..LIBRARY (>F TIIK UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Received . Accessions No. Shelf No. POPERY IN ALLIANCE WITH HEATHENISM: LETTERS PROVING THAT WHERE THE BIBLE IS WHOLLY UNKNOWN, AS IN THE HEATHEN WORLD, OR ONLY PARTIALLY KNOWN, AS IN THE ROMISH CHURCH, IDOLATRY AND SUPERSTITION ARE INEVITABLE. BY JOHN POYNDER, ESQ. " ...................... Ubi passim " Palantes error certo de tramite pellit ; " Ille sinistrorsum, hie dextrorsum abit ; unus utrique " Error, sed variis illudit partibus. . . ........... " Hon. LONDON : J. HATCHARD AND SON, 187, PICCADILLY; SEELEY AND SONS, FLEET-STREET; AND ALL OTHER BOOKSELLERS. 1835. LONDON I tBOTSOV AND PAI.MFR, PRINTERS, SAVOY-STREET, STRAND. CONTENTS. LETTER PAGE 1. On the Use of Incense, and Holy Water . .17 2. On the Lights burnt in Pagan and Papal Temples; and the Votive Offerings of Heathenism and Popery . 21 3. On the Votive Offerings of Heathenism and Popery. (Continued.) . ... 26 4. On the Alliance between the Deities of Paganism, and the Saints of Popery . . . .30 5. On the Conformity between Heathen Deification, and Romish Canonization . . .34 6. On the Alliance between the Image Worship of Hea- thenism and of Popery . . . .36 7. A Refutation of the Papist's Assertion that Images are not Worshipped, but only used as Aids to Devotion . 42 8. On the Alliance between the Artifices of the Pagan and Papal Priests in supporting the Credit of their Idols . 48 9 . On the Conformity between the Prodigies of Heathenism, and the Miracles of Popery . . 54 10. On the Identity of the Refuge, or Protection afforded to Criminals under the Pagan and Papal systems the similarity of the two Priesthoods, and of the Religious Orders and Fraternities of Heathenism and Popery . 59 11. On the Conformity between the Religious Processions of the Heathens, and those of the Papists . . 64 4 CONTENT*. LETTER PAGE 12. On the Agreement between the Water Idolatry of the Heathens and the Papists . . .67 13. The same subject continued . . .72 14. On the Conformity between Purgatory and Transub- stantiation . . . .76 15. On the Identity of Heathen and Romish Pilgrimages 81 16. On the Alliance between the perpetual Sacrifices of Heathenism, and the perpetual Sacrifice of the Mass 87 17. On the Agreement between Heathen and Romish Exorcism . . . .95 18. The Agreement between Heathen and Romish Exor- cism further considered, with a Refutation of the pre- tended Continuance of this and other Miracles in the Church of Rome . . . .99 19. On the analogous Nature of the Expiation of Sin, by Money, in the Heathen and Romish Churches, and the Analogy between other Pagan and Papal Atone- ments for Sin the Conformity between the Stories of the Pagan Deities and the Romish Saints between the Ancient and Modern Idolatry in producing actual Vice between Abstinence from Food in the two Sys- tems and between the supreme Power of the respec- tive Priesthoods . . . .105 20. Concluding Reflections on the preceding Facts . 113 PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. IN sending a second Edition of this little work to press, the writer would gladly, in compliance with the sugges- tion of more than one friend, have altered the epithet of " POPERY," in the title-page, as designating the Roman Catholic religion, had he not deemed it, upon mature con- sideration, more correct to retain the former term, for the following reasons. First, that in employing that word, he only follows all those who have appeared on the side of the Protestant faith, ever since a protest was made against the errors of the Romish creed. Until, therefore, it can be shown that Cicero was mistaken, when he said, " Magister optimus est Usus," the value of precedent will perhaps be allowed its proper weight. Secondly, in turning to the definition of Dr. Johnson, we find that " Popery" is described by that accurate etymologist, as * c the religion of the Church of Rome." Now, until the members of that church can shew that Popery is not the religion of the Church of Rome, but some other religion, it is clear that no wrong is done them by the application of the term ; and if it be not competent to them to dispute this title, then how much less right have any members of our own church to suggest that injury is inflicted in the case in question ! If the members of the Church of Rome O PREFACE. be any thing else than Papists, they then renounce, ipso facto, the authority of the Pope, but so long as they con- tinue to acknowledge him, either for their civil or eccle- siastical head, So long are they Papists, and so long is Popery their religion, as Dr. Johnson expressly defines it to be. Thirdly, if, in compliance with modern liberality, or rather with the affectation of it, Protestants were now to change this designation, it is obvious that such circum- stance would not affect any existing fact, or alter the na- ture of things, since it would be still as true that the mem- bers of the Romish church either acknowledge allegiance to its temporal head, or are found in alliance with its spi- ritual head, notwithstanding that certain members of our own church may prefer to suppress all recognition, both of the one and the other connexion. For these reasons, I cannot but prefer the original term by which our Protes- tant ancestors (who were at least as well informed on this subject as ourselves) agreed to designate the religion of the church of Rome. It is still, however, with the most anxious and sincere desire for the best, and highest, interests of the Romish laity, that I would entreat them to consider how far the unqualified deference paid by them, not merely to a man like themselves, but to one whom the Holy Scriptures charac- terise as eminently " the man of sin," and whom all history agrees in proving to have remarkably deserved that title, from the beginning how far, I say, such implicit deference to human authority can consist with the allegiance due to the only Lord and Saviour, who is the head over all things to his church ; how far the erection of tradition into an equal rank with the express revelation of God, can consist with the exclusive reverence, which is claimed by the Almighty for the inspired oracles of divine truth ; and whether the single fact of these records of eternal life being kept from the people at large, to this very hour, by the authority of any man, or set of men, does not, of itself, demonstrate, beyond all dispute, an unsound and indefen- sible state of things, which dreads and deprecates inquiry, PREFACE. as depending for its continued existence upon the extent of the darkness and ignorance which may prevail in the world, reminding us of a passage in that accurate observer of human nature, Shakspeare We of th' offending side " Must keep aloof from strict arbitrament, " And stop all sight-holes, every loop from whence " The eye of reason may pry in upon us." Unwilling to offer the slightest offence, by any single term, or phrase, which it might be possible, consistently with truth, to expunge, or modify, I beg unequivocally to assure my fellow-subjects, of the Romish laity, that I feel the most sincere affection for their persons, while I entertain no respect for their system that I view, with the deepest commiseration, that spiritual bondage in which they continue to be held ; while I can entertain no such sympathy for those " blind guides" who presume to exact an obedience for which they can shew no warrant from Scripture, and no justification, on the ground of right reason, or common sense. Let them only once resolve to judge for themselves, and to take the Scriptures of truth as their guides, and they will at once throw off the yoke from which it was the glory of our own Reformation to deliver us. It is evident that there is no extent of doc- trinal error denounced by our blessed Lord as upholding the spiritual dominion of the interpreters of his law in the Jewish church, which does not, with equal, or greater, force apply to the ecclesiastical professors of his gospel in the church of Rome; and if this fact required con- firmation, the late complete exposure by the Irish Pro- testant clergy, in the British metropolis, of the anti-scrip- tural casuistry long taught in the United Kingdom, with the sanction of episcopal and sacerdotal authority, would abundantly establish it.* * I allude to the two celebrated meetings at Exeter Hall, in Lon- don, on the 20th of June, and llth of July, 1835, at which Lord Kenyon presided. O PREFACE. It is really painful to reflect, that notwithstanding the boasted light of the present age, so many persons who are respectable and amiable in all the relations of life, should deliver themselves up, as if divested of their eyes and ears, to the usurped dominion of the Papal hierarchy, when the slightest attention to the primitive institution of Christianity, would reveal to them the Saviour of sin- ners in all his fulness, requiring no mediators by whom he is to be approached, but able and willing as the one only mediator between an offended God, and his guilty creatures to save to the uttermost all that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make interces- sion for them inviting all, without exception, or restric- tion, to take of the water of life freely, and proposing to our faith that single sacrifice, and those transcendant merits, as alone atoning for sin, and justifying the offender, which all the institutions and ceremonies of the papal church, tend only to obscure, and invalidate. Nor let it be supposed that this attempt to be useful to the laity of the Romish church, is the act of an enemy, rather than the intention of a friend. It is not, indeed, reasonable to expect that truth can always be told, with- out offence, when even an apostle found it necessary to appeal to his readers in that remarkable expostulation " Am I your enemy, because I tell you the truth ?" " It is not easy" (says Hooker) " to speak to the con- " tentation of minds exulcerated in themselves, but that " somewhat there will be always which displeaseth." To those who think that every thing in the form of controversy should be avoided, I would observe, in the language of Lord Bacon " Neuters in contentions are " either better, or worse, than either side," leaving it to themselves to consider to which class they belong while to those who may be disposed to cavil at some strength of expression in the conduct of my argument, I would add, in the language of the same illustrious writer " Earnest writing must not hastily be condemned, for " men cannot contend coldly, and without affection, about PREFACE. 9 " things which they hold dear and precious. A politic " man may write from his brain, without touch and sense " of his heart, as in a speculation which appertained! not " unto him ; but a feeling Christian will express, in his " words, a character of zeal, and love." Again, I ask, that He who has all hearts in his hand, may accompany this publication with his blessing, and cause it to issue in his glory. London, Nov. 5th, 1835. O PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. THE celebrated Dr. Middleton, the translator of Cicero, and the librarian of Cambridge, who was an eye-witness of the abominations which he records, has furnished the basis of the following Letters, in that able Letter which he wrote from Rome, entitled " The Conformity between Paganism " and Popery." The writer of the following Letters has however been indebted to other sources of information, and more especially to the observations of an able writer on Indian affairs, long resident in that country ; * which tend to establish the same connexion between the heathenism of papal Rome, and of pagan India, at the present moment, as may be traced between Rome under the Christian popes, and under the Heathen emperors. Proofs of a similar identity have also presented themselves in the corruptions of Popery at present existing in a portion of the united Empire, which afford a perfect transcript of the worst abuses of the ancient idolatry of the Gentile world. To this latter spot, certain persons occasionally resort who are advocates for what they term a liberal and en- lightened policy, although they there witness the utmost degradation of their species, in the unlimited power exer- cised by the Romish priesthood over the consciences and persons of their bigoted adherents; but it is impossible that * The late Charles Grant, Esq., M. P., formerly Chairman of the East India Company. B 2 12 men of real religion should witness the idolatries which de- file that country, and observe such superstitions as had scarcely their counterpart in heathen lands, (all prac- tised, be it remembered, under the eye, and with the sanction, of the popish hierarchy and clergy of Ireland,) it is impossible, I say, that such persons should witness scenes like these, without contemplating idolatry in the same light in which the Bible exhibits it, and without abhorring those pollutions of doctrine and practice which the word of God invariably represents as perilous in the extreme, both to those who profess, and those who patronize them. In consequence of the large accession, in Protestant England, to the numbers of those who profess the Romish faith, and of the great increase both of their places of wor- ship, and religious establishments, since the concession of the Romish claims, the attention of the Protestant public appears, more than ever, due to the consideration of the difference existing between their own, and the Romish church. If it can be shown that there is a near alliance between the Romish religion and the Heathen religion, the difference between the Church of England and the Church of Rome will be rendered still more apparent. I propose, therefore, to consider the conformity between Popery and Paganism, premising only that I do not wholly pretend to originality, but am indebted to the valuable writers already alluded to, for many of these remarks. The more learned of my readers, whose attention may never have been turned this way, will not be displeased to find their thoughts di- verted into a new channel ; while such as are in quest of truth will hail every attempt to enlighten the world upon the subject of the gross superstitions of modern idolatry, in a professedly Christian church, and their connexion with the ancient idolatry of the Heathens, before the introduc- tion of Christianity. If the following be a faithful and correct statement of the conformity between heathenism and popery, what did any members of our own church, our government, or our parliament, promise themselves or their cause, by the sup- PREPACK. 13 port they may have tendered to the Roman Catholic claims ? Why were they not rather found on the side of the ark of God, when their ancient foes were unusually vigilant and active? " If Baal be God, follow him ; but if the Lord " be God, then follow him." The Roman Catholic ques- tion was never one of a merely political or secular nature, nor were the interests which it involves of a secondary or subordinate character. The state of suspense and jeopardy in which the Protestant Church was long periodically placed, terminated at last in concession to the claims of the Roman Catholics, because certain persons, who might and ought to have known better, determined to regard this question as one of mere human policy, without permitting the paramount consideration of religion I mean the fun- damental difference between the Protestant and Popish Creeds to form a part of their calculations, or to influence their conclusions. So long as this great question was merely argued upon principles of secular expediency, it is no mat- ter of surprise that sagacious statesmen were taken in their own craftiness, and that they were unable, under their mode of treating the subject, to deal with arguments which were at least as plausible, if not as valid, as their own. They ought to have taken higher ground, and have resolved to stand by the constitution, which would then have stood by them. If they had reasoned about the religious abo- minations, and political evils, of popery as did Queen Eli- zabeth, and King William, Lord Burleigh, and Lord Bacon, Sir John Temple, and Lord Clarendon, Sir Matthew Hale, and Bishop Burnet, their difficulties would have vanished at once ; they would then have stood firmly on the rock which the providence of God, and the wisdom of their an- cestors, had placed under their feet; nor would all the sophistry of crafty and designing men have moved them from the true interests of our Protestant empire, or induced them to yield one inch of that sacred ground for which our martyrs had bled at the stake, and our warriors had tri- umphed in the field. If peace had been their object, they should have taken a statesmanlike view of this great ques- 14 I-EEFACE. tion in all its breadth and length, and have considered that although a temporary and hollow peace might be obtained by conceding to Papists, a portion of civil, and political, of legislative and executive power, yet that such characters must have been traitors to their own church and cause, if they could rest satisfied with a moderate share of that power, or with anything less than ascendancy for their own church and party. This fearful experiment however has been made. It may possibly follow that the real Protes- tants of this country (I do not mean the nominal ones,) who are far too enlightened and too free to breathe in the same atmosphere as popery, and still less, to witness pa- tiently its daily encroachments, or submit to its galling yoke, will be heard in their turn. If the people of this country could not endure the pretensions of popery at the great epochs of the Reformation, and the Revolution, much less is it likely that they will endure them now, when a greater degree of religious light is diffused over the nation, and when the principles of civil liberty are better under- stood than ever. It is only, however, as the religious character of popery is properly estimated by the nation at large, that a success- ful stand can eventually be made against her pretensions whether ecclesiastical or civil ; and the time appears to have arrived, when every member of the Protestant church, who supposes he may have any thing to contribute to the general stock, is bound, with the humble female commended by our Lord, to do what he can ; and with another, who was equally honoured with his approbation, to cast his mite into the common treasury. The present attempt is, indeed, no more ; but such as it is, may it please the great Head of the church, ( " without whom nothing is strong, nothing is " holy, 11 ) to favour it with his blessing, and to crown it witli success ! And since, in the degree that we are brought to understand the worldly and intriguing character of the re- ligion of " the Man of Sin," we shall be the better able to estimate the value of the reformed religion we profess, I shall conclude with a passage from Bishop Burnet's Abridg- PREPACK. 15 ment of his own History of the Reformation, the whole of which Preface indeed, has as remarkable an application to the present times, as if expressly designed for them.* " That Religion is chiefly designed for perfecting the " nature of man, for improving his faculties, governing his " actions, and securing the peace of his own conscience* " and of society in general, is a truth so plain, that without " further arguing upon it, all will agree to it. Every part " of religion, then, is to be judged by its relation to the " main ends of it ; and since the Christian doctrine was re- " vealed from heaven, as the most perfect and suitable way " that ever was, for advancing the good of mankind, no- " thing can be a part of this holy faith, but what is propor- " tioned to the end for which it was designed ; and all the " additions that have been made to it, since it was first deli- " vered to the world, are justly to be suspected; especially " where it is manifest, at first view, that they were intended " to serve carnal, and secular ends. What can be rea- " sonably supposed, in the papacy, where the Popes are " chosen by such intrigues, either of the two crowns, the " nephews of the former Pope, or the craft of some aspiring " men, to entitle them to infallibility or universal jurisdic- " tion? What can we think of redeeming souls out of " purgatory, or preserving them from it, by tricks, or some " mean pageantry, but that it is a foul piece of merchandise ? " What is to be said of implicit obedience, of the priestly " dominion over consciences, of the keeping the Scriptures " out of the people's hands, and the worship of God in a " strange tongue, but that these are so many arts to hood- i( wink the world, and to deliver it up into the hands of an " ambitious clergy ? What can we think of superstition " and idolatry of images, and all the other pomp of the " Romish worship, but that by these things the people " were to be kept in a gross notion of religion, as a " splendid business, and that the priests have the art of * This valuable abridgement, by Buriiet himself, of his voluminous history, was recently reprinted by the University of Oxford at a mode- rate charge. 16 PREFACE. " saving them, if they will but take care to humour them, " and leave that matter wholly in their hands ? And, to " sum up all, what can we think of that constellation of " prodigies in the sacrament of the altar, as they pretend " to explain it, but that it is an art to bring the world, by " wholesale, to renounce their reason, and sense, and to " have a most wonderful veneration for a race of men " who can, with a word, perform the most astonishing " thing that ever was ?" LETTERS, &c. LETTER I. Ow the use of Incense, and Holy Water. THE USE OF INCENSE. This is a custom which has descended in a straight line from Heathenism, as is evident from Homer, Virgil, Theocritus, and Ovid. The first Christian martyrs opposed the use of Incense with such fortitude, that the mode of trying and convicting them under the heathen emperors, was merely to require them to throw a grain of it into the censer, or on the altar, which they as invariably refused, and for which refusal they forfeited their lives. (See Act. Martyr. Nicandri apud Mabill. Iter. Ital. vol. i. p. 247; Durant. de Ritibus, 1. 1. c. 9; Jerome's Works, vol. iv. Epist. ad Heliod.) and under the Christian Emperors, the rite was considered by the early Christians as so peculiarly heathenish, that the very places or houses where incense could be proved to have been offered were by a law of Theodosius confiscated to the Government. (See Gothorf de Stat. Paganor. sub Christian. Imper. leg. 12, p. 15.) In all the old sculptures of heathen sacrifice, may be seen a boy in a sacred habit attending the priest, with a small box of incense for the altar. (See Montfaucon Antiq. vol. ii. plate 23.) Thus in the church of Rome, a boy attends the priest, with the sacred utensils, especially the incense vessel, of which the priest makes abundant use through the service, by waving it round, and over, the altar : and thus at this moment in 18 THE USE OF HOLY WATER. [LETTER I. China, the use of Incense is a part of their idolatry. " In this temple," (says one of the suite in the late Em- bassy to China,) " I found a print of the head of our " Saviour, and incense vessels placed before it. The priest " showed me a book containing the service which he said " they read when they worshipped this picture." And again, " I am now writing to you from a temple in which " are upwards of a hundred priests, and as many Idols. " About fifty priests worship (with morning and evening " prayers) images of Buddah. There are three hundred " images placed on aline: before these, the priests burn " tapers, offer incense, and recite prayers, sometimes " kneeling, and repeating, over and over again, invocations ; " and sometimes putting the forehead to the ground in " token of adoration, submission, and supplication." (See this letter at length, in the Times Journal of the 17th Sept. 1817.) THE USE OF HOLY WATER. No member of the Romish Church ever enters, or quits, a church without being sprinkled with it, which is performed by the priest on solemn days, while on common occasions, the person helps himself from a vessel at the door. This practice is so notoriously derived from heathenism, that the Romish writers are obliged to avow it. Lacerda the Jesuit in a note on Virgil, (Mn. vi. 230,) says, " Hence was derived " the custom of our holy church to provide purifying or "holy water at the entrance of the churches." (See note in loco.) Montfaucon says, the aquaminarium was a vase of holy water placed by the heathens at the entrance of their Temples to sprinkle themselves with. (See Antiq. t. ii. p. 1. 1. iii. c. 6. and Europ. lone. v. 96.) Croesus gave two of these vessels to the Temple of Apollo at Delphos. (See Herodot. 1. 1. 51. and Clem. Alex. Strom. 1. 1.) Indeed, the Heathens' custom of sprinkling was so essential a part of all their religious offices, that their mode of excommunica- tion was by forbidding offenders the use of the holy water. (See ^Eschin. Orat. contr. Ctesiphon 58.) The very com- position of the holy water was also the same among the LETTER I.] THE USE OF HOLY WATER. 19 pagans as among the papists, being simply a mixture of salt with common water. (Theocritus 95; Durant de Rit. 1. i. c. 21.) The form of the sprinkling brush, (the aspersorium,) which is much the same with what the priests now use, may be seen in bas-reliefs and ancient coins, where- ever the insignia or emblems of the pagan priesthood appear. (See Montfaucon's Antiq. t. ii. p. 1. 1. iii. c. 6. and Agostini's Discorso sopra le Medaglie.) Platina in his Lives of the Popes, and other authors, ascribe the institution of holv water to pope Alexander I. who lived about one hundred and thirteen years after Christ; but it could not have been introduced so early, since we find the primitive Fathers, some ages after, treating it as a custom purely heathenish, and condemning it as impious and detestable ; one of them in particular observing, that " it was invented by the " devil, in imitation of the true Baptism signified by the " prophets, in order that their votaries might also have <4 their pretended purifications by water." (Justin. Martyr. Apol. J. p. 91.) The heathen Emperor Julian, in opposi- tion to the Christians, used to order the victuals in the markets to be sprinkled with holy water, with a view of either starving them, or obliging them to eat what by their own principles they esteemed polluted. (See Hospinian de orig. Templor, 1. ii. c. 25.) Hence we may see what opposite opinions the primitive Church, and the Romish Church, have entertained on holy water. The early Christians condemned it as superstitious, abominable, and heathenish ; the Roman Catholics adopt it, as highly con- ducive to Christian piety : the first Christians esteemed it a contrivance of the devil to delude mankind : the Romish Church regards it as a security against the delusions of the devil. The absurdity of this ceremony may appear from the long enumeration which may be found in many Popish writers, of the virtues and benefits derived from its use, both to the soul and body : (See Durant de Ritib. 1. i. c. 21 ; and Hospinian, ibid. &c.) while, to complete this absurdity, along roll of miracles is produced to attest the certainty of the several virtues ascribed to it. See 20 THE USE OF HOLY WATER. [l.KTTER I. Durant de Rit. 1. i. c. 21.) The remark, therefore, of Ovid, upon the error of paganism on the subject of holy water, applies with equal force to the delusion of Popery on the same point : " Ah nimium faciles, qui tristia crimina caedis " Fluminea tolli posse putetis aqua !" OVID, Fast. 2. 45. Holy water was also used at the heathen funerals, as it is now at the popish funerals. (See Kennett's Rom. Antiq. p. 358; and Virg. ^En. 6.) " Socios pura circumtulitunda!" The Romish Church, however, proceeds much farther than the heathens in the use of holy water, since there is a yearly festival in Rome peculiarly devoted to the purifying or blessing of horses, asses, and other cattle, vulgarly called the Benediction of Horses, which is celebrated with much solemnity, in the month of January, when all the inhabi- tants of the city and neighbourhood send their horses, asses, &c. to the convent of St. Anthony, near the church of St. Mary the Great, where a priest in his surplice, at the church door, sprinkles, with his brush, all the animals singly, as they are presented to him. The advantage de- rived by the animals, on this occasion, may probably be about the same as accrues to their owners ; but the priest, at all events, does not lose his reward, since there is a gratuity of tant par tite payable for his zeal and ability. (See Middleton's letter; Rom. Modern. Giorn. 6. c. 46 ; Rione de Monti, and Mabillon's Iter. Ital. p. 136.) Dr. James Edward Smith also notices this gross abomination of modern heathenism (of which he was an eye witness) in the following terms : " On the 17th of Jan. being St. " Anthony's day, we witnessed the ceremony of blessing all " the horses, asses, and mules in the town, which were led, " decked out with ribbands, to one of the doors of the " church of this saint, where a priest stood ready to "sprinkle them with holy water: some of these animals " took it with much greater devotion than others, who LETTER II.] LIGHTS IN THE TEMPLES. 21 " seemed much frightened at the holy sprinkling. This " is performed every year, and the Doge is always pre- " sent a laudable co-operation of church and state, who " wisely keep one another in countenance in this holy " and beneficial ceremony." (See his Tour to the Conti- nent, vol. i. p. 258.) The only thing in heathen antiquity which appears to resemble this custom is, the sprinkling their horses with water in the Circensian games : (see Rubenii Elect. 2. 18:) but it is not clear whether super- stition dictated that usage in order to purify them (the races being esteemed sacred) or merely to prepare them for the physical exertion of the race. The ingenuity of the Romish priests, however, in converting so coarse a mo- dification of superstition into the means of their support, is sufficiently remarkable. LETTER II. On the Lights burnt in Pagan and Papal Temples ; and the Votive offerings of Heathenism and Popery. THE LAMPS AND CANDLES BURNING IN CATHOLIC CHURCHES AND CHAPELS IN BROAD DAYLIGHT, afford another example of heathen conformity. Mabillon ob- serves on this custom, in his It. Ital. p. 25 ; but every one has witnessed its frequency. Now the perpetual lamps and candles of the heathen worship are constantly adverted to by their authors, as burning before the altars and statues of their Deities, as they now do before the shrines and images of the Romish superstition; (See Plin. Hist. Nat. 1. xxxiv. 3, Cic. in Verr. 2. Virg. JEn. 4-200.) Herodotus states that the Egyptians, who first introduced the use of lights into their idolatrous temples, (Clem. Alex. Strom. 1. i. c. 16.) had a grand yearly festival, called, from its chief business, the lighting up of candles: 22 LIGHTS IN THE TEMPLES. [LETTER II. (Herod. 1. ii. 62. Lond. edit. :) but there is scarcely a single festival of Papal Rome to which this phrase might not be justly applied. The primitive Christians exposed the folly and absurdity of this heathenish custom, little dreaming that their successors would adopt it. (Hospin. de Orig. Templor. 1 ii. 22.) " They light up candles to " God," says Lactantius, speaking of the heathens, " as if " he lived in the dark : but do not they deserve to rank as " madmen who offer lamps to the Author and Giver of " light ?" In the old heathen inscriptions are many instances of presents of lamps and candlesticks from individuals to the temples and altars of them that were no gods. (See Grut. Inscr. 177, 3.) This practice continues in modern Rome, where each church abounds with lamps of massy silver, and sometimes of gold, the gifts of princes and others. The principal saints and miraculous images of popish countries have lamps perpetually burning before them, as St. Anthony of Padua, St. Charles Borromeo of Milan, and the Lady of Loretto ; and the votaries of less distinguished places of worship are lighted in like manner to their devotions, in the broad blaze of each day's sun, by humble ends of holy candle, stuck about the altars of the several chapels and oratories, in honour of the particular saint whose image is there set up, and before which images they are found duly prostrating themselves, with all the ceremonies of a more ancient form of worship. A man has only to cross over from Dover to Calais to witness this mummery in perfection. " They light them candles, yea " more than for themselves, whereof they" (the idols) " cannot see one." (Baruch, ch. vi. v. 19-) " The super- " stitious use of lights in the church by day, is an affront " done both to the Sun in the heaven, and to the Sun of " Righteousness in the Church." (Archbishop Leightori's Lustre of the Church,) A reference to the first letter will show that the idolaters of China are lighted to their devo- tions at the present, moment, precisely in the same way. THE OFFERINGS AND VOTIVE GIFTS HUNG UP IN CATHOLIC PLACES OF WORSHIP, IN GRATITUDE FOR DE- LETTER II.] VOTIVE OFFERINGS. 23 LIVERANCES FROM DANGER AND CURES IN SICKNESS, may be identified with the votive offerings of the heathens in their temples on similar occasions. No practice was more common among the Pagans, as the classical reader will well know. (See Montfauc. Antiq. t. ii. p. 1, 1. iv. c. 4, Hor. passim, &c.) Their original donaria, or votive offerings, are preserved to this hour in the cabinets of the curious ; and in the British museum are various figures of eyes, feet, hands, breasts, and other parts of the body, formerly hung up in the heathen temples, in testimony of cures supposed to be performed by their tutelar deities in those particular parts ; but the most common of the offerings were pictures representing the history of some miraculous cure or de- liverance vouchsafed upon the vow of the donor. For a remarkable example, take Tibullus: " Nunc, Dea, mine succurre mihi, nam posse mederi " Picta docet templis miilta tabella tuis." El. 1, 3. It may be true, that the infidels of antiquity ridiculed this practice of heathenism, as the infidels of France ridi- culed the absurdities of Popery ; but it is equally true, that the practice itself prevailed in both cases, and is a constituent part of each religion. Cicero relates, that a friend of Diagoras the philosopher once said to him in a temple, " You who think the gods take no notice of human affairs, do not you see by this number of pictures, how many people, for the sake of their vows, have been saved in storms at sea, and got safe into harbour?"'' t; Yes," said Diagoras, " I see how it is ; for those persons are " never painted who happened to be drowned." (Cic. Nat. Deor. 1. iii. 253.) The temples of ^Esculapius were more especially rich in these offerings, which Livy says, were " the price and pay for the cures that he had wrought for " the sick." (Liv. 1. xlv. 28.) Here they used always to hang up in tables of brass or marble, a list of all the miraculous cures which that Deity was supposed to have performed. (See Strabo, t. i. 515.) A remarkable fragment of one of 24 VOTIVE OFFERINGS. [LETTER II. these tables still exists, and the inscription is recorded by Gruter. (See his Inscript., p. 71.) It was found in the ruins of one of his temples at Rome ; and Montfaucon ob- serves upon it, that " it proves either the artifice of the " devil to deceive the credulous, or else the tricks of the " Pagan priests, by suborning men to counterfeit diseases " and miraculous cures ;" (see Montf. Antiq. t. ii. p. 1, 1. iv. c. 6 ;) a remark equally applicable to the pretended mira- cles of modern, as of ancient Rome. Now this piece of superstition had been found much too profitable to the heathen priesthood to be overlooked by the Romish clergy, and was, therefore, engrafted upon the worship of Popery, and reigns at this hour in as full vigour as in the ages of Pagan idolatry. This superstition was so gross, as to dis- gust some of their own communion. Polydore Virgil, after describing this practice of the heathens, observes, " In " the same manner do we now offer up in our churches little " images of wax ; and when any part of the body is hurt, as " the hand or foot, we make a vow to God, or to one of his " saints, to whom, on our recovery, we offer that hand or " foot in wax, which custom is now come to that extrava- " gance, that we do the same thing for our oxen, horses, and " sheep!" (Pol, Virg. de Inv. Rer. 1. v. i.) Baronius ob- serves, that " the altar of St. Philip Neri shines with votive " pictures and images, the proofs of asmany miracles, receiv- " ing every day the additional splendour of fresh offerings " from those who have been favoured with fresh benefits,"" (Baron. Ann. 1. An. 57, v. 162 ; It. A ring. Rom. Subter. 1. 1. c. 30.) Among these votaries, a late Pope offered a yearly acknowledgment to this saint, for a miraculous de- liverance which he fancied he had obtained through his invocation.. It would be endless to enumerate the patron saints of the late Pope ; but from his revival of the holy office of the Inquisition, and the unholy order of Jesuits,* * The " History of the Jesuits," lately published, (but now, I believe, with difficulty to be obtained,) proves that this order is only a corrupt modification of the Papal system, and that its members have ever been LETTER ]!.] VOTIVE OFFERINGS, 25 it is generally supposed, that he considers himself mainly indebted to Saint Dominic, and Saint Ignatius, and that he has taken the most effectual method of discharging his per- the most active agents of the Romish church, and have most effectu- ally forwarded its designs upon the happiness and liberties of mankind, in furtherance of which objects, they have not scrupled to employ PER- SECUTION^ in all its forms, both civil and religious. It is further provec^ that the Jesuits at this time occupy a very strong position in the centre of this Protestant country the College of Stonyhurst, near Preston which is in constant communion and correspondence with another Jesuits' College in Ireland, and with the Continent at large. That the constitution and rules of the society sanction practices opposed to the dictates of religion, and hostile to the safety of sove- eigns and governments. That in the two centuries of their existence, the Jesuits were the authors of almost all the calamities which deso- lateo the world at large, and Europe in particular, especially the Pro- testant part of it. That, to doctrines of the most pernicious tendency, both in morals and politics, they added practices, in each, of a nature utterly indefensible. That the agents employed by them in the prose- cution of their objects have been, almost exclusively, members of the Romish communion, who have ever been their willing instruments, and that inasmuch as the concessions of the late reign (especially the grant of the elective franchise) have greatly increased the number and influence of Roman Catholics, both in England and Ireland, the connexion which has always subsisted between the Jesuits and them- selves assumes the more importance, and threatens the greater danger to a Protestant nation and government. That the circumstance of the Jesuits having now established themselves in such force amongst our- selves, is part of the system of achieving by fraud what cannot be effected by force. That numerous converts from the Protestant to the Romish communion have been already made in our own country through the indefatigable activity of these agents ; and that the work of conversion is proceeding with remarkable success at this moment, more particularly in the inland counties : and finally, that the late Pope, in reviving an Order which was abolished by Pope Clement XIV. on the supplication of the whole of Europe, (both Catholic and Pro- testant,) and in assigning to it, at the same time, the aid of the IN- QUISITION, (its oldest and best ally,) has himself acted upon the great principle of Jesuitism, viz. that the end to be accomplished will sanction the means which may be used, and has effectually provided for the revival of all those moral and political evils which are insepa- rable from the employment of such agents. Notwithstanding these facts, Mr. CHARLES BUTLER, in his last work, eulogized this Order in 26 VOTIVE OFFERINGS. [LETTER III. sonal obligations at the expense of the whole civilized world a mode of evincing his gratitude riot quite so harm- less as that adopted by the late king of Sardinia, who was content to display his sense of piety, merely by assuming the habit of St. Ignatius, a taste in which his Majesty might, perhaps, have been much more safely indulged. LETTER III. The Votive Offerings of Heathenism and Popery. [CONTINUED.] A FEW more words on the VOTIVE OFFERINGS of Popery, as allied to those of heathenism. I have before adverted to Calais as presenting a good specimen near home, of the pro- fusion of lights burning in broad day on the altars of their saints. The rude pictures of the poor misguided fishermen in the churches of Calais, in honour of the Virgin Mary, furnish a fine example of votive offerings. Indeed, the Virgin Mary seems to have done wonders in this way ; so that what Juvenal said of the goddess Isis may be applied to her, that the painters get their livelihood out of her. " Pictores quis nescit ab Iside pasci ?" These donaria, or votive offerings of Popery, are generally close copies of their heathen originals : in each case the vow is said to be divinely inspired, or expressly commanded, and the cure or deliverance is stated to have been wrought either by the visible appearance, and immediate hand, of the highest terms, and publicly stood forth as its champion, in defiance of the clearest case of moral and political turpitude ever established ; indeed the Roman Catholics at large (as might have been expected) have pursued the same course, and have thus identified themselves with the same system. LETTER TII.J VOTIVE OFFERINGS. 27 the tutelar saint, (a gross delusion,) or by the notice of a dream, or other miraculous intimation from Heaven. " There can be no doubt," says one of their celebrated writers, " but that the images of our saints often work " signal miracles by procuring health to the infirm, and by " appearing to us often in dreams to suggest something of " great moment for our service. (Durant de Ritib. l.i. c.5.) Now the same effects precisely were ascribed by the ancient Pagans to their deities as are referred by the Papists to their saints nay, even to the images of those saints ; which latter appears a more rank form of superstition than abounded anciently. A comparison of the inscriptions in Gruter, and other records of antiquity, with those in the churches of Italy and other Romish countries, will place this matter beyond all doubt. These offerings, however, are not confined to the poor, the vulgar, and the ignorant. The gifts and offerings of the wealthy and the noble, in vessels, lamps, statues, and jewellery, rival those of heathen devotees. The altar of St. Thomas a Becket formerly, the shrine of the Virgin Mary at Loretto, and elsewhere., now, and indeed the actual contents of almost every Romish church which has escaped the plunder of the French and Italian revolution, bear ample testimony on this point. The splendour of the Romish shrines has passed into a proverb ; and a woman dressed out in all her finery is, by a well-known French phrase, said to be decked like a shrine (parse comme une Chasse). Now, what is the church of Loretto, but the counterpart of Apollo's temple at Del- phos ? (See Horn. II. 9. 404; see also Liv. 1. 40, 37, as to the temple of .yEsculapius.) There is even a resemblance between the ancient and modern temples in their very fur- niture and appendages, for each have their wardrobes : the changes of dress for a single Romish priest are sufficiently numerous and puzzling, but those of his Holiness (the great high priest of all the modern temples) are almost innume- rable. One part of the treasury of the holy house of Lo- retto consisted of its wardrobes ; and so, as Tertullian ob- serves, the idols of antiquity used to be dressed out in c 2 28 REVIVAL OF THE INQUISITION, [LETTER III. curious robes of the choicest stuffs and fashions. (De Ido- lat. p. 116. edit. Rigalt.) The classical traveller, on being shown at Loretto the great variety of costly habits, some embroidered by queens and princesses, and others bristling with jewels for the use of the miraculous image of our Lady, will at once be reminded of Queen Hecuba of Troy, pros- trating herself before the miraculous image of Pallas, with a present of the best and richest gown of which she was mis- tress, as described by Homer, II. 293. The modern devo- tees of the church of Rome fall not a whit behind those of heathen times ; nor has the pious monarch, mentioned in my last, as having assumed the habit of St. Ignatius, displayed a more remarkable example of attachment to the church of Rome, than a certain sagacious monarch of modern times, who has given undoubted testimony of his piety and gallantry at the same moment, by actually work- ing with his own hands a petticoat for the use of the Virgin Mary ! It is impossible to refer to these " dark places of the earth" without adverting to a remarkable edict of the Spanish Inquisition, dated Madrid, April 5, 1815, entitled, " The Edict of the Most Excellent Lord Inquisitor General, " Don Francisco y Campillo," and which is stated in detail in the introduction to the History of the Jesuits before no- ticed. Under that decree, all those heretics (or Protestants) who did not abjure their religion, and embrace Popery, with- in one year from its date, were rendered amenable to all the terrors of imprisonment, confiscation, and death ; a fact sufficiently characteristic of the implacable hostility of the Romish church, which (to use the language of the author of that history) " has in the very instant of her exaltation " and revival., through the instrumentality of Protestant ex- " ertions, rewarded the Protestant church and cause by the " foulest ingratitude, and the most atrocious persecution/'* If, in spite of the tremendous visitations of Europe, her monarch s are rendered no wiser by their misfortunes, and if the result of all the efforts which have been made in the cause of regal legitimacy, be only to confirm the empire of ignorance, and to consolidate the power of superstition, may LETTER 111.] AND OF THE ORDER OF JESUITS. 29 it not be feared that the exhausted nations of the earth have yet much to endure before the general tranquillity can be permanently secured ? The lavish expenditure of Protes- tant blood and treasure which we have witnessed, has in- deed had the desirable effect of restoring ancient establish- ments to the seats from which they had been hurled by usurpation ; and so far, every friend of law and order must rejoice ; but if in propping, or setting up, ancient govern- ments, we shall find no better reward for our toil than the poor consolation of having deposed a usurper, in favour of a bigot, and obtained a religious, instead of a political dy- nasty, it may be doubted whether the interests of religion, or humanity, will have gained much by the change. The first return which was made by the late Pope for the resto- ration of his power by Protestants, was to restore the order of Jesuits which was originally formed for the avowed ob- ject of opposing the Protestant reformation, and had conti- nued, down to the period of its suppression, the great en- gine of the Romish church in persecuting Protestants : his next step was the express prohibition of the Bible in the vulgar tongue, and its general distribution in any tongue; an act of such direct hostility to the whole Protestant world, and to this nation in particular, that it is only astonishing how, after such a measure, Popery could find defenders among those who bear the name of Protestants. It is under the same auspices that the Inquisition has reared its blood- stained head ; and who that has any proper feeling, either for the religious or civil liberties of mankind, will contend, that England in particular, or the world at large, has any reason for congratulation upon the re-establishment of that odious engine of oppression and wrong ? While such a policy is to prevail (and only such an one will prevail wherever Popery has power) it becomes very problematical whether the influence which England has honourably exerted in establishing rightful authorities, has not unwittingly had an injurious and adverse tendency in enabling a church against whose corruptions she has always protested, to set up her old idolatries, and to establish her ancient empire over 30 PAGAN DEITIES AND PAPAL SAINTS. [LETTER IV. the consciences and persons of men. At all events, this re- mark may not be without its use, in the way of caution against further concessions nearer home. To revert to the more immediate subject of this Letter the Votive Gifts of Popery who can doubt that votive gifts to saints are a pollution of the holy name of God, when he reads " Pol- lute ye my holy name no more with your GIFTS and with your idols?" (Ezek. xx. 33.) LETTER IV. On the Alliance between the Deities of Paganism, and the Saints of Popery. The subject of votive offerings to the deities of pagan- ism, and the saints of popery, naturally involves the conside- ration of THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN THE OBJECTS OF WOR- SHIP IN ONE AND THE OTHER SYSTEM, where a close simi- larity will appear. The Dii Tutelares of the ancient idola- ters, to whom the defence of certain countries was commit- ted, such as Belus among the Babylonians and Assyrians, Osiris and Isis among the Egyptians, and Vulcan among the Lemnians, are rivalled by those tutelary saints of the papacy who are supposed to defend particular nations. There is not a nation where popery is the religion of the state, which is without its patron saint ; but as there is a fashion in most things, and as novelty has peculiar charms, we find our old friends, the French, of late years rather un- ceremoniously deserting their long- tried patron St. Louis, in favour of an illustrious infant ; an event announced to France and the world by the prelate who presided at that infant's funeral, at St. Denis, in the following terms : " Mademoiselle, regenerated by the waters of baptism, is " henceforth the angel of our country; an angel who, LETTER IV.] PAGAN DEITIES AND PAPAL SAINTS. 31 " united in Heaven with the saints of her family, will gain "for herself^ and draw down upon us, the benediction of " the Lord" Thus also the Dii Prcesides of the heathen ido- laters, to whom the protection of certain cities was commit- ted, as Apollo at Delphos, Minerva at Athens, Juno at Carthage, and Quirinus at Rome, are closely copied by the patron saints of the Romish cities, there being hardly one without its saint or good angel, as St. Firmin at Amiens, who walked miraculously with his head in his hand some hours after it had been cut off; or St. Januarius at Naples, whose blood still liquefies when his beloved city is in dan- ger, and the appearance of whose image, or idol, borne by the priests in public processions, never fails to stop the eruption of even so unruly a neighbour as Mount Vesuvius itself. Again, the Dii Patroni of heathenism, whose office was to preside over the temples and altars, as Jupiter in the Capitol, Venus in the temple of Paphos, and Diana in that of Ephesus, are followed by the patron saints of Anti- Christ ; as in England, our Lady of Walsingham, and our Lady of Ipswich once existed, precisely as our Lady of Loretto is now familiar to Italy, or as Diana-Coriphea, Diana-Ephesia, Venus-Cipria, and Venus-Paphia, were once familiar to heathenism ; and thus also, as the sea and land, the fire and air, and other created objects, had an- ciently their deities, as Neptune, Triton, Vulcan, &c., so now these natural objects have their saints, as St. Christo- pher, St. Clement, St. Agatha, he. ; nay, even diseases are honoured by the Papists with special saints as gods for the cure of them, as St. Cornelius for the falling-sickness, and St. Appollin for the tooth-ache, &c., in opposition to the divine declaration " See now that I, even I, am he ; and " there is no God with me ; I kill, and I make alive ; I " wound and I heal ; neither is there any that can deliver " out of my hand." (Deut. xxxii. 39.) Should it be urged in defence of a system which thus robs God of his honour, that the saints are not so properly considered objects of worship, as they are the intercessors between God and man, it may be answered, that the Pagans had thus their Dii Me- 32 PAGAN DEITIES AND PAPAL SAINTS. [LETTER IV. whom they also regarded as intermediate inter- cessors between the Deity and themselves; an error which, although not without its excuse with them, has no apology among those upon whom the light of the gospel has shone, and who are, by such a practice, effectually invalidating and rejecting the revelation of that Divine Personage who is expressly declared, in the scriptures of truth, to be the one and only Mediator between a holy God and his guilty creatures. It is thus also that the rural deities of the ancient Romans have been copied by their successors of the Romish church. These formerly presided over the roads, streets, and high- ways, and were entitled, Viales, Semitales, and Compitales. Sometimes their little temples, or altars, but still more fre- quently their rude statues, appeared in the public ways, and travellers used to step aside and pay their devotions at these rural shrines, and solicit a prosperous journey and safe return. " Invoco vos, Lares viales, ut me bene juvetis." PLAUT. MERC. 5. 2. (See also Apulei Florid. 1.) Now this custom is still common in most popish countries, but especially in Italy, where the old Hecate in triviis is replaced by the Maria in triviis ; and in passing along the road, it is common to see travellers, on their knees, before these rustic altars, which none ever presume to approach without some act of reve- rence, and even those who are most in haste, or who pass at a distance, are sure to cross themselves, and pull off their hats in token of their devotion. In the same way, wooden crosses frequently appear to invite the same genu- flections and prostrations ; and the poor unenlightened pos- tilions would think they deserved to be murdered before the end of their journey, if they should omit the accustomed acts of piety prescribed by their priests, those " blind leaders of the blind." It is evident that all the multiplica- tion of saints which has been noticed in this Letter bears a close affinity to the Polytheism of the heathens, the only * " At ita me Di, Deaeq. superi atque inferi, et Medioximi." Plau- lus Cistellaria, A. 2. s. l. LETTER IV.] PAGAN DEITIES AND PAPAL SAINTS. 33 difference being, that paganism had avowedly many gods, which the Romish faith has also, but without calling them by the same name. The polite but profligate city of Athens was so full of gods, that a witty philosopher ob- served it was easier to find a god there than a man ; and thus the endless profusion of saints in the Romish church has followed close upon antiquity, all of which saints not only worked miracles while they lived, (or they could not have been admitted as saints by the Romish church,) but their very relics, pictures, and statues, work miracles now they are dead, while they themselves are expressly made the objects of prayer, which no created being can be, with- out gross idolatry in the worshipper. * 6 Sancte Ursula, ora pro nobis:" What is this but first to pray to a saint to pray to God for the devotee ? Indeed, every where through Italy we see their sacred inscriptions breathing the pure spirit of Paganism, and ascribing the same powers, characters, and attributes to their saints, as were formerly ascribed to the heathen gods, as the few following specimens will evince : PAGAN INSCRIPTIONS. Mercuric et Minervae Diis Tutelarib. Dii Qui Huic templo Praesident. Numini. Mercurii Sacr. Herculi. Victori. Pollenti. Potenti. Invicto. Praestiti Jovi S. Diis. Deabus Que. Cum. Jove.* * Gruter Corp. Inscript. p. 50. It.Cic. Or. pro Lege Man. 15. It. Grut. p. 54. It. p. 50. It. p. 22. It. ib.p. 2. POPISH INSCRIPTIONS. Maria et Francisce Tutelares mei. Divo Eustorgio Qui Huic templo Praesidet. Numini. Divi Georgii Pollentis. Potentis. Invicti. Divis Praestitibus Juvantibus. Georgio, Stephanoque Cum Deo opt. Max.* * Vid. Boldonii Epigraphica, p. 439. It. p. 348. It. p. 422. It. p. 649. PAGAN DEIFICATION, &C. | LETTER V. LETTER V. On the Conformity between Heathen Deification, and Romish Canonization. THE observation in the conclusion of the last letter respecting the miracles which it is necessary for the saints in the church of Rome to have worked, before they can be canonized, or beatified, suggest the propriety of noticing THE CONFORMITY BETWEEN HEATHEN DEIFICATION AND ROMISH CANONIZATION. The ancient priests, in order to the credit of their system, felt it necessary to persuade the people, that certain characters, many of whom had, how- ever, been the most ambitious and sensual of mankind, were honoured by the especial favour of Heaven ; were deep in its mysteries- and even worthy of being placed among the gods themselves ; in consequence of which, their public deification took place, with all " the pomp and circum- " stance" so well calculated to impose upon a gross and ido- latrous people. In order, however, to this ceremony, some miraculous intimation of the favour and will of Heaven as to the individual in question was necessary, which was duly attested, as essential to the ceremony. Thus, in the case of Romulus, one Julius Proculus took a solemn oath, 6 ' That Romulus himself appeared to him, and ordered him " to inform the senate of his being called up to the assem- " bly of the gods, under the name of Quirinus," (Pint, in Vit. Rom. Dyonis. Halicar. 1. 2. p. 124,) and in the dei- fication of the Caesars (some of whom were little less than monsters) the established proof of their divinity was an eagle flying out of the funeral pile towards heaven, which was supposed to convey the soul of the deceased, and was also required to be duly attested. (Dio Cass. p. 598, 842.) The Papists, in imitation of this Pagan original, consider it necessary to their credit, to canonize or beatifv certain LETTER V.] SAINTS OF MODKltN POPERY. 35 individuals of their communion ; (some of whom have, like their heathen prototypes, been of infamous and scandalous lives;) and in order to this act, they also introduce the machinery of miracles, although with some difference as to the mode of its operation. In this case, the miracles are alleged to have been performed by the saints themselves, and there is as little difficulty in procuring the necessary attestations in modern, as in ancient Rome. The creation of saints has in consequence become almost as common as that of cardinals, there having rarely been a Pope who did not enrich the calendar with some fresh specimens. Bene- dict 13th canonized eight in one summer, and his suc- cessor, Clement 12th, four more. Innocent 13th, who suc- ceeded him, beatified Andrew Conti, a member of his own family : and this is another main source of saintship when, to gratify the ambition of the reigning Pope, this honour is conferred on some of his name or family. The late Pope canonized five saints, all of whose banners are at this mo- ment waving in a chapel of St. Peter's. The Papists con- sider this rite as so essential a part of their religion, that they have even perverted the sacred scriptures, for the pur- pose of giving sanction to the practice, having translated the passage of St. James, v. 11, not as it ought to be: " Behold how we count them happy which endure," but " Behold how we beatify those who have suffered with con- " stancy ;" in like manner as, in order to give a sanction to their religious processions with the host and with relics, &c. they translate the passage in Heb. xi. 30 " The walls " of Jericho fell down after they were compassed about " seven days," " after a procession of seven days." And as they render the 21st verse of that chapter, instead of " Jacob worshipped, leaning upon the top of his staff," " Jacob worshipped the top of his staif ;" which the learned rabbins of the church of Rome explain by supposing some visible representation, worthy of divine worship, to have been on the staff, in order to justify their own worship of almost any thing, and every thing, except the proper object of adoration. It costs an immense sum to be made a saint, 36 PAGAN AND PAPAL IMAGE WORSHIP. [LETTER VI. but pious relatives are sometimes content to bear it. Proof of the miracles wrought by the deceased must be adduced in due form, in a judicial way. Witnesses are examined, and, in order that full justice may be done, counsel are ap- pointed on both sides; one undertaking to establish the miracles, and the other opposing them ; and thus the mat- ter is solemnly argued " dans les formes, et selon les regies" and not determined, until after a long and expen- sive process. It is further remarkable, that some miracle must have been performed by the deceased after his death, as well as during life; one of these by the way, being quite as easy to the saint as the other, and each being equally capable of proof. It is unnecessary to observe, that these judicial inquiries invariably terminate in favour of the saint and his family ; since the Pope and his council are equally interested in the successful issue of the suit : indeed, as an atheistical Pope once observed" What a profitable fable is that of Jesus Christ to us !" LETTER VI. On the Alliance between the Image Worship of Heathenism and of Popery. I WOULD next consider, somewhat more particularly, THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN THE IMAGE WO11SHIP OF HEA- THENISM AND THAT OF POPERY. Plato informs us, that there were images in the temples of Egypt, from the earliest antiquity. (Plat, de Legib. 1. ii. p. 656. Max. Tyr. Diss. 38.) It appears evidently from Scripture, that they subsisted there as well as in Palestine, before the time of Moses; indeed, they owed their early introduction to the original apostasy of man, who no sooner departed from " the living God/ 1 than he displayed the depravity of his LETTER VI.] USE OF IMAGES IS IDOLATRY. 37 nature, by " honouring and worshipping the creature, "more than the Creator;" by bowing down before them that were no gods, but the work of men's hands, wood and stone ; that had eyes and saw not, ears and heard f not, neither was there any breath in their nostrils. The natural reason of every man, when not perverted and debased by sin ; and the plain testimony of his conscience, when not under a similar delusion, manifested sufficiently the folly and impiety of such conduct ; but to leave him altogether without excuse, the written law of God was superadded to the common law of nature. By the law proclaimed at Sinai, the Almighty was revealed as the sole object of divine worship, and as a God jealous of his honour : man was expressly prohibited from making to himself " any " graven image, or any likeness of any thing in heaven " above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under " the earth," and from " bowing down himself to them, or u serving them." (Exod. xx. 4, 5,) This law, equally obli- gatory on Jew and Gentile, was never relaxed in any degree ; and the peculiar test of true religion, which the rigid observance of the second commandment formed throughout the whole Jewish economy, is the strongest proof of the abhorrence in which idolatrous representations of every kind were held by the divine Lawgiver, Whatever was permitted to the Israelites, in condescension to their particular situation and circumstances, there was ever a stand made against the use of images, under whatever pre- text ; as a custom the most dangerous to the first principles of vital religion, as tending naturally to corrupt it, and as necessarily introducing superstition and idolatry into the worship and service of God. In this particular, the Al- mighty, speaking after the manner of men, in condescension to our infirmities, was pleased to declare himself A JEALOUS GOD ; not only abhorring in his people the spiritual adultery of gross idolatry, but jealous and indignant at the exhibition of that sister evil which the use of images in- volved : in like manner as an earthly husband would not only expect his wife to abstain from actual crime, but would 38 USE OF IMAGES IS IDOLATRY. [BETTER VI. find his jealousy excited, and his indignation kindled, by her showing those attentions to another, to which he alone possessed the just and rightful claim. The use of images and pictures in the Christian church did not begin till the fourth century, when corruption in religion had everywhere shown itself. The Protestant his- torian, Dean Milner, mentions the zeal of Epiphanius, Bishop of Cyprus, in that century, " in tearing a painted " curtain which he saw in a place of public worship ; " which seems 11 (says the historian) " at once a proof of " his detestation of pictures and images in religion, and " also of the weak beginnings of that superstition in the " fourth century." (See Hist, of Church of Christ, vol. ii. p. 300.) The same ecclesiastical historian also furnishes a sufficient refutation of the stale defence which has been always made of images or idols, and which defence will no doubt be repeated again I mean the plea that such things are only used to raise the mind of the worshipper to the Beings whom they represent. After noticing a letter of that arrogant and worldly-minded pontiff, Gregory III. written in the eighth century to the emperor, which contains this precise defence of images or idols, he observes, " A " pagan philosopher would have defended heathen idolatry " much in the same manner; and the dependence which u both the pagan and the papist place on the image, de- " monstrates that they imagine the power of the saint or " daemon to be intimately connected with the image which " represents, as it were, the body, of which the object of " their worship is the soul; so justly do the Scriptures " describe idolaters as literally worshipping the works of " their own hands, and the man of sin as worshipping " daemons. (1 Tim. iv.) Sophistry may evade, but it " cannot confute. When men cease to ' hold the head,' " and to be satisfied with Christ as their all, they fall " into these and similar errors. The heart which feels " not the want of the living God, as its proper nutriment, " will feed on the ashes of idolatry." (Vol. iii. 375.) The Christian emperors were so convinced of the con- LETTER VI.] FIRST CHRISTIANS ABHORRED IMAGES. 39 nexion subsisting between images, and the worship of them, that they strictly prohibited their pagan subjects, on pain of death, from lighting up candles, offering incense, or hanging up garlands to images, which external acts were then considered by the whole Christian church as flagrant proofs of genuine paganism. (Vide Gothof. Comment, de statu Pagan, sub Christian. Imperatorib. leg. vi. p. 7.) They considered these images as senseless idols, the work of men's hands, and therefore unworthy of any honour; and all the instances and overt acts of such worship, as condemned by the law of Theodosius, are exactly the same with what the papists practise at this day ; viz. lighting up candles, burning incense, and hanging up boughs and garlands. These laws even confiscated the house or land where any such acts of heathen superstition had been com- mitted. (Ibid. leg. xii. p. 15.) The Christian emperors, who no doubt acted under the advice of their bishops, did not think that paganism was abolished, as indeed it was not, until the use of images was utterly extirpated, this being always reckoned the chief of those heathen rites, which, in conformity with the sense of the purest ages of Christianity, are never mentioned in the imperial laws, without the epithets of " profane," " damnable," " impious," &c. (Ibid. leg. xvii. 20,) while the worshippers of such images are invariably considered by the primitive Fathers as heathens and pagans. (Pamphili Apol. pro. Orig. vid. Hieron. Op. torn. v. 233. Ed. Par.) What opinion then can be entertained of the Church of Rome, but that by a change only of the name, she has found means to retain the thing ; and by substituting her saints in the place of the old deities, has set up idols of her own, instead of those of her forefathers ? The professors of that corrupt re- ligion have now the effrontery to make that the principal part of Christian worship which the primitive Christians regarded as the worst part of paganism, and they even ex- tract the most profitable revenue from a practice which, in the first ages of Christianity, would have cost a man both his life and estate. 40 PAGAN, ALTERED TO PAPAL, IDOLS. [LETTER VI. The noblest heathen temple now extant is the Pantheon at Rome, which, as the inscription over the portico in- forms us, " having been impiously dedicated of old by " Agrippa to Jupiter and all the Gods, was piously con- " secrated by Pope Boniface the Fourth, to the blessed u Virgin and all the Saints." With this single alteration, it serves as exactly for all the purposes of the popish, as it did for the pagan worship, for which it was built : for as in the old pagan temple, every one might find the God of his country, and address himself to that deity to whose religion he was most devoted ; so it is precisely, at this moment : every one chooses the patron saint whom he prefers, and the spectator may here behold different ser- vices going on at the same time, at different altars, with distinct congregations around them, just as the fancy and inclination of the different worshippers incline them to one or the other particular saint. It is difficult to say what better title the modern saints can show to the adoration now paid to them, than the old deities whose shrines they have usurped : for the religion of Christianity is as silent about the merits of the many thousand Romish saints as about those of pagan antiquity, and has no more pre- scribed divine honours to be paid to the one than to the other ; nor is it easy to show how it can be less criminal to bow down before the images erected by the popes than to those which Agrippa or Nebuchadnezzar set up : the fables and falsehoods upon which such honours are claimed for the saints of popery, the greater part of whom were any thing else than saints while they lived, are of a nature to outrage all credibility, and to disgust every man who has not resolved to deliver up his reason, bound hand and foot to the high priests of popery, and to swallow the most monstrous and revolting absurdities, in obedience to their commands. As it is in the Pantheon, so it is in many other heathen temples which yet remain in Rome, where they have only pulled down one idol to set up another ; and changed rather the name, than the object, of their worship. Of this, a variety of instances might be given ; LETTER VI.] PAGAN, ALTERED TO PAPAL, IDOLS. 41 but the most remarkable is that of the Temple of Romulus, built on the spot where he was supposed to be suckled by the wolf; and from which circumstance, the heathens re- garded Romulus (after they had made him a god) as sin- gularly propitious to the health and safety of young chil- dren, from which notion it became a practice for nurses, and mothers, to present their sickly infants before his shrine, in this temple, in confidence of a cure or relief. Now, when this temple was afterwards converted into a church, lest any piece of superstition should be lost, or the good Christians of modern Rome think themselves in- jured by the change, in losing such a protector for their children, care was taken to find out, in the place of the heathen god, a Christian saint, who had also been ex- posed in his infancy, and found by chance like Romulus, and so might be presumed to be quite as fond of children as their old deity. The worship of Romulus was there- fore transferred to St. Theodorus: and children are pre- sented at his shrine by their mothers and nurses, who sit with silent reverence before the altar of the saint, waiting for his miraculous influence on the health of the. infant. (Rom. Modern. Giorn. T 2da. c. 35. Rione di Ripa.) It is common, in these temples, to find the shrine of some ancient hero, filled by the meaner statue of some modern saint : while, in other instances, they have not even given themselves the trouble to make this change, but have been content to take up with the old image just as they found it, after baptizing or consecrating it anew, by the imposi- tion of a Christian name; as in the church of St. Agnes, the antique statue of a young Bacchus, with a little change of drapery, was afterwards worshipped under the title of that female saint. The famous statue of St. Peter, in his cathedral at Rome, is seated in a chair, and he holds a key in his hand the well-known position of Jupiter; who however held a thunder-bolt. The history of this statue is rather curious: there were formerly two statues of Jupiter Capitolinus, one of stone, and the other of bronze. When Christianity succeeded to Heathenism, they put St. 42 IMAGES PROVED TO BE ADOKED. [LETTER VII. Peter's head on the body of the stone statue, and gave him a pair of new hands, in one of which they placed a key ; they then melted the bronze of the other statue of Jupiter, and recast it, after the fashion of the stone one, as altered ; and so, as Horace says, " Mutato nomine, de te, fabula " narratur." In plain English the worship went on quite as well to the modern apostle, as it had done to the ancient thunderer. In either case, the true God was neg- lected and forgotten, and an image was set up in his place, " which had eyes and saw not, and which had ears and " heard not, neither was there any breath in its nostrils." LETTER VII. A Refutation of the Papists' Assertion that Images are not Worshipped, but only used as Aids to Devotion. IN pursuing the subject of THE IDOLATRY OF IMAGES, it is necessary to notice the denial of the papists, that they worship their images as gods, or believe that any divine power resides in them ; and also their assertion, that they only employ these external memorials, as aids to the mind in devotion, and extending no further than may lead them to desire the prayers of those whom they represent. 1st. As to the belief of a divine power residing in the image, their celebrated writer Durant says, " There can be no " doubt but that the images of our saints often work " signal miracles, by procuring health to the infirm, and " appearing to us often in dreams, to suggest something " of great moment for our service." (De Ritib. 1. i. c. 5.) Thus their votive inscriptions ascribe the power of healing diseases to their saints, as especially the following at Milan ; "Divae Savinae Livia Euphemia in acerbo stomachi cru- LETTER VII.] MIRACLES ASCRIBED TO IMAGES. 43 " ciatu opem nacta," precisely as the heathen inscriptions ascribe the same power to their deities. (See Gruter, pp. 48, 65.) There is a prayer in the Romish books of offices ordered by the rubric to be addressed to the sacred and miraculous picture of St. Veronica, couched in the follow- ing terms: " Conduct us, O thou blessed figure, to our " proper home, where we may behold the pure face of Christ." (See Conform, of Ancient and Modern Ceremonies, p. 158.) The miraculous images in every great town of Italy are erected into proper objects of divine worship by the blas- phemous narrations which are reported of their divine power; their books testifying, their priests asserting, and their people believing, that several of these images have the power of locomotion, and have actually transported themselves from one place to another ; have shed tears, and even blood ; have spoken with audible voices, and wrought miracles ; all which necessarily implies a power nothing short of Divine. The image of Loretto is fully believed to have been trans- ported over vast oceans, and immense tracts of land, while the shops in Loretto are filled with crucifixes, Agnus Deis, and other popish trinkets, all accompanied by certificates of their having been touched by the holy image ; thus evincing the general persuasion and belief, that some virtue is com- municated by that touch, from a power residing in the image. In a church at Lucca is the image of the Virgin and Child ; of which it is related, that an infidel threw a stone at the infant, but the Virgin, to save him from the blow, shifted him from one arm to the other, while the reprobate was swallowed up, and the hole is shown just before the altar of the image, enclosed by a grate ; the Vir- gin received the blow on her shoulder, whence the blood issued, which is preserved in a bottle, and shown with the greatest ceremony, by the priest in his vestments, with tapers lighted, while all embrace the sacred relic on their knees. Vide Wright"* s Travels at Lucca. Now what is this, but to attest the existence of an actual power in this idolatrous image, to defend itself from injury, and to avenge insult ? The image or picture of St, Dominic of Surriano D 2 44 MIRACLES ASCRIBED TO IMAGES. [LETTER VII. is declared by their histories to have been brought down from heaven by the Virgin Mary, in person, and two other saints ; and they affirm that, before this picture " great '' numbers of the dead have been restored to life, and hun- u dreds from the agonies of death the dumb, the blind, " the deaf, the lame, have been cured, and all diseases, and " mortal wounds miraculously healed.*'' All which is at- tested by public notaries, and confirmed by cardinals, bi- shops, generals, and priors of that order ; and all this is so generally believed, that from the 9th of July to the 9th of August (his anniversary festival) there have been counted above 100,000 pilgrims, (many of the highest quality,) who came from all parts of Europe to pay their devotions, and make their offerings, to this picture. La Vie de St. Dominic, p. 599 and 602, edit. Paris. Is not this to in- sist on a divine ower in this image or idol, which could have warranted the devotions of these worshippers ? Aringhus says, " the images of the blessed Virgin shine " out continually by new and daily miracles, to the joy of " their votaries, and the confusion of opponents." And speaking of this picture, he says, " it is a most solid bul- " wark of the church of Christ, and a noble monument of " the pure faith of Christians against all the impious op- " ponents of image worship. It has more than once re- " moved itself from one place to another. The worship, " therefore, of this picture is become so famous through " all Christendom, that multitudes, to the number of "100,000 and upwards, resort annually to pay their de- " votions to it ; and not only the original picture (made " not by human but by heavenly hands) is celebrated for " its daily miracles, but even the copy of it at St. Mary's " Monastery is famous for its perpetual signs and wonders of a young woman, a Protestant, who had been married in the beginning of the preceding Lent, and on the her marriage became suddenly delirious, and declared a multitude of infernal spirits surrounded her, with whom she must go, and she threatened self-destruction : this had lasted for two months, when her medical attendant de- clared, that in all probability she could not survive twenty- four hours. The clergyman of the parish was accordingly called in. but finding the case past his art, he departed : at length, however, a Catholic woman made a tender of her services, which were accepted, when lo, she procured some holy water, with which she made the sign of a cross upon the patient's forehead, who declared she was scalded, but forthwith fell into a gentle sleep. On awaking, the Catholic put holy water into her mouth, on which she said her throat was scalded, but in a few minutes, fell into a comfortable sleep for some hours. Next morning more holy water was applied, which gave ease, and from that time the danger of death decreased. She then enjoyed (the writer says) lucid intervals, and invariably after the application of holy water fell into a slumber. (Perhaps the gentle reader will think that she was not the first who has been sent to sleep, again and again, by holy water.) It is, however, time that the exorcist himself should now make his appearance. He did not, it seems, attend on the first application : at length, however, on Tuesday in Rogation week, he set out, a spe- cial messenger having stated that the patient was in a worse condition than ever. (" Nee Deus intersit nisi dignus vindice nodus.") It was, he says, the most awful visit he ever made ; for during his walk of six miles, and while he re- mained, it thundered incessantly. She required two persons to keep her in bed, before he entered, but though she could not see him, she then required three, and (still without see- ing him) said, she knew who he was, and gradually revived. He then explained some of the articles of the Romish faith, and assured her that she must believe the holy Catholic church, before she could obtain relief; which she at once declared she did, and had done from the moment she knew 98 EFFECTS OF HOLY WATER, &C. [LETTER XVII. what holy water was, and experienced its effects. She then pronounced a long panegyric on it ; said she was not deliri- ous, but knew and remembered all that had passed ; upon which he dipped his finger into the holy water, and made the sign of the cross on her forehead, which she again de- clared scalded her. The Lord's Prayer was then repeated ; but when the patient came to the petitions, she fell into con- vulsions, and could hardly articulate ; after which the ex- orcisms began, through the whole of which, every limb and joint was agitated and convulsed, and " it required," says the reverend gentleman, " constant attention to keep her covered ;" in the mean time, he adds, " the lightning was " flashing, and the thunder rolling, and I, with an impera- " tive voice, commanding the evil spirit to reply to my in- " terrogatories, and to go forth from her." No wonder that, under such circumstances, his flesh should creep, and his hair stand on end, as he then assures us was the case. However, the whole being duly concluded, the patient be- came calm, and in a few minutes conversed with the same ease as before ! She was then baptized into the Romish church ; and the exorcist says, he repeated several acts of contrition, during which, he says, she trembled like a leaf, and again said, the holy water gave her as much pain as boiling water. Immediately after the ceremony, she con- versed with all the cheerfulness of a person in perfect health and spirits, took her tea, was next day down stairs per- fectly well, and has been so ever since. The reverend gen- tleman then proceeds to designate the Protestant religion as " a sect," and dilates on the surprising efficacy of what he terms " mere salt and water blessed by a Catholic priest." He then adverts to " the super-enlightened men of the age," as likely to turn away from such a story, as beneath their notice ; nor indeed does any very superior degree of light appear necessary to produce such a consequence. In an Appendix he states, that having visited his patient up- wards of a year afterwards, she told him that she knew nothing at all about the Catholic religion, but was con- vinced that it was the truth, and would acquire a know- LETTER XVIII.] PAPAL FRAUD, &C. 99 ledge of it, as soon as possible ; upon which, he promised to send her books of instruction, and left with her two copies of the account of her own exorcism I presume, in order to her more speedy conversion ; and he sums up the whole by a solemn declaration, that the ministers of his own church have inherited the powers granted by Christ to his apostles!! It is important to observe, that this miracle of Mr. Peach is highly extolled by the Roman Catholics of England, and was recorded with admiration by the editors of two monthly Popish journals published in this Protestant metropolis ! ! ! Qui vult decipi decipiatur. LETTER XVIII. The Agreement between Heathen and Romish Exorcism further considered, with a Refutation of the pretended Continuance of this and other Miracles in the Church of Rome. IN the foregoing relation of casting out a devil by a modern priest of the church of Rome, we observe a very convenient and summary mode adopted by him of getting over the objections which Scripture and reason, alike, pre- sent against continued miracles that is, to brand all who do not believe them as infidels. This is the old artifice of the Romish church as to t ran substantiation, purgatory, the Church's infallibility, the saving nature of their seven sacra- ments, and so forth ; in all these cases, as in that of mira- cles, if a man will not take the testimony of tradition, or rather of the priesthood, he is an infidel and a heretic, and so they consider there is an end of the argument ; but the fact is, it is such monstrous corruptions of truth as these, which make infidels ; it is when the fair form of a scrip- tural faith comes to be tricked out in such false and mere- 100 PRETENSIONS TO MIRACLES REFUTED. [LETTER XVIII. tricious frippery, that many persons of good sense in the Roman Catholic church, conceive disgust, and are repelled, even at the threshold of such a creed, from proceeding to examine, and embrace it. That which is only above reason, but without being repugnant to it, such as is the religion of the Gospel, has found humble and honest believers, even in the strongest, and most cultivated minds : what has been both below reason, and contrary to it, as are so many doctrinal errors of the Romish church, has doubtless driven multitudes, in every age and na- tion, into the darkness and wickedness of athekm, or de- ism, as a refuge from such a religion as that of popery ; while such as have chosen to take their religion upon trust, and to believe all that a corrupt church has pre- scribed, have rested, like the Jews of old, in the false security of external forms, and been any thing else than the spiritual worshippers required by that Gospel which declares, that " except a man be born again, he cannot " enter into the kingdom of God" a birth, not merely by the baptism of water into a visible church, but by the baptism of the Spirit also, into an invisible church. To such formalists, the reproof of our Lord to the Jews, applies with equal force : " In vain do they worship me, u teaching for doctrines, the commandments of men." With regard to the reverend writer's declaration, that if our Saviour were to appear again on earth, his miracles would make no impression on certain persons if he mean to include in this sweeping clause, the Protestant church, which he afterwards terms " a sect," he may be briefly an- swered, that it is simply because the miracles of our Lord do make an impression on members of that church, that they refuse to believe in all the forgeries and falsehoods which have been since attempted to be added to them. The two main fallacies of the Birmingham high priest, as of his church, are 1st, his erroneous interpretation of Scripture, by which he would prove that our Lord's gift of miracles to his first followers descended in succession to the end of the world, and that such succession is only in the LETTER XVIII.] PRETENSIONS TO MIRACLES REFUTED. 101 Romish priesthood ; and, 2ndly, that, among other splen- did miracles, this of casting out devils is a certain proof of Divine doctrine. As to the first error, this is just as rea- sonable a notion as that the gift of tongues was to continue in the church, and can be as easily proved : " All those u acts," says Bishop Hall, " which proceeded from super- " natural privilege, ceased with their cause : who now " dare undertake to continue them, unless bold papists, " who have brought in gross magic, instead of miraculous " authority?" (See his Letter to the Bishop of Worcester.) And again, " Why should any in these latter times chal- " lenge a right of succession in one miracle, and not claim " it in another ? All these were given with one and the " same breath, continueoj by the same power, and called in, " and stinted, by the same Providence, with their fellow " miracles." (Invis. World, B. iii. s. 9.) The limiting of the performance of these wonders to the Romish priesthood, was an admirable expedient for keeping the lower world in awe, and subjecting all mankind to the dominion of an ecclesiastical tyranny. 2nd. If the Romish church could even succeed in proving that the miracle of casting out devils were now in her hands, (which she never can,) she would be no nearer to the proof of her own infallibility, or perfection. The magicians of Egypt certainly did some wonders ; but they were still false prophets, while Moses was the true. The corrupt Jews had their exor- cists, as Christ plainly intimates " If I by Beelzebub " cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them " out?" We read also, in the Acts, of " vagabond Jews," who were " exorcists ;" and Josephus relates, (Antiq. 1. viii. c. 2,) that he saw the Jew Eleazer casting out devils by the help of a magical ring, in the presence of Vespasian and his army. Thus also the disciples told their Lord, that they had seen one " casting out devils in his name, who " followed not with them."" So far is such a testimony (even if its present existence could be proved) from afford- ing a criterion of a true church, that the same gift to Judas did not prove him a true disciple, but still left him 102 MIRACLESNOT INFALLIBLE TESTS OFTRUTH. [LET. XVIII. a false one. Well, therefore, might our Lord say, " In " this, rejoice not, that the spirits are subject to you, but " rather rejoice because your names are written in heaven." Gifts and graces are very distinct things. Moses assigns an infallible test by which the truth of a creed or doctrine may be tried, viz. whether the party working a miracle in its favour, enforces the worship of the true God, or not. If not, his miracle is fallacious, and his condemnation cer- tain. (See Deut. xiii. 1. 5.) Thus our Lord foretold of false Christs, and false prophets, whose signs and wonders should even be great, and the ancient prophet points out the only proper test of miraculous pretensions. " To the " law and to the testimony, if they" (the performers of miracles,) " speak not according to this word, it is because " there is no light in them." (Is. viii. 20.) The true and golden rule in this matter is furnished by Justin Martyr : " How shall it be known that our miracles are better than " the heathen's?" the answer to which is, "By the faith " and worship of the true God" in adverting to which, Bishop Hall observes, u Miracles must be judged by the " doctrine they confirm ; not the doctrine, by the miracles. 16 The dreamer or prophet must be esteemed, not by the " event of his wonder, but by the substance and scope of " his teaching. The Romanists argue preposterously while " they would prove the truth of their church by miracles ; " whereas they should prove their miracles by the truth. u For example : That power cannot know the prayer, "which knows not the heart: either then the Virgin is 4t God, for that she knows the heart; or to know the heart, " and so our prayers, is falsely ascribed to the Virgin ; and " therefore the miracles which teach men thus to honour " her, are teachers of lies, and so, not of God. If the " practice of worshipping the Virgin be bad, God deliver " me from the immediate author of these miracles. Change " but one idol for another, and what differ the wonders of " Apollo's Temples from those of Romish Chapels." (Epistles.) The sentiment of St. Chrysostom is important to show LETTER XVIII.] BISHOP MILNER^S MODERN MIRACLE. 103 that modern pretensions to miraculous powers will no more prove the church of Rome a true church, than the want of those powers will prove the church of England a false church. " Once" (says he) " it was known by miracles " who were true Christians, and who were false : but now " the power of working miracles is wholly taken away " the pretence of it is to be found amongst those who pre- " tend to be Christians :" with this, agrees the opinion of Augustine, who observes, " against those miracle-mongers^ " God has put me upon my guard, by admonishing me " that in the last days, there shall arise false prophets who " shall work such signs and wonders as to deceive, if pos- " sible, the very elect." And in like manner Calvin re- marks " To demand miracles of us is highly wrong; " for we have not been the inventors of a new gospel, but " we retain that very gospel which has for its confirmation " all the miracles which Christ and his apostles have " wrought," I would here observe, that a Romish bishop (as well as a Romish priest) has also ventured to put the credulity of some persons, and the patience of others, to the test by publishing in this Protestant nation an account of another miracle performed at a holy well in Staffordshire, and at- tested by himself, as if to try how far the public mind would endure the exhibition of so much absurdity, and no doubt as a prelude to future experiments upon their com- mon sense and their forbearance. See " Authentic Docu- " ments relative to the miraculous Cure of Winifred White, at St. Winifred's Well, by the Right Rev. John "Milner, D.D. Vicar Apostolic." I conclude by observing, that a man who chooses to take his religion from the Holy Scriptures may believe all things necessary to his salvation, without being an infidel, although he does not believe that the priests of the Church of Rome can cast out devils, raise the dead, heal the sick, speak with divers tongues, change common water into holy, or convert the material elements of bread and wine into the actual body and blood of our adorable Lord. Further, that so 104 FORGED MIRACLES, &C. [LETTER XVIII. far from its being capable of proof that all, or any, of these miracles have been performed since the Apostolic age, the gross artifices and foul falsehoods of which the Church of Rome has been openly convicted, in innumerable instances, when attempting to palm such miracles upon the world, in support of her own pretensions, afford the best proof of the apostasy and corruption of a church which could conde- scend to stoop to such base and unhallowed expedients ; that it is to the endless additions which have been made to the simplicity of the gospel of Christ by the craft of de- signing men, that such characters must refer the greatest portion of the infidelity which has been found amongst men ; that it is to their suppression of the Bible, that they must ascribe the awful ignorance which has prevailed in the world; and to their Pagan principles, and pliant morals, that they must attribute the actual portion of vice and im- morality which have been ever found in connexion with their own, and every other, system of darkness and error. Finally, if the pretended workers of such miracles as these, claiming as they do to be the true successors of the apostles, do not come under the description and condemna- tion of the apostle in 2 Corinthians, ch. xi. ver. 13, 14, 15, language should seem to have lost its meaning.* * It would seem as if some of the laity of the Romish church in Ireland were at length disgusted and wearied with the spiritual yoke of a profligate and venal priesthood. In a meeting at Cavan (Thomas M'Cabe, Esq. in the chair) of a large assembly of Catholic Laymen, Dr. McDonald stated (without contradiction) that " notorious and fla- " grant abuses had long existed" that " scandalous lives rendered " men unfit for the ministry of the Gospel" that " a superstition of " the most monstrous and detestable description, which would have " dishonoured and disgraced the most barbarous ages, had taken firm u root" that " the exclusive right of working miracles was now laid claim 11 to by men of the most infamous and profligate characters, who are " not only a dishonour to religion, but a disgrace to human nature ; " some of whom are so far gone in folly as well as depravity, as to " make religion pander to their avarice and profligacy" and he de- clared there were then present the most respectable persons ready to attest the truth of his assertion. The speaker roundly asserted that " it is in vain to look for reformation from any exertion of the clergy." LET. XIX.] PAGAN AND PAPAL PECUNIARY EXPIATIONS. 105 LETTER XIX. On the Analogous Nature of the Expiation of Sin by Money, in the Heathen and Romish Churches and the Analogy between other Pagan and Papal Atonements for Sin the Conformity between the Stories of the Pagan Deities, and the Romish Saints between the Ancient and Modern Idolatry in producing actual Vice between Abstinence from Food in the two Systems and between the supreme Power of the respective Priest- hoods. THE ANALOGY BETWEEN THE HEATHEN AND ROMISH METHODS OF EXPIATING OFFENCES BY MONEY, OR BY ITS WORTH, may be next considered. The tax-book of the Romish Chancery presents the following bead-roll of crimes, and their pecuniary commutations : s. d. For procuring abortion . . .076 For simony . . . . 10 6 For sacrilege 10 6 For perjury in a criminal case . .090 For robbery 0120 *For burning a neighbour's house . .0120 This meeting produced a great sensation in Ireland, and may perhaps be the occasion finally of driving the idolatrous priests of Baal, not only out of the diocese of Kilmore, but out of a country which has too long groaned under the tyranny of these modern Popes ; whose igno- rance and vice would furnish, at this moment, details as awful and dis- gusting as those which are recorded of the period immediately pre- ceding our own Reformation in England. * A horrid trial occurred on occasion of the house of one Lynch hav- ing been burnt in Ireland by Devan, the clerk of the Romish chapel near it, who mustered the conspirators in that building, when eight H 106 PAGAN AND PAPAL ATONEMENTS FOR SIN. [LET. XIX. For defiling a virgin . . . .090 For incest with the nearest relatives .076 For murdering a layman . . .076 For keeping a concubine . . . 10 6 For laying violent hands on a clergyman 10 6 For forging letters apostolical . .170 I dare not add to the above list certain other offences which are not calculated to meet the public eye ; but I ask, what are these sums levied by the court of Rome on the commis- sion of particular sins, but so many licenses to commit them ? and what is such a taxation but an ecclesiastical encourage- ment by the Pope, and his agents, for the commission of crimes for which absolution can be afterwards purchased, at as easy a rate as the license itself? The idolatry of India presents, in its native code, the fol- lowing scale for scandalous expressions : One of equal rank with the accused, shall be fined 2/. ; an inferior 41. ; a superior M. For absolution of the crime of perjury, the offender shall perform worship to the goddess Jershuttee. False testimony may be given to preserve life, but if a man have murdered a Brahmin, he shall be punished by not being allowed to give false witness to save life. The crime of adultery may be committed for about Is. Procuring the death of an innocent person, about I/. Where a man is ca- pitally convicted, he shall pay 1 50/. to escape death ; half that sum when his sentence is dismemberment; and afourth when it is banishment. Much more might be added, but human beings, among whom were some unoffending children, perished in the flames ; one of the witnesses on which trial deposed, that he " swore " on his knees to aid and assist the Catholics ; never to deal with a " Protestant, if he could get what he wanted from a Catholic, and to " assist the cause with person and pocket" Is it too much to suppose that the absolution of the Romish church stood these offenders in stead, now that the Taxaiio camera apostolica is no longer in force ; and that the certainty that pardon might be obtained on confession, if it did not present an actual inducement to the commission of such an atrocious outrage, must at least have facilitated its commission by removing some of those terrors which a sense of future responsibility rarely fails to excite ? LET. XIX.] PAGAN AND PAPAL PENITENCE EXTERNAL. 107 the short remark of Mr. Grant may suffice : "" Immorali- 44 ties of every description are tolerated on easy terms to " one part of society, and some of the most atrocious crimes " have all the encouragement which a legal sanction can 44 give them." (See Mr. Grant's work on India, p. 58.) THE ANALOGY BETWEEN PAGAN AND PAPAL ATONE- MENTS FOR SIN AS SO MANY ENCOURAGEMENTS TO SIN, may be next adverted to. Mr. Granfs book on India lying before me, I proceed to adduce instances to this point from modern heathenism, although the whole religion of ancient idolatry was one continued round of external expiation for sin. " The Hindoos, 1 ' says Mr. Grant, " are taught to 44 have recourse to various ceremonial works and observ- " ances, and confidently to depend on these for absolution ; 66 real contrition and amendment, hatred of evil, and a re- 44 spect to the holiness of the divine nature, do not appear 44 to enter into their consideration of this subject. The * 4 whole is reduced to certain external performances ; and " in the Vedas, (the sacred books,) there are long enume- 46 rations of every species of offence which men can commit, 44 with the particular expiation prescribed for each. In ge- 44 neral, these expiations consist in pilgrimages, in living 44 and dying in places reputed holy, in ablutions, in pe- 44 nances, in the celebration of festivals, in fasts, in largesses 44 to Brahmins, in sacrifices and offerings to idols, in anoint- 6t ing the body with the excrements of a cow, and in other " expedients of a similar nature." (Ibid. p. 59.) He then particularizes holy rivers, and holy places, on which I have enlarged before ; and distinctly enumerates, under separate heads, offerings, festivals, almsgiving, endowments to the priests and to pagodas, rigorous penances, religious ser- vices for the dead, and works of supererogation. Now let any man only take the trouble of comparing the above heathen rites and observances with those of Popery, and he cannot fail at once to perceive the close similarity which obtains between them ; indeed, the connexion is so obvious, that in the summary given by Mr. Grant, of the abominable superstitions of the Indian idolatry, he 108 HEATHENISM AND POPERY [LETTER XIX. does not fail to hold up that connexion, with adequate reprobation, to the view of the British parliament, and public. "In short," says he, " the modes of expiating " guilt, and of acquiring merit, are endless among " this people. To accomplish this end is the business " of all their vast train of ceremonies, services, and ex- " ternal performances ; it is the very thing that has upheld " the fabric of Hindoo superstition, and has perpetuated the " credulity of the multitude, and the impostures of their " priests." (Ibid. p. 61.) Again, " Upon the whole then " it appears, that the Hindoos pursue methods of ob- " taining pardon of sin, without regard to the disposi- " tion of the mind, or the conduct of life. On their " own principles, they may go on committing wilful of- " fences every day, and as regularly wiping them off, and die 6t at last pure, and in peace, and pass through the water of " the Ganges to happiness in a new state.* For the viola- *' tions of conscience, which, though smothered, is not ex- " tinct ; for the disregard of truth, of justice, and of " mercy, their system has enabled them, without making " any, the slightest, compensation to men, to give sufficient " satisfaction to their gods. To them they pay a certain "- quit-rent, or acknowledgment, for liberty to do whatever " their inclination and ability may prompt them to, as far as " their fellow-creatures are concerned. Can we hesitate to " say what must be the effect of such principles on their " character? Among such a people, crimes must prevail. " True it is, and greatly to be lamented, the prevalence of " crimes is no new thing, nor peculiar to them. The an- " cient world exhibited a picture of the same kind ; and to " the dishonour of the Christian name, in countries nearer " home, that pure religion has been changed into a mys- " tery of imposture, and corruption. But, though it must " be said, that the light which overspreads Europe, has " prevented the same degree of effect from the system of * Extreme unction being here read, for sacred water, we have the analogy complete. LETTER XIX.] PRODUCE VICE. 109 " delusive fraud still practised there, yet have not the con- " sequences been infinitely prejudicial to those countries " where it has prevailed ; and is not that system likely, in " the end, to dissolve the frame of society in them." (Ib. p. 62.) I apprehend that the necessary tendency of Popery, like heathenism, to favour and propagate every species of vice and immorality, can hardly be better described. THE CONFORMITY BETWEEN THE STORIES OF THE PAGAN DEITIES AND THE ROMISH SAINTS may be here ad- duced, not because it has been omitted before, but because the example of heathen India affords further confirmation of the evidence supplied from ancient idolatry. In speak- ing of the Hindoo deities, Mr. Grant observes " The le- " gends and histories of their actions are innumerable, and " in the highest degree extravagant, absurd, ridiculous, and " incredible ;" (ibid. p. 64.) ; a remark which will serve, without the alteration of a word, to describe the shameless delusions recorded in the lives of the Romish saints and martyrs, for the belief of the world ; while such as do not choose to believe them, are branded as infidels. THE CONFORMITY BETWEEN THE ANCIENT AND MODERN IDOLATRY IN PRODUCING ACTUAL VICE, may Hl- t rod uce the masterly description of idolatry, and its con- sequences, which is briefly given by Mr. Grant. " The " worship and ceremonies," says he, " practised by the " Hindoos, with various circumstances appertaining to " them, have the effect of vitiating, as well as of stupifying " their minds. In an enlightened land, it may appear " superfluous formally to state, that such are the conse- " quences of idolatry ; but that which is admitted, it may " be well also, to recollect and to view, as exemplified in " practice. The divine nature is infinitely degraded by " every material representation ; and the man already so " gross as to resort to one, becomes more gross in using it. " If he does not at length drop the idea of a distinct invi- " sible Power, and think only of the object before him, (as " there is reason to suspect he will,) he at least believes that " his God inhabits the stock or the stone which he has set 110 TALISMANS AND SCAPUL ARIES. |_ LKTTER XIX ' " up. European apologists for so monstrous a practice " have been willing to deny this idea of idolatry ; but an " evidence of far superior authority, the author of the " Bhagvad, asserts its reality. He introduces Crishna, " who is there represented with supreme authority, saying, " ' The ignorant believe me, who am invisible, to exist in " ' the visible form under which they see me.' And the " learned translator of the Bhagvad is of opinion, that it was " one of the aims of that work, to induce men to believe " the supreme God, present in every image before which " they bent. Between depraved opinions entertained of tfc the Divine Being, and depraved practice, there is a 66 necessary and inseparable connexion. Those opinions " originate from corruption ; and he who makes a god for " himself, will certainly contrive to receive from him an " indulgence for his corrupt propensities." (Ib p. 65.) THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE TALISMANS OF HEATHENISM AND POPERY is remarkable. The old hea- thens had their portable gods, as well as their domestic ones ; and some charm or other against evil was commonly worn about their persons. Thus it is with the modern hea- thens in India. " With incantations," says Mr. Grant, " may be classed the endless variety of charms, spells, ta- " lismans, amulets, and other inventions of this nature, " of which no individual, small or great, of all the mil- lions of the Hindoo race, is destitute ;" (p. 68;) and now, only let an honest inquirer after truth take up one of the Romish scapularies, which are publicly sold, and given, by the Romish priests, all over Ireland, to their miserable devotees, and let him honestly say, whether there is any difference between them, and the talismans of ancient and modern heathenism ; let him only consult the account of the Romish scapulary, which is printed at Cork, and well known throughout Ireland, and say, whether he must not turn from such a collection of lies, with a disgust approach- ing to horror, more especially when he considers, that the falsehoods in question are calculated, like the other mira- cles of the Romish church, to support a system of doctrine LETTER XIX.] FASTING OF BOTH SYSTEMS. Ill fallacious in itself, and destructive to the souls of thou- sands. THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN ABSTINENCE FROM FOOD IN THE SYSTEMS OF PAGANISM AND POPERY may next be noticed. Mr. Grant observes of the Indian Heathens, " The ceremonies which respect the article of " food alone, might form a volume." (Ibid. p. 71.) And again he says, the Vedas prescribe " a purification of " three paraccas; that is, a total abstinence for twelve " days and nights, as setting free from all sins, however "heinous." (Ibid. p. 59.) The analogy between heathenism and popery, in this particular, will readily occur to all. It would be at once beside my purpose, and unnecessary to my argument, to show, that fasting was a malum in se : but in the abuse to which both heathenism and popery have alike subjected it, no true Christian can for a moment entertain a doubt that the corruption of each system, in this particular, has been identical. The mortification of the body (intended only, originally, as the means to an end) has, in either case, been deemed expiatory for the sin of the soul ; and Papists, like the Heathens, and Jews of old, have chosen rather to challenge Heaven, on the score of their own meritorious fastings, and pharisaical righte- ousness, than to submit to that moral renovation of heart and life which alone are designated in the Scriptures by the name of religion. The last point of resemblance between heathenism and popery to which I shall advert, is THE SUPREME POWEE AND PARAMOUNT INFLUENCE OF THEIR RESPEC- TIVE PRIESTHOODS, although this point has been noticed before. The priests of the ancient idolatry were the life and soul of a system which originated with, and mainly subsisted for, themselves. The duties which they incul- cated, and the penances which they prescribed, emanated from a common source, and depended upon the credit in which the order which established them was enabled to stand with the world around. Hence the priests alone, blind as they were, were the authorized guides of the 112 POWER OF THE PRIESTS. [LETTER XIX. blind, and teachers of the ignorant. They kept the people in utter ignorance, and virtually encouraged them in sin. They forged miracles to attest their own authority, and retained, in willing subjection, a world lying in wickedness, whom they had first succeeded in convincing that they were themselves essential to human happiness here, and endless immortality hereafter. Thus is fear, but not love, the bond between the priest, and the people, of Ireland. But let us again hear Mr. Grant on the subject of the priests of paganism ; and the conformity between them- selves, and their brethren of another system, will be apparent : " The absolute dominion which this religion " gives to the Brahmins over the rest of the people must " have forced itself upon the attention. No similar in- k< vention among men seems to have been so long, and so " completely, successful. This success may be accounted " for, partly, from a favourable concurrence of various " circumstances ; but, chiefly, from the character of the " religion itself. Erected upon the darkest ignorance, and " the boldest falsehood, it has been the work of ages to " strengthen these foundations, and to render the fabric " impregnable. The understanding is chained, and kept in " perpetual imprisonment, like dreaded rivals for power in " the East, who, deprived of their eyes, and immured in " dungeons, received poisoned provisions from the gaoler's " hands. Every avenue which might lead to emancipation " is strongly guarded. Fear is immeasurably excited, and " incessantly wrought upon ; not a rational fear of falling " into moral evil, and offending the righteous and holy " Sovereign of the universe, but a fear of numberless ficti- " tious dangers from every part of nature, from things " real and imaginary, in every situation, and in every " transaction. Fear is the grand instrument by which " these poor people are held down, never daring to " examine into the reality of what they are told is im- " pending over them. False hope is likewise held out to " them ; and they are taught to seek deliverance, safety, " and happiness, in a multitude of unmeaning, fantastic LETTER XIX.] POPERY COEVAL WITH PAGANISM. 113 " ceremonies, which constitute a grievous drudgery, en- " grossing their time, and confining their thoughts. In all " these rites, and in whatever regards the civil and per- " sonal, as well as the religious concerns of the Hindoos, " the Brahmins (or priests) have made themselves indis- " pensably necessary. They formed the religion, they are " the sole exclusive depositaries of its ordinances, they are " the expounders of them, they are the sole ministers, " either officiating or directing, in all the vast train of " ceremonies, observances, ablutions, defilements, purifica- " tions, penances, and works of supererogation, of which " their religion consists." (Ibid. p. 73.) Only apply all this to Ireland, and the analogy will be obvious. I cannot conclude this Letter without a single quotation from our own Spenser, illustrative of the specious and rotten fabric of popery : "It was a goodly heap for to behold, " And spake the praises of the workman's wit, " But full great pity that so fair a mould " Did on so weak foundation ever sit : " For on a sandy hill that still did flit, " And fall away, it mounted was full high, " That every breath of Heaven shaked it; " And all the hinder parts that few could spy, " Were ruinous and old, but painted cunningly." FAIRY QUEEN, Book i. Canto 4. LETTER XX. Concluding Reflections on the preceding Facts. A FEW reflections to which the foregoing remarks have given rise are ; 1. The Church of Rome, in vaunting of her antiquity, proves rather too much for her purpose. She is indeed 114 POPERY COEVAL WITH PAGANISM. [LETTER XX. of very ancient origin, for she is older than Christianity itself, and as old as paganism, her twin sister. It is easy to understand upon what principle the idolatry and super- stitions of paganism were at first adopted, and are still continued, by the Church of Rome: they present some- thing tangible, and visible, for the external senses to rest upon, in the place of that spiritual change of heart which the Bible, in all its parts, supposes as essential to salvation. Christianity, in its pure and primitive structure, had no charms for those pagans who had been accustomed to an imposing exterior of forms and ceremonies, which, while they amused their minds, and pacified their consciences, required no peculiar sacrifices, and left them in undisturbed possession of their former sins. The Church of Rome, aware of this fact, entered accordingly into a compromise with the old idolatry. Her object was secular dominion, and while this might be attained, she regarded the illumi- nation, and conversion, of the world but as secondary ob- jects, or rather as things more likely to obstruct her schemes of worldly policy, than to advance them. No writer has better established this fact than the celebrated Gale, (in his " Court of the Gentiles,") who, after proving, with extensive erudition, how paganism and popery sym- bolized in a variety of particulars, observes, " The carnal " professors of Christianity, who were most numerous, " were not content to part with their pagan rites ; where- " fore, to compromise the matter, they turned their pagan " rites into Christian solemnities, and so christened their " daemon festivals under the name of some Christian martyr " and saint ; and that which made this design more plau- " sible was this some groundless hopes, by such symbo- " lizing with the pagans, to gain them over to embrace the " Christian religion, which vain attempt was so far " blasted by God, as that it proved but a door to let in " Antichiist, and all his idol worship into the Church " of Rome." Human nature being the same in every age, there is no doubt that the idolatries and superstitions of the Romish Church have, from the earliest period of her LETTER XX.] TAPISTS' CHARGE OF HERESY REFUTED. 115 history, had the force of retaining within her visible pale a vast majority in succession, who, if they had not been nominal Christians, would have been professed infidels, but who found in the round of external and pharisaical ob- servances which Popery prescribes, a sedative for their fears, and a substitute for their piety. The Reformed churches of the Continent, and of this country, have pro- tested, with vigour and effect, against a system which, while it is eminently calculated to amuse the multitude by a specious exterior, is no less adapted to hold them in spi- ritual bondage, by blinding their minds, and sensualizing their hearts by giving them the shadow of religion in- stead of its substance, and by setting up a variety of idols in the place of the one, true, and living God of the Scriptures. 2. With what injustice does the Church of Rome charge her younger sister, the Protestant Church, with heresy ! the translators of the English Bible observe on such a charge in their preface: " Heretics they call us, by the " same right that they call themselves Catholics, both being " wrong." The continued determination of the Romish church, in all her official acts, down to this hour, to brand every Protestant with the title of a heretic, and, by a ne- cessary consequence, to hold him amenable to all her severe, and unrepealed, laws against heretics, is the best evidence of what may be expected from the operation of a persecu- ting spirit, if the power of exercising it were again to oc- cur ; and this observation will hold good, notwithstanding all that may be asserted to the contrary, either by Roman Catholics who are not empowered to answer for their own church, or by Protestants who are still less empowered, and the majority of whom are altogether ignorant both of the principles, and practices, of that church whose cause they unwittingly advocate. As far, indeed, as the Church of England is concerned with the charge of heresy, she needs no other defence than that with which the apostle has sup- plied her : " This I confess unto thee, that after the way 116 NOMINAL PllOTESTANTS. [LETTER XX. " which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my " Fathers." (Acts xxiv. 14.) 3. The perilous nature of such a profession as that of popery to its members is great indeed, since the very foun- dation of her whole system is laid in the virtual rejection of the two first commands in the Decalogue. That multi- tudes who live and die in the communion of the Church of Rome do yet escape the contagion of their own creed, and are preserved by the special grace of God, sincere and ex- emplary Christians, is readily admitted ; but it is no less true, that the whole machinery of the system erected by that church, is opposed to the Scriptures of truth, and only designed to exalt the authority of a secular priesthood, and to keep the world in perpetual ignorance and error ; and in point of fact, the Church of Rome, by engrafting on the native stock of Christianity the most awful depravation of doctrine, has overspread the world at large with a pro- portionate corruption in practice. 4. The agreement which has been shown to exist be- tween the worship of false gods, as exhibited in the pagan and papal religions, and the worship of the true God, as revealed in the religion of the Holy Scriptures, speaks loudly to those nominal professors of Protestantism who are wearing their own religion much too loosely about them to stand in a posture for public or private trial ; nay, who may even be halting between two opinions ; and, amidst the increased exertions for converts now making by the Church of Rome, are almost disposed to go over to " the " old religion," as it is triumphantly called by its advo- cates, and (as we have seen) most truly called, although in a sense which they will be very unwilling to allow. Cer- tainly, as far as the great interests of truth are concerned, the Protestant cause will gain as little by the adherence, as it will lose by the defection, of such nominal professors, while to themselves, individually, it will be of little import- ance in which rank they are found at last : but their pre- sent ignorance of -the religion into which they were baptized, LETTER XX.] VALUE OF THE SCRIPTURES. 117 and of that to which they are invited, may justify anxiety on their own account. If they determine for the Protestant faith, let them at least understand to what it is they adhere, and if for the Popish, to what it is they depart. 5. It is impossible to close this parallel between Hea- thenism and Popery, without remarking that where the Bible is wholly unknown, as in the heathen world, or only partially known, as in the Popish church, idolatry and su- perstition are inevitable. This happy and highly favoured country has, of late, been invited (though not by the voice of authority) to commemorate the tercentenary of the English Reformation, inasmuch as on Sunday, the 4th of October, 1835, precisely three centuries had elapsed since the printing of the English translation of the Bible, by Myles Coverdale, afterwards Bishop of Exeter. This call was loudly responded to, throughout the united empire, both in, and out of, the national establishment, and consi- derable interest appears to have been excited, in conse- quence, upon the paramount question " of the sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for salvation," (as defined by the sixth article of our Church,) " so that whatsoever is not " read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be " required of any man, that it should be believed as an arti- " cle of faith, or be thought requisite or necessary to salva- " tion." Hence the inalienable right of every human being to the possession, and perusal, of the Scriptures of eternal truth, as opposed to all the traditions, and inventions, of fallible creatures like himself ; and hence, again, the inde- fensible injustice, and impiety, of any man, or order of men, presuming to refuse, or restrict, the circulation of the re- vealed will of the Almighty, as the common property of all his rational creatures. It is in vain for the members of the Romish Church to assert that any change, or modification, has taken place in the decrees of the Council of Trent, and the oft-repeated prohibitions of the sovereign Pontiff against the circulation of the word of God. The Bull of the late Pope Pius VII., 118 VALUE OF THE SCRIPTURES. [LETTER XX. in particular, against the British, and Continental, Bible Societies, dated from Rome the 29th of June, 1816, cha- racterizes the circulation of the Scriptures as " an abomi- " nable device, undermining the very foundation of reli- gion ;" designates the Bible Society as " a pestilence" " a defilement of the faith," and " of the most imminent " peril to souls " as " the impious machination of inno- " vators," and " an abominable scheme, the wickedness " of which, it is the duty of the episcopal office to expose." His Holiness further declares that " the Holy Scriptures, *' in the vulgar tongue, have through the temerity of men " been PRODUCTIVE OF MORE INJURY THAN ADVANTAGE" . enjoins strict adherence to the decree " of the 13th of " June 1757, which prohibits all versions of the Scriptures " in the vernacular tongues, except such as are approved " by the apostolic see, and published with annotations ;" and finally guards all true Papists against " the snares " which are prepared for their eternal destruction ;" that is to say, by the translations, of our own, and all other, Pro- testant churches. This Bull is of course in full force and validity : indeed any supposition to the contrary, would be to charge the supreme authority from which it emanated, with error, while he is as notoriously too infallible to be mistaken, as his system is too immutable to improve. Can it be any matter of surprise, after this, that they who both refuse to be guided by the inspired Scriptures, and withhold them from the people, should be left to fall into the delusions even of the heathens themselves ? And can any argument present a stronger appeal to their own followers, to think, and act for themselves, than the awful consideration that " if " the blind lead the blind, BOTH shall fall into the ditch ?" At all events, let British Christians prize, above all their other blessings, the inestimable privilege of using and cir- culating the revelation of God that great and especial glory of their own Reformation ; in which case, they will not fail to dread, and deprecate, in an equal degree, the in- POSTSCRIPT. 119 roads and encroachments of a church, which, while it is ostensibly founded on the Holy Scriptures, is proved, to demonstration, to have symbolized with the heathens of old, and, in conjunction with the Pharisees of a later age, to have made void those Scriptures by its own traditions. P.S. In addition to the numerous authorities which are either cited, or referred to, in this publication, the follow- ing Works will be found to support, and illustrate, the position of the writer, namely, that POPERY, properly so called, as defined by the council of Trent, is a modification of PAGANISM. " A true and lively representation of Popery showing " that Popery is only new-modelled Paganism, and per- " fectly destructive of the great ends, and purposes, of God " in the gospel." 1677. " Gale's Court of the Gentiles." 2 vols. 4to, 1669-77. " Conformite des Ceremonies modernes avec les Anci- " ennes, ou Ton prouve, par des autorites incontestables, " que les ceremonies de FEglise Romaine sont empruntees " des Payens." Par Pierre Mussard Geneve, et Leyde. 1667. Note. An English Translation of Mussard was pub- lished in London in 1732, entitled, " Roma Antiqua et " Recens, or the Conformity of Ancient and Modern Cere- " monies, showing, from indisputable testimonies, that the " ceremonies of the Church of Rome are borrowed from " the Pagans, Translated from the French," [by James Dupre.] " Papists no Catholics, and Popery no Christianity." By Lloyd, Bishop of Worcester. " The Conformity of Ancient and Modern Ceremonies." Author uncertain. " Popery not founded on Scripture." 4to. London, 1688. In the British Museum. " Rise and growth of Popery, from Vanity to Supersti- 120 POSTSCRIPT. " tion thence to worse than Heathen Idolatry/' 8vo. London, 1680. In the British Museum. " Conformita delle Ceremonie Cinesi coir Idolatria " Greca e Romana." " Pangano Papismus; or an exact Parallel between " Rome Pagan, and Rome Christian, in their Doctrines, " and Ceremonies." By the Rev. Joshua Stopford, 1678. In the British Museum. " A Comparison between Popery and Paganism." By the Rev. Samuel Johnson, Chaplain to Lord William Russell. In the British Museum. u A Discovery of Popish Paganism," deducing the Su- perstitions of the Romish Church from the Rites of Pa- ganism. By the Rev. Oliver Ormerod, Rector of Hunts- pill. " The Conformity between Popery and Paganism il- lustrated." London, 4to. 1746. By the Rev. T. Seward, Prebendary of Salisbury. In the British Museum. The work to which the writer has been chiefly indebted is entitled, 4< A Letter from Rome, showing an exact con- " formity between Popery and Paganism, or the Religion " of the present Roman Catholics derived from that of " their Heathen Ancestors. 11 By the Rev. Dr. Conyers Middleton. With a Preparatory Discourse and Ap- pendix. LONDON: inOTSON AND PA1.MFR, PRINTERS, SAVOY STREET, STRAND, RETURN TO the circulation desk of any University of California Library or to the NORTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY Bldg. 400, Richmond Field Station University of California Richmond, CA 94804-4698 ALL BOOKS MAY BE RECALLED AFTER 7 DAYS 2-month loans may be renewed by calling (510)642-6753 1-year loans may be recharged by bringing books to NRLF Renewals and recharges may be made 4 days prior to due date DUE AS STAMPED BELOW AUG 3 1 2005 BXms Pi UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UBRARY