BR {(0 K3 UC-NRLF B M 5QS ^Db ®ljr Imurrsttg of GUjtrago FOUNDED BY JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER The Psychology of Oriental Religious Experience A STUDY OF SOME TYPICAL EXPERIENCES OF JAPANESE CONVERTS TO CHRISTIANITY A THESIS PkESENTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF ARTS AND LITERATURE THE GRADUATE DIVINITY SCHOOL (RELIGIOUS EDUCATION) BY KATSUJI KATO Sllie Qlol'egitrte jjjrrss GEORGE BANTA TUBLISFING COMPANY MENASHA, WISCONSIN 1915 ®h? ImnerHttg of GUjtraga FOUNDED BY JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER The Psychology of Oriental Religious Experience A STUDY OF SOME TYPICAL EXPERIENCES OF JAPANESE CONVERTS TO CHRISTIANITY A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF ARTS AND LITERATURE THE GRADUATE DIVINITY SCHOOL (RELIGIOUS EDUCATION) BY KATSUJI KATO SUje Collegutie Press GEORGE BANTA PUBLISHING COMPANY MENASHA, WISCONSIN 1915 •BR l/o Copyright 1915 by Katsuji Kato Chicago, Illinois QC * ANALYSIS Chapter I Introduction 1 The Statement of the Problem 1 2 The Method of Investigation 3 3 A Survey of the Field 5 Chapter II The Religious Life of the Japanese 1 The Japanese Mind 11 2 The Religiosity of the Japanese 12 3 The Religious Beliefs of the Japanese 14 Chapter III The Psychology of Conversion 1 The Definition of the Term 20 2 The Religious Training of the Japanese Converts 20 3 The Intellect in Conversion 32 4 Social Processes in Conversion 39 5 Conversion as a Psychological Crisis 46 6 Rebirth as the Post-Conversion Experience 52 Chapter IV Theoretical Deductions 1 The Psychology of the Christian Apologetics 58 2 The Supernatural Element in Conversion 66 3 A Psychological Criterion of Morality and Religion 72 Chapter V Practical Deductions 1 A Problem in Christian Missions 80 2 Religious Education of the Japanese 87 Chapter VI Conclusion and Summary 94 355:j6-i THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ORIENTAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE : A STUDY OF SOME TYPICAL EXPERIENCES OF JAPANESE CONVERTS TO CHRISTIANITY CHAPTER I Introduction 1. the statement of the problem Individuality in ethnic as well as in personal experience seems to have been recognized by various writers in the psychology of religion. Thus, after a detailed and original study of the religious experience of some remarkable individuals, James was forced to raise an important question as to individuality in religious experience: "Ought it to be assumed that in all men the mixture of religion with other elements should be identical? Ought it, indeed, to be assumed that the lives of all men should show identical religious elements? In other words, is the existence of many religious types and sects and creeds regrettable?" 1 To this question he offers a decidedly negative answer, for he has found at least two opposing temperaments involved in the psychological analysis of the religious consciousness. With reference to the child's capacity for religion, Ladd says, "Tribal and racial differences appear, although in a somewhat vague and baffling way, as we study the subject from the points of view of ethnology and comparative psychology. Indeed, the capacity for religion is a function of race-culture; and race-culture is itself profoundly modified by the degree and kind of religious develop- ment which, at any particular time, enter into it." 2 The same motive is voiced in Tawney's suggestion of two lines of investigation as to the time of conversion, viz., first, an elaborate series of investigations car- ried out in different lands among persons of different religious belief for the purpose of comparing the religious experiences of people in different countries, climates and civilization; and secondly, a series of investigations carried out by teachers and ministers of different persua- sions in Christian countries for the purpose of determining the times, the conditions and the nature of conversions to Christianity, and to other types of religious conviction. 3 Baldwin also argues for the neces- 1 Varieties of Religious Experience, London, 1902, pp. 486 f. 2 The Child and Religion, edited by Th. Stephens. New York, 1905, p. 150. Cf. also J. R. Angell: Chapters from Modern Psychology, New York, 1912, p. 237. 3 G. A. Tawney: "The Period of Conversion," Psychol. Rev., Vol. XI, pp. 210-216. 