6
3
4
I
I
THE LIBRARY
OF
THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES
BRIDGPAVATER LIBRARY
THE
HISTORY
O F
FRANCE,
From the Time the
French Monarchy was Eftablifh'd in Gaul,
TO THE
Death of LEWIS the Fourteenth.
Written Originally in F R tf c H by Father
DAN IE L) of the Society of JESUS, and
now Tranflated into ENGLISH.
ID F I V E VOLUME S,
VOL. I.
LO N D O y<
Printed forG.SrRAHAN, at the Golden Ball over againft
the Royal-Exchange^ W. MEARS at the Lamb, and
D.BROWNE at the Black Swan without Temple-Bar,
and J. WOODMAN and D. LyoN in Ruffel- Street
IvLDCC.JvXVi.
, H
T O THE
KING.
SIR,
AVING had the honour to
dedicate my hiflory of France
to your auguftpredeceflbr, it
was a (iifficient warrant for me
to addrefi this new work to him, which is
A z but
DEDICATION.
but an abridgment of the former, and
what the publick have demanded of me
for their ufe and benefit. But provi-
dence, for the good of his people, hav-
ing lengthened the days of this great
Prince to an age, to which none of our
Kings ever attain'd before him, wou'd
not permit this kingdom to enjoy any
longer the pofleffion of fuch a happi-
nefs, but took him from us after a reign
of feventy three years, which was it-
felf too fbon, if our prayers or wifhes
cou'd have taken place , and by this means
I have been deprived of the fatisfadioa
of tendering him this new fruit of my
labour, and offering him this farther tef-
timony of my veneration for him, and
my gratitude for the princely favours
with which he has condefcended to ho-
nour me.
As you. Sir, polfefs the throne and
place
DEDICATION.
place of this incomparable King, who
excelled in all kinds of merit, and al-
ready carry a perfedrefemblanceof him
in thofe royal endowments which are
every day more vifible and con/picuous
in you, I prefume to beg your permit-
{ion for fupplying the want of his name,
by placing yours at the head of this
work, and to intreat your acceptance
of this new homage which was defign'd
for h.'m. I believe I may venture to
depend upon YOUR MAJ E s T Y 's
gracious allowance in this particular;
from the favourable hearing YOUR
MAJESTY gave me when 1 took the
liberty two years fince to offer you the
hiftory of the French Militia^ as well as
from the dignity of the fubjecl: matter
of this performance, which I know
will be agreeable to you, as it exhibits
the virtues YOUR MAJ E s T Y already
pofTefles in a very finiflied and perfect
A 3 manner.
DEDICATION.
manner. At leaft I fliall have the {a-
tisfadion of teflifying to the world ,
that I am with the mod profound re^
and the utmoft fubmiflion.
YOUR MAJESTY'S
Mojt humble, mofl obedient,
mofl loyal fubj eft and few ant,
-
Gabriel Daniel,
Of the Society of Jefus.
THE
THE
PREFACE.
\BRIDGMENTS of tiftori-
cal futyefts have met 'with
approbation in all times and
among all nations^ wherever
learning has flourijhed. From the little
that is remaining of the Greeks and La-
tins in this kind, it abundantly af fears
that they mujl have heen as much in fa-
jhion among them, as they have heen for
an age (aft among us y efpecially with re-
gard to the hi/lory of France.
the
PREFACE.
The advantage of finding all our mat-
ters ready order d and diffofed to our
hands, makes us eafily yield to the temp-
tation of becoming authors in this refpecJ,
where all our trouble feems to lie within
the Jhort comfafs of abbreviating and mak-
ing a choice of the mojl important facts.
The Jlothfulnefs of readers, who are
frightned at the Jight of a large volume,
how eager foever they may be not t oaf fear
altcgether ignorant in the hijtory of their
country, has in a great meafure contributed
to this cuftom. Eefides abbreviators have
very much promoted the de/ign of giving chil-
dren feme /mattering of hiftory, and have
carried their zeal and afflication to fucha
length in this particular, as to reduce it
into the form of a catechifm, by way of
quejlion and anjwer, that they might have
the benefit of learning by heart, as foon
as they were able to fpeak, what by all
other
PREFACE.
other methods of mfiruHion woud he per-
feffly forgotten, 'when they came to riper
years, and 'were able to make fome ufe of
it. sifter all I don t fee any thingworthy
of blame in itj it is hut loft time 'which
coud not he hetter employed.
This impatience of readers, 'who con-
tent themfelves 'with a fuperfcial know-
ledge of matters they woud he ajhamd
to he wholly ignorant of, prevailed upon
Mezeray to- abridge his own work. He
is the firjl Author of our general Hijlory,
that I know of, who has taken the pains
to abridge himfelf. I have been perfuad-
o J J L J
ed to do the fame upon the preparing a
new edition of my hijlory of France.
But tho I have followed MezerayV
example, I have not confirid myfelf to his
method, hut have abridged my hijlory af-
ter a very different manner, as I now
offer it to the pubUck. I have
PREFACE:
I have not contented my f elf with a lore
and often incoherent mention of faffs ,
which cannot he long read without diffi-
culty and trouble. I considered that a
hijlory abridged is itfelf an hiftory, and
hy consequence ought to contain all that
is ejjential to fuch a work, and as much
of the agreeable as it will admit of. Such,
for example, is that of Juftin, the beft
model we have among the ancients, in
his epitome of the univerfal hijlory of Tro
gus Pompeii^ which is loft.
Iprofofe therefore to give here an abridg-
ment, but fuch a one, wherein the faffs
are connected together, and the prepara-
tory incidents relating to them are obferv-
ed, wherein the chief characters are de-
fcribed, the different interejis laid open,
the mofl important negotiations fufficient-
ly touch d upon, the Jignal events propor-
tionably particular ixd, and the faring and
principle
PREFACE.
principle of action discovered and laid be-
fore the reader, fo as to give him an idea
of the government of this monarchy, of
the manners of the nation, and of the dif-
ferent alterations they have undergone from
time to time j the knowledge of which is
the principal ufe and advantage ofhiftory.
In a word, this work is itfelf ahiftory,and
not a copious Index* of a large hiftory, like
the abridgments which I havefeen, of the
firft and fecond race of our Kings, for I
muft confefs I have not taken the pains to
read thofe of the third race.
The three volumes in folio of t
edition, and thofe in quarto of the two fol-
lowing, are reduced to feven volumes in
twelves in this abridgment, to which are
added tine annals of Lewis xiu.andxiv.
'which make two more volumes in twelves.
It is proper to inform the reader with
regard to thefe annals, that being pul-
lified
PREFACE.
Ttjhei with the author Jay dangerously
illy and not in a condition to revife them,
fame confiderahle faults efcaped the frefi,
effecially in the beginning of the reign of
the two Kings y 'which) as well as fame
others, are corrected in this edition.
THE
(I )
An Hiftorical
PREFACE
T O TH E
Hiftoryof FRANCE.
IH AV E never been fond of paradoxes in hiftory ;
but I think new thoughts, which fometimes oo
cur to us in the courfe of our reflections upon
antient authors, may be propofed, when we rind
them well fupported. Thofe which I have laid
down in this Hiftorical Preface appear to me to be
fuch, and to deferve fome attention. I (hall divide it
into three parts ; in the rirft of which I (hall treat of
the foundation of the French monarchy in Gaul, that
being a preliminary eilential to my hiftory : for as I
maintain, contrary to the opinion of all our hiftorians,
that it was Clovis that founded the French empire on
this fide the Rhine, and laid the eftablifhment of the
nation, and that all his predeceffbrs had been conti-
nually driven from Gaul by the Romans, I can't dif-
penfe with my felf from giving an account of the
teafons which have determin'd me to go out of the
ordinary road in this point) and to commence the hi-
ftory of France at Clovis.
In the lecond partlfhall confider another fact, which
preceded the foundation of the monarchy in Gaul, fup-
pofing that fact to be true, and which all our hiitorians
have look'd upon as fuch; I mean t!,e depofition of
King Childeric, father of Clovh, and the election of
Count G/'/M, General of the Roman army, to the throne
by tteFrankr: but I hope to .nuke it appear, that this
epifode, which we have inserted in our hiftory, is a
nicer fable.
