Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive 
 
 in 2008 with funding from 
 
 IVIicrosoft Corporation 
 
 littp://www.arcliive.org/details/effectivepublicsOOrobiricli 
 
EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 FREDERICK B. ROBINSON, A.M., Ph.D. 
 
 Professor, Department of Public Speaking:, 
 
 The College of the City of New York 
 
 lasalle extension university 
 
 CHICAGO 
 1919 
 

 ^ 
 
 Copyrighted, 1914, 1015, 
 LaSalle Extension University 
 
CONTENTS 
 
 I. ORGANIZATION 
 
 j^ 1. Introduction — Organization of Ideas 1 
 
 t J. General Plan of a Speech 17 
 
 ^ 8. Purpose of the Introduction 31 
 
 - 4. Purpose of the Introduction (Continued) 49 
 
 * 5. Arrangement of ^Matter in the Body of the Speech 67 
 
 r 6. The Conclusion 85 
 
 II. DELIVERY 
 
 7. Physical Aspects of Delivery 105 
 
 * S. Subjective Aspects of Delivery 129 
 
 III. DETAILS OF COMPOSITION 
 
 T 9. Images and the ]\Iind of the Audience '. . 151 
 
 "^ 10. The Expression of Images — Vocabulary Luihling 171 
 
 — ' 1 1 . Vocabulary Building 193 
 
 -{'"■12. General Ideas or Concepts 211 
 
 13. Arguments and their Presentation 229 
 
 1 4. Inductive and Deductive Arguments 251 
 
 15. Argumentation, Briefing, and Floor Tactics 273 
 
 -^1 (5. The Appeal to Action 291 
 
 IV. PRACTICAL PR0BLE:\IS OF DELIVERY 
 
 17. Speech Material and Its Preparation 311 
 
 4-18. Attention of the Speaker and of the Audience 327 
 
 -^19. Purpose of a Speech 345 
 
iv CONTEXTS 
 
 20. The Expressive Voire 363 
 
 21. Gestures 381 
 
 22. Hygiene for Public Speakers 399 
 
 V. PRACTICAL SPEECH DIRECTIONS FOR 
 SPECIAL OCCASIONS 
 
 23. Practical Speech Directions for Special Occasions.... 411 
 
 24. Practical Speech Directions (Continued) 427 
 
 25. Practical Speech Directions (Concluded) 443 
 
EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 introduction 
 
 Efficiency, What It Is 
 
 Ours is the age of efficiency. Everywhere men are 
 devising the most efficient methods of performing the 
 operations of their callings. Business men seek the most 
 efficient system of filing and bookkeeping, the manufac- 
 turer organizes his labor force and machinery so that 
 every ounce of effort gives the greatest possible return 
 in goods. The railroads are replacing steam with electric 
 power, and surgeons spend many hours planning the best 
 way to remove an appendix in the shortest time. 
 
 Mechanical inventors speak of a machine as efficient 
 when it does its work without loss of power. If a hundred 
 pounds of steam pressure are applied to it, the full 
 hundred pounds are accounted for in valuable engine 
 power. There is no w^aste. Any instrument is efficient 
 when it gets the most work from a given amount of effort. 
 
 When we attempt to apply the idea of efficiency to 
 public speaking, wo find that it is best expressed by the 
 word ''effective." The two words ''efficient" and 
 "effective" have, to be sure, very much the same signifi- 
 cance. ' ' Effective, ' ' however, throws the emphasis a little 
 more upon the tangible result, upon the effect produced 
 by any instrument. Now speech is one of our most use- 
 
 1 
 
2 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ful instruments. It is employed to cany messages from 
 one mind to many otliers. If it carries the message truly 
 and forcefully, it is effective; but if it loses part of the 
 message or gives it in such weak form that it does not 
 impress the other mind at all, it is ineffective. Speech, 
 U then, is an instrument through which one mind works 
 upon others. It ought to be made most effective. 
 
 Effective Speech, Thought, and Expression 
 
 Probably the most remarkable product of nature, in its 
 centuries of evolution, is the human mind ; and the second 
 wonder of the universe is the communication of the 
 thoughts and feelings of one mind to others by means 
 of the voice in speech and by means of the body in ges- 
 ticulation. Each man is limited in the position he may 
 assume in the world by the development of his mind. If 
 he has stored up in it a reliable memory of many experi- 
 ences, if his judgment is well trained, if his ideas are 
 good and his will is strong, then is he a source of tre- 
 mendous power. But to exert it upon others, to make 
 his ideas their ideas, to lead them to accept his judg- 
 ments, and to bend them to his will, his speech must be 
 efficient. It must transfer to others, without loss, the 
 complete creations of his brain. 
 
 Each of us is therefore a source of power. But we 
 are unable to get the full benefit of it unless we can ex- 
 press all our ideas well, '^^^lat good would it have done 
 the American people if Patrick Henry had felt immeasur- 
 able indignation at the wrongs England was heaping 
 upon the colonists, Imt had not been alile to give them 
 eloquent tongue in his famous *'Ap])eal to Arms"? A 
 business manager may kiicnv precisely how he can organ- 
 
INTRODUCTION 3 
 
 ize liis corporation so that the community will benefit in 
 better commodities and the stockholders reap larger 
 dividends; but to put his ideas into operation, he must 
 first, by exposition and argument, win over the board of 
 directors. He must be able to make clear to the proper 
 people what is perfectly clear to him. In short, no argu- 
 ment is necessary to prove that a speaker who wishes 
 to influence others, either in conversation or conference, 
 in court of law or on pulpit or platform, must be able to 
 express his entire thought and purpose by means of 
 speech. 
 
 Natuke of These Lessons 
 
 The object of this course is to develop effective speech. 
 Incidentally the student will be led to improve his general 
 mental hal)its; he will be trained to systematic reading, 
 research, and thought. But the attention will be directed 
 primarily to the organization and delivery of speeches. 
 It would be ridiculous to suppose that a man who needs 
 training in speech-making can become eloquent merely 
 by spending a few minutes a day reading a book on pub- 
 lic speaking in the privacy of his home or office. Speech 
 is an art which can be mastered only by much practice 
 under competent direction. These lessons will give 
 simple explanations of the principles of speech-making 
 and they will outline practical directions for exercises; 
 but the student must do his own practicing ; he must actu- 
 ally make speeches as directed. There can be no doubt 
 that the best way to learn to speak is by daily lessons 
 under the direct, personal guidance of a teacher of the 
 art. But if a student who cannot follow the ideal course 
 will carefully carry out the written directions to be found 
 in these lessons, he ought steadily to improve. If he 
 
4 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 perseveres, there will be no limits to his attainments 
 save those set by his own general capacity. The ancients 
 had a saying which is true, *'The poet is born, but the 
 orator is made." By patient j^ractice, you can make of 
 yourself a successful speaker. 
 
 In order that the student may have a general idea 
 of the development of effective speech, we shall enumerate 
 the broader requirements for success. 
 
 Qualities of Good kSpeakixg to be Developed 
 
 1. Clear .Oi:ganizafion of the ideas in the mind of the 
 speaker is the first necessity. The speaker has an object 
 to accomplish by his speech and he selects ideas and 
 gi'oups them so that they will be best understood and re- 
 tained by the audience which will act upon them. 
 
 3. Retention of the Well-Organized Ideas During De- 
 livery is next necessary. This is related to self-posses- 
 sion, ease, and confidence. 
 
 3. Mastery of Language. — Even though the ideas may 
 be clear and well organized in the mind of the speaker, 
 he must have a large vocabulary and skill in the choice 
 and arrangement of words to express his ideas. 
 
 4. Technical Control of Voice in Speech and of Body 
 in Gesture. — Some men cannot speak for more than a 
 few minutes without becoming hoarse or having their 
 voices "break." Their voices may be monotonous and 
 unexpressive or weak, without carrying power. Their 
 gestures may also be awkward. Such deficiencies must 
 be overcome. 
 
 All these excellencies cannot be attained at once. The 
 lessons begin with the matter of clear thinking and the 
 organization of ideas. 
 
THE ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS 6 
 
 LESSON 1 
 the organization of ideas 
 
 Logical Grouping of Ideas 
 
 Not all tlie ideas wliicli fill our minds are clear. Fur- 
 thermore, tliey are not, as a rule, organized in logical 
 groups. If we wish to use some of them as speech mate- 
 rial, they must be clear and well arranged. When a man 
 plans to make a speech, he draws upon the full stock of 
 his mind, but he carefully tests his information to see if 
 it will have weight with his audience, and he arranges 
 it in the most convenient manner for their understanding. 
 Let us illustrate. If I were to ask you suddenly to tell 
 me immediately all your, ideas about trade unions, a 
 great unorganized number of impressions would seek 
 haphazard expression. You might say: "Labor unions 
 start strikes ; sometimes there is disorder and even blood- 
 shed ; they have walking delegates ; I know a union man 
 who received financial help from his organization wfeen 
 he was ill ; unions try to get more pay for their members ; 
 there is a local chapter of the building trades in my neigh- 
 borhood ; I visited one of their meetings once ; unions try 
 to get an eight-hour day, etc." But if you were given 
 some time for reflection, you would organize your 
 thoughts somewhat as follows : 
 
 1. Wliat labor unions are: They are organizations of 
 
 laborers for mutual protection and improvement. 
 
 2. What they seek to accomplish among their members: 
 
 (a) social improvement, (b) sick benefit, (c) life in- 
 - surance. 
 
6 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 3. What they seek to exact from the employer: (a) 
 
 shorter hours, (b) better pay, (c) better working 
 conditions, such as ventilation, safeguarded ma- 
 chines, clean rooms, etc., (d) exclusion from thv 
 shop of non-union men. 
 
 4. Results of unionism: (a) good results, (b) bad results, 
 
 etc., (c) means they use to accomplish their objects. 
 
 5. Our consequent attitude towards unions. 
 
 Benefits of Grouping Ideas 
 
 Such an arrangement or organization of thoughts does 
 three things. First, it insures a thorough and clear grasp 
 of each idea by the speaker. We often let hazy and un- 
 trustworthy impressions hold sway in our careless think- 
 ing of every-day life. However, if an idea is to be put 
 into an organized plan, the very act of classifying it 
 makes us inspect it more closely. Therefore, careful, 
 organized thinking about a" topic leads to a clearer 
 understanding and approval of every idea involved. 
 Second, the plan puts the speech in an order easy for the 
 audience to grasp and retain. Ideas thrown out ha]j- 
 hazard do not form part of a well-arranged whole ; they 
 are confusing. Certainly all cannot be remembered. 
 Third, the organization helps the speaker himself to 
 stick to his topic and to develop all of it. 
 
 Exercise to Secure Organization of Ideas 
 
 To acquire the ability to organize readily, follow the 
 directions of this lesson most carefully, one step at a 
 Ihne before proceeding to the next. Read the whole 
 h'sson through before you attem])! any of the exercises 
 suggested. 
 
THE ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS 7 
 
 1. Eead this passage from the speech which Henry 
 
 Ward Beecher delivered in Liverpool: 
 
 There are two dominant races in modern history: the Ger- 
 manic and the Romanic races. The Germanic races tend to per- 
 sonal hberty, to a sturdy individualism, to civil and pohtical 
 liberty. The Romanic race tends to absolutism in government; 
 it is clannish ; it loves chieftains ; it develops a people that 
 crave strong and showy governments to support and plan for 
 them. The Anglo-Saxon race belongs to the great German 
 family and is a fair exponent of its peculiarities. The Anglo- 
 Saxon carries self-government and self-development with him 
 wherever he goes. He has popular government and popular 
 INDUSTRY ; for the eifects of a generous civil liberty are not 
 seen a whit more plainly in the good order, in the intelligence 
 and in the virtue of self-governing people than in their amazing 
 enterprise and the scope and power of their industry. The 
 power to create riches is just as much a part of the Anglo-Saxon 
 virtues as the power to create good order and social safety. 
 
 Now^ read it again. 
 
 2. Turn this page over so that you cannot see the 
 
 passage and write in your own words the ideas 
 which Beecher conveyed to his English audience. 
 Do this even though the composition may be very 
 imperfect. 
 
 3. Now read the passage again with this plan in mind. 
 
 Beecher develops three ideas: (1) The character- 
 istics of the Germanic races, (2) the characteristics 
 of the Romanic races, (3) the way the Anglo-Saxon 
 carries the Germanic idea into industry as well as 
 government. 
 
 4. Consulting the following notes, once more write the 
 
 composition, in your own words. The notes are to 
 
8 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKLXG 
 
 help you retain Beeclier's ideas but not his words 
 or forms of expression. 
 I. Germanic Races. II. Romanic Races. 
 
 1. Personal liberty. 1. Love chieftains. 
 
 2. Individualism. 2. Clannish. 
 
 3. Civil and political 3. Absolutism and showj 
 
 liberty. government. 
 
 III. The Anglo-Saxon belongs to the Germanic group 
 and shows its characteristics in industry as well 
 as in government. 
 5. Take the following more general outline. Memorize 
 it and then speak the development. In your oral 
 amplification, do not try to remember words which 
 Beecher used before. Merely keep your three ideas 
 in mind and develop them in the same way you 
 would make clear any thought of your own in con- 
 versation. Outline : 
 
 I. Characteristics of the Germanic Races. 
 II. Characteristics of the Romanic Races. 
 III. Place of the Anglo-Saxons. 
 
 AVlien you make your oral development, it is well to 
 have a real audience. If you could get a group to listen 
 to you, it would be well. Or in conversation with some 
 friend you might refer to the Anglo-Saxons and quote 
 the ideas of Beecher. You might also speak your ideas 
 out loud in a room, by yourself, but Ix'fore a mirror. In 
 this case, do not repeat or make false starts and go all 
 over again when displeased with a word. Go right ahead 
 without a l)reak, no matter how imperfect the perform- 
 ance is. Tli(M-e is no harm in going over the whole orally 
 many times, l)ut it is undesiraWo to l)reak off in the 
 middk'. 
 
THE ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS 9 
 
 Exercise in Original Analysis for Thought Groups 
 
 Read the following i)iiragraplis from Henry W. Grady's 
 "The New South" (delivered before the New England 
 Society, December 22, 1886) and make your own top- 
 ical outline. Then write your own complete expression 
 of these same ideas. Preserve all of these exercises 
 carefully in your notebook. Also practice oral amplifi- 
 cation of a memorizeil outline. Follow directions given 
 in the preceding exercise. 
 
 Under the old regime, the negroes were slaves to the South ; 
 the South was a slave to the system. The old plantation, with 
 its simple police regulations and its feudal habits, was the only 
 type possible under slavery. Thus was gathered in the hands of 
 a splendid and ehivalric oligarchy the substance that should 
 have been diffused among the people — as the rich blood, under 
 certain artificial conditions is gathered at the heart, filling that 
 with affluent rapture but leaving the. body chill and colorless. 
 
 The old South rested everything on slavery and agriculture, 
 unconscious that these could neither give nor maintain healthy 
 growth. The new South presents a perfect Democracy, the 
 oligarchs leading in the popular movement, — a social system 
 compact and closely knitted, less splendid at the surface but 
 stronger at the core ; a hundred farms for every plantation ; 
 fifty homes for every palace and (instead of agriculture alone) 
 a diversified industry that meets the complex needs of this 
 complex age. 
 
 In making your notes, be sure to get the central 
 thought — the contrast between the old South and the 
 new South. In your development, do not make a running- 
 contrast; rather treat the old South fully, di'op it, and 
 then take up the new South for complete treatment. 
 Note the following difficult, running contrast, a form of 
 
10 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 composition which shoukl not be attempted by the inex- 
 perienced speaker. 
 
 Talent is something, but tact is everything. Talent is serious, 
 sober, grave and respectable; tact is all that and more too. It 
 is not a sixth sense, but it is the life of all the five. * * * 
 Talent is power, tact is skill; talent is weight, tact is momen- 
 tum ; talent knows what to do, tact knoAvs how to do it ; talent 
 makes a man respectable, tact makes him respected; talent is 
 wealth, tact is ready money. — From the London Atlas. 
 
 Complete the Discussion of Each Topic 
 
 Such a running contrast is not the characteristic treat- 
 ment of a speaker; it is rather the product of a writer 
 wdio has time to meditate and arrange w^ords — even to 
 erase and rearrange. Most speakers would give a rounded 
 idea of tact first, then a thorough exposition of talent. 
 The contrast might be driven home by a few additional 
 remarks. There are some master speakers wdio might 
 carry the contrast along, but such a task is too difficult 
 for the beginner. His rule should be the clear develop- 
 ment of one idea at a time and an orderly arrangement 
 of those ideas in proper sequence. 
 
 Also, the audience gets more out of the simpler and 
 easier treatment. A speech like the passage above leaves 
 them with the impression that tact and talent are con- 
 trasted and that the speaker accomx^lished a brilliant 
 feat; but they do not carry away a satisfactory notion 
 of the nature of either tact or talent. The development 
 of one idea at a time makes for clearness and force 
 of impression. 
 
THE ORGANIZATION OP^ IDEAS 11 
 
 Develop One Idea at a Time 
 
 Observe, in the following- x)assage from Abraham Lin- 
 coln's Eulogy of Henry Clay (delivered July 16, 1852, 
 in the State House at Springfield, Illinois), that one idea 
 is taken up at a time and developed fully. Furthermore, 
 nothing is introduced which does not contribute to the 
 amplification of the thought under immediate considera- 
 tion. It is just as important to keep out distracting mat- 
 ter as it is to put in that which contributes to the direct 
 expression of the central idea. A star is printed at the 
 beginning of each idea that Lincoln amplified. 
 
 * The spell, the long enduring spell with which the souls of 
 men were bound to him, is a miracle. Who can compass it? 
 It is probably true he owed his preeminence to no one quality, 
 but to a fortunate combination of several. He was surpass- 
 ingly eloquent; but many eloquent men fail utterly, and they 
 are not, as a class, generally successful. His judgment was 
 excellent; but many men of good judgment live and die 
 unnoticed. His will was indomitable ; but this quality often 
 secures to its owner nothmg better than a character for useless 
 obstinacy. These, then, were Mr. Clay's leading qualities. No 
 one of them is very uncommon; but all together are rarely 
 combined in a single individual, and this is probably the reason 
 why such men as Henry Clay are so rare in the world. 
 
 * Mr. Clay 's eloquence did not consist, as many fine speci- 
 mens of eloquence do, of tropes and figures, of antitheses and 
 elegant arrangement of words and sentences, but rather of that 
 deeply earnest and impassioned tone and manner which can 
 proceed only from great sincerity, and a thorough conviction 
 in the speaker of the justice and importance of his cause. This 
 it is that truly touches the chords of sympathy; and those who 
 heard Mr. Clay never failed to be moved by it, or ever after- 
 ward forgot the impression. All his efforts were made for 
 practical effect. He never spoke merely to be heard. He never 
 
12 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 delivered a Fourth of July oration or a eulogy on an occasion 
 like this. * As a politician or statesman, no one Avas so habitu- 
 ally careful to avoid all sectional ground. Whatever he did, 
 he did for the whole country. In the construction of his 
 measures, he ever carefully surveyed every part of the field and 
 duly weighed every conflicting interest. Feeling as he did, and 
 as the truth surely is. that the world's best hope depended on 
 tho continued Union of these States, he was ever jealous of and 
 watchful for whatever might have the slightest tendency to 
 separate them. 
 
 * ]\Ir. Clay 's predominant sentiment, from first to last, was a 
 deep devotion to the cause of human liberty — a strong sympathy 
 with the oppressed everywhere, and an ardent wish for their 
 elevation. With him this was a primary and controlling pas- 
 sion. Subsidiary to this was the conduct of his whole life. 
 He loved his country partly because it was his own country, and 
 mostly because it was a free country; and he burned with a 
 zeal for its advancement, prosperity and glory, because he saw 
 in such the advancement, prosperity and glory of human liberty, 
 human right and human nature. lie desired the prosperity of 
 his countrymen partly because they were his countrymen, but 
 chiefly to show to the world that free men could lie prosperous. 
 
 .Exercise of Amplifying Simple Plans of Speech 
 
 In order to get practice in the amplification of a gen- 
 eral thought by the grouping of subordinate thoughts 
 around it, amplify orally the following outlines — all or 
 such as interest you. It might be well to jot down all 
 your information on the subjects before trying to or- 
 ganize the matter according to the outlines here sug- 
 gested. Then undertake the oral development as de- 
 scribed l)efore. Sul)stitute outlines of your own if you 
 prefer. 
 
 1. Washington was an ideal American gentleman, 
 (a) He was courageous. 
 
THE ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS 13 
 
 (b) He was patient. 
 
 (c) He was courteous. 
 
 (d) He was sagacious. 
 
 (e) He was patriotic. 
 
 (f ) He was unselfish. 
 
 2. The Government should own the railroads. 
 
 (a) The whole people should j^rofit by the use of 
 
 the highways. 
 
 (b) Shippers and passengers would get fairer treat- 
 
 ment. 
 
 (c) Better service would be rendered. 
 
 (d) Money could be made to pay governmental 
 
 expenses. 
 
 3. Government ownership of railroads would be unde- 
 
 sirable. 
 
 (a) Railroading is a private business which should 
 
 be left to the enterprise of individuals. 
 
 (b) Government enteri3rises foster corruption and 
 
 graft. 
 
 (c) There would be no incentive to improve the 
 
 service. 
 
 (d) There would be a deficit which would have to 
 
 l)e met by heavier taxes upon the people. 
 
 4. Labor. 
 
 (a) What is labor? 
 
 (b) The necessity for labor. 
 
 (c) The unpleasantness of labor. 
 
 (d) The blessings of labor. 
 
 Observation and Criticism of the Grouping of 
 Other Speakers 
 
 At the next meeting you attend where someone speaks 
 at length (as in church, political meeting, or club meet- 
 
14 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ing) take notes of the address. Put down the headiHgs 
 or topics which are treated in the address. Then ob- 
 serve how the speaker develops his topics. Does he 
 clearly hold one idea till it is fully expounded! Are all 
 his ideas clear f Do they follow each other in a natural 
 order? AVhat faults in grouping does the speaker have? 
 Is the speech so well organized that you can repeat its 
 essential message in your own words from the notes you 
 take? This criticism of other speakers is a great help 
 toward self -improvement. 
 
 Within the next three or four weeks, if you have the 
 opportunity, prepare carefully a detailed report of such 
 a speech which you heard. Append the outline and your 
 criticism. This exercise is optional. 
 
 General Suggestions 
 
 Get the Habit of Systematic Thouglit. — You must cul- 
 tivate the habit of orderly and systematic thought. 
 Carry this into your daily life. If you read the news- 
 paper, see if the writer of the article you are reading 
 holds to his topic or wanders. Analyze the magazine 
 articles you read. Even in conversation, organize your 
 expressions. If you say that President Wilson was right 
 in delaying intervention in Mexico, be able to amplify 
 thus: — because (a) reason one, (b) reason two, and (c) 
 reason three. Do not have slovenly opinions. Crystal- 
 lize all your thoughts. ' Put them to the test of organiza- 
 tion. 
 
 Indulge in Much Oral Practice. — You nuist indulge in 
 a great deal of oral expression. Speak in large gather- 
 ings whenever the opportunity arises. Always have 
 your thoughts organized ; do not let them come out in 
 
HE ORGANIZATION OF IDKAS 15 
 
 "^ chance order or no order at all. At any rate do niucli 
 oral practice alone. No one ever became an effective 
 speaker without actually speaking. 
 
 Assignment of Work for Five Days 
 
 The written exorcises in tliis entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keej) copies of tlie written exer- 
 cises in your notel)ook. 
 
 First Day. — You have read through the first lesson. Now study 
 it again carefully, mastering its contents. Do not attempt 
 any of the special exercises in the first or second reading. 
 
 Second Day. — Write the exercises in connection with the 
 Beecher speech (p. 7), and criticize carefully your own work : 
 then rewrite it. Practice in your own words the oral re- 
 production of the Beecher speech. 
 
 Third Day. — Do the exercises in connection with the Grady 
 speech (p. 9). Prepare carefull}^ the outline and amplifica- 
 tion of the Grady speech and criticize and rewrite as sug- 
 gested in the work for the second day. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Fill out orally the outlines given which begin 
 with the character of Washington (p. 12). Make similar 
 outlines for matters of current interest which you read ahout 
 and concerning which you have formed opinions. 
 
 Fifllt Day. — Outline and criticize some speech you have heard. 
 Remember that criticism means appreciation as well as 
 adverse comment. 
 
 It is hoped that this lesson has impressed you with 
 the value of organized thought and given you suggestions 
 which will start you in the direction of a better organiza- 
 tion of your own thoughts. The second lesson will take a 
 nominating speech for its model and show how a long 
 speech is made up of certain great divisions, each one 
 of which contains its thought groups. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 liis knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are suggestire merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in tlie 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 I. State what efficienc}'- is. Give tlie best illustration of it 
 you know. 
 
 — 2. Why is effective a better word than efficient to apply to 
 public speaking? 
 
 3. What is the most effective speech you have ever heard? 
 Why? 
 
 4. What benefits of "grouping ideas" are discussed in the 
 lesson ? 
 
 5. AVhat are the four qualities of good speaking the student 
 should develop ? 
 
 6. AVhat is meant by the expression "develop one idea at a 
 time ' ' ? 
 
 7. What does Beecher's paragraph on "The Germanic and the 
 Romanic Races" illustrate as to the grouping of ideas? 
 
 8. What four ideas does Lincoln "develop one at a time" 
 about Henry Clay? 
 
 9. What are the main headings of an address you have re- 
 cently heard ? 
 
 10. In Henry W. Grady's paragraph, what are the chief points 
 of contrast between the Old and the Xew South? 
 
 II. What ideas have you about Clay's eloquence, from Liii- 
 eoln 's paragraph ? 
 
 12. In a conversation about "The kinds of men I work with,'' 
 what would be the main lines of your talk ? 
 
 13. If you desire more practice, outline for a short talk one of 
 the following topics: Workmanship, Reliability, Woman's Suf- 
 frage, High License, Books I Like to Read, My Job, My Em- 
 ployer, My Ambition, 
 
 16 
 
LESSON 2 
 
 THE GENERAL PLAN OF A SPEECH. THE DETAILED 
 
 TREATMENT OF THE ORGANIZATION 
 
 OF A NOMINATING SPEECH 
 
 All but the very simplest messages which we can 
 deliver in a speech are made up of several parts. This 
 was insisted upon in the first lesson when we discussed 
 the proper organization of those parts. A message was 
 considered well organized if the nature of each part was 
 clearly and forcefully presented and the relation of each 
 part to the whole was made evident. Consequently we 
 concluded that it is most necessary that we make a care- 
 ful analysis to determine just how our thoughts hang- 
 together before we try to impress them upon other people. 
 
 The Body of a Speech 
 
 Now let us suppose that you have a message to deliver 
 which summed up is simply this : The Democratic Party 
 ought to nominate Woodrow Wilson for president once 
 more. Upon analysis you discover ten good reasons for 
 this belief. You pass all these reasons in review before 
 you and find that they are well founded. Then you 
 
 17 
 
18 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 organize them so that they Avill form a well-arranged 
 group, easy of comprehension and forceful in its combined 
 strength. An amplification of this will constitute the 
 body of a speech nominating your candidate for the office 
 of president. 
 
 The Introduction 
 
 Yet that does not exhaust all the planning for such a 
 speech, for you do not always wish to plunge imme- 
 diately into the bod^^ of an address. The audience may 
 not be ready to receive it. They may be so unfavorably 
 prejudiced against you that they will not listen to your 
 message till you woo them and win their favor. They 
 may have some preconceived notions against your candi- 
 date or the platform upon which he expects to stand. In 
 fact, a thousand and one untoward circumstances may 
 exist which will make necessary some preliminary efforts 
 to incline them to an impartial hearing of what may 
 be said. This portion of the general speech is called the 
 introduction. Its function is to prepare the way for 
 the most favorable recejjtion of the message proper. 
 There are other things besides prejudice and unfriendly 
 feeling which stand in the way of a good reception of 
 the message, but we shall not enumerate them in this 
 lesson. Whatever they are, the introduction is used to 
 clear them away. 
 
 The Conclusion- 
 
 Besides the introduction and body, a speech may have 
 a third part, the conclusion. The i)urpose of the conclu- 
 
GENERAL PLAN: NOMLNATLXG SPEECH 19 
 
 sion is to gather together the combined force of all the 
 parts of the body of the speech and to drive home or apply 
 them. It has been said that every speech — no matter how 
 long or how short, no matter what the subject or the pur- 
 pose — must have three parts: an opening or introduc- 
 tion, a body or argument, and a conclusion. This is not 
 true, for sometimes the situation is favorable to an imme- 
 diate presentation of the message without preliminary 
 words and sometimes the speaker prefers the audience 
 to draw its own conclusions and to make its own applica- 
 tions. Yet it is well for the student to know the nature 
 and use of all these parts so that he can employ them 
 when desirable. 
 
 We shall later make a detailed study of the intro- 
 duction and conclusion and discuss when they may be 
 omitted. Just now we shall assume that a nominating 
 speech has these initial and terminal parts while we 
 attend primarily to the nature of the material used in the 
 body of the speech. Our study in this lesson will be the 
 organization of the body of a nominating speech. 
 
 Conklixg's Speech Nominating Grant for President, 
 
 1880 
 
 We take as our model Eoscoe Conkling's nomination 
 of General Grant for president, in the Chicago Conven- 
 tion of the Republican Party, 1880. It will be remem- 
 bered that Grant served as president for two terms (1868- 
 1876). He then traveled around the w^orld, visiting all 
 the civilized nations and receiving the homage of the 
 greatest men and rulers of the earth. Mr. Conkling 
 nominated him to run for a third time in the following 
 
20 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 speech. Read the speech slowly and thoughtfully, trying 
 to sense its structure. 
 
 When asked what State he hails from, 
 
 Our sole reply shall be, 
 He comes from Appomattox, 
 
 And its famous apple-tree. 
 
 In obedience to instructions I should never dare to disregard, 
 expressing also, my own firm convictions — I rise to propose a 
 nomination with which the country and the Republican part}' 
 can grandly win. The election before us is to be the Austerlitz 
 of American politics. It will decide, for many years, whether 
 the country shall be Republican or Cossack. The supreme need 
 of the hour is not a candidate who can carry ^Michigan. All 
 Republicans can do that. The need is not of a candidate who is 
 popular in the Territories, because they have no vote. The need 
 is of a candidate who can carry doubtful States. 
 
 Not the doubtful States of the North alone, but doubtful 
 States of the South, w^hich we have heard, if I understand it 
 aright, ought to take little or no part here, because the South 
 has nothing to give, but everything to receive. No, gentlemen, 
 the need that presses upon the conscience of this Convention 
 is of a candidate who can carry doubtful States both North and 
 South. And believing that he, more surely than any other man, 
 can carry New York against any opponent, and can carry not 
 only the North, but several States of the South, Neiv York is for 
 UUjsses S. Grant. Never defeated in peace or in war, his name 
 is the most illustrious borne by living man. 
 
 His services attest his greatness, and the country — nay, the 
 world — knows them by heart. His fame was earned not alone 
 in things written and said, but by the arduous greatness of things 
 done. And perils and emergencies will search in vain in the 
 future, as they have searched in vain in the past, for any other 
 on whom the nation leans with such confidence and trust. Never 
 having had a policy to enforce against the will of the people, 
 he never betrayed a cause or a friend, and the people will never 
 desert nor betray him. Standing on the highest eminence of 
 
GENERAL PLAN: NOMINATING SPEECH 21 
 
 human distint'tion, modest, tirm, simi)le and self-poised, having 
 filled all lauds with his renown, he has seen not only the high- 
 born and the titled, but the poor and the lowly in the uttermost 
 ends of the earth, rise and uncover before him. He has studied 
 the needs and the defects of many systems of government, and 
 he has returned a better American than ever, with a wealth of 
 knowledge and experience added to the hard common sense 
 which shone so conspicuously in all the fierce light that beat upon 
 "liim during sixteen years, the most trying, the most portentous, 
 the most perilous in the nation's history. 
 
 Vilified and reviled, ruthlessly aspersed by unnumbered 
 presses, not in other lands but in his own, assaults upon him 
 have seasoned and strengthened his hold on the public heart. 
 Calumny's ammunition has all been exploded; the powder has 
 all been burned once ; its force is spent ; and the name of Grant 
 will glitter a bright and imperishable star in the diadem of the 
 republic when those who have tried to tarnish that name have 
 moldered in forgotten graves, and when their memories and their 
 epitaphs have vanished utterly. 
 
 Never elated by success, never depressed by adversity, he has 
 ever, in peace as in war, shown the genius of common sense. 
 The terms he prescribed for Lee's surrender foreshadowed the 
 wisest prophecies and principles of true reconstruction. Victor 
 in the greatest war of modern times, he quickly signalized his 
 aversion to war and his love of peace by an arbitration of inter- 
 nal disputes, which stands as the wisest, the most majestic exam- 
 ple of its kind in the world's diplomacy. When inflation, at 
 the height of its popularity and frenzy, had swept both Houses 
 of Congress, it was the veto of Grant which, single and alone, 
 overthrew expansion and cleared the way for specie resumption. 
 To him, immeasurably more than to any other man, is due the 
 fact that every paper dollar is at last as good as gold. 
 
 With him as our leader we shall have no defensive campaign. 
 No! We shall have nothing to explain away. AVe shall have 
 no apologies to make. The shafts and the arrows have all been 
 aimed at him, and they lie broken and harmless at his feet. 
 
 Life, liberty and property will find a safeguard in him. 
 When he said of the colored men in Florida, "Wherever I am, 
 
22 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 they may come also" — when he so said, he meant that, had he 
 the power, the poor dwellers in the cabins of the South should 
 no longer be driven in terror from the homes of their childhood 
 and the graves of their murdered dead. When he refused to 
 see Dennis Kearney in California, he meant that communism, 
 lawlessness and disorder, although it might stalk high-headed and 
 dictate law to a whole city, would always find a foe in him. 
 He meant that, popular or unpopular, he would hew io the line 
 of right, let the chips fly where they may. 
 
 His integrity, his common sense, his courage, his unequaled 
 experience, are the qualities offered to his country. The only 
 argument, the only one that the wit of man or the stress of poli- 
 tics has devised is one which would dumbfounder Solomon, 
 because he thought there was nothing new under the sun. Hav- 
 ing tried Grant twice and found him faithful, we are told that 
 we must not, even after an interval of years, trust him again. 
 My countrymen ! my country^men ! what stultification does not 
 such a fallacy involve? The American people exclude Jefferson 
 Davis from public trust. Why ? why ? Because he was the arch- 
 traitor and would-be destroyer; and now the same people are 
 asked to ostracize Grant and not to trust him. Why? why? I 
 repeat : because he was the arch-preserver of his country, and 
 because, not only in war, but twice as civil magistrate, he gave 
 his highest, noblest efforts to the republic. Is this an electioneer- 
 ing juggle, or is it hypocrisy's masquerade? There is no field 
 of human activity, responsibility, or reason in which rational 
 beings object to an agent because he has been weighed in the 
 balance and not found wanting. There is, I say, no department 
 of human reason in which sane men reject an agent because he 
 has had experience, making him exceptionally competent and fit. 
 From the man who shoes your horse, to the lawyer who tries your 
 cause, the officer who manages your railway or your mill, the 
 doctor into whose hands you give your life, or the minister who 
 seeks to save your soul, what man do you reject because by his 
 works you have known liini and found him faithful and fit? 
 What makes the Presidential office an exception to all things 
 else in the common sense to be applied to selecting its incumbent ? 
 Who dares — who dares to put fetters on that free choice and 
 
GENERAL PLAxX : XO.MINATLXG SPEECH 23 
 
 judgment which is the birthright of the American people ? Can 
 it be said that Grant has used official power and place to per- 
 petuate his termf He has no place, and official power has not 
 been used for him. Without patronage and without emissaries, 
 without committees, without bureaus, without telegraph wires 
 running from his house to this Convention, or running from his 
 house anywhere else, this man is the candidate whose friends 
 Iiave never threatened to bolt unless this Convention did as they 
 said. He is a Republican who never wavers. He and his friends 
 stand by the creed and the candidates of the Republican party. 
 They hold the rightful rule of the majority as the very essence 
 of their faith, and they mean to uphold that faith against not 
 only the common enemy, but against the charlatans, jayhawkers, 
 tramps and guerrillas — the men who deploy between the lines, 
 and forage now on one side and then on the other. This Conven- 
 tion is master of a supreme opportunity. It can name the next 
 President. It can make sure of his election. It can make sure 
 not only of his election, but of his certain and peaceful inaugura- 
 tion. IMore than all, it can break that poAver which dominates 
 and mildews the South. It can overthrow an organization 
 whose very existence is a standing protest against progress. 
 
 The purpose of the Democratic party is spoils. Its very 
 hope of existence is a solid South. Its success is a menace to 
 order and prosperity. I say this Convention can overthrow that 
 power. It can dissolve and emancipate a solid South. 'It can 
 speed the nation in a career of grandeur eclipsing all past achieve- 
 ments. 
 
 Gentlemen, we have only to listen above the din and look 
 beyond the dust of an hour to behold the Republican party 
 advancing with its ensigns resplendent with illustrious achieve- 
 ments, marching to certain and lasting victory with its greatest 
 ^larshal at its head. 
 
 Read the speech again, out loud witli all the enthusiasm 
 you can work up. If possibh?, read it to friends as an 
 example of convention oratory. 
 
 Now let us consider its plan. 
 
24 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 A. Introduction (to the words "grandly win"), merely 
 
 to attract attention; very brief. 
 
 B. Body of the Speech. 
 
 1. The need of the party : to carry doubtful states, 
 will be met by Grant. 
 
 2. The virtues of the candidate. 
 
 (a) He is popular with all classes. 
 
 (b) His travels and studies abroad have im- 
 
 proved him. 
 
 (c) He has risen superior to all criticism. 
 
 (d) His acts show calm, common sense; policy 
 
 of peace ; money policy. 
 
 (e) He makes possible an aggressive campaign. 
 
 (f ) He was the courageous advocate of freedom 
 
 on several occasions. 
 
 3. Objections to him are ridiculous. 
 
 (a) The third-term objection is counter to the 
 
 practice in all walks of life where experi- 
 ence is a recommendation. 
 
 (b) Grant never used the power of place or pat- 
 
 ronage to get this nomination or election. 
 
 C. Conclusion of additional, reenforced enthusiasm. 
 
 1. Grant is the great Republican. 
 
 2. Opportunity of the convention to name a 
 
 president. 
 
 3. Denunciation of Democrats. 
 
 4. Prophecy of victory. 
 
 Tliis speech is not so well organized as it might be, yet 
 it serves very well as a model of enthusiastic nomination. 
 We shall now make a model plan for a nominating speech 
 wliich can l)e filled in on almost any occasion of nomina- 
 tion. AVe nnist call attention to one marked deviation 
 
GENERAL PLAN: N0:\IINAT1NG SPEECH 25 
 
 from Coiikling's plan. As a rule it is best not to name 
 the candidate till well on in the speech. Sometimes it is 
 best to excite curiosity and arouse the audience so that 
 they are in a state of intense expectation when at last 
 you name the man. Conkling did not use this device, 
 because Grant was not a new man and it was well known 
 that Conkling was going to nominate him. But in most 
 cases it is well to describe the ideal man and show how 
 such a candidate will meet the needs of the hour ; then at 
 the climax of the virtues to be expected, name the man 
 who has them all. The plan which we therefore suggest 
 is the following: 
 
 Type Plan for Nominating Speech 
 
 A. Introduction (according to circumstances that arise 
 
 at the time of delivery). 
 
 B. Body of the Speech. 
 
 1. Need of the party, club, or organization. 
 
 2. The general characteristics a candidate should 
 
 have. 
 
 (a) Experience. 
 
 (b) Character. 
 
 (c) Popularity, etc. 
 
 3. The platform he will stand on. What he 
 
 pledges himself to do. 
 
 4. Name him who has all these in the highest degree. 
 
 5. Objections to him, if any, disposed of. Best not 
 
 mention these if they can be avoided. Take the 
 defens'-ve only when it is forced on you by the 
 situation. 
 
 6. Eulogy of the candidate. 
 
 (a) His past record. 
 
 (b) His present renown. 
 
 (c) His excellent qualities. 
 
/ 
 
 J 
 
 26 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 C. Conclusion. Prophecy of success, advancement, or 
 victory with him as the standard-bearer. Lan- 
 guage enthusiastic and treatment rapid. 
 
 Characteristic Features of the Nominating Speech 
 Style 
 
 Notice certain features in the style of the nominating 
 speech which spring from the purpose of the speaker and 
 the occasion on wdiich such a speech is delivered. The 
 meeting is one for quick decision rather than long or 
 careful deliberation. The candidates are not carefully 
 discussed. After one has been named, there is no system- 
 atic testing of all his points of strength and weakness. 
 No one cross-questions the nominator to see if his claims 
 are just ; no debate of a solid character is carried on. 
 So far as speaking is concerned, all that takes place is the 
 favorable naming and eulogizing of several men by their 
 friends. To be sure, there may be some quiet managing 
 on the floor of the convention, but the purpose of the 
 nominating speaker is to bring the delegates to a high 
 point of enthusiasm. He seldom offers proof, for close 
 reasoning is usually incompatible with high excitement. 
 From this it follows : / 
 
 1. The argTiments, if any, must be short and crisp. 
 There is no time for labored demonstration. 
 
 2. Striking statements form the major part of the 
 speech. These must be vivid. Bold figures of speech 
 are allowed. Notice ''Standing on the highest eminence 
 of human distinction, and having filled all lands with 
 his renown," "The ammunition of calumny had all been 
 exploded," ''General Grant's name will glitter as a 
 bright star in the diadem of the Republic," and other 
 sti'iking figures. 
 
X 
 
 GEMiixvAi^ lUAX: XO:\riXATING SPEECH 2'< 
 
 3. The movement must be rapid. 
 
 4. Each sub-topic must be carefully worked out so that 
 no false or blundering step will be made. In this kind 
 of speech, there must be no confusion, repetition, or blur- 
 ring of the brilliant effect. Furthermore, the amplitica- 
 tion of each topic must be in the order of increasing 
 importance. The crowning glory must be named last so 
 as to draw forth applause. Thus the whole speech is a 
 series of smaller climaxes with a great one at the naming 
 of the candidate and a very great one at the end. 
 
 DiEECTIONS FOR ORIGINAL AVoRK 
 
 A. Select one or more of the following subjects for a 
 nominating address. 
 
 1. Colonel Goethals as the first governor of the 
 
 Panama Canal zone; delivered before the 
 United States Senate. 
 
 2. A neighbor of yours as candidate for your party 
 
 for state assemblyman ; delivered before a pri- 
 mary gathering in your district. 
 
 3. A man in the office in which you work for the 
 
 position of general manager ; delivered before 
 the board of directors or other body with ap- 
 pointing power. Make believe you are a mem- 
 ber of the board or are someone else who 
 might properly make such a nomination. 
 
 4. A fellow member of some society to which you 
 
 belong for the position of president or treas- 
 urer, etc. ; delivered before the members of the 
 society. 
 
 5. Theodore Roosevelt for president; delivered be- 
 
 fore the national convention of the Progressive 
 Party. 
 
28 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 6. Any man for president; delivered before the 
 jjroper convention. 
 
 B. Make a note of all the ideas you can gather which 
 
 would contribute material for the speech. This 
 is your available storehouse of subject matter. 
 
 C. Plan the speech by grouping the matter under the 
 
 general heads suggested in our type plan. Ask 
 yourself "Just what points will reach that par- 
 ticular audience!" "What will influence them 
 so that they will agree with me?" Throw aside 
 all that does not meet your needs and arrange the 
 rest as recommended. Later you may vary from 
 the type and attempt an original order, but at first 
 it is best to follow the model form. 
 
 D. In amplifying the various points in the plan, use 
 
 the enthusiastic, nominating style already de- 
 scribed. 
 
 1. Amplify orally with the plan before you. 
 
 2. If you can do it, amplify orally with no notes 
 
 in hand but with the greater sub-topics memo- 
 rized. This must be done sooner or later. If 
 you do not succeed at first, keep on trying 
 Make the sijeech simple with but few sub- 
 divisions. When you can retain such a plan in 
 the memory and develop it orally, then make 
 the next one more elaborate. 
 
 3. Eeduce your amplification to writing. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exercist'^; in tliis entire lesson should he 
 carefully worked out. Keep eopies of the wiitten exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 First Day. — You luive read throuj^h the lesson. Now study it 
 again careCulIy. mastering ils contents. Do not atttMnpt any 
 
GENERAL PLAN: NOMINATLNG SPEECH 29 
 
 of the (.'xercises until after the second reading. Read the 
 Conkling- speech orally. 
 Second Day. — Write a criticism of the Conkling speech. What 
 do you like about it ? Is there anything you dislike ? Why 
 does he devote so much space to the third-term idea 1 Do you 
 think it is wise for Conkling to speak slurringly of the Demo- 
 crats ? What does he gain by the verse at the opening ? Tell 
 why the first sentence is effectively written. INIake a list of 
 the references to definite services, like ' ' terms of Lee 's surren- 
 der," "veto of expansion in currency." 
 TJiird Day. — Make a simple outline of an original nominating 
 speech, taking one of the subjects suggested near the end of 
 this lesson. Write out the speech. Criticize and rewrite 
 carefully. 
 Fourth Day. — Imagine that you are to make an address following 
 the points in your outline. Develop them orally, as if talking 
 to an audience. Go through the entire outline in this way, 
 without stopping to repeat or to improve any parts. 
 Fifth Day. — If you contemplate making a real nominating speech 
 or any other kind of speech, prepare your outline carefully 
 as suggested, and criticize your own work severely. 
 
 Final AYord 
 
 In making these speeches, try to put yourself in a real 
 situation. Nominate men about whom you know and 
 about whom you are enthusiastic. In practice, throw 
 yourself fully into the subject; vividly realize the occa- 
 sion, living it all out in imagination. The speaker who is 
 thoroughly filled with his subject and who is in earnest 
 usually makes a good impression. Therefore, if you 
 master your message and determine to deliver it as 
 planned, you have to be exceedingly poor in speaking to 
 spoil the success of your speech. But remember, each 
 group of ideas must be well organized and the whole 
 speech must be planned along distinct, clean-cut lines. 
 
30 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Without the reenforcement of such thorough preparation, 
 your enthusiasm will vanish and your earnestness will 
 give way to doubt and confusion. Prepare j'ourself well, 
 then speak to win. 
 
 TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the stiulent to vise in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are suggestive merely, dealing largely with tlie practical 
 application of the principles, and are to he ])laced in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 -^ 1. What are the three major parts in the organization of a 
 speech ? 
 
 2. In your own writing and speaking, do you use the terms 
 
 '"first," "second," etc.. for the main divisions of your thought? 
 
 •'). Kecall some speaker whose thought seems confused. Recall 
 
 the speakers to whom it is easy to Hsten. Is not the important 
 
 difference between them in clearness of outline? 
 
 4. Remember an audience that was hostile to a speaker. 
 What was the hostility? 
 
 5. How did the speaker endeavor to overcome the hostility? 
 Did he succeed? 
 
 6. When may a speaker plunge into his topic without an 
 introduction? 
 
 7. Recall without consulting the text the main divisions of 
 Conkling's speech nominating Grant. 
 
 8. What was the greatest objection to the nomination of 
 Grant? 
 
 9. Wliy does Conkling leave that point until well toward the 
 end of his address? 
 
 10. Do you recall a recent national convention in which a 
 nominating speaker faced practically the same objection as 
 ( 'onkling did? 
 
 11. Conkling's speech seems rather florid (flowery). When 
 is this style justifiable? In what kinds of addresses Is it 
 entirely out of place? 
 
 12. Reproduce from memory the general outline suitable for 
 most nonnnating speeches. 
 
 13. Recall some nominating speech you have heard. How 
 does it compare with Conkling's? 
 
LESSON 3 
 
 THJS PURPOSE OF THE INTRODUCTION 
 
 We have seen that a speech has for its central purpose, 
 the (leHvery of a certain body of information — the ex- 
 pression of a message in which the speaker believes and 
 with which he hopes to influence his hearers. That mes- 
 sage constitutes the bqd^ of the speech. It may have 
 many parts or subdivisions, but all of them, taken to- 
 gether, round out the message the speaker has to deliver. 
 We have briefly suggested that it is often wise to smooth 
 the way for this message by some introductory remarks. 
 It will be the aim of this lesson and the following one to 
 show some of the obstacles which must be smoothed away 
 by the introduction and to indicate the proper methods 
 of doing this. We shall consider the purpose of the intro- ^ 
 duction under three heads: (A) To put the audience in 
 a state of favorable feeling; (B) to arouse interest and 
 secure attention; and (C) to prepare the audience to 
 understand the message. One caution must be given: 
 While planning the introduction and making a detailed 
 study of its particular functions, the whole speech must 
 be kept in mind all the time. All other parts merely set 
 the scenes, as it were, or throw a stronger light upon the 
 central theme. 
 
 (A) TO PUT THE AUDIENCE IX A STATE OF FAVOR- 
 ABLE FEELING 
 
 If the audience is well disposed to the speaker and his 
 subject, and if it is in a favorable emotional state — one 
 
 31 
 
32 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 of good will or entliusiasm, tlien one of the services of 
 an introduction is unnecessary. That service is to render 
 the autlience favorable, from an emotional or feeling 
 standpoint, to the reception of the message. But if there 
 is the slightest ill will, bad temper, or even indifference, 
 something nnist be done to remove it before the main 
 business of the speech is taken up. We all know that our 
 enemies condenm our views before they are stated. Ill 
 feeling is transferred from the man to his ideas. Not 
 only are strong feelings of hatred a bar to a fair hearing, 
 but even a slight inditference is sufficient to stand in 
 the way of an unl)iased reception. Then also, .the deliv- 
 ery of a speech may be surrounded by special circum- 
 stances which will make the auditors inclined away from 
 rather than toward the speaker and his cause. Later in 
 this lesson we shall enumerate various unfavoi-able emo- 
 tional states, discuss the circumstances which give rise 
 to them, and indicate methods of offsetting them. Just 
 now, while Conkling's nomination of Grant is fresh in 
 your mind, we shall show how Garfield undertook to 
 counteract the enthusiasm it aroused, in order that he 
 might present the name of another candidate. 
 
 How Garfield Wox a Hearing 
 
 Imagine the high excitement which reigned in the con- 
 vention when Conkling finished and had been ably sec- 
 onded by Bradley of Kentucky. To stem this tide of 
 feeling was (Jarfield's first necessity. He wanted to nom- 
 inate Sherman of Ohio. It would have been foolish to 
 jidvance a single thought in the line of his pui-pose until 
 he had brought his hearers to a state of (';diH and had 
 
PURPOSE OP THE INTKODUCTIOX 33 
 
 them forget, for a time at least, the words of Conkling. 
 Notice how he did it. 
 
 I have witnessed the extraordinary scenes of this conventioji 
 with deep solicitude. Nothing touches my heart more quickly 
 than a tribute of honor to a great and noble character; but as 
 I sat in my seat and witnessed this demonstration, this assein 
 blage seemed to me a human ocean in tempest. I have seen the 
 sea lashed into fury and tossed into spray, and its grandeui- 
 moves the soul of the dullest man ; but I remember that it is not 
 the billows, but the calm level of tVie sea, from which all heights 
 and depths are measured. When the storm has passed and the 
 hour of calm settles on the ocean, when the sunlight bathes its 
 peaceful surface, then the astronomer and surveyor take the 
 level from which they measure all terrestrial heights and 
 depths. 
 
 Gentlemen of the Conv(5ntion, your present temper may not 
 mark the healthful pulse of our people. When your enthusiasm 
 has passed, when the emotions of this hour have subsided, we 
 shall find below the storm and passion that calm level of public 
 opinion from which the thoughts of a mighty people are to be 
 measured, and by which final action will be determined. 
 
 Not here, in this brilliant circle, where fifteen thousand men 
 and women are gathered, is the destiny of the Republic to be 
 decreed for the next four years. Not here where I see the enthu- 
 siastic faces of seven hundred and fifty-six delegates, waiting 
 to cast their lots into the urn and determine the choice of the 
 Republic, but by four millions of Republican firesides, where 
 the thoughtful voters, Avith wives and children about them, with 
 the calm thoughts inspired by love of home and country, with 
 the history of the past, the hopes of the future, and reverence 
 for the great men who have adorned and blessed our nation in 
 days gone by, burning in their hearts, — there God prepares the 
 verdict which will determine the wisdom of our work tonight. 
 Not in Chicago, in the heat of June, but at the ballot-boxes of 
 the Republic, in the quiet of November, after the silence of 
 deliberate judgment, will this question be settled. And noAV, 
 gentlemen of the Convention, what do Ave want ? * 
 
34 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Bear with me for a moment. "Hear me for my cause," and 
 for a moment "be silent that you may hear." 
 
 Twenty-five years ago, this Republic was bearing and wear- 
 ing a triple chain of bondage. Long familiarity with traffic in 
 the bodies and souls of men had paralyzed the conscience 
 of a majority of our people; the narrowing and disintegrating 
 doctrine of State sovereignty had shackled and weakened the 
 noblest and most beneficent powers of the national government ; 
 and the grasping power of slavery was seizing upon the virgin 
 territories of the West and dragging them into the den of eternal 
 bonda.ge. 
 
 At that crisis, the Republican party Avas born. It drew its 
 first inspiration from the fire of liberty which God had lighted 
 in every human heart, and which all the powers of tyranny 
 and ignorance could not wholly extinguish. The Republican 
 party came to deliver and to save. It entered the arena where 
 the beleaguered and assailed Territories were struggling for 
 freedom, and drew around them the sacred circle of liberty^ 
 which the demon of slavery has never dared to cross. It made 
 them free forever. Strengthened by its victory on the frontier, 
 the young party, under the leadership of the great man who on 
 this spot, twenty years ago, was made its chief, entered the 
 national Capitol, and assumed the high duties of government. 
 The light which shone from its banner illumined its pathway to 
 power. Every slave-pen and the shackles of every slave within 
 the shadow of the Capitol were consumed in the rekindled fire 
 of freedom. 
 
 Our great national industries by cruel and calculating neglect 
 had been prostrated, and the streams of revenue flowed in such 
 feeble currents that the treasury itself was well-nigh empty. 
 The money of the people consisted mainly of the wretched notes 
 of two thousand uncontrolled and irresponsible state banking 
 corporations, which were filling the country with a circulation 
 that poisoned, rather than sustained, the life of business. 
 
 The Republican party changed all this. It abolished a 
 babel of confusion, and gave to the country a currency as 
 national as its fiag, bas(Ml upon the sacred -faith of the people. 
 It threw its protecting juiii ;i round our great industries, and 
 
PURPOSE OP THE INTRODUCTION 35 
 
 they stood erect with new life. It filled with the spirit of true 
 nationality all the great functions of the government. It con- 
 fronted a rebellion of unexampled magnitude, with slavery 
 behind it, and, under God, fought the final battle of liberty until 
 the victory was won. 
 
 After the storms of battle, were heard the calm words of 
 peace spoken by the conquering nation, saying to the foe that 
 hiy prostrate at its feet: "This is our only revenge — that you 
 join us in lifting into the serene firmament of the Constitution, 
 to shine like stars for ever and ever, the immortal principles of 
 truth and justice : that all men, white or black, shall be free, and 
 shall stand equal before the law." 
 
 Then came the questions of reconstruction, the national debt, 
 and the keeping of the public faith. In tlie settlement of these 
 (luestions, the Rej^ublicau party has completed its twenty-five 
 > ears of glorious existence and it has sent us here to prepare it 
 for another lustrum of duty and of victory. How shall we 
 accomplish this great work? We cannot do it, my friends, by 
 assailing our Republican brethren. God forbid that I should 
 say one word, or cast one shadow, upon any name on the roll 
 of our heroes. The coming fight is our Thermopylae. We are 
 standing upon a narrow isthmus. If our Spartan hosts are 
 united, we can withstand all the Persians that the Xerxes of 
 Democracy can bring against us. Let us hold our ground this 
 one year, and then "the stars in their courses" will fight for us. 
 The census will bring reenforcements and continued power.** 
 
 But in order to win victory now, we want the vote of every 
 Republican — of every Grant Republican, and every anti-Grant 
 Republican, in America — of every Blaine man and every anti- 
 Blaine man. The vote of every follower of every candidate is 
 needed to make success certain. Therefore I say, gentlemen 
 and brethren, we are here to take calm counsel together, and 
 inquire what we shall do. 
 
 We want a man whose life and opinions embody all the 
 achievements of which I have spoken. We want a man who, 
 standing on a mountain height, traces the victorious footsteps 
 of our party in the past, and, carrying in his heart the memory 
 of its glorious deeds, looks forward proparod to meet the dangers 
 
36 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 to come. We want one who will act in no spirit of unkindness 
 toward those we lately met in battle. The Republican party 
 offers to our brethren of the South the olive-branch of peace, and 
 invites them to renewed brotherhood on this supreme convic- 
 tion — that it shall be admitted forever, that in the war for the 
 Lnion we were right and they were wrong. On that supreme 
 conviction we meet them as brethren, and ask them to share with 
 us the blessings and honors of this great Republic. 
 
 Now, gentlemen, not to weary you, I am about to present a 
 name for your consideration, — the name of one who was the 
 comrade, associate, and friend of nearly all the noble dead, 
 whose faces look down upon us from these walls tonight ; a man 
 w ho began his career of public service twenty-five years ago, — 
 who courageously confronted the slave power in the days of 
 peril, on the plains of Kansas, when first began to fall the red 
 drops of that bloody shower which finally swelled into the deluge 
 of gore in the late rebellion. He bravely stood by young Kan- 
 sas, and, returning to his seat in the national legislature, his 
 pathway through all the subsequent years has been marked by 
 labors worthily performed in every department of legislation. 
 
 You ask for his monument. I point you to twenty-five years 
 of national statutes. Not one great, beneficent law has been 
 placed on our statute books without his intelligent and powerful 
 aid. lie aided in fornuilating the laws to raise the great armies 
 and navies which carried us through the war. His hand was 
 seen in the workmanship of those statutes that restored and 
 brought back "the unity and married calm of states." His 
 liand was in all that great legislation that created the war cur- 
 rency, and in all the still greater work that redeemed the prom- 
 ises of the government and made the currency equal to gold. 
 
 When at last he passed from the halls of legislation into a 
 liigh execntive office, he displayed that experience, intelligence, 
 firnniess, and poise of character, wliich liave carried us through 
 a stormy period of three years, with one-half the public press 
 crying, "Cracify him!" and a hostile Congress seeking to pre- 
 vent success. In all this he remained unmoved until victory 
 crowned him. The great fiscal affairs of the nation, and the vast 
 business interests of. the country, he guarded and preserved 
 
PURPOSE OF THE INTRODUCTlOxX 37 
 
 while executing the law of resumption, and etfceted its object 
 without a jar and against the false prophecies of one-half of the 
 press and of all the Democratic party. 
 
 He has shown himself able to meet with calmness the great 
 emergencies of the government. For twenty-five years he has 
 trodden the perilous heights of public duty, and against all the 
 shafts of malice has borne his breast unharmed. He has stood 
 in the blaze of "that fierce light that beats against the throne"; 
 but its fiercest ray has found no flaw in his armor, no stain upon 
 his shield. I do not present him as a better Republican or a bet- 
 ter man than thousands of others that we honor; but I present 
 him for your deliberate and favorable consideration. I nominate 
 John Shei-man of Ohio.^ 
 
 Observations ox How Garfield Changed the Feelings of 
 AN Audience in an Unfavorable Emotional State 
 
 1. He does not harshly attack Grant or Conkling or 
 say anything to offend tliem or their friends. 
 
 2. He flatters the audience positively by such expres- 
 sions as ''this brilliant circle" and "delegates * * * 
 to determine the choice of the Eepublic." 
 
 In a somewhat negative way he appeases them by call- 
 ing their faults "enthusiasm" and comparing them in 
 grandeur with the ocean. 
 
 3. Only gradually does he bring about the feeling that 
 possibly a calmer frame of mind is necessary and prefer- 
 able to the tempest of enthusiasm (to point marked * on 
 page 33). 
 
 4. Then he holds them on another topic about which 
 all present agree, namely, the glories of the Republican 
 
 >V, 1 It is interesting to laiow that tliis speech won the nomination and 
 consequent presidency not for Sherman, but for Garfiekl himself. It 
 called attention to the availability of Garfield. The vote that nominated 
 Garfield was: Garfield, 399; Grant, 306; Blaine, 42; Washbourne, 5; 
 Sherman, 3. Necessary for choice, 378. 
 
38 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 party from its birth all tlirough its legislative accomplish- 
 ments. 
 
 This was introductory and designed to efface the emo- 
 tions in which he found his audience. After that, he de- 
 livered a speech almost identical in form with that of 
 Conkling's speech. Compare the part from the two stars 
 (**) to the end, with the nomination of Grant. Garfield 
 gives virtues to Sherman similar to those already attrib- 
 uted to Grant, and the whole eulogy is as like the other 
 as two separate speeches could possibly be. But ob- 
 serve that he leaves the naming of his man to the end. 
 That was a wise course when we consider that Sherman 
 was a dark horse and' the eulogy was likely to strengthen 
 the name rather than the name secure favorable attention 
 to the eulogy. 
 
 Introduction is Used Whenever Any Change Whatso- 
 ever IS Wanted in the Emotional Set of the Audience 
 
 It must not be thought that the introduction to influ- 
 ence the emotional state of the audience is used only 
 when the audience is in a state of more or less violent 
 opposition ; it is of service whenever a change in the emo- 
 tional atmosjjhere (if we may use that expression) is 
 desirable. The little child acts this out when he resorts 
 to all sorts of blandishments before asking his mother 
 for money to buy candy. The travelling salesman knows 
 it when he tells innumerable funny stories before showing 
 his samples. The after-dinner speaker feels the need of 
 a favorable mood when he begins with puns and jokes. 
 Remembering that it is not wise to plunge into your 
 message until you get the audience in a favorable (-mo- 
 tional state, let us (without pi-etending to be exhaustive) 
 
PURPOSE OF TIIP] INTEODUCTTON 39 
 
 cnumorate some of tlio typical situations to be faced and 
 suggest methods of meeting them. 
 
 How TO Meet Typical Intkoductory Difficulties 
 
 (a) Strong Enthusiasm fur Another Cause'^ 
 
 Seek to get the audience into a state of calm; talk for 
 a while upon something about which all agree. Keep 
 this up until the first emotions are well in the background. 
 Then gradually introduce the new message and work for 
 your pwn effects. 
 
 (h) Direct Hostility 
 
 Strong feeling against you or your cause. The time- 
 honored example of this situation is the Liverpool speecli 
 of Henry Ward Beecher. He was in England to speak 
 for the Northern cause during the Civil War. Liverpool 
 was a great shipping center and did an enormous busi- 
 ness importing raw cotton from the Southern States and 
 exporting to them manufactured goods and machinery. 
 The people not only sympathized with the South and 
 hated th^ North, but they had been inflamed against 
 Beecher. He had been misquoted on public placards; 
 the words, attributed to him, made him the arch-enemy 
 of England. His character had been painted most black ; 
 he had been threatened with death. When he faced 
 his audience, he was greeted, with a roar of derision, cat- 
 calls, arid threats. For an hour and a half he worked on 
 the audience until he had a fair degree of sympathetic 
 attention; then he proceeded with his arguments. The 
 
 2 Illustratoil in the rfarfield speech. 
 
40 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 following extracts from his introduction will indicate 
 his method. 
 
 For more than twenty-five years I have been perfectly famil- 
 iar with popular assemblies in all parts of my country except 
 the extreme South. There has not for the whole of that time 
 been a single day of my hfe when it would have been safe for 
 me to go south of the Mason and Dixon's line in my own coun- 
 try, and all for one reason : my solemn, earnest and persistent 
 testimony against what I consider to be the most atrocious thing 
 under the sun — the system of American slavery in a great, free 
 republic. * * * I have passed through the period when the 
 right of free speech was denied me. * * * Now since I have 
 been in England, although I have met M'ith greater kindness and 
 courtesy on the part of most than I deserve, yet on the other 
 hand I see that the Southern influence jirevails to some extent 
 in England. (Applause and uproar.) * * * One thing is 
 very certain — if you do permit me to speak, you will hear very 
 plain talking. (Applause and hisses.) * * * And if I do 
 not mistake the tone and temper of Englishmen, they had rather 
 have a man wlio opposes them in a manly way than a sneak who 
 agrees with them in an unmanly way. (Applause and "Bravo.") 
 If I can carry you Avith me by sound convictions, I shall be 
 immensely glad (applause) ; but if I cannot carry you with me 
 liy facts and sound arguments, I do not wish you to go wdth me 
 at all; and all that I ask is simply fair play. (A voice: "You 
 shall have it too.") 
 
 The method here is to make an open, manly appeal foi" 
 fair play. The manner should be conciliatory but not sub- 
 servieni Make it clear that fair play is expected from 
 such an audience. Get the personal good will of the 
 audience. Then treat some matters of general truth or 
 principle u])on which all will agree. Such ideals as those 
 of freedom, justice, honor, integrity, etc., may be used. 
 Then with these general matters of agreement as a point 
 of depai'ture, gradually shoAv the reasonaldeness of your 
 
PURPOSE OF THE INTRODUCTION 41 
 
 sjjecific message because it is in harmony with what they 
 already accept. Be most cautions and tactful as you pro- 
 ceed to new topics; never lose the grasp you obtain. 
 When the audience is with you from the start,l)C>tdness is 
 a virtue and you can carry all before you with a rush. 
 But when the audience is originally hostile, after securing 
 a hearing, proceed with great care. 
 
 (c) Indifference or Lack of Positively Favorable 
 Emotions 
 
 This is the condition in which most audiences are found. 
 They have not been excited in any definite direction be- 
 fore the speaker begins to address them. Whatever emo- 
 tions or moods exist, they are individual and not collect- 
 ive. One man may be happy and his neighbor depressed. 
 The speaker here seeks to create a general or common 
 emotional state favorable to the reception of the mes- 
 sage. Here we may well discuss those things in the 
 speaker or in the way he approaches his subject that al- 
 ways incline the hearer favorably toward him. 
 
 1. The Speaker Must Always Appear Modest. — Even 
 our friends are inclined to give us a rap or two if they 
 think us conceited. Those who are indifferent are turned 
 from us by a display of egotism, while our enemies openly 
 deride us for it. Therefore, a speaker must always be 
 modest. It is a noteworthj^ fact that this quality is evi- 
 dent in the opening remarks of over seventy-five per cent 
 of the speeches we have examined. Tlie manner, as well 
 as the actual words used, is of great importance. Indeed 
 the words without the manner is only mock-modesty, an 
 irritating and undesirable evidence of the greatest 
 egotism. The virtue of modesty must appear throughout 
 
42 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the speech, but a lack of it is more evident in the begin- 
 ning. Observe the following opening of John Hancock's 
 Oration upon the Boston Massacre (March 5, 1774). 
 
 The attentive gravity, the venerable appearance of this 
 crowded audience; the dignity which I behold in the counte- 
 nances of so many of this great assembly ; the solemnity of the 
 occasion upon which we have met together, joined to a consid- 
 eration of the part I am to take in the important business of 
 this day, fill me with an awe hitherto unknown, and heighten 
 the sense which I have ever had, of my unworthiness to fill this 
 sacred desk. But, allured by the call of some of my respected 
 fellow-citizens, wuth whose request it is always my greatest 
 pleasure to comply, I almost forgot my w^ant of ability to per- 
 form what they required. In this situation I find my only sup- 
 port in assuring myself that a generous people will not severely 
 censure what they^ know was well intended, though its want of 
 merit should prevent their being able to applaud it. And I 
 pray that my sincere attachment to the interest of my country, 
 and hearty detestation of any design formed against her liber- 
 ties, may be admitted as some apology for my appearance in this 
 place. 
 
 2. Sincerity is the next quality which must make its 
 impression upon the audience at the outset. It is some- 
 times thought that sincerity is a quality only displayed 
 in very serious speeches. But we do not limit ourselves 
 that way in our use of the term. A man may be sincerely 
 jolly as well as grave. By sincerity, we mean that a 
 person truly jentei's into the fegling which his words out- 
 wardly express. A speaker has impressed his sincerity 
 upon an audience when those in it believe that he is ^m- 
 self , expressing his own thoughts and f eeling s and not 
 })retending for the sake of effect. 
 
 Notice the sincerity as well as modesty in the example 
 
r rCRPOSE OF THE INTRODUCTION 43 
 
 just given and also in the following- from "The Claim 
 of Socialism," by William Morris: 
 
 I have locked at this elaiin by the light of history and my 
 owu conseieiiee, and it seems to me — so k)oked at — to l)e a 
 most just claim, and that resistance to it means nothing short of 
 a denial of the hope of civilization. 
 
 This, then, is the claim : 
 
 It is right and necessary that all men should have work 
 to do which shall be worth doing, and be of itself pleasant to 
 do : and which should be done under such conditions as would 
 make it neither over-wearisome nor over-anxious. 
 
 Turn that claim about as I may, think of it as long as I can, 
 I cannot find that it is an exorbitant claim; yet again I say if 
 Society would or could admit it, the face of the world would 
 be changed; discontent and strife and dishonesty would be 
 ended. To feel that we were doing work useful to others and 
 ] leasant to ourselves, and that such work and its due reward 
 could not fail us ! What serious harm could happen to us then ? 
 
 Of course protestations of modesty and sincerity 
 should not be made in tiresome profusion. Booker T. 
 Washington began an address to the Harvard Alumni 
 as follows: "If through me, an humble representative, 
 the eight millions of my people in the South might be 
 permitted to bring a message to Harvard * * * that 
 message would be," etc. The aim is to be of gentle- 
 manly modesty and to avoid offensive cock-sureness. 
 Too great a display of confidence at the outset offends 
 most men. Flippancy also gives the impression of 
 shallowness and lack of sincerity. The following extract 
 shows an excellent blending of the qualities desired with 
 a winsome good humor. It is the beginning of John 
 Hay's speech on Omar Khayyam and Fitzg&rald, deliv- 
 ered before the Omar Khayyam Club of London, 
 December 8, 1897. 
 
44 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 I cannot sufficiently thank you for the high and unmerited 
 honor you have done me tonight. I feel keenly that on such an 
 occasion, Avith such company, my plac^is below the salt; but as 
 you kindly invited me, it was not in human nature to refuse. 
 
 Although in knowledge and comprehension of the two great 
 poets whom you are met to commemorate I am the least among 
 you, there is no one who regards them with greater admiration, 
 or reads them with more enjoyment than myself. I can never 
 forget my emotions when I first saw Fitzgerald's translation of 
 the Quatrains. Keats, in his sublime ode on Chapman's Homer, 
 has described the sensation once for all: 
 
 Then felt I like some watcher of the skies 
 When a new planet swims into his ken. 
 
 The exquisite lieauty, the faultless form, the singular grace of 
 those amazing stanzas were not more wonderful than the depth 
 and breadth of their profound philosophy, their knowledge of 
 life, their dauntless courage, their serene facing of the ultimate 
 problems of life and of death. — From Addresses of John Hay, 
 Century Co., 1906. 
 
 3. Add to the two (jualities mcntioiied personal atfracf- 
 iveness, composite of all those indescribable things 
 which make one person more universally liked than an- 
 other. Of course that cannot be prepared in a moment as 
 part of the introduction of a particular speech. The 
 whole life of goodfellowship, kindliness, and accomplish- 
 ments gradually builds it u]). A speaker can, however, 
 earnestly try to keep the w(dfare of the audience before 
 him and speak to them from the vantage point of high 
 ideals. If this be done, his best personality will show 
 through his words and live in every gesture. 
 
 There are other ways in which the introduction pre- 
 pares the wayjor the message proper, but they are not 
 matters of emotion or feeling. For instance, the intro- 
 
PURPOSE OF THE IXTRODUCTrON 45 
 
 (luction servos to attract and hold the attention so that 
 the ideas will all be properly grasped; it x)i"fp<^i'es or edn- 
 cates the audience to an understanding' of the subseciuent 
 speech and it marks out the subject an 1 method of treat- 
 ment. But all these services are connected with the in- 
 tellectual or knowing aspect of speech-making and not the 
 emotional. In this lesson we confined ourselves to the 
 emotional side. 
 
 Summary 
 
 Let us sunnnarize our lesson in somewhat different 
 order and also add some directions. 
 
 1. Never attempt to deliver your message until there 
 is a favorable emotional "atmosphere." 
 
 2. Secure good will by being your best self and by being 
 truly well-disposed toward what is right. Be modest and 
 sincere. 
 
 3. Set out deliberately to secure a state of calm or a 
 removal of undesirable emotions. Then work to incline 
 the audience so as to receive your own message most 
 favorably. 
 
 4. Never forget that what is gained by the introduc- 
 tion in emotional favor nuist be maintained throughout 
 tlie speech. 
 
 5. The introduction may have to be made impromptu, 
 for it is not always possible to foresee just how the audi- 
 ence will be feeling when you meet them. If you have 
 planned an introduction which is found to be unhappy, 
 discard it and deal directly w4th the actual situation you 
 face. Of course it is often possible to prepare a perfectly 
 usable introduction beforehand. It is especially advis- 
 able to have in the introduction some reference or refer- 
 
46 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ences to events that have happened, or words that have 
 been said, just before you begin to speak. 
 
 6. Always prepare the body of the speech before doing- 
 any work on the introduction. 
 
 7. Observe the manner of speakers you hear and deter- 
 mine what there is winsome or repulsive about their open- 
 ing remarks. Also note when and why a discordant note 
 is struck during the body of the speech. More can be 
 gained by observing real speakers than by reading books ; 
 most can be secured by much speaking on your own part. 
 These lessons serve to guide and direct, but The examples 
 of real life must be observed to make the subject live. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exercises in this entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 First Day. — You have read through the lesson. Now study it 
 again carefully, mastering its contents. Do not attempt any 
 of the exercises until after the second reading. 
 
 i^ccond Day. — Take a nominating speech such as you prepared 
 for the last lesson and write out an introduction Avhicli would 
 be appropriate when the audience is in a state of enthusiasm 
 for another nominee. 
 
 Third Day. — AA^rite out an introduction for one of the following 
 speeches : 
 
 1. In favor of the closed shop ; delivered before an employers' 
 
 association. 
 
 2. In favor of the open shop ; before a union which now tol- 
 
 erates only tlie closed shop. 
 
 3. Against child labor ; before a body of mill owners. 
 
 4. In eulogy of Abraham Lincoln ; before an audience in 
 
 Charleston, South Carolina. 
 
 5. In eulog}^ of Calhoun; before an audience in Boston. 
 
 6. In favor of woman's suffrage: delivered in New York. 
 
PURPOSE OF THE IXTRODUCTIOX 47 
 
 7. Against woman's snffrage ; delivered in Illinois or some 
 other sntt'rage state. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Prepare a eomplete outline or plan of a speech 
 you might be called upon to make, and with it an 
 introduction written out fully. Append a note stating the 
 occasion of the speech and the nature of the audience. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Give this speech in full orally several times. Go 
 over the introduction often but do not memorize it. Let 
 what will, recur during the oral development, but make no 
 effort to remember exact words. Have the outline of the 
 body well in mind, and develop it by headings. Remember 
 to keep the headings well grouped. Amplify each heading 
 fully before passing to the next. 
 
 TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are siigyestire merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in 
 the notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. How did Garfield endeavor to offset the intense enthusiasm 
 aroused by Conkling? 
 
 2. Do you recall any other speaker who used, for a similar 
 l)urpose, a striking figure of speech like Garfield's figure of the 
 storm-tossed ocean? 
 
 3. State for yourself the facts in regard to the formation of 
 the Republican Party as outlined by Garfield. 
 
 4. What elements in Garfield's speech may have helped win for 
 him the nomination he desired for Sherman! Do you remember 
 another speech which won a nomination for the presidency? 
 
 5. How could you introduce remarks complimentary to a gen- 
 eral audience in your town if you were pleading for money for a 
 new park? 
 
 6. What'are the features in the quotation from William ^Morris 
 which would tend to prepare the minds of the audience for a 
 favorable hearing? 
 
 7. "What elements in Beecher's introduction will always succ(^ed 
 in overcoming direct hostility on the part of an audience? 
 
48 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 --. 8. Indifference is the diffieulty most speakers have to face. 
 What three qualities in the speaker himself will go far toward 
 removing indifference '? 
 
 9. Recall the speaker who seems to you the most sincere man 
 you have ever heard. How does this sincerity modify his 
 speaking ? 
 
 10. A very important point in this lesson is the wisdom of 
 referring in your introduction to something that has been said or 
 done or has happened just before you begin to speak. Plan some 
 such extempore remarks for the following situations : 
 
 (a) A preceding speaker has cast reflections on your sincerity. 
 
 (b) The presiding officer has referred to you as "eloquent." 
 
 (c) There has recently occurred a public disaster. 
 
 (d) A man in your town has received some merited public 
 honor. 
 
 (e) You are the memlier of a defeated faction in recent elec- 
 tion. 
 
 (f) The preceding speaker has taken a large part of your 
 time. 
 
LESSON 4 
 
 THE PURPOSE OF THE INTRODUCTION (Continued) 
 
 111 our last lesson, we dwelt upon the necessity of hav- 
 ing the audience well disposed. In this connection we 
 considered the first purpose of an introduction, namely, 
 to put the audience in a state of favorable feeling. All 
 hostile feelings must be overcome at the outset and a 
 strong effort made to secure the positive good will of 
 the hearers. But the student must not get the notion 
 that a few magic words in the introduction will establish 
 pleasant relations once and for all. Quite the contrary; 
 throughout the whole address, the speaker must, by his 
 frank, modest, and earnest manner, by his careful state- 
 ment of some things and his tactful avoidance of others, 
 preserve and cultivate the desired mood of his auditors. 
 Great trial lawyers have been known to labor with jury- 
 men for hours in order to touch the responsive chord 
 in each one. Such master-students of the human heart 
 are too wise to proceed with a contention until they are 
 sure that the hearers are in a s^Tupathetic emotional 
 state. And whenever new material is to be introduced 
 or a change of viewpoint is necessary, these men seek to 
 establish the new trend of thought without spoiling the 
 favorable attitude. 
 
 (B) TO AROUSE INTEREST AND SECURE ATTENTION 
 
 Besides this first purpose of creating friendly feelings 
 there are two other ends which the speaker muBt smi^mv 
 
 49 
 
50 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 plish and toward wliicli he usually begins to work in the 
 introduction. One of these is to arouse the interest of the 
 auditors in order to secure their best attention. Although 
 related, it is distinct from the emotional set just consid- 
 ered. We need not demonstrate the necessity of atten- 
 tion. Without it, the speaker can no more hope to de- 
 liver his message than a telegraph sender can expect to 
 transmit a message with the receiver asleep at the other 
 end of the wire. The various devices to be used to gain 
 the attention may be classified under two main headings : 
 those which are of the nature of ah nipt shocks and those 
 which are promises of reward. The audience may be 
 thrilled into attentiveness or they may be won by the 
 expectation of hearing something of advantage to them. 
 Either or both of these kinds of artifices may be used. 
 By attention, we mean a state in which the hearer ex- 
 cludes other meditations and concentrates his mind upon 
 the words of the speaker. It is a condition of intellec- 
 tual acuteness. 
 
 The Striking Stim.ulus to Attention 
 
 As we have noted, the shock is one means of securing 
 attention. It is especially valuabh^ at the very begin- 
 ning of a speech, but it may be used at any place where 
 the speaker perceives that he is losing his griji ui)on 
 the audience. French orators are very fond of th(> 
 striking opening. Notice the effect of these words of 
 Victor Hugo, used at the beginning of liis defense of his 
 son: 
 
 Geiitk'UH'U of the jury, if there is a euljii'it here, it is not 
 my son, — it is myself, — it is I 1 1. who for these twenty-five 
 years have opposed capital pniiishuK^iit, — have contended for 
 
PURPOSE OF THE INTKODUCTION 51 
 
 the inviolability of human life, — have committed this crime for 
 \\hich my son is now arraigned. Here I denounce myself, Mr. 
 Advocate General ! 1 have committed it under all aggravated 
 circumstances, deliberately, repeatedly, tenaciously. Yes, this 
 old and absurd lex talionis — this law of blood for blood — I have 
 combated all my life — all my life, Gentlemen of the Jury ! And 
 while I have breath, I will continue to combat it, by all my efforts 
 as a writer, by all my words and all my votes as a legislator ! 
 1 declare it before the crucifix; before that victim of the penalty 
 of death, who sees and hears us; before that gibbet, to which, 
 two thousand years ago, for the eternal instruction of the gen- 
 erations, the human law nailed the Divine ! 
 
 Robespierre began his last speech, delivered two days 
 before his death, with these words : 
 
 The enemies of the Republic call me tyrant ! Were I such 
 they would grovel at my feet. I should gorge them with gold, 
 I should grant them immunity for their crimes, and they would 
 be grateful. Were I such, the kings we have vanquished, far 
 from denouncing Robespierre, would lend me their guilty suji^ 
 port. There would be a covenant between them and me. 
 
 Henry Ward Beecher is said to have begun a ser- 
 mon, one hot Sunday morning, while mopping his brow, 
 with the remark: "It is hotter than hell!" Naturally\ , 
 tliis shocked his very moral audience into attention, and 
 be did not lose his initial hold on them until he had com- 
 pleted his talk on the punishment of sin. Once, when 
 he was to speak in the Broadway Tabernacle, on the 
 Death of John Brown, he waited in an ante-room, not 
 going to the platform until the very moment his lecture 
 was to begin. Then, suddenly opening the door, he 
 sprang to the platform, dragging a massive chain after 
 him. Facing the audience, he cried out: ''These 
 shackles bound the limbs of a human being ; I hate them ; 
 
 X 
 
52 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 I trample them under foot!" and suited tlie action to the 
 word. 
 
 Henry AV. Grady, a Soutlierner, speaking before the 
 New England Society, in New York, introduced his ad- 
 dress on the New South as follows : 
 
 "There was a South of slavery and secession — that South is 
 dead. There is a South of union and freedom — that South, 
 thank God. is living, breathing, growing every hour." 
 
 These words, delivered from the immortal lips of Benjamin 
 II. Hill at Tammany Hall iu 1866. true then and truer now, I 
 shall take for my text tonight. 
 
 In all these examples, we see that an unusual or un- 
 expected thing was said. It forced attention. A i)ara- 
 dox, epigram, or striking sentiment may always be de- 
 pended upon to have the desired effect. But attention 
 attracted in such a way is, as a rule, momentary only. 
 If prolonged concentration is wanted, other agencies 
 must be used to sustain the interest. 
 
 Attextiox Tjirough Promised Gaix 
 
 The influence to be used to get and maintain more per- 
 manent attention is the promise of gain. The audience 
 must have some hope of reward. If all can be made to 
 believe that the speaker will treat a very vital subject 
 — one touching tlieii* welfare or affecting those enter- 
 prises in which tliey ai-e engaged, they will remain at- 
 tentive. 
 
 Pati'ick Henry, in his Appeal to Anns, ini))ressed the 
 lieai-ei-s with the iiiijtoi-taiice of tlie discussion not (udy to 
 tlieir own but also to the nation's (h'stiny. 
 
 Mr. I'r.'si.lciit Xd ..lie thinks m..iv liiulily llian 1 do of the 
 ])atri()tisiii, as well as the al)iliti('.s. of the vrvy werlliy tiriil Iriiicii 
 
PURPOSE OK TJIE INTRODUCTIOX 53 
 
 who have just addressed the house. But different men often 
 see the same subject in different lights; and, tlierefore, I hope 
 it will not seem disrespectful to those gentlemen, if, entertaining, 
 as I do, opinions quite contrary to theirs, I speak forth my 
 sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for 
 ceremony. The question before the house is one of awful mo- 
 numt to this country. For my part, I consider it as nothing 
 less than a question of freedom or slavery ; and in proportion 
 to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of 
 debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at 
 truth, and fultil the great responsibility which we owe to God 
 and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a 
 time as this, I should consider myself as guilty of treason toward 
 my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the ^lajesty of 
 Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings. 
 
 This part of Patrick Henry's speecli does not directly 
 promise a reward to his hearers for their attention, but 
 it strongly intimates that the discussion will help to 
 avoid impending- disaster, Edward Everett, in his ad- 
 dress before the scholarly Phi Beta Kappa society at 
 Harvard, after a few preliminary remarks, stated his 
 subject and aroused interest in it with these words : 
 
 But from the wide held of literary speculation, and innumer- 
 able subjects of meditation which arise in it, a selection must 
 be made. And it has seemed to me proper that we should direct 
 our thoughts not merely to a subject of interest to scholars, but 
 to one which may recommend itself as peculiarly appropriate to 
 us. * * * I shall need no excuse to a society of American 
 scholars, in choosing for the theme of an address, on an occasion 
 like this, the peculiar motives to intellectual exertion in Amer- 
 ica. In this subject, that curiosity which every scholar feels in 
 tracing and comparing the springs of mental activity, is height- 
 ened and dignified by the important connection of the inquiry 
 with the condition and prospects of our native land. 
 
54 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Men in all walks of life and in varions organizations 
 have certain tastes and interests. If the speaker can 
 judge his audience aright and extend a promise that 
 their desires will be satisfied and their welfare consulted, 
 he has taken a step in the direction of securing their un- 
 divided attention. Once secured, it must not he lost. If 
 the attention falls off, it must be stimulated anew. Th(> 
 mental attitude of the speaker also must be one of alert- 
 ness, for if he observes any signs of inattention, he must 
 quicken his hearers to renewed application. 
 
 (C) TO PREPARE THE AUDIENCE TO UNDERSTAND 
 MOST THOROUGHLY 
 
 There is still another duty usually performed by the 
 preliminary portion of the speech; this third duty is to 
 prepare the way for an intellectual grasp or understand- 
 ing of the message. This is not a matter of feeling, but 
 of knowing. A man may like you ever so well, and in- 
 deed be anxious to hear and to appreciate all you care to 
 say; but if you inflict an argument upon him before ho 
 is acquainted with the facts of the case, he will not un- 
 derstand your reasoning any more than a stranger would 
 understand the charge of a judge to the jury if he should 
 enter the conrt after all the testimony has been taken. 
 We may put it directly by saying that an audience must 
 be educated up to understanding your argument. 
 
 To explain this matter concretely, let us suppose that 
 you had been asked to prepare a speech favoring reci- 
 procity with Canada, in 1911, when the question of 
 reciprocity was -before tlie two countries. Before you 
 could j)roceed witli your reasons for favoring the ar- 
 rangement, you would have to ex])1niii the situation — the 
 
PURPOSE OF THE IXTRODrCTION 55 
 
 commercial relations of the two comitries, the nature of 
 the proposed measures, and the exact meaning of any 
 technical terms which might be used. Note the follow- 
 ing fragment as an appropriate introduction to such a 
 speech. 
 
 Ladies and Gentlemen : 
 
 As you already know, we are here tonight to discuss the 
 probable economic advantage which would be gained by the 
 Ignited States if the proposed reciprocity agreement with Canada 
 should be put into operation. Being a good Yankee, I am inter- 
 ested wherever my pocket-book is affected. It was probably this 
 sort of interest which led me to undertake a most careful study 
 of the trade agreement under consideration ; and I believe I 
 have delved deeply enough to be able to make it clear that you 
 and I will profit by the kind of reciprocity contemplated. There 
 is, in my mind, not the slightest doubt that the cost of living will 
 be reduced to an appreciable extent while our manufactures and 
 other industries will be stimulated. 
 
 Let us survey the situation which confronts the nation. The 
 United States and Canada are aliout equal in size, but very dis- 
 similar in development and wealth. That each derives some 
 benefit from the industry of the other is evident from the great 
 trade which now passes across the border. The United States 
 sells Canada nearly twice as much as Great Britain, our nearest 
 competitor for her trade, while we purchase from Canada almost 
 as much as does the mother country. Last year, Canada sent 
 us approximately $98,000,000 worth of goods, while she bought 
 about .$216,000,000 worth from this country. At present the 
 commerce is carried on under artificial and difficult conditions. 
 Each country imposes duties of varying severity upon the goods 
 of the other which seek entrance. For example, Canada charges 
 a duty of 25'/; of the value on all live cattle sold by American 
 ranchers to Canadians, 12 cents a bushel on wheat and 40 cents 
 a barrel on apples; while the United States shuts out the same 
 goods coming in from Canada by a tax of 27% on cattle, 25 
 cents a bushel on wheat and 25 cents a bushel on apples. It is 
 now proposed to remove these barriers to free trade between 
 
56 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the two countries, in the case of some articles and materially 
 to reduce it in the case of others. What would be the effect of 
 lowering the commercial wall, upon the welfare of the United 
 States, and therefore upon us? 
 
 What we mean by economic welfare or benefit may need some 
 slight explanation. The economic man of modern society does 
 two things; he produces goods which he expects the rest of 
 society to consume, and he consumes goods which he expects the 
 rest of society to produce. A country secures an economic 
 benefit whenever its citizens are given a larger opportunity to 
 use their productive powers to advantage and Avhen they are 
 enabled to consume to greater satisfaction. As producers, they 
 look for wider and more profitable markets; as consumers, they 
 seek cheaper and better commodities. I believe the proposed 
 arrangement will benefit us in just these two ways. 
 
 Before going into the details of the matter let us get a clear 
 idea of the general nature of the agreement. It is not to take 
 the form of a treaty, but both nations are to enact its various 
 schedules and provisions simultaneously as tariff laws. The 
 agreement provides that fishing privileges, hitherto denied, be 
 granted to American fishermen in Canadian waters and makes 
 tariff provisions for certain listed goods in four great schedules. 
 Schedule A enumerates a number of raw commodities such as 
 live animals, grain, fish, and dairy products, as well as a small 
 number of manufactured articles— all to be admitted to both 
 countries duty free. The articles in schedule B are either par- 
 tially the result of a manufacturing process, as meats and flour, 
 or they are wholly manufactured, as farm implements, cutlery, 
 and automobiles. At present both countries put very high duties 
 on these goods. Furthermore, the duties are not uniform. .The 
 proposal is that a reciprocal rate be put on every article men- 
 tioned so that each country has an equal chance at the market 
 of the other. This rate is, in most cases, lower than the one now 
 existing on cither side the lino. Schedule C contains Canadian 
 specialties tiiat are to have the American duty against them low- 
 ered though the Canadian rate is to remain unchanged. Sched- 
 -nle D does the same thing for American specialties that will 
 presumably be shipped to Canada. ^ 
 
PURPOSE OF THE IXTRODUCTTON 57 
 
 AVc slinll take up the agreenu'iit ai'ticlc l)y article and show 
 that tlie i)r()visioiis of the four selie(hih'S make for the eeoiiomic 
 advantage of the majority of the eitizens of the United States. 
 
 Read that passage again and note the following char- 
 acteristics : 
 
 1. The opening though apparently boastful is in real- 
 ity modest, for the speaker attributes his expert knowl- 
 edge not so much to personal superiority as to hard work 
 })rompted by money interest. 
 
 2. The attention of the audience is secured by appeal- 
 ing to their economic interest. This is reenforced at the 
 end of each paragraph. 
 
 3. Necessary information is given to prepare the way 
 for a later argument on details. Note the following de- 
 tailed arg-ument (taken from the body of the same 
 speech) in connection with Schedule D and see liow much 
 an understanding of it is helped by the general informa- 
 tion of the introduction. 
 
 The first thing to notice ahout this schedule is that it does not 
 affect the American tariff shutting out the Canadian goods. It 
 ])rovides only that the enumerated American goods going into 
 Canada shall be let in at a reduced rate. Consequently the 
 lirmest Protectionist could not object to it. No intricate argu- 
 ment is needed to show that this lowering of the barrier will 
 ( reate a wider and better market for American goods. Thus is 
 il a benefit to the United States as a producer; it will give more 
 work to labor, more profit to American managers and call into 
 use more American cnyntal. But besides the general advantage, 
 a knowledge of a typical article emphasizes the desirability of 
 this provision. 
 
 Portland cement is produced in the United States to a value of 
 about fifteen times the product of Canada (U. S., $55,900,000; 
 Canada, $3,700,000. See 1909 International Year Book). The 
 Itusiness, however, has been at a standstill since 1907, due to the 
 
58 EFFECTIVE PFBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 failure of many concerns in the panic. The twelve per cent 
 reduction of the tariff on this commodity will give the producers 
 a better chance to sell in Canada^ Such an opening up of a 
 })etter market is just the sort of helj) the industry needs to put 
 it once more on the prosperous footing it had in 1906 and insure 
 its still greater development. Tlie next article for specific con- 
 sideration is l)ituminons coal. * * * 
 
 Tlie information in the introduction displays the rela- 
 tion between the two countries and outlines the proposed 
 change. Without this knowledge, the detailed argu- 
 ments coukl not be understood. 
 
 4. It defines the meaning of "economic benefit" and 
 exactly designates the agreement as "simultaneous 
 tariff laws" rather than "reciprocity treaty." This is 
 the definition of terms. 
 
 5. It tells the audience, in the last paragraph, the 
 plan of the entire speech. 
 
 6. It definitely states the proposition or object of the 
 speaker, namely, to demonstrate that the pro])osed 
 agreement will be of economic benefit to the United 
 States. 
 
 All this aids the audience to receive and understand 
 the message. Every speech, however, does not have 
 such material covering all these points and grouped to- 
 gether at the very beginning. We shall consider each 
 part of an introduction, to determine just how and when 
 information should be used and wdien omitted. 
 
 (d) Preparatory information is not necessary when 
 llic audience is as w^ell acquainted wdth the general field 
 "as yourself. For instance, if an army surgeon were to 
 read before a medical society a paper on the prevention 
 of typhoid by means of the new^ inoculation treatment, 
 he would not have to explain the nature of the illness 
 
PURPO.se of the IXTRODrCTIOX 59 
 
 or the technique of iiiocukitiiig'. He coiiKl proceed im- 
 mediately to a discussion of the effect of the treatment, 
 knowing- that those listening- would have a good general 
 background of understanding. But if he were to make 
 an address to the soldiers themselves to convince them 
 that they ought to submit to inoculation, then he would 
 have to give them elementary information about medicine. 
 In his introduction he would have to offer a simple ex- 
 planation of the causes of typhoid and the manner in 
 which the disease runs its course. Then he would have 
 to tell how inoculation is accomplished and wdiat it is 
 supposed to do to the organism. After that the soldiers 
 might be expected to follow^ the arguments and under- 
 stand the statistics of successful treatment. In the pas- 
 sage about reciprocity, just quoted, we see a treatment 
 designed for a popular audience and not for a board of 
 specialists who are thoroughly familiar w^tli tariff 
 matters. 
 
