STUDIES IN LITERATURE. By the same Author. SHAKSPERE: a Critical Study of his Mind and Art. Eighth Edition. Post Svo. Cloth, price I2s. " He has an unusual insight into the broader as well as the nicer meanings of Shakspere. . . . The book contains many valuable remarks on the drama." — Saturday Review. " Entitled to the honourable distinction due to thoroughly prepared materials and elaborate workmanship. . . . Every page bears such marks of thought and care both in matter and in manner." — Examiner. POEMS. »•« Second Edition. Fcap. Svo. 'Cloth, price 5s. "There are indications of poetic feeling and of a sensitiveness to natural beauty, which will make his (Mr Dowden's) poems welcome to many readers." —Pall Mall Gazette. KEOAN PAUL, TRENCH & CO.. 1 PATERNOSTER SO., LONDON. Studies in Literature i 789-1877. hy EDWARD DOWDEN, LL.D. PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN, AUTHOR OF ; ' SHAKSPfiRE— HIS MIND AND ART," il POEMS," ETC. FOURTH EDITION London : kegan paul, trench & co., 1 paternoster square. 1887. rl D7* f &f£ >h _0RNIA PREFACE. In bringing these Essays together I carry out the inten- tion with which they were originally written. Without forming a continuous study they circle around common thoughts and topics, and so 1 in a measure belong to one another. The' first three essays put in position some of the subjects and persons treated in detail in the latei essays ; there is therefore occasionally some repetition, the first essays saying in brief what others express more at large. I had intended to add to- these introductory essays a fourth on the Mediaeval Revival, but I found that this great movement could not be viewed as seemed to me right without a more comprehensive survey than was possible in the present volume ; and such an intro- ductory essay happened not to be necessary in order to place in position any of the subjects afterwards treated, for even Lamennais belongs (as- Catholics will probably be glad to admit) more to the democratic movement than to the Catholic revival. I have confined this volume to studies in English and French literature. It is my wish on a future occasion to follow up these essays with others treating of sub- jects from the literature and thought of Germany. Upon the whole I hav^ carrl more to understand than b vi Preface. to object ; I Lave tried rather to interpret than to judge. The imperfection of these attempts at criticism I have felt in reading over my proof-sheets probably as vividly as any other person is likely to feel it. Still I have known that they are sincere records of the help which certain great writers have given me, and it has also been a happiness to me to be assured that in the case of some of the writers treated my attempt to interpret has gone — as far as it goes — at least on right lines. For their courteous permission to reprint my 4 contri- butions I thank the Editors of the " Fortnightly Review," the " Contemporary Review," the " Cornhill Magazine," the "Westminster Review," and the "Academy;" and Mr M'Gee, the publisher of " Afternoon Lectures, 1869," X [ ;]YERS1TTZ CjllFOB*^ THE FRENCH REVOLUTION AND LITERATURE. In" recent teaching of English. History something has been done to promote the formation of a true feel- ing of the continuity of our national life by setting aside the arbitrary landmarks furnished by the acces- sion of kings, and by an attempt to space out the history of the people into its larger natural divisions. The landmarks of closing and opening centuries may seem yet more arbitrary or accidental than those placed at the beginning and ending of the reigns of kings. It happens, however, that each of the last three centuries closed with an event, or a series of events, which may be looked upon as marking the commencement of an epoch, — an epoch in the spiritual life of England, if not in her external history, and which is perceived with special distinctness when viewed in relation to literature. In 1588, the galleons of the Spanish Armada were pulled down by the sea-dogs of Drake, or rolled at the mercy of the Orkney wreckers. An immense conscious- ness of power thrilled the nation into quicker life and more daring achievement. Then upon the stage the audacities of Marlowe's genius seemed hardly too extrava- gant, md maturer force lived and acted in lite ve had been lost. The last decade of tha publication of the "Faerie Queen," A 2 The French Revolution and Literature. the " Ecclesiastical Polity/' and the earliest Essays of Bacon; it closed with the trumpet note of Shakspere's "Henry V." still in the air. One hundred years later, 1688, William of Nassau landed at Torbay. Her dominion of the seas England may date from the battle of La Hogue ; the temperate freedom, the security and order guaranteed by the Bill of Rights were as precious a possession, creating a new social and political life, and this again a new literature. It was not an age of ardour, enthusiasm, and ambitious power, but rather a constitutional period, loving compromise, moderation, and good sense, an age of clubs and coffee-houses, of wits and beaux, when poetry was not a prophecy but an accomplishment, when the minor moralities of hoop and furbelow claimed the reformer's attention, when philosophy came into the drawing-rooms, and conversed in irreproachable accent. Again a hundred years, 1789, and events long preparing in France were born into the light of day ; the Deputies, with Mirabeau and Robespierre among them, were assembling at Versailles. Presently came Wordsworth, to gather a relic from the ruins of the Bastille. William Blake w T alked the streets of London, wearing the bonnet rouge as emblem of the arrived millennium. Burke announced the extinction of chivalry, and the advent of the age of sophisters, economists, and calculators;. A little later, and England possessed a poetry for the first time not British so much as European. The Revolution still lightened and thundered through the days of the White Terror and the Holy Alliance, in the v<^ 00 of Byron and Shelley. Such a cataclysm as the French Revolution s The French Revolution and Literature. 3 interrupt the continuity of history, yet in fact, though such a crisis may mark a period, there is no interrup- tion. The "Revolution is but an incident in a move- ment much larger than itself. To some democratic spirits 1789 dates as the year One;Jaefore it lies the chaos of the great monarchies and of feudalism ; then in a moment the demiurge, Revolution, said, " Let there be light," and there was light. By a different class of thinkers the entire eighteenth century, the sceculum rationalisticum, is represented as a page inserted by Satan in God's history of the human race ; the divine Author, having completed his chapter, which contains the story of the witch-burnings and the dragonnades, of Madame de Montespan and of Nell Gwynn, nodded ovei the best of all possible histories, when the author of evil with malicious glee slipped in his chapter of profanity, illuminated with the mocking face of his Voltaire, and the obscene posturings of his Rousseau. The date of each of these theories with respect to the eighteenth century is assuredly gone by. There are symptoms- that we have begun to trace our ancestry without any longer hewing out of its trunk a portion of our family tree. Mr Mark Pattison's essay on " Tendencies of Religious Thought in England, 1688 — 17 50," was one of the earliest studies of eighteenth century thought which can truly be called critical, and it has been fruitful of results. Mr Morley's "Burke," "Rousseau," "Voltaire," and " Diderot," M. Taine's " Les Origines de la France con- temporaine," Mr Hunt's " History of Religious Thought in England," Mr Leslie Stephen's " English Thought in the Eighteenth Century," are evidences that the perk 4 The French Revolution and Literature. of passionate hostility to the sceculum rationalisticum is at an end, and that the work of criticism is begun. We can venture to be just to what lies so far behind us across two generations of men. It is easy to foresee that the injustice to be feared for some time to come will be injustice to the reaction against the eighteenth century. To understand Coleridge is fast becoming more difficult than to understand Hume ; what was the quickening air and light of philosophy to our fathers, changes for us into a theosophic mist, vaguely luminous; in the architecture of the Gothic revival, we are told, may be read " the decay and enfeeblement of reason ;" even our furniture must rationalize itself, and remind us of the defmiteness of design, the moderation and good sense of Chippendale. Looking in a comprehensive way at the litera- ture of the past eighty years, we may discern in its movement four chief tendencies. vV^must not define these too rigidly, or draw hard and fast lines ; nor must we suppose that a human being can be explained and set aside by being classified and labelled. Still it is of use to observe and distinguish, as far as can be done in sincerity of disinterested criticism, the most powerful currents of the literature of our age. ..First, proceeding- out of the last century, the revolutionary and democratic movement arrests our attention. Such names as those of Shelley, Byron, Victor Hugo, George Sand, Heine, Borne, remind us of its importance. Proceeding out of the last century also we perceive the scientific movement, not at first powerfully affecting literature proper, but of late years ever more and more tending to form a new / The French Revolution and Literature. 5 intellectual stratum or bed from which art-products, appropriate to itself, may spring. It^will be felt at once - — — how profoundly the modern imagination is being influenced by the single idea of Evolution ; and it may be noted as a significant incident that within the last year our chief imaginative creator in prose has had to bear the reproach of suffering her genius to undergo what has been styled a " scientific depravation." _Tho { scientific and the democratic movements both contribute j to create the school of thought represented even before/ the Revolution by Bentham, and subsequently by hisi followers, the school of utilitarian ethics and philosophical radicalism. Again, in opposition to the eighteenth cen- tury we observe two movements : — 1. The Mediaeval Revival ; 2. The Transcendental Movement. We have here the large outlines of a map of nine* teenth-centurv literature. In religion the Mediaeval Revival became the Catholic reaction on the Continent, the Oxford movement in England ; in art, it became Romanticism. But Romanticism is a name which covers many and various things. In Scott the interest in the middle ages is part of the aroused historical imagination of modern times ; in Victor Hugo it is part of the reaction against the classical fadeurs of the last century, part of the modern demand for a richer life in art, more variety, keener sensations, greater freedom and animation ; in Uhland it expresses the revival of national life in Germany ; in others of the German romantic poets, it is a thin sentimentalism, united with an impotent desire to restore art by means of a fictive faith. The Transcendental Movement 6 The French Revolution and Literature. opposes the empirical philosophy of the eighteenth century, not like the Mediaeval Revival by a return to a past age, or an appeal to authority, but by an appeal to something higher, more divine, in man, than the senses or the understanding ; it opposes the mechanical deism of Paley and the mechanical atheism of La Mettrie by the discovery of God immanent and omnipresent in nature and in man. The German philosophical systems from Fichte to Hegel belong to this movement ; it appears, modified by other elements, in the teaching of Wordsworth in his earlier years, of Coleridge, and of Carlyle ; in the vague pantheism of Goethe ; and in the lives and writings of that remarkable group of New England reformers, of whom Emerson and Theodore Parker have been the most widely known, and have indeed exercised an European influence. It is important to note that as time went on, the spirit of the Revolution and the genius of transcendental philosophy approached, recognised each other as fellow- workers, or at least as fellow-enthusiasts on man's behalf, and joyously embraced. Even the Catholic re- action was for a time partially drawn into the great wave of democratic feeling ; a strange composition of forces produced that eddy, from which Lamennais escaped to go forward in the pursuit of knowledge and of freedom, and from which others escaped to return to the calm of authority and the certitude of dogma. In the Revolutionary movement and its development, we distinguish two degrees or stages. Although from the first the Revolution was rich in constructive forces, its earlier work was in the main destructive ; the The French Revolution and Literature. 7 new ideals and enthusiasms embodied in the watch- words "liberty, equality, and fraternity," were sought to be realized in the spirit of metaphysical thinkers and theorists ; and the rights of the individual were more considered than the duties of man as a member of society. The Revolutionary movement in its first stage, then, was destructive, metaphysical, individualistic. From about 1830, dates a series of attempts at a revolutionary reconstruction, which should be positive and socialistic in character. How ready a soil the imagination of the time furnished to the germs in the air appears from the remarkable power exerted by the ideas of Saint-Simon upon Heine and Young Germany, by those of Pierre Leroux upon the enthusi- astic genius of George Sand, and by Fourier upon members of the Brook Farm Association. The French Revolution, like every great national movement, both resumed the past and prophesied the future. We must beware of viewing it, in relation to literature, as an isolated phenomenon. There are at least three great influences succeeding one another, and closely connected — all earlier in date than 1830 — which we must distinguish : first, the Critical movement, or Aufkl&rwng, which passed in the latter half of the eighteenth century from England to France, and was inf most active progress from 1760 to 1790; secondly, the 1 Revolution 1790 — 1800 ; thirdly, the wars of the Con- sulate and Empire 1800 — 1815. The literature of the early years of the present century is sometimes treated as if it were dominated by the second of these great movements alone ; in fact, it exhibits the active 8 The French Revolution aud Literature. influence of all three, together with that of many lesser currents of tendency. It is well in considering the career of each important writer of the time, to note the date at which he reached early manhood. One born like William Godwin, in the commencement of the Seven Years' War, would have been exposed to the critical movement before the age of five-and -twenty, and would have advanced towards the Revolution together with that movement. In 1791, he had reached the midpoint of the Scriptural threescore years and ten, when in spite of public calamity which might befall the cause he cherished, he could (had his political idealism not sufficed to sustain him) still bear up and steer right onward, and was little likely to change his creed because some bright hopes became less bright. One born like Wordsworth, some fourteen years after Godwin, could hardly have drunk deep of the pre-Revolu- tion philosophy, unless he were a youth of precocious intellectual power; he would not have come up out of the midst of the eighteenth century with the Revolu- tionary idea ; but in the morning of life it would seem to him, when the splendours of the Revolution first appeared, that he moved in the great morning of the world. Faith in the immense promises of the time would be no mere product of the intellect, but a " pleasant exercise of hope and joy." " Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, But to be young was very heaven." But could such a faith bear the stress which the stern 3^ears brought ? It had been a part of the dawn, and as the sun darkened before the noon, Wordsworth's UNI 1 The French Revolution and Literature. 9 exercise of hope became a desperate hoping against hope, until at last he found abiding sources of light and strength elsewhere than in the European Revolution. One born like Byron, in the year before the meeting of the States- General, would be yet a child when Napoleon stilled the last struggles of Revolution under the sway of military despotism ; he would have endured none of the trial and exhaustion which the early enthusiasts on behalf of democracy underwent, but he would be aware of a great void in the world surrounding him — of faiths that had fallen, of forces that had been spent. There is no environment more fraught with peril to a man framed with great capacities for joy than one which leaves him without a social faith, and throws him back upon his own craving heart and its unsatisfied passions. We may describe the Revolution as consisting of three parts — the intellectual doctrine ; the revolutionary emotions, hopes, hates, fears, ardours, aspirations; and, last, the actual facts of external history. These served as tests to exhibit the elements of which the natures of men exposed to their influence were constituted. If one's mind were nourished only by concrete fact informed by ideas, it might be difficult to view with tolerance a political doctrine which was still disembodied, still expecting to be incarnated in institutions ; such was the case with Burke. If one's intellect were so purely theoretical that concrete facts were to it but illusions, and theories the only realities, then it might be possible to hold the revolutionary doctrine without a question or a doubt through all the failures of Constitutions, the fall of parties, and the ever-intensifying terror ; such was the io The French Revolution and Literature. case with Godwin.* If one possessed an essentially lyrical nature, the basis and substance of which con- sisted of emotion, it might disclose itself in such a fine indiscretion as that of Burns, when he — a British excise- man — despatched his gift of four carronades to the French Convention, with an autograph letter. Real life, the step-mother of poets, reads hard lessons to her impulsive half-children, and Burns, whose carronades were captured at Dover, made piteous profession of his loyalty to the British Constitution, dearest to him of all things next after God, when he pictured to himself his wife and his little ones turned adrift into the world. Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Southey are commonly spoken of together in reference to the Revolutionary movement, as if the relations to it of all three were identical in kind. But, in truth, the test applied by the Revolution detected the differences of their characters quite as much as it revealed the presence of a common element. There was a certain sternness and stoicism at the heart of Wordsworth's enthusiastic joy. His intellect and emotions acted with consentaneity as long as the concrete facts of French history permitted this ; hence his faith was ardent, and his emotions were massive. When, by the pressure of facts, he was driven into alienation from France, his distress was proportionately great and prolonged. In London, Wordsworth heard the greatest philosophical orator of England launch forth his magnificent ridicule against all systems built on abstract rights, — * It should be observed, however, that violent revolutions were, upon principle, condemned by Godwin. The French Revolution and Literattire. 1 1 " The majesty proclaim Of institutes and laws hallowed by time ; Declare the vital power of social ties Endeared by custom, and with high disdain, Exploding upstart Theory, insist Upon the allegiance to which men are born." Nor did Wordsworth see and hear Burke without inspir- ation and gratitude. But it was not any antagonist of the Revolution, it was the Revolution itself, which forced Wordsworth to examine the intellectual basis of his republican faith. As a concrete historical movement the Revolution could not justify itself to his conscience; all the more desperately for a time he clung to republican theories ; but the intellect, divorced from imagination and the vital movements of admiration, hope, and love, served with Wordsworth but to make all faiths dubious, and he underwent in consequence that spiritual crisis, terminating happily in recovery, of which the history is told in " The Prelude." It may be questioned whether Wordsworth, after he had parted with his democratic convictions and earned the name of renegade, did not retain a truer democratic sense of the dignity of manhood than is possessed by writers who deal fluently in the platitudes of fervid Republicanism, and do lip-worship to Humanity, while they exhibit in their temper and their themes all that can render humanity the reverse of worshipful. The great events in France affected Coleridge in a different manner. In the year 1800 he strenuously I opposed, in the Morning Post, the adage fashionable in ministerial circles, " Once a Jacobin always a Jacobin ; " but this he did with no private and personal motive. 1 2 The French Revolution and Literature. He asserts, and the assertion was undoubtedly correct, that he had never been at any period of his life a convert to Jacobinical principles. It was in 1793, after the September massacres and the execution of the King, that Wordsworth wrote his " Letter to the Bishop of LlandafT," in which he haughtily maintains the cause of the Republic. "Before 1793," said Coleridge (and Coleridge was two years younger than Wordsworth), " I clearly saw, and often enough stated in public the horrid delusion, the vile mockery of the whole affair. When some one said in my brother James's presence that I was a Jacobin, he very well observed, ' No ! Samuel is no Jacobin ; he is a hot-headed Moravian !' Indeed, I was in the extreme opposite pole." His feelings and his imagination, Coleridge declares, did not^^gpp^kindled in the general conflagration, " and I confess I should be more inclined to be ashamed than proud of myself if they had. I was a sharer in the general vortex, though my little world described the path of its revolution in an orbit of its own." Coleridge's passionate sympathy was given to France, and when England took up arms against the Republic, he, like Wordsworth, was smitten with grief and shame. It was through a haughty ideality of youth, to which mere pain and blood-shedding seemed worthy of slight regard, that Wordsworth for a time sustained his courage in presence of the dark facts of contemporary history. Coleridge was in possession of a philosophical doctrine, which enabled him to accept the same facts with a certain equanimity. In one of the addresses delivered at Bristol in 1795, and which formed his first prose work, the youthful apostle of the doctrine The French Revolution and Literaha r e. 13 of philosophical necessity (a doctrine which he afterwards so earnestly repudiated) cautions his hearers against the danger of indulgence in the feelings even of virtuous indignation. Thinking patriots have accustomed them- selves " to regard all affairs of man as a process ; they never hurry, and they never pause." Vice is " the effect of error, and the offspring of surrounding circumstances; the object therefore of condolence, not of anger/' Coleridge, at the age of twenty-three, and while the exciting events in France were still in progress, speaks with that judicial tone, that grave benevolence, that ap- parent superiority to the illusions of passion, which often betoken the presence of ardent feelings resolving to justify themselves by a cultivated moderation of tone. And in truth, Coleridge lived and moved more among the abiding#BMBBtf thought, and less in the ebb and flow of the world, than at this time did Wordsworth. To Wordsworth the affairs of man did not seem a " process :" — " I revolved How much the destiny of man had hung Still upon single persons." And in the inexperience of his youth it seemed to him, 1 that possibly through himself, an insignificant stranger, yet " strong in hope, and trained to noble aspirations," with a spirit thoroughly faithful to itself, the needed direction and moving power might be found for distracted France ; if this could not be, if failure were decreed against his hopes and efforts, he was prepared to accept, for the sake of France, life as a sacrifice or the sacrifice of death. Coleridge's dream of pantisocracy had just 14 The French Revolution and Literature. * resolved itself into air, before he delivered his Bristol " Conciones ad Populum." Although in later years it may have been with a smile that he related his dream of a little society, which " in its second generation was to have combined the innocence of the patriarchal age with the knowledge and genuine refinements of European culture," at the time the designed experiment of human perfectibility was the object of earnest thought and hope. Wordsworth never regretted that his youth was one of enthusiastic ardour, of impassioned faith, although his faith and ardour subsequently took upon themselves a new and more spiritual body. And Coleridge did not find his early self worthy of that hard ridicule, which manhood too often bestows upon a youth which possesses the appropriate beauty and virtue of youth ; if after- wards he smiled, the smile was like that of one who, sound and sweet in heart, sees from the calm elevation of later years the joys and fears of boy and girl lovers. " Strange fancies, and as vain as strange ! yet to the 'ntense interest and impassioned zeal, which called forth and strained every faculty of my intellect for the organization and defence of this scheme, I owe much of what I at present possess, my clearest insight into the nature of individual man, and my most comprehensive views of his social relations, of the true uses of trade and commerce, and how far wealth and relative power of nations promote and impede their welfare and inher- ent strength." That there was a real and deep con- tinuity in the development of Coleridge's political and religious opinion may be denied by party spirit ; by disinterested criticism H cannp*- fail to be recognized. The French Revolution and Literature. 15 While Wordsworth, rendered grave by the September massacres, remained at Blois, and Coleridge perhaps was planning his College escapade, by which a train of gunpowder was to inscribe upon the singed grass of the lawns of St John's and Trinity the words Liberty and Equality, a singular conjunction took place between the most soaring spirit among the children of Revolution, and her earthiest and ugliest urchin, — William Blake became the saviour of Tom Paine. Mr Gilchrist has related how in the quaint upper room over bookseller Johnson's little shop, met the apostles and prophets of the eighteenth-century evangel, — Dr Price and Dr Priestley, William Godwin, whom Blake liked little, stoical Holcroft, Mary Wollstonecraft, and the irascible Fuseli, false prophet of high art. The practical good sense and tact of the visionary Blake saved Paine from an English prison, and sent that " rebellious needleman," elected representative by the Pas de Calais, to take his seat in the Convention. In Blake's enormous mythology the genius of Revolution was an honoured divinity. Its historical apparition, how- ever, although Blake hailed that apparition with en- thusiasm, was less to him than its eternal essence, its " spiritual form." From a rich feeling for concrete fact like that possessed by Burke, the mind of Blake was of course as remote as was that of Godwin ; but while the Revolution gave visible shape for Godwin to intellectual formulae, apparent through the crimes and evil passions of men, it was in Blake's conception a new- born joy, incarnating an eternal reality of the imagina- tion. A joy, and also a terror, sprung from the marriage 1 6 The French Revolution and Literature. of heaven and hell, of reason and desire. Reason, self- restraint, law, duty, apart from energy and desire, were in Blake's eyes deadening impositions of Urizen, the evil god of prohibition, and they found their earthly repre- sentatives in prisons and in churches. The Lord, in " Faust," recognizes the need, for man's uses, of Mephistopheles, the spirit of negation. But with Blake the devil, as he is called by the adverse party, is as truly god as the other claimant of that name, or, in plain speech, impulse, desire, freedom, are as great and sacred as reason, law, restraint. Man, unparcelled into body and spirit, is all holy, and the supreme of things ; the unpardonable sin is to denaturalize or extinguish desire, to slay a living joy. In truth Blake went astray in only a single particular, ■ — in being born on this earth. His right place was that of minister to the archangels of Goethe's Pro- logue in Heaven, to whom love is its own law, and who gather strength and beatitude from the sight of the Lord : " Das Werdende, das ewig wirkt und lebt, Umfass' euch mit der Liebe holden Schranken." But precisely because Blake could not ever lose what he conceived to be the essence of the Revolution, which lived in him as part of his purest self, he could the more easily detach himself from the historical movement. Less able to endure the harshness of the evil days than was Wordsworth in his haughty ideality, Blake, after the September massacres, tore off his cockade, and wore his bonnet rouge no more. At a happier moment, in 1790, appeared at the end of " The Marriage of Heaven The French Revolution and Literature. ij and Hell," Blake's " Song of Liberty." Freedom is born from the womb of the " Eternal Female," the mother force of the spirit of man ; it is a marvellous babe, a terror to the world with its fiery limbs and naming hair ; a prophetic thrill runs through the earth, " shadows of prophecy shiver along by the lakes and the rivers;" alarm and hatred and jealousy are roused to crush the new-born terror ; the gloomy King who hates liberty leads his starry hosts through the wilder- ness, and promulgates his ten commands ; but the son of fire in his eastern cloud " stamps the stony law to dust, . . . crying, ' Empire is no more ! and now the lion and the wolf shall cease.'" The song closes with a chorus proclaiming the triumph of gratified desire : " For everything that lives is holy." To the end, as Mr Gilchrist tells us, Blake always avowed himself a " Liberty Boy." An antinomian tendency is a character- istic common to many mystics ; it is rarely that the antinomianism is so pure and childlike, yet so impas- sioned, as it was in the case of Blake. The eighteenth century closed with moral exhaustion, / enthusiasms burnt to ashes, the melancholy of discovered illusions, and the remorse and yearning that follow upon a supreme work of destruction. To continue an ardent Republican during the experiences of the years from 1790 to 1800, a man must needs have been either singularly idealistic, or of a very stoical temper. " In long-continuing revolutions," wrote De Tocqueville, "men are morally ruined less by the faults and the crimes that they commit in the heat of passion or of their political convictions, than by the contempt that in the end they B 18 The French Revolution and Literature. » acquire for the very convictions and passions that moved them ; when wearied, disenchanted, and undeceived, they turn against themselves, and consider their hopes as having been childish — their enthusiasm, and, above all, their devotion, absurd. None can conceive how often the mainspring of even the strongest minds is broken by such a catastrophe. . . . It is difficult to imagine . . the extreme fatigue, apathy, indifference, or, rather, contempt, for politics into which a long, terrible, and barren struggle had thrown men's minds." To escape from such fatigue and ennui, Paris for a time abandoned itself to reckless pleasure. " The amusements in Paris," says a contem- porary, " are now not interrupted for a single instant, either by the terrible events that take place, or by the fear of future calamities. The theatres and public places were never so crowded. At Tivoli, you hear it said that things will soon be worse than ever : on appelle la Patrie la Patraque,* and through it all we dance." " I do not find in history," writes De Tocqueville again, " a single event that contributed more to the well-being of future generations, or more entirely demoralized the generation that brought it to pass." f There was one spirit, however, who, pipe as they might, would not dance. In 1799, appeared the "Reveries" of Senancour, which preceded his " Obermann," and foretold a literature — some of it of a much more recent j a te — inspired by the sentiment of the void, the barren sadness, the sterility of life. The loss of faith within, * Patraque, an old worn-out machine. + "France before the Consulate," in De Tocqueville's Memoir and Remains, vol. i. pp. 272—276. See also the close of Edgar Quinet'a History of the Revolution. The French Revolution and Literature, 19 the ruins of a world without, measureless desire awakened by the sense that the old boundaries were gone, and a new destiny was opening for the spirit of man, impotence to satisfy that desire, no wing to explore the new horizons — such was the malady of Obermann. And he sought healing beneath the glacier and the unchanging Alpine snows. To chill his too feverish heart, to calm the rest- less pulse, to numb the pain of being, was the demand of his nature. Not change, not the play and colour of life, not the song and the dance, but resignation, solitude, silence, the white field of snow, a permanency of accepted grief — " I turn thy leaves : I feel their breath. Once more upon me roll ; That air of languor, cold, and death Which brooded o'er thy soul. * # # * " Though here a mountain murmur swells Of many a dark-bough'd pine, Though, as you read, you hear the bells Of the high pasturing kine — " Yet, through the hum of torrent lone, And brooding mountain bee, There sobs I know not what groundtone Of human agony." In this literature of despair two characteristics especially strike the reader — a conception of the great- ness of ideal man, and of his boundless capacity for pleasure and for pain ; and, with this, a sense of the pettiness and sterility of the actual life of man. Despair with the writers of the early part of the century is not, as with Schopenhauer and Hartmann, a theory or doctrine, with its metaphysic of pessimism, and its benevolent 20 The French Revolution and Literature. ethics of pessimism ; it has no social purpose ; it is an individual experience, while at the same time it is la onaladie du siecle. It is negative and dissolving, where- as the pessimism of our own day aspires to be con- structive, and to furnish a creed and a rule of life. In Obermann, to the common sadness of the time is added the suffering- which arises from his individual feeble- ness. Even if the cup of life were brimming with joy, Obermann could hardly lift the cup to his lips. It was not until a second revolution had passed over France, and the muttering of renewed thunder was again in the air, that Senancour found that deliverance from desire, that permanency of calm, which he bad sought. He found them, not beneath the grey " cone of Jaman " and the "blue profound," but in the cemetery at Sevres, where they engraved upon the tombstone words of his choice from his " Libres Meditations " — Eternite, deviens inon asyle ! Sainte-Beuve has named Obermann the genuine Rene. Some years before Coleridge planned his pantisocracy, and a little later than the time when William Blake was making his inquisition into the n^stery of evil, in his "Marriage of Heaven and Hell," and was chanting his Song of Liberty. Chateaubriand set foot on the soil of the New World. For a while, remote from the civil strife, he wandered in the virginal solitudes, exhaling his soul in reverie, or making acquaintance with the noble savage, — not precisely the noble savage of Rousseau, but one who had appreciated the beauties of a sentimental Christianity, and united a kind of Active innocency of nature with the emotional refinements and curiosities of The French Revolution and Literature, 21 civilization. Rousseau had found an eloquent pupil in the founder of nineteenth century literature in France, but in place of the intensity and diseased ardour of Rousseau, which made him an initiator, we find in Chateaubriand a dissolving spirit of reverie, a measure- less sigh of regret, a background of melancholy horizons, washed in for their artistic effect. After the clear and hard thinking of the eighteenth century, came the day- dream of the sentimentalist ; after the advance, a pause ; after energy, lassitude; after hope, recollection. Were Catholicism and feudalism fallen, and in ruins ? De Maistre, " the Catholic Hobbes of the Revolution," would come and rebuild the Bastille for the human spirit ; Chateaubriand, " poet-laureate of Christianity," would come to sit upon the ruins and sing. The faith of Chateaubriand, as far as he possessed a faith, was that of the eighteenth century, — he was a deist : but his sentiment belongs to the nineteenth cen- tury. A dying mother had grieved over his lack of Christian belief; the beauties of Christianity supplied charming themes for tender rhetoric ; in fine, there was a vacancy for a laureate, and he would wear the poetic wreath. The historical sentiment for Christianity in Chateaubriand may, perhaps, indicate an advance from the school of evidential writers in England, who were so busily engaged for half a century in proving that the apostles were neither enthusiasts nor impostors ; but Chateaubriand's historical sentiment is not robust, a martyr interests him as a moonlight ruin might, very charming things may be said about each of them. Nor did he possess a political any more than a religious faith ; 22 The French Revolution and Literature. what he really represents is the void left by the loss of faiths. " Je me suis toujours etonne," wrote Chateau- briand of his contemporary Chamfort, " qu'un homme qui avait tant de connaissance des hommes, eut pu dpouser si chaudement une cause quelconque." The sadness of Rene' is not a strenuous pain ; it is vague and veiled, the romanticism of sorrow, a musical reverie with no definite theme, a grief not uniform, grey, monotonous, but one shot through with a play of shifting colours. Senti- mentalism is the feminine of cynicism ; the genius of Chateaubriand may be described as the feminine cor- relative of the genius of Byron. Chateaubriand, in a passage inspired by characteristic vanity, draws a parallel between himself and Byron, each the founder of a new literature, each of noble rank, and he somewhat querulously complains that the English poet nowhere makes due acknowledgment of obligations to his French predecessor. But " Childe Harold ' is in every way the offspring of a more masculine imagina- tion than "Rene." Although its central figure has been taken for a representative of the English jeunesse doree, few young English aristocrats, it may be suspected, could have felt with Childe Harold the largeness of European interests, in the past and in the present, in the material and in the moral orders. As we read the poem we assist at the rise and fall of empires, in the court, the camp, the council-chamber. Under the veil of superficial cynicism there appears in " Childe Harold " a robust enthusiasm for what is great, beautiful, and heroic in European history ; in no way of mere senti- mental reverie, but with a strong ardour of imagination, The French Revolution a7id Liter atiwe. 23 the glories of former ages live again in the verse of Byron, and connect themselves with the life of his own day. The monuments of old renown, the memorials of patriot, of warrior, of poet, — Dante, " the starry Galileo," Ariosto, Rousseau, Voltaire, the castles of the Rhine, the cathedrals of Italy, the Apollo, the Laocoon, are none of them forgotten or disregarded. The sated voluptuary displays a vigorous delight in the presence or the recollection of each of these. Byron's pleasure in nature, in art, in human character, in the memorials of history, has indeed nothing in it subtle or exquisite ; but he sees the large features of things, reads off their obvious significance, and receives from them an ample though not an exquisite emotion. There is in " Childe Harold" a historical sense, not scientific, and applying itself only to an obtrusive class of facts, yet real and vital ; and while the poem deals so much with the past, it is in spirit essentially modern. If Childe Harold devours all the material of enjoyment which nature and society, the present and the past, afford, still his heart remains craving and unsatisfied. Obermann had withdrawn from the world, unable to sustain its tumults and agitations. Rene' had spent his powers in a waste of imagination, in desire apart from action, in the luxury of self-observing tender emotion, Childe Harold flings himself on life, and when he falls back defeated of joy, gathers up his force, wave-like, to fling himself upon life again. The ethical ideal of the eighteenth century had represented as the most precious elements of human character a wise temperance, moder- ated desires, a cheerful resignation, a tolerant and pliant 24 The French Revolution and Literature. temper, good sense ; for one who set before him such an ideal- no great disenchantment or disillusion was possible. " Never elated while one man's oppress'd Never dejected while another's bless'd ; " such is the equable frame of mind that Pope commends. And when the ardour of religious desire seizes upon us what, according to Johnson, should be our prayer ? " Yet when the sense of sacred presence fires, And strong devotion to the skies aspires, Pour forth thy fervours for a healthful mind, Obedient passions, and a will resign'd." " Je sens en moi l'innni," exclaimed Napoleon, maker of our century's epics in the world of action, himself so great, so petty, the conqueror of the Pyramids, the captive of St. Helena. "Je sens en moi l'infini," exclaimed also Byron, and this infinite of egoism left him in the end like Napoleon, defeated and defrauded, narrowed into the bounds of a solitary, small, and sterile island in the great ocean of human existence — or would have left him so, had not Greece summoned him and Missolonghi set him free. Byron has been spoken of as the representative poet of revolution, and the fact that in his hands English poetry became for the first time European poetry, — interesting in Weimar, in Florence, in Paris, hardly less than in London, — is evidence that Byron possesses more + -han a national significance. The positive dogmas, how- ever, of the French Revolution occupy a small place in Byron's poetry. In its political results the Revolution seemed to him a huge failure ; yet it impressed hir imagination as so w r onderful a phenomenon, a manifesta- The French Revolution and Literature. 25 tion of popular power so striking and so new, that all promises for the future became through it credible. Only ruins indeed remained, ruins wherewith to build anew dungeons and thrones ; yet such cannot be the order of things for ever : " But this will not endure nor be endured ! Mankind have felt their strength, and made it felt." And so Byron at once believed and doubted the gospel jof Revolution. What he absolutely disbelieved was the gospel of the Holy Alliance. He profoundly expressed the feeling of the moral void, and the failure of all attempts to fill that void by the infinite of egoism, by pleasure, by passion, by the ambition of the imagination ; and he illustrated through all changes of circumstances and temper, one thing constantly — a disdain of checks, a force of reckless individualism, which formed part of the revolutionary spirit. This it is which gives unity to the mixed and otherwise incoherent elements of which Byron was compounded. An English noble, proud of his rank, yet an enemy to caste ; a fighter in the ranks of the children of light, yet not without a strong touch of the Philistine in him ; corrupted by the evil days of the Regency and hating their corruption ; a scoffer at orthodoxy, yet never delivered from a half-faith in the popular theology of England ; a leader of the Romantic movement, yet a worshipper of the poetry of Pope ; mean and generous, posing himself for admiration, yet possess- ing at bottom a sincerity of his own ; an Apollo placed upon the limping limb of a Vulcan. Care for his own moral being was not at any time that which could have given direction and coherence to 26 The French Revolution and Literature. the nature of Byron ; had he been fortunate enough to come under the influence of some public or national cause, which would have engaged his deepest feelings, aroused his imagination, and given scope for the deploy- ing of the forces of his will, then perhaps, no power of our century would have been comparable to Byron. But he found himself among spectral faiths, and the ghosts of heroic causes, while the coarse energies and vulgar enjoy- ments of the jeunesse doree, the mohawks of the Regency, were at least real and living. And so his nature suf- fered, not indeed entire disintegration and death, but inward division; his nobler self protested and uttered defiance, his baser self answered with ironical laughter; at length in "Don Juan," the mocking voices envelop and almost reduce to silence the voice of the better spirit ; then came the final protest and defiance of his higher nature : — " The sword, the banner, and the field, Glory and Greece, around we see ! The Spartan, borne upon his shield, Was not more free ; " and then, the divine freedom of death. The fact that much of Byron's work was wrought from vulgar materials made it the more readily accepted in his own day. If jarring forces strove in Byron, they strove also in the world around him. One thing he constantly expresses — the individualism of the earlier Revolutionary epoch, and the emptiness and sterility of the life which is merely individual and not social. *' r * See, in Life and Writings of Mazzini, vol. vi., an essay on " Byron and Goethe," admirable in its treatment of Byron, and presenting with great earnestness a one-sided view of Goethe. The French Revolution and Literature. 27 Mr Matthew Arnold, who recognizes the great pro- ductive power of Byron, inquires why the brilliant poetical movement of Byron's time did not sustain itself, and bore so little fruit ; and his answer is, because it was not nourished by the best ideas ; it did not know enough ; no great critical movement lay behind it. Mr Arnold's view may be right, and yet it is possible to inquire too curiously into these things ; the work of Byron could perhaps only be done in Byron's way. " I very much doubt," said Goethe's famulus, Eckermann, "whether a decided gain for pure human culture is to be derived from Byron's writings." Goethe replied, as Faust might have done to Wagner, " There I must con- tradict you ; the audacity and grandeur of Byron must certainly tend towards culture. We should take care not to be always looking for it in the decidedly pure and moral." Nor, it may be added, in the decidedly intellectual and scientific. " Everything that is great," went on Goethe, " promotes cultivation as soon as we are aware of it." Byron did much to free, arouse, dilate the emotional life of the nineteenth centurv. This has been his chief work, and it is doubtful whether the work would have been accomplished more effectively had Byron emerged from a matrix of philosophy and criticism. The Revolution, as it realized itself in France from 1789 to 1799, was in fact a series of revolutions. The Constituent, the Legislative, the Convention, the Directory, had each its season ; Girondins, Dantonists, Robespierre and Saint-Just, the Thermidoriens, followed one another like fierce waves, revolution rolling in upon revolution. " In studying that portion of the European 28 The French Revolution and Literature. movement," writes Mr John Morley, " which burst forth into flame in France between the fall of the Bastille and those fatal days of Vende'miaire, Fructidor, Flore'al, Brumaire, in which the explosion came convulsively to its end, we seem to see a microcosm of the Byronic epos. The succession of moods is identical. Overthrow, rage, material energy, crime, profound melancholy, half-cynical dejection. The Revolution was the battle of will against the social forces of a dozen centuries." It may be that, in accordance with this view, which has a completeness and definiteness attractive to the mind of a theoretic literary critic, Byron is the truest representative in our literature of the Revolution as a realized historical series /of events. Certainly the rer^ejenta^e^of jihe Rev &lu- Ition in its pure ideal is not Byron but Shelley. No writer can have fewer affinities to the eighteenth century than Shelley, considered as an artist. Byron may have had some remote kinship with the classical school ; his admiration for Pope may have been something more than a protest of his good sense against his passion and his pride, something more than an admission that he dis- trusted his own craving heart, felt weary of the pain of a spirit divided between enthusiasm and irony, and looked at times longingly towards the via "media of moderated and justified desires, unambitious reason, and tranquil benevolence — qualities which, if Pope did not possess, he yet poetically recommends. Shelley assuredly derives nothing as an artist from the eighteenth century, except from such parts of it as run on and ) connect themselves with nineteenth century art — such, I X for example, as Rousseau's feeling for nature, his senti- ( The French Revolution and Literature. 29 mental ardour, and the romantic horrors of Mrs Rad- cliffe. But the intellectual basis or background of Shelley's earlier poetry belongs, on the political side wholly, and in large part upon the metaphysical side, to the Aufkldrung, the critical movement which pre- ceded the Revolution. Shelley came in a time of reaction ; but his imagina- tive motives lay less in events than in ideas, and, unlike Byron, he remained in his inner spirit wholly unaffected for evil by the reaction. No Girondin in early Revolu- tion days could possess a more unqualified faith in the Revolution than did the young English poet in the days of the Regency. He saw indeed an enormous antagon- ism of evil set over against good ; but his white flame of devotion, to what seemed to him the sacred cause, was thereby only quickened and intensified. Whether it be an indication of intellectual narrowness and weak- ness, or rather of the martyr and saint-like strength, no touch of that cynicism which made so large a part of Byron's complex mode of feeling came to trouble the simplicity, or divide the energy of Shelley's soul. De Tocqueville wrote a chapter to show how the French Revolution, disregarding territorial boundaries, and \iewing man as man, proceeded alone among political movements in the manner of religious revolutions, and 'extended itself by preaching and propagandism. This aspect of the Revolution in especial is apparent in both the writings of Shelley and his youthful apostleship, particularly during his mission to Ireland. Perhaps one may discover something more heroic in Byron's sacrifice of self on behalf of a people from whom he expected no 30 The French Revolution and Literature, miracle of virtue, and of patriots whom he half despised, than in Shelley's preparedness for surrender for the whole human race about to be suddenly enfranchised and transfigured ; and it is true that there is an absence of sanity and adult force in Shelley's revolutionary propagandism ; but Byron's sacrifice was not unmingled with motives of egoism, and the life he offered up was one worn with excess, and weary through satiety. There is an intellectual relationship between Shelley and Godwin, closer and more important than their subsequent family connexion through Shelley's second marriage. Godwin, as Mr Leslie Stephen has noticed, " more than any English thinker, resembles those French theorists who represented the early revolutionary im- pulse." " His opinions were rooted too deeply in abstract speculations to be affected by any storms raging in the region of concrete phenomena. . . . He remained a Republican Abdiel throughout the long dark winter of reaction." It may safely be anirmed_Jhat everyjeading idea in S helley 's ea rlier w ritings, can be paralleled by a doctrine taught in Godwin's " Political Justice." Both Godwin and Shelley, in common with the century from which sprang their beliefs, were deficje^t__ia_th^-his- torical sense. " I am determined to apply myself," Sh^ney^writes, " to a study that is hateful and disgust- ing to my very soul. ... I mean that record of crimes and miseries, history." And again, in a letter to Godwin, " I am unfortunately little skilled in English history, and the interest which it excites in me is so feeble, that I find it a duty to attain merely to that general knowledge of it which is indispensable." And The French Revolution and Literature. 31 again very beautifully and characteristically Shelley writes to another correspondent, "Facts are not what we want to know in poetry, in history, in the lives of individual men, in satire, or panegyric. They are the mere divisions, the arbitrary points on which we hang, and to which we refer those delicate and evanescent hues of mind, which language delights and instructs us in precise proportion as it expresses." Byron declares that from the moment he could read, his grand passion was history, and there will be found in his Life by Moore a remarkable extract from a memorandum book of 1807, in which Byron sets down a list of the historical writers whose works he had perused ; the list occupies more than two pages, and includes histories of England, Scotland, Ireland, Rome, Greece, France, Spain, Portu- gal, Turkey, Russia, Sweden, Prussia, Germany, Italy, Hindostan, America."* "The greater part of these," Byron adds, "I perused before the age of fifteen." Shelley was about to reform the world, but empirical knowledge, experience, was not needed for the task ; the gross stuff of society was to be penetrated by the purify- ing flame of an idea, and all its grossness was to be burnt away. Godwin (again I quote from Mr Leslie Stephen) 1 "represents the tendency of the revolutionary school towards the deification of the pure intellect ; r . . 'sound reasoning and truth, when adequately com- municated, must alway be victorious over error ; sound * The " List of Books read by Shelley and Mary in 1817 " (Shelley Memorials, end of chap, vii.) supplies materials for an interesting contrast. 32 The French Revolution and Literature, reasoning and truth are capable of being so com- municated ; truth is omnipotent ; the vices and moral weaknesses of men are not invincible ; man is per- fectible, or in other words, susceptible of perpetual improvement." What is this but the Revolt of Islam put into intellectual formulae ? In Shelley's poem, indeed, written at a time when the Revolution seemed to have temporarily failed, and when the forces of reaction were strong, the power of error is more justly estimated ; yet if evil should triumph, it can be but for a season ; the moment must arrive, when before the breath of some pure prophet or prophetess, all the piled - up wrongs of the earth must go down and dissolve. In the " Prometheus " ages must pass away before the tyrant falls, and the deliverer is unbound ; but the day of rejoicing is certain, even if it be far off, and in the end it will come with sudden glory. " The worst of criminals might be reformed by reasoning" — such was Godwin's happy conviction. Shelley differs only as a poet must differ from a philosopher — he assigns a larger share in such possible reformation to the emotions, and the action upon the heart of ideals of justice and charity. " To hate a murderer is as un- reasonable as to hate his weapon " — so thought Godwin ; and Shelley poetizes the doctrine when Laon bids the tyrant Othman go free. To account for the prevalence of error, Godwin "sets up a dark power of imposture which fights and has hitherto fought with singular success, against the power of truth. . . . Kings and priests represent the incarnation of evil." The Zeus by whose order Prometheus is chained to the rock is this The French Revolution ana Literature. 33 dark Power of imposture, he is also named the Anarch Custom ; it is he who has authorized the superstitions and the tyrannies of the world. " We can scarcely hesitate," wrote Godwin, "to conclude universally that law is an institution of the most pernicious tendency." And with Shelley law is everywhere at odds with love, and in a reign of love it must at last disappear. As to the marriage bond, Godwin is merely uncertain whether the future unions of the sexes will be by promiscuous intercourse, or alliances terminable at the pleasure of either party. * Shelley exhibits in his original " Laon and Cythna," and his " Rosalind and Helen," the beauty of free love, and the miseries and degrading slavery of unions where no love exists or which are protracted after love has ceased. A ll the illusions of th e Revolu-^ 1 tion, many of them generous illusions, — perfectibility, disregard of tradition and inheritance, the contras between a benevolent Nature and the selfishness Society,*!* — are to be found in full vigour in Shelle Also all that was admirable and noble, all that was of a constructive character in the Revolution is to be found — its enthusiasm of humanity, its passion for justice, its recognition of a moral element in politics,\ its sentiment of the brotherhood of men. ) It was an unfortunate circumstance that the move-' ment party in England, and England's poets of progress^ , remained separated by a great gulf. The questioning spirit in English thought during the early part of the * Leslie Stephen : English Thought in the Eighteenth Century, vol. a. p. 275. + On this point Shelley in later years learned to correct his erroi. C n 4 The French Revolution and Literatui'e. present century — Jeremy Bentham — was (perhaps not excepting Hobbes) the hardest-headed of all questioniDg spirits, and his followers cut ofT the right hand of sensibility and put out the right eye of imagination, if by any means they might enter into the heaven of Utilitarianism, and have share in the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Mr Mill described in his Autobiography the spirit which animated the first propagators of Philosophic Radicalism. On their banner was inscribed a strange device — the population principle of Malthus. In politics they were possessed by " an almost unbounded confidence in the efficacy of two things, representative government and complete freedom of' discussion." Aristocratic rule was the object of their sternest disapprobation ; " an established Church or corporation of priests, as being by position the great depravers of religion, and interested in opposing the progress of the human mind," was, next after aristocracy, the most detestable of things. " Some of us," Mr Mill goes on, "for a time really hoped and aspired to be a 'school.' The French pi hilosc yokes of the eighteenth century were the examples we sought to imitate." Here were several particulars offering points of con- nexion with such poetry as that of Shelley, and Mr Mill was himself endowed with a fine feeling for literature. But something was wanting. " My zeal," says Mr Mill, " was, as yet, little else, at that period of my life, than zeal for speculative opinions. It had not its root in genuine benevolence or sympathy with mankind, though these qualities held their due place in my ethical standard. Nor was it connected with any high enthusi- The French Revolution and Literature. 35 asm for ideal nobleness. Yet of this feeling I was imaginatively very susceptible ; but there was at that time an intermission of its natural aliment, poetical culture, while there was a superabundance of the discipline antagonistic to it, that of mere logic and analysis." All poetry had been pronounced by Bentham to be misrepresentation. Among the liberals of that time, it was the spiritual liberals, Maurice and Sterling, with others — disciples of Coleridge — who best appreci- ated the uses of the imagination and the " understanding heart." No one who has read Mr Mill's Autobiography > can forget the remarkable chapter in which he describes the spiritual dryness and dejection in which his habit of analysis and his unqualified Benthamism for a time resulted,, nor how, in large measure through the influence of poetry — the poetry of Wordsworth, — he recovered his sanity and his energy of will. Afterwards, while still highly estimating Wordsworth's poetry, he came to understand Shelley, and assigned to him an unique place among English poets, as possessor of the artistic temperament in its purest, typical form. Th &J&H igcr m jopjxy of JjjiglajicLlir . ga ii rind e n d ed withJByron and Shel ley^_While the Revolution of 1830 proved that the spirit of 1789 was still living and acting on the Continent of Europe, while that move- ment assisted in giving a new direction to the rising Romantic school in France, and was hailed by Heine with pyrotechnic display of delighted epigrams, England, the weary Titan, was considering her corn laws and her Reform Bill. In France, new government, new litera- tures, new religions, new political Utopias, Saint-Simon, 36 The French Revolution arid Literature. and " rehabilitation of the flesh " through socialism. In Germany, the school of junge Deutschland, with its literary Utopias, and rehabilitation of the flesh through joyous art. In England, severed by her positive national character from the movement on the Continent, quite a different sustenance of the flesh interested men, — namely sustenance by corn. On all sides, however, after the reverie and vague idealizing of the early part of the century, a more positive and practical tendency showed itself. A new stadium in the advance of the revolu- tionary idea commenced, and other influences, which had been silently gathering strength, now^ for the first time, came into vital relations with literature. With many readers of poetry at the present day, the names of Enoch Wray and Miles Gordon stir no fibre of imaginative sensibility; yet they are names of poetic worth. It has been a disadvantage to Ebenezer Elliott as a poet — though he would, perhaps, himself have esteemed it his chief honour as a man — that he should be remembered as the Corn-Law Rhymer. At a time when poets love before all else to regard themselves as artists, and inscribe upon their quaint banner of dis- coloured say or silk the words " Art for art," the poet who uplifts a banner — big and boisterous — with the motto in plain English letters " Bread for the worker " must take his chance of being set down as unregenerate, a banner-bearer of the host of the Philistines. Much that Elliott wrote certainly lias no portion in the calm eternity of art, is not enshrined in any temple of those islands " Which bards in fealty to Apollo hold." The French Revolution and Literature. 37 Worthy in its kind, it belongs rather to that part of literature which, having a temporary purpose, and having accomplished that purpose, can resolvedly ac- cept oblivion. It serves its generation, and falls on sleep. Prose is perhaps a more appropriate vehicle than verse for work of this occasional kind, and whereas poetry which becomes rhetoric degrades from its true function, the impassioned argument of a poet who chooses prose as his means of expression has in it some- thing of light shining through the veil from his face to whom God speaks " as a man speak eth unto his friend." It was through a wise instinct or a high resolve that Milton remained silent as a poet while he was pouring forth in rapid succession his terrible pamphlets in de- fence of ecclesiastical, civil, and domestic liberty. There is, indeed, a kind of art which is both for the moment and for all time, but then the moment must be one charged with some special, some infinite, significance. And if a song is to be at all a sword, it must be of finer temper than even the finest Sheffield cutlery ; the sword must be a living thing, like the angelic sword of flame which turned every way. We may congratulate our- selves that corn-duties have ceased, and that the ten- pound householder obtained his vote, but Peterloo, and the Repeal, and the Reform Bill of 1832 are not among the divine Ideas. Pure artist, as we at the present time are inclined to conceive the artist, Ebenezer Elliott never was. He could at no time be insensible to the pressure of practi- cal, material needs around him ; if he ever escaped into the presence of perfect beauty, it was as the artisan i 38 The French Revolution ci7id Literature. takes his Sunday ramble, to restore him for the toil of the laborious hours. He could be anything sooner than what one of our living poets professes himself, " the idle singer of an empty day." He would in his best moment have been indifferent to those aromatic stings and scents, " Corrompus, riehes et triomphants, Ayant l'expansion des choses infinies," that mount to our brain and make it giddy as we lean over the exquisite little phials which recent French poets have filled for our seduction with strange and secret compounds. He would have failed to discern the aesthetic necessity of some of our cherished curiosities of style ; it may be cfoubted whether the incantation of the most musical, most meaningless refrain would have lulled to sleep his open-eyed sense of common fact ; he would frankly have preferred for imaginative study a vigorous tramp upon an English highway to the slenderest-bodied mediaeval maiden, possessing the tenderest mediaeval name, and seen in the subtlest of side-lights. Yet there was some pith and substance in Ebenezer Elliott ; and it might be a fair question of de- bate with a modern disciple of the philosophy of Aris- tippus whether there were not obtainable a moment of excitement more exquisite from contemplating so re- markable a figure as that of Elliott's Peasant Patriarch than from self-abandonment to the glories of a tazza of Gubbio, or to the grace of a cabinet by Chippendale. It is, also, perhaps unfortunate for Elliott's fame in the century of revolution that, as a poet dealing with politics, his Radicalism was of an essentially English The French Revolution and Literature. 39 type. He claimed for the people not an ideal Republic, not Equality, not even Liberty as a new divinity for universal worship, not anything supposed eternal or infinite ; his demand was for something known, definite, tangible, material — a cheap loaf of bread. Had he exhaled his ardour in apostrophes to Freedom, and Revolution, and Humanity, he might still quicken our spirits with the wine of vague enthusiasm ; as it is, his political poetry has only helped to fill the mouths of the hungry with food. Yet English working men honoured his English devotion to their cause, and, when they raised his statue in their city, Landor cast as it were in bronze a poem, medallion-like, which exhibits in a group with the Elliott of Gibraltar and the Eliot who prepared the Commonwealth, the third Elliott — also glorious — who helped to abolish the tax on bread. Readers of Mr Matthew Arnold's Essays in Criticism will remember how the critic's scourge of small cords is laid with a light and sure hand on Mr Roebuck's shoulders as the reward for that vigorous statesman's talk to the Sheffield cutlers about " our unrivalled happiness." " I ask you," said Mr Roebuck, " whether the world over, or in past history, there is anything like it ? Nothing. I pray that our unrivalled happiness may last." Writing at a date before the repeal of the Corn Laws, it is assuredly not our unrivalled happiness which finds reflection in the Sheffield singer's verse. Its spirit is rather that of courageous sadness ; indignation made not a few of the verses — indignation which is that of a sweet, hearty nature hating to be perforce turned bitter. The side of Elliott's genius which is most remote from 40 The French Revolution and Literature. reality, which loved to be. romantic, was his less true self, and in his romantic poems there is unquestionably a note of spuriousness. In his passionate studies of real life we find the real man — ardent, affectionate, earnest, courageous, tender, sad, and conquering sadness by virtue of inextinguishable hope. When we have laid aside the two considerable volumes which contain his poetical works, and ask our- selves what remains with us, what shall we carry forward, and not part with, the answer is, Some figures taken from actual English life — figures of rare dignity or true pathetic power, and with these the atmosphere, the rugged earth, the voices of swift, wild streams, the fresh- ness of fair, wild flowers, and all else that makes up the external nature of Elliott's district in the West Riding of Yorkshire. There is something to English eyes dearer in the prosaic ploughmen and carters of Bewick's woodcuts, or the ungainly little figures of sailors and washerwomen in Turner's English landscapes, than in the most romantic of Italian banditti. But the chief personages of Elliott's best poems have claims upon our regard of a higher kind — they are those figures of exceptional grandeur or pathetic beauty which humble life in English city and village now and then affords. Enoch Wray will not be forgotten by one who has set eyes upon him for a single time on high-way or hill-side — the massive frame, still unbowed after its hundred years, the sightless eyes, the wind-blown venerable hair, the heart bearing its memories of grief and wrong. All is plain heroic magnitude of actual life. No spiritual imaginative light is effused around him, like that from The French Revolution and Literature. 41 which, as from a background, stands out the solitary figure of Wordsworth's Leech-gatherer. Nor shall we forget the youthful preacher or ranter, who chooses the mountain-side for his pulpit, and has a better gospel, he thinks, to preach than that of Methodism grown respect- able and rich ; we love him, with his eager eye, his wistful expression, his hectic cheek, and pleading hands, as we love some pale sunbeam on a day of gloom, pre- destined to be quickly swallowed by the darkness. And around these figures we see the streets, the houses, the hamlets, the veritable Yorkshire hedgerows, and hills, and streams, the majestic barrenness of the York- shire moors. The one spiritual presence which breathes through universal nature in the poetry of Wordsworth we ( are not aware of in like manner or degree in the poetry of Ebenezer Elliott. Nor have the objects of external nature dear to him received that mould of shapely beauty which water and vale in Wordsworth's lake country possess. But the air is pure and free ; beautiful wild things lie around us in a kind of harmonised confusion ; we hear the singing of birds and the voices of rivers, and everywhere are unluxurious, hardy, yet delicate flowers. The silence or vital sounds of the open country bring healing and refreshment to an ear that has been harassed by the din of machinery ; the wide peaceful light is a benediction to the eye that has smarted in blear haze of the myriad-chimneyed city. We become familiar with recurrent names of hill and stream, until the least musical of them, with its sharp northern edge, acquires a pleasantness like the keen flavour of some rough-rinded fruit. 42 The French Revolution and Literature. " Flowers peep, trees bud, boughs tremble, rivers run ; The redwing saith it is a glorious morn. Blue are thy Heavens, thou Highest ! and thy sun Shines without cloud, all fire. How sweetly, borne On wings of morning o'er the leafless thorn The tiny wren's small twitter warbles near ! • ••••••• Five rivers, like the fingers of a hand, Flung from black mountains mingle and are one Where sweetest valleys quit the wild and grand, And eldest forests, o'er the silvan Don, Bid their immortal brother journey on, A stately pilgrim, watch'd by all the hills- Say, shall we wander where, through warriors' graves, The infant Yewden, mountain-cradled, trills Her Doric notes % Or where the Locksley rav«s Of broil and battle, and the rocks and caves , Dream yet of ancient days 1 Or where the sky Darkens o'er Rivilin, the clear and cold, That throws his blue length like a snake from high 1 Or, where deep azure brightens into gold O'er Sheaf, that mourns in Eden ? " This poetry of external nature has not the rich and soft feeling to which agricultural or pastoral life gives rise. Elliott sings no half-humorous, half-tender elegy to a Puir Mailie, like that in which the Scotch peasant laments his pet yowe. He does not, like that tender- souled lyrist of Revolution in France — Pierre Dupont — confess the deep comradeship which binds his life to " Les grands bceufs blancs marques de roux." The wilderness, in Elliott's conception, belongs to God and to the poet; the wide enclosures of land are the property of the peer by day, and of the poacher by night. At the time when " The Village Patriarch " was gaining the attention it deserved, English poetry had The French Revolution and Liter attire. 43 touched low-water mark after the spring-tide of the early part of the century. It was not Elliott's billowy incurerion of song that foretol d * n P \x\rr\ <~>f the* t.irlp A little ripple of poetry, edged with silver spray, went quivering up the sand. Some few eyes noticed it, and Triton out to seaward blew his triumphant conch. Enoch Wray was stalwart and real. The Claribels, and Adelines, and Sea Fairies of Mr Tennyson's volume of 1830 seem a faint impalpable troop of poetic creatures ; yet it was they and their successors who were destined to call back the singing-tide with insupportable advance upon our shores. Man does not live by bread alone. We are all conscious that we have received from Mr Tennyson something which is real, substantia l, and corresponde nt to our need s»_— He is not a poet of the Revolution ; his part has been to assert that freedom ^ must be one with order, th a + highest liberty ^pp gists in — obedience to law. The revolt against ancient wrongs had accomplished part of its work ; now the temperate wisdom of England was to qualify the passionate hopes and energies which had been born in France ; duties were to assert themselves by the side of rights ; the li beral Conservatism of Mr Tennyson \yflg to pyhihit, 1 4 order united with progress ; th e radical conservatism o f *- Mr Carlyle was alike to initiate and to restrain. 187: THE TRANSCENDENTAL MOVEMENT AND LITERATURE. That some of the finest and most generous spirits of our time should be driven into opposition, almost into isola- tion, and should now, as it were in the desert, prophesy against us who heed them not, is a significant, perhaps an alarming fact. A minority which consists of an elite is always a witness for some despised or neglected truths. Some among our elder writers, who were indeed spiritual masters, look with an estranged, sad gaze at what we call our progress, our " triumphs of civilization;" and where among our younger writers is there promise of any spiritual master to take their place, any prophetic soul ? Is the hardy and aspiring school of Positivist thinkers to be succeeded by a pessimist school, and the reverence which gathers around the name of Comte to transfer itself to that of the great Buddhist of Frankfort ? Is humanity to prove itself less capable of self-worship than of self-abhorrence? Meanwhile a few persons may look back to the days when spiritual faith and hope and love were the air which young souls breathed, days when a man would go to the seers to inquire of God, and when God Himself seemed to be not far from every one of us. The admirable working man, who on the first day of each month hastens to expend his tenpence on the The Transcendental Movement. 45 purchase of Mr Ruskin's Fors Clavigera, and meditates until the appearance of the succeeding number upon its melancholy vaticinations, must by this time be convinced that he has fallen on evil days. T he democratic mov e- ment, inaugu rated by the French Revolut ion, is the object ofMrRuskin's bitterest hostility. From it have been derived our loss of reverence" our loose morals, our bad manners, our mammon -worship, our materialism, our spirit of pushing self-interest. The modern scientific movement appears to Mr Ruskin to be in great part a ludicrous imposture, a dull kind of learned ignorance, with which names take the place of things, diagrams the place of vision, and death the place of life. More robust spirits than Mr Ruskin will refuse to be thwarted or turned aside by what is ugly and repulsive in some aspects of our material civilization. They will refuse to expect that the crude years of .an industrial epoch, in which everything acts upon so vast a scale, should exhibit the coherence, order, and grace of civilizations which were small in scale, which themselves took loug to emerge from barbarism, and which are happily remembered not as they were in their totality, but through some highly favoured types and examples that have survived the oblivion which overtakes the chaff and draff of the time. It is enough if we can see within its rough envelope the living germ of future order. Those who possess a moderated but steadfast con- fidence in the beneficent tendencies of the laws of the world, would not set forward on behalf of the present age its select and illustrious persons ; they would not set an Abraham Lincoln over against a Saint Louis, 46 The Transcendental Movement. although the noble disinterestedness, the steadfastness 1 of aim, the practical good sense, the pliability and tolerance in detail, the heroic achievement, of our modern Yankee crusader,, might bear comparison with the chivalric virtues (among which certainly practical wisdom was not one) of the mediaeval soldier-saint. Defenders of the present time would rather let the stress of their argument lie on the fact that if ever our democratic age be organized, the organization will be not for a class but for the entire society — for workman as well as capitalist, for peasant as well as proprietor, for woman as well as man ; and such a complex organization cannot be the product of one day, nor of one century. We accept courageously the rudeness of our vast industrial civilization. The results of that other movement also, the scientific, which Mr Ruskin passionately reproaches or regards with smiling disdain, we accept with gratitude. And yet were these our sole sources of hope, to some of us the burden of life would seem to be hardly worth taking up. Accumulated materials,, whether materials for food, fire, and clothing, or materials of knowledge to feed the intellect, do not satisfy the soul. Are we tempted to enter the fierce struggle for material success? Are we tempted to forfeit our highest powers in the mere collection and systematizing of knowledge ? Let us pause ; if our utmost ambition were gratified, how barren a failure would be such success ! Nay, even in duties, in the items of a laborious morality, we may cease to possess that life which is also light and incommunicable peace. Surrounded with possessions of wealth, of state, of splendour, or of culture, of erudition, of knowledge, or The Transcendental Movement. 47 even of the dutiful works of a servant who is not a son, the inmost self may be poor, shrunken, starved, miserable, dead. What shall it profit a man though he gain the whole world and lose his own soul ? And what shall it profit an age, a generation of men, if it lose its own soul % We accept joyfully the facts of material progress. Tons of iron, tons of coal, corn and wine, cotton and hemp, firkins of the best butter, barrels of salted pork ; let these have their praises, and be chanted in the hymns of our poets of democracy. Knowledge about the brains of an ape, knowledge about the coprolites of an extinct brute, the dust of stars, the spawn of frogs, the vibrations of a nerve; to such knowledge we cry hail, and give it joyous welcome. Then, none the less, we ask, "But the soul — what of it? What of the most divine portion of the life of a man, and of a society of men V The word transcendental may be used in both a definite and a vague sense ;. in a definite sense as opposed to the empirical way of thinking dominant during the eighteenth century, alike in France and in England. The empirical thinker derives all our ideas from experience, some members of the school asserting that it is through the senses alone that we obtain these ideas. The transcendental thinker believes that the mind contributes to its own stores ideas or forms of thought not derived from experience. As to a Divine Being, and man's relations with Him, the empirical thinker may be a theist, but he will ordinarily require an apparatus, a mechanism, to connect the Divine Spirit with the spirit of man ; the transcendental thinker can 48 The Transcendental Movement. with difficulty endure the notion of such a mechanism or apparatus ; the natural and the supernatural seem to him to touch, embrace, or interpenetrate one another ; in the external world and in his own soul the Divine Presence for ever haunts, startles, and waylays him. So far, the meaning of the word transcendental is definite enough. But a word, like a comet, has a tail as well as a head, or at least a coma as well as a nucleus, and much vague talk about the Infinite, the Immensities, the Eternal Verities, the Eternal Silences, and what-not, is properly a part of transcendentalism, that is, of its coma, or its yet fainter and more extended tail. We are bound to recognize this vague transcendentalism, even if we cannot accurately define it. Much has justly been said of fallacies which arise from not defining our words; it has not, perhaps, been sufficiently noted how fallacies arise from assuming that a formal definition of a word is equipollent to the word considered as a winged thing and acting with a vital power. Now, — whether the fact please