Vo L. I. B
An htftoricalTreface to
Laftly, in the third part I (hall propofe an important
queftion, viz. Whether the French empire, as foon as
it was cftablifh'd in Gaul, was an Hereditary Conftitu-
tion, and not Ele&ive ? I (hall (hew that it was He-
reditary, and not Elective under the firft race; that it
was alter'd m this refpe& under the fecond, but be-
came Hereditary again under the third ; and by con-
fequence the right of fucceflion, which the defcen-
dants ot Hugh Capet have for almoft theie eight centu-
ries enjoy'd, is as antient as the eftablifhment of the
monarchy in GauL ,
ARTICLE I.
Of the founder of the French monarchy in
Gaul.
TO fpeak immediately to the point; I call him the
. founder of the French monarchy in Gaul, who (b
eftablifti'd himfelf there, as not to be driven thence by
the Romans, but has kept poflfeflion of his conquefts till
this time, and left 'em as an inheritance to his pofteri-
ty. A few of our hiftorians have afcrib'd the glory of
this work to Phara-mond. None of thofe who wrote
fomeages after Gregory of Tour s andFredegarius, make
any fcruple to give his fucceifor Clodlon the honour of
it. All the fncceeding hiftorians Ipealc ofMerovee and
Childeric as of two Princes already eftablifli'd in Gaul,
who only enlarged the limits of the kingdom of
France, and our moderns have blindly followed them.
I believe I am able to (hew, that none of thefe Kings
before Clovis remain'd in pofTeffion of any part of that
which is at prefent call'd the kingdom of France, and
that Clovis was not only the firft Chriftian King of the
French, but alfo the firft King of the French in Gaul.
This is what I hope to make appear at leaft very pro-
bable, by the ftri&eft rules of cnticifm, to thofe who
(hall read without prejudice what I have Ciid upon this
fubje6t.
1 prove my propofition, firft, from the (Hence of
contemporary authors, or fuch as are very near fo,
who treat of the eftablifliment of this new conftirution
in Gaul before Clovis: fecondly,from diverfe teftimo-
3 nies
the Hiftory 0/ FRANCE.
hies of the fame authors, who manifeftly fuppofc the
contrary of that which is now become infenfibly the
univerfal opinion, and which I take upon me to op-
pofe : and laftly, from the character of thofe writers
who in the following ages have publifti'd a fa& of this
importance, which no body ever mention'd before
them.
Neither Proffer, nor Bifhop Uac ius, nordpollinaris)
nor Procopius, nor Gregory of Tours, nor Fredegarius,
norMarius of Laufane, nor any other of the antients
fay any thing of a new government founded m^Gaul
by Pharamond, Clodion, Merovee, or Childeric. A ne-
gative argument of this nature, confifting of fo large
an induction, is of great force in a matter of hilto-
ry, when there is nothing to oppofe to it but the au-
thority of fome writers, who wrote three or four hun-
dred years after the time of the faft in difpute, and
which we need only read, to be perfuaded that the
authors of it fpoke without any judgment or regard to
truth ; but this laft circumilance ihall be proved in its
proper place : the reft of the propofition will remain
firm, till fomething is produc'd to difprove it, which
Jam pretty confident will never be done. But the re-
flections which I have made upon the nature of the
fat in queftion, ought, I conceive, to weigh very much
with all impartial judges.
For what is it we are here difputing about ? A king-
dom that reach'd from the Rhine at leaft to the river
Somme, ( fome make it extend as far as the Seine, and
others to the Loire) a frate govern'd fucceffively for a-
bove fixty years by four Princes, who were all He- PharamonJ,
roes, had numerous and formidable armies, befieged
and took confiderable towns, gain'd battles, and were
the terror of the Romans, from whofe hands they re-
fcued this great country. But fince the hiftory of the
empire, which relates fo many other lefs confiderable
facts in an hundred places, takes no notice of any fuch
divifion of the empire, as this ; fince thofe authors of
different nations, who have written the hiftory or chro-
nicles of thefe fixty years, do no where fpeak of the
rife and eftablifhment of this new kingdom in the
midft of the Imperial territories, the (lory is far from
being probable.
B ?, A?
An hiftorical ^Preface to
As foon as the Vijigoths were fettled on this fide the
Loire i and the Burgundians in the cities of Roan and
Scion, all the contemporary writers, as well Romans as
Gauls, do upon a thoufand occafions make mention
of the kingdom of the Vifigoths, and of the kingdom of
Burgundy in Gaul ; even that of the Suevi is not omitted
upon a Spanijb coin ; but there is not one word of
that of the French on this fide the Rhine to be met
with till the time of Clovis : their irruptions into Gaul
are frequently obferv'd, but there is nothing faid of
their eftabliflimcnt before the reign of this Prince. Is
it pofiible now for us to make this reflexion, without
being convinced that this ftate, of which they are en-
tirely filent, was not then in being, and that if it had
been governed by Kings of that character, by which
they defcribe Clodian, Merovee, and Childeric, there
would moft certainly have occurr'd frequent mention
of it during the fbace of more, than fifty years that it
continued under their jurifdich'on ?
As foon as Clovis enter'd into Gaul, we find him
making alliances by marriage, and entring into treaties
of confederacy, as well with \heBurgundians as the
Goths. Thefe treaties are mentioned in the hiftories of
thofe nations, by the writers of the empire, and by
ihofe of Gaul:, but there is not the leaft account of
any fuch thing being done by Pharamond, Clodion,
Merovce y or Childeric. How is this to be accounted
for?
The famous Sidonius dpollinaris, in a great number
of letters and poems, which we have of his compofi-
tion, .touches upon the molt confiderable events of his
time. He fpeaks of the affairs and wars of the Goths
and Burgundians, from that time fettled in Gatfl, of
their Kings and their battles, and takes notice of the
excurfions the French made from time to time in paf-
fing the Rhine, and the reprifals of the Romans upon
them on the other fide this river ; but does not fay one
word of this pretended kingdom, fo large already and
flourifhing, if we may believe our hiftorians of the fol-
k)wing ages. This brave Merovee, who befieged and
took Paris, and gain'd fo many other conquefts, who
was the love and admiration of his people, is the only
perfon to whofe memory Afollinaris has not thought
proper to confecratc one verfe, nor fay one word of
him.
the Hi/lory of FRANCE;
him. No Roman or Gaulijh Captain has fignalized
himfelf either in the overthrow of him, or at leaft in
making a ftand againrt him, nor given this poet, who
wrote upon all forts of fubje&s, and to all perfons
of diftm&ion in his time, any occafion to make the
leaft allufion to the victories or defeats of this Prince,
nor to this new irate, fituated in one of the beautiful-
left parts of Gaul. But let us proceed gradually, and
from this negative argument I have been deducing, let
us pafs on to another of greater weight and impor-
tance.
Proffer, in his chronicle, defcribes the country where An
Pharamond, Clodion, and Merovee reign'd ; and he de- &
fcribes it in fuch a manner as to leave no ground
fcruple to any one, who is not dilpofed to cavil in a
matter of that concern we are now difcourfing of. In
the twenty ikth year of Honor ius, fays he, Pkaramond
reigns in France ; Pharamundus regnat in Francia. The
fifth year of Theodofius the younger, Clodicn reigns in
France ; Clodius regnat in Francia. The twenty fifth
year of the fame Emperor, Merovee reigns in France ;
Meroveus regnat in Francia. There being but fewZ, rr 1 i -JL f
co. add what Gregory ot Tours has omitted, that Aetius
t in chro- General of the Roman army, under whom Majoranus
nico> - then ferv'd, defeated Clodion, and rccover'd from him
all that he had taken from the Roman empire on this
fide the Rhine. ParsGallidrum, fays Profper, propin-
cjua Rhenv, quam Franc t pojfidendam occ up aver ant, Aetij
Comitis armis recepta, Cajfiod'jrus&ys the fame in his
chronicle,
Aetitts
the Hiftory ^FRANCE. 7
Aetiiis gain'd this victory when Felix and Taurut
were Confuls, that is, in the year of our Lord 428,
and the firft of the reign of Clodion. So that this
Prince began his reign at this conqueft, but hardly en-
joy'd it many months. Bifhop Idadus fays moreover, in chronko.
that Aetius having defeated the French, granted them
peace ; Superatis per Aetium in certamine Francis, &
in pace fufceptis.
Now whether ApolKnaris^ Idadus, and Proffer fpeak
of the fame, or of feveral different expeditions, is a
matter of no great importance ; becaufe which fide fo-
ever we take in this particular, Clodion is always re-
prefented as defeated and conquer'd, and defiring peace.
Upon what pretence then do they contend, that Clo-
dion eftablifh'd himfelF a kingdom in Gaul*. All our
French hiftorians have depended folely upon Gregory of
T'ours's laying, that the King made himfelf mailer of
Cambray and the circumjacent country. He does not
fay that he continued there ; and contemporary authors
expreflly affirm, that, he was driven from thence. In
the mean time, upon the authority of thefe words a-
lone, A don, above four hundred years after Profper,
and near three hundred after Gregory of 'fours, makes
Cambray the capital of the kingdom of Clodion. The
Monk Rorigon, whofe fabulous and chimerical hifto-
ry, as well as the ftile in which it is written, Ipeaks
him to be a very trifling and frivolous author, has
thought proper to make him hold his court at Amiens.
But Marianus Scotus, Monk of the Abbey of Fulde in
Germany, fpeaking of Clodion above fix centuries after
his death, is yet much more liberal towards him; for
he makes one part of that which we now call Hol-
land fubject to his empire, and all thofe beautiful and *
fruitful provinces which extend themfelves from thence
unto the river Loire, the banks of which he fixes for
the borders of his kingdom*. The greateft part of
our modern hiftorians, being impatient of feeing a
French monarch reign on this fide the Rhine, have
given into thefe accounts, fome more, Ibme lefs, and
have made no fcruple to acknowledge Clodion for the
* Thus the printed copies of Marian*!. But Valejitu, in his additions
to the third tome of the hiftory of France, fays, Ifaac VcJJlut had in his
pofleffion an antient manufcripc of this author, which does not at all men-
tion che victories of Clediun,
B 4 founder
s r An hiftorical Treface to
founder of the French monarchy in Gaul, upon what
grounds we now fee. Let us go on to Merovee.
I have already faid, that Merovee never reign'd on
this fide theRhive. No author has any where fpoken
of his entrance into Gal, to fix himfelf there ; and all
that our French hiftorians have laid of him in this re-
fpet goes upon their falfe fcheme of the eftabltfhment
of Clodiou.
If Merovee had reign'd on this fide the Rhine, and
his realm had been border'd by \.\\c Loire, theSV/W, or
the Som-me, would not Gregory of fours have been bet-
ter acquainted with his fubjecl, than he feems to have
been ? for he fays nothing more of him, than that
fome affirm he was of the family of Clodion ; de hnjus
fiirpe quidam Meroveum regera fttijje adferunt. Moft
of them pretend, that he Beaded the French in Aetius's
army, in that famous and bloody battle which this Ro-
man General, then in alliance with the Goths and the
other barbarians, gain'd over Attila. It is not to be
queftion'd but there was fome French King at that bat*
* L. i! c . 7. tie, Gregory of Tours fays fo exprelfly. * Prifcus, fur-
Hiftor. By- nam'd the Rhetor, reckons, that one of the reafons
which determin'd Attila to turn his arms to the Welt,
was the death of the Fre nch King, whofe two fons dif-
puted with each other the poflefiion of their father's
kingdom ; that the eldeft call'd in the help of Attila,
and the youngcft put himfelf under the protection of the
Romans ; that he himfelf had feen him at Rome, from
whence the Emperor had fent for this young Prince,
loadcn with prefents and honours, and that Aetius him-
felf had adopted him. This relation, naming neither
the one nor the other of thefe two Princes, Ihould
keep us from deciding, as almoft all our hiftorians
have done, that which they could not be inform'd of
elfewhere, whether it was Merovee that was in Aetius's
army, or his brother who dilputed the kingdom with
him,or whether Mero-vee might not be a third rival,who
ravifh'd the crown from the two fous of Clodion. For
jnoft of the antients fay, that Merovee was not the foil
of Clodion; and it appears very probable that he was
the founder of this new line, which we call the Kings
of the firll race, and that for this very reafon it was
jjam'd the Merovingian race.
Be
theHiflory /FRANCE.
Be th