 Then there is a second problem. Shall all the infor- 
 mation be given at the beginning or shall it be scattered 
 with the arguments throughout the body of the speech? 
 The advantage of the first is that it gives a good, com- 
 prehensive view of the whole subject. Its disadvantage 
 is that parts might be forgotten when the portions of 
 the development most related to them are reached. To 
 overcome this last objection and yet preserve the advan- 
 tage of the general view at the start, sometimes it is ad- 
 visable to repeat parts of the information — in less 
 extended form — when special points are reached which 
 call for their recollection. Notice how that course w^as 
 pursued in the detailed argument about Portland cement, 
 when the provisions of Schedule D were recalled 
 (page 57). 
 
60 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (b) Definition of tenns also depends upon tlie famil- 
 iarity of the audience with the general field in ^YhLch the 
 speech is included. Yet to define terms at all times is 
 not a grave offense, and it sometimes proves a safeguard 
 against misunderstanding. A speaker (and especially 
 one who is arguing for a cause) must always have very 
 clear terms for his ideas, and he should be careful that 
 the audience gets his exact meaning. It is better to take 
 the chance of giving a definition when it is not absolutely 
 necessary than to omit it when it may be needed. Again, 
 the definitions may be all recorded at the beginning, or 
 they may be introduced in the discussion where they are 
 most needed. 
 
 (c) To announce the plan, or, as it is known in formal 
 argiunent, to state the issues, is a question of policy. The 
 advantage of the course rests in the fact that the audi- 
 tors are given an idea of the end in view and the road 
 by which it is to be reached. If they can be put in pos- 
 session of a simple, general plan, they are better able to 
 follow the amplification and at the same time keep the 
 whole message in mind. The ancient rhetoricians 
 called this part of the speech "the partition." Preachers 
 of the old school were very fond of it and used to depress^' 
 their congregations with an enumeration of the firstly, 
 secondly, thirdly, and so fortli, which were to be treated 
 in the sermon. 
 
 This last reference reminds us of the disadvantages of 
 the partition, or statement of points. It may discourage 
 the audience. In some cases, also, it may rob each later 
 portion of its freshness and charm. Certainly, the pos-. 
 sibility of surprise is diminished. Wherever the speaker 
 is addressing an audience which he knows is unfriendly 
 to his line of reasoning, he should not disclose his plan. 
 
PURPOSE 01^^ THE INTRODUCTION 61 
 
 but should let it develop in their minds as he establishes 
 each point. A captain of industry trying to convince a 
 j;'roup of Socialist workmen of the reasonableness of 
 proiits — if such hardihood can be imagined — sliould keep 
 his plan to himself and endeavor to establish his con- 
 tentions point by point. So also, a Socialist trying- to win 
 over a hostile audience to his belief would be very foolish 
 to announce his plan of procedure beforehand. It would 
 arouse the opposition of his hearers before he had a 
 chance to give his reasons. From these illustrations we 
 see that the announcement of the plan is a device to pro- 
 mote a clear and unified grasp of the entire speech, but it 
 must be used with care; the speaker must put the gain 
 in intellectual grasp in the balance over again the pos- 
 sibility of arousing prejudice. 
 
 (d) The statement of the object or purpose of an ad- 
 dress may also be made only after careful consideration. 
 If the situation is favorable at the ouiset, to a confiding 
 of the purpose of the speaker, if it seems safe to state 
 his beliefs or subject before he proves its reasonableness, 
 then to do so makes for a clear grasp of the development. 
 Sometimes, a speaker reserves the purpose to be accom- 
 plished until the end of the address. Again, he may 
 never reveal it. One of the most powerful kinds of ad- 
 dress is that which influences the hearer by suggestion. 
 The mind is filled with the material which will work it- 
 self out in an action the speaker is wise enough to keep 
 to himself. But though not expressed, the purpose must 
 be very definitely in the thought of the speaker to guie.^ 
 him at every stage. 
 
62 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Summary of Introduction 
 
 (a) Part to secure good will — to get favorable emo- 
 tional state. 
 
 (b) Part to secure attention or concentration. 
 
 '^ (c) Part to prepare the mind to understand — in- 
 tellectual preparation. 
 
 1. General, preliminary information. 
 
 2. Definition of terms. 
 
 3. Partition or announcement of plan. 
 
 4. Statement of subject, purpose, or belief. 
 
 While it lias been made clear that these parts are not 
 always necessary to a speech, and while it has been 
 shown that they may not always be grouped together in 
 the beginning, nevertheless it is best for the novice to 
 follow the summary plan just given above. After he has 
 become somewhat proficient in accomplishing the pur- 
 poses here set forth, in a well-defined part of the speech, 
 lie may then exercise his individuality by variations. It 
 is true that few expert speech-makers follow a formal 
 plan with all these sub-divisions, but they probably did 
 so at first. Thorough drill of this sort insures coherence 
 and unity when flexibility comes as the fruit of experi- 
 ence. But the fluent and easy speaker who has no plan is 
 but a charming and ineffective rambler. He usually 
 leaves the audience with a general sense of pleasure or 
 stimulation but with no definite ideas. 
 
 In conclusion, we may say that, whether these parts 
 of the introduction are each taken up separately or not, 
 their functions must be performed somehow; no speaker 
 can impress his message upon the audience unless he has 
 rendered them favorable to himself and his message, 
 unless he has secured and held thcMr attention and uidess 
 
PURPOSE OF THE INTRODUCTION 63 
 
 he has given them an adequate preparation for the under- 
 standing of the speech. 
 
 Assign MEXT of AVokk 
 
 The writton exercises in this entire lesson sliould be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 First Day. — You have read through the lesson. Now studj^ it 
 again carefully, mastering its contents. Do not attempt any 
 of the exercises until after the second reading. 
 
 Second Day. — Write out a short, startling introduction to a 
 speech on one of the following topics : 
 
 1. The Rich Man in America. 
 
 2. The Practical Influence of the Church on Morality. 
 
 3. The United States in Mexico. 
 
 4. A Poor Plan's Club — the Saloon. 
 
 5. Napoleon. 
 
 At the same time, keep your introduction of a character to 
 incline the audience favorably toward you. 
 
 Third Day. — AVrite a short introduction on one of the topics 
 named in the second day's work or on some other topic of 
 interest to you, using the promise-of-gain method of securing 
 attention. State the kind of audience you imagine you are 
 addressing. 
 
 Fourth Z)« (/.^Reproduce orally the two introductions which you 
 wrote in the second and third days' work. Do it without 
 notes. Do not memorize. 
 
 Fifth Day. — AA^rite a full introduction, with all the type parts, 
 for a speech on a subject of interest to you. Use any one of 
 the following suggestions, or you may select a topic of inter- 
 est to you : 
 
 1. The laiited States ought to pay a sum to Colombia to 
 
 remove any ill-feeling which may have arisen in con- 
 nection with the acquisition of sovereignty over the 
 Canal Zone. 
 
 2. The Germans who fought in th(^ Civil War. 
 
64 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 'A. The Freedom of Speech. 
 
 4. Patriotism. 
 
 5. Any technical subject on which you have special, knowl 
 
 edge ; the speech to be before a non-specialist, mixed 
 
 audience. 
 With your outline of this introduction liefore you, develop it 
 orally many times. Indeed, do the planning and oral amplifica- 
 tion before 3'ou write it out in final form in your notebook. 
 
TEST Ql'ESTIOXS 
 
 These questions are for the stiuk'iit to use in testiii;jj 
 his kno\\ie(l<;-e of the ])rincipk's in this h-sson. Tliey 
 are siinr/rslirr merely, dealing largely with the ])raetical 
 application of the jirinci])les, and are to be ^'l^^'^^l ii^ ^^^6 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. Imagine that you are addressing a small group of people. 
 Explain to them, so they will understand, the three major pur- 
 poses of an introduction. 
 
 2. Give your own definition of attention. Eecall an instance 
 in which, with relaxed attention, you have listened to a speaker. 
 Can you remember what he said ? What, then, is the relation of 
 attention to memory 't 
 
 3. Recall the astonishing exclamations of Beecher, and try to 
 remember speakers whom you have heard use similar devices. 
 
 •4. What other device is used to secure a different kind of 
 attention? What kind is it? What is its advantage?. 
 
 5. What is the appeal to gain in Patrick Henry 's introduction ? 
 
 6. (a) In a speech to sell goods, what might secure attention? 
 (b) In a letter applying for a position, what might secure 
 attention? (c) In a speech for the change of your city gov- 
 ernment to the commission form, what might secure attention? 
 
 7. What is meant by necessary preliminary information? 
 What effect has it upon the reception of the speaker's direct 
 message ? 
 
 8. You can see the necessity of this preliminary information 
 by imagining what preliminary questions you would ask a 
 speaker about such topics as Sixteen to One, Branch Banking, 
 Recognition of Panama, Paying Indemnity to Colombia, Asset 
 Currency, or any other suliject with which you are not familiar. 
 
 9. When is a careful definition of terms particularly necessary ? 
 
 10. Try to define for an average audience the following terms : 
 Efficiency, workmanship, courage, ledgers, balance slieet, sales 
 talks, etc. Take the technical terms of your own vocation witli 
 wliich the audience may not be familiar. 
 
 65 
 
66 TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 11. What are the advantages and the disadvantages of 
 announcing the plan of the speech ? 
 
 12. What are the advantages and the disadvantages of 
 announcing the object or purpose of the speech? 
 
 13. Can you state any reasons why it would be tactful, in a 
 business conference with a manager, for you to introduce pre- 
 liminary information in the most unobtrusive way possible? 
 What risk would you run by leaving it out altogether ? 
 
 14. Suppose that you had been asked to prepare a speech 
 against reciprocity with Canada, in 1911, when the question was 
 before the two countries. Prepare your introduction. 
 
LESSON 5 
 
 GENERAL BASES FOR THE ARRANGEMENT OF MATTER 
 IN THE BODY OF THE SPEECH 
 
 By this time, no doubt, the student has inferred that 
 a speech is always planned with the probable mental 
 state of the audience as a guide. If it is foreseen that 
 the audience is likely to be unfriendly or insufficiently 
 informed, the speaker casts about for the means of 
 remedying these deficiencies. Furthermore, if he dis- 
 covers any unforeseen barriers to the most favorable 
 reception of his message, when he faces the audience or 
 during actual delivery, he readjusts himself and mod- 
 ifies his statements so as to mould the auditors' minds 
 to a state of favorable feeling, acute attention, and intel- 
 ligent insight. 
 
 Since it is most generally probable that such efforts 
 must come at the very beginning, we have considered 
 them as natural parts of an introduction. Yet it is pos- 
 sible that the speaker cannot always prepare for every 
 portion of his entire address at the outset. He may 
 have to make many little or subordinate introductions to 
 new points as they arise during the course of the speech. 
 Still, even though scattered throughout the discourse, 
 these eiTorts are introductory in character, for they seek 
 to prepare the way for something which would not be 
 received without them. Understanding, then, that the 
 formal introduction, when used, may be re-enforced 
 throughout the body of the speech, let us leave the intro- 
 
 67 
 
68 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (luction in order to consider the arrangement of the 
 body. 
 
 General Arrangement of the Body of the Speech 
 
 Naturally enough, the body of a speech differs with 
 every occasion and theme. It is extremely difficult to lay 
 down any but the most general rules for the arrange- 
 ment of the divisions of the message proper. In a later 
 lesson, we shall give directions concerning the details 
 of the body of the speech ; just now only the larger mat- 
 ters of general arrangement will be taken up. 
 
 If the address be very short, the problem is not a 
 serious one; but if it be long, much depends upon the 
 order in which the various points are presented. The 
 introduction may promote the most favorable emotional 
 response and prepare for the easiest intellectual grasp, 
 but the arrangement of the body must be depended 
 upon to preserve these desired ends. Therefore, in de- 
 termining the sequence of material in the body of the 
 speech, be guided by some plan which will dovetail with 
 the efforts of the introduction. Two principles for gen- 
 eral guidance suggest themselves : 
 
 (1) Follow^ the natural divisions of the subject which 
 exist because of the way things hang together in nature. 
 
 (2) Modify or adapt this order to meet the peculiari- 
 ties of the particular audience to be addressed. 
 
 The first of these, if it can be followed, insures a clear 
 grasp of the matter just as it is, irrespective of any- 
 one's bias. The second takes account of the truth that 
 all men are biased and must have their peculiar short- 
 comings made up by the skill of the speaker. 
 
THE BODY OF THE SPEECH 69 
 
 (a) Natural Sequence in the Body of the Speech 
 
 All the things which a speaker may wish to include in 
 the body of his speech have a natural relationship; this 
 relationship should help to determine the order of pre- 
 sentation. Typical relationships are those of time, 
 place, magnitude, and causation. Let us make this 
 clear. 
 
 Relationship of time is the most simple. If we wish to 
 narrate a series of events which followed one after the 
 other, then the simplest arrangement of details is to 
 present them in the order of actual occurrence. Sup- 
 pose your speech to be a eulogy: A man's life is to be 
 reviewed and appreciated. There are two kinds of 
 ideas to be presented to the audience — the concrete facts 
 of the life and the abstract qualities or characteristics 
 which are to be appraised. Evidently the easiest order 
 in which to offer these things is to begin w4th the man's 
 ancestry, then tell of his birth, his childhood, his early 
 education, his young manhood, and his later career, and 
 then close with his death. This is simple, chronological 
 sequence. 
 
 The following extract from Carl Schurz's eulogy of 
 Charles Sumner, delivered in Boston Music Hall, April 
 29, 1874,^ will illustrate. After an introduction in which 
 he spoke of the nation's loss in the death of one of its 
 great senators, the orator mentioned his own friendship 
 for Sumner. Then, remarking that Americans usually 
 liked to speak of their heroes as self-made men, he said : 
 
 But not such a life was that of Charles Sumner. He was 
 descended from good old Kentish yeomanry stock, men stalwart 
 of frame, stout of heart, who used to stand in the front of the 
 
 1 Tn a memorial volume published hy order of the Commonwealth 
 ol Massachusetts, 1874. 
 
70 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 fierce battles of Old England ; and the first of the name who came 
 to America had certainly not been exempt from the rough 
 struggles of the early settlements. But already from the year 
 1723 a long line of Sumners appears on the records of Harvard 
 College, and it is evident that the love of study had long been 
 hereditary in the family. Charles Pickney Sumner, the Senator 's 
 father, was a graduate of Harvard, a lawyer by profession, for 
 fourteen years high sheriff of Suffolk County. His literary 
 tastes and acquirements, and his stately politeness are still 
 remembered. He was altogether a man of high respectability. He 
 was not rich, but in good circumstances, and well able to give 
 his children the best opportunities to study, without working for 
 their daily bread. 
 
 Charles Sumner was born in Boston, on the sixth of January. 
 1811. At the age of ten, he had received his rudimentary training ; 
 at fifteen, after having gone through the Boston Latin School, 
 he entered Harvard College and plunged at once with fervor 
 into the classics, polite literature, and history. Graduated in 
 1830, he entered the Cambridge Law School. Now life began 
 to open for him. Judge Story, his most distinguished teacher, 
 soon recognized in him a young man of uncommon stamp ; and 
 an intimate friendship sprang up between teacher and pupil, 
 which was severed only by death. 
 
 He began to distinguish himself not only by the most ardu- 
 ous industry and application, pushing his researches far beyond 
 the text-books — indeed, text-books never satisfied him — but by a 
 striking earnestness and faculty to master the original principles 
 of the science, and to trace them through its development. 
 
 His productive labor began, and I find it stated that already 
 then, while he was yet a pupil, his essays, published in the 
 "American Jurist," were "always characterized by a 
 breadth of view and accuracy of learning, and sometimes by 
 remarkably subtle and ingenious investigation." 
 
 Leaving the law school, he entered the office of a lawyer in 
 Boston, to acquire a knowledge of practice, never much to his 
 taste. Then he visited Washington for the first time, little 
 dreaming what a theatre of action, struggle, triumph, and suf- 
 fering the Jiational city was to become for him; for then he 
 
THE BODY OP" THE SPEECH 71 
 
 came only as a studious, deeply interested looker-on, who merely 
 desired to form the acquaintance of the justices and practicing 
 lawyers at the bar of tlie Supreme Court. He was received with 
 marked kindness by Chief Justice Marshall, and in later years 
 he loved to tell his friends how he had sat at the feet of that 
 great magistrate, and learned there what a judge should be. 
 
 Having been admitted to the bar in Worcester in 1834, 
 when twenty-three years old, he opened an office in Boston ; was 
 soon appointed reporter of the United States Circuit Court ; 
 published three volumes containing Judge Story's decisions, 
 known as ' ' Sumner 's Reports ' ' ; took Judge Story 's place from 
 time to time as lecturer in Harvard Law School ; also Professor 
 Greenleaf's, who was absent, and edited during the years 1835 
 and 1836 Andrew Dunlap's Treatise on "Admiralty Practice." 
 Beyond this, his studies, arduous, incessant, and thorough, 
 ranged far and wide. 
 
 Truly a studious and laborious young man who took the 
 business of life earnestly in hand, determined to know some- 
 thing, and to be useful to his time and country. 
 
 But what he had learned and could learn at home did not 
 satisfy his craving. In 1837 he went to Europe, armed with a 
 letter from Judge Story's hand to the law magnates of England, 
 to whom his patron introduced him as "a young lawyer giving 
 promise of the most eminent distinction in his profession, with 
 truly extraordinary attainments, literary and judicial, and a 
 gentleman of the highest purity and propriety of character." 
 
 This was not a mere complimentary introduction ; it was the 
 conscientious testimony of a great judge who well knew his 
 responsibility, and who afterwards, when his death approached, 
 adding to that testimony, was frequently heard to say, "I shall 
 die content, as far as my professorship is concerned, if Charles 
 Sumner is to succeed me. ' ' 
 
 In England, young Sumner, only feeling himself standing 
 on the threshold of life, was received like a man of already 
 achieved distinction. Every circle of a society, ordinarily so 
 exclusive, was open to him. Often, by invitation, he sat with 
 the judges in Westminster Hall. Renowned statesmen intro- 
 duced him upon the floor of Parliament. Eagerly he followed 
 
72 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the debates, and studied the principles and practices of parlia- 
 mentary law on its maternal soil, where from the first seed-corn 
 it had grown up into a magnificent tree, in whose shadow a 
 great people can dwell in secure enjoyment of their rights. 
 Scientific associations received him as a welcome guest, and the 
 learned and great willingly opened to his winning presence 
 their stores of knowledge and statesmanship. 
 
 In France he listened to the eminent men of the Law School 
 in Paris, at the Sorbonne and the College de France, and with 
 many of the statesmen of that country he maintained instruc- 
 tive intercourse. In Italy he gave himself up to the charms of 
 art, poetry, history, and classical literature. In Germany he 
 enjoyed the conversation of Humboldt, of Ranke, the historian, 
 of Ritter, the geographer, and of the great journalists, Savigny, 
 Thibaut, and ^littermaier. * * * 
 
 He returned to his native shores in 18-10, himself like a 
 heavily freighted ship, bearing a rich cargo of treasures col- 
 lected in foreign lands. 
 
 He resumed the practice of law in Boston; but, as I find 
 it stated, "not with remarkable success from a financial point 
 of view." That I readily believe. The financial point of view 
 was never to him a fruitful source of inspiration. Again he 
 devoted himself to the more congenial task of teaching at the 
 Cambridge Law School and of editing an American edition of 
 "Vesey's Reports," in twenty volumes, M'ith elaborate notes 
 contributed by himself. 
 
 But now the time had come when a new field of action was 
 to open itself to him. On the Fourth of July, 1845, he delivered 
 before the city authorities of Boston, an address on the "True 
 Grandeur of Nations." So far he had been only a student — 
 a deep and arduous one, and a writer and a teacher, but nothing 
 more. On that day his public career commenced. 
 
 This chronological order is continued throughout the 
 long speech. But it must be noticed that Schurz is not 
 satisfied with a mere encylopedic statement of bare 
 facts ; he makes them render up their testimony concern- 
 ing the character of Sumner. Tliroughout the address, 
 
THE BODY OF THE SPEECH 73 
 
 he makes them show that Sumner was a man of (a) dil- 
 igent application, (b) wide learning, and (c) high ideals 
 and that he viewed all problems from the lofty eminence 
 of those ideals. 
 
 This chronological order is the simplest possible; it 
 therefore imposes least upon the skill of the speaker. 
 But it has the danger l)TT5mig^~l3arreir^incl tiresome. 
 Too often a mere string of colorless happenings is re- 
 corded. Although the simple order may be followed, 
 use some judgment in the matter of emphasizing this 
 event and subordinating that, and of extracting an in- 
 terpretation of the spirit. 
 
 Place gives us the next hint of arrangement. Ob- 
 viously, it is useful only when dealing with things which 
 distribute themselves in space. Place dictates that when 
 describing a magnificent building, we begin, let us say, 
 from the top and proceed downward in treating the de- 
 tails, or that we begin at the bottom and go up. In either 
 case, there is an orderly and systematic succession of 
 details wdiich tends to bring about a unified grasp of the 
 whole. 
 
 Sometimes in memorial or historical addresses, the 
 sequence in time is set aside in favor of a grouping ac- 
 cording to place. Thus if one w^ere narrating the Civil 
 War campaign of 1863, instead of telling of each battle 
 on the date it occurred, he might well group the engage- 
 ments somewdiat as follows: (a) The campaign in the 
 East with its climax at Gettysburg, (b) the campaign 
 in the West with the taking of Vicksburg and the open- 
 ing of the Mississippi River, (c) the war in the middle 
 ground of Kentucky and Tennessee, including the en- 
 gagements at Chattanooga and Chickamauga and the 
 storming of IMissionary Eidge. 
 
/ v_- 
 
 74 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Such an arrangement is a safeguard against confu- 
 sion. On the other hand, to enumerate the various en- 
 gagements of the year according to the calendar, now 
 one in the East, then two on the Mississippi, back again 
 to the East, then three in close succession in Kentucky, 
 and so on, would give only the perplexing impression of 
 a tangled mass of details. The suggested grouping 
 makes for a rational and clear grasp of each particular, 
 properly placed in an organized whole. 
 
 Magnitude is the qualitative or mathematical rela- 
 tionship. One of a group of similar things is smaller or 
 greater, less important or more important, than another. 
 Sometimes it is wise to group the details of the body of 
 a speech according to their magnitude. The climax is 
 such a grouping, for it begins with the least impressive 
 and then proceeds in an ascending scale to the most im- 
 pressive. Other variations based on a difference in 
 magnitude readily suggest themselves. AVe find a good 
 example of climax in Burke's speech impeaching War- 
 ren Hastings. The whole speech is too long to quote, 
 but this extract from the conclusion will indicate a plan 
 for use in the body of the address : 
 
 Therefore it is with confidence that, ordered by tlie 
 Commons^ 
 
 I impeach Warren Hastings, Esquire, of high crimes and 
 misdemeanors. 
 
 1 impeach him in the name of the Commons, in Parliament 
 assembled, whose parliamentary trust ho has betrayed. 
 
 I impeach him in the name of all the Commons of Great 
 Britain, whose national character he has dishonored. 
 
 I impeach him in the name of the people of India, whose 
 laws, rights, and liberties he has subverted; whose properties 
 he has destroyed ; whose country he has laid waste and desolate. 
 
THE BODY OF THE SPEECH 75 
 
 I impeach him in the name and by virtue of those eternal 
 laws of justice which he has viohited. 
 
 I impeach him in the name of hunuin nature itself, which 
 he has cruelly outraged, injured, and oppressed, in both sexes, 
 in every age, rank, situation, and condition of life. 
 
 Such a speech would proceed from the proof of rela- 
 tively minor matters of civil offense to a climax of crim- 
 inal outrage far beyond the pale of excuse or forgive- / 
 
 ness. _ / 
 
 Causation is the relation which exists between causes ^ 
 
 and their effects. The arrangement may be, first the 
 causes and then the effects, or it may be reversed. In 
 the arguments of criminal lawyers, we often find the 
 body of the speech to be arranged as follow^s: 
 
 (a) Causes. 
 
 1. Motives. 
 
 2. Opportunity. 
 
 (b) Effect — the crime. 
 
 (c) Traces or evidence of the crime. 
 
 Nearly all the orators who spoke of the Boston Mas- 
 sacre, used the cause-and-effect arrangement. No doubt 
 the student will recollect the accounts of the quartering 
 of British troops in Boston in 1770. Between them and 
 the citizens there grew up a strong animosity which led 
 to minor disturbances and to frequent brawls. But on 
 the evening of March 5, 1770, a violent outbreak oc- 
 curred. The troops fired upon the citizens, killing sev- 
 eral. For a number of years, the anniversary of this 
 event was celebrated, one of the features of the day 
 being an oration. These exercises were kept up until 
 1783, when they were replaced by Fourth of July exer- 
 cises and orations. Most of the Boston Massacre 
 speeches discussed : 
 
76 p:ffective public speaking 
 
 (a) Causes which led up to the massacre. 
 
 1. Acts of despotism, oppression, and taxes. 
 
 2. The quartering troops in the town. 
 
 (b) Immediate effect — the massacre. 
 
 (c) Final effect — the attitude of resentment on the 
 
 part of the colonies and a justification of senti- 
 ments of freedom. 
 While these four typical relationships of time, place, 
 magnitude, and causation are very fundamental, still 
 any other classification of the way your matter hangs 
 together in nature will serve as a basis for the arrange- 
 ment of the body of the speech. For instance, if you are 
 to support a bill, like the act favoring reciprocity with 
 Canada, mentioned in Lesson Four, you may take the 
 order of the provisions of the bill as the plan for the 
 body of your speech. In this case, the bill has four 
 schedules ; then you Uiay make the body of your speech 
 correspond to them in sequence by taking them up in 
 regular order — A, B, C, D. 
 
 Another point to be noted is that while the great di- 
 visions of 3^our discussion imxy follow one basis of 
 arrangement, any of the further subdivisions might 
 follow another. Thus in appealing to Congress to give 
 the Filipinos their independence, we might make a 
 primary arrangement as follows : 
 
 1. The Filipinos are now able to govern themselves. 
 
 2. To retain them longer is financially unprofitable. 
 
 3. To retain them opens us to easy attack in time of 
 
 war. 
 
 4. To retain them longer is a violation of our national 
 
 ideals of freedom. 
 This is an arrangement according to magnitude or 
 importance of the various considerations. But the sub- 
 
THE BODY OP THE SPEECH 77 
 
 divisions under tliose heads niiglii follow one of the 
 other types. Take the first of these primary divisions 
 and notice the following sub-arrangement as a cause-to- 
 effect argument. 
 
 1. The Filipinos are now able to govern themselves, 
 because : 
 
 (a) Education (cause) has raised their general in- 
 
 telligence (effect) since 1898. 
 
 (b) English as a common language (cause) has 
 
 brought them to a state of harmonious co- 
 operation (effect). 
 
 (c) A measure of participation in the general gov- 
 
 ernment (cause) and complete control of 
 local governments (cause) has rendered 
 their leaders sufficiently expert to conduct 
 their own government in a state of freedom 
 (effect). 
 These and other plans may be followed in the arrange- 
 ment. Whatever type or combination you may select 
 to guide you in the ordering of details in the body of 
 the speech, let it be well defined and calculated to reveal 
 the truth as it actually exists. 
 
 (h) Modified Arranr/emenf to Suit a Particidar Audience 
 
 Yet the combination of things as they normally hang 
 together in nature is not always the best gTiide in arrang- 
 ing them for a presentation to a particular audience. 
 Sometimes a variation from the natural order will pro- 
 mote an easier understanding of the material. Thus, 
 in the reciprocity speech, from which extracts were pre- 
 sented in the last lesson, we find these words immediately 
 following the first quotation given : 
 
78 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 But I shall not follow the order of the bill. It will be 
 simpler to begin with Schedule D, for that schedule is the 
 easiest to comprehend and analyze. Its provisions call for the 
 least change from the existing order of things. It enumerates 
 articles produced extensively in the United States and to a 
 considerably less degree or not at all in Canada. The artich^s 
 are cement, trees, condensed milk, biscuits, canned fruits, pea- 
 nuts, and bituminous coal. All together they constitute about 
 one quarter of the volume of the commodities to be affected by 
 the entire agreement. This estimate is based on last year's 
 exportation figures; but with the dropping of the Canadian 
 duty on them as proposed, no one can tell to what enormous 
 proportions their shipment may grow. 
 
 Then followed the second, detailed argument quoted 
 in the last lesson. Throughout the rest of this speech, 
 wdiicli is too long to be given complete, there is a modi- 
 fication of the order of the bill to promote clearness for 
 a popular audience. 
 
 Sometimes the diatural order is not the most tactful 
 when the prejudices or feelings of the particular lis- 
 teners are considered. In pleading for Filipino inde- 
 pendence, it might be wise to show first that their furthei- 
 retention would mean increased financial loss. If the 
 money side of such a question can be so disposed of, most 
 audiences are likely to respond to altruistic inducements. 
 Or, if you could not prove a financial advantage in giving 
 the Filipinos" their freedom, you might make military 
 safety your first issue. After that has been driven home, 
 the question of their fitness to govern themselves could 
 ])e taken up. Naturally these modifications need not be 
 made if the audience is without bias, and the nature of 
 the modifications depends upon the nature of the exist- 
 ing bias. 
 
 Thus, in planning the body of his address, a speaker 
 
THE BODY OF THE SPEECIT. / 79 
 
 endeavors to put himself in the phice of his hearers. He 
 tries to estimate their beliefs, their prejudices, their 
 feelings. He asks himself, "How should I want to be 
 approached upon this subject if I felt about if as these 
 people do \ ' ' 
 
 Consider the following plan as illustrating how the 
 natural order may be varied to suit the prejudices and 
 the beliefs of the audience. A socialist is speaking in 
 behalf of his cause to an audience opposed to the socialist 
 program. An excellent order of procedure is as follows : 
 
 A. Introduction 
 
 Facts and figures showing the startling growth of 
 the socialist party in the United States. Con- 
 sequently it is to the interest of all citizens to 
 study a propaganda which is influencing the 
 political thought of the country. 
 
 B. Body 
 
 1. Answer to certain objections that lie in the mind 
 
 of the audience. 
 
 (a) Socialism does not propose to reduce all men 
 
 to a level of mediocrity. 
 
 (b) Socialism does not mean anarchism. 
 
 (c) Socialism does not mean agnosticism. 
 
 (d) Socialism does not propose to abolish pri- 
 
 vate ow^nership entirely. 
 
 2. The common nse by society of the fundamental 
 
 socialistic principles. 
 
 (a) They are used in charitable institutions. 
 
 (b) They are used in mutual insurance compa- 
 
 nies. 
 
 (c) They are used in public ownersliip of post 
 
 office. 
 
80 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (d) They are used in profit-sharing e x p e r i - 
 nieiits. 
 3. The constructive program of socialism. 
 
 (a) Socialism aims to secure equality of oppor- 
 
 tunity. 
 
 (b) Socialism aims to give labor its share of the 
 
 profits of industry. 
 
 (c) Socialism aims to secure the public owner- 
 
 ship of the natural monopolies of produc- 
 tion and distribution. 
 C. Conclusion 
 
 Therefore it is advisable for all thoughtful citizens 
 to accept the doctrine or at least give it further, 
 careful consideration. 
 Naturally an opponent of socialism would take just the 
 reverse course. 
 
 SUMMAEY 
 
 Thus, we seek to plan the body of the speech so that 
 all its material will grow up in the mind of the hearer 
 in a manner most calculated to make him understand it 
 as it is understood by the speaker himself. 
 
 Careful arrangement is the device which he uses to suit 
 the limited understanding or the prejudiced feelings of 
 the auditors. It aims to preserve during the piecemeal 
 delivery of the message all the advantage gained by a 
 successful introduction. The type arrangements sug- 
 gested have been : 
 A. Follow the order of natural relationship: 
 
 1. According to time — esjiecially in narrative work. 
 
 2. According to place — especially in description. 
 
 3. According to magnitude or impressiveness — espe- 
 
 cially in appeals to action. 
 
THE BODY OF THE SPEECH 81 
 
 4. According to cause and effect — especially in argu- 
 
 ment. 
 
 5. According to any special plan inherent in the topic. 
 B. Modify this order to accommodate the peculiarities 
 
 of the particular audience : 
 
 1. Peculiarities of limited understanding. 
 
 2. Peculiarities of bias or emotional opposition. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exorcises in this entire lesson should he 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in voui- notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson again carefully to master its con- 
 tents. Answer the test questions appended, to determine 
 if you have grasped the ideas to be learned. 
 
 Second Day. — In the speech of Garfield (Lesson 3, page 33), 
 what type arrangement is used from the first star (*) to 
 the second stars (**) ? What tj^pe is used from the twci 
 stars to the end? Study the Conkling speech (Lesson 2, 
 page 20) again. Its body treats, first, a need, and, second. 
 a man to meet the need. What type plan is this? What 
 IS the plan of the subdivisions under the ma/i-division ? 
 
 Third Day. — Take the following plans; modify them to suit 
 some special audience ; add the necessary introductions and 
 develop them orally. Do this at first with the notes before 
 you and then with the outline kept in the mind only. 
 
 I. Abraham Lincoln. 
 
 (a) His physical nature. 
 
 (b) His mental nature. 
 
 (c) His spiritual nature. 
 
 II. The ]\riners' Strike in Colorado (1914). 
 
 (a) Causes of the trouble. 
 
 (b) Actions of both sides during the strike. 
 
 (c) A basis of settlement. 
 
82 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 III. Reorganization of the department or business in which 
 
 you are employed. (Make your own plan through- 
 out.) 
 
 IV. Causes and Conduct of the Mexican War of 18-47. 
 
 Speech in commemoration of those who died in that 
 war. (Make your own plan throughout.) For ex- 
 ercise purposes, a brief account of the war can be 
 had in any good encyclopoedia. Consult one in the 
 nearest library. For a finished speech, the matter 
 should be read up most thoroughly. 
 Fourth and Fifth Days. — Taking as your model, the portion 
 of Schurz's "Eulogy of Sumner" in this lesson, construct 
 a eulogy of one of the following or of some other great man 
 with whose life you are familiar. 
 
 (a) Alexander Hamilton. 
 
 (b) Karl Marx. 
 
 (c) Henry George. 
 
 (d) Daniel Webster. 
 
 (e) Robert E. Lee. 
 
 Supplement the plan you construct with a statement of the 
 type followed. // ijou wish, you may also prepare an amplifica- 
 tion of the outline. But do not get the idea that all speeches 
 must be first written out. Rather cultivate the habit of 
 developing your outlines orally. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 Tlieso questions are for the student to use in testinji 
 liis knowle<l<ie of the principles in tliis lesson. They 
 are /iiififiesfirc merely, dealing largely with tlie practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. Why should the body of a speech be carefully planned? 
 
 2. What is there in the first paragraph of this lesson to lead 
 you to believe that no speaker can attain the highest success 
 unless he develops the power of easy, extemporaneous coni- 
 I)osition ? In what way is a man who is confined to what he has 
 memorized, limited? 
 
 3. How definitely can we lay down rules for the body of a 
 sp;ceh? 
 
 4. What is meant by the "natural order" of presentation? 
 
 5. Why are the relationsliips of time, place, magnitude, and 
 ""causation called typical relationships? 
 
 6. Give orally a clear explanation of the meaning of each of 
 tliese four terms. Imagine that you are addressing an audience. 
 
 7. AVhat do you think of Carl Schurz's style? Is it flowery? 
 Is it clear? If it is a pleasing style, why? 
 
 8. Suppose that Schurz had taken magnitude of characteris- 
 tics as the basis of his plan so that it would be as follows : 
 
 I. Sumner was a man of pleasing presence. 
 II. He was always a most diligent student. 
 III. He was a man of high ideals. 
 
 lY. He made service to mankind, guided by these ideals, 
 his life work. 
 What would have been the basis for the arrangement of the 
 matter in each of the subdivisions? 
 
 9. What advantage is there in giving all the effects before 
 coming to the causes? What are the disadvantages? What 
 advantage is there in reversing the order? (The answer to this 
 is not expressed in the lesson-, it is just a question to set you 
 thinking.) 
 
 83 
 
84 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 10. AVhat peculiarities of an audience soixietimes call for con- 
 sideration in planning the body of the speech? Recall the 
 outline for a Socialist address. How does the plan of the 
 speech suit peculiarities in the audience? How might you plan 
 a prohibition speech for a typical German audience? How 
 plan a "personal freedom" speech for an audience of clergy- 
 men ? 
 
 11. Describe some other specific speech occasions where the 
 speaker would have to modify his plan because of the nature 
 of his audience. 
 
LESSON 6 
 
 THE CONCLUSION 
 
 Recapitulation of Other Divisions of the Speech 
 
 Having discussed the arrangement of the introduction 
 and of the body of a speech, we now come to the conclu- 
 sion. Possibly it might be well to pause for a time 
 to consider the origin of the standard divisions of a 
 speech and to exi:»lain some terms which are constantly 
 met in the literature on the subject. 
 
 History reports, as the first writer on public speaking, 
 one Corax who lived in Sicily'when that island was a 
 colony of ancient Greece. His book, known as "The 
 Art" {rexi'rj), appeared about 446 years before Christ. 
 It was he who first gave rules for the arrangement of 
 the parts of a speech. Although Aristotle and later 
 writers improved on his work, still through all the ages 
 his general ideas have been accepted. Modern students 
 have added to our understanding of why this or that 
 should be done in a speech, but they have contributed 
 but little to the hoiv. 
 
 Corax named five great divisions of a speech: (1) 
 the proem or opening; (2) the narration or statement 
 of facts; (3) the argument proper; (4) subsidiary re- 
 marks; and (5) the peroration, or close. Let us take 
 up these terms and see how they correspond with others 
 which are sometimes employed and most especially with 
 those which we ourselves use. 
 
 The Greek w^ord proem designates that part of our 
 85 
 
86 
 
 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 introduction which tries to get a favorable emotional 
 response, while the second division of Corax, the narra- 
 tion, is very similar to the portion which we look upon 
 as necessary to give facts to help the understanding 
 of the message proper. There is another word, more 
 common than proem, which is often used. It is the 
 Latin word exordium. It also carries with it the notion 
 of an opening which seeks pleasant relationships. It 
 does not designate the part with the educational func- 
 tion. Therefore our term, introduction, covers all that 
 is meant by proem and exordium, and more. The fol- 
 lowing comparison shows all the parts given by Corax 
 and the standard rhetoricians, as well as the simpler 
 treatment we have adopted : 
 
 
 Corax 
 
 
 Standard 
 
 
 Simplified 
 
 1. 
 
 Proem 
 
 1. 
 
 Exordium 
 
 A. 
 
 Introduction 
 
 2. 
 
 Narration 
 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 
 Narration 
 Partition 
 Definition 
 Statement of 
 Object 
 
 
 
 3. 
 
 Argument 
 
 6. 
 
 Argument 
 
 B. 
 
 Body 
 
 4. 
 
 Subsidiary i-e- 7. 
 
 Digression 
 
 
 
 
 marks 
 
 
 
 
 
 5. 
 
 Peroration 
 
 8. 
 
 Peroration 
 
 C. 
 
 Conclusion 
 
 Notice that we have not mentioned digression or sub- 
 sidiary remarks as a division of the speech. At best 
 such a portion is but a form of literary amplification or 
 relief which is included in tlie treatment of the body ol 
 the speech. It is not legitimately a main division of the 
 well-planned speech. 
 
THE CONCLUSION 87 
 
 iNTRODUCnON TO THE StUDY OF THE CONCLUSION 
 
 Now Ave come to a detailed treatment of the last part 
 of the speech, or the conchision. To be sure, sometimes 
 there is no formal conclusion, for none is either neces- 
 sary or apin-oi)riate. In such a case, the speaker is 
 concerned only with the problem of saying his last words 
 gracefully and precisely and then sitting down. But 
 now we shall treat the conclusion as a definite division 
 of the speech where it is a necessary and eifective part. 
 The old term peroration suggests a highly emotional 
 flight of oratory. Sometimes such an outburst is a suit- 
 able and desirable form of ending, but the conclusion 
 should by no means always be of this character. Fur- 
 thermore, even when it may have such a nature, it may 
 also have something else connected with a ditTerent func- 
 tion. Just as the exordium, or feeling part, of the intro- 
 duction does not necessarily complete all the introduc- 
 tory effort, so the peroration, or fervid part, is not all 
 the conclusion. 
 
 General Purpose of the Conclusion 
 
 It has been well said that the last part of a speech to 
 be worked out is the introduction. We may add that 
 the first part to have in mind is the conclusion. It is 
 nearest to what you are aiming to accomplish ; it drives 
 home your purpose. Therefore, the conclusion is the 
 part you must conceive first ; you are building toward it 
 throughout your whole speech. The introduction is 
 farthest from your real object. It is put in as a neces- 
 sary concession to the peculiarities and prejudices of 
 your audience. From an ideal point of view — where 
 
88 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 you proceed in the straightest line to the heart of your 
 purpose — the introduction is an unfortunate, though nec- 
 essary, waste of time. 
 
 A good conclusion should accomplish two things: (1) 
 it should concentrate all the impressions of the entire 
 speech so that the audience gets them in combined, uni- 
 fied force; and (2) it should apply the message in such 
 a way as to make the audience feel as you want them to 
 feel or do what you wan! them to do. It should act as a 
 burning glass to concentrate all the rays to a point 
 where they can do the maximum work and make the 
 deepest impression. 
 
 (a) The Conclusion as a Sunniiari/ 
 
 Let us suppose that the speech has been a long, care- 
 ful, detailed argument. Every statement has been most 
 thoroughly backed up and proved. During the course of 
 the speech the listeners have been paying attention to 
 details. They have been saying to themselves: "Yes, 
 that is true"; "Well, he ought to give more evidence 
 there"; "Ah, noAv he has supported his statement"; 
 and so on. They have been checking up the points as 
 they were presented and amplified. Such an attention 
 to details makes the hearer forget the general trend 
 of the arg-ument and even dims his recollection of the 
 details other than those in the focus of attention. Con- 
 sequently, at the end of such an argument, it is well to 
 gather together all the established conclusions, unclouded 
 by the details of proof, and ])resciit them grouped so 
 that their combined force is a])])arent. As the auditor 
 hears the great issues marshaled in review, his mind 
 interprets them and he accepts tln^n because of the 
 
THE CONOLTTSION 89 
 
 proof previously applied. What was scattered, is now 
 c'oinbined. 
 
 The Formal Siimmary. — The formal summary corre- 
 sponds in content with the statement of plan or issues 
 in the introduction; it usually dilTers in stjde of treat- 
 ment. Thus, if one were to make a speech in favor of 
 the closed shop, he might say in his introduction: "I 
 intend to show three things : That the closed shop is 
 beneficial to workman inside and outside the union, that 
 the closed shop benefits the employer, and that it benefits 
 the consuming public." Then, after elaborately prov- 
 ing each item in detail, he might summarize in the con- 
 clusion as follows: "Therefore, the closed shop not 
 only changes workmen from machines to human beings, 
 but it makes them better agents of production, thus giv- 
 ing the employer more goods for each unit of labor he 
 hires. It raises the standard of employment and pay 
 for all men whether they be organized or not. The con- 
 suming public is able to purchase commodities of a 
 higher grade, produced in steady flow to meet the demand 
 and never interfered with by strikes or other disagree- 
 ments between the master and the man. All factors of 
 production and consumption working together in this 
 manner make for the happiness and progress of the 
 race. ' ' 
 
 Notice the summary used by Burke in his speech 
 impeaching War: en Hastings, page 74 of Lesson 5. 
 
 The poorest k'nd of summary is the mere repetition of 
 the issues as given in the introduction. If such a state- 
 ment has been made in the introduction and a summary 
 seems desirable, then it should treat the considerations 
 from a different angle or light them up with feeling 
 
90 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 which could not properly have been shown at the out- 
 set. 
 
 The following concluding v/ords of Wendell Phillips' 
 eloquent eulogy of Daniel O'Connell give an excellent 
 summary colored with feeling. 
 
 For thirty restless and turbulent years he stood in front 
 of them (the Irish people) and said, "Remember, he that com- 
 mits a crime, helps the enemy." And during that long and 
 fearful struggle, I do not remember one of his followers ever 
 being convicted of a political offence, and during this period, 
 crimes of violence were very rare. There is no such record in 
 our history. Neither in classic nor in modern times can the 
 man be produced who held a million of people in his right 
 hand so passive. It was due to the consistency and unity of 
 a character that had hardly a flaw. I do not forget your sol- 
 diers, orators, or poets, — any of your leaders. But when I 
 consider O'Connell's personal disinterestedness — his rare, brave 
 fidelity to every cause his principles covered, no matter how 
 unpopular, or how embarassing to his main purpose, — that 
 clear, far-reaching vision, and true heart, which, on most moral 
 and political questions set him so much ahead of his times; his 
 eloquence, almost equally effective in the courts, in the senate, 
 and before the masses; that sagacity which set at naught the 
 malignant vigilance of the whole imperial bar, watching for 
 thirty years for a misstep ; when I remember that he invented 
 his tools, and then measure his limited means with his vast 
 success, bearing in mind its nature ; when I see the sobriety and 
 moderation with which he used his measureless power, and the 
 lofty, generous purpose of his whole life, — I am feady to affirm 
 that he was, all things considered, the greatest man tlie Ii-ish 
 race ever produced. 
 
 The entire speech is too long to print here in full. 
 But the student would do well to read it all, if accessible, 
 as an example of eulogy and to note how the summary 
 
THE CONCLUSION 91 
 
 just quoted drives home the combined impressions (>f 
 the whole speech. 
 
 The summary is usually more justitied if the issues 
 or plan have not been announced in the introduction. In 
 short speeches, it is obvious that a formal and detailed 
 summary is unnecessary. So also in humorous speeches 
 where the purpose is general good feeling rather than 
 concise grasp of an organized message, the summary 
 as illustrated may be omitted. 
 
 The Short, Crisp Summary. — Sometimes the formal 
 summary enumerating all issues is omitted, but a short, 
 crisp, or epigrammatic resume takes its place. Again, 
 the terse summary is used to supplement the formal one. 
 It puts the whole contention in a nutshell. After his long 
 argument about the actions, political and military, of 
 Great Britain, Patrick Henry crisply summarized his 
 call to arms (just before making the passionate appeal) 
 with the words : "We must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must 
 fight. An appeal to arms and the God of hosts is all 
 that is left us." 
 
 Senator Elihu Root summarized in a very terse and 
 effective way his speech advocating the repeal of the 
 bill giving United States coast-w^ise vessels an advantage 
 in Panama Canal tolls. After proving that such a pref- 
 erence to our vessels was in violation of our solemn 
 promises in two treaties with Great Britain — treaties 
 which we ourselves sought to contract, and after show- 
 ing that we have agreed to arbitrate such differences in 
 matters of treaty interpretation with Great Britain, he 
 said: "Mr. President, there is but one alternative con- 
 sistent with self-respect. We must arbitrate the in- 
 terpretation of this treaty or we must retire from the 
 position we have taken." 
 
92 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (h) Conchision as an Application or Pcioratiun 
 
 But a summary of the contents of the speech is not 
 always the whole conclusion. Often one wishes to make 
 a general application of the message, draw a moral, or 
 bring the whole close to the life and feelings of the audi- 
 ence. This is bringing it home to them. Note the con- 
 clusion of Carl Schurz's speech on ''True Americanism," 
 delivered at Faneuil Hall, Boston, in 1859. 
 
 Sir, I was to speak on Republicanism in the West, and so 
 I did. This is Western Republicanism. These are its principles, 
 and I am proud to say that its principles are its policies. These 
 are the ideas which have rallied around the banner of liberty 
 not only the natives of tlie soil, but also an innumerable host 
 of Germans, Scandinavians, Scotchmen, Frenchmen, and a 
 goodly number of Irishmen also. And here I tell you, those 
 are mistaken who believe that the Irish heart is devoid of those 
 noble impulses which will lead him to the side of justice, where 
 he sees his own rights respected and unendangered. (Applause.) 
 Under this banner, all the languages of civilized mankind are 
 spoken; every creed is protected; every right is sacred. There 
 stands every element of Western society, with enthusiasm for 
 a great cause, with confidence in each other, with honor to 
 themselves. This is the banner floating over the glorious valley 
 which stretches from the Western slope of the Alleghanies to 
 the Rocky ]\Iountains— that valley of Jehosaphat, where the 
 nations of the world assemble to celebrate the resurrection of 
 human freedom. (Tremendous rpplause.) The inscription on 
 the banner is not, "Opposition to the Democratic party for 
 the sake of placing a new set of men in office"; for this battle 
 cry of speculators, our hearts have no response. Nor is it 
 "Restriction of slavery and restriction of the right of suffrage," 
 for this — l)elieve my words, I entreat you — this would be the 
 signal for deserved, inevitable, and disgraceful defeat. But the 
 inscription is "Liberty and equal rights, common to all as the 
 
THE CONCLUSION 93 
 
 air of Heaven — Liberty and equal rights, one and inseparable." 
 (Prolonged cheers.) 
 
 AVith this banner we stand before the world. In this sign — 
 in this sign alone and no other — there is victory. And thus, sir, 
 we mean to realize the great cosmopolitan idea, upon which the 
 existence of the American nation rests. Thus we mean to ful- 
 fill the great mission of true Americanism — thus we mean to 
 answer the anxious question of down-trodden humanity — 
 ■'Plas man any faculty to be free and to govern himself?" The 
 answer is a triumphant "Aye," thundering into the ears of 
 tlie despots of the old world that "a man is a man for a' that" — 
 proclaiming to the oppressed that they are held in subjection 
 on false pretenses, cheering the hearts of the despondent friends 
 of man with consolation and renewed confidence. 
 
 This is true Americanism, clasping mankind to its great 
 heart. Under its banner we march ; let the world follow. 
 
 Here the particular points which he developed in the 
 l)ody of his speech are applied and coupled with certain 
 ideals and sentiments in which Americans take pride. 
 The specific cases are dropped and the oratory branches 
 out into broad and almost poetic fields of universal and 
 undying interest. It is this tendency to look beyond the 
 narrow particulars of the immediate subject to its wider 
 applications, which makes perorations so poetic and so 
 attractive for declamatory purposes. 
 
 Sometimes, this broadening of the treatment takes the 
 form of leaving the details which go to make up the 
 opinion established by the speech and treating, in an 
 enthusiastic manner, the broad principles involved. In 
 his famous second reply to Hayne, Daniel Webster dealt 
 with specific acts and rules of constitutional law in the 
 body of his speech, but his peroration was as follows : 
 
 I profess, sir, in my career hitherto, to have kept steadily in 
 view the prosperity and honor of the whole country, and tha 
 
94 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 preservation of our Federal Union. It is to that Union we owe 
 our safety at lionn', and our consideration anil dignity abroad. 
 It is to that Union that we are chiefly indebted for whatever 
 makes us most proud of our country. That Union we reached 
 only by the discipline of our virtues in the severe school of 
 adversity. It had its origin in the necessities of disordered 
 finance, prostrate commerce, and ruined credit. Under its 
 benign influences, these great interests immediately awoke as 
 from the dead, and sprang forth with newness of life. Every 
 year of its duration has teemed with fresh proofs of its utility 
 and blessings; and although our territory has stretched out 
 wider and wider, and our population spread farther and far- 
 ther, they have not outrun its protection or its benefits. It has 
 been to us a copious fountain of national, social, and personal 
 happiness. 
 
 I have not allowed myself, sir, to look beyond the Union, to 
 see what might lie hidden in the dark recesses behind. I have 
 not coolly weighed the chances of preserving liberty when the 
 l)onds that unite us together shall be broken asunder. I have not 
 accustomed myself to hang over the precipice of disunion, to see 
 whether, with my short sight, I can fathom the depths of the abyss 
 below ; nor could I regard him as a safe counselor in the affairs 
 of this government, whose thought would l)e mainly bent on con- 
 sidering, not how the Union may be best preserved, but how 
 tolerable might be the condition of the people when it should 
 l)e broken up and destroyed. 
 
 While the Union lasts, we have high, gratifying, exciting 
 prospects spread out before us, for us and our children. Beyond 
 that I seek not to penetrate the veil. God grant that, in my 
 (hiy, at least, that curtain may not rise! God grant that on my 
 vision never may be opened what lies behind ! When my eyes 
 shall be turned to behold for the last time the sun in heaven, 
 may I not see him shining on the broken and dishonored frag- 
 ments of a once glorious Union, on states dissevered, discordant, 
 belligerent; on a land rent with civil feuds, or di-enched, it may 
 be, in fraternal blood ! Let their last feeble and lingering glance 
 rather bcliold the gorgeous ensign of llic I'cpublic, now known 
 and honored lliroiigliout Ihc cj'.i'th, still full lii.uh advanced, 
 
THE CONCLUSION 95 
 
 its arms and trophies streaming in their original luster, not a 
 stripe erased nor polluted, nor a single star obscured, bearing 
 for its motto no such miserable interrogatory as, '"Wliat is all 
 tills worth r' nor those other words of delusion and folly, "Lib- 
 erty first and Union afterwards"; but everywhere, spi-ead all 
 over in characters of living light, blazing on all its ample folds, 
 as they float over the sea and over the land, and in every wind 
 in the whole heavens, that other sentiment dear to every true 
 American heart — Liberty and LTnion, now and forever, one and 
 inseparable ! 
 
 It is this tendency to take a universal point of vievv^ in 
 the peroration which has led many speakers to use not 
 only poetic diction and imagerj^ but even actual ex- 
 tracts from poetry itself. An example is to be found 
 in the peroration of Henry W. Grady's "New South," 
 an oration often quoted. 
 
 Now what answer has New England to this message ? Will she 
 permit the prejudice of war to remain in the hearts of the con- 
 querors when it has died in the hearts of the conquered? Will 
 she transmit this prejudice to the next generation, that in their 
 hearts, which never felt the generous ardor of conflict, it may 
 perpetuate itself ? Will she withhold, save in strained courtesy, 
 the hand which straight from his soldier's heart. Grant offered 
 Lee at Appomattox ? Will she make the vision of a restored and 
 happy people, which gathered about the couch of your dying 
 captain, filling his heart with grace, touching his lips with praise 
 and glorifying his path to the grave ; will she make this vision, 
 on which the last sigh of his expiring soul breathed a benedic- 
 tion, a cheat and a delusion "? If she does, the South, never abject 
 in asking for comradeship, must accept with dignity its refusal ; 
 but if she does not — if she accepts with frankness and sincerity 
 this message of good will and friendship — then will the prophecy 
 of Webster, delivered in this very Society forty years ago, amid 
 tremendous applause, be verified in its final and fullest sense, 
 when he said: "Standing hand in hand, and clasping hands, we 
 shall remain united as we have l)een for sixtv vears, citizens of 
 
96 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the same country, members of the same government, united all, 
 united now, and united forever." There have been difficulties, 
 contentions and controversies, but I tell you that in my judgment, 
 
 "Those opposed eyes, 
 AVhich, like the meteors of a troubled heaven, 
 All of one nature, of one substance bred. 
 Did lately meet in th' intestine shock. 
 Shall now, in mutual, Avell-beseemiiig ranks 
 March all one Avav." 
 
 J • 
 
 V (c) The Peroration as an Appeal 
 
 When some action is sought, its necessity is driven 
 home in the appeal of the peroration. Of course, many- 
 actions might spring from feelings developed in the 
 concluding remarks just quoted from Schurz, Webster, 
 and Grady. But their application was very general. On 
 the other hand, a very definite act is sometimes sought 
 and deliberately urged in the peroration. Note this con- 
 clusion of Senator Root's speech looking toward the 
 repeal of the Canal Toll Bill. 
 
 Mr. President, there is but one alternative consistent with 
 self-respect. We must arbitrate the interpretation of this treaty 
 or we must retire from the position we have taken. 
 
 0, Senators^' consider for a moment what it is that we 
 are doing. We all love our country; we are all full of hope 
 and courage for its future; we love its good name; we desire 
 for it that power among the nations of the earth which will 
 enable it to accomplish still greater things for civilization than 
 it has accomplished in the noble past. Shall we make ourselves 
 in the minds of the world like unto the man who is known to 
 })e false to his agrt^ements, false to his pledged word ? Shall 
 we have it understood the whole world over that "you must 
 look out for the United States or she will get the advantage of 
 you"; that we are clever and cunning to get the better of the 
 other party to an agreement, and th;it at the end — 
 
THE CONCLUSION 97 
 
 Mr. Brandegee: ''Slippery" would be a bettor word. 
 
 Mr. Root: Yes; I thank the Senator for tiie suggestion — 
 "Slippery." Shall we in our generation add to those claims 
 to honor and respect which our fathers- have established for our 
 country, good cause that we shall be considered slippery ? 
 
 It is worth while, Mr. President, to be a citizen of a great 
 country, but size alone is not enough to make a country great, 
 A country must be great in its ideals ; it must be great-hearted ; 
 it must be noble; it must despise and reject all smallness and 
 meanness; it must be faithful to its word; it must keep the 
 faith of treaties ; it must be faithful to its mission of civilization 
 in order that it shall be truly great. It is because we believe 
 this of our country, that we are proud, aye, that the alien, with 
 the first step of his foot on our soil, is proud to be a part of 
 the great democracy. 
 
 Let us put aside the idea of small, petty advantage ; let us 
 treat this situation and these obligations in our relation to the 
 canal in that large way which befits a great nation. 
 
 Mr. President, how sad it would be if we were to dim the 
 splendor of the great achievement of constructing the canal, by 
 drawing across it the mark of petty selfishness ; if we were to 
 diminish and reduce for generations to come, the power and 
 influence of this free Republic for the uplifting and advance 
 and the progress of mankind, by destroying the respect of man- 
 kind for us ! How sad it would be if you and I, Senators, were 
 to make ourselves responsi])le for destroying that bright and 
 inspiring ideal which has enabled free Amer^»a to hnid the 
 world in progress toward liberty and justice ! 
 
 Here the appeal to action is on the ground that such 
 action will be in keeping with lofty ideals. Note the fol- 
 lowing appeal in Cnrran's speech in defence of Patrick 
 Finney, charged with liigli treason. It was made after 
 lie had analyzed the testimony in a thorough manner. 
 
 The character of the prisoner has been given. Am I war- 
 ranted in saying that I ani now defending an innocent and un- 
 fortunate fellow-subject, on the grounds of eternal justice and 
 immutable law ? On that eternal law, I do now call upon you to 
 
98 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 acquit my client. I call upon you for 3'our justice ! Great 
 is the reward, and sweet is the recollection in tlie hour of trial, 
 and in the day of dissolution, when the casualties of life are 
 pressing close upon your heart, and when, in the agonies of 
 death, you look back to the justifiable and honorable transac- 
 tions of your life. At the awful foot of the Eternal Justice,^ 
 I do, therefore, invite you to acquit my client ; and nuiy God, 
 of his infinite mercy, grant you that great compensation which 
 is a reward more lasting than the perishable crown we read 
 of, which the ancients gave to him who saved the life of a 
 fellow-citizen in battle. 
 
 In the name of public justice, I do implore you to interpose 
 between the perjurer and his intended victim ; and, if ever you 
 are assailed by the villainy of an informer, may you find refuge 
 in the recollection of that example, which, when jurors, you 
 set to those that might be called on to pass judgment upon your 
 lives; to repel at the human tribunal the intended effects of 
 hireling perjury and premeditated murder! If it should be 
 the fate of any of you to count the tedious moments of captivity, 
 in sorrow and in pain, pining in the damps and gloom of a 
 dungeon, recollect there is another more awful tribunal than 
 any on earth, which we must all approach, and before which the 
 best of us will have occasion to look back to what little good 
 he has done on this side the grave ; I do pray, that Eternal 
 Justice may record the deed you bave done, and give to you 
 the full benefit of your claims to an eternal reward, a requital 
 in mercy upon your souls! 
 
 Of course, an appeal is usually charged with emotion. 
 While it is best for the speaker to suppress feeling and 
 maintain an intellectual calm during his statement and 
 proof, he is justified in showing his feelings after a good 
 ground for them has been established. There is not 
 only the natural feeling of the speaker himself, but there 
 is a conscious attempt on liis part to (^xcite the ejiiotinus 
 of tlu^ audience, for action springs fi-om IVcliug. Notice 
 tluit Currau's ])eroratiou shows his own strong feelings, 
 
THE CONCLITSION 99 
 
 works on the sympathies of the jury, and even arouses 
 fear of retribution if there be an unjust verdict. 
 
 A typical appeal is the one used by Henry Clay in 
 support of the New Army Bill, January 8, 1813, in the 
 House of Representatives. The war, declared in June, 
 1812, had been a failure and the administration had al- 
 most been defeated in the election by a ''peace candi- 
 date. ' ' In his speech. Clay tried, in general, to stir the 
 nation to renewed activity and, in particular, to pass the 
 proposed bill calling- for the organization of twenty new 
 regiments. 
 
 * * * ^jj honorable peace is attainable only by an effi- 
 cient war. ]\Iy plan would be to call out the ample resources of 
 the couutiy; give them a judicious direction; prosecute the 
 war with the utmost vigor ; strike wherever we can reach the 
 enemy, at sea or on land, and dictate the terms of peace at 
 Quebec or Halifax. We are told that England is a proud and 
 lofty nation, which, disdaining to wait for danger, meets it 
 ialf way. Haughty as she is, we once triumphed over her, 
 and, if we do not listen to the counsels of timidity and despair, 
 we shall again prevail. In such a cause, with the aid of 
 Providence, we must come out crowned with success; but if 
 we fail, let us fail like men, lash ourselves to our gallant tars, 
 and expire together in one common struggle, fighting for free 
 
 TRADE AND SEAMEN 's RIGHTS. 
 
 Naturally, there are as many different perorations as 
 there are different audiences, purposes, and occasions 
 for address. But these three general aims — to sum- 
 marize, tcuapply, and tp appeal — are very typical and 
 indicate the nature of the functions of the conclusion. 
 
 Preparation of the Conclusion 
 
 We cannot leave this topic without giving a practical 
 hint about the preparation of the concluding matter. 
 
100 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Have it well prepared. Know just how you expect to 
 strike. Do not rise to begin a speech without knowing 
 precisely how you will end it. Too many speakers 
 ramble on and on, never knowing when or how to stop 
 and never driving home whatever of good they may have 
 said during the speech proper. 
 
 A necessary preliminary step is to determine clearly 
 just what great divisions of thought you will cover in 
 the body of the speech. Until you become very expert 
 and fully capable of changing plans in the midst of a 
 talk, it is well to have your points fully planned. Your 
 
 task is to treat Point A , Point B , and 
 
 Point C ; these and no more. Do not attempt to 
 
 deviate from or add to these points, but, having finished 
 the task assigned, conclude briefly and sit down. It is 
 evident that even if the conclusion is well thought out 
 and the speech proper poorly planned, the uncertainty 
 and rambling will take place. 
 
 If, perchance, you do find yourself wandering and at 
 a loss for further ideas, the safe thing to do is to pause, 
 and then summarise . Even though you may not be able 
 to make an application or appeal, the summary gives the 
 sense of completion and is therefore an acceptable con^ 
 elusion. Furthermore, it may have the effect of enabling 
 you to collect yourself to make a peroration of the other 
 types. Never sit down when in the midst of wandering 
 or fragmentary remarks. Never say, with uncertainty, 
 "Well, I guess that is about all I have to say," and sit 
 down. Rather make a crisp, business-like summary. 
 That at least gives the impi-ession of completeness and 
 mastery. 
 
 A student, whether or not he becomes a master of the 
 poetic, tln-illiug ])er()ratioii and tlie appeal, must by all 
 
I 
 
 THE CONCLUSION 101 
 
 means cultivate facility in terse and accurate summary. 
 No other single asset is so valuable to the speaker, es- 
 pecially to the speaker who has to reply to opponents or 
 has to address popular gatherings. In debate, the sum- 
 mary of what the antagonist has said is the logical 
 foundation of an attack upon his position. No one can 
 reply well unless he can analyze and summarize well. 
 So, also, in making your ow^n independent speeches, sum- 
 maries are necessary, not only at the end, but also to 
 recapitulate throughout the body of the address. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 'i1i(' written exercises in this entire lesson sliould he 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the writtcMi exer- 
 cises in voiir notebook. 
 
 First Ddj). — You have read through the lesson. Study it care- 
 fully and test your mastery of its contents by answering the 
 appended questions (page 103). Eead aloud many times 
 and with the best effect possible all the conclusions quoted. 
 Throw yourself into the situation and read the matter with 
 enthusiasm. 
 Second Day. — Clip out an editorial from a current newspaper 
 or magazine. Analyze it, and tlien write the topics it treats, 
 thus : 
 
 A (giving the sense in a single sentence) . 
 
 B. . . (using a similar topic .sentence). 
 
 C 
 
 Then develop it orally, adding an original summary of 
 
 the ivliole. If you can make many analyses and summaries, 
 
 the work will be of great benefit to you. 
 
 Third Day. — Write perorations which take the ])roader and 
 
 loftier viewpoint, assuming that the speech preceding it has 
 
 proved. 
 
 1. Free public education has reduced crime. 
 
102 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 2. Free public education has improved the economic effi- 
 
 ciency of the masses. 
 
 3. Free public education has elevated the intellectual 
 
 capacity of the nation. 
 
 4. Free public education has cultivated higher forms of 
 
 appreciation and amusement. 
 Make a similar topical outline or brief of any other sub- 
 ject, and write out in full the kind of peroration designed. 
 You should always develop your ideas orally several times 
 before writing them out. Oral composition should always 
 precede the written composition, especially when a man is 
 training to become a speaker. 
 Fourth Day. — Make a topical outline for the following speeches 
 and write out an appeal in full. Follow directions given 
 above for the third day. 
 
 1. To a church society, a speech requesting funds to establish 
 
 free-milk stations for babies in the slums. 
 
 2. To the mine owners of Colorado, a speech asking them 
 
 to arbitrate their differences with the miners. 
 
 3. To a large manufacturing board of directors, a recom- 
 
 mendation to make a whirlwind, advertising campaign. 
 ■1. To the superintendents of education, a speech advocating 
 
 more vocational or trade schools. 
 5. A speech in the behalf of any cause in which you are 
 
 interested. 
 
 Work out other exercises on several similar topics. 
 Fifth Day. — Take a long newspaper article reporting a law 
 case, civil or criminal, and make a topical analysis. Then 
 write out (a) a formal summary, (b) a crisp summary to 
 re-enforce it, (c) an appeal for acquittal or conviction. 
 
 It might be well for the student to memorize one or two of 
 the peroratioiis given in this lesson. This is not intended to 
 get liim in the habit of speaking from memory, but to give him 
 permanent possession of one or two models and to give him 
 the spirit of tlie peroration. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These qm-stions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knoAvU'djre of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are si)(/f/e.stivc merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. Corax made his type plan to meet the needs of citizens 
 who had to plead land-claim suits ; that is, in Sicily, when there 
 was a dispute over the title of a piece of property, each citizen 
 argued his own cause. Why do you think the arrangement 
 Corax made was a good one for the purpose ? 
 
 2. Why is it better to divide the speech into three parts — 
 introduction, body, and conclusion — than to enumerate five or 
 eight separate parts? 
 
 3. Did you ever hear a speaker who made a fairly good 
 speech but did not succeed in driving it home? What man 
 do you know who does drive home his ideas most thoroughly? 
 
 4. Why should the conclusion be in the mind from the start? 
 Why prepare the introduction last ? 
 
 5. Did you ever hear a long speech and find it impossible to 
 remember the message of the speaker ? Would a summary have 
 helped any? Why? 
 
 6. Why do you think a formal summary is more necessary 
 in a legal plea than in a eulogy? When is the service of a 
 formal summary indispensable ? When may it be omitted ? 
 
 7. What advantage has the crisp summary over the formal 
 summary? What disadvantage? 
 
 8. Were you ever repelled by a speaker who was highly 
 emotional at the very beginning? Were you ever "carried 
 away " by an emotional burst at the end ? Why do you tolerate 
 at the end what might be offensive at the beginning? 
 
 0. Why is it better to tell what you want the audience to do 
 in an appeal at the end than to tell it in a statement in the 
 beginning? 
 
 103 
 
104 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 10. What is a good note of appeal to strike with most juries? 
 Why do lawyers defending murder cases often demand a 
 death sentence or acquittal, but not a compromise sentence 
 for a period of years? 
 
 11. What is a good note of appeal to be used with gatherings 
 of business men? 
 
 12. Do you think the poetical quotation at the end of Grady's 
 "New South" strengthens or weakens the effect? 
 
 13. Were you ever stirred by a speaker but were h?ft with 
 the feeling that while you would like to do something, you did 
 not know just what to do? Why should most appeals be very 
 definite ? 
 
 14. What is the effect on the speaker himself of uncertainty 
 concerning the ending of a speech ? What effect does rambling 
 have on an audience ? 
 
 15. Why is the summary an efficient means of stopping ram- 
 bling ? 
 
LESSON 7 
 physical aspects of delivery 
 
 1. Introduction 
 
 Thus far we have spoken about the mental side of 
 speech-making: The clear thinking out of ideas, their 
 arrangement in the most effective order, their proper 
 introduction, their application and appeal — all these are 
 matters of mental exercise. But now we must turn for 
 a while to the physical side of the delivery of a speech. 
 A cornetist might have the most wonderful melodies in 
 his mind, but if he had no instrument and if his breath 
 were insufficient to make it produce sound, other people 
 would never get the benefit of his musical genius. The 
 body with its lungs, vocal cords, and tongiie is the in- 
 strument of the public speaker. Without a good control 
 of the body, there can be no adequate expression of 
 ideas by means of voice and gesture. Therefore, we 
 shall consider the most important of those physical 
 things which influence the effectiveness of a speaker. 
 
 We do not intend to give minute directions about the 
 way the finger should be pointed or the eyebrow raised. 
 We are not concerned with the conscious control of de- 
 tails of gesture or grimace. But we do face this situa- 
 tion: Some men get out of breath when they speak; 
 some become hoarse if they talk continuously for five or 
 105 
 
106 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ten minutes; some sjjeak so poorly that they cannot be 
 heard even in a small hall; some have their voices 
 "break." All these are practical obstacles to efficiency. 
 We must show the student how to overcome or avoid 
 them. 
 
 But besides these very obvious weaknesses of most 
 untrained speakers, there are the less generally recog- 
 nized deficiencies of unpleasant tone, jerky delivery due 
 to poor breathing, and individual mannerisms. With 
 these, also, we must deal. 
 
 Fortunately, if the student will acquire a few simple 
 habits of posture and breathing, most of tlio matters of 
 voice range, quality, and ease will take care of them- 
 selves. These habits are to speaking what normal liv- 
 ing is to health. If one lives properly, he need never 
 attend to his health, for it will take care of itself, and 
 he need never consult a physician. So, also, the speaker 
 who habitually stands well and breathes properly will 
 unconsciously produce pleasant, strong tones and make 
 graceful gestures. Furthermore, easy posture and cor- 
 rect, deep breathing have a wonderful influence upon the 
 mental calm and effectiveness of the speaker. We shall, 
 then, devote this lesson to fundamental, physical consid- 
 erations which have a far-reaching effect upon the mind 
 and voice of the speaker. 
 
 2. Posture 
 
 By posture, we mean the way the speaker stands — 
 how he rests upon his feet, how he holds his trunk, or 
 torso, and the attitude of his head and arms. There is a 
 good posture which makes for efficiencv and there are 
 
PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 107 
 
 bad ones which interfore with delivery. The ideal pos- 
 ture shouhl do two things: (1) It shoukl be the most 
 comfortable position of rest from which the speaker may 
 make the most direct, easy, and graceful movements 
 when there is a natural impulse for him to do so; and 
 (2) it should be the best position to foster the kind of 
 breathing- which is most desirable for the public speaker. 
 
 (a) The Position of the Feet 
 
 The first and easiest thing to explain about posture 
 is the disposition of the feet. They should be placed 
 so as to support the body in easy balance, permitting the 
 simplest change of position when the speaker moves 
 about on the platform or shifts his weight in gesture. 
 There are, of course, many different attitudes which a 
 speaker may assume during an address. We shall de- 
 scribe now the normal posture, or standard position, 
 from which the speaker departs in assuming the others 
 and with wdiich others are compared. 
 
 Look at the outline picture of Demosthenes and note 
 the position of the feet. Y^ou will see that the right foot 
 is somewhat in advance of the left, thus bringing the 
 right hand, with which most men usually make the most 
 gestures, nearest the audience. (The Greek orator has 
 that arm free of drapery so that its movements will be 
 unhampered.) Neither foot points directly at the au- 
 dience, though the right foot comes nearer to doing so 
 than the left. If a line were drawn through the right 
 foot and back to the left foot, it would pass through the 
 left heel. The right foot is advanced so that the heel is 
 about as far forward as the toe of the left. The accom- 
 
Figiiro 1 
 
 DEMOSTHENES 
 
 Statup in tho Vatican Museum 
 
PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 
 
 109 
 
 panying diagram (Figure 2) shows the relative posi- 
 tions of the two feet and indicates that they are turned 
 at about an angle of 45 degrees. 
 
 (b) The Weight of the Body 
 
 It is from this normal position, as a point of de- 
 parture, that the speaker changes during the progress 
 of his speech. The feet having been so placed, the next 
 problem is the determination of the disposition of the 
 weight of the body. Look at the picture of Demos- 
 thenes. It shows a man in the normal position at rest. 
 You can imagine him just facing the Athenian audience 
 waiting quietly until their applause of greeting sub- 
 sides. His weight is almost entirely on the left foot and 
 the right knee is somewhat bent. But when he straight- 
 ens up to speak, the bend at the right knee will disap- 
 pear ; the shoulders will be thrown back and the weight, 
 though still more on the left foot than on the right, will 
 be almost equally borne by both. This is the nornud 
 position in action. 
 
 With the feet in the normal position, the weight may 
 be shifted so as to be almost wholly on the left foot, now 
 equally on both, and again all on the right. While wait- 
 ing, or in a retiring attitude, there is a normal tendency 
 ^ rest easily on the back, or left, foot. In straightfor- 
 
110 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ward, natural discourse, the weight is borne equally by 
 both feet. With increased energy, the weight shifts 
 more forward, and in very aggressive speech the weight 
 is almost entirely on the forw^ard foot. In great anima- 
 tion the speaker may even lean forward with the heel of 
 the left foot well oif the floor. Yet the normal position 
 for normal delivery calls for both feet placed firmly on 
 the floor ; their positions in relation to eacli other should 
 be as indicated in the diagram and the w^eight should be 
 carried almost equally. The legs are straight and the 
 body held upright. 
 
 (c) Practice 
 
 Assume the normal position at rest and as you say 
 these words, straighten up in action as described in the 
 paragraph above : ' ' Mr. President, I am pleased to ad- 
 dress the House on the question of the freedom of the 
 F'ilipinos." At this point, the weight is carried equally 
 l)y both feet. As you continue, shift a little more weight 
 to the right foot, saying, ''Where human liberty is to 
 be gained, there will I always take my stand." 
 
 Note that at rest, the body bends in somewhat at the 
 waist and the left hip sinks. In action, the body is erect. 
 In earnest address, it is more vigorously erect. Con- 
 tinue your exercise by improvising a number of quiet 
 openings which gradually change to more spirited ex- 
 pression. In each case, start from (1) the somewhat 
 subdued position of rest to (2) the easy balance of nor- 
 mal action, and {?>) the more tense posture of animated 
 delivery. 
 
 The student should continue his exercises witli the 
 view to securing easy balance in all positions and du- 
 ring the shifting of weiglit. Tlirongliout tlie actual de- 
 
PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 111 
 
 livery of a real speech, one does not attend to these 
 things; he either does them well or poorly, but he does 
 not consciously direct his body. The exercises we sug- 
 gest are to train the body so that it will take care of 
 itself when the mind is engaged in the business of send- 
 ing thoughts to the audience. Indeed, all mechanical 
 exercises in connection with speech are to be forgotten 
 during the delivery of the speech itself. It is hoped, 
 however, that their effects will be evident in excellent 
 performance. 
 
 (d) The Posture of the Trunk 
 
 We shall now consider the way the body from the 
 waist up should be held. Again we take a normal, or 
 standard, posture as the point of departure. We want a 
 posture which will be manly and pleasing and which will 
 facilitate good breathing. It is a well-known fact that 
 clerks who sit hunched over a desk do not fill their lungs 
 properly with air. Their posture prevents them from 
 doing so. In order to get a full breath, the shoulders 
 must be thrown back and the chest held high. Then, at 
 the same time, there must be freedom at the waist so that 
 a deep inlialation may be possible. 
 
 It will be clear, before we end this lesson, that if the 
 student can get the habit of standing with the shoulders 
 held properly, the back hollow, stomach in, and chest up, 
 he wHl be able to breathe in the proper, public-speaking 
 style. No doubt you have seen in drug stores the braces 
 which are advertised to '^make you breathe cor- 
 rectly." This indeed they do, for they draw the shoul- 
 ders back and force the body into the position just 
 described. The exercises we shall give will also force 
 you to breathe properly, because they will strengthen 
 
112 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEi^ING 
 
 the muscles which must work to enable you to hold the 
 correct posture. It is better to strengthen the muscles 
 than to wear a band or brace. 
 
 (e) Exercise 
 
 (a) Stand in a military position and bring the two 
 fists together on the chest at the level of the shoulders. 
 (Fig. 3.) The thumbs and fingers face the floor. The 
 backs of the hands, the elbows, and the shoulders are all 
 in a straight line. 
 
 Figure 3 
 
 (b) Keeping the elbows steadily in position and using 
 them for a center, describe a quarter-circle with the 
 fists. The two thumbs face each other during the move- 
 ment. Do it with strong tension and resistance all the 
 time, so that the muscles feel the strain. 
 
 (c) When the fists have reached the top of the curve, 
 slowly twist them so that the thumbs turn away from the 
 face and the backs of the two hands are opposite each 
 other. Then continue the movement of the fists, describ- 
 ing the rest of a full half-circle. The two arms 
 
PHYSICAL ASPECTS OP DELIVERY 
 
 113 
 
 are now fully extended at shoulder level with the thumbs 
 down toward the floor. The strain is continued through- 
 out. 
 
 (d) Now gradually bring the two fists forward, at 
 shoulder level, until they meet once more at the original 
 position on the chest (Fig. 4). All this time bear down 
 
 I 
 
 Figure 4 '•— • 
 
 strongly under the shoulder so that the greatest tension 
 is felt under the shoulder blades. 
 
 Maintain this position for a moment and notice that 
 the chest has been raised by the strong action of the 
 muscles of the back and shoulder. This is the West 
 Point ' ' high-chest. ' ' 
 
 (e) Now drop the hands lightly to the sides, but main- 
 tain the chest posture by an effort under the shoulders 
 and in the back. 
 
 It will be noticed that the back is arched inwardly, or 
 is hollow^, and the chest is high. This is ideal for a big 
 lung capacity. Consequently, it is excellent for both 
 health and public speaking. 
 
 Repeat this exercise in your I'oom; do it often just 
 before starting for a w^alk. Get the habit of holding 
 
1]4 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the chest up. While walking, remember to maintain the 
 West Point chest. Even while sitting at the desk, main- 
 tain it. When you bend forward, let it be from the hip, 
 not from the ivaist. The line from the base of the back- 
 bone to the neck should be kept a hollow curve ; never let 
 the shoulders droop forward, the back bow out, and the 
 chest cave in. If these directions are followed, you will 
 cultivate the ideal posture of the upper body. 
 
 (f) Flexibility 
 
 While it is true that the chest must be held up, still 
 the student must not allow this to influence him to be- 
 come generally stiff and restrained in his movements. 
 Do not draw the chin in stiffly or keep the arms in a 
 muscular cramp. After taking the exercise just de- 
 scribed and while still holding the chest well up, allow 
 the head to roll limply from side to side. Then allow it 
 to circle around, with the jaw relaxed and the chin 
 dropped. Do this until you get the ability to hold the 
 chest well and at the same time move the head and jaw 
 with the utmost freedom. There must be no stiffness 
 in the speaker's jaw or throat. 
 
 Now do the same with the hands and arms. Keeping 
 the chest up, loosely swing the arms back and forth. 
 Then fling the hand out as in a greeting, saying, ''I 
 welcome you to our country place." Then wave the 
 hand to the side as though saying, "All these lands are 
 open to you." In short, see to it that while the chest 
 is kept high by the muscles under the shoulders and in 
 the ])ack, the rest of the body is flexible and unrestrained. 
 After a while, the pi'oper muscles wliich control the 
 
PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 115 
 
 chest posture will do their work without direction from 
 the mind. That is the goal toward which constant ex- 
 ercise and practice will lead. 
 
 3. Breathing 
 
 It would not have been safe to give the student breath- 
 ing exercises before he had mastered the correct posture 
 of the chest, for breathing under incorrect posture con- 
 ditions only fixes bad habits. It is unfortunate to give, 
 as many works on elocution do, numerous exercises on 
 the intake and outlet of air without first teaching pos- 
 ture. This we avoid ; we urge the student to get posture 
 as a necessary preliminary to correct breath control. 
 
 Breathing to sustain life differs somewhat from 
 breathing to supply the motor power for speaking. In 
 the former case we are mostly interested in a deep 
 inhalation to fill the lungs with oxygen and a quick 
 expiration to get rid of the devitalized air. But, in 
 speaking, we wish to regulate the expiration so as to 
 use the air slowly as it passes out, in much the same way 
 as steam is used to make an engine w^ork. Consequently, 
 we shall study with care, not only the best way to get 
 the greatest amount of air into the lungs, but also the 
 way to regulate its emission so that it will most effi- 
 ciently work to produce the sounds in speech. 
 
 (a) Inhalation 
 
 The lungs rest in the chest and are surrounded by the 
 ribs in all directions save the bottom. Here they rest 
 upon an extensive surface of muscle and tendon called 
 the diaphragm. This flexible wall of muscle is like a 
 
116 
 
 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 bowl turned upside down; and it separates the chest from 
 the abdomen (Fig. 5). The size of the chest can be in- 
 
 , ^ 
 
 Figure 5 
 
 I — First rib. 
 
 II — Second rib, etc. 
 
 A — ^Voice box or larynx. 
 
 B — Wind pipe or tracliea. 
 
 C — Collar-bone. 
 I) — Lungs. 
 R — Breast-bone. 
 V — Diaphragm. 
 
 creased in two ways: (1) By raising the ribs so as to in- 
 crease the upper girth, and (2) by flattening the dia- 
 pliragm so as to increase the depth (Fig. 6). 
 
 The exercises for posture suggested in the first part 
 of this lesson are designed to raise the ribs and keep 
 them raised. Tliis gives a steady magnitude in the girth 
 
PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 
 
 117 
 
 of the upper chest. Figure 6 indicates how the raising 
 of the ribs accomplishes the desired object. It is im- 
 portant to note the following points : 
 
 1. The bony framework of the chest should be stead- 
 ily held up by the muscles behind the shoulders. It 
 should not be raised by the inflation of the lungs. It 
 should hardly move at all during speaking. 
 
 2. The great movement during speaking should be 
 
 (a) 
 
 (b) 
 
 Figure 6 
 
 (a) Ribs and Spinal Column, sliowing 1st and Ttli ribs in position of relaxa- 
 tion and in "high chest" position when drawn up by muscles of the bacli and 
 shoulder. 
 
 (b) Scheme showing the chest walls and diaphragm with air expelled and 
 (dash outline) with a full breath; diaphragmatic, high chest combination. 
 
 just below the point at which the ribs meet the breast- 
 bone and on a level with the little, floating ribs. 
 The 7novement is caused hy the rise and fall of the 
 diaphragm. 
 
 This second observation brings us to a discussion of 
 the diaphragm. To appreciate its action for the first 
 
118 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 time, it is best to lie fiat upon your bacli wlien you are 
 undressed and ready to retire for tlie night. While thus 
 reclining, the ribs, not being weighted down by the arms 
 and their own bulk, easily assume the correct position 
 of maximum girth. While lying on your back, place the 
 hand just below the breast-bone and take a good, deep 
 breath. Notice how that part of the body rises and falls 
 with the breathing. The reason for this is that the 
 diaphragm flattens so that its edges push out the lower 
 ribs on the sides and the upper abdomen in the front. 
 Feel the lower ribs on both sides wliile taking the 
 breath. 
 
 The great fault with most men is that they take too 
 shallow a breath and do not work the diaphragm enough. 
 Furthermore, they raise the shoulders and upper chest 
 when taking a breath and let the chest fall flat when they 
 exhale. 
 
 Now stand upright with the hand on the center of the 
 upper abdomen; concentrate the attention on that part 
 of the body; hold the chest high and take a deep breath. 
 Do this many times until you are able (1) to maintain a 
 motionless high chest, and (2) to breathe by the action 
 of the diaphragm. During actual speaking, one does not 
 attend to his movements. Furthermore, there will be 
 some slight activity of the upper chest. But try to keep 
 a steady upper chest during exercises consciously done. 
 
 (b) Exhalation 
 
 You will have noticed that the intake of breath with 
 central breathing as described above gives the sensation 
 of increased effort in the region of the diaphragm. The 
 deeper the breath, the stronger the sensation of tighten- 
 
PHYSICxVL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 119 
 
 ing. During exhalation, there should be a gradual re- 
 laxation of that effort. To appreciate what is wanted, 
 take a slow, deep breath, feeling the effect grow stronger 
 and stronger. Then retain the air in the lungs by main- 
 taining the effort at the diaphragm. {Do not hold in 
 the air by constricting the throat. If there is any sensa- 
 tion in the throat, your method is wrong.) Now sound 
 S-5-5-.S-5 continuously and slowly by having the air pour 
 out smoothly. It is released from the lungs by a slow 
 and steady release of the muscular tension of the dia- 
 phragm. There must he central control of emission and 
 not throat control. It will be noticed at first that the air 
 and the sound of s will come out in spurts. This is be- 
 cause your control is not good. But constant practice 
 will give you such control that you can let the air out 
 at a sloiv and steady rate. It will also probably be 
 noticed that after a certain amount of the air is out 
 there is a tendency for all the rest to burst forth with a 
 rush. That is because the control becomes more difficult 
 as the diaphragm relaxes. 
 
 , (c) Breathing Exercises to Increase Capacity 
 
 1. Stand in the normal posture, but with the palms of 
 the two hands resting lightly on the upper chest. Breathe 
 through the nostrils. Slowly inliale with the dia- 
 phragmatic effort and gently pat the chest with the 
 hands. This tends to force the air into partially unex- 
 panded air cells. 
 
 2. Repeat exercise 1 and have someone else gently 
 tap you all over the back. Do not hit hard, but rapidly 
 and gently. • 
 
120 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 3. Stand in tlie military position with the chest well 
 up and the hands at the sides. Then as you slowly in- 
 hale, raise the arms, fluttering the hands until the two 
 backs meet over the head. As you slowly exhale, let the 
 hands return to the original position at the side. 
 
 These three exercises are excellent for one who has 
 been standing in a poor posture and breathing incor- 
 rectly with the result that a great manj^ of the little air 
 cells of the lungs have remained undeveloped. The fol- 
 lowing exercises should be used after those given above 
 have been used for a few weeks. 
 
 4. Standing with the hands on the waist so that the 
 fingers lie along the abdomen and the thumbs are in the 
 hollow of the back, take a comfortable, full breath, ac- 
 cording to the method just described. Then, by an effort 
 of the diaphragm, draw in a little more and a little more 
 air until the absolute limit is reached. Expel quickly 
 through the nose. With this effort there must be no 
 "sipping" or "packing" in the throat. There must 
 indeed be no effort whatsoever at the throat; all the 
 strain should be on the diaphragm as it is forced flatter 
 and flatter and held so. 
 
 (d) Breathing Exercises for Control of Emission 
 
 5. Take a full, though comfortable, breath as de- 
 scribed. Then slowly and steadily count aloud, one, two, 
 three, four, etc., so that all the sounds are firm and of 
 equal force and clearness. They come at regular inter- 
 vals. As you proceed, there is a gradual relaxation of 
 the diaphragm, the steadiness and evenness of which 
 determine the character of the sounds. Do not attempt 
 
I 
 
 PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 121 
 
 long-distance records at first. Stop as soon as the 
 sounds lack firmness and precision. 
 
 6. Kead aloud anything you may select; try to 
 take as few breaths as possible, while maintaining a 
 strong and pleasing tone. Regulate as noted in Exer- 
 cise 5. 
 
 (e) Comhinafion Breathing Exercise 
 
 7. Assume the standard posture of the trunk; 
 breathe through the nostrils; (a) inhale slowly with 
 diaphragmatic effort as you silently count off three sec- 
 onds; (b) hold the breath by central (and not throat) 
 effort for three seconds; (c) exhale slowly for three sec- 
 onds; (d) rest for three seconds. Repeat this twelve- 
 second cycle for about ten minutes. If difficulty is ex- 
 perienced in keeping the three-second rest, leave it out 
 at first. Then introduce a rest of one second, then two, 
 then the full three seconds. The idea is to have regular, 
 i-hythmic breathing. While taking this exercise, move 
 the head about freely; also move the arms, for the whole 
 body should be perfectly flexible and at ease, and in no 
 wise hampered by the breathing. 
 
 An excellent application of this exercise may be made 
 during walking. Make each portion of the cycle four 
 ])eats instead of three, for each step is likely to be 
 quicker than a second interval. While walking, with 
 the steps as the measure, do the cycle. Keep the arms 
 swinging freely and let the head move as when looking 
 about to observe surroundings. If you swing the Indian 
 clubs or use dumb-bells, the breathing exercise can be 
 performed during the regular and rhythmic moves of 
 your gymnastics. But above all, use your walking time 
 
122 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 to improve yonr breathing; this is the best way to get 
 the iiecessaiy, constant practice. 
 
 (f) Conditions for Breathing Exercises 
 
 You may make as many combinations of the exercises 
 given above as you please; you may also add different 
 tricks of rapid or slow intake, explosive expulsion, sigh- 
 ing, sobbing, and yawning. But observe the following 
 conditions when taking the exercises: 
 
 1. Never exercise just before or just after a meal; 
 disturbances of the digestive process may result. 
 
 2. Have the windows open or be out of doors. You 
 ought to use only clean, fresh air. 
 
 3. Do not raise the shoulders, but maintain the 
 steady, high chest. 
 
 4. Have perfect freedom at the waist and at the 
 small ribs ; do not have clothes tight in this region. 
 
 5. All the breathing eiTort should be at the diaphragm 
 not at the throat. 
 
 4. CoNCLUDixG Remarks 
 
 Because these exercises are to be practiced carefully 
 and every movement is to be regulated by the mind, it 
 must not be thought that the speaker, while delivering 
 his address, stands and breathes by rule. On the con- 
 trary, all his physical acts should take care of themselves 
 while he centers his attention upon the audience and his 
 message. 
 
 The most effective state a speaker can be in is one of 
 earnestness, where he is driving straight onward toward 
 his object without giving thought to the physical means 
 
PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 123 
 
 he is using. But, nevertheless, those medianical parts 
 are the agencies tlirough which he readies the autlience, 
 and tliey nmst be cultivated so that during the act of 
 expression they will worthily represent the mind. 
 Nature has beneficently provided that good habits of 
 breathing and posture, once secured through training, 
 will take care of themselves while the mind is engaged 
 with ideas. Consequently, your effort in exercise will 
 not be lost even though, during speech, you forget Jioiv 
 you breathe or stand. 
 
 You should not despise good form and depend solely 
 upon ideas, for they cannot fully display themselves 
 if the form is poor. A novice will do well to see carefully 
 that his posture is good, at least at the beginning of a 
 speech. After he is once started, let the form take care 
 of itself. This it will do if the exercises have left their 
 traces in habitual movements. 
 
 In most cases, a good start will insure continued excel- 
 lence. On the other hand, a poor start is likely to estab- 
 lish an undesirable situation very difficult to overcome. 
 If you begin by slouching or with the hands in the 
 trousers pockets, you will find it difficult to change to a 
 less offensive attitude. Do not play with a spoon, a 
 _ glass, or a salt cellar on the table, or a book, or even a 
 watch charm or a button on the coat. Assume the 
 normal posture with the hands hanging easily and nat- 
 urally at the sides. As the speech proceeds, there will 
 be changes, but a good beginning helps toward making 
 the later movements simple, unembarrassed, direct, and 
 effective. 
 
 Often one is a little nervous just before beginning to 
 speak. It will usually be noticed that one of the symp- 
 toms of this nervousness is high, shallow breathing and 
 
124 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 consequent unpleasantness in the throat. The remedy is 
 a few slow, deep, steady breaths of the diaphragmatic 
 type. Indeed, a sj^eaker may always do well to take a 
 few steady, deep breaths, not only as a means of having 
 sufficient air to begin with, but also as a calmer. 
 
 Even during the address, the speaker may notice that 
 he is becoming nervous, that his breath is shallow^ and 
 his rate too fast. The corrective is to pause, breathe 
 low, and then proceed more deliberately, even attend- 
 ing consciously for a time to the deep, diaphragmatic 
 breathing. Certainly this course nuist be pursued if 
 the speaker feels his voice weakening or about to 
 *' crack." 
 
 This matter of breathing and posture is most impor- 
 tant. It is at the very foundation of physical efficiency. 
 Actors have ruined plays by bad breathing; ministers 
 have driven people from their churches by bad breath- 
 ing; political campaigns have been lost by the bad 
 breathing of candidates; and thousands of voices have 
 been ruined by the same pernicious evil. We urge most 
 emphatically, therefore, that the student make his body 
 fit to carry out the orders of his mind. Only through a 
 harmonious development of the mind and body can the 
 highest efficiency be attained. 
 
 Assignment of AVork 
 
 Tlip written 
 
 ■xcrciscs in 
 
 this 
 
 (Mitirt 
 
 lesson shoi 
 
 Id be 
 
 carefully worke 
 
 1 out. KtH' 
 
 ) nip 
 
 cs of 
 
 tlie written 
 
 exer- 
 
 ciscs in voiii' n( 
 
 tfhook. 
 
 
 
 
 
 First Da!j. — You have n-ad tlu> lesson. Now read it more 
 slowly, performing all the exei-cises once, according to direc- 
 tion. Tlien read it a tliird lime so as to get a coherent grasp 
 of the \vlio](> h'S.son. 
 
I 
 
 PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 125 
 
 Second Day. — Exercise with the position of the feet. Although 
 this day is especially devoted to the position of the feet, keep 
 the correct trunk posture. Take the speech on page 2(3, 
 Lesson 2. Assume the normal posture of the feet and read 
 with animation. Note tliat the weight tends to swing for- 
 ward on the words, "The supreme need of the hour is 
 * * * ." Read this whole speech, holding the book in 
 the left hand and gesticulating as freely as you please with 
 the right. Do this before the mirror. Notice the constant 
 shifting of the weight. Do the same thing with the Garfield 
 speech, on pages 33-37, Lesson 3. 
 
 Third Day. — Do the exercise for trunk posture (page 112). 
 Add the following: Stand in an open doorwaj^ with the 
 hands shoulder-high against the two sides, keep both feet 
 together; now fall forward, bending at the ankles, until the 
 shoulders are further forward than the hands ; then, by push- 
 ing with the hands, come back to the original position. Take 
 any other exercises designed to draw the shoulders back and 
 consequently to raise the chest. 
 
 Standing in the normal, or standard, position, and with the 
 back well arched, develop orally an outline or two, such as 
 those suggested on page 12, Lesson 1. Prepare and organize 
 your thoughts carefully before trying to amplify them orally. 
 Never undertake to speak unless you have your matter well 
 prepared. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Do all seven of the breathing exercises carefully. 
 Try speaking aloud, first with shallow breathing and then with 
 the approved kind. Note the difference in the sound of the 
 voice. Note also the difference in sensation. 
 
 Carefully regulating your breathing, recite a passage j-ou 
 have memorized — the Webster or the Clay peroration, page 93 
 and page 99, respectively, of Lesson 6. Read all the conclud- 
 ing passages of Lesson 6, holding the book in the left hand 
 and gesticulating freely as you will with the right. Carefully 
 regulate the breathing. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Plan an entire speech with introduction, body, and 
 conclusion. The following topics are offered as suggestions: 
 (1) The rise of Japan. 
 
126 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (2) Private Ownership of Laud. 
 
 (3) The Practieal Results of Social Legislatiou. 
 
 (4) Base Ball, the National Sport. 
 
 (5) The Right to Inherit Wealth. 
 
 Do not make more than three main points in the body of 
 the speech. While delivering the speech orally, observe your 
 breathing. This is for practice and instruction. When ad- 
 dressing a real audience, pay no attention to your breathing 
 unless you get into trouble, then use correct breathing as a 
 remedy. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledj^e of tlie piiiiciples in this lesson. They 
 are siigfiestife merely, dealing largely' with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future leference. 
 
 1. AVhy should a speaker exercise so as to iini:)rove his posture 
 and breathing! 
 
 2. If a man has good ideas and is in earnest, does it nuike any 
 difference in his effectiveness as a speaker if he stands awk- 
 wardly and breathes poorly? 
 
 3. Have you ever observed a speaker whose voice was weak 
 and unpleasant to listen to ? How did it affect yon in listening to 
 his ideas? 
 
 4. The next time you hear such a speaker, watch him closely 
 and see if there is anything the matter with his trunk posture or 
 liis breathing. Do his shoulders rise and fall during his speak- 
 ing? Is he hunched over? 
 
 5. Did you ever observe the curve or line of the back of an 
 opera singer? Do singers who make full, carrying tones slouch, 
 or do the}^ stand erect with chest high? Have you noted the 
 place of greatest movement when they breathe? Observe the 
 men rather than the women, for the dress of the latter interferes 
 with their movements during breathing. How does a speaker 
 compare with a singer in the matter of producing sounds ? 
 
 6. When you take your breathing exercise, do you become 
 dizzy ? If you do, rest a moment or even slap the cheeks lightly 
 and the dizziness will cease. As you progress, this symptom 
 will disappear. 
 
 7. Does the deep breathing make you a bit tired? It will if 
 you have been breathing incorrectly hitherto. Practice will 
 strengthen the muscles inVolv(Ml and they will work without 
 weariness. 
 
 127 
 
128 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 8. What are the two ways of increasing capacity mentioned in 
 the lessons"/ 
 
 9. Why would it be bad to take breathing lessons to increase 
 capacity and control if the posture were poor? 
 
 10. Someone said of a great speaker, "He owes his success 
 to liis diaphragm." What does that mean? Could it be true? 
 Why? 
 
 11. Do you stand correctly? Practice the exercise given for 
 tlie second day and the exercise given on page 110, over and over 
 again. Do they help ? 
 
 12. Which breathing exercises do you find most helpful? 
 
 13. What is the normal position ? 
 
 14. Who was Demosthenes? AYhat are some of his famous 
 orations ? 
 
 15. What is the value of a "good start"? How can you over- 
 come nervousness? 
 
LESSON 8 
 
 SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 
 
 While the mechanical requirements of correct posture 
 and breathing must be met, there are also certain sub- 
 jective attributes which are essential to effective de- 
 livery. To insure success with audiences, attractive 
 personal qualities must exist in the speaker. These 
 qualities re-enforce the message itself, they add to its 
 weight, or they make its acceptance more agroealjle. 
 Because, of deficiency in these subjective attributes, 
 many a keen thinker is listened to stolidly, if not defi- 
 antl}^, and his fairest conclusions only grudgingly 
 granted. Yet, on the other hand, there are speakers 
 with whom audiences are glad to agree so long as their 
 ideas have the barest plausibility. Evidently something 
 in the speaker either helps or hinders the most favor- 
 able acceptance of his w^ords by the audience. It is the 
 purpose of this lesson to outline the inner or subjective 
 trnits which make for efficiency and suggest methods of 
 cultivating them in the speaker. 
 
 1. Personality 
 
 \ 
 
 The broadest term we can use to designate the sub- 
 jective elements of charm, power, and attractiveness of 
 a speaker is personality. It sums up those genernl, ])er- 
 manent attributes which show through all his transitory 
 words and deeds. If that underlying, permanent self 
 
 129 
 
130 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 appeals to us, we say that the man has a good person- 
 ality. Naturally all do not have the same taste in this 
 matter and a man may seem pleasant to one person and 
 be colorless or even repulsive to another. Indeed, as 
 widely as individuals differ, just so wide is the diver- 
 gence in response to personality. Yet there are certain 
 attributes which are quite universally looked upon as 
 positive elements in a good personality. Let us enu- 
 merate some of these features which are especially sought 
 for in a speaker. 
 
 (a) Magnetism 
 
 The term magnetism is often used instead of good 
 personality. It is peculiarly applicable to successful 
 speakers and directs attention not so much to what is the 
 source of the man's power as to the effect it has upon 
 others. By magnetism we mean a composite of personal 
 attributes which draws people to the speaker and tends to 
 incline them to sympathize with or rally around him. 
 An old gentleman once recounted to the writer the fol- 
 lowing incident in the life of Henry Ward Beecher. 
 
 The gentleman was from the British West Indies and 
 was visiting New York, just before the Civil War. All 
 his sympathies were with the South on the slavery ques- 
 tion and he could not understand why people like 
 Beecher should agitate for abolition. Yet, out of curi- 
 osity, he went one Sunday to the Broadway Tabernacle 
 to hear Beecher speak on slavery. In those days, such 
 special lectures were advertised by hand sticko-s or 
 posters slapped up against telegraph poles and walls. 
 On this occasion the announcement said, ** Henry Ward 
 Beecher will speak on Slavery, at the Broadway Taber- 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 131 
 
 iiacle, " etc., etc. Tliere was in New York at that time 
 a volunteer fire company made up of ruffians who would 
 now be called election repeaters and strong-arm men. 
 It was led by a great bully and corrupt politician — 
 let us call him John Doe. The posters had not been 
 up long before there appeared, under the announcement 
 that Beecher would speak, the words, "Like Hell he 
 will. — John Doe." Consequently, those who attended 
 the lecture came expecting trouble and possibly blood- 
 shed. The gentleman from the West Indies was in the 
 front of the gallery. As he looked down, he saw there 
 on the ground floor, filling all the seats back from the 
 stage one-third into the house, a great number of the 
 red-shirted, volunteer firemen-ruffians. The leader stood 
 in front cursing and threatening in violent language 
 what he would do to Beecher. At the appointed time, 
 Beecher suddenly ascended the steps of the platform 
 and began to speak. There was a pause in the uproar 
 and then dead silence. Even John Doe and his follow- 
 ers were hushed. In that, moment Beecher became 
 master. The stranger in the gallery afterward said, 
 ''If that red-shirted devil had dared to stir a finger to 
 harm Henry Ward Beecher, I'd have jumped down on 
 his neck and killed him." Others must have felt tlie 
 same way; even the would-be rioters were subdued by 
 the spiritual power of the speaker. This was a victory 
 of character, personality, and magnetism, quite inde- 
 pendent of ivhat Beecher said. 
 
 Possibly we do not often get such a dramatic proof of 
 the power of magnetism, but we have all experienced the 
 force which some men display in manner, attitude, and 
 presence — external signs of something permanent and 
 admirable within. Others, less fortunate, have to con- 
 
132 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 tend not only with the audience but also against their 
 own unfortunate selves. Before enumerating some of 
 the foremost elements of a good personality or magnet- 
 ism, we may note two things: First, magnetism is 
 purely subjective — it resides in the speaker irrespective 
 of what he is saying at a given time ; second, it seems to 
 have a twofold source — mental and physical. We shall 
 list mental traits first. 
 
 1. Friendliness is the first attribute of a magnetic 
 speaker. His attitude toward those he addresses is one 
 of trustfulness. He approaches with a coiifiding air; 
 he treats them as friends. The opposites of this are 
 coldness, arrogance, superiority, and distrust. It is 
 well known that every speech occasion is made by the 
 audience as well as the speaker. He contributes to the 
 situation, but so do they. What they add depends 
 greatly upon the friendliness he displays. If they feel 
 his cordiality, they will respond and the very atmos- 
 phere will vibrate with stimulating good feeling between 
 the two. 
 
 The young speaker must not get the notion that he 
 can easily pretend to be friendly, that he can smile and 
 assume an agreeable air when delivering a particular 
 speech. All this may help, but the real spirit of uni- 
 versal friendliness must be a permanent part of his char- 
 acter. If such is not the case, isolated pretenses of 
 friendliness are apt to be patronizing performances 
 which repel by their conscious condescension. Now the 
 question arises, how can one develop this trait if it is 
 wanting or weak? 
 
 At all times, the speaker must be friendly in thought 
 and act. His daily intercourse with all people must be 
 frank, cordial, and interested. He must converse with 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 133 
 
 the deck hand on the ferry boat, the conductor on the 
 car, and all classes of men. He must speak to them about 
 their affairs, their interests, and their views. In a sim- 
 ple and straightforward way, he must mingle with all 
 and enjoy the contact. 
 
 Examine yourself well and see if there is any shrink- 
 ing from your fellows, any awkwardness, any aloofness. 
 If it exists, set about to eradicate it; cultivate acquain- 
 tances, and make many friends. At least try to be 
 friendly; let your attitude be one of welcome and good 
 will. 
 
 2. Sympatliy is not identical with friendliness, though 
 it may be a consequent. We know many good-natured, 
 friendly people who never have any insight into our feel- 
 ings and wdio never understand us. They mean well, but 
 they have no penetration or understanding. The word 
 sympathy means to feel with another. A sympathetic 
 person is able to sense a situation, to enter into the feel- 
 ings of others, to appreciate their attitudes. One reason 
 why a great many well-meaning men can never become 
 successful speakers is that they are unable to get the other 
 fellow's point of view or to apprehend his joys and 
 pains. Edward Rowland Sill expressed it very well in 
 his Fool's Prayer when he said: 
 
 These clurasy feet, still in the mire, 
 Go crushing blossoms without end ; 
 These hard, well-meaning hands we thrust 
 Among the heart-strings of a friend. 
 
 The ill-timed truth we might have kept — 
 Who knows how sharp it pierced and stung ? 
 The word we had not sense to say — 
 Who knows how grandly it had rung? 
 
134 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 The speaker must know, through sympathy, just 
 where the heart is sore and just what is the word to 
 cheer. One false step here may estrange individuals 
 and whole audiences to such an extent that nothing can 
 possibly be said to win their trust and support. 
 
 In political and social (economic) speeches, the matter 
 of sympathy with the hearers is very important. No 
 headway can be made when the apparently strange 
 point of view of the other fellow is not seen and under- 
 stood. Those who are well fixed with the world's goods, 
 speaking from pulpit and political platform, often fail 
 utterly to understand the dissatisfaction and bitterness 
 of the poor ; nor can they sympathize with the hot, blind 
 revolt against economic oppression and social inequality. 
 They are incapable of knowing the hearts they seek to 
 win. So, also, the rule works the other way. Often 
 labor agitators and social reformers, who seek perfectly 
 reasonable and laudable ends, fail when addressing a 
 cultivated audience because they are unable to sympa- 
 thize with the point of view which the ''upper half" 
 holds. It will not do to say, "Their view is wrong; I'll 
 have none of it." If the object is frankly to antagonize 
 and win through crushing force, very well; but few 
 movements can win through sheer, crushing, brute force. 
 Even though a speaker cannot approve the ideas, atti- 
 tudes, and feelings of his audience, he must be able to 
 put himself sympathetically in their place and work 
 around to new ideals, with that place as the starting 
 point. A good father understands the impulses of his 
 wayward boy ; it is that very thing which enables him 
 to deal effectively with his son. 
 
 Sympathy comes only from wide experience and the 
 *'rul)bing against" one's fellow-men. But even this is 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 135 
 
 not enough; the student must forget himself for a time 
 and take an interest in the affairs of people apart from 
 his own, narrow interests. The best practical way to 
 get into this sympathetic relation with others is to do 
 them servi ces a nd sho w t heiii kindne sses. It is not 
 merely a piece of goody-goody advice to say to the 
 oratorical aspirant, "Forget yourself and become ab- 
 sorbed in acts of kindness"; for it is only through that 
 sort of intercourse that the heart of mankind becomes 
 as an open book. It is a wonderfully interesting book 
 which tells much to eyes sometimes blinded by tears, 
 sometimes hardened by glimpses of depravity, but far, 
 far more often lighted up by a thrilling insight into 
 unexpected, fundamental^ nobility. 
 
 It is difficult to say where sympathy does the speaker 
 the greater service — in the intelligent search for truth 
 or in the skilful imparting of it after it is found. 
 Through it, his understanding of all things is broadened 
 and deepened ; through it he makes it most acceptable to 
 the audience which he understands and knows how to 
 handle. 
 
 Again, let us give the warning that pretense will not 
 do; neither can it be worked up for special occasions. 
 Each address shows it as an individual exhibition of a 
 broad and permanent part of the speaker's character. 
 That character is built up day by day, hour by hour, 
 while speaking in public, in private conversation, 
 during personal observation and even in the silence of 
 meditation. 
 
 To speak this way of sympathy as an essential part 
 of a speaker's character does not imply that all speeches 
 should be mild in tone and of a gentle, pleading kind. 
 It does mean that the sympathetic speaker senses the 
 
136 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING ♦ 
 
 tone which will be most effective; he gets in touch with 
 the prevailing condition of the audience-mind. If some 
 thing must be vigorously denounced, by all means let 
 the speaker be vehement in his righteous indignation. 
 But let him not denounce what the audience is unpre- 
 pared to hear treated in that manner. Sympathy will 
 tell him where he must get them before opening the 
 attack. 
 
 3. Earnestness is next to be considered. In a sense, 
 it balances frieiidttness and sympathy, for while they 
 tend to make a man considerate, this characteristic 
 drives him right onward, sometimes even rough-shod, 
 to his object. Earnestness may be called the impelling 
 or motive force within the speaker which arises because 
 of his interest in the audience, his theme, or some object 
 he expects to accomplish. No man can be in earnest 
 who does not believe what he says or who is indifferent 
 to its effect upon his hearers. When the trait does 
 exist, it is of considerable weight, for earnestness covers 
 a multitude of the sins of bad delivery and poor 
 arrangement. 
 
 The road to earnestness is honesty. Say only what 
 you truly believe and say it for reasons which strongly 
 commend themselves to your judgment. Never speak 
 merely for the sake of saying something, but arise when 
 you have a real object before you and when you are sure 
 you have matter which is worthy of utterance and likely 
 to accomplish that object. 
 
 In Lesson 8, we spoke of sincerity as one of the qual- 
 ities of a speaker which, during tlie opening remarks, 
 win the good will of the audience. Sincerity and earnest- 
 ness are closely related and often go together. In fact, 
 sustained earnestness — intensitv of conviction and force 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OP DELIVERY 137 
 
 of expression — usually imply the existence of sincerity. 
 But earnestness is the broader term; it connotes not 
 only honest, straightforwardness but also steady, eager, 
 persistent etfort in the desired direction. Be earnest in 
 your research, earnest in your attention to plan and 
 organization, and above all, be earnest in your delivery. 
 This last will be most natural if the others exist first. 
 In short, keep your object before you from the very 
 beginning and strive toward it with all your might. 
 
 4. Cansd£jtw^_is a potent influence on personality. 
 We do not expect to treat it exhaustively here. But 
 this much can be said : If a man is advocating a cause 
 which is not approved by his conscience, his power w^ith 
 an audience is greatly reduced. Two classes of persons 
 make out successful cases — those of great virtue and 
 clear conscience and those immoral beings with no con- 
 sciences at all. But fortunately for the world, there are 
 very few^ of the latter. Most men, even wicked ones, have 
 consciences which can be abused. 
 
 This matter of conscience is not only a thing directly 
 connected with the object of a particular speech; it has 
 a wider bearing. We need not argue to prove that a 
 man is handicapped when he tries to present to an audi- 
 ence a case which he knows is false or "queer." But 
 we do wish to state a less obvious truth, namely, that a 
 man whose conscience is gnawing at him for any reason 
 whatsoever is thereby less capable to treat effectively 
 any subject, whether or not it is related to the thing- 
 bothering his conscience. For this inner embarrassment 
 interferes with his frank relations with men. He has 
 something to conceal, he is on the defensive, his air is 
 evasive. Meditation on this subject makes us realize the 
 deep significance of the statement concerning Sir Galahad 
 
138 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 — that his strength was of a hundred men because his 
 heart was pure. Let no man try to move others while 
 his conscience is reminding him of his unfitness. 
 
 5. Physical Wcll-Being obviously augments magnet- 
 ism. Since speaking, in one way, is a physical feat, a 
 sound constitution is a necessary aid. The speaker's 
 lungs must be well developed, his throat and vocal ap- 
 paratus in good condition. We have already considered 
 the matters of posture and breathing; later we shall give 
 the general hygiene or health rules for a speaker. 
 
 But good health also has a psychological effect upon 
 audience and speaker. Men are drawn to the speaker 
 who is physically vigorous and in good tone. He need 
 not be exceedingly large (though that sometimes helps) 
 but the appearance of fitness attracts others. 
 
 The greatest influence that good health has is upon 
 the mind of the speaker himself. It makes him think 
 clearly and act with sureness and confidence. When 
 the physical tone is low, one becomes timid, querulous, 
 uncertain of himself. Physical well-being is the founda- 
 tion of mental balance. 
 
 6. Other Less General Contributions to Personality 
 Are to he Desired. While all men can cultivate to a 
 high degree, friendliness, sympathy, earnestness, con- 
 science, and physical fitness, by much the same methods, 
 tliere are other magnetic traits which are more individual 
 or particular. Among these are wit, humor, resourceful- 
 ness, breadth of information, and individual charms and 
 specialties. Here we can give no definite directions for 
 their cultivation though we fully recognize the power of 
 individuality. Later we shall me it this topic again. But 
 even at this point of development, the student may profit 
 by one hint: Whatever is lacking in individual magnet- 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASI'ECTS OF DELIVERY 139 
 
 ism may be fostered and whatever exists to a small 
 extent, ^^•ill be augmented by much practice in actual 
 speech-making. To enlarge your individual powers, 
 practice. 
 
 2. Confidence 
 
 Whatever the general personality or magnetism of a 
 speaker may be, he must have confidence during the 
 actual delivery of a particular address. By confidence 
 we do not mean self-control, for one who is carried away 
 by his passions and loses his temper may be a man with 
 a great deal of confidence though of very little self- 
 control. We do mean by confidence a trait which en- 
 ables us to be natural — to be ourselves. One has con- 
 fidence when he has no fear or hesitancy when facing 
 an audience and delivering a speech. He may do poorly, 
 l)ut if he is confident, his shortcomings are due to his 
 limitations as a thinker, a speaker, and a man, and not 
 to a temporary apprehension or fear. Confidence, then, 
 is a steadying trust in self, ease of mind, freedom from 
 fear, and an assurance that all will be well. 
 
 The opposites of confidence are trepidation, fear, 
 panic, and nervousness. Let us suppose that a great 
 banker knows more about currency and banlving prob- 
 lems than any other man in the country. He is the 
 master mind in the field of finance. But all his life he 
 has been confined to his business and has never ad- 
 dressed large audiences. Suddenly he is called upon 
 to outline his plan for baulking reform before the legisla- 
 ture. Of what use is his great stock of knowledge to 
 him at this juncture, if the unusual situation of making 
 a speech to senators and congressmen throws him into 
 
140 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 a panic? A better showing might be made and more 
 good accomplished by a professional speaker who had 
 crammed enough information to meet the immediate 
 needs of the occasion. Confidence, an ease which en- 
 ables us to use our powers to the full, is fundamental 
 to efficient speaking. 
 
 (a) Confidence — A Tiling to Be Preserved, not to Be 
 Acquired 
 
 Confidence is not so much a positive virtue as the 
 absence of weakness. Confidence is normal and lack of 
 it is abnormal. As a rule, men going about their regu- 
 lar business in life do so with confidence ; it is the unusual 
 or exceptional thing which suddenly robs them of it. 
 How, then, shall we preserve our usual equanimity, even 
 under the stress of public address? Our jjroblem is 
 not to create a new characteristic, but to prevent our 
 losing a good trait when making a speech. Let us 
 therefore see what are the things which pull our ease 
 and complacency from under us so that we fail, through 
 embarrassment. 
 
 The undertaking of something which is strange or 
 new, especially in the presence of others, tends to de- 
 stroy confidence. The uncertainty or newness of the 
 activity is the basic reason for loss of confidence, and 
 the presence of others is an additional aggravating or 
 embarrassing circumstance. School teachers who con- 
 duct their classes with the calm of a postmistress lick- 
 ing a postage stamp, report that they trembled with" 
 timidity the first time they faced a room full of pupils. 
 But repeating the performance made it commonplace 
 jind usual. The first safeguai'd against a loss of con- 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OB^ DELIVERY 141 
 
 fidence is much speaking in public. Begin modestly and 
 join in all the discussions of any club, order, or society 
 to which you may belong. Gradually lengthen your 
 contributions to discussion or debate, until the thing 
 becomes ordinary or usual. This matter of newness or 
 strangeness is the stumbling-block of inexperienced 
 speakers. 
 
 (h) Preparation and Confidence 
 
 The second destroyer of confidence is the knowledge 
 on the part of the speaker that he is poorly prepared. 
 This is the AVaterloo of the experienced speaker. Often 
 one who has had much practice as a speaker and who 
 has been successful attempts to speak impromptu on 
 subjects not properly mastered. Sometimes he makes 
 a strong beginning, but as he realizes that his material 
 is poor in quality and unorganized in arrangement, he 
 begins to flounder and his confidence leaves him. With 
 this, his panic increases and, unless he wisely cuts the 
 address short, he gets deeper and deeper into trouble, 
 making a most unfavorable exhibition of himself. It 
 naturally follows therefore that one should have ample 
 material well mastered not only as to content but also 
 as to arrangement. The ideas must be so thoroughly 
 mastered that the speaker will never be seized with the 
 apprehension that possibly he might be at a loss for 
 something to say. The greatest fear of the good speaker 
 is that he will be on his feet, before the audience, with 
 nothing to say. Yet it is the difficulty most easily pro- 
 vided against. Follow the simple rule "Never attempt 
 to speak impromptu at any length." If the speech be 
 written out and read, the preparation should be so thor- 
 
142 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ough that the speaker has no fear that he will stumble 
 in the reading. If it be written and committed to mem- 
 ory, the memorizing should be perfect. If it be pre- 
 pared in thought but extemporaneous in form (as most 
 of the best speeches are), it should be thoroughly pre- 
 pared. It is to this last kind of preparation that we 
 pay most attention, for this is the style of address most 
 useful to the average man of affairs. 
 
 (c) Rules for the Preservation of Confidence 
 
 From the two principles of confidence through fa- 
 miliarity and confidence through preparation we get the 
 following practical rules : 
 
 1. Set yourself a definite task for each speech. 
 
 2. Have the task simple enough so that it is not beyond 
 a speaker at your stage of development. 
 
 3. Have it thoroughly planned and mastered. 
 
 4. Do not be tempted to go beyond tlie ])lan. 
 
 5. Sit down when through. 
 
 6. Do ALL OF THESE VERY OFTEN. 
 
 (d) Auto-Suggestion and Confidence* 
 
 It has been said by some who ought to know about 
 confidence (for they are in a sense, confidence men) tliat 
 it should be developed by a process of self-suggestion — 
 a sort of auto-hypnotism. Their practical direction is 
 that the speaker say to himself each day, words to this 
 effect: '^I am a powerful thinker; my ideas are pro- 
 found and I grow greater every day. I see myself sway- 
 ing audiences; I believe and know I am a convincing 
 speaker; the others believe it, too." 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 143 
 
 The principle is true, but the suggestious are uot the 
 best. To a certain extent we grow into what we suggest 
 to ourselves we ought to be. It is also true that a good 
 opinion of one's^^^f soiiietinies fosters a like opinion 
 in others. Usuall}^ when it is empty conceit it has an 
 opposite effect. Therefore it is foolish to persuade your- 
 self that you are profound and eloquent when you are 
 not. Suppose a little peanut-head of an individual were 
 to succeed in convincing himself that he is a master 
 mind. Having no real attainments, he becomes an in- 
 sufferable pest because of his empty cockiness. 
 
 It is true, that if we face audiences with fear and 
 uncertainty, we are defeated before the battle begins. 
 It is also true that one who constantly depreciates him- 
 self will lose in impressiveness. But on the other hand, 
 our suggestions should be based on real merit and be 
 calculated to build up constantly not only confidence 
 but a just ground for it. Woe unto him of inflated con- 
 fidence when he gets before an audience and discovers 
 that he has nothing to deliver. Consequently we rec- 
 ommend that one do not suggest to himself that, in gen- 
 eral, he is a person of much weight; but rather that he 
 suggest,* before each specific task, that he is well pre- 
 pared and thoroughly fit to carry it out successfully. 
 
 The statements to be reiterated may be: 
 
 1. I have thoroughly prepared this matter. 
 
 2. I possess fully tested evidence that my ideas are 
 sound. 
 
 3. They are worth standing up for. 
 
 4. I will deliver them as prepared and then sit down. 
 
 5. Thus, certain of my thoroughly prepared and care- 
 fully arranged matter, I cannot fail; the audience will 
 agree with me. 
 
144 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 If this be done each time any task is undertaken, gen- 
 eral confidence, resting on a sure foundation, will be 
 steadily built up. 
 
 3. Self- Control 
 
 A lack of self-control is the besetting sin of very 
 vigorous and enthusiastic speakers. These men often 
 work themselves up to a state of such excitement that 
 they (a) exaggerate, (b) say things they had not planned 
 or wanted to say, (c) forget to say what they wanted to 
 say, and (d) display feelings which they should have 
 restrained. Any newspaper reporter will tell you how 
 general is the fault of poor self-control. Public men, 
 because of it, make speeches for which thej are sorry 
 and sometimes, we regret to state, they brand a true 
 report of such an address as a lie. Newspapers are 
 blamed for ''misstatements" which in reality are the 
 true records of utterances made without self-control. 
 
 The most general precaution to insure self-control is 
 careful planning. The tendency is to adhere to a well- 
 made plan, while lack of preparation encourages the 
 pursuit of any chance fancy. Yet one may have the 
 opportunity to modify a plan successfully because of 
 some circumstance which emerges during the delivery 
 of the speech. If, in embracing such an opportunity, or 
 if the speaker realizes that, for any other cause, he is 
 not having himself well in hand, then a remedy must 
 be found. 
 
 The best retreat ^vhen self-control is beginning to slip 
 away, is to pause, go slowly, and cast about for a means 
 of retui'ning to the safe phm or of terminating the speech 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 145 
 
 gracefully. Imitate the tortoise. When in troubl(>, he 
 stops, draws into his shell, and then goes ahead slowl}'. 
 
 4. Tact 
 
 Read once more the little extract about tact on ])age 
 10 of Lesson 1. It says that tact is not a sixth sense, 
 but the life of all five. A tactful person sees little things 
 hidden from others, he hears unspoken opinions, he 
 senses a situation. Volumes could be written on this 
 subject. AVe have time for but three brief remarks. 
 
 (a) Tact comes from much contact with other people. 
 This intercourse must be wide and intimate so that their 
 multitudinous peculiarities are impressed — sometimes 
 even without the student's being aware of it. Tact is 
 developed through mistakes. If one is pricked by an- 
 other's resentment, the lesson teaches him to avoid that 
 line of communication. The tact of a speaker is but a 
 complex combination attained after much intercourse 
 with individuals and many appearances before audiences. 
 
 (b) In speaking, tact is usually more a matter of know- 
 ing what not to say than what to say. People offend, 
 generally, when they grow expansive and over-amplify. 
 Sometimes a speaker will try to cram down the throats 
 of his audience what his judg-ment tells him they will not 
 tolerate. This is a great mistake. It is far better to 
 leave a thought unsaid than to say it when it is sure to 
 have a bad effect. Of course one cannot be instructed in 
 the details of tact, but a speaker will be working in the 
 right direction if he inclines to the side of brevity ratlier 
 than verl)osity. 
 
 (c) Tact is a general development which can be at- 
 tained through the cultivation of all the virtues men- 
 
146 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 tioned in this lesson and through constant contact with 
 all sorts of people in all sorts of gatherings. 
 
 5. Conclusion 
 
 Character, personality, tact — in fact all virtues which 
 make for social (and that means oratorical) success are 
 the general results of many particular victories. No one 
 can have a pleasant disposition who has not thought 
 many pleasant thoughts and done many kind acts. 
 Masterful confidence is the result of a multitude of small 
 tasks successfully planned and carried out. General 
 earnestness grows out of interest in a number of worthy 
 objects. Therefore we suggest that each evening the 
 speaker set aside a "time for reflection" when he can 
 quietly review the details of the day's affairs. At such 
 a time he may take stock of Inmself, asking: 
 
 Reflection Hour 
 
 1. Did I make a new friend today! 
 
 2. Did I let pass an opportunity to make a friend ! 
 
 (a) If so, why! 
 
 (b) Did pride stand in the way! 
 
 (c) Did selfishness! 
 
 (d) Did bashfulness! 
 
 (e) Did fear or cowardice! 
 
 (f) Did any bitterness or inner embarrassment! 
 
 (g) Then, what did? 
 
 3. Did I niako, oi- lei sli]), a chance acquaintance! 
 
 4. Did I do anything to mak(» some one happier! 
 
 5. Did I let slip such an opportunity? Why? 
 (). Did anvone coufide in me today ! 
 
SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF DELIVERY 147 
 
 7. Did I offend anyone today I 
 
 (a) If so, was it necessary! 
 
 (b) Did it serve any good purpose! 
 
 (c) Did I lose personally by itf 
 
 (d) What difference did it make in my temporary 
 mental quiet, in my general disposition, in 
 my actions! 
 
 (e) Did it, even for a time, make me less efficient 
 in the performance of some duty or less 
 pleasant to others with whom I had no 
 quarrel whatsoever! 
 
 8. Did I learn something new today that I can "pass 
 on" to others or that will increase my efficiency! 
 
 (a) AVhat from a book! 
 
 (b) What from the speech of others! 
 
 (c) What from personal observation! 
 
 9. Did I do or say something I cannot thoroughly ap- 
 prove! Something wiiich hurt someone? Is this 
 becoming habitual! 
 
 10. Is there something undone or unsaid which I ought 
 to have done or said or can yet do or say! 
 
 Note. — (Do it now, if possible; if not, make a memo- 
 randum which will be followed at the proper time.) 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exercises in this entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Koep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 First Day. — You have read through the lesson. Now study it 
 again carefully, niasteriug its contents. Do not attempt any 
 of the exercises until after the second reading. 
 
 ^Second Day. — Select for a speech with at least three sub-topics, 
 one of the following subjects : 
 
148 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 1. Tiie Federal Government should (or should not) regulate 
 
 "big business." 
 
 2. President Wilson is (or is not) right in his contention 
 
 that the slackness in business is psychological. 
 
 3. Workmen should (or should not) be compensated b}^ so- 
 
 ciet}^ according to their needs rather than their esti- 
 mated productivity. 
 
 4. The denial of the right of women to vote is in accordance 
 
 with (or counter to) the provisions of the Constitution. 
 
 5. Some other subject in which you are interested. 
 Devote this day to careful reading and note-taking on the 
 
 subject. 
 
 Third Day. — Further reading and note-taking. Whenever using 
 
 material not your own, be sure to label all material with 
 
 author's name and the place where found. 
 Fourth Day. — "Slake a plan of your proposed speech. Work it 
 
 out very carefully, using in the most effective way all your 
 
 personal knowledge and all the material you gathered. 
 Fifth Day. — Apply the list of rules on page 142 and statements 
 
 on page 143. Then commit your outline to memory and 
 
 orally develop your speech. Keep a list of all the sources 
 
 of information you consulted. 
 
 Final Word 
 
 From now on, keep the precautions on page 142 always 
 in mind when working on a speech. 
 
 Go over the list of assertions on page 143 every day 
 in connection with a speech or other task yon had to 
 perform. 
 
 Every evening indulge in the Eeflection Hour outlined 
 on page 146. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 Those questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knnwletige of the principles in tliis h'sson. 'J'hey 
 iire siun/csfirc nu-rely, dealinji laroely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What do we mean by a good personality? What is mag- 
 netism ? 
 
 2. Have you ever liad dealings with a man against whom you 
 had ])een prejudiced, but who won your respect? Can you tell 
 just what there was about him which impressed you? 
 
 3. What advantages could you gain as a speaker through 
 friendliness? What advantages in your usual lousiness? Coidd 
 you lose anything? 
 
 4. Is sympathy a sign of weakness or of strength ? What can 
 a speaker gain in preparing his matter through his ability to 
 sympathize? How does it help his delivery? 
 
 5. What do you mean by earnestness? How does it differ 
 from forwardness ? Is it ever apt to lead to forwardness ? 
 
 6. Have you ever had something on your conscience which 
 affected your thoughts on other topics, the tone of your voice, 
 and your attitude to individuals and groups? 
 
 7. Which is more important, intellectual equipment or 
 physical well-being? Are they related at all? Why should a 
 speaker be in especially good physical condition? 
 
 8. What is the difference between confidence and conceit? 
 Why do you dislike a conceited man? Why do you approve 
 a confident man? 
 
 9. Why must general self-reliance and confidence be sought 
 through particular, small deeds? 
 
 10. What are the two surest precautions to secure con- 
 fidence ? 
 
 149 
 
150 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 11. Is it well to lie to other people ? Is it well to lie to your- 
 self about yourself? What kind of auto-suggestion is best to 
 help build up confidence? 
 
 12. Who is the most tactful person you know ? What seems 
 to be the secret of that person 's success ? 
 
 13. What do you think of the possible benefit to be reaped 
 from our Reflection Hour questions? 
 
 1-4. On the basis of 100 per cent for a "perfect" personality, 
 what would you grade yourself? Your best chum? Your boss? 
 A number of friends ? 
 
 15. What percentage in your good i)ersonality scale Avoiild 
 you give for perfection in the following lines : 
 
 Tact? Physical Weil-Being? 
 
 Magnetism? Wit? 
 
 Friendliness ? Education ? 
 
 Sympathy ? Resourcefulness ? 
 
 Earnestness? Self Control? 
 Confidence ? 
 
 What others would you add? 
 
 16. What are the rules given for the preservation of confi- 
 dence ? 
 
 17. What is the value of auto-suggestion? 
 
 18. Could you build up a "Reflection Hour" along the lines 
 of "personal efficiency" and daily work? 
 
u 
 
 LESSON 9 
 
 IMAGES AND THE MIND OF THE AUDIENCE 
 
 In our first six lessons, we assumed that the speaker 
 had a purpose to accomplish through the delivery of a 
 mass of material, referred to as the message. Those 
 lessons were designed to indicate an effective way to 
 adjust the message as a whole to the mental condition 
 of the hearer. The principal means suggested was a 
 judicious organization of the main subdivisions of the 
 speech. But details of treatment, such as the choice 
 and arrangement of words, the description of scenes, 
 the narration of events, or the use of evidence in argu- 
 ment — all these were subordinated and, for a time, neg- 
 lected in order to focus attention upon the larger mat- 
 ters of planning. We shall now take up the study of 
 the details of speech composition. 
 
 1. Word-Painting, or the Representation of Images 
 
 (a) Images and Important Detail of the Organized 
 Whole 
 
 This does not mean that we are to set aside and for- 
 get the general principles of larger organization. The 
 perfection of a student in his treatment of details must 
 not be at the expense of good general planning. If the 
 structure of a whole speech is poor but some detail of 
 description is beautifully worked out, the effect is ridicu- 
 lous because a part attracts more attention than the 
 whole. Good organization i nsures tha t each detail used 
 in JJie_.de.Yelapinent_wilLJie_gi^:fiii_its just emphasis or 
 . JTnpnrt flTicp — no more and no less. 
 
 151 
 
152 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Another good reason for keeping the principles of gen- 
 eral arrangement in mind is that they are useful guides 
 even in the treatment of details. For instance, just as a 
 favorable emotional set may be needed to pave the way 
 for an entire address, so also it is often desirable to pre- 
 pare the audience in a similar manner for the reception 
 of a particular incident. While interest and attention 
 must be secured in relation to the whole message, like 
 attitudes must always be maintained if a detail is to 
 make its own impression. Furthermore, it is almost as 
 important to plan the arrangement of minor descrip- 
 tions and to fit their new thoughts to the intellectual 
 capacity of the auditors as to make similar precautions 
 for the oration as a whole. Indeed, the same principles 
 are applied. The principles of favorable emotional set, 
 attention, interest, adjustment to previous knowledge, 
 and sequence of parts are so universal that they apply 
 first to the general plan, then to each division, and doAvn 
 to the smallest subdivision. 
 
 When we speak of the details which make up or com- 
 pose a message, we mean the smallest mental states 
 (thoughts, feelings, impressions, ideas, reasons, etc.) 
 which a speaker has in his own mind and which he seeks 
 to re-create in the minds of his hearers. For instance, 
 the speaker may have a clear impression of a great mul- 
 titude cheering one who speaks for freedom. He might 
 close his eyes and, in imagination, see the animated 
 orator, high above the crowd, his attitude majestic, his 
 face as one inspired, his gestures bold, and his voice like 
 the bugle call to battle. This picture we term a mental 
 image. He who experiences it wishes it to arise and be- 
 come just as vivid for each of his hearers as it is for 
 himself. He also wants them to' feel the same thrill 
 which he feels as he recalls the original, stirring scene. 
 Or, on the other hand, he may have in mind a recollection 
 
IMAGES ■ 153 
 
 of the ideal of liberty which was behind the message of 
 the orator. Such an abstract notion we term a concept. 
 The speaker may want to expound the concept to those 
 about him. More intricate still, he may have an elabor- 
 ate line of argument to establish for their acceptance, 
 justifying the speech of his hero. These are typical 
 mental states which, more or less complex, are welded to- 
 gether as the details that go to make up the message of 
 the speaker. All of them must be reproduced in the 
 minds of the hearers, not only as they arise individually, 
 but also as they are integral parts of an organized whole. 
 Before we leave the topic of details of composition, we 
 shall treat the more important and clearly distinguish- 
 able mental states which a speaker may have and which 
 he may wish to transfer to the audience by means of 
 words. Just now^ we wish to confine ourselves to images, 
 or mental pictures. These are not abstract notions of 
 goodness or badness, right or wrong, beauty or ugli- 
 ness; they are vivid recollections of something actually 
 seen, heard, felt, or tasted. Their originals were real 
 persons, things, and events. They live in the mind of the 
 speaker and he seeks to re-create them for his hearers. 
 
 (h) Word-Pa lilting 
 
 One who can arouse vivid, concrete pictures by his 
 Y/ords is sometimes called a word-painter. 
 
 When Amruzail describes what he has seen, 
 Speaking of sands and flocks and hilltops green, 
 Such magic in his voice and language lies, 
 That all his hearers' ears are turned to eyes. 
 
 The ability to do this is one of the most fundamental 
 attainments necessary to the effectiveness of a speaker. 
 But just what does he paint? Some idea of the nature 
 of the mental image which he re-creates has already 
 
154 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 been given. But we may well pause to make the subject 
 clearer by illustration. 
 
 Slowly and critically read the following passage from 
 Edward Everett's "The Glories of Morning." 
 
 The blue sky now turned more softly gray ; the great watch- 
 stars shut up their holy eyes ; the east began to kindle. Faint 
 streaks of purple now blushed along the sky ; the whole celes- 
 tial concave was filled with the inflowing tides of the morning 
 light, which came pouring down from above in one great 
 ocean of radiance ; till at length, as we reached the Blue Hills, 
 a flash of purple fire blazed out from above the horizon, and^ 
 turned the dewy tear-drops of flower and leaf into rubies and 
 diamonds. In a few seconds the everlasting gates of the morn- 
 ing were thrown wide open, and the lord of day, arrayed in 
 glories too severe for the gaze of man, began his state. 
 
 Notice that Everett does not express any generaliza- 
 tions, such as ''The sunrise is most inspiring" or "The 
 first light of day is thrilling to the beholder." If he 
 had said such things, they might have been accepted as 
 true, but no strong realization of the picture of the sky 
 at sunrise would have been obtained. Instead he re- 
 vives the actual colors and brightness of the sky just as 
 they strike a beholder at a particular time and place. 
 He does not use such words as "pleasant," "soothing," 
 or "beautiful" as he describes the first streaks of light; 
 nor does he label the last burst of sunlight as "thrill- 
 ing," "dazzling," or "inspiring." He simply re-cre- 
 ates the pictures and lets them make their own sub- 
 jective impressions on the hearers. This is objective 
 word-painting. 
 
 Now read the following from Victor Hugo's speech 
 in defense of his son on the question of capital punish- 
 ment. (The introduction to this speech has already 
 been given in Lesson 4, page 50.) Notice that Hugo also 
 re-creates an actual scene. But he colors it with his 
 own feelings. The object is not so much to make clear 
 
IMAGES > . 155 
 
 his own horror as to fill the hearers with horror. Just 
 whether expressing his own feelings makes the impres- 
 sion deeper than it would be if the scene were objectively 
 presented to make its own appeal, is a difficult question 
 to settle. But this is a good example of an orator ^s at- 
 tempt, not only to re-create a scene, but also to express 
 the feeling it aroused in an original witness. 
 
 What are the circumstances? A man, a convict, a sentenced 
 wretch is dragged, on a certain morning, to one of the public 
 squares. There he finds the scaffold ! He shudders, he strug- 
 .gles, he refuses to die. He is young yet — only twenty-nine. 
 Ah! I know what you will say. ''He is a murderer!" But 
 hear me. Two officers seize him. His hands, his feet are tied. 
 He throws off the the two officers. A fearful struggle ensues. 
 His feet, bound as they are, become entangled in the ladder. 
 He uses the scaffold against the scaffold 1 The struggle is 
 prolonged. Horror seizes the crowd. The officers, — sweat and 
 shame on their brows, — pale, panting, terrified, despairing, — 
 despairing with I know not what horrible despair, — shrinking 
 under that public reprobation which ought to have visited 
 the penalty and spared the passive instrument, the execu- 
 tioner, — the officers strive savagely. The victim clings to the 
 scaffold and shrieks for pardon. His clothes are torn, — his 
 shoulders bloody, — still he resists. At length after three 
 quarters of an hour of this monstrous effort, of this spectacle 
 without a name, of this agony,— agony for all, be it under- 
 stood, — agony for the assembled spectators as well as for the con- 
 demned man, — after this age of anguish. Gentlemen of the 
 Jury, they take the poor wretch back to his prison. 
 
 The People breathe again. The People, naturally merciful, 
 hope that the man will be spared. But no, — the guillotine, 
 though vanquished, remains standing. There it frowns all day, 
 in the midst of a sickened population. And at night, the 
 officers, reenforced, drag forth the wretch again, so bound 
 that he is but an inert weight, — they drag him forth, haggard, 
 bloody, weeping, pleading, howling for life, — calling upon God, 
 calling upon his father and mother, — for like a very child had 
 this man become in the prospect of death, — they drag him 
 forth to execution. He is hoisted on the scaffold, and his head 
 falls 1 And then through every conscience runs a shudder. 
 
 These two selections illustrate the way a speaker may 
 want to present to an audience a picture of things just 
 
156 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 as they occur in nature. The simplest mental state to 
 be re-created in the mind of the hearer is the objective 
 image, uncolored by the expression of the emotion it 
 aroused in the speaker. Psychologists would not agree 
 that the image is the simplest possible mental state. 
 They have, by analysis, classified the simplest intellec- 
 tual states as sensations. Thus, if the mind could be im- 
 pressed simply with the sensation of red without as- 
 sociating it with any object, such as an apple, a book, or 
 a dress, then it would experience a simple, isolated sen- 
 sation. But in adult life we seldom, if ever, experience 
 these simple sensations unrelated to an external cause of 
 them. We get our red along with a number of other sen- 
 sations of size, shape, taste, smell, etc., all joined to- 
 gether and coming from a recognized source, such as an 
 apple. This combination makes up our picture, or image, 
 of the apple. Even if a speaker did have a simple, unre- 
 lated sensation in mind, he would have little if any rea- 
 son for trying to convey it to an audience. But there are 
 many good uses for fully composed pictures, or images. 
 Most of the pictures which fill our minds and which 
 we may wish to re-create are far from simple. We see 
 our apples, of many hues of red and yellow, growing on 
 spreading trees with green leaves backed up by the blue 
 of the sky. And as we look, the leaves are lifted by the 
 wind so that they move and make a rustling sound, and 
 the breeze brings to our nostrils the scent of the grass in 
 the meadows and the ripening fruit in the orchard. 
 Consequently, though aware of the theoretical sensation 
 of scientific psychology, we shall consider a wJiole pic- 
 ture as the simplest mental possession which a speaker 
 may want to share with an audience. It is almost im- 
 possible to keep such a picture free from the feeling of 
 pleasure or aversion which naturally accompanies it. As 
 
IMAGES 157 
 
 a result, the pure, objective image is less frequently used 
 than the image colored with subjective feelings. 
 
 (c) Pictures of Rest and of Action 
 
 The representation of images of objects at rest is some- 
 times called "description" by rhetoricians, while the 
 term "narration" is retained to designate the recount- 
 ing of a series of events. But both processes, so far as 
 the mental state of the hearer and the speaker is con- 
 cerned, are essentially the same. They necessitate the 
 re-creation of concrete, actual things, originally per- 
 ceived through the senses as parts of the world of fact. 
 Consequently, whether the speaker treats his audience 
 to an oratorical stereopticon view (one picture at rest) 
 or to a vitagraph reel (a number of pictures represent- 
 ing motion), his own mental work and his method of 
 treatment will be almost identical. In both cases he must 
 recall mental pictures; the first is a single one while the 
 second is a constantly changing series. Indeed, most 
 good narratives begin with a description as the starting 
 point, while the remainder of the discourse merely notes 
 the successive changes in the picture. The added feature 
 is that attention must be particularly paid to the change, 
 involving, as it does, sequence of events, interaction, rate 
 of movement, and conclusion. 
 
 Because of their essential similarity, we shall group 
 together all the impressions which the world of actuality 
 makes upon the mind in the form of images. To arouse, 
 by means of speech, like pictures for the hearer (without 
 attempting to explain or justify them) we call "word- 
 painting. ' ' 
 
 Read the following selection slowly, pronouncing each 
 word to yourself carefully so that each image makes its 
 
158 p EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPE AXING 
 
 3ail: impression. This will make clear the truth that a 
 narrative involves a succession of images. 
 
 Venerable men, you have come down to us from a former 
 generation. Heaven has bounteously lengthened out your 
 lives that you might behold this joyous day. You are now 
 where you stood fifty years ago, this very hour, with your 
 brothers and your neighbors, shoulder to shoulder, in the 
 strife for your country. Behold, how altered! The same 
 heavens are indeed over your head; the same ocean rolls at 
 your feet; but all else, how changed! You hear no roar of 
 hostile cannon ; you see no mixed volumes of smoke and flames 
 rising from burning Charlestown. The ground strewn with 
 the dead and dying; the impetuous charge; the steady and 
 successful repulse; the loud call to repeated assault; the sum- 
 moning of all that is manly to repeated resistance ; a thousand 
 bosoms freely and fearlessly bared in an instant to whatever 
 of terror there may be in war and death — all these you have 
 witnessed, but you witness them no more. All is peace. ^ 
 
 2. The Use of Images in a Speech 
 
 The following are tAT)ical ways in which images may 
 be employed in a speech. 
 
 (a) Used for Their Intrinsic Worth as Information 
 
 We find this use mostly in geographical lectures and 
 travel talks. The modern use of a stereopticon or even 
 moving pictures has reduced the necessity for skillful 
 word-painting by the lecturer. But whether the words 
 of the speaker or the lantern slide is the means, the pur- 
 pose of the image is to make the auditor realize just how, 
 let us say, Mount Blanc or the Matterhorn — great Al- 
 pine peaks — looks. The lecturer is not especially con- 
 cerned as to whether you like the appearance or not. He 
 seeks first to show you nature as it is, whether you like 
 it or not. An engineer trying to make clear to a board 
 of directors the nature of a stretch of country through 
 
 'Webster's First Bunker Hill Address. 
 
IMAGES 159 
 
 which he contemplates constructing a railroad might 
 find it useful to create a series of images of landscapes. 
 
 (b) Used to Convey Strong Emotional Appeal 
 
 We feel most strongly what we can actually realize 
 and we can realize concrete images better than general- 
 izations and abstractions. Eead once more all the ex- 
 tracts quoted thus far to illustrate this lesson. Notice 
 the emotional response you have to Everett's sunrise 
 scene and to Hugo 's guillotine scene. Contrast this with 
 the lack of emotion as you read the argument on Cana- 
 dian reciprocity on page 55 of Lesson 4. If one w^ere to 
 say, ''Public executions are repugnant to humanity," 
 would it arouse so strong a feeling as the detailed imag- 
 ing of a single execution? The newspapers tell us that 
 ten thousand German soldiers fell before Liege. But we 
 cannot conceive the scene; we cannot realize the horrors 
 of the battlefield. Our sympathy, pity, and horror of 
 war's ruthless brutality come forth more readily as we 
 get a true picture of the suffering and death of a single, 
 brave, young soldier boy. 
 
 The following extract from Henry Clay's speech on the 
 war with England shows a skillful use of the concrete, 
 because of its emotion-producing power. 
 
 It is impossible that this country should ever abandon the 
 g:allant ta. - who have won it such splendid trophies. Let us 
 suppose that the Genius of Columbia should visit one of them 
 in his oppressor's prison and attempt to reconcile him to his 
 forlorn and wretched condition. She would saj' to him, in the 
 language of the gentlemen on the other side, "Great Britain 
 intends you no harm ; she did not mean to impress you, but one 
 of her own subjects; having taken you by mistake, I will re- 
 monstrate, and try to prevail upon her, by peaceful means, to 
 release you, but I cannot, my son, fight for you." If he did 
 not consider this mere mockery, the poor tar would address 
 her judgment and say, "You owe me, my country, protection; 
 
160 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 I owe you, in return, obedience. I am no British subject ; I am 
 a native oi old Massachusetts ; where live my aged father, my 
 wife, my children. I have faithfully discharged my duty. 
 Will you refuse to do yours?" Appealing to her passions he 
 would continue: "I lost this eye in fighting under Truxton, 
 with the Insurgente ; I got this scar before Tripoli ; I broke this 
 leg on board the Constitution, when the Guerriere struck." 
 If she remained still unmoved, he would break out in accents 
 of mingled distress and despair — 
 
 "Hardj hard is my fate! once I freedom enjoyed, 
 Was as happy as happy could be ! 
 Oh! how hard is my fate, how galling these chains!" 
 
 I will not imagine the dreadful catastrophe to which he would 
 be driveii, hy an abandonment of him to his oppressor. It will 
 not be, it cannot be, that this country will refuse him pro- 
 tection. 
 
 An emotion is a very vital thing. It is not the cool, 
 well-established sentiment of approval or disapproval 
 that we feel when balancing the pros and cons of a well- 
 worked-out argument. It is an impulsive flood of feel- 
 ing that rushes forth in the face of a lively, concrete ex- 
 perience. In order to be concrete and to succeed in 
 arousing the strongest emotions, a speaker often has to 
 limit the extent of the image he tries to re-create. If 
 one were master enough to make the Avhole, appalling im- 
 pression of a battlefield strike the hearer with all its 
 force, then the most powerful emotions of awe, dread, 
 terror, and revulsion would be stirred. But few are able 
 to conceive such a scene adequately, and even if they 
 could, their re-creations would be beyond the grasp of 
 the average audience. It is for this reason that most 
 orators limit their concrete images. This limitation en- 
 hances the probability of their being realizable, and in 
 proportion to the degree of reality is their emotional 
 effect. 
 
IMAGES 161 
 
 (c) Used as Illustration of a Whole Class of Facts 
 
 It has already been pointed out that images make 
 deep impressions. General ideas make fairly deep im- 
 pressions only on a cultivated few and have next to no 
 influence upon the less-educated members of an audi- 
 ence. Thus, if you wished to make the generalization 
 that a college education tends tc improve the manners 
 and appearance of young men, you would not rest after 
 making the bare statement itself c The general notion 8 
 wrapped up in "manners'' and ''appearance" might 
 not be very clear to some of the hearers. You might 
 more profitably make a picture of young John Williams 
 as he appeared before the college board of entrance ex- 
 amination. Picture his clothing, his awkwardness, his 
 shyness, and his confusion; make the audience see a 
 whole-hearted but rough, country youth. Then draw an- 
 other picture of the calm, polished, self-possessed, and 
 correct John Williams on the commencement platform 
 delivering the valedictory address. These images will 
 not only give very definite meaning to the two words 
 mentioned but will give life to what might be a color- 
 less and but faintly apprehended, general truth. 
 
 The advertisers of patent medicines take advantage of 
 the force of images to represent a general argument. 
 They print a picture of James Smith before taking the 
 treatment and James Smith after taking the treatment. 
 The eye takes in at a glance more than a long, abstract 
 argument could ever supply. 
 
 Obviously, if the speaker intends, not only to elucidate 
 a general thought which is abstract and difficult until a 
 'specific instance is found to make it clear, but also to 
 clothe it with feeling, the image representation is most 
 desirable. In the following passage by the greatest 
 word-painter and prose poet who ever lived, Ingersoll is 
 
162 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 trying to bear home the idea that the pomp and power 
 of the conqueror do not compensate for tlie loss of peace 
 and affection which the humblest peasant can have. But 
 notice how the concrete treatment enhances, not only 
 the thought, but also the feeling. 
 
 I thought of the orphans and widows he had made, of the 
 tears that had been shed for his glory, and of the only woman 
 who ever loved him, pushed from his heart by the cold hand 
 of ambition. And I said, "I would rather have been a French 
 peasant and worn wooden shoes. I would rather have lived 
 in a hut with a vine growing over the door, and the grapes 
 growing purple in the amorous kisses of the autumn sun. I 
 would rather have been that poor peasant, Avith my loving 
 wife by my side, knitting as the day died out of the sky, with 
 my children upon my knees and their arms about me. I would 
 rather have been that man, and gone down to the tongueless 
 silence of the dreamless dust, than to have been that imperial 
 impersonation of force and murder, known as Napoleon the 
 Great.2 
 
 But a word of caution must here be offered. If a spe- 
 cific instance is to be selected to make a general state- 
 ment more forceful and clear in thought and more pro- 
 vocative of emotion, it must be a fair example. During 
 the first two weeks of the great European War of 1914, 
 the papers in America got most of their news from anti- 
 German sources. One day there was a description of the 
 brutal treatment of some French civilians who were 
 caught in Germany before they could return to their own 
 country. The article was most graphic and had for its 
 climax the shooting of one young student who, after 
 many knocks and insults, cried, "Vive la France." Tt 
 is probable that no such scene took place. Furthermore, 
 if it did, it is hardly probable that it was at all typical 
 of what Germany as a whole was doing. We hold no 
 brief for Germany nor the German kaiser; we merely 
 point out that where a specific instance is supposed to 
 
 ^Ingersoll, Robert G., Napoleon. 
 
IMAGES 163 
 
 represent a number of cases or a general principle, the 
 speaker should exercise the greatest care to b i sure that 
 his example is truly representative. The very fact that 
 the particular case makes such a powerful impression 
 creates a strong responsibility to have that case a just 
 and typical one. 
 
 If ever you are opposing another who selects preju- 
 dicial instances, the revelation of his unfair bias is sure 
 to have an effect upon the audience. 
 
 3. The Senses and Image-Making 
 
 It will be noticed that a complete picture or image is 
 made up from the detailed report of the various senses. 
 Thus, Webster's picture of the British charge up Bunker 
 Hill gives the report of the eyes when it refers to the 
 sky above and the ocean rolling below, the men standing 
 shoulder to shoulder, and the ground strewn with the 
 dead and dying. The ear contribution is evident in the 
 '^roar of hostile cannon"; the senses of touch and mus- 
 cular effort are also there, certainly for the veterans to 
 whom Webster is speaking — men who had taken part in 
 the hand-to-hand struggle. 
 
 We may, therefore, say that knowledge of the world 
 comes through the senses and a remembered picture or 
 image is the recollected reports of the senses in certain 
 combinations. Now it has been discovered that some 
 people — in fact, most people — ^have one sense developed 
 above the others and possibly another one hardly devel- 
 oped at all. They, after an experience, such as the wit- 
 nessing of a boat race, might get clear eye impressions 
 while they respond but poorly to auditory impressions 
 and therefore have but hazy recollections of sounds. An 
 eye-minded person trying to describe the boat race would 
 report the impressions of the color of the river, the green 
 
164 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 banks, the shining racing shells, the eight oars resting 
 on the out-riggers, the sun striking the bare shoulders 
 of the muscular rowers, the blue shirts of one crew and 
 the red of the other, and all along the course, he would 
 see again the hundreds of small boats and the many peo- 
 ple with their riot of vari-colored flags. But an ear- 
 minded person would recall the roar of the crowd, the 
 short, barking yells of small groups of students, the 
 crack of the starting gun, and the swish of the oars as 
 they feathered over the little waves. 
 
 It is highly desirable that a speaker should develop all 
 his senses to an excellent state of keenness. He should 
 see well and retain in his mind all his visual impressions ; 
 he should hear distinctly and have clear auditory images 
 or remembrances; he should distinguish smells, tastes, 
 and degrees of temperature as well as retain impressions 
 of motion and muscular effort. Only by developing all 
 the senses so as to get good, clear, and deep impressions 
 from them can the speaker hope to stock his mind wdth 
 complete and trustworthy pictures. One who has such a 
 stock to draw upon is said to possess a good imagination. 
 It is from such a stock that the poets, dramatists, and 
 novelists draw. The speaker or orator must also have 
 such a source of material. 
 
 Such a perfection of imagination is necessary to the 
 speaker, not only that the pictures for his own mental 
 use may be complete, but also that he may reach all his 
 hearers when he wishes to treat a concrete situation. If 
 his images were one-sided, all addressed to the ear, the 
 eye-minded auditors would get little from them. Lan- 
 guage expressing most perfect images of sight and smell 
 has no meaning or but a very hazy, general meaning to 
 an auditor who is almost entirely ear-minded. There- 
 fore, since people are strong in one sense and weak in 
 another, the orator must assail them through the chan- 
 
IMAGES 
 
 165 
 
 nels of all the senses. The greatest orators have the 
 rounded development which makes their messages have 
 meaning and force to all classes of people. Naturally, 
 some pictures are distinctly for the eye while others are 
 essentially symphonies of sound. The most skilled 
 speaker brings out all that can be brought out in each 
 situation. Where it suits his purpose to emphasize one 
 or another aspect, he is equipped to do so. 
 
 Carefully read the illustrations of this lesson and note, 
 in a table such as the following, the nature and number of 
 sense impressions in each passage quoted. 
 
 
 Everett 
 
 Hugo 
 
 Webster 
 
 Clay 
 
 Ingersoll 
 
 ~ Sight Images 
 
 - Sound " 
 
 - Taste " 
 
 Motion " ' 
 
 Temperature 
 
 *-Smell. . . . 
 
 y 
 
 
 ^^ 
 
 \~ 
 
 '^^' 
 
 'Touch 
 
 Effort 
 
 
 
 
 The test is to read carefully and try to see which of 
 your own senses is stimulated to reaction. Do you see 
 with your '' mind's eye," do you seem to hear a roar, do 
 you feel the effort or strain of conflict, etc. % 
 
 Now examine yourself and see if you are weak in re- 
 membering some of the sense aspects of some of your 
 own, original experiences. Go to your business some 
 morning a half hour earlier than the opening time. As 
 soon as you arrive at the office, sit down and write as 
 full a report as you can of the impressions of your car 
 ride during the last five blocks of travel. Eead your re- 
 port and see if it overemphasizes the eye element or the 
 ear element. Notice, during the actual writing, if certain 
 things which your reason tells you must have been experi- 
 enced have grown hazy in detail or been forgotten. Have 
 
166 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 you failed to retain a picture of the woman opposite you 
 in the car — the color of her hat, dress, and shoes? On 
 the other hand, have you a clear realization of the sensa- 
 tion of motion or movement ? There is no doubt that you 
 will discover that you are weak in some respects and 
 strong in others. Then again you may have very clear 
 recollections of things but be unable to express them in 
 words. That is a language difficulty which we shall con- 
 sider in the next lesson. Just now we want to find out 
 which of your sense reports are weakest and least trust- 
 worthy, whether you can tell others about it or not. 
 
 From now on, make many observations of the kind jast 
 described and attend especially to the things which 
 should appeal to your weakest sense. That weak spot 
 nmst be built up by careful use. Just as one who begins 
 to play billiards is at first awkward and unskillful and 
 later acquires skill through use, so a sense may be 
 brought to a high point of discernment through constant 
 practice. After making your observations, try to repro- 
 duce them in words both orally and in writing. 
 
 Eeading books Avill do but little to develop your image- 
 making capacity in the places where it is weak. It may 
 add some individual pictures to your stock where the' 
 sense that appreciates them is strong. But literature 
 does not build up the weak sense, for the words of an 
 author who is creating an eye impression have no mean- 
 ing to one who is ear-minded and whose visual sense is 
 poor. The direct study of nature and man with your 
 own senses is the only foundation for image-making. Go 
 out into the fields and woods and observe with all the 
 senses, especially exercising those which self-examina- 
 tion has shown you are weak. In the city also, observe 
 streets and buildings, machines and men. Do not over- 
 look any detail. Crowd your mind with sense impres- 
 
IMAGES 167 
 
 sions. You will find the game of observation a fascinat- 
 ing one and new delights will be opened to you as your 
 weaker organs of perception are gradually strengthened 
 and bring new treasures to the mind. 
 
 In the next lesson Ave shall speak of the way in which 
 one maj" best express his images for the benefit of others, 
 but first the speaker must have images in his own mind. 
 That means accurate and deep sense impressions through 
 careful observation and the faithful retention of the 
 combined impressions as a whole picture or image. 
 There is no other way to develop the imagination. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 Tlie wiittcii cxiToises in this t-ntire lesson slioiil- lo 
 carefully \\ orked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 First Day. — You have read through the lesson. Study it care- 
 fully and try to answer the test questions which follow. 
 During another painstaking reading, try to bring to mind 
 clearly all the images, or pictures, which are in the illus- 
 trating passages. Notice that the best results are attained 
 when your ivliole attention is upon the picture and your 
 reading is slow enough to allow each part to form itself 
 fully. Rapid and careless delivery interferes with clear 
 imagination. 
 
 Second Day. — Write out the three concrete pictures, with all 
 details of sense appeal, in one of the following groups : 
 (a) " The setting of the sun fills one with a sense of quiet 
 majesty." 
 "Niagara plunges on, a never-dying source of 
 
 power." 
 "The capitol at Washington is like a white coronet 
 upon the brow of the nation." 
 (b) Describe the gathering of a crowd. 
 Describe a fire. 
 
 Picture some thrilling exploit in a very concrete 
 way. 
 
168 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Third Day. — Outline a speech on one of the following subjects, 
 making a picture the means of appeal : 
 
 (a) Better factory conditions for unskilled labor. Pic- 
 
 ture an individual worker in wretched surroundings. 
 
 (b) Floating hospitals for sick babies. Picture a suffer- 
 
 ing infant in a hot, crowded, squalid tenement. 
 
 (c) Railroad reform to benefit the farmer. Picture an 
 
 orchard with fruit rotting on the ground because 
 high rates and poor railroad service make it impos- 
 sible to market it. 
 
 (d) Any other subject which can be represented in ap- 
 
 peal by a vivid picture. 
 
 Fourth Dai/.— Develop orally one of the outlines of the third 
 day. Notice whether or not the image revives fully in your 
 mind. If it does not, your imagination needs further train- 
 ing through observation. Do you find the image clear but 
 experience difficulty in finding words to express it ade- 
 quately? In that case, either you are weak in vocabulary 
 or you have not planned the matter well. 
 
 Fifth Day. — During the first four days, be on the "look-out" 
 for a scene or event which is especially impressive and 
 worthy of expression to others. For this day 's work, care- 
 fully note down all the elements of sense impression it 
 liad — color, movement, sound, etc. Tabulate them all and 
 then write a r-omplete word-picture. (Append tlie tal)uhition 
 to the word-picture in your notebook.) 
 
 An expert speaker does not, as a rule, go through such a 
 laborious and painstaking preparation for his pictures, but 
 it is an exercise which will rapidly make its further use un- 
 necessary. 
 
 Additional Reminders 
 
 1. How is your breathing?" 
 
 2. Are you carrying yourself well? 
 
 3. Do you control your breath well during speaking? 
 
 4. Do you criticise and observe other speakers? 
 
 5. Are you keeping up the reflection hour? 
 
 6. Do you criticise your own speaking and keep notes 
 about it? 
 
 7. Are you observing irifh all your senses so to to fill your 
 mind with a wealth of images? 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 liis knowknlge of tlie ])rinoiph^s in this lesson. Tliey 
 are sufif/rstirr merely, dealinii' lar<rely witli the praetieal 
 applieation of the i)rineiples. and ar<' to lie placed in the 
 notehook for future reference. 
 
 J. Has the general mastery of speech-planning any value in 
 detail work? 
 
 2. What is meant by ** word-painting"? "Who is the best 
 word-painter you have ever heard? Who the best you have 
 read? 
 
 3. Why is a concrete picture stronger than an abstract state- 
 ment? Can an ignorant man usually grasp the concrete? 
 Does he have difficulty with the abstract? Would a highly- 
 educated man grasp both? Would he object to either? 
 
 4. What do we mean when we say that an image or picture 
 is "a combination of sensations"? 
 
 5. If a man were deaf from birth, what concrete experiences 
 would he fail to appreciate? If he were blind, what kind of 
 appeals would be lost upon him? 
 
 6. Are all normal people "in full possession of all their 
 senses"? What does the answer to this question suggest to 
 the speaker? 
 
 7. As you recollect an experience, which sense elements are 
 strongest ? Which weakest ? As you read or hear word-paint- 
 ings, which kind gets the best response from you? What use 
 of this self-analysis will you make as a speaker? 
 
 8. What are the uses of concrete images mentioned in this 
 lesson ? 
 
 9. Do you know why a concrete image will arouse strong 
 feelings when a clear statement in abstract form leaves the 
 audience cold? 
 
 10. What is an unfair use of a concrete image ? 
 
 169 
 
170 TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 1 1 . What examples of good word-painting can you recall 
 from 3^our reading? 
 
 12. Who was Victor Hugo? 
 
 13. What is a " sense impression ' ' ? 
 
 14. What is the best procedure to develop ability in image- 
 making? 
 
LESSON 10 
 the expression of images and vocabulary-building 
 
 1. The Expression of Images 
 
 Our last lesson introduced the subject of images, ex- 
 plaining their nature and use in public addresses and 
 outlining methods by which the student might stock his 
 mind with many complete and clear pictures. 
 
 (a) The Nature of Images 
 
 We may here add a word or two for the purpose of 
 removing some mistaken notions concerning image- 
 making, or imagination. Imagination is not a ''faculty" 
 or a special department of the mind, separated in some 
 mysterious way from another part called the "reason." 
 
 Indeed, the imagination is very closely related to rea- 
 son. Let us illustrate. Suppose you were trying to 
 reason out w^hich of two men would make the better 
 manager of a business. You would call up pictures of 
 each one in various activities and facing different prob- 
 lems. Then you would decide which set of impressions 
 was more favorable. Thus, to judge between two men — 
 to exercise reason, you first have to hold them clearly 
 in mind by an act of imagination. Just as every act 
 of reason carries with it some imagination, so also no 
 one could imagine, or revive, pictures unless he was able 
 to remember. You could not call up a picture of a pleas- 
 ant scene unless the mind had retained its impression. 
 The imagination, therefore, acts also hand in hand 
 
 171 
 
172 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 with memory. The man who has many experiences and 
 who can retain and recall them is likely to be equipped 
 to appreciate all future experiences the better and to 
 reason more clearly. Consequently, exercises in memory 
 and imagination are of practical benefit for the whole 
 intellectual development. 
 
 Not only must we avoid the fallacy of considering 
 imagination a separate and independent department of 
 the mind, but we must also refrain from confusing it with 
 one of its by-products — the fancy. Let us consider the 
 difference betw^een the broad term imagination and the 
 narrower expression fancy. When we say that a man 
 has a good imagination, we have used the wrong word 
 if we mean to convey the notion that he is a mere 
 romancer who pictures forth 'the impossible and unbe- 
 lievable. Imagination, for the most part, deals with what 
 is real ; it reproduces, for further inspection, real things 
 which were once seen or heard. There are three ways 
 in which the real experiences of life are revived in image 
 form by an act of imagination. 
 
 First, there is the simple revival, or calling to mind, 
 of a scene or transaction just as it originally took place. 
 One says, ''I can close my eyes and see the whole thing 
 over again." This is simple imagination, or reproduc- 
 tion. 
 
 Second, there is the reproduction of parts of different, 
 real experiences in new combinations and relationships. 
 Here we have creative imagination. It is what enables 
 an artist who has seen one girl with sparkling eyes, 
 another with a blooming complexion, and a third with a 
 crown of golden hair, to combine all tlie best features 
 of the various individuals in one picture of an "imag- 
 inary," ideal girl. Creative imagination lies behind 
 every invention, for the inventor imagines old things 
 in new combinations — new arrangements which will give 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 173 
 
 new benefits to man. The military strategist must imag- 
 ine his forces and those of the enemy in new positions. 
 The social reformer imagines the old elements of society 
 in new relations. In short; all progress depends on the 
 reasonable combination of existing tilings in new rela- 
 tionships through acts of creative imagination. 
 
 Third, past experiences or parts of experiences may be 
 revived in a whimsical rearrangement, so that the whole 
 reconstruction is ridiculous or impossible. This is the 
 amusing or freakish play of the imagination which we 
 call fancy. It uses real elements as its material but it 
 obeys no laws or probability in the new combinations it 
 produces. Here we have the fabulous creatures, half 
 man and half lion, the giants with eagle beaks, and all the 
 monsters and impossibilities of fairy tales. Often we 
 find the fancy playing an important part in humorous 
 addresses. The speaker provokes laughter by portray- 
 ing incongruous or ridiculously impossible situations. 
 Such a play of fancy, we note once more, is not to be con- 
 fused with the whole field of imagination. It is but a 
 small and relatively unimportant part of it. But all 
 forms of imaginative reconstruction rest upon initial 
 sense perception. We must make original observations. 
 We must come in touch with real life. Only in this way 
 can the mind be stored with a wealth of impressions 
 which may be recalled as a basis for new combinations.* 
 
 iQne might object to the statement that our imagination 
 must have real experiences to build upon, by saying that a 
 person can get pictures or images to draw upon simply by 
 reading many imaginative books ; that is, we can borrow from 
 the storehouse of the author. But what we read is only un- 
 derstood in so far as what we read comes within the limits of 
 what wf- have lived through. We can understand the novel com- 
 binations of a writer only if we have an experience-basis 
 which puts us in first-hand possession of the elements he uses 
 in fictitious combinations. It is well to read these books, but 
 there must be parallel observation and concrete experience. 
 
174 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (6) Planning for Image Expression 
 
 Lesson 9 gave exercises to insure the existence of 
 images in the mind and only incidentally called for any 
 expression of the images. This lesson will pay particu- 
 lar attention to the problem of expression. Granted that 
 you have the pictures in mind, how will you make them 
 clear to the audience 1 Your first problem will be one of 
 planning and your second will be the selection of words. 
 This last leads us to the field of vocabulary-building. 
 
 We all know that a mountain viewed from a distance 
 of twenty miles makes a picture quite different from one 
 seen while standing at its base. There is a difference in 
 outline. There is also a great difference in color and de- 
 tail. A mountain from a great distance is a uniform 
 gray or green, let us say. Near by we see patches of bril- 
 liant green, earth color, and rock. Furthermore, great 
 masses which constitute the perceptible details in the 
 distant view are not seen at all as units when a person 
 stands at the very foot of the ascending path. Conse- 
 quently, in presenting an image to others, the first thing 
 to establish is the point of view. This viewpoint governs 
 the general outline and the refinement of details. 
 
 1. The Vieivpoint. — In the following passage from 
 Edward Everett's Three Pictures of Boston, observe the 
 manner in which he establishes the viewpoint and con- 
 sider how much he would lose in effectiveness if this ele- 
 ment were omitted. 
 
 To understand the character of the commerce of our own 
 city, we must not look merely at one point, but at the whole 
 circuit of country of which it is the business center. We must 
 not contemplate it only at this present moment of time, but 
 we must bring before our imaginations, as in the shifting 
 scenes of a diorama, at least three successive historical and 
 topographical pictures; and truly instructive I think it would 
 be to see them delineated on canvas. We must survev the 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 175 
 
 first of them in the company of the venerable John Win- 
 throp, founder of the state. Let us go up with him on the 
 day of his landing, the seventeenth of June, 1630, to the 
 heights of yonder peninsula, as yet without a name. Landw^ard 
 stretches a dismal forest; seaward, a waste of waters, un- 
 spotted with a sail, except that of his own ship. At the foot 
 of the hill, you see the cabins of Walford and the Spragues, 
 who — the latter the year before, the former still earlier — had 
 adventured to this spot, untenanted else by any child of civi- 
 lization. On the other side of the river lies Mr.. Blackstone's 
 farm. It comprises three goodly, hills, converted by a spring- 
 tide into three wood-crowned islets ; and it is mainly valued 
 for a noble spring of fresh water, which gushes from the 
 northern slope of one of these hills, and which furnished, in the 
 course of the summer, the motive for transferring the seat 
 of the infant settlement. This shall be the first picture. 
 
 The second shall be contemplated from the same spot — the 
 heights of Charlestown — on the same day, the eventful seven- 
 teenth of June, one hundred and forty years later, namely, in 
 the year 1775. A terrific scene of war wages on the top of 
 the hill. Wait for a favorable moment, when the volumes of 
 fiery smoke roll away, and over the masts of the sixty-gun 
 ship, whose batteries are blazing upon the hill, you behold 
 Mr. Blackstone's farm changed to an ill-built town of about 
 two thousand dwelling houses, mostly of wood; with scarce 
 any public buildings, but eight or nine churches, the old State 
 House and Faneuil Hall ; Roxbury beyond, an insignificant 
 village ; a vacant marsh in all the space now occupied by Cam- 
 bridgeport, East Cambridge, Chelsea and East Boston; and be- 
 neath your feet the town of Charlestown — consisting in the 
 morning of a line of about three hundred houses, wrapped in 
 a sheet of flame at noon, and reduced at eventide to a heap 
 of ashes. 
 
 But those fires are kindled upon the altar of liberty. Ameri- 
 can independence is established. American Commerce smiles 
 on the spot ; and now from the top of one of Mr. Blackstone 's 
 hills, a stately edifice arises which seems to invite us as to 
 an observatory. As we look down from this lofty structure, 
 we behold the third picture — a crowded, busy scene. We see 
 beneath us a city containing eighty or ninety thousand in- 
 habitants, and mainly built of brick and granite. Vessels of 
 every description are moored at the wharves. 
 
 Notice how Everett changed his point of view from the 
 hill at Charlesto\^m to Boston State House, when he 
 
176 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 wished to get a nearer view of the streets of the modern 
 city. Observe how he made his picture up of large 
 masses when he had the far view. Turn back to page 158 
 of Lesson 9 to note how Webster went into very full and 
 minute details when he described the battle on that same 
 hill. His is a near point of view^n the midst of the 
 fray. 
 
 After fixing your point of view, have the details scaled 
 in conformity to it. 
 
 2. Adapt the Details to iue Particular Audience. — 
 Always keep your whole image and the parts which go to 
 make it up well within the grasp of your audience. It 
 would be altogether unreasonable to expect a group of 
 untraveled farmers in New England or tbe Middle West 
 to realize a vision of the great Woolworth Building in 
 New York City, by merely saying, "There was the ma- 
 jestic, wlute building, fifty stories high, rising above the 
 surrounding structures." The past experience of such 
 men furnishes them with no recollections which will fill 
 out or enable them to appreciate the picture. Such an 
 audience must be approached so that the new can be 
 placed in relation to the old. The new must be brought 
 within their grasp. Say to them, "Think of your town 
 hall — a fine stone building four stories high. Suppose 
 that you were standing on the other side of the street 
 looking at it. Imagine that four more stories are added 
 to it so that you have to raise your eyes more to see the 
 edge of the roof. Now double this eight story building 
 so that you have to tilt your head back to see the win- 
 dows of the sixteenth floor. If by some magic, such a 
 building, snow white and capped with a pyramid, could 
 shoot up to yet again three times its height, so that you 
 would have to strain far back to get a glimpse of the 
 sky beyond its crest, you would be in much the position 
 of one who views the Woolworth Building from the other 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 177 
 
 side of the street." Further impressive and important 
 points in the picture could be made clear in a similar 
 manner. The speaker must take the hints whicii are in 
 the very atmosphere during his speech and must use his 
 judgment in his adaptation to a particular audience. 
 
 3. Order of Details. — The rules laid down in the 
 earlier lessons (see particularly Lesson 4) concerning 
 the sequence of subdivisions of an entire speech apply 
 also to the order of details in presenting a picture. This 
 is true for descriptive image work or for narratives. 
 Just as a general plan may be announced for a speech, 
 so also a comprehensive outline of a picture may be given 
 to promote clearness. Observe once more how "Webster, 
 in his picture of the Battle of Bunl^er Hill (Lesson 9, 
 page 158), gives a comprehensive outline after he estab- 
 lishes his viewpoint. His general outline makes it clear 
 that instead of painting the scene as it now is, he will 
 present it as it was then. The particulars then follow. 
 
 In narrative work, we call the general outline by an- 
 other name — the forecast of the whole plot. To fore- 
 cast what is to happen, of course, promotes clearness, for 
 the audience stands ready to fit each detail into its proper 
 place as it comes along. The one drawback is that the 
 possibility of excitement and surprise is likely to be di- 
 minished by such a forecast. 
 
 As in the case of the whole speech, the details of a par- 
 ticular picture must be arranged according to an orderly 
 plan based on considerations such as time, place, magni- 
 tude, or cause and effect. (For a simpler explanation of 
 this, refer to Lesson 5.) 
 
 4. Degree of Refinement.— 1%\^ is a consideration 
 which arises especially in connection with the details of 
 an image. It embraces all those things which a speaker 
 will have in mind when he decides to cease giving further 
 details. It must have become evident to the student by 
 
178 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 now that a subdivision of a whole speech will itself have 
 further subdivisions or details of its o-^vn ; while these, in 
 turn, may have more minute items of amplification, and 
 so on do^\^l the scale until individual words are reached. 
 The practical problem is to determine the degree of this 
 refinement. Just where should a speaker stop and re- 
 frain from giving further details? The general rule 
 should be, ''Stop as soon as further particulars will dis- 
 tract the attention from the whole impression you wish 
 to leave." 
 
 For instance, if you give a picture such as Ingersoll's 
 French peasant (Lesson 9, page 162), your whole pur- 
 pose is to contrast the love and contentment of the 
 French peasant with the restless coldness of Napoleon's 
 life. Obviously, certain things about the peasant were 
 better unsaid, for, although true, they would take the at- 
 tention from the essential contrast. You omit, therefore, 
 a description of the features of a particular peasant's 
 face, his likes and dislikes, his food, and the cut of his 
 jacket. Your purpose is to make a certain contrast, and 
 you give no details beyond those essential to that aim. 
 
 If, on the other hand, you should msh to make a hu- 
 morous sketch of a French peasant, you would create fun 
 by going into all the minutiae of his rustic awkwardness. 
 You would delineate every wrinkle in his weather-beaten 
 face, every trick of the shrewd eye, every act at the table, 
 even down to the skillful use of the knife to transfer 
 mashed potatoes to his mouth without the loss of blood. 
 
 Experience will tell when not to amplify further. 
 Sometimes a boldly sketched, fleeting image is all that is 
 wanted and a more carefully dra^\^l picture will delay or 
 destroy results. The ideal is to stop treating an image 
 when it has made its maximum impression for the pur- 
 pose for which it is used. Further time on it has the 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 179 
 
 blurring effect of over-exposure to a photographic plate. 
 We want no fogged impressions. 
 
 The following image work is from Beecher's lecture on 
 Gambling and is the third of four scenes in the down- 
 ward path of the gambler. Notice how the point of view 
 is established and tlie general plan is sketched in the 
 first four lines. Then observe that the characters at the 
 card table are delineated in detail sufficient only to give 
 the impression of a nondescript, repulsive group in 
 wretched surroundings. 
 
 Go with me to that dilapidated house not far from the land- 
 ing in New Orleans. Look into the dirty room. Around a 
 broken table, sitting on boxes, kegs and rickety chairs, see a 
 filthy crew dealing cards smouched with tobacco, grease and 
 liquor. One has a pirate face, burnished and burnt with 
 brandy; a shock of grizzly, matted hair, half covering his vil- 
 lian eyes, which glare out like a wild beast's from a thicket. 
 Close behind him wheezes a white-faced, dropsical wretch, ver- 
 min covered and stenchful. A scoundrel Spaniard and a burly 
 negro (the jolliest of the four) complete the group. They 
 have spectators, drunken sailors and oggling, thieving, drink- 
 ing women, who should have died long ago when all that was 
 womanly died. Here, hour draws on hour, sometimes with 
 brutal laughter, sometimes with threat and oath and uproar. 
 The last few, stolen dollars lost, the temper also — each charges 
 each with cheating. High words ensue, and blows, and then 
 the whole gang burst out the door, beating, biting, scratching 
 and rolling over and over in the dirt and dust. The worst, 
 the fiercest and the drunkenest of the four is our friend who 
 began by making up the game. 
 
 This illustration reminds us of another matter related 
 to details. When you wish to pause, to hold up the move- 
 ment, and to appreciate some scene fully, give a wealth 
 of minutisp; but if you wish rapid movement, details 
 must be suppressed. To accelerate the movement, give 
 fewer and fewer details ; secure effects by broad strokes 
 and make a bold climax. Observe how Beecher pictured 
 the people at the card table and how he hastened the 
 
180 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 movement after the quarrel began. From that point on 
 he ceased to consider individuals but, with a few quick 
 flashes or impressions, treated them all as a mob. 
 
 (c) Images by Suggestion 
 
 For every carefully worked-out image in a public 
 speech, there are usually about ten which are suggested 
 by single words or by brief expressions of two or three 
 words. The skillful speaker has acquired the knack of 
 revealing a whole picture by a short expression hitting 
 off some outstanding feature. Kead the following para- 
 graph from James G. Blaine's memorial address on Gar- 
 field. 
 
 As the end drew near, his early craving for the sea re- 
 turned. The stately mansion of power had been to him the 
 wearisome hospital of pain, and he begged to be taken from 
 its prison-walls, from its oppressive, stifling air, from its home- 
 lessness and its hopelessness. Gently, silently, the love of a 
 great people bore the pale sufferer to the longed-for healing of 
 the sea, to live or die as God should will, within sight of its 
 heaving billows, within sound of its manifold voices. With 
 wan, fevered face tenderly lifted to the cooling breeze, he 
 looked out wistfully upon the ocean's changing wonders — on 
 its far sails whitening in the morning light; on its restless 
 waves rolling shoreward to break and die beneath the noon- 
 day sun ; on the red clouds of evening arching low to the hori- 
 zon; on the serene and shining pathway of the stars. Let us 
 think that his dying eyes read a mystic meaning which only the 
 rapt and parting soul may know. Let us believe that in the 
 silence of the receding world he heard the great waves break- 
 ing on a farther shore, and felt already upon his wasted brow 
 the breath of the eternal morning. 
 
 Here Ave see a whole series of pictures, each suggested 
 just by a touch. Notice especially the effect of *'on its 
 far sails whitening in the morning light." Does not the 
 complete picture arise as clearly as it would had the ora- 
 tor carefully outlined the whole and filled in the details? 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 181 
 
 While speaking of the Union soldiers in his Reunion 
 Speech at Indianapolis, Robert G. Ingersoll said : ''We 
 stand guard with them in the wild storm and under the 
 quiet stars." Does not a picture of the sentry, out be- 
 yond the lines, with the starry sky above him, come fully 
 to mind — invoked by a word ? 
 
 (d) Practice in Suggestive Use of Words 
 
 How shall the student acquire skill in using words ef- 
 fectively and economically? By first trying to grasp the 
 most essential part of a scene or situation and then usin.u 
 the word which designates that very characteristic part. 
 For instance, the striking thing about a sailboat on the 
 horizon is the white flash of the sail as it swings around 
 and catches the full beam of the sun. The most serene 
 and quieting thing at night, when one is alone, is the 
 glittering star. The effective use of words to give whole 
 pictures arises when one sees into the very heart of the 
 picture and reveals that only. That essential part car- 
 ries all the rest with it to the audience. 
 
 Let the student tell the essential thing, physical or 
 spiritual, in the following : 
 
 1. Cattle at noon under the trees. 
 
 2. A dreadnaught battleship coming head on at 
 
 full speed. 
 
 3. A fast torpedo boat in the same action. 
 
 4. A workman entering the room to tell his wife 
 
 that he has been laid off. 
 
 5. The sea on a clear night under a full moon. 
 
 6. A lake or river under the same circumstances. 
 
 7. A laborer opening a great furnace door in a 
 
 steel mill to rake the coals. 
 
 8. A man whom you admire, in a characteristic 
 
 attitude. 
 
182 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 9.- The same for a man against whom you have a 
 justifiable aversion. 
 10. A drunkard staggering along the street. 
 
 The student should have a notebook in which to make 
 studies suggested by these exercises. Whenever a good 
 or interesting thing is met "hit it off" in the most con- 
 cise Avay possible. Then also work out the detailed and 
 thoroughly planned description or narrative. Whenever 
 you get a very apt expression in your reading, make a 
 note of it. 
 
 There are those who recommend that the student of 
 speaking have many such pet expressions memorized 
 and ready to draw upon when getting up a speech of his 
 own. The keeping of a notebook, however, is not val- 
 uable so much for this reason, but rather because the 
 process of culling out effective expressions and of record- 
 ing these, as well as original ones, will tend to develop 
 observation and expression. What we want to cultivate 
 in the speaker is the keen eye and the ready tongue which 
 will work together extemporaneously. If, however, you 
 find that the store of "canned" gems is of real help, it 
 would be foolish to set it aside. On the other hand, do 
 not use it to the exclusion of extemporaneous expression. 
 
 2. VOCABULAEY-BUILDING 
 
 The expression of images and especially the sketchy 
 use of one or two words to suggest a whole scene implies 
 a mastery of words. We shall consider, in the rest of 
 this lesson, the general principles of vocabulary-build- 
 ing. The next lesson will be devoted entirely to a system 
 of word-analysis and synthesis. 
 
 As would naturally be expected, writers from the 
 earliest times have pointed out the need of a large vo- 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 18;j 
 
 cabulary for the speaker. Quintilian, the great Roman 
 rhetorician, gives over the first chapter of his tenth book 
 to this subject, under the title De Copia Verhorum {On 
 the Supply of Words). In stating the ideal to be at- 
 tained here, we may say that three things should char- 
 acterize the vocabulary of a successful speaker : (1) It 
 should be large; (2) it should be accurate; and (3) it 
 should be readily accessible. This last characteristic is 
 more essential to the speaker than to the writer. The 
 other two hold for the essayist as well as for the orator. 
 
 (a) Enlarging the Vocabulary 
 
 Nature provides that as a child matures, he shall fix 
 to the various experiences in life the words which those 
 around him usually employ to represent those experi- 
 ences. As the mother comes near the infant, she con- 
 stantly refers to herself as ' ' mother " or ' ' mamma. ' ' At 
 last, the child associates the two and the word will re- 
 call the person to his mind, or the presence or recollec- 
 tion of the mother will prompt the use of the word. 
 
 So on through life; wider knowledge brings mth it 
 wider language for expressional purposes. There is no 
 other way to enlarge the vocabulary. To be sure, by a 
 sheer feat of the memory one might acquire a parrot 
 control over a great list of words, but they will have no 
 expressional value unless they come with an intimate 
 knowledge of the things for which they stand. Conse- 
 quently, we would advise that the student study not only 
 the word but also the thing. If you hear or come across 
 a strange word, look it up not only in the dictionary but 
 also in the encyclopaedia, Establisli a memory of the 
 word itself and also a trustworthy knowledge of the 
 thing it expresses. The word then becomes alive; it is 
 
184 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 not a dead and empty shell, increase your stock of live 
 
 WORDS. 
 
 The second care of the speaker is to observe carefully 
 the context in which his words are met. A word used in 
 one group may be different in meaning from the same 
 word used in another connection. Furthermore, two 
 words may have almost the same meaning — they may be 
 almost synonymous, but a certain context may call for 
 one of them and make the use of the other incorrect. 
 Consequently, one who would acquire a just sense of the 
 meaning of words should read widely and hear many ex- 
 cellent speeches. The only way to appreciate the exact 
 shades of meaning connected with a given word is to hear 
 it used in a general setting and to hear it often. To illus- 
 ^'trate how one context calls for one word and another for 
 \ a different word, we can tell the old story about surprise 
 ) and astonish. It is said that on coming do\\Ti stairs un- 
 expectedly one day, Noah Webster's wife caught him 
 when about to kiss the maid. "AVhy, Noah," she ex- 
 claimed, ''I'm surprised!" He replied, ''You are mis- 
 taken, my dear, it is I who am surprised ; you are aston- 
 ished." 
 
 Take the word liable. Many people use it interchange- 
 ably with apt or likely. Even Dr. Buckley, in his Ex- 
 temporaneous Oratory, in the chapter on "Words 
 and Their Proper Use," says: "A vocabulary of a 
 thousand words, correctly understood, is preferable to 
 one of five thousand, even though four-fifths of them are 
 properly used, if a part be misconceived. Many have no 
 power of intelligent selection, frequently using words 
 correctly, and by means of them truly expressing thv^ir 
 thoughts and feelings ; but having grasped many words 
 incorrectly, they are liable at any moment to fall into er- 
 ror." His thought here is commendable, but not his use 
 of the word liable to mean apt, prone, or likely. The 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 185 
 
 word properly means open to responsibility or subject 
 to. Tims, in context we should find: "If your factory 
 is not in sanitary condition, you are liable to prosecution 
 and fine" or ''I hold you liable for this debt." 
 
 These two illustrations will indicate the value of con- 
 text in fixing meaning. It is not safe merely to consult a 
 dictionary. Some of the larger dictionaries are fairly 
 good, for they give the usual definitions and synonyms 
 and also a few illustrations to show the w^ord in context. 
 They are desirable and, to a certain extent, meet our 
 needs, but the smaller dictionaries, which give defini- 
 tions only, cannot be depended upon for much help. If 
 the student wishes to see the relation of the illustrations 
 to the definitions, let him look up the words restive and 
 transpire and then determine the exact meaning of the 
 following expressions: ''There was the restive steed" 
 and "After these things transpired, his conduct 
 changed." 
 
 To supplement the observation of words in connection 
 with real experience or in connection with the context of 
 other speakers and writers, the student may take up a 
 systematic study of word lists, sjmomans, antonyms, and 
 dictionaries. This is reversing the process from natural 
 use to word-study by making word-study precede use in 
 communication. In the next lesson we shall outline a 
 scientific method of word-study. Now, however, we shall 
 assume that the words are first met in (1) conversation, 
 (2) public address, or (3) reading, and that you expect 
 to use the dictionary as a check only. The following is a 
 good daily program. 
 
 {b) Vocabulary -Building from Context 
 
 1. Set aside a portion of the day or evening for good, 
 systematic reading. We may suggest the best way to be- 
 
186 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 gin the best kinds of reading. We do not expect the 
 student to read all the following books, but we strongly 
 urge him to begin with those listed first. They are easy 
 and very interesting. 
 
 (a) Biography: Begin with Benjamin Franklin's 
 Autobiography and the Life of Benvenuto Cellini (a most 
 absorbing narrative, translated into English by Sy- 
 monds). These will interest you in biography. Then 
 read Carl Schurz's Life of Henry Clay, Boswell's John- 
 son, and the lives of other men in fields of work in which 
 you are interested. 
 
 (b) Good Oratory: The order of interest is Robert 
 Ingersoll, Wendell Phillips, Webster, Burke, and others. 
 Webster uses words most carefully and so does Burke, 
 but they are apt to be a bit ponderous at times. Inger- 
 soll and Phillips are both good and interesting. There 
 are many satisfactory collections of orations which may 
 be read for choice extracts from these and other orators. 
 
 (c) Good Fiction: For interest in excellent writing, 
 begin with Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter. Follow it with 
 Edgar Allen Poe's Short Stories and the works of Rob- 
 ert Louis Stevenson, Kipling, Dickens, Thackeray, and 
 George Eliot. 
 
 (d) Plays: Begin to read George Bernard Shaw's 
 The Doctor's Dilemma, Getting Married, and Fanny's 
 First Play. Then read his plays Pleasant and Unpleas- 
 ant. J. M. Barrie {Peter Pan) and Maeterlink {The Blue 
 Bird) and other modern dramatists may interest you and 
 prepare you for an appreciation of Ibsen {The Doll's 
 House, The Master Builder, Pillars of' Society, and 
 Hedda Gabler). These should be read before the plays 
 of Shakespeare. Of course, everyone should read these 
 last eventually. 
 
