SF L6 RLF 111 SB 3M HOgS ByA.J.Lovejoy Supplementary Chapters on Feeding JohnM.Eward GIFT OF Agricultural Educ.Div. HOgS By A . J. Lovejoy r \\fith Supplementary Chapters on Feeding John M Ewa r d A PRACTICAL BOOK FOR THE PURE BRED SWINE BREEDER AND FARMER Chicago The Frost Publishing Co. 1919 Copyright, 1919. by Frost Publishing Co. S F 9 - A. J. LOVEJOY INTRODUCTION THE author has not undertaken to write a thesis, but having commenced the business of swine breeding when quite a young _ man and following it for practically forty years, he has been requested to write this book along practical lines. Beginning with a pair of young pigs many years ago, the only way anything concerning the subject has been learned has been by actual experience. This experience has been costly, but what is learned at the greatest expense one never forgets. For many years the writer did all his own work in the business of swine breeding and feeding as well as showing. He gained in knowledge as he gained in experience. I cannot recall any labor or duties connected with the feeding and breeding of swine that I have not carried on personally, and step by step grown in the busi- ness from the smallest possible beginning until a trade has been built up that extends throughout the United States and into for- eign countries. Being of a temperament that never gives up, and with a determination to -stick to the business through thick and thin, I have never wavered from my determination to make it a success and a permanent business. Early I decided to follow the purebred business, selling prin- cipally to breeders, and feeding for market hogs that did not come up to a standard of excellence necessary to satisfy customers. I have never had any reason to change my first decision. Of course, in the early days it was a hard matter to find customers, but good care, feeding and advertising and the following of the showring, gradually brought us to the attention of farmers and breeders, and as the years came and went I could see a gradual increase of business and of knowledge regarding it, and each year I went out a little stronger in the showring, did a little more business over the circuit and found a larger correspondence at home; all of which was gratifying and encouraging. It was my good fortune also to believe in system in all things, and to system I attribute much of my success later. Careful records were kept of all animals breeding dates, far- rowing dates, marking of the litters, and disposition of the same, showing to whom sold and prices received ; correct accounts regard- ing expenses and receipts, making a thorough system of book- keeping. It has always been our custom promptly to answer all correspondence, keeping a carbon copy of the reply to every letter. Before typewriters were used, all letters were written with a pen, and a letter press was used in taking an impression in the copy book. It is no trouble for us today to turn to any year's business, or to find out, if the question is asked, what animal we sold to a certain man years ago. fl FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN Nothing has ever been done on this farm in the matter of breed- ing but is on record; therefore we do not depend on our memory for anything connected with the business. What I have learned during these many years of close contact with the business is written .out in this book. I hope that many a young man, new in the business, or perhaps the older man of experience, may find some fact or view that will interest and help him. It is for the benefit of my fellow-breeders, feeders and farm- ers that I have attempted to write it, and it was with great diffi- dence that I undertook it, even after urgent solicitation, and I only trust that it may meet with the approval of those who are striving to make a success of the swine business. In advising a beginner I can only say: Select the breed that you think you would like best, no matter what color. After fully deciding with which one you will begin, stick to it, and do not let anything cause you to waver. You cannot make a success by using first one breed and then another. Stick to the one you have selected, and by every means possible get all available information regarding it. Be honest, and remember that it takes time to build up a busi- ness, and after it is once established one must be as- careful to main- tain it as he was in building it. What is there about the farm more interesting than a bunch of good hogs? PART 1 CHAPTER I THE IDEAL HOG FARM. The writer has never seen an ideal hog farm in every respect. While many farms are almost ideal, usually they lack something. My idea of an ideal hog farm is that it should first have a rich soil, full of fertility to grow grasses and other forage, as well as the grains needed for the best feeds for the proper development- of hogs. After a good rich soil, the next thing is a slightly rolling well-drained farm. If it is underlaid three or four feet with gravel, as much of our soil in northern Illinois is, it will not require tiling to carry off surplus water. I have often noticed that a farm that lies quite level, and has a rich black soil, gets very muddy after rains and during the coming out of the frost in the spring. This kind of soil is not best for ideal hograising ; besides, being extremely muddy at times, this class of soil does not come as near being ideal as a dark sandy loam, well-drained with underground natural drain- age. Such soil is also better even during dry weather for the feet of pigs. They are rather more inclined to keep in shape and wear down a little all the time instead of growing long and turning up at the toes, as do many pigs kept on soft, mucky black soil. If one wishes a central hoghouse for general use, rather than a feedhouse and half -acre lots in which individual houses are placed, he should place his central house where pastures can be easily reached from either side. The kind of house he should use is one of the modern swine houses, described on page 12. It should be situated so that a good pasture of well-set grass or mixture of grasses can be reached from either side. Pastures before being occupied in this manner should be well-set in grass at least a year before being used as hog pasture. A small pen the same width as those on the inside of the hog- house should extend outward from the pen 16 or more feet, just for convenience, and gates opening from these to the regular pas- ture, which may be acre lots, half -acre lots or much larger, accord- ing to whether the breeder cares to keep each sow and litter separ- ate after they go on grass. If half -acre lots are used, each should have a sleeping house at the rear end, and artificial shade, if there is not natural shade in each lot, for the comfort of the sow and litter during hot weather. They should come to the general house for feeding. Forage Crop Mixture. A mixture of clover, alfalfa, orchard grass and other grasses makes ideal pasture. The lots should be situated on either side of the general hoghouse. Arrangements for 8 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN watering should be ma.de so that all can drink from the central house. Small fields of forage should be grown where a large number of sows or young hogs may be placed after weaning time, or those that have already weaned their litters, or animals being fitted for market that would not necessarily be obliged to remain in the central house and lot, but could run in the larger lots and larger numbers together. I quote the following on the value of forage crops for swine from Bulletins Nos. 136 and 143, from the Iowa Experiment Station: "Probably there is no kind of pasture that becomes green and suitable for hogs as early in the season as a field of winter rye, sown early in the fall previous. This rye often furnishes good grazing through the late fall and early winter, or until it becomes covered with snow, then it is the first thing that will furnish a green bite in the spring, coming on much earlier than either alfalfa or clover. "Following the early rye comes alfalfa, which furnishes green pasture a little earlier than any of the clovers. By May 1 in the northern latitude red clover will furnish a splendid pasture until such time as it begins to dry and burn by the hot weather. By this time a field of rape should be ready; it is probably as good pasture for making growth and gains as any other one kind of green forage. This should be sown in May and the pigs should be kept off of it until it becomes a few inches high, after which it will stand extremely heavy pasturing. "Where one wishes to hog down corn in the fall by turning in a large number to fatten for market, there is nothing that will combine with this as well as Dwarf Essex rape, drilled in between the rows just after the last cultivation of corn. By the time the corn is ready to turn the hogs on you have an ideal ration in the same field; or rye sown with the rape also makes a good combination." No greater opportunity exists for cheapening pork production than through the general adoption of a forage crop system for spring pigs. Where alfalfa pasture is used in this climate it should not be pastured earlier than May 1 nor later than November, as it must have enough growth after pasturing to make a cover crop for the winter. Where rape pasture is used it will be found good at any time during the growing season and furnish abundant pas- ture after the clovers are dry and dead; in fact will furnish good pasture until freezing weather comes. It can be used either for pasturing or for soiling, that is, cutting and carrying to the lot where the pigs are kept if they are not turned into the field. Young hogs can be pushed very fast by having this good rape pasture and ear corn, plus one-tenth of the corn in meat meal or best quality tankage. This meatmeal or tankage is a great help in furnishing the necessary protein and has a tendency to stop the inclination for rooting that many pigs have when on clover or alfalfa. In Winter Quarters. When hogs and pigs are in winter quar- ters with no succulent feed such as pasture, the other feeds may be supplemented by using a good quality of third cutting alfalfa which is greener and better than that of former cuttings. This may be fed whole in racks made for the purpose to save waste, or it may be run through a cutting machine and chaffed, and then mixed 2 parts chaffed alfalfa, one part shelled corn and one part THE IDEAL HOG FARM oats, thoroughly mixed and ground through a steel burr grinder, which is better than any other for this kind of a mixture. If desired a little middlings may be added and a little tankage to make a balanced ration, and a complete one. This may be fed dry in troughs where there would be no waste, or can be steamed a little and thoroughly mixed so that all particles of ground feed and alfalfa are well mixed. This makes an ideal feed in the winter for brood sows or growing sows. A little of it for fall pigs is good but they should also have a feed once or twice a day of a warm slop containing skimmed milk if possible, or enough tankage to balance the other materials. Location. Further along the line of the ideal hog farm, I wish to say that this farm should be located as near as possible to a good shipping point or on an Interurban line leading to some city where one or more railroads enter, the more the better. It should also be located on a good hard road rather than on muddy lanes or steep hills, so that pigs could be delivered at any time during the year rain or shine. It should also have some portion of the farm covered with a nice growth of trees where dry sows and young hogs could be carried along on good pasture between breeding sea- sons. This pasture for best results should have springs or running water of some kind, but springs would be preferable rather than a stream running through the farm. The farm should be large enough to furnish all the grain and feed that would be used in the business, as well as straw to make first-class bedding, and fields should all be rather small, say from 10 to 20 acres each and all fences, both outside and division, should be made of woven wire with steel or cement posts, so that when once built there would be no need of repairing for a generation. Suitable gates made of galvanized piping with woven wire should open into every field and pasture. These gates should not be less than 14 feet wide, so that teams could be driven in and out when necessary. Suitable barns, nicely painted and kept in good repair, should be of sufficient num- ber to contain all the products of the farm, both grain, hay and straw. A small building used as a shop should by all means be on every well regulated breeding farm, where crates, hurdles and anything along these lines could be made as needed. This shop should be furnished with a complete set of tools, including car- penters tools, pump, tongs, various kinds of wrenches and all such tools as are constantly needed on a farm. Shop Equipment. If the owner has any knowledge of black- smithing a portable forge, and a drilling outfit should also be in the shop. Also a good heating stove so that work could be done here in cold or stormy weather. ^ If the business was large enough to justify, a nice small office should be on every breeding farm, so that all comers would have a place where they could go and "talk hog" to their heart's content without being obliged to do this in the dwelling. All buildings should be built of good material, nicely painted and always kept in good condition. The various Jiog houses, as well as the smaller individual ones should all be nicely 10 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN made of lumber and well painted and each should be numbered. A plat of the farm proper should also be made by a surveyor and each field numbered, so that a regular record can be kept of what each field produced and what its crop rotation should be each year. All convenient utensils should be kept on every swine breeding farm such as mixing vat, steam boiler or water heater, good well made galvanized pails and dippers, a set of scales in the feed house or some other convenient barn where pigs and feed for them can be weighed, so that one could keep his feed account and know how much feed he was giving each different lot of pigs or hogs. Water should be in every feed house, either pumped directly with windmill or engine or from a compressed air water system. A low down wagon should be had, with the bottom not over 12 or 14 inches above the ground large enough to hold three to five barrels, or in lieu of this a galvanized tank made to set on the wagonT'with about 4 com- partments holding a barrel or more each, with covers strongly hinged with iron hinges to cover openings, so there would be no slopping from the tank when hauled from yard to yard or from field to field. Feed house should be so arranged that this wagon could be driven into it, where feed and water could be mixed and where the steam could be turned into the feed in cold weather if desired. If a central hog house is used a system of ventilation should be arranged so that the walls would not be covered with dampness or ice during cold weather. A chute for loading pigs into wagon or into crates set on a platform wagon should be made and set on a pair of wheels, so that it would almost balance and could be wheeled from one place to another, a picture of which is shown herewith. Chute for Loading Hogs Into Wagon or Crate THE IDEAL HOG FARM 11 This will be found much more convenient than to lift the crate from the ground whenever you wish to load a hog. A small pen in the swine house or other place where water is convenient should be made with a cement floor and outlet to sewer, where pigs could be sprayed or washed and cleaned ready for shipment. Pigs should always, especially during the warmer months, be nice and clean before being crated for shipment. In fact everything about the farm of the breeder should be attractive in appearance and general arrangement. Pigs about the same age and size should always be yarded or pastured together, as they show to much better advantage ; in other words the herd should be divided up in as even bunches as pos- sible, all yearlings together, under year sows or boars in separate yards each, early spring pigs and late ones in separate yards, and so on all along the line. It makes a better impression on a visitor than to see all ages and sizes running together. CHAPTER II A COMPLETE SWINE HOUSE Where one is raising hogs on a large scale and does not have to skimp for money to build proper buildings, the building known as the Myers plan, Plate I, is probably the most convenient swine house, with pasture and house attached, that could be built. The swine house proper is built in a circle 87 ft. in diameter with 20 pens around the outer circle, each pen being 13 ft. front by 12 ft. in depth and each opening to a one-half acre pasture, as shown in ground plan of building and pastures, Plate II, with the sleeping house at rear end of each lot, with additional larger pastures open- ing out from each of these half-acre ones. You will notice also PLATE I. Myers Plan Hog House by the ground plan that each half-acre lot has artificial shade along the fence between each two lots, thus accommodating the pigs in each yard. The house, proper, which stands in the center of the circle, is 30 ft. in diameter, with feed bins around the circle, Plate IV. This part should be made with all concrete floor. You will notice an alley out each side of this feed house. Inside is located a hydrant or pump with a drain which runs to a sewer. A steel overhead track with carrier should be used in this building to carry the feed out to the cement walk around the front of the feeding pens, thus making a very convenient way of feeding, requiring no heavy lifting to feed in a trough, as shown in the side view. These 12 A COMPLETE SWINE HOUSE 13 troughs should be made of cast iron or boiler iron. I would suggest in making these houses that a good article of prepared roofing other than galvanized iron be used. Galvanized iron draws too much heat, and another thing : it would have to be painted every year or it would soon rust out. A wagon scale should be located PLATE II. Ground Plan of Pastures in the circle outside of the feed house, this circle being 24 ft. 5 in. in width between the concrete walk and the feed house all the way around and should be filled with cinders or gravel. This style of house would be a delightful place to work in and care for the herd, as one would never have to be out in the weather during summer or winter. All feeding would be done on a concrete floor, and the pigs could go out and in from the feeding floor to the pastures or sleeping quarters at will. \ strongly recommend this house where a breeder has a large enough herd and business to justify it. It would require about 40 acres of land for the entire 14 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN PLATE III. Sectional View of the Myers Swine House A COMPLETE SWINE HOUSE 15 plant. The land should be well-set in clover, alfalfa and other grasses before being occupied. To make an extra nice job, the yards could all be fenced with what is known as the galvanized hollow iron post, about 2 in. in diameter, which should be made 5 ft. in length and driven into the ground and the woven wire reed Hcutt tn c r- I J~^ CC O 0^ C a o O c5 <& E t. <$+> ' *^ ^^ O ^ I z CO 0* O iH 02 03 to to Oi Oi Oi O So c o 000 OJ tO to to Oi Oi o o ^ in CJ> 00 O 00 O TJ-C^ -p p 55 5 O3 IO ^ in co C^ 00 0> c c c 000 0) 00 O cC oJ cC o5 c o , simply stating the breeding and a true description of what you have to sell, with the price. Stationery. The style and quality of stationery one uses is also one of the things that makes an impression on the inquirer. A neat, plain letterhead, with as little printing on it as possible, and paper of a good quality, speaks well for the breeder and impresses his correspondent with the belief that this man is not making any extra flourishes. A good judge of human nature can quite readily determine something as to the character of a man by his stationery, and still more by the letter he writes. We have never found it necessary in our business to cover very much paper in replying to a letter. However, we often receive letters that contain quite a number of pages, which after reading and trying to digest, it is hard to really know just what the man wants, further than that he seems to want an animal that will score upwards to 100 points, and then wants it for an extremely low price, with all the guarantees he can think of, added. There is another matter that is quite important in the way of advertising; always have your home grounds, hog quarters and other parts of the equipment of the hog establishment, as well as 82 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN the hogs themselves, in shipshape for visitors. Do not feel obliged when a man suddenly appears on your farm to inspect your herd, to commence apologizing for the condition of things in general. Al- ways have them so that a good impression may be made on the mind of a visitor, for he is taking all things in as he passes down the line, and you certainly wish to make a good and not a bad impression. First impressions are lasting and these should be as favorable as one can offer. When writing advertisements one should try and be as concise as possible, and not say too much, but say it in a way that will at- tract the attention of the reader. The writing of advertisements is an art. CHAPTER XXVI HOME-CURED PORK I have often wondered why more farmers who grow pork for the market, do not take up the business of a farm packing plant on a small scale. I am sure pigs and hogs of different weights could be slaughtered on the farm; the products cured in the good old home way, and sold to local stores or markets for better prices and better profits than could be received for live weight. I feel certain that a farmer who would prepare for this work could profit- ably market a high class article of all pork sausage something that cannot be found in a butcher shop. He should take great pains to make this as perfect as possible, just as he would make it for his own family. Put it up in attractive packages of one, two or five pounds each, and furnish one or more of the best groceries in the nearby city. Or the farmer could send out small sample packages to the better class of citizens in the city and he soon would build up a retail trade that would astonish him, and at prices much above anything sold by the butchers. Further than this, the hams could be home-cured in a sweet pickle or mild cure and smoked as they should be, slightly, rather than be cured "while you wait" with chemicals, and smoked with creosote dressing. There is no more delicate morsel than a farm- cured ham from a young pig of about 200 pounds. There is a great demand for such hams during the winter season, without any smok- ing whatever. I personally like this kind of curing better than when smoked, but hams cured in this manner would not keep dur- ing the long summer months. The older hog, with the exception of the spare ribs, should be made into sausage. There would be little fat pork in light young hogs, but older ones could be finished for this purpose from which extra fine fat pork could be furnished, as well as a very choice quality of home made lard. Pickled pigs' feet, head-cheese and souse could be easily introduced to the fancy trade. The main thing is in starting this business and going at it with the determination to build up a business. I believe a farmer could hardly raise enough hogs and pigs in a year to supply the demand for the fancy pork products that he could put up, as the consump- tion of pork products is constantly increasing from year to year. We must remember that every morning there are over three thous- and new mouths to feed in America, and practically every one of them to eat the product of the American hog and enjoy it. Meat production increases wealth, and the grain products of the farm can all be utilized in the production of high-class pork. We have no animal of greater economic value than the pig; he matures quickly and brings ready returns. If there was no money in pork 83 84 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OP A PRACTICAL HOG MAN the farmers of the west would not grow eighty-five million dollars worth each year, to supply foreign nations, besides keeping enough at home to supply the demand of our own people. Boneless Pigs' Feet. Cut the feet off with a sharp knife and a little saw, well above the ankle joint; wash in hot water and scrape thoroughly and clean. Lay them in salt water over night to remove all blood. Put on to cook with enough slightly salted cold water to cover, and cook from three to five hours, until the bones loosen. Place the meat in a chopping bowl and chop medium fine. Strain the liquor in the pot in which the feet were boiled and season it with vinegar and pepper to taste. Then add the meat and cover with this juice to which should be added more hot water, as it will bear diluting. When cold turn out of the bowl and cut down in slices half an inch thick. Pigs' Feet Souse. Cut off the horny part of the feet and toes; scrape clean and wash thoroughly ; singe off any stray hairs. Place in a kettle with plenty of water, boil and skin. Pour off the water and add fresh, and boil again until the bones will pull out easily, but do not pull them out. Pack in a stone jar with pepper and salt sprinkled between each layer; cover with good cider vinegar. When wanted for the table take out in sufficient quantity and put in a hot skillet ; add more vinegar, salt and pepper if needed ; boil until thoroughl}' heated; stir in a smooth thickening of flour and water, and boil until the flour is cooked. Serve hot for a nice breakfast dish. Head Cheese. Having thoroughly cleaned the pig or hog head, split it in two ; take out the eyes and the brains ; thoroughly clean the ears; throw scalding water over the head and ears and then scrape absolutely clean. When perfectly clean put in a kettle, with water to cover, and set over a quick fire, skimming as any scum arises. When boiled so the flesh leaves the bone, take the head from the water with a skimmer, and place in a large wooden bowl or tray; then take out every particle of bone, chop the meat fine, season to taste with salt and pepper a little powdered sage may be added spread a cloth over the colander, put the meat in, fold the cloth closely over it, lay weight on it so that it will press every part of the surface equally. When cold take the weight off; remove from the colander and place in a crock. Some add vinegar in the proportion of one pint to each gallon crock. Fried Salt Pork. Cut in rather thin slices, freshen by letting stand an hour or two in cold water or milk and water. Roll in flour and fry until crisp. Drain off most of the grease from fry- ing pan. Stir in, while hot, one or two tablespoons of flour, half a pint new milk, a little pepper and salt, if necessary. Let boil and pour into gravy dish. This makes a nice white gravy when properly made. HOME-CURED PORK 85 Baked Ham. Most persons boil ham. It is much better baked, if baked right. Soak the whole ham for an hour in clear water and wipe it dry. Next spread it all over with thin batter, and put into as deep dish with sticks under it to keep it up out of the gravy. When it is fully done take off the skin and batter crusted upon the flesh side and set away to cool. It should bake from six to eight hours. After removing the skin, sprinkle over the ham two tablespoons of sugar, some black pepper and rolled crackers. Put in a pan and return to oven to brown. Then stick cloves to the fat portion and dust with powdered cinnamon. Boiled Ham. Pour boiling water over the ham, and let it stand until cool enough to wash. Scrape clean; put in a thor- oughly cleansed boiler with enough could water to cover it; bring this to the boiling point and then place on the back of the stove and let simmer steadily for from six to seven hours or until very tender when pierced with a fork be careful to keep the water at boiling point but do not allow to go much above. Turn the ham once or twice while in the water. When done put in bak- ing dish to skin. Dip the hands in cold water and take the skin between the fingers and peel it as you would an orange. Set in a moderate oven placing the lean part of the ham downward. Sift over it rolled crackers and bake one hour. Or cover with the white of a raw egg and sprinkle sugar and finely pulverized bread crumbs over it. Place in the oven and brown. The baking brings out a quantity of fat leaving the meat much more delicate ; in warm weather it will keep in a dry, cool place for a long time. Boneless Boiled Ham. Soak a well cured ham in tepid water over night, boil it until perfectly tender, putting it on in warm water. Take up in a wooden tray and let cool. Remove the bone carefully, press the ham again into shape and return to the boiling liquor. Remove pot from fire and let ham remain until cold. Cut cross wise and serve cold. Delicious Fried Ham With Eggs. Slice ham and place in boil- ing water and cook until tender. Put in frying pan and brown; then place on platter. Fry some eggs by dipping gravy over their until done instead of turning them. Take up carefully and lay on slices of ham. Ham and Egg Lunch Loaf. Chop remnants of cold boiled ham; add crushed crackers and from three to six eggs, according to the amount of meat. Bake in a round baking powder can and when cold it may be sliced for the table. Ham Balls. Take half a cup of bread crumbs and mix with two eggs well beaten. Chop fine some bits of cold boiled ham and mix all together. Make into balls and fry. To Cook Pickled Side Meat. Cut in slices to fry; parboil to freshen. Roll in flour and fry until cooked through. 86 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN Home-Made Sausage. It is the writer's job to make the Berk- shire sausage at Love joy Farm and in doing this I take much of the choice meat that might be used for other purposes, often using the entire shoulder of the hog as well as all trimmings from the ham, sides, etc., using about equal proportions of the fat meat and lean, although sometimes making sausage largely all lean meat, yet I do not think this gives as good or as tender, well flavored sausage as where the fat and lean are of about equal proportions. We often use. the tenderloin strips also in the sausage meat yet this is almost too delicious a dish, when fried by itself, to be given up by placing it in the sausage. After all meat is prepared for sausage it is run through a grinding chopper and made very fine. We also pulverize sage through this same meat grinder, then flavor the meat with salt, pepper and sage to taste. Dsuring cold weather it is kept in large crocks and cooked as needed. Where large quantities are made to be kept through the summer, it is cooked and placed in muslin sacks of about twelve inches in length and three or four inches in diameter, which are then dipped in hot lard until the cloth is well filled with the lard, then taken out and placed in a cool, dark cellar to be used as desired. Curing Thick White Fat Pork. Where one wishes to put up the very thick fat pork for home use, he may cure this by what is known as dry salting. Take a large earthen jar, large enough to hold all one wishes to pack, put a layer of salt in the bottom of the jar, then pack the square cut pieces of pork snugly together and fill all spaces with salt, and a light covering over the top, then another layer of fat meat as before and continue this until all is packed and thickly covered over the top with 'salt. Set this in a cool place where rats or mice cannot get to it, and let it remain, using from it whenever the real fat pork is needed. Home-Made Lard. It is best for the farmer to make his own lard when possible for the simple reason that it is cheaper than to sell his hogs on the market and then purchase lard; besides, when the housewife makes lard for home use she knows what she is using. Lard is almost a pure oil of a permanent composi- tion, and moisture and air have little affect on it. Care should be taken to see that the lard is pure, such as the leaf lard, especially if it is to be kept for any length of time. Stone, jars are the best vessels to keep the lard in after being rendered, and should always be kept in a cool, dry place. Besides the lard made from the leaf lard, there is much more of the animal fat that can be used for this purpose. All the trimmings of fat from the hams or shoulders, and all the gut fat may be rendered into a good quality of lard. Many persons who do not care for the fat pork, or at least as much of it as is furnished from the fat hog carcass, can use all that is not needed for fat pork for the manufacture of lard. A Recipe for Curing Hams. Many years ago, at a show in New York State, a farmer won a $100 prize for the best home- HOME-CURED PORK 87 cured ham. I have used his recipe ever since, and with great satis- faction. To 100 pounds of meat use 8 pounds of clean pulverized rock salt, 3 pounds of brown sugar, 2 ounces of pulverized saltpetre, 2 ounces of bicarbonate of soda (cooking soda), 4 ounces of red pepper. After the hams are thoroughly cooled, rub in the above mixture well and place them in a tub or box and let them remain in this container for one week. Make a brine of the above mixture, which should be boiled and strained through a cloth, and left till cold. Then after brushing the dry mixture from the hams, place them in a tub or large earthen jar or any receptacle that is big enough to hold them, and pour brine over them, so that they will be entirely covered. Place a floating cover over the hams, and on this cover a heavy weight so as to hold the hams under the brine, and leave them for one week, after which they can be taken out and smoked, if desired. Should you not wish to smoke these hams, they can be left in this brine and used as needed, until hot weather. The bacon and shoulders, back meat and fat meat can all be cured in like manner. This method of curing produces a very delicate and choice product and would be termed a "mild cure" for hams and bacons. The manner of smoking can be done as preferred, but we use many of our hams without smoking at all, if used before hot weather comes on. Such portions of ham and shoulders as are not to be smoked may be left in the brine as mentioned heretofore until such time as insects might appear. If one. wants to keep the smoked hams for any length of time they should be securely covered with canvas and either white washed or packed in bran or oats. The room where cured meats are kept should be as cool and as dark as possible. CHAPTER XXVII HOG CHOLERA AND SERUM During the last few years we have made it a practice to keep the entire herd immune by the simultaneous treatment. In the summer of 1913 we immunized 219 pigs at one time, using the sim- ultaneous treatment, and the loss was about two per cent. This leads me to believe that our government authorities and others who have been instrumental in working out the simultaneous serum treatment, have in it the long-sought-for specific treatment for the prevention of hog cholera. I am convinced, however that many have not fully understood this method of hog cholera treatment, and as I had been much attracted to and pleased with an article by J. L. Thatcher, I re- quested Mr. Thatcher to furnish a serum article for this book, and take great pleasure in giving him full credit for the excellent service he has rendered swine breeders by his contribution to hog cholera literature. Mr. Thatcher's article which follows, is com- mended to the thoughtful attention of every reader of this book, with the -hope that the serum treatment will be better understood and more generally followed. I firmly believe that if his sug- gestions were properly carried out in time we could stamp out this dread disease: In accepting the invitation of the author of this book to write on hog cholera and its prevention by the serum-simultaneous method of treatment, I did so with the idea that I could talk as one breeder to another, and with the hope that what may be said may lead) to a more active and persistent campaign against a disease that, judging by the results attained at lowana Farms, and elsewhere where the treatment has been given a fair and intelligent trial, can be prevented and ultimately wiped out. Apart from the purely elementary scientific statements that are made in order to give a clearer understanding of the nature of hog cholera as a disease, of what is meant by immunity, and of the process followed in obtaining serum, the statements made and the conclusions drawn are based entirely upon our work with registered swine. They show what we have accomplished and the policy we have permanently adopted in preventing the disease. The results have been very gratifying to us, and have enabled us to prevent the enormous loss which almost inevitably follows when a hog cholera epidemic strikes . a herd. If our experience, with the results attained and the conclusions drawn, can be of benefit to the swine breeders of the country, we are glad to make known what we have done, and to do our part towards stamping out a disease that is annually causing the loss of tens of millions of dollars throughout the United States. The prevention of hog cholera, and through its prevention the control and ultimate eradication of the disease, is the most urgent and financially vital problem which confronts swine breeders and farmers throughout the entire country today. Losses Due to Disease. Now when we consider that fully 90 per cent, of the hogs that die from disease die from hog cholera, we can readily gain some idea of the magnitude of the losses we are annually sustaining through this disease alone, and of the imperative need for a nation-wide 88 HOG CHOLERA AND SERUM 89 campaign against this scourge in which not only breeders and farmers, but state and national authorities themselves shall join, fighting continu- ously and persistenly with the end in view that in, say ten years, our entire country may be declared practically cholera free. The financial losses sustained through the loss of pork hogs alone ia, however, only one phase of the proposition. The progressive, business farmer no longer follows the practice of looking for his annual profits through the sale of grain crops. Bather he looks for his gain through the raising and sale of live stock. He needs the manure to maintain the fertility of his soil, and he is appreciative of the fact that a bushel of