f^f^^:\m ^^^ t^^^M mmm l^^-r-y^la mmm ^^M ^^^^S ^^^^ ^^p^ '^S^^m ;*':a.: I ^O^ HI lueam MamOBSul f.^HL ^Sjj^ jl m ^^ ■ml ^mnnK/ ^Ph W^^^> *^^^R'''b K fl^' ^n ^jbBL^ •■^mijn; ^ p> ""J^^T^^H^ ■ r^l ^L ^ V-y^^rT 1 S^i ' •'^sS W ^^^ ^KaL^rilra 11.;- A.* . OGDEN - - ■*■ --^ -- ^ . ^\;h'^<^ THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES CRITICAL REMARKS ON THE BOOKS OF JOB, PROVERBS, PSALMS, ECCLESIASTES, and CANTICLES.. Bv D. DURELL, D.D. Principal of Hertford College, AND Prebendary of Canterburv. ^nv; OXFORD: PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRESS. M DCC LXXH. Imprimatur, N. Wetherell, ' Vice - Can. O x o n, Univ. CoLt. Oxon. Feb, 14. 1772. i[;i'i :^oa TO THE RIGHT REVEREND ,1^^ '^ ROBERT, LORD BISHOP OF OXFaRD, THESE CRITICAL REMARKS ON THE POETICAL BOOKS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. WHICH HIS LORDSHIP HAS MOST EMINENTLY ILLUSTRATED IN HIS ACADEMICAL LECTURES, ARE, WITH THE GREATEST RESPECT, HUMBLY INSCRIBED BY THE AUTHOR. ,a aiiu : i.. ;] a :^ Q T ;i :> e \: { ' ) PREFACE. N.B. In all the References here adduced I fliall confine myfelf to the XXX firll Chaptors that occur: Job.X.2i,2z. XIII.14. XV. 19. XVII. 6. XXL ^3. XXIV. 18, 19. XXYI. 5. ' VI. 16. VIII. 17. IX. 3. XIII. 25,27. XIV. 18. XVI. 14. ■■ lU. 8. V. 4, 26. VI. 19. VII. 19. IX. 33. XV. 26. XXX. 4. ' VI. 6. IX. 9. XI. 6, 12. XIV. 14. XXVII. 21. XXIX. 24. ' IV.. 19. V. 5. VI. 14. VIII. 12.. W. 11. XVU. iz. 16. XXI. io. XXIV. 5, 6, 19. vi PREFACE. In determining the Signifcation of the Words., I have made the "Englijh Vei'Jion, now in Ufe, the Standard. In the principal Places which 1 judged to he faulty, I have taken the Liberty to correSl it, or to prefer fame of the other old Englijh Verfions. Thofe I have chiefly ufed are Arch-Bifliop ParkerV Bible, generally known by the Name o/"the Bifliop's Bible, a Folio, dated 1568 ; and that ^to Edition of the Geneva Tranf- latioti, printed by Barker in 1 599 : which lafl, it ought to be noted, is meant when 1 fpeak of the Old Verfion, without Specification. Thefe three Verfions have doubtlefs their peculiar Merit and Demerit j the two 'latter ones efpecially : but which of thefe claims upon the whole the Pre- ference, I jhall not prefume ahfolutely to determine. One would naturally expeSi that the Verfion now in Ufe begun under the Aufpices of James I. would be entitled to this Difiin^ion : when we find that near fifty of the mofl learned Men of this Kingdom were commifiioncd to undertake the Work s ; had, for their Encouragement, Afi'urances of Preferment ^ ; and took due Time for the Execution: " revifing," as they fay, " what they " had done, by bringing back to the Anvil that which they had hammered', *' and, having ufed as great Helps as were needful, feared no Reproach ** for Slownejs, nor coveted Pratfe for Expedition^'' The chief Excel- lency of this Verfion confijis in being a clojer Tranfiation than a7iy that bad preceded ; in ufing the proper ejl Language for popidar Ufe, without Aff'etJatiGn of Sublimity, nor yet liable to the Charge of Vulgarity of Exprejfion. It has likewije obferved a due Medium between the Genevefe and Romifli Verfions ; equally avoiding on the one Hand the Scrupulofity of the Puritansy who prefer their new Terms, fuch as Wafliing and Congregation, to the old ecclefiafiical ones, Baptifm and Church j and on the other Hand the Obfcurity of the Papifis, in not tranfiating fuch Words as Azymes, Holocauft, Prepuce, Pafchc, ^c. ^ But, notwith- fianding thefe Concefiions in it's Favour, it certainly does not exhibit in many Places the Senfe of the Text fo exactly as the Verfion of 1599 ' : and miftakes it befides in an infinite