2 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ORIENTAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE sity of studying the variety as well as the unity of religious experience; 4 and such studies as given by Begbie 5 are important contributions to the psychology of religion in this respect. From the unanimous opinions of these writers it seems evident that a clear understanding of the psy- chological grounds for the existence of individuality aids us materially in explaining many perplexing problems both theoretical and practical. The mind of man, wherever we happen to meet it, manifests uni- form possibilities and is practically the same in its essential nature, and yet the physical and social factors of a race mould its mentality in the matrix peculiar to itself as distinguished from that of other races. The characteristics thus brought into prominence may be designated as "ethnic individuality" which usually forms the basis of all scientific discussion pertaining to any given race and furnishes us with the point of departure in our attempt to analyse any human behavior religious or otherwise. Thus, M. Taine, 6 in his psychological interpretation of English literature, was compelled to begin his treatise with the ethnic traits of the Saxons, as determined by their geographical and atmos- pheric conditions, and the same motive defines the problem of the present thesis. We aim at the psychological interpretation of the phenomenon of conversion and various phases of religious experience attendant upon it, as seen in a group of arbitrarily selected Japanese Christians who, in many cases, had been brought up in a non-Christian environment. Our attempt is, therefore, intended to be a contribution to the general subject of the variety of religious experience and its bearing upon a few practical problems. That such an investigation is imperative both from the standpoint of the theoretical psychology of religion on the one hand, and that of the practical problems of missions and religious education on the other, needs no elaboration. The failure to recognize the importance of the problem has led many students of comparative religion to unnecessary confusion and inadequate generalization; and the disregard of its princi- ples in the practical propaganda of the Christian religion has caused many missionaries to wonder at their meagerly rewarded earnestness. 7 4 J. M. Baldwin: Fragments in Philosophy and Science, New York, 1902, p. 327. 6 Harold Begbie: Twice-Born Men, New York, 1909; In the Band of the Potter, New York, 1911; etc. 6 H. A. Taine: History of English Literature, translated into English by H. Van Lann, 1873, pp. 33 S. 7 One of the acutest critics has the following statement, significantly pointing out the fact in question: "One cause of the failure of mission work is that most of the missionaries are entirely ignorant of our his- tory — 'What do we care for heathen records' some say — and consequently estrange their religion from the habits of thought we and our forefathers have been accustomed to for centuries past. Mocking a nation's history? — as though the career of any people — even of the lowest African savage possessing no record — were not a page in the general history of mankind, written by the hand of God himself. The very lost races are a palimpsest to be deciphered by a seeing eye. To a philosophic and pious mind the races them- INTRODUCTION 6 But the saddest of all shortcomings is that many goodly teachers of Christianity, whether professional or voluntary, are woefully ignorant of the real situation and, by imparting the Christian truths in ways obviously unpedagogic, are leading the young into useless labyrinths of exotic dogmas and creeds. Such a situation should no longer be tolerated now that we have every reason to believe that religious educa- tion has some valid principles and methods — not a cluster of sophis- ticated aphorisms, but a decidedly scientific and pragmatic formulation which can be utilized to advantage in the practice of religious education. 2. THE METHOD OF INVESTIGATION The materials that form the bases of our study were accumulated partly from a series of private, confidential conversations carried out between the writer and the subjects, and partly from the biographies and confessions either in print or written upon request. The fact that the materials to which we had access are comparatively limited in number and therefore the conclusions that are drawn therefrom are tentative rather than absolute, needs perhaps no apology. We are to contribute only a portion to that great field of comparative psychology of religious experience. The published biographies and confessions are, with the exceptions of Nos. 7, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15, printed in the Japa- nese language, and the present writer is responsible for all the transla- tion into English. The following is the list of our subjects: 1. Taro Ando, president Japan Temperance Union, who relates the story of his conversion in a small pamphlet entitled, "My Conver- sion Experience in Hawaii," Tokyo, 1910, rev. ed. 2. Kaku Imai, formerly a Buddhist priest, now a Baptist minister in Tokyo, who gives his experience in "Why I Left Buddhism and Be- came a Christian," Tokyo, Christian Literature Society of Japan, 1914. 3. Tomijiro Kobayashi, a Christian manufacturer, whose conversion experience is given by N. Kato in: The Life of Tomijiro Kobayashi, Tokyo, 1911. 