corn that sells for fifty cents on the market, will bring him one dollar when disposed of in the form of pork. Further this same farmer realizes, or is beginning to realize, the greater returns to be gained from the breeding and raising of pure-bred stock, and he is constantly endeavoring to improve his herds by the introduction of pure-bred, registered animals. Yet it matters little how successful one may become as a breeder of improved hogs, or in the building up of his herd, as a feeder if he is to be at the mercy of hog cholera epidemics, and is constantly con- fronted by a condition that may in the space of a few days wipe out his entire herd, destroy utterly the results of years of work and study in selective breeding, and with it all inflict upon him a loss that in many cases reaches into the thousands of dollars. Concerted Action. Even a casual consideration of the facts given above will show the absolute necessity of some definite, effective, concerted action which can and will stay the ravages of this disease and work to its final elimination. And particularly is this so when there is no longer any question that the trouble can be controlled. Up until within the past few years hog cholera has been one of the stubborn diseases to respond to treatment. Although the whole pharma- copeia has been searched for a specific cure, no such cure has ever been discovered. Many so-called remedies have been boasted and boosted, but not one of them has ever proved efiieacious when an emergency arose. Even proper feeding, proper housing and sanitary surroundings, though essential in maintaining animals in a healthy condition and rendering them more able to fight disease, have not proved a safeguard against cholera infection. And on the contrary, it might be added, that there ia no condition or set of conditions, even improper care and feeding of hogs, that will bring on cholera infection without the presence of the living cholera germ. A Contagious Disease. Hog cholera is characteristically a contagious disease and is caused by a living germ that develops and multiplies in the body of the animal and produces a poison fatal to life. Even though scientists have thus far, because of inadequate equipment, been unable to identify the particular bug that causes the havoc, the proof of its ex- istence lies in the fact that if a few drops of blood from a cholera infected hog be injected into the system of one not so infected, the blood of the latter animal will become as thoroughly impregnated with cholera virus as was that of the former. This condition, however, would not and could not obtain if the blood of the original animal did not contain a living, active organism. An inactive or dead foreign substance injected into the blood of the second hog could not multiply or increase in quantity. The discovery in this instance, as in the cases of all contagious or infectious diseases, of the origin or cause of the disease marked the first steps toward the prevention and control of hog cholera, and thanks to the investigations and activities of our Department of Agriculture and our Experimental Stations, we have, I am firmly convinced, an absolute method of preventing the disease and of bringing about its complete eradication. In my mind it is no longer a question of how to prevent hog cholera, but rather is it one of how to provide the proper means under efficient supervision and regulation, and then to get the farmers to use them. 90 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN It may have been noticed that no claim has been made that a cure for this disease has been discovered. Our hope for its control lies in its prevention rather than in its cure, and this brings us to the discussion of the serum method of treatment, which is distinctly preventive rather than curative in its nature. Success in fighting hog cholera lies in warding it off rather than in overcoming it after the animals have become diseased. Method of Procedure. To understand this method of procedure it is essential that one has in mind a clear idea of what is meant by immunity. It is common knowledge that when a person has once recovered from an attack of certain contagious diseases he is thereafter less liable to respond to a second attack of those same diseases, and this holds with other animals as well as with human beings. Such individuals, whether persona or other animals, are said to be immune to those particular infections. What this immunity consists in is still under debate, I believe, but whatever its nature it is very clear that those animals possess a resisting power they did not possess previous to the first attack of the disease. Scientists tell us that all disease-producing germs or bacteria develop certain toxins or poisons which acting upon the body cells and nerve centers tend to cause death. At the same time that this invasion is going on nature, in her attempt to save life, begins the manufacture of a counter-acting substance, called anti-toxin, the function of which is the destruction of the living, death-producing microbes and thus stay or limit the progress of the disease. There is, therefore, being carried on within the system of the infected animal a life and death struggle between these two opposing forces, the toxin and the anti-toxin, and the ultimate success of the one or the other means either the death or the recovery of the hog. In the large majority of cases, however, the body becomes so thorough impregnated with the poisonous germs that the anti-toxin cannot be developed rapidly enough and hence the animal dies. If, on the other hand, the animal has at the beginning an unusual or sufficient amount of native resisting power, or the infection be not of the more virulent nature, recovery takes place and thereafter the animal is con- sidered, and is in reality, immune. It is from the blood of these immune hogs that the serum is secured, which, when injected into the systems of other hogs, renders them like- wise immune to the attacks of hog cholera. Ordinarily, however, the blood of these merely immune hogs contains only enough anti-toxin to protect the animals themselves against the disease, and thus the serum from the blood of such animals, in small doses, would not be effective in immunizing other animals. This necessi- tates the production of what is known as a state of hyper-immunization in the hogs from which the serum is to be taken. Hyper-immunization is produced by giving to an already immune hog large doses of cholera virus, thus causing the blood of the animal to become so saturated with anti-toxin that small doses of serum from his blood may be successfully used in immunizing other hogs. Preparing Serum. The method of preparing the serum may be briefly stated as follows: Either a hog is procured that has recovered from an attack of hog cholera, or more frequently, such an immune hog is artificially produced by injecting him with a small dose of virus obtained from an acute case of the disease, while at the same time -he is injected with a protective dose of serum. Thus an immunity is established. Then one of two methods may be employed. Either several successively increasing doses of virus may be given at intervals of about a week apart, or one extraordinarily large dose may be given at one time. Either of these methods is effective, but that of giving the one large dose has the advantage in the point of time saved. From a week to ten days after the last injection of virus the animal is bled from the tail, about a pint of blood being drawn from a hog weighing one hundred pounds. The blood so drawn is allowed to clot and the clot is then strained under pressure, and the resulting serum HOG CHOLERA AND SERUM 91 is given sufficient of a five per cent solution of carbolic acid so that ultimately it contains one-half of one per cent of carbolic acid, this being for the purpose of increasing its keeping qualities. This bleeding process is repeated at least twice at intervals a week apart, the whole being then mixed to give a uniformity of product. It should then be tested by practical experiment to determine its potency before being sent out and is then ready for use. If properly prepared, the serum is undoubtedly effective in immunizing against cholera when used in doses of 20 to 25 CC for hogs weighing 100 pounds, with doses of 15 CC extra for each successive 100 pounds of live weight of hog. In warding off or preventing cholera by use of serum one of two methods may be employed. First, by the injection of serum alone under the skin or into the muscles of the animal. This is known as the simple serum method and gives only temporary immunity, say for about thirty days. The sec- ond method, known as the simultaneous method, consists in the injection of the same amount of serum, but at the same time a small amount of cholera virus, from 1 to 2 CC, according to the age and size of the animal, is also injected into the animal being treated. The second method produces what is known as active immunity, and is permanent in its char- acter, lasting during the period of the animal's life. Which ever method is employed certain essentials must be absolutely insisted upon if any degree of success is to follow the work; and particularly in the simultaneous method must this be so if disastrous results are to be avoided. Essentials. First, the serum and virus used must be pure and potent; and second, the person treating the hogs must know his business thor- oughly that is, he must be able to k-noio hog cholera when he sees it, he must know which method to employ under the given or existing con- ditions, and he must understand how to do the work. Failure in the observation of these requirements will explain why there are still so many breeders and farmers who doubt or question the efficacy of the serum treatment and hesitate in its use. To secure the proper kind of serum and virus it is necessary that all serum and virus should be tested to determine their potency before they are sent out for use, and this by expert supervision under state or federal control. Ample means and equipment for their manufacture should be provided so that when emergencies arise and the demand for serum and virus becomes large and urgent the calls could be met and the product sent out would be pure and potent. This comes within the business of the state. To be sure there are numerous commercial plants manufacturing serum and virus, but these likewise should be brought under state or national supervision to insure the excellence of their product. That the work of treating hogs should be done by one thoroughly ac- quainted with the disease and competent to give the treatment should go without saying, when one considers the importance of the undertaking and the magnitude of the losses that may result if failure follows. Which Method? Which method of treatment should be used must be determined by existing conditions. Where an outbreak has already occurred and it is desired to treat the remaining apparently well animals the simple serum method should be employed, for it is very probable that many, if not all, of the animals so injected have become previously infected and the treatment will result in permanent or active immunity. The use of cholera virus on hogs that have already become infected or are other- wise diseased is simply adding to their troubles and will almost invariably result in the death of the animal. Further, the simple serum method only should be used in treating brood soics in pregnancy, even though the treat- ment may have to be repeated to carry them on through farrowing and until their pigs are old enough to wean, and then both sows and piga should be given the simultaneous treatment. The simultaneous method should always be used where permanent immunity is desired, and especially so whenever the animals are to be placed in lots or houses in which cholera outbreaks have previously occurred. 92 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN As to the efficacy of the simultaneous treatment, where the serum and virus are right and are properly given, to produce immunity and thus permanently prevent the ravages of hog cholera there is in my mind absolutely no question. That it can be done has been proved time and time again. To be sure there are numerous cases where serum has been used with no apparent effect, and the simultaneous treatment has been given in order to gain permanent immunity, that results have been deadly and almost entire herds have been lost. But careful investigation, and thorough analysis of the serum used have proved, or would have proved, that where the simultaneous method was employed the simple serum treatment only should have been used, and in both cases the serum itself had lost part if not all its potency. My Own Experience.: In May, 1911, with 172 head of hogs, young and old, on hand, cholera broke out in our herd. We immediately began the use of serum, injecting not only the hogs already sick with the disease, but also those that had been exposed. The effect of the treatment was to check the progress of the disease, and our losses were confined to those animals that had become badly infected before the serum was used. We came out of the siege with 127 animals, having lost forty-five eight mature hogs and thirty-seven pigs. Compare these results with those of one of our neighbors whose herd was attacked by cholera shortly after our herd became infected. He had 165 animals, young and old, at the beginning, and he came out of his trouble with only five head remaining two sows and three pigs. He did not believe in the serum treatment or in its virtue as a preventive. Note the comparative results and draw your own conclusions. This outbreak of cholera in our own herd led us to adopt the policy of permanently immunizing every animal. Those that had recovered from the disease were already immune. Those that had never shown sickness, even though they had previously been given the simple serum, were sub- jected to the simultaneous treatment. This practice we rigidly adhere to. All young pigs from immune parents, before being weaned, and all new stock brought into the herd, unless we are positive it has already been treated, are likewise given the simultaneous treatment. And in giving the treatment we have never lost a single animal as a result of such treatment, and up to the present time we have treated upwards of 1,300 animals. In this, however, we have been singularly fortunate. Sta- tistics show that ordinarily a loss of from two to five per cent of the animals treated may be looked for. But even this is insignificant when compared with losses that commonly follow an outbreak where the treat- ment is not employed. Applying the Treatment. Our method of procedure in giving the simultaneous treatment may explain in part the reason for our freedom from loss following its application. In beginning the work of immunizing our herd we gave each animal a regular dose of simple serum alone. This was given as a preparatory treatment. Fourteen (14) days later we gave each animal thus treated the double or simultaneous treatment, using the virus and the regular amount of serum. The preparatory treatment paved the way for the simultaneous treatment 14 days later, and rendered the animal better able to stand the latter treatment. In treating pigs whose parents are immune, we give the simultaneous treatment at once, and without the preparatory dose. We usually treat our pigs about two weeks before we wean them. Hogs and pigs being treated should be given a clean, dry place to house in, plenty of cool, clean water, and all heating and heavy feeds should be discontinued for a couple of weeks. In case any animal, given the simultaneous treatment, is not doing well as a result of the treatment, give it another, a double dose of simple serum. This will help carry it through the fight. While we recognize that the giving of the above so-called preparatory dose of simple serum doubles the cost of immunizing hogs and pigs, yet HOG CHOLERA AND SERUM 93 the total absence from loss of animals by such practice fully justifies, in our minds, the added expense thus incurred. And especially is this true where the treatment is being given to pure-bred, registered stock. Our observations in treating breeding stock have led us to adopt the following practice: We never give the simultaneous treatment to bred sows, nor do we breed sows within two or three weeks after treating them. Further, boars just treated should not be put into immediate serv- ice. Time should be allowed for the immediate after effects of the treatment to wear off the animals to regain their normal and active condition. Results of Treatment. The results of our experience in following out this practice have removed from our minds all fear of cholera epidemics. We do not hesitate to move animals from one house or lot to another even though we know that the latter may have contained hogs that had had cholera and are known to be thoroughly infected with cholera germs. And we have never had an animal become infected by such handling. Further, we do not fear to introduce new hogs into our herd regardless of where they may come from. During the entire show seasons of 1912 and 1913 none of our hogs were troubled with the disease, and after the fairs were over we did not hesitate to return our show animals immediately back into the lots with our other hogs. Further Tests. We have carried our tests still farther to prove the efficacy of the simultaneous treatment in producing permanent or active immunity. This was done to demonstrate to the breeders and farmers of this locality how cholera epidemics could be prevented. In August, 1912, one of our young barrows was placed in a herd of hogs in which an outbreak of cholera had occurred. He remained there fifty-five days without contracting the disease and then was brought back and placed again among our own hogs. The second of January, 1913, we sent out three other barrows to be put among hogs that were dying from cholera. These three barrows re- mained among those sick hogs for more than six weeks, eating and sleeping with them, but not one of the three became infected or showed any ill effects from the rigid test under which they had been placed. Further, at the International Live Stock Exposition in Chicago in 1912 the writer purchased six choice gilts to be shipped us and placed in our breeding herd. Knowing the infected condition of the Union Stock Yards, it was stipulated that those gilts be given the simultaneous treatment before shipment. Through oversight on the part of the man left in charge of the animals they were not given the treatment, and were shipped immediately after the close of the Exposition and were placed at once among the other animals of our herd which numbered at that time something over 240 hogs and pigs. Only a very few days elapsed after their arrival before those gilts showed distinct evidences of cholera infection. Three of the animals had become so badly infected that it was impossible to save them. The others we were fortunate in pulling through by a liberal injection of serum. The important point in connection with this incident is this: Though all of those six gilts had the cholera, and three of them died from the disease, yet not one of the 240 immune animals among which they were placed, and with which they had been eating and sleeping, became infected, or have we seen any evidence or trace of cholera among our animals since, and this was over a year ago. Such tests as these are our warrant for the conclusions we have reached that hog cholera can be prevented, and by its prevention be completely eradicated. And the results we have attained are being repeated by numerous other breeders who have adopted the system of simultaneously treating their animals and have given the method fair and intelligent handling. Immunizing a "Business Policy. With us the permanent immunizing of our hogs is a business proposition pure and simple. The cost is strictly an investment in the way of the purchase of protection that will insure against losses that might reach into the thousands of dollars if we were not BO protected. 94 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN An important point which should be mentioned is the possibility of carrying, or the transmission of, cholera infection from herds, in which the simultaneous method of treatment is employed, to herds which are not immune. For the past year and a half we have shipped hogs and pigs to every section of the United States, and we have as yet to learn of the first instance where any infection has been carried from our herd to other herds, even though those herds had not been given the simultaneous treatment. And further, we have as yet to hear of the first case where herds in our own locality have become infected because of our practice of employing the simultaneous treatment to immunize our animals. It is advisable, however, that care should be taken where hogs are being shipped from herds in which the simultaneous method is used, and especially so when they are being sent into sections where the animals are not immune. Animals just treated should be held several weeks before shipment, and in all cases they should be thoroughly disinfected before being sent out. Upon being received by the purchaser they should be held in quarantine for about thirty days. Observation of the above pre- cautions should remove all possibility of trouble. Each Man Must Decide for Self. Whether or not a breeder of hogs should adopt the policy of simultaneously treating his animals, and thus establishing and maintaining a permanent immune herd, is for each breeder himself to determine. Situated as we are, in the center of the great swine producing section of the country, where hog cholera outbreaks are con- stantly occurring, and hog cholera germs are with us practically all of the time, this method of treatment is our only salvation, and affords the only means by which we can check and prevent the disease. For breeders, who live in sections of the country where the disease seldom occurs, and who are not bringing in stock from cholera infested districts, the need for immediate action is not so imperative. But those breeders who do not adopt the practice of permanently immunizing their herds, and follow this up by likewise immunizing their young stock as it comes along each year, should be ever on the alert, and when an out-break of cholera does occur in their locality they should at once get in touch with their state authorities, and active and persistent steps be taken to check the progress of the disease. Unfortunately, many of our states have not as yet provided ample facilities for the production of proper serum and virus to meet the demand when hog cholera becomes epidemic. Under these circumstances breeders are forced to depend upon commercial concerns for their supplies. It is in helping the breeder to get pure and potent serum and virus that the state and federal authorities can be of greatest assistance. Every plant manufacturing these supplies should be under constant state or federal supervision, and every bottle of serum and virus sent out should bear the stamp of the government inspector. This would in effect place all serum and virus on a recognized standard basis as to their purity and potency, and would insure to the farmer and breeder the quality of the article they were getting. Then steps should be taken by the state author- ities to see that the serum and virus are administered by men who know their business and have license to do the work. While the simultaneous method of treatment affords a means of check- ing and eliminating hog cholera, in districts or sections of the country where it has become prevelant, every precaution should be taken to pre- vent its being carried into other sections or states not so infected. A law should be passed making it a misdemeanor to sell a bunch of sick hogs. A law should be passed requiring the railroad companies to disinfect each stock car after it has taken a load of hogs to market, and every public stock yard should be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected at stated intervals. Further, a law is needed, and should be enacted by the federal government, requiring a certificate of health for a hog before he can be shipped from one state to another. These are precautionary measures which are needed and which can and will do much towards preventing the spreading of the disease. CHAPTER XXVIII COMMON DISEASES Worms. The question of worms in pigs is one of greater importance than many breeders and farmers realize. The presence of worms in the stomach is not only a hindrance to thrift and growth, but if neglected, becomes a very dangerous matter, as the worms multiply very rapidly and are a constant drain on the vital- ity of the pig. Often they become so numerous in good sized shotes that they form almost a solid mass in the intestines, which results in emaciation of the pig and finally death. It is a question in my mind if more pigs do not die from stomach worms during the fall and winter months than from cholera. It should be the practice of every farmer and also of every breeder of pure-bred hogs to feed something throughout the life of the pig as a preventive or a destroyer of worms. There are many medicated salts on the market, most of them good, and these pre- parations have proven, with us at least, successful in either prevent- ing worms entirely or keeping the trouble down so much that we have never had any difficulty with worms. Even when feeding something of this kind, however, one will occasionally see the pass- ing of worms from the pigs. Any worm powder that contains the proper amount of Santonin is good, and where the use of medicated salts is not quite sufficient, let the owner at once get a prescription from a veterinarian which will clean them out. Young hogs that are badly infected with stomach worms will have a very unthrifty appearance; the coat will be dry and "staring"; the head rather drooping as in cholera ; the back arched ; the pig coughing more or less, and becoming more emaciated every day, with little appetite. Another species of worms that bother young hogs and pigs is what is known as thread worms, which form in bunches or large quantities in the throat and often about the lungs, causing a severe cough and much emaciation. These can usually be readily cleaned out by giving a couple of tablespoons of turpentine to each three hundred pounds of live weight, in the slop every day for three days, then skipping a day or two and using it again for three days. It must be remembered that when you are doctoring a pig for worms with medicine of any kind, it should be given on an empty stomach, or in other words, after the pig has been kept from feed about eighteen hours, otherwise the turpentine or worm medicine would have little or no effect. These species of worms are the only two with which I have ever had any experience during our many years of breeding pigs, and they never caused me any trouble whatever, as we are always on the alert for worm symptoms. 95 96 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN The eye of the feeder is one of the great things in the hog busi- ness. The man who feeds the pigs should take interest enough in his work to carefully note the condition of each animal daily, and if there is ever so small a change in the animal, by way of being a little ''off feed," he must at once find out what the trouble is, whether it is an over feed from the day before, or a little indisposi- tion from conditions which, unless promptly attended to, might lead to serious trouble. The old adage that a " Stitch in time saves nine" was never more true than in the care of swine. Why Young Pigs Lose Their Tails. One often notices when looking over a number of litters, especially of Spring pigs that were farrowed during the cold months of February and March, that a number of them have lost their tails. This condition is caused wholly by neglecting to provide dry beds for the sow and litter. I do not mean by this that an occasional change of bedding, once every week or two would prevent it, but that the bed of the young nursing litter must be absolutely dry at all times, and to make it such it should be changed at least every other day. Otherwise the bed will become damp and the mother and litter will heat it so that it soon commences to steam, and if you should put your hand on the straw you will find it hot and wet. This will surely cause their little tails to shrivel and in a week or so drop off. If you notice a pig among your litter of youngsters that shows a little crease or crack around the tail within an inch or a half inch of the body, while the rest of the tail seems dry and dead, you may make up your mind that it will be a bobbed tail pig in a mighty short time. If the trouble has not gone too far, it may be over- come by cleaning the tail where the crack appears, with peroxide of hydrogen, which disinfects and purifies the sore parts, and if this is applied two or three. times daily, and afterward the place rubbed with carbolated vaseline, if the case is not too bad, the tail may be saved. Of course the matter of bobbed tail pigs "cuts little ice" where the hogs are being raised for the pork market, but the loss of the tail greatly disfigures an otherwise outstanding show animal. While the average judge would not turn down an animal in the show ring for lack of a good tail and nice switch or brush, he would very much prefer that the disfigurement was not there. Thumps in Young Pigs. Thumps in very young pigs often occur where litters are farrowed in the colder months of the Spring or Winter. While there is no trouble in saving the litter if proper- ly handled, there is danger of the young litter becoming too fat, particularly through the shoulders and front half of the body. This is caused by their not taking proper exercise, and receiving too great a flow of rich milk from the mother. In this case they always become extremely fat, especially about the heart and vital organs of the body, and so thicken up that it is almost impossible for the little fellows to breathe even while lying quietly in the nest, and when this stage becomes apparent it means almost sure death to the pigs if they are forced to take exercise ; hence it is ex- COMMON DISEASES 97 tremely important that if a litter is farrowed when it is cold and they are inclined to stay in the nest all day, they must be made to hustle out and take exercise enough to keep them from getting too fat. This condition will be very quickly noticed by an observing man who looks after the sow and litter. If the sow is a good milker there is all the more danger. In this case it would be well to feed the sow, for two or three weeks, on a ration that would not produce so much milk. This would be a great help in keeping down the trouble, but the pigs should be made to take plenty of exercise daily before any such condition appears. There are several ways of compelling this exercise. One is to take the litter some distance from the sleeping place or nest and put them on the ground and let them work their way back. It makes no difference how far .this distance is, if you are sure they will get back to the nest. If this custom is followed daily you will lose no pigs from so-called thumps. Another plan is to take the pigs out of the nest and get after them with a broom and if they will not run away from you, force them to do so, by pushing them along. Any system is all right that will compel lots of exercise. Pleura-Pneumonia. There is another trouble one often runs up against when he walks out among his pigs in the fall, or in fact at almost any time. He finds a half-grown animal, or even a ma- ture one, breathing short and fast with a perceptible jerk in the flank and back of the heart along the shoulders. This is a pretty sure symptom of serious trouble, and is generally an unfailing sign of what is known as Swine Plague, or what would be called, in the human race, Pneumonia. This is a dangerous disease and is one of the "so-called" varieties of hog cholera and is really more dangerous. There is little that can be done with hogs in this con- dition. They should be given a warm, dry place to sleep, thorough- ly rubbed with some strong heating liniment, that is penetrating, all along the sides ; back of the elbow ; between the fore legs ; all about the vital organs ; then, if in a shivering condition, cover them with blankets or something to keep them warm, and keep them where no draft or cold air can strike them. It would be well, in a severe case, to consult the family physician or a good Veterinarian with a view of giving them some internal treatment. The animals will appear very gaunt and probably refuse to eat. If this is the case there is not much hope. Exercise in this case is always fatal. Sore Mouths. Some breeders and farmers often have trouble with sore mouths among their pigs. There are two kinds of sore mouth that we have had experience with neither of which need cause any trouble whatever. The more common cases are caused by the pigs fighting each other while nursing, and with their little sharp tusks (which are usually black), they strike each other on the sides of the face and jowl. This trouble can be stopped at once 98 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN by taking the pig, when it is three or four days old, and nipping off these little tusks with a very small pair of pliers, and washing the sore part of the face with a solution of any good coal tar dip. This trouble could be avoided if one was careful to note, while the litter was sucking, whether or not there was any inclination for the little fellows to fight each other. Canker Sore Mouth. Canker sore mouth is very dangerous, and unless treated at once, a hard thing to cure ; but what little we have had in our herd has been stopped in a day or two by using a soft cloth, wet in a solution of good dip (made quite strong) and thoroughly washing the mouth of the pig affected. If this is done daily, or even every two or three days, for three or four times, it will absolutely cure canker sore month or at least it has done so in all cases we have had. If treatment is not commenced within a short time after the cankers are formed, the teeth will drop out and gums slough off and the pig die from the trouble. Canker sore month, I am informed, results from the contamina- tion with germs often found even in the soil; if there has been no other way of the disease being communicated, the ground should be thoroughly wet with a strong disinfectant. The sow 's udder should also be thoroughly washed with disinfectant and the trough as well, and no further trouble is likely to occur. Sore Feet. It is not often that pigs are troubled with sore feet, yet sometimes, where they are kept and fed on frozen ground, the feet become sore and sensitive, which causes the pig to walk in a very peculiar manner. This is more often the case where hogs are very heavy and are obliged to walk on rough, hard or frozen ground. There are occasionally cases where sores break out around the hoof and between the toes. This is what might be called ' * foul in the foot," but is not considered contagious, being only a local trouble which irritates the part between the toes. Sometimes this is caused by being obliged to walk about a yard that is filled with cinders; these get between the toes and cause irritation. If such a yard is being used it would be well to cover the places over with sand and wet it thoroughly with a disinfectant. If an animal becomes very lame wash the place two or three times daily with nitrate of potassium saltpetre and this will cool the irritated parts and relieve the trouble. Should proud flesh appear use chloride of zinc, one dram in a pint of water, once or twice daily. Keep the pigs in a dry place and feed them well. Proud flesh may be known by its appearance, which is bluish in color and spongy to the touch. This may be removed by an ap- plication of terchloride of antimony, which may be put on with a feather. This will usually remove proud flesh, after which the above treatment will heal the sores. Sterility. Generally speaking, there is not much trouble in the swine breeding business along this line, unless it be among highly fitted show animals, which have been forced by stimulating feed to a condition of flesh that is abnormal. Where this is the case, the COMMON DISEASES 99 animal becomes so plethoric from being highly fed, that sometimes the tubes connected with the organs of generation are blocked up. There are also other causes, such as disordered ovaries; a morbid condition of the uterus ; or hardening of the neck of the uterus. In a pig, on account of not being able to make an examination, it is difficult to find the cause and, if found, it would be difficult to re- move. If the animal is kept in only good growing condition, avoiding its getting too fat, there will seldom be any trouble. If the sow takes on fat very easily, and will not breed, give her two ounces of Ep- som Salts, dissolved in half a pint of cold water; follow this with ten grains of Iodide of Potassium twice a day, in her feed, for two weeks. By this treatment one may succeed in absorbing the ma- terials which have blocked up some of the tubes connected with the organs of generation. On the other hand, if an animal is very thin and in a weak, run-down condition, and fails to breed, give her good feed all she will eat and with this twenty to forty drops, according to size of animal, of tincture of chloride of iron, twice a day in the feed. Rheumatism. Rheumatism is very common among pigs ; more particularly among quite young ones. It is hard to say what causes rheumatism in the pigs, as we often find it under various condi- tions whether the animals are well kept or not. Symptoms Lameness in one or more of the legs ; swelling of the hock joints or the fetlock joint. When these muscles are affected it may be a form of inflammatory rheumatism, which may cause some fever and sickness. In this case the animal would be stiff and refuse to eat ; its breath will come quite short and fast ; muz- zle, or nose, will be dry, and if the animal is made to move about it will show signs of pain. Often it will shift from one leg to an- other. Treatment The animal should be kept in a warm, comfortable place and if it is in good flesh give it a dose of from one to two ounces Epsom Salts every three or four days, or two to three, drops of Croton oil, which is a useful medicine in rheumatism. For pigs, two or three months old, give half the quantity. It is well to rub the swollen joints with an equal mixture of turpentine and sweet oil. Inflammation of Udder. "While this is not considered a dis- ease, at times it causes some trouble but not often. Causes Usually this is caused by an over accumulation of milk in the udder which is the result of overfeeding the sow on rich feed immediately after farrowing, or caused by the litter being too few in number or too weak to take all the milk that the sow furnish- es, resulting in a feverish condition and soreness of the udder. Symptoms Udder becomes swollen and rather hard, and is hot to the touch. The skin will become red and very tender. When this is the case the sow usually shows considerable fever, loss of ap- petite and constipation. Treatment. If possible, draw off the milk, although this is a hard matter to do as the inflammation causes the milk to coagulate. 