Number of Infiances. Frequently it exprejfes not tlxe proper SubjeSl of the Sentence " ; and adheres at other Times fo clofely to the Letter as to tranfiate Idioms °. // arbitrarily gives new Senfes to Words ° ; omits ' or fupplies them without NeceJJity *" * thefe lafi are indeed difiinguifl^ed by another Character -, but very unfa- PREFACE. vii vourable Inferences, either to the Genutnenefs of the Text, or to the Na- ture of the Hebrew, mujl thence be drawn by a Reader unacquainted with that Language. It is deficient _ in refpeSi to the JJjort explanatory Notes ' in the Margin, which abound in the lafl mentioned Verjion. The Words are at Times fo tranfpofed as to create an Hyperbaton ' ; or are not fufficiently varied '. And, to fum up all, it has this Fault in common with the other, that it may jujily be quefiioned, whether any pojjible Senfe can by fair Interpretation be deduced from the Words in not a few Places ". This Verfion was frjl publijhed in the Tear 1 6 1 1 ; and at the Be- ginning of this Century received confiderable Improvements from Bijloop Lloyd, who, among other Things, added the Mr a throughout in the Margin, with Tables of Chronology, of Coins, Weights and Meafures "". In the Year 1745 Dr. Paris at Cambridge revifed the whole, with a vi^,w to dijiinguijli in it by other CharaSlers the Words which were not in the Original ". In this Univerfity we have lately gone farther, by improving in the fame refpeB on the Cambridge Plan, by framing a new AhJiraSi of each Chapter, by a new Divijion of the Paragraphs, and by infer ting in the Margin fome new References, and the Explanation of Hebrew Words. But notwithflanding it mufl fiill be confeJJ'ed, that thefe and f- 'milar Improvements can be deemed at befl but fuperficial ; forafnuch as. they do not penetrate to the Siibjlance, or Jirike at the Root of the Evil. No Individual, however, nor any Society can prefume to go farther, till the great Council of thefe Realms pall think it expedient to delegate the- important Charge of a tiew Tranjlation to Men of approved Learning and Judgment. In the meantime, hoping this very defirable Period may not be far dif tant, I have thought it my Duty to lay before the Public fome Part of the Materials which have lain by me for a cotifiderable Time. My Motive ■ for fo doing, is, that they may be duly weighed in the Interval, in ord^r that if they meet with Approbation they may be ferviceable on that Oc- cafion ; and that others, blefjed with greater Abilities and Advantages,, may hereby be induced to purfue the fame Courfe. But before I quit the Subject, may I be permitted to fubjoin at the Clofe fome few Obfervations, neither I hope foreign to. the Purpofe, nor yet ' The following are all that occur, v-.'-hcn there ought to be at leaft as many Scores, f""a. IV. 9. VI. 3, 29. VII. 7, 8. XII. 13. XXI. 17. XXII. 21. XXIII. 10. XXVII. 3. > Com- pare XXIV. I. and XXVIL 2,3,4. with the Text. ' III. i^. XXV. 6. XXX. 11. ° V c VI. 7. VIII. 17. XII. 5. XVIU. 13,15. XXI. 24. XXII. 30. XXVI.5. XXVII. n, 15. XXX.2. * See the Folio Bible printed 1702. * This appears by a Series of Letters written aiul communicated by Arch-Biihop Seeker to the Author. impertinent ?: nu PREFACE. imper tine fit f It has been ajked for Injiance, Whether the prefent Mr a could furnij}} a proper Number of Perfons better qualified for this Under- taking than the Beginning of the lafi Age. I do not hefitate in replying in the ajirmative. There was indeed a "Time, about the Middle of the lajl Century, ivhen Orie?ital Literature very eminently foiirified in theft Kingdoms, and was almoji carried to it's utmojl Degree of FerfeBion by thole Jlnning Lights, the Waltons, the Pocockes, the Caftles, the Clarices, and others. Thefe would undoubtedly have approved themfelves to have been greater Maflers by the Execution of the Tafk : but the Anarchy, which then prevailed, was not a Time favourable to the Under- taking^ ; // was however produSiive of a more extenfive public Good, by cccafoning the Publication of the Original Text, with all the ancient Verfons of the Eajl ; a Work, which has done more Credit to this Nation than any other ProduSlion of the Englilh Prefs. But, to return to the ^ejlion ', thofe who will not grant the Superiority to the prefent Gene^ ration, will, at leaf, furely allow an Equality ; and mufl withal ac^ knowledge, that we are pojjeffed of Advantages, to which thofe of a for- mer Age were utter Strangers. Befides the Polyglot not then exifing, feveral old Eafern Verfons not known, to fay nothing of the MSS. of the Text not thought of-, there have fnce appeared a great Number of judicious Critics in the different Parts of Europe, who either profeffedly writing on the Subjc£l, or only incidentally (as Cbronologers, Natural Hiforians, Travellers, and others,) have thrown great Light on the facred Reccrds. Thefe Helps would indubitably not be contemned by the approved Tranfator ; who, befides his more general Acquaintance with univerjal Science, would be free from the Shackles, which not long fince confned the Opifiions of all the learned (not excepting the great Pococke himj'elf) in refpeB to the Integrity of the Hebrew Text. Is it pretended that the Times will not bear a new Verfion ? I anfwer by another ^efiion. Is the Temper of the People of thefe Days totally different from that of their Ancejiors, at the Dijlance affix Generations? On the IntroduBion of the prefent Verfion into our Churches in the Year \b\\, we read of no Tumult, Clamour, nor D if content. The Jame pa- cific Difpojition prevailed in the Reign o/"Q^Elizabeth j when more than one new Tranflation received the royal SanSlion. To afcend higher, would be as unnecefary, as to controvert the Axiom, that fimilar Caufes always produce fimilar EffeSls. The godly, the learned, the ingenuous, would doubtlefs rejoice-, the gay, the thoughtlefs, the voluptuous, would Jlill con- tinue uninterefied and unaff'eBed : but the Caviller, the Sceptic, and the Dcifi, would hereby find the fharpefi and mofi trufiy Arrows of their fluiver PREFACE. IX ^her Man fed; and the. illiterate Vulgar, who always depart reluclantly from old Injlitutions^ would foon be reconciled ; when, inftead of an In- "uafion of their Property, they experienced that the old debafed Coin was only called in, in order that they might be repaid in new, of true Ster- ling Value. The Minds of the People cafinot hereby be unfettled. All the leading Articles of Religion will remai?! undijlurbed ; neither will the Ground of their Faith or Pra£lice be ever fo remotely affedled. If there be any Foundation for this Plea, it feems to me (with due Deference to Go~ vernment may I be underfood to hint it !J to be derived from the Legif lature itfelf; which, in it's ABs of perpetual Duration, does not appear to allow fuficiently for the Mutability of Human Affairs, or the Changes incident to Time : whereas were it eyiaBcd, that thefe ASls JJ.wuld all be revifed at the Dijlance oj half a Century, ?na7iy of the Inconveniences complained of would ?io longer exijl, and the almof facred Veneration the People have for Things, which not their Merit, but Antiquity alone, has confecrated, would gradually fubfide, and leave no Traces in their Minds '' . But juay not the Eagernefs for Reformation carry Matters to too great a Length ? Innovations, it is confeffed, are often dangerous ; a?2d the Spirit of Zealots, the mojl uncontroulable of ajiy other : but in this Cafe, the Bounds would be clear and dijlin^ ; and there would be no Caufe to fear, when the CommiJJion exprefsly fet forth the Limits of it's Ex- tent, that cool and difcreet SubjeSls would overleap them. But, to give the Argument it's full Scope ; Would the Innovator herewith rejl fatis- fed ? Would he Jtot defire after this a Revi/al of the Liturgy, with the XXXIX Articles ; and proceed from ecclefiajlical , to civil. Matters f* Thefe are not neceffary, perhaps not probable, Confequences : but allow- ing they were ; what nobler ObjeB could the Parliament, could the Con- vocation, have under their Contemplation, than the Petitions of ferious and well difpofed Men ; prefented, at proper Intervals, with becoming Humility ; praying, not to be releafed (as in a late Infance) from the Bands by which Society is united, but that Means might be dcvifed the jnojl efficacious for quieting their confcicntious Scruples, and fetting them forward in the Way of religious Improvement ? Lajily ; How is this Motion to be made, and who will undertake it ? If the Convocation fate, it ought perhaps to originate there. But, if it y Sir William Blackftonc (hews clearly the Dcfefls in our Criminal Law; and the Inconve- niences it labours under, from Want of the new Statutes being referred by the Icgiflative Power to the learned Judges before they are enafled ; and afferts that the Mifchief complained of would be remedied, wtr^ a Committee aftohited Lut once in an hundred Yean it nrife tbcm. Com- ment. B. IV. C. I. b were X PREFACE. nvere not judged expedient to apply to the Sovereign to convene the Hotifes for that Purpofe, the venerable Bench of Bijhops might eafily agree among themjelves, to take an Opportunity in the Vifitation of their refpeSlive Diocefes, to colleB the Sentiments of the Clergy, [and of fome of the Laity too perhaps,) on this Point : and, as the general Report fit is prefiimed) could not hut be favourable, any one of their Lordjhips after- wards making the Motion, his Majejly having previoufy coufented, an Avl would mofi probably be obtained, without a fngle Divifion in either Part of the Senate "". But to return to my SiibjeB ; (from which an honefl, but perhaps too ardent Zeal has infeifibly carried me too far ; and for which I mtijl again beg Leave to apologize to all concerned :J it fioidd be here objerved, once for all, that in the following Remarks it has been thought fiifficient to point out perhaps only in o?ie Inftance the Setfe of fome particidar Appellatives, as S^^f::; -, which generally fgnifies the Grave, or lower Regions of the Earthy though almojl co??flantly rendered Hell in our Verfion : that as my Defgn was not to appear in the Light of a profeffed Commentator or Paraphrafl, 1 have jeldom touched on thefe Provinces, but where the Reading propofed by me feemed to require it. Laflly, I doubt not but fome of my Obfervations may have been anticipated by other Critics, as many are fufficiently obvious : but, if that be the Cafe, it is more than is come to my Knowledge ; for I have piir- pofeiy avoided having Recourfe to fuch Authors, except perhaps in .fome per- plexing Places, that my Remarks might be my own. Such, however as the Public is already in PoffeJJion of, have doubtlefs no Pretefifwns to Novelty : they have neverthelefs the Advantage of being frefl), indepejident , and u?i- biafed Evidences in Support of Truth. I cannot conclude without publicly acknowledging my Obligations to my Friend, Mr. Blayney, Fellow of Hertford College ; whoje Labour, "Judgment, and Accuracy in the Edition of the Oxford Standard Copy of the Bible have done him great Honour. He has been fo kind as to revife with clofe Attention my MS. Copy ; and to him I am indebted for the Correal io7i of fever al Mijlakes, and for many important Remarks, and judicious Emendations in every Part of this Work. ^ As Dr. Kcnnicott'% Collation is faid to be in great Forwardncfs, it may perhaps be thouglit convenient to wait for the Publication before any fuch Meafure be taken. CRITICAL REMARKS ON THE BOOK OF JOB. Chapter I, Verse 5. — (tnJ off'ered Burnt_ Offerings according to the Number of them all : D^^D -iDD^ Tshv nVj^m ] There is no Occafion to exprefs according in another Chara(fler j for liDD.'a is compounded of the Prepofition 0, which here fignifies according, and "iDD Nurnber. See Noldius' Concordance. D. 32. V. 1 1. — and he will curfe thee to thy face. "jD-in» TJ£) "iV vh D{< } Our Verfion takes no Notice here of the compounded Particles K*? DN, except in the Margin, where they are rendered if not, which is not their Senfe in this Place : they ought to be rendered truly, or indeed, as they are Numb. XIV. 35. Jofliua XIV. 9. &c. ^. might not this Place be tranflated thus — And will he then indeed bless thee TO THY Face, or, bid thee Farewell ? See alfo Ch.II. v. 5. &9. V. 14. — T^he Oxen were plowing, mLTin VH 1p:3n] ")pn is here ufed, as in fome other Places, colleftively : but cannot agree with m::'in, on account of the Difcord of Number and Gender. TWT^ fignifies here A Wood, or Forejl, as 1 Sam. XXIII. 15. This Place A therefore ^ CRITICAL REMARKS ON therefore ought to be rendered — The Oxen were In the Woods. What follows confirms this Senfe — the Ajjes were feeding by the Side of them. V. 2 1 . — Naked came I out of my Mother s Womb, and naked fiall I return thither : r^'y^ :nL^^X D"iyi — ',t:K l^no 'n V Diy ] Our old Verfion has here this Note, viz. " that is, into the Belly of the Earth, " which is the Mother of us all." Others, who take the Words in the Proper Senfe, fuppofe Job to have pointed to the Earth. But, with- out having recourfe to that Figure or this Hypothefis, may not thefe Words, without Violence, be rendered — Naked came I out of MY Mother's Womb, and naked shall I depart with Desolation ? noiy has this Senfe Ifa. XXIV. 12. and feems parti- cularly fuitable here to Job after all the Difafters which had juft be- fore happened to him. The Targum has here — ^*n"n:lp n'^?, to the Houfe of the Grave : and this may probably be the Senfe here ; for Job (Ch.X. 19,) puts the Grave in Oppofition to the Womb, viz. — " I Ihould have been carried from the Womb to the Grave." Chap. II. V. 5. — a}id he will curfe thee to thy Face. -]Dni' "I'JD Sj< N*? DN ] See Ch. I. v. 11. V. 9. — curfe God, and die. nDT O'nSx 1"li] The Verb l^n in Chaldee, and in Arabic, is ufed for taking Leave or bidding Fare^vell ; and ought I think, to be thus rendered here. V. 12. — and ^fprinkled Dufi upon their Heads toward Heaven. J nO'CwH Dn'I^'N"! ^7^ "iCy 1p*lT'l] This Place would be more intelligible, were it rendered, and threw Dust through the Air upon their Heads. See Adls XXII. 23. where this Cuftom is alluded to. Chap. III. V. 3 . — and the Night in which it was faid, There is a Man Child conceived. ', -1:1: Tr\n lOK nVbm ] %• ought not the Text to be read thus — "ICNH b'bm — and the Night which said, a Man Child is brought forth ? For hh is pf the Mafculine Gender ; and n is here more neceffary, confidered as articular and relative, than as paragogic. THEBOOKOFJOB. 3 paragoglc. If it be objefted that it is too bold a Figure to make the Night fpeak, I anfvver that it is not bolder than to vvifli the Day to perifh j which fl:ri