4. Torasaburo Koki, a Congregational minister: Christian World, No. 1180. selves are marks of Divine chirography clearly traced in black and white as on their skin; and if this simile holds good, the yellow races form a precious page inscribed in hieroglyphics of gold! Ignoring the past career of a people, missionaries claim that Christianity is a new religion, whereas, to my mind, it is an 'old, old story,' which, if presented in intelligible words, — that is to say, if presented in the vocabu- lary familiar to the moral development of a people, — will find easy lodgment in their hearts, irrespective of race or nationality." Inazo Nitobe: Bushido, The Soul of Japan, 11th ed., New York, 1900, pp. 179 f. 4 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ORIENTAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE 5. Y. Hiraiwa, Bishop of Japan Methodist Churches: Christian World, No. 1183. 6. Mrs. Hirooka, whose article on her conversion is translated by Susan Ballard in The East and the West, Vol. X (1912), pp. 306 f. 7. Hiromichi Kozaki, a Congregational minister, whose experience is printed in a Japanese pamphlet, "My Experiences of Twenty-five Years," Tokyo, 1905. 8. Shunkichi Murakami: Christian World, No. 1183. 9. Yasutaro Naide, an Episcopalian rector: Christian World, No. 1180. 10. Joseph Hardy Neesima, founder and first president Doshisha University, whose religious experience is reported by his colleague, J. D. Davis: A Maker of New Japan, 1894. Also A. S. Hardy: Life and Letters of J. H. Neesima, Boston, 1892. 11. Paul Sawayama, a Congregational minister, whose conver- sion is written by J. Naruse in Modern Paul in Japan. An Account of the Life and Work of the Rev. Paul Sawayama, Tokyo, 1893. 12. Ushio Sugita, a Congregational minister: Christian World, No. 1180. 13. Kanzo Uchimura, editor of The Biblical Study, Tokyo: How I Became a Christian, Tokyo, 1910. Also The Diary of a Japanese Con- vert, New York, 1893. 14. K. Yamamoto, secretary Tokyo Y. M. C. A., whose statement is reported by John DeForest in The Sunrise in the Sunrise Kingdom, rev. ed., New York, 1909, p. 171. 15. Heishiro Yokoi, a scholar, whose experience is described by W. E. Griffis in the Homiletic Review, Vol. LIX, pp. 352 ff. The above is the list of the printed biographies and confessions, but the following are the subjects who have contributed to our study by verbal statements supplemented by their own writings to insure accuracy of thought and its expression: 16. S. M., 29 years, a college student. Graduated from a Metho- dist academy in Japan, and a teacher of English for four years before coming to America. 17. K. Y., 28 years, a theological student. Graduated from an American high school and a college. 18. S. T., 32 years, once a newspaper editor. 19. M. H., 28 years, a college student. Graduated from English Department of Doshisha University. INTRODUCTION 5 20. Y. B., 28 years, a theological student. Graduated from a mis- sion school in Japan. 21. T. U., 31 years, a college student. Once a government official and a teacher for six years. 22. T. H., a theological student. 23. M. Ka., 25 years, a college student. 24. K. W., 27 years, a student in dentistry. Graduated from an agricultural college in Japan. 25. K. T., 29 years, a college student. Graduated from an American high school. 26. H. S., 32 years, a theological student. Graduated from a mission school in Japan and a teacher for eight years. 27. Y. I., 24 years, a college student. Graduated from a mission school; worked in a bank for two years. 28. S. S., 32 years, a theological student. Graduated from a mission school in Japan; assisted Japanese Y. M. C. A. work in Hawaii; an evan- gelist among Japanese in California. 29. Y. O., a theological student. 30. R. H., a theological student. Graduated from an American university. 31. M. K., a college student. 32. H. T., 23 years, a preparatory student. Graduated from a grammar school in America. 33. K. M., 26 years, a college student. 34. Sh. Mu., 25 years, a theological student. Graduated from a mission school in Japan. 35. M. S., 36 years, social and religious worker. Graduated from a mission school in Japan, and from an American theological seminary. 3. A SURVEY OF THE FIELD Before we enter upon the main discussion, it is necessary to review briefly the results of the previous investigators and thinkers on the general subject of religious conversion. The literature, however, is chiefly concerned with the ordinary conversion process, either sudden or gradual, and not particularly with its comparative or ethnic aspect. With the exception of a few writers on comparative religion, our problem has not been worked out adequately from a psychological point of view. 8 8 The religious experience in general, chiefly based upon oriental materials, has been treated by some psychologists. The latest example is that of G. M. Stratton: Psychology of the Religious Life, New York, 1912. A more or less popular treatment of the subject is abundant in missionary literature. For bib- liography, consult W. I. Thomas: Source Book for the Social Origins, Chicago, 1909; also Bibliography in Students and the World-Wide Expansion of Christianity (Kansas City Convention Report of the Student Volunteer Movement, 1914), pp. 671, 696. 