100 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN If the pigs are living allow them to nurse, yet this is bad for the pigs, as that usually starts the ailment in new born pigs known as white scours. Bathe the udder carefully with hot water, then use a half ounce of acetate of lead, with two ounces of tincture of arni- ca in one quart of warm water. This bathing should be done three times a day and the lotion applied after each bath. Give the sow two ounces of Epsom salts, followed with ten grains of nitrate of potassium, in a little water three times a day. If the udder be- comes very hard or caked, rub with one dram of Iodine and one ounce of vaseline. Apply this about twice a week until the udder becomes soft and pliable. Sore Teats. Once in a while, while nursing, the teats will become inflamed and swollen and, of course, are very sore. The sow will be inclined to refuse to let the pigs touch her. This only makes matters worse, on account of the accumulation of milk in the udder, and the result is a fever as above mentioned. Cause. This trouble is generally caused by the udder and teats dragging through the dirt or mud which irritates the skin, making it crack and become sore. It is also caused by the sow having trav- eled through poisonous weeds in the pasture, while wet with dew or rain. Treatment. Bathe three times a day with half an ounce acetate of lead in a quart of warm water. Then bathe with two ounces glycerine and tannic acid twenty grains in four ounces of water well shaken. Skin Diseases. About the only skin disease that one is liable to have occasion to treat, is mange. This is caused by a parasite that burrows under the scurf skin and causes great irritation, prac- tically destroying that part of the skin, so that a little scab forms. This, on account of great itching, causes the animal to rub and this disease soon becomes general throughout the herd. The scabs formed are rubbed and soon become a raw sore. The first appear- ance will be found on the thin parts of the skin ; back of the ears ; inside the thighs or upon the back. The parasite may be readily seen with a pocket magnifying glass. When first discovered remove all unaffected pigs to buildings or grounds where affected pigs have not been. Treatment. First wash the pig all over with soap-suds, and then rub in dry sulphur. The sulphur coming in contact with the sores forms a compound that is poisonous to the parasite. Another sure remedy is to steep two ounces of stavesacre seeds in one and one-half quarts of water. Keep water nearly boiling for an hour, then add enough water to make up the quantity originally placed in the vessel. This solution, rubbed well into the skin, will kill both the parasite and its eggs. This may be repeated if necessary. Animals that are occasionally dipped with any of the coal tar preparations will never have mange. Prevention is better than cure. This is one reason why pigs should be either dipped or thoroughly wet with some of the foregoing dips as a preventive to any skin trouble. CHAPTER XXIX CASTRATING This is a necessary matter that must be looked after, not only by the farmer who breeds for the general market, but by the breeder of pure-bred hogs as well. The best time for this opera- tion is during the early period of the pig's life and at weaning time, for best results, and not left until the pig is six or seven months of age, or older. It is not so apt to be neglected by the farmer or feeder of market hogs, as by the breeder of pure-breds. It is astonishing, however, in either case, to see the great improve- ment after early castration, compared to a pig of the same litter left uncastrated. Some of the greatest barrows ever shown at the International Show in Chicago were selected, not so much for their, superior merit at weaning time, but because they were not quite up to the standard to carry on and sell as breeders ; yet after this op- eration their development so far outstripped the litter mates that there was no comparison. On the other hand, how often we see especially at shows where a large amount of money is put up for prizes a barrow that really is nothing more nor less than a ' ' stag, ' ' and evidently kept by the breeder for a long time, thinking he could be sold for a breeder, but not developing just right, he was finally castrated and fitted for a barrow show. The expert barrow Judge, however, soon discovers this fact and avoids much further attention to him in the ring. A Practical Method. Wash the parts clean with pure water to which has been added any good coal tar dip, making it rather strong, and with a sharp knife make an incision over both testicles as small as possible, to remove the testicles, and low down, so as to drain thoroughly. Press the testicles through the openings, drawing the cords well out, and scrape apart rather than cut them off. Then, with a soft cloth, cover the parts with full strength coal tar dip, and if the operation has been perfectly clean, the pig will be entirely well in a week or so, without any bad after-effects. Spaying 1 . This is an operation on the female and is not often practiced. In fact, I seldom hear of a bunch of sows being spayed. It is an operation that requires much more care and knowledge, than castration of males. 101 PROF. JOHN M. EWARD HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS BY JOHN M. EVVARD PART II CHAPTER I WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE RATION It is no easy matter to compound a successful ration on paper ; in truth, it is almost impossible to do so without having had consider- able experience with the different feeds and also having at hand a more complete analysis than is ordinarily given us by the chemist. To illustrate that one of our greatest feeds, for instance corn, is woefully incomplete in itself, it may be well to mention a recent ex- perimental test by the Animal Husbandry Section of the Iowa Ex- periment Station in which we fed three groups of pigs in dry lots as follows : Group A: Shelled corn, self -fed, plus block salt, self-fed. Group B : Shelled corn, self -fed, plus bone mate- rial, self-fed, plus block salt, self- fed. Group C : Shelled corn, self -fed, plus meat meal tankage (60 per cent protein), self- fed, plus block salt, self -fed. The pigs were started out at the nice weanling weight of prac- tically 42 pounds, and were fed 150 days. They were more than 71/2 months of age at the close of the test. The pigs receiving corn only in separate feeders made an average daily gain of .1 of a pound, consuming per head daily 1.56 pounds of shelled corn, in addition to a little salt. They weighed at the end of the feeding period, when they were practically 8 months of age, 57.34 pounds. Think of it ! Pigs weighing 57 pounds when 8 months old. What is the trouble ? Is it with corn ? Hardly, because corn is a healthful feed. The big difficulty was that some other things should have been provided in the ration that were not, and these should have been such as would have supplemented the deficiencies of corn. On this corn ration it took 1,446 pounds of corn to produce 100 pounds of gain, and, in addition to this, a little more than 2 pounds of salt a total of 1,448 pounds of feed for every 100 pounds of gain put on. Now the addition of bonemeal which carries a little protein with it helps some. The pigs gained 50 percent more or .15 of a pound 103 104 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS daily, and they had little better appetites, eating practically 2 pounds of grain per head daily and required 1.297 pounds of corn plus 10 pounds of bone meal plus 1 pound of salt for 100 pounds of gain, a total of 1308 pounds of feed approximate- ly. There was still something wrong because eight-months-old pigs at the close should weigh more than these weighed, or, namely, more than 65 pounds. The addition of 60 percent protein meatmeal tankage made a vast difference. The pigs gained 12 times as fast as where they re- ceived corn alone, making more gains in one day than the corn-alone pigs made in 12, or 1.21 pounds daily. Also they ate three times as much feed, or 4.40 pounds of corn plus .58 of a pound of tankage plus a little salt a total of almost 5 pounds, or, to be exact, 4.98 pounds ; requiring for each 100 pounds of gain 366 pounds of corn, plus 47 pounds of tankage, plus a little more than .1 of a pound of salt, or, practically speaking, 413 pounds of feed for every 100 pounds of gain. These pigs weighed 226 pounds at the same age as the corn-alone pigs or the corn-and-bonemeal pigs, or 226 as compared to 57 and 65 pounds, respectively. Certainly there must be something in meatmeal tankage that supplies the deficiencies of corn ; there must also be something in the corn and salt ration that is inadequate. To study this matter more fully, let us consider what we mean by a complete ration, a ration that is adequate, particularly for growing pigs and suckling sows with litters. A Complete Ration. A complete ration is relatively complex. It is made up of many factors, many of these are unknown chem- ically, unfortunately, although we know their action. Chemical analyses, therefore, although difficult to make, are, ordinarily speaking, only to be considered as general guides. Why this is so we shall make plain shortly. Feeds vary considerably, particularly pasture feeds. Young bluegrass, for instance, may come out in the early spring running as high as 40 percent protein in the young dry matter ; and later it may contain only 10 percent of protein in the old dry matter; that is, after it becomes dry, hard and woody. This protein in the mature plant is certainly not the same as the protein in the young, tender, luscious green growth. There are proteins and proteins, so many hundreds of thousands of them that it is almost impossible to conceive of their complexity. Actually different combinations are difficult to work out, unless they are ex- perimentally tried out, and it has been our policy at Ames for a number of years to try out various combinations in practice and see what they will do, and then learn from our experiences with them. Let us remember before passing to the factors that make up an adequate diet that a ration may be good because of the absence or presence of an undesirable or desirable quality respectively, or bad WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE RATION 105 because of the absence of an essential or because of the presence of a non-essential. It is futile, therefore, to try to look for a material something, specific in the corn ration, that is causing difficulty with pigs, so experience teaches us. We want to look for something that is to be found somewhere else, and add it to the corn ration, and thus overcome the difficulty. Balancing a Ration. When we balance rations we must re- member that the demands of animals change. A young, growing pig requires an entirely different ration than the same pig after it has reached maturity and is ready to go to market. The brood sow during gestation requires different feeding than the same sow dur- ing the suckling period, and so on. The weather and external fac- tors are of some importance, for instance, cold weather may have its particular demands for heat-producing feeds. After all, there is a great possibility of combinations that will work, and it is surpris- ing how many good combinations there are when we come to study- ing feeding. The making up and feeding of a swine ration may be compared to the building of an automobile. We need building material to make a pig, such as protein which makes up the muscle, part of the bone, some of the hide, the hair, and so on ; calcium phosphate or bone ash, which will help build the bone ; fat, which will act as a bodily reserve, cushion, and perform other functions. These mate- rials are necessary. In the automobile we need steel, iron, wood and other materials. The pig needs fuel or feed to "keep him going.*' It is supplied by corn, milk, alfalfa, rape, and so on, the auto engine taking gasoline. The pig takes water and air to cool himself, and the engine uses for the same purpose the same mate- rial. The pig has nerves in his body to transmit his impulses ; the automobile has electric wires. The pig has lungs to mix the gasses, and take out of them what is necessary, while the engine has its carburetor. The pig has various organs that tend to keep things in tune, rightly timed, such as certain portions of the brain and so on, and the engine has a timer. The pig has nerve-endings in the muscle and in other tissues that really may, in a sense, be consid- ered as a seat of activity, whereas the engine has spark plugs, where the vital spark that sets the whole thing in motion is set off. The engine to run right must be in perfect order, all parts com- plete. So a ration to serve the highest function must be almost perfectly compounded all factors must be present and in the prop- er proportion if the pig fed thereon is to gain the fastest and in the least possible time. But what are the essential factors of grow- ing rations for pigs ? The Function of Water. First, water water in abundance. Water performs among others these functions: Supplies building material ; regulates the heat through evaporation, ingestion, and ex- cretion ; acts as a solvent, thus facilitating chewing and swallowing. Water furnishes some 68 or more pounds out of pigs and other ani- 106 HOW TO PEED YOUR HOGS mals 7 blood. It is a cleanser, promoting laxative effects and thus in- directly ridding the body of undesirable products. Animals nearly always void more water in the excreta than they take in the solid food. Water, therefore, is very essential, and should not be neglected. Protein Another Essential. Protein of good quality must be present. There are proteins and proteins. Proteins are made out of 18 different building stones called ammo-acids, and these 18 basal elements are combined and re-combined in various and diverse ways so as to make a large number of proteins, the number running into hundreds of thousands. By quality we mean that the right pro- portion of these proteins and building stones should be present, one as compared to another, and it is highly important that the protein mixture should be commensurate with the needs of the organism that consumes it. Only those amino-acids which are necessary for growth and de- velopment should be present, or else their precursors; that is, the amino-acids which can be rebuilt into the essential ones, although this is probably done only to a limited extent. To give a better idea of this the protein quality, zein, which comprises about half of the proteins of corn, is poor because this particular protein does not have any tryptophane or lysine in its make-up, and these two amino-acids are absolutely essential to growth and development. "When one balances up corn, therefore, he must look to those feeds that contain these two amino-acids particularly. That is why one looks to milk, and meat products, and alfalfa pasture, and rape pasture, and young tender bluegrass to supply these deficiencies. The protein quantity must be right. There must be enough of the right " quality mixture/' and this quantity will vary as the feeding period progresses. It will be different when the animal is young compared to when it is old and mature. The amino-acids that are in greatest demand in younger life are not so badly needed in later life, neither from the relatively qualitative nor the quanti- tative standpoint. Every one knows that a quite young growing lard type pig, for instance, will require as much as 20 pounds of tankage with 100 pounds of corn in a drylot, but the same pig when he weighs 300 pounds only takes a pound or two of tankage with 100 pounds of corn. Now to reverse this process and give 1 percent tankage when the pigs are young and gradually increase it to 20 percent when they are old, would be to turn things topsy turvy, and to promote inefficiency. Minerals Must Be Present. Mineral quality is highly import- ant. We must have the right kinds of minerals present in the proper proportion one to the other. It is essential that such minerals' as calcium, a material that forms 40 percent of the dry ash of bone ; and phosphorus, one of the basal elements of bone and essential to bodily development; and sulphur, a constituent of the proteins; and magnesium, for general metabolism ; and sodium, absolutely in- WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE RATION 107 dispensable for correct stimulation of the heart and other tissues; and others that are of great importance be present. Calcium and phosphorus of course can be had in bonemeal; the sodium can be secured in common salt, and so on. Nearly all of these minerals are present in most feeds, but most feeds are always deficient in cer- tain ones, such as corn for instance, or wheat, or rye, or barley; in truth, there are only a few feeds that contain approximately cor- rect mineral quality, and one of these is milk. Others that are good are alfalfa pasture or rape pasture, particularly when these two are combined with corn. That minerals be present in the proper proportion one to the other is essential, but there must be enough of each to supply the demands of the particular pig that is being fed. Certain Vitainines Needed. A peculiar chemical unknown vvhich is labeled fat soluble A, must of necessity be present, else the pig will not thrive. This particular material we know the action of. but we do not know its chemical constituents. We know that under certain conditions it is soluble in fat, as it was first discovered in butterfat ; hence the reason for its name. We have also found it in egg yolk and in the lighter fractions of beef fat, but not in lard, nor in olive oil, nor in cottonseed oil. A little is apparently present in corn oil, but not enough. Our best swine feeding sources of this material is alfalfa leaves, rape leaves, clover leaves, and most as- suredly milk ; although in milk this material, remember, is found to a large extent in the butterfat, being only about one-thirtieth as soluble in the liquid of the milk as in the fat portion. It has re- cently been found that carrots contain this material to the extent of about one-third as much as in equal weights of butterfat. It is presumed that other root crops carry this fat soluble A, and if they do here is one reason for adding roots, for instance, to a corn ra- tion, but ordinarily in limited quantity in order to supply this essential nutritional ingredient. This is a necessary factor in the ideally good ration. There is another peculiar unknown chemical material or vita- mine known as water soluble B. It receives its name like fat soluble A because of its solubility properties. It was first known to be soluble in water and alcohol, and some refer to it by the double- headed title of water and alcohol soluble B. This particular factor is found in most grains and plants, but is lacking in polished rice, for instance, and because it is lacking in polished rice we find pigeons and other animals fed exclusively thereon developing a nerve disease known as polyneuritis, a disease of many nerves; people also get it. Peculiarly enough, this material is found in the rice bran or rice polishings, but when we use rice for human con- sumption we take the bran off, and then eat only the white or the more fashionable white inner kernel. Wheat embryos are rich in this B material, and inasmuch as wheat embryos are carried in the milling over to the wheat middlings, here is one reason why wheat middlings may be a good feed under certain "deficiency of water 108 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS soluble B" conditions. Prof. McCollum, of Wisconsin, says in re- gard to water soluble B : * ' It is universally present in foodstuffs of vegetable and animal origin." Hence, generally speaking, we need not worry much about its absence from pig rations, although under some certain conditions it may not be present. Antiscorbutic Substances Seemingly Necessary. There is an- other class of materials known as Antiscarbutic Substances which are apparently essential in the diet or ration if complete adequacy is to be approached. Oranges, limes, grape fruit, milk, meat meal tankage, alfalfa, clover and other food materials carry these sub- stances. Orange juice is given to babies that are on a boiled and raw milk diet because empirically it has been found of much advantage. Recently Dr. Hess of New York has shown that a prop- erly prepared juice solution of oranges could be injected into the veins of a baby and cure scurvy a constitutional condition which results when these Antiscorbutics are absent. We have seen the disease scurvy in guinea pigs receiving an oats ration. A little milk would not cure it but much would if the disease was not too far advanced. Cabbage was a fine preventive hence presumably rape pasture is splendid inasmuch as it is a near relative of cab- bage. English sailors are sometimes called "Limies" because of lime fruit being given to them in their rations as a preventive of scurvy. When finally these Antiscorbutics are traced down to their real basal makeup we may find a single substance doing the work rather than a number, two or more, of the now designated "Antiscorbutic Substances." Energy Builders. Sufficient net-energy materials must be provided. These will furnish the energy materials for growth, for general development, for movement, and yet supply an excess for conversion into fat and other generel tissues. In this respect, of course, it is best to supply feeds that have a a large amount of that energy per pound of feed consumed, because it takes fewer pounds of higher energy feed to do the same business, and inasmuch as the alimentary capacity of pigs (as compared to cattle) is somewhat limited by natural inheritance, the more concentrated the feeds, other things being equal, the more likely they are to grow fast and fatten quickly. Timothy hay, even though properly balanced with milk, is a poor feed for pigs, because it is too coarse and fibrous ; in other words, too woody. It is not concentrated enough ; there is too much fibre relatively in it. On the other hand, corn or wheat are very efficient because they supply many more heat units or energy per pound weight than coarser materials, such as rough bran, corncobs, and other such feeds. Some feeds contain so much fibre and are so bulky, that an animal expends more on the gathering, chewing, swallowing, digesting and assimilating than he gets out of them. For instance, from peanut shells or certain kinds of wood ground up, an animal extracts nourishment by eating these, but it cost so much to get the nourishment out that he is the loser rather than the gainer. Why rob Peter to pay Paul if it's all in the family? WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE RATION 109 All Factors Must Be Combined. A correct relationship, one to another, of all of the factors named is required. This is a prob- lem for the wisest of sages. Here is where the appetite of the pig comes in splendidly; oftentimes because he can select his own ra- tion pretty well. Of course he. makes mistakes, but under proper conditions he usually gets there in excellent shape. Grind Hard Grains. Suitable physical preparation is neces- sary. Hard seeds, such as wheat, should be ground or soaked, per- haps both, rye the same, barley the same. Grains that have a hard outer husk, such as oats, should be well ground. Feeds that have an outer coating that is tough and fibrous, such as kafir or grain seeds, would need to be finely comminuted. Ear corn needs very little, if any, preparation for young growing pigs, because they do better when they pick the corn off the cob, and chew it up themselves, than when it is ground for them ; that is, they make more econom- ical returns per day and per pig. Some feeds require to be cooked, like potatoes, to break down the starch granules, and make the feed more palatable. Generally speaking, however, the right kinds of physical preparations depend upon the objects sought, and would need to be given special study. Now that we have gone quickly over the essentials of an ade- quate ration, it is well to mention some things that we should avoid in making up a mixture of feeds which we wish to use so as to get the most out of them. Avoid Poisonous Substances First. We must avoid poison- ous materials, being careful, for instance, of cottonseed meal for this reason. We want to be careful of rye, because it sometimes contains ergot, which will cause trouble abortion and other disease. We want to be careful of salt brine, which meat comes out of, be- cause it is poisonous to pigs, if drunk in large quantities. Second. We want to avoid excessive fibre in a pig's ration. The pig is constituted much like the human being, and can not handle a large amount of fibre, hence timothy hay is a poor feed for pigs. Oat straw makes a fair bedding, but it is almost worthless as a feed. The same is true of rye and wheat straw. Walnut shells and hickory nut shells for the same reason are not used for swine. One of the big reasons why it takes sometimes as much as 50 percent more of standard wheat middlings to produce the same amount of gain as 100 pounds of concentrated corn grain, is because of the greater amount of fibre present. Light-weight oats are poor for pigs, because of the large amount of hull present, with its corres- pondingly high percentage of fibre. Third. We want to stay away from inert materials which place a useless burden on the organism. In this respect we might men- tion sand, dirt and similar materials. Of course it may be that certain limited amounts of these so-called inert materials, such as sand and certain kinds of earth, would be beneficial, but generally 110 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS speaking if a feed is mixed with considerable sand and earth, it is relatively undesirable. Efficient Use of Cereals. It is well to know something about the proper use of the cereal grains which are largely used in pork production. If you take the grain or seed alone of wheat, or oats, or corn, or barley, or rye, or kafir, or Milo maize, and attempt to make young pigs grow satisfactorily on any one of these, we find that when we feed them alone there is very little growth, and if the pigs are young enough and of a very light weight when we start, many of them may die. If protein alone is added it helps a little, but not enough, and although we get a little growth, perhaps an in- crease in live weight, yet the ration is manifestly very inadequate. Add the Vitamine Fat Soluble A naturally mixed with butterf at, as it actually is, and it helps very little. Add a mineral mixture alone and it helps some, but the ration is inadequate. Add protein and yellow butterf at (which always carries the Fat Soluble A) only, and we still do not get desirable results. Add protein and mineral mix- ture and we get somewhat better results than with protein alone or the mineral mixture alone, but still unsatisfactory. Now if we add a correct mineral mixture and the material found known as fat soluble A (found in butterf at or alfalfa leaves or carrots) and also a satisfactory protein we, generally speaking, get good growth and development because we have supplied the grain's shortcom- ings. In other words, all of these deficient materials must be pres- ent at one and the same time in order to give good results. These materials, of course, which the grains lack in sufficient quantity, must be given with plenty of water, and in the proper proportion if optimum results are* to be secured. If we take all of these above mentioned grains and mix them in toto one with another in different and diverse proportions, we still have an inadequate ration. It takes other feeds than these grains to make up the ration, so that it is practical and efficient. Add milk to any one of these, or to a mixture of any two or more, and you get splendid results, generally speaking. Add alfalfa pas- ture and the results are surprising. Add meatmeal tankage and the results are splendid. That is because milk, and alfalfa pasture, and meatmeal tankage contain all of the different deficient mate- rials, and thus in practice the allowance of the deficiencies is sim- plified, because we know that certain feeds are rich in just the nec- essary nutritional materials that go to balance the grains. Commonly, the quality and quantity of the proteins of these or- dinary grains are improved greatly by the leaves of plants, such as those mentioned, or the plants of alfalfa, rape, red clover, young tender bluegrass, sweet clover, white clover, Alsike clover, and others. The meat by-products overcome these deficiencies, partic- ularly when allowed in the form of meatmeal tankage ; bloodmeal is also of importance. Fortunately the fat soluble A material can also be secured in milk, and the leaves of plants, and to a con- WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE RATION 111 siderable extent in meatmeal tankage, if properly prepared. The mineral material is also supplied by the leaves of plants, the milks, meatmeal tankage, and also may be furnished directly by the use of ordinary mineral mixtures made up of limestone, bonemeal, sulphur, wood ashes, Glauber's salts, common salt, and so on. Prof. McCollum, pioneer in biological nutrition investigations, has recently written : ' ' It is not possible to make up a diet, derived solely from the seeds of plants, which will support normal growth and health. " It is presumed of course that the animals will be fed on a mineral-free water or, as McCollum puts it, ''Provided salt- free or nearly salt-free water, such as rain water, distilled water and some of the pure and natural waters used for drinking." Plant Leaves Balance Rations. Prof. McCollum, now with Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, has done a wonderful work to simplify the principles of nutrition. He is a great believer, be- cause of being made so by the results of his invesigations, in the leaves of plants for the balancing of grain feeds. So are good practical swinemen. They have long since learned that the leaves of plants, particularly the leguminous plants, alfalfa, red clover, rape, green tender bluegrass and peanuts, are of great importance in balancing the swine grain ration, and in speaking of this we can not but well again quote from this noted authority : "Pigs have in farm practice frequently been stunted and repro- duction has been interfered with as the result of being fed too largely on seeds and by-products of seeds when confined in pens nearly free from vegetation. Under these conditions they get an inorganic supply (mineral) which is not of suitable character, and run short of the unidentified growth stimulant factor, fat soluble A. In many cases they also receive proteins of relatively poor quality. These dietary faults are sufficient to undermine the health of the animal. When, however, the leaf is fed with seed, highly successful nutrition has been secured. Simple mixtures such as 60 per cent of rolled oats with 40 percent of alfalfa flour, prepared by grinding and sifting the dried leaves, were capable of promoting normal growth and well-being when fed throughout life. The reason for this is clear. The leaf portion supplies the fat soluble essential in which the seed is deficient, and also makes good the ' particular mineral elements contained in insufficient amounts in the seed. Similar mixtures of wheat or corn with alfalfa-leaf flour, promote the well-being of animals in a manner which we have never been able to successfully imitate with mixtures of seeds." Let us say to Prof. McCollum. in these respects that swinemen have long ago found out that what he says is true gospel in that alfalfa is most thoroughly appreciated, as is red clover, in the great corn-alfalfa regions of the west and eastern sections ; in truth, in all sections where alfalfa and clover are grown and used for swine feeding. 112 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS Without making this discussion too technical, it is well to present the representative chemical analyses which will give the swine feeder an idea as to the amount of water, protein (muscle, bone, hide, hair, hoof, and nerve-builders) ; carbohydrates, fibre excluded (a material that furnishes the energy that is converted into work and fat) ; crude fibre (the stuff that is not very valuable for swine feeding, in truth, only a little of it is needed, excepting perhaps in satisfying the appetite or capacity of the brood sow, and it is easy to even overdo with her) ; fat, called sometimes ether extract (a material that is. converted into animal fat In the body or may be used to furnish heat or to furnish energy for work) ; and mineral matter (ash) (the stuff that makes up bone, that furnishes the stim- ulants that keep the heart beating and the blood moving and all of that sort of thing) . Of course in this table no attempt is made to distinguish between the different kinds of proteins, or fats, or to show just how the mineral matter is made up, but in general the analyses as given are those customarily presented in standard works on feeding and are helpful in teaching one to appreciate in general how feeds are made up chemically. Carbohydrate Equivalent. In addition to these constituents there is given the carbohydrates or starch equivalent which is se- cured by adding together the carbohydrates, fibre and fat (multi- plying the fat, however, by 2.25). This summation is known as the carbohydrate or starch equivalent. This represents in a way the gross possible fattening materials present, although it gives but little indication as to how much energy is needed to con- vert these into growth and fat. The protein of a feed may be used, when an excess is present, in the making of fat, or for furnish- ing energy, but in practice protein, being quite expensive relatively, had best not be purposely fed in great excess, although plenty for normal use should be present. There is also given the ratio or number of pounds of fattening material present with every pound of protein. This is quite useful in that it shows which feeds are of a narrow ratio, and which may be used in balancing the grain ra- tions that have wide ratio. For instance, corn has a wide ratio of 7.9, according to these round figures. Now to balance it for young growing pigs one would need to feed with it such feeds as tankage with a narrow ratio of .53, or skimmilk, with a ratio of 1.3, or buttermilk,' with a ratio of 1.3, or bloodmeal, with a ratio of .04. This table can be used as reference, and should be particularly studied from the standpoint of the water content of feeds because the more water a feed has in it, other things being equal, the less its net value. Remember, it is the dry matter that counts. A feed which is marked 7 percent water, such as meatmeal tankage, has 93 pounds of dry matter in every 100, whereas skimmilk, which has 90 percent water, has only 10 pounds of dry matter in 100. Of course we would not expect 100 pounds of skimmilk to be as valuable with only 10 pounds of dry matter in it as 100 pounds of meatmeal tankage, with 93 pounds of dry matter in the same weight. Man- gels, for instance, contain 91 percent water or only 9 pounds of dry WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE RATION 113 matter in 100 pounds of roots. Now roots are- good feeds, but they are very bulky because of their high water content. A pound of potatoes ordinarily will go much further than a pound of mangels, because in every 100 pounds there is present 21 pounds of dry mat- ter or over two times as much as the 9 pounds in the same weight of mangels. SWINE FEEDS COMPOSITION To Be Used as a General Guide Most feeds vary enough so that figuring them to the 2nd decimal point is not a reasonable procedure. (All figures given in round numbers of pounds to the hundred.) Basal Feeds "^o ^ ' .o.B ggH la la c ^" 2 K* g I 5 1 & 1M !* & K **'3S 8-3-g '^w's'^ S'S'i s . * w h ^'"3 to s-^1 60 || i Js'g'S rt Sg^l oj Protein (Muscl Hide, Hoot, Ne Bone Builders). rt In r2*^ :3-~ Fat (Ether Ext '+2 III *^&35 c O a) Mn, &<% c ||'g| is* 2 "* t-, s Meatmeal tankage, high-protein Meatmeal tankage, low-protein Whole milk 7 7 86 90 60 40 4 4 5 10 5 5 2 4 11 11 4 15 28 1 1 31.8 38.8 14.0 5.0 0.53 0.97 3.5 1.3 Buttermilk Linseed oil meal old process ... . 90 10 4 33 5 36 8 "7" 1 6 5.0 59.8 1.3 1.8 Q 85 2 1 3 3 04 Soy beanmeal . . . 12 33 29 4 17 <; 71.3 2.2 10 25 56 5 1 3 63 3 2 5 Peanut meal (without hulls) Peanut meal with hulls 8 8 42 35 23 22 8 22 14 9 5 4 62.5 64 3 1.5 1 8 Oats Oatmeal, without hulls 12 9 11 12 14 18 55 66 58 12 3 4 5 6 5 4 2 4 78.3 82.5 73 3 6.5 5.9 4 1 Middlings, standard, wheat 11 10 17 16 56 54 7 10 4 4 5 ' 6 72.0 73 4.2 4 6 Cottonseed meal, high grade 8 13 42 23 25 52 10 6 7 2 6 4 50.8 62 5 1.2 2 7 Gluten feed, corn Gluten meal, corn 10 9 26 36 51 48 7 2 4 4 2 1 67.0 59.0 2.6 l.fc Oilcake meal, corn Alfalfa hay, very high grade, leafy .... Alfalfa leaves 9 12 10 22 20 24 47 37 38 10 20 1? 10 3 2 9 13 79.5 61.5 56.8 3.6 3.1 2.4 Clover, red, hay, high grade 12 80 16 2 41 15 20 1 4 7 2 70.0 16 4.4 8 Beet sugar 83 89 2 1 13 7 1 1 1 1 14.0 8 7.0 8 Mangel wurtzel Sweet potato 91 70 1 2 6 25 1 1 .... 