r (LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OP CAUFORNIA SAW Bit GO ' the College monographs THE COLLEGE MONOGRAPHS Edited and Illustrated by EDMUND H. NEW TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE W. W. ROUSE BALL. ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE R. F. SCOTT. KING'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE C. R. FAY. MAGDALEN COLLEGE, OXFORD THE PRESIDENT. NEW COLLEGE, OXFORD A. O. PRICKARD. MERTON COLLEGE, OXFORD REV. H. J. WHITE. ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE BY ROBERT FORSYTH \SCOTT FELLOW AND SENIOR BURSAR OF THE COLLEGE ILLUSTRATED BY EDMUND H. NEW 1907 : LONDON : J. M. DENT & CO. NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON 6^ CO. All Rights Reserved CONTENTS CHAP. I. THE COURTS AND BUILDINGS II. SOME INTERIORS . . <. . . . 13 III. THE HOSPITAL OF ST. JOHN (CIRCA 1135-1511) . . : . . 35 IV. THE FIRST CENTURY (1511-1612) . 40 V. THE SECOND CENTURY (1612-1716) 52 VI. THE THIRD CENTURY (1716-1815) 66 VII. THE CURRENT CENTURY . . 74 VIII. SOCIAL LIFE ... . .86 INDEX .... 109 VII LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS The Entrance Gateway . .' . Frontispiece PAGE Plan of College Buildings . . ' . x Bag of Flowers ; detail of Carving over Entrance Gateway . . . . 3 The Second and Third Courts from the Screens ...... 6 The Gatehouse from the Churchyard of All Saints . . . . . .12 Monument of Hugh Ashton in the Chapel . 19 The Hall from the Second Court . . 24 Interior of the Library . . . 34 The Old Bridge . . . . , 41 The Hall and Chapel Tower from the Second Court . . . . -53 The College Arms (in the Third Court] . 58 The Chapel Tower from the River . . 67 The College Chapel from the Round Church 75 The New Court from Trinity College Bridge 87 The " Bridge of Sighs ". . v . 98 viii CHAPTER I THE COURTS AND BUILDINGS ST. John's College was founded in 1511, in pursuance of the intentions of the Lady Margaret Beaufort, mother of King Henry VII. Approaching the College from the street we enter by the Great Gate. The gate- way with its four towers is the best example of the characteristic Cambridge gate, and dates from the foundation of the College. It is built of red brick (the eastern counties marble), dressed with stone. The street front of the College to the right and left remains in its original state, except that after the old chapel and infirmary of the Hospital of St. John (to which allusion will be made hereafter) were pulled down, the north end was completed by a block of lecture rooms in 1869. The front of the gate is richly deco- rated with heraldic devices, full of historical meaning and associations. The arms are those of the foundress ; the shield, France A ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE (ancient) and England quarterly, was the royal shield of the period ; the bordure, gobonny argent and azure (the argent in the upper dexter compartment), was the " difference " of the Beauforts, and is only slightly indicated. The supporters, two antelopes, come from Henry VI. There is no crest above the shield, and heraldic rules are against its use by a lady, but on her seal the Lady Margaret used the Beau- fort arms as above ensigned, with a coronet of roses and fleur-de-lis, out of which issues an eagle, displayed or ; and this device of coat and crest is used by the College. The arms on the gate are surrounded by badges, the Portcullis of the Beauforts, the Tudor, or Union, rose, each surmounted by a crown. Besides these we have daisies (marguerites), the badge of the Lady Margaret, and some flowers, which are not so easily identified. Certain vestments and embroideries, which belonged to the Lady Margaret, of which a list has been preserved, are described as " garnishede with sophanyes and my ladyes poisy," or, " with rede roses and syphanyes." The sophanye was an old English name for the Christmas rose, and there seems little doubt that these flowers on the gate are meant for Christmas roses. The carving on the right, under the portcullis, where these emblems seem to be growing out of something resembling a masonic apron, is very curious. Above the gate are two sets of rooms, 2 THE COURTS AND BUILDINGS The* upper set has been used from the beginning as the Treasury or Muniment Room of the College ; the set immediately above the arch is now an ordinary set of rooms. In this set resided, during his college career, Lord Thomas Howard, a son of the fourth Duke of Norfolk, after- BAG OF FLOWERS OVER ENTRANCE GATEWAY wards himself first Earl of Suffolk and Baron Howard de Walden. He fought against the Armada in 1588, and com- manded the expedition to the Azores in 1591 ; the fame of Sir Richard Grenville of the Revenge has somewhat eclipsed that of his leader in the latter case ; the reader may recall Tennyson's Ballad of the Fleet. To the left of the gate it will be observed that five windows on the first floor are of 3 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE larger size than the rest ; this was the original position of the Library ; the books were removed in 1616 to a room over the Kitchen, and later to the present Library. According to tradition Henry Kirke White, the poet, occupied, and died in, the rooms on the ground-floor next the tower ; he lies buried in the old churchyard of All Saints', across the street. Entering the gate the Hall and Kitchen face us, and preserve much of their original appearance. But right and left the changes have been great. The old Chapel was swept away in 1869 its foundations are marked out by cement ; at this time the Hall was lengthened, and a second orie.l window added. The range of buildings on the south was raised and faced with stone about 1775, when the craze for Italianising buildings was fashionable ; it was then in- tended to treat the rest of the Court in like manner, but fortunately the scheme was not carried out. If we walk along the south side of the Court we may notice on the underside of the lintel of G staircase the words, " Stag, Nov. 15, 1777." It seems that on that date a stag, pursued by the hunt, took refuge in the College, and on this stair- case ; the members of the College had just finished dinner when the stag and his pur- suers entered. On the next staircase, F, there is a passage leading to the lane with the Kitchen Offices, this passage is some- 4 THE COURTS AND BUILDINGS time* known as " The Staincoat " ; the passage leading from the Screens into the Kitchen is still sometimes called "The Staincoat," or "The Stankard." These curious names really mean the same thing. It appears that in times past a pole was kept, probably for carrying casks of beer, but on which the undergraduates seem also to have hoisted those of their number, or even servants, who had offended against the rules and customs of the College ; this pole was called the Stang, and the place or pass- age in which it was kept the Stangate Hole, with the above variations or corruptions. Reserving the Chapel for the present we pass through the Screens, the entrance to the Hall being on the right, to the Kitchen on the left. We enter the Second Court. This beautiful and stately Court was built between 1599 and 1600 (the date 1599 may be seen on the top of one of the water- pipes on the north side), the cost being in great part provided by Mary, Countess of Shrewsbury, a daughter of Sir William Cavendish by the celebrated Bess of Hard- wick, and wife of Gilbert, seventh Earl of Shrewsbury. The original drawings for the Court, and the contract for its con- struction, almost unique documents of their kind, are preserved in the Library. The whole of the first floor on the north side was at first used as a gallery for the Mas- ter's Lodge ; it is now used as a Combina- tion Room. Over the arch of the gate on 5 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE the western side of the Court is a statue of the Countess, with her shield (showing the arms of Talbot and Cavendish impaled); these were presented to the College by VIEW FROM THE SCREENS her nephew, William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle. A pleasing view of the Court is got by standing in the south-west corner and looking towards the Chapel Tower, with an afternoon sun the colouring and group- ing of the buildings is very effective. Passing through the arch we enter the Third Court ; this was built at various 6 THE COURTS AND BUILDINGS timeS during the seventeenth century. On the north we have the Library, the cost of which was chiefly provided by John Williams, a Fellow of the College, suc- cessively Dean of Westminster, Bishop of Lincoln, and Archbishop of York; he was also Lord Keeper of the Great Seal to James I. As originally built the Library occupied the upper floor only, the ground- floor being fitted up as rooms for the accommodation of the Fellows and scholars, on a special foundation of Bishop Williams, but this lower part is now all absorbed into the Library. The southern and western sides of the Court were built between 1669 and 1674, some part of the cost being pro- vided from College funds, the rest by dona- tions from members of the College. On the last or southern pier of the arcade, on the west side of the Court, there are the two inscriptions: "Flood, Oct. 27, 1762," "Flood, Feb. 10, 1795," recording what must have been highly inconvenient events at the time. The central arch on the western side of the Court has some prominence, and was probably intended from the first as the approach to a bridge. Towards the end of the seventeenth century Sir Christopher Wren was consulted on the subject, and a letter from him to the then Master, Dr. Gower, has been preserved. Sir Christo- pher's proposal was a curious one : he sug- gested that the course of the river Cam 7 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE should be diverted and carried in a straight line from the point where it bends near the Library of Trinity College. A new channel was to be dug, and a bridge built over this; the water was then to be sent down the new channel, and the old one filled up. He pointed out that this would give "a parterre to the river, a better access to the walks, and a more beautiful disposal of the whole ground." This scheme was, however, not carried out, but a stone bridge was built outside the range of the buildings on the site of an old wooden bridge, which then gave access to the grounds. This is the bridge which still exists; it was built, apparently from Wren's designs, under the superintendence of his pupil, Nicholas Hawksmoor. More than a century now passed before further building operations were undertaken. In 1825 tne College employed Mr. Thomas Rickman and his partner, Mr. H. Hutchinson, to prepare designs for a new Court, with from 100 to 1 20 sets of rooms. This work was started in 1827, and completed in 1831. The covered bridge connecting the old and new parts of the College was designed by Mr. Hutchinson ; it is popularly known as the " Bridge of Sighs." The style of this Court is Perpendicular Gothic. The site was un- suited for building operations, consisting mostly of washed and peaty soil; it had been known for generations as " the fish- ponds close." The modern concrete foun- THE COURTS AND BUILDINGS datidns were then unknown, and the plan adopted was to remove the peaty soil and to lay timber on the underlying gravel. On this an enormous mass of brickwork, forming vaulted cellars, was placed ; this rises above the river level, and the rooms are perfectly dry. The total cost of the building was 78,000, most of which was provided by borrowing. The repayment, extending over a number of years, involved considerable self-denial on the Fellows of the College, their incomes being materi- ally reduced for many years. Crossing the covered bridge and passing down the cloisters of the New Court, we enter the grounds by the centre gate; these extend right and left, being bounded on the east by the Cam, and separated from the grounds of Trinity by a ditch. From the old, or Wren's, bridge over the Cam two parallel walks extend along the front of the Court ; according to tra- dition the broader and higher was reserved for members of the College, the lower for College servants. At one time an avenue of trees extended from the bridge to the back gate, but the ravages of time have removed all but a few trees. At the western end of the walk we have on the left the (private) Fellows' garden, known as "The Wilderness," an old-world pleasance, left as nearly as may be in a state of nature. Towards the end of the eighteenth century the 9 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE College employed the celebrated Mr. Lancelot (" capability ") Brown to lay out the grounds and Wilderness. The planta- tion in the latter was arranged so as to form a cathedral, with nave, aisles, and tran- sept, but here also old age and storms have brought down many of the trees. On the right, opposite to the Wilderness, there is an orchard, the subject of much legend. One popular story is that this orchard formed the subject of a bequest to " St. John's College," and that the testator, being an Oxford man, was held by the Courts to have intended to benefit the College in his own University. As a matter of prosaic fact, the orchard origi- nally belonged to Merton College, Oxford, being part of the original gift of their founder, Walter de Merton, and it was acquired by St. John's College by ex- change in the early years of the nineteenth century. The long walk terminates in a massive gate with stone pillars, surmounted by eagles. Outside and across the road is the Eagle Close, used as the College cricket and football field. The visitor in returning should cross the old bridge, thus getting a view of the Bridge of Sighs, and re-enter the College by the archway on the left. 10 'Trie (fate house: S*Jofm' To the joyner for setting up the rood, id. ; A new graell printed in parch- ment 40*. ; 1556, In Spanish money given to the goldsmyth by Mr Willan to make a pixe to the highe Aultar, 24.5. lid. ; A redde purple velvet cope, with the border of imagrie, having the assumption of our Ladie behinde and three little angels about her and the greater being full of floure de luces, 4.6s. &d. ; 1557, To William Allom for two antiphoners, one masse book and hymnal and processioners 6 13*. 4^." 46 THE FIRST CENTURY " 1558, To John Waller and his man for a dayes working pulling down the hye Altar and carrying it away 2od. ; For pulling down the aulter in Mr Ashton's Chapel 6^. ; 1563, Received for certain old Albes and other popishe Trashe, sold out of the Revystry the last yere, 26;. lod. ; Paid to Mr Baxter for ten Geneva psalters and six service psalters, bought at Christmas last, 225." This last entry gives us the key to the troubles at St. John's ; the Marian exiles had returned with strong Calvinistic lean- ings. The unrest was, of course, not confined to St. John's, but was general throughout the University. But for the greater part of the reign of Elizabeth there was a strong leaning toward Puritanism in the College. There was a rapid succession of Masters, most of whom were thrust on the College by Court influence ; and about this time the Fellows of St. John's acquired the reputation of being " cunning practi- tioners " in the art of getting rid of unpopular Masters. Queen Elizabeth visited Cambridge in August 1564, and was received with all honour. She rode into the Hall of St. John's on her palfrey and listened to a speech from Mr. Humphrey Bohun, one of the Fellows, in which for the last time the restitution of the Lady Margaret's estates was hinted at, without result. Richard Longworth, a man of Presby- terian sympathies, was at this time Master. 47 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE In 1565 he, with the Fellows and scholars, appeared in Chapel without the surplice. Lord. Burghley, ns Chancellor of the Uni- versity, wrote a sharply worded letter to Longworth, expressing his grief that such a thing should happen in " my dear College of St. John's " ; adding, " truly no mishap in all my service did ever plunge me more grievously." Fortunately affairs were in strong and capable hands. With the authority and in the name of Queen Elizabeth, Whitgift, at this time Master of Trinity, afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury, and Cecil pro- vided new statutes for the University in 1570, and for St. John's in 1580. By these much more power was put in the hands of the Master, and government rendered easier to a resolute man. Matters improved, if not at once, at least gradually, and the Anglican rule became firmly established. But during the master- ship of William Whitaker (1586-1595) we still hear of troubles with " Papists." Whitaker was a learned scholar and an acute theologian, but he does not seem to have been a ruler of men or a judge of character. He got involved in an unfortu- nate dispute with Everard Digby, one of the Fellows, a man of considerable literary reputation, but of a turbulent disposition. Whitaker, who clearly wanted to get rid of Digby, seized upon the pretext that his bill for a month's commons, amounting 48 THE FIRST CENTURY to 8s. 7^d., was left unpaid, and deprived Digby of his fellowship. An appeal was lodged with Whitgift and Cecil, who ordered Whitaker to reinstate Digby. Whitaker replied that Digby was a Papist, was wont to blow a horn in the Courts and to holloa after it, and that he had threatened to put the President in the stocks ! He seems to have succeeded in getting rid of Digby for good. On the death of Whitaker in 1595, Richard Clayton became Master. If not a brilliant scholar, he commanded respect, and the tenor of many letters which have come down from that time shows that the Fellows in residence were on good terms with each other, and with those of the Society who had gone out into the world. The College was prosperous, and the build- ing of the Second Court was the visible sign of returned efficiency. Clayton lived on into the reign of King James L, dying 2nd May 1612 ; besides being Master of St. John's, he was also Dean of Peterborough and a Prebendary of Lincoln. During this period the College enjoyed a considerable reputation as a training ground for medical men. Thomas Linacre, phy- sician to Henry VIII., founded in 1534 a medical lectureship in the College, endow- ing it with some property in London. The stipend of the lecturer was to be 1 2 a year, no mean sum in these days being, in fact, the same as the statutable stipend of 49 D ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE the Master. In the Elizabethan statutes special and detailed provisions are made for the continuance of the lectureship. These lay down that the lecturer must be versed in the works of Aristotle, and that he should lecture on the works of Galen, which Linacre had translated. The effect of the foundation was to attract a number of medical students to the College, many of whom seem to have obtained fellowships, for we find the Fellows petitioning Queen Elizabeth, while her code of statutes was under consideration, that Divines should be preferred to Physicians in the election of Senior Fellows ; otherwise, they submitted, an undue proportion of Physicians would get on the seniority and rule the College. Further, they asked that the medical Fellows, as some return for their privi- leges, should attend on poor students free of charge. That the College school of medicine was a noted one is confirmed by the fact that three successive Presidents of the Royal College of Physicians were Fel- lows of St. John's: Richard Smith (1585- 1589), William Baronsdale (1589-1600), and William Gilbert (1600-1601). Smith and Gilbert were physicians to Queen Elizabeth ; Baronsdale and Gilbert had been Senior Bursars of the College. Of these Gilbert is the most celebrated ; his treatise, De Magnete, is a scientific classic. Galileo spoke of Gilbert as " great to a degree which might be envied." Francis 50 THE FIRST CENTURY Bacon mentions the book with applause, and Hallam describes Gilbert as "at once the father of experimental philosophy in this island, and by a singular felicity and acuteness of genius, the founder of theories which have been revived after the lapse of ages, and are almost universally received into the creed of science." Gilbert, who always signs his name Gilberd or Gylberd in the College books, was Senior Bursar of the College in 1569, and President in the succeeding year. Amongst others who have held the Lin- acre lectureship, and attained to scientific distinction, was Henry Briggs, who was appointed lecturer in 1592. He afterwards became Gresham Professor of Geometry and Savilian Professor at Oxford. He took up Napier's discovery of logarithms ; the idea of tables of logarithims having 10 for their base, and the calculation of the first table of the kind, is due to him. THE SECOND CENTURY 1612-1716 THE second century of the College his- tory opened quietly. Owen Gwyn was elected Master by the choice of the Fellows ; John Williams, then a Fellow, afterwards Lord Keeper, Dean of West- minster, Bishop of Lincoln, and Archbishop of York, exerting himself on Gwyn's behalf. It appears that Williams in after years re- pented of the choice, and Thomas Baker, the historian of the College, speaks slightingly of Gwyn. Still, under his rule the College flourished, and Williams himself marked the period by providing the greater part of the funds for the new Library. King James I. and Prince Charles (after- wards Charles I.) frequently visited the University ; James holding his Court at Trinity, but being entertained at St. John's. On one of these occasions, comparing the great Court of Trinity with the two then existing Courts of St. John's, he is said to have remarked that there was no greater difference between the two Societies than between a shilling and two sixpences. With the advent of the Stuart kings the 52 THE SECOND CENTURY practice arose of sending mandatory letters to Colleges, directing the election of named persons to fellowships. In theory it may have been correct enough ; the statutes as enacted by Queen Elizabeth reserved to herself and her successors the power of rescinding or altering them. To direct that the statutory provisions as to elections should be dispensed with in favour of an individual was thus within the sovereign's power, however inconvenient it might prove in practice. One of the special grievances at St. John's was that King James directed the College to elect a Scotchman, George Seaton, M.A., to a fellowship, though there was none then actually vacant. The College obeyed, informing his Majesty that they had made their statutes wink to fulfil his bidding, and maintained an extra Fellow for a time. The practice was, however, fol- lowed by others ; and Gwyn seems to have been deluged with letters from persons in high places, begging for his favour at elec- tions. At some Colleges the device of " pre-elections " seems to have been resorted to ; a promising man being elected to the next fellowship which should be vacant. Thus, when the vacancy became known, the College could, with a clear conscience, say that it had been already filled up ; there is, however, no trace of this practice at St. John's. On Gwyn's death in 1633 there was a disputed election to the mastership, which 55 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE Charles I. settled by nominating William Beale. Beale was originally a Trinity man, but had been for about a year Master of Jesus. He was a supporter of Laud ; he em- bellished the Chapel, and introduced a more ornate ritual ; under his influence St. John's seems to have been the only College at Cambridge which fully complied with Laud's instructions. Thus when the Puritans got the upper hand, Beale and his College were the subject of their displeasure. In 1642 King Charles applied to the University for supplies. The contribution of St. John's was 150 in money and 2065 ounces " grocers weight " of silver plate. The list of the pieces of plate and of the donors' names is but melancholy reading ; suffice it to say that among those sent were pieces bearing the names of Thomas Went- worth, Lord Strafford, and of Thomas Fairfax. The fact that this plate actually reached the King did not endear the College to the parliamentary party. Oliver Crom- well surrounded the College, took Dr. Beale a prisoner, and, to equalise matters, con- fiscated the communion plate and other valuables. Beale, after some imprisonment and wan- dering, escaped from England and became chaplain to Lord Cottington and Sir Edward Hyde (afterwards Lord Clarendon) in their embassy to Spain ; he died at Madrid, and was there secretly buried. A number of the Fellows were also ejected, and for some 56 THE SECOND CENTURY time'the College was used as a prison. The Chapel was stripped of the obnoxious orna- ments, and other damage done. A little bundle of papers labelled " Receipts for Army taxes during the Commonwealth " still reposes, as a memento of these days, in the Muniment Room. St. John's, which dabbled in Presbyterian doctrines during the days of Elizabeth, now had these imposed upon it by superior authority. The two Commonwealth Masters, John Arrowsmith (1644-1653) and Anthony Tuckney (1653-1661), were able men of Puritan austerity, the rule of the latter being the more strict ; judging from the after careers of its members, the College was certainly capably directed. A well- authenticated College tradition relates that when, at an election, the President called upon the Master to have regard to the " godly," Tuckney replied that no one showed greater regard for the truly godly than himself, but that he was determined to choose none but scholars ; adding, with practical wisdom, "They may deceive me in their godliness ; they cannot in their scholarship." On the Restoration, Dr. Peter Gunning, afterwards Bishop of Ely, was made Master ; and the Earl of Manchester, who, as an officer of the Parliament, was the means of ejecting many of the Fellows, now directed that some of them should be restored to their places. An interesting College custom 57 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE dates from this period : on the 2gth of May in each year the College butler deco- rates the Hall and Kitchen with fresh oak boughs; there is no order to that effect, but " it has always been done." The rest of this century of the College existence, with the exception of one exciting THE COLLEGE ARMS event, passed quietly enough. Such troubles as there were in College were but eddies of the storms in the world outside. Of the " seven Bishops " sent to the Tower by King James II. in 1688, three were of St. John's : Francis Turner, Bishop of Ely (who had been Master of the College from 1670 to 1679) ; John Lake, Bishop of 58 THE SECOND CENTURY Chichester ; and Thomas White, Bishop of Peterborough. The event of College interest was the fate of the nonjuring Fellows. The Non- jurors were those who, on various grounds, honourable enough, declined to take the oath of allegiance to King William and Queen Mary. Under the law they were liable to be deprived of their places and emoluments. At St. John's twenty Fellows and eight scholars took up the nonjuring position. In the rest of the University there were but fourteen in all, and the same number at the University of Oxford. No explanation seems to be forthcoming as to why there was this preponderance of opinion at St. John's. It is difficult to be- lieve that it was enthusiasm for the cause of James II. ; for when in 1687 that King directed the University to admit Father Alban Francis, a Benedictine monk, to the degree of M.A. without making the sub- scription or taking the oaths required for a degree, Thomas Smoult and John Billers, members of the College (the latter after- wards a Nonjuror), maintained the right of the University to refuse the degree before the notorious Judge Jeffreys, after the Vice- Chancellor and Isaac Newton had been silenced. Humphrey Gower was at this time Master of the College ; he was of Puritan origin, and entered the College during the Commonwealth. After the Restoration he 59 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE joined the Church of England, and though his sympathies were with the Nonjurors, he took the oaths and retained his master- ship after the flight of King James. He had been for less than six months Master of Jesus before becoming Master of St. John's. Abraham de la Pryme, a member of St. John's, has handed down an irreverent jest on his appointment. " Our master, they say, is a mighty, high, proud man. . . . He came from Jesus College to be master here, and he was so sevear that he was commonly called the divel of Jesus ; and when he was made master here some unlucky scholars broke this jest upon him that now the divel was entered into the heard of swine ; for us Johnians are abusively called hoggs." In 1693 the Court of King's Bench issued a mandamus calling upon Gower to remove those Fellows who had not taken the oath. Defence upon the merits of the case there was none ; but Gower or his legal advisers opposed the mandate with great skill on technical points, and after much litigation the Court had to admit that its procedure was irregular, and the matter dropped for some twenty-four years. During this period some of the Fellows in question died, others ceded their fellowships owing to the com- bined action of the general law and the College statutes. Under the latter Fellows were bound, when of proper standing, to proceed to the B.D. degree, but the oath of allegiance was required of those who took 60 THE SECOND CENTURY the degree, and so fellowships were forfeited. Thomas Baker, the historian, who was one of the Nonjurors, had taken the B.D. degree before 1688, so this cause did not operate in his case. But on the accession of King George I., an abjuration oath was required, and the meshes of the net being now smaller, the then Master, Dr. Jenkin, had no other course but to eject Baker and others. The College did all it could to soften the blow, and allowed Baker to reside in College until his death in 1740. He worked unweariedly at his manuscript collections and at the history of the College. The latter was first published in 1869, under the editorship of Professor John E. B. Mayor ; with the editor's additions it forms a record of a College such as almost no other foundation can show. Baker's learning and accuracy are undoubted ; but it may be permitted (even to a member of his College) to hint that Baker's judgments are a little severe, and his views somewhat narrow. One notable improvement in the College records dates from this century. In early days no record was made of the names of those who joined the College. The statutes of King Henry VIII. enjoined that a register should be kept of all those admitted to scholarships and fellowships or College offices. This was begun in 1545, and has been continued to the present time. The entries of scholars and Fellows are in the autograph of those admitted, and if they 61 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE possessed no other interest, have that of providing numerous examples of contem- porary handwriting. But of those not admitted on the foundation, or of those admitted prior to 1545, there is no official College record. Dr. Owen Gwyn and the seniors of his day passed a rule that " the register of the College should have a book provided him wherein he should from time to time write and register the names, parents, county, school, age, and tutor of every one to be admitted to the College." This was com- menced in January 1629-30, and has been continued, with varying care and exactness, ever since. It seems probable that the initiative in this matter was due to Gwyn, as few Masters have so carefully preserved their official correspondence. Just before this general register com- menced, three notable men joined the College : Thomas Wentworth, afterwards Earl of Strafford ; Thomas Fairfax, after- wards Lord Fairfax, the victor at Naseby ; and Lucius Gary, Viscount Falkland, who fell in Newbury fight in September 1643. Complimentary letters to the first and last of these, with the replies, have been pre- served. Falkland, in his reply, complains , that of the titles given to him by the College " that which I shold most willingly have acknowledged and mought with most justice clayme you were not pleased to vouchsafe me, that of a St. John's man." 62 THE SECOND CENTURY Of others who entered we may name : Sir Ingram Hopton, son of Ralph, first Baron Hopton, who entered as a Fellow Commoner I2th May 1631. Sir Ingram fell at the battle of Winceby, nth October 1643. He there unhorsed Oliver Cromwell in a charge, and knocked him down again as he rose, but was himself killed. Titus Gates, " the infamous," first entered at Caius 2Qth June 1667, migrating to St. John's, where he entered 2nd February 1 668-69. Thomas Baker for once abandons his decorous reticence and states of Oates : " He was a lyar from the beginning, he stole and cheated his taylor of a gown, which he denied with horrid imprecations, and afterwards at a communion, being ad- monisht and advised by his Tutor, confest the fact." Matthew Prior, the poet, was both scholar and Fellow of the College, holding his fellowship until his death. Robert Herrick, though he graduated at Trinity Hall, was sometime a Fellow Commoner here. Thomas Forster of Adderstone, general to the " Old Pretender," and commander of the Jacobite army in 1715, entered the College as a Fellow Commoner 3rd July 1700. Brook Taylor, well known to mathematicians as the discoverer of "Taylor's theorem," entered as a Fellow Commoner 3rd April 1701. While David Mossom of Greenwich, who entered the College as a sizar 5th June 1705, after 63 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE being ordained, emigrated to America, and became rector of St. Peter's Church, New Kent County, Virginia. He was the officiating clergyman at the mar- riage of George Washington in St. Peter's Church. We get an amusing glimpse of the importance of the Master of a Col- lege in the following anecdote : " In the year 1712 my old friend, Matthew Prior, who was then Fellow of St. John's, and who not long before had been employed by the Queen as her Plenipotentiary at the Court of France, came to Cambridge ; and the next morn- ing paid a visit to the Master of his own College. The Master (Dr. Jenkin) loved Mr. Prior's principles, had a great opinion of his abilities, and a respect for his character in the world ; but then he had much greater respect for himself. He knew his own dignity too well to suffer a Fellow of his College to sit down in his presence. He kept his seat himself, and let the Queen's Ambassador stand. Such was the temper, not of a Vice-Chancellor, but of a simple Master of a College. I remember, by the way, an extempore epi- gram of Matt's on the reception he had there met with. We did not reckon in those days that he had a very happy turn for an epigram ; but the occasion was tempting ; and he struck it off as he was walking from St. John's College to the 64 THE SECOND CENTURY Rose, "where we dined together. It was addressed to the Master : " ' I stood, Sir, patient at your feet, Before your elbow chair ; But make a bishop's throne your seat, I'll kneel before you there. One only thing can keep you down, For your great soul too mean ; You'd not, to mount a bishop's throne, Pay homage to the Queen.' " THE THIRD CENTURY 1716-1815 THE third century of the College history coincides roughly with the .eighteenth century. It was not a period of very high ideals, and " privilege " was in full force. For the first time in the College registers men are entered as " Noblemen." These were allowed to proceed to the M.A. degree direct in two years without passing through the inter- mediate stage of B.A. The College was also full of Fellow Commoners, who sat with the Fellows at the High Table in Hall ; until the close of the century these do not seem to have proceeded to any degree. The other two classes were the pensioners, who paid their way, and the sizars. A sizar was definitely attached to a Fellow or Fellow Commoner, and in return for duties of a somewhat menial character passed through his College course on reduced terms. Among other duties, a sizar had, with some of the scholars, to wait at table, a service not abolished until 6th May 1786. Speaking in general terms, the College 66 THE CHAPEL TOWER FROM THE RIVER. THE THIRD CENTURY seems gradually to have acquired the re- putation of being the Tory College in the Whig University ; it became exceedingly fashionable, and towards the end of the century had more students in residence than any other College. At the same time its reputation for efficiency was very high. This was due to the policy of Dr. William Samuel Powell, Master from 1765 to 1775. He introduced various administra- tive changes on the financial side of College management, and also started annual ex^ aminations in the College, then a novelty in the University. These examinations were not very severe, and to the some- what overtaxed undergraduate of the present day might seem almost trivial. They were not competitive, there was no order of merit, but no one seems to have been exempt ; their object was simply to test the knowledge of the students. The suc- cess of the plan attracted much attention ; it was proposed to institute similar exami- nations for the University at large, but Powell opposed this on the ground that candidates ought to be examined by those who taught them. From this date it would appear that Fellow Commoners, at St. John's at least, began to take degrees in the University. During Powell's mastership an observa- tory was established on the top of the western gateway of the Second Court, and regular astronomical observations taken. 69 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE Two sets of observations there made by Fellows of the College have been pub- lished ; one set made by William Ludlam in 1767 and 1768, the other by Thomas Catton between 1796 and 1826, the latter being published by the Royal Astronomical Society in 1854. We find members of the College taking part in all the movements of the time. In the rebellion of 1745, James Dawson, a captain in the Manchester Regiment, was taken prisoner at Carlisle, and executed in July 1746 on Kennington Common ; while Robert Ganton, afterwards a clergyman, was excused one term's residence in the University, during which, as one of " his majesty's Royal Hunters," he was fighting the rebels. Charles Churchill, satirist, was for a short time a member of the College in 1748. William Wordsworth, afterwards Poet Laureate, entered the College as a sizar, and was admitted a foundress' scholar 6th November 1787. Many adopted military careers ; of these we may mention George, first Marquis Townshend, who joined the College in 1741, afterwards entered the army, and was present at Fontenoy and Culloden ; he went with Wolfe to Canada, and took over the command when Wolfe fell. Daniel Hoghton entered in 1787, he also became a soldier, and was one of Wellington's men in the Peninsular War ; he was killed 70 THE THIRD CENTURY at the battle of Albuera, being then a major-general. Of another type were William Wilber- force (entered 1776) and Thomas Clarkson (1779), whose names will always be asso- ciated in connection with the abolition of slavery. The saintly Henry Martyn, Senior Wrangler in 1801 and Fellow of the College, went out as a missionary to India in 1805, and died at Tokat in Persia in 1812. There have been many missionary sons of the College since his day, but his self-denial greatly impressed his contem- poraries, and Sir James Stephen speaks of him as " the one heroic name which adorns the annals of the Church of England from the days of Elizabeth to our own." With Martyn curiously enough is associated in College annals another name, that of Henry John Temple, third Viscount Palmerston, sometime Prime Minister of England ; for Martyn and Temple appear as officers of the College company of volunteers in the year 1803. Thomas Denman, afterwards Lord Chief Justice, entered the College in 1796 ; he resided in the Second Court, staircase G, at the top. When he brought up his son, the Hon. George Denman, to Trinity he pointed the rooms out to him, and the latter pointed them out to the present writer, "in order that the oral tradition might be preserved." Alexander John Scott, who, as private 7 1 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE secretary and interpreter to Lord Nelson, was present on the Victory at Trafalgar, entered the College in 1786, and became a scholar of the College 3rd November 1789. Fletcher Norton, Speaker of the House of Commons from 1770 to 1780, and first Lord Grantley, entered the College in 1734. With him, in a way, was connected John Home (afterwards Home Tooke), who entered in 1754 ; for Home, for purposes of his own, libelled Fletcher Norton when Speaker. Home Tooke's stormy career belongs rather to political than College history ; but it is worth noting that when he presented him- self at Cambridge for the M.A. degree, and the granting of this was opposed in the senate on the ground that he had traduced the clergy in his writings, the members of St. John's, headed by Dr. Richard Beadon, then Public Orator, after- wards Bishop of Bath and Wells, carried the grace for the degree. Home and Beadon entered the College in the same year. We have already mentioned Charles Churchill. Another Johnian poet of this period was William Mason, who entered the College in 1742. Mason afterwards became a Fellow of Pembroke, where he was the intimate friend of Thomas Gray. As the biographer of Gray he is perhaps better remembered than for his own poetry, though during his lifetime he enjoyed con- siderable fame. 7 2 THE THIRD CENTURY A somewhat unusual career was that of William Smith, who entered the College from Eton in 1747, but left without taking a degree. He is reported to have snapped an unloaded pistol at one of the Proctors, and rather than submit to the punishment which the College authorities thought proper to inflict, left the University. He became an actor, arid was very popular in his day, being known as " Gentleman Smith." He was associated with David Garrick, and Smith's admirers held that he fell little short of his master in the art. The reputation of the College as a medical school was maintained by Dr. William Heberden, who entered in 1724. Heberden attended Samuel Johnson in his last illness, and Johnson described him as " ultimus Romanorum, the last of our learned physicians." A description which may be amplified by saying that Heberden was in a way the first of the modern physicians. 73 THE CURRENT CENTURY THE time has probably not yet come when a satisfactory account of Col- lege and University development during the nineteenth century can be written. The changes have been fundamental, involving perhaps a change of ideal as well as of method. In early days the College was filled with men saturated with the spirit of the Renaissance ; casting aside the studies of the Middle Ages, they returned to the literature of Greece and Rome. The ideals of the present day are not less high, but more complex and less easy to state briefly ; the aim is perhaps rather to add to know- ledge than to acquire it for its own sake alone. For the first half of the century College life was still regulated by the statutes of Elizabeth. These were characterised by over-cautious and minute legislation. Now that they are superseded, the chief feeling is' one of surprise that a system of laws, in- tended to be unchangeable, should have endured so long in presence of the changing character of the wants and habits of man- kind. 74 THE CURRENT CENTURY It must be remembered that each member of the corporate body, Master, Fellow, or Scholar, on admission, each officer on his appointment, bound himself by oaths of great solemnity to observe these statutes and to seek no dispensation from their provisions. To a more logical race the difficulties must have proved intolerable the practical Englishman found his own solution. The forms were observed juramenti gratia, but much practical work was supplemental to the statutes. This could be illustrated in more than one way the most interest- ing is the development of the educational side and the tutorial system. The statutes prescribed the appointment of certain lecturers even the subjects of their lectures. Space need not be occupied in showing that such provisions soon be- came obsolete. The working solution was found in the tutorial system. In early days it was contemplated and prescribed that each Fellow should have the care of two or three students, living" with them, teaching them daily ; the exact date when this system passed away has not been traced with any certainty, but gradually the number of Fellows taking individual charge of the undergraduates diminished until it became reduced to two or three. Those in charge became known as Tutors, and with each Tutor was associated one or two others called Assistant Tutors or Lecturers. A 77 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE charge was made to the undergraduates for tuition, and the svim so received was shared by the Tutors and their assistants. But the Tutor was not a College officer in the eye of the statutes, nor the money received for tuition treated as part of the College revenues. The system worked, be- cause it was meant to work, and as it was not subject to obsolete rules could be modified and adapted to changing con- ditions. So long as the chief subjects of study were few in number, practically restricted to classics and mathematics, Col- lege provision for teaching was possible and simple. The multiplication of studies, the needs of the studies generally known as the Natural Sciences, with their expensive laboratories and equipment, are entailing further changes, and the tendency, more especially in the newer subjects, is to centralise teaching under the control of University professors and teachers. The subject is one of great interest, but cannot be further touched upon here. To return to the history of St. John's. Dr. James Wood became Master in 1815. He was a man of humble origin, a native of Holcombe, in the parish of Bury, Lanca- shire. According to a well-authenticated tradition he "kept," as an undergraduate, in a garret in staircase O in the Second Court, and studied in the evening by the light of the rush candle which lit the staircase, with his feet in straw, not being able to afford 78 THE CURRENT CENTURY fire or light. He became a successful and popular College Tutor, and his mathematical writings were long the standard text-books in the University. At the time of his death in 1839 he held, with his mastership, the Deanery of Ely and the Rectory of Fresh- water in the Isle of Wight. He made the College his residuary legatee, but during his life had handed over large sums for College purposes, and the total of his gifts cannot have been less than 60,000. In Wood's time we find the first move- ment in favour of change taken by the College itself. St. John's then suffered under a specially awkward restriction arising from the joint effect of the general statutes and the trusts of private foundations. By the statutes not more than two Fellows could come from any one county in Eng- land, or more than one from each diocese in Wales. There were thirty-two foundation Fellows, and twenty-one founded by private bene- factors, the latter having all the privileges and advantages of the former. Each of these private foundations had its own special restriction ; the holders were to be perhaps of founder's name or kin, or to come from certain specified counties, parishes, or schools. The effect of these special restrictions was that many fellowships had to be filled by men possessing the special qualification with- out, perhaps, any great intellectual distinc- tion. But once a county was " full " no 79 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE Fellow could be elected who had been born in -that county ; and even if a vacancy occurred a promising man might be again cut out by some special restriction. Dr. Wood and the Fellows addressed themselves to this point and obtained in 1820 the Royal consent to a statute throwing open the foundress' fellowships without restriction as to county ; the private foundations were left untouched, but the College was em- powered to transfer a Fellow on the found- ress' foundation to one of the special foundations, if qualified. Dr. Wood was succeeded as Master by Dr. Ralph Tatham, whose father and grand- father (of the same names) had been members of the College. He was Public Orator of the University from 1809 to 1836, an office for which he was well qualified by a singular dignity of person and courtesy of manner. " He brought forth butter," said the wags, "in a lordly dish." In the year 1837 the Earl of Radnor and others raised the ques- tion of University reform, and tried to induce the House of Lords to pass a bill for the appointment of a University Commission. In the end the matter was shelved, the friends of the University undertaking that the Col- leges, with the approval of their Visitors, should prepare new statutes for the assent of the Crown. The change in St. John's was opposed by some ultra-conservative Fel- lows, who urged that as they were bound by oath to observe and uphold the statutes, 80 THE CURRENT CENTURY and to seek no dispensation from them, they were precluded from asking for any change. The Bishop of Ely, however, gently put this objection on one side, and the statutes then prepared were approved by Queen Victoria in 1849. The more ardent reformers have described this code as merely legalising the customs and " abuses " which had grown up around the Elizabethan statutes without introducing any effective change. On the death of Dr. Tatham (igth Janu- ary 1857), Dr. William Henry Bateson was elected Master ; he had been Senior Bursar of the College from 1846, and Public Orator of the University from 1848. Dr. Bateson was a man of scholarly tastes, but he was above all a practical man of affairs and of broad views. He served on more than one University Commission appointed to ex- amine into and report upon the University and Colleges. The College statutes were twice revised during his mastership; the first code becoming law in 1860, the second was prepared during his lifetime, though it did not become law till a year after his death. These statutes are much less interesting reading than the early statutes, though un- doubtedly more useful. While aiming at precision in the matter of rights and duties, they leave great freedom in matters of study, discipline, and administration. All local restrictions on scholarships and fellowships have been abolished. The government of the College is entrusted to a Council of ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE twelve, elected by the Fellows, and presided over by the Master ; a simple method has been provided of altering them if necessary. Independently of the changes thus intro- duced the College, on its own initiative, was providing for the newer studies. In 1853 a chemical laboratory was built, and a lecturer in chemistry appointed, and other lecturers appointed from time to time as the scope of University teaching was widened. St. John's at an early date began to elect men to scholarships and fellowships for Natural Science. In all this we may trace the influence of Dr. Bateson, one of whose guiding principles was to widen and increase the teaching power of the College, and to reward intellectual distinction of any kind. Dr. Bateson died 2yth March 1881, and was succeeded by Dr. Charles Taylor, the present Master. Of men who have added lustre to the College roll of worthies we may mention Sir John F. W. Herschel, the astronomer, who was Senior Wrangler in 1813, and died in 1871, laden with all the honours which scientific and learned bodies could bestow upon him ; he lies buried in Westminster Abbey close to the tomb of Newton. John Couch Adams, Senior Wrangler in 1843, in July 1841, while yet an undergraduate, resolved to investigate the irregularities in the motion of the planet Uranus, with the view of determining whether they might be attributed to an undiscovered planet. The 82 THE CURRENT CENTURY memorandum he made of his resolve is, as has been stated, now in the College Library. It is a matter of history how Adams carried out his purpose, and how through a series of unlucky accidents he did not get the sole credit for his discovery of the planet Neptune. Adams became a Fellow of the College in 1843, but had to vacate his fellowship in 1852 as he was not in orders. The College tried to induce a Mr. Blakeney, who then held one of the very few fellowships tenable by a layman, to resign his fellowship and make way for Adams ; offering to pay him tor the rest of his life an income equal to that of his fellowship. Mr. Blakeney, how- ever, refused, and a fellowship was found for Mr. Adams at Pembroke College, which he held till his death. It is perhaps a delicate matter to allude to those still living, but two may perhaps be mentioned. The Hon. Charles A. Parsons by his development of the steam turbine has revolutionised certain departments of engineering. Dairoku Kikuchi, the first Japanese student to come to Cambridge, after graduating in 1877, in the same year as Mr. Parsons, returned to Japan, and has held many offices, including that of Minister of Education, in his native country. We may say that the changes introduced in the nineteenth century have restored to the College its national character, admitting to the full privileges of a University career certain classes of students who had been 83 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE gradually excluded. During the reigns of Henry VIII., Edward VI., Mary, and Elizabeth, there was always a part of the nation, Protestant or Roman Catholic, which found the entry barred to it. The establishment of the Anglican rule in the reign of Elizabeth led to the exclusion of Roman Catholics, and for three hundred years the doors of the University were closed to them. The Civil Wars, the Commonwealth, and the Restoration produced religious difficulties of another kind; the wholesale ejections in 1644 and 1660 testify to the troubles men had to face for conscience' sake. After the Restoration the Puritan, the Protestant Dissenter, was excluded with the Romanist. In the eighteenth century a certain variety was introduced by the entry of students from the West Indies, sons of planters ; one or two individuals came from the American colonies. The constant wars drew off men to military careers, and the religious movements towards the close of the century attracted men, after leaving College, to Unitarianism or Wesleyanism. The celebrated Rowland Hill was a mem- ber of the College ; Francis Okeley, after leaving, became a Moravian or a Mystic. Such dissenters as entered the College, and they were very few, were obliged to leave without graduating. The removal of all religious tests has 84 THE CURRENT CENTURY thus restored to the ancient Universities a national character they had not possessed since the early days of Henry VIII., when all could come, as all were practically of the same faith. Thus a wider field is open to the College 'to draw on, not only in the British Islands, but in all its colonies and dependencies. On the other hand, it is no less true that her sons are to be found more widely scat- tered. A hundred and fifty years ago one could say of a selected group of men that the majority would become clergymen or schoolmasters, a few would become barris- ters, others would return to their country estates, one or two might enter the army ; with that we should have exhausted the probabilities. Now there is probably not a career open to educated men in which members of the College are not to be found ; the State in every department, civil, ecclesiastical, or military, enlists her sons in its service. The rise of scientific industries has opened new careers to trained men. We talk of the spacious days of Elizabeth ; if space itself has not increased it is at least more permeated with men who owe their early training to the foundation of the Lady Margaret. SOCIAL LIFE HITHERTO we have confined our- selves to an outline of the College history on what may be called its official side. In what follows we deal briefly with some features of the life of the place. The original, and perhaps the chief, purpose of the College in the eyes of those who founded it was practically that it should form a training ground for the clergy. The statutes of King Henry VIII. distinctly lay down that theology is the goal to which philosophy and all other studies lead, and that none were to be elected Fellows who did not propose to study theology. The statutes of Elizabeth provided a certain elasticity by prescribing that those Fellows who did not enter priests' orders within six years should vacate their fellowships ; but that two Fellows might be allowed, by the Master and a majority of the Senior Fellows, to devote themselves to the study of medi- cine. King Charles I. in 1635 allowed a like privilege to be granted from thenceforth to two Fellows who were to study law. These privileges were not always popular, and we occasionally find the clerical Fellows 86 THE NEW COURT SOCIAL LIFE complaining that while the duties of teach- ing and catechising were laid on them, a man who had held one of the law or medical fellowships sometimes took orders late in life and then claimed presentation to a College benefice in virtue of his seniority as a Fellow, having in the meantime escaped the drudgery to which the Fellow in orders had been subject. The emoluments of members of the Society in early times were very modest, and as prices rose became quite inadequate ; the amounts being named in the College statutes were incapable of alteration, and indirect means were taken to provide relief. In Bishop Fisher's time it was considered that an endowment of 6 a year sufficed to found a fellowship, and ^3 a year to found a scholarship. The statutable stipend of the Master was only 12 a year, though he had some other allowances, the total amount of which was equally trivial. James Pilk- ington, Master from 1559 to 1561, when he became Bishop of Durham, wrote to Lord Burghley on the subject of his suc- cessor, stating that whoever became Master must have some benefice besides to enable him to live. Richard Longworth, Master from 1564 to 1569, made a similar com- plaint, putting the weekly expenses of his office at 3. We accordingly find that many of the Masters held country benefices, prebends, or deaneries with their College office. Lord Keeper Williams, who gave ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE to the College the advowsons of Soulderne in Oxfordshire, Freshwater in the Isle of Wight, and the sinecure rectories of St. Florence and Aberdaron in Wales, made it part of the conditions of his gift that the Master should always be entitled to take one of these livings if a vacancy occurred. Many of the Fellows also held benefices or curacies near Cambridge. In the eighteenth century the business of holding ecclesiastical preferment in plurality became almost a fine art ; thus Sir Isaac Pennington, who was President of the College and Regius Pro- fessor of Physic, left to the College by his will a fund to provide the sum of 200 a year for the Master " if he be rector of Freshwater and not otherwise," a direct and curious incentive to holding in plurality. A Fellow was entitled to his commons, and, in addition, to allowances of 135. 4d. under each of the three heads of " corn," "livery," and "stipend," or, as we may say, food, clothes, and pocket-money. The College officers received but small salaries, the most highly paid being the President and Senior Bursar, who each received ^2. An effort was made by the Statutes of the Realm to improve the condition of members of colleges. It seems to have been assumed that the rent of a college farm, like its statutes, could not be altered ; but by an Act of Parliament passed in the eighteenth year of Elizabeth, known as Sir Thomas Smith's Act, it was enacted that from thenceforth 90 SOCIAL LIFE one-third of the rents were to be paid in wheat and malt ; the price of wheat for the purposes of the Act being assumed to be 6s. 8d. a quarter, and of malt 5. a quarter. Thus if before the Act the rent of a farm was 6 a year, after it became law the tenant had to pay ^4 in money, three- quarters of wheat, and four quarters of malt, these two latter items coming to i each. But the tenant now paid a rent varying according to the prices of the day namely, the money rent plus the cash value of the wheat and malt according to the best prices of these commodities in Cambridge on the market-day preceding quarter-day. Thus as the prices of wheat and malt rose the College benefited. By the Act this variable one-third, or "corn-money," went to in- crease the allowance for commons. As time went on the amount of the corn- money was more than sufficient to pay for the commons, and a further modest allow- ance out of the surplus was made to all who participated in the College revenues, whether as Master, Fellow, scholar, or sizar, under the name of pr&ter. In process of time another source of revenue arose. Leases of College estates were usually granted for a term of forty years, and there was a general custom that the tenant might surrender his lease at the end of fourteen years and receive a new one for forty years. As prices rose tenants were willing to pay a consideration for the 9 1 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE renewal known as a " fine " this was calcu- lated on the full letting value of the estate at the time of the renewal, the rent reserved remaining at its traditional amount. At first this fine-money was regarded as a species of surplus, and grants were made from it to Fellows or scholars who were ill or in special need of temporary assistance. The cost of entertaining royalties or other distinguished visitors, and part of the cost of new buildings, were defrayed from this source. In the year 1629 the practice arose of dividing this fine- money up among the Master and Fellows in certain shares, and the money so paid became known as the "dividend." At the present time the College property is managed like any other landed estate, and after the neces- sary expenses of management and mainten- ance have been met, and certain fixed sums paid to the scholars and exhibitioners, and to the University, the remainder is by the statutes divided up into shares called divi- dends, each Fellow getting one dividend, the Master and the members of the College Council receiving certain additions calcu- lated in dividends ; there is a general re- striction that the dividend shall not exceed 250 a year. The fall in the value of land at present automatically provides that this limit is not exceeded ; if the revenues be- come more than sufficient for the purpose, additional fellowships and scholarships must be established. The reader will gather that the chief 92 SOCIAL LIFE endowment of the College arises from land. The College estates lie scattered over most of the eastern side of England, from York- shire to Kent. There is no large block of property anywhere. The estates in past times, when means of communication were poor, must have been difficult to visit. In the leases of the more distant farms it was usual to stipulate that the tenant should provide " horse meat and man's meat " for the Master and Bursar and their servants while on a tour of inspection. That some care was bestowed on the management is clear from the regular entries, in the books of accounts, of the expenses of those " riding on College business." Probably the estates were visited when leases came to be renewed, and an effort made to discover the actual letting value of the property. Land agents seem to have been first employed to make formal valuations towards the end of the eighteenth century, and about the same time plans of the estates were obtained, some of these, made before the enclosures, showing the land scattered in many minute pieces, are very curious and interesting. The actual life within the College walls is not so easy to describe with any certainty. At first, as we have seen, the undergraduates actually lived with Fellows of the College, and overcrowding must have been a constant feature of College life. On i5th December 1565 a return was made to Lord Burghley of all students, " whether tutors or pupils," 93 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE residing in the College, with notes as to whether they had come into Chapel in their surplices or not. The return concludes with this summary : "The whole number is 287, whereof there came into the Chappell with surplesses upon the last Saturdaie and Sondaie 147 ; and abrode in the country 33. And of thother 107 whiche cumme not in as yet, there be many cumme to the Colledge of late and be not yet provided of surplesses." At this time we have to remember that the buildings of the College consisted only of the First Court, the Infirmary or Labyrinth, and a small block of buildings in a corner of the ground now occupied by the Second Court, swept away when that was built. The arrangement seems to have been as follows. The ground-floor rooms were occupied by junior Fellows, each with a few pupils. The rooms on the first floor, known in the College books as the " middle chambers," were in greater request ; with these went the rooms on the second floor, with sometimes- excehes or garrets over them these could accommodate a senior Fellow with several pupils. In the older parts of the College the rooms occupied the whole depth of the building, and so were lighted from both sides; in the corners, when light could be obtained, cubicles or studies were partitioned off. From a sanitary point of view, life under such conditions must have left much to be desired, and the burial registers of All Saints' parish (in which the 94 SOCIAL LIFE older part of the College is situated) leave the impression of frequent and almost epi- demic illness in the College during the sixteenth and early part of the seventeenth century. The undergraduates in early times were much younger than the men of the present day. The statutes prescribed that the oath should not be required from scholars who were under sixteen years of age ; the frequent occurrence of nan juratus in the admission entry of a scholar shows that many came to the College before that age. Probably the average age was about sixteen ; the idea being that after the seven years' residence required for the M.A. degree they would be of the proper age to present themselves for ordination. Those under eighteen years of age might be publicly whipped in the Hall for breaches of discipline. Students from distant parts of England probably resided continuously in College from the time they entered it until they took their degrees. The statutes of King Henry VIII. contemplate a period of some relaxation at Christmas ; providing that each Fellow in turn should be " Lord " at Christmas, and prepare dialogues and plays to be acted by members of the College between Epiphany and Lent. The brazier in the Hall seems to have been kept burning in the evening about Christmas time ; of this practice a curious relic survived until comparatively lately, it being the custom to 95 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE leave a few gas-jets burning in the Hall until midnight from St. John's Day (December 27) until Twelfth Night. There were three classes of students. The Fellow Commoners, sons of noblemen or wealthy land-owners, who sat at the High Table, or, as it was phrased, were in Fellows' commons. Some came in considerable state. In 1624 the Earl of Arundel and Surrey sent his two sons, Lord Maltravers and Mr. William Howard, to the College. The Earl's chaplain, or secretary, in making arrangements for their coming, wrote to request that they should have one chamber in the College, with a " pallett for the gromes of their chamber " ; the rest of " his lordships company, being two gentle- men, a grome of his stable and a footman, may be lodged in the towne near the College." At this period the Second Court had been built, and the accommodation for residence thus somewhat greater than in Elizabethan times. The Fellow Commoner wore a gown ornamented with gold lace, and a cap with a gold tassel. The last Fellow Commoner at St. John's to wear this dress was the present Admiral Sir Wilmot Hawksworth Fawkes. The next class in order of status were the Pensioners men who paid their ex- penses without assistance from the College, sons of middle-class parents. In times of which we have any definite record this was the most numerous class in College. Lastly, 96 SOCIAL LIFE we have the sizars. A sizar was definitely attached to a Fellow or Fellow Commoner ; he was not exactly a servant, but made him- self generally useful. For example, those members of the College who absented them- selves from the University sermon were in the eighteenth century fined sixpence, and the sizars were expected to mark the absentees. The sizar at Cambridge had, however, always a better status than the servitor at Oxford, and in the days when scholarships were strictly limited as to locality, a sizarship was something of the nature of what at the present day we should describe as an entrance scholarship or exhibition, the assistance given consisting in a reduction of expenses rather than in actual direct emolu- ment. At the present time there is no difference in status among members of the College ; the foundation scholars, however, having special seats in Chapel and a separate table in Hall if they choose to make use of it. Until 1882 the condition of celibacy attached to all fellowships in the College ; Queen Elizabeth held strong views on the matter, even discouraging the marriage of Masters. The necessity of taking orders was somewhat relaxed in 1860. The system had its advantages it tended to pro- duce promotion ; for the natural inclination of mankind to marry, vacated fellowships ; the disadvantage was that men with a real taste for study or teaching had no certain 97 G ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE career before them. The question of allowing Fellows to marry was raised in the eighteenth century, but met with little support and much opposition. Even in THE "BRIDGE OF SIGHS" the middle of the nineteenth century a University Commission inclined to the view that celibacy was inseparable from the collegiate system. The clerical restriction had the effect of chiefly confining selection to College offices SOCIAL LIFE to those who were in orders. These in due course went oft to benefices in the gift of the College, these acting as a species of pension. One form of benefaction frequently bestowed by past members was the gift of an advowson ; one or two benefactors left estates, the revenues from which were to accumulate, and with the sums so raised advowsons were to be purchased. Presenta- tion to livings went by seniority of standing, and this practice, with the restriction on marriage, gave rise to the belief, still pre- valent in many parishes where the College is patron, that the College on a vacancy always chooses for the next incumbent " the oldest bachelor." It seems probable, without any minute statistical inquiry, that most of the Fellows left the College before the age of forty. A few remained on for life. It is difficult now to reconstruct a picture of the High Table, made up as it was for many years of a group of middle-aged or elderly men, with a considerable admixture of youthful Fellow Commoners. During the eighteenth century the proportion of Fellow Commoners was probably from one-fourth to one-third of those dining together, and con- straint on both sides must have been almost inevitable. The terms " don " and "don- nishness " seem to have acquired their un- complimentary meaning about this period. The precise significance of " don " is not easy to express concisely ; the most felicitous 99 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE is perhaps that of the Oxford Shotover Papers, where we read that don means, in Spain, a gentleman ; in England, a Fellow. The abolition of the Fellow Commoner was perhaps chiefly due to the rise of the democratic spirit and a general dislike of privilege, but there are other grounds for welcoming it. Of the individuals who make up the stream of youthful life which has ebbed and flowed through the College gate there is but little official record. An Admonition Book exists, in which more than a century ago those who were punished for graver offences against discipline signed the record of their sentence and promised amendment. One youth admits over a trembling signa- ture that he was " admonished by the Master, before the Seniors, for keeping strangers in my chamber till twelve o' the clock, and disturbing the Master by knocking at his gate in an irreverent manner at that hour for the keys of the gate." When the College gate was closed it may be explained that the keys were placed in the Master's keeping. We are, however, left in ignorance of what passed in that chamber until the midnight hour. Yet no doubt the student in past days had his amusements as well as his successor of the present day rougher perhaps, but not less agreeable to him. In Bishop Fisher's statutes archery was encouraged as a pastime, and we know from Ascham's writings that he indulged 100 SOCIAL LIFE in it. In the sixteenth century the College built a tennis-court for the use of its mem- bers. John Hall, who entered the College in 1646, recommended " shuttlecock" as fit for students " it requires a nimble arme with quick and waking eye." We hear of horse matches and cock-fighting, but in terms of disapproval. Football is mentioned in 1574, when the Vice-Chancellor directed that scholars should only play upon their own College ground. In 1595 "the hurt- ful and unscholarly exercise of football " was forbidden, except within each College and between members of the same College. Certain general orders for the discipline of the undergraduates, which gave rise to much controversy about 17 50, forbade cricket between the hours of nine and twelve in the morning. In 1763 the Vice-Chancellor required that no scholar, of whatever rank, should be present at bull-baiting. We read in the eighteenth century of " schemes " or water-parties on the river, but these appear to have been more of the nature of picnics than exercises of skill. Riding was probably very common, the student arriving on his nag, perhaps selling it and using the proceeds as a start in his new life. The phrase " Hobson's choice " took its rise from the rule in the livery stables of Hobson the carrier that a man who hired a hack had to take the one that stood nearest to the stable door. In later days stage-coaches supplied a more regular means of conveyance. 101 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE Students leaving Cambridge for the North betook themselves to Huntingdon, and were housed at the George Inn there till places could be found for them in the coaches. The landlord of the George sending over to Cambridge to let it be known that one batch were gone and that another might come over. Traditions linger in parishes round Cam- bridge that the University " gentlemen " used certain fields or commons for the pur- pose of riding races ; the Cottenham steeple- chases are presumably a survival of this practice. Shooting and coursing, with a little hunting, came into vogue at the end of the eighteenth century. The rise and organisation of athletic sports as an essential element of College life would require a bulky history in itself. The first to take definite form was rowing. The historic boat club of the college is the Lady Margaret Boat Club ; this was founded in the October term of 1825. The actual founder of the club seems to have been the Hon. Richard John Le Poer Trench, a son of the second Earl of Clancarty. Trench afterwards became a captain in the 52nd Regiment, and died 1 2th August 1841. The club was the first to start an eight-oared boat on the Cam, though some Trinity men had a four-oar on the river a short time before the Lady Margaret was started. Among the first members of the club were William Snow and Charles Merivale, after- 102 SOCIAL LIFE wards Dean of Ely. Trench acted as stroke of the original first boat crew in the Lent Term of 1826. There were at first no regular races, but impromptu trials of speed with other crews frequently took place. In 1827 the University Boat Club was started, and regular bumping races begun. The first challenge to Oxford was determined on at a meeting of the University Boat Club held 2Oth February 1829, when it was resolved : "That Mr. Snow, of St. John's, be requested to write immediately to Mr. Staniforth, Christ Church, Oxford, propos- ing to make up a University Match." The match was made up, and the race rowed at Henley on loth June 1829, and from this the annual boat-race between Oxford and Cambridge takes its rise. Snow acted as stroke of the Cambridge boat, George Augustus Selwyn, successively Bishop of New Zealand and Lichfield, rowed " seven," and Charles Merivale " four." Snow (after- wards Strahan) became a banker, and died at Florence 4th July 1886. In after years when, from 1861 to 1869 inclusive, Oxford had uniformly beaten Cambridge, the Lady Margaret supplied the late John H. D. Goldie to break the spell and restore hope and confidence to Cambridge crews. Thus the College club has taken an im- portant part in the establishment and maintenance of Cambridge rowing. Two verses of the College boat song run as follows : 103 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE " Mater regum Margareta Piscatori dixit laeta ' Audi quod propositum ; Est remigium decorum Suavis strepitus remorum Ergo sit Collegium.' Sic Collegium fundatum Et Johannis nomen datum Margareta domina, Ergo remiges gaudendum Triumphandum et canendum In saeclorum secula." So that, if we can trust the historic in- sight of the author (Mr. T. R. Glover), the intentions of the foundress have been duly carried out. The uniform of the club was at first much what it is now, a white jersey with pink stripes ; with this was worn a jacket of scarlet flannel, popularly known as a " blazer " a name which has passed into the English language as descriptive of the coloured jackets of all clubs. It is said that some one, whose feeling for analogy was stronger than for decorum, described the surplice as "the blazer of the Church of England." Organised cricket clubs, athletic clubs, and football clubs grew up, and in process of time clubs for the pursuit of every kind of athletic exercise have been started. Originally each club in College had a subscription, paid by its members, towards the expenses of the special game. About twenty years ago all the clubs in St. John's were united into one club 104 SOCIAL LIFE "The Amalgamation." The subscription to this entitles a member to join in any of the recognised games. The funds are ad- ministered by a committee consisting of the representatives of those interested in the different games, and grants made from the general fund towards the expenses of each game. The presence of a few senior mem- bers of the College on the committee pro- vides the continuity so difficult to maintain with the short-lived generations of under- graduate life. The College provides the ground for the cricket, football, and lawn- tennis clubs, while through the generosity of members of the College of all standings a handsome boat-house has recently been built on the river. The College also possesses flourishing musical and debating societies, and from time to time clubs arise for literary and social purposes, dying out and being refounded with great persistence. In another sphere of work the College has taken a leading part. St. John's was the first College in Cambridge to start a mission in London the Lady Margaret Mission in Walworth. Preaching in the College Chapel on 28th January 1883, the Rev. William Allen Whitworth, a Fellow of the College, then Vicar of St. John's, Hammersmith, afterwards Incumbent of All Saints', Margaret Street, suggested that the College should support a mission in some neglected district of London. The matter took form a little later in the year, and 105 ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE since then the College Mission has been a College institution. Members of the College visiting the mission district, and visitors from Walworth coming for an annual outing, including a cricket match, in August. Another flourishing institution is the Col- lege magazine, The Eagle. Founded in the year 1858, it has maintained its existence for nearly fifty years, being now the oldest of College magazines. It has numbered among its contributors many who have subsequently found a wider field and audi- ence : some of the earliest efforts of Samuel Butler, author of Erewhon, are to be found in its pages. I now bring my sketch of the College history to a close. I have endeavoured, within the prescribed limits, to give an outline of the corporate life of an ancient and famous foundation. In writing it two classes of readers have been borne in mind : the visitor who, within a short compass, may wish to learn something more than can be picked up by an inspection of the buildings ; members of the College who feel a lively interest in the habits and pur- suits of those who have preceded them. I have, perhaps, thought more of the latter than of the former class. Members of the College have always been distinguished for a certain independ- ence of thought and adherence to principle, 1 06 SOCIAL LIFE not always guided by motives of mere worldly prudence ; they have always been noted for that strong corporate feeling which finds expression in the words of Viscount Falkland's letter, before alluded to : "I still carry about with me an indel- ible character of affection and duty to that Society, and an extraordinary longing for some occasion of expressing that affection and that duty." To one who has spent much of his life in the service of the institution to which he owes so much, the words of the Psalmist (a Scot naturally quotes the version en- deared to him by early association) seem to put the matter concisely " For in her rubbish and her stones thy servants pleasure take ; Yea, they the very dust thereof do favour for her sake." I0 7 INDEX ADAMS, J. C., 16, 25, 26, Commons, 43, 90 29, 82 Corn Rents, 91 Admonition Book, 100 Cricket, 101 Armorial Bearings, 2 Cromwell, O. , 56, 63 Arrowsmith, J. , 57 Cromwell, T., 29, 30 Ascham, R. , 19, 23, 44 Ashton, H., 19 DALLAM, R., 22 BAKER, T. , 28, 32, 61 Balsham, Hugo de, 36 Baronsdale, W. , 50 Dawson, J., 70 Denman, T. , 71 Digby, E., 4 8 Dividend, 92 Barwick, J. , 31 Bateson, W. H., 81 Beale, W. , 56 Eagle, The, 106 " Blazer," 104 Eagle Close, 10 Blunt, J. J., 22 Edward VI., 45 Boat Club, 102 Elizabeth, Queen, 46, 47 Bohun, H., 47 Estates, 93 " Bridge of Sighs," 8, 10 Examinations, 24, 69 Briggs, H. , 51 Brown, " Capability," 10 Bull-baiting, 101 Burghley, Lord, 18, 48 FAIRFAX, T. , 31, 56, 62 Falkland, Viscount, 18, 62, 107 CAREY, V., 28 Catton, T., 70 Fawkes, Sir W. H.,g6 Fellow Commoners, 66, 96, Caxton, 31 Celibacy, 97 97. 99 Fisher, John, 37 Floods, 7 Chapel, New, 13-17 Chapel, Old, 4, 13 Charles I. , 26, 30, 52, 56, 86 Charles II., 31 Football, 101 Forster, T. , 63 Frost, H., 35 Cheke, Sir J. , 44 Churchill, C. , 70, 72 CANTON, R., 70 Clarkson, T. , 26 Gilbert, W., 18. 50, 51 Clayton, R., 49 Glover, T. R. , 104 Clive, R. H.,22 Goldie, J. H. D., 103 College Leases, 91 Gower, H., 7, 59, 60 Combination Room, 5, 23, Gunning, P., 57 25. 27 Gwyn, O. , 52, 62 IO9 INDEX HALL, THE, 23 Mayor, J. E. B., 25, 61 Hare, Sir R. , 25 Mengs, R. A. , 22 Hawksmoor, N., 8 Merivale, C., 102, 103 Heberden, W. , 73 Metcalfe, N. , 20, 40, 42 Henrietta Maria, Queen, 26 Mission, Walworth, 105 Henry VII., 38 Mortuary Roll, 30 Henry VIII., 18, 38, 41, Mossom, D. , 63 45,86 Herrick, R., 63 NEWCOME, J., 31 Herschel, Sir J. F. W.,25, Nonjurors, 59 26, 82 Norton, F. , 72 High Altar, 46 Hill, R. , 84 OATES, Titus, 63 Hoare, H., 16 Okeley, F., 84 Hoghton, General, 70 Organ, 22 Hopton, Sir I., 63 Ospringe, 41 Home Tooke, 72 Hospital of St. John, 14, 35 PALMER, E. H., 25 Howard, Lord Thomas, 3 Palmerston, Viscount, 71 Hutchinson, H., 8 Parsons, Hon. C. A., 83 Paul's Cross, 43 INFIRMARY, 17 Peckover, Dr. A., 39 Pennington, Sir I., 90 JAMES I., 26, 49, 52 Percy, A. , 40 James II., 58 Peterhouse, 36, 37 Jenkin, R., 61, 64 Pilkington, J., 89 Powell, SirF. S., 16 KENNEDY, B. H., 25 Powell, W. S., 69 Kikuchi, D., 83 Powis, Earl, 21 Kirke White, H., 4, 20 Prater, 91 Kitchen, 32 Prior, M. , 32, 63 Knox, E. , 17 Knox, John, 17 REFORM, University, 80 Knox, N., 17 Registers, 61, 62 Reyner, G. F., 16 LABYRINTH, 17, 18, 94 Rickman, T. , 8 Lady Margaret, i, 2, 37 Rowing, 102 Laud, 30 Leases, 92 ST. JOHN'S Street, 16 Library, 25, 27, 28 Scott, A. J. , 71, 72 Lillechurch, 30, 41 Scott, SirG. G., 15, 17 Li nacre, T. , 49 Scott, J. O. , 22 Liveing, G. D. , 25 Seaton, G., 55 Longworth, R. , 47, 89 Selwyn, G. A., 26, 103 Ludlam, W., 70 Selwyn, W. , 15 Seven Bishops, 58 MARTYN, H., 71 Shittlecock, 101 Mary, Queen, 46 Shorton, R., 40 Mason, W. , 72 Shrewsbury, Countess of, 5, Master's Lodge, 15, 25 19, 28 110 INDEX Sizar, 97 Tuckney, A., 57 Smith, R., 50 Tutorial System, 77 Smith, W., 73 Tyrrell, W., 26 Snow, W. , 102, 103 Stag Staircase, 4 VICTORIA, Queen, 18 Stage Plays, 23, 95 Staincoat, 5 WASHINGTON, Geo. , 64 Stankard, 5 Whitaker, W. , 48 Statues, 1 8 Whitgift, T. , 48 Statutes, 42, 43, 61, 74, 79, j Whitworth, W. A., 105 81 Whytehead, T. , 22 Strafford, Lord, 18, 56, 62 Wilberforce, W., 26 Wilderness, The, 9, 10 TATHAM, R., 22, 80 Williams, John, 7, 18, 25, Taylor, B., 63 27, 28, 29, 52 Taylor, C., 82 Wood, J., 20, 78 Thomas, Sir N. , 25 Wordsworth, W., 25, 26, Townshend, Marquis, 70 32 Trench, R. J. Le P., 102 Wren, Sir C., 7 Trinity College, 44 1 Wren's Bridge, 8, 9 THE END Primed by BALLANTYNK, HANSON & Co. Edinburgh &* London UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LJBflARY FACILITY A 000 690 503 8