rr% 
 
 ' % <hii*Q 
 
 Division of Agricultural Sciences 
 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 TO BEEF CATTLE 
 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 
 
 REUBEN ALBAUGH 
 HORACE T. STRONG 
 F. D. CARROLL 
 
 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL 
 Experiment Station 
 Extension Service 
 
 CIRCULAR 451 
 
tyou ca*t ttnfifiove youi &e%ct& 
 
 Selective faeectiity 
 
 *7&t& citcutat 
 
 if you consistently select cattle that have weight for 
 their age, grade high, and are regular producers. 
 This circular deals with improvement programs for 
 both purebred and commercial herds. 
 
 of commercial cattle is the most rapid, practical, sure, 
 and economical method of improving quality and meat 
 production. It accomplishes these results: 
 
 Brings about improvement, since the best bulls 
 are mated to the best cows. 
 
 Develops uniformity in the herd. 
 
 Insures production of top replacement heifers. 
 
 Makes possible a more effective culling program. 
 
 Helps to determine the good producing bulls. 
 
 simply outlines a recommended beef cattle improvement 
 program— it is not a complete step-by-step description of the 
 whole program. In order to carry it out you will need certain 
 printed forms and some technical assistance from your local 
 University of California Farm Advisor. 
 
 THE AUTHORS: 
 
 Reuben Albaugh and Horace T. Strong are Extension Animal Husbandmen, and F. D. Carroll is 
 Assistant Professor of Animal Husbandry, University of California, Davis. 
 
 MARCH, 1956 
 The cover picture 
 
 is of California Rover II (grade 1-), used in the University herd until thirteen years old, a proven 
 sire of high-gaining, efficient, useful offspring. 
 
rf faide 
 
 for BEEF CATTLE 
 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 
 
 REUBEN ALBAUGH • HORACE T. STRONG • F. D. CARROLL 
 
 PUREBRED HERDS 
 
 CALIFORNIA'S record -of -performance 
 and grading program for purebred beef 
 cattle was originated by the late Profes- 
 sor H. R. Guilbert, assisted by the late 
 Alex McDonald, long-time herdsman for 
 the University of California, and L. H. 
 Rochford, who was Extension livestock 
 specialist when the program was started. 
 Mr. Rochford is now president and gen- 
 eral manager of theTejon Ranch, Bakers- 
 field — one of the largest beef-cattle oper- 
 ations in the state. 
 
 Professor Guilbert reasoned that if 
 feeder and fat cattle can be graded, pure- 
 bred cattle can be classified in a similar 
 way. Observing that there was about 33 
 per cent difference in the price paid for 
 a common feeder steer and that for a 
 fancy feeder, he developed the present 
 University of California Grading Guide 
 ( page 4 ) — whereby animals can be evalu- 
 ated on conformation, quality, character, 
 and type. 
 
 He used numbers rather than names 
 for the various grades. For example, 
 cattle that fall into the No. 1 grade corre- 
 spond to fancy feeders. Under his sys- 
 tem only those animals that would stand 
 high in the show ring in the larger shows 
 of the country are eligible to be graded 
 in this bracket. They are the so-called 
 herd-sire prospects and of course would 
 include the top end of really good breed- 
 ing cows. Guilbert put a "plus" and 
 "minus" on the numbers in order to 
 
 represent the so-called top, medium, and 
 low in each grade. 
 
 In addition he attached a certain per- 
 centage on each grade so that the data 
 collected from records could be statisti- 
 cally analyzed. For example, a 1- animal 
 according to this system would be 93 per 
 cent perfect in conformation, character, 
 and type. The other grades — 2, 3, and 
 4 — were also divided into plus and minus 
 and were given certain percentage rat- 
 ings. Thus the cattle falling into the 2 
 grade would correspond to a choice 
 feeder and were given an 88 per cent 
 rating. The 3 grade would represent a 
 good feeder, and the 4-bracket animals 
 would be equal to mediums. 
 
 The Score Card on page 5 was devel- 
 oped to supplement the Grading Guide. 
 It lists the main points of conformation 
 a judge would consider in judging or 
 grading an animal. 
 
 A numerical score value is assigned 
 each of these points. Feet and legs receive 
 10 points. Depth and thickness, natural 
 fleshing, etc., are included in the Score 
 Card and assigned a certain number of 
 points. For example, if No. 5 animal (See 
 Score Card, page 5) receive the number 
 of points listed under the various head- 
 ings, his total rating would be 81, or a 
 grade of 3+. 
 
 The Score Card helps demonstrate how 
 to grade animals and is useful for the be- 
 ginner in arriving at the proper grade. 
 
 [3 
 
Grading is not an exact science. No in- 
 strument has yet been developed in which 
 an animal can be placed and the exact 
 grade recorded, but good judges of ani- 
 mals can readily learn to grade cattle. 
 
 Grading attempts to measure all beef 
 cattle with the same yardstick. It differs 
 from ordinary judging in that it classifies 
 an animal not only in relation to the indi- 
 viduals in its group but also in relation 
 to the beef-cattle population as a whole. 
 Thus a bull grading a 2 in Colorado 
 should grade 2 in California. 
 
 To conduct a 
 
 Record of Performance program . . . 
 
 1. Enroll your herd by contacting your 
 University of California Farm Advisor. 
 
 He will tell you what supplies you 
 need, explain the official rules, and ar- 
 range for the first grading of the herd. 
 
 2. Supply yourself with the following: 
 
 a) An accurate breeding and calving 
 record of the herd. 
 
 b) A herd book with a separate record 
 sheet for each cow. (The University fur- 
 nishes these record sheets.) 
 
 c) A suitable binder for the record 
 forms. (You can buy this from most sta- 
 tionery stores. One such binder is the 
 Wilson-Jones style SS slotted-lock sec- 
 tional binder No. 278-31.) 
 
 d) A stock scale for weighing individ- 
 uals. 
 
 GRADING GUIDE FOR BEEF CATTLE RECORDS OF PERFORMANCE 
 
 Grade 
 
 Breeding cattle 
 
 Market cattle 
 
 Desig- 
 nation 
 
 Numerical 
 value 
 
 Feeders 
 
 Slaughter 
 
 1 + 
 1 
 1- 
 
 2 + 
 2 
 2- 
 
 98-100 
 
 95-97 
 
 92-94 
 
 89-91 
 86-88 
 83-85 
 
 The top of the grade represents outstanding ani- 
 mals in strong competition. The middle and 
 lower end of the grade represents excellent 
 breeding animals from standpoint of type, con- 
 formation, quality, and character, capable of 
 making a good showing in strong competition. 
 
 Strictly 
 
 fancy or 
 
 select 
 
 Top 
 piime 
 
 Cows in grade 2 +, 2, 2 - are good enough to re- 
 tain for breeding test in purebred herds. This is 
 a practical top for commercial cattle. The top of 
 the grade (2+) represents the best of range 
 bulls; the lower end, of herd bulls. Cattle in 
 this grade are well down the line or out of the 
 money in strong competition. 
 
 Choice 
 
 Prime 
 to top 
 choice 
 
 00 CO CO 
 
 1 + 
 
 80-82 
 77-79 
 74-76 
 
 Cows should be culled from purebred and some 
 commercial herds. Cows in this grade are usu- 
 ally the low end of commercial cattle. Bulls are 
 rarely capable of making much improvement 
 except on very plain cattle. 
 
 Good 
 
 to 
 
 medium 
 
 Medium 
 
 to 
 common 
 
 Choice 
 
 to 
 good 
 
 4 + 
 
 4 
 
 4- 
 
 71-73 
 68-70 
 67 
 
 Plain, upstanding, thin-fleshed, slow-maturing 
 cattle, lacking in quality and character, and 
 having serious defects of conformation should be 
 culled from commercial herds. 
 
 Commer- 
 cial to 
 utility 
 
 [4 
 
 
e) Standard record forms to assure 
 uniformity. 
 3. Follow these rules: 
 
 a) Use a uniform system of grading, 
 so that the animals of a certain grade 
 will be comparable in all the herds in the 
 state. 
 
 b) Include all herd animals over six 
 months of age in the program. Castrated 
 bull calves should be graded and weighed 
 as steers. 
 
 c) All animals should be weighed and 
 graded as calves between the ages of 6 
 and 8 months; yearlings between 15 and 
 18 months; and two-year-olds (optional) 
 between 24 and 30 months. The final 
 weighing and grading should take place 
 at 4 years. 
 
 d) The recommended season for grad- 
 ing and weighing is when the majority of 
 the calves are weaned (6 to 8 months). 
 Off-season calves should be weighed by 
 
 BEEF CATTLE GRADING — SCORE CARD (Score for Animal Number) 
 
 Points of conformation 
 
 Value 
 
 l 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 7 
 
 8 
 
 9 
 
 10 
 
 General type, appearance, 
 and scale — weight for age* 
 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Thickness of body 
 Depth of body 
 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Smoothness of body 
 
 1-5 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Natural fleshing 
 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Head 
 
 1-5 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Neck and shoulders 
 
 1-5 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Crops and ribs 
 
 1-5 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Loin and back 
 
 
 
 
 
 9 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Rump 
 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 
 
 9 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Round 
 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Legs and feet 
 
 1-10 
 
 
 
 
 
 10 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total 
 
 
 
 
 
 81 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The following table is recommended for scoring weight-for-age on the score card. 
 
 Age Heifers and cows Bulls 
 
 180 days 390 lb. 440 lb. 
 
 210 days 440 lb. 510 lb. 
 
 240 days 480 lb. 560 lb. 
 
 15 months 730 lb. 1.000 lb. 
 
 25 months 1,000 lb. 1,400 lb. 
 
 30 months 1,030 lb. 1,450 lb. 
 
 6 years 1,220 lb. 2,000 lb. 
 
 [5] 
 
the breeder when weaned. They will later 
 be officially graded. 
 
 e) The weight of calves raised on nurse 
 cows is superficial and should not be used 
 in figuring averages for the herd; but 
 you can use their grade in calculating the 
 average grade of the herd. Calves prop- 
 erly supplemented by creep-feeding while 
 nursing their mothers can be included in 
 all the records of this program. It is not 
 permissible to use for these records the 
 weights and grades of calves being fitted 
 for show that have been heavily supple- 
 mented while nursing their mothers. Do 
 not creep-feed calves unless the herd is 
 being maintained under adverse feeding 
 conditions. 
 
 f) Use the middle percentage of the 
 grade in calculating the 240-day adjusted 
 weight for calves. As an example, with a 
 2+ = 91-90-89, use 90. 
 
 g) Birth weights of all calves are ad- 
 visable. 
 
 h) Use the "Remarks" column for 
 notes. They will be very valuable at later 
 gradings. After regrading an animal, it 
 is helpful to refer to previous grades and 
 remarks. 
 
 i) An annual summary of all herds co- 
 operating on this program should be 
 made each year, similar to the annual 
 summary of the cow-testing association 
 work. It should be made by the farm ad- 
 visor and a copy mailed to the livestock 
 specialist by January 1. The information 
 is important for evaluating the progress 
 of this program. 
 
 Grading and weighing 
 
 A good time to start the record-of- 
 performance and grading program in a 
 herd is when the majority of the calves 
 are about seven months of age — usually 
 at weaning time. Have each animal in the 
 herd over six months weighed and graded 
 and record the information (See Field 
 Sheet). There is no need to weigh and 
 grade mature animals (over four years) 
 
 except at the beginning of a program. All 
 grading will be done by some official 
 representatives of the University — farm 
 advisors, livestock specialists, or animal 
 husbandry staff members. 
 
 The farm advisor in the county where 
 the herd is located should help the 
 breeder fill out properly the herd book 
 for each breeding cow, following the first 
 weighing and grading. The book can then 
 be turned over to the owner, and it will 
 be largely his responsibility to record the 
 succeeding weighings and gradings. It is 
 highly important that this herd book be 
 kept up-to-date. 
 
 Individual Life Record of Dam 
 
 This record (see page 11) provides com- 
 plete information on each cow and her 
 production. You will see on the first part 
 of this record sheet places to record the 
 owner's name, the breeder's name, the 
 average grade and weight of the cow, and 
 her name, registration number, tattoo 
 number, and birth weight. Space is also 
 provided for her complete pedigree and 
 the data on her individual weight and 
 grade. 
 
 The second part of this sheet is the 
 Produce Record. Here we keep informa- 
 tion on the calves she produces. Items 1 
 to 12 include data of the calf from birth 
 to weaning time. Columns 13 to 16 are 
 for data on any of her calves that have 
 been feed-lot tested for rate and economy 
 of gain. Yearling data are recorded in 
 columns 17 through 19. The Remarks 
 column is important and should be filled 
 with pertinent information. 
 
 The back of the record sheet is a con- 
 tinuation of the Produce Record. The 
 second half is the space provided for 
 recording breeding and calving dates. 
 
 Column 10 of the Produce Record — 
 "Adjusted weight" — is for the purpose 
 of comparing calf weights on an equal 
 basis of 240 days of age, approximately 
 eight months. The table on page 14 is 
 
 On pages 10 to 19 are shown the forms you will use in keeping your 
 herd records. 
 
 re 
 
for your convenience in calculating the ing (average age 7 months) until they 
 
 age of a calf in days. have reached a low-choice live-slaughter 
 
 For example, if a calf was born on grade. This can be done by sire groups or 
 
 January 4 and weaned on August 8 he individually. 
 
 would be 216 days old at time of wean- Heritability for rate and economy of 
 ing. (Subtract 4 days for January from gain in beef cattle is high (see below), 
 the figure 220 under the column August, Bulls that gain rapidly and use their feed 
 opposite the date 8.) But suppose a calf efficiently tend to sire calves that are high 
 was born on November 1 and Weaned on in these two departments of production. 
 July 4 the following year, and you want It is important that the test be con- 
 its age at time of weaning. Run your ducted carefully and accurately, since 
 finger down the July column to the fourth considerable cost and labor are involved, 
 day, and you find the figure 185. Add Remember too that grading and feedlot- 
 this to 365 (days in a full year), getting testing cattle does not necessarily make 
 a total of 550. Subtract 305 (found under them desirable breeding animals. Record 
 the November column, first day), and keeping, selection, and culling are also 
 you get 245. necessary. 
 
 Equip yourself suitably. Good stock 
 
 The Get of Sire Record scales, corrals, and feeding equipment 
 
 This record (see page 13) is provided to are essential. Scales should be checked 
 
 record data on all calves sired by each by the County Sealer of Weights and 
 
 individual bull. One sheet should be used Measures before weights are taken at the 
 
 to record all bull calves and another sheet beginning and end of the test. Such scales 
 
 for all heifer calves by the same sire, may need to be tested at intervals during 
 
 Information on this record sheet is the the feeding experiment. Corrals should 
 
 most important of all. When the data are be big enough so that the bulls can get 
 
 accurately and completely recorded they proper exercise— 200 square feet per 
 
 can be readily used as a guide for culling bull. Feeding troughs and racks should 
 
 and for posting data on the dam-record allow ample feeding space and should be 
 sheet. 
 
 On page 15 is an example of how to ,_, . x ....^ ,_ .. , T . x . 
 
 ii t ^ .1 n , Heritability Estimates of Traits in 
 
 record data on the Get oi bire Kecord. 
 
 The back of the Get of Sire sheet pro- 
 vides a place for the sire's pedigree and Trait Heritability 
 other individual data, such as age, (Percent) 
 
 weight, and condition at the various Bjrth weight 34 
 
 times he has been graded and weighed. Weaning weight 30 
 
 Fill out completely the Average Produce Final feed lot weight 94 
 
 Record on the back of this sheet. You Gain in feed lot 97 
 
 can get the data for this from the infor- Efficiency of gain 48 
 
 mation on the front. Each item required Birth weight 53 
 
 is simple and self-explanatory. Weaning weight 28 
 
 Weight at 15 months 86 
 
 Feedlot-testing bulls . . . Rate of aain on feed 65 
 
 ... . Weaning score 28 
 
 This is an important part of the beef- S | aughter steer grade 45 
 
 cattle improvement program. Feedlot- Carcass grade 33 
 
 testing bulls for rate and efficiency of Area of eye muscle 68 
 
 gain is a good supplement to the weigh- 
 
 ing and grading project. Bulls or heifers L ^Si™>!t£!£^^ nLSSStftS, 
 
 being tested should be full-fed after wean- Quesenberry, 1951). 
 
 [71 
 
constructed to minimize error from 
 waste of feed. Some shelter may be neces- 
 sary during stormy weather. 
 
 The ration should be simple, prac- 
 tical, and in keeping with feeds available. 
 Ground barley, dried molasses beet pulp, 
 cottonseed cake or meal, salt, and bone 
 meal will be suitable in most areas. Hay 
 should be part cereal and part legume. 
 Be careful to feed high-quality hay that 
 has a good green color to prevent Vita- 
 min-A deficiency. Hay can be fed free 
 choice and either chopped or long. 
 
 Here is a suggested ration: 
 
 60 lb. ground barley 
 
 30 lb. molasses beet pulp 
 
 10 lb. cottonseed cake 41-43 per cent 
 1 lb. salt 
 1 lb. bone meal 
 
 Record the weight of feed fed each 
 group daily, and summarize actual con- 
 sumption at 28- or 30-day intervals. This 
 includes hay as well as concentrates. 
 Feed concentrates at the rate of l 1 /^ 
 pounds of concentrate to every 100 
 pounds of live weight when animals are 
 on full feed. For example, a 600-lb. bull 
 would receive 9 pounds of concentrates 
 per head daily. The concentrate feed 
 should be adjusted at the beginning of 
 each 30-day test period. 
 
 Another procedure is to maintain the 
 same proportion of concentrate and 
 roughage constant for all lots. This may 
 be more desirable for standardizing the 
 feed and interpreting the data. A good 
 ratio would be 60 per cent concentrate, 
 40 per cent roughage. This avoids forc- 
 ing a group with a high feed capacity to 
 eat a larger proportion of roughage of 
 lower nutritive value, which affects ap- 
 parent over-all efficiency in terms of total 
 feed. For the present, limit feed-lot test- 
 ing to the dry lot. Feed consumed while 
 grazing on pasture cannot be accurately 
 measured. 
 
 Bulls to be tested should be of about 
 the same age. Use only animals grading 
 2- and better. Weigh and grade them at 
 the beginning of the test, which will in 
 
 most cases be after they are on full feed, 
 or about 2 weeks after weaning. Weigh 
 and grade carefully and uniformly. 
 
 If they have not been creep-fed, take 
 about two weeks to bring them to full 
 feed. Feed them twice daily, separately, 
 by sire groups or individually. For sig- 
 nificant results in sire groups, eight ani- 
 mals are about the minimum number to 
 feed. In some cases smaller numbers may 
 be fed. 
 
 When the bulls are on full feed at the 
 beginning of the test, stand them over- 
 night in a dry lot without feed or water. 
 Weigh the next morning early (about 6 
 a.m.) before feeding. This will be the 
 initial weight. At the end of the feeding 
 tests and for each 30-day period, follow 
 the same weighing procedure as at the be- 
 ginning. 
 
 Record both the United States 
 Slaughter Grade and the University 
 of California Grade. Weigh and grade 
 at the end of each 30 days of feeding. The 
 grading at the beginning and end should 
 be done very carefully; some help from 
 a specialist may be desirable. Try to feed 
 all the animals to the same degree of 
 market finish, which should be the low- 
 choice grade. Usually about a 150-day 
 feeding period will be required to reach 
 such a grade. Some animals finish sooner 
 than others. If considerable variation 
 occurs within a sire group, individuals 
 may be removed from the test when they 
 have attained the desired degree of finish 
 and the remainder continued. This top- 
 ping-out gives a truer evaluation of aver- 
 age efficiency because continued feeding 
 of already fat animals will pull down the 
 average. 
 
 At the close of the feeding test sum- 
 marize the data and prepare a narrative 
 report. Reports should be as uniform as 
 possible. One similar to the report on the 
 feeding test conducted in Monterey 
 County by Albaugh, Guilbert, and Muii 
 is a suggested sample. This report is 
 available in each farm advisor's office. 
 Other tables may be added. This will de- 
 
 [8] 
 
pend on the needs of the individual, 
 ranch, or county. 
 
 After the data have been summarized, 
 a meeting should be held to acquaint 
 local cattlemen with the beef-improve- 
 ment program and to present the results 
 of the experiment. Conformation and 
 type grade should be emphasized as well 
 as rate of gain and feed utilization. 
 
 Limited feeding in the 
 bull-indexing program . . . 
 
 The heritability of the gains made by 
 bulls on a limited-feeding program is 
 not known. Considerably more research 
 needs to be done before we will know if 
 bulls can be adequately indexed on this 
 basis. To breeders who have expressed 
 interest in the possibilities of limited 
 feeding of prospective herd sires, we sug- 
 gest the following method. (In this con- 
 nection it is advisable to work closely 
 with the Extension Service and the Uni- 
 versity, so that you may get as much in- 
 formation as possible.) 
 
 The ultimate objective is to deter- 
 mine the correlation between the gains 
 made by a prospective herd sire on lim- 
 ited feeding of concentrate and the gains 
 of his progeny on full feed. If such a 
 correlation were high enough one might 
 use the limited-feeding program in index- 
 ing bulls as an aid to selecting herd sires. 
 
 The immediate objective is to de- 
 termine the variation in rates of gain 
 and feed efficiency of limited-fed bulls. 
 If little variation between bulls is ob- 
 tained, it would be hard to select accu- 
 rately the most rapidly gaining and most 
 efficient bull. In this case it would prob- 
 ably be unnecessary to carry the studies 
 further. 
 
 If, however, it is possible to obtain 
 rather large differences in rates of gain 
 and feed efficiency between limited-fed 
 bulls, it would be well to pursue the prob- 
 lem further, to determine the capacity of 
 
 these bulls for transmitting their ability 
 to gain. 
 
 Take these four steps: 
 
 1. Select as many young bulls as possible 
 from the progeny of one sire. 
 
 2. Feed individually if possible, using the 
 rate given in the next paragraph. 
 
 3. Carry all bulls to the same degree of 
 finish, probably low-good. 
 
 4. Determine the variation in rates of 
 gain and efficiency of feed-utilization be- 
 tween bulls. 
 
 The rate of limited feeding should 
 be — concentrate, 1.0 pound per 100 
 pounds of body weight; hay, free choice. 
 
 The concentrate allowance of the lim- 
 ited-fed bulls is enough to meet their 
 maintenance requirement for TDN. Un- 
 der such a feeding program, therefore, 
 the ability of the bulls to utilize a high 
 roughage-low concentrate ration is being 
 determined. This is an important consid- 
 eration in feeding ruminants. 
 
 Do your results 
 
 justify continued study? 
 
 If you feel that the difference in rates 
 of gain between bulls is enough to war- 
 rant further investigation, we recom- 
 mend the following steps: 
 
 1. Breed as many of the tested bulls as 
 possible to comparable cows so that at 
 least 10 steer progeny from each bull will 
 be available for progeny-testing. 
 
 2. Group-feed the progeny of each sire on 
 a full-feeding program to choice slaugh- 
 ter condition. 
 
 3. Keep as accurate records as possible 
 on rates of gain and efficiency of feed 
 utilization. 
 
 4. Make records available to the Univer- 
 sity for determination of the heritability 
 estimates. Such estimates will enable you 
 to determine if the gaining ability of the 
 sire on limited feed is a good indication 
 of the gaining ability of his progeny on 
 full feed. 
 
 On pages 10 to 19 are shown the forms you will use in keeping your 
 herd records. 
 
 [9] 
 
1- 
 
 
 j 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ul 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 in 
 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 U) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ul 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 VI 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u. 
 
 
 M 
 u 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 P4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 z 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (V 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 T3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 z 
 
 ce 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ul 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 £ 
 
 bo 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u. 
 
 o 
 
 Ul 
 
 1- 
 
 S 
 £ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 bo 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 <! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 eS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Q 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 <D 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 T3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 eS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 so 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 fl *" 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •-J3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 C be 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 »2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
 -CC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 g bo 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 si 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 ■B • 
 5ta 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 pq-d 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 wo 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Q 
 
 
 * 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 tc 
 
 
 o a 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u 
 
 UJ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 U 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ul 
 
 
 03 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 <J 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Z 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 tt 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 Ul 
 
 V 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 O 
 
 Q 
 
 03 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u. 
 
 Ul 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 Ul 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ul 
 
 tc 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Q. 
 
 CQ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 r 4 
 
 I 10 1 
 
O X 
 
 >- o 
 
 -3 
 
 o a 
 
 3 - 
 
 ! I 
 
 II 
 
 Oi O: o; 
 
 \t t 
 
 %i \ 
 
 OO 
 
 2 3 
 
 I I 
 
 1 II 
 
 JO :0 
 
 if 
 
 I ! 
 
 i if i 
 
 ,°J 
 
 2~- 
 «3°<2 
 
 ^•J 
 
 o I <=! 
 
 g s 
 
 si r 
 
 i i 
 
 On this page is reproduced the front side of a typical 
 Individual Life Record of Dam. 
 
 At left is a fascimile of a Field Sheet form. Its use is 
 described on page 6. 
 
 [ii] 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ■o 
 Q 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 „ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 i 
 
 «J. 
 
 - 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 9 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 « 
 
 R 
 
 « 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 <u 
 
 a 
 
 
 2 
 
 i 
 
 ^ o| 
 
 >n 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 • 
 
 
 K K 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 £ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ N 5* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 S 
 
 tn 
 
 J ^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 t 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 *5 
 
 it 
 
 CM 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 <5 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u 
 
 si 
 
 " 
 
 3 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a a 
 
 
 cc 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •O 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **■ 
 
 JO 
 
 « 
 
 "! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ' |£ 
 
 CNJ Cn| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Q 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 w 
 
 
 
 j j 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 „ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 g 
 
 c 
 u 
 
 s 
 
 Q 
 
 •I 
 
 « 
 
 A 
 
 
 « 
 
 
 
 
 9 
 8 
 
 5 
 
 i 
 
 Q 
 
 H 
 
 3 
 
 I 
 
 1 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 iJ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 * 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ? 
 
 5 
 
 % 
 
 s 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u 
 
 « 
 
 „ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 £ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -J 
 
 c 
 
 
 S 
 
 §1 si 
 
 <=>! 
 
 
 
 03 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 * 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 oi in : 
 
 m 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a. 
 
 
 s 
 
 £ ^ 
 
 > 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 a 
 
 q §1 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 ..ON 
 
 L° 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ « ••« 
 
 : : t« 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 2, 
 
 
 
 
 o •; o c;u o 
 
 8|5| 
 
 mu o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o;a.-Q:o.pa; : :3d; 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i - 
 
 a- s* ^ i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 w u 
 
 Si §' S > s : 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 £ 
 
 <">! «»: O; °i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 X>: ■©: 1-.; z; 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 
 
 ! ^! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _ 
 
 _i 0.1 *>i 
 
 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 lb 
 
 o 
 
 
 3 
 
 I 1 I 
 
 
 
 j 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 § 
 
 
 "3 
 
 £j £L| q| j £; 
 
 
 
 3 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 
 
 
 J 
 
 J o; o; e; S| 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 VJ 
 
 
 
 K( OS K 6 S| 
 
 
 £ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 £ 
 
 
 
 O: ui <_>; c u! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 =>;' 3: 3J 3 
 
 3! 
 
 
 a 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 e 
 
 
 u 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 t| 
 
 Ot "»j Wl p- 
 
 jn 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -j 
 
 
 co £ 
 
 •O; r-| I-, >© 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 § 
 
 5-? 
 
 o! J J B 
 
 
 
 
 
 > 
 
 
 <S°iS 
 
 $1 S q $ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 g 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 
 
 
 S" 8 ! 
 
 on! «a i co i 
 
 Z 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 < 
 
 
 
 °v, 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 
 ° °~ 
 
 ^t in! k! « 
 
 „ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 u 
 
 
 
 
 * 
 
 gu 
 
 
 CH 
 
 " 
 
 s 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 This is the back side of the Individual Life Record of 
 Dam form shown on page 1 1. 
 
 [12] 
 
i 
 
 mi 
 
 CNI 
 
 co; 
 
 i 
 I 
 
 : 
 
 si 
 
 4 
 
 1 
 
 s 
 
 j 1 
 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 j 
 
 
 I I \ 
 i ■ i 
 
 1 1 1 
 
 i i 1 
 
 1 
 I 
 
 i 
 1 
 
 ! £ 
 
 -0 
 
 
 
 e 
 
 i 
 3 
 
 I 
 ! 
 
 ! 
 1 
 
 
 
 I 
 j 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 
 a 
 
 a 
 
 <s 
 
 mi eoi eo 
 
 CD as CD 
 
 ' ! ! ! — ! ! — ! ! — ' 
 
 mi eoi m: eo: i i>»: "": 
 
 eo; eo; eo: eo: 00 
 
 ■oi eo 
 
 — ! — ' — j — 1 ; — ; — ' — ! — ' — ; — : 
 
 1 eoj oi I i I 
 
 i 
 
 5 
 
 < 
 
 
 u 
 
 cn< CNJ CNJ cn 
 
 N | «n| m | 1 | A 
 
 •*< 
 
 &\ 
 
 
 Ull 
 
 Si 
 
 II 
 
 §i Rj g § 
 
 CN; CNj «-| CN 
 
 0; mi oi I 0; - 
 
 8; Sj Si i 8j !S 
 
 ' I i 1 1 1 ; i 
 
 1 0; 0; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j 
 
 ; — ; CN : III II 1 II II I 
 
 oj § 
 Si £ 
 
 I! § 
 
 $u 
 
 oi eo! o; r^ 
 
 m| M oj j mj co; ! ol mj 
 
 i 1 
 
 I = 
 
 -2 a 
 
 "o 
 
 1 
 
 
 O: 
 
 X; eoi SI In 
 
 s>: -j R! 1 1 : -: co : I 
 eo: m: 1: 0: co : : : : 
 
 -o- m; 03: r>.: •0: 
 
 a 
 
 "Sw 
 
 a> co eoi ! oo eo j co| <oj | 
 
 • •* : co; 
 
 
 
 1 (3 1 
 
 a 
 
 cdj «s| «n: j cm! cn; Ii; 
 
 
 
 DRMANCE 
 CORD 
 
 IFORNIA 
 ulture 
 on Service 
 
 £ 
 
 ol m! ml 1 o! ml ! £: 21 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 <3; ^ 
 
 MMI 
 
 
 1 r— ' ■ 
 
 
 
 RECORD OF PERF 
 GET OF SIRE RI 
 
 UNIVERSITY OF CAL 
 
 College of Agr ic 
 
 Agricultural Extensi 
 
 a 
 
 u 
 
 i | 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 £igj 
 
 
 •SI'S 
 
 
 | ; I M M ] M j M || \ I \ j i i 
 
 a u. 
 
 
 
 
 * 
 
 1* 
 
 m: m: — : eoi — i eoi eoi -oi eoi 
 co; eo; 0; eo- 0; eo: eo: *-: eo: 
 
 ; >oi • 
 
 
 •i 
 
 4 
 
 
 <J 
 
 CN: CNj CN: CN: CN: CN: CN: CN: 
 
 j 1 1 i 1 
 
 
 ■Set 
 
 co; 0; 0; cn; eoi eo; ovi ; j j co| j 
 
 
 
 ■vsft 
 
 0! ^i *q\ si fi; Mi w>: i Oi i 
 
 1 1 1 
 
 
 MM 
 
 
 s-3 8 S*l 
 
 mi <oi r~i si co: oi oi ml 1 
 r«.: m: e>: -o; eo; eo; >o; : r-.: : 
 
 
 | 
 
 s 
 
 MiM 
 
 I 
 
 * a 
 
 mi m; m; 0; m; m| m; Si «! 1 
 
 f~; -O: CN: CM: -} : — : CO; IA: O: 
 
 •«r: NT: m: m; m; m: •»; Ij m: 
 
 
 
 1 1 1 1 1 
 
 
 F"I 
 
 cNi eoi .-: o| cn: r^i 0: Si eoi 
 co m co r~ m co «o E* •*•; 
 CN: CN: CN: CN: CN: CN: CN: *: CNj 
 
 
 
 *e 
 
 j] I 
 
 oi oi 
 
 o| 0; oi 0; 
 Oi Oi Oi Oi 
 
 J Vi 1 ; ; ; M ! 
 
 I ; j j 1 : 1 : H 1 
 
 for Yea 
 Addre 
 
 
 j j 
 
 
 1 1 1 1 !! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I 1 1 1 
 
 ilf Crop 
 x of Get 
 
 svner anr 
 
 <3°s £ 
 
 Si ft| CN 
 
 \ 
 
 «| 2| Si l| j mi j | | | j j j | j j | | | 
 
 c 
 
 X 
 
 C 
 
 
 jU 3 
 
 ! s 
 
 eo: 0: cn 
 
 a; s] k 
 
 s 
 
 Oi • ■ ■ • • • 
 
 O: ::::::: : ::::::::::: 
 
 cn. m 1^ :::::::::::::::: 
 
 iiajajj||!!!|ij||j!ii!l| 
 
 Here is a typical Get of Sire Record form. Its use is 
 described on page 7 
 
 [13] 
 

 ■5 8 
 
 I I 
 
 ft, 
 
 o 
 
 t 
 ft. 
 
 
 1 
 
 ^ <w a 
 
 CO CM CO 
 
 CM •» CM 
 
 1 
 
 E 
 Z 
 
 
 cm en cm 
 
 
 1 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 E 
 Z 
 
 
 ■* CO 
 
 \ 1 
 
 S 
 6 
 
 + « J_ 
 
 i * A 
 
 + « 1 
 
 t t t 
 
 OOP 
 
 j= tf < a >» 
 
 «3 c« 
 
 < O £ < 
 
 
 S | || 
 
 < 6 £ £ 
 
 § £ £ £ 
 
 O 
 
 o - 
 
 o 
 
 c c> 
 I ft o 
 
 6 3 
 
 Here is the back side of the Get of Sire Record— the 
 following pages explain the entries. 
 
 [14] 
 
GET OF SIRE RECORD 
 Column Example 
 
 1. Tattoo number of calf 163 
 
 2. Date of birth 1/10/48 
 
 3. Birth weight 65 lb. 
 
 4. Date weaned 7/5/48 
 
 5. Weaning age in days (actual number of days from date of birth to 
 
 weaning date) . Use numerical day calendar 177 
 
 6. Weight in pounds (actual weight on day of weaning) 435 
 
 7. Daily gain from 70-pound birthweight (or actual birth weight) 2.06 
 
 Weaning weight (col. 5, minus 70) , .. 
 
 -g B — -— = average daily gain 
 
 Weaning age (col. 4) 
 
 Example: 435 2.06 
 
 -70 177)365.00 
 
 354 
 
 365 
 
 1100 
 1062 
 
 38 
 
 8. Adjusted 240-day weaning weight 564 
 
 Average daily gain (col. 6) x 240 + 70 = adjusted 240-day weight 
 
 Example: 2.06 494 
 
 x 240 +70 
 
 8240 564 
 
 412 
 
 494.40 
 
 9. Rating on weights and gain -20 
 
 This is determined from the average adjusted 240-day weaning weight 
 of either all of the bull calves, or all of the heifer calves in the 
 herd. This average adjusted 240-day weaning weight of all bull or 
 heifer calves is secured by : 
 
 (a) the total of the adjusted 240-day weaning weight (col. 7) for all 
 bull calves in the herd, divided by the number of bull calves 
 weighed. 
 
 or 
 
 (b) the total of the adjusted 240-day weaning weight (col. 7) for all 
 heifer calves in the herd, divided by the number of heifer calves 
 weighed. 
 
 [15 1 
 
Each individual calfweight (col. 7) is then rated a + (plus) or minus 
 (-) with the number of pounds above or below the average adjusted 
 240-day weaning weight for all bull or heifer calves. 
 
 The terms "excellent" and "good" may be used for those with a plus, 
 and "fair" or "poor" for those with a minus. 
 
 Example : 
 
 Adjusted weaning weight for 
 
 entire bull calf herd 584 lb. 
 
 -564 lb. adjusted weaning weight — 
 
 this bull calf 
 
 Rating on wts. - 20 
 
 10. Grade (the grade given calf at weaning) . 
 
 11. Grade percentage (this is the percentage value of the assigned grade) . 
 
 (Taken from grading-guide table.) 
 Example : 
 
 2+ = 91 
 2 =88 
 3+ = 82 
 
 12. Days on feed 120 
 
 13. Average daily gain 2.2 
 
 Total net gain . , ., 
 
 — — — = Average daily gain 
 
 Days on feed 
 
 2.2 
 
 Example: 120)264.0 
 
 240 
 
 240 
 240 
 
 14. Feed per 100 lb. gain 640 
 
 Total feed consumed x 100 . , _ __ „ 
 
 — — = leed per 100 lb. gain 
 
 lotal net gain 
 
 Example : 640 
 
 264)169,000 
 1,584 
 
 1,690 1,060 
 
 x 100 1,056 
 
 169,000 40 
 
 15. Grade 2+ 
 
 [16] 
 
Totals and Averages 
 
 Column 
 
 2. Average calving date 
 
 From column 5, average days figures back from weaning date. 
 
 5. Total of column . . 
 
 — : — ; : = average weaning age in days. 
 
 No. oi entries in column 
 
 6. Total of column 
 No. of entries in column 
 
 7. Total of column 
 No. of entries in column 
 
 8. Total of column 
 No. of entries in column 
 
 = average weight in pounds. 
 
 = average daily gain. 
 
 = average adjusted 240-day weaning weight. 
 
 9. Average weight column 8 compared with average of all bull (heifer) calves in 
 herd. 
 
 13, 14, 18, 19. — See instructions for 9 and 10 above. 
 
 ANNUAL SUMMARY 
 
 Beef Cattle Record-of-Performance 
 and Grading Program — 19 
 
 1. Name of breeder 
 
 2. Address of breeder 
 
 3. Breed of cattle 
 
 4. Number of years records have been kept on herd 
 
 5. Number of cattle in the herd by age and grade: 
 
 Cows Bulls Heifers Bulls 
 
 (2 yr. and over) (2 yr. and over) (2 yr. and under) (2 yr. and under) 
 
 1 1 1 1 
 
 1- 1- 1- 1- 
 
 2+ 2+ 2+ 2+ 
 
 2 2 2 2 
 
 2- 2- 2- 2- 
 
 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 
 
 3 3 3 3 
 
 [17] 
 
6. Animals removed from herd: 
 
 Sold for slaughter 
 
 Held Sold for Acct. Acct. Acct. Acct. Acct. 
 
 for range breeding age quality ancestry health shy breeder 
 
 Cows, 3 years and over 
 
 2+ 
 
 2 
 
 2 
 
 3+ 
 
 Heifers, 2 years and under 
 
 2+ 
 
 2 
 
 2- 
 
 3+ 
 
 Bulls, 3 years and over 
 
 2+ 
 2 
 
 2 
 
 3+ 
 
 Bulls, 2 years and under 
 
 2+ 
 
 2 
 
 2- 
 3+ 
 
 Castrated Number 
 
 2+ 
 
 2 ~ 
 
 2- 
 
 3+ 
 
 7. The average 240-day adjusted weight and average grade of all calves produced in 
 19 
 
 Heifers Bulls 
 
 Weight Weight 
 
 Grade Grade 
 
 8. Has the Get of Sire sheet been analyzed and supplied to the breeder by the farm 
 advisor each year? 
 
 Yes No... 
 
 [18] 
 
> 9. Has the cooperator maintained a good complete herd book? 
 
 Yes No 
 
 I 
 
 10. Are birth weights of calves being obtained? 
 
 Yes No 
 
 f 11. Is any feeding program being carried out in this herd to determine rate and 
 
 efficiency of gain? 
 
 Yes No 
 
 ^ 12. Will additional herds be added to the program in your county this year? If so, 
 
 how many? 
 
 Yes Number No 
 
 [19] 
 
Day of any 
 
 month 
 
 Jan. 
 
 Feb. 
 
 March 
 
 April 
 
 May 
 
 Jane 
 
 July 
 
 Aug. 
 
 Sept. 
 
 Oct. 
 
 Not. 
 
 Dec. 
 
 1 
 
 1 
 
 32 
 
 60 
 
 91 
 
 121 
 
 152 
 
 182 
 
 213 
 
 244 
 
 274 
 
 305 
 
 335 
 
 2 
 
 2 
 
 33 
 
 61 
 
 92 
 
 122 
 
 153 
 
 183 
 
 214 
 
 245 
 
 275 
 
 306 
 
 336 
 
 3 
 
 3 
 
 34 
 
 62 
 
 93 
 
 123 
 
 154 
 
 184 
 
 215 
 
 246 
 
 276 
 
 307 
 
 337 
 
 4 
 
 4 
 
 35 
 
 63 
 
 94 
 
 124 
 
 155 
 
 185 
 
 216 
 
 247 
 
 277 
 
 308 
 
 338 
 
 5 
 
 5 
 
 36 
 
 64 
 
 95 
 
 125 
 
 156 
 
 186 
 
 217 
 
 248 
 
 278 
 
 309 
 
 339 
 
 6 
 
 6 
 
 37 
 
 65 
 
 96 
 
 126 
 
 157 
 
 187 
 
 218 
 
 249 
 
 279 
 
 310 
 
 340 
 
 7 
 
 7 
 8 
 
 38 
 
 66 
 
 97 
 
 127 
 
 158 
 
 188 
 
 219 
 
 250 
 
 280 
 
 311 
 
 341 
 
 8 
 
 39 
 
 67 
 
 9 8 
 
 128 
 
 159 
 
 189 
 
 220 
 
 251 
 
 281 
 
 312 
 
 342 
 
 9 
 
 9 
 
 40 
 
 68 
 
 99 
 
 129 
 
 160 
 
 190 
 
 221 
 
 252 
 
 282 
 
 313 
 
 343 
 
 10 
 
 10 
 
 41 
 
 69 
 
 100 
 
 130 
 
 161 
 
 191 
 
 222 
 
 253 
 
 283 
 
 314 
 
 344 
 
 11 
 
 11 
 
 42 
 
 70 
 
 101 
 
 131 
 
 162 
 
 192 
 
 223 
 
 254 
 
 284 
 
 315 
 
 345 
 
 12 
 
 12 
 
 43 
 
 71 
 
 102 
 
 132 
 
 163 
 
 193 
 
 224 
 
 255 
 
 285 
 
 316 
 
 346 
 
 13 
 
 13 
 
 44 
 
 72 
 
 103 
 
 133 
 
 164 
 
 194 
 
 225 
 
 256 
 
 286 
 
 317 
 
 347 
 
 14 
 
 14 
 
 45 
 
 73 
 
 104 
 
 134 
 
 165 
 
 195 
 
 226 
 
 257 
 
 287 
 
 318 
 
 348 
 
 15 
 
 15 
 
 46 
 
 74 
 
 105 
 
 135 
 
 166 
 
 196 
 
 227 
 
 258 
 
 288 
 
 319 
 
 349 
 
 16 
 
 16 
 
 47 
 
 75 
 
 106 
 
 136 
 
 167 
 
 197 
 
 228 
 
 259 
 
 289 
 
 320 
 
 350 
 
 17 
 
 17 
 
 48 
 
 76 
 
 107 
 
 137 
 
 168 
 
 198 
 
 229 
 
 260 
 
 290 
 
 321 
 
 351 
 
 18 
 
 18 
 
 49 
 
 77 
 
 108 
 
 138 
 
 169 
 
 199 
 
 230 
 
 261 
 
 291 
 
 322 
 
 352 
 
 19 
 
 19 
 
 50 
 
 78 
 
 109 
 
 139 
 
 170 
 
 200 
 
 231 
 
 262 
 
 292 
 
 323 
 
 353 
 
 20 
 
 20 
 
 51 
 
 79 
 
 110 
 
 140 
 
 171 
 
 201 
 
 232 
 
 263 
 
 293 
 
 324 
 
 354 
 
 21 
 
 21 
 
 52 
 
 80 
 
 111 
 
 141 
 
 172 
 
 202 
 
 233 
 
 264 
 
 294 
 
 325 
 
 355 
 
 22 
 
 22 
 
 53 
 
 81 
 
 112 
 
 142 
 
 173 
 
 203 
 
 234 
 
 265 
 
 295 
 
 326 
 
 356 
 
 23 
 
 23 
 
 54 
 
 82 
 
 113 
 
 143 
 
 174 
 
 204 
 
 235 
 
 266 
 
 296 
 
 327 
 
 357 
 
 24 
 
 24 
 
 55 
 
 83 
 
 114 
 
 144 
 
 175 
 
 205 
 
 236 
 
 267 
 
 297 
 
 328 
 
 358 
 
 25 
 
 25 
 
 56 
 
 84 
 
 115 
 
 145 
 
 176 
 
 206 
 
 237 
 
 268 
 
 298 
 
 329 
 
 359 
 
 26 
 
 26 
 
 57 
 
 85 
 
 116 
 
 146 
 
 177 
 
 207 
 
 238 
 
 269 
 
 299 
 
 330 
 
 360 
 
 27 
 
 27 
 
 58 
 
 86 
 
 117 
 
 147 
 
 178 
 
 208 
 
 239 
 
 270 
 
 300 
 
 331 
 
 361 
 
 28 
 
 28 
 
 59 f 
 
 87 
 
 118 
 
 148 
 
 179 
 
 209 
 
 240 
 
 271 
 
 301 
 
 332 
 
 362 
 
 29 
 
 29 
 
 
 88 
 
 119 
 
 149 
 
 180 
 
 210 
 
 241 
 
 272 
 
 302 
 
 333 
 
 363 
 
 30 
 
 30 
 
 
 89 
 
 120 
 
 150 
 
 181 
 
 211 
 
 242 
 
 273 
 
 303 
 
 334 
 
 364 
 
 31 
 
 31 
 
 
 90 
 
 
 151 
 
 
 212 
 
 243 
 
 
 304 
 
 
 365 
 
 Table for calculating nu 
 on pages 6 and 7. 
 
 mber of days between two calendar 
 During a leap year, be sure to count 
 
 dates. Its use is explained 
 29 days in February. 
 
 20 
 
and fLCie . . < 
 
 are illustrations of the various University of California grades of beef cattl< 
 Top to bottom on this page are grades 1 and 1-. 
 
 ,_ 
 
 , 
 
 li^^V *3m 
 
 m^: J -r 
 
m 
 
Top bull on opposite page is University of Cali- 
 fornia Grade 2+. 
 
 Bull above grades 3+. 
 
 Bull at the left grades 2. 
 
 Bull at left (below) grades 2- 
 
 Bull below (this page) grades 3-. 
 
 I 
 
 ■.. :|; 
 

 ; «■■ ■'■' 
 ;- ■■■- - ■:■/■ f 
 
 ,-*',*,- 
 
 These thick, deep-bodied, well-grown-out heifers are a desirable type for use as replacements. 
 
 These plain, narrow, upstanding heifers are the type that should be culled from the herd. 
 
 :" \ 
 
 
 Vi- ...»#■■ 
 
 *•■>■«:■*.:: 
 
 ' 
 
 [24] 
 
COMMERCIAL HERDS 
 
 Improvement of commercial herds by 
 selective breeding can be based on a 100- 
 cow herd, with 20 per cent replacement 
 per year. 
 
 Set up your program in this way: 
 
 1. Pick out the top females of breeding 
 age for the select herd. 
 
 2. Weigh and grade cows in selected herd. 
 
 3. Breed this herd in a separate field. 
 
 4. Use the best bulls you have available 
 with the select herd. 
 
 5. Where possible select bulls for rate 
 and efficiency of gain, as well as type, 
 conformation, and pedigree. 
 
 6. At weaning, cull from the select herd 
 those cows that fail to produce good-type 
 growthy calves. 
 
 7. Also at weaning, weigh and grade the 
 calves. 
 
 8. Make first selection of replacement 
 heifers when they are weaned. 
 
 9. Make final selection when heifers are 
 ready to go into breeding herd. 
 
 10. Top heifers should go to the select 
 herd ; others in the general herd. 
 
 11. The select herd may be increased in 
 size to produce all replacements for both 
 herds. 
 
 The select herd 
 40 cows (85 per cent calf crop) produce 
 17 steers for market 
 
 8 replacement for select 
 
 herd 
 17 heifers i 6 replacement for general 
 
 herd 
 3 for market 
 
 The general herd 
 
 60 cows (80 per cent calf crop) produce 
 24 steers for market 
 
 {6 replacement for general 
 herd 
 18 for market 
 
 Select cows and heifers for: 
 
 weight for age; 
 good milking ability; 
 regular breeding ability; 
 good type and conformation; 
 early maturity; and 
 production of top-quality calves. 
 
 Cull cows for: 
 
 age; 
 
 poor milking ability; 
 irregular breeding; and 
 poor type and conformation. 
 
 Selection of individual animals for re- 
 placement purposes in the breeding herd 
 has been practiced by breeders and com- 
 mercial stockmen for many years. It is 
 the basic method by which improvement 
 in quality and changes in the type of 
 domestic livestock have been brought 
 about. 
 
 This process of selection of replace- 
 ment females — plus the use of better bulls 
 and better feeding and management prac- 
 tices — has brought about continued im- 
 provement in the quality of cattle pro- 
 duced on California farms and ranges. 
 
 Two methods may be used in the 
 
 selection of replacement females for the 
 breeding herd. 
 
 (1) The more common method is 
 called "mass selection" or "herd selec- 
 tion." All of the bulls are turned in to 
 the breeding herd; and when the calves 
 are weaned, the best heifers are selected 
 out and held over for replacements. Such 
 a program, carefully followed with top- 
 quality bulls, provides the means for im- 
 proving quality and production. How- 
 ever, it does not use to full advantage 
 animals of superior breeding and quality. 
 An exceptionally good bull, with access 
 to the entire herd, may breed an equal 
 number of good and poor cows. Since the 
 calves will be like their parents, more 
 
 [25] 
 
uniformity and better quality of off- 
 spring may be expected if breeding is 
 restricted to a group of superior animals. 
 (2) The second method, which will 
 produce the most rapid progress, is that 
 of breeding enough of the best cows to 
 the best bulls to supply the heifers neces- 
 sary for replacement. These heifers give 
 greater assurance of breeding true for 
 high production. Such a method requires 
 some planning. It may necessitate addi- 
 tional cross-fencing and other changes in 
 herd management. 
 
 Here is a step-by-step 
 outline to follow: 
 
 1. Management. Separate, well- 
 fenced pastures or fields holding the se- 
 lected herd during the breeding season 
 are necessary. Depending on the size of 
 the herd, available fields, and other facili- 
 ties, dividing the herd into sire groups 
 of 20-40 cows each may be possible. 
 Where this can be done, it will provide 
 for a closer check on the producing abil- 
 ity of individual bulls. 
 
 Good feeding practices must accom- 
 pany a program of selective breeding. 
 Favor the selected herd as to feed, par- 
 ticularly during the breeding season. Un- 
 less replacement heifers are well grown 
 out, they may not fully reveal their in- 
 herited abilities. 
 
 Stock scales are a good investment, 
 since a record of weight for age is ex- 
 tremely helpful in a selective-breeding 
 program. 
 
 2. Selection of cows. About one half 
 of the breeding herd will be required to 
 supply the normal heifer replacement of 
 20 per cent per year in the average range 
 herd. You may wish to begin your selec- 
 tive breeding program with fewer top 
 cows and gradually build up your herd 
 with selected heifers. 
 
 Weaning time is an ideal time to make 
 the first selection. Choose the deep- 
 bodied, thick-fleshed cows that have 
 raised good-quality, heavy calves and 
 still maintain thrifty condition. Consider- 
 
 ation should also be given to lower- 
 grading cows that produce calves above 
 the average in weight and conformation. 
 Regular breeding and long life are im- 
 portant. And while of less importance 
 than some other factors, gentleness is an 
 inherited quality and is reflected in the 
 gains made by steers in the feedlot. 
 
 It is very desirable to obtain the aver- 
 age weight and grade of the selected 
 cows. Cows may be weighed as a group, 
 then each animal graded individually but 
 without the necessity of individually 
 identifying each one. 
 
 3. Identification. Selected cows 
 should be properly identified. Some type 
 of ear mark, wattle, or a well-applied 
 number brand will remain as a perma- 
 nent identification. Eartags are the least 
 satisfactory as they are often pulled out 
 and lost. At the San Joaquin Experimen- 
 tal Range every animal is tattooed in one 
 ear, and the same number is branded on 
 the hip. For example, the number 352 
 means the animal was dropped in 1953 
 and was the fifty-second animal marked. 
 The number 352 is placed in the record 
 book beside the birth date of the animal. 
 Properly identified cows may be run with 
 the entire herd except during the breed- 
 ing season. 
 
 4. Selection of the bull. Use only 
 top-quality range bulls grading 2 or 2+ 
 on the select cow herd. Any information 
 on rate and efficiency of gain and ability 
 to sire high-quality calves should be con- 
 sidered very important in choosing the 
 bull for the select cow herd. The lower- 
 grading bulls (should not grade lower 
 than 2-) can be used on the general herd. 
 Rotation of bulls will help to increase the 
 per cent calf crop. 
 
 5. Weighing and grading calves 
 after weaning. Calves should be 
 weighed and graded at weaning time as 
 was done with the cow herd. Average 
 group weights may be obtained, but aver- 
 age grades will be found by individual 
 grading without regard to individual 
 identification. 
 
 [26 
 
6. Checking cows after weaning, herd. The best heifer calves should be 
 
 When the first calf crop is weaned, the identified for replacement or for increas- 
 
 cows should again be checked carefully ing the size of the selected herd. Surplus 
 
 and those that fail to produce satisfactory heifers can be used as replacements in the 
 
 calves should be returned to the general general herd. 
 
 In order that the information in our publications may be more intelligible it is sometimes necessary 
 to use trade names of products or equipment rather than complicated descriptive or chemical iden- 
 tifications. In so doing it is unavoidable in some cases that similar products which are on the market 
 under other trade names may not be cited. No endorsement of named products is intended nor is 
 criticism implied of similar products which are not mentioned. 
 
 Cooperative Extension work in Agriculture and Home Economic?. College of Agriculture, University of California, and United States Department of Agriculture 
 co-operating. Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8, and June 30, 1914. George B. Alcorn, Director, California Agricultural Extension Service. 
 
 15m-3,'56(B1173) 
 
A simple ADJUSTED WEIGHT SCALE 
 
 Here's a means of estimating weights of 
 calves at a constant 240 days. Use a straight 
 edge to connect the appropriate figures in the 
 two outside columns . . . read the answer in 
 the center column. 
 
 Actual age in 
 days at time 
 of weaning 
 
 - 130 
 
 ~ 135 
 
 ■ 190 
 — 195 
 
 zr 200 
 
 ■ 205 
 
 ■ 210 
 ' 215 
 
 =~ 220 
 =- 225 
 ="- 230 
 1 235 
 
 240 
 
 245 
 
 250 
 
 255 
 
 260 
 
 265 
 
 270 
 
 275 
 
 Connect th 
 
 Actual weight 
 
 in pounds at 
 
 time of weaninc 
 
 Estimated weight 
 
 in pounds at 240 
 
 days of age 
 
 Read answer in 
 this column 
 
 60( 
 59( 
 53( 
 57' 
 56( 
 55( 
 54 ( 
 53( 
 52( 
 51C 
 50( 
 49( 
 4SC 
 47C 
 46C 
 45C 
 44C 
 -£343( 
 -342C 
 41C 
 40: 
 39C 
 33C 
 37C 
 36( 
 35( 
 34( 
 33( 
 
 -3 31C 
 
 30C 
 
 is column 
 
 . . with this column 
 
Please use this scale instead of the one 
 appearing on the back cover of Circular 451 . 
 
 Actual age in 
 days at time 
 of weaning 
 
 Estimated weight 
 
 in pounds at 240 
 
 days of age 
 
 Read answer in ^ 
 this column T 
 
 Actual weight 
 
 in pounds at 
 
 time of weaning 
 
 Connect this column