 (e) Poetry: The following sequence is recommended 
 for those who do not already care for poetry but who 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 187 
 
 wish to have a taste for it developed: Scott {The Lady 
 of the Lake, Marmion, The Lay of the Last Minstrel) ; 
 Coleridge {The Ancient Mariner) ; AVilde {The Ballad of 
 Reading Gaol) ; Poe {The Raven and Annabel Lee) ; 
 Longfellow {Evangeline) ; Tennyson {Enoch Arden, The 
 Round Table Poems, Break, Break, Break, and In Memo- 
 riani). Then may follow readings in Palgrave's Golden 
 Treasury of English Verse, selecting Browning, Shelley, 
 and Keats. When the student loves Shelley, he loves 
 poetry. 
 
 2. During this reading and during all other incidental 
 reading, such as the daily perusal of the newspapers and 
 magazines, make a note of new words in a little book. 
 Also, copy longer expressions which are either new or 
 especially effective. Be sure to master the context in 
 every case- 
 
 3. ^ Note in a similar manner new or excellent expres- 
 sions heard in conversation or while list^.'ning to public 
 addresses. 
 
 4. Consult the dictionary and check up the meaning of 
 all these words. 
 
 5. Put them to the test of comparison and contrast. 
 The method is as follows : Write down the word in ques- 
 tion and then write as many words as you know which 
 stand for the same or nearly the same idea (synonjans) ; 
 next, add all you know which are of opposite meaning 
 (antonyms). After that, indicate fine distinctions. The 
 exercise about to be given is a very complete treatment 
 of the word discord. We do not expect a student to do so 
 well. If he has two "like" words and two "opposite" 
 words and one "distinction," he has enough for a be- 
 ginner. 
 
 A good book to consult in connection with this exercise 
 "is Roget's Thesaurus, a Treasury of the English Words. 
 
188 
 
 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Word 
 
 Like 
 
 Opposite 
 
 Distinction 
 
 Discord 
 
 Jarring note, 
 trouble, disagree- 
 ment, dissension, 
 cross- purpose, 
 breach, wrangling, 
 row, rumpus, Don- 
 nybrook Fair 
 
 Concord, h a r - 
 mony, sympathy, 
 agreement, peace, 
 reciprocity, concili- 
 ation 
 
 We speak of discord 
 when a slight lack of 
 harmony exists; but 
 breach indicates a 
 more serious separa- 
 tion of interests. We 
 have concord when all 
 work well together; 
 concihation exists if 
 that harmony was pre- 
 ceded by dissension. 
 Concihation also im- 
 pUes that the parties 
 involved have secured 
 the harmony by mu- 
 tual concessions 
 
 6. As words are mastered, put them into actual oral 
 and written use. 
 
 7. Practice the following substitution-of-missing-ex- 
 pression exercises: 
 
 (a) Take a magazine article or other piece of compo- 
 sition which you are willing to mutilate, and strike out 
 certain words and phrases. Note how it is done in the 
 following passage from an address on "Jesus as a Pub- 
 lic Speaker," 
 
 Now, Jesus of Nazareth is the greatest name in history. 
 He has wielded an influence greater than any king, ppinoo 
 or wappiop. Was He an orator ? 
 
 One of the first roquiaitoo - of the orator is that he be a 
 well-informed popoon. He must know muoh of many thingo. 
 Particularly is it doairablo that he know and love * %otm' <»r or, 
 at least, have muoh of the po tic tompopamont. Moreover, 
 he must be a lioot> student of liiman nature. Do the Gospels 
 ascribe any or all of these attributes to Jesus? So precocious 
 was He that at the age of twelve He astonished the dootoru ' 
 of the temple. His uttei-ances at thirty, when He met in 
 
t 
 
 IMAGES AND VOCABULARY-BUILDING 189 
 
 keen nrgumont - priest, scribe, pharisee and lawyer, show Him 
 to have been master of the law. Can there be any doubt of 
 Ilis knowledge of and lovo for nature ? "I am the vine ; ye 
 are the branches." **A soAver went forth to sow." ''Do men 
 gather grapes of thorns or figs or thistles?" "Behold the 
 fowlci of the air, for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor 
 gather into bapno ; yet your heavenly f::tihoi' feedeth them." 
 ' ' Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow ; they toil not 
 neither do they spin; and yet I say unto you, that even 
 Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 
 Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, w^hich 
 today is, and tomorrow is cast into the oven, shall He not 
 much more clothe you, ye of little faith ? ' ' 
 
 Of course, you must obliterate the deleted expressions 
 completely. Set aside a number of such prepared pas- 
 sages until you have forgotten the words you crossed out. 
 Then take the sheet and read it through smoothly, sup- 
 plying at each gap, without hesitancy, an expression 
 which will be appropriate. You have tlie general pur- 
 pose and aim of the passage to guide you, but you must 
 supply, on the spur of the moment, a word which will 
 continue the sense. 
 
 This is an exercise in adaptation and application but 
 not one in acquisition. It is very valuable, for it dupli- 
 cates almost exactly the situation in which a speaker 
 finds himself when he tries to express, in an extempora- 
 neous manner, a thought which he understands and has 
 fully in mind. He must find adequate words promptly. 
 
 (b) Next make a list of words on which you wish to 
 practice. Then, in a rapid and extemporaneous manner 
 supply a number of s\Tionyms and antonyms ; draw dis- 
 tinctions. It is the rapid and oral carrying-out of what 
 was suggested on page 187 as a written means of acquisi- 
 
190 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 tion. The following is a typical list with the first word 
 treated in the desired manner. 
 
 1. Relation, Relation is similar to con- 
 nection, the opposite of dissociation or differ- 
 ence; we may say that relation exists without 
 implying that there is harmony, for harmony 
 is only one kind of relation possible between 
 two or more things. 
 
 2. Symmetry 
 
 3. Domain 
 
 4. Regularity 
 
 5. Individuality 
 
 6. Eternity 
 
 7. Intelligence 
 
 8. Safety 
 
 9. Defiance 
 10. Amusement. 
 
 Take such a list and go through it rapidly. If you have 
 to pause and cannot promptly add the required amplifica- 
 tion, check the word and move immediately to the next 
 one. There must be no stop. After you are through go 
 back and make a careful study of the words you had to 
 check. Then add them to a new list to be used for exer- 
 cise at some other time. After a while, you will have 
 compiled a great many lists and have a considerable ad- 
 dition to your readily accessible vocabulary. 
 
 Thus, we have outlined the manner in which to make 
 all words with which you come in contact as living parts 
 of expression, a part of your own vocabulary. We have 
 outlined the way to check up their meaning, to study 
 them, and to exercise with them in actual application. 
 
 In the next lesson, we shall consider word-building so 
 as to indicate how the mastery of a comparatively small 
 number of root words and parts of words will give you 
 command over a much vaster vocabularv. 
 
IMAGES AND VOCABITLARY-BUTLDTNG 191 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exorcises in tliis entire lesson shonld bo 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Copy from some oration or writing a description 
 which you consider very good. Then make an analysis of 
 it, covering the following points : 
 
 1. Topic 
 
 2. Point of view 
 
 3. Comprehensive outline 
 
 4. Plan or basis of ordering details 
 
 5. Use of words 
 
 Second Day. — Make a similar study of a good piece of narra- 
 tive work. 
 
 Third Day. — Write out an original piece of description or nar- 
 ration, following an outline covering these points, and at- 
 taching the outline to your work. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Make an outline of this character for five or six 
 images and develop them extemporaneously. This is a most 
 important exercise. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Prepare a list of fifty short expressions which are 
 good and expressive by suggestion. Add twenty-five of 
 your own. 
 
 Additional Reminders 
 
 1. Is your posture good? 
 
 Are you improving in breath capacity and control? 
 
 3. Are you carefully criticizing your own organization of 
 thought in your conversations and public addresses? 
 
 4. Are you systematically criticizing others? 
 
 5. Have you found any one-sided development in your 
 perception and memory, that is, are you distinctly eye-minded 
 or ear-minded or motor-minded? What are you doing about it? 
 
 6. Be sure to work steadily to increase your vocabulary. 
 
hi 
 
 TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for tlie stiulont tn ust" in testing 
 iiis knowledge of the principles in tliis lesson. They 
 are sugfiestiue merely, dealing largely witli the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to he placed in the 
 notebook for futnie reference. 
 
 1. Does your own life show that there is a close relation be- 
 tween actual experience and imagination; Along what lii;,^ 
 does your imagination work? 
 
 2. Why are self-made men very often successful business 
 executives, promoters, and advertisers? 
 
 3. What man of your acquaintance has the best reproduc- 
 ing imagination? Who the best creative imagination? Who 
 the best fancy? Has the mental characteristic of each any 
 connection with the work in which he is engaged? 
 
 4. What is meant by adaptation to the audience? Did you 
 ever see a speaker fail because of weakness in this respect? 
 
 5. Have you ever heard a man spoil a description oi" nar- 
 rative because of unorganized or poorly ordered details? 
 
 G. What is the effect upon an audience of over-refinement 
 and too much detail? 
 
 7. Will you not add to the list of subjects for word-paint- 
 ing on page 181 to be expressed by a few suggestive words? 
 What kind of images comes most readily to your mind? 
 
 8. What are the natural principles governing the enlarge- 
 ment of a vocabulary? 
 
 9. What do we mean by "increasing the stock of live 
 words ' ' ? 
 
 10. Why is context of great importance? 
 
 11. Which of your favorite authors has the largest vocabii- 
 lary? Which one uses his words most accurately? 
 
 12. Could you improve upon our plan of vocabuhrry-build- 
 ing? How? Can you suggest other interesting and effective 
 devices to fix the words and to give rapid command in speech ? 
 
 192 
 
LESSON 11 
 vocabulary-building 
 
 1. Word Analysis 
 
 In the last lesson, we gave exercises designed to culti- 
 vate in the student exactness in the use of each word 
 added to his vocabulary. Exercises to insure facility or 
 prompt selection of the proper word at a given place 
 were also outlined. Finally, both precision and prompt- 
 ness were re-enforced by practice on synonyms and an- 
 ton^ans. If a student were to read a great deal, note each 
 new expression, find all its synon3ans and antonjans, and 
 then practice with his enlarged vocabulary after the man- 
 ner suggested in Lesson 10, he would soon have easy 
 command of wide language resources. But there is an- 
 other way to supplement the process as described so that 
 still greater returns may be reaped from a given amount 
 of effort. Such a further study — Avord analysis, as we 
 shall call it — we shall take up in this lesson. If one can 
 analyze properly a given number of words over which 
 he has complete command, he will thereby be given in- 
 sight into the meaning of two or three times as many 
 more. Furthermore, word analysis will make the con- 
 sultation of the dictionary a real pleasure and that dry 
 book will become attractive. 
 
 No doubt every student has noticed that certain of our 
 words are similar in some of their parts; for instance, 
 toiQgrapli, ])h.oj\o graph, hiography, umltigrapli, litho- 
 graph, grapliiiQ, and others have the common part, 
 -graph. This common element, of course, has a meaning 
 
 193 
 
194 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 which helps to make up the total meaning of each word in 
 which it occurs. It is from the Greek word grapho (I 
 write). It is used w^ith other significant parts to make up 
 the meaning of the words mentioned above. 
 
 1. Telegraph (to write from a distance), from two Greek words, 
 
 tele (far or distant) and grapJio (I write). When a tele- 
 graph was first invented, it actually did write on a travel- 
 ing strip of paper and the operator did not have to de- 
 pend on sound as now. 
 
 2. PlionograpJi (a recorder or writer of sounds), from pJione 
 
 (sound) and grapJio (I write). 
 
 3. Biography (a record or history of someone's life), from 
 
 bios (life) and grapho (I write). 
 
 4. Multigraph (a machine to write many copies), from the 
 
 Latin word multi (many) and grapho (I write). 
 
 5. Lithograph (a print from a stone plate), from lithos (stone) 
 
 and grapho (I write). Many of our color pictures are 
 lithographs. 
 
 6. Graphite (a material with which we may record or write), 
 
 from grapho (I write) and -ite (of the nature of). 
 
 By studying the first and second words above (tele- 
 graph and phonograph), we see why a far-speaking or 
 far-sounding apparatus came to be called a "telephone." 
 This and many similar words bear evidence that the thor- 
 ough analysis of a comparatively small vocabulary leads 
 the way to the grasp of a far larger stock of words. Just 
 as we have made use of the graph-gvoui), so also we might 
 take the ^e/e-group and study the structure of ^e/ephone, 
 ^e^egraph, ^e^epathy (mental influence from a distance), 
 ^eZegraphone, ^e^epost, and many others which the stu- 
 dent, from this hint, may be able to look up in the dic- 
 tionary for himself. In this lesson we shall list the most 
 serviceable of the word parts which occur often in the 
 building-up of larger words. 
 
 Words like tele and grapho are called "root words." 
 In word-building, we use not only certain fundamental 
 roots, but also prefixes and suffixes. A prefix is a part 
 
VOCABULARY-BUILDING 195 
 
 of a word which is put in front of a root word to make up 
 a larger, new word. A suffix is added after the root word 
 for a similar reason. Thus, to the root change we prefix 
 inter- and get interchange. Inter- means * 'between" or 
 "among." When I say, "I can change this article, " I 
 mean that for the article I may get another — no matter 
 what; hut if I say, "I can interchange these things," I 
 mean that the change must be within a definite group and 
 the substitution of one for the other must be among the 
 members of the group. The suffix -able has an obvious 
 meaning. Therefore, interchangeable means ''able to be 
 changed within a given set or number. ' ' Here we have 
 a root, a prefix, and a suffix. In analyzing words we look 
 for (1) roots, (2) prefixes, and (3) suffixes. A mastery 
 of a relatively small number of these parts will give 
 command over a large vocabulary. 
 
 2. Sources of English Words 
 
 Before listing certain serviceable roots, prefixes, and 
 suffixes, it may be well to mention briefly the way in 
 which the present English vocabulary was built up. It is 
 generally known that modern English is a composite of 
 many languages. Some of our words are of Greek origin, 
 some come from the Latin, some are of Germanic origin, 
 and others are from still other sources or are directly 
 borrowed from modern foreign languages. An example 
 of this last group is chic (pronounced " sheek"), a French 
 word used to mean "stylish," "pert," or "attractively 
 lively." Understanding that there are many sources of 
 vocabulary, we must nevertheless recognize three great 
 well-springs of modern English: Latin, Greek, and 
 Anglo-Saxon. 
 
 In very ancient times, a barbaric people lived in Eng- 
 land. They spoke a Celtic language. But these people 
 
196 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 were conquered and pushed back into AVales, Scotland, 
 aiid Ireland by invaders from Scandinavia and Germany. 
 The conquerors may be considered the founders of our 
 language as we now have it. Though the old Celtic sur- 
 vives to a certain extent in parts of Scotland, Wales, Ire- 
 land, and Brittany, modern English has only a few of its 
 words. They are mostly the names of persons and places, 
 such as Cohb, Jones, Thames, and Kent. Of the common 
 names, the most important are darn, flannel, tartan, 
 plaid, gruel, and brand. 
 
 The incoming Anglo-Saxon language became the back- 
 bone of Old English and later modern English. We need 
 not go into the grannnatical form of this language and its 
 various changes. AVe are concerned mostly with its 
 words and their structure. They are simple, direct, and 
 forceful, usually representing concrete images and 
 strong emotions rather than generalizations and intel- 
 lectual refinements. Thus we find most of the natural phe- 
 nomena and objects in this tongue: hill, dale; sea, land; 
 ivood, ivater, stream; heat, cold; rain, hail, sleet, thunder; 
 sun, moon, stars; earth, fire; spring, winter, summer; 
 morning ^ noon, and night. Family life is also cared for: 
 father, mother, husband, tvife, ividow, son, daughter, 
 child, brother, sister, home, roof, fireside, hearth, etc. 
 The following are typical words expressing strong emo- 
 tions: love with its smile, anger and frown, shame and 
 blush, guilt and gloom, sorroiv and tears. This strong, 
 concrete language, drawing something from the Celtic, 
 became the language of England until the Norman inva- 
 sion in 1066. 
 
 It was through the Norman French tliat classical 
 (Latin and Greek) words were introduced. The Nor- 
 mans, under William the Conqueror, set about to replace 
 the English tongue witli their own language. But they 
 were by no means successful. The two peoples mingled 
 
VOCABULARY-BUILDING 197 
 
 and the language which emerged in Shakespeare's time 
 and continues to the present was more Saxon in gram- 
 matical structure than Norman. But the Norman words, 
 of Latin and Greek origin, were added to the vocabulary. 
 As a result, we now look for Saxon, Latin, and Greek 
 prefixes, roots, and suffixes when we analyze most of the 
 words now in use. 
 
 (a) Latin Prefixes 
 
 For convenience, we shall begin with Latin prefixes 
 and treat some of them in pairs. 
 
 A-, ah-, or abs-, and ad-. — The prefix a-, ah-, or ahs- 
 means ''away" or "from." Thus abjure comes from ah- 
 (away) and jiiro (I swear) and means ''to swear away" 
 or "to forswear something previously acknowledged." 
 Abject comes from ah- and jectus (thrown) and therefore 
 means "throwm away" or "worthless" — carrying with it 
 the notion of "abased," "cast off," or "hopelessly low." 
 
 Look up the following words: avert, abhor, abduct, abnormal, 
 aboriginal, abrupt, abstain, abscond, abrogate. To these add others 
 which may occur to you or which you may look up in the dictionary. 
 
 Ad- means just the opposite, that is, "to," "at," 
 "toward," or "for." Admire comes from ad- (at) and 
 miror (I wonder). Adore is from ad- and oro (I pray or 
 speak) and therefore means "to pray to" or "to wor- 
 ship." An advocate is one who calls out for {voco, I call) 
 or speaks for a cause. 
 
 Look up the following words: advent, admission, address, adept, 
 adhere, adjourn, adjust, administer, admit, adopt. 
 
 Sometimes the d in ad- is left out or assimilated to the 
 following letter, and we find aspire, ascribe, avow, accept, 
 affi<jo, annul, and attract. 
 
 Ante- and post-. — Ante- means "before" and post- 
 means "after." Thus we have antehellinn and postbel- 
 
198 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 lum — "before the war" and "after the war." (Inciden- 
 tally helium is a root from the Latin and means "war"; 
 we see it in rebellious, bellicose, rebel, belligerent, etc.) 
 
 Look up the following words: antecedent, antechamber, antedate, 
 antediluvian, anticipate, antiquity. 
 
 For post- as a prefix, note postscript, which means 
 "that which is written after" ; also note postpone, poster- 
 ity, postgraduate. This prefix is used in many compound, 
 technical words, such as post-natal, which means "havin*;' 
 happened after birth," and post-frontal, "back of the 
 frontal bone of the skull." 
 
 Look up the following words: anterior — posterior; anteprandial — 
 postprandial ; antemeridian — postmeridian. 
 
 Circum-. — Circum- signifies "about" or "around." 
 Circumambulate comes from circum- (around) and am- 
 hulo (I walk) and means "to walk around." Circumfer- 
 ence is from circum- (around) and fero (I bear or carry) 
 and means "that which is borne or carried around," as 
 the boundary of a circle. Circumstances are things which 
 stand about or around. A circumspect person is one who 
 looks {spec, look) all around a thing or problem before he 
 acts. We circumvent another when we get {ven, come) 
 all around him or his plans. 
 
 Look up the following words : circumlocution, circumscribe, circuni- 
 polar, circumnavigate. 
 
 Sub- and super-. — Sub- signifies "under"; super-, 
 "above" or "over." Thus we have subcellar and super- 
 structure. Subdue is from sub- (under) and duco (I 
 lead) ; consequently, subdue is almost identical in mean- 
 ing with overcome. It will interest the student to note 
 these two words, which mean about the same thing. The 
 Latin got the better of an enemy by the indirect method 
 of leading him under, as shown in subdue, while the 
 
VOCABULARY-BUILDING 199 
 
 Saxon word, overcome, gives the feeling of beating one 
 directly by a strong, face-on attack. 
 
 The meaning of super- can be gathered from super- 
 abundance, which means "more than an abundance" — 
 "a generous plenty." Superfine is more than fine or 
 overfine, and superfluous is more than enough — to over- 
 flowing {fluo,li\ow). 
 
 Look up the following words: submarine, subterranean, subaerial, 
 subaltern, subconscious, subcontract, subdivision, subject (as a noun, 
 adjective, or verb), subjugate, submission, subordinate, subpoena. 
 
 It will be noted that often before c, f, g, m, p, and r, the 
 h is assimilated to the following letter. We find 
 succor (to run to a person, to come up as an aid or sup- 
 port), from suh- (under) and curro (I run) ; other exam- 
 ples are sufix, supplant, surreptitious. 
 
 Look up the following words: superficial, supernatural, supercil- 
 ious (a very interesting word), superintendent. 
 
 Sometimes super- is written sur-, as in surprise, sur- 
 round, surrender, survive, survey. 
 
 Trans-. — Trans- means "across." See transfer (to 
 bear or carry across). 
 
 Look up the following words: transcontinental, translate, trans- 
 form, transmigration, transcend, transfuse, transfix, transmit. 
 
 Inter-. — Inter- means "between" or "among." Thus, 
 intercollegiate means "between colleges," as used in 
 the expression, "intercollegiate football." Interrupt 
 means "to break in between." A rupture is a break of 
 any sort. Interchangeable parts are those which are 
 changeable among themselves. 
 
 Look up the following words : interact, interbreed, intercede, inter- 
 cept, intercommunicate, intercourse, interdict, interest, interfere, inter- 
 fuse, interjection, interlock, intermediate, intermission, interrogate, 
 intervene. 
 
200 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Per-. — This prefix means "througli." Join it to the 
 Latin root, meare (to pass), and you get permeare (to 
 pass through). The English word is permeate. There- 
 fore permeate means "to pass through," "to fill the crev- 
 ices or pores and to pervade a thing. " 
 
 Look up the following words : pervade, perspiration, perpetrate, 
 perjury, permanent, permit, peruse, perverse, persist. 
 
 Ex- and m-. — Ex- means "out," while in-, as might be 
 guessed, means "in." Thus, we have export, which 
 means "that which is carried out," and import, "that 
 which is carried in. ' ' 
 
 Look up the following words : expel, exact, example, exceed, except, 
 exchange, excite, expand; increase, incline, inclose, inception, incarna- 
 tion. 
 
 It will be noted that in- may also mean "not," as in 
 incautious (not cautious). See also improper {in- and 
 proper), incontestable, independent, and insufficient. 
 
 Other Important Latin Prefixes. — While we cannot 
 give so much space to all the Latin prefixes, the following 
 list may easily be studied by the student who follows the 
 method already suggested. Of course, the dictionary 
 must be consulted all the time. 
 
 1. C071- (together or with) , as in ' ' co^ttend, ' ' to strive with ; 
 
 " co?( vention," a coming together. 
 
 2. de- (down from), as in ''descend," to climb down. 
 
 3. re- (back or again), as in "recline," to lean back; "re- 
 
 turn, ' ' to turn again. 
 
 4. pro- (forward or ahead), as in "provide," to look 
 
 ahead ; ' ' promote, ' ' to move ahead or before. 
 
 5. pre- (before), as in "predict," to tell before; "pre- 
 
 lude," play before. 
 
 6. po.s'^- (after), as in "postpone," to place after; "post- 
 
 lude, ' ' play after. 
 
 7. non- (not), as in " 7ioneombatant " or ^'nonsense." 
 
 There are other Latin prefixes, but those are the most 
 important. 
 
VOCABULARY-BUILDING 201 
 
 (b) Greek Prefixes 
 
 There are not, in English, so many prefixes of Greek 
 origin as of Latin origin, yet the following selected ones 
 do not exhaust the list. 
 
 1. a- or an- (not or without) , as in ' ' atheist, ' ' one without a 
 
 God; "achromatic," without color; "aphasia," 
 lack of speech; "amnesia," lack of memory. An 
 anesthetic {an-, not, aistlietos, sensible) is some- 
 thing to take away sensation — chemicals like ether 
 and chloroform. 
 
 2. amhi- or ampM- (double), as in " amhidexivous," dex- 
 
 trous with both hands, as though having two right 
 hands; "amphibious," double-lived, as a frog, 
 which can live in water or on land. An amphi- 
 theatre was a place with a complete circle of seats 
 while the ancient theatre had but a half-circle of 
 seats; thus an amphitheatre was a double theatre. 
 
 3. ana- (back again), as in " a^i-alysis, " a tracing back 
 
 again; "anagram," something written (gram) 
 which may be rearranged, used anew, or used 
 again. The game of anagrams consists of rearrang- 
 ing the letters of one word so as to form as many 
 other words as possible. 
 
 4. ant- or aiiti- (opposite), as in "awf arctic," opposite the 
 
 arctic or north; "antipathy," an opposite or 
 antagonistic feeling. 
 
 5. di- or dia- (through or between), as in "cZiameter," the 
 
 measure through ; ' ' dialogue, ' ' speech between two 
 persons. 
 
 6. epi- (upon), as in "epidemic," upon the people — a sick- 
 
 ness upon the people. 
 
 7. hyper- (over or beyond), as in " hij percviticRl," over- 
 
 critical. 
 
 8. meta- (beyond), as in "wie^aphysics," a study beyond 
 
 the physical into the spiritual. 
 
 9. peri- (around), as in "perimeter," the measure around 
 
 — the circumference. 
 10. sy-, syn-, or sym- (together), "si/nchronous," together 
 in time — at the same time; "si/mpathy," fellow 
 feeling or suffci'ing together with another; "syr,i- 
 phony," blending together of sounds. 
 
202 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (c) Some Saxon Prefixes 
 
 The Saxon prefixes are easy because most of them bear 
 the regular English meaning which they have as inde- 
 pendent words. The italicized parts of the following 
 words are such prefixes: doivnYight, midship), nothing 
 or nobody, offset, onset or onslaught, ow^bid or outr-an, 
 overflow, underlored, and npMt Note also the following : 
 
 1. a- (at, in, or on), as in "afar," at a distance; "afoot," 
 
 on foot. 
 
 2. he- (to or on) , as in ' ' bestir, ' ' to stir ; ' ' &edrip, ' ' drip on. 
 
 3. for- (away or not), as in ''forgiYe," give away; "for- 
 
 get, ' ' not to get. 
 
 4. fore- ( before ) , as in ' ' foretell " ; " forewarn. ' ' 
 
 5. mis- ( wrong) , as in ' ' wiisspell " ; " mistake " ; " mis- 
 
 state. ' ' 
 
 6. n- ( not) , as in ' ' neither, ' ' not either ; ' ' ?iever " ; " none. ' ' 
 
 7. un- (removal or not), as in "unhand''; "unjust." 
 
 8. with- (from or against), as in "withdraw"; "with- 
 
 stand. ' ' 
 
 (d) Suffixes 
 
 There are a great number of Latin, though not so many 
 Greek, suffixes in our English vocabulary. We shall list 
 some of the most important. But -first note for yourself 
 the influence of a suffix. Take modest; now add -y as a 
 suffix and make up your mind what the -y stands for in 
 modesty. Take the ending -ry and note its influence when 
 added to hrave so as to form bravery. These suffixes 
 change adjectives which might be applied to one man 
 (that is, a man who is modest or brave) to the name of 
 the quality which that man possesses — in these cases, 
 "modesty" and "bravery." The Saxon suffix for the 
 same thing is -ness, as in "goodness"; " sweetl^e55 " ; 
 "brie;htwe55." 
 
VOCABULARY-BUILDING 203 
 
 The simplest suffixes to understand are the Saxon. The 
 following is a representative list : 
 
 1. -dom (state or dominion), as in "kingdom" ; "free- 
 
 dom-' ' ; " ChristencZowi. ' ' 
 
 2. -en (made of), as in "woole?i"; "wooden"; "leaden"; 
 
 "brazen," made of brass. 
 
 3. -er (one who) , as in ' ' winner, ' ' one who wins ; ' ' singer, ' ' 
 
 one who sings. 
 
 4. -em (towards or of), as in "norther?i," towards or of 
 
 the north. 
 
 5. -ess (female), as in "lioness." 
 
 6. -fid (abounding or full), as in "plenti/i^r' ; "beauti- 
 
 M" 
 
 7. -liood (state), as in " mother/ioocZ " ; " f ather/ioocZ " ; 
 
 ' ' maiden/ioocZ " ; " knight/ioocZ. ' ' 
 
 8. -isli (like or belonging), as in "yellowis/i"; "DamsTi." 
 
 9. -kin (small), as in "lambA'in," little lamb; "fir/cin, " a 
 
 small barrel or cask. 
 
 10. -ling (little or young), as in "diiGkling" ; "fledgZingr." 
 
 11. -like and -ly (manner), as in "womanlike" and "wo- 
 
 manly. ' ' 
 
 12. -7iess (condition or quality), as in "happiness"; 
 
 ' ' brightness " ; " heal thi?( ess. ' ' 
 
 13. -ock ( small or young) , as in " hillocfc " ; " huWock. ' ' 
 
 14. -ship (state or office), as in " courtship" ; "steward- 
 
 s/up. ' ' 
 
 15. -some (like or causing), as in "gladsome," causing 
 
 gladness; "wearisome"; "tiresome"; "irksome." 
 
 16. -ster (one who) , as in " spinster, ' ' one who spins ; ' ' song- 
 
 ster." 
 
 17. -ward (toward), as in " heavemoard " ; "southM;arcZ"; 
 
 ' ' iorward. ' ' 
 
 18. -wise (way), as in "sideime," side way; " othermse " ; 
 
 ' ' thusM^'ise. ' ' 
 
 19. -y (little), as in "babi/," little babe. 
 
 A few of the classical suffixes are here given: 
 
 1. -ac (pertaining to), as in "cardiac," pertaining to the 
 
 heart. 
 
 2. -aceous (having the character of), as in "herbaceous." 
 
 3. -an or -iV/n (pertaining to or one who), as in "sylvan," 
 
 pertaining to the woods ; ' ' christian, ' ' one who ac- 
 knowledges Christ. 
 
204 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 4. -ance or -ancy (state of being), as in "constancy,'' 
 
 state of being constant. 
 
 5. -ant (one who), as in "servant." 
 
 6. -ar (pertaining to, one who, or having) , as in ' ' nebular, ' ' 
 
 pertaining to the nebulus; "scholar," one who 
 studies; "muscular," having muscles. 
 
 7. -able or -ible (may be or worthy), as in "curahle" ; " re- 
 
 sponsible." 
 
 8. -ee (one to whom), as in "payee"; "donee." 
 
 9. -ify (to make) , as in ' ' clarify, ' ' to make clear ; ' ' deify, ' ' 
 
 to make a god. 
 
 10. -ic or -ical (like or pertaining to), as in "angeKc, " like 
 
 an angel; "botanico?," pertaining to botany or the 
 flowers. 
 
 11. -ics (the science or art of), as in "mathematics"; 
 
 "therapeutics," science of curing — medicine. 
 
 12. -ine (belonging to), as in "leom?ie, " belonging to the 
 
 lion; "marme," belonging to the sea. 
 
 13. -Hon or -sion (act of or state of being), as in "conflagra- 
 
 tion," act of burning; "perfection," state of the 
 perfect. 
 
 14. -ist (one who), as in "theorisf," one who theorizes; 
 
 ' ' botanist " ; " chemist. ' ' 
 
 15. -ity or -ty (state of being), as in "humidity," state of 
 
 being humid or moist; "modesty/," state of being 
 modest. 
 
 16. -ose (full of), as in "verbose," full of words — talkative. 
 
 17. -ry (being, art of, or place where), as in "bravert/," 
 
 being brave ; ' ' surgery, ' ' art of the surgeon ; 
 "fisher^/," place for fishing. 
 
 18. -itude (state of), as in "soHtwcZe," state of being alone. 
 
 19. -ule (little), as in "globule," little globe; "granule," 
 
 little grain. 
 
 (e) Root Words 
 
 Saxon root words are simple and hardly need treat- 
 ment, bnt we sliall list a few^ useful Latin and Greek 
 words which are often found as parts of larger words in 
 modern English. 
 
VOCABULARY-BUILDING 205 
 
 1. cor (heart), as in '^core/^ heart; ''cordial," hearty; 
 
 "concord," {con, together, and cor, heart), hearts 
 beating together. On the other hand, note "dis- 
 cord," hearts apart or disagreement. 
 
 Can you find other words with cor as a part? 
 
 2. aqua (water), as in "aquarium/' a water tank in which 
 
 fishes are kept. An aqueduct (aqua, water, and 
 due, lead) is a means of leading water from one 
 place to another. 
 
 Look up the following words : aquatic and aqueous. 
 Do you know other words with aqua as the root? 
 
 3. ani7na (life), as in "aniwmtion," liveliness. An i7iani- 
 
 mate object is one without life. 
 
 Look up the following words: animal, animus, ani- 
 mosity, and animadvert. 
 
 4. due (lead), as in "reduce," to make less since it gives 
 
 the notion 6f retracing steps because you are led 
 back; "procZi/ce," to bring forth. We induce a 
 man to do a thing because we lead him into the 
 enterprise. We educate a boy by drawing out 
 (e, out) what is in him. 
 
 What does ductile mean? Look up other words with 
 due as a part. 
 
 5. audi (hear), as in " auditormm," a place where we hear 
 
 speeches and music. A sound is audible when the 
 ear can hear it. An audience is a group of listen- 
 ers. It is interesting to note that an audit which 
 is an investigation of accounts came from audi 
 because such investigations were originally judicial 
 hearings. 
 
 Look up the following words: auditory, inaudible, 
 audiphone, audiometer. 
 
 Z. spec (seeing or sight), as in "spectacles," things with 
 which to see. We inspect when we look into a 
 thing. 
 
 Look up the following words: spectrum, respect, 
 retrospect, expect, spectator, and other words containin-^ 
 this part. 
 
 7. cap (take) , as in " capture, ' ' to take ; ''captive. '* 
 
206 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 How does captivate differ from capturel See also 
 capable. 
 
 cap (head), as in "captain"; "capital"; "capitol"; 
 "caption." Capillary means "thread-like or 
 minute tube" because such a tube is fine as a hair. 
 A hair, in Latin, was capillus because it grew on 
 the head (caput). 
 
 Find other words with cap or capt meaning either 
 "head" or "take." 
 
 8. tract (draw or pull), as in "detract." To detract from 
 
 a person is to draw away from his reputation or 
 position. One attracts when he draws others to 
 him. 
 
 Look up the following words: tractions, retract, ex- 
 tract. 
 
 9. voc (voice), as in "focal." Vocal music comes from the 
 
 voice and from no other instrument. 
 
 Look up the following words: advocate, invocate, 
 vocative, vocation, avocation, revoke. 
 
 10. volv (rolling or turning), as in "revolve." We revolve 
 
 a thing when we turn it over physically or in our 
 minds. 
 
 Look up the following words: evolution, involution, 
 revolution, and others. Why is a pistol called a revolver '1 
 
 11. temp (time), as in "temporizes," to take up time or to 
 
 delay. 
 
 Look up the following words: contemporarj', ex- 
 temporize, temporal, temporary, temperate. After look- 
 ing in a good dictionary, tell why temperance, tempera- 
 ment, and temperature are connected in meaning witli 
 the word which represents them. 
 
 12. gren (beginning), as in "(rcnesis." The book of 6rewe.s?'s 
 
 in the Bible {hiblos, book) tells of the beginning. 
 A geneology is an account or the words (logos, 
 word) about a man's origin. Hydrog'eii (hydr, 
 water) is the element necessary to originate water. 
 (Note hydrant and other words.) 
 
 Look up the following words: primogeniture, homo- 
 geneous, heterogeneous, exogenous, and genetic. 
 
VOCABULARY-BUILDING 207 
 
 13. arch (leader or ruler) , as in " monarcJiy. ' ' A monnrcJiy 
 
 has one {monos, one) ruler. 
 
 Look up the following words: hierarchy, heptarchy, 
 archives. Why should records be called archives! 
 
 14. log (word, or that which is spoken and recorded), as in 
 
 "biology," the science which deals with the phe- 
 nomena of life. It is a collection of the words on 
 that subject. Antliropology studies man {anthro- 
 pos, man). 
 
 Look up the following words: logic, analogy, physi- 
 ology, psychology, and the other "ologies" or studies. 
 
 15. gram (marriage) , as in ' ' polygramy, " the practice of hav- 
 
 ing many {poly) wives; "higamj," having two 
 {hi) wives. 
 
 What does monogamy mean? 
 
 16. poly (many), as in ' ' poZt/technie. " A polyteclmic insti- 
 
 tute teaches many technical branches. 
 
 Look up the following words: polygon, polytheism, 
 polydactyl. Why do we call a man who speaks many 
 languages a polyglot '! 
 
 17. auto (self), as in "at<^omobile," a vehicle which moves 
 
 itself. Auto-intoxication is the intoxication from 
 poisons within one's own body. 
 
 What is an autocrat '! 
 
 We have by no means exhausted the important root 
 words of the languages, but Ave have given enough types 
 to interest the student in the discovery of prefixes, suf- 
 fixes, and roots, and to stimulate him to undertake word 
 analysis. If you should like more of these parts of 
 words, study your dictionary, consult an English and a 
 Latin grammar, and keep a notebook section as suggested 
 in the following paragraph. 
 
 Each time you come across a new word, look it up. 
 Has it a prefix? Very well, try to find as many other 
 words as you can with the same prefix and study its effect 
 upon the meaning of each. Is there a suffix? Then do 
 
208 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the same thing in reference to it. The root words, how- 
 ever, will be by far the most interesting. Any student 
 will find it well worth his time to keep a notebook of 
 roots. Devote one or more pages to each root and the 
 family of words in which it occurs. For instance, take 
 poll (city). Write on the page as follows: 
 
 POLi (city) 
 
 metropolis, greatest {meter, mother) city, 
 cosmopolitan city, a city of the world {cosmos) 
 
 with all races for its people, 
 police, city guard, 
 politics, city affairs, and, since Greek cities were 
 
 the units of government, governmental affairs; 
 
 and so on. 
 
 ^^Hiile, of course, the study of foreign languages will 
 help the student greatly in the mastery of English words, 
 much progress can be made by one who speaks only the 
 mother tongue if he systematically consults the diction- 
 ary and follows the directions given in this lesson. In- 
 deed such a practice will make the acquisition of a foreign 
 vocabulary easy for him when he does take up the study 
 of tongues other than ours. Certainly he will have an 
 insight into his own language and he will, no doubt, use 
 words at his command in a discriminating way. The 
 greatest safeguard against the incorrect or inaccurate 
 use of words is a knowledge of their original meanings 
 and the primitive meanings of their parts. 
 
 In conclusion, then, I strongly recommend each student 
 to keep a notebook which fits easily in the pocket (prefer- 
 ably the loose-leaf kind) for the piirpose of recording 
 words in groups. The grouping will be according to 
 common parts. There will be families brought together 
 because of a connnon root, groups with the same prefixes, 
 
VOCAlM'l.ARY-HriLDlXG 209 
 
 and others recorded one after the other Ijecause of siifhx 
 ag-reemeiit. This work will be of absorbing interest and 
 Ijermanent profit. 
 
 Assignment of Woek 
 
 The written exercises in tliis entire lesson slumld be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies uf the written exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson through two or three times so as to 
 get the entire meaning. 
 
 Second and Third Days. — Take time to look up all the words 
 Avhich are mentioned in the lesson and which the lesson does 
 not explain fully. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Outline a speech about the origin of English 
 words. Deliver it orally from the memorized outline. Be 
 careful to have your illustrations well prepared. Get some 
 from other sources than this lesson. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Prepare a speech on the subject, "Vocabulary- 
 Building. ' ' 
 
 Additional Reminders 
 
 1. Are you keeping up your posture and breathing exer- 
 cises ? 
 
 2. Are you observing and criticising other speakers? 
 
 3. Are you practicing many extemporaneous speeches? 
 
 4. Are you working on your vocabulary ? 
 
 5. Are you keeping up the retiection hour? 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are suggestive merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What is the difference between exactness and facility in 
 the use of words ? Do you use words with exactness ? Have you 
 facility? 
 
 2. Is a large vocabulary necessary for a speaker? Is a 
 ready use of words necessary? Of the two, scope and availa- 
 bility, which is more vital to a speaker's success? 
 
 3. What is a prefix? a suffix? a root? 
 
 4. What are the great sources of English words? Name 
 other sources. 
 
 5. How do'3s consult differ in meaning from confer ? 
 
 6. How are perplexity, astonishment, hewilderment, and 
 confusion related? 
 
 7. What added idea has novel over new ? 
 
 8. Distinguish between contemporary history and modern 
 history, 
 
 9. How are model, pattern, prototype, and archetype re- 
 lated? 
 
 10. Can you get other groups of words like those mentioned 
 in Question 5? Does word analysis help you to make distinc- 
 tions? Does it aid in understanding words? Keep a collection 
 of related groups. 
 
 11. What effect on the style of a man's speech has the use 
 of a great many Saxon words? a great many classical words? 
 
 12. Why should a vocabulary be made up of words of va- 
 rious sources ? 
 
 13. In actual address, should you incline toward one class 
 of words, or is variety desirable ? 
 
 14. Can variety be secured by an effort of the will at the 
 time of delivery, or will it arise naturally if the preparation and 
 study of words has been varied ? 
 
 210 
 
k y 
 
 LESSON 12 
 
 GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 
 
 in Lessons 9 and 10 we consider the ways in which a 
 speaker could give an audience an appreciation of images. 
 W^e assumed that an image of something actually seen, 
 heard, felt — in short, experienced — was the simplest men- 
 tal possession which a speaker could consciously have. 
 The use of words to transfer this image to the mind of the 
 listener, we called "description" in some cases and "nar- 
 ration" in others. But in all cases, we insisted that im- 
 ages were the impressions of particular things* concrete 
 things, real, existing things. Among our examples of 
 images were a particular sunrise as witnessed by Edward 
 Hverett, the execution of a French criminal in a certain 
 place at a definite time, and the re-creation of the scene 
 enacted on Bunker Hill during the nineteenth of April. 
 1776. All these were records of particular things. But 
 the mind often goes beyond the particular. 
 
 It is well known that after the mind has been im- 
 pressed with a number of particular experiences, it be- 
 gins to group them together and to note points of likeness 
 and difference. Then emerges a general notion. After 
 seeing many sunrises, we note that while on one morning 
 the sun looked red and on another more golden, while on 
 one morning there was a mist and on another all was 
 clear, still every sunrise had some characteristics in 
 common with every other sunrise. These points of like- 
 ness exist for all and are inseparably connected with our 
 mental appraisal of sunrises in general. This and other 
 abstract notions fill our minds and seek expression dur- 
 
 211 
 
212 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ing a speech. It will be the purpose of this lesson to ex- 
 plain the nature of general ideas or concepts (as the 
 psychologists would call them) and to outline methods of 
 expressing them to other people. 
 
 1. Individual Differences and Family Likenesses 
 
 Let us suppose that you were to attend the meeting of 
 a New York local union of typesetters. The men would 
 come and the chairman Avould call the meeting to order. 
 The minutes of the last meeting would record, let us say, 
 that a resolution had been passed to the effect that the 
 period of apprenticeship in a certain line of employment 
 should be three years instead of two. A further reading 
 would tell you that $300 had been spent for sick relief and 
 that the strike in such and such publishing house had been 
 arbitrated with the following scale of Avages and hours of 
 employment as the basis for the resumption of work, etc. 
 Then the new business would include a discussion of the 
 recently proposed workmen's compensation law and a 
 committee would be appointed to attend the legislative 
 hearing as an instructed delegation. 
 
 On another evening you visit the bricklayers ' union and 
 hear a discussion of the duties of a master bricklayer in 
 contradistinction to those of a helper or hod carrier. The 
 rule that the trowel must be retained in the hand through- 
 out the hours of employment, is repeatedly mentioned. So 
 also do you find out that there is a certain, standard 
 number of bricks to be laid as constituting a union day's 
 work. Life insurance, you learn, has just been paid to a 
 widow whose husband died the month before. Then, going 
 to the meeting of a miners' union in Pennsylvania, an- 
 other of locomotive engineers, and yet another of marble 
 cutters, you are informed concerning the details of each 
 anion's business. 
 
GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 213 
 
 After visiting many unions, you discover that while one 
 deals with this trade and another with that, while one has 
 a long period of apprenticeship and another a short 
 period or no apprenticeship at all, while one insists on a 
 rigid wage scale and another on a flexible rate of pay, 
 while one objects to the introduction of machinery and 
 another offers no objections whatsoever — all have certain 
 points in common. All stand for collective bargaining, 
 so that the individual workman is not at the mercy of a 
 more powerful employer, all seek to shorten the hours 
 of work and lengthen the time available for rest and 
 recreation, all seek to keep their members informed con- 
 cerning the state of their trade throughout the country. 
 In short, certain things are essential to all unions 
 (these are the family points of agreement) while certain 
 other things are peculiar to particular unions. Your im- 
 pressions of a particular union are those received 
 through your senses while at its meeting, but your notion 
 of "labor union" as a general name includes only the 
 features which are general or common to all. 
 
 We form concepts or general notions of all things 
 which are similar in certain essential respects though 
 possessing individual differences. Thus your concept of 
 "house" embraces certain features of structure and 
 shelter possibilities, and disregards accidental or minor 
 details of size, material, and color of the paint. John 
 Smith and Tom Jones differ from each other in many re- 
 spects, but both come under your notion of "man" be- 
 cause they possess the features which are characteristic 
 of manhood. In other words, an image or the impression 
 of a real thing which you can get through your senses 
 is particular, while a concept or notion of the essential 
 features of every member of a class is general. Concepts 
 include only general characteristics. ~^ 
 
214 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 2. Kinds of Concepts 
 
 General ideas which you may want to express to others 
 are of various kinds. The most important are : 
 
 1. Classes of physical things, usually expressed by a 
 common noun. Thus the word "house" is the name of a 
 class of buildings which have certain characteristics in 
 coimnon. So also: desk, man, snowstorm, suspension- 
 bridge, battleship, aeroplane, balloon — each representing 
 a general group of individual things. 
 
 2. Processes or principles of operation. For instance, 
 suppose you are a dairy man and you have knowledge of 
 the process of pasteurizing milk ; your notion is general 
 rather than particular, especially if you are acquainted 
 with more than one pasteurizing plant. You know that 
 whether the milk is brought in cans or bottles, from near 
 or far, it must all be put into a tank where its tempera- 
 ture is brought up to a certain point at which disease 
 bacteria are rendered harmless, and the temperature 
 must be maintained at this point the required period of 
 time. The heating tank may be of one or another mate- 
 rial in any particular plant, but in all cases it must be 
 constructed so as to be able to stand the heat and it must 
 be of a material which will not harm the milk. Such is 
 your concept of the process of pasteurization. Any prin- 
 ciple of operation or process, be it the one mentioned, 
 electrotyping, printing, surgical technique in removing an 
 appendix, method of teaching a language, or what not. 
 may be known as to its general, essential characteristics. 
 These qualities constitute your concept of the process. 
 
 3. Abstract or general qualities, like goodness, utility, 
 or beauty. Suppose you say: ''This blond woman has 
 beauty and so also has that brunette." "This building is 
 beautiful and so is that painting." All these individual 
 things are different, yet each has something which you 
 
GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 215 
 
 call ** beauty." If at some time you were asked just 
 what is meant by "beauty" you would have to make cleai' 
 your general notion. If for instance you should say, 
 * ' The White House is beautiful but the Capitol is not, ' ' it 
 might be necessary for you to make clear the essentials 
 of beauty to defend your statement. 
 
 Most concepts come under the three classes just men- 
 tioned — physical classes, principles or processes, and ab- 
 stract qualities. 
 
 3. The Expression of a Concept 
 
 Concepts, as a rule, can be represented by single words 
 or small groups of words. For example, the word '^util- 
 ity" expresses a general, abstract notion of quality. If 
 you should use that word and all the people who heard 
 you should understand it in exactly the same way that 
 you do, then the single word would fully express the con- 
 cept. But very often listeners either do not know the 
 word at all, or are uncertain concerning its meaning, or 
 attach a meaning to it entirely different from the one you 
 have in mind. Furthermore, besides reacting to the word 
 in the wrong way, the listener may have either no notion 
 at all or a hazy one of the concept you wish to express. 
 Therefore it is usually necessary to express concepts in 
 round-about ways so as to leave no doubt about the grasp 
 of the concepts and therefore the exact meanings which 
 you attach to your words. 
 
 Let us use an illustration already mentioned. You are 
 saying that the aim of all production (the co-operation of 
 land, labor, and capital) is to create utility. Then you ex- 
 plain, saying, ''The only object for engaging in the manu- 
 facture of shoes, is the creation of a useful article, the 
 shoe. Shoes are useful because they are formed so as to 
 protect the feet from rough knocks and from cold. Their 
 
216 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 form and material enable them to serve this useful pur- 
 pose. Their usefulness or utility arises because men have 
 given them the proper form. But even this human need 
 of protection for the feet could not be met if the shoes 
 were not transported to the place where the user needs 
 them. Consequently while the manufacturers create 
 form utility, the railroads give them place utility. Fur- 
 thermore, shoes must be on hand at the time they are 
 needed. The retailer, who keeps a stock from which to 
 meet the user's need at the proper time, gives a time 
 utility to the shoes. All economic production is directed 
 to creating just such utilities in goods or services. Look- 
 ing back at each kind of utility mentioned we can say that 
 utility, in general, is something connected with the good 
 which makes it capable of satisfying human wants." 
 After such a talk, the hearer who had never come across 
 the word '^ utility," would get some idea of its meaning 
 and the one who had not made the abstraction for himself 
 would be guided to make it. The following extract from 
 Henry Ward Beecher's famous speech in London on the 
 question of Slavery (the last of his five speeches in Great 
 Britain) expresses a concept of ''state's rights" in such 
 a way that it will be clear to one who has not had the 
 notion before, and makes clear the use of the words for 
 one who has the notion but has never heard that partic- 
 ular expression of it. 
 
 (a) Example of Expressing a Concept 
 
 Now, take notice first, that the North, hating slavery, having 
 rid itself of it at its own cost, longing for its extinction through- 
 out America, was unable until this war to touch slavery directly. 
 The North could only contend against the slave policy — not di- 
 rectly against slavery. Why? Because slavery was not the 
 creature of national jurisprudence, but of State law, and sub- 
 ject only to State jurisdiction. A direct act on the part of the 
 
 I 
 I 
 
GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 217 
 
 North to abolish slavery would have been revolutionary. (A 
 voice: "We do not understand you.") You will understand 
 me before I have done with you to-night. (Cheers) Such an at- 
 tack would have been a violation of the fundamental principle 
 of State's rights. 
 
 This peculiar structure of our Government is not so unin- 
 telligible to Englishmen as you might think. It is only taking 
 an English idea on a large scale. We have borrowed it from 
 j^ou. A great many do not understand how there can be a State 
 independence under a National Government. Now I am not 
 closely acquainted with your affairs, but the Chamberlain can 
 tell you if I am wrong, when I say that there belong to the old 
 city of London certain private rights that Parliament cannot 
 meddle with. Yet there are elements in which Parliament — 
 that is, the will of the nation — is as supreme over London as 
 over any town or city in the realm. Now, if there are some things 
 which London has kept for her own judgment and will, and yet 
 others which she has given up to the national will, you have 
 herein the principle of the American Government — (cheers) — by 
 which local matters belong exclusively to the local jurisdiction 
 and certain general matters to the National Government. 
 
 1 will give you another illustration that will bring it home 
 to you. There is not a street in London, but, as soon as a man 
 is inside his house he may say, his house is his castle. There is 
 110 law in the realm which can say to that man how many mem- 
 bers shall compose his family — how he shall dress his children^ 
 when they shall get up and when they shall go to bed — how 
 many meals he shall have a day, and of what those meals shall 
 be constituted. The interior economy of the house belongs to the 
 members of the house, yet there are many respects in which 
 every householder is held in check by common rights. They have 
 their own interior and domestic economy, yet they share in other 
 things which are national and governmental. It may be very 
 wrong to give children opium, but all the doctors in London 
 cannot say to a man that he shall not drug his child. It is his 
 business and though it is wrong, it cannot be interfered with. 
 I will give you another illustration. Five men form a partner- 
 ship of business. iNow, that partnership represents the National 
 Government of the I'liited States; but it has relation only to cer- 
 tain great commercial interests common to them all. But each 
 of these five men has another sphere — his family — and in that 
 sphere the man may be a drunkard, a gambler, a lecherous and 
 indecent man, but the firm cannot meddle with his morals. It 
 cannot touch anything except business interests which belong to 
 the firm. Now, our States come together on this doctrine — that 
 
218 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 each State, in respect to those rights and institutions that were 
 locally peculiar to it, was to have undivided sovereignty over its 
 own affairs ; but that all those powers, such as taxes, wars, trea- 
 ties of peace, which belong not only to one State but also in com- 
 mon to all States, went into the General Government. The Gen- 
 eral Government never had the power — the power was never del- 
 egated to it — to meddle with the interior and domestic economy 
 of the States, and it never could be done. You will ask what are 
 we doing it for now ? I will tell you in due time. Have I made 
 that point plain ? ( Cheers ) 
 
 4. Methods of Making Concepts Clear to Others 
 
 A study of the illustration concerning the word ''util- 
 ity" and the Beecher exposition just quoted may give a 
 basis for listing the more important ways of making a 
 concept clear to others. 
 
 1. The specific illustration, strange as it may seem, is 
 the most effective means of making the general concept 
 clear to others. The specific illustration used must have 
 two features, however, if it is to carry with it a grasp of 
 the general notion. 
 
 (a) It must be familiar to the audience. In the extract 
 from Beecher there are three specific illustrations of the 
 general principle which Beecher has in mind — the possi- 
 bility of local authority separate from general authority. 
 In the one case the local independence takes the form of 
 municipal privileges of London, in another it reveals it- 
 self as household rights in contradistinction to municipal 
 laws, and the third shows a separation of business respon- 
 sibility and private, moral responsibility. A grasp of 
 these illustrations makes easy a grasp of the idea of 
 state 's rights. At least one, and possibly two or all three, 
 of these specific instances must have been familiar to per- 
 sons in the audience. 
 
 (b) The instance must have the points essential to the 
 concept which is being expressed, though still possessing 
 
GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 219 
 
 its individual points of difference. Here, each instance 
 given was different in peculiar respects from the slavery 
 rights of states in America, but each had this essential 
 point, that a member of a larger group is restricted in cer- 
 tain respects because of the authority of the group over 
 its members, but he may retain certain peculiar rights 
 which the group cannot alter or diminish. 
 
 2. The direct enumeration of all the essential charac- 
 teristics ivhich make up the concept in terms familiar to 
 the audience, will often be the best way to make the 
 notion clear. Notice the manner in which the apostle im- 
 presses, upon the Corinthians, his idea of the abstract 
 quality of charity (love) as a Christian virtue. 
 
 Though I speak v/ith the tongues of men and angels and have 
 not charity, I am become as a sounding brass and a tinkling cym- 
 bal. And though I have the gift of prophecy and understand all 
 mysteries and have all knowledge, and though I have all faith 
 so that I could remove mountains yet have not charity, I am 
 nothing. And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and 
 though I give my body to be burned and have not charity, it 
 profiteth me nothing. 
 
 Charity suffereth long and is kind ; charity envieth not ; char- 
 ity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, doth not behave itself 
 unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh 
 no evil; rejoiceth not in iniquity but rejoiceth in the truth; 
 beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, en- 
 dureth all things. 
 
 Charity never faileth; but whether there be prophecies, they 
 shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether 
 there be knowledge, it shall pass away. For we know in part and 
 we prophecy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, 
 that which is in part shall be done away. When I was a child, 
 I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child ; 
 but when I became a man, I put away childish things. For now 
 we see as through a glass, darkly; but then, face to face; now 
 I know in part ; but then shall I know even as I am known. 
 
 And now abideth faith, hope, charity — these three ; but the 
 greatest of these is charity. 
 
220 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (a) Contrasting opposite qualities with those enumer- 
 ated often help to make the positive enumerations more 
 clear. Notice in the passage above, how the permanent, 
 abiding quality of love is made clear by contrast with 
 the temporary and partial nature of prophecy and knowl- 
 edge. In the second paragraph, long suffering is men- 
 tioned at the beginning and end while in the middle it is 
 brought out by an enumeration of opposite characteris- 
 tics. In the last two paragraphs, again, the permanence 
 of charity (or love, as the revised version of the Bible has 
 it) is brought out by contrast. In Lesson 1, the exposi- 
 tion of the notion of tact depends on enumeration and 
 contrasted enumeration. 
 
 3. A careful discrimination between the notion and 
 another very similar notion helps to make it clear. This 
 method is often found in legal addresses, especially the 
 judge's charge to the jury. We can imagine a judge say- 
 ing the following : 
 
 You have heard the matron of the prison testify that this 
 nurse, accused of murdering her employer, said that she did in- 
 deed give Mr. A — an overdose of strychnine on the night of 
 A^piil the twelfth, in consequence of which he died. The prose- 
 cuting attorney has been unable to obtain a more complete state- 
 ment from the accused, though she acknowledges all the matron 
 says and furthermore admits that she once stole money from her 
 employer. 
 
 Now the prosecuting attorney contends that the statement to 
 the matron is a confession of guilt — the indictment being for 
 murder in the first degree. It will be necessary for me to in- 
 struct you concerning the nature of a confession of guilt, for if 
 you judge this to have been such a confession, then you must 
 render a verdict of guilty. 
 
 If a person were to go to a store and take away a package 
 which did not belong to him, under the impression that he had a 
 right to take it because a third person had bought it and left it 
 on the counter for him, then the acknowledgment of taking the 
 package is not a confession of guilt to the charge of theft. To 
 confess theft, the accused must not only acknowledge the fact of 
 
GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 221 
 
 taking the package but also the intent to take something to which 
 he was not entitled. What the accused in such a case makes, is 
 not a confession but an admission. A confession in criminal law 
 is a statement freely made which acknowledges! deed and intent 
 sufficient to establish guilt; but an admission is a statement of 
 fact which may or may not incriminate the maker in relation 
 to the charge mentioned in the indictment. 
 
 The admission in this particular case makes it unnecessary for 
 the prosecutor to bring forth further evidence to prove that the 
 overdose was administered by the accused;* but to convict the 
 accused of murder in the first degree, he must convince you be- 
 yond a reasonable doubt that when she administered the strych- 
 nine she fully intended to kill her employer and she succeeded 
 in carrying out her intention. 
 
 Furthermore, the confession that she stole money from her em- 
 ployer, though a i-eal confession of theft, does not constitute 
 (together with the other admission) a confession of guilt when 
 the indictment is for murder. Of course it does tend to break 
 down her moral reputation ; but it does not change an admission 
 of fact to a confession of guilt. A confession is a voluntary and 
 complete acknowledgment of all that constitutes the crime stated 
 in the indictment. 
 
 5. Thoroughness in the Expression of a Concept 
 
 A general notion is fully expressed when two things 
 have been accomplished : (1) When it has been identi- 
 fied as a member of some larger or broader class which 
 is familiar to the audience, (2) when its own, essential, 
 and peculiar characteristics have been brought out. It 
 will be noticed, in the example of the judge charging the 
 jury, the confession is identified as belonging to a greater 
 class of things, namely, statements of any sort made by 
 an accused person. Its own peculiar characteristics, 
 which differentiate it from others of the general group, 
 were then enumerated and made clear. They were the 
 voluntary character of the statement, without the influ- 
 ence of fear or hope, the acknowledgment of fact, the ac- 
 knowledgment of intent, and the complete covering of all 
 the definition of the crime stated in the indictment. In 
 
 I 
 
222 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 most cases, the thorough listing of all the essential chai 
 acteristics of the general notion is sufficient to make li 
 clear, but the thorough method calls also for the location 
 in a greater class. 
 
 6. Definition 
 
 The most compact and economical means of represent- 
 ing a concept completely, is the logical definition. Ob- 
 serve that in the following definitions the greater class ir, 
 expressed in italics and the essential features which dif- 
 ferentiate the notion from others of the class, in roman 
 type. 
 
 1. The protective tariff is a tax on imports, designed to raise 
 the market price on foreign goods brought into this country, in 
 order to give American producers a competitive advantage. 
 
 2. A trust is a comhination of tlie means of production in a 
 certain field sufficiently powerful to control enough of the output 
 in that field to enable it to regulate, in a monopolistic manner, 
 the prices of the commodities it produces. 
 
 3. A shipping subsidy is a grant of money by the government 
 to shipowners, made with the general expectation of fostering the 
 shipping industry and not made because of specific services to be 
 rendered in return. 
 
 4. Economics is the study which seeks to discover the origin 
 and nature of human wants and to formulate the laws according 
 to which men in organized society satisfy those wants. 
 
 5. State's rights is a principle in government whereby a state, 
 though subject to the authority of the national government in 
 matters of national welfare, is recognized as having its own au- 
 thority over state policies and institutions. 
 
 It can be seen that a good, logical definition contains a 
 compact mass of matter. But its very compactness, the 
 thorough covering of the whole ground in a small com- 
 pass, renders it of little service as a means of expressing 
 a notion to one who is not already fairly acquainted with 
 it. The great value of the definition is to sum up in con- 
 venient form and to drive home a notion already made 
 
GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 223 
 
 clear by methods we have described. Notice that in the 
 judge's charge, on page 220 the definition is the last 
 thing given. It comes at the end of a fairly lengthy expo- 
 sition. Would this definition have given much enlighten- 
 ment to one in need of its information if it had not been 
 preceded by the illustrations and discriminations? But 
 on the other hand, coming at the end, does it not gather 
 together in excellent shape for ready reference, a notion 
 made clear by the more expansive method of expression? 
 Often we see text -books which begin their treatment of 
 subjects with definitions, the meanings of which are grad- 
 ually unfolded by illustrations. The better method is to 
 begin with the specific cases — enumeration and contrast, 
 and work on till the notion takes shape in the mind of the 
 reader or listener. Then seal it with a proper definition. 
 Our advice, therefore, is to employ definition, not so much 
 for the purpose of giving information, but rather to 
 record your notion in crisp and accurate manner for 
 ready reference. 
 
 7. Importance of Skill in Making Concepts Clear 
 
 We have already intimated that it is very necessary f or 
 a speaker to be able to re-create clear images ; it is just 
 as important for him to convey his general notions to 
 others. In a real speech we are not likely to find images 
 and only images, or concepts and only concepts, but these 
 and other things which the speaker has in mind come 
 forth intermingled. Though we discussed the expression 
 of images in a separate lesson, that is no reason for as- 
 suming that a speech will be devoted to this element of 
 expression alone. So also with the concept. Use it where 
 it is necessary, when it forms part of your message and is 
 of service, and in doing so, follow the method outlined in 
 this lesson. As a rule, a speaker is primarily interested 
 
224 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 in images and general ideas because thej^ are the informa- 
 tion which the audience must have as the basis for some 
 argument or appeal. Unless the audience has some facts 
 in mind (particular and general truths) it mil not be able 
 to follow an argument. Furthermore, the clearer the pres- 
 entation of the facts and concepts, the easier it is to fol- 
 low the argument, while a very forceful presentation of 
 these basic things often makes further argument unnec- 
 essary. Truth, clearly apprehended, argues for itself and 
 makes its o^\ti appeal. For instance, a well-kno^vn law- 
 yer argued in favor of regulating the stock exchange so as 
 to do away with certain evils. So clearly did he repre- 
 sent the evils and so simple was the exposition of his con- 
 cept of what a stock exchange ought to be that after he 
 had presented his facts and notions, but few in the au- 
 dience needed any argument to make them accept the kind 
 of remedy which he suggested. 
 
 8. Exposition and a Particular Audience 
 
 If all the people in an audience are as well-informed as 
 you on the subject and understand the terms you employ, 
 the problem of expressing your concept reduces itself to 
 a choice of the best words. Under such an ideal condi- 
 tion the various devices described in this lesson would not 
 be necessary. These methods must be used because of 
 differences between people, differences in mental stock 
 and vocabulary. The speaker has a concept and some in 
 the audience have never formed it. But they have other 
 ideas which can be called forth to help them receive the 
 new notion. Our illustrations, comparisons, and con- 
 trasts are devices whereby the speaker seeks to make the 
 minds of the hearers take in new ideas because of the 
 power which they have through the po.ssession of other 
 similar ideas. Therefore, the problem for the speaker is, 
 
GENERAL IDEAS OR CONCEPTS 225 
 
 first, to determine when a particular audience needs to 
 have the concept made clear and, second, what method of 
 elucidation is best from the standpoint of what they al- 
 ready know. It is unwise to over-explain, but on the 
 other hand the speaker should not run the risk of being 
 misunderstood. Obviously, one audience will appreciate 
 a certain kind of illustration while another audience will 
 be able to understand quite a different parallel. Notice 
 that Beecher, talking to a mixed audience, gave three par- 
 allels — one to appeal to those acquainted with govern- 
 mental affairs, one to appeal to business men, and another 
 to educate the general citizen. 
 
 It is very important when using words which express 
 essential concepts and while expounding a concept at 
 length, to watch the audience for any indications of im- 
 patience, on the one hand, or lack of understanding, on 
 the other. This is a comparatively easy task, for people 
 very clearly give signs of intelligent grasp, misunder- 
 standing, or impatience. These signs should guide the 
 speaker in the matter of further exposition. We may 
 sum up by saying, ''Watch your audience and try to make 
 the new thing clear by illustrations of like, opposite, or 
 related things which are familiar." 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 Tlic written exercises in this entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson through a second time and then 
 write your own definition of "image" and of "concept." 
 Then read the lesson again. Read also Lesson 9. 
 
 Second Bay. — Take the word "statesman" and tabulate the es- 
 sential characteristics a man must have to be classed as a 
 statesman. A good method is to select ten men who are, in 
 
226 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 your estimation, statesmen. List them. Then enumerate, 
 in two columns, their characteristics. In the first, put indi- 
 vidual and non-essential characteristics; in the second, put 
 characteristics essential to the concept "statesman." For 
 example : 
 
 Non-Essential Essential 
 Alexander Hamilton 
 
 Thomas Jefferson 
 
 Third Day. — Outline and develop orally a eulogy of some con- 
 temporary statesman Avhom you admire and, in the course 
 of your eulogy, make clear your concept of ' ' statesman ' ' and 
 show how the particular person is entitled to be included 
 in the class. (If you wish, substitute ''genius," "artist," 
 * ' musician, ' ' or any other concept the working out of which 
 will interest you.) 
 
 Fourth Day. — Write down a clear presentation of one of the 
 processes with which you come in contact in your work. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Write definitions of three of the following expres- 
 sions and give presentations of the concepts, the last sen- 
 tences of which will be the definitions you have formulated : 
 (1) Avarice; (2) humility; (3) business morality; (4) 
 fountain pen; (5) neutrality; (6) camera; (7) patriotism; 
 (8) any process with which you are familiar. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 liis knowhnlge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are siififjesticc merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. Did you ever hear a speaker use persistently a word 
 vvhicli was unfamiliar to you ? What effect did it ha /e on you 1 
 How could the evil have been remedied? 
 
 2. What is meant by "family likeness" when that expres- 
 sion is used in connection with the individuals which go to make 
 up a group? 
 
 3. What is your definition of "concept"? ^ 
 
 4. Name the three classes of general ideas classified in this"^ 
 lesson. Could you add one or more classes which are not included 
 
 in those three? 
 
 5. In the discussion of "utility," is the definition given 
 first or last? What is the advantage or disadvantage of giving 
 
 a definition first ? of givingjtj.ast ? ^ 
 
 6. What is meant by "specific illustration" as a means of 
 making a general notion clear ? What are the necessary features 
 of such an illustration? 
 
 7. After reading the exposition of the idea "charity" as 
 given by Paul, formulate your own definition of ' ' charity. ' ' 
 
 8, What purpose does contrast serve in making a concept 
 clear ? 
 
 9. Besides concrete illustration and enumeration of essen- 
 tial characteristics, what other device is of service to make a 
 concept clear ? 
 
 10. What two things must be cared for in an exposition 
 in order that the concept should be fully expressed ? 
 
 11. Why has definition been called "exposition boiledi/ 
 down"? 
 
 227 
 
228 TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 12. What are the essential features of a good, logical defi-v^' 
 nition 1 
 
 13. What is the value of clear exposition to the maker of X 
 general speeches? 
 
 14. Sum up the advice concerning the adaptation of expo- ^^ 
 sition to a particular audience. 
 
 15. Give half a dozen examples of concepts in each of the 
 three groups. 
 
 16. In which group do "chemistry," "eloquence," "sub- 
 marine," and "utility" belong! 
 
 17. Where does the subject-matter of this lesson fall in the 
 general outline or plan of this Public Speaking Course ? 
 
LESSON 13 
 
 ARGUMENTS AND THEIR PRESENTATION 
 
 Tims far we have discussed the presentation of images 
 and concepts so that the audience may be put in posses- 
 sion of them just as they exist in the mind of tlie speaker. 
 Such expressional efforts are concerned with re-creation 
 — the re-creation of particuhir mental images or general 
 notions which the speakerjias. But there is a possibility 
 that these images and concepts or combinations of them 
 as held by the speaker may be errors or perversions of 
 the truth. A very interesting book has been written by 
 Professor Miinsterberg, of Harvard University, in which 
 he gives many instances of people in court who testified 
 to certain facts and described them clearly, believing 
 them to be true, although later they were shown to be 
 false. In other words, it is one thing to represent an 
 image or idea clearly and quite another to insure its 
 truth. The promoter, selling mining stock, may paint a 
 vivid picture of extensive and successful operations, but 
 he may not be able to demonstrate the actual existence 
 of such a mine anywhere save in his own fertile imagina- 
 tion. Besides particular and general ideas, we also form 
 opinions or judgments which likewise may be clearly 
 presented, but which also will need defense as to truth 
 and acceptability. 
 
 If you were to paint a word picture of a wonderful 
 mine and your audience were to accept it as existing just 
 as you describe it, there would be no need for you to 
 take precautions to g-uarantee the actual existence of the 
 mine. If you were to expound the process of ore extrac- 
 229 
 
230 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 tion used in the mine and it were accepted as a true ex- 
 position, there would be no need of demonstration. If 
 you were to express the opinion that such a mine operated 
 in such a manner would be a good enterprise in which 
 to invest and the audience were to understand and adopt 
 the opinion, there would be no practical advantage in 
 showing them just wdiy the opinion is a justifiable one. 
 But often it is necessary not only to present but also to 
 justify and defend. Such an operation we call an arg-u- 
 ment. Thus far we have discussed the presentation of 
 percepts and concepts; before taking up the details of 
 argumentation, we shall treat the clear presentation of 
 judgments. 
 
 1. A Judgment and its Statement 
 
 Our experiences throughout life lead us to link things 
 together in various relations. Thus we say, ''Apples are 
 sweet," placing apples in a class relation with all other 
 sw^eet things. We have our ideas of what things are 
 good, bad, or indifferent. We may come to the conclu- 
 sion that "The tariff is a benefit to the country." This 
 means that w^e deliberately place the tariff among the 
 things good for our country. Such a conclusion is a 
 judgment. A judgment always includes two or more 
 things and a definite relation between them. It is a belief 
 which we form deliberately; it is an opinion. When 
 stated, such a belief, opinion, or judgment always takes 
 the form of a proposition. The following are typical 
 propositions : 
 
 1. Labor unions are beneficial to the community as a 
 whole. 
 
 2. A college education is of value as a preparation for 
 business. 
 
 3. Private owncrshi]) of land is justifiable. 
 
ARGUMENTS AND PRESENTATION 231 
 
 4. Political parties are necessary in a democracy. 
 
 5. John Smith is an honest man. 
 
 Notice that between things a relationship is stated 
 which may or may not turn out to exist. Sometimes the 
 relationship is stated as one which ought to exist, thus : 
 
 1 . The United States should grant self-government to 
 the Filipinos. 
 
 2. Railroads should be required to publish annual re- 
 ports of the physical value of their property. 
 
 3. The President of the United States should b(; 
 elected for a term of six years and be ineligible for a 
 second nomination. 
 
 In each of these cases, the expresser of the proposition 
 has one thing clearly in mind (say, labor unions) and 
 another (things beneficial to the community) and he 
 affirms a close relationship. The student might here say 
 that when one forms a concept, he also relates a number 
 of things so as to come to a grasp of their common or 
 class features. That is indeed true, but the total product 
 — the concept or general notion — is built up gradually 
 and almost unconsciously; certainly the thinker is not 
 aware of the steps. Many, many experiences with par- 
 ticular apples of various sizes, shapes, colors, and flavors 
 make us gradually get a notion of what constitutes apples 
 in general. In the case of the judgment, however, the 
 related thoughts are constantly kept in mind, each sep- 
 arate from the other and compared. We select one 
 notion (as tariff) and another (national welfare) and, 
 after carefully inspecting them, we say that they are or 
 are not related thus and so ; we form the judginent delib- 
 erately and state the result in the form of a proposition. 
 
 These propositions may record relationships which do 
 exist, have existed, or will or should exist between two 
 things. If the proposition clearly presents the relation- 
 ship which the speaker has in mind, then we say that 
 
232 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the opinion has been clearly expressed. ^Tiether we 
 accept it or not, if we understand it, the expression has 
 been clear. 
 
 If the speaker feels that his opinion is not understood, 
 how shall he elaborate its plain statement so as to make 
 it clear ? In such a case, the amplification will consist of 
 a proper exposition of the notions included in the prop- 
 osition. For instance, "tariff" is taken up and pre- 
 sented according to the rules already laid down for the 
 expression of concepts. The same is done with "national 
 welfare." If one of the terms of the proposition is par- 
 ticular and not general, present it like any other image. 
 After the speaker has obtained a clear grasp of his prop- 
 osition, the next step is to verify it so that the audienc(^ 
 will accept it because they see that the steps by which it 
 was reached were reasonable steps. 
 
 2. Why Opinions Need Verification or 
 Demonstration 
 
 Our minds are filled with a multitude of beliefs which 
 have come to us through various channels. Some of them 
 are very trustworthy because we have made them care- 
 fully after investigating all the related facts. But others 
 are unreliable, having grown up through prejudice or 
 haphazard misinformation. For instance, a mechanic 
 can tell you just what style of machine is best for a cer- 
 tain kind of work. His judgment here is good ; he has 
 had direct experience with machines ; he has tested all 
 the parts and has no more reason to lean in one direction 
 in his fiual judgment than in another. You could not 
 fool him al)out machines and if he expressed the proposi- 
 tion, "Machine B is better than machine A," he could 
 give good and sufficient reasons for it. Yet that same 
 man, with next to no trustworthy knowledge of politics, 
 
ARGIT:\IEXT8 and PRESENTATIOX 233 
 
 government, or economics will firmly liokl to the belief 
 that the Republican Party is l)etter than the Democratic, 
 or vice versa. He may have the merest hearsay informa- 
 tion about the parties, yet he has formed an opinion 
 which he does not hesitate to put forth as a projjosition. 
 Ai^ain, we often say, "I believe this or that man is a 
 fraud," when we have no foundation for the opinion 
 beyond some peculiarity in his speech or appearance. 
 In short, opinions which we hold and act upon are of 
 varying degrees of trustworthiness. Whenever a speaker 
 feels that his opinion is not accepted by his hearers or 
 when he wishes them to accept an opinion which is 
 acceptable only when known "from the ground up," he 
 undertakes to verify all that led to his conclusions; he 
 undertakes to establish his opinions by argnment. 
 
 3. SouECEs OF Opinions Which Should be Tested. 
 
 There are two general sources of material from which 
 we make our beliefs : (1) directly observed facts and (2) 
 inferences or actions of the mind. Let us illustrate. 
 Suppose you and I are in a room and, while you are at 
 the table writing, I look out the window and see that the 
 ground is wet. I say to you, "The ground is wet." I 
 am reporting a fact, something with which I come into 
 very direct contact and which I know, because my eyes 
 see it. Or again, let us suppose that it is dark and I 
 cannot see well, but I put my hand out on the sill and 
 say, "The sill is wet." Again I report a fact, for my 
 hands touch the water and I trust my sense of touch as 
 well as my sense of sight. Anything which comes to me 
 through the report of my senses I believe exists and I 
 accept as a fact. Now we can define a fact as knowledge 
 luhich a normal person gains through the use of normal 
 sense organs under favorable conditions for observation. 
 
 Sui)pose, after saying to you, "The ground is wet," 
 
234 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 I also say, "Tlie sky is clear." You accept my reports 
 and say, "Then, it has been raining." Here is a belief 
 which 5^ou express and which I also accept, though neither 
 of us directly observed the rain as it fell and as it ceased 
 to iail. So often have w^e seen tlie ground wet after 
 rain that the wet ground leads us to infer that it has been 
 raining. In this case, a fact is observed and its cause 
 inferred. Now I hold the belief that it has been raining 
 just as well as I hold the belief that the ground is wet; 
 one opinion is based on fact and the other is based on 
 inference. 
 
 Let us give yet another illustration. A traveler on a 
 lonely road finds a man lying dead with a bullet-hole in 
 his head and a revolver with one chamber empty by his 
 side. He truly accepts these facts which he gets by 
 observation, but he also believes that the man committed 
 suicide. 
 
 Opinions rest upon two things, observed facts and 
 inferences of the mind. If these sources are not drawn 
 on carefully and with proper safeguards, our opinions 
 are likely to be untrustworthy. A critical listener, to 
 whom we are addressing an argument, will not accept 
 our propositions unless we make it clear that the sources 
 were consulted thoroughly and discreetly. But, you 
 might say, "How could anyone be mistaken about a 
 fact?" Very easily, through faulty observation. Often, 
 when the light is poor we think we see things which do 
 not exist or which exist in a very different character 
 under good illumination. So, also, inferences may be 
 fallacious. In the cas(> of the rain inference just given, 
 an error might exist, for i lie ground could be wet be- 
 cause someone sprinkled it, just as well as it could be 
 wet from rain. The suicide inference would have been 
 M wrong one if tlu' <l(\nd man had been murdered. An 
 argument, to convince, must clearly present the facts 
 
ARGrMKNTS AXl) PRESENTATION 235 
 
 and inforoiiccs wliieli lead to tlio proposition to be proved, 
 and it must sliow that tbey are all acceptable so far as 
 careful investigation can make tbeni. Of course, we all 
 know that a popular man can often get bis opinion 
 accepted merely because the crowd likes liim and will 
 agree witli anything he says, or an unscrupulous man 
 may play upon prejudices so as to get an opinion 
 accepted without rigorous demonstration; but we wish 
 to show how a proposition may be made acceptable on its 
 own merits or because it is the r-easonable conclusion to 
 be drawn from trustworthy facts and inferences. 
 
 4. H&w AN Opinion is Built Up 
 
 Let us suppose that as an American, reading the vari- 
 ous papers and discussing current topics, you had formed 
 an opinion of the Irish Home Rule situation as it loomed 
 up in the early part of 1914. A bill giving Ireland home 
 rule was presented to Parliament, whereupon the influ- 
 ential people in Ulster, a northern county of Ireland, 
 said that if such a bill were passed, Ulster preferred to be 
 retained under the British rule and not included in the 
 Irish government, as provided for in the bill. After 
 gathering all the facts possible, you formed a number of 
 opinions somewhat as follows : 
 
 1. The interests of the people of Ulster are more 
 bound up with Great Britain than with the rest of Ire- 
 land. 
 
 2. Under British rule Ulster has prospered. 
 
 3. Under Irish rule her prosperity would be dimin- 
 ished. 
 
 4. To include her under a general Irish government 
 would result in continued civil war. 
 
 Each of these propositions sums up a particular field 
 of the whole discussion, and, if all of them are accepted, 
 
236 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 tliey in turn will lead 3^ou to infer a wider belief aonie- 
 what as follows : It would be to the interests of Ulstei- 
 to be exempted from the provisions of the Irish Honn' 
 Rule Bill. 
 
 Now if you w^ere to state this as a proposition to some- 
 one else and should want to defend it, your first ste]) 
 might be to say the proposition was a tenable one becaus(\ 
 first, the interests of the people of Ulster are more boun( I 
 up with those of Great Britain than w^ith the rest of Ire 
 land, and so on dow^n through the four reasons. 
 
 But just as your main proposition is supported by th<' 
 less wide propositions from which it is logically inferred, 
 so each of these in turn may have still more minute rea 
 sons as supports. Taking item 1 you might offer the 
 f ollow^ing supports : 
 
 (a) Eacially Ulstermen are English and Scotcli 
 rather than Irish. 
 
 (b) In religion, Ulstermen are Protestant rather than 
 Catholic like the rest of Ireland. 
 
 (c) In temperament, Ulstermen are like the Scotch 
 rather than the other Irishmen. 
 
 (d) In business, thej^ are allied with the commercial 
 and manufacturing- interests of Great Britain rather 
 than with the small farming of the rest of Ireland. 
 
 (e) Past history shows that there has been continual 
 strife between Ulster and the rest of Ireland, while there 
 has been sympathy with England. 
 
 But the further you go, the more evident it becomes 
 that you must offer some facts to sui)port your state- 
 ments. To support the notion that Ulstermen are racially 
 different from those of southern Ireland you say: "Due 
 to difficulties wdth the people of Ireland, James I, in 1610 
 sent over a colony of English and Scotch settlers to 
 Ulster. These people were favored by the English 
 e-overnment and thrived. But the rest of Ii-(^lnnd was 
 
ARGUMENTS AND PRP^SENTATION 287 
 
 I'obellioiis agahist tlio Eiiglisli g-ovcnmient and liated 
 the men of Ulster. Indeed, in 1641, six thousand of the 
 Ulstermen were massacred. There was retaliation and 
 the consequent bitterness kept the two peoples apart. A 
 comparison of names will show that the original blood, 
 Scotch and English, predominates in Ulster, different 
 from the Celtic blood in the rest of Ireland." 
 
 To support the second statement, about religion, you 
 would have to give the census reports showing the great 
 predominance of Protestants in Ulster and the over- 
 whelming majority of Catholics in the rest of Ireland. 
 And so on down, all inferences w^ould be given their fact 
 supports. You have not gotten to the bottom until your 
 reasons rest upon (1) competently observed facts and 
 (2) opinions which are generally accepted. Even this 
 last should be properly checked up by observed facts. 
 
 5. Example of Suppokt 
 
 Note the following brief argument. It might be out- 
 lined somewhat as follows : 
 
 The United States should grant Cuba reciprocity. 
 
 1. Because w^e have guaranteed to establish a strong 
 
 government in the islands. 
 
 2. Because a strong government can be maintained only 
 
 through commercial prosperity. 
 
 3. Because reciprocity will secure commercial prosperity. 
 
 la) It will give Cuba a needed market for sugar. 
 
 4. Because our industries will not suifer from this. 
 
 (a) Our markets need not only our own supply of 
 
 'sugar, but also Cuba's and more. 
 
 (b) This is true in all industries as well as the 
 
 sugar industry. 
 This argument might well be foUoAved by an altruistic 
 and patriotic appeal. 
 
238 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 THE CUBAN PROBLEM 
 (1903) 
 
 During an existence in which it lias met many crises and solved 
 many diplomatic problems, the United States has acquired a repu- 
 tation for expediency, sagacity, and integrity. It is now con- 
 sidering a problem the solution of which will mar or strengthen 
 that reputation. Our nation has assumed the responsibility of 
 establishing peace, and inaugurating a stable and independent 
 government in the Island of Cuba. Peace has been established, 
 and independence has indeed been granted to Cuba ; but a strong 
 government there has yet to be organized. 
 
 In order to found a solid government the Cubans must thrive 
 commercially. The sugar trade is their main source of income, 
 ^lost of the Island's population is engaged in the production 
 of siigar, and the livelihood of the people is dependent upon the 
 profitable sale of sugar. Hence, we look to that industry for 
 Cuba's commercial prosperity. The present condition of the 
 sugar market, however, makes it impossible for her dealers to 
 sell at all with profit. The markets of the world, if not con- 
 trolled by home industries, protected by tariff, are controlled by 
 the great sugar "Kartel" syndicate, fostered by bounties from 
 the German government. Cuba's merchants cannot underbid 
 such powerful rivals. 
 
 Confronted with this dilemma, the Cuban planters have peti- 
 tioned Congress to grant reciprocity to the Island. Without a 
 doubt, such a measure would greatly relieve Cuba's financial dis- 
 tress. But an objection to this remedy has been raised on the 
 ground that it would relieve Cuba only at the expense of home 
 enterprises, that any lowering of the tariff on sugar would kill 
 our beet sugar industry in its infancy. Let us investigate this 
 standpoint. The United States consumes about 2,400,000 tons 
 of sugar per year. The total sugar product of the L"'^nited States. 
 Hawaii, and Porto Rico is 850.000 tons. So after using all our 
 domestic supply, we yet need 1,550,000 tons. Cuba's output last 
 year was 850,000 tons. Thus, if we should buy all her sugar, we 
 should still lack 700,000 tons per year. Surely a country demand- 
 ing 700,000 tons is ample field for development for the Ix'd 
 sugar industry, producing at present but 150.000 tons. 
 
 Objecticms have been raised by other industries. Neverthe- 
 less, on investigation, it is evident that what they desire for 
 development far exceeds what they refjuire. Beyond what is 
 honestly necessary, we should not consider ourselves in reliev- 
 ing Cuba. AVilh a third of her men dead, her women in itiourn- 
 iiig. and liei- children orphans. Cuba should truly excite our 
 
ARGUMENTS AND PRESENTATION 239 
 
 compassion. Her restoration to peace and liappiness Avill mark 
 the noblest results of a righteous war. Her prosperity will l)e 
 a vindication of our national honor. Give Cuba the means 
 wliereby she can prosper, and our solemn pledge will be fulfilled. 
 The victory at Manila will have received its reward, the heroes 
 of Santiago will not have died in vain, and a just Providence 
 will surely reward the United States with its benediction of pros- 
 perity and peace. 
 
 Wliich of the statements in this ar^ment were not 
 supported by facts! Would the argument have been 
 nu)re convincing if the facts liad been given? 
 
 6. Acceptable Facts 
 
 No doubt the student can see that if an opinion is to 
 be demonstrated "from the ground up," the speaker 
 must present the foundational facts which must ulti- 
 mately support his whole superstructure of inferences. 
 There nrast be no doubt about the acceptability of such 
 facts; consequently every precaution must be taken to 
 insure their reliability. We shall now explain the most 
 important considerations which must be kept in mind 
 w hen passing upon alleged facts. 
 
 First, however, we must modify our definition of fact 
 somewhat. There are not only physical facts, such as 
 Ave have already defined, which are ascertained through 
 the use of the sense organs; but there are also mental 
 facts of which one becomes aware by looking within his 
 own mind. 
 
 The material facts can be observed by any number of 
 people, but mental facts can be directly observed or 
 experienced by one person only. A mental fact is any 
 psychological state or experience. Thus, you say, "I was 
 afraid." You are reporting a state which actually 
 existed, but which only you were in a position to observe 
 directly. Of course, someone else, knowing the circum- 
 
240 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 stance wliicli might reasona])ly frighten you, or observ^ 
 ing the expression on your face, could well say, ''Yes, he 
 was afraid"; but he would not be reporting a direct ob- 
 servation of your state of mind. His conclusion would be 
 an inference from facts which he did observe, namely, a 
 number of circumstances and the expression of your 
 face. These two kinds of facts, mental and material, 
 form the basis of all knowledge, the foundation of all 
 scientific truth, and the material for all thought not in- 
 cluded in the unrational realm of faith. 
 
 Consequently, a fact is anything which exists in the 
 world and knowledge of which we gain through the most 
 immediate contact possible. We may define an inference 
 as knowledge which we accept as true because of trust- 
 worthy mental operations beyond the direct observation 
 of facts. 
 
 7. Witnesses 
 
 Whether a fact which we use in argument be external 
 and physical or internal and mental, someone must be 
 its witness and report its existence to others. Before 
 accepting the fact as actually existing in the form re- 
 ported, we make sure of certain things concerning the 
 witness and the observation. 
 
 1. Was the Avitness competent to make the observa- 
 tion? 
 
 2. Were conditions favorable to accurate observa- 
 tion? 
 
 ."). Is the observer telling exactly what he observed, or 
 is he misrepresenting? 
 
 (1) Competence of the Wifnes.9 
 
 It is obvious that a deaf man is not a reliable witness 
 to a conversation, nor is a blind man likely to make 
 accurate i-eports concerning colors. Neither is provided 
 
ARGUMENTS AND PRESENTATION 241 
 
 with adequate, physical means of perception. So, also, a 
 scientist equipped with a poor microscope or no micro- 
 scope at all is less able to make correct observations 
 concerning cell-structure than a fellow investigator who 
 uses a modern, high-power instrument. Between the 
 two extremes, total incapacity because of physical defect 
 and maxinmm efficiency through normal sense organs 
 extended to their highest potentiality by instruments for 
 accurate observation, witnesses vary in physical and 
 mental competence. 
 
 If you are arguing that the temi3erature of a certain 
 health resort never varies more than ten degrees above or 
 below 68 F., you may offer as fact support a temperature 
 record for each day over a period of three years, made by 
 the clerk of the local drug store. Any normal person is 
 capable of observing a thermometer and recording the 
 readings. But suppose the argument should be that a 
 particular food should be excluded from the markets, 
 under a Pure Food ruling, because the consumption of a 
 reasonable amount of it would bring about the consump- 
 tion of more than three-tenths of a gram of saccharin a 
 day. All accept the ruling of the Pure Food Bureau of 
 Chemistry that saccharin may be injurious and you say 
 that three-tenths of a gram, as set by the Board of 
 Referees, is the danger point. Does the particular food 
 contain more than the safe quantity of saccharin in a 
 day's ration! The facts must be ascertained by very 
 delicate observation. A chemist, besides having other 
 qualifications, must be equipped with apparatus which 
 will enable him not only to detect the presence of sac- 
 charin but also to determine the exact quantity in a given 
 sample. 
 
 You strengthen the facts which you yourself offer in 
 evidence if you show the physical capability of your wit- 
 ness, and you may attack the fact support of an opponent 
 
242 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 by revealing sliortcomiiigs of liis witnesses in this re- 
 spect. 
 
 Besides physical competence, there is mental compe- 
 tence. The most general weakness here is the simple 
 fault in memory. If time elapses between the observation 
 and the report, certain things are often forgotten, some 
 become obscure, the order of succession is not remem- 
 bered, and there is a tendency to substitute what ought 
 logically to have taken place or what would be desirable 
 to have taken place instead of what was actually ob- 
 served on the spot. The possibility of weakness in the 
 memory of a witness is usually suggested by contradictory 
 testimony by another witness. If it can be shown that 
 one has a generally poor memory while the other is nor- 
 mal or exceptionally good, other things being equal, we 
 accept the report of the second. 
 
 Another mental point to be considered may w^ell be 
 called payflcular expertnes.s in a certain kind of observa- 
 tion. Often at a basket ball game, the umpire or referee 
 sees a play not noticed by most of the spectators. Of 
 course, this may be due partially to superior eyesight, 
 but usually such skill is mental rather than physical. 
 Much experience in making one kind of observations 
 makes the mind quick to co-operate with the eye. The 
 same chord may strike the ear of a musical genius and 
 tliat of an ordinary man with perfectly good hearing, 
 yet the musician will say that this is not one sound but a 
 combination of such and such separate sounds. The dif- 
 ference is mental, for a little ])ractice will enable the 
 other man, under proper directions, to disting-uish the 
 hidden tones also. 
 
 In many scientific and economic ai'guments, we have 
 to depend upon the report of expert observers of facts. 
 This does not mean that we accept the opinions or con- 
 clusions of these experts without (juestion; it simply 
 
ARGUMENTS AND PRESENTATION 243 
 
 means that we recognize that a man who has been ob- 
 serving in a certain fiekl a great deal, is better able to 
 see what actually exists there than one who has not had 
 that particular kind of experience. In other Avords, prac- 
 tice makes perfect in observation. 
 
 If a witness can be shown to be temporarily or perma- 
 nently abnormal or subnormal mentally, his report of 
 facts may be discredited. Recently in New York, a gay 
 party returning from a cafe undertook to run the ele- 
 vator of the apartment in which some of them lived. As 
 a result one person was killed. None of the others could 
 give a clear account of how the accident took place. 
 Each, furthermore, had a different version. Temporary 
 abnormality may be due to liquor, drugs, intense fatigue 
 (example of the overworked engineer who cannot tell a 
 red from a green signal), shock, etc. Permanent mental 
 aberration ranges all the way from insanity, through 
 hallucination, to minor peculiarities. 
 
 (2) Conditions of Observation 
 
 There are often external conditions which hamper cor- 
 rect observation. Every one knows that it is unwise to 
 buy a suit of clothes under artificial light, for what 
 looked like a quiet, navy blue may, in the sunlight, turn 
 out to be an embarrassing purple or sky blue. Not only 
 do poor lighting, mist fog, obstructions, and other fixed, 
 external conditions interfere with observation, but chang- 
 ing circumstances, such as general confusion and a rapid 
 succession of events, also cause inaccuracy. An example 
 of this last is found in the Fourth of July pinwheel which 
 looks like a circle of fire when in reality it is a single spot 
 of light revolving rapidly. 
 
 Not only does movement of the thing observed cause 
 confusion, but haste in movement on the part of the 
 observer will do the same thing. An investigating com- 
 
244 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 mittee- visited the schools of Xew York City and handed 
 in a severe report. The report was subsequently dis- 
 credited by many because of alleged errors arising from 
 the fact that the critics were mal-obser\'ers, through 
 haste. Similar to this is the error likely to arise when a 
 report is gotten up concerning facts spread over a wide 
 field which is to be covered by an inadequate number of 
 investigators. 
 
 (S) Credibility of the Witness 
 
 In popular arguments or discussions of a non-technical 
 character, it is not so much the capability of the witness 
 which is open to question as^ v< it his credibility or truth- 
 fulness. There is usually litth- doubt that an ordinary 
 person may be able to record the quantity of imports or 
 exports or transmit the testimony in a congressional 
 investigation; 1ml lli'i<' i> (itt<]i luirM^rtainty concerning 
 the intent of a iiiaii to t(,'ll the truth or to pervert it to 
 suit his own interests. Especially in political arguments 
 do we find reports of alleged facts discredited because 
 the source of information is looked upon as generally 
 corrupt and iimiioral. There are two things which may 
 tlirow doubt upon the credibilits" of a witness: (1) a gen- 
 eral reputation for unreliability and (2) the existence of 
 a special motive to roprcsont things in a certain way 
 whether they are so oi- not. 
 
 It must be remembered that weakness of general, moral 
 character (even when establisjied) is not proof positive 
 tliat a man's statement of fact is deliberately falsified. 
 Such a flaw merely raises a doubt. The doubt is strength- 
 ened if other witnesses, of better character, disagi'ee with 
 the testimony. In all cases where general character is 
 not satisfactory, it is not only safe but also fair to hold 
 the testimony in suspension rather tlian to reject it alto- 
 gether. If a careful investigation, employing all known 
 
ak(;i;mI':nts and i'Rkskntatiox -mo 
 
 IckIh and HalV/^uards, I'ailK to r('vcal niiHrcprcrtcrilaiioii, 
 Wk'U IIjc had ('IiuvacU'V of tlic wilncsK is not Kuniciciii 
 ground in ifsclf Tor tlic discardin;^ of llic t<',s1ini(>My. 
 
 Soiii('1in)<'.s v.c liiid a special iiiolixc or reason I'or a 
 man lo twist liis \(\)<>v\ in lliis or llial dircelion. Il is 
 well luKAvn ilial c.oi'iJoratioDK uscmJ to make I'alsi; cnti-ics 
 in IlK'ir hooks lo hide exccKsivc! f>rofi1s, ^riic rrxxlern 
 practice oj' (M>r{)ora1ioj)s to o\'ej-(;aj>itali/>e is similac in 
 some rcKpects. It is to Die jntei-cst oi' sncli concerns lo 
 sliow a Kteady, reaKonahle fji-ofi1 rallx-r than fln<'1 nalin;^- 
 or extrenx'ly hi^li returns. I^'inancial i-easons, r<'asons 
 o)' lionor arxl re[>ulalion, and many olljers, sorrx'limes a(;t 
 as sfX'ciaJ irx-enlives for a man lo c.oticcnl or misrepres<'n1 
 I'acts. 
 
 A si>ecial moli\'e j'oj- j'nise lesl il'yinj^- does not neces- 
 sarily (;ast a slion;^*')- douhl llian general dishonesty 
 Ufx>n an assertion of I'acl, ])]i\, it doeh, ;_'i\<' ;i ch-arer itxii 
 cation of the djj-ecti(jn ol" the lalsilication. W'e know 
 that a real estale a^^'ent want- all the facts ahont a dis- 
 tiict he is Ixxnnin^ to he favorahie lo health, hiiHirxjKK 
 j>ros[X'rity, and KO(;ial hapfnrx'KK. Jf he misrepresentK, 
 it njust he in tix* <lir<'ction of exa^^'eratinji^ vood points. 
 A rival a^<'nt, interested in f>lot I^, would misrej>j-esei)t 
 f)lot A in tlx? direction of had [>oints. A thoron^li iuves- 
 ti^alion njay kIjow tjjat a man is telling tlj<' trulli for 
 itK own Hake uninfluenced hy the call of his own sfX'cial 
 inUtntHiH; hut whcro a Hpociaj ii)t<;rcKt is sIionmi, we are 
 f)articularly careful to investigate the facts suhmitterj. 
 
 8. J*'JNAJ. SrOfiKSriONS ('oNCKHNINO THK AceKI'l Al',ll-n V 
 
 OF Facts 
 
 Facts may he directly ohserv<'d hy you, yourself, or 
 
 Ihey may \)(t re[>orte(J to you hy ollx'rs, The testimony 
 
 of others may reach you through Hpee(;h, letter, or [xjhlic 
 
 fjrint. In all tlx-se latter cases you must not only test tlx* 
 
246 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 facts as you understand tliem but you must be as sure 
 as possible that you liave gathered the observer's exact 
 meaning, that the language difficulty has not stood in the 
 way of an appreciation of exactly what he wanted to put 
 on record — that and nothing else. To these facts, as well 
 as those of your own observation, apply the tests already 
 mentioned. 
 
 Facts gain in acceptability if several observers make 
 the same report or if no one testifies to the contrary. Of 
 course, in the case of mental facts only one person is in 
 a position to make a direct observation; his testimony 
 Avill depend upon his credibility and the extent to which 
 his reported experience was verified by his subsequent 
 acts as observed by others. 
 
 If you get the habit of patience" and care in checking 
 up the capability and credibility of each observer of a 
 fact you accept, as well as the conditions of observation, 
 your opinions will rest upon firm foundations and your 
 arguments to convince others will be strong. 
 
 9. The Gathering of Facts 
 
 If you are interested in arguments concerning topics 
 which stretch beyond the limits of daily, personal con- 
 tact, you will have to gather facts by reading. It is well 
 for every student of speech-making to know the stand- 
 ard places of reference. 
 
 I. ENCYCLOPEDIAS such as the Britannica, the Neiv 
 International, Nelson's, and the CatJiolic, give facts con- 
 cerning most things of importance and dispute. Further- 
 more, articles in those sources usually contain a list of 
 books which may be consulted for fuller and more de- 
 tailed treatment of a topic. Such bibliographies are 
 usually most trustworthy and include only the best works. 
 
 TI. GENERAL CATALOGUES of tlic books iu tho libraries 
 you frequent will enalih^ you to make a list of the avail- 
 
ARGUMENTS AND PRESENTATION 247 
 
 able books on tlio subject you are looking up. It is well 
 to read the table of contents of all the books you can get 
 before undertaking a careful study of any one. 
 
 III. MAGAZINE LITERATURE Is exceedingly well indexed 
 in Poole's Index, The Reader's Guide, and The Annual 
 Library Index. In these places we are put on the track 
 not only of the latest contributions to a current discus- 
 sion, but also some of the best writings on various topics, 
 which are not to be found in book form. 
 
 IV. YEAR BOOKS sucli as the New International, the 
 American Year Book, and the Annual Register, give brief 
 but trustworthy accounts of the events of a particular 
 year. Such sources are valuable primarily because they 
 put you on the track of more detailed accounts to be 
 found and verified elsewhere. 
 
 ■V. REPORTS of a special character and government 
 DOCUMENTS also are valuable, especially in economic or 
 political discussions. 
 
 Eemember, however, wherever you find your facts, 
 to apply to them the tests of acceptability. No man is 
 infallible and errors may originate even close to the seats 
 of the mighty. 
 
 It is not honest to yourself or to your audience to form 
 and give out opinions when you have not made sure of 
 the facts upon which they rest. It is certain that you will 
 fail to convince an audience if you are not in a position 
 to produce the facts when necessary. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exercises in this entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson twice carefii%; then take a maga- 
 zine article and underline every opinion expressed which is 
 not adequately supported by facts. 
 
248 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Second Day. — Select one of the followiug opinions and support 
 it by two or more subordinate opinions as indicated on i^ipcs 
 235 and 236 of this lesson, in connection with the Irish 
 Home Rule question. Then write down the actual facts 
 you know in support of the minor opinions. 
 
 1. The influx of foreign labor into the Ignited States is 
 detrimental to the welfare of American labor. ' 
 
 2. Tlie influx of labor into the United States is a desir- 
 able economic force for prosperity. 
 
 3. Judges should be subject to recall by direct vote of 
 the people. 
 
 4. The United States should increase its army and navy. 
 
 5. The United States should diminish its armed forces 
 and work for neutrality agreements. 
 
 6. The Single Tax is (or is not) desirable for the United 
 States. 
 
 7. The IMonroe Doctrine is of more harm than good to 
 our interests as a nation. 
 
 8. The United States should relinquish all colonial pos- 
 sessions. 
 
 9. A national Prohibition Law is desirable. 
 
 10. All institutions of learning, from kindergarten to uni- 
 versity professional school, should be conducted free to stu- 
 dents l)y the government. 
 
 Third and. Fourth Bays. — Carefully formulate and write down 
 an opinion you hold on some current problem or national 
 polic3^ Then go to the nearest library and make the most 
 complete list you can of the available books, reports, and 
 articles on the subject. After making your bibliography, 
 begin to read up on the subject, taking notes as you read. 
 
 /•'////( Day. — Continue your reading and note-taking. Then 
 write down a series of facts gathered from the reading, 
 noting the name of the witness in each case and the accept- 
 ability of the facts. Use the following form. 
 
 PACTS WITNESSES ACCEPTAIHLITY 
 
 Note the facts Note names of Enumerate here : 
 
 in this column witnesses (a) General reputation 
 
 (b) Special interests 
 
 (c) Ability — mental 
 
 and physical 
 
 (d) Circumstances of 
 
 observation 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are ,<iiicigesfirc merely, dealing largely with tlie practical 
 application of the principles, and are to he placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. Did you ever hear a speaker whose vivid presentation 
 sfrnek you as good, but who never took the trouble to demon- 
 strate the acceptability of what he presented? How do you feel 
 when listening- to such a man? Do you doubt his honesty? 
 
 2. What is the difference between representation and 
 
 (Iciiionstration? 
 
 3. Give a definition of argumentation. 
 
 4. What are the main features of a judgment? 
 
 5. W'hat is a proposition? 
 
 6. Why do opinions need verification ? 
 
 7. What are the two processes by which we arrive at 
 opinions? 
 
 S. WHiat is meant by a fact ? What is an inference ? 
 
 9. In what ways can an opinion be supported? AVhat is 
 the nature of the final or ultimate support of an opinion? 
 
 10. Do you know any "generally accepted opinion," that 
 is, a belief held by all without any question? 
 
 11. AVhat is a mental fact? Who may witness such a fact? 
 
 12. Wliat three things must be checked up to insure the 
 acceptability of a fact? 
 
 13. Can you give an example of a physically incompetent 
 v.itness? of a mentally incompetent witness? 
 
 14. Why is it difficult to get witnesses of a railroad acci- 
 dent or a theater panic to agree in their accounts of the facts f 
 
 249 
 
250 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 15. "What two features must be eonsiderod in passing on a 
 man's credibility ? 
 
 16. Do you reject facts because they are rei)orted by a 
 witness of low morals? 
 
 17. What are the generally recognized sources of published 
 facts? 
 
LESSON 14 
 
 INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS 
 
 In our last lesson, we dwelt upon the importance of 
 facts as foundational to all arguments. In this lesson, 
 we shall consider the types of reasoning — the logical 
 workings of the mind beyond the direct observation of 
 facts. Yet, at the very threshold of our study of reason- 
 ing, we must once more insist that the most valuable 
 asset of the argumentative speaker is a wide and accm-ate 
 gi'asp of facts ; no amount of skill in logic, no amount of 
 cunning in the construction of arguments can take the 
 place of trustworthy facts. Indeed, dialectic facility, 
 without a mastery of facts, produces only an empty shell 
 of pretense. On the other hand, a knowledge of facts 
 usually insures clear "reasoning, for the human mind has 
 a normal tendency to formulate correct opinions if it is 
 provided with the proper materials of thought. 
 
 Yet there is need for the public speaker to understand 
 the fundamental principles of reasoning and to master 
 all types of argument. In this lesson we shall consider 
 the two great classes of inferences or reasoning processes, 
 the inductive and the deductive. 
 
 Induction- 
 
 Just as it is natural for the mind to form general 
 notions or concepts after perceiving many objects of a 
 similar character, so it is natural for it to formulate 
 general laws deliberately. For example, you throw a 
 stone up in the air and it falls to the ground ; you toss 
 up a ball and it falls to earth; the stem of an apple on 
 
 251 
 
252 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 the tree breaks and tlie apple drops; the wind raises 
 the knaves only that 'they may once more return to their 
 resting place. Observing all these things, you infer a 
 general law to the effect that "Whatever goes up must 
 come down." Or, if you are more careful in your state- 
 ment, you say, ''All bodies, when raised in the air and 
 left unsupported, fall to the earth." If you are very 
 scientific, you w^ill time the various falling bodies and get 
 a law somewhat as follows: "All interfering agencies 
 being eliminated, a body falls sixteen feet during the 
 first second, another sixteen and an additional thirty- 
 two the second second, still another sixteen and an 
 additional sixty-four the third second, and so on." More 
 briefly your law will be : "A falling object drops sixteen 
 feet during the first second and has the velocity of its 
 fall increased every second by thirty-two feet over the 
 velocity of the preceding second." Each of these prop- 
 ositions states in more or less complete form, an inductive 
 inference. This inference is the general opinion which 
 you form because of a number of facts which have come 
 under your observation. 
 
 The simplest kind of induction is known as the perfect 
 induction. It consists merely of making a general state- 
 ment concerning all the cases of a certain sort observed, 
 when the number of such cases is limited and you are 
 sure you have observed them all. For instance, you 
 might say, "All the countries of South America which 
 gained their independence adopted the Republican form 
 of government." The induction is perfect or complete 
 1)ecause there is no possibility that any case could have 
 escaped observation. Such inductions are usually 
 correct. If the observations hav3 been made carefully 
 the possibility of error is very slight. 
 
 But the imperfect induction is another matter. Take 
 the example concerning falling bodies, just olTcrcd. 
 
TYPES OF ARGU:\rEXT 25r5 
 
 Obviously no man or group of men can succeed in observ- 
 ing every falling body or every Cody left in the air 
 unsupported. Only a great many cases can be observed. 
 But since all of these act in a certain identical way, we 
 infer that all bodies (these and others) will continue to 
 act in the same way under similar circumstances. As we 
 have said, the tendency to generalize is a human trait. 
 We may now say that a very small number of cases and 
 often a single case, will be sufficient to suggest a general 
 law. 
 
 A village gossip noses out some scandal about a 
 particular preacher and then says, ''All preachers are 
 rascally hypocrites." The impulse to make this gen- 
 eralization is natural, but to hold to it without further 
 investigation is hasty judgment. If the gossip should 
 get similar damaging evidence against three or four 
 more clergymen, he would be more justified in his 
 inference, but even then the generalization from the 
 particular cases at hand would be hasty. Assuming that 
 every minister cannot be looked up and examined, a 
 generalization concerning the whole group must be made 
 with care and subjected to certain checks and tests. We 
 shall discuss these precautionary safeguards later. 
 
 (a) Place of Inductions 
 
 Very often, in the course of an argument, a speaker 
 may want to establish a general law or opinion. He 
 may, let us say, want to prove that ' ' trade unions always 
 raise the wages of labor" as a necessary step in an -argu- 
 ment to show that unions should be fostered. He might 
 reasonably be expected to establish still another 
 generalization to the effect that ''whatever raises the 
 wages of labor should be fostered." Both generalizations 
 might be accepted without further argument by the 
 
254 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 audience, but on the other hand they might require 
 demonstration. Assuming that safety calls for a careful 
 demonstration of these opinions, the speaker must 
 acquaint himself with the kinds of induction and the 
 checks Avhich are of service for each kind. 
 
 (b) Kinds of Induction 
 
 Like all propositions, the statement which expresses 
 the conclusions of an inductive inference indicates a 
 relationship) between two things. Let us illustrate first 
 one and then the other of the two possible kinds of rela- 
 tionship which may be indicated. You say, ''Trade 
 unions are the cause of high wages in America, " " Busi- 
 ness depression is of psychological origin," "A large 
 army and navy always stimulates a nation to war," or 
 ''Nations which continue to draw in foreign blood, 
 decay." In each of these statements you indicate that 
 one thing is the cause of another or the effect of another. 
 The relationship expressed is a causal relationship. It is 
 one of the two kinds of relationship which are expressed 
 often in practical, public discussions. Debaters and 
 campaign speakers often assert that certain things are 
 the causes of other things. 
 
 The second kind of relationship is one of classification. 
 Statements which indicate this relationship simply say 
 that "all A's have this or that characteristic or group of 
 characteristics." Suppose, for instance, we read, "All 
 the signers of the Constitution favored the elimination of 
 slavery in America." The asserter classifies all these 
 men as being alike in one respect — their desire to 
 eliminate slavery. The inference consists (1) of analyz- 
 ing a great many individuals or cases and (2) of making 
 a statement that will be true of all. Such a process is 
 often of service when trving to ccmvince others. In law 
 
types; of argument 255 
 
 cases we may want to prove tliat '^ihe court has alwaj^s 
 held thus and so." The following example is a typical 
 induction leading to a statement of classitication rela- 
 tionship, drawn from current, diplomatic controversy. 
 The circumstances were as follows: England declared 
 that all the ports of Germany were blockaded and that 
 any neutral vessel trying to run to or from any German 
 port, might be captured and confiscated. Certain people 
 objected to this "paper blockade," saying that no port 
 is properly under blockade unless England has a chain 
 of warships in physical command of the entire restricted 
 area. This example is an inductive argument to show 
 that ''all cases during the Civil Wry were paper block- 
 ades of the same type as that now declared by England." 
 
 When the government of the United States realized that to 
 subdue the Confederate states it must close their ports, it did 
 not hesitate to decree a blockade of 2.500 miles of coast. No 
 anchored chain of vessels would be possible on such a coast line. 
 The Supreme Court of the Ignited States looked at the purpose 
 of a blockade rather than the method of maintaining it. 
 
 The court held that a blockade was for the purpose of pre- 
 venting the ingress and egress to and from an enemy 's port. It 
 was effective if merchant vessels were . exposed to danger of 
 capture in any way. As the prime object was to cut off the 
 enemy's commerce, more attention was paid to that than to the 
 "geographical area of operations." Vessels destined for those 
 ports were supposed to contemplate running the blockade and 
 were captured without ceremony or study of ''precedents in 
 law or history.'.' 
 
 The Bermuda and the Springbok bound for Nassau in the 
 Bahama Islands, the Stephen, Hart bound for Cardenas in Cuba, 
 aiui the Pefcrhoff destined for JIatamoras, ^lexico, all British 
 ships bound for neutral ports, were captured for attempted 
 breach of blockade. The Supreme Court upheld the judgments, 
 and the British government recognized as correct the principles 
 on which the judgments were founded, and declined to protest. 
 She recognized the fact also that blockade is one of the nuisances 
 of war to which all must be subject. 
 
 We made our rules to fit the case and we can hardly deny the 
 same privilege to others. 
 
256 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (c) Clieck'mg up a Generalisation of Classificafion 
 
 AVhenever a general statement of the kind just given 
 is to be expressed and checked np, the rule to follow is 
 very simple: (1) Be sure that all the cases you have 
 observed are true cases under the general statement, 
 and (2) be sure that you have overlooked no case which 
 may exist and which may disagree with your conclusion. 
 The argument just offered as an example could be 
 refuted by revealing a single case where England did 
 protest effectively against a Civil War blockade decision. 
 It is, of course, clear that patience in research and 
 analysis is necessary to success in this form of induction. 
 While very thorough scientific method would call for a 
 most exhaustive presentation of all the available cases, 
 the practical public speaker must be guided by the temper 
 of his audience in determining the number of instances 
 he will offer. So long as those who are listening are 
 satisfied that a sufficient number of cases has been pre- 
 sented and so long as they have no suspicion that there 
 has been prejudicial selection, repression, or misrepre- 
 sentation, the speaker's induction is safe. 
 
 (d) Chcclcinfi up a Generalization of Cause and Effect 
 
 When a generalization states a causal relation, the 
 speaker faces greater difficulty. The danger here is one 
 of nnalysis. Even if the speaker embraces enough cases 
 in his observations, he may mistake one thing for the 
 cause of another merely because they have appeared 
 together in the cases he observed. Whatever precedes 
 another thing is not necessarily its cause. We shall give 
 ;i few examples of the kinds of danger incident to causal 
 inductions. Suppose a s])eaker observes that thnes of 
 prosperity in the United States have been times of high 
 tariff. He carefullv studies the returns for all the years 
 
TYPES OF AKGUI\IENT 257 
 
 of tlio nation's life and then makes the general statement 
 that since times of prosperity have been times of high 
 tariff and times of depression have been times of low 
 tariff, the tariff is the cause of prosperity. Where is the 
 danger? Simply in the fact that there may possibly have 
 been a hidden cause of prosperity snch as a bumper crop 
 or large gold supply, and the tariff may have been an 
 innocent coincidence all the while. Now, I do not know 
 about the merits of this particular question but merely 
 cite it to show that what appears to be a cause may not 
 be a cause at all. 
 
 Furthermore, the tariff might have been the true cause 
 at one period, a bumper crop at another, the gold supply 
 at a third, and general business confidence at a fourth. 
 Here we see the possibility of a plurality of causes. 
 
 Notice the following extract from a speech delivered 
 by Mr. George W. Perkins before the Economic Club 
 of New York, February 10, 1915.1 Observe that he 
 contends that it is not the taritT which has caused the 
 trusts but rather the various means of intercommunica- 
 tion. As you read, make up your mind whether or not 
 he supports his contention. 
 
 Did any man in this room ever hear of a political leader or 
 so-called statesman delivering- a speech in a State legislature 
 or the National Congress, calling the attention of the people to 
 the mighty changes that have taken place in the methods of 
 intercommunication during the last twenty years and pointing 
 out that, as intercommunication is the first requisite for doing 
 business, these mighty changes are entirely responsible for the 
 centralization of business? 
 
 On the contrary, speech after speech has been made, ha- 
 rangning our people with the grossly misleading statement that 
 the trusts exist becaure of the tariff and the greed and avarice 
 of a small group of men. A more pernicious and misleading 
 statement has never been thrust on the attention of oui' pf^ople. 
 No one would dare make it, if oui- political leaders had their 
 
 Copied ffom reprint put out by Tlie Market Woyld and Chronicle. 
 
258 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 minds on the real prol)lem, rather than on vote-getting ; if they 
 really studied big industrial questions from the viewpoint of 
 the public good, rather than their own good ; if they had the 
 courage and honesty to stand up for what is right and sound in 
 law and business, rather than for what is for the moment 
 popular. The tariff never made a trust and free trade never 
 will destroy one. It requires only a very little serious, intelli- 
 gent thought to reach the inevitable conclusion that, if we were 
 given free trade in this country tomorrow, not a single so- 
 called trust would dissolve ; on the other hand, even though 
 our tariff were put as high as the mountains, if that strange 
 force which we call electricity were suddenly withdrawn from 
 our use, and the telephone and telegraph went out of ex- 
 istence, not a single so-called trust would continue for twenty- 
 four hours. 
 
 If Mr. Perkins had given conclusive proof tlirougli an 
 adequate number of cases that all trusts were caused l)y 
 and are maintained by tlie agency of intercommunication, 
 he would have made a perfect argument to the effect 
 that trusts are not caused by the tariff. One of the ways 
 to refute an induction of cause is to prove a rival or 
 hidden cause. One of the precautions in establishing a 
 cause is to dispose of all other rival causes. 
 
 Just as there are hidden causes, sometimes there are 
 hidden obstacles to the operation of a cause. Let us 
 give an example of the interference of the full operation 
 of a cause to produce its usual effect. 
 
 Dr. Harvey W. Wiley, in the September (1914) number 
 of Good Housekeeping, discusses the inference drawn, 
 concerning the effect of aluminum compounds on the 
 human system, by the Referee Board of Scientific 
 Experts which is consulted in matters aft'ected by the 
 Pure Pood Law. He said: 
 
 Three membei-s of llie Keferoc Board proceeded to condiicl 
 experiments to det<M'iiiiiie this point (1h<> harmful possibilities 
 of aluminum compounds w hen used in food). These men w(>i"e 
 Professor Russrll ]|. ( 'liillendcn, of Yale University; Di'. 
 Alonzo Yj. Taylor, of tlic Uni\-.Tsi1y of Pennsyh^ania ; and \)v. 
 
TYPES OF ARGUMENT 259 
 
 John H. Long, of NorthAvostern University. Dr. Chittenden 
 experimented upon a squad of twelve men for 130 days ; Dr. 
 Taylor used eight men; and Dr. Long conducted his experi- 
 ments with six. Dr. Chittenden used bread raised with alum 
 baking-powder made in the laboratory ; Dr. Long used a mix- 
 ture of the composition that is left in bread after alum baking- 
 powder has been used to raise it ; and Dr. Taylor used an alum 
 baking-powder administered in wafers or dissolved in water. 
 
 As a result of their Avork, Dr. Chittenden concludes that 
 small quantities of aluminum compounds, and even compara- 
 tively large quantities taken daily with food, have no effect 
 upon the general health and nutrition of the body ; Dr. Long- 
 reaches substantially the same conclusion ; and Dr. Taylor is 
 of the opinion that little danger exists from the use of alum 
 baking-powder that is not also attendant upon the use of any 
 other kind. * * * The report shows that in experiments 
 where the aluminum was given in capsules these contained 
 also the specific anticlofe for the poison in the form of bicar- 
 bonate of soda. All baking-powders contain bicarbonate of 
 soda in varying quantities, of course ; but it is a fact that 
 where too much is used this causes yellow splotches in the 
 bread, and to avoid this there must be more acid, in this case 
 alum. Baking-powder manufacturers state that a chemical 
 reaction takes place in baking which transforms the alum into 
 aluminum hydroxide, insoluble in water and therefore harm- 
 less in the digestive tract ; but this is true only when there is 
 enough bicarbonate to neutralize the alum, which is not always 
 the case. 
 
 The Referee Board had been studiously careful to dodge the 
 issue contained in the use of alum for the hardening of pickles 
 foi' the purpose of concealing their inferiority. It is true that 
 Dr. Long has drawn attention to the general use of alum in 
 pickles, but he coincidentally concludes that the quantity of 
 aluminum that might be consumed in either pickles or fruits 
 is so small compared with the quantities actually consumed in 
 baking-powders, that the study of the baking-powders may be 
 taken to cover the entire field. He has, it would seem, gone 
 far out of his Avay to imply that the alum found in pickles and 
 other food products is the same l-incl of aJuni to be found in 
 and produced by the chemical reactions of the baking-powders, 
 and there is not the slightest evidence to indicate that this 
 assumption is true. As pointed out, the baking-poAvders con- 
 tain, in the form of bicarbonate of soda, some of their own 
 antidoie for the alum, Avhile the pickles and the fruits, as Avell 
 as other foods, contain none of this antidote. This leaA^es Avhat 
 
260 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 I insist is deleterious to be taken into the human system, and 
 thus permits a wide gap to be torn in the Pure Food Law. 
 
 We cannot take space to point out all the errors pos- 
 sible in a causal induction, nor to explain all the 
 precautions devised by logicians to insure correct 
 generalizations, but the illustrations given will indicate 
 the general danger and the following checks will serve 
 most of the purposes of the practical speaker. 
 
 1. Apply the two checks already given for generaliza- 
 tions of classification. 
 
 2. If you conclude that one thing is invariably the 
 cause of another, see if you can find anything else which 
 can also be its cause. 
 
 3. Analyze to discover in existing circumstances any- 
 thing which might nullify the action of a cause which 
 you believe would produce a certain effect if left to act 
 freely. 
 
 4. On the other hand, analyze to see if your cause of 
 an observed effect really produced that effect by itself 
 or if it was merely a part of a combination which was 
 necessary to bring about the result. 
 
 Of course, it is obvious that to apply these checks you 
 must have many facts as ^vell as circumstances which 
 make correct analysis possible. 
 
 Deductiox 
 
 We have just explained that induction is the process 
 by which we infer a general law from a limited number 
 of observed facts; deduction is the process by which, 
 after accepting a general law, we infer other information 
 which reasonably follows from it. For example, we have 
 the general statement, "All United States senators must 
 be thirty years old or over." From this we infer that 
 Senator A or Senator B must be at least thirty years 
 old. 
 
TYPES OF ARGUMENT 2G1 
 
 The simplest form of deductive reasoning to explain, 
 is called a syllogism of the first form. All syllogisms 
 consist of two statements known as premises from which 
 one reasonably infers a third statement or conclusion. 
 The argument just given can be expressed in this 
 syllogistic form as follows : 
 
 All United States Senators must be thirty years old 
 or older. 
 
 Mr. A. is a United States Senator. 
 
 Therefore, Mr. A. must be thirty years old or older. 
 
 Note the following things about the syllogism. The 
 first statement or major premise is a generalization 
 which is the result of a previous induction. If you 
 accept it, very well; but if you question it, an enumera- 
 tion of cases to establish it (like any other induction) is. 
 necessary. Second, the minor premise states a fact about 
 a particular man. Its acceptability is determined in the 
 same manner as any other question of fact. (See last 
 lesson.) Granted these two premises, the conclusion 
 follows as a natural deduction. 
 
 In most speeches, deductive argimients are not pre- 
 sented in the naked syllogistic form, nor are all the parts 
 always given. Yet the syllogism is in the mind of the 
 speaker. A concrete example of the style used in actual 
 presentation is to be found in the following extract from 
 the speech by Joseph Warren on the Boston Massacre, 
 delivered March 6, 1775. 
 
 That personal freedom is the natural right of every man, and 
 that property, or an exehisive right to dispose of whatever he 
 has honestly acquired by his own labor, necessarily arises 
 therefrom, are truths which common sense has i)laced beyond 
 the reach of contradiction. And no man or body of men can, 
 without l)eing guilty of flagrant injustice, claim the right to 
 dispose of the persons or acquisitions of any other man, or 
 body of men, unless it can be proved that such a right has 
 arisen from some compact between the parties, in which it 
 has been explicitly and freely granted. 
 
262 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 If I may be indulged in taking a retrospective vieAv of the 
 first settlement of our country, it will be easy to determine 
 with what degree of justice the late Parliament of Great 
 Britain have assumed the power of giving away that property 
 which the Americans have earned by their labor. 
 
 Our fathers, having nobly resolved never to wear the yoke 
 of despotism, and seeing the European world, at that time, 
 through indolence and cowardice, falling a prey to tyranny, 
 bravely threw themselves upon the bosom of the ocear>, de- 
 termined to find a place in which they might enjoy their 
 freedom, or perish in the glorious attempt. Approving heaven 
 beheld the favorite bark dancing upon the waves, and gra- 
 ciouslj^ preserved it until the chosen families were safely 
 brought to these western regions. They found the land swarm- 
 ing with savages, who threatened death with every kind of 
 torture. But savages and death wdth torture, were far less 
 terrible than slavery. * * * 
 
 From these savages, our ancestors acquired title to the soil, 
 and the business was transacted by the parties in the same 
 independent manner that it would have been had neither of 
 them ever known or heard of the island of Great Britain. 
 
 Having -become the honest proprietors of the soil, they im- 
 mediately applied themselves to the cultivation of it ; and they 
 soon beheld the virgin earth teeming with richest fruits, a 
 grateful recompense for their unwearied toil. The fields began 
 to wave with ripening harvests, and the late barren wilder- 
 ness was seen to blossom like a rose. * * * 
 
 When, at an infinite expense of toil and blood, this widely 
 extended continent had been cultivated and defended . * * * 
 this country was thought worthy of the attention of the 
 British ministry ; and the only successful means of rendering 
 the colonies serviceable to Britain, was adopted. By an inter- 
 course of friendly offices, the two countries became so united 
 in affection that they thought not of any distinct or separate 
 interests, and both countri(>s were flourishing and happy. 
 # * « 
 
 This pleasing connection might have continued, but un- 
 happily for us and unliappily for Britain, the madness of an 
 avaricious minister has brought upon the stage, discord, envy, 
 hate, and revenge, Avith civil war close in their rear. Sonic 
 demon, in an evil hour, suggested to a short-sighted financier 
 the hateful project of transferring the whole property of the 
 king's subjects in America to his subjects in Britain. The 
 claim of the Bi'itisli pnrliament to tax the colonies can never 
 
TYPES OF ARGUMENT 263 
 
 (k- supported but by such a transfer ; for the rijrht of the 
 House of Commons of Great Britain to originate any tax or 
 grant of money, is altogether derived from their being elected 
 by the people of Great Britain to act for them; and the people 
 of Great Britain cannot confer upon their representatives a 
 right to give or grant anything which they themselves have 
 not a right to give or grant personally. 
 
 Therefore, it folloAvs that if the members chosen by the peo- 
 ple of Great Britain, to represent them in parliament, have, by 
 virtue of their being so chosen, any right to give or grant 
 American property, or to lay any tax upon the lands or per- 
 sons of the colonists, it is because the lands and people in the 
 colonies are. hoiia fide, owned by, and justly belonging to the 
 people of Great Britain. But (as has been before observed) 
 every man has a right to personal freedom ; consequently a 
 right to enjoy what is acquired by his own labor. And it is 
 evident that the property in this country has been acquired 
 by our own labor ; it is the duty of the people of Great Britain 
 to produce some compact in which Ave have explicitly given 
 up to them a right to dispose of our persons or property. 
 Until this is done, every attempt of theirs, or those they have 
 deputed to act for them, to give or grant any part of our 
 property, is directly repugnant to every principle of reason 
 and natural justice. And I maj' boldly say that no such 
 compact exists. 
 
 The syllogisms in the preceding extract might be 
 formulated as follows : 
 I. (a) Personal freedom is the natural right of every 
 man. 
 (b) Free persons have property rights in the fruits 
 
 of their own toil. 
 Consequently, every man has property rights in the 
 fruits of his own toil. 
 II. (a) Every man has property rights in what he 
 earns by toil, 
 (b) Americans earned America through their own 
 
 toil. 
 Consequently, Americans hold America as their own 
 property. 
 
264 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 III. (a) The British parliament can tax or dispose of 
 
 the property of British subjects only, 
 (b) American subjects are not British subjects. 
 Consequently, the British parliament cannot tax or 
 dispose of the property of American subjects. 
 
 IV. (a) The British parliament can dispose of or tax 
 
 only such American property as was granted 
 to British subjects by compact. 
 
 (b) No American property was granted by compact 
 to British subjects. 
 
 Consequently, the British parliament can. dispose of 
 or tax no American property. 
 
 We may draw a few conclusions concerning deductive 
 reasoning from the example just given. 
 
 1. In actual delivery a person sometimes omits one 
 or more parts of the syllogism. Thus, in the first 
 syllogism above, we inserted the necessary" minor premise 
 which was omitted by Warren though he must have had 
 it in mind. In the following argument, the major 
 premise is left out. '*We must fight for America in this 
 issue (conclusion) because such conduct is patriotic" 
 (minor premise). The omitted major would be, ''We 
 must do whatever is patriotic." If we wished, we could 
 state the major and minor premises and omit the con- 
 clusion without weakening the effect. Indeed, we might 
 even express only the minor premise and still convey 
 our meaning and its reasons. Tims all would under- 
 stand the statement, "To fight for America in this issue 
 is an act of patriotism." 
 
 Of course, a speaker should have the whole fabric of 
 argument in mind even though he may choose to omit 
 parts in delivery. The strength of the argument depends 
 upon the parts which must be supplied as well as upon 
 those expressed. 
 
TYPES OF ARGr:\IEXT 265 
 
 2. Notice tliat tlio conclusion of sylloiiisin I l)oconies 
 tlic major premise ot* syHoi>ism II. Tliis is often tlie 
 case and sucli a chain of reasoning does not necessitate 
 a re])etition of the statement which constitutes the link. 
 
 '.]. Sjilogistic and all other deductive reasoning rests 
 on a few principh^s inherent in classification. For 
 instance, in syllogisms I and II the principle is : What- 
 ever is true of a whole class of things is true of each 
 member of the class. In syllogisms III and IV the 
 principle is: That which is outside of a class (British 
 property in this case) does not participate in the char- 
 acteristics of the class (Parliamentary control). These 
 and numerous other principles follow from the mere 
 classifying of all the things of the universe according to 
 various characteristics and relationships. We shall 
 give one more illustration. 
 
 All desirable citizens are literate. 
 
 Some Poles are desirable citizens. 
 
 Consequently: Some Poles (not all) are literate. 
 
 The principle here is that if a part of a group is 
 included in another group, then only the included portion 
 participates in the characteristic of the other group. 
 
 From these examples and principles, as well as others 
 which could be brought forth, we get a notion of the 
 nature of deduction. The following three checks will 
 insure correct deductions : 
 
 1. The exact meaning of each expression used in the 
 reasoning — both as to the extent of its application and 
 the characteristics it denotes — must be kept clearly in 
 mind. 
 
 2. Each expression must be used in one sense and one 
 sense only. 
 
 3. A clear mental picture of the class relationships 
 must be kept in mind. 
 
266 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Let us apply these checks to a few typical cases. 
 
 (a) All members of labor uiiioiis are efficient workmen. 
 The three carpenters working on the X house are 
 
 not union men. 
 Consequently, the three X carpenters are not 
 efficient workmen. 
 Wrong conclusion, because the picture of a wide group 
 of efficient workmen including union men and possibly 
 more besides, was not kept clearly in mind. If it had 
 been, the three X carpenters might have been included 
 in the efficient group as well as union men. (Involves 
 checks 1 and 3, page 265.) 
 
 (b) American citizens should always support that 
 
 which is democratic. 
 Woodrow Wilson is the Democratic candidate. 
 Consequently, all Americans should support 
 Woodrow Wilson. 
 Wrong conclusion, because the word democratic is 
 used in two different senses. (Involves check 2.) 
 
 (c) All German territory is civilized. 
 
 No Russian province is German territory. 
 Consequently, no Russian province is civilized. 
 Wrong conclusion. (See checks 1 and 3.) 
 
 Analogy 
 
 We often find in works of logic, argumentation, and 
 public speaking a third form of argument in addition to 
 induction and deduction, the analogy. But to us this 
 does not seem to constitute a third and different kind of 
 reasoning. The essence of the analogy is to argue that 
 since two things are alike in many respects they should 
 also be alike in other respects. Once Abraham Lincoln 
 was asked why he did not change generals, since the 
 campaign seemed to be going against the man in com- 
 
TYPKS OF AErTT':\rEXT 267 
 
 maiul. IIo replied, '^I do not tliiiik it is a ,i;ood plan to 
 cliaiiiic horses while crossiiiii- a stream." This was 
 reasoning from analogy. 
 
 , To us it seems that analogy is rather the means of 
 making a thing clear by more familiar example than 
 reasoning in the true sense of the word. Or where the 
 one M'ho advances the analogy is reasoning rather than 
 illustrating, the process is in reality deductive. For 
 instance, the major premise in the Lincoln argument is 
 "I never change agents in the midst of a risky enter- 
 prise." The minor premise is, ''To change generals in 
 the midst of tliis campaign is to change agents in the 
 midst of a risky enterprise" and consequently, "I will 
 not change generals." But instead of saying the major 
 premise to his hearer, in general or abstract language, 
 he represents the same idea by saying, "I never change 
 l.orses while crossing a stream." In other w^ords, this 
 i^ a deductive argument with a particular and concrete 
 case used to represent, in a familiar and forceful manner, 
 the general and abstract major premise. 
 
 Other Deductive Forms 
 
 There are other more elaborate forms of deductive 
 reasoning, some of which we shall mention briefly. 
 Observe that the checks already given for deductive 
 reasoning may be applied to these forms as well as to 
 the simpler syllogisms, 
 (a) Disjunctive reasoning. 
 
 Major : He is either a fool or a knave. 
 
 1. Minor: He is a fool and (conclusion) not a knave. 
 
 2. Minor: He is a knave and (conclusion) not a fool. 
 
 3. Minor: He is not a fool and (conclusion) is a 
 knave. 
 
 4. ]\rinor: He is not a knave and (conclusion) is a 
 fool. 
 
268 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (b) Hyi^otbetical reasoning 
 
 ]\[ajor : If this is gold, it will stand the acid test. 
 
 1. Minor: It is gold; therefore (conclusion) it will 
 stand the acid test. 
 
 2. Minor: It is not gold; (conclusion) it will not 
 stand the acid test. 
 
 3. Minor: It will stand the acid test; (conclusion) 
 it may be gold. 
 
 4. Minor: It will not stand the acid test; (conclu- 
 sion) it is not gold. 
 
 (c) Dilemma 
 
 Major : If he is guilty, he must apologize or resign. 
 
 Minor: He is gTiilty. Or, He is not guilty. 
 
 Conclusion : He must apologize, etc. Or, He must not 
 apologize, etc. 
 
 Besides this, there are still other forms of dilemma. 
 Furthermore, there are so many forms of syllogistic and 
 extra-syllogistic reasoning, that if we offered twice as 
 many examples more, the whole list would not be 
 exhausted. But the checks given will insure safe naviga- 
 tion on the whole sea of deduction, no matter how various 
 and high the waves may be. 
 
 A speaker must determine whether an argument is 
 deductive or inductive and then apply the checks which 
 the form requires. It is well to remember that reasoning 
 is always inductive when the conclusion is general and 
 depends for its nature upon manj^ observed facts, each 
 one of which contributes to determine the nature of the 
 conclusion. Eeasoning is deductive when the conclusion 
 depends explicitly or implicitly upon truth found in 
 premises which wore previouslj^ accepted as true. 
 
 AVith this general summary, we shall close the lesson 
 on formal reasoning. The next lesson will l)e given over 
 to directions for the drawing up of a brief for an argu- 
 ment and some practical instructions concerning the 
 
TYPES OF ARGU.AIENT 269 
 
 treatment of a ])ai'ticiilar audience and a particular 
 opponent in an argumentative contest. As a good 
 theoretical preparation for that lesson, we urge that the 
 student be sure of his mastery of this lesson and the one 
 which preceded it. 
 
 ASSIGNMENT OF WORK. 
 
 Tlic written excrcisc-s in this entire lesson should be 
 earcfiilly worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 ,.;^->^ in your notebook. 
 
 eis( 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson at least three times and then in 
 two columns eompare and contrast the characteristics of 
 inductive and deductive reasoning. Thus : 
 
 Inductive , Deductive 
 
 1. I 1. 
 
 Second Day. — Prove in a well written out, inductive argument 
 one of the following generalizations : 
 
 1. All wars have been caused by selfishness. 
 
 2. Mechanical inventions have promoted the happiness 
 of mankind. 
 
 3. The genius has always been the man with an enor- 
 mous capacity for work. 
 
 4. The commission form of government has been suc- 
 cessful in the United States. 
 
 5. The unionizing of labor has promoted true social 
 progress. 
 
 (Take either affirmative or negative and if these generali- 
 zations do not appeal to you, formulate one of your o^^^l, 
 the fact-support of which is accessible to you.) 
 
 Third Day. — List the special cases used in the argument written 
 out on the second day. With these single words in a list 
 as the outline, orally deliver the argument. Do not try to 
 rememl)er words you wrote ; simply develop your ideas 
 extemporaneously, using the list of single instances as your 
 only guide. 
 
 Fourih Day. — Read some modern arguments on current topics 
 — in such magazines as The Survey, The New Bepuhlic, 
 
270 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 North America)! Review, The Ouflool\ and the editorial 
 pages of good newspapers. Select some of the arguments 
 and analyze them. Attach the clippings to your analyses. 
 The analyses should show the forms of reasoning, listing 
 the conclusions and the cases to support inductions as well 
 as premises to support deductions. The suppressed parts 
 must also be indicated. Add your criticism, pointing out 
 weaknesses or elements of strength. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Beginning with one of the following as a major 
 premise, write out a deductive argument in favor of some 
 particular reform. 
 
 1. Every child should be allowed full time for physical 
 and mental development. 
 
 2. The penalties of war should be visited only upon the 
 armed forces of the nations engaged in war. 
 
 3. Every man has an equal right to the free gifts of 
 nature. 
 
 4. The safeguarding of property rights is the foundation 
 of a sound, modern state. 
 
 5. No civilized government should act upon motives of 
 retaliation or revenge. 
 
 (Take either the affirmative or negative of these or add a 
 general principle of your own, which you believe is funda 
 mentally true.) 
 
 Write out your argument in full and accompany it with 
 a syllogistic analysis similar to the one on page 263 of this 
 lesson. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in tliis lesson. Tli(>y 
 are suggestire merely, dealing largtdy with tlie practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. Which has greater weight iu an argument, knowledge of 
 facts or skill in the forms of reasoning? If an opponent deliv- 
 ered a very masterful argument of convincing form, but you 
 knew one fact that did not agree with his conclusion, how would 
 you refute him? 
 
 2. What is a perfect induction? 
 
 8. What is an imperfect induction? Are most inductions 
 perfect or imperfect? 
 
 4. What is meant by a hasty generalization ? 
 
 5. Why must we check up generalizations and especially 
 those which are obtained through imperfect inductions? 
 
 6. What are the checks for a generalization of a classifica- 
 tion relationship? 
 
 7. Why must additional checks be applied to a generaliza- 
 tion of causal relationship? What are the additional checks? 
 
 8. How do you like the style of j\Ir. Perkins' argument? 
 Does it seem too full of feeling? Does he use too many adjectives 
 which show that he is prejudiced? Is his style almost as l)ad 
 as that of certain "wild-eyed radicals?" 
 
 9. W^iat do you think of Dr. Wiley's style? What are 
 its good points? What are its bad points? 
 
 10. What is a syllogism? What is a premise? What is a 
 conclusion ? 
 
 11. What do you think of Warren's style? Is it too 
 pompous for a modern audience? Do j^ou like such expressions 
 
 271 
 
272 EFFECTIVE ri'BLlC SPEAKING 
 
 as "bravely threw themselves upon the breast of the ocean" and 
 "barren wilderness was seen to blossom like a rose?" 
 
 12. Is it necessary, in actual delivery, to give all the parts 
 of a syllogism ? 
 
 13. AVhat are the three checks to insure correct deductive 
 reasoning ? 
 
 14. What is the value of analogy? Is it chiefly argu- 
 mentative or literary? 
 
 15. How is the dilemma related to the disjunctive and tlie 
 liypothetical syllogism? 
 
LESSON 15 
 
 ARGUMENTATION 
 
 1. Briefing 
 
 The importance of organization and tlie value of a 
 definitely drawn up plan for any kind of speech has 
 already been brought to the attention of the student. In 
 Lesson 1, the use of a simple yet logical outline as the 
 groundwork of speech delivery was explained. Such out- 
 lines, with a small number of divisions and subdivisions, 
 have been referred to again and again during the course 
 and especially in the first six lessons. Now, while we are 
 concentrating upon argumentation, we must go more 
 minutely into the details of the technical brief. In 
 common with the outlines mentioned, such a brief is 
 drawn up only after ample material has been gathered 
 and digested. In our discussion of the form of the brief, 
 therefore, we shall assume that reading and note-taking, 
 or some other means of acquiring information, has gone 
 before. 
 
 Tlie simple outlines were merely guides for the 
 speaker to follow during his delivery. The rigorous, 
 argumentative briefs are useful not only in this way, to a 
 certain extent, but they also serve far wider purposes. 
 Such a brief is a storehouse of all the available material 
 of value to establish a certain proposition. Like all good 
 storehouses or filing systems, it must be designed to hold 
 its contents in classified groups. Furthermore, all the 
 opinions to be maintained and to be related in a running 
 273 
 
274 effp:ctive public speaking 
 
 argTiment, must be recorded in such a manner that (1) 
 the particular strength or weakness of each assertion will 
 be revealed, (2) the existence or non-existence of fact- 
 supports will be evident, and (3) the nature and trust- 
 worthiness of the sources may be manifest. Consequently, 
 after all his careful research, a speaker, in drawing up 
 his brief, arranges his arg-umentative material in a 
 manner which will not only store it systematically for 
 reference, but which will also expose and give warning of 
 any weakness which may exist. 
 
 But what are the parts of a brief? They are similar 
 in many respects to the parts of the outline of any speech ; 
 but those portions which involve care in statement and 
 logical form will be worked out with more than ordinary 
 patience. Obviously, the body of the brief is the main 
 line of argument ; but just as the body of any other speech 
 requires a preparatory portion, so also an introduction is 
 necessary here. Besides this, and a conclusion, we shall 
 enumerate the parts of a typical brief. 
 
 (a ) Tlw Proposition 
 
 The proposition is a statement of the opinion which the 
 speaker is about to demonstrate. It should be clearly 
 formulated at the head of the brief and have the follow- 
 ing characteristics : 
 
 1. It must express a logically real proposition. We 
 mean that it must be capable of proof or disproof if an 
 honest effort to demonstrate it is made. If the proposi- 
 tion, however, be unreal, it is, on its face, not susceptible 
 of demonstration, pro or con. For instance, one who says, 
 "The government ought not to undertake activities out- 
 side its proper field of action", is offering an unreal 
 proposition — one which on its face cannot be proved. He 
 practically says, "The government ought not to do what 
 it ought not to do." Tliere is nothing here to argue 
 
ARGUMENTATION 275 
 
 about. There is a tautologous or identical, empty sliell 
 of assertion. No issue is' raised; there is nothing to 
 prove; in one sense, the thing is self-evident. Now if 
 the proposition were, ''To conduct the telegraph and 
 telephone business of the country, is a proper govern- 
 mental activity," we would have a real proposition 
 worthy of investigation, to be settled affirmatively or 
 negatively. A speaker could expound his concept of 
 "proper governmental activity" and then demonstrate 
 that the conducting of the telegraph and telephone busi- 
 ness of the country comes within the field. Here a rela- 
 tionship capable of proof or disproof is stated and the 
 proposition is real. Since we sometimes say things which 
 are incapable of demonstration, it is well for one about 
 to argue an opinion to formulate it carefully in a proposi- 
 tion and then to examine that proposition to see if it is 
 real and worthy of argument. 
 
 2. The proposition should be clear and unmistakable 
 in meaning. 
 
 3. It should not be complicated with numerous issues 
 and modifications. If, on first writing, it seems too 
 intricate, try to make a broad but simple statement which 
 will include all you have in mind. 
 
 (h) The Introduction 
 
 Like all speeches, the argument usually requires an 
 introduction. For the general purposes of an introduc- 
 tion, see Lessons 3 and 4. It will be noticed that a part 
 to put the audience in a favorable emotional state is 
 important. But in the brief this part is not written down. 
 The speaker adjusts himself to the prevailing atmos- 
 phere, extemporaneously; the brief contains only matter 
 related to the intellectual grasp of ideas and their logical 
 relationship. Therefore the legitimate introduction to 
 an arg-ument is designed to educate the hearers so that 
 
276 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 they can follow tlie reasoning processes wliicli logically 
 lead to an acceptance of the main proposition. The most 
 desirable arrangement of this material is as follows : 
 
 (a) General survey of the situatio'n or problem. — Here 
 the speaker gives a general idea of the occasion for hold- 
 ing an opinion and trying to demonstrate it to others. It 
 is a sort of comprehensive ontline to enable the hearer 
 to get his bearing. 
 
 (b) Detailed facts of informational value. — Here is 
 presented knowledge necessary to an understanding of 
 the arguments which are to follow. More facts are usu- 
 ally recorded than will be expressed in actual delivery of 
 the introduction. They are all recorded in this place for 
 convenience and are drawn forth or left alone according 
 to the exigencies of the occasion. Before some audiences, 
 the initial, educational matter may be reduced very much, 
 while other audiences will need not only all that is avail- 
 able, but will need all of it repeated in various terms. 
 Sometimes it is wise not to mention some of the facts 
 here recorded, early in the argument, but to reserve them 
 to be interwoven in the argimient proper. 
 
 (c) Waived and granted matter is next indicated so as 
 to narrow the field of discussion. By tvaived matter, we 
 mean matter which is indeed related to the general subject 
 but which we wish to set aside (without influencing any 
 opinion about it one way or the other) in order to limit 
 ourselves to a selected field. For instance, if we were 
 arguing that ^' Women ought to be allowed to vote for 
 federal officers," we might well waive or set aside con- 
 siderations of constitutionality. To be sure the women 
 could not be granted such suffrage unless all differences 
 under these considerations were settled, but we wish to 
 reserve that phase of possible disagreement and confine 
 our attention to the practical effects of granting the 
 suft'rage whether it is constitutional or not. AVaiv('(l 
 matter lias no influence upon the discussion as limited. 
 
ARGUMENTATION 277 
 
 Granted matter, on tlip other hand, is something 
 accepted as true and of full weight in the argument. It is 
 not demonstrated, because it is accepted as true. It must 
 be reckoned with and given its proper place in the forma- 
 tion of final opinions. 
 
 (d) Definition of terms. — When necessary, terms are 
 defined so that when they are used there will arise in the 
 minds of the hearers exactly the same notions as exist 
 in the mind of the speaker. For technique of definition, 
 see Lesson 12, p. 222. 
 
 (e) The main issues are next enumerated. They are 
 subordinate propositions which, if accepted, together 
 give complete logical support to the principal proposi- 
 tion. Just as that proposition sums up the final opinion 
 on the whole field of discussion, so these issues sum up the 
 opinions which arise from a consideration of logical 
 subdivisions into which the wiiole field naturally falls. 
 It is obvious that these subdivisions must not overlap 
 and they must, taken together, cover the whole ground, 
 omitting nothing. 
 
 The arrangement of these issues in a certain order of 
 sequence is governed by the principles of organization 
 explained in Lesson 5. 
 
 (f) A restatement of the proposition is necessary at 
 this point because when first stated it was not fully 
 explained. Furthermore, it is well to restate the proposi- 
 tion just at the beginning of the details of proof which 
 make up the argument proper. 
 
 (c) The Body of the Brief 
 
 This portion must be analyzed carefully. The paper 
 should be ruled so that there are two broad columns and, 
 to the right, one narrow column. Before discussing the 
 details as arranged in these columns, it will be well to 
 read through a type brief. It is immaterial whether or 
 not we agree with the proposition. 
 
278 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 g J S ^ i C S -^ ••- ^ 2 "S •- = - a^ t< "i^ 
 
 lliil^ o:^^ l^lllllllif 
 
 ci E i -=r. 
 
 fc C C " E 
 
 iC. 
 
 C3 ^ jc ^ w t^ C/ -i^ ^ a; S H- ^ 
 . g |.2C fl S -^ -^J ^ 5^ o ~ 4: . -^J 
 
 
 
 '+i -^ "S ci o ;^ -/i ^ ,> dJ « O ?n .5 > ^"5 ^ 
 
 
 c £-g £ c 
 
 o -^ .ii ,^ ^ S 
 
 , ^ 5' S -^'S i ^ >. S ^ cc ^ I £ 5 
 
 
 o, - s.^- -^ -^ - s s g o :^ i o ^ ^ -^ »^ S -E i ^ 2 S g >4 ^ ^ ■= 
 
 ^ = ^-=i-3 0-.= i 'S g - J i ^-5 i a^.S 5-"" J5-<1^ 
 
 "5 ^ J 'S- •£ 'i ':5 o . 
 

 
 ARGUMENTATION 279 
 
 
 M 
 
 
 ;c E .. 2 C 5 5 &H .3 .S 03 ' 
 
 
 
 COS 
 
 11^ r^ 1 S'l 
 
 
 S o .2 -2 .2 
 
 >• M ^ -i I -2 1 ^' 111 ? ^ 5 5 ^ == I ^ '^ r 
 
 i- ^ r. i- ;;: :^ 5 ? .. .1 , S ^ £ S- i"g ° S -H ^ = -1 £ a; 
 
 
 &; £; ^ '^l-S-g-S'S I K g 
 
 
 Ci 
 
 pq r ^ 
 
280 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 S . ^ p^ c . 
 
 S CO g . g 
 
 
 
 O 2 X J 
 
 5 - c: c 
 
 
 ^ = iL§ 
 
 I =-2 i := 3 ° I'S J I i ^ ^ 1 "^ 'I I i "^ 
 
 
 0;'°^.; 
 
 =^' -f- o 
 
 a, c ■+^ 
 
 o S! CO ?; ^i: ^ c 
 
 
 
 C '5 ?^ 5 aj ■ 
 
 
 Oj ^.. 
 
 ss i«-^i-2f S gg3 &|s;g o. you 
 
 
 1i o^ See 
 
 i 2 . . . . Jl . 
 
ARGUMENTATION 
 
 281 
 
 S-5 
 
 <, Q U'S 
 
 
 i O -^ x 
 
 I 5 
 
 r' z, ■A 
 
 ""-= r. "" c - 
 
 t £ = ^ 1^ '-^ 
 
 ^ K -2 ^ -r 
 
 -4= — > '-t 
 
 "^ ~ fe ■£ * ■- = 6 5J 
 
 C P4 
 
 ? 
 
 
 
 
 o '^ ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 i° 
 
 
 
 5 S 
 
 
 s 
 
 8^- 
 
 
 T 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 §^-^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 "v S 
 
 
 «8 
 
 
 -73 
 
 
 r J 
 
 
 "5 - "^ 
 
 o 
 
 
 "5^ 
 
 
 
 2ta 
 
 
 2 Oh 
 
 
 c 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 41 
 111 
 
 
 
 S "cS 
 
 
 
 c ^ 
 
 _ ? 
 
 
 O "S 
 
 
 
 
 O eS 
 
 
 >? 
 
 "^ 
 
 
 H C- 
 
 
 
 
 
 S <i> 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 3 
 
 S 
 
 S 
 
 ce-5:^ 
 
 o 
 
 
 S9 
 
 
 
 -^1 
 
 
 •r -^ 
 
 >. 
 
 
 
 
 
 »:•;:« 
 
 S 
 
 
 ^ w 
 
 c 
 
 
 
 
 o o 
 
 "o^ 
 
 5; c 
 
 "? 
 
 
 ]5 
 
 =* r c 
 
 X 
 
 <2 
 
 2 
 
 O Bj C 
 
 o 
 
 H 
 
 
 1 
 
 ^ o 
 
 1 
 
 3 
 
 3 
 
 "3 S" 
 
 ^ 
 
 Is 3' 
 
 
 cli 
 
 H 
 
 1 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 p 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ph 
 
 
 d 
 
 a 
 
 z<i 
 
 
 
 
 •<* 
 
 LO 
 
 
 
 
 > 
 
 
 K- 
 
 
 5 
 
282 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (i( 
 
 %'^ 
 
 =: . &c •-' 2 ;'. — -r 
 
 30 _-+J -C -I ^-^ i -j: -i 
 
 il^l-sl ^1 i| "^^ 
 
 CC •-- a; 
 
 o 
 
 
 5: 
 
 &2 ? 
 
 O OS 
 
 a-v) 
 
 W — -^ .S hc-i rt a.— . - o r^ a, a; 
 
 
 a I — 
 
 9 2-1i-t = 2 S--J 
 
 25 ° c >.S-5 o " S '" " '"' ~ 
 
 ^o o § 
 
 
 S 0) „.-; 
 
 a,a3+i>-»'/! .«j:~o S^.2,^ ,0!e5 '^_C^ 
 
 Ji:|5g.|5j^^£ .a^£| ^=^i^ 2:1 
 
 l^.2=-nS- Sg^l 
 
 :3 =te.£ 
 
 o y 
 
 
 o 2 O '-M .S 
 
 di.^-^ L^si^ iJifi 
 
 p:|:^H:ia^^:^.s ^^.^ ^6:-^ M$i^ 
 .••o^e<iS'p.^|-=| K.-ri i.--^'2 ^^^^ 
 
 
 4 !-< O i>» 
 
 * 2 -2 ~ 
 
ARGUMENTATION 283 
 
 ConcerniiHj the tliree columns. — The backbone of tlie 
 inference column is made up of the issues. Each one of 
 them is an inference and all of the subordinate state- 
 ments which are offered as supports are also inferences. 
 These issues should be examined systematically. In the 
 first place, they are propositions just as the main resolu- 
 tion is a proposition, and consequently should be tested 
 as to reality, clearness, and simplicity. (See remarks 
 under the heading, ''The Proposition.") After being 
 satisfied as to the form of each of your issues, make up 
 your mind concerning the following: (a) Is each issue 
 distinct from every other one? (b) Are they all, taken 
 together, adequate to lead you to infer the main resolu- 
 tion from themf (c) Are they properly supported? 
 
 This brings us to the question of support. In Lesson 
 13 (pages 233-237, especially), it was explained that an 
 opinion is supported either by facts which it properly 
 generalizes, or by other opinions wdiicli are acceptable 
 and from which it can be inferred. Observe that in the 
 type brief, issue A is supported by opinions 1, 2 and 3. 
 Each of them, in turn, is derived from other statements, 
 (a) and (b). These last statements rest on facts of some 
 sort. In the cases of A, 1(a) and A, 1(b) the facts are 
 enumerated in the fact column, but in the cases of A, 3(a) 
 and A, 3(b), the facts are not enumerated, though the 
 source of the opinions is recorded. If we accept the word 
 of Worcester and adopt his opinion, well and good; but 
 if not, the facts of the case should be looked up. Inci- 
 dentally, it is a bad policy to adopt the opinions of others 
 without getting the facts which influenced them. 
 
 It is now clear that the inference column is made up 
 of a series of propositions which hang together so as to 
 lead logically to an acceptance of the main resolution. 
 Every one of these propositions should be tested in the 
 same manner as the first one aiad its issues. 
 
284 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 The facts in the second column slioiihl be abundant. 
 Furthermore, the source column must contain the names 
 of witnesses and sources so that the acceptability, credi- 
 bility, and conditions of observation may be passed upon. 
 The place where the evidence is to be found should be 
 noted in sufficient detail to enable others to get it readily 
 and read it in context. 
 
 For faults in reasoning, carefully read the inference 
 column ; to discover lack of facts, read the fact column ; 
 and to check up authorities and sources, consult the last 
 column. This form of brief provides not only an orderly 
 form-arrangement of material but also a basis of 
 criticism. 
 
 2. Floor Tactics 
 
 It is one thing to have a clear line of reasoning in your 
 own head and quite another to keep it clear in the heads 
 of your hearers. Argument is above all others the form 
 of discourse in which you must impress not only the final 
 effect or conclusion, but also the steps by which that con- 
 clusion is reached. For this reason the speaker must, 
 from beginning to end, be especially simple and clear. 
 There must be no unnecessary ornamentation which 
 might tend, in the slightest degree, to obscure the struc- 
 ture of the entire speech. As each point is presented, 
 explained, and proved, it must be fully driven home and 
 then its exact place in the line of reasoning insisted upon. 
 Such connectives as these will abound: ''Having 
 proved," etc., "let us next," etc., ''If this be indeed so, 
 then it naturally follows," etc. In short, an abundance 
 of connectives must be used to make the relationship of 
 the parts of the whole structure clear. 
 
 Then also, frequent repetitions and summaries are 
 necessary. As one announces an issue and then goes into 
 the details of proof, the listener is apt to forget the 
 larger bearing of that issue as his mind is engaged in 
 
ARGUMENTATION 285 
 
 approving- or rojecting tlic evidence. Consequently, after 
 a contention is established, it should be restated and then 
 related to the next. The ideal is for the debater to keep 
 the whole contention clearly in mind as he takes up each 
 detail, justifies it, and places it in the whole scheme. 
 
 In handling figures, be careful not to bewilder the 
 audience. It is unwise to read off formidable lists of 
 statistics with items extending into six- or more places. 
 The mind cannot retain or grasp the significance of great 
 sequences of numbers. The better procedure is to say 
 something like this: *'The report of the government 
 shows that such and such a country sent to the United 
 States an average of 500,000 barrels of sugar each year 
 for a period of twenty years before the tariff was 
 imposed. After that the exportation dropped to a little 
 less than 100,000 barrels. These are round figures; the 
 exact amounts I have if they are wanted." Be clear, and 
 at the same time make it evident that your information 
 is exact and trustworthy. A comprehensive grasp of the 
 import of a mass of figures is to be offered rather than 
 the befuddling figures themselves. Many things which 
 can be taken in by the eye from the printed page cannot 
 be received by the ear from spoken language. 
 
 3. Burden of Proof 
 
 Eemember that ''he who asserts must prove." This 
 old adage simply means that one who asserts something- 
 new — not yet generally accepted — has the responsibility 
 of demonstrating its acceptability. While we know that 
 there are many things quietly received without question 
 as the established and true order of the universe, which 
 will some day be shown to be unacceptable, still we realize 
 that they do have all the presumptions in their favor and 
 one who would assail them must fight. One who main- 
 tains that some established thing is wrong or who states 
 
286 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 a totally new idea, must undertake the task of proving 
 his assertions. It will not avail him to assert and re- 
 assert; he must prove. A speaker who is advancing an 
 argument bears such a burden of proof. If he succeeds 
 in educating his hearers and leading them to reason as 
 he reasons, he is said to have successfully carried the 
 burden and shifted it to one who would deny his 
 contentions. 
 
 Therefore, in an arginnent, be careful of what you 
 assert. Make no wild assertions prompted by bitterness 
 or dissatisfaction, which you cannot prove by a calm 
 weighing of evidence. Advance_Qi ib" those cont entions 
 about A vhich you hav e adequat e knojv vledgei then go about 
 establishing them in an inexorably logical manner. Obvi- 
 ously an honest man who is a clear thinker, will be sparing 
 in his assertions and bountiful in the evidence to support 
 what he does assert. 
 
 While the unflinching acceptance of the responsibility 
 to prove may seem hard, there is this consolation — you 
 can put an opponent's nose to the same grindstone. If 
 one opposed to you makes a wild, unsupported statement, 
 do not deny it; simply point out that it is an unsupported 
 assertion which cannot be fairly accepted until demon- 
 strated. If you should say, ''It is false," you yourself 
 have made an assertion and assumed the responsibility 
 to prove it false. But if you simply call for proof, you 
 clearly throw the burden on him and assume none your- 
 self. Just as you will be careful in making your own 
 assertions, so also you will be careful not to assume 
 unnecessary burdens by branding other people's asser- 
 tions as false, but you will show the unacceptability of 
 unsupported statements, thus making clear the burden an 
 opponent must bear. Sometimes, when you have over- 
 whelming evidence against his assertion, you may be 
 willing to deny and then advance your destructive argu- 
 ment, but even then it would be better policy to call for 
 
ARGUMENTATION 287 
 
 proof and bring forth your lieavy guns only after hv liad 
 wasted his time witli refutable argnments. 
 
 4, General Bearing 
 
 Finally, preserve a bearing of fairness and calm. One 
 who reasons must not be excited and he must not seem 
 excited. Prejudice, bitterness, hatred, and other strong 
 feeling not only tend to befuddle the thinking of the 
 speaker but they also give the audience the impression 
 of partisanship and bias. Of course, if you are talking 
 to those who hold the same views as you and do not need 
 to be convinced, get as bitter, indignant, and excited as 
 you please ; but in such a case, you are not arguing, you 
 are exhorting. Where argument is necessary, calm is 
 necessary. 
 
 This admonition is not at all intended to disparage the 
 natural enthusiasm which goes with strong, forceful 
 delivery. There is a great difference between the force 
 resulting from the stimulus of interest and intense appli- 
 cation, and the emotional outburst which is fanned by 
 ])rejudice and intolerance. If the audience gets the 
 impression that your feeling is stronger than your judg- 
 ment, your argument will be weakened in their eyes. 
 
 In meeting an opponent and in addressing a strange 
 audience, always be most courteous and more than fair. 
 One who argues contends against fallacy, not against 
 persons; he deals in truths, not in personalities. His 
 preparation consists in thorough, patient research; his 
 floor generalship consists in control of himself. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 Tlic written exercises in this entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in your' notchook. 
 
 First Day. — Find in the Congressional Record or some book of 
 speeches, or even in some magazine article, an argument. 
 
288 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Read it carefully and then east it in the brief form described 
 in this lesson. Place this brief in your notebook, with an 
 appended criticism of possible Aveaknesses. 
 
 Second Day. — Carefully study the type brief and note (a) 
 whether any particular argument in the first column is 
 logically weak, (b) if there is any statement not fully war- 
 ranted by the facts ottered opposite it, and (c) where 
 arguments are directly from authority. 
 
 Third Day. — Recast all the material in the type brief in a new 
 brief using the following as the main issues : 
 
 A — Retention of the Philippines will benefit the United 
 States. 
 
 B — Retention of the Philippines will benefit the 
 Philippines. 
 
 C — Retention of the Philippines will benefit the civilized 
 world. 
 
 Fourth and Fifth Days. — Formulate a proposition on any subject 
 on which you have convictions and to the facts of which you 
 have access. Gather the material as thoroughly as possi])le 
 and construct a good brief. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowled;i;e of tlie principles in this lesson. They 
 are sin/fiefifirc merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. How does a technical brief differ from a simple outline? 
 
 2. What is meant by a real proposition, in contradistinction 
 to one which is logically unreal? 
 
 3. In the introduction, why do we give first a general 
 survey, then detailed facts, etc. ? Is there any principle of 
 procedure here? Is there a gradual focusing and narrowing of 
 the attention? 
 
 4. Is there any set way of determining just what the main 
 issues of a given proposition should be ? Can the same opinion 
 be established by dividing it in different ways and summing up 
 each division with its own proposition ? Can you cut up a pie 
 in more than one way ? 
 
 5. Why is it well to restate the main proposition just before 
 taking up the details of proof? 
 
 6. Why should every entry in the inference column be in 
 the form of a complete proposition ? 
 
 7. What are the tests to which any proposition may be 
 subjected ? 
 
 8. Why is it unwise to adopt the opinions of others with- 
 out checking up the facts to which they had original access ? 
 
 9. What do we mean by connectives which may be used 
 during delivery ? What is their importance in the argumentative 
 form of discourse? Do they promote beauty in other forms of 
 composition ? 
 
 10. Are repetitions and summaries of much value in a 
 debate or straight argument ? 
 
 11. What is the ideal to be attained in the presentation of 
 a mass of statistics to an audience ? 
 
 289 
 
290 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 12. What do you mean by the burden of proof? 
 
 13. Do yoii know of cases in real life where people who 
 are proposing new things act as though they did not expect to 
 bear the burden of proof? 
 
 14. Is it well to make sweeping denials of the assertions of 
 opponents when they are not properly supported? What is a 
 better policy ? 
 
 15. What is your ideal of the general bearing of one who is 
 trying to convince by appeals to the judgment? Is any other 
 kind of appeal logical? Does the recognition of the value of 
 calm logic in any way overlook the possibility of other kinds' 
 of appeal? 
 
y' 
 
 LESSON 16 
 
 THE APPEAL TO ACTION 
 
 As a practical success in the world of men, the 
 speaker is judged according to his skill in moving others 
 to action. To sway the multitude — that is the pinnacle 
 of eloquence. What avails a beautifully modulated 
 voice if its pleadings alter not the course of human 
 events! Why convince men if the beliefs implanted 
 work themselves not out in deeds? One who speaks 
 pleasingly, who marshals his ideas clearly, and yet who 
 cannot secure action, falls short of oratorical effective- 
 ness. In this lesson, we shall consider the aspects of 
 speaking which are most closely connected with the 
 obtaining of action from the hearers. 
 
 1. Nature of Action 
 (a) Conscious Action 
 
 All actions are movements in response to some exciting- 
 cause or stimulus. This cause may be outside the indi- 
 vidual, as a concrete situation which he faces, or it may 
 be an image or idea arising in his own mind. To put 
 it another way, a man seeing a cigar in a store window 
 has a train of ideas started by the sight of that cigar, 
 which leads him to go in, buy it, and finally smoke it; 
 or, while in his office, he may get the notion that a 
 cigar would be very gratifying and consequently send 
 out for one to smoke. 
 
 Again, a man may come into a room, sit at his desk, 
 and then, feeling a draft, close the window. This is the 
 291 
 
K 
 
 292 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 direct result of the real stimulus of the cold air. On 
 the other hand, he might imagine the possibility of the 
 draft and, because of that mental state, close the win- 
 dow before actually feeling any inconvenience. 
 
 Yet these two causes of action are essentially alike, 
 for w^hether prompted from without or within, the mind 
 does have a notion of an existing situation, a notion of 
 a possible alternative and a desire to secure the more 
 preferable state. The end in view Works itself out in 
 action. We call such acts, where the person is aware 
 of the stimulus and the fact that he is acting, conscious 
 acts. 
 
 ^ When a speaker wishes his hearers to perform a 
 conscious act, he does not, as a rule, have a concrete 
 external stimulus. Rather does he, by means of w^ords, 
 arouse suggestive ideas in the minds of his hearers. 
 By calling up stimulating images, by outlining truths, 
 and by drawing logical conclusions, he puts the powder 
 of action, a sort of explosive force, into their minds just 
 as w^ell as if he could lead them to a place to witness the 
 very things about which he talks. He makes them see 
 ' ' with the mind's eye. ' ' Notice the following appeal taken 
 from Thurston's speech urging intervention in Cuba: 
 
 The pictures in the American newspapers of the starving 
 reconcentrados are true. They can be all duplicated by the 
 thousands. I never before saw, and please God. I may never 
 again see, so dep'oi'al)le a sight as the reconcentrados in the 
 suburbs of Matanzas. I can never forget to my dying day the 
 hopeU'ss anguish in their despairing eyes. Huddled about their 
 little bark huts, they raised no voice of appeal to us for alms 
 as we went among tluMii. * * * 
 
 Men, women, ami cliildrcu slaud .silent, r.-unishiiig with 
 hunger. Their only appeal comes IVoiii llieir sad eyes, Ihrough 
 which one looks as thi'ough ;in ()|)i'n window iiil(^ llieii- agonizing 
 souls. 
 
 The Government of Spain has not appropi'inted and will 
 not appropriate one dollar to save these people. They are now 
 being attended and nursed and administei-ed to by the charity 
 of the United States. Think of the spectacle ! We are feeding 
 
THE APPEAL TO ACTION 293 
 
 those citizens of Spain ; Ave are nursing tiieir sick ; we are saving 
 such as can be saved, and yet there are those who still say it is 
 right for us to send food, but we must keep our hands off. I 
 sav that the tini(> luis come when muskets ought to go with the 
 
 n.nd! 
 
 AMieii Thurston himself saw^ the starving reconcen- 
 trados, he felt like taking up arms against Spain. In 
 liis speech, in the Senate, lie tries to arouse the images 
 lie actually saw, in order that the senators might vote 
 to declare war. 
 
 (h) Unconscious Action 
 
 Nature is wdser than any of her offsprings. She has 
 developed in each creature the means of reacting in 
 certain fundamental ways necessary for its continued 
 existence, even without its being aware of the stimulus 
 or need for action, and, in some cases, without its 
 realizing that it has moved, when the response has 
 actually taken place. Let us give a few concrete 
 examples. 
 
 Of all the extreme cases of unconscious action, hello- 
 tropism of flowers was the first observed by man. It 
 was seen that sunflowers and others would turn toward 
 the light (Greek — lielios, sun, and trope, a turning). 
 Later it was discovered that some animals were also 
 heliotropic. Upon the appearance of light, they would 
 move in its direction like automata, performing com- 
 plicated movements of locomotion with no choice or 
 consciousness of their own. Other tropisms have been 
 found. For instance, sAvarms of flies must, of necessity, 
 head against the w^ind ; while on the other hand, locusts 
 move with the wind, heading away from the direction 
 from which it comes. The lady-beetle and the star fish, 
 when placed on a verticle surface, automatically begin 
 to climb in an upward direction; they cannot go dowai 
 nor rest quietly. Certain crayfish and shrimps will 
 
294 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 liead toward. tlie positive pole of an electric current in 
 the water, just as lieliotropic animals move toward the 
 light. 
 
 How far human beings are affected in this manner 
 by external forces is not definitely known. It is prob- 
 able that we have various tropisms. Certainly a brief 
 description of them prepares one to understand other 
 unconscious and dimly appreciated acts very common 
 to us all. Just as external, physical circumstances 
 determine tropisms, so also instincts which are inherited, 
 fix almost as completely the course of our conduct in 
 certain situations. It is instinctive to flee from danger. 
 Confront a man— certainly a child who has not learned 
 higher forms of control— with a dangerous thing and 
 the instinctive impulse is to flee. It is instinctive to 
 repulse that which is distasteful and to try to acquire 
 that which seems good. These and other tendencies are 
 born in us ; they are handed down through the race. A 
 person needs only to be confronted with a situation 
 and the instinctive response takes place without reflec- 
 tion and sometimes without a realization of the action 
 itself. 
 
 The reflex is the next higher in the scale approaching 
 conscious action. It is not an inherited tendency but 
 is built up during the life of an individual, through 
 •practice. The eye winks when a foreign body ap- 
 proaches it, and the hand of a man reading a book 
 will flick a fly from the face without once interrupting 
 the complete absorption of the mind in the interesting 
 contents of the printed page. Again, the body as a 
 mechanism appropriately meets a situation without both- 
 ering consciousness. At first, reflex acts— like those 
 mentioned, the movements in walking, playing a musi- 
 cal instrument, and many others — were the results of 
 deliberate thought, but continued practice made them 
 mechanical. 
 
THE APPEAL TO ACTION _ 295 
 
 Similar to this, is the idiomotor act, in wliicli a notion 
 promptly sets off an active response. A child on April 
 first will say, ''Oh, see the bug on your arm," and then 
 shout, "April fool!" as you make a frantic sweep of 
 the hand to brush off an insect which never existed. 
 Here the flash of thought "bug on arm" sets the mech- 
 anism into characteristic response, without reflection. 
 Only after the act is completed is one aware that he 
 has acted. 
 
 Every man is a bundle of action tendencies, the 
 nature of which is determined by surrounding, physical 
 conditions to which he must turn (tropism) in a certain 
 way; by what his ancestors did and implanted in him 
 at birth (instinctive tendencies) ; by what he himself 
 repeatedly did during his life till the things became 
 mechanical (reflexes and settled habits) ; and by what 
 he approved again and again through repeated action. 
 If a speaker attempts to move his hearer in a manner in 
 harmony with this bundle of tendencies, he can, as a 
 rule, succeed quite easily, but if he proposes something 
 counter to them, his task will indeed be difficult. About 
 this we shall speak at greater length later. Just now we 
 can classify acts into three groups of service to us — a 
 classification which can be understood because of the 
 introduction just completed. 
 
 1. The act stimulated by the speaker may be uncon- 
 scious and determined by inherited and acquired 
 tendencies on which he played. 
 
 2. The act may be a conscious but impulsive response 
 to an attractive end proposed by the speaker. 
 
 3. The act may be a deliberate and selective response 
 in which the action is made in a certain direction w^itli 
 the mind fully aware of other possible courses to be 
 pureued. 
 
 Before discussing these, we may say that all the 
 considerations under the first must be present and be 
 
29G EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 reckoned with by the speaker when dealing with the 
 second, and all the principles bearing on the second are ' 
 applicable also in stimulating a selective action. 
 
 2. Speaker's Influence over Mechanical Responses 
 
 A speaker who can play on primitive and deeply 
 imbedded tendencies can get a favorable inclination to 
 almost anything he may propose and even definite 
 responses in the form of concrete acts. What are his 
 tools or methods f 
 
 1. His personal influence is the first force brought 
 into play. The magnetic speaker, both because of his 
 general attractiveness and the particular earnestness 
 he shows in a given cause, carries his hearers with him. 
 He has them as in a spell and they move with him in 
 thought, feeling, and deed. They do not reason out 
 that they like liim, or that, because he is worthy of 
 confidence, they will therefore do as he proposes; they 
 simply turn toward him and follow his suggestions 
 without thought. So long as he is there to influence 
 them by his presence and his voice, they are his to 
 command. Such influence is of greatest service when 
 immediate action is wanted. It tends to diminish in 
 power when an interval of time comes between the 
 speech and the occasion for action. It is a help to the 
 preacher pleading for a big contribution to be made on 
 the spot, to the salesman trying to close a contract, to 
 the military captain just before the charge, to the foot- 
 l)all coach in the dressing room between the halves. To 
 just the extent a speaker can impress his personality on 
 others, this inHuence will hold over and have effect after 
 a laxjse of time, but in all cas(\s its maximum effect is 
 felt during delivery. 
 
 How is such an influence to be developed ! The prin- 
 ciples involved and the practical method steps are 
 
THE APPEAL TO AC^TION 297 
 
 outlinod in Lesson 8, undor tlio headings, "Personality," 
 ''Confidence," ''Self-Control," and "Tact." 
 
 2. Repcdicd mass aciio)i is a meclianical device for 
 moving an andience. Tlirongh it, a gronp of individuals 
 may be weld(Ml into a mass responsive to the will of a 
 leader. Eevivalists use it often. First the choirmaster 
 has everybody sing. Then all others remain quiet while 
 those in the front half and to the right carry a stanza; 
 the second stanza is taken up by those in front and to the 
 left while all together sing the chorus. Then follows 
 singing by various groups all over the house, alone and 
 in various combinations. The choirmaster has all doing 
 his will and following his lead. They are in a respon- 
 sive state. Then on comes the revivalist himself. He 
 continues the response by getting silent agreements with 
 obvious truths. Then he obtains a show of hands on 
 this or that question. He gets those who were converted 
 before the age of ten to stand, then those who came at 
 twenty, and so on. By means of rhetorical questions 
 which permit of only one answer (silent to be sure) 
 and direct questions calling for movements, he gets 
 the whole audience responsive to him. The whole situa- 
 tion is favorable to action which he will suggest, though 
 most of those present do not realize the process by 
 which they were brought into line. Only the coolest 
 and strongest willed individuals can hold out. 
 
 The more intellectual the audience, the smaller the 
 chance for success by these tactics. They are of service 
 only when the response can be made then and there. 
 A religious revival does little, as a rule, to establish 
 new courses of conduct; its great value lies in the fact 
 that it stimulates an initial step. The steady work of 
 a pastor is necessary to conserve the results obtained 
 by the evangelist. 
 
 The auction sale is another example of the impel ling- 
 force of repeated mass action. A man goes to an auction 
 
298 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 with no intention of buying. He sees article after article 
 bought; he timidly enters the bidding; he gets into the 
 habit of responding and finally "gets the fever" so that 
 he eagerly bids on everything that is put up. 
 
 In deliberative bodies, where voting goes on as a matter 
 of routine, responses tend to become mechanical. This 
 is especially true toward the end of a session. One 
 who is wily, who senses the tendency to pass everything 
 and who wishes a resolution to prevail, will make his 
 motion unobtrusively, have it quietly seconded and go 
 through on a "sleepy vote." If, however, he speaks in 
 support of his proposition, he will break the spell. Then 
 to secure its passage he must work for intellectual assent 
 rather than the mechanical, approving response. 
 
 Nomination speeches and addresses in favor of patri- 
 otic resolutions are often carefully planned to "sweep 
 the hearers off their feet." A series of approvals is 
 arranged. The speaker draws applause for this and 
 applause for that. Gradually he leads up to applause 
 of the final and desired proposal. It is during this final 
 burst of enthusiasm, made possible by the skillful order- 
 ing of those which, preceded it, that the vote is taken. 
 Here, as in the other cases, it is clear that the action 
 taken is a blind one and not the result of meditation nor 
 even a single clear notion. Tlie method can be success- 
 ful only when the outlet in action is immediately present. 
 
 3. The Impulsive Act 
 
 The impulsive act is the result of the successful 
 impress of a desirable end on the mind of the hearer. 
 The speaker wants something done. He presents it so 
 as to attract attention and arouse interest. The atten- 
 tion nmst be kept on the act until it is actually accom- 
 })lished, if it fades from the mind and something else 
 crowds in to hold the center of the mental stage, the 
 act will not take place. Therefore, the first care of the 
 
TITF. APPEAL TO ACTION 299 
 
 speaker is to present the act and wliat it will hi'ini;-, in 
 a clear and forceful niannei'. For a discussion of 
 interest and attention, review Lesson 4. 
 
 Bnt not only must the act to be performed be held in 
 the center of attention; it must be of a character to 
 stimulate an emotional set favorable to the course to be 
 l)ursued. One might propose a climb up a mountain 
 on a hot day, but the bare thought is so distasteful that 
 it is banished from the mind promptly and no action 
 takes place.XBut if some' attractive feature, such as a 
 cooling breeze on the top, the far view^, and some rare 
 fruit or berries to be had there and only there, is held 
 out, the feelings aroused in response are positive so 
 far as action is concerned, and not negative. "Anything 
 in harmony with instinctive and acquired tendencies 
 (some of which are common to all men) or in accord 
 with special tastes wall stimulate these positive or fav- 
 ():able emotional responses wdiich drive on to action. 
 Attention cares for the nature and direction of the 
 action ; feeling gives the impulse. 
 
 Notice the way in wdiich Daniel Webster makes John 
 Adams plead for the signing of the Declaration of 
 Independence : 
 
 "The war, then, must go on. We must figlit it through. 
 And if the war must go on, why put off longer the declaration 
 of independence? That measure will strengthen us. It will 
 give us character abroad. The nations will then treat with us, 
 which they never can do while we acknowledge ourselves sub- 
 jects in arms against our sovereign. Nay, I maintain that Eng- 
 land herself will sooner treat for peace with us on the footing 
 of independence, than consent, by repealing her acts, to acknowl- 
 (Hlge that her whole conduct toward us ha.s been a course of 
 injustice and oppression. * * * 
 
 "The cause will raise up armies; the cause will create navies. 
 The people, the people, if we are true to them, will carry us. 
 and will carry themselves gloriously through this struggle. I 
 care not how fickle other people have been found. I know the 
 people of these colonies, and I know that resistance to Priti.sh 
 aggression is deep and settled in their hearts, and cannot be 
 
300 EFFECTIVE PI.tbLIC SPEAKING 
 
 eradicated. Every colony, indeed, has expressed its willingness 
 to follow, if we but take the lead. Sir, the declaration will 
 inspire the people with increased courage. Instead of a lon^ 
 and bloody Avar for the restoration of privileges, for redress of 
 grievances, for chartered ininumities, held under a British kin^-. 
 set before them the glorious object of entire independence, and 
 it will breathe unto them anew the breath of life. 
 
 "Read this declaration at the head of the army; every sword 
 will be drawn from its scabbard, and the solemn vow uttered, to 
 maintain it, or to perish on the bed of honor. Publish it from 
 the pulpit; religion will approve it, and the love of religious 
 liberty will cling around it, resolved to stand with it, or to fall 
 with it. Send it to the public halls ; proclaim it there ; let them 
 hear it who heard the first roar of the enemy's cannon; Id 
 them see it who saw their brothers and their sons fall on the 
 field of Bunker Hill, and in the streets of Lexington and Concord, 
 and the very walls will cry out in its support." 
 
 AVe may tabulate our conclusions. To arouse impul- 
 sive action, the speaker must present the stimulus so 
 as — 
 
 1. To awaken interest; 
 
 2. To bold attention; 
 
 3. To draw forth emotions favorable to the action 
 proposed. 
 
 What Constitute Facorahle Feelings? — The passage 
 just given stimulates feelings of hope, courage, and 
 elation. As the speaker proceeds, be builds up confi- 
 dence. Those listening catcb tbe spirit; their hearts 
 beat strongly and their breathing is deep and exhilarat- 
 ing. Physically and emotionally they are machines of 
 assurance. The act proposed is represented as (a) in 
 harmony with inherited instincts of self-preservation, 
 desire for power, desire for redress; (b) in line with 
 special existing political and economic aims; and (c) 
 likely to be successful. The last is dwelt on most fully. 
 
 For a similar appeal to action, read once more Henry 
 Clay's conclusion of tbe speecb in favor of the AVar of 
 1812, in Lesson 6, page 99. Notice that in the Clay 
 peroration, not only is confidence stimulated but hatred 
 
THE APPEAL TO ACTION 301 
 
 of England is worked up by insinuation and direct 
 statement. 
 
 If primitive passions can be aroused strongly enough, 
 assurances of success are unnecessary, for a blind for- 
 ward plunge will come with strong feeling, and there 
 is no thought of consequences. 
 
 "We not only act when our whole being, physical and 
 mental, inherited and acquired, flows positively toward 
 the end proposed, but we also respond negatively when 
 we see that failure to act will bring punishment or 
 retaliation. Note the following skillful appeal of Henry 
 Clay to Congressmen to send an expression of sympathy 
 to Greece in her struggle for independence: 
 
 "But, sir, it is not for Greece alone that I desire to see this 
 measure adopted. It will give to her but little support, and 
 that purely of a moral kind. It is prmcipally for America, for 
 the credit and character of our common country, for our own 
 unsullied name, that I hope to see it pass. What, ]\Ir. Chairman, 
 appearance on the page of history would a record like this 
 exhibit? 'In the month of January, in the year of our Lord 
 and Savior 1824, while all European Christendom beheld, with 
 cold and unfeeling indifference, the unexampled wrongs and in- 
 expressible misery of Christian Greece, a proposition was made 
 in the Congress of the United States, almost the sole, the last, 
 the greatest depository of human hope and human freedom, the 
 representatives of a gallant nation, containing a million of free- 
 men ready to fly to arms, while the people of that nation were 
 spontaneously expressing its deep-toned feeling, and the whole 
 continent, by one simultaneous emotion, was rising, and solemnly 
 and anxiously supplicating and invoking high Heaven to spare 
 and succor Greece, and to invigorate her arms, in her glorious 
 cause, while temples and senate houses were alike resounding 
 with one burst of generous and holy sympathy — in the year of 
 our Lord and Savior, that Savior of Greece and of us, a propo- 
 sition was offered in the American Congress to send a messenger 
 to Greece, to inquire into her state and condition, wdth a kind 
 expression of our good wishes and our sympathies — and it was 
 rejected ! ' 
 
 "Go home if you can, go home if you dare, to your constitu- 
 ents and tell them that you voted it down ; meet, if you can, the 
 appalling countenances of those who sent you here and tell them 
 
302 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 that yoii shrank from the declaration of your own sentiments; 
 that you cannot tell how, but that some unknown dread, some 
 indescribable apprehension, .some indefinable danger, drove you 
 from your purpose ; that the spectres of cimeters and crowns 
 and crescents gleamed before you and alarmed you ; and that 
 you suppressed all the noble feelings prompted by religion, by 
 liberty, by national independence, and l)y humanity^ I cannot 
 bring m.yself to believe that such will be the feeling of the 
 majority of the committee. But, for myself, though every friend 
 of the cause should desert it, and I be left to stand alone with the 
 gentleman from Massachusetts, I will give to his resolution the 
 poor sanction of my unqualified approbation." 
 
 Here we find a clever combination of positive and neg- 
 ative stimuli. Clay arouses the positive emotions of 
 sympathy, religious fervor, and national pride while he 
 negatively seeks the proper vote by arousing anticipated 
 fear of the constituents' displeasure and shame at the 
 charges of cowardice and sordid self-interest. 
 
 Nature of the Stimulus. — The stimulus used by the 
 speaker may be either the image (see Lesson 9), the 
 concept (see Lesson 11), or the argument (see Lessons 
 13, 14, and 15). As an image of a certain desirable thing 
 flashes up in the mind and holds the attention, it may 
 bring a favorable emotional state and produce action. 
 So also as a notion of right, justice, etc., grows, 
 it may result in deeds. Certainly arguments to estab- 
 lish opinions are very often the antecedents of actions. 
 The speaker carefully selects these units of thought and 
 welds them together so as to touch off the desired action 
 most effectively. 
 
 Now it must be said that, as a rule, impulsive acts 
 result from the realization of concrete images rather 
 than abstract ideas or propositions. Certainly it is true 
 that an impulsive response is most likely to take place 
 if the stimulus touches off fundamental, deep-lying ten- 
 dencies. As the tendencies become less primitive, or 
 biological, and more intellectual, they are less likely to be 
 stirred into im])ulsive response. 
 
THE APPEAL TO ACTION 303 
 
 4. Selective Action 
 
 The selective action implies conscious choice and 
 decision. There is a clear willingness to act. In the 
 mechanical response, deepdying forces of nature, largely 
 Ijhj'sical, cast the deciding vote, and the body acts with 
 no conscious direction from the mind. In the impulsive 
 i-esponse, these forces are also very powerful, but the 
 thinking and feeling mind is also awake and aware of 
 the attraction or repulsion and the consequent action 
 in this direction or that. In the selective action, how- 
 ever, the mind is the final determining iactor ; it is not 
 assailed by a force driving it on to one course of action 
 before any resistance can be begun; it is fully aware 
 of two or more possible lines of conduct. "While, old 
 tendencies and impulses may be stronger than judg- 
 ment and have their way, in selective action there is 
 a decision, a conscious inclination in one direction 
 rather than in another. Recently the Italian Cabinet 
 had to make a choice — to remain neutral or take part 
 in the great European conflict. A man suddenly met 
 and insulted on the street, usually has no choice. His 
 whole nature either drives him on against his tormentor 
 or away in craven retreat. If the same man, like Italy, 
 had time to consider and weigh the matter, there would 
 ])e a chance for comparison and choice. 
 
 But what shall be compared or contrasted? That 
 depends on the level of the hearer's intelligence and what 
 the circumstances require to be placed before him for 
 consideration. Possibly two images arise with their 
 attendant emotions'. There is a struggle, and the man 
 acts out the suggestion of one rather than the other. 
 Dld-fashioned ministers used to present vivid images 
 of blistering hell and visions of blissful glory. They 
 moved their audiences by associating faith and conduct 
 witli heaven and lack of these things with hell. There 
 
304 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 was no argument to prove that sucli places really did 
 exist or that they were logically connected with the 
 acceptance of a particular creed or the carrying-out of 
 certain ideals of life. The assault was on the imagina- 
 tion by means of vivid images. 
 
 Action may also be influenced by a similar exalting of 
 a particular concept, or general ideal, over alternative 
 ones. An argument can also be advanced as the basis 
 of a definite action. In these last two cases, the feelings 
 which spring up with the thoughts in the mind are not 
 vivid emotions, but rather calm, settled sentiments. If 
 we expound a belief to a man so that it is acceptable, 
 or arg-ue a proposition so that it is proved, as the basis 
 for action, we have laid a strong and permanent founda- 
 tion; but no stimulus of an exciting nature is likely to 
 be there. Such concepts and beliefs, when fully accepted, 
 are hard to shake and will almost invariably work out 
 in action when an occasion arises, but not necessarily 
 in speedy action. 
 
 The mechanical response and impulsive action must 
 be immediate. The stroke nuist be made when the iron 
 is hot. On the other hand, the selective action, based 
 on thought and reason, may take place long after the 
 initial impression was made, for such impressions grow 
 deeper and more potent with reflection; the stimulus 
 to action is slow, steady, persistent. Emotions are fleet- 
 ing; sentiments are abiding. 
 
 Finally, it is possible to be convinced that this or that 
 thing is true or this or that act wise, yet not feel the call 
 for personal response — for exertion by you yourself. 
 One might tell of atrocities in tlie Congo and prove them 
 and yet get no active response from an American 
 audience. The thing might be looked upon as an aca- 
 demic and impersonal matter. Therefore, a speaker 
 trying to stimulate a selective act, based on reason, 
 must go a stej) beyond j^troving the desirability of action ; 
 
THE APPEAL TO ACTION 305 
 
 he must connect it with his hearers' personal welfare 
 and happiness. He must make them believe that they arc 
 affected and will benefit by the act proposed. Their wel- 
 fare ranges all the way from physical well-being to mental 
 peace due to the thought of a lofty and unselfish deed 
 well done. The higher the type of man appealed to, 
 the wider is the field of personal interest, the less ego- 
 tistic the point of view and the more altruistic. Indeed, 
 the nobler men will act readily upon lofty, abstract 
 ideals of conduct even wdien such action is counter to 
 their material welfare. Here is where the speaker must 
 judge his auditors for himself and no one can help 
 him. What shall be his level of appeal! Of help in 
 this connection is the discussion of "Tact," beginning 
 on page 145 of Lesson 8. 
 
 (<7) The Persisting Stimulus 
 
 When an action cannot be performed immediately and 
 the speaker wants his ideas and feelings to arise again 
 and again in his hearers' minds, he must implant some 
 permanent reminder. He must put a barb in his arrow 
 so that it will stick and prick from time to time. The 
 best barb is an apt epithet that cannot be forgotten. 
 Henry Clay, speaking for high tariff, called it the 
 "American System" in opposition to the "British Col- 
 onial System." That was a fine tag. The words stuck 
 and everyone was enthusiastic over the "American 
 System;" indeed, who could fail to approve and Avho 
 could forget a system so named and held in mind I 
 Another good barb was Webster's "Liberty and Union." 
 We all remember John Hay's denunciation of "Dollar 
 Diplomacy" and now Bryan is hit with the epithet club 
 of "Shirtsleeve Diplomacy." For a long time Roose- 
 velt was successful when his projects came under the 
 magic head of "A Square Deal," and he suffered severely 
 
306 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 when some one pinned to him the persistent expression, 
 "Big Stick." The writer remembers how a college 
 speaker who was urging the students to have all their 
 dances formal — with dress-suit necessary — killed the 
 movement for informal dances by calling them ''Shirt- 
 Waist Dances." All these expressions are catchy and 
 suggestive as well. Once caught, they cannot be for- 
 gotten and, being in mind, they influence conduct. 
 
 The persistent epithet is valuable also in creating 
 public opinion — in spreading a certain attitude and 
 tendency to action. The women teachers of New York 
 City repeated in many speeches the phrase, "Equal pay 
 for equal work!" Now who could resist that slogan? 
 They got a scale of wages with men teachers and 
 women teachers on an equal basis. Charles Sumner 
 kept abolition sentiment alive in the North with his 
 "Crime Against Kansas" and "Slavery Sectional, Free- 
 dom National." James G. Blaine owed his defeat for 
 the presidency to a certain extent, to the unfortunate 
 expression, "Eum, Eomanism, and Rebellion," as a 
 characterization of what the democratic party stood for. 
 In that case the expression acted as a boomerang. 
 
 5. Direction Summary 
 
 If you wish a certain action, make up your mind what 
 the general tendencies of your audience are, the partic- 
 ular ideals and special motives which hold in the 
 present case, then determine : 
 
 1. Is the proposed action in harmony with the 
 fundamental tendencies of most people? Then make 
 the most of tliat asjx'ct to stimnlalc a mechanical or 
 impulsive I'esponse. 
 
 2. Has this particular audience any settled habits of 
 action in reference to you or the course proposed? Do 
 they look upon you as a leader or one who should be 
 
THE APPEAL TO ACTION 307 
 
 obeyed? If so, order them, and depend upon tlie linl)it 
 of response. Is the thing proposed a natural or routine 
 tiling for them to do? Tlien propose it as a matter of 
 course and look for habitual disposition. 
 
 3. Can you connect the proposed end with some 
 settled ideals, notions, or j^rejudices which they have? 
 If so, make the most of the proper aspects and get the 
 weight of existing tendencies behind your action. 
 
 4. Can you make the end appear new and intrinsic- 
 ally attractive? Then do so, dwelling on the emotion 
 evoking aspects, striving for impulsive response. 
 
 5. Is it necessary to prove rather than assert the 
 desirability of the end proposed! Do so, but only when 
 necessary, for meditation is the foe of immediate action. 
 If you must prove, do it well. (See Lessons 13, 14, 
 and 15.) 
 
 6. If an interval must come between the stimulus of 
 your speech and the act proposed, try to devise a 
 persistent and stimulating brief summary of your 
 suggestive and impelling idea. 
 
 Assignment op Work 
 
 Tlic written cxcicisos in this piitiro lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in j'our notebook. 
 
 First Daij. — Read the lesson at least twice and then make a 
 topical outline of it. jNIaster its contents thoroughly. 
 
 Second Day. — Read again what was said about tropisms and 
 also about the effect of a speaker's personality on an aud- 
 ience. Then list all the possible external influences which 
 you can think of wliicli affect the listener's response whether 
 lie knows it or not. 
 
 Third Dinj. — Read again what was .said about inherited tenden- 
 cies. Beginning with (1) the tendency to seek nourish- 
 ment and (2) the tendency to sexual acts of reproduction, 
 make a list of all the tendencies which, to you. vseem inher- 
 
308 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ited by all men and which the.y are strongly moved to act 
 out under appropriate stimulation. 
 
 Fourth Day. — List settled ideals and prejudices common to most 
 Americans. Combine the lists of the second, third, and 
 fourth days. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Outline a speech designed to secure a definite 
 action. Precede the outline with an analysis of the particu- 
 lar audience you imagine. List the springs to action the 
 audience hag. Tell the make-up of the audience and then 
 enumerate : 
 
 1. Possible external influences; 
 
 2. Inherited tendencies ; 
 
 3. Settled habits of routine action ; 
 
 4. Settled prejudices and ideals Avhicli can be connected 
 with your particular purpose. 
 
 Addiiiuual Tasl\ — Whenever you read speeches proposing ac- 
 tions, analyze the appeals in the manner given above. Do 
 this very often and write out such an analysis of a speech, 
 from time to time, in vour notebook. 
 
 I 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 TIr'sso qiU'sstioiia are for tho stmlent to use in tcstinj? 
 liis knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are fiiifirirstirr merely, dealing largely with the ])ra('tical 
 api)licati()n of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 iKitoliook for future reference. 
 
 1. What is the rank of a speech urging to action, in the 
 oratorical scale of values? What is the popular notion of the 
 high-water mark of oratory? 
 
 2. Is there such a thing as unconscious action? Among ani- 
 mals ? Among men ? 
 
 ;3. What is meant hy tropism? Are human beings tropic? 
 
 4. What is an inherited tendency? What is a reflex? What 
 is a habitual action ? 
 
 5. How does conscious action differ from unconscious re- 
 sponse ? 
 
 6. What are the possible stimuli to action? What agency 
 does a speaker employ? Are words as influential as real situa- 
 tions ? 
 
 7. What influence has a speaker over unconscious responses? 
 
 8. What are the essential features of an impulsive action? 
 How are the emotions affected? 
 
 0. Has attention anything to do with action? If so, what? 
 
 10. Has interest anything to do with action? 
 
 11. Of images, concepts, and proved beliefs, which is the; 
 strongest stimulus to immediate action? Which tends to guar- 
 antee the surest action ? 
 
 12. What are the essential features of selective action? 
 
 13. Do ideals and judgment affect selective action as nnich 
 or more than inherited instincts ? - Is there a rule to be applied 
 to all people in this respect? 
 
 309 
 
310 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 14. What is meant bj' the persisting stimulus '! Can you name 
 others besides that given? 
 
 15. Would an advertising man or a salesman profit by read- 
 ing this lesson ? Would a teacher or parent ? Would a fore- 
 man or boss of other men ? 
 
 16. What relation does this lesson bear to the previous les- 
 sons ? to lesson 3 for example ? or lesson 8 ? or 9 ? or 12 ? Could 
 you prepare an outline of the course showing the relation of 
 each topic and lesson to the whole and to each other ? 
 
 17. What material treated thus far in this course would you 
 put into a course in Personal Efficiency? 
 
 18. What from this course would you put into a popular 
 text on applied psychology? 
 
LESSON 17 
 
 SPEECH MATERIAL AND ITS PREPARATION 
 
 Tims far we have discussed the material of a speech 
 as made up of images, concepts, judgments, and argu- 
 ments, and we have shown how each may be presented, 
 how each may be demonstrated as representing an exist- 
 ing actuality, and how each may be used to provoke 
 feelings and acts of various sorts. All this implies that 
 the materials used by a speaker — the ideas symbolized 
 by his words — may be divided and subdivided along 
 psychological lines. 
 
 Now, however, we wish to make another sort of sub- 
 division — one which recognizes that part of this various 
 material used by the speaker is very directly limited to a 
 particular speech, while part of it is general in character. 
 One portion is the heart of the particular message itself, 
 while the other portion is a kind of general filling or 
 explanatory accompaniment. Every speech contains a 
 mixture of these two ingredients, and the speaker must 
 discover them — must make them come to mind. The act 
 of bringing forth the images, ideas, and arguments was 
 known by the ancient writers as * * invention. ' ' But inven- 
 tion is not possible in the case of a particular speech 
 without some previous preparation. Furthermore, the 
 preparation which brings forth the specific subject-matter 
 is different from the preparation which bears the general 
 fruit. In this lesson we shall explain the nature and 
 purposes of these two kinds of matter and indicate 
 methods of preparation for their invention. 
 
 :^11 
 
^ 
 
 ^^ 
 
 p^ PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 1. Specific Matter and General, Matter 
 
 The following passage from William Wirt's Eulogy of 
 Jefferson and Adams (delivered October 9, 1826, in the 
 House of Representatives) will serve to illustrate, within 
 the limits of a paragraph, the two kinds of matter which 
 are presented to an audience : 
 
 Man has been said to be the creature of accidental position. The cast 
 of his character has been thought to depend upon the age, the country, 
 and the circumstances in which he has lived. To a considerable extent, 
 tile remark is, no doubt, true. CroniM-ell, had he been born in a republic, 
 luight have been guiltless of his country's blood; and, but for those civil 
 commotions which wrought his mind into a tempest, even Milton might 
 .have rested "mute and inglorious." Tlie occasion is, doubtless, necessary 
 to develop the talent, whatever it may be; but the talent must exist, in 
 the embryo at least, or no occasion can quicken it into life. And it 
 must exist too imder the check of strong virtues, or the same occasion 
 that quickens it into life will be extremely apt to urge it on to crime. 
 The hero who finished his career at St. Helena, extraordinary as he was, 
 is a more common character in the history of the world than he who 
 sleeps in our neighborhood, embalmed in his country's tears, or than 
 tliose whom we have now met to mourn and honor. 
 
 The direct thought expressed by the orator in this 
 passage is somewhat as follows: Although time, place, 
 and occasion have much influence in determining a man's 
 character, still, to develop great talent, an embryo of 
 greatness must first exist; furthermore, true greatness 
 requires that talent be checked by virtue. This specific 
 message, however, is very compact and difficult to under- 
 stand for the first time in the form just stated by us. To 
 make the meaning more open and clear, to adapt it to the 
 particular audience, general, illustrative matter is called 
 into service. Wirt's first principle, that circumstances 
 tend to develop the man, is made concrete by recalling 
 the lives of two men — Cromwell and Milton, Similarly, 
 Napoleon is a particular illustration of the truth that 
 talent unchecked by virtue results in evil. On the other 
 hand, AVashington is a noble type where talent and virtue 
 go hand in hand. Now these happened to be the illustra- 
 tions chosen l)y Wirt. But lie could have found others. 
 No matter. Whatever he might have found and might 
 
SPEECH IMATERTAL 313 
 
 liavo iis(m1 would liave been drawn from liis general stock 
 of information and would have been used to make clear 
 a particular thought. 
 
 To the particular audience AN'irt was addressing, it was 
 perfectly clear that Washington was meant by 'Mie who 
 sleeps in our neighborhood, embalmed in his country's 
 tears." But these references to great men do not 
 exhaust the general material drawn upon by the speaker. 
 The very use of such expressions as ''republic," "guilt- 
 less of his country's blood," "those civil commotions," 
 and "embalmed in his country's tears" imply a very 
 extensive and versatile mentality and give some hint of 
 the vast general field upon which the speaker drew. 
 Indeed it is almost impossible to express the simplest 
 thought Avithout calling into use many supplementary 
 ideas in the light of which its meaning is made clear. The 
 very related nature of our knowledge makes it necessary 
 for us to express a single idea in terms requiring informa- 
 tion of many others. 
 
 No doubt we have explained the nature and i)urpose of 
 these two kinds of matter; next, one might ask in what 
 proportions they occur. This varies in different sorts of 
 speeches. In eulogies, commencement addresses, and 
 occasional speeches of all kinds, the general matter, as a 
 rule, preponderates; but in technical, legal, and argu- 
 mentative speeches, the specific matter is of greater 
 importance. 
 
 2. General Material 
 
 It was no doubt a realization of the importance of the 
 general matter which made the ancients insist that the 
 public speaker should be a man who had mastered all 
 human knowledge. "While today we do not require such 
 an enormous prerequisite, we do believe that the orator 
 should be a man of exceptionally wide, general informa- 
 tion and a complete master of the particular topic on 
 
314 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 which he expresses a direct message. This ineans that 
 a man's general preparation must have given him wide 
 culture, while his specific preparation for a particular 
 speech must have equipped hnn to speak with authority 
 on a definite subject. 
 
 Of the necessity and advantage of broad culture which 
 renders its contributions of general information, there 
 can be no doubt. It enables a speaker to think more 
 clearly on any particular subject which he may wish to 
 discuss. We often hear it said that this is the age of. 
 specialization and that the mair^K) would succeed must 
 know one thing thoroughly. AJ^ery true, but it is also 
 true that the broader the man's culture, the better able 
 he is to -become a specialist in some limited field. His 
 information gained from wide experience prepares him 
 to see a particular subject in its proper proportion and 
 in relation to other things. With this sense of relation- 
 ship there comes the possibility of keener analysis. See- 
 ing the bearing upon his immediate subject of a consider- 
 able field of human knowledge, the man is able to 
 recognize points of likeness and difference which would be 
 obscured to a less widely informed person. But not only 
 does general culture improve one's thinking on a particu- 
 lar problem ; it also aids in the expression of the results 
 of that thinking. It provides many illustrations and 
 equivalent forms of expression to meet the varying needs 
 of individuals in the audience. 
 
 This matter of expression leads us to turn our atten- 
 tion, in passing, from the influence of general information 
 upon the mental power of the speaker to its influence 
 upon his style. What a person thinks and what he says,- 
 as well as how he says it, are most intimately connected. 
 AVhenever a speaker attempts to illustrate or amplify an 
 idea, he reveals his limitations and colors his message. 
 The engineer may have to restrict his illustrations to the 
 field of engineering; the doctor talks in terms of illness 
 
SPEECH MATERIAL 1115 
 
 and drugs; the nature poet gets his similes from the 
 iiowers of tlie phi ins and the torrents of the mountains. 
 Fortunate indeed is he who is at home in all fields. The 
 more catholic his taste, the better for him as a speaker, 
 and the better for his audiences. Richness of style comes 
 from breadth of general resource. 
 
 The speech of a cultivated gentleman abounds in 
 pleasing and illuminating references to works of the 
 world's best literature, to the wonders of nature, to the 
 joys and sorrows of the human heart. The many sources 
 from which he draws his illustrations enable him to appeal 
 to minds of various natures and capacities. Deficiency 
 here is sometimes so telling in its effect that a specialist 
 in a particular branch is unable to communicate his 
 expert knowledge to others. Many a clever and profound 
 engineer has failed to impress others because he knew 
 engineering only and could not make his ideas plain to 
 those who did not have particular knowledge identical 
 with his own. Such men not only lose in pleasingness ; 
 they also lose in simple lucidity. 
 
 (a) General Preparation 
 
 How to acquire the general material, how to retain 
 impressions from many experiences, and how to system- 
 atize those experiences, is the problem of general educa- 
 tion. What is acquired represents the whole man, 
 intellectually. We cannot here outline an entire system 
 of education calculated to develop the well-rounded man. 
 Yet a few special hints with reference to the special needs 
 of a speaker may be given with propriety. 
 
 1. The sense perceptions should be increased and the 
 special senses trained. In Lesson 9, page 163, we 
 remarked that many people are one-sided in their sense 
 development, that some are impressed with the sight 
 elements of a total situation, some with the sound ele- 
 
316 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKLXG 
 
 ments and so on. Read once more pages 163 to 167 for 
 metliod directions for sense-training. 
 
 Travel when possible and observe accurately all with 
 which you come in contact. Very often it is well to 
 recline quietly in the evening, when alone, and try to 
 revive the impressions of the day, gained in new 
 surroundings. 
 
 2. Study men, not only as an exercise in sense percep- 
 tion, but also for the ideas and ideals they express. 
 Cultivate acquaintances and encourage those whom you 
 meet to talk about the things they know best, sympathetic- 
 ally responding to their enthusiasm about the hobbies 
 they love. Through the conversation of others, much is 
 learned about external facts and a keen insight is had 
 into the feelings of human beings. Of course, modes of 
 expression are there also for observation and analysis. 
 
 3. Then the speaker should not forget the great com- 
 pany of silent friends, his books. They present the whole 
 range of knowledge, arranged, classified, and expressed 
 by masters. Like friends, they should be selected witli 
 care and appreciated for their worth; their excellencies 
 sliould be separated from their faults and emulated. 
 
 4. All this observatioii and study of observable and 
 readable things must be supplemented hj careful criti- 
 cism. Accept only what is verifiable as fact and valid 
 as reasoning. See Lessons 13 (especially the pa.ssage 
 beginning on page 245) and 14. 
 
 5. It is difficult to say just what books are most neces- 
 sary for general reading. President Eliot, of Harvard, 
 has prepared a list of l)ooks which may be held on a shelf 
 five feet long and which, he says, give an adequate treat- 
 ment of the essentials of a liberal education. We shall 
 not give a list here but suggest that the student apply to 
 his instructor for advice wdiich will meet his individual 
 needs. No man who wishes to be a good speaker should 
 ever cease his systematic I'eading. General preparation 
 
SPEECH MATERIAL 317 
 
 is never at an end; it goes on as long as lifo continues. 
 Physical growth has its restricted period, but mental and 
 spiritual enrichment has no limits. 
 
 (h) Ai-ailahilifij of Geueral Material 
 
 All this general mass of riches, gathered from personal 
 observation, conversation, or reading, must be readily 
 accessible. It cannot be *' crammed" for an occasion. It 
 must be slowly acquired, digested, and thoroughly 
 absorbed, so that it is a part of the man himself and 
 impregnates all his thoughts both as to nature and 
 method. During delivery all this matter comes to hand 
 without conscious effort. The speaker does not pay great 
 attention to this explanatory, filling-in, or embellishing 
 part of his speech, he is free to concentrate on the line of 
 his direct and specific message. The intellectual sub- 
 stance of the man flows forth to sustain and make clear 
 the particular thought of a definite sx)eecli. 
 
 It has been suggested that the speaker keep a collection 
 of general facts and materials by means of a card cata- 
 logue or other filing device, so that the accumulations of 
 a lifetime may be preserved in an orderly form. The 
 suggestion, though, springs from a misconception of the 
 use to which a speaker puts '^the accumulations of a life- 
 time." He draws from this fund to illuminate the 
 immediate topic of his discourse, on the spur of the 
 moment, during actual composition — an operation which 
 requires the matter to be stored in his head and not in 
 some pigeonholes or in a card cabinet. To be sure, it is 
 desirable for him to make use of a modern well-catalogued 
 reference library while engaged in an exhaustive study of 
 the special subject of a particular speech, but the general 
 fund of information, with its accompanying attitude 
 toward life (not to be confused with the special facts of 
 an immediate topic) is useful only so far as it can be 
 
318 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 spontaneously drawn upon during the process of delivery, 
 or composition. 
 
 What a wretched substitute would a card catalogue be 
 for such an acquisition, embedded in the very personality 
 of the man ! No speaker can foresee wlien he may have 
 to draw upon this source, and one who has laboriously 
 looked up his illustrative material will «be at a loss for 
 resources when he most needs them during delivery. 
 Consequently, we conclude that instead of having a card 
 catalogue to help out in this manner, the speaker must 
 have an excellent memory; not the parrot-like memory 
 of certain facts and incidents, but a cultivated retention 
 of ideas grouped according to their relationships and 
 bearings upon the problems of life. The ability to retrin 
 incidents and truths in a definite functioning scheme is 
 best acquired by meditation upon everything experienced. 
 Nothing should be thought of in an unrelated manner, but 
 the mind should be exercised in the habit of grasping 
 everything new with a full consciousness of its relation 
 to the old. Such a mind beco*nes a veritable wellspring 
 of facts and intellectual, aesthetic, and ethical ideals 
 from which the orator brings forth his sparkling ideas. 
 No card system can meet the requirements. 
 
 3. Special Material 
 
 While the general material of a speech cannot well be 
 looked up fo'F a particular address, the special informa- 
 tion or immediate topic must be consciously prepared and 
 deliberately acquired with its use in view. Or, at least, 
 it must be deliberately reviewed, verified, and arranged. 
 Success here does no-t necessarily reflect culture, but it 
 does indicate accuracy and secures for the speaker the 
 hearing due to an authority. Of course, if the speech is 
 to be made on a topic included in a man's life-work, then 
 the special looking up is reduced to a minimum. Nearly 
 
SPEECH MATERIAL 319 
 
 every one has heard of Webster's coiimieiit that if Hayne 
 ]ia(l written a speech especially (lesigiied to be refuted 
 by all of Webster's years of study and meditation, he 
 could not have succeeded better than he did in his effort 
 which called forth the famous ''Reply." 
 
 However, such complete preparation for a particular 
 address, ready at hand, is the exception rather than the 
 ruh\ Even experts in certain fields prefer to look up 
 their material and go over it carefully before they give 
 it utterance. It is a good rule never to speak impromptu 
 (without having prepared the direct line of thought in 
 advance) except when circumstances make escape impos- 
 si])le. While a mistake in literary reference, clumsiness 
 ill expression, or even a violation of the usage of good 
 grammar may be charitably overlooked, or forgiven, a 
 misstatement of any of the important special facts of an 
 address cannot be allowed to pass unchallenged. 
 
 Exactly what will constitute the special matter depends 
 u])on the purpose of the speech in a given case. It is the 
 matter on which the speaker fastens his attention when 
 planning a speech with a definite end in view. He believes 
 that such-and-such material will make the desired impres- 
 sion. He will be sure to put that on record, no matter 
 how he may pad it out, illustrate it, and adapt it to the 
 audience before him. 
 
 (a) Method of Research 
 
 The preparation of the special material should be most 
 thorough. It should insur.e completeness and accuracy. 
 
 1. Personal observation is most satisfactory. Its 
 weakness is one of limitation in scope rather than trust- 
 worthiness. While making your personal research, 
 answer in a satisfactory manner the following questions : 
 
 (a ) Am I competent by equiymient and training to make 
 trustworthv observations ? 
 
820 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (b) Have I planned a systematic order of investigation 
 
 which will insure thorough exploration of the 
 
 field? 
 
 Then start gathering your material making notes in an 
 
 orderly manner. Be careful to separate observed facts 
 
 from inferences. (See Lesson 13, pages 233 and 234.) 
 
 Later in this lesson (page 322) we shall describe a form 
 
 of note-taking for reading research which may be used 
 
 for the recording of direct observations. 
 
 2. Conversafion with authorities in a given field is 
 next in value. It is superior to the consultation of writ- 
 ten reports because questions to remove misunderstand- 
 ings are possible, and the man consulted can amplify this 
 or reduce the time given to that according to the needs 
 of the investigator. Li other words, the information is 
 sought from the viewpoint of the investigator and not 
 some general notion of popular demand. 
 
 Of course the men consulted must be weighed in the 
 balance which is prepared for all witnesses. (See 
 Lesson 13, page 240.) 
 
 3. Systematic readhifi may be undertaken according 
 to the following plan : 
 
 (a) Make as complete a bibliograpliy as you can. This 
 list of books may be compiled as follows : 
 I. Go to the card catalogue in the library to which 
 you have access, and under the general title 
 of the subject and all allied subjects, list the 
 available books, with the names of the 
 authors and the publishers and years of pub- 
 lication. For instance, you are preparing a 
 speech on Lal)oi- Unions and th(» Laws. 
 You look up Labor Union and the allied 
 subjects of Trade Unions, Labor, Work, 
 Strike, Lockout, Workman's Compensa- 
 tion, Lijunctions, Sti'ikes, Lockouts, I>oy- 
 cotls, etc. TTndcr cacli of llicsc heads, 
 
SPEECH MATERIAL 321 
 
 you will find various books by various 
 authors. List them as directed. The names 
 of the authors will be the next line of inves- 
 tigation. Finding that Sidney Webb wrote 
 The Histonj of Trade Unionism, you consult 
 the author's list and see what other books 
 he wrote in the same general field. Under 
 Webb you will find Industrial Democracy 
 and many others. List all these. Later, as 
 you read these books, you will find references 
 to others which you may have missed. For 
 instance, in the sections of the Report of the 
 Industrial Commission which deal with labor 
 legislation, you may find reference to Stim- 
 son's Handbook of the Labor Laws of the 
 United States. List all such books. 
 
 It is well to make your bibliography in 
 card form, with a card for each book, as 
 follows : 
 
 Title of Book 
 
 Autlior 
 
 Publislieis Date . 
 
 Remarks on nature, etc 
 
 II. After exhausting the book literature, take up 
 the magazine literature of the subject in the 
 same way. Look up each general subject, 
 subsubject, and author in Poole's Index and 
 the Eeader's Guide, reference works which 
 keep the articles in all the good magazines 
 indexed up to the last month. Make a card 
 bibliography for magazine articles in a way 
 similar to that just suggested for books, sub- 
 stituting for "Publishers," ''Name of Maga- 
 zine Date Page. ' ' 
 
 It pays to put much time on compiling a 
 
322 P]PFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 bibliograpliy before starting tlie reading. 
 One is often enabled to get the best works in 
 the best order, thus saving much duplication 
 and unprofitable work. 
 
 (b) Before reading books through, it is well to read 
 
 carefully the index or chapter heads of several 
 books. Indeed, a careful investigator will put 
 the titles of all the chapters of each book on the 
 back of its bibliography card. This step also 
 saves some unnecessary reading and often guides 
 the course of the reading in a most profitable 
 manner. 
 
 (c) Note-taking should also proceed systematically. A 
 
 loose-leaf book should be used. Head each page 
 with the title of the book or magazine, the 
 chapter or article, the page, and the author. In 
 some cases, even minute subdivisions of informa- 
 tion may be given separate sheets w^ith appro- 
 priate headings. After all notes are taken, they 
 can be removed from the book cover and rear- 
 ranged to the best advantage. This makes pos- 
 sible the bringing together of all the information 
 obtained from all sources, on a given point. 
 It is only after a most thorough, special preparation, 
 through observation, interview, and reading that a 
 speaker begins to plan his speech. For simple plans, see 
 Lessons 1 and 2. For more general plans, see Lesson 6, 
 page 86, and for elaborate detailed planning, see the brief 
 in Lesson 15, pages 273 to 284. 
 
 The special preparation is good in pi'oportion as it 
 gives the speaker authoritative mastery of all the details 
 of the matter about wliicli he is speaking. Of course, a 
 busy man in the rush of life is often called on to make a 
 speech when he cannot i)0ssibly prepare the material in 
 a perfect manner. AVell, he must do the best he can under 
 the circumstances, but lie will soon discover that it is 
 
SPEECH MATERIAL 323 
 
 better not to speak at all than to speak when entirely 
 nnprepared. 
 
 4. Conclusion 
 
 "We hope that it has been made clear in this lesson that 
 hard work is the foundation of success in speech-making 
 as in other branches of human endeavor. There is no 
 royal road, a lifetime must be given to general improve- 
 ment, and for each speech the special preparation must 
 be adequate. To be born with the ''gift of gab" is no 
 great blessing unless the "gift of capacity for hard work" 
 goes with it. One who speaks readily but has no thoughts 
 worth expressing is as a sounding brass and a tinkling 
 cymbal. Furthermore, fatal facility has been the cause 
 of more than one downfall. The empty word-maker may 
 last for a short while, .but truth lives forever; one cannot 
 find the truth to give it voice, without effort in painstaking 
 preparation. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The wiitte'ii exercises in this entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Select some well-known speech that appeals to yo-i 
 and write it out in full. Take such a speech as Patrick 
 Henry's Appeal to Arms, Webster's Bunker Hill Orafio)i, 
 Wendell Phillips' Toussaint L'Ouverlurc, or Bryan's Cross 
 of Gold. Then make a skeleton statement of its direct 
 thought, thus separating the specially prepared matter from 
 the general matter. When this is done, count the special 
 references, and departments of information which appear 
 in the general matter. 
 
 Second Day. — Turn to an encyclopedia and note the brief 
 account of ''The Battle of Bunker Hill," "The Sinking of 
 the Maine," "The Life of Lincoln." "Andrew Jackson," 
 and other subjects which appeal to you. Select one of these, 
 
324 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 and using the encyclopedia article as the material of your 
 direct message, write out an interesting and readable speech 
 on the subject. In doing this, do you find a wealth of general 
 matter ready at hand to help you illuminate and embellish 
 your message? 
 
 Third Day. — Carefully analyze your speech and determine the 
 points of strength and weakness in your general preparation. 
 Is your knowledge of one field the only thing you have to 
 lean on? How may you enlarge and enrich your general 
 stock of ideas? 
 
 Fourth Z>a^.— Get the Eliot list of books or any other good list 
 and check off those you have read. Then plan yourself a 
 course of reading, seeking breadth rather than specialization 
 in. one line. 
 
 Fifth Day.— Start a record book of new things you learn by 
 observation, conversation, and reading. This is not so miich 
 a storehouse for future reference as a means of informing 
 you when you are falling behind and of encouraging you to 
 systematic enrichment of your mind. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 Those questions are for the student to use in testing 
 liis knowledge of tlie principles in this lesson. 'Ilicy 
 are sufrf/cfitirc merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What is meant by special matter or direct message .' 
 
 2. AVliat is meaut by general matter? 
 
 3. What (lid ancient, rhetoricians mean by the term 
 "invention" ? 
 
 4. IIow broad should the general information and interests 
 of a public speaker be? Is there any relation between the width 
 of his intellectual view and the effectiveness lie would have with 
 many audiences of varying character? 
 
 5. Which would you rather have, general knowledge of 
 many subjects or a thorough knowledge of one subject ? ]\Iust 
 you make a choice ? Cannot the two go hand in hand ? How 
 are they mutually helpful ? 
 
 6. Can you make out a schedule of lines of improvement for 
 general preparedness? 
 
 7. Have you ever heard of the five- foot bookshelf before? 
 Have you seen the list of books included? Have you read any 
 of the books? 
 
 8. How useful would a card catalogue of general material 
 
 be? 
 
 9. What would you call the index of thorough, general 
 [)reparation ? 
 
 10. Has a brief any relation to special material? 
 
 n. What are the three sources of special material mentioned 
 in this lesson ? 
 
 12. What are the steps in concentrated reading up for the 
 special material ? 
 
 18. What is the best system of note-taking? 
 
 14. Is there any relation between hard work on subject- 
 matter and success in speech-making ? 
 825 
 
326 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 15. Who Avas William Wirt? Croi^well? Hayne ? Eliot? 
 JMilton ? Toussaint L 'Ouverture ? 
 
 16. How would you go about it to gather material on the 
 following subject : St. Helena ? Labor Unions ? Lockouts .* 
 Bunker Hill ? Lincoln ? Jime Apples ? 
 
 17. What books do you like to read? Why? Do you keep a 
 record of the books you read? Would it not be worth doing? 
 
 18. Do you know anyone with "the gift of gab"? Has he 
 the "gift of capacity for hard work"? 
 
y 
 
 LESSON 18 
 
 ATTENTION OF THE SPEAKER AND OF THE AUDIENCE 
 
 All who have endured dreary sermons will agree that 
 it would be well for every speaker to study methods of 
 holding the attention of the audience. But the need for 
 the cultivation of the speaker's own attention to what he 
 is doing, is not so obvious. Yet many faults of delivery, 
 faults which irritate the audience and embarrass the 
 speaker himself, are directly traceable to variations in 
 his attitude toward different aspects of delivery. Ram- 
 blings and digressions are clearly the results of poorly 
 regulated attention. So also are many parentheses and 
 retracings of the line of thought. The inaccurate use of 
 words as well as over-attention to words to the detriment 
 of the development of the thought, reflect bad economy 
 in the matter of attention. Indeed there are many things 
 of this kind which may well be considered by a speaker, 
 since they will reveal the necessity of organizing the 
 attention along satisfactory and efficient lines. 
 
 1. General Nature of Attention 
 
 No one has defined attention in a thoroughly satisfac- 
 tory manner; yet all agree upon the existence of certain 
 aspects. We shall not take time to settle the exact nature 
 of this mental state from a psychological point of view, 
 but we shall describe some of the undeniable aspects 
 which are of vital importance to the speaker. 
 
 One cannot discuss the subject at all Avithout first 
 assuming a self and a non-self — that is, a person and 
 
 827 
 
328 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 something to which the person may attend. The self is 
 the mind, and the object attended to is whatever the mind 
 is thinking about in a conscious manner.^ 
 
 This thinking mind is assailed with a multitude of 
 objects which compete for its attention. There are 
 sounds to be listened to, thousands of them, some loud 
 and some low ; sights to be viewed ; smells to be sensed ; 
 and furthermore there are springing up from within, 
 thoughts and feelings not immediately connected with 
 things outside. What shall the mind attend to at a given 
 time! What shall it select to take in, or what will force 
 its way in whether the mind wants to choose it or not! 
 As a speaker talks, he can give varying degrees of atten- 
 tion to various things. Will he watch his audience most 
 carefully, will he regulate his speech in a precise manner, 
 will he concentrate on his train of thought? 
 
 As we have already hinted above and as was implied 
 in the lesson on action, stimuli which assail the mind and 
 compete for attention may be external — as books, pic- 
 tures, people and all kinds of tangible objects — or, as 
 mental processes and thoughts, they may spring from 
 within. Just as the very apparently outside objects are 
 attended to by the mind, so the thoughts are atte^'iJed 
 to in a similar manner and never confused with the self. 
 To put it concretely for a speaker, he can attend to his 
 train of reasoning just as well as he can attend to the 
 expression of a listener's face. In short, it is possible 
 to attend to real things and to ideal things, to what is 
 physically before us and to what is in the mind only. 
 
 To the innumerable candidates for the center of atten- 
 tion, the mind makes responses in various ways. Some 
 
 iQf coiirso we know that it is (iiirn-ult to make a ]3sycliologically 
 corroct and scientific sej)aration of the niiiul from the materials it works 
 over. But ])ractical pood sense insists tliat tliere is a difference between 
 the thinking mind and wliat it is thinking abo\it — a difference between 
 the subjective self and the tiling (object) to which that self pays 
 attention. 
 
ATTENTION ;?29 
 
 things are given the very focus of attention itself, others 
 are less clearly taken in, some are but vaguely appre- 
 hended, and some never cross the threshold of attention 
 at all and are as though not existing. Concretely, a 
 speaker may remain utterly unconscious of a draft or a 
 flickering light on the platform, he may be faintly aware 
 of uneasy moving in the audience, while clear in the 
 center of his consciousness is the idea he is trying to 
 drive home. 
 
 The attentive mind may therefore be said to be divided 
 into zones. The central zone or focus has clear, sharp, 
 strong images and ideas, the contents of the next zone are 
 not so clear, while out at the edge impressions weaken 
 into nothingness. AA^e must determine just wdiat should 
 . be sharpest in the attention of a man during the delivery 
 of a speech — what should be in the focus, what should be 
 in mind but not in the focus, and what should be shut out 
 altogether, 
 
 2. Stages of Attention" 
 
 All attention is alike in that it is a condition which 
 brings about clearest mental content. But we can speak 
 of three stages or arrangements of circumstances which 
 promote this clearness and vividness of thought. The 
 first of these we may call involuntary attention, the sec- 
 ond, voluntary or selective, and the third, habitual. In 
 Lesson 4, pages 49 to 54, we spoke of the first two of 
 these kinds of attention, the involuntary and the volun- 
 tary, when we said that a speaker could, at the outset, 
 get the attention of his audience either by a sudden shock 
 (so that they involuntarily respond by attention) or by 
 promise of reward (so that they voluntarily set aside 
 other thoughts and concentrate on what is being said). 
 A third kind of attention is the habitual, in which one is 
 working with liis whole mind along a certain line so that 
 
330 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ho is immune from outside distractions. ^Ye have seen a 
 man so in earnest about making clear a pet idea of his 
 own that he noticed neither the amused smiles or indif- 
 ference of some, nor even the derisive snickers and ges- 
 tures of others. 
 
 1. Involuntary attention is the attention one is forced 
 to give to a thing because it violently thrusts itself in. 
 Thus a loud noise assails the senses so that we drop what- 
 ever else we are doing and attend to it. Any violent or 
 marked break in the existing order of things has this 
 effect. In a boiler^factory a sudden hush as the machin- 
 ery stops attracj:s' this sort of attention quite as well as 
 an explosiom^n a quiet, open country. Intense things, 
 strange things,, sudden things, all compel involuntary 
 attention. This attention is held just so long as the kind 
 of attraction mentioned lasts. Of course what is novel 
 or striking to one person may not be at all so to another, 
 and tiling, like all other mental matters, attention is per- 
 so^^i^^ike the impulsive act, involuntary attention is 
 gY^"$ontaneously and without reflection. 
 
 2. Voluntary attention, on the other hand, is the at- 
 tention we deliberately choose to give in the face of com- 
 peting bids. Other things may be present to distract, 
 but the attention stays fixed where the individual volun- 
 tarily determines it shall be. A speaker might tend to 
 lose heart in his task as he sees no progress with his 
 audience, but he can determine to stick to it, paying no 
 attention to the uncomfortable atmosphere. He may sud- 
 denly get a brilliant idea to present which would give him 
 great pleasure, but his better judgment says that it would 
 detract from the main message and he sets the tempting- 
 distraction aside voluntarily, in order to attend strictly 
 to what he had planned to say. 
 
 3. Habitual attention or settled attention comes when 
 one is so absorbed in the thing to which he is attending 
 that other things have no power to hold him. In invol- 
 
ATTENTION 331 
 
 initaiy attention, there is no struggle, for tlie strong- 
 impress of the object breaks through any semblance of 
 resistance on the part of the subject; in habitual atten- 
 tion the subject is still so strong and so settled in its 
 attention to the object that no other object has any power 
 of distraction. In neither case is the person aware of any 
 competition. 
 
 When the speaker or hearer is aware of a divergent 
 pull, then the attention given in one direction or the other 
 is voluntary. 
 
 3. Attextiox of the Speakek Dueixg Preparation 
 
 During the preparation of a speech, it is highly desir- 
 able that the speaker develop habitual attention. He 
 should engage in his research with such absorption that 
 nothing else can tear him from it. To his reading and 
 investigation he must give undivided and sustained 
 application. 
 
 Of course interest plays a large part. Interest is a 
 feeling of satisfaction or anticipation of satisfaction 
 experienced when dealing with that which, because of our 
 general tendencies or deliberate judgments, is pleasant 
 or desirable. What are then the interests of a speaker 
 which will start him on research and careful preparation 
 and lead to habitual absorption until the task is finished ? 
 They are : 
 
 1. Interest in the object to be attained by moving 
 the audience. 
 
 - 2. Interest in the welfare of the audience, which 
 
 can be secured through a thorough presentation of 
 
 the matter to be prepared. 
 
 3. Interest in the subject matter itself. 
 
 Unless one and preferably all of these interests exist, 
 
 the speaker will find his preparation great drudgery, and 
 
 he will break his application to it before the habit stagie 
 
332 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 of attention is reached ; furthermore, in most such cases 
 he has no business to speak at all, for he has no real pur- 
 pose or message. 
 
 If the desired absorption conies, then the mind is recep- 
 tive to a high degree to all things which are allied to the 
 matter at hand, and all other things are shut out. Here 
 of course we touch the matter of research for the special 
 material, referred to in the last lesson. It is astonishing 
 what can be produced when the searcher is thoroughly 
 wrapped up in his task. Lawyers beginning to look up 
 an interesting case soon settle down to sustained atten- 
 tion and will stay up all night going over evidence and 
 consulting the statutes ; scientists working out the details 
 of new discoveries neglect meals and are oblivious to the 
 passage of time; ministers planning sermons close to 
 their hearts concentrate on their preparation and neglect 
 all else. It is only in this state that the best result is 
 produced. 
 
 Furthermore this stage of attention brings with it 
 almost unlimited powers of sustained effort. Though 
 started by interests, when developed into a habit of con- 
 centration, exciting emotions and feelings subside and 
 a great degree of calm prevails. So also the physical 
 strain attendant upon sudden involuntary attention and 
 the strain of conflict in the voluntary, are absent. Con- 
 sequently muscular sensations and efforts as well as dis- 
 turbing feelings are not present to any considerable 
 degree, to produce fatigue. 
 
 But habitual attention to material cannot be secured at 
 a bound; one must school one's self to it. At first, other 
 things will tend to draw the speaker away from his books, 
 there are conflicts, and he gives voluntary attention to 
 the task at hand. A number of these viciories will pave 
 the way to settled, habitual attention to research matter. 
 The concentration of great minds is the result of long 
 schooling. Therefore if you discover that you skip from 
 
ATTENTION 333 
 
 one thing to another and are easily distracted, it is time 
 for yon to fight the tendency and guide your attention 
 by a knowledge of your best interests as a speaker and 
 a man. When the great victory is won and the habit of 
 hard work established, what can you not conquer? 
 
 4. Attention of the Speaker During Delivery 
 
 During delivery, the speaker is on the alert, in an 
 attentive state calculated to take advantage of any turn 
 of affairs. To his speech and all appertaining to it, he 
 pays voluntary attention. The central zone of greatest 
 clearness is held by the main trend Qf his thought. In the 
 zone of awareness are such things a^ the appearance and 
 actions of the audience, and incidental ideas which come 
 and go as he talks, but which do not divert him from his 
 planned course unless he chooses to be so diverted. 
 Then, in that event, the new, selected idea, for a time, 
 occupies the central zone and the previously planned mat- 
 ter is at the next degree of intensity, clearness, and 
 urgency in his mind. Distractions which threaten to 
 become serious obstacles are in a distant zone of indis- 
 tinctness, but the speaker is not so absorbed in his central 
 thought as to be unable to shift to them if they grow in 
 importance. To illustrate, suppose that a speaker is 
 proceeding nicely with his previously planned argument 
 clearly before him and he is unaware of the puzzled ex- 
 pression on the faces of some of those before him. He 
 must not be so absorbed as to permit that thing to go 
 unnoticed too long. He swings his attention to the fur- 
 ther zone, bringing out clear for a moment the distrac- 
 tion which was vague. Then if it is of a character to 
 warrant full attention, he lets his theme settle into second 
 place while the intruded situation is being disposed of. 
 Then again, he voluntarily elevates his main line of dis- 
 course to the first place. In other words, during deliv- 
 
 I 
 
334 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPExUvING 
 
 ery the speaker should be constantly exercising voluntary 
 attention, shifting the focus from item to item according 
 to the dictates of efficiency. 
 
 5. What Should Not Receive Conscious Attention 
 
 The delivery of a speech is a very complicated process 
 which involves the calling forth and ordering of ideas; 
 the association of appropriate words to express those 
 ideas ; the pronunciation of the words and the attendant 
 breathing, phonation and articulation; the association 
 and execution of expressive gestures, and the noting of 
 all the signs of receptivity on the part of the audience. 
 If one were to try to pay full attention to each of these 
 activities, none would be performed well. Nature has 
 helped us out so that, granted attention to some, the oth- 
 ers are set automatically in motion and take care of them- 
 selves. Let us enumerate those things which should be 
 below the threshold of attention and take care of them- 
 selves during speech delivery. 
 
 1. Breathing should not hold the attention of the 
 speaker. Correct habits of breathing should be estab- 
 lished so that the machine runs itself, just as the habit 
 of walking is such as to direct the walking while we are 
 thinking of all sorts of things except the movements of 
 our feet. During breathing exercises the movements of 
 the diaphragm and all the other mechanism should re- 
 ceive full attention (see Lesson 7) but this exercise must 
 have its effect on the habitual mode of breathing and that 
 habit should hold sway during delivery without engross- 
 ing the mind. If one is attending to his breathing, some- 
 thing is wrong and furthermore the expression of thought 
 is likely to be hampered. So also Posture should take 
 care of itself. Read once more pages 122-24, Lesson 7. 
 
 2. Vocahidary use or the selection of proper words in 
 a given place, should bo almost automatic. One who has 
 
ATTENTION 335 
 
 to pay attention to tlie choice of words is in need of vocab- 
 ulary building exercises. During such exercises, the 
 attention is primarily on them but during delivery, speech 
 habits should prevail. Yet here, to a certain extent, the 
 process of choosing words should be at the fringe of 
 attention, ready to spring to the center if difficulty is 
 experienced in finding adequate means of expression. If, 
 however, this difficulty is chronic, your vocabulary is 
 poor and you must do more work along the lines sug- 
 gested in Lessons 10 and 11. 
 
 3. Pronunciation also should take care of itself. But 
 like the choice of words, it may once in a while demand 
 the center of attention. 
 
 4. Gestures and attitudes take care of themselves. 
 We shall speak of this at some length in a later lesson. 
 Just now we may say that most gestures are part of the 
 physical adjustment which is a natural part of the feel- 
 ing or emotion experienced at a given time, and the 
 speaker is unaware of them. Of course awkward habits 
 of movement will show themselves whenever a gesture 
 is made. Such habits must be corrected by systematic 
 exercise, but not during -the delivery of a speech. As a 
 general rule it is not wise to plan gestures deliberately 
 and make them with conscious attention. 
 
 6. "What Should Receive Coxscious Attention 
 
 Conscious attention should be paid to the audience at 
 the second zone of attention while the development of the 
 main theme should occupy the focus. As we have inti- 
 mated, accidents of an external character or difficulties 
 with words and what not may distract the speaker and, 
 for a time, dethrone the theme from its high place, but 
 the crisis should be met and the arrangement first stated 
 nnist be returned to as the norm. 
 
 7. Attention to the Audience. As a rule this should 
 not detract from the development of the theme, but it 
 
336 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 must exist if the tlieino is to be truly developed for that 
 particular audience. The speaker must watch for ex- 
 pressions and signs of interest or inattention on the part 
 of the audience; he must note emotional states as well. 
 It is clear that he must fit his message to the minds before 
 him. Unless he attends in a sort of secondary way to the 
 indications they display, he cannot fit in the message 
 which holds his first attention. Of course he never for- 
 sakes his message or loses sight of the goal toward 
 which he is striving, but he does modify the manner of 
 reaching that goal according to the receptivity or resist- 
 ance of the hearers. Eead once more the Beecher selec- 
 tion on page 40, Lesson 3, and that of Garfield on page 33, 
 and note how their courses are directed with the emo- 
 tional state of the audience in mind. They must have 
 had an eye to that audience as well as to the message. 
 Read also the Beecher selection on page 216, Lesson 12, 
 and observe a similar tact with reference to the under- 
 standing rather than the feeling of the audience. 
 
 The reason why certain memorized speeches are so 
 poor and sound so stiff and artificial is largely this mat- 
 ter of paying no attention to the particular audience. 
 The speaker is absorbed primarily in the elocutionary 
 effect and secondarily in the recollection of the exact 
 words to be delivered. Such ''elocutionists" deliver as 
 though there were no audience, or they have a standard 
 delivery independent of any audience and kept the same 
 for all. 
 
 2. Attention to thr. Main ThoiKjht. This brings us 
 to the focus of attention and we sliall discuss the distrac- 
 tions which seek to usurp the place of the main theme as 
 planned, in the mind of the speaker. 
 
 Assuming adequate preparation, all the details of the 
 speech have been thoroughly impressed and they are 
 related and arranged in logical groups. It is not neces- 
 sary for the speaker to attend to these details. He has 
 
ATTP^NTION 337 
 
 his mind on the larger divisions of the plan. They are 
 clearl}^ in mind, and as he disposes of one, the next occn- 
 pies the center of his thoughts. As each of these divi- 
 sions is taken up, the well-impressed details spring read- 
 ily into place at the proper time. 
 
 It is important that the planning be fairly simple. 
 There are two things which will insure the correct ad- 
 justment of attention during delivery, and both come 
 when the preparation is thorough — the speaker should 
 be entirely interested in his matter, and he should be 
 very familiar with it. These, with good planning, are 
 sure to bring success. 
 
 When the speech is not progressing well, look for 
 safety in your plan, fix the attention on that plan and 
 bring the next subdivision clearly to mind; then work 
 toward its presentation. 
 
 3, Distractions. Stray thoughts often come to mind 
 and beguile the speaker into neglecting his main task. 
 The attraction may be in the form of an impulse to 
 express the newly inspired ideas to the audience or there 
 may simply be set up a train of thought wnich gets the 
 center of attention while the speech itself is carried in 
 the outer zone attention, in a perfunctory manner. AVlien 
 the first of these situations arises, the speaker, who is 
 using voluntary or selective attention, must make up his 
 mind whether the new idea can be fitted in with advan- 
 tage or not. If a clear gain is to be had, he makes the 
 insertion; if not, he sets it firmly aside and continues 
 along the appointed path. Of course the distracting 
 meditation must be killed at the outset. 
 
 Other distractions, already mentioned, such as move- 
 ments in the audience and difficulties with words, will be 
 met in the same manner. The ideal is to keep the general 
 end or purpose clearly in mind. Have the attention 
 firmly on the great divisions as planned, but be ready to 
 make improvements and adjustments according to- the 
 
338 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 exigencies wMcli may arise, using your ultimate goal as 
 the guide. 
 
 7. Attention of the Audience 
 
 It is the problem of the speaker to secure the attention 
 of his audience at the outset. In Lesson 4 we explained 
 methods of treatment for the introduction which would 
 bring the desired result. But we have already learned 
 that attention has a strong tendency to shift, and even 
 if one does capture the mind of the audience at the begin- 
 ning, there is no guarantee that it will be held through- 
 out. We shall now discuss the attention of the hearer 
 during the program of speech. 
 
 1. Understanding is the first requisite of sustained 
 attention. It will be noticed that in our plans for 
 speeches, we begin with general outlines easy to under- 
 stand and introduce technical difficulties only in a grad- 
 ual manner. A listener will not and cannot continue to 
 attend to what he does not understand. This is one of 
 the reasons why you can read a light novel through at 
 a single sitting but fidget over a difficult book of science. 
 It is hard to give prolonged attention to difficult matter 
 and almost impossible to that which is not understood. 
 The slightest failure to get the speaker 's meaning, show- 
 ing on the face of the listener, should be a signal to 
 recapture his attention by vocal emphasis or a novel 
 presentation of something easy which will pave the way 
 to a simple treatment of the hard passage. 
 
 2. Interest must be maintained. If the audience 
 ceases to ])e attracted by the novelty of ideas or the 
 rapid movement, or if they see no personal advantage in 
 listening; in short, if your speech does not appc^al so 
 as to obtain involuntary or voluntary attention, they will 
 let their minds take up other trains of thought just as 
 thougli you were not present. Many ministers Avould 
 
ATTENTION ;3:39 
 
 hv astoiiislied to learn liow many business deals were 
 })lanned diirini*' the ir abstract and uninteresting sermons, 
 and how many more new hats and dresses were com- 
 l)letely conceived to the subdued accompaniment of their 
 droning. 
 
 .1. ISlonotony in the presentation of a series of ideas 
 each in themselves interesting enough, and fiat vocal 
 expression, also kill attention. The first may take many 
 forms, chief among which are monotony of arrangement 
 and sameness of treatment. The sentences are all alike 
 and there is no life and sparkle to the composition. Vocal 
 monotony is similar in its deadly effect upon the audi- 
 ence. During delivery, the speaker should be animated 
 and constantly progressing in his treatment. The ennui 
 produced by monotony will show in the eye, and in the 
 attitude of the listener 's body. When that wilted appear- 
 ance is noted, the speaker must rally and make progress. 
 
 These three qualities, lack of meaning, lack of interest, 
 and monotony, negatively afi'ect the attention of the 
 audience. But there are other fa-ults which actively dis- 
 tract the attention of the listener and actually supply 
 him with other food for thought than the ideas expressed 
 by the speaker. 
 
 4. Peculiarities of speech, manner, and dress are dis- 
 tractions which take the attention from the main theme. 
 AVe know a college jjrofessor of anatomy who called the 
 spinal column the spinal "colyum," and his students 
 kept waiting for that word to pop out instead of attend- 
 ing to the content of his lectures. Another teacher had 
 the habit of saying, ''How many see?" all through her 
 explanations. The class was fascinated by this recur- 
 rent phenomenon and never ''saw"; tliey simply heard 
 the formula and waited for its certain repetition. All 
 speech peculiarities., dialects and idiosyncrasies will dis- 
 tract the attention of the audience. Have a friend note 
 your speaking and tell you if you have any annoying 
 
340 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 pet phrases, mispronunciations, or otlier noticeable devi- 
 ations from standard good usage. 
 
 Peculiar gestures and mannerisms, playing with ob- 
 jects while speaking, buttoning and unbuttoning the coat, 
 sipping water, clearing the throat, and a thousand other 
 possible eccentricities may detract from what you say. 
 Search out any such habits and try to eliminate them. 
 The attention should be on the thought you are develop- 
 ing, not on some intruded peculiarity. 
 
 Dress also has its influence. Loud clothes oi' unkempt 
 clothes will draw notice and occupy the mind of one in 
 the audience. An old lady once went to hear an art critic 
 deliver a most interesting address on the pictures of 
 Eembrandt. On coming home she inquired if the man 
 never pressed his trousers. It was easy to see what was 
 in her mind as he unfolded the wonders of Eembrandt 's 
 genius. A flower in the button hole even may be too con- 
 spicuous. These and many more little distractions might 
 be mentioned; we can sum up the lesson taught by all 
 with one piece of advice : Dress well but inconspicuously, 
 neither exaggerate in attire nor fall into slovenliness. 
 
 5. Suggestive ideas often send the listener off on a 
 tangent. You may use an illustration merely as a means 
 of bringing out a relatively minor point, but it may find 
 fertile soil in some mind, take root, and grow while you 
 are proceeding with the rest of your address. This 
 cannot be helped ; all minds seize upon thoughts and work 
 them out without attention to whatever else is going on. 
 The best preventatives of evil results from this tendency 
 are movement in. the thought of the speech and animation 
 in delivery. The relating of this thought to that and the 
 fitting all into a scheme which the listener sees grow as 
 you proceed, is the best means of keeping his attention 
 with you and your address. Of course the voice is of won- 
 derful assistance, for emphasis here and a pause there 
 
ATTENTION 341 
 
 will capture the straying mind and bring it back to you 
 and your unfolding message. 
 
 Add to all these possible rivals for attention, the effect 
 of any deficiency of rhetoric or composition. Indeed all 
 excellence of expression is measured by the degree to 
 which it insures the easy and attractive transference of 
 thought. If sentences are ungrammatical so as to ob- 
 scure the meaning, then the attention will be lost. The 
 listener must stop attending to the progress of the 
 thought in order to unravel a tangle of meaning. Cor- 
 rectness in grammar and simple attractiveness in style, 
 are both means of keeping the attention on the message 
 rather than on the mechanism of expression. 
 
 8. Conclusion 
 
 It is clear that during speech delivery the speaker can- 
 not very well examine himself to determine how his atten- 
 tion is disposed, for that very act would disturb the 
 proper distribution of attention. But one can recollect 
 after a speech what took place in his mind. Possibly such 
 recollection and self-examination may point the way to 
 improvement by revealing faults which threaten to 
 become habitual. 
 
 For practical purposes we can sum up the precautions 
 which should be taken. 
 
 I. In general perfect your vocabulary, pronunciation, 
 bodily movements and grammatical modes of expression 
 so that they are automatic and spring into proper action 
 as the thought to be expressed comes to mind. Only 
 w^hen some derangement in this whole mechanism takes 
 place during delivery, should it receive conscious atten- 
 tion. 
 
 II. Be thorough in your research and preparation, 
 cultivating habitual attention until the whole is completed. 
 
342 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 III. Make your plan carefully and as simply as pos- 
 sible. Then keep that plan in the center of attention. 
 
 IV. Also pay attention at a lower level (or zone out 
 from the focus) to the audience and adapt the parts of 
 your message to the audience as it changes from time to 
 time in receptiveness. 
 
 A careful observation of these four things will go a 
 great way toward insuring proper attention on your part 
 and on the part of the audience. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exercises in this entire lesson shoukl be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson through twice. Then review in a 
 thorough manner Lesson 4. 
 
 Second Day. — Observe whenever something you are doing grows 
 wearisome. Make careful note of the number of times you 
 start to do somethhig and stop before it is completed. Are 
 you incapable of the hard concentration of the habit type? 
 If 3^ou are tempted to turn aside from something as you 
 grow weary of it, stick to it simply as a test of character. 
 Remember that you must get the habit of concentration if 
 you are ever to get at -the bottom of anvthing and do it 
 well. 
 
 Third Day. — On this or some substituted day, attend a sermon, 
 lecture or other extended address and note when the theme 
 grows uninteresting or when your attention wanders. Can 
 you put your finger on the reason for each lapse ? Was the 
 cause included in those enumerated in this lesson, or was 
 there some other cause? (Of course this very task tends to 
 divide your attention, but if you honestly attend to the 
 speaker and do not reflect on the loss of attention until it 
 actually takes place, the evil will be reduced.) Write out 
 your observations. 
 
 Fourth Day. — At another speech, observe the audience and 
 speaker. Do not attend primarily to his message, but rather 
 make your own observation of the kind of attention he 
 arouses and holds. See how he meets situations. Do .you 
 
ATTEXTIOX 343 
 
 think he attends to his audienee ? Did lie make any mis- 
 takes? AVliat were they? Do they suggest to you any addi- 
 tions to tliip lesson ? 
 
 FifiJi Dai/. — Plan and deliver orally a short speeeh. IIow do 
 you tind your attention to the main line of argument? Do 
 you keep your outline clearly before you? Have you any 
 distracting language disability, any faults of gesture? Have 
 you a tendency to ramble, overamplify. or pursue suggested 
 new ideas ? 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 Tlictsf (jiu'stions are for the student to I'.sc in testinfr 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. J hey 
 are suggestive merely', dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What two aspects of attention are treated in this lesson .' 
 Why is the second important :' 
 
 2. Can you give a detinition of attention ? No formal 
 definition is given in the lesson. 
 
 3. What is meant by subject and object when we discuss 
 attention? Can the object be witliin a man's own mind, or must 
 it be a real, external thing? 
 
 4. What is meant by zones of attention ? Mliat is the focus 
 of attention ? When we say that a thing is below the threshold of 
 attention, what do we mean? Could we just as properly say, 
 beyond the farthest zone? 
 
 5. What are the characteristics of voluntary attention? 
 What are the characteristics of involuntary attention? What 
 are the characteristics of habitual attention ? 
 
 6. Which of these is most desirable during the preparation 
 of speech material ? Why ? 
 
 7. Which is the most desirable during delivery? Why? 
 
 8. Does interest play any part in attention? What inter- 
 ests start the speaker on his task of research and renew his 
 application whenever habitual attention breaks? 
 
 9. What operations should receive no conscious attention 
 during delivery ? How do they manage to go on satisfactorily 
 without attention ? Look at the lesson on action and see if certain 
 actions become automatic. 
 
 10. What kind of attention should the audience receive? 
 What particular things connected with the audience are espe- 
 cially worthy of this sort of attention? Do those things always 
 stay at the- same level of attention — or in the same zone of 
 attention ? 
 
 11. What is the life history of a distraction? Take first an 
 important distraction and then an unimportant one. 
 
 12. How does the interest of the audience affect its attention? 
 
 13. What effect has monotony on the attention paid by the 
 audience? What things in speech delivery are prone to 
 monotony ? 
 
 14. Why should a speaker avoid all peculiarities of manner, 
 speech and dress? Do you remember any speaker who had a 
 shortcoming of this sort which caused disaster? 
 
 15. How can a speaker prevent .'^ome of his own good ideas 
 from starting the audience oif on a little line of meditation, tc 
 the exclusion of the speaker's address? 
 
 344 
 
LESSON 19 
 
 THE PURPOSE OF A SPEECH 
 
 The seed from which every speech springs, is the jmr- 
 pose to be accomplished by it. This seed, taking root in 
 the heart of the speaker, germinates in his search for 
 material, puts forth leaves in his planning, and bears 
 frnit in the delivery. And each of these stages is deter- 
 mined in its character by the nature of the original seed. 
 The purpose starts all the mechanism of speech-making 
 and dominates at every step. The more clearly defined 
 the purpose, the more directly the speaker sets about his 
 several tasks. To change the fig-ure, we may say that 
 the purpose sets the mark and aims the gim. If the 
 speaker follows the guidance of his purpose successfully, 
 he hits the mark. Though we have left our discussion of 
 the purpose of the speech and its ramifying influences 
 until this late lesson, we have assumed from the very 
 })eginning that a purpose exists for every speech. Its 
 existence was implied in our treatment of organization, 
 planning, and dividing the speech, and in our exposition 
 of the treatment of various details. 
 
 1. Nature of Purpose 
 
 Purposes are as many and various as the differing 
 characters of men multiplied by the millions of situations 
 which confront them in kaleidoscopic rotation, and mul- 
 tiplied again by the numberless combinations of minds 
 and temperaments in the audiences. Assume that a man 
 has for one of his purposes, the selling of lawn mowers; 
 
 845 
 
346 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 that purpose and the carrying it to a successful issue 
 will vary with each customer. Furthermore, the means 
 which he will use in a certain case will not be the same 
 as the means he will use to carry out another purpose, 
 such as the winning of a bride to share with him the 
 profits of his numerous sales. Each purpose is individ- 
 ual and each speech brings with it special problems con- 
 nected with the accomplishment of the end in view. 
 
 The old rhetoricians endeavored to classify the ends 
 or purposes of speeches. They tried to establish certain 
 kinds of ends which would embrace all particular cases. 
 Aristotle (B. C. 384-322) divided all speeches into (1) 
 the demonstrative, which had for their end the simple 
 presentation of things for the pleasure or displeasure 
 naturally associated with them; (2) the judicial, which 
 sought to establish justice through the proof of the truth 
 about something which took place in the past; and (3) 
 the deliberative, which undertook to move the hearers to 
 a wise future action. This is a fair classification of the 
 occasions or subjects of a Greek orator's speeches, but it 
 otfers little suggestion concerning differences in method 
 in attaining the various ends. 
 
 Modern writers have turned to psychology for a basis 
 of classifying the general purposes of a speaker. One of 
 the early English arrangements of this sort is that of 
 Campbell (1757) which has been widely copied and poorly 
 imitated. He said, "All the ends of speaking are re- 
 ducible to four ; every speech being intended to enlighten 
 the understanding, to please the imagination, to move 
 the passions, or to influence the will." 
 
 But these classifications overlook the complex nature 
 of a speech which would be of service to accomplish any 
 purpose in practical life. For instance, it is difficult to 
 move the will unless the imagination, feelings, and under- 
 standing have all been set into operation also, and it is 
 hard to say when a simple appeal to the imagination may 
 
PURPOSE OF A SPEECH 347 
 
 not work itself out in action. Indeed a speech contains 
 an almost infinite number of images, coi\cex)ts, and ap- 
 peals of various sorts. Many a speech is a complex of 
 pleasure-giving- pictures, rigorous jjroof, and lively 
 appeal to action. The mixture of all these serves to 
 bring about the purpose of the speaker. AVe might well 
 reduce such elements, to be found in various propositions 
 in all speeches, to certain psychological units, such as 
 images, concepts, judgments, and reasoning processes 
 on the cognitive side, and feelings, emotions, and senti- 
 ments on the affective side, with certain formulas for 
 their application to secure action. But the end or pur- 
 pose of a real speech is not to present just one of these 
 to the exclusion of the others. The purpose may be any 
 practical thing from the announcement of the coming and 
 going of the trains to the securing of a million dollars 
 for charity. Furthermore, the end might be the artistic 
 one of representing a series of images, ideas, and ideals 
 for the emotions they would successively arouse. 
 
 2. Means Toward the End 
 
 To further his particular end, the speaker stirs in the 
 minds of those before him the elements previously men- 
 tioned, in desirable combinations. He must, in each case, 
 determine just what will influence his special audience in 
 a particular way. He knows that a proposition cannot 
 be proved by argument before the audience is in posses- 
 sion of the facts involved. He makes up his mind whether 
 or not his peculiar audience is acquainted with those 
 facts. In one event he presents them vividly, in the other 
 he need hardly refer to them, though in both instances 
 his purpose is the same. An inductive argaiment is neces- 
 sary only when a given audience does not accept the gen- 
 eral law to which the speaker wants to refer. If such 
 a generalization be accepted, it need only be expressed; 
 
348 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 there is no necessity for establishment. People already 
 inclined in a certain impulse direction need only the men- 
 tion of an act in harmony with it to set them in motion ; 
 while others not so favorably disposed at the outset, must 
 be impressed with the desirability of the act proposed. 
 The purpose, then, is always specific and the speaker in 
 each instance selects his elements or ingredients in a 
 manner likely to be most effective with a particular audi- 
 ence taking a particular, initial attitude. It is clear now, 
 no doubt, wdiy we delayed our detailed treatment of the 
 purpose of the speech until after the presentation of 
 images, concepts, arguments, and the springs to action. 
 All must be understood if they are to subserve the pur- 
 pose of the speaker. He must, to use Hamlet's figure, 
 play upon his audience as a nmsician works the stops of 
 his instrument. He calls up images, feelings, impulses — 
 all in the order best calculated to make the accomplish- 
 ment of his purpose easy and natural. 
 
 3. Formulation of the Purpose 
 
 One should always clearly formulate his purpose. He 
 should be sure of his aim. It is even well to write it down 
 so as to be more definite. Thus one might head his 
 plan: — ''To persuade the school board to introduce do- 
 mestic science into the course of study," or "To arouse 
 sentiment in favor of single tax among the farmers of 
 this county," or "To inform the clerks of my department 
 about the workings of a new filing system." These are 
 typical of the thousands of specific purposes which must 
 be accomplished through speech. 
 
 Having fixed on the exact nature of his purpose, the 
 speaker may then proceed to determine just what ele- 
 ments will influence tliose before him in the desired 
 manner. He must make his choice g^iided by two consid- 
 erations: (1) He must C()m])ass his subject as a com- 
 
PURPOSE OF A SPEECH 340 
 
 l>leted composition in itself, yet (2) lie must modify his 
 treatment to meet the peculiarities of those to be im- 
 ])i'essed. The subject makes its demands as an abstract 
 thing, apart from any individual, and the audience makes 
 its demands because of its limitations of ujiderstanding 
 and feeling. Just how does the speaker satisfy both 
 demands, how does he discharge his duty to his message 
 content and his duty to his hearers ? Only by harmoniz- 
 ing the two can he hope to accomplish his purpose. 
 
 It is difficult to find speeches short enough to quote 
 entirely in these lessons, and it is not well to take only 
 an excerpt to illustrate the matter at hand. The fol- 
 lowing address by Wendell Phillips, delivered to the peo- 
 ple of Boston for the purpose of urging them to preserve 
 the Old South Church, may serve. 
 
 A liundred years ago our fathers announced this sublime dec- 
 laration, "God intended all men to be free and equal." Today, 
 with a territory that joins ocean to ocean, with her millions of 
 people, with two warsljehind her, with the sublime achievement 
 of having grappled with the fearful disease that threatened her 
 life, and broken four millions of fetters, the great Republic 
 launches into the second century of her existence. 
 
 With how much pride, with what a thrill, with what tender 
 and loyal reverence, may we not cherish the spot where this 
 marvellous enterprise began — the roof under which its first 
 councils were held, where the air still trembles and burns with 
 Otis and Sam Adams. Except the Holy City, is there any more 
 memorable or sacred place on the face of the earth? * * * 
 Athens has her Acropolis, but the Greek can point to no such 
 results. London has her Palace, and her Tower, and her St. 
 Stephen's Chapel, but the human race owes her no such mem- 
 ories. France has spots marked by the sublimest devotion, but 
 the IMecca of the man who believes and hopes for the human 
 race, is not to Paris; it is to the seaboard cities of the great Re- 
 public. And when the flag was assailed, and the regiments 
 marched through the streets, what walls did they salute as the 
 regimental flags floated by to Gettysburg and Antietam? These! 
 Our bovs carried down to the battlefields the memorv of State 
 Street, of Faneuil Hall, of the Old South Church. 
 
 We had signal prominence in the still earlier days of the 
 Revolution. It was on the men of Boston that Lord North 
 
350 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 visited his revenge. It was oiir port that was to l)e shut and its 
 commerce annihilated. It was Sam Adams and John Hancock 
 who enjoyed the everlasting reward of being the onl}' names 
 excepted from the royal proclamation of forgiveness. Here, Sam 
 Adams, the ablest and ripest statesman God gave to the epoch, 
 forecast those measures which welded the thirteen colonies into 
 one thunderbolt, and launched it at George the Third. Here, 
 Otis magnetized every boy into a desperate rebel. 
 
 The saving of this landmark is the best monument you can 
 erect to the men of the Kevolution. You spend thousands of 
 dollars to put up a statue to some old hero. You want your sons 
 to gaze upon the nearest approach to the features of those "dead 
 but sceptered sovereigns Avho still rule our spirits from their 
 urns." But what is a statue of Cicero compared to standing 
 where your voice echoes from pillar and wall that actually heard 
 his philippics? Scholars have grown old and blind, striving to 
 put their hands on the very spot where bold men spoke or brave 
 men died. Shall w^e tear in pieces the roof that actually trembled 
 to the words that made us a nation ? It is impossible not to 
 believe, if the spirits above us are permitted to know what passes 
 in this terrestrial sphere, that Adams, and "Warren, and Otis are 
 today bending over us asking that the scene of their immortal 
 labors shall not be desecrated, or blotted from the sight of men. 
 
 Consecrate it again to the memory and worship of a grateful 
 people ! Napoleon turned aside his Simplon Road to save a tree 
 Caesar had once mentioned. Won't you turn a street, or spare 
 a quarter of an acre, to remind, boys what sort of men their 
 fathers were? Think twice before you touch these walls. We are 
 the world's trustees. The Old South no more belongs to us 
 than Luther's or Hampden's or Brutus 's name does to Germany, 
 England, or Rome. Each and all are held in trust as torchlight 
 guides and inspiration for any man struggling for justice and 
 ready to die for truth. The worship of great memories, noble 
 deeds, sacred places, is one of the keenest ripeners of such ele- 
 ments. Seize greedily on every chance to save and emphasize 
 them. 
 
 Without going- into the minute details, we can indicate 
 the selection of material in this case. In the first para- 
 graph Phillips makes a general statement whicli arouses 
 a sentiment of national pride. No elaboration or ox])Ia^ 
 nation is necessary to that American audience In llie 
 second paragraph he says that we may well cliciisli the 
 
PURPOSE OF A SPEECH 351 
 
 spot where it all had its beginning. Then he arouses 
 emotions of love and pride by recalling particular men — 
 ( )tis and Adams — and by comparing Old South with other 
 famous places of national pride the w^orld over. The 
 last part of the second paragraph and all of the third re- 
 call occurrences in the Old South which make it dear to the 
 town people. Notice that information is not elaborate 
 and references are by a Avord or two only. If the speech 
 had been made in San Francisco, to collect funds to send 
 
 to Boston, no doubt Phillips would have used vivid 
 images of all these events instead of merely referring 
 to them as familiar things. 
 
 So far there is no argument, all is image-raising and 
 the arousing of sentiments and emotions by means of 
 reference. But in the fourth paragraph, arguments are 
 advanced. It is reasoned that the money spent to pre- 
 serve this landmark will give a better return than the 
 amount to erect a monument. Furthermore, it is con- 
 tended that the permanent nature of the pla-ce w^ill insure 
 against future uncertainty concerning the spot in ques- 
 tion. The paragraph concludes with an emotional refer- 
 ence to Otis, Warren, and Adams. The last paragraph 
 is an almost perfect peroration of the poetic enlarge- 
 ment type. (See Lesson 6, pages 92 to 97.) 
 
 As one of the exercises,. we shall assign to the student 
 tlie preparation of this speech, to be delivered to a culti- 
 vated audience in Richmond, Virginia, the same date the 
 original was delivered — June 4, ]876. The object is the 
 securing of funds to preserve Old South Church. How 
 will the student fit the essentials of the message to the 
 understanding and feelings of this different audience? 
 
 /Sometimes the purpose of a speech is not to stimulate 
 a definite action, but merely to use such images and con- 
 cepts as will arouse a general sentiment of a given sort 
 which will abide and become part of the character of the 
 
352 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 listener. Maii}^ sermons and ethical addresses have this 
 sort of purpose. The following speech by Lincoln is a 
 fair example. 
 
 Address of August 31, 1864, to the 148th Ohio 
 
 Soldiers of the 148th Ohio: 
 
 I am most happy to meet you on this occasion. I understand 
 that it has heen your honorable privilege to stand, for a brief 
 period, in the defence of your country, and that now you are on 
 the way to your homes. I congratulate j^ou and those who are 
 waiting to bid you welcome home from the war; and permit me 
 in the name of the people to thank you for the part you have 
 taken in this struggle for the life of the nation. You are sol- 
 diers of the republic, everywhere honored and respected. When- 
 ever I appear before a body of soldiers, I feel tempted to talk 
 to them of the nature of the struggle in which we are engaged. 
 I look upon it as an attempt, on the one hand, to overwhelm 
 and destroy the national existence ; while on our part, we are 
 striving to maintain the government and institutions of our 
 fathers, to enjoy them ourselves, and transmit them to our chil- 
 dren and to our children 's children forever. 
 
 To do this, the constitutional administration of our govern- 
 ment must be sustained, and I beg of you not to allow your minds 
 or your hearts to be diverted from the support of all necessary 
 measures for that purpose, by any miserable picayune arguments 
 addressed to your pockets, or inflammatory appeals made to your 
 passions and your prejudices. 
 
 It is vain and foolish to arraign this man or that for the part 
 he has taken or has not taken, and to hold the government 
 responsible for his acts. In no administration can there be 
 perfect equality of action and uniform satisfaction rendered 
 by all. 
 
 But this government must be preserved in spite of the acts 
 of any man or set of men. It is worthy of your every effort. 
 Nowhere in the world is presented a government of so much 
 liberty and equality. To the humblest aiul poorest among us 
 are held out the highest privih'ges and positions. The present 
 moment finds me at the White House, yet there is as good a 
 chance for your children as there was for m.y father '.s. 
 
 Again I admonish you not to be turned from your stern pur- 
 pose of defending our beloved country and its free institutions 
 by any arguments urged by ambitious and designing men, but 
 to stand fast for the Union and tlie old flag. 
 
 Soldiers, I bid you God-speed 1o your homes. 
 
PURPOSE OF A SPEECH • 353 
 
 Here the idea that the life of the nation is greater tlian 
 that of the individual is developed so as to arouse a 
 strong- sentiment of loyalty to that idea. Considering 
 the time of the address and the men in the audience, it 
 is difficult to conceive of a better selection of material to 
 foster a strong and constant sentiment of loyalty and 
 service than this. The Gettysburg Speech is like this 
 one in general character. It simply holds up the ideal 
 of dedication and consecration to the great work of 
 perpetuating the union. 
 
 In deliberative bodies, in law courts, and in public 
 debate, it is sometimes -the purpose of the speaker merely 
 to make a vague impression of a certain sort in order 
 to get an opponent to go definitely on record with views 
 which may be attacked after they are fully expressed. 
 Note the following address by Patrick Henry, delivered 
 before the Constitutional Convention of Virginia, June 
 4, 1788. The Constitution had been drawn up in Phila- 
 delphia and was being presented to the various states 
 for adoption. The preamble and the first two sections 
 of the first article were up for adoption. Henry did 
 not want them accepted, yet he preferred to attack after 
 those favoring the Constitution had exposed the strength 
 of their arguments. Furthermore, he wanted to register 
 a general protest against the power used by the Phila- 
 delphia delegates and to create a feeling of distrust and 
 fear of impending disaster. 
 
 Mr. Chainium : 
 
 The i>nblic mind, as well a.s my own, is extremely mieasy at 
 the proposed ehaiige in the government. Give me leave to form 
 one of tlie nnmlx^r of those who wish to be thoroughly acquainted 
 with this perilous and imeasy situaticm, and why we are brought 
 hitlier to decide on this great naticmal question. I consider my- 
 self as tlie servant of the people of this commonwealth, as a 
 sentinel over their rights, liberty, and happiness. I represent 
 their feelings when I say that thev are exceedingly uneasy, being 
 brought from that state of full security which they enjoy, to the 
 
354 ^ EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 present delusive appearance of things. Before the meeting of 
 the late federal convention at Philadelphia, a general peace and 
 a universal tranquility prevailed in this country, and the minds 
 of our citizens were at perfect repose ; but since that period, 
 they are exceedingly uneasy and disquieted. 
 
 When I wished for an appointment to this convention, my 
 mind was extremely agitated over the situation of public affairs. 
 I conceive the republic to be in extreme danger. If our situa- 
 tion be thus uneasy, whence has arisen this fearful jeopardy? 
 It arises from this fatal s.ystem ; it arises from a proposal to 
 change our government — a proposal that goes to an utter anni- 
 hilation of the most solemn engagements of the states — a pro- 
 posal to establish nine states into a confederacy to the eventful 
 exclusion of four states. It goes to the annihilation of those 
 solemn treaties which we have formed with foreign nations. The 
 present circumstances of France, the good offices rendered us 
 by that kingdom, require our most faithful and most punctual 
 adherence to our treaty with her. We are in alliance with the 
 Spaniards, the Dutch, the Prussians; these treaties bind us as 
 thirteen states, confederated together. Yet here is a proposal 
 to sever that confederacy. Is it possible that we shall abandon 
 all oiir treaties and national engagements? And for what? 
 * * * ^-^s our civil policy or public .justice endangered or 
 sapped? Was the real existence of the country threatened, or 
 was this preceded by a mournful procession of events? 
 
 This proposal of altering our federal government is of a most 
 alarming nature ; make the best of this new government— say 
 it is composed of anything but inspiration — you ought to be 
 extremely cautious, watchful, jealous of your liberty ; for instead 
 of securing your rights, you may lose them forever. If this new 
 government will not come up to the expectations of the people, 
 and they should be disappointed, their liberty will be lost and 
 tyranny must and will arise. I repeat it again, and I beg gentle- 
 men to consider, that a wrong step made now, will plunge us 
 into misery, and our republic will be lost. 
 
 It will be necessary for this convention to have a faithful his- 
 torical detail of the facts that i)receded the session of the fed- 
 eral convention, and the reasons that actuated its members in 
 proposing an entire alteration of government — and to demon- 
 strate the dangers that awaited us. If they were of such awful 
 magnitude as to warrant a pi-oposal so extremely perilous as this, 
 I must assert that lliis coinciitioii lias an absolute right to a thor- 
 ough knowledge of cvci'.n- circiiiustaiice relative to this great evcni. 
 And here I would make this iiupiiry of those worthy cliaracters 
 who composed a part of the late federal convention. I am snw 
 that they were impressed \\ifh the necessity of forming a great 
 
PrRPOSE OF A SPEECH 355 
 
 consolidated government, instead of a confederacy. That this 
 is a consolidated government is demonstrably clear; and the 
 danger of such a government i.s, to my mind, very striking. I 
 have the highest veneration for those gentlemen ; but, sir, give 
 l)e leave to demand what right had they to say "We, the People," 
 instead of We, the States? jMy political curiosity, exclusive of 
 my anxious solicitude for the public welfare, leads me to ask, 
 wlio authorized them to speak the language of, "AVe, the Peo- 
 ple," instead of We, the States? States are the characteristics 
 and the soul of a confederation. If the states be not the agents 
 of this compact, it must be one great, consolidated national gov- 
 ernment of the people of all the states. I have the highest respect 
 for those gentlemen who formed the convention ; and were some 
 of them not here, I would express some testimonial of esteem 
 for them. America had, on a former occasion, put the utmost 
 confidence in them ; a confidence which was well placed ; and I 
 am sure, sir, I would give up anything to them ; I woulcl cheer- 
 fully confide in them as my representatives. But, sir, on this 
 great occasion, I would demand the cause of their conduct. 
 Even from that illustrious man, who saved us by his valor, I 
 would have a reason for his conduct ; indeed that liberty Avhich 
 he gave us by his valor, tells me to ask this reason ; and I am 
 sure, were he here, he would give us that reason ; but there are 
 other gentlemen here who can give us that information. The 
 people gave them no power to use their name. That they 
 exceeded their power is perfectly clear. 
 
 It is not mere curiosity that actuates me ; I want to know the 
 real, actual, existing danger which should lead us to take those 
 steps so disastrous, in my conception. Disorders have arisen in 
 other parts of America, but here, sir, no dangers, no insurrec- 
 tions nor tumults have happened ; everything has been tranquil. 
 But notwithstanding this, we are wandering on the great ocean 
 of human affairs. I see no landmark to guide us. We are run- 
 ning we know not whither. Difference in opinion has gone to a 
 degree of inflammatory resentment, in different parts of the 
 country, which has been occasioned by this perilous innovation. 
 The federal convention ought to have amended the old system ; 
 for this purpose, they were solely delegated : the object of their 
 mission extended to no other consideration. You must therefore 
 forgive the solicitation of one unworthy member, to know what 
 danger could have arisen under the present confederation, and 
 what are the causes of this proposal to change our government. 
 
 Make a careful analysis of this speech as a wiiole and 
 by para,!OTaphs Avith special reference to the purpose to 
 be accomplished by each part. 
 
356 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 4. Method of Procedure 
 
 Having determined tlie purpose of the speech, the 
 speaker should first arrange the material in a manner 
 that will lead logically and inevitably to the desired end. 
 The best example of this logical arrangement, which is 
 impersonal and sure in its forward march, is the mathe- 
 matical demonstration. In speech making, the academic 
 debate comes nearest. In practical life, the case before 
 a judge of a higher court is the best example. In most 
 speeches, the strictly logical selection must be discarded 
 later and modified to suit a real audience, w^hich is not 
 entirely logical. 
 
 Having made this selection and arrangement of mate- 
 rial, then determine, from the standpoint of understand- 
 ing, the acceptability to the particular audience. Which 
 of the various ideas are familiar to them? Such can be 
 mentioned and put into the proper places, but need no 
 thorough treatment. Familiar images can be referred 
 to by name merely or indicated by striking epithet (see 
 Lesson 10 and particularly page 181). The same is true 
 of concepts and the conclusions of arguments. Where 
 the images, concepts, and arguments are new to the 
 audience, they must be planned for full treatment. (See 
 Lessons 9 to 15.) 
 
 We have intimated that each of the intellectual ele- 
 ments carries with it possibilities of feeling or emotion. 
 But an image which will arouse one feeling in one person 
 will arouse quite a different one in another. The heart- 
 rending situation in a melodrama which has the shop 
 girl worked up to a state of tearful anxiety and sympathy, 
 leaves the young woman just out of college cold and 
 critical of its good taste. A surgeon calmly lays open 
 the abdomen of his appendix patient, while a relative, 
 foolishly standing near, faints. To speak of profit before 
 a board of directors carries with it no feeling of injustice 
 
PURPOSE OF A SPEECH 357 
 
 (fi- outrage, but the same notion expressed to a socialist 
 ;( rouses a whole mass of resentment against the exploita- 
 tion of labor and social inequality. ^^We need not pass 
 on the question which is right in these various cases; we 
 merely know that there are differences in feeling pos- 
 sibilities because of class, training, and custom, and also 
 sex and age. AVell, the speaker seeking to arouse certain 
 feelings in consonance with his purpose must look at his 
 means and determine how it will affect his particular 
 audience. Of course he must have some notion of the 
 nature of those before him. 
 
 Just as their intellectual shortcomings dictate full 
 treatment of some things, building from the bottom up, 
 so also their peculiar prejudices and level of emotional 
 refinement will necessitate tactful selection and treatment 
 of others. Look over your material and see what will 
 be readily accepted from the standpoint of favor or 
 emotion. Fix on the best mode of presenting it so as to 
 make the most of that predisposition. Also designate 
 those parts which will run counter to the feelings of the 
 audience. Some will have to be discarded. If that is 
 possible without damaging your case, drop the unpalat- 
 able matter. If it must be preserved, devise the most 
 tactful way of making it tolerable. Many details will 
 often have to be sacrificed or modified. Be cheerful in 
 doing this ; you will never succeed by forcing things down 
 unwilling throats. Eemember that the accomplishment 
 of your general purpose is more important than any 
 detail. 
 
 A good plan is to enumerate the salient features or 
 steps in your speech in one column, then in the other, 
 mark intellectual shortcomings or advantages held by 
 the audience, and in the third, emotional response prob- 
 abilities. This will be your battle plan of sacrifices and 
 modifications. 
 
358 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Naturally, when on the floor you may sense situations 
 quite different from what you anticipated and you may 
 have to make sudden and unexpected modifications in 
 your treatment. The rule to follow is this :;- Keep the 
 purpose unchanged before you; readily sacrifice minor 
 details and make concessions to temporary feelings; 
 when necessary slur over fairly essential parts; finally, 
 if no headway is possible, it is better to stop trying than 
 to antagonize the audience permanently. Sometimes it is 
 wiser to let your purpose Avait for a more favorable 
 occasion than to drive against a hopelessly hostile 
 audience. Yet it is wonderful how much can be accom- 
 plished bj^ a speaker who makes his concessions wisely, 
 who respects the feelings of those before him and keeps 
 his own temper. 
 
 There is no rule to guide the speaker in this matter of 
 adjustment to temperament, and men cannot be classified 
 according to feelings. Aristotle sought to aid the orator 
 by giving the characteristics of young men so that one 
 addressing a group of them might know what to expect. 
 For instance, he said that young men are violent in 
 desires, quick to action, easily moved, easily deceived, 
 generous, lovers of honor rather than riches, merciful, 
 valiant, etc., while old men are slow to action, slow of 
 decision, without violent desires, lovers of gain rather 
 than abstract honor, timid, etc., and middle-aged men are 
 somewhat between the two in character. He also 
 analyzes the characters of the noble, the rich and the 
 poor. While to be sure, there is much truth in what is 
 said, there is little practical help with a real audience. 
 Each audience is composite in its makeup and the special 
 interests of every group are so various that the only 
 •help a speaker can have is an intimate knowledge of 
 those particular interests, prejudices, and inclinations. 
 We advise the student to get from the library Aristotle's 
 Rhetoric, which is well translated and easily had. Eead 
 
PURPOSE OF A SPEECH 361 
 
 iar with the Articles of ('oiifcdei-itioii, but the Constitution 
 is new. Realize that you are conlending against an attitude 
 created by the Henry speech. 
 
 Fifth Dfl^.— Deliver orally the speech prepared on the fourth 
 day. 
 
 Some \Vi. 
 speaker slioukl aiwci^ 
 
 his purpose clearly to the auuit^x^.. tviLii tins we must 
 differ. It is certainly necessary to have your purpose 
 clearly defined in your own mind^ but it is often very 
 unwise to give it voice either before or after it is accom- 
 plished. We can easily discern the purpose of Patrick 
 Henry in his address (given in this lesson) to the Vir- 
 ginia Convention, especialh^ when we have access to the 
 addresses of other men in reply and Henry's later 
 assaults on their arguments. But Henry would have 
 been very foolish to reveal that purpose at the outset. 
 When a theatrical manager comes before the curtain to 
 address the audience while a fire is being extinguished 
 behind the asbestos curtain, he very wisely holds back 
 his real purpose — namely, the avoidance of a panic. To 
 express that purpose would be the very best way to 
 defeat it. So also when we are trying to win over an 
 audience to our point of view, which seems directly 
 counter to their life habits, thoughts, and feelings, we 
 never reveal our purpose in the speech. 
 
 Furthermore, a wise man does not ''crow" or "rub 
 it in" after he has been successful. His reward is his 
 purpose accomplished. In this connection read once 
 more page 61 of Lesson 4. 
 
358 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Naturally, when on the floor you may sense situations 
 quite different from what you anticipated and you may 
 have to make sudden and unexpected modifications in 
 your treatment. The rule to follow is this : Keep the 
 purpose unchanged before you; readily sacrifice minor 
 details and make concessions to temporary feelings; 
 when necessary slur over fairly essential parts; finally, 
 if no headway is possible, it is better to stop trying than 
 to antagonize the audience permanently. Sometimes it is 
 wiser to let your purpose wait for a more favora^ 
 occasion than to drive against a hopelessly ^ 
 audience. Yet it is w^onderful how much "" 
 plished by a speaker who make^' ' '^ 
 
 The written exercises in this entire lesson should be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in your notebook. 
 
 Fir at Dat/.— Read the lesson over three times and make an 
 abstract of it. 
 
 Second Day.— Write the Phillips speech, using the left-hand half 
 of a piece of paper. Fold the paper down the center and 
 write only on the left side of the crease. On the right side, 
 indicate modifications which would be made if the speaker 
 were talking to people in San Francisco who had never been 
 in Boston. His purpose is to raise funds for an historical 
 society to purchase Old South in order to preserve it. 
 
 Third Day.— Select some topic in which you are interested, some 
 audience with which you are familiar, and designate a pur- 
 pose to be accomplished. Then outline your material and 
 modifications as indicated on page 357 of this lesson. Deliver 
 the speech with only the outline of finally ap])roved material 
 memorized. 
 
 Fourth Day.— Plan a speech in reply to Patrick Henry.- It is a 
 speech to induce the Virginia Convention to adopt the Con- 
 stitution. Read the Constitution and any school history 
 account of the condition of the country when the Articles of 
 Confederation were in force. Work this speech up thor- 
 oughly. Remember that the delegates are thoroughly famil- 
 
PURPO^^E of a speech 361 
 
 ifir witli llu' A ft ides of Coiifi-dci-il ion, but the Constitntiou 
 is new. Kcnlizc llinl you fuv coiilcuding a^ninst an attituck- 
 created by tbe Ileniy speeeb. 
 
 Fifth Z)aiy.— Deliver orally tbe speed) prepared on the fourtb 
 day. ■ 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testint,- 
 his knowledge of tlie principles in tliis lesson. They 
 are suggesiiie merely, dealinp- largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to he placed in the 
 notebook for futuie reference. 
 
 L What is meant by the purpose of the speech? Is it a 
 ^(nieral thing or a specific thing f Can purposes be easily 
 ( lassified? 
 
 2. When does the purpose first arise? How h)ng shoukl it 
 persist ? 
 
 3. What was Aristotle's classification of the ends of speak- 
 ing? What is the value of this classification ? 
 
 4. Can you give Campbell 's classification ? What do you 
 think of it? Assuming it correct in general theory, could you 
 improve on the classification he gives? 
 
 5. What do we mean l)y the elements used in constructing a 
 si)eech ? 
 
 6. What part does an element play in carrying out the pur- 
 pose of the speaker? 
 
 7. Should the speaker have his purpose clearly formulated? 
 Why ? 
 
 8. In preparing his message for the purpose of accomplish- 
 ing his encl, what two general considerations move the speaker? 
 
 9. What do you think of the Phillips selection ? IIow do you 
 like the style? How does it compare with that of Patrick 
 Henry ? Which reflects the greater culture ? 
 
 10. Can you make a rough classification of purposes? Try it. 
 
 11. AVhat are the steps in method procedure in preparing a 
 speech, with the purpose as the guide? 
 
 12. Can men be clas.sified according to emotional response? 
 according to intellectual attainments? 
 
 13. Is an audience homogeneous, or are the individual charac- 
 liM'islics widely divergent? What effect has this on the accom- 
 ])lisliin('iit of the speaker's purpose? 
 
 14. Should the speaker always stale his jjiirpose clearly to the 
 audience? Why? 
 
 302 
 
LESSON 20 
 
 THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE 
 
 With the exception of the rules for posture and breath- 
 iii.i;- in Lesson 1, we have not discussed elocution, a subject 
 ^^•]lich takes account of the expressive powers of the voice 
 ill speech. We have paid more attention to psychological 
 aspects such as the organization of ideas, the gathering 
 of material, the clear grasp of details, and methods of 
 impressing all these things upon the audience. Now we 
 wish to add that the mere selection of proper words in 
 c;'rtain groupings will not bring the greatest success with 
 an audience. The voice must be used effectively to get 
 tli(^ bpst results. It is possible to spoil the most beautiful 
 composition by poor vocal expression, harsh tones, and 
 monotony. One must lend to the wisdom of the mind the 
 ])('auty of the voice. In this lesson we shall consider what 
 tlie voice adds to the message. The lesson may be 
 regarded as a continuation of number seven; and it would 
 ])(' well for the student to review the advice given there 
 before taking up this new matter. 
 
 Excellence of posture and breathing will insure a good 
 habitual tone of voice. In this lesson we shall analyze 
 that voice as a succession of constantly varying sounds, 
 and we shall explain the expressional effects of those 
 variations. We assume, at the outset, that the student 
 has developed a good normal tone — that he stands cor- 
 rectly, has complete control of his breathing, and speaks 
 with throat well relaxed. He has no constriction any- 
 
 303 
 
3r,4 EFFECTIVE IMIBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 where and all tlie operations of sonnd production are easy, 
 natural, full, and strong. 
 
 The sounds which follow one another in speech are 
 produced nnicli like the notes of a wind instrument of tli(^ 
 horn group. They have certain distinguishable charac- 
 teristics. In the first place each has a recognizable 
 qualitij, and they come forth at a more or less rapid raie ; 
 while each has a definite pitch and force. As we listen to 
 the sounds of a man speaking, w^e notice changes in qual- 
 ity, rate, pitch, and force. We shall be interested in these 
 possible variations in the tone of the voice and their value 
 in expression. 
 
 ]. (j)rALITY 
 
 1. Nature. — If one were to hear a man talking, in the 
 distance, though the exact words might not be audible, 
 the humdu vuice equality would be unmistakable. The 
 voice could not be mistaken for the cry of an animal. 
 Again, if you were to hear three pc^ople with whom you 
 are familiar talking in the next room, and each should 
 repeat the same words after the other, you could say, 
 ^'Now Smith is speaking; now it is Jones; and now it is 
 Brown." There is an individual equality which distin- 
 guishes each man's voice from that of every other man. 
 
 2. Physical Basis. — The raw material of every vocal 
 sound which has quality, is an indefinite murmur made 
 by the vocal cords. These cords are like little cushions 
 or lips pressed together in the larynx (voice box or 
 Adam's apple). As the air comes up the windpipe from 
 the lungs, they rapidly press togc^ther and fly apart thus 
 letting the air ])ass ui)ward in a series of puffs. At th(^ 
 cords, the sound audible from these puffs is an indefinite 
 murmur or buzzing. It is much like the buzz made by 
 the lips of the player at the mouthpiece of a simple horn. 
 But just as the tube and flaring ])ell of the horn modify, 
 I'einforce, and give (|naliiy to the mlsern1)le buzz at its 
 
THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE 
 
 365 
 
 inontlipiece, so also the cavities of the throat, iiioutli, and 
 nose, give quality or ton(^ to the vocal mnrmur. 
 
 ScHEMK OF Vocal Organs 
 Agents of Resonation: 
 
 A — Hard and Fixed — Bones of SkuH (B. S-K.), Bones of Nasal Cavity 
 (N. C), Superior MaxiUary or Hard Palate (S. M.), Teeth (D), and 
 Inferior Maxillary or Lower Jaw (I. M.). 
 
 n — Soft and Flexible — Ventricle above Vocal Cords (V.), Upper Cham- 
 ber of Larvnx (L.), Epiglottis (B.), Pharynx (Ph.), Soft Palate (P.), 
 Cheeks (Ch.), Tongue (T.), and Lips (L.). 
 
 Also note C. — vocal cords, G. = gullet, Tr. = trachea or windpipe. 
 Cavities are left wliite. 
 
 The passages through which the sound passes as it is 
 modified in quality, have, in some places, hard and fixed 
 walls, while in other places, the walls are soft and flex- 
 
366 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ible. The size and shape of these cavities and the texture 
 of their walls, at the time the sound is being produced, 
 determine the quality. Since the soft and flexible parts 
 can change in size, shape, and texture, it is evident that 
 a man's voice may have different qualities at differant 
 times. The human voice therefore has variable quality 
 while that of the simple horn is fixed. On the other hand, 
 the contributions of the hard and fixed parts, tend to pr(^- 
 serve a fixed and individual element. We are particu- 
 larly interested in the possibilities of quality change and 
 what such changes express. This brings us to the mental 
 factors involved. 
 
 3. Psychological Basis of Qualify Changes. — When 
 one experiences an emotion, an integral part of that emo- 
 tion is the physical adjustment. Thus in anger, the heart 
 beats faster, the breathing is quick and the muscles grow 
 tense. In joy, there is relaxation, a strong, steady heart 
 beat and depth of breathing. The whole body is affected, 
 being dominated by the emotion in the mind. But of all 
 the parts of the body to respond, one of the most sensi- 
 tive is the resonation system near and above the vocal 
 cords. The slightest emotion instantly alters the size, 
 shape, and texture of the resonating cavities by action 
 on the soft resonators. In anger there is constriction and 
 tenseness of texture. The tone produced is flat and 
 throaty. It is known as the guttural. AVhen one is 
 inspired by the magnificent and good, there is openness, 
 relaxation, and expansion, and we hear the full, round 
 orotund. In fear we get only a toneless 'whisper. In 
 great joy, there is resiliency and power as reflected in the 
 brilliant quality — a bugle-like tone. 
 
 These are merely types and do not exhaust the list. 
 There are numberless qualities just as there are number- 
 less shades of emotion. Yet no emotion is so slight as 
 not to show in the voice. I^ven a minor disapy)ointm<'nt 
 gives tlic voice a ''hollow ring." 
 
THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE 
 
 367 
 
 4. AppUcation hij fJie Speaker. — It is agreed lliat in 
 speech we wish to convey our thoughts and feelings in the 
 most compk^te and vivid manner possibhi. Every emo- 
 tion experienced shouhl show in the voice. Furthermore, 
 our emotional responses to ideas throw much light on the 
 nature of those ideas. If the ideas are clear and strong, 
 tlu^ir emotional accompaniment will be clear, and expres- 
 sion which gives the whole is far more than a lifeless 
 outline. Let us illustrate by means of a passage from 
 Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address. First read it to 
 a friend in a perfunctory, business-like way, disregarding 
 the notes in the margin and not taking the trouble to 
 make all the images arise vividlv in vour mind. 
 
 Neither party expected for the war the magni- 
 tude or the duration which it has already at- 
 tained. Neither anticipated that the cause of 
 the conflict might cease with, or even before, the 
 conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an 
 easier triumph and a result less fundamental 
 and a.stounding. Both read the same Bible, and 
 pray to the same God ; and each invokes his aid 
 against the other. It may seem strange that any 
 men should dare to ask a just God's assistance 
 in wringing their bread from the sweat of other 
 men'.s faces; but let us judge not, that we be 
 not judged. The prayers of both could not be 
 answered — those of neither have been fully 
 answered. 
 
 The Almighty has his own purposes. "Woe 
 unto the world because of otfenses ! for it must 
 needs be that offenses come ; but woe unto that 
 man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall 
 suppose that American slavery is one of those 
 otT'enses which, in the providence of God. must 
 needs come, but which, having continued through 
 liis appointed time, he now wills to remove, and 
 that he gives to both North and South this ter- 
 rible war, as the woe due to those by whom the 
 offense came, shall we di.scern therein any de- 
 parture from those divine attributes which the 
 believers in a living God always ascribe to him? 
 Fondly do we hope — f(M^vently do we pray — tliat 
 
 Xormal 
 fccliiiff. 
 
 Irony and 
 
 slio-lit 
 
 bittfrnfss. 
 
 Solemnity. 
 
 Confidonpo. 
 
368 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 this miglity scourge of war may speedily pass 
 away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until Angry resolve 
 all tile wealth piled by the bondman's two hun- 
 dred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be 
 sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with 
 the lash sImII be paid by another drawn with 
 the sword. — as it was said two thousand years Sudden change 
 ago, so still it must be said. "The judgments of to 
 the Lord are true and righteous altogether." vesiffnation. 
 
 With malice toward none ; with charity for 
 all ; with firmness in the right, as God gives us Kindliness, 
 to see the right, let us strive on to finish t-he work 
 we are in ; to bind up the nation 's wounds ; to 
 care for him who shall have borne the battle, ^it.v- 
 and for his widow, and his orphan — to do all 
 which may achieve and cherish a just and last- 
 ing peace among ourselves, and with all nations. Quiet peace. 
 
 Xow read it again as well as you can, noting- the emo- 
 tion cnes on the side. Get every idea vividly in mind. 
 Call up the pictures, as of the lash falling on the slave, 
 and feel the proper indignation, ^lake the thoughts live 
 and move and have being in your mind, and the emotions 
 will come and the vocal quality will take care of itself. 
 Ask 5'our friend Avhicli was the more effective rendition. 
 
 If the speaker is unembarrassed and at home before 
 his audience, the s;^Tupathetic and expressive changes in 
 quality will take place in direct proportion to the com- 
 pleteness with which what he says is real to him. He 
 must keep the attention on the thought and the concrete 
 situations which gave rise to it. Situations must be vivid 
 to the mind's eye and the Avliole nature must be allowed 
 to respond in an unrestrained manner to them. If that 
 be done, the message will go forth living, throldiing, 
 effective. 
 
 Suppose one says to a baby, " Til bring yon a beautiful 
 ball to play with," using a flat, uiieiithusinstic (|uality so 
 that the words will mak(» their own, unaided im])ression. 
 There Avill he litth* response. But if one has a com])l(^te 
 anticipation of the many-colored ball and tlu^ frolics with 
 
THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE 369 
 
 it, and then lets the voice show the enthusiti>ni aroused 
 by the pictures, the baby will respond Avith glee, for the 
 meaning conveyed to him is richer and fuller. It is the 
 same way with adults, though the abstract word symbols 
 have more weight with them than with a child. At no 
 time does the enriching value of vocal quality disappear. 
 The voice quality reveals the full subject and also the 
 soul of the speaker. It is for this reason that the speaker 
 must make all his thoughts live again as he gives them 
 voice. It is only with attention on such thoughts that he 
 will have the emotional experiences which will be revealed 
 in quality changes. 
 
 Affectations and exaggerations of qualify' are worse 
 than a lack of sympathy. A tone of manufactured pathos 
 is disgusting and pretended indignation ridiculous. 
 Avoid such sentimentality and be natural. All we want 
 is the proper human emotion which is really felt when the 
 speaker is living in his message and expressing it with- 
 out restraint. 
 
 So also the affecting of a superior "speaking voice" or 
 artificial tone of supposed elegance and impressiveness, 
 is to be avoided. It is like the "company voice" which 
 any bright child recognizes when his mother is foolish 
 enough to "turn it on." The speaker must be a real, 
 genuine, honest, unaffected man, delivering his message 
 in a straightforward manner. His voice shows no con- 
 scious exaggeration on the one hand, no restraint on the 
 other. 
 
 2. Rate 
 
 1. Xafure and Pln/sical Basis. — Rate is simply the 
 speed with which one sound succeeds another in speech. 
 Physically it is regulated by the rapidity of movement of 
 the organs of speech. Sometimes one speaks more rap- 
 idly than his average, or normal rate, and sometimes 
 more slowlv. 
 
370 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 2. Psycliological Basis. — These changes in rate have a 
 mental origin. One cannot express ideas more quickly 
 than his mind i^roduces them. Generally speaking, rate 
 is governed by the rapidity of the speaker's mental oper- 
 ations. In rapid thinking, the rate is fast ; in slow think- 
 ing, the rate is retarded. But besides this involuntaiy 
 control on rate, the speaker often voluntarily regulates 
 his rate out of consideration for his audience. If he is 
 dealing with easy and familiar matter which they can 
 easily and quickly take in, he permits his rate to become 
 rapid, but wdien he is attacking a problem which is either 
 new to them or difficult, he purposely goes slowly. It is 
 here that inexperienced speakers make mistakes; they 
 exercise no voluntary control over their rate, but rattle 
 on or slow up just as they are in easy mental trim them- 
 selves, or are floundering in difficulties. 
 
 3. Application. — Obviously the application will deal 
 mostly with voluntary regulation of rate. The speaker 
 must judge his audience beforehand or sense it whih' 
 speaking, and he should accommodate his rate to their 
 thinking. On familiar and easy passages, he must not 
 be slow for that would be boring; but on difficult passages 
 he must refrain from setting a pace beyond the mental 
 speed of his hearers. Of course, rules cannot be made 
 which will cover all situations; the speaker must judge 
 from signs before him whether he is going at the best 
 pace or too rapidly or too slowly. But the following- 
 three rules may safely be offered : 
 
 (a) Always begin slowly. The audience has not set- 
 th'd down, the place is not as quiet as it will be later, 
 and the speaker has not accommodated his voice to the 
 room. Besides these physical <lraw})acks, there is the 
 mental obstacle of scattered attcidioii; tlie listeners have 
 not settled down to concentrate on the speech. For all 
 these reasons it is best to retard the i-ate at the beginning. 
 
 Example. Kead the following op(niing of "Webster's 
 
THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE Ml 
 
 Tu'ply to Hayiio, to a friend. First read it at normal rate 
 or more rapidh^; tlien read it slowly. Question liini con- 
 cerning the effects. 
 
 Mr. President, when the mariner has been tossed for many 
 days, in thick weather, and on an unknown sea, he naturally 
 avails himself of the tirst pause in the storm, the earliest glance 
 of the sun, to take his latitude and ascertain how far the ele- 
 ments have driven him from his true course. Let us imitate this 
 prudence, and, before we float further on the waves of this debate, 
 refer to the point from which we departed, that we may at least 
 be able to conjecture where we now are. I ask for a reading 
 of the resolution. 
 
 (The resolution on the sale of public lands was read.) 
 We have thus heard what the resolution is, which is actually 
 before us for consideration ; and it will readily occur to everyone 
 that it is almost the only subject about which something has not 
 been said in the speech, running through two days, by which the 
 Senate has been entertained by the gentleman from South Caro- 
 lina. Eveiy topic in the wide range of our public affairs, whether 
 past or present — everything, general or local, whether belonging 
 to national politics or party politics, seems to have attracted 
 more or less of the honorable member's attention, save only the 
 resolution before the Senate. He has spoken about everything 
 except the public lands. They have escaped his notice. To 
 that subject, in all his excursions, he has not paid even the cold 
 respect of a passing glance. 
 
 (b) Retard the rate tvhen many details or clear images 
 must he imparted. This is common in descriptive pas- 
 sages. 
 
 Exam pie. Read the folloAving passage first at normal 
 or rapid rate and then at slow rate and note the gain in 
 vividness. 
 
 The palaces and domes of Carthage were burning with the 
 splendors of noon, and the blue waves of her harbor were rolling 
 and gleaming in the gorgeous sunlight. An attentive ear could 
 catch a low munnur. sounding from the center of the city, which 
 seemed like the moaning of the wind before a tempest. And well 
 it might. The whole people of Carthage, .startled, astounded by 
 the report that Regulus had returned, were pouring, a mighty 
 tide, into the great square before the Senate House. There were 
 mothers in that throng whose captive sons were groaning in 
 
372 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Roman fetters, maidens whose lovers were dying in the distant 
 dnngeons of Rome, gray haired men and matrons, whom Roman 
 steel had made childless ; and with wild voices, cursing and 
 groaning, the vast throng gave vent to the rage, the hate, the 
 anguish of long years. 
 
 (c) When the matter is unfamilmr and difficult, requir- 
 ing much parallel thought, make the delivery slow. For 
 good examples, read again the judge's charge to a jury on 
 page 220 of Lesson 12, and the selections on pages 55, 
 56, and 57 of Lesson 4. 
 
 Most speakers have the fault of using too rapid a rate. 
 To overcome such a fault, attend well to all that you 
 deliver; treat nothing in a perfunctory manner. Then, 
 when you find yourself hurrying along, consciously put 
 a restraint on the speed. 
 
 Nervous people and those of eager temperament are 
 most prone to the fault of excessive speed in delivery. 
 Take stock of yourself and note the way your tempera- 
 ment affects your delivery. Cultivate a smooth, mod- 
 el ate rate. 
 
 4. Pauses. — In connection with rate, we may well 
 consider pauses. They are important in expression. We 
 may disting-uish two kinds of pauses, the logical and the 
 dramatic. Logical pauses are tlie frequent short stops 
 which mark off Avords in logical thought groups.. Note 
 the marking of the following passage into logical thought 
 groups. 
 
 We all, / with e(|ual sincerity, / profess to he anxious / for the- 
 estahlishment of a repuhlican government / on a safe and solid 
 basis. / It is the object of the wishes of every honest man in the 
 United States, / and / 1 presume I shall not be disbelieved / when 
 I declare that it is an object, / of all others, / the nearest and 
 most dear to my OAvn heart. / The means of accomplisliing this 
 great purpose / become the most important study / which can 
 interest mankind. / It is our duty / to examine all those means / 
 with ])eculi}ir attention, / and to choose the best and most effect- 
 ual. / It is our duty / to draw from nature. / tVom reason, / 
 
THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE 373 
 
 from examples, / the jnstest principles of i)oliey, / and to pursue 
 and apply them / in the formation of our government. / 
 
 Alexander Ha mil Ion. 
 
 Read it, observing those group pauses. Then mark 
 it otherwise, as, for instance, making a pause after 
 ''establishment" and leaving out the one after "govern- 
 ment." Make other similar readjustments and you will 
 discover that the exact way in which the speaker groups 
 his w^ofds gives much indication of the way he wants his 
 message accepted. In actual delivery, the correct group- 
 ing will take care of itself, if the rate is normal and if the 
 speaker is really attending to well prepared material. 
 
 The dramatic pause is a most effective device for giv- 
 ing emphasis to a passage. Such a pause made before the 
 thing to be emphasized, prepares the audience for the 
 stroke when it comes and raises their anticipation to a 
 high pitch. The pause after the emphatic passage gives 
 a moment for reflection, for the thought to penetrate with 
 undiminished force. Note the following and read it with 
 an impressive pause where the dash is used. 
 
 Of all the social, political and economic disgraces in our coun- 
 try, the blackest — child labor, is the most inexcusable. 
 
 Of all the social, political and economic disgraces in our eoun- 
 try. the blackest, child labor — is the most inexcusable. 
 
 Or even greater effect may be gained by pausing l)oth 
 l)efore and after the emphasized word "child labor." 
 
 If it is not overworked, the speaker can get remark- 
 able results w^ith the dramatic pause. 
 
 3. Force 
 
 1. Nature. — From the standpoint of the listener, force 
 is the loudness of the voice of the speaker. It measures 
 the distance at which the speech can be heard. 
 
 2. Physical Basis. — Physically, the force varies with 
 
374 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 variations in the pressure of the column of air which is 
 propelled from the lungs during speech, and that pres- 
 sure depends on the degree of completeness with which 
 the diaphragm is relaxed and the degree of pressure 
 exerted by the walls of the abdomen upon it. 
 
 3. Psychological Basis of Force Regulation. — A 
 speaker voluntarily tries to regulate his general force to 
 the space to be filled by his voice. Involuntarily, he uses 
 greater force on the Avords or passages which seem of 
 greater value or importance. This is stress. Of course 
 some words are deliberately stressed, but most stressing 
 arises unconsciously simply because the mind is thinking- 
 out the thought as one of greater importance than others 
 related to it. 
 
 4. Application. — A speaker should practice all degrees 
 of force so that he can adopt the jDroper force in a large 
 or small hall, without spoiling the quality of his voice 
 and without uttering shrill sounds of too high pitch. 
 This can be done readily enough if, in the practice, the 
 speaker regulates the pressure from the abdomen and 
 diaphragm and refrains from allowing his voice to ascend 
 the scale or change its pitch. Breathe deeply after the 
 approved manner. (Lesson 7, pages 115 to 122.) Then 
 as the air is steadily controlled by an even relaxation 
 of the' diaphragm, speak in a normal quality, full and 
 round, but quiet in force, as though speaking in a small 
 parlor. Then increase the pressure of the abdomen on 
 the slowly relaxing diaphragm and speak louder, as if 
 in a fair sized hall, without raising the pitch or changing 
 the normal quality. Continue to increase the loudness by 
 this method until you are talking as though in a great 
 theatre. Do not alloir the pitch to rise and preserve th(^ 
 normal quality. Then make variations in force alone by 
 control from the center. For exercise purposes, take 
 any passage you may wish. The Webster opening, quoted 
 in this lesson, will do. 
 
THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE 375 
 
 If the speaker can control bis general force in this way, 
 can secure a full, carrying voice without any element of 
 shrill calling or strained shouting, he has a most valu- 
 able possession. 
 
 Just as it is w^ell to begin with a rather slow rate, so 
 it is best to open a speech in a tone slightly below normal 
 in force. This compels the audience to become quiet 
 and give its attention promptly. The subdued force and 
 slow rate should be maintained for a while, and then the 
 speaker may gradually increase the force until he finds 
 the best accommodation to the room. The force thus 
 fixed upon becomes -the normal one for that speech and 
 variations for emphasis are made above and below it. 
 It is not only offensive to the audience but wearing on the 
 speaker to exert more force than the place to be filled 
 calls for. Just the right force conveys an impression of 
 self-possession, mastery, and reserve power. 
 
 We have remarked that certain passages can be made 
 more emphatic by delivering them with greater force. 
 But they can also be made emphatic by a delivery of 
 impressive, subdued force. Eead the underlined part first 
 with increased force and then with subdued force. 
 
 But I say to you, The judgments of the Lord are true and 
 rii^hteous altogether. 
 
 This device of lowering the voice is often very effective. 
 It is useful not only to emphasize a passage but also to 
 secure attention when a murmur is heard in the audience. 
 The sudden quiet attracts attention and stops annoyances. 
 
 4. Pitch 
 
 1. Nature. — By pitch we mean that characteristic of 
 a sound which places it high or low on the musical scale. 
 Of course the words high and low" are figurative. We 
 might just as well say shrill and sober. 
 
876 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 2. Physical Basis. — The pitch of a sound is deter- 
 mined by the rapidity with which the puffs of air from the 
 lungs escape through the lips of the vocal cords. The 
 pitch of a siren whistle depends upon the number of puff's 
 of air which escape through its tube each second. Here 
 the principle is the same. But the mechanism which reg- 
 ulates the speed with which these vocal lips close and open 
 and thus let the puffs through, is very intricate. There 
 are many little muscles which draw the vocal cords tense 
 so that they move rapidly, or relax them so that the move- 
 ment is slow. Furthermore the cords are controlled so 
 that they come only partly together or wholly so, so that 
 they move part of their length or their entire length. All 
 these things control the nature and speed of the escaping 
 puffs and determine the pitch of the resulting sound. A 
 speaker need not think of this mechanism at all ; it takes 
 care of itself. He simply thinks of the sound he is to 
 produce, and the mind, giving the order, sets the mech- 
 anism in operation with absolute precision. In most 
 cases, all the speaker need do is to think his ideas and 
 not even have his mind on the sound. 
 
 3. Psycliological Basis. — Changes in pitch, known as 
 inflections, take place naturally as ideas form themselves 
 in definite relations to each other and to the receiving 
 audience. Thus when one idea is more important than 
 another and is to receive stress on the word that repre- 
 sents it, there is a natural rise in pitch preceding the 
 stress and a recovery afterward. When a logical pause 
 is reached and the thought is not completed but needs one 
 or more such word-groups to complete it, the voice nat- 
 urally makes a slight upward bend in pitch. Thus you 
 
 say, '*As Webster addressed the audience " and the 
 
 voice goes up, indicating that the relation of what shall 
 be said to what has been said is that of something neces- 
 sary to complete its sense. The fall shows completed 
 sense and takes place naturally at the end of the state- 
 
THE EXPRESSIVE VOICE 377 
 
 ment of a complete idea, When the attitude toward the 
 audience is one of interrogation, tlie voice slides up or 
 down in pitch to indicate to them the notion that an 
 answer of this or that sort is wanted. Note the upward 
 slide in "Are we to stand idly by in this crisis?" and the 
 downward slide in "Who is so base as would be a bond- 
 man ? ' ' 
 
 4. Application. — All the inflections take care of them- 
 selves if the speaker is well prepared in his thought. In 
 the paragraph above we have not enumerated all the 
 various inflections known to technical elocution, but we 
 have given enough to show that inflections flow naturally 
 from the relationship which the ideas about to be ex- 
 pressed hold in the mind of the speaker. His attention 
 should not be on inflections ; it should be on ideas. 
 
 But one may well look carefully to the normal pitch of 
 his voice. Inflections are variations above or below the 
 normal pitch or average key in which a man speaks. It 
 is wise to cultivate a fairly low pitch. If the speaker has 
 learned how to breathe correctly and he is calm and self- 
 possessed during delivery, it is very probable that his 
 pitch will be low. By this we do not mean to advise the 
 assumption of a ponderous double bass. We merely wish 
 to warn against the irritating high pitch with which many 
 speakers annoy their auditors. Listen carefully to your 
 voice and determine if it has a good middle pitch. If it 
 is too shrill, practice for a lower pitch. The higher the 
 pitch, the more tension on the vocal cords and the sooner 
 the voice gives out; the lower the pitch, the greater the 
 relief and possibility of sustained effort. 
 
 Some speakers, especially those of the cart-tail variety, 
 have an annoying habit of finishing every impressive 
 statement with rising inflection. It is a sort of challenge, 
 defying contradiction. Eead these words with a strong 
 upward inflection on the last and you will get our idea : 
 
 "This candidate is the greatest patriot of the age!" 
 
378 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Of course the sense calls for a downward inflection. If 
 you have fallen into any such spell-binding vices, elimi- 
 nate them as soon as possible, 
 
 5. Conclusion 
 
 If the speaker masters breathing and control and then 
 practices for various modulations in quality, force, pitch, 
 and rate, he will develop a wonderful instrument for 
 expression, a sympathetic musical accompaniment for the 
 words which symbolize his thoughts. The expressive 
 voice adds much to the bare vocabulary and logic of the 
 speaker. 
 
 We no longer recommend that speeches which are 
 expected to do real work should be memorized. But we 
 do believe that it is well to memorize and practice the 
 declamation of passages from the works of great orators 
 as an exercise in modulation. Take impressive selections 
 and deliver them as an actor would, giving every ounce 
 of meaning to the passage that your voice can contrib- 
 ute. Take argumentative passages, which require care- 
 ful inflection, emotional passages which call out many dif- 
 ferent qualities, earnest passages which call for varying 
 degrees of force. In short, the practicing of matter 
 already composed, with the purpose in view of making the 
 most of them vocally, is a good exercise to give you easy 
 control over all the powers of your voice. It also removes 
 the restraint which keeps many speakers from showing 
 their real feelings in their voices. We recommend there- 
 fore declamation for practice, and in actual delivery, 
 attention to thoroughly prepared thought and earnestness 
 of purpose. 
 
THE EXPRESF^IVE VOICE 379 
 
 Assignment op Work 
 
 TIk' Avrittfu exercises in this entire lesson slimild bo 
 ciuciully worked out. Keep copies of tlie written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 Firsit Day. — Road the less^on through twice and review thoroughly 
 Lesson 7. 
 
 Second Day. — Read some book of oratorical selections and pick 
 out one which appeals to you and which has quite a range 
 of feeling. Then copy it and make an emotion analysis 
 similar to the one we have made for the Lincoln's Second 
 Inaugural. Then practice reading with the proper cjuality 
 changes. Keep your mind primarily on the thought and 
 feeling so that the quality is the natural result of your 
 emotion. 
 
 Third Day. — Take another selection and mark in the margin 
 the proper rates. Thus use the degrees normal rate, slow 
 rate, very slow ; fast rate, very fast. The idea is to indi- 
 cate what you think would be desirable rate modulations 
 to make in consideration of the audience. Append a note 
 describing the kind of audience to which you imagine the 
 speech is delivered. If you can prepare an original speech, 
 so much the better. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Practice the exercise on degrees of force. Make 
 up a short announcement and deliver it first to ten imag- 
 inary people, then to fifty, to two hundred, to a thousand, 
 to two thousand. This exercise should be practiced very 
 often. 
 
 Fifih Day. — 'Make a complete analysis of your own voice and 
 vocal habits, noting faults. ]\Iake notes after the following 
 items : 
 
 1. Quality— flexibility 
 
 2. Force (a) Normal 
 
 (b) Flexibility 
 
 (c) Control 
 
 8. Pitch (a) Normal key, high or low 
 
 (b) Flexibility 
 
 4. Rate (a) Normal, how many words a minute, av- 
 
 erage 
 
 (b) Ability to accommodate 
 
 5. Special faults or peculiarities 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for tne student to use in testing- 
 his knowledge of the principles m this lesson. They 
 aie suggest ire merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What is meant by elocution? Is the study of elocution 
 of any value to the i)i"actical public speaker? Why? 
 
 2. In what respt^cts can the speaking voice be modified? 
 What is the purpose or function of these modulations? 
 
 ;i Can you gi^■e a detinition of quality ? Of human quality? 
 Of individual quality .' Of special, emotion quality ? 
 
 4. What is the physical basis of quality? Which of the two 
 kinds of resonation walls plays the larger part in (juality changes? 
 
 5. Explain why a change in quality expresses a change in 
 emotion. 
 
 6. Do you believe that the emotion analysis of the Lincoln 
 selection is correct ? What modifications or additions could you 
 make ? 
 
 7. What is the best way for a speaker to control his quality 
 during delivery ? Should he think about quality ? 
 
 8. What are the two sources of rate control? 
 
 !). Can you give the three rules selected as important in rela- 
 tion to rate control? 
 
 10. What are the two kinds of pauses;' Where dn the logical 
 pauses take place? 
 
 n. Of what value is the dramatic pause? 
 
 12. What is meant by general force? What is the most com- 
 mon speaking fault connected with force? I low can it be 
 cured ? 
 
 LS. Can you get emphasis by reduced force? Is it wise to 
 do so sometimes? 
 
 14. What is the nalure of inflection? Can inflections be con- 
 sciously controlled ? 
 
 IT). Whv is it well lo have a faii-lv low. nornuil, or average 
 
 pilch.' 
 
 :^'0 
 
LESSON 21 
 
 GESTURES 
 
 In the last lesson, we spoke of the expressive voice 
 and its contributions to the message of the speaker. The 
 effects of well-selected words were considered as supple- 
 mented by the modulations of the voice. But besides this 
 appeal which the speaker makes to the ear of the audi- 
 ence, he also makes an appeal to the eye by his bodily 
 attitudes, his gestures, and the expressions of his face. 
 It is the appeal to the eye which we shall discuss in this 
 lesson. The expressiveness of bodily postures and move- 
 ments must not be overlooked, for much meaning is added 
 to the message by them. Indeed, a single flash of the 
 eye, a turn of the hand, a forward swing of the body, 
 may say more than all the words in an entire address. 
 
 1. Causes of Gestures 
 
 Broadly speaking, gestures may be divided into two 
 great groups according to tlie causes which start them. 
 There may be an involuntaiy, natural impulse or there 
 may be a voluntary and deliberate desire to use a ges- 
 ture to supplement words. Let us explain first the invol- 
 untary gesture which almost always expresses feeling 
 and not intellectual discernment. 
 
 We have said that a feeling of any sort, and especially 
 a sudden emotion, consists not only of a mental state, 
 but also of a complete adjustment of the physical organ- 
 ism. In anger there are the changed circulation and 
 breathing and the tenseness of the muscles. Any move- 
 
 381 
 
382 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ment made at that time will show the existing muscular 
 tenseness and express the inward state of the maker of it. 
 The physical adjustment peculiar to an emotion influ- 
 ences the character of any posture and movement at the 
 time the emotion is experienced. 
 
 Then there are reactions which are natural to certain 
 situations and which have been handed down through 
 the ages. When aggressively angry we thrust out the 
 chin, draw back the lips, and throw the body forAvard. 
 This was the threatening attitude which our prehistoric 
 ancestor presented to his foe. When we feel in the same 
 way, even though we are not preparing for a physical 
 encounter, we assume the same attitude. It is a reflex 
 or habitual response which goes with the situation. Wlien 
 a disagreeable odor is near, the edges of the nostrils 
 draw up. When w^e are experiencing the emotion of 
 resentment or offense, the nose is turned up also. Conse- 
 quently it is clear that there is a deep biological and 
 psychological basis for involuntary gestures, for the atti- 
 tudes which we promptly and unconsciously take when 
 the mind is assailed with certain thoughts with strong 
 feeling associations. These gestures show themselves 
 promptly just as quality changes of the voice do, and they 
 are also almost entirely out of the control of the speaker. 
 
 On the other hand, the voluntary gestures are made 
 deliberately because the speaker considers that they will 
 help him express his ideas. Thus one says, ''The box 
 Avas about so long and so wide," holding his hands apart 
 the appropriate distances. One might say, sweeping his 
 hand before him, ''There stretched the vast prairie as 
 far as the eye could see." He deliberately makes the 
 gesture to enforce the idea of expanse and to cause the 
 picture to arise more vividly. But even many of these 
 gestures are made without previous intent on the part 
 of the speaker; they simply take place as he utters the 
 words in harmony with them. Consequently wo can say 
 
GESTURES 383 
 
 that by far the greater number of gestures are made 
 without conscious direction and come into existence as 
 certain ideas and feelings flood the mind of the speaker. 
 This is an important thing to know, because it will 
 enable us to view the study and practice of gestures in 
 a sensible light. From it we gather that the study of a 
 system of gestures is not of value to enable a speaker to 
 make a gesture deliberately (though it does serve this 
 purpose for the actor), but it is valuable (1) because it 
 affords an orderly and well arranged group of exercises, 
 (2) because the movements made consciously in the exer- 
 cise may become a part of the speaker's expressional 
 equipment and take place spontaneously during delivery, 
 and (3) because it will offer a systematic basis for the 
 criticism of other speakers. But before we take up the 
 significance of particular gestures, it will be well to out- 
 line some general exercises to give readiness and grace 
 of movement. 
 
 2. General Principles and Exercises 
 
 The first principle to note is that wdien a gesture is 
 made, there is a combined and harmonious movement of 
 the whole body, the arm, and the hand. The contribu- 
 tions of all these three are most evident in large, sweep- 
 ing gestures, but they exist in varying degrees and 
 proportions in all gestures. To make this clear and also 
 to afford a helpful exercise we recommend the use of 
 Indian clubs. 
 
 Observe the diagram, which gives five simple move- 
 ments to be tried separately at first and then in various 
 combinations. If you have no clubs, you can make the 
 movements with the free, open hand. In that case, the 
 palm should be open and flexible and there should be an 
 easy give in both wrist and fingers. Indeed, after prac- 
 ticing with the clubs, the free hand exercise should be 
 used as a transition to gesture execution. 
 
384 
 
 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 
 Fig-. 1. 
 
 Exercise A. Stretching the hand up as far as possible, 
 describe a giant circle with the shoulder as the center. 
 Notice the slight sway or accommodation of the body. 
 Notice also the flexible give of the wrist. The weight of 
 the club makes these things not only evident but inevit- 
 able. Practice without the club and get the same sym- 
 pathetic sway of the body and turn of the wrist. Do not 
 stiffen the fingers but keep them fairly limp. Now do the 
 exercise with both arms at the same time, first with both 
 hands crossing in front together, then timed so that while 
 one hand is stretched out to the side the otluM- is ci-ossiug 
 in front. The arms then pass the face alternately. In 
 connection with gesture work, the movcmcnis should 
 always be in the directions indicated by the arrows. 
 Never reverse. 
 
 E.rercise B. St retell tlie hand up as far as possible 
 obli(|uely as though the man in the diagi'am were ti-ying 
 
GESTURES 385 
 
 to touch the letter B. Then with the elbow as the center 
 make a movement of the hand that describes what is 
 roughly a circle. Notice the accommodating motion of 
 the shoulder and upper arm as well as the sw^ay of the 
 body. The last is less in this exercise than in Exercise A. 
 Practice with and without clubs, with one hand and with 
 both as in Exercise A. Observe the greater finger and 
 wrist flexibility needed here. 
 
 Exercise C. Begin by stretching the hand out to the 
 side at the level of the waist. Describe the ellipse. No- 
 tice that both shoulder and elbow come into equal play. 
 The sway of the body is slight and there is some wrist 
 and finger flexibility. 
 
 Exercise D. This is the most valuable of all, for it 
 calls for shoulder and elbow rotation and movement in 
 all parts of the arm as well as a high degree of flexibility 
 in wrist and fingers. Notice how the back of the wrist 
 seems to lead the way in the movement and see that the 
 hand on the return movement, down and toward the 
 body, seems to float palm down, while on the outward 
 sweep it is palm up. Yet each position of hand and 
 fingers melts almost imperceptibly int'o the next. 
 
 Exercise E is similar to D, but it is in the lofty plane 
 and calls for even greater hand and wrist freedom, with 
 less elbow and shoulder action. It is the t^^aical 
 ''hurrah" gesture. 
 
 As soon a« the student gets a sense of whole bodily 
 cooperation and flexibility, the clubs should be used less 
 and less and the free hand movements resorted to more 
 and more. It will be observed that we cannot call a 
 movement wholly hand, or wholly forearm, or full arm; 
 one may predominate, but a gesture is an integral part 
 of an entire body change and attitude. 
 
 Having cared for the larger aspects, we may give a 
 little more detailed consideration to the hand. First 
 consider the supine hand, witli palm up (see figure 2). A 
 
386 
 
 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 — Supine Hand. 
 
 gesture terminating with the pahn in this position is 
 called a supine gesture. Observe that the thumb is fairly 
 free of the palm though not 
 sticking out at right angles. 
 The fingers fall naturally as 
 illustrated, being neither 
 spread wide apart nor stuck 
 rigidly together. Certainly the 
 palm is not stiff. The whole 
 appearance is of ease and flexibility with no suggestion 
 of cramp or stiffness. 
 
 Some students have a tendency to stiffen the palm, 
 cup the palm, spread the fingers, stick out the thumb too 
 far, or turn the thumb in. The following exercise is 
 designed to overcome such defects and cause the hand 
 to fall in the proper disposition at the stroke of a 
 gesture : 
 
 Exercise F. Hold the hand before you, with back of 
 the wrist up and the finger drooping limply (figure 3). 
 Then wring vigorously as though to flick 
 off water. Continue this for some time 
 and then terminate it by having the hand 
 fall in the supine position. Then practice 
 a number of gestures calling for the supine 
 hand, with appropriate words such as: 
 
 I — I present you with tMs. 
 II — That is all the information I have. 
 Ill — Behold, how simple. 
 
 {Nute — Gesture on word in italics.) 
 
 After this, repeat exercise I) with particular attention 
 upon the supine hnnd at tlu' part of the curve farthest 
 from the body. 
 
 If the free movements and the supine hand position, 
 practiced for in exercises A, B, C, D, E, and F, are per- 
 fected, other movements and liand ])Ositions, to be 
 
GESTURES 387 
 
 described later, will in most cases take care of them- 
 selves. 
 
 3. Significance of Gesture 
 
 There are many systems which are supposed to give an 
 orderly explanation of the meaning of this or that ges- 
 ture. Most of them are suggestive rather than scientific. 
 Our abstract is based on the system devised by Austin, 
 and published in his Chironomia in 1806. 
 
 1. Law of Particularity. A gesture directly in front 
 indicates a single particular thing; one slightly to the 
 side (oblique) takes in several; one on the side (lateral) 
 includes very many. Or in general, front gestures are 
 most particular while lateral gestures are most general. 
 Those made obliquely backward refer to what is remote 
 in time or space. 
 
 Illustration: Say 
 
 I — ^'I appeal to you, sir," making a horizontal 
 gesture in the front plane (h. o., see figure 4) with 
 hand supine. 
 
 II — I appeal to these gentlemen (gesture hori- 
 zontal oblique). 
 
 Ill — I appeal to the whole world (gesture hori- 
 zontal lateral). 
 
 IV — I appeal to the history of the past (gesture 
 horizontal, oblique backward). 
 
 This law holds for ascending and descending as well 
 as horizontal gestures. Using the descending gesture 
 (first bringing the hand up in the oblique plane to the 
 level of the chest in each case and then making it descend 
 smartly to the place noted, with hand supine) practice 
 these three examples to indicate the law that the more 
 particular the thought, the more the gesture verges to 
 the front plane : 
 
388 
 
 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPExVKING 
 
 a. f. ^ascending- front, a. o. -ascending oblique, a. 1. =ascending lateral, 
 h. f. = horizontal front, h. o. = horizontal oblique, h. l.=:horizontal lateral. 
 a. t. — descending front, d. o.=desce7iding oblique. 6. \.= descending lateral. 
 Gesture can also be made oblique backward at all levels. 
 
 I — I stand on this sinf/lc principle (descending- 
 front) . 
 
 II — I stand on tltrsc. principles (descending ob- 
 lique). 
 
 Ill — I stand on all the principles of law and justice 
 (descending lateral with sweep throiigliout the words 
 preceding latr). 
 
 2. Law of the Planes. The ascending plane is said to 
 be the plane of the spirit, the horizontal plane that of 
 the mind, and the descending thai of ihc hod//. Aspira- 
 
GESTURES ;389 
 
 tions, hopes, ideals, and all lofty things take the upper 
 plane; rational and rhetorical utterances take the hori- 
 zontal; and physical, active, and colloquial matters go 
 below. Strong assertions tend to have descending- 
 gestures because there is associated a potentiality of 
 physical enforcement. Some writers have said that all 
 assertions take descending gestures, but this is not 
 universally true; there is merely a tendency in that 
 direction, for often we find assertions accompanied by 
 other gestures, such as horizontal front with index finger. 
 Examples: 
 
 I — We are guided by a single, altruistic ideal 
 (lofty and particular, takes ascending front). 
 
 II — My reason approves this measure ; let me offer 
 it to you for your judgment (rational and particular, 
 takes horizontal front; repeat gesture in this illus- 
 tration). 
 
 Ill — To do this is customary (colloquial and par- 
 ticular, takes descending front). If it is a simple 
 colloquial matter, make gesture gently; if a strong- 
 assertion, make it vigorously. 
 
 This last may take horizontal front if, in saying 
 the words, you are appealing for judicious agree- 
 ment. It may take the ascending front if you have 
 in mind something sacred or deserving of reverence 
 in the custom. 
 
 Examples of assertions in descending plane. Vigorous 
 physical action possibilities present. 
 
 I — I denounce the agreement (descending front). 
 II — I reject the proposals (descending oblique). 
 Ill — I despise them all (descending- lateral). 
 IV — I cast them all into utter oblivion (descend- 
 ing oblique back). 
 Now it is evident that the planes horizontal to the floor 
 and those perpendicular to the floor give, at their points 
 
390 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 of intersection, tlie names of the gesture, since they 
 designate the place where the hand comes to restj- Thus 
 the front plane is intersected by the ascending to give 
 ascending front, by the horizontal to give horizontal 
 front, and by the descending to give descending front. 
 Thus we have a total of twelve positions for the right 
 hand. We have a similar twelve for the left and the 
 possibility of another twelve where the hands are used 
 together in two-handed gestures. 
 
 4. The Making of a Gestuke 
 
 Thus far we have discussed the significance of gestures 
 when made, but now we must go into the details of each 
 movement. The hand does not shoot out abruptly to the 
 desired place. There is a preparatory movement, then 
 the execution which terminates in a stroke or ictus, and 
 finally, the return movement. 
 
 Assume the normal position in action (see page 109, 
 Lesson 7) with the two hands hanging naturally at ease 
 by the sides. 
 
 (a) The Preparatory Movement consists in bringing 
 the hand (palm down) up to about the level of the chest, 
 in the oblique plane. As it rises, the palm slowly turns, 
 so that at the point of rest the palm faces toward the left 
 and the back of the hand to the right. 
 
 (b) The Execution of a descending front gesture car- 
 ries the hand smartly downward, the palm turning more 
 upward as it descends. It arrives at the point, descend- 
 ing front. 
 
 (c) Ictus. At the moment it reaches that point, the 
 fingers, which have been curled in somewhat, snap out 
 to the true supine position (see figure 2). This stroke or 
 ictus takes place on the accented syllable of the empha- 
 sized word. It gives character and force to the gesture. 
 
 (d) The Beturn is a recovery to the position of rest. 
 
GESTURES 391 
 
 The executionary movement for all gestures begins 
 where the preparatory movement ends and carries the 
 hand down, out, or up to the desired position. But the 
 two movements are continuous ; that is, except in special 
 cases where there is arrested preparation. In the hori- 
 zontal lateral, for instance, the hand does not rise directly 
 to that place, but passes, in x^reparation, through hori- 
 zontal oblique. 
 
 Now, before a mirror, practice all the twelve positions 
 enumerated on page 388, making the preparation through 
 horizontal oblique. 
 
 Remember the snap of wrist and fingers (ictus), whicli 
 terminates the gesture at the j^roper place. 
 
 3. Law of Force. Some gestures are forceful and 
 some weak, to indicate energetic or mild mental attitudes. 
 The law is as follows : Gestures are forceful in propor- 
 tion to the distance through which they pass, the speed 
 of their execution, and the muscular tension involved in 
 their delivery, 
 
 (a) Distance. This means great preparation up to the 
 usual point, chest high, just described, or even higher. 
 Make the assertion 
 
 ''I will never submit," 
 
 with descending front gesture. 
 Now make it most energetically bringing the hand in 
 preparation, on the words I will, well above the head. 
 This insures a greater distance of executio-nary move- 
 ment. 
 
 (b) Speed. Note how the speed increases with added 
 vehemence. 
 
 (e) Tension. Observe the tenseness of your forearm, 
 in particular as the ictus is given, and also note that the 
 whole body is, to a certain extent, tense also, in sympathy. 
 
 By way of contrast, with the same descending front 
 destination of the hand, say 
 
 ■ ''Isuhmit.'' 
 
392 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Note that the preparation is almost notliing; there is a 
 slow movement and muscular laxity. Indeed the gesture 
 consists of little more than a slow, nerveless turn of the 
 hand. Bodily laxness is such as to give even a slight 
 bend at the hips. 
 
 Now practice all the gestures in the series, with the 
 right hand, varying the distance of preparation, the speed 
 of execution and the muscular tension. Practice before 
 the mirror and observe effects. Remember that the 
 whole body must sway with the gesture. Read once more 
 pages 107 to 111 of Lesson 7. 
 
 TWO HAXDS 
 
 Gestures are made by the right hand as a rule if the 
 speaker is right handed. Occasionally the left is used 
 to refer to something on that side or to give variety and 
 contrast. But sometimes a two handed gesture is needed. 
 
 Two hands do not give greater intensity, they rather 
 give greater warmth. Ilhey add affection, whole-hearted- 
 ness, and tenderness. Give these two examples : 
 
 I — I u-flcome you, sir, to this hall (right hand hori- 
 zontal, front). 
 
 II— I welcome you with affection to this hall (both 
 hands horizontal front). 
 
 Now repeat either example with both hands horizontal 
 oblique, then both hands horizontal lateral. Observe as 
 the arms are flung wider apart the welcome is warmer 
 and more whole-hearted. 
 
 TIAXD DISPOSITIONS. 
 
 Thus far we have spoken only of (a) the supine hand 
 (figure 2), but the hand may be disposed in other ways 
 than this. 
 
GESTURES 
 
 893 
 
 (b) The Prone Hand (fii^ui'c 
 5) is the opposite of the supiiio. 
 The supine is communicative, 
 the prone repressive. 
 
 Exam pies: 
 
 Prone Hand. 
 
 I — Speak forth freely (supine, horizontal front). 
 II — Keep silent (prone, horizontal front). 
 
 The supine hand is cheerful, the prone gloomy. 
 Examples: 
 
 I — Behold the happy day (both hands, liorizontal 
 lateral supine). 
 
 II — How sad these autumn woods (both hands, 
 horizontal lateral prone). 
 
 The supine permits, the prone refuses ; the supine im- 
 pels, the prone compels ; the supine is genial, the prone is 
 severe. Of course all ideas of physical or figurative cov- 
 ering or concealing, take prone gestures in appropriate 
 planes. 
 
 (c) The Vertieal Hand indicates aversion, repulsion, 
 abhorrence. 
 
 Examples: 
 
 I — Forbid it. Almighty God (ascend- 
 ing front vertical). 
 
 II — Out of my sight, rascal (hori- 
 zontal oblique vertical). 
 
 Ill — Dismiss such absurd ideas 
 (both hands, horizontal oblique 
 vertical). 
 
 (d) The Clinehed Fist indicates agres- 
 siveness, force, vehemence, and resolve. In 
 descending gestures of assertion, it is stronger than the 
 supine hand because of its own significance and also 
 because it involves more muscular tension. 
 
394 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 (e) The Index Finger designates or points out witli 
 discrimination either physical things or mental things. 
 Examples: 
 
 I — Tluit is the man (horizontal lateral index). 
 II — Observe this point in the argument (hori- 
 zontal front index). 
 
 There are many other dispositions of the hand, such 
 as hands clasped, hands applied as in prayer, hands 
 folded, and arms folded, the discussion of which is in the 
 dramatic field rather than the o-ratorical. Obviously ges- 
 tures which are pure imitation or mimicry follow the 
 laws of no system. 
 
 5. Gestures ix Continuous Delivery 
 
 We have, so far, been practicing isolated gestures. In 
 actual delivery, they melt one into the other impercep- 
 tibly in certain passages, and in others they occur only 
 at long intervals. Much advice has been offered for and 
 against many gestures. As a matter of fact, no set rule 
 is trustworthy. What is true of one individual is not 
 true of another in effective, unaffected delivery, and what 
 is proper for a certain kind of passage would not do at 
 all for one of opposite nature. If you are naturally ani- 
 mated, buoyant, and full of bodily energy, you will have 
 more violent outward manifestations of emotional states 
 and your gestures will be more marked and more numer- 
 ous than if you are more restrained. A similar comment 
 holds for different passages by the same speaker. Sim- 
 ply be natural and let the gestures take care of them- 
 selves. Let the practice make its impress on your 
 general, bodily flexibility, but do not consciously follow 
 any rule of gesture during delivery. 
 
 In practicing a series of gestures, it is not always 
 necessary to have a recovery for each and a full ])repai'a- 
 
GESTUREH 895 
 
 tion for its successor, Tlie preparation of the gestures 
 of a series, other than the first, springs right from tlie 
 ictus place of its predecessor. Thus, saying "I admired 
 his virtue, mercy, and charity, ^^ one makes horizontal 
 front for virtue, horizontal oblique for mercy, and hori- 
 zontal lateral for charity, and the preparatory motion of 
 the second and third are simply 
 slight curves accomplished by the 
 wrist (see figure 7). 
 
 The same principle would hold 
 if the second and third gestures 
 were entirely unlike the first. 
 Take the following passage call- 
 ing first for horizontal oblique, 
 from which a small preparatory ^ .\l:est 
 
 movement is made in transition ^'^- '• 
 
 to the second executionary movement to ascending 
 lateral : 
 
 ''I place these things before you and may the Gods 
 
 (prep.) . .hor. obi sustain . slight prep asc. lat. 
 
 inspire your choice. ' ' 
 
 Very often it is not desirable to make two or more 
 gestures or even to repeat a single one, for the repeated 
 emphasis may be cared for by what is known as an 
 impulse or the mere repetition of the ictus. • For instance, 
 in the sentence, ''I admired his virtue, mercy, and char- 
 ity," one could make the horizontal oblique gesture on 
 the first word and merely repeat the ictus on the other 
 two. Furthermore such a sentence can be cared for by 
 a single gesture sweeping, in execution, through the three 
 words to horizontal lateral with its ictus on the last of 
 them. In each case, though, there is a different meaning- 
 conveyed. The three separate gestures give the notion 
 of three distinct and separate virtues; the ictus repeti- 
 tion merely repeats stress with a less complete demarca- 
 
396 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 tion of tlie kinds of excellence, while the single sweeping 
 gesture groups them all as parts of a single admirable 
 character. 
 
 6. Platform Conduct 
 
 While addressing the audience, do not keep your face 
 directed toward one spot only; talk to various parts of 
 the hall. In directing your remarks here and then there, 
 do not simply turn the head but turn the hips so that the 
 rotating motion starts from the ankles and carries the 
 shoulders with it. Of course this rotation does not take 
 place if you are moving about at the time. 
 
 This brings us to walking on the platform. Do this as 
 freely as you like so long as you do not abuse the j^ractice 
 and attract unfavorable notice to yourself by the amount 
 or nature of your pacing back and forth. Never turn 
 your back to the audience. In walking be economical 
 with your leg movements — that is, make only necessary 
 movements to cover a given space. Do not cross the 
 leg one in front of the other. In short, do not attract 
 attention to your walk; the audience is there to attend 
 to your thought. 
 
 7. COxNCLUSION 
 
 Practice all the gestures, in all postures — first quietly 
 in the normal position with weight on left foot ; then in 
 animation, balancing the weight on the forward, right 
 foot (see Lesson 7), and in all variations of foot position 
 and balance. Forward gestures should not cause you to 
 topy)le over or even reach out and stretch awkwardly. 
 
 Do all you can to master various gestures in different 
 attitudes and keep constantly at the fundamental exer- 
 cises, A, B, C, D, E, and F of this lesson. It will make 
 you more graceful and enable your body to speak in har- 
 monv with vour tongue. Then during deliverv, forget 
 
GESTURES 397 
 
 all about these things, and ])ay attoiitioii to yonr message 
 and your audience. 
 
 ASSKJN.MENT OF WORK 
 
 The written exercises in tliis entire lesson should bo 
 carefully worked out. K.'ep copies of tlie written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Review Lesson 7 and then read this lesson two 
 or three times. Answer the test questions. 
 
 S(co)td Day. — Practice exercises A, B, C, and D until they are 
 well mastered. Practice before a mirror and as you do so 
 keep in mind what was said on page 385 about the coml)ined 
 movement of the whole body. 
 
 Third Day. — Continue the other exorcises and take up P] and F. 
 Be sure of your hand flexibility. Then add the following 
 exercise : 
 
 Exercise G. Stand in the position taken by a fencer just 
 before he makes a thrust. This is firmly on both feet with a 
 distance of about twenty-four inches between them. Then 
 make a forward thrust, keeping the left hand by the trouser 
 leg and using the right hand as follows : — Describe the fig- 
 ure 8 as in exercise D, only time the thrust so that if 
 comes when the hand is farthest from the body. This is 
 a .sort of thrust with a flourish. Continue this with varying 
 degrees of forward plunge. It is a good exercise in balance.^ 
 
 Fourth Day. — Practice all the examples given under the three 
 laws and make up as many more examples of your own. 
 Also practice with the dispositions of the hands other than 
 supine. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Take a selection from one of the great orators and 
 write it out with a good space between the lines. Then 
 under the words which would naturally be delivered with a 
 gesture, mark, in red ink, the gesture you think appropriate. 
 I'se the designations used in this lesson ; for example, r. h., 
 hor. lat. sup. means right hand, horizontal lateral supine. 
 Think out whether an involuntary impulse due to settled 
 reflex or emotion would take place here or there, or whether 
 a deliberate gesture would be made. Determine whether a 
 series would be used, repetition or impulse. Send this in. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in tliis lesson. They 
 are sug-f/efitive merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the pinnciples, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What is meant by appeal to the ear and appeal to the 
 eye ? 
 
 2. Give the two general causes of gesture and the two sub- 
 divisions of the more primitive cause. Do animals gesticulate ? 
 
 3. What is the most general principle of motion in all ges- 
 tures ? Can we distinguish various body parts with the different 
 prominence in each gesture? Does the whole body enter into 
 every gesture ? 
 
 4. Can you do exercise A easily ? What muscles seem 
 most exercised by it? Do we ever make gestures of this sort, 
 or is the exercise of indirect benefit only? 
 
 5. Do you see any progressive plan of assistance in the work 
 of exercises A, B, C, D, and E ? What is the element of increas- 
 ing help? 
 
 6. What about the wrist movement and hand flexibility in 
 these gestures? What about the co-operation of body, whole arm. 
 forearm, wrist, and hand? 
 
 7. Do you make the supine gestures easily Avith the hand 
 ])roperly disposed ? Have you any hand difficulty ? Does exer- 
 cise F seem to help ? 
 
 Always prac- 
 tice before a mirror. 
 
 8. Name the twelve positions, using the intersection of the 
 three horizontal planes with the four vertical as a means of 
 designation. 
 
 9. Give the law of particularity. 
 
 10. Give the law of planes. 
 
 11. Give the law of force. Can you, from these three laws, 
 construct a fairly comprehensive system of gestures? 
 
 12. What are the parts of a gesture? Whicli part will give 
 the gesture precision if properly timed? 
 
 13. What is the significance of two-handed gestui-es as dis- 
 tinguished from the one-handed? 
 
 14. Contrast the supine and the projie hand. 
 
 15. What is the significance of the vertical liand .' Of the 
 index finger? Of the clenched fist? 
 
 16. In continuous delivery, does every gestiuv have a full 
 preparation? What is the best procedure? 
 
 17. Can you give a brief sunnnary of good i)Ia1f()nn conduct? 
 
 3!)8 
 
LESSON 22 
 
 HYGIENE FOR PUBLIC SPEAKERS 
 
 The subject of liygiene embraces all the means which 
 appertain to the preservation of health. Practical 
 hygiene uses every agency that will maintain the effi- 
 ciency of the body, w^ard off disease, and prevent dete- 
 rioration. It stops only at the threshold of medicine and 
 surgery. Hygiene is thus of interest to everyone, but 
 especially to the speaker, whose effectiveness depends 
 very directly upon his physical welfare. -But each calling 
 has dangers peculiar to itself. The miner who goes into 
 the depths of earth takes precaution against noxious 
 gases while the farmer on the prairie wears high leather 
 boots as a protection against the fangs of rattlesnakes. 
 The voice-user also has peculiar dangers against which he 
 must guard. We shall discuss aspects of general hygiene 
 which are of interest to the speaker, and also 'special 
 hygiene peculiar to him alone. 
 
 1. Mental Hygiene 
 
 All of us are affected in the production of ideas by our 
 habits of mind, so that any one line of thinking persisted 
 in influences all others. It is impossible for a man to 
 live continually in a realm of noble thought without 
 approaching each problem in a noble manner. On the 
 other hand, base thoughts color, and are reflected in, 
 whatever is expressed. Every man should be guided by 
 these truths and inhilnt at the outset undesirable tenden- 
 cies of the mind and stimulate activities in worthy 
 directions. 
 
 399 
 
400 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 The public speaker must be more watchful of liis 
 mind's cleanliness and health than others, for his speech 
 will reveal what is often concealed by men of other call- 
 ings. Not only is it true that no speaker can put into his 
 speech what is not in his soul, but it is also true that he 
 cannot keep his soul out of his speech. 
 
 Cheerfulness is also necessary. Do not worry or let 
 irritable spells hold sway. Concentrate on each task 
 mental and physical; finish it, and then drop it entirely 
 when the next one comes up. Do not brood over one 
 thing when the mind should be occupied with another, 
 resting, or engaged in recreation. 
 
 Mental rest is as important as bodily rest. Do not 
 stick to work of preparation or research when you are 
 ''stale." The I'esult will not pay you. Furthermore, do 
 not continue preparing, reading, and fixing outlines in 
 the mind up to the last minute before speaking. It is 
 better to stop work and take a walk or drive. Get out 
 in the fresh air and let the mind quietly assimilate what- 
 ever study has brought to it, even if the study is not so 
 complete as you could desire. The speech will be better 
 than one for which you have crammed up to the moment 
 of delivery. 
 
 2. General Physical Hygiene 
 
 Because we discussed mental hygiene in a section by 
 itself we do not mean to imply that mind and body are 
 separate, but rather that the subject-matter of the mind 
 may he considered separately. The vigor and energy 
 of mental operations depend directly on the health of the 
 body. Therefore the ability of a speaker to work up to 
 his best intellectual standard is partly, at least, deter- 
 mined by his licaltli. 
 
 Then also the insti-ument through which a s])('aker 
 communicates is his bodv. That bodv nnist l)e in n'ood 
 
HYGIENE 401 
 
 t'oiuUtion or it cannot adequately convey the thoughts of 
 the mind. One who is ill or physically weary shows his 
 weakness in his listless voice. Tones produced through 
 a sore throat or by vocal cords abused by misuse in 
 strained breath control, cause the audience to suffer in 
 sympathy with the speaker. Many things affect the 
 voice. Reserving disease for a brief remark (as befits 
 one not a physician, speaking to laymen), we shall con- 
 sider digestion, clothing, rest, breathing and phonation, 
 bathing, stimulants, mouth prophylaxis, and the speak- 
 er's habits. 
 
 3. Digestion 
 
 The problem of nutrition and digestion is an individual 
 one. Each must determine for himself what his system 
 needs and what he can digest. If the self-made rules are 
 violated, or if for some other reason indigestion takes 
 place, a man's speaking ability will surely be impaired. 
 The uncomfortable feeling at the pit of the stomach 
 keeps the mind annoyed while the distension of the organ 
 itself interferes with breathing. By all means watch 
 your digestion and, at the first signs of trouble, consult 
 a physician or administer your own home remedies. Do 
 not continue eating with utter disregard for consequences 
 which your experience tells you are sure to follow. 
 
 Even when the digestion is good, do not eat large 
 meals before speaking, and when possible let a period of 
 time elapse between the meal and the speech. Just after 
 a meal, the stomach is fullest and the lung capacity least. 
 Then also the action of the diaphragm is hampered, and 
 the smallest movement causes distress. The blood is 
 down below and not up at the throat and brain. 
 
 We recollect a trip with a college debating team to a 
 distant university. Just before the debate, the hosts 
 invited the guests to a good dinner, but the faculty 
 
402 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 advisor was strict in the limits of consumption he 
 placed upon the hungry heroes of the forum. He also 
 banned French fried potatoes and insisted on the more 
 digestible baked form. Every speaker is not accom- 
 panied at all times by a faculty advisor, but he would 
 do well to follow the kind of suggestions given to the 
 college boys. As an important speech approaches, eat 
 sparingly, even of nutritious and easily digested food. If 
 you are to speak after a dinner, do not indulge in all the 
 courses. Eemember that the ideal for singers is to put 
 four hours between the last meal and a performance ; the 
 ideal for a speaker calls for a two-hour interval. If you 
 cannot live up to the ideal, approach it as nearly as you 
 can. 
 
 4. Clothing 
 
 A discussion of clothing may well have many subdivi- 
 sions, but the hygienic aspects are two, namely, the influ- 
 ence of clothing on bodily temperature and its influence 
 on the circulation of the blood. It is difficult to say 
 whether an individual should dress heavily or lightly. 
 If begun early in life, it is best to wear very little clothing 
 and make a minimum difference between summer weight 
 and winter weight. This brings about hardiness and 
 resistance to colds — the great bugaboo of speakers. Yet 
 like diet, it is an individual matter. One thing, however, 
 is certain, the body should not be subjected to extremes 
 of temperature by sudd(Mi changes in clothing of varying 
 weight and cut. 
 
 A speaker wearing an overcoat and entering a warm 
 hall should remove tlie coat on entering. Similarly, after 
 an address, when the throat has been exercised, be care- 
 ful to protect it from sudden change when leaving the 
 building. Especially at night, in the open air, protect 
 the throat and chest. 
 
HYGIENE 403 
 
 Conceiniiii*,' constriction we can say that the clothing 
 at no part of the body should be so tiglit as to interfere 
 wit] I tlie superficial circulation or the mechanism of 
 breathing. Obviously the lacing of women violates both 
 these rules. Men usually dress so that the abdomen and 
 lower chest are free and the diajjhragm can do full, pow- 
 erful duty. The point of compression in their dress is 
 usually at the throat. Stand-up collars are bad. They 
 not only interfere with the circulation and delay the vital- 
 izing of the tissues in the capillaries, but they annoy the 
 speaker and hamper phonation. Turn-down collars suffi- 
 ciently large are better. With full dress, a fairly open 
 and amply large standing collar is a good compromise. 
 
 In connection with this topic, we may warn the speaker 
 against constriction which results from bending the head 
 to read notes on a table or reader's desk. Such bending, 
 with its accompanying compression at the throat, inter- 
 feres with the circulation and is hard on the breathing. 
 If notes must be consulted, they should be held where 
 they can be easily seen without bending the head. If 
 physical conditions on the platform are such that some 
 bending is unavoidable, bend from the Avaist so that the 
 posture of the torso is kept correct as described in Les- 
 son 7. There are not only hygienic advantages to be 
 derived from following this advice, but aesthetic gains 
 as well. 
 
 5. Rest 
 
 The speaker must have plenty of rest. Both his body 
 and his mind must come refreshed to his task. There 
 are men who seem to work incessantly, but they are pay- 
 ing for it in some way. Best results cannot be obtained 
 by working continuously without rest. On this point, 
 Bishop Buckley said, ''AVhen an important address is to 
 be delivered, the orator should begin the special care of 
 his body at least twenty-four hours before the time. 
 
404 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Henry Ward Beeclier, addressing the Clerical Union of 
 Brookljai, stated that this was his invariable practice, 
 and that, though he had a powerful constitution, he made 
 it a point to eat less and rest more as Sunday approached. 
 On his lecture tours he was in the habit of taking a short 
 nap just before going on the platform." 
 
 Similar to rest, in its effect, is plenty of fresh air. 
 It is the custom of many clergymen to prepare their 
 sermons during the early part of the week, to spend all 
 Saturday afternoon in the open air, and on Sunday to 
 rest, except when in the pulpit. This is an excellent 
 s-cheduie, for it suspends concentration on the speech 
 some time before delivery, it gives the body the benefit 
 of outdoor exercise, and it brings needed rest. 
 
 Long walks are good for the public speaker. They 
 afford a fine opportunity to meditate, to obtain the sanest 
 views of his subject, and at the same time to exercise in 
 the open air. However, long walks that tire should not 
 immediately precede a speech. 
 
 At night the window should be thrown wide open, so 
 that plenty of fresh air can come into the bed-room. The 
 body should l^e covered enough to prevent ill effects from 
 cold. 
 
 (). Breathing and Phonation 
 
 If the breathing is poorly controlled, ill effects will 
 follow. The tones produced will be bad and the vocal 
 cords as well as the pharynx may suffer from congestion. 
 It is very important that the breathing exercises sug- 
 gested in Lesson 7 be completely mastered. Indeed, good 
 deep breathing will not only prevent voice and other ail- 
 ments but may help to cure them when they exist. 
 
 In producing tones, the vocal cords should be used 
 for sound production and nothing else. They nuist not 
 be employed as trap doors to regulate the emission of 
 
HYGIENE 405 
 
 Mir. From the wind pipe up, all tiie agencies of speech 
 sliould be flexible and relaxed. If a feeling of constric- 
 tion is experienced in the throat, the tone is being badly 
 produced and the vocal cords abused. Relax immediately 
 and keep the mind on the diaphragm. That is where 
 the effort should be concentrated. As the air comes up 
 against the cords they should move freely and lightly to 
 produce the vocal murmur of varying pitches. Persist- 
 ence in incorrect phonation means the destruction of the 
 speaker's voice. 
 
 When the throat is tired, stop talking. Fatigue is the 
 warning, and to refuse to heed it means punishment. 
 When there is inflammation of the throat or larynx, do 
 not talk. Consult a doctor and rest until the speaking- 
 apparatus is normal again. If you must deliver a speech 
 with the throat in bad condition, a good temporary help 
 will be a gargle of luke-warm water w4th equal parts, of 
 powdered alum and salt. Dissolve in a tumbler of water 
 as much of each as could be put on a dime. The taste 
 of this mixture is bad, but it will give temporary relief, 
 until the speech is ended and you can get to a physician. 
 
 There should be no unnecessary straining of the vocal 
 cords by shouting, cheering, and prolonged singing. 
 Often there is temptation to join in rollicking songs, 
 where all sing at the top of the voice. This may be fun, 
 but it is a kind of fun which the singer must forego. Con- 
 gregational singing is usually bad in proportion to the 
 enthusiasm of those who join in. If the speaker is also 
 a trained singer and thoroughly understands the use of 
 the singing voice, he can use his own judgment with good 
 effect. 
 
 7. Bathing 
 
 The speaker should keep his skin in good condition by 
 frequent baths. Warm baths with the proper precautions 
 against cold are necessary to cleanse the pores. After 
 
406 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 each bath and every morning the speaker should sponge 
 the throat and chest with cold water. It is well to use 
 salt in this and in such cold plunges as may be desired 
 from time to time. A cold plunge every morning is excel- 
 lent if you can stand it. Remember though, it is more 
 valuable for its tonic effects than for its cleansing- 
 properties. 
 
 8. Drinking and Smoking 
 
 The speaker should neither drink alcoholic liquors nor 
 smoke. Though this is well known, but few live in 
 accordance with these suggestions. Alcoholic drinks are 
 bad for the system and especially bad for the throat with 
 its delicate mucous membrane. Whoever uses them must 
 understand that for the pleasure he gets from the indul- 
 gence he will pay in well being. Just before speaking, 
 such drinking is especially bad. It is injurious to the 
 physical mechanism of speech and even the apparent 
 mental stimulation is of an undesirable kind. One so 
 stimulated may acquire a sort of false brilliancy, but he 
 loses more in judgment. 
 
 The drinking of tea and coffee is a dietary question 
 wliicli must be settled by the individual. Both beverages 
 are mild stimulants which can be endured by some but 
 not by others. 
 
 Smoking is bad for the speaker. It has a tendency to 
 parch the throat and also to act unfavorably on the nerv- 
 ous system and the vocal cords. Particularly bad is the 
 smoking of cigars, x^ipes, and cigarettes after the west- 
 ern fashion. The eastern w^orshipper of Lady Nicotine 
 wisely filters his hot smoke through water. Further- 
 more, he uses mild tobacco. .A speaker who enjoys smok- 
 ing and who simply refuses to give up the practice might 
 do well to buy a Turkish hookah. This style of pipe 
 reduces the evils of smoking to a minimum. 
 
HYGIENE 407 
 
 We may consider here the traditional pitcher of ice 
 water on the speaker's stand. It ought to be abolished; 
 more harm than good is done by the "sip of cold water." 
 The throat in action should not receive a dash of cold 
 water. If there is congestion, as indicated by the hot 
 and parched feeling, the cold douche will simply insure 
 greater congestion when the reaction follows its appli- 
 cation. 
 
 To insure against dry mouth and throat, many things 
 have been suggested. Possibly the chew^ing of slippery 
 elm will do some good; it can do no harm. Most pre- 
 pared lozenges are bad for the stomach. A good demul- 
 cent to sip can be made with a little tragacanth g-um in 
 water. But if this be used, take it before beginning to 
 speak. It is a descent from the sublime to the ridiculous 
 for a speaker to stop in the middle of his address to take 
 a drink. 
 
 9. MoUTII HVGIENE 
 
 The mouth should be kept as aseptic and clean as 
 possible. Peroxide of hydrogen diluted with water is 
 good to use as a gargle and a mouth wash. The follow- 
 ing advice given by Doctor Mills in his book on A^oice 
 Production (page 262) may also be followed. 
 
 As the speaker and singer must often practice their art in an 
 atmosphere that is far from pure, they will do well to carry out 
 in a routine war some sort of mouth toilet on their return 
 home and the next morning. Various simple mouth and throat 
 washes may be used, such as (1) water with a little common 
 salt dissolved in it (2) water containing a few drops of carbolic 
 acid — just enough to be distinctly tasted; (3) Avater containing 
 listerine; (4) either of the last two with the addition of a pinch 
 of bicarbonate of soda to a teacupful of the Huid. when there is 
 a tendency to catarrh. 
 
 Of course the teeth should be brushed after each meal, 
 before retiring and on getting up in the morning. Then 
 also the speaker ^liould go once each year to the dentist 
 
408 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 to have his teeth examined. A little work done by the 
 dentist in time will save a great deal of trouble later. 
 All this care of the teeth and mouth is most necessary, 
 for bacteria multiply rapidly, and affections of the 
 mouth, tonsils, and throat have a powerful effect upon 
 the speaking' voice. 
 
 10. The Speaker's Habits 
 
 The instrument of the public speaker is his body. He 
 should take the greatest care of it possible. To keep in 
 the necessary robust health his habits should be regular. 
 He should follow the old rule of "earlj^ to bed and early 
 to rise." We all know the story of how Ben Franklin, 
 when being entertained by the most distinguished peo- 
 ple of France, at the proper time each evening, would 
 rise and excuse himself saying, ''It is now my usual hour 
 to retire." While such independence is not always tact- 
 ful or possible, an approximation to Franklin's regu- 
 larity in early sleep is desirable. 
 
 Regularity and simplicity in eating should also charac- 
 terize the speaker. In short, a simple, honest, uncrowded 
 life should be his if he is to keep in perfect condition. 
 This entails the sacrifice of many pleasures and indul- 
 gences, but the reward is worth the sacrifice. 
 
 .Assignment of Work 
 
 I'lic written exercises in tliis entire lesson should be 
 careful ly worked out. Keeji copies of tlie written exer- 
 cises ill voiir notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson through twleo and then test 
 yourself with the (luestions. Have you. in the past, violated 
 an.y of the rules of hygiene given in this lesson ? Are thei-e 
 any with whieh you do not agree? 
 
 Second Day. — Study the lesson again carefully, making a 
 tabulated summary of the advice given. Then make out a 
 weekly schedule for a speaker, assuming that he is to begin 
 
HYGIENE 409 
 
 preparing the speech on Simday and delivef it the follow- 
 ing Saturday. Assume that he is employed from eight to 
 four thirty every week day excei:)t Saturday, when he stops 
 at twelve o 'clock. ]\Iake out the daily schedule, from rising 
 to retiring, in great detail, even to the Innishing of the teeth. 
 
 Third Day.— Go back to Lesson 7 and practice all the breathing 
 exercises most carefully. Then combine the deep rhythmic 
 breathing with exercises A, B, C, D, and E of the last lesson. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Take the outline of a speech which j^ou have pre- 
 pared and go for a long walk. While walking, develop the 
 speech several times, talking silently. This is a good ex- 
 ercise in preparation for a speech provided it is not done 
 innnediately before the delivery in public. You will notice 
 that the throat is a bit tired after this exercise just as 
 though you had been actually speaking. That is one of the 
 reasons why a walk of this kind should not precede the 
 address proper. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Review once more the Reflection Hour on page 146 
 of Lesson 8. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These questions are for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are suggestive merely, dealing largely Avith the practical 
 application of the principles, and aic to he placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What is meant by hygiene, general hygiene, and special 
 iiygiene ? 
 
 2. Give your definition of mental hygiene and tell why the 
 speaker must give it more than usual care. 
 
 3. Is mental hygiene in any Avay related to the physical? 
 Is physicar welfare related to mental efficiency? 
 
 4. Can any general rules of diet he formulated which will 
 be of service to the speaker? 
 
 5. What are the rules concerning quantity of food which 
 may usually be followed by the speaker? 
 
 6. What are the two important things in dress that interest 
 the speaker? 
 
 7. What is to be said about the effect on a speaker of con- 
 sulting notes on a table or desk? 
 
 8. Give the inference you draw from Bishop Buckley's 
 statement about Beecher. What other thing, besides rest, is' of 
 importance to keep the speaker fresh and vigorous? 
 
 9. Why is it necessary to emphasize the fact that the vocal 
 cords should be used for the production of sound only? 
 
 10. What course should a speaker pursue when he feels 
 fatigued? What must he do when the throat is sore? 
 
 n. Has shouting or singing any bad effect on the speaker's 
 voice ? 
 
 12. Tell the respective uses of the warm bath, the cold bath, 
 and the cold spray or douche of the chest. 
 
 13. AVhat effect have alcoholic drinks on the mind during a 
 speech if taken immediatelv before? What effect have thev on 
 the throat? 
 
 14. What effect has smoking on the throat of the speaker? 
 What is the most harmless form of smoking ? 
 
 15. What do you think of the "sip of cold water" during the 
 delivery of an address? 
 
 16. Give a brief summary of the various precautions to 
 keep the mouth clean. 
 
 17. Can you give a few harmless mouth washes? Do you 
 know of others put u]) for commercial i)in'poses and sol<l under 
 patent names? 
 
 18. Give a brief summary of the ideal regulation of the daily 
 life of a speaker. 
 
 410 
 
LESSON 23 
 
 PRACTICAL SPEECH DIRECTIONS FOR SPECIAL OCCASIONS 
 
 There are many occasions on which one may have to 
 speak in this or that capacity. While we cannot possibly 
 list all these, there are certain ones of importance which 
 may well be selected for treatment. We shall, at first, 
 treat those speeches connected with mass meetings and 
 conventions, presenting samples of addresses to be made 
 when one must act (1) as organizer of a meeting, (2) as 
 temporary chairman, (3) as the permanent chairman or 
 spokesman of the meeting. Then we shall take up 
 speeches from the floor and later the addresses of toast- 
 master and others at a dinner. Last of all we shall con- 
 sider the set speeches of the regular "orators" of special 
 occasions. 
 
 Calling a Meeting 
 
 Meetings of unorganized bodies or mass meetings of 
 citizens for discussion, are usually called together by 
 public notice or general invitation. At the time of meet- 
 ing, someone interested in the object at hand must take 
 the initiative in speech. He may do one of two things, 
 either sketch briefly in an unbiased manner the reason for 
 the coming together, or simply say, "Will the meeting 
 please come to order? I shall be pleased to hear nomina- 
 tions for temporary presiding officer." If those present 
 are unacquainted and the enterprise is new, tlie introduc- 
 tory remarks are necessary and may be followed by a 
 ■411 
 
412 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 motion for iioniinatioiis. If those present are acquainted 
 and the purposes of the gathering fairly well known, the 
 self-appointed officer will show better taste and tact by 
 expressing no views. The following is a sample of the 
 brief explanation to be given when necessary: 
 
 Fellow citizens; this meeting' whs called in order that the tax 
 payers of the community might join in an expression of their 
 attitude toward the proposed change in the public lighting system. 
 As you have no doubt heard, the city authorities are planning to 
 discontinue illumination by gas and install electricity. The tax- 
 payers are interested because the improvement must be financed 
 by assessments upon them. It is therefore desirable that we or- 
 ganize our opinion for presentation at the general hearing on the 
 subject to be held next :\Ionday at the City Hall. My purpose 
 is not to go into the details of the initial cost of this new public 
 work which must be met by us, nor shall I discuss future serv- 
 ice and running expenses. ]\fy wish is merely to call you together 
 so that you may discuss these matters as you see fit. jMany here . 
 have made a study of the details of the proposed system of light- 
 ing, and we shall be glad to hear from them when the meeting 
 has been properly organized. ]\Iay I now receive nominations for 
 the position of temporary president of this gathering! 
 
 Duties of the Chairman 
 
 If the meeting is an isolated one and there is no expec- 
 tation of further meetings, the president is not called 
 temporary president, but simply chairman. When a tem- 
 porary presiding officer is chosen, it is expected that he 
 will preside at the first meeting, during which the perma- 
 nent officers of the organization or convention will be 
 nominated and elected. After liis election, the temporary 
 president takes the chair wdthout making a speech. He 
 then receives nominations for the office of temporary sec- 
 retary, who will keep a record of the acts of the meeting. 
 When this officer has been chosen and takes his place, 
 the meeting is ready to do business. 
 
 The secretary reads the call or announcement of the 
 meeting and the presi<leni then nuikes his address. It 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 413 
 
 may be similar to the example already given or it may go 
 more into detail. It should not be too decided on points 
 which will be later discussed for settlement by the meet- 
 ing. It may be decided on the necessity for action of some 
 sort but it is considered "steam roller" tactics for the 
 president to dictate precisely what shall be done, from 
 the chair. 
 
 In political gatherings for organization of a movement 
 and at conventions, the opening address of the president 
 is often the * ' key-note speech ' ' — the speech which sets the 
 tone of the meeting and outlines the general aims and 
 ideals of the gathering. The following is a very brief 
 sample. In real life, it would be much expanded. 
 
 Fellow citizens ; I thank you for the honor conferred upon me 
 by this election to the position of temporary president of what 
 may prove to be an epoch-making gathering. "We are here to 
 voice the sentiments of progressive democracy as against those of 
 political corruption and vested interest which has no justification 
 in morals or practical expediency. 
 
 Allied with no party and made up of men wlio have in times 
 past engaged in the activities of different parties, we shall forget 
 all lines of political cleavage and stand only for the best interests 
 of this city. We shall be gnicled by no other considerations than 
 Ihose of fundamental justice and business efficiency. The old- 
 line parties in national politics have made their nominations for 
 the coming city elections. Neither presents a candidate whom we 
 can approve. On the one hand we find named for mayor a man 
 who made his reputation as an attorney for a corporation, that 
 corporation became notorious through the corrupt methods it used 
 to secure a franchise Avhereby it obtained for itself our best strip 
 of river front land — a pleasant place which should have been 
 kept as a recreation spot where the poor might find rest and 
 come in touch with healing Nature, themselves, their children, 
 and their children's children forever. On the other hand we 
 have offered for our approval a typical grafting office holder Avho 
 as public treasurer was involved in contract scandals of the 
 most flagrant sort. What cares he for the people or the city ? He 
 owes his allegiance to the machine. His aim will not be efficiency 
 and the reduction of taxes ; rather will it be tlie placing of the 
 henchmen of his chief in well-paid city jobs, and tlie granting 
 of illegal privileges to the chief himself. 
 
414 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 So much for the candidates already in the field. What issues 
 are presented for consideration 1 None ! Each party attacks the 
 record of the other and throws mud at the opposing leaders and 
 candidates. And well they may, for their targets deserve the 
 shots. But neither supports a single reform, neither proposes 
 one improvement in administration, neither has a constructive 
 suggestion to make. 
 
 Yet how vast is the field of needed improvements! I shall 
 mention but a few things in which good citizens should take an 
 interest and which can be secured by intelligent nomination and 
 votibg. Our public school system needs reorganization and greater 
 support. The last new school was built four years ago, 'and the 
 city population increases steadily at the rate of five per cent a 
 year. Children are attending part time, there are not enough 
 sittings, and the teachers are underpaid. Why not eliminate 
 boodle contracts and give the money saved over to the proper 
 education of our children ? These fat contracts are another issue. 
 Our system of bidding and awards should he changed so that 
 no one can "get on the inside." We should see that the city 
 truly receives the best service for the least possible cost. 
 
 Our civil service is also in need of reform. It was considered a 
 great victory for honest and efficient government when, twenty 
 years ago, the Civil Service Bill was passed, — a bill designating 
 the form of examinations and qualifications for public service 
 in the various ranks. But our politician friends have got around 
 the provisions of that act by special rules and exceptions whereby 
 their own favorites are given favored chances. Furthermore they 
 have placed most of the important and well-paid positions on 
 the exempt list and such appointive positions are filled by the 
 boss. We must stand for efficiency and no favor, top to bottom, 
 in the civil service. Why not urge the engagement of a city 
 manager, independent of political parties, and place the whole 
 mechanism of employment under proper and safe regulations, 
 in his charge? 
 
 Gentlemen, I have said enough to express the spirit of this 
 meeting. I shall not enlarge upon the wretched condition of our 
 charities, the corruption in the police department and the ruin- 
 ous financial policy adopted by the old-line parties in the past. 
 Others will address you and treat all these topics thoroughly. 
 No doubt we shall be able to embody our sentiments in appro- 
 priate resolutions and begin a campaign of civic righteousne.ss. 
 It is my purpose merely to arouse your sense of public duty. 
 Let us set aside old prejudices, let us realize that party lines must 
 not persist in municipal affairs, and let us combine in a non- 
 partisan effort to secure good government — consciencious and 
 efficient service from our officials and public improvements for 
 the taxes we have to pay. 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 415 
 
 At a nominating convention, the "key-note speech" 
 outlines the situation faced by the party and touches on 
 the general policy to guide the platform construction. 
 The example just given can be followed in general style, 
 and with appropriate modifications, in plan. 
 
 Order of Business 
 
 We shall not go into parliamentary matters, but it may 
 be of service to a student to know the usual order of busi- 
 ness in the opening meeting of a convention, the organi- 
 zation of a movement, or the establishment of a society. 
 
 1. Call to order. 
 
 2. Election of temporary officers. 
 
 3. Beading of the call and temporary president's 
 
 opening address. 
 
 4. Appointment of committees on credentials and or- 
 
 ganization (if necessary). 
 
 5. Recess with informal talk while the committees are 
 
 deliberating. 
 
 6. Reports of committees on credentials and organi- 
 
 zation. 
 
 7. Election of permanent officers. 
 
 8. Installation of permanent officers. 
 
 9. Appointment of all committees. 
 
 10. Reading of communications. 
 
 11. Reports of committees. 
 
 12. Business. 
 
 13. Nominations and elections (assuming that to be 
 
 part of the business of the convention). 
 
 14. Adjournment. 
 
 CoNVEXTioN Speeches 
 
 We have already given examples of nominating 
 speeches in Lessons 2 and 3, and on page 25 of Lesson 
 2 is to be found a general type plan of such speeches. 
 
416 . EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Tl i.i or some similar, well-organized plan can be used, 
 with modifications to suit any. nominating occasion. 
 
 Tlie other business of the convention or public meet- 
 ing, is to settle matters of principle and policy to be em- 
 bodied in resolutions or a platform. In Lesson 19 we 
 quoted a speech by Patrick Henry (page 353) exemplify- 
 ing obstruction methods on the convention floor. The 
 following speech b}^ Alexander Hamilton, before a similar 
 convention in New York State to ratify the same Con- 
 stitution, illustrates floor rebuttal and constructive argu- 
 ment as well : 
 
 Mr. Chairman, the honorable member who spoke yesterday 
 went into an explanation of a variety of circumstances to prove 
 the expediency of a change in our national government, and the 
 necessity of a firm Union ; at the same time he described the great 
 advantages which this state, in particular, receives from the 
 Confederacy, and its peculiar weaknesses when abstracted from 
 the Union. In doing this he advanced a variety of arguments 
 which deserve serious consideration. Gentlemen have come for- 
 ward this day to answer him. He has been treated as having 
 wandered in the flowery fields of fancy, and attempts have been 
 made to take off from the minds of the committee that sober im- 
 pression which might be expected from his arguments. I trust, 
 sir, that observations of this kind are not thrown out to cast a 
 light air on the important subject, or to give any personal bias on 
 tlie great question before us. I wall not agree with gentlemen who 
 trifle with the wealmesses of our country ; nor will I suppose that 
 they are enumerated to answer a party purpose, and to terrify 
 with supposed dangers. No; I ])elieve these weaknesses to be 
 real, and pregnant with destruction. Yet, however w-eak our 
 country may be, I hope w^e shall never sacrifice our liberties. If, 
 therefore, on a full and candid discussion, the proposed system 
 shall appear to have that tendency, let us reject it ! P>ut let us 
 not mistake words for things, nor accept doubtful surmises as th(^ 
 evidence of truth. Let us consider the Constitution calmly and 
 dispassionately, and attend to those things only which merit con- 
 sideration. 
 
 No arguments drawn from embarrassment or inconvenience 
 ought to prevail upon us to adopt a system of government radic- 
 ally bad; yet it is proper that these arguments, among others, 
 should be brought to view. In doing tliis. yesterday, it was 
 necessary to reflect njum our situation : to dwell upon the im- 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 417 
 
 beeility of our Union ; and to consider whether we, as a state, 
 eould stand alone. 
 
 Although I am persuaded that this convention will be resolved 
 not to adopt anything that is bad, yet I think every prudent 
 man will consider the merits of the plan in connection with the 
 circumstances of our country ; and that a rejection of the Con- 
 stitution may involve most fa>tal consequences. I make these 
 remarks to show that though we ought not to be actuated by un- 
 reasonable fear, yet we ought to be prudent. 
 
 Sir, it appears to me extraordinary that while gentlemen in 
 one breath acknowledge that the old Confederation requires 
 many material amendments, they should, in the next, deny that 
 its defects have been the cause of our political weakness and the 
 consequent calamities of our country. I cannot but infer from 
 this that there is still some lurking favorite imagination that 
 this s.ystem, with corrections, might become a safe and permanent 
 one. It is proper that we should examine this matter. We con- 
 tend that the radical vice in the old Confederation is that the 
 laws of the Union apply to the states only in their corporate 
 eapacit.y. Has not every man who has been in our legislature 
 experienced the truth of this position? It is inseparable from 
 the disposition of bodies who have a constitutional power of 
 resistance, to examine the merits of a law. This has ever been 
 the case with the federal requisitions. In this examination, not 
 being furnished with those lights which directed the deliberations 
 of the general government, and incapable of embracing the gen- 
 eral interests of the Union, the states have almost uniformly 
 weighed them by their own local interests; and have executed 
 them only so far as answered their particular convenience or 
 advantage. Hence there has ever been thirteen ditferent bodies 
 to judge of the measures of Congress, and the operations of the 
 government have been distracted by their taking different 
 courses. Those which were to be benefited, have complied with 
 the requisitions ; others have totally disregarded them. Have 
 not all of us been witnesses to the unhappy embarrassments 
 which resulted from these proceedings? Even during the late 
 Avar, while the pressure of common danger connected strongly 
 the bond of our union, and excited us to vigorous exertions, we 
 have felt many distressing effects of the impotent system. How 
 have we seen this state, though most exposed to the calamities 
 of the war, complying, in an unexampled manner, with the fed- 
 eral requisitions, and compelled by the delinquency of others to 
 bear most unusual burdens! Of this truth we have -the most 
 solemn evidence on our records. In 1779 and 1780 when the 
 state, from the ravages of war, and from her great exertions to 
 resist them, became weak, distr'^ssed, and forlorn, every man 
 avowed the principle we now contend for; that our misfortunes, 
 
418 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING' 
 
 in a great degree, proceeded from the want of vigor, in the Con- 
 tinental government. These were our sentiments when we did 
 not speeulat^e, but feel. We saw our weakness, and found our- 
 selves its victims. Let us reflect that this may again, in all prolv 
 ability, he our situation. This is a weak state, and its relative 
 station is dangerous. Your capital is accessible by land, and by 
 sea it is exposed to every daring invader; and on the northwest 
 you are open to the inroads of a powerful foreign nation. Indeed 
 this state, from its situation, will, in time of war, probably be 
 the theatre of its operations. 
 
 Gentlemen have said that the noneomxDliance of the states has 
 been occasioned by their sufferings. That may in part be true. 
 But has this state been delinquent? Amidst all our distresses, 
 u-e have fully complied. If New York could wholly comply with 
 the requisitions, is it not to be supposed that the other' states 
 could in part comply ? Certainly every state in the I'nion might 
 have executed them in the same degree. But New Hampshire, 
 who has not suffered at -all, is totally delinquent. North Carolina 
 is totally delinquent. Many others have contributed in very 
 small proportion; Pennsylvania and New York are the only 
 states which have perfectly discharged their federal duty. 
 
 From the delinquency of those states which have suffered little 
 by the war, we naturally conclude that they have made no 
 efforts ; and a knowledge of human nature will teach us that their 
 ease and security have been the principal cause of their want of 
 exertion. While danger is distant its impression is weak, and 
 wiiile it aff'ects only our neighbors, we have few motives to pro- 
 vide against it. Sir, if we have national objects to pursue, we 
 must have national revenues. If you make, requisitions and they 
 are not complied with, what is to be done? It has been well 
 observed that to coerce the state is one of the maddest projects 
 that was ever devised. A failure of compliance will never be con- 
 fined to a single state ; this being the case, can we suppose it to 
 be wise to hazard a civil war? Suppose IMassachusetts or any 
 other large state should refuse, and Congress should attempt to 
 compel them; would they not have influence to procure assist- 
 ance, especially from those states who are in the same .situation 
 as themselves.? What a picture does this idea present to our 
 view! A complying state at war with a noncomplying state; 
 Congress niarching the troops ol' one state into the bosom of 
 another; this state collecting auxiliaries and forming perha])s a 
 ma^iority against its federal head. Here is a nation at war willi 
 itself! A government that can exist only by the sword! Every 
 such war must involve the innocent with the gnilty. This .single 
 cojisideration should be snfTicient to dispose every peaceable citi- 
 zen against sucli a government. 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 419 
 
 But can we believe that any state will ever suffer itself to be 
 used as an instrument of coercion against another? It is a 
 dream; it is impossible. AVe are brought to this dilemma: either 
 a federal standing army is to enforce the requisitions, or the fed- 
 eral Treasury is left without supplies, and the government with- 
 out support. What is the cure for this great evil ? Nothing, but 
 to enable the national laws to operate on individuals in the same 
 manner as those of the state do. 
 
 What shall we do ? Shall we take the old Confederation as the 
 basis of the new system ? Can this be the object of gentlemen ? 
 Certainly not. Will any man who entertains a wish for the 
 safety of his country trust the sword and the purse to a single 
 Assembly, organized on principles so defective? Though we 
 might give to such a government certain powers with safety, yet 
 to give them the full and unlimited powers of taxation and the 
 national forces, would be to establish a despotism, the definition 
 of which is, a government in which all power is concentrated in 
 a single body. To take the old Confederation and fashion it upon 
 these principles would be establishing a power which would 
 destroy the liberties of the people. These considerations show 
 clearly that a government totally different must be instituted. 
 They had weight in the Convention which formed the new sys- 
 tem. It was seen that the necessary powers were too great to 
 be trusted to a single body ; they therefore formed two branches 
 and divided the powers, that each might be a check upon the 
 other. This was the result of their wisdom ; and I presume that 
 every reasonable man will agree with it. The more this subject 
 is explained, the more clear and convincing it will appear to 
 every member of this bod.y. The fundamental principle of the 
 old Confederation is defective. We must totally eradicate and 
 discard this principle before we can expect an efficient gov- 
 ernment. 
 
 This was one of a series of Hamilton's addresses which 
 secured the adoption of the Constitution by the New 
 York Convention. When the first test came, the dele- 
 gates stood forty-six to nineteen against ratification; 
 after Hamilton's efforts the Constitution was adopted by 
 a majority of three votes. Observe the following features 
 of this piece of floor eloquence : 
 
 1. Hamilton conserves all the ground gained by his 
 colleagues by means of terse summary and favorable 
 recapitulation (paragraph ]). 
 
120 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 2. He nullifies the work of the opponents without giv- 
 ing- offense (paragTapli 1, middle). 
 
 o. He brings the question clearly before the conven- 
 tion in a frank and unbiased manner (paragraph 1, the 
 end). 
 
 4. He brings up the issue of New York standing alone 
 (paragraph 2). 
 
 This is a good beginning with the particnhir audience 
 addressed. 
 
 5. He expresses confidence in the judgment of the 
 body if only it Avill pi'operly consider the matter at hand 
 (paragraph 3). 
 
 6. His arguments in the remaining paragraphs are 
 clear, and each i^oint is supported by reference to what 
 actually took place. He is careful to draw illustrations 
 to the credit of New York. He does not assail the state ; 
 he assails only the old system. 
 
 7. He concludes with a strong summary and appeal 
 for the now inevitable new system which he advocates. 
 
 The kind of argument which he used is excellent when- 
 ever one is to advocate a change or reform. First show, 
 that the old is faulty or inaxlequate; then that a remedy 
 is essential; and then that the proposed remedy over- 
 comes the old defects and has none of its own. If the 
 attack on the old can be so managed as to make the new 
 the inevitable kind of reform, the speech is likely to be 
 successful. 
 
 Speeches from the floor of a convention or general 
 meeting should be dignified Imt not ponderous, keen but 
 not acrimonious, dealing in principles and not personali- 
 ties. The student will do well to go over this speech by 
 Hamilton many times with these general ideals in mind. 
 Perhaps a careful not(>book summary ml,i.dit be wortli 
 while. This might inchide (1) ]K)ints mentioned above, 
 (2) an analysi>< of the audience, and (;>) a statement 
 of the conditions of the speech as the occasion and the 
 purpose. 
 
SPECIAL OC(L\SIOXS 421 
 
 Refutation 
 
 Before leaving convention methods, we may speak of 
 tlie attention which one should pay to the arguments of 
 an opponent and the form of refutation in reply. One 
 of th€ greatest parliamentary speakers the world has 
 known was Charles James Fox, the English statesman. 
 It is said that he could listen to an address by a member 
 of the other side and retain perfectly every point made. 
 His pet ruse in debate was to restate his opponent's argu- 
 ments in better form and clearer arrangement than the 
 original presentation; then when they were before the 
 house in their greatest weight, he would proceed to tear 
 them to pieces. To approach such a performance should 
 be the aim of every speaker who wishes to break a lance 
 in convention or cross swords in deliberative bodies. The 
 accomplishment is useful not only in large gatherings but 
 also in committees and small groups such as arbitration 
 boards and boards of trustees. 
 
 How shall the speaker school himself to grasp • and 
 retain the case presented by his antagonist in all its 
 details? We suggest that he make a practice, in the 
 beginning, of taking analytical notes, using the regular 
 blank form of brief described in Lesson 15. For instance, 
 you have before you a sheet of paper ruled with a broad 
 column to the left for opinions or inferences, another 
 broad column in the center for facts, and a narrow column 
 to the right for sources. If the opponent advances an 
 opinion, note it in the first column. If he supports it by 
 minor ideas, note them, properly indented, under the 
 first. If he gives facts for support, put them down in 
 the proper place, and so on until you build up a com- 
 plete brief of his speech as he proceeds. A little practice 
 will give you great skill in terse expression and in select- 
 ing the heart of the message and separating it from the 
 amplification. Keep this style of note-taking up for a 
 
4L>2 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 while and you will soon be able to make a mental brief 
 and retain the essential matter. 
 
 If you intend to say something in refutation, it is well 
 to restate the opponent's case clearly at the outset. This 
 brings it once more before the audience and gives point 
 to your reply. When refuting, it is well to have a 
 systematic plan of attack. The following is offered as a 
 general mode, portions to be used according to the situa- 
 tion faced. Of course the language will be modified. 
 
 1. Even if the two reasons given by Mr. A — were con- 
 ceded to be true, it would not necessarily follow that his 
 conclusion to etc. — Avould be accepted; because 
 
 2. We^ cannot accept Mr. A's conclusion because we 
 do not accept his premises or reasons. The first, namely, 
 
 , etc., cannot be accepted because ; and 
 
 so on. 
 
 3. We cannot agree with Mr. A's opinion because no 
 reason has been advanced to support it. Then either 
 demand further support or bring forth your own facts 
 and arguments to destroy the original assertion's 
 validity. 
 
 If you have briefed the other man's address, you are 
 in possession of a logical war map and know precisely 
 wiiere the vulnerable spots are, w^aiting for your attack. 
 
 Sometimes it is advisable to evade or let pass what an 
 opponent says and simply try to offset the genera] 
 impression made. In such a case, simply keep your larger 
 object in view and work toward it. 
 
 In all discussions, observe parliamentary courtesy. Do 
 not refer to an opponent as "he," but rather, "Mr. So 
 and So," or "The gentlemen who just spoke," or some 
 such phrase. Even harsh criticism should be impersonal 
 and be couched in parliamentary language. We quote a 
 famous ])a) Tmmcntai-y retort to an unparliamentary 
 atlack. 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 423 
 
 Henry Grattan's Reply to Mr. Corry in the Irish 
 Parliament, 1800 
 
 Has the gentleman done ; has he completely done ? He was 
 unparliamentary from the beginning to the end of his speech. 
 There was scarce a word he uttered that was not a violation of 
 the privileges of the house. But I did not call him to order. 
 Why ? Because the limited talents of some men render it impos- 
 sible for them to be severe without becoming unparliamentary. 
 But before I sit down. I shall show^ him how to be severe and 
 parliamentary at the same time. 
 
 On any other occasion I should think myself justified in treat- 
 ing with silent contempt anything which might fall from the lips 
 of that honorable member. But there are times when the insig- 
 nificance of the accuser is lost in the magnitude of the accusa- 
 tion. I know the difficulty the honorable gentleman labored 
 under when he attacked me, conscious that, on a comparative 
 view of our characters, public and private, there is nothing he 
 could say Avhich would injure me. The public would not believe 
 the charge. I despise the falsehood. If such a charge were made 
 by an honest man, I would answer it in the manner I shall use 
 before I sit down. But I shall first reply to it, when not made by 
 an honest man. 
 
 The right honorable gentleman has called me "an unimpeached 
 traitor." I ask why not "traitor," imqualified by an epithet. 
 I will tell him ; it was because he durst not. It was the act of a 
 coward who raises his arm to strike but has not the courage to 
 give the blow. I will not call him villain, because it would be 
 unparliamentary, and he is a privy counselor. I will not call 
 him fool, because he happens to be Chancellor of the Exchequer. 
 But I say he is one who abused the privilege of Parliament, and 
 freedom of debate, by uttering language which, if spoken out of 
 the House, I should answer only with a blow. I care not how 
 high his situation, how low his character, how contemptible his 
 speech ; whether a privy counselor or a parasite — my answer 
 would be a blow. 
 
 He has charged me with being connected with the rebels. The 
 charge is utterly, totally, and meanly false. Does the honorable 
 gentleman rely on the report of the Plouse of Lords for the 
 foundation for his assertion? If he does, I can prove to the 
 committee that there was a phj'sical impossibility of that report 
 l)eing true. But I scorn to answer any man for my conduct, 
 whether he be a political coxcomb, or whether he brought himself 
 into power by a false glare of courage or not. 
 
 I have returned, — not, as the right honorable member has said, 
 to raise another storm, — I liave returned to discharge an honor- 
 
424 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 able debt of gratitude to my country that conferred a great 
 reward for past services, which, I am proud to say, Avas not 
 greater than my desert. I have returned to protect that Consti- 
 tution of Mhieh I was the parent and founder, from the assassi- 
 nation of such men as the right honorable gentleman and his 
 unworthy associates. They are corrupt, they are seditious, and 
 they at this very moment are in a conspiracy against their coun- 
 try, I have returned to refute a libel as false as it is malicious, 
 given to the public under the appellation of a report of the com- 
 mittee of the Lords. Here I stand ready for impeachment or 
 trial. I dare accusation. I defy the honorable gentleman ; I 
 defy the government ; I defy their whole phalanx ; let them 
 come forth. I tell the ministers, I will neither give quarter nor 
 take it. I am here to lay the shattered remains of my constitu- 
 tion on the floor of this House, in defence of the liberties of my 
 country. 
 
 Of course, provocation must go pretty far before a 
 speech such as the one just given should be uttered. Yet 
 there are times, in political gatherings especially, when 
 just that thing is needed. A few years ago, Senator 
 McCarren of Brooklyn made a bitter attack on Charles 
 F. Murphy, Leader of Tammany Hall, in the Democratic 
 Convention. All remember some of the bitter speeches 
 delivered in the Republican Convention of 1912, held in 
 Chicago, which resulted in Roosevelt's withdrawal from 
 the party. It is Avhen such occasions arise that the 
 student will profit by the example just offered for study. 
 
 No branch of public speaking is more interesting than 
 the convention and legislative field. The student should 
 perfect himself in the methods — equip himself for such 
 frays. To succeed here one must be well-informed, quiclv: 
 of analysis, ready in speech, and fearless of heart. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 'I 111- writli'ii exercises in tliis entire lesson slioiild 1)0 
 ciUetuliy wurkeil out. Keep eopies of tile written e\er- 
 eises in yuiir notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read the lesson tlirough at least Iwirc. Tlicn answer 
 the test questions. 
 
SPECIAL OCXWSIOXS , 425 
 
 Second Day. — Outline and deliver a short announcement si)eeoh 
 for one of the following oeeasions: 
 
 1. fleeting to organize the workmen in an unorganized 
 branch of industry. 
 
 2. Meeting of citizens to agitate for local option in li(|uor 
 matters. 
 
 3. IMeeting to organize a social club or some society for 
 a special i)urpose. 
 
 Third Bay. — Plan fully and then write out a" key-note speecli" 
 for a convention of any sort you may select. 
 
 Fouvtli Bay. — Make an analytical brief of the Hamilton speech. 
 
 Fifth Bay. — Plan and write a complete rebuttal of the Hamilton 
 speech. If you wish to analyze and refute some other speech 
 of which you have a copy, that will do just as well. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 Theso questions arc for tlie student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are siKjfiestire merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. Name four kinds of speeches wliieli might reasonably bo 
 (•..})eeted during the organization and conduct of a convention. 
 
 2. What are the essential features of the explanatory address 
 of one who calls a meeting to take up some new matter ? 
 
 3. What is meant by "steam-roller tactics"? What do you 
 tliink of such tactics? 
 
 ■1. Give the essential features of a typical ' ' key-note speech. ' ' 
 
 5. How could the one given be improved ? Has it any glar- 
 ing faults of style, or is the style goocl and clear? 
 
 6. Give the order of business of a convention or organizing 
 meeting. 
 
 7. What do ,you think of Hamilton's style? How does it 
 compare with that of Patrick Henry? Which man shows the 
 greater intellectual force? If either were to be accused of being 
 a demagogue, which would be so designated tirst? 
 
 8. What should be the characteristics of a speech from the 
 floor of a convention ? 
 
 9. What is the ideal equipment and method of one who 
 would enter floor debate ? 
 
 10. What relation does a brief bear to the analytical notes 
 of an opponent's address? 
 
 11. Can you give a good systematic scheme of refutation? 
 
 12. What was said about parliamentary courtesy ? Have you 
 ever heard a speaker who lost ground simply because of his lack 
 of courtesy ? 
 
 13. How do you like the style of Grattan's speech? Would 
 you call it weighty or brilliant? 
 
 14. Is his own speech in good taste throughout? What parts 
 sound too egotistic? How could the speech have been improved 
 
 wilhoiil sacrificing llic biting effectiveness? 
 
 426 
 
LESSON 24 
 
 PRACTICAL SPEECH DIRECTIONS (Continued) 
 
 The Chairman of Occasion 
 
 Often there are speech occasions when many addresses 
 are made and a chairman presides over all. We have in 
 mind dedicatory services, the laying of corner stones, 
 commemorative gatherings, commencement exercises, 
 and, above all, banquets. Of first interest are the duties of 
 the chairman, or, as he is called at dinners, the toast- 
 master. He is master of ceremonies ; he must preserve the 
 tone of the meeting and see that the program is carried 
 out smoothly. His speaking consists of an address at the 
 ix'ginning, short introductions to the other speeches, and 
 sometimes comments at their conclusion. 
 
 Opening Address 
 
 The opening talk by the chairman or address of wel- 
 come should as a rule be very brief. There are, to be 
 sure, times when this introductory address has impor- 
 tance in itself, either because of a stand to be taken by 
 the presiding officer or because of some special feature 
 of the occasion which gives him and his message peculiar 
 weight. But when he is simply the master of ceremonies, 
 his address is merely introductory and should in no way 
 compete with the set speeches. The following are sug- 
 gested as proper, typical features for such an address. 
 
 1. It should set the tone of the gathering. If the 
 occasion is a solemn one, the speech should give that tone; 
 
 427 
 
428 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 if it be convivial, tlie speech slioukl be jovial; if it be a 
 l)i-isk business meeting, the speech may be snappy. 
 
 2. It may refer to (a) the general purpose of the 
 organization, (b) the special reason for the gathering, 
 (c) the personal attitude of the speaker himself to either 
 of these or some special i^hase. This last, however, must 
 be indulged in sparingly and with entire good taste. 
 
 3. It may welcome those present explicitly or implic- 
 itly to participate appropriately in the ceremonies. 
 
 4. It should launch the meeting by introducing the 
 first speaker or by ushering in Avhatever else the program 
 calls for first. 
 
 At the connnemorative services conducted by the Sen- 
 ators and Representatives of Massachusetts in honor of 
 Charles Sumner, the following introductory address was 
 given by the Honorable Alexander H. Bullock : 
 
 In the train of those paying mournful tribute to Charles 
 Sumner, most fit is the presence of the Legishiture of ]\Iassa- 
 chusetts. By their act, twenty-four years ago, the gate was 
 opened through which he passed to the Senate of the United 
 States for life. And now, after this lapse of time and the close 
 of his career, the Government and the people of this Common- 
 wealth contemplate with just and solemn satisfaction the con- 
 tribution they then made to the higher sphere of statesmanship. 
 They recall his first appearance there, seemingly lost amidst a 
 majority who were tlie emliodiment and type of ideals so mucli 
 less heroic and elevated than his own ; with what masterly 
 unreserve he began and continued his great mission, disguising 
 nothing, sweeping in his perspective many of the vast results 
 which have .since been attained ; how he lived to see his grand 
 central aspirations realized, his main purposes accomplished, at 
 his death leaving as a truth, never before so well illustrated at 
 the Capital, that the character of statesman and senator derives 
 added strengtli and lustre from tlie character of scholar and 
 philanthropist, liberator and reformer. 
 
 At the moment of the greatest triumph of Wilberfoi'ce, on 
 the passage of his bill al)olishing the slave trade, Sir Samuel 
 Romilly, amid the ringing acclamations of the House of Com- 
 mons, called upon the younger members to observe how superioi- 
 were the rewards of virtue to all the vulgar conceptions of 
 ambition. In the houi- of the greatest triumph of Sunnier — the 
 
THE CIIAIRIMAN OF OCCASION 429 
 
 hour of his deatli — ;i like culnionition arose from his vacant chair, 
 calling" upon American i)ublic life to mark the lofty exemplar, 
 l)y whom, amid abounding corruption, comparative poverty had 
 been held as honor; to whom artifice and intrigue had been an 
 abhorrence; w^ho, in the long practice of official transactions and 
 official manners, had never acquired an official heart ; who had 
 guarded his conscience against every assault, and always kept 
 that vessel pure ; upon whose headstone the whole Republic 
 inscribes for its souvenauee, "Incorruptible and Unapproach- 
 able." 
 
 With one mind the Senators and Representatives of INIassa- 
 chusetts, successors to those who, nearly a quarter of a century 
 since, sent him forth with the seal of his great commission, are 
 present by these fine and august ceremonies to deliver him over 
 to history. In selecting their orator for this tender office, they 
 could not fail to call for him who best would give voice to their 
 eulogy. As our lamented Senator was a master in all the art 
 of letters, it is fitting that he should be embalmed by the art of 
 another and similar master and personal friend. I introduce to 
 you Mr. George William Curtis. 
 
 Study this example carefully and notice the way the 
 tone of the meeting is established. Observe how fitting 
 the ideas are to the occasion. Also note the adaptation 
 to the special audience, as well as the appropriate intro- 
 duction of him who was to make the long eulogistic 
 oration. 
 
 The opening speech of a toastmaster at a dinner con- 
 forms to the plan just described for general occasions. 
 But of all opening speeches, it should be — in most cases — 
 the shortest. Obviously the toastmaster has the guests 
 at his mercy and he can do as he pleases. Too often we 
 fear he takes advantage of his position, bores the diners 
 and irritates the speakers who are to follow. A long- 
 winded toastmaster is insufferable. 
 
 The introduction of each speaker, by the toastmaster, 
 should be short and it should tend to make the audience 
 eager to hear the man introduced. Here it is appropriate 
 to refer appreciatively to (1) some general trait of the 
 speaker, of a distinguishing character, (2) some particu- 
 lar attainment, or (3) the value and interest of wdiat he 
 
430 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 lias to say. Often these things are conveyed by means 
 of an anecdote, story, or fable. Observe how the refer- 
 ence was made in the introduction of George AVilliani 
 Curtis, at the end of the last example. 
 
 The following is an introduction that was used at a 
 dinner of a department of a large corporation: 
 
 Gentlemen, somewhere in Greek mythology, we read of an 
 individual who carried a new-born calf to the barn. And every 
 day, he made it a practice to lift the calf, always managing to 
 hold up the gradually increasing weight. The strength of the 
 lifter grew with the calf's growth, and when it was a full grown 
 bull, the master could raise it clear off the ground. Five j^ears 
 ago our contract department was born and it was lifted and 
 carried by one man. Now it is the largest of its kind in the 
 state ; Mr. Brown, the manager, w'ill speak to us and possibly give 
 the secret of strength which enables him to conduct so effieiently 
 and alone the work which had its small beginnings under his 
 care : JMr. Brown. 
 
 The complimentary introduction should not be too ful- 
 some in its praise and gratifying reference ; to exceed the 
 bounds of good taste gives evidence here of insincerity. 
 Extravagant and insincere praise before others partakes 
 of the nature of an insulting imposition ; it is as though 
 the toastmaster were having fun at the expense of his 
 speaker. This remark applies also to the comment whicli 
 the toastmaster sometimes makes at the conclusion of an 
 address. 
 
 After-Dinner Speech 
 
 The dinner speech projjer now receives our attention. 
 It is an established feature of civilized life and all speak- 
 ers should acquire some facility in this form of address. 
 The occasion is a convivial one, though not necessarily 
 frivolous. The whole tone is one of tolerance and good 
 nature. If a speaker has some vigorous contention to 
 make, the dinner, as a rule, is not the place to nudve it. 
 
THE CHAIRMAN OF OCCASION 431 
 
 The speeches sliould be addresses calculated to cliarm and 
 give i^leasure. 
 
 This i^leasure may ])e of the intellectual sort which 
 comes I'rom hearing a lofty theme treated in a sympa- 
 thetic and artistic manner. It may be rollicking good 
 humor or it may be (luiet fun through an appreciation 
 of a dry but kindly criticism of life. But whatever it is, 
 it has no element of contention. It is customary for a 
 speaker at such a dinner to ascertain beforehand just 
 the sort of people he is to address and who the other 
 speakers will be. If among the other speakers there is 
 one with whom he has a difference, that difference must 
 not be aired, save in good-natured, genuine poking of fun 
 at himself as well as his adversary. It is better to decline 
 an invitation to speak after dinner than to use the occa- 
 sion as a means of getting at some one else present or 
 absent. 
 
 After settling the question of audience and other 
 speakers, the candidate for post-prandial honors will con- 
 sider his subject and manner of treatment. He will not 
 attempt to demonstrate anything rigorously by force of 
 argument. Neither will he make a strenuous appeal, 
 unless the dinner occasion is to be changed from its social 
 purpose to some other. Rather will he select some topic 
 of interest and treat it in a broad, human, genial way. 
 The treatment should be expansive rather than intensive. 
 
 The matter used, therefore, is more of the general, cul- 
 tural sort than the special, rigorous message. As in all 
 speeches, there should be a central theme and unity of 
 treatment, but the attraction of the speech is not so much 
 the driving home of the theme in itself ais the graceful 
 development of it by reference to a wide and rich field. 
 Such speeches reveal the speaker's general attitude 
 toward life, for in ornamenting his central theme, he 
 draws upon the things nearest his heart and most pleasing 
 to his taste. While revolving his thoughts before those 
 
482 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 present in a tolerant, free spirit, he indeed reveals 
 himself. ' 
 
 Note the tone of John Hay's address before the Omar 
 Khavyam Clnb of l.ondon. 
 
 Omar Khayyam 
 
 I cannot sufficiently thank yon for the high and unmerited 
 honor you have done me tonight. I feel keenly that on such an 
 occasion, with such company, my place is below the salt ; but 
 as you kindly invited me, it was not in human nature for me 
 to refuse. 
 
 Although in knowledge and comprehension of the two great 
 poets whom you are met to commemorate I am the least among 
 you. there is no one who regards them with greater admiration, 
 or reads them with more enjoyment, than myself. I can never 
 forget my emotions when I first saw FitzGerald's translati(ms of 
 the Quatrains. Keats, in his sublime "ode on Chapman's Homer, 
 has described the sensation once for all: 
 
 Then felt I like some watcher of the skies. 
 When a new planet swims into his ken. 
 
 The excjuisite beauty, the faultless form, the singular grace of 
 those amazing stanzas Avere not more wonderful than the depth 
 and breadth of their profound philosophy, their knowledge ol' 
 life, their dauntless courage, their serene facing of the ulti- 
 mate problems of life and of death. Of course the doubt did 
 not spare me, which has assailed many as ignorant as I wa • 
 of the literature of the East, whether it was the poet or hi^ 
 translator to whom was due this splendid result. Was it, in 
 fact, a reproduction of an antique song, or a mystification of a 
 great modern, careless of fame and scornful of his time? Could 
 it be possible that in the eleventh century, so far away as Khoras- 
 san, so accomplished a man of letters lived, with such distinction, 
 such breadth, such insight, such calm disillusion, such cheerful 
 and jocund despair! Was this Weltschmerz, which we thought 
 a malady of our day, endemic in Persia in 1100? ]\Iy doubt onlv 
 lasted till I came upon a literal translation of the Rubaiyat, and 
 I saw that not the least remarkable quality of FitzGerald's poem 
 was its fidelity to the original. In short, Omar was a Fitz- 
 Gerald hrfore the Idler, or FitzGerald was a reincarnation of 
 Omar. 
 
 It is not to the disadvantage of the later poet that he followed 
 so closely in the footsteps of the earlier. A man of extraordinary 
 genms'had appeared in the world; had sung a song of incom- 
 
THE CHAIRMAN OF OCCASION 433 
 
 I)arable beauty and power in an environment no longer worthy 
 of him, in a language of narrow range; for many generations 
 the song was virtually lost; then by a miracle of creation, a poet, 
 twin-brother in the spirit to the tirst, was born, who took up the 
 forgotten poem and sang it anew with all its original melody 
 and force, and with all the accumulated retinement of ages 
 of art. It seems to me idle to ask which was the greater master; 
 each seems greater than his work. The song is like an instrument 
 of precious workmanship and marvelous tone, which is worth- 
 less in common hands, but when it falls, at long intervals, into 
 the hands of the supreme master, it yields a melody of tran- 
 scendent enchantment to all that have ears to hear. 
 
 If we look at the sphere of influence of the two poets, there 
 is no longer any comparison. Omar sang to a half-barbarous 
 province: FitzGerald to the world. AVherever the English 
 speech is spoken or read, the Rubaiyat have taken their place as 
 a classic. There is not a hill-post in India, nor a village in 
 England, where there is not a coterie to whom Omar Khayyam 
 is a familiar friend and a bond of miion. In America he has 
 an equal following, in many regi(ms and conditions. In the 
 p]astern States his adepts form an esoteric set ; the beautiful 
 volume of drawings by Mr. Vedder is a center of delight and 
 suggestion wherever it exists. In the cities of the West you 
 will find the (Quatrains one of the most thoroughly read books 
 in every club library. I heard them cjuoted once in one of 
 the most lonely and desolate spots of the high Rockies. We 
 had been camping on the Great Divide, our "roof of the M-orld," 
 where, in the space of a few feet you may see two springs, one 
 sending its waters to the Polar solitudes, the other to the eternal 
 Carib summer. One morning at sunrise, as we were breaking 
 camp, I was startled to hear one of our party, a frontiersman 
 born, intoning these words of somber majesty : 
 
 'Tis but a tent where takes his one day's rest 
 A Sultan to the realm of death addrest ; • 
 The Sultan rises, and the dark Ferrash 
 Strikes and prepares it for another guest. 
 
 I thought that sublime setting of primeval forest and frowninjj^ 
 canon was worthy of the lines ; I am sure the dewless, crystalline 
 air never vibrated to strains of more solemn music. 
 
 Certainly, our poet can never be numbered among the great 
 popular writers of all time. He has told no story ; he has never 
 unpacked his heart in public ; he has never thrown the reins on 
 the neck uf the winged horse, and let his imagination carry him 
 where it listed. "Oh! the crowd must have emphatic warrant," 
 as Browning sang. Its suffrages are not for tlie cool, collected 
 
434 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 observer, whose eyes no glitter ean dazzle, no mist suffuse. The 
 many cannot but resent that air of lofty intelligence, that pale 
 and subtle smile. But he Avill hold place forever among that 
 limited number who, like Lucretius and Epicurus, — without 
 rage or defiance, even without unbecoming mirth, — look deep 
 into the tangled mysteries of things; refuse credence to the 
 absurd, and allegiance to arrogant authority ; sufficiently con- 
 scious of fallibility to be tolerant of all opinions ; with a faith 
 too wide for doctrine and a benevolence untrammeled by creed, 
 too wise to be wholly poets, and yet too surely poets to be 
 implacably wise.^ 
 
 Observations : 
 
 1. The theme is obviously most appropriate. 
 
 2. The tone and contents are perfectly adapted to the 
 audience. 
 
 3. The style is polished, yet genial and contemplative 
 as naturally befitted a cultivated gentleman addressing 
 bis equals at dinner. 
 
 4. The speech is short. 
 
 Besides these specific things to be noted, one feels a 
 general, sincere urbanity, as he catches a glimpse of a 
 literary man of no mean attainments, delighting his 
 hearers and himself with his reflections on a beloved topic. 
 Even with change of topics, something of this feeling, 
 in varying degrees, should go with all after-dinner 
 speeches. 
 
 To show how this is evidenced in more humorous 
 speeches, we give the following extemporaneous address 
 made by John Hay on Thanksgiving Day, 1865, in Paris, 
 when he was Secretary of Legation. It is one of his very 
 first addresses. 
 
 OlK COTTNTRVWOMEN 
 
 My Countrymen — and I would say my countrywomen, but 
 that the former word embraces the latter whenever opportunity 
 offers — I cannot understand why I should have been called upon 
 to respond to this toast of all others, having nothing but theoret- 
 
 ' Tlio Hay speeches are froiii Addicss by .luhn llaii ((VMiturv Co.. 1006). 
 
THE CIIAIKMAX OF OCCASIOX 435 
 
 ical ideas upon the sul)jeet to be treated — one, iii fact, 1 must 
 l)e ])resuined never to have handled. (Laughter and ai)plause.) 
 1 have been called up, too, by a committee of married men. I 
 can think of no claim I have to be considered an authority in 
 these matters, except what might arise from the fact of my 
 having resided in early life in the same neighborhood with 
 Hrigham Young, who has since gained some reputation as a 
 thorough and practical ladies' man. (Great laughter.) I am 
 not conscious, however, of having imbibed any such wisdom at 
 the feet of this matrimonial Gamaliel as should justly entitle me 
 to be heard among the elders. 
 
 8o I am inevitably forced to the conclusion that these hus- 
 bands cannot trust each other's discretion. The secrets of the 
 prison-house are too important to be trusted to one of the 
 prisoners. So ignorance of the matter in hand has come to be 
 held an absolute prerequisite when anyone is to be sacrificed to 
 the exigencies of this toast. 
 
 I really do not see why this should be so. It is useless for hus- 
 bands to attempt to keep this thin veneering of a semblance of 
 authority. The symbols of government they still retain deceive 
 nobody. They may comfort themselves with the assurance of 
 some vague invisible supremacy, like that of the spiritual JMikado 
 or the Grand Llama, but the true Tycoon is the wife. A witty 
 and profound observer the other day said: "Every husband 
 doubtless knows he is' master in his own house, but he also knows 
 his neighbor's wife is master in hers." (Laughter and cheers.) 
 
 Why should not you, husbands of America, admit this great 
 truth and give up the barren scepter? Things would go much 
 easier if you ceased the struggle to keep up appearances. The 
 ladies will not be hard on you. They will recognize the fact 
 that, after all, you are their fellow-creatures, and you can be 
 very useful to them in many little ways. They will doubtless 
 allow you to pay their bills, take care of their children, and carry 
 their votes to the ballot-box just as you do now. 
 
 You had better come down gracefully, and above all, let no 
 feeling of discovered inferiority betray you in evil speaking of 
 the domestic powers. There have been recent instances of dis- 
 tinguished gentlemen, no doubt instigated by rebellious husbands, 
 who have recklessly accused these guardian angels of your fire- 
 sides of being extravagant and frivolous. These things are never 
 uttered with impunity. I would not in.sure the life of one who 
 libels the ladies for less than cent per cent. 
 
 ' ' Discite justitiam moniti et non temnere Divas ! ' ' which, as 
 you may not understand the backwoods pronunciation of the 
 classic warning, I will translate with a freedom befitting the 
 dav we celebrate ; 
 
436 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 ."Now. all you happy husbands. 
 Beware the rebel's fate! 
 Live in obedience all your lives. 
 Give up 3^our latch-keys to your wives, 
 And never stay out late." 
 
 The humorous after-dinner speech should never descend 
 to buffoonery, nor should the fun be of an undesirable 
 sort. Now and then, at stag dinners, someone drops to 
 the level of '' off-color" stories. Never do this yourself; 
 it is a most undesirable habit to start. Even if such 
 entertainment does not offend those who listen, a stamp 
 and character is given to the mind of the speaker which 
 is detrimental to success in the worth-while fields. 
 
 This reminds us of one of the services of the toast- 
 master. If one of the speakers should make a faux pas 
 in the use of an undesirable story, or if one should say 
 something offensive in sentiment, belief, or prejudice to 
 some of those present, the master of ceremonies, at the 
 end of the speech, by tactful comment; indicates that the 
 sentiment of the gathering as a whole is not in the 
 offensive direction. This he must do, if he does it at all, 
 with the best of good-humor and without hurting either 
 the culprit or the others present. It is his place, when 
 a jarring note is struck, to restore the harmony of the 
 gathering. Of course it is wisest sometimes to let a slip 
 pass without comment of any sort. If a speaker is dull 
 and the guests become restless, it is for the toastmaster 
 to save the day by a bright sally or story. If things 
 become too hilarious, it is he who will sober matters down 
 to the plane of dignified fun. 
 
 -Some men think that the after-dinner speech is a sort 
 of vaudeville monologue made up of a series of jokes 
 loosely hung together. That is one of the cheapest kinds 
 of speech. In fact it is no speech at all, for it does not 
 reveal the speaker to the audience. It reflects no per- 
 sonality save one's taste in jokes; it lacks originality 
 
 i 
 
THE CIIATR:\rAX OF OCCASION 437 
 
 and has nothing- of communication whatsoever in it. A 
 l)lionogTaph could render this sort of entertainment 
 ahnost as well as the speaker, and a paid performer could 
 do better. A short story or joke now and then in the 
 after-dinner speech, on the other hand, is welcomed by 
 the audience. If the audience be at all discriminating, 
 the welcome will be in proportion to the appropriateness 
 of the joke in connection with a real point to be brought 
 forth. Do not drag jokes in by the hair of the head. 
 
 Also have mercy on your audience and refrain from 
 the frequent use of hackneyed quotations and scraps of 
 doggerel rhyme. It is very boring to hear one reel off 
 a lot of sentiments and quotations dug out of some com- 
 pilation. The three besetting sins of the after-dinner 
 speaker of the common variety are : 
 
 1. The old jokes; 
 
 2. The hackneyed quotations; 
 
 3. Eambling lack of unity and real theme. 
 
 Summary of Advice for After-Dixxer Speaking 
 
 1. Learn all you can about the audience, 
 
 2. Find out who else will speak. 
 
 3. Make your speech short, especially if many others 
 are to talk. 
 
 4. Make it of a character, in matter, that will not only 
 offend no one present but will really please all. This 
 means that you must choose a topic in harmony with the 
 occasion and those present. 
 
 5. Select a topic in harmony with your own tastes 
 and knowledge. If it is assigned to you, treat it so as to 
 conform with wdiat has been said. 
 
 6. Let your treatment be genial rather than impetu- 
 ous, expansive rather than intense. 
 
 7. Have it well prepared and planned. Do not 
 ramble. 
 
438 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 8. Avoid the old jokes and those dragged in. 
 1). Avoid the hackneyed quotation. 
 10. Finally be your best self, enjoying yourself among 
 friends, on a high level of intellectual pleasure. 
 
 Vocational Talks 
 
 In all the branches of business activity, from the man- 
 aging of a great city down to the smaller departments of 
 commercial companies, the value of the conference is 
 being recognized. In the old days, the head of the estab- 
 lishment issued his orders, and those under his authority 
 carried them out as well as their understanding of them 
 would permit. But it is a growing custom for chiefs to 
 make short addresses to those working with them, out- 
 lining problems and seeking the combined wisdom of all 
 as the basis of their solution. These gatherings give even 
 those in the lower ranks a broad outlook so that each can 
 see his individual task in its i^roper place in a great work- 
 ing organization. Through them, the worker is made to 
 feel that he is not merely a mechanical part but also a 
 thinking part of the grand scheme. At the conferences, 
 it is customary for the chief, or someone designated by 
 him because of superior experience or knowledge in a 
 given branch, to make an address and with that as the 
 starting point have discussions of mutual benefit to all 
 participating and especially to the firm. It is difficult to 
 get good samples of this sort of address, for they are not 
 preserved. Furthermore, what would be appropriate for 
 one branch of work would be of no interest to others. It 
 therefore seems best to offer a typical outline rather than 
 a particular speech. 
 
 A — Prerequisites for Success: 
 
 1. Tlie general ones necessary for all success in 
 speaking. 
 
THE CIIAIRMAX OF OCCASION 439 
 
 2. Intimacy of tone and physical closeness. Gather 
 the men around as friends ; do not spread them out in a 
 great room to listen to a formal address. The closer they 
 can be grouped together as in a social gathering, the 
 better. 
 
 3. Thorough democracy in the conduct of the meet- 
 ing. This is not incompatible with the recognition of 
 authority arising from position or superior knowledge, 
 but it is incompatible with the obtrusion of distinctions 
 in rank. All the men of various ranks come together for 
 mutual help. 
 
 4. Most careful preparation and planning of the talk 
 and the points to be brought out in the discussion. This 
 is necessary to prevent the conference from becoming a 
 mere chat. 
 
 B — Typical Outline: 
 
 1. Introduction to establish tone of pleasantness and 
 to arouse interest. 
 
 2. Statement of the problem. 
 
 (a) Defects of an old system under consideration 
 for modification. 
 
 (b) Proposed system with its advantages and pos- 
 sible disadvantages. 
 
 3. Effect of adoption: 
 
 (a) Upon the efficiency of the firm. 
 
 (b) Upon the employees who will have to carry 
 it out. 
 
 4. Appeal for co-operation and further discussion 
 with suggestions. 
 
 During the speech, those present should take notes. It 
 is well for each to formulate his contribution to the dis- 
 cussion before rising. Simplicity and clearness are the 
 chief essentials of good, minor contributions. 
 
 The principles which hold for a departmental, voca- 
 tional talk hold also for professional conferences, for 
 
440 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 committee meetings, and for hearings before boards of 
 appropriation and management. The success of all such 
 conferences, and above all the departmental ones, is 
 remarkable. An esprit de corps is developed which 
 increases individual and combined efficiency many fold. 
 The man of superior position gets an insight into the 
 feelings and special problems of the subordinate and the 
 man in the ranks comes to realize the difficulties of those 
 in authority. The resulting information and sympathy 
 bring about healthy co-operation and friendliness to 
 replace possible antipathy. In this field of speech one can 
 do much good, for we influence men largely by personal 
 contact. The world will be reformed when men come to 
 know each other through sympathy, and not by the force 
 of external legislation and compulsion. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written exercises in this entire k»sson sliould be 
 carefully worked out. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Read over the lesson two or three times and take 
 up the test questions. 
 
 Second Day. — Plan and make an opening address at one of the 
 following occasions : 
 
 1. The laying of the corner stone of a hospital. Audi- 
 ence mixed, townspeople. 
 
 2. Graduation exercises of a boy's technical and trade 
 school. 
 
 3. Meeting to commemorate the anniversary of: Abra- 
 ham Lincoln, Robert E. Lee, Henry Ward Beeeher, William 
 Lloyd Garrison, General Grant, or some one you admire 
 and about whom .you know. Remember that this is not a 
 complete eulogy, bnt merely your introductory remarks. 
 Other speakers are to follow with elaborate speeches. 
 
 Third Day. — Write out four or five appropriate introductions to 
 dinner speakers. Make comments on the personalities of 
 the men introduced, the audience, and the occasion. 
 
THE CHAIRMAN OF OCCASION 441 
 
 FourlJi Ddi). — OiitliiU' c'JU'ct'ully jiiid devclo]) ()r;i]l\' ;tn after- 
 (liiiucr si)eec'h. lliwe in iiiiiul all the thiiif>s noted on page 
 4:^7 for after-dinner speakers to have in mind. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Outline a departmental talk that might well be 
 given in your business. Develop the talk orally. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 Tliese questions arc for the student to use in testing 
 his knowledge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are sugyestive merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 application of the principles, and are to be placed in the 
 notebook for future reference. 
 
 1. What is meant by an occasional address? 
 
 2. Give some of the characteristics that a good opening 
 address by the chairman of occasion should have. 
 
 3. How do you like Mr. Bullock's style? Is it fitting to 
 the occasion ? Could it be improved in any way ? How ? 
 
 ■4. What is the scope of the short introduction of a particu- 
 lar speaker by the chairman ? 
 
 5. What is to be said about the degree of flattery in a 
 complimentary introduction ? 
 
 6. What is the nature of the gathering at which the after- 
 dinner speaker makes his address? What is its general tone? 
 
 7. Give the general nature of the treatment of the theme 
 by an after-dinner speaker. Is contention in place? 
 
 8. Do you think Hay's after-dinner speech on Omar too 
 difficult for the man of average intelligence? If so, why? If 
 not, why? 
 
 9. Is Hay's style pleasing? Do you like his diction? If 
 asked to describe his style, what would you say ? 
 
 10. How does the second of his speeches given here compare 
 with the first? Which should make the greater "hit" at the 
 time of delivery? Which should abide longest in the mind after 
 it is heard? 
 
 11. Tell some of the duties of the toastmaster during the 
 progress of the dinner. 
 
 12. What do you think of the strung-together-joke style of 
 after-dinner speech? 
 
 13. What is meant by a vocational talk? 
 
 14. What are the prerequisites for success in this sort of 
 address ? 
 
 15. What are the advantages or good to be accomplished 
 by the vocational talk ? 
 
 442 
 
LESSON 25 
 practical speech directions for special occasions 
 
 1. The Biographical Eulogy 
 
 It is obvious that there are too many speech occasions 
 to permit of exhaustive illustration or even fairly satis- 
 factory classification. Consequently, we must select 
 those types which are most commonly used or which, 
 because of their structure, will help us to understand 
 others of a similar character. Of all these, the biograph- 
 ical eulogy is probably the most serviceable to study. It 
 cannot be delivered without a fair degree of attention to 
 structure, and when made, the structure worked out may 
 be applied to other kinds of speech. Its matter, a 
 critical appreciation of the life and character of a 
 man, is similar to the matter of a commemorative 
 address, which deals with national life and character or 
 mass attainments rather than individual attainments. 
 
 Other speeches also have matter similar in kind and 
 treatment to that of the eulogy. Such speeches are 
 made at anniversaries, the laying of cornerstones, dedi- 
 cations, and exercises of various sorts. The invective is 
 identical in form with the eulogy though the sentiments 
 expressed are of opposite nature. 
 
 We have given several examples of eulogistic speak- 
 ing. In Lesson 1, page 11, we quoted a passage from 
 Ijincoln's eulogy of Henry Clay. This selection shows 
 an analytic treatment of virtues. In Lesson 5, page 
 
 443 
 
444 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 69, we quoted a portion of Carl Scliurz's "Charles 
 Sumner." This was to illustrate the arrangement of 
 the body of the sjje^'ch according to sequence in time — 
 the chronological oidcr. Read these once more, as well 
 as the conclusion of AVendell Phillips' "Daniel O'Con- 
 nell." (Lesson 6, page £0.) 
 
 We may speak of eulogies as of two kinds, the formal 
 and the intimate. The formal eulogy deals with some 
 great man of national importance and is addressed to 
 those who have come in contact with him indirectly and 
 through his works only; the intimate eulogy is an appre- 
 ciation of a man by one who knew him well and is 
 addressed to the smaller circle of those who were also 
 his intimate friends. The great, formal eulogies are like 
 Greek tragedies in that they imjjress with distant and 
 universal grandeur ; but the informal eulogy warms 
 each individual 's heart. There are far more of this kind 
 delivered, but relatively few of them are recorded and 
 preserved. Not many men, and they only the great 
 orators of wide reputations, are called upon to deliver 
 formal eulogies, but many have to make the informal 
 kind at birthday gatherings, anniversaries of various 
 sorts, and funerals. 
 
 Before going into the characteristics of such an 
 address, it may be well to read one as an example. We 
 give a speech by Mr. Lewis Say re Burchard, of the New 
 York bar, eulogizing his old professor of pliysics at 
 the fiftieth anniversary of Professor Compton's gradua- 
 tion from the College of the City of New York — known 
 luring its early years as the Free Academy. This 
 speech was made to a large gathering of brother alumni 
 who knew the old professor as a teacher and to whom 
 every glimpse of the college of the past generation was 
 of real interest. Note, therefore, how this speech brings 
 out thoughts near and dear to every one present. 
 
SPECIAL OCC.\SIOx\S 445 
 
 PROFESSOR ALFRED GEORGE COMPTON 
 
 Professor Compton's ideal of his own biography may be 
 found in "Who's Who in America," and seems based on Mark 
 Twain's boyhood's dairy with its mif ailing daily entry of "Got 
 up. washed, and went to bed." His eoutribution amounts to 
 "Born so-and-so; educated public schools and Free Academy. 
 '53; taught ever since; and there you are." Let us try to pad 
 this out into worthier bulk. 
 
 Alfred George Compton was "l)orn within the sound of Bow 
 Bells," in Clipstone street, London, February 1, 1835. Part 
 of his childhood was spent in his father's earlier home in the 
 ([uaint and pretty old village of High Wycombe, a market town 
 of Buckinghamshire, up a long hill — indeed my cycling 
 memories insist upon that "long" — above Great IMarlow of the 
 little, and Henly of the great regattas. In 1842 his father. 
 William Compton, a maker of pianos, brought the family to 
 America in the ship Mediator — a voyage of thirty days — and 
 settled in New York. Their first home was in Sixth street, 
 east of Avenue D, near or in the region then and yet known 
 as "the Dry Dock," and near the thriving shipyards where 
 Henry Eckford and William TI. Webb built their famous old 
 New York clippers, and George Steers, uncle of Compton 's 
 chum, designed and built the America. 
 
 Child and product of New York's system of public education, 
 he first attended Public School No. 4, in Stanton street, under 
 Principal Patterson, and then "Old No. 15," in Fifth street. 
 of which Abraham Van Vleck. father of a well-known public 
 school teacher of the present day. was principal. Among his 
 class-mates here were John Hardy and James R. Steers, who 
 were graduated with him from the Free Academy. From No. 
 15 the boy went to School No. 14, then known as "the Poor- 
 house School," because, after its first building was burned, and 
 pending the completion of its new house on 27th street near 
 Third avenue (still standing), it found quarters in one of the 
 fine old grey-stone buildings formerly occupied by the County 
 Almshouses, on the then wooded heights of Bellevue fronting 
 the Ea.st River between 25th and 27th streets. 
 
 In this half-rural region the boy fitted for the newly estab- 
 lished Free Academy. Perhaps it may encourage — 
 "Some forlorn and shipwrecked brother" 
 to "take heart again," bail out, right ship, and resume his 
 
 "Sailing o'er life's solemn main." 
 to learn for the first time the incredible but authentic fact that 
 our peerless Compton, who, we think, axiomatically, can do 
 
446 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 anything, failed to pass the first entrance examination, held in 
 January, 1849. 
 
 For a few months he worked, probably as practically and 
 as humbly as the youthful Joseph Porter, afterward K. C. B. — 
 in the office of a certain Counsellor Burr, in William street; 
 and it is matter of curious speculation as to what the New 
 York bar, and perhaps the bench, would have gained — we 
 know what the College and ourselves would have lost — if the 
 sturdy, freckle-faced and sandy-headed little IManhattanized 
 Cockney lad of fourteen had not resolved to try again ; but 
 
 try he" did, and, of course . The students admitted in 
 
 June were afterward joined with those admitted in the previous 
 January, in what we know as our first class, '53. 
 
 It Avas a different college (though in the same building) and 
 a different New York then. Renwick's' Flemish turrets, then 
 stuccoed in imitation of brownstone, looked over green fields 
 and scattered houses to Union Square (which was half-way to 
 Greenwich), and to the roadside tavern on the site of the 
 Fifth Avenue Hotel (which was half-way to Chelsea), and to 
 the East River. Perhaps Madison Square, planned as a 
 "parade ground" to reach to the crest of Murray Hill, had 
 not then been cut down to 26th street. Third avenue, without 
 even car tracks, drew two straggling strips of little frame 
 houses past Bull's Head. Harlemwards; but the region was 
 more rus than in urhe. 
 
 The epoch-making Academy had a brave little force of 
 professors as path-breakers in those days. President Webster, 
 of stately memory, and the great Ross, soldiers, gentlemen, and 
 scholars both, brought their high traditions of West Point — 
 then in the first flush of the prestige derived from the astonish- 
 ing work of Scott and his West Pointers in the campaign 
 from Vera Cruz to INIexico — traditions which have left their 
 impress in thoroughness, discipline, and devotion to this day. 
 Irving, a nephew of Washington Irving, was Professor of 
 History and Belles Lettres; Docharty. of the text-books, 
 assistant in pure mathematics. In German, there was -Glau- 
 bensklee; in Spanish. ^Morales ; and in French, Roemer, the 
 ex-dragoon officer, bearing a fine air of camps and courts, who 
 had seen service in the. Low Countries, and, as an attache in 
 favor with his king, had visited the great camp where Radetsky 
 held Lombary for Austria, wlio. Ilien )i)i hfou sahreur, lived on 
 for us to see him as line ridlh niousfaclic riding like an officer 
 or driving e)i gmndc leiiuc in llic park. Later came Anthon and 
 Draper, inheriting names to conjui-e with in the circles of scholar- 
 
 '1Mi(" old Collcjic buildiiiL:. ilcsiiiiicd by tlic famous arcliitpct. Ronwick, 
 had turrets. 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 447 
 
 ship of that New York (it was Anthon who collected the begin- 
 nings of our little library and knew the joy of the bibliophile 
 when p]dward Everett Hale came to him to hunt authorities not 
 to be found elsewhere) ; Dr. Owen, whose Greek texts over a gen- 
 eration ago were American classics and were used even in Oxford ; 
 and the famous Dr. Wolcott Gibbs, soon to be succeeded by the 
 dashing, all-accomplished Doremus of international fame, whose 
 lectures, burning their diamonds and spending their thousands, 
 were the talk of the town, so that the papers called him "the 
 Barnum of Science"; and good old dominies, hearing from afar 
 the ominous mutterings of Darwin and Huxley and Spencer, 
 applauded in crowded churches his "reconciliations" of evolution 
 and the "six days" of orthodoxy; whose little arsenic-stained 
 ^larsh tubes decided causes celehres: whose improved compressed 
 granulated gunpowder blasted out eight miles of the JMont Cenis 
 tunnel and, marking a new advance in ordnance, made him a 
 welcome guest at the Tuileries under the Second Empire ; the 
 pi-esident of the Philharmonic and the host of Ole Bull and 
 Christine Nilsson, our pet host o' serenade nights, and to this 
 day unconquerably alert, interested and interesting. Under the 
 pioneers of this radical and brilliant group young Compton 
 studied, not through tutors or assistants, but with them face to 
 face in daily work, especially bearing away and cherishing the 
 impression of Professor Ross as the giant of those da.ys. 
 
 '53 had its commencement in Niblo's Theatre, for the old 
 Academy of IMusic, sacred to a long series of bestowals of sheep- 
 skins and medals, had not then been built. Hardy, his classmate 
 in old No. 15, and later our first congressman, had the Valedic- 
 tory, and Compton Third Honor, his theme being "Superstition." 
 After graduation it was his intention to become a civil engineer, 
 but the early fall brought to Hardy and Compton offers of tutor- 
 ships at the dazzling salary of $400, and the temptation was not 
 to be resisted. 
 
 From '53 to '69 he taught pretty nearly everything, history 
 and rhetoric, Wayland's Moral Philosophy, Spanish, Hart's 
 Catevhisni on the Constitution of the U. S.; and, during the war. 
 field and permanent fortification and stereotomy, till, in '69. on 
 the failure of health of Professor Nichols, he was appointed to 
 the chair of Applied ]\Iathematics, which department, as amended 
 from time to time, has lieen the field of his life-work and peculiar 
 success ever since. 
 
 Professor Anthon 's "Song of the Birds," sang of our alumni 
 as having "o'er Bartlett's puzzles banished sleep"; and Bart- 
 lett's Analytical Mechanics; Acoustics, Optics and Spherical 
 Astronomy will forever be associated by all graduates, from the 
 early '70 's on, with the Professor's personality and crystalline 
 
448 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 demonstratious. Through the great days of the '60 's and '70 's. 
 Calculus and Bartlett without mitigation were "required." The 
 sons of York in those days had no "option" with which to make 
 glorious summer of the winter of their discontent, as some of us 
 later chaps had; and the veterans say it was "man's work." 
 Bartlett was then a new professor al West Point, his books 
 were new, and ours was probably the first college after the V. S. 
 iMilitary Academy to use them. So Professor Bartlett used to 
 visit the College with great interest then (like the hero of Cole- 
 ridge's ballad) — 
 
 "To see how the work went on." 
 
 Surely, he found the work in the liands of a prince of 
 demonstrators. 
 
 The .years since '69 have been crowded ones for the professor. 
 It is in line with this truth that these laborious years, than 
 which one can imagine none in the life of any teacher more 
 fruitful in the immeasurable harvest of influence," give little data 
 to the biographer. It has certainly been fortunate for us. but 
 unfortunate for the fame of our professors as independent 
 investigators and authors, that, to an unparalleled extent, they 
 have been compelled to give all their time and strength to class- 
 room recitations. As Agassiz was "too busy to make money," 
 Professor Compton has been literally too busy to make himself 
 famous outside of the circle of his students, and. like that 
 Avonderful old man, Dwight, of Columbia Law School, his sur- 
 passing excellence as a teacher and his devotion to the fascinating 
 task of direct-contact work, has probably lost the world much, 
 and intrusted his monument only to the memory of his pupils. 
 Since 1869, he has taught large sections never less than fifteen 
 hours a week without an assistant to prepare his demonstrations. 
 For eighteen years after '69. he conducted, outside of his regular 
 hours, a three-year post-graduate course in civil engineering, 
 work remembered as priceless by his post-graduate students. 
 Breaking in his long day only by a modest revel at the historic 
 Chellborg's lunch room, it has generally been well towards even- 
 ing that he has started homeward. During the last twenty-one 
 years he has lal)ored for and obtained, laid-out, planned, super- 
 intended, even written text-books for, the entire mechanical and 
 manual training departments and courses. This field, always in 
 his thoughts and plans, was especially em])hasized to his atten- 
 tion by the Kiissian exhibit at the Centennial Exhibit icm of 3876. 
 Building on this and the work of Belford in Chicago and of the 
 Washington Fniversity in St. Louis, he has made the addition 
 and development of this department. his own especial contribution 
 to the College. 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 449 
 
 In '69, with Cleveland Abbe '('57), he conducted an eclii)se 
 t'xpedition to Sioux P'all.s City. Dakota Territory (then a hamlet 
 of twenty houses), and reported it to the Cincinnati Observatory, 
 and in '78. he led a few of his students to Colorado and observed 
 an eclipse and reported it to the Xaval Observatory at Washing- 
 Ion. He has reported a transit of ^lercury and done such other 
 astronomical work as the limited facilities at his disposal would 
 permit. And for many years has he not labored early and late, 
 faithfully, and at last successfully, for the new College ? Hence, 
 his publications have been few: A Manual of Logarithmic Com- 
 putation, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1881; First Lessons in 
 Wood Working, American Book Co. ; First Lessons in Metal 
 M'orking, AA^iley, 1890 ; The Speed-Lathe (with de Groodt), Wiley, 
 1898; Some Common Errors of Speech, Putnams, 1898 (intended 
 as an introduction to another work on English yet in ]\ISS.) 
 
 Upon the resignation of General Webb in 1902, and pending 
 the selection and installation of a new president, the executive 
 duties of the presidency have been intrusted by the Board of 
 Trustees to Professor Compton. under the title of Supervising 
 Professor, and, later, of Acting President. This temporary head- 
 ship of his Alma ]\Iater crowns a half-century of unbroken service 
 with honor to the Trustees, the College, and himself, but it is the 
 devout prayer of every man that has ever sat under him that, 
 for the sake of those to come, the end of his teaching may not 
 befall for many a long year, and such is the abiding triumph 
 of his youthfulness that the prayer is surely answered at its 
 making. 
 
 Busy as the years have been, loyalty to a sacred trust of 
 friendship has imposed yet another burclen, which he has borne 
 as buoyantly and successfully as every other. Space forbids the 
 story, but Compton 's devotion to a friend, a Cuban patriot, whose 
 great estates were confiscated during the insurrections of '69, 
 saved the property to his widow, an American lady. It involved 
 journeys to Cuba, work in Spanish, endless litigation in Spanish, 
 Cuban, and American tribunals, twenty years of strenuous 
 trusteeship, and two .years of accounting, but, as always, he did 
 it and did it well. 
 
 He commands French, German, and Spanish, and is a member 
 of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers and the Ameri- 
 can Society of Civil Engineers. 
 
 Professor Compton married, June 10, 1874, ]Miss Francis E. 
 Feeks, formerly a teacher in the Normal College, and has a son 
 and two daughters living. 
 
 Has this indefatigable worker found no time to play ? Whether 
 it is the English in him, or simply because such a "first-class all- 
 around man" must know the .I'oys of the open air. this busy 
 
450 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 man has won and saved the secret of buoyant strength and cheer- 
 ful, lasting youthfulness — recreation. Of all manly sports, three 
 stand supreme in their manliness, their freedom from cruelty and 
 the excitement of competition, their insistence upon self-reliance, 
 courage, brains, skill, and the facing of the individual man with 
 the beauties and hostile powers of Nature — each finding its finest 
 and highest development when played single-handed, or, at least, 
 without paid or professional assistance— seamanship, moun- 
 taineering, and woodsmanship, or forest-cruising. Of these, 
 although he managed to get in some good Alpine climbing in 
 3902, the last-named has been Compton's especial field and joy. 
 In 1856, inspired by an article in Silliman's Journal, on "The 
 Exploration of the Adirondacks," Compton, with Theodore 
 Banta of the class of '53, made his first trip into the then 
 untraveled, uncharted, and almost unknown north woods. On 
 the first trip he found a local guide and climbed IMt. INIarcy. 
 Since then, for many seasons, he has traversed the Adirondacks 
 without map or guide or gun, finding his own way like the 
 Indians, courcnrs du hois, and trappers of our boyhood's books, 
 and living the Thoreau life next to Nature. Like Thoreau, carry- 
 ing perhaps one choice book in his pack and more in his head, 
 and preferring watching a bird or a wild creature to killing it, 
 and loving the scent of the woods and his fire too keenly to miss 
 them in tobacco, and, like "Walt Whitman, "loafing and inviting 
 his soul," he has drunk deep of the life-restoring spell of the 
 forest. One season, by his campfires, he taught himself the 
 integral calculus, but, iDetter, through scores of threaded camps 
 on lake side and mountain shoulder,- he has learned to "renew his 
 youth like the eagles." 
 
 Such noble sport demands the freedom of the long vacation. 
 Between whiles, he does a bit of tennis and is a keen hand at 
 this latter-day, impossibly scientific croquet, which seems a sort 
 of outdoor long-distance billiards — the crociuet of patient cranks 
 with quite impossible eyes and nerves and wrists. 
 
 It has always been a pet fancy of mine that if Compton were 
 washed up like Robinson Crusoe on some great new island with 
 the necessary natural resources and given a few tools from the 
 ship, and say a century of life and unskilled labor without limit, 
 but without a book, he could reproduce civilization — like the 
 scientist in Jules Verne's L'llc Mystcnuse — "only more so"; 
 that, sooner or later, he M'ould be running a locomotive built by 
 himself out of the ])rodu('ts of his own mining, playing Chopin 
 on a Com])t()n ]>iano, putting little brown Juniors and Seniors 
 through ]^artl(^tt, dictating from memory a few European liter- 
 atures to ishnid-made ph()n()gra|)hs and typewriters, and — to 
 bring my undcr-gi-aduate di-cam down to date — INIarconigraphing 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 451 
 
 back to New York to see how the family was getting along and 
 achdsing the sailing of a steamer equipped Avith island-made 
 chronometer, sextant, and compass, and Compton's Bowditch's 
 Navigator (of conrse supplied with Compton's own logarithms) 
 — and having through it all the serenest of good times, and never 
 once by any chance hurried or worried, out of temper, idle, sick, 
 or old. 
 
 The piano is, perha])s hereditarily, his instrument. He wears 
 his hair too normally to be a virtuoso, but plays as a gentleman 
 should, and a scholar — with sufficient technique to make avail- 
 able and enjoyable his ranging command of the composers. 
 Imagine, you who have felt the charm of his class-room clemon- 
 strations, the professor reading you Bach or Beethoven. 
 
 Seated thus at his keyboard with his loved ones around him, 
 let us leave the picture of him, wishing him many a long and 
 happy year, rich in the memory of many tasks of many kinds 
 well done, and in the loyal love of the thousands of his "boys," 
 who are better equipped doers of the world's work for liaving 
 sat under him and truer men and gentlemen for knowing him. 
 
 2. Observations on the Personal Tribute (Eulogy) 
 
 1. Preparation. — KnoAv tlie man through close, per- 
 sonal contact. Gather all information you can, not 
 experienced by you, from others who did have the direct 
 experience. If anything must be "read up," be very 
 thorough in the reading; get all aspects and master 
 everything most thoroughly. 
 
 2. Organization. — As indicated in Lesson 5, page 69, 
 the general plan of a eulogy is either chronological in 
 order of material, or according to some scheme of 
 analysis for the elements or virtues of the character and 
 attainments. Sometimes also, as in the example just 
 given, the two are combined. Observe, in the example 
 just given, the effective reserving of the enthusiastic 
 discussion of traits for the end, after matters of history 
 had been disposed of. 
 
 3. Details. — (a) Select those things which will appeal 
 strongly to the audience addressed, (b) Illustrations 
 and references should be made with the particular 
 
452 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 audience's experience and mental equipment in mind. 
 (c) As far as possible, be concrete rather than abstract; 
 use images rather than concepts. Even when bringing 
 out some abstract quality, it is often better to indicate 
 what is meant by a concrete deed or situation, than to 
 expound it in general terms. (d) Be intimate and 
 personal in your treatment rather than lofty, distant, 
 and grand. 
 
 4. Tone. — The tone is established by the occasion. 
 The speech just given is jolly or at least happy. The 
 subject of the address is present and all are happy. If 
 such a speech were made at a farewell dinner or time 
 of retirement from office, the tone would be less jovial, 
 somewhat gentler, and more mellow. A funeral address 
 may use data similar to that just given, but the tone 
 should be more solemn and gravely gentle. 
 
 3. IxArouEAL Address 
 
 The general purpose of the inaugural address is to 
 outline policies to be pursued in office. The tone is 
 different from that of a jjre-election promise needed to 
 obtain approval and, possibly, votes. The place has been 
 secured and the tone of the address is firm and direct. 
 
 There are, as a rule, two things to be recorded in such 
 a speech, (1) an analysis of the situation faced because 
 of past developments and (2) an outline of methods or 
 policies in the future. Of course, proper adaptation to 
 audience, occasion, and office must be made. The usual 
 principles of arrangement, explained in Lesson 5, apply. 
 
 The Second Inaugural Address of Lincoln may be 
 taken as an example. We shall give here the opening 
 and all of the speech up to the part already printed in 
 Lesson 20, page 'Mu. Kead l)oth parts so as to get a 
 combined ini])ression of tlie entire s))eecli. 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 453 
 
 LIxVCOLN S SECOND INAUtUTKAL ADDRESS 
 
 I. Fellow Count rumen: At this second appearing to take 
 the oath of the presidential office, there is less occasion for 
 an extended address than there was at the first. Then a 
 statement, somewhat in detail, of a course to be pursued, - 
 seemed fitting and proper. Now^, at the expiration of four 
 3'ears, during which public declarations have been constantly 
 called forth on every point and phase of the great contest 
 which still absorbs the attention and engrossi^s the energies 
 of the nation, little that is new could be i)resented. The 
 progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, 
 is as well known to the public as to myself ; and it is, I trust, 
 reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high 
 hopes for the future, no prediction in regard to it is to be 
 ventured. 
 
 II. On- the occasion corresponding to this, four years ago, all 
 thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil 
 war. All dreaded it — all sought to avert it. While the 
 inaugural address was being delivered from this place, 
 devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insur- 
 gent agents were in this city seeking to destroy it without 
 war — seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects, by 
 negotiation. Both parties deprecated war ; but one of them 
 would rather make war than let the nation survive; and the 
 other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the 
 war came. 
 
 III. One eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, 
 not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the 
 southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and 
 powerful interest. All knew that this interest was, some- 
 how, the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and 
 extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents 
 would rend the Union, even by war; while the government 
 claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial 
 enlargement of it. 
 
 (Now turn to page 367, Lesson 20, for the rest of the 
 speech.) 
 
 Note that Lincoln faces one situation only, the war; 
 with one cause, slavery ; to he settled in one way, con- 
 tinned, effective war until peace without slavery is 
 attained. 
 
4.54 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 The following is a typical outline whieli may be nseil 
 at varions iaaugriral occasions. 
 L Intnxiuction appropriate to audience and occasion. 
 EL Body of the speeck. 
 
 1. The situation faced by the body, society, or 
 
 organization. 
 
 2. Policies to be pursued. 
 
 (a) Greneral. guiding principles. 
 
 (b) Specific acts or lines of conduct. 
 
 3. Prosi>ects of success. 
 TTT. Conclusion. 
 
 1. Appeal for co-operation. 
 
 2. Pledge to conscientious service. 
 
 3. Trust in desired outcome. 
 
 Addresses made on retirement from office are, in cer- 
 tain respects, similar. The outline just given may be 
 used with the following changes and additions. (II-l) 
 Beview what was accomplished during the course of 
 administration. (II-2) Advice concerning future develop- 
 ments, (in) Thank those who co-operated during the 
 term of office just expired; express confidence in what 
 the future will bring forth. 
 
 4. Spi3:ch with a Peacttcajl Object to a ^Iixed 
 audtexce 
 
 Among the most difficult- speeches to make is one to 
 a popular audience upon a vital issue. Here all the 
 resources of the speaker must be called into service. 
 TVe give as the example for study, Daniel O'Connell's 
 famous address on Tara HiU, to what was one of the 
 greatest mass meetings the world has ever seen. It is 
 comparable with the mighty efforts of Demosthenes 
 with th^ citizen gatherings of Athens. While reading 
 it, have in mind the fact that O'Connell was trying to 
 stir resentment against the Union and at the same time 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIO^CS ^5 
 
 •> restiam ads d TioleiKe. Hkme^ it k «£E&«h to stir 
 a erow^d so tlat all will feel witk tke orator. -~ 
 
 diffieolt to keep its eoiiseqiievt aets vi^im ' 
 of ratioaial restraint. Olfi^rre hoc O'Coanel 
 
 In paragrapli I, he estabfisbes tie r^— 
 
 between Umsel^ Aose present, aad tke proii^i^ i^^ 
 fstee. Ofaserve kow he secures interest and attemko 
 ani obtains a favorable attitnde toward humt4f iSi^ 
 prin^des in Lessons 3 and -L' The body c: :- 
 
 m^it is in U to ^^I wrtii xh^ siEmraary im . -- 
 
 scheme of arrai^einent <see> L^-s&om 5 for |Minefp4ek^ is 
 a devekfnnait c^ general jHindples of rig^ in IL to 
 anthoritative siqiport of the jmneqtk^. TIT, and Aove 
 to a pres^itaticn of specific act^ of an obje^ionable 
 character: in IV, fraud and violence: in V. bribay ^id 
 mon^j e»:»rnipli<Mi: in VL the destmctkm of ifcinstry. 
 
 Tbe summary in VII carries oet mles 4&c»ss€*i m 
 Lesson 6. e^>eoaIly page 9L while the rest of the spi5€*^ 
 is a skinfol a^>eal fsee Le^^m 6. pase 96. onk to the 
 particular audience he was addres^ng. 
 
 Bead that perflation Vm to XL ear^olly and note 
 the prejudices and deep efncitioi^ cm which he f^aj^. 
 Obse-rve^ how he refers to TTeflii^on on tke <»e hand an>l 
 the Queen €m Ae oth»-. to the soldie^rs and to the B3irUp»- 
 men. and how he turns to his own advanta^ r^siipns 
 sentimf»it and love of country. Toward 1^ emd ^ 
 makes a most effective ms* €*f mass response as &e basis 
 of final agre^n^t and obe«fience. »Fr»r pTiisepI^. 5*e^ 
 Lesson 16 and espeaally pages f96. fi*?. f5•^- > 
 
 TMs is the last exanq^ wc ^all oSer. Study it well 
 an*! e&ieavor to identify in it the carrying o«t of 
 r»rineipfes developed in tfiis course of ksso«s in Effective 
 Pulfie Speaking. Study it also with a Tiew to piepari^ 
 original speeches alozLg similar Ii5?es- Make a earefol 
 ni>teboci: analvsis. 
 
456 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 REPEAL OF THE UNION 
 UaiiiL'I O'Cuini.'ll 
 
 I. Fclloic-1 risk men: It would 1)l' the extreme of atfectation 
 in me to suggest that I have not some elaim to be the leader 
 of this majestic meeting. It would be worse than affectation ; 
 it would be driveling folly, if I were not to feel the awful 
 responsibilit}' to my country and mj^ Creator which the part 
 I have taken in this might.y movement imposes on me. Yes ; 
 I feel the tremendous nature of that responsibility. Ireland 
 is roused from one end to the other. Her multitudinous 
 population has but one expression and one wish, and that 
 is for the extinction of the Union and the restoration of her 
 nationality. (A voice: "No compromise!") AVho talks of 
 compromise? I have come here, not for the purpose of 
 making a schoolboy's attempt at declamatory eloquence, not 
 to exaggerate the historical importance of the spot on which 
 we now stand, or to endeavor to revive in your recollection 
 any of those poetic imaginings respecting it which have been 
 as familiar as household words. But this it is impossible to 
 conceal or deny, that Tara is surrounded l)y historical 
 reminiscences which give it an importance worthy of being 
 considered by everyone who approaches it for political pur- 
 poses, and an elevation in the public mind which no other 
 part of Ireland possesses. We are standing upon Tara oJ 
 the Kings ; the spot where the monarchs of Ireland were 
 elected, and where the chieftains of Ireland bound them- 
 selves, by the most solemn pledges of honor, to protect their 
 native land against the Dane and every stranger. This was 
 emphatically the spot from which emanated every social 
 power and legal authority by which the force of the entire 
 country was concentrated for the purposes of national 
 defence. 
 
 II. On this spot I have a most important duty to i)erform. I 
 here y)rotest, in the name of my country and in the name of 
 my God, against the unfounded and unjust Union. My 
 proposition to Ireland is that the Union is not binding on 
 her people. It is void in conscience and in principle, and 
 as a matter of constitutional law I attest these facts. Yes, 
 I attest by everything that is sacred, without being profane, 
 the truth of my assertions. There is no real union between 
 the two countries, and my ])roposition is that there was no 
 authority given to anyone to pass the Act of Union. Neither 
 the English nor the Irish Legislature was competent to pass 
 that Act, and I arraign it on these grounds. One authority 
 alone could make that Act binding, and that was the voice 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 457 
 
 of the people of Ireland. The Irish Parliament Avas elected 
 to make laws and not to make legislatures ; and, therefore, it 
 had no right to assume the authority to pass the Act of 
 Union. The Iri.sh Parliament was elected by the Irish people 
 as their trustees; the people were their masters, and the 
 members were their servants, and had no right to transfer 
 the property to any other power on earth. If the Irish 
 Parliament had transferred its power of legislation to the 
 French Chamber, would any man assert that the Act was 
 valid? Would any man be mad enough to assert it; would 
 any man be insane enough to assert it; and would the 
 insanity of the assertion be mitigated by sending any number 
 of members to the French Chamber? Everybody must 
 admit that it would not. What care I for France?— and I 
 care as little for England as for France, for both countries 
 are foreign to me. The very highest authority in England 
 has proclaimed us to be aliens in blood, in religion, and in 
 language. (Groans.) Do not groan him for having proved 
 himself honest on one occasion by declaring my opinion. 
 But to show the invalidity of the Union I could quote the 
 authority of Locke on "Parliament." I will, however, only 
 detain you by quoting the declaration of Lord Plunket in 
 the Irish Pcirliament, who told them that they had no 
 authority to transfer the legislation of the country to other 
 hands. As well, said he. might a maniac imagine that the 
 blow by which he destroys his wretched body annihilates his 
 immortal soul, as you to imagine that you can annihilate the 
 soul of Ireland — her constitutional rights. 
 III. I need not detain you by quoting authorities to show the 
 invalidity of the LTnion. I am here the representative of 
 the Irish nation, and in the name of that moral, temperate, 
 virtuous and religious people, I proclaim the Union a nullity. 
 Saurin, who had been the representative of the Tory party 
 for twenty years, distinctly declared that the Act of Union 
 was invalid. He said that the Irish House of Commons had 
 no right, had no power, to pass the Union, and that thv 
 people of Ireland would be justified, the first opportunity 
 that presented itself, in effecting its repeal. So they are. 
 The authorities of the country were charged Avith the enact- 
 ment, the alteration, or the administration of its laws. These 
 were their powers ; but they had no authority to alter or 
 overthrow the Constitution. I therefore proclaim the nullity 
 of the Union. In the face of Europe I proclaim its nullity. 
 In the face of France, especially, and of Spain. T proclaim 
 its nullity; and I proclaim its nullity in the face of the 
 liberated States of America. 
 
458 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 IV. I go farther, and proclaim its nullity on the grounds of 
 the iniquitous means by which it was carried. It was 
 effected by the most flagrant fraud. A rebellion was pro- 
 voked by the Government of the day, in order that they 
 might have a pretext for crushing the liberties of Ireland. 
 There was this addition to the fraud, that at the time of the 
 Union, Ireland had no legal protection. The Habeas Corpus 
 Act was suspended, and the lives and liberties of the people 
 were at the mercy of courts martial. You remember the 
 shrieks of those who suffered under martial law. One day, 
 from Trim, the troops marched out and made desolate the 
 country around them. No man was safe during the entire 
 time the Union was under discussion. The next fraud was 
 that the Irish people were not allowed to meet to remonstrate 
 against it. Two count}^ meetings, convened by the High 
 Sheriff's of these counties, pursuant to requisitions presented 
 to them, were dispersed at the point of the bayonet. In 
 King's County the High Sheriff called the people together 
 in the Court-house, and Colonel Connor of the North Cork 
 Militia, supported by artillery and a troop of horse, entered 
 the Court-house at the head of 200 of his regiment and 
 turned out the Sheriff, Magistrates, Grand Jurors, and free- 
 holders assembled to petition against the enactment of the 
 Union. In Tipperary a similar scene took place. A meeting 
 convened by the High Sheriff' was dispersed at the point of 
 the bayonet. Thus public sentiment was stifled; and if there 
 was a compact, as is alleged, it is void on account of the 
 fraud and force by which it was carried. But the voice of 
 Ireland, though forcibly suppressed at public meetings, was 
 not altogether dumb. Petitions Avere presented against the 
 Union to which were attached no less than 770.000 signa- 
 tures. And there were not 3,000 signatures for the Union, 
 notwithstanding all the Government could do. 
 
 V. My next impeachment against the Union is the gross 
 corruption with which it was carried. No less than £1,275,- 
 000 was spent upon the rotten boroughs, and £2,000,000 was 
 given in direct bribery. There was not one office that was 
 not made instrumental to the carrying of the measure. Six 
 or seven judges were raised to the Bench for the votes they 
 gave in its support ; and no less than twelve bishops were 
 elevated to tlie Episcopal Bench for having taken the side 
 of the Union ; for corruption tlien spared nothing to effect its 
 purpose — corruption was never carried so far; and if this 
 is to be binding on the Irish nation, there is no use in 
 honesty at all. Yet in spite of all the means employed, the 
 enemies of Irelaiul did nol succeed at once. There was a 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 459 
 
 majority of eleven against tlie Union the first time. J hit 
 before the proposition was brought torward a second time, 
 members who could not be influenced to vote for the 
 measure were bribed to vacate their seats, to which a number 
 of English and Scotch officers, brought over for the pur- 
 pose, Avere elected, and by their votes the Union was carried. 
 In the name of the great Irish nation I proclaim it a nullity. 
 At the time of the Union the national debt of Ireland was 
 only £20.000,000. The debt of England was £440.000,000. 
 England took upon herself one-half of the Irish debt, but 
 she placed upon Ireland one-half of the £440.000,000. Eng- 
 land since that period has doubled her debt, and admitting 
 a proportionate increase against Ireland, the Irish debt 
 would not now be more than £40,000,000; and you may 
 believe me when I say it in the name of the great Irish 
 people, that Ave will never pay one shilling more. In fact, 
 Ave owe but £30,000, as is clearly demonstrated in a book 
 lately published by a near and dear relative of mine. jNIr. 
 John O'Connell, the member for Kilkenny. I am proud that 
 a son of mine Avill be able, Avhen the repeal is carried, ta 
 meet any of England's financiers, and to prove to them the 
 gross injustice inflicted upon Ireland. 
 
 ^^I. My next impeachment of the Union is its destructive and 
 deleterious effect upon the industry and prosperity of the 
 country. The county of ]\Ieath Avas once studded Avith noble 
 residences. "What is it noAV ? Even on the spot Avhere Avhat 
 is called the great Duke of Wellington Avas born, instead of 
 a splendid castle or noble residence, the briar and the 
 bramble attest the treachery that produced them. You 
 remember the once prosperous linen-weavers of ]\Ieath. 
 There is scarcely a penny paid to them uoaa^ In short, the 
 Union struck doAvn the manufacturers of Ireland. The Com- 
 missioners of the Poor LaAv prove that 120,000 persons in 
 Ireland are in a state of destitution during the greater part 
 of each year. Hoav is it that in one of the most fertile 
 countries in the AA^orld this should occur? 
 
 VII. The Irish ne\"er broke any of their bargains nor their 
 treaties, and England never kept one that Avas made on her 
 part. There is noAV a union of the legislatures, but I deny 
 that there is a union of the nations, and I again proclaim 
 the Act a nullity. England has given to her people a muni- 
 cipal reform extensive and satisfactory, AA-hile to Ireland she 
 gives a municipal reform crippled and Avorthless. But the 
 I'^nion is more a nullity on ecclesiastical grounds : for why 
 should the great majority of the people of Ireland pay for 
 the support of a religion AAdiich they do not believe to be 
 
4G0 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 true! The Union was carried by the most abominable cor- 
 ruption and briberj^ by financial robbery on an extensive 
 scale, which makes it the more heinous and oppressive ; and 
 the result is that Ireland is saddled with an unjust debt, her 
 commerce is taken from her, her trade is destroyed, and a 
 large number of her people thus reduced to misery and 
 distress. 
 VIII. Yes. the people of Ireland are cruelly oppressed, and are 
 we tamely to stand by and allow our dearest interests to be 
 trampled upon? Are we not to ask for redress! Yes, we 
 will ask for that which alone will give us redress — a parlia- 
 ment of our own. And you will have it too, if you are cjuiet 
 and orderly, and join with me in my present struggle. 
 (Cheers.) Your cheers will be convej^ed to England. Yes, 
 the majority of this mighty multitude will be taken there. 
 Old Wellington began by threatening us, and talked of civil 
 war, but he says nothing about it now. He is getting inlet 
 holes made in stone barracks. Now only think of an old 
 general doing such a thing, as if, were there anything going 
 on, the people would attack .stone walls! I have heard that 
 a great deal of brandy and biscuits have been sent to the 
 barracks, and I sincerely hope the poor soldiers will get 
 some of them. Your honest brothers, the soldiers, Avho have 
 been sent to Ireland, are as orderly and as brave men as any 
 in Ireland. I am .sure that not one of you has a single 
 complaint to make against them. If any of you have, say so. 
 (Cries of "No!") They are the bravest men in the world, 
 and therefore I do not disparage them at all when I state 
 this fact, that if they are sent to make war against the 
 people, I have enough women to beat them. There is no 
 mockery or delusion in what I say. At the last fight for 
 Ireland, when we were betrayed by a reliance on English 
 honor, in which we would never again confide — for I would 
 as soon confide in the honor of a certain black gentleman 
 who has two horns and hoofs — but, as I was saying, at the 
 last battle for Ireland, when, after two days' hard fighting, 
 the Irish were driven back by the fresh troops brought up 
 by the English to the bridge of Limerick, at that point when 
 the Irish soldiers retired fainting, it was that the women 
 of Limerick threw themselves in the way, and drove the 
 enemy back fifteen, twenty, or thirty paces. Several of the 
 poor women were killed in the struggle, and their shrieks of 
 agony being heard by their countrymen, they again rallied 
 and determined to die in their defence, and, doubly valiant 
 in the defence of the women, they togetlier routed the Si.xons. 
 . Yes, I repeat, I have enough women to beat all the army 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS 461 
 
 of Ireland. It is idle for any minister or statesman to 
 suppose for a moment that he can put down sueh a struggle 
 as this for liberty. The only thing I fear is the eonduet of 
 some ruffians who are called Eibbonmen. I know there are 
 such blackguards, for I have traced them from Manchester. 
 They are most dangerous characters, and it will be the duty 
 of every Repealer, whether he knows or by any means can 
 discover one of them, immediately to hand him over to justice 
 and the law. The Ribbonmen only, by their proceedings, 
 can injure the great and religious cause in which I am now 
 engaged, and in which I have the people of Ireland at my 
 back. 
 
 IX. This is a holy festival in the Catholic Church — the da^' 
 upon which the IMother of our Saviour ascended to meet her 
 Son, and reign with Him forever. On such a day I will not 
 tell a falsehood. I hope I am under her protection while 
 addressing you, and I hope that Ireland will receive the 
 benefit of her prayers. Our Church has prayed against 
 Espartero and his priest-terrorizing, church-plundering 
 marauders, and he has since fallen from power — nobody 
 knows how, for he makes no etfort to retain it. He seems to 
 have been bewildered by the Divine curse, for without one 
 rational effort the tyrant of Spain has faded before the 
 prayers of Christianity. I hope that there is a blessing in 
 this day, and, fully aware of its solemnity, I assure you that 
 I am afraid of nothing but Ribbonism, which alone can 
 disturb the present movement. I have proclaimed from 
 this spot that the Act of Union is a nullity ; but in seeking 
 for Repeal I do not want you to disobey the law. I have 
 only to refer to the words of the Tories' friend, Saurin, to 
 prove that the Union is illegal. I advise you to obey the 
 law until you have the word of your beloved Queen to tell 
 you that you shall have a Parliament of your own. The 
 Queen — God bless her! — will yet tell you that you shall 
 have a legislature of your own— three cheers for the Queen ! 
 (Great cheering.) 
 
 X. On the 2d of January last I called this Repeal year, and 
 I was laughed at for doing so. Are they laughing now? 
 No: it is now my turn to laugh and I will now say that in 
 twelve months more we shall have our Parliament again 
 on College Green. The Queen has the undoubted preroga- 
 tive at any time to order her Ministers to issue writs, 
 which, being signed by the Lord Chancellor, the Irish 
 Parliament would at once be convened without the necessity 
 of applying to the English Legislature to repeal what they 
 appear to consider a valid Act of Union. And if dirty 
 
462 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING 
 
 Sugden would not sign the writ, an Irish Chancellor would 
 soon be found who would do so. And if we have our Parlia- 
 ment again in Dublin, is there, I would ask, a coward 
 amongst you who would not rather die than allow it to be 
 taken away by any Act of Union? (Loud cries of "No one 
 would ever submit to it!" "We'd rather die!" etc.) To 
 the last man. (Cries of "To the last man!") Let every 
 man who would not allow the Act of Union to pass hold 
 up his hand. (An immense forest of hands was shown.) 
 When the Irish Parliament is again assembled, I will defy 
 any power on earth to take it from us again. Are you all 
 ready to obey me in the course of conduct which I have 
 pointed out to you? (Cries of "Yes, yes!") When I dis- 
 miss you today, will you not disperse and go peaceably to 
 your homes— ("Yes, yes, we will!") — every man, woman, 
 and child ? — in the same tranquil manner as you have assem- 
 bled ? ( " Yes, yes ! " ) But if I want you again tomorrow, will 
 you not come to Tara Hill? ("Yes, yes!") Remember, I 
 will lead you into no peril. If danger should arise, it will 
 be in consequence of some persons attacking us, for we are 
 determined not to attack any person ; and if danger does 
 exist you will not find me in the rear rank. When we get 
 our Parliament, all our grievances w\\\ be put to an end ; 
 our trade will be restored, the landlord will be placed on a 
 firm footing, and the tenants who are now so sadly oppressed 
 W'ill be placed in their proper position. "Law, Peace, and 
 Order" is the motto of the Repeal banner, and I trust you 
 will all rally round it. (Cries of "We are all Repealers!") 
 I have to inform you that all the magistrates who have 
 recently been deprived of the Commission of the Peace have 
 been appointed by the Repeal Association to settle any dis- 
 putes which may arise among the Repealers in their respec- 
 tive localities. On next Monday persons will be appointed 
 to settle disputes without expense, and I call on every man 
 who is the friend of Ireland to have his disputes settled by 
 arbitrators without expense, and to avoid going to the Petty 
 Sessions. 
 XL I believe I am now in a position to announce to you that 
 in twelve months more we shall not be without having a 
 "Hurrah for the Parliament on College Green !" (Immense 
 cheering.) Your shouts are almost enough to call to life 
 those who rest in the grave. I can almost fancy the spirits 
 of the mighty dead hovering over you. and the ancient kings 
 and chiefs of Ireland, from the clouds, listening to the 
 shouts sent up from Tnra for Irish liberty. Oh T Ireland is 
 a lovely land, blessed with the boiuiteous gifts of Nature, 
 
SPECIAL OCCASIONS ' 463 
 
 and where is the coward who would not die for her? (Cries 
 of "Not one !") Your cheers will penetrate to the extremity 
 of civilization. Our movement is the admiration of the 
 world, for no other country can show so much force with 
 so much propriety of conduct. No other country can show 
 a people assembled for the highest national purposes that 
 can actuate man ; can show hundreds of thousands able in 
 strength to carry any battle that ever was fought, and yet 
 separating with the tranquillity of schoolboys. You have 
 stood by me long — stand by me a little longer, and Ireland 
 wiU be again a nation. 
 
 Assignment of Work 
 
 The written cxereises in this entire lesson sliould he 
 carefully worked ont. Keep copies of the written exer- 
 cises in vour notebook. 
 
 First Day. — Study the lesson thoroughly and make a written 
 analysis of Mr. Burchard's eulogy. Comment in your note- 
 book on the excellence of the arrangement and make sug- 
 gestions for changes if you think improvement might be 
 effected. 
 
 Second Day. — Outline an informal eulogy of someone of distinc- 
 tion in a circle, more or less wide, with which you are 
 familiar. Plan it to be delvs^ered at an anniversary or occa- 
 sion when he is to be presented with a gift in recognition of 
 services rendered. Write down definitely the occasion, the 
 nature of the audience, and your relation to both. 
 
 Third Day. — Orally develop and deliver the speech as planned. 
 
 Fourth Day. — Outline and deliver an inaugural address as: 
 president of a social club, president of a stock company 
 formed to supply water to a valley used by farmers, presi- 
 dent of a political club of radical character in a neighbor- 
 hood formerly conservative, or of any other position of which 
 you know and in which you take an interest. 
 
 Fifth Day. — Rule several sheets of foolscap paper down the 
 center. On the left side, write a careful and detailed analysis 
 of the O'Connell speech. On the right side, indicate the 
 lesson of this course, and page on which a comment or prin- 
 ciple related to the points noted, is to be found. 
 
TEST QUESTIONS 
 
 These (juestioiis are for the student to use in testing 
 liis kiiouhHlge of the principles in this lesson. They 
 are siifnicfitivc merely, dealing largely with the practical 
 a])plieation of the jsrinciples, and are to be placed in the 
 iiotehook for future reference. 
 
 1. Why is the euh)gy picked out as a type speech worthy of 
 study ? 
 
 2. What are the two general plans of arrangement suggested 
 either pure or combined for the eulogy ? 
 
 3. Give the difference between the formal and the intimate 
 eulogy. W^hich kind is used more often? Which is usually 
 recorded and preserved ? 
 
 4. How do you like the style of the Burchard speech? Do 
 you think the matter would be ver^^ -interesting to men graduated 
 from the same college as Compton and Burchard ? 
 
 5. How important is deep and genuine feeling through thor- 
 ough familiarity to success in the eulogy ? 
 
 6. What are the general purposes of an inaugural address ? 
 
 7. Give a type outline for an inaugural address. 
 
 8. Can you construct a farewell address? Have you ever 
 read Washington 's famous farewell address ? 
 
 9. Why is it difficult to make a speech to a popular audience 
 on a vital topic ? Why is such an audience more difficult to 
 influence successfully than a special audience? 
 
 10. Does O'Connell open his speech like a man who has to 
 establish himself with the mixed crowd before him, or like one 
 who is sure of his reception by any Irish crowd? 
 
 11. In paragraph II he says, "Would any man be mad 
 enough to assert it; would any man be insane enough, etc.?" 
 Have you ever come across this rhetorical device before ? Have 
 you read the speech of Brutus over the body of Caesar in 
 Shakespeare's Julius Caesar? 
 
 ^2. In how many places does the text show that O'Connell 
 adapted his remarks to indications of feeling given by the 
 audience? Does this require a high degree of ease and skill as 
 a speaker ? 
 
 464 
 
INDEX 
 
 Action, nature of, 291-96. 
 
 Adams, John, 299-300. 
 
 After-dinner speech, 430-38. 
 
 Aluminum compounds, Wiley on, 
 258-60. 
 
 Americanism, Schurz on, 92-93. 
 
 Analogy, 266-67. 
 
 Anniversary address, 443-52. 
 
 Appeal, 96-99: to action, 291-307. 
 
 Application, 92-96. 
 
 Argumentation, 273-87. See also 
 Arguments. 
 
 Aiguments, 229-47, 251-69. 
 
 Aristotle, 85, 358-59. 
 
 Arrangement of material, 68-81, 151- 
 52, 356-59. 
 
 Attention, general nature, 327-29 ; of 
 audience, 49-54, 327-42 ; of speak- 
 er, 327-42 : of speaker during prep- 
 aration, 331-33 ; to audience, 335- 
 36 ; to plan, 336-37. 
 
 Attiactiveness, personal, 44-45, 129- 
 39. 
 
 Auto-suggestion, 142-44. 
 
 Bathing, 405-6. 
 
 Bearing in an argument, 287. 
 
 Beecher, Henrv Ward, 7-8. 39-40, 
 
 51-52, 130-31, 179-80, 216-18, 336, 
 
 404. 
 Blaine, James G., 180. 
 Body, weight of, 109-10, 396. 
 Body of a speech. 17-18, 67-81. 
 Boston, Everett's description of, 17 4- 
 
 76. 
 Boston Massacre: Hancock on, 42: 
 
 Warren on, 261-64. 
 Breathing, 115-22, 334, 404-5. 
 Briefing, 273-84. 
 Buckley, Dr., 184-85. 
 Bullock, Alexander H., 428-29. 
 Burchard, Lewis S., 444-51. 
 Burden of proof, 285-87. 
 Burke, Edmund, 74-75. 
 
 Canal Toll Bill, Root on. 96-97. 
 
 Card bibliogi-aphy, 321-22. 
 
 Causation: as a basis of order, 75- 
 76 : generalization of, 254-60. 
 
 Chairman: of meeting, 412-15; of 
 occasion, 427-30. 
 
 Charity, Paul on, 219. 
 
 Chronological order, 69-73. 
 
 Classification, generalization of, 25 1- 
 56. 
 
 Clay, Henrv, 11-12, 99, 159-60, 301-2. 
 
 Clothing, 402-3. 
 
 Communication between minds, im- 
 portance of, 2-3. 
 
 Compton, A. G., Burchard's eulogy 
 of. 444-51. 
 
 Concepts, 211-25. 
 
 Conclusion of a speech, 18-19, 85-101. 
 
 Confidence, 139-44. 
 
 Conkling, Roscoe, 19-25. 
 
 Conscience, 137-38. 
 
 Conscious action, 291-93. 
 
 Constitution: Hamilton on, 416-20; 
 Henry on, 353-55. 
 
 Convention: opening of, 415 ; speeches 
 in, 415-24. 
 
 Conversation, as a factor in acquir- 
 ing special material, 320. 
 
 Corax, 85-86. 
 
 Criticism of other speakers, 13-14. 
 
 Cuban Problem, argument on, 237- 
 39. 
 
 Culture, importance of, 314-15. 
 
 Curran, J. P., 43, 97-99. 
 
 Curtis, George William, 430. 
 
 Declaration of Independence, Adam.s" 
 supposed speech on, 299-300. 
 
 Deduction, 260-69. 
 
 Definition of terms in a speech. 60. 
 
 Demosthenes. 10 8-9. 
 
 Digestion, 401-2. 
 
 Discrimination between concepts. 
 220-21. 
 
 Distractions: to audience, 339-40; to 
 speaker, 337. 
 
 Drinking, 406-7. 
 
 Earnestness, 136-37. 
 
 Effectiveness : defined, 1-2 ; how at- 
 tained, 3-4. 
 
 Efficiency, 1-2. 
 
 Emotion, its effect on the voice, 366- 
 69. 
 
 Eulogy: biographical, 443-52; of A. 
 G. Compton bv Burchard, 444-51 ; 
 of Clav bv Lincoln, 11-12 ; of O'Con- 
 nell bv Phillips, 90 ; of Sumner by 
 Schurz. 69-73. 
 
 Everett. Edward, 53, 154, 174-76. 
 
 Exercises for gestures, 383-97. 
 
 Exordium, 86. 
 
 Facts, 239-47. 
 
 Feeling in the audience, 31-46, 67, 
 
 78-79. 
 Feet, position of, 107-9. 
 Flexibility in posture, 114-15. 
 Floor tactics. 284-85, 358. 
 Force, 373-75. 
 Fox, Charles, 421. 
 Franklin, Benjamin, 408. 
 Friendline.ss, 132-33. 
 
 465 
 
466 
 
 INDEX 
 
 Gambling-, Beecher on, 179-80. 
 
 Garfleld, James A., 32-38, 180, 336. 
 
 General ideas, 211-2.5. 
 
 Generalization, 251-60. 
 
 Gestures, 381-97; automatic, 33.'): 
 conti'ol of, 4 : voluntary and in- 
 voluntary, 381-83. 
 
 Grady, Henry W., 9, .52, 95-96. 
 
 Grant, U. S., 19-25. 
 
 Grattan, Henry, 423-24. 
 
 Greece, Henry Clay on, 301-2. 
 
 Habitual attention, 330-31. 
 Hamilton, Alexander, 416-20. 
 Hancock, John, 42. 
 Hands, use of, 385-97. 
 Hav, John, 43-44, 432-36. 
 Heni'y, Patrick, 2, 52-53, 91, 353-55. 
 Home rule in Ireland, 23 5-37. 
 Hostility in the audience, 32, 39-41. 
 Hugo, Victor, 50-51, 154-55. 
 Hygiene, 138 ; 399-408. 
 
 Ideas: organization of. 4-15, 17-29: 
 should be developed one at a time, 
 10-12. 
 
 Idiomotor acts, 295. 
 
 Imagery, 151-67, 171-82. 
 
 Imagination, 151-67, 171-82. 
 
 Impulsive acts, 298-302. 
 
 Inaugural address, 452-54. 
 
 Indifference in the audience, 41—44. 
 
 Induction, 251-60. 
 
 Ingersoll. Robert, 161-62, 181. 
 
 Interest in the audience, 49-54. 
 
 Interests of speaker, 331-33. 
 
 Introduction of a speech, 18, 31-61, 
 275-77. 
 
 Involuntary attention, 330. 
 
 Jesus as a public speaker, 188-89. 
 'Key-note speech," 413-15. 
 
 Language, mastery of, 4. See also 
 
 Vocabulary-building. 
 Lincoln, Abraham, 11-12, 266-67, 352- 
 
 53, 367-68, 452-53. 
 
 O'Connell, Daniel, 90, 454-63. 
 
 Old South Church, Phillips on, 349-51. 
 
 Omar Khayyam, Hay on, 43-44, 
 
 432-34. 
 Opening Address, 427-30. 
 Opinions, how built up, 230-37. 
 Order of material, 68-81. 177. 
 Organization of ideas, 4-15, 17-29. 
 
 Paul, the apostle, 219. 
 
 Pauses, 372-73. 
 
 Perkins, George W., 257-58. 
 
 Peroration, 87, 92-99. 
 
 Persisting stimulus, 305-6. 
 
 Personality, 129-39. 
 
 Personal research as a factor in ac- 
 quiring special material, 319-20. 
 
 Philippines, brief on the retention of, 
 278-82. 
 
 Phillips. Wendell, 90-91. 349-51. 
 
 Phonation, 404-5. 
 
 Physical aspects of delivery, 105-24. 
 
 Pitch, 375-78. 
 
 Place as a basis of order, 73-74. 
 
 Plan of a speech, 17-29. 
 
 Posture, 106-15, 334. 
 
 Practice, importance of, 3-4, 14-15. 
 See also Preparation. 
 
 Preparation, importance of, 141-42. 
 
 Pi-eparation of material, 311-23. 
 
 Proem, 85-86. 
 
 Promise of gain, 52-54, 329. 
 
 Pronunciation, automatic, 335. 
 
 Proposition, 274-75. 
 
 Purpose of a speech, 60-61, 345-60. 
 
 Quintilian, 183. 
 
 Reading, 185-87, 320-22. 
 Reciprocity with Canada, speech on, 
 
 54-58. 
 Reflection hour, 146-47. 
 Reflex action. 294. 
 Repeal of the Union, O'Connell on, 
 
 456-63. 
 Research. 319-323. 
 Rest, 403-4. 
 
 Retention of ideas, 4, 318. 
 Robespierre, 51. 
 Root, Elihu, 96-9 7. 
 
 Magnetism, 130-39, 296-97. 
 
 Magnitude as a basis of order, 7 4-7. 
 
 Mass action. 297-98. 
 
 Material, preparation of, 311-23. 
 
 Meeting, how to call, 411. 
 
 Mills, Dr., 407. 
 
 Modesty, 41-4 4. 
 
 Mouth hygiene, 407-8. 
 
 Miinsterberg, Hugo, 229. 
 
 Napoleon, Ingersoll on. 162. 
 Nervousness, 123-24. 
 New South. Grady on. 9. 
 Nominating speech, organization of, 
 
 17-29. 
 Nomination: of Grant by Conkling, 
 
 19-25 ; of Sherman by Garfield, 32- 
 
 38. 
 Note-taking, as a factor in acquiring 
 
 special material, 320, 322. 
 
 Schurz, Carl. 69-73, 92-93. 
 
 Selective action, 303-6. 
 
 Self-control, 144-45. 
 
 Senses in imagery, 163-67. 
 
 Sense-training, 315-16. 
 
 Sherman, John, 32-38. 
 
 Shock to the audience, 50-52, 329. 
 
 Sincerity, 42-44. 
 
 Slavery. Beecher on. 39-40. 130-31. 
 216-18. 
 
 Smoking. 406. 
 
 Speakers, criticism of. 13-14. 
 
 Speeches for special occasions, direc- 
 tions for, 411-63. 
 
 Speed in delivery, 369-73. 
 
 Subjective aspects of delivery. 129- 
 47. 
 
 Suggestive use of words, 181-82. 
 
 Summary, 88-91, 100-101. 
 
 Sumner, Charles: Bullock on, 428- 
 29 ; eulogy of by Schurz, 69-73. 
 
INDEX 
 
 467 
 
 SvUogisms, 261-69. 
 Sympathy, 133-36. 
 
 Voice, 363-78 ; control of, 4. 
 Voluntary attention, 330, 333-34. 
 
 Tact, 145-46. 
 
 Tariff, Perkins on, 257-58. 
 Thurston, John M., 292-93. 
 Toastmaster, duties of, 429-30. 
 Tone, variations of, 363. 
 Trunk, posture of, 111-12. 
 
 Unconscious action, 293-96. 
 Understanding in the audience, 
 61, 77-78. 
 
 Vocabulary, automatic use of. 
 
 Vocabulary-building-, 183- 
 Vocational talks, 438-40. 
 
 Warren, Jo.seph, 261-65. 
 Washington, Booker T., 43. 
 Washington, George, 12-13. 
 Webster, Daniel, 93-95, 158, 163, 2 
 
 300, 319, 370-71. 
 Weight of body, 109-10, 396. 
 Wiley, Dr. Harvey W., 258-60. 
 Wilson, Woodrow, 14, 266. 
 Wirt, William, 312-13. 
 Witnesses, 240-46. 
 Women, Hay's speech on, 434-36. 
 Word-analysis, 193-209. 
 Word-painting, 151-58, 171-82. 
 Words, supply of, 182-90, 193-20^ 
 
 Zones of attention, 329-31, 333. 
 
14 DAY USE 
 
 RETURN TO DESK FROM WHICH BORROWED 
 
 LOAN DEPT. 
 
 This book is due on the last date stamped below, or 
 
 on the date to which renewed. 
 
 Renewed books are subjea to immediate recall. 
 
 ^Auir^.n^Tf^ 
 
 
 
 
 HEC'D i*^ 
 
 
 JUL iib 1960 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 LD 21A-50m-4,'60 , 7„ •^■"'*' fr 'i'HI • 
 CA95628l0)476B ^•"'"'KL^^*'"'" 
 
m^-. 
 
 .^/ 
 
 K ^ ^ 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY