) 885 Shadov/s in the Ethics of tha International Medical Conpress Levi Cooper Lane '/ Shadows in the Ethics INTERNATIONAL' EDICAL CONGRESS, LEVI COOPER LANE, A. M., M. D. (Jefkersox and Berlin), Professor of Surgery in Cooper Medical College, and MEMuiiR of the Royal College OF Sdrgeoxs, England. WITH COMPLIMENTS OF THE AUTHOR San Francisco : A. L. BANCROFT & COMPANY, PRINTERS. 1885. Shadows in the Ethics INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CONGRESS, LEVI COOPER LANE, A. M., M. D. (Jefferson and Berlin), Professor of Sdrgery m Cooper Medical College, and Member of the Royal College OF Surgeons, England. gSte San Francisco : A. L. BANCROFT & COMPANY, PRINTERS. 1885. PREFACE. The author of these pages believes it the duty of every man, when wrongfully attacked, to defend himself; and knowing, too, that the world has enough to do, to be not <£> much concerned with the personal contention of individuals, '^ it has been his aim to render this paper as nearly impersonal ^ as possible, in avoiding the fallacy e^ tu quoque: had he no -^ chosen the personal method, he could have used a number •** . ... * of choice arrows that remains untouched in his quiver. LEVI C. LANE. San Francisco, Cal., July lo, 1885. 30477.5 SHADOWS IN THE ETHICS International Medical Congress, For the information of readers who have not followed the International Medical Congress through its phases of change since it was decided to hold the next meeting in this country, it may be stated that the original committee of seven men, to whom the American Medical Association in 1884 gave the matter in charge, being invested, in accordance with the Act creating the committee, with full powers to perfect such arrangements as would secure a successful meeting, proceeded to outline the work that was to be done, by the creation of nineteen sections, represent- ing in detail every department in the Science of Medicine. This division of the work, copied mainly from the method pursued at the preceding sessions of the Inter- national Medical Congress, was assigned to a like number of committees, composed of medical men selected from different sections of the United States. The American Medical Association, at its recent session in New Orleans, declined to accept the work done by the committee appointed the previous year, and created a new one, with instructions to revise and change the work of the former committee in whatever way it might see fit. No impartial mind will admit that there was need of revision and change of the work done by the first committee; and it is greatly to the credit of nearly one-third of the delegates at New Orleans, that they strenuously opposed it. What a chaplet is this discord to place on the grave of Dr. Thomas, who, in the discharge of his duties as a co-laborer with the old committee, lost his Hfe! What a recompense to Drs. Flint and Billings, through whose personal efforts at the last meeting the Congress was induced to hold its first session in the New World! Their scourging finds an analogue in the fate of Columbus, who was borne in chains over the ocean across which he was the first to lead the Old World. How edifying this spectacle to the eyes of the Pasteurs, Charcots, Virchows, Volkmanns, Esmarchs, Listers, and Pagets, who are expected to honor with their presence the coming Congress ! The new committee lately met in Chicago, and under the Chairmanship of Dr. R. Beverly Cole, Professor of Obstetrics in the Medical Department of the University of California, has accomplished its work of revision, of which, at the time of writing this, I have no knowledge except of the action taken in reference to myself, and hence I know not whether local envy in that convention has invested itself with similar infamy, by cowardly attacking others, whose absence rendered them helpless to defend them- selves. In my case the action taken was in direct violation of that in use before the common tribunals of Justice, where no one can be condemned without a hearing; and especially was it out of place in a convention sitting- within that sacred circle of Ethics, whose laws aim at a higher model of right and equity than can be found in the Justinian Pandects, or in any modern code of law. Besides the denial hereafter given of the charges against me, I will here say that no one has ever been more loyal to Regular Medicine than myself, whether professionally as a consultant, or didactically as a teacher. And this loyalty has sprung from a study of Medicine in its Greek and Latin sources, and in its later growth as contained in four promi- nent weeklies, published respectively in America, England, France, and Germany, a Spanish monthly, and a twenty years' reading of Canstatt's Jahresbericht, " An Annual Review of Medicine in all Lands." This reading will teach any one that there is but one Medicine, and that the Old School is its Oracle. War Department, Surgeon-General's Office, Washington, June 29, 1885. Dear Doctor : You will see the doings of the Chicago Committee in the Journal of the American Medical Association. It 8 made Cole, President of the Committee of Organization, and Shoemaker, Secretary. All New Code men were dropped. You were dropped at Cole's instance, as being New Code. Drs. Hays, Browne, and myself have resigned from the committee. It's a bad piece of business. Regretting the results of our efforts, I remain, Yours very sincerely, John S. Billings. Dr. Levi C. Lane^ San Francisco. I am not now, nor have I ever been, connected with the New Code movement, either here or elsewhere; in fact, the subject has never been a matter of division on this Coast. I am a member of the American Medical Asso- ciation, and as a duly accredited delegate, I represented that body not long since in the British Medical Asso- ciation, and my mission was not dishonored by ostentatious show there or elsewhere, during a sojourn of over two years, during which I met the leading men connected with the medical institutions of Great Britain, Sweden, Russia, France, and Germany. I am a Member of, and very recently President of, the State Medical Society of Cali- fornia, from which Dr. Cole was sent as delegate to New Orleans. But my offense was quite outside of the New Code. Four years ago I reorganized in this city the first medical school ever established on the Pacific Coast, and to in- crease its efficiency and permanency, I gave it a property of value greater than any sum ever before given by any physician in this country for the advancement of medical science. This school, by winnowing out improper material; by an enforced preliminary examination, and by the thoroughness of the instruction given in it by an educated faculty working in harmony, has naturally become the rival of another medical school in this city, Dr. Cole being connected with the last-mentioned school. Would it not be distrusting the reader's acumen to add further words to connect this paragraph with the subject here in question ? London, Sept. 30, 1881. My Dear Doctor Lane: Your very kind letter of the 8th was received but yes- terday. You cannot imagine how much pleasure it gave me to learn directly from you of the permanent improve- ment of my son-in-law, as also your expression of approba- tion of the conduct of my dear child in the case. A better child never lived, and in my experience, good children make good wives, and I believe she is one of the best. It is needless, dear Doctor, to presume to attempt to express my gratitude for your unremitting attention. I feel, from what my child has so often repeated — as well as the patient — that you could not have done more had she been of your kin ; and to venture to say all I would under the circumstances would result in an utter failure, hence I lO will only request that you reverse our positions, and what you would feel I do feel! With kind remembrances to all mutual friends, in which Mrs. C. unites with me, I remain, dear Doctor, Yours, R. Beverly Cole. In addition to this letter, two others were received of tenor so similar that I will limit myself to this quotation from one of them, viz.: That, although he has his pecu- liarities, he is - a man of heart, and, besides gratefully acknowledging the favors done, hopes the day may come when he can give some proof of his gratitude. The services here referred to began in response to a transcontinental telegram to the daughter from the father on his way to the International Congress in London; they embrace a period of nearly three years, of which nine months consisted of nearly daily visits up many tiresome flights of stairs; for in large cities, worthy* penury is forced to take such refuge in its misfortunes. Besides these visits, frequent consultations were given at my office, in which the patient always received preferred attention. In addition to the husband, the wife also was often under treatment, and the attention to the latter reaches to within a few weeks ago. In thus striking my name from the Committee of Arrangements, from the list of Vice-Presidents of the com- * Worthy, for heredity, here presents a notable variation. II ing International Congress, and from the Section of Surgery, he has paid his debt. Stones — and only stones — have been received for the life saved. One seeks in vain for words to describe such action, since such action has been so nearly unheard of as to have rendered it unnecessary to create words for its expression. The honors conferred on me by the original Committee of Arrangements were given unasked for. I had already sketched out some work as a contribution on a topic of surgery, in which I have had much experience; besides, I was in negotiation with a man of wealth for the establish- ment of an international medical prize for researches upon typhoid fever. These facts are here mentioned to show that I had not entered on this labor with an idle hand. But my retirement has the solace of most excellent company; retirement with such men as Drs. Hays, Browne, and Billings can be borne. The first, the worthy heir of an illustrious name in American medicine, is the editor of the veteran mouth-piece of American medicine, viz.: J he Ai7ierican yournal of Medical Sciences. The second has long been an ornament to the Surgical Corps of the United States Navy — a body of men second to none in refined culture and scientific attainments. As to the third, he and Dr. Cole were both at the Congress in London, 1881; and while Dr. Cole, conspicuous in his livery of bombast, was bringing derision on himself* and odium upon American * As he also did upon himself in this State, where the only effort in his department destined to live is to be found in the proceedings of the State Medical Society, in which he dishonored the character of every mother and daughter of California. 304775 12 medicine by his exaggerations and incredible statements ; while he was squandering the golden moments of that learned body, in the parade of his vaginal mechanical jim- cracks, which adverse criticism has already consigned to the lumber-room of oblivion (where a lover of antiquities might have found them years ago) — while this man was strutting and filling the learned ears from all nations with his ''sound and fury." there stood there another man of unpretending demeanor, whose learned escutcheon bore the simple inscription, Modesty ; and whose able papers, be- sides partially atoning for his countryman's parade and superficiality, won for their author an enduring place in the literature of the Congress, as well as in the memories of those present, and caused him to be recognized as the tongue, voice, fame, and honor of American representation in that august assembly ; and this man was — John Shaw Billings. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY This book is DUE on the last date stamped below I, •43(3205) c^'y ly ^■'■s '•!■■