6 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ORIENTAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE As to the history of the psychology of conversion as such, we need not go into its details. 9 The fact of conversion is, perhaps, as old as race itself, as may be seen clearly from the religious practices now still extant among primitive peoples, indicative of this interesting phenomenon. 10 Among the ancients, we possess the records of their conversion experi- ences in the writings of Lucretius, Augustine, Justin Martyr, Constan- tine the Great, Jesus Christ, Buddha, Paul, and many others, 11 and more recently we find the cases of John Bunyan, John Newton, Jonathan Edwards and others. 12 The numerous cases of conversion phenomena have hitherto been mainly interpreted by philosophers and theologians from metaphysical and ontological points of view. 13 The study of conversion from a purely psychological standpoint is comparatively a new phase in the history of religions, for as late as in the year 1896, Leuba writes: "It is true that a great deal of historical and philosophical work bearing on the religious problem has been done during the past decades, but no researches, from the standpoint of modern psychology, on the subjective phenomena of religious life have ap- peared." 14 It is with the work of Leuba, stimulated perhaps by G. Stan- ley Hall, that we can directly trace the beginning of the psychological study of conversion. 15 His first article appeared in 1896, in which he 9 For history, consult J. B. Pratt: "The Psychology of Religion," Harvard Thcol. Rev., Vol. I, pp. 430 ff.; E. S. Ames: The Psychology of Religious Experience, pp. 3 ff. ; and F. G. Peabody: "History of the Psychology of Religion," Unitarian Rev., Vol. XIV (1880), pp. 97-109, and 193-211. 10 Cf. article by A. H. Daniels: "The New Life: A Study of Regeneration," Am. J ourn. of Psychol. Vol. VI, pp. 61-106. Some accounts of conversion are found in the Old Testament, viz., Job, Jacob, Samuel, Isaiah. The contention of Carlyle is more literary than scientific. He says, " Blame not the word (conversion); rejoice rather that such a word, signifying such a thing, has come to light in our modern Era, though hidden from the wisest Ancients. The Old World knew nothing of Conversion; instead of an Ecce Homo, they had only some Choice of Hercules. It was a new-attained progress in the Moral Development of man: hereby has the Highest come home to the bosom of the most limited; what to Plato was but a hallucination, and to Socrates a chimera, is now clear and certain to your Zinsendorf, your Wesleys, and the poorest of their Pietists and Methodists." Sartor Resarlus, Bk. ii, Ch. 10. 11 Consult W. A. Heidel: "Die Bekehrung im klassischen Altertum, mit besonderer Beriicksichtigung des Lucretius," Zeits. f. Rel.-Psy., Bd. Ill (1910), S. 377-402. Conversion of Church Fathers is given by James Stalker: "Studies in Conversion," Expositor, Vol. VII (7th Series), pp. 118-125, 322-333, 521-534; Vol. I (8th Series), pp. 549-561; Vol. II (8th Series), pp. 52-61, 173-182. Cf. also article "Conversion" by J. Strachan, Encyc. of Rel. and Ethics, Vol. IV. 12 The actual cases are collected by J. H. Leuba: "A Study in the Psychology of Religious Phe- nomena," Am. Journ. of Psychol., Vol. VII, pp. 309-385. Also W. James: Varieties of Religious Experience, London, 1902. 13 E. g., Pfleiderer: The Philosophy of Religion, Vol. IV, p. 128; Theological Writings of Benjamin Jowett. edited by L. Campbell, New York, 1902, pp. 239 ff. 14 "A Study in the Psychology of Religious Phenomena," Loc. cit., p. 310. 15 Prior to the appearance of this article, there were three articles which might be regarded as being in the field of the psychology of conversion. These are: G. S. Hall: "The Moral and Religious Training of Children." Princehn Rev.,N.S., Vol. IX (18S2), pp. 20-45; W. H. Burnham: "A Study of Adoles- cence," Ped. Sem., Vol. I (1891), pp. 174195; and A. H. Daniels: "The New Life: A Study in Re- generation," Am. Journ. of Psycho!., Vol. VI (1895), pp. 61 193. INTRODUCTION 7 studied empirically the experience prior to conversion and the crisis and the mental state subsequent to such a change. 16 Starbuck published his book on conversion in 1899, in which he expressed his conclusion as to the psychological view of conversion. 17 In another connection he made the statement that "much depended upon temperament", 18 and this has been elaborated by Coe who shows that there is a great individual variation, due primarily to temperamental difference. 19 In the Gifford Lectures at Edinburgh in 1902, James has a lengthy account of con- version, and his psychological explanation is chiefly found in the theory of the subconscious, which to his mind is the sole avenue of human fellow- ship with God. 20 This view of James, however, is combated by Prince who bases his criticism on the change of personality observed in the case of Miss B., which closely resembles that of Ratisbonne, of which James makes mention. 21 Ribot admits the subconscious element in conversion and his conclusion emphasizes what he calls the inversion of values. 22 Granger comes to the conclusion that "conversion is, in its essence, a change of intention; and this may be directed either upon intellectual or upon moral objects." 23 The nature of conversion pro- duced in the emotional subjects is explained by Murisier on the basis of imitation, after a preparation which consists in increasing the sug- gestibility of the subject. 24 The phenomena of conversion and revival are exhaustively studied by Davenport, and his conclusion is that con- version is more incidental than purposive, and that the cases of the so- called lapsed, the backsliders, those who have fallen from grace, are simply the victims of powerful force of suggestion and imitation, and the conversion of these people is not to be taken very seriously. 25 Some- what different from the conclusions of Granger and Davenport is the con- tention of Pratt who regards conversion as taking place spontaneously 18 Loc. cil. 17 The Psychology of Religion, pp. 156 5. The parts of this work had previously appeared in Am- J own. of Psychol., Vols. VIII and IX. 18 Am. Journ. of Psychol., Vol. IX, p. 110. 19 The Spiritual Life: Studies in the Science of Religion, New York, 1900, pp. 109-150. 20 Varieties of Religious Experience, London, 1902, pp. 236-237. 21 "The Psychology of Sudden Religious Conversion," Journ. of Abnorm. Psychol., Vol. I, pp. 52-54. This view of James is also criticized by Irving King: "The Differentiation of the Religious Consciousness," Psychol. Rev. Monog. Supple., Vol. V, No. 4. The operation of the supernatural factor in the subsconcious has been denied by Peirce, Jastrow, and Hall. 22 La logique des sentiments, Paris, 1905, pp. 85 ff. 23 The Soul of a Christian: A Study of the Religious Experience. New York, 1900, p. 77. 24 Les maladies du sentiment religieux, Paris, 1901. 25 Primitive Traits in Religious Revivals, p. 246. 8 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ORIENTAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE and independent of social pressure or even of imitation, and characterizes the process as "a new feeling of communion with a greater life which fills the mind and colors the entire field of consciousness." 26 A very lengthy treatment of the subject of conversion is given by G. Stanley Hall, in which it is viewed as purely spontaneous, — "a natural process of a higher order," as Lipsius would say. 27 In France, Henri Bois of Montauban studied twenty-five or thirty conversions, from St. Paul to those of the nineteenth century, and showed how far theological beliefs would explain the experience of conversion. 28 Gaston Frommel of Geneva is said to have made some observations on the cases of Chris- tian conversion. 29 Tawney agrees with James and Starbuck in the main by adhering to the idea of shifting of the center of gravity in the con- version experience. 30 The mechanism of conversion is explained by Nacke as the reinforcement of past memories by the sudden emotional experience, which is so powerful that it comes to the full focus of con- sciousness, submerging and inhibiting the previously existing ideas, thus completely shifting the point of view of the individual. 31 Begbie, who studied the cases of sudden conversion among the London poor, adopts the Jamesian definition of conversion and says, "It produces not a change, but a revolution in character. It does not alter, it creates a new personality. The phrase 'a new birth' is not a rhetorical hyper- bole, but a fact of the psychical Kingdom." 32 Cutten also agrees with James and insists on the difficulty of endeavoring to isolate it from the rest of the experience. 33 Galloway points out the all importance of feeling as a factor in religious conversion, but he links it to the ideational life. 34 Ames agrees with Starbuck in recognizing the three stages in the process of conversion, quite similar to those found in the case of a person working out a problem under intense pressure. 35 Cornelison thinks that conversion is an effect produced by natural causes, and is not, either in whole or in part, the product of direct supernatural agency, 26 The Psychology of Religious Belief, New York, 1907, pp. 222 ff. 27 Adolescence, Vol. II, pp. 349 ff. 58 Reported by Jacque Kaltenbach: "Psychology of Religion in France," Am. Journ. of Rel. Psychol, and Educ, Vol. I, p. 92. 29 Also reported by J. Kaltenbach, Loc. cit. 30 "The Period of Conversion," Psychol. Rev., Vol. XI, pp. 211 ff. 31 "Zur Psychologie der plotzlichen Bekehrungen," Zeits.f. Rei.-Psy., Bd. I, S. 233 ff . 32 Twice-Born Men, New York, 1909, pp. 17 f. 33 The Psychological Phenomena of Christianity, 1908, p. 235. 34 The Principles of Religious Development, London, 1909. pp. 124 f. 36 The Psychology of Religious Experience, Boston, 1910, pp. 2583. INTRODUCTION 9 is not a miracle in the soul. 36 Hocking says, "Conversion is in part at least the grasping of an idea; such an idea as can thereafter infuse itself with peaceful dominance through the system of conduct and belief." 37 The religious experience of St. Paul at the time of his conversion was studied by Royse who concludes that it was due to his hysterical nature; 38 and Gardiner explains it as being led up to by many experiences and thoughts, and not by sudden mental insight. 39 McDougall attributes the subconscious element in conversion to the experiences which have played upon consciousness in one's previous days, and which once formed essential factors in his knowledge, interest and character. 40 Insisting upon the same principle, Bavinck says, "Conversion which brings us into fellowship with God (i. e., genuine regeneration) never happens immediately, but is always connected with representations and impressions which we have received at some time, shorter or longer, previously. It always takes place in connection with historical Christi- anity, which in one or another form exists before and without us, and now enters into harmony with our own soul." 41 The importance of the previous experience in influencing the conversion experience is again emphasized in the case of Christ himself by Forrest. 42 The age of conversion has been a subject of investigation by many workers in religious psychology, although strictly speaking the enquiry is more physiological in nature than psychological. It, however, has an important relation to the problem of mental development in general, and consequently possesses some degree of pertinence. Lancaster found that out of 598 cases, 518 showed new religious inclination between the ages of 12 and 25, and mostly between the ages of 12 and 20. 43 His average age was 15.6 for boys, and 14.6 for girls. Gulick investigated the class of 526 officers of the Young Men's Christian Association in the United States and Canada, and found that 16.5 was the average age of conversion. 44 Starbuck studied the religious experiences of 776 gradu- ates of Drew Theological Seminary, and found that the largest number was converted at 16, and the average age was 16.4. 45 Coe found the 36 Natural History of Religious Feeling, New York, 1911, pp. 102 (. 37 The Meaning of God in Human Experience, New Haven, 1912, p. 73. 38 "The Psychology of Saul's Conversion," Am. Journ. oj Rel. Psychol, and Educ, Vol.11, pp. 148 f. 39 The Religious Experience of St. Paul, New York, 1911, pp. 31 ff. *° Psychology: The Study of Behavior, New York, 1912, pp. 2191 41 The Philosophy of Revelation. Princeton Lectures, 1909, p. 238. 42 The Christ of History and of Experience, Edinburgh. 1897, p. 288 "Ped. Sem.. Vol. V. p. 95. 44 "Sex and Religion." Association Outlook, Dec. 1897. p. 54. 45 Am. Journ. of Psychol.. Vol. IX. pp. 79 i 10 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ORIENTAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE average age of decisive religious awakening to be at 15.4 for 84 men and 16.4 for 272 members of Rock River Annual Conference. 46 Eby col- lected answers from over 1,500 believers as to the age and time of con- version and found the great majority of cases to occur between 10 and 25, and also more frequently and earlier in girls than in boys, although the maximum age in both is 14. 47 From these and other minor and less known results of investigations, we are led to think that conversion is decidedly an adolescent phenomenon. Nevertheless, it is also true that it is not a single and once-for-all act, but often repeats itself with the advance of years, as Strachan says, "Conversion plays too important a part to be exhausted in a single decision." 48 Conversion taking place in mature age has been recognized in many instances. 49 There is one more consideration before we leave this brief summary of the literature on conversion, and that is the fact of normal religious development. The investigations of conversion have chiefly been based on the sudden and striking cases. This is due to the fact that the gradual type cannot properly be called a conversion, as James would think, or else it is not novel enough to deserve any extended study. But it is commonly agreed that there are cases which show no sudden trans- formation of character and yet the religious experience is equally genu- ine and intense, and the facts and interpretations of sudden conversion are applicable to this type of slow, normal and steadfast religious de- velopment. James himself remarks, " they are as a rule less interesting than those of the self-surrender type, in which the sub- conscious effects are more abundant and often striking Even in the most voluntarily built-up sort of regeneration there are passages of partial self-surrender interposed; " 50 The same note is sounded by Leuba, " in the main, the con- clusions reached by the study of sudden conversion apply with equal exactitude to slowly progressing regenerations." 