Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/elementsofrhetorOOdemirich THE ELEMENTS OF RHETORIC By JAMES DE MILLE, M.A. NEW YORK HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS FRANKLIN SQUARK 1882 Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1878, by Harper ^ Brothers, In the OflScc of the Libranan of Congress, at WasRington. PREFACE. The epigrammatic saying, '' Writers are not made by- rhetoric," is not unfrcqucntly quoted as a reason for depreciating a valuable study, and for advocating in its place the practice of exercises in composition. If the only aim of rhetoric were to make good writers, this objection would have to be met and answered; but if it have another and a broader purpose, then its true character should be clearly ascertained and set forth with emphasis. There is an important distinction between rhetoric and composition. The latter is concerned with prac- tical exercises by which the student acquires skill in writing ; the former embraces that wide field of sur- vey by which he makes himself familiar with the qual- ities of literature. The province of each is therefore quite distinct, and where this is not clearly apprehend- ed, there is a danger lest the work of rhetoric as an educational instrument may not be sufficiently appre- ciated, and that it may be neglected for the more prac- tical but altogether different work of exercises in com- position. It may be conceded that great writers, like great poets, are born, not made ; but for the average mind some training is necessary before it can secure the best power of expression. The most direct way towards the attainment of skill and aptitude in this respect is undoubtedly afforded by the practice of composition ; and where this is judiciously carried out it can hardly fail to give to the diligent student the habit of ready and effective writing. But the student cannot pro- iv Preface. ceed far without meeting with something which lies beyond the simpler forms of composition. He be- comes aware of the persuasive power of style, the harmony of words, and the ever -varying features of figurative expression ; he encounters many different modes by which the writer may accumulate the ma- terial for his work, classify his thoughts, and present them in order. Such things as these must be con- sidered in every manual of composition ; and those who write much, and attain to success, will generally acquire a knowledge of the facts and principles which form the subject - matter of rhetorical works, even though such works may never have been read. The direct study of these subjects in a formal treatise may therefore be regarded as of no little importance to those who wish to succeed as writers, since it will give them an early and methodical knowledge of that which otherwise they will only learn after a long period and in an unmethodical manner. But while the number of writers is necessarily lim- ited, the number of those who love literature for its own sake is virtually unlimited. The reading of books is a very different thing from the writing of books; and the class of readers must always far out- number the class of writers. It is to the former that the study of rhetoric chiefly commends itself, since it affords a way towards a larger as well as a finer dis- cernment of those beauties in which they take delight. While, therefore, a knowledge of rhetoric is of great importance to the writer, it may be shown to possess a still higher value as a means of culture and educa- tional discipline. By culture is meant the refining and humanizing influence of art or letters, through which one attains to a more delicate sensibility of taste, and a higher and purer stage of intellectual enjoyment. As a means of culture, literature is at once more accessible, more effective, and more enduring than art. There Preface. v was a time when literary culture was considered pos- sible only with those who studied the ancient classics ; but at the present day a far larger field is recognized. It may arise in many ways, both in art and literature ; and in the latter it niay be effected by the study of German as well as Greek, Italian as well as Latin. For the great purposes of culture Dante is equal to Virgil, Goethe to Homer; while a familiarity with Shake- speare is of itself a liberal education. Of all literatures English \^ the most fully equipped, since it possesses works of the highest excellence in all its departments, many of which can never be surpassed, and some of which have never been equalled. In order to obtain the full benefit of our literature, it should be studied in accordance with some system. In this way the effort after culture may be combined with an educational discipline not inferior to any which may be derived from the ancient classics. There are three modes by which the study of literature may be pursued : first, the philological ; secondly, the historical ; and, thirdly, the rhetorical. The first has reference to the language, its origin and growth, its dialects and idioms; the second concerns itself with the rise and progress of literature, the influences by which it is af- fected, and the character which it assumes in different periods ; while the third has to do with the style of v^ari- ous works, their excellences and defects, together with the principles upon which they are constructed. These three modes may all be carried on simultaneously; and though the teacher may emphasize one beyond the others, it would be a mistake to neglect any one in any scheme of liberal education. As to the first and second, there is at the present day but little danger of such neglect. The taste of the age is eagerly turned to philology and history; for the third there seems to be neither so lively an appreciation nor so vigilant a regard. The study of rhetoric may be regarded as an an- VI Preface. alytical examination of literature. In this way the student is led to investigate the qualities of style, and the various forms of expression employed by different writers. He searches into the causes of literary suc- cess or failure; and endeavors to find out why it is that one author writes with clearness, another with persuasiveness ; one expresses himself with energy, an- other with elegance ; one is distinguished for vivacity, another for sonorous rhythm. He also makes himself familiar with the modes by which the material for com- position is collected, set forth in proper order, unfolded in due course of discussion, amplified, illustrated, and enforced, till the purpose of the writer is attained. Besides this, he pays attention to those higher quali- ties of writing which appeal to the taste and influence the emotions. It will not fail to heighten his appre- ciation of literature thus to examine it from within and from without, to mark its frame-work and observe its adornment, to become acquainted with its beauties and its defects, to tell wherein these consist, to have the nomenclature of criticism and use it intelligently. Such a study, if properly pursued, must surely tend to true culture, and blend with this a fine educational discipline, awakening the more delicate sensibilities of the mind, and calling forth its more robust faculties into active exercise. In the present work an effort has been made to con- sider everything that can properly be regarded as be- longing to the province of rhetoric, and its contents embrace the subjects of style, method, the language of the emotions, and the general departments of litera- ture. Under the head of style, the figures of speech have been subjected to a minute survey ; and while the ancient names have been retained, a new classifica- tion has been adopted so as to make their character and mutual relation clearly apparent. It will not be forgotten that these figures of speech are something more than mere names. They are forms of expres- Preface. vii sion in actual use, pervading all literature, and entering largely into the speech of common life ; so that while their effect upon the development of language may- claim the attention of the philologist, their influence upon literature will not be disregarded by the student of style. Attention has also been paid to that aspect of rhetoric which is commonly described by the term " belles-lettres," under which it approximates in char- acter to the fine arts, and presents for consideration such topics as word-painting, tone, and rhythm. These subjects, and others which need not be enumerated here, form the leading features of style, and disclose the various modes by which the writer attains to clear- ness, harmony, or persuasiveness. Besides this, there is also the preparation of subject-matter, which is here discussed under the name of method, and embraces in- vention, the author's point of view, classification of material, order of thought, argument, and the laws of reasoning. The language of the emotions is also re- garded as appertaining to the sphere of rhetoric, and considered in connection with the beautiful and the sublime, wit and humor, the fantastic and the pathetic. Finally a survey is made of the general departments of literature : description and narration, exposition and oratory, poetry and the drama, in which each of these subjects is investigated in order. So many writers have been consulted in the prepara- tion of this work that an acknowledgment of indebt- edness would be little else than the catalogue of a good -sized library. Wherever special use has been made of any author, care has been taken to give full credit, and if this has not been done in any case, the omission has not been intentional. Some things will be found here which are jottings from memory, or newspaper clippings, the authorship of which could not be traced ; but many others are the common prop- erty of writers on rhetoric, and for the use of these no acknowledgments are due. viii Preface. While a work on rhetoric can hardly contain any- thing new in the subject-matter, it is still possible to exhibit some originality in the mode of treatment. Not a few subjects are discussed here in a way which differs somewhat from that adopted by other writers. A leading feature of the book may be found in the fulness and profusion of the examples and illustrations which accompany the discussion of each topic. No pains have been spared to make these at once appli- cable and accurate, for it has been felt that without these the best definitions and explanations are compar- atively useless. The author's design has been to make his labors sub- serve what he conceives to be the great end of rhetor- ical study. He has endeavored to make his method distinct and intelligible, and in style he has aimed at nothing more than clearness and simplicity. How he has succeeded it is for others to say, but he may be permitted to indulge the hope that this work will not be without some value both to the student and the general reader. CONTENTS. PART I.— PERSPICUITY IN STYLE. Chafi'ER I. Style Page 13 § I. Derivation and Definition of the Term Rhetoric ; § 2. Main Divisions of the Subject ofHRhetoric ; § 3. Definition of Style ; § 4. Style differs among Nations and Individuals ; § 5. Utility of Rules ; § 6. General Divisions of Style. Chapter II. Perspicuity in Words. — Simplicity 17 § 7. Perspicuity Defined and Explained ; § 8. Divisions of the Sub- ject of Perspicuity ; § 9. Sources of Perspicuity in Words ; § 10. Sim- plicity ; § II. Concrete Terms ; § 12. Words of Anglo-Saxon Origin ; § 13. Table showing the Percentage ot Words of Anglo-Saxon Origin ; § 14. Anglo-Saxon the Essential Element in the Language ; § 15. The most Popular Books in the Language show a Preponderance of the Anglo-Saxon Element ; § 16. Many Latin Words equally Simple ; § 17. Importance of the Latin Element in our Language. Chapter III. Perspicuity in Words, Continued. — Precision... 27 § i8. Precision ; § 19. In Substantive Terms ; § 20. In Attributive Terms; § 21. In Predicative Terms; § 22. Clearness of Cooception ; § 23. Care in the Use of Words ; § 24. Synonymous Words ; § 25. Im- propriety ; § 26. Vague Words ; § 27. Verbosity ; § 28. Tautology ; § 29. Circumlocution ; § 30. Verbosity in the Pulpit and the Press. Chapter IV. Perspicuity in Words, Continued.— Purity 41 § 31. Purity; § 32. Obsolete Words; § 33. Obsolete Terminations and Meanings ; § 34, Obsolete Words used in Religious Literature ; § 35. In Poetry ; § 36. In Fiction ; § 37. Archaism ; § 38. Obsolete Words Restored to General Use ; § 39. New Words ; § 40. Their Growth; § 41. Sources; § 42. Rapidity of Increase; § 43. Proper Authority Defined ; § 44. Faulty Use of New Words ; § 45, New Com- pound Words ; § 46. Faulty Use of New Compounds ; § 47. Conclud- ing Remarks on Purity ; § 48. Grammar and Idiom. A2 X Contents. Chapter V. Perspicuity in Sentences Page 56 § 49. Periodic and Simple Structure ; § 50. Rule for Arrangement of Words; § 51. Limitation of Rule; § 52. Unity; § 53. Prominence of the Principal Subject ; § 54- Appended Clauses j § 55. Parenthesis ; § 56. Long and Short Sentences. Chapter VL Perspicuity in General. 72 § 57. Clearness of Conception and Method ; § 58. Conciseness ; § 59. Diffuseness ; § 60. Repetition ; § 61. Digression ; § 62. Loose Style ; § 63. Perspicuity sometimes not aimed at PART II.— PERSUASIVENESS IN STYLE. Chapter L Figures of Speech 85 § 64. Persuasiveness ; § 65. Definition of; § 66. General Divisions ; § 67. Figures of Speech ; § 68. Their Importance ; § 69. Trojjes ; § 70. Various Classifications of Figures ; § 71. Classification adopted in this Work. Chapter II. Figures op Relativity arising from the Idea of Contrast 93 § 72. Figures of Relativity ; § 73. Contrast ; § 74. Antithesis De- fined ; § 75. Its Utility ; § 76. Its Effectiveness in V^arious Departments of Literature; § 77. Antithesis Compared with Plain Statement; § 78. Various Forms of Antithesis ; § 79. Antimctabole ; § 80. Para- diastole ; § 81. Synocceosis, or Enantiosis ; § 82. Oxymoron ; § 83. Pa- rison, Isocolon ; § 84. Prosapodosis. Chapter III. Figures of Relativity arising from the Percep- tion OF Rf^emblance. 102 § 85. The Perception of Resemblance ; § 86. Parallel ; § 87. Diexo- dus ; § 8& Tricola ; § 89. Diallage ; § 90. Metabole ; § 91. Exergasia ; § 92. Paradiastole ; § 93. Comparison ; § 94. Of Degree ; § 95. Of Analogy ; § 96. Of Similarity ; § 97. As an Ornament ; § 98. P'or Ex- planation ; § 99. Faults in the Use of Comparison ; § 100. Metaphor ; § loi. Where one Living Thing is put for Another ; § 102. One Inani- mate Thing for Another ; § 103. Inanimate Things for Things having Life ; § 104. Inanimate Things Represented as Endowed with Life ; § 105. Metaphor used as an Ornament ; § 106. For Explanation ; § 107. To give Elmphasis ; § 108. Faults in their Use; § 109. Mixed Metaphors; § no. Not always Objectionable; § iii. Catachresis ; § 112. Allegory; § 113. Parable; § 114. Fable; § 115. Personitication ; § 116. Apostrophe; § 117. Vision ; § 118. Allusion; § 119. Historical Allusion; § 120. Literary Allusion; § 121. Quotation ; § 122. Plagiar- ism ; § 123. Other Figures; § 124. Irony; § 125. Sarcasm; § 126. In- nuendo. \ Contents. xi Chapter IV. Figures of Relativit\' arising from the Idea of Contiguity Page 134 §.127. Figures of Contiguity; § 128. Synecdoche; § 129. Antimeria, Enallage ; § 130. Metonymy; § 131. Metalepsis ; § 132. Periphrasis; § 133. Euphemism ; § 134- Hypocorisma ; § 135. Litotes ; § 136. Ex- emplum ; § 137. Epithets; § 138. Importance of; § 139. Their Popu- larity ; § 140. In Poetry ; § 141. In Prose ; § 142. Faulty Use. Chapter V. Figures of Gradation — Augmentative 152 § 143. Figures of Gradation ; § 144. Augmentative Figures ; § 145. Amplification ; § 146. By Dwelling upon Details ; § 147. By Direct Statement ; § 148. B^ Comparison ; § 149. Accumulation ; § 15a Col- lectio, Aggregatio ; § 151, Synathroismus ; § 152. Diasceue ; § 153. Synezeugmenon ^ § 154. Epexergasia ; § 155. Dinumeratio ; § 156. De- scription ; § 157. Ecloge ; § 158. Hypotyposis ; § 159. Metastasis; § 160. Climax ; § 161. Incrementum ; § 162. Progressio; § 163. Hyper- bole; § 164. Transgressio. Chapter VI. Figures of Gradation — Decrementim . 168 § 165. Decrementive Figures; § 166. Diminution; § 167. Deprecia- tion ; § 168. Anticlimax. Chapter VII. Figures of Emphasis.— Direct Stress and Itera- tion 172 § 169. Figures of Emphasis; § 170. By Direct Stress.— Assertion ; § 171. Negation ; § 172. Emphasis by Repetition ; § 173. The Iterative Figures; § 174. Epizeuxis ; § 175, Kepctitio Crebra ; § 176. An.ipho- ra ; § 177. Epistrophe ; § 178. Antistrophe ; § 179. Epanaphora ; § 180. Anadiplosis ; § 181. Epanodos ; § 182. Epanalepsis ; § 183. Ploce ; § 184. Symploce ; § 185. Synonymia ; § 186. Alliteration; § 187. Homoeoteleuton. Chapter VIII. Figures of Emphasis arising from the Inversion of Words 182 § 188. Inversion; § 189. In Poetry; § 190. In Prose; § 191. Anas- trophe ; § 192. Synchesis ; § 193. Tmesis ; § 194. Hyperbaton ; § 195. Hysteron Proteron. Chapter IX. Figures of Emphasis arising from an Unusual or Striking Presentation 189 § 196. Unusual Modes of Statement ; § 197. Exclamation ; § 198. Salutation ; § 199. Epiphonema ; § 200. Interrogation ; § 201. Sermo- cinatio ; § 202. Percontatio and Expositio ; § 203. Responsio Sibi Ipsi ; § 204, Parenthetical Figures; § 205. Commentum ; § 206. Appositio and Explanatio ; § 207. Elliptical Figures ; § 208. Ellipse ; § 209. Zeugma; § 210. Synesis ; § 211. Anacoluthon ; § 212. Aposiopesis; § 213. Epanorthosis ; § 214. Interruptio ; § 215. Suppressio; § 216. Asyndeton ; § 217. Pleonastic Figures; § 218. Pleonasm; § 2i9.'Ana. xii Contents. lepsis ; § 220. Polysyndeton ; § 221. Asyndeton and Polysyndeton Con- trasted ; § 222. ParcEmiac Figures; § 223. Proverb; § 224. Apoph- thegm ; § 225. Epigram. Chapter X. Energy Page 204 § 226. Definition ; § 227. Simplicity as Tending to Energy ; § 228. Conciseness ; § 229. Retrenchment of Superfluous Words ; § 230. Pre- cision ; § 231. The Definite ; § 232. The Concrete ; § 233. Demonstra- tive Terms ; § 234- Proper Terms ; § 235. Other Qualities that Tend to Energy ; § 236. Ulustrations ; § 237. Faults of Style as Opposed to Energy. Chapter XI. Vivacity 218 § 238, Definition ; § 239. Vivacity in Thought ; § 240. In Expression ; § 241. Copiousness ; § 242. Versatility; § 243. Brilliancy; § 244, Vivid- ness ; § 245. Felicity of Style ; § 246. Faults of Style as Opposed to Vivacity. Chapter XII. The Illustratfv^e Style. 226 § 247. The Illustrative Style ; § 248. Example ; § 249. Allusion ; § 250. Comparison and Metaphor ; § 251. Anecdote. Chapter XIII. The Epigrammatic St^'le 230 § 252. Epigrammatic Style ; § 253. In Poetry ; § 254, In Prose ; § 255. Faults in the Epigrammatic Style. Chapter XIV. Other Qualities of Style associated with Vi- vacity 234 § 256. Classical Style ; § 257. Suggestive Style ; § 258. Other Terms applied to Style PART III.— HARMONY IN STYLE. Chapter I. Euphony. 239 § 259. Harmony in Style ; § 260. Euphony ; § 261. In Different Kinds of Composition ; § 262. Examples ; § 263. Violations of Euphony in Various Letters and Syllables ; § 264. By Repetition of Words ; § 265. Repetition of Words sometimes Necessary. Chapter II. Elegance. 247 § 266. Elegance ; § 267. Violations of Elegance ; § 268. Affectations ; § 269. Mannerism ; § 270. Colloquialisms; § 271. Slang; § 272. Cant ; § 273. Vulgarisms. Chapter III. The Harmonious Arrangement of Words 254 § 274. Harmonious Arrangement of Words requires Euphony and Elegance ; § 275. Harmonious Succession of Words ; § 276. Modi- fying Words ; § 277. Impersonal Constructions ; § 278. Appended Contents. xiii Clauses ; § 279. Explanatory Words ; § 280. Prepositions ; § 281. Va- riation of Connectives ; § 282. Variety in Clauses ; § 283. Co-ordina- tion of Clauses ; § 284. The Close of the Sentence. Chapter IV. Transitions Page 261 § 285. Harmony in General ; § 286. The Introduction ; § 287. Transi- tions ; § 288. The Formal Transition ; § 289. The Elegant Transition ; § 290. Paragraphs ; § 291. Conclusion. Chapter V. Word-Painting and Onomatopceia 265 § 292. Word-Painting ; § 293. The Music of Words ; § 294. Onoma- topoeia ; § 295. In Poetry ; § 296. In Prose ; § 297. The Latin Element in the English Language Invaluable for Purposes of Harmony. Chapter VI. Rhythm 276 § 298. Rhythm in Poetry ; § 299. Rhythm in Prose. Chapter VII. Qualities of Style associated with Harmony.. 282 § 300. Qualities of Style Conducive to Harmony ; § 301. Figures of Speech ; § 302. Ease of Style ; § 303. Ornament ; § 304. Violations of Elegance ; § 305. Carelessness ; § 306. The Florid Style ; § 307. The Pretentious Style ; § 308. Ostentation ; § 309. Vulgarity. PART IV.— METHOD. Chapter I. Subject-Matter 294 § 310. Method Defined ; § 311. Subject-Matter. Chapter IL The Purpose of the Writer 296 § 312. The Purpose of the Writer; § 313. The Aim to Instruct; § 314. The Aim to Convince; § 315. The Aim to Persuade; § 316. The Aim to Please ; § 317. The Union of Different Aims. Chapter III. Modes of Invention 304 § 318. Two Kinds of Invention; § 319. Accumulative Invention; § 320. Creative Invention; § 321. The Real and the Ideal; § 322. Poetic Fiction ; § 323. Prose Fiction ; § 324. The Two Kinds of In- vention Intermingled ; § 325. Of the Two Kinds, the Creative is the Greater. Chapter IV. The Status 309 § 326. Arrangement of Subject-Matter ; § 327. Status ; § 328. Where the Aim is to Instruct ; § 329. Where the Aim is to Convince or Per- suade ; § 330. Leading Stages of Oratory ; § 331. The Status where the Aim is to Please ; § 332. The Title. Chapter V. Classification • 315 § 333- Classification ; § 334. In Narrative; § 335. In Description; xiv Contents. § 336. Grouping ; § 337. In Exposition ; § 338. Analysis and Synthesis ; § 339- General and Particular Propositions. Chapter VI. The Order of Thought Page 325 § 340. Order of Thought ; § 341. Chronological ; § 342. Logical ; § 343. In Narration ; § 344. Concurrent Streams ; § 345. Retrogression ; § 346. Explanatory Narrative ; § 347, Summary ; § 348. In Exposition ; § 349. Proof; § 350. Refutation; § 351. Examples; § 352. Dramatic Order of Thought ; § 353. Scenic Order of Thought ; § 354. Order of Thought in Dramatic and Narrative Writing ; § 355. General Rule. Chapter VII. Arguments 347 § 356. Arguments ; § 357. Difference between Rhetoric and Logic ; § 358. Logic Defined ; § 359. Reasoning ; § 360. Terms ; § 361. Propo- sitions ; § 362. Definitions ; § 363. Proof; § 364. Deduction ; § 365. In- duction ; § 366. Mill's Four Experimental Methods of Inquiry; § 367. Enthymeme ; § 368. Kinds of Arguments; § 369. Causative; § 370. Illustrative ; § 371. Exemplative ; § 372. Experience ; § 373. Analogy ; § 374. Contrast; § 375. Application of the Different Classes of Argu- ments. Chapter VIII. The Presentation of Arguments 358 § 376. Presentation of Arguments ; § 377. Clearness of Statement and Strengthening of Argument ; § 378. Transition ; § 379. Amplification ; § 380. Diminution ; § 381. Condensation ; § 382. Comprehensiveness ; § 383. Generalization ; § 384. The Definite ; § 385. Description in Oratory ; § 386. Emphasis of Propositions ; § 387. Assertion ; § 388. Denial ; § 389. Apophthegm ; § 390. Digression ; § 391. Repetition of Propositions ; § 392. Recapitulation. Chapter JX. The Introduction 368 § 393. Introduction ; § 394- In Narrative ; § 395. In the Drama ; § 396. In Oratory ; § 397. The Introduction with Reference to its own Character ; § 398. General Nature of the Introduction ; § 399. The Preface. Chapter X. The Conclusion 373 § 400. The Conclusion ; § 401. In Narrative Fiction ; § 402. In His- tory ; § 403. In Biography ; § 404. In the Drama ; § 405. In Oratory ; § 406. Different Kinds of Conclusion. PART v.— THE EMOTIONS. Chaffer L The Beautiful 380 § 407. Influence of the Emotions in Literature ; § 408. Classifica- tion of the Emotions ; § 409. Literary ^Esthetics ; § 410. Theories of the Beautiful; § 411. Definition of the Beautiful; § 412. Taste; § 413. The Beautiful in Nature; § 414. Color; § 415. Form or Fig- Contents, xv ure ; § 416. Motion ; § 417. Sound ; § 418. Proportion ; § 419. Variety ; § 420. Design ; § 421. The Beautiful in Morals ; § 422. The Beautiful in Literature ; § 423. Difference between the Ancient and Modern Idea of the Beautiful. Chapter II. The Sublime Page 395 § 424. The Sublime ; § 425. The Sublime in Nature — the Vast and Boundless ; § 426. Awe ; § 427. The Moral Sublime ; § 428. The Sub- lime in Literature ; § 429. Sources of the Sublime ; § 430. Illustrations ; § 431. Difference between the Sublime and the Beautiful. Chapter IIL The Ridiculous 404 § 432. The Ridiculous ; § 433. Wit ; § 434. Humor ; § 435. Wit and Humor in English Literature ; § 436. The Ridiculous in Literature ; § 437. Without a Purpose ; § 438. With a Purpose ; § 439. Epigram ; § 440. Squib; § 441. Pasquinade ; § 442. Lampoon ; § 443. Bon-Mot ; § 444. Parody ; § 445. Satirical Poetry in General ; § 446. Satirical Writings in Prose ; § 447. Special Forms of the Ridiculous ; § 448. Banter; § 449. Chaff; § 45a Paronomasia; § 451, The Pun; § 452. Retort ; § 453. Repartee ; § 454. Double- Entendre ; § 455. Buffoonery ; § 456. Irony ; § 457. Innuendo; § 458. Sarcasm ; § 459. Sneer; § 460. The Power of the Ridiculous ; § 461. Legitimate Use of the Ridicu- lous ; § 462. Abuse of the Ridiculous. Chapter IV. The Fantastic 428 § 463. The Fantastic Chapter V. The Desires 430 § 464. The Desires; § 465. Self- Preservation ; § 466. Sel f- Esteem ; § 467. Ambition ; § 468. Avarice ; § 469. The Desire for Knowledge. Chapter VI. The Affections 435 § 470. The Affections. Chapter VII. The Passions 437 § 471. The Passions ; § 472. Love ; § 473. Aversion; § 474. Passions associated with Happiness ; § 475. Passions associated with Sorrow. Chapter VlIL Literature of the Desires, Affections, and Pas- sions 442 § 476. Literature of the Affections and Passions ; § 477. Expressing Happiness ; § 478. Sorrow ; § 479. The Pathetic in the Sacred Scrip- tures ; § 480. In Classical Literature ; § 481. In Mediaeval Literature ; § 482. In Modern Literature ; § 483. The Pathetic an Animating Ele- ment in Literature. Chapter IX. Forms of Expression associated with the Emo- tions AND Passions 448 § 484. Forms of Expression relating to the Emotions ; § 485. Where xvi Contents. Superiority is Implied ; § 486. Inferiority ; § 487. Equality ; § 488. Personal Reference. PART VI.— THE GENERAL DEPARTMENTS OF LITERATURE. Chapter I. Description Page 456 § 489. Literature Defined and Classified ; § 490. Objective Descrip- tion ; § 491. Subjective Description ; § 492. The Two Kinds United, Chapter II. Narration 461 § 493. Narration ; § 494. Objective ; § 495. Subjective. Chapter III. Exposition 466 § 496. Exposition ; § 497. Outline of Human Knowledge ; § 498. Classification of Expository Writings. Chapter IV. Oratory 469 § 499. Oratory ; § 500. Debate ; § 501. Controversial ; § 502. Parlia- mentary. Chapter V. The Tactics of Oratory 474 § 503. Tactics of Oratory ; § 504. Conciliation ; § 505. Self-Deprecia- tion ; § 506. Compliment ; § 507. Thanks ; § 508. Concession ; § 509. Confession; § 510. Permission ; § 511. Consultation with the Aadience ; § 512. Emphasis ; § 513. Statement of the Necessity of a Case ; § 514. Statement of a Future Occurrence; § 515. Dwelling upon a Proposi- tion; § 516. Rapid Mention; § 517. Holding the Audience in Sus- pense; § 518. Preparation for What is to Follow; § 519. Unexpected Statement; § 520. Reference to Past Events; § 521. Possibility Con- trasted with Reality ; § 522. Explanation ; § 523. Statement of the Reason for a Thing ; § 524. Answers to Objections ; § 525. Anticipa- tion of Objections. Chapter VI. The Artifices of Oratory 485 § 526. Artifices of Oratory ; § 527. Expression of Doubt or Igno- rance; § 528. Intentional Omission of Words ; § 529. Withdrawal of an Expression; § 530. Apparent Intent; § 531. Supposed Case; § 532. Other Forms of Artifice. Chapter VII. Attack and Defence 491 § 533. Attack and Defence ; § 534. Attack ; § 535. Personal Attack ; § 536. Incidental Reference; § 537. Side-Thrust; § 538. Defence; § 539- Strict Defence ; § 540. Indirect Reply ; § 541. Defence turned into Attack ; § 542. Testimony of an Adversary. Contents. xvii Chapter VIII. Display of Feeling in Oratory Page 498 § 543. Display of Feeling; § 544. Sudden Outburst of Feeling; § 545. Extravagance of Expression ; § 546. Control of Emotion ; § 547. Eulogy ; § 548. Panegyric ; § 549. Retort ; § 550. Sarcasm. Chapter IX. Qualifications for an Orator 504 § 551. Qualifications for an Orator ; § 552. Command of the Subject ; § 553- Fertility in Resources ; § 554. Conciliatory Demeanor ; § 555. Knowledge of the Persons Addressed ; § 556. Adaptation to the Intelli- gence of the Audience ; § 557. Judicious Selection of the Occasion for Speaking; § 558. The Orator should not Aim after too much ; § 559. Physical Advantages; § 560. Moral Qualities; § 561. Intellectual Qualities. Chapter X. Dialogue 513 § 562. Dialogue ; § 563. Didactic ; § 564. Dramatic. Chapter XI. The Drama 515 § 565. The Drama ; § 566. Divisions of Dramatic Literature ; § 567. Origin of the Drama; § 568. Mystery and Morality I'liv-^ : t. !:;69. I'he Greek Drama ; § 570. The Modern Drama. Chaffer XII. Poetry 518 § 571. Poetry ; § 572. Poetry differs from Prose as to the Sentiment ; § 573. As to the Form ; § 574. It Exhibits the Highest Power of Lan- guage ; § 575. It Affords the Strongest Expression for Emotion ; § 576. Poetry Defined ; § 577. Parallelism ; § 578. Quantity ; § 579. Allitera- tion ; § 580. Sequences ; § 581. Greek Ecclesiastical Metres ; § 582. Accentuated Metres ; § 583. English Versification ; § 584. Iambic Me- tres ; § 585. Trochaic Metres ; § 586. Anapaestic Metres ; § 587. Dac- tylic Metres ; § 588. Nomenclature of Metres ; § 589. Interchange of Feet ; § 590. Long Catalectic Syllable ; § 591. Interchange of Metres ; § 592. Other Feet ; § 593. Caesural Pause ; § 594, Rhyme ; § 595. Blank Verse ; § 596. Nomenclature of Verses ; § 597. Species of Poetry ; § 598. Narrative Poetry ; § 599. Lyric Poetry ; § 600. Dramatic Poetry ; § 601. Descriptive Poetry ; § 602. Didactic Poetry ; § 603. Pastoral Poetry; § 604. Satirical Poetry; § 605. Humorous Poetry; § 606. Poems which Share the Characteristics of Several Classes; § 607. New Developments in Versification. ^uhiieiiitt: elements of rhetoric PART I. PERSPICUITY IN STYLE. CHAPTER I. STYLE. § I. DERIVATION AND DEFINITION OF THE TERM RHETORIC. The term rhetoric is of Greek origin, and was first used to signify that which belongs to the pi}ru>p {rhetor^ i. e., orator), a word which is derived from ptw, to speak. The ancient rhetoricians discussed chiefly the art of oratory, leaving to the grammarians the investigation of the beauties of style in general prose composition. In all their definitions of rhetoric they make it the art of persuasion. Isocrates calls it " the worker of persuasion." Plato makes Gorgias define it as " the power of persuasion by speaking." Aristotle defines it as "a faculty of considering all the possible means of persuasion on every subject." Quintilian, after enumerating many definitions similar to these, finally gives his own, and calls it " the art of speaking well." At the present day the meaning of the word is less restricted ; and popular usage involves two separate and distinct ideas. The one refers to arguments, and appeals to the emotions, by which the speaker or writer seeks to convey his own sentiments 14 Elements of Rhetoric. to others. The abuse of this sort of rhetoric is ascribed by Milton to Belial : " His tongue Dropp'd manna, and could make the worse appear The better reason, to perplex and dash Maturest counsels." On the other hand, writing is said to be rhetorical when it ex- hibits more than usual ornament. The abuse of this is popu- larly stigmatized as " rhetorical artifice," '' mere rhetoric," and the like ; thus conveying the idea that rhetoric is only an ag- gregation of plausible words or euphonious sounds, without any adequate sense. The popular idea, though often exaggerated, nevertheless contains the truth, and it is from this that the materials for a proper definition of rhetoric may best be gath- ered. From this we see that the term rhetoric has now a twofold meaning, referring both to the subject-matter and to the mode of Its presentation. In the first case it relates to the subject-matter, its choice and arrangement, where the writer's aim is to instruct, convince, or persuade. Here it may be defined as the art of persuasion. In the second case it relates to the manner of expression, where the writer treats his subject with conscious ornament, not so much in order to win assent ^s to stimulate the atten- tion and gratify the taste. Here it may be defined as the art of ornamental composition. § 2. THE MAIN DIVISIONS OF THE SUBJECT OF RHETORIC. Rhetoric comprehends the following subjects, which will be adopted as the main divisions of the present work : / I. Style^ or the choice and arrangement of words. ^' II. Method^ or the choice and arrangement of subject-matter. III. The Literature of the Emotions. IV. The General Departments of Literature. § 3. DEFINITION OF STYLE. Style refers to the choice and arrangement of words, and may be defined as the peculiar manner in which thought is expressed in language. Style, 1 5 § 4. STYLE DIFFERS AMONG NATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS. When we consider the subject of style in general, we notice that there are great differences in this respect, as well among nations as among individuals. " If we contemplate," says Quintilian, "the varieties of oratory, we find almost as much diversity in the minds as in the bodies of orators. The dis- tinction between Attic and Asiatic orators is of great antiquity ; the Attics being regarded as compressed and energetic in their style, the Asiatics as inflated and deficient in force. Those who made distinctions in these matters soon after added a third kind — the Rhodian, which they define to be of a middle char- acter between the other two." Such differences as these may always be found. In Oriental literature great license is allowed to the imagination ; in European it is held under stricter con- trol. In Europe itself there are strongly marked varieties of national taste. The Italian enjoys a certain warmth of expres- sion which to the Englishman is displeasing. The German, the Frenchman, and the Spaniard, each exhibits in his writings his peculiar characteristics. In every nation also there is a distinc- tive style at different periods. This is illustrated by the well- known division of Latin literature into the ages of gold, silver, and iron ; while in English the same thing is exemplified in the prose of such writers as Hooker, Addison, Johnson, and Macau- lay, each of whom represents a different age. Besides this, we have to consider the personal peculiarities of the individual author, which are so strikingly manifested that a man's writings have come to be considered as much a mark of himself as his face or figure. Thus Bacon exhibits in his essays the force of concise and well-balanced antithesis; Addison, negligent grace; Goldsmith, ease and elegance ; Sterne, sprightliness and wit. The style of Johnson and of Gibbon is elaborate and Latin- ized; that of Bunyan and Defoe is marked by Saxon simplicity; Carlyle displays vehemence and energy ; De Quincey, richness and splendor ; Emerson, epigrammatic point and sparkle. There is a different style for different classes of literature. "That is good rhetoric for the hustings," says De Quincey, " which is bad for a book. Every mode of intellectual com- munication has its separate strength and separate weakness; its peculiar embarrassment compensated by peculiar resources. 1 6 Elements of Rhetoric. It is the advantage of a book that you can return to the past page if anything in the present depends upon it. But return being impossible in the case of a spoken harangue, where each sentence perishes as soon as it is born, both the speaker and the hearer become aware of a mutual interest in a much looser style, and a perpetual dispensation from the severities of ab- stract discussion. It is for the benefit of both that the weight- ier propositions should be detained before the eye a good deal longer than the chastity of taste or the austerity of logic would tolerate in a book." In private life also, in conversation and in letter-writing, the character is revealed in the style. One is harsh and abrupt, another easy and fluent, a third rapid and impetuous, a fourth genial and attractive, a fifth tedious and garrulous. Thus in- dividuals as well as nations impress their personal peculiarities upon their writings; the form of expression always varies with the writer, and this has given rise to the saying that style is the man himself. Style, then, belongs to the man himself; it partakes of the characteristics of the individual ; and the question of the im- provement of this quality becomes the same as the question of the improvement of any other quality. All our powers, whether physical or intellectual, are susceptible of change for the better. Gymnastic exercise develops the muscles ; mu- sical practice gives to the fingers the most rapid accuracy of execution ; the faculties of the mind may be cultivated to an unusual degree of excellence; even the moral qualities may be strengthened by discipline. As by association with polite so- ciety the tone and manners become refined, so by familiarity with the best authors and by imitation of their beauties may the style of a writer be elevated. § 5. THE UTILITY OF RULES. Rhetorical rules are useful but to a limited extent. They themselves have been formed originally not by any creative power or process of argument, but rather from the observa- tion of the best examples and the study of the best authors. Great writers arise and are succeeded by others ; they are after- wards followed by the rhetorician, the grammarian, and the critic, by whom the secret of their composition is investigated; p:nVEP.3ITY Perspicuity in Words^^SSkkplicif^r , k I their excellences, their faults, and their fanww=ftBrfKrtS^and these are studied and compared, until at length it is decided what is to be imitated and what is to be avoided. " Rules," says Quintilian, " are only useful, which not only interpret the law of rhetoric, but also serve to strengthen the faculty of speech. ... In general, bare treatises on art, through too much affectation of subtlety, break and cut down whatever is noble in eloquence ; drink up all the blood of thought, and lay bare the bones, which, while they ought to exist, and to be united by their ligaments, ought still to be covered with flesh." When rules are followed too exclusively, the young writer is apt to become a mere slave to them, and but rarely attains to any kind of excellence. Their real use is to show in a gen- eral way the excellences that are to be followed, and the faults that are to be avoided. After learning these the student is left to himself, and, while he has the benefit of all that he has learned, he must put forth his own strength, and rely chiefly upon this. He must seek to give full play to his own powers, and to exhibit that style which is most in accordance with his own character. § 6. THE GENERAL DIVISIONS OF STYLE. The subject of style may be divided into three general heads, under which may be classified all possible excellences or faults of expression. These are : I. Perspicuity; II. Persuasiveness; III. Harmony. CHAPTER II. PERSPICUITY IN WORDS.— SIMPLICITY. § 7. PERSPICUITY DEFINED AND EXPLAINED. Perspicuity means clearness of expression, and may be de- fined as such a use of words that they may be understood without difficulty by those to whom they are addressed. It may be regarded as the first essential of style, without which all other beauties are of no avail. Indeed, it may be shown that in most cases the so-called beauties of style would be un- i8 Elejuents of Rhetoric. attainable unless in the first place the language be clear and intelligible. In order to be perspicuous, however, it is not necessar)' that the style be understood by all, but that it be un- derstood by those to whom it is addressed. To make style in- telligible to all would be impossible. By the ignorant and un- educated many of the most beautiful thoughts and graceful sentiments of aiwriter like Addison would not be appreciated. In writings connected with science, it is necessary that the reader know something of the elements at least of that science before he can understand what is written. Hugh Miller was commended by Sir Roderick Murchison for his admirable clear- ness, and justly too, yet to one who knows nothing about geol- ogy his "Testimony of the Rocks " would be obscure. In re- ligious works an acquaintance is presupposed not only with the Bible, but also with a large number of theological terms, with- out which the plainest and clearest expressions will often be simply unintelligible. § 8. DIVISIONS OF THE SUBJECT OF PERSPICUITY. Perspicuity may be considered, first, with reference to the choice of words ; secondly, in their arrangement ; and, thirdly, in general composition. § 9. SOURCES OF PERSPICUITY IN WORDS. Some words are clear because they are simple ; others be- cause they are precise ; and others because they are pure English. In each case we have a distinct source of perspicu- ity, which requires special attention. The first of these to be considered is simplicity. § 10. SIMPLICITY. By simplicity is meant the choice of simple words, and their presentation in an unaffected manner. This quality is a chief characteristic of the most ancient literatures, and of the oldest writings in any language. It is very perceptible in the narra- tive portions of the sacred Scriptures. In the Greek Iliad and Odyssey, the German "Nibelungenlied," the Spanish "Cid,"the Norman metrical romance, the English ballads, we find early poetry to be above all things simple and natural ; and the same is true of early prose, as may be seen in the writings of Perspicuity in Words, — Simplicity. 19 the Greek Herodotus, the Italian Boccaccio, the English Mandeville, and the French Froissart. One reason for this is to be found in the condition of language, which in its earlier stages is always fresher and more artless; while in its later developments there is a tendency to elaboration and affecta- tion. As literature grows, the arts of embellishment are made use of to a continually increasing degree ; but there are always many who from their own genius prefer the plain and unaffect- ed manner to the grand and imposing. Such simplicity is often combined with easy grace and tender pathos ; and its effect is more striking in times when an artificial diction is in vogue. Thus, while Johnson was composing his sonorous pe- riods, Goldsmith was writing those delightful passages where wit, humor, philosophy, and pathos are all expressed with that charm which belongs to the unconscious grace of childhood. Among prose writers, Bunyan, Defoe, Addison, Steele, Sterne, and Thackeray are conspicuous for this quality ; and among poets, Cowper, Burns, and Wordsworth. This subject may be illustrated by the following verses, which are translated from the German of Elizabeth Gliick : " That thy true soul May wed with mine, And that I may Be ever thine, " I pray, and trust In God's sole might To keep us one, And so — good-night." The charm of unaffected simplicity is nowhere more touch- ingly exhibited than in the following lines by Wordsworth : "She dwelt among the untrodden ways Beside the springs of Dove, A maid whom there were none to praise And very few to love. **A violet by the mossy stone Half hidden from the eye ! Fair as a star when only one Is shining in the sky. B 20 Elemejits of Rhetoric, " She lived unknown, and few could know When Lucy ceased to be ; But she is in her grave, and oh. The diflference to me !" § II. CONCRETE TERMS SIMPLER THAN ABSTRACT. The simplest and most intelligible words are those which de- scribe common things and common actions. Opposed to these are all general and abstract terms. The difference between these two classes of words may be seen by comparing a plain narrative of fact with exposition in philosophy. Concrete terms are understood without trouble, but abstract terms give rise to difficulty. The respective effects of these are visible in other qualities of style and departments of literature ; for while they have a direct bearing upon perspicuity, they assume a greater importance in connection with energy of expression and the language of the emotions ; and they will receive fur- ther consideration in the discussion of those subjects. § 12. WORDS OF ANGLO-SAXON ORIGIN CONDUCIVE TO SIMPLICITY. Simplicity is best attained by the employment of words of Anglo-Saxon origin. The English language has a power of absorbing foreign words which distinguishes it from all others, and makes it capable on this account alone of becoming the dominant speech of the world. It has received contributions from many sources ; but by far the largest class of words which have thus far been ab- sorbed by our mother tongue consists of those which have had a Latin origin. The chief cause of this is to be found in the Norman conquest, which, by subjecting the English people to the influence of a race of men who spoke a language derived from the Latin, caused the introduction of many words out of that vocabulary. After this the admission of words of Latin origin was easier, and the influence of the universities and of the learned class has ever since tended towards the multiplication of such words. Thus our language is at present highly Latin- ized, and presents to the cursory observer a twofold character, being in part native English, or Anglo-Saxon, as it is called, and in part Latin. In order to arrive at a knowledge of the true proportion of these words in our language, it is not sufficient to examine die- Perspicuity in Words, — Simplicity. 21 tionaries ; for these contain a large number of technical terms, which, being chiefly derived from Latin and Greek, show a pre- ponderance of words of foreign origin. The true way of judg- ing is by an examination of the literature. From an examination of the dictionary, Dean Trench comes to the following conclusion : Suppose the English language to be divided into one hundred parts ; of these, to make a rough distribution, sixty are Anglo-Saxon ; thirty are Latin ; five Greek ; the other five parts are to be divided among all the other languages from which isolated words have been de- rived. But when the works of standard authors are examined a dif- ferent result is obtained. Such an examination was made by Sharon Turner, and the estimate reached by him has been widely adopted. But his examination was very slight, since the passages from each author did not consist of more than a hundred or a hundred and fifty words. A more thorough and extensive search was made by Mr. George P. Marsh, the result of which is ^o be found in his " Lectures on the English Language." The following table is the result of another examination, made in the same manner and upon the same scale as that of Mr. Marsh. § 13. TABLE SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF WORDS OF ANGLO- SAXON ORIGIN IN DIFFERENT BOOKS. THE ENGUSH BIBLE AND PRAYER-BOOK. Ruth 96 Jonah 93 Malachi 91 The Book of Common Prayer — Morning Service 87 POETRY. Cursor Mundi — ^418 lines 96 Piers Plowman, Passus 1 92 Chaucer, Man of Lawes Tale — 560 lines. 89 Shakespeare, Midsummer-Night's Dream, Act 1 92 " King John, Act 1 89 Milton, Lycidas 87 Spenser, Faerie Queene, Book V., Canto 1 88 Dryden, Religio Laici 80 Butler, Hudibras, Canto I. — 500 lines 88 Pope, To Augustus 81 22 Elements of R/ietoric. Cowper, The Task, Book 1 80 Scott, Lay of the Last Minstrd, Canto 1 90 Wordsworth, Ode on Immortality 88 Shelley, Revolt of Islam, Canto 1 85 Byron, Prisoner of Chillon 91 " Childe Harold, Canto IV., stanza cxl to close 83 Tennyson, Vivien 90 Robert Browning, Christmas Eve 88 Mrs. Browning, The Poet's Vow 89 Keble, Christian Year — 5 poems 88 Poe, The Raven 85 Longfellow, The Building of the Ship 89 PROSE FICTION. Defoe, Robinson Crusoe. The Shipwreck Scene, 8014 words. . 93 Bunyan, Pilgrim's Progress, 3000 words. 93 Scott, Bride of Lammermoor, Chapter III 80 Lord Lytton, Rienzi, Chapter 1 85 Charles Dickens, Pickwick- The Bagman's Story 90 George Eliot, Middlemarch, Chapter 1 80 ESSAYS AND EXPOSITORY WRITINGS. Hooker's Ecclesia^ical Polity, Book I., Chapters IV., V., VI. . 89 Junius, Letter III. to Sir William Draper 75 De Quincey, Apparition on the Brocken, and Savannah la Mar. 82 Macaulay, Preface to the Lays of Ancient Rome 76 Emerson, Essay on Circles 80 Henry Rogers, Review of Sydney Smith's Lectures on Moral Philosophy 71 Hamerton, Intellectual Life. To a Solitary Student 72 HISTORY. Gibbon, Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Chapter LIV.. 68 Hallam, Constitutional History, Chapter VII 70 Alison, History of Europe. Introduction 68 Froude, History of England, Chapter I. (one half) 77 Freeman, History of the Norman Conquest, Chapter 1 77 Motley, History of the Dutch Republic, Chapter 1 75 Draper, Intellectual Development of Europe, Chapter 1 67 ORATORY. Chatham, on the Address to the Throne 72 Burke, on the Nabob of Arcot's Debts 74 Grattan, on Irish Right 73 Erskine, on Paine's Age of Reason 73 Brougham, against the Durham Clergy 75 Bishop Butler, Sermon on the Ignorance of Man 80 Rev. F. W. Robertson, Sermon on the Doubt of Thomas 82 Perspicuity in Words, — Simplicity, 23 WORKS ON RHETORIC. Blair, Rhetoric. Introduction 69 Campbell, " " 69 Whately, " " 68 NEWSPAPERS. London Times, on the Eastern Question 72 London Telegraph, " " 7° Pall Mall Gazette, " " 80 New York Herald, " Presidential Election 67 New York Tribune, " " 7° New York Sun, " " 73 The above table leads to the follownig conclusions : 1. In the literature of the present day there is a larger pro- portion of words of Anglo-Saxon origin than would appear from an examination of the dictionaries. 2. In poetry the proportion of such words is larger than in prose. 3. From the above a new table may be deduced, showing the relative proportion of Anglo-Saxon words in different depart- ments of literature : 6. Oratory 76 7. History 72 8. Newspapers 72 9. Works on Rhetoric 69 1. The English Bible 93 2. The Prayer-book 87 3. Poetry 88 4. Prose Fiction 87 5. Essays 78 Surprise may be felt at the large proportion of Anglo-Saxon words in prose fiction ; but this may be accounted for, first, because it deals largely with domestic affairs and matters of a trivial and commonplace character ; and, secondly, because it abounds in dialogue, and all the colloquialisms of common con- versation. § 14. ANGLO-SAXON FORMS THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENT IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Anglo-Saxon constitutes the essential element in the Eng- lish language. This may be seen from the following summary : 1. English grammar is almost exclusively Anglo-Saxon. 2. To Anglo-Saxon belongs the vocabulary of common life, with all our colloquialisms, idiomatic phrases, and the language of conversation. Among the uneducated this is very marked ; 24 Elements of Rhetoric. but it is almost equally so in those circles where the best and purest English is spoken ; for there the proportion of Anglo- Saxon words is higher than in contemporary literature, and the undue use of words of Latin origin is regarded as pedantic, or in bad taste. The chief difference between colloquial and lit- erary English is the predominance in the former of our primi- tive speech. 3. To this may be added the language of business ; of the street, market, and farm ; of sailor and fisherman ; and of most of the ordinary pursuits of life. 4. It comprises the language of the emotions — love, hate, hope, fear, sorrow, shame, and the like. It has given names to most of those objects which are associated with our strongest feelings — as home, hearth, fireside, life, death, sickness, health ; and claims the words of childhood and youth, which for all after-life have the deepest meaning and are surrounded by the most moving associations. The Anglo-Saxon speech which the child learns at his mother's knee is the speech which he best loves in the hour of death. 5. While general and abstract terms are derived from the Latin, those which are special and definite are Anglo-Saxon. This is illustrated in the following way in an essay by Henry Rogers : " ' Move ' and ' motion ' are general terms of Latin origin ; but all the special terms for expressing varieties of mo- tion are Anglo-Saxon, as, 'run,' 'walk,' 'leap,' 'stagger,' 'slip,' 'step,' 'slide.' 'Color* is Latin, but 'white,' 'black,' 'green,' 'yellow,' 'blue,' 'red,' 'brown' are Anglo-Saxon. 'Crime' is Latin, but ' murder,' ' theft,' ' robbery,' ' to lie,' * to steal ' are Anglo-Saxon. ' Member' and 'organ,' as applied to the body, are Latin or Greek, but ' ear,' ' eye,' ' hand,' ' foot,' ' lip,' ' mouth,' ' teeth,' ' hair,' ' finger,' ' nostril ' are Anglo-Saxon. 'Animal' is Latin, but 'man,' 'horse,' 'cow,' 'sheep,' 'dog,' *cat,' 'calf,' 'goat' are Anglo-Saxon. 'Number' is Latin, but all our cardinal and ordinal numbers as far as a million are Anglo-Saxon." § 15. THE MOST POPULAR BOOKS IN THE LANGUAGE EXHIBIT A PREDOMINANCE OF THE ANGLO-SAXON ELEMENT. From the foregoing statements it will be seen that words de- rived from Anglo-Saxon sources are always the simplest and Perspicuity in Words. — Simplicity, 25 the most intelligible. These form the vocabulary of children, of the uneducated ; and in the language of social intercourse even of the most cultivated classes such words outnumber those of Latin origin far more than in general literature. If we seek for the most intelligible books in the language, we shall find them in those which are most widely circulated ; and if we seek for those which are most widely circulated, we shall find that by universal consent they are the following : the English Bible, the Pilgrim's Progress, Robinson Crusoe, and Gulliver's Travels. The English Bible, for various reasons, surpasses all other books in circulation. The authorized ver- sion is rightly considered as the noblest body of English prose which the language possesses. Its excellence may best be seen from a comparison with other versions. If it be compared with the " Douay " Bible, the inferiority of the latter will at once be apparent ; and this inferiority is owing to the fact that the translators of the " Douay " version were not sufficiently alive to the superior force and clearness of Anglo-Saxon words, and adopted many of Latin origin. In the authorized version, on the contrary, the proportion of Anglo-Saxon words is greater than in a^ny other English book, Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress stands next to the English Bible in point of circulation, and has the same characteristics, name- ly, great simplicity of style, and a great preponderance of Anglo-Saxon words. This may be illustrated by the opening sentences : " As I walked through the wilderness of this world I lighted upon a cer- tain place, where was a den, and laid me down to sleep; and as I slept I dreamed a dream, and behold 1 saw a man clothed with rags standing in a certain place, with his face from his own house, a book in his hand, and a great burden upon his back. I looked and saw him open the book, and as he read he wept and trembled ; and, not being abl& to contain, he brake out into a lamentable cry, saying. What shall I do ?" In this passage ninety-three per cent, of the words are of Anglo-Saxon origin. About thirty years ago a new version of the Pilgrim's Prog- ress was published in England " for the use of the children of the aristocracy." It was written by a clergyman, who was of- fended at what he considered the " vulgarity " of Bunyan. His version was chiefly characterized by a superabundance of long 26 Elentejits of Rhetoric. words of Latin origin, and was a melancholy exhibition of min- gled ignorance, ineptitude, and bad taste. It never attained to any circulation, and is long since forgotten. If we compare with the above the following passage from Burke, a great difference will be perceived : "This idea of a liberal descent inspires us with a sense of habitual native dignity, which prevents that upstart insolence almost inevitably adhering to and disgracing those who are the first acquirers of any distinction. By this means our liberty becomes a noble freedom. It carries an imposing and majestic aspect. It has a pedigree and illustrating ancestors. It has its bearings and its ensigns armorial. It has its gallery of portraits, its monu- mental inscriptions, its records, evidences, and titles. We procure reverence to our civil institutions, on the principle upon which nature teaches us to revere individual man ; on account of their age, and on account of those from whom they are descended." In this passage only sixty-three per cent, of the words are of Anglo-Saxon origin. § 1 6. MANY LATIN WORDS ARE EQUALLY SIMPLE. Although words of Anglo-Saxon origin are, as a whole, the most simple and perspicuous, yet it must be observed that very many words of Latin origin are equally so. Such words have been long in the language, and have become so thoroughly nat- uralized that it is only by a di^stinct effort of the mind that any difference of derivation can be seen. Those writers who seek above all things after clearness and intelligibility, are therefore not expected to avoid good and useful words merely because they are of Latin origin, for this would be doing violence to the genius of our language, but merely to avoid" such as are not in common use ; and, again, when an Anglo-Saxon word is as ex- pressive as a Latin word, to give the former the preference. § 17. IMPORTANCE OF THE LATIN ELEMENT IN OUR LANGUAGE. Apart from the subject of perspicuity, the Latin element in our language is of inestimable value, and tends to give it that comprehensiveness, that all-expressiveness, and that rich and va- ried music which make English literature the crown and glory of all the works of man. For by being made up of these two elements, the English language exhibits the strength, tender- ness, and simplicity of the Teutonic tongues, together with the euphony, sonorousness, and harmony of the Latin. Perspicuity in Words* — Precision, 27 CHAPTER III. PERSPICUITY IN WORDS, CONTINUED.— PRECISION. § 18. PRECISION. Another essential to perspicuity is precision, which consists in the selection of such words as may exhibit neither more nor less than the meaning which the writer intends to convey. Precision may also be defined as the choice of the best possible word, so as to express the idea with the greatest possible ac- curacy. It refers in the first place to exactness of expression; but where ideas are expressed in the most exact manner pos- sible, there are other results beside perspicuity. Thus we find that where precision is attained there is not only clearness, but great energy and emphasis. When we examine the works of writers who are most noted for precision, we find that they are conspicuous not only for clearness, but also for great force of expression. Such writers are foremost in literature; their works are studied by all; they are models of style ; and they abound in sentences which are widely quoted, and used as common maxims or proverbial say- ings. Of such writers the most eminent is perhaps the poet Pope, who made this peculiar quality his chief aim. § 19. PRECISION IN SUBSTANTIVE TERMS. The subject of precision will be best considered by an ex- amination of the constructions in which its presence is most marked. These are: ist, Substantive terms; 2d, Attributive terms ; 3d, Predicative terms. I. Substantive terras. I. Precision may be seen here, first, in the application of terms or designations. An example of this may be found in the following passage from Junius (to the Duke of Grafton) : " I do not give you to posterity as a pattern to imitate, but as an example to deter ; and as your conduct comprehends everything that a wise or hon- B2 28 Elements of Rhetoric. est minister should avoid, I mean to make you a negative instruction to your successors forever." There is great delicacy of expression associated with great subtlety of conception in this sentence. It is a common thing to speak of actions that should be imitated, and which thus be- come instructive ; but it is more unusual and more difficult to speak of actions that should be avoided, and make them a " negative instruction." This criticism is also applicable to the following passage from Burke's Letter to the Duke of Bedford : " If his Grace can contemplate the result of this innovation . . . viithout a thorough abhorrence of everything they say and everything they do, I am amazed at the morbid strength or the natural infirmity of his mind." " Morbid strength " is suggestive of the capacity to inflict evil which belongs to the man familiar with wickedness and cruelty; "natural infirmity" indicates one who^ lacks common intelligence, and contemplates crime with the stolidity of an idiot. The alternative presented here with such refinement of language is the same as that which would be stated by a less skilful writer in the abusive terms "villain" and "fool." 2. Precision is sometimes attained by the use of proper names, especially where a name is put for a class. This is illustrated by the following lines from Pope : "What can ennoble sots, or slaves, or cowards? Alas I not all the blood of all the Howards." Here there is a close and accurate specification of different classes of men, concluding with the mention of a class by the word " Howards," where one well-known name is put for noble families in general. ♦• And more true joy Marcellus exiled feels Than Caesar with a senate at his heels." Great precision is gained here by the use of these names, the one of an exiled patriot, the other of a triumphant t)Tant. " If parts allure thee, think how Bacon shined, - The wisest, brightest, meanest of mankind !" Precision is shown here in selecting Bacon from among all men as the highest example of human genius. The summary of his character affords a still better instance. In these three Perspicuity in Words. — Precision. 29 words are found that popular estimate of this great man which prevailed at that time, and to which this memorable line gave new emphasis. 3. Precision in substantive terms is also seen when they as- sume the form of definitions or explanations. There is great care and accuracy in the treatment of the fol- lowing passage from Disraeli's speech on the death of the Duke of Wellington : ♦' The Duke of Wellington left to his countrymen a great legacy, greater even than his glory. He left them the contemplation of his character. I will not say that his conduct revived the sense of duty in England. I will not say that of our country. ' But that his conduct inspired public life with a purer and more masculine tone, I cannot doubt His career rebukes restless vanity, and reprimands the irregular ebullitions of a morbid ego- tism." The true meaning of this passage is to be found in the care- fully chosen words of the conclusion ; yet in order to heighten their precision, and give them increased emphasis, the speaker introduces them by mentioning that which he will not say, and by these very words he insinuates with g^eat delicacy the very fact which he represents himself as unwilling to state. The same method is followed by Burke, when he says, " I do not say I saved my country, I am sure I did my country im- portant service. There were few indeed that did not at that time acknowledge it." In the following passage there is a careful definition : " I mean to give peace. Peace implies reconciliation ; and where there has been a material dispute, recondliation does in a manner imply conces- sion on the one part or the other." — Burke. 4. Precision is very striking in antithetical sentences. " To make a virtue of iie€essity."~SHAKESPEARK. Here the contrast of "virtue" with "necessity" renders each word more distinct in its meaning; •• There is, however, a limit at which forbearance ceases to be a virtue."— Burke. Here the stress is laid upon "forbearance" and "virtue," which are each more sharply defined by contrast. " Kings will be tyrants from policy when subjects are rebels from prin- ciple." — Burke. 30 Elements of Rhetoric. The word "kings" is here contrasted with "subjects;" "ty- rants" with "rebels;" "policy" with "principle;" and the ar- ray of such terms in opposition results in a careful accuracy of meaning. Junius, in his letter to the Duke of Grafton, says with his usual malignity : " In this humble imitative line you might long have proceeded safe and contemptible. You might probably never have risen to the dignity of be- ing hated, and you might even have been despised with moderation." This is one of those passages upon which Junius expended an unusual amount of the care and study that, according to his own statement, characterized his composition. The antithesis of "safe" and "contemptible" may be noticed, and also that of " hated " and " despised." The studied-bitterness with which Junius wrote was never more forcibly displayed than in such expressions as "have risen to the dignity of being hated;" "despised with moderation;" and the sting lies in the perfect precision of the words. § 20. PRECISION IN ATTRIBUTIVE TERMS. II. We have, in the second place, to consider precision in attributive terms. I. This is especially seen in the application of epithets, and may best be illustrated by selecting some one subject, and com- paring the ways in which it is presented by different writers. The sea affords a theme upon which many poets have loved to dwell, and whose powers they seek to set forth by vivid de- scriptive words. Byron's lines are familiar to all : •' Roll on, thou deep and dark blue Ocean, roll." "Deep and dark blue" is an expression of the most general kind, without any very definite force or meaning. Barry Corn- wall's lines are equally familiar: " The sea, the sea, the open sea. The blue, the fresh, the ever free 1" " Open," " blue," " fresh," " free," are all words which lack precision; they are commonplace, and might suggest them- selves to any writer. Far different from these is " the multitu- dinous" sea of Shakespeare, which is full of suggestions of roll- Perspicuity in Words. — Precision. 31 ing billows and resistless power; while in the very sound of the word itself there is something that is not unlike the thing which it represents. The uvi]ptd^ov yiXaa^a of ^schylus (the infinite laughter of ocean waves) is of a higher description ; and the iro\v(p\oi(Tl3oio daXaafTjjq of Homer has become proverb- ial for pregnant meaning and sonorous music. These last have a rare precision and effective force, which have made them ad- mired in all ages, and have caused them to be quoted so often that they have become hackneyed by repetition. The songs of birds form another favorite theme for the poets, and especially that of the nightingale. It will be instructive to compare the epithets applied to this by various writers. " It is the hour when from the boughs The nightingale's high note is heard."— Byron. Here the epithet " high " is general, and of no particular meaning. It is quite evident that the poet wrote this with- out thinking very much about the real nature of the thing de- scribed. Far different from this is the description of the same thing by Keats, whose genius led him irresistibly to all forms of the beautiful : *' While thou art pouring forth thy soul abroad In such an ecstasy, Still wouldst thou sing, and I have ears in vain. To thy high requiem become a sod." The epithet "high" is here used, but in conjunction with other words which greatly refine and at the same time enlarge the meaning. The same poet also says : " Adieu, adieu, thy plaintive anthem fades Past the near meadows." A different character is here ascribed to the note of the nightingale ; and still another by Milton in the following : "The wakeful nightingale. She all night long her amorous descant sang." " Plaintive" and " amorous" are words which are very differ- ent, yet they each state in a precise and specific manner the poet's thought ; while such general terms as " high," " low," " musical " are little better than conventionalisms, and are sug- 32 Elements of Rhetoric. gestive of such expressions as the " brave" soldier, the " bright" sun, the " dark " night. With these may be compared Wordsworth's lines to the cuckoo : " O cuckoo, shall I call thee bird, Or but a wandering voice? Even yet thou art to me No bird, but an invisible thing, A voice, a mystery." In such words as these there is revealed a rare power of im- aginative conception and great accuracy of expression. They are as far as possible from the commonplace, and form the lan- guage of true poetry. Finally, let us take a few lines from Shelley's Ode to a Skylark : "In profuse strains of unpremeditated art. I have never heard Praise of love or wine That panted forth a flood of rapture so divine. With thy clear keen joyance, Languor cannot be." Words like these carry us up to the heights of poetical inspira- tion. The poet's mind is overpowered by his theme, yet his capacity for expressing that theme never fails him. His words set forth with exquisite refinement and subtlety the most deli- cate and evanescent tints of meaning. Describing the song of a skylark may be compared to an artist's attempt to paint a rainbow; yet in this attempt Shelley has not failed. He has tested to the uttermost the capacities of language, and has ex- hausted its resources in this wonderful ode. 2. Precision in attributive terms may also be seen in the de- scription of qualities, and in the use of qualifying terms. **Such language," says Burke, "might have been spared, were it only as a sacrifice to the ghost of departed friend- ship." He alludes here to his rupture with Fox. A commonplace statement would have been something like, " were it only from consideration for our former friendship ;" but in these words all this is expressed, while much more is implied. Perspicuity in Words. — Precision. 33 Landor exhibits the same thing in a fine passage where he speaks of the difference between Shakespeare and Bacon : " There is as great a difference between Shakespeare and Bacon as be- tween an American forest and a London timber-yard. In the timber-yard the materials are sawed and squared and set across ; in the forest we have the natural form of the tree, all its growth, all its branches, all its leaves, all the mosses that grow about it, all the birds and insects that inhabit it ; now deep shadows absorbing the whole wilderness ; now bright bursting glades, with exuberant grass and flowers and fruitage ; now untroubled skies ; now terrific thunderstorms ; everywhere multiformity ; everywhere immensity." This description of a forest displays distinctness of conception and accuracy of statement; but its chief virtue consists in the fact that it is applied figuratively to Shakespeare ; so that from the framing and setting forth of this comparison there arises another and a higher beauty. § 21. PRECISION IN PREDICATIVE TERMS. III. In the third place we have to consider precision in predicative terms. I. These may refer to acts. This may be illustrated by the following passage from Thackeray : " It is said the king winced when he first saw his homely little bride ; but, however that may be, he was a true and faithful husband to her, as she was a faithful and loving wife." Compare the word " winced" with such common expressions as " shrank back," " felt disgusted," " was disappointed," and its precise force will at once be apparent. The word " homely" also has a meaning of its own, which makes it most appropriate in its application. " Mother, for love of grace, Lay not that flattering unction to your soul That not your trespass but my madness speaks ; It will but skin and film the ulcerous place. Whiles rank corruption, mining all within, Infects unseen." — Shakespeare. This whole passage affords a study in precision. Its figura- tive character does not at all detract from this, but rather aug- ments it. " Lay not that flattering unction to your soul " is one of those Shakespearian phrases which have entered into 34 Elements of Rhetoric. our common speech by virtue of its expressiveness. " Skin " and " film " are singularly exact and suggestive. " It is not that you do wrong by design, but that you should never do right by mistake."— Junius. The contrast between these two acts is sharply drawn, and, as usual with Junius, full of malicious insinuation. 2. They may refer to the state or condition. An example is found in Milton's lines: " Fallen cherub, to be weak is miserable, Doing or suffering." The conciseness of this statement is equalled by its keen distinctness. " One flaunts in rags, one flutters in brocade." Pope exhibits here his usual exactness of expression in coupling these particular verbs with these particular nouns. Gouverneur Morris, writing of Lafayette, says: " Dreadful situation ! Obliged to do what he abhors, or suffer an igno- minious death, with the certainty that the sacrifice of his life will not pre- vent the mischief" This painful position in which Lafayette was placed could not be presented with greater vividness or distinctness. § 22. CLEARNESS OF CONCEPTION NECESSARY TO PRECISION. The chief essential to precision of expression is clearness and accuracy of conception, for when the writer thinks with certainty he will generally express himself with certainty. Ob- scurity of style, vagueness of statement, loose and inaccurate phraseology will generally be found to originate in hasty or careless conceptions; for when the mind is at no pains to acquire a firm grasp of the subject, no clear and definite de- scription can be expected. Precision must, therefore, be sought after in the first place by securing a clear and luminous view of that which is to be set forth. § 23. AND ALSO CARE IN THE USE OF WORDS. It by no means follows, however, that even a clear view of the subject will of itself result in a clear statement. It is well Perspicuity in Words. — Precision. 35 known that very many who are masters of particular sciences fail to impart them to others with any degree of precision. In order to attain to this, it is therefore further necessary that the writer attend very closely to the study of words, their choice and arrangement. The two processes are quite distinct; nei- ther can dispense with the other; and while, in the first place, the subject must be mastered, so it is equally necessary that close attention be paid to the best modes of expression. § 24. VIOLATIONS OF PRECISION. — THE FAULTY USE OF SYNONYMOUS WORDS. We have next to consider the most frequent ways in which precision is violated. I. In the first place, precision is violated by the faulty use of synonymous words. Synonymous words are those which express similar ideas. The fault spoken of arises when they are used to express the same idea ; and as there is always a shade of difference in the meaning of these, it follows that precision can only be attained to when such words are used with perfect accuracy. This is a point of great importance in the English language; for synon- ymous words are more frequent here than in any other. The cause of this lies in its formation : for, as has already been shown, there was a primitive English language, now for con- venience' sake called Anglo-Saxon, upon which was superim- posed another — the Norman-French. The consequence is that there are many words of Anglo-Saxon and Norman origin now in the language, which exist side by side, and express very similar ideas. Besides this, the English, in common with other cultivated languages, is rich in words that differ by nice shades of meaning, and to all of these the writer must pay special attention. A familiar example of this is to be found in the Book of Com- mon Prayer, where the following words are associated together: acknowledge and confess; sins and wickedness; dissemble arid cloak; humble, lowly, penitent, and obedient; goodness and mercy; assemble and meet together; pray and beseech; pure heart and humble voice ; erred and strayed ; godly, right- eous, and sober life, etc. Synonymous words may be said to be similar as to their gen- 36 Elements of Rhetoric, eral meaning, but dissimilar as to their specific meaning. This is illustrated by the following : Female zxidi feminine. — Female is said of the sex itself Fem- inine of the qualities of the sex. A third term, effeminate, may also be mentioned, which is applied to feminine qualities dis- covered in a man. Untruth— falsehood. — In the former there is no intention to deceive, and the absence of truth may arise from ignorance ; in the latter the deceit is intentional. Figure — trope. — Figure is a general term applied to certain artificial forms of expression ; trope is a special term indicating that kind of figure by which a word is turned from its literal signification to another of a different kind — as, the sword of state. Modest — bashful. — Modest refers to the habit of mind, bash- ful-to the state of feeling; the one is commendable, the other reprehensible. Economy^^rugcLlity ^parsimony. — Economy means the man- agement of outlay in accordance with income ; frugality, a lim- ited expenditure from motives of self-restraint or temperance; parsimony, a limited expenditure from motives of avarice. Effect — consequence. — An effect proceeds from a cause ; a consequence follows something that stands to it simply in the relation of antecedent. Centre — middle. — Centre involves the idea of a circle, middle has a more general application. Macaulay says, " the centre of the grand alley," in which he shows a lack of his usual pre- cision. Happiness— blessedness. — Blessedness is applied to those who enjoy the divine favor, and who may not be actually happy, as " Blessed are they that mourn." In a recent translation of the Scriptures this is changed to " Happy are they that mourn." The translator, while aiming after a supposed verbal accuracy, has thus missed the whole point of the passage, which is the " blessedness " of affliction. § 25. IMPROPRIETY. 2. Another violation of precision is called impropriety. It often happens that one word is used for another of a to- tally different signification. There is a resemblance either in Perspicuity in Words, — Precision. 37 the appearance of two words, or in their sound, and by this the writer is misled. This must not be confounded with the fault just mentioned. Synonymous words have similar meanings; these words now under consideration have totally different meanings, and are only similar in sound or in appearance. The following are some of the most conspicuous exam- ples : Demeati. — "I would not demean myself" is an example of impropriety in the use of this word. The mistake arises from its resemblance to the adjective mean, i. e., base, low. But the true signification of the word is " to behave," as may be seen in the substantive "demeanor." I lay and I lie. — These are often confounded. Additional confusion arises in the employment of the past tenses. The forms are — Present — lay^ Past — laid. Present— //>, Past — lay. The resemblance between the present of one and the past of the other leads to frequent mistakes. The most memorable example of impropriety in this respect is found in Byron's famous lines: "And send'st him shivering in thy playful spray And howling to his gods, where haply lies His petty hope in some near port or bay, And dashest him again to earth; there let him lay." Here we see both the right and the wrong use of the same word. Sit and set are apt to be confounded in precisely the same manner as lay and lie. Decompose — discompose. — A foreigner once said, speaking of a bashful friend, that his face was very much decomposed. Errors of this kind, purposely made, have giv en rise to a feeble sort of wit called malapropism. Loose — lose. — The mistakes that occur here are perhaps gen- erally due to the spelling, as these words are seldom or never confounded in common conversation. Sanitary — sanatory. — Sanitary is from sanitas, health; sana- tory, from sano, to heal. The former is subjective, the latter objective. 38 Elements of Rhetoric. Predicate— predict. — Predicate is to assert one thing of an- other; predict, to foretell the future. Ingenuous — ingenious. — The former suggests frankness and guilelessness; the latter intellectual skill or cleverness. § 26. VAGUE WORDS. Another fault arises from the use of words that are vague and general, instead of such as are exact and definite. This is a characteristic of those who think loosely, or who prepare their subject-matter carelessly, and are as destitute of distinct ideas as they are of accurate words by which to express them. General terms are always more convenient than special; and to make use of any one at random will save trouble, and pre- vent the difficulty of searching after one which may be more appropriate. There are many words which are thus made use of, and a few of these may serve as examples. .Affair. — This word is made to do duty for almost anything — a battle, a conversation, a convention, a revolution, or a re- ligious revival. Circumstance is used in the same general way. Considerable is a favorite word with writers who are inaccu- rate - TTTerature; and though not in general use, they are, neverthe- less, understood without difficulty. These offer important limitations as to the degree to which words become obsolete. A definition of the term may be given as follows : Obsolete words are those which are no longer used in good prose litera- ture or in common conversation. Of such the following may be taken as examples : " peradventure," " anon," " astonied," "erst," "hight," "cleped," "yclept," "whilom," "iwis" or 42 Elements of Rhetoric. "I-wis," "erewhile," "ne," "list," "wist,*' "wight," "twain," "eke," "yea," "verily." § 33. OBSOLETE TERMINATIONS AND MEANINGS. In addition to this, there are certain terminations of words which have become obsolete. These are chiefly in " en " and " eth," the one being an old form of the plural, and the other a well-known verbal inflection. Certain compounds of the pro- noun with the substantive verb may also be considered as obsolete in this sense, as, "'tis," "'twas," "'twere." Another class may be found in words which have changed their signifi- cation, in which case it is the meanings and not the words that are obsolete. Thus "admirable'' once meant "surprising;" "to be amused" meant "to be occupied;" "brave" meant "gaudy;" "caitiff"," "captive;" "chimney," "stove;" "corpse," a " person ;" " desire," " regret ;" " equal," " impartial ;" " ex- plode," "to hiss off";" "generous," "high-born;" "imp," a "scion" (of nobility) ; " lively," " living ;" "mediterranean," " inland ;" " novelist," an " innovator ;" " pomp," a " proces- sion ;" "spice," a "sort;" "table," a "picture;" "wit," "in- telligence." § 34. OBSOLETE WORDS USED IN RELIGIOUS LITERATURE. Certain important limitations are, however, to be observed on this subject, for in some departments of composition words are freely admitted which are obsolete in general prose. The first of these departments is that of religious literature, which is largely modified by the English Bible. This is essentially an ancient book. It has gone through many versions, namely, those of Wycliffe, Tyndale, Coverdale, the Bishops' Bible, Cran- mer's, and that of King James, which is at present used. Most of these were revisions of preceding editions, rather than new translations, and retained many words and phrases which had been used before. The version of King James is of a more antique cast than the prose of the contemporary writers of that age. This great English book has had a circulation far sur- passing that of any work ever published in the language ; it has served as a perpetual storehouse for allusion, quotation, and reference ; and its most ancient forms of speech are as familiar to all as the most modern colloquialisms. Now in re- Perspicuity in Words. — Purity. 43 ligious works of all kinds, constant reference is made to this English Bible. Its words are not only quoted directly, but are also appropriated and incorporated with the phraseology of other writers. On this account an antique character pervades the larger portion of our religious literature, and words are freely used here which on no account would find admission into a magazine article, a newspaper editorial, or any work in general prose composition. Besides the English Bible there is the Book of Common Prayer, whose influence over language and literature has been of a similar character. The tendency to make use of obsolete words in religious writing is seen still more strikingly in the whole vocabulary of prayer. Deity is addressed in those forms of speech which the associations of the past, the usage of the English Bible and Prayer-book, and the phraseology of relig- ious writings have combined to invest with deep solemnity and venerable antiquity. § 35. OBSOLETE WORDS USED IN POETRY. An exception is also to be made in favor of poetry, for the free use of obsolete words forms part of what is called poetic license. Poetry requires a different phraseology from prose, a lan- guage in some sort of its own. A poetic dialect exists in all languages, but in English it is more strongly marked and more copious than in any other ; and, among other peculiarities, it is distinguished by the possession and use of many of those words which are considered obsolete in general prose. For poetry requires the largest possible vocabulary, it strains the resources of language to the uttermost, and if an old word may best ex- press the poet's meaning, it is made use of without hesitation. The causes of this may be found in the general characteristics of poetry, which may be stated as follows : 1. The style is more exalted. Subjects are treated of which would not be considered at all in any other way. For instance, prose could not be applied to such themes as the Divina Com- media or the Paradise Lost. 2. The thought is more vivid and intense. Lyrical poetry has a high impassioned character altogether diverse from the nature of sober prose, and its effects are commensurate with C 44 Elements of Rhetoric. that character. This may be illustrated by a literal translation into English prose of such a poem as the French " Marseilhiise." 3. The exigencies of metre demand an unlimited supply of words in order to make the verse run smoothly, and yet secure the highest poetic excellence of expression. 4. The exigencies of rhyme require for the poet the same liberty. Thus we shall find that the very words which are not allowa- ble in general prose are welcome to poetry, and this may be seen from the following examples : '■^Whilom in Albion's isle there dwelt a youth Who ne in virtue's ways did take delight ; Ah me ! in sooth he was a godless 7oight^ Childe Harold was he highty — Byron. "I who erewhtU the happy garden sang." — MrLT9N. " Eagerly I loved to borrow from ray books surcease of sorrow." — PoE. ".As his corse to the ramparts we hurried." — Wolfe. ** iTvis in all the senate There was no heart so bold." — Macaulay. The use of obsolete terminations is still more conspicuous in poetry. The poets discard the modern terminations in the hissing " s," and cling to the musical old endings in " en " and "et h ;" 6r, rather, it would be more correct to say that they use either form with equal liberty. The result is, however, that all the beautiful and expressive words and euphonious endings that have ever existed in the language are cherished by the poets ; and so it has been said that those forms of speech which have died in the world of prose go up to live forever in the heaven of poetry. § 36. OBSOLETE WORDS USED IN CERTAIN KINDS OF FICTION. Another exception is to be noted in works of fiction, where there is an attempt to represent an earlier period. Here the first aim is verisimilitude, and the writer must avail himself of everything that contributes to this. To imitate the language of a given period in a general way is often an effectual means of securing the truth of resemblance ; and hence many obso- lete words make their appearance, used by the imaginary char- acters of the age to which they belong. The old words and the old idioms then appear with good effect. Yet even here these Perspicuity in Words, — Purity, 45 words must be used correctly, and not too extensively. The abuse of this liberty is seen in the inferior order of so-called historical novels, , where the writer, undertaking to handle a subject to which he is unequal, interlards the dialogue of his characters with obsolete words and formulas selected at ran- dom from the works of old authors. § 37. ARCHAISM. To this employment of obsolete words in the departments of literature above mentioned the term archaism is applied ; and this may be defined as the intentional use of the older words and terminations of a language. § 38. MANY OBSOLETE WORDS RETURN INTO GENERAL USE. The use of obsolete words in general prose literature is not of common occurrence, nor, when it happens, is it to be con- sidered as a very serious offence. It is, in fact, somewhat diffi- cult to say what words are really obsolete, and what are not ; for religious literature and poetry have so familiarized old words to the reader that they are seldom obscure, and their employment becomes a question of taste, rather than of per- spicuity or of grammatical purity. In fact, obsolete words are regarded with much favor by many of the best writers of the present day. Increased attention to the study of early English has led to a very general effort to revive the use of many words. Accordingly a large number may be found which have actually come back into prose literature after a temporary banishment. These words have held their own in poetry and in religious literature, and thus have easily returned to general prose. We may see in a comparatively recent period the revival of such words as "benison," "malison," "outrance," "plea- saunce," "guerdon," and others of a like nature. Nor is this revival confined to our own time, although it is certainly more extensive now than ever before. Obsolete words have been introduced in former periods, as may be seen from a few brief statements. In Spenser's day objections were made to such words as "dapper," "scathe," "askance," "embellish," "forestall," " fain," and others which soon came into general use. In the seventeenth century the following words of Chaucer 46 Elements of RJietoric. were considered obsolete : " anthem," " carve," " blithe," "bland," "franchise," "sphere," "transcend." About the same time other words were called obsolete ; as " strath," "landlouper," "yelp," "thrill," "dovetail," "kirtle," "grisly," " ledge," " trenchant," " tissue," " plumage," " resource," " vic- inage," " tapestry," " villainy." All these, and many others like them, though once rejected by critics, are indispensable to prose literature at the present day. As a general thing the restoration of a word to current prose literature is now regarded as a matter for gratification rather than objection. It often happens that such a word actually expresses the writer's idea in the best possible manner ; and under such circumstances perspicuity itself might seem to de- mand its use. Such a writer as Carlyle, for instance, does not hesitate for a moment about using an obsolete word if it hap- pens to express his meaning better than others that are in more familiar use. The faulty use of obsolete words is where they are really obscure, or where their introduction may savor of affectation or pedantry on the part of the writer. § 39. NEW WORDS. We have next to consider the introduction of n6w words. Among the Greeks this was stigmatized as a barbarism ; but the English language is less exclusive. - Language is a living thing, and has a life of its own. It is born ; it grows ; it flourishes ; it languishes ; and it dies. Its life resembles that of man, both as an individual and in com- munities; and is characterized by innumerable vicissitudes. In connection with this subject, it will be useless to talk vaguely of the importance of purity ; to denounce all words that may not please ; or to insist on the rejection of all that may not have already gained a place in the language. The class of new words will always be a large one, so long as the language itself has any vitality. § 40. THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE HAS ABSORBED NEW WORDS INTO ITSELF IN EVERY AGE, IN SPITE OF OBJECTIONS. If we look back upon the history of the English language, we find it exhibiting a moi;^ varied growth than any other. It has passed through several distinct periods : the Anglo-Saxon, Perspicuity in Words. — Purity. 47 the Semi-Saxon, the Old English, the Middle English, and the Modern English ; and in each of these it has had remarkable features. Ever since the Norman Conquest it has shown a singular capacity for absorbing new words into itself. In the latest period, when it stands fully formed before us, we find this tendency as strong as ever ; and we have to regard it as a leading characteristic. Inventions and discoveries are con- stantly being made which require new forms of expression. Science makes the same demand, which is repeated by learn- ing, philosophy, art, commerce, and other great movements among mankind. While in every age there has been a throng of new words pressing in upon the language, there has also been in every age an outcry raised against them. This outcry, how- ever, has been of little avail ; and the history of the past shows us many such words which once were objected to, but which, in spite of objections, have prevailed, and are now in general use. In 1534 Sir Thomas Elyot mentioned " frugality," " temper- ance," " sobriety," and " magnanimity " as modern words. In 1589 Puttenham called the following modern inventions : "function," "numerous," "penetrate," "indignity," "savage," "scientific," "dimension," "idiom," " compendious," " prolix," "figurative," "impressive," " metriral," "inveigle." In 1601 Philemond Holland gave the same character to' the following : " acrimony," " austere," " bulk," " consolidate," " debility," " dose," " aperient," " opiate," " propitious," " symptom." Ba- con did not know "encyclopaedia," but used "circle learning." Shakespeare, in Twelfth Night, alluded to "element" as new; and Wotton spoke of " characters " as a recent acquisition. Fulke, in the beginning of the seventeenth century, objected to scandal," "neophyte," "despicable," "de- ." Thomas Fuller stated that "plunder " was imported from Germany, where it originated during the Thirty- Years' War. "Malignant," "cavalier," "Roundhead," and " selfish " arose during the Parliamentary War. " Pathos " arose a little later ; as did also " mob." In 1658 the follow- ing were objected to in Heylin's Observations on L'Estrange's History of Charles 11. : " adoption," " abstruse," "amphibious," " articulate," " adventitious," " complicated," " compensate," "concede," "caress," "destination," "horizontal," "oblique," :** ocular," " radiant." " Dragonnade " and " refugee " came into 48 Elements of Rhetoric. use during the age of Louis XIV. In 1670 Dryden objected to "good graces," "repartee," "embarrass," "grimace," "cha- grin." " Suicide " was condemned at about the same time. In Skinner's Etymologicon, 1688, "cajole," and "sentiment" were called new. Johnson was blamed for using "resuscita- tion," "narcotic," "fatuity," "germination." " Sans-culotte," "guillotine," and " terrorism " arose during the French Revolu- tion ; and hosts of new words have been coming into the lan- guage ever since. § 41. SOURCES OF NEW WORDS. The sources from which new words are derived are numer- ous, and may be set down as follows : 1. Science and Learning. — Science is continually enlarging its sphere. The old sciences are widening their scope and increas- ing their action ; while, in addition to these, new ones arise which rival the old in importance. Geology, Mineralogy, Compara- tive Philology, and many others, have arisen in this age ; and all these require a nomenclature of their own. The names which are thus required are generally made up from Greek or Latin roots. All the natural sciences have created new words of this sort, which are intelligible to the students throughout Christendom. With technical terms, literature has not much to do ; but some of them pass into literary use, and of these the following may serve as examples : " encyclopaedia," " meth- od," " function," " nomenclature," " horizontal," " oblique," "objective," "subjective," "aesthetic," " ethicj" " ethnic," " iso- thermal," "telegraphy," "statistics," "myth," "cult," "mag- netism." 2. Invention. — As this is pre-eminently the age of invention, the field here is very wide, and new words come in from this source by the hundred. Of these many must perish, but, on the other hand, many survive. A large number are made up from Greek roots, some from Latin. The following are exam- ples : "telescope," "microscope," "chronometer," "telegraph," " photograph," " stereoscope," " micrometer," " aeronaut," " velocipede," " bicycle," " elevator," " locomotive." 3. Discovery. — Some discoveries are made in science by which words arise that are generally of Greek or Latin origin, as " hydrogen," " oxygen," "gravitation." Others refer to the Perspicuity in Words. — Purity, 49 vegetable world, and are illustrated by " tea," " coffee," " tobac- co," " cocoa," " opium," " potato." 4. Art. — A large number of words in common use have been derived from this source. For example, in architecture we have " dome," " piazza," " veranda ;" from painting, " tone," "fresco," "ultramarine;" from sculpture, " bust," " torso," " bas- relief;" from engraving, "mezzotint," "lithograph," "chromo- lithograph ;" from music, " opera," " oratorio," " prima donna ;" besides which are many words belonging to other departments of art, such as " mosaic," "cameo," " intaglio," " filigree," etc. 5. Fashion. — Here the words are innumerable, but the most of them are shortlived, and few, indeed, are those which endure. " Surtout," "paletot," and "galoches," once in general use, are now obsolete ; but permanent words from this source may be illustrated by " tunic," "muslin," " calico," etc. 6. National Afovettients. — These include wars, revolutions, and other popular commotions. The words derived from these are numerous, and are illustrated by " Puritan," " Roundhead," "Whig," "Tory," "cabal," "clique," "caucus," "coup-d'^tat." 7. Foreigti Intercourse. — From this source we have many for- eign words which have become naturalized, as "shah," "czar," "sultan," " pacha;" "drosky," " kayak," "canoe ;" " sombrero," " poncho ;" " stiletto," " creese ;" " mustang," " barbe ;" " taboo," " tattoo," etc. 8. Colonizing Movements. — The English race, in extending it- self over all parts of the world, has developed new modes of life, and with these new words have sprung up. California and Australia have contributed many which have come into general use; for example, "diggings," "prospect," "lead," "cradle," " ranch," " bush," " bushwhacker." 9. Americanisms. — The rapid growth of the American nation has been characterized by the utmost activity of intellect, and multitudes of words have arisen which were before unknown. Such as are peculiarly American may be illustrated by " sen- sation," " medium," " spirit-rapping," " camp-meeting," " barbe- cue,*^ " baggage," " barrens," " bobolink," " buncombe," "clap- board," " dime," " stump-^p,eech," etc. 10. Orientalisms. — The British empire in the East, the great missionary operations of England and America, and the spread of commerce and travel, have brought many words into the 50 Elements of Rhetoric. language from the whole of Asia, as " bungalow," " moon- shee," " pundit," " fakir," " bonze," " santon," " dervish." LI. New Ideas. — The progress of civilization tends to create new sensations and new ideas, for which names must be found. Thus the French were the first to devise a word for the sensa- tion of tedium, which they called "ennui." The English have applied to this the name " bore." This class of words may be illustrated by "prestige," "coincidence," "amateur," "connois- seur," " pluck," " push," " bounce." 12. New Verbs. — These are formed from nouns already in use ; as, " to telegraph," " to coal " or " coal up," " to steam away," " to switch off." 13. Names of Men. — New words are formed from the names of men in cases of discovery or invention. Such are found in "galvanism," "voltaic" pile, "guillotine," "bowie" knife^^" mac- adamize." Others are formed from the names ofmose who have promulgated new doctrines, or headed movements among men,as"Wesleyan," "Garibaldian," "Benthamite," "Comptist," " Millerism." Others are formed from the qualities of men, as " Platonic," " Miltonic," " Napoleonic." 14. Slang. — From this source, also, many words are derived. Originating no one knows how, perhaps in the most disreputable way, they evince a native force and expressive energy which compel reception. Of this sort are the following : " mob," "humbug," "quiz," "chaff;" "hoax," "beau," "dandy," "fop," " swell," " Bohemian," " prig," " cad," " bumptious." ' New words are furnished to the English by many different languages, and if we compare these, we shall find that several have supplied distinct classes. Thus Greek and Latin con- tribute those which relate to science and learning, invention and discovery ; French, those which refer to fashion, cookery, and warfare ; Italian, those which belong to art ; Hebrew has contributed some which belong to the vocabularj' of religion, and a large number of proper names in general use. § 42. THE GROWTH OF NEW WORDS IS RAPID. The growth of new words is very rapid. What is a barbar- ism in one age is a standard word in the next. Examples of this may be found in "connoisseur," "reconnoitre," "verbiage," "gasconade," " rhodomontade," which were all objected to by Perspicuity in Words. — Purity. 51 Dr. Campbell in his Philosophy of Rhetoric, yet since his time have become thoroughly naturalized. § 43. THE OBJECTIONABLE USE OF NEW WORDS. — PROPER AUTHORITY DEFINED. New words are objectionable when they are employed with- out proper authority. 'i'his term " authority " has given rise to such frequent mis- apprehension that it may be well to explain its true significa- tion. It may be defined in a twofold way. 1. It is the usage of a writer of commanding genius and in- fluence. Thus Shakespeare, Addison, and Johnson intro- duced new words, to which their names afterwards gave a sanc- tion. In our own day Carlyle, Coleridge, Tennyson, and Browning have introduced or given currency to new words, and made strange ones familiar. 2. It is the sanction of the literary world of any given period; and at the present day may be defined as the usage of the leading periodicals. From this source have been derived such words as " telegram," " bicycle," " unwisdom," and many others which have held their ground in spite of strenuous opposition. Generally new words come in to supply a real want. No one knows who uses them first. If they are really needed they are welcomed by the world of literary men, and thus take a permanent place. But if a word present itself without the sanction of supreme genius, or the consent of the world of let- ters, then it may properly be rejected as a barbarism. § 44. THE FAULTY USE OF NEW WORDS. Such objectionable words are derived from various sources. 1. Some originate in our own language, and of these the following are examples: " happify," " gasalier," "unuseful," " charmfulness." The verb " to interview " was at first ac- cepted in jest, then violently denounced, and finally, by a strange fate, it appears to be accepted with mournful resigna- tion, and may actually take a permanent place. 2. Many words are taken from the French language, and abound in fashionable novels and in newspapers. " Politesse," " delicatesse," "hauteur," "dernier-resort," "exposition," for " exhibition," are examples of constant occurrence. The word C 2 52 Elements of Rhetoric. " solidarity " appears to be winning its way in spite of opposi- tion ; and so does " plebiscite," simply because they express ideas for which there are no exact English equivalents. The excessive use of words of this sort has been parodied in the following passage : " The ball was most recherche. Madame presented an appearance that was distingue in the extreme. The toilettes oi les jenties dames were ravissantes. On entering the room the coup-d'oeil was magnifique^ and the tout-ensemble could not be surpassed." 3. The Italian language, also, affords words of this sort. These are chiefly to be found in writings which refer to art, particularly music. When they are used in a purely techni- cal sense no objection can be made ; the fault is when they are introduced into general literature. To intermingle with one's English such words as "maestro," "impresario," "fiasco," is as bad a piece of affectation and as reprehensible a vice as the one just mentioned. Those writers who know and love the English language find it all-sufficient. Those who really un- derstand Italian and French are not apt to indulge in such idle display. It is rather the characteristic of those who have but a slight acquaintance with these languages, and are anxious to make known to the world all the little that they know. 4. Many are derived from the Latin, and are introduced through a pedantic taste, or the desire for a cheap display of learning. Examples of this may be found in the following words: "centrical" for "central," "envisaging" for "view- ing," "resuming" for "summing up." The word "donate," for "give," is bad; but not worse than "locate" for "live." "Effectuate" and "eventuate" are in bad taste and preten- tious. " Collide " is a word which has fought its way into re- spectable use. " Sororize," as the counterpart of " fraternize," and " viatricide," as a name for death by railway accident, seem to have been made up in jest. " Governmental " and " pessi- mistic " are both as bad as they can be. 5. Oriental words. These are very common, on account of the increasing connection with the East, through commerce, politics, travel, missionary effort, and the like. Many Oriental words have come into established use, but many more must be condemned. The excessive employment of these has been ridiculed in the following passage, which may serve to illustrate Perspicuity in Words. — Purity. 53 this sort of barbarism : " While seated in the bungalow^ waiting for the /f7/^//^«///, there arose a sudden outcry from the Tatmut- gars, followed by rapid drum-beats. We started up, but the moonshee, noticing our agitation, said,* Don't be alarmed, Sahiby it's only the Gooroos with their tomtoms''' § 45. NEW COMPOUND WORDS. In addition to those words which are absolutely new, there is another class made up of old words already existing, but pre- sented as compounds. Two classes of compound words are here to be observed. First, those of foreign derivation. To this class belong those which are derived from Greek or Latin sources, and are lised for scientific or other purposes. These, however, come into the language already compounded, and therefore belong to the new words already mentioned. The point now under dis- cussion refers to a second class, namely, those new compounds which are made up of words already existing in the English language. The growth of language arises chiefly from two causes : first, tropes, by which concrete terms are turned from a literal to a figurative meaning; and, secondly, composition, by which words already existing are compounded, and thus formed into a new term. All languages in their early stages have this power of composition, and a large number of words in every language are compounds. The English language has less power of composition than any other of the Teutonic family. The Latin was very defi- cient in this respect, and the languages which have been derived from it show the same peculiarity. The Greek, on the other hand, had a great capability for this, which belongs in an equal degree to the modern German. The Anglo-Saxon had the same capacity; but in the Early English period it had be- come weakened if not lost, and the decay of this power in our language is chiefly due to the influence of the Norman French. When we consider the newly compounded words of the present day, we find that their source is chiefly in science and invention. Leaving aside Greek and Latin compounds for rea- sons already mentioned, let us consider those of English origin. I. Science and Learning. — In these departments we have such 54 Elements of RJutoric. words as " stone-period," " flint-folk," " bronze-folk," " mound- builders," " folk-lore," " hand-book." 2. Invention. — "Steamboat," "railroad," "diving-bell," "sew- ing-machine," "tramway," "gun-cotton," "iron -clad," "gas- pipe." 3. Discovery. — " India-rubber," " soapstone," " gum-tree." 4. The movement called "Spiritualism" has given rise to many words, such as " table-tipping," " spirit-rapping," etc. § 46. FAULTS IN THE USE OF NEW COMPOUND WORDS. The genius of the English language is so alien to the forma- tion of compound words that faults are not as frequent here as elsewhere. The influence of other languages in the introduction of new words has already been noticed. Greek, Latin, French, and Italian furnish a large supply; but upon the class of words now under consideration these languages have no influence. The Greek and Latin give us words already compounded, but they do not cause the English language to make new com- pounds out of words already in use. Another language has some influence in this respect, and that is the German. This is due to several causes. 1. The German has a power of composition not equalled by any other of the great modern languages. 2. German philosophy has a commanding position, and is illustrated by several schools, each of which has its own nomen- clature made up out of German words; and English thinkers who discuss philosophical subjects are often forced to transfer German compounds to their own language. 3. These words in many cases have roots which exist in Eng- lish also. In the case of scientific writing every liberty must be allow- ed ; and as the botanist may freely make use of Greek words, so the metaphysician may employ German. But in general literature the case is different, and English imitations of Ger- man compounds are to be condemned. These may be illustrated by such terms as the following: "Word-building," "time-spirit," "nature-spirit," "earth-soul," "woman-nature," "world-idea," "hero-saint," "art-show," "soul-life," "wonder-smith," "life-pleasure," "youth-season." Another class of objectionable compounds may be found in Perspicuity in Words. — Purity. 55 cases where a noun is turned into a verb, as " the population had fivefolded." Here the word fivefold is transformed into another part of speech. We may say " the population had doubled" or "tripled," but not "fourfolded" or "fivefolded." These last resemble such expressions as "to dress-make," "to shoe-make," " to ship-build," which are sometimes used in jest, but never in earnest. § 47. CONCLUDING REMARKS. In concluding this subject, we may notice several important truths. 1. Obsolete words in certain branches of literature are al- lowable, and even in general prose they are not so unwelcome now as formerly, but may be used under certain restrictions. 2. New words are incessantly coming forward, and much discrimination is needed in order to decide what are and what are not offences against purity of style. 3. Compound words, though far less numerous, stand in the same position as new words. 4. In every age grammarians and rhetoricians have de- nounced words, which have come into use in spite of them. 5. In view of these facts, the best course to be taken by one who seeks to preserve purity of style is to maintain a judicious conservatism. This is best stated in the lines of Pope : " In words as fashions the same rule doth hold, Alike fantastic if too new or old ; Be not the first by whom the new is tried, Nor yet the last to lay the old aside." § 48. PURITY ALSO REQUIRES CONFORMITY TO GRAMMAR AND IDIOM. In order to write pure English, it is further necessary that there be no departure from those forms of speech which are established by the laws of grammar or sanctioned by the best idiomatic usage. The violation of either of these is called a solecism. This word is of Greek origin, and is said to have arisen from the corruption of the Attic dialect among the Athenian colonists of Soloe, a town in Cilicia. The solecism includes all violations of good usage, all those faults in speech commonly called " bad grammar." It is not 56 Elements of Rhetoric. necessary to dwell upon the importance of grammatical correct- ness in style. It must be evident that pure English consists in something more than well-chosen words ; and that these words, when connected together in phrases, must accord with the standard which has been established by the best authority^ English grammar requires far more attention than it usually receives from the literary man. It may not be so logical or so symmetrical as that of the classical languages, and there may be not a few points about which professed grammarians differ; yet it may be affirmed that this very looseness and comparative lawlessness arises from the world - wide comprehensiveness which distinguishes it, and it should incite every writer to mas- ter whatever difficulties there may be. — The solecism is a subject that belongs to grammar, and not to rhetoric, and all violations of the rules of syntax may be found fully discussed in the works of Latham, Fowler, Angus, and others. CHAPTER V. PERSPICUITY IN SENTENCES. § 49. PERIODIC AND SIMPLE STRUCTURE. Perspicuity depends not only upon the choice of words, but also upon their arrangement. Sentences, in their various divisions of simple, complex, and compound, naturally fall into two great classes — long and short ; and these produce such an effect upon the manner of compo- sition that style itself has been classified upon this basis. Where the writing is chiefly characterized by long sentences, it has been called '' style periodique,'' and also '' style soutenu ;" where short sentences abound, it has been called ''style coupL" These words, however, have not yet been naturalized in our language, and the terms "periodic structure" and "simple structure " are for various reasons preferable. Of the two, the simple structure is the more conducive to perspicuity, for where the sentences are long great care is needed that the clauses be kept in their proper order and relation ; that the leading subject Perspicuity in Sentences. '5J' be retained prominently before the mind ; and that too many things be" not crowded together. In short sentences the diffi- culties are not so great ; and although they have their own faults, yet obscurity is by no means one of them. French prose literature is considered by competent critics as superior to all others in perspicuity, and it is a significant fact that the simple structure prevails there to a greater extent than elsewhere. The French writer aims in the first place to make his meaning clear, and seems to feel instinctively that this aim may be best secured by the short sentence. On the other hand, that of Germany is distinguished by its lack both of brilliancy and perspicuity ; while at the same time it is marked by the frequent recurrence of long, clumsy, and unwieldy pe- riods. German prose literature has produced no group of great writers like those of Rome, France, and England ; and its chief fault lies in the persistent choice and careless treatment of long sentences. The genius of the language commends the periodic structure to the German writer, but this is no excuse for the awkward manipulation of words. In English prose there are abundant examples of both styles. The long sentence characterizes the writings of Hooker, Milton, Johnson, Gibbon, and De Quincey, while the short sentence is the chief feature in Bacon's Essays, and in the works of Addi- son, Sterne, Lamb, and Macaulay. This subject is well presented by De Quincey in the follow- ing passage : " In French authors, whatever may otherwise be the differences of their minds or the differences of their themes, uniformly we find the periods short, rapid, unelaborate. Pascal or Helvetius, Condillac or Rousseau, Montes- quieu or Voltaire, Buffon or Duclos — all alike are terse, perspicuous, brief. Even Mirabeau or Chateaubriand, so much modified by foreign intercourse, on this point adhere to their national models. Even Bossuet or Bourda- loue, where the diffuseness and amplitude of oratory might have been plead- ed as a dispensation, are not more licentious in this respect than their com- patriots. One rise in every sentence, one gentle descent — that is the law for French composition, even too monotonously so ; and thus it happens that such a thing as a long, involved sentence could not be produced from French literature, though a sultan were to offer his daughter in marriage to the man who should find it. "The character of German prose is an object of legitimate astonishment. Whatever is bad in our o^vn ideal of prose style, whatever is most repulsive in our own practice, we see there carried to the most outrageous excesa •58 Elements of Rhetoric. Lessing, Herder, Richter, and Lichtenberg, with some few beside, either prompted by nature or trained upon foreign models, have avoided the be- setting sin of German prose. . . . Among ten thousand offenders we would single out Immanuel Kant. ... A sentence is viewed by him, and by most of his countrymen, as a rude mould or elastic form admitting of expansion to any possible extent ; it is laid down as a rude outline, and then, by super- struction and ^//-superstruction, it is gradually reared to a giddy altitude which no eye can follow. Yielding to his natural impulse of subjoining all additions or exceptions or modifications, not in the shape of separate con- secutive sentences, but as intercalations and stuffings of one original sen- tence, Kant might naturally enough have written a book from beginning to end in one vast hyperbolical sentence." English prose literature affords abundant examples of each style ; some authors prefer the short sentence, others the long, while others again exhibit in their writings an equal proportion of both. The following is an example of the simple structure : "The allies had during a short time obtained the most appalling suc- cesses. This was their auspicious moment. They neglected to improve it It passed away and returned no more. The Prince of Orange arrested the progress of the French armies. Louis returned to be amused and flattered at Versailles. The country was under water. The winter approached." — Macaulay. With this may be contrasted the following example of the periodic structure : " Were I ambitious of any other patron than the public, I would inscribe this work to a statesman who, in a long, a stormy, and at length an unfor- tunate administration, had many political opponents almost without a per- sonal enemy ; who has retained on his fall from power many faithful and disinterested friends,.and who under the pressure of severe infirmity enjoys the livdy vigor of his mind and the felicity of his incomparable temper." — Gibbon. In all vivacious writing, the simple structure is very gener- ally employed ; and it lends itself readily to a brisk and brill- iant movement of thought : " Don't tell me that I am giown old and peevish and supercilious ; name the geniuses of 1774, and I submit. The next Augustan age will dawn on the other side of the Atlantic. There will, perhaps, be a Thucydides at Boston, a Xenophon at New York, and in time a Virgil at Mexico and a Newton at Peru. At last some curious traveller from Lima will visit Eng- land, and give a description of the ruins of St. Paul's, like the editions of IJaalbec and Palmyra."— Horace Walpole. Perspicuity in Sentences. 59 In graver composition, especially of the didactic sort, the periodic structure is more common. This is especia.