1 1 7.0 28.3 -70' 14 2 Miscellaneous Feeds .1 2 21*1? J, i "g --~ 6 HH d j*| <^ Rock Phosphate. This should preferably be finely-ground, really powdered. Rock phosphate is supposed by some to be the remains of animals, and hence we find large quantities of calcium and phosphorus present, as in bone. These two chemical elements comprise the basal elements of bone, so much so, in fact, that when we speak of tri-calcium phosphate we instinctively think of bone. Rock phosphate will supply both the calcium and phosphorus, and there is not so much need for limestone when the rock phosphate is available. Remember, however, that limestone does not furnish phosphorus ; hence even with limestone in the ration, phosphate is advisable. Bonemeal from the packing house is rich also in cal- cium and phosphorus and carries some protein and fat and may take the place of the rock phosphate, being more acceptable but somewhat more expensive relatively. It only takes a small per- centage of the total feed as bone meal, usually not over 1, more likely less, hence a little greater expense in such a small item is hardly noticeable. Wood Ashes. Wood ashes contain three elements that are particularly advantageous calcium, phosphorus and potassium. All are essential in the make-up of the animal body. About one- half of the wood ashes is calcium carbonate or a pure limestone. Wood ashes have been widely used for years and years by success- ful hogmen, and the practice of using them is good and sound. Common Salt. By all means supply common salt freely. Some folk have the idea that it should not be allowed, but nevertheless it should. . Some experimental tests at Ames clearly have shown that common salt allowed at free-will is a valuable addition to the ration. It costs little, but it may yield a high return. To get an idea as to the results we have had in the feeding of salt, we present the results on some well-grown young swine of approximately 150 pounds average weight. These pigs received a basal ration of corn, linseed oilmeal, in the ratio of 6.1 pounds of corn to each pound of linseed oilmeal. Eight pigs were in a group, there being five groups in all. These groups were fed as follows : 138 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS Group 1. Corn plus linseed oilmeal, basal ration. Group 2. Same as Group 1, excepting the pigs got a little more than 3/5 of an even ounce of salt daily per group, or about 1/13 of an ounce per pig daily. This was mixed with the feed. Group 3. Same as Lot 2, excepting twice as much salt, practically 2/13 of an ounce daily per pig. Group 4. Same as Group -2, excepting four times as much salt, practically 4/13 of an ounce daily per pig. This is a little over !/3 ounce. Group 5. Same as Group 1, excepting that salt was allowed ad libitum, or free-choice style, being placed in a separate trough. This group of pigs consumed on the average practically an ounce of salt daily, or one-eighth of an ounce per head daily. This experiment was run for a check period of 90 days before salt was fed, and during this 90-day period all groups were fed the same proportion of corn and linseed oilmeal; then after these 90 days were passed the groups were fed as stated with their dif- ferent allowances of salt. As soon as salt was allowed we find that for 71 days following the first period, or for the 71 days during which they were on salt, for every 84.24 pounds gain made by Group 1, receiving no salt, Group 2 gained practically 10 pounds more or 94.02 pounds. This shows the advantage of a little salt. Group 3 gained more than 12 pounds more or 96.97 pounds, showing a still greater advantage from feeding salt in just a little greater quantity. Group 4 gained 94.13 pounds, which was not quite 10 pounds more, indicating that too much salt can be fed where it is mixed with the feeds. The most interesting development was that Group 5, receiving salt ad libitum, gained practically 13 pounds more on the same basis, or 97.23 pounds, showing quite clearly, so far as this test is concerned, that ad libitum or free-choice feed- ing is the best, so far as the gain is concerned. It is easy to allow salt free-choice style. We do it by giving pigs free access to salt, using the rock salt preferably to prevent waste. We think there is no question that if pigs really need salt very badly they will be able to get it from the rock variety. We like very much the block salt, which is on the market, and prefer it to the rock, because it is not so hard and because pigs can get more of it in less time, and yet it is hard enough to prevent waste when it is under cover. Let us now look to the feed requirement for 100 pounds of gain during the salt-feeding period of 71 days. For every 101.88 pounds of feed required to produce a unit gain, Lot 2 required 94.29 pounds; Lot 3, 91.56 pounds; Lot 4, 89.92 pounds and Lot 5, the best of all, only 89.36 pounds. Hence we see that all groups that received salt required less feed for 100 pounds of gain on this interpretation than did the no-salt group, and also that where the salt was allowed free-choice style the most creditable showing was made. PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 139 Let us bear in mind that too much common salt fed sud- denly may cause trouble. Accustom pigs to it slowly, and do not throw in the troughs any brine in which salt pork has been, be- cause in this case pigs, particularly if they have not been getting meatmeal tankage or similar feeds, will be so anxious because of the meat flavor of the salt brine to consume it that they may con- sume an extraordinary amount, and the salt in it may kill them. Primarily, we think, in these cases, because of the favorable meat flavor of the salt brine, they over-consume. But then, too, salt thrown out to the pigs even in its original form is apt to cause trouble, if they have been starved from it for a long time. Sulphur. This may be allowed. We are not sure of the efficiency of sulphur, but believe that powdered sulphur or Glau- ber's salts, which is really a sodium sulphate, can be allowed to pigs to good advantage. Perhaps both can be allowed but we are inclined to favor the Glauber's salts. We hope to have something more definite to offer on this later. These sulphur compounds are supposedly valuable because they furnish sulphur, which is an essential constituent of bodily protoplasm and which must be pres- ent in the ration somewhere, or else an animal cannot grow properly. Charcoal or Slack Coal. Just why charcoal, slack coal or partially burned cobs are fed they all being of about the same character is not exactly known. It is usually said that charcoal is fine because it absorbs alimentary gases, but no one has yet dem- onstrated that the gases should necessarily be absorbed in this manner. Anyhow, apparently, they offer some advantages. We believe that if these materials are supplied to pigs, and they eat of them, the chances are that they may do some good. We have found that pigs receiving corn alone are more likely to eat large quantities of charcoal or slack coal than those that have a prop- erly balanced ration, made up of corn and meatmeal tankage, or corn and milk, and we have found that pigs that have been furn- ished with corn and meatmeal tankage free-choice style during the entire period of their lives in drylot eat very little charcoal in their earlier stages of development, when they are on a heavy tankage ration, consuming up to say % to % of a pound daily. But when pigs reach 300 pounds or thereabouts, and are living practically entirely on corn (maybe 1 percent would be meatmeal tankage), then they begin to eat charcoal, eating more in one day than in their whole previous lives, and not only one lot that we have ex- perimented with but many have done this, thus indicating that there is a newly-developed need, after hogs come down to prac- tically entirely corn. Some day we may know more about mineral mixtures, but to- day we are in a transition state of knowledge concerning these mixtures, and so long as things are uncertain in regard to them we prefer not to give mixtures, but would emphasize the free-choice 140 HOW TO E*EED YOUR HOGS style in the feeding of the materials mentioned. We believe, how- ever, that some mixtures are quite acceptable, mixtures, for in- stance, such as bone meal 100 parts with common salt 50 parts, or wood asLes and salt, and some others. Corn Lacks in Fat Soluble A. This is secured in alfalfa, rape, red clover, meatmeal tankage, milk and so on. Green feeds help out wonderfully. Roots, such as carrots, are advantageous, because a pound of carrots contains as much as % of a pound of this vita- mine material of unknown chemical composition. In the main the shortcomings mentioned are the only ones that may be charged up against corn, but these are borne to a large degree also by barley, wheat, rye, sorghum grains, emmer and potat f es ; hence when we learn to balance corn we learn to balance these other feeds, which are tho main feeds of pork production. Practically all of these feeds mentioned as basal concentrates in pork production barley, wheat, rye and so on may therefore be balance^, with the same supplements that balance corn. These supplements are milk, tank- age, alfalfa, clover, rape and so on. Corn is splendid for pregnant sows, sucking pigs, boars, dry sows, maintenance hogs and others. With the brood sows, of course, one must be careful, because they are inclined to overfeed and that may interfere with the breeding regime, more especially of extreme lard-type hogs. However, a mod- erate amount of corn may always be fed with much psychological profit, particularly economical profit, in the heart of the cornbelt. Preparing Corn for Hogs. The question of the preparation of corn needs a little discussion. Of all of our basal grains, however, corn requires the least general all-around preparation. To get a comprehensive idea as to the necessity of soaking shelled corn, or grinding it into meal, or both grinding and soaking the grain, it is well to give a little experimental evidence to bring home to the swineman the fact that corn, generally speaking, does not need much preparation. At the outset, however, we emphasize that ear corn is the best all-around preparation, and that shelled corn runs it a close second. We speak of ear corn as being a preparation- because the husks are removed. Some young pigs weighing 50 pounds at the beginning and 140 pounds at the finish of a 140-day feeding test had been run from weaning time in early summer to late in November on grass, being fed four different preparations dry ear corn, soaked shelled corn, dry ground corn and soaked ground corn and they gave results as follows : Preparation Daily Grain Eaten per Pig Average Daily Gain Grain per 100 Pounds Gain Dry ear 3 37 .74 456 Soaked shelled Dry ground corn 3.24 3 60 .63 .61 513 595 Soaked ground corn 3.98 .72 555 Peculiarly enough, for these young, rapidly-growing weaning pigs, dry ear corn was the best preparation, and not onlyNfrom the PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 141 standpoint of average daily gains made but also from the stand- point of least grain required for 100 pounds of gain. If the corn must be prepared rather than grind or grind it and soak it, it is better simply to shell it and soak it. What will happen with pigs of a little larger weight? Some 100-pound shotes were fed 140 days from early spring to the middle of the summer. They had a final weight of about 290 pounds. Their ration was 92 percent corn grain and 8 percent meatmeal tankage, this being allowed in drylot. The following table shows that as igs grow older they get greater relative benefit from the more elaborate preparations: Preparation Diily Grain Eaten per Pig Average Daily Gain Grain per 100 Pounds Gain Dry ear Soaked shelled 6.15 5 74 1.32 1 30 465 442 Dry ground corn * 5.60 1.21 463 Soaked ground corn 6.75 1.52 445 But here again we notice that if the corn is to be prepared soak- ing is a fine way to prepare the shelled corn, although the results are close in all instances. One can study these figures and suit him- self as to best methods of procedure. Let us figure out what happens to still larger hogs hogs weighing about 200 pounds at the start and fed 84 days to a final weight of about 360 pounds. The ration was corn grain 91 percent and meatmeal tankage 9 percent, fed in spring and summer dry yards. The table showing the results of four different corn preparations the same preparations fed to younger swine above follows : Preparation Daily Grain Eaten per Head Average Daily Gain Grain per 100 Pounds Gain Dry ear 8 14 1 74 468 Soaked shelled Dry ground corn 8.65 8.99 1.92 1 99 449 452 Soaked ground corn 9.22 2.00 461 Now we notice that as swine get older, and heavier, and more mature, the dry ear corn can be shelled and soaked to advantage, and, further, that soaking and shelling are as advantageous, gen- erally speaking, as was the grinding or grinding and soaking. What happens to still more mature hogs, such as old sows weigh- ing about 200 pounds and fed to a final weight of 335 pounds, on the ratio of corn grain 93.3 percent and meatmeal tankage 6.7 per- cent in fall dry yards for 59 days ? The answer follows : 142 HOW TO PEED YOUR HOGS Preparation Daily Grain Eaten per Head Average Daily Gain Grain per 100 Pounds Gain Dry ear 8 73 2 04 427 Soaked shelled 9 89 2 49 398 Dry ground coin. ... 9 65 2 40 401 Soaked ground corn 9 87 2 44 405 Again the figures show that preparation for older hogs is in order, but that soaking shelled corn is equally if not more advan- tageous than grinding, or grinding and soaking. From the results given, therefore, we may rightfully conclude that young pigs make relatively faster and more economical gains on dry ear corn than they do on soaked shelled corn, or dry ground corn, or soaked ground corn, and, furthermore, that as pigs grow older, and heavier, the corn that is prepared makes a little more rapid gains and requires a little less feed for 100 pounds of gain, but in any case, drawing broad conclusions, soaketj shelled corn is to be generally preferred to dry ground corn or soaked ground corn. Indiana Results. A word as regards the results of Prof. F. G. King of Indiana along the same line. He fed swine of different weights and ages on three different corn preparations ear corn, dry shelled corn and ground corn (just wet enough so it would not be thrown out of the troughs by the pigs while eating). In all instances the corn was balanced with a little wheat middlings or wheat middlings and tankage. As we study the figures we conclude without presenting them for consideration that shelled corn as com- pared to ear corn for young pigs is about equally good, not only as regards the gains made but the feed required for 100 pounds of gain. There is little difference in these two. The older swine above 100 pounds show that ear corn is apparently a little better feed, although the differences are relatively slight and within the limits of experimental error. Ground corn, as compared to ear corn, is just a little less efficient for real young pigs, although^ only slightly so ; whereas for older swine ground corn comes into its own, becom- ing more and more efficient as the hogs get older and heavier, in that the gains are a little more rapid and the feed required for 100 pounds of gain is a little less. The results show a saving of some 17 pounds of feed for 100 pounds of gain where ground corn is fed as compared to ear corn for pigs weighing 140 to 220 pounds at the beginning of the feeding test. Roughly speaking, this would mean a saving of about 4 percent in feed, which is hardly sufficient to cover the cost of shelling, grinding and wetting when corn is low in price. When corn is high in price it may do so. But the point is that soaked shelled corn is as efficient as ground corn; hence why grind? Why waste time? Why wear out a feed grinder for this purpose? Of course, if one has show stock, it is a case of doing anything reasonable to stimulate the appetite, and a little ground corn is useful in such a situation. We prefer usually to wet or soak the PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 143 feed that is ground in such cases. For sucking pigs we think a little soaked shelled corn effectual in getting them started, this being fed along with the dry. We also think that for suckling sows the soaking of some of the shelled or ground corn is ad- vantageous. Corn and Cobmeal. Corn and cobmeal is a poor swine feed; for young growing pigs it is a delusion and a disappointment, being too fibrous and coarse. It actually requires more corn grain to produce 100 pounds of gain on young, growing pigs when such feed is fed than where dry ear corn as allowed or soaked shelled corn or any other ordinary preparation. Soaking the corn and cobmeal helps some, but even then it is unprofitable. About the only place the swine show that corn cobmeal can be used with any degree of satisfaction is with the brood sow that is being carried through the winter, but even in that case corn and cobmeal has little to recommend it as compared to ear corn or shelled corn. To illustrate the point, experimental evidence is submitted. We had four groups of yearling sows on four preparations. Lot 1 was fed ear corn ; Lot 2, corn and cobmeal ; Lot 3, shelled corn ; and Lot 4, ground corn. They received in addition to 4 pounds of corn grain per head daily (the cob was thrown in extra, over and above grain in Lot 2) % of a pound each of meatmeal tankage, linseed oilmeal and wheat middlings, together with as much salt as they wished at free-will. The results tell an interesting story. Inas- much as the feed was kept the same in all groups, so far as the grain was concerned, the average daily gain per sow, compara- tively speaking, tells a true tale. Lot 1 gained .65 pounds daily; Lot 2, .66 ; Lot 3, .67 ; and Lot 4, .61, showing clearly that ear corn was as good as the corn and cobmeal, or the shelled corn, but that ground corn was the poorest of all. We don't know just how to explain this, and hope to repeat the test, so far as the ground corn is concerned, but feel certain that the corn and cobmeal will not show up to any better advantage. The salt consumption is interesting. More than four times as much salt was eaten where corn and cobmeal was allowed as where ground corn was fed, showing that the cob introduced into the ration encouraged salt consumption, possibly because of the high potassium content, but inasmuch as salt is cheap this makes little difference. That all of these rations were splendid, and that any of the preparations did not adversely affect the new-born pig to any degree is shown by the average weight and vigor of the differ- ent groups. The little pigs from the ear corn fed sows weighed 2.51 pounds each on an average; corn and cobmeal pigs, 2.48; shelled corn pigs, 2.42; and ground corn pigs, 2.47. This is a "toss-up," and we should consider all groups as having done equally well. The average vigor was close to 90 percent perfect in all cases. This goes to show that with a large amount of corn in the ration, properly balanced, for brood sows, good, strong, husky pigs can be produced, and we have found that when milk is used to 144 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS i : balance the corn ration, or meatmeal tankage, or alfalfa hay, either ground or fed in a rack, or good green pastures of alfalfa, or red clover, or rape, good, strong pigs can be produced, even though the major portion of the ration is corn; and we have further found that, as a general rule, we have not only got better, bigger, stronger, more thickly-coated and more nicely-boned pigs where we have properly supplemented the corn, but the pigs have cost less money at farrowing time, particularly where we used meatmeal tankage, or alfalfa hay, or milk, or any of the good pastures mentioned. Corn and Other Feeds. Corn, as compared to other feeds is more valuable per pound than barley or rye. Good, dry corn has about the same value as ordinary feeding wheat, although any corn in the fall that runs 30 per cent moisture does not compare favor- ably with wheat, because it is low in the particular material that does the real business in producing hog gains, namely, dry matter. On the dry matter basis, good hard old corn running 10 per cent water, which is considerably below the average, contains in every 100 pounds of corn, 90 pounds of dry matter. In the fall when new corn comes on, particularly in a year when frosts come a little early, 30 percent corn is not at all unusual. Such corn contains 70 pounds of dry matter in 100 pounds, or 20 pounds less than good, hard corn. The comparative value is, therefore, primarily dependent upon the comparative amount of dry matter present in each 100 pounds of these respective corns, or a comparison of 70. with 90. In other words, it will take as many 100 pounds of this softer corn to equal 100 pounds of good hard corn as 70 is contained into 90 or 128.57 pounds, or, comparing it on the other basis, 100 pounds of 30 percent moisture corn is equivalent in feeding value to 77.7 of good hard corn. Of course, this comparison is on a dry matter basis. We believe that in actual practice new corn dry matter is a little more valuable, pound for pound, than old corn dry matter, when both are fed in the natural state ; but if one will take the trou- ble to soak the old corn, then there should be little difference. At any rate, this difference on account of degree of hardness of the grain is relatively small as compared to the big difference in values for each 100 pounds based on the dry matter content. We give this at some length to emphasize that when comparing other feeds with corn it is quite essential to know what kind of corn one is talking about. There is more difference between different corns of varying moisture percentages. than there is for instance between good corn and good wheat. It is similar to the old, old story of there being more differences within certain breeds than there is between the average of one particular breed and the average of some other breed. Soft Corn. Soft corn varies much, depending on its moisture content, and in determining its value it is well to take a sample to a nearby elevator and have the moisture determined, and then com- pare the different corns examined upon the basis of dry matter fur- nished by 100 pounds of each, the dry matter being determined by simply subtracting the moisture percentage from 100. For instance, PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 145 if corn runs 30 percent moisture, according to the elevator deter- mination (which, by the way, is an oil method devised by the Gov- ernment), the dry matter content will be 70 pounds in each 100 pounds (or 100 minus 30 which equals 70). Soft corn is especially good for pigs. They relish it and do well on it, and it is surprising how well hogs will handle soft corn, even though it is quite moldy and of poor appearance. We must remember, however, that with soft corn more tankage should be fed than with hard corn, possibly because the germs are cut short in development. Our advice would be that when soft corn is fed along with tankage it would be well to secure some corn oil cake meal, which is really the corn germs, with the oil mostly pressed out, and feed it in conjunction. In this way tankage will be saved, and the pigs should make more rapid gains. Corn and Pork Prices. The great importance of corn has been emphasized by the Food Administration. It realized that swine production in America centers to a large extent around corn, in truth to such an extent that a definite ratio exists between the price of a bushel of No. 2 corn in Chicago compared with 100 pounds of average hogs. This ratio for the ten years ending in 1916 was 11.67 or, more plainly speaking, as an average for those ten years, an average 100 pounds of live hog, Chicago, would buy at the same point 11.67 bushels of No. 2 corn. The commission appointed by Herbert C. Hoover composed of seven members (the author was chairman), determined that on the average it takes, under present (1917) conditions, approximately the equivalent of 12 bushels of No. 2 corn to produce 100 pounds of marketable swine on the aver- age farm. This is not all corn, of course, but it is expressed in corn equivalent; in other words, it might take 9 bushels of corn to do the actual feeding, then the money secured for the other 3 bushels would pay for the risk, interest, supplementary concentrates and other feeds, pastures, depreciation, buildings and marketing. In practice the man who secures 100 pounds of gain from 500 pounds of grain, corn furnishing the major part or upwards of 80 percent, is doing well. This figure includes the feed fed all hogs on the farm, but it takes into consideration no losses except of pigs before weaning time. It is possible to produce pigs from weaning time on to 225 or 250 pounds with an outlay not to exceed 400 pounds of feed for 100 pounds of gain, but this is one of the most efficient periods in swine husbandry, because when we start at weaning time we start with a pig that has a considerable number of charges against him such as sow feed, boar feed, labor and so on, and that is why weanling pigs sell for much more than the market price. Hence it is unwise for anyone to show how profitable swine hus- bandry is by using a feeding record which covers a period from weaning time to marketable weight. Such a method is misleading to the novice. Barley. This is a fine feed for swine. It is especially used to advantage in the western part of the country, and in some sections 146 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS' it is the main basal feed. Barley together with alfalfa makes an especially good combination, although not so good as corn and alfalfa. Barley ranks next to corn as an all-around basal feed. Corn in the cornbelt outyields it, and that is an important consider- ation. Barley is quite palatable and good for all classes of swine, but it is a little too fibrous for taking hogs to a heavy finish. Swine can be pretty well finished on barley, but not so well as on corn, and, furthermore, it takes longer to finish them, hence the tendency in the barley-producing countries is to produce hogs of relatively lighter weights than in the cornbelt, and in some barley sections the bacon type of swine is particularly favorable because of the fact that necessarily good bacon hogs should go to market at around 175 to 200 pounds, and thus barley does not reach the period of its handicap, the high finishing period from 200 up to 300 pounds. Barley has practically the same deficiencies as corn, and the same supplements may be used for it as have been recommended for corn. Barley is healthful, relatively speaking, and produces an excellent quality of pork. The fat is hard and white, and the quality of bacon made from barley, particularly when it is combined with milk, very good. The preparation of barley is more complex than that of corn, because it must be ground or rolled, if best results are to be secured ; in truth, it is not profitable to feed barley whole to swine. In practically all cases it should be ground, and preferably wet or better still soaked for 24 hours before feeding. The labor and time spent in correct preparation of barley yield big returns. In the matter of preparation corn grain has a big advantage over barley, because labor and time are saved, inasmuch as the corn does not have to be prepared, while barley does. Barley is about 85 to 90 percent as valuable, pound for pound, as good dry corn or wheat, though dry barley is more valuable than 30 percent moisture corn. Keep in mind in these comparisons that we refer to a good No. 2 corn, containing not more than 14 percent moisture. One pound of barley dry matter is hardly so good as a pound of corn dry matter. Wheat. Because of the great value of wheat for human con- sumption in ordinary times it cannot be used to a large extent for swine feeding purposes, except in a minor way. Of course there is a great tendency even in war times to feed considerable wheat to swine, but this is because wheat in many sections is really worth less cents per 100 pounds than corn, and, hence is used when such conditions prevail. Being used for human consumption, the price of wheat usually puts it out of the reach of swine. The fact that wheat is used in poultry feeding to good advantage also means that swine have a stiff competitor. People and poultry can outbid swine for products that are equal- ly well-adapted to all three. As a result, wheat feeding with swine is largely confined to the feeding of its by-products. Wheat is quite palatable, praticularly when ground and soaked. It produces a good quality of pork, the fat being firm and of good color. The PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 147 germs of wheat contain a toxic property and, other things being equal, it militates against the use of wheat from a physiological standpoint, but only to a minor degree, because there is so little germ present in proportion to the total amount of wheat. Thorough preparation should be given wheat. It should be ground and prob- ably wet or better still soaked before feeding. In some grinding experiments as much as 50 to 100 pounds of wheat has been saved on each 100 pounds of gain by the grinding and wetting (or soak- ing) process. Wheat is suitable for fattening, and will put on a high finish. It is better than barley, although not so good as corn. Wheat is adapted to all classes of swine. So far as supplements are concerned, wheat has about the same deficiencies as corn or barley, hence the same supplement may be used. If a little wheat or barley or preferably both be mixed with corn, less meatmeal tankage is required to balance the ration, although this difference is not large. In other words, less tankage is required with a mixture of corn, barley and wheat than with any one of them alone in order to secure the best results. In a senatorial inquiry (March, 1918,) carried on by the Com- mittee on Agriculture and Forestry, of which Senator Gore of Oklahoma is chairman, the statement was made, that 12 pounds of wheat is equal to 20 pounds of corn grain. This is misleading, and not in accord with the facts. Of course 12 pounds of good kiln-dried wheat is equal in feeding 1 value to 20 pounds of real soft corn that runs over 45 percent moisture, but average wheat if compared to good No. 2 corn has no such high relative value as the testimony indicates. Good average wheat is about equal in feding value to good dry corn, pound for pound, but when it is taken into consideration that the wheat must be prepared a part of this relatively high comparative value of wheat is sacrificed. Eye. Rye is a particularly good economic feed where the land is poor, and it can be used to good general advantage in pork pro- duction. It is ordinarily considered alongside of corn, wheat and barley as a basal feed, but it is the poorest all-around feed of the four. It is considered that rye must be ground and soaked in order to be used to advantage, because of its hard, flinty kernels. If rye is fed whole many of the kernels pass undigested, as in the case of wheat or barley, hence the reduction and softening process is in order. Rye is generally used as a partial ration to better advan- tage than as the entire basal ration. In this case it may be used as a partial basal concentrate. Rye sometimes contains ergot, which is detrimental to swine, causing them to abort. Because of this rye has received much really undeserved criticism, which criticism should be charged up to the ergot, but unfortunately rye harbors the ergot growth, and hence must take the consequences of the ergot's unfavorable influence. Good clean rye, however, is fed to advantage. It is generally presumed that large quantities of rye are troublesome, tending to cause digestive disorders, but the evi- dences of this are conflicting. The same supplements may be used 148 HOW TO PEED YOUR HOGS with rye as with corn, wheat or barley. Rye is worth about 90 to 100 percent as much as corn, depending on relative methods of feeding. The 100 percent figure is high, but figured as a partial feed in the ration it does have a replacement value, pound for pound, with corn. Eye products have not received the endorse- ment in swine feeding that wheat products have ; rye middlings, for instance, being much less popular than wheat middlings, and appar- ently this is the right distinction to draw between the two. Sorghums. These grains are especially good for swine pro- duction, although not the equals of corn, barley, or wheat. In the drier sections, as in western Kansas and Nebraska, some portions of California and other locations not favored with abundant rain- fall, these dry-land crops are of special economic value, in that they furnish more feed per acre than corn or other grains, which, in turn, means that a larger pork production per acre can be carried on in those sections with these grains than without them. Hogmen living in these localities can tie to these crops, knowing full well that they have a value approximating that of corn. In truth, these dry-land sorghum grains are similar to corn and are used in prac- tically the same way. Alfalfa is especially a great balancer for them in Kansas and Nebraska. Milk and tankage and similar feeds that balance corn grain are used to great advantage in these sec- tions. The dry-land feeds are not so palatable as corn, but on the other hand they produce a good quality of pork. Preparation is necessary. They should be ground and probably w r et or, better still, soaked, in addition, in order to make them more palatable, and in order to make every pound of feed more efficient. The returns from grinding are sufficient to justify the statement that it should prac- tically always be done, excepting in rare situations. Prof. W. A. Cochel.and his co-workers at the Kansas station have done considerable work on the dry-land and sorghum grains, and recently there has been reported by Cunningham and Kenny some of the work that Cochel and his co-workers have done. A Kansas station test, which comprised five lots of ten pigs each, the pigs being fed basal feeds as mentioned, shows up favorably for corn, of course. In all cases the grains fed were supplemented with 2.3 pounds of wheat middlings and .4 of a pound of meatmeal tank- age per pig daily. The basal feed, daily feed per pig, average daily gain per pig and feed required for a 100 pounds of gain are given in the subjoined table : Basal Feed Daily Feed per Pig Average Daily Gain per Pig Feed Required for 100 Pounds Gain Lot 1 Ground kafir Lot 2 Ground milo Lot 3 Ground feterita 4.9 4.9 4.9 .40 .43 1.36 534 523 549 Lot 4 Ground kaoliang Lot 5 Ground coin 4.9 4 9 1.31 46 572 514 PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 149 Note particularly that while corn is superior, in that it produces greater daily gains and requires the least feed for 100 pounds of gain, both ground kafir corn and ground milo maize and even f eter- ita rank up closely. Some other tests in Kansas indicate that ground kafir corn and milo show up favorably in comparison with corn, but that sweet sorghum feed is, to quote the authors, "decid- edly inferior to the other grains. " "The other grains," of course, refers to ground corn, kafir corn and milo maize. In concluding the dry-land grain topic, it is well to bear in. mind that the dry- land sorghums are a god-send to the dry-land farming country in our central western states, and that they are particularly valuable as an adjunct feed in the alfalfa sections situated within or close to the dry-land sorghum country. Hominy Feed. Hominy is a by-product of corn grain manu- facture. It is a residue remaining after the cornmeal or hominy grits have been removed from the corn kernel. The mere fact that hominy feed must be manufactured means getting a product that runs relatively low in water, around 10 to 13 and once in a while to 14 percent. Being a by-product of corn manufactured entirely by a mechanical process, there being no solution made or chemical changes inaugurated, it is an excellent substitute for corn grain. There are two kinds of hominy feed one from which the fat has been partially extracted, and the other in which it is left with the germs. Hominy feed itself really comprises the bran, the germ and the floury white starchy portions, the hard flinty parts of the ker- nel being used for hominy grits or cornmeal. If the germs are fat extracted, this means that when the germs are replaced there is much less fat added to the hominy feed as it comes to the farm than where the fat is not extracted, there being a difference of some 5 percent. In the circumstances then we should naturally believe that the fat-extracted hominy feed is not so valuable as that in which the fat remains, and we should make a difference of about 6 percent in relative values, basing our statement on the facts that a pound of corn fat is worth about two and one-fourth times as much as a pound of ordinary corn starches. But it is good general American policy to extract the fat, inasmuch as it can be used for human consumption, and the extraction of the oil from the germs of corn should be encouraged. While it is true that the feed will probably not be so good for swine, yet we swinemen who believe in the swine business must have the patriotic viewpoint, and put Amer- ica and its inhabitants first. A Substitute for Corn. Hominy is a good substitute for corn, and requires practically the same supplements, but we find in prac- tice that it takes about 20 percent less tankage to balance 100 pounds of hominy feed than it does to balance the same amount of corn. This is presumably due to the large concentration of the germs in the hominy feed, the germs furnishing some of the spe- cific nutritional supplements that are present in tankage. Twenty pounds of hominy feed contains practically- the same amount of 150 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS corn germs or embryos as 56 pounds of the original shelled corn. The man who has been accustomed to corn feeding can feed hominy feed to advantage, because he can go ahead and use it exactly as he does corn, with the exception that less supplement is required. We must not expect quite so rapid a gain, presumably, because of the higher fibre content. As this book goes to press there appears a Purdue Bulletin showing that recent Corn and Hominy feed tests give results showing corn superior. Experimental Results. Skinner and King of the Indiana sta- tion and Eastwood of Ohio have found that their kind of hominy feeds apparently are worth more than corn, pound for pound, but in our Ames tests we have found continuously that good, dry corn is more valuable, pound for pound, than hominy feed. Inasmuch as the moisture contents are not given for the corn in the Ohio and Indiana tests by monthly periods, it is hard to say just what quality of corn the hominy feed was compared with. Our comparisons are all made on the basis of 14 percent moisture corn grain. Ames results secured by the author in conjunction with Dunn, pigs being run from weaning time to the time when they weighed 245 pounds, may be of interest. Two lots were fed. Lot 1 was given shelled corn and 60 percent meatmeal tankage and salt in separate feeders ; whereas Lot 2 was fed exactly the same except that instead of shelled corn being allowed in one feeder, hominy feed replaced it. The following table shows the results of carrying the pigs from 49 to 225 pounds weight, approximately : I ot No. I II Days 143 00 154 00 Average initial weight 48.78 48 72 Average final weight .... 