51 Thus we are to understand that the same principle may be applied in explaining both the sudden and the gradual types of conversion. 44 The Spiritual Life, pp. 43 S . ""Conversion in Relation to the Sunday School," Baylor University Bull., Vol. X, No. 5 (1907) 48 Encyc. of Rel. and Ethics, Vol. IV, p. 107. This fact is recognized by evangelists; e. g., John Watson: The Inspiration of Our Faith, pp. 77 ff. 49 Romanes has a statement concerning this fact: Thoughts on Religion, 6th ed., p. 102, quoted by Strachan, Loc. cit. 60 Varieties oj Religious Experience, pp. 207 f. 51 Am. Journ. oj Psychol., Vol. VII, p. 312. CHAPTER II The Religious Life of the Japanese 1. the japanese mind Between the Japanese mind and the Occidental mind it is frequently questioned whether there is any difference. Volumes have been written by students of ethnic psychology and their answers to this query assume both affirmative and negative forms. The question was recently put forcibly before the reading public by George Kennan who answers it in an emphatic negative. 52 He makes a number of very interseting quota- tions from books written by supposedly competent scholars and observ- ers of the Japanese mind, who emphasize the marked difference in the mental constitutions between the Eastern and the Western people, point- ing out the gulf which is well-nigh impossible to be bridged by mutual understanding. 53 It is true that in many mental traits the Japanese present peculiarities not manifest in the Western mind. It has been repeatedly pointed out, for example, that the Japanese are imitative to an extraordinary degree, that they are deficient in originality, that they lack the logical and philosophical faculties, that they are of senti- mental temperament, that they are quick in sense perception, that they are strong in will power, etc. 54 But we must admit that these traits are not altogether absent in the Occidental mind. Recent experimental results on the psychology of individual difference and of mental types have clearly shown us that there exists a variety of mental traits in any given group of individuals. The curves of distribution of mental traits, in other words, are the same whether they are obtained from a group of Japanese or of Americans. The mere statement of seeming differences between any two groups of people is not in itself an explanation; we must rather seek such explanation by correlating various mental traits in any given race with the environmental factors which are chiefly responsible for the creation of the so-called racial mind. The fundamental assumption, then, in the discussion of the psy- chology of the Japanese mind must not involve any notion of mental ""Can We Understand the Japanese?" The Outlook, Aug. 10, 1912, pp. 815-22. Cf. also Dr. Hamilton W. Mabie's article in the same magazine. 53 These authorities are: W. P. Watson: Japan: Aspects and Destinies, London, 1904; Sir Ian Hamilton: Staff Officer's Scrap-Book; Henry Norman: The Real Japan; Homer Lea: The Valour of Ignor- ance; L. Hearn: Japan: An Attempt at Interpretation; Horace Fletcher: "Home Life in Japan," in the Good Health, Feb., 1910. 54 Cf. G. Verenne: "Essai sur la psychologie ethnique de quellques races asiatiques (psychologie normal)," Arch, intern, d. neurologie, T. I, lOme Ser., pp. 25-40; also A. Marie et G. Verenne: "Notes de psychopathologie ethnique (races jaunes)," Ibid., T. 1, pp. 69-82, 150-162. 12 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ORIENTAL RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE difference which deceives even the most trained observer under the guise of social inheritance. It is undoubtedly true that the mental develop- ment is essentially social and any peculiarities that are found in the social environment will find their counterpart in the psychic life of the people. 55 The validity of our discussion depends upon the distinction we can discern between the social and the mental or rather biological elements involved in the religious experience of the Japanese. From our stand- point, then, the mental inheritance is more or less a constant, a known quantity, while the social inheritance is a variable, an unknown quantity. We must first see that this variable social inheritance exists in the case of the Japanese religious life, and only after such study shall have been completed, are we in position to understand the inheritance of these two elements in one's religious consciousness. 56 Hence, our immediate problem is with reference to the religious inheritance of the Japanese, under whose influence their religious consciousness is given birth and matured. 2. THE RELIGIOSITY OF THE JAPANESE The question of the religiosity of the Japanese has also been raised. The suspicion foremost in the mind of Occidental scholars is as to whether the Japanese are religious in the sense that is ordinarily understood by the term. The full discussion of this subject would lead us too far afield for our present purposes. The solution of this problem seems to depend upon the view of the racial mind which has just been noted. The opinions on this point, however, vary among different writers on the religious life of the Japanese, but the majority of them take the negative attitude in regard to the problem. Chamberlain speaks of the Japanese as "essentially an undevotional people," 57 Munzinger says they are "highly ethical, not highly religious," 58 Walter Denning concludes they are "unable to understand the intense interest taken 55 On this point a notable work is that of Sidney L. Gulick: Evolution of lite Japanese: Social and Psychic, New York, 1903. John Stuart Mill is said to have remarked that "Of all vulgar modes of escap- ing from the consideration of the effect of social and moral influence on the human mind, the most vulgar is that of attributing the diversities of conduct and character to inherent natural differences," quoted by W. P. Watson: The Future of Japan, New York, 1907. 88 The analogy of individual and racial differences is not as conclusive as some may think. It makes one think that such an analogy could be absolutely used, but it has very little weight as we see it stated often, e. g., "It seems that there is a residuum of 'race-mind' not amenable to the power of 'social and moral influences,' and from this might be suggested by the analogy of the dissimilarities of individual mind and character — the probability, namely, that these are 'inherent natural differences' in the mental constitution of races." Watson: Op. cit., p. 207, footnote 87 Things Japanese, article "Religion." 88 Die Japaner, p. 187. THE RELIGIOUS LEFE OF THE JAPANESE 13 by the people of the West in ethical, religious and philosophical ques- tions, '' 59 Pfleiderer is said to have remarked in 1897, "I am sorry to know that the Japanese are deficient in religious nature," 60 Percival Lowell said in connection with Japanese religious practices that 'sense may not be vital to religion, but incense is," 61 and finally an eminent missionary to Japan concludes in favor of the non-religiosity of the Japanese by saying: " Allowing liberal room for exceptions, which certainly exist, the average Japanese is not a man of deep religious conviction Bearing in mind the religious eclecticism which has prevailed in Japan for centuries, the absence, in general, of deep religious convictions causes no surprise; the two are mutually destructive that the religious life, as well as the intellectual life, of the Japanese, is marked by superficiality, is one unfortunate result of the historical development of the religious life of the nation The influence of Confucianism upon the educated class of Japan — that it has had a benumbing influence could only be expected from a system which is, at the best, uncertain as to the existence of a personal Supreme Being, and knows nothing of penitence and mercy. Religious indifference is certainly characteristic of the educated class." 62 Watson's statement in this connection is very significant: "In the end, however, it is clear that the Japanese people are without religion as it is understood in the West. They seem to have the capacity for reli- gious devotion — a capacity universal as the human mind itself, but it fails to envisage objects which Europe would regard as truly sublime, or truly religious — objects, that is to say, truly deserving the service of their religious devotion." 63 This situation, as Watson would explain, is due to the deficiency in imagination which is so important a factor in idealizing the objects of religious worship. 64 From the foregoing opinions on the question of the religiosity of the Japanese, we may wonder if it is possible to find any trace of religious consciousness among them, and if the study of such a phenomenon is at all relevant. It seems clear, however, that the history of religions in Japan unmistakably points to the mental capacity of the Japanese for religious devotion. 65 It may be true that many Japanese have not yet found the truly idealized Supreme Being, because of the lack of imagination, but this will not deprive them of religious devotion. The 59 Quoted by Chamberlain: Things Japanese, p. 258. 60 Quoted by Gulick: Evolution of the Japanese, p. 286. 61 Occult Japan, p. 23. 62 G. W. Albrecht: "Religious Life of Modern Japan," Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. LXII, pp. 13 n*. 63 The Future of Japan, p. 161. M /£i' ,yff "Hj. cm, m 5'7! > IXPR 8 1 " 4 MjTODwnrc m t5'94 « LD 21A-40m-2,'69 (J6057S10J.476 — A-32 General Library University of California Berkeley U.C.BERKELEY LIBRARIES 00^7^2^ **> UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ■ . u^mmhI