TREASON AND PLOT MARTIN HUME LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNiM RIVERSIDE 1' / TREASON AND PLOT BY THE SAME AUTHOR THE GREAT LORD BURGHLEY A STUDY IN ELIZABETHAN STATECRAFT With Frontispiece. Demy 8vo, 5s. net " In Major Hume's volume we have at last an adequate biography of Lord Burghley." — Spectator. "An able, thoughtful, and stimulating biography of the founder of the house of Cecil." — Speaker. " The life of Elizabeth's most illustrious statesman is the best piece of work that Mr. Hume has yet produced." — Daily News. ' ' Will take its place among the most notable and authoritative books about the Elizabethan Age." — Glasgow Herald. Treason AND Plot STRUGGLES FOR jr jr CATHOLIC SUPREMACY IN THE LAST YEARS OF QUEEN ELIZABETH jt^ MARTIN a"^. S. HUME editor of the calendars of spanish state papers (public record office) ^ ILontion JAMES NISBKT i^ CO., LIMITED 21 BERNERS STREET 1901 PA 55^ Priated by Ballantyne, Hanson &* Co. At the Ballantyne Press TO THE MANY UNKNOWN^ FRIENDS IN ENGLAND AND AMERICA WHOSE WELCOME LETTERS OF APPROVAL HAVE SWEETENED MY LABOURS IN A GRUDGING AND TOILSOME FIELD MARTIN A. S. HUME. PREFACE The adoption of the Reformation by England was an event which did not alone concern the nation itself, but threw out of balance the whole edifice of European power, built upon traditional alliances and international policies that had survived for centuries. However much it may have suited the temporal ends of Spanish monarchs to incite their subjects to religious exaltation, it was not crusading zeal or spiritual fervour which impelled them for half a century to lavish the blood and substance of their countries, and to exhaust every expedient, from marriage to murder, for the purpose of bringing England back to the Catholic fold. A Protestant England and a divided Germany inevitably meant the decadence and final ruin of the great Spanish empire which the " Catholic sovereigns " had reared upon a base of bigotry. Without a close alliance with England, and the certainty of efficient support from Germany, Spain found herself with a jealous rival, France, on each flank. On the one hand, her dominions in Italy, only held by the right of the sword, would sooner or later be lost to her ; and, on the other hand, Flanders and Holland, shut off by land if the viii PREFACE Italian dominion passed away, could not be reached from Spain even by water, unless England held the Channel and England were friendly. When the spread of the Reformed doctrines in Holland drove the Burghers to shake off the yoke of intolerant Spain, and Protestant England, for her own national safety, found it necessary to aid the insurgents, it became no longer a matter of future policy, but of vital and immediate necessity, for Philip II. to persuade or force England into alliance or benevolent neutrality. The need was still further increased when the Huguenot power in France bade fair to overcome the Catholic supremacy there, and thus to leave Spain isolated without the possibility of alliance either with England or France : for it must be remembered that Spain could not afford to deal on equal terms with a Protestant power, because the admission of any question as to the supremacy of the Church, in all its rigidity, would have struck at the power by which Spain held together her mixed and recently reconciled populations, and have invalidated the exclusive right she claimed over the whole of the New World. It was, therefore, a matter of national life or death for her that England, by some means, should be made Catholic. On the other hand, the circumstances which sur- rounded the birth and accession of Elizabeth were such that an acknowledgment on her part of the l^apal supremacy would have branded her as a bastard, and would have deprived her of her here- PREFACE IX ditary right to rule. Whilst this was the case with her, there is no doubt that her personal leanings were to a great extent in favour of a ceremonious form of worship, and of the authority and dignity which belonged to the ancient Church ; and it was equally important for England as it was for Spain to prevent the Flemish dominions of the latter power from ever falling into the hands of France. It will be understood, therefore, that, although the religious problems between England and Spain were opposed and irreconcilable, their national and traditional interests still to a great extent coincided ; and it was this latter circumstance which enabled Elizabeth and Lord Burghley, through a long series of years, to play their consummate game of balance and chicanery, which paralysed Spain for harm, whilst England was growing in potency and wealth. The imminence of the succession of a Huguenot to the throne of France, which threatened an approximation of French religious interests with those of England, at length compelled Philip to abandon a temporising policy with Elizabeth. If he could not force England to be Catholic before Henry of Navarre ruled France as a Protestant and made common cause with Elizabeth, then indeed had the star of Spanish power sunk to rise no more. But, as was usual with all his resolutions of action, Philip adopted his policy too late ; and the defeat of the Armada exhibited to a scoffing and X PREFACE envious world a nation already in decadence, not only in material strength, but in the moral forces which had previously been the principal secret of her success. But though her Armada was defeated and Spain was riddled with corruption, her national necessity to make England sufficiently Catholic to be a fit ally for her ends remained unchanged. Her dreams of greatness, moreover, continued to loom large in her uneasy slumbers long after the decay of her potency had set in. The Catholic interests in England were many, and, for a multitude of reasons, devotional, sentimental, and mundane, a consider- able portion of the people would have welcomed the return of a Catholic dispensation. But the long years of antagonism and informal warfare which the circumstances just mentioned had produced between England and Spain, had before the last de- cade of Elizabeth's reign given birth to a new pride of country in the breasts of most Englishmen, and a determination that a people who had shown their inability even to hold their own against England on the sea should not gain dominion over the land by means of religion or otherwise. It was this new patriotism that divided the Catholic forces in England, and the knowledge, then general, of Spain's selfish objects that divided them abroad ; and, as a consequence of the changed position, the struggles to impose Catholic supremacy upon Eng- land that followed the catastrophe of the Armada differed entirely from those that preceded it. PREFACE xi The story of these straggles up to 1588 has been told fully by Froude and many other historians ; but it has usually been assumed that with the defeat of the Armada the strenuous attempts to bring England again into the circle of the Roman Catholic Church and to a close alliance with Spain came to an end. That this was far from being the case will be admitted by those who honour me by reading these pages, in which I have en- deavoured to set forth, as fully as the limits of one volume would permit, the continuous efforts made by the various Catholic elements, English and foreign, to establish the supremacy of their faith in England from 1593 to the accession of James in 1603 ; which latter date marks the final extinc- tion of their hopes. Much of the material from which the story is written is now used for the purpose for the first time, especially the Spanish MSS. transcribed by the present writer at Simancas, and abstracted in the last volume of the Spanish Calendar of Elizabeth. I have also drawn upon the calendared and un- calendared Irish State papers, the latest volume of the Venetian papers, the Hatfield papers, calen- dared and uncalendared ; and, for the story of the Lopez conspirac}^ I have been permitted to make abstracts of some interesting manuscripts in the possession of Lord Calthorpe, and also some un- published papers in the x\rchives Nationales, Paris. I have endeavoured to set forth the historical facts xii PREFACE in all simplicity, and with absolute detachment so far as regards their religious aspect ; and in every case where I have ventured to draw a deduction of any sort, the evidence upon which I have de- pended is placed before the reader, in order that he may judge for himself how far my conclusions are justified. This book does not claim to be a contribution, however small, to religious contro- versy, but is a diligent attempt to add something to the knowledge of historical fact, and to set forth, by the light of modern research, one phase of the important last ten years of the reign of Elizabeth ; a decade which, for various reasons, has been inadequately treated by recent English historians. MARTIN A. S. HUME. CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION PAGE Change in the European situation caused by the defeat of the Armada — The Jesuits and the English Mission — The unmask- ing of Philip's designs — The influence of England's new maritime strength — Spain's renewed preparations for the struggle I CHAPTER II Intrigues of the Scottish Catholics with Spain — James's share in them — The "Spanish blanks"— The Parliament of 1593 — Fears of a new Spanish invasion — John Cecil's mission from Scotland to Spain — The influence of Father Persons — The Spanish mission to the Scottish Catholic Lords — John Cecil's betrayal of the cause 23 CHAPTER III Appeal to Spain of the Irish Catholics — Meeting of the Chiefs in Donegal — The Archbishop of Tuam's mission to Spain — James sends another envoy to Spain — The battle of Glenlivat — Walter Lindsay in Madrid — Suppression of the Catholic Lords in Scotland — Their renewed appeal to Philip — Its failure, and the reason for it 50 CHAPTER IV The condition of the Catholics in England — Disagreement between the Jesuits and Seculars — Party politics in the English Court — Real and pretended plots against the Queen — Father Young's confessions — The irreconcilable English refugees — The con- xiv CONTENTS fessions of Webster — Polwhele's and Collen'a plots — Daniel's and Cahill's confessions — Arrest of Father Henry Walpole — The doubtful evidence in support of most of the so-called plots 80 CHAPTER V The conspiracy of Dr. Lopez — The confessions of Yorke and Williams — The alleged connection of the Spanish Ministers with the murder plots 115 Appendix to Chapter V 162 CHAPTEE VI The complete separation of the two sections of English Catholics — Alarm in England at the Spanish armaments — Drake's last voyage — Tyrone's declaration — Promise of Spanish aid — Irish emissaries to Spain — The expeditions of Captains Cobos, Medinilla, and Cisneros to Ireland — Their description of Ire- land — Breakdown of the Spanish Administration — Essex's attack upon Cadiz 165 CHAPTER VII Mission of Lindsay to Eome — Father John Cecil and Fury Ogilvie in Rome— Their voyage to Spain — Address of the English Catholic irreconcilables to Philip — The advice of Father Per- sons — Preparations in Lisbon for the Irish expedition — Strength of the armament — Failure and return to Spain — Meeting of the Irish chiefs with Cobos in the Monastery of Donegal — A new truce with Tyrone 201 CHAPTER VIII Fears of a Spanish invasion of England — English preparations — Essex's voyage — Lopez de Soto's letters — Strength of the Ade- lantado's fleet (1597) — Its inglorious return to Spain — Re- newed appeal of the Irish rebels to Spain — Tyrone's discontent with the Spaniards — Another truce with Tyrone , , , 242 CONTENTS XV CHAPTER IX PACE The two sections of English Catholics and the succession — Arabella Stuart versus the Infanta — Lord Beauchamp — Party conflicts in England with regard to the peace with Spain — The aims of the Jesuits — Paralysis of the Spanish naval administration— - Renewed alarm in England— Its groundlessness — Parleys with Tyrone — His renewed appeals to Spain — Critical condition of the English rule in Ireland — ^The battle of Armagh . .271 CHAPTER X Letters of John Colville— James intrigues with the Catholic Powers — The " Wisbech Stirs " — Recriminations against the Jesuit faction — The mvirder plot of Squire and Rolls — Father Wal- pole's connection with it — The desire of the Archduke for peace with England — Successes of the Irish rebels — Discontent of Essex — His government in Ireland — The march through Munster — His parley with Tyrone — His disobedience and re- turn to England — His arrest . . . . . . .310 CHAPTER XI The aspect of the succession question in England — Cecil and Essex — Negotiations for j^eace with Spain — Renewed alarm of Spanish invasion in England — Measures for defence — Pro- bable intentional exaggeration of the fears for political reasons — James continues to intrigue with the Catholics for support — The Pope's offer to him — Fitzhei-bert's address to Philip re- specting the Scottish advances — Lord Semple's mission to Madrid — The future religion of England trembling in the balance 361 CHAPTER XII Essex in disgrace — ^His attempts at reconciliation — Small Spanish help to the Irish rebels — The mission of Mateo de Oviedo, Archbishop of Dublin, and Martin de la Cerda to Ireland^ Resolution in Spain to aid Tyrone actively — Irish envoys to Spain— Helplessness of Philip and discouragement of Tyrone xvi CONTENTS PAOB — Father Persons' appeals to Philip to take a decided course on the English succession— Discussions in the Council of State on the subject — Father Creswell's efforts in Madrid — The projects of the Earl of Bothwell — Essex and James. Abor- tive peace negotiations with Spain — Essex's rebellion and execution . . . . . . . . . -391 CHAPTER XIII The change in the succession question in consequence of the death of Essex — The secret understanding between James and Cecil — James's new attitude towards the Catholics — Lord Montjoy in Ireland — Occupation of Derry — Disappointment of Tyrone and O'Donnell with Spain — La Cerda's mission to Ireland- Preparations for a new Spanish expedition to Ireland — Carew in Muuster — Sailing of the expedition — O'Sullivan Beare — The Spaniards in Kinsale — The siege — The Spaniards isolated in Kinsale, Castlehaveu, Dunboy, and Baltimore — Defeat of Tyrone — Capitulation of Kinsale — The O'SuUivans and Dun- boy — O'Donnell in Spain — Death of O'Donnell — Exodus of the O'Sullivaus, pardon of Tyrone, and the pacification of Ireland 438 CHAPTER XIV Mission of Thomas James to Spain — The policy of Philip III. to- wards the English succession — Discussion in the Council of State — The new policy adopted too late— Cecil's conduct — Dynastic intrigues in England — Arabella Stuart's strange behaviour — Suggested explanation — Lord Beauchamp — Attempted flight of Arabella — Death of Elizabeth — Cecil triumphant — Extinction of the last hope of establishing Catholic supremacy by means of foreign intervention . .478 INDEX 5" TREASON AND PLOT CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY Change in the European situation caused hy the defeat of the Armada — The Jesuits and the English Mission — The unmasking of Philip's designs — The influence of England's new maritime strength — Spain's renewed preparations for the struggle. With the flight of the great Armada, beaten and demoralised, into the wild equinoctial gales of the northern seas, the political and religious problems of Europe underwent a change, which, like most far-reaching changes, was only very gradually and imperfectly realised by those immediately concerned. For a hundred years Spain had imposed herself upon the world to an extent entirely unwarranted by her native resources and the numbers of her population : she had discovered, subjected, and organised a vast continent : the commercial and mineral wealth of both East and West had been proclaimed as her monopoly ; and throughout the world her arrogant claim to superiority, and to the leadership of orthodox Christianity, had been humbly conceded by all but a few who were regarded as little better than blasphemers for their denial of Spanish, supremacy. A 2 TREASON AND PLOT What was the secret that had carried this bundle of antagonistic racial and political units, only nominally a nation, irresistibly through Europe and America, and had in one leap raised Castile to the first place amidst the powers of the world? Not the wealth of the Indies alone ; for, thanks to a vicious fiscal system, the gold and silver of the mines enriched every nation of the earth more than they did Spain. Not natural gifts of energy, intellect, or valour ; for these were not specially conspicuous in the Spanish people either before or after the fleeting period of their country's greatness. Not the impetus of a united nationality stirred to patriotic ambition by the consciousness of strength derived from com- munity of soil, race, and institutions ; for such a feeling could have no place amongst peoples varying in origin, tongue, traditions, and national history, who were loosely bound together with the monarch for their only tie. The cause of Spain's sudden greatness, as of her inevitable fall, must be discovered in the circum- stances of her unification. Unity of some sort was vitally necessary if the ambitions of her successive rulers were to be fulfilled ; and, failing the slow process of racial amalgamation, for which they could not wait, Ferdinand the Catholic and his immediate successors deliberately forged in the fires of the Inquisition the weapon with which they were to conquer half the world. The Spanish nation was bound together by the spiritual exaltation which came of the religious persecution of the minority by the majority. The Inquisition was popular, powerful, and revered by Spaniards at large, because INTRODUCTORY 3 it flattered their pride with the idea that their faith alone had divine sanction, and that God had en- dowed them with the exclusive right of imposing that faith upon the rest of the world. They were a chosen people, spiritually superior to others ; and in the sacred cause for which they were specially ordained to fight, cruelty, rapine, and blood were praiseworthy and gracious in the sight of the Lord. Mystic fervour and a belief in their mission to exterminate, at any cost, those who had strayed into the service of the devil, gave to Spaniards in the sixteenth century the unity necessary for their rulers to use them as a solid weapon for mundane ends. Much as they might hate each other nation- ally, they were all knit together in the fierce assur- ance that they were a divinely favoured people with a mission. This was the spirit which explained their burning enthusiasm and carried the ferocious men-at-arms of Charles and Philip victorious through the world. Their fervour and confidence dazzled the eyes of other nations to the weakness of material resource which lay behind their haughty, cool assumption of unquestionable superiority. Such claims would have been resented generally, as they were by a few in England, but for the absolute conviction of every individual Spaniard that he was on the side of God ; and that, as a consequence of this solidarity, all other men were as mire beneath his feet. The moral effect of such a conviction was incalculable. The first staggering blow dealt at this source of power fell upon Spanish hearts with the defeat of the Armada. All that spiritual superstition, all 4 TREASON AND PLOT that frantic devotion could do for the supposed invincible fleet had been done. Prayers for its success had been offered up by millions ; sacred relics and bones of saints enough to stock a cemetery had been carried forth in processions innumerable ; Pope and cardinals had blessed and sprinkled ; kings, princes, and peoples had fasted and sacrificed ; all Spain and Portugal were aflame vrith religious exaltation and the positive assurance of an easy victory over God's enemies. For such an expedition on such an errand defeat was surely im- possible, and in that firm belief the soldiers, at least, on the fleet went forth to liberate a yearn- ing people held captive by a small minority of heretics. But even as the Armada, under its craven admiral, hustled powerlessly up the Channel in the six days' running fight with foes that eluded and harassed it, the first sinister cry went up from hearts already disillusioned and well-nigh broken: ''God has forsaken us;" and when the battered wrecks of the ships that were left of the panic-stricken fleet slowly crept back to Santander with the few famished and plague-stricken survivors of their gallant com- panies, the loss of material power, great as it was, that the country had suffered, was the smallest part of the disaster. For the conviction of divine aid^ the certainty of being on the right side, which had been the secret of Spain's strength for a hundred years, was wounded now beyond surgery, and Spaniards, if they fought at all, must in future fight on an equality with the rest of mankind with worldly weapons and skill. INTRODUCTORY 5 The disillusionment came home but slowly to the mass of the Spanish people. The first wail of sorrow that went up was mingled with a cry for vindication and revenge. The towns of Spain, one after the other, offered new contributions, ruined and desolate as the country was, in order that a more powerful expedition than before should at once be fitted out under other commanders and teach a lasting lesson to the insolent heretic, before whom Medina Sidonia had fled helplessly. But as the winter wore on, and the extent of the catastrophe was better understood, the gloom darkened. One of Philip's own confessors boldly told him, that "though his prayers and processions were very good things, yet it was certain that God gave ear to other voices before his," ^ and all prayers on account of the xirmada were publicly ordered to be discontinued (22nd October). "The better informed," we are told, " begin to think that if all these ships are lost it will be impossible to make another expedi- tion next year" (22nd October). And so with dismay the Spanish people gradually realised — as their king had done from the first — that they them- selves were in danger of attack, and that, far from thinking of inflicting punishment upon England, they must strain every nerve first to defend their own coasts and commerce from devastation. " If Drake should take the sea," wrote the Venetian ambassador, " and meet the Peruvian fleet or make a descent on the shores of Spain, he would find no obstacle to his depredations, and he might even burn a part of the ships that have come back, for ^ Lippomano to the Doge, October i, 1589. Venetian Papers. 6 TREASON AND PLOT they are lying scattered without troops to guard them, as all the soldiers reach home sick and in the bad plight I have reported." ^ " If Drake were to go to the Azores now," wrote the same authority, " he would not only ruin the whole of the Indian trade, but could quite easily make himself master of the islands." " Philip put as brave a face upon it as he could, and talked about selling his silver candlesticks to arm for an attack upon England ; but he knew full well now that before he could hope to prevail over his foe he must learn the lesson to which he had been deaf for years, and must face the English with ships as mobile and sailors as skilful as their own. For, thanks to Drake and his school, the ship was henceforth a fighting entity of itself, not only a machine for carrying fighters into the fray. A new maritime power indeed was born of the knowledge. England had the start, and only by patient work and slow degrees could Spain hope to change her material and tactics to meet the new departure. With his laborious stolidity Philip turned his hand to the creation of a new navy. He was desperately impecunious ; the Pope had scornfully refused the subsidy he had promised to the Armada, and the Cortes, failing to understand the need for the laying down of the new ships, of which the construction would occupy years, haggled over their voluntary subsidy. But to Drake and the English seamen, at least, the position was as clear as it was ^ Lippomano to the Doge, October 22. Venetian Calendar. 2 Ibid., December 8. INTRODUCTORY 7 to Philip : Spain was no match for England upon the sea until her ships and tactics were radically altered. It was seen that religious exaltation and a belief in a monopoly of divine protection, however good in their way as aids, were bad substitutes for the ordinary m.undane precautions for securing victory. Thenceforward, therefore, the material aspect of the attempt of Philip to impose Catholi- cism upon England by force of arms assumed an entirely new condition, and for years to come Spain was forced to stand upon the defensive to save her world-wide commerce from utter destruction. A direct attack upon England itself was out of the question. The altered conditions of warfare springing from the defeat of the Armada almost coincided in point of time with a political event of still greater mag- nitude, namely, the discovery of Philip's real aims. Long before the rulers of Spain had dreamt of raising a vast empire on a basis of religious bigotry, it had been an article of faith that a close alliance was necessary, in the interests of both parties, be- tween England and the possessor of the Flemish seaboard ; and when the crowns of Castile and Aragon passed to the House of Austria-Burgundy, this vital necessity passed with it. Spain with a friendly England could always hope to hold France in check ; but with England against her, and in close union with France, Spain's main road to Flanders was closed ; and France, free from suspi- cion of her neighbour across the Channel, was able to oppose the objects of Aragon in the Mediterranean and Italy. This had been the reason that Charles V., 8 TREASON AND PLOT champion of Catholicism though he was, had not dared to quarrel with Henry VIII. or Edward VI., notwithstanding the Protestant reformation and the repudiation by Henry of his lawful Spanish wife. This was the reason for Philip's marriage with his elderly and unprepossessing cousin, Mary of Eng- land ; and this was the reason why the Catholic King for thirty years left no stone unturned to win without war Elizabeth and England to the Catho- lic side, or at least to neutrality. In vain had his hot- headed councillors alternately prayed and hectored at the beginning of Elizabeth's reign, and urged that the Catholic majority in England should be aided to throw off the yoke of the heretic Queen. In vain did ambassador after ambassador try to force the King's hands by fomenting treason in England and openly advocating war. Philip knew better than they that he dared not openly break with Elizabeth whilst jealous France was on his flank and his own Netherlands were in full revolt against him. So he had meekly to see his commerce ruined, his treasure stolen, his subjects hanged by English pirates, and his coasts and colonies violated for thirty years before he decided to risk everything on the issue of an invasion. Religion was his stalking-horse, and an effective one ; but he would never have gone to war with England on religious grounds for the sole purpose of making her Catholic. It was necessary for him that she should be Catholic because he needed her friendship and a cessation of her aid to the Protestant Netherlanders ; and when it became evident, even to his slow mind, that, for all her dexterous balancing and religious INTRODUCTORY 9 coquetry, Elizabeth meant to stand permanently to the Reformed doctrines and her own supremacy, he was forced to fight or to throw up the sponge. Philip, both from character and on principle, loved to work in the darkness ; and it was the first condition of success in the use of his religious instrument that his agents should not be aware of the political objects he had ultimately in view. During all the years they had paltered with treason and murder in England they had chafed and marvelled at their master's cold irresponsiveness to their activity. With hardly an efi'ort in the beginning of Elizabeth's reign he might have turned the scale, and have made England at least as Catholic as Henry VIII. left it when he died. What his agents failed to understand was, that whilst it was desirable for Philip that England should be sufficiently Catholic to be friendly with him and to refrain from helping his discontented subjects, it was infinitely better for his ends that she should remain heretic and neutral than that she should become Catholic and French; for if Elizabeth fell, the next heiress to the English crown was Mary Stuart, practically a French princess under the control of ambitious and capable kinsmen of the same nation. So for years before he struck his blow the King's crafty intri- gues went on to make Mary Stuart a subservient tool, and to pledge and subsidise the Guises for the promotion of their ambitions in France, in order that they might not interfere with Spanish aims in England. During the period that Mary was captive the religious position in England underwent a complete lo TREASON AND PLOT change, and at the time of her death the contending elements on both sides were finally ranged. The mass of the English people, except in London and the eastern counties, were Catholics ; but the doc- trines and practice of the Romish Church had remained more or less in a fluid state until the publication of the Trentine decrees in 1564. The cautious compromise devised by Elizabeth and Cecil had conciliated many, and for the first few years of the reign the population at large, although they might regret the avowedly papal regime of Mary Tudor, outwardly conformed to the established wor- ship, and, but for the action of extreme parties on both sides, would probably have ended in complete conformity. Like Philip himself, Elizabeth and her chief adviser were influenced in their action by poli- tical rather than religious considerations ; but the English Protestant clergy and laymen, who in the days of the Marian persecution had found shelter and hospitality in Switzerland, came back to the land of their birth burning with zeal to purge the worship of their Church of all traces of Rome. To them political considerations were nothing. In the days of their exile they had seen simplicity and adherence to the very word of Scripture made the test of holiness by communities and men whom they knew to be good, and they were rebellious and im- patient to see that the Protestant English Church, for whose establishment they had yearned and prayed, included in its practice much which savoured of their Romish persecutors. Vestments, lights, incense, and images to them were anathema in any circumstances, and Protestant nonconformity was INTRODUCTORY 1 1 born of the determination of earnest men to prefer religious purity to political expediency. Violence and rancour on the one extreme were answered by violence and rancour on the other. The laymen of Catholic leanings, offended at the Puritanism of many of the Reformed clergy, began to absent them- selves from church, and sought again the ministra- tions of priests of the old faith. The country was flooded by ardent young missionaries from Allen's Seminary at Douai, who, in disguise and at the risk of their lives, went from one Catholic house to another, exhorting and encouraging Englishmen to stand firm to the faith of their fathers. Their first mission was unquestionably religious alone, but unfortunately in some instances, as was the case in the Northern rebellion, they were too useful as mes- sengers and instruments, or too zealous, entirely to avoid participation in treason. In 1579 the activity of the Seminarist missionaries aroused the jealousy of the young, vigorous, militant organisa- tion whose especial province was propaganda, and the Jesuits, much to the annoyance of the secular priests, insisted on taking a leading part in the Eng- lish mission.^ They, too, came at first on a purely 1 The disturbances in the English College at Rome, an offshoot of Allen's Seminary at Douai, if they were not deliberately fomented by the Jesuit interest, at least gave the Society its opportunity for cap- turing the Seminaries, and for intruding itself into the English Mis- sion. It was not without hesitation, however, that the ruling Jesuits allowed Persons and Campion to start on their mission to England. Even before they left, the English seculars were in fear that the Jesuit fathers would assume an authority out of proportion to their numbers, and would meddle in state affairs. To calm this fear, the rules for guidance of the Jesuits of the English Mission (1580) strictly laid down that "they must not mix themselves with affairs of state, nor in England must they speak, or allow others to speak in their presence, 12 TREASON AND PLOT religious errand ; but one at least of them, Father Persons, soon changed his plans, and thencefor- ward until her death every plot for the liberation of Mary Stuart was directed and managed by Jesuits under the direction of Persons, whose masterful energy and zeal drew Allen along the same path. Their treason and disloyalty were punished by pro- scription and persecution.^ The Jesuits saw plainly after the fate of the Duke of Norfolk and the collapse of the Northern Earls that Elizabeth would never be overturned except by the aid of a foreign force. Whence could such a force come ? Not from France, for there the religious divisions were more acute even than in England ; and Catharine de Medici only kept her footing by preventing either Catholics or Huguenots from monopolising the national power. The Pope might thunder excom- munications, but he could send no galleys out of against the Queen, except perhaps in company of those whose fidelity has long been steadfastly proved " (quoted by Law from Simpson's transcripts, 1085, Brussels Archives). Campion certainly confined himself to his reliL;ious mission, which he considered invincible, and so went to martyrdom. But Persons soon convinced liiniself that one Jesuit political missioner could do more than a hundred of Allen's easy- going spiritual priests ; and notwithstanding the solemn oath he took to the Catholic Synod, which he secretly convened in Southwark (July 1580), that the Mission "was purely spiritual, and had no concern or knowledge of aft'airs of state," he soon took the direction of all politi- cal plots in England. Thenceforward the Jesuits, very few in number at any time in England, constituted themselves a sort of aristocracy of missioners, who looked upon the purely religious secular priests as underlings, and treated them accordingly, to the indignation of the Litter, as will be seen in the course of this book. (On these points see Simpson's " Campion ; " T. G. Law's " Jesuits and Seculars ; " " Dod," edited by Tierney ; Knox's "Life and Letters of Cardinal Allen;" "The Archpriest Controversy" (Camden Society), &c.) ' In 1585 it was made high treason for any priest ordained abroad to enter England. INTRODUCTORY 13 the Mediterranean, and, moreover, was sparing of his money ; so to Philip alone could the extreme Catholics and the Jesuits of England look for the liberation of their country from Protestantism. But at what cost ? Philip clearly would not incur the risk of invading England for the purpose merely of placing upon the throne a half-French princess, whose son might, for aught he could foresee, be more heretical and inimical to Spain than Eliza- beth ; and who, in any case, would transfer with his crown to England the ancient Scottish tradition of close alliance with France. So the Jesuits set to work to overcome this difficulty at the expense of England's independence ; and for the last few years of the unfortunate Mary's life they carefully enmeshed her in the toils, until she had solemnly disinherited her son for heresy and made Philip of Spain her heir. Cautiously, too, Persons and his satellites in Flanders, Rome, and Spain spread the idea of Philip's own descent from Edward III., in order that in due time he might claim to succeed Mary to the English crown. But when the execu- tion of Mary forced the Spanish king to some extent to show his hand, and to unmask his political aim, there came the inevitable parting of the ways be- tween loyal and disloyal English Catholics. The extraordinary intrigues by which Pope Sixtus V. was hoodwinked as to English succession until it was too late for him to withdraw his promised support to the Armada, has been told by me else- where,^ and when at last the expedition failed, joy and contentment, rather than sorrow, were expressed 1 Introduction to the Calendar of Spanish State Papers, vol. iv. 14 TREASON AND PLOT by the Pope and cardinals at the Catholic defeat.^ For years Philip had endeavoured to keep in the background, even from his confidential agents, his political design to subjugate England to Spain ; but long before the Armada sailed the Scottish Catholics at the Vatican, jealous of their king's right to the English succession, the French car- dinals, apprehensive of a Spanish dominion over England, the Welsh priests, led by Owen Lewis, Bishop of Cassano, and most of the English seculars, Carthusians and Benedictines, none of whom had any love for the pushing Jesuits, were busy with plans that should make England a Catholic country without submitting her to a foreign yoke. When the Armada suffered catastrophe, the secret was out for all the world, and Philip could work in the dark no longer. Thenceforward it was evident that any direct attempt of his against England would probably meet with the open or covert opposition, not only of Protestants, but of the Papacy itself and of all Catholics but the Spaniards, the Jesuits, and the more extreme of Philip's English refugee pensioners ; for the Pagets, Morgan, Hesketh, the Treshams, and many others who had lived on his bounty, declined to sell their country for their mess of pottage. Whilst the death of Mary Stuart and the defeat of the Armada thus laid Philip's real designs open to the world, two other events shortly afterwards still further altered the possibilities of his action against England. The arrogant ambition of Guise, secure as he was of Spanish support and money, drove Henry HI. into * Spanish and Venetian Calendars, 1588-89. INTRODUCTORY 15 the arms of the Huguenots. The next heir to the French throne was Henry of Navarre, the Protestant prince, bound close in alliance and friendship with Elizabeth. If France and England became allied Protestant powers, then indeed were Spain and Catholic supremacy in Europe doomed ; and the danger to Philip in France was infinitely more pressing than in England. Money, support, and material aid were consequently forthcoming in plenty to enable the Holy League to crush the Huguenots once for all, though Spain and the Indies were bled almost to the last doubloon. Again circumstances tore away the screen behind which Philip always chose to fight. The screen in this instance was Guise's love of the Catholic Church; but the murder of Guise (December 1588) forced Philip into the open, and the assassination of Henry III. (August 1589) completed the ex- posure. Spain found herself in the position which for centuries she had avoided, namely, that of being at war with France with England also against her. It was a mere necessity of her continued existence as a great power that the Protestant faith should not be officially established in France ; and yet Philip dared not employ all his national resources in a war without ensuring some sort of stability for the objects for which he was making such great sacrifices. It was clear that the weakly ambitious and shifty Mayenne, the figure-head of the League now that his brother Guise was dead, could not be depended upon. Navarre would surrender no part of his birthright ; and the Spanish king was obliged to fight openly either for the Spanish domination 1 6 TREASON AND PLOT or the dismemberment of France. Henry IV. promptly seized the advantage that such a position gave to him, and assumed the sympathetic rdle of the patriotic champion opposed to the foreign sub- jection of his beloved country, whilst the League had to bear the reproach of fighting against the independence of France with the aid of Spanish pikes ; and Philip himself was forced again into the position he hated, namely, to appear to Christendom as an ambitious prince using religion as a cloak for his greed of territory. It will thus be seen that the words with which this chapter opened were justified. Up to the period which followed the defeat of the Armada, Philip, in his attempts to impose Catholic orthodoxy upon England, by diplomacy, by revolution, or by force, had figured as a devout sovereign bent only upon restoring religious unity to the world, and re- establishing the supremacy of the Church of which he was the divinely appointed champion. But from 1590 onward it was patent to everybody that his ultimate object was the political subjection of the country, in the interests of the Spanish monarchy, in which he would be opposed by most of Europe ; whilst it was equally obvious that the crusading zeal of his people, which had been a main source of his potency, had received a shock from which it was not likely to recover. The attempts, there- fore, of the Catholics to regain supremacy in England divide themselves into two distinct periods — the first, from the accession of Elizabeth to the end of 1589; and the second, from 1590 until the death of the Queen in 1603. The events of the former INTRODUCTORY 17 of these periods have been described fully and frequently : the participation of Mary Stuart in the various conspiracies for her benefit has been discussed ad nauseam; the Spanish intrigues to regain by any means, fair or foul, Philip's hold upon England are well known ; the efforts of the English Catholics themselves to impose their views upon Elizabeth and Cecil in the early years of the reign have been dealt with exhaustively ; ^ and the long series of juggles by which Elizabeth's marriage was utilised for similar ends have also been recently detailed." But the story of the final struggles for Catholic supremacy in the new set of circumstances which has just been explained from 1590 to 1603 has never yet been fully told by the light of modern research ; and it is the object of this book to set forth in some detail the abortive series of intrigues by which, during the last ten years of Elizabeth's reign, various sections of Catholics — English, Scot- tish, and Irish — endeavoured to avail themselves of foreign support for the objects they had in view. These intrigues were on more than one occasion in this period dangerously promising of success ; but the vigilance of the Queen's Government, the growing strength of the Protestant party in the country, the repugnance to Jesuit methods and to foreign domination on the part of most English Catholics, seculars, regulars, and laymen, together with the disillusionment and exhaustion of Sjjain and the wonderful good fortune of Elizabeth, ended ^ By Camden, Hollingshead, Froude, Lin^ard, the present writer (in the Spanish State Papers and Life of Burghley), and many others. 2 " The Courtships of Queeu Elizabeth,'' by Martin A. S. Hume. I) 1 8 TREASON AND PLOT by frustrating them all, and finally made England a Protestant country. The changed position of Philip towards England caused by the circumstances preceding the year 1590 was accompanied by a no less important variation in the attitude of Elizabeth's Govern- ment towards Spain. Drake and the newer school of seamen had always proclaimed, and had them- selves demonstrated, the hollowness of Spain's tra- ditional claim to overwhelming power. Seconded by the liberal, or Protestant, element in the English Council, they had never ceased to urge the Queen to cripple her foe, boldly and decisively, by means of large national operations against his own country or fleet. But they had against them the Queen's parsimony, Burghley's love of compromise, and the traditional dread and respect of Spain, England's ancient ally, which inspired the more conservative councillors of the Cecil party. The latter were content with the punishment inflicted on the Ar- mada and with the loss of prestige suffered by Spain, and were in favour of limitins^ their future operations to profitable sporadic attacks upon Span- ish commerce. The failure of the English attack upon Portugal in 1589, in the interest of the pre- tender, Don Antonio, was unjustly laid to the fault of Drake. In any case, the Queen was deeply ofi'ended at the result of the expedition, and for the rest of his life the great seaman lived some- what under a cloud ; whilst the cautious, old- fashioned statesmen endeavoured to avoid a renewal of the national war with Spain, and the more adventurous spirits were content to reap such ad- INTRODUCTORY 19 vantage as they might by plundering Spanish galleons and fighting the King of Spain under the banners of Henry of Navarre or the United Provinces. This unenterprising, indirect warfare gave to Philip the opportunity he so sorely needed of creating a navy of a more mobile type than he had previously possessed. It was seen that, for the purpose of attack or evasion, swiftness and handi- ness were his first desiderata ; and whilst his ports, both home and colonial, were relatively safe from attacks during Drake's disgrace, they were busy turning out vessels of a newer type with which the commerce of the Indies might be safely conducted ; and, when opportunity oflfered, England herself might be attacked.^ Fast sailing " galley-zabras," armed ^ That this was still Philip's ultimate object is seen from the instructions he gave to Commander Moreo, his representative to the Princes of the League (May 1589), Paris, MSS. National Archives, Spain, K. 1449:— "As tending also to the promotion of the Catholic faith, you will accept in the form which appears most convenient the offer made to me by the Duke of Mayenne to give me ports and other facilities for my Armada on the coasts of Normandy and Brittany to operate against England, with the power of drawing shiis, seamen, &c., for the Armada from those coasts." In September of the same year 1589 Mendoza wrote to Philip from Paris advocating the purchase of Boulogne from Epernon, who, he says, is willing to sell the place for 40,000 crowns ; or otherwise that it should be captured by force. He says : "With these two ports (Boulogne and Calais) at your Majesty's command, the enterprise (against England) could be effected very rapidly, even in the winter ; and at a very much smaller cost than the fitting out of a fresh Armada in Spain next summer or autumn." From Philip's cool reply to this it is evident that his eyes were still fixed upon Brittany, and that the collection of a Spanish fleet in Boulogne to attack England was no part of his plan at that time. In January 1590 Diego Maldonado sent an elaborate report to Philip with regard to the possibility of fitting out a fleet on tlie Brittany coast. This led to the seizure shortly afterwards of the port of Blavet, which continued to be the Spanish naval b ise in France until the signature of the peace of Vervins in 1 598 (Spanish Calendar). 20 TREASON AND PLOT treasure-ships, were built in Havana in considerable numbers. Lisbon, Cadiz, Santander, and Ferrol contributed galleons built from English and Flemish designs, and armed not infrequently by English bronze cannon smuggled into Spain by Scottish, German, and other ships.^ In the meanwhile hired squadrons of armed merchantmen were organised to protect the communications between Spain and Flanders by the Channel; and by the year 1592 Philip once more was in possession of a royal navy, less pretentious and splendid in appearance than the Armada, but much more effective for the service required of it.^ These preparations did not escape the notice of the English spies in Spain, or diminish in the telling; and periodical scares, with, as we see now, but small justification, kept English sailors on the alert for a possible descent upon the coasts of Great Britain ; the Spanish base upon the Brittany coast giving ever-present point to the alarm. Plawkins's great preparations in the winter of 1589 to attack the returning Indian treasure fleet were rendered useless because the Queen in a panic forbade the expedition from leaving the Channel. If Drake's and Kalegh's policy had been followed, the English fleet would have sailed to Corunna and have destroyed the Spanish naval ^ Richard Horton writes thus from Madrid, April 1591 (Hatfield Papers, part 4) : — " Aqui recibimos cada dia en quantidad artilleria de Ingleterra, por via de Lubeck, Einbden, Bremen, y Hamburgo ; y la llevan los mercaderes de alia sin sospecha con navois cargados con carbon. Todo hace el dinero I " 2 At the period in question (1592) there were 75 ships ready for sea in tlie King's service, of which 23 were fine new galleons of 700 to icxx) tons each ; besides 40 more of such galleons in course of con- struction (Ciirbett, " Drake and the Tudor Navy "). INTRODUCTORY 21 armaments there collected ; but the defensive and commerce -harrying tactics of the more cautious spirits prevailed, and the opportunity v^^as missed : the only result of the sailing of the fine English fleet under Havt^kins and Frobisher in 1590 being to frighten the treasure fleet of Spain into re- maining on the other side of the Atlantic all the vrinter. The English were, it is true, thus in com- plete command of the sea, and the detention of the treasure hampered Philip's progress ; but the timid policy that now prevailed in Elizabeth's council left his focus of activity untouched, and thus gave plausible ground for a renewal of the alarm which his preparations caused in England. The effect of the policy was seen in the following year, when Howard and the bulk of the English navy, cruising off the Azores to intercept the delayed Indian flotillas, was surprised by the appearance of a much stronger Spanish force under Bazan, of fifty-five ships with 7200 men, before which the English were forced to abandon their expected prey and seek safety in flight — all except the Revenge, in which Grenville rashly bade defiance to them all and went to voluntary destruction. Though Bazan's squadron suffered heavily from a storm on its way home, its strength partially convinced the English queen of the growing danger she had to fear from the reconstructed navy of Spain. But still, instead of striking at the root, Elizabeth and Burghley endea- voured to meet the danger, of which their spies constantly warned them, mainly by helping the French king to keep the Spanish forces fully occupied in France, and by urging Henry to special 2 2 TREASON AND PLOT activity in Brittany, where her own forces under Sir Henry Norreys were also fighting the League. The loss of the Revenge, too, and the failure of Howard to tackle Bazan's fleet, as well as the Queen's annoyance with the rash perverseness of Essex, now the leader of the Protestant or war party, gave to the Cecils and their adherents the upper hand ; and caution and plunder reigned supreme as a policy until the spring of 1593, when the rehabilitated naval power of Spain was too evident and threatening any longer to be trifled with. It is at this juncture that we propose to take up in detail the story of how the continued attempts to make Great Britain Catholic were met and frustrated. CHAPTEll II Intrigues of the Scottish Catholics with Spain — James's share in them — The "Spanish blanks" — 'Ihe Parliament of 1593 — Fears of a new- Spanish invasion — John Cecil's mission from Scotland to Spain^ The influence of Father Persons — 'I"he Spanish mission to the Scottish Catholic Lords — John Cecil's betrayal of the cause. As early as the end of 1586, whilst the preparations for the Armada were still far from complete, one of Philip's most able officers, Bernardino de Mendoza, sent to the King a most convincing state paper, strongly advising that England should not be attacked by a naval invasion, but by a force crossing the Scot- tish border ; and the dangers and difficulties which Mendoza foretold in the case of a direct attack by sea were precisely those which caused the failure of the attempt.^ The origin of this advice was the offer of the Earl of Huntly and the other Scottish Catholic Lords to secure and deliver to Spain two ports near the English border in which a Spanish force might be received ; and in return for Philip's support to the Catholic cause, they also professed their readiness to aid him with their own forces, and to compel James to become a Catholic." At that time, however, Philip's main plan of invasion was laid ; and although he sent money and fair words in plenty to the Scottish Lords, in order, at least, that ^ Mendoza to the King, December 24, 1586. Spanish Calendar, vol. iii. 2 Ibid. 23 24 TREASON AND PLOT James might be prevented from helping the English, he had long ago made up his mind that the King of Scots would be no fit instrument for him. The persistent intrigues of the Scottish and French Catholics, after the Armada, to bring about a com- promise founded upon the conformity of James to Catholicism — intrigues to which the King of Scots himself was usually a party — confirmed Philip's de- termination to exclude James altogether from his operations against England. Fortified by the opinions of the Jesuit party, voiced by Persons, he was con- vinced that the jealousy of Englishmen against the Scots would lead them to prefer even a Spaniard to a Scotsman as their king ; and the Pontifi" himself was lectured and rated like a schoolboy by the in- solent ambassador, Olivares, for his efi"orts to bring about a settlement ^ by means of the conciliatory policy of which the great majority of the English Catholics now approved. Philip, however, was still full of expressions of sympathy for the Scottish Catholics ; for, with the growing difficulty of a direct naval invasion of England, for reasons set forth in the last chapter, the possibility of having some of the ports of Scotland open to him, if he needed them, was a tempt- ing one. Huntly, Errol, Angus, and the rest of them, therefore still appealed to the Spanish King to aid their party ; and James played his tricky double game * See Olivares' letters to the King, in Spanish Calendar, vol. iii., in which the Pope is spoken of most disrespectfully, and details given of the ambassador's rudeness to him. To such an extent was this carried that, when Henry IV. 's approaches to the Pope and his desire to conform wwe benevolently listened to by Sixtus, not only did Olivares insult the Pope grossly, but Spanish friars denounced him as a. heretic (Tempesti, Vie de Sixtus V.). CATHOLIC SCOTS APPEAL TO SPAIN 25 of taking secret part in the Catholic conspiracies against his own Government, in order to keep both parties in hand. When, in 1589-90, he was obhged to content Elizabeth and the Protestants by going through the pretence of punishing the Catholic Lords whose accomplice he was, and, during his absence in Denmark, entered into negotiations for the for- mation of a great Protestant league of Scotland, England, the Northern Powers, and Henry IV. (who had not yet " gone to Mass "), the Scottish Catholics took fright in earnest, and sent a humble emissary, one Charles Boyd, to Spain to pray for Philip's assistance to a new confederation, which was evi- dently pledged to the removal of James, ^ As usual with him, Philip wanted "further information" before he would pledge himself to anything ; but this opening was more promising than previous approaches from the same quarter, as in this case it was evident that James himself was left out of the calculation. However this may be, Elizabeth's Government were fully informed of the plot, and whilst Boyd was still in Madrid awaiting Philip's answer, Elizabeth, in her own hand, thus wrote to James on his return to Scotland from his wedding- trip to Denmark in May 1590: "I hope you wyl not be careles of such practisis as hathe passed from any of yours without your commission, spetially such attempts as might ruin your realme and danger you. If any respect whatever make you neglect so ex- pedient a worke, I am affraide your careles heed will worke your unlooked danger." The Queen in- dignantly closes by saying that she knows her former 1 Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. p. 582. 26 TREASON AND PLOT letters of warning have been shown by James to the Catholics ; and if she sees her admonitions dis- regarded for the future, " I wil hireafter wische al well, but counsel no more at all." ^ James was not long before he again got his own hand into the plot. Scotland was now flooded by priests and Jesuits who had fled from the severity of Elizabeth's penal enactments or had been sent from abroad for missionary work," and they laboured on fertile soil in the discontent aroused, especially in the King and nobles, by the parliamentary establish- ment in 1592 of the Presbyterian Church Govern- ment. This time it was Lord Balgarys and Graham of Fentry who took the lead (for Huntly, by his recent unprovoked murder of young Murray, was extremely unpopular), and Balgarys openly defied the Presbyterj^^ But the ministers were strong in their numbers and in Elizabeth's support ; and the Catholic nobles, this time with the full co-operation of the King, decided to send to Spain an ambassador of more importance than Charles Boyd or Robert 1 Elizabeth to James, May 1590 (Camden Society). ^ Pope Clement VIII. liad recently sent James a present of 40,000 ducats by an envoy, promising him a regular subsidy of 10,000 ducats a month if he would protect the Catholics. ^ The Church Sessions obtained a warrant for Balgarys' arrest and had excommunicated certain persons who had dined in his house. The Sessions were gathered for the purpose of appointing a person to execute the warrant, when Balgarys went with his followers to the place of meeting and made all the ministers present beg his pardon and dine with him, they giving for tlie purpose the meal prepared for themselves, "which is usually very splendid." They had also to promise never to molest any one again on his account. " He had gone thither for the purpose of killing them all, but contented himself with their submission at the request of his clansmen who accompanied him " (Report of a Scottish Catholic emissary to Spain late in 1592). Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. JAMES VI. AND THE CATHOLICS 27 Bruce of Bemie/ The person chosen was George Ker, brother of Lord Newbottle, who carried many letters of recommendation from Catholic nobles, and, like Robert Bruce in 1586, three blank sheets signed and sealed by Huntly, Errol, and Angus respectively, which were to be filled up when he was safely out of reach of the Protestants. He was to ask for a body of 30,000 Spanish troops to be landed in Scotland, to join with 15,000 men pro- vided by the Catholic nobles ; the avowed purpose being the seizure of James and the establishment of the Catholic religion in Scotland and subsequently in England. Ker was caught," thanks to the vigilance of the English agents, and though his blanks told but little, under threat of torture the messenger was more communicative, and the story was divulged. But not all of it was made public ; for he carried with him a secret paper which, until our own day, has been hidden "to save his Majesty's honour." This extraordinary document is endorsed, "Copy of the Scotch King's instructions to Spain, which should have been sent by Powry Oge,^ but ^ Full details of the mission of Robert Bruce to Spain in 1 586 will be found in tbe Spanish Calendar, vol. iii. - He was actually apprehended by Andrew Knox, minister of Paisley, with a number of students of Glasgow University, at Cumray, a small island in the mouth of the Clyde, just as he was taking ship for Spain, on the 27th December 1592. The conspiracy, so called, of the " Spanish Blanks," has been vehemently denounced by many Scottish Catholics, and by the present Marcjuis of Huntly in his " Memorials of Aboyne," as a mystification got up by the Protestant party to discredit the Catholics. This contention will no longer hold water in view of the original document, transcribed by the present writer, in the Simancas Archives, and summarised in the Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. p. 603. and others in vol. iii. of the same Calendar. ^ This was Pury Ogilvie, to whose mission to Spain on behalf of James in 1 596 I shall have to refer in a subsequent chapter. 28 TREASON AND PLOT thereafter were concredit to Mr. George Ker, and withdrawn at his taking for the safety of his Majesty s ho7iour." It is in the form of a balanced statement of both sides of the question, such as Lord Biirghley was in the habit of making on all important subjects of discussion. " This enterprise is one of the greatest that ever was, since it is to conquer England, partly by foreign force, and partly by some amongst themselves. But since all great enterprises ought to be suddenly and resolutely prosecuted, this ought to be executed at furthest in harvest next." This is the statement of the case to be decided, and the arguments for and against are set forth with the wordy pedantry so dear to James. After reciting the readiness of preparations in Scotland, and the danger of Elizabeth's learning the secret if the execution is delayed, fear is expressed that in the meantime also Philip " might dip with her for his own particular, which, if it so fell out, would disappoint the whole enterprise." ^ The result of James's deliberation was, nevertheless, finally against present haste. "Wherefore my opinion is that it die down, as I said before. In the mean- time, I will deal with the Queen of England fair and pleasantly for my title to the crown of England after her decease, which thing, if she grant it, as it ^ The approaching reconciliation of Henry IV. to the Catholic Church made a rapprochement between Elizabeth and Philip distinctly probable at the time, and the air was full of rumours to that effect. If the Cecil party had been able to have their way an agreement would probably have been made. This would once more have grouped the powers on the old lines of national rather than religious interest, and the union of England and Scotland under James would then have been extremely unlikely. JAMES VI. AND THE CATHOLICS 29 is not impossible, however unlikely, we have then attained our design without stroke of sword." ^ This secret instruction gives us the key to James's other- wise incomprehensible action in the matter. The Catholic nobles had only told him half the truth, or less, and instead of making use of them, he was their dupe. It was not to gain the crown of England for him, so much as the control of affairs by the Catholic faction, that they sought Spanish aid. When the communications finally reached Philip, little indeed was heard of James's claim to the English crown, and much of the desire of the Catholic Earls to hold him prisoner as a tool of their party for the destruction of the Reformed doctrines in Scotland and England. The exposure of the plot by the capture of Ker and Fentry drove Huntly and his friends into open re- bellion ; but James, by his dour attitude towards the Protestants who had discovered the conspiracy, and his tenderness to the Catholic rebels, clearly demonstrated his annoyance at the frustration of his own crooked plans. Fentry, the least culpable of the conspirators, it is true, was executed ; but the power- ful Earls, who were far more guilty than their accom- plice, as James knew, were allowed to return to their strongholds unpunished. What Elizabeth thought of the tergiversation of the King of Scots, she her- self set forth in a vigorous autograph letter to him sent by the hand of her ambassador Bowes at the end of January 1593 : " AVonders and marvelles do so assail my conceatz, that the long-expected answer to matters of such waight as my last letter needs not seame strange. Yet suche I see the eminent ^ Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 215 30 TREASON AND PLOT danger and wel-ny ready approache of your state's ruin, your live's peril, and your neighbour's wrong, as I may not, to kepe you company, neglect what 1 should, though you forget that which you ought. I am sorry 1 am driven from warninge to heed, and from too much trust to seek a true way how your deeds, not your wordz, may make me assurance that you be no way guilty of your own decay and other danger. Receive therefore, in short, what course I mynd to hold. . . . Since you first breathed I re- garded alwais to conserve hit (^.e. her regard for him) as my womb hit had bine you bare. Yea ; I withstode the hands and helps of a mighty king to make you safe, even gained by the bloud of many my deare subjects' lives. I made myself the bul- wark betwixt you and harm, when many a wyle was invented to steale you from your land, and make other posses your soile. When your best strong- holds were in my handes, did I keep them'? Nay ; I both conserved them and rendered them to you. Could I endure that foreigners had a footing in your kingdom ? No ; I never left till all the Frenche that kept their lives parted from your soile. . . . Let me remember you how well I was thanked or he rewarded that once brought all the letters of those wicked conspirators of the Spanish faction, even the selfe-same that still to your eminent peril you have conserved in their estates. Was I not so much doubted as hit was thought to be an Italian inven- tion to make you holde me dearer, and contrived of malice not due by cause ? , . . See what encourage- ment I received for many wakeful cares for your safety. . . . Now of late, by fortunate good hap, a ELIZABETH'S INDIGNATION 31 lewd fellowe hathe been apprehended with lettars and instructions. I pray God he be so wel han- deled as he may confess all his knowledge in the Spanish conspiracie, and that you use not this man as slightly as you don the ringleaders of this treason. I vowe if you do not rake it to the bottome you wyl verefie what many a wise man hathe (viewing your proceedings) judged of your guiltiness of your own wreck ; with a whining that they wyl you no harme in enabling you with so rich a protector {i.e. as Spain) that wyl prove in the end a destroyer. I have beheld of late a strange dishonourable and dangerous pardon, which, if it be true, you have not only neglected yourself but wronged me. ... I require, therefore, to all this a resolute answer, which I challenge of right ; " and then the indig- nant Queen demands that sudden retribution shall fall upon the conspirators ; and ends with a semi- apology for the justified heat of her " too long skribling." ^ This letter was followed in a few wrecks by the despatch of Lord Borough to James from Elizabeth to urge him to decisive action against the Catholic Lords, instead of the make-believe pursuit of them which the King was undertaking;" and simul- taneously the Catholics sent a fresh envoy to inform Philip of all that had passed. Huntly and Bal- ^ Elizabeth to James (Camden Society). 2 James wrote to Elizabeth at this juncture (Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 296) promising her emphatically " tliat they never shall have dwell- ing under him who are guilty of so foul a treason, but the Queen's helpful hand must be had thereto." He tells her, however, that she is quite as much interested as he in excludini,' the Spaniards from Scotland. 32 TREASON AND PLOT garys, they told him, had compelled the burgh of Aberdeen to deliver to them the person of the Papal envoy, and that " seeing how little they can hope for from their King," they had employed the Pope's subsidy to pay their clansmen in arms.^ The two rival organisations of spies, serving the interests respectively of the Cecils and Essex, kept Elizabeth well informed of all these approaches to Spain. Colonel Sir William Semple was known to be resident in the Spanish court, always ready to urge the case of the Scottish Catholics, and the coming and going of the Scottish messengers were fully reported. The violent book just published by Persons against Elizabeth's government and spread broadcast over Europe, and the strong position held by Spain on the Brittany coast, joined with the Scottish intrigue in exciting alarm in England ; and this was still further exacerbated by the war party headed by Essex, who were for ever discovering or inventing fresh Spanish plots. The result of all this was a recrudescence of the severity against the recusant 1 In the same report (Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. p. 590) there is a curious account of a '' mii-aculous " victory by Huntly with 37 clans- men over Ar.Liyll with 1 500 soldiers, 500 of the latter beinL? killed, without the loss of a single man on the Catholic side. The victory is ascribed to the intervention of St. Laurence, Huntly having chosen that saint for his patron during the ensuing year (in accordance, it is asserted, with an old Scottish custom). Another miraculous story is told in the s:irae report about the Earl of Morton, who was a Caiholic, but had coni'ornied to the Presbyterian Churcli. When he was about to s\'j,n the Articles an angel appeared to him and foretold disaster to him if he did so. The Earl was alarmed, and "again put on a gold c'ucifix -ind an Agnus Dei" that he used to wear round his ut-ck. He allowed himselt sulisequently to be persuaded to sign the Articles ; and shortly afterwards in an att'ray with the Johiistones met witn tlie end the an^el had predicted, his right hand being smitten ott" liy Johnstone himself. THE PARLIAMENT OF 1593 33 English Catholics. No distinction was made be- tween those of the Jesuit party and the great mass of English Catholics, who were proud of the new potency of their country under the "wise government of Elizabeth, and would now have been content, as a last resource, with toleration for their faith. Uni- formity of doctrine and practice was made a test of loyalty, and both Catholics and Puritans equally felt the lash. The Cecil party had thus against them the extreme men on both sides, and resorted to rigid severity in order to hold the middle way. In this excited condition of aftairs in England it was necessary for a large sum of money to be spent to place the country into a state of defence. No Parliament had been held for four years, but the expenses of the wars in France and Holland, and her advances to Henry IV., had depleted Elizabeth's treasury, and a fervent appeal to the patriotism of the Commons had to be made in the spring of 1593. The Queen's speech was read by Lord Keeper Puckering. It sounds somewhat curious to modern ears, for the members were warned that it was " Her Majesty's pleasure that the time be not spent in devising and enacting new laws, the number of which are so great already as it rather burdeneth than easeth the subject; but the principal cause of this Parliament is that Her Majesty might consult with her subjects for the better withstandins: those intended invasions which are greater than ever before heard of. And where heretofore it hath been used that many delighted themselves in long orations, full of ver- bosity and vain ostentation, more than in speaking things of substance, the time that is precious should c 34 TREASON AND PLOT not be thus spent . . . and the good hours not be lost in idle speeches." "The Queen," he said, "was desirous of the advice of her loving people con- cerning the defence and preservation of herself, her realms and subjects, from the power and oppres- sion of a foreign enemy. This enemy was the King of Spain, whose malice was increased by his loss and shame received in 1588. His resolution was still to invade this kingdom, as plainly did appear by his building and getting together many ships of less bulk and better fitted for service in our seas than those greater galleons and galliasses were in 1588. That he desired some nearer place from vi^hence to invade England, and therefore at this time was labouring to plant himself in Brittany. He had also raised factions in Scotland and conspiracies against the King there, finding him an enemy to his ambitious designs ; " and Puckering, for the Queen, then reproached the Commons with the difficulty of collecting the supplies voted in past Parliaments, and urged them to liberality and a reformed inci- dence, so that the wealthy classes should pay their full share. ^ The Speaker (Coke), when his turn came, fully fell in with the Queen's humour, and scoifed at ''Elephantine Leges." Wherefore, to make more laws might seem superfluous, and he might ask, " Quid causa ut crescunt tot magna volumina legis ? " and answer, "In promptu causa est crescit in orbe malum," and much more to the same courtly effect. But when, according to custom, he prayed the Queen to grant her faithful Commons free speech, freedom from arrest, and access to her ' Digges, " The Proceedings in the Last Four Parliaments of Elizabeth." THE PARLIAMENT OF 1593 35 person, he got a very harsh and grudging answer ; for Elizabeth still remembered and resented the talk about the succession, which had offended her in the last Parliament. The Queen's formal reply to the address of the Commons struck the same note of defiance to Spain. " I fear not all his threatenings," she said ; " his great preparations and mighty forces do not stir me ; for though he cometh against me with a greater power than ever was his Invincible Navy, I doubt not, God assisting me, but that I shall be able to defeat and overthrow him. I have great advantage over him ; for my cause is just." She had heard, she continued, that certain English people resident on the coast had fled inland on the approach of the Armada, leaving their towns unprotected. " But I swear, by God, if I knew those persons, or any that shall do so hereafter, I will make them know and feel what it is to be so fearful in so urgent a cause." In the subsequent speeches in the House, the most was made of the Scottish intrigues with Spain ; and Sir Robert Cecil especially magnified the danger whilst praising to the skies the King of Scots' attitude. " The King of Spain's malice," he said, " thus daily increaseth against us, and seeketh also to stir up sedition amongst us by his instruments. The num- ber of Papists also daily increaseth, or, at leastwise, be more manifested." With only a dissenting voice from Francis Bacon, for which the Queen frowned upon him for many a day to come, a large subsidy was voted to cover four years' supply, and a fero- cious new set of penal laws was enacted against recusants and Catholics. But directly a few of the / 36 TREASON AND PLOT Puritan members dared to talk about the succession, they were incontinently clapped into prison, and the House was dissolved in a hurry. Ralegh's speech on the Spanish plans is inter- esting, as confirming the information then being constantly sent to Philip by his spies in England, namely, that the great fear of the English was of the new form of Spanish galleys. It will be recollected that the galleys in the Armada had broken down and failed utterly. And it is now generally seen that the day for galley warfare in the open sea had gone by ; but contemporaries had not yet fully mastered the fact. It was understood that mobility was the secret of success, ; and the new type of galley-zabra, which employed both sail and sweeps as needed, seemed to onlookers to provide this desideratum, together with a seaworthiness not pos- sessed by the old galleys.^ Ralegh, after setting forth the wide ramifications of Philip's activity, continued: "He (Philip) hath so corrupted the nobility in Scotland that he hath promised them forces to assist the Papists, that were ready to join with any foreign forces that would make them strong. ... In his own country (Spain) there is all possible preparing ; and he is coming with sixty galleys, besides other shipping, with purpose, if he goes forward and hath good success. We must then, if he invade us, have no ships riding at anchor, but all will be little enough to withstand him. At bis coming he fully resolved to get Plymouth, or at ^ Although huilt on <,'alley lines, these vessels were mainly for sailing ; but the piisses.sioii of sweeps greatly added to their eflectiveness in war. They uliinialely develnj)Ld into the frigate or cruiser. ALARM IN ENGLAND 37 least to possess some of the havens this summer within our land, and Plymouth is in most danger." And then Ralegh again advocated for the hundredth time the policy of Drake and the seamen to meet and defeat the enemy before he approached England. "Now the way to defeat him was this — to send a royal army and supplant him in Brittany, and to possess ourselves there ; and to send a strong navy to sea, and to lie with it on the Cape, and at San Lucar, to which places come all his ships with riches from all places ; and then we may set upon all that comes." How far the alarm expressed by the members of the Government of a direct Spanish invasion of England was real, it is difficult at this time to say. It was the fixed policy of the Essex party to keep alive distrust and hatred of Spain in order to pro- mote a decisive national war which should give final supremacy to the pronounced Protestant party. But at this juncture the Cecils and their friends were quite as alarmist as the Puritans. And yet Lord Burghley was perfectly well aware, from the reports of his spy, Chateau Martin, and others in Spain, that the naval preparations of Philip in the spring of 1593 could hardly be directed to an in- vasion of England.^ There were at that time twenty- ^ The pretext for the alarm was the numerous avowals of the priests and others captured of the preparations they had heard were being made in Spain for the invasion. Sir William Stanley, it appears, had been summoned to Spain to inspect the ships in Ferrol, of which he said there were thirty-six which were capable of beating the whole English navy. Stanley proclaimeil everywhere that he was to com- mand 10,000 troops for the expedition, and the landing was to take place in Lancashire or at Milford Haven ; and he boasted much, and perfectly without warrant, of the co-operation of his great kinsman the Earl of Derby, hinting also that Arabella Stuart was to be pro- 38 TREASON AND PLOT eight ships in Lisbon, Seville, &c., destined to go out and meet the Indian flotilla, for the purpose of protecting it on the voyage home. There was also a small squadron, unequipped, at Ferrol, and some other ships scattered in the Biscay ports, intended for the conveyance of reinforcements to Brittany or the south of France, There was, therefore, no pos- sibility of another Armada in that year ; and the expressed alarm of the Cecil party in Parliament, and the subsequent action of the Government, may be partly explained by a recommendation of Chateau Martin to Lord Burghley in April 1593. Writing from Bordeaux, he says that the best way to em- barrass the King of Spain's action, " et lui rendriez pour cette ann^e ses forces inutiles, qui serait un grand remede pour les aifaires d'ici" {i.e. France), will be to spread a rumour that Sir Francis Drake is going to attack Portugal, and the spy offers to use the " artifices " necessary for setting such a rumour afloat. " Mais il est besoin de faire quelque demon- stration d'y vouloir employer le dit Sieur Drac, parce'que d'un bruit seulement qui a couru en Espagne que sa Majestie (i.e. Elizabeth) I'emploiait, et qu'elle lui avait deja delivre ses commissions, I'Espagne en a ^te quelques jours en tres grande alarme ; dont il se peut juger ce que serait lorsque Ton y verrait quelque apparence." ^ claimed Queen. The attempt, he announced, was to be made in the spring of 1 593, " before which thej^ hoped to get Brest." No doubt this va])ouring on the part of Stanley was for the purpose of frighten- ing the English Government, and of forcing Philip on the course desired by the En^^lish zealots. This view is confirmed in " The State of the English Fugitives." (See also Reports of Spies in 1592 in State Papers, J^omestic, and Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. ' Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 307. EXAGGERATION OF THE ALARM 39 The fact is evident to ns now that Philip was in far more alarm of the possible attacks of English ships upon his treasure fleet, upon his Brittany garrisons, or upon his coasts and colonies, than the English had reason to be of him, so far as a direct invasion was concerned. Don Pedro Valdes, who was just ransomed from captivity in England (March 1593), wrote very apprehensively of the preparations in the English ports, and hazarded many guesses at the possible destination of the English ships.^ Philip had his hands more than full in France. He was old, ill, and weary ; and he had probably already decided in his own slow mind that his strength was insufficient, as it obviously was now, to repeat the supreme effort of the Armada and to attempt a direct invasion of England ; though, as usual, he kept his own counsel on the matter. It is likely that, so far as the Cecils were con- cerned at least, the scare in the English Parliament and public was deliberately exaggerated, in order that the supplies necessary for the continuance of the English aid to Henry IV. against the Spaniards in the north of France, and for counteracting the Catholic intrigues in Scotland, might be more libe- ^ Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. p. 596. Almost every letter at this period, also from the Venetian ambassador in Madrid to the Doge (Venetian Calendar), speaks of the fear inspired and the depredations committed by the large number of English privateers on the Spanish and Portuguese coasts ; and constant references are made as to the intention of the Spanish armaments being defensive. On the 4th April 1593 lie writes: "Although no re.ular fleet has sailed from England, yet thei-e are about fifty English ships in these waters. They are doing most serious damage every day, as the larger part of the Spanish ships are built by private individuals on the security of about six per cent, on all the goods brought by the Indian fleet." 40 TREASON AND PLOT rally forthcoming. In any case, notwithstanding the exciting speeches in Parliament, little was done in the matter of naval armament beyond the adop- tion of Chateau Martin's recommendation of spread- ing rumours of Drake's new commission for sea ; and Philip was even allowed to send large reinforce- ments to Brittany in the winter of 1593 without molestation from the English. This last event, however, reawakened the fears of the latter, and in the following spring a successful attack was made upon the threatening position of the Spaniards in Brest harbour and other Breton fortresses in Spanish hands. Chateau Martin, who was usually well informed, pointed out in April-May 1593 to Lord Burghley that Spanish intrigues in Scotland were still afoot. " lis esperent fort en Espagne une revolte en Ecosse. . . . Le roi d'Espagne a bonne envie d'y former un parti a sa devotion, et d'y aider avec les forces qu'il pourra, s'il y voit tant peu soit-il de fonde- ment." ^ Whilst this was being written, a more serious embassy than any that had preceded it was being sent from the Scottish Catholic Lords to Philip. The active intervention of the Jesuit priests in the Scottish Catholic conspiracy of 1581-82 had not been a success, and in the changed aspect of affairs since the failure of the Armada, the Company — as has been explained — continued to oppose any scheme for the settlement of English affairs which should lead to a compromise, or to the doubtful conversion of James Stuart. Either the Scottish Catholic nobles had now grown reckless, and knowing the jDrice to ' Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. FATHER CECIL SENT TO SPAIN 41 be paid for Spanish help to their cause, were pre- pared to pay it, or else they had satisfied themselves finally that Catholicism could never depend upon James, and they were determined to sacrifice him. In any case, their new departure was significant, as it brought them in line with the position to which the Jesuits had led Mary Stuart before her death, namely, to complete dependence upon Spain. One of the most able and energetic of Father Persons' recruits to his famous English College of St. Alban at Valladolid was John Cecil, a Master of Arts of Oxford, who in 1589 had been sent from Rome, apparently in consequence of the continued squabbles in the English Catholic College there. He had been despatched to England in the spring of 1 59 1, and had thence proceeded to Scotland, where he gained the confidence of Huntly, and, disguised as a soldier, was now entrusted with an important verbal embassy to Spain.^ The Catholic Lords had * The particulars of this extraordinary man's life up to this period may be gathered from his own letters, under the name of Snowden, at Hatfield, and from the intercepted or stolen letters from Father Persons, respectively to Dr. Barrett and to Cecil himself, also at Hat- field. Although he had been ordained some time before in Rome, and was of mature age, he with others were sent for a year's probation to Valladolid, to prepare, under the direction of Persons, for the English Mission. Persons was very anxious to promote the prosperity of his College, and strove thus to attract zealous men to it, in order that its fame might be spread ; and he gives to Dr. Barrett a glowing account of these missionaries when they were on the point of leaving for England (Hatfield Papers, vol. v. p. 69). Fathei's Younger, Blunt, Dudley, Lockwood, Rooke, Salloway, Walford, and Almond were sent to England from various Spanish ports (1591), Cecil and Fixer, to whom a special political mission was given, being despatched from Lisbon. This mission was no other than to sound Lord Derby and his son as to their willingness to accept the Pretendership to the English crown. Father Persons' instructions to them whilst they were still at Lisbon are now at Hatfield, having been doubtless handed 42 TREASON AND PLOT been detected on each occasion that they had sent either written communications or blanks to Spain. Eobert Bruce, too, had played them false and be- trayed their secrets, and on this occasion, at Whit- suntide 1593, "the disguised one," as they called Cecil, carried his intelligence in his head instead of in his wallet ; bearing only a pre-arranged token of confidence to his old rector at Valladolid, Robert Persons, who, it was known in Scotland, was Philip's principal guide in the affairs of England. Ruffling in doublet and trunks, with a great Flemish rapier on his thigh, " a strange garb for his profession," as he says, Cecil came to Valladolid in July 1 593, and, having told his story to Persons, was instructed to draw up a statement of his mission in writing for submission to the King. The document is an in- structive one, because, amongst other things, it explains why Father Persons had suddenly^ been to Lord Burghley ou their arrival, as both Cecil (under the name of Snowden) and Fixer offered their services to him as spies at once. Cecil appears to have gone to Lancashire and thence to Scotland, but does not seem to have had any information to give to his namesakes at that time, for the honourable reasons .uiven in his Snowden letters to Cecil, though he bore a token from them which proved that he was secretly in their interests (Hatfield Papers, vol. iv.). There is also a most unflattering contemporary account of Cecil in Cardinal Vaughan's Archives at Westminster (vol. viii. p. 71). He was subsequently one of the most active appellants against the Archpriest's authority in Eng- land, to which controversy a further rfference will be made on a subse- quent page. Although he had entered the Jesuit College at Valladolid, it is evident that Cecil continued to share the repugnance of most of the English scholars in Rome to the Jesuit teacliings and methods. ^ According to Dingley's confession (State Papers, Domestic, August 1592), Sir W illiam Stanley had been toid by Persons, when he was in Spain in the previous year, that " the King had at last yielded to his (Persons') advice to attempt first against England." This refers to the proposed descent on the Lancashire coast, which, as I have already pointed out, could never have been seriously entered upon in 1592, SCOTTISH INTRIGUES IN SPAIN 43 brought to smile on the Scottish project. Cecil gives a long account of events in Scotland following on the abortive mission of Ker, and states, for the guidance of the Spanish King, how all the nobles and country stand afiected to the cause, both in the Highlands and the Lowlands. There is much abuse of the ministers and other Protestants, who are said to be unpopular and in a minority, and Philip is assured that " the nobles and people are sick of this tyranny and are yearning for a remedy, and they look to his Majesty {i.e. Philip) for his help to restore the Catholic faith." James is re- presented — truly enough — as weak, mean, and untrustworthy, possessing " no religion or fixed purpose ; " and it is evident all through that this plot, at all events, was being conducted over the Scottish King's head. The demands of the Catho- lics was that 3000 foot-soldiers should be sent from Spain or Brittany, arms for as many more, and stores for two months. They were assured a safe harbour and a welcome in Lochryan ; and a sum of 100,000 ducats was requested for the payment of the Scottish clansmen. The plan was at once to seize the King and capture Edinburgh and Glasgow, *' which they think will be very easy." " They especially as Lord Derby was not even sounded as to his co-operation — without which a descent upon his country would have been lolly — until late in 1593. The fate of the unhappy Ricliard Hesketh, when he did broach the subject to the Earl, conclusively pruved to all concerned that Sir William Stanley had made too free with his great kinsman's name. Whatever Persons may have thought, even thing tends to show that Philip had by this time lost hoi^e of conquering England by an attack on the coast, t'uough he would naturally en- deavour to secure a diversion by a feint attack by sea, and by arousing the English Catholics to co-operate with his attack from Scotland. 44 TREASON AND PLOT would then reduce the rest of Scotland, and expel or capture the principal heretics, and fortify the castles, which are all now utterly unprovided. After this they would make ready to resist the forces of England." They recommended, too, that the traitor Sir William Stanley should be sent with his regi- ment of Irish and English Catholics from Flanders, and a diversion is also suggested by a simultaneous descent of the rebel Earl of Westmorland and Lord Dacre on the east coast of Scotland at Lord Seton's port near Leith, All this had been offered to Philip before, and had met with no ready re- sponse. But there was this difference on this occasion, that instead of suggesting, as before, that James might be forced or persuaded to hecome a Catholic, Father Cecil says : " Finally, these gentle- men are sure that, with his Majesty's help, they will capture the King at once, and will deal with him as his Majesty orders." ^ Persons sent "the disguised one" with his state- ment to see Idiaquez, the King's secretary. " He is a good man," he tells him, " who has suffered for the cause, and full credit may be given to him." "With regard to the special business about which he comes," the writer reminds Idiaquez, "I have fre- quently said that Scottish and English affairs might advantageously be taken in hand jointly. The difficulties ivhich have previously presented them- selves to this will he solved by the message of this pi^iest." And then Father Persons grows quite enthusiastic about the " plan," which, he says, will trouble Elizabeth more than anything else in the 1 Spaiiisli Calendar, vol. iv. THE JESUITS AND SCOTLAND 45 world. We shall not be wronging the memory of Father Persons by suggesting that his sudden liking for the Scottish Catholics' plan ^ arose from the fact that their amended programme was intended to shut the door for ever to the Scottish domination of England, and to the doubtful " conversion " of James Stuart. Father Cecil saw Idiaquez at night in Madrid, and pressed him to move Philip to send the expedition in the ensuing winter ; but no rapid 1 Persons had been ceaseless in his ellbrts to frustrate any plan emanating from the Scottish Catholic party, or intended to get English affairs out of the hands of the Jesuits. The Carthusians had been specially active in seeking a modus vivendi for English Catholics, and had gained the powerful support of the Duke of h^avoy and his wife, the Infanta Catharine, Philiij's second daughter. They sent the Car- thusian prior, Dr. Arnold, to Madrid in 1589 to enli.st Philip in a proposal to work in Scotland through Chisholm, the Carthusian Bishop of Dunblane, and his nephew, the Bishop of Vaison. They professed to be able to bring James to the side of Spain, by force if necessary, and to kill the Chancellor, Maitland. 'llie Bi^hop of Cassano (Owen Lewis), and the other non-Jesuit English and Scottish priests in Italy and France, were at the bottom of the intrigue, which included the obtaining of a cardinal's hat for Lewis and tlie sending of Savoy and his wife to Flanders instead of Parma, giving them the management of the English plans. This would have checkmated the Jesuits entirely, and it is not surprising that Persons promptly upset the plan by persuading Pliilip that the only person who would benefit would be James. At a somewhat later date a more promising plan with a similar object was nearly successful, as it had the active approval of Allen, and most of the English malcontents in Flanders. The pro- posal on this occasion was to replace Parma in the government of Flanders by the extreme Catholic J)uchess of Feria, an Englishwoman, who would direct the English Mission from Brussels. Persons frus- trated this plan also, violently denouncing it as a plot devised by Thomas Morgan and the English Government, which it certainly was not. As a result, Morgan was imprisoned in Brussels as a spy, and was not released until after Parma's death. The priest Dingley, in his confession when captured in England (1592), said, " Per-ons is re illy the only man to be feared by England, for he travailleth the King so constantly. If Persons were removed there would be no more trouble." (See Spanish Calendar, vol. iv., and State Papers, Domestic, 1592.) 46 TREASON AND PLOT decision could be obtained from the slow-moving old recluse, whose " leaden foot " allowed every oppor- tunity to Heet past him uncaught ; and Father Cecil, pray as he might, was not sent back until the winter. Persons, who knew the King's mode of pro- ceeding, suggested from the first that, if more information was needed, a confidential person speaking English should be sent back with Cecil to Scotland, to report on his return the true condi- tion of afi'airs. Persons suggested William Boden- ham, a member of a well-known Catholic English family settled in Seville ; but his suggestion for some reason was not adopted. There happened, however, to be in Madrid at the time one William Eandall, a native of Weymouth, who had long been settled in Philip's town of Dunkirk, there busying himself mainly in the conveyance of priests and Catholics backwards and forwards from England to the Continent. He was a skilful old pilot, who knew every creek on the south and east coasts of England ; and when the English and Huguenot ships were together in Dieppe harbour in 1591, at the time that Henry IV. and Essex were be- sieainsf Rouen, Randall was the main worker in the plot to burn the combined fleets by " poisoned fireballs," the compounding of which he had learnt from "a lame old villain " at Dunkirk. His services had been enlisted in this plot by the little group of extreme English exiles in Flanders who favoured the policy of personal violence, namely, the Jesuits Holt and Archer, Sir W. Stanley, Captain Jaques, and their accomplices, and it is probable that Randall's visit to Madrid in the summer of 1593 FATHER CECIL'S RETURN 47 was for the purpose of forwarding in some way the views of this section. At all events, it was he who was deputed to accompany Father Cecil and a Spanish officer named Forres to the west of Scotland, in order to report respectively on the harbour accommodation offered to Fhilip, and the military resources of the Catholic nobles, to whom assurances of Spanish aid were sent by Cecil and Forres on condition of their keeping in arms against the Pro- testants. The envoys sailed from Spain in a Breton barque, and appear to have been accompanied by three missioners from the College at Valladolid. The barque was beset by tempests in the Channel, and forced to take refuge in Flymouth Harbour, in January 1594. This was indeed running into the lion's mouth, for Sir Francis Drake himself was in command of the town, and he had a short way with Spanish emissaries who fell into his hands. What became of the missioners we know not; pro- bably, like others of their kind by scores, they languished and died in prison ; but Father Cecil, who travelled as a Scotsman, was able to satisfy Drake and his colleagues that he was known and trusted by his powerful namesake in Loudon, and both he and Randall were separated from their companions, and kept in private custody until orders came from London. Cecil was then allowed quietly to go on his way, with the Spanish officer as his servant, whilst William Randall, who was kept in ignorance still of Cecil's real character, was sent to the Gatehouse prison, hard by the Abbey of W^estminster, there by slow degrees to have his black secrets wrung out of him by the rack and 48 TREASON AND PLOT the ingenuity of the amiable Topcliffe, and so dis- appears from the scene. It will be noticed that every step in each conspiracy was perfectly known to the English Government as it was taken ; and Father Cecil, with the Spaniard Porres, met the Scottish nobles with the full connivance of Elizabeth's Ministers, who had been informed weeks before that Ilnntly, Errol, and Angus had made their peace with James, and had promised him to submit to the Kirk.^ Thus, at this juncture, Elizabeth was far better informed than James, and she kept in her hands the thread of the intrigue, of the true object of which he was in ignorance. The scathing letter she sent to him by the hand of Lord Zouche, in reply to James's intimation that he had become reconciled to the Earls,^' therefore assumes for us a deeper meaning than it had before. "To see so much," she begins, " I rue my sight, that views the spectacle of a seduced king, an abusing council, and a wry-guided kinijdom. I doubt whether shame or sorrow had the upper hand when I read your last lines to me. . . . There is no prince alive, but if he show fear or yielding, shall have tutors enough, though he be out of minority. And when I remember what sore punishment those lewd traitors should have, then I read again, lest at first I mistook your mind. But when the reviewing granted my lecture true, Lord ! what wonder grew in me that you should correct them with benefits who deserve much severer cor- rection. Could you please them more than save their lives and make them shun the place they 1 James's letter to Elizabetli, December 7, 1 593 (Camden Society). 2 Pi'iiited in extenso in 'I'ytler's " History of Scotland." FATHER CECIL IN SCOTLAND 49 hate (i.e. the Court) . . . and yet as much enjoy their honours and livelihood as if for sporting travel they were licensed to visit other countries? Call you this banishment ! — to be rid of those whom we fear and let them go to those they love? Now when my eyes read more, then smiled I to see how childish, foolish, and witless an excuse the best of either three made you ! with their items ! of expenses, lacking but one billet, which they best deserved, an item for so much for the cord whose office they best merited. ... I never heard a more deriding scorn ; and I vow that if but this alone, were I you, they should learn a short lesson. For your own sake play the king, and let your subjects see you respect yourself, neither to hide or to suffer danger or dishonour." But in her letter Elizabeth said nothing to indicate her knowledge that, even as she wrote, the Scottish Catholic Earls were pledging themselves to Cecil and Porres to take up arms again, and hand the two realms over to the Spaniards ; for what she wanted to learn was whether James the Shifty had managed again to introduce his own finger into the pasty. It behoved her to watch him carefully, for a powerful Scottish- Spanish force crossing her northern border, where Catholicism was strongest, might well mean the destruction of her glorious life-work and of Pro- testant England. What she with all her keenness failed to see, because she could not follow Philip's mind as we can who have his secret papers before us, was that the moment James himself joined in the Catholic plans, all danger to England from Spain over the Scottish Border disappeared. D CHAPTER III Appeal to Spain of the Irish Catholics — Meeting of the Chiefs in Donegal — The Archbishop of Tuam's mission to Spain — James sends another envoy to Spain — The battle of Glenlivat — Walter Lindsay in Madrid — Suppression of the Catholic Lords in Scot- land—Their renewed appeal to Philip — Its failure, and the reason for it. Whilst the intrigue described in the last chapter was in progress, with the intention of bringing Catholicism and the Spanish subjection of England across the Scottish Border, a far more promising plan was ripening elsewhere. The constant efforts of the whole of the Catholic elements in Europe, except the Spanish Jesuitical party, to discover a solution of the difficulty by the conversion of James Stuart ; and the insincere coquetting of the King of Scots with both sides, had made Philip, with the Jesuit Persons at his ear, distrustful and reluc- tant to accept any plan for the English subjection which depended upon Scottish pledges. We have seen that his doubts were only partly overcome when the King of Scots himself was entirely ex- cluded from the conspiracy ; and we shall have occasion to remark that Philip again cooled towards the Scottish plans as soon as James had once more wormed himself into the heart of the Catholic intrigue. But no such misgivings assailed Philip the Prudent's mind with regard to Ireland. There THE IRISH CATHOLICS 51 there was no king finessing to obtain the reversion of the English crown, no large native Protestant element to dispute for the Government if once the English garrisons were overcome. The English were practically supreme only within their Pale and in the walled cities ; and the introduction of the English, as opposed to the native Irish, rule of succession had caused the existence of at least two claimants to nearly every great estate and chieftain- ship. This, whilst it gave rise to perpetual weaken- ing tribal warfare, and secured to the English the adherence of at least some members of each of the princely families, with their sub-lords and following, who w^ere glad to have their lands confirmed to them by the English crown, provided also a rallying point to native discontent to those who claimed and held their lands by old traditional tenures which every Irish kern understood. The hand of the old Irish chieftain had been sorely hard upon his tenants and under-lords, but at least he stood in the newer order of things under Elizabeth, for Irish feeling and tradition, and for the Irish Catholic faith, against foreign governors, whose rule might and did mean greater material pros- perity, security, and independence for each indi- vidual, but who, after all, were not Irishmen and not Catholics. The Munster rising in 1579-80 had clustered around such a feeling as this when it was voiced by James Fitzmaurice-Fitzgerald. At that time Philip had not decided upon open war with Eliza- beth, and the aid he sent to the rebels was timid and tardy, intended to embarrass Elizabeth, not to 52 TREASON AND PLOT dominate Ireland. The intervention of foreigners on that occasion was Papal rather than Spanish, and it was mainly the Nuncio's prayers and Dr. Sanders' religious enthusiasm that drew Philip into the matter at all.^ In any case, the whole Papal force was slaughtered, and the last Desmond rebellion was suffocated in blood. The boy-son of the un- happy Earl, who had been dragged into the rising against his own interests, was being bred up a prisoner in the Tower of London, and the Catholic kin of James Fitzmaurice were living on the bounty of Philip in Lisbon, whilst the broad domain of the Geraldines was forfeit to the crown of England. Thus matters in Ireland remained until 1592. The English-bred Earl of Tyrone had held his chief- tainship of Ulster under the Queen for some years, quarrelling occasionally with his neighbours and vassals — sometimes even bickering with the Vice- roy — but holding the north fairly peaceful without much interference." But in 1592 relations were be- coming strained. Tyrone had become too masterful to remain either a good neighbour or a good vassal, and constant complaints were heard against him. His young son-in-law, Hugh Roe O'Donnell, heir of the great chief of Tyrconnel, was a prisoner in Dublin Castle for his turbulence, and Tyrone made suit almost fiercely for his liberation, but without 1 For proof of this see original letters in British Museum, MSS. Add. 28,420, and Spanisli Calendai-, vols. ii. and iii. 2 It should be noted that Tyrone had no right to the chieftainship other than the Queen's grant. Tirlough Lenogh O'Neil was the chief- tain under the Irish rule, and was recognised as such. The son of Shan O'Neil, who had a better title to succeed to the chieftainship than Tyrone after the death of Tirlough, was killed by Tyrone, O'DONNELL THE RED S3 effect. In the summer of 1592 O'Donnell succeeded in escaping from prison and hurried down to his country of Donegal, where he took upon himself the chieftainship, notwithstanding the fact that his father was still alive. Leading his clansmen against the English force that occupied his lands, he drove them out with considerable loss, and then stood upon the defensive. In vain the Viceroy threatened and remonstrated ; in vain the Queen herself wrote to Tyrone warning him that he must keep his warlike son-in-law in order or punishment would fall upon them both. O'Donnell the Red stood his ground and defied the Government. Tyrone knew the English better than O'Donnell did, and was less hot-headed. He was not ready yet to brave the whole force that England could send, and began cautiously to cast about for allies whilst professing lip-service to the Queen. Macguire of Fermanagh, Avho claimed his lands by the Irish law, had defied the Viceroy to displace him. MacMahon of Monaghan was in similar case. Brian O'Rourke of Connaught — he of the Battleaxes — Oxford scholar though he was, was discontented because Elizabeth refused to confirm him as successor to his father — that fine old chieftain, Brian of the Ramparts, whom James of Scotland had dishonourably surrendered to Elizabeth only a year or two before, to be hanged and ripped on Tyburn tree. So, as will be seen, there was plenty of discontent upon which to work in the north of Ireland. During the depth of the winter of 1592, when the English troops were snug in their canton- ments, the chiefs of the north and west met in 54 TREASON AND PLOT conference with seven Irish Catholic bishops, upon one of whom, M'Gavrau, Archbishop of Armagh, the Pope had just conferred the Primacy of the Irish Church. There, in the wilds of misty Donegal, for three days much eloquence and fervour were ex- pended, and vague hopes were counted upon as certainties. We know thus much, though no report exists of the meeting, because a spy of Bingham brought him the news,^ and we can see now, as Bingham could not, how much was true and how much was otherwise. " They have made some great dispatch of certain letters which shall be sent out of hand by Bishop O'Healy (of Tuam) to the Pope and the King of Spain." This much was true, but the new Primate must have drawn strongly upon his imagination if he vouched for the further information attributed to him, namely, that he had accompanied the King of Spain into France^ with ^ State Papers, Irish, January 1593. Sir G. Bingham to Sir K. Bingham. - Archbishop M'Gavran had recently come from Rome by way of Spain ; he was accompanied by another Irish bishop, Cornelius O'Neil of Killaloe, who remained at Lisbon. Whilst tlie Arciibishop w;is staying in Madrid (June 1 591) the suggestion of an expedition from Ferrol against England, to which reference has already been made on page 37, appears to have been under discussion. The lihh regiment under Sir William Stanley was to have had a larije share in the busi- ness, and the Archbishop appears to have thought that the liberation of Ireland was one of its objects. Writing to Captain Eustace in Flanders from Madrid in June 1591 he says, " I hope in God it will not be long ere we be discharged and delivered from the cruelty of those people {i.e. the Saxons). And although the clergy upon further con- sideration have let (i.e. hindered) the Catholic King about ihese busi- nesses, I doubt not but the people and soldiers that were disposed to succour that poor island, so long time in thraldom, will be ready ere long." He speaks of Philip and his officers as being slow, and says that a Spaniard is to have supreme command of the expedition (Hatfield Papers, vol. iv.). In previous jmges I have shown how unlikely it was THE MEETING AT DONEGAL SS his daughter, the Infanta, who was to be married to the Duke of Guise. Also " that the King of Spain had determined to send two armies next summer, the one to England, the other to Ireland. The army for Ireland should come by Scotland and land in the north (of Ireland) ; but their (i.e. the Spaniards) only want was to have some great man to be, as it were, their leader or general, and they have now thought that Hugh Roe O'Donnell would be the fittest man." Alas ! for Irish hopes. Philip 11. was not in the habit of making up his mind thus rapidly. His thirst for information and for pledges binding others before he bound himself meant many weary voyages backwards and forwards for years to come, and Irish hopes, sanguine as ever, were doomed to many dis- appointments before armies and fleets were possible. It was, moreover, as we have seen, by no means easy for Philip, overburdened with debt and demands as he was, to muster and provision large forces in a poverty-stricken country like Spain, almost without roads and cursed with such a cumbrous administra- tion as his. If the alarmist reports of Irish spies were to be believed, the whole matter was settled, and a powerful invasion of England by Spain was already being prepared on the first cry for help from the Ulster chiefs. This, as we know now, was far from being the case, and we must turn to the State Papers at Simancas to see what really happened. Archbishop O'Healy does not appear to have that the preparations in Ferrol in 1592 were ever seriously intended by Philip for an attack in force upon England, although it was his policy to keep the English in alarm by pretending that it was, and the vapour- ing of Stanley and the Irishmen in Flanders was doubtless encouraged, to cjive additional strength to the rumour. 56 TREASON AND PLOT sailed from Ireland until the beginning of April, and probably went first to Rome, as he did not arrive in Madrid before August 1593.^ The note of his mission is struck by a letter he carried from O'Donnell to the exiled Geraldines, Viscount Baltin- glas, and other Irish Catholics in Lisbon.^ The letter was forwarded to the exiles on the arrival of the Archbishop in Madrid, and runs thus : — "Donegal, 8th April 1593. — You will have heard, my dear friends, how I have contrived to escape the jail and fetters in which I lay ; and how, after great travail and difficulty, I came to my own lands, where I found an English personage, a minister of the Queen, Avith many soldiers, whom, by the divine grace, I have killed and cast out of my land in a very short time, and the English have returned no more ; not for want of will to destroy me and do all the harm they can. But I, and the others who joined with me, although we are doing the best we can to defend ourselves, can hardly hold out against the great power of England, unless we get help ' It is curious, as showing the duplicity of Tyrone, and the equally sanguine and unfounded hopes of prompt S2:)anish aid being sent, that the earl, writing to the Lord-Deputy of Ireland in May 1593 (two months before the Archbishojj of Tuam even arrived in Madrid), informs him, as one of the reasons for not meeting the Lord-Deputy as requested, that " The traitorous bishops have assured upon letters which some have lately received, that the Spaniards will be here by the 20th July at farthest, and so they give out, with every show of joy" (Irish State Papers, May 1593). 2 Standin, an English Catholic in the Spanish service, who became a spy-aj,'ent for Essex, wrote that a week before he left Madrid in April 1593, Baltinglas and John of Desmond, with eight Irish follow- ers, had arrived there I'rom Lisbon, presumably to ur^ie Philip to in- tervene in Ireland. A man from Ireland was known to have been closeted with the King a few weeks before, and it was suggested, though questioned, that he had offered to l)etray to the Sjjaniards the town of Galway (Birch). IRISH MISSION TO SPAIN 57 from his Catholic Majesty. With the common consent of them all, therefore, we have thought well to send the Archbishop of Tiiam (much as we need him here) to treat with his Majesty of this, and to carry to you, gentlemen, who are there, our letters, begging you all to come and help us to fight God's battle, and win back our lands. It is meet that we should understand each other well, and help one another in this matter. I myself will do my part to the death, with the help of the succour I hope from his Majesty, and with your presence and help. God be with ye ; and, pray, hurry the Archbishop back with an answer. From Donegal, this 8th April 1593.— Ardh. O'Donnaill." ' This letter reached Lisbon on the 3rd September, and on the following day the courier was speeding back again to Madrid with fervent letters from Sir Maurice Fitzgerald" and the Bishop of Killaloe to the King of Spain, beseeching him to send aid to the Catholics of Ireland. That of the Irish exiled gentleman is worth transcribing. "Maurice Geral- dine, heir of the Earl of Desmond, and the other Irish gentlemen in your Majesty's service here, have received letters by the xVrchbishop of Tuam, who is now in your Majesty's court, from the most power- ful Catholics in Ireland, saying that they are con- certing a war against the Queen of England, and they beg us to supplicate your Majesty to send them succour with the utmost possible speed. We know that these gentlemen are Catholics, and are at the present time the most powerful people in Ireland ; ^ Simancas MSS., Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. 2 Sir Maurice Fitzgerald and Sir Thomas Fitzgerald had been salaried officers, unattached, on the Armada. 58 TREASON AND PLOT and seeing that they voluntarily risk their lives to serve God and your Majesty, we have decided to beseech your Majesty, for the love of God, and with the utmost earnestness of which we are cap- able, to favour us all by looking down upon their need and sending them such aid as may be con- sidered advisable. We also beg to be allowed to go with it, to defend and support the enterprise ; and we trust, with the divine favour, that your Majesty will be victorious, and coriquer for yourself the realm of Ireland, and then hy this means enter into England. It would be a great pity for these gentlemen to be lost for lack of succour, as the Earl of Desmond was when he rose like these. We trust in God that your Majesty will consider well the advantage that will ensue to Christendom from this business. The conjuncture is favourable, the cause is just, and all are disposed to do good service. If promptness be displayed, the Queen must withdraw the contingents she keeps in Flan- ders and France, and there will be fewer English- men on the coasts of Spain. We humbly beg your Majesty to favour the enterprise. We ourselves are ready to do anything. — Lisbon, 4th September. Don Maurice Geraldine." Before this, and a similar letter from the Bishop of Killaloe,^ who was also in Lisbon, arrived in Madrid, the Archbishop had gone through the usual process of sifting from the King's secretary, Don Juan de Idiaquez, in order that the latter might discover, for his master's guidance, how much " foundation," as he was wont to call it, there ^ This bishop, Cornelius O'Neil, had saved and forwarded to Scotland many of the men wrecked from the Armada on the Irish coast. IRISH MISSION TO SPAIN 59 was in the Irish revolt. It must be noted that not a word is said throughout the Archbishop's docu- ments about Tyrone. He was working still in the background ; and in the statement finally handed by the Archbishop to Philip II. the revolted nobles are named as O'Donnell, Macguire, and Brian O'Rourke. The Archbishop in his conference with the King ascribed to himself the principal merit of the rising. "For years past," he said, " he had used great efforts both publicly and privately to unite the Catholics of Ireland, with the object of their taking up arms for the faith, and in your Majesty's service, against the English heretics. His enterprise has succeeded, and the most powerful chiefs of the north of Ireland have now agreed, and have risen against the Queen, with the tacit consent of many other Catholics, who would like to do the same." He then prayed that prompt Spanish aid should be sent. " The gentle- men who had risen," he assured the King, " have in their territories good harbours and troops at their command, and any help sent to them would render the Queen of England powerless for harm. O'Donnell, he told Philip, had sixty Irish miles of land on the sea-coast, with splendid harbours capable of sheltering the greatest navies afloat. He could raise 3000 men of his own vassals, and his kinsmen in Scotland would help him with more. Macguire had forty miles of land, and could raise 2000 of his kerns, whilst Bernard (i.e. Brian) O'Rourke, " whose father on his way to Scotland for help was unfortunately captured by the English and decapitated,"^ could "raise 1000 men, and no ' It was decidedly cool of young Brian of the Battleaxes to make 6o TREASON AND PLOT more, because the English after killing his father had devastated his lands. The lands of the three chiefs together can furnish 600 horse." But the Arch- bishop seems to have attached most importance to the raising of Munster by the two exiled Geral- dines, Maurice and Thomas, in Philip's pay, and a similar call to arms of Leinster on the part of Viscount Baltinglas and Sir Charles O'Connor, who were also pensioned exiles in Spain ; " and this would be easy with but few men, as the country is easily defensible, and particularly one valley, which a few soldiers could hold against the world," The Burkes of Connaught, too, the sanguine Archbishop thought, would supply 1000 men to the combined forces : " and finally, nearly all Irishmen are against the English, and wish to get rid of such evil neighbours." The armed contingent requested was from 5000 to 10,000 soldiers, as many as possible ; and the chiefs promised to welcome them with at least 6000 Irish foot and 600 horse. When the Archbishop left the King's chamber from the conference this is what Philip scrawled, in that appalling hand of his, on a note attached to the Irish letters and statements. The note was to the secretary Idiaquez — "Here are the letters and notes that the Irish Archbishop has just given me. And if what they say is true it would be a great pity not to help them. What they demand in one of the letters is very much, and would be so if it were less than it is. You (Idiaquez) talk to this a subject for grievance. He wrote to the Privy Council (April 3, 1592) only a year before saying that his father had been fittingly punished for his fractiousness. Brian's real grievance, like that of Macguire, was that Elizabeth liesitated to confirm his chieftainship. PHILIP AND THE IRISH 6i him and get to the bottom of it all/ and then we will see what is the very smallest aid that will be needed. If it be so small that we can give it, it will be well to help them. Let Don Cristobal [i.e. De Moura, the other secretary) know what you do in the matter." It is evident from this hesitating note that the great armies and fleets which Philip was to send to Ireland and Scotland at this time (September 1593) were conjured up mainly by the hopes of conspirators who knew little of the Spanish King's methods, or by the eagerness of spies to justify the expenses they incurred. Whoever else may have been deceived, the Cecils and Queen Elizabeth certainly were not. Father Cecil was in Madrid at the same time as the Archbishop of Tuam, and we may be perfectly sure that he knew and conveyed to England pretty accurately the par- ticulars of the Irish demands and the reception of them by Philip.^ The efficient French spy Chateau Martin in Bayonne, moreover, continued to send to Lord Burghley correct accounts of Spanish arma- ^ One of the results of the conference between Idiaquez and the Archbishop is seen in a note from the former to the King (Simancas MSS., Spanish Calendar, vol. iv.) saying that " The Irish Archbishop says that it will be of great importance for the success of the con- federacy of Irish Catholics that your Majesty should write very afifectionately to the Earl of Tyrone, whose name is O'Xeil, to induce him to enter openly into the confederacy. He already belongs to it secretly, and he should be assured that your Majesty's aid shall not fail them. The Archbishop consequently begs your Majesty to order a letter to be written to the Earl to that effect." This admission would be quite sufficient to cause Philip to delay action until Tyrone's open adhesion was gained. 2 As early as the i8th September, an Irish merchant, J. Byrne, of Drogheda, who had just returned from Spain, reported to Bingham that " O'Healy, a priest or bishop, had arrived in Spain to solicit forces to maintain Macguire in his rebellion." 62 TREASON AND PLOT ments and their destinations, mainly the coast of Brittany and the south-west of France ; and to describe the prostration and feebleness of Philip. To such a depth of impotence, indeed, had Spain already fallen, that approaches were made in October by Philip's authority to Lord Burghley, through Chateau Martin, offering as a basis for peace nego- tiations between the countries that the English should have full liberty to trade in all the Spanish dominions, if the depredations of the English cor- sairs upon Spanish shipping should cease. But Burghley saw and noted that commerce was no longer the main subject at issue. Any negotia- tions that did not exclude Spain from Holland and Brittany were foredoomed to failure, and the sug- gestion came to nothing.^ But the fact that it was made shows how wide of the mark the alarmist reports of the spies were at this juncture." 1 Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. 2 For instance, Orme reports to Lord Burghley, 15th December 1593, that he had recently heard at Rouen " from Shelton, a papistical rebel, that the Spanish Armada would be ready to sail fifteen days previ- ously, but whether for Brittany, Ireland, or Scotland was unknown " (Domestic S. P. of the date). From other sources we now know that the only armament Philip had at the time ready or in preparation, except for defence, were sixteen ships at Pasages, intended to carry re- inforcements of 2000 men, three-quarters of whom were recruits, and building materials for fortifications, the destination being Blavet, in Brittany. A few weeks later (January 1594) the spy Moody, at Brussels, wrote (Hatfield Papers, vol. iv.) that since the wars with France began the Spanish army was never so great as it will be in three months' time : " so great as we here do not see how they will be em- ployed except it be for England." He adds that 5000 Spaniards had lately landed in I'jrittany (which was untrue), and that fifty sail, with 10,000 men, had arrived near Bordeaux, "which are to go to Scotland." " I assure you the expectation for England was never so great as at this present." Tlie English Catholic refugees in Flanders seem, indeed, to have principally amused themselves by exaggerating the power of Spain and the danger of England, wliich suitud Philip exactly. THE IRISH CONSPIRACY 63 As soon as the Geraldines in Lisbon had news of the position of affairs in Ireland by the Archbishop's letters, they sent a follower of theirs, one John Slatimor, to report on the feeling in Munster and Leinster towards the revolt. But an Anglo-Irish spy in Bilbao — one Patrick Comerford — was able to send particulars of his mission to Ireland before Slatimor sailed, and the footsteps of the latter were dogged with a warrant for his arrest wherever he went. He was, however, fortunate in being able to elude his pursuers, and returned to Spain before the Archbishop of Tuam left, giving Philip a vivid picture of the determination of the Irish Catholics, and the confusion and ineptitude of the English attempts to crush the budding revolt. There were, he said, 4000 Irishmen in arms against the Queen in Ulster, of whom 1000 w^ere harquebusiers ; and the English forces had been rendered powerless by dissensions. The response of the Irish contingents to the English summons had, moreover, been dis- appointing, and the Viceroy stood upon the defen- sive until fresh troops came from England. "The principal gentlemen of Munster have sent to Sir Maurice and Sir Thomas Geraldine to say secretly that they are ready to rise against the English at any moment, if the exiles will come to their aid ; " and a similar message was sent to Viscount Baltinglas from his friends and allies, notably Feagh M'Hugh (O'Byrne), " who can do great harm to the English, as he has some strong places on his lands ; especially one famous valley, where fifteen soldiers with plenty of ammunition could hold the place against the world." "Our people," Slatimor reported to the King, 64 TREASON AND PLOT "are anxiously awaiting the reply (i.e. of Philip), and are full of hope and energy. The aftairs of Ireland are now in such a condition that if his Majesty wdll send prompt and powerful aid, great effect will be produced. The Queen will be kept busy at home, with small cost to his Majesty. In order to keep the war alive it will be well to send at once some arms and ammunition, especially harquebuses and powder ; and one of the Irish gentlemen in his Majesty's pay should be sent thither to animate them with his presence." The Archbishop of Tuam was also warned that the English were on the watch to intercept and arrest him on the voyage home.^ Whether they succeeded in this is unknown. The Archbishop sailed in the winter for Ireland, with encouraging messages and promises to the chiefs in arms, and a flattering letter from the King himself to Tyrone ; but no more was ever heard of him, and neither the prelate nor his letters ever reached Ireland. In the meanwhile the King of Scots was making desperate attempts to regain touch of the Spanish intrigues of his Catholic nobles. Father Cecil and Torres found on their arrival in Scotland, early in 1594, that James's diplo- macy or his sympathies had already attracted to his side again many of the Catholics. The treason of Bothwell (who at the time was called a Protestant and an English partisan, though he shortly after- wards changed sides and joined Iluntly) in seizing and holding the King in durance in the autumn, had led James again to surround himself with 1 Slatimor also reports that the English have discovered and are working a rich silver mine near Wexford. Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. JAMES AGAIN IN THE PLOT 65 Catholics and enemies of the Stuart faction. In December 1593, we are told by a gossip at the English court, that there was much talk of James going to Mass ; and that " Lord Hume, a remark- able Papist of the realm, lay in that King's pallet." ^ But the presence of Lord Zouche in Scotland and Elizabeth's constant pressure had so far prevented the complete reconciliation between the King and the three great rebel Catholic Earls, whose promised submission to the Kirk was still unfulfilled. He was drawn closer to them soon after the coming of Father Cecil and Porres by another bold attempt of Bothwell to seize his person ; and the Earls, encouraged by the promises — and, it is asserted/ also money — sent to them by the hand of Porres, assumed an increasingly threatening attitude to- wards the Protestants,^ once again mustering their followers, in accordance with the message sent to them from Spain, and bidding defiance to the ex- communications of the Scottish Church, the sentence of confiscation and death passed upon them by the Scottish Parliament, and the real or pretended ful- minations against them by the Scottish King. ^ Antony Standen, Bircli's " Memoirs of Elizabeth." ^ Robertson. 3 Dr. Morrison, the Eatl of Essex's agent in Scotland, wrote in November 1593 that credible intelligence had just arrived that the King of Spain was preparing vast armaments for next spring. The King of Scots, he continued, had so strong a desire to avenge himself upon Bothwell, that he gave himself no rest. But finding that all persons wished well to Botliwell except the Papists, the King was obliged to make use of the latter, who were extremely glad of his Majesty's confidence, and, under that pretence, pursued their own interests and those of Popery (Birch). It was probably not so much James's desire for vengeance against Bothwell, as to insinuate himself into the Spanish scheme again that drew him to Huntly and his friends. E 66 TREASON AND PLOT James must have been fully informed by this time of the mission of Father Cecil to Spain, and his counter-stroke was to send an envoy of his own to Madrid, and to make a great show of negotiation with Philip, in order to prevent any action being taken in Scotland over his head. " II y'a grande com- munication entre les rois d'Ecosse et d'Espagne," writes Chateau Martin in March 1594, and a few days later he repeated the information to Burghley. Elizabeth was extremely indignant to hear this, and wrote, in her vigorous way, to James : " I do avowe that if you do aught by forainers ; which I do know in end worse for yourself and country, hit shall be the worst aide that ever king had, and I fear may make me do more than you will call back in haste." ^ But the money she promised to James to help him to put down the Catholic Earls and hold his own without Spanish support might have been spared 1 Elizabeth to James, May i8, 1594 (Camden Society). There is no doubt that the belief that James had opened cnmmunicaLions with Spain was true, although it is clear that his approaches would never have moved Philip. R. Douglas, writing froni Wliitting- hame, 8th June 1504, to his uncle, Sir Archibald Douglas, the Scots ambassador in England, refers to a rumour that a barque liMd come to Scotland from Spain with a money subsidy. " As concerning the gold which was thought to have come to our (rebel) Lords, I have been curious to know the truth thereof ; but ye shall believe me there was no such thing ; for in the bark there were only three passengers, a Spaniard, a Scotsman, and an English priest, who I hear has gone to England by our borders. The Spaniard had a message to the King with large otters ; but has not appeared, seeing the time not proper; and large promises he has made to these Lords of money and any other help tliey can crave against that country {i.e. England). Tliis is all I can learn of the matter." It is not certain whether this refers to the arrival of Cecil and Porres in the country some months previously, or to the mission of Colonel Semple, who went from Spain to Scotland about this time with some handsome presents from Philip to James and his wife, but the intelligence proves the general belief that James was intriguing with Spain at, the .same time as the Catholic P]ai'ls. THE BATTLE OF GLENLIVAT 67 (as in the end it probably was, but for other reasons) if the English Queen had known how complete an antidote was James himself to the intrigues in Spain of the Scottish Catholics. Whatever else might happen, it was quite certain that Philip would never spend a ducat or sacrifice a trooper to benefit him. This was perhaps the reason why, although Huntly and his friends were in open rebellion, and had thus fulfilled the conditions upon which Spanish support was to be sent to them, month followed month and still no aid from Spain came, though the Catholics depending upon Philip looked for it from day to day.' James was powerless with his own forces alone to put down the rising, even if he was really inclined to do so ; but by the autumn he could no longer resist the pressure of England and his Protestant subjects, and was obliged to make a show of bring- ing the rebels to obedience. The Campbells and the Forbeses had old tribal feuds with them, and to those clans James gave his commission to invade the lands of the Catholic peers. Young Argyll, a boy of eighteen, commanded the Protestant army of 7000 men, and met the small force of 1500 Gor- dons and Lowlanders under Huntly and Errol at Glenlivat in October 1594. 1 Foulis writes from Edinburgh to Antony Bacon (Birch's " Eliza- beth"), in July 1594. urging the need for Elizabeth to help James with money. " It is necessar}' that he {i.e. James) be satisfied . . . and in time, for the Papists begin to show themselves. The three Earls have six or seven hundred men in the field, and expect to receive forces from Spain very soon. It is thought that lo or 12 sail (i>. of Spa iards) are already at sea. The King (James) had troops enough to keep the Earls quiet, but wanted money." 68 TREASON AND PLOT " Maccallura More cam' f rae the west Wi' mony a bow and brand ; To waste the Rhinnes he thought best, The Earl o' Huntlie's land. He swore that nane should him gainstand Except that they were fey, But a' should be at his command That dwalt by north o' Tay." But alas ! for the young chieftain's boasting ; for, as the ancient ballad tells with tedious minuteness, the "Gay Gordons," with their little force, had cannon, of which the wild Campbell Highlanders knew but little, and they routed Argyll completely,^ "Now I hae you already tauld Huntlie and Errol's men Could scarce he thirteen hundred called, The truth if ye would ken. And yet Argyll and his thous^and ten Were they that took the race ; And though that they were nine to ane, They caused them tak' the chase. Sae Argyll's boast it was in vain, (He thocht sure not to tvne ^), That if he durst come to the plain, He would gar every nine Of his lay hold upon ilk man Huntlie and Errol had ; And yet for uU his odds he ran To tell how ill he sped." 1 With regard to this, Elizabeth wrote to .lames as follows in October 1594 (Letters of Elizabeth and James, Caindin Soc.) : "You see . . . what danger it bredes a king to glorify too liie and too soudainly a boy of yeres and conduict, wliose untimely a^'e for discretitm bredes ra>ch consent and uiidesentacti(ms. Such sj)eke eie they weigh, and attempt ere they consider. The weight of a kingly state is of more poix than the shalownes of a rasche yong man's hed can waigh." 2 i.e. to lose. CECIL RETURNS TO SPAIN 69 It was clear to the Catholic Lords that, although they had beaten Argyll, they could not continue un- assisted to stand if James attacked them in earnest with the aid that Elizabeth would surely lend him in such circumstances. Two months before the battle they had sent Walter Lindsay, Lord Balgarys, to Madrid, fervently praying Philip to fulfil his promise to them ; ^ and on the day following their victory they decided to send back Father Cecil with the Jesuit, Father Gordon, Huntly's uncle, to represent their desperate position to the King of Spain. Eventually, Father Gordon was unable to make the voyage, and was replaced by Hugh Barclay,' who accompanied Cecil to Spain, and in addition to the almost despairing letters of credence and exhortation which they carried, Angus — who appears to have been a good Spanish scholar — wrote to Philip placing himself absolutely at his service, without reservation of any sort. " In this unhappy country," he said, " we have no other hope than the aid of your Highness ; and in the name of the rest of the Catholics here, I supplicate your Highness to help heartily a cause so just, meritorious, and necessary, in conformity with the statement which will be made to you by Father Cecil, who is the bearer of this. As regards my own person, I beg your Highness to favour me by giving me this consolation in all my troubles, namely, to place me amongst the number of your favoured loyal servants, and to dispose entirely at your will of all I have and all I am."^ * Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. ^ Angus in his letter to Idiaquez introducing him says, "He has fought for the faith until he had a rope round his neck." ^ Simancas MSS., Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. 70 TREASON AND PLOT Before Cecil had started on his journey (November 1594), Lord Balgarys saw Philip at the Escorial (October 20), and presented the demands of the Catholic Lords. To those who know the Spanish King's methods and principles, it is sufficient to read Balgarys' statement of demand to see at once that his mission was destined to fail. Philip missed most of the opportunities of his life through his insatiable desire to force pledges and conditions upon others whilst remaining only vaguely engaged himself. It must have been a novel sensation for him to find that the Scotsmen, though they were pleading to him as suppliants, were at the same time trying to bind him down to all manner of things beforehand. The first condition presented by Balgarys would have been sufficient to stay all aid from Philip, even if it had stood alone. '* That his Majesty should grant him a patent, assuring them (the Scots) their liberties, and that the war should be declared to be undertaken to restore the Catholic religion. That for the entrance into England, the command should be given either to the Cardinal Archduke Albert or his brother the Archduke Ernest. Either of them would be welcomed by Scotsmen. That for the war in Scotland itself, his Majesty . . . should select for command a Catholic Scottish noble during the time the King (James) remains a heretic ; and, indeed, even if he change his opinions, as his conversion cannot be believed in ; and that his Majesty (Philip) should confer some dignity upon the general so selected. That a fleet should be sent to protect them, and an army to march into England. That twenty small ships should be granted to them, FRESH APPEALS TO PHILIP 71 with 1000 jjood horses, and money to arm and pay 24,000 Scotsmen, as well as arras for the Scottish priests ; for their own — which were their books — have been burnt by the heretics. That the Spaniards, both in the army and the fleet, should be pious and willing to mix with Scotsmen, so that they should form one army under a single general. It is left to his Majesty's discretion what steps should be taken to restore the Catholic faith. That priests should be sent with full authority to check the license of the soldiery as much as possible. That the money sent from Spain should be destined to certain definite uses, and not be applicable to any other purposes. There should be a written undertaking to this effect given to the King. That, with the exception of the soldiers necessary for the defence of the fleet, the rest of the army should enter England without delay, as otherwise war might break out in Scotland itself, which would embarrass the expedition and render the result doubtful. No delay will arise from the Scots, as they are ready to obey orders." In addition to this, his Majesty is asked to found a college, where the sons of the principal Scots may be educated and taught letters, " as well as the reverence they owe to the King of Spain, which should be obligatory on their successors in Scotland," All this was very different in tone from the first message sent in the previous year by Father Cecil. There was no more talk about "dealing with" James, as the King of Spain might order ; and the absence of all reference to the future sovereignty of England seems to indi- cate that the renewed kindness between James and 72 TREASON AND PLOT his Catholic subjects had not been without influence upon the plans of the latter/ At all events, the new conditions presented to Philip by Balgarys left the door open for the assertion of James's claims under Spanish auspices, on the easy condition of his " conversion." But this was not at all in accordance with the views of Philip and his Jesuit advisers, and thenceforward the charming of the Scottish Catho- lic nobles fell upon deaf ears in the Spanish court. Bland assurances of sympathy they got in plenty from the King and his secretaries and confessors, sometimes even vague, noncommital promises, suffi- cient to ensure their employment as a diversion if necessary ; but Philip's short-lived trust in Scotsmen withered from the time that Balgarys saw him at the Escorial in October 1594. Father Cecil arrived in Madrid in December 1594,^ and added his prayers to those of Balgarys ; and ^ It must not be forgotten that Philip's claim to the English crown depended mainly upon the " heresy " of James ; the alleged informality of the marriages of his parents and of his paternal grandparents being an afterthought of small importance. The reconciliation of James to the Catholic Church in Scotland, however half-hearted it might be, would therefore have entirely altered the position of Philip and his daughter the Infanta with regard to the English succession. This was the principal reason why any solution depending upon the reconcilia- tion of James was so vigorously opposed by Philip and the Jesuits. It would have suited Spanish views ])erfectly if the Catholic Scottish nobU'S had captured James and killed him, but for them to capture and convert him was the last tiling desired. '^ The Venetian ambassador in Madrid wrote to the Doge at this time (loth December 1594): " Two Scotch gentlemen came here this month on pretext of private affairs. They have had various inter- views with the King ; and in the name of the King of Scotland they have ex])laiued that his Majesty is afraid of treachery on the part of some of his powerful Catliolic vassals. He is afraid to make an open enemy of the Queen of England, otherwise he would declare himself a Catholic ; both because he is so inclined and in order to PHILIP IS IRRESPONSIVE 73 early in 1595 the Laird of Ladyland also came from vScotland with the last despairing cry of the Earls. Heartsick of the cool procrastination of Philip, which, of course, they failed to understand, for they could not look at the King's hand as we have the privilege of doing, the three envoys addressed a letter to Philip (in May ?) which set forth the hopeless position of Huntly and his friends. "Sire," they wrote, "the Scottish nobles, who with their blood have fulfilled all that in their name was promised to your Majesty by the priest John Cecil ; and not alone by their firm profession of the Catho- lic faith, but also by their devotion to your Majesty's service, have risked their lives, estates, goods, and reputation, and liave risen in arms against the united forces of England and Scotland, gaining the glorious victory they did in October (i.e. Glenlivat) over the English troops sent from Ireland and the Scottish troops paid by the English Queen : on which occasion they captured the King's standard, and his commission ordering the expulsion of all Papists, Seminarists, Jesuits, and other confederates of Spain. They now humbly pray your Majesty to send them promptly the aid promised to them in your Majesty's name by Serjeant Porres and John Cecil. In full dependence upon your Majesty's save his person from tliese treacherous attacks. At first the (Spanish) Mini>ters were suspicious of this mission, thinking that it might cover some ruse of the Queen df England, especially as it is known that the English intend to attack the Indian fleet next year. Finally, they resolvt-d to send a private emissary to Scotland, as was done last week, to speak to the King, and to throw more light on the matter" (Venetian Calendar). Whether this refers to the mission of Cecil and Barclay, or to other envoys simultaneously sent bv James to circumvent them, is nut clear ; but the latter is probably the case. 74 TREASON AND PLOT promise, the said nobles have placed themselves in the dangerous position already described, re- fusing all offers of agreement made to them on behalf of the Queen of England, to the effect that they should have full protection and liberty for their faith within their own territories, if they would undertake not to treat with Spain. It is now about two years ago since your Majesty sent Serjeant Porres and gave them hopes of succour, and Baron Balgarys has been here for the last seven months pleading for them. They have now des- patched Baron Ladyland and John Cecil as the last messengers they will be able to send on this business. Your Majesty is already informed of the need for sending prompt aid to these gentlemen ; and how greatly such aid would serve the cause of God and your Majesty. In all other things they submit themselves to your Majesty's orders ; and only supplicate your Majesty, if possible, to fulfil your royal word. If this be impossible, they pray for a reply and dismissal.— John Cecil. Bal- thasar (i.e. Walter) de Balgarys. Ladyland."^ A ^ Rolstoii, Essex's spy at Fuentarrabia, writes under date of January 31, 1595 : " The Scots gentleman has now got his despatch and will be here in twenty days. For this reason it will be proper to give orders on the coast of Norfolk to finger him in his way if it be possilile. He calleth himself Walter Lindsay, and the master of the ship is Thomas Sutherland of Aberdeen. It is oj)enly said at Fuentarrabia that he was sent to Spain by seven Earls of Scotland, of wliom the Karl liothwell and Earl of Huntly be the chiefs. What despatch he obtained I know not till he cometh to Fuentarrabia. All I can learn is thattliose Eails had sworn to make war against the Queen of England if the Kin',' of Spain would help them" (Birch). In March 1595 the Earl of Mar wrote to the Earl of Essex : "As to the negotiation of Lindsay, I think as yet the directors of him have received small or no comfort of his message." In November 1595 Mr. Aston wrote from Edinburgh DEFEAT OF HUNTLY 75 further petition of similar date prayed Philip to intercede with the Pontiff, and prevail upon him to grant to the Catholic Lords in arms the subsidy of 5000 ducats a month which he had offered to James in June 1594 if he would take up arms against England. But it was already too late for Philip to have helped them, even if he had wished to do so. James had, for once in his life, shown some activity and boldness. He had pawned his jewels and pledged what credit he had, and summoning all that was loyal and Protestant of his realm, had com- pletely crushed Huntly and Errol. Driven to their mountain strongholds, their lands wasted and their houses burnt, they humbly begged the King's per- mission to retire beyond the sea. With their exile the Catholic revolt was at an end in Scotland, and the King's position with the Protestant party firmer than ever it had been. In July 1595 he wrote to Elizabeth complaining of her slackness in helping him, and again begging for her aid against the Catholics ; for during the time of struggle into which her railing had driven him she had silently stood aloof. Again he sought to spur her as before with hints at her own danger : " Surelie, Madame, if it shal please you to wey it, ye will find we both are but at a truce and not at peace with the Romishe (Birch) that they were in great fear in Scotland of the coming of the Spaniard, and reports — from a letter received from a Scotsman in Spain — of the great preparations being made. "Mr. Walter Lindsay has been honourably entertained in Spain and is made a knight. He has obtained all he desired, both for himself and the banished lords, and is coming to Flanders with the Cardinal " (Archduke Albert). It will be seen that Rolston was mistaken, and that Balgarys remained in Spain. 76 TREASON AND PLOT Spanische practices. These Spanolised rebels of mine that are fledd the cuntrey are but retired to fetch a greater fairde if they may." ^ How far James may have really believed this it is hard to say, but wittingly or unwittingly, he had ruined the hopes of his rebel Catholic Lords by his artful intervention on the same side. It is giving him, perhaps, too much credit for penetration to suppose that he foresaw the exact result of his action ; he probably intended merely to secure for himself the benefit of any Spanish movement, and did not recognise that his participation in Catholic plans would pre- vent a Spanish expedition altogether. How little the Lords themselves still understood this, and how completely James had outwitted them, is best told in the words of the envoy they sent to Spain from Paris after their flight from Scotland. This was Matthew Semple, probably a son of Lord Semple, and CL nephew of Colonel Sir William Semple, who was an officer in Philip's pay. This is the statement handed to the Spanish King by Semple : — " On the 5th July Matthew Semple left Paris for Spain, on behalf of the Earls of Huntly and Bothwell,^ and Lord Semple, all of whom left Scotland in conse- quence of the confusion in the news coming from Flanders, hy ivhich the Catholics were made to believe that his Majesty [Philip) ivould do nothing for Scotland except with the co-operation of the King. The King of Scotland was also kept in- 1 James to Elizabeth, July 1595 (Camden Society). - Francis Stuart, Earl of Both well, the ultra- Protestant, who had so often been sheltered by Elizabeth after his attacks upon James and his Catholic advisers, had now joined his former op2ionent>;, and lived for the rest of his life on Philip's grudging charity. JAMES OUTWITS THE CATHOLICS 77 formed (i.e. by the Catholics) of what was in progress, and he deceitfully continued on good terms with the Lords. They, however, knew his intentions, and paid no attention to his doings, still hoping that his Majesty (Philip) would not allow so much injustice to be done. But as, con- trary to their expectations, an answer was so long delayed, they began to suspect that the corrupt management of the Scottish King had upset the plan, as he not only contrived this trick in Flanders [i.e. to spread the false intelligence referred to above), but also industriously sought to gain the nobles, either by force or chicanery. At last, as no answer came {from Spain), they concluded that his manoeuvres had succeeded, although the King of Scots wrote to them repeatedly that he was of the same intention as they were, and was himself secretly planning the means (to help them), pending the arrival of aid from Spain. ^ He also said that it was necessary for him to maintain a secret correspondence with them. He said, however, that he must still appear severe publicly, and assured them that he only wanted a show of obedience to him, by two or three of them leaving Scotland for any other country but the dominions of the King of Spain, for as long or ' Archibald PrimTose, writing on the yth August 1595 to John Colville (Bannatyne Club, Colville Letters) says that "Philip, by means of his instruments in Sc(jtland, had ottered James a hundred thousand crowns if he would give liberty of conscience to the Catholics in his realm, with promise of further payments when toieration was fully estaV)lislied." Primrose blames the Chancellor and other Ministers of James for his underhand dealings Avith the Catholics, but says that as he (James) was the same " auld man," in his opinion " there is no guid to be expectit at his handis," though he (Primrose) hopes to find a "way to undo the " traffique." 78 TREASON AND PLOT short a period as they liked. This was written to them secretly and with many expressions of affection ; but there was a public arrangement that many should be ostensibly banished, although only the three named really went. This was agreed to by the Catholics, in order to test the truth of the news from Flanders, spread by idle people there who for years have had no communication with Scotland. The Lords left their lands well guarded by the rest of the Catholics, such as Angus, Herrys, and Errol, who hold the authority of these in their absence. Huntly is at Cologne, and Bothwell and Semple in Paris. Semple first passed through Flanders to test the truth of the reports, but could find no impartial person to inform him, and went on to Paris, where advices were received from Huntly which caused them to despatch Matthew Semple to Spain to learn the true state of affairs, . . . We beg that the resolution arrived at may be prompted by the know- ledge that the love and determination of the Catholics will not waver if his Majesty will treat them in accordance with their deserts ; and they urge his Majesty to act with more promptitude either in deeds or resolutions in writing, and, if promises are punctually fulfilled, he may always count upon the fidelity of the Catholic Lords. — Madrid, August 1595-'" Nothing can be imagined more likely to alienate Philip than this. The Catholic Lords confessed how ready they had been to fall into the trap, and to include in their plans for the future the King whom they had formerly proposed to capture and " deal ^ Siniancaa MSP., Si)anish Calendar, vol. iv. FAILURE OF THE CATHOLIC SCOTS 79 with " as the Spanish King might desire. They had been outwitted in counsel and thoroughly beaten in the field ; and far from being able to help Philip in England,. could not help themselves or their cause in their own country. And yet they made even their affection and steadfastness depend upon the King of Spain's "treating them in accordance with their deserts," and their fidelity to him conditional upon the punctual fulfilment of his promises and his greater promptitude in deeds or resolution. Philip was not accustomed to be addressed in this way. He worked behind an impenetrable veil, and, like the decrees of an inscrutable providence, his deci- sions had to be accepted by all men with bowed heads as the emanations of a divinely inspired wisdom. To make him a party to a bargain, and to measure allegiance to him by his own fulfilment of conditions, was no less than impious in the eyes of those by whom he was surrounded. So the mission of Matthew Semple was as fruitless as that of Balgarys had been, and the man who had won the game, so far, by his cunning was James Stuart. CHAPTER IV The condition of the Catholics in England — Disagreement hetween the Jesuits and Seculars — Party politics in the English Court — Real and pretended plots against the Queen — Father Young's confessions — The irreconcilable English refugees — The conft-ssions of Webster — Polwhele's and Collen's plots — Daniel's and Cab ill's confessions — Arrest of Father Henry Walpole — The doubtful evidence in support of most of the so-called plots. We have hitherto been concerned mainly in de- scribing the intrigues by which it was proposed to utilise the Catholic elements in Scotland and Ireland for the purpose of subverting the established order in England. We must now glance at the position of the English Catholics themselves in the new circumstances which followed the defeat of the Armada. At the beginning of Elizabeth's reign, the general desire for peace, and the lack of authori- tative fixity of the Roman practice, had caused the mass of the people, clerical and lay, to acquiesce without open revolt in the change in the religion of the country. They attended church, it is true with some mental reservation, and not a few of them still secretly observed the old practices ; but a generation that had already seen at least three radical changes effected by law in the established religion of the country was not prepared to risk property and life by going to war with authority to resist the fourth ; and there can be no doubt that, if England had been free from outside inter- 80 THE ENGLISH CATHOLICS 8i ference, the end of Elizabeth's reign would have seen the Reformation permanently and peacefully settled in the country by a workable compromise depending upon general consent. The earlier con- spiracies against Elizabeth and Protestantism that took place arose, not amongst the common people or the clergy, but amongst the nobles and higher gentry — the Arundels, Lumleys, Nevilles, Percies, Howards, Dacres, Montagus, and the like — who resented the displacing of the ancient nobility from their commanding position in the councils of the sovereign,^ in favour of the secretarial class and new men who were trusted by Elizabeth. It was with the nobles that the successive Spanish ambassadors from 1559 to 1585 wove their constant plots; but the evil fate that overtook the successive conspira- cies and conspirators had, before the time of the Armada, served as a warning to a class that collec- tively had so much to lose by unsuccessful rebellion ; and although the majority of them remained Catholic in their sympathies, they had grown too cautious to be openly disloyal. That a condition of things that threatened to allow Catholicism to die out gradually and peace- fully in England should be accepted without a struggle by the leaders of the Church abroad was not to be expected. A certain number of English- men and Welshmen, who were either too con- scientious or too ambitious and deeply pledged 1 This was the principal pretext for the rising of the Northern Earls, and was recited in the Pope's Bull of excommunication in 1570 as being one of the great misdeeds of Elizabeth which had called for her condemnation. F 82 TREASON AND PLOT to change their faith at the bidding of Queen and Parliament, retired to Catholic countries, where they might enjoy their religion openly without molesta- tion. These men had no more desire, at first, to see their country submitted to the foreigner than other Englishmen ; but they were naturally de- termined, if they could, to see her Catholic. The establishment of Father Allen's seminary at Douai in 1568 answered this wish, by providing for the education of young Englishmen in the Catholic faith. Allen himself was good, gentle, and single- hearted. Whilst yet a layman he had done his best in England to dissuade his fellow-Catholics from attending the Reformed services, and thus gradually lapsing to Protestantism ; and the imme- diate object of his seminary was to furnish a stream of ardent young zealots to preach the same doctrine.^ All sorts of youths flocked to the new school. Lads yearning for adventure, runaway apprentices and students ; even soldiers and serving-men, it is said : Allen's charity was large enough to receive them all, but in such a mixed assembly there could not fail to be many who were but ill adapted to the mission they undertook. From 1574 onward great numbers of Seminarists went to England from Douai and the other colleges that were started in imitation of it." That their ministrations were in the main 1 The oath taken by a Seminarist, after confessing the signal mercy of God in bringing him out of his own country, so affected by lieresy, pledges him to devote himself entirely to divine service, and "with the divine grace in due time to receive holy orders, and to return into England to convert the souls of my countrymen and kindred, when and as often as it shall seem good to the superiors of this College" (Fuller's "Church History"). * Mendoza, the Spanish ambassador, wrote in December 1579 to the THE SEMINARISTS 83 religious, and, although sometimes ignorant and unwise, not political, is seen by the fact that up to 1 58 1 only three persons lost their lives for Catholicism in England under Elizabeth;^ although from 1570 onward all Catholic propagandists and *' obstinate " recusants were treated as disloyal sub- jects, and imprisoned when caught. Elizabeth and Burghley have been attacked bitterly for what is assumed to be their religious persecution of Catholics who had no direct designs against the State. They certainly made little or no distinction between those who plotted the invasion and subjugation of their native land, and those who, whilst proud of being Englishmen, and of the growing potency of their nation under the rule of the Queen, wished at least for liberty to worship as their consciences or teach- ing dictated. That this was the case may be partly attributed to the ideas of a period when disregard of the uniformity prescribed by law was considered to King : " The number of Catholics, thauk God, is daily increasing here, owing to the seminary for Englishmen which your Majesty ordered to be supported at Douai, whence there has come in this past year — and from the college at Rome — a hundred Englishmen who have been ordained there : by which means a great number of people are being converted, generally persons who never heard the truth preached before. These priests go about disguised as laymen, and although they are young men, their good life, fervency, and zeal in the work are admirable. God's grace is clearly witnessed in the way they are led on by His hand in this ministry, and in the joy and fortitude with which they offer themselves for martyrdom whenever they are called upon to suffer it for the Lord's sake. Some have suffered thus with invincible firmness and ineffable content, following in the footsteps of so many of their predecessors. Of the old priests very few now remain, and they are imprisoned strictly " (Spanish Calendar, vol. ii.). 1 Challoner, " Memoirs of Missionary Priests." This, however, does not include Felton, Dr. Storey, Woodhouse, and Father Plumtree, whose offences were clearly treasonable. 84 TREASON AND PLOT be a dangerous departure from the obedience due to the sovereign ; but, as Lord Burghley has himself argued in masterly fashion in " The Execution of Justice," it was far more directly traceable to the aggressive action of Pius V., a pontiff remarkable neither for his wisdom nor his learning. At a time when England was in the throes of revolution the Pope thought fit, probably at the suggestion of Dr. Morton, Dr. Webb, and the Bishop of Ross, to throw down the gauntlet, and by a Bull excommunicated Elizabeth and her obedient subjects. She, already a beloved and powerful sovereign, was denounced in coarse and brutal language as an usurper, whose subjects were enjoined to refuse allegiance, and were declared to be absolved from obedience to her, notwithstanding their oaths. Thenceforward those who acknowledged the Pope's supremacy could not acknowledge the Queen's right to the throne, and were constructive traitors ; and Elizabeth, recognising her danger, naturally treated them as such. The Northern Earls were in rebellion ; Ridolfi and the Spanish ambassador were planning the Queen's murder, and Mary Stuart was already seducing from his allegiance the greatest of English nobles with the bait of marriage. That the priests who preached obedience to the Pope and the laymen who believed in such teaching should be put in a place where they could do no harm was therefore a necessary measure of self-preservation on the part of the Government,^ 1 It should be remarked that, contrary to the opinion expressed by- most English historians, the Bull, very far from being promoted by Philij), greatly annoyed him. The intrusion of Popes and Churchmen into i)olitic3 without his connivance caused him endless trouble. The THE BULL OF EXCOMMUNICATION 85 who could not be expected to draw fine distinctions between Catholics and Catholics. With the dis- turbances in the English College at Rome and the participation of the Jesuits in the English Mission (1580), the inevitable division of the Catholics showed itself both in England and abroad. There were a dozen excuses which were good enough for the disregard of the Pope's Bull by those English Catholics who did not want to see their country under a foreign yoke. They had not seen the Bull itself; some, with Aquinas, denied the validity of the excommunication of sovereigns and people en masse, and others questioned the right of the Pope to compel them to expose themselves to risk of loss of life and goods by rebellion. But to those who accepted to the full the Papal authority, and to the extreme Jesuit party, the Bull was an ample warrant for, nay, a direct incentive to, disloyalty ; and from the time when this party obtained a leading share in directing the English Mission it was a war to the death between Elizabeth and the Catholics.^ conversion of England was to him a secondary consideration. He wanted either her friendship or her subjection. ^ Father Mush, one of Allen's favourite pupils and a most respected seminary priest, thus wrote during the appeal against the authority of the Archpriest : "At their first ingress (into England) the Jesuits so acted as to provoke the Queen and Magistrates to enact most cruel laws before unheard of against the Seminarists. The Fathers interfered in the government of the clergy. One of the Jesuits {i.e. Hey ward) con- ducted himself as if he had been a le.yate ad latere of the Holy See,'' &c., &c. Quoted in Law's "Jesuits and Seculars." In the appellant's declaration to the Pope, Clement VII., in the same cause, the secular priests wrote : " Father Persons was the principal author, incentor, and mover of all our garboils at home and abroad. He fled from the Mission like a dastardly soldier, consulting his own safety . . . but safe abroad he writes treason and threats of invasion, which so incenses the English magistrates that they rise up against us 86 TREASON AND PLOT In an earlier chapter it has been pointed out that the exposure of the ultimate plans of this party by the events of the Armada still further accen- tuated the division between the two sections of the English Catholics. Englishmen, as a rule, disliked and looked down upon Scotsmen, but at least the King of Scots was a descendant of the royal house of England, and spoke English of a sort ; and although the idea of a Scot reigning over South Britain was not a welcome one, it was more acceptable to the mass of the people than that of a Spanish sovereign — ■ a beaten enemy, with the Inquisition and all the old abuses, religious and political, in his train. And so it happened that at the time of which we are now writing (1593-95) the English Catholics, as a body, were not ready to second a Spanish invasion of their country. The English Catholic priests came over still by scores on their Mission, disguised and suffering hardships and dangers untold. They were imprisoned, tor- tured, and, if firm, executed, with all the refined horrors of death, for treason. Wisbech Castle was crammed with Catholic clerics who were less in- volved than some of their brethren, and recusant laymen were harried by ruinous fines, by imprison- ment, and by galling supervision, until they were worried into conformity, exile, or death. But withal, they, like the rest of their countrymen, and execute tlieir laws. They exclaim that it is not the concern of religion that busies us, but- that undei' that cloak we meddle in politics and practice the ruin of the State" {ibid). It will be seen by this how the inoffensive Catholic priests were thus punished for the reckless and venomous writings of Persons, of which most of them entirely disapproved. PERSECUTION OF CATHOLICS 87 who had witnessed in person the growing greatness and wealth of England under the consummate government of the Queen, were freshly quickened with pride and love for the land that gave them birth. Seminarists who came from their foreign schools to England entered, after a few months of contact with their fellow-countrymen, into the same patriotic humour ; and, hard as was the lash that fell upon them by the savage enactments against recusancy passed in the Parliament of i 593, to which reference has been made, few of the Catholics re- sident in England were really traitors to the State. But they suffered for the ignorance and bitterness of those of their countrymen who lived abroad, and were out of touch with the patriotic feeling which had grown up in England during the years of their exile. Persons and his Jesuits were to all intents and purposes foreigners. Allen, Morton, Holt, Sir William Stanley, Sir Francis Englefield, the Duchess of Feria, Dr. Stillington, Hugh Owen, Heighington, and the rest of their party, who posed as the great authorities upon English affairs in the counsels of Philip, had not seen their native land for many years. Before the Armada they had one and all assured the King that a great Catholic England was yearning with open arms to welcome the Spaniards as liberators and friends. " Not our England, but your England," said Persons's Valladolid scholars to Philip, their patron, in their fulsome address to him. Growing more and more bitter with repeated dis- appointment and failure, seeing, as the years sped on, their golden dreams of mitres, titles, and com- mands recede farther from them, whilst their poor 88 TREASON AND PLOT doles of pensions were irregularly and grudgingly paid by Philip's officers, and the bread of exile grew harder, despairing counsels of a way out by the murder of the Queen or her Ministers alternated now with the schemes of invasion and conquest, of which they talked so freely, and, as we have seen, with so little warrant. The various plans for the assassination of Eliza- beth up to this period had been mainly originated in England by nobles and gentry who sought foreign patronage or assistance for their schemes of ambi- tion. This was the case with the Ridolfi plot, the Guise plan of 1583, and the Babington conspiracy. Others, again, like that for which Dr. Parry suffered, and that of Moody and young Stafford, were more or less bogus plots, in which agents-provocateurs were sacrificed to the exigencies of party politics.^ The violent and mischievous talk of the exiles in Flanders, many of them Irishmen belonging to Sir William Stanley's rebel regiment, was now brought to Eng- land, distorted and exaggerated by eager spies, or by starved, half-distracted Seminarists, torn by the rack or terrified by the sight of it to say anything that they thought would for the moment please their captors. Much of such stuff was obviously untrue, or at least untrustworthy, but it was made the most of in '\^ England, for two reasons. Anything that aroused 1 My reason for this belief is given in the " Great Lord Burghley." Camden's lines reflect the general feeling in England at the time. " Thus did the English fugitives, lewd priests, and lay villains together plot and contrive the ruin of the Queen by all the arts they could use ; and all from a pernicious principle of bigotry rooted in their minds that princes excommunicated are not fit to live ; and the Si^anish Ministers seconded the design and improved their hatred as far as it would go." r THE MURDER PLOTS 89 horror and detestation of Spain, and of those Eng- lishmen who were assumed to have sold their bodies and souls to her, was useful — as we have seen in the report of the Parliament of 1593 — in keeping alive the patriotism of the country, inciting its liberality in the matter of supplies for defence against so das- tardly a foe, and in attracting to the Protestant side those waverers who declined to continue their identi- fication with a cause which allowed regicide to be used for its ends. The other reason why these so-called plots were \ frequently exaggerated unduly must be sought in / the political situation in England itself. Lord Burghley and his party had always stood for moderation and a mutual understanding with Spain, as opposed to the Puritan, Protestant, or war party, now led by Essex. One of the secrets of Burghley ' s great influence had been his elaborate system of spies everywhere, which had given him a monopoly of information, and an unrivalled control over affairs. Essex determined to organise a similar system, which should enable him to countercheck the Cecils. This he had done between 1590 and 1594 at great cost to himself. To aid him in his plans he had by his side for a time one of the most plausible, unscrupulous scoundrels in Europe, to whom none of the wiles of statecraft were un- known. Antonio Perez, the absconding Minister of Philip II., was able, as no other man could be, to spread the network of treachery over Europe, with the object of enabling Essex to draw England into war wdth Spain, and so to vanquish the moderate policy of Cecil. 90 TREASON AND PLOT But the Cecil party could not aflford to be outdone, either in vigilance or in solicitude for the safety of the Queen, and each organisation constantly en- deavoured to " score off" the other by the sensational nature of its discoveries, and at the same time to blacken the character and discredit the bona Jldes of its rival. The spies were necessarily persons of questionable life ; nearly alvi^ays sold both to Spain and England ; and it was usually easy to convict them of treachery. It was, in such case, often the policy of their employers to abandon them rather than seem to countenance men or methods rendered infamous by accusation ; and the agent provocateur, the eager delator, or the vain babbler, was caught in his own lure and sent to rot in dungeons or die a cruel death, whilst his noble paymaster, who knew or could guess the true circumstances, affected horror at so much wickedness. This keen competition in the discoveries of treason caused the unfortunate priests or suspects who were caught in or on their way to England to be treated as if each one of them was the emissary of a murder conspiracy or guilty of a design against the State ; and there are in the Record Office (Domestic Papers) many scores of sheets of depositions of such men, telling, under torture or threat, their poor squalid little stories of hardship and suffering, but rarely any more important political secrets than the vague tittle-tattle of the seminaries or the bragga- docio of renegade soldiers and malcontent refugees. A typical case of this sort, of which full particulars are available, was that of a priest usually called Dingley, but whose real name seems to have been "DINGLEY'S" ARREST 91 James Young, of Eylescliffe, Durham. He had lived abroad in the household of Cardinal Allen, after the death of the Bishop of Ross, whose servant he pro- fessed formerly to have been. When we first hear of him in August 1592, he had been caught some months before by Lord Burghley's pursuivants, and was lodged in the Poultry Compter in the city of London, He was ready at this time, in appearance, to tell all he knew/ He was, he said, a humble person, sent by Cardinal Allen to fetch back two priests, Warford and Almond, who were to be sent elsewhere as spies for Father Persons, and more especially to persuade another priest, named John Fixer, to return to Allen, who promised to make him his chaplain, it having been discovered that Fixer was secretly giving information to Lord Burghley. He was, he said, accompanied from Paris by several English priests, whom he had not previously known, and he had heard the directions given to them by their guide in Paris as to the person they should seek in London, He had little to tell about the English refugees in Flanders, but had heard Morgan (who belonged to the Scottish faction) inveigh against Allen and Persons, and knew of the efforts which he, Morgan, and the late Bishop of Ross had made to convince people that ' He had been captured at Easter 1592, and we learn hy the letter of another prisoner, a spy named Beard, to Antony Ashley, Clerk of the Council, that Young had remained obstinately silent, notwithstand- ing the efforts of the justices, until August. Not even his name could be discovered until the spy Beard obtained access to him ; " when within ten days I discovered him altogether" (Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 403). Tlienceforwai'd the prisoner seems to have been only too eager to give information in return for his own safety. 92 TREASON AND PLOT the Scots King would come over to the Catholic side. Sir William Stanley, on the contrary, had in his hearing breathed fire and fury, and talked at large of the plans for the coming invasion of England. Young ends his first written confession by asking pardon if he has done wrong, pleads youth and evil counsel of others, and promises to divulge the names of all the Seminarists he can discover. This was all very well as far as it went, though most of it was untrue. Mr. Justice Young and the spy Beard knew that if so much as this was divulged voluntarily, a good deal probably remained behind. An artful subterfuge then brought to Lord Burghley a long document, written by the prisoner,^ saying that he had already imparted to the Privy- Council as much as his life is worth, and will now make a clean breast of the whole business. He confessed now that he was a priest, and gave his real name and place of education. He had, he said, gained a Queen's scholarship at Durham, and had left that city in 1579 for the ostensible purpose of proceeding to Cambridge University. Lodging in London in the house of Dr. Barrett for two months, he and his host then went to Flanders via Gravesend and Dover, under the pretext of joining the army under the command of Queen Elizabeth's lover 2indi fiance, the Duke d'Alen9on. Once safe across the Channel, he proceeded to Rheims (where Allen's seminary then was), on the advice of one Darbishire, a Jesuit. There he remained for a time studying for the priesthood, but with great repugnance, as he says. Subsequently he was sent to the English College in ' Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 403, and State Papers, Domestic, cxlii. "DINGLEY'S" CONFESSIONS 93 Rome, where he studied for seven years ; was re- ceived into the priesthood, and preached in Latin before the Pope. He was then destined to read divinity at Rheims ; but before he could leave Rome, Father Persons begged the Rector at Rheims not to send any priests to England in that year (1589), but to let him have some for his new college at Valladolid. Young was accordingly sent thither with four other priests (one of them being probably the Father Cecil of whom I have already spoken), and found, as yet, only four students, though the number rapidly increased to thirty-six. Young has much to say of the manner in which Persons whipped round amongst the Spanish nobility to obtain funds for his new seminary, and the prisoner himself was designated one of six priests who were to proceed to England on a similar mission. The travelling disguise assumed by four of the priests on this occa- sion was that of English galley-slaves captured in the English expedition to Portugal, and now re- leased by the Spaniards, whilst Young and another were to sail in Scottish ships and land in Scotland, whence they were to find their way into England. But Young had enough of it by the time he got into the Downs, and " being unable to bear the seas," he landed at night and trusted to Providence for safety. All that night he lay under a hedge, and his first care in the morning was to change his outlandish Spanish garb for clothes less conspicuous. He had money, apparently, but knew nobody in London. He recollected, however, to have heard Father Persons tell the priests who were sent direct to England as galley-slaves that they were to seek 94 TREASON AND PLOT a certain Mr. Wiseman who lived at Garnet's Rents, Lincoln's Inn Fields, and in his presence to break a cake as a token. -^ Young accordingly sought the person indicated, and went through the same per- formance, being welcomed, and forwarded to Lady Throgmorton's house at Upton, beyond Stratford, in Essex. In her house he stayed for a month, minis- tering and saying Mass ; but the lady was fright- ened at a new proclamation against harbouring priests, and giving him a change of linen and twenty marks, arranged that he should sleep at an inn in London, taking his meals at the house of a Catholic family named Mompeson, in Clerkenwell ; the excuse for his presence there being his supposed courting of a " young gentlewoman " living there called Mrs. Temperance Davis. Whilst he and another priest were sitting at table in this house, the constables suddenly appeared at the door to search for such quarry. Young fled by the back way, and contrived to run to earth at the hospitable house of Wiseman in Lincoln's Inn Fields ; but the other priest (Patterson) was captured and shortly afterwards was executed. The fugitive was then sent to board at the house of one Cole, " a schoolmaster, at the upper end of Plolborn ; " but he also soon got into trouble, and again Young fled to Wiseman. The latter, however, had to leave town, and the priest went to lodge at the White Swan, Ilolborn Bridge. There was no safety in inns, for they were too well watched, and Young was promptly taken 1 The Wiseman family, most of whom seem to have lived in Essex, were notable recusants, and some of them suffered severely from the delation of Young. " DINGLE Y'S' CONFESSIONS 95 prisoner and lodged in the Compter at Easter, 1592, jnst as he was about to set out on horseback to his native county of Durham, in the hope of finding it "more quiet than this." These personal confidences, however interesting, were of less importance to the Government than news of conspiracies. The authorities had already detected Young in many misstatements, and he was pressed further. He was a mere youth, he protested, and had not been admitted into the company of the serious men of his college, but he had heard Allen say that he had dissuaded Ballard as earnestly as he could from the plot for which he suffered (i.e. the Babington plot) ; " but that Ballard was rather ad- dicted to Morgan and Charles Paget." He (Young) had been told, too, that the King of Scots had turned Catholic, and all the Scottish Catholic bishops were to be recalled to their sees, which happy event had been greatly aided by Dr. Lewis, Bishop of Cassano. " Yet after the death of the Queen of Scots both Allen and Persons sought to stir up the Spanish King, who never could be persuaded to attempt anything against England in her lifetime, objecting that he should travail for others. She being dead, the expectation was increased for the last invasion." All this was obviously merely the loose gossip of past events by men who were not behind the scenes ; but the supply of it was apparently unlimited. The names of Englishmen ostensibly in the Spanish ser- vice, their movements, salaries, and conversations are given ad nauseam; but as many of these men were actually in Burghley's pay, and sent him regular advices, we can imagine the grim smile of 96 TREASON AND PLOT the aged Lord Treasurer as he read this vague tittle- tattle of their dangerous plans. Still, as has already been pointed out in a previous chapter, the declara- tions of even this poor sieve of a man and his like were useful and valuable when they repeated the threats of invasion constantly uttered by Persons, Stanley, and others, and exaggerated the great pre- parations that were being made in Spain with that object. Young prayed abjectly for his liberation in return for his abundant declarations. His misery, his long imprisonment, his penitence, and his ar- dent desire to serve as a spy on his fellow-Catholics, were repeated at intervals for many months ; but he had to be squeezed quite dry before they let him go. Lists had to be furnished by him of every Catholic he had ever known, at home or abroad. All those who had sheltered him, and even their friends, had to be denounced. Fellow-priests, who had left Spain or Italy on the English Mission, had to be betrayed, every one of them, before at length the wretched man saw the doors of his prison open, and he was free to carry his craven heart whithersoever he willed, envying till his dying day his firmer brethren who stood steadfast even to death and martyrdom. Sometimes the pressure, such as was exerted on Young, gave a clue, even a slight one, to some- thing that seemed to be really important, and in that case it is curious to trace the tortuous devices by which more information was obtained. The clever decipherer and forger, Thomas Phellips, who was ostensibly the collector of customs at Leadenhall, was rarely at a loss for a plan, by means of which fresh avowals could be extracted from unsuspecting HOW EVIDENCE WAS OBTAINED 97 accomplices ; and TopclifFe, the examining justice, had a persuasive way with the prisoners themselves, that rarely failed. As an instance of how a case was worked up by such devices, the notes of Phellips respecting a Catholic named Bisley are curious. He sets down in his memoranda that he had learnt that Bisley had been sent secretly to England late in the year 1 59 1 by Sir William Stanley and Hugh Owen ; ^ and, as he carried letters, he is to be asked, if he can be caught, Avhether he had not a message for a priest named Birket or Burke, who Phellips knew to have been lodging at the house of an Italian who kept a bowling-alley in Bishopsgate Street, on the corner of what is now the thronging Liverpool Street. Bisley was said to have brought letters to be delivered to one Webster, a recusant who had long been a prisoner in the Marshalsea ; but Phellips suspected that Webster was to deliver some of them to Birket ; and Bisley, if he could be caught, was to be charged that this was the case. Bisley on former occasions was known to have brought letters for Webster secreted inside the buttons of his garments, one of which letters, it was said, threatened to kill the Queen, Bisley being promised a pension by Stanley and Owen when he came back to Flanders. This much Phellips had been told by his spies abroad, and the knowledge already in hand was used as a lever to obtain more. The next move was for Phellips's tool, Sterrell, alias St. Main, alias Robinson, a pretended Catholic, who served as a spy to the English refugees in Flanders, and wrote to 1 State Papers, Domestic, ccxl. G 98 TREASON AND PLOT them only what Phellips dictated, to write in the name of Robinson, as from Liege, to a Catholic named Morice at the Swan in Bishopsgate Without (May 1592), telling him, amongst many other things, at Phellips's dictation, that "the plot in England is to kill the Queen. Stanley has sent in one Bisley of Flushing, sometime a soldier there, a little, short, black fellow with a red face." This letter was of course written for the purpose of being intercepted and shown to Webster, and also to Bisley and any of his companions if they were taken. In their confusion they might blurt out further admissions or confirmation. Webster seems to have denied, probably with truth, all knowledge of Bisley and of the alleged plot. But he was care- fully watched by spies in the Marshalsea, and his every word repeated by them to Mr. Justice Young. Months afterwards, in September 1592, a fellow- prisoner, a spy, was walking in the prison yard with him, when Webster in weariness asked, " Shall we never be released ? " "I fear not," replied the spy. Whereupon Webster said that " ere long God or the devil would fetch her and them that detained them ; then asking him (the spy) to see that no one was looking, Webster went and talked to Snap, the priest, at his chamber window." This was some- thing. It was thought to inculpate Webster in the supposed murder plot, and the spy-prisoner was again set to work. In a few weeks he could inform the Justice that when a prisoner named Brownell was told that a certain man had been committed at the previous Easter for seeking to kill the Queen, he had replied "that many were committed for that, THE MANUFACTURE OF "PLOTS" 99 but some one would make an end of her one day, and then all those commitments would be void and all would be well." When the apprentices were unruly and would have broken up the Marshalsea, Richard Webster, another prisoner, said " that they could not agree because they had no head, but if they had one all the Commons would rise, for they all disliked the State and Government." This was another step, and by the 23rd December matters were sufficiently advanced for Webster himself to be again brought before Justice Young for examina- tion with another prisoner named Faux. Webster said the only Bisley he knew was the priest of that name who had married him in the Marshalsea three or four years ago ; but as Young, the magistrate, noted that this priest Bisley had been executed, he was evidently not the man they sought. Both the prisoners denied the truth of the spy's revela- tions about them, and Faux was tortured without result. Webster had already confessed enough to hang him, wrote the magistrate, but he would be put to the torture to obtain more if the Attorney- General decided. The other prisoner Brownell, who had spoken about killing the Queen, was " too sick to be dealt with until he waxed stronger." Whether Webster was put to the torture is not certain, though he probably was from the sequel, for he was afterwards removed to Bridewell and Lord Keeper Puckering took him in hand. To him Webster subsequently wrote a letter (19th January 1593) again solemnly asserting his inno- cence of any crime against the Queen or State. He begs most earnestly that his every act and word loo TREASON AND PLOT may be scrutinised and his innocence made manifest. But the effect of the pressure put upon him is seen in the continuation of his letter. He had probably under torture repeated to Puckering certain treason- able speeches he had heard others pronounce, and had promised to play the spy or agent provocateur upon his friends ; and he made this a reason for begging that he himself might be cleared from the capital offence with which he was charged. "If my innocency be not known," he wrote, " your Lordship may think that I told you of the speeches more for fear of my life than for service to her Majesty or the country. Until this matter of mine be thoroughly sifted I cannot go forward with the great good likely to be procured to the land.'' What eventually happened to him does not appear ; he probably suffered death after thus giving fresh clues to other "plots" which would be worked up like that with which he was charged. Public indig- nation and hatred were in this way constantly kept at fever-heat against a party which was represented as constantly plotting against the life of the Queen, though one loose hint of a spy or an impatient word from a distracted prisoner was evidently a sufficient foundation for the manufacture of a suc- cession of such plots. But though many of the so-called murder con- spiracies for which perfectly innocent Catholics suffered were thus elaborated, there were un- doubtedly several that were in some degree dangerous and real. They all emanated from the same small group of extremists in Flanders, with the more or less open connivance of the Spanish THE MURDER PLOTS loi Ministers there — though probably at this jimctiire without the aid of Philip himself. The proposed perpetrators were usually some of the wild, reck- less swashbucklers, English or Irish, who swaggered, drank, and diced in the Flemish cities. There seems to have been no attempt at concealment. We are told that these plots were regularly dis- cussed at a council table at which sat such men as Stanley, Owen, Jacques Francis (Stanley's Bur- gundian lieutenant), and even some of the leading Jesuit priests, such as Holt, Sherwood, and Walpole, are said to have given their approval.^ None of these plots ever came near commission, and in the cases where they were not voluntarily confessed the pressure exerted upon the captured persons in prison or the sight of the rack usually brought out the fullest particulars. For instance, one Polwhele was captured on suspicion late in 1593. He had been backwards and forwards to Flanders several times, having served there as page to Sir William Stanley, and afterwards with his lieutenant, Jacques Francis, who really seems to have been a murderous sort of personage and the principal insti- gator of the plots. This was sufficient to warrant the arrest of Polwhele when he appeared in Eng- land, although he had voluntarily come over from Calais, avowedly for the purpose of unburdening his conscience to Lord Burghley of some dark secret, and had sought the aid of Mr. Jefferys, the English Consul there, to enable him to do so. The story he had to tell was that in the summer of 1593 Jacques 1 See " The Estate of the English Fugitives," an extremely curious contemporary pamphlet giving an account of the lives of the refugees. I02 TREASON AND PLOT urged him to go to England and kill the Queen, saying " that no action could be more glorious than cutting off so wicked a member, who is likely to overthrow all Christendom." Soon after this hap- pened, Hesketh ^ was sent to England, and thereupon Polwhele seems to have gone to Father Sherwood and offered to perform the task that Jacques had suggested, if a fit opportunity occurred. " Jacques said it w^as a movement of the Holy Ghost. It could only be done when the Queen went for a walk or to the sermon : then she might be shot or stabbed, as she takes no care. If he could only escape for two or three hours he would be safe." 1 It will be recollected that when Persons sent Father Cecil to Eng- land from Spain on his first mission in April 1591, he instructed him in covert terms to sound secretly Lord Strange — son and heir of the Earl of Derby — as to his willingness to co-operate with a Catholic invasion. As the nobleman was a descendant of the Duchess of Suffolk, sister of Henry VIII., and one of the possible claimants to the Crown, his countenance would have been of great importance. Father Cecil on that occasion betrayed the cause to Burghley, and found an excuse for not fulfilling his mission ; but in the autumn of 1593 a Catholic fugitive gentleman from Over-Darwin, Lancashire, who knew the Earl of Derby, was sent by Sir William Stanley to negotiate with the Earl and his heir as to their acceptance of the posi- tion of Pretenders. Sir William Stanley, in his instructions to Hesketh, strongly hints that he is supported in his proposal by the King of Spain (Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 462). Hesketh performed his office apparently less cautiously than he was instructed to do, and the Earl of Derby, fearing a tiap, immediately denounced him to the Government (October 1 593). Tlie Earl died a day or two afterwards mysteriously, it was said by poison ; but the new Earl followed up the prosecution of Hesketh vigorously, and after much tortv\re and suffer- ing of the prisoner to wring out avowals of supposed murder plots, for which there does not seem to have been a shadow of foundation, the unfortunate emissary was done to death as a traitor at St. Alban's. Standen, an English Catholic spy of Essex's, wrote to another Catholic of similar sort in France in reference to Hesketh's execution, "A worthy piece of work, suitable to the setters on" {i.e. Staidey, &c.), " who of the Catholics here at home are accursed." POLWHELE'S CONFESSIONS 103 He was told first to go to Calais, and from thence to seek the aid of Fortescue or Sterrell/ who were at court to obtain permission to go to England. There he was to obtain access to Lord Burghley, and inveigh violently against Jacques, and in this way ingratiate himself at court. Every incentive to the proposed assassin's zeal seems to have been used by Jacques and his friends. He was directed to go to confession and to obtain absolution before he started, and sixty crowns were given him for his journey. At the same time as Polwhele's advent, an Irishman, named John Annias, was also captured coming into England. The first accusation against him was that of intending to set fire to the Queen's ships, by means of the same sort of fireballs with which the former attempt had been made at Dieppe. According to Polwhele's story, he had met Annias and his associate in the former fire- plot, Thompson, at Lille on the way to England. They had fallen into talk about another Irishman, named Patrick Collen, who had recently crossed over to England. Thompson had said that Collen had been sent over to kill the Queen, but that he (Thompson) would do it before he could. ^ He was, 1 This was walking into the lion's den indeed, for Sterrell was the spy-tool of Phellips. - As au instance of the looseness with which suggestions of such plots were made by the fugitives in Flanders, it may be cited that when Annias was under examination he said that " he supposed Pol- whele and Collen came to England to find means to kill the Queen or the Lord Treasurer." When asked why he " supposed " such a thing, he replied that " when any one comes from Brussels to England, they {i.e. the English in Flanders) think it' must be for some service, and some say to kill the Queen or the Lord Treasurer, or the King of Portugal, or some of the secretaries" (Examination of John Annias, January 1594, State Papers, Dom.). I04 TREASON AND PLOT be boasted, going to England tben on bis errand, and carried a jewel to present to the Earl of Essex, whose follower be would become/ They, Annias and Thompson, said they were going shares in the reward, which would be very large. The three rogues seem to have known each other's business perfectly, and each one intrigued to get rid of the other two ; and, as they said, to have alone the "honour" and profit of killing the Queen ; but, as it afterwards appeared, to be the first to betray the others. Thompson told Polwhele that Annias meant to rob him, whilst Annias said that Thompson intended to rob and "sell" them both. The end of it seems to have been that Thompson got Polwhele's purse and prudently stayed on the other side of the sea ; whilst Polwhele had to depend upon the charity of the English Consul at Calais to send him over and tell his story. Thenceforward, for months, Polwhele, Collen, and Annias, each unknown to the others, continued to unfold their stories in gaol. First, the plan was to fire the ships, then to kill An- tonio Perez, to assassinate the Queen and Burghley, and what not. Collen really seems to have been hired in the first instance to kill Antonio Perez with a pistol, at the request of Jacques and the Irish Captain Eustace, who, he says, warned him not to undertake anything against England or the Queen. Father Holt at first had discountenanced ^ As will be seen later, this bringing in of the name of the Earl of Essex was made the most of by his enemies. Another prisoner under torture was made to say that he had heard Hugh Owen attribute to the Earl aspirations to the crown. Hugh Owen thought it necessary categorically to deny this in a letter to Phellips, who at that time was believed to be attached to Essex. POLWHELE, COLLEN, AND ANNIAS 105 the murder of" Perez, but he eventually assured Collen that he might lawfully undertake anything for the King's service. Holt at the same time expressed to him his sorrow that he, a Church- man, had been told the exact nature of the proposed enterprise. But he nevertheless gave to Collen absolution and his blessing. The assassin Collen. having received ;^30 in gold for the voyage, seems to have felt some conscientious scruples ; and on his consulting another priest, an Irishman named Thomas, he had been told that it was unlawful to commit murder in any circumstances. Annias, on the other hand, testified to having heard Captain Eustace and Collen himself say that the latter had gone, not to kill Antonio Perez, but the Queen, "the highest Antonio of them all," and that the order for doing so had come from Spain through Esteban de Ibarra, the Secretary of State for War then in Flanders. Whilst these two villains were swearing against each other as to whether the Queen or Antonio Perez was to be the victim, the first prisoner, Polwhele, was, under TopclijBTe's persuasion, telling bit by bit a more extraordinary story still. There was no pretence in his case of any one but the Queen being aimed at. When, after some hesita- tion, he had consented to do the deed, and had informed Father Sherwood of that fact, the Jesuit had replied " that he was a fool for not undertaking it sooner, when he was first moved to it, as he then might have had the honour of it ; but that now Collen had gone on the same service, and more were going every day." It would be good sport io6 TREASON AND PLOT for them all, said Sir William Stanley, if Mrs. Elizabeth were dead ; to which, according to Pol- whele, the amiable Jacques assented, with a sug- gestion of unlimited loot during the confusion, "He, Pol whole, had often heard Jacques say they did not esteem killing Antonio Perez, who had done all the hurt he ever could do . . . nor the killing of any one else save the Queen. A man," he said, "would run as much risk in killing another person as the Queen herself ; and neither he, Jacques, nor Father Holt, would deal with any but for kill- ing the Queen." Sherwood, he said, reproved a man for undertaking to poison Burghley : the Queen alone was to be aimed at, and Jacques' intention to have her killed was public talk in Brussels. Then, in February 1594, another Irishman, named Cahill, came over and made a set of avowals to Topcliffe at Burghley House in the Strand that quite threw the aforegoing revelations in the shade. CahiU's statement was, that an Irish gentleman, named Daniel,^ had informed him in the previous May that Sir William Stanley, Father Holt, and Hugh Owen wanted to employ a tall, resolute, desperate Irishman to go to England and kill the Queen. Daniel suggested that Cahill should under- 1 Daniel wrote to Lord Burghley in the previous August 1 592 from Calais begging permission to come over to England safely to give some very important news. He warned Bui-ghley at the same time to have great vigilance exercised iu preventing any of Stanley's men from joining the Queen's forces going to France. Daniel was allowed to come over, and doubtless from his disclosures the whole of the other proceedings in England arose. In February whilst Daniel's tool, Cahill, was under examination, the former gave notice to the Govern- ment of a plan to fire tlie magazine in the Tower, &c. (Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 474). CAHILL'S CONFESSIONS 107 take the task and get the money ; whereupon they (Daniel and Cahill) should both go to England and divulge the plot to Lord Burghley. Cahill relates that Daniel then took him to Fathers Plolt and Archer at Brussels, and they and Hugh Owen had said " that it would be a most blessed deed for him, a soldier, to kill the Queen, as by it he would win heaven and become a saint if he should be killed. If he would do it he would be chronicled for ever." The plan suggested to him was to get into the service of a courtier, " and then manage to waylay her (the Queen) in some progress, and kill her with a sword or a dagger at a gate or narrow passage, or, as she walked in one of her galleries." Cahill consented, the price being fixed at 100 crowns down, and 2000 and a pension if he were successful. Thereupon, with the blessing of Archer, the precious pair, Cahill and Daniel, went to Calais. From there the latter wrote in August to Lord Burghley, telling him he had an important revelation to make if he was allowed to go over. This being accorded to him, he left Cahill in Calais ; whilst he made the first disclosures in England. In Daniel's absence the two Jesuit fathers. Archer and Walpole, came to Calais, and finding Cahill still there, were very angry, and said that Stanley, Owen, and Holt were indignant at so much delay. Upon their urging, Cahill consented to sail secretly for England at once, and landing at Margate, came on to London to join Daniel, who conducted him to Lord Burghley. This stoiy was, of course, con- firmed in every particular by Daniel ; and it is not surprising to hear, as these plots were divulged io8 TREASON AND PLOT through the Cecil organisation, that mysterious hints were indulged in that for his own ends the Earl of Essex was more or less mixed up in the nefarious plans, as had been the case when Hesketh was charged and executed for having been sent over by Stanley to sound the Earl of Derby. It will be noticed that in all the declarations of the prisoners, there was an eagerness to prove their intention from the first to betray their employers, and that their consent to kill the Queen had never been sincere. There is, moreover, an utter absence of proof, beyond their own respective assertions and the conversations they had with each other. Great caution must therefore be exercised in accepting the evidence as conclusive as against their alleged in- stigators ; but enough residuum remains, after all deductions, to give grounds for believing in the existence of an intention on the part of some of them to assassinate the Queen if a favourable opportunity offered, or to betray the plot if the contrary was the case. The weakest case is against the Spanish Ministers, whom all English historians have condemned upon the flimsiest evidence, and especially against the King, who certainly for the moment would have been seriously embarrassed by Elizabeth's sudden death ; ^ though doubtless the 1 As we have seen already, Philip was in no position at this time to take advantage of Elizabeth's death if it had occurred. He was in dire .straits for money ; his naval preparations were utterly inadequate for an attempt to impose a nominee of his own upon the English nation as king ; he had not yet fixed upon any definite policy as to the course to be pursued on the Queen's death ; and, with his methods, nothing could be decided upon without infinite delay and considera- tion. He was, moreover, straining every nerve fighting a losing battli' in France, iioth in Provence and BrittaTiy, and had the greatest diffi- RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PLOTS 109 removal of Antonio Perez, his hated enemy, or of Don Antonio, the Portuguese Pretender, would have been extremely welcome to him. Hugh Owen himself wrote a spirited letter (March 1594) of disclaimer to Phellips, both as to the complicity of the Earl of Essex in any negotia- tions of theirs, and also as to himself or Stanley having urged or hired to kill the Queen any of the men who had confessed. He had, he said, never seen Collen in his life, and had hardly exchanged a word with Cahill or Polwhele ; and •' neither he, Owen, nor Sir William Stanley had any more to do with killing the Queen than the man in the moon." He protested against the re- putation of men like himself and his associates being taken away by *' perjured jacks, who could not in any Christian commonwealth bear any credit for witnesses." Annias, he says, " is a sorry fellow, who can make white powder, but would not kill a cat if she looked him in the face,"^ who had recently fled from Flanders for killing and robbing a Spaniard. Owen ascribed to Daniel the invention of the whole story about Annias, not dreaming that the latter was coming to England ; but on this point, of course, Owen was ignorant of the com- promising admissions of Annias himself, and of Polwhele with regard to him. The Duke of Parma, he said, was constantly receiving intelligence of similar plots being hatched against him in England, culty in protecting his own coasts and commerce. He was not vet nearly ready to take advantage of the death of Elizabeth ; and in my opinion at this period did not desire her sudden removal. 1 Owen does not attempt to deny the accusation of having employed Annias to burn the fleet. no TREASON AND PLOT but always disdained to notice them. " If the Queen and her council would do the same, they need never unquiet themselves as they do, nor so easily permit false juries to cast away so many innocent men." No doubt the confessions of the criminals were in most cases interested or exaggerated, but Hugh Owen's denials fail to carry conviction sufficient to demolish their stories altogether. An age that saw Henry III., Guise, Orange, and Henry IV. assassi- nated was not squeamish about killing princes, if they were considered to be in the way ; and the few violent extremists in Flanders, and more especially Jacques, belonged to the visionary type from which regicides are usually drawn. Another case of which much stir was made happened shortly before Owen's letter was written. In January 1594 three persons were caught whilst landing surreptitiously near Flamboro Head in Yorkshire. One of them was found to be Father Henry Walpole, the Jesuit to whom Cahill's con- fession had referred, the other two being one Lingen and Walpole's young brother, both of them being soldiers in Stanley's regiment. Young Walpole was quite communicative from the first, but the other two prisoners for a time refused to make any admission. Father Walpole was looked upon as an important capture, and in the light of Cahill's reference to him it was immediately assumed that his coming to England was for some deep political object. His brother confessed that the priest had given him six scraps of parchment — which are believed to have been passports for the conveyance FATHER HENRY WALPOLE iii of recusants abroad — and twelve letters ; which were buried in the sand of the shore where the prisoners landed. Topclifife was sent down to York to " work up " the case, and disinterred the letters, which, as they must have indicated many correspondents in England, so much delighted the Earl of Huntingdon, President of the North, that we are told that " his Lordship leaped for joy," when they were slowly unfolded, dried, and read. " Much lies hidden," wrote Topcliffe, " in the Jesuit and Lingen which cannot be digged out without further authority." The " digging out " process was a long and painful one for the wretched prisoner.^ Again and again Father Walpole protested that his mission was a purely religious one : he was to administer the sacraments and exhort Catholics to remain faithful, obeying in all things his superior in England, Father Garnet ; but he stoutly denied his sympathy in plans for a Spanish invasion or subjection of his country; "which," he said, "would ruin England, seeing the vicious and wanton character of Spani- ards." He repelled, too, with horror the suggestion that he favoured the assassination of the Queen. But alas ! it was discovered that, when he was about to set out from Spain on his voyage, Father Persons ^ At one of his public examinations the unhappy man said that he had been put to the torture no less than fourteen times. The most common torture to which he was subjected seems to have been that of suspending him by sharp irons cutting into the flesh by the hands for six or seven hours at a time, the tips of the toes just touching the ground. A most interesting account of Father Walpole and of the awful cruelty with which he was treated— though probably not worse than hundreds of other poor creatures equally innoct'ut of treason — wiU be found in Dr. Augustus Jessop's "One Generation of a Norfolk House." 112 TREASON AND PLOT had carried him to King Philip, who had said to him " Dios os encamina " — God further you ; and he had gone thence to Secretary Esteban de Ibarra in Flanders, from whom he had received some money. Besides, he confessed that he was to report himself to Garnet, who, as Lord Burghley argued, " might haply commit to him some matter of the State." ^ In vain he prayed for mercy, for mere life. He would conform to the law, and preach in the English Church according to the word of the Gospel. He would betray all his associates, break all his vows. It was of no avail : the unfortunate Jesuit was carried to York again with others in like case, and there suffered the death of a traitor.^ There was not a shred of evidence, except Cahill's indirect implication, that Walpole was privy to the murder plot ; but the prisoner's disclaimer of any sympathy in a Spanish invasion of England is valueless, even if true, as the efforts of his superiors in that direction are abundantly recorded under their own hands : he was a Jesuit, bound blindly to obey, and, as a * Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. p. 608. 2 Father Walpole with another priest in like case, Alexander Rawlins, suffered martyrdom ou the 7th April 1595. The death meted out to all these poor creatures was hanging for a short time and then, often before they were unconscious, disembowelling. One of the most dreadful — and apparently undeserved — punishments was that inflicted upon Father Robert Southwell, the chaplain of Philip, Earl of Arundel, who was indicted for disaffection at the time of the Armada, but died in the Tower. The chaplain Soixthwell was less fortunate. There was no pretence in his case of his having been accomplice in plots ; he was simply indicted of being a priest and of performing Mass in the Queen's dominions. After more than three years of the most heart- rending cruelty in the Tower, he was hanged and disembowelled at Tyburn on the 21st February 1595. COMPLICITY IN THE PLOTS 113 member of the Society, his personal sympathies went for nothing. It will be seen by the cases recited in this chapter that the accusations that have been repeated by nearly every English historian from Elizabeth's time to our own, of widespread and numerous plots by Catholics to assassinate the Queen at this period, are to a large extent unsupported by serious evidence. That a small party of extreme men may have counte- nanced such plans is certain, and that some of the wild schemes of regicide, so readily confessed under torture by the intended assassins themselves, were real and dangerous, is more than probable, but that any large section of Catholics, clerical or lay, approved of such means of forwarding their religious objects is untrue, and an impartial examination of the whole of the known facts will prove this to be the case. In accordance with the usual practice, it was the policy of the English Government at the time to blacken the character and methods of the national enemy as much as possible, and it was especially the object of the Essex party to exas- perate English feeling to the point of forcing Eliza- beth to declared and open national war with Philip. Religious feeling, moreover, ran very high in England itself, and for the zealous Protestants to fix upon Catholicism in general the stain of regicide and dis- loyalty was a victory for their own side which could not fail to win over waverers who were Englishmen first and Catholics afterwards. Pamphlets and broadsides, professing to give the whole story of the various murder plots, were numerous, and have formed the basis of our historical relations for three H 114 TREASON AND PLOT centuries ; but they were written in nearly every instance with political or party object, and, from the nature of the case, were necessarily based upon an imperfect or partial statement of the facts. The opening of our own and other national archives in recent years has now enabled us to go to the original sources of information and attempt to dis- cover the truth for ourselves, free from the heat or bias that warped the minds of men who were too near the events to see them clearly. The net result of such inquiry tends to show that, whilst the methods and ethics of ruling statesmen were far less scrupulous than those of our own day, and the valuation of human life as balanced against the welfare of the State much lower, yet the moral rectitude of the mass of the people was quite as high as our own, and it would be as unjust then as now to attempt to fasten upon the members of a particular Church, or upon any large section of the community, the reproach of favouring regicide. Even the English refugees on the Continent must nearly all of them have been against the commission of such a crime, or the Queen M^ould never have died a natural death. We not only have the apparently sincere voluntary declarations in innumerable letters from English exiles of their loyalty to the sovereign and State, but the fact remains that, notwithstand- ing all the loose talk of the swashbucklers, no serious attempt was ever really made to commit the murder. CHAPTER V The conspiracy of Dr. Lopez — The confessions of Yorke and Williams — The alleged connection of the Spanish Ministers with the murder plots. In the preceding chapter I have dwelt upon a few typical cases of the so-called Catholic murder plots against the Queen, to show how their importance was exaggerated for political reasons, and how very few of the English Catholics can have sympathised with them. I have, however, reserved for treat- ment in a separate chapter the two principal con- spiracies, the fame of which rang throughout England, and aroused a fervour of loyalty towards the person of the Queen, which surpassed any pre- vious manifestation of the people's love for her. This outburst was partly in consequence of the peculiar features of treachery with which one of the plots seemed to be surrounded, and the fact that both of them were ostensibly traced directly to the instigation of the King of Spain or his Ministers. We saw in the last chapter that the loose boast- ing of Captain Eustace, repeated by Annias, was accepted as a reason for associating Esteban de Ibarra, Philip's Secretary of War in Flanders, with the plot for the Queen's assassination ; but this evidence was really so slight as hardly to be worth consideration. It was otherwise with the famous conspiracy of Dr. Lopez, and the atrocious plot ii6 TREASON AND PLOT confessed by Edmund Yorke and Williams. The first of these two intrigues deserves special con- sideration here, because its apparent heinousness aroused English hatred of Spain to the highest pitch, and so greatly influenced subsequent events, and also because my own recent researches at Paris and in Lord Calthorpe's MSS. have provided me with new information which must be taken into account before a final historical verdict can be given, either as to the guilt of Lopez himself, > or as to the direct complicity of Philip IL in a plot to murder his sister-in-law. The story is extremely involved, but I will endeavour to reduce it to as simple a form as is compatible with the statement of all the facts upon which a judgment should be based. Contrary to the course followed by other writers on the subject, I propose to set forth the facts as they were disclosed, instead of in the order in which they were supposed to have happened.^ Dr. Rodrigo or Ruy Lopez, though a professed * The principal authorities upon the Lopez plot are as follows : — State Papers, Domestic, from vol. ccxxxviii. to cclviii.,1 abstracted in the Calendars for 1593-94; the Gawdy Papers, Hist. MSS. Commis- missiou ; Hatfield Paj^ers, vol. iv. ; the Bacon Papers in the Lambeth Palace Library, of which Birch's extracts are in B.M., Sloane MSS., 41 12, and are mostly published in his "Memoirs of Queen Elizabeth ;' Charles Yetswirt's " True Report of Sondry Horrible Conspiracies," London, 1594 (French version of same; also London, 1594); Francis Bacon's " True Report of the Detestable Treason ; " Bishop Goodman's " Court of James I. ; " Sir William Waad's detailed ac- count of the case in Lord Calthorpe's Manuscript Papers (for allowing me access to which I desire to thank his Lordship) ; an excellent article called "The Conspiracy of Dr. Lopez" in the Englwh Historical Review, for July 1894, by tlie Rev, Arthur Dimock ; and Mr. Sidney Lee's article on " Lopez " in the " Dictionary of National Biography." There is also a contemporai-y statement of the whole case drawn up by Coke, the Solicitor-General, in Harl. MSS., P.M., 871. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 117 Protestant, was one of those Iberian Jews throu":h whom the medical lore of the ancient Orient filtered to the Western world. Thel'persecution of this race in the Peninsula had driven them forth with their learning and traditions to seek safety in other lands ; and in the sixteenth century no court in Europe lacked a physician of this sort, who was reported to possess secrets of science unattainable to the Gentile practitioners in their profession. Such men naturally attracted the dislike and jealousy of their medical rivals, both on account of their mys- terious skill and their outcast race. They were generally self-seeking intriguers, who often wormed themselves into the confidence of high personages, and added to their wealth and importance by making themselves useful as intermediaries in affairs of state, where their knowledge of tongues and their con- fidential position gave them an advantage over others. Lopez had lived in London since the beginning of Elizabeth's reign, first in Broad Street in the city of London, then in Wood Street, and finally in Mount- joy's Inn, Holborn. Gradually he became a leading physician, and obtained the patronage of Leicester, whose household doctor he was. Leicester was accused by his enemies, and notably by Father Per- sons, of a propensity for removing inconvenient friends or rivals by poison, and naturally his house- hold physician shared his evil repute in this respect. The English medical men of the time shrugged their shoulders and turned up their eyes when Lopez was mentioned, and it became an accepted fact that the Portuguese Jew had more skill in intrigue and self-advertisement than in medicine, and knew more ii8 TREASON AND PLOT about poisoning than healing. But with the patron- age of Leicester and Walsingham, both members of the Puritan party, Lopez continued to prosper greatly in spite of frowns and sneers. In 1586 he was appointed principal physician to the Queen, he was house-physician of St. Bartholomew's Hos- pital, and was to all appearance a person of wealth, though he was really impecunious. In the pursuit of profit he was certainly indefatigable. He had a monopoly for a term of years of the importation of shumac and aniseed into England ; his son was being educated at Winchester College, Oxford, by means of the revenues of a parsonage granted to him by the Queen ; one of his wealthy patients gave him a house ; and when Don Antonio, the Portuguese Pretender, came to England to crave the assistance of Elizabeth, Dr. Lopez at once be- came his advocate at court, his interpreter, and his inseparable friend — doubtless for very handsome consideration, for the Pretender, at his first coming, had brought with him from Portugal some of the finest jewels in the world, and whilst they lasted he was a welcome guest both to Elizabeth and to Catharine de Medici. Lopez had acted for his patrons, Leicester and Walsingham, in presenting Antonio's cause to the Queen in the most glowing colours ; and, influenced by his representations, Elizabeth had been induced to consent to the joint-stock company invasion of Portugal by an English force in 1589, which ended in a dismal fiasco.^ Elizabeth was very angry with Antonio * The history of this expedition is fully related in " The Year after the ArniaHa," by the present writer. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 119 for the failure of his hopes, and Lopez was ex- tremely apologetic for his share in the transaction. Thenceforward the Pretender was under a cloud, the jewels were soon gone, and the crowd of Portuguese adherents who had surrounded him whilst his hopes lasted began to fall away from him. Many of them had already prepared a path for their political salvation by serving as spies in England for Philip, and as early as 1586 one of them had sent proposals to Mendoza in Paris, and to Philip himself, to have Don Antonio poisoned.^ To these proposals Idiaquez, the King's secretary, re- plied to Mendoza that "the deed might be done without scruple as Don Antonio is a rebel, and has been condemned to death by law." The murderer was to have 25,000 or 30,000 ducats, and Idiaquez, by order of the King, urged that no time should be lost in performing the service.^ The proposed assassin, however, was a windbag, and the attempt came to nothing; but in the following year (1587) the same spy, Vega, mentioned a plan that he had for persuading Dr. Lopez to poison Don Antonio, by purging the latter with Indian acacia, instead of with his customary fortnightly purge. This was merely mentioned, together with a number of similar vague ideas proposed with the same object by Vega, and does not in any way commit Lopez yet. But shortly afterwards, Vega wrote that he had succeeded in gaining over Dr. Lopez, whom he had " converted to his Majesty's service with good promises, and he has already done wonders in trying ^ MSS. Siraancas and Paris, Spanish Calendar, vols. iii. and iv. ^ Spanisli Calendar, vol. iv. p. 12. 120 TREASON AND PLOT to get him, Antonio, turned out of here." Mendoza, in a marginal note to this letter, scornfully asks why Vega, *' if he is so sure of Dr. Lopez, does not have Don Antonio put out of the way altogether." On a mere hint which Don Gerau de Spes gave him (Lopez), he offered to purge a Portuguese pilot who was busy about some expeditions from England to the Indies. He took the recipe to the apothecary himself, and on his way he let it fall out of his breeches pocket, in consequence of which he was kept for six months in the Tower, " I {i.e. Mendoza) will say that this other business will be well paid for, as the doctor knows, and it may be settled without hesitation." ^ But Lopez would do nothing on Vega's word alone, and wanted a distinct pledge in writing from Philip or his Ministers. Distrust pre- vented this from being sent, and the matter for the time again fell through. After the wreck of the Armada, Lopez busied himself greatly in favour of the Spanish prisoners of the poorer sort from one of the captured galleons, and claimed to have rescued 300 of them from the gallows and secured their liberation. One of the most daring and effective of the Portuguese spies was Manuel de Andrada," who sent to Mendoza in * Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. p. 78. I cannot find any confirmation of Mendoza's statement that Lopez was imprisoned, as he says, though it is no doubt true that he agreed to poison the Portuguese pilot, Bartolome Bay on, in 1571. 2 Every writer on the subject with whose works I am acquainted lavishes upon this man vituperative epithets, wliich, so far as I can see, are absolutely unjustified, except that, like all the dramatis j>ersonm, he was a double spy. Motley calls him " the famous Portuguese poisoner,'' which he certainly was not. Mr. Diniock says he " was a ruffian pure and simple." Tlie papers I shall cite from Simancas and Paris will prove that at all events he told the truth. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 121 Paris absolutely correct and full advice of English naval affairs, and of the movements of Don Antonio. He spoke French and Flemish, and was frequently sent by Don Antonio on missions abroad, but was already, in 1590, suspected — and with good reason — of playing false to his master. During his absence in France on Don Antonio's business, he had left as his substitute in England another spy, one Rodrigo Marques, and on Andrada's arrival in London from Dieppe at the beginning of 1590, he had met his substitute there, and had learnt of Don Antonio's intention to fly from England to seek the aid of the Dutch, the Huguenots, or even of the Turks, since Elizabeth was unwilling to help him further. Andrada was secretly instructed by the Pretender to freight a ship for this purpose to carry him to Dieppe, and treacherously stipulated with the Flemish skipper, for 10,000 crowns, to alter his course when he was out at sea and run the vessel into Dunkirk, where Antonio would be at the mercy of the Spaniards. This pretty arrangement was conveyed in a letter written by Andrada to Mendoza in Paris, but the letter was intercepted, and, although written with sensitive ink, was promptly deciphered by Phellips, and Andrada was clapped into jail, Marques flying into hiding until the hue and cry was over, and then escaping into France. By the strenuous intervention of Dr. Lopez, An- drada was released, instead of being hanged by Don Antonio ; and when he arrived in France, the spy had a strange story to tell the Spanish ambassador. He had, he said, made great efforts to win over Dr. Lopez, "who is a person of great influence with the 122 TREASON AND PLOT Queen and Council." " When Andrada was about to leave England, the Doctor said that as he had saved Andradra's hfe — which he certainly did, for if he had not interceded for him nothing else could have rescued him — he would confide in him that he had already been approached by Mendoza for the purpose of putting Don Antonio out of the way ; ^ but he had refused, as he was distrustful. He had been the means, he said, of saving from the gallows over three hundred Spaniards from Don Pedro's ship, who had been sentenced to be hanged ; and yet, for all this, he had never received any favour whatever from his Majesty (Philip). He said that God had ordained my imprisonment, and made him the in- strument of my release, in order that he might be able implicitly to trust me ; and since I displayed so much zeal in the service of his Majesty, I might tell Don Bernardino (Mendoza) that if he, Dr. Lopez, received his Majesty's orders to negotiate an arrangement, this was the time. He was sure that the Queen would concede any terms that were demanded of her, as she was in great alarm. It was not necessary to write about this, but that I should go to Calais, and write to him from there to the effect that, bearing in mind the clemency the Queen had extended to me, I was discussing with Mendoza subjects which would redound greatly to the advantage of her country ; " and that if a pass- ' It is fair to observe that on a former occasion wlien Lopez said this to Vega, Mendoza said it was a lie ; but there was nothing impro- bable in it. - Letters to a similar effect to this were written by Andrada to Lopez in 1 59 1 from Calais. See Calendar of State Papers, Domestic, for that year, where translations of them will be found. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 123 port were sent to me, enabling me to go backwards and forwards freely, which passport Lopez promised should be sent at once, I could come secretly and stay in his house in London, where Secretary Wal- singham could come and speak with me. He, Lopez, had no doubt that the Queen would come to terms with his Majesty, and would force Don Antonio to do the same, on the conditions that his Majesty might think just. She would also cause the Netherlands to agree, and he, Lopez, on his part, would endeavour that everything should be done to his Majesty's satisfaction. No one was to know that he had discussed this matter with me. He would continue to let me know the decisions arrived at by the Queen's Council ; and when things were sufEciently advanced towards a conclusion to his Majesty's satisfaction, personages might be sent to make the formal contracts. He hopes that every- thing may thus be settled speedily and advantage- ously for his Majesty ; and he promises, if the matter be kept secret, that he will inform me of everything that happens of interest to his Majesty. If an arrangement be not arrived at, he promises that Don Antonio shall be sent away from England, or detained as his Majesty may desire, and if the present suggestion fell through he would continue to protect his Majesty's interests in England. In very truth no person can report so well as he can, in consequence of his great influence with the Queen and Council : but . . . energy and liberality are necessary." ^ It is evident that Walsingham was behind Lopez ^ MSS. Paris Archives, Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. 124 TREASON AND PLOT in this suggestion, and having in view the party to which he belonged, we shall be safe in assuming that the suggestion of peace negotiations was only a screen behind which agents might go backwards and forwards to Spain, and obtain information of armaments, &c. But two parties can play at such a game as this ; and when Andrada, with Marques in his company, proceeded to Spain, apparently them- selves in all sincerity, Mendoza suggested to the King, and the latter approved of the suggestion, that Andrada shall be " sent backwards and for- wards to England under cover of the negotiation, so that he may be able to report what is going on there." ' This, however, was not the only message that Andrada took from England. A brother-in-laAv of Lopez (whose name is not mentioned, but who was one of several brothers, English Jews, perhaps originally from Portugal, named Jorge or Anes) had professed to be deeply oflfended with Don Antonio for having spoken ill of his father (Gonzalo Jorge?), and promised, if a person were sent to him with an agreed token, he would " kill Don Antonio if his Majesty desired." He disapproved of the peaceful suggestion of his brother-in-law Lopez ; but, pend- ing the authority to kill the Pretender, he also would send information from England. Andrada protests that "he never, on his conscience, urged the person to do this ; yet, seeing that although the heretic Queen had been merciful to him, Don Antonio had tried by all means to have him killed, he, Andrada, in revenge for such cruelty, is now disposed to do ^ ^ISS. Paris Archives, Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 125 everything against Don Antonio, even to have him killed. Nothing will be done, however, without his Majesty's orders." These were the missions that Andrada carried to Madrid, in part with the connivance of Walsingham, through Lopez ; and I have quoted thus fully from these documents, which are here used for the first time, because upon this negotiation was subsequently built the accusation against Lopez of participating in the plot to murder the Queen, and an infinity of totally unsupported scandal was grouped around it. Andrada and Marques, as usual with persons of their rank, did not negotiate in Spain with the King him- self, though they said they were admitted to the presence of Philip, who was seriously ill at the Escorial, to kiss his hand, as he sat in his great black velvet wheel chair. The peace suggestions of Dr. Lopez were discussed with Don Cristobal de Moura, Philip's favourite Secretary of State, and, although we know that the negotiation was as hollow on one side as the other, Andrada was sent back to England, with full instructions to proceed in the manner proposed by Mendoza. Moura's draft instructions on the matter are plain and precise. It is probable that Andrada himself was to think that the Spaniards were sincere, although, if such was the intention, he was really not deceived, and on his arrival in England at once divulged the truth in this respect to Lord Burghley. The draft for his instructions ^ clearly demonstrate that his negotia- tions in Spain were confined to the matters he had already stated in writing to Mendoza, namely, the ^ See Appendix, p. 162. 126 TREASON AND PLOT peace negotiations, the confinement in or expulsion from England of Don Antonio by the influence of Lopez, the murder of Don Antonio by Lopez's brother- in-law, unknown to the doctor, and the gaining of in- formation in England. All these offers were accepted by Philip's Minister Moura, though, as will be seen, not the faintest indication is given in these most secret papers of any hint of a plot to kill Elizabeth, and certainly none was included in this negotiation. Of course, Moura must have known perfectly well that such an envoy as Andrada would have had no chance of negotiating a peace with the Queen, and the hint that "satisfaction" must be given by England, with- out, apparently, any concession on the part of Spain, would of itself have rendered the negotiations abor- tive. The whole matter, indeed, was insincere on both sides, with the object of gaining information. When Andrada and Marques were about to set out for England, Moura only provided the insignificant sum of 300 reals ( = ^6) for their voyage, and a pro- mise of a pension of 30 reals (per month ?) ^ at some future time. So empty, indeed, was Philip's treasury that Andrada's demand for a jewel for Dr. Lopez's " daughter," and the payments for the doctor's brother-in-law and the spy who furnished Andrada with information, had to be met by taking some of the "old jewels from his Majesty's casket"" in lieu of sending money. The '* old jewel" sent to I^opez's daughter was a fine diamond and ruby ring, worth ;^ioo, and it was made, three years afterwards, one of the principal pieces de conviction against the doctor. It was said to have been sent direct ^ See Apjiendix, p. 162. ^ Ibid. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 127 from Philip to Lopez as a pledge for the murder of Elizabeth, and was asserted to have been ac- companied by an " embrace " from the King himself. Andrada doubtless boasted and made the most of his mission ; but there is no indication in the Spanish documents that any such message was sent, or even that he saw Philip at all. To any one who knows, as I do, the relations that existed between Philip and the rest of mankind, the mere idea of an "embrace" being sent by the King him- self through such a messenger as Andrada to such a person as Dr. Lopez is ridiculous. The ahrazo, at all events, may be dismissed as a fable invented long afterwards. The ring itself may have been intended for the Queen, as Lopez's daughters were young girls, and it is not likely that a ring would be sent to either of them. In any case, Lopez offered the ring to the Queen, though it is not clear whether he told her from whom it came, and she graciously refused it,^ Of Marques we hear no more, but Andrada, after suffering shipwreck and many adventures, arrived at Havre in the summer of 1591, and begged the English Government to give him a passport to come to England. Walsingham, however, had died in the meanwhile, and Lord Burghley had received from his spies full information of Andrada's sus- picious visit to Spain. Besides, his former betrayal of Don Antonio had marked him as a dangerous man, and when, eventually, after detention as a suspicious character by the Huguenot governor of Dieppe, he * The fact of her having refused the ring is presumptive evidence of Lopez having said it came from Philip. As a rule, she received such presents from her courtiers with alacrity. 128 TREASON AND PLOT was brought to Rye, it was as a prisoner of the Eng- lish. Lord Burghley, who evidently knew nothing of Walsingham's complicity in the matter, attached much importance to Andrada's coming. The air, as we have seen, was full of the talk of the Spanish plots, and here was a man known to be a traitor to his own King and in the pay of Spain, coming straight from Philip and was seeking entrance to the English court. When Andrada was brought to Rye (August 2, 1591 O.S.), he wrote to Burghley begging that he may be examined by the Lord Treasurer himself or by some person of great trust, as his mission was important ; ^ and to the King, Don Antonio, he also sent a letter full of contrition for past errors, saying that he always wished to serve him, and had determined, in unison with Marques, upon a course which would complete successfully the matter he had in hand. Pie trusts, he says, that Antonio's Minister, Botello, may be present when he speaks to the Lord Treasurer on matters concerning the Queen and Philip IL Burghley's answer to the spy's letter was to send Mr. Mills to Rye with Botello and Dr. Lopez to examine Andrada and his papers, "at first civilly, and then threateningly, so that in fear of his life he may be compelled to disclose the truth." On the 13th August, Andrada related to Mr. Mills quite truly everything which I have already told from the documents themselves. From that time to this English historians have characterised this statement of his as a pack of lies," and the man himself as a ^ State Papers, Domestic. - Mr. Dimock, for instance, dismissed it as " of course, all sheer false- THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 129 perjured braggart ; but I have checked every state- ment and cannot find one discrepancy. He had been sent on this peace negotiation, he said, by Pliilip, whilst the latter prepared an expedition against England or Ireland : he told the whole story of his former negotiation with Mendoza, and assured Burghley that Walsingham was a party to the arrange- ment, though he does not seem to have appealed to Lopez for confirmation, as he might have done ; he disclosed the oflfer of the Anglo-Portuguese brother-in-law of Lopez — though he did not give his name — to kill Don Antonio, and added that, on the failure of a certain Spanish emissary from Philip to get through France to kill the Pretender, the Spanish Ministers had authorised him, Andrada, to offer Dr. Lopez himself a large sum to commit the crime. Lord Burghley was indignantly incredulous of the whole story, and sent to Andrada a scornful paper of queries.^ How could Philip think, he asked, that Andrada could be a fit envoy to England, seeing the way in which he had betrayed Antonio before, and how could he think that the Queen would receive such a man? The suggestion (of Moura) that Andrada should be sent to Parma to make terms, considering how the Prince had tricked the Queen in the former peace negotiations, was ridiculous. What was the use of the disclosure of the names of those who had been spies in England, or of his, Andrada's, proposal for England to checkmate Philip by sending a force to Portugal in September in the hood." As a matter of fact it is all confirmed by the letters of Mendoza and Moura. 1 In State Papers, Domestic, of the date. I I30 TREASON AND PLOT interests of Don Antonio ? Andrada made good and true answers to all these objections. He gave a wonderfully correct list of the Spanish spies still in England, letters from all of whom I have seen. He cited Mendoza's strong letter of recommendation of him to the King as a reason for the latter's trust in him, and protested warmly that his ultimate object was neither ambition nor greed, but to save Portugal from Spanish tyranny and avenge the death of his kins- folk who had been sacrificed to Philip's cruelty. The man was obviously a traitor, and Burghley would not believe his protestations, or for some time accept his oifers of service as a spy. He was consigned to the keeping of Dr. Lopez, in whose house he lived for the next year or so, and in June 1593 we find him living at Calais, whence he had gone from Zeeland, and although, as he says, poorly recompensed, sending to Lord Burghley such news as he could gather in the interests of England.^ He was, however, dis- contented with his pay, and in August wrote to the Lord Treasurer a letter very different in tone to those he usually sent, and evidently conveying a covert intimation that unless money was sent to him he would take his services elsewhere. " As the Queen has nothing for him to do, and Don Antonio is not in a position to support him, he is determined to go where his fortune shall guide him." Naturally his fortune guided him to the Spanish territory of Brussels, and, fortunately for himself, Manuel An- drada trod English soil no more, although upon the ^ His letters to Lord Hiirghley are in tlie Hatfield Papers, vol. iv. When he had set out for Flanders, Burghley had given him a sum equal to ,^io, and he does not seem to have received more. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 131 facts I have here set down was reared the edifice whose fall crushed Dr. Lopez and sent all England into a fresh frenzy of hate and rage against the Spaniards. Lopez in the meanwhile lived honoured and re- spected at court, a man of supposed wealth and influence; but he was already marked down for ruin. As we have seen, he had owed his advance- ment to Leicester, Walsingham, and Essex, the heads of the party determined upon open war with Spain, and lo I the discovery of this peace negotiation of Andrada exhibited him as an anxious intermediary in an arrangement with Spain. "Walsingham was dead, and could not say that he never meant the negotiations to be sincere ; they were evidently in- tended to be so by Lopez, and this was a desertion of those to whom he owed everything.^ Essex was hotheaded and vindictive enough himself, but he had now two men practically living upon his bounty to whom peace with Spain was utter ruin and whose hatred for Philip was a mania. T)on Antonio, the evicted king, whose crown Philip had wrested from his brows ; and Antonio Perez, the sleepless foe who had derided, deceived, and defied the sovereign who looked upon himself as semi-divine ; who had raised revolt against and ^ Bishop Goodman, in his " Court of James I.,'' gives us another reason for Essex's anger with Lopez. It appears that Don Antonio and Antonio Perez were carousing with Dr. Lopez at Eton, where they were all lodged whilst the court was at Windsor, and in the confidence bred of the circumstances the Doctor told his boon companions some very discreditable secret respecting the Earl's maladies. This breach of professional etiquette was immediately conveyed to Essex by the two Antonios, and "here the Earl was so much incensed that he resolved to be revenged on him, and now he began to possess the Queen that Lopez was a very villain and had poisoned others." 132 TREASON AND PLOT had humiliated the proudest king on earth before his own people. To these men, both of whose lives Philip sought, Lopez, the reputed poisoner, was dreaded and hateful in a double sense. He had been in close communication with their enemy, first, to bring about peace between England and Spain, and secondly, to assassinate by his vile art those whom Philip wished out of the way. What could save Lopez from such a combination as this, even if he had been innocent, much less if any guilt could be found beneath all this mysterious intriguing ? Either from the spying of Essex's creatures or otherwise, it was conveyed to the Queen by the Earl in the middle of October 1595 that a certain Portuguese gentleman of rank, who had been ruined by his adherence to the cause of Don Antonio, and was then living in Lopez's house in Holborn, being discontented with his master, had determined to compass the death of Don Antonio and offer his services to the King of Spain. ^ The Queen at once gave Essex an order for the apprehension of this man, Esteban Ferreira da Gama, and the exami- nation of his papers.^ This was the first step, and Essex lost no time in making the arrest, and handing his prisoner over to his own offended sovereign, Don Antonio, who was then lodging at 1 Carleton (" Thankful Remembrancer ") says that " it was conveyed tt) the Queen that it was Ferreira's intention to go to the King of Spain accompanied by Don Manoel, the eldest son of Don Antonio, and divers other Portuguese, the purpose being for them all to submit to Philip." Such a submission was, as we shall see by the correspond- ence, at all events one of the objects of the negotiations. '^ All these men had aliases, some of them several, but I have throughout retained their true names to avoid unnecessary obscurity. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 133 Eton College/ Orders were also sent to Rye, )Sandwicli, and Dover for all correspondence arriving at those ports directed to Portuguese to be detained and read. There was no definite charge against Ferreira ; he was merely suspected of an intention to betray his master, Don Antonio ; but a fortnight after his arrest a man named Gomez d'Avila, described as a " mean, base fellow," living when at home hard by Lopez's house in Uolborn, was taken at one of the ports as he came from Flanders. Upon him was found a letter addressed to one Ferrandis, and signed Francisco de Torres. The terms in the letter were commercial, but neither the writer nor the person to whom it was addressed was known. It ran thus: "The bearer will inform your Worship in what price your pearls are held. I will advise your Worship presently of the utter- most penny that will be given for them, and crave what order you will have set down for the convey- ance of the money, and wherein you would have it employed. Also this bearer shall tell you in what resolution we rested about a little musk and amber, the which I determined to buy. But before I resolve myself I will be advised of the price thereof. And if it shall please your Worship to be my partner, I am persuaded we shall make good profit."" This was very mysterious, and no explana- tion could be got from Gomez d'Avila. But he was put in prison as a precautionary measure whilst further inquiries were being made, his arrival and 1 Sir William Waad's account in Lord Calthorpe's MSS,, vol. xxxiii. fol. 148. - Yetswirts " True Report." &c. 134 TREASON AND PLOT arrest being kept secret. About the same time a large packet of letters was seized on another Por- tuguese at Dover, addressed to a certain Manuel Luis at Brussels, and in this packet was found a letter written by Ferreira to the Spanish Secretary Ibarra, enclosing another from Dr. Lopez to Ferreira, written before the arrest of the latter, giving him news of what was passing at court, where Lopez was staying, Ferreira being at the time in Dr. Lopez's house in London. This was confirmation of the suspicions against Ferreira, but nothing else. In the meanwhile Lopez was using all the influ- ence he possessed with the Queen to secure the release of Ferreira. He told her how ungrateful Don Antonio was, not only to this good servant of his, who had sacrificed everything for him, but also to her. He (Antonio) was even now, he assured her, quite truly, again planning to go to France, and to appeal for help to other princes, as he had done before. There was, Lopez told the Queen, no person more likely to be useful than Ferreira "to work a peace between the two kingdoms, in which he (Lopez) had already laid a good foundation." ^ And if her Majesty did not desire this course, what a good thing it would be " to cosin the King of Spain by a speech uttered by himself! "^ The Queen sharply reproved the Doctor for this. She did not relish such liberties being taken with a crowned head, even that of her enemy. It was noticed, too, by courtiers that the Jew grew more and more 1 Sir William Waad's account in Lord Calthorpe's MSS. 2 Ibid. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 135 haggard and anxious, for Essex had many friends whose watchful eyes were upon him. In the meantime the "base fellow," Gomez d'Avila, was being daily pressed in Essex's house for some ex- planation of the mysterious musk and amber missive he had brought. During the time he was waiting in the chamber for examination on one occasion, he begged "an honest gentleman who happened to be there, and who spoke the Spanish tongue, to tell Dr. Lopez that he was captured." ^ This was a clue that was not lost upon Essex, to whom it was con- veyed, for hitherto there had been no mention of any connection between Gomez d'Avila and the Doctor. " The honest gentleman " shortly after- wards met Lopez in the Base Court at Windsor, and gave him the message ; whereupon it was noticed that Lopez "changed countenance."" When Gomez d'Avila saw the rack he gave further extension to the story. He had been sent, he said, by Ferreira two months previously to Brussels to one Manuel l^uis — whose real name was Tinoco — and to Secre- tary Ibarra, and had there awaited for weeks the reply which he had brought to England, the letter signed Torres being really written by Manuel Luis (Tinoco). This at once marked out Ferreira as the man to whom this mysterious musk and amber letter had really been written. Shortly before this Ferreira had taken a most unfortunate step. He was, be it recollected, only a prisoner of Don Antonio at Eton, and was under the charge of a young Portuguese servant named * Sir William Waad's account in Lord Caltliorpe's MSS. 2 Ibid. 136 TREASON AND PLOT Pedro. In order to test this lad, Ferreira asked him to beg another Portuguese, one Caldeira, who was a member of the household of the French Ambas- sador, also living at Eton College, to come and speak to him at his grated window. Caldeira re- plied that he dared not ; but as the reply proved that Pedro had given the message, Ferreira then sent him to Caldeira with a little note, praying him to see Dr. Lopez, and to warn him, for God's sake, to prevent the coming over of Gomez d'Avila from Brussels, " for if he should be taken, the Doctor would be undone without remedy." ^ The message was con- veyed to Lopez, who had not yet learnt of Gomez's arrest, and he then made his fatal mistake. Caldeira had been arrested, and was imprisoned at Ditton Park, for the lad Pedro had divulged to Don Antonio Ferreira's communication with him and Lopez. So the latter had to find another means of sending a reassuring note to Ferreira. He wrote on a little ticket, folded in a handkerchief sent from the laundry, that he had already taken steps to stop Gomez d'Avila from coming. " He had," he said, " sent twice or thrice to Flanders with that object, and would spare no expense, if it cost him ^300." ^ This little note in the handkerchief was, of course, intercepted (by the confessor in the service of Don Antonio), and when Ferreira was confronted with the information contained in it, thinking that Lopez had betrayed him, he hastened to make a declaration ' The little note also contained these words: "All the diligence that hath been used doth not condemn Dr. Lopez as yet any whit, for I have bravely diverted anybody from that." This is noted by Waad as being "very suspicious" (Lord Calthorpe's MSS, 33). 2 Ibid. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 137 incriminating the Doctor. Lopez, he said, was a principal party in the negotiations for the submis- sion of l^on Antonio's son and heir to the King of Spain. The J)octor, he repeated, had artfully secured Andrada's release from prison three years before, in order that he mio;ht so to Mendoza and deal for the poisoning of Don Antonio ; and he (Lopez) had been in the interests of Spain for years. Much of this was old news, at least to the Cecils, who had squeezed Andrada at Eye two years before, but it gave Essex some further clues. Gomez d'Avila was plied with leading questions till he confessed that when he was in Brussels he learnt that a great sum of money was to be sent to England, some 40,000 or 50,000 crowns, he thought. It was to be ad- dressed to Ferreira, and was for the purpose of buying the adhesion of Don Antonio's eldest son and his followers to the Spanish side. Ferreira being confronted with this statement, admitted its truth, and confessed that the " musk and amber " letter was really intended for him, and referred to this matter. He went further, and proposed that the plot should be allowed ostensibly to proceed, and the sum, when it came, handed over to Don Antonio himself, to be used against Spain. Don Antonio was in dire poverty, and the money would have been welcome enough, but Essex and Perez persuaded him that there was some deep mystery behind all this, which, when discovered, would do more for his cause and against Philip than could be done by the treasure. The watch upon the English ports was not slackened, and in December it met with its reward. 138 TREASON AND PLOT The Portuguese called Tinoco, otherwise Manuel Luis, came to JefFerey, the English Consul at Calais, asking for a passport and safe-conduct to go to England. He had been, he said, an adherent of Don Antonio ; he had feigned attachment to the Spaniards, and had lived in Brussels in order to obtain the release of his wife and children in Portu- gal. He was, however, disgusted with his prince, Antonio, and owed gratitude and allegiance alone to the English Queen, who had secured his liberation from captivity in Barbary. His object in going to England was to reveal to the Queen and the Lord Treasurer secrets hurtful to England which he had learnt in Brussels. Jefferey, at his request, for- warded two memorials to this effect to Elizabeth and Eurghley, and in due time a "prudently drafted " safe-conduct was sent by Sir William Waad, allowing the Portuguese to enter England without molestation, but reserved to the discretion of the Government whether he should be allowed to depart again. Tinoco, taking his safe-conduct for a full protection, sailed for England, in company with one of the Consul's servants, who took care not to let him out of his sight until he handed him to the captain of Dover Castle. Thence he was taken to court with all secrecy, expecting to be granted an interview with Lord Burghley. But, to his dismay, he was seized, searched, and placed safe under lock and key (14th January 1594). On him were found two letters, which were susceptible of sinister inter- pretation, and bills of exchange for a large sum of money. One of the letters was dated Brussels, Tjf December 1593, signed by Count de Fnentes, THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 139 the Spanish governor of Flanders, and addressed to Ferreira, who had been languishing in Don Antonio's prison for two months previously. The letter bespeaks credence for the bearer, Tinoco, and requests Ferreira, if possible, to go to Portugal, and thence to Spain, for the purpose of conferring privately with Don Cristobal de Moura, the Secre- tary of State, following his directions for the service of his Majesty. " If the shadows he speaks of," the letter continues, " have been the occasion of not entreating the commission, and if he would be informed of what has been offered, he may do it; the chief matter is the service of the king. He is to consider well, before he takes the voyage in hand, whether he can give any better order therein, but the whole is referred to him, Ferreira. ... It is important that he goes thither with the commission, for the profit that may be reaped thereby. ... As to the young gentleman, it does not seem convenient to move anything till they see his decision." ^ Ibarra's letter was similarly enigmatical. It refers Ferreira to Tinoco, who knows their decision in the affair, which concurs with his, Ferreira's, own. " He is persuaded that Ferreira will do his en- deavours, and he may be assured himself to obtain all that is to be expected of one [i.e. Philip) who can do so much, and is so willing to recompense that which is done in his service, and which is so much for the benefit of the world." The wretched Tinoco was then submitted to the searching examination of Essex, Waad, and others. What did these strange letters mean? he was asked, ^ State Papers, Domestic, ccxlvi. HO TREASON AND PLOT since Count Fuentes said that he, Tinoco, knew all about it. Tinoco told a tale to explain why he had come to England. The new Viceroy of Flanders, the Archduke Ernest, was going to invade England, and an attack was to be made upon the Isle of Wight : a Gallego priest and a Jesuit were to come across from Dieppe to kill the Queen with a " device of fire," and much more vague stuff of the same sort, was all that at first could be got from him — evidently the loose talk of the English re- fugees in Brussels.^ When he was pressed closely as to his object in going to Brussels at all from England, he prevaricated, and was tripped up again and again. But at last leading questions drew from him the avowal that he had been sent over to England to see Ferreira, and with him secretly endeavour to win Dr. Lopez to do " a service " to King Philip, presumably against Don Antonio, as Tinoco confessed that he had deserted the Pre- tender and despaired of his cause. But this avowal did not explain Fuentes and Ibarra's letters to Ferreira, and it was evident that something more was behind. Tinoco himself grew alarmed at the snare into which he had run, and wrote the next day to Cecil protesting his innocence and praying to be sent back to Flanders. He was, he says, " confused and encumbered by the cunning questions of the Earl of Essex," and had small knowledge of the language, French, in which he was examined. He came voluntarily in all sincerity to do the Queen a service, but has not been treated as he expected. 1 State Paper.'?, Domestic, ccxlvi. THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 141 He gives his word as a gentleman to serve her Majesty truly, and to send all information possible if he is allowed to go back to Brussels. His letters from Fuentes and Ibarra had, he asserted, no reference to Don xlntonio and his aifairs ; and he advises Cecil to allow Ferreira himself to go to Spain, as desired in the letters, so that he may learn the designs of Philip against England. This was written on the i6th January, and its immediate effect was to render Tinoco's prison the closer. For the "cunning questions" of the Earl of Essex had drawn from him the avowal that the main object of his voyage and of Ferreira's curious correspond- ence was to prevail upon Dr. Lopez to do " a service " to the King of Spain that had no relation with Don Antonio. Gomez d'Avila had confessed that a large sum of money was to be sent to England for something ; that he had waited two months in Brussels for a definite reply to some proposal sent by Ferreira — an inmate of Lopez's house — who had in his little note to the Doctor besought him to prevent a reply coming from Brussels or he, Lopez, would be utterly ruined, and had assured the Doctor that he, Ferreira, had not incriminated him, Lopez. The Doctor, moreover, in his little "ticket" in the handkerchief addressed in reply to Ferreira, had said that he would spend ^300 rather than the answer from Brussels came over. This seemed to prove conclusively that the Doctor was really the principal in the business, whatever it was, and Tinoco said it did not concern Don Antonio. On the ist January 1594 the blow of Essex fell upon his enemy. Dr. Lopez, the Queen's principal 142 TREASON AND PLOT physician, a court favourite and a friend of the great Lord Treasurer, found himself a prisoner. Nothing whatever of an incriminating character was found in his house ; and when he was taken before the Lord Treasurer, his son, Sir Robert Cecil, and the Earl of Essex, at Burghley House in the Strand for examination, his answers seemed so satis- factory that the Cecils, at all events, were convinced that he had no part in any sinister designs. Burghley knew, of course, that he was in communication with Spanish agents, for he had become one of his own principal spy-masters. The Cecils also knew from their examination of Andrada all about the peace negotiations of two years before, and were per- suaded that the new matter was a prolongation of the same intrigue, for the purpose of "cosining" the King of Spain and gaining knowledge of his intention. So, as soon as Sir Robert Cecil could get away from the examination of Lopez, he rode in haste to the Queen at Hampton Court, and told her how Essex had arrested her body-physician, and that on examination the Doctor had proved his innocence of offence. Elizabeth was in a fury. She had been squabbling with Essex ever since Christ- mas, and this was another grievance against him. When he appeared at court she railed at him vigorously. How dared he, " a rash temerarious youth," to bring these grave accusations of high treason, or, of sheer malice, against a faithful ser- vant of hers ? She knew that Lopez was innocent, and it touched her honour now to see that justice was done. Cecil, the prim, sly, little hunchback, whom he hated, stood by whilst the haughty THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 143 favourite was thus rebuked ; and when Essex flung out of the chamber, with flaming face and violent gesture, to snlk ior the next two days, it touched his honour thenceforward to bring the Jew Lopez to the gallows, guilty or innocent. Not a word up to this point had been said about poisoning the Queen, but in the excited state of public feeling against Spain, already described, a mere hint of such a plan attributed to Lopez was sufficient to turn every one against him. The hint was not long coming, and it came from the quarter where it might have been expected. Standen, one of Essex's Catholic spies, went to Hampton Court on the 24th January, and wrote to Bacon on the 30th an account of Lopez's first examination in London on the 2 1 St, and the Queen's rage with Essex. He then says that " Lopez had been detected of a design to poison the Queen." ^ The following day Faunt, another of Essex's hangers-on, wrote from London to Bacon, saying that " it was most true that Dr. Lopez was most deeply touched in the particular working of the Queen's destruction, and was dis- covered to have been the King of Spain's pensioner for seven years past. . . . The Queen had forbidden all access to her, except only of four persons, besides councillors and ladies." " The day before this was written Lopez was taken to the Tower, and Essex himself wrote to his spy-master, Antony Bacon : " In haste this morning. — I have discovered a most dan- gerous and desperate treason. The point of conspiracy was her Majesty's death. The executioner should have been Dr. Lopez; the manner poison. This I ' Birch. - Ihid. 144 TREASON AND PLOT have so followed as I will make it appear as clear as noonday." ^ In the meanwhile, the separate examination of all the prisoners continued. Tinoco was told that Ferreira, on a threat of torture, had charged him with high treason ; and Tinoco, in a panic, we know not how pressed or led, but determined to save his own neck by the earliest and fullest declarations, opened the flood-gates of revelation, and surpassed himself in the satisfaction he gave to Essex. On the 1 1 th February, Faunt wrote to Bacon some news he had heard secretly from Sir W. Waad about the Lopez case, which he now mixed up vaguely with the Collen, Annias, and Polwhele conspiracies, re- ferred to in the preceding chapter. Then he goes on to say : " The inquiry is still very strict, and Dr. Lopez used great arts to elude it, and swore and forswore himself for that purpose." However, he has already confessed that many letters had been sent to him from the King of Spain's Ministers with large offers, but that he had always forborne to make answer, and entered not into promise. Yet one letter was found, in which he offered all his service to the King, saying that he only stayed in England to do him some acceptable service, which, being done, he would think himself happy to retire and die in his Majesty's dominions." Lopez, he said, asserted ' Birch, vol. i. p. 152. It is not plain whence came the original hint about Lopez killing the Queen, but it seems probable that it arose out of an important exclamation which Ferreira afterwards confessed he had made to his <,'uard, the young Portuguese called Pedro, to the effect that he had no doubt tluit Lopez would poison either the Queen or Don Antonio if he was paid sufficiently for it. - Sir William Waad, in his account in the Calthorpe MSS,, speaks of " Lopez's customary awful oaths." THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 145 that all this was in pursuance of a plan he had arranged with Walsingham to gain over as a spy one of the assistants of Idiaquez, the Spanish Secre- tary of State. " But that shift," continued Faunt, " will not serve. This will prove the most resolute attempt, and most deeply advised, of the court of Spain, if Lopez be well sifted, who is a most vile person, and void of all shame and common humanity. Thus much in great secret. " ^ All this, be it recol- lected, was from the various creatures of Essex. The letter to which he refers from Lopez, offering his services to Spain, is not now forthcoming, and Mr. Faunt's hearsay assertion of its existence is not conclusive ; but there is no doubt that such letters had been written by Ferreira at Lopez's dictation. ~ This, however, is no proof that such offers as they contained related to the murder of the Queen. The first presumption, indeed, is to the contrary, as the unquestionable negotiations laid bare in the papers » Birch. '•^ Ferreira confessed on the i8th February that ten months pre- viously he had received from Lopez two letters to be delivered to Don Christobal de Moura. These letters were written by Ferreira himself, at the dictation of Lopez, and professed the latter's willingness to do all that the King of Spain desired, though, said Ferreira, tlie wording was purposely obscure. In answer, evidently, to a leading question, Ferreira confessed at the same time that, in his opinion, " the Doctor would have poisoned the Queen if required." This is an instance of the way in which the evidence was built up. From these extorted admissions to the confident statement that Lopez iiad written to the Spaniards offer- ing to kill the Queen was but a step. In the same confession Ferreira said that Andrada had told him, shortly before he left England in 1 593, that if the King of Spain wished. Dr. Lopez would poison either the Queen or Don Antonio. This speech Ferreira said he had afterwards repeated to Lopez himself, who replied, '"As for the King (Don Antonio), he shall die with the first sickness that shall happen to him, but for the Queen we have no answer as yet from the other side." See Ferreira's confession, State Papers, Domestic, and in Yetswirt's book. K 146 TREASON AND PLOT from the Paris archives I have quoted in an appendix prove that the communications between Lopez and the Spaniards disclosed therein refer to the simulated peace overtures, and also, probably, to the removal of Don Antonio by poison. Essex, Waad, and Robert Cecil (for the latter was as anxious nov^ as the Earl himself to sift the matter ; it was the Cecil method never to champion an unpopular cause) followed up ceaselessly the clues thus gained, with the object of " making it appear clear as noonday " against Lopez. Tinoco's admissions were used as levers for still further opening the lips of Ferreira ; and the two prisoners were so cleverly handled with fears of torture, and by a desire to ingratiate themselves with their exa- miners, that the story soon looked circumstantial enough to ensure the hanging of Lopez. When the evidence, such as it was, was pieced together, it appeared from the declarations that the reference to " peace " and " service " really meant the murder of the Queen by Lopez. ^ The ruby ring and the mythical " embrace " brought by Andrada to the Doctor were said to be an encouragement direct from Philip to the commission of the crime. The King, however, distrusting such a man as An- drada in so delicate a mission, had instructed ^ Tinoco confessed on 26th February : " The letters I wrote to Fer- reira by Gomez d'Avila concerning the jioint which speaketh of pearls, and the price of them, was to give him to understand that the news which he had sent that Dr. Lopez would kill the Queen were very greatly accepted, and much esteemed of Count de Fuentes and Secretary Ibarra. And touching the point concerning musk and amber, tlie Count de Fuentes did tell me that he did look for a reso- lution of the King of great importance ; and when it came tliere should be a great matter" (Yetswirt). I THE LOPEZ CONSPIRACY 147 Count Fuentes to employ Ferreira instead of him. Andrada himself, it was asserted, had written to Count Fuentes three letters, urging that the money for the service {i.e. the murder of the Queen) should be paid at once. It was not in accordance witli the Spanish principle to pay beforehand — if at all — and, according to the confessions, the matter hung fire until Ferreira was sent by Lopez to Flanders with the two letters already referred to again offer- ing his service in obscure terms. Ferreira stated that Fuentes and Ibarra instructed him to obtain a more binding pledge from the Doctor, which, how- ever, he was unable to do. Tinoco was then sent by Ferreira from London to Brussels and Antwerp, where Andrada was then staying. At Fuentes' instance Tinoco persuaded Andrada to stand aside, whilst Ferreira acted as principal intermediary ; ^ and Tinoco then went back to England for one day only — according to his own statement — carrying grand promises and another embrace from Fuentes 1 Tinoco confessed on the 22nd February that Fuentes had sum- moned him to his house at Brussels and asked his opinion about Andrada. Tinoco's reply appears to have been unfavourable, and Fuentes's secretary had then exliibited to Tinoco three letters, which he said had been written by Andrada to him from Calais. The first letter related that Dr. Lopez had sent him (Andrada) to say that he " was determined to do such a ])iece of service to the king of Castile as thereby he (Philip) might with safety satisfy himself of the English nation. But so as the King should recompense his services with honour and favour, according to the quality thereof ; for he was old, and in many ways indebted, and would now lind rest for his old age. And declaring the quality of the service he (Andrada?) told liim (Fuentes) that Dr. Lopez bound himself to despatch the Queen by poison ; whereof it behoved him (Fuentes) to advertise the king of Spain thereof with all speed ; and he (Andrada) would attend at Calais until answer came from Madrid." According to Tinoco, it was at this point that Philip declined to proceed in such a matter by means of a person so discredited on both sides as Andrada. 148 TREASON AND PLOT to Lopez, and a letter from Moura in Spain to Ferreira, instructing him that the " treaty of peace," which Tinoco said meant the murder of the Queen, should be renewed. Tinoco then returned to Flanders and Ferreira himself kept close to Lopez, urging him to do the service required of him, and Ferreira confessed that the Doctor demanded 50,000 crowns down ; and according to the prosecution, it was the delay necessary for the return of Philip's answer to this demand that was referred to in the reply promised to be sent to Ferreira by Tinoco about the price of " pearls." Tinoco's own journey to England after Ferreira's arrest was said to have been urged by Fuentes for the purpose of encouraging the conspirators by the letters from Fuentes and Ibarra, and of exciting Lopez's cupidity by showing him bills of exchange for a large amount, which might be his after the commission of the crime. ^ It will be seen by these confessions that Tinoco's ^ avowals were all directed to prove his own innocence at the expense of Lopez and Ferreira, whilst the latter sought to shift the principal burden upon Lopez. Both the prisoners, however, admitted the main point, namely, that the conspiracy really aimed 1 Be it recollected that three years before tlie Spanish Ministers had themselves offered 30,000 for the killing of Don Antonio by Lopez. '■^ Tinoco confessed on 22nd February that Fuentes and Ibarra had summoned him to a secret chamber, and takin him and cruelly contrasted with his weak pusillani- mous paltering with the armed rebellion he had been ESSEX FLIES TO ENGLAND 357 sent to crush. His petulant complaints and accu- sations of personal enmity are scathingly rebuked. " We have seen a writing in manner of a catalogue full of challenges that are impertinent and of com- parisons that are needless, such as hath not been before this time presented to a State, except it be done more with a hope to terrify all men from censuring your proceedings." ^ He had no power, she told him, to make such terms as he had done, though now he had done so they should be respected, and she hinted more than once to him, who, to do him justice, was as brave as he was proud, that he was either disloyal or a coward. It must well-nigh have broken his heart, but it quite banished his judgment. He knew how his presence affected the Queen, and he dreamed that tears and love-lorn submission at her feet, even if he returned against her express sovereign command, would still be strong enough to overcome her indignation. But weak as she was in many things, she was strongest of all in her sense of regal duty and her personal dignity. Essex had outraged both by his perverse failure and his petulant presumption, and henceforward he must be humbled to the dust or he must die. He, poor, blind, vain- glorious creature, knew it not, but added desertion of his post to his past disobedience, and leaving Loftus and Carey to govern in his absence, he posted over to England without notice. "He never drew a sword," sneered the Irish, "but to dub knights," and, like a hasty messenger, he ran ^ Elizabeth to Essex, September 14, 1599, Irish State Papers. 2 He had given great oflfence to Elizabeth by his lavish creation of knights in Normandy and at Cadiz, and a " knight of Gales " became a 3S^ TREASON AND PLOT away before he had finished his errand." As fast as posthorses could bring him he rode to Westminster, where he learned that the court was at Nonsuch, Then crossing to Lambeth and seizing such horses as were waiting there for their masters, he sped on to the Queen's house. Lord Grey de Wilton passed him on the road, and riding ahead, was able to warn Cecil of the Earl's coming some ten minutes before his arrival. The Queen was not yet about when, at ten o'clock in the morning of Michaelmas Day, 1599, Essex alighted at Nonsuch gate. He was mud-bespattered and haggard with his headlong journey, but he waited not a moment. Pressing forward through the presence chamber and ante- rooms, none daring to stay him, he came unbidden into the Queen's bed-chamber, where her Majesty sat only half-dressed with "her hair about her face." Then throwing himself at her feet he kissed her hand and prayed for pardon. The Queen was so much taken aback that she forbore to chide him, and he went with a light heart and smiling face to scofl&ng by- word. It was felt generally that his object was to gain adherents to serve liis own ambition, but now that fifty-nine knights were added to his creations under patent in Ireland during the six months he was there, the susj^iciou was fully confirmed, since there were no feats of arms to reward. Chamberlain writes (August 23), derid- ing some of the new kniglits, and continues, " It is much marvelled that this humour should so possess him, that, not content with his first dozens and scores, he should thus fall to huddle them up by the halfe- hundreds, and it is noted as a strange thing that a subject in the space of seven years (not having been sixe moneths together in any one action) sholde upon so litle service and small desert make more knights than in all the realme besides. It is doubted if he continue in this course he will shortly bring in tag and rag, cut and long taile, and so draw the order into contempt." When he returned to England Elizabeth was with difticulty dissuaded from unmaking the knights ho had dub))e(l. ESSEX AT NONSUCH 359 put himself in order for further speech with her. An hour later he saw her again, and still no angry reproaches greeted him. At dinner his friends, reassured, flocked to him, and to them he " dis- coursed merrily of his travels," and " thanked God that, though he had suffered much trouble and storms abroad, he found a sweet calm at home." Alas ! for him, it was the calm that precedes the tornado. Cecil and his friends had stood aloof from him, and when the Earl, gay and debonnaire now, in easy confidence of his influence over the Queen, went to see her after dinner, he found her changed. With haughty severity she directed him to attend her Council and give to them an account of his proceedings in Ireland and an explanation of his disobedient return. With bowed, uncovered head and apologetic mien, he stood before the men he hated and con- temned, whilst he palliated, excused, and apologised for what he had done or left undone. That evening Essex was a prisoner under arrest, and for many days to come he stood daily before the Council, making the best of a sorry business, but full of plans still by which he dreamed of crushing at one blow these men, who were, he thought, banded to- gether to weaken or subject English Protestantism, and to ruin its strongest champion, Robert Devereux, Earl of Essex. How could he foresee that the sly little man whose brain directed the forces against him would betray and destroy his own associates, and reach lifelong power by the road that Essex himself meant to tread In the meanwhile all went merry as a marriage bell with the Cecil party ; and the day 360 TREASON AND PLOT after Essex's arrest, "Mr. Secretary" gave a great banquet, at which were gathered the Howards and Talbots, Arabella's uncle Shrewsbury, Cobham, Gray, Carew, and Ralegh — all the men against whom the fallen favourite had raged and stormed in his pride. CHAPTER XI The aspect of the succession question in England — Cecil and Essex — Negotiations for peace with Spain — Renewed alarm of Spanish invasion in England — Measures for defence — Probable intentional exaggeration of the fears, for political reasons — James continues to intrigue with the Catholics for support — The Pope's offer to him — Fitzherbert's address to Philip respecting the Scottish advances — Lord Semple's mission to Madrid— The future religion of England trembling in the balance. The two great conspiracies for securing the English succession were now bracing themselves for the final struggle. The Queen's age had only increased her determination that during her lifetime no successor to her throne should be acknowledged ; but it was obvious to Englishmen of all sorts that some arrange- ment must be made for the great change before it happened, unless England was to be plunged at the critical moment into the vortex of civil war, and perhaps foreign invasion. The centres of the two conspiracies, which we have seen were formerly in Madrid and Rome respectively, had now (1599) gradually changed their position to England itself. This much, at least, had been gained by the proved ability of Englishmen to defend their country against foreign invasion or dictation, and by the increased patriotic pride which the brilliant reign of the Queen had infused into all of her subjects ; but, neverthe- less, each of the two factions which divided the English court still looked for outside support and alliance to strengthen and justify its action. 362 TREASON AND PLOT It is extremely difficult to define clearly the exact limits of each conspiracy ; for there were many sub- sidiary and personal issues, abundant lying and betrayal on either hand, and, so far as was possible, a studious concealment of action and aim. But, generally speaking, the patent impotence of Spain now to enforce her religious views upon England, and the erection of the Belgic provinces into a separate sovereignty, had caused a tendency to re- sume in England the old political line of cleavage, which had been obscured for many years by the new religious groupings consequent on the Reformation. The moderate or old-fashioned English element, the germ of the present Conservative party, largely influenced by respect for the past and by Catholic traditions, looked again to a close Belgic alliance, which necessarily mean either a mild tolerant Catho- lic supremacy like that existing in France, or the continuance of the Anglican establishment with such toleration to Catholics as was allowed by Henry IV. to the Huguenots. Of this party, which included the heads of the old nobility, the Howards, Stanleys, Talbots, Grevilles, Brookes, Somersets, Herberts, and their like, Sir Robert Cecil was supposed to be the head, or at least the brain ; but whatever may have been the ultimate object of most of the members, it is certain that Cecil himself never intended that the Anglican Church as established should be over- thrown or radically altered in a Catholic sense, as a result of any action of his party. Although nearly all English Catholic priests and laymen — except only the Jesuit faction — belonged to this group, Cecil in his official relations always maintained an attitude TWO DYNASTIC FACTIONS 363 of strict reserve, not to say severity, towards the pro- fessors of the old religion ; and, as we have seen by Father Watson's letter on page 315, had expressly repudiated even the word "toleration" in connection with them.^ The other dynastical conspiracy was headed by Essex, who had succeeded his stepfather, Leicester, in his position as leader of the men professing the newer or reformed ideas. Around him were grouped the Puritan elements, which resented the retention of Catholic forms or traditions in Anglican worship, and sought to perpetuate the alienation from Spain and Spanish Belgium, which had been brought about by Philip's arrogant attempt to dictate the religion to England. To semi-Huguenot France and Presby- terian Scotland this party naturally turned its eyes : and, broadly, in politics Essex stood for a French- Scottish alliance, and Cecil for a Belgic-Spanish alliance. The issues were, however, infinitely com- plicated by the self-seeking attempt of James VI. to intersect both conspiracies by his own lines of intrigue. He was tireless in his attempts to obtain ' Many instances of this are seen in Cecil's treatment of the Catholic* whom he employed as spies. The priests of the " loyal " faction were tFL-ated almost as harshly as the Jesuit fathers. Writing to Sir Henry Neville in Paris, with reference to apj^lications of Cijarles Paget, Sir Thomas Tresham, Father Cecil, and other repentant refugees, for par- don and permission to return to England, Cecil says that he knows very well that if they have fallen out with the Jesuits, it is from no love of England, but to work their own ends. If the refugees like to do any real service to show their hearts are changed, their cases may be considered ; but they need not hope for pardon on mere professions or upon sending information which may be false. Cecil speaks of all these refugee Englishmen in the most offensive terms. He calls his namesake, John Cecil, who for ten years past had given him informa- tion, " a lewd priest with an honest name " (see Winwood Papers). 364 TREASON AND PLOT some recognition of his right from Elizabeth ; but when he at last understood that neither cajolery nor menace could win that from her, he mad(^ efforts to obtain the countenance of the principal statesmen of her court. The Abbot of Kinloss (Edward Bruce), his agent for the purpose in England, could triumphantly point out to Catholics that James's actions showed that he was on their side. His agents in Rome, and the Archbishop of Glasgow in Paris, were busy impressing the same fact upon the non-Spanish Catholic powers ; whilst Denmark and the German princes, as well as the mass of English Protestants, were attracted not only by the strength of his legal claims, which were laboriously enforced by means of pamphlets and treatises, but they were also urged to support him as the main bulwark against renewed Spanish ag- gression. Essex himself, James's principal hench- man in England, Puritan though he was, and gravely apprehensive of the King's dallying with Papists, attracted Catholics to his side by promising toleration for their religion. On the other hand, the moderate party of Cecil was gaining Puritan sympathy by their severity towards Catholics and their rejection of all suggestions of toleration. Personal rivalry and jealousy further complicated an already involved position, and finally, each party for its own ends chose to blacken its opponents by attributing to them objects which they must have known to be false. They have thus led astray not only their own generation but all the generations that have succeeded them. The Essex party, for instance, loudly proclaimed that Cecil TWO DYNASTIC FACTIONS 365 and his friends, especially Cobham and Ralegh, had arranged to sell England to the Infanta, which at the time was absurd, and is now, perhaps for the first time, demonstrably untrue; whilst the "mode- rates " cast upon Essex the reproach that he sought by armed force to seize the crown of England for himself.^ Outside the two main conspiracies there was the old irreconcilable Jesuit-Spanish party, greatly re- duced now by its unpopularity in England and by repeated failure, but still bragging about the thrusting of the Spanish form of Catholicism with a Spanish monarch upon England, with or against her will. After the death of Philip II. this party in Spain itself temporarily flared into hope again. ^ Even James seems to have been persuaded that this was the case soon after Essex's death — though he must have changed his mind when he became King of England — for he always called Essex '■'■my martyr" and loaded his son with favours, whilst he disgraced Ralegh and Cobham. In the often printed letter, written by the Earl of Northum- berland to James in 1601 (Hatfield Papers), assuring him of the general consensus of feeling in his favour amongst all classes in England, the Earl refers to a remark made by James, that he " had lost no great friend " by Essex's death, and confirms this opinion as follows : "Although he was a man endued with good gifts, yet was his loss the happiest chance for your Majesty and England that could befall us ; for either do I fail in my judgment, or be would have been a bloody scourge to our nation. . . . Did he not decree that it was scandalous to our nation that a stranger should be our king? Was not his familiarity with me quite cancelled when he discovered my disposition leaning to your right, and that I was not to be led by his fortunes ? . . . How often have I heard that he inveighed against you amongst such as he conceived to be birds of his own fortune? Did his soldier- followers dream but of his being King of England ?" Northumberland continues in this strain for several pages ; but he was a poor, mean- spirited creature, and was evidently currying favour for himself by blackening his dead brother-in-law, so that his evidence against Essex does not go for much, if even the writer was honestly stating his conviction. 366 TREASON AND PLOT The young King, whose education was narrow and bigoted, dreamed of carrying with a rush the great object at which his father had toiled fruitlessly for so long. Spain was to resume her greatness and her strength under a new energetic ruler, and the Catholic supremacy was to make her predominant in the world. The Adelantado and the Count de Fuentes, hot-headed fanatics both, were for ever breathing fire and fury against the heretics ; the bishops and Jesuits who flocked about the court were as sanctimoniously truculent as ever, and, for a time, the conquest of England seemed easy and imminent to these extremists. But in the course of our story we shall see that sloth, waste, and a love of pleasure, joined to the utter prostration and cor- ruption that had overtaken the people, paralysed the action of Spain more effectually even than the niggard centralisation of the greater Philip had done. Tyrone's success introduced another disturbing- element in the situation, and each party had to take into consideration the force that he might bring- to bear for or against them. For purposes of his own, the Irish chief had elected to fight under the Catholic banner, and to obtain such help as he could from Spain ; but, as we have seen, that did not prevent Puritan Essex and James from courting him in the interests of the latter, whilst to the " moderate " party in England, Catholics though most of the leaders were, it was absolutely vital to crush Tyrone utterly, cost what it might ; for they knew that the victory of Catholic rebellion in Ireland by Spanish arms would have meant the downfall THE ENGLISH PARTIES 367 of the potent edifice of English independence, which the Queen and they had so strenuously built up. Tyrone might speak fairly now, but neither he, nor Essex, nor James, could hold the Spanish avalanche if once it was started, crafty as they all thought themselves in their efforts to harness it to their own chariot. This was the position of affairs when, amidst squabbles and jealousies in- numerable, Essex went to Ireland in the spring of 1599. As a result of the approaches made to him, and in accordance with the letter he wrote to Philip II. (page 330), on his assumption of the sovereignty of Flanders for the Infanta, the Archduke Albert sent a confidential agent, named Coomans, to England in the beginning of 1599, to discuss with Cecil the possibility of a peace being made. He was sent back with amiable though vague expressions of a desire to come to terms, if conditions could be arranged.^ It was known, however, that nothing really would be done until the Archduke had seen his new brother-in-law, Philip III., and a basis for future relations had been laid.^ It was Cecil's policy, whilst keeping even his own agents in the dark as to his desire for peace, to give out generally that Spain was seeking a modus vivendi; the object being partly to encourage the " moderate " section and the mercantile interests in England, and partly to render more pliable the King of France, whose naval activity and growing friendship with Spain ^ Cecil to Sir Henry Neville, July 2 (Winwood Papers). 2 The Archduke had gone to Spain to marry the Infanta, which he did in May, embarking at Barcelona for Italy on his return in June. 368 TREASON AND PLOT were causing no little uneasiness to Elizabeth.^ It was important at the same time for Cecil and his friends not to appear desirous of peace, for fear of alienating the Puritan party in England, and the Dutch, who had undertaken to retain a strong fleet on the coast of Spain during the summer (1599) to prevent any attack upon England whilst the prin- cipal national forces were in Ireland. To keep the matter of peace alive, agents came with letters to the Queen and Cecil on the subject in June from the Archduke's locum tenens in Flanders, the Car- dinal Andrea ; but it was still policy for Cecil to hold back,'^ for great things were then expected of Essex in Ireland, and the Dutch had promised to commit vast devastation on the shipping and ports of Spain, either of which events would have enabled better terms to be made for England. Suddenly, however, in July a change came over the appearance of affairs. The spies of Cecil had continued to report the great naval and military preparations in Spain and the vapouring of the revived militant party there ; but with the Dutch 1 See correspondence in Win wood Papers, Part i. - The answer sent by the Queen to Coo mans' advances was thus reported by the Venetian ambassador in France to the Doge. " She declares that she is equally desirous of peace ; but that she cannot initiate nor conduct any negotiations, for she has no guarantee that the terms agreed upon would be maintained, as she is not dealing with a person of sufficient authority. She repeats what she said before, that whilst she was negotiating with the Duke of Parma, she found herself tricked, for the Spaniards attacked England with a powerful fleet (1588). But still she promises not to lose time, but to make inquiries as to the opinion of the States (Holland), and in tliis way she puts off the business, because she wishes to see whether Flanders is to be entirely separated from the Spanish crown (Venetian Calendar. Con- tarini to the Doge, April 25, 1599). ANOTHER SCARE IN ENGLAND 369 fleet threatening the Spanish coast and the known disorganisation of the kingdom, it was concluded that the armaments were intended for defence alone; and so it happened that while Essex and the soldiers were on their weary and barren march through Munster the Queen's navy was mainly laid up in dock. This being the case, early in July Cecil received news that the Dutch fleet, bent mainly upon plunder, had sailed away to Madeira, leaving the Bay of Biscay and the Channel open for a Spanish fleet, and at the same time intelligence arrived that an agent of the King of Spain had gone to request the Governor of Brest to allow a Spanish fleet to anchor in his port. This news fell in London like a thunderbolt. Couriers were sent flying to France to beg the King not to shelter the enemy's vessels, and from end to end of England the country was aroused to its defence. " It was little expected," wrote Cecil to the English Ambassador in France, " that those who published so brave a purpose to interrupt all supplies for Spain, ^ and to keep the coast blocked up from trade, would now thus, fondly and mechanically, put all upon a journey to the islands for wines and sugars. Now that Spain is clear of them (i.e. the Dutch), and hath in readiness forces to have defended, he (the Adelantado) may in all probability convert some hitherward." ^ Cecil ^ Vast cjiiantities of corn and other provisions, &c., had been sent from France to Spain. Elizabeth had bound herself to respect the French flag, but she did not bargain for this, and bitter complaints were made by Neville to Henry IV., whilst an acrimonious dispute proceeded on the same subject with the French Ambassador in England (see Correspondence in Win wood Papers). 2 Cecil to Neville, July 14, 1599 (Win wood Papers). 2 A 370 TREASON AND PLOT had fall warrant for fearing this from the reports of his agents. One usually very well informed spy wrote to him (July 24) in the most alarming strain from Lisbon. The Adelantado, he assured him, was bound for England or Ireland. He had just arrived in Lisbon with 35 ships from Andalusia, and after embarking in the Tagus Spanish and Portuguese troops to the number of 4000, was to proceed to Corunna. He had already 6000 soldiers on board his fleet, almost as many as his ships would carry, but (and this is a good instance of the complete want of organisation existing) the large number of German and Flemish vessels that had been seized some time before to carry the additional troops and stores had all bribed their way out and had escaped. Still his force was formidable, for there were 14 galleys and other ships ready to sail — though short of artillery — at Corunna and Ferrol, and at least 8 fine new galleons in the Biscay ports. In all, the spy reported that the fleet would consist of 35 galleons, 22 galleys, 15 or 20 caravels, and 35 other vessels, and the armed forces to land would reach 25,000 soldiers. This was the most formidable force that had been organised since the Armada, if it had been as effi- cient as was reported on paper ; and there was, for the first time since 1588, a momentary revival of the crusading spirit that had given Spain force in years gone by. *' They go forward with the old vanity of 1588, making full account of victory, and never respecting to prevent that anything should happen to the contrary. Falmouth is spoken of, yet I think it is no place for conquest, unless he first put his INVASION RUMOURS 371 men on land, and then, having fortified, go to Ire- land, and so transport some of Tyrone's people for their further strength ; but if they depend to trans- port the Irish into England, some ports of the vSevern or Welsh coast will be pretended."^ The writer, however, thinks they will first go to Ireland and laud at Limerick, and he sounds a note of alarm that a diversion or conjoint attempt at invasion will be attempted from Flanders. Above all, he says, let the Queen look to herself, for her death is daily threatened, and if it can be effected it is determined. Let the English ships, he prays, stand on the defen- sive, if they can do nothing else, "for the Spanish practices will go forward until they have either destroyed themselves or spoiled England." "All these mischievous intents began by English semi- narists and Irish bishops. Ferret out such fellows in England, for there be many of them there. The Spaniards have great hope of help from some great men there {i.e. in England), stirred up at their instigation." " The Adelantado is so stirred up against England that, though it be already late for the galleys to go out, it shall be a bad time of the year that he will refuse to go over, as by his last voyage you had had experience, if God had not pre- vented. If this summer he should be hindered, be assured of him betimes in the spring. Meanwhile all helps have been, and will be, sent to Tyrone, for upon his broken staff they hope to lay a great foun- dation to annoy, yea, to conquer England." " In Spain and Portugal the talk, of which this was ^ Van Harnack to Cecil, July 24, 1 599 (State Papers, Domestic). 2 Ibid. 372 TREASON AND PLOT a faithful echo, ran that the Queen of England was dead, and that the King of Spain would, in his clemency, not capture the country for himself, but would take advantage of the confusion to establish an English Catholic of royal blood ; " but still," said Cecil's agent, " the crown is their desire, and upon this cast of the die, he assured his master, the future of both countries depended." Almost solemnly he declares that this is Spain's last possible effort. " Here goeth the whole seal of Spain. Spoil this and wear the Spanish crown. Their sweet speeches, that they come not for conquest but to raise up the next heir that is Catholic to the English crown, are dangerous. Possibly some Jesuit persuasions have seduced the English Papists to believe it, but let them not be deceived, it is the English crown the Spaniards covet, and not religion or conscience. I fear there is some great personage already obtained unto that which the last Earl of Derby denied, though I accuse none, yet by their speeches it is a dangerous suspicion." ^ This fairly represented the inflated current ideas of the Spaniards and their English sympathisers under the hopeful influence of a new reign ; but those who held them had not the privilege, as we have, of raising the veil that covered the secret deliberations of Philip's councils, and of under- standing to the full the demoralisation, the corrup- tion, the ineptitude, and the penury that prevailed, notwithstanding the frenzy of presumption and pro- digality that had attended the King's first progress to meet his bride, under the auspices of his now ' Van Hanmck to Cecil, July 25, 1599 (Stale Papers, Domestic). ENGLISH WAR PREPARATIONS 373 all-powerful favourite, the Marquis of Denia (Duke of Lerma). The Adelantado might vapour on the quays of Lisbon or Ferrol, and Fuentes sneer at heretics in the council chamber, but the ships scattered in the various ports were mostly unpro- vided, unmanned, and unseaworthy. Where there were soldiers, arms and clothes were lacking ; stores rotted in one place whilst troops starved in another; no money could be obtained from Madrid except for wasteful shows and the endowment of monas- teries. Plague and famine were devastating the land, and Lisbon itself was a wilderness, for nearly the whole population had died or fled. But still, as Spaniards themselves did not under- stand how bad things were with them, it was not to be expected that Englishmen, whom they threatened, could discern the true state of affairs ; and the result of these alarmist reports, coming as they did when the Dutch fleet was far away, the Chan- nel undefended, the English army in Ireland, and the English navy in dock, was that an uncontrol- lable gust of panic swept over the country. John Chamberlain gives us a vivid picture of the state of affairs (August i, 1599, State Papers, Domestic) : "Upon what ground or good intelligence I know not, but we are all here in a hurle, as though the enemie were at our doors. The Queene's shippes are all making ready, and this towne (London) is commanded to furnish out 16 of theire best shippes to defend the river, and 10,000 men; whereof 6000 to be trained presently, and every man els to have his arms ready. Letters are likewise going out to the bishops and their clergy, and all the 374 TREASON AND PLOT noblemen and gentlemen hereabout, to prepare horses and all other furniture, as if the enemie were expected within fifteen days." A camp was to be held at Tilbury, as it was at the time of the Armada, the Lord Admiral Howard (Earl of Not- tingham) was appointed commander-in-chief, and his kinsman, Lord Thomas, commander of the navy ; whilst Sir Francis Vere, who had charge of the English contingent in Holland, was to be re- called with his 2000 best men. " All this noise," continues Chamberlain, "riseth upon report that the Adelantado hath an Armada redy at Groine (Corunna), of 30 gallies and ^o shippes, some say more." On the 9th August the same letter-writer describes the progress of the scare. " The newes increasing daily of the Spaniards coming, and ad- vertisements concurring from all parts of their dessigne for London (whereof the Adelantado him- self gave out proud speaches), and the day of their departure from the Groyne being saide to be appointed, at the uttermost, as Sonday last, order was geven for a campe to be raised." All the generals are named ; and each county had to muster its men under the local gentry ready to march. Twelve of the Queen's ships were hastily put into com- mission under Lord Thomas Howard and Ralegh ; and the Earl of Cumberland undertook the defence of the river Thames by means of a bridge (of pon- toons), "after an apish imitation of that of Antwerp," a little above Gravesend. That, however, after much expense and trouble, had to be abandoned, as the Thames was found to be a different sort of river from the Scheldt ; and the bridge scheme ENGLISH WAR PREPARATIONS 375 was substituted by one for sinking hulks in the fairway. " Upon Monday toward evening came newes (yet false) that the Spaniards were landed in the He of Wight, which bred such a feare and consterna- tion in this towne, as I wold litle have looked for ; with such a crie of women, chaining of streets, and shutting of the gates ; as though the enemie had been at Blackwall. I am sorry and ashamed, that this weakness and nakedness of ours, on all sides, shold show itself so apparently, as to be carried far and neere, to our disgrace, both with friend and foe." All the nobility had raised troops of horse ; and it is noticeable that the names given as having done so most liberally are mainly those opposed to Essex and the Puritans. The Lord Admiral, for instance, had raised a hundred horse ; Shrewsbury, Worcester, Northumberland, and Cecil the same ; and the Earl of Pembroke two hundred. As Chamber- lain himself saw, there was something more be- hind this than mere patriotism. The vain babble in Spain about a great " personage having been gained," was interpreted by Essex's opponents as referring to him ; and this scare was no doubt made the most of by Cecil, as a counter-demonstration to the veiled threats of Essex, about the discontent of his army at the treatment meted out to him. " But now," writes Chamberlain, " after all this noise and blustering, methinks the weather begins to cleere somewhat, for our preparations begin to slacke and not go on so hedlong as they did, and there may be hope that all should be well." On the 23rd August he reports that the alarm is now " blown 376 trp:ason and plot over," and says that even with so short a vrarning England has made a good show^ of defence. " Our navie has gone to sea prettilie strong and in goode plight for so short a warning, conteinning twenty- three shippes and pinnasses of the Quene's, twelve good marchant shippes provided by the citie and six more hired by her Majestie, with fourteen hoys well- furnished with ordnance and made for fight. Our land-forces are dayly discharged, litle by litle, and this day I thiucke will be quite dissolved. . . . On Friday there mustered 1 600 horse by St. James', and the next day 400 for the clergie in St. George's Field, yet none of the noblemen have shewed their troupes. ... If occasion had been to draw forces to a head or into campe, it is thought the first pro- portion wold have risen to 27,000 foot and 3000 horse. I assure you they were very well provided for the most part of horse armour and apparel, and wanted not their setting forth with feathers, skarfes, and other light ware. The Lord General (the Earl of Nottingham) with all the great officers of the field came in great bravery to Powles Cross on Sunday sevennight when the alarme was at the hottest and dined with my Lord Mayor. The vulgar sort can- not be persuaded but that there was some great misterie in the assembling of these forces, and because they cannot finde the reason of it, make many wilde conjectures and cast beyond the moone: as sometimes that the Queue was dangerously sicke; otherwhile it was to sJiow to some that are absent that others can he followed as tvell as they, and that if occasion he, militarie services can he as well and as redihj ordered and directed as if they were present." REAL REASON OF THE MUSTERS 377 " And now," continues Chamberlain, " in the middest of all this hurle burle here is a sudden sound of peace, and that certain fellows are come from Brussels with a commission from Spaine."^ We shall probably be safe in adopting as our own the suggestion that the nobles of the "moderate" party took advantage of the scare to read to Essex a much-needed lesson that they could appeal success- fully to force as well as he : but whilst the prompt and efficient measures of defence adopted proved that Essex, idolised as he was in London, was ven' far from l)eing the potential dictator he imagined himself, it showed also to foe as well as friend that the organisation, the resources, and the energy of England were infinitely superior at an emergency to those of Spain. We have glanced at the several ostentatious and boasting attempts that had been made since the Armada to despatch a powerful fleet to coerce England. We have heard the exalted brag- ging of the Adelantado and the haughty assurances of invincibility proclaimed by high ecclesiastics and re- sponsible statesmen; but on each occasion humiliation and disaster had been the outcome of prodigious effort, and it is abundantly evident that no fleet complete and efficient with a formidable military force could be sent out promptly from Spanish ports because of the administrative dry-rot which the centralising policy of Philip 11. had brought upon the country. What had happened before was repeated in 1599. Throughout the spring the most abject fear of an attack on the coast and shipping by an English fleet was prevalent in Spain, and false reports were fre- ^ Chamberlain to Carletou, State Papers, Domestic, August 9, 1599. 378 TREASON AND PLOT quent of this or the other important place having been sacked. The new King was away on his wasteful journey in the east of Spain, and cool- headed observers were confident that, no matter what efforts were made, the country could not even defend herself, much less attack, that year.^ But, as we have seen, when Essex and most of the English forces were in Ireland and the Dutch fleet had relieved Spain of its threatening presence, the old vainglorious spirit prevailed again, and the talk of a great fleet to attack England or Ireland under the Adelantado was believed both by friend and foe. And yet, after three months of labour and boasting, the Adelantado's fleet, badly provided, ill armed, and poorly manned, could only endeavour fruitlessly to defend the Canaries from the depredations of the Dutch ; and by the time the unfortunate Adelantado reached the Azores (September 30), his fleet was crippled by bad weather and twenty-two out of his ^ Robert Bruce, who was a Spanish agent but sold to the English, reported to Colville on his way through France from Spain (July 1599), " Notwithstanding all their preparations and fleeing bruittis, he doth assure that this year the Spanyard shall be habill to do no thing in theis parts : his resons being the fearfuU plage which is aniang thanie ; the year being far spent, and neither the galees as yet cum to places appointed nor a bastant (i.e. suthcient) army listed." Bruce proceeds to report what we already know, that Lernia was strongly opposed to any attempt at the invasion or coercion of England being made during the Queen's life, whilst the Adelantado was violently in favour of an immediate conquest. Philip was understood to side with Lerma, as he did in all things (Colville Letters, Bannantyne Club). In the same month (July 6, 1 599) Thomas Phellips, the astute spy- master, now in disgrace, wrote a very clever letter to the same effect (State Papers, Domestic). Philip III., he says, is sjjirited and eager, but he has no money to spend upon aggression at present. The Adelantado and Fuentes are " Hotspurs," but nothing will be done until the King confers with tiie Archduke, who, the writer knows for certain, desires peace. thp: adelantado fails again 379 eighty-five ships had foundered at sea.' He had failed to meet the India fleet ; he had failed to find the Dutch, and the four millions of gold ducats, wrung out of miserable Spain to pay for his fleet, were worse than wasted. As for help to the Irish Catholics, two small pinnaces with arms and money were sent to Loch Foyle, over the division of which Tyrone and O'Donnell quarrelled, but the oft-pro- mised army of conquest came not, and for another year at least the Protestants of England knew that they were safe from Spanish attack. In the meanwhile James of Scotland was striving incessantly to gain the sympathy of Catholics every- where. Now that he had humbled the Presbyterian clergy, whom he had hated heartily, and not without reason, for their arrogance and the republicanism that underlay their Church discipline, he carried his ostentatious approaches to Kome to an extent which appears almost imprudent. His eager reconciliation with the Catholic lords, his reappointment of Arch- bishop Beaton as his ambassador in France, and the violent anti-Puritan opinions he expressed in his book " Basilicon Doron," were enough, almost, to drive his Presbyterian subjects and the Puritans of England to despair. But apparently James weighed the chances well. If he could win over the English Episcopalians and moderate Catholics, who still formed the great bulk of the nation, he could afford to risk any displeasure, short of revolution, from his own Presbyterians and the English Puri- tans. Doubtless Essex and he quite understood each other, and had agreed to a similar line of ' Sorzano to the Doge, October 31, 1599 (Venetian Calendar). 38o TREASON AND PLOT action, by which they might gain partisans from the other side, whilst holding their own adherents in hand by personal, party, and national sympathies. James, at all events, was determined to be pre- pared betimes, let who would be unready. In addition to the Archbishop of Glasgow, who was authorised to tell every one that his master was really a Catholic, Lord Hume was sent to Paris and to Italy to set forth James's claims to the English crown, and to beg for recognition (May 1 599). In response to the persistent touting of Scottish agents, the Pope also sent an embassy, consisting of the visionary young poet Constable (whom we last heard of as desirous of converting Elizabeth herself) and James Wood of Bonnington, to offer James 100,000 crowns for preliminary expenses, and 2,000,000 more to maintain war with England, if he would decree liberty of conscience in his realm and declare war. The Pope also assured him the concurrence of all Catholic princes, and a further contribution of ^20,000 from the English Catholics with 20,000 English soldiers, immediately after war was com- menced. This was a tempting offer. The Arch- bishop of Glasgow fervently exhorted James to accept it, or, he said, " the Pope would know him no more, but would help some other competitor," ^ James was surrounded by Catholic influences. Jesuits, Capuchins, and Cordeliers were almost ostentatiously summoned to his court : the Papist Seatons, two of whom, at least, were Spanish oflUcers, were his close friends ; and, above all, Henry of France had sent as special ambassador ' Colville'fi Advertisements, August 18, 1599. JAMES COURTS THE CATHOLICS 381 to him at the same time, that Maximihan de Betiine, who was afterwards famous as the Due de Sully. His ostensible errand was to renew the ancient alliance between France and Scotland ; but we are told by one who was present : ^ " Monsieur de Betune, thoch he pretend no errand bot from the King his master, to veseit the King of Scotland for entertaining the auld amitie betuix the two nations, yit he is as ernist to persuade the King to embrace the Pope's offres as Boniton or Constable is, and his persuasion shall prove of no small consequence." James could hardly resist such influences as these, and he sent Constable back to Rome (via Denmark) with an acceptance of the Pope's pregnant offer ; though whether he, James, ever intended to fulfil his part of the bargain is more than doubtful. His object was probably not war, but simply to frighten Elizabeth into acknowledging him as her heir. All this under- hand dealing of James, however, was duly conveyed to Cecil by his agents (August 1599), and doubtless was one of the reasons for the sudden and formid- able warlike preparations in England already referred to as having been made in that month. Elizabeth was highly indignant with Henry IV. for his dally- ing with James's intrigues, and demanded Betune's immediate recall. The French king had every reason for preferring the succession of James to that of a Spanish nominee, but he could not afford to quarrel with Elizabeth, so Betune was instructed to return through London, in order to assure the Queen of the harmlessness of his mission : but, withal, he failed to conciliate her, and the peace negotiations with the ^ Robert Colville of Cleish, the nephew of John Colville. 382 TREASON AND PLOT Archduke's agent were now actively pursued by Cecil as a counterbalance to James's friendship with the Pope and Catholic France. But the King of Scots was determined to leave no element in Europe unconciliated. Whilst he was thus humbling himself at the feet of the Pontiff and coquetting with the King of France ; whilst he was surrounding himself with Scottish Catholics, promis- ing toleration, conciliating English moderates by his leanings to the Episcopacy, and holding the Eng- lish Puritans by means of Essex, he was endeavour- ing to prove to the new King of Spain that he was his most faithful servitor. The Englishmen who had advocated the domination of England by Spain had, for the most part, become discouraged by repeated failure. Their recommendations and prayers had been disregarded : the old King had died without forcing his beloved daughter on the English throne, and it was felt that the new King would have other objects of his own to serve. Many of the old refugees had died or had sought pardon : the Spanish pensions they had received were, for the most part, stopped, and destitution had thinned their ranks, so that now Sir William Stanley in Flanders, a few of the Jesuit priests, and such old pensioners as Colonel Semple, alone remained faithful to the idea that had in- spired the Armada. Even Father Creswell, disci- ple of Father Persons though he was, who repre- sented the English Catholics in the Spanish court, saw that the circumstances were radically changed. Thomas Fitzherbert, who had succeeded Sir Francis Engiefield as Philip's English secretary, represented the general opinions of his class in an able State JAMES'S EMBASSY TO SPAIN, 1599 383 paper/ reporting upon the King of Scots* embassy (Lord Semple) to Spain to ask for support of his claims to the English crown. In the previous pages of this book we have had occasion to see how such embassies from James had been treated in the past, and this instructive document of November 1599 marks the change that had come not only over the spirit of the English partisans of Spain, but also over the whole situation in consequence of the death of Philip 11. Fitzherbert discusses at length the possibility of James having sent the embassy to Spain, with or without Elizabeth's connivance, but with the only object of diverting the Spanish armaments against England, and he decides finally that the King of Scots is acting in good faith in asking for Spanish help to become King of England. This being pre- mised, Fitzherbert poses the question whether it is desirable or not that Philip should give him such aid, " In my opinion it is not, if it can be avoided ; but that his Majesty should make King of England a Catholic whose zeal for our holy faith is more to be depended upon. It is certain that his Majesty (Philip) has the power to make a king of England and to exclude the Scotchman, if he will deign to take the course which we have so often begged him to adopt with regard to the Infanta, but always on condition that he does it before the Queen dies, and before the King of Scotland has won over the Eng- lish Catholics, as he is now endeavouring to do, and will in future do more than ever, thanks to the ^ Fitzherbert to Lerma, November 30, 1599 (British Museum, Add. MSS. 28,420, Spanish Calendar). 384 TREASON AND PLOT delays on this side, together with his intrigues and show of favour to the Catholics, whom he leads to suppose that he is in his heart a Catholic too. But if his Majesty will not, or cannot, execute the under- taking during the life of the Queen, I warn your Lordship that after her death will be too late, as the King of Scotland will attain his object before his Majesty has time to gather his forces and prevent it. It must be borne in mind that most of the Eng- lish nobles who do not pretend to the crown them- selves, and the claimants who have no means of enforcing their claims, wnll recognise the King of Scotland more readily than any of the competitors who are their equals . . . With regard to the Catho- lics, as it is certain that none of the other claimants (who are all malignant heretics), will grant them such favourable conditions as the King of Scotland, who is moderate and now professes to be a Catholic, they will certainly join his party as soon as he enters Eng- land. Seeing the strength of his claims, the forces he has ready, his facility for entering the country, the support of Denmark, and even of the English them- selves, he will not only be stronger than any other claimant, but will carry through his design before his Majesty's forces can arrive there. ... If, there- fore, his Majesty cannot, or will not, attack Eng- land during the life of the Queen, I see no w^ay of stopping the King of Scotland from becoming monarch of both realms ; and I submit to your Lordship whether it would not be advisable for his Majesty to take the present opportunity of seeing if the King of Scotland will consent to be a Catholic. If he consent thereto, he might be aided to declare JAMES'S EMBASSY TO SPAIN 385 war against the Queen of England, on his furnishing sufficient security to fulfil his engagements towards his Majesty, and to remain perpetually the ally and friend of the Spanish crown, to which, moreover, he will be bound by the ties of gratitude, and by the fact that he is Catholic King of England and Scot- land. In this case, the cause of the alienation of England from the old alliance with Spain, I mean heresy, will have disappeared ; whilst, at the same time, the reason for the close friendship between Scotland and France (that is to say, the constant quarrels between England and Scotland) will also be non-existent, and it will behove the King of England and Scotland, whoever he may be, to renew the old connection with Spain and the house of Burgundy. ... If aid were given to the King of Scots against the Queen of England, it would be effectual in frustrating the designs of the King of France against Spain and keep them fully occu- pied, without breaking the peace which his Majesty (Philip) has made with him." This, it will be perceived, is a counsel of despair, which it would have been impossible for men in Fitzherbert's position to have given to Philip II. The recognition and promotion of James's designs on the crown of England, on his mere profession of Catholicism, would have represented a complete triumph for the " politicians " throughout Europe who had been working against Spain for that very end for fourteen years. It would have meant an abandonment of the dead Philip's and his father's life-dreams of the supremacy of Spanish Catholicism in the political interests of their house ; and though 2 B 386 TREASON AND PLOT Spain had fallen low, the ambitions of her rulers had survived their potency, material, moral, and mental. Spain was effete, but she was still tradi- tionally powerful, and her pretensions matched her traditions rather than her circumstances. So com- plete a surrender as that suggested by Fitzherbert was, therefore, not yet probable, and this seems to have occurred to the writer himself, for he hastens to keep up the hollow old pretence that it only depended upon the mere word of Philip to place the Infanta on the throne of England. " If, on the other hand," he says, " his Majesty does not wish to aid the King of Scots to become King of England, but intends to undertake the enterprise in favour of the Infanta with the ne- cessary speed (which we, the English Catholics, earnestly desire and petition him to do), I still think that great advantage may be derived from these negotiations with the Scots, which can be continued or broken off as occasion may require, and will serve to conceal his Majesty's other objects. These communications with the Scots, moreover, will arouse the suspicion of the Queen of England against the King of Scotland, and she will not trust him to help her when his Majesty (Philip) attacks England ; she may perhaps in the mean- while try to disturb Scotland . . . the effect of which might be to upset both countries to such an extent as to prevent the Queen from injuring Spain, as she usually does. His Majesty will thus fish in troubled waters, to his own benefit and her disadvantage. In any case, the least benefit that will follow these negotiations is, that the King of Scots will declare JAlMES'S EMBASSY TO SPAIN 387 himself a Catholic, if in his heart he be one (which will be no small service to God and honour to his Majesty), or else we shall strip the mask with which he seeks to deceive the Pope and others, and shall thus alienate from him the English Catholics. Finally, if his Majesty desires peace with the Queen of England, it may be assumed that, in the present state of Irish affairs, she will be so apprehensive of the result of these negotiations, and the evil that may reach her through her backdoor (as she calls Scotland), as to agree the more readily to some fair settlement." Fitzherbert finally concludes that, in any case, the Scottish envoy should be publicly honoured in Madrid, and that a Spanish embassy should be sent in return to Scotland, " with a little ready money and moderate promises of pensions to win over Scottish Catholics," who may usefully serve Spanish interests, whatever these may be ; and that, above all, an effort should be made to persuade James to pardon and restore Bothwell, then a refugee in Flanders, existing on Philip's bounty. " He is one of the principal persons in Scotland, and a near relative of the King. He has a large party who follow him in everything, as is the custom of the country, and he and his adherents alone may be instrumental in effecting what I have said {i.e. rising against James if he broke his promise to the Catholics). He is naturally a turbulent man and greatly incensed against the Kiug.^ Philip and ^ Francis Stuart, Earl of Bothwell, Lord Admiral of Scotland, was the natural grandson of James V. He made an unsuccessful attempt to seize James at Falkland in 1592, and had to fly the country. He 388 TREASON AND PLOT his Council were, for the reasons I have stated, not ready to accept Fitzherbert's first suggestion of helping James to the English crown, but they were willing to sow distrust between Elizabeth and the King of Scots by appearing to patronise the latter. So James's envoy, Lord Semple, was made much of, and sent away loaded with gold chains for him- self and fine messages for his master, whilst other emissaries from Spanish Flanders flattered James in the conviction that even Spain had been caught in his Catholic lure, and that the only remaining Catholic interest that he had to fear was now on his side.^ All the cards then seemed to be in his returned in the next year, and succeeded in his attempt, forcing James to dismiss his Chancellor Maitland, whom he considered too Catholic. By a counter-movement Bothwell was forced to fly to England and was sheltered by Elizabeth, as up to that time he had been an ultra- Protestant. When, in order to revenge himself, he entered into a league with the Scottish Catholic Lords, he found it necessary to escape to Spanish Flanders. In 1596 he sought reconciliation with Elizabeth, as he was destitute in Paris, offering to become a spy in her interest upon Spain, France, or the Scottish Catholics (Danvers to Cecil, Hatfield Papers, vol. vi., June 28). He made other desperate efforts to recover the favour of Elizabeth in 1598 through John Colville, whose opinion of his character is curious : " Albeit in one of my former letters I did write as I thought of Bothwell, being moved thereto by his terrible oaths and protestations, yet finding him still as light as a feather and more fraudf ull nor a fox, I am forced to alter my opinion, car en son fait il n'y'a ny ryme ny raison" (Hatfield Papers, vol. viii. ; see also Colville's Letters and Spanish Calendar, vol. iv.). It may be added that the Spanish envoy was not sent to Scotland as suggested by Fitzherbert, but a man was sent from Flanders in the name of the Archduke. 1 Edward Bruce, writing to Lord Henry Howard (Hatfield Papers, uncalendared, cxxxv. fol. 81), says : "My Lord Semple at his return from Spaine did acquent the King that thair was ana propos there to send ane ambassadour to this countrie, and that it was contentously much in dispute in thair Counsell ^ro H cnutru. ... So tossing these JAMES GROWS BOLDER 389 hand, and he could aflbrd to assume a tone towards Elizabeth that a few years before he would not have dared to use. He suggested to his principal nobles that they should form a " Band," ostensibly for the protection of his person, but really to enforce his claims to the English crown ; ^ and whilst he was dabbling in conspiracy with Essex and Montjoy — as will presently be related — for the traitorous use of English troops, he demanded of the Scottish Parlia- ment a liberal subsidy with the same object, for " he was not certain how soon he should have to use arms ; but whenever it should be, he knew his right, and would venture crown and all for it." " Thus, at the opening of the year 1600, the clouds lowered darkly over England and Protestantism. Essex, a prisoner, was raging and plotting, mad with spite and disappointment, ready to sacrifice loyalty, country, faith — everything, for rehabilita- tion and revenge : Tyrone, rejoicing in his hollow truce, was busy preparing for the great struggle, whilst his zealous agents in Spain were whispering to Philip's Ministers that this indeed was the opportunity for repairing all past failures, and for finally making England Catholic through Ireland. doubts to and fro they break up thair Counsell without any resolution. . . . Since this time the King protests that naither nor indirectly he never heard motion or speach of any such messenger to come unto him." This was true, but a Flemish envoy was sent by the Archduke and his wife. 1 In a letter from Cecil to his agent in Scotland, Nicholson (April 1600), he quotes James as expressing himself thus in the instrument forming the new "Band": "Divers persons upon frivolous and im- pertinent presumptions would go about to impugn his birthright, contrary to the most ancient and approved laws of both realms" (Hatiield Papers, uncalendared, vol. Ixxviii.). 2 Nicholson to Cecil, December 15, 1599 (Scottish State Papers). 390 TREASON AND PLOT James almost for the only time in his life was warlike, with, as he thought, all Catholic Europe behind him, and the English Puritans betrayed by their leader ; and the moderate Cecil party were face to face with the fact that they had been outflanked and outbidden by the King of Scots. The religion of England, which meant the fate of civilisation, was trembling in the balance. There seemed only one possible way by which the Anglican Church might be saved and civil war avoided, and that way was only possible for one man. The man was Sir Kobert Cecil, and the way, a crooked and devious one, came out straight in the end, as will be seen in the following chapters. CHAPTER XII Essex in disgrace — His attempts at reconciliation — Small Spanish help to the Irish rebels — The mission of Mateo de Oviedo, Archbisliop of Dublin, and Martin de la Cerda to Ireland— Resolution in Spain to aid Tyrone actively — Irish envoys to Spain — Helplessness of Philip and discouragement of Tyrone — Father Persons' appeals to Philijj to take a decided course on the English succession — Discussions in the Council of State on the subject — Father Cres- well's efforts in Madrid— The projects of the Earl of Bothwell — Essex and James. Abortive peace negotiations with Spain — Essex's rebellion and execution. "What! did the fool bring you too? Go back to your business." This was the greeting flung by the Queen to her trembling poet-godson, Sir John Har- rington, as he entered her chamber to pay his respects on his return to England with Essex ; one of a host of idle knights, captains, and swaggerers, who scorned to stay in Ireland longer than their lord. And when Harrington knelt to his sovereign, as she paced up and down the room in a fury, she grabbed his girdle and cried to him, " By God's Son! I am no Queen : that man is above me. Who gave him command to come here so soon ? I sent him on other business." Then, becoming some- what calmer, she told Harrington to bring for her inspection the diary she knew he had been keeping of the Munster campaign. It was never meant for her eyes, but her godson dared not refuse ; and as she read the record she flared out in anger again, and swore her awful oath, " that we were all idle 392 TREASON AND PLOT knaves, and the Lord - Deputy (Essex) worse, for wasting our time and her commands in suchwise as my journal doth write of." ^ In the meanwhile the object of all this anger was sick and sorry at York House in the custody of Lord-Keeper Egerton. Debarred from access to the Queen, and refused permission even to write to his wife, who had just given birth to a daughter, he could only profess abject submission in heart-breaking appeals to the sovereign whose former kindness to him had turned to bitter resentment. The sternness of Elizabeth and her Council against Essex at this juncture is less surprising to us than it was to most of their contemporaries.^ We know, as they did not, that the English Government were fully informed of the coquetting of James with the Pope, the Catholics, and with Tyrone, and had more than a suspicion that Essex had been in treasonable communication with both.'^ ^ Harrington's Nugce Antiques. 2 Chamberlain's letters from Court at the period reflect the bewilder- ment generally felt at the Queen's implacability against Essex. Writing on the 22nd February 1600 to Carleton he says : "You left us here with so fair weather and with so confident an opinion that all sholde go well with my Lord of Essex, and that we should soon see him a-cock- horse again, that I know it wilbe strange news to you to hear that all was but a kind of dreame and a false paradise that his friends had fained to themselves." Again on the 5 th March he speaks of Essex as being very ill, and " a man quite out of his mind." " The Bishop of Worcester preached at Court on Sonday last, made many proffers and glances in his behalf as was understood by the whole auditorie and by the Queene herself, who presently calling him to reckoning, he flatly foreswore that he had any such meaning." ^ This idea was encouraged by Tyrone's constantly expressed par- tiality for Essex, which greatly angered the Queen. Tyrone, amongst other things, said that he would never draw the sword against Essex, whereupon the Queen wrote to Fenton (November 5, Irish State Papers) : " That Tyrone should forbear to draw his sword against our DISGRACE OF ESSEX 393 They did not yet know the extent to which his disloyalty had reached : that was to come out in the helter-skelter rush to confess first and most fully which overtook Essex and his friends when their plot had failed a year later. Then it was to come out that Essex had suggested to his father-in- law, Sir Christopher Blount, and his friend the Earl of Southampton, whilst he was yet in Ireland, to bring over 4000 of the Queen's troops to England without authority, "with the full purpose to right himself by force of such wrongs as he complained of receiving here (in England) in his absence," ^ which, says Blount, both he and Southampton opposed. Essex had many friends and was greatly beloved by the populace. It was hardly likely that his harsh treatment and present suffering on what appeared publicly to be inadequate grounds should not pro- voke some attempt at remedy. The Queen was so jealous of any one having access to him, that most of his relatives retired to the country, to remove themselves from suspicion, and even " his servants dared not meet or make merry lest it might be taken ill." But still projects were not wanting for his rescue. Old Sir Christopher Blount, who had ad- vised him when he left Ireland to bring a sufficient number of adherents with him to prevent his arrest by force, was now for seizing him out of custody and carrying him into Wales, guarded by a squadron of cavalry ; but this was too bold and risky a course ; Lieutenant rather than against us, we shall take ourselves much dishonoured, and neither value anything that shall proceed from him on such conditions, nor dispose our minds to be so gracious to him hereafter." ^ Confession of Sir C. Blount, Hatfield Papers, Ixxxiii. 394 TREASON AND PLOT for the Queen was in no humour to be trifled with, and a more secret but no less dangerous course was adopted. A few days after Essex's arrival, Lord Mont- joy, who was deeply in love with the Earl's sister, came to Essex House, where the ruined gambler, Earl of Southampton, had rooms, and told him that even before Essex had returned from Ireland he had seen that his disgrace was impending, " and desiring to save him, if it mought bee, he (Montjoy) had sent a messenger to the King of Skottes to wish him to bethincke himselfe, and not suffer, if he could hinder it, the government of this State to be wholly in the handes of his enemies ; and if hee (James) would resolve of anything that was fitt, he should find him (Montjoy) forward to do him right, as far as he mought with a safe conscience and his duty reserved to her Majestie." ^ James sent a prompt but timid verbal answer to the effect that "he would think of it, and put himself in readiness to take any good occasion." This, however, was not sufficient for Montjoy, who thereupon sent a bolder suggestion to him. He was destined, he said, to go to Ireland as Lord-Deputy, and when he was there he would at convenient time declare himself and place the English army at James's disposal. With half the troops he would have, he said, he might " doe that which was fitt in establishing such a course as should be best for our country." This proposal was backed by a letter from Southampton to James offering his services on his behalf. After some delay, the King * Confession of the Earl of Southampton, Hatfield (imcalenilared), Ixxxiv. (Printed as an Aiipendix to the Letters of Cecil and James, Camden Society.) TREASON AT WORK 395 of Scots signified that " hee lyked the course well, and would prepare himself for it ; " but it is very evident that James was lukewarm. The encourage- ment and money he was getting from the Catholic Powers and his warlike talk were intended by him as a means of forcing Elizabeth to acknowledge his heirship ; he had no real intention of precipitating events by commencing war, and certainly not to participate in a treasonable rising in England, which must necessarily turn a large number of his future subjects against him for the sole benefit of Essex. The friends of the latter gradually understood this, and dropped James for the present out of their plans. Sir Charles Danvers thought that the Eng- lish army in Ireland under Montjoy would be suffi- cient of itself to force Essex upon the Queen and destroy the Cecil party. Essex himself, now a prisoner in his own house, ^ approved of this idea, and Southampton was sent to Ireland to propose the matter to Montjoy. But responsibility had sobered the new Viceroy, and "hee utterly rejected it as a thinge which hee could no way thinke honest, and dissuaded me (Southampton) from thinking any more of such courses." All this, although perhaps suspected by Cecil, was unknown to the Queen at the time, and in pity for her late favourite's despairing state and dangerous illness, on more than one occasion she seemed in- clined to relent towards him. Once, indeed, when a consultation of physicians had pronounced him to be dying she had sent him a message of comfort, 1 He had been transferred thither from York House on the 19th March 1600. 396 TREASON AND PLOT saying, with tears in her eyes, that if it were con- sistent with her honour she would visit him. But the mood soon changed. She wished to correct, not to destroy, she told Francis Bacon ; but it needed all the reasoning of the jurists and the abject prayers of the prisoner to dissuade her from submitting Essex to the tender mercies of the Star Chamber. At length a commission of the Privy Council was appointed to inquire into his conduct and to hear his defence, with power not to sentence, but to cen- sure. As usual, the Crown lawyers, amongst whom, to his eternal shame, was Francis Bacon, were viru- lent and grossly unfair in their attacks upon the accused, whilst Essex, pathetically eloquent, broken in health and heart, drew tears from eyes more accustomed to frowns by his pleading ; the result of the inquiry being the suspension of the Earl from all his offices, and his remaining under arrest during the Queen's pleasure.^ Cecil through all this was prudently moderate ; it was clear that Essex's temper would ruin him without much aid from his oppo- nents, and though Ralegh vindictively urged seve- rity," the Earl was liberated at the end of August, ^ The trial or inquiry took place early in June. Bacon's account of the proceedings will be found in his works (Montagu). 2 This famous letter from Ralegh to Cecil, which has so often been misinterpreted to mean the writer's desire for Essex's execution after his rising, bears no date ; but the context shows it to have been written at the period now mentioned. " If yow take it for a good councell to relent towards this tirant, yow will repent it when it shal be too late. His mallice is fixt, and will not evaporate towards any your mild courses. For he will ascribe the alteration to her Majestie's pusillani- mitye, and not to your good nature, knowing that yow worke but uppon her humour, and not out of any love towards him. The less yow make hyme the less he slialbe able to harme yow and yours. If her Majestie's favour fail hyme, he will ngain decline to a common IRELAND STILL IN REVOLT 397 but was still forbidden to appear at court. He professed a desire to retire from public life and live away from London ; but it is highly probable that at this juncture he made his way unbidden into the Queen's presence at Greenwich, trusting to his old fascination to regain her love/ If so, he was de- ceived, for she thrust him from her presence with scorn and resentment, and thenceforward his heart had no room for other feeling but hatred for her and those who he thought had stolen her love from him. All his hope of regaining his mistress's favour was abandoned, and " his speeches," as Harrington said after an interview with him, " of the Queen become no man who hath mens sana in covpore sano." No sooner had Essex fled from Ireland than Tyrone began to haggle about the terms and re- newal of the truce. He would have nothing to do, he said, with any Minister of the Queen but Essex ; he must, he declared, consult O'Donnell, Avho dis- approved of peace altogether, and he must include the other rebels in the truce ; but finally a renewal of six weeks was agreed to. Truce or no truce, however, Leinster was being ravaged still, and Munster, outside of the garrisons and Lord Barry's lands, was in open rebellion. The great territorial jMunster chiefs, Florence M'Carty More and the Earl of Desmond (.James FitzThomas Fitzgerald), person. For after revenges, fear them not." (See Edwards' " Life and Letters of Raleigli," and " Sir Walter Raleigh," by the present writer.) ^ See Devereux's " Lives of the Devereux Earls of Essex." The evidence as to Essex having seen the Queen at this time is slight. It depends mainly upon a remark contained in a letter subsequently written by the Earl to Elizabeth, to the effect that she had by her voice commanded, and by her hands thrust him out of her presence. 398 TREASON AND PLOT were re-established by Tyrone ; and Connaught since Sir Conyers Clifford's defeat and death was at O'Donnell's obedience. Thus Tyrone could afford to speak haughtily to the Queen's commander, the Earl of Ormonde. The terms of the truce, he com- plained, were being violated by the English, and he threatened that, after a fortnight longer, " I will, for God and my country, do the best I may against enemies and tyrants." " I wish you to command your secretary to be more discreet," wrote the Irish chief to Ormonde, " and to use the word ' traitor ' as seldom as he may. By chiding there is little gotten at my hands." ^ All this made it obvious that further parley would end in no good. " To use her name to so odious a traitor," ordered the Queen, " no more than to cast pearls before swine," and Lord Montjoy was in- structed to make ready in England to crush Irish rebellion once for all, cost what it might. Garrisons were to be established everywhere throughout Ire- land and no further truce or quarter was to be given to Tyrone." An army of 12,000 foot and 1400 horse were to be at the new viceroy's disposal, and the ^ Tyrone to Ormonde, October 30, 1599, Irish State Papers. 2 Although Cecil was even blasphemously indignant — on paper — at Tyrone's assertion at this period that the Government hiid plotted to have }iim murdered, there is now no room to doubt that such was the case. The Irish State Papers disclose that at various times Lord Borough, Sir Geoffry Fenton, the Earl of Ormonde, Sir Robert Cecil, and the Queen herself countenanced the assassination of Tyrone, and Ralegh goes so far as to defend the goodness of such a course in a letter to Cecil (October 1598). The Carew Papers and " Pacata Hibernia" also prove that murder was a regular instrument of English policy in Ireland, and Sir George Carew quite coolly mentions to Montjoy the despatch of a man to Spaiu to kill O'Donnell, who had fled thither (Carew MSS., October 1602). MUNSTER IN REBELLION 399 blow, it was agreed, must be struck at the rebel before the Spaniards could come to his aid in force. It was felt even in England now that the nerve- lessness hitherto shown in the dealings with Tyrone could not fail to encourage the new King of Spain to send the powerful aid for which Irish churchmen and chiefs had been praying so long and so earnestly. The adhesion of Munster especially to the rebellion was seen to be the great peril in this connection. It was perhaps the most fervently Catholic part of Ireland ; its splendid harbours were the easiest of access from Spain, and the re-erection of its native southern princes, McCarthy More and Desmond, had given a temporary appearance of national solidity to the Irish cause. For this reason Tyrone himself attached the greatest importance to fomenting the rebel cause in Munster, which became in consequence the prin- cipal battle-ground upon which finally the cause of Catholic supremacy in England, Scotland, and Ire- land was to be fought out to the bitter end. The Geraldines in exile and the crowd of Irish priests in Spain continued to beg fervently for aid to their cause. Soon after he had arranged the truce with Essex, Tyrone had sent yet two more emissaries to plead his cause with young Philip ; and hopeful messages and promises were again sent back to Ireland and made the most of by the ardent Celts who carried them. But still the habit of long de- liberation weighed heavily upon the Spaniard, and old Philip's love for infinite information dwelt in the statesmen who had sat at his feet. So, instead of a powerful fleet for which the Irish looked, there sailed into the bay of Donegal in April 1600 a ship 400 TREASON AND PLOT carrying some presents of money and munitions and a Spanish friar, Mateo de Oviedo, whom the Pope had appointed Archbishop of Dublin, and with him came an experienced soldier, Captain Martin de la Cerda, to inspect and report to the King upon the military position of Tyrone. The new Bishop was delighted with his foreign flock. Writing to his King from Donegal (April 24) he assured him that he had in Ireland "the bravest and most faithful vassals that any king could have, such indeed, that if they were not already devoted to Spain it would be neces- sary to obtain their adhesion by all possible means." The meeting of chiefs in the monastery of Donegal was less optimistic now than when Captain Cobos had gone thither four years before. " When we arrived empty-handed only to repeat again the old pro- mises, they were overcome with sorrow and dis- may. . . . Although O'Neil and O'Donnell are full of courage they cannot prevail over the other chiefs, who fear the long delay in the arrival of succour, and suspect that they are being played with. We have done our best to stiffen them by every possible argument . . . and again promised that help should be sent with all speed. This has tranquillised them somewhat, and they have promised to wait for five months, as they think that they cannot, in any case, hold out longer than that without help, at least in money to pay their men. They have done great things last summer, O'Neil having overrun all Munster and submitted it to your Majesty, whilst O'Donnell has subjected Connaught." Tyrone, the Archbishop informed Philip, had almost gained over the Earl of Essex, and had recently refused the sur- SPAIN AND THE IRISH REBELS 401 render of Cork, as he could not hold the city without the Spaniards. "These sixty gentlemen," he con- tinues, " met in this Monastery of Donegal and discussed matters, not like savages, but like prudent men. They received the chains and your Majesty's portraits with great ceremony, saying that they would wear no other chains nor bonds than those of your Majesty. They are very grateful for the arms, munitions. &c., and I, for my own part, humbly supplicate your Majesty to bear in mind the importance of this business. With 6000 men you may carry through an enterprise which will bridle English insolence in Flanders and secure Spain and the Indies from future molestation." ^ Whilst the Archbishop remained at Donegal as Philip's representative, Don Martin de la Cerda hur- ried back to Spain, equally impressed with the great results that might now be obtained by the sending of timely assistance to Tyrone. W^ith him he carried fervent letters from the Irish chieftains to the Spanish king. That signed jointly by Tyrone and O'Donnell is the most important. They were, they said, in the last extremity. Their estates, men, and resources were exhausted ; and as the Spanish aid is delayed from day to day, after so many messengers and letters have been sent, thev are sure that all spirits must fail, and they will have to give way, unless the Spanish succour reaches them this year {i.e. 1600). Without it, all is lost. Don Martin de la Cerda takes a schedule of their requests, and of the money needful, if the army cannot possibly come this year. They have placed the chains and portraits ^ Simancas (Spanish Calendar, vol. iv.). 2 C 402 TREASON AND PLOT round their necks in token of Philip's favour, and they fervently pray him not to forsake them and the Catholic cause. " God knows, if it had not been for the service of God and Spain, they would not have undertaken the war at all, as they might have lived in peace." ^ Above all, they beg that Maurice Geral- dine, heir of Desmond, now in prison in Lisbon for participation in a riot there, should be released and be sent to Ireland with the Spanish expedition, as well as all the Irish bishops and men of rank in Spain and Flanders. As a further pledge of Tyrone's faithfulness to Philip, he sent with La Cerda Henry O'Neil, his son, to be educated in the Spanish court.^ A few days before these reports arrived in Spain, Philip's Council had exhaustively considered the question of Ireland, in consequence of a letter sent from Flanders by the Archduke Albert on the sub- ject. Tyrone, apparently in despair of getting a prompt decision from Spain, had appealed to the Archduke in March. The Irish, he assured him, had sustained the war, and had routed the English, in the confident expectation that the long-promised ^ Simancas (Spanish Calendar, vol. iv.). 2 The Archbishop of Santiago wrote to Philip III. (May i8, 1600), saying that, in accordance with the King's order that he was to welcome and assist any person sent from Ii'eland by the Spanish Archbishop of Dublin, he had received at Santiago young O'Neil and his attendants, " welcoinin Isabel Clara Eugenia, the eldest daughter of Philip, was, it will be recollected, married to her cousin, the Archduke, and was with him joint sovereign of Flanders. ^ Simancan MSS., Spanisli Calendar, vol. iv. THE ENGLISH SUCCESSION 413 up the Belgic provinces to Philip. This, although only two members seemed to see it, was sufficient to render the whole plan nugatory. The Infanta was not likely to give up the .State she had inherited for one she would have to conquer and hold by force of arms ; whilst the main attraction to Englishmen of any such solution as that proposed was the cer- tainty of a close union between Flanders and England, always a necessity for both countries. The despatches from the Duke of Sessa which had given rise to this discussion are more important for the elucidation of an obscure point in English history than for the inept, self-destructive, decision just described. Father Persons assured the Duke that if action were taken promptly, " not only Catholics, but also many heretics will flock to his Majesty's side ; even the principal councillors, such as the Lord- Admiral, the Lord Treasurer {Buckhurst), and Secretary Cecil. It is impossible now to say how far Father Persons was warranted in making this state- ment ; but it is evident that communications had passed between a group of English noblemen and his agents,^ because in his list of possible candi- dates as alternatives to the Infanta proposed by the English Catholics, he mentions the Duke of Savoy, whose wife (a daughter of Philip II.) had recently died ; and suggests that he should marry Arabella 1 It is likewise very significant that at this period (July 1600), Cobham and Ralegh, who were afterwards sacrificed for having plotted with Spain against James, had been sent by Cecil to Flanders, ostensibly for the purpose of informing Lord Grey that the Queen was relenting towards him. It is quite within the bounds of probability that communications then Dassed between them and the English refu- gees with regard to the succession. 414 TREASON AND PLOT Stuart ; and more curious still, the only English nobleman suggested in the list was the Earl of Worcester,! " a Catholic of good parts, who, although he has no claim to the crown, might marry the daughter of the Earl of Derby." These suggestions could not have been made without the connivance of the persons mentioned. Still the English Catholics for whom Persons spoke ex- pressed their great preference for the Infanta ; and the Spanish Council decided to mention no other name, either in approval or otherwise, until matters were further developed. On one point every Coun- cillor was absolutely agreed, namely, that the most important thing was " utterly to exclude the Kings of Scotland and France." " As in a matter of this sort right is the least important element of the claim, although it is necessary in order to justify the employment of force, the Council is of opinion that the financial question should be first considered and decided ; whilst the forces in Flanders and the fleet should be made ready, so that on the very day that the Queen dies a movement may be made from both sides (i.e. Flanders and Ireland) simultaneously in favour of the object aimed at." Philip was, as we have seen, slothful and pleasure-loving, deciding 1 The Earl of Worcester (Henry Somerset) was an elderly man, who died in the following year (1601), leaving a small fortune and a large family. The person referred to in the text is probably his son, Lord Herbert, and curiously enough at the period when the Spanish Council were discussing his candidature for the English crown, he was marry- ing with great pomp and splendour Anne (or Elizabeth) Russell, a cousin of Sir Robert Cecil's. Accounts of this magnificent festivity will be found in Chamberlain's " Letters " and Nichols' " Progresses of Queen Elizabeth." See also Lady Russell's letter to Cecil, Hatfield Papers, vol. vii. p. 267. THE ENGLISH SUCCESSION 415 often by impulse, but neglecting to insist upon his decisions being carried out. Everything was left to Lerma, who was too lavish in Spain to be anxious to undertake much expenditure elsewhere. So, month after month passed without any active orders being obtained from them with regard to the English succession.^ Father Creswell, who, of course, was ignorant of the discussion I have just described, incessantly prayed for an answer that he might send to England, but for months he begged in vain. There was no promptitude to be expected from Philip III. any more than there had been from Philip II., in the one case because he worked too little, and in the other because he had worked too much. At length, early in December 1600, Father Cres- well appears to have been asked his opinion as to the form in which an answer to the English Catholics should be drafted ; and the memorandum which he consequently submitted to the King begins with a somewhat obscure suggestion. " The answer," he says, " should include some general reference to the pretensions of the Earl of Essex, so as to open the door to an arrangement by which he may be gained 1 During tliis period (the autumn of looo) an event happened which shows how keen the Jesuit ijarty was to lose no point in the game. The Duke of Parma, who had a far better cLaim to the English throne than Philip or the Infanta, was intriguing in Rome to obtain a cardi- nal's hat for Arthur Pole (nephew of Cardinal Pole) ; but the Jesuits took fright at this at once. Pole, they said, was only twenty-five, and practically a foreigner, and worst of all, " he will not be a fit instru- ment to aid in the object desired by all good English Catholics in your Majesty's interests, as the most intimate English friends he has have been those opposed to your Majesty." The English Jesuit party, through Thomas Fitzherbert, therefore, urged Philip to move the Pope to make Father Persons a cardinal instead of Pole (Brit. Mus. MSS. 28,420).,S 41 6 TREASON AND PLOT to the service of God and your Majesty." ^ As he did on a former occasion (page 224), Creswell urges the necessity of an appearance of great moderation and mildness, and his draft answer points out " that the fault being national rather than personal, it will be unjust to treat heretics in England as they are treated in Spain, or as they were treated in England by Queen Mary. Conversion may be best forwarded by caring well for working people, and by winning converts by suavity and mildness." The principal Catholics, he thought, should be informed privately that the King of Spain would support the Infanta's claim with a powerful force when the Queen died, but no time must be lost or they will rally to the King of Scots. Certainly, continues Creswell, " any new sovereign of England (except a Spanish nominee) will be worse for Spanish interests even than Elizabeth ; because by granting freedom of conscience he will conciliate a certain faction in '■ It is not easy to see how Essex's pretensions could have been re- conciled with Spanish aims ; but as it was known that he had been in treasonable communication with Tyrone, who had reported that he (Essex) was willing, in return for favours to himself, "to hand the country over to your Majesty" (Philip), Father Creswell doubtless believed this to have been the case, and that Essex could be bought by the concession to him of power and wealth. It is, however, fair to say that this statement only rests upon Tyrone's word as repeated by the Arclibishop of Dublin, Mateo de Oviedo. Considerable strength is given to the chance of its truth liy a note written in April 1601 by Father Bluet on a letter from Dr. Eagshaw to him, asking for further particulars of Persons' hand in Essex's matter (" Jesuits and Seculars," from Petyt MSS.). Bluet writes : " Mr. Parsons about three yeares since was tampering and hatching a plotte to set up Essex against her Majestic. Hereof he brake w^"^ a priest, and acquayting hym w*'^ ye helpes y'' he shuld haue out of Spayne and ye Lowe Contries, moved ye said priest to be his messenger of this matter unto ye earle. But ye priest refused to be a dealer in such cause, and yet gaue him good woi-ds lest otherwise he might haue procured hym to be sent to ye galleys." BOTHWELL IN SPAIN 417 Rome, and will prevent the Catholics from looking to your Majesty." Above all, he prays that an answer should be speedily sent to England, in which recommendation the Council concurred, though they rejected his hint that iirabella Stuart or the Earl of Derby's daughter (sister?) should be mentioned as alternatives to the Infanta. But again the whole business was relegated to the pigeon-holes of Philip and Lerma, and still no decided answer was sent to the English Catholics. Nor were the Irish and English appeals the only ones that at this time occupied the ponderous delibe- rations of Philip's advisers. Bothwell, after trying un- successfully to intrigue with Cecil, to whom he offered his services as a spy, had travelled from Flanders to Spain, and was for ever bombarding the King and Lerma with projects and memoranda for the "con- version" of Scotland. His first plan was for 3000 troops to land in the Orkneys, which belonged to his brother, the Earl of Caithness. The latter was to contribute 4000 clansmen, and, after fortifying the islands, the force was to seize Broughty and Perth, which, Bothwell said, could be made impregnable. The advantages he promised from this step were enormous. The Dutch could be crippled by the stoppage of all their commerce ; the Queen of England would be forced to stand on the defensive with all her resources ; the Irish could be supported with ease from the west coast, and the King of France would find himself checkmated by the only means that could frustrate his plans, ^ as he would be ^ War between France and Spain was threatening in consequence of the claim of France to the Marquisate of Saluzzo. 2 D 41 8 TREASON AND PLOT obliged to send troops to Scotland. The principal object, however, at first professed by Bothwell was that James should be rendered powerless to push his claim to the English crown when Elizabeth should die. If he is allowed to establish himself in England, " he will be a greater enemy to God and Spain than ever, since he will be very powerful by land and sea, aided by Denmark, Holland, and all the heretics." ^ Again and again Bothwell returned to the charge. The Irish enterprise could not be undertaken successfully, he assured Philip, unless in conjunction with an invasion of Scotland, which would furnish a base of supplies. Then his plans became larger : 4000 men should land in the Orkneys and 4000 in Kirkcudbright, the noblemen of the north and west, all of whose names he gives, will be ready to join the Spaniards when they land ; the Catholic Church in Scotland must pay the whole of the expense of the war, and a Spanish ambassador should be sent to Scotland at once to arrange the business secretly with the Catholic nobles. All this was, of course, visionary, and in the cir- cumstances impossible, seeing the financial and ad- ministrative condition of Spain ; but to add to its impracticability Bothwell somewhat later suggested conditions that might, he thought, be proposed for bringing in James himself. The King of Scots might be recognised by Spain as King of England if he would marry his son to the Duke of Savoy's daughter and his daughter to the Duke of Savoy himself, the Prince (Henry) being sent to live in Spain under Philip's control. "There is no other ' Spanisli Calendar, vol. iv., Simancas. JAMES STILL ACTIVE 419 alternative but to make peace and a firm alliance with the King of Scots before the Queen of England dies, or else to make a determined war which will utterly ruin and destroy him, which will be easy for his Majesty." Bothwell did not apparently care very much which course was adopted so long as his intriguing spirit might be employed in promot- ing it ; but Philip was powerless to undertake such a task as the invasion of Scotland, even with the questionable aid of the shifty Scottish nobles. It was seen that in every Scottish plan there still lurked the possibility of James Stuart being placed on the English throne by the Catholics as a consequence of his assumed conversion, and this, as we have seen from the first, was the one solution which Spain dreaded of all things. So Bothwell's grand schemes were all vaguely praised and relegated to the oblivion of Lerma's pigeon-holes, whilst he was kept in hand by great pensions on paper and small payments in cash.^ Whilst the Spaniards were thus trifling, James Stuart was busier than ever, Patrick Stuart and James Drummond were sent to the Pope in the summer of 1600 "to confirm the promise previously ^ One scheme of Botliwell's was accepted (August 1600), although I can find no record of its having been carried into effect. Lord Burleigh, a Scottish Baron, had been sent by James as his ambassador to Holland to obtain the recognition of the States to his English claims. Burleigh was instructed to purchase in Holland 20,000 muskets and as many cuirasses to send to Scotland; "but,"' said Bothwell, "he is so good a servant of mine that it will be easy to induce him to bring all these arms hither instead of to Scotland " (Simancas MSS., Spanish Calendar). 2 The Master of Gray sent to England the copy of the letter written by James to the Pope, in which the Cardinal's hat was requested for the Carthusian Chisholm, Bishop of Vaison, and a confirmation sent of the promise taken by the latter of concessions to the Catholics in 420 TREASON AND PLOT taken to Rome by the Scottish Carthusian Bishop of Vaison (for whom James asked for a cardinal's hat), and to pray for the money promised by the Pontiff for making war upon heretic England. Father Persons in Home was now almost fiercely remon- strating with the Duke of Sessa, as the Scottish King's successful hoodwinking of the Papacy and the Catholics everywhere became more and more apparent. Persons had persuaded the Pope to throw cold water on Constable's romantic efforts to convert James in the spring of 1600, but, as we have seen in the last chapter, Constable had then managed to enlist the French in his plans, and had gone to Scotland in conjunction with Bethune and other French representatives. They had man- aged also to bring into the plan the Pope's Nuncio in Paris, and had swept into their net most or all of the English refugees, who had despaired of a Spanish dispensation after the death of Philip II. and the cotland. This was accompanied by professions of reverence to the Pontiff. Elizabeth indignantly sent Bowes to demand an explanation from James, who solemnly declared that he had sent no such letter, which assertion the Secretary of State, Elphinstone (Lord Balmerino), confirmed. At a subsequent period Cardinal Bellarmin published the letter, and upon investigation Elphinstone confessed that the King's signature had been obtained by a trick and that the King was ignorant of the contents of the letter. Elphinstone accordingly was tried and condemned, but pardoned on the intercession of the Queen of Scots. Both Robertson and Dr. Gardiner appear to accept Elphinstone's con- fession in good faith, and the Scottish Jesuit, Creighton, who had been concerned at Rome in Drummond's mission, endeavoured to let his King down gently by declaring that in the letter James did not profess to be a Catholic. With the many letters now before us in which James does pretend his desire for reconciliation with Rome, the most probable explanation of Elphinstone's action in this i^articular case is that he sacrificed himself to save his sovereign's reputation, and on that, as on so many^ other occasions, James lied like the coward he was. JESUIT EFFORTS RENEWED 421 stoppage of their pensions. Emissaries of this strong combination actively sped between Paris, Rome, England, and Scotland, and their errands were soon divulged to Persons (December 1600).^ The association of the King of France with James in his plans made the matter all the more alarming for the Jesuit party, for Henry Avas their deadliest enemy, reigning as he did by means of conciliation and tolerance. Persons reported that already Henry had begun to make an arrangement with the English nobles, both Catholics and heretics, to obtain some measure of toleration for the former during the Queen's life and for James to succeed on the same lines when she died. The promoters of the scheme, he said, had their agents with the Earl of Essex and other members of the Queen's Council for the pur- pose of settling the details, and if something was not done at once the cause of the Infanta was ruined.^ This seems somewhat to have aroused Philip's Govern- ment, who in consequence sent orders to the Duke of Sessa to watch matters closely in Rome and to alienate the Pope from the King of Scotland. Again the Spanish Council of State prayed the King of Spain to make up his mind openly to champion the Infanta's claim. Here was England slipping from ^ It must not be forgotten that at this period also the Archpriest con- troversy was in full swing. The English Seculars, many of whom had been suspended by the Archpriest Blackwell for schism, had appealed to the University of Paris for judgment on the points involved. The Faculty of Theology decided in favour of the appellants, and Blackwell condemned the judgment as injurious to the Holy See. A fresh appeal from the Seculars was then sent to the Pontiff. Persons was, of course, in the thick of the dispute in Rome, the political bearing of the controversy being now as important as the religious. ^ Simancas MSS., Spanish Calendar, vol. iv, p. 683. 42 2 TREASON AND PLOT his grasp, they told him, for want of resolute action. Persons had assured the Duke of Sessa that he had means for gaining to his side certain members of the English Council, and this was acknowledged to be of the highest importance, but still no prompt action was taken. Persons had to confer with Sessa, and the latter had to communicate with Brussels and Valladolid, where infinite time was wasted in discussion and in the King's indecision. And so everything on the Spanish side dragged and dragged whilst all other interests were alert and working. But these intrigues, impotent on the one side and active on the other, give us a clue to the unsolved riddles of Essex's fate and the obscure tragedies that ushered in the reign of James. Exactly how far Essex and his friends were pledged to the Franco-Scottish intrigue just mentioned it is diffi- cult to say, though, as he was in close and confiden- tial communication with James, as the latter was with the French King and the Pope, it is fair to conclude that Essex was cognisant of the whole plan,^ and was either convinced of the falsity of James's professions of Catholicism or was content to sacrifice the Protestant cause for the sake of his personal ambition. It is quite as certain, on the other hand, that Persons, probably through Garnet or Blackwell, had some sort of understanding with a group of English nobles who professed to have gained, or to be able to gain, some of the members of the Council. These members, of course, could ^ It must not be forgotten also that after Essex's revolt Boissise, the French Ambassador, interceded with the Queen for him, "the greatest friend of France in all England." PEACE NEGOTIATIONS 423 only be those of the moderate party, most of whom were secret Catholics opposed to Essex and to the French or Scottish alliance/ The Lord Admiral, Cobham, Pembroke, Shrewsbury, and Cecil belonged to this party, and these, or some of them, must be the men indirectly alluded to by Persons. It is pro- bable that some whisper of these communications may have reached Essex, and have given him the pretext for the cry he raised on his hare-brained attempt at revolution, that Cecil and his party had sold England to the Infanta. During the disgrace of Essex after his return from Ireland, active negotiations for peace with Spain were proceeding. As invariably was the case when Scotland and France drew together, Spain and Eng- land did the same. Sir Thomas Edmunds was sent to greet the Archduke and the Infanta, and was received with unusual honours, and in February 1600 Vcrreyken, the Flemish envoy, came to Eng- land, where, says Chamberlain, the Queen received him " with all the ceremonies and compliments that could be devised." Whilst Essex was languishing a prisoner at York House it must have been gall and wormwood for him to hear of the grand feasts with which the emissary of a Spanish prince was enter- tained at the English court. " He (Verreyken) on Monday and Wednesday sat at the Lord Treasurer's in council with the Lord Treasurer, the Lord Admiral, the Lord Chamberlain (Hunsdon), Mr. Secretary ^ I consider it extremely unlikely that the Spanish Jesuits' plan of winning Essex to their side was ever seriously undertaken. From the note of Bluet, quoted on page 416, it is plain that though Bagshaw was anxious to obtain particulars for the purpose of damaging Persons and his party, the accusation rested on a flimsy foundation. 424 TREASON AND PLOT (Cecil), and Sir John Fortescue. The negotiation is kept very close. . . . Our discoursers shoot many bolts in this business, which to them seems so entangled and intricate that in seeking to undo one knot they make two. . . . Whatsoever the reason is, methinks we are not so hot on this peace as we were, and the least stop in such a cause may turn the tide." ^ There were many considerations which made peace difficult of arrangement, but in good truth the desire of Cecil was not so much peace — unless indeed on such terms as Spain was not yet humble enough to grant — as the appearance of a rapprochement between England and Spain as a countercheck to James's Catholic intrigues. In March Edmunds was again sent back to Flanders to discuss with the sovereigns the time and place for a conference, whilst " Sir Walter Ralegh attends the ambassador (Verreyken) much, and carries him up and down to see the sights and rarities hereabouts. He hath had him at Powles, at Westminster, at Whitehall, and where not. This day he is feasted at the Lord Treasurer's and to-morrow at the Lord Chamberlain's, where methinkes it shold be some- what strange to see carowses to the King of Spaine's health."' At length, after infinite bickering about the place of meeting, Boulogne was agreed upon, where the 1 Chamberlain's Letters. See also Rowland Whyte's Letters in the Sidney Papers, which give a glowing account of the festivities. Verreyken lodged at the house of Alderman Baning at Dowgate, •which being near the ancient Gildhouse of the Hanse, was the quarter of the Easterlings. 2 Ibid., March 5. The Lord Chamberlain Hunsdon, the Queen's first cousin, was a member of the Puritan party. NEGOTIATIONS WITH SPAIN 425 English Commissioners arrived in the middle of May, and the Flemings and Spaniards shortly after- wards.^ The difierences were quite irreconcilable from the first, for Elizabeth could not afford to abandon the Dutch unaided to the tender mercies of Spain, or to allow them to seek safety by appeal- ing to France ; whilst, on the other hand, Spain would not yet acknowledge herself completely beaten and surrender her dream of Catholic supremacy. In fact, however, the grave issues were never even ap- proached by the conference. The principal point in the instructions of the Spanish representative was that he must be "very circumspect to uphold the dignity and prestige of our King." The first step taken with this object was to arrive at Boulogne after the English envoys, in order that the latter might, as Zuniga says, have the good manners to pay the first visit. But the Englishmen were on their guard, and merely sent a servant to exchange copies of powers. Then endless haggling by correspond- ence took place as to the style to be given to the Archduke, Serene Highness being at last agreed to. When, however, the question of precedence in the mention of England and Spain came forward, a deadlock occurred. " They are so obstinate," wrote Zuniga, " in claiming precedence, notwithstanding J Sir John Herbert, Sir Robert Beale, Thomas Edmunds (afterwards kniglited), and Sir Henry Neville were the English representatives, Louis Verreyken and President Jehan Richardot the Flemish, and Baltasar de Zuniga and Fernando Carillo the Spanish. A full account of the negotiations will be found in Neville's and Winwood's Corre- spondence (Winwood Papers), and in British Museum, Cotton. Vesp. cviii., as well as in the uncalendared papers of the date at Hatfield, the French Correspondence in the Record Office, and the Spanish State Papers Calendar, vol. iv. 426 TREASON AND PLOT our serious arguments, that we closed the colloquy, and we shall not again enter upon the matter." The English then suggested that they shoald toss up or cast lots for precedence, w^hich greatly shocked the Spaniards, as being undignified. Much discussion and various suggested ingenious expedients followed to get over the difficulty, the most hopeful being that the meeting should be held in the lodgings of the Spanish envoys, who then, as hosts, would give their guests, the English, the place of honour. But this was refused by the English, and weeks more were wasted whilst instructions came from the respective Governments. The utter hollowness of the negotia- tion is seen by the view taken by the Spanish Council of State. They were furiously indignant with Zuiiiga and Carillo for discussing or consider- ing the English claim for precedence, or even for equality. " Such a claim," they said, " had never been advanced before, and it is not befitting so great a King as ours that it should be listened to for a moment." So the envoys were smartly reprehended, and carefully warned to admit nothing derogatory to the King's dignity, "which," said the Council, "was so fully established that no discussion as to equality must be allowed." The temper of Elizabeth and her Government was, with better reason, quite as firm as that of the Spaniards, and the deadlock continued, both sides in the meanwhile looking to events in Ireland and Savoy respectively to render their anta- gonists more yielding. But whilst it must have been evident almost from the first that nothing would come of the negotia- tions, Zufiiga made good use of his opportunities THE CATHOLICS IN ENGLAND 427 for plotting and planning with the English Catholics of the Jesuit party. He wrote to his King in Sep- tember 1600 : "The English Catholics and Jesuits in England are pressing gravely for the invasion of England to be undertaken, which they say they can facilitate by means of the Catholics there. This will be effected by opening negotiations in your Majesty's name with some leading personages ; and Zufiiga says that they (the English Catholics) desire above all things that some decision should be adopted with regard to the succession, as they are very distrust- ful as to whether your Majesty will take the matter up. He (Zuniga) is keeping them in hand as well as he can, but arguments are no longer of any avail. The Catholics tell him that the Irish enterprise will not be of much use in the English affair ; because, although the Irishmen are Catholics, they are not to be trusted, owing to their ancient enmity against England. Zuhiga himself is of opinion that no money can be better spent than that employed in supporting the Earl of Tyrone." ^ This letter from Zuniga was seized upon by the Spanish Council as an opportunity for once more urging their slothful King to action, and at the same time they made a noteworthy admission of the wane of Spanish power. " There is no need," they wrote, "to discuss the enterprise {i.e. invasion) pro- posed by the (English) Catholics, as experience has shown the impossibility of conquering the country from here, even under better circumstances than at present ; but, in order to keep hold of the English Catholics, it will be advisable for your Majesty to ^ Simancas MSS., Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. 42 8 TREASON AND PLOT adopt some resolution respecting the succession. If this be not done in good time, the Catholics may join the King of Scots or some other claimant." And so the negotiations for peace with England simply resolved themselves into a conspiracy against her ; but it answered the purpose of both Govern- ments to drag them out for their respective national objects. This hollow junketing with Spain, from which he, of course, was excluded, seems to have driven Essex finally to despair. Still forbidden from the Queen's presence, though in the autumn he had been released from custody, he must have heard through his zealous friends and spies plentiful whispers of plots to counteract the Catholic acti- vity of the King of Scots — plots which, if they were successful, would mean his own ruin. Father Per- sons' talk of his agreement with high English Catholic nobles, and Zuniga's close communications with the leaders of the same party, can hardly have been entirely hidden from Essex, and drove him onward to his catastrophe. By means of the papers quoted in these pages we are able, perhaps for the first time, to understand how futile all these in- trigues were rendered by the sluggish ineptitude of the Spanish King and his Government. There was, we can now perceive, no danger really to be appre- hended from plots which depended for their exe- cution upon the decisions of Philip III. and Lerma; but it must not be forgotten that contemporaries were not able, as we are, to see the hands of all the players at the great game, and Essex, doubtless, represented many of his countrymen, especially of ESSEX'S REBELLION 429 the Puritan party, in believing that the work of the Reformation was to be undone, and England sold to Spain and the Jesuits by Elizabeth's principal Ministers. The scope of this book does not admit of a re- petition of the details of Essex's foolish attempt at revolution, but it will be necessary to glance at the accusations brought by him, and against him, with regard to the intended betrayal of the Protestant cause. We have seen sufficient of his ambitious and vindictive temper to know that his first thought must have been to revenge himself upon those he hated, and to secure for himself at least the dictator- ship of England ; but it must have been obvious, even to him, blinded by his popularity as he was, that some better cause than his personal aims must be alleged before he could arouse a law-abiding people to rebellion. The not unfounded suspicions of Spanish intrigue, to which I have referred, gave him the cry he needed. Whether he believed them to the full himself matters little ; if he could make other people of his party believe them, his end would be served. After his liberation in August he tried desperately to regain the good graces of the Queen. Lord Henry Howard, his false friend, who betrayed him, as he betrayed every other creature that trusted him, carried to the Queen abject letters of submission and despair from her fallen favourite. The Queen dryly hoped that the writer's deeds might match his words, but she showed no signs of relenting. In October, we are told by Chamberlain, the friends of Essex were trying to obtain permission for him to join the 430 TREASON AND PLOT tilting on the Queen's birthday, "and they are very confident to see him shortly in favour. You may believe as much of it as you list, but I ne'er a whit, for till I see his license for sweet wines renewed (that expired at Michaelmas), or some other sub- stantial favour, I shall esteem words as wind and holy water at court." When Elizabeth came to understand that the first object of his tearful prayers was to obtain a renewal of his sweet-wine monopoly, her heart hardened more than ever. Penitence and remorse, that he might gaze upon her bewildering beauty again, was of course natural, and might in time have melted her, but to find that he was only hankering after money aroused her rage, and she refused his hint insultingly. " An ungovernable beast," she said, " must be stinted of his provender," and Essex, thus repulsed, sought for favour no more. Thenceforward his only chance was to overturn by force and destroy all the men who surrounded the Queen. We have seen that he had appealed in vain to his successor in Ireland, Montjoy, to bring over the Queen's army to coerce the Queen's Government, and that his cry for aid to the King of Scots had been answered by vague promises.^ ^ When Montjoy had first gone to Ireland in the early spring of 1600 (Essex's fate being then undecided), he had sent to James, offering to bring over the Queen's troops to England for the jiurpose of co-operat- ing with the Scottish King's forces and Essex, for the removing Elizabeth's advisers and securing the acknowledgment of James's right to the succession, with, incidentally, Essex's future paramountcy. James hesitated ; for he did not really wish to be King of a faction or to fight against his future subjects. When Essex, later in the year, urged Montjoy to act alone, the latter naturally refused to risk his head only to serve Essex's ambition (Confessions of Sir Charles Danvers and the Earl of Southampton). ESSEX'S REBELLION 431 At length, however, James consented to send a formal embassy to demand of Elizabeth the recog- nition of his rights, on the understanding that Essex should seize the Government by a coup de main at the same time and force the Queen to con- sent.^ During the winter of 1 600-1 601 Essex threw aside the attitude of love-lorn despair, which had proved inefl'ectual, and threw open the doors of Essex House to the members of the advanced Puritan party. Violent sermons were preached against Rome and all her works ; the Earl's old friends and adherents flocked to his anterooms, as did the rabble of idle captains and younger sons, who looked to him for advancement, and the lead- ing citizens, to whom the very name of Spain was anathema ; and it was impossible for Cecil to shut his eyes to the fact that Essex was gathering around him the elements of revolt. Whilst this was going on at Essex House, the leading conspirators, Essex, Southampton, Sir Ferdinando Gorges, Sir Charles Danvers, and others, matured their plans, as they thought secretly, at Drury House hard by. The Government, however, ^ The instructions suggested by Essex to be given by James to his ambassador, the Earl of Mar, are important as showing that the pre- text for the movement was to be mainly religious. Certain of her highest Ministers, the Queen was to be told, meant to take advantage of the succession being open to ruin the country. The "West Country was commanded by Ralegh, the Cinque Ports by Cobham. The navy was in the hands of the Lord Admiral, the Treasury was controlled by the Lord Treasurer (Buckhurst), whilst Cecil had placed his brother as governor of the north, and Sir George Carew commanded in Munster, the key of Ireland. All these men bear malice against the King of Scots, " and all theyre counsayles and endeavours tend to the advance- ment of the Infanta of Spayne to the succession to the crown." The reason for these assertions is given at length in Cuff's confession. 432 TREASON AND PLOT were quite cognisant of the objects of the con- spiracy, and it was important that the attempt should be nipped in the bud before the arrival of the Earl of Mar with James's demands. On the 7th February 1601, accordingly, Essex was sum- moned by Secretary Herbert to appear before the Council, but excused himself from attending on the plea of illness. Gathering his principal friends at Drury House on the same day, he told them that the affair was discovered, and asked them whether they would move thus prematurely or submit. Dismay sat upon every brow, and there was a general feeling that submission would be the wiser course. A message from Sheriff Smyth promising the aid of 1000 of the trained band of the city seems to have turned the scale, and the fatal decision was adopted of raising the cry of revolt early next morning. The original plan of seizing Whitehall by surprise was now, of course, impos- sible, as the Queen's Guard was on the alert ; but messengers were sent through the city in the even- ing, Saturday, to spread the news that Ralegh and Cobham intended to kill the Earl of Essex. And early on Sunday morning the 8th February Essex's friends Southampton, Monteagle, Sandys, Rutland, and 300 gentlemen met at Essex House with the intention of riding into the city, and arousing the citizens with the cry that England was sold to the Catholics, and that the people's idol, Essex, was to be done to death by the unpopular Ralegh and Cobham. Whilst they were assembling in the courtyard, a message came from Ralegh to his kinsman Gorges, ESSEX'S REBELLION 433 asking him to meet him. Essex consented to his doing so, if the interview took place in boats on the river. There Ralegh solemnly warned Gorges of his danger, but without avail, for " I told him that there were 2000 gentlemen who had resolved that day to die or live as free men." A committee of the Council was sent to Essex House to summon the assembly to disperse in the name of the Queen. They found the great courtyard opening from the Strand filled with armed men, amidst whom stood the Earl ; and as the gate closed behind the Lords of the Council, they found themselves prisoners, with a threatening crowd surrounding them. After a heated harangue of complaint and accusation, Essex led the Lords into the house, where they were kept as hostages, whilst the misguided conspirators, 300 gallants and swashbucklers, hot-gospellers and riffraff, trooped into the City through Temple Bar. " For the Queen ! for the Queen ! " they cried some- times ; but more often that Ralegh had tried to kill Essex and that England had been sold to the Infanta. The citizens, on their way to early morn- ing service, flocked around agape, but raised no hand and few cheers. The emissaries of the Council sped forward to warn the Lord Mayor of his duty, and the chief magistrate, being at service at St. Paul's, ordered Ludgate to be closed. But when Essex and his followers appeared before the closed gate, and, waving his sword, the Earl told his story to the custodians, he was granted admission, and rode triumphantly up Ludgate Hill and Cheapside. no man, so far, staying him. Near the Exchange was the house of Sheriff 2 E 434 TREASON AND PLOT Smyth, his mainstay in the City ; but before the Earl arrived there the Sheriff had taken fright and had rallied to the Lord Mayor, for on the steps of the Cross of Chepe, Cecil's brother, Lord Burghley, with the Lord Mayor by his side, had, in the Queen's name, proclaimed P.ssex and his followers traitors, and treason was no light matter under Elizabeth. Some of Essex's men had charged the Queen's ^osse, and Burghley's horse was killed by a petronel shot ; but Essex and his principal friends waited in vain in Smyth's house, lingering over their break- fast, until the Sheriff should return with his trained bands. As he came not, Essex grew uneasy, and walked up Cheapside into St. Paul's Churchyard, still doing nothing but complaining of his wrongs to his dwindling band. Whilst he was thus trifling the City was arming. Chains were run across the streets, gates were shut, and armed men were mus- tering, and when Essex, thoroughly alarmed, at three in the afternoon, thought of returning home, he found that only a hundred men stood by him, his way was barred, and the cry of treason followed him as he rode. Driven back from Ludgate Hill, he fled up Watling Street and Friday Street into Chepe again ; but all were against him there, and, galloping down Bow Lane to the river, he took boat at Queen- liilhe to his house in the Strand. He entered his water-gate a beaten man : the Lords of the Council had been released by his steward, and only a few followers were with him. His first care was to take from his neck a little black taffeta bag, with the reply of King James to his appeal for aid, and another paper, both of which TRIAL OF ESSEX 435 he burnt, and then he and a few gentlemen deter- mined to fight till they should fall. But the forces against them were too strong ; the house was beset by land and water, and presently the Lord Admiral carried the gardens and banqueting-house. At nine o'clock at night two great guns were dragged to the main doorway, and then, after some parley, Essex and his deluded friends surrendered, and the next morning the Traitor's Gate in the Tower received them, whilst their followers found in arms were sent to the common jail,^ On February 19 Essex and Southampton were arraigned at Westminster before a court of twenty- six peers, Cecil, who was only a knight as yet, listening to all that passed, hidden behind an arras. The accusations against the prisoner were confined to the narrowest limits possible to secure his convic- tion on the capital offence of treason. The Govern- ment by this time were aware of the complicity both of James and Montjoy, and unless they were prepared to disqualify the former from the succession, and risk a military revolt of the latter, they dared not emphasise this grave element in the case. Essex throughout his trial loudly and wordily protested his loyalty to the Queen. His intention was, he said, to remove the advisers who were bent upon ruining her country by bringing in the Infanta ; and as a proof of this he let slip a remark which gave occa- ^ Some few days afterwards Captain Thomas Lea conceived a plot for seizing the Privy Chamber of Whitehall by surprise and coercing the Queen to sign an order for the release of Essex and his friends. He foolishly divulged the plot to Sir H. Neville and Sir Robert Cross, who informed Cecil of it. Lea was at once arrested, and executed February 17, 1601. 436 TREASON AND PLOT sion for a startling and dramatic scene, in which practically the fates respectively of Essex and Cecil vvere sealed. He had been told, he said, that Secre- tary Cecil had observed to one of the councillors "that the Infanta's title was as arood as that of any other person." ^ In a moment Cecil sprang from behind the arras, and dropping on one knee, prayed the court to allow him to clear himself of *' so foul and false a report." The peers thought there was no need of it ; but Cecil persisted, and in vehement speech dared Essex to name his informant. After some evasion the name was given by Southampton — Sir William Knollys, the uncle of Essex, and a cousin of the Queen. Cecil pressed that the Queen might be prayed to send Knollys to the tribunal immediately, without stating why he was required, and swore, on his salvation, that if the Queen sent him not, he (Cecil) would never more be Minister of hers. In breathless suspense the proceedings were delayed for Knollys' appearance, and when he came all present knew that the word he was to speak must ruin either Essex or Cecil. His answer was ^ The counter-accusation against Essex, that lie was in league with Spain, was, on the other hand, industrioush'^ spread about by Cecil and his party on equally slight foundation. Chamberlain writes in surprise (February 24) that none of these accusations were included in the charge. " I must say that one thing stickes much in men's mindes, that whereas divers preachers were commanded the Sonday before to deliver to the people, amongst his other treasons, that he had corn- plotted with Tirone and was reconciled to the Pope . . . and that he liad practised by the meanes of seminary priests with the Pope and the King of Spaine to be King of England, there was no such matter once mentioned in his arraignment." We know now that the two last of these loose accusations were untrue. They probably rested mainly upon the statements, already mentioned, of the secular priests anxious to injure the Jesuits. CECIL'S DECLARATION 437 clear. " I never heard him (Cecil) speak words to that effect." On the contrary, he cited instances in which Cecil had referred to the King of Spain's claim as " impudent." Essex's sole good pretext for his rebellion was thus cut from under his feet. He apologised to Cecil, but all was of no avail now, for Knollys' evidence showed that his revolt was founded on a lie. Then Cecil, with passion unusual to him, made a pronouncement, which, if men could have read the hidden meaning of it, would have shown them the road he meant to take. " I have said," he exclaimed, " that the King of Spain is a competitor for the crown of England, and that the King of Scots is a competitor, and my Lord of Essex, I have said, is a competitor, for he would depose the Queen and call a parliament and so be King himself; but, as to my affection to advance a Spanish title to England, I am so far from it that my mind is asto- nished to think of it, and I pray God to consume me where I stand if I hate not the Spaniard as much as any man living." So whilst Essex and his friends went forth to their death, his rival cleared his position to the extent of completely disavowing the Infanta's candi- dature. Of the three claimants mentioned by him, one he thus vehemently repudiated, another stood before him a convicted and condemned traitor, and the third, .James Stuart, was inferentially invited to bid for his support. And yet very few men under- stood this at the time. CHAPTER XIII The change in the succession f|uestion in consequence of the death of Essex — The secret understanding between James and Cecil — James's new attitude towards the Catholics — Lord Montjoy in Ireland — Occupation of Derry — Disappointment of Tyrone and O'Donnell with Spain — La Cerda's mission to Ireland — Pre- parations for a new Spanish expedition to Ireland — Carew in Munster — Sailing of the expedition — O'Sullivan Beare — The Spaniards in Kinsale — The siege — The Spaniards isolated in Kinsale, Castlehaven, Dunboy, and Baltimore — Defeat of Tyrone — Capitulation of Kinsale — The O'Sullivans and Dunboy — O'Don- nell in Spain — Death of O'Donnell — Exodus of the O'Sullivans, pardon of Tyrone, and the pacification of Ireland. The disappearance of Essex from the scene com- pletely changed the position of the succession ques- tion. Essex had, in his secret correspondence with James, persistently represented Cecil as the King's enemy. It had always been the policy of the mode- rate party in England to promote a close friendship with Spain and Flanders, as a counterbalance to the traditional union of France with Scotland ; and the younger Cecil in this had followed the footsteps of his father. But that either of them had the slightest intention of subjecting England to Spanish interests, or of favouring Catholic supremacy, as Essex averred, is untrue. Yet whilst Essex, with his vindictive personal jealousy and political ambition, took the zealous Protestant party as the tool to serve his ends, Cecil was obliged to lean for support, as his father had done, upon the nobles and gentry whose 438 CFXIL'S PROBLEM 439 sympathies were more or less avowedly Catholic, tempered mainly by a desire to retain the vast landed estates they held from the plunder of the Church. This party had many reasons for disliking the idea of a Scottish King. They had always looked upon Scotland as an inferior and semi-subject couutry. and upon Scotsmen as uncivilised boors of predatory and murderous habits ; the levelling tenets of the Scottish Presbyterian clergy filled them, moreover, with alarm, and many of them would frankly have preferred a pure Catholic domination under a native sovereign to the acknowledgment of James as their King. Cecil could not afford to do without the support of these men ; and yet he saw that the attempt to bring in any other sovereign than James on the Queen's death could only succeed if aided by foreign forces, which would mean civil war and the almost certain subversion of Protestantism. The problem before him was an extremely difficult one. He was now by far the most powerful man in England, — " King in effect," James called him in his instructions to the Earl of Mar ; but still his power in a great measure depended upon the Queen's good opinion of him and the support of the moderate party. For him to have openly favoured the King of Scots would have deeply offended Elizabeth, who was determined to have no successor legally acknow- ledged in her lifetime, and would also have driven the nobles, upon whom he depended, into schemes from which he would be excluded. The only course by which England could be saved from civil war and the Protestant Church preserved from destruc- tion was for Cecil secretly to reassure James of his 440 TREASON AND PLOT fidelity and wean him from his Catholic dependence, whilst Cecil kept in close touch with his own party opposed to James, for the purpose of being able at the critical moment to subvert their plans/ This was the course that Cecil took, and in doing so he not only betrayed and ruined Catholics like his brother-in-law^ Cobham, but men of whom he was personally jealous, such as Ralegh and Grey, who were really stronger Protestants than he was himself. James's ambassadors, the Earl of Mar and Edward Bruce, lingered on their way south until after the head of Essex fell, and they did not reach London until March 1601. Their instructions were greatly modified from those originally suggested by Essex, but they were to still urge the Queen to acknow- ledge James's right, and more forcibly to threaten Cecil and his party with vengeance if they opposed him, whilst to Cecil especially they were to promise James's favour for his timely aid. The instructions were never carried out ; for the ambassadors, Bruce notably, were cleverer than their King. They saw in London how untrue had been Essex's libels upon the Cecil party of favouring the Spanish domination of England, and heard ho"sv Cecil had vehemently disavowed the King of Spain at Essex's trial, and they accordingly got into touch secretly with the ^ Cecil on one occasion was afraid that James might be offended at liis consorting with his enemies, but the King thns reassured him : " I hairtely praye you to assure youre self, that ye can have no dealing L|uhatsumever with jewe, gentile or heathen, that ever will breede the least suspition in me of any crakke in your integretie towards me ; but by the contraire the further ye are upon thaire secreats, the more abil will I be to sitt as a godd uj^on all the imaginations of theire heartcs" (Correspondence of James and Cecil, Camden Society). AGREEMENT OF JAMES AND CECIL 441 all-powerful Secretary. Lord Henry Howard, who had been the go-between of Essex and James, appears to have been the first promoter of the arrangement ; and at a meeting between Cecil and the Scotsmen at Cecil's House in the Stntnd, the terms were agreed upon, and a cypher for the correspondence arranged. Cecil's conditions were that he would assure the peaceful succession to James if the latter would trust him, and cease all endeavours to obtain the recognition of his rights during the Queen's life. The correspondence between tliem was to be kept inviolably secret, and the extraordinary precaution was taken of sending it all by way of Ireland to divert suspicion.^ Our main concern at present with this most in- teresting correspondence is to mark how completely it changed James's policy towards the Catholics. He was now all amiability to the Queen, he ceased pestering her about the succession, and he discoursed quite eloquently of the foolishness and wicked- ness of any suggestion that he could ever turn his arms against England, which, as we have seen, he had been so eager to do a little while previously.^ All irritating embassies and activities with the ^ This extraordinary correspondence, which was kept up until the Queen's death, is published entire by the Camden Society. Cecil, on one occasion at least, solemnly denied that any understanding existed between him and James, and to the last the secret was well kept. 2 Nicholson, the English agent in Scotland, in a letter to Cecil al Hatfield, tells the story at this period of how James rebuked the Laird of Kinnard, in whose house he was staying on his progress. The Laird drank to the speedy union of the two kingdoms, and said he had forty muskets ready ; whereupon the King told him it was very wrong to wish such a thing, "but in Godes tyme." Kinnard was not in the secret, and no doubt wondered at the King's change of tone. 442 TREASON AND PLOT Catholic powers were stopped, and James thence- forward, with growing confidence in Cecil's strength and wisdom, was content to await the death of the Queen rather than "by climbing of hedges and ditches for pulling of unripe fruit to hazard the breaking of my neck." Incidentally the falsity and baseness of the man are shown in a vivid light. We have seen some of his cringing approaches to Spain and his devout professions of Catholicism when he thought such a course suited his interests ; yet when Cecil asked his advice as to proceeding with the peace negotiations with Spain, the King strongly urged that no peace should be made, because the prospects of his succession might be prejudiced by the new friendship and by the possible presence in England of Spanish agents, " Jesuites, seminarie priests, and that rable, quhairwith England is already toe muche infected, who would then re- sort there in such suarmes as the katerpillers or fiyes did in ^gipte." The King took this oppor- tunity of giving to Cecil an account of what he dignified by the name of his religion. Warning him of the large number of priests who were allowed un- molested to remain in England, he says, " I protest in Goddi's presence, the daily increase that I hear of Popery in England, and the proude vanterie that the Papists daily make ... is the cause that moves me to break forth in this digression." Cecil knew better than James that the English Catholics must not be driven to desperation at that juncture, and replied that he, too, detested priests and their doctrines, " only I confess that I shrinke to see them dye by dozens when at the last gasp JAMES'S NEW ATTITUDE 443 they come so neere loyalty. ... But contrariwise for that generation of vypars, the Jesuits, who make no more than ordinary merchandise of the blood and crowns of princes, I am so far from any compassion, as I would rather look to receive command from you to abstain than to prosecute." It is noteworthy, too, in this secret letter, that Cecil repudiates all ideas of toleration for the Catholics, and only asks that " some charitable relief should be used in prison or beyond sea" to those priests who have proved by acts their loyalty to the Government and to the claims of James. Thus, so far as the King of Scots and Cecil are concerned, the plot is laid bare : both of them hated priests and repudiated toleration ; but for the furtherance of their aims, "loyal" Catholics were to be dealt with mildly, in order that they might expect toleration from a King who had so often avowed himself a Catholic, and whose utter baseness they did not yet know. The interests were thus gradually nan-owing. James dropped out of the international intrigue ; the Spanish Council acknowledged the impossibility of invading either England or Scotland direct ; and thenceforward Spaiu could only work through Ire- land, or through the English Catholics, who disliked the idea of a Scottish king of England. When Montjoy had landed in Ireland early in 1600, he had found the whole country except the Pale and the walled towns in the hands of the rebels. Though the fastidious young lord had seen comparatively little fighting, which was the fault of the Queen rather than his own, he was a theoretical soldier of a high order, and seized at once upon the tactical needs 444 TREASON AND PLOT of the situation. His army was small, not exceeding 14,000 English infantry, mostly of very inferior quality, and some 1 500 horse, and he could not hope to march a sufficiently poNverful force by land through trackless Ulster to beat Tyrone in his own fastness. Munster was in different case. There the sturdy veteran, Sir George Carew, had a free hand, by severity and conciliation alternately, to bring the province back again to its obedience. The smaller chiefs were not overjoyed at the re-erection by Tyrone of the feudal princes, M'Carty More and Desmond, and the hold of the former, at least, over his clan was sufficiently precarious for him to han- ker after the recognition of the Queen's Government, who were inclined to favour his kinsman, Donnell, the chief chosen by the clansmen themselves before Tyrone's interference. By working upon the greed and ambition of these rival chieftains, and others in like case all over Munster, Carew managed before the end of the year to drive M'Carty and most of the other Munster chiefs into a sulky and shifty obedi- ence,^ whilst the Sugan Earl of Desmond lurked in hiding with a few followers. But Montjoy could not deal thus with the north and west. The base of Tyrone's position was Lough Foyle, and that of O'Donnell, Ballyshannon, be- cause their supplies of munitions of war and other ' Carew write? to Cecil, January 15. 1601 (Irish State Papers, 208, uncalendared), advocating a decided policy of conciliation with the Munster chiefs, with a general pardon. " 1 do not know any one man of quality in Munster who was not Ijound by his oath upon the Sacra- ment to assist the rebellion, though some have more openly declared themselves than others." Full particulai-s of Carew's campaign in Munster will be found in " Pacata Hiljernia" and the Carew Calendars. MONTJOY IN IRELAND 445 necessaries from abroad could reach them there alone with safety ; and only by means of a force conveyed by water could the English hope successfully to attack them. Whilst, therefore, Montjoy made a feint of marching against Ulster by land, a force of 4000 foot, 200 horse, and 3 guns, under Sir Henr}^ Docwra, sailed to Lough Foyle and succeeded in fortifying themselves at Derry (May 1600). The second part of the programme, the occupation of Ballyshannon on Donegal Bay, commanding the string of lakes which stretch right into Connaught, was not then possible, as Montjoy was obliged to return into Leinster to suppress the fresh risings of O'Byrnes and O'Tooles there. The seizure of Lough Foyle, however, struck a shrewd blow at Tyrone, for he dared not now take too large a force elsewhere, for fear of seeing his own principality overrun by the men from Derry ; ^ and Montjoy was able before the end of the year to bring much of Ireland, outside Lester and Donegal, into at least nominal obedience. We have seen (page 407) that, notwithstanding the peremptory orders of Philip III. to the effect that a powerful force should be sent from Spain at once to aid the Irish rebels, all the summer and autumn of 1600 had been frittered away by his officers, and by the end of November 1600 not even the small preliminary supply of money and biscuit had been despatched from Lisbon. Apparently, how- ever, owing to the renewed prayers of Tyrone's envoy, 1 Fenton writes to Cecil on the ist January 1601 that "Tyrone is not a little gravelled to see Leinster in hazard to be gott from him " (Irish State Papers, 208, uncalendared). In the same letter Fenton says that Tyrone remains in the south part of his country "attending on Lough Foyle." 446 TREASON AND PLOT Richard Owen, a great effort was then made, and early in December "two tall ships" sailed from Lisbon with Don Martin de la Cerda on board, taking with him 10,000 ducats in money and a quantity of weapons and munitions of war. As usual, the most exaggerated and alarming news was spread in Ireland as to the strength of the expedi- tion, but thanks to Fenton's desire to " beat out the truth" and to the report of his trusty spy, we are in a position to know exactly what happened^ when La Cerda sailed into Donegal Bay. There promptly came to greet him not only O'Donnell,^ but Tyrone himself from Dungannon, OTiourke, MacWilliam Bourke, O'Connor Sligo, Hugh Mostyn, and other chiefs. They had, they told the King's officer, already despaired of help from Spain, and O'Donnell, much as he was needed in Ireland, was on the point of himself sailing to make a last appeal to the King.^ The Queen's troops had overrun Ireland during the summer and the Catholic cause was reduced to the last extremity, they told La Cerda, but if their sovereign, King Philip, would send them, without fail, at least 5000 infantry before July they could hold out in LTlster and the west till then. When, however, Philip's two short Latin letters 1 Fentoii to Cecil, January 20, 1601 (Irish State Papers, 208, uu- caleiiflared). - Tyrone quarrelled with O'Donnell because he went on board the Spanish ship and had speech with La Cerda before Tyrone arrived at Donegal. The money, arms, &c., were divided, one half going to Tyrone* and the other half between the rest of the chiefs (Irish State Papers, 208, uncalendared). •'' Sjianish Calendar, vol. iv. (Simaucas). SPAIN AND THE IRISH REBELS 447 were opened with much ceremony and read by Tyrone and O'Donnell, disappointment again fell upon them. There were only a few lines in each letter of vague sympathy