224 82 224 27 Average daily gain 1 23 1 14 Average daily feed eaten: Shelled corn 4 34 Hominy 4 53 Tankage 57 39 Total 4 91 4 92 Feed required for 100 pounds gain: Shelled corn 352 81 Hominy . . . 397 27 Tankage 46 00 34 50 Salt 003 000 Total 398 81 431 77 Pasture acres .0178 .0190 The results on this bluegrass pasture show clearly that more rapid gains are made on shelled corn than on hominy feed, being more than 8 percent more rapid. The total of feed eaten daily is about the same, but the feed required for 100 pounds of gain shows considerable difference, or approximately 11 percent more feed is required with hominy feed than with corn. With hominy feed it took eleven days longer to reach the same weight, the pigs gained more than 8 percent less rapidly and required more than 11 per- cent more feed for 100 pounds of gain than corn, but let us remem- ber that the hominy feed saved tankage some 25 percent on each PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 151 100 pounds of gain made. Figuring the meatmeal tankage as equiv- alent in economic value to 2 pounds of corn, and making an equa- tion of it, 100 pounds of corn equals 105.71 pounds of hominy feed. Note particularly that at the end of the feeding period the hominy feed began to lose out in gains, showing that a little more fibre content apparently tended to retard the gains, hominy feed having the same objections in this respect as barley, only to a lesser degree. A Test at Ames, Iowa. On rape pasture we fed pigs shelled corn self -fed plus meatmeal tankage self -fed, plus salt self-fed dur- ing the entire time from weaning time. about 45 pounds to 225 pounds in weight. Lot 2 received the same treatment except hominy feed was given in place of corn to the end of the forage season, and then the last week or two, just before the pigs reached 225 pounds, they were changed over to corn. On the corn and rape the pigs took 132 days to get the desired weight, but on the hominy feed 149 days. Here, again, we have a saving in time on corn. For 100 pounds of gain Lot 1 required of shelled corn 344.4 and meat- meal tankage 37.2, a total of 381.6 pounds; whereas the hominy feed-fed Lot 2 required 340.8 of hominy feed, 72.1 of shelled corn and 32.9 of meatmeal tankage, a total of 445.8 pounds of feed. Where hominy feed was fed it was not the equal of corn. It took practically 12 percent more feed for 100 pounds of gain with hom- iny feed than with corn, although less tankage was required than usual in this case practically 12 percent less. By making an equa- tion of these figures it is found that 100 pounds of hominy feed is equal to 82.7 pounds of corn, this on the basis that 1 pound of tank- age is considered equivalent to 2 pounds of corn; or, figuring it differently, it took practically 121 pounds of hominy feed to equal 100 pounds of corn. Generally speaking, considering the experi- ments in Indiana, Ohio and Iowa, one can feel that if he buys hom- iny feed at a price less than that for corn, pound for pound, he is not faring badly; but if he can buy hominy feed for 10 percent less than corn he is doing well, and if he can buy it at 15 percent less than corn it is a good buy. We must not forget that hominy feed has some advantages, such as its being dry, and can be easily stored. It also does not need to be ground. We are inclined to think, however, that if hominy feed is wet or soaked it will give somewhat better results than when fed dry but we do not have any experimental evidence to back up this statement of belief. Emmer or Speltz. This crop is not much used. It is grown some in the Dakotas and in the northern sections of -the cornbelt. Emmer is not so valuable as corn or barley. The varieties of emmer that have the least hull are the most desirable. Emmer, in order to give the best results, should be ground, and preferably wet, and better still soaked. Presumably the same supplements may be used for emmer or barley as with the ordinary basal grains. Potatoes. Cull potatoes may sometimes be used to advan- tage in swine production. Potatoes may be used as a substitute for 152 HOW TO PEED YOUR HOGS corn, but they need supplements. Meat and potatoes for humans is comparable to meatmeal and potatoes for pigs. Both are good combinations. The same supplements may be used as with corn. Milk* works well with potatoes. Potatoes are a healthful feed, and make a good quality of pork. Potatoes should be thoroughly cooked. Raw potatoes are not relished, and are not digested as they should be. Thorough cooking is necessary to break down the starch gran- ules and the cell covering so as to make the starch more easily accessible and thoroughly digestible. Cooked potatoes may be considered a succulent feed for pigs, and used as such. The cooking process increases their palatability. It takes from 375 to 450 pounds of potatoes when cooked to equal 100 pounds of grain, like corn. To give the best results potatoes should be fed with other feeds of a more highly concentrated character, particu- larly those that contain less water, for best results, and cooked potatoes, being a bulky feed from the standpoint of the water con- tained, "should be fed liberally, probably three times a day or else kept before the pigs almost continually, so that they can get enough to satisfy. Potatoes are the most valuable, pound for pound, of any of the roots from the standpoint of their ability to save grain. They replace corn and similar grains in the pig's ration just as they re- place bread in the human diet. Peanuts. Whole peanuts are especially fine for pigs. In the southern states they are used extensively. Peanuts are rich in fat up to 45 and even 50 percent, and hence, though highly palatable and much relished by pigs, produce a soft, oily pork, which is docked 'from 50 cents to $2 per cwt., on the live market. The market- able pigs that come from peanut sections are discriminated against by packers, and such discrimination of course has a basis in fact. Soft, oily pork in the packing houses is objectionable. The unfor- tunate part about the whole situation is that even when pigs are fed corn and milk in the peanut districts, when they go to market they are discriminated against, because buyers have no way of telling whether the pigs as judged on foot have been fed peanuts or not, and, as a result, just because the pigs come from peanut sections they are discredited along with their peanut-fed brothers and sis- ters. Peanut meal, which remains as residue after the oil has been extracted, when fed in the cornbelt alongside of corn, produces a satisfactory pork product. The Iowa station has done some work on this, and found that corn and peanut meal from which the fat had been extracted, when fed with bluegrass, made, satisfactory pork, not quite so satisfactory as corn and meatmeal tankage but nevertheless salable and satisfactory. The oil is too valuable for human consumption to feed to pigs as such. With harvested pea- nuts it should be extracted, but where hogs do the harvesting then economic considerations, as regards labor saved, enter into the situ- ation, and make it profitable for the whole peanuts to be fed to hogs as the hogs do their own gathering and harvesting. Hence in cer- tain sections of the south the unharvested whole peanut kernels are fed in the shell to pigs. PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 153 SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDS Skimmilk. Of all the supplementary feeds the milks rank supreme. Whole milk is better than others, but in common practice we can hardly afford to feed whole milk worth $3 per cwt. with but- terfat in it worth 50 cents a pound. Better separate the butterfat and sell it as such, and purchase feeds that will take the place of it. Hence the reason why we depend on skimmilk and buttermilk when we talk about milk products. Milk is primarily produced for young growing animals. It is splendH for them. It carries all of the essentials of nutrition and is particularly valuable in supple- menting corn. We have done considerable experimental work with milk, and often find that a little milk works wonders in the ration. To illustrate : In one test we self -fed for 100 days two bunches of pigs of an initial weight of about 42 pounds. One bunch received buttermilk (which is the equivalent in feeding value of skimmilk) at the rate of 1 quart per head daily, while the other group was fed identically except that no buttermilk was allowed. The following table shows the results secured : BUTTERMILK HAS HIGH VALUE WHEN FED IN LIMITED QUANTITIES. FIVE WEANLING PIGS IN A LOT FED 100 DAYS IN DRY LOT.** Ration Shelled Corn. S. F. Wheat Middlings, S. F. Meatmeal Tankage, S. F. Shelled Corn, S. F. Wheat Middlings, S. F. Meatmeal Tankage, S. F. Buttermilk, not quite a quart per pig once daily. Initial weight per pig . 42 42 Final weight per pig 155 160 Average dailv gain 1.13 1.18 Average daily feed eaten: Shelled corn . 3.40 3.54 Wheat middlings 61 .44 Tankage, meatmeal Buttermilk .62 None .43 1.84 Feed required for 100 pounds gain: Shelled corn ... .... 299.9 299.70 53 5 37 Tankage, meatmeal 54.6 36.0 Buttermilk None 155.80 *With the collaboration of Dunn, Scott and others. *Pigs had access to bone ash, charcoal and rock salt, but ate very little; hence are not charged in this computation. The addition of a quart of buttermilk per head daily increased the gains, and decreased the grains, and decreased the meatmeal tankage and dry feed consumption because it supplied the elements which are added to the ration by these two feeds. The buttermilk also resulted in producing 100 pounds of grain with less dry mat- ter. Briefly stated, 155.8 pounds of buttermilk required for 100 pounds of grain as compared to the buttermilk group saved 18.6 pounds of meatmeal tankage, plus 16.5 pounds of wheat middlings plus .2 of a pound of corn or 100 pounds of buttermilk saved 11.9 pounds of meatmeal tankage plus 10.6 pounds of wheat middlings plus .1 of a pound of corn. Valuing meatmeal tankage at 5 cents a pound or $100 a ton, which is reasonable under present conditions, 154 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS the wheat middlings at 3 cents a pound and the corn at 3 cents a pound, the value of 100 pounds of buttermilk is equivalent to 91.7 cents when fed in this limited quantity. - Skimmilk or buttermilk is particularly fine for suckling sows and more especially for young pigs that are following. Next in order it is good for the pigs at weaning time. The younger the pig and the more rapidly growing the more valuable, realtively, are the milk products. They are all-around supplements, and may be used to advantage in producing animals for show purposes or for the feeding of pregnant sows or breeding boars. The milk products are excellent in convalescence of pigs and have helped in saving many a pig. We have found in most of our tests that 100 pounds of skimmilk or buttermilk is equal in value to 6 pounds of corn plus 6 pounds of meatmeal tankage, when fed in quantities of from 2 to 10 pounds per head daily. This was determined in this way: One group of pigs was self -fed corn and tankage, free-choice style ; another group was fed the same with the exception that from 2 to 10 pounds of buttermilk was fed daily per head. Receiving the buttermilk, they held up on the tankage ration, and also saved some on corn for every 100 pounds of gain ; so that when we figured the value of the butter- milk we found that 100 pounds of buttermilk or of skimmilk, which- ever it might be, saved 6 pounds of corn, in addition to 6 pounds of tankage. With suckling sows and their pigs following, we have found that it has a higher replacement value than this, running up to 10 pounds of each ; and in the case of heavier and more mature swine, not so badly in need of milk as the young growing pig or the suckling sow, the value has been somewhat less than 6, running down to say 5 of each. On the basis of per pound of dry matter no feed is so valuable as is milk, particularly whole milk. Buttermilk. Buttermilk may be considered as the practical equal of skimmilk, analyzing about the same. Buttermilk may be fed exactly the same as skimmilk. We believe, however, that both should come from tested cows (cows that do not have tuberculosis) or from creameries that pasturize milk, or else it should be thor- oughly heated before feeding in order to prevent disease being transmitted to the swine herd. All of our milk products should be carefully handled, so far as disease is concerned. We have done some work wherein we fed grain with buttermilk versus no butter- milk, in which case the buttermilk was fed in very large quantities, practically all the pigs would eat. The pigs were started at about 56 pounds in weight. Group 1 received shelled corn self -fed plus 60 percent protein meatmeal tankage self-fed, plus wheat middlings self-fed, plus rock salt self -fed, all feeds being allowed free-choice style ; Group 2 exactly the same, excepting that buttermilk, in addi- tion to the other feeds, was kept continually before them. The following table shows approximately the number of days and the feed required to reach approximately 300 pounds in weight : PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE BUTTERMILK VERSUS NO BUTTERMILK 155 Record Heading Group I Group II Final weight 296 299 Number of days . 218 156 Average daily feed eaten: Shelled corn 4.871bs. 2.27Ibo. Mtatmeal tankage .37 34 .14 22 Buttermilk . . . . 32.16 Rock salt 00 + 00 + Average daily gain per pig 1.10 1.54 Feed reouired for 100 pounds of gain: Shelled corn Meatmeal tankage Wheat middlings Buttermilk Rock Salt 441 33 31 '".4 148 9 14 2091 .1 The buttermilk pigs made the most rapid gains, and 100 pounds of it saved 14.09 pounds of corn, 1.17 pounds of meatmeal tankage, .81 pounds of wheat middlings and .01 of a pound of salt, a total of 16.07 pounds of concentrates, saved by approximately 9 to 10 pounds of dry matter in 100 pounds of buttermilk. This re-empha- sizes the high value of milk dry matter. Tie to the milks, remem- bering always that they are splendid feeds, and that in case of doubt as to which supplement to use, if you can possibly secure milk then you should do so providing of course that it can be obtained economically. Physiologically it is 0. K. There are some milk products now on the market for swine feed- ing. One is semi-solid buttermilk. It can be compared to ordinary skimmilk on the basis of its dry matter content. If it runs 50 pounds of dry matter to the 100 then it is about five times as valu- able as ordinary skimmilk or even a little better than that, because ordinary skimmilk runs around 9% pounds of dry matter to the 100, the same with buttermilk. Buttermilk powder will run 90 per- cent dry matter, hence it is nine or ten times as valuable on that basis. We must, however, remember that it has a value because it is dry, and it can be stored and used when needed which, in many situations, makes it more acceptable. The use of buttermilk pow- ders or semi-solid buttermilk for "going round the show circuit" is to be commended as a natural milk substitute. We should beware, however, of certain milk products that are foisted on the public by the wonderfully extravagant claims made for them. There is one milk product, for instance, advertised to be mechanically reinforced to the extent that if one gallon of it is mixed with 50 gallons of water you have a product that is equal in feeding value*to ordinary skimmilk. Wonder of wonders! Here is a new panacea for the skimmilk scarcity. It sounds like the promising story of the Garden of Eden, and I take it that those who believe it will gain as much sorrow from their belief as did Adam and Eve from their " forbidden fruit." On the face of this claim, assuming that the chemically reinforced and highly-advertised milk product is entirely dry matter, which is impossible, when you mix 156 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS 50 gallons of water with a gallon of it there cannot possibly be more than 2 or 3 pounds dry matter in every 100 pounds of the mixture. On this basis the final mixture would be worth about, let us say, not more than one-fourth to a third as much as good skimmilk. Meatmeal Tankage. A splendid feed this that has made good in practice. It has been recently developed in our great pig indus- try and won its way into the swine pens of America because of its high merit. There are many grades of meatmeal tankage, but, roughly speaking, they may be divided into 60 percent protein grade and the 40 percent protein grade. Of all the available sup- plements to corn meatmeal tankage (sometimes called meatmeal, sometimes called tankage) ranks alongside of skimmilk, buttermilk, dried milk powders and alfalfa pasture, which are physiologically efficient. Swine relish tankage very much; it is highly palatable. Tankage, in some packing houses, is a by-product of the lard and other grease tanks, the basal tankage in these vats being removed and dried and mixed with evaporated liquid residues from all parts of the plant, which residues are somewhat similar to meat extracts. Sometimes blood is added, so that in the end you have a high- quality 60 percent protein meatmeal tankage, running as much as 15 percent mineral elements, a large proportion of which is bone phosphate. The high heating that the tankage is subjected to pre- cludes the possibility of its being contaminated with disease-pro- ducing germs, as it comes from the vats ; hence there is little danger of tankage carrying cholera or other diseases when made by high- class concerns. Tankage is especially valuable because it contains very little carbohydrates, for carbohydrates should be supplied by our natural farm grains. This is an indirect reason for its goodness. True, it is splendid because it runs high in protein of good quality, and let us put emphasis on the quality. Pound for pound there is no other supplement that balances corn to better advantage, and al- though bloodmeal runs high in protein, yet pound for pound when fed as the lone supplement to corn it is not so valuable as tank- age; dried buttermilk is not so valuable, nor is dried skimmilk powder, pound for pound, because it does not run high enough in protein. We are speaking now on the dry matter basis. Everything considered, of course, dried buttermilk powder plus corn would produce gains with less outlay of dry matter than would corn and tankage, but the point is that a pound of meatmeal tankage containing 60 percent protein will go further, in that it would balance a greater quantity of corn than will a pound of buttermilk powder. Tankage is splendid because it promotes a healthy laxative condi- tion, particularly when fed with corn. It is fine because it contains vitamines, particularly fat soluble, necessary for growth and devel- opment, although we have a suspicion that it does not contain as much of this vital element as it should. Tankage is much PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 157 relished by pigs of all ages and classes. We feed it at our experiment station with good results to pregnant sows, little pigs, suckling sows and fattening hogs. We feed it from the time of impregnation to the time of marketing, going through the entire gamut of swine production. The fact that meatmeal tankage has gone up in war times to $110 and $115 a ton is evidence of the high favor in which it is held by the feeding fraternity. Fishmeal. This is a product which is coming more and more into use, and it will give good results in swine husbandry. Being a fish product it is similar of course in nutrition 'to meatmeal tank- age, although it has the objection of having a peculiar flavor. Swinemen can make use of it, feeding it about the same as meat- meal tankage. The better grades of fishmeal should meet an en- couraging market in the grain-producing sections. Linseed Oilmeal. This is a standard swine feed, and used as a partial ration is all right. It produces a creamy slop, and helps out considerably in producing good coats on pigs. It even affects the new-born pig through the pregnant sow, as some of our exper- iments show. Linseed oilmeal should not be used as a lone sup- plement to corn in a drylot, nor to barley, nor wheat, nor rye. It works very well on pasture, however, as alfalfa, rape or clover, when fed in conjunction with corn. Mixed with meatmeal tankage or with milk, it makes a splendid all around supplement. Linseed oilmeal mixed with middlings is not very satisfactory, and in some cases we have had abortions from such a mixture, due presumably to nutritional deficiencies. Add tankage to the mixture and the evil is apparently offset. Oilmeal has for years been accused of caus- ing abortion in swine. There is no question in my mind but that it does, if fed injudiciously as a lone supplement to corn, for instance, or possibly to any other grain. Where it is fed in conjunction with alfalfa, rape, red clover pasture, alfalfa hay, or meatmeal tankage or milk, we believe that the abortion troubles would be limited to a minimum, and thus oilmeal would tend to come into its own more effectively. Avoid a heavy, sudden feed of oilmeal, partic- ularly with pregnant sows. Oilmeal added to corn and other grain rations is instrumental in producing a good quality bf quite firm fat. In limited quantities it is relished by swine, particularly when mixed with other feeds, but when fed alone it is not very palatable. When allowed in a self-feeder alongside of tankage, for instance, pigs will eat about a pound or two of oilmeal along with 3, 4 or 5 pounds of tankage. Ordinarily they eat from one-third to one-fifth as much oilmeal as of meatmeal tankage, both being allowed when corn is used as the basal feed. It is not fair in feeding tests to compare oilmeal and corn to tankage and corn. This shows oilmeal up to a serious disadvantage, because the oil- meal and corn ration has certain deficiencies which milk, tankage and pasture overcome. It is much fairer to show what oilmeal will do when added to a corn and tankage ration or to a corn and alfalfa ration, especially when the corn and oilmeal and 158 ~ HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS alfalfa are checked against corn and tankage and alfalfa. At ordinary prices, oilmeal is a very good "buy," providing of course that it is used wisely in combination with such supplements as milk, tankage, the good leguminous pastures, and similar feeds. Bloodmeal. This is a packing house dry product, being the dry blood from mixed animal sources, mostly ox. It runs 85 percent in protein higher in protein than any of our supplements, but it is too low in mineral matter. The addition of steamed bonemeal to a bloodmeal ration when fed with corn or similar basal feeds helps, as some of our tests show. We believe that bloodmeal fed on alfalfa or rape pasture in conjunction with milk will give very good results, and we would encourage its partial use in these respects, particularly when the prices of tankage and bloodmeal are so close together, as for instance when tankage sells at $100 a ton and bloodmeal at $125. As a lone supplement to corn or similar feeds, bloodmeal does not work nearly as well as meatmeal tankage, but fed in conjunction with meatmeal tankage it works splendidly. Packers are therefore putting out tankages containing considerable blood in their make-up. Some day we are going to know how to use. bloodmeal to a better advantage than we do now. The addition of bloodmeal to tankage in the packing houses is to be encouraged, so long as they keep the mixture on an efficient basis, inasmuch as it will produce a larger output for the general swine feeding industry. So far the supply of meatmeal tankage has been too low for the best interests of all concerned. Bloodmeal is good for scours. The more meat and milk products we can add to the swine ration within reasonable limits, and at certain prices, the better off will our industry be, particularly when it is on the present corn and other similar grain "balance basis" and where the natural grain feeds of the farm are fed in large quantities. Soy Bean Meal. This is similar to oil meal. It should not be used as a lone supplement to feed to hogs which are quite immature. Bean proteins do not balance corn proteins satisfactorily, unless they are helped out apparently with such feeds as a little milk or a little alfalfa pasture or a little tankage or some similar feed. Rape is fine. More and more soy beans are going to be grown in the future because they are a profitable crop, particularly where they grow well and yield 25 or more bushels to the acre. They make a good concentrated swine feed as they do a good cattle feed. In cattle feeding they have been found to be equal to about the value of cot- ton seed meal. Our advice to those men who can grow soy beans so they yield upwards of 25 bushels to the acre is to study the plant, and figure on introducing it into their farm systems. But we cannot pass to the next feed without re-emphasizing that the soy bean has many serious limitations as does oilmeal, but that fed in its right place it is a valuable adjunct as a supplement in swine feeding. PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 159 Peanut Meal. Generally speaking, peanut meal is a splendid feed and we would emphasize that for swine production it be as low in fibre as possible ; in other words, that peanut meals that contain a minimum of hull be used. We prefer the peanut meal that runs upwards of 38 percent protein and less than 15 percent fibre; in truth, we would like to have it with much less fibre than that if we could get it. Good peanut meal is described as containing not less than 48 percent protein, nor more than 9 percent crude fibre. It is merely a question of the difference in the amount of hulls and vines present. Peanut shells have practically no feeding value because it takes as much energy to digest and absorb them as is present in their make-up. A test with a peanutmeal that ran a little less than 40 percent protein at the Iowa station recently showed that, as compared to corn and tankage, peanut meal in this case being fed with corn, all feeds being fed free-choice style, the daily gains were slightly less or 1.33 as compared to 1.41 pounds. These rations were fed on bluegrass pasture. Figuring the peanutmeal against the corn and tankage we find that 100 pounds of it saved 48 pounds of corn and 45 pounds of tankage, a total of 93 pounds of feed. If the corn is worth 3 cents a pound or $1.68 a bushel and the tankage 5 cents a pound in this test, the peanut meal had a value of $3.69 per 100 pounds, which is a rather high value and perhaps more thai! it is worth. It does show, however, that it can be used to advantage in swine husbandry. We have before indi- cated that peanut meal which has the oil pressed out produces a satisfactory fat pork, and this is of great moment. However, the raw peanuts with their high percentage (as high as 40 percent sometimes) of fat or oil produce a very oily and undesirable fat pork known as "oily or soft" pork. Peanut meal clearly excels linseed oilmeal when used as a lone supplement to corn on blue- grass pasture, but then in this case if a little tankage had been added to both the rations, the one containing linseed oilmeal and the one containing peanut meal along with corn, or even a little milk, we think much better actual as well as more favorable com- parative results would have been secured. Generally speaking, we find that with every 100 pounds of corn pigs eat from two and one- half to three times as much peanut meal in proportion as they do of meatmeal tankage. A happy mixture of the two should work well in practice. Oats. Oats are too fibrous to be used to marked advantage. There is a big difference in the amount of hull present in oats of the different varities and grown under different conditions. Northern oats are best because they are more plump, and weigh heavier to the bushel. One should always prefer the heaviest oats for swine production. Hull-less oatmeal or hull-less oats are much more valuable, pound for pound, than whole oats. For very young, growing pigs some prefer to take the hulls from the oats, and this is good practice. Oats are not very palatable for pigs when fed in large quantities. Oats must be ground and pref- 160 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS erably soaked in order to get the most good out of them, and then when they are soaked and the hulks come to the top they can be skimmed off and fed to dry cows or horses. Grinding pays big returns if oats are to be fed. As a fattening ration oats are a dis- appointment. They are not so valuable as corn, being for fatten- ing from 60 to 80 percent as good; hence it can readily be seen that oats can seldom be used as a finishing substitute for corn. Oats are much better for horses and calves than for pigs. In lim- ited quantity they can be fed to brood sows particularly. They can be scattered about so as to induce exercise, but if allowed at the rate of more than 1 pound daily the practice of feeding ordinary oats is somewhat wasteful, particularly when corn can be bought, .pound for pound, at the same price or even at a 10 percent greater price. With our broodsows we have found that oats only added to a corn ration caused the litters to come weak, as when corn alone is fed, and the sows did not do well. When fed along with a little tankage and the major portion of the ration made up of corn it was a splendid feed. It must be fed in limited quantities and pre- sumably ground, although in practice whole oats are splendid when scattered about in the feedlots to induce exercise. It has an indirect advantage in this respect. Oats and tankage fed without any other feeds excepting salt have been disappointing to us for brood sows. This ration has not produced good, strong litters. Hull-less Oatmeal. This is a good feed. It is surprising what a difference it makes to take the hulls off oats and leave a by-pro- duct such as this. We compared hull-less oatmeal and tankage with corn and tankage and found that about 110 pounds of oat- meal were required to equal 100 pounds of corn on bluegrass pas- ture. The gains were a little slower, but the pigs did well. We think it best, however, fed as a partial feed in conjunction with corn and tankage or. corn and milk. On rape pasture where we made the same comparisons we found that hull-less oatmeal had a value a little higher than corn, pound for pound. Thus it made a splendid showing, and rape made the difference. It is surpris- ing to know just what a big difference the addition of one feed to a ration will make. It emphasizes how little we really know about the actions and reactions of specific feeds. At present oatmeal cannot be bought from the cereal manufacturers because it is be- ing converted into human food. Wheat Middlings. This is a very good feed. It is hardly worth while to discuss it because its value is known by practically everyone. Used as a part of the ration it is splendid. We prefer the floury sorts of middlings to those that have considerable bran in them. In truth, the more bran there is in them the less palatable they are, and the less efficient, pound for pound. As a substitute for corn wheat middlings are a disappointment. We have found in some of our tests where we compared, for instance, wheat mid- dlings and tankage with corn and tankage on bluegrass pasture, that it took 159 pounds of standard wheat middlings to equal 100 PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 161 pounds of corn, and in carrying the pigs from weaning time to 225 pounds in weight it took 225 days on wheat middlings ; whereas on corn it took 143 days where tankage was fed in addition. The wheat middlings group did very well in the early part of the feed- ing period, but when the pigs reached a weight of about 160 pounds they began to do poorly, from the fattening standpoint, presum- ably because of the fibrous content of the middlings. They simply could not keep up with the corn and tankage-fed pigs. Middlings are palatable to all classes of swine and are particularly good for the boar and brood sow when fed in conjunction with meat prod- ucts, milk products, or good pastures. Wheat Bran. This is a bulky, fibrous feed, more adaptable to the dairy cow than to swine in general, although the brood sow can use some to advantage sometimes. Wheat bran is good in overcoming constipation, and, generally speaking, is a better medi- cine than feed for swine. There are so many feeds that are better for young, growing pigs than bran that we would discourage the use of the wheat bran, excepting as a medicine. Cottonseed Meal. This swine feed is used to considerable advantage in the south, but not very much in the northern sec- tions. If it comprises much of the ration for any considerable time, pigs are liable to be lost from its use. So far it has not been demonstrated with swine that the poisonous effects of cottonseed- meal can be obviated in any major quantity for any considerable period of time, soaking, cooking and other remedies having been tried. Iron sulphate mixed with cottonseedmeal is said to be of value, but some cast a question on its efficacy. Anyhow, cotton- seedmeal has not made much of an inroad into the corn-balancing competition with our substantial supplementary feeds for swine production, although it is used largely in the feeding of cattle. We recommend to those who would use cottonseed meal that they alter- nate it in the ration, feeding it for say two weeks and then discon- tinuing it for say two weeks, alternating with meatmeal tankage or milk or linseed oilmeal. Cull Beans. Beans are good for pork production, but had best be cooked. They should also be fed as a partial ration. In prac- tice considerable baking soda mixed with beans in cooking is said to be of much advantage. Ordinarily culled beans can be bought in the northeastern section of America to good advantage, but in the cornbelt it is seldom that we see them. Gluten Feed. This feed has been disappointing in its results with swine. It is a much better cattle and sheep feed. Swine do not relish it when fed alone, although when mixed with milk they take to it. As a lone supplement to corn it is inefficient and should not be used in drylot in that manner. It is quite fibrous; in fact, almost too much so for ideal fattening purposes. Our best results have been secured with gluten feed when it has been mixed with tankage, half and half, and allowed on rape pasture. In this case 162 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS it was worth the money (1917) when fed in conjunction with corn We tried it as a complete substitute for corn on rape, but the results were unsatisfactory. In drylot we fed gluten feed mixed with tankage, half and half, in conjunction with corn, both being allowed free-choice style. On corn and tankage it took 136 days to take fall pigs from 52 to 250 pounds, requiring 360 pounds of com plus 35 pounds of tankage, a total of 396 pounds of feed. Where the tankage was mixed with gluten feed, half and half, it took 150 days or two weeks longer, and the feed requirement was 350 pounds of corn plus 40 pounds of gluten feed plus 40 pounds of meatmeal tankage a total of 430 pounds. In this instance the 40 pounds of gluten feed saved 10 pounds of corn, but lost 4 pounds of tankage, in addition to its taking more time in feeding. This is interesting testimony, but we hope to show some day just how glu- ten feed can be used to better advantage than we have been able to demonstrate so far. With cattle and sheep we have found that it works well in certain situations. Feeders have not been slow to appreciate that corn gluten feed is all right when put in its right place. Corn Oil Cakemeal. Corn oil cakemeal is a much different feed from corn gluten feed because it comprises the germs of the corn with the oil pressed out. Gluten feed, on the other hand, is really the bran plus the flinty portions of the kernel plus the so- called corn solubles, these being secured from the big tanks in which the corn is previously soaked to soften it. The solution taken from the tanks is really a sulphurous acid solution, the sulphur having been burned and the resultant fumes therefrom run into the water solution in order to make the sulphurous acid, which acid prevents fermentation, and thus allows the corn to soften without spoiling. It is then ready for the manufacturing process, degerm- inating and crushing. This preliminary soaking solution is evap- orated down, and then added to the bran and flinty portions of the corn kernel to make the gluten feed. Strictly speaking, corn gluten feed does not contain any of the germs, although some concerns are said to include them. This germ inclusion should be helpful. Corn oil cake meal has nutritious properties differing from gluten feed, and we have found that it is especially valuable in saving meatmeal tankage when added to a corn and meatmeal tankage ration. A number of our Iowa station tests show clearly that 100 pounds of corn oilcakemeal added to a corn and meatmeal tankage ration on timothy pasture has been instrumental in saving 80 pounds of corn and 40 pounds of tankage, a total of 120 pounds of feed. The following figures gathered by the author, in conjunc- tion with Dunn, covering this point are of interest: Corn Oil Cake as a Partial Tankage Substitute Six 50-Pound Weanling Pigs to Each Group 110 Days June 15 to Oct. 3, 1917 PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 163 Feed Required for a Hundred Pounds Gain: Th<* Average Group Average Final Weight Per Pig Daily Gain Shelled Corn Meatmeal Tankage Corn Oil Cake Meal Total I 170 1.11 347 45 None 392 II 183 1.22 303 19 58 380 III 201 1.38 325 42 6 373 One can use corn oilcakemeal in limited quantities mixed with tankage. We have found it also works well with milk, when we are depending on supplements to corn. Corn oilcakemeal alone, however, is disappointing. It and tankage do not work well to- gether, but corn, corn oilcakemeal and tankage make a splendid combination when properly compounded. Alfalfa Hay. Alfalfa hay has a wide field of usefulness in the ration of the brood sow. This is true in the western as well as the eastern and central states. It can be placed in a rack, and ordinarily brood sows will eat enough of it to balance the corn or other grain ration which they receive. We want to be sure, how- ever, that the sows receiving the basal grains such as corn, barley, wheat, without other supplements, eat at least 1 pound of alfalfa hay per head daily; if they do not, difficulties at farrowing time may be experienced, as evidenced by small and weak pigs. We have ground alfalfa and mixed it with the corn ration and secured excellent results. Some figures on the use of alfalfa as a brood sow ration are interesting. They follow: Use Alfalfa When Feeding the Brood Sow Results Animal Husbandry Section of the Iowa Experiment Station Ration Fed Average Daily Gain Average Feed Eaten Daily Size of New- Born Pigs Weight Average Strength of Pigs Feed Cost of New Born Pig Cents Corn (Shelled Basis) Supple- ment Strong Medium Weak or Dead Ear corn only Ear corn plus 13 per cent tankage . Ear corn plus al- falfa in a rack. . . . .35 .63 .63 3.65 2.75 3.74 None .43 1.11 1.74 2.23 2.29 Per Cent 68 93 89 Per Cent 16 5 8 16 2 3 41 22 26 A little tankage fed along with the basal grain feed and alfalfa helps out as does a little milk. Alfalfa hay is not well adapted to fattening hogs, although it has been used in Nebraska with fairly good results. We must emphasize the point, however, that swine must not be made to eat it too closely. The leaves are much bet- ter than the stem portions, which are too fibrous. 