/ 
 
 
 
 
 V 
 
 > 
 
 c 
 
 5 
 
 
 V I 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 
 ( 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 Z 
 
 
 
 
 K 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 >^ 
 
 Du 
 
 
 
 
 or 
 
 
 :^ 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 J 
 
 <; 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 ^« 
 
 
 
 3 s 
 
 fe> 
 
 
 
 
 * 
 
 o 
 
 V ^! 
 
 1 
 
 
 w 
 
 CO 
 
 >- 
 
 
 [ 
 
 
 q: 
 
 W 
 
 > 
 
 Re ceil' 
 Accessions No. 
 
 ! 
 
 
 9 
 
 
 .3*' 
 
 V 
 
 \. 
 
 ri)^ 
 
 
 
 f 
 
i^ 
 
NEW RELIGIOUS BOOKS, FOR GENERAL READING 
 
 J. & J. HARPER, NEW-YORK, 
 
 HAVE NOW IN THE COURSE OF REPUBLICATION, 
 THE 
 
 THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY. 
 
 THIS PITBLICATION WILL BB COMPRISED IN A LIMITED NUMBER OF 
 
 VOLUMES, AND IS INTENDED TO FORM, WHEN COMPLETED, 
 
 A DIGESTED SYSTEM OF RELIGIOUS AND 
 
 ECCLESIASTICAL KNOWLEDGE. 
 
 THE FIRST NUMBER (NOW PUBLISHED) CONTAINS 
 
 THE LIFE OF WICLIF. 
 
 BY CHARLES WEBB LE BAS, M.A. 
 
 Professor in the East India College, Herts ; and late Fellow of Trinity 
 College, Cambridge. 
 
 IN ONE VOLUME. EMBELLISHED WITH ▲ PORTRAIT OF WICLIF, 
 
 VOLUMES IN PREPARATION. 
 
 THE CONSISTENCY OF THE WHOLE SCHEME OF REVELA- 
 TION WITH ITSELF, AND WITH HUMAN REASON. 
 By p. N. Shuttleworth, D.D. 
 arden of New College, Oxford. (In Press.) 
 
 HISTORY OF THE INQUISITION. 
 
 By Joseph Blanco White, M.A 
 
 Of the University of Oxford. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE PRINCIPAL COUNCIL'S. 
 
 By J. H. Newman, M.A. 
 
 Fellow of Oriel College, Oxfwd. 
 
THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY (continued). 
 THE LIVES OF THE CONTINENTAL REFORMERS 
 
 No. I. LIFE OF MARTIN LUTHBR. 
 
 Bv HroH James Rosie, B.D. 
 
 Christian Advocate in the University of Cambridge. 
 
 THE LATER DAYS OF THE JEWISH POLITY: 
 
 With a copious Introduction and Notes (chiefly derived from the Tal- 
 
 mudists and Rabbinical Writers). With a view to illustrate 
 
 the Language, the Manners, and general Ilistorv 
 
 cf the Nkw Testament. 
 
 By TtJOMAs Mitchell, Esq. A.M. 
 
 Late Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge 
 
 HISTORY OF THE CHURCH IN IRELAND. 
 
 Bv C. R. Elringtov, D.U. 
 
 Regius Professor of Divinity m the University of Dublin. 
 
 THE DIVINE ORIGIN OF THE CHRISTIAN REVELATION 
 
 demonstrated in an analytical Inquiry into the Evidence on which the 
 
 Belief of Christianity has been established. 
 
 By William Rowe LvAf.i , M.A. 
 
 Archdeacon of Colchester, and Rector of Fairstead and Weeley in Essex. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE REFORMED RELIGION IN FRANCE. 
 
 By Edward Smkbi.ey, M.A. 
 
 Late Fellow of Sidney Susisex College, Cambridge. 
 
 ILLUSTRATIONS OF EASTERN MANNERS, SCRIPTURAL 
 
 PHRASEOLOGY, &c. 
 
 Bv Samhkl Lkk, B.D. F.R.S. M.R.A.S. 
 
 Regius Professor of Hebrew in the University of Cambridge. 
 
 HISTORY OF SECTS. 
 
 Bv F. E. Thompson, M.A. 
 Perpetual Curate of Brentford. 
 
 SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF LITURGIES: 
 
 comprising a Particular Account of the Liturgy of the Church of 
 England. 
 By Hknry John Rosk, B.D. 
 Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge 
 
 HISTORY OF THE CHURCH IN SCOTLAND. 
 
 By Mii;hael Russell, LL.D. 
 Author of the " Connexion of Sacred and Profane History 
 
 THE LIFE OF GROTIUS. 
 
 By James Nichols, F.S.A. 
 
 Author of Arminianism and CalvinisT Ci^cuiuired.'' 
 
Harper^s Stereotype Edition, 
 
 CONSISTENCY 
 
 OF 
 
 THE WHOLE SCHEME 
 OF 
 
 REYELATION 
 
 WITH 
 ITSELF AND WITH 
 
 HUMANr REASON. 
 
 PHILIP NICHOLAS Sl^UTTLEWORTH, D.D. 
 
 Warden of New College, Oxford, and Rector of Foxley, Wilto. 
 
 NEW-YORK : 
 PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY J. & J. HARPER, 
 
 NO. 82 CLIFF-STREET, 
 
 AND SOLD BY THE PRINCIPAL BOOKSELLERS THROUQHOUT 
 THE UNITED STATES. 
 
 niff^ 
 
 O^ THB 
 
 [XJNIV^ESITYJ 
 

 I 
 
SEEPAGE. 
 
 9 
 The object of the following dissertation is to do 
 
 justice to the internal evidences of Christianity, 
 by disencumbering them of the weight of that class 
 of objections which, though in popular discussion 
 generally considered as affecting the cause of reve- 
 lation exclusively, stand in reality in no need of 
 refutation, for the plain and simple reason that 
 they are applicable in exactly the same degree to 
 every possible modification of religion whatever. 
 There is certainly much confusion of idea dis- 
 played in the mode by which skeptics for the most 
 part make their assaults upon the credibility of 
 revelation. Of the arguments alleged by them, 
 far the greater proportion will usually be found to 
 militate against principles already admitted by 
 themselves, while almost all of them consist of 
 isolated and desultory attacks upon some detached 
 point of belief, rarely, if ever, at the same time 
 taking an enlarged and impartial survey of the 
 antagonist difficulties which attach to the opposite 
 view of the same question. It is obvious, how- 
 ever, to every person who has paid the slightest 
 attention to the topics of theology, that objections 
 which, when considered separately, appear per- 
 fectly unanswerable, may often lose the greater 
 A3 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 part of their power of embarrassment when taken 
 as integral portions of a complex system, and even, 
 when viewed as a counterpoise to other proposi- 
 tions not less formidable, may contribute rather to 
 the removal than the suggestion of doubt. Natu- 
 ral no less than revealed religion, in fact, consists 
 of a mass of startling problems, each of which in- 
 dividually appears pregnant with insuperable diffi- 
 culty, and yet between the counteracting forces of 
 which our faith, whether as philosophical theists 
 or as devout Christians, must be content to pre- 
 serve its balance. Nothing, accordingly, is so easy 
 of achievement as the task undertaken by the in- 
 fidel, provided his object be to become the assail- 
 ant. He has only to limit the discussion to one 
 single view of a necessarily complex subject, and 
 the perplexities which immediately suggest them- 
 selves will, of course, so long as we confine our- 
 selves to the same restricted mode of defence, 
 exceed our means of disentanglement. The ob- 
 vious and, indeed, the only remedy for this species 
 of misapprehension, to which the natmal indolence 
 and the less venial passions of mankind too easily 
 dispose them, is that of acquiring, as much as 
 possible, the habit of looking upon the subject- 
 matter of our religious belief as an entire and con- 
 nected whole ; and of considering no one propo- 
 sition which it seems to involve as altogether in- 
 admissible until we have cautiously balanced it 
 against that contradictory dogma which, in case 
 of its rejection, we shall be obliged to substitute 
 in its place. It is surely, however, no breach of 
 charity to assert that the skeptical disputant against 
 revelation rarely, if ever, proceeds to this length ; 
 
PREFACE. T 
 
 ^nd yet, until he has done so, it is certain that he 
 has not given the grand question which he takes 
 upon himself to determine the consideration which 
 it deserves, and which it is fairly, in strict reason- 
 ing, capable of receiving. The object aimed at 
 in the ensuing • pages is, to expose the fallacy 
 involved in this mode of argument. In so short 
 a work, an attempt to give a general and con- 
 nected view of the internal evidences of our faith 
 must necessarily confine itself to the discussion of 
 the more general and prominent topics. It will, 
 however, answer its purpose, if, by affording to the 
 reader a comprehensive sketch of the main out- 
 line, it induces him to fill up the detail by pur- 
 suing that train of thought which the contempla- 
 tion of so interesting a subject cannot fail to sug- 
 gest. Even the most firmly-grounded faith in 
 this life being established rather upon a balance 
 between conflicting difficulties than upon positive 
 demonstration, it follows, that the wider we make 
 our intellectual range in examining the general 
 system of Providence, the more we become famil- 
 iarized with those astounding facts which form the 
 basis of every possible theological theory, and the 
 less we are in consequence disposed to be offended 
 with what we find to be rather the result of an 
 incurable defect in our own intellectual apprehen- 
 sions than a substantial refutation of our religious 
 creed. It is thus that in proportion as we advance 
 in practical knowledge, the more we perceive the 
 wisdom of that submission of the understanding in 
 certain cases, the idea of which is so offensive to 
 every beginner in the study of theology, but of 
 which no person who, by laborious experience, 
 
8 PREFACE. 
 
 has learned the necessity of walking by faith will 
 be ashamed to make his profession. Certain, at 
 all events, it is, that the denial of Christianity 
 affords no escape whatever from most of the diffi- 
 culties with which, in the hasty judgment of man- 
 kind, it stands almost exclusively charged. To 
 every mind endued with the vital feeling of religion 
 sufficient evidtnce has been afforded by the mercy 
 of the Creator for every purpose of effective moral 
 probation, however inadequate it may be for the 
 gratification of mere curiosity : but the insatiable 
 spirit of skepticism, if it will pursue its course 
 rigorously and consistently to the last, has in 
 strictness no assignable resting-place or limit short 
 of the hopeless extreme of atheism itself. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER L 
 
 The Sentiments of Religion natural to the human Heart— -The natu- 
 ral Reason unequal to the Investigation of remote religious 
 Truth — A Revelation is therefore necessary — The authenticity 
 of any presumed Revelation to be determined Ufwn according to 
 external and internal Evidence— Christianity the only System of 
 religious Belief which is supported by any substantial Weight of 
 Proof W 
 
 CHAPTER n. 
 
 Of the Prejudices commonly entertained by Men of the World 
 against ReYelation tS 
 
 CHAPTER m 
 
 Of the Difficulties which attach in common to natural, no less than 
 revealed Religion; and of those which belong exclusively to 
 Christianity 38 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 Of the Necessity, as demonstrated by experience, of the Existence 
 of a written Revelation of the Divine Will 36 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 Of the Mosaic History of the Creation 43 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 Of the Longevity of the antediluvian Generations 50 
 
 CHAPTER Vn. 
 Orthe Fall of our first Parents 51 
 
 CHAPTER Vni. 
 Of the History of the general Deluge, and the ConAisioo of Tongues 69 
 
10 CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 Bage 
 Of the internal Probability of the peculiar Revelation of the Divine 
 Will contained in tlie Je';vish Scriptures, and of the moral Ten- 
 dency of that Revelation 70 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 Of the moral Tendency of the Levitical Institutions 86 
 
 CHAPTER XI. 
 Of the miraculous Incidents recorded by Moses 98 
 
 CHAPTER XII. 
 
 Of the internal Evidence of the Authenticity of the Books of Moses, 
 and of the other Jewish Scriptures 108 
 
 CHAPTER Xin. 
 
 Of the intenial Evidence of the Authenticity of the historical Books 
 of the Old Testament subsequent to Moses 120 
 
 CHAPTER XIV. 
 The same Subject continued 127 
 
 CHAPTER XV. 
 
 Further Observations upon the moral Tendency of the Levitical 
 Institutions 131 
 
 CHAPTER XVI. 
 
 Of the Evidence afforded to the Authenticity of the Levitical Insti- 
 tutions by the onerous Nature of its Ritual, and the present State 
 of the Jewish People 144 
 
 CHAPTER XVII. 
 Of the Tendency of the prophetic Books of the Old Testament. ... 150 
 
 CIUPTER xvin. 
 
 Consistency between the Covenant of Moses and that of Christ, as 
 having an Expiation for Sin as their leading Object — The Leviti- 
 cal Expiations were confessedly ineffectual — It must be pre- 
 sumed, therefore, that the great Purpose of the Gospel Dispensa- 
 tion was to correct this Deficiency — The popular Objections to 
 the Doctrine of Ctirist's Atonement examined 160 
 
 CHAPTER XIX. 
 Of the Divinity of Christ 184 
 
CONTENTS. 11 
 
 CHAPTER XX. 
 
 Of Sdnotification by the Holy Spirit. 
 
 .% 
 
 CHAPTER XXI. 
 
 Of the practical Tendency of the Morality of the Gospel, and of the 
 extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Spirit 199 
 
 CHAPTER XXn. 
 
 Recapitulation of some of the foregoing Observations — The Scrip- 
 tural Doctrine of the Divinity of the Holy Spirit 204 
 
 CHAPTER XXm. 
 Of the Holy Trinity 208 
 
 CHAPTER XXIV. 
 Of the practical Tendency of the Christian Virtue of " Faith" 213 
 
 CHAPTER XXV. 
 Of ecclesiastical Authority anil Ordinances 218 
 
 CHAPTER XXVI. 
 Of the Miracles recorded in the New Testament 225 
 
 CHAPTER XXVII. 
 
 The Evidence of the Truth of Revelation afforded by the low Con- 
 dition in Life, the absence of literary Acquirements, and the Im- 
 possibility of Confederacy in its respective Promulgators 239 
 
 CHAPTER XXVIII. 
 Conclusion 214 
 
THE 
 
 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 WITH 
 
 HUMAN REASON. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 2%e sentiments of Religion natural to the human heart— TVie Na^ 
 tural Reason unequal to the Investigation of remote Religious 
 Truth — A Revelation is therefore necessary— The authenticity of 
 any presumed Revelation to be determined upon according to 
 external and internal Evidence — Christianity the only system of 
 Religious Belief which is supported by any substantial weight of 
 procf. 
 
 All modifications of religious belief are, or at least 
 profess to be, solutions, so far as our means of informa- 
 tion extend, of the apparent anomalies discernible in 
 the works of Divine Providence, As, then, that reli- 
 gion can only be the true one which really accords 
 with those acknowledged facts in the physical and 
 moral universe, which are established by positive 
 experiment, it necessarily follows, that the true course 
 for arriving at a correct system of belief, is that of 
 studying our own nature carefully and impartially 
 under every possible aspect ; of ascertaining its real 
 and most prominent wants, and of determining which 
 of the many theories offered to its choice, most satis- 
 factorily accounts for the numerous perplexing cir- 
 cumstances which the most cursory survey cannot 
 fail to recognise in the existing order of nature. The 
 Christian dispensation will, we conceive, be found 
 upon inquiry, to be the one which best — it would, in 
 fact, be no exaggeration to say, which exclusively— r 
 2 
 
14 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 answers to this test ; and to show that it does so, 
 will be the object of the following observations. The 
 question thus proposed for discussion is one of experi- 
 ment, in the strictest meaning of the term ; the basis 
 of the argument being not what a speculative imagin- 
 ation might suppose the constitution of the universe 
 to have been, had God so willed it, but what it actu- 
 ally and demonstrably is. The conclusion at which, 
 of course, we hope to arrive, will be, that upon that 
 practical basis no consistent system of theological 
 belief can be erected, excepting that for the possession 
 of which we are indebted to the Jewish and Christian 
 Scriptures. If those remote and mysterious conclu- 
 sions, which we derive from that Divine source, are 
 found strictly to harmonize in all their parts with the 
 facts previously established by the native faculties of 
 our minds, the probability in favour of its presumed 
 authenticity is at once established :— if every other 
 possible attempt at explication is found, upon examin- 
 ation, either to mis-state the primary truths of the con- 
 stitution of nature, or to fail in accounting for any of 
 its startling anomalies, the probability thus assumed 
 will amount to little short of certainty. Such is the 
 position which we trust that the Christian Revelation 
 will be found to occupy, if impartially examined, in 
 the first place, as a system of doctrines consistent 
 with itself, and with the acknowledged course of 
 nature ; and, secondly, when contrasted with those 
 various theories which have, from time to time, been 
 urged by ingenious men in opposition to it. The 
 question, we repeat, is one of strict experiment ; and 
 being such, we shall commence our observations by 
 advancing such assertions only as probably no reli- 
 gionists of whatever denomination will hesitate in 
 admitting. 
 
 No one fact, then, connected with the circumstances 
 of human nature would seem to be more completely 
 established by experience than that contained in the 
 Scriptural aphorism, that the heart of man is evil 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 15 
 
 from his youth. This evil tendency is conspicuous, 
 not merely in the gross vices and ferocious habits of 
 the savage, or in the unsubdued passions of the com- 
 paratively ignorant members of more civilized com- 
 munities, but under every, the most plausible modi- 
 fication of society in its highest state of artificial 
 refinement. The same selfishness of motive, the 
 same worldliness of feeling, the same concentration 
 of the thoughts upon the trifling interests of sensual 
 gratifications of the present moment, with a reckless 
 indifference for the higher principles of morals, how- 
 ever disguised by the conventional decencies of society, 
 characterize our species to the last, wherever the 
 strong external stimulant of religion is wanting. 
 
 Yet, though such are the ordinary habits of our 
 nature when left to itself, nothing, on the other hand, 
 is more certain, than that the principle of religious 
 feeling is also natural to man, and suggests to him 
 one of his most prominent wants. Let his attention 
 once be diverted from its usual channel by some strong 
 moral excitement — let sickness or sorrow dissipate 
 for a moment the illusions of the bodily senses, — or 
 the intellectual powers, whether from curiosity or 
 some worthier motive, seriously occupy themselves 
 in the examination of the great questions connected 
 with our first origin, and with our ultimate destina- 
 tion, and a reverential feeling of devotion, accom- 
 panied by a consciousness of his own responsible 
 position, takes possession of him as a matter of course. 
 That the sentiment thus roused is not the production 
 of mere ignorance and superstition, is evident from 
 the circumstance that the accutest understandings 
 and the most exquisitely attempered dispositions are 
 most disposed to its influence. We have only to feel 
 it in order to be unanswerably convinced of its Divine 
 origin. The sensations thus excited are experimen- 
 tally the noblest and the purest of any that we are 
 conscious of possessing. The uniform mode of their 
 operation, in every variety of the human mind, is 
 
16 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 again another prpof that they derive their origin from 
 the regular course of our natural constitution, and not 
 from the desultory suggestions of caprice. That, for 
 instance, the examination of the wonderful structure 
 of the universe leads us necessarily, by a direct and 
 unanswerable chain of inference, to the theory of an 
 intelligent and self-existent First Cause ; that a like 
 examination of our own intellectual operations and 
 perceptions leads us as necessarily to conclusions 
 favourable to the doctrine of the immateriality,* and, 
 therefore, probable immortality of the thinking prin- 
 ciple within us, and that the feeling which we denomi- 
 nate conscience, will, in exact proportion to the de- 
 gree in which we cultivate it, create a still increasing 
 
 * Every judgment which we can possibly form, after a careful examin- 
 ation of the operation of our minds, leads us to conclusions, perfectly 
 irreconcilable with the supposition of the soul's materiality. Not one 
 of the many phenomena of matter with which we are acquainted has the 
 slightest resemblance to those of thought and consciousness. But the 
 objection to the materialist theory does not terminate here. Admitting, 
 what it would be a mere gratuitous assumption to admit, that sensa- 
 tion might possibly be the result of mere corporeal organization, we 
 should still find ourselves unable to account for that conviction of our own 
 singleness and individuality which accompanies every exertion of our 
 thoughts. Why, we should still ask, if the soul is but an assemblage of 
 divisible parts mechanically adjusted, has not every sensory organ a dis- 
 tinct and peculiar consciousness exclusively and incommunicably its 
 own? What is the one indivisible entity which presides over the whole ; 
 which takes cognizance of, and pronounces judgment u{x>n, the various 
 animal and intellectual perceptions, and refers them all to itself? " Se 
 in un popoloo in un esercito," says Francesco Soave, "un sente fame, 
 uno sete, e questi ha caldo, e quel freddo, ed altri ha dolore in una mano, 
 altri inun piede o nel petto o nel capo, chi dira mai che il popolo o I'esercito 
 tanto insieme sia consapevole delle sensazioni che ha separatamente 
 ciascuno individuol 
 
 " Ne si pretenda che il paragone non valga, perch^ ogn' uomo e qui 
 eeparato da ogn' altro. Imperocche nel cervello ancora, e in qualunque 
 Esser composto, ogni minima parte ha un' esistenza cosi sua propria, e 
 distinta, e separata d' ogni altra, come qualunque uomo in un popolo o in 
 un' esercito 
 
 " Per qualunque verso dunque si prenda un Esser composto, e o si 
 consider! nel suo tutto, o nelle sue parti, h sempre assolutamente impos- 
 Bibile, ch' ei sia consapevole a se stesso di piu sensazioni e percezioni 
 eimultanee. E poichg noi di queste simultanee sensazioni e percezioni 
 a noi medesimi siam consapevoli realmente, ne vien d' assoluta necessity, 
 che oltre alia sostanza composta e materiale che forma il corpo, in noi 
 debba esistere un' altra sostanza diversa affatto da quella, ciog, non com- 
 posta, ma pura, unica, semplice, Indivisibile, che e quella che chiaraiamo 
 auimn o spirito." 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 17 
 
 ■susceptibility of moral apprehensions, and a conse- 
 quent conviction of the imputability of our actions, 
 are propositions, the truth of which it is impossible 
 to deny. Man, therefore, may be said to possess two 
 directly opposite characters, each of them in a cer- 
 tain sense equally natural : the one, that which exists 
 of itself, prior to any regular system of moral culti- 
 vation, and which is almost exclusively swayed by 
 animal instinct : the other, that which only waits to 
 be called forth by habits of discipline, and which is 
 sure to manifest itself the moment that circumstances 
 become favourable for its developement. Now, there 
 assuredly can be no doubt which of these two dissim- 
 ilar states is most worthy of our approbation, and 
 most accordant with the presumed wisdom of Him 
 who placed us in our present condition. The highest 
 possible elevation to which we can attain under the 
 former, is that of apparently inoffensive, and, perhaps, 
 not altogether unserviceable, members of society, con- 
 cealing the real selfishness of our disposition by the 
 conventional laws of decorum, and subduing our 
 natural ferocity by a sense of its inexpediency, but 
 with a strict limitation of all our hopes and fears 
 within the narrow limits of human life : whilst under 
 the latter, not only every external action, but also 
 every internal thought, is restrained by an efficient 
 control, and, instead of merely temporal and inferior 
 motives of conduct, others of a most vivid and un- 
 earthly character are substituted, ample in their scale 
 and character as eternity itself. 
 
 Still, however, whilst such is the general capability 
 of religious impression which we derive from our 
 natural constitution, it by no means follows from any 
 necessary deductions of our reasoning powers, what 
 ought to be the peculiar form and modification of that 
 system of belief which alone deserves to fall under 
 the high designation of true religion. That which 
 has reference to the system of the whole universe and 
 to the essential attributes of the Almighty mind itself^ is 
 2* 
 
18 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 obviously incapable of being measured by the mere hu- 
 man intellect, taking for its rule and standard the few 
 facts supplied by its very limited experience in this 
 world. We may follow up inference after inference, 
 cautiously deducing remoter and less palpable truths 
 from those primary ones, which are more immediately 
 the result of our personal experience. But the in- 
 quiry very soon leads us beyond the utmost verge of 
 legitimate human knowledge. We feel, indeed, with 
 the most unhesitating certainty, that the stake of our 
 happiness is in some way or other interwoven with 
 those undeveloped mysteries which we strive to pene- 
 trate, but we are acquainted with no natural instru- 
 ments by which we can arrive at them. A powerful 
 instinct urges us forward, but our bewildered reason 
 strives in vain to keep pace with it. A correct sys- 
 tem of religion again, having, as was just now ob- 
 served, reference to the real circumstances of nature, 
 it follows as a matter of course, that some one modi- 
 fication of doctrine must be not only superior to all 
 others, but, as truth is self-consistent and immutable, 
 must be exclusive of all others : that is to say, it must 
 be true, and all the rest, so far as they do not consti- 
 tute an integral portion of it, must be necessarily 
 false. But how are we to arrive at the knowledge 
 what that one and exclusive modification of religion is? 
 This is an inquiry in which, indeed, our natural 
 intellectual powers must take their share, as even our 
 most vague conjectures must depend upon our reason- 
 ing faculties, in the last resort, for whatever degree 
 of probability they may possess ; but still it is per- 
 fectly vain for us to hope that the area of our spiritual 
 apprehensions can be widely extended by any talent 
 of discovery vested in the human mind itself. Mean- 
 while it is impossible to infer that God has given us 
 the need of religious sentiment, and yet denied to us 
 the means of gratification. Grant the existence of 
 the instinct, and the analogy of nature will assure us 
 that it was imparted for some definite end and object. 
 
WITH HITMAN REASON. 19 
 
 Admitting, then, as two concurrent truths, the fact 
 of the necessity of religion to the human heart, with 
 that of the insufficiency of the human understanding 
 for its effectual acquisition, and we are driven, almost 
 of necessity, to the inference, that the wisdom and 
 goodness of our Maker would provide in some mode 
 or other for supplying the defect. It would seem, 
 then, that a communication from heaven, so far from 
 being intrinsically improbable, is, on the contrary, 
 what we might appear to have strong a priori reason 
 for expecting from the mercy of Providence; whilst 
 all that, under such circumstances, would remain for 
 our intellectual powers to perform in their own proper 
 department, would be to judge of the evidence of such 
 revelation as that now supposed, by the same rules 
 of probability derived from their really accessible 
 means of knowledge, which they would apply to every 
 other case of external testimony. This is undoubt- 
 edly the course of proceeding which the theory of 
 Christianity requires at our hand ; and it would be 
 difficult to show that, all the circumstances of our 
 nature considered, the demand which it thus makes 
 upon our obedience and belief, is repugnant to the 
 dictates of sound reason. 
 
 It appears then, if the foregoing propositions are 
 correct, that the idea of the one true religion neces- 
 sarily involves that of " an express revelation from 
 heaven ;" no natural operation of the mind of man 
 being capable of making him acquainted with those 
 phenomena of the invisible universe in which, not- 
 withstanding, he has a decided interest; whilst the 
 facts thus revealed, being many of them obviously 
 beyond the compass of the human faculties to appre- 
 ciate, are capable of being rendered objects of sub- 
 stantial belief, not by their own objective clearness, 
 but only by the " evidence'^ with which they may be 
 accompanied. One standard, indeed, our minds un- 
 doubtedly possess, which is and ought to be available 
 even in the transcendental dogmas of revelation, that 
 
20 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 is to say, our moral sense, such as we have every 
 reason to believe that it has been implanted within 
 us by our Maker. No religion, under any external 
 weight of testimony whatever, can be admitted as the 
 true one, the principles of which are unequivocally op*- 
 posed to that faculty. Many revealed dogmas might, 
 and undoubtedly Avould, be found above its apprehen- 
 sion and that of our intellectual powers, but none would 
 be directly hostile to it. With this single exception 
 then — an exception, which, after all, we must have 
 recourse to only with extreme caution — we must be 
 prepared to receive that one system of religious 
 belief which we acknowledge as authentic, in the 
 form of an external communication, and not of any 
 discovery made by our own reasoning powers ; whilst 
 the evidence which will command our assent to it, 
 will be of that peculiar description which our limited 
 faculties are best able to apprehend, namely, the 
 accordance of the presumed revelation with the ac- 
 knowledged constitution and necessities of our own 
 nature, the dignity and worthiness of its object, its 
 internal consistency with itself as a whole and in all 
 its parts, and the confirmatory attestation of those 
 persons whose actual position as eye-witnesses, and 
 the known integrity of whose characters, put their 
 assertions beyond the reach of suspicion. 
 
 Admitting, then, that there exists somewhere an 
 authentic revelation of the Divine will (and if we 
 deny that fact we deny every one of the foregoing 
 propositions,) the question to be resolved is simply 
 this, " which of all the modes of opinion which have 
 assumed the name, is that revelation ?" Now it is 
 certainly not assuming too much, to assert that 
 Christianity alone has the slightest claim to that 
 character. The various religious opinions of man- 
 kind are matters of history. The events which first 
 suggested the leading and peculiar principle of each, 
 which fostered their growth, and gave them that hold 
 upon the minds of their supporters which in their 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 21 
 
 several degrees they have respectively possessed, are 
 all such as may be readily accounted for by consider- 
 ing the peculiar habits of the societies in which they 
 severally arose, the worldly interests or national pre- 
 dilections which they served to cherish, the then ex- 
 isting state of comparative ignorance or literature, 
 and often the mistaken theories respecting the struc- 
 ture of the material universe, which subsequent dis- 
 coveries in science have effectually overthrown. Such 
 is undoubtedly the case with every modification of 
 religious belief with which we are acquainted, Chris- 
 tianity alone excepted. Every distinguishing charac- 
 teristic, on the contrary, of this latter religion, is 
 marked with peculiarities preeminently its own. It 
 is referrible to no natural causes with which we are 
 acquainted. Its first appearance was like that of a 
 comet entering our planetary system. We can 
 neither surmise from whence it comes, nor speculate 
 upon the far remote regions with which its destinies 
 are connected ; but we look up to it with awe, and, 
 in spite of our ignorance, feel a satisfied assurance 
 that its operations are among those which are under 
 the superintendence of infinite Wisdom. That, so 
 far from having the way prepared for it by the previous 
 habits of society, or by its accordance with human 
 notions and passions, it, on the contrary, made its 
 way in direct opposition to national prejudices, phi- 
 losophical theories, and above all, to the natural 
 sensuality and self-love of the human heart : — that it 
 professed to be supported by the most miraculous 
 deviations from the ordinary course of events, and yet 
 gained implicit credit from persons who could have no 
 interest in professing their belief in it if they knew it 
 to be false, and who, had it been false, had undoubt- 
 edly the means of its refutation in their own hands : — 
 that commencing from apparently the humblest of 
 all humble beginnings, possessed of no temporal 
 authority, and arrayed in none of our earthly notions 
 of " beauty that we should desire it," it, notwithstand- 
 
2S CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 ing, spread rapidly over the whole civilized world, 
 and impressed an entirely new character upon human 
 society : — that during the space of eighteen centuries 
 it has sustained every shock which the violence of its 
 persecutors, the calumnies and arguments of its most 
 inveterate opponents, or the vices and superstitions 
 of its less informed followers could inflict upon it, 
 and that, at this moment, it stands entire ; assented 
 to in all points by a vast number of men of the most 
 enlightened minds, and by none more than by those 
 who have most sedulously examined its evidences : — 
 that, be it true, or be it false, it is an undoubted fact, 
 that the most valuable members of society, the most 
 perfect specimens of the human race, have been those 
 who have made its doctrines their rule of faith, its 
 injunctions the guide of their practice : — all these are 
 points which the Christian believer may unhesitat- 
 ingly assert as incontrovertible truths, and which, per- 
 haps, few professed sceptics would have the hardi- 
 hood to controvert. Why, then, having succeeded 
 thus far, has it not done still more ? To what are 
 we to attribute the slowness with which, in latter 
 times, this singular religion has made and continues 
 to make its way through the world ? Why, at every 
 step of its progress, is it opposed and impeded, not 
 merely by the violence of those passions which it is 
 its professed object to eradicate or control, but occa- 
 sionally also by the more plausible hostility of men 
 of seeming candour, of great literary acquirements, 
 and of apparently sound morals ? 
 
 This is a question which it is natural to put, and to 
 which it may appear difficult to return a satisfactory 
 answer. That men of enlightened minds should 
 despise a sensual, and detest a selfish or cruel code of 
 religion, seems natural and just. But that they should 
 assume a degree of merit in traducing the most single- 
 minded and self-denying of all practical rules of con- 
 duct, and that they should coalesce for the purpose of 
 bringing into disrepute the only seemingly well au- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 28i 
 
 thenticated revelation from heaven which would raise 
 us above the earth, and hold out the prospect of a happy 
 immortality, is a phenomenon which appears at first 
 sight perfectly inexplicable. To discuss this subject, 
 and to show that the blame is not justly attributable 
 to any want of reasonableness in the religion itself, 
 will be the object of the following remarks. Perhaps 
 it may appear in the sequel, that this very species of 
 hostility which Christianity has met with, is to be 
 considered among the strongest proofs of its unearthly 
 origin. Most assuredly it is the very kind of recep- 
 tion which Scripture has expressly declared that it 
 would receive from the passions and prejudices of 
 mankind. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 Of the Prejudices commonly entertained by Men of the World 
 against Revelation. 
 
 It is not necessary, in order to account for the rejec- 
 tion of Christianity by many persons of otherwise 
 cultivated minds, and by a very considerable portion 
 of mere men of the world, to suppose that they are 
 conscious to themselves of any calculated motives 
 of hostility, or any unusual laxity of morals. It 
 is enough that we know from Scripture and from 
 experience, that the natural heart of man is prone to 
 self-indulgence ; and as such is averse from the labour 
 of a painful investigation of abstract and mysterious 
 subjects, especially where the remuneration of that 
 labour is professedly not immediate, but the deferred 
 and uncertain allotment of a future state of existence. 
 The instinctive wants of the body are immediate in 
 their demands upon our attention, and are clamorous 
 if neglected; they require no painful tension of the 
 understanding to perceive their object, nor any great 
 
24 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 ingenuity to attain to their gratification. There i» 
 an obvious and palpable connexion of cause and 
 effect between the pursuit of the thing sought for, 
 the acquisition of it, and the enjoyment resulting 
 from its possession. And what is thus true of our 
 corporeal pleasures, taken in their lowest stage, is 
 still no less true of them in their highest, however 
 plausibly they may be disguised by the refinements 
 of civilization, and even elevated by their association 
 with philosophy and science. Immediate fruition in 
 some shape or other, is equally the aim of all. To 
 persons in this disposition of mind, religion, with 
 Its long catalogue of abstruse propositions, of thin 
 abstractions, of immediate privations, and deferred 
 retributions, necessarily comes as an unwelcome 
 intruder. It never can be the case that they should 
 turn willingly from pursuits at once so apparently 
 natural and so attractive, to the impalpable and 
 obscure speculations of theology, more especially 
 when, in addition to the more vivid impression made 
 upon the imagination by temporal objects, and the 
 indolence which shuns all presumed unnecessary 
 inquiry, the heavy price is to be paid of a self- 
 denial, not only in the case of confessedly degrading 
 pleasures, but in that also of those which the 
 generality of mankind deem perfectly inoffensive- 
 This observation, it is true, seems to apply rather ta 
 the study of religion in general than to that of the 
 Christian revelation exclusively* But it should be 
 remembered, that if we once give up the theory of a 
 direct revelation, and leave each person to the peculiar 
 creed suggested by his own moral sense, every man's 
 religious speculations become, from that moment^ 
 rather a matter of amusement than of painful coercion* 
 The ingenuity of self-love will invariably, in such 
 circumstances, adapt its speculations to its own tastes 
 and predilections, and will as assuredly contrive to 
 suggest some excuse for the indulgence of the pas- 
 sions as the pure code of Christianity is inflexible in 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 26 
 
 restraining them. The real feeling of repugnance 
 begins then, and then only, when, instead of pursuing 
 our own visionary caprices, and misnaming them 
 religion, we are peremptorily required to adopt a 
 system of belief external to ourselves in its origin, 
 uncompromising in its injunctions, and unearthly in 
 its remunerations. There is a point of repulsion at 
 the very outset, in this latter case, which discourages 
 any mutual attempt at approximation in notions and 
 feelings thus little in unison. It matters not by what 
 weight of external or internal evidence such a creed 
 may chance to be supported, or how perfectly accord- 
 ant its data may be with the ultimate conclusions of 
 sound philosophy. In a case of this description the 
 average of worldly men make their election, not from 
 deep and painful calculation, but from the impulse of 
 the moment; and, having once taken their station 
 with this or that party, seek to tranquillize their 
 consciences and lull their fears, by occupying a kind 
 of neutral ground between vague admissions and 
 practical unbelief; while those of more courage, or 
 more acute talents, take the bolder step of becoming 
 at once the assailants, and attacking the credibility 
 of the doctrines, the obligations of which they would 
 evade. 
 
 Nothing can be more obvious than that any reli- 
 gion, however true, and even in a certain sense demon- 
 strably such, would have little chance of making 
 very numerous converts, if examined only in the 
 perfunctory and prejudiced manner now described. 
 Few truths are so attractive at their first aspect as 
 they appear eventually upon further discussion ; and 
 of all truths, those of theology are the least so. From 
 first to last it involves a tissue of seeming paradoxes, 
 into the admission of which we are eventually driven, 
 not so much from the light by which they are them- 
 selves surrounded, as by the anomalies, the contra- 
 dictions, the impossibilities, the total degradation of 
 our best and noblest feelings, which would be the 
 3 
 
26 CONSISTENCY OF KEVELATION 
 
 necessary consequence of their rejection. "We cannot, 
 therefore, be surprised that truths of this kind, if 
 injudiciously stated, or indolently discussed, must 
 often fail of carrying conviction ! Nothing can be 
 easier thaa to make out a plausible case against 
 isolated portions of an intricate and mysterious theory 
 with auditors who, even if they possess natural talent 
 sufficient for the purpose, have, at all events, never 
 taken the trouble to examine its consistency as a 
 whole, and in the minds of a greater part of whom 
 a bias in the opposite direction may, without any 
 breach of charity, be presumed to exist : nor need we 
 accordingly be surprised, however we may be grieved, 
 to see a laugh raised against the supposed weakness 
 and superstition of speculative men by persons who 
 have never been taught to acknowledge any higher 
 standard of morals than that of social expediency, or 
 any wish beyond that of the gratification of the selfish 
 passions of pleasure, avarice, or ambition. 
 
 Such, however, is infidelity under its most common 
 aspect. In this deplorable stage of it, the first attempt 
 at cure must be made by the application of moral 
 rather than of intellectual medicines. The very 
 simplest effort of the attention is wanting, and that 
 is to be roused by alarming the fears and appealing 
 to the consciences of the respective parties before we 
 can have any chance of success from argumentative 
 discussion. It is, therefore, to unbelief of a higher 
 and more intellectual order that any more elaborate 
 exposition of the Christian evidences, as establishing 
 the reasonableness and consistency of revelation, 
 must be addressed. Now common candour obliges 
 us to admit, that acute reasoners, and humanly 
 speaking, amiable men, have undoubtedly existed 
 from time to time, who, having as they thought 
 impartially examined the arguments for and against 
 Christianity, have decided upon unbelief as the least 
 difficulty 01 the two; and who, without entertaining 
 any violent hostility against it as a system of opinions, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 27 
 
 have still asserted the incurable ignorance of the 
 human mind upon those mysterious topics, and jus- 
 tified, accordingly, their unwillingness to inquire 
 further by the assumption that all inquiry is mani- 
 festly useless. In order, therefore, to meet opponents 
 of this description, it may be desirable to examine 
 how far their peculiar class of objections weigh 
 against the doctrines of Christianity exclusively, 
 considering them, as in fact they are, a superaddition 
 to the fundamental principles of natural religion ; or, 
 on the other hand, how far they may be equally 
 valid against every modification of religion whatever. 
 Should the latter appear to be the case, it would 
 follow, either that their argument involves a fallacy, 
 as attributing exclusively to the revelation of Jesus 
 Christ an objection which applies equally elsewhere, 
 or it would prove more than themselves intend, by 
 showing that religion of every description, that of 
 pure unmixed theism not excepted, is a sentiment 
 alien to our nature. Few professed infidels, who 
 have not discarded all the restraints of conscience, 
 would, perhaps, be hardy enough to venture this 
 latter assertion. Yet scarcely any of them have had 
 the candour and good sense to remark, that by far the 
 greater number of attacks, which they profess to 
 direct solely against Christianity, strike directly, if 
 any where, at the basis of all religion whatever. This 
 confusion of ideas it is necessary to point out and 
 correct, if we would discuss the peculiar evidences 
 and merits of the Gospel accurately and fairly. 
 
CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 Of the difficulties which attach in common tc Natural, no less than 
 Revealed Religion; and of those which belong exclusively to 
 Christianity. 
 
 Christianity, then, may be contemplated in two 
 distinct points of view, both of them in their respec- 
 tive sense equally correct. It may be considered as a 
 whole and entire system of theology, having natural 
 theology for its basis, and revelation for its crown 
 and capital ; or it may be viewed in the light of a 
 corrective of the apparent anomalies, and as explana- 
 tory of the many difficulties, which perplex every, 
 the most rational theory of belief, in the absence of a 
 distinct revelation. According to the former mode of 
 seeing it, natural religion will seem to be concurrent 
 with it, and to constitute an integral portion of it ; 
 whilst, according to the latter, it will in some measure 
 be opposed to it. This distinction, we repeat, has 
 not been sufficiently remarked by those persons who 
 have assailed the doctrines of the Gospel. Professing 
 themselves to be sincere Theists, they have still 
 directed their assault so vaguely and indiscriminately 
 as to cut away from under their own feet the very 
 support upon which they have taken their stand. 
 That religion, including under that term the essential 
 doctrine of an all-wise and all-benevolent Ruler of 
 the universe, and of the soul's immortality, is natural 
 to cultivated and civilized man, they assert no less 
 confidently than ourselves. But though it is easy to 
 make this admission, and to fancy that we cordially 
 assent to it, it is by no means easy to anticipate all 
 the remote and perplexing inferences, which, if traced 
 systematically, step by step, necessarily result from it. 
 Those two main principles once granted, almost 
 every difficulty, which has been invidiously alleged 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 29 
 
 as specially impugning the theory of the Gospel, 
 immediately assails the consistent Deist in the very 
 commencement of his inquiry. The beautiful me- 
 chanism of the universe evidently announces the 
 existence of an intelligent and benevolent Author. 
 Yet whence did that Almighty Author derive his own 
 eternal existence ? Until the rational Theist can see 
 his way through this primary difficulty, it is in vain 
 that he argues against the assumed improbability of 
 those facts superadded by revelation to the no less 
 inexplicable religion of nature. Suppose this great 
 riddle once satisfactorily solved; another equally 
 perplexing immediately presents itself. He who is 
 confessedly the great Cause, and author of all things, 
 would appear to be necessarily impassive in his 
 nature ; since it seems impossible to suppose that 
 any created object can be endued with such qualities 
 as to react forcibly, and by external agency, upon the 
 volition of its own Creator. Yet once admit this 
 seemingly obvious conclusion, and all those very moral 
 attributes of the Deity, which entitle him to our love 
 and reverence, and which the Theist professes to 
 assert as pertinaciously as the Christian, fall imme- 
 diately to the ground. An impassive and imperturba- 
 ble Supreme Being would, in reality, differ little from 
 the nominal deity of Epicurus. A universe might, 
 according to such an hypothesis, exist, (provided, 
 indeed, that the very supposition of a creation 
 emanating from a Creator thus isolated from external 
 objects, does not involve a contradiction) but the 
 Almighty mind could not, in such a case, be imagined 
 to exercise any moral, and scarcely any physical, 
 superintendence over it. Such a being might be 
 presumed to be necessarily occupied solely in the 
 contemplation of his own infinite perfections, and to 
 be incapable of all sympathy with us and our con- 
 cerns. Yet the doctrine of a Creator, thus indifferent 
 to the welfare of his creatures, is too monstrous to 
 meet with the patronage of any reasonable sceptic. 
 3* 
 
90 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 How then does he make his way through this seem- 
 ingly inexplicable difficulty ? Merely by the fact that, 
 whilst his metaphysical theories suggest one thing, 
 his own moral sense, and all his better and sublimer 
 feelings, inculcate the directly opposite conclusion. 
 
 The sceptic, in the next place, admits the doctrine 
 of the soul's immortality, because without that ad- 
 mission, under the present unequal distribution of 
 worldly prosperity, religion itself were an empty 
 name. Yet press him with the consequences of this 
 assertion, ask him if the souls of the virtuous and the 
 wicked are alike immortal, what must be the distinc- 
 tion between their respective allotments in a future 
 state of existence ? and he shelters himself under the 
 general plea of ignorance ; in other words, he shrinks 
 from following the inquiry into all its consequences, 
 which, if so pursued, would necessarily lead him to 
 some conclusion not very remote from that which he 
 charges as a foremost blemish upon the Gospel. 
 
 Again, the existence of evil in all its forms, whether 
 moral, physical, or intellectual, is an enigma which 
 every Theist is bound to reconcile with his own self- 
 styled rational views of religion, or to confess that the 
 difficulties accompanying any peculiar modification of 
 belief do not necessarily afford a ground for rejecting 
 the evidences upon which it may chance to be built. 
 Whence originates the acknowledged inequality in 
 the dispensation of the good and evil things of this 
 life ? Why did an almighty and all-benevolent Being 
 (for such a Deity he professes to acknowledge) check 
 the operations of his goodness, and deal out happiness 
 in such scanty, pain and imperfection in such ample 
 proportions? Why was the human mind endowed 
 with such gigantic powers of apprehension, such high 
 and indefinite aspirations, whilst the circumstances in 
 which it is placed are such as to cause a vast waste 
 of unemployed faculties, and to suggest little more 
 than abortive schemes for the attainment of what 
 would seem imaginary good ? 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. K 
 
 What, again, does natural religion teach as a solu- 
 tion of that inextricable mystery, the compatibility of 
 free will with the operation of external motives, and 
 of God's foreknowledge, the ineffectual discussion of 
 which has brought unmerited obloquy upon Chris- 
 tianity, as though the difficulty had originated from 
 that source, or that the denial of revelation would 
 contribute any thing towards its removal? 
 
 The rationalist may, indeed, shut his eyes, and 
 choose not to see, or he may otherwise occupy his 
 thoughts and may really be not aware of the dark- 
 ness involved in the foregoing questions, but most 
 certainly that darkness is as old as philosophy itself. 
 If the Christian is more perplexed by discussions of 
 this nature than the mere Theist, it is only because 
 from the tremendous importance of his creed, his 
 mind has been rendered more anxious and contem* 
 plative, that reflection has become a more momentous 
 duty, and the current of his thoughts, in consequence, 
 been more systematically turned in that direction. 
 True, indeed, it is, that the mysteries here alluded to 
 are far from comprehending all that are involved in 
 the admission of the truth of Christianity. All that 
 is now asserted is, that it is both unfair and illogical 
 to lay exclusively to the charge of that peculiar form 
 of belief, perplexities which it shares in common 
 with every other modification of theistical inquiry, 
 and from which the adoption of the gross absurdities 
 and inconsistencies of even Atheism itself would 
 scarcely afford us a shelter. Without, then, pretend- 
 ing to deny that the Gospel revelation has difficulties 
 really and specially its own, we would merely urge 
 that it is those specific and peculiar difficulties, and no 
 other, which suggest a legitimate subject of discussion 
 to the sceptic. By a sober investigation of them, 
 then, let it be tried. The result, we are satisfied, 
 will be, that the additional enigmas which it pro- 
 poses, beyond those attaching to natural religion, are 
 act more in number than might be fairly anticipated 
 
SE CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 from the wider survey of the Divine arrangements 
 which it affords to our minds, and the consequent 
 necessity for the supply of new matter for wonder 
 which this last supposition involves. We may add, 
 also, that if the perplexities which Christianity may 
 thus appear to have superadded to the religion of 
 nature be found, as assuredly many of them will be 
 found, to explain and remove some of those which 
 previously encumbered the principles of Theism ; such 
 explanations ought in fairness to be taken, so far as 
 they may go, as a set-off against the new difficulties 
 thus introduced, and as a diminution of their total 
 amount. This act of justice infidelity will, perhaps, 
 never be found to have voluntarily conceded, but it is 
 obviously claimable upon every sound principle of 
 argument. Let us illustrate this observation by 
 what, we know, occurs every day in the pursuits of 
 experimental philosophy. 
 
 If we might venture to speculate upon what might 
 be presumed a priori to be the probable effect of 
 sudden illumination of the human mind, on the 
 subject of the ^reat principles of religion, we should 
 naturally be disposed to expect a result perfectly 
 analogous with that which we know from experience 
 accompanies every similar enlargement of our appre- 
 hension of the objects of physical science : that is to 
 say, the mind would gain a step in advance, and 
 occupy a wider area of knowledge than before, but 
 at the same time the concurrent effect would be that 
 whilst some preexisting difficulties would be par- 
 tially, and others perhaps satisfactorily, explained, 
 the accumulation of new facts, thus occasioned, would 
 necessarily bring with it an accession of perplexity, 
 of which we were not aware in the earlier stage of 
 our progress. In the present state of the human 
 faculties, one source of doubt is removed only by the 
 inevitable introduction of another. A phenomenon 
 in chymistry or in natural history may be explained 
 by the discovery of some hitherto unknown principle, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 83 
 
 but that fresh discovery, whilst it serves as a key to 
 unlock former subjects of doubt, is itself quite as 
 perplexing as those which it has removed. It is 
 impossible to deny that Newton has truly explained 
 the phenomena of the planetary system, by referring 
 them to the universal law of gravitation. But this 
 discovery has only put us in possession of one link 
 the more in the eternal chain of consequences, so 
 that, instead of asking any longer what it is which 
 retains the heavenly bodies in, and gives re^larity 
 to, their respective courses, our question now is, what 
 is the principle which gives to all matter whatever, 
 its power of mutual and reciprocal attraction. The 
 subject matter of our knoAvledge is increased, but our 
 final ignorance remains the same. Our intellectual 
 horizon shifts as we advance, but the same mass of 
 clouds hangs to the last on its extreme verge. 
 
 With regard, then, to the admitted difficulties of 
 Christianity, it may be confidently asserted, that in 
 this respect the sceptic does not argue the matter 
 fairly. He assumes that a Divine revelation ought 
 necessarily to operate as a universal solution of pre- 
 existing doubt, whereas the infinite and stupendous 
 nature of the problems with which it has to do, and 
 the admitted fact of the very limited faculties of the 
 human mind, ought naturally to have suggested to 
 him the directly opposite conclusion. The idea of a 
 religion without mystery involves, in fact, little less 
 than a contradiction of terms. The science of theo- 
 logy, we repeat, is nothing more or less than that 
 course of inquiry by which, availing ourselves of 
 every clue which Providence has placed in our hands 
 for tne solution of the enigma, we strive to account 
 for the existence of those phenomena in the material 
 and intellectual creation which appear to us at first 
 sight unworthy of the presumed wisdom in which all 
 things, as a whole, are admitted to have been formed. 
 Now if the whole course of this inquiry, from the 
 rery first surmises of human reason to the profoundest 
 
34 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 dogmas of revelation, is necessarily one of embarrass- 
 ment, it is obviously unscientific and unphilosophical 
 to adopt a theory so far only as it embraces the 
 maximum of perplexity, and to become indolent and 
 incredulous at the precise point where something like 
 an explanatory process appears to be commencing. 
 This, however, is really the line pursued by those 
 persons who, having, as they imagine, from convic- 
 tion, admitted the great principles of natural religion, 
 are willing to take their final stand there, and advance 
 no further. To the real consistent Atheist, of course, 
 such arguments as the present do not apply. Con- 
 tradictions and anomalies are the strong holds in 
 which he loves to entrench himself. The more 
 absurdities he imagines that he discovers, the more 
 unassailable his creed becomes. The defect of his 
 theory is, not that seeming oversights are traceable in 
 the established order of things, but that they are not 
 to be found in sufficient quantities to make out his 
 case. But the Theist commits the paralogism of 
 admitting all the difficulties of belief whilst he rejects 
 those antagonist and remedial propositions which 
 would go far to remove them. Take, for instance, the 
 perplexing fact already alluded to, of the existence of 
 evil. Considered as an integral portion of mere 
 rational theology, it presents nothing but unmixed 
 embarrassment. Adopt the solution affi)rded by 
 Christianity, and, though the original question re- 
 mains unanswered, why a wise Providence has not 
 proceeded at once more directly to its object, but has 
 made ignorance and personal suffering a necessary 
 step towards the attainment of ultimate good; still 
 it follows, as a self-evident truth, that if our present 
 life be, as Scripture asserts that it is, a state of pro- 
 bation, the existence of temporary evil is implied as 
 a necessary constituent of the operation intended to 
 be wrought. Thus much, at all events, the original 
 difficulty is diminished. What the sceptic does not, 
 and will not see in this, and in odier similar cases is, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 35 
 
 that the theory of revelation does not pretend to 
 account for those primary facts which are evidently 
 beyond the grasp of our apprehension to embrace, 
 but that it suggests merely a practical rule of life, 
 with a superaddition of fresh subsequent positions 
 which, if we are willing to take the former one for 
 granted, will, in some measure reconcile their con- 
 tradictions, and establish their compatibility with the 
 arrangements of Divine wisdom. 
 
 Considered in this point of view, many circum- 
 stances in the doctrines of the Gospel, which when 
 considered by themselves would present only un- 
 mixed wonder, and which accordingly have ever been 
 prominent marks for the assaults of infidelity, are, in 
 reality, so far from adding to the general mass of 
 improbabilities which meet the theologian in every 
 step of his course, that they leave the general ques- 
 tion far more clear than they found it. To demon- 
 strate this fact, will be the object of the following 
 pages. He assuredly must know, indeed, little of the 
 impenetrable darkness which surrounds us, who 
 would hope in this life to reduce the simplest propo- 
 sitions, even of physical science, much less the tran- 
 scendental dogmas of theology, into the form of self- 
 evident truths. All that any exposition of the Christian 
 evidences can presume to effect, is merely to show 
 that revelation accords, not with our abstract theories 
 and capricious surmises of what we choose to assume 
 that God's creation ought to have been, but with 
 what experience tells us that it actually is. That it 
 does so accord in all points; that the undisguised 
 and unequivocal admission of the actual existence of 
 what we have ventured to call the seeming anomalies 
 in the constitution of the universe is one of its fun- 
 damental propositions, and that without attempting 
 to explain them away, it affords the best solution of 
 the difficulties they suggest, which is to be found in 
 the annals of religious philosophy, is all that we can 
 in fairness be called upon to show. Much, after all, 
 
3Q CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 must be left to that principle of faith which, like its 
 sister virtue, charity towards man, "believeth all 
 things, hopeth all things, endure th all things." But 
 tliat very residue of incurable ignorance, against 
 which in this world we find it fruitless to struggle, is 
 among the strongest pledges afforded us by Provi- 
 dence, that our present allotment is not intended to 
 be final. 
 
 CHAPTEU IV. 
 
 Of the Necessity, as demonstrated hy experience, of the existence of 
 a written Revelation of the Divine Will. 
 
 If, then, the view now taken of the question at 
 issue between the defenders and the assailants of 
 Christianity be correct, it will appear, not only that 
 tiiat sublime theory is not in itself accountable for 
 the facts which experience has shown to form part of 
 the existing order of things, but, on the contrary, that 
 the admitted existence of those facts gives a sunstan- 
 tial probability to that theory, which it would not 
 otherwise possess. That such is the case, will be 
 more clearly shown by considering, separately and 
 distinctly, the several component parts of the Chris- 
 tian system, and showing that, however improbable, 
 a priori and humanly speaking, each of them may 
 appear, when viewed in the form of detached proposi- 
 tions, they present themselves almost in the light of 
 necessary remedial processes, the moment that we 
 consider them with reference to those startling posi- 
 tions of natural religion, the certainty of which, by no 
 subterfuge of the reason, we are capable of evading or 
 denying. To begin, then, with what must at the first 
 point of view be considered as an incident little likely 
 to be expected in the arrangements of Providence, 
 namely, the necessity of the communication of adis- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 37 
 
 tinct written revelation of the Divine will, to crea- 
 tures whom their Maker has already endued with a 
 moral sense and considerable reasoning powers. 
 
 We readily admit, that, were the creation of man 
 still a thing in fiiiuro, such an arrangement as that 
 now contended for might appear to beings, reason- 
 ing as we do, far from probable. Why in the original 
 allotment of the moral faculties of man, Grod chose to 
 leave his work so far imperfect as that it should re- 
 quire a course of subsequent reparation and of special 
 Divine interference for its correction, it is impossible 
 to explain. The question, however, is here not one 
 of argument or of speculation upon presumed possi- 
 bilities, but of fact. We appeal at once to that ano- 
 malous thing, human nature, and deny, because the 
 testimony of history is uniform as to this point, that 
 man, constituted, as we know him to be, can attain 
 to any high degree of moral and spiritual elevation, 
 independently of such adventitious help as that deriv- 
 able from a written communication of the Divine will. 
 The thing has been, as we know, frequently and fairly 
 tried. Nations, under almost every possible modifi- 
 cation of condition, have existed in ignorance of a 
 Divine revelation, and the result has invariably been 
 the same in character, if not exactly so in degree. 
 In many cases man has sunk in real degradation far 
 below the level of the brute creation, and in none has 
 assumed that high moral elevation vvhich is ma-de 
 attainable to us by Christianity. In every such 
 instance the best and noblest powers of the human 
 heart and head have lain dormant, and the grossest 
 principles have constituted the main moving spring 
 of social action ; nor have the actual moral capabilities 
 of our nature been at all apprehended until the pro- 
 mulgation of a positive law, under the most solemn 
 sanctions, and professing to emanate from Divine 
 authority, impressed a new character upon society. 
 Now, it is easy to ask, " why was not man so con- 
 stituted as to begin his course at that advanced stage 
 4 
 
38 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 of improvement to which it is the acknowledged 
 object of revelation eventually to lead him ?" But to 
 this question the mere Deist is as much called upon 
 to return a satisfactory answer as the Christian. Both 
 must alike shelter themselves in their ignorance. 
 The case, however, we repeat, is nevertheless one of 
 acknowledged fact. It has been charged as an im- 
 probability against the Christian system, that the 
 revelation of it was delayed until 4000 years of man's 
 history had passed away : nor do we, any more than 
 in the former case, attempt to give an explanation of 
 this circumstance. One thing, however, has at all 
 events been established by it : that is to say, it has by 
 this means been irrefragably proved, that the highest 
 powers of unassisted human reason are perfectly 
 incapable of making any real discoveries in religion. 
 Had we no other scale by which to estimate the value 
 of revelation, the strange and innumerable modifica- 
 tions of error which prevailed, even in the most highly 
 cultivated nations, during the period of its absence, 
 would effectually supply one. If, however, it be now 
 certain, and certain it appears to be, as infinitely 
 modified experiments can make it, that such is the 
 natural feebleness of the human mental powers, what 
 becomes of the favourite contemptuous argument of 
 the Infidel, which assumes at once the a priori im- 
 probability of any Divine revelation whatever, the 
 object of which should be the correction of those 
 deficiencies ? 
 
 It signifies nothing towards the discussion in ques- 
 tion, whether or not Providence in its wisdom might 
 not have arranged things otherwise. Our reference 
 is to man as we know him to be constituted, and to 
 the existing order of things. To say nothing of the 
 Pagan ages of antiquity, and the moral abominations 
 which pervaded every class of society in the most 
 brilliant days of classic Greece and Italy, let the 
 Infidel explain why at this moment, as we cast our 
 eyes over the different portions of the globe, we find 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 39 
 
 Giiristianity and civilization coextensive ; and why, 
 even among the nations of Christendom, those are 
 confessedly most advanced in all the arts which 
 elevate our nature, whose modification of belief ap- 
 proaches nearest to the primitive purity of the Bible ? 
 Let him show, with such data before him, that the 
 assertion of the special interference of the Deity for 
 the illumination of the human race, involves an 
 absurd or untenable proposition. All that he has 
 shown is, that, were man's nature differently consti- 
 tuted, such external helps might not, perhaps, have 
 been necessary. A conclusion which no believer in 
 revelation will deny, but which proves nothing with 
 respect to the point at issue. 
 
 We will assume, then, as the basis of the following 
 arguments, that an actual revelation of the Divine 
 will cannot, under existing circumstances, be said to 
 be otherwise than probable. But admitting thus 
 much, there is an end of the objection alleged against 
 such an arrangement, from the deviation which it 
 implies from the established order of events. True, 
 indeed, it is, that a distinct revelation, in order to be 
 such, must be supposed to interfere in some degree 
 with the ordinary course of nature. Ends are attain- 
 able only by means ; and the means adopted must, 
 in all cases, have reference to their specific object. 
 A uniform and universal appeal to the moral feel- 
 ings and reasoning powers of the human race, can be 
 made only through the medium of one out of two 
 distinct channels, oral or written communication. 
 The adoption of either course on the present suppo- 
 sition implies a miracle, for the first promulgators of 
 the presumed doctrines, even granting that they avail 
 themselves of merely natural instruments for the de- 
 livery of their message, must of course be themselves 
 specially inspired. To allow, however, the proba- 
 bility of one single miracle in this case, involves 
 effectively the necessity of others. The Providence 
 which once thus specially interferes with mankind, 
 
40 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 must also be presumed to watch over its own arrange- 
 ments, and to secure their adequate operation. It is 
 not necessary to follow the obvious course of this 
 argument into all its branches, to show that the prac- 
 tical form into which every real revelation must event- 
 ually settle, (because that form is the only one which 
 could be equally efficient in all ages, and in every 
 portion of the habitable globe,) is that of written ex- 
 positions of the Divine will, definite in their form, 
 and authoritative in their manner. Oral instruction, 
 in order to be rendered uniform in its doctrines, and 
 universally accessible to ajl conditions of mankind, 
 would require an interminable continuity of miracle, 
 which nothing less than the most inevitable necessity 
 of the case would justify us in expecting. But the 
 promulgation of a written revelation is like the single 
 act of the creation of the universe, a miraculous 
 agency at the moment, but which, having once taken 
 place, leaves subsequent events to pursue their natural 
 and established course. 
 
 If, then, it is not unreasonable to infer that God 
 has, on some occasion or other, communicated his 
 will to mankind, and if among the various professed 
 revelations which have appeared at different periods 
 of man's history, one only has come to us supported 
 by an overpowering weight of evidence, whilst it has 
 at the same time been productive in its effects of a 
 vast, though confessedly incomplete, renovation of the 
 human character, we have undoubtedly the strongest 
 reasons for believing that revelation to be the true 
 one. It is true that many persons may be found who, 
 whilst they assent to the general probability of the 
 fact of a revelation, will find what they imagine to be 
 substantial objections to every religious theory which 
 thus far has assumed that character. But objections 
 of this kind are almost always traceable to the old 
 fallacy, which has just now been alluded to, of dic- 
 tating imaginary schemes of creation to Providence, 
 instead of directing our judgment by what we know 
 

 WITH HUMAN R-RA«dL . .-^ ^ <« . 
 
 to be actually established. "We are all of us unwil?* 
 ling to suppose the interposition of any seeming?^ * 
 
 elaborate means between the enunciation of the 
 Divine will and the attainment of its end. But the 
 great lesson taught us by experience is, that the 
 anticipations of our judgments are ever more hasty 
 than the course of God's proceedings. Why the 
 workings of his providence move thus slowly, and 
 by a thus apparently intricate process of contrivance, 
 we cannot hope to explain, but we are experimentally 
 certain that such is the fact. Those persons, then, 
 who are inclined to believe generally, that' God may, 
 not inconsistently, communicate his will to mankind, 
 and who yet are offended by the specific mode which 
 the believer in Christianity asserts to have been 
 actually adopted by him, would do well if, instead of 
 building visionary schemes of presumed possibilities, 
 they would but ask themselves how, admitting the 
 actual circumstance of hum^n nature^ they can conceive 
 the possibility of such a communication by any less 
 improbable vehicle than that now supposed. 
 
 The appeal to human conviction must be made 
 in some way or other, and yet every way which we 
 can imagine must be attended with its respective 
 apparent improbabilities, of which those who are 
 disposed to cavil may readily take advantage. The 
 candid mind will of course make its option on the 
 side which presents the smallest sum total of ditfi- 
 culty; and we have no hesitation in asserting, that 
 upon a full examination of the circumstances, that 
 side will be found to be the one which assumes, in 
 the first place, that the fact of a revelation of God's 
 will is intrinsically probable : and secondly, that the 
 only professedly inspired documents, bearing the 
 apparent stamp of authenticity, are those of the 
 Jewish and Christian Scriptures. This latter propo- 
 sition it will now be our object to demonstrate to the 
 best of our power. 
 
 In attempting to speculate upon the internal pro- 
 4* 
 
42 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 bability of the truth of any alleged communication 
 from heaven, the mind is necessarily compelled to 
 occupy a peculiar position, and to lay down, at start- 
 ing, certain primary propositions, without the admis- 
 sion of which it is obviously impossible to proceed. 
 To derive our data from the facts which in this late 
 period of the -svorld are passing daily before our eyes, 
 would evidently be irrelevant and unphilosophical. 
 We must be prepared to meet with deviations from 
 the presumed established laws of the creation, as a 
 matter of course. At the same time, our experience 
 of the fixedness and uniformity of the ordinary opera- 
 tions of nature, forbids our assuming that Providence, 
 under any circumstances, would be unnecessarily 
 lavish in the operation of miracles. So long as they 
 might be wanted to give the first impulse in the 
 launching of a new system, they might reasonably 
 be looked for; but such operations as are obviously 
 within the competency of natural causes to produce, 
 might on the other hand be expected to occur, accord- 
 ing to the more ordinary process. It is on this prin- 
 ciple that a new scale of probabilities will suggest 
 itself to the inquirer into the internal evidences of 
 revelation. It would be a manifest contradiction to 
 look for a perfect analogy between the first creation 
 of a system, and its subsequent ordinary cause of 
 operation, and yet the necessary deviation from order, 
 thus occasioned, would not, it may be presumed, be 
 disorderly. In other words, the quantum of necessity 
 would be the measure of the quantum of miracle to 
 be calculated upon. It is indeed manifestly impossi- 
 ble for the human mind to act upon this rule with 
 any thing approaching to accuracy, and yet perhaps 
 we may approximate to it sufficiently for the purpose 
 of conjecturing how far the miracles, recorded in any 
 given form of revelation, appear worthy of a wise 
 Providence, and calculated to produce their respec- 
 tive objects. Every person at all acquainted with 
 the Holy Scriptures, will perceive how strikingly this 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 43 
 
 observation applies to the preternatural incidents 
 which we find there related. There is nothing in the 
 miracles of the Bible which in the slightest degree, 
 reminds us of the monstrous wonders of the imagina- 
 tive works of fiction. Be the narrative true or false, 
 at all events the admixture of preternatural occur- 
 rences is exactly, on all occasions, kept down to the 
 strict necessity of the case, and natural instruments, 
 where available, are made to contribute their share 
 towards the production of the event. This prelimi- 
 nary observation it is quite necessary that we should 
 make, in order that it may be distinctly understood 
 what is the kind of probabilities which, in the course 
 of the ensuing observations, we shall endeavour to 
 trace in the narratives of the Old and New Testa- 
 ment. No Christian, who 'recollects the inscrutable 
 mysteries which envelope Deism itself, will shrink 
 from avowing the strict analogy which, in that re- 
 spect, exists between the religion of unenlightened 
 reason, and that of the Gospel. He knows that every 
 particle of matter, every intellectual perception, teems 
 with wonder. But still it should never be forgotten 
 that the prevailing spirit of Scripture, even in its 
 highest excitement, is that of unostentatious sobriety, 
 and that a calm, candid, and teachable frame of mind 
 is that which is alone adapted for taking a compre- 
 hensive view of the whole system of revelation, and 
 pronouncing judgment upon its internal probability. 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 Of the Mosaic History of the Creation. 
 
 To begin, then, with the scriptural account of the 
 creation of the world. The doctrine of the past 
 eternity of the universe is a necessary consequence of 
 the principles of Atheism. If there exists no Creator, 
 
44 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 it obviously follows, that all things must have been, 
 from all eternity, precisely what we find them to be 
 at present ; in other words, owing their being to an 
 inherent principle of self-existence, they could never 
 have undergone any modification or change either 
 from internal or external causes. Every fact, how- 
 ever, derived from the experiments of scientific men 
 is directly at variance with this supposition. If there 
 is one conclusion in philosophy more certain than 
 another, it is that the universe around us, and the 
 globe which we inhabit, must have had a beginning. 
 Nor is this all : with regard to the latter, we know 
 not only that it has emanated from some creative 
 power, but that it has received peculiar modifications 
 from time to time, which, by the beneficial effects 
 resulting from them, mark the continuing superin- 
 tendence of a wise and benevolent mind. The present 
 condition in which we find it, has evidently been pro- 
 duced at no very remote period from our own time. 
 The several chronometers supplied by the regular 
 operation of existing phenomena on the surface of 
 the earth, all coincide most remarkably with the date 
 of the creation, as recorded in the Mosaic writings. 
 Every discovery of the geologist supplies the same 
 inference, so far as it refers to the history of the 
 human race. Be the antiquity of the material mass 
 of the globe what it may, and allowing the utmost 
 latitude to the calculations of those who conceive 
 that the various stratifications of the earth must have 
 been the result of an almost infinite succession of 
 slow deposits and diluvian submersions, still it is ad- 
 mitted by all parties, that the first appearance of man 
 must be considered as subsequent to all other forma- 
 tions of animals, and to all important modifications 
 of the mineral world, with the exception only of one 
 single diluvian action, which appears to have taken 
 effect at a later period. 
 
 That there is a broad and general appearance of 
 agreement between these facts and the Mosaic nar- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 45 
 
 rative, cannot be denied, whatever difficulty we may- 
 find in reconciling the scriptural account of a six 
 days' creation with those longer epochs of time which 
 geologists have generally considered necessary to 
 account for the successive stratifications of the soil, 
 and the production of the inferior animals. Now the 
 question is, whether this general accordance be suffi- 
 cient, even presuming the conclusions of geologists 
 to be correct, to justify our belief in the Divine 
 inspiration of the scriptural narrative of the creation ? 
 This question we may surely venture to answer in 
 the affirmative, when we recollect that the exclusive 
 object of revelation is to inculcate a moral lesson, by 
 making us acquainted with the spiritual position of 
 man, with reference to the Deity, and not with the 
 comparatively unimportant facts of natural history. 
 That Scripture, indeed, should* wilfully falsify any 
 narrative of circumstances, and gratuitously introduce 
 fable, where the plain truth would be equally intel- 
 ligible, it were impiety to suppose. But surely we 
 may admit that there would be nothing inconsistent 
 with the Divine perfections in touching only generally 
 and incidentally, and with a certain allowance for 
 the ignorance of an unphilosophical age, those portions 
 of its narrative, which are rather necessary accom- 
 paniments than any integral and component part of 
 the main subject matter. We may ask, moreover, 
 if it be required of Scripture that it should always, 
 when referring to merely physical phenomena, relate 
 the real and precise fact, " with the received opinions 
 of what age of the world would those facts accord .?" 
 Human theories, we should recollect, are continually 
 changing in proportion to the progress of discovery ; 
 and what would appear to be a philosophical truth 
 to-day, may, in many cases, be an exploded falsehood 
 to-morrow. Had Moses, for instance, inculcated the 
 doctrine of the Cartesian vortices, that circumstance, 
 which in the seventeenth century would have been 
 considered as the strongest proof of his inspiration, 
 
46 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 would have been a decided refutation of it in the latter 
 part of the eighteenth. Were strict philosophical 
 accuracy, therefore, to be required as a necessary test 
 of an inspired narrative, it is obvious that it would 
 really be in accordance with no one possible period 
 of the stale of human knowledge, unless we can sup- 
 pose that the time will actually arrive in which 
 experience will have no more to learn, and the whole 
 process of investigation be completed. If, then, even 
 revelation itself would be justified from the necessity 
 of the case, in stopping short of this extreme point, 
 why, it may be asked, should we expect it to do so 
 at one period more than another ; or rather, why 
 should it not at once adapt itself, so far as it can do 
 so consistently with the substantial communication 
 of truth, to that state of knowledge which prevailed 
 at the time when its communications were first made ? 
 Such would appear to be the course necessary to 
 make itself practically intelligible to the parties 
 addressed, and, as a choice of difficulties, would 
 seem to be the least objectionable, because the most 
 really useful mode of proceeding. 
 
 Still, however, after making due allowance for this 
 necessary principle of accommodation, facts, we 
 conceive, may be traced in the Mosaic narrative, 
 which would seem to announce an acquaintance with 
 some of the phenomena of the universe, as substan- 
 tiated by subsequent discovery, which it would be 
 difficult to account for in any other way than that of 
 a presumed express inspiration. It is true that spe- 
 culation upon these points, where the subject matter 
 is confessedly so mysterious, and upon so vast and 
 intricate a scale, ought to be indulged in with extreme 
 caution, as liable to the exaggerations and false con- 
 clusions of an excited imagination. Experimental 
 science, which is always progressive, must ever be 
 an equivocal auxiliary to the fixed and immovable 
 truths of revelation. Still, however, as infidelity has 
 for the furtherance of its object, availed itself ot pre- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 47 
 
 sumed inaccuracies in the scriptural records of the 
 creation, there cannot surely be an impropriety in 
 pointing out, with all due diffidence, a few of the 
 facts there asserted, which would seem to accord in 
 a striking manner with the discoveries of modern 
 science ; or with what might be conjectured as pro- 
 bable with reference to the early condition of a world 
 such as ours, and the condition of human nature, 
 when existing under strange and unwonted circum- 
 stances. In addition, then, to the preceding general 
 remarks on this subject, we may observe, in the first 
 place, that the surface of the globe immediately after 
 the time of its first formation, is asserted by Moses 
 to have been nearly that of semi-fluidity. Now that 
 such must have been the case is considered by geolo- 
 gists as a matter of perfect certainty. But it may 
 be urged that the proofs of this circumstance are so 
 visibly impressed upon the whole surface of the earth 
 that Moses might easily have arrived at that conclu- 
 sion, even though we suppose him to have had no 
 more than the common knowledge of a tolerably 
 careful observer of nature. — Be it so. Still it remains 
 to be shown by what happy coincidence it was that 
 the order of the successive productions of the Creator, 
 commencing in the inferior races of animals, and 
 advancing onward from fishes and birds to quadru- 
 peds, and from quadrupeds to man, should have been 
 asserted by him in a series so nearly, if not exactly, 
 corresponding with that in which the discoveries of 
 geology have shown them to have occurred. It is 
 impossible to suppose him to have been possessed of 
 facts, gleaned solely by a regular process of scientific 
 induction, sufficient for the establishment of this 
 theory. Was it then a mere fortunate guess, or are 
 we not rather justified in referring his knowledge to 
 the higher source of inspiration ? 
 
 Another remarkable seeming accordance, to say 
 the least of it, with the recent discoveries of science, 
 in a branch of philosophy which depends, for its very 
 
48 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 existence, upon the perfection of our modern optical 
 instruments, occurs almost at the very commence- 
 ment of the Mosaic narrative. Let it, however, be 
 here again observed, that we allude to these facts as 
 prima facie coincidences merely. Ignorant as mankind 
 are, and as they are probably for ever destined to 
 remain, of the real nature of the remote heavenly 
 bodies, it is evidently impossible that we can venture 
 to found upon the assumptions of modern science any 
 thing more than a vague general surmise, with regard 
 to what may be the true theory of that mysterious 
 portion of the universe. It is, we repeat, only because 
 infidelity has let pass no opportunity of directing the 
 presumed discoveries of science against revelation, 
 that we feel ourselves justified in using arguments 
 of the same description in its defence, so far as they 
 may be fairly available. The coincidence to which 
 we now allude, appears to us a striking one ; let the 
 reader attach to it what degree of credit he may con- 
 ceive that it deserves. Every person conversant with 
 the scriptural account of the creation must have been 
 to a certain degree perplexed by the fact that Moses 
 asserts light to have been called into existence on the 
 first day, and yet expressly declares that the sun and 
 moon were not created as luminaries until the fourth. 
 This statement, at first sight, has the air of singular 
 and glaring inconsistency, which it would seem to 
 be impossible to reconcile with truth. If we consider 
 the writer of the Book of Genesis as an impostor, or 
 a fanatical theorist, attempting to impose his own 
 wild speculations upon the world, we cannot possibly 
 imagine a statement less likely to suggest itself to the 
 author himself, or less calculated to secure proselytes. 
 And yet the observations of the late Sir W. Hecschell 
 afford us reason to believe, as is well known, that a 
 process is at this moment going on in the system of 
 the heavenly bodies precisely analogous with this 
 statement of the Mosaic writings. That celebrated 
 astronomer, in his paper addressed to the Royal 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 49 
 
 Society, in 1811, on the subject of the celestial 
 nebulae, has given the history of his own observations 
 carefully followed up during the course of a long life. 
 He has there shown that those irregularly shaped and 
 widely diffused masses of light, which under the 
 name of luminous nebulas, had long attracted the 
 notice of scientific men, and which are known to 
 exist in vast numbers, in various parts of the heavens, 
 are, by a regular process of gradual condensation, 
 made to approach more and more to a spherical form, 
 until, having acquired a bright stellar nucleus, and 
 losing their remaining nebulosity, they finally assume 
 all the definite brightness of a regular fixed star. From 
 the uniformity of this operation, so far as it has been 
 remarked, and from the vast multitude of instances 
 in which it has taken, and is still taking place, it 
 seems natural to infer that a large portion of those 
 stars, whose places have been recognised in the 
 heavens from time immemorial, derived their first 
 origin from the same process. But it is also the 
 generally received opinion, that the sun of our own 
 planetary system is a star precisely of the same nature 
 with the rest ; and if so, it seems not improbable 
 from analogy, that it derived its present form from 
 the same cause of condensation, and that its original 
 state of existence was that of a thin luminous fluid, 
 occupying a vast portion of the orbits of those plane- 
 tary bodies of which it is now the centre. It is surely 
 not a little remarkable, that what might a century 
 ago have been quoted as a seeming absurdity and 
 oversight in Scripture, should be found thus signally 
 to accord with one of the most curious discoveries of 
 modern astronomical science. 
 
50 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 Of the Longevity of the Antediluvian Generations. 
 
 Another peculiarity in the scriptural account of 
 the early period of the world, which, for convenience 
 sake, we shall allude to somewhat out of its regular 
 order, is the remarkable longevity which it attributes 
 to the antediluvian races. This is a statement so little 
 accordant with existing experience, that we believft 
 it to have not unfrequently startled sincere believers 
 in the general veracity of the Mosaic Avritings, whilst 
 it has, undoubtedly, seemed to afford a handle for 
 triumph to the declared sceptic. The case must be 
 admitted to be a perplexing one ; yet still we think 
 that we can perceive reasons derived from the condi- 
 tion of mankind at that early epoch which would 
 seem to make such an arrangement a not improbable 
 result of the decrees of a wise Providence. Every 
 well-founded criticism upon the internal evidence of 
 revelation, we must again remind our readers, must 
 be built entirely upon the admitted phenomena of 
 human nature, both moral and physical. We must 
 necessarily suppose that God willed the early civiliza- 
 tion of mankind, but, as we have no reason to believe 
 that the intellectual faculties of man, from the time 
 of the fall of our first parents, were other than what 
 we know them to be at the present moment, we 
 must necessarily suppose that the earliest generations 
 required precisely the same secondary helps to know- 
 ledge which, under similar circumstances, would be 
 most available to their latest descendants. Now the 
 objection of the sceptic, on this occasion, is founded 
 upon the mere gratuitous assumption, that what ap- 
 pear to us to be the fixed laws of nature, must always 
 have been such, even when the strongest necessity 
 and the most urgeat expediency required their pro- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 51 
 
 visional modification. It surely can be deemed no 
 very bold assertion, if we assume that the rule of 
 internal probability would rather incline us to adopt 
 the opposite conclusion. Admitting the present three 
 score and ten years, which are usually considered as 
 the average maximum of human life, to be sufficient 
 for every substantial purpose for which God has 
 thought fit to place us in this world, it is still per- 
 fectly obvious that so contracted a term would have 
 been quite insufficient, in the first commencement of 
 society, to enable the human race to attain at any 
 tolerably early period, to that quantum of cultivation 
 for which it is impossible not to perceive that his 
 Creator intended him. Let us suppose, then, the 
 first inhabitants of the earth existing, not only with- 
 out the more abstruse sciences, but without those 
 simple rudiments of knowledge necessary for the 
 accommodation of society in its ruder state, and let 
 us consider what would be the different results of two 
 distinct arrangements ; the one- allotting to the human 
 individual a term of existence little short of one 
 thousand years, and the other cutting him off at the 
 present more contracted date. It is evident that 
 knowledge, in the former case, would, from the vast 
 accumulation of facts, increase, as compared with 
 the latter, in almost a geometrical proportion. There 
 we should find the experienced head of a family 
 communicating to successive races of descendants 
 the hoarded experience of centuries, whilst, according 
 to the other supposition, we might expect to see the 
 first commencements of knowledge cut off* periodi- 
 cally in their very germ, and generation succeeding 
 to generation with no better lights of science than the 
 transmitted abortive attempts of persons whose lives 
 have terminated almost before their really effective 
 education had begun. It would, of course, be the 
 height of presumption to assert that this is the real 
 explanation of the remarkable dispensation of Pro- 
 vidence now alluded to. It cannot, however, be 
 
52 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 doubted, that allowing to the earljr race of mankind 
 the same average faculties possessed by their descend- 
 ants, such would be the very dissimilar degrees of 
 benefit produced by the two different systems here 
 supposed. How, then, would it be advocating an 
 improbability, to suppose that a benevolent Creator 
 may, under a special emergency, have peculiarly 
 adapted the operation of secondary causes, for a 
 limited period, to the wants of his creatures ?* Be, 
 
 * It seems perfectly certain, from what we know experimentally of 
 the nature of the human faculties, that man at his first creation must, 
 for some short time at least, have depended for his animal existence upon 
 the special superintendence of his Creator in a manner to which we find 
 nothmg analogous in the existing order of the univei*se. All well-in- 
 formed persons, whether sceptics or believers in revelation, are agreed in 
 admitting that the human race were first introduced into our planet at a 
 comparatively recent period of time. What then was the condition of 
 the aboriginal parents of mankind at the moment of their first produc- 
 tion 1 The case admits of only two suppositions ; they were either chil- 
 dren or adults : in either supposition a m.iracle, or what is equivalent to a 
 miracle, was necessary for their support. Had they been children, it is 
 self-evident that they must have perished within a few hours after their 
 creation, unless sustained by some such providential interference as that 
 now supposed. If they were adults, the result would have been the 
 same, although the argument from which we derive that inference may 
 be somewhat less palpably obvious. All the practical knowledge which 
 we arrive at through our bodily senses is, we know, derived solely from 
 experience. A human adult, waking for the first ti ne to the conscious- 
 ness of existence, with all his animal faculties in fui" vigour, and under 
 the most favourable circumstances of climate and bodily comfort, would 
 be as incapable as a new-born infant of availing himself, by any natural 
 effort, of the means of sustenance, however liberally spread around him, 
 and would perish before he would have acquired the knowledge requisite 
 for the support of life. He would possess eyes, but the impression of 
 external objects upon the retina would convey no definite ideas : he would 
 have limbs, but they would be useless for the purposes of locomotion. He 
 would want every conception of space, distance, solidity, vacuity, &c. 
 In addition to this, he would be debarred from the fiaculty of the commu- 
 nication of his feelings by speech. It is manifest, that under such cir- 
 cumstances, life could be maintained only by the direct intervention of 
 some guardian power, either instilling miraculously that practical know- 
 ledge which, under ordinary circumstances, is the result of long expe- 
 rience only, or else directly providing for his physical necessities, as they 
 successively occurred. That the human race does exist at this moment, 
 is a proof that some such special care as that now supposed must have 
 been extended by the mercy of the Creator to the parent stock from which 
 we are descended. It is, therefore, perfectly vain and un philosophical to 
 assume what may have been the physical circumstances of the world in 
 in its infancy, from what is at this moment passing before our eyes. So 
 far from infeiTing them to have been the same with the present course of 
 events, we are compelled to suppose that they must have been in many 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 53 
 
 however, this as it may, it is certain that the inspired 
 historian pleads neither this nor any other reason as 
 an explanation of the seemingly anomalous fact which 
 he records. He seems to compose his narrative merely 
 ministerially, and without the insertion of a single 
 comment. We detect in it nothing of the interested 
 advocate, striving to show the real internal probability 
 of a startling proposition. No mode of writing, as- 
 suredly, carries with it more of the air of real inspira- 
 tion than that where the facts stated appear at first 
 sight incongruous and anomalous, but lose, upon 
 subsequent reflection, much of their apparent im- 
 probability ; and where the writer himself appears 
 to be perfectly unaware of the value of the truths 
 he is communicating. Whether this observation will 
 apply to the case now before us, may be matter of 
 opinion. It is one, however, which may, with cer- 
 tainty, be extended to many striking passages both of 
 the Old and of the New Testament. 
 
 respects essentially different So fallacious is the argument derived from 
 our own mere personal experience in these mysterious questions. With 
 regard to the use of language, it seems difficult to imagine that it could 
 have been possessed by the earliest generations of mankind, excepting 
 through the aid of Divine instruction. This surmise, which the acknow- 
 ledged circumstances of our nature seem to point out as the only probable 
 solution of a great metaphysical difficulty, seems to derive some warrant 
 from the statement given in Genesis ii. 19. " And out of the ground the 
 Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air ; and 
 brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them : and whatso- 
 ever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof." 
 
 5* 
 
54 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 Of the Pall of our First Parents. 
 
 The most remarkable and perplexing part of the 
 Mosaic narrative-of the early history of the human, 
 species is that which refers to the original condition 
 in Paradise of our first parents, and to their subse- 
 quent fall. As this event constitutes the very founda- 
 tion upon which the whole structure of Christianity 
 is built, and as it has afforded not only the great 
 object of attack to Infidels, but has also been a source 
 of the most discordant opinions among the various 
 denominations of Christians, it will be expedient ta 
 examine it in some considerable detail. On a subject, 
 indeed, so profoundly mysterious, it would be absurd 
 in the extreme to hope that any examination of ours 
 could suggest any satisfactory explanation of what is 
 manifestly beyond the reach of human reason. All 
 that we can attempt to do is, to take the few facts 
 related by Moses in as literal a sense as possible, 
 keeping out of sight, at the same time, all the tradi- 
 tional notions which, without any authority of Scrip- 
 ture, have, in the course of ages, been attached to 
 them by human ingenuity; and then to inquire how 
 far what we find to be actually stated as matter of 
 fact accords with the established and acknowledged 
 phenomena of human nature. In order to come to a 
 perfect understanding on this point, it will, of course, 
 be necessary to examine our moral constitution, such 
 as, from our own internal consciousness and our in- 
 tercourse with mankind we know it experimentally 
 to be, and to observe how far it bears any traces of 
 that degradation which we are told has been thus 
 inflicted upon it, subsequently to its first production 
 by its Creator. Now there is not, perhaps, a single 
 Theist, or even Atheist, who will not, on this subject, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 55 
 
 assent implicitly to the definition of our nature as 
 afforded by revelation. " The heart of man is evil 
 from his youth." Is this, we ask, or is it not, the 
 strict truth ? It matters not for the present argument 
 how such happened originally to be the case. The 
 question is one of practical experience. " The good 
 that I would, I do not," says St. Paul, " but the evil 
 which I would not, that I do." Here is the assertion 
 of an abstract perception and preference in our minds 
 of what is good and honest, continued with an actual 
 practical bias and predisposition in our carnal feel- 
 ings, to act directly in contradiction to our better 
 judgment, which we have no hesitation in asserting, 
 that every human being has occasionally perceived 
 within himself from his first infancy. Is, then, this 
 strange collision, which we all feel, between our 
 moral sense, and the' suggestions of our animal 
 nature, curable by any inherent power of spiritual 
 exertion lodged within ourselves? The very terms 
 of the proposition already stated, supply at once an 
 answer to this question. If the preponderance of 
 our nature is evil, it cannot be supposed to supply 
 any effectual medicine for its own cure ; and if so, 
 the necessity of some external dispensation, like that 
 of the Gospel, for the removal of this original, and, 
 by us, incurable taint, would appear to follow as a 
 matter of course. It would signify nothing, we repeat, 
 as to the argument of our need of some express mode 
 of reconciliation with God, how this disease of sin 
 was originally introduced into man's constitution, 
 if the fact of its actual existence there be once well 
 established. Let it have been impressed upon each 
 individual distinctly and specially at his birth ; let it 
 have been the original modification of the human 
 heart ; or let it have been the acquired consequence 
 of some act of indiscretion in our first parents, the 
 consequence to ourselves will, at all events, be pre- 
 cisely the same. The fact that we are all of us far gone 
 from righteousness will still remain unimpeached. 
 
56 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 In this point of view, then, the recorded history of 
 the fall of our first parents is a matter of speculative 
 curiosity rather than of real moment. We might 
 naturally wish to know whence this strange and 
 anomalous moral arrangement took its origin, but the 
 practical result to ourselves would remain the same, 
 be our theory with regard to that origin what it might. 
 Man, undoubtedly, as a moral agent, prefers evil to 
 good. This is more or less true with this or that 
 individual, but it is still, in a great degree, certainly 
 true of all. Even the best men will occasionally 
 recognise, within themselves, a kind of inconsequen- 
 tial reasoning, which they know to be false, whilst 
 they yield to it : a species of morbid appetite lo do 
 precisely that which conscience tells them to be sin- 
 ful. But with regard to the great mass of mankind, 
 it is truly fearful to think how vast is the extent of 
 depravity, which is kept within tolerable limits, and 
 is rendered compatible with the existence of social 
 order, only by the restraints of public opinion, or by 
 the fear of the magistrate. It is true, indeed, that to 
 the eye of the careless observer, the external aspect 
 of society, for the most part, appears sufficiently 
 smooth ; but it is because in every civilized country 
 the superincumbent weight of civil government and 
 conventional decorum keeps down that tendency to 
 resistance which is sure to manifest itself the mo- 
 ment that, by change of circumstances, an opportu- 
 nity for so doing is afforded. But the principle of 
 morals, we should recollect, has much less to do with 
 external actions than with internal motives. It 
 follows, therefore, as a necessary consequence, not 
 only that a man may be a grievous sinner before 
 God, whose conduct in society has afforded no handle 
 whatever to actual censure, but, also, it is an obvious 
 proposition, that his internal and substantial guilt 
 (his external actions continuing precisely the same) 
 will ever advance progressively in atrocity, precisely 
 in proportion to the degree of positive better know- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 57 
 
 ledge against the dictates of which he shall be de- 
 liberately offending. 
 
 This proposition being admitted, the conclusion is 
 inevitable ; namely, that, so long as the original cor- 
 ruption of the heart continues undiminished, every 
 advance in moral and religious knowledge will necessa- 
 rily be an advance in guiltiness. Precisely on the same 
 prmciple by which we blame that ferocity in the 
 uncultivated savage, which we consider a mere 
 animal instinct in a beast of prey, and excuse that 
 conduct in a savage which would be deemed unpar- 
 donable in a civilized heathen ; so, the same dead- 
 ness of spiritual feeling, which would be a matter of 
 course in the latter character, would attach an awful 
 responsibility to the well-instructed Christian . — Know- 
 ledge, then, is the source of guiltiness : increase of 
 knowledge to any class of beings, whose instinctive 
 predisposition is such as to incline them to prefer 
 knowingly the worse to the better principle, is vir- 
 tually and substantially an increase of guilt. Such, 
 then, is the fallacy of the argument which would 
 attribute to man the faculty of healing by his own 
 natural powers of moral exertion, with no better 
 guide than his intuitive perceptions of right and 
 wrong, the evil which we find to have been, in some 
 way or other, inflicted upon his spiritual nature. 
 
 Having made these preliminary observations, let 
 us now consider the narrative of the fall of our first 
 
 Earents as given in the Mosaic writings, and observe 
 ow far it accords with the anomalous constitution of 
 the human heart, as established by our own expe- 
 rience. In discussing this subject, it is no easy 
 matter to detach ourselves from the associations 
 arising from early oral expositions, and the theories 
 of rival controversialists, and to fix our attention 
 singly and exclusively upon what has been actually 
 revealed. Perhaps no one theological fact, in conse- 
 quence of the momentous interests connected with 
 it, and the train of poetic ideas which it is so well 
 
58 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 calculated to suggest, has suffered more from the 
 admixture of extraneous human theories than the 
 one before us. The very small space occupied in 
 Scripture by the narrative of the fall of man, when 
 compared with our own multifarious conceptions on 
 the subject, may afford a salutary hint to the mind of 
 every well disposed person, of the danger incident to 
 us all, of mistaking our peculiar intellectual specula- 
 tions and the traditions of our infancy for revelation 
 itself, if we do not take care to secure the accuracy of 
 our notions, by measuring them carefully from time 
 to time, with what we find to be expressly written. 
 It is obvious, that if we would discuss this, or any 
 other mysterious theological question, with accuracy 
 and fairness, we can do so only by abiding, as closely 
 as possible, by the strict letter of Holy Writ, inter- 
 posing our own speculations solely where they appear 
 to follow as necessary inferences from the acknow- 
 ledged language of the original document. 
 
 In the first place, then, we may observe, that the 
 Book of Genesis does not seem to assert that our first 
 parents were created in their own proper nature, 
 immortal, though it appears certain that, had they 
 retained their obedience, they were not only capable 
 of, but actually destined for, an incidental and con- 
 ditional immortality, the consequence of their repair- 
 ing the decay of their bodies by the fruit of the tree 
 of life. This last species of immortality, though a 
 real and effective one, is still different in kind from 
 that which would result as a necessary consequence 
 from the original constitution of the corporeal frame. 
 In the one case mortality would follow, from the 
 mere circumstance of withholding the necessary 
 aliment : in the other it could be superinduced only 
 by introducing an entire change of the animal habits 
 and functions. What, therefore, would have been 
 the ultimate allotment of mankind had the fall never 
 taken place, or had some occasional individuals 
 amongst the descendants of Adam only fallen into 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 59 
 
 sin, and our first parents escaped from pollution, is 
 a matter of mere conjecture, on which it were as 
 unwise, as it is unnecessary, to hazard an opinion. 
 It appears, moreover, in the second place, that how- 
 ever morally superior our first parents may have 
 been in consequence of their unblemished innocence 
 to their guilty posterity (and vast undoubtedly that 
 superiority was) still with regard to the general scope 
 and compass of their knowledge, they were inferior, 
 not only to their own offspring, but to what they 
 themselves subsequently became in their fallen and 
 guilty condition. So far as we can judge from the 
 very short statement given in the Book of Genesis, 
 man, at his first creation, was the first of terrestrial 
 animals, highly and admirably fitted for his situation, 
 by the possession of many appropriate blessings, and 
 possessed of that exact degree of understanding which 
 was calculated for every purpose of harmless, and, 
 
 Erobably, of refined enjoyment ; and yet he appears to 
 ave been left without that intuitive moral sense, 
 which, by inculcating the nice and eternal distinctions 
 of right and wrong, renders us capable of sinning, 
 from the simple fact, that it exclusively suggests the 
 rule by which we apprehend our duty. It is clear 
 that this last mentioned faculty might have been 
 kindly withheld by the Creator, on account of the 
 fearful risk attending upon a gift so critical and so 
 easily abused, and yet that a vast residue of intel- 
 lectual endowment might have remained for the 
 purposes of harmless enjoyment, as the allotment of 
 the human race. Almost all the arts which add to 
 the social happiness of life, a very large portion of 
 the pleasures of imagination, and all the treasures of 
 experimental knowledge, might have been possessed 
 in a high, perhaps in an exuberant degree of perfec- 
 tion, by creatures untainted by sin, because unen- 
 dowed with that peculiar apprehension which alone 
 creates the capability of sinning. Such a constitu- 
 tion of human nature, in its joriginal state, would 
 
$0 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 seem to harmonize exactly with what might be pre- 
 sumed as probable with regard to the allotment on 
 the surface of this globe, of the most perfect portion 
 of God's earthly creation. Certain it is that revela- 
 tion seems expressly to imply, that man did not acquire 
 the knowledge of good and evil until the moment of 
 his transgression of the Divine prohibition. And it 
 is a remarkable confirmation of this view of the sub- 
 ject, that the first and immediate consequence of his 
 disobedience was a newly acquired sense of propriety 
 and decency which he had not possessed in his state 
 of innocence. " The eyes of both of them were 
 opened, and they knew that they were naked." At 
 the same time, it would appear that their animal 
 passions became depraved as their moral apprehen- 
 sions were enlarged, and thus begun that struggle 
 between carnality and better knowledge, which has 
 descended from them in such fatal proportion to their 
 guilty posterity. We may also observe, in confirma- 
 tion of the supposition here hazarded, namely, that 
 man attained to an enlarged state of moral appre- 
 hension by the fall, though by that acquisition he 
 destroyed the just equilibrium of his original and 
 more happily blended nature, that this view of the 
 subject appears to be sanctioned by the expression 
 which Moses puts into the mouth of the Almiglity 
 with reference to that event : — " And the Lord God 
 said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know 
 good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, 
 and take also the tree of life, and eat, and live for 
 ever, therefore the Lord sent him forth from the garden 
 of Eden," &c. 
 
 The purport of the Mosaic account then appears to 
 be, that what really occasioned the fall and ruin of 
 our nature, or in other words, the introduction of our 
 present incongruous and anomalous moral constitu- 
 tion, and of sin as a necessary consequence, was the 
 acquisition of an accurate knowledge of the distinc- 
 tions of right and wrong, by a creature not originally 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 6t 
 
 fitted for its reception, and, therefore, incapable of 
 making a proper use of it. That such a change could 
 not be a subject of approbation with a God of infinite 
 moral purity, and in whose sight the amplest endow- 
 ments of intellect can be valuable only as they are 
 found to cooperate with the great principles of duty, 
 is obviously certain. The evil spiritual beings so 
 frequently alluded to by Scripture, no doubt, possess 
 intellectual powers far beyond those at present allotted 
 to the human race, but, assuredly, such faculties serve 
 only to enhance their depravity. It should, however, 
 be remembered, that although moral knowledge, so 
 long as it is likely to be abused by its possessors, 
 must be admitted to be a fatal acquisition to any 
 beings, and especially to such as may have been placed 
 in that happy state of innocence enjoyed by our first 
 parents; it is still, in strictness, not only a good in 
 itself, when properly employed, but also a good, abso- 
 lutely necessary as a constituent for the happiness 
 and perfection of the higher order of beings. From 
 the certainty of this fact, then, we may, perhaps, 
 venture humbly to surmise why this seeming anomaly 
 was allowed by a wise and good Providence to occur 
 in his creation. Why, it is asked, was not man pre- 
 cluded from the possibility of t'aking the fatal step 
 which produced his fall ? It were presumptuous in 
 us to attempt to answer this question, excepting in 
 the strictest form of diffident conjecture. Still, how- 
 ever, we know from the words of the two inspired 
 apostles, Paul and Peter, that the expiatory atone- 
 ment of Christ was prepared in the councils of Infinite 
 Wisdom before the foundations of the world were 
 laid. We are, therefore, justified in inferring, that 
 when the Creator in his mercy condescended to 
 forewarn the parents of the human race of the immi- 
 nent peril in which their violation of a salutary 
 admonition would involve them and their posterity, 
 he not only foresaw their disobedience, but also pre- 
 pared an arrangement for averting from them the 
 6 
 
62 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 consequences naturally resulting from it. And not 
 only may we, in conformity with the strict letter of 
 Scripture, infer thus much, but Ave may also indulge 
 in a reasonable expectation that the change which 
 has thus taken place in the allotment of mankind 
 will ultimately prove to have been rather a gain than 
 a loss to such persons as shall have duly availed 
 themselves of the means afforded for their restoration , 
 and that the redeemed servants of Christ will be 
 found to have exchanged the humbler condition of 
 simply happy and innocent beings upon earth for a 
 preeminent state of moral apprehension, and of ex- 
 quisite enjoyment in heaven, far exceeding that of 
 the station which they have lost. It is very remark- 
 able that two favourite and ingenious apologues pre- 
 vailed among,the heathen philosophers of antiquity, 
 both of them having reference to the introduction of 
 evil by the acquisition of knowledge, and which 
 would seem to have been suggested to their inventors 
 by the scriptural narrative of the fall of our first 
 parents. The beautiful fable of the guilty curiosity 
 and subsequent wanderings of Psyche, until her final 
 reconciliation with her divine husband ; and that of 
 Prometheus, particularly as it is given in the terribly 
 splendid drama of jEschylus ; each of them clearly 
 point to this important fact. If not actually derived 
 from Scripture, they, at all events, show, by their 
 remarkable coincidence with one another, and with 
 the Mosaic history, that the hypothesis to which they 
 refer is a correct inference from the philosophy of 
 morals. 
 
 Such, then, is the account which the Bible gives of 
 the first origin of those strange anomalies in the moral 
 character of human nature, the real existence of 
 which, as essential phenomena demonstrably attach- 
 ing to us, the most determined infidel must at all 
 events admit, however he may be disposed to ques- 
 tion the mode of their first introduction. Here, then, 
 it remains to be asked whether, granting our consti- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 63 
 
 tution to be actually such, there is any intrinsic 
 improbability in the account thus given. The great 
 and staggering improbability is, that man should be 
 what we find that he is. This, however, is not a 
 point which admits of discussion. It is a simple 
 matter of fact, respecting the certainty of which it is 
 impossible to doubt. Such, then, being the case, the 
 question really at issue between the believer and the 
 sceptic is, whether it is more consistent with our 
 notions of the probable proceedings of Providence 
 that the discordant principles which are known to 
 exist within us should be supposed to have been su- 
 perinduced at a period subsequent to man's creation, 
 than that he should have originally proceeded, such 
 as he now is, from the hands of his Maker. This is 
 surely a point upon which, independently of the 
 authority of revelation, it were presumptuous to form 
 an opinion. But certainly there is nothing contradic- 
 tory to sound reason in supposing the former to have 
 been the fact. That the flesh is found experimentally 
 to be at variance with the spirit, suggests, at all events, 
 a presumption that they were not fitted originally 
 the one for the other ; whilst, at the same time, admit- 
 ting the truth of the scriptural theory, that this life 
 in its present modification is intended to be a state 
 of probation, the secondary arrangement which has 
 thus been allowed to come into operation is found to 
 harmonize with all that we can infer as the most 
 probable solution of other difficulties connected with 
 the mysterious dealings of Providence. To the mis- 
 representation, then, of the infidel, who asserts it to 
 be the doctrine of Scripture, that the eternal perdition 
 of all mankind is a just retribution attaching to each 
 individual of the human race for one single act of 
 disobedience committed in the persons of their first 
 parents, the answer is obvious. Scripture inculcates 
 no such doctrine. It tells us, indeed, (and every 
 Christian is bound to admit the strict accuracy of the 
 assertion,) that by one act of disobedience sin came 
 
64 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 into the world, and by sin, death. But such would 
 also have been equally the case had the first human 
 beings derived to themselves, and transmitted through 
 their own persons to their descendants, a knowledge 
 of moral good and evil, with a mechanism of corrupt 
 passions, by any other specific process than that 
 recorded by Moses. So long as our sense of right 
 and wrong is accurate, whilst, at the same time, the 
 spirit of disobedience is strong within us, sin, how- 
 ever at first introduced, will continue to prevail ; and 
 where sin is, there its natural consequences must be 
 presumed to follow, unless such a result can be shown 
 to be superseded by some effectual counteraction, 
 such as every Christian believes to be afforded by the 
 expiatory merits of his Saviour. Of one thing we 
 may be quite certain, namely, that had any other 
 explanation of the first origin of sin and death been 
 given to us, it would have been as unsparingly cri- 
 ticised, and as dogmatically rejected by the sceptic, 
 as that Avhich we are taught to receive as the correct 
 historical fact. At the same time, we may venture 
 confidently to assert, that it would be difficult, if not 
 impossible, for the imagination to invent a theory 
 more exactly accordant with what we know by ex- 
 perience of our own nature, than that which has thus 
 come to us under the presumed sanction of revelation. 
 
"WITH HUMAN REASON. 65 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 Of the History of the general Deluge^ and the Confusion of Tongues, 
 
 Few, if any, physical facts appear more difficult to 
 account for, upon any known principles of experi- 
 mental science, than that of the general deluge, as 
 asserted in Scripture ; and yet, perhaps, there is not 
 one of those which do not fall within the course of 
 our own actual experience, the absolute certainty 
 of which is more completely demonstrated by the 
 traces left of its existence upon the surface of the 
 globe. It is the opinion of most geologists that 
 several submersions of the crust of the earth, in whole 
 or in part, have taken place from time to time in the 
 course of the order of nature. All of them, however, 
 appear to be unanimously agreed that one deluge at 
 least, answering exactly to that recorded by Moses, 
 did certainly prevail at a period subsequent to the 
 creation of the present races of animals, whose relics 
 are still found in vast abundance in the most recent 
 strata. It is, therefore, perfectly vain to start objec- 
 tions, derived from abstract speculations of our own 
 creation, against the physical possibility of an event, 
 the certainty of which has been thus substantiated by 
 irrefragable evidence. From the case in question, 
 however, we may at all events derive an important 
 lesson with regard to any sceptical doubts which, 
 from the presumed certainty of the conclusions of 
 experimental science, we may feel disposed to enter- 
 tain on the subject of other perternatural occurrences 
 related in the Holy Scriptures. Were we to have 
 recourse to theory alone, we no doubt should have 
 little hesitation in pronouncing upon the extreme 
 improbability, not to say the impossibility, of a deluge, 
 such as that which we read of in the writings of 
 6^ 
 
66 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 Moses. Voltaire, who took up this ground, but whose 
 knowledge in experimental philosophy was too super- 
 ficial to render his objections formidable, asserts boldly 
 the demonstration of the falsity of the scriptural nar- 
 rative. " The physical impossibility " he s-ays, "of a 
 universal deluge by any natural means is proveable by 
 the most rigorous demonstration.^^ It is amusing to 
 observe that he lays down, as the first principle on 
 which to build this rigorous course of proof, the pal- 
 pably unfounded assertion, that the average depth of 
 the ocean does not exceed 500 feet. Upon the as- 
 sumption of this position, accompanied by the gratui- 
 tous one that the relative depths and elevation of the 
 bed of the ocean, and of the adjoining continents are, 
 under all circumstances, incapable of any variation, 
 the necessity of the conclusion to which he would 
 arrive seems indeed sufficiently obvious. In answer 
 again to the supposition that the submersion of the 
 earth to the depth asserted by Scripture, could be 
 produced by rain discharged from the atmosphere, it 
 has been shown by other writers, (and in this case, on 
 correct philosophical principles) not only that the time 
 required to produce such a mass of water from that 
 source would be much longer that the scriptural 
 account would appear to allow, but also that even if 
 the entire atmosphere Avith all its contents, were 
 condensed into water, the whole volume, thus pro- 
 duced, would not occasion a deluge much exceeding 
 thirty feet in height. In the hope of meeting this 
 objection, other theories have been suggested from 
 time to time, such as that of a change in the inclina- 
 tion of the earth's axis, an alteration in the rate of 
 its diurnal rotation, the attraction of a comet, and 
 other causes of a similar nature, founded upon the 
 presumed established facts of modern experimental 
 science. It is, however, generally admitted that 
 none of these ingenious and well-intentioned sugges- 
 tions are in all respects satisfactory. After all we 
 must be content to learn on this, as on almost every 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 67 
 
 Other theological subject, a lesson of salutary humility, 
 and to abide by the demonstration which we possess 
 of the actual certaintv of the recorded event, without 
 hoping to explain what resources Divine Providence 
 may have in store, in the magazine of secondary 
 causes for tbe operation of its ends. 
 
 " There are more things in Heaven and earth, Horatio, 
 Than are dreampt of in your philosophy." 
 
 Still, however, without attempting to propose any 
 thing like a solution of the difficulties which beset 
 this subject, we may venture to observe, that the 
 assertion, which has been so confidently made, that 
 the whole globe of the earth, and the whole atmos- 
 phere united, do not contain a sufficient quantity 
 of fluid for such a submersion of the earth, as that 
 related in Scripture, is any thing rather than borne 
 out by the most accurate calculations of men of" 
 science. Scripture declares that the breaking up of 
 the fountains of the great deep was made to co- 
 operate on that occasion with the descent of rain ; 
 or, as it is styled in revelation, the opening of the 
 windows of heaven. The present proportion of the 
 surface of the sea, as compared with that of the land, 
 is generally estimated as two parts in three. With 
 regard to the actual extreme depth of the ocean, 
 nothing can be inferred beyond probable conjectures. 
 No soundings, from the operation of well known 
 causes, have ever descended much beyond a mile, but 
 there is strong reason for believing that the mean 
 depth very far exceeds that amount. There would, 
 perhaps, be no improbability in the supposition which 
 would consider six miles as the mean depth. Be 
 that, however, as it may, there is every reason to 
 suppose that the solid surface of the earth has, sub- 
 sequently to its creation, undergone violent changes 
 affecting its partial elevation and depression. Were 
 then the present bed of the ocean raised by any strong 
 subterranean action, to the level of the adjoining 
 
68 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 continents, the deluge produced would most probably 
 at least equal that related by Moses ; or again the 
 same effect might in great measure be produced by 
 the depression of the land itself; or in the third place, 
 we may imagine both causes cooperating on the oc- 
 casion alluded to. The most plausible surmise we 
 can make, both with reference to the language of 
 Scripture, and in explanation of existing phenomena, 
 seems to be that some important change was pro- 
 duced at that important epoch upon the surface of the 
 globe, by which the relative proportion of land and 
 sea became permanently altered. What that change 
 was, hoAvever, it is difficult, if not impossible, to form 
 a well-grounded opinion. There appears to be some 
 warrant in Scripture for the supposition that rain was 
 unknown in the antediluvian ages. At least the 
 appearance of the rainbow upon the subsidence of 
 the waters of the deluge, is described in a manner to 
 leave the impression of its being the first occurrence 
 of that phenomenon ; and with regard to the state of 
 the world before the fall of our first parents, it is ex- 
 pressly asserted that "no rain fell from the heavens 
 in those days, but there went up a dew which watered 
 the ground," whilst no intimation is given that this 
 state of things was altered till the time of the deluge. 
 We can, however, account for the absence of rain 
 upon any known natural principles only, by the sup- 
 position that the prc^ortion of sea, as compared with 
 that of dry land was much less in the antediluvian 
 ages, than it has been subsequently to that crisis. 
 The diminished evaporation which would take place 
 under such circumstances, would apparently produce 
 the result now supposed. So long as the earth was 
 only thinly and partially peopled, such a state of things 
 as that here surmised would not be incompatible with 
 the wants of mankind, though it would be perfectly 
 inconsistent with the general diffusion of population 
 over the whole globe. The change which took place 
 at that same period, in the average duration of human 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON* 09 
 
 life, would also seem to indicate some alteration of a 
 permanent character in the condition of man's abode 
 upon earth, less favourable to our animal powers. 
 That change, we may observe, though immediate in 
 a very great proportion, was not total and complete, 
 till after the lapse of a considerable time subsequent 
 to Noah : a circumstance which well accords with the 
 hypothesis above stated, since it is natural to suppose 
 that the stronger stimulus of vitality would not yield 
 immediately to the operation of changes in climate or 
 other similar causes, but would adapt itself gradually, 
 and through successive generations, to its new posi- 
 tion, until it had reached the maximum of depression, 
 at which it would remain stationary. This, however, 
 with all the foregoing conjectures, be it rememil>ered, 
 we give strictly and simply as such. Most probably, 
 after all, they are very far from meeting the real diffi- 
 culty of the case. The real and substantial proofs 
 of the Mosaic deluge are the records of its occurrence 
 indelibly and unanswerably impressed upon the 
 earth's surface ; and they are completely satisfactory. 
 If we have ventured to add any confirmatory sug- 
 gestions of our own, let them be considered as in- 
 tended rather to show the utter futility of the objec- 
 tions of the infidel, than to throw light upon what, 
 at least in the present state of science, must be con- 
 sidered an inexplicable mystery. 
 
 The confusion of languages at Babel is the first 
 important event related in Scripture, as occurring 
 after the period of the deluge. The Mosaic statement 
 is altogether so mysterious as scarcely to admit of 
 any explanatory conjecture. It may, however, be 
 incidentally observed, that if we take into considera- 
 tion the known instinctive attachment of mankind to 
 their native soil, their tendency to congregate toge- 
 ther in large communities, and the destructive feuds 
 which would arise in an overcrowded population, 
 where each person would be rather disposed to expel 
 his neighbour, at any cost, than to remove the incon- 
 
70 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 venient pressure by his own voluntary emigration, we 
 can scarcely imagine any means so well adapted to 
 counteract what, at that peculiar period of the world, 
 would have operated as a mischievous propensity, 
 and to promote a voluntary colonization in other dis- 
 tricts without either animosity or bloodshed, as the 
 introduction of the momentary inconvenience result- 
 ing from the misapprehension of each other's lan- 
 guage. Scripture, it is true, does not assign this or 
 any reason, for the miracle ; of course, therefore, it 
 can be mentioned only as a mere surmise, founded 
 upon the known propensities of human nature, and 
 upon the assumption that Providence avails itself, for 
 the most part, of existing secondary causes, for the 
 furtherance of its ends, which it would be absurd to 
 advance with any degree of confidence. 
 
 CHAPTER IX. 
 
 Of the internal Prohahility of the peculiar Revelation of the Divine 
 Will confairied in t/ie Jewish Scriptures, and of the moral tendency 
 of that Revelation. 
 
 It is certain that the natural tendency of the 
 human heart, in the absence of any external religious 
 stimulus, such as that of a positive Divine revelation 
 existing under solemn and authoritative sanctions, is 
 to fall into a total forgetfulness of its Creator, and an 
 indifference to all but corporeal objects. This is one 
 of those truths, for the reality of which we may con- 
 fidently appeal to the whole past experience of man- 
 kind. Man, from the period of his first existence, 
 appears necessarily to have stood in need of some 
 mode of direct communication with his Maker, it 
 being perfectly demonstrable that there is nothing in 
 the resorts of unassisted reason capable of filling up 
 that void in our moral and intellectual faculties which 
 would be left by the substraction of the aids of reve- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 71 
 
 lation. When this last help is wanting, the total 
 degradation of our nature is the invariable conse- 
 quence. On the other hand, we must be prepared in 
 candour to admit, that as such a systematic commu- 
 nication with the Divine Being, as that now assumed 
 to be necessary, implies nothing less than the opera- 
 tion of a continuity of miracles, there is certainly, at 
 first sight, a semblance of improbability, and, as it 
 would almost appear, of clumsiness of contrivance, in 
 a system which would seem* to require the constant 
 direct interference of its Author for the preservation 
 of order, or the prevention of derangement. Here, 
 however, as before, we are precluded from the adop- 
 tion of our own more plausible theories, as to what 
 things ought to be, by the obstinacy of unanswerable 
 facts. In discussing the arguments for and against 
 revelation in general, we are reduced to the necessity 
 of choosing between two alternatives. We must 
 either, in the one case, suppose human nature to 
 have been left by its Creator entirely to its own 
 moral and intellectual resources, in which event we 
 see nothing before us but the most fearful state of 
 spiritual abandonment and degradation ; or, on the 
 other hand, we must be ready to admit the probability 
 of some direct interposition of Providence, incul- 
 cating some positive code of moral laws ; and thus 
 coming, to a certain degree, into collision with man's 
 free agency, and the seemingly established order of 
 the universe. Actual and uniform experience, we 
 repeat, has shown the total untenableness of any 
 intermediate theory. It is evident, however, that the 
 difficulty here is full as great (if not infinitely greater) 
 on tlie side of scepticism as on that which assumes 
 the necessity of a system of revelation for our spirit- 
 ual guidance. We see, it is true, no a priori reason 
 why man should have been created such as he is, 
 but being such, our course of argument, in order to be 
 correct, must adopt that admission as an elementary 
 truth. Now, if the report of Scripture be correct, the 
 
72 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 course which Providence in its wisdom has pursuetl 
 from the first, has been to arrive at its important 
 object, the elevation and instruction of our species, 
 ty the least possible deviation from the ordinary 
 course of events, and by interfering, in the smallest 
 degree possible, with the free-will of man. A revela- 
 tion, under some form other, appears from the com- 
 mencement of the world to have been offered to, but 
 never obtruded upon, mankind. The human race 
 have ever been left free to adopt or to reject, to make 
 their election between good and evil. In every suc- 
 cessive age, accordingly, the primitive distinction 
 between the sons of God and the children of men 
 seems to have existed. The Almighty has uniformly 
 disclosed himself sufficiently to be found out by those 
 who seek him, but insufficiently for the apprehension 
 of those whose minds have been otherwise employed 
 in the selfish pursuits of mere worldly enjoyment. 
 Such, according to the Mosaic account, was undoubt- 
 edly the condition of the antediluvian generations ; 
 such was tha-t of the early patriarchal ages ; such 
 was that, on a more extended scale, of the Jews, 
 under the Levitical institutions ; and such it is at the 
 present moment in the consummation of revelation 
 under the Christian covenant. In no one period has 
 God left himself without some record of his existence 
 and attributes; the blessing, indeed, has been une- 
 qually diffused, and whilst a large portion of mankind 
 have been allowed to continue with no other spiritual 
 guidance than that of their own instinctive moral 
 sense, some few select communities have been set 
 as a beacon on a hill for the diffusion of the light of 
 revealed truth to all who were disposed to profit by it. 
 Now it were indeed presumptuous to say that Pro- 
 Tidence has selected this as the only possible course 
 between conflicting difficulties: but it is at least 
 incumbent upon those who calumniate this arrange- 
 ment as both partial and inadequate for the occasion, 
 to show how the first elements of sound religion 
 
WITH HTTMAN REASON. 73 
 
 (Jould have been kept alive during a long course of 
 ages of comparative barbarism, with any thing less 
 than this presumed degree of direct Divine inter- 
 ference, or how human free agency, which constitutes 
 the basis of every rational notion of religion, could 
 have been compatible with more. Truth we know 
 to be uniform and self-consistent, but the human 
 powers of the apprehension of trutn vary with every 
 modification of society, and with every progress of 
 knowledge. What exact degree of revelation, there- 
 fore, is adapted to meet the circumstances and wants 
 of our nature, under all its possible varieties of aspect, 
 is a problem much too intricate for mortal wisdom to 
 solve. The divine mind, which knows all the internal 
 machinery of our hearts, is alone equal to that task. 
 One thing, however, even we may venture to assert, 
 namely, that the brightest effulgence of revealed truth 
 is not fitted for the earliest and rudest state of human 
 existence. Under such circumstances neither could its 
 momentous value be duly appreciated, nor its records 
 adequately and correctly transmitted, to succeeding 
 times. The very immensity of the importance of 
 Christianity, then, as a final and complete system of 
 revelation, would obviously seem to require that its 
 first communication to mankind should have been 
 postponed until the world, from the more advanced 
 state of knowledge, should be prepared to receive it. 
 But, upon this supposition, what might not be the 
 pernicious effects produced by a total suspension of 
 the communication of Divine knowledge upon the 
 religious habits of society in the ages antecedent to 
 such a communication ! We know sufficiently, from 
 past history, to what a thoroughly debasing state of 
 irreligion and idolatry the human mind necessarily 
 descends, in the absence of the adventitious help of 
 revelation. Here, then, appears the absolute neces* 
 sity of some intermediate form of revelation, of some 
 provisional system less perfect than that destined 
 ultimately to supersede it, but still worthy^ of Dhrine 
 7 
 
74 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 providence, and vv^ell adapted to cooperate with tbe 
 existing state of knowledge, and the varied grada- 
 tions of society, in the earlier portion of man's history . 
 Such an arrangement, admitting the Divine origin 
 and the correctness of the history of Christianity, we 
 should naturally look for, and such an arrangement, 
 the Old Testament assures us, did accordingly exist. 
 But the system pursued by Providence is always one 
 of strict uniformity with itself, and the leading cha- 
 racteristic of that uniformity is the availing itself of 
 the operation of secondary causes, so long as those 
 causes are adequate, for the accomplishment of its 
 purpose. Even in a system, therefore, of positive 
 miraculous interventions, we should, in reason, ex- 
 pect to find no gratuitous or superfluous display of 
 miracles. This, again, accords exactly with what we 
 read in Scripture. The light of true religion was not 
 allowed to become extinct during the long course of 
 ages which preceded Christianity, but still the strict 
 necessity of the case was the measure of the actual 
 deviation from the ordinary course of natural events. 
 This remark will serve to account for, and to justify, 
 that appearance of partiality in the selection of indi- 
 vidual persons and tribes, as the vehicles of revelation, 
 which characterizes the earlier recorded intercourse 
 of God with his creatures. In the antediluvian and 
 patriarchal ages religion could have been diffused 
 over the whole human race, only by a series of con- 
 tinuous miracles, inconsistent, so far as we judge, 
 with the usual purposes of the Divine government. 
 On the other hand, the selection of first a single 
 family, and afterwards of a single nation, as the de- 
 positaries of religious knowledge, appears to be a far 
 less startling deviation from the usual order of nature, 
 whilst, from the singleness of purpose, of which such 
 an arrangement was more peculiarly capable, it was 
 likely to be more efficient for the preservation and 
 accurate transmission of those truths, the perpetua- 
 ting of which was so essentially important. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 75 
 
 If, however, there is nothing repugnant to reason 
 in the supposition that certain individuals, in the 
 earlier period of the world, might have been selected 
 as instruments for the guardianship of revealed truth, 
 it would also appear probable, that the rule which 
 would direct the choice of this or that person would 
 not be merely the moral excellence of the parties thus 
 chosen, but also their peculiar fitness, from other 
 adventitious circumstances, for the task thus entrusted 
 to them. This observation, if correct, will serve to 
 explain some apparent anomalies in Scripture, result- 
 ing from what is there related of the characters of 
 some of the influential personages whose history it 
 records. It is reasonable, indeed, to suppose, that the 
 Divine Being, in making his selection of the persons 
 whom he destined to be the depositaries of his will, 
 would give the preference to those whose piety and 
 ^ood conduct would seem specially to entitle them to 
 hat high distinction. And such, in fact, appears to 
 ave been the case, with regard to his choice of the 
 rst founders of the Israelitish nation. In the cir- 
 imstances related of Abraham, we recognise the 
 aces of one of the most singularly amiable and 
 ous dispositions on record. Of Isaac little is related, 
 It that little is calculated to afford the same favour- 
 le impression of his character; and if in the early 
 5tory of Jacob we cannot but recognise some traits 
 (. human infirmity, all that is recorded of the latter 
 p "iod of his life is, at all events, precisely such as 
 y\ can imagine to be likely to conciliate the Divine 
 fa our. Still, however, we should recollect, that both 
 thi se men and their descendants were, in fact, only 
 the machinery by which the Almighty accomplished 
 his will, and that the distinction thus conferred upon 
 them had not any necessary and inseparable reference 
 to their personal deserts. This observation, so far 
 as it regards the Jews, the Old Testament, with a 
 remarkable caution, as if specially to guard against 
 the possibility of misapprehension, repeats again and 
 
76 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 again, reminding them that they were a stiff-necked 
 generation, chosen for no merit of their own, but 
 merely as instruments in the hand of Divine power, 
 raised up for a specific purpose, and forming, almost 
 unconsciously, a necessary link in the chain of the 
 arrangements of Providence. The degree to which 
 this unquestionable fact has been overlooked by the 
 enemies of Christianity, is another strong proof, out 
 of the many, of the extreme unfairness with which 
 infidelity has brought its charges against revelation. 
 It is in vain that Scripture deprecates this misappli- 
 cation of its doctrine; that it asserts the absolute 
 equality and impartiality of God's moral government, 
 and that it relates from time to time the tremendous 
 penal inflictions which befel these seemingly favoured 
 men, where their moral demerits called down the 
 visitation. The handle is too plausible a one for 
 the adversaries of revealed truth to relinquish, and 
 they have, accordingly, down to our own time, uni» 
 formly availed themselves of it: with what regard to 
 accuracy and legitimate argument, let those judge 
 who have most anxiously studied that mysterious 
 volume so much calumniated, but so little understood. 
 Granting, then, the necessity of a series of pro- 
 visional and comparatively imperfect revelations of 
 the Divine will prior to the full developement of 
 Christianity, and assuming, as we have done through 
 the whole of the preceding argument, that God's 
 ordinary course of proceeding is that of availing him- 
 self of the established course of secondary causes, 
 and even of turning the bad passions of mankind to 
 account for the production of good, and the further- 
 ance of his own gracious designs, we surely cannot 
 but remark a consistency, and a strong confirmatory 
 internal evidence, in those peculiar modes of revela* 
 tion which the more ancient historical books of the 
 Old Testament assert to have taken place in the 
 early ages : a consistency, because it accords exactly 
 wiln what we have every reason to infer of the deal- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 77 
 
 ings of Providence at the present moment; and an 
 internal evidence, because, though we conceive the 
 system pursued to be entirely in harmony with the 
 real order of the universe, we admit it to be unlike 
 what any inventor of a fictitious revelation would be 
 disposed to have suggested as probable. There is a 
 homeliness in the aspect of real truth which almost 
 always startles us at the first aspect. It is only upon 
 collecting our thoughts, and taking into consideration 
 the whole bearing of the case, that we begin to see 
 its appositeness and intrinsic superiority to those 
 delusive creatures of our own imaginations, which 
 are so apt to impose themselves upon us as philoso- 
 phical principles. The question, then, now before 
 us is simply this. The sceptic objects to the Holy 
 Scriptures that they describe the Almighty as spe- 
 cially protecting, for a long succession of ages, select 
 bodies of men who, for aught that we can perceive, 
 had little in their personal characters to recommend 
 them to his favour above others, whom the sacred 
 historian passes over in silence. Even supposing 
 that we assent to the accuracy of his statement thus 
 far, we entirely deny the inference which he would 
 derive from it. We reply, that he himself, if he be 
 really a Theist, acknowledges the existence, at this 
 moment, of an all-wise and benevolent Ruler of the 
 universe, and we challenge him to try revelation by 
 the same test which he applies to the existing order 
 of nature. Does he profess to doubt whether it can 
 be consistent with the Divine perfection to bring 
 about its ultimate purposes by what we call natural 
 causes, and to avail itself of human passions, and 
 even the incidental infirmities of human nature for 
 the procuring of ultimate benefits ? We repeat, that 
 the whole chain of history, modern as well as ancient, 
 secular as well as scriptural, answers this question, 
 respecting the mode of God's government, in the 
 affirmative. It is no j ustification of human guiltiness 
 that the worst vices of mankind have often, in direct 
 7* 
 
78 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 opposition to the intention of the parties, led to most 
 oeneficial effects upon society; but we know that 
 such have been the hinges upon which some of the 
 great influential epochs of human improvement have 
 turned. " It is necessary that offences should come, 
 but wo unto them by whom they come." Such is 
 the language of the book of revelation, whidi on this 
 point accords exactly with the book of nature. Few 
 stronger proofs, perhaps, of the predominance of the 
 good over the evil principle in the regulation of the 
 universe can be quoted, than this very tendency, by 
 which beneficial results are often seen to emanate 
 from the most apparently deleterious causes. Ad- 
 mitting that the Divine mind presides over, and 
 directs the current of human events (and on this 
 point the theistical sceptic and the Christian are alike 
 agreed,) what difference can it make with reference 
 to that substantial fact, in what form of words we 
 enunciate it as a certain proposition ; whether we 
 say with the secular historian, that particular events 
 followed particular causes, or with the inspired pen- 
 man, that God raised up this or that individual, this 
 or that nation, for the special accomplishment of his 
 will ? If we see nothing to stagger our reliance upon 
 the Divine goodness in the fact that the vices of the 
 Roman conclave raised up a Luther, or that the 
 licentious passions of Henry VIII. planted the Pro- 
 testant Reformation in England, why should we be 
 offended if we find revelation, when giving the de- 
 tails of the government of the same Almighty Being, 
 recognising a principle which presents no handle 
 for censure, when considered as a branch of natural 
 theology ? 
 
 " If plagues or earthquakes break not heaven's design, 
 Why then a Borgia, or a Catiline 1 
 Who knows but lie, whose hand the lightning formsy 
 Who heaves old Ocean, and who wings the storms, 
 Pours fierce ambition in a Caesar's mind, 
 Or turns young Ammon loose to scourge mankind?'* 
 
 Whea Bolingbroke suggested to Pope the sentiment 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 79 
 
 contained in the foregoing lines, in support of his 
 theory of natural religion, he saw nothing in it which 
 his reason did not assent to. It was only when he 
 came to turn his attention to the evidences of revela- 
 tion that he perceived, or fancied that he perceived, 
 its unsoundness. 
 
 It is in vain, then, for the deistical impugners of 
 Scripture to profess to be offended by the admitted 
 vices of the Jewish people, or of some'of the remark- 
 able personages recorded in Holy Writ, as inconsistent 
 with the moral attributes of that Providence which is 
 there declared to have raised them to a high state of 
 temporal elevation, so long as they confine themselves 
 to that single charge. Were they, indeed, able to 
 point out in the sacred writings, anyone line express- 
 ing approbation of those vices, or attempting to throw 
 a veil over the occasional imperfections of even the 
 more brilliant characters of the inspired history, the 
 objection would be undoubtedly fatal. The direct 
 contrary is, however, notoriously the case. That 
 revelation gives an impartial portraiture of poor infirm 
 human nature is perfectly true, and the faithfulness 
 of the resemblance to what we have all experienced, 
 is a strong confirmation of the authenticity of the 
 description. True, indeed, it is that the successive 
 events there related are given simply and undis- 
 guisedly, as they appear to have occurred, precisely 
 as those of any other class of human beings, might be 
 delineated by their respective historians ; but the 
 narrative has this peculiarity, which, without dero- 
 gating from its accuracy, distinguishes it from all other 
 historical records whatever ; it never loses sight of the 
 great fact of a Providence which superintends all human 
 events : a fact, we repeat, which, if secular writers 
 believe in, they have no right to adduce as an argu- 
 ment against Scripture, and which if they do not 
 believe, then they do not come within that description 
 of persons to whom the present course of argument 
 is addressed. 
 
80 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 Can, then, the sceptic produce an instance in which 
 the sacred writings speak of any positive deviation 
 from the rules of morality in any other terms than 
 those of censure ? That he can do so, we expressly 
 deny. Would he allege as an instance in point, the 
 intended sacrifice of Isaac by his father Abraham ? — 
 for even that noble and affecting example of holy 
 faith has been calumniated as a trait of ignorant and 
 sanguinary superstition. The answer here is obvious. 
 If Scripture be really what it asserts itgelf to be, the 
 word of God, the morality of this specific case at 
 once establishes itself by the mere statement of the 
 fact. Nothing can be more palpably certain, than 
 that He, who is the great author of life, has an un- 
 doubted right to resume his own gift; and, conse- 
 quently, that not only was that act of unshrinking 
 obedience meritorious in Abraham, as a proof of his 
 faith, but also that an exactly similar line of conduct 
 would, at this moment, be imperative upon ourselves, 
 provided the command could be as certainly and 
 explicitly conveyed to us in our own case as we believe 
 it to have been to him in his. Here the only point 
 at issue is, as to the degree of proof of the reality of 
 the Divine commission : admit that, and the scrip- 
 tural inference follows as a matter of course. 
 
 The sanguinary executions inflicted upon the 
 idolatrous Canaanites again have been dwelt upon 
 with persevering acrimony of vituperation by those 
 who would prove the Scriptures of the Old Testament 
 to be the production of a barbarous and cruel period, 
 and obviously unworthy of their assumed Divine 
 origin. Here the fallacy, as in the case of so many 
 other questions of this nature, depends entirely upon 
 a garbled and imperfect statement of the facts. If 
 the Israelites received no commission to inflict these 
 tremendous punishments upon their neighbours, then, 
 indeed, the charge against the Deity falls to the 
 ground, but upon that supposition the Scriptures have 
 misstated the fact, and the Israelites themselves 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 81 
 
 deserve the deepest reprobation. If, however, on 
 the other hand, the assertion of a special commission 
 from the Almighty, for that purpose, has been cor- 
 rectly made, that admission at once justifies the fact. 
 Here, again, we refer the consistent Deist, to his own 
 principles. Granting that the destruction of the 
 Canaanitish idolaters must be referred directly to 
 God himself, and not merely to the appointed instru- 
 ments of his will, it remains for the unbeliever to 
 show in what single circumstance this occurrence 
 morally differs from other undoubted acts of Divine 
 Providence, where, for some great and perhaps un- 
 traceable purpose, the engines of destruction have 
 been extensively employed. Looking to the sacred 
 historian, why does the opponent of Christianity, 
 whilst he makes this specific charge, neglect to in- 
 clude, in the same censure, the almost entire extirpa- 
 tion of the human race, by the universal deluge, or 
 the overthrow of Sodom, Gomorrah, and the sur- 
 rounding cities? Looking to secular history, how 
 does he account for the occasional visitations of 
 pestilence, of famine, of earthquakes ? How does 
 he reconcile with the government of a wise and bene- 
 volent ruler of the universe, the destruction of Pom- 
 peii, of Herculaneum, of Stabii, in ancient times, and 
 of Messina and Lisbon in modern ? Will he argue, 
 that it aggravates the charge against Scripture, that 
 the Canaanites are declared to have been justly pun- 
 ished for their crimes^ whilst we know of no peculiar 
 enormities, beyond those attaching to their neigh- 
 bours, which we can lay to the account of the last- 
 mentioned cities, which have been thus consigned to 
 destruction ? Again we repeat, the interposition of 
 the mysterious veil which, in modern times, screens 
 from our view the direct workings of the Deity, and 
 obliges us to refer the course of events to contingent 
 and secondary causes, makes no real difference in the 
 practical argument. What is certainly true of the 
 God of nature, is as assuredly true of the God of the 
 
82 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 Scriptures. If, notwithstanding the startling char- 
 acter of surrounding circumstances, the philoso- 
 phical rationalist can maintain his faith in the former 
 unshaken, he cannot, consistently with his own creed, 
 impugn the dispensations of the latter. 
 
 But let us examine this charge, which, by some 
 persons, is thought so seriously to shake the authority 
 of revelation, more in detail. The believer in Chris- 
 tianity maintains that it was absolutely necessary, 
 for the general welfare of mankind, that the last 
 remnant of the only true religion upon earth should 
 be kept from total extinction, either by the operation 
 of one continued miracle, or by the cooperation of 
 secondary causes, during that dark and protracted 
 period which was destined to intervene between the 
 first settlement of the Israelites in Palestine, and the 
 eventual promulgation of the covenant of the Gospel. 
 The prevention of the contagion of idolatry by the 
 extinction of the idolaters, he contends, was the only 
 really efficacious means for attaining this end, and 
 thus demonstrates, in the first place, the expediency 
 of the measures recorded to have been adopted. 
 That those measures were consistent with the rules 
 of morality, and with the Divine justice, he proves, 
 in the next place, by referring to the numerous acts 
 of infanticide, the human sacrifices, and other fearful 
 abominations, acknowledged to have been practised 
 by that denounced people ; and lastly, that the mea- 
 sure now under discussion was not a deviation from 
 the usual course of the government of Providence, he 
 shows, by referring to the extensive inflictions which, 
 on other occasions, and even within our own times, 
 have been allowed to befal various portions of the 
 human race. Unless the Deist can point out a sub- 
 stantial distinction between the admissions contained 
 in his own mode of belief, and these assumptions from 
 Scripture, his argument obviously proves nothing. 
 But, neither is the whole of his objections, nor the 
 whole of our vindication of this portion of revelation, 
 
€TTiriv»ESi 
 
 WITH HUMAN REASO] 
 
 cotiiprehended in the preceding remarfes. He argues, 
 that the making any set of human beings delegated 
 commissioners for the execution of the divine judg- 
 ments, especially in the case of the speculative points 
 of theology, is, in itself, such a handle afforded to 
 religious persecution, that we cannot conceive so 
 dangerous a doctrine to have proceeded from the 
 hallow^ed source of inspiration. To this we answer 
 that the precedent here supposed could be in point 
 only upon the recurrence of exactly similar circum- 
 stances, and in the case of a special Divine warrant; 
 but the forraer of these suppositions implies an impos- 
 sibility, the latter an extreme improbability. Oa 
 slighter grounds than these, no real Christian would, 
 any more than the philosophical Theist, advocate the 
 right of extirpating by the sword erroneous doctrines 
 of religion. But it will be said that the parties 
 deputed on this occasion, as the ministers of ven- 
 geance, were themselves nearly equally culpable with 
 the very idolaters (and even in the self-same acts of 
 irreligion) for whose punishment they were sent. 
 Admitting this assertion to be correct, which, how- 
 ever, remains to be proved, still, if it mean any thing, 
 it would show that, as all human beings are liable 
 to error, therefore no human beings are capable, in 
 strict justice, of receiving a commission for inflicting 
 any penal retribution upon others. Here, again, we 
 appeal to those principles of common usage and obvi- 
 ous expediency, admitted equally by both parties. 
 Can the objector, in this case, recal to his recollec- 
 tion no instances perfectly accordant with the sound- 
 est reason and policy, of civil or military discipline, 
 where one peccant individual is made, for the sake 
 of the example which it affords to himself, the instru- 
 ment of punishment upon his more culpable confede- 
 rates ? It has been uniformly asserted through the 
 whole of the preceding arguments, and we see no 
 reason for being ashamed of the doctrine, that the 
 mode of Divine government, with reference to man- 
 
S4 CONSISTENCY 01' REVULATtON 
 
 kind, as revealed to us in Scripture, is ever found to 
 be in strict conformity and adaptation to the ma- 
 chinery of human passions. In other words, that 
 God's dealings with mankind are fitted for mankinds 
 The mere punishment of the Canaanitish idolaters, 
 we have reason to believe, was not the sole nor the 
 main object of the awful executions now alluded to. 
 Other nations, both in ancient and modern times, 
 have, we know, grievously sinned as they had done, 
 and yet have been allowed to await the ordinary and 
 procrastinated course of the Divine judgments. The 
 real end aimed at on that occasion was, no doubt, 
 the warning and example afforded by these means to 
 the wavering Israelites themselves. And most fear- 
 ful and appalling must that example have proved to 
 their own chid^ing consciences. Whether the lesson 
 thus practically taught them, respecting the grievous 
 crime of idolatry, was more severe than the actual 
 circumstances required, is best shown by considering 
 to what degree, after all, they did really escape the 
 contagion of irreligion, communicated by their neigh- 
 bours. Now we know that the apostasy of even 
 these choseri delegates of Divine retrihution was, at 
 several periods of their history, all but complete. 
 As, during their wanderings in the desert, they looked 
 back, with regret and longing, to the coarse servile 
 fare of Egypt, so, during a large portion of their resi- 
 dence in the promised land, they envied and imitated 
 the gross worship of their idolatrous neighbours, and 
 were retained within the limits of something resem- 
 bling the pure religion taught from Mount Sinai, 
 only by an external circumvallation of rites, and 
 isolating usages, too well contrived for -even their 
 wayward obstinacy to break through. In the latter 
 period of their history, immediately preceding the 
 Chaldean captivity, to such an extent had the princi- 
 ple of irreligion prevailed, that if a remnant of true 
 believers still existed, it was a remnant in the strictest 
 application of the term ; men chased from society, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 85 
 
 and herding in woods and rocks, from the persecution 
 of their apostate sovereigns. Still it is remarkable 
 that the surrounding darkness never completely closed 
 over that remarkable country^ to the total ecclinction of 
 the light from heaven. The machinery employed by 
 Providence for the furtherance of its purpose exactly 
 •performed the work required and no more. Had one 
 degree less of severity been adopted, had the Mosaic 
 ritual been rendered less exclusive, and the spirit of 
 nationality less earnestly forced upon them, it cannot 
 be doubted but that the principle of evil would have 
 finally prevailed over them, and our blessed Saviour, 
 at his coming, would have had to preach the holy 
 doctrines of the Gospel to a people unimbued with 
 the first notions of sound theism. "When ye oJfTer 
 your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through 
 the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even 
 Unto this day. And shall I be inquired of by you, O 
 house of Israel ? As I live, saith the Lord God, I 
 will not be inquired of by you. And that which cometh 
 into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, We wilt 
 be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve 
 wood and stone* As I live, saith the Lord God, surely 
 with a mighty hand, and a stretched out arm, and witn 
 fury poured out, ivill 1 rule over you." Before, then, 
 we charge the denunciations of the Mosaic code 
 against acts of idolatry, as sanguinary and unjustifia- 
 ble, or its ceremonial institutions, for the furtherance 
 of the same object, as vexatious and trifling, let it at 
 least be shown, that a slighter effort, on the part of 
 the legislator, would have attained the required object. 
 If this cannot, as assuredly it cannot, be proved, then 
 the only conclusion to which we can arrive, from the 
 whole bearings of the case, is, that after all, the means 
 adopted were only just adequate to the emergency, 
 and that what has been set up as an accusation against 
 the truth of revelation on this occasion is, in reality, 
 an additional argument of the wisdom in which its 
 various integral parts have been arranged. 
 8 
 
86 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER X. 
 
 Of the Moral Tendency of the Levitical Institutiong. 
 
 But the defender of the inspiration of the Mosaic 
 Writings will not be content to rest his cause solely 
 upon exculpatory arguments. Those compositions 
 profess to be the dictation of almighty wisdom ; and 
 if that assertion be correct, we may reasonably expect 
 to find, in the character of their precepts, some inter- 
 nal proof and indication of the pure source from which 
 they emanated. Now, on this point, the course be- 
 fore us is an easy one. Christianity, we know, was 
 not introduced into the world until after the expira- 
 tion of at least four thousand years from the time 
 of its creation. During that long period, with the 
 single exception of the patriarchal families, previous 
 to the era of Moses, and of the Jewish nation, sub- 
 sequently to that time, the human mind had to form 
 its own opinions upon the great questions of religion 
 and morals, from the conclusions of the light of nature 
 only, unless we admit also the not improbable sup- 
 position, that some remnants of original tradition 
 contributed their aid towards the formation of the 
 schools of ancient philosophy. Let, then, the infidel 
 give us, in support of our argument, the single book 
 of the Old Testament, or even the writings of Moses 
 only, and let him take the full benefit of all the occa- 
 sional sublime morality, and all the theology, which 
 he can find in the works of the philosophers and 
 moralists of heathenism, from the earliest period of 
 history down to that of the ministry of Christ. No 
 doubt he will find there much which every Christian 
 will admire and approve, for we have St. PauPs own 
 warrant for the assertion, that there was enough of 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 87 
 
 soundness in the wisdom of those remarkable men, 
 to render the plea of ignorance unavailable to those 
 who, notwithstanding such helps, continued in the 
 commission of sin. Still, however, we may confi- 
 dently challenge the Augustan age itself to produce, 
 if it can, by selection from all the works of all the 
 ancients, a code of morals and theology, at all ap- 
 proaching in excellence to that contained in the single 
 law of Moses, written, be it remembered, almost in 
 the world's very infancy, and when Greece and Italy 
 lay, as yet, immersed in the deepest barbarism. Had 
 we, in fact, nothing to produce but the Decalogue 
 itself, we should feel no anxiety for the issue of the 
 challenge. It may be said, indeed, with reference to 
 this last observation, that the doctrine of the unity of 
 the Godhead, and the great laws of social morality, 
 may be found as fully and explicitly stated in the 
 works of the better heathen ethical writers, as in 
 those Two Tables. But, admitting that the more 
 obvious injunctions and prohibitions may be as clearly 
 expressed elsewhere, the existence of the second and 
 tenth commandments would, we think, completely 
 bear out our case. Other legislators may have as- 
 serted the unity of the supreme Being, and his claim 
 to priority of worship : but we very much doubt 
 whether any precept, excepting that of Moses, can be 
 quoted, which anticipates the first commencing germ 
 of the principle of idolatry within the heart, by point- 
 ing out and guarding against the tendency to poly^ 
 theism, produced by the toleration of a more limited 
 veneration of inferior beings ; or which, after de- 
 nouncing the various overt acts of positive and prac- 
 tical immorality, proceeds to subject the mere latent 
 wish, the unripened, and, as yet, unoperative desire 
 to the same uncompromising censure. We learn, 
 from Josephus, the strong effect produced upon the 
 Jewish nation, even at the latter period of their ex- 
 istence, by the prohibitive injunction of the second 
 commandment of the Decalogue, in the case of the 
 
88 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 resistance which they made to the innovations of 
 Herod, upon the mere introduction by him of trophies, 
 bearing a very rude resemblance to the human form, 
 within the walls of Jerusalem ; and we cannot but 
 contrast the beneficial result of this feeling of extreme 
 caution on so nice a point in that people, with the 
 gross abuses which have eventually attended seem- 
 ingly harmless deviations from the strictness of this 
 rule in the instance of the Church of Rome. It was 
 surely no human wisdom which, at so early and 
 dark an era as that of Moses, detected one of the most 
 deceitful principles of the human breast, and antici- 
 pated the coming mischief by a cautious and effectual 
 prospective enactment. Let us take another instance 
 in point. Even in the writings of Cicero w^e find the 
 Stoic Balbus introduced, as maintaining the theory 
 of the divine nature of the sun, and the other heavenly 
 bodies, and of their claim to our reverence as such. 
 Such Avas the purest form of theology at Rome, at 
 a period little antecedent to our Saviour's nativity. 
 Nor can any one read the alleged conversations of 
 that truly remarkable man now alluded to, with his 
 contemporary philosophers, on these sublime sub- 
 jects, without perceiving how much more the great 
 questions of religion appear to have been considered 
 by them rather as matters of curious and abstract 
 discussion, than as any thing in which they, as re^ 
 sponsible beings, had a vested and most momentous 
 interest. In opposition to such cold and unprofitable 
 skirmishing of the intellect, let us quote the surpris- 
 ingly vivid and soul-stirring appeal of the Jewish 
 legislator on this self-same point. " Behold, I have 
 taught you statutes and judgments, even as the Lord 
 my God commanded me, that ye should do so in the 
 land whither ye go to possess it. Keep, therefore, 
 and do them, for this is your wisdom and understand- 
 ing in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all 
 these statutes, and say. Surely this great nation is 
 a wise and understandmg people, For what nation 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 89 
 
 is there so great, which hath God so nigh unto them, 
 as the Lord our God is in all things that we call upon 
 him for? And what nation is there so great, and 
 hath statutes and judgments so righteous, as all this 
 law which I set before you this day ? Only take 
 heed to thyself, and keep thy soul diligently, lest 
 thou forget the things which thine eyes have seen, 
 and lest they depart from thy heart all the days of thy 
 life : but teach them thy sons and thy son's sons. 
 Specially the day that thou stoodest before the Lord 
 thy God in Horeb, when the Lord said unto me. 
 Gather me the people together, and I will make them 
 hear my words, that they may learn to fear me all 
 the days that they shall live upon the earth, and that 
 they may teach their children. And ye came near 
 and stood under the mountain, and the mountain 
 burned with fire unto the midst of heaven, with dark- 
 ness, clouds, and thick darkness. And the Lord 
 spake unto you out of the midst of the fire. Ye 
 heard the voice of the words, but saiv no similitude: 
 only ye heard a voice. And he declared unto you 
 his covenant, which he commands you to perform, 
 even ten commandments, and he wrote them upon 
 two tables of stone. And the Lord commanded me 
 at that time to teach you statutes and judgments, 
 that ye might do them in the land whether ye go over 
 to possess it. Take ye, therefore, good need unto 
 yourselves ; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the 
 day that the Lord spake unto me in Horeh, out of the 
 midst of the fire, lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make 
 you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the 
 likeness of male or female, the likeness of any beast that 
 is on the earth, the likeness of any winged fowl that flieth 
 in the air ; the likeness of any thing that creepeth on the 
 ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the waters 
 beneath the earth, and lest thou lift up thine eyes unto 
 heaven, and when thou seest the sun and the moon and 
 the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven 
 to worship them, and serve them, which the Lord thy 
 8* 
 
90 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 God hath divided unto all nations under the whole 
 heaven."'*'' 
 
 " Crudele gladiatorum spectaculum et inhumanum 
 nonnullis videri solet, et hand sew an ita sit ut nunc 
 fit," is again the cold-blooded remark of the above- 
 mentioned accomplished Roman philosopher, on the 
 subject of the atrocious amusements of the amphi- 
 theatre, at the period of Rome's highest state of social 
 refinement. Compare with this the following noble, 
 sublime, and beautiful passages from the Mosaic 
 writings: ''Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man 
 shall his blood be shed."t " When ye reap the har- 
 vests of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the 
 corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the 
 gleanings of thy harvest ; and thou shalt not glean 
 thy vineyard : — thou shalt leave them for the poor 
 and stranger. I am the Lord your God. Thou shalt 
 not defraud thy neighbour, neither rob him : the wages 
 of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all 
 night until the morning. Thou shalt not curse the 
 deaf, nor put a stumbling-block before the blind, but 
 shalt fear thy God. I am the Lord. Ye shall do 
 no unrighteousness in judgment ; thou shalt not re-« 
 spect the person of the poor, nor honour the person 
 of the mighty, but in righteousness shalt thou judge 
 thy neighbour. Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any 
 grudge against the children of thy people, but thou 
 shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. I am the Lord."t 
 *' Thou shalt not see thy brother's ass or his ox fall 
 down by the way, and hide thyself from them ; thou 
 shalt surely help him to lift them up again. If a 
 bird's nest chance to be before thee in the way in 
 any tree, or on the ground, whether they be young 
 ones or eggs, and the dam sitting upon the young or 
 upon the eggs, thou shalt not take the dam with the 
 young ; but thou shalt in any wise let the dam go, 
 and lake the young to thee; that it may be well 
 
 • Deut. \v. tG«n. ix. 6. ^Lev. xlx. 
 
 M 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 91 
 
 with thee, and that thou mayest prolong thy days."* 
 " No man shall take the nether or the upper millstone 
 to pledge, for he taketh a man's life to pledge. When 
 thou dost lend thy brother any thing, thou shalt not 
 go into his house to fetch his pledge. Thou shalt 
 stand abroad, and the man to whom thou dost lend 
 shall bring out the pledge abroad unto thee. And if 
 the man be poor, thou shalt not sleep with his pledge : 
 in any case, thou shalt deliver him the pledge again 
 when the sun goeth down, that he may sleep in his 
 own raiment, and bless thee : audit shall be righteous- 
 ness unto thee before the Lord thy God, Thou shalt 
 not oppress an hired servant that is poor and needy, 
 whether he be of thy brethren, or of thy strangers that 
 are in thy land within thy gates. At his day shalt 
 thou give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down 
 upon it; for he is poor, and setteth his heart upon it : 
 lest he cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto 
 Jthee. Thou shalt not pervert the judgment of the 
 -stranger, nor of the fatherless, nor take the widow's 
 raiment to pledge ; but thou shalt remember that thou 
 wast a bondman in Egypt, and the Lord thy God 
 ^redeemed thee thence : therefore I command thee to 
 do this thing. When thou cuttest down thine harvest 
 in thy field, and hast forgot a sheaf in the field, thou 
 shalt not go again to fetch it ; it shall be for the stran- 
 ger, for the fatherless, and for the widow ; that the 
 Lord may bless thee in all the work of thine hands. 
 When thou beatest thine olive-tree, thou shalt not go 
 over the boughs again : it shall be for the stranger, 
 for the fatherless, and for the Avidow. When thou 
 gatherest the grapes of thy vineyard, thou shalt not 
 glean it afterward : it shall be for the stranger, for 
 the fatherless^ and for the widow; and thou shalt 
 remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of 
 Egypt, therefore I command thee to do this thing."t 
 There is no need of apology for the length of these 
 
 • Dcut. xjii. t Deut. xuiv. 
 
92 CONSISTENCT OF REVELATION 
 
 truly beautiful extracts. We will add one short pas- 
 sage more, which is remarkable, when we consider 
 the oppressive Egyptian bondage from which the 
 Israelites had recently escaped, for the truly Christian 
 feeling of generosity and forbearance which it ex- 
 presses. " Thou shah not abhor an Edomite, for he 
 is thy brother ; thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian, 
 because thou wast a stranger in his land.''^^ 
 
 It is quite impossible, we conceive, to read these 
 splendid touches of kindly feeling and sublime piety 
 without acknowledging their immeasurable superior- 
 ity to any of the most elaborate prqductions of Pagan 
 civilization. And if so, the inquiry, naturally fol- 
 lows, " To what are we to attribute this superiority ?" 
 Grant the inspiration of the passages in question, and 
 the diflficulty is at once removed. But without the 
 aid of this satisfactory solution, the exquisite morality 
 which marks these most ancient of all human composi- 
 tions must be admitted to present an anomaly which 
 it seems perfectly impossible to account for upon any 
 natural principle. 
 
 We may observe, also, as another striking internal 
 evidence of the authenticity of these singular records, 
 that the beauty of the religious and social principles 
 which they inculcate is in direct contrast with what 
 we find, from the same sources of information, to have 
 been the practical habits of the parties to whom they 
 were addressed. Highly wrought and delicate senti- 
 ments of humanity and of chastened piety appear, 
 in the ordinary course of natural events, only among 
 nations very far advanced in intellectual improve- 
 ment ; because such productions grow out of the exist- 
 ing state of knowledge and manners ; or where the 
 literature of the people outsteps, by any accident, the 
 habitual state of manners then prevalent, some traits 
 of the general barbarism are, at all events, distin- 
 guishable in it. But what we read in the books of 
 
 • Deut. xxiii, 7. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 93 
 
 Moses of the moral and intellectual attainments of the 
 Israelites has nothing which at all harmonizes, or is 
 in keeping with the sublimity of their religious code. 
 Now this singular contrast between the sacred litera- 
 ture of that nation, and the character of the nation 
 itself, is precisely what we might expect to find, pro- 
 vided their alleged history be the true one. A system 
 of laws emanating from Heaven must necessarily be 
 supposed to be consistent with the soundest principles 
 of virtue and holiness. But it by no means follows, 
 that the habits of a semi-barbarous and profligate 
 people would immediately conform to the restraint of 
 obligations, so unlike to any thing which constituted 
 their previous standard of morals. The accuracy then 
 of the picture afforded us by Moses on this occasion 
 is, according to the established presumption of the 
 inspired character of his writings, perfectly correct. 
 But how are we to explain the difficulty, if Ave deny 
 that inspiration? Assume, for argument's sake, that 
 Moses, like some other subsequent legislators, pos- 
 sessed an understanding far in advance of the pre- 
 valent notions of his own period. What, in that case, 
 could have been his motive for composing those his- 
 torical works which bear his name ? It is evident 
 that, had his object been merely to make out a plau- 
 sible case, and to recommend the merits of his own 
 legislation, it would never have occurred to him to 
 state those mortifying facts, which form so large a 
 part of the subject matter of his history, with that 
 plainness of narrative which we find that he has 
 actually adopted. No original projector, and, more 
 than any other person, no legislator, likes to record 
 the failure of his own experiments ; much less, if 
 writing a narrative of his attempts to renovate the 
 character of the people with whom he has to deal, 
 does he love to register his own personal defects, and 
 the cases in which he has drawn down the Divine 
 vengeance upon his own head. As it is, the Mosaic 
 writings present a true, unfortunately too true, por» 
 G 
 
94 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 traiture of the waywardness of huhaan nature, and of 
 the impenetrable surface presented by the heart of 
 man to the operation of the principle of holiness ; but 
 they suggest any idea rather than that of a success- 
 ful instructer of mankind attempting to exemplify the 
 importance of his own religious and moral precepts, 
 by showing their practical success in the amelioration 
 of the parties to whom they have been addressed. 
 
 But a principle of self-denial, and an unwilling- 
 ness to make the most of the means, obviously placed 
 within his reach, for the furtherance of his object, if 
 that object were to promote his own personal aggran- 
 dizement by the assumption of the legislative cha- 
 racter, pervades alike every part of the writings of 
 Moses. Arguing upon mere human feelings and 
 motives, this fact were perfectly inexplicable. The 
 silence, for instance, observed by him, with regard to 
 the hopes and fears of a future state, has given rise 
 to one of the most elaborate and ingenious arguments 
 contained in the whole compass of English literature. 
 And what makes his neglect of this great influential 
 argument the more remarkable, is the certainty of 
 the fact, as appears incidentally by his own allusions 
 to the sin of witchcraft and necromancy, that the 
 doctrine of the separate existence of the soul was 
 familiar to the minds of the people with whom he 
 had to deal. Why, then, did he abstain from urging 
 a dogma of which he could not be ignorant, and 
 which, as an inducement to obedience, is so far the 
 most powerful one that a legislator or moralist can 
 possibly advance ? Had self-interest or human policy 
 been his spring of action, it is quite impossible that 
 he should have exercised this forbearance. Admit- 
 ting, however, his inspiration to have been real, 
 this remarkable fact explains itself. This self-same 
 omission, which would present a strange anomaly 
 in any other code of religion and morals, is, if 
 Christianity be true, an absolutely necessary conse- 
 qoence of the peculiar relative position which Ju- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. % 
 
 daism held, as connected, prospectively, with the 
 covenant of the Gospel. If eternal life be (as we are 
 assured that it is) the exclusive result of the ex- 
 piatory sacrifice of Christ, communicated to mankind 
 through the medium of faith, it is evident that no 
 incomplete and merely preparatory system of doc- 
 trine could consistently hold out the promise of that 
 reward wh' h is reserved as the especial sanction of 
 the higher and more perfect revelation. " If," says 
 St. Paul, " there had been a law given which could 
 have given life, verily, righteousness should have been 
 by the law; but the Scripture hath concluded all 
 under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ 
 might be given to them that believe." Had, then, 
 Moses inserted in his own legal code a promise of 
 eternal salvation as the reward of obedience to its 
 injunctions, that very promise would be fatal to its 
 authority as an integral portion of the entire ma- 
 chinery of Divine revelation. Taking it, on the 
 other hand, precisely as we find it, the remarkable 
 omission now alluded to is a striking evidence of 
 the strict consistency of the-various component parts 
 of Scripture one with another, and consequently a 
 strong mternal confirmation of their joint authen- 
 ticity. 
 
 Another very remarkable instance of the forbear- 
 ance, and (if we were to suppose him to have been 
 actuated only by human motives) of what might be 
 justly deemed the imprudence and inconsistency of 
 Moses, may be observed in the fact, that though 
 legislating for an infant people, whose future national 
 character was intended to be moulded entirely upon 
 the pattern of his institutions, and doing so under the 
 alleged sanction of Divine dictation, he still asserts 
 the mere provisional character of his own institutions, 
 and expressly declares that they were to be eventually 
 superseded by the enactments of some future and 
 more perfect legislator. Here is a contradiction 
 which it were quite impossible to reconcile with any 
 
96 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 admitted and ordinary principles of action. "What 
 could possibly suggest to any reasonable person, pro- 
 fessing to be armed with the Divine authority, and 
 denouncing the most tremendous preternatural visita- 
 tions against any contingent breach of his enactments, 
 so strange an idea as that of asserting that, after all, 
 the rules which he thus peremptorily lays down are 
 destined to perish, not from the rnei^ destructive 
 influence of time, but from their own comparative 
 inferiority to others which are to be subsequently 
 introduced ? The anomaly, upon every view of the 
 question but one, is quite inexplicable. Admitting, 
 however, the truth of the whole series of revelation, as 
 contained in the entire Bible, not only are we obliged 
 to admit the necessity of such an explicit declaration ;■ 
 but, also, we cannot but be struck Avith the nicety and 
 delicacy of arrangement with which it is introduced^ 
 It was obviously desirable at the time of the first 
 promulgation of the Mosaic law, that no slur should 
 appear to be thrown upon the sanctity and solemnity 
 of an institution, which, however temporary in its 
 purpose, was still intended to form the habits and to 
 command the respect of the Israelites, for the space 
 of fifteen centuries, and, during that long period, to 
 serve as a substitute for the more spiritual dispensa- 
 tion, which was eventually destined to occupy its 
 place. Now, a prominent declaration of its merely 
 provisional character would have been, in great 
 measure, destructive of this necessary degree of 
 deferential respect ; and yet, on the other hand, had 
 it been held out as a system complete and perfect in * 
 itself, such an assertion would have been inconsistent 
 with the truth, whilst, also, it would have operated as 
 a complete vindication of the later Jews in their 
 eventual rejection of the promises of the Gospel. 
 This difficulty appears to have been met with that 
 exact degree of wise caution, which marks deliberate 
 and consistent contrivance. The introduction of the 
 Mosaic law, accordingly, was accompanied by thir 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON* 97 
 
 most astounding miracles, and its obligatory charac- 
 ter established under the most terrific sanctions ; and 
 yet the fact of its beioig intended as a provisional 
 substitute onljr for a covenant, which was ultimately 
 to supersede it, though never brought prominently 
 forward, is still announced with a sufficient precision 
 of assertion to produce conviction in the mind of any 
 person, who, not content with a mere general survey, 
 would take the trouble of examining its less palpable 
 declarations. In this circumstance we recognise the 
 usual characteristic of prophecy : that is to say, we 
 find a statement not calculated to attract much atten- 
 tion before its completion, and yet which, when com- 
 pleted, is found to be sufficiently precise to satisfy us 
 that its insertion was the result of deliberate fore- 
 knowledge. *= 
 
 * That the future advent of Christ was foretold by Moses, as well as 
 by the later prophets, is not an assumption derived from any forced and 
 over- ingenious construction of those parts of the Mosaic writings which 
 are thus interpreted by Christians. The Samaritans, who acknowledged 
 no canonical books besides the Pentateuch, looked forward to the coming 
 of the promised Messiah no less confidently than the more orthodox Jews^ 
 The inferences, therefore, which they derived from these respective 
 passages, were the same with our own. " I know,'' said the yoman of 
 Samaria, in conversation with our Lord, "that Messias cometh, which 
 is called Christ : when He is come, he will tell us all things." We find,^ 
 also, in another passage of St. John's gospel, the Apostle Philip bearing 
 a like testimony to the prophetic declaration of Moses on this point. 
 " Philip findeth Nathaniel, and saith unto him, We have found him of 
 whom Moses in the law and the prophets did write." And, yet, not- 
 withstanding this undoubted explicitness of allusion to that important 
 event, so guarded is the language of the several passages which bear upon 
 the point, that it may he doubted whether any person unacquainted with 
 the books of the New Testament, and perusing the Mosaic writings for 
 the first time, would necessarily be led by them to cherish the same an- 
 ticipation. That conclusion would, upon a repeated perusal, be probably 
 found to be a necessary one, but still it would require a certain effort o« 
 the attention, and a balancing of consequences, to arrive at it. 
 
y8 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER XL 
 
 Of the miraculous incidents recorded by Moses. 
 
 The many miraculous incidents which are so inse- 
 parably interwoven with the whole series of events 
 recorded in the historical books of the Old Testament, 
 and more especially in the writings of Moses, as to 
 leave no possibility of accounting for them from 
 natural causes, without destroying the whole history 
 itself, have ever, as a matter of course, been a mark 
 for the assaults and ridicule of infidelity. Nor is 
 this all. They have also been a subject of surprise 
 to many sincere believers in Christianity, under the 
 idea that, as the admitted system of Providence is 
 to govern the world by the operation of secondary 
 causes, such seemingly gratuitous instances of devia- 
 tion from that rule would appear at first sight to 
 convey the idea of the fictitious and exaggerated 
 traditions of a barbarian period, rather than of the 
 strictly accurate detail of real occurrences. But it 
 will be right, on this occasion, to observe, as a pre- 
 liminary fact, that with regard to the question respect- 
 ing the possibility or probability of miracles, it is not 
 within the power of even the strongest minds, at this 
 period of the world, to discuss the matter fairly. All 
 our established associations, derived from our un- 
 broken experience of the uniformity of the existing 
 operations of nature, are directly in the way of an 
 impartial conjecture as to what may, under peculiar 
 circumstances, and in a strong emergency, be most 
 probable in the dispensations of Providence. It is 
 a point completely established by metaphysicians, 
 that by a wise adaptation of the constitution of our 
 minds to the phenomena of the world in which we 
 are placed, we all of us have an instinctive tendency 
 to take as our standard of probability, with reference 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 99 
 
 to future events, our actual experience of the past, 
 and to judge of abstract possibilities solely by the 
 occurrences which have fallen within our own know- 
 ledge. This is not the place to dilate upon the process 
 of reasoning, upon which this axiom is founded, nor 
 upon the inference derived from it, which would seem 
 to establish, as a no less certain truth, our utter in- 
 competence to trace any connexion between cause 
 and effect in any natural incidents whatever. Suffice 
 it to observe, that this predisposition in the human 
 mind to scepticism, with regard to any deviation 
 from the usual course of nature, exists within us in- 
 dependently of our reason, and in spite of our reason ; 
 aad that though it has been given to us as a neces- 
 sary instinct for our practical welfare in the business 
 of this life, it is one against which we cannot be too 
 much on our guard the moment that we turn our 
 attention to the discussion of the transcendental topics 
 of theology. Whilst under the influence of such a 
 bias as that now alluded to, it is obviously impossible 
 that the miracles recorded in the inspired writings 
 should be perused by us without some occasional 
 misgivings as to the accuracy of the narrative. And 
 yet, at the same time, nothing can be more certain 
 than that this instinctive scepticism is itself founded 
 upon a fallacious, though to us almost inevitable, 
 process of reasoning. When we consider over how 
 very confined an area, even of things as they now 
 are, our own personal knowledge can at the utmost 
 extend, it were obviously the extreme height of pre- 
 sumption in us to assert, that because particular oc- 
 currences have not manifested themselves within our 
 own time, therefore, they not only have never taken 
 place in any other period of the world, but are actually 
 to be considered in the light of impossibilities. But 
 we need not .rest the credibility of revelation upon 
 this negative argument only. If our present expe- 
 rience tells us one thing respecting natural causes, 
 we may affirm with certainty, that past experience, so 
 
109 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 far as we can collect it from history or experimental 
 research into the phenomena of the globe, tells us 
 another. We ev^idently know nothing of the actions 
 and events of past times but from the records of con- 
 temporary writers, and those records expressly assert 
 'that deviations from what is now the established 
 course of nature did actually occur at the various 
 epochs to which many of those records refer. If we 
 are told that such testimony is insufficient, because 
 the admission of it would be to allow the assertions 
 of Scripture to prove themselves, and because the 
 events there alluded to were demonstrably impossible, 
 our answer is, that we have irrefragable proofs in the 
 book of creatitin itself, which the most determined 
 sceptic mast admit, that circumstances which would 
 now be deemed impossible have actually occurred at 
 no very remote period from our own time. No com- 
 bination of materials Avith which we are acquainted, 
 excepting the natural order of animal generation, 
 would, at this moment, produce the slightest approach 
 to organized life. Not a single feather, not a hair, 
 not a bone is now seen to originate from the spon- 
 taneous action of the elements; and yet we know 
 from positive research, that birds, quadrupeds, and 
 man, have been, at their respective periods, called 
 into being subsequently to the formation of the globe 
 which we inhabit, by some creative power, the peculiar 
 exercise of which seems to be no longer exhibited. 
 If we ask why animals are no longer produced by 
 some plastic energy of the vivifying principle, our 
 only answer can be, that for some reason unknown, 
 to us, the course of nature has undergone a change. 
 The negative argument then afforded by our own 
 actual experience of the existing order of things is 
 confessedly no refutation whatever of the preceding 
 supposition, supported as it is by incontrovertible 
 facts. 
 
 It is an obvious truth, though,, strange to say, con- 
 tinually overlooked in discussions of this nature, that 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 101 
 
 the existence of a creation necessarily implies a 
 Creator, and that if its subsequent ordinary duration 
 may be kept up by seemingly natural causes, the 
 energy to which it owed its first production must have 
 been, in the usual meaning of the term, miraculous, 
 that is to say, a deviation from what are now deemed 
 to be the established laws of Providence. This obser- 
 vation may be applied, with almost equal certainty 
 of inference, to the moral phenomena of human his- 
 tory as to the physical. Prominent and peculiar effects 
 in the circumstances of this or that nation must have 
 had their peculiar and efficient causes. That Chris- 
 tianity exists at this moment is a self-decisive proof 
 that events must have occurred at some definite period, 
 which gave that peculiar direction and impulse to the 
 human character. The same argument extends with 
 equal force to the point more immediately under dis- 
 cussion at this moment, namely, the early history of 
 the Jews. That singular people exists at the present 
 day as a numerous nation, scattered over almost every 
 region of the earth, all of them bearing the same tes- 
 timony respecting their first origin, and still practising, 
 so far as circumstances will allow, the very rites which 
 the Scriptures declare to have been ordained by Moses 
 upwards of 3000 years ago. Now, as effects cannot 
 exist without their respective causes, " whence, we 
 ask, did this strange community originate, if not from 
 the stock, and under the peculiar agency, to which all 
 existing records whatevei agree in referring them ?" 
 If the received history is false, what is the true one, 
 and where is it to be found ? Should we be told that 
 the books which relate the miraculous events, con- 
 nected with their first establishment as a people, are 
 the productions of a later period, calculated, like the 
 histories of other dark ages, to gratify national vanity, 
 by the relation of exaggerated or fictitious wonders : 
 the question then occurs, to what period we are to 
 aissign these several productions, and how we are to 
 ftccouot, not only for the disappearance of all the 
 9* 
 
102 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 really authenlic records, but for the substitution of 
 forged documents in their room, which, notwithstand- 
 ing, have been implicitly received as authentic by the 
 parties thus imposed on. Now, alloAving the utmost 
 possible latitude to the conjectures of scepticism on 
 this pomt, we have the strongest reasons for asserting 
 that the Mosaic writings were not only in existence, 
 but were acknowledged as ancient and authentic 
 documents, before the separation of the ten tribes 
 of Israel under Jeroboam from the two remaining 
 tribes of Judah and Benjamin. The 105th, 106th, 
 and 136th Psalms, which are little more than the 
 abridged details of those narratives, provided they 
 were really the composition of David, to whom uni- 
 form tradition has attributed them, would at once 
 warrant this conclusion. The 78th Psalm, a work 
 also of the same presumed date, affords a similar 
 evidence.^ But the history of those revolted tribes, 
 and of their successors, the Samaritans, supplies an 
 unanswerable argument on this point. That sepa- 
 ration, we know, took place during the reign of 
 Rehoboam, the son of Solomon. From that period 
 the most deadly hatred existed between these two 
 separated branches of the Israelitish family, and, ac- 
 cordingly, the subsequent prophetical writings, which 
 were received as inspired documents into the canon 
 of the two orthodox tribes of the kingdom of Judah, 
 were never acknowledged as such by their heretical 
 neighbours, the schismatics of Israel. Both parties, 
 however, received as authentic (with a few interpola- 
 tions, indeed, oil the part of the Samaritans, in con- 
 sequence of their political prejudices,) the writings of 
 Moses; a fact which would be perfectly inexplicable 
 in any other way than that of the supposition that 
 both equally believed them to be such at the time of 
 the commencement of their schism. But this suppo- 
 
 • In addition to the Psalms mentioned above, the 44th, 66th, 68th, 74th, 
 77th, 80th, 81st, 95th, 99th, 107th, 110th, 114th, I33d, and 135th, aU contain 
 distinct allusiona to soma of the facts related in the Mosaic history. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 103 
 
 sition at once carries the antiquity of those writings 
 far beyond the point of time to which most impugners 
 of their authority have been desirous of referring 
 them.* It is remarkable, that the modern descend- 
 ants of the ancient Samaritans still occupy the town 
 of Nablous, formerly Shechem, situated between 
 Mounts Ebai and Gerizim, where they were visited, 
 in the year 1823, by the Rev. W. Jowett, who gives 
 the following account of his conversation with their 
 priest. *' He (the priest) said they were all in expec- 
 tation of the Messiah — that the Messiah would be a 
 man, not the Son of God, and that this was the place 
 which he would make the metropolis of his kingdom : 
 this was the place of which the Lord had promised, 
 He would place his name there. We asked what 
 passages of the Pentateuch, according to their views, 
 spoke of the Messiah. He quoted, ' A prophet shall 
 the Lord your God raise up like unto 7ne, ^c*' This 
 promise of the Messiah was not fulfilled in Joshua, 
 lor he was not a prophet. Thursday, Nov. 20th 
 1823. — Early this morning, according to appointment, 
 we visited the Samaritan priest. We waited for him 
 some time, during which we placed in order our 
 Bibles, and selected some texts, on which we desired 
 to converse with him. At length he made his ap- 
 pearance, and accompanied us into the synagogue. 
 With great reverence, he produced the venerable 
 manuscript (the MS. of the law alluded to in Pri- 
 deaux's Connection, Part I. Book 2.,) which, he said, 
 was written by Abisha, grandson of Aaron, thirteen 
 years after the death of Moses, now three thousand 
 four hundred and sixty years ago. We were not per- 
 mitted to touch the sacred book, but only to look at 
 it, at about a foot distance. The page at which he 
 opened showed certainly a very ancient manuscript, 
 
 • The theory, that, the books which bear the name of Moges were, in 
 reality, a compilation made by Ezra after the Babylonish captivity, is 
 perfectly irreconcilable with the fact of the admission of the authenticity 
 of those books by the revolted inhabitants of Samaria. 
 
104 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 with the characters yet sufficiently distinct. He then 
 showed us another, of a similar form, apparently an 
 exact copy, which, he said, was eight hundred years 
 old. He also produced a few tattered leaves of Wal- 
 ton's Polyglott — part of Genesis. We asked if they 
 did not consider the books of Joshua and Judges as 
 Bacred, in the same manner as the Torah ; he repjied, 
 ' By no means : these two books we have, and we 
 reverence them ; but the Torah is our only sacred 
 book. Joshua was not a prophet, but the disciple of 
 a prophet; that is, of Moses.' We inquired in which 
 direction they turn their faces when they pray. He 
 waved his hand in the direction a little right of the 
 angle behind the altar, that is, nearly southward. In 
 this direction is the city of Luz, which was afterwards 
 called Bethel, the place which the Lord appointed to 
 set his name there. As to Jerusalem, they have no 
 respect for it as a holy city ; regarding the Jews as 
 their rivals, and speaking entirely in the spirit of the 
 woman of Samaria,^ Our fathers worshipped in this 
 mountain, ^^C't 
 
 It is superfluous to observe how exactly this state- 
 ment accords with the facts detailed in Scripture, 
 and how strongly it confirms the alleged antiquity 
 of the Mosaic books. It has been frequently, and 
 justly, remarked, that the circumstance of the Jews 
 being joint depositaries with the Christians of the 
 Scriptures of the Old Testament in general, is an 
 unanswerable evidence that those writings have not 
 been tampered with and altered by the latter. The 
 argument afforded in confirmation of the authenticity 
 of the Pentateuch, in particular, by this testimony of 
 a sect disposed to controvert that of every other por- 
 tion of the sacred canon, is precisely similar in kind, 
 and, as it appears to us, not less conclusive, with 
 jregard to the writings to which it refers. The pe- 
 
 • John iv. 20. 
 
 t JoweU^s Christian Researches in Syria and ike Holy Land, pp. 19$, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON- 105 
 
 culiar creed of this last lingering remnant of the ten 
 schismatic tribes, which is a natural result of the 
 events of their history, if that history be correctly 
 transmitted to us in the Old Testament, it would be 
 impossible to account for, on the opposite supposition 
 of that narrative being false. Admitting, however, its 
 accuracy, the antiquity of the Mosaic writings is at 
 once established, up to a period which scarcely leaves 
 room for the possibility even of their having been 
 nothing more than a successful forgery of some still 
 earlier epoch. The endeavour, therefore, to get rid 
 of the difficulty attending the admission of the 
 miraculous events of the Jewish history, by at once 
 denying their authenticity, will be found upon trial, 
 as in the case of all the other mysterious questions 
 of revelation, to introduce far greater perplexity than 
 it is calculated to remove. We can see, or at all 
 events, imagine, a sufficient reason why, in the course 
 of the dealings of a wise and merciful Providence, 
 such preternatural interferences should have been 
 allowed to occur ; but we can discover no end to the 
 embarrassment and entanglement which would be 
 the result of a system of general scepticism, or, in 
 other words, of a theory which would almost oblige 
 us to believe any thing, for no better purpose than that 
 of flattering us with the idea of believing nothing. 
 
 It cannot be too strongly impressed upon our minds 
 that, granting the mere fact of the genuineness of the 
 Mosaic writings, without insisting also upon their 
 inspiration, even that admission would involve, as a 
 necessary consequence, the reality of a large propor- 
 tion of the miracles there recorded. Moses could not, 
 like some modern fanatics, have been under a delu- 
 sion with regard to the reality of his mission, or of 
 the prodigies related respecting him. If he wrote 
 those books, he was either a deliberate impostor, or 
 a person really bearing God's commission, and endued, 
 upon special occasions, with perternatural power. 
 But we are not free to choose between even these 
 
106 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 alternatives. He could not have been an impostor if 
 he would. The very nature of the miracles related 
 of him, and by him, were such as to render all imposi- 
 tion impossible. The whole body of the Israelites 
 are asserted by him to have personally witnessed 
 deviations from the ordinary course of nature, on a 
 Bcale far too great to have been by any supposition 
 within the limits of unassisted agency to effect; and 
 an appeal is repeatedly made to their testimony for 
 the accuracy of the respective statements. The 
 infliction of the plagues upon the Egyptians, the pas- 
 sage of the Red Sea, the miraculous production of 
 water in the Desert, the thunders and lightnings of 
 Mount Sinai during the delivery of the law, the gift 
 of manna, and the dreadful judgment overtaking 
 Dathan and his accomplices, are all related, not as 
 events of remote occurrence, and such as might be 
 safely invented, when the production of all contra- 
 dictory testimony should have been rendered impos- 
 sible by the lapse of time ; but as facts, for which the 
 great mass of the nation could vouch, as having been 
 themselves eye-witnesses of their reality. In such a 
 case, there is no tenable middle position between 
 absolute denial of the truth of the whole narrative, 
 and its absolute admission in all its parts. Any 
 attempt, therefore, at accommodation of the circum- 
 stances related, with the more tranquil course of ordi- 
 nary nature, is as unphilosophical as it is unsafe. 
 True, indeed, it is, that the prodigies related are of 
 the most astounding description. No consistent 
 advocate of revelation would seek to gloss over this 
 fact. But after all, what does this prove, excepting 
 what every believer in Christianity is, upon principle, 
 bound to admit ? namely, that the production of that 
 mysterious system of redemption has been, of all the 
 works of Providence with which we are acquainted, 
 the most important in its nature, and, therefore, if we 
 may venture so to speak of Almighty agency, the 
 most elaborate in its contrivance and appointed 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON- 107 
 
 machinery. If our reason can see no possible means 
 of escaping from the recognition of the truth of the 
 inspired records, that same reason, then, must tell U3 
 that a dispensation so solemnly prepared, and so 
 consistently, so slowly, and so cautiously developed, 
 year after year, and century after century, must be 
 one, the paramount value oi which will be found to 
 justify the vast expenditure of means employed in its 
 production. In this view of the case, every miracle 
 recorded in the Old Testament is only an evidence 
 the more to the sanctity of the covenant of the Gos- 
 pel; and if so, let every well-wisher to that covenant 
 be careful how, in the vain hope of conciliating those 
 who are not to be conciliated, he adopts a course of 
 argument, the direct and obvious tendency of which, 
 indeed, is to attach suspicion to only one portion oi 
 the sacred writings, but which, if established, would 
 necessarily lower our estimate of them as a whole* 
 
 " Ne Deus intersit, nisi dignus vindlce nodus 
 Inciderit," 
 
 is a rule of far more momentous application than 
 that of mere literary criticism. None but the wildest 
 fanatic Avill be disposed to believe hastily in every 
 alleged deviation from the established laws of nature ; 
 but that man, on the other hand, must have imbibed 
 little of sound philosophy who, looking round upon 
 all the mysteries by which we are environed, would 
 pronounce such deviations to be impossible ; or, 
 taking into consideration the concurrent testimony of 
 past ages, to be, under befitting circumstances, im- 
 probable. Surely the legitimate and most probable 
 conclusion, in the face of such evidence as that ad- 
 duced in support of the scriptural miracles, is not, 
 that the facts are themselves untrue, but that the 
 motives for their occurrence were urgent in exact 
 proportion to what may be presumed of the general 
 unwillingness of the Creator to disturb those laws 
 which, in his wisdom, he has thought fit to impose 
 . upon his creation. 
 
108 CONSISTENCY OF EEVELATIOlT 
 
 CHAPTER Xn. 
 
 Of the internal Evidence of the Authenticity of the Books of MoseSf 
 and of the other Jewish Scriptures. 
 
 Bishop Watson has recorded an observation, made 
 by Sir Isaac Newton to Dr. Smith, Master of Trinity- 
 College, Cambridge, " that he found more sure marks 
 of authenticity in the Bible than in any profane history 
 whatever." To those vt^ho have been in the habit of 
 considering the books of the Holy Scriptures as a 
 mere tissue of astounding incidents, substantiated 
 only by a moderate weight of external evidence, this 
 assertion will appear in the highest degree para- 
 doxical. And yet it is one which every person will 
 feel the more disposed to admit, the more he ex- 
 amines and estimates the detail of those writings by 
 that intuitive apprehension, by which we all judge 
 instinctively of the truth or falsehood of any series of 
 facts which we hear related. Every one knows how 
 difficult it is to maintain such an entire consistency 
 through all the minor points of a fictitious narrative, 
 that no subsequent criticism should be able to detect 
 any incompatibility of fact, or confusion and contra- 
 diction in the delineation of character. This difficulty, 
 which increases in a compound proportion, according 
 to the length of the work in the hands of .a single 
 author, may and will amount to an actual impos- 
 sibility in the case of a variety of authors, each sepa- 
 rately contributing his share toward the construction 
 of one entire and consistent narrative, especially 
 where the facts to be related lie out of the ordinary 
 course of events. Where, then, as in the instance of 
 the historical books of the Old Testament, we find a 
 long succession of writers, living some of them at 
 remote int^^rvals from one another, each having their 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 109 
 
 separate and distinct objects in the composition of 
 their respective works, and yet producing, without 
 any seeming intentional combination, a series of 
 compositions, which, when joined together, form one 
 continuous and consistent whole ; in which no viola- 
 tion of unity, in the delineation of natural manners, 
 or of individual character, no contradictions of chro- 
 nology, no anomaly of cause and effect, from first to 
 last, can be detected ; where the latter works neces- 
 sarily presuppose the existence of the earlier, and the 
 earlier would be incomplete unless succeeded by the 
 latter ; whilst all alike anticipate the developement 
 of some future system, which has folloAved in the due 
 course of events, as the final completion of the whole ; 
 and where statem^ents, which at first sight appear in 
 the light of contradictions, are discovered, upon a 
 second examination, to be real congruities; in such 
 a case, be the subject matter as marvellous as it may, 
 we have as strong internal evidence of the authen- 
 ticity and accuracy of those writings, as the nature 
 of things can possibly supply. It is not saying too 
 much to assert, that all these combinations of evidence 
 unite in vouching for the truth of the portions of 
 Scripture now alluded to. Admitting, as we neces- 
 sarily must do, that the history of the Jews, as con- 
 tained in the sacred writings, describes a certain part 
 of the human race as placed under very remarkable, 
 and in a certain sense of the term improbable, cir- 
 cumstances; still, that point once conceded by us, all 
 that follows in the filling up, as it may be called, of 
 the main design, is effected with a smgular air of 
 truth and reality, which it would be absolutely impos- 
 sible to account for on the supposition of the main 
 narrative being fictitious. It is evident, as has already 
 been observed, that it is no solution of the diflftculty 
 to suppose that the ground work of fact is correct, 
 but that the miraculous incidents are a superaddition 
 produced by fraud, superstition, or national vanity ; 
 because by far the greater portion of the prodigies 
 10 
 
110 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 related are such as must be entirely true or entirely 
 false. We cannot account for them by supposing 
 them to have been natural incidents, elevated into 
 preternatural subjects of wonder by the exaggerations 
 of ignorance. The whole recorded series of events 
 requires, for the sake of their own consistency, that 
 the miracles should have been really such. Other- 
 wise the history itself becomes a tissue of inconsequen- 
 tial improbabilities. Unless, then, it can be shown 
 to be too incredible for the satisfaction of a rational 
 mind, to suppose that, all the strange circumstances 
 and anomalies of our nature considered, Providence 
 should ever condescend to afford a revelation of its 
 will to serve us as a guide through this life, and to 
 direct our hopes towards one in reserve ; — unless it 
 can be shown that, even admitting the probability of 
 the communication of some revelation, that revelation 
 is not Christianity ; — and again, unless, supposing 
 Christianity to be true, we still think it impossible 
 that an intermediate and provisional arrangement 
 should be vouchsafed to some one select portion of 
 mankind, for the express purpose of keeping alive the 
 remnant of true Theism from the abominations of 
 idolatry ;— unless, we repeat, all these assumptions 
 are manifestly such as no well-informed mind could 
 possibly admit, under any degree whatever of positive 
 evidence ; it seems to follow that, in a choice of con- 
 flicting difficulties, those attending a belief in the 
 Divine inspiration and consequent truth of the his- 
 torical parts of the Old Testament are far less than 
 those which necessarily accompany their rejection. 
 
 Once, however, proceed thus far, and the course 
 of the believer lies smooth during the remainder of 
 his progress. The intervention of the Deity once 
 admitted as probable, the inference is obvious, that 
 the same superintending care -vvould continue to in- 
 terpose till the final accomplishment of its object 
 should be achieved : and thus the miracles of the New 
 Testament would, by a direct implication, afford 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. Ill 
 
 confirmatory testimony to those of the Old, and the 
 miracles of the Old Testament to those of the New. 
 On the other side, the cause of infidelity is encum- 
 bered with accumulating difficulties at every step. 
 Get rid of the preternatural occurrences recorded by 
 Moses, as the mistakes of a barbarous and supersti- 
 tious age, still we are met by those connected with 
 the later portions of the Jewish history. Deny those, 
 and, in addition to the improbability that an ancient 
 and remarkable people should ever have existed, the 
 whole of whose presumed historical records should 
 essentially prove to have been a fiction ; we have 
 again all the miraculous occurrences connected with 
 the first establishment and subsequent propagation 
 of Christianity, to account for by the same theory 
 of ignorance or forgery. And, after all, if we ask 
 ourselves, what is the great point to be gained, by 
 thus questioning the records of past a^es, step by 
 step, and by attempting, at this late period, to prove 
 to be false, what the assertions of professed eye-wit- 
 nesses declare to have been true; the end and object 
 of this obstinacy of scepticism is nothing less than 
 the dissolution of all the highest sanctions of morality, 
 and the extinction of the hopes of a future life. Surely 
 so unworthy a conclusion, in want of other evidence, 
 would itself argue an unsoundness in the premises 
 upon which it is founded. 
 
 The argument, then, in favour of the authenticity 
 of the Jewish sacred history, derived from the inter* 
 nal air of probability which pervades the whole, is 
 one to which it is impossible to do justice, otherwise 
 than by referring each respective reader to the original 
 work, and recommending him to judge for himself 
 by the standard of his own intuitive common sense. 
 It may not, however, be amiss to point out some few 
 instances, selected at random, in illustration of this 
 view of the subject. 
 
 The theoretical perfection of the Jewish moral 
 code, and the singular contrast which it presents with 
 
112 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 the rebellious and wayward disposition of the people 
 for whose use it was promulgated, has already been 
 alluded to. It has also been observed, on the same 
 occasion, that this opposition between the illumina- 
 tion of the legislator and the darkness of the governed 
 is precisely that which we might expect to find in the 
 case of the communication of a Divine law to a bar- 
 barous people. But upon the supposition that the 
 writings attributed to Moses are the exaggerated 
 statements of that remarkable person himself, or the 
 forgeries of a subsequent period, the fact now referred 
 to would be completely inexplicable. Upon the former 
 hypothesis, we must suppose that Moses, in order to 
 give an imposing air to the law, of which he was the 
 promulgator, was the inventor of that tissue of as- 
 serted miracles, which his writings declare to have 
 accompanied the Israelites in their progress from 
 Egyptian captivity to the promised land of Canaan. 
 But it is obviously inconceivable that the same person 
 who, by a wilful false statement, would attempt to 
 give to a law of his own invention the sanction of 
 Divine authority, by an audacious assertion of mira- 
 cles which had never really taken place, should at the 
 same time act so inconsequentially as to represent 
 that same law in that same narrative as failing of 
 its proposed salutary effect, through the folly and 
 obstinacy of those for whose improvement it was 
 intended. No impostor wilfully invents a falsehood 
 for the sake of proving the failure of his own favour- 
 ite theories ; yet if the miracles recorded in the books 
 of Moses were false, and still those writings were 
 really his, with this gratuitous folly he was undoubt- 
 edly chargeable. If, on the other hand, we suppose 
 what are called the Mosaic books to be the production 
 of a later period, the difficulty now stated is rather 
 increased than diminished. In the first place, it must 
 be pronounced to be next to an impossibility to palm 
 upon a whole nation, however barbarous, a Avritten 
 code of precise and often vexatious enactments, com.'^ 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 113 
 
 bined with the most exquisite moral beauty, as a real 
 work of antiquity, which, supposing the story related 
 of it to be true, would necessarily have been in prac- 
 tical operation before such a forgery could be pro^ 
 duced ; and, secondly, this theory would still suppose 
 in the forger precisely the same act of folly which it 
 seems impossible to attribute, with the slightest pro- 
 bability, to any acknowledged human motives. If 
 those books were the coinage of a later age, and 
 intended to give celebrity to the name of Moses, on 
 the same principle which has led many superstitious 
 people to invent false legends for the sake of confier- 
 ring honour upon departed saints and legislators; 
 why did not the inventor make his panegyric more 
 valuable, by stating the success of the laws in ques- 
 tion, in ameliorating the morals of the Israelites, tq 
 have been in all respects complete ? How could the 
 same mind conceive the idea of the tremendous 
 thunders and lightnings and earthquakes of Mount 
 Sinai, and of the petulant murmurings and rebellions 
 of the Jews against a law thus awfully enforced? If 
 it be urged that such anomalous conduct accords ex- 
 actly with what we know of the strange contradictions 
 of human nature, we readily agree in the truth of that 
 observation ; but we reply, that, though perfectly in 
 keeping with reference to the practical follies of the 
 human breast, such a delineation is by no means 
 consistent with what an interested person would be 
 disposed to invent, whilst attempting to impose a false 
 and plausible statement upon others. A fabulous 
 writer represents his Orpheus, or whoever may be 
 the fictitious hero of his narrative, reducing men and 
 brutes from the savage to a civilized state by the 
 mere charm of his eloquence : he, on the contrary, 
 whose lot it is to relate the real history of the practical 
 effects of the most truly Divine philosophy upon the 
 stubborn materials of our fallen nature, will have a 
 far less pleasing, and as it may at first sight appear, 
 a far less plausible story to record, 
 10=* 
 
114 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 It may be safely asserted that none of us know, or 
 possibly could anticipate from conjecture, the entire 
 degree of desperate resistance preseuted by the evil 
 principle to the good, in the history of the human 
 heart. We cannot conceive that the miracles, re- 
 corded to have taken place in the wilderness, were 
 compatible with the systematic spirit of disobedience 
 related of the followers of Moses. True ; we cannot 
 conceive it, a priori, and, therefore, it is to the highest 
 degree improbable that such a narrative should be 
 forged for the purpose of imposing upon mankind. 
 But neither can we conceive that the most awful 
 visitations of Providence should oftener have a tend- 
 ency to harden than to soften the feelings of irreligious 
 and profligate persons. We should never dare to an- 
 ticipate as a theory, what, unfortunately, we know to 
 be experimentally true, that the hardihood of human 
 wickedness is seldom more dreadfully displayed than 
 in the sinking of a crowded ship, at the execution of 
 a criminal, or during the ravages of pestilence in a 
 thickly peopled city.* There is a desperation of 
 
 * The tendency of temporal affliction in a mind thoroughly imbued 
 with the principles of Christianity is undoubtedly to invigorate the feel. 
 \ng of devotion, and to make the sufferer clin" with more eager reliance 
 to the protection of Heaven. But examples of this description constitute 
 the exception, not the rule, when applied to human nature in general. 
 The following is the description afforded by an eye-witness of the effect 
 produced upon the minds of the population of London by the plague, in 
 the year 1665. It unhappily accords too exactly with what we read of 
 other large communities which have been visited with the like scourge : — 
 
 "The people themselves did not see the hand of God, nor seek righte- 
 ousness, when God's hand was so dreadfully lifted up against us. In one 
 house you might hear them roaring under the pangs of death ; in the next 
 
 tippling, and belching out blasphemies against God; one house 
 
 shut up with a led cross and Lo7-d have mercy upon us ! the next 
 open to all uncleanness and impiety, being senseless of the anger of Grod. 
 In the very pest-houses such wickednesses committed as are not to be 
 
 named The hottest judgments did not teach many of us either 
 
 to pray or repent." — Life of General Monck, by T. Gamble, D.D. 
 
 Bourienne, in his memoirs of Napoleon, gives a no less striking delinea-, 
 tion of that atrocity of feeling which almost invariably accompanies the 
 extremity of human misery, wliere the counteraction of religion is want- 
 ing. The narrative refers to the disastrous retreat of the French arm7 
 from Syria after their discomfiture before the walls of Acre. 
 
 " A most intolerable thirst, the total want of water, and excessive heat.- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 115 
 
 principle in the thoroughly vicious, which hardens 
 Itself in exact proportion to the appeal which would 
 soothe its obduracy into gentleness ; and though the 
 average moral character of mankind may not deserve 
 the full severity of this description, still we know 
 that the waywardness of human nature at the mo- 
 ment of trial is far beyond what we conceive of our 
 feelings in their common and quiescent state. The 
 incredulity of the later Jews, who had been eye- 
 witnesses of our Saviour's miracles, has often been 
 mentioned with surprise, and by the impugn ers of 
 revelation has been referred to as an obvious impro- 
 bability. Yet this very character was given of them 
 by our Redeemer himself. " If they hear not Moses 
 
 and a fatiguing march over burning sandhills, quite disheartened the men, 
 and made every generous sentiment give way to feelings of the grossest 
 selfishness, and most shocking indifference. I saw officers with their 
 limbs amputated, thrown off the litters, whose removal in that way had 
 been ordered, and who had themselves given money to recompense the 
 bearers. I saw the amputated, the wounded, the infected, or those only 
 suspected of infection, deserted and left to themselves. The march was 
 illumined by torches, lighted for the purpose of setting fire to the httle 
 towns, villages, and hamlets which lay in their route, and the rich crops 
 with which the land was then covered. The whole country was in a 
 blaze. Those who were ordered to preside at this work of destruction 
 seemed eager to spread desolation on every side, as if they could, 
 thereby avenge themselves for their reverses, and find in such dread- 
 ful havoc an alleviation of their sufferings. We were constantly 
 surrounded by plunderers, incendiaries, and the dying, who, stretched on 
 the sides of the road, implored assistance in a feeble voice, saying, ' I am 
 not infected, I am only wounded ;' and to convince those whom they ad- 
 dressed, they re-opened their old wounds, or inflicted on themselves fresh 
 ones. Still nobody attended to them. 'It is all over with him,' was the 
 observation applied to the unfortunate beings in succession, while every' 
 one pressed onward. The sun which shone in an unclouded sky in all. 
 its brightness was often darkened by our conflagrations. On our 
 right lay the sea, on our left and behind us the desert made by our- ' 
 selves, before were the privations and sufferings which awaited 
 us.^^— Memoirs of Napoleon, by Bourienne. English translation. 
 Chapter XX. 
 
 Surely if such is human nature in its unregenerate state, the religion 
 which teaches how these fearful and malignant passions may be subdued 
 into love of God and universal charity towards man ought to be a subject 
 of any feeling rather than that of contempt and aversion. It was a 
 striking observation of a French poet, in illustration of tiie extreme 
 wickedness of the human heart, " that at the very commencement of the 
 world, when as yet society consisted of only four or five persons, one 
 member of that small community was the murderer of his brotlier." 
 
11^ CONSISTENCY OP REVELATION 
 
 and the Prophets^ neither will *they be persuaded 
 though one rose from the dead." This very experi- 
 ment was, we are assured, on two remarkable occa- 
 sions, made upon that stubborn people, and in both 
 cases the result was precisely what had been antici- 
 pated* Lazarus, the friend of our Redeemer, was pub- 
 licly raised from the dead; and the effect produced was, 
 that the Jewish rulers became alarmed, in consequence 
 of the increased number of converts to the new faith, 
 for the stability of their ancient institutions. The 
 resolution, accordingly, to which they came, was 
 entirely in unison with the spirit of this world. " The 
 chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus 
 also to death, because that by reason of him many of 
 the Jews went away and believed in Jesus." That 
 same Jesus was himself miraculously raised up from 
 the grave, and the truth of his doctrines confirmed 
 by a communication of preternatural gifts to his fol- 
 fowers ; and again the conduct of the same rulers was 
 consistent with itself. They admitted, because it was 
 impossible to deny, that " indeed a notable miracle 
 had been done," but so far from becoming converts 
 to a religion which they feared would supersede their 
 own, on the contrary, "when they had called the 
 Apostles and beaten them, they commanded that they 
 should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them 
 go." It cannot be denied that there is a strong resem- 
 blance between the obstinacy, for it can scarcely be 
 called disbelief, of the later Jews, notwithstanding 
 the notoriety of our Saviour's miracles, and that of 
 their forefathers, who so repeatedly witnessed those 
 of Moses ; and we know also from experience, that 
 it is a resemblance resulting from the principles of 
 our common nature, which is ever consistent even in. 
 its most anomalous inconsistencies. And it is by this 
 strong resemblance that we are satisfied of the truth 
 and justice of the drawing in both instances. But if 
 from these general and broad principles we proceed, 
 in the case of the early Jews, to a more minute 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 117 
 
 and detailed examination of what is related of them 
 by their historian, the accuracy of the delineation 
 becomes more striking from the extreme air of pro- 
 bability with which he relates the oscillations of 
 feeling in that wayward people, according as they 
 chanced to be operated upon at the moment, by super- 
 natural or familiar objects. The rebellious spirit of 
 the Israelites was evidently not that which would be 
 the result of scepticism, with regard to the real nature 
 of the miracles which they had witnessed. On the 
 contrary, it was that alternation of opposite and con- 
 tradictory modes of excitement which is so often to 
 be found in an ill-regulated mind, which wants steadi- 
 ness of principle rather than reality of conviction, 
 and which relapses into sin from weakness and 
 coarseness of character, not from any disbelief in the 
 Divine sanctions of religion. Nothing, in fact, can 
 be more graphically or strikingly drawn than the 
 whole description of the migration of the Israelites as 
 given by their inspired historian. The little appre- 
 hension which they appear at first to have entertained 
 of the nature of the mission of their leader; the 
 reckless hurry with which they rushed from the terri- 
 tory of their oppressors to the confines of the Red 
 Sea ; the deep depression which they displayed upon 
 finding their retreat apparently cut off; the extrava- 
 gance of their joy upon their miraculous deliverance, 
 followed almost immediately by an impatience of 
 the privations of the desert, and a longing after the 
 degrading comforts of their recent state of slavery; 
 their awe-stricken apprehensions during the thunder- 
 ings from Mount Sinai, followed, after an extremely 
 short interval, by an act of the grossest idolatry; 
 their discontents, their jealousies, and heart-burnings 
 against Moses and their other rulers ; their exagge- 
 rated alarm respecting the physical powers and 
 prowess of the Canaanites, and their conspiracy to 
 abandon their leaders, and to return into Egyptian 
 captivity ; all these are traits of character in which 
 
118 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 we recognise the fickleness of human nature at every 
 step, such as the governors of every large assemblage 
 of people have bitterly experienced ; and such as the 
 reports of travellers, whose wanderings have more 
 especially thrown them in the way of uncivilized 
 nations, describe to us at the present moment. 
 
 But it is one thing to recognise the characteristic 
 workings of our nature, when we find them faithfully 
 portrayed for us in any well-written record, and 
 another to anticipate, by the intuitive strength of our 
 own imagination, what those workings, under any 
 given modification of circumstances, would be. There 
 is a boldness and an individuality in the sketches of 
 real life which it is scarcely possible to invent, and of 
 which, accordingly, a happy and tolerably successful 
 imitation has ever been considered among the fore- 
 most proofs of literary talent. Now the question is, 
 whether, putting the preternatural incidents of the 
 Jewish history out of the question, the detailed nar- 
 rative does, or does not, contain strong internal evi- 
 dence of its own authenticity. This is a query as to 
 a point of fact, of which every reasonable person is a 
 competent judge, and which we cannot but think 
 would invariably be answered in the affirmative. 
 Perhaps we should correctly describe it in stating 
 it to be a surprisingly probable portraiture of human 
 nature, placed in an improbable position as to external 
 circumstances. The rebellions and cowardice attri- 
 buted to the Israelites, whilst under the guidance of 
 Moses, never, we repeat, appears to have been the 
 consequence of any disbelief of the miracles already 
 performed for their deliverence. On the contrary, 
 their conduct seems to have been precisely what 
 might have been expected from untrained minds ; held, 
 indeed, together by the terror and conviction result- 
 ing from occasional displays of superhuman power in 
 their conductors, but still sinking under the depression 
 and wear of animal spirits from the privations under 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 119 
 
 which they were suffering, and the difficulty of cal- 
 culating upon miraculous assistance in future emer- 
 gencies, where all the physical powers of nature 
 seemed arrayed against them. It is easy for those 
 who have not been thus tried to say, that the expe- 
 rience of past miracles ou^ht to have given them a full 
 unshrinking confidence in the certainty of similar 
 support for the future. So in strict reason it ought. 
 But the question is, not what is reasonable, or what 
 appears to us, after the whole train of circumstances 
 has become matter of history, the most natural line 
 of conduct, but what would be the operation of 
 human passions, under the natural impatience pro- 
 duced by immediate hardship in a new and perfectly 
 unexampled position, when the scorching desert lay 
 before and behind them, and the confidence inspired 
 by the recollection of former deliverances was met 
 and counteracted by the scene of unvaried desolation 
 which met their eyes. *' Can God," they said, " furn- 
 ish a table in the wilderness ? Behold, he smote 
 the rock that the waters gushed out, and the streams 
 overflowed : can he give bread also ? can he provide 
 flesh for his people ?" What human being can look 
 into his own heart, and not feel that the despondency 
 which we charge as so heavy a sin upon the rude and 
 thoughtless Israelites would not, under similar cir- 
 cumstances, have been his own ? Scripture itself, we 
 should recollect, whilst it records the weaknesses and 
 caprices of this singular people, charges their failings 
 to no permanent doubt of the reality of the Divine 
 mission of Moses and of Joshua ; but to those fluctua- 
 tions of feeling under the operation of momentary 
 trials, which not less really and substantially, though 
 less palpably, afforded the explanation of all the 
 inconsistencies of human conduct among individuals 
 a thousand times better trained, and more advanced 
 in moral discipline, than the persons here described. 
 " And Israel served the Lord all the days of Joshua, 
 
1S5 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 and all the days of the elders that overlived Joshua, 
 and which had known all the works of the Lord that 
 He had done for Israel."*- 
 
 CHAPTER Xni. 
 
 Of the internal Evidence of the Authenticity of the Historical Books 
 of the Old Testament subsequent to Moses. 
 
 ^HE final extinction of that generation which had 
 witnessed the miracles attendant upon the first intro- 
 duction of the Israelites into Canaan was followed, 
 as the general habits and disposition of that people 
 would lead us to anticipate, by an increased apostasy 
 from the religion of Jehovah, and an adoption of the 
 idolatries of the neighbouring nations. From this 
 period to the point where the narrative of the books 
 of the Old Testament terminates, the recorded course 
 of events is precisely what might have been expected 
 from human nature placed in the very peculiar cir- 
 cumstances there described, but in those circum- 
 stances only. The rule of probability, as applicable 
 to this remarkable portion of history, must have refer- 
 ence to a condition of society which, at this moment, 
 it is scarcely possible for us adequately to conceive. 
 A small and by no means highly civilized nation, 
 miraculously supported in its political existence by 
 the occasional intervention of the Almighty himself, 
 to the almost total exclusion of the common and 
 regular modes of defence against hostile incursion, 
 and subjected to institutions not the natural growth 
 of the popular habits and character, but forcibly 
 imposed upon them by a fatality stronger than them- 
 selves, presents a picture so perfectly unlike any thing 
 which we are prepared to meet with in the history of 
 mankind, that we look with a natural curiosity for 
 
 ' Joshua XXIV, 31. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 121 
 
 the recorded details of transactions so -extraordinary. 
 The result is still, as on the former occasion, humiliat- 
 ing to the human character from the scene of moral 
 degradation, mingled, indeed, with occasional beauti- 
 ful and sublime touches, which it presents ; and though 
 still remarkable for the air of reality with which the 
 successive incidents are related, is obviously such as 
 few impostors could, and none actuated by any known 
 motive of national variety or self-interest would, wish 
 to invent. The signal successes which, from time 
 to time, attended their military expeditions, were so 
 completely independent of the usual natural means 
 for their successful accomplishment, that nothing 
 short of occasional recurrences of the most implicit 
 faith in the Divine promises, and in the continuance 
 of that support which had never deserted their fore- 
 fathers in the hour of need, could have enabled them 
 to calculate upon similar interpositions, in those 
 impending perils which so repeatedly threatened them 
 v/ith extinction. And, accordingly, we find in the 
 history of that period a succession of alternations 
 between moments of extreme depression and of san- 
 guine confidence, whilst, at the same time, the moral 
 and religious character of the people was, from the 
 same causes, fluctuating between an inveterate hos- 
 tility to the idolatrous practices of their Canaanitish 
 neighbours, and an occasional adoption of their worst 
 abominations. Such, in fact, was, more or less, the 
 national character down to the tinxC of the Chaldean 
 captivity. That under any view of the case, it was 
 one by no means calculated to add to the credit of the 
 people thus portrayed, is perfectly clear. Our present 
 business, however, is not with the question, how far 
 the Israelites appear to have acted worthily of the 
 high position in which God's selection of them as the 
 depositaries of his will had placed them, but how far the 
 narrative which records these transactions comes to us 
 with the stamp and impress of authenticity. Now, 
 as the existence of that history as a work, at all events 
 11 
 
122 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 of very high antiquity, must he admitted by all parties, 
 the only query is, "it'Ao were the historians?" were 
 they friends, or were they enemies, who have recorded 
 the circumstances in question ? Either supposition, 
 if by adopting it we mean to imply a bias in the mind 
 of the writer to exaggerate or to detract from the 
 merits of the people described, is equally inadmissible. 
 The Jewish history is, clearly, not the work of ene- 
 mies to their name, for they are ever spoken of as the 
 only observers of the true religion, and as the chosen 
 nation of the one true God. It can scarcely, on the other 
 hand, be said to be the production of friends, for its far 
 greater proportion is little more than a narrative of 
 the waywardness, ingratitude, and profligacy of that 
 self-same people. Again, it was not the composi- 
 tion of any political parly, advocating one set of state 
 maxims, to the exclusion of others, for it is equally 
 lavish of its censures upon democracy and monarchy, 
 whilst it records the transactions of both. It is not 
 the calculating panegyrist upon this or that individual, 
 for, with the exception of the few truly righteous 
 persons who were thinly scattered over that long 
 period, in relating the achievements of the most 
 eminent and laudable of their monarchs, it dwells 
 with, at least, an equal detail and minuteness upon 
 their failings and crimes, as upon their virtues. It 
 condemns the reprobate Saul, and yet it mourns over 
 his fallen fortunes with striking pathos : it eulogizes 
 the sanguine, open-hearted, and devout David, and 
 yet it denounces in the strongest language of censure, 
 his ingratitude, blood-guiltiness, and adultery. It 
 recites, with beautiful accuracy, the most eloquent 
 devotional composition on record, Solomon's dedica- 
 tion of the temple ; and expatiates, with delight, upon 
 his many accomplishments, and that various wisdom, 
 the fame of which attracted to his court the queen of 
 the south ; and yet it concludes by narrating his total 
 and inexcusable idolatry. It brands with the taint of 
 rebellion and heresy, the long succession of Israelitish. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 123 
 
 lings, and yet, on the other hand, where censure 
 appears to be called for by the conduct of the more 
 orthodox lineage of David, it applies that censure 
 without stint, and without any attempt at palliation. 
 It, surely, may be confidently asserted of any his- 
 tory, to which it seems quite impossible to attach the 
 charge of partiality, or of self-interest, in any shape, 
 that its real end and object must have been truth. 
 And such is, undoubtedly, the main impression which 
 the history of the Jewish people, as given in the Old 
 Testament, conveys to our minds. From first to last 
 there is nothing in the whole getting up of the nar- 
 rative which marks selection, or the grouping and 
 contrasting characters for the sake of effect, for sug- 
 gesting a political inference, or eliciting some favourite 
 prudential maxim. Its resemblance to real nature is 
 that of the faithful reflection of the mirror, and not 
 of the calculated arrangement of the imaginative 
 painter. Nor is this all. The portraiture given to 
 us is not only that of a far from perfect people, but 
 also the failings which we find successively attributed 
 to them are precisely such as assort with the respec- 
 tive periods described. Every event, every trait of 
 character, is in the strictest keeping with the existing 
 course of events. The sins of the earlier epochs in 
 the career of nations, like those in the history of indi- 
 viduals, are generally such as result from unsteady 
 principles and desultory passions acting in defiance 
 of better knowledge ; whilst the latter stage, in both 
 cases, is disfigured by an increasing spirit of worldli- 
 ness, and. the callousness of mind which so frequently 
 comes on when the season of novelty and excitement 
 is gone by. This gradual process of decay, which 
 constitutes the summary of the history of almost all 
 the extinct nations of antiquity, is, in a striking man- 
 ner, that of the fortunes of the Jewish people. From 
 the time of the revolt of the ten tribes, to that of the 
 captivity, the worst and most fatal symptom of ap- 
 proaching dissolution which can show itself in the 
 
.1^ CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 body politic, namely, an increasing indifference to the 
 institutions which warmed the heart-blood of their 
 forefathers, became, from year to year, more mani- 
 fest. Though professedly subsisting upon a principle 
 of miraculous interference, their invocations of the 
 Divine protection seem gradually to have become less 
 and less earnest, and their reliance upon human 
 means of support, in spite of the strong remonstrances 
 of the law and of the later prophets upon those points, 
 more uniform."^ When we say that such conduct 
 was, at least, natural, and that, in proportion as such 
 prodigies as those which accompanied their first 
 growth became less frequent, their zeal might be 
 expected to decline from its original fervency, we are, 
 in fact, only adding the sanction of our judgment, as 
 to the internal probability of the narrative which 
 asserts it of them. The second book of Kings and 
 the. second book of Chronicles bear every mark of 
 their own authenticity, from the striking delineation 
 which they afford of a nation, Avhose patriotism and 
 religion were on the Avane, from the mere ordinary 
 tendency to degeneracy which is the fate of all human 
 institutions. In the history of the later kings of 
 Judah we read of occasional attempts made by the 
 sovereigns of the day to revive the dormant spirit of 
 the religion of Moses, by removing the pollutions of 
 
 * The book of Malachl, the valedictory remonstrance of the departing 
 spirit of Jewish prophecy, consists of little more than an eloquent ana 
 indignant delineation of the extreme selfishneas and worldliness of feeling 
 which at that late period, had succeeded in quenching all the higher prin- 
 ciples of devotion in the Israelitish nation. " A son honoureth his father, 
 and a servant his master. If, then, I be a father, where is mine honour? 
 and if I be a master, where is my fear ] saith the Lord of Hosts unto you, 
 O priests, that despise my name. And ye say, Wherein have we despised 
 thy name 1 Ye offer polluted bread upo)i mine altar, and ye say, Wherein 
 have we polluted thee 7 In that ye say, The table of the Lord is contempti- 
 ble. And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, is it not evill And if ye offer 
 the lame and the sick, is it not evil ? Offer it now unto thy governor : will 
 he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person 1 saith the Lord of Hosts. 
 .... Who is there, even among you, that would shut the doors for 
 naught? Neither do ye kindle fire on mine altar for naught. I have no 
 pleasure in you, saith the Lord of Hosts, neither willl accept an offering 
 at your hand." Malachi i. 6. &c. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 125 
 
 the temple, and reestablishing the sacrifices accord- 
 ing to the form prescribed by that legislator. But 
 these very attempts obviously mark the almost com- 
 plete disuse into which that religion had fallen . They 
 were not the mere correction of such abuses as, in 
 the course of time, might be supposed to have crept 
 in through the occasional ignorance or superstition 
 of the worshippers, but they were, in fact, the recon- 
 struction of ancient usages, which had, for a long 
 course of time, been completely lost sight of. It is 
 evident that the prevailing principles of the day were 
 those of total irreligion ; and though the influence of 
 a few well-disposed monarchs might succeed, for a 
 moment, in giving an external and transitory anima- 
 tion to the extinct spirit of true devotion, there was 
 no corresponding feeling on the part of the people. 
 We read of Hezekiah, that he celebrated a passover 
 far exceeding, in the solemnity of the ceremonies, and 
 in the assemblage of the Avorshippers, any which had 
 been known since the days of Solomon : but we do 
 not find the slightest proofs that the devotional excite- 
 ment, thus created, was attended with any permanent 
 or substantial effect. On the contrary, we read of 
 his son Manasseh, that he polluted himself with the 
 grossest idolatry ; and what is still more remarkable, 
 only two reigns later, from the surprise and conster- 
 nation which a discovery of a copy of the original law 
 created in king Josiah, and Hilkiah the high-priest, 
 by reference to which they learned how widely they 
 had deviated from the religion of their ancestors, we 
 find that that complex system of sacred legislation 
 had, for the space of one generation at least, been 
 preserved only in the form of general oral tradition. 
 In this last-mentioned circumstance we cannot but 
 remark the striking analogy which existed between 
 the neglect of the written law of Moses, which 
 prevailed in the latter period of the Jewish history 
 previous to the captivity, and the disregard of the Holy- 
 Scriptures in general, which so strongly characterized 
 IL* 
 
126 CONSISTENCY OF KEVELATION 
 
 that languid and worn-out state of the Church of 
 Rome, which immediately preceded the establish- 
 ment of Protestantism. It was not, as we are in- 
 formed, until the second year after his entry into the 
 monastery of Erfurt, that Luther accidentally met 
 with a Latin Bible, and commenced that study of 
 original revelation which shortly afterwards produced 
 such important effects upon mankind: so like is 
 human nature in all ages to itself. In such a state 
 of moral lethargy as that w^hich prevailed among 
 the Jews at the period now described, it was, clearly, 
 not within the power of the sovereign, however Avell 
 disposed, to stimulate his subjects into a substantial 
 reformation. He seems, indeed, to have done all that 
 which the best principles could suggest ; " He sent 
 and gathered together all the elders of Judah and 
 Jerusalem. And the king went up into the house of 
 the Lord, and all the men of Judah, and the inhabit- 
 ants of Jerusalem, and the priests, and the Levites, 
 and all the people, great and small. And he read in 
 their ears all the words of the book of the covenant 
 that was found in the house of the Lord. And the 
 king stood in his place, and made a covenant before 
 the Lord, to walk after the Lord, and to keep his 
 commandments, and his testimonies, and his statutes, 
 with all his heart, and with all his soul ; to perform 
 the words of the covenant which are written in this 
 book ; and he caused all that were present in Jerusa- 
 lem and Benjamin to stand to it. And the inhabitants 
 of Jerusalem did according to the covenant of God, 
 the God of their fathers. And Josiah took away all 
 the abominations out of all the countries that per- 
 tained to the children of Israel, and made all that 
 were present in Israel to serve, even to serve the Lord 
 their God. And there was no passover like to that 
 kept in Israel from the days of Samuel the prophet ; 
 neither did all the kings of Israel keep such a passover 
 as Josiah kept, and the priests, and the Levites, and 
 all Judah and Israel that were present, and the inhabit- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 127 
 
 ants of Jerusalem." But the effort thus made was 
 only like the last convulsive struggle which precedes 
 dissolution in an exhausted frame. The next gene- 
 ration saw the extinction of the kingdom of Judah, 
 and the commencement of that series of tremendous 
 inflictions, which from that day to the present, with 
 the exception of a few more prosperous intervals, 
 have marked the fortunes of that singular and devoted 
 people. 
 
 CHAPTER XIV. 
 
 The same, subject continued. 
 
 Thus, then, there is from first to last a consistency 
 in the chain of events recorded in the Jewish Scrip- 
 tures, which would seem to be perfectly inexplicable 
 upon any other principle than that of their entire 
 genuineness and authenticity. The later writings, 
 whether we look to them for information on ques- 
 tions of natural polity, religious belief, or the ever 
 varying shades of manners and habitual impressions, 
 all pre-suppose the existence of the earlier ; and the 
 earlier, as obviously stamped with a prospective 
 character, were incomplete without the addition of 
 the latter. But as no hypothesis with which we are 
 acquainted will allow us to assign the date of their 
 respective compositions to one and the same period, 
 of course the theory that they were forged for a 
 specific purpose of imposition falls at once to the 
 ground. That from the miraculous incidents which 
 they relate they are unlike all other authentic his- 
 torical documents, is readily granted ; but it by no 
 means follows that the peculiarity of character which 
 attaches to them argues any real improbability in the 
 facts themselves. The abstract question of probable 
 or improbable, on those points, must rest entirely 
 
128 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 upon the degree of our assent to the primary propo- 
 sitions with which we commenced this discussion. 
 If we deem an express revelation of the Divine Will, 
 in some form or other, as not inconsistent with the 
 arrangements of Providence ; if we admit, also, that 
 of all presumed revelations, Christianity is the one 
 preeminently borne out by a vast weight of external 
 and internal evidence ; and if we grant, also, that from 
 the late period at which the acknowledged circum- 
 stances of human nature required that the Christian 
 dispensation should be communicated to mankind, a 
 previous provisional and less perfect system of dis- 
 cipline might reasonably be looked for, — surely, with 
 these warrantable admissions, the preternatural cha- 
 racter of the fortunes connected Avith the Israelitish 
 family present no very formidable objection to the 
 really candid mind. It may sound paradoxical to 
 assert that the probability of the truth of that remark- 
 able portion of human history would be actually 
 diminished, were it found to be more analogous than 
 it actually is with that of other nations. Considered, 
 however, as an abstract proposition, unconnected 
 with that habitual bias and predisposition forced upon 
 us by our own individual experience, such undoubt- 
 edly would appear to be the legitimate assumption. 
 Certainly, if we are reduced to the alternative of 
 either discarding the momentous and cheering hopes 
 held forth by the Gospel, with its accompanying prac- 
 tical rule of life, or, on the other hand, of admitting 
 the fact that a visible Providence xlid, from the world's 
 beginning, prepare the way for that sublime dispen- 
 sation, and only ceased finally to interfere when such 
 interposition was no longer needed, the latter suppo- 
 sition, independently of the vast preponderance of 
 external testimony by which it is guaranteed, is a 
 thousand times the most intrinsically probable. With 
 this view of the question, 'then, we may surely be 
 content, without seeking to shelter ourselves in that 
 intermediate and most unphilosophical scheme which, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 129 
 
 admitting Christianity to be a gift from heaven, would 
 flinch from the supposition that the preparatory ar- 
 rangements for the communication of that gift could 
 possibly proceed from other than natural causes. If 
 we would preserve our consistency of argument, we 
 must either deny in toto xhe possibility of any mira- 
 culous intervention whatever in the case of the latter 
 no less than of the former covenant ; or, if we find 
 ourselves obliged, by the irresistible force of evidence, 
 to pass that line, we must be content to admit the 
 reality of such special acts of Providence, not in such 
 proportion only as our caprice or prejudices may 
 dictate, but as the only authentic writings extant 
 which have reference to the case appear broadly and 
 manifestly to assert. At the same time it is but 
 reasonable to observe, that the first impression con-^ 
 veyed to our minds by the perusal of the inspired 
 historians is, perhaps, that of a state of things less 
 analogous to the ordinary course of human events 
 than was actually the case with regard to the trans- 
 actions related. The miraculous events related in 
 the Bible, in consequence of the condensation of the 
 narrative, often occupy a much nearer position, with 
 reference to one another, in the associations of our 
 minds, than would accord with the respective periods 
 of their occurrence. A few pages of the sacred his- 
 tory are, we should recollect, sometimes the register 
 of the events of several centuries. Miracles, even at 
 the period of their greatest frequency, must ever have 
 been thinly scattered among the habitual incidents 
 of human life. Most probably, by far the greater 
 portion of the express deviations from the established 
 laws of nature, permitted by Providence since the 
 creation of man, are enumerated in the Bible. 
 These, if spread over the long course of time which 
 the sacred narrative comprehends, will be found to 
 bear a very trifling proportion to the whole. It is 
 obvious, accordingly, that the most favoured of God's 
 saints must ever have had more to do with the cal- 
 
130 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 culation of common contingences, and the making 
 provision for the supply of human want by human 
 means, than our habitual impressions, derived from 
 our study of the sacred writings, would suggest. The 
 Elijah of the Old, and the Paul of the New Testa- 
 ment, may be quoted as cases in point with reference 
 to this remark. Both these memorable personages, 
 if there is any truth in Holy Writ, had their respec- 
 tive Divine communications and their miraculous 
 powers. Yet both had, also, their long visitations of 
 alarm, of difficulty, of penury, and of danger. The 
 occasional helps afforded them seem to have been 
 intended almost for the sole purpose of substantiating 
 their title to the character of God's chosen messen- 
 gers, and only incidentally for the protection of the 
 body, and the furtherance of their personal comfort. 
 This observation has already been adduced, in order 
 to account for what many persons have considered 
 the remarkable phenomena of the very unsteady faith 
 produced in the minds of the persons who were eye- 
 witnesses of the miracles recorded in the sacred 
 writings. Even under the most extreme circum- 
 stances, the natural incidents produced by the esta- 
 blished course of events must numerically have far 
 exceeded the special deviations here alluded to. But 
 as our calculations for the future, by an admitted law 
 of our nature, are entirely regulated by our experience 
 of the past, it is evident that the main impression 
 left upon the minds, even of the most openly favoured 
 of God's servants, must ever have been the anticipa- 
 tion of natural, rather than of preternatural, occur- 
 rences in the yet unrevealed events of futurity. 
 Fictitious narratives of wonder, whether intended for 
 the purposes of amusement or imposture, whether in 
 the shape of the wild dreams of romance, or of the 
 legends of Romish hagiology, are ever prodigal of 
 their attempts to astonish us by the prodigies which 
 they relate. Scripture, on the contrary, never loses ^ 
 sight of the analogy of common nature and of truth; 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 131 
 
 but, with that harmony and simplicity of character 
 which pervades the material universe, ever produces 
 its great transcendental ends by the least possible 
 expenditure of means. 
 
 CHAPTER XV. 
 
 Further observations upon the moral tendency of the Levitical 
 Institutions. 
 
 The presumed argument against the Divine au- 
 thority of the Old Testament, derived from the very 
 low degree of moral merit manifested by the Jews 
 throughout their whole history, has been already 
 alluded to in some detail ; but it may not, perhaps, 
 be improper to revert to it, in this place, for the sake 
 of a few more observations which the subject will 
 admit. The great force of this objection is, as it 
 would seem, broken down at once, if we grant that, 
 presuming that God prefers accomplishing his ends 
 through the intervention of secondary, and, so far as 
 is possible, what are usually deemed natural causes, 
 the selection of at least one nation, as the deposita- 
 ries of his will, prior to the final communication of 
 the Christian system, was rendered absolutely neces- 
 sary by that tendency to idolatry which forms so 
 striking a characteristic of human nature in its 
 undisciplined state. Why man was* so created, as 
 to be liable to such aberrations, it is not for us to 
 discuss. The certainty of the fact is quite sufficient 
 for the present argument. Had the Mosaic law never 
 existed, in other words, had the Jewish nation never 
 been thus especially favoured, what, as has been 
 already asked, can we imagine would have been the 
 reception afforded to the preaching of Christ and of 
 his apostles, in the four thousandth year of the world ? 
 It is not too much to say, that the whole moral feel- 
 
132 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 ing of mankind would have undergone a complete 
 wreck long before that time. The degrading effects 
 of barbarism, and the scarcely less pernicious conse- 
 quences of false philosophy and selfish casuistry, 
 would have succeeded in entirely obliterating all that 
 pure sensitiveness of principle on which all the inter- 
 nal evidences and all the practical value of religion 
 depend. This foremost, and otherwise inevitable, 
 evil, was undoubtedly obviated, in a great measure, 
 by the promulgation of the written Mosaic law, and 
 by the special sanctions given through it to the great 
 primary truths of religion and morals, and by the 
 executive enforcement of those sanctions, under a 
 theocratical government, for so many centuries. That 
 the nation, thus selected, fulfilled the task assigned 
 to it, by preserving entire the principles of true reli- 
 gion, is an indisputable fact. With the economy of 
 this arrangement, then, it appears impossible for our 
 reason to quarrel, especially as it appears probable 
 that, with all their defects, the Jews were still as fit 
 instruments for the purposes of Providence, and as 
 little objectionable, on the score of moral desert, as 
 any other people of that early period in which the 
 selection was made. Our knowledge of the state of 
 society at that epoch is confined to what we can col- 
 lect from the sacred writings, with, perhaps, a few 
 very uncertain conjectures, derivable from the preca- 
 rious testimony of early Pagan writers. Europe, if 
 inhabited at all, must at that time have been the resi- 
 dence of a mere horde of savages : the facts recorded 
 of the Egyptians are any thing rather than favourable 
 to them, as a humane and polished people, whilst the 
 inhabitants of Canaan are known to have been pol- 
 luted by the worst stains which can disfigure human 
 nature. Was, then, the scheme of Providence to be 
 suspended, because the history of mankind was thus 
 dark and uninviting? Because the whole existing 
 human race was vicious, was it therefore to be 
 allowed to continue so, or to sink still deeper in moral 
 
WITH HUMAN EEASON. 133 
 
 degradation, rather than that the Divine wisdom 
 should avail itself of incidental causes for effecting a 
 cure ? This is the real question, which the urgers of 
 the above-mentioned objection are bound to answer, 
 or to abandon their position. The Deist himself 
 admits, that the system of God's government is to 
 make the machinery of human passions conduce to 
 the accomplishment of his wise purposes; but this 
 admission, if true, is not the less so because we may 
 chance to arrive at it through the declarations of an 
 inspired writer, rather than through the conclusions 
 of the moralist and philosopher. The very peculiar 
 position of the Je\yish people, with respect to the 
 singular covenant under which they were placed, 
 affords, however, another most important instruction 
 to mankind. In Judaism and Christianity we have 
 two parallel but opposed cases, of equally authentic 
 Divine revelation, professedly established upon dis^- 
 similar, though, with reference to their respective 
 objects, equally consistent, views of God's moral 
 government. The law of Moses displays to our con- 
 templation a perfectly just but strictly retributive 
 Governor of the universe : that of Christ, a reconciled 
 judge, not less intrinsically just, but shielding the 
 rigour of his justice in the attributes of unbounded 
 mercy. In order duly to appreciate the full beauty 
 of the latter dispensation, it is quite necessary that 
 we should previously have accustomed our minds to 
 contemplate the rigorous and inflexible enactments 
 of the former. No stronger appeal can possibly be 
 made to the feelings of a -human being, who has 
 recently been rescued from some dreadful impending 
 danger, than that afforded^ by the retrospect of the 
 very perils from which he has providentially escaped. 
 The mind, at such a moment, takes a natural delight 
 in representing to itself all the horrors with which it 
 had been threatened, and contrasting them with the 
 tranquillity and security of its present position. Such • 
 feelings, in a well-constructed nature, are invariably 
 12 
 
134 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 accompanied by a sense of humility, of self-abase* 
 ment, and of gratitude to that power to which it is 
 indebted for protection. Now, if a Christian would 
 know the very exceeding value of the immense gifts 
 which have been conferred upon him by the covenant 
 of the Gospel, he must, for that purpose, study, in fear 
 and trembling, the books of the Old Testament. He 
 will there find the veil of mystery, which at this 
 moment conceals the really existing agency of Pro- 
 vidence upon his creatures, withdrawn, and the 
 whole mechanism of the Divine gonernment of the 
 aJBfairs of this world exposed bare to his view. He 
 will see the necessary connexion, as certain as that 
 of any other regular series of cause and effect, which 
 exist between obedience to God's will and happi- 
 ness, between disobedience and misery. It is true 
 that he can no longer calculate upon that immediate 
 temporal retribution which formed an essential part 
 of that system of theocracy which constituted the 
 national polity of the Jews, but he will see, with no 
 less certainty of conviction, that the delay of execu- 
 tion argues no forgetfulness in the Almighty mind, 
 nor any unsteadiness of purpose. Though sickened, 
 as he reads, by the details of human folly and wick- 
 edriess in their worst shapes, he will find the deep 
 abomination of sin denounced with no less fearful 
 energy of language in the Old Testament than in the 
 New, and the great Author of all things spoken of 
 with an awe-stricken solemnity of feeling, far exceed- 
 ing any thing which ever suggested itself to the 
 most eloquent of Pagan poets or philosophers, in their 
 sublimest moments of fancy. He will learn by what 
 an elaborate process of expiatory sacrifices and pur- 
 gations our fallen nature was ineffectually attempted 
 to be cleansed for a long succession of ages, before 
 the accomplishment of the one great and sufficient 
 sacrifice in the person of Christ. He Avill read with 
 what parental anxiety He, whom the heaven of 
 heavens cannot contain, watches over the smallest 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 135 
 
 occurrences upon earth ; with what searching intui- 
 tiveness he looks into the most minute germs of 
 thought in the human breast; with what strict but 
 kind severity he checks man's deviations from recti- 
 tude; with what eagerness of affection he hails the 
 first symptoms of contrition and of practical amend- 
 ment. But the result of the inquiry will be that of 
 amazed self-abasement and humiliation, from the 
 conviction of the utter inability of unredeemed 
 human nature to stand in the presence of Him, in 
 whose sight the very heavens are unclean, and who 
 charges even his angels with folly. Human phi- 
 losophy, by lowering the standard of religious moral- 
 ity, may have some refuge of hope, in the idea that 
 a moderate, or, as it has been called, a congruous, 
 degree of merit will be all that will be required of us. 
 It may represent the Divine Being as good-natured, 
 if we may presume to use such an expression upon 
 such an occasion, rather than merciful ; and indiffer- 
 ent to the distinctions of human conduct, rather than 
 disposed to measure it by the rule of faultless perfec- 
 tion. But the Old Testament affords none of this 
 false and spurious consolation. It asserts, with all 
 the uncompromising severity of truth, the general 
 baseness and selfishness of the human heart ; and, 
 though it announces, in no less clear language, the 
 infinite benevolence of the Creator, it supplies no 
 solution of the difficulty, how the exercise of that 
 benevolence may be rendered compatible with the 
 workings of retributive justice, excepting by a few 
 occasional interspersed hints of some intended pro- 
 spective arrangement, by which, in the fulness of 
 time, this grand anomaly should be explained and 
 reconciled. And in this awful state of uncertainty 
 that earlier portion of the inspired Scriptures leaves 
 us, with our apprehensions awakened, with a con- 
 viction of the entire inadequacy of ritual expiations, 
 to accomplish their object, and with faint but inde- 
 finite hopes, that the concluding scene in this grand 
 
136 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 and momentous drama may prove more satisfactory 
 than the preceding. 
 
 Now it is impossible to deny, that without such 
 thrilling conviction of the necessity of some scheme 
 of efficacious redemption, as is forced upon our feel- 
 ings by the awful system of preparation developed in 
 the Old Testament, and the fearful exposition of the 
 danger attaching to man's natural position, as a 
 moral and responsible agent, we should all of us 
 entertain very inadequate notions of the immense 
 value of that expiation afforded by the covenant of the 
 Gospel. No worldly blessing is duly appreciated by 
 us until its want has been severely felt, and a present 
 enjoyment is then only perceived in its full intensity, 
 when we contrast it with the lot which, under other 
 circumstances, might have been ours. Infinitely 
 beneficent, therefore, as the Christian dispensation is, 
 our Creator has wisely contrived all the avenues and 
 approaches to it, so as to afford the benefit of striking 
 and impressive contrast. He begins as the God of 
 terrors, he concludes as the God of mercy : he makes 
 his covenant a covenant of grace, not of works, in 
 order that no man may boast : he hath concluded all 
 under sin, that he might have mercy upon all. 
 . The place, then, occupied by the Mosaic ritual, in 
 the scheme of revelation, is precisely that which, if 
 Christianity be true, our retrospective review of the 
 whole system would naturally assign to it. As a 
 schoolmaster to bring us to Christ, it is most admira- 
 bly constructed in all its parts. As a code of reli- 
 gious morality it is, so far as it reaches, in all respects 
 worthy of the holy source from which it proceeded. 
 Still, however, it in some measure confessedly is, as 
 indeed from theory it might be expected to be, imper- 
 fect in the character of its enactments ; for were il 
 otherwise, the subsequent dispensation of the Gospel 
 would have been unnecessary. So far, then, from 
 wishing to draw a veil over this partial imperfection, 
 we may confidently refer to it as affording one proof 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 137 
 
 the more of its Divine origin. Let not this observa- 
 tion be deemed paradoxical. No inference, from our 
 daily experience of the measures of Divine Provi- 
 dence, is more certain than that which assures us, 
 that however the Divine wisdom may contrive all 
 things relatively for the best, its system is that of 
 successive gradations, in no one stage of which, except, 
 perhaps, the very highest, our abstract notions of the 
 capability of good are effectively realized. The Le- 
 vitical institutions, we should recollect, were specially 
 adapted to meet the wants and to promote the prac- 
 tical moral habits of what, with reference to the 
 improved habits of modern times, we must consider 
 a subordinate state of society. Consequently, institu- 
 tions, which, at the present day, would certainly be 
 superfluous, and, probably, detrimental, may readily 
 be imagined, at that early period, to have been intro- 
 duced by Divine wisdom into a code, the object of 
 which was to operate beneficially upon the habits of 
 a peculiar people. It is not, therefore, only in its 
 obvious insufficiency as a means of spiritual grace 
 and expiation, that we willingly recognise the imper- 
 fection of the Mosaic ritual. Even its social enact- 
 ments, we readily acknowledge, are, in some cases, 
 stamped with an appearance of rudeness unseemly to 
 our present modes of thinking, and strongly charac- 
 teristic of an early stage of civil polity, and of com- 
 parative incivilization. As some of these points may 
 seem at first sight to trench upon some established 
 maxims of Christian morality, and have consequently 
 been often pointed out by the infidel as inconsistent 
 with the supposition, that institutions thus defective 
 could possibly be the work of a Divine legislator, it 
 may be €xpedient to examine them, on this occasion, 
 with some degree of detail. 
 
 The usage of polygamy, and the liberty of divorce, 
 
 are among the most prominent of these instances ; to 
 
 which may be added, the sanction given to domestic 
 
 slavery, and the severe punishments annexed to the 
 
 12* 
 
138 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 want of chastity in females, and to the disobedience 
 of children toward their parents. The advancers of 
 these objections, however, have, unfortunately for 
 their argument, overlooked the important distinction 
 which exists between the law of Moses and that of 
 Christ, namely, that the former, especially and pro- 
 minently, is, wkat the latter certainly is not, a code 
 of civil polity, and of criminal jurisdiction, no less 
 than a system of religious doctrine. In the legislator 
 of the Jews, therefore, was necessarily blended the 
 sternness of the jurist and of the judge, together with 
 the more attractive meekness of the spiritual teacher. 
 This circumstance, of course, imposed upon him the 
 duty of enforcing many painful, though expedient, 
 regulations, from the inconvenience of which, in 
 consequence of its exclusively spiritual character, the 
 covenant of the Gospel escapes.* The Christian 
 student may, accordingly, peruse the whole of the 
 writings of the New Testament with no other feelings 
 than those of love to God and man in their purest and 
 most exalted state ; whilst the unattractive enact- 
 ments of a criminal code, entering, as such works 
 must do, into all the possible details of crime, and 
 imposing upon each their peculiar penalties, are kept 
 out of view, as belonging to the department of the 
 civilian, and not of the divine. The penal ordinances 
 of the Jewish law, on the contrary, intermingled, as 
 they are, with the warmest breathings of humanity 
 
 • Some of the civil institutions of Moses strongly remind us of the weU- 
 known apologue, in which a dying husbandman is related to have induced 
 his sons to bestow a complete course of manual labour upon the soil of 
 his v^ineyard, by exciting their hopes of discovering a concealed trea3ure. 
 Had the Jewish legislator contented hhnself with merely enjoining cleanly 
 and wholesome habits to his uncivilized countrymen, it is probable that 
 the mandate would have been disregarded, or, at all events, attended to 
 in a slovenly and perfunctory manner. But by consecrating cleanliness 
 by a course of ritual performances, and subjecting the slightest leprous 
 tendency upon their persons, or the stains of mildew on the walls of their 
 dwellings, to a series of religious expiations, the end and purpose of civil- 
 ization were secured, even before the feelings which accompany a more 
 advanced stage of society were developed. We surely cajinot deny the 
 praise of great secular wisdom to Buch an arrangement. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 139 
 
 and religious purity, contain much which, though 
 often necessary as provisionary regulations, even in 
 the most advanced age of human civilization, must 
 still be, after all, unpleasant subjects of perusal ; 
 whilst also, as intended for the instruction and coer- 
 cion of a semi-barbarous people, they exhibit views 
 of possible crime, which, in our more improved state 
 of manners, can be contemplated only with feelings 
 of repugnance. Common candour, however, and a 
 very little degree of reflection, will serve to show us 
 that the objections raised against the Divine origin of 
 the Mosaic institutions, on this account, are without 
 the slightest foundation of justice. Once admitting 
 the possibility of the Divine Being condescending to 
 legislate, in a secular sense, for any society of human 
 creatures, it appears to follow, as a matter of absolute 
 necessity, that the regulations intended to operate 
 practically upon the habits of the governed must have 
 reference to the existing state of manners and of 
 knowledge : and not only so, but (unless we would 
 assert, that a people thus divinely instructed should 
 also be forced, by a continued miracle, into a precocity 
 of civilization naturally unattainable by any other 
 than a very slow and tedious process,) we must admit, 
 also, that a legislature, even of this high order, must 
 be content to tolerate, for a while, those minor abuses 
 which, humanly speaking, it is impossible imme- 
 diately to eradicate. Under such circumstances, the 
 true wisdom would appear to be to soften, by the 
 interposition of salutary and sober precautions, the 
 rash impetuosity of rude justice, as usually adminis- 
 tered by nations so little advanced in cultivation as 
 that now alluded to ; and whilst appearing, perhaps, 
 to connive at usages which the highest reason cannot 
 altogether approve, to set quietly into action better 
 principles, the sure ultimate result of which would be 
 the eradication of the original abuse, by a necessary 
 improvement of the moral habits. This latter is the 
 precise vindication of the law of Moses with regard 
 
140 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 to his permission of divorce adduced by our blessed 
 Saviour himself. " Moses, because of the hardness 
 of your hearts, suffered you to put away your wives : 
 but from the beginning it was not so." With regard 
 to the question of polygamy, in like manner we may, 
 perhaps, venture to observe that, although in an 
 advanced state of civilization, such as ours, a usage 
 of this description would completely unhinge society 
 by the jealousies it would introduce into families, the 
 neglect of education it would so frequently entail upon 
 the offspring, the heartlessness and selfishness it 
 would promote in the male sex, and the confusion of 
 relationship, w4th the minor inconveniences connected 
 with the transmission of property which it would 
 occasion, still, tjie evils resulting from such permis- 
 sion would certainly be far less prominent among the 
 less domestic habits and the less cultivated modes of 
 life of the earlier ages of the world. Under the last- 
 mentioned circumstances, it would also be attended 
 with something like a compensation for its own mis- 
 chief, by the incidental benefit which it might some- 
 times produce, In that low stage of society, where 
 the female sex has not yet attained to its proper influ- 
 ence, and where the practice of slavery, with its 
 general accompaniment of promiscuous concubinage, 
 might be expected to depress that more helpless por- 
 tion of the human race still lower from that point of 
 respectful attachment to which it is entitled, even 
 polygamy itself might often operate as a corrective 
 of the coarseness of an overbearing master, and might 
 tend to raise to a comparative elevation persons whose 
 lot might otherwise have been one of unmingled 
 abasement. The enactment contained in the 21st 
 chapter of Deuteronomy, and in verses from 10th to 
 14th, exactly corresponds with this view of the inten- 
 tion of the legislator, with respect to his toleration of 
 the usage in question. Admitting, however, the 
 truth of these observations, as resulting from the 
 acknowledged depravity of human passions, and the 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 141 
 
 slow process through which they attain to a higher 
 state of refinement, still we cannot but place in an 
 advantageous contrast with a permission accorded 
 only to the low state of society which it implies, the 
 dignified and beneficent admonition above quoted, of 
 the Founder of faith, by which he asserts, in behalf 
 of the female sex, that equality of consideration to 
 which, upon every principle of reason, humanity, and 
 reciprocity of affection, they are so obviously entitled. 
 Of the enactments of the Jewish law respecting 
 the treatment of slaves, it may be briefly observed, 
 that all of them are such as, whilst they appear to a 
 certain degree to tolerate a necessary evil, in fact hold 
 out the strongest obstacle to its general prevalence, 
 and mitigate, in a great variety of Avays, the cruelty 
 and abuses which are too apt to accompany the pos- 
 session of this species of j^uhority. The necessary 
 manumission of all slaves of Jewish origin at the 
 return of the year of jubilee, by diminishing their 
 commercial value, must have operated as a strong 
 discouragement to the system of slavery in general; 
 whilst even during the continuance of their servitude, 
 the infliction upon them of even a slight bodily injury 
 by their owners gave them a title to the recovery of 
 their liberty. "If a man smite the eye of his ser- 
 vant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish, he shall 
 let him go free for his eye's sake : and if he smite out 
 his man-servant's tooth, or his maid-servant's tooth, 
 he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake."* Even 
 in our own days the existence of such a law as this 
 now quoted, would not probably be amiss in those 
 portions of the globe, which, by an unfortunate com- 
 bination of causes, are destined to witness a continu- 
 ance of a system of compulsory servitude, even 
 under the profession of the equalizing and beneficent 
 principles of Christianity. The following regulation, 
 extracted from the book of Deuteronomy, affords 
 another proof that it was from no friendly feeling 
 
 • Exodus xxi. 26, 27. 
 
142 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 towards the usage of slavery that the toleration of it 
 was acknowledged by the Mosaic institutions. " Thou 
 shah not deliver unto his master the servant which is 
 escaped from his master unto thee. He shall dwell 
 with thee, even among you, in that place which he 
 shall choose in one of thy gates, where it liketh him 
 best: thou shalt not oppress him."* 
 
 The trial of female chastity, by the test of the 
 water of jealousy, as prescribed in Numb. v. 11, &c. 
 has been frequently compared to the custom of the 
 ordeal, as practised by our Saxon ancestors, and, of 
 course, the inference aimed at by the impugners of 
 revelation has been, that the former usage, like the 
 latter, is a proof of the ignorance and barbarous 
 superstition of the age which admitted it into its 
 legislative code. The cases, are, however, widely 
 different. The expectation of a continued miraculous 
 interference in our own days, so often as we might, 
 in our arrogance, challenge Heaven for the purpose, 
 would, indeed, denote either the darkest intellectual 
 blindness, or the grossest presumption ; but it would 
 be perfectly rational and consistent under the theo- 
 cracy which constituted the civil polity of the Jews. 
 There could be no arrogance in looking for the special 
 interposition of the Deity in cases where he himself 
 had solemnly promised it ; but there might be want 
 of faith, and consequently sin, in abstaining from a 
 usage thus solemnly instituted. It has also been 
 well observed, as an important distinction between 
 the two instances in question, that whereas, accord- 
 ing to the usage of the ordeal, a miracle was required 
 for the acquittal of the accused party; under the 
 Levitical rule, on the contrary, a miracle was neces- 
 sary for the purpose of condemnation. In the former 
 case, the failure of the experiment involved the 
 punishment of the innocent; in the latter it could 
 possibly lead only, at the very worst, to the acquittal 
 of the guilty. 
 
 • Deut. xxiii. 15. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 143 
 
 With regard to the last mentioned of the foregoing 
 objections, namely, the occasionally very severe ex- 
 ertion of parental authority, even to the extent of 
 taking away life, as sanctioned by the law of Moses,* 
 it cannot be better met than by extracting, in this 
 place, the words of Bishop Watson, as given in his 
 celebrated Apology for the Bible. " You think * that 
 law in Deuteronomy inhuman and brutal, which 
 authorizes parents, the father and mother, to bring 
 their own children to have them stoned to death, for 
 what it is pleased to call stubbornness.' — You are 
 aware, I suppose, that paternal power amongst the 
 Romans, the Gauls, the Persians, and other nations, 
 was of the most arbitrary kind : that it extended to 
 the taking away the life of the child. I do not know 
 whether the Israelites, in the time of Moses, exercised 
 this paternal power : it was not a custom adopted by 
 all nations, but it was by many ; and in the infancy 
 of society, before individual families had coalesced 
 into communities, it was, probably, very general. 
 Now Moses, by this law, which you esteem brutal 
 and inhuman, hindered such an extravagant power 
 from being either introduced or exercised amongst 
 the Israelites. This law is so far from countenancing 
 the arbitrary power of a father over the life of his 
 child, that it takes from him the power of accusing 
 the child before a magistrate. — The father and the 
 mother of the child must agree in bringing the child 
 to judgment, and it is not by their united will that 
 the child was to be condemned to death : the elders 
 of the city were to judge whether the accusation Avas 
 true ; and the accusation was to be not merely, as 
 you insinuate, that the child was stubborn, but that 
 he was ' stubborn and rebellious, a glutton, and a 
 drunkard.' Considered in this light, you must allow 
 the law to have been a humane restriction of a power 
 improper to be lodged with any parent." 
 
 * Deut. xxi. 18, <tc. , 
 
144 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER XVI. 
 
 Ofthe Evidence afforded to the authenticity of the Levitical InstU 
 tutions, by the onerous Nature of its Ritual, and the present 
 State of the Jewish People. , 
 
 The whole series of the Jewish records, then, if 
 attempted to be accounted for by merely natural 
 causes, presents a tissue of difficulties which it would 
 he quite impossible to explain. The miracles, the 
 history of which constitutes so large a portion of their 
 subject matter, unlike those false prodigies, which 
 usually crowd the annals of dark and superstitious 
 periods, as has been already observed, so far from 
 bearing the appearance of a gratuitous super-addition 
 to common-place event, are absolutely necessary, as 
 fundamental facts, to give consistence and probability 
 to the whole narrative. The difficulty cannot be got 
 over by supposing the documents in question to be a 
 partial, much less an entire, forgery. The former 
 hypothesis does not meet the case, the latter presents 
 an absolute impossibility. It is contrary to all ex- 
 perience, as it would be contrary to all reason, that 
 any considerable and ancient nation should exist, the 
 whole of whose written annals should be false; and 
 yet, in the case of the Jews, to stop short at the par- 
 tial admission of the authenticity of their recorded 
 transactions, to the exclusion of any preternatural 
 agency in their production, would drive us into the 
 admission of positions not one degree more tenable. 
 The fact of the real occurrence of miracles, however, 
 once granted, there appears no reason why we should 
 attempt to set other limits to their extent than those 
 which the Scriptures expressly assign to them. 
 That this portion of history contains the records of a 
 nation very far from advanced in civilization is. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 145 
 
 indeed, obvious, from the slightest perusal. But, as 
 has been already remarked, this circumstance only 
 adds to our admiration of the awfully solemn theisti- 
 cal doctrines and the spirit of pure and benevolent 
 humanity which pervades so large a portion of it. 
 The exceptions to this indulgent spirit, where they 
 occur, have, indeed, been admitted to be striking; but 
 these very exceptions, as being directed, almost ex- 
 clusively, against the abominations of idolatry, which 
 nothing short of absolute extermination could have 
 prevented from rendering the whole of these admira- 
 ble enactments abortive, are themselves a strong 
 internal evidence of the wisdom in which they 
 were conceived, and of the high source from which 
 they emanate. Admit the Mosaic law really to have 
 been what it professes to be, and we see, at once, 
 the absolute necessity of these seemingly harsh pro- 
 visions ; consider it to be the work of a mere human 
 legislator, and we are at a loss to trace in them any 
 purposes of policy, or any features of consistency, 
 feishop Warburton is of opinion, that the single fact 
 of the silence of Moses, with regard to a future life 
 of rewards or punishments, is a sufficient proof of his 
 Divine legation. We may restate this argument 
 more palpably and broadly by asserting that no legis- 
 lator could, with the slightest chance of success, 
 assert the bold theory of a theocracy extending its 
 direct superintending care to the minutest circum- 
 stances of domestic life, and promising a special 
 miracle for almost every deviation from the law of 
 strict obedience, were not that assertion borne out by 
 fact. Not only, however, does Moses repeatedly 
 hazard this assertion, but he appeals, again and again, 
 to the positive experience of his people for the proof 
 of the reality of the miracles which he narrates. We 
 cannot meet this argument, and thus get rid of the 
 difficulty, by supposing that the books which bear his 
 name were the production of a later period. Such an 
 hypothesis has already been shown to be improbable 
 13 
 
146 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 in the highest degree ; and even if granted, it would 
 create more perplexity than it would remove. The 
 later books of the Old Testament not only pre-suppose 
 the existence of the writings of Moses, such as they 
 have descended to our times, but they also, in their 
 turn, bear witness to other and subsequent miracles, 
 for the truth of which they make their own appeal 
 to the testimony of contemporary witnesses. To 
 suppose these last mentioned compositions, again, fo 
 be forgeries, is still rushing deeper and deeper into 
 impossibilities, for the sake of avoiding the one pri- 
 mary admission which explains the whole, namely, 
 the Divine origin of the Christian, and consequently 
 of the Levitical dispensation. It has been well ob- 
 served, that the annual celebration of stated festivals 
 and solemnities by any people is amongst the surest 
 guarantee which can possibly be given to later times 
 of the authenticity of the received traditions of their 
 early ancestry. Such institutions are, in fact, a 
 periodical reenactment of the most influential events 
 in the history of nations; and from the actual identity 
 of ceremonial which,, for the most part, accompanies 
 their repetition, they bring the usages of long extin- 
 guished ages more immediately, and more correctly, 
 before the eye than any other human contrivance 
 with which we are acquainted. But the whole 
 political history of the Jews was that of the regular 
 recurrence of religious festivals, all illustrating and 
 confirming each other, but each also having its own 
 respective and peculiar object of commemoration. 
 Many of them also, it should be observed, were of an 
 extremely onerous and costly character, such as no 
 people would willingly adopt, for a long succession 
 of ages, without some strong assignable reason, 
 whilst some of their habitual institutions seemed 
 almost to militate against their very existence as an 
 independent people. Of the former kind was the 
 Becessity imposed upon all persons adopting the 
 Mosaic ritual of repairing to Jerusalem annually, at 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 147 
 
 the season of the great festivals : as instances of the 
 latter, may be mentioned the observance of the 
 sabbatical year, which, from the remission of taxes, 
 stated by Josephus to have been granted to the Jews, 
 on that account, by Alexander, appears, if we are to 
 give credit to that historian, to have been, in some 
 degree, maintained so late as the time of that 
 monarch ;* and the almost superstitious observance 
 of the weekly Sabbath, of which Pompey and others, 
 during the several sieges of Jerusalem, are said to 
 have taken such pernicious advantage, for the purpose 
 of urging their attacks. 
 
 Now surely, if we find a particular people, week 
 after week, year after year, and period after period, 
 with uniformity and precision, as well as with great 
 personal cost and inconvenience, repeating again and 
 again the same routine of social and religious cere- 
 monies, it would seem as certain as certainty can 
 make it, that some events must really have occurred, 
 in the early history of that nation, which rendered 
 such usages imperative upon their ancestors. No 
 assignable reason can be suggested why the later 
 Jews should be found annually celebrating their Pass- 
 over, their Pentecost, their feast of Tabernacles, 
 excepting the obvious one, that the recurrence of the 
 stated season, in each successive year, brought with 
 it the recollection of the important events to which 
 
 * It must be confessed, that the observance of the sabbatical year seems 
 never to have been very rigidly adhered to by the Jews ; probably, because 
 of all the Mosaic institutions it was the one which required the largest 
 degree of faith in the special protection of Providence, and which mili- 
 tated most against the natural principle of covetousness. It should be 
 remembered, however, that the disobedience of the nation on this point was 
 expressly foretold, and a future judgment denounced against them, on that 
 account, by Moses himself ; (Leviticus xxvi. 34, 35.) and that this specific 
 reason is assigned (2 Chronicles xxvi. 21.) for the infliction upon them of 
 the Babylonish captivity. The force of the argument contained in the 
 observation to which this note is appended is not, however, affected by 
 this admission. The Jews, at all events, acknowledged their conscientious 
 obligation to the observance of the sabbatical year as a Divine institu- 
 tion, which they certainly would not have done, had they not been con- 
 vincedj in spite of their own wishes and apparent interests to the contrary, 
 dmt eiich was really its character. 
 
148 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 those institutions respectively referred, and to which 
 they might be continuously traced back. The same 
 course of argument, as demonstrative of the authen- 
 ticity of the Mosaic narrative, will apply, if possible, 
 with still greater force to the great standing miracle 
 of the present condition of the Jews, as we find them 
 scattered through almost every habitable portion of 
 the globe. Striking effects must have had adequate 
 cause. What, then, was the cause which placed, and 
 retains, that singular people in their present peculiar 
 and unparalleled circumstances ? By what theory, 
 if we discard that of a special Divine agency, and of 
 that obstinate tenacity of political life, produced by 
 the exclusive character of their traditional usages, are 
 we to explain a fact so completely at variance with 
 all our experience derived from other quarters ? The 
 name and traceable lineage of every other ancient 
 nation, with whose history we are acquainted, and, 
 amongst the rest, of the ten heretical Israelitish 
 tribes themselves, have disappeared from the research 
 of the antiquarian, at no long period after they have 
 ceased to exist as a separate body politic. And yet, 
 of the dynasties and nations which at the present 
 moment advance their claim to the highest antiquity, 
 not one was in political existence at the time of the 
 extinction of the Jews as a constituted people. The 
 Byzantine empire dated its birth nearly three hun- 
 dred years after that period, and yet it is now nearly 
 four hundred years since it has perished, with its long 
 line of emperors, by the natural process of decay. 
 The most ancient monarchy of Europe, that of France, 
 had its origin more than four hundred years sub- 
 sequent to the same epoch ; and if we look elsewhere 
 to the surrounding states, we find a similar spirit of 
 change giving a new form, at different and successive 
 intervals, to the language, habits, religion, and col- 
 lective character of every portion of the civilized world* 
 It is no answer to this remarkable peculiarity attach- 
 ing to the Jews to assert that they pwie their extra? 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 149 
 
 ordinary vitality, as a people, to natural causes. 
 Those causes, ii they mean any thing, must be their 
 religion and social institutions. But whence did 
 institutions possessing this remarkable property of 
 making the actual decay of one nation more pro- 
 tracted than the whole date of the existence of any 
 other, derive their source ? Still we must revert to 
 the same, and the only satisfactory solution. Second- 
 ary causes have been more specially directed in their 
 instance, and throughout the whole of their history, 
 to the promotion. of some remarkable result, than m 
 that of any other branch of the human race. If it be 
 asked, why has this been so, the Christian stands in 
 no need of an explanation. On the contrary, he 
 sees in this fact only one link the more in the chain 
 of consistent events ; another proof of the Divine 
 superintendence, manifesting itself, as in the earlier 
 ages of the world so in the present, in confirmation 
 of the religion which he acknowledges. On the other 
 hand, the sceptic must add this to the already over- 
 charged list of difficulties with which his cold and 
 hopeless theory is encumbered, and which (as to us 
 it would seem so inconsequentially) he adopts, rather 
 than submit to acknowledge that the sublimest spe- 
 cimen of religious philosophy and of social ethics 
 which the history of human knowledge records could 
 possibly be, under any circumstances, the direct gift 
 of the Creator to his creatures.* 
 
 * The great Cond^ is said lo have replied to certain infidel arguments, 
 that it was perfectly vain to assail the credibility of the Christian revela- 
 tion, so long as so singular a miracle as that of the existing state of the 
 Jewish people could be appealed to in its support. The additional lapso 
 Cf a century and a half since the death of that eminent person has assuredly 
 act rendered the miracle to which he alluded less convincing. 
 
 13* 
 
150 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER XVII. 
 
 Of the tendency of the prophetic Books of the Old Testament, 
 
 The object of this dissertation being chiefly to point 
 out the general congruity of the Holy Scriptures with 
 themselves., and with the universally acknowledged 
 phenomena o^ human nature, in other words, to dwell 
 more immediately upon the internal evidence w^hich 
 they bear of their own authenticity, it will scarcely 
 fall within its design to dwell upon the very strong 
 confirmation afforded by prophecy to the truth of 
 Christianity. In a work so limited in compass as the 
 present, it were impossible to do justice to so extensive 
 a subject, and which has already been cogently illus- 
 trated in many first-rate standard works:* nor would 
 the minute and circumstantial detail, which such an 
 examination would require, accord with the very 
 general view of the more superficial and popular 
 objections to the credibility of our religion, which is 
 all that is now attempted to be taken. With regard, 
 therefore, to this truly importaiit branch of the Chris- 
 tian evidences, it will be our object to dwell chiefly 
 upon the more broad and general character of the 
 writings of the Jewish prophets, as forming a kind 
 of intermediate dispensation between the Levitical 
 institutions, the strict and formalletterof which they 
 are calculated to spiritualize, and the covenant of the 
 Gospel, of the real nature and destination of which 
 they gave the first clear intimations. 
 
 Now, among the foremost impressions left upon 
 our minds by their perusal, is that of the internal 
 
 • Few more satisfactory works, in confirmation of the inspiration of 
 Scripture, have appeared within our own time, than that of the Rev. 
 Alexander Keith, entitled "Evidence of the truth of the Christian Religion, 
 derived from the literal fulfilment of prophecy." We know of no work 
 of the same length so well adapted to direct the attention of ecepticai 
 ^inds to the serious investigat* .n of that subject. 
 
WITH HUMAN UEASOlff^ "^^ <5 T \ 
 
 proof which they bear of their own ivjlTienticity, from 
 the total want of system and definite purpose which A ; 
 they display, and the entire absence of any personal ^ •* 
 interest or advantage to their respective authors, if 
 we., put out of the question the appropriate position 
 which they are calculated to occupy between a reli- 
 gion of types and one of antitypes, between one of 
 ritual expiations and one of spiritual holiness ; and 
 the strong testimony which they thus afford retro- 
 spectively to the truth of the Mosaic, and prospec- 
 tively to that of the Christian covenant. It would 
 most assuredly be impossible to account for the com^ 
 position of the larger and more prominent proportion 
 of these truly remarkable documents, by referring it 
 to the ordinary human motives of self-interest, or of 
 jiational or personal vanity. That they were not 
 written for the purpose of giving an additional sanc- 
 tion to the Levitical institutions is obvious from the 
 fact, that they frequently speak of them in language 
 so depreciating, as almost to imply a spirit of hos- 
 tility : whilst, on the other hand, that their object 
 was not that of casting any slur upon the authenticity 
 of that ritual is equally evident, from the fact that 
 they explicitly assert its Divine origin, and attribute 
 the severe visita;tions which befel their countrymen 
 to the wrath of Providence, for their continued viola^ 
 tion of its enactments. Now, admitting that the 
 Jewish prophets were sent into the world at their 
 respective epochs, for the purpose of weaning the 
 public mind gradually from the provisional establish- 
 ment of Moses, and preparing it for the reception of 
 evangelical truth, all these characteristics which mark 
 their writings are precisely what might have been 
 expected : but, we repeat, no other solution with 
 which we are acquainted would meet the case. Any 
 idea of personal aggrandizement, as the motive of the 
 line adopted by their authors, was again obviously 
 out of the question. To tlxe Jewish community they 
 must have appeared, from ilijeir continued anticipa- 
 
152 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 tions of national calamity and discomfiture, any thing 
 rather than patriotic ; and by the uncompromising 
 censure with which they lashed the vices of the sove- 
 reigns of the day, they must have expected to draw 
 down, as we know that they actually did, the most 
 violent persecution upon their own heads. Yet with 
 all these apparently unpopular characteristics, their 
 books (such we must presume was the unanswerable 
 evidence of their inspiration at the time of their pro- 
 duction) have been received as infallible oracles by 
 the very people whose crimes they denounced, whose 
 religious prejudices they offended, and whose political 
 ruin they foreboded ; and, from that day to the pre- 
 sent, have been reverentially transmitted from father 
 to son, through every change of evil and good fortune, 
 and referred to in their original language by that 
 inflexible people under almost every possible modifi- 
 cation of manners, and in almost every climate of the 
 earth. 
 
 The gradual preparation for a new and better 
 system than that of the provisional institutions of 
 Moses, as hinted at by himself, and slowly developed 
 in the subsequent writings of the prophets, seems to 
 have been admirably contrived by Providence, accord- 
 ing to the continually shifting circumstances of the 
 Jewish people. Moses, it has been already remarked, 
 alludes to the eventual abrogation of his own ritual 
 by the substitution of the covenant of the Gospel, in 
 language sufficiently precise to satisfy us that he was 
 fully aware that such would be the fact, though in a 
 manner not so prominent as to derogate from the 
 veneration claimed for his own enactments, by an- 
 nouncing more boldly than was expedient their real 
 character. But as time advanced, and when after 
 a course of successive ages the Levitical rites had 
 been suflRciently long established to have completely 
 identified themselves with the national habits, the 
 Almighty appears purposely to have become more and 
 more explicit in his intimation of his ultimate purpose. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 153 
 
 The substitution of spiritual, in the place of ritual, 
 holiness ; the one efficient expiation of sin, destined 
 to be once for all offered and completed in the suffer- 
 ings and subsequent glorifying of the Messiah, and 
 the communication of the blessings of the Gospel to 
 the G-entiles equally with the Jews, are expressly 
 alluded to so early as the time of David, in many of 
 the Psalms attributed to. that monarch and his con- 
 temporaries, in a manner obviously calculated to 
 subtract from the then existing reliance upon the 
 efficacy of the sacerdotal sacrifice. " I will not reprove 
 thee," are the words of the 50th Psalm, "for thy sacri- 
 fices, or thy burnt-offerings, have been continually 
 before me. I will take no bullock out of thy house, 
 nor he-goat out of thy folds ; for every beast of the 
 forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. 
 I know all the fowls upon the mountains, and the 
 wild beasts of the fields are mine. If I were hungry 
 I would not tell thee ; for the world is mine, and the 
 fulness thereof. Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink 
 the blood of goats ?* Offer unto God thanksgivings 
 and pay thy vows unto the Most High^ and call upon me 
 in the day of trouble : I will deliver thee and thou shalt 
 glorify me." Again we read in the 40th Psalm, 
 ^ Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire : mifie ears 
 hast thou opened : burnt- offering and sin-offering hast 
 thou not required. Then said t^lo I come : in the vol- 
 ume of the book it is written of me, I delight to do thy 
 
 * The words of Isaiah are exactly to the same purport. " To what pur- 
 pose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me 1 saith the Lord ; I am 
 full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts ; and I delight 
 not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of goats. When ye come to 
 appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my 
 courts 1 Bring no more vain oblations ; incense is an abomination unto 
 mej the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot 
 away with : it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons 
 and your appointed feasts my soul hateth : they are a trouble unto me ; 
 I am weary to bear them. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will 
 hide mine eyes from you ; yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not 
 hear : your hands are full of blood. Wash you, make you clean, put 
 away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes : cease to do evil, 
 learn to do well ; seek judgment ; relieve the oppressed : judge the father* 
 less^ plead for the widow." — Isaiah i. 11. et. se^. 
 
154 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 will, my God, yea thy law is within my heart. ^^ The 
 22d Psalai contains so minute a detail of some of the 
 circumstances attending our blessed Saviour's cruci- 
 fixion as to have the appearance rather of the clear 
 narrative of subsequent history, than the mysterious 
 allusive hints of prophecy ; whilst in the latter part 
 of that singular composition, the eventual extension 
 of the benefits of the Redeemer's expiatory atonement 
 to all the nations of the earth is expressly asserted. 
 " All the ends of the world shall remember and turn 
 unto the Lord, and all the kindreds of the nations 
 shall worship before Thee. For the kingdom is the 
 Lord's, and he is the Governor among the nations. 
 All they that be fat upon earth (all the potentates of 
 the earth) shall eat and worship : all they that go 
 down to the dust shall bow before him : and none can 
 keep alive his own soul." In proportion as the com- 
 pletion of the time contemplated by Providence drew 
 nearer, this tendency to derogate from the efiective- 
 ness of their existing ritual, and to anticipate a more 
 perfect system still hidden in the womb of futurity, 
 becomes more and more evident in the writings of 
 the later prophets. And, accordingly, we know that 
 in consequence of these repeated allusions, all bearing 
 prospectively to the same point, and more especially 
 of those contained in the Book of Daniel, the appear- 
 ance of a Prince and Saviour was an object of earnest 
 expectation among the Jews at the time of our 
 Redeemer's birth ; though from feelings of nationality 
 they were disposed, in direct contradiction to the very 
 prophecies to which they referred, to restrict the 
 object of his mission to their own peculiar nation. 
 Now it cannot be denied that, upon the presumption 
 that the intentions of Providence were what the 
 Christian supposes, this gradual repeal of the earlier 
 covenant, and preparation of the human mind for the 
 promulgation of that which was to displace it, was 
 wisely contrived. The system pursued was like that 
 which we witness in some of the common operations 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 155 
 
 of physical nature, where the effete animal organ, 
 which is to be superseded by the substitution of one 
 more complete, detaches itself slowly and almost 
 imperceptibly, and finally drops off when the process 
 for the production of that which is to follow is com- 
 pleted. Another, and no trifling advantage, also, was 
 obtained for the eventual advancement of Christianity 
 by this peculiar arrangement ; namely, the confirma- 
 tion of its authenticity subsequently to its promulga- 
 tion, by the evidence of previously received prophecy. 
 The same writings which, before the proclamation of 
 the Grospel covenant, seem to have been intended only 
 for the single purpose of weaning the minds of the 
 Jews from a too strong attachment to the mere cere- 
 monial of their law, and of inculcating principles of 
 more substantial holiness, served, after the coming of 
 Christ, to afford the most irrefragable proofs of the 
 reality of his mission. In consequence of this double 
 purpose, which has been answered by the prophetic 
 writings, it is that their importance, as means of 
 instruction, is at this moment as great to the society 
 of Christians as it was originally to the people for 
 whose use they appeared to be more immediately 
 intended : a circumstance in which we trace again 
 another close analogy with the general economy of 
 the Creator, almost all of whose visible works are 
 adapted for the promotion of other and secondary 
 purposes, after the first and more ostensible object has 
 been attained. 
 
 Without, then, carrying this part of our ar^ment 
 further than the foregoing observations, and leaving 
 the detailed examination of the actual fulfilment of 
 prophecy, with the unanswerable evidence which it 
 affords in confirmation of the truth of our religion, to 
 the admirable works which have already been written 
 on that subject, it will only be remarked, in this 
 place, with regard to this portion of the Old Testa- 
 ment, as has already been done with respect to the 
 historical books, that every possible theory which we 
 
156 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 can suggest as the motive of their production, saving 
 and excepting that which presupposes the truth of 
 Christianity, and the consequent real reference of these 
 writings to that coming dispensation, is full of incon- 
 gruities and inconsistencies. Why, in the very com- 
 mencement of the Book of Genesis, a distinct hint 
 should have been given, that a descendant from the 
 first stock of the human lineage should one day prove 
 a means of a reconciliation of man with his Maker ; 
 why a repetition of the same promise, hut in still 
 more explicit language, should have been recorded as 
 having been made to Abraham and his immediate 
 descendants ; why Moses, in giving a law to his 
 people, which at the first aspect seemed destined for 
 perpetuity, and which was made imperative upon the 
 whole lineage of Israel, under the most fearful sanc- 
 tions, should have distinctly, though incidentally, 
 asserted that it was eventually to be cancelled by one 
 vested with still higher authority ; why, as time pro- 
 ceeded, subsequent presumed inspired writers should 
 agree in depreciating that very law, the Divine 
 authority of which they confidently asserted, and 
 finally should almost explicitly, and without disguise 
 or figure, announce the approach of a higher legislator, 
 who was to supersede all existing institutions, and 
 break down the partition wall between Jew and Gen- 
 tile ; why those books should have been received as 
 inspired documents by the very people whose sins 
 they denounced, and whose ruin they anticipated, and 
 why, as we know historically to have been the fact, 
 the expectation of the whole Jewish nation should 
 have been eagerly looking for the promised Messiah 
 at the very period of Christ's appearance in the human 
 form ; why all this chain of connected circumstances 
 should have existed, if there was really no connecting 
 principle in the actual state of things to produce it, 
 and no concert or combination in the respective 
 parties, it would seem perfectly impossible to explain. 
 If one main idea, not brought ambitiously and pro- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 167 
 
 minently forward, but couched often in allegorical 
 allusions, often in casual expressions, and in language 
 which until its fulfilment must often have been abso- 
 lutely inexplicable, be really traceable from first to 
 last, from almost the first page of the first Book of 
 Moses, down to the conclusion of Malachi : if with 
 this single key to decipher each respective composi- 
 tion, all separately become unambiguous in their 
 meaning, and collectively form one consistent whole; 
 and if without that key each part would be at once 
 at variance with itseli, and irreconcilable with the 
 others, a tissue of improbable legends, and of unreal, 
 bacause unnecessary, miracles ; and if, in addition to 
 this, the grand question of some religion, or no reli- 
 gion, be finally at stake in proportion as we incline 
 to this side, or its opposite, we surely must admit 
 • that the combination of probabilities thus arrived at 
 is fully sufficient to command our assent to the con- 
 fessedly astounding arrangement of human events, 
 which those documents agree in recording. It is not 
 for a moment our wish to deny or conceal what every 
 Christian must have felt, the startling sensation 
 which the recital of such preternatural occurrences as 
 those related in the Scriptures is calculated to produce 
 when considered separately from the great transcen- 
 dental* scheme of which they form the preparatory 
 means. But the cure for such doubts is to be found 
 in considering our religion as a whole ; in examining 
 the extent and character of our spiritual necessities ; 
 in weighing one seeming contradiction against its 
 contradictory opposite ; and in satisfying our minds, 
 that by the demonstrable constitution of our nature, 
 no other alternative is allowed us than that of choos- 
 ing between the lowest possible state of moral degra- 
 dation, namely, that of complete irreligion, and the 
 admission of the necessity of some specific Divine 
 arrangement, by which the acknowledged defects of 
 the existing order of things may be met and rectified. 
 If these, then, are the necessary conclusions to 
 14 
 
158 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 which every earnest examination of our purest moral 
 tendencies, and of the phenomena of the creation, 
 must ultimately lead us, it is obvious that to minds 
 thus prepared the seemingly improbable, because 
 unusual, interferences of the Creator with the course 
 of his own laws, recorded in the sacred writings, lose 
 at once the g-eater portion of their powers of embar- 
 rassment. To a Christian and a Sceptic, accordingly, 
 even where the natural faculties of the understanding 
 may be granted to be essentially equal, the self-same 
 statement of facts upon these points will lead to 
 directly opposite impressions. The former, if he 
 reason conclusively, and with that masculine grasp 
 of mind which neither seeks after unnecessary para- 
 dox, nor flinches from the charge of credulity in com- 
 pliance with the prejudices of the indolent and half- 
 informed, will carefully examine, in the first place, 
 the main and primary propositions of religion, and, 
 if he find them established upon a basis which it is 
 absolutely impossible to overturn, will then be content 
 to take them with all their consequences and accom- 
 panying difficulties, and to pursue his course, step by 
 step, from the simplest principles of natural theology 
 to the highest facts of well-attested revelation. But 
 nothing, on the contrary, can be more inconsequential 
 than the reasoning of the anti-Christian Theist. He 
 admits the general proposition of the existence of a 
 Deity, but he ridicules as superstitious every practical 
 attempt to prove his moral superintendence over his 
 own works. He will grant that the universe is wisely 
 put together, yet he is offended at every attempt to 
 demonstrate the workings of that wisdom, by direct- 
 ing our attention to final causes. He is obliged, by 
 a weight of evidence which it is impossible to resist, 
 to admit that the world must have had a beginning, 
 and yet he argues as though the assertion of the pos- 
 sibility of any deviation from tlie present quiet course 
 of events were the highest absurdity. He is en- 
 tangled by difficulties at every step. He denies the 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 159 
 
 mysterious facts of revelation, yet by his own admis- 
 sion he has assented to the far more portentous posi- 
 tions of natural religion, with all their formidable, 
 and, if Christianity be false, unexplained, anomalies. 
 If he can succeed in persuading himself that the 
 recorded miracles of one period are the inventions of 
 a barbarous people, or the fabrications of imposture, 
 he has still to prove the same proposition in like 
 manner of the next, and of the next after them, or he 
 does nothing. If he deny the authenticity of the 
 Jewish records in all their parts, he still has to account 
 for the remarkable fact of the past and present exist- 
 ence of the Jews themselves. If he make a like 
 attack upon the authenticity of the Christian Scrips 
 lures, he has again to explain, as he can, the undeni- 
 able phenomenon of the first origin and growth of the 
 Christian community itself, challenging inquiry, as 
 we know that it did, in the face of an enlightened and 
 inimical age, as to the reality of the miracles to which 
 it appealed for its warrant, and persevering in its faith 
 in defiance of the outstretched arm of secular power. 
 If, finally, taking the whole records of revelation to 
 pieces, he can establish a seeming detached and 
 occasional improbability in some one part severed 
 from the rest, he has still to explain how and why, by 
 what accident, for contrivance is evidently out of the 
 question, these apparently anomalous members, so 
 astounding when considered separately, should thus 
 happen to combine into one continuous and consistent 
 whole ; from what cause is it that, in a retrospect 
 made at this moment of the entire annals of our 
 religion, no contrariety of purpose should be observa- 
 ble in the series, no one link in the chain of contriv- 
 ance be missing ; but that all, from first to last, should 
 appear as the work of one single author, the elaborate 
 developement of one single pervading idea, which, 
 though never forming the ostensible subject matter, 
 should still be traceable alike through the history, 
 the poetry, the ritual, and the prophecies of the Jew 
 
160 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 ish nation, till it finally expanded into the completion 
 of the presumed great scheme of Providence in the 
 form of the Christian revelation. Whilst such are 
 the acknowledged difficulties attendant upon theistical 
 scepticism, it surely is not for its professors to pride 
 themselves in their own clear and consistent views, 
 and to charge their believing opponents with credulity 
 and superstition. 
 
 CHAPTER XVIII. 
 
 Consiste7icy between the Covenant of Moses and that of Christ, as 
 having an expiation for Sin as their leading object. The Levitical 
 expiations were confessedly ineffectual. It must be presumed^ 
 therefore, that the great purpose of the Gospel Dispensation was 
 to correct this deficiency. 1 he popular Objections to the Doctrine 
 of ChrisVs Atonement examined. 
 
 There is this very striking and obvious distinction 
 between the Mosaic covenant and that of Christ, that, 
 while both claim equally to be a communication from 
 heaven, the former is confessedly, and by its own 
 express admission, a mere preparatory arrangement, 
 adapted to the habits of a single people, for the intro- 
 duction of a more perfect system; whilst the latter, 
 addressing itself to the whole human race indiscrimi- 
 nately, is declared to be absolutely final, the grand 
 summary of all such theological knowledge as man in 
 this world can ever hope to attain to, and the com- 
 pletion of his reconciliation with God. It is thus 
 that, from their relative position, the one dispensation 
 bears reciprocal evidence to the authenticity of the 
 other. When considered as the nurse and forerunner 
 of Christianity, Judaism acquires a consistency of 
 character, which, if adduced as a dispensation com- 
 plete and entire in itself, it manifestly could lay no 
 claim to. Its perfection is altogether of a relative and 
 not of a positive character. It is precisely what might 
 have been expected of the Divine wisdom, when con- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 161 
 
 descending to legislate for the temporal, no less than 
 for the spiritual, concerns of an unpolished people, 
 and intent upon occupying a certain, otherwise com- 
 pletely dark, portion in the moral history of our nature, 
 by the establishment of provisional institutions, 
 especially adapted to that peculiar emergency. On 
 the other hand, it bears no one characteristic which 
 would justify us- in considering it as intended for the 
 benefit of the whole human race, or for any nation 
 very far advanced in spiritual holiness. Christianity, 
 then, thus considered, comes to us as the continuation 
 and completion of a course of Divine agency, which 
 had been in operation from the very beginning of the 
 world, and which, after a long series of delays and 
 impediments, the result of the opposition afforded to it 
 by man's vices and ignorance, was at length fully 
 developed at the earliest period which would admit 
 of its promulgation. It is thus that the same miracles 
 which originally bore evidence to the truth of the 
 Mosaic mission serve to confirm also that superior 
 form of religion which grew out of it, and finally- 
 superseded it ; whilst to that strong weight of previous 
 testimony must be added, as accessory and accumula- 
 tive proof, all the recorded miracles connected with 
 the coming of Christ ; those declared to have been 
 performed immediately by himself, and all those stu- 
 pendous events which were subsequently borne wit- 
 ness to by his first followers and the primitive Church. 
 If, then, the evidence of the authenticity of the Mosaic 
 law, when considered singly, is strong, and strong 
 assuredly it is, that of the certainty of the religion of 
 Christ is still more so, whether we look to the number 
 of miracles to which it can appeal, the intrinsic purity 
 of its precepts, the more spiritual character of the 
 devotional feeling which it inculcates, the advanced 
 state of human manners and knowledge which pre- 
 vailed at the time of its first establishment, and 
 the much more extensive theatre of human society 
 in which the phenomena of its promulgation were 
 14* 
 
162 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 enacted. Considered, then, retrospectively, as the 
 slow developement of a long series of elaborate con- 
 trivances, purchased often by a suspension of the 
 established laws of the universe, and uniformly con- 
 ducted by the fostering care of its Divine Founder, 
 through every seeming fluctuation of fortune to its 
 final establishment, it suggests a truly awful and 
 appalling idea of the vast importance of the institu- 
 tions which were thus solemnly introduced. Pro- 
 vidence, for the most part, moves onward so quietly 
 and imperceptibly toward the accomplishment of its 
 designs, that we cannot but deem such a striking 
 departure from its usual simplicity of execution, as that 
 here contemplated, as arguing a far more imposing 
 solemnity of purpose than is referable to the ordinary 
 course of events. The vast length and majestic 
 character of the approach which leads to the shrine of 
 Christianity is the strongest possible proof of the 
 sanctity of the mysterious edifice itself. If that dis- 
 pensation, then, be authentic, it manifestly is one 
 which implies no trivial routine of moral duty or 
 common-place assent of the heart and understanding 
 • on our part, nor, in fact, any thing which could, in 
 the course of the workings of Divine wisdom, be 
 produced by a less intricate, and, humanly speaking, 
 more natural process. The inference resulting from 
 this last observation is one of vast importance in the 
 discussion of the question, — what the main object of 
 the Gospel is ? because it enaCbles us confidently to 
 pronounce (and that in exact accordance with the 
 most explicit and literal declarations of Scripture) 
 what it is not. Its main end and purport, then, as- 
 suredly, is not any thing which fell within the com- 
 petency of the law of Moses to attain : for, as that 
 law proceeded from the same Divine source, it is self- 
 evident that it would never have been superseded by 
 its Almighty framer, had it contained within itself 
 the means for the effective accomplishment of that 
 result which a revelation from heaven must be pre* 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 163 
 
 sumed to have had in view. " If righteousness could 
 have been by the law," says St. Paul, "then it had 
 not been by laitli." This argument is perfectly un- 
 answerable. It is evident, therefore, that if we would 
 arrive at what must, necessarily, have been the great 
 and foremost purpose of the scheme of Christianity, 
 it must be found, by examining what was the specific 
 point which, notwithstanding the holy source from 
 which it proceeded, was left unaccomplished by the 
 ritual law of Moses. Now that mere morals, and, 
 in addition to what usually passes under that denom- 
 ination, a deep impression of the worship and rever- 
 ence due to the Supreme Being, were inculcated by 
 the Levitical law, almost as fully as in that of Christ 
 himself, is manifest upon the slightest perusal. If we 
 add to the declarations of the Decalogue the numerous 
 beautiful exhortations to acts of mercy and brotherly 
 love, and forgiveness of enemies, which we find inter- 
 spersed through the Jewish code, some specimens of 
 which have already been extracted in the preceding 
 pages, we arrive at a system of duty with reference 
 to God, and of practical morality with regard to man, 
 very little inferior to the most perfect injunctions 
 comprehended in the New Testament. And even 
 though we admit, as in some respects we are bound to 
 do, the inferiority of the former institutes to the latter 
 in that respect, still, at all events, we see no reason 
 why mere moral and devotional precepts, even of the 
 hignest possible perfection, might not, if that were 
 the sole object of the scheme of revelation, have been 
 included in them, without that vast expenditure (if 
 we may venture to use the expression) of continuous 
 miracle which is recorded in the whole series of 
 Scripture, both Jewish and Christian. 
 
 No conclusion, then, can be more certain than that, 
 as there is no superfluity in the workings of Divine 
 wisdom, the Christian dispensation must have com- 
 prised some ulterior object, higher even than that of 
 the instruction of mankind in its most imperative 
 
164 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 principles of duty. But if so, what then was, or 
 what can be imagined to be, that still higher object ? 
 Scripture would answer this question for us, even if 
 the inferences of reason were silent. The Mosaic 
 institutions had confessedly two great ostensible pur- 
 poses in view. Its first and most prominent object 
 was, undoubtedly, the inculcation of holiness, — 
 understanding, by that expression, man's religious 
 submission to the Almighty, and his social morality 
 in the intercourse with his fellow-creatures. On these 
 points the Divine legislator addresses himself with 
 that impressive solemnity and awful purity of idea 
 which might be expected on such a subject, from so 
 august a quarter. But to apprehend our duty is one 
 thing, to perform it, duly and adequately, is another. 
 God may instruct us ; and in such a case the lesson 
 will, assuredly, be worthy of its author : but will man 
 always therefore obey ? This is the really vital point 
 on which every theory of religion, with the exception 
 of that of the Gospel, is found deficient. It is, in a 
 practical sense at least, necessary that offences should 
 come. What, then, is to be the consequence when 
 wretched human nature is the offender, and the 
 angust Maker of the universe the Judge ? With 
 reference, then, to this most perplexing question, the 
 Levitical ritual has a second object, scarcely less 
 elaborately provided for than the first, namely, a 
 system of sacrificial and oblatory expiations, profess- 
 edly intended for the removal of the spiritual conse- 
 quences of offences/springing from the natural cor- 
 ruption and waywardness of the human heart. It is 
 scarcely necessary to observe, that this part of the 
 Divine law entirely failed of its effect, plainly and 
 simply because, from its inherent worthlessness, it was 
 incompetent to accomplish it. It possessed merely 
 the secondary value of a type, and not the primary and 
 inherent efficacy of an antitype. *' It is not possible," 
 says the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, " that 
 the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins/* 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 165 
 
 The same language had been previously held by all 
 the later inspired penmen of the old covenant. And 
 yet, with the exception of this figurative deprecatory 
 rite, what had human infirmity to offer as the requi- 
 site propitiation ? God seems, on this occasion, pur- 
 posely to have called forth, and to have given a 
 momentary sanction to, the utmost of man's limited 
 means of reconciliation, in order that he might more 
 forcibly inculcate the humiliating lesson of its ineffi- 
 ciency, and, by a natural train of thought, eventually 
 lead kis mind onward to some more satisfactory 
 process of expiation. What, then, the law of Moses 
 manifestly, because confessedly, aimed at without 
 success, we may be perfectly certain that it was the 
 foremost object of the Christian dispensation to 
 achieve. It is to the atonement of Christ, there- 
 fore, (that mysterious doctrine so much ridiculed by 
 the professed Infidel, and so insidiously impugned by 
 the semi-Christian, that stumbling-block to the timid 
 rationalist of modern times, as it was to the Jew and 
 to the Gentile of old,) that we must look for the one 
 main and prominent idea which is to give consistency, 
 from first to last, to the whole series of revelation. 
 Without this connecting link, this harmonious con- 
 summation of a long tissue of preparatory contriv- 
 ances, Judaism and Christianity must have been 
 considered rather as rival systems, each laying claim 
 to the same miraculous sanctions, and contesting with 
 one another for the supremacy, than as graduated 
 stages in one vast and comprehensive purpose. Even 
 in this advanced period of the world, the purged and 
 scaled eye of the enlightened Christian moralist can 
 find little to amend in the didactic portions of the 
 Mosaic writings, and, considering them solely in this 
 point of view, would be disposed to place them, side 
 by side, with the moral precepts of the Gospel, as 
 concurrent oracles of the Divine will, both of them, 
 respectively, having a claim to his obedience. But 
 once admit the one preeminent and momentous truth 
 
166 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 here alluded to, as the prominent aim of both the 
 former and the latter dispensations, and immediately 
 all the respective portions of both covenants fall, as 
 it were of their own accord, each into its proper rela- 
 tive position, and, without derogating from the wis- 
 dom of purpose displayed in either, contribute to the 
 symmetry of the whole design. On the other hand, 
 deny the j ustice^ of the inference, and from that mo- 
 ment it is impossible for us to surmise what was that 
 peculiar characteristic of the Gospel scheme which 
 the spirit of early prophecy so eagerly anticipated, 
 and which, in the fulness of time, was so triumph- 
 antly announced to mankind. *' Your Father, Abra- 
 ham," said our blessed Saviour, " rejoiced to see my 
 day; and he saw it, and was glad." What was it, 
 the anticipated sight of which, through a long vista 
 of nearly two thousand years, caused that holy person 
 thus to rejoice ? The communication of a mere law 
 of perfect morality, for the amendment of human 
 manners ? If so, he might have exulted in the antici- 
 pation of the coming of his descendant Moses almost 
 as justly as in that of the more remote Jesus. Was 
 it the revelation of the great doctrine of the soul's 
 immortality ? Setting aside the connexion between 
 the establishment of this doctrine and Christ's expia- 
 tory sacrifice for sin, there seems to be no assignable 
 reason why this important truth should not have been 
 directly communicated by revelation to Abraham 
 himself; and still less can we see why it should not 
 have been inserted among the acknowledged sanc- 
 tions of the Mosaic law. If, then, it was withheld 
 from the prior dispensations, whilst it formed an 
 integral constituent of the latter covenant of the 
 Gospel, the reason must have been, because the Gos- 
 pel contains what the ritual law does not contain. 
 But what was the distinguishing feature of the 
 Christian scheme must be admitted also to have 
 been its foremost purpose. The mysterious pro- 
 pitiation of Christ evidently constitutes the former] 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 167 
 
 we, therefore, reasonably conclude it to have been 
 the latter* 
 
 Nothing, then, surely can be more inconsequential 
 than the reasoning of those persons who, assenting 
 to the general truth of the Holy Scriptures, would 
 cut out from them this their essential and peculiar 
 doctrine. Such inconsistency, however, exists, as we 
 all know, among many professed believers in revela- 
 tion. That it does so exist we can account for only 
 by that unfortunate tendency in mankind to measure 
 the extraordinary agency of Providence, in momentous 
 and extreme cases, by the standard of common occur- 
 rences, and more especially by the want of large and 
 comprehensive views of the general tenor of Scrip- 
 ture ; in other words, by the habit unhappily so preva- 
 lent with a large portion of readers, of selecting from 
 the whole mass of the sacred writings such passages 
 as accord with their own preconceived views, and 
 acknowledging nothing for revealed truth but what, 
 without the aid of revelation, might have been plausi- 
 bly assumed as the probable system of Providence, 
 by the mere effort of unassisted reason. 
 
 The great doctrine, then, of Christ crucified for the 
 sins of the whole world, being the one main proposi- 
 tion which constitutes the essential characteristic of 
 Christianity, it is obvious, that upon a right appre- 
 hension of this fundamental principle must depend 
 the accuracy and soundness of our conclusions, with 
 respect to all the collateral and consequential infer- 
 ences deducible from it. The chief cardinal point 
 being established, the harmonious connexion which 
 combines the whole theory of the Gospel covenant 
 into one consistent whole becomes immediately 
 traceable. This consideration will justify our reca- 
 pitulating, in this place, in some detail, and at the 
 risk of the charge of prolixity, the arguments deduci- 
 ble from reason and from Scripture in its support. 
 
 The books of the Old and of the New Testament 
 then, it may, in the first place, be observed, have 
 
168 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 each their one peculiar and leading idea to establish, 
 which, like the respective portions of a tally, cor- 
 respond with and illustrate each other : that of the 
 former covenant is the fall of man, with all its conse- 
 quences of moral degradation and alienation from 
 God ; that of the latter is the mode adopted by our 
 Maker, for the ultimate correction of human depravity^ 
 and for our final reconciliation with him. Now it 
 has been already laid down, as a preliminary rule, in 
 all theological discussions, that it is perfectly vain, 
 if not impious, in us, where the facts of our moraJ 
 position are palpably and demonstrably certain, to be 
 inventing theories and suggesting modes, by which 
 we conceive that the ends of Providence might have 
 been more cheaply and more expeditiously accom- 
 plished, than by those which we find experimentally 
 to have been adopted. With regard, therefore, ta 
 the continually recurring question, why man was not 
 originally placed, as we have reason to believe that 
 some higher orders of intellectual beings have been 
 placed, in a condition of sufficient moral elevation ta 
 secure him from the risk of forfeiture, and why it has 
 been so arranged that he should previously fall, and 
 be subsequently raised, only at the cost of much 
 painful discipline and hazard, to that very state in 
 which, had God so pleased, he might originally have 
 found himself, our answer is, that questions of this 
 nature are irrelevant to the real object of discussion. 
 A sound theory of religion, we repeat, is not that which 
 lends itself to all the caprices of a fantastic imagination 
 ranging through the vast field of presumed possibili- 
 ties, but which, taking for granted, and stating fairly 
 the undoubted phenomena of our nature, supplies from 
 some adequate, and therefore, as it would seem, 
 necessarily superhuman, source, the information how 
 such a state of things is compatible with the workings 
 of infinite wisdom and goodness. As, then, it were 
 mere captiousness to allege arguments against the 
 probability of the fact of man's first fall from a state 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 169 
 
 of innocence, so long as we are practically certain 
 that at all events our present moral constitution 
 is precisely such as it would be, were that statement 
 demonstrably true, so assuredly it must be equally 
 unreasonable to adduce objections against the doctrine 
 of Christ's atonement, if the unanswerable test of 
 experiment unite with the express assertion of Scrip- 
 ture, in assuring us, that no means of extrication 
 from our present degraded condition ever have been, 
 or in the nature of things appear possible to be, sug- 
 gested, excepting such as have a vicarious expiation 
 for their base. That such is really the case will 
 perhaps appear probable from the following consi- 
 derations. 
 
 In the first place, it may be safely asserted, that 
 the obvious purport of a vast number of passages, 
 both of the Old and New Testament, when taken in 
 their most literal interpretation, suggests the theory 
 of an expiatory atonement for sin, independent, in 
 some degree, of the actual internal merit of human 
 actions; because thus much is confessed by even the 
 most strenuous impugners of this doctrine, who, in 
 other respects, profess to receive the Holy Scriptures 
 as the inspired Word of God. It is on the intrinsic 
 improbability of an arrangement which they assume 
 to be incompatible with the workings of infinite wis- 
 dom, that such persons almost uniformly found their 
 opposition to it ; and, on the strength of that principle, 
 they conceive themselves justified in explaining 
 away, or taking in a metaphorical sense, assertions, 
 the direct inference deducible from which they admit 
 would authorize the assumption of its truth. It 
 cannot, therefore, be considered as begging the ques- 
 tion, if we take the apparently affirmative language 
 of revelation for granted, leaving to our opponents the 
 salvo, if tenable, of considering those expressions as 
 merely figurative, which, unless we are willing to 
 deprive Holy Writ of most of its essential value, and 
 of all its consistency, we conceive must be receired as 
 15 
 
170 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 literal. With this assumption, then, on our part, we 
 would ohserve, that the most hardy opponents of th© 
 doctrine of the atonement, who at the same time 
 profess their belief in a future state of rewards and 
 punishments, must necessarily rest their hostility to 
 it on one or more of the following grounds. Either 
 they must, in the first place, be ready to assert that 
 human nature can maintain that uniform degree of 
 innocence and holiness which Christianity requires,, 
 and which would serve to qualify the soul for a future 
 state of heavenly blessedness, by its own natural 
 powers of perfect obedience to an absolutely perfect 
 law, and thus that it stands in no need of an external 
 expiation : — or, secondly, they must show that re- 
 pentance, when sincere, is a sufficient substitute for 
 the before-mentioned qualities : — or, thirdly, that it 
 is not inconsistent with our notions of a perfect moral 
 and holy Creator to overlook, in some degree,, from 
 his mere grace and free-will, the distinctions between 
 vice and virtue, and to bestow upon the former the 
 rewards which would seem due only to the latter : — 
 or, fourthly, they must be content to suppose a con- 
 gruity between the ultimate destination of mankind 
 hereafter, and their present very imperfect arid sub- 
 ordinate position here : in other words, they must 
 depart from the broad principle of Christian belief, 
 and conceive the heaven, assigned even to the best 
 men in a future state, like the Elysiufti of the poets, 
 to be such merely as the experimentally feeble powers 
 of obedience allotted to our nature would be com- 
 petent to earn. The three former of these proposi- 
 tions, it will be readily observed, are encumbered each 
 with their respective difficulties, as completely re- 
 pugnant to our notions of the Divine attributes as 
 any which can be alleged against that doctrine which 
 they are intended to overthrow : the last of them is, 
 in tact, giving up the question altogether, since, as 
 was just now observed, it is nothing more than the 
 denial of a future state of perfection, such as the Gos- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 171 
 
 pel exhorts us to aspire to, and the substitution in its 
 place of a subordinate existence, little different in 
 character and circumstances from that through which 
 we are now passing. 
 
 Quae gratia cumaum 
 Armonimque fuit vivis, quae cura nitentea 
 Pascere equos, eadem sequitur tellure rejiostoe. 
 
 Now the first of the foregoing suppositions, namely, 
 that perfect obedience, and such a degree of holiness 
 as would qualify for the joys of the heaven revealed 
 in the Scriptures, are really within the reach of man's 
 natural powers to attain, is obviously one which 
 clashes with the uniform experience of mankind in 
 all ages : and even supposing it to be conditionally 
 and possibly true, is, at all events, known to be prac- 
 tically false. The presumed good man of such a 
 creed as that here assumed, would be like the wise 
 man of the Stoics, a mere abstract creature of the 
 imagination, of which we find nothing like a counter- 
 part in the existing order of things. Not only do we 
 find it impossible to point out, either in the records 
 of past history, or within our own times, any one 
 human being whom we should be justified in consider- 
 ing as a perfect specimen of what we ought to be, 
 taking the Christian code of morals as our standard; 
 but, in the next place, even if such a faultless monster 
 could here or there be found, it would still bv no 
 means prove the point in question. It is self-evident, 
 that perfect intrinsic holiness can deserve that appel- 
 lation only when it subsists independently of^ any 
 external help and excitement, and acts entirely by its 
 own free-will, unoperated upon either by the hope of 
 reward or the fear of punishment. But here is at 
 once the assumption of ap impossibility. We know, 
 practically, that the influence of external motives, 
 such as those now alluded to, extends frequently not 
 merely to the pr^evention of any positive overt acts 
 of sin, where the heart is confessedly hardened, but 
 that it also, by habitually checking the first com- 
 
172 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 mencement of evil thoughts, creates within us a feel- 
 ing of innocence to which, in strictness, we can lay 
 no claim. The general conviction that, under the 
 actually existing circumstances which respectively 
 modify every man's power of action, the practical 
 commission of any gross overt act of sin is impossi- 
 ble, is generally quite enough to prevent, during the 
 continuance of that impossibility, the inclination to 
 sin from suggesting itself to the imagination. Pre- 
 cisely as the pressure of the atmosphere, by its action 
 upon the elastic and resisting forces of the compound 
 materials of the globe, keeps them in a state of per- 
 manent inaction, which appears natural to them only 
 because they have no opportunity of displaying the 
 powers of destruction with which they are really 
 invested, so in like manner the hopes and apprehen- 
 sions of religion, the powerful influence of public 
 opinion, and the consequently superinduced restraint 
 of habit, all silently combine to keep in a quiescent state 
 those turbulent passions of the human breast which, 
 were that influence removed, would assuredly break 
 out into impetuous action. The fact of our own 
 innocence, therefore, even when we feel ourselves 
 most justified in pleading it, is but a negative argu- 
 ment at the best. That we are ignorant of ourselves 
 is one of the most trite, because it is one of the most 
 certain, maxims of ethical wisdom. The fact is, that 
 no man knows the real and fearful extent of his own 
 v/eakness till he has been efiectually tried. But it is 
 obvious that in this world a complete trial of the 
 purity and strength of our principles is impossible, 
 because we have no means of acting independently 
 of those many restraints with which Providence has, 
 in its wisdom, surrounded us, and to which even the 
 best men must owe no small portion of their apparent 
 innocence. The more we know of our own nature, 
 by means of the melancholy conviction which is 
 occasionally forced upon us by our own lapses, and 
 the more we acquire the habit of measuring even our 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 173 
 
 best motives by the standard of the eternal rules of 
 Divine morals, the more deeply are we necessarily 
 impressed with the conviction of one inability to 
 attain to any thing deserving the name of positive 
 holiness, by our natural powers. A person in fetters 
 mi^ht as justly boast of his abstaining from acts of 
 violence, as a human being, however innocent he 
 may appear externally, take merit to himself for that 
 •abstinence from guilt which the mercies of his Creator 
 have fortunately put out of his power, and perhaps 
 also, at the same time, refused him the inclination to 
 commit. Now that such a being, the greater part of 
 whose demerits are of a positive, whilst his apparent 
 merits are merely of a negative, character, should 
 aspire, through his exertions, to the, rewards of heaven, 
 appears a palpable absurdity. And yet such is the 
 absurdity maintained by those persons who teach that 
 the whole object of the Christian revelation is the 
 inculcation of a perfect law of morals, our complete 
 obedience to which is to be our passport to the joys 
 of eternity. 
 
 But this self-same argument is open to other, and 
 not less insuperable, objections. If one truth is more 
 certain than another, both from natural reason and 
 the express assertions of Scripture, it is this, that the 
 knowledge of the principles of morality and religion 
 is the cause, because without it we should not possess 
 the capability, of sin. The more perfect, therefore, 
 that knowledge is, provided the original waywardness 
 and perversity of our moral faculties remain unal- 
 tered, the more glaring will be our disobedience, and 
 consequently our guilt, and through that guilt, our 
 eventual responsibility. Need we ask, why we abomi- 
 nate in our fellow-creatures the self-same sanguinary 
 spirit which we pardon in the wild beast of prey ? 
 Wry we spare the mischievous idiot, whilst we punish 
 the deliberate robber and murderer ? This is a dis- 
 dnction which the lowest grade of uncivilized man is 
 pjgpabifi jof making, and the certainty of which the 
 15* 
 
174 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 merest infant can perceive. The natural conscience 
 of mankind requires not to be told that a previous 
 acquaintance with a prohibitory rule, and a convic- 
 tion that that rule which we violate, has a claim to 
 our obedience, is necessary to constitute guilt; in 
 other words, that it is impossible to rebel against 
 authority, of the existence and legitimacy of which we 
 are ignorant. This argument, however, if correct, is 
 at once fatal to the theory of those persons who 
 would inculcate that the promulgation of the Gospel 
 covenant meant nothing more, and, in fact, is nothing 
 more, than the annunciation of a moral law, only 
 rendered more impressive and more binding upou 
 the conscience than any similar codes which have 
 preceded it, in consequence of its having been pro- 
 claimed by Divine authority, and ratified by the opera- 
 tion of miracles. What, it will naturally be asked ia 
 reply, is the benefit accruing to mankind from the 
 revelation of the Divine morality of the Gospel, if, 
 after all, it leaves man in point of practical obedience 
 precisely where it found him ? If, after having shown 
 his incompetency to obey an imperfect law, he finds 
 this elaborate arrangement of Providence only adding 
 to his task, and calling him to the performance of 
 still higher duties than those which have already been 
 found to exceed his strength ? In fact, the hypothesis 
 of the rationalist Christian, as he styles himself, 
 involves so many untenable propositions, that it is 
 perfectly surprising that it should be so confidently 
 urged as it has been, and still is, as a suflScient demon- 
 stration of the unreasonableness of the doctrine of 
 Christ's atonement. That its assertors, in order to 
 accommodate their principles to the declarations of 
 Scripture, are often reduced to the necessity of ex- 
 plaining away and distorting the literal expressions 
 of Holy Writ, they themselves, when urged, cai f)()t 
 but admit. But they plead the paradoxical character 
 attaching, as they conceive, to the notion of a vicari- 
 ous atonement as their justification. Let them, then, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 175 
 
 at least, be candid, and state paradox against paradox. 
 Let them weigh the merits and probability of the 
 theory which they would establish, against that which 
 they would propose to overthrow. So far as the 
 foregoing argument goes, it is clear that their attempt 
 at explanation is more perplexing and contradictory 
 than the original proposition. In reply, therefore, to 
 the arguments of the Socinian, our conclusion is, that 
 we adhere to the great dogma of Christ's expiatory 
 atonement as a necessary superaddition to the mere 
 practical morality of the Gospel ; in the first place, 
 because the admission of that doctrine is more con- 
 sistent with the literal assertions of the inspired books, 
 wherever they occur ; secondly, because it appears to 
 be the one connecting idea which pervades the Jewish 
 no less than the Christian Scriptures ; and, in the 
 third place, because, when fairly stated, it is more 
 satisfactory to our reason, than any rival theory built 
 upon the assumed effectiveness of human merit. We 
 do not, indeed, for a moment intend to assert that the 
 theory, the Divine truth of which we are now vindi- 
 cating, is not itself accompanied with many, and tons 
 inexplicable, difficulties : all that we wish to be under- 
 stood as saying is merely this, that under the present 
 view of the subject, the opposite opinion is per- 
 plexed with far more obvious and more unanswera- 
 able objections. 
 
 We have not, however, yet done with the argu- 
 ment of the Socinian rationalists. Granting that the 
 moral theory of the Gospel affords a rule of life too 
 perfect for human performance, and, consequently, 
 admitting as, at least, a practical truth, that even the 
 holiest individuals will occasionally be found charge- 
 able with the sin of disobedience, still they urge that 
 there are other modes of reconciliation with God, far 
 more consistent with the purity and benevolence of 
 the Divine attributes than that mysterious one which 
 we are now advocating. Sincere repentance, they 
 argue, seems to afford so natural and reasonable a 
 
176 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 satisfaction for sin, as completely to preclude us from 
 supposing that Providence could possibly have adopted 
 so extremely elaborate and painful a process of recon- 
 ciliation as that now supposed, where the same end 
 might at once have been arrived at by far easier, 
 and as it would seem to our limited judgment, less 
 objectionable means. There, is, we readily concede, 
 much plausibility, and, to those who are content to 
 form their permanent opinions from their more ob- 
 vious 'prima facie impressions, we will add, much 
 appearance of probability in this statement : but, at 
 the same time, we are satisfied that, when duly ex- 
 amined, it will be found to be no less untenable and 
 unsatisfactory than the one which we have already 
 discussed in the preceding pages. Without dwelling 
 upon the fact of the probably extreme rarity, we might, 
 perhaps, say impossibility, of any sincere repentance 
 entirely uninfluenced by the fear of future punishment, 
 ^nd such other external motives as would materially 
 deduct from its intrinsic desert ; but allowing their 
 fullest possible value to such sentiments of contrition 
 as our nature in its purest moments may be supposed 
 capable of feeling, still we can trace nothing in such 
 a state of mind which would, in the slightest degree, 
 justify us in cherishing, on that account, such exalted 
 hopes respecting our future destination as the cove- 
 nant of the Gospel warrants in the case of those who 
 teally adopt it as their only means of salvation. The 
 utmost value which can fairly be attributed to repent* 
 ance is^ after all, of a negative, not of a positive, 
 character, it may, perhaps, indeed, should it noj 
 happen through the admixture of human infirmity to 
 be of that equivocal kind which itself requires to be 
 repented of, replace us in a situation equivalent with 
 ihat of the innocence from which we have strayed. 
 But the very nature of the case here appears to draw 
 the boundary line which limits our admission. It 
 may, in the arrangements of the Divine mercy, cancel 
 ,the pcBalties attached to disobedience, aad thus sav« 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 177 
 
 US from punishment ; but under no probable supposi- 
 tion can it elevate itself into actual merit. David, 
 we can readily conceive, ceased, in consequence of 
 the sinceritv of his contrition, to be a murderer and 
 adulterer in the sight of God, but we cannot suppose 
 also that he therefore stood higher in the favour of 
 his Maker than he would have done had he never 
 sinned in that manner at all. The object of a broken 
 and repentant spirit is to solicit an amnesty, not to 
 earn a reward. Its inadequacy, therefore, to serve 
 as a qualification to fit us for sharing the inconceiv- 
 able joys prepared for the souls of just men made 
 perfect, is obvious. For such a qualification, if it 
 exist any where, we must look beyond the limits of 
 human nature, and of mere mortal excellence, for 
 assuredly it is not to be found within that line. But 
 if our appeal must be to external resources, it would 
 be diflfiicult to show in what consists the objection to 
 the doctrine of the expiation for sin purchased by the 
 merits and sufferings of Christ, as taught in the Holy 
 Scriptures ; or rather, it would be difficult to point 
 out any other possible means of reconciliation, which, 
 so far as human reason can venture to judge, would 
 seem so completely adequate to meet the exigency of 
 the case in question. Such, then, appears to be the 
 value of the argument which has been so confidently 
 advanced respecting the sufficiency of repentance 
 alone, as a means of effective righteousness, and for 
 the purpose of withdrawing our hope from him, " who, 
 being made perfect, became the author of salvation 
 unto all them that obey him." 
 
 Let us then pass on to the next assumption, by the 
 aid of which the impugners of the doctrine of the 
 atonement imagine that they can prove that myste- 
 rious arrangement to be an unnecessary, and, there- 
 fore, an improbable dispensation in the workings of 
 Providence. Admitting the defectiveness of all human 
 works on the score of merit, and the inadequacy of 
 mere repentance to do more than to avert the penalties 
 
178 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 of misconduct, still it is asked, may not God, of his 
 own grace and free will, consistently bestow the 
 rewards of heaven upon such portions of mankind, as 
 by the comparative excellence of their conduct may 
 have approached most nearly to the standard of abso- 
 lute perfection ? Why should Divine wisdom prefer 
 the circuitous to the shorter and easier road to his 
 object, where the ultimate destination is in both cases 
 the same ? The first and fittest answer to such an 
 argument is still that which takes shelter in human 
 ignorance, and presumes not to pronounce upon what 
 may, or what may not, be compatible with the views 
 of the Creator of the universe. If, however, we are 
 called upon to reply to this statement of the question, 
 we need not hesitate for a moment in asserting, that 
 all which we can venture to surmise as probable on 
 these mysterious topics must be grounded upon our 
 own experience of the acknowledged order of things, 
 and that, building upon the data supplied by that 
 experience, we conceive the direct presumption in 
 in this case to be in favour of what we may main-f 
 tain to be the palpable scriptural doctrine, If we 
 can assume it as probable, that the Almighty Judge 
 will, in his future award of our eternal allotment, 
 proceed by any other than the inflexible rule of retri- 
 bution, and make our salvation depend rather upon a 
 gratuitous act of amnesty than upon the strict observ- 
 ance of some wisely arranged system, there seems to 
 be no assignable reason why we should have been 
 placed in this world of probation at all : and why, 
 without incurring the risk of possible failure, and 
 without any reference to our moral exertions, we 
 should not at once have had our allotment of heavenly 
 blessedness from the very commencement of our exists 
 ence. Now it is certain that God has not taken this 
 course with us up to the present moment ; it is, there- 
 fore, arguing in the very teeth of positive experience 
 to assume that he will pursue it in his dealings with 
 US hereafter. We are sure, as we are of the fact of 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 179 
 
 our own existence, that he has placed us for the pres- 
 ent in a state of trial. The inference, therefore, is 
 direct, that upon that trial must, in some degree, 
 depend our ultimate destination. And yet the rigor- 
 ous enforcement of a retributive rule would obviously, 
 under the actual degraded circumstances of human 
 nature, be attended with the most fearful result. "If 
 thou. Lord! wilt be extreme to mark what is done 
 amiss, Lord, who may abide it ?" We see no pos- 
 sible escape from this dilemma, excepting in the hope 
 of some auxiliary arrangement, which, whilst it will 
 stamp every deviation from the rule of right with the 
 severest moral reprobation, may in crushing the 
 offence spare the offender. Here again, then, the 
 doctrine of Christ's atonement affords the only seem- 
 ing solution of the difficulty. In asserting thus much, 
 we do not pretend to shut our eyes to the startling 
 impression produced upon our minds by the first 
 exposition of the doctrine of a vicarious sacrifice for 
 sin ; but still we are deliberately convinced, that so 
 far as we can see our way through the maze of con- 
 flicting probabilities and improbabilities, which beset 
 the questions of theology, the adoption of the literal 
 interpretation of Scripture on this occasion as the 
 true one, is the theory which best accords with our 
 most reasonable assumptions respecting the Divine 
 arrangements. 
 
 It has, however, been repeatedly asserted that the 
 doctrine of Christ's atonement cannot possibly be true, 
 because its obvious tendency is to make men more 
 prone to commit sin, in proportion as it removes the 
 apprehension of subsequent punishment. This, un- 
 doubtedly, is a grave charge, and if well founded 
 would be fatal to the notion, that such a dispensation 
 could really proceed from the pure source of Divine 
 holiness. Plausible, however, as this assertion may 
 seem, it scarcely need to be remarked to any person 
 tolerably acquainted with the real tenor of Scripture, 
 and not deriving his opinions at second hand from the 
 
180 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 partial statements of others, how totally remote this 
 allegation is from the real truth. If any one event, 
 among all the mysterious dealings of God's Provi- 
 dence, could more than any other mark his entire and 
 deep abomination of sin, it is that, that he has not 
 thought the personal sufferings of his only begotten Son 
 too high a price to pay for its expiation. Startled as 
 we may be at the awful nature of the sacrifice, there 
 is no escaping from the inference that, granting the 
 reality of the fact, nothing can be more irreconcilable 
 with tlie purity of the Divine mind than acts of wick- 
 edness in his intellectual creatures. If, then, he has 
 adopted this stupendous mode of displaying his ab- 
 horrence of sin, it is evident that the very means 
 which were intended by him to purge away the pol- 
 lution introduced by it cannot, without the most 
 heinous blasphemy, be supposed to operate positively 
 towards its encouragement. The truth, in reality, is 
 entirely on the opposite side. The doctrine of the 
 atonement, to those who apprehend it rightly, so far 
 from relaxing the obligations of morality, is, on the 
 contrary, the source of a great variety of virtues, of 
 which not only would our nature be otherwise inca- 
 pable, but of which it could not even conceive the 
 idea. And to this single fact, that it vastly enlarges 
 our original capability of moral improvement by the 
 holier motives and the sublimer views which it incul- 
 cates, we may confidently appeal, as a proof that it 
 has its foundation in truth ; it being impossible to 
 imagine that the faculties of either the head or the 
 heart could be permanently amended by a supersti- 
 tious fiction, or an impious falsehood. There is cer- 
 tainly no one dogma of revelation so entirely calcu- 
 lated to sober every feeling of arrogance respecting 
 our own deserts; — to sink us in the deepest humilia- 
 tion from the recollection that our sins have all of 
 them respectively had their share in producing the 
 fearful necessity of this great sacrifice ; — to teach us 
 to look with commiseration upon the infirmities of 
 
WIT« HUMAN REASON. 181 
 
 Others, from the recollection that we ourselves are 
 common criminals together with them in the sight 
 of our Maker ; to impress us with a solemn conviction 
 of the duty of extending to the offences committed 
 against our own persons that mercy which we so 
 anxiously implore at the hands of the Almighty ; — 
 and to fill us with the warmest sentiments of grati- 
 tude for the immensity of the Divine goodness dis- 
 played in so remarkable a manner, as this article of 
 our belief which we are in the daily habit of hearing 
 vilified and misrepresented. Let it be observed, 
 moreover, that we may appeal also to one of the 
 most universal and most deep rooted moral instincts 
 of human nature in confirmation of the same doc- 
 trine. The general prevalence even of the grossest 
 abuse of a principle is justly considered by the sound- 
 est philosophers as confirmatory of the existence and 
 of the reasonableness of the principle itself. Now 
 the mortifications of asceticism, which have formed 
 so large a proportion of almost every modification of 
 religion in all ages, from the human sacrifices of the 
 idolatrous Canaanites, and the self-inflictions of the 
 Fakirs and Brahmins of the East, to the purgatorial 
 fires of the Platonists and of the Church of Rome, are 
 all pregnant with proof that the theory of an expiation 
 for sin, under some modification or other, is natural 
 to the mind of man. Once admit that any tendency 
 of the heart and understanding is nearly coextensive 
 with the whole human race, and we may safely lay 
 it down as a general rule, that a theory which asserts 
 the reality of the principle as a legitimate law of 
 Providence, and which only limits the abuse to which, 
 from the weakness of our intellect, it were otherwise 
 prone, is much more likely to be the true one than 
 that which would explain it away altogether. Thus, 
 the very abominations of idolatry, as it is found among 
 the most savage tribes, afford a strong confirmation 
 of the assertion that religion is natural to the human 
 reason ; and the fantastic terrors of superstition are 
 16 
 
182 CONSISTENCY OT KEVELATION 
 
 only a perversion of the great truth, that there is a 
 retributive Being, who vv^ill one day judge the world 
 in righteousness. Why, then, may we not take a 
 lesson from the pertinacious principle of monkery* 
 itself, which assumes that moral guilt can be com- 
 pletely cancelled only by suffering in some shape or 
 other, and admit that it is right in its theory, though 
 it is mischievously wrong in its application? If we 
 will not be content without the why and the wherefore 
 in a»y of our religious opinions, it is not the doctrine 
 
 * Nothing more strongly marks the instinctive pertinacity with which 
 the human mind clings to the theory of the expiation of sin by the means 
 of corporeal inflictions than the fact that the Church of Rome, even while 
 acknowledging the all-suflicient sacrifice of Christ, has thought fit to assert 
 as equally necessary articles of belief the doctrine of purgatory "and that 
 of ascetic mortifications. The following melancholy anecdote, related by 
 Huei, the accomplished Bishop of Avranches, respecting one of his own 
 sisters, affords a singular illustration of the strength of this feeling, and 
 the frightful absurdity and misery to which it may lead when misdirected 
 from its legitimate object : — " Ce fut-ld (au monastei'e de SainteCroix) que 
 cette jeune fille renoncant au monde, se consacra a Dieu, et fut si p6n6ir6e 
 de son amour, que pour se rendre plus agreable d ses yeux, s'abandonnant 
 bien plus a son z61e qu'aux conseils de ses directeurs, elle chercha des 
 mortifications nouvelles ; les pratiques ordinaires ne lui semblant pas 
 remplir toute I'etendiie du desir qu'elle avoit de souffrir pour Dieu ; 
 sachant d'ailleui-s, que des Saints inspires de Dieu avoient pris qiielquefois 
 des routes 6cariees pour s'avancer oans les voiesdu ciel. Ayant ouidire 
 qu'une extreme soif ^toit une des plus grandes peines que la nature pikt 
 supporter, elle r^solut de s'abstenir enti^rement de boire. Pour garder 
 le secret sur C€t Strange dessein, elle renversoit ailroiiement sous la tabte 
 du refectoir la portion de breuvage qu'on lui avoit servie. Cette conduite 
 ne pouvoit pas aller loin, et la nature succomba bientot a une si ten'ible 
 ^preuve; son temperament fut enti^remeut ruin6; toutes les parties dfe 
 son corps furent troublees dans leurs fonctions, et sa peau fut si brfll^e 
 qu'elle devoint noire et sdche comme un parchemin. Les m^ecins A 
 qu'il fallut avoir rocours, ne pouvoient deviner la cause des ^tranges 
 eymptdmes qu'ils remarq\ioiant, et ils ne la connurent que quand la 
 malade fut obligee, par I'autorit^ de ses sun^ri^urs, et par les devoirs de 
 ea conscience, de leur decouvrir le mystere. Mais elle le d^couvrit, 
 lorsque le mal 6toitsans remede, et i)eu de jours avant sa mort. Ce fut 
 alorsqu'en rendant comptede sa conduite et de ses mortifications, elle dit 
 qu'un jour dans la cruelle alteration qu'elle sentoit, voyant un jwrceau se 
 vautrer dans la boue, et avaler a pleine gorge I'eau mel^e avec la fange, 
 elle lui portoit envie, etsouhaitoit de pouvoir prendre part a cette boisi-on. 
 Dieu avoit doue cette sainte fille de rares talens. Elle avoit un esprit 
 transcendant, <kc." Ought we not to cherish with respect and gratitude 
 a doctrine of our faith which gives to these powerful and natural feelings 
 their proper direction, and erects into the sublimest devotional fervour of a 
 p,raiefiil and humble heart principles which, under the operation of au 
 ill-regulaied judgment, would lead only to misery and degradation? 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 183 
 
 of Christ's atonement only which will be erased from 
 our rule of faith ; but every article of our belief, not 
 excepting those of natural religion itself, will succes- 
 sively disappear, till the whole superficies of our moral 
 character will, eventually, become one entire blank. 
 The more, then, we examine this first and main pro- 
 position of Christianity, the more deeply shall we find 
 Its roots to be fixed, not merely in the obvious phrase- 
 ology, of the sacred writings, and in the general con- 
 sistency of revelation with itself, but in the wants, 
 and tendencies, and instinctive aspirations of our 
 whole spiritual constitution. We find it to be accord- 
 ant with our nature in its present position, and the 
 inference is inevitable, that it forms an integral por- 
 tion of the arrangements of Providence, however 
 inadequate our understanding maybe to discover why 
 such was the peculiar mode by which our Creator 
 thought fit to work out the eventual happiness of his 
 creatures. 
 
 Finally, it maybe observed that this fundamental 
 dogma of the Christian dispensation exactly tallies 
 and harmonizes with what we read, as having con- 
 stituted the first recorded event of revealed religion in 
 the Old Testament : namely, the corruption of the 
 whole human race by the sin of Adam. If there is 
 any thing repugnant to our moral notions in the idea 
 of the communication of sin from one individual to 
 many, and such must be admitted to be the first 
 impression conveyed by a hasty glance upon this 
 mysterious topic, it at least affords some solution of 
 our perplexity, if we are bound, also, by the self-same 
 authority, to admit that a parallel course of arrange- 
 ment which permitted the introduction of the disease, 
 contrived by an exactly similar process to accomplish 
 the cure. If we grant the truth of the former of these 
 recorded events, it seems impossible to withhold our 
 assent as to the reality_of the latter. And such is the 
 view taken of the subject by St. Paul in his Epistle 
 to the Romans, wher^ he cogently argues that if the 
 
184 CONSISTENCY OF EEVELATION 
 
 methods of the Divine government could allow sin 
 and death to spread over the v^hole human race 
 through the disobedience of one, much more may we 
 be assured that it cannot be incompatible with the 
 dispensations of the merciful Father of the human 
 race to permit a coextensive system of reconciliation 
 to be communicated to mankind through the imputed 
 righteousness of one. 
 
 CHAPTER XTX. 
 
 Of the Divinity of Christ. 
 
 The doctrine of the divinity of our blessed Saviour 
 appears naturally, even were the express affirmatory 
 declarations of Scripture out of the question, to grow 
 out of that of his satisfactory atonement for the sins 
 of mankind . Without presuming to speculate largely 
 upon the internal probability of these transcendental 
 problems, we may, perhaps, with all humility, venture 
 to observe thus much; that granting the reality of 
 that expiatory sacrifice, there would seem to be some* 
 thing less inconsistent with our first natural impres- 
 sions, in the idea of the Deity, himself submitting^ 
 from a principle of mercy, to pay a penalty for the sins 
 of mankind in his own person, than in that of his 
 subjecting one of his own innocent creatures to pun- 
 ishment for the sake of other creatures confessedly 
 guilty. It also seems difficult to imagine that the 
 expiation afforded by any finite being could be so 
 extensive in its effects as that of Christ is stated by 
 revelation to be. Arguments, indeed, of this descrip- 
 tion ill become the spirit of diffidence with which it 
 behoves creatures like ourselves to approach to the 
 contemplation of thcAvritings of infinity. They are, 
 therefore, adduced in this place solely and merely for 
 the purpose, not of throwing light upon what is coii* 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 185 
 
 fessedly inexplicable, but of meeting the conflicting 
 assertions of those, who, building their arguments 
 upon the presumed conclusions of their own intellect, 
 have assailed the doctrine of Christ's divinity as too 
 palpably improbable to be admitted by rational beings 
 under tlie guarantee of any external testimony what- 
 ever. Our wish is only to balance assumption against 
 assumption, and to repel the self-complacent opinion 
 of the followers of Socinus, that, however the letter 
 of Scripture maybe against them, its spirit and sound 
 reason are for them. Within these limits, and on 
 this defensive principle exclusively, can these high 
 topics afford matter for justifiable discussion. The 
 real appeal of every mind, duly sensible of its own 
 weakness, must, after all, be to what it finds expressly 
 written ; and we have no hesitation in asserting, that 
 we do find the doctrine now alluded to stated in holy 
 writ, with a decision and clearness of expression, 
 which, if we admit the authenticity of the various 
 passages in which it occurs, is at once decisive of the 
 fact in question. 
 
 CHAPTER XX. 
 
 Of Sanctijication by the Holy Spirit. 
 
 When Scripture inculcates the necessity of the 
 sanctification of the human soul, by the strengthen- 
 ing aid of the Holy Spirit, it adds another harmoni- 
 zing and consistent truth to the great and concurrent 
 doctrine of Christ's atonement. It has already been 
 observed, that, although our Redeemer came to recon- 
 cile God toman by annulling the penalties otherwise 
 consequent upon the inevitable infirmities of our 
 nature, it were to derive a blasphemous conclusion 
 from that doctrine, were we to assert that its practical 
 effect could possibly be that of relaxing prospectively 
 16* 
 
j.86 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 the obligations of morality, or of rendering sin lesa 
 offensive to the Divine nature than it had previously 
 been. On the contrary, nothing, as we have shown, 
 could more completely demonstrate the imperative 
 duty imposed upon us of pursuing all attainable holi- 
 ness by every possible means, than the tremendous 
 cost which revelation teaches us has already been 
 incurred in consequence of man's past disobedience. 
 Rightly considered, then, the satisfaction afforded to 
 the inflexible principle of moral retribution, by the 
 expiatory merits of Christ, is one solemn obligation 
 tlie more to a course of undeviating obedience. But 
 if the corruption of the human heart continues after 
 the promulgation of the Gospel covenant precisely 
 what it was before that important epoch, the subse- 
 quent history of mankind Avould probably be little 
 more than that of a repetition of the same follies ancj 
 crimes which have already spread such extensive 
 devastation over the works of the Creator, The same 
 causes would naturally produce the same effects ; and, 
 therefore, whatever might be believed of the future 
 destination of man in another life, as a consequence 
 of the disarming of the Divine justice, his moral 
 character in this world would seem to derive little 
 apparent benefit from the institution of a purer code 
 of morality than that which he has already so auda- 
 ciously violated. Now the provision which Scripture 
 assures us has through the medium of the Gospel 
 dispensation, been made for us in this point, namely, 
 with reference to the actual improvement of our 
 spiritual nature in this world, appears exactly calcu-^ 
 laied to meet this difficulty. The nearer any practi- 
 cal rule of life approaches toward the standard of per- 
 fection, the greater will, of course, be the degree of 
 moral exertion and self-possession necessary for the 
 accomplishment of the task which it imposes. The 
 provisions made for us by revelation here again are 
 remarkable for their admirable adaption to the wants 
 of our nature. In the Old Testament, and in the books 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 187 
 
 of the Levitical law more especially, we find little 
 allusion to any other mode of justification than that of 
 ritual observances; and with regard to the sanctifica- 
 tion of the soul, in like manner the natural strength 
 of the human heart seems to be not unfrequently 
 appealed to, as possessing, within itself, the means of 
 obedience. In proportion, indeed, as the Jewish 
 Scriptures draw towards their close, the principles 
 which they inculcate gradually assume, in all respects, 
 a more evangelical character. Other and better expia- 
 tions than those prescribed by Moses begin to be anti- 
 cipated, and the accompanying Christian doctrine, of 
 the assistance afforded to the active powers of man 
 by the Divine grace, to be more prominently asserted. 
 The full and complete developement of this latter 
 doctrine, however, like the former one of the atone- 
 ment of Christ, is reserved for the Gospel dispensation 
 to inculcate. When, accordingly, we turn from the 
 Old to the New Testament, we there find the almost 
 entire moral helplessness of our nature laid down, 
 from first to last as a fundamental maxim. The 
 reward of our obedience, and the means of our obe- 
 dience, are both described as the unbought gift of 
 God. These are the two concurrent truths upon which 
 the whole structure of Christianity is built. The very 
 best actions of which we are capable have all of them 
 a taint of sin, and, therefore, in all we do, we stand in 
 need of an atonement to make our imperfect actions 
 acceptable with our Maker: — the thoughts of our 
 hearts are far gone from righteousness, and accord- 
 ingly we cannot elevate them to spiritual things, we 
 cannot apprehend nor love the new duties we are 
 called upon to perform, but through the co-operating 
 Divine assistance. It is thus that the ruling principle 
 of the Gospel is the direct reverse of that which 
 formed the basis of heathen, and in great measure of 
 Jewish virtue. The highest notions of moral excel- 
 lence entertained by the philosophers of Greece and 
 Kom^ were those of human nature pondering with 
 
188 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 haughty self-complacence upon its own comparative 
 refinement, and looking proudly down upon the herd 
 of common beings still immersed in the follies and 
 vices of ignorance. The virtue of the good man of 
 the Old Testament is not, indeed, of this offensively 
 proud character, yet even there we occasionally meet 
 with an assumption of merit by individuals, which, 
 however accordant with the then acknowledged 
 standard of excellence, forms an unseemly contrast 
 with the meek principles of the religion of Christ. 
 Of this latter dispensation, unmixed humility is the 
 great, it may almost be said to be the only, rule of 
 conduct. " Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is 
 the kingdom of heaven." Such were the words with 
 which our Redeemer opened his commission, and to 
 the same purport was his final parting valediction. 
 It is manifest, then, that any claim advanced by 
 human beings on the score of actual desert to the 
 approbation of the Deity and the joys of heaven are 
 at complete variance with the Christian system. The 
 area of duty which is committed to the superintend- 
 ence of each of us by the sublime code of evangeli- 
 cal morals is confessedly larger than our scanty pow- 
 ers can occupy. In this state of original helplessness, 
 accordingly, one resource only remains open to us: 
 to throw ourselves, with all our infirmities, upon the 
 Divine help. To supplicate our Maker that he will, 
 in his mercy, enable us to do that which from our own 
 natural powers we are unable to perform. This is 
 what the dictates of plain reason would tell us is the 
 proper course to be pursued ; it is also what the Gos- 
 pel expressly urges us to do, whilst, at the same time, 
 it assures us, that they who ask for the aid of God's 
 strengthening Spirit shall never ask in vain. It is 
 thus, that in the spiritual world revealed to us by the 
 Gospel, precisely as in the natural world, the further 
 and the closer we examine, the more palpably we find 
 God to be all in all. Our first glance at the works of 
 the creation presents to us the idea of a series of 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 189 
 
 efficient secondary causes all working by their own 
 agency their respective results. As we advance fur- 
 ther we find the existence of those presumed causes 
 inadequate to account for the stupendous results 
 which we had attributed to them, and are compelled 
 to acknowledge the finger of the Creator as the main 
 directing principle. So likewise in the contemplation 
 of the astounding problems of theology, in proportion 
 as our knowledge of the arrangements of Providence 
 dilates, our sense of our own importance dwindles, 
 till it shrinks actually into nothing. In every thing, 
 in our seeming strength no less than in our weakness, 
 we feel the necessity of the Divine support. 
 
 Now, it is self-evident, that if by the natural pow- 
 ers of the understanding we could work our way from 
 the first and simplest up to the highest and most 
 abstruse principles of religious morality, this conclu- 
 sion, which is precisely that of Christianity, the dis- 
 covery of this golden chain, which in all things con- 
 nects man indissolubly with his Maker, is what we 
 should eventually arrive at. We know, indeed, ex- 
 perimentally, that these truths are placed too high 
 for human attainment by the mere natural powers of 
 the intellect, because we know that their first disco- 
 very was contemporaneous with the promulgation of 
 Christianity: but still, looking back upon them as 
 matters of revelation, we cannot but perceive their 
 entire consistency, and feel that they are the points 
 where intellectual research ought in its happiest and 
 most illuminated moments to terminate. It is then, 
 assuredly, no small proof of the internal probability 
 of the truth of the Christian system, that the main 
 propositions which it asserts are those to which the 
 highest moral research would lead us ; and that the 
 helps which it pledges itself to supply are exactly 
 those which our spiritual wants and weaknesses 
 would most earnestly demand. We cannot perform 
 a perfect and spotless action if we would ; we, there- 
 fore, want a Redeemer : — we cannot detach our 
 
190 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 thoughts from the ahsorhing influence of wordly mat- 
 ters and fix them steadily upon heavenly objects by 
 any natural power that we possess ; and we, therefore, 
 stand equally in need of assisting Grace. 
 
 Both these objects the Gospel declares it to be its 
 special purpose to obtain for us. How far it has 
 redeemed its pledge, with regard to the former, must 
 ever in this life be a mere matter of faith, building its 
 conclusions upon what we conceive to be the certainty 
 of the Divine promises, the reasonableness of the 
 object, and our urgent need of it. But of the latter, 
 if founded in truth, we ought to have experimental 
 proof in this life ; because the gifts of the Spirit, if 
 real, ought to have a perceptible influence on our con- 
 duct, and to place a visible and plain mark of distinc- 
 tion between those whom Scripture designates as the 
 children of this world, and those to whom it gives 
 the appellation of children of light. Does, then, 
 positive experience serve to confirm this undoubted 
 doctrine of revelation ? Do we find that our moral 
 nature undergoes a change for the better, in propor- 
 tion as we approximate by faith towards the terms of 
 acceptance held forth to us by the Gospel covenant ? 
 If it does, then there ought to be a decided difference 
 not merely between the external actions, but more 
 especially in the whole cast of mind and of sentiment 
 of the one party and the other. Such, undoubtedly, 
 ought to be, and such, there can be little doubt, is 
 actually the case. At the same time it must be 
 conceded, that the question does not admit of that full 
 clearness of proof of which it mi^ht at first sight be 
 deemed capable. Natural morality, we must recol- 
 lect, forms an integral portion of Christianity itself; 
 but a man, we know, may admit the inferences and 
 defer to the authority of the former, whilst he rdects 
 the latter. He may, therefore, be capable of perform- 
 ing actions which even to the most enlightened Chris- 
 tian may appear externally good, and even with respect 
 ID their internal character may, in a certain sense, 
 
WITH HUMAN RFlASON. 191 
 
 be admitted to be such ; that is to say, in such a degree 
 at least as the inferior and defective motives from 
 which they proceed may justify our applying to them 
 that appellation . The purest Christian motives again 
 (on which the character of our actions must totally 
 depend) may not be, and in fact never are, always 
 equally influential in the conduct of the same indi- 
 vidual at all times; whilst, also, they may not always, 
 even when most sincere, be accompanied by an uner- 
 ring judgment, or that delicacy of tact which recom- 
 mends our conduct to the approbation of society. The 
 most sincere servant of Christ may be ignorant, timid, 
 fearful, and superstitious ; he may have to sustain 
 internal struggles which can never reach the eye of 
 the external observer, and which if laid open to the 
 apprehension of others would only provoke a smile 
 of pity or contempt. Most assuredly it is not for the 
 gross perceptions of worldly men to judge how much 
 of what is substantially estimable and heroic, in the 
 best sense of the term, may be disguised in this homely 
 and repulsive attire, and the due appreciation of 
 which must be reserved for the equitable and infalli- 
 ble tribunal of omniscience. Certain, at all events, 
 it is, that whilst outward appearances remain the 
 same, or even whilst the scale of merit may sometimes 
 appear to preponderate in favour of the less decidedly 
 religious character, the view taken by our Maker, 
 with whom the purity of the heart is all in all, and 
 xne glitter of the intellect as nothing, may be directly 
 the reverse of the world's judgment. 
 
 Still, however, though the mingling shades of 
 character, and the unequal distribution of those gifts 
 which recommend man lo society, may render it often 
 difficult, and sometimes impossible for us to recognise 
 the express workings of the Christian spirit, as dis- 
 tinguished from those of the natural and strictly human 
 propensities, we may confidently appeal to the broad 
 and palpable phenomena which distinguish the sin- 
 cere followers of Christ from the mere men of this 
 
192 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 world, that the difference between them is not ima* 
 ginary, but permanent and real. The whole moral 
 value of human actions depending upon motives, and 
 it being the great practical object of Christianity to 
 supersede almost all those of our original nature, and 
 to substitute in their room others of a higher character, 
 it is obvious that the responsible being in whom this 
 change is wrought must, so far as his relative position 
 with respect to his Maker is taken into consideration, 
 be, in almost the literal interpretation of the words, 
 a new creature. His intellectual vision will be turned 
 in a completely opposite direction from that of the 
 persons whose standard of conduct is derived solely 
 from the perishable things of this life. The same 
 objects, consequently, as contemplated by them seve- 
 rally from different points of view, will appear to hira 
 and to them in extremely different proportions. Each 
 of them reasoning accurately from their respective 
 premises, will come to completely contrary conclu- 
 sions, with respect to the intrinsic value and the com- 
 parative innocence of their several pursuits. Sin, 
 which to the coarse and hackneyed feelings of the 
 worldly man appears a necessary part of his nature, 
 with which it is vain to struggle, and which he deems, ' 
 after all, as below the dignity of Almighty wisdom 
 to regard or to punish, is to the quick and susceptible 
 touch of the spiritually-minded a pollution which can 
 be purged away only by the most solemn expiation* 
 He recollects the fearful derangement which it has 
 already occasioned in the works of Providence, and 
 the immense ransom which it has already cost ; and 
 whilst he feels his weakness and his continually 
 recurring propensity to it, as continually perseveres 
 to pray for support against it. His feelings, accord* 
 ingly, when they occur, for occur occasionally they 
 will, become, in a certain sense, rather infirmi- 
 ties than sins. He remembers that they who are 
 born of God commit no wilful sin whatever, and if 
 a hasty display of petulance, a selfish or impure 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 193 
 
 thought escape for a moment from him, the humilia- 
 tion of his feelings and the increased energy with 
 which he supplicates for afresh portion of the Divine 
 support, sufficiently vouch for the heavenward pro- 
 gress which he is making. It is easy, no doubt, to 
 turn all these nice perceptions into ridicule, and to 
 ask, even admitting their reality, of what advantage 
 they are to ourselves or to society. To the mere 
 utilitarian of this world, who conceives that the exclu- 
 sive object of the stupendous scheme of the universe 
 is the production of a few personal comforts, and who 
 considers the soul as intended to cater for the body, 
 and not the body as an instrument given to the soul 
 for the exercise and developement of its noblest facul- 
 ties, such an objection as the foregoing will appear 
 decisive. But to the person whose mind is sufficiently 
 enlarged to take in all the known and all the probable 
 circumstances of our compound nature, such views 
 will appear any thing rather than trifling or super- 
 stitious. It is true that human life, when consi- 
 dered under the most encouraging aspect, presents us 
 only with the view of a hardly contested and half- 
 earned victory over the principle of corruption ; but, 
 then, this very imperfect success is in itself, if rightly 
 considered, a pledge affi)rded to us by Providence 
 that the allotment of the Christian is not confined to 
 what we see of him here. If those moral exertions, 
 to which the internal voice of conscience most elo- 
 quently responds, are unproductive of any substantial 
 fruit in this world, we can scarcely want a stronger 
 proof that what is so evidently an essential part of 
 our nature must be destined to find its due place and 
 correspondent allotment in another. Scripture tells 
 us that this life is a state of moral trial. It is quite 
 impossible to imagine any combination of circum- 
 stances better calculated for the promotion of that 
 end, if such be really its object. Were this world 
 all in all, we might naturally expect of our Maker 
 that the faculties with which we are endued should 
 17 
 
194 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 be exactly adequate for the accomplishment of th^ 
 work which it would then be our sole duty to per- 
 form. There would be a nicely balanced proportion 
 observed between our appointed business and the 
 machinery of our allotted powers. But a spiritual 
 probation, such as that which the Gospel scheme 
 supposes, in order to be complete for the accomplish- 
 ment of the whole of its purpose, requires that we 
 should be tasked beyond our strength, because with- 
 out such a demand upon us the full and entire whole 
 of what we can really achieve could never be called 
 into action. But this excess of trial beyond our 
 natural means of performance, almost presupposes, 
 in the case of a merciful and just Ruler of the Uni^ 
 verse, the existence of such external and occasional 
 help as, whilst it would secure to us the full benefit 
 of the moral exercise, would at the same time inters 
 fere at the proper season, and prevent that which is 
 intended as a benefit from becoming an injury ; pre- 
 cisely as a kind and intelligent parent, whilst he' 
 encourages his children to the full exercise of their 
 strength, assists them at the moment when he sees 
 that they really stand in need of his interference. 
 
 The foregoing view of the question, then, may be 
 simply stated thus : — The acknowledged object of 
 our existence in this world being that of a spiritual 
 probation, and that probation being brought into full 
 action by the imposition of a task far exceeding our 
 natural powers of performance, the doctrines of 
 justification and of sanctification, the former by art 
 external expiation for sin, the latter by the commu- 
 nication of spiritual aid, to those who earnestly seek 
 for it by prayer, for the completion of their appointed 
 task, appear to be necessary inferences from that pri- 
 mary admission. God having, in his wisdom, endued 
 us with very imperfect capabilities of obedience, calls 
 us, notwithstanding, to regulate our lives by an 
 actualljr perfect rule of duty. The utmost which w^e 
 can do is, after all, to fall far short of the standard at 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 195 
 
 which we aim; but we confidently believe, mean- 
 while, that the Divine arm is stretched out to assist 
 and lead us forward ; and although the closing scene 
 of our career is hid from our view, the inference 
 appears certain, that what is thus wisely begun will 
 be as wisely ended. The same admitted imperfection 
 of our nature exposes us not only to the negative 
 defect of failure, but also, as is too obvious, to the 
 positive one of occasional sin : here, again, the same 
 merciful Providence interferes, and pays for us, under 
 the stipulation of an express covenant, which we are 
 competent to accept or to decline, the price of those 
 aberrations which, though referrible, in great mea- 
 sure, to our own depravity, may, in a certain degree, 
 appear to follow necessarily from the inherent cor- 
 ruption of our minds. Now it is evident that this, if 
 rightly understood, is any thing rather than what it 
 has been asserted to be, an indolent system, encou- 
 raging us to throw equally our moral^ exertions and 
 the responsibility of our sins upon our Maker. On 
 the contrary, as we cannot without the grossest 
 impiety, accede to the inference of the Antinomian, 
 who, on the plea of the infinite operation of Christ's 
 atonement, argues that he may now offend with 
 impunity, thus making the most stupendous proof of 
 the deadliness of sin an encouragement for its 
 renewed commission; so we shall be reasoning as 
 falsely and profanely, if we derive from the scriptural 
 doctrine of cooperating grace the inference, that we 
 may safely suspend our own efforts, and trust for the 
 accomplishment of our task to the predominating and 
 irresistible influence of the Divine Spirit. Here, 
 indeed, we tread upon the verge of a nice and inter- 
 minable point of theological metaphysics, which it is 
 safer to decline touching upon than to discuss. The 
 question respecting the liberty of human actions is a 
 practical one, which we cannot mistake if we follow, 
 to the best of our power, the instinctive guidance of 
 our holiest impulses, however we may be perplexed 
 
196 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 whilst viewing it as a philosophical problem. That 
 the obvious purport of Scripture with reference to 
 this mysterious topic, accords with our own internal 
 consciousness, and, whether we really are, or are not, 
 essentially free agents, at all events calls upon us to 
 act as though we were such, cannot be doubted. In 
 fact, the arguments generally alleged in support of 
 the doctrine of necessity, though often advocated by 
 sincerely pious and amiable men, are all of them 
 liable to the same objections which, at an early- 
 period of these observations, we have stated to attach 
 to the plausible but unsubstantial theories of infidelity ; 
 that is to say, they turn away our attention from 
 what we know experimentally of the arrangements 
 of Divine Providence, and rest their proofs upon a 
 priori assumption only ; a mode of discussion which, 
 however plausible, it is scarcely necessary to remark, 
 is almost always delusive and unsubstantial. 
 
 Without, then, attempting to enter upon the ex- 
 amination of the conflicting opinions respecting neces- 
 sity and free-will, we will merely venture to observe, 
 that if we will take into consideration the moral 
 purpose, which, so far as we can judge from the 
 general context of revelation, it is the object of the 
 operation of Divine grace to accomplish upon the 
 human heart, we cannot but suppose that the degree 
 of spiritual aid which it affords will necessarily be 
 such as would be compatible, in all respects, with the 
 full liberty of human actions : in other words, it will 
 be a cooperating and concurrent help, not a pre- 
 dominating and overpowering influence. We do not 
 pretend to shut our eyes to the apparent force of the 
 objections which maybe alleged on the opposite side. 
 It is, we know, confidently urged by the advocates of 
 necessity, that, as it is derogatory to the admitted 
 attributes of the Deity, that his interference with 
 human actions should be supposed capable of being 
 resisted by finite beings like ourselves, the admission 
 of the reality of such interference is necessarily 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 197 
 
 destructive of the doctrine of man's free agency. 
 Plausible as this objection is, if considered as an 
 abstract proposition, we conceive that it stands in 
 need of no other refutation than that of a practical 
 appeal to every circumstance and phenomenon of the 
 creation which surrounds us. The argument upon 
 which it rests is, in fact, nothing more than an 
 assumption of the principle that all the works of 
 infinity are necessarily themselves infinite; a sup- 
 position which, if true, would be a virtual denial of 
 the liberty of the Divine Being himself, as it is also 
 obviously incompatible with the fact of the existence 
 of the graduated scale of subordinate creatures, which 
 we recognise in every direction, through the works 
 of Providence. God, we know, has distributed their 
 several faculties to the different races of animals pre- 
 cisely in the proportion in which they are wanted for 
 their defence and support, subjecting each several 
 gift to its peculiar modification, and withholding 
 those which are unnecessary. Why, then, if the 
 limitation of his own omnipotence is one of the most 
 prominent phenomena which characterize his crea- 
 tion, must we necessarily assume that the gift of his 
 assisting grace, the acknowledged object of which is 
 to render man capable of eflective righteousness, can, 
 in fact, be imparted in such overwhelming propor- 
 tions only as, by destroying that free agency which 
 is the very basis of morality, would render all real 
 righteousness impossible ? It is absurd, we are told, 
 to imagine that man can cooperate with his Maker in 
 the production of any given purpose. We own that 
 we do not see this absurdity, provided there is no 
 implied impossibility in the idea that it may have 
 been the will of our Creator to endow us with the 
 faculty of free agency. It is true, indeed, that that 
 very faculty itself must, under every view of the 
 subject, be admitted to depend upon the Divine per- 
 mi^ision for its continuance; but this admission 
 detracts nothing from the substantial reality of the 
 17* 
 
198 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 gift, when once communicated. To deny that the 
 Almighty can annex liberty of will and action to his 
 creatures, is in fact subjecting him to the same 
 shackles of necessity which we are striving to im- 
 pose upon ourselves; if, on the other hand, we admit 
 that he can do so, the self-same inference which 
 establishes the fact of his omnipotence and moral 
 attributes is equally substantiative of our own rela- 
 tive dependence upon him as accountable beings. 
 That the control of our actions is in some degree, at 
 least, placed within our own power, our instinctive 
 apprehensions and belief, with the otherwise inexpli- 
 cable phenomena of an applauding or reproving con- 
 science, we repeat, unite with the whole tenor of 
 Scripture in uniformly asserting. To such cogency 
 of proof on the one side, it would seem perfectly 
 nugatory to oppose a mere metaphysical and equivo- 
 cal axiom on the other ; and yet it is on this single 
 substratum that a system of theology has been 
 erected, subversive, as at first sight it would nppear, 
 of almost all the great principles of Christianity, and 
 which probably has failed of producing very exten- 
 sive evil only from the fact that its advocates have 
 frequently counteracted by the exemplary holiness 
 of their lives the pernicious tendency of their doc- 
 trines. It is painful to speak in these terms of dis- 
 paragement of the tenets of a large body of Christians 
 whose mistakes, for such we believe them to be, are 
 at all events frequently accompanied by so much 
 warmth and rectitude of principle, and are the 
 result of an exaggerated statement, the consequence 
 of a deep conscientious impression, of a most 
 momentous truth, rather than of any unworthy 
 motive. As a system of belief, however, we cannot, 
 and ought not, to conceal our opinion that it is not 
 accordant with what we read in Scripture, and what 
 our instinctive moral sense, that witness of God 
 within our own hearts, would inculcate. At the 
 same time, we readily admit, that if erroneous, it is 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 199 
 
 far less so than that opposite extreme which, hy 
 attempting to elevate unduly the moral faculties of 
 man, would teach him to look Tor salvation to the 
 merit of his own works, and to disclaim that reli- 
 ance upon the Divine aid which can alone expiate 
 our infirmities, and conduct us to effectual holiness. 
 
 CHAPTER XXI. 
 
 Of the practical Tendency of the Morality of the Gospel, and of the 
 extraordinary Gifts of t/ie Holy Spirit. 
 
 If then the preceding remarks are correct, the 
 Christian covenant is, of all the schemes of theology 
 and ethics which have ever been laid open to the ap- 
 prehension of mankind, that which tends to elevate our 
 nature the most, and to promote most largely a course 
 of pure and energetic action in its followers, whilst at 
 the same time, by a singularly uniform and pervading 
 analogy, it harmonizes with all that the best human 
 philosophy can infer respecting the presumed arrange- 
 ments of Providence. By the substitution of a vica- 
 rious atonement for sin, it may seem calculated at 
 the first glance to encourage laxity of morals, and by 
 the necessity of external spiritual aid which it asserts, 
 it may appear to have a tendency to paralyze our own 
 personal efibrts, but, in proportion as we examine it 
 more and more nearly, these objections not only 
 entirely disappear, but its real practical tendency ap- 
 pears to be directly the reverse of what we might 
 have hastily supposed. Whilst referring all things 
 to the free grace, and mercy, and purity of God, it 
 promotes, to a degree perfectly unexampled under 
 any other modification of belief, holiness of heart 
 and action in men. Fervent, practical righteous- 
 ness ; righteousness which in its reverential service 
 of our Maker is perfectly analogous with those feel- 
 ings of kindliness required of us toward our neigh- 
 
200 CONSISTENCY OF KEVELATION 
 
 hour ; righteousness which, from a deep conviction 
 of humility and gratitude, looks firmly and cheer- 
 fully and submissively to the protection of a wise 
 and bounteous Providence, hoping all things, endur- 
 ing all things, and believing all things, is its great 
 aim and object. When that object is obtained (and 
 completely obtained it is not until the great twin 
 doctrines of justification and sanctification, as re- 
 vealed by Scripture, have become part and parcel of 
 our habitual impressions and given a decided charac- 
 ter to our minds,) human nature may be truly said to 
 have arrived at the highest possible moral elevation 
 of Avhich in this world it is capable. The refinements 
 of science may add much to its external appearance 
 in the intercourse of society, as they may add also to 
 the utility and individual comfort of their respective 
 possessors. But on these points God, we are 
 assured, sees not as man sees. Such accessory 
 qualities are after all, where the main tendency of 
 the mind is right, rather a superaddition of incidental 
 worldly advantage than indispensable constituents 
 of that class of blessings Avhich it is our primary 
 duty to aspire to. The first appeal of Christianity is 
 to our spiritual and moral feelings, because in pro- 
 portion as these are duly cultivated the faculties of 
 the understanding acquire their relative degree of 
 usefulness. This subjection of merely intellectual 
 to moral excellence, which is so offensive to the 
 vanity of men of this world as to account for no 
 small degree of the petulance with which they 
 regard revelation, is traceable from first to last 
 through the whole tenor of Scripture. That it indeed 
 in right reason ought to be so, is suflfiiciently obvious; 
 nor should we have deemed it necessary to make the 
 remark in this place, did it not serve to account for 
 what at first sight seems paradoxical in some portions 
 of the sacred writings, with reference to the preter- 
 natural gifts of the Holy Spirit alluded to in the books 
 both of the Old and of the New Testament. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 201 
 
 We are so apt to be struck with the splendour, and 
 consequent appearance of partial favour in the sight 
 of God, attaching to the miraculous powers of pro- 
 phecy and language distributed to individuals on 
 peculiar and remarkable occasions, that we feel dis- 
 posed to undervalue as inferior in* importance those 
 graces which, as instruments of salvation, are essen- 
 tial, and have, therefore, been made accessible to the 
 whole Christian world. Hence it is that in every 
 period of religious agitation since the first diffusion 
 of Christianity, individuals have been found who, 
 whether excited by fanaticism, vanity, or other less 
 objectionable motives, but, assuredly, in contradiction 
 to the prudential maxim quoted by our blessed 
 Saviour himself, that we should abstain from " tempt- 
 ing the Lord our God," have laid claim to these ex- 
 traordinary gifts, forgetting that, after all, the entire 
 submission of the will, with which we defer to the 
 providential arrangements of our Divine Master, is 
 the best proof as well of our favour with him as of 
 the rectitude of our own hearts. It is a salutary 
 lesson, accordingly, which* seems purposely to have 
 been given to us by Providence in order to correct 
 this prevailing misapprehension, that what we usually 
 styled the extraordinary operations of the Spirit 
 appear to have been occasionally conferred under 
 both the old and new dispensations upon persons 
 whose moral qualifications have been sometimes 
 more than questionable. Thus, in the Old Testa- 
 ment we read of the profligate and mercenary 
 Balaam, the reprobate Saul, and the vacillating and 
 apparently worldly-minded messenger of God's wrath 
 against the altar of Bethel, as severally endowed with 
 the gift of prophecy : and in the New Testament, to 
 look no further than the case of the litigious members 
 of the Corinthian Church addressed by St. Paul, we 
 find there the instance of a far from exemplary set 
 of members of the Christian community exercising 
 the miraculous faculty of languages, which they 
 
202 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 seem undoubtedly to have possessed, for no better 
 purpose than that of personal ostentation and mutual 
 rivalry. It is clear from what we read of the nature 
 of these gifts, from the comparatively short period in 
 which they were allowed to continue, and their com- 
 plete cessation in the later ages, that they had nothing 
 to do with the essential qualifications of the Christiaa 
 character, but were intended solely as instruments 
 for affixing the sanction of Divine authority to the 
 doctrines then inculcated, or for the production of 
 some other specific occasional purpose. Such, ac- 
 cordingly, is St. Paul's judgment respecting them. 
 " Tongues," he observes, " are for a sign, not to them 
 that believe, but to them that believe not." They 
 were, therefore, with the other miraculous powers, 
 well adapted for the peculiar condition of an infant 
 Church, which had by its own intrinsic energy to 
 break its way through the strong resistance of pre-" 
 judice and existing institutions. But, assuredly, 
 they axe not suited for the general well-being of 
 human nature under other less critical circumstances. 
 As marks of God's peculiar favour to this or that 
 person, it is evident thai they could not long be 
 enjoyed without producing a demoralizing effect upon 
 the character of their possessor by the spiritual 
 vanijly which they are so obviously calculated to 
 promote. Consequently, in every instance in Avhich 
 we read of them, they appear never to have been 
 capable of being exercised in any uniform or perma- 
 nent degree ; never, in fact, in such a proportion as to 
 place the parties enjoying them, not even the fore- 
 most and holiest men under both dispensations, 
 above the pressure of incidental calamity, or the 
 operation of natural causes. That they did really 
 exist under both the early Jewish and the early Chris- 
 tian covenants is most certain, not only from the 
 contemporary and unanswerable records which have 
 been transmitted to our times, but also from the 
 lingering bjclief in the continued possession of those 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON/ 203 
 
 gifts which, as we learn from the writings of the 
 early Fathers of the Church, prevailed even in their 
 days, and which disappeared only after a long nega- 
 tive experience had taught mankind no longer to cal- 
 culate upon such special interpositions. The cir- 
 cumstance of their having heen thus withdrawn is of 
 itself sufficient to convince us that we have no reason 
 to regret their loss. As gratuitous marks of God's 
 special favour and acceptance of persons, they would 
 be pernicious to the receiver, and contradictory to the 
 impartial tenor of the Gospel covenant; even as 
 proofs of the truth of the doctrines for which they 
 vouch, they would in our times be inefficacious, since 
 at a period when no really new communication of 
 the Divine Will -can be or ought to be expected, 
 the fact of their being laid claim to by this or that 
 individual would more naturally justify a suspicion 
 of fanaticism or imposture on his part, than of his 
 real and authoritative mission. That man was not 
 intended for the exercise of powers of this intoxi- 
 cating quality is evident from the fact that the pos- 
 session of it has, since the period of the apostolical 
 age, been asserted, for occasional and obviously infe- 
 rior purposes, only by persons of very excitable 
 minds, or the professed leaders of a party, whilst they 
 have been disclaimed successively by those foremost 
 lights and luminaries, the unassuming sanctity of 
 whose lives has reflected the purest splendour upon 
 the records of the Christian Church. We can, in 
 fact, imagine no possible gifts of Providence which 
 would operate so fatally as that now alluded to, upon 
 that humble and confiding faith which is the best 
 possession of a Christian whilst on earth : that faith 
 which " sees not, and yet has believed : " which 
 hopes almost against hope, and remains unshaken in 
 its firm reliance upon the mercies of the Almighty, 
 under the infliction of the heaviest personal calami- 
 lies, or the most overwhelming causes of mental 
 depression: and which, amid the immoveable uni- 
 
204 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 formity of toe works of nature and the seduction 
 of physical causes, can still fix its eye upon those 
 remote but imperishable truths, the real value of 
 which those only can duly appreciate, who by the 
 blessed aid of the Divine Spirit, have overcome the 
 world. 
 
 CHAPTER XXII. 
 
 Recapitulation of some of the foregoing Observations — TVie scrip* 
 turul Doctrine of the Divinity of the Holy Spirit. 
 
 The doctrines of Christianity, thea, differ from the 
 conclusions of mere natural religion in its best and 
 purest form, in the fact that they occupy a more ex- 
 tensive range in their explanation of the mysteries- 
 of God's moral government than can be attempted 
 by our unassisted reason ; and that whilst the lattef 
 is obliged to stop short in the midst of its inquiries^ 
 in consequence of the accumulating perplexities and 
 seeming anomalies which crowd in upon it front 
 every quarter, the former, by the adoption of the twa 
 great collateral truths of the atonement and of assist- 
 ing grace, is enabled to advance a step further, and to 
 reconcile, so far.as to our limited understanding such 
 high topics can be reconciled, the strange phenomena 
 of human nature with the unsullied attributes of the 
 Almighty. That these two momentous positions are 
 not gratuitous and superstitious superadditions to the 
 religion of nature, but, on the contrary, that the 
 exclusion of them would render every reasonable 
 view of religion incomplete, because irrelevant to 
 our acknowledged spiritual wants, must, we con- 
 ceive, be evident to all those who will take the trou- 
 ble of considering this intricate question in all its 
 bearings. It is true, indeed that the force of the 
 conclusion will be felt only by such persons as have 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 205 
 
 impartially explored their way, step by step, through 
 the several stages of previous inquiry. To a mere 
 careless observer, we readily admit that pure and 
 unmixed Deism may, at first glance appear quite 
 sufficient to ansWer all the purposes which a large 
 portion of even the educated classes of mankind are 
 disposed to require from their religion. But still it 
 is only the careless observer who will be thus satis- 
 fied, because he alone is ignorant of the inexplicable 
 difficulties which surround natural religion, con- 
 sidered as a complete system in itself, and when 
 unaided by revelation. It is impossible to take a 
 comprehensive view around us, without coming to 
 the conviction that an arrangement, far more com- 
 plex than the simple principles afforded by the light 
 of nature, is absolutely necessary for meeting all the 
 consequences which such an inquiry suggests. It 
 is accordingly, on this account, we conceive, that 
 probably not one single instance can be quoted of a 
 really painstaking inquirer into the truths of Chris- 
 tianity having closed his studies with a mind uncon- 
 vinced by the force of the evidence on which they 
 rest. The further men proceed in such an investi- 
 gation, the more are they struck by the discovery of 
 coincidences, which completely escape the notice of 
 the less attentive observer. As they trace, link by 
 link, the chain of inferences, one fact leads to, and 
 implies the existence of, another; the detection of 
 an inveterate moral disease within themselves, of 
 which they were not previously aware, necessarily 
 suggests a solicitude after its cure; and thus the 
 inefficacy of the simple expedients which they once 
 deemed sufficient for the purpose becomes more pal- 
 pably evident, in proportion as they are more deeply 
 impressed with a conviction of their danger. Hu- 
 man reason, accordingly, as she advances with con- 
 science for her guide, through the lengthening series 
 of connected consequences, gradually approximates 
 to, though undoubtedly she could never originally 
 18 
 
206 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 discover, by her own light, those very results which 
 revelation so broadly announces. She travels in the 
 right direction, but the barrier which interrupts her 
 course, and obstructs her view forward to more 
 remote truths, is removeable by inspiration only^ 
 It is true that new and unforseen difficulties continue 
 to present themselves during the entire course of 
 her progress, but as a compensation, those more 
 early ones, which originally appeared to her as per- 
 fectly insuperable, satisfactorily adjust themselves, 
 and by the new position which they occupy, cease, 
 as formerly, to startle by their seeming anomaly. 
 It is, however, as has been already remarked, the 
 necessary character of all experimental induction, 
 to remove one source of embarrassment only by the 
 substitution of another, leaving always a residue 
 of mystery as perplexing to our apprehension as- 
 that which first stimulated our inquiry. And this 
 must more particularly be the case in theological 
 pursuits than in any other branch of science. The 
 real proof that we have made an actual progress is, 
 not that no difficulty lies before us, but that those 
 which we have already passed are thus far explained, 
 and, being explained, cohere, by a natural accord- 
 ance, the one with the other. Thus it is in the 
 instance now under discussion. Nothing, surely, 
 can be more satisfactory, as a practical vindication 
 of the mercy and wisdom of our Maker, in placing 
 us in our present singular position in this life, than 
 the certainty of the great truths connected with the 
 process of our redemption. So completely do they 
 appear to solve the most prominent enigmas which 
 present themselves at the very threshold of inquiry, 
 and to ratify the most reasonable postulates of na- 
 tural religion, that they may be said to carry their own- 
 proofs along with them. Still, however, we must 
 recollect, that we have no right or authority to avail 
 ourselves retrospectively of the solution afforded to 
 the difficulties of natural theology by the revealed 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 207 
 
 facts of Scripture, and to decline, at the same time, 
 to admit prospectively the legitimate inferences from 
 those facts, he their character what they may. It 
 is the besetting error of all loose reasoners and half- 
 formed believers in the doctrines of Christianity, 
 to forget that the system of revelation is a consistent 
 and entire whole, and must be accepted by us as 
 such. We make this remark on the present occa- 
 sion for the purpose of observing, that if we once 
 admit the dogmas of justification and sanctification 
 as the two fundamental positions of the Gospel 
 covenant we are bound not to stop at this point, but 
 to advance forward to the strictly inferential but less 
 obvious truths inseparably connected with them. 
 Thus the doctrine of the divinity of Christ, as has 
 been already shown, would appear to follow from 
 the conclusions of reason alone, independently of 
 what we find directly asserted by Scripture to the 
 same effect, if we assent to that of his infinite atone- 
 ment for sin. In like manner the concurrent doc- 
 trine of assisting grace would lead us, by analogy, 
 to the same inference respecting the divine and per- 
 sonal nature of the Holy Spirit, even were revela- 
 tion silent on that subject: we cannot, therefore, be 
 surprised upon finding the express language of the 
 inspired writings conveying the same impression. 
 It is true, indeed, that we cannot, without gross pre- 
 sumption, assert that these two inferences might 
 actually have been arrived at by the natural powers 
 of the understanding tracing the succession of con- 
 nected consequences : all we mean to argue, there- 
 fore, is, that when revelation has once announced 
 them as facts, we can see retrospectively sufficient 
 grounds for admitting them as intrinsically proba- 
 ble. Thus far only we conceive that any reasoning 
 from internal probability can be legitimately car- 
 ried. On these high and transcendental questions 
 all a priori arguments, whether aftirmative or nega- 
 tive, are obviously irrelevant, unless made strictly 
 
208 CONSISTENCY OF KEVELATION 
 
 subservient to the written declarations of the inspired 
 word of God. Points which are confessedly above 
 the reach of human reason, we should recollect, not 
 only may not, but in strictness cannot be contrary to 
 it. We possess no standard within our own minds 
 by which to measure their truth or falsehood, and 
 therefore as it is impossible, by mere argument, to 
 prove their accordance with probability, it is equally 
 so to demonstrate their discordance. 
 
 CHAPTER XXIII. 
 
 Of the Holy Trinity. 
 
 If, however, we admit that the personality and 
 divinity both of the Redeemer and of the Sanctifier 
 of mankind are positively asserted by Scripture, and 
 admit it we must, unless we would shut our eyes to the 
 general tendency of revelation, and the obvious pur- 
 port of common language, then the great Christian 
 doctrine of the Trinity would appear to follow, not 
 so much in the form of an inferential consequence 
 derivable from those premises, as in that of an iden- 
 tical proposition. So far from being an excrescence 
 unnecessarily superadded, by human invention, to 
 the more simple scheme of Christianity, and equally 
 repugnant, as has been alleged, to sound reason and 
 the declarations of Holy Writ, this final and moment- 
 ous truth appears, so far as we may, with all due 
 humility, venture to surmise, to suggest nothing at 
 all repugnant with the former, and to be explicitly 
 established by the latter. It stands, in fact, as the 
 crowning point in which all the converging parts of 
 God's revealed arrangements would seem to termi- 
 nate, and which once removed, would cause the beau- 
 tiful symmetry of that dispensation which Providence 
 had been, for the space of four thousand years, foster- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 209 
 
 iiQg and maturing, until the period of its final promul- 
 gation, to fall of itself piece-meal into a mass of 
 unconnected propositions and of intricate contriv- 
 ances, deprived of any definite end or object. The 
 slightest glance at the heads of the foregoing argu- 
 ments will show that this assertion is not lightly or 
 hastily made. It is, we repeat, evidently impossible 
 to deny the truth of the Trinitarian doctrine, and to 
 retain those of the atonement, and of sanctifying 
 :grace, as part and parcel of Christianity, because the 
 admission of the two latter, by an obvious implica- 
 tion, involves the certainty of the former. Again, 
 we cannot omit those two last-mentioned doctrines 
 from our system of faith, without at once reducing 
 the whole Gospel dispensation to a mere code of 
 morals, not only ineffectual as a practical instrument 
 of righteousness, but actually adding an accession of 
 weight to our already overcharged load of responsi- 
 bility. We cannot again take this very humble view 
 of the character of the great final consummation of 
 our Maker's direct intercourse with mankind, with- 
 out perceiving how very unlike it is, if true, in point 
 of simplicity and contrivance to all the other acknow- 
 ledged operations of Divine wisdom. If such a theory 
 :as that of the Unitarian be correct, then it is quite 
 impossible to reconcile with what we know of the 
 workings of the Almighty mind from the phenomena 
 of the material universe, the very elaborate and 
 intricate series of miracles and predictions which 
 form the subject matter of the Old Testament, and 
 the deviations from the ordinary course of nature 
 which marked the promulgation of the new covenant. 
 The whole system of revelation would, in that case, 
 appear to be a tissue of wonders without an adequate, 
 we might almost say without any, object. In the 
 inaterial creation it is never, so far as the researches 
 of philosophy extend, the apparently efficient cause, 
 but the resulting effects which are diversified and 
 intricate. From one single and often apparently 
 18* 
 
210 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 trifling fact, that, for instance, of the obliquity of the 
 earth's axis, the all-wise Contriver knows how to 
 elicit the most important and multifarious conse- 
 quences, which branch out in every possible direction 
 to the production of beauty and usefulness. Is there, 
 then, any unsoundness in the argument which infers 
 unity of design in all the works of an all-wise Author ? 
 Is it reasonable to suppose that the arrangements of 
 the self-same all-comprehending mind would be found 
 to be at variance with one another? That in one, 
 the least valuable, portion of the universe, causes 
 should be simple, and effects intricate; in the other 
 and most important, that causes should be intricate 
 and effects simple ? The opposite assumption would 
 surely seem the most probable. Such, however, 
 would be the conclusion to which Unitarianism would 
 lead us. If, then, the course of God's spiritual pro- 
 vision for our eternal welfare has been marked, as it 
 assuredly has been, with a superabundant proportion 
 of preparatory contrivance, the inference, from analo- 
 gy, appears obvious, that the result will be found to 
 be in momentous importance proportionate to the 
 beginning; and that a system, the foundation of which 
 has been laid in an almost unbroken continuity of 
 miracles, cannot finally terminate in what might 
 have been accomplished by human means, without 
 the aid of miracle, namely, the inculcation of a mere 
 code of ethical philosophy, however, in itself, admira- 
 ble and perfect. Nothing, surely, according to this 
 view of the subject, can appear more irrational than 
 what is called rational religion. To those who deny, 
 altogether, the inspiration of Scripture, Unitarianism, 
 aided, as it still might be, by the splendid morality 
 of the Bible, is undoubtedly capable of affording a 
 piausible, though unsubstantial, rule of life which, as 
 calculated to please the eye and amuse the ear, and 
 to supply the tongue with well-sounding maxims, 
 may pass for real religion with the careless and lan- 
 guid votary of this world. But it is a perfect contra- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 211 
 
 diction to advance one step further than this point, 
 and, admitting the infallibility of the sacred writings, 
 to attempt to explain away their most unequivocal 
 declarations, solely because our natural understanding 
 cannot keep pace with the wonders which they 
 develope. Revelation professes to lead us beyond the 
 barrier which marks the confines of human know- 
 ledge, and to place, as it were, the very throne and 
 effulgence of the Divine Being almost within our 
 view. Is this the point, at the very moment when 
 human reason fails us, and when every scale and 
 standard of measurement by which we may iudge of 
 the internal truth or falsehood of a proposition becomes 
 inapplicable, where we ought to stop and discuss how 
 much of those hallowed oracles we shall receive, and 
 how much reject ? On questions like these the entire 
 submission of the understanding is assuredly the 
 mark of a strong and not of an infirm mind. The 
 anti-Trinitarian asserts the competency of human 
 reason to pronounce judgment upon even all the 
 transcendental topics which form the subject-matter 
 of revelation, and argues that no proposition which 
 involves a positive contradiction of terms can possibly 
 be true. The obvious answer to this argument is 
 that of inquiring, how he knows that the Trinitarian 
 doctrine does involve the contradiction which he sup- 
 poses. We know, experimentally, that were our 
 acquaintance with the points of secular science less 
 than it is, we should, without hesitation, pronounce 
 many things to be incompatible and contradictory the 
 one to the other which are found to be really congru- 
 ous and coexistent. General assertions are easily got 
 up, and always carry with them an imposing and 
 philosophical air. But a large proportion of the real 
 order of nature is made up of exceptions to such 
 general and comprehensive rules. Thus we often 
 hear it urged, that the acknowledged unity of the 
 Divine nature is manifestly irreconcilable with the 
 Trinitarian doctrine ; individuality of person and of 
 
212 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 consciousness being capable, as it is alleged, under 
 no possible circumstances, of attaching to a Being 
 possessed of a complex mode of existence. The 
 objection, undoubtedly, at first sight, appears forcible. 
 And yet we reply, let the objector, before he proceeds 
 to reason confidently upon the universality of his 
 rule, refer to the fact of his own complex. constitution 
 as an .illustration of it. Man himself, we assert, is 
 in this respect a case in point. Compounded of body 
 and soul, of two substances, which we have the 
 strongest reason for considering as essentially distinct 
 in all their characteristics the one from the other, he 
 still is actually and experimentally one single indi- 
 vidual in the strictest meaning of the term. If, then, 
 we are met by so startling an exception to this seem- 
 ing general maxim at the very outset of our inquiry, 
 surely we can hope little from the guidance of mere 
 reason in the investigation of higher mysteries, where 
 any thing like experimental induction is manifestly 
 out of the question. And yet, strange it is to say, 
 that upon this single assumption, rendered untenable, 
 as it would seem to be, by the most familiar fact, and 
 so completely inapplicable when resorted to as a 
 principle by whicb to judge of the nature of the 
 incomprehensible Creator of the universe, the hypo* 
 thesis of Christian Unitarianism rests almost entirely 
 for its support, sacrificing to an equivocal a priori 
 dictum the whole consistency of the theory, and the 
 mpst direct assertions of the letter of revelation. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 21S 
 
 CHAPTER XXIV. 
 
 On the practical tendency of the Christian virtue of "Faith.** 
 
 We have now, then, taken a general and enlarged, 
 though a hasty, view of the entire scheme of God's 
 interposition for the salvation of mankind, as com- 
 municated to us in the books of the old and new 
 covenants, and we have remarked one uniform idea 
 pervading the whole, which, though developed piece- 
 meal, and at many distinct periods, clearly announ- 
 ces the superintending direction of an Almighty 
 Contriver. The great scope and object of the whole 
 appears to be the reconciling of the free agency and 
 moral training of the human soul with the abstract 
 principles of eternal justice and mercy, by a special 
 arrangement well calculated in this world to call 
 into action the highest quality of spiritual holiness 
 of which our present nature is capable, and in a 
 future state of existence to avert the otherwise 
 inevitable consequences of sin, and to purchase for 
 those, who sincerely conform to the conditions re- 
 quired of them, an eternal allotment of inconceiva- 
 ble felicity. In making this survey, one remarkable 
 circumstance has not failed to strike us; namely, 
 how great a demand is made upon our moral powers 
 of obedience and self-restraint, by a system which, 
 from the external aids both of sanctification and of 
 expiation, which it pledges itself to afford, would 
 appear above all other modes of religion calculated 
 to encourage personal indolence. This is one of 
 the most singular features of revelation, and strongly 
 illustrates the wisdom with which it has been con- 
 trived; namely, that its practical operation is inva- 
 riably found to steer clear of those defects to which, 
 when viewed as a mere theory, it would seem obvi- 
 
214 CONSISTENCY OP REVELATION 
 
 ously to lead. No doctrine appears at first sight 
 more likely to suspend the exertion of every active 
 power within us than that which inculcates that all 
 our best endeavours are the special gift of an exter- 
 nal agency, and that our only hopes of external sal- 
 vation rest not upon our own personal merits, but 
 upon a vicarious expiation wrought for us, without 
 any effective assistance on our part. That such an 
 hypothesis would tend in its operation to depress 
 rather than to elevate the human character, seems, 
 we confess, a natural and almost inevitable inference ; 
 and that such actually is its tendency has been not 
 unfrequently asserted by its enemies. And yet we 
 find, experimentally, that nothing can be more re- 
 mote from the truth than such a conclusion. We 
 have reverted to these remarks, which have already 
 been advanced on a former occasion, for the sake of 
 the illustration they afford with respect to the value 
 and character of the one great and prominent Chris- 
 tian virtue — faith. The instrument by which alone 
 we are assured that we can lay hold of the benefits 
 proffered to our acceptance by the Gospel Covenant 
 is this quality of faith ; and, in order that we may 
 lie under no misapprehension with respect to the full 
 meaning of the term, we find it repeatedly described 
 by Scripture as being not merely an implicit belief 
 in the fact of Christ's mission, but also a reposing 
 confidence upon his atonement for sin, and an abso- 
 lute denial, and renunciation of any merit whatever 
 as attaching to our own actions. At the same time, 
 it is an undeniable truth, that the self-same Scrip- 
 tures, which appear thus to detract from the merit 
 of good works, are most peremptory and uncompro- 
 mising in the tone in which they demand them at our 
 hands. Here is every appearance of a direct contra- 
 diction ; and yet it is only one of those seeming con- 
 tradictions which, as if for the purpose of humilia- 
 ting human reason, are scattered, from time to time, 
 through the inspired volume, but which, practically, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 2l5 
 
 are found to be replete with profound wisdom. If 
 accordingly we will take a retrospective glance at 
 human history, and ask what single quality and 
 affection of the mind of man has achieved more acts 
 of real heroism, has more perse veringly compassed 
 sea and land in quest of works of charity, has more 
 uniformly subdued the natural arrogance of the heart 
 in the full tide of temporal prosperity, or armed it with 
 the most exemplary and cheerful patience under the 
 severest inflictions of adversity, we shall boldly an- 
 swer, faith. There is, in fact, no imaginable state 
 of mind, no circumstance or condition of life, to 
 which this foremost Christian principle is not calcu- 
 lated to extend a beneficial influence. Faith is the 
 appointed means by which we are enabled to avail 
 ourselves of the benefits intended to be conveyed to 
 mankind by the death of Christ ; and it is so for this 
 substantial reason, because it is the principle by the 
 adoption of which we can alone render ourselves like 
 unto him by the holiness and purity of our lives, by 
 the unaffected humility of our obedience, and by the 
 sublimity of our spiritual aspirations. Faith, far more 
 than any other spiritual operation with which we are 
 acquainted, extinguishes within us the corrupt appe- 
 tites of the flesh by approximating us to, and almost 
 indentifying us with, our great Exemplar and Pattern. 
 To have faith in Christ, in the full Scriptural sense, 
 is obviously, not merely to believe that he is, or that 
 he came into the world, and continued in it for a 
 definite period ; but it is the belief that he came to 
 save sinners, when no less a sacrifice could avert 
 from them the Divine wrath ; it is our conviction of 
 the extreme deadliness and abomination of sin which 
 could render so vast an expiation necessary, with the 
 consequent inference of the obligation of aiming at 
 the highest stage of holiness to Avhich our imperfect 
 nature can attain, and of cultivating the deepest 
 sentiments of gratitude to God, of distrust of our- 
 selves, and of charity towards our fellow-creatures, 
 
216 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 who, having been involved in one common condem- 
 nation, are now, together with us, candidates for 
 our Maker's unearned and gratuitous mercy. It is 
 obvious, that nothing short of the high wrought 
 feeling now described can deserve to be designated 
 as that faith which the Gospel inculcates. To ima- 
 gine that the same awful Being who submitted to 
 pay the forfeiture of sin in his own person could 
 intend, by so doing, to sanction, and even encourage, 
 the renewed commission of it; that it is seemly, or 
 even possible, to know that we have received so vast 
 a benefit, and yet not to love the Benefactor ; that 
 loving him with all befitting fervour, we could deli- 
 berately wish to disobey his commands, and coun- 
 teract his holy purposes, or that such fervour of love 
 can be consistent with limited and desultory efforts 
 after righteousness, with cruelty, selfishness, and in- 
 solence towards others, or with an undue preference 
 of teinporal to spiritual objects, are all of them 
 manifest contradictions. " If ye love me," says our 
 blessed Saviour, " keep my commandments." Faith 
 then, so far from being a merely theoretical, is, in 
 the strongest meaning of the term, a practical excel- 
 lence. It is impossible substantially to possess it 
 without the adoption of that new life and that purity 
 and regeneration of the character which is the best 
 proof of the accompanying grace of God's Holy 
 Spirit, and which the Apostle so well describes when 
 he figuratively compares it to being dead with Christ 
 unto sin, and raised again with him to a life of spi- 
 ritual holiness ; and with reference to which happy 
 state he asserts, that he who is of Christ sins not. 
 
 Would men have early learned to distinguish be- 
 tween the very dissimilar ideas conveyed by the term 
 faith when intended merely to designate belief in a 
 purely historical fact, which is obviously compatible 
 with a very low grade of devotional feeling, and by 
 the same word when expressing a conscientious adop- 
 tion of all the momentous inferences above enu- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 217 
 
 merated, the false assumptions which have prevailed 
 on both sides of this important question could never 
 have thrown the stigma upon Christianity which, 
 unfortunately, they have done. But the fact is, that 
 nothing is so difficult in religious discussion as to 
 keep the middle road. The holiest truths ever lie 
 in close contact with the most pernicious falsehoods, 
 and it often requires no small nicety of moral discern- 
 ment to distinguish between them. Exaggerated 
 statements, and the predilection for one part of a 
 system, at the expense, and to the neglect of all the 
 rest, are the bane of Christianity, as they have been 
 the grand impediments in the way of man's advance- 
 ment in all wholesome science whatever. It is the 
 rectitude of the heart which can alone direct the 
 understanding safely amid the many conflicting 
 theories resulting from false ingenuity and partial 
 views of the spirit of revelation : and that rectitude 
 can be duly maintained only by keeping the devo- 
 tional feelings warm, and our carnal imaginations 
 cool and collected ; by enlarged and cheering views 
 of the arrangements of that great Being who, we are 
 assured, would not that any, the least of his creatures, 
 should perish, accompanied with the most unfeigned 
 humility with regard to our own personal merits; 
 and by a deep conviction, on the other hand, that not 
 even the plentiude of Divine mercy itself can release 
 us from that duty of purity and holiness which, even 
 were all future retribution out of the question, would 
 necessarily attach to us as moral and intellectual 
 beings. 
 
 19 
 
218 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION?? 
 
 CHAPTER XXV. 
 
 Of Ecclesiastical Authority and Ordinances. 
 
 In the foregoing remarks we have attempted tfy 
 trace the gradual growth and developement of the 
 great scheme of revelation from its first imperfect 
 commencement, as adapted to the wants of a compara- 
 tively low grade of society, to that later period when 
 it at length shone forth in full splendour, and, by its 
 overpowering brilliancy, extinguished, as it were, 
 all the weaker lights of human ethics, which the 
 researches of the wisest men of antiquity had set up 
 for the guidance of mankind. We have also endea- 
 voured to show that, perplexing as some of the facts 
 which it announces may be to our reason, and even 
 startling as some of its doctrines may at first sight 
 appear to our moral feelings, the practical operation 
 of that revelation upon the human character is what 
 we cannot possibly appreciate too highly ; and that, 
 under its auspicious influence, the soul of man is 
 capable, even in this world, of attaining to a moral 
 growth and elevation of which those who derive their 
 notions from other modifications of belief cannot form 
 the slightest idea. Such then, we repeat, is Chris- 
 tianity in its essentials, both with respect to faith and 
 practice; and suchj had human nature been disposed, 
 of its own accord, to choose the good and refuse the 
 evil, would it probably been left to us by Providence 
 in all its intrinsic simplicity, without those accom- 
 panying enactments and institutions which, in strict- 
 ness, are to be viewed rather as necessary defensive 
 accessories than as part and parcel of its original 
 structure. Such, however, unfortunately, is the per- 
 versity of our passions, that almost as much elaborate 
 contrivance is netiiessary to enable us to enjoy the 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 219 
 
 best gifts of Providence, without abusing or diverting 
 them from their original purpose, as to purchase the 
 original possession of them. It is not enough that 
 God has filled this world with almost inexhaustible 
 blessings, but it is also necessary that coercive human 
 laws should regulate the mode of their fruition, should 
 restrain fraud and rapine, and prevent our perverting 
 them to our own injury, and to that of society in 
 general. So is it also with the important concerns 
 of religion. Were no mistaken views, the results of 
 carnal passion, likely to bias our opinions ; did no 
 hebetude of judgment continually interpose itself to 
 prevent our taking in the entire conception and the 
 exact proportions of the respective articles of our 
 faith ; were there no such a thing as a captious 
 ingenuity, which loves to overstate antagonist por- 
 tions of docrine, and no selfishness which shrinks 
 from the practice of every self-denying duty, then, 
 indeed, the beautiful system of Christian morals 
 might have stood unsupported by any external aid, 
 and have been left to the awakened good feelings of 
 mankind to attract their admiration and improve their 
 practice. But these visionary dreams of perfection 
 nave nothing to do with the present very humble 
 circumstances of our nature. The pure essentials of 
 religion can be no more maintained under the exist- 
 ing constitution of this world without the aid of dis- 
 cipline and an established ritual, than the political 
 welfare of society can remain flourishing without the 
 awe and deference attaching to the authority of the 
 magistrate. We are perfectly conscious of the deli- 
 cacy of the ground on which we are now treading. 
 It is, we admit, an obvious truth that no restraints 
 upon our presumed natural liberty can be designated 
 as really good in themselves, but only inasmuch 
 as they enable us to enjoy blessings which would be 
 otherwise inaccessible. We admit, also, the encroach- 
 ing nature of all human judgment when interfering 
 with the questions of religion, and the necessity of 
 
220 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 maintaining a jealous caution that the word of God 
 shall not be rendered of none effect by becoming 
 intermingled with the traditions of man. But it 
 is certain, on the other hand, that even were the 
 word of God silent on this important question, the 
 whole history of the last eighteen centuries would 
 show that pure and unadulterated Christianity can 
 really flourish only where the waywardness and self- 
 will of individual caprice is subjected to the restraints 
 of wholesome and enlightened authority. It is not 
 indeed necessary, and it is far from our wish on this 
 occasion, to dwell in any length upon the very deli- 
 cate and much contested point respecting any pecu- 
 liar forms of ecclesiastical government, how far and 
 under what modification such systems existed in the 
 primitive Church, and may be considered as impera- 
 tive upon the consciences of succeeding generations. 
 In a dissertation, the express object of which is to 
 promote unity of spiritual faith among all denomina- 
 tions of Christians, by pointing out the remarkable 
 coherence of the respective parts of revelation one 
 with the other, and their concurrence in promoting 
 one grand and ultimate design, it cannot be expedient 
 to excite the feelings of party jealousy by speaking 
 invidiously on less essential topics, upon which we 
 may charitably presume that an erroneous opinion 
 may be maintained without a forfeiture of the funda- 
 mentals of sound belief. Respecting, therefore, and 
 admiring as we do that form of discipline more 
 especially recognised in this country, which we cer- 
 tainly conceive to approach as nearly to the apostoli- 
 cal model as the altered circumstances of mankind 
 will admit, we shall still content ourselves with 
 merely observing that even the most ardent champion 
 of Christian liberty must confess, if he reason fairly, 
 that a respectful deference to that system of authori- 
 tative restraint, be it what it will, which is found 
 practically necessary for the discouragement of here- 
 tical innovation, is as strictly a point of conscientious 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 221 
 
 ^Mgation as any other case of obedience to the 
 Divine Will. " God is not the author of confusion, 
 but of peace." Spiritual as the character of Chris- 
 tian worship is, and encouraging, as it undoubtedly 
 does, the most direct intercourse between the human 
 supplicant and the great object of his adoration, it is 
 quite evident that so long as it is intended for the 
 benefit of mankind it will require to be fenced round 
 with those precautionary outworks against the en- 
 croachments of fanaticism, superstition, and unauthor- 
 ized human interpretation, which if allowed full 
 liberty of action would shortly destroy its very 
 essence. It is in vain that we deprecate the existence 
 of ecclesiastical authority so far as its functions are 
 soberly exercised in promoting the solemnity, de- 
 cency, and evangelical purity of public worship, if . 
 the waywardness of human passion be such as to 
 Tender that authority imperatively necessary. Our 
 Blessed Saviour, himself, by the institution of the two 
 external rites of baptism and the Eucharist, and by 
 the solemn delegation of the ministerial functions to 
 his chosen apostles, clearly demonstrated that it was 
 not the object of the Gospel dispensation to super- 
 sede entirely the use of ritual observances, or the 
 exercise of wholesome interference when called for 
 by the waywardness of licentious opinion. In the 
 13th chapter of the Book of the Acts of the Apostles, 
 also, we find the rite of ministerial ordination by the 
 imposition of hands sanctioned by immediate inspira- 
 tion. "As they (the members of the Church of 
 Antioch) ministered to the Lord and fasted, the Holy 
 Ghost said, ' Separate me Barnabas and Saul, for the 
 work whereunto I have called them.' And when they 
 had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, 
 they sent them away : So they, being sent forth by 
 the Holy Ghost, departed," &c. What proposition, 
 it might have been confidently asked, is more palpa- 
 bly self-evident, than that the choice of the Holy 
 Spirit would be a sufficient authority and qualifica' 
 19* 
 
222 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 tion for its ministers, without the intervention of 
 human agency? Yet here that very Spirit is de- 
 scribed as requiring that the communication of its 
 gifts should be ratified by the delegation of the visible 
 Church. Again, Ave read in the same portion of 
 Sacred History that the assembled Church of Jerusa- 
 lem thought fit to resolve, authoritatively, the then 
 much agitated question respecting the expediency of 
 circumcision, and to issue at the same time other 
 rules for the spiritual direction of the new converts ; 
 and we learn also from the Apostolical Epistles that 
 the various Churches scattered over Greece and Asia 
 were severally placed under the guidance of their 
 respective Governors, who possessed and exercised 
 power for the ordination of well qualified teachers, 
 and the excommunication of the corrupters of the true 
 doctrine. The doubt, therefore, if any, respecting 
 Church authority is clearly not one of fact, for that is 
 admitted by all parties, but of degree only. But the 
 discussion and settlement of that precise degree which 
 shall be neither more nor less than what expediency 
 requires, is one of the most difficult problems which 
 the practical study of theology suggests. Certain, 
 however, it is that the line of demarcation which 
 separates the strict essentials of Christian faith from 
 those accessory rules and institutions which form its 
 outworks, and Avere intended solely for its protection, 
 from external injury, should never be lost sight of 
 by those who are anxious to imbibe the unadulterated 
 spirit of Christianity. Without a jealous vigilance 
 against the possible substitution of the dicta of 
 human judgment in the place of the inspired and 
 authoritative oracles of God, we know from expe- 
 rience that the introduction into the Church of super- 
 stitious formalities and of spiritual usurpation is 
 inevitable. But we know, also, on the other hand, 
 that nothing is more certain, than that if by advo- 
 cating Avhat is called Christian liberty it is intended to 
 introduce a complete emancipation from all right of 
 
WITH HUMAN REA8(».»» ... 
 
 |[TT T7 
 
 dictation to the ignorant, or of ceMure^nd remon 
 strance to the fantastic pervertersXrf" ^)»pel truth, 
 human selfishness and presumption, should the at; 
 tempt be successful, would soon efi'eciually blot 
 all the distinctive characteristics of the religion of 
 Christ, and the inspired book of Scripture would be 
 made to mean every thing or nothing according as it 
 might chance to fall into the hand of this or that self- 
 constituted teacher. 
 
 These observations are introduced in this place 
 merely to show, that if at this late period of the world, 
 after eighteen centuries of discussion, too often carried 
 on under feelings of morbid excitement, the character 
 of our religion has become apparently less simple 
 than it was in the primitive ages of the Church, and 
 if theology has become in the course of that time 
 more of a science, and, therefore, as it might seem, 
 less the exclusive creature of our moral apprehen- 
 sions, the fault is one which it is much more easy to 
 lament than to correct. Heresies are seldom, if ever, 
 wilful perversions of Divine truth gratuitously intro- 
 duced, but are almost always the result of over-san- 
 guine tempers or contracted understandings partially 
 culling and selecting favourite passages from the 
 general context of revelation, according to the pecu- 
 liar tastes and prejudices of the disputant. And the 
 misfortune is, that the remedy adopted by the oppos- 
 ing party has loo often been of the same nature with 
 the original grievance. By inclining too strongly to 
 the side most removed from the princ.iples which 
 they have attempted to refute, the assailants of heresy 
 have themselves become heretical, and by deviating 
 from the narrow central line have fallen into errors 
 not less contrary to the tenor of revelation than those 
 of their adversaries. It is thus that the progress of 
 mankind, in the department of theology, has been 
 for the most part a series of oscillations betwixt 
 extreme opinions, rather than a cautious process of 
 induction founded upon comprehensive views of the 
 
 nB 
 
224 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 "whole system of revelation. The consequence, ac- 
 cordingly, has been, that the simple and beautiful 
 scheme, which might originally have been brought 
 home to the breast of the most ignorant and illiterate, 
 when inculcating, exclusively, the two great funda- 
 mental truths of justification and sanctification, has, 
 from an inevitable necessity, become fenced round 
 with its peculiar technical phraseology and precise 
 definitions : and in proportion as experience has 
 shown how numerous are the passages to error, the 
 necessity of superintendence, not so much, indeed, for 
 the purpose of coercive control, as of ftiendly admo- 
 nition, has become daily more and more manifest. 
 it is on this account that the continual recurrence to 
 the first principles of Gospel truth, abstracted from 
 their incidental accompaniments, has become in later 
 times of increasing importance to the Christian stu- 
 dent. The complexity of character which attaches 
 to the modern science of theology can, as has been 
 already remarked, be effectually diminished only by 
 a due care in discriminating between the essentials of 
 religion as points of doctrine, and those accessories 
 which, however sanctioned by divine authority, are 
 are after all to be considered solely as defensive super- 
 additions. 
 
 The apostolical rule on the subject of minor differ- 
 ences in ecclesiastical opinions is a wise and salutary 
 one ; that we should keep the devotional feeling of 
 the heart right, and the judgment of the understand- 
 ing will, under the Divine blessing, follow in the right 
 direction. *' Let us, as many as be perfect, be thus 
 minded : and if in any thing ye be otherwise minded, 
 God shall reveal even this unto you." Attend mainly 
 to the great and essential propositions, and all the 
 minor inferences will, of their own accord, fall into 
 their proper place, and present themselves to our 
 view in their just proportions. The simplicity of the 
 primitive age, indeed, can be no more maintained in 
 this advanced period of the world, than the artless 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 225 
 
 sentiments of boyhood can be retained in the busi- 
 ness-like maturity of life. But integrity of intention 
 may still enable us, to the last, to unite the harmless- 
 ness of the dove to the wisdom of the serpent. Even 
 now, notwithstanding the necessary complexity of our 
 knowledge, our faith may be as pure as that of the 
 early Christians, provided only that our devotional 
 feelings are as earnest as theirs : nor need the many 
 safeguards which legislative wisdom, having God's 
 oracles for its guide, has, from time to time, estab- 
 lished for the encouragement of the sound doctrine, 
 prove a greater cause of offence to the fervent believer 
 in revelation, than are the wholesome restraints of 
 secular law to those who voluntarily measure their 
 conduct by those great rules of morality, the practice 
 of which it is the object of the legislator and of the 
 magistrate to enforce. 
 
 CHAPTER XXVI. 
 
 Of the Miracles recorded in the New Testament. 
 
 The object of the present dissertation being to 
 remark upon the singular consistency of design and 
 contrivance which marks the whole system of revela- 
 tion, from first to last, it will be necessary, in order 
 to make our survey complete, that we should take 
 notice of that series of preternatural events which 
 accompanied the final promulgation of Christianity. 
 On the supposition that the covenant of the Gospel 
 is a continuation and the final completion of that 
 system of special providential interference which the 
 books of the Old Testament assert to have been in 
 operation from the very commencement of the world, 
 it might naturally be expected that its Almighty Con- 
 triver should signalize this momentous consummation 
 of his mysterious purpose by some display of his 
 
226 CONSISTENCY OF KEVELATION 
 
 favour, not less striking than those attending on his 
 earlier and less perfect dispensations. This circum- 
 stance, in fact, would be nothing more than main- 
 taining that uniformity of general character which is 
 always found to pervade the different works of the 
 same author. Now, not only do the books of the 
 New Testament assert that such a course of miracles 
 as might, from analogy, have been presumed upon, 
 did actually take place on that latter occasion, but we 
 may observe also, that the actual miracles recorded, 
 "whilst they bear testimony to the reality of the Mosaic 
 dispensation, are distinguished from the earlier ones 
 hy a peculiar character of beneficence which exactly 
 accords with the more merciful purport of that purer 
 law which they were intended to confirm. The whole 
 design of the institutions of Moses was confessedly 
 of a harsher description than that of Christianity. 
 They required strict ritual obedience in all points. 
 *'The man that doelh them shall live in them," was 
 their unbending injunction ; and, accordingly, the 
 miraculous powers of the legislator were as often 
 employed in inflicting tremendous judgments upoa 
 the disobedience of his followers, as in rescuing them 
 from danger, or in relieving the pressure of their daily 
 wants. Christ came in a meeker and milder spirit, 
 announcing the great fact of man's reconciliation with 
 his Maker, by gratuitous redemption communicated 
 through the medium of faith ; and the miracles which 
 he performed were all of a benevolent description. 
 Both arrangements, therefore, were severally apposite 
 to the respective times, and circumstances, and 
 designs of the laws thus promulgated. The Levitical 
 ritual was given from Sinai, in thunders and earth- 
 quakes, and so terrible was the sight, that Moses 
 said, " I exceedingly fear and quake." The coming 
 of the Messiah was announced by angels proclaiming 
 *' peace on earth, and good will towards men," A 
 large portion of the miraculous machinery of the 
 earlier covenant, again, consisted of prophetic antici- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON, 227 
 
 pations of the future spiritual prospects of mankind. 
 This, as has been already observed, was peculiarly- 
 well fitted to the character of a merely provisional 
 law, the most important declarations of which were 
 all of them prospective. The prophecies of the New 
 Testament, on the contrary, with the exception of 
 the Apocalypse of St. John, are thinly scattered, and 
 even where they occur resemble rather the incidental 
 overflowings of a super-human knoAvledge, extending 
 over futurity, than special forewarnings, given for 
 some yet undeveloped purpose. The probable reason 
 of this would seem to be, that the Divine arrange- 
 ments being now complete, the attention of mankind, 
 which previously required to be turned in a forward 
 direction, was now more suitably rendered retro- 
 spective. 
 
 But if, for the causes now alleged, the gift of pro- 
 phecy would appear to have been a less appropriate 
 qualification of the inspired teachers of the new dis- 
 pensation than of those of the old, the same argument 
 would not apply to the question respecting miracles 
 of another description. It maybe confidently asserted 
 that the human mind could be aroused from the in- 
 veterate associations of worldly habits, and have its 
 attention turned away from that system of selfish 
 indulgence so natural to its feelings, to pursuits of a 
 directly opposite description, only by the astounding 
 thunder-clap of a voice confessedly speaking with 
 more than mortal authority. It is in vain to quote, 
 in contradiction to this remark, the trite aphorism, 
 that truth requires only to be stated in order to be 
 assented to. The whole history of human nature is 
 a refutation of this observation, if intended to apply 
 to the inculcation of moral and religious truth. The 
 conscience of every systematic sinner must be alarmed 
 before it can be effectively awakened : the appeal to 
 the attention of the worldly-minded must come in the 
 form of an authoritative demand, and not of an humble 
 request for a hearing. Far the truth of this remark 
 
228 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 we challenge that intuitive knowledge of the heart of 
 man which every person who has heen thrown into 
 much practical intercourse with general society cannot 
 fail, in some degree, of possessing. Miracles, accord- 
 ingly, we are informed by Scripture, have, both under 
 the former and the latter covenants, accompanied all 
 special communications from heaven. Admitting the 
 fact of such communications being not otherwise 
 improbable, (a point which it has been the aim of the 
 foregoing observations to prove,) it is so far from 
 unreasonable that they should have been specially 
 ratified by the evidence of miracles, that, in fact, we 
 cannot conceive their effecting their intended object 
 without such adventitious aid. If such extraordinary 
 testimony was necessary for the establishment of the 
 religion of Moses, it was, clearly, not less so for the 
 supersedence of that same religion by the Gospel of 
 Christ. Institutions Avhich had been sanctioned by 
 the most portentous deviations from the ordinary 
 course of nature, could not, and in strictness ought 
 not, to be expected to give way to the preaching of a 
 few individuals, producing no equivalent authority in 
 proof of their Divine mission. 
 
 Thus much, then, may be confidently urged in reply 
 to the objections of those persons who profess to be 
 startled and offended by the miraculous phenomena 
 which we read of as having attended the appearance 
 of Christ. Grant his mission to have been a real 
 one, and it were a mere gratuitous scepticism to dis- 
 pute the supernatural powers either of himself or of 
 his authorized followers. The facts in question, be 
 it remembered, are vouched for, unless the whole 
 series of revelation be a fiction, not merely by their 
 own peculiar attesting witnesses, but substantially 
 also by those who bore testimony to the prodigies 
 wrought by Moses and the Jewish prophets. If the 
 attestation confirmatory of the miracles of the Old 
 Testament is strong, the affirmative inference is, by 
 a necessary course of argument, reflected onward 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 229 
 
 from them upon those of the latter dispensation also, 
 as integral portions of the same continuous process 
 of Divine interference. 
 
 To this consistency, then, of the whole design, we 
 would appeal, for the purpose of removing from every 
 candid and impartial mind any involuntary prepos- 
 session occasioned by the survey of isolated and 
 detached parts. It is unfair to the infinitely accumu- 
 lated evidences of our religion to consider it as 
 depending for its proofs upon a series of unconnected 
 interpositions of Providence, each requiring to be 
 , separately vouched for by its own peculiarly and 
 entirely distinct arguments. The proper point of view 
 in which it ought to be regarded is that of one great 
 continuous miracle, to which, until the period of its 
 final completion, generation after generation of eye- 
 witnesses bore their successive but really concurrent 
 testimony. 
 
 There is, however, it must be at the same time 
 observed a degree of contemporaneous evidence 
 attaching to the miracles recorded in tlie New Testa- 
 ment, still niore cogent if possible, even than that 
 which obliges us to assent to the authenticity of those 
 related in the Jewish Scriptures. That is to say, 
 from the circumstance of their having been performed 
 at a later ])eriod of the world, and in an age of more 
 advanced literature, the idea of explaining them away 
 by referring them to mistake or deception is rendered 
 still more completely untenable. "These things," 
 as St. Paul observed of them, " were not done in a 
 corner ;" >^nt the publicity to which they were ex- 
 posed, and which he so confidently challenges, Avas 
 that of jealous adversaries rather than of friends. 
 That they were able to stand the test of this search- 
 ing scrutiny is certain from the fact of the rapid 
 spread of the doctrines, in confirmation of which 
 those miracles were appealed to. Such is the obvious 
 conclusion which we are compelled to arrive at, when 
 we look to tlie singular- transactions related in the 
 20 
 
230 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 historical books of the New Testament, and compare 
 them with what we there read respecting the other- 
 wise inexplicable growth, at the period referred to, 
 of the infant Christian Church. But it is not from 
 these perhaps partial sources alone that we are 
 obliged to derive our evidence. The allusions of 
 contemporary profane writers to the as yet small, 
 but rapidly increasing, community of Christians is 
 exactly what might be expected, on the supposition 
 that the account given by the New Testament is the 
 true one. They are merely incidental, indeed, and 
 give their testimony rather by implication than by 
 express and direct assertion, but this very circum- 
 stance only renders it more intrinsically probable. 
 In the first place, the broad outline of facts, as we 
 find them occasionally referred to in the works of 
 that period, though often vague, are all at least per- 
 fectly in harmony with the Scriptural account. We 
 know, for instance, as assuredly as we do any of the 
 transactions of modern history, that towards the close 
 of the reign of Tiberius a peculiar sect grew up 
 amongst the Jews, who confidently asserted that 
 occurrences of the most extraordinary description 
 had taken place at Jerusalem, and in the surrounding 
 territory, within an extremely short period from that 
 time, some of them in the presence of large multi- 
 tudes of witnesses, and one, the most remarkable, 
 in the face of the whole assembled population of 
 Judea. We know that, notwithstanding this appeal 
 to public notoriety, which, if the statement were 
 untrue, carried with it its own refutation, these 
 accounts were received as authentic by vast numbers 
 of persons competent to judge of the reality of the 
 facts, many of whom bore testimony, by their blood, 
 to the sincerity of their belief. We know that the 
 doctrines thus originating pervaded, within a very 
 short period of years, considerable portions of Asia, 
 of Greece, of Italy, and most probably of Spain and 
 Gaul ; and that though the most terrific persecutions 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON, 231 
 
 awaited their professors, vast numbers were found 
 even in Rome itself, who submitted to endure the 
 most cruel deaths rather than abjure their faith. 
 But, as has just now been observed, some of the 
 casual circumstances, related incidentally, and with- 
 out any intended reference to the circumstances of 
 the early Christians, by contemporary profane his- 
 torians, afford, where they least intended it, a singu- 
 lar collateral confirmation of the truth of the Gospel 
 history. Thus we find, in the fourth book of Taci- 
 tus's history, a strange anecdote related of the Em- 
 peror Vespasian (who, be it remembered, had passed 
 a considerable portion of his military career in Judea,) 
 that when he visited Egypt, subsequently to his 
 accession to the empire, he cured by a touch a man 
 afflicted with total blindness. It is impossible to 
 read the original account of this transaction without 
 observing its strong resemblance to some of the 
 miracles performed by our Saviour. How, it natu- 
 rally occurs to us to ask, could so strange an idea 
 occur to a Roman Emperor, the occupier of a throne 
 which had so recently been filled by such profligate 
 characters as Vitellius, Otho, and Nero, as that of 
 attempting to perform a preternatural cure of this 
 description ? None of the most insanely arrogant of 
 his predecessors had ever made the like experiment. 
 We surely cannot doubt but that Vespasian's long 
 residence in Judea had made him familiar with the 
 recorded facts of our Saviour's history, and with the 
 more recent miracles of his disciples, and that he 
 was led by vanity, or curiosity, to attempt perform- 
 ing the like wonders. That he succeeded we of 
 course cannot believe ; though it is most probable 
 that plausible testimony would not be wanting to 
 support the claims of an emperor ambitious of this 
 peculiar kind of reputation. To the same effect are 
 the two memorable passages which occur in Tacitus 
 and Suetonius, where those writers apply to the 
 person of Vespasian the ancient Jewish prophecy 
 
232 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 respecting the Messiah, whose advent was looked 
 for about that period. The words of the latter his- 
 torian are very remarkable. " Percrebuerat Oriente 
 toto vetus et constans opinio esse in fatis ut eo tempore 
 JiidcBa profecti rerum potirentur. Id de Imperatore 
 Romano quantum postea eventu patuit, prajdictum 
 Judfei ad se trahentes rebellarunt." In this state- 
 ment it is impossible not to recognise the expectatioQ 
 then prevalent among the Jews respecting the ap- 
 proaching accomplishment of the seventy weeks of 
 Daniel, which we learn from Josephus to have led to^ 
 those many insurrections, under the guidance of 
 fanatics and impostors, which eventually caused the 
 destruction of Jerusalem and the dispersion of the 
 Jewish nation. 
 
 But (to return from the indirect testimony of pro- 
 fane to the direct evidence of sacred history) we 
 shall not, we conceive, be chargeable with the fallacy 
 of proving a thing by itself, if we appeal to the 
 inspired writers themselves, as affording the strong- 
 est possible confirmation of the truth of the miracles 
 they record. It has been already observed, that the 
 prophetic character, with the exception of the apoca- 
 lypse of St. John, attaches much less to the books of 
 the New than to those of the Old Testament. That 
 there are however, predictions contained in the 
 Christian Scriptures, the fulfilment of which has 
 been so literally accomplished as to leave no possi- 
 bility of doubt respecting the inspiration of their 
 authors, provided we admit the genuineness of the 
 works in question, is, on the other hand, perfectly 
 certain. Those of St. Paul, which allude to the cor- 
 ruptions which would one day prevail in the Christian 
 Church, and which so accurately describe some of the 
 leading abominations of Popery, cannot indeed be got 
 rid of even by the presumption of their being a 
 forgery, as they are, at all events, demonstrably of a 
 much earlier date than can be assigned to the first 
 origin of the abuses which they denounce. But 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON^ 233 
 
 going farther back in time, and referring to the pro- 
 phetic denunciations of our Saviour respecting the 
 approaching destruction of Jerusalem, we may con- 
 fidently assert of them, that if the date assigned to 
 them be accurate, they prove to demonstration that 
 he who uttered them was possessed of more than 
 human knowledge. It is impossible to read the 
 twenty-first chapter of St. Luke's Gospel, and other 
 similar passages in the four Evangelists, respecting 
 the fearful calamities which were in preparation for 
 that devoted city, and then to compare them with the 
 account given by Josephus of what actually passed 
 during the horrible circumstances of the siege by 
 which it was overpowered, without assenting to the 
 certainty of this conclusion. In the twenty-third 
 chapter of St. Luke we read, for instance, that our 
 Redeemer addressed the following words to the 
 women who followed him with their lamentations to 
 the place of his crucifixion : — " Daughters of Jerusa- 
 lem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves and 
 your children ; for, behold ! the days are coming in 
 which they shall say. Blessed are the barren, and the 
 wombs that never bare, and the paps which never 
 gave suck. Then shall they begin to say to the mouri' 
 tainSyfall on us^ and to the hills, cover us,^* If we wish 
 to understand the allusion contained in the latter 
 part of this address, we have only to turn to the 
 seventh, eighth, and ninth chapters of the sixth book 
 of Josephus's Wars of the Jews, and we there find 
 that when the siege of Jerusalem, under Titus, was 
 drawing to its last crisis, many of the mutineers 
 within the walls, who had first stirred up the rebel- 
 lion against the Roman power, and who had exercised, 
 in the course of the war, the most atrocious cruelties 
 against their own countrymen, desperate of pardon 
 from either party, betook themselves, as their last 
 resource, to the excavations formed under the town by 
 the working of the quarrieSy and there peHshed to the 
 number of more than two thousand by suicide^ by mutual 
 20* 
 
234 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 violence^ and hy hunger. There is, assuredly, none 
 of ihe calculated ambiguity of false oracles, conceal- 
 ing their real iguorance under the shelter of equi- 
 vocal expressions, observable in this singular pro- 
 phecy. What proof, then, have Ave that this predic- 
 tion was uttered nearly forty years before the events 
 which it foretold, and that Jerusalem was still in 
 existence at the time that it was thus recorded by the 
 Evangelist in the Gospel which bears his name? 
 The argument, which lies in small compass, may be 
 shortly stated thus. The prophecy above quoted 
 occurs, as has been stated, in St. Luke's Gospel. 
 But the same author, in his preface to his book of the 
 Acts of the Apostles, refers to his Gospel as di former 
 treatise. The date of the book of the Acts, then, is 
 confessedly later than that of the Gospel of this 
 writer. But the book of the Acts itself breaks off 
 suddenly, after relating the conclusion of the first 
 imprisonment of Paul in Rome, which is gene- 
 rally supposed to have terminated about the year of 
 Christ 65 or QQ\ that is to say, four or five years 
 before the capture of Jerusalem. The proof, then, 
 of the real antiquity of the prediction contained in 
 the Gospel of St. Luke, w411 turn upon the evidence 
 which we have of that of the book of the Acts. 
 Now, that this latter work was written very soon 
 after the occurrence of the last events which it 
 records, is obvious from the strongest internal evi- 
 dence. It is impossible to suppose that the writer 
 was acquainted with the interesting transactions 
 which subsequently to the above date marked the 
 few closing years of the life of the great apostle of 
 the Gentiles, when he composed this history, and 
 that he purposely abstained from relating them. 
 We may confidently, then, assume the date of this 
 production to have been that just now stated ; whilst, 
 for the actual authenticity of the work, as the genuine 
 production of one who himself witnessed the events 
 which he relates, we may at once appeal to one of 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 235 
 
 the ablest and most unanswerable arguments which 
 modern literature has produced. We know not, in 
 fact, how it is possible to escape from the demonstra- 
 tion afforded by Paley of the authenticity of the book 
 of the Acts of the Apostles, and of the Epistles of 
 St. Paul. But this proof, once established, extends 
 wider than the peculiar purpose, to establish which 
 that acute writer adduced it. These books, it should 
 be remembered, necessarily presuppose the existence 
 not of the Gospel of Luke only, but the authenticity 
 of at least a large portion of the miraculous facts 
 detailed by the other Evangelists, and of all the main 
 doctrines connected with the theory of our redemp- 
 tion. It is quite inconceivable that they should be 
 genuine, and that the histories to which they appear 
 uniformly to refer should be supposititious.* In fact, 
 
 * The following extracts from the general remarks subjoined bv the 
 fearned Dr. Laurence, the present Archbishop of Cashel, to his publica- 
 lion of the singular apocryphal work, " Ascensio Isaiae Vatis," contain so 
 ■strong a confirmation of ihe Aict of the implicit belief attached, within 
 the limits of the apostolical age itself, to one of the most frequently ques- 
 tioned |)reterwatural events recorded by the Evangelists, namely, the 
 miraculous conception of Christ, that we shall make no apology for their 
 length. 
 
 "From internal testimony, of a still more definite description, I con- 
 ceive that even the specific time of its composition (that of the work hero 
 alluded to) may be satisfactorily ascertained. It speaks only of one per- 
 •secution of Christians as taking place between the establishment of Chris- 
 tianity and the day of Judgment. This must, necessarily, have been the 
 persecution under Nero. Had the author lived so late a.s the reign of 
 Domitian, he would scarcely have limited the scene of Christian suffer- 
 ing to a single persecution, and have foretold the dissolution of all things 
 as shonly succeeding it. Nor, indeed, are we left to mere conjecture 
 relative to the particular persecution alluded to ; but demonstrable proof 
 -exists, that it could only have been the firs'. For Isaiah is introduced as 
 prophesying, that at its commencement, ' Berial shall descend, the mighty 
 angel, the prince of this world, which he has posses.sed from its creation. 
 He' shall descend from the firmament in the form of a man, an impious 
 /monarch, the murJerer of his mother ; in the lorm of him, the sove- 
 reign of the tcorld.'' Now, it is evident that the singular circumstance 
 here stated of the arch fiend Berial, possessing the body of " an impious 
 monarch, the murderer of his mother," is only applicable to Nero, who 
 is recorded to have stabbed his mother, Agripoina. But something more 
 precise still follows. For we are further told, that he shall have power 
 " three years, seven 'months, and twenty-seven days." The burning 
 of Rome took place on the 19th .June, a.d. G4. The crime of this con- 
 flagration, which excited universal abhorrence, Nero imputed to the 
 Chrtstianfi and from hence sprung the first persecution. Historians are 
 
236 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 from the first opening of the narrative of the Ner^ 
 Testament down to the time when the canon of the 
 Christian Scriptures was universally acknowledged 
 to be such as we now receive it, there is no one open 
 
 not agreed as to the exact time of its commencement. But Mosheim, 
 upon authority which he respects, fixes it to the month of November, 
 A.D. 64. If, then, we compute bacicwards to the death of Nero, which 
 happened upon June 9, a.d. 68, the period of three years, seven monthSf 
 and twenty-seven days, (considering the months as lunar, and the year 
 68 as a leap year,) we shall rind, that the day allotted to the commence- 
 ment of Berial's power falls upon the 30th day of October, a.d. 64 ; a 
 coincidence, I apprehend, sufficiently close to prove that the persecution 
 referred to must, indisputably, have been the nrst. 
 
 "The conclusion, then, will be, that our author wrote after the death 
 of Nero; that is, after June 9, a.d. 68. But the most striking circum- 
 stance still remains to be noticed. For, from what immediately follow^ 
 it appears, that although he must have written after the 9th of June, 
 A.D. 68, he must likewise have written before the close of the year 69. 
 In the very next verse but one to that, which relates the downfall of 
 Nero's tyranny, it is added, " After three hundred and thirty-two days 
 the Lord shaU come with his angels and holy powers, from the seventh 
 heaven, in iHe splendour of thatheaven and shall drag Berial and his 
 powers into Gehenna." And again, "Then shall the voice of the 
 Beloved rebuke in wrath the heaven, and the dry land, the mountains, 
 and the hills, the cities, and the deserts, the north, the angel of the 
 sun, the moon, and every thing where Berial has been seen and mani- 
 fested in this world. There shall also be a resurrection and judg- 
 ment in thoie days, while the Beloved shall cause to ascend from 
 him a fire to consume all the ungodly, who shall be as if they never 
 had been created." Had the work been written subsequently to the 
 three hundred and thirty-two days which followed the death of Nero, 
 the author of it could never, surely, have been absurd enough to fix 
 a time for the conclusion of the world, for the resurrection, and for 
 the day of Judgment, which time had a /ready elapsed ! In full persua- 
 sion that the Lord was indeed at hand, particularly after the bloodv 
 scenes of systematic torture which he had witnessed, he might, indeec^ 
 have ventured to predict the almost immediate advent of Christ to judg- 
 ment : but it is impossible to conceive, tliat in his sober senses he could 
 have referred the consummation of all things to a past period. It seems 
 certain, therefore, if the pren.ises from which I have argued be correct, 
 that the book must have been composed to»A^ards the close of the year 68, 
 or in the beginning of the year 69." 
 
 The Archbishop, after some further observations, proceeds to state : — 
 
 " I would remark, that in the work before us, the miraculous concep- 
 tion is distinctly and unequivocally asserted: which circumstance aflbrds 
 incontestrble proof, if my previous reasoning be correct, that the fact was 
 on record at no great distance of time from the period when St. Matthew's 
 Gospel itself is said bv Irenaeus to have been written. Indeed, the author 
 of the "Ascension of isaiah" seems to have borrowed the outline of his 
 narrative from that very Gospel. 
 
 "The Evanselist thus expresses 'himself: "When his mother, Mary, 
 was betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found 
 with child of the Holy Ghost. Then Joseph, her husband, was minded 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 237 
 
 interval, however short, in which we can, with the 
 slightest degree of probability, imagine the imposi- 
 tion of a set of forged documents upon mankind under 
 the form of authentic revelation. Some consider- 
 able period must always elapse before any unfounded 
 traditions could, under the most favourable circum- 
 stances, obtain any general belief. But the interval 
 which elapsed between the crucifixion of Christ and 
 that time when we find the early Christian writers 
 appealing to the Christian Scriptures, such as we noAV 
 possess them, with the most unsuspecting reliance 
 upon their authenticity, is much too short to admit, 
 with the remotest degree of probability, of this sup- 
 position. What possible combination of circum- 
 stances, for instance, could induce well-informed 
 Englishmen of the present day to receive implicitly 
 as true a series of forged documents, the production 
 of unknown persons, at some intermediate period, 
 which should positively assert that the most stupen- 
 dous miracles were publicly exhibited in London at 
 the time of the accession of the House of Hanover 
 to the British throne ; and could make them lay 
 down their live^ in confirmation of their belief? 
 
 to put her away privily." Our author relates the same occurrences, 
 almost in the same language : " I beheld a woman, by name Mary, who 
 toas a virgin, and betrothed to a man, by name Joseph. I saw, that 
 after she was betrothed she was found pregnant ; and that Joseph 
 was inclined to put her atoay." The latter part of the account is thus 
 related by the Evaniielist: "Then Joseph, being raised from sleep, did 
 as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife : 
 and knew her not till she had broughtforth her first-born son." With 
 a little variation, it is thus related by our author: " Then the Angel of 
 the Spirit appeared in the world ; after which Joseph did not put aioay 
 Mary, .... neither did he approach her, but preserved her as a 
 holy virgin^ notwithstanding her pregnancy." 
 
 "From a collation of these respective passages it must appear, I ap- 
 prehend, to every critic whose mind is not warped by theolog.cal preju- 
 dices, that the latter account was borrowed from the former. And if so, 
 it must be obvious, that the narrative of the miraculous conception extant 
 m all the manuscripts and veraions of St. Matthew's Gospel, was not a 
 subsequent interpolation, but an original part of that Gospel. Nor does 
 it seem less certain, that the same narrative was believed, as well by 
 Jewish as by Heathen converts, long before the termination of the first 
 century," &c. 
 
238 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 And yet the period is not so long from the date of 
 the crucifixion to the time when Justin Martyr wrote 
 his Apologies for Christianity, (works teeming with 
 direct quotations from the New Testament, as we 
 now receive it, and with incidental allusions to the 
 sen tim ents of those inspired writings, which show how 
 completely they had become part and parcel of his 
 opinions,) as it is from the accession of George I. to 
 the present day. If, however, the writings of the 
 New Testament be really authentic, then we must 
 •confidently assert of them, as w^e have already done 
 on a former occasion, of the histories of the Old 
 Testament, that they afford irrefragable proof of the 
 reality of the miracles which they relate. It is im- 
 possible that the books themselves could be contem- 
 poraneous with the times, the history of which they 
 profess to record, that they should have been received 
 as worthy of credit by the parties to whom they 
 were addressed, and yet, that matters of such palpa- 
 ble and accessible notoriety should have been falsely 
 stated in them. " For revealed religion," said Dr. 
 Johnson, a few days before his death, and the dying 
 declarations of such a man surely ought to carry 
 with them no small authority, " for revealed religion 
 there is such historical evidence as, upon any subject 
 not religious, would have left no doubt. Had the 
 facts recorded in the New Testament been mere civil 
 occurrences, no one would have called in question 
 the testimony by which they are established ; but the 
 importance annexed to them, amounting to nothing 
 less than the salvation of mankind, raises a cloud 
 in our minds, and creates doubts unknown upon any 
 other subject. With respect to evidence, we have 
 not such evidence that Csesar died in the capitol as 
 that Christ died in the manner related." 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON,. 
 
 CHAPTER XXVn. 
 
 Q^ the Evidence of the Truth of Revelation afforded by the low 
 Condition in Life, thf. absence of Literary Acquirements^ and the 
 impossibility of^ Confederacy in its respective Promulgators, 
 
 The character and condition in life of the iSrst 
 preachers of Christianity, and of revelation in general, 
 suggest, again, another argument in favour of the 
 truth of their doctrines, which it would perplex the 
 Infidel to overthrow. The following reply of Lac- 
 tarrtius, to the assertions of one of the early impugners 
 and persecutors of our faith, may be appositely applied, 
 not to the case of Peter and Paul only, but to that of 
 almost all the respective authors of the inspired books, 
 both Jewish and Christian. " Tantum abest a Divinis 
 literis repugilantia, quantum ille (adversarius vide- 
 licet) abfuit a veritate et fide. Prsecipue tamen 
 Paulum Petrumque laceravit ceterosque discipulos, 
 tanqxiam fallaciae seminatores, quos eosdem tamen 
 rudes et indoctos fuisse testatus est ; nam quosdam 
 eororm piscatorio artificio fecisse qua^stum : quasi 
 aegre ferret quod illam rem non Aristophanes aliquis 
 aut ArJstarchus comrmentatus sit. Abfuit ergo ab 
 his fingendi voluntas et astutia, quoniam rudes fue- 
 runt. Aut quis possit indoctus apta inter se et cohiE- 
 rentia fingere, quum philosophorum doctissimi Plato 
 et Aristoteles et Epicurus et Zcnon ipsi sibi repug- 
 nantia et contraria dixerint ? hsec est enim mendaci- 
 orum natura, ut cohaerere non possint. Illorum 
 autem traditio^ quia vera est, quadrat undique^ ac sibi 
 tola consentit ; et ideo persuadet quia constanti ra- 
 lione suffulta est." This observation, which carries 
 with it great weight, when directed to the various 
 component parts of Scripture individually, is per- 
 fectly unanswerable when applied to the entire and 
 consistent scheme of revelation as a whole. Seldom, 
 
240 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 if ever, is any one single impostor entirely accordant 
 with himself: a succession of impostors, writing at 
 separate and remote periods the one from the other, 
 cannot hy any possibility be so. And yet where, 
 from the fall of Adam downwards, to the final close 
 of the work of inspiration, can we detect one single 
 violation of unity of purpose in the theory of God's 
 interferences for the redemption of mankind, — 
 where point out one absent link from the chain of 
 connected consequences ? The whole is obviously the 
 grouping and calculated contrivance of one master- 
 mind. 
 
 Had the self-same tenets, with those promulgated 
 in Holy Writ, been first taught by any of the great 
 moral sages of Greece or Rome, it is evident that, 
 although that circumstance ought not in reality to 
 have operated against the value of their instructions, 
 it would certainly have suggested a plausible argu- 
 ment against the Divine authority attaching to them, 
 of which the sceptic would not have failed to take 
 advantage. No reason, it might have been said, can 
 be adduced to show that a first rate understanding, 
 taking into consideration all the anomalous features 
 of man's moral constitution, might not, by a lucky 
 accident, have lighted upon such a plausible vindica- 
 tion of God's Providence, in his dealings with the 
 human race, as the Christian theory supposes. The 
 great superiority of such a theory over those invented 
 by the several founders of the other great schools of 
 philosophy, it might hav*e been urged, no more proves 
 the Divine inspiration of its promulgator, than the 
 superior beauties of the works of Homer or Shak- 
 speare, to those of most other poets, Avould neces- 
 sarily oblige us to attribute their peculiar degree of 
 genius to a like Divine source. Undoubtedly it would 
 have been difficult to meet successfully objections of 
 this nature. As there is no assignable and definite 
 limit to the inventive powers of the human mind, it 
 is evident that the production of any one work, of 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 241 
 
 even unprecedented merit, by one individual, would 
 only be another and a new measure afforded us of 
 what the intellect of man can achieve, and would 
 supply no proof whatever that such individual was 
 inspired. But the whole canon of Scripture, as we 
 possess it, is a complete refutation of this objection 
 in every form in which it is capable of being put with 
 respect to the inspiration of the Bible. Nothing can, 
 it is true, be more entire and consistent with itself 
 than the scheme of revelation as a whole, but on the 
 other hand, it is equally certain that nothing can be 
 more seemingly desultory, can bear more positive 
 proofs of the absence of any thing like confederacy, or 
 be less set off by elaborate splendour of composition, 
 than the greater part of those writings through the 
 medium of which that revelation is conveyed. One 
 strong internal proof of the real inspiration attributa- 
 ble to the sacred authors, for instance, is the fact, that 
 many of them are not only known to have been 
 ignorant men in general, but also appear, on several 
 occasions, to have been perfectly unaware of the value 
 of the very facts which they were communicating. 
 With reference to one another, so far from appearing 
 to be united in a common combination to deceive, 
 they often seemingly, though perhaps never substan- 
 tially, contradict each other's statements, in minute 
 particulars, and sometimes even in momentous points 
 of doctrine. Not only do they not appear to wish to 
 theorize, but it may even be doubted how far many 
 of them, at the moment that their works were com- 
 posed, possessed any definite theory beyond that of 
 the single fact of the promised redemption of the 
 Israelitish people. In order to understand what 
 Christianity, in all its parts, really is, we must study 
 not one Gospel only, nor even the whole four Gos- 
 pels, but the entire book of the New Testament, from 
 the beginning to the end : and even then our conclu- 
 sions would be incomplete, as to its vast importance 
 and the elaborate contrivance of Providence for its 
 21 
 
242 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 production, unless we extend our researches back- 
 ward, from the last book of the Old Testament to the 
 very first page of Genesis itself. And yet among the 
 great multitude of writers whose respective compo- 
 sitions constitute that single and consistent work 
 which we call the Bible, only two individuals, namely, 
 Moses and Paul, could for a moment, under any 
 circumstances, be suspected of a tendency or disposi- 
 tion to set up what might justly be denominated a 
 system. But Moses, if he systematized at all, must 
 obviously have had an eye to the permanence of his 
 own institutions, and have striven more to establish 
 his own efficiency, as a legislator, than to act in the 
 capacity of a mere forerunner of a code of doctrines 
 by which his own' were to be eventually superseded : 
 — whilst, again, Paul, however disposed he may have 
 been to concentrate the facts and doctrines con- 
 nected with Christ's advent into one consistent series 
 of propositions, at all events came after those facts 
 upon which he builds his conclusions had already 
 taken place, and after the greater portion of those 
 doctrines had been promulged and commented upon 
 by others. 
 
 If, then, there is, as there assuredly seems to be, a 
 traceable consistency in Scripture, which marks the 
 agency and dictation of one predominating mind, it 
 certainly is not to the ostensible authors of its seve- 
 ral component parts that such consistency can be 
 referred. If their pens were so guided that each indi- 
 vidual performed exactly his own necessary share in 
 the construction of the work, and no more, and if, 
 without natural eloquence, without the acquirements 
 of literature, and without any of the known qualifica- 
 tions by which sages and legislators have been occa- 
 sionally enabled to impress a new character upon 
 society, these men have operated the greatest change 
 in human manners recorded in history, we must surely 
 look elsewhere than to themselves for the great 
 moving principle. It is in vain for us to examine the 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 243 
 
 Divine Scriptures with the fastidious eye of critics, 
 and to attempt to show that the work might have 
 been better and more systematically done. The best 
 answer to such objections is, that the work is done: 
 that the Bible has been the instrument, which has 
 rendered the manners of modern times, not excepting 
 those of many unbelievers themselves, more humane, 
 more polished, and ten thousand times more pure, 
 than those of the best periods of antiquity : and that 
 if, upon reference to the writings which have wrought 
 such wonders, we seem often to miss that elegance of 
 style and those nice accomplishments which mark 
 the highly-finished productions of professional men 
 of letters, it is, in fact, only one miracle the more, 
 and the more manifestly "the Lord's doing." 
 
 Those persons who are disposed to believe that 
 Providence has, from first to last, superintended 
 the developement and promulgation of Christianity, 
 taking care that the most important of all communi- 
 cations should be made as accessible as possible to the 
 whole human race, will probably be disposed to con- 
 sider the singular fact that the whole of the New 
 Testament has descended to us in the Greek and not 
 in the Aramaic language, as another internal proof 
 of the Divine benevolence and wisdom. Certain it 
 is, from the history of mankind subsequent to the 
 commencement of the Christian era, that no other lan- 
 guage would have supplied so universally convenient 
 a vehicle for the general transmission of truth as the 
 one which, for many centuries since the coming of 
 Christy was that of the predominant power of Europe, 
 and which is at this moment, as it is likely to con- 
 tinue to be, one of the foremost objects of the study 
 of men of letters throughout the civilized world. 
 
244 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 CHAPTER XXVIII. 
 
 Conclusion. 
 
 Returning, then, to the main proposition with 
 which Ave set out, we have no hesitation in asserting 
 that, setting aside all gratuitous theories of what we 
 might conceive the system of the universe possibly 
 to have been, had it pleased God so to arrange it, 
 and taking the actual acknowledged facts of human 
 nature as the foundation of the argument, there is an 
 appositeness and relevancy to our moral wants in the 
 scheme of revelation, such as we have received it, 
 which affords a strong, we might surely add, an 
 overpowering, evidence of its Divine origin. Were it 
 confessedly the suggestion of philosophical ingenuity, 
 it would probably be acknowledged by every class of 
 men to be by many degrees the most plausible con- 
 jecture in the records of literature ; whilst, as a matter 
 of practice, it is undoubtedly calculated to extirpate 
 more of the evil propensities of the heart, and to 
 develope, or, to speak more properly, to create a 
 greater capability of virtue than all the united ethical 
 theories which human ingenuity has produced. The 
 experiment has now been made for the space of nearly 
 eighteen centuries, and it may confidently be asserted 
 of it, that where fairly tried, it has invariably suc- 
 ceeded in raising the standard of civilization, and 
 promoting social and domestic happiness. It is no 
 argument against it to allege, as the infidels are in the 
 habit of doing, the miseries produced during the same 
 period of time by the malignant passions of mankind 
 under the assumed sanction of its name. None but 
 those who are already predisposed from other causes 
 to calumniate revelation, would venture to attach any 
 weight to such uncandid allegations. " The time 
 
WITH HUMAN BEASON. 245 
 
 Cometh that whosoever killelh you will think that he 
 doeth God service," was the prophetic remark of our 
 Saviour upon the abuses which he foresaw would one 
 day be perpetrated under the pretext of religion ; and 
 certain it is, that human cruelty seldom attains to so 
 acrimonious a perfection of bitterness as when con- 
 centrated and excited by the demoniacal spirit of 
 ignorant fanaticism. But the answer here is a short 
 and a plain one. Neither hatred, pride, ambition, 
 persecution, nor any other evil and carnal passion, 
 however plausibly disguised, can ever be otherwise 
 than directly opposed to the meek and unresisting^ 
 principles of the Gospel ; and precisely in the same 
 proportion in which any taint of such propensities 
 shall have at any time been found to have influenced 
 the conduct of otherwise sincere Christians, must they 
 be considered to have retrograded from their faith. 
 The fact is, that the history of strongly excited human 
 passion, be th« ostensible exciting motive what it will, 
 is almost invariably the history of human crime. 
 Never is the understanding less fitted to judge calmly 
 and, therefore, soundly, — never is the heart less 
 accessible to the complacent feeling of devotion in all 
 its overflowing tenderness of universal charity, than 
 when religion is made a war cry, or the rallying 
 signal of a party. In order to know the immense 
 degree of temporal good which the doctrines of the 
 Gospel have wrought, and are at this moment work- 
 ing in society, we must look, then, not to the glare 
 of public events, where, perhaps, a few great and 
 triumphant examples of unshaken rectitude of prin- 
 ciple afford a poor consolation to the spectator for the 
 general scene of wretchedness and wickedness Avhich 
 he is compelled to witness, but to the noiseless 
 retirement of domestic life ; to those unobtrusive 
 circles in which the Christian virtues, as they are 
 expelled one by one from the arena of worldly clam- 
 our, take their final refuge. To this surest and most 
 unfailing test, every sincere believer will confidently 
 21* 
 
846 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 appeal for the evidences of the soundness of those 
 principles which he acknowledges, against the taunts 
 of the unbeliever. He will point to the abode of 
 those whom the world deems unfortunate, but who 
 are inwardly conscious of possessing a treasure which 
 they would not exchange for all the external pros- 
 perity of those who despise them ; to the bedchamber, 
 of the invalid, who cheerfully recognises the hand of 
 a father and benefactor in the stroke which chastises 
 him; to traits of feminine and almost infantine hero- 
 ism, in comparison of which the legends of Pagan 
 antiquity fade away into nothing; and, as a case not 
 less in point, to the jaded feelings of the worn out 
 votary of wealth or amhition, who has at length 
 begun to perceive the vanity of all human pursuits, 
 excepting that of the one thing, w^hich in the sunny 
 season of life he had contemptuously overlooked. 
 The healing operation of the Gospel principles upon 
 all the weaknesses and infirmities and irritations to 
 which our nature is subject, cannot^ Ave repeat, he the 
 result of mere accident. There must be something in 
 them of Divine contrivance, some relevancy, how- 
 ever inexplicable, to the constitution of our hearts and 
 understanding. Falsehood and imposture are in their 
 very nature so repugnant to the general well-being 
 of mankind, and to our necessary apprehensions of 
 the Divine attributes, that to suppose them capable 
 of producing all the effects of the holiest truths, not 
 only in this or that instance, but in every department 
 and under every possible modification of society, 
 would be the greatest of absurdities. If it is alleged, 
 in reply to this observation, that Christianity is only 
 so far beneficial in its effects upon the human heart, 
 inasmuch as it comprehends all the principles of 
 natural religion, to the excellence and Divine origin 
 of which the sceptic professes to assent equally with 
 ourselves, our answer is, that we deny that mere 
 natural religion can produce the result now described. 
 We do not pretend nor wish to undervalue the prin- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 247 
 
 ciples of sound theism so far as ihey will go. They 
 constitute, we admit, integral portions of the truth, 
 but still, we assert, that they are not the whole truth ; 
 and we would add, also, that the points in which 
 they are defective are those very points in which the 
 weakness of human nature most earnestly requires 
 their help. In every thing that has reference to the 
 position of man with respect to his Creator, to the 
 peculiar difficulties connected with the undoubted 
 phenomena of the Divine government, and every 
 most earnest wish and want of the human heart, we 
 must have recourse solely and exclusively to the 
 peculiar doctrines of Christianity. The moral anoma- 
 lies which, in the midst of an astonishingly beautiful 
 material creation, we cannot but observe around us, 
 suggest the antagonist propositions against which the 
 Gospel revelations are placed in direct counteraction. 
 In admitting, then, the fact of the existence of the 
 former, it would seem impossible, if we would vindi- 
 cate to our reasons the ways»of Providence, to deny 
 the reality of the latter. Why, then, has this splen- 
 did doctrine been received with so much haughty 
 superciliousness, not to say with so much virulence 
 of hostility, as we know that it has been received, by 
 men of high acquirements in literature, and even 
 sometimes of correct moral habits ? The Gospel 
 itself will supply the answer, " that its kingdom is 
 not of this world ;" that it is not a mere ingenious 
 theory, in discussing which philosophical minds may 
 exercise their acuteness, but that it is a practical, 
 and often a painful, course of moral discipline, entail- 
 ing upon its professors no slight degree of self- 
 restraint, and the abjuration of no small proportion 
 of the more immediate attractions of this life. Nor 
 is this all. Calculated, as it really is, to meet and 
 satisfy our most urgent moral wants, still the truth 
 of this fact is far, very far, from being prominently 
 evident to all classes of persons. The patient requires 
 to be satisfied of tiie existence of the malady before 
 
248 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 he calls in the aid of the physician. But such are the 
 distractions of society, and so numerous the occupa- 
 tions which divert us from the habit of deep spiritual 
 reflection, that the interior of their own breasts 
 remains to the last an unexplored region to the greater 
 portion of mankind. Let them, indeed, take the 
 trouble of tracing consequence after consequence as 
 they arise in necessary succession, from the acknow- 
 ledged principles of universal morals, and we have 
 no doubt that the uniform result to most minds would 
 be, a disposition to hail the communications of reve- 
 lation as bearing the decisive stamp of authenticity. 
 But this is a trouble which fev/ individuals imagine 
 that they have leisure, and still fcAver find that they 
 have the disposition, to undertake. To such men, 
 accordingly, Christianity comes as medicine tendered 
 to the sound, or the solution of an enigma to those 
 who are not conscious of the difficulty. Its first 
 impression, therefore, upon them is, that of its being 
 something superfluous, 'which they may well afford 
 to do without, and which, therefore, would argue a 
 meddlesome pertinacity in those who would anxiously 
 direct their attention to it. 
 
 The long continued operation of miracles, also, 
 of which the Bible requires our belief, and the tran- 
 scendental mysteries which it inculcates as matters 
 of faith, though involving no real improbability, if 
 rightly considered, must be confessed to be well cal- 
 culated to startle most persons, who come for the 
 first time to the consideration of its evidences. In 
 order fully to appreciate the physical difficulty which 
 €ven the most intelligent and well regulated minds 
 must have felt, to conquer their prepossession against 
 revelation, occasioned by the detail of preternatural 
 occurrences which it records, it will be proper, before 
 we conclude, to revert once more to the notice of one 
 of those instinctive operations of our minds, with 
 respect to the existence of which, as we have before 
 .observed, all metaphysicians appear to be agreed. 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 249 
 
 The operation alluded to has been already stated to 
 be that by which, prior to, and independently of, all 
 systematic reasoning, we derive our belief in the 
 permanency and inviolability of the ordinary laws 
 of nature from the simple fact of our own past per- 
 sonal experience. It has been often and often re- 
 peated by those persons who have most studied the 
 phenomena of the human mind, that in consequence 
 of our inability to trace any connexion between cause 
 and effect, we can have no possible ground for anti- 
 cipating the recurrence of any, the most natural 
 incident, beyond that of our recollection of the uni- 
 formity of its past occurrence under analogous cir- 
 cumstances. Such are the stran»;e processes by which 
 we reason, that this axiom, which in fact supplies the 
 strongest theoretical argument in favour of what we 
 should deem miracles, (inasmuch as it would show 
 that, for any thing we know to the contrary, any 
 result whatever may be the result of any antecedent 
 operation,) still affords, practically, the most power- 
 ful though not the most sound, presumption against 
 them. " Such and such things happen in a certain 
 order; therefore they will always so happen." This 
 is, perhaps, the first general maxim at which the 
 human mind, in the commencement of life, arrives. 
 No doubt Providence has wisely contrived, not only 
 that every man, but probably, that every animal 
 endued with consciousness, in order that it may be 
 enabled to procure its own subsistence, should have 
 a necessary and instinctive impression, that certain 
 effects will invariably result from certain causes. 
 But it is obvious that this conclusion is the result 
 of no legitimate process of ratiocination. **'It is 
 impossible," says Hume, " that this inference of the 
 (brute) animal can be founded on any process of 
 argument or reasoning, by which he concludes, that 
 like events must follow like objects, and that the 
 course of nature will always be regular in its opera- 
 tions* For if there be, in reality, any arguments of 
 
250 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 this nature, they surely lie too abstruse for the obser- 
 vation of such imperfect understandings; since it 
 may well employ the utmost care and attention of a 
 philosophic genius to discover and observe them. 
 Animals, therefore, are not guided in these inferences 
 hy reasoning; neither are children: neither are the 
 generality of mankind, in their ordinary actions and 
 conclusions : neither are philosophers themselves^ who, 
 in all the active parts of life, are, in the main, the 
 same with the vulgar, and are governed by the same 
 maxims. Nature must have provided some other 
 principle, of more ready and more general use and 
 application ; nor can an operation of such immense 
 consequence in life as that of inferring effects from 
 causes be trusted to the uncertain process of reason- 
 ing and argumentation. Were this doubtful with 
 regard to men, it seems to admit of no question with 
 regard to the brute creation ; and the conclusion 
 being once firmly established in the one, we have a 
 strong presumption, from all the rules of analogy, 
 that it ought to be universally admitted without any 
 exception or reserve. It is custom alone whicn 
 engages animals, from every object that strikes their 
 senses, to infer its usual attendant, and carries their 
 imagination, from the appearance of the one, to con- 
 ceive the other in that particular manner which we 
 denominate belief. No other explanation can be 
 given of this operation, in all the higher as well as 
 lower classes of sensitive beings which fall under 
 our notice and observation."* Without this power- 
 ful association here stated, it would undoubtedly be 
 impossible for us not only to provide for coming 
 occurrences, but even duly to avail ourselves of the 
 present blessings which the bounty of the Creator has 
 spread before us. The sceptical philosopher, however, 
 from whose writings the above extract is made, has 
 attached so much importance to this fact, that upon 
 
 • Jlurnk's Essay on the Reason of Animals, 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 251 
 
 it, that is to say, upon our presumed incapability of 
 believing any thing which is contrary to our' uniform 
 past experience, he has built his celebrated dictum, 
 that " no testimony whatever is sufficient to establish 
 a miracle." It is, to be sure, somewhat inconsistent, 
 in a statement thus undoubtedly promulgated, that 
 this bold proposition should be admitted by its pro- 
 pounder to be founded, as is above seen, upon no 
 necessary, nor even probable, inference of the reason; 
 but to be a mere consequence of the arbitrary con- 
 struction of the mind; and that he should allow, 
 almost in the same breach, that no, however porten- 
 tous deviation from the general order of events, in- 
 dependently of that instinctive association, ought, 
 properly, to excite in us any surprise whatever. 
 *' The bread," says he, " which I formerly ate, nour- 
 ished me ; that is, a body of such sensible qualities 
 was, at that time, endued with such secret poAvers. 
 But does it follow that other bread must also nourish 
 me at another time, and that like sensible qualities 
 must always be attended with the like secret powers? 
 The consequence seems nowise necessary. ^^*^ "What is 
 this admission, then, but that there is nothing in 
 what we should grant to be a real miracle, that is to 
 say, a decided deviation from seemingly established 
 cause and effect, which, in strict reason, ought to sur- 
 prise us? But such contradictions are, perhaps, to 
 be expected the moment that we launch into the 
 region of metaphysical abstractions. In a certain 
 sense, however, the sincerest Christian believer will 
 readily' grant the greater part, though, assuredly, he 
 will not assent to the entire whole, of the foregoing 
 assertions. He will cheerfully acknowledge, with 
 Hume, that knowing really nothing of the necessary 
 connexion of causation, we have no reason, theoret- 
 ically, for supposing any miracle whatever (using 
 that word in its commonly received acceptation) to 
 
 ' Hume's ^^^JjjJ^^I llll^^ 
 
 OB* 
 
252 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 be really impossible : but he will also allow, because 
 it is what every reasonable person must feel, that the 
 natural, an^ almost necessary presumption of our 
 minds is, that the order of nature, such as we know 
 it from experience to be, is, as a general rule, fixed 
 and permanent. It is obvious, however, and should 
 never be forgotten, that, whilst the former of these 
 propositions is a direct inference from the principles 
 of sound and laborious reasoning, the latter is. an 
 inert and involuntary animal impression only. We 
 believe in it, because we find ourselves, from the 
 constitution of our nature, impelled to do so; but we 
 can assign no other reason for it than that God, for 
 wise, practical, but secondary purposes, has so dis- 
 posed us. The fact is, that the moment that we 
 examine this last axiom^ the more we find our- 
 selves obliged to question its philosophical accuracy. 
 Nothing, assuredly, can be more experimentally cer- 
 tain, than that the phenomena of nature have not 
 always been what they are this moment. And 
 yet we can no more conceive the fact of a creation 
 of the universe, or that of the first production of any 
 single plant or animal, than we can any of the most 
 Astounding miracles of Scripture. Such occurrences 
 are certainly equally opposed, with those last mention- 
 ed, to our daily and uniform experience, and therefore, 
 according to Hume's argument, ought to be equally 
 revolting to the understanding. But with regard to 
 those former facts, they are as certain and demon- 
 strable as any the best attested occurrences of our 
 own times. That such things have been, is no longer 
 a doubt with the most hardened and pertinacious 
 sceptic. But if so, there is assuredly no reason why 
 "we should stop at this point, and, having admitted 
 the uncertainty of the test of mere experience thus 
 far, should deny that the same argument may be 
 legitimately extended much further. 
 
 Though, however, such an inference would seem 
 to b© nothing more than what is strictly reasonable* 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 253 
 
 Still, we repeat, the blind and instinctive impression 
 of the human mind is on the other side. All persons 
 whatever in their ordinary, and the greater proportion 
 of mankind in their permanent, habits, are startled 
 and offended by any assertion of the reality of what, 
 in common language, and under common circum- 
 stances, would be deemed impossibilities. The 
 ignorant no less than the learned can say what is 
 accordant with, or contrary to, their personal experi- 
 ence, and by far the greater portion of mankind, 
 whether ignorant or learned, will reason no further. 
 It requires, in fact, no small degree of the power of 
 philosophical abstraction, to perceive that many things 
 which by the vulgar are considered as impossibilities, 
 are not only possible but necessary inferences from 
 undoubted premises. Until, however, this truth be 
 made not only demonstrable, but familiar to the 
 mind, a prejudice against the wonders related in 
 Scripture must ever, to a certain degree, exist in the 
 breasts of even the devout and well-disposed, whilst 
 the same facts will be exultingly selected from the 
 general context of revelation, by the thoughtless and 
 profane, as triumphant proofs of the credulity of the 
 single-minded, and the utter incredibility of the whole 
 theory of our faith. But the influential causes, to 
 which we must attribute the widely extending indif- 
 ference amongst worldly men with respect to evan- 
 gelical truth, do not terminate here. Christianity, 
 we should recollect, in addition to its being exposed 
 in limine to the strong involuntary objection above 
 alluded to, finds also a still more formidable, because 
 a far less innocent, predisposition of the human mind 
 arrayed against it, from the many sacrifices of pre- 
 sumed personal convenience it requires, and the 
 difficult course of spiritual discipline which it would 
 enforce. Here, again, every metaphysician will tell 
 us, that, independently of the moral disqualification 
 which licentious habits create for the perception of 
 the intrinsic beauty of true holiness, another objeo 
 ''>5 
 
254 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 tion to its reception occurs, founded like the former 
 rather upon the mechanism and original constitution 
 of our minds, than upon real exercise of the reason- 
 ing powers. The first and instinctive impulse of 
 every person, not with respect to religious questions 
 only, but in all the common transactions of life, is to 
 believe rather what he wishes to be true, than what 
 actually is so. This impression, an unreasonable 
 and a mischievous one no doubt, suggests itself un- 
 called for, and, in nine cases out of ten, influences 
 the choice and moulds the opinions of the average 
 members of society ; whilst, on the other hand, that 
 strength of mind, which, setting passion and prejudice 
 apart, withholds its judgment till it has found sub- 
 stantial reasons on which to found an inference, is 
 attained with difficulty, and consequently falls to the 
 lot of comparatively few. Tn no case, however, per- 
 haps, does the above-mentioned unreasoning preju- 
 dice operate more widely than in that of the forma- 
 tion of our religious opinions. A business-like, cal- 
 culating, and money-making community, do not 
 readily turn aside from their favourite course in pur- 
 suit of inquiries of this nature, where no immediate 
 worldly advantage is at hand to reward their labour. 
 So long, accordingly, as they can keep the momen- 
 tous questions of revelation at a distance, and by so 
 doing can contrive to know no more of it than that it 
 requires their belief in prodigies perfectly unlike to 
 any thing which has ever occurred within their own 
 knowledge, whilst they feel also that its entire adop- 
 tion Avould stand in the way of that self-indulgence 
 to which the corrupt human heart is so naturally 
 prone, religious belief in the full, strict, evangelical 
 sense of the term, must to them be really impossible. 
 Public decorum, and an idea that a professed defer- 
 ence to the established worship of the country is 
 required of them as citizens, may procure their external 
 assent to its forms ; and so long as that natural sense 
 of the rules of morality, which the Christian revela- 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 255 
 
 tion has so much heightened and improved, even in 
 the case of those Avho deny its evidences, continues 
 to supply a general standard for their conduct, they 
 may pass through life perhaps not only plausibly, but 
 really usefully, as members of the social community. 
 Examples, however, such as these can never be quoted 
 as a realization of the blessed effects wrhich Chris- 
 tianity was intended to produce among the human 
 race. 
 
 We should form a very inadequate notion of the 
 value of the Gospel, were we to suppose that it had 
 completed its work when it had smoothed the rough 
 exterior of public manners, and, having inculcated a 
 certain series of moral maxims much too refined and 
 unearthly for the mere worldly mind to adopt, as a 
 rule of practice, or even to appreciate, that it has 
 left human nature as cold and as incapable of holy 
 aspirations as it found it. That stupendous dispen- 
 sation is assuredly, if true, far, very far, too elaborate 
 an arrangement of Providence to rest contented with 
 this humble result. It is either something vastly 
 superior to every possible worldly object, or it is 
 nothing. No reasonable Christian, any more than any 
 other reasonable person, believes gratuitously, unne- 
 cessarily, and from a natural predisposition, in mira- 
 cles. He knows, he sees as clearly as Hume or any 
 other sceptic, that God never disturbs the established 
 order of his own works, but for some truly extraor- 
 dinary and paramount object. If, then, notwithstand- 
 ing this original bias to the contrary, the overpower- 
 ing force of external and internal evidence obliges 
 him to admit that such preternatural interpositions 
 have really taken place ; and if he finds that the 
 choice between assent and unbelief is after all a choice 
 of difficulties, and yet that upon due and cautious 
 examination he cannot but admit that the affirmative 
 side of the question is, beyond comparison, the most 
 probable, still the very feeling of amazement with 
 which he concludes his inquiry leaves him under an 
 
256 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 awe-Struck impression of the infinite importance of 
 the mysterious truths thus forced upon his conviction. 
 
 What, then, is the reasonable, the only conclusion, 
 to Virhich he can arrive ? That he cannot, consistently 
 with any rule of sound argument, any more than 
 conformably with what he conceives to be the un- 
 equivocal language of revelation, make common cause 
 with the Unitarian, the Socinian, or the Arian. He 
 feels that he has no alternative but that of receiving 
 Scripture as a whole, or of rejecting it as a whole. 
 He sees no diminution of the difficulty, if, discarding 
 as human superadditions the larger portion of the 
 recorded miracles of Holy Writ, he is compelled by 
 the cogency of proof to retain any. Granting the 
 reality of one, whether that one be the miracle of 
 inspiration, the miracle of prophecy, or the miracle of 
 the transmutation of natural objects, he knows that 
 he has conceded the great question at issue, and that 
 henceforward there remains no other point at which 
 he can reasonably stop in the course of his admis- 
 sions, than the full boundary line of Scripture itself. 
 
 But if he receive the whole of what we are taught 
 to acknowledge as God's word, it will, then, assuredly 
 be to him as the most stupendous and most excellent 
 of God's gifts. It will strictly be his "Emmanuel, 
 God with us." It will identify him in interests and 
 in feeling with every thing, however noble and tran- 
 scendental, which his imagination can conceive, or to 
 which his most rapturous wishes can aspire. It will 
 open all heaven before him, because he will know 
 that the price of heaven has already been paid on his 
 account ; and it will scale and purge his eyesight 
 with regard to every thing connected with the earth. 
 It will inculcate no fanaticism, no ascetic mortifi- 
 cations, no contemptuous disregard or hard-hearted 
 suppression of the charities of social and domestic 
 life ; for such are the false deductions of a morose 
 human philosophy, following up its own harsh and 
 narrow principles under the influence of superstitious 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 257 
 
 terror and unenlightened reason. But he will, not- 
 withstanding, learn to see every thing in its proper 
 proportions, and in its true colours. He will think 
 less of this world, only because he will think of hea- 
 ven the more; but his dealings with mankind will 
 be in all fervour of affection, and cheerfulness, and 
 guileless simplicity of heart. He will love man, 
 because the principle of his religion is love, and 
 because he knows that for the sake of man his gra- 
 cious Redeemer quitted heaven and became a so- 
 journer and an outcast upon earth ; and he will love 
 God with an intensity of which every other modifica- 
 tion of religious belief is incapable, because no other 
 religion teaches that our Creator has done for us 
 what the Gospel assures us that he has done. Need 
 we, then, ask the superfluous question whether Chris- 
 tianity, thus considered and thus adopted, will make 
 him wiser and better? and if such be the certain 
 result of its adoption, need we again ask whether 
 that system of belief is really from God? " By their 
 fruits ye shall know them," is the infallible criterion 
 to which every Christian believer will confidently 
 appeal in vindication of the hope which is in him : 
 being fully assured that those tenets must be founded 
 upon an immoveable basis of truth, the necessary 
 consequence of which is to afford the best, or rather 
 the only, explanation of the mysteries of God's Provi- 
 dence, and, whilst it kills in their first growth every 
 germinating principle of vice, to develope a capability 
 of spiritual holiness in man, of the possibility of 
 which mere human reason could not have afforded 
 us the slightest conception. 
 
 In the preceding dissertation an attempt has been 
 
 made to give a summary sketch of the entire system 
 
 of revelation, by tracing the converging tendency of 
 
 its various integral parts from first to last, as they 
 
 22* 
 
258 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 unite to form one consistent design, and terminate in 
 the establishment of a few most momentous proposi- 
 tions. The execution of the design has, from the 
 extensive nature of the subject, been necessarily 
 general and superficial : still, however, the mode of 
 treating it here pursued will not, it is trusted, be 
 without its use to many persons (whether coming 
 under the denomination of believers or sceptics) 
 whose attention may not have been accustomed to 
 consider the uniformity of plan which appears to 
 pervade the whole of God's dealings with mankind, 
 should they, and more especially should the latter, 
 be disposed to afford to it a small portion of their 
 consideration. To readers of the former description 
 it cannot, to say the least, be otherwise than bene- 
 ficial, to acquire the habit of taking larger and more 
 comprehensive views than they have yet done of the 
 subject matter of their belief, and of thus confirming 
 their previous impression of the truth of the various 
 component doctrines of their religion, by observing 
 how impossible it is to rest any of them singly and 
 severally from its general contexture without the 
 dislocation of the whole, and in fact without over- 
 turning the very fundamental principles of natural 
 theology itself. In this respect the design of the 
 comprehensive survey of the theory of Christianity 
 here attempted will bear some resemblance to that of 
 the blank outline maps which we place in the hands 
 of young students in geography, by the aid of which 
 the grouping and relative connexion of the several 
 districts are rendered more easy of apprehension, 
 than would be the case were they to commence by 
 entangling themselves in minute questions of detail. 
 In theology more especially, and more markedly than 
 in other pursuits, an acquaintance with the actual 
 location of a principle in the system of which it 
 forms a part, is absolutely necessary for the purpose 
 of its proper elucidation. A difliculty which would 
 be insuperable when considered as a detached propo- 
 
'^9»mitUm ■ » "liiP 
 
 W^TH HUMAN REASON. 259 
 
 sition, often assumes the character of an obvious and 
 necessary inference, when viewed in its proper posi- 
 tion as a member of a connected series of correlative 
 axioms. 
 
 With the sceptic, again, the appeal here made to 
 principles recognised by himself, and to the test of 
 uniform experience, may, it is hoped, operate as an 
 inducement to commence a further and more elaborate 
 examination, in all its minuter details, of the great 
 question at issue, upon which he is imperatively 
 urged by every principle of duty, interest, and sober 
 reason, to return an impartial verdict. It is an ob- 
 vious truth, that with the active business-like man 
 of the world, the dogmatical inculcation of insulated 
 doctrinesof religion, however vital in themselves, and 
 however really substantiated by strong external evi- 
 dence, rarely succeeds. To minds thus preoccupied 
 by the speculations of the passing hour, the mysteri- 
 ous dicta of our faith necessarily announce them- 
 selves with an air of paradox, when presented one 
 by one, without reference to the other truths which 
 ought to precede or accompany them. Abstract and 
 impalpable doctrines are never accepted by us will- 
 ingly, nor considered impartially, where no previous 
 moral habits predispose us for their reception, and 
 no strongly marked semblance of probability gives 
 them an urgent claim upon our attention. Of all 
 subjects of intellectual research, accordingly, that of 
 theology, if we would ground our faith upon immove- 
 able principles, requires the widest process of induc- 
 tion and the most thorough investigation of the indu- 
 bitable principles of our own nature, and of the 
 general laws of God's moral government. Partial, 
 desultory, and confined views, whilst they present an 
 almost insurmountable stumbling-block in the path 
 of the sceptic, afford also an unsafe resting-place for 
 the faith of even the best disposed Christian believer. 
 It is only after a long and continuous effort of the 
 understanding that the mist which envelopes these 
 
260 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 transcendental questions gradually disperses, and we 
 begin to perceive clearly, how, by the intimate inter- 
 lacement of doctrine with doctrine, the great truths 
 of revelation mutually aid and support one another. 
 When the mind, by habitual contemplation, has 
 become thoroughly familiarized with the wonders of 
 the spiritual world, then, and not till then, the neces- 
 sity not only of believing something, but of believing 
 what, if broadly stated to the indolent and indifferent, 
 will appear to be a degree of gratuitous credulity, 
 forces itself irresistibly on the conviction. 
 
 It is on this account that the singular intellectual 
 character of the age in which we live must tend to 
 fill every well-wisher to the cause of religion and to 
 mankind with feelings of anxiety, if not of alarm. 
 This observation is not made from any disposition to 
 augur altogether unfavourably of those habits of 
 mental enterprise which mark the present day. Con- 
 vinced, as we are, that the rapid movement which is 
 now taking place in the course of events is part of 
 that progressive system which the wisdom of Pro- 
 vidence has destined to lead to the ultimate benefit 
 of his creatures, we cannot doubt but that there 
 exists, somewhere or other, in the busy scene around 
 us, a sanative principle, which will deaden the energy 
 of much of that moral poison which at present seems 
 so copiously to infect the stream of science. It is the 
 almost exclusively earthly tendency of the intellec- 
 tual pursuits of the existing generation, and not the 
 pursuits themselves, which we fear and deprecate. 
 The evils resulting from the abuse of knowledge are 
 not, indeed, peculiar to our own age. So long as the 
 heart of man continues to be what it is, intelligence, 
 like every other power, will as often be converted 
 into a principle of mischief as of benefit. Be the 
 favourite science of the moment what it may, it will, 
 according to the opposite views of individuals, afford 
 implements for the attack, no less than arguments 
 for the defence, of religion. A century ago, when 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 261 
 
 the comparative stagnation of the pubh'c mind, by 
 the greater degree of leisure which accompanied it, 
 impressed upon our literature a more abstracted and 
 visionary character than that which attaches to the 
 more practical studies of our present men of letters, 
 metaphysical studies, the legitimate pursuit of which 
 may be numbered among the most effective auxilia- 
 ries of sound theology, supplied, as is well known, 
 some of the most powerful aids to the genius of infi- 
 delity. A science which, as if by the touch of a 
 magician, could make the whole material universe, 
 as it were, disappear from 'our view, leaving to us 
 nothing but thin and impalpable abstractions in its 
 place, and which by attempting to explain the origin 
 and growth of our ideas, and even the nature and 
 constitution of the human soul, could contrive to 
 render the fundamental axioms of Theism and mo- 
 rality equivocal in the conceptions of the half-inform- 
 ed, was naturally laid hold of with eagerness, as an 
 excuse for their unbelief, by those persons whose 
 unaspiring object it was to confine the whole scope 
 ard energy of our spiritual faculties within the nar- 
 row boundaries of this world's business. The delu- 
 sion was strong whilst it lasted, but, like all other 
 systems of unsubstantial philosophy, was no less 
 transient. The age of unprofitable, and often of 
 mischievous, idealism is now gone by, and has left 
 little behind it to attract and interest the present 
 generation, except the recollection of undecided con- 
 troversies, and a few plausible ill-confirmed con- 
 jectures. The tendency of the literature of our own 
 times is, unfortunately, in some important respects, 
 of a directly contrary description. If the mysteries 
 of the immaterial world were formerly ransacked 
 with a petulant and profane curiosity, the fault now 
 lies in the opposite extreme. With a strong dislike 
 to every thing approaching to the reveries of abstrac- 
 tion, and, in fact, to every thing which does not con- 
 tribute its share to the business of the passing 
 
262 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 moment, the public sentiment has adopted a con- 
 temptuous tone with respect to the merely contem- 
 plative sciences which inclines us occasionally to 
 look back almost with regret to the visionary studies 
 of our forefathers. If metaphysical pursuits did 
 nothing more than give us more accurate notions of 
 the real conditions of actual existence, and show us 
 how unlike our sensible and bodily perceptions are 
 to the mysterious and inaccessible objects which they 
 represent, they would, when duly cultivated, form no 
 unimportant preparative for the discussion of the 
 abstruse questions of theology. But it is rarely that 
 we are content thus to travel the middle and the 
 safest path. There is an exclusiveness in the tastes 
 of the human faculties which seldom contents itself 
 with the mere preference of one course of study to 
 another. The occupation of the moment must be as 
 every thing to us, and every other mode of mental 
 exercise as nothing. What Cicero so justly remarked 
 of the dangerous tendency of the epicurean doctrines, 
 namely, that by discussing too exclusively the pro- 
 perties of material objects, they almost, of necessity, 
 overlooked those spiritual entities the existence of 
 which they professed to acknowledge, may afford a 
 salutary hint to those persons Avho can anticipate no 
 danger to the cause of religion from that eager atten- 
 tion to secular concerns which marks the times in 
 which we live. " Cum in rerum natura duo quae- 
 renda sint, unum, quae materia sit ex qua quaeque res 
 efficiatur ; alterum, quae vis sit quae quidque efficiat, 
 de materifi disseruerunt, inm et causam efficiendi reli- 
 querunty It is not, we trust, speaking uncharitably, 
 to assert, that at the present moment, those sciences, 
 which have for their immediate object the investiga- 
 tion of material objects, have got more than their due 
 ascendency in general estimation ; and whilst that 
 state of things continues, infidelity of a certain kind 
 must be the necessary fconsequence. Infidelity, we 
 say, of a certain kind ; for that to which we allude is 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 263 
 
 rather the negative unbelief resulting from indolence, 
 inattention, preoccupation, worldly views, and a 
 general distaste for the abstractions of speculative 
 research, than that of an elaborate and well-digested 
 system. The world, is at present, as little disposed 
 to lend an attentive ear to the metaphysical Atheist 
 as to the metaphysical Christian polemic. The infi- 
 delity, therefore, which we have reason to dread, is 
 more that of pampered and selfish internal sentiment 
 than that of open profession. The name of Christian 
 may not be disavowed as a generic appellation, but 
 the pure and high-minded feeling to which that de- 
 signation in strictness belongs would probably be 
 found to exist in far too weak a degree in the breasts 
 of a large portion of the active members of society at 
 present, to supply them with that energetic spirit of 
 resistance which is necessary to enable them to com- 
 pete successfully with the wordly tendencies too 
 natural to us all. 
 
 Few states of mind are, perhaps, less accessible to 
 conviction, in theological matters, than that which is 
 characterized by the languor and indifference now 
 described. The speculative student, who loves to 
 launch into the thin impalpabilities of the ideal 
 world, in order to make his meditations substantially 
 useful, requires only that the current of his thoughts 
 should be turned in the proper direction, and that he 
 should possess the soundness of principle necessary 
 to enable him to bestow upon each respective propo- 
 sition its fitting and impartial examination. Mean- 
 while, his habitual intercourse with spiritual things 
 supplies a proper training to fit him for the appre- 
 hension of religious topics. But the mind of the 
 professed utilitarian presents scarcely a single point 
 of approach for the arguments of the theologian. 
 Address to it singly the various constituent doctrines 
 of revelation, and they are instantaneously rejected 
 as resting upon little and equivocal external proof, 
 and unsupported \fy any collateral probabilities. Call 
 
264 CONSISTENCY OF RETELATION 
 
 its attention to the theory and consistency of our 
 religion as a whole, and we challenge it to an inquiry 
 for which, as requiring an elaborate experimental 
 survey of all the multifarious circumstances of our 
 nature, it can afford neither sufficient time nor per- 
 severance. Such is the practical state of unbelief of 
 an active era like the present, which is the more 
 difficult to deal with, because, having no professed 
 theory of scepticism, there is no peculiar train of 
 argument more especially adapted to command its 
 notice. And yet we may confidently assert, that if 
 society is destined to escape from the dislocation 
 which threatens it, from the singular state of excite- 
 ment which, from a combination of causes, pervades, 
 at present, the whole civilized world, it will neither 
 be the labour of the legislator, nor the ingenuity of 
 the secular philosopher, but the corrective spirit of 
 religion, in other words, the kindly, the humble, the 
 self-denying principles of Christianity, which must 
 accomplish the object. 
 
 There is something necessarily solemn, under any 
 circumstances, in the idea of vast political commu- 
 nities, moving rapidly forward even in the course of 
 legitimate improvement ; but the feeling must be one 
 of terror, if we have reason to believe that the great 
 cement of the social system, the only effective bond 
 of union between the discordant elements of human 
 passion, is wanting at the very moment when its 
 presence is most needful. At such a crisis all may 
 look well for a short period of time, but the slightest 
 agitation may, in an instant, disperse the whole 
 intricate machinery into unseemly fragments. We 
 speak seriously, and from the deepest conviction, 
 when we say, that such is the kind of alarm which 
 the existing aspect of society is calculated to suggest. 
 With true piety for our load-star, and brotherly love 
 and forbearance for our principle of action, we feel 
 confident, not only that all may, but that all will, be 
 well. No friend to mankind can wish the human 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 265 
 
 mind to retrograde in its movements ; but every well 
 disposed person must be deeply solicitous that tbe 
 sedative and salutary coercion resulting from a 
 paramount conviction of religious responsibility may 
 regulate and restrain every its slightest tendency to 
 deviate from the right and smooth path. If the next 
 generation be not destined to act a fearful and mel- 
 ancholy, we may venture to anticipate that it will 
 perform a comparatively enviable, part. The seeds 
 of good and evil are abundantly sown, and accord- 
 ingly, as the genial glow of Christianity, or the chill 
 season of scepticism, shall prevail, the better or the 
 worse principle will spring up. 
 
 Meanwhile, the theological disputant should recol- 
 lect, that the prepossessed and carnal mind is little 
 disposed to be won over to belief by undue severity 
 of objurgation, or dogmatism in argument. The 
 Christian revelation, we believe, from the sincerest 
 conviction, to afford by far the most probable exposi- 
 tion of the modes of the divine government ever 
 offered to the apprehension of man. Believing this, 
 then, we ought to be both willing and able to meet 
 the adversary upon his own ground ; to show him 
 that, even upon his own principles, the very points 
 against which he contends supply the most rational 
 solution of his difficulties ; and that, turn where he 
 will, whether to unassisted reason or to revelation, 
 he must either be contented with a faith which, 
 accepting much upon external testimony, and arriving 
 at something more by legitimate research, is disposed 
 to repose its main confidence upon a well-founded 
 presumption of the Divine goodness, or that, abandon- 
 ing that ground, he must be prepared to descend, step 
 by step, into the most gloomy abyss of hopeless scep- 
 ticism. False positions in theological argument, 
 however conscientiously maintained, false excitement 
 and over-statements, unseemly and unhallowed in- 
 struments at all times, and even bad taste and want 
 ©f discrimination in the expression of our feelings, 
 
266 CONSISTENCY OF REVELATION 
 
 are not likely to escape without censure or ridicule in 
 an acute and critical age, such as our own. A Chris- 
 tian teacher, accordingly, who, as such, would be 
 effectively useful to the busy community around him, 
 must, so far as his avocations will permit, keep pace 
 with the times in all the accomplishments of rational 
 and ornamental knowledge. He must not allow to 
 his opponents the ready and plausible subterfuge, 
 that his belief is the result of his ignorance, or of the 
 narrowness of his conceptions. According to the 
 description given of him by his Divine Master, he 
 must consider himself as " a light set upon a hill," 
 towards which others are to look, and by which they 
 are to direct their steps. He must be ashamed neither 
 of his faith nor of his ignorance, where both one and 
 the other are in conformity with the Gospel standard. 
 He must not withhold, through an unworthy timidity, 
 the avowal of principles, of the solidity oi which he 
 is conscientiously convinced, nor, at the same time, 
 must he flinch from admitting that, with all his real 
 confidence and satisfaction in the correctness of his 
 own views, he is still, in many respects, walking 
 through life by faith only. Acting thus, he may be 
 assured, that from the moment that the world ceases 
 to treat him with scorn, as a visionary and an enthu- 
 siast, it will begin to turn towards him with feelings 
 of respect. And when this sentiment prevails, in its 
 turn, no small vantage ground is gained for the fur- 
 therance of his projects of usefulness. The first 
 object is to excite the sober attention of mankind ; 
 the second, to kindle a willingness and desire to be 
 better instructed. The point of repulsion once past, 
 the victory over, unbelief is half secured. The innate 
 principles of conscience and morality, and those 
 thrilling associations resulting from our connexion 
 with the things of the immaterial world, which exist 
 in every human breast, and require only to be roused 
 in order to make themselves perceived, will, with 
 God's blessing, do the rest. The evidences of our 
 
WITH HUMAN REASON. 267 
 
 faith are, by the wisdom of Providence, so nicely 
 balanced, that they are never gratuitously obtruded 
 upon the mind which turns away from them, nor 
 withheld from those who perseveringly seek after 
 them. If scepticism is a sin against religious mo- 
 rality, it is because it is most frequently a consequence 
 of coldness of heart, and of an indifference to the 
 purest and noblest aspirations of our nature. Belief, 
 accordingly, depends upon the will and upon a 
 proper discipline of the affections much more than 
 worldly men are willing to allow: so much so, that 
 we may safely challenge the whole annals of scepti- 
 cism to produce a single example of a person, who, 
 having carefully examined all the arguments for and 
 against the credibility of revelation, and with a sin- 
 cere anxiety to arrive at the truth, has concluded his 
 course by deliberately, and from conscientious con- 
 viction, taking his part with the unbeliever. 
 
 THE END. 
 
VALUABLE WORKS 
 
 PUBLISHED BT 
 
 J. & J. HARPER, 82 CLIFF-STREET, NEW-YORK, 
 
 THE TT'STORY OF MODERN 
 EUROPE, from the rise of tlie 
 Modem Kingdoms to the present 
 period. By William Russell, 
 LL D., and William Jones, Esq. 
 With Annotations by an Ameri- 
 can. In 3 vols. 8vo. 
 
 THE HISTORICAL WORKS of 
 the Rev. WILLIAM ROBERT- 
 SON, D.D. ; comprising liis HIS- 
 TORY of AMERICA; CHARLES 
 v.; SCOTLAND, and INDIA. 
 In S^vols.Svo. with Plates. 
 
 GIBBON'S HISTORY OF THE 
 DECLINE AND FALL OF THE 
 ROMAN EMPIRE. In 4 vols. 
 8vo. With Plates. 
 
 The above works (Russell's, RobertsonlSj and 
 Gibbon's) are stereotyped and printed 
 uniformly. Great pains have been taken 
 to render them perfect in everj: respect. 
 They are decidedly the best ediUona ever 
 liOblished iu this countrj'. 
 
 ENGLISH SYNONTMES, with 
 copious Illustrations and Explan- 
 ations, drawn from the best Wri- 
 ters. By Gkorgk Crabb, M.A. 
 A rnew Edition, enlarged. 8vo. 
 [Stereotyped.] 
 
 LIFE OF LORD BYRON. By 
 TuoMAs.'MooRE, Esq. In 2 vols. 
 8vo. With a Portrait. 
 
 HOOPER'S MEDICAL DICTION- 
 ARY. From the l»jt London 
 Editioi. With Additions, by Sa- 
 muel Akerly, M.D. 8vo. 
 
 COOPER'S SURGICAL DIC- 
 TIONARY. In 2 vcis. 8vo. 
 Greatly enlarged. [Stereo? yped.] 
 
 GOOD'S (Dr.JoHN Mason) STUDY 
 OF MEDICINE. In 5 vols. 8vo. 
 A new edition. With additions 
 by Samuel Cooper, M.D. 
 
 THE BOOK OF NATURE ; being 
 a popular Illustrtition oi the gene- 
 ral Laws and Phenomena of Crea- 
 tion, &c. By JuiiN Masiin Goon, 
 M.D. and F.R.S. 8vo With his 
 I.ifc. [Stejreolyped.] 
 
 DOMESTIC DUTIES ; or Instrtic- 
 tions to Married Ladies. J;y Wri. 
 William Parkes. i2mo. 
 
 ART OF INVIGORATING and 
 PROLONGING LIFE. ByWiL- 
 MAM Krr<;niNBR, M D. i8mo. 
 [Stereotyped.] 
 
 THE COOK'S ORACLE, AND 
 HOUSEKEEPER'S MANUAL. 
 By William KncniNER, M.D. 
 Adapted to the American Public 
 I2mo, [Stereotyped.] 
 
 GIBSON'S SURVEYING. Im- 
 proved and enlarged. By James 
 RVAN. 6vo. 
 
 DAVTES' SURVEYING. 8vo. 
 
 SURVEYORS' TABLES. 12mo. 
 
 BROWN'S DICTIONARY of the 
 HOLY BIBLE. From the last 
 genuine Edinburgh edition. 8vo. 
 
 BROWN'S (J.) CONCORDANCE. 
 Printed on Diamond type, in 
 the 32mo. form. [Stereotyped.] 
 
 SERIMONS ON IMPORTANT 
 SUBJECTS, by the Rev. Samuel 
 Davies, A.m., sometime Presi 
 dent of the College of New-Jer 
 sey. In 3 vols. 8vo. 
 
 THE WORKS OF THE REV 
 .TOHN WESLEY, A.M. With 
 his Life. Complete in 10 vols. 
 6vo. From the last London Edi- 
 tion. With a Portrait.' 
 
 LETTERS FROM THE iEGEAN. 
 By James Emerson, Esq. 8vo. 
 
 THE LITERARY REMAINS OF 
 THE LATE HENRY NEELE, 
 Author of.the " Romance of His- 
 tory," <kc.&c. 8vo. 
 
 RELIGIOUS DISCOURSES. By 
 
 Sir Walter Scott, Bart ISiuo. 
 
 LIVES OF THE SIGNERS OP 
 THE DECLARATION OF IN- 
 DEPENDENCE. ]2mo. 
 
 SKETCHES FROM VENETIAN 
 IlliTaRY. 2 vols. l8mo 
 
Works Published hy J. djf J. Harper, 
 
 THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS, 
 From the earliest period to the pro- 
 sent time. By the Rev. H. H. Mil- 
 man. In 3 vols. 18mo. illustrated 
 with original maps, &c. 
 
 THE LIFE OF NAPOLEON BO- 
 NAPARTE. ByJ.G.LoCKHART, 
 
 Esq. With copperplate engravings. 
 
 2 Tols. 18mo. 
 LIFE OF NELSON. By Robert 
 
 SouTHKY, Esq. With a portrait. 
 THE LIFE OF ALEXANDER 
 
 THE GREAT. By the Rev. J. 
 
 Williams. With a map. I8mo. 
 NATURAL HISTORY OF IN- 
 SECTS. Illustrated by numerous 
 
 engravings. 18mo. 
 THE LIFE OF LORD BYRON 
 
 By John Galt, Esq. 18mo. 
 THE LIFE OF MOHAMMED, 
 
 Founder of the Religion of Islam, 
 
 and of the Empire of the Saracens. 
 
 By the Rev. Gkorge Bush, A.M. 
 
 With a plate. 18mo. 
 LETTERS ON DEMONOLOGY 
 
 AND WITCHCRAFT. By Sir 
 
 Walter Scott, Bart. 18mo. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. By 
 the Rev. G. R. Gleiu, In 2 vols. 
 ISmo.with maps of Palestine, «fcc. 
 
 NARRATIVE OF DISCOVERY 
 AND ADVENTURE IN THE 
 POLAR SEAS AND REGIONS. 
 By Professor Leslie, Professor 
 Jameson, and Hugh Murray, 
 Esq. With maps, &c. ISmo. 
 
 LIFE AND TIMES OF GEORGE 
 IV., with Anecdotes of Distin- 
 guished Persons of the last Fifty 
 Years. By the Rev. George Cko- 
 LY. With a portrait. 18mo. 
 
 NARRATIVE OF DISCOVERY 
 AND ADVENTURE IN AFRI- 
 CA, from the earliest ages to the 
 present time. With Illustrations 
 of the Geology, Mineralogy, and 
 Zoology. By Professor Jameson, 
 James Wilson, Esq., and Hogh 
 MrRRAY, Esq. With a map and 
 wood engravings. ISino. 
 
 inSTORY OF CHIVALRY AND 
 THE CRUSADES. By G. P. R. 
 James, Esq. 18mo., with a plate 
 
 LiVeS OF EMINENT PAINTERS 
 AND SCULPTORS. By Allan 
 Cunningham, Esq. In 3 vols. 
 ISmo. with portraits. 
 
 LIFE OF MARY QUEEN OF 
 
 SCOTS. By Henry Glassforb 
 Bell. In 2 vols. ISmo. Portrait. 
 
 HISTORY OF POLAND. By .1. 
 Fletcher, Esq. With a portrait 
 of Kosciusko. 18mo. 
 
 FESTIVALS, GAMES, AND A- 
 MUSEMENTS, Ancient and Mod- 
 ern. By Horatio Smith. 18mo. 
 
 HISTORY OF EGYPT. By Rev 
 M. Russell, LL.D. ISmo. With 
 Engravings. 
 
 LIFE OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON- 
 By David Brewster, LL.D 
 With a Portrait. 
 
 PALESTINE ; or the HOLY LAND. 
 By M. Russell, LL.D. 18mo. 
 
 MEMOIRS OF THE EMPRESS 
 JOSEPHINE. By Dr. Memes 
 ISmo. Portrait. 
 
 COURT AND CAMP OF BONA- 
 PARTE. 18mo. Portrait. 
 
 THE LIVES OF CELEBRATED 
 TRAVELLERS. By J. A. St. 
 John. 2vo1s. 18mo. 
 
 XENOPHON. Translated by Ep 
 ward Spelman, Esq. and Sir M 
 A. Cooper. 2 vols. ISmo. 
 
 DEMOSTHENES. By Leland 
 In 2 vols. ISmo. 
 
 SALLUST. By Rose. ISmo. 
 
 MASSINGER'S PLAYS. Designed 
 for family use. In 3 vols. ISmo. 
 With a Portrait. 
 
 FORD'S PLAYS. 2 vols. ISmo. 
 
 LIFE of DR. E. D. CLARKE. 8vo. 
 
 FRENCH REVOLKTIdN of 1830. 
 
 LIFE OF VAN HALEN, &c. 8vo, 
 
 MILLER'S GREECE, 12mo. 
 
 SMART'S HORACE. 2 vols. I8ma 
 
 RELIGIOUS DISCOURSES. By 
 Sir Walter Scott, Bart. ISmo. 
 
 PELHAM; OR, THE ADVEN- 
 TURES OF A GENTLEMAN. A 
 Novel. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 THE DISOWNED. A Novel. In 
 2 vols. 12mo. By the Author of 
 "Pelham,"&c. [Stereotyped.] 
 
 DEVEREUX. A Novel. In 2 vols. 
 12mo. By the Author of " Pel- 
 ham," &c. [Stereotyped.] 
 
 PAUL CLIFFORD. A Novel. Ih 
 2 vols. 12mo. By the Author of 
 " Pelham," &c. [Stereotyped.] 
 
 FALKLAND. A Novel. By th« 
 Author of *' Pelham," &c. 12ma 
 
Works Published by J, 6f J, Harper* 
 
 AFFECTING SCENES ; being Pas- 
 
 sages ftom the Uiary of a Physi- 
 cian. 2vols. lyrno. [Stereotyped.] 
 ANASTASIUS. A Novel. In 2 vols. 
 
 12mo. 
 YOliril AND MANHOOD OF 
 
 CYRir. THORNTON. A Novel. 
 
 2 vols. 12mo. [Stereotyped.] 
 THE DUTCHMAN'S FIRESIDE. 
 
 A Talc. By J. K. Paulding, 
 
 Esq. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 THE YOUNG DUKE. A Novel. 
 
 By the Author of " Vivian Grey." 
 
 2 vols. 12mo. 
 CALEB WH.LIAMS. In 2 vols. 
 
 121110. By the Author of " Cloud- 
 
 eslcy," &c. 
 PHILIP AUGUSTUS. A Novel. 
 
 £y the Author cf ♦' Darriley," &c. 
 
 2 vols. 12ino. 
 THE CLUB-BOOK. By various 
 
 Authors. la 2 vcls. 12nio. 
 DE VERE. A Novel. By the 
 
 A uthor of " Tremaine." In 2 
 
 vols. 12tno. 
 
 THE SMUGGLER. ANoveL By 
 the Author oi' "The O'Hara 
 Tales," &c. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 EVELINA. A Novel. By Miss 
 BuiiNKY. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 BULWER'S NOVELS. Printed and 
 bound uniformly in sets of 8 vol- 
 umes — embracing "Pelham," "the 
 Disowned," " Devereux," and 
 "Paul Clifford." 
 
 DARNLEY. A Novel. ByG.P. R. 
 Jamks, Author of "Richelieu." In 
 2 vols, i2mo. 
 
 DE L'ORxME. A Novel. By the 
 Author of " Richelieu" and " Darn- 
 ley.'-' 2 vols. i2mo. 
 
 HAVERHILL. ANoveL By J. A. 
 Junks, Esq. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 TRAITS OF TRAVEL. A Novel. 
 In 2 vols. 12mo. By T. C. G rat- 
 tan, Author of "Highways and 
 Byways." 
 
 THE HEIRESS OF BRUGES. A 
 Tale. By the Author of " High- 
 ways and Byways," "Traits of 
 Travel," &,c. 2 vols. 12mu. 
 
 WALTER COLYTON. A Tale, 
 In 2 vols. 12rn«. By Hoiiack 
 S.VI1TII, Author of " Brambletye- 
 house," "Zillah," &c, «fec. 
 
 THE SIAMESE TWINS. By the 
 Author of " Pelham," &c. >2nio. 
 
 MAXWELL. A Novel. By tho 
 Author of " Sayings and Doingu." 
 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 LAWRIE TODD ; OR, THE SET- 
 TLERS IN THE WOODS. By 
 John Gai/i, Esq. In 2 vols. 12.710. 
 
 SOUTHENNAN. A Novel. In 2 
 vols. 12ino. By the Author of 
 " Lawrie Todd," «fcc. &c. 
 
 THE NEW FOREST. A Novel. 
 In 2 vols. 12nio. By the Author 
 of " Brambletye-House," " Zil- 
 lah," &c. &c. 
 
 ROXOBEL. By Mrs. Sherwood. 
 In 3 vols. 18mo. 
 
 THE RIVAI.S. A Novel. By tho 
 Author of "llie Collegians," &6, 
 In 2 VvjIs. 12mo. 
 
 HUNGARIAN TALES. In 2 vols. 
 12mo. By Mrs. Gork, Author oi 
 " tht Lettre de Cachet" and " Ro- 
 mances of Real Life." 
 
 ROMANCES OF REAL LIFE. Ifl 
 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 FRANCE, IN 1829-,30. By Lad^ 
 MoRGAxN. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 COMING OUT; and THE FIELD 
 OF THE FORTY FOOTSTEPS 
 Novels. By Misses Jank and An- 
 na Maria Portkr. In 3 vols. 
 
 THE BARONY. A Novel. In 2 
 vols. 12mo. By Miss Anna Ma- 
 ria PoRTKR. 
 
 CLOUDESLEY. A Novel. In Sf 
 vols. 12mo. By the Author of" Ca- 
 leb Williams," &c. 
 
 SKETCHES OF IRISH CHARAC- 
 TER. By Mrs. Sarah C. Hall. 
 
 THE RIVALS OF ESTE ; and 
 
 other Poems. By James G. and' 
 
 Mary E. Brooks. 12mo. 
 BEATRICE. A Tale, founded on 
 
 Facts. By Mrs. Hofland. In 2 
 
 vols. 12mo. 
 CONTRAST. ANoveL ByRKGiNA 
 
 Maria Ro( hk, Author of "the 
 
 Children of the Abbey," &c. Jcc. 
 
 la 2 vols. 12mo. 
 THE DENOUNCED. ANoveL In 
 
 2 vols. 12mo. By the Author oi 
 
 " The Smuggler.'' 
 THE OXONLA^S. A Novel. In 
 
 2 vols. 12mo. By the Author ot 
 
 " The Rou6." 
 THE COITNTRY CITRATE. By 
 
 tiie Author of "Til* Suballcra.* 
 
 In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 O 
 
Works Pubtisnea by J. 4" ^^ Harper* 
 
 ROMANCE of HISTORY. France. 
 In 2 vols. 12mo. By Leitcu 
 RiTciHK, Esq. 
 
 ROMANCE of HISTORY. Spain. 
 In 2 vols. 12mo. By Dan T. Dk 
 Trukba. 
 
 ROMANCE OF HISTORY. Italy. 
 Jn 2 vols. 12mo. By Charles 
 Macfarlank, 
 
 THE INCOGNITO ; or, SINS AND 
 PECCADILLOES. A Novel. By 
 the Author of " Romance of His- 
 tory — Spain," "The Castilian,"«fec. 
 
 THE TALBA. A Novel. By Mrs. 
 Bray, Author of " The White 
 Hoods," " The Protestant," &c. 
 
 WAVERLEY; OR, 'TIS SIXTY 
 YExVRS SINCE. A Novel. In 2 
 vols. 12mo. Revised, corrected, 
 and enlarged by the Author. 
 
 DE LISLE. A Novel. 2vols. 12mo. 
 
 ST. VALENTINE'S DAY; or, THE 
 FAIR MAID OF PERTH. By 
 the Author of " Waverley." In 2 
 vols. 12mo. 
 
 THE DOOM OF DEVORGOIL ; 
 and AUCHINDRANE. By the 
 Author of " Waverley." 12mo. 
 
 ALMACK'S REVISITED ; or, HER- 
 BERT MILTON. A Novel. In 
 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 YESTERDAY IN IRELAND. A 
 Novel. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 •WALDEGRAVE. A Novel. In 2 
 vols. 12mo. 
 
 THE ADVENTURES of a KING'S 
 PAGE. A Novel. 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 TALES AND SKETCHES. By a 
 Country Schoolmaster. 12mo. 
 
 SEPARATION. A Novel. By La- 
 dy Charlotte Biry, Author of 
 " Flirtation." In 2 vol's. 12 mo. 
 
 THE EXCLUSIVES. A Novel. In 
 2 vols. 12rno. 
 
 LIFE OF MANSIE WAUCII, TAI- 
 LOR IN DALKEITH. 12mo. 
 
 THE LOST HEIR; and THE PRE- 
 DICTION. A Novel. In 2 vols. 
 
 THE SUBALTERN'S I OG-BOOK. 
 A Novel. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 FOSCARINT. A Novel. In 2 vols. 
 
 HAJJI BABA. A Novel. In 2 vols. 
 
 POSTHUMOUS PAPERS, FACE- 
 TIOUS AND FANCIFUL, l2mo. 
 
 APICIAN MOPxSELS. A Comical 
 WoT-k. "With Cuts. 12ino. 
 D 
 
 STORIES OF A BRIDE. In 2 
 
 vols. 12mo. 
 
 THE SCHOOL OF FASHION. A 
 Novel. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 RYBRENT DE CRUCE. A Novel, 
 In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 THE ENGLISH AT HOME. 
 Novel. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 THE LAST OF THE PLANTA 
 GENETS. An Historical Ro 
 mance. In 2 vols. I2mo. 
 
 TALES OF MILITARY LIFE. Ii 
 2 vols. 12mo. By the Author oi 
 " The Military Sketch-Book." 
 
 STRATTON HILL. A Tale of the 
 Civil Wars. In 2 vols. 12ir»o. 
 
 PEACE CAMPAIGNS OF A COR- 
 NET. A Novel. In 2 vols. 12mo. 
 
 PRIVATE LIFE. A Novel. In 2 
 vols. 12mo. 
 
 TALES OF THE WEST. 2 vols. 
 12mo. 
 
 JACQUELINE OF HOLLAND. By 
 T. C. Grattan, Esq. 2vols.l2mo. 
 
 SIR EDWARD SEAWARD'S 
 NARRATIVE OF HIS SHIP- 
 WRECK, &c. Edited by Miss 
 Jane Porter. In 3 vols. 12mo. 
 In Press, 
 
 HARPER'S FAMILY LIBRARY^ 
 Of this work, which is intended to 
 combine the two objects of instruc- 
 tion and amusement, comprising 
 as much entenaining matter as 
 can be given along with useful 
 knowledge, several volumes are 
 already published. 
 
 THE LIBRARY OF SELECT 
 NOVELS — which will embrace no 
 works but such as have received 
 the impress of general appro- 
 bation, or have been written by 
 authors of established character 
 Several volumes are now pub- 
 lished. See Catalogue. 
 
 DRAMATIC LIBRARY— Being se- 
 lections from popular standard 
 Dramatic writers ; illustrated with 
 Explanatory Notes, and adapted 
 to Family reading, by the omia 
 sion of all exceptionable passages. 
 Several volumes are already pubr 
 lished. See Catalogue. 
 
 ^i'AMILY CIASSICAL LIBRARY; 
 or English translations of the 
 most valuable Greek and Latin 
 Classics. Soveral voInmcH nn 
 now published. See CjUmIju^jiv-. 
 
HARPER'S FAMILY LIBRARY. 
 
 V0L0MK8 ALREADY PUBLISHED. 
 
 I. n. IIL MIIJVIAN'S HISTORY OP THE JEWS S rol» 
 
 IV. V. LOCKHARTS UFB OP NAPOLEON BONAPARTE 2 to1» 
 
 VI. SOUTHErS LIFE OF LORD NELSON 1 toL 
 
 VIL WILLIAMS'S LIFE OP ALEXAjNDER THE GREAT 1 toU 
 
 VIIL NATURAL HISTORY OF INSECTS 1 roL 
 
 IX. GALrS LIFE OF LORD BYRON 1 toL 
 
 X. BUSH'S LIFE OP MOHAMMED 1 toL 
 
 XL SCOTT ON DEMONOLOGY AND WITCHCRAFT 1 toL 
 
 XILXIIL GLEIG'S HISTORY OP THE BIBLE 2 toIs. 
 
 XIV. DISCOVERY, Sco. IN THE POLAR SEAS AND REGIONS 1 roL 
 
 XV. CROLY^ LIFE OF GEORGE IV 1 toL 
 
 XVL DISCOVERY AND ADVENTURE IN AFRICA 1 toL 
 
 XVIL XVIIL XIX. CUNNINGHAMS LIVES OP PaLNTERS, dto. 3 toIs. 
 XX. JAMES'S HISTORY OF CHIVALRY AND THE CRUSADES 1 yoL 
 
 XXL XXIL BELL'S LIFE OF MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS 2 rols. 
 
 XXIIL RUSSELL'S ANCIENT AND MODERN EGYPT 1 vol^ 
 
 XXIV. FLETCHER'S HISTORY OF POLAND 1 toL 
 
 XXV. SMITirs FESTIVALS, GAMES, AND AMUSEMENTS... 1 ToL 
 
 XXVI. BREWSTER'S LIFE OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON 1 toL 
 
 XX VH. RUSSELL'S PALESTINE, OR THE HOLY LAND 1 vrU 
 
 XXVIIL MEME'S MEMOIRS OP THE EMPRESS JOSEPHINE I voL 
 
 XXIX. THE COURT AND CAMP OP BONAPARTE 1 toL 
 
 XXX. LIVES OP EARLY NAVIGATORS, dtc 1 troL 
 
 XXXI. D ESCRirnoN OF ITrCAlRN'S ISLAN D, «Stc 1 ToL 
 
 Classical SorloH* 
 
 L H. XENOPIION. (Anabasis and Cyropwdw.) 2 rols. 
 
 m. IV. LELAND'S DEMOSTHENES 2 vols. 
 
 V. ROSE'S BALLUST 1 toL 
 
 Drainallo Series* 
 
 I n ni. MASSINOER'S PLAYS S vola. 
 
 IV V. FORD'S PI.AVS 2vol«. 
 
 LIBRARY OF SELECT NOVELS. 
 
 Ln. CYRIL THORNTON By Hamilton 2 vols. 
 
 IIL IV. THE DUTCHMAN'S FIRESIDE Paulding 2 vols. 
 
 V. VI. THE YOUNG DUKE D'lsroeli 2 rols. 
 
 VIL VUL ANASTASIUS Hope 2 toIs 
 
 IX. X. PHILIP AUGUSTUS James 2 rols. 
 
 XI. XIL CALEB WILLIAMS Godwin 2 toIs. 
 
 XUL XIV. THE CLUB-BOOK Plckln, Ac 2toI* 
 
 XV. XVL DE VERB Ward 2toIs. 
 
 XVaXVllL THE SMUGGLER.... Banlin 2toIs. 
 
 XIX. XX. EUGENE ARAM Balwer 2 vols. 
 
 XXLXXn. EVELINA Burnsy 2 vols. 
 
 XXIU. XXIV. THE SPY Cuoper 2 volt. 
 
POPULAR WORKS, 
 
 Recemly published by J. & J. Harper, New- York* 
 
 Gibbon's Koine (fine) 4 v. 8vo 
 
 Robertsorr)? Works • 3 t. 8vo. 
 
 History of Mtnlem Europe, 3 v. 8vo. 
 Life of CyroTi, by Moore. .2 v. 8vo. 
 Cooper's Stir*. Oirtionarj', 2 v, 8vo. 
 Hoo}^)cr's Med. Dinionnry, 2 v. 8vo. 
 Wesley's Works and SermunaSvo. 
 
 I)avi»is's Sermons 3 v. 8vo. 
 
 Rev. Robt. Hail's Works, 3 v. 8vo. 
 Good'a Study of Medicine, 5 v. 8vo. 
 
 G<iod'8 Book of Nniiiro 8vo. 
 
 Keith on Prophecy 12mo. 
 
 Cnihb'8 English Synonyme«..8vo. 
 Bro^VT^n Bible Dictionary — 8vo. 
 
 Brown's Concordance 32aio. 
 
 l>avii«s' Surveying 8vo. 
 
 Davies' Oeotnetry 8vo 
 
 D.^vies' ?4ha<lt»a and l?ha<!ows, 8vc». 
 
 Briiish Spy. by Wirt \'2mo. 
 
 Co^*» (X)lumbia River 8vo. 
 
 WIIUh's I'oerns 8to. 
 
 Anntiis Tryon County. .. . — 8va. 
 
 Gibs4iij'a Surveying 8vo 
 
 Lciiers Ironri iho A^ean Svo. 
 
 Dibdin's Reniiniscencea Sra, 
 
 Life of Dr. Clarke Sti*. 
 
 Neele's Life and Remains ....Sro. 
 Moore'sLife of Fitzgerald 2 r. 12ino. 
 FYench Revolution, 1830. ..12ino. 
 France, by Lady Morgan, 2 v. 12mo 
 Modern American Cookery, 16mo. 
 
 Housekef per's Manual 12ino. 
 
 Domestic Duties 12mo. 
 
 Mathematical Tables 12mo. 
 
 Lives of Signers of Deo. Ind. 12ino. 
 
 Brooks's Poems 12ma 
 
 Miller's Greece 12mo, 
 
 Schoherl's Christianity 12ina 
 
 Art of Invigorating Life ....18mo. 
 
 Smart's Horace 2 vols. 18mo. 
 
 The Northern Traveller .... 18mo. 
 
 Xenophon 2 v. ISmou 
 
 Demosthenes 2 v. ISrnot. 
 
 Sallust 18ma. 
 
 Massinger's Plays 3 ▼. 18mo. 
 
 Ford's Plays 2 r. l8mo. 
 
 For FAMILY" LIBRARY, seo Cat- 
 alogue of " Valuable Works." 
 
 Fclbnm .2v. 12mo. 
 
 The Di.««wnc<! 8v. 12ino. 
 
 Dwtrfcnx 2v. 12lTK) 
 
 Paul Clifford if. l2mo. 
 
 FiUjiene A ram 2 r. J2mo. 
 
 Falkland 12mo. 
 
 Sianiese Twins 12rno. 
 
 Dutchman's Fireside... 2 T. l2mo. 
 
 Cyrd TliorMfon 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 The Youiij; Dnko 8 v \'2tno. 
 
 Anatjiawiu!* 2 v. P2mo. 
 
 Caleb Williamfi 2 v. l*2mo. 
 
 Philip Augusuis 2 v, i2mo. 
 
 The f 'III t>- ilook 2 V. 12mo. 
 
 be Venj 2 v. l2mo. 
 
 The Smu;{glcr .2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Eveluia 2 V. 12mo. 
 
 Si.'awarJ't» Narritive — 3 v, t2mo. 
 Jar.jueline of Uoliaiid • -2 v. l2ino. 
 
 Roxobel 8 V. 18mo. 
 
 jiaverhill. 2 r. 12mo. 
 
 fncogiiifo .2 v. 12niO. 
 
 The Talba 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 l)e L'Orme 2 v. I2mo. 
 
 Waverley 2 v, 12mo. 
 
 Walter Col y ton 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 C'loudesley 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 the Lost Heir 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Stones of a Bride 2 t. 12irio. 
 
 The English at Home . .2 v. J2mo. 
 
 Coming Out, &c 2 ▼. 12ino. 
 
 Southennan , . . » .2 v. P2mo. 
 
 Hajji Baba 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 •JT^Mts of Traral ....... .2 r. 12mo 
 
 The Younger Son 2 v. 12mo 
 
 The New Forest 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Heiress of Bruges 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 The Rivals 2 ▼. 12mo. 
 
 Rom. of Hiiatory, Spain. 2y. 12mo. 
 Rxmi. of History, Prance 2^. l2mo. 
 Rom. of Hist. Italy, ... .2 v. P2mo. 
 
 Hungarian Tales 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Romance and Reality. ..2 v. 12nio. 
 The False Step, &c. .. .2 r. 12mo. 
 
 Reparation 2 v. l2mo. 
 
 Private Life 2r. 12mo. 
 
 Damley 2r. 12mo. 
 
 LawrieTodd 2t. 12mo. 
 
 Beatrice 2r. 12mo. 
 
 Yesterday In Ireland . . .2 v. 12mo. 
 St. Valentine's Day,«fcc. 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 VValdegrave 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Adventures of a Page . 2 v. 12mo. 
 Rybrent De Cruce ... .2 v. 12mo 
 The School of Fashion, 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Siratton Hill 2 v. 12mo 
 
 Almack's Revisited 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Campaigns of a Cornet, 2 v. 12mo. 
 Tales of Military Life . .2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Foscarinl 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 The Country Curate.. ..2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Maxwell 2 v. 12rno. 
 
 The Oxonians 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 The Denounced 2 v. 12mo. 
 
 Sketches of Irish Character. .12mo, 
 
 Leggett's Tales, &c 12mo. 
 
 Posthuiuous Papers 12mo. 
 
 Diary of a Physician. . .!J t. I8n|0. 
 
FAMILY LIBRARY. 
 
 The publishers of the Family Libraty, anxious to obtain 
 and to deserve the favourable opinion of the public, with 
 pleasure embrace the present opportunity to express their 
 warm and sincere thanks for the liberal patronage which hag 
 been bestowed upon their undertaking, and their determina- 
 tion to dT5 all that lies in their power to merit its continu- 
 ance. For some time previous to the commencement of the 
 Family Library, they had entertained thoughts and wishes 
 of reducing the quantity of merely fictitious writings, which 
 the reading public had made it their interest to issue from 
 their press ; and they were conscious that this could only 
 be done by substituting for them works that should be equally 
 entertaining and more instructive. The difficulty was to 
 find an adequate supply of books possessing these requisites. 
 At this time the attention of English philanthropists and 
 authors was strongly turned to the general dissemination of 
 useful knowledge by means of popular abridgments, conve- 
 nient in form, afforded at low prices, and as much as possi- 
 ble simplified in style, so as to be accessible as well to the 
 rrjcans as to the comprehension of " the people," in contra- 
 distinction to the educated and the wealthy. The result has 
 been the production of numerous collections, embracing well 
 written works treating of almost every department of art and 
 science, and, by their simplicity, clearness, and entire freedom 
 from technicality, exactly calculated to attract and compen- 
 sate the attention of the general reader. From these collec- 
 tions, with additions and improvements, and such alterations 
 as were necessary to adapt the work to the taste and wants 
 of the American public. Harper's Family Library has 
 been composed ; and it is with pride and pleasure that the 
 publishers acknowledge the distinguished favour with which 
 it has been received. The approbation and support that 
 have already been bestowed upon it are greater than have 
 ever been conferred upon any work of a similar character 
 published in the United States ; and the sale of every suc- 
 ceeding volume still demonstrates its continually increasing 
 popularity. In several instances gentlemen of wealth and 
 of excellent judgment have been so much pleased with the 
 character of the Librar}% that they have purchased numbers 
 of complete sets as appropriate and valuable gifts to the 
 families of their less opulent relatives ; and others have 
 
FAMILY LIBRARY. 
 
 unsolicited, been active in their endeavours to extend its 
 circulation among their friends and acquaintances. With 
 these strong inducements to persevere, the publishers are 
 resolved to prosecute their undertaking with additional zeal, 
 energy, and circumspection. What has been done they 
 desire their patrons to consider rather in the light of an ex- 
 periment, than a specimen of what they hope and intend to 
 accomplish : they freely and gratefully acknowledge that 
 the circulation and popularity of the Family Library are now 
 such as to justify them in disregarding expense, and to 
 demand from them every care and every exertion. It shall 
 De their study to make such arrangements as shall warrant 
 them in assuring the friends and patrons of the Library that 
 the forthcoming volumes, instead of decreasing in interest 
 and value, will be found still more deserving of the support 
 and approbation of the public than those which have pre 
 ceded them. 
 
 In order to render it thus meritorious, the proprietors 
 intend incorporating in it nereafter, selections of the best 
 productions from the various other Libraries and Miscella- 
 nies now publishing in Europe. Several well-known au- 
 thors have been engaged to prepare for it also works of an 
 American character; and the Family Library^ when com- 
 pleted, will include a volume on every useful and interesting 
 subject not embraced in the other " Libraries" now prepar- 
 ing by the same publishers. The entire series will be the 
 production of authors of eminence, who have acquired ce- 
 lebrity by their literary labours, and whose names, as they 
 appear in succession, will afford the surest guarantee for the 
 satisfactory manner in which the subjects will be treated. 
 
 With these arrangements, the publishers flatter themselves 
 that they will be able to ofier to the American public a work 
 oi unparalleled merit and cheapness, forming a body of litera- 
 ture which will obtain the praise of having instructed many, 
 and amused all ; and, above every other species of eulogy, 
 of being fit to be introduced to the domestic circle without 
 reserve or exception. 
 
 The Dramatic Series of the Family Library will consist 
 pnncipally of the works of those Dramatists who flourished 
 contemporaneously with Shakspeare, in which all such 
 passages as are inconsistent with modem delicacy will be 
 omitted. The number of volumes will be limited, and they 
 will be bound and numbered in such a manner as to render it 
 not essentially necessary to obtain them to complete a set of 
 the Family Labraij. 
 
Recommendations of the Family Library, 
 
 Tub following opinions, selected nrom highly respectable Journala, will 
 *nablo those who are unacquainted with tho Family Library to form an 
 estinialo of its merits. Numerous other noiiceH, equally favourable, and 
 from sources equally respectable, might be presented if deemed neceHsary. 
 "The Family Library.— Avery excellent, and always entertaining ^Wii- 
 eeUany.^—Edi7iburgh Review, No. 103. 
 
 " The Family Library.— We think this series of books entitled to the 
 extensive patronage they have received from the public. The subjects 
 selected are, generally, both useful and interesting in themselves, and are 
 treated in a popular and agreeable manner : the style is clear, easy, and 
 flowing, adapted to the taste of general readers, for whom the books are 
 designed. The writers are mostly men of high rank in the literary world, 
 and appear to possess the happy talent of blending instruction with 
 
 amusement We hesitate not to commend it to the public as a valuable 
 
 series of works, and worthy a place in every gentleman's library."— 3/a^a- 
 zine of Useful and Entertaining Knowledge. 
 
 " We take the opportunity again to recommend this valuable series of 
 volumes to the public patronage. We know of no mode in which so mucU 
 entertaining matter may be procured, at so cheap a rate, as in the Faffiily 
 Library."— iV. Y. Daily Advertiser. 
 
 "The Family Library should be in the hands of every person. Thus 
 far it has treated of subjects interesting to all, condensed in a persprcuous 
 
 and agreeable style We have so repeatedly spoken of the merits of the 
 
 design of this work, and of the able manner in which it is edited, that on 
 this occasion we will only repeat our conviction, that it is worthy a place 
 in every library in the country, and will prove one of the most use(\il as 
 it is one of the most interesting publications which has ever issued fronj 
 the American press." — N. Y. Courier ^ Enquirer. 
 
 "It is needless at this late period to commend to public attention and 
 encouragement the collection of delightftil works now in a course of pub- 
 lication under the appropriate title of the Family Library."— JV. Y. Eve 
 ning Journal. 
 
 " We have repeatedly expressed our unwavering confidence in the 
 merits of this valuable series of popular and instructive books. The 
 Family Library has now reached its sixteenth number, with the increasing 
 favour of the enlightened American public ; and we have heard of but 
 one dissenting voice among the periodical and newspaper publishers who 
 have frequeniiy noticed and applauded the plan and the execution of the 
 Family Library. A censure so entirely destitute of reason cannot rnjure 
 a class of publications pure in sentiment and judicious and tasteful in 
 composition." — The Cabinet of Religion, iVc. 
 
 " The names of the writers employed are a sufficieiit surety that the 
 Wieritof the Family Library will suffer no decline."— iV. Y. Evening Post, 
 
 " The Family Library is a collection which should be sought after by 
 every one desirous of procuring the most valuable new works in the 
 chea{>est and most convenient form."— iV. Y. Daily Seritinel. 
 
 "Those who condense and arrange such works for publication, and 
 they also who promulgate them, richly deserve the thanks and patronage 
 of all enlightened communities in the country. The Family Library 
 promises to be a mast useful and cheap repository of the most important 
 events of profane, ancient, and modern history. — A .series of volumes, 
 well conducted, and published with such stirring contents, cannot fail to 
 surpass all dry encyclopedias, or diffuse and elaborate histories or biogra- 
 phies, miserably translated, and extejnd,ed to the very stretch of ver- 
 bosity ''—PbHaddphia Gazette 
 
FAMILY CLASSICAL LIBRARY. 
 
 "A greater desideratum to the English reader cannot well be brought 
 to public notice."— BeZZ's Weekly Messenger. 
 
 " The Family Classical Library may be reckoned as one of the most 
 Instructive series of works now in the course of publication."— Cawfirirfg-e 
 Chronicle. 
 
 " A series of works under the title of the Family Classical Library 
 is now in the course of publication, which will, no doubt, arrest the atten- 
 tion of all the admirers of elegant and polite literature— of that literature 
 which forms the solid and indispensable basis of a sound and gentlemanly 
 education." — Bath Herald. 
 
 " We are inclined to augur the most beneficial results to the rising 
 generation from the plan and nature of this puolication ; and we doubt not 
 that under the able superintendence of Mr. Valpy, the value of the present 
 work will not exceed its success as a mere literary speculation. It ought 
 to find a place in every school and private family in the kingdom." — BriS' 
 tol Journal. 
 
 " The design of this publication is highly laudable : if it be patronised 
 according to its deserts, we have no hesitation in saying that its success 
 will be very considerable." — Edinburgh Advertiser. 
 
 *' If we had been called on to state what in our opinion was wanted to 
 complete the several periodicals now in course of publication, we should 
 have recommended a translation of the most approved ancient writers, in 
 a corresponding style. This undertaking, therefore, of Mr. Valpy's, most 
 completely meets the view we had entertained on the subject. We 
 strongly recommend the production to the notice of schools, as its perusal 
 must tend to implant on the minds of the pupils a love for ancient lore. 
 In Ladies' Seminaries the series will, indeed, be invaluable — the stores of 
 antiquity being thus thrown open to them." — Plymouth and Devonport 
 Herald. 
 
 " Economy is the order of the day in books. The Family Classical Li' 
 brary will greatly assist the classical labours of tutors as well as pupils. 
 We suspect that a period is arriving when the Greek and Latin authors 
 will be more generally read through the medium of translations." — Chel' 
 tenham Journal. 
 
 " We avail ourselves of the earliest opportunity of introducing to the 
 notice of our readers a work which appears to promise the utmost advan- 
 tage to the rising generation in particular. There is no class of people to 
 whom it is not calculated to be useful— to the scholar, it will be an agree- 
 able guide and companion ; while those to whom a classical education 
 has been denied will find in it a pleasant and a valuable avenue towards 
 those ancient models of literary greatness, which, even in this age of 
 boasted refinement, we are proud to imiiate.'^— Aberdeen Chronicle. 
 
 "The Family Classical Library will contain the most correct and ele- 
 gant translations of the immortal works of all the great authors of Greece 
 and Rome ; an acquaintance with whose writings is indispensable to every 
 man who is desirous of acquiring even modern classical attainments."— 
 Liverpool Albion. 
 
 " This volume promises to be an invaluable acquisition to those but 
 partially acquainted with the Greek and Latin languages : such of the 
 fair sex more especially as direct their laudable curiosity in the channel 
 of classic literature must find in translation the very key to the knowledge 
 they seek. The mere trifle for which the lover of literature may now 
 furnish his library with an elegant and uniform edition of the best trans 
 lations from the classics, will, it cannot be doubted, ensure the Family 
 Classical Library a welcome reception."— VVboZ/Tier's Exeter Gazette. 
 
 " This work will supply a desideratum in literature ; and we hope it 
 will meet with encouragement. The translations of many of the ancient 
 authors, who may be looked on as the great storehouse of modern litera- 
 ture, are out of the reach of the English reader ; and this publication will 
 render them accessible to dW'— Yorkshire Gazette 
 
NEW RELIGIOUS BOOKS, FOR GENERAL READING. 
 
 J. & J. HARPER NEW-YORK, 
 
 HAVE NOW IN THE COCRSE OF REPURLICATION, 
 THE 
 
 THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY. 
 
 THIS PUBLICATION WILL BK COMPRISKD IN A LIMITED NTTMBER Or 
 
 VOLUMES, AND IS INTENDED TO FORM, WHEN COMfLETKD, 
 
 A DIGESTED SYSTEM OF RELIGIOUS AND 
 
 KCCLESIASTICAL KNOWLEDGE. 
 
 THE FIRST NUMBER (nOW PUBLISHED) CONTAINS 
 
 THE LIFE OF WICLIF. 
 
 BY CHARLES WEBB LE BAS, M.A. 
 
 Profesflor in the East India College, Herts ; and late Fellow of Trinity 
 
 College, Cambridge. 
 
 ■tl ONE VOLUME. EMBELLISHED WITH A PORTRAIT Of WICLIF. 
 
 VOLUMES IN PREPARATION. 
 
 THE CONSISTENCY OF THE WHOLE SCHEME OF REVELA. 
 
 TION WITH ITSELF, AND WITH HUMAN REASON. 
 
 By p. N. Shuttlkworth, D.D. 
 
 Warden of New College, Oxford. (In Press.) 
 
 HISTORY OF THE INQUISITION. 
 
 By Joseph Blanco White, M.A. 
 
 Of the University of Oxford. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE PRINCIPAL COUNCILS. 
 
 Bv J. H. Newman, M.A. 
 
 Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford. 
 
THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY {continued). 
 TIlE LIVES OF THE CONTIN*ENTAL REFORMERS. 
 
 No. I. LIFE OF MARTIN LUTHER. 
 
 By Hugh James Rose, B.D. 
 
 Christian Advocate in the University of Cambridge. 
 
 THE LATER DAYS OF THE JEWISH POLITY: 
 
 \\'ith a copious Introduction and Notes (chiefly derived from the Tal- 
 
 mudists and Rabbinical Writers). With a view to illustrate 
 
 the lianguage, the Manners, and general Ilistorv 
 
 cf the New Testament. 
 
 By Thomas Mitchell, Esq. A.M. 
 
 Late Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge 
 
 HISTORY OF THE CHURCH IN IRELAND. 
 
 By C. R. Eluington, D.D. 
 
 Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Dublin. 
 
 THE DIVINE ORIGIN OF THE CHRISTIAN REVELATION 
 
 demonstrated in an analytical Inquiry into the Evidence on which the 
 
 Belief of Cliristianity has been established. 
 
 By William Rowe Lyall, M.A. 
 
 Archdeacon of Colchester, and Rector of Fairstead and Weeley in Essex. 
 
 HISTORY OF THE REFORMED RELIGION IN FRANCE. 
 
 By Edward Smedlky, M.A. 
 
 Late Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. 
 
 ILLUSTRATIONS OF EASTERN MANNERS, SCRIPTURAL 
 
 PHRASEOLOGY, &c. 
 
 By Samuel Lke, B.D. F.R.S. M.R.A.S. 
 
 Regius Professor of Hebrew in the University of Cambridge. 
 
 HISTORY OF SECTS. 
 
 By F. E. Thompson, M.A. 
 
 Perpetual Curate of Brentford. 
 
 SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF LITURGIES: 
 
 comprising a Particular Account of the Liturgy of the Church of 
 England. 
 By Henry John Rose, B.D. 
 Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge 
 
 HISTORY OF THE CHURCH IN SCOTLAND. 
 
 By Michael Russell, LL.D. 
 
 Author of the ** Connexion of Sacred and Profane History. 
 
 THE LIFE OF GROTIUS. 
 
 By James Nichols, F.S.A. 
 
 Author of •* Arminianism and CalvinisT romiwred." 
 
^'h 
 
YA 03725 
 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CAUFORNIA LIBRARY