christian can say his Amen with an 
 intelligent assent, and which is none the less ' in the Spirit ' ( I Cor. 
 xiv. 15, 16). 
 
 The gift of prophecy continued as a recognised endowment of the 
 Church into the second or third centuries. Certain people were recog- 
 nised as prophets, e.g. Ignatius, Polycarp, and Quadratus, already 
 referred to (cf. Euseb. H. E. v. i. 49 on Alexander the Phrygian). 
 As in the apostolic Church there had been prophetesses, so too they 
 had their late representative in Ammia at Philadelphia (Euseb. H. E. 
 v. 17). St. Irenaeus, besides denouncing false prophets (adv. Haer. 
 iv. 33. 6), protests against those who would banish prophecy from 
 the Church under pretence of exposing such pretenders (iii. II. 9: 
 ' propheticam . . . gratiam repellunt ab ecclesia ') and witnesses like 
 Justin Martyr to the continuance of prophetic gifts in his day (ii. 32, 4, 
 v. 6. i ; Justin c. Tryph. 82). Even an opponent of the false prophets 
 of Montanism recognises that prophecy must continue in the whole 
 Church to the end (ap. Euseb. H. E. v. 17). The Montanist prophets 
 were rejected by the Church specially on account of the ecstatic and 
 irrational character of their supposed gifts. Their rejection involved 
 no slight at all on the gift of prophecy and no denial of its claims. As 
 a matter of fact, however, the genuine gift seems to have become 
 exceedingly rare ; Origen speaks of slight traces of it remaining to his 
 time (c. Cels. i. 46, vii. 8). 
 
 The documents of the subapostolic age are of special interest for this 
 subject the Didache and the Shepherd of Hermas. In the Didacke, 
 the true prophet is distinguished from the false 'by his fruits,' i.e. by 
 his genuine poverty and disinterestedness and by his orthodoxy. So 
 far he is subject to the testing of the Church. But when once his true 
 prophetic inspiration is accepted, it becomes a sin against the Holy 
 
 1 In the general sense ; it is to be regarded, however, as giving them the com- 
 mission of the Church at Antioch for a particular work indicated supernaturally 
 by the Spirit ' the work whereunto He had called them.'
 
 362 Christian Ministry. 
 
 Ghost to judge him ; see xi. i, 2, 7-13. The remarkable features in 
 the prophets of this document is that, like those at Antioch in the Acts, 
 they become, wherever they appear, the chief ministers of worship, no 
 less than of teaching, and hold, with the less defined figures of apostle 
 and teacher, the first rank in the church hierarchy. The Didache is, 
 as was said, the last document in which prophets appear clothed with 
 this higher dignity. Prophetic bishops take the place of episcopal 
 prophets. There is not, however, as has been pointed out elsewhere 
 (p. 259), sufficient reason to hold that the latter ever held their quasi- 
 apostolic position in the Church on the mere ground of their prophetic 
 gifts, without ordination. 
 
 In the Shepherd, Hermas appears as the recipient of veritable visions 
 which are to be communicated to the Church. If thus he is to, be 
 considered as a true prophet, 1 he gives us also a vivid picture of the 
 false prophet inspired of Satan (Mand. xi). His characteristic is self- 
 seeking and ambition. He is represented sitting on a 'cathedra,' 
 answering the questions of those who come to consult him. No spirit 
 given from God, says Hermas, is thus questioned, but speaks of itself 
 according to the divine power given. The spirit which is questioned 
 and answers according to the lusts of men is earthly and devilish. 
 Again, in order to secure reputation, the false prophet isolates himself 
 and prophesies in a corner, whereas the true prophet only speaks 
 (where the pretender is dumb) in the congregation of just men. 
 Again, the false prophet is ambitious of ecclesiastical preferment, he 
 desires the ' chief seat,' while the true prophet is humble and meek. 
 Again, the false prophet requires to be paid before he will speak. 
 Thus the true and false prophets are to be distinguished by their 
 conduct. 
 
 It is clear that at the time of the Shepherd the prophet did not hold 
 anything like the position which he held in the Didache, No doubt 
 the abundance of pretenders to inspiration made it plain that prophecy, 
 even if an abiding endowment of the Church, was a rare one and not 
 intended for the Church to depend upon for a supply of her chief 
 ministers, In the Apostolical Constitzitions we have a clear intimation 
 of the transitory character of the miraculous ' charismata ' of the early 
 Church, and of prophecy among them. The Apostles are there repre- 
 sented as declaring that in contrast to the fundamental spiritual gift 
 which is the essence of Christian life miracles were only vouchsafed in 
 view of the conversion of the world and would become superfluous when 
 all were Christians : accordingly those who possess the exceptional gifts 
 are warned not to exalt themselves on that account over the church 
 rulers, and the exorcist, in spite of the gift of healings which marks 
 him for his special office without any ordination, is yet required to be 
 1 See Salmon's Introd. p. 577 f.
 
 Note K. 363 
 
 ordained in the usual way, ' if there be need that he should become a 
 presbyter or bishop.' See Apost. Const, viii. i and 26. 
 
 The earlier functions of the prophet passed in a certain sense, as has 
 been pointed out (p. 260), to bishops and readers. Ambrose, we may 
 further note, regards interpreters of the Scriptures as their repre- 
 sentatives in his day. 
 
 K. 
 
 THE ORIGIN OF THE TITLES 
 
 'BISHOP,' 'PRESBYTER,' 'DEACON,' 
 
 WITH REFERENCE TO RECENT CRITICISM. 
 
 I. The purpose of this note is, first, to offer evidence for what has 
 already been advanced on this subject in the text (pp. 220, 231, 240). 
 
 (a) The title PRESBYTER is derived confessedly from the organization 
 of the Jews,' but in order to show that the Christian organization was 
 not imitated from the Jewish as a whole, it is necessary to give some 
 account of what the Jewish organization was, as far as we know it, 
 both in Jerusalem and in ' the dispersion.' 3 
 
 It was fourfold, (i) There was the priestly organization for the 
 purpose of the temple worship, with high-priests, priests, and Levites. 
 This, however, did not of course exist anywhere except at Jerusalem. 
 
 (2) Representing the traditional religious learning amongst the Jews, 
 we find, both in Jerusalem and in the dispersion, the recognised order 
 of the scribes, who may be said to have taken the place of the prophets. 
 Their name occurs commonly in the Jewish inscriptions found at 
 Rome. 
 
 (3) For the purposes of the synagogue worship, both in Jerusalem 
 and throughout the Jewish world, there was a apxurw&yufos, with 
 his inniptTris or clerk, or several apxiavvdywyoi (see Acts xiii. 15 ; cf. 
 St. Mark v. 22, where however the reference may be to the rulers of 
 different synagogues ; for the turijpt'r^s see St. Luke iv. 20). The 
 ' ruler of the synagogue ' selected and regulated the readers or preachers. 
 
 (4) For judicial and disciplinary purposes there was a 
 
 1 See Cornelius a Lapide in Eph. iv. n. 
 
 2 However, as the reverence for age is universal, so we have not only the 
 ancient Greek ytpovyia, but a later use of irpr/3vr<pot for members of a ytpovtria., 
 at least in Asia Minor. See Hatch B. L. pp. 65, 66. 
 
 3 The following account is largely derived from Schurer Die Genteindeverfassung 
 der Juden in Rom in der Kaiserzeit, Leipzig, 1879. His results have been verified 
 by Kuhl in Die Geineindtordnung in den Pastoralbriefen, Berlin, 1885, p. 117.
 
 364 Christian Ministry. 
 
 or body of irpea-fiisrepoi, of whom we hear often in the New Testament 
 (e.g. St. Luke xxii. 66, Acts xxii. 5) as constituting the sanhedrin. 
 Apparently, however, this name was not much used except at Jerusalem : 
 Schiirer does not find the name in his Roman inscriptions. 1 In the 
 Jewish communities at Rome 2 we have Apxovres, or ' rulers ' (in St. 
 Matt. ix. 18 however 3.pxw = dpxurwdyuyos, St. Luke viii. 41, St. 
 Mark v. 22 ; and see Acts iv. 5, 8), presided over by a yepovffiapxw, 
 who was primus inter pares. These presidents are called TrptoTetiovres 
 rrjs yepov<rlas by Josephus Bell. lud. vii. IO. I ( = maiores o* primates). 
 The apxovres seem to have been elected annually 3 ; cf. pseudo- 
 Chrysostom Opp. [ed. Paris, 1588] ii. p. 1086. These four organizations 
 were essentially distinct, though it might happen that the presbytery at 
 Jerusalem might consist of ' high-priests and scribes, ' as in St. Luke 
 xxii. 66 (but on the other hand see Acts xxii. 5), or that an &PXW at 
 Rome might also be an dpxiffvvdyuyos (as in Schiirer's inscriptions 19, 
 42), or a priest an &px^" (inscr. 5). Besides these officers we hear 
 also of the title of ' father ' or ' mother of the synagogue ' being given 
 to persons of age or influence. 
 
 This sketch of the Jewish fourfold organization will suffice to show 
 within what limits the Christian Church can be described as having 
 borrowed from it. The important points to notice are two. 
 
 First, that the Christian Church borrowed none of the Jewish titles 
 except that of 'presbyter.' Epiphanius indeed mentions (Haer. xxx. 
 1 8) that the Ebionites used the title dpxurvvdyuyos, but this is an 
 instance of reversion, for there is no evidence for the use of the title in 
 the Christian Church. Lucian again, the pagan, speaks of Peregrinus 
 as irpo<j>riTr)s KO! 6ia<rdpxfis Kal vva.yuye)js of the Christians, but this 
 last title, no more than the second, was recognised in the Church. 
 The Christian place of meeting is called a irvvayuyil by St. James 
 
 1 These Roman inscriptions belong apparently to the third or fourth century A.D. 
 The word rrpe<r/ivTepos occurs once among the Hebrew inscriptions found at Venosa, 
 in South Italy, perhaps of the sixth century and later : see a paper of Ascoli in the 
 Atti del IV Congresso dei Orientalisti, Florence. 1880, vol. i. pp. 239 f. ; esp. p. 281 
 note 2, 292 and 350. Kuhl, I.e. p. 117, discounts this on account of its date. Also 
 the more frequent occurrence of the female form jrpecr/SvTe'pr) (sic) indicates that it has 
 no longer its official meaning. Ascoli says, ' piuttosto dev' esser titolo d'onoranza, 
 che non di vera dignita, poiche gli sta accanto la irpecrfivTepa.' There is, however, 
 one instance of the use of the term out of Jerusalem in an inscription at Smyrna ; 
 see C.f.G. 9897. 
 
 2 At Alexandria, it should be noticed, the Jews formed one community under one 
 Gerusia. At Rome, on the contrary, they constituted a number of separate com- 
 munities (or 'colleges' in the eye of the State); each had its own synagogue and 
 officers. The Christians in Rome, before they were organized into a Church, seem 
 to have formed a number of separate congregations (see Rom. xvi. 5, 14, 15). 
 
 3 It is said that they often held office for life, and that on this account an archon 
 came to be known as Sia/Jtos (diabius), but Ascoli denies this latter assertion, and 
 regards the word as an exclamation or condensed prayer, see I.e. p. 344.
 
 Note K. 365 
 
 (ii. 2). This, however, is the only case in which it is used in the 
 Christian Church in the specific Jewish sense : see, for its use in the 
 more general sense of a gathering, Ignatius ad Polyc. 4 and Lightfoot's 
 note, Hermas Mand. xi. 9, Heb. x. 25. Epiphanius also (I.e.) 
 mentions that the Ebionites used the term, and the author of the 
 Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs endeavours to give his work a 
 Jewish colouring by speaking of Christian Churches as ' synagogues 
 of the Gentiles,' and their ministers as 'archons' (Benf. n). The 
 Christian ' council ' is also called a avvtfyiov in Ignat. ad Philad. 8, 
 ad Magn. 6, ad Trail, 3, but, as is noted below, in the way of 
 metaphor. 
 
 Secondly, that the Christian Church had only one gradually developed 
 organization. It is true that this organization embodied various prin- 
 ciples the principle of authority and rule, the veneration due to age, 
 the power derived from inspiration or spiritual gifts, and the devolution 
 of special tasks on special executive officers, owing to the natural 
 exigencies of organization. 1 It is true also that amongst the Jews the 
 same person might be at once a scribe, a ruler of the synagogue, and 
 a presbyter that is, the distinct organizations might be represented by 
 the same person. Still it remains the case that all our evidence goes 
 to show that the Christian Church had only one organization, while the 
 Jews, with their temple, schools, synagogue, and sanhedrin, had four. 
 All the functions and powers of Ministry were, in fact, summed up 
 at first in the Apostles with whom however must be reckoned other 
 ' prophets ' in whom the Church recognised a supernatural inspiration 
 and were gradually imparted under their authority and leading to 
 different officers, who shared she same ministry in distinct grades. 
 Thus, if the function of worship, which in the Christian Church formed 
 the spiritual counterpart of the temple \firovpyta, was (as Harnack 
 says 2 ) ' the primary function ' of the episcopate if it was the bishop's 
 office to ' offer the gifts ' (Clem, ad Cor. 44), yet they are said to 
 share the \eirovpyia of the prophets and teachers in this respect (Did. 
 xv. i), and these prophets and teachers are in the Acts specially brought 
 before us as fulfilling this function of worship (Acts xiii. 2). Then, 
 again, with reference to this function of teaching. This ' ministry of 
 the word ' or ' stewardship of the mysteries of God ' belongs primarily 
 to apostles and prophets with teachers or evangelists, but it is shared 
 also by the ' bishops ' (i Tim. iii. 2, v. 17, Tit. i. 9 ; the local ' pastors ' 
 are called ' teachers' in Eph. iv. n). Once again, if the presbyterate 
 as derived from Judaism held the judicial and ' pastoral ' function 
 
 1 See Hamack Te.rte tt. Untersvck. B. ii, H. 2, p. 146 f. He calls these principles 
 the aristocratic, the patriarchal, \he spiritual, and the administrative. 
 
 2 Dogmengesch. i. p. 155 ; cf. Expositor, May 1887, pp. 340-342. He includes the 
 deacon also. The matter is discussed below.
 
 366 Christian Ministry. 
 
 (Acts xx. 29-30 ; I Pet. v. 2), yet in the Christian Church the Apostles 
 are the chief ministers of discipline (cf . I Cor. v. ; Acts xv. 2), and the 
 presbyters, as will be shown, were also bishops, and, as such, teachers 
 and leaders of worship ; they share, in fact, the whole apostolic pastorate 
 (i Pet. v. I, 2), and in St. James's Epistle they perform a function 
 which involves a spiritual ministration (James v. 14) ; later, when they 
 are distinct from the bishop, they sometimes indeed appear as the 
 special ministers of discipline, as in the Ebionite Clementines (Ep. 
 Clem. 7-10 ; Horn. iii. 67, 68), but even so under the bishop Ep. Clem. 
 2, 3, 6 ; Ep. Petr. 4), and not to the exclusion of the deacons {Ep. Clem. 
 12 ; Apost. Const, ii. 44, 57 vu i- 2 8). Finally, if the administration 
 of alms was in some special sense a function of the diaconate in its 
 original idea, yet it does not cease to be part of the apostolic office to 
 organize almsgiving (see Gal. ii. 10, 2 Cor. viii., etc.), nor should it 
 surprise us to find it specially mentioned in connection with the pres- 
 byterate (Acts xi. 30; Polycarp ad Phil. 6, n ; cf. Eg. Ch. Ord. c. 
 18), though when the presbyterate came to be the name for a distinct 
 office from the episcopate, the function of the administration of alms 
 came to belong generally to the bishop, with the assistance of the 
 deacon (Canons of Hippolytus c. v.). 
 
 (6) The title EPISCOPUS was common among the Greeks. In Attic 
 it is used for a commissioner 'appointed to regulate a new colony or 
 acquisition' whom the Spartans would have called a 'harmost.' 
 Among writers of the period of the empire, it is used by Arrian for 
 the inspectors employed by Indian kings ; by Appian for a commis- 
 sioner appointed by Mithridates in Ephesus * ; by Dionysius of Hali- 
 carnassus for the inspectors of agriculture whom Numa Pompilius is 
 supposed to have instituted. 2 It is used also in inscriptions of the 
 Hauran (a district of the ancient Bashan) for civic officers who seem 
 to represent the 'agoranomi,' ' qui praesunt pani et ceteris venalibus 
 rebus quae civitatum populis ad quotidianum victum usui sunt ' (so 
 Charisius, a jurisconsult of Constantine's time, explains their office, 
 Digest. 1. 4 18) ; and also for 'committees' appointed to superintend 
 any work, see Le Bas et Waddington Inscriptions Grecques et Latines, 
 1990, 2330, 2308. This last commemorates the restoration of a con- 
 duit and temple in Commodus' time at Soueida tTriffKowotiffris <J>V\T)S 
 2onai6t}vwt>. It seems also to be used for the officer of a guild, though 
 his functions are not clear. 3 MM. Le Bas and Waddington remark 
 
 1 For refs. see Lightfoot Philippians p. 95. 
 
 * Dion. Hal. Ant. Rom. ii. 76 : fitetAe ri\v \iapav aira<rav el? TOIIS (caXov/neVovs 
 iro'yovs (cai Kare'cmjcrei' i<t>' exacrrou riav iroywi/ apxovra. cirtoxoirdi' re eai irfpCirokov 
 TTJS ii'as ftotpa? . 
 
 8 Hatch B. L. pp. 37, 38, note. The matter is not of great importance. Dr. 
 Lightfoot calls the evidence ' slight ' (Dissert, p. 194). So also Kiihl pp. 93-96. 
 Sanday, Expositor, Feb. 1887, pp. 98-100: 'I confess that I cannot quite satisfy
 
 Note K. 367 
 
 (torn. iii. p. 474) : ' il est interessant de rencontrer si pres du berceau du 
 christianisme le mot ewiffKowos applique a un fonctionnaire civil. 
 C'est la, peut-etre, que les apotres 1'ont pris pour le donner aux premiers 
 surveillants et directeurs des communautes chre"tiennes. ' 
 
 So far then we have seen cause at least to recognise that there was a 
 wide use of the term eTrtV/coTros in Greek of the imperial period, and 
 especially in Syria, for an administrative officer, which must clearly 
 have suggested or facilitated the Christian use of the term. On the 
 other hand the word had a use in the Old Testament (LXX). ' In the 
 LXX,' says Dr. Lightfoot, 1 'the word is common. In some places it 
 signifies "inspectors, superintendents, taskmasters," as 2 Kings xi. 19, 
 2 Chron. xxxiv. 12, 17, Is. Ix. 17 ; in others it is a higher title, " cap- 
 tains" or "presidents," Neh. xi. 9, 14, 22. Of Antiochus Epiphanes 
 we are told that when he determined to overthrow the worship of the 
 one true God, he "appointed commissioners (n07c6irous, bishops) over 
 all the people," to see that his orders were obeyed (i Mace. i. 51, 
 comp. Joseph. Ant. xii. 5. 4 : in 2 Mace. v. 22 the word is ^iriaTdras). 
 The feminine iirurKOir^, which is not a classical word, occurs very 
 frequently in the LXX, denoting sometimes the work, sometimes the 
 office, of an ^TTiV/coiros. Hence it passed into the language of the New 
 Testament and of the Christian Church.' Dr. Sanday quotes this 
 passage, 2 and adds : ' If tirurKoinfi had its origin in the usage of the 
 LXX, is it not reasonable to derive tirlfficoiros from the same source ? ' 
 He argues in favour of this position with great force, and calls atten- 
 tion to the fact that Clement of Rome refers back the institution of 
 Christian bishops to the authority of Isaiah. 3 It should be added that 
 St. Peter speaks of Judas' apostolate with reference to Ps. cix. 8, as an 
 etriffKOTr-f] (Acts i. 20). On the whole, if contemporary secular usage 
 had a good deal to do with the use of the term ' episcopus ' in the 
 Christian Church, it is probable that Old Testament usage had at least 
 as much influence. Obviously the two influences are very likely to 
 have combined. The name has no more definite meaning than that of 
 'superintendence.' On being adopted by the Apostles, it would have 
 gained from the first a new colour from the spiritual character of the 
 supervision which the Christian communities required 4 : the Christian 
 
 myself as to the evidence which has been adduced to show that this was a standing 
 title for the financial officer of the clubs or guilds.' Salmon, Expositor, July 1887, 
 p. 19 : 'The proof offered is extremely meagre.' 
 
 1 Philippians pp. 95, 96. 
 
 2 Expositor, Feb. 1887, p. 102. 
 
 3 Is. Ix. 17, quoted by Clem, ad Cor. 42 as Karaon/tru TOVS tiritricoirovs avruv iv 
 SiKoLiotrvvr) KO.L TOVS SIOUCOPOUS avruv ev iri<rret. It is quoted also by Irenaeus with 
 a similar purpose, but from the LXX, without alteration. 
 
 4 Dr. Sanday inclines to think the superintendence was of persons, and specially 
 of deacons : the bishop, that is, was the superintendent of deacons, cf. Expositor,
 
 368 Christian Ministry. 
 
 presbyters were charged by St. Paul to 'take heed unto themselves, 
 and to all the flock, in the which the Holy Ghost had made them 
 bishops, to feed [rule] the Church of God, which He purchased with 
 His own blood.' 
 
 (c) The title DEACON (Phil. i. i)does not seem to have been derived 
 from any Jewish or pagan source, but to have been a natural applica- 
 tion of the more general idea of ministry to the wants of others, so 
 specially characteristic of Christianity ; see St. Luke xxii. 26, 27. 
 
 (d) The titles ' presbyter ' and ' episcopus ' were used interchange- 
 ably for the same officers; see esp. Acts. xx. 17, 28, Titus i. 5, 7. 1 
 At the same time it is natural to suppose that the title ' presbyter ' 
 would have seemed more natural in Jewish communities, and the 
 title ' episcopus ' among Gentile Christians. Thus in fact St. James, 
 and probably St. Peter (see I Pet. v. 2 R.v. marg. ), uses only the 
 former title. But the distinction cannot be pressed. The Jewish 
 Didache knows only the title tiriffKoiros (xv. i). On the other hand 
 the officers at Ephesus are known as presbyters as well as ' episcopi ' 
 (Acts xx. 17; I Tim. v. 17, 19; cf. Acts xiv. 23). It is natural also 
 to suppose that the term tirlffKoiros was more definitely the title of an 
 office, while irpefffivTepos, with its vaguer application to the dignity of 
 age (cf. I Pet. v. 1-5 ; Clem, ad Cor. i. 3 ; Polycarp ad Phil. 5, 6 ; in 
 all these cases in contrast to youth 2 ) represented rather a position of 
 respect (see above p. 136). Thus Theodore of Mopsuestia, while he 
 acknowledges that ' presbyter ' and ' episcopus ' are used interchange- 
 ably, yet justifies the use of the 'presbytery' in i Tim. iv. 14 (as he 
 thinks) for 6 ruv diroffTO\wi> cru\\oyos with these words : Trpeaftirrtpiov 
 ainb 6voy.6.ffas dirb roO Ivrlfj-ov. This, he explains, was rather a title 
 of respect as amongst the Jews, while presbyters were called bishops 
 &,<p' oSirep /uerflWai' Kal Zpyov, T< /udXiora iraffLV tiriffKOirelv (in I Tim. 
 iii. 3, Swete ii. p. 120). But this distinction again admits of being 
 pressed very little way. All the evidence goes to show that the pres- 
 byterate was a definite office to which the Apostles appointed men 
 (Acts xiv. 23) and that the presbyter was also called a bishop. 
 
 () The presbyter-episcopi exercised a pastorate of souls (i Peter 
 v. 2, Acts xx. 28). They shared with the Apostles the stewardship of 
 God (Titus i. 7). They took their share in teaching and admonishing 
 (i Thess. v. 12, etc. ; though there may perhaps have been some who 
 did not teach, I Tim. v. 17). They administered sacraments and 
 sacramental rites (Clem, ad Cor. 44, Didache xv. I, James v. 14). 
 
 Feb. 1887, p. 100. But see Acts xx. 28. He also suggests (with Kiihl), that, as the 
 verb &ia.Kov(iv preceded the title SIO.KOVOI, so the verb finirKOTrfiv may have preceded 
 the title ernVjcon-ot. But there is no evidence of this. 
 
 1 See Dr. Ligbtfoot's note, Philippians p. 95 f. 
 
 2 But the presbyters in all these cases are also definite officers ; cf. the term icArjpoi 
 ( = ' allotted charges') in i Pet. v. 3.
 
 Note K. 369 
 
 They also administered discipline and, in part at least, charity. In 
 fact they were, under the Apostles and apostolic men, the spiritual 
 ' presidents ' of the Churches. 
 
 II. In view of this positive position we have now to examine the 
 recent speculations 1 especially connected with the names of Dr. 
 Hatch and Professor Harnack. 
 
 (a) Dr. Hatch lays stress upon the fact noticed above that the 
 Jewish communities possessed distinct organizations from different 
 points of view, the presbyterate constituting the organization for the 
 purpose of discipline. He supposes the Christian Church to have 
 derived from Judaism not only the title of the presbyterate, but also its 
 functions, unchanged. ' It may be gathered,' he says (B. L. pp. 57-62), 
 'from the Talmud that out of the elders or chief men of every com- 
 munity a certain number had come to be officially recognised, and that 
 definite rules were laid down for their action. Side by side with the 
 synagogue of a town, but distinct from it, was the vuvtSpiov or local 
 court. The former was the general assembly, or " congregation " of 
 the people: the latter was the "seat" of the elders.' So in the 
 Christian Church ' there is a strong presumption that the officers who 
 continued to bear the same names in the same community exercised 
 functions closely analogous to those which they had exercised before ; 
 in other words, that the elders of the Jewish communities which had 
 become Christian were, like the elders of the Jewish communities 
 which remained Jewish, officers of administration and of discipline." 
 This derivation of functions from Judaism to Christianity was facili- 
 tated in Dr. Hatch's view, as this quotation will have shown, by the 
 very gradual transition which he supposes to have taken place from 
 the older Jewish to the Christian religion. ' When the majority of the 
 members of a Jewish community were convinced that Jesus was the 
 Christ, there was nothing to interrupt the current of their former 
 common life. There was no need for secession, for schism, for a 
 change in the organization. The old form of worship and the old 
 modes of government could still go on. The weekly commemoration 
 of the Resurrection supplemented, but did not supersede, the ancient 
 sabbath. The reading of the life of Christ and of the letters of the 
 Apostles supplemented, but did not supersede, the ancient lessons from 
 the prophets, and the ancient singing of the psalms. The community 
 as a whole was known by the same name which had designated the 
 purely Jewish community. It was still a irapoiida. a colony living as 
 
 1 The earlier speculations to which Baur gave the chief impulse have been 
 noticed above, p. 229 note 1. They were connected primarily with the question of 
 the authenticity of the Acts anti the Pastoral Epistles, and the general theory of 
 the Tubingen school which is bound up with this question. They treated the 
 development of the ministry' only secondarily. 
 
 2 A
 
 3/O Christian Ministry. 
 
 strangers and pilgrims in the midst of an alien society. . . . The same 
 names were in use for the court of administration and for the mem- 
 bers of that court : and even the weekly court-days remained the 
 same.' 1 Thus the Jewish Christian communities derived from the 
 Jewish a presbyterate of men of age and gravity, for purposes of 
 'administration and discipline.' The origin of the episcopate was 
 different. ' The officers of administration and finance [in the contem- 
 porary non- Christian associations] were chiefly known by one or 
 other of two names' tiri/j.\rrrfy or tirlfficoiros. 2 This latter title then 
 was borrowed to express the administrative officer of the Christian 
 communities, and, as the primary administration is supposed by Dr. 
 Hatch to have been financial, so the primary function of the primitive 
 'bishop' was financial administration. 3 On this point Dr. Hatch's 
 theory was modified by Prof. Harnack in his Analecten to his German 
 translation of Dr. Hatch's work, and Dr. Hatch himself now explains 
 that he 'is wrongly supposed to lay any exclusive or even especial 
 stress upon the financial character of the tirifficoiroi. ' 4 The presby- 
 terate was, then, a disciplinary board derived from Judaism, the 
 episcopus was an administrative officer, derived from the contemporary 
 guilds. 
 
 This theory of Dr. Hatch was developed by Prof. Harnack, and 
 while the former in his Bampton Lectures had taken up no decisive 
 position about the genuineness of the Pastoral Epistles and Acts, the 
 latter boldly declares all these documents to belong to the second 
 century (with the Epistle of St. James), and in developing his theory 
 is at pains to explain that it is intimately bound up with the critical 
 
 1 The general idea of this paragraph will be criticised further on. Here a few 
 details need notice, (i) There is no evidence quoted of a Jewish community of 
 ' the dispersion ' calling itself a jrapot/ci'a. The Jewish instance of the word quoted 
 p. 61 n.l* is from the LXX and refers to the captivity. All the other instances given 
 are Christian. 
 
 (2) The Christian presbyterate is compared to the (rvveSptov TO>I/ ano<n6\iav in 
 ad Magn. 6 ; so in ad Trail. 3, ws ovviSpiov 0eov icai !>s <rvvSe<rnov an-oordAwi' ; 
 in ad Philad. 8 it is called the ' synedrion of the bishop.' But in none of the cases 
 is the presbyterate called the sanhedrin in the Jewish sense, officially, still less so by 
 the 'Fathers of the fifth and sixth centuries.' 
 
 (3) There is no reference given for the weekly court-days remaining the same. 
 
 2 B. L. p. 36 f. 
 
 3 B. L. p. 39 : ' in their special capacity as administrators of church funds they 
 were known by a name which was in current use for such administrators.' 
 
 * See Dr. Hatch's explanation in Expositor, Feb. 1887, p. 99, note *, and his com- 
 munication to Dr. Harnack's Dogmengcsch. i. p. 155, note 1 . This latter may 
 indicate that he would not (since the discovery of the Didache) differ from Harnack 
 that the ' episcopi and diaconi were primarily officers of worship ' ; cf. Expositor, 
 May 1887, pp. 339-342 ; Texte u.s.w. I.e., p. 144. This explanation of Dr. Hatch's 
 renders unnecessary a good deal of criticism (as by Ki'ihl and others). It also 
 makes it difficult to see the point of his arguments and references on pp. 47, 48.
 
 Note K. 371 
 
 position. Having thus given himself free scope for writing on the 
 origines of the ministry by having abolished so much of the evidence, 
 he supposes that the office of the episcopus was originally quite distinct 
 from that of the presbyter, and that there was a partial fusion, followed 
 again by a fresh separation in the monarchical episcopate of later 
 days. 1 
 
 (b) Dr. Hatch, regarding the functions of presbyters as judicial or 
 disciplinary and those of the episcopus as administrative in an almost 
 secular sense, treats the local officers of the Christian Churches as 
 originally hardly ' spiritual ' persons : ' the ministration of the word 
 and sacraments' was a later conception of the presbyterate. a He also 
 supposes that their office was only temporary. Here again, however, 
 Prof. Harnack modifies the idea, maintaining that the episcopate and 
 diaconate, as distinct from the presbyterate, ranked as charismatic, 
 and were therefore 'almost free from control.' 3 
 
 It will be seen at once that this position as carried out by Prof. 
 Harnack rests upon the repudiation of the Acts and the Pastoral 
 Epistles as representing authentic history and the mind of St. Paul. 
 Enough has been said earlier in this note on the identification of the 
 presbyters and the bishops, and on the ' spiritual ' functions of the 
 presbyter-bishops. It should however be pointed out further with 
 reference to other parts of Dr. Hatch's theory, that : 
 
 i. The title 'presbyter' was chiefly, if not exclusively, in use 
 amongst the Jews of Jerusalem, and its use in the Churches would 
 therefore indicate not the gradual organization of Christian communities 
 side by side with the Jewish, and on their model, all over the empire 
 
 1 See Harnack, in Expositor, I.e. His theory is explained by Dr. Sanday, 
 Expositor, Jan. 1887. Dr. Hatch on the other hand says that ' the weight of 
 evidence has rendered practically indisputable' the identity of presbyters and 
 episcopi in the N. T. (B. L. p. 39). Dr. Sanday calls this 'something that looks 
 a little like a concession to the older view ' (I.e. p. 12). It seems to me inconsist- 
 ent with the episcopi and presbyters representing different organizations. With 
 reference to this view as carried out by Harnack with 'more uncompromising 
 logic,' it would appear that the evidence of such passages as Acts xx. 28, Titus i. 
 5, 7 (whenever written), and of Clem, ad Car. 44, was enough to overthrow it. 
 No passage can be produced in which there are signs of a distinction being 
 drawn between presbyters and episcopi, existing together, till the later distinction 
 of the monarchical episcopate. Nor, in view of Polycarp ad Phil. 5 -ora<r<rojtf VO\K 
 TO irpecr/Surepois icai. SUKOKOIS, can the connection of the title diaconus with that 
 of episcopus be pressed as if the deacons were in no relation to the presbyters. It 
 is probably an accident that we do not hear more of presbyters and deacons in 
 conjunction. Later no doubt the deacon was attached specially to the monarchical 
 bishop, but still the clergy are often described as presbyters and deacons, as e.g. by 
 Clem. Alex, in Strom, vi. 13. 
 
 2 B. L. pp. 72-82. 
 
 Analecten z* Hatch p. 234, note 1 ; but in Expositor, May 1887, p. 333, 
 he speaks of Clement as first maintaining the lifelong character of the episcopate.
 
 372 Christian Ministry. 
 
 in which case we should have had Christian archons but the 
 derivation of the Christian communities from Jerusalem as a centre. 
 
 z. Though the Christianity represented on one level by St. James 
 and on a much lower level by the Didache may be described as a 
 gradual transition from the old to the new covenant, this was not an 
 ordinary position. Not only the Epistle to the Thessalonians and the 
 Acts of the Apostles, but that most Jewish of New Testament docu- 
 ments, the Apocalypse, witness to the marked hostility of the Jews to 
 the Christians, and therefore to the marked separation of the Christian 
 communities. 1 The Jews of Palestine 'expelled' the Christians, says 
 St. Paul, and where this did not occur, the process is described by Dr. 
 Lightfoot as a secession resulting in the establishment of a separate 
 synagogue. There was no process of ' continuity without a break.' 
 
 3. The evidence for ' episcopus ' as an officer of contemporary guilds 
 is exceedingly slight. For this statement I need not add to the refer- 
 ences given above, except to mention that Harnack seems to agree as 
 to the inadequacy of the evidence : 2 ' Inquiries about the place or 
 character of such an office in civil constitutions do not afford any 
 solution of the problem. No other meaning can be given to the word 
 than that of "overseer"; but what sort of oversight such overseers 
 exercised cannot be more precisely determined. ' 
 
 4. Dr. Hatch underrates strangely the intense consciousness of the 
 Christians, especially of the Christian Apostles who organized the 
 Churches, that 'all things had become new.' Whatever elements of 
 organization or practice the Christian Church may have derived from 
 external sources, Jewish or even pagan, they were fused at once by the 
 'one Spirit' into the 'one body,' and gained with immense rapidity a 
 quite new set of associations. Christian institutions must be interpreted 
 from within as the Christians understood them. It is by a simple 
 application of this principle, in contrast to Dr. Hatch's method, that 
 Harnack reaches the speedy conclusion that ' bishops were originally 
 the directors of the worship, the offerers /car' e o~x.~i\v. They are called 
 overseers insomuch as they direct or superintend the assembly met for 
 worship. Out of this function all others have been necessarily 
 
 1 So even in the Didache (viii. i) we have the suggestive direction : 'Let your 
 fasts be not with the hypocrites ; for they fast on the second and fifth days of the 
 week, hut do ye fast on the fourth and the preparation day (Friday). Neither pray 
 ye as the hypocrites.' The language of the Apocalypse is also very noticeable, see 
 ii. 9 ; ' the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are a 
 synagogue of Satan.' Cf. i Thess. ii. 15, on the hostility of the Jews of Judaea, 
 ' who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and drove out us.' See Dr. 
 Lightfoot Philipp. p. 190, and a criticism of Dr. Hilgenfeld, in Zeitschr.f. -wissensch. 
 Theol. 1886, p. 5 : 'solcher Uebertritt ganzer oder fast ganzer jiidischer Gemeinden 
 zum Christus-Glauben wird sehr selten vorgekommen sein.' 
 
 2 Expositor I.e. p. 339.
 
 Note K. 373 
 
 developed.' 1 Probably if Prof. Harnack gave the weight he should 
 to some documents of the New Testament, he could somewhat modify 
 the decision, so far as to extend the original Oversight of the bishop to 
 all the concerns of the flock. But at least it is a decision based 
 primarily on an investigation of what Christians thought of their own 
 institutions, and the result is therefore the exaltation to the first place 
 of the spiritual function. Dr. Hatch, by his method of giving exag- 
 gerated weight to external associations and connections and ignoring 
 the primary evidence from within, as he dispiritualizes the episcopate, 
 so he does the same for the Eucharist. He rightly deduces the con- 
 nection of the bishop with the Eucharist from such passages as Justin 
 Martyr Apol. i. 67, and Ignatius ad Smyrn. 8, 2 but the nature of the 
 Eucharist may also be gathered from these passages, and how sub- 
 ordinate a place does charitable relief hold in it by comparison to its 
 great spiritual functions. How could it be otherwise when St. Paul 
 wrote of it as in i Cor. xi. 17-34 ? 
 
 Dr. Hatch's references, one may notice, do not always suggest the 
 idea in the text. For example, in support of the secular idea of the 
 eucharistic administration, he remarks that the offerings made by those 
 who were present at that service at first seem to have been of various 
 kinds ; but afterwards a rule was made limiting them to bread and 
 wine or corn and grapes (Afost. Can. 3) ; and still later, those which 
 were not consumed at the time were divided in fixed proportions 
 among the clergy (Afost. Const, viii. 31). But the canon he refers to 
 is suggestive of a view of the Eucharist very different from what he is 
 emphasizing ; it runs thus : ' If any bishop or presbyter, otherwise than 
 our Lord has ordained concerning the sacrifice, offer other things at the 
 altar, as honey, milk, or strong beer instead of wine, any necessaries 
 or birds or animals or pulse, otherwise than is ordained, let him be 
 deprived ; excepting grains of new corn, or ears of wheat, or bunches 
 of grapes in their season. For it is not lawful to offer anything besides 
 these at the altar, and oil for the holy lamp, and incense in the time of 
 the divine oblation. But let all other fruits be sent to the house of 
 the bishops as first-fruits to him and the presbyters.' 3 
 
 1 Expositor I.e. p. 342. 
 
 2 B. L. p. 40 note '& and pp. 79, 80. See in criticism Hilgenfeld I.e. p. 16 f. 
 
 3 Prof. Ramsay has recently (Ch. in R. E. p. 367) again suggested that the 
 ' episcopus ' did not originally hold a permanent office ; but that the name was given 
 to any presbyter appointed to ' superintend ' a special work, particularly that of 
 corresponding with foreign churches. But the ' episcopi ' of Phil. i. i, Acts xx. 28, 
 Tit. i. 5-9, Didack. 15, are permanent officials, identical with presbyters; and the 
 title ' episcopus ' is specially connected with the superintendence of the local Church, 
 Acts xx. 28, i Tim. iii. 5.
 
 374 Christian Ministry. 
 
 THE TEACHING OF THE TWELVE APOSTLES. 
 (Seep. 253.) 
 
 THIS document was discovered in a MS. in Constantinople and given 
 to the world in 1883 by Bryennius, the Patriarch of Nicomedia. 1 
 It may be conveniently divided into the following parts : 
 
 1. Rudimentary moral instructions about the two -ways of life and 
 
 death, as an address to catechumens just about to be baptized 
 (cc. i-vi); 2 
 
 2. Instructions to a community of Christians, addressed as a whole 
 
 about the proper method of baptizing, the Christian fasts, 
 the use of the Lord's Prayer, and the celebration of the 
 Eucharist (cc. vii-xi). 
 
 3. Further instructions about 'apostles' and 'prophets,' in their 
 
 relation to the local Church, about the Sunday service, and 
 about the election and functions of the local ministry of bishops 
 and deacons (cc. xi-xv). 
 
 4. A final section about the second coming of Christ (c. xvi). 
 
 The first section is a primitive version of the Two Ways, a piece of 
 moral instruction, perhaps originally Jewish, which appears in a great 
 variety of early Christian writings, 3 and this is the only part of the 
 
 1 For further information about this discovery also see Dr. Schaff The Oldest 
 Church Manual. 
 
 2 Of this portion, however, it may now be taken for proved that the passage from 
 i. 3 evAoyeiTe to ii. i Ti}s SiSa^i)? is a later interpolation. The document in its in- 
 terpolated form, or rather, perhaps, that on which the interpolation is based, is 
 early enough to be known to Hermas, see Schaff I.e. p. 233. But the Latin frag- 
 ment of the Didache (Schaff p. 219) and the Church Ordinances of Egypt (a docu- 
 ment based on the early portion of the Didache, and showing acquaintance with the 
 rest, see Schaff I.e. p. 237 f. and cf. c. 12 with Did. x. 3) show that this passage was 
 wanting in its earliest form ; cf. Dr. Taylor The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles 
 pp. 19-22 ; Dr. Warfield in the Bibliotheca Sacra, Jan. 1886, p. 115 f. That these 
 earlier chapters are a baptismal address is shown by the first words of c. vii ravra 
 Traira n'poenroi'Tes /SawTiVaTe , see Warfield l.c p. 151. 
 
 8 It is mentioned by Rufinus and Jerome under the titles of the Two Ways, or 
 the Judgment of Peter. Dr. Krawutzcky of Breslau two years before Bryennius' 
 publication had reconstructed this document from the uses of it by Christian writers 
 almost in the words of the Didache. Harnack speaks of this as ' a critical master- 
 piece, such as we can point to but few examples of in the history of literary criticism ' 
 ( Texte u.s.w. B. ii. H. i, 2. p. 208). Barnabas reproduces this Two Ways. ' We 
 are led to infer,' says Dr. Taylor (l.c. p. vii), ' that Barnabas in his Epistle surely 
 drew, if not from our very Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, from a tradition or
 
 Note L. 375 
 
 Didache which was permanently popular in at all its present shape. 1 
 In the second and third portions we recognise a primitive manual 
 of church directions, most probably drawn also in part from a 
 Jewish source, which are worked up into book vii of the Apostolical 
 Constitutions. There is a writing mentioned by Eusebius as TUV 
 airo<rT6\ui> al \ey6/j.evai SiSax a ^ > there is also a diSax^j KaXovfj^vij ruv 
 avo(rr6\d}v which Athanasius classes among ' the books not admitted 
 into the canon, but appointed by the Fathers to be read to those who 
 are just coming to us and desire to be instructed in the doctrine of 
 godliness ' ; but it is difficult to feel certain whether these references 
 are to the Didache as we have it. 2 
 
 The acquaintance with more than the earlier portion of our Didache^ 
 displayed apparently both in Barnabas' Epistle and in the Church 
 Ordinances? would be enough to guarantee for it a very early date. 
 But, in fact, the internal evidence does not allow us to doubt this. It 
 is the work plainly of a Jewish Christian. He is conscious enough of 
 his alienation from the Jews proper, whom he calls ' the hypocrites,' 4 
 and there is no sign of any insistence upon circumcision ; but we must 
 bear in mind that there was in the age preceding Christ's coming a 
 widely spread school of liberalized Jews, who had come to regard their 
 religion as ' the school of the knowledge of God and of the spiritual 
 life for the whole world ' * and a Jew of this sort who had accepted 
 Christ as the Messiah and become a member of His Church as being 
 the way of life and learnt ardently to desire His second coming to 
 establish His kingdom such a Christianized Jew, living or having 
 lived under circumstances which made him acquainted with the vices 
 of the Grseco- Roman civilization, 8 must have been the author of our 
 Teaching. 
 
 writing of which it has preserved the original form." Clement remarks ' that the 
 gospel and the apostles, like all the prophets, suggest the idea of two ways' (Strom. 
 v. 5. 31. quoted by Warfield I.e. p. 139). It of course resembles the Choice of 
 Heracles. 
 
 1 For example the Church Ordinances shows acquaintance with, but does not use, 
 the latter part, see Harnack I.e. ii. 230. 
 
 - See on this Salmon Introd. pp. 608, 613 ; cf. also p. 603, where he notices that 
 in Rufinus' list of the canonical and ecclesiastical books, based on Athanasius, where 
 the latter mentions the Didache, Rufinus speaks of the Dua Via. It should also 
 be mentioned that a legitimate doubt has been expressed, based on a calculation of 
 the number of OTI'XOI, whether the Teaching mentioned by Nicephorus can be the 
 whole of our manual, cf. Salmon Introd. p. 601 ; and on patristic refs. Schaff. I.e. 
 p. 114 f. 
 
 3 For Barnabas, see Schaff I.e. p. 227, and for the Ch. Ord. p. 238. 
 
 * viii. i, 2. , 
 
 5 This is Athanasius' account of Judaism (de Incarn. c. 12). On the liberal 
 Judaism of the Roman empire, see Harnack Dogmengefch. i. p. 73 f. 
 8 See the list of vices which characterize the way of death, c. v.
 
 376 Christian Ministry. 
 
 The moral instruction is of an intensely Jewish character. It is 
 indeed not wholly Christian not by any means on the level of the 
 Sermon on the Mount, or of St. James who has so profound a grasp 
 on the principles of the 'law of liberty.' It belongs rather to the 
 enlightened synagogue than to the illuminated Church. ' Whatsoever 
 thou wouldst not have dotie tothee, neither do thou to another.' 'Thou 
 shall not hate any man, but some thou shalt rebuke, and for some 
 thou shalt pray, and some thou shalt love above thine own soul.' ' If 
 thou hast, thou shalt give with thine hands as a ransom for thy sins. ' 
 ' Fast for those who persecute you. ' ' Let your fasts not be with the 
 hypocrites : for they fast on the second day and the fifth, but do ye 
 fast on the fourth day and the Preparation [Friday].' 'If thou canst 
 bear the whole yoke of the Lord, thou shalt be perfect ; but if thou 
 canst not, what thou art able to do, that do. As regards food, bear 
 what thou canst. But from that which has been offered to an idol, be 
 greatly on thy guard. For it is the service of dead gods.' 1 This im- 
 pression of a Jewish tone about the moral teaching is deepened at every 
 step of closer study. 
 
 Once again, the regulations given about baptism are thoroughly 
 Jewish in character. In what sense ? Not because they are minute 
 regulations, but because baptism seems to be regarded, as a half- 
 Christianized Jew might regard it, as a prescribed ordinance, not as a 
 means of grace. He seems to have no grasp at all of the sacramental 
 principle. Baptism and (as we shall see) the Eucharist are ordinances 
 of the Gospel, like prayer and fasting and alms-giving nothing more. 8 
 
 1 This advice about ' bearing the yoke ' and ' bearing the burden ' of Jewish 
 observance only up to a man's power, reveals the intensely Jewish atmosphere out 
 of which it comes. It carries us back in its very language to the circumstances of 
 the Apostolic Council (Acts xv. 10-28). Taylor has admirable remarks on the 
 regulations about fasting (p. 58 f.), and on the whole passage about ' the two ways.' 
 ' There remains (when the interpolated portion is removed) little or nothing dis- 
 tinctively Christian in the first part of the Teaching.' It is also very noticeable that 
 in place of our Lord's spiritualizing of the law, which makes the inward sin of inten- 
 tion equivalent to the outward act of commission (St. Matt. v. 28), we have in c. iii 
 a Jewish method of ' making a fence to the law,' which is a very different thing ; ' Be 
 not lustful, for lust leads to fornication,' etc." See Taylor, p. 23. 
 
 2 The mention of the Wednesday and Friday fasts, and of the threefold repetition 
 of the Lord's Prayer, with the doxology (which, however, took the place of the 
 Amen, and no more belonged to the Lord's Prayer than to any other prayer ; 
 see x. 5, and Taylor p. 67), is very interesting as carrying back these practices to 
 such very primitive times. Indeed, the whole evidence of the Teaching goes to 
 increase our belief in the early or Judaeo-Christian origin of the ritual regulations of 
 the Christian Church. Further, the regulations about baptism have a very high 
 interest (i) As emphasizing that baptism ' into the name of the Lord ' is baptism 
 performed ' into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost ' ; 
 see ix. 5, vii. i. (2) For the evidence of the use of 'trine affusion' in the 
 earliest Church, vii. 3. (3) For the prescription of fasting for the baptizer and
 
 Note L. 377 
 
 The meagreness and inadequacy of the whole conception of the 
 Eucharist strikes every one at once. It is fenced indeed by the pre- 
 liminary requirement of baptism 1 and the injunction of previous public 
 confession of sins 2 ; it is regarded as the Christian sacrifice 3 or thank- 
 offering, 4 in which is fulfilled the prophecy of Malachi about the ' pure 
 sacrifice' of the new covenant; (xiv. 3), and which, it is probably 
 implied, our Lord alluded to when he spoke of 'bringing our gift 
 to the altar ' 5 ; it is also called spiritual food and drink (unless indeed 
 these words refer to the teaching of Christ), 6 and is celebrated in 
 definite anticipation of His second coming (x. 6) : but the whole con- 
 ception of it is more Jewish than Christian. 7 Sabatier says truly : 
 
 the baptized. This practice in the case of the baptizer did not apparently die out, 
 as the commentators seem to think : see St. Chrysostom's answer to his accusers, 
 Ep. cxxv. p. 668 '. KaCeAfYoucrai' Kal rov HavAof 05 /xcra TO SeurvTJcrat 6XdicAi)poi' 
 rbv olieov e0ajjT7ei'. He seems to mean that St. Paul baptized after eating, and that 
 this would be an ecclesiastical offence. He is, however, forgetting the order of 
 events in the original passage, Acts xvi. 33, 34 ; and the context possibly makes his 
 meaning ambiguous. (4) For the bearing of these Judaic regulations on the history 
 of infant baptism. The Christian Church would presumably have carried on the 
 Jewish practice of infant baptism. See Taylor on the ' little proselytes,' pp. 55-58 
 (very suggestive on the theory of infant baptism) ; and Sabatier La Didachi pp. 84- 
 88 : ' L'Eglise, en donnant au bapteme une signification nouvelle, ne s'ecarta cepen- 
 dant pas beaucoup dans le principe de la discipline du bapteme juif.' 
 
 1 ix. 5. 
 
 2 xiv. i : irpo[<r]ef oftoXoyrjirafievoi. ra n-apanTiujxara v(tMi>, cf. iv. 14 : 'In the 
 Church thou shall confess thy transgressions,' i.e. before public prayer. This throws 
 a strong light on the history of public confession in the Christian Church, see St. 
 James v. 14-16, i St. John i. 9 (Westcott's note). This confession is still maintained 
 in Canons of Hippolytus c. ii., but in the later Apostolical Constitutions (vii. 14), it 
 is turned into ' Thou shall confess thy sins to the Lord thy God.' 
 
 3 xiv. i. 
 
 4 c. ix. ' Eucharist ' is clearly used technically. Thus the Didache throws back 
 the date of the technical use of the word. 
 
 8 xiv. 2 : ' Let no man wjio has a dispule wilh his fellow come together with you 
 until they be reconciled [6ta\\a.yia<riv, cf. St. Matt. v. 24], thai your sacrifice be not 
 defiled,' seems to refer to the saying of our Lord. 
 
 8 x. 3. See Sabatier I.e. p. 104. 
 
 7 See Salmon Introd. p. 607. Thus the Prayer of Thanksgiving over the bread is 
 reproduced as a sort of ' grace before meat ' in the pseudo-Athanasius de Virginitate 
 13 ; see Schaff I.e. p. 194. There is nothing in it to raise it above the level of such 
 a use. There are, however, indications that these prayers in the Didache are really 
 prayers for the Agape, and that the actual communion is meant to occur after x. 6. 
 The word Eucharist may well include the Agape. Thus ihe cup in ix. 2 corresponds 
 (cf. St. Luke xxii. 17) to the second paschal cup. The expression 'after being 
 filled ' (x. i) refers to the preliminary eating, and Dr. Taylor quotes a most suggestive 
 parallel from Jewish language about the passover, I.e. p. 130: ' The chagigah was 
 eaten first that the passover might be eaten after being filled." Thus the occurrence 
 of the Holy Communion after the Agape would rest upon a Jewish practice. Then 
 the exclamations of Did. x. 6 : 'If any one is holy, let him come : if any one is not, 
 let him repent,' refer, as they naturally should, to the subsequent ealing of the holy 
 things. This again would explain the meaning of the rule of xi. 9, thai ihe prophet
 
 Christian Ministry. 
 
 c Our document cannot but surprise those who read for the first time its 
 liturgy of the Eucharist. We have here a form without analogy any- 
 where. It separates itself much less from the Jewish ritual than from 
 the Christian.' ' It is an ordinary repast just touched by a breath of 
 religious mysticism, such as is the outcome of the importance which 
 belongs, in Jewish and oriental idea, to repasts taken in common.' 1 
 There is, in fact, nothing to recall to our mind our Lord's words in 
 the institution of the Eucharist, of which, we must remark, we have 
 the form given us in St. Paul's Epistle to the Corinthians, nothing 
 to recall to us St. Paul's language about the significance of the com- 
 munion. It is a Jewish feast Christianized in a measure by the 
 recognition of the Messiahship of Christ and the expectation of His 
 second coming. 
 
 It must not indeed be supposed that the mere absence of later ritual 
 would mean the absence of sacramental idea. This view has been 
 combated already (pp. 164, 165). We find in some cases an absence 
 of elaborate ritual coinciding with the fullest appreciation of the 
 spiritual efficacy of a sacrament. In the Teaching it is the idea 
 that is absent. This falls in further with the absence of grasp on 
 the principle of the Incarnation. Of course Trinitarian doctrine 
 is implied in the use of the Trinitarian formula of baptism, 2 but 
 the author seems to be quite uninfluenced by the teaching of St. 
 Paul, St. Peter, and St. John on the Incarnation and the Atonement 
 and the Holy Spirit. 3 The Christology indeed is barely as full 
 
 who ' orders a table in the spirit ' is, as a test of his disinterestedness, not to eat of 
 it: he is not to eat of the Agape, not to ' fill himself,' and is, of course, to com- 
 municate at the subsequent Eucharist. This interpretation of the ' eucharistic ' 
 prayers would seem the most natural, I think, but for the immense difficulty for 
 suggesting a reason for the silence about the Holy Communion, unless we can in- 
 troduce the idea of reserve about 'the mysteries': cf. Taylor I.e. p. v. Perhaps, 
 however, the difficulty is less great if these benedictions are based on formulas in use 
 amongst the Jews at religious meals, as seems very probable ; see Rendall Theol. of 
 Hebr. Chr. p. 89 f. 
 
 1 Sabatier I.e. pp. 109, 112. 
 
 2 Schaff maintains that the author of the Didache in the phrase ' Hosanna to the 
 God of David ' (x. 6) refers to Christ as God. If the reading is right, however, it 
 more probably refers to the Father. Nor does the ' Lord ' of xiv. 3 seem to refer to 
 Christ as the Messiah of the Old Testament. It is a simple reference to the words 
 of the original. It is not that the author is heretical, but he is inadequate. 
 
 3 It is indeed well open to question whether he had any acquaintance with their 
 writings : 
 
 (a) His supposed references to St. Paul are not at all convincing. Did. iii. i : 
 ' Flee from evil and all that is like it ' is a reference not to i Thess. v. 22, but to a 
 Jewish saying (see Taylor, p. 24) ; v. 2 : ov KoXAujaecoi ayafcjT ovfie jcpiVei Siicaia 
 does suggest Rom. xii. 9, but xoAAacrdat is a common word e.g. with St. Luke. 
 IIvev/taTiicr) rpo<f( cal TTOTO? (x. 3) applied to the Gospel or the Eucharist does not 
 necessarily depend upon i Cor. x. 3, 4. The connection of the Church's unity with
 
 Note L. 379 
 
 as that of the early speeches in the Acts. Perhaps, however, we 
 can best characterize the tone of the Didache by saying that it would 
 represent the beliefs of a Jewish Christianity yet unleavened by 
 the deeper 'teaching of the Apostles,' which was to follow that first 
 earnest emphasis on the Messiahship of Jesus, of which the early 
 chapters of the Acts give us the record. 1 
 Of course there is teaching implied in the writing which is not given. 
 
 the unity of the bread in Did. ix. 4 is strikingly different from that in i Cor. x. 17, 
 and the account of Antichrist in c. xvi. shows great independence of St. Paul's 
 treatment, though acquaintance with the idea that he is using. 
 
 (J>) The reference in i. 4 to i Peter ii. n occurs in the interpolated portion (cf. also 
 4 Mace. i. 32). 
 
 (f) The supposed references to St. John seem on examination to be very uncon- 
 vincing. The Vine of David (ix. 2) is the Church, not Christ, and suggests there-, 
 fore ignorance of St. John xv. The phrase (x. 2) evxopicrovn.e'i' <roi irdrep oyie, 
 iurep rov ayiou ovofiaros <rov, oC Ka.re<Ticr)via<ra.s ev Tats xapSt'at; vfiiov [rn.<av] Kal virep 
 rrjs yi/(iaea>9 KCU irt'oTeco? Kai adai'acri'ac >7? eyi'tipio'as >)/Jtii' 6ia 'Ii)crov roO iratSot <rov 
 is in fact a reference to Jerem. vii. 12 caTeovoivoxra TO QVOJJ.O. f*ov, and further 
 suggests familiarity with the language used in the early chapters of the Acts, ii. 28 
 eypcipio'ds fioi oSous UTJ;, iii. 13 o ayios irais "iTjcrov?, cf. iii. 26, iv. 27-30, language 
 which again is in direct reference to the Old Testament. St. John never uses 
 iOavavia or yvtacrts. Indeed ' Holy Father ' is the only phrase which recalls St. 
 John in his report of our Lord's Prayer, and our author is fond of the word ayior. 
 Altogether there is no reason to think he knew St. John's Gospel. 
 
 (ft) Did the author of the Didache know either of the other Gospels ? The Lord's 
 Prayer and the baptismal formula would be an element in any tradition. Beyond 
 these we have only a record of those ' sententious ' sayings of our Lord, such as are 
 most easily handed down in real tradition : oi Trpaeis jeATipovofujo-ovo-i TTJV yijv, /x>) 
 Stare TO ayiov TOII (cueriV, af 105 6 epydnjs TTJ? Tpo<f>7J oirrou (iii. 7, ix. 5, xiii. 2). The 
 acquaintance with our Lord's eschatological discourses, shown in c. xvi, is very 
 independent of the Gospels. He refers to ' the gospel of the Lord ' (xv. 4), but it 
 is doubtful whether it is a document. See, however, on the whole question, Taylor 
 pp. 108-112. 
 
 1 Certainly the connection of the Didache with the language of St. Peter's first 
 sermons, and the phraseology of these chapters, is very striking. It is more than a 
 coincidence of mere language. 
 
 (a) With ix. 2 'ITJO-OWS 6 jrait o-ov, cf. Acts iii. 13, 26, iv. 27, 30. See Clement's 
 Epistle, c. 59. In Mart. Polyc. 74, as in the Apost. Const., it has a new meaning ; 
 it is no longer servant as in the Didache (used alike of David and Jesus in the same 
 clause), with reference to the ' servant of Jehovah ' in Isaiah ; it has got the meaning 
 of ' Son ' ' My beloved Son.' See Lightfoot on Clement, in lac. 
 
 (*) With x. 2 quoted above, and ix. 2, cf. Acts ii. 28., eyi/oipto-ds /ioi 6Sou? fw^f. 
 
 (c) For the whole idea of the Acts, ii. 42 1\<rav Se jrpoo-<eoprpouvT<r TJJ SiSaxj) ri> 
 airoa-Totaav. . . . 177 K\aL<rtL TOV aprov Kal TOIS irpo<Tfv\a.l<;, cf. ix. 3, xiv. I, Tb 
 (cAa<r/ia, icXdo-OTe aprov. 
 
 (d) With iv. 8 o-vy<coic(o^o-eis Se iravra rta ao(\<t><? o-ou Kal OVK epett Kia etyat, cf. 
 Acts iv. 32 ovoe (l<; TI . . . eAeyev ISiov tlvai . . . airavra. icoti/a. 
 
 () For the coupling of fasting and prayer, cf. Acts xiii. 3. 
 
 (/) With vi. 1-3, on 'bearing the yoke,' and 'guarding oneself from that which is 
 offered to an idol,' cf. Acts xv. 10-28. 
 
 (g) ' The way ' of life suggests the use of ' the way ' in the Acts as a synonym fo r 
 Christianity.
 
 380 Christian Ministry. 
 
 Why should Christians ' fast on Wednesday and Friday ' ? The answer 
 to this question at, least implies a record of historical facts about our 
 Lord, though not more. Why should God be glorified 'through 
 Jesus Christ ' (ix. 4) ? Here is involved some doctrine of mediation. 
 Why are Christians baptized into the name of the Son and the Spirit 
 as well as of the Father ? This must carry with it some teaching about 
 the Persons represented by these Divine names. Thus there is a 
 teaching implied which is not given, and apparently, we must add, 
 not realized. 
 
 Our mind naturally goes back to those Jewish Christians to whom 
 the Epistle to the Hebrews was written. Here were Christians who 
 only half realized what their religion meant who knew its ' first 
 principles,' those which a Jew could most easily realize 'repent- 
 ance from dead works and faith toward God, the teaching of baptisms 
 and of laying-on hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal 
 judgment.' Is not the Christianity of this Teaching very much the 
 sort of inadequate Christianity which the author of the Epistle to the 
 Hebrews sought to lift into a complete realization of the divine majesty 
 of Christ, of the mystery of His eternal high-priesthood and the 
 Church's fellowship with Him and in Him? Not indeed that our 
 document presents all the features of the Judaism which the author 
 of that great Epistle had in view ; there is no sign here of falling away, 
 no craving after the ' worldly ' ritual of the old covenant ; but the 
 instruction given in the Didache embodies ' first principles ' closely 
 resembling those which the Hebrews had made their own : the belief 
 in God and the moral duties of obedience and repentance which follow 
 from that belief; the due and careful performance of the ceremonial 
 and religious duties of religion and the reverence due to its teachers ; 
 the keen expectation of ' the end ' and the coming of the kingdom, 
 with the judgment and the resurrection. 1 
 
 We have then to do with a Jewish Christian document of very early 
 date. Sabatier would have us put it back as early as the middle of 
 the first century, before St. Paul's Epistles, but it is perhaps more 
 likely that its author escaped the influence of St. Paul by remoteness 
 of situation rather than by priority in the date of his writing. In any 
 case, we can with very great security date the Didache within the first 
 century. Not only does its whole tone remind us of the Jewish cradle 
 of Christianity, but other indications coincide with this. The Church's 
 enemy is as yet simple imposture and self-seeking, and there are no 
 traces of any prevalent heresy. Again, the state of the Christian 
 
 1 Sabatier calls attention to the entire absence of any mention of women, as 
 emphasizing its Jewish origin and early date (p. 153): 'La plupart des documents 
 d'origine juive ignorent la femme.'
 
 Note M. 381 
 
 ministry, which is discussed elsewhere, suggests a date long anterior 
 to Ignatius. 1 
 
 Have we any grounds on which to fix the district in which the 
 Didache was written ? 
 
 Harnack's suggestion of Alexandria or Egypt seemed to some of us 
 excluded by the physical features alluded to in the words ' the bread 
 scattered upon the mountains and gathered together.' 2 On the other 
 hand Dr. Taylor remarked (p. 116) : ' Sowing upon the mountains suits 
 no place better than northern Palestine. ' (Or it seemed agreeable to Syria 
 in general. ) Other indications were felt to point in the same direction. 
 Thus, in vii. 2, there is a remarkable permission to baptize in warm 
 water, where cold could not safely be used, and ' it stands recorded 
 in the Gemara that a fruitless attempt was made in the days of 
 R. Jehoshua ben Levi (cent, ii-iii) to obtain dispensation from the 
 practice of purificatory immersion in certain cases, in the interest of 
 the women of Galilee, who were said to be afflicted with barrenness by 
 the cold. But it was permitted to warm the water for the use of the 
 high-priest on the Day of Atonement, if he was aged or delicate' 
 (Taylor, pp. 54 ) The Christian Judaism of Galilee would appear 
 here as granting to all what Pharisaic Judaism refused. Again, before 
 the publication of this document, Drs. Westcott and Hort had declared 
 that there ' could be little doubt that the doxology [to the Lord's 
 Prayer] originated in liturgical use in Syria,' 3 and that doxology 
 appears in our manual as a substitute for the Amen in Jewish fashion 
 at the end of the eucharistic thanksgiving, as well as the Lord's Prayer. 4 
 
 The present writer was therefore inclined to assign the document 
 to Palestine or Syria, and to give the preference to an out-of-the-way 
 district, such as that beyond the Jordan. 
 
 But the basis of this argument has now been undermined in part by 
 the appearance in the eucharistic prayer of Bishop Serapion (see 
 Wordsworth's Serapion' s Prayer Book p. 17) of the phrase from the 
 Didache ' as this bread has been scattered on the top of the mountains, 
 and gathered together, came to be one.' This destroys the argument 
 
 1 See also Taylor, p. 118. 
 
 2 ix. 4 : this argument was fortified by the fact that the words etroVu nil/ bpi<av 
 are omitted in the grace before meat for use in Egypt, which is referred to above as 
 reproducing this prayer. 
 
 3 New Testament Notes on Select Readings p. 9. Harnack calls attention to 
 the omission of i) /SeuriAcia before ^ 5vVaju.it icai ^ Sofa. This omission occurs also in 
 the Sahidic (Egyptian) version. This he thinks is a ' subtle ' indication of Egyptian 
 origin (I.e. p. 26). But the same reading appears in Gregory of Nyssa. It was 
 probably the original Jewish form. 
 
 4 viii. 2, x. 5. It is hardly /air to quote the Aramaean Maranatha (x. 6) as an 
 indication of Palestinian origin, in view of i Cor. xvi. 22. I suppose the produce of 
 the land from which first-fruits are to be taken cattle, flocks, corn, wine, oil would 
 suit most eastern countries.
 
 382 Christian Ministry. 
 
 from physical features (see p. 417 and note 3 ) and strengthens the claim 
 of Egypt to be the place of its origin. Still the Egyptian Church, as 
 it got the canons of Hippolytus from Rome, may have got the Didache 
 from Syria. 
 
 M 
 
 DR. HORT'S VIEW OF THE APOSTOLATE. 
 (See p. 202.) 
 
 DR. HORT speaks of himself J as ' led to the conclusion that in its 
 original sense the term Apostle was not intended to describe the 
 habitual relation of the Twelve to our Lord during the days of His 
 ministry, but strictly speaking only the mission among the villages,' of 
 which the beginning is described in St. Mark vi. 12, and the end in 
 St. Mark vi. 30. He admits that in St. Luke's Gospel ' the term is not 
 throughout confined to this limited usage.' 2 In fact the word is used 
 six times in St. Luke, and only once in connection with this special 
 mission. St. John does not use the word at all as a designation for the 
 Twelve. St. Matthew uses it once in the list of the Twelve (x. 2) in 
 such a way as to suggest that it was an habitual name for them (' now 
 the names of the twelve apostles are these '), and not as connected with 
 any particular mission. Finally, in St. Mark the word is used (for 
 certain) only once (vi. 30), and as it were accidentally, of the Twelve 
 when they returned from the special mission alluded to. And its 
 appearance of exclusive reference to that mission in St. Mark's narrative 
 depends (i) on the doubtful reading of iii. 14, 'And He appointed 
 twelve [whom also He named apostles] that they might be with him, 
 and that he might send them forth to f reach and to have authority to 
 cast out devils ' 3 ; and (2) also on the limitation of the words in italics 
 to the mission subsequently described in similar terms in vi. 12, 13. 
 But just before (ver. 7) the words occur, ' He began to send them forth.' 
 This first mission was only a type of much that was to come. It was 
 not the entire scope of their apostolate, but the first example of it. On 
 the whole, I think it must be admitted that Dr. Hort's proposed 
 limitation of the original meaning of the term ' apostle ' is very weakly 
 supported by the evidence. 
 
 But it is a more important matter that he denies (on the whole) that 
 the apostolate was even finally an office of government constituted by 
 our Lord in His Church. He does indeed use the word ' office ' (p. 19) 
 
 1 The Christian Ecclesia (Macmillan 1897), p. 28. " P. 26. 
 
 3 On the reading see Swete in lac. The words in brackets are in the margin of the 
 R.V. There is a great deal to be said for attributing them to assimilation to St. 
 Luke vi. 13.
 
 Note M. 383 
 
 of the Twelve, 1 and speaks of a ' distinctive function reserved for them 
 throughout, over and above their function as the chiefest disciples ' 
 (p. 29). But he says (p. 84), ' there is indeed, as we have seen, no 
 trace in Scripture of a formal commission of authority for government 
 from Christ Himself. Their commission was to be witnesses for 
 Himself, and to bear that witness by preaching and by healing.' He 
 thinks that the actual authority in matter of government and administra- 
 tion which in the Acts they are found exercising was due to the 
 ' spontaneous homage ' of the Christians of Judaea, and was a result of 
 the moral authority involved in their personal qualification. He thinks 
 it very doubtful how far their authority ' is likely to have been felt and 
 acknowledged beyond the limits of the Holy Land.' In other words 
 (p. 230), their definite function was simply to be witnesses and to 
 make their witness known. ' Round this, their definite function, grew 
 up in process of time an indefinite authority, the natural and right and 
 necessary consequence of their unique position,' but 'it came to the 
 apostles by the ordinary action of divine providence, not (as far as we 
 can see) by any formal divine command.' ' The apostles were not in 
 any proper sense officers of the ecclesia.' 
 
 Now this is (for the argument of this book) an exceedingly important 
 matter (see Preface, p. vii), and I would endeavour here to show how 
 contrary to the evidence as a whole, in my judgment, Dr. Hort's theory 
 is. I have in Chap, iv collected the evidence for saying that the 
 Twelve were really (as has been almost universally supposed) trained 
 and appointed to be officers of the Christian Church for the purposes 
 of government. Of that evidence only a part is noticed by Dr. Hort. 
 Thus he does not notice our Lord's answer to Peter about the 
 'stewardship' in the 'household of servants' (Luke xii. 41-43, see 
 above p. 203). He does indeed very briefly discuss St. Matt. xvi. 19 
 (' I will give unto thee the keys,' etc.), but it is only for the purpose of 
 determining the relation of ' the Church ' to ' the kingdom of heaven,' 
 and even so the words are exceedingly disappointing and ambiguous. 2 
 ' The simplest inference from the language used would be that the 
 office committed to St. Peter and the rest with respect to the ecclesia, 
 would enable him and them to fulfil the office here described as 
 committed to him with respect to the kingdom of heaven.' An office 
 to be intrusted by Christ Himself to the apostles in relation to the 
 Church (and surely a tremendous office to open and shut the kingdom 
 of heaven) is here apparently incidentally admitted, but no further 
 
 1 See also p. 160 : ' The apostolate of the Twelve and St. Paul was in an 
 important sense a definite and permanent office." (But by appointment from the 
 ecclesia 7) 
 
 2 P. 19. We must remember the work is posthumous. Dr. Hort could hardly have 
 left the sentence as it stands.
 
 384 Christian Ministry. 
 
 consideration is given to this (I cannot but think) really luminous and 
 central passage (see above p. 204), and the admission for what it is 
 worth is not alluded to further. 1 Once more, I have, like many others, 
 argued that the commissions after the Resurrection (i) appear to be 
 given distinctively to the Twelve, and (2) that they are commissions to an 
 abiding apostolate. On point (l) Dr. Hort only says that 'doubt is 
 possible ' (p. 33), and ' granting that it was probably to the eleven 
 that our Lord directly and principally spoke on both these occasions 
 (and even to them alone when He spoke the words at the end of 
 St. Matthew's Gospel), yet it still has to be considered in what capacity 
 they were addressed by Him.' I say that the words of the commissions 
 themselves bear witness that they were addressed to them as envoys, 
 apostles representatives no doubt of the missionary and judicial 
 functions of the whole Church, but representatives because they were 
 divinely commissioned officers ('apostles,' ' stewards,' ' pastors') in the 
 society. 
 
 Once more, I have argued that ' if the Acts is accepted as historical, 
 undoubtedly the apostles must have received a commission distinct 
 from the Church as a whole to account for their position ' (p. 210 n. 2 ). 
 Dr. Hort surely greatly minimizes the position of the apostolate in the 
 Acts. He does not notice that St. Peter at once alludes to the 
 apostolate of Judas, as an office of administration which is vacant and 
 should be filled up. He alludes to the words SiaKovia and aTrooToXiJ as 
 used by St. Peter (i. 25), but not to the phrase quoted from the Psalm, 
 ' his office (firiffKowfi) let another take ' (i. 20). Moreover it appears 
 to most of us that it is plainly in virtue of their apostolate that the 
 Twelve stand forth from the first as having authority in the community. 
 There is no trace of their position growing from spontaneous homage. 
 They assume the right to ' appoint ' the seven, whom the Church as a 
 whole are to choose (vi. 3). In fact, if certain men have authority to 
 impart the gift of the Holy Ghost by the laying-on of their hands, 
 whether for living or for governing (and only of apostles is such a phrase 
 used 2 ), this gift of the Holy Ghost being the essential constituent of 
 the Christian life, such men are rendered by this very power necessary 
 and central authorities in the community. 
 
 Again, Dr. Hort thinks Barnabas was sent to Antioch (xi. 22) in 
 place of one of the Twelve to avoid ' putting forth even the semblance 
 
 1 Dr. Sanday similarly deals to my mind very inadequately with this passage (The 
 Conception of Priesthood p. 48). He says, ' a similar promise ' is given to the whole 
 body, i.e. in xviii. 18. But without the distinctive and definite words for stewardship , 
 ' the keys of the kingdom of heaven. 1 These words connect themselves with the 
 stewardship of St. Luke xii. 41. The legislative authority (' binding ' or ' loosing ') 
 belongs in some sense to the Church as a whole. The stewardship is an office in the 
 Church committed to the apostle. 
 
 ' Acts viii. 18, xix. 1-7 ; Rom. i. 11 ; 2 Tim. i. 6.
 
 Note M. 385 
 
 of apostolic authority there ' (p. 60) ; but there is not a word in the 
 narrative to suggest this : and when the great question was raised at 
 Antioch about circumcising the Gentiles, certainly the Church there 
 appears to recognise an authority at Jerusalem. That authority, after 
 being appealed to and deliberating, sends them a decision by letter and 
 messengers (xv. 2-31) 'it seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us 
 to lay upon you ' such and such necessary ' burdens ' and requirements 
 and no more. And it is implied in the course of this letter that though 
 they had in fact given no authorisation ' no commandment ' to those 
 who had gone to Antioch previously and stirred up dissension, yet they 
 might have done so. They had authority to ' give commandment. ' 
 The letter goes out in the name of the ' apostles and elder brethren ' 
 at Jerusalem. I have spoken of it as 'representing substantially' 
 the authority of the apostles. Dr. Sanday complains this is not 
 'strict exegesis.' Does this mean that it does not inhere in the 
 particular words (xv. 23) taken by themselves ? It certainly does not. 
 But what gave the Church at Jerusalem authority to send a mission of 
 this kind to another Church ? The whole Acts would assure us it was 
 because the Church at Jerusalem contained the apostles and the 
 apostles were the Church's authoritative teachers and centre of unity. 
 
 Further, Dr. Hort, in restricting the authority of the apostles to 
 Jerusalem, has not considered all the language which St. Paul uses (see 
 above p. 215 ff. ) to describe the authority which he conceives to belong 
 to him ' in all the Churches ' equally, ' for edification not destruction ' 
 but with 'destructive' powers attached, simply because he is an 
 apostle. He only notices where St. Paul does not (he says) assert it 
 viz., in his letter to the Romans. The ' total absence (in this epistle) 
 of any claim to authority illustrates how large a part of the authority 
 which he exercised towards other ecclesiae was not official (so to speak) 
 but personal' the authority of a founder (pp. 133, 197). Now no 
 doubt it is in accordance with St. Paul's tact that he would not speak of 
 authority to those who did not know him. But even here he justifies 
 his ' boldness ' in addressing them by the fact of the universal and quasi- 
 priestly mission divinely given him towards the whole Gentile world (xv. 
 15-17). Here is the ground of an authority which he must exercise 
 according to his judgment of fitness whether at Rome or elsewhere. 
 
 On the whole, Dr. Hort's argument against the existence of an 
 apostolic office of government ordained by Christ Himself is singularly 
 unconvincing. He does not deal at all satisfactorily either with the 
 language of the Gospels, or with the position assigned to the apostles in 
 the Acts, or with the claim which St. Paul plainly attached to the 
 apostolic office or stewardship, and which he delegates to his repre- 
 sentatives, Timothy and Titus, as, according to Dr. Hort's own phrase, 
 ' a paramount authority ' (p. 197) at Ephesus and Crete. 
 
 2 B
 
 INDEX. 
 
 AARON : see Levitical Priesthood. 
 
 Absolutism 88. 
 
 Achatius, Acts of bp. 194 n. 
 
 Achelis(Dr.) 1320., 133 n., 13711. 
 
 Acts of Apostles 4, 5 ; witness to visible 
 Church 41, 42 ; to hierarchy 234, 242. 
 
 Adamnan 151 n. 
 
 Addaeus 119 n. 
 
 Aerius 126 n., 147-8, 197. 
 
 Africa 149. 
 
 Age of ordinands 277 n. 
 
 Albinus Flaccus 82 n. ; (pseudo-) 16711., 
 260 n., 325, 337 n., 347, 351. 
 
 Alcibiades 357. 
 
 Alexander Severus 92. 
 
 Alexandria, Church of 93, 131, 135 n., 
 188 n., 253, 339, 341, 345-6, 351-2, 381 ; 
 theology of 21-5, 54 ; succession at 
 122-4; episcopate and presbyterate 
 124-130, 308, 325-3; Jews at 364 n. 
 
 Allen (Prof.) 51 n. 
 
 Amalarius 26011., 325, 336 n., 348. 
 
 Ambrose (St.) 87, 1460., 220 n., 363; 
 
 (pseudo-) 186 n. 
 
 Ambrosiaster : on orig. identity of bishop 
 and presbyter 12611., 157-162, 251 n., 
 aSon., 325 ; on the ministry 185, 344-6, 
 
 354- 
 
 Ammia 357, 361. 
 Ammonius (abbot) 341. 
 Ananias 236 n. 
 
 Andrew (St.) in Asia Minor 264. 
 Andronicus 213 n., 254 n. 
 Anencletus 112, 295. 
 Angels (in Apocalypse) 128 n., 232-3. 
 Anicetus 18, non., 112, 116. 
 Anselm(St.) 150 n. 
 Antioch 118, 279. 
 Apocalypse, angels of the 233-3. 
 Apollinaris (Claudius) 119. 
 Apollonius 358-9. 
 886 
 
 Apollos 240. 
 
 Apologists, the 25-7. 
 
 Apophtheginata Patrum 330. 
 
 Apostle, meaning of word 213 n. 
 
 Apostles (Syrian) 259. 
 
 Apost. Canons 174 n., 175 n., 176 n. ; 373. 
 
 Apost. Constitutions, date of 131 ; rites 
 n 137. 351-2, 354, 373, 377 n-! " the 
 ministry 137-40 ; 148 n., 168 n., 184, 
 185 n., 260 n., 275 n., 276, 289 n., 362, 
 
 375- 
 
 Apostolic commission 209 f., 242 f. 
 Apostolic delegates 225. 
 
 Apostolic functions 63 n.., 213 f. 
 
 Apostolic ordinations 262 f . 
 
 Apostolic succession 63 f., 104, 160, 290-1, 
 306, 311-2 ; bond of continuity 69 ; 
 importance of principle 65 f. ; meeting 
 moral needs of ministers 73-5 ; pledge 
 of dependence 70-3 ; true to analogy 
 64-5 ; witness of history to 102 f. 
 
 Apostolic successors 275-7. 
 
 Archippus 225 n., 345. 
 
 Arethas 233 n. 
 
 Aristides 25, Son. 
 
 Aristion 264. 
 
 Aristotle 46, 72-3. 
 
 Asia, Church of 106, 112, 119, 263-4. 
 
 Athanasius (St.) 54, 123 n., 126, 129 n., 
 13', 157, i?7 n., 181, 197, 329-30, 339, 
 341, 354, 375 n. ; on the episcopate 
 144; (pseudo-) i6n., i88n., 377 n. 
 
 Athenagoras 182. 
 
 Athens 121. 
 
 Augustin (St.): on the Church 12 n., 
 15 n., 17 n., 24 n., 39, 53 n., 153 n. ; on 
 lay-priesthood 82 n.; on ordination 86, 
 168 n., 175 n., 177-8, 347 n., 353n. ; on 
 councils 155 n., 163 n. ; on Peter's see 
 156 n., 157 n., 158 n. 
 
 Authority 88-98 ; Roman idea of 53-6.
 
 Index 
 
 387 
 
 ojTo<rroAo 213 n., 234 n. 
 a.p\i.<nivd.yiay<K 363-4. 
 
 BACCHYLLUS 121. 
 
 Baptism, 72, 169 ; Jewish 36 n. ; infant 
 
 377 n.; lay 183. 
 Barnabas (St.) 235-7, 239, 361. 
 Barnabas, Ep. ofj2n., 375. 
 Basil (St.) 103, 146 n., i63n., 175, 179 n., 
 
 353- 
 
 Baur(C. F.)224n., 229 n., 3690. 
 Bede(Ven.)47n. 
 Bernaldus Constantiensis 348. 
 Bernard (St.) 89 n., 150 n. 
 Bigg (Dr.) 23 n., 24 n., 71 n., 81 n., 123 n. 
 
 144 n., i88n., 326 n., 329-30. 
 Bilson (Bp.) 66 n. 
 Bingham 92 n., 94 n., 950., 169 n., 176 n., 
 
 336 n., 339-46. 
 Bishops, election of 329 ; exclusive 
 
 powers 159, 167 n., 307-8; indepen- 
 
 dence of 155 ; ordination of 132-3, 
 
 I 37-8, 332-3, 336-7 ; travelling 299 ; 
 
 use of the term 231 ; an ordo 105 n. , 
 
 164 n. (See iri<r<e<nrot.) 
 Boissier (M.) 27-31. 
 Bonwetsch (Prof.) 189 n., 194 n., 355-9 n., 
 
 360 n. 
 Brightman(F. E. B.)i3i n., 1320., 2o8n., 
 
 33 in - 
 
 Butler (Bp.) ion., 101. 
 Butler (Dom) 330. 
 
 CAESAREA, succession at 117. 
 
 Callistus 173. 
 
 Canonical orders 176 f. 
 
 Cassian 340-1. 
 
 Catholicism 51-3. 
 
 Celtic Church 66, 102-3, I 5- 
 
 Chances of valid succession 98-9. 
 
 Character 105, 162 n., 172 f. 
 
 Chilling-worth 98. 
 
 Chorepiscopi 339-40. 
 
 Christian, meaning of 42 n. 
 
 Chrysostom (St.) 377 n. ; on ordination 
 95, 146-7, 350; on the orders 136, 
 161 n., 220, 242 n. ; (pseudo-) 364. 
 
 Church (Dean) 8-9, 33 n., 39 n. 
 
 Church, beginning in a ministry 213-18 
 conceptions of 11-27, 63 n., 152-4; 
 exclusiveness of 14-17, 22, 24', 40-1, 
 44-7 ; prerogative of 41 n. ; unity of 
 152-6; visible 8-53, 17 n., 380., 44 n.; 
 width of 16-7, 25 n., 40-1, 46-7. 
 
 Church Ordinances. See Egyptian Ch 
 
 Ord. 
 Civil customs, influence of 169-72. (See 
 
 Terminology.) 
 
 Clement of Alexandria : on the Church 
 i8n., 22-3, 2 S n M Eucharist 71 n., i88n.; 
 ministry 122-3, M3, 3?m. ; traditions 
 in 92 n., 214 n., 228 n., 238 n., 239 n., 
 25011., 262, 294 n. ; 375 n. 
 Clement of Rome 280; bp. 112, 114, 
 294, 299, 300 n. ; his letter 280 f. ; on 
 the Church 20, 39 n. ; Eucharist 207 n. ; 
 priesthood 180, i83n., 186-7; ministry 
 28o-95> 355 1 9 1 . "on., 173, 213 n., 
 241 n., 257 n., 286 n., 365, 367-8. 
 Clement (pseudo-) 19 n., 260 n. 
 Clementines ; The: date 117 n. ; St. Peter 
 appoints bps. 117; St. James in n8n., 
 2son., 251 n.; on the ministry n6n., 
 u8n., 172 n., 175, iSsn., 201 n., 260 n., 
 276, 294 n., 349, 354, 366. 
 Collegia 27-32, 47-8. 
 Colluthus 126, 147, 197. 
 Confession 132, 1430., 167^, 232 n., 3770. 
 Confessors 134-7. 
 Confirmation 160, 163 n., 167 n., 185 n., 
 
 235-6, 243. 
 
 Congregationalism 313. 
 Corinth 114, 115, 120, 216-8, 282 f., 304. 
 Cornelius (of Rome) 342, 350. 
 Correspondence (with grace) 73-4. 
 Council, second apostolic 251 n. 
 Councils 140-1 : 
 Alexandria [A.D. 324] 126, 141, 147. 
 Ancyra 140-1, 338. 
 Antioch 176 n., 339. 
 Aries [A.D. 314] 163, 177. 
 Capua [A.D. 391] i74n. 
 Carthage [A.D. 256] 162 ; [A.D. 390] 
 
 163 n. 
 Canons of iv Carthagt 16411., 171 n., 
 
 336 n. 
 
 Chalcedon i;6n. 
 Constantinople i76n. 
 Elvira 103, 163, 185 n. 
 Florence 61 n. 
 Neo-Caesarea 141 n., 339 n. 
 Nicaea 141-2, 174 n., 177 n., 185-6, 341. 
 Orleans [A.D. 511] 177 n. 
 Saragossa [A.D. 592] 177 n. 
 Sardica 175 n., 176 n. 
 Seville [A.D. 619] 167 n. 
 Toledo [A.D. 400] 163 n.; [A.D. 633] 
 175 n.
 
 388 
 
 Index 
 
 Councils, authority of, over bishops 
 iSS- 
 
 Crete, succession at 122. 
 
 Cunningham (Dr.) 12 n. 
 
 Cyprian (St.) 136, 185 n., 205 n. : on the 
 Church 14-5, 48, 50, 53 n. ; tradition 
 61-3; ministry 92, 95, 143 n., 151-6, 
 162-3, I 7S n -> '83; ordination 341, 342, 
 350-i 354. 
 
 Xa'picr/xa 218, 226 n., 228-9, 2 9- 
 
 Xi.p60e<ri, \tipoTovia. 148 n., 235 n., 275 n. , 
 35. 352- 
 
 DALE (R. W.) 321. 
 
 D.alman 37 n. 
 
 Damasus 157. 
 
 Darwin (C.) 312. 
 
 De aleatorifrus 350, 354. 
 
 Deacons, 242, 245, 368 ; functions of 133, 
 
 141-2, 161, 163 n., 220-1, 224-5, 3 2 9 n -> 
 
 366, 371 n. 
 
 Deaconesses 218 n., 23on., 245. 
 Delisle 334-7. 
 Demetrius 122, 128, 326-9. 
 Denton 64 n., 85 n., loon. 
 Deposition 172-80, 291. 
 Didache i88n., 21411.: date, etc. 253, 
 
 374-82; on the Church 26 n., 39 n. ; 
 
 Eucharist 72 n., 207 n., 286 n. ; ministry 
 
 92 n., 2oin., 239 n., 241 n., 253-61, 278, 
 
 284 n., 293, 309, 368, 372 ; priesthood 
 
 i8in., 183 n. ; confession 132 n., 232 n. ; 
 
 prophets 220 n., 361-2. 
 Didymus 22, 54, 126 n., 210 n., 355-8. 
 Dio Cassius 171 n. 
 Dioceses, extent of 94. 
 Diognttum Ej>. ad. 25 n., 69 n., Son., 
 
 254 n. 
 
 Dionysius (of Alexandria) 125, 127 n. 
 Dionysius the Areopagite 121, 225 n. ; 
 
 (pseudo-) 131, 138 n., 279, 332 n., 
 
 353". 
 Dionysius of Corinth 120 n., 121, 122, 
 
 225 n., 279, 280 n. 
 Dionysius Exiguus 339. 
 Dionysius of Halicarnassus 366. 
 Diotrephes 233. 
 Discipline, decay of 163 n. 
 Donatists 176 n., 177-8. 
 Dracontius 144, 354. 
 Duchesne (L.) 132 n. 
 SioKovia 147 n., 221 n., 225 n., 227 n., 
 
 234 n. 
 &MKOVOI 220, 367-8 n., 371 n. 
 
 EAST, witness of 148-9. 
 
 Ecce Homo 33. 
 
 Edersheim 36 n., 205 n. 
 
 Egyptian C/t. Ordinances 92 n., 95 n., 
 
 131, 137 n., 257 n., a6on., 27711., 286 n., 
 
 329-30, 352, 375. 
 ' Elders, The ' 107. 
 Election of ministers 91-94, 103-4, 129 n., 
 
 137 n., 257 n., 308, 329, 332, 336 n. 
 Eleutherus 107, 112, 116. 
 End of religion 322. 
 Enoch, Book ofign. 
 Epaphroditus 213 n. 
 Ephesians 44 n., 230 n. 
 Ephraem Syrus sn., 148 n., 276 n., 332 n. 
 Epiphanius (St.): on Alexandria 125, 
 
 152 n., 325 ; the episcopate 147-8, 355-7, 
 
 364-5- 
 
 Episcopate, development of 304-5. 
 Epistles of St. Paul, genuineness 2-4, 
 
 213 n., 229 n., 370-3. 
 Erastianism 96-8, 103, 317. 
 Essentials 322-4. 
 Estcourt 62 n., 99. 
 Eucharist, The 37, 64-5, 70-72, 77-80, 
 
 84, 133, 137-40, 141, 169, 171, 182, 185, 
 
 197, 207, 255, 267, 286, 289 n., 335, 373, 
 
 377-8 ; sacrifice 207 n. 
 Eugenius iv 61 n. 
 Eusebius 107 n., 115, 116, 118, 119 n., 
 
 120 n., 121, 122, 149 n., 196 n., 221 n., 
 
 223 n., 252 n., 292 n., 299 n., 326 n., 
 
 356, 361 ; on apost. council 251 n. ; 
 
 evangelists 259. 
 Eutychius 326-9. 
 Evangelists 244, 254-6, 259. 
 Evidence, deficiency in Scriptural 
 
 246-7. 
 
 Evolution in religion 6-8 ; in state- 
 ment, 196-7, 312. 
 cKKAT)crt'a 31 n., 32 n., 169. 
 ejri'tr/coffos 147 n., 220, 232 n., 234 n., 
 
 274 n., 305 n., 366-7, 368, 370, 373 n. 
 ^youjuei/oi 231 n., 252 n., 292 n., 301 n. 
 
 FABIAN OF ANTIOCH 350. 
 
 Faith, universal faculty 45. 
 
 Felicissimus 342. 
 
 Feudalism and the Church 61, 88-9, 
 
 96-8. 
 
 Field (Dr. F.) 37 n. 
 Finality of the Incarnation 6; of the 
 
 Church 58. 
 Firmilian (St.) 109 n., 143 n., 153 n.
 
 Inaex 
 
 389 
 
 Foncart (M.) 29 n., 31 n. 
 
 GAIUS OF THESSALONICA in n., 225 n., 
 299 n. 
 
 Gaul 106-7, M9i 2 99- 
 
 Genuineness of N. T. records 2-6. 
 
 Gieseler 341, 348. 
 
 Gifts (charismata) 186, 218, *a6 n., 
 228-9, 2 3! n., 290, 371. 
 
 Gladstone (W. E.) 66 n., 70 n., 73, 99, 
 105-6, 212 n. 
 
 Godet (Prof.) 5 n., 6, 201 n., 203 n., 
 210 n. 
 
 Gospels and the Ministry 201-12 ; wit- 
 ness to visible Church, 32-41. 
 
 Government 290, 307-9. 
 
 Greece, succession in, 120-1. 
 
 Gregory of Cappadocia 93. 
 
 Gregory the Great 146 n. 
 
 Gregory Nazianzen 129 n., 145-6, 353. 
 
 Gregory of Nyssa 103, 146 n., 381 n. 
 
 Gregory of Tours 103, 341. 
 
 Guilds (Roman, etc.) 27-32, 47-8. 
 
 HADDAN 94 n. 
 
 Hadrian 25 n., 121, 124. 
 
 Harnack (Prof.) 329, 355-6, 358, 365, 
 366, 370, 372, 374 n., 381 n.: on N. T. 
 documents 3 n., 5 n., 213 n. ; the 
 Church 25, 50, 51 n. ; ministry 80 n., 
 152 n., 171 n., 173 n., 250 n., 260 n., 
 292 n., 369-73 ; Eucharist 207 n., 
 286 n., 289 n. ; Ignatius 265 n., 273 n. 
 
 Hatch (Dr.) 6 n., 32 n., 95 n., 96 n. ; on 
 the Church 8 n., 12, 28, 44 n., 
 47-9 ; ministry 58-9, 152 n., 200 n. ; 
 ordination 169, 170, 174 n., 175 n., 
 334, 339, 340-3, 350-3, 369-73 I bap- 
 tism 8 n., 36 n. ; Montanism 190 n. 
 
 Headlam (A. C.) 4 n., 132 n., 135, 174 n. 
 
 Healing powers in priesthood 133. 
 
 Hebrews, Ep. to the, witness as to 
 church rulers 230-1, 292. 
 
 Hefele 140, 174 n., 175 n. 
 
 Hegesippus 115-17, 238 n. ; 250-2, 260 n., 
 279, 295. 
 
 Heraclas 125, 127-8, 325, 328. 
 
 Heretical sacraments 178. 
 
 Hennas, The Shepherd of : its date 
 300 ; on the Church 14 n., 18-20, 49, 
 52 n. ; ministry 280, 285 n., '292 n., 
 294 n., 300-2 ; prophecy 72 n., 260, 
 361-2. 
 
 Hilary the deacon 157 n., 185. 
 
 Hippolytusi52n. ,183,1910., 260 n., 354-5. 
 Jfifpolytus, Canons of 92 n. ; 131-8, 
 
 161 n., 171 n., 181 n., 350, 352, 377 n., 
 
 382. 
 
 Hoadley (Bp.) 44 n. 
 Holland (H. S.) 33 n., 35 n., 40 n., 204. 
 Holtzmann (Dr.) 224 n., 229 n., 235 n. 
 Hooker 10 n., 281, 318 n. 
 Hort (F. J. A.) 31 n., 32 n., 35 n., 44 n., 
 
 225 n., 226 n., 381, 382-5. 
 Hugh of St. Victor 78 n. 
 Hymenaeus and Alexander 216. 
 Hypothesis, value of 59-60, 312. 
 
 IDEAS, embodiment of 9-10. 
 Ignatius (St.) 118-9, '64-7, 297-9 ' * 
 prophet 257, 260, 273 n. ; his letters 
 265 n. ; on the Church 21, 49, 52 ; 
 Eucharist 71 n., 186-7, 268 n. ; priest- 
 hood 183-4, 186-7 > ministry and epis- 
 copate 135, 251 n., 263, 264-77, 297, 
 365 n., 370 n., 373. 
 
 Imperialism in the Church 96-7. 
 
 Incarnation 6, 58, 268. 
 
 Innocent 166 n. 
 
 Inscriptions 174 n., 364, 366. 
 
 Instruments, tradition of 61-2, 171 n. 
 
 ' Invisible Church ' 17 n., 38 n., 44 n. 
 
 Irenaeus (St.) 106-7, J 49 i on tne Church 
 14 n., 15-16, 18, 48, 50, 53 n., 69 ; Eucha- 
 rist 65, 71 n., 207 n. ; priesthood 80-1, 
 82 n., 1 80 ; episcopal successions 
 106-13, 260, 263, 2 79> 295 ministry 
 223 n., 242 n., 251 n., 260 n., 355 ; 
 prophecy 260, 357, 361. 
 
 Irish Episcopacy 103, 150, 261 n. 
 
 Ischyras 126. 
 
 Isidore of Pelusium 88. 
 
 Isidore of Seville 103 ; on priesthood 
 82 n. ; bishops and presbyters, 166 n., 
 347 ; chorepiscopi 339 ; other orders 
 142 n., 164 n., 260 n. ; ordination 351. 
 
 Ivo of Carnot 142 n. 
 
 JAMBS (ST.) bp. of Jerusalem 116, 
 117 n., 238, 244, 250-2, 278; in the 
 Clementines 118 n., 251 ; on 'presby- 
 ters' 231-2. 
 
 Jerome(St )s7 a , 158, 280 ; on the Church 
 J 7 n -> '53 n - ' priesthood 76, 82 n., 
 185 ; episcopate 156 n ; and presby- 
 terate 201 n., 136; ordination 177, 
 35O-3 > episcopate at Alexandria 124-9, 
 308, 325-8 ; original identity of bishops
 
 390 
 
 Index 
 
 and presbyters 158-62, 251 n., 280 n., 
 346-7- < 
 
 Jerusalem, Church of 116. 
 
 Jevons (F. B.) 29 n., 31 n. 
 
 Jewish Church, continuity with 286 n. 
 
 John (St.) 106 ; 'presbyter' 223 n., 262 n.; 
 priest 260 n., 262 ; prophet 360; insti- 
 tutes episcopacy 114, 228 n., 232-3, 
 261-3. 
 
 John the presbyter 264. 
 
 Josephus 30 n., 250 n., 364. 
 
 Joshua 79, 127 n., 157, 172 n. 
 
 Judas Barsabbas 239 n., 292. 
 
 Jude (St.) his epistle 231 n. ; his descen- 
 dants, 252, 292. 
 
 Julius (Pope) 93. 
 
 Junias 213 n., 254 n. 
 
 Justin Martyr : on the Church 16, 26 ; 
 Eucharist 71 n., 169, 182, 207 n., 373 ; 
 priesthood 79-80, 260 n. ; prophecy 
 357, 3 fil - 
 
 KUEHL, 224 n., 225 n., 229 n., 257 n., 
 273 n., 288 n., 364 n. 
 
 LAITY 95, 97-8, 129 n., 341 ; priesthood 
 of 76-85 ; the Eucharist 188-9 \ bap- 
 tizing and teaching 185. 
 
 Langen(Dr.) 112 n., 158 n., 291 n., 303, 
 321-2. 
 
 Laurentius Mellifluus 83. 
 
 Lausiaca, Historia 339-341. 
 
 Law (W.) 17 n., 33 n., 38 n., 44 n., 
 90 n. 
 
 Laying -on of hands 170-2, 257-8, 
 349-55- 
 
 Legislation, gift of 237. 
 
 Leo (St.) 54, 146 n. ; on lay-priesthood 
 8 1 n. : ordination 93-4, 179. 
 
 Levitical priesthood 65, 79 n., 81, 143, 
 I 45, J 54 "., I 65i 172 n-i 182, 283, 344 n., 
 363. 
 
 Liberatus 129 n. 
 
 Liberty and sacerdotalism 88-98. 
 
 Liddon (Dr.) 74 n., 75 n., 76, 276 n. 
 
 Lightfoot (Dr.) 4 n., 21 n., 30 n., 71 n., 
 117 n., 119 n., 281 n., 365 ; deacons 
 242 n. ; Ignatian letters 265 ; can. xiii 
 of Ancyra 338 ; sacerdotalism 65 n., 
 76, 81, 181 n., 277 n. ; the ministry 
 321-5: history of episcopate 116, 122, 
 126 n., 152 n., 225 n., 226 n., 233 n., 
 *So n., 251 n., 262 n., 263-5, 2 ^7 n., 
 
 2 73> 279-80, 284 n., 291 n., 294 n., 
 
 295 n., 299 n., 340. 
 Linus 279, 295. 
 Liudger (St.) 342-3. 
 Lucian 32 n., 364. 
 Lucifer of Cagliari 156-7, 178 n., 351, 
 
 354- 
 Lux Mundi 87 n. 
 
 MACAULAY (Lord) 98. 
 
 Macedonia, succession in 121. 
 
 Mahommed 58 n. 
 
 Makrizi (El) 119 n., 328 n. 
 
 Marcion 120 n., 122. 
 
 Mark (St.) 122, 125, 325-6, 328. 
 
 Martyrium Polycarpi 14 n., 379 n. 
 
 Mason (Dr. A. J.) 53 n., 82 n., 92 n., 
 
 177 n., 185 n. 
 Matthias (St.) 13, 123 n. 
 Maurice (F. D.) (33 n., 70 n., 76 n., 
 
 202. 
 
 Mazzini 90. 
 
 Means and ends 101 n., 322-4. 
 Meletian schismatic bishops 152 n. 
 Meletius 152 n., 177 n. 
 Melito 25 n., 120. 
 Messiahship, witness to visible Church 
 
 37- 
 Middle Ages 51, 61, 77, 81, 88, 90, 
 
 102-3, I2 9, 34 2 - 
 Milligan (Prof.) 41 n., 47 n., 233 n., 
 
 3I4-5- 
 Ministry, conceptions of 166 ; Clem. 
 
 Alex. 122 n. ; Clementines 118 n. ; 
 
 Origen 127 n. ; constitutional 95, 155 ; 
 
 elective 64, 91-4 ; exclusive 184 f. ; 
 
 mediatorial 78 n. ; not vicarious 76-8 ; 
 
 permanent elements of 104-5 P er - 
 
 verted ideas of 60-1 ; representative 
 
 ^4-5) 77-8, 91-4 ; variable 102-4 > 
 
 ministerial 84-5, 184 n. 
 Minor Orders 171 n. 
 Minucius Felix 27. 
 Moberly (Dr.) 184 n. 
 Mohler 63 n. 
 
 Monepiscopacy 66, 129-30, 161-2, 303. 
 Montanism 107, 123 n., 188-196, 199, 
 
 355-9, 361. 
 
 Montefiore (Mr.) 79 n. 
 Morin (Dom) 158 n., 288 n. 
 Morinus : de Sacr. Ord. 61 n. ; ' tra- 
 
 ditio instrumentorum ' 62 n., 171 n. ; 
 
 on orders 105 n. ; St. Jerome 158 n., 
 
 161 n., 162 n. ; valid ordination 175 n.,
 
 Index 
 
 391 
 
 176, 179-80; rites 332-7; chorepiscopi 
 
 339-40. 
 
 Moses 138, 287. 
 Muratorian Canon 263, 264 n., 300 n., 
 
 357- 
 
 NARCISSUS 117. 
 Necessitas medii 101 n. 
 Newman (J. H.) 101 n., 353. 
 Non-episcopal bodies 100-1, 313-6. 
 Novation schism 50 n., 96 n., 152 n., 
 
 i77n., 197, 342, 350. 
 Novatus 342. 
 
 OECUMENIUS 242 n. 
 
 Optatus of Milevis 156 n. 
 
 Orders, indelible 105, 187 f. : number 
 of 105 n., 348 : official 223 ; sacra- 
 mental 105, 168-70. 
 
 Ordination 236 ; idea of 228-9, 2 45-6 : 
 matter of 61-2 n., 105, 349-52 ; rites 
 of 131-8, 163-6, 331-7. 
 
 Ordo Romattus 146 n., 167 n., 336. 
 
 Origen 122, 205 n., 226 n., 227 n., 232 n., 
 2 33 n -i 327-9, 349 ! on the Church 17 n., 
 22 n., 24-5, 26 n. ; ministry 127-9 i 
 priesthood 82 n., 143, 180, 183; pro- 
 phecy 357, 361 ; Shephtrd of Hermas 
 300 n. ; traditions in 121 n., 225 n., 
 251 n., 266 n., 299 n. 
 
 PACIAN 225 n. 
 
 Palestine, succession in 116-8. 
 
 Pamphilus 328. 
 
 Paphnutius 340-2, 
 
 Papias 107 n., 119, 223 n. 
 
 Paschal controversy 107, 117, 120-1. 
 
 Paschasius Radbert 82 n., 87 n. 
 
 Pastoral epistles 221-9. ; genuineness 3-4, 
 229 n. 
 
 Patristic sacramentalism 71 n. 
 
 Paul (St.) 235, 236 n., 239 : witness of his 
 epp. as to the Church 42-6 ; ministry 
 313-30; ordination 245-6; a prophet 
 220 n., 360. 
 
 Paulianist clergy 177 n. 
 
 Pearson (Bp.) 63 n., 265 n., 327. 
 
 People, relation of, to ministry 64-5. 
 
 Peter (St.) 114, 175 ; commission to 5 n., 
 193, 204-7, 2II > 'presbyter' 274 n., 
 305 ; prophet 360 ; at Antioch 279 ; in 
 Clementines 117 ; his primacy 154, 
 156, 205-7 evidence of his ep! on the 
 ministry 231 n., 232. 
 
 Pfleiderer (Prof.) 4 n., 20 n., 44 n., 45. 
 
 Philip (St.) in Asia Minor, 264. 
 Philip the Evangelist 220 n., 242. 
 Philo 360 n. 
 Phoebe 219 n., 230 n. 
 Photius 328. 
 Pirqe Abotk 206 n. 
 Pius 300 n., 302. 
 Plato 360 n. 
 Pliny 30. 
 
 Polycarp, bp. of Smyrna 18, 106, no n., 
 114, 119, 278, 296; prophet 257, 260, 
 
 298 ; his letter 296-9, 277 n., 284 n., 
 
 303, 368, 371 n. 
 Polycrates 120, 181 n., 260 n., 262, 
 
 264 n. 
 Pontus 120. 
 Potter (Abp.) 99-100. 
 Prayer, freedom of 256, 260 n., 294 n. 
 Preaching 161 n. 
 Presbyterate 223, 231-2, 240-1, 244, 
 
 276-7, 296-7, 300, 304, 363-6, 360-71 ; 
 
 asserted powers of ordination 340-3 ; 
 
 in church councils 155; functions of 
 
 163 n., 166 n., 232 ; growth of indepen- 
 
 dent power 166 ; ordination to 134-8, 
 
 331-5 ; subordination of 135, 161. 
 Presbyter-bishops 220-1, 223-4, ^'i 
 
 244-5, 291-3, 304, 305 n., 308, 310, 
 
 325-9. 344-8- 
 Presidents (trpourraittpot) 217, 221, 
 
 231. 
 Priesthood of Christ 84 n., 139, 143 ; of 
 
 all churchmen 76-85 (and notes). 
 Primus 115, 120. 
 Priscillian 15 n., 93. 
 Prophetic appointment 228, 240. 
 Prophets 220 n., 238-9, 244, 254-8, 356-7, 
 
 Puller (Fr.) 156 n. 
 
 Puritanism 358. 
 
 Pusey (Dr.) 40 n. 
 
 iropoiKtai 107 n., 135 n., 299 n., 326 n., 
 
 370 n. 
 
 TroifitVet 22O, 241 n., 245. 
 jrpe<rjSvTtpo 147 n., 223-4, 262 n., 274 n., 
 
 277 n., 284-5 n., 305 n., 363-6, 368. 
 217 n., 221 n. 
 
 QUADRATUS 121, 357, 361. 
 Quaestioncs in N. et V. Test. 158-62, 
 174 n., 346, 354 ; their author 158. 
 
 RABANUS MAURUS : on priesthood 82 n. ; 
 sacraments 168 n. ; orders of the minis-
 
 392 
 
 Index 
 
 try 14211., 16411., 16711., i68n., 26011., 
 339 n., 348. 
 
 Rackhara (R. B.) 94, 338. 
 
 Ramsay (Prof.) 4 n., 28 n., 30 n., 230 n., 
 281 n., 373 n. 
 
 Raymund of Sabunde 306 n. 
 
 Readers 260 n., 329 n. 
 
 Reeves on Irish episcopate 150 n. 
 
 Reformation 313. 
 
 Renan (M.) 51 n., 234, 242 n. 
 
 Renaudot 327-8. 
 
 Reordination 174-80. 
 
 Robertson (F. W.) 72 n. 
 
 Romanism 51, 53-6, 91, 96-7, 343. 
 
 Rome, Church of 18-21, 106-7, IJ 6> 132, 
 157-8, 218, 266, 274, 280-1, 284, 294, 
 300, 342; Epistle to 218-19; succession 
 at ii2, 114, 116, 149, 279, 294; bishop 
 of 94, 96, 103, 152 n., 156, 191-2, 205 n., 
 294 n., 343 ; Jews at 364. 
 
 Rosmini 96 n. 
 
 Rothe 16 n., 17 n., 19 n., 23 n., 251. 
 
 Rufinus 15 n., 374-5 n. 
 
 SABATIER (M.) 36 n., 234 n., 377 n., 
 
 380. 
 Sacerdotalism 75-86, 145-6, 159, 180-5, 
 
 277 n., 306-7, 324-5. 
 Sacraments, principle of 64-5, 70-73, 
 
 84-5 ; Fathers on 71 n. ; witness to 
 
 visible Church 36-7. 
 Salmon (Dr.) 117 n., 152 n., 194 n., 199, 
 
 253 n., 294 n., 300 n., 304 n., 367 n., 
 
 375 " 
 Sanday (Dr.) 5 n., 7 n., 47 n., 184 n., 
 
 194 n., 366 n., 367 n., 371 n., 384 n. 
 Schism, moral idea of 68, 113, 153; 
 
 responsibility for 100, 152 n., 153 n., 
 
 314-6 ; witness of 49. 
 Scythia 299 n. 
 
 Serapion (of Antioch) 118, 119 n. 
 Serapion (of Thmuis) 131, 138, 331-2, 
 
 350, 381-2. 
 Seven, the 241-2. 
 
 Seventy, the 119 n., 201, 214 n., 259. 
 Severus of Asmonaei 327. 
 Shirley (Prof.) 226 n. 
 Silas 239 n., 292. 
 Simcox(W. H.)42n., 130 n., 182, 225 n., 
 
 233 n., 250 n., 262 n. 
 Society, principle of 46-7. 
 Socrates 96, 177 n., 341. 
 Soter 112, 1 1 6. 
 Sozomen 299 n. 
 
 Stanley (A. P.) 104 n. 
 
 Stanton (Prof. V. H.) 17 n., 33 n., 37 n., 
 
 38 n., 49, 312. 
 Stephanas 219 n. 
 Stephen I. (Pope) 55, 86, 143 n., 
 
 1531. 
 
 Sub-apostolic office 260 f., 266. 
 Successions, evidence of 112-22, 149, 
 
 250-2, 262-4, 278-80, 290, 295 ; see 
 
 Apostolic succession. 
 Supernaturalism 8. 
 Symeon, bp. of Jerusalem 116, 252-3. 
 Symeon of Thessalonica 131, 138 n. 
 Synesius 351. 
 Syria 299. 
 Syrian church 118, 259. 
 
 TARASIS 174 n. 
 
 Tatian 5 n. 
 
 Taylor (Jeremy) 74. 
 
 Taylor (Dr.) 36 n., 206 n., 255 n., 374, 
 375 n., 381. 
 
 Teaching of the Apostles (Syriac) 119 n., 
 201 n. 
 
 Terminology of orders 363-73, 147 n., 
 181-2, 274, 305 n. 
 
 Tertullian : on the Church 12-4, 18 n., 
 26 n., 31 n., 53 n., 120 n. ; sacraments 
 71 n., 164-5, '69 > episcopal successions 
 108, 113-15, 121, 149, 263; priesthood 
 Son., 180, 185 n., 186 n., 188-90; his 
 Montanist views 189-95, 355-9- 
 
 Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs 
 365- 
 
 Thaddaeus 119 n. 
 
 Theodore of Mopsuestia 148 n., 305 n., 
 368. 
 
 Theodoret 174 n., 214 n., 305 n., 349 n., 
 353- 
 
 Theophilus of Antioch 26, 118. 
 
 Theophylact 206 n., 220 n. 
 
 Thomas Aquinas (St.) 82 n., 343. 
 
 Thrace, succession in 121-2. 
 
 Timothy (and Titus) 225-7, Z 39> Z44i 
 263 n., 293, 349, 360. 
 
 Tixeront (M.) 107 n., 119 n. 
 
 Todd on Irish bps. 150 n., 151. 
 
 Tradition, fallibility of 107. 
 
 Trent, Catechism ofio$ n. 
 
 Two Ways, The 374. 
 
 'UNCHURCHING' 100-1, 313-4. 
 Uncovenanted grace 101, 313. 
 Unction 167 n., 232 n.
 
 Index 
 
 393 
 
 Unity, claims of 314-5. 
 Unworthiness of minister 86-8, 144 n. 
 
 VALENS (of Philippi) 297 n. 
 
 Validity 76-80, 186. 
 
 Vicarious priesthood 76-8. 
 
 Victor i. (Pope) 18, 54-5, 107, no n. 
 
 294 n., 3ss n. 
 Victorinus, Marias 22. 
 Victorinus of Petau 81 n., 233 n. 
 Vincent of Lerins 53 n. 
 
 Vitringa 32 n. 
 
 WALAFRID STRABO 82 n. 
 
 Weizsacker 229 n. 
 
 Westcott (Dr.) 5 n., 70., 15 n. 
 
 210 n., 381. 
 Willehad (St.) 342-3. 
 Winterstein 221 n., 297 n. 
 Women, ministry of 230 n., 245. 
 Wordsworth (Bp. J.) 131 n. 
 
 ZAUN (Prof.) 5 n., 265 n., 273 n. 
 
 Printed by T. and A. CONSTABLE, Printeri to Her Majesty 
 at the Edinburgh University Preis
 
 September 1900. 
 
 A Selection of Works 
 
 IN 
 
 THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE 
 
 PUBLISHED BY 
 
 MESSRS. LONGMANS, GREEN, & CO. 
 
 London : 39 PATERNOSTER Row, E.G. 
 
 New York : 91 and 93 FIFTH AVENUE. 
 
 Bombay : 32 HORNBY ROAD. 
 
 Abbey and Overton. THE ENGLISH CHURCH IN THE 
 EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. By CHARLES J. ABBEY, M.A. , Rector 
 of Checkendon, Reading, and JOHN H. OVERTON, D.D., Canon of 
 Lincoln. Crown 8vo. js. 6d, 
 
 Adams. SACRED ALLEGORIES. The Shadow of the Cross 
 
 The Distant Hills The Old Man's Home The King's Messengers. 
 By the Rev. WILLIAM ADAMS, M.A. i6mo. y. 6d. 
 
 The four Allegories may be had separately, with Illustrations. 
 \6rno. is, each. 
 
 Advent Sermons on Church Reform. By Various Preachers. 
 With a Preface by the LORD BISHOP OF STEPNEY. Crown 8vo. 
 
 2S. 6J. 
 
 Aids to the Inner Life. 
 
 Edited by the Venble. W. H. HUTCHINGS, M.A., Archdeacon of Cleve- 
 land, Canon of York, Rector of Kirby Misperton, and Rural Dean of 
 Malton. Five Vols. yzmo, cloth limp, 6d. each; or cloth extra, 
 is, each. 
 
 OF THE IMITATION OF CHRIST. By THOMAS X KEMPIS. 
 
 THE CHRISTIAN YEAR. 
 
 THE DEVOUT LIFE. By ST. FRANCIS DE SALES. 
 
 THE HIDDEN LIFE OF THE SOUL. 
 
 THE SPIRITUAL COMBAT. By LAURENCE SCOPOLI. 
 
 Alexander. THE CHRISTIANITY OF ST. PAUL. By the 
 Rev. S. A. ALEXANDER, M.A., Reader of the Temple Church. Crown 
 8vo. 41. 6d. 
 
 Arbuthnot. SHAKESPEARE SERMONS. Preached in the 
 
 Collegiate Church of Stratford-on-Avon on the Sundays following the 
 Poet's Birthday, 1894-1900. Collected by the Rev. GEORGE ARBUTH- 
 NOT, M.A., Vicar of Stratford-on-Avon. Crown Svo. 
 
 SERMON I. (St. Matt. x. 41). Preached April 22, 1894, by the Rev. R. S. DE C 
 LAFFAN, M. A., Head Master of King Edward VI. School, Stratford-on-Avon ; now 
 Rector of St. Mary Woolnoth, London. SERMON II. ( >. Preached 
 
 April , 1895, by the Rev. G. F. BROWNE, D.D., Canon of St. Paul's; now Lord 
 Bishop of Bristol. SERMON III. (Num. xxii. 38). Preached April 26, 1896, by the 
 Rev. ALFRED AJNGER M. A. , Master of the Temple, and Canon of Bristol. - SERMON 
 
 [continued.
 
 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Arbuthnot. SHAKESPEARE SERMONS continued. 
 
 IV. (St. James, i. 17). Preached April 25, 1897, by the Rev. A. NICHOLSON, D.D., 
 Vicar of St. Alban's, Leamington. SERMON V. (i Thess. iii. 9). Preached April 23, 
 1899, by the Very Rev. C. W. STUBBS, D.D., Dean of Ely. SEKMON VI. (Num. 
 xxiii. 16). Preached April 23, 1899, by the Rev. GEORGE ARBUTHNOT, M.A., Vicar 
 of Stratford-on-Avon. SERMON VII. (Eccles. xliv. 14). Preached April 29, 1900, 
 by the Very Rev. F. W. FARRAR, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. SERMON VIII. (Rev. 
 xv. 3). Preached April 29, 1900, by the Rev. GEORGE ARBUTHNOT, M.A., Vicar of 
 Stratford-on-Avon. 
 
 Bathe. Works by the Rev. ANTHONY BATHE, M.A. 
 
 A LENT WITH JESUS. A Plain Guide for Churchmen. Containing 
 
 Readings for Lent and Easter Week, and on the Holy Eucharist. 
 
 yzmo, is. ; or in paper cover, 6d. 
 
 AN ADVENT WITH JEbUS. ytmo, is., or in paper covered. 
 WHAT I SHOULD BELIEVE. A Simple Manual of Self-Instruction 
 
 for Church People. Small 8v0, limp, is. ; cloth gilt, zs. 
 
 Bathe and Buckham. THE CHRISTIAN'S ROAD BOOK. 
 2 Parts. By the Rev. ANTHONY BATHE and Rev. F. H. BUCKHAM. 
 Part I. DEVOTIONS. Sewed, 6d. ; limp cloth, is. ; cloth extra, is. 6d. 
 Part II. READINGS. Sewed, is. ; limp cloth, zs. ; cloth extra, y. ; 
 or complete in one volume, sewed, is. 6d. limp cloth, zs. 6d. ; cloth 
 extra, -y. 6d. 
 
 Benson. Works by the Rev. R. M. BENSON, M.A., Student of 
 Christ Church, Oxford. 
 
 THE FOLLOWERS OF THE LAMB : a Series of Meditations, especially 
 intended for Persons living under Religious Vows, and for Seasons of 
 Retreat, etc. Crown 8vo. 4*. 6d. 
 
 THE FINAL PASSOVER : A Series of Meditations upon the Passion of 
 
 our Lord Jesus Christ. Small 8vo. 
 
 Vol. I. THE REJECTION. 5*. I Vol. III. THE DIVINE EXODUS. 
 Vol. II. THE UPPER CHAMBER. | Parts i. and n. 5*. each. 
 
 Parti. y. Vol. IV. THE LIFE BEYOND THE 
 
 Part n. $s. GRAVE. 5*. 
 
 THE MAGNIFICAT; a Series of Meditations upon the Song of the 
 Blessed Virgin Mary. Small 8vo. zs. 
 
 SPIRITUAL READINGS FOR EVERY DAY. 3 vois. Small 8vo. 
 
 y. 6d. each. 
 I. ADVENT. II. CHRISTMAS. III. EPIPHANY. 
 
 BENEDICTUS DOMINUS : A Course of Meditations for Every Day of 
 the Year. Vol. I. ADVENT TO TRINITY. Vol. II. TRINITY, SAINTS' 
 DAYS, etc. Small 8vo. y. 6d. each ; or in One Volume, js. 
 
 BIBLE TEACHINGS : The Discourse at Capernaum. St. John vi. Small 
 8vo. is. ; or with Notes, y. bd. 
 
 THE WISDOM OF THE SON OF DAVID : An Exposition of the First 
 Nine Chapters of the Book of Proverbs. Small 8vo. y. 6d.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 
 
 Benson. Works by the Rev. R. M. BENSON, M.A. continued. 
 
 THE MANUAL OF INTERCESSORY PRAYER. Ryal&mo; cloth 
 boards, is. $d. cloth limp, t)d. 
 
 THE EVANGELIST LIBRARY CATECHISM. Parti. Small 8vo. y. 
 PAROCHIAL MISSIONS. Small 8vo. 2*. 6d. 
 
 Bigg. UNITY IN DIVERSITY : Five Addresses delivered 
 
 in the Cathedral Church of Christ, Oxford, during Lent 1899, with 
 Introduction. By the Rev. CHARLES BIGG, D.D., Rector of Fenny 
 Compton, formerly Senior Student and Tutor of Christ Church. 
 Crown 8vo. ay. 6d, 
 
 Bickersteth. YESTERDAY, TO-DAY, AND FOR EVER: 
 
 a Poem in Twelve Books. By EDWARD HENRY BICKERSTETH, D.D., 
 Lord Bishop of Exeter. One Shilling Edition, i8mo. With red borders, 
 i6mo, zs. 6d. 
 
 The Crovm Svo Edition ($s.) may still It had. 
 
 Blunt. Works by the Rev. JOHN HENRY BLUNT, D.D. 
 
 THE ANNOTATED BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER: Being an 
 Historical, Ritual, and Theological Commentary on the Devotional 
 System of the Church of England. 4/0. zis. 
 
 THE COMPENDIOUS EDITION OF THE ANNOTATED BOOK 
 OF COMMON PRAYER : Forming a concise Commentary on the 
 Devotional System of the Church of England. Crown &vo. IDS. 6</. 
 
 DICTIONARY OF DOCTRINAL AND HISTORICAL THEOLOGY. 
 By various Writers. Imperial 8vo. zis. 
 
 DICTIONARY OF SECTS, HERESIES, ECCLESIASTICAL PAR- 
 TIES AND SCHOOLS OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT. By various 
 Writers. Imperial 8vo. 2is. 
 
 THE REFORMATION OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND: its 
 History, Principles, and Results. 1574-1662. Two Vols. 8vo. 34*. 
 
 THE BOOK OF CHURCH LAW. Being an Exposition of the Legal 
 Rights and Duties of the Parochial Clergy and the Laity of the Church 
 of England. Revised by the Right Hon. Sir WALTER G. F. PHILLI- 
 MORE, Bart., D.C.L., and G. EDWARDES JONES, Barrister-at-Law 
 Crown 8vo. gs. 
 
 A COMPANION TO THE BIBLE : Being a Plain Commentary on 
 Scripture History, to the end of the Apostolic Age. Two Vols. small 
 8vo. Sold separately. OLD TEST. y. 6d. NEW TEST. 3*. 6d. 
 
 HOUSEHOLD THEOLOGY : a Handbook of Religious Information 
 respecting the Holy Bible, the Prayer Book, the Church, etc., etc. 
 Paper cover, i6tno. u. Also the Larger Edition, y. 6d.
 
 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Body. Works by the Rev. GEORGE BoDY,D.D.,Canon of Durham. 
 THE LIFE OF LOVE. A Course of Lent Lectures. i6mo. 2s. 6ei. 
 
 THE SCHOOL OF CALVARY ; or, Laws of Christian Life revealed 
 from the Cross. i6mo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 THE LIFE OF JUSTIFICATION. i6mo. 25. 6d. 
 THE LIFE OF TEMPTATION. i6mo. zs. 6d. 
 
 THE PRESENT STATE OF THE FAITHFUL DEPARTED. Small 
 8vo. sewed, 6d. yzmo. cloth, is. 
 
 Book of Private Prayer, The. For use Twice Daily ; together 
 
 with the Order for the Administration of the Lord's Supper or Holy 
 Communion. Revised and Enlarged Edition. i8mo. Limp cloth, zs. ; 
 Cloth boards, zs. 6d. 
 
 Boultbee. A COMMENTARY ON THE THIRTY-NINE 
 ARTICLES OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. By the Rev. 
 T. P. BOULTBEE, formerly Principal of the London College of Divinity, 
 St. John's Hall, Highbury. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 Bright. Works by WILLIAM BRIGHT, D.D., Regius Professor 
 of Ecclesiastical History in the University of Oxford, 
 and Canon of Christ Church, Oxford. 
 
 THE AGE OF THE FATHERS. Two Vols. 8vo. [In the Press. 
 
 SOME ASPECTS OF PRIMITIVE CHURCH LIFE. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 THE ROMAN SEE IN THE EARLY CHURCH : And other Studies 
 in Church History. Crown 8vo. js. 6d. 
 
 WAYMARKS IN CHURCH HISTORY. Crown 8vo. 75. 6d. 
 
 LESSONS FROM THE LIVES OF THREE GREAT FATHERS. 
 St. Athanasius, St. Chrysostom, and St. Augustine. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 THE INCARNATION AS A MOTIVE POWER. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 Bright and Medd. LIBER PRECUM PUBLICARUM EC- 
 CLESI^E ANGLICANS. A GULIELMO BRIGHT, S.T.P., et PETEO 
 GOLDSMITH MEDD, A.M., Latine redditus. Small Zvo. js. 6d. 
 
 Browne. WEARIED WITH THE BURDEN : A Book of 
 Daily Readings for Lent. By ARTHUR HEBER BROWNE, M.A., 
 LL.D., Vicar of Kempsford, Gloucester. Crown 8vo. 4*. 6d. 
 
 Browne. AN EXPOSITION OF THE THIRTY-NINE 
 ARTICLES, Historical and Doctrinal. By E. H. BROWNE, D.D., 
 sometime Bishop of Winchester. 8vo. i6s. 
 
 Campion and Beamont. THE PRAYER BOOK INTER- 
 LEAVED. With Historical Illustrations and Explanatory Notes 
 arranged parallel to the Text. By W. M. CAMPION, D.D., and W. J. 
 BEAMONT, M.A. Small 8vo. 7*. 6d.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 5 
 
 Carpenter and Harford-Battersby. THE HEXATEUCH 
 
 ACCORDING TO THE REVISED VERSION ARRANGED 
 IN ITS CONSTITUENT DOCUMENTS BY MEMBERS OF 
 THE SOCIETY OF HISTORICAL THEOLOGY, OXFORD. 
 Edited with Introduction, Notes, Marginal References, and Synoptical 
 Tables. By J. ESTLIN CARPENTER, M.A. (Lond.) and G. HARFORD- 
 BATTERSBY, M.A. (Oxon.). Two vols. 4*0. (Vol. I. Introduction and 
 Appendices : Vol. II, Text and Notes). 36*. net. 
 
 Carter. Works by, and edited by the Rev. T. T. CARTER, M.A., 
 Hon. Canon of Christ Church, Oxford. 
 
 UNDERCURRENTS OF CHURCH LIFE IN THE EIGHTEENTH 
 CENTURY. Crown Svo. y. 
 
 NICHOLAS FERRAR : his Household and his Friends. With Portrait. 
 Crown Svo. 6s. 
 
 THE SPIRIT OF WATCHFULNESS AND OTHER SERMONS. 
 Crown Svo. y. 
 
 THE TREASURY OF DEVOTION : a Manual of Prayer for General 
 and Daily Use. Compiled by a Priest. 
 
 iSmo. zs. 6d. ; cloth limp. zs. Bound with the Book of Common 
 Prayer, y. 6d. Red-Line Edition. Cloth extra, frilt top. iSme, 
 2s. 6d. net. Large-Type Edition. Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE WAY OF LIFE : A Book of Prayers and Instruction for the Young 
 at School, with a Preparation for Confirmation. 18010. is. 6d. 
 
 THE PATH OF HOLINESS : a First Book of Prayers, with the Service 
 of the Holy Communion, for the Young. Compiled by a Priest. With 
 Illustrations. i6mo. is. 6d. ; cloth limp, is. 
 
 THE GUIDE TO HEAVEN : a Book of Prayers for every Want. (For 
 the Working Classes.) Compiled by a Priest. iSmo. is. 6d. ; cloth 
 limp, is. Large- Type Edition. Crown Svo. is. 6d. ; cloth limp, is. 
 
 THE STAR OF CHILDHOOD : a First Book of Prayers and Instruction 
 for Children. Compiled by a Priest With Illustrations. i6ma. zs. 6d. 
 
 SIMPLE LESSONS ; or, Words Easy to be Understood. A Manual of 
 Teaching. I. On the Creed, n. The Ten Commandments, in. The 
 Sacrament. iSmo. y. 
 
 MANUAL OF DEVOTION FOR SISTERS OF MERCY. 8 parts in 
 2 vols. 32mo. los. Or separately : Part I. is. 6d. Part n. is. Part 
 in. u. Part iv. zs. PartV. is. Partvi. is. Partvii. Partvin. is. 6d. 
 
 SPIRITUAL INSTRUCTIONS. Crown Svo. 
 
 THE HOLY EUCHARIST, y. 6d. 
 THE DIVINE DISPENSATIONS, y. 
 THE LIFE OF GRACE, y. 6d. 
 
 OUR LORD'S EARLY LIFE. 35. 6<f. 
 OUR LORD'S ENTRANCE ON HIS 
 MINISTRY, y. 6d. 
 
 THE RELIGIOUS LIFE. y. 6d. 
 
 A BOOK OF PRIVATE PRAYER FOR MORNING, MID-DAY, AND 
 OTHER TIMES. iSmo, limp cloth, is. ; cloth, ted edges, is. 3</ 
 
 [continued.
 
 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Carter. Works by, and edited by the Rev. T. T. CARTER, M.A., 
 Hon. Canon of Christ Church, Oxford. continued. 
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF THE PRIESTHOOD IN THE CHURCH 
 OF ENGLAND. Crown 8vo. 4*. 
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF CONFESSION IN THE CHURCH OF 
 ENGLAND. Crown 8vo. $s. 
 
 Coles. Works by the Rev. V. S. S. COLES, M.A., Principal of the 
 
 Pusey House, Oxford. 
 LENTEN MEDITATIONS. iBmo. as'. 6d. 
 
 ADVENT MEDITATIONS ON ISAIAH I.-XII. : together with Out- 
 lines of Christmas Meditations on St. John i. 1-12. itimo. 2s. 
 
 Conybeare and Howson. THE LIFE AND EPISTLES OF 
 
 ST. PAUL. By the Rev. W. J. CONYBEARE, M.A., and the Very 
 
 Rev. J. S. HOWSON, D.D. With numerous Maps and Illustrations. 
 
 LIBRARY EDITION. Two Vols. 8vo. ais. STUDENTS' EDITION. One Vol. 
 
 Crown 8vo. 6s. POPULAR EDITION. One Vol. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 Creighton. A HISTORY OF THE PAPACY FROM THE 
 GREAT SCHISM TO THE SACK OF ROME (1378-1527). By 
 Right Hon. and Right Rev. MANDELL CREIGHTON, D. D., Lord Bishop 
 of London. Six Volumes. Crown 8vo. 6s. each. 
 
 Croft. LESSONS ON CHURCH DOCTRINE, for Secondary 
 Schools. By S. CROFT. With Preface by the LORD BISHOP OF 
 ROCHESTER. (Three Parts.) Parts I. and II. Crown 8vo. Sewed. 
 6d. each. 
 
 Day-Hours of the Church of England, The. Newly Revised 
 
 according to the Prayer Book and the Authorised Translation of the 
 Bible. Crown 8vo, sewed, y. ; cloth, y. 6d. 
 
 SUPPLEMENT TO THE DAY-HOURS OF THE CHURCH OF 
 ENGLAND, being the Service for certain Holy Days. Crown 8vo, 
 sewed, y. ; cloth, y. 6d. 
 
 Devotional Series, 16mo, Red Borders. Each zs. 6ct. 
 
 BICKERSTETH'S YESTERDAY, TO- 
 DAY, AND FOR EVER. 
 
 CHILCOT'S TREATISE ON EVIL 
 THOUGHTS. 
 
 THE CHRISTIAN YEAR. 
 
 HERBERT'S POEMS AND PROVERBS. 
 
 KEMPIS' (A) OF THE IMITATION 
 OF CHRIST. 
 
 LEAR'S (H. L. SIDNEY) FOR DAYS 
 
 AND YEARS. 
 FRANCIS DE SALES' (ST.) THE 
 
 DEVOUT LIFE. 
 WILSON'S THE LORD'S SUPPER. 
 
 Large type. 
 
 "TAYLOR'S ( JEREMY) HOLY LIVING. 
 * HOLY DYING. 
 
 * These two in one Volume. $s.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 
 
 Devotional Series, 18mo, without Red Borders. Each is. 
 
 BICKERSTETH'S YESTERDAY, TO- 
 DAY, AND FOR EVER. 
 
 THE CHRISTIAN YEAR. 
 
 KEMPIS' (A) OF THE IMITATION 
 OF CHRIST. 
 
 HERBERT'S POEMS AND PROVERBS. 
 
 WILSON'S THE LORD'S SUPPER. 
 
 Large type. 
 FRANCIS DE SALES' (ST.) THE 
 
 DEVOUT LIFE. 
 
 TAYLOR'S (JEREMY) HOLY LIVING. 
 * HOLY DYING. 
 
 * These two in one Volume, zs. 6d. 
 
 Edersheim, Works by ALFRED EDERSHEIM, M.A,, D.D., Ph.D. 
 
 THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JESUS THE MESSIAH. Two Vols. 
 
 8vo. I2J. net. 
 
 JESUS THE MESSIAH : being an Abridged Edition of 'The Life and 
 Times of Jesus the Messiah.' Crown 8vo. 6s. net. 
 
 Ellicott. Works by C. J. ELLICOTT, D.D., Bishop of Gloucester 
 
 A CRITICAL AND GRAMMATICAL COMMENTARY ON ST. 
 PAUL'S EPISTLES. Greek Text, with a Critical and Grammatical 
 Commentary, and a Revised English Translation. 8vo. 
 
 GALATIANS. 8s. 6d. 
 EPHESIANS. 8s. 6d. 
 PASTORAL EPISTLES. IQJ. 6d. 
 
 PHILIPPIANS, COLOSSIANS, AND 
 
 PHILEMON. IQJ. 6d. 
 THESSALONIANS. 71. 6d. 
 
 HISTORICAL LECTURES ON THE LIFE OF OUR LORD 
 JESUS CHRIST. 8vo. izs. 
 
 English (The)Catholic's Vade Mecum: a Short Manual of General 
 Devotion. Compiled by a PRIEST, yzmo. limp, is. ; cloth, zs. 
 PRIEST'S Edition, 32010. is. 6d. 
 
 Epochs of Church History. Edited by Right Hon. and Right 
 Rev. MANDELL CREIGHTON, D.D., Lord Bishop of 
 London. Small 8vo. 2s. 6d. each. 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. 
 By the Hon. G. C. BRODRICK, D.C.L. 
 
 THE UNIVERSITY OF CAM- 
 BRIDGE. By J. BASS MULLINGKR, 
 M.A. 
 
 THE ENGLISH CHURCH IN 
 OTHER LANDS. By the Rev. H. W. 
 TUCKER, M.A. 
 
 THE HISTORY OF THE REFOR- 
 MATION IN ENGLAND. By the 
 
 Rev. GEO. G. PBRRY, M.A. wri ICH rHTTKPH TTJ . 
 
 THE CHURCH OF THE EARLY T M?D^E AGES Bv the Rev ^ 
 FATHERS. By the Rev. ALFRED "MA 
 
 y> r ' HUNT. M.A. 
 
 PLUMMER, D.D. 
 
 THE EVANGELICAL REVIVAL IN 
 THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 
 
 THE CHURCH AND THE 
 EASTERN EMPIRE. By the Rev. 
 
 inc. E.ivjn i E,iii^ x ii v-i^iii^/ii. _ --- - - 
 
 By the Rev. J. H. OVBRTON, D.D. H. F. TOZKR, M.A. 
 
 \continued.
 
 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Epochs of Church History. continued. 
 
 THE CHURCH AND THE ROMAN 
 EMPIRE. By the Rev. A. CARR, 
 M.A. 
 
 THE CHURCH AND THE PURI- 
 TANS, 1570-1660. By HENRY OFKLEY 
 WAKEMAN, M.A. 
 
 HILDEBRAND AND HIS TIMES. 
 By the Very Rev. W. R. W. STEPHENS, 
 B.D. 
 
 THE POPES AND THE HOHEN- 
 
 STAUFEN. By UGO BALZANI. 
 THE COUNTER REFORMATION. 
 
 By ADOLPHUS WILLIAM WARD, Litt.D. 
 WYCLIFFE AND MOVEMENTS 
 
 FOR REFORM. By REGINALD L. 
 
 POOLE, M.A. 
 THE ARIAN CONTROVERSY. By 
 
 the Rev. H. M. GWATKIN, M.A. 
 
 Eucharistic Manual (The). Consisting of Instructions and 
 
 Devotions for the Holy Sacrament of the Altar. From various sources. 
 ytmo. cloth gilt, red edges. \s. Cheap Edition, limp cloth, gd. 
 
 Farrar. Works by FREDERICK W. FARRAR, D.D., Dean of 
 Canterbury. 
 
 TEXTS EXPLAINED ; or, Helps to Understand the New Testament 
 Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 THE BIBLE : Its Meaning and Supremacy. 8vo. i$s. 
 
 ALLEGORIES. With 25 Illustrations by AMELIA BAUERLE. . Crown 
 
 8vo. 6s. 
 
 CONTENTS. The Life Story of Aner The Choice The Fortunes of a 
 Royal House The Basilisk and the Leopard. 
 
 Fosbery. VOICES OF COMFORT. Edited by the Rev. 
 THOMAS VINCENT FOSBERY, M.A., sometime Vicar of St. Giles's, 
 Reading. Cheap Edition. Small 8vo. 31. 6d. 
 
 The Larger "Edition (js. 6d.) may still be had. 
 
 Gardner. A CATECHISM OF CHURCH HISTORY, from 
 
 the Day of Pentecost until the Present Day. By the Rev. C. E. 
 GARDNER, of the Society of St. John the Evangelist, Cowley. Crown 
 8vo, sewed, is. ; cloth, is. 6d. 
 
 Geikie. Works by J. CUNNINGHAM GEIKIE, D.D., LL.D., late 
 Vicar of St. Martin-at-Palace, Norwich. 
 
 HOURS WITH THE BIBLE : the Scriptures in the Light of Modern 
 Discovery and Knowledge. Complete in Twelve Volumes. Crown 8vo. 
 
 OLD TESTAMENT. 
 CREATION TO THE PATRIARCHS. ! REHOBOAM TO HEZEKIAH. With 
 
 With a Map and Illustrations. 55. 
 
 MOSES TO JUDGES. With a Map 
 and Illustrations. $s. 
 
 SAMSON TO SOLOMON. With a 
 Map and Illustrations. 5^. 
 
 Illustrations. 5.?. 
 MANASSEH TO ZEDEKIAH. With 
 
 the Contemporary Prophets. With 
 
 a Map and Illustrations. 5*. 
 EXILE TO MALACHI. With the 
 
 Contemporary Prophets. With 
 
 Illustrations. 
 
 \continued.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 
 
 Greikie. Works by J. CUNNINGHAM GEIKIE, D.D., LL.D., late 
 Vicar of St. Martin-at-Palace, Norwich. continued. 
 NEW TESTAMENT. 
 
 THE GOSPELS. With a Map and 
 Illustrations, y. 
 
 LIFE AND WORDS OF CHRIST. 
 With Map. 2 vols. ios. 
 
 LIFE AND EPISTLES OF ST. PAUL. 
 With Maps and Illustrations. 
 z vols, ios. 
 ST. PETER TO REVELATION. With 
 29 Illustrations, y. 
 
 LIFE AND WORDS OF CHRIST. 
 
 Cabinet Edition. With Map. 2 vols. Post 8w. ios. 
 
 Cheap Edition, without the Notes, i vol. 8vo. 6s. 
 A SHORT LIFE OF CHRIST. With 34 Illustrations. Crown 8vt. 
 
 y. 6d. ; gilt edges, 45. 6d. 
 
 Gold Dust: a Collection of Golden Counsels for the Sancti- 
 fication of Daily Life. Translated and abridged from the French by 
 E.L.E.E. Edited by CHARLOTTE M. YONGK. Parts I. II. III. 
 Small Pocket Volumes. Cloth, gilt, each is. Parts I. and II. in One 
 Volume, is. 6d. Parts I., II., and III. in One Volume, zs. 
 
 ** The two first parts in One Volume, large type, i8mo. cloth, gilt. zs. f>d. 
 Parts I. II. and III. are also supplied, bound in white cloth, with red 
 edges, in box, price 3.*. 
 
 Gore. Works by the Rev. CHARLES GORE, M.A., D.D., Canon 
 
 of Westminster, Chaplain in Ordinary to the Queen. 
 THE CHURCH AND THE MINISTRY. Fourth Edition, Revised. 
 
 Crown 8vo. 6s. , net. 
 ROMAN CATHOLIC CLAIMS. Crown 8vo. y.6d. 
 
 Goreh. THE LIFE OF FATHER GOREH. By C. E. 
 
 GARDNER, S.S.J.E. Edited, with Preface, by RICHARD MEUX BEN- 
 SON, M. A., S.S.J.E., Student of Christ Church, Oxford. With Portrait. 
 Crown 8vo. 5-f. 
 
 Great Truths of the Christian Religion. Edited by the Rev. 
 W. U. RICHARDS. Small 8vo. zs. 
 
 Gurnbill. THE MORALS OF SUICIDE. By the Rev. J. 
 
 GURNHII.L, B.A. , Scholar and Moral Science Prizeman of Emmanuel 
 College, Cambridge. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 Hall. Works by the Right Rev. A. C. A. HALL, D.D., Bishop 
 
 of Vermont. 
 CONFIRMATION. Crown 8vo. $s. (The Oxford Library of Practical 
 
 Theology. ) 
 
 THE VIRGIN MOTHER: Retreat Addresses on the Lite of the 
 Blessed Virgin Mary as told in the Gospels. With an appended 
 Essay on the Virgin Birth of our Lord. Crown 8vo. 4*. 6d. 
 CHRIST'S TEMPTATION AND OURS. Crown 8vo. y. 64. 
 A2
 
 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Hall. THE KENOTIC THEORY. Considered with Parti- 
 cular Reference to its Anglican Forms and Arguments. By the Rev. 
 FRANCIS J. HALL, D.D., Instructor of Dogmatic Theology in the 
 Western Theological Seminary, Chicago, Illinois. Crown 8vo. 5*. 
 
 Hallowing of Sorrow. By E. R. With a Preface by H. S. 
 HOLLAND, M.A., Canon and Precentor of St. Paul's. Small 8vo. zs. 
 
 Hanbury - Tracy. FAITH AND PROGRESS. Sermons 
 
 Preached at the Dedication Festival of St. Barnabas' Church, Pim- 
 lico, June 10-17, 1900. Edited by the Rev. the Hon. A. HANBURY- 
 TRACY, Vicar of St. Barnabas', Pimlico. With an Introduction by the 
 Rev. T. T. CARTER, M.A., of Clewer. 
 
 'Worship' The Very Rev. the DEAN OF CHICHESTER. ' The Intellectual Obli- 
 gations of Love' The Rev. H. S. HOLLAND, Canon of St. Paul's. 'Parochial 
 Organisation' The Rev. H. M. VILLIERS, Vicar of St. Paul's, Knightsbridge. 
 1 Religious Education ' The Rev. B. REYNOLDS, Prebendary of St. Paul's. ' De- 
 votion 1 The Rev. W. C. E. NEWBOLT, Canon of St. Paul's. ' Penitence 'The 
 Rev. E. F. RUSSELL, St. Alban's, Holborn. ' The Sanctification of Individual 
 Life' The Rev. V. S. S. COLES, Principal of Pusey House. 'The Revival of the 
 Religious Life 'The Rev. R. M. BENSON, S.S.J.E. 'The Blessed Sacrament 1 
 The Rev. DARWELL STONE, Principal of Dorchester College. To which are appended 
 'Prayer for the Departed 1 and ' Eucharistical Adoration" Two Sermons by the 
 Rev. the Hon. A. HANBURY-TRACY. 
 
 Harrison. Works by the Rev. ALEXANDER J. HARRISON, B.D., 
 
 Lecturer of the Christian Evidence Society. 
 PROBLEMS OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCEPTICISM. Crown 8vo. 
 
 js. 6d. 
 THE CHURCH IN RELATION TO SCEPTICS : a Conversational 
 
 Guide to Evidential Work. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE REPOSE OF FAITH, IN VIEW OF PRESENT DAY DIFFI- 
 CULTIES. Crown 8vo. -js. 6d. 
 
 Hatch. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE EARLY 
 CHRISTIAN CHURCHES. Being the Bampton Lectures for 1880. 
 By EDWIN HATCH, M.A., D.D., late Reader in Ecclesiastical History 
 in the University of Oxford. 8vo. 55. 
 
 Holland. Works by the Rev. HENRY SCOTT HOLLAND, M.A., 
 Canon and Precentor of St. Paul's. 
 
 GOD'S CITY AND THE COMING OF THE KINGDOM. Crown 
 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 PLEAS AND CLAIMS FOR CHRIST. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 CREED AND CHARACTER : Sermons. Crown 8vo. 35. 6d. 
 ON BEHALF OF BELIEF. Sermons. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 CHRIST OR ECCLESIASTES. Sermons. Crown 8vo. zs. 6d. 
 LOGIC AND LIFE, with other Sermons. Crown 8vo. y. 6d.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. n 
 
 Rollings. Works by the Rev. G. S. ROLLINGS, Mission Priest of 
 the Society of St. John the Evangelist, Cowley, Oxford. 
 
 THE HEAVENLY STAIR ; or, A Ladder of the Love of God for Sinners. 
 Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 
 PORTA REGALIS ; or, Considerations on Prayer. Crown Svo. limp cloth, 
 is. 6d. net ; cloth boards, zs. net. 
 
 CONSIDERATIONS ON THE WISDOM OF GOD. CrvwnSvo. 4*. 
 
 PARADOXES OF THE LOVE OF GOD, especially as they are seen in 
 the way of the Evangelical Counsels. Crown 8vo. 41. 
 
 ONE BORN OF THE SPIRIT ; or, the Unification of our Life in God. 
 Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 
 Hatchings. Works by the Ven. W. H. HUTCHINGS, M.A. Arch- 
 deacon of Cleveland, Canon of York, Rector of Kirby 
 Misperton, and Rural Dean of Malton. 
 
 SERMON SKETCHES from some of the Sunday Lessons throughout 
 the Church's Year. Vols. I and II. Crown Bvo. $s. each. 
 
 THE LIFE OF PRAYER : a Course of Lectures delivered in All Saints 
 Church, Margaret Street, during Lent. Crown Svo. <}j. 6d. 
 
 THE PERSON AND WORK OF THE HOLY GHOST : a Doctrinal 
 and Devotional Treatise. Crown 8vo. 41. 6d. 
 
 SOME ASPECTS OF THE CROSS. Crown Svo. 4*. 6d. 
 
 THE MYSTERY OF THE TEMPTATION. Lent Lectures delivered at 
 St. Mary Magdalene, Paddington. Crown Svo. 41. 6d. 
 
 Button. THE SOUL HERE AND HEREAFTER. By the 
 Rev. R. E. HUTTON, Chaplain of St. Margaret's, East Grinstead. 
 Crown Svo. 6s. 
 
 Inheritance of the Saints ; or, Thoughts on the Communion 
 of Saints and the Life of the World to come. Collected chiefly 
 from English Writers by L. P. With a Preface by the Rev. HENRY 
 SCOTT HOLLAND, M.A. Ninth Edition. Crown Svo, js. 6d. 
 
 Jameson. Works by Mrs. JAMESON. 
 
 SACRED AND LEGENDARY ART, containing Legends of the Angels 
 and Archangels, the Evangelists, the Apostles. With 19 Etchings and 
 187 Woodcuts. 2 volt. Svo. 20J. net. 
 
 [continued.
 
 12 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Jameson. Works by Mrs. JAMESON. continued. 
 
 LEGENDS OF THE MONASTIC ORDERS, as represented in the 
 
 Fine Arts. With n Etchings and 88 Woodcuts. Svo. los. net. 
 LEGENDS OF THE MADONNA, OR BLESSED VIRGIN MARY. 
 
 With 27 Etchings and 165 Woodcuts. Svo. los. net. 
 THE HISTORY OF OUR LORD, as exemplified in Works of Art. 
 
 Commenced by the late Mrs. JAMESON ; continued and completed by 
 
 LADY EASTLAKE. With 31 Etchings and 281 Woodcuts. 2 Vols. 
 
 8vo. 2os. net. 
 
 Jennings. ECCLES I A ANGLICANA. A History of the 
 Church of Christ in England from the Earliest to the Present Times. 
 By the Rev. ARTHUR CHARLES JENNINGS, M.A. Crown Svo. 75. 6d. 
 
 Johnstone. SONSHIP : Six Lenten Addresses. By the Rev. 
 VERNEY LOVETT JOHNSTONE, M.A., late Assistant Curate of 
 Ilfracombe. With an Introduction by the Rev. V. S. S. COLES, 
 M.A. , Principal of the Pusey House, Oxford. Crown Svo. 2s. 
 
 Jukes. Works by ANDREW JUKES. 
 
 THE NEW MAN AND THE ETERNAL LIFE. Notes on the 
 Reiterated Amens of the Son of God. Crown Svo. 6s. 
 
 THE NAMES OF GOD IN HOLY SCRIPTURE : a Revelation of 
 His Nature and Relationships. Crown Svo. 4^. 6d. 
 
 THE TYPES OF GENESIS. Crown Svo. 7 s. 6d. 
 
 THE SECOND DEATH AND THE RESTITUTION OF ALL 
 THINGS. Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE ORDER AND CONNEXION OF THE CHURCH'S TEACH- 
 ING, as set forth in the arrangement of the Epistles and Gospels 
 throughout the Year. Crown Svo. 2s. 6d. 
 
 Knox Little. Works by W. J. KNOX LITTLE, M.A., Canon 
 Residentiary of Worcester, and Vicar of Hoar Cross. 
 
 HOLY MATRIMONY. Crown Svo. 55. [The Oxford Library of 
 Practical Theology.] 
 
 THE PERFECT LIFE : Sermons. Crown Svo. js. 6d. 
 THE CHRISTIAN HOME. Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 
 CHARACTERISTICS AND MOTIVES OF THE CHRISTIAN 
 LIFE. Ten Sermons preached in Manchester Cathedral, in Lent and 
 Advent. Crown Svo. zs. 6d. 
 
 {continued.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 
 
 Knox Little. Works by W. J. KNOX LITTLE, M.A., Canon 
 Residentiary of Worcester, and Vicar of Hoar Cross. 
 continued. 
 
 SERMONS PREACHED FOR THE MOST PART IN MANCHES- 
 TER. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE HOPES AND DECISIONS OF THE PASSION OF OUR 
 MOST HOLY REDEEMER. Crown 8vo. as. 6d. 
 
 THE MYSTERY OF THE PASSION OF OUR MOST HOLY 
 REDEEMER. Crown 8vo. as. 6d. 
 
 THE LIGHT OF LIFE. Sermons preached on Various Occasions. 
 Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 SUNLIGHT AND SHADOW IN THE CHRISTIAN LIFE. 
 Sermons preached for the most part in America. Crown Zvo. y. 6d. 
 
 Lear. Works by, and Edited by, H. L. SIDNEY LEAR. 
 
 FOR DAYS AND YEARS. A book containing a Text. Short Reading, 
 and Hymn for Every Day in the Church's Year. i6mo. as. 6d. Also a 
 Cheap Edition, ytmo. is.; or cloth gilt, is. 6d. ; orwith red borders, as. 6d. 
 
 FIVE MINUTES. Daily Readings of Poetry. i6mo. y. 6d. Also a 
 Cheap Edition, ytmo. is.; or cloth gilt, is. 6d. 
 
 WEARINESS. A Book for the Languid and Lonely. Large Type. 
 Small 8vo. y. 
 
 CHRISTIAN BIOGRAPHIES. 
 
 MADAME LOUISE DE FRANCE, 
 Daughter of Louis xv., known 
 also as the Mother Te"rese de 
 St. Augustin. 
 
 A DOMINICAN ARTIST : a Sketch of 
 the Life of the Rev. Pere Besson, 
 of the Order of St. Dominic. 
 
 HENRI PERREYVE. By PERE 
 
 GRATRY. 
 ST. FRANCIS DE SALES, Bishop and 
 
 Prince of Geneva. 
 
 Nine Vols. Crown 8w. y. 6tf. each. 
 
 THE REVIVAL OF PRIESTLY LIFE 
 IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 
 IN FRANCE. 
 
 A CHRISTIAN PAINTER OF THE 
 NINETEENTH CENTURY. 
 
 BOSSUET AND HIS CONTEMPORA- 
 RIES. 
 
 FENELON, ARCHBISHOP OF CAM- 
 
 BRAI. 
 HENRI DOMINIQUE LACORDAIRE. 
 
 DEVOTIONAL WORKS. Edited by H. L. SIDNEY LEAR. New and 
 Uniform Editions. Nine Vols. i6mo. as. 6d. each. 
 
 FENELON'S SPIRITUAL LETTERS TO 
 MEN 
 
 FENELON'S SPIRITUAL LETTERS TO 
 WoMKN 
 
 A SELECTION FROM THE SPIRITUAL 
 LETTERS OF ST. FRANCIS DE 
 
 . cloth limp ; is. cloth boards. 
 
 [continued.
 
 14 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Lear. Works by, and Edited by, H. L. SIDNEY LEAR. 
 continued. 
 
 THE SPIRIT OF ST. FRANCIS DE 
 SALES. 
 
 THE HIDDEN LIFE OF THE SOUL. 
 
 LOVE OF GOD. 
 THE LIGHT OF THE CONSCIENCE. 
 
 Also Cheap Edition, yimo, 6d. 
 cloth limp ; and u. c loth boards. 
 
 SELF-RENUNCIATION. From the 
 French. 
 
 ST. FRANCIS DE SALES' OF THE 
 
 SELECTIONS FROM PASCAL'S 
 ' THOUGHTS.' 
 
 Lepine. THE MINISTERS OF JESUS CHRIST. By J. 
 FOSTER LEPINE, Curate of St. Paul's, Maidstone. Parts i. and n. 
 Crown 8vo. 55. each. 
 
 Liddon. Works by HENRY PARRY LIDDON, D.D.,D.C.L.,LL.D. 
 
 SERMONS ON SOME WORDS OF ST. PAUL. Crown 8vo. gj. 
 
 SERMONS PREACHED ON SPECIAL OCCASIONS, 1860-1889. 
 Crown 8vo. gj. 
 
 CLERICAL LIFE AND WORK : Sermons. Crown 8vo. $s. 
 
 ESSAYS AND ADDRESSES : Lectures on Buddhism Lectures on the 
 Life of St. Paul Papers on Dante. Crown 8vo. 55. 
 
 EXPLANATORY ANALYSIS OF PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE 
 ROMANS. 8vo. 14*. 
 
 EXPLANATORY ANALYSIS OF ST. PAUL'S FIRST EPISTLE 
 TO TIMOTHY. 8vo. 75. 6d. 
 
 SERMONS ON OLD TESTAMENT SUBJECTS. Crown 8va. 53. 
 SERMONS ON SOME WORDS OF CHRIST. Crown 8vo. gj. 
 
 THE DIVINITY OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST. 
 Being the Bampton Lectures for 1866. Crown 8vo. gj. 
 
 ADVENT IN ST. PAUL'S. Two Vols. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. each. 
 Cheap Edition in one Volume. Crown 8vo. gj. 
 
 CHRISTMASTIDE IN ST. PAUL'S. Crown 8vo. gj. 
 PASSIONTIDE SERMONS. Crown 8vo. 51. 
 
 EASTER IN ST. PAUL'S. Sermons bearing chiefly on the Resurrec- 
 tion of our Lord. Two Vols. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. each. Cheap 
 Edition in one Volume. Crown 8vo. gj. 
 
 SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF 
 OXFORD. Two Vols. Crown 8vo. $s. >d. each. Cheap Edition in 
 one Volume. Crown 8vo. gj. 
 
 THE MAGNIFICAT. Sermons in St. Paul's. Crown Zvo. zs. 6d. 
 
 \contimtcd.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 15 
 
 Liddon. Works by HENRY PARRY LIDDON, D.D., D.C.L., 
 LL. D. continued. 
 
 SOME ELEMENTS OF RELIGION. Lent Lectures. Small 8vo. 
 2s. 6d. [Tke Crown 8vo Edition ($s.) may still be had.'] 
 
 SELECTIONS FROM THE WRITINGS OF. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 Luckock. Works by HERBERT MORTIMER LUCKOCK, D.D., 
 Dean of Lichfield. 
 
 THE SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FOUR GOSPELS. 
 Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 THE HISTORY OF MARRIAGE, JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN, IN 
 RELATION TO DIVORCE AND CERTAIN FORBIDDEN 
 DEGREES. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 AFTER DEATH. An Examination of the Testimony of Primitive 
 Times respecting the State of the Faithful Dead, and their Relationship 
 to the Living. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE INTERMEDIATE STATE BETWEEN DEATH AND 
 JUDGMENT. Being a Sequel to After Death. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 FOOTPRINTS OF THE SON OF MAN, as traced by St. Mark. Being 
 Eighty Portions for Private Study, Family Reading, and Instruction 
 in Church. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 FOOTPRINTS OF THE APOSTLES, as traced by St. Luke in the 
 Acts. Being Sixty Portions for Private Study, and Instruction in 
 Church. A Sequel to ' Footprints of the Son of Man, as traced by 
 St. Mark. 1 Two Vols. Crown 8vo. I2J. 
 
 THE DIVINE LITURGY. Being the Order for Holy Communion, 
 Historically, Doctrinally, and Devotionally set forth, in Fifty Portions. 
 Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF THE BOOK OF COMMON 
 PRAYER. The Anglican Reform The Puritan Innovations The 
 Elizabethan Reaction The Caroline Settlement. With Appendices. 
 Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE BISHOPS IN THE TOWER. A Record of Stirring Events 
 affecting the Church and Nonconformists from the Restoration to the 
 Revolution. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 MacColL Works by the Rev. MALCOLM MACCOLL, D.D., Canon 
 Residentiary of Ripon. 
 
 THE REFORMATION SETTLEMENT : Examined in the Light of 
 History and Law. Eighth and Cheaper Edition, Revised and Enlarged. 
 Crown 8vo. y. 6d. net. 
 
 CHRISTIANITY IN RELATION TO SCIENCE AND MORALS. 
 Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 LIFE HERE AND HEREAFTER : Sermons. Crown 8vo. ^s. 6d.
 
 16 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Marriage Addresses and Marriage Hymns. By the BISHOP OF 
 LONDON, the BISHOP OF ROCHESTER, the BISHOP OF TRURO, the DEAN 
 OF ROCHESTER, the DEAN OF NORWICH, ARCHDEACON SINCLAIR, 
 CANON DUCKWORTH, CANON NEWBOLT, CANON KNOX LITTLE, 
 CANON RAWNSLEY, the Rev. J. LLEWELLYN DAVIES, D.D., the Rev. 
 W. ALLEN WHITWORTH, etc. Edited by the Rev. O. P. WARDELL- 
 YERBURGH, M.A., Vicar of the Abbey Church of St. Mary, Tewkesbury. 
 Crown Svo. 5.5. 
 
 Mason. Works by A. J. MASON, D.D., Lady Margaret Professor 
 of Divinity in the University of Cambridge and Canon of Canterbury. 
 
 THE CONDITIONS OF OUR LORD'S LIFE UPON EARTH. 
 
 Being the Bishop Paddock Lectures, 1896. Crown Svo. $s. 
 THE FAITH OF THE GOSPEL. A Manual of Christian Doctrine. 
 
 Crown Svo. js. 6d. Cheap Edition. Crown Svo. %s. 6d. 
 THE RELATION OF CONFIRMATION TO BAPTISM. As taught 
 
 in Holy Scripture and the Fathers. Crown Svo. -js. 6d. 
 
 Maturin. Works by the Rev. B. W. MATURIN. 
 
 SOME PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF THE SPIRITUAL 
 
 LIFE. Crown Svo. 4?. 6d. 
 PRACTICAL STUDIES ON THE PARABLES OF OUR LORD. 
 
 Crown Svo. $s. 
 
 Medd. THE PRIEST TO THE ALTAR ; or, Aids to the 
 
 Devout Celebration of Holy Communion, chiefly after the Ancient 
 English Use of Sarum. By PETER GOLDSMITH MEDD, M.A., Canon 
 of St. Alban's. Fourth Edition, revised and enlarged. Royal Svo. 155. 
 
 Meyrick. THE DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH OF 
 
 England on the Holy Communion Restated as a Guide at the Present 
 Time. By the Rev. F. MEYRICK, M.A. Crown Svo. 4^. 6d. 
 
 Mortimer. Works by the Rev. A. G. MORTIMER, D.D., Rector 
 
 of St. Mark's, Philadelphia. 
 THE EUCHARISTIC SACRIFICE. Crown Svo. 
 
 CATHOLIC FAITH AND PRACTICE: A Manual of Theology. Two 
 Parts. Crown Svo. Sold Separately. Part I. js. 6d. Part n. gs. 
 
 JESUS AND THE RESURRECTION: Thirty Addresses for Good 
 Friday and Easter. Crown Svo. $s. 
 
 HELPS TO MEDITATION : Sketches for Every Day in the Year. 
 Vol. i. ADVENT TO TRINITY. Svo. js. 6d. 
 Vol. n. TRINITY TO ADVENT. Svo. 75. 6d. 
 
 STORIES FROM GENESIS: Sermons for Children. CrownSvo. 45. 
 THE LAWS OF HAPPINESS ; or, The Beatitudes as teaching our 
 Duty to God, Self, and our Neighbour. i8mo. zs. 
 
 [continued.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 17 
 
 Mortimer. Works by the Rev. A. G. MORTIMER, D.D., Rector 
 of St. Mark's, Philadelphia. continued. 
 
 THE LAWS OF PENITENCE: Addresses on the Words of our Lord 
 from the Cross. i6mo. is. 6d. 
 
 SERMONS IN MINIATURE FOR EXTEMPORE PREACHERS: 
 Sketches for Every Sunday and Holy Day of the Christian Year. 
 Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 NOTES pN THE SEVEN PENITENTIAL PSALMS, chiefly from 
 Patristic Sources. Small 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE SEVEN LAST WORDS OF OUR MOST HOLY REDEEMER : 
 with Meditations on some Scenes in His Passion. Crown 8vo. 55. 
 
 LEARN OF JESUS CHRIST TO DIE : Addresses on the Words of our 
 Lord from the Cross, taken as teaching the way of Preparation for 
 Death. i6mo. zs. 
 
 Mozley. Works by J. B. MOZLEY, D.D., late Canon of Christ 
 
 Church, and Regius Professor of Divinity at Oxford. 
 ESSAYS, HISTORICAL AND THEOLOGICAL. Two Vols. 8vo. 
 
 24f. 
 
 EIGHT LECTURES ON MIRACLES. Being the Bampton Lectures 
 for 1865. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 RULING IDEAS IN EARLY AGES AND THEIR RELATION 
 TO OLD TESTAMENT FAITH. 8vo. 6s. 
 
 SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF 
 OXFORD, and on Various Occasions. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 SERMONS, PAROCHIAL AND OCCASIONAL. Crown 8vo. 
 
 y.6d. 
 
 A REVIEW OF THE BAPTISMAL CONTROVERSY. Crown 8vo. 
 y.6d. 
 
 Newbolt. Works by the Rev. W. C. E. NEWBOLT, M.A., Canon 
 and Chancellor of St. Paul's Cathedral. 
 
 RELIGION. Crown 8vo. y ( Tne Oxford Library of Practical 
 
 Theology.) 
 THE DIAL OF PRAYER : being Devotions for Every Hour. Small 
 
 8vo. zs. 
 WORDS OF EXHORTATION. Sermons Preached at St Paul's and 
 
 elsewhere. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 PRIESTLY IDEALS ; being a Course of Practical Lectures delivered in 
 
 St. Paul's Cathedral to ' Our Society ' and other Clergy, in Lent, 1898. 
 
 Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 [continued.
 
 i8 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Newbolt. Works by the Rev. W. C. E. NEWBOLT, M.A., Canon 
 and Chancellor of St. Paul's Cathedral. continued. 
 
 THE GOSPEL OF EXPERIENCE ; or, the Witness of Human Life 
 to the truth of Revelation. Being the Boyle Lectures for 1895. 
 Crown 8vo. y, 
 
 COUNSELS OF FAITH AND PRACTICE : being Sermons preached 
 on various occasions. Crown 8vo. s. 
 
 SPECULUM SACERDOTUM ; or, the Divine Model of the Priestly 
 Life. Crown 8vo. 75. 6d. 
 
 THE FRUIT OF THE SPIRIT. Being Ten Addresses bearing on 
 the Spiritual Life. Crown 8v0, zs, 6d. 
 
 THE MAN OF GOD. Small 8vo. is. 6d. 
 
 THE PRAYER BOOK : Its Voice and Teaching. Crown 8vo. zs. 6d. 
 
 Newman. Works by JOHN HENRY NEWMAN, B.D., sometime 
 Vicar of St. Mary's, Oxford. 
 
 LETTERS AND CORRESPONDENCE OF JOHN HENRY NEW- 
 MAN DURING HIS LIFE IN THE ENGLISH CHURCH. With 
 a brief Autobiography. Edited, at Cardinal Newman's request, by 
 ANNE MOZLEY. z vols. Crown 8vo. 75. 
 
 PAROCHIAL AND PLAIN SERMONS. Eight Vols. Cabinet Edition. 
 Crown 8vo. 5*. each. Cheaper Edition. 31. 6d. each. 
 
 SELECTION, ADAPTED TO THE SEASONS OF THE ECCLE- 
 SIASTICAL YEAR, from .he ' Parochial and Plain Sermons, 1 
 Cabinet Edition. Crown 8vo. $s. Cheaper Edition, y. 6d. 
 
 FIFTEEN SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY 
 OF OXFORD. Cabinet Edition. CrownZvo. 55. Cheaper Edition. y.6d. 
 
 SERMONS BEARING UPON SUBJECTS OF THE DAY. Cabinet 
 Edition. Crown 8vo. $s. Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 LECTURES ON THE DOCTRINE OF JUSTIFICATION. Cabinet 
 
 Edition. Crown 8vo. $s. Cheaper Edition, y. 6d. 
 *** A Complete List of Cardinal Newman's Works can b had on Application. 
 
 Osborne. Works by EDWARD OSBORNE, Mission Priest of the 
 Society of St. John the Evangelist, Cowley, Oxford. 
 
 THE CHILDREN'S SAVIOUR. Instructions to Children on the Life 
 of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Illustrated. i6mo. zs. 6d. 
 
 THE SAVIOUR KING. Instructions to Children on Old Testament 
 Types and Illustrations of the Life of Christ. Illustrated. i6mo. zs. 6d. 
 
 THE CHILDREN'S FAITH. Instructions to Children on the Apostles' 
 Creed. Illustrated, i&mo. zs. 6d.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE. 19 
 
 Ottley. ASPECTS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT: being the 
 Bampton Lectures for 1897. By ROBERT LAWRENCE OTTLEY, M.A., 
 Vicar of Winterbourne Bassett, Wilts ; sometime Principal of the 
 Pusey House. 8vo. 75. 6d. 
 
 Ube jfort> Xibrars of practical 
 
 PRODUCED UNDER THE EDITORSHIP OF 
 
 The Rev. W. C. E. NEWBOLT, M.A., Canon and Chancellor of 
 
 St. Paul's, and the Rev. DARWELL STONE, M.A., Principal 
 
 of the Missionary College, Dorchester. 
 
 The Price of each Volume will be Five Shillings, 
 
 The following is a list of Volumes as at present proposed : 
 
 RELIGION. By the Rev. W. C. E. NEWBOLT, M.A., Canon and 
 Chancellor of St. Paul's. {Ready. 
 
 HOLY BAPTISM. By the Rev. DARWELL STONE, M.A., Principal 
 of the Missionary College, Dorchester. [Ready. 
 
 CONFIRMATION. By the Right Rev. A. C. A. HALL, D.D., 
 Bishop of Vermont. [Ready. 
 
 THE HISTORY OF THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER. By 
 the Rev. LEIGHTON PULLAN, M.A., Fellow of St. John Baptist's 
 College, Oxford. [Ready. 
 
 HOLY MATRIMONY. By the Rev. W. J. KNOX LITTLE, M.A.. 
 Canon of Worcester. [Nearly Ready. 
 
 THE HOLY COMMUNION. By the Rev. F. W. PULLER, M.A., 
 Mission Priest of St. John Evangelist, Cowley. 
 
 PRAYER. By the Rev. A. J. WORLLEDGE, M.A., Canon of Truro. 
 
 VISITATION OF THE SICK. By the Rev. E. F. RUSSELL, M.A., 
 St. Alban's, Holborn. 
 
 SUNDAY. By the Rev. W. B. TREVELYAN, M.A., Vicar of St. 
 Matthew's, Westminster. 
 
 THE INCARNATION. By the Rev. H. V. S. ECK, M.A., St. 
 Andrew's, Bethnal Green. 
 
 CONFESSION and ABSOLUTION. 
 FASTING and ALMSGIVING. 
 
 DEVOTIONAL BOOKS and READING. 
 ORDINATION. 
 
 RETREATS, MISSIONS, ETC. FOREIGN MISSIONS. 
 CHURCH WORK. | THE BIBLE.
 
 20 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Paget. Works by FRANCIS PAGET, D.D., Dean of Christ Church. 
 
 STUDIES IN THE CHRISTIAN CHARACTER: Sermons. With an 
 Introductory Essay. Crown 8vo. 45. net. 
 
 THE SPIRIT OF DISCIPLINE : Sermons. Crown 8vo. 4*. net. 
 
 FACULTIES AND DIFFICULTIES FOR BELIEF AND DIS- 
 BELIEF. Crown 8vo. 41. net. 
 
 THE HALLOWING OF WORK. Addresses given at Eton, January 
 16-18, 1888. Small 8vo. zs. 
 
 THE REDEMPTION OF WAR : Sermons. Crown 8vo. zs. net. 
 
 Passmore. THE THINGS BEYOND THE TOMB IN A 
 CATHOLIC LIGHT. By the Rev. T. H. PASSMORE, M.A. 
 Crown 8vo. 2S. 6d. net. 
 
 Percival. THE INVOCATION OF SAINTS. Treated Theo- 
 logically and Historically. By HENRY R. PERCIVAL, M.A., D.D., 
 Author of 'A Digest of Theology,' 'The Doctrine of the Episcopal 
 Church,' etc. Crown 8vo. 5*. 
 
 Pocket Manual of Prayers for the Hours, Etc. With the 
 
 Collects from the Prayer Book. Royal yimo. is. 
 
 Powell. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE INCARNATION. 
 With especial Reference to the Relation between our Lord's Divine 
 Omniscience and His Human Consciousness. By the Rev. H. C. 
 POWELL, M.A. of Oriel College, Oxford ; Rector of Wylye and Pre- 
 bendary of Salisbury Cathedral. 8vo. i6s. 
 
 Practical Eeflections. By a CLERGYMAN. With Preface by 
 H. P. LIDDON, D.D., D.C.L., and the LORD BISHOP OF LINCOLN. 
 Crown 8vo. 
 
 THE BOOK OF GENESIS. 4?. 6d. 
 THE PSALMS. 5*. 
 ISAIAH. 45. 6d. 
 
 THE MINOR PROPHETS. 4*. 6d. 
 THE HOLY GOSPELS. 4*. 6d. 
 ACTS TO REVELATION. 6s. 
 
 Priest's Prayer Book (The). Containing Private Prayers and 
 Intercessions ; Occasional, School, and Parochial Offices ; Offices for 
 the Visitation of the Sick, with Notes, Readings, Collects, Hymns, 
 Litanies, etc. With a brief Pontifical. By the late Rev. R. F. 
 LITTLEDALE, LL.D., D.C.L., and Rev. J. EDWARD VAUX, M.A., 
 F.S.A. PostSvo. 6s. 6d. 
 
 Pullan. Works by the Rev. LEIGHTON PULLAN, M.A., Fellow 
 
 of St. John Baptist's College. 
 LECTURES ON RELIGION. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 THE HISTORY OF THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER. Crown 
 8vo. 5.*. (The Oxford Library of Practical Theology. )
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITER A TURE. 
 
 Puller. THE PRIMITIVE SAINTS AND THE SEE OF 
 ROME. By F. W. PULLER, of the Society of St. John the Evan- 
 gelist, Cowley. With an Introduction by EDWARD, LORD BISHOP OK 
 LINCOLN. Third Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Svo. 165. net. 
 
 Pusey. Works by the Rev. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. 
 
 PRIVATE PRAYERS. With Preface by H. P. LIDDON, D.D., 
 late Chancellor and Canon of St. Paul's. Royal yzmo. is. 
 
 SPIRITUAL LETTERS OF EDWARD BOUVERIE PUSEY, 
 D.D. Edited and prepared for publication by the Rev. J. O. 
 JOHNSTON, M.A., Principal of the Theological College, Cuddesdon ; 
 and the Rev. W. C. E. NEWBOLT, M.A., Canon and Chancellor of St. 
 Paul's. Svo. izs. 6d. 
 
 Pusey. THE STORY OF THE LIFE OF DR. PUSEY. 
 
 By the Author of ' Charles Lowder." With Frontispiece. Crown Svo. 
 js. 6d. net. 
 
 *#* This Life is not an abridgment of Dr. Liddoris work, but an entirely 
 independent memoir. 
 
 Randolph. Works by B. W. RANDOLPH, M.A., Principal of the 
 Theological College and Hon. Canon of Ely. 
 
 MEDITATIONS ON THE OLD TESTAMENT for Every Day in 
 the Year. Crown Svo. 6s. 
 
 THE THRESHOLD OF THE SANCTUARY: being Short Chapters 
 on the Inner Preparation for the Priesthood. Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 
 Rede THE COMMUNION OF SAINTS: A Lost Link in the 
 Chain of the Church's Creed. By WYLLYS REDE, D.D., Rector of 
 the Church of the Incarnation, and Canon of the Cathedral, Atalanta, 
 Georgia. With a Preface by LORD HALIFAX. Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 
 Robbins. AN ESSAY TOWARD FAITH. By WILFORD L. 
 
 ROBBINS, D.D., Dean of the Cathedral of All Saints', Albany, U.S. 
 Fcap. Svo. y. net. 
 
 Robinson. STUDIES IN THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST. 
 By the Rev. C. H. ROBINSON, M.A., Canon Missioner of Ripon ; 
 Reader in Hausa in the University of Cambridge. Crown Svo. y.6d. 
 
 Romanes. THOUGHTS ON THE COLLECTS FOR THE 
 
 TRINITY SEASON. By ETHEL ROMANES, Author of 'The Life 
 and Letters of George John Romanes. ' With a Preface by the Right 
 Rev. the BISHOP OF STEPNEY. iSmo. zs. 6d. ; gilt edges, y. 6d. 
 
 Royce. THE CONCEPTION OF IMMORTALITY : the 
 Ingersoll Lecture, 1899. By JOSIAH ROYCE, Professor of the History 
 of Philosophy at Harvard University. Crown Sw.
 
 22 A SELECTION OF WORKS 
 
 Sanday. Works by W. SAND AY, D.D., Margaret Professor of 
 Divinity and Canon of Christ Church, Oxford. 
 
 DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF PRIESTHOOD AND SACRI- 
 FICE : a Report of a Conference held at Oxford, December 13 and 
 14, 1899. Edited by W. SANDAY, D.D., LL.D., Lady Margaret 
 Professor of Divinity and Canon of Christ Church. Svo. 
 The following are the names of those who attended the Conference : The Rev. F. 
 W. PULLER, Society of St. John the Evangelist, Cowley St. John ; The Rev. R. C. 
 MOBERLY, D.D., Oxford; The Rev. C. GORE, D.D., Westminster; The Rev. H. 
 S. HOLLAND, St. Paul's ; The Rev. C. G. LANG, Portsea ; The Rev. Archdeacon 
 WILSON, Rochdale; The Rev. H. E. RYLE, D.D., Cambridge; The Rev. E. R. 
 BERNARD, Salisbury ; The Rev. W. SANDAY, D.D., Oxford ; The Rev. A. M. FAIR- 
 BAIRN, D.D., Oxford; The Rev. S. D. F. SALMOND, D.D., Aberdeen; The Rev. 
 W. T. DAVISON, Handsworth ; The Rev. G. S. BARRKTT, D.D., Norwich; The 
 Rev. P. T. FORSYTH, Cambridge. 
 
 THE CONCEPTION OF PRIESTHOOD IN THE EARLY CHURCH 
 AND IN THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND: Four Sermons. 
 Crown 8vo. $s. 6d. 
 
 INSPIRATION : Eight Lectures on the Early History and Origin of 
 the Doctrine of Biblical Inspiration. Being the Bampton Lectures 
 for 1893. New and Cheaper Edition, with New Preface. Svo. 
 TS. 6d. 
 
 Scudamore. STEPS TO THE ALTAR: a Manual of Devotion 
 for the Blessed Eucharist. By the Rev. W. E. SCUDAMORE, M.A. 
 Royal 32010. is. 
 On toned paper, with red rubrics, zs. : The same, with Collects, Epistles, and 
 
 Gospels, zs. 6d. ; Demy iSmo, cloth, is. ; Demy iSmo, cloth, large type, is. $d. ; 
 
 Imperial yimo, limp cloth, 6d. 
 
 Simpson. Works by the Rev. W. J. SPARROW SIMPSON, M.A., 
 
 Vicar of St. Mark's, Regent's Park. 
 THE CHURCH AND THE BIBLE. Crown Svo. y. 6d. 
 THE CLAIMS OF JESUS CHRIST : Lent Lectures. Crown Svo. yt. 
 MEMOIR OF THE REV. W. SPARROW SIMPSON, D.D., Sub- 
 Dean of St. Paul's Cathedral. With Portrait and other Illustrations. 
 Crown Svo. ^s. 6d. 
 
 Stone. Works by the Rev. DARWELL STONE, M.A., Principal 
 
 of Dorchester Missionary College. 
 
 OUTLINES OF CHRISTIAN DOGMA. Crown Svo. 7 s. 6d. 
 HOLY BAPTISM. Crown Svo. $s. (The Oxford Library of Practical 
 Theology.) 
 
 Strange. INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVELATION OF 
 
 ST. JOHN THE DIVINE: Being an attempt to make this book 
 more intelligible to the ordinary reader and so to encourage the study 
 of it. By Rev. CRESSWELL STRANGE, M.A., Vicar of Edgbaston, and 
 Honorary Canon of Worcester. Crown Svo. 6s.
 
 IN THEOLOGICAL LITERA TURE. 
 
 Strong. Works by THOMAS B. STRONG, B.D., Student of Christ 
 Church, Oxford, and Examining Chaplain to the Lord 
 Bishop of Durham. 
 
 CHRISTIAN ETHICS: being the Bampton Lectures for 1895. 8vo. js.ftd. 
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF THE REAL PRESENCE. Crown 8vo. y. 
 
 Tee. THE SANCTUARY OF SUFFERING. By ELEANOR 
 TEE, Author of 'This Everyday Life,' etc. With a Preface by the 
 Rev. J. P. F. DAVIDSON, M.A., late Vicar of St. Matthias', Earl's Court. 
 Crown 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 Williams. Works by the Rev. ISAAC WILLIAMS, B.D. 
 
 A DEVOTIONAL COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL NARRA- 
 TIVE. Eight Vols. Crown 8vo. $s. each. 
 
 THOUGHTS ON THE STUDY OF THE 
 
 HOLY GOSPELS. 
 A HARMONY OF THE FOUR 
 
 EVANGELISTS. 
 OUR LORD'S NATIVITY. 
 
 OUR LORD'S MiNiSTRY(SecondYear). 
 
 OUR LORD'S MINISTRY (Third Year). 
 
 THE HOLY WEEK. 
 
 OUR LORD'S PASSION. 
 
 OUR LORD'S RESURRECTION. 
 
 FEMALE CHARACTERS OF HOLY SCRIPTURE. A Series of 
 Sermons. Crown 8vo. 5*. 
 
 THE CHARACTERS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. Crown 8vo. y. 
 
 THE APOCALYPSE. With Notes and Reflections. Crown 8vo. $s. 
 
 SERMONS ON THE EPISTLES AND GOSPELS FOR THE SUN- 
 DAYS AND HOLY DAYS. Two Vols. Crown 8vo. 5*. each. 
 
 PLAIN SERMONS ON CATECHISM. Two Vols. Cr. 8vo. & t^ch. 
 
 Wilson. THOUGHTS ON CONFIRMATION. By Rev. R. 
 J. WILSON, D.D.. late Warden of Keble College. i6mo. is. 6d. 
 
 Wirgman. Works by A. THEODORE WIRGMAN, B.D., D.C.L., 
 Vice-Provost of St. Mary's Collegiate Church, Port Eliza- 
 beth, South Africa. 
 
 THE DOCTRINE OF CONFIRMATION. Crown 8vo. 71. 6d. 
 THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF BISHOPS IN THE 
 CATHOLIC CHURCH. Crown 8vo. 6s. 
 
 Wordsworth. Works by CHRISTOPHER WORDSWORTH, D.D., 
 
 sometime Bishop of Lincoln. 
 
 THE HOLY BIBLE (the Old Testament). With Notes, Introductions, 
 and Index. Imperial 8vo. 
 
 Vol. I. THE PENTATEUCH. 251. VoL II. JOSHUA TO SAMUEL. 151. 
 Vol. III. KINGS to ESTHER. 15*. Vol. IV. JOB TO SONG OF 
 SOLOMON. 25*. Vol. V. ISAIAH TO EZEKIEL. ay. Vol. VI. 
 DANIEL, MINOR PROPHETS, and Index. 15*. 
 
 Also supplied in 12 Parts. Sold separately. 
 
 [continued.
 
 24 A SELECTION OF THEOLOGICAL WORKS. 
 
 Wordsworth. Works by CHRISTOPHER WORDSWORTH, D.D., 
 sometime Bishop of Lincoln. continued. 
 
 THE NEW TESTAMENT, in the Original Greek. With Notes, Intro- 
 ductions, and Indices. Imperial 8vo. 
 
 Vol. I. GOSPELS AND ACTS OF THE APOSTLES, sy. Vol. II. 
 EPISTLES, APOCALYPSE, and Indices. 375. 
 
 Also supplied in 4 Parts. Sold separately. 
 
 A CHURCH HISTORY TO A.D. 451. Four Voh. Crown 8vo. 
 Vol. I. To THE COUNCIL OF NIOSA, A.D. 325. 8s. 6d. Vol. II. 
 FROM THE COUNCIL OF NIC^A TO THAT OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 
 6s. Vol. III. CONTINUATION. 6s. Vol. IV. CONCLUSION, To 
 THE COUNCIL OF CHALCEDON, A.D. 451. 6s. 
 
 THEOPHILUS ANGLICANUS: a Manual of Instruction on the 
 Church and the Anglican Branch of it. izmo. zs. 6d. 
 
 ELEMENTS OF INSTRUCTION ON THE CHURCH. i6mo. 
 u. cloth. 6d. sewed. 
 
 THE HOLY YEAR : Original Hymns. i6mo. 2s.6d.adis. Limp,f>d. 
 ,, WithMusic. Editedby W. H. MONK. Square 8vo. <\s- *>d. 
 
 ON THE INTERMEDIATE STATE OF THE SOUL AFTER 
 DEATH, yzmo. U. 
 
 Wordsworth. Works by JOHN WORDSWORTH, D.D., Lord 
 Bishop of Salisbury. 
 
 THE EPISCOPATE OF CHARLES WORDSWORTH, D.D., D.C.L., 
 Bishop of St. Andrews. With Two Portraits. 8vo. 15*. 
 
 THE HOLY COMMUNION: Four Visitation Addresses. 1891. 
 Crown 8vo. y. 6d. 
 
 THE ONE RELIGION : Truth, Holiness, and Peace desired by the 
 Nations, and revealed by Jesus Christ. Eight Lectures delivered before 
 the University of Oxford in 1881. Crown 8vo. ys. 6d. 
 
 UNIVERSITY SERMONS ON GOSPEL SUBJECTS. Sm. 8vo. zs. 6d. 
 PRAYERS FOR USE IN COLLEGE. i6mo. u. 
 
 10,000/9/1900. 
 
 Printed by T. and A. CONSTABLE, Printers to Her Majer.ry 
 at the Edinburgh University Press.
 
 University of California 
 
 SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 
 
 305 De Neve Drive - Parking Lot 17 Box 951388 
 
 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095-1388 
 
 Return this material to the library from which it was borrowed.
 
 University of Ci