164 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS Roots. Roots are splendid for swine production where they can be grown to advantage. They have nutritional values entirely out of proportion to their dry matter content when viewed in a practical sense. The Danish people have done considerable work with roots. They find that 1 pound of grain was replaced by 4 pounds of sugar beets or 5 pounds of fodder beets or 6% to 7% pounds of mangel beets. It will be seen from this that roots really are instrumental in saving grain. In some situations like in the northern sections of the country, where roots grow to good advan- tage, as in Canada, they have a profitable field of usefulness, par- ticularly for brood sows and maintenance stock. Miscellaneous Feeds. Oat hulls are a poor swine feed, really practically worthless. Acorns are splendid where they can be found in abundance, particularly when the hogs gather them them- selves. They produce a soft, oily pork, however, and need to be balanced with good supplements, as corn. In acorn feeding, the pigs should be hardened with good hardening feeds, such as corn, barley or similar feeds. Peanut hulls are not adapted for swine feeding. They are too coarse, rough and fibrous. Corn silage, is too bulky and fibrous for hogs. Its greatest field of usefulness is with brood sows. When corn silage is offered to hogs they . usually prefer to eat the corn first and then maybe a little of the leaves. If they are kept real hungry, they will of course eat considerably more, but this is not a profitable procedure. Garbage. Garbage is a splendid swine feed. It can be utilized with swine to good advantage. It takes from 5 to 8 pounds of garbage to equal 1 pound of mixed grain. To feed garbage suc- cessfully it should be fed in large quantities, and kept before pigs practically all of the time. Fattening hogs should not be made to clean it up too closely. Better let the brood sows and the stock hogs clean it up after the fattening hogs have eaten the best. Gar- bage-hogs should be immunized, because there is more danger from cholera in garbage feeding than from ordinary grain feeding. Gar- bage hogs shrink on going to market, and do not dress out so high as grain-fed hogs, but ordinary kitchen garbage produces a good quality of pork. If garbage, however, were made up of acorns and peanuts and other soft pork-producing feeds, one could hardly say that it would be good in its effects on the pork. Inasmuch as there are garbages and garbages it is difficult to say much about the quality of pork it will produce unless one knows the kind of garbage. Condimental Feeds. Condimental stock feeds usually are to be discouraged in swine production, because they are commonly bought on faith. They are a mixture of many ingredients and hence have the disadvantages of mixtures. They consist of ingredi- ents that oftentimes have not been demonstrated to be necessary. They may be " guess " mixtures. They are sold by experienced salesmen, usually, and that means that the buyer must * ' look out. ' ' PRINCIPAL SWINE FEEDS AND THEIR USE 165 They are relatively expensive, and generally are a poor gamble. This does not mean, however, that a condiment cannot be made that will be useful, particularly when it is made up of those feeds that we know are good in practice, such as salt, wood ashes, charcoal and other feeds, but, generally speaking, one " jumps in the dark" when buying these feeds. It is surprising how little we know about feeds and feeding. We must still place much dependence on the appetite of the pig for different feeds, and learn to depend on those feeds in a large measure that have given success in our practical experience, but ever and anon keeping our periscope polished up and in use, looking for a better way, realizing always, however, that there is danger in showing too much interest in any feeds that are made to sell for a profit rather than to get economic and physio- logical returns. The standard feeds are the ones' to bank on in major swine feeding operations. There are good commercial by- products that are made into fine feeds, however, such as meatmeal tankage, hominy feed, hull-less oatmeal, bloodmeal, buttermilk pow- der, bonemeal, fishmeal and many others, and these should receive our patronage where conditions warrant their use. But bank on home-grown feeds as a rule. For the major portion of the basal as well as the main supply of the supplementary feeds depend on corn, barley, alfalfa, clover, rape and similar feeds, and buy the best you can find to round out your ration, keeping in mind not the idea of the "price per ton" but the "return for dollars in- vested." To emphasize this bear in mind that meatmeal tankage that costs $110 a ton in war as well as in normal times is better than peanut hulls, even though they be given to you, if you use both as pig feeds to balance ordinary grains. CHAPTER IV THE FREE-CHOICE SYSTEM Let us fix in our minds at the outset what we mean by the free- choice system of feeding. This system, experimentally demonstrated and developed by the Animal Husbandry Section of the Iowa Ex- periment Station, is one wherein the animals fed are allowed to have the feeds placed before them in separate containers, so that they may choose or partake of whichever they will. These feeds may be continuously kept before them or they may be allowed peri- odically. In the former case the system then would be free-choice self -fed, but in the latter free-choice hand-fed. In the former case self-feeders with different feeds within will be placed before the animals, and in the latter open troughs would naturally be used, each containing a separate feed, these to be placed before the ani- mals, which will eat what they will, and after a certain limited time, say an hour or two, or at such times that the animals are satisfied, the troughs may be removed, to be replaced again at a later period. Self -feeding may be practiced with a mixture of feeds; in other words, corn 90 parts and tankage 10 parts, both ground and mixed together, may be fed in an open container. On the other hand, these feeds might be fed free-choice style, both in separate troughs. Let us not, therefore, confuse self -feeding with free-choice feeding : they are two separate and distinct plans. Does Self-Feeding Pay? It does, particularly when one wishes to fatten animals. One can even self-feed brood sows, and this is consistently done on pasture, the pasture in this case being self -fed, or sows may be self-fed on alfalfa hay allowed in a rack, or ground alfalfa mixed with the grain ration, and so on. But in these cases the character of the feeds is such that when self -fed they do not unduly fatten. When we wish to self-feed fattening animals we instinctively use the most highly concentrated feeds, such as Indian corn, milk, and meatmeal tankage, white flour middlings, young tender alfalfa, rape, or clover, and other pastures, and so on. In all of our tests with self-feeding versus hand-feeding, when we used a ration the basis of which was corn those with young growing and fattening pigs as well as for fattening shotes and fattening sows have practically all shown up in favor of self -feeding, in that there is a greater average daily gain made, more feed eaten daily, and less feed required for 100 pounds of gain by the self -fed group. This of course means greater profit on the pig, if any profit is made, and that at less labor cost. Returns From Experiments. It would be superfluous to set out even a small portion of our experiments, but we are giving a couple which illustrate the practicability of self-feeding. In one experiment where we fattened well-grown yearling hogs weighing 166 THE FREE-CHOICE SYSTEM 167 about 125 pounds, self-feeding them for a period of 76 days, the groups self -fed and hand- fed respectively, both given corn, showed results as follows : The self-fed pigs -outgained the hand-fed pigs, making 2.05 as compared to 1.87 pounds daily more than a 10 percent increase; ate more feed daily, showing that under this system of feeding they could work at higher speed, or 9.21 pounds as compared to 8.79 pounds daily per hog, an increase of close to 5 percent; required less feed for 100 pounds of gain, or 449 pounds as compared to 469, a saving of 20 pounds of corn on every 100 pounds of gain produced when the animals were self -fed as when compared to where they were hand-fed twice daily. At another 4ime young two and one-half-month-old pigs were taken and during the first 100 days of the trial the self-fed group, which was given shelled corn, wheat middlings, and tankage in separate feeders, gained 1.13 pounds, requiring 408 pounds of feed for 100 pounds of gain. The group fed three times a day gained practically the same (they were fed free-choice style also, feed being placed before them three times a day, in open troughs) ; but required 10 pounds more feed for 100 pounds of gain, namely, 418. The third group fed twice a day gained more than 10 percent less rapidly or .59 of a pound daily and required 430 pounds of feed for 100 pounds of gain. Peculiarly enough the gains were more expensive in the hand-fed groups because they ate a larger portion of the expensive feeds, namely, of wheat middlings and tankage in proportion to corn. This is what should be expected on physiolog- ical and general nutritional grounds. Self-Feeders on Pasture. On pasture we have fed some groups, self -feeding them as compared to full-feeding them by hand, with gratifying results for self-feeding. One summer on timothy- clover pasture two groups were fed, one receiving a self-fed free- choice ration of corn and tankage, and the other a full-fed ration of corn hand-fed plus as much tankage in addition two times daily as was eaten by the self -fed free-choice group. These pigs were started out when they weighed 53 pounds and were fed from July 6 to Nov. 13 on pasture, and if at the close of the pasture season the pigs in each group did not average 225 pounds they were con- tinued until they did. The figures therefore, taking the pigs from 53 up to 225 pounds, show that where they were self-fed free-choice style it took 120 days as compared to 148 days where they were hand full-fed. Tankage was kept the same. The big difference then is in the amount of corn allowed and in the method of its allowance. Of course where they are self-fed they eat much more than where they are hand-fed, because they have it continuously before them and they can eat night or day. Here is a saving by self -feeding of some 28 days, or practically a month. This means considerable in the fall in getting pigs off to market, because the market begins to decline in September and usually hits the bottom along in January or February, and every day that a man keeps his pigs after September he is keeping them on a steadily declining market. This statement is based on the average of a number of years. 168 : _ . HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS In regard to the feed for a 100 pounds of gain, the self -fed group took 353.1 pounds of shelled corn as contrasted with 389.1 pounds where they were hand full-fed twice daily. Here is a difference of 36 pounds of grain on every 100 pounds of gain saved by self-feed- ing. This is just on .the corn, yet there was also a saving of tankage, self-feeding requiring 26.9 pounds as compared to 31.2 where hand- fed, a difference of 4.3 pounds on every 100 pounds of gain. Actu- ally less pasture was required for 100 pounds of gain where the animals were self-fed than where they were hand-fed, or .012 as compared to .013 acre. In other words, it took a twelfth more pas- ture for every 100 pounds of gain where the animals were hand- fed, simply because during the nights and the middle of the day, when there was nothing else to eat, they would eat pasture, and also because, under this system of feeding (that is, hand-feeding), they actually require more total protein supplement daily per pig to balance the ration than where self-fed, hence eat more pasture ; but this has a nutritional basis which is too complicated to enter into here. Beginnings of the Free-Choice System. In the Proceedings of the American Society of Animal Production in 1916 and 17 there appeared two papers, one entitled "The Pig Versus the Feeding Standards," and the other "The Pig Versus the Feeding Stand- ards: Further Progress," both being contributed by the writer from the Animal Husbandry Section of the Iowa Experimental Sta- tion. In those papers is given the results of taking j)igs on the feeding standards versus the free-choice system up to the age of 8 months, taking the pigs when they were 2% months of age. The method of feeding was as follows : Lot I, free-choice system (self- fed). Shelled corn self -fed plus wheat middlings self -fed plus tankage self-fed. Lot II, same as Lot I, excepting hand-fed three times daily. Lot III, same as Lot I, excepting hand-fed two times daily. Lot IV, Dietrich or Illinois system, hand-fed twice daily the same feeds as used in Lots, I, II, and III, these being all mixed together before feeding; water allowed at free-will. (The Dietrich system was worked out by Dietrich, formerly of the Illinois Experi- ment Station, after 10 years of laborious investigation.) Lot V, same as Lot IV, excepting that water was limited according to standard. Dietrich would weigh the water also and apportion it on a certain specific basis. Lot VI, Kellner system, a German sys- tem of recent origin. Hand-fed twice daily the same feeds as in other lots, all mixed, however, before feeding. Lot VII, Wolff- Lehmann system, also a German standard of "old-time" origin. The same feeds fed as in other lots, but all mixed together, accord- ing to this standard so much of protein, carbohydrates, fats, and so on, in feed for each 100 pounds of pig daily as per standard. It differs somewhat from the Dietrich and Kellner standard in method of procedure, and so on. Lot VIII, free-choice mixture of the feeds used above, this mixture being based on the average as consumed by similar pigs when self-fed free-choice style, which mixture was 89 parts shelled corn (ground after the first 60 days THE FREE-CHOICE SYSTEM 169 to keep the pigs from sorting out the tankage and middlings which they preferred), 5 parts wheat middlings, and 6 parts of tankage, all thoroughly mixed together and self-fed. Inasmuch as 225 pounds is a handy marketable weight, the fig- ures represented pigs taken to that weight, but remember, before we study the following table, to note that after we had continued ^these standards six months the pigs were all put upon self-feeders and allowed the feeds free-choice style in each group. When this change took place it was marvelous to note how the groups previ- ously fed according to the artificialized standards began to improve, making more rapid gains that before, and, generally speaking, re- quiring less feed for 100 pounds of gain. The table gives the re- sults as regards the pounds of feed eaten daily per animal during the period from the beginning of the test until they weighed 225 pounds ; also the number of days required until they reached that weight, this being based on the actual age of the pigs : AVERAGEIPOUNDS TOTAL DAILY FEED EATEN PER HOG DURING PERIOD The Group Days Re- quired (Age in Days) Up to 225 Pounds Up to 300 Pounds Actual Per 100 Pounds Live Weight Actual Per 100 Pounds Live Weight I II III IV V VI VII VIII 229 234 250 256 268 271 294 276 5.363 5.434 5.087 4.919 4.800 4.436 3.994 4.358 4.348 4.353 4.120 4.072 3.892 3.649 3.489 3.719 5. "307 5.480 5.379 5.319 5.159 4.929 4.521 4.645 2.999 3.155 3.260 3.365 3.096 3.202 3.152 3.017 This table in itself is better appreciated on close study. Note that the least number of days are required in the three free-choice groups fed (Lots I, II, and III), whether self -fed or hand-fed, and that the feeding standards were good, depending on their chrono- logical origin; in other words, the newer standards are the best. We can more thoroughly appreciate this table in comparison with one other. The following table shows the feed required for 100 pounds of gain in the various groups, taking the groups up to 225 pounds in weight : FEED REQUIRED FOR 100 POUNDS OF GAIN UP TO 225 POUNDS The Group Shelled Corn (14% Moisture) Wheat Middlings Meatmeal Tankage Bone Ash Char- coal Rock Salt Total I II III IV V VI VII VIII 356.09 350.77 359.79 391.31 402.80 352.58 379.68 417.46 44.83 52.83 65.82 44.50 44.58 55.29 46.29 22.70 43.49 48.31 49.47 43.51 45.00 56.94 42.37 29.66 .07 .03 .12 .07 .03 .12 .05 .03 .12 .11 .09 .06 .23 .19 .35 .37 .14 .09 .09 .12 .11 .05 .04 .06 444.74 452.14 475.40 479.56 492 75 465.16 468.79 470.28 170 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS Note here again that the least feed was required for 100 pounds of gain in the self -fed free-choice group. It is well here to repro- duce in closing the free-choice system discussion a part of the sum- mary and some suggestions presented before the American Society of Animal Production by the author in 1916. Summary and Suggestions.. 1. The free-choice system for growing and fattening weanling pigs has a great field of usefulness, because it enables swinemen to secure approximately maximum growth and development on pigs. 2. The appetite of the pig is apparently a fairly reliable guide as to bodily needs ; at least it appears to be quite trustworthy with certain combinations of feeds. 3. The feeding standards, although actually quite easily un- derstood, are nevertheless considered bothersome, difficult of exe- cution and complex by the average swine feeding layman. The free-choice system of swine feeding stands out in remarkable con- trast because of its simplicity. 4. Broadly speaking, the feeding standards are relatively valu- able in the order of their chronological origin. In their application to cornbelt lard-type swine the newest standard the Illinois or Dietrich (water preferably allowed at free-will) appears best" adapted in taking pigs from weaning time until they reach 8 months of age. The Kellner comes next, and the Wolff -Lehmann, the oldest, last. 5. The great question as regards the best measure. of value or the best yardstick to use in determining which system or standard is most efficient is ever with us. Shall success be measured by: (a) Daily gain or days required to reach a certain weight or finish; or (b) feed consumption ability; or (c) feed required for a unit gain, both quantitatively and qualitatively speaking; or (d) the degree of health and immunization against disease; or (e) the net resulting carcass with its smoothness, muscular or fatty de.velop- ment, hardness or softness, and other variable characteristics; or (f) longevity; or (g) reproductive ability? Fashions change; the carcass that is best today may be economically wrong tomorrow. The ideals we picture in the morning often become altered through the progress of the day, so that when the shades of night come we have a different idealistic endpoint. From man's standpoint, the feed consumed per unit gain, the daily gain, the final product and the healthiness of the pigs are major considerations, but from the standpoint of the pig, health, longevity, and reproduction should mean most to the porcine race. 6. Disappointment should not be felt if sow or boar pigs in- tended for breeding fatten and mature quickly when opportunity is provided, as in the free-choice self-feeding system. We have selected cornbelt swine for many generations, emphasizing early maturity. If our stock did not mature readily when given the THE FREE-CHOICE SYSTEM 171 opportunity, that is, when provided with an abundance of suitable concentrated feeds, we relegated them to the discard, selecting only those for breeders which would under these conditions finish quickly and nicely. To prevent undue fattening, therefore, we must provide inhibitors to overcome long years of effective selec- tion ; inhibitors such as limited feed, bulky feed, and others. 7. Apparently for the most perfect development there should be many feeding standards devised, the number necessary depend- ing on the goals sought. It may be advisable to have a standard for six-month feeding or eight-month feeding; or, on the basis of weight, one suitable for carrying pigs to 225 pounds; another to 300 pounds, and still others to other weights. 8. Pigs held back or retarded in their growth (provided retardation is not too severe) may catch up in weight later if nu- tritive conditions are abundantly improved. To the judge of live stock the conformation of the retarded pigs, after their develop- ment, appears somewhat different, being more refined in a certain sense than that of pigs fed normally. This retardation may be brought about in numerous ways, but it is interesting to note that pigs, even though self-fed, may be retarded greatly when the feeds allowed are exceptionally good in quality but wrongly mixed. 9. The character of the feeds used, as well as their kind, affect the feeding standard requirement. So long as we depend on ap- proximate group values, as measured by the bread terms protein, nitrogen-free extract, crude fiber, ether extract, and so on, so long will we secure widely variable and disappointing results. 10. Our observations suggest strongly that the type of pig used will surprisingly affect the feeding standard requirement. Apparently there should be a standard for every type. 11. In short, the feeding standard requirement is altered by many outstanding factors: (a) The goal sought as regards age, weight, finish, final product, and other essentials; (b) type and breeding of pigs used; (c) character and quality of feeds depended upon; (d) methods of feeding, as times per day, soaking, grinding, cooking and slopping; (e) systems of management, as exercise, control, housing conditions, castration and spaying; (f) health, thriftiness and natural vigor (disease infection and parasitic infes- tation play an important role), and (g) climate. There may be others. 12. Practice, has changed wonderfully in the last 100 years as regards market weights of swine. In the old days it was not un- usual to market entire droves of hogs weighing 500, 600 and even up to 800 and 900 pounds. To make such hogs roughing was in order. These studies tend to emphasize the correctness of that scheme. But there has been a great change in market fashion, so that nowadays the average marketable handy weight of 225 pounds is in most consistent demand. To meet new demands we must 172 HOW TO FEED YOUR HOGS devise different methods and modem methods. It is apparent that the man in the field has not altered his methods of feeding to keep pace with market changes and demands. Hence the reason why self-feeding pigs to handy weights has been long neglected. In- stinctively we tend to do things as our fathers and grandfathers did them, but this may sometimes be a virtue ; so too such imitation of methods may seriously retard real progress. 13. The development of the free-choice system of swine feed- ing marks another stepping stone in progress toward more efficient methods of swine feeding. It provides a new viewpoint, a new attitude, a new basis for thought and action. It is profitable to look forward to the development of the best possible free-choice system; in the meantime keeping clearly and steadfastly in mind that we can improve upon the pigs ' own method of selection. Self -Feeding Don'ts. In closing the chapter it may be well to repeat a few self-feeding "don'ts" which are to the point: Don't depend absolutely on the self-feeder for all classes and kinds of swine. Don't self -feed if you don't want relatively rapid gains, or if you wish to grow pigs along slowly unless of course you use bulky feeds, such as pasture or hay. Don't self-feed pregnant sows on highly-concentrated feed, excepting early in the breeding season, or unless you mix bulky feeds, such as ground oats, alfalfa meal, or bran with feeds. Don't expect the self-feeder to save all the work, because it won't. Don't think that although the "self " method works out meritoriously in many circumstances with hogs, that the same would be true of beef and dairy cattle, horses, sheep, poultry and goats. Don't always expect the hog econom- ically to balance the ration, no matter what feeds you allow. The hog is not an economist; he is a physiologist by instinct; he will eat to suit himself, and if you feed him sugar he disregards the price. But it is surprising how well the hog likes corn. In the cornbelt it is the one great feed for swine, and is most admirably adapted to self-feeding. Don't you know that hogging-down corn is practiced by farmers because it pays? Don't you know that it is "the most natural self-feeder method" of harvesting corn? Don't expect pigs on dry, hard bluegrass to do well when self -fed on corn. Either "green-up" the grass or supply rape, alfalfa and the like. Don't self -feed and expect the optimum results unless you keep water before the hogs, so that they be continuously sat- isfied for drink. Don't self -feed tankage or meatmeal if you limit the corn ration and expect the pigs to eat as little as when self -fed. When the pig gets hungry, it is eat tankage or nothing, and he eats the tankage,, and the tankage consumption in this case is a little lighter, but it is now considered a fair practice to self-feed tank- age, even though the corn is hand full-fed, because we have learned that hogs which are receiving a somewhat limited ration of corn, limited by whatever means, actually require more protein feeds daily than when the corn is self -fed. Don't expect the self-feeder to be a panacea for all feeding troubles, because to expect that is to expect that the millennium has come. PART III BREED HISTORIES CHAPTER I THE BERKSHIRE By H. T. MORGAN Most authors take the position that the Berkshire is the oldest of the existing breeds of swine, and while its ancestry is somewhat obscured in antiquity I doubt whether it has a rightful claim to the title of being the oldest of the present-day breeds. Prior to about 1850 the Berkshire was not much like the pig of that name that we recognize today as the "aristocrat of the swine breed." Indeed it A Grand Champion Berkshire Boar was not until a number of years after 1850 that the black color, with "six white points," became well established, or "fixed" as a breed characteristic. During the past few years the writer has given a considerable amount of time and study to the work of compiling a history of Berkshires, and in his research has traveled some thousands of miles in visiting the older breeders in various parts of the United States. I have had much correspondence with breeders of Berkshires in England and Canada, and have had, I believe, access to most of the historical matter pertaining to the sub- ject on file in our large public libraries. Everybody knows that the native home of the Berkshire is in England, where it is supposed to have been developed as a breed in the counties of Berkshire and Wilts in the south-central part. Other neighboring counties were also prominently associated with the development of the breed. Back in 1789 Culley, a historian of note, wrote as follows : "The most noted breed of hogs in this Island is that excellent kind generally known as Berkshire pigs, now spread through almost 173 174 BREED HISTORIES every part of England, and some places in Scotland. They are in general reddish-brown, with black spots upon them, large ears, hanging over their eyes, short-legged, small-boned, and exceedingly inclined to make fat easily." Culley also testifies to the large weight of the breed, and men- tions animals weighing well over 1,100 pounds. Surely the fore- going description does not fit the present-day Berkshire. Early Improvement. The early improvement of the Berkshire was undoubtedly due to the .refining influence of a generous intro- duction of Chinese, Siamese and Neopolitan blood. In 1842 Prof. Low wrote as follows: "The Berkshire breed has, like every other, been crossed and recrossed with the Chinese, or Chinese crosses, so .as to lessen the size of the animals, and render them more suited to the demand which has arisen for small and delicate pork." In 1830, according to Youatt, the Berkshire was still classed as a larger hog, sandy or whitish-brown in color, spotted regularly with dark-brown or black, the body covered with long thin, soft hair (sometimes curly), and free from bristles. The ears were erect and fringed with long hair, the head and snout short, body thick and compact, legs short, skin thin and bacon of superior quality. At this period we see a long step in the line of improvement, but we of today would scarcely call such an animal a Berkshire. At that period (1830) it was regarded as "one of the best breeds in England." Pioneer Breeders. In my opinion it is to Heber Humfrey of England, J. C. Snell of Ontario and N. H. Gentry of Missouri to whom the greatest credit must be accorded in the later develop- ment of the modern Berkshire, and it is due to the constructive ability and persistent enterprise of these men that the type of the breed has become fully established and recognized throughout the world. Berkshires were first brought to America in 1823, accord- ing to A. B. Allen of New York. Mr. Allen was an admirer of the breed, and did much to encourage its early popularity in this coun- try. In 1841 he himself imported 41 head, after personally inspect- ing many of the British herds, and subsequently made other impor- tations. Commencing about 1840, many Berkshires found their way into Ohio, where they became popular in the great Miami Valley in the vicinity of Cincinnati, at that time the greatest corn and hog-pro- ducing section of the United States. The breed's popularity con- tinued to increase until about the time of the Civil War, when breeders, for some unaccountable reason, allowed their herds to degenerate, so that at the begining of about 1870 but few good representative specimens were available in this country. It was approximately in this period that John Snell of Canada imported his first "English Berkshires," and they soon attracted the atten- tion of N. H. Gentry, who, then a young man, went to Canada and brought home a. number of the best individuals from the Snell herd. It was early in the 70 's that T. S. Cooper of Pennsylvania imported a number of choice Berkshires from England, and it was "Cooper THE BERKSHIRE 175 in the East and Gentry in the West" who put Berkshires on the American map. An English Authority. One of the most interesting contribu- tions to the history of the breed is a letter which I received a year ago from Edgar Humfrey, secretary of the British Berkshire Society, whose father, the late Heber Humfrey, was the first sec- retary of the British Berkshire Society and the most noted breeder of Berkshires in his day. Edgar Humfrey at my request visited a number of the older breeders of Berkshires in hi$ country, and obtained from them valuable data with reference to the Berkshire of England from a time dating back as far as 60 3 r ears ago. These data supplemented by notes left by his late father, who began the active breeding of Berkshires in 1862, give a fund of authentic information which I believe should be preserved in book form. J. Pittman King of North Stoke, Wallingford, is the oldest living breeder of Berkshires in England today. He started his herd in 1862. He states that in 1850 there were in Berkshire, England, several large herds which had been carefully bred. These hogs possessed great length of body and rather long heads, with ears standing forward. The general color of these hogs was black, with occasional splashings of white, but at that period no special effort was being made to breed white points in any particular place. Mr. Pittman states that in about 1855 more attention was being given to setting a standing of white points on a black ground. Mr. King was one of the founders of the British Berkshire Society in 1884, several years after the American Berkshire Association was estab- lished. Russell Swanwick of Cirencester, another English breeder, en- gaged in the business in 1867, and is still in the ranks of active production. He states in 1867 that the color of the Berkshire in the middle 50 's was somewhat similar to that of the present. He also states that as late as 1870 certain crosses of the "small black ' : (originally the Chinese or Japanese breed) was introduced by cer- tain English breeders to check the apearance of too much white, which had appeared, due no doubt to a white or spotted cross, which had been used at an earlier date. He also believes that this black cross resulted in the modern shortened snout with its acute angle, the black wrinkled nose, and at the same time produced a consistently better crest. T. S. Cooper imported a large number of the best hogs bred by Mr. Swanwick in the early 70 's. Quoting from Mr. Humfrey 's letter: "In summing up the evidence of those in England who can speak with authority it is clear that the Berkshire was commencing to assume a separate stock of its own about 1830, and that it con- tinued to thrive with amazing fertility and ever-increasing quality over the next 15 years, when we find it in the hands of many enter* prising country gentry, who may be called the earliest pioneers of the breed, since it was in their time that the construction in color was definitely fixed, and bred to, and the type improved. In the next decade from 1860, several other well-known breeders came 176 BREED HISTORIES into the field. After 1870 many others followed and so on down to the present." Tribute to the Breed in England. Mr. Humfrey closes his let- ter with the following tribute to the accomplishments of the Berk- shire in his country: "If I may dwell for a moment on the con- spicuous outstanding merit of the Berkshire, apart from its perfect markings, beautiful outline and symmetry of body, it would be in reference to the wonderful way in which it has sustained and im- proved its fine proportions of fat and lean and good quality of bacon and pork during the past 50 years. For the most convincing evidence of this fact we need only see the results of the competitions, open to any breed or cross, at the great annual Smithfield Show in London. In the live classes since 1883 Berkshires have won the championship 15 times, and it has been awarded 7 times to a Berk- shire cross bred. In the carcass classes at the same show, 1904 to 1915, Berkshires won the championship and reserve for same every year. They have also won 40 out of 45 first prizes awarded in 12 years, the classes being open to all breeds. "What further proof need we that Berkshires are easily first for quality. ' ' White Berkshires. How many Americans are aware that white Berkshires were ever imported to this country? I have before me a copy of an agricultural paper published in 1842 at Cincinnati which describes an importation of white Berkshires which were brought into the Miami Valley that year. Portraits of other im- ported Berkshires of that period indicate that many of them were one-third to one-half white. Undoubtedly J" however, these were hogs from Berkshire County, England, and were of strains which entered but slightly into the composition of the present-day Berk- shire. It is not unlikely that these white hogs were the forbears of the Suffolks, or perhaps the Yorkshires of today. In Kentucky they have a breed of red hogs which they call Red Berkshires, but the writer has been unable to discover a single authentic record which would indicate that they have anything in common with the ancestry of the Berkshire. The evidence on which I base my opinion as to the purity of the Berkshire as a breed leads me to say that the breed today can boast a longer period of time without the introduction of outbreeding than any breed of swine in existence. A few years ago there was a far wider variation in type than is noticeable today, and it is my opinion that no breed, for the reasons mentioned, pos- sesses the prepotency of the Berkshire. CHAPTER II THE DUROC-JERSEY Accurate information of the origin of the Duroc-Jersey breed does not seem to be of record. It is generally supposed that this breed is strictly American, yet some information available seems to point to the fact that the original stock was imported at an early date. The best information available bears out the statement that originally there were two distinct families of this popular breed A Grand Champion Duroc Jersey Boar going under separate names, that of * ' Jersey Reds ' ' and ' ' Duroos. ' ' The name Jersey Red was probably given to this family by Joseph B. Lyman, a resident of New Jersey and an agricultural editor of the New York Tribune. Previous to this time the breed had been called Red Hogs. A Mr. Lippincott, of New Jersey was probably the first man to advertise these hogs as Jersey Reds. History records the fact that in 1832 there were a pair of red pigs shipped from England to New Jersey. Clark Pettis makes this statement. "Their unique color rendered them objects of special interest in a locality long noted for successful swine breeders and feeders, among whom had long existed a great spirit of rivalry % as to whom should annually win the honor of raising the best lot of hogs, making the greatest average weight at different ages for which prominent Philadelphia butchers paid advance prices." The Duroc family were so called by Isaac Frink, of Milton, Sara- toga county, New York. Mr. Frink visited the farm of Harry Kel- 177 178 BREED HISTORIES sey, of Florida, N. Y., who was the owner of a noted stallion named Duroc. While on this visit Mr. Frink saw a litter of ten red pigs, the production of a pair brought by Mr. Kelsey from Oyster Bay, N. Y., or imported from England. Information available shows that Mr. Kelsey told Mr. Frink they were imported, but it is pos- sible that the term was misused. Farmers and hog growers were very much impressed with the productive power of these red pigs and they were much sought after, taking the name of Duroc because of the noted stallion owned by Mr. Kelsey. It seems that the Duroc family of red hogs at this time possessed more quality and probably finer bone than the Jersey Bed but in the course of time the two families were inter-bred with the result of a larger hog with more quality that seemed to meet with great favor wherever they were known and later on assumed the name of Duroc-Jerseys. The older breeders and growers of hogs well remember the time when the Duroc-Jersey hog was a curiosity at our larger state fairs. It is well within the memory of many of the breeders who are actively breeding Duroc-Jerseys today that one who would have the nerve to take an exhibit of them to a fair was regarded as being fanatical. The fact remains, however, that these men were not fanatics, but showed genuine judgment in the selection of this breed. We know of one particular locality where some twenty-four years ago a breeder bought a pure-bred Duroc-Jersey sow and began the production of this breed. At that time there was not another Duroc- hog within fourteen miles of this man's farm. Inquiry of the hog buyer at the town where this man lived recently revealed the fact that at the present time 85 per cent of all the hogs shipped from this town to market were solid red. What was done in popularizing the breed in this particular locality has been done in many of the best hog growing districts throughout the United States. Farmers and hog growers never would have taken hold of this breed of hogs and promoted them to the extent they have unless there was genuine merit and feeding qualities to warrant the effort. In practically all of the leading hog shows throughout the United States the numbers of Duroc-Jerseys are equal to that of any other breed; in many of these shows there are more Duroc- Jerseys shown than any other breed and in some of the leading shows as many as all other breeds combined. The visitor to these fairs will bear out the statement that in these large numbers shown they will find quality in proportion to numbers. In recent years there are many parts of the United States in which hogs are being successfully grown that a few years ago were not producing any. The popular Duroc-Jersey breed will be found in practically all of these new localities. The farmer and hog grower of today whether he be located in a new locality or an old one recognizes the fact that in order to succeed as he should he must produce the best. In starting his business he gives the matter of breed selection careful attention. The very fact that as we have stated that this careful attention to breed selection has been given THE DUROC-JERSEY 179 and that Duroc-Jerseys have been found in these localities shows that they are one of the breeds for maximum profit. In the leading barrow shows throughout the United States, Duroc-Jersey barrows are carrying away their full share of the honors, in singles, pens and car-load classes. CHAPTER III THE CHESTER WHITE As the earliest swine writers make no mention of a native Amer- ican hog, and as the Chester White breed is an American product, it follows that we must look for the source of the origin of the breed to the progeny of swine that were brought over from the European countries by the earliest settlers in America. An analysis of the common stock, as found in New England and Pennsylvania, A Prize Winning Chester White Sow early in the nineteenth century, from which stock the breed evi- dently had its origin, shows that they possessed the characteristics of the early English white breeds, as the Yorkshire, Lincolnshire and Cheshire. Authors agree as to the English origin of the Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, but as to the origin of the Cheshire opinions dif- fer. Be that as it may, the origin of the large white hog as found in Chester Co., Pa., early in the nineteenth century is partly accred- ited to the blood of the Cheshire hog. These Pennsylvania hogs were white, very large, bony, coarse, muscular and only showed good feeding qualities when matured, or nearly so. Some of them dressed over 1,000 pounds. Early Improvement. The first impulse toward the most suc- cessful improvement of these large hogs is accredited to Capt. James Jeffries, who introduced a pair of fine white pigs, known as the Woburn, from Bedfordshire, England, and located them on his farm in Chester Co., Pa., in 1818. The Woburn was of the smaller, 180 THE CHESTER WHITE . 181 compact type, a quick maturing animal, of good disposition and an excellent feeder. The constructive breeders of Chester and Delaware counties, in Pennsylvania soon realized that by crossing Bedfordshire or Woburn hogs on the best white hogs of the county great improvement was made, and by selection and judicious breed- ing for thirty years a hog was developed that would reproduce its characteristics to such a degree that it became known as a distinct breed, and was named in 1848 " Chester^ County White." which soon became generally known as "Chester White." It has the distinction of being the first named American-made breed of swine. A Breeder's Description. A brief description of these hogs by Paschall Morris of Philadelphia, a breeder of that period, says : * * They are generally recognized now as the best breed in this coun- try, coming fully up to the requirements of a farmer 's hog, and are rapidly superseding Suffolks, Berkshires and other smaller breeds. The best specimens may be described as long and deep in the car- cass, broad and straight in the back, short in the leg, full in the ham, full shoulder, well packed forward, admitting of no neck, very small proportionate head, short nose, dish face, broad between the ej'es, moderate ear, thin skin, straight hair, a capacity for great size and to gain a pound per day until they are two years old. Add to these quiet habits and an easy taking on of fat, so as to admit of being slaughtered at almost any age, and we have what is considered in Chester county a carefully-bred animal and what is known elsewhere as a fine specimen of a breed called * Chester County White/ ! As the different hogs from which the breed was created were all white, or nearly so, its power to transmit a pure white coat on any outcross was the pride of the originators and supporters, and much has been said of the white coat and the pink skin of the early Chester White swine. The Chester White, from its adaptability as a farmer's hog and from its phenomenal winnings wherever shown, became and was acknowledged by writers as the most popu- lar breed in America during the 60 's and 70 's. This popularity stimulated a most profitable business in breeding; so much so that the breeders who kept their herds pure could not readily supply the demand, and dealers, who saw an opportunity for speculation, bought thousands of mongrel white pigs and sold them as pure- breds, and the fact that they did not breed true to color and char- acteristics so menaced the popularity of the breed that it received a back-set that required some time to overcome. Thus the best American breed of hogs that had been created on constructive lines and had made for itself a national popularity by its own merits was doomed to censure by the practices of unscrupulous dealers. The First Record. During the time between 1848, when the Chester White hog was named, and 1884, when the first record association for the breed was organized, many of the constructive breeders who were ever loyal to the promotion of the purebreds, and who continued improving the breed along constructive lines from direct ancestors until the breed again had national popularity, saw that in order to have further protection from unscrupulous dealers 182 BREED HISTORIES it would be necessary to form an association, and to this end E. R. Moody, Eminence, Ky., was instrumental in organizing the first Chester White record association for the breed in 1884. E. B. Ashbridge, Chester Co., Pa., a charter member, who bred them and had the distinction of winning more prizes over all breeds during the 60 's and 70 's than any other breeder of any breed, bought his first Chester Whites in 1848 from Bennie Hickman, Chester Co., Pa., one of the first few men to whom the creation of the breed is accredited. The animals with which he made these winnings were, like their early ancestors, very large. His herd boar Jim Burns was slaughtered when five years old and dressed over 1,000 pounds. A grandson of this hog, when three years old, was slaughtered and dressed 946 pounds. The Period; Numerous Records. The period of record associa- tions for the breed dates from 1884. Individual efforts made for personal prominence by the handling of animals of the breed brought about quite a number of record associations with different claims for distinction. With the writer's years of breeding and studying the affairs of the breed, he has noticed that the result of the claim made for distinction has not only confused the advocates of the breed but has confused the public as well. From 1884 up to 1913 unity of action for the welfare of the breed was menaced by the activities of seven *record associations catering to the business affairs of the Chester White breed. To the constructive breeders and loyal supporters of the breed is accredited the maintenance of the merits of the breed from its creation up to 1907, when the first unity of action was manifested in promoting the breed by placing the Standard Chester White Record on such a financiaj basis as would support universal breed promotion. A growing sentiment to ''boost" the breed as it should be was made possible by launching of the " White Breeders' Companion" in 1910, which is now known as "The Chester White Journal" Merging Associations. With the improved methods and pur- pose of the Standard record and the help of the "Companion" in showing the advantages of greater unity in co-operation, the Ameri- can Chester White Record consolidated with the Standard Chester White Record in 1913, thereby creating the Chester White Swine Record Association, which the National 0. I. C. Chester White Record Association joined in March, 1915. To the progressive breeders is ascribed the progress of the breed. They have brought about great improvement in individuality, and uniformity in type and size. They have bred a heavier coat of hair, which enables the breed to stand the climate in all countries much better than the original Chester White. The feet and legs are straighter, with bigger bone ; backs are broader and stronger ; the sides are deeper and the head and face are neater. All of these improvements have been made, yet the merits of the breed and its prolificacy have been maintained. *Note: An analysis of the record associations and the claims made for distinction can be obtained by writing to the .Chester White Swine Record Association, Rochester, Indiana. THE CHESTER WHITE 183 A Heavy Breed. The Chester "White is classed as a large breed of the lard type. Specimens of the ancestors of the breed dressed over 1,000 pounds. In fact, specimens in any period of the breed's history have dressed 1,000 pounds. While the breed has the capacity for making large hogs, a table of the average weights of the ani- mals shown at the National Swine Show, Omaha, Nebraska, in October, 1917, may be of interest : 15 aged boars averaged 744 Ibs. heaviest one 915 Ibs. 7 senior year boars averaged 572 Ibs. heaviest one 710 Ibs. 15 junior year boars averaged 583 Ibs. heaviest one 720 Ibs. 26 senior year boars averaged 404 Ibs. heaviest one 460 Ibs. 20 aged sows averaged 586 Ibs. heaviest one 690 Ibs. 9 senior year sows averaged 551 Ibs. heaviest one 630 Ibs. 18 junior year sows averaged 501 Ibs. heaviest one 530 Ibs. 23 senior sow pigs averaged 401 Ibs. heaviest one 415 Ibs. A well-known swine writer in his report of this breed at the National Swine Show says : " As to uniformity of size for age the Chester White breed is unexcelled." With this reputation and with the winnings that this type of Chester White has made in the bar- row shows and carcass contests, it is the opinion of the writer that it might be a mistake to standardize an average weight very much higher than is shown above. The Chester White is easily acclimated and contented under different conditions ; is a good grasser a clean dresser and a profitable cutter ; is prolific and raises a large percent of a big litter, and can be fitted for the packer's market at any age. The finished product, or the carcass of the Chester White and its crosses, has an unparalleled record of winnings at the Inter- national Live Stock Exposition in Chicago. The standard of type for the breed, as formerly used, was revised by representative mem- bers of the Chester White Swine Record Association and the 0. 1. C. Swine Breeders' Association in 1913, and it is the official score card for the breed and is so recognized by the American Association of Expert Judges of Swine. The Record Associations for the breed universally recognized are the Chester White Swine Record Association, Rochester, Indiana, the 0. I. C. Swine Breeders' Association, Goshen, Indiana, and the National Chester White Record, West Chester, Pennsyl- vania. CHAPTER IV THE POLAND CHINA By WM. M. MCFADDEN Secretary of the American Poland-China Record Association In the early part of the nineteenth century, prior to the devel- opment of the great Middle West, where grain production and ani- mal husbandry now largely obtain, the necessity was keenly felt for a meat-producing animal which could not only condense the rich grain, chiefly corn, and carry it to market, but consume large A Grand Champion Poland China Boar quantities in short order, and be got to market as speedily as pos- sible, once the grain was ready to feed. In the absence of pure- bred hogs or records, a body of farmers and feeders in southwestern Ohio set about designing a type of hog suited to American require- ments, selecting, modeling, developing and perfecting various sorts obtainable. They continued this cause until 1877, when a record was established, and the Poland- China became the acknowledged "cornbelt type," the great Middle West being known as the corn and hog belt, later styled the corn, hog and clover belt. These Ohio farmers sought a type of hog that could make the best use of corn, because corn was abundant, and the most bulky crop to market as raw product. 184 THE POLAND CHINA 185 Developed and perfected, therefore, under American environ- ment, by undoubtedly the most competent and skilful men who ever engaged in a like enterprise, whose ideas were both original and constructive, and whose primary object was superior feeding and fattening ability, coupled with vigor, size and rapidity of growth, the essentials, the prime requisites of economical produc- tion and packing quality, were pre-eminently established, and grounded in the breed in its inception, regardless of minor consider- ations of color, markings and points of finish or fancy. To the fact that the two prime factors disposition easily to fatten at any age, and to make rapid and immense growth were staunchly maintained against those divisions having to do with the outward appearance or beauty, is due, beyond question, the present superiority of the breed, and this fact is also accountable for its universal popularity. The geographical origin of the Poland- China was the Miami Valley, Butler Co., 0., and the origin of the breed dates back to early in the nineteenth century. Previously to 1816 two breeds of hogs were generally known in this valley: the Russian or Russia and the Byfield. These were generally bred, and their blooji mingled with common hogs of the community. In 1816 a boar and three sows, known as the Big China, were brought into the valley by the Shakers' society, whose members had much to do with the development of the Poland-China breed. Used on the Russian and Byfield crosses, the Big China produced superior feeders, and much improved the character of the Miami Valley hogs, resulting in what became widely known as the Warren County hog. Between 1816 and 1835 the swine industry of southwestern Ohio had a great impetus, due to the beneficial effects of this cross. In 1839 a hog called the Irish Grazier was brought into the county, and was one of the main factors in the perfecting of the Warren County hog. The Warren County hog had the distinction of being hardy, vigorous, prolific, and much larger than hogs of any of the other common breeds. After 1839 no outside blood was brought into the county, according to the claim made of men in a position to know the facts. Breeders of swine in this valley became "thoroughly assured that they had the elements, the basis of a good breed of hogs, and that by judicious, discriminating breeding they could produce and establish a breed that would meet the demands of the country." At the National Swine Breeders' Convention in Indianapolis, Ind.,'in November, 1872, a committee, authorized to investigate the origin of the breed, made a report, recommending the name "Poland-China,"' which was adopted. The report con- tinues : "This breed has been thoroughly established. For more than thirty-five years it has been continuously improving without the 186 BREED HISTORIES introduction of any new blood. It possesses unquestioned good qualities, and can be relied upon for the production of a progeny of like good points and qualities. The prominent characteristics of the Poland-China are as follows: 1 'Hogs of good length, with short legs, broad, straight backs, great depth of body, flanking well down, very broad, full, square hams and shoulders, drooping ears ; short heads, wide between eyes ; of spotted or dark color. They are hardy, vigorous and prolific, and when fat are perfect models, pre-eminently combining the excellencies of both the larger and smaller breeds." All of what could properly be said about the breed in 1872 can still be said, and much more. The addition of some degree of size has been one of the most popular improvements among farmers. Added bone, substance, and the holding of all the desirable ele- ments of prolificacy and broodiness are some of the things that have served to keep the breed as the best model for successful pork production. The claim that the Poland-China is the only strictly American breed was questioned by a number of persons interested in other breeds. But close study and careful thought in regard to the mat- ter has resulted in a general acceptance of the correctness of the statement. The consideration of this matter has served to bring out some striking facts, quite favorable to the breed, which had not previously had the attention which their importance deserved. The Poland-China was distinctly the result of the constructive breeding ideas of cornbelt farmers. Breeds of all colors and many different forms and characteristics were used in connection with the common hogs of the cornbelt country to produce the Poland- China. In no predominating degree did the breed owe its form, conformation and easy feeding qualities to importations, nor to any one of the numerous breeds and kinds of hogs used in making the Poland-China. The breed was not fashioned after any hog ever seen in the world before. It had new qualities, new possibilities, a new form, and was not only a new hog, but pre-eminently the result of the environments of the American cornbelt. In short, the breed was distinctly entitled to that slogan which now bids fair to become so popular, "Made in America." Many significant things have happened during the last few years to emphasize the growth of the Poland-China business in new territory, and the popularity of the breed. Only a few years ago the territory east of the Mississippi, and south of the Ohio, was smothered under a bacon type blanket. All this has completely changed, and the number of purebred Poland-Chinas in this sec- tion is many times what it was a dozen years ago, and the breed has assumed a commanding position, where formerly it made an indifferent showing. Remarkable progress has been made in the THE POLAND CHINA 187 Pacific Coast country in the breeding of Poland- Chinas, and all of the great northwest portion of the United States. Poland-China breeders in this section are' aggressive, and imbued with unbounded faith in the breed. The wide dissemination of the breed in the great northwest country of Canada, extending from Manitoba to the Pacific Coast, has marked the most notable epoch in the way of breed extension, which the Poland-China has ever seen, outside the so-called cornbelt. The increase in popularity of the breed has doubtless been greatly assisted by the large number of cornbelt farmers who have settled in that territory. It is noticeable, however, that the quick growth and easy-feeding qualities of the breed have commanded favorable attention from a great many people in this section who were for- merly bacon hog advocates. The number of Poland-Chinas being recorded at present is greater than ever before. The introduction of the breed into new territory is making astonishing progress. In addition to this, there is unmistakable evidence that the cornbelt farmer, after having tried some experiment in breed or type, or having noted the results of such experiments, has it more firmly fixed in his mind than at any former time that no breed of hogs has in its makeup so many of the essential elements of profitable pork production as the Poland-China. The first breed fashioned and developed in America, as a strictly American breed, to meet cornbelt conditions, the Poland-China is today better prepared than any other breed to serve as a pork- making machine. Unexcelled for prolificacy, unequaled for size with quality, and size for age, unapproached for adaptability to average farm conditions, the popularity of the Poland-China is for these reasons on a foundation of such real stability and tested merit that the recent remarkable increase in business is easily accounted for. No breed of hogs offers a more inviting field in which to obtain sure and satisfactory results in return for intelligent and pains- taking efforts. " CHAPTER V THE SPOTTED POLAND CHINA The Spotted Poland-China breed claims its origin is identical with all other Poland- Chinas. They originated from an amalga- mation of from five to seven mongrel breeds, beginning about 1830. The first record association of the Poland-China breed, the old Central, bears out this statement, as its first volume contains photo- graphs and descriptions in about 1877 of black hogs, spotted hogs, THE SPOTTED POLAND CHINA 189 and white hogs from the same litter. Many Poland-Chinas at that time were white, spotted and black. We maintain that through color prejudices the white hogs and spotted ones were discriminated against to such an extent that they were almost extinct by 1910; but a few breeders held out for spotted 'hogs, and in 1914 an association was formed in Indianapolis for a record from that time on for the spotted ones, and they were to be known as the Spoted Poland-China. Many of the hogs included in the National Spotted Poland- China Record Association are eligible in the black Poland-China records also, while others were picked up in 1914 and recorded as foundation animals. 'We do not claim a perfect animal in type or color at this time, but we do claim to be making an honest effort to improve our hogs, and to breed them as near a given standard, both as to individuals and as to color, as possible. We are trying to develop a hog of good length, a nice spring of ribs, a smooth coat, and marked about 40 per cent white and nicely spotted, and we want just as large a 188 THE SPOTTED POLAND CHINA 189 hog as possible to maintain its feeding qualities. We are enjoying a splendid demand in every section of the United States for the Spotted Poland-Chinas. We have now recorded about 7,000 head, have 954 members, and I think practically every state in the union is represented. We had classes in at least fourteen state fairs in 1918. We are strongly inclined to believe that there is no better breed than ours, but the kind of hog to breed is ths kind one likes best. Success with every breed depends on the efforts of the man raising the hogs. CHAPTER VI HAMPSHIRES The Hampshire hog of today is a combination type being adapted for both bacon and lard. The breed is of English origin and according to Mr. H. F. Work, at one time secretary of the breed record association, the Hampshire traces to pigs brought to Massa- chusetts from Hampshire,' England, about 1820. Descendants of this importation were taken to Kentucky about 1825, and for a A Typical Hampshire number of years were kept pure and became popular with hog breeders in Kentucky, Illinois, Ohio, and Indiana, but eventually became so mixed with other breeds that it was hard to find a pure bred Hampshire. In the early 70 's, there were several herds along the Ohio River, known as Thin-Rinds, which continued to exist until the American Hampshire Swine Record Association was established in Boone County, Kentucky, in 1893. This association by active work began to improve and popularize the breed, and in 1904, the name * ' Hamp- shire" was officially adopted for the breed. The Hampshire hog has made good records in the dressed car- cass contests and the barrow shows at the International Live Stock Expositions and other national shows. It is held in high esteem by 190 HAMPSHIRES 191 the packers, and its flesh carries a high percentage of lean, and is generally fine grained. The breed gives good satisfaction in early maturity and feeding qualities and is a good grazer. It is active, hardy, and adaptable to almost any climate. During the past few years, there has no breed made greater progress than has the Hampshire in development of individuality and in the distribution of the breed, as they are now found in large numbers in most of the states as well as becoming popular in Canada. According to the standard of excellence adopted by the Amer- ican Hampshire Swine Record Association, the ideal Hampshire has a head of a medium length, rather narrow, cheeks not full, face nearly straight, and medium width between the eyes. The eyes are bright and lively, and free from wrinkles or fat surroundings. The ear is medium, although thin, and slightly inclined outward and for- ward. The neck is short and well set to the shoulders ; the back is straight or slightly arched, medium breadth with nearly uniform thickness from shoulder to ham, and full at the loin. The sides are full, smooth and firm. The hams are of medium width and long and deep. The legs are medium length, set well apart, and squarely under the body. The coat is fine, straight, and smooth. The animal is black with the exception of a white belt encircling the body, including the fore legs. The disposition of the Hampshire is docile, quiet, and easily handled. CHAPTER VII YORKSHIRES The Yorkshire, as its name might signify, was originated in England and is descended from large, coarse boned, leggy white hogs which were common in Yorkshire and other nearby counties for many years. The exact origin of the breed is unknown.' Three distinct types of Yorkshires are bred : the Large, Middle, and Small Yorkshire. The Yorkshire is strictly a bacon type hog, A Typical Yorkshire Sow, "Bacon Type" and is used with splendid success in crossing on smaller types. The first authentic report of an importation of Yorkshires to the United States was in 1892. The headquarters for the breed is in Minnesota with representative herds in many sections of the United States. In Canada the breed has progressed much farther than in this country, and is one of the most popular and most numerous breeds found there today. The Yorkshire is pure white in color. Black hairs disqualify, but black or blue spots on the skin do not, although it is the aim of the breeder to reduce these skin spots as far as possible. A large proportion of lean to fat, and great length of side makes the York- shire particularly desirable as a bacon producing animal. To pro- duce a very fat carcass at an early age, the Large Yorkshire is not the ideal type. It is a special-purpose breed, and that purpose is to produce bacon, and as a bacon producing animal it is held in very high regard. 192 CHAPTER VIII THE TAMWORTH The Tamworth is one of the oldest breeds of improved swine, there being no out-crossing for more than 100 years. About or prior to 1812 Sir Robert Peel, then secretary 'for the English Crown to Ireland, brought from Ireland to his own estate in England, at a place called Tamworth, a breed of swine, probably descendants of the Irish Grazier. Sir Robert was much interested in improvement A "Bacon Type" Tamworth Sow of domestic animals, and "Kept this breed of swine pure and without an outcross to the time of his death in 1850, and the breed became known from that time on as Tamworth. In the first volume of the National Pig Breeders' Association herd book of Great Britain, published in 1885, we find four Tarn- worths recorded, two sows and two boars, Ruby 272, bred by Lord Hastings, East Dereham, Norfolk; Sanda, 274, bred by Mrs. Jos. Norman, Tamworth, England ; Ruf us, 261, bred by Lord Hast- ings ; Sampson, 263, bred by Thos. Watson, Coleshill, England. In Vol. XI of the English herd book, 1895, is found the first published standard of excellence. It is practically the same as is in use today. The Tamworth was practically red in color, with occasionally some black spots, these spots, however, denoting no impurity of blood. It is objectionable merely as a fancy point, and today very few black spots are seen. 193 194 BREED HISTORIES The second volume of the Canadian Swine Breeders' Record, published in 1893, has the first recording of Tamworths in America, imported in 1889 by John Bell L'Amoroux, Ont, Canada. The breed became very popular throughout Canada, and the writer at one time while visiting the Toronto Exposition, the great Canadian fair, saw more Tamworths on exhibition than any other one breed of swine. How long previously to this if any there were Tamworths in Canada the writer has been unable to ascertain. We find in 1881 Thos. Bennett, Rossville, 111., imported from England some purebred Tamworths. Since this introduction into the United States the Tamworth has been slowly making gains. The appearance of the animal has been against it, and much unjust criticism, both through intent and ignorance, has been cast upon the breed. Chief Characteristics. For decades before the introduction of bacon hogs the American people had become fixed admirers of the lard types with their rather short, thick, plump, smooth bodies and short heads, necks and limbs. The Tamworth conformation inclined to the opposite type. The wide divergence from appearance stand- point has undoubtedly militated against them, even in the face of logical reasoning from an economic standpoint. The Tamworths, contrary to the opinion of some, are docile, tractable animals, responding, as all animals do, to the character of the, treatment accorded them. The Tamworth is possessed in an unexcelled degree of the qualities of good motherhood, including ease of conception, large litters, abundant milk supply and attentiveness to young. It is particularly well adapted for the purposes of cross-breeding in the production of intermediate types. The Tamworth is pre-eminently a bacon hog. The dressed car- cass may be cut up on the local dealer's block, and retailed with little labor and expense in converting the by-products into market- able goods. The Tamworth products a maximum amount of bacon from its long, lean, deep sides, which are not unduly covered with fat. The hams and shoulders, being devoid of an excess of fat, meet with favor on the market. From the standpoint of economic production there is no reliable data on record to prove that it costs more to produce a given weight with the bacon than the lard type of hogs. A number of compara- tive tests have been made by several institutions, and the results go to show that the Tamworth is capable of holding its own. Standing of the Breed. The following data were collected by Geo. M. Rommel of the United States Bureau of Animal Industry, and published in Bulletin No. 47 of the Department of Agriculture. Experiments were made with six breeds, at eight different experi- ment stations, with reference to the number of pounds of feed con- sumed to make 100 pounds of gain. It appears that the Tamworth is capable of holding its own with the best of the breeds. \ THE TAMWORTH 195 Breed No. of Tests Total No. of Pigs Feed for 100 Ibs. Grain Tamworth Chester White 16 13 92 71 344 Ibs. 347 Poland-China Berkshire Large Yorkshire Duroc-Jersey 22 28 11 11 96 121 67 66 357 369 407 418 As a range hog none can surpass the Tamworth; in fact, it has not been found wanting in any place, north, south, east or west. Tamworth sows are great mothers, producing as a rule large litters and raising them. The percentage of loss very small. To show the tendency to prolificacy the following will illustrate: One sow in eighteen months farrowed 57 pigs, and raises 50 of them; another in a twelve-month farrowed 42 and raised 40 of them. The Tamworth will weigh well at any age, but to get full growth and weight, which occasionally reaches over 1,000 pounds in sows and 1,200 to 1,300 pounds in males, the time required to reach maturity may be a little longer than with some of the other breeds ; but how long it would take the others to reach these weights we do not attempt to say. It is reported from an authority that a Tam- worth was killed in England some years ago that weighed alive 1,607 and dressed 1,330 pounds. This without doubt establishes the heavy-weight record for swine. Amber King 1705, sold by W. Warren Morton of Kentucky to the John Robinson Circus, weighed 1,400 pounds, and was shown as "the largest hog in the world." Record Association. The American Tamworth Swine Record Association was organized in 1897. It is the only record associa- tion of the breed in the United States, and the only exclusively Tamworth record association in the world. No apology is due either the bacon hog for his looks or the owner for his choice. The most typical of all bacon hogs, the Tamworth is as much a distinct type of hog as the horse is of the equine family. Purebred bacon hogs should never be confounded with the lean, unthrifty and half- finished, half -starved type of hog of all breeds or no breed at all, brought to market and offered as bacon hogs. Neither should the breadth of his ears, the length of snout or of leg be made a matter of comparison with freaks of other breeds. The undisputed merit of the Tamworth, together with the kindly spirit of his breeder, is rapidly extending his acquaintanceship, and he is here to conquer conditions as he finds them. "We find in all lines of endeavor that there are some who are aggressive, and push their business. It is so in the breeding of purebred stock, and too many engaged in the business leave all the push and publicity to the few, and they sit quietly by and indirectly get the benefit at the expense of the hustler. Let each breeder stand up for the advantages of his par- ticular breed, and the value of the PUREBRED over the scrub. All our improvement in the industry has come through the pure- bred, the pedigreed animal. Purebreds make most economical gains, 196 BREED HISTORIES mature at an early age, are more uniform in shape, color, and quality, hence are worth more for market purposes than scrubs. Purebred sires are a necessity. It is true that there are pedigree scrubs, but these are to be dis- carded. No breeder who wishes to build up a permanent business and a good reputation should breed from inferior animals, or sell their produce for breeding purposes. The price asked for pure- bred animals should be sufficient to guarantee to the purchaser that he will get valuable animals, typical of the breed. Too many purchasers want to buy cheap. Don't cater to that kind of trade. In the swine industry let there be a higher standard of excel- lence for pedigree stock, a more general appreciation of its value among breeders, and then a means of impressing this value on in- tending purchasers. We must have confidence in our business, else we cannot inspire others with confidence. More and more is con- fidence in breeders becoming apparent, and those who have or will achieve success must be honest and have the confidence of the public. A sale made by mail should be as satisfactory as by personal inspec- tion of the herd by the would-be purchaser. That inspires confi- dence in the business. Breed for a purpose, have an ideal and strive to attain it. The breeder who aims at nothing in particular usually hits the mark. Nowhere is the goal of him who follows anywhere. Breed and feed improve live stock for profit. Breed improved live 'stock for the pleasure there is in it. Breed improved live stock to hand a legacy to posterity, something of value that will show that you have been a benefactor to your community while engaged in a liveli- hood, and perhaps carved for yourself a name that will be carried into history. The true breeder does not lose sight of the fact that any improvement made in breeding has been done to improve the animal rather than to wander to speculative values. While im- provement goes on, the ideal must be kept in mind, no matter what the commercial value of the animal. Those who have stood "pat," those who looked into the future and guessed it would be good, have not been disappointed; they are reaping their reward. CHAPTER IX THE MULEFOOT By JOHN H. DUNLAP, President, American Mule foot Hog Breeders' Association Aristotle, who was born in 384 B. C., wrote of a race of hogs with undivided toes or consolidated hoofs. Later Linaeus, the Swedish naturalist, born in 1707, wrote that hogs with undivided toes were not uncommon about his native town in Sweden. This hog has been known to naturalists in different parts of the world for more than 2,000 years. With all of this line of ancestry, the Mule- foot is a stranger to the great rank and file of hog breeders today. Just as the hut builders of South Africa used the blue mud from the diamond vein to daub his house, overlooking the immense wealth carried in each hod, so have the hog breeders overlooked the great value of the Mulefoot. It is a real diamond which was neglected in the rough, but brought to perfection has surpassed the fondest hopes of the most enthusiastic. The bottom of the foot of these hogs is soft and padlike, similar to the pads on animals of the cat family. This would indicate that they must have been a flesh-eating animal at one time, and nature provided them with pads to enable them to prey on other animals. They seem to be the same as other hogs except for their feet, yet I find their intestines are smaller. This gives them a larger dress- ing percentage. This breed gets its name from its solid foot, which is solid like that of a horse or mule. The flesh is of a remarkably fine flavor. There are a great many ideas held about its origin, but this as well as the tendency of the purebred Mulefoot to assert itself with a solid foot when crossed with other breeds, is still puzzling the scientists. My attention was called to this breed by a letter from Mr. Quinn of the United States Department of Agriculture. It seems that the Government has never been able to find out where or how this breed got its solid foot. Claims are made by many who purchased Mulefoot of me that compared with other breeds they are hardier, have greater vitality, mature earlier, and cost less to make the first 250 pounds. The sows are gentle, kind mothers, are usually very prolific, raising large litters, which if turned out will hustle for their living, or grow and thrive, paying big returns under good care and attention. They claim the pigs are hardier and freer from pig diseases than pigs of other breeds, and are great rovers, hustling for themselves from time of birth. The sows are better sucklers than those of any other breed I have ever had under ob- servation. They seem to have a gre^at capacity to produce milk while suckling pigs and the sows are harder to keep in high flesh, but as soon as their litters ase weaned the gain in flesh is very 197 198 BREED HISTORIES rapid. As a breeder of Mulefoot, I am now taking pains to cross the different families, and to have a hog equal to any breed. While the Mulefoots have been inbred to a certain extent, they attain to weights equal to those of Poland- Chinas or Duroc Jerseys, and can easily attain to individual weights of 600 to 800 pounds. The color of the Mulefoots is usually black, sometimes black with white spots. CHAPTER X OTHER BREEDS OF HOGS In addition to the standard breeds of hogs which are most numerous in the United States, there are other minor breeds, a number of which have only local distribution. Others have in the past been more or less popular but have lost popular favor because of deterioration in the breed or some other reason. These minor breeds are : Essex, Victorias, Cheshires, Suffolk, Large Black Pig, and Middle White. None of these breeds are raised to any extent in the United States. The Essex originated in Essex County, England, and belongs to the small breeds, being much smaller than the present day pop- ular breeds. It is all black in color, smooth and compact of body. The Improved Essex was imported into the United States in large numbers at one time, but practically no Essex have been brought into this country during later years. The Essex is quick maturing and easy fleshing, but its lack of size prevents it from becoming popular with the farmer. The Victoria is a medium sized hog, with a rather short snout, dished face, erect ear, and white in color. The breed was originated about 1870 by Geo. F. Davis, Dyer, Ind., and was formed by com- bining the blood of the Berkshire, Chester White, Suffolk, and Poland-China. Although a breed known as the Victoria was orig- inated in 1850 by Col. F. D. Curtis of New York, the breed is not generally recognized as a distinct breed and is not widely known. The Cheshire breed was originated in Jefferson County, N. Y., about 1855. Some believe that Cheshire is simpty a derivative of the Yorkshires, as Yorkshires were brought into Jefferson County and crossed with white pigs of that neighborhood. It is also be- lieved that Suffolk blood was used in breeding up the Cheshire. The Cheshire is a white medium sized breed with slightly dished face, small erect ear, fine bone, with well developed shoulders and hams. The breed has made very slow progress and is practically unknown outside of the United States. The Suffolk is a small breed, with dished face, small and very short snout, erect ears, and a thick short body, set up on very short fine boned legs. The hair is of a pale yellowish white color. This breed is of the same origin as the small Yorkshire. There is no such breed as the White Suffolk recognized in England, but the name is sometimes applied locally to the Small Black breed, of which the Essex is a representative. The breed has practically disappeared in Canada and is found only in small numbers in the Mississippi Valley in the United States. The Large Black Pig, as its name would signify, is solid black and of large proportions, one of the characteristics being a very 199 200 OTHER BREEDS OF HOGS large drooping ear. It is somewhat on the order of the bacon type. The origin of the breed is not known, although it has been bred for many years in England. This breed is hardly known outside of England and is bred only locally there. The Middle White is in reality a cross between the Large White and the Small White, although it is recognized in England as a distinct breed. Some of the breed might pass as the Large White and others, the Small. The Middle White is practically un- known in this country, although a few have been imported into America during the past few years. CHAPTER XI FARMERS MEAT SHOWS During the last few years exhibits of country-cured meat have become quite common throughout the United States, especially in the Central and Southern portions where the curing of hams after the old-time recipes has reached the highest degree of perfection. Of all the states in the Union, Missouri was the first to put on a Farmers' Ham and Bacon Show under state auspices. In January, 1913, at which time we were serving as assistant secretary of the Missouri State Board of Agriculture, we, with the approval of that body, inaugurated the pioneer farmers' meat show. Two factors prompted us to put on such a show. We wanted to get the consumer acquainted with the outstanding merits of country- cured meat, and we desired also to interest more farmers in the making of meat that would be a distinct credit to the country. So the show was both an exhibit and a school. Our idea was, and still is, that the farmer is of all men the best fitted to instruct and interest others in meat making or, to put it in Missouri parlance, to "show 'em." The first exhibit, held in the Missouri College of Agriculture buildings, brought out a few very excellent pieces of country- cured meat, especially hams, but in the main the exhibits were sadly lacking in attractiveness and uniformity. Generally speak- ing, the quality was good, and the men who knew of the merits of country ham eagerly bought all that were for sale at the con- clusion of the show. At the same time the city consumer, accus- tomed to the attractively put up packing house product, was wont to turn up his nose at the country-cured ham that is unless his nose caught the appetizing aroma of said ham. In this event it was different. To taste this ham was ever after to want one. At this first show some effort was made to establish a sort of score card or standard of excellence for hams. A tentative score card for the judging of hams was suggested as follows; Size and form weight (10 to 18 pounds) 5; trim, 10; symmetry, 5; total, 20. Cure and quality flavor, 50 ; color, 10 ; texture, 10 ; proportion of fat to lean, 5 ; marbling, 5 ; total, 80 ; grand total, 100. Not only was the second Missouri farmers' ham and bacon show larger than the first, but the quality and uniformity of the meat was superior. The improvement of trim and general appear- ance of hams was especially noticeable where the exhibitors had made entries in the first show. The third annual exhibit repre- sented a long step forward. Clearly, both the management and the exhibitors were learning a noteworthy change in the better display of meat in the showroom. This included more and clearer classifications, with rack and shelving arrangements calculated to 201 202 FARMERS MEAT SHOWS bring out more prominently the educational side of the show. For instance, after the hams had been cut for the inspection of the judges; they were not piled in a heap but by the use of proper racks, provided with shelving, the parts of the ham were kept together so that the entire piece of meat might be seen at a glance. This arrangement made it easy for the public to compare the outside appearance of the ham with the appearance after it had been cut. In the third annual Missouri show the prize list was as follows : Best home-cured country ham, $25 ; second, $15 ; third, $10. Home- cured country bacon first, $25; second, $15; third, $10. Home- cured country shoulders first, $12.50 ; second, $7.50. Fresh coun- try sausage, first $10, and second, $5.00. Smoked or fancy country sausage, first, $10, and second, $5.00. In later shows separate classifications were provided for cured sausage and for fancy saus- age. This is advisable. Green hams are not exhibited. Hams must have been made eight months or more. This rule should not apply to shoulders or bacon. Here only sufficient cure to preserve is all that is required. In conducting a farmers' meat show it is important that the announcement concerning it be made in ample time and that this announcement be couched in the plainest and most simple language. The premium list and terms governing the exhibit should be clearly defined. All meat should be received at the show room in time to be entered and placed for exhibit before the opening of the show. When received, each piece should be weighed and tagged with a number corresponding to the entry number in the superintendent's book. All entries should be confined strictly to farm-made meat. In the Missouri show the rule has been to return all meat at ex- hibitor 's expense at the close of the contest or to sell meat at market price and remit this. In conducting a meat show, one difficulty is to secure competent judges, men who know good country-cured meat and who know how to make it. If there are up-to-date farmers who have given considerable thought to this question and who have established reputations for the quality of their smoke-house products, they will perhaps be the best judges. Many good judges of fresh meat lack the qualifications for judging the country-cured product. It is important that the showroom be neat and clean as this will make the exhibits appear to better advantage. Winners of prizes should be required to furnish, if possible, the recipes by which meat was cured. Other information, such as breed of hog, age and weight, from which meat came is desirable. If at first there was doubt as to the value or practibility of a farmers' ham and bacon show, these misgivings have been removed. At such shows, in Missouri and in many other states which have fallen in line, there is now seen the real country ham, brown as a berry, sweet and savory, and with white fat and red lean, making altogether a most appetizing product. The bacon, too, is of the best, " crisp, juicy savory," with the much sought "streak o' fat and streak o' lean" splendidly sandwiched. Such an exhibit ban- FARMERS MEAT SHOWS 203 ishes forever from the city man's mind the idea that a country ham is a long-shanked piece of meat apparently trimmed with an axe, the superabundance of fat being yellow, and the smell, as it comes from a dirty sack, a vivid reminder of rancid lard. Nor will this connoisseur from the city longer think of country bacon as a piece of very salty "pale complexioned side meat". The only dissatisfaction that will exist in the mind of the would-be con- sumer will result from his inability to satisfy his ap.petite. Farmers ' meat shows should not be limited to State and Federal support. Swine breeders' associations everywhere should back up the movement. Agricultural associations and farm clubs generally may well take the lead. The war has taught many that they can temporarily do with less meat. Hence, it is doubly important that, now that peace has again come, that the truth that nothing can, after all, permanently take the place of meat, be impressed on the purchasing public. Most of all, the farmer needs to know that he can make better meat for his own use than he can buy, and at the same time the cost is less. The after-the-war period should bring about the revival of the countcy smoke-house. If it is worth while for the lemon growers and the raisin growers of California to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in exploiting their goods it is no less important that the swine growers of America advertise their products. CHAPTER XII THE NATIONAL SWINE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION BY MEBRITT S. MCFADDEN The devastating and long to be remembered foot-and-mouth scourge which secured a footing in America in 1914 was the in- direct cause of the formation of the National Swine Growers' Asso- ciation. It has long been the custom for breeders of purebred swine to look forward to their annual meetings during the International Live Stock Exposition in Chicago, the first week in December. The prevalence of the foot-and-mouth disease in 1914 made it necessary to abandon the International that year, thus removing the attrac- tion that had made possible representative gatherings of the de- votees of the several breeds. It was to counteract this loss and to offer an attraction that would bring forth representative gather- ings that the Illinois Swine Breeders' Association in 1914 sent forth an invitation to the swine breeders of America to attend a meeting of their organization in Chicago on Dec. 2, 1914, the prime object being the formation of a National association of swine growers. At the time this step was taken J. Young Caldwell, William's- ville, 111., was president of the Illinois Swine Breeders' Association, and Charles A. Marker, of Auburn, L. E. Frost, then of Spring- field, W. M. McFadden of Chicago, E. J. Evans of Chicago, L. E. Troeger of Chicago, E. C. Stone of Peoria, W. S. Corsa of White- hall, W. J. Carmichael of the University of Illinois and others took an active and prominent part in crystallizing the idea of a National Swine Growers' Association. Accordingly on the date set more than one hundred representa- tive swine breeders of all breeds and from all sections of the country sat at dinner at the Fort Dearborn Hotel in Chicago. Opinions and suggestions were offered by nearly all of the leaders of the swine business of that day who were in attendance. The unanimity of opinion and the broadness of the spirit of those present re- sulted in the organization of the present National Swine Growers' Association. Wm. M. McFadden presided as chairman of that meeting. A. C. Halliwell, at that time editor of "The Chicago Daily Live Stock World," was elected president, J. L. Thatcher, Davenport, la., vice-president, L. E. Troeger of Chicago, secretary, and Geo. M. Cantrall, also of Chicago, treasurer. All of these officers were elected by acclamation. The executive committee selected at this meeting constituted a representative from each of the various breeds, and the personnel was as follows: For Hampshires, E. C. Stone, Peoria, 111. ; for Berkshires, W. S. Corsa, Whitehall, 111. ; for Duroc-Jerseys, J. Young Caldwell, Williams- ville, 111. ; for Poland-Chinas, J. E. Meharry, Tolono, 111. ; for Tam- 204 THE NATIONAL SWINE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION 205 worths, Frank Thornber, Carthage, 111.; for Large Yorkshires, Thomas H. Canfield, Lake Park, Minn. ; for Mulefoots, John H. Dunlap, Williamsport, 0.; for Chester Whites, Fred H. Moore, Rochester, Ind. The activities of the first year were directed by men who gave liberally of their own time to the service of the association, and no mean amount of progress was made in placing the association on a plane that commended it to the attention of the nation's live stock husbandmen. Plans for a National Swine Show, suggested and commended upon at various times during the year, failed to result in the establishment of such a show, owing to the prevalence of the foot-and-mouth disease. The interest in the association, however, continued, and when the annual dinner was called at the Fort Dearborn Hotel on Dec. 1, 1915, notwithstanding the fact that the International Live Stock Exposition had again been cancelled, the attendance numbered well above two hundred breeders from many parts of America, and represented all of the breeds of swine. The idea of the National Swine Show crystallized at this meeting, and definite plans were inaugurated, looking to the establishment of such a show during 1916. Secretary W. M. McFadden of the American Poland-China Record Association was elected president of the association, with J. Young Caldwell, Williamsville, 111., vice- president, James J. Doty, Shenandoah, la., secretary, and George M. Cantrall, Chicago, treasurer. The personnel of the executive committee was, for Poland-Chinas, H. L. Currie, Brownsville, Tenn. ; for Duroc-Jerseys, Charles V. Truax, Sycamore, 0. ; for Hampshires, E. C. Stone, Peoria, 111. ; for Spotted Poland-Chinas, Mrs. Jennie M. Conrad, Conrad, Ind. : for Mulefoots, John H. Dunlap, Williamsport, 0. ; for Berkshires, W. S. Corsa, Whitehall, 111. ; for Large Yorkshires, Thomas H. Canfield, White Bear Lake, Minn. ; for Chester Whites, C. R. Doty, Charleston, 111. The enthusiasm that prevailed at the meeting indicated that it was the definite intention of the swinemen to support the associa- tion, using it as the official voice of America's swine interests. The year that followed the meeting found the association active in its efforts to secure more uniform and better quarantine regulations, disease eradication methods and many other improvements in swine husbandry conditions, and to the development of a national show of purebred swine. In January, 1916, announcement was made of the selection of the site for the National Swine Show. Omaha was chosen as the location, after competition with Waterloo and Des Moines, la., Dallas, Tex., Atlanta, Ga., Memphis, Tenn., and Shreveport, La. The inducements offered by the Nebraska city were such as to offer every likelihood of a successful initial show, which proved to be the case, when the show closed on Oct. 7. Upwards of 1,400 hogs were on exhibition, and the character and excellence of the exhibits were such as to bring forth the highest praise from the country's live stock press. The judging in the various breeds was ably done, and the standards there established have become the standards for 206 "THE NATIONAL SWINE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION the breeds in all of the shows, with a resulting harmony of effort that has advanced the purebred industry and the showring to a plane that neither had ever before enjoyed. The annual meeting of the association in 1916 was held at the Fort Dearborn Hotel in Chicago on Dec. 4. Two hundred and thirty-nine sat at dinner that evening. There is no question that there had never previously been so large or representative a gather- ing of men interested in America's swine husbandry, and all were enthusiastic over the accomplishments of the association, especially over the initial National Swine Show. The discussions of the evening outlined many of the fields of endeavor for the association in broadening the swine industry. It was at this meeting that the suggestion was first publicly made for the employment of a man to devote his entire time to the interests of swinemen an idea that crystallized twelve months later. The officers in 1916 were unanimously chosen to continue their duties through 1917, thus leaving in office President W. M. Mc- Fadden, Vice-President J. Young Caldwell, Secretary James J. Doty and Treasurer George M. Cantrall. The 1917 executive com- mittee was selected as follows : For Poland-Chinas, H. Wade Gillis, Mt. Pleasant, la.; for Duroc-Jerseys, W. H. VanMeter, Williamsville, 111. ; for Berkshires, C. F. Curtiss, Ames, la. ; for Chester Whites, Fred H. Moore, Rochester, Ind. ; for Hampshires, Willie Essig, Tipton, Ind.; for Spotted Poland-Chinas, Fred L. Obenchain, Bainbridge, Ind. ; for Mulef oots, John H. Dunlap, Williamsport, 0. ; for Tamworths, J. B. Mackoy, Farrugut, la. ; for Large Yorkshires, B. F. Davidson, Menlo, la. The Association early announced that the National Swine Show for 1917 would be held in the same quarters as the event in 1916, with such additions as might be required. The dates were set as Oct. 3-10, inclusive, thus including a Sunday in the middle of the show week a move made to bring out a large attendance of town- folk on that day. The idea did not bring the desired result, how- ever, and was abandoned the following year. In July the show committee W. M. McFadden, L. E. Frost and E. C. Stone met with the various recording association secretaries, and compiled the rules that were to govern the show in 1917, and the report of that meeting was widely published. A students' judging contest was planned at this meeting, and N. M. Gordon of Chicago was made chairman of the committee in charge, his co-workers being Ray Davis and R. L. (''Bob") Hill. Subsequently this event proved to be one of the real features of the show. The stage for the second national was well set, and the number of entries exceeded those of 1916 by over a hundred head and the quality, uniformity and type of the animals presented offered elo- quent evidence of the influence of the show of the preceding year. There was far less divergence in type and a considerably greater uniformity in the pens that year, and the judging was again of the kind more firmly to set the best standards of breed development. The attendance at the show was a disappointment to the officials although the earlier days showed a sharp advance over the figures THE NATIONAL SWINE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION 207 for the previous year. Doubtless the cold weather of the closing days was largely responsible for the decrease. It was a fact worthy of note, however, that there was a larger number of breeders present from a distance, and many of the best animals were sold by exhibitors to these men. Gifford Pinchot of the United States Food Administration was a visitor at the show, and a meeting of the swinemen was held in the Exchange Building in Omaha during the week to consider with him the best means to be employed to bring about an increase in the amount of pork produced in 1918. Members of the association at- tended the meeting in large numbers, and resolutions were adopted designed to offer the proper stimulus to pork production. The de- bate on the subject was spirited, and the unity of the hogmen to aid the Government in bringing the 'desired results was marked. There is no question that that meeting largely of the National Swine Growers' Association membership, was an important cog in the machinery that was employed to assure an adequate production of pork in 1918. In the winter of 1917 the importance of the association had come to be so widely appreciated that it was no longer possible to hold the annual meeting in the quarters previously used for that pur- pose. Therefore the meeting was arranged for the Morrison Hotel in Chicago on Monday night of the International show week. The healthy condition of the organization was evidenced by the balance of $2,199 in the treasury and by the large increase in membership during the year. It was at this meeting that the subject of securing a salaried secretary for the association was brought to a head by the assurance of various pledges of financial support. The record associations and various publications evidenced a desire to be counted in on the program for supporting such an office, and the selection of a man was delegated to the executive committee. This committee was selected as follows : For Duroc-Jerseys, W. H. Van- Meter, Williamsville, 111. ; for Poland-Chinas, Chas. A. Marker, Au- burn, 111. ; for Chester Whites, Fred H. Moore, Rochester, Ind. ; for Berkshires, E. J. Barker, Thorntown, Ind.; for Hampshires, E. C. Stone, Peoria, 111. ; for Tamworths, J. B. Mackoy, Farragut, la. ; for Spotted Poland-Chinas, John Bock, Kempton, Ind. ; for Large Yorkshires, B. F. Davidson, Menlo, la. ; for Mulefoots, Robert E. Pfeiffer, Columbus, 0. W. M. McFadden was elected president of the association for the third successive term, Robt. J. Evans of Chicago, vice-president, E. Z. Russell, Omaha, Neb., secretary, and George M. Cantrall, Chicago, treasurer. Early in 1918 a meeting of the executive committee was held in Peoria, 111., at which various proposals were heard for the loca- tion of the 1918 National Swine Show, and at the same time a con- siderable amount of discussion was indulged in relative to the selection of a permanent salaried secretary for the organization. No definite decision was reached in either instance at this meeting, but subsequently announcement was made of the selection of Cedar Rapids as the site of the 1918 show, and a month later ratification 208 THE NATIONAL SWINE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION of the selection of John T. Stinson for the office of permanent secre- tary was announced. The selection of Cedar Rapids for the show came as a considerable surprise, but centering the show as it did in the heart of one of the greatest swine producing areas the announce- ment was well received, and interest in the event took an early impetus. Mr. Stinson located his office at Cedar Rapids, and at once busied himself with campaigns for the securing of memberships in the association. A great deal of missionary work was done to find the most effective methods of securing members, and the results of the efforts were considerable, though the natural reticence of farmers to organize themselves has been apparent throughout the building of the association. The secretary's office kept the members well posted on the happenings in swinedom and was particularly effective in giving authentic reports of all movements of the Food Administration looking toward a realization of the necessary in- crease in pork production. In this regard E. Z. Russell, who re- signed as secretary in favor of Mr. Stinson, gave valuable service as the special representative of the association in "Washington. Mr. Russell was in charge of the swine promotion work of the Bureau of Animal Industry of the Federal Department of Agriculture and, working with the National Swine Growers' Association, his efforts have been effective in making possible the work the association has accomplished. Unquestionably the greatest of the three swine shows was that held at Cedar Rapids Sept. 30 to Oct. 5, 1918. The new location found a community alive to the importance of swine husbandry in American agriculture, and the attendance greatly exceeded that of either of the previous events. In fact, the attendance practically equalled the combined attendance of the first and second shows. An inadequate conception of the magnitude of the show on the part of those responsible for its conduct resulted in a rather inadequate preparation for the event, with some discomfort and inconvenience to exhibitors. Neither can it truthfully be said that the judging equaled that of previous years in all breeds, though as a whole criticism in this regard was mild, and the type and standard of breed perfection was not impaired by the decisions made. Hogs of seven breeds were exhibited at this show, both the Large York- shires and Tamworths having classifications. A notable part of the show was the exposition feature promoted by Secretary Stinson, which included a corn, ham and bacon show, machinery and equip- ment, as well as other accessories of interest and entertainment that were cordially received by the visitors. At the annual meeting of the association on Dec. 2, 1918, at the Hotel Sherman in Chicago, the annual dinner was dispensed with, owing to the press of business to be transacted. Upwards of two hundred members were present, and it was obvious that the interest in the association had become so great that the. special feature of a dinner was unnecessary to attract them. Officers and members alike viewed the activities of the year 1918 as most encouraging, and the outlook for future as bright. Among the accomplishments of THE NATIONAL SWINE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION 209 the association that were viewed with particular regard was the activity of the officers in regard to the fixing of the minimum price for hogs in conjunction with the Food Administration, the lifting of embargo and express shipments of hogs during December, the successful conduct of the swine show, the progress made in securing uniform shipping regulations for the various states and other features. A talk by Geo. M. Rommel, Chief of the Bureau of Animal Industry, enlightened the members on the live stock conditions of the old world, as observed by him on a trip made with a commission sent to investigate. L. H. Stubbs of the Chamber of Commerce at Cedar Rapids also made a talk, in which he explained the reasons for the shortcomings of the swine show accommodaticns for 1918, and promised the members that Cedar Rapids had learned its lesson well and was prepared to correct all mistakes at the show of 1919. The following officers were unanimously elected : President, Robt. J. Evans, Chicago ; Vice-president, Fred H. Moore, Rochester, Ind. ; Treasurer, Geo. M. Cantrall, Chicago. Executive Committee : For Poland-Chinas, Chas. A. Marker, Auburn, 111. ; for Duroc-Jerseys, W. M. Putman, Tecumseh, Neb. ; for Chester Whites, L. C. Reese, Prescott, la. ; for Hampshires, Clayton Messenger, Keswick, la. ; for Large Yorkshires, B. F. Davidson, Menlo, la. ; for Tamworths, P. 0. Morris, Aledo, 111. ; for Berkshires, Ralph M. Jenkins, Orleans, Ind. ; for Mulef oots, John H. Dunlap, Williamsport, 0. ; for Spotted Poland-Chinas, John H. Bock, Kempton, Ind. The selection of the secretary was left to the executive committee, under whose official direction he was placed. Subsequently the committee selected W. J. Carmichael, formerly of the Animal Husbandry Department of the University of Illinois, and for several months previously to his appointment, associated with E. Z. Russell as a specialist in swine husbandry promotion by the United States Bureau of Animal Industry in Washington. Mr. Carmichael selected an office in the Old Colony Building, Chi- cago, as his headquarters, and is taking an active part in live stock activities of the country in behalf of swinemen. The Swine Growers' Association has made progress toward realiz- ing a powerful organization, working for the betterment of men engaged in the production of sw r ine. Organization is coming to be more and more recognized by farmers as a means of accomplishing things. Various associations of farmers and farmers' interests are springing up, and their effect is coming to be more and more noticeable. The National Swine Growers' Association has arrived at a place in its development that promises that it shall become one of the most powerful organizations of the country devoted to such a course. Membership in it is a mark of progress and alertness, and farmers and breeders are taking advantage of it irrespective of breeds or whether they are breeders of purebreds or growers of pork. 210 FORTY YEARS' EXPERIENCE OF A PRACTICAL HOG MAN GESTATION TABLE Showing the date when a sow is due to farrow, counting sixteen weeks from the day when she was served. Find the date when the sow was served, and the date immediately to the right is the date when she is due. For instance, if the sow was served February 1, she is due May 24 ; if served May 24, she is due September 13. Feb. May Sept. Jan. April Aug. Dec. Mar. July Nov. Feb. June Oct. Jan. 1 24 13 3 25 15 5 27 17 6 26 18 8 28 2 25 14 4 26 16 6 28 18 7 27 19 9 29 3 26 15 5 27 17 7 29 19 8 28 20 10 30 Mar. 4 27 16 6 28 18 8 30 20 9 1 21 11 31 Feb. 5 28 17 7 29 19 9 31 21 10 2 22 12 1 April 6 29 18 8 30 20 10 1 22 11 3 23 13 2 May 7 30 19 9 1 21 11 2 23 12 4 24 14 3 8 31 20 10 2 22 12 3 24 13 5 25 15 4 June 9 1 21 11 3 23 13 4 25 14 6 26 16 5 10 2 22 12 4 24 14 5 26 15 7 27 17 6 11 3 23 13 5 25 15 6 27 16 8 28 18 7 12 4 24 14 6 26 16 7 28 17 9 29 19 8 13 5 25 15 7 27 17 8 29 18 10 30 20 9 July 14 6 26 16 8 28 18 9 30 19 11 1 21 10 15 7 27 17 9 29 19 10 31 20 12 2 22 11 Aug. 16 8 28 18 10 30 20 11 21 13 3 23 12 17 9 29 19 11 31 21 12 2 22 14 4 24 13 Sept. 18 10 30 20 12 22 13 3 23 15 5 25 14 Oct. 19 11 1 21 13 2 23 14 4 24 16 6 26 15 20 12 2 22 14 3 24 15 5 25 17 7 27 16 21 13 3 23 15 4 25 16 6 26 18 8 28 17 22 14 4 24 16 5 26 17 7 27 19 9 29 18 23 15 5 25 17 6 27 18 8 28 20 10 30 19 24 16 6 26 18 7 28 19 9 29 21 11 31 20 Nov. 25 17 7 27 19 8 29 20 10 30 22 12 1 21 Dec. 26 18 *8 28 20 9 30 21 11 1 23 13 2 22 27 19 9 29 21 10 31 22 12 2 24 14 3 23 Jan. 28 20 10 30 22 11 1 23 13 3 25 15 4 24 21 11 31 23 12 2 24 14 4 26 16 5 25 INDEX Advertising. Ages, Authenticating Alfalfa, Feed Saved By Use of Alfalfa Hay Alfalfa Pasture ,. , Alfalfa, Protein in Antiscorbutic Substances Seemingly Necessary Arrival of Pig Page 80 70 123 163 121 122 Barley Beans ..., Berkshire History Blood Lines, Study Bloodmeal 108 76 145 161 173 78 158 Bluegrass 127 Breeding, Age, Time and Season for 32 Breeding Crates, Use of 32 Breeding Pigs, Ration for 116 Breeding Season 32 Brood Sow, Care of 36 Brood Sows, Selecting 29 Brood Sow, Feed of 36 Buttermilk. . . 154 Canker Sore Mouth Carbohydrate Equivalent Castrating Catalogues for Herd Cereals, Efficient Use of Charcoal or Slack Coal Cheshire Chester White History Chute for Loading Hogs Cob Charcoal, How to Make. . Concrete Dipping Tank Condiments Cooking Feed Corn, A Healthful Feed Corn, A Substitute for Corn and Alfalfa Corn and Cobmeal Corn and Other Feeds Corn Oil Cakemeal Corn or Indian-Maize Grain . . Corn, Preparation for Hogs. . . Corn, Soft ., Correspondence Cottonseed Meal Cowpeas Crops to Feed Green Cross Breeding Curing Hams, A Recipe for . . . Curing Thick White Fat Pork. Diseases, Common. . . Dressing Duroc Jersey 112 101 81 110 139 199 180 10 58 50 64 56 135 149 136 143 144 162 135 140 144 78 161 130 57 48 95 67 177 Page Emmer 151 Energy Builders 108 Essex 199 Exercise on Show Circuit. . . 67 Farmers' Meat Shows 201 Farrowing Time 34 Fishmeal .,. 157 Feeding for Market 52 Feeding on Circuit 68 Feeds and Feeding 54 Feeds, Basal 113 Feed House and Feeding Pens for Swine (Ground Plan) 15 Feeds, Composition 113 Feeds, Condimental 164 Feeds, Miscellaneous 114 Feeds, Miscellaneous 164 Feed Saved by Using Alfalfa 123 Feeds, Supplementary 153 Forage Crop Mixture 7 Forage Crops, Selecting 121 Forage Crops, Why Grow 120 Free Choice System, Beginning of. . 168 Garbage 164 Gluten Feed 161 Grains, Hard Should Be Ground. .. . 109 Grazing, Heavy 111 Advised 122 Green Feed 55 Green Rye, Effects of 129 Hair, Clipping 66 Hair, The Coat of 30 Ham and Egg Lunch Loaf 85 Ham Balls 85 Ham, Baked 84 Ham, Boiled 84 Ham, Boneless Boiled 85 Ham, Delicious Fried with Eggs .... 85 Hampshires 190 Head Cheese 84 Herd Boar, The 26 Herd Boar, Handling the 27 Hog Cholera and Serum 88 Hog Farm, Location 9 Hogging Down Corn 54 Hog House, Community Hah" Moni- tor Roof Type 22 Hog Houses, Movable; Types Built at Iowa State College 16 Hog House, Myers Plan. 12 Hog Wallow, A Convenient and Sanitary 45 Hominy Feed 149 Housecleaning 58 211 212 INDEX Continued Page Immunizing a Business Policy 93 Inbreeding . 48 Ingredients, Basic 118 Judging at Shows 72 Lard, Home Made Large Black Hog Limestone. r Line-Breeding Linseed Oilmeal Marking Marketing, Six Months Before. Meatmeal Tankage Medium Red Clover Middle White Mulefoot. .. 86 199 136 48 157 39 47 156 126 199 197 National Swine Growers' Associa- tion, The 204 Oats, Common Field Oats , Oatmeal, Hull-less Overfeeding, Ill-Effects of .... Pasture, Importance of Good . Pastures, Miscellaneous Pasture, Mixed Pastures, on Low Protein Pastures, on High Protein .... Peanuts Peanut Meal Pedigrees Pigs' Feet, Boneless Pigs' Feet Souse Pig Meal Pigs, Care of Plant Leaves Balance Rations. Pleuro-Pneumonia Poland China, The Pork, Home Cured Porkmaking Profitable Potatoes Precautions, Sanitary Protein Another Essential . . 129 159 160 52 18 128 130 132 130 152 159 78 84 84 58 44 111 97 184 83 53 151 45 106 Rack for Feeding Alfalfa 59 Rape, Analysis of 124 Rape 124 Ration, A Complete 104 Ration, How to Balance. .......... 105 Ration, Successful for Economical Dry-lot Feeding^ 132 Ration, To Balance a/ 115 Rheumatism 99 Rock Phosphate 137 Roots 164 Record Card 42 Record of Litters 39 Rye 147 Salt Salt Pork, Fried Sausage, Home Made. . 137 84 86 Page Self -Feeding, Does It Pay? 166 Self-Feeding Don'ts 172 Self-Feeders on Pasture 167 Selecting a Boar for Common Sows 51 Serum, Preparation of 90 Shade, Natural or Artificial 19 Show Herd, Feeding the 64 Show Herd, Handling in the Ring . . 65 Show Herd, Exercise Necessary .... 65 Show Herd, Fitting the 63 Show Herd, Finishing Touches 66 Show Herd, Selection and Fitting of 62 Showing, Advantages of 60 Shipment, Preparation of Pig for ... 75 Shipping Crates. 74 Sire, Importance of Good 23 Sire's Influence 24 Skimmilk 153 Skin Diseases 100 Soiling 57 Sore Feet 98 Sore Mouths 97 Sore Teats : 100 Sorghums 148 Sow, Type to Select 29 Soy Beans 129 Soy Bean Meal 158 Spaying 101 Speltz 151 Spotted Poland China 188 Stationery 81 Sterility 98 Suffolk 199 Sulphur 139 Summary and Suggestions 170 Sweet Clover 128 Swine House, A Complete 12 System 79 Tamworth Thumps in Young Pigs Treatment of Show Herd On Return Home. . , It's 193 96 58 Uniformity, Value of 53 Victoria 199 Vitamines, Certain Needed 197 Watering, System of 21 Water, Necessity of Plenty of Pure. 21 Water, The Function of 105 Weaning Pigs. 38 Weight for Age 47 What a Breeder of Full Breds Should Be 77 Wheat 146 Wheat Bran 161 Wheat Middlings 160 Winter Quarters, In . 8 Winter Wheat 129 Wood Ashes 137 Worms 95 Yorkshires. . . ... 192 THIS BOOK IS DUE ON THE LAST DATE STAMPED BELOW AN INITIAL FINE OF 25 CENTS WILL BE ASSESSED FOR FAILURE TO RETURN THIS BOOK ON THE DATE DUE. THE PENALTY WILL INCREASE TO 5O CENTS ON THE FOURTH DAY AND TO $1.OO ON THE SEVENTH DAY OVERDUE. UCT 281940 Nu " m 1946 LD 21-100m-7,'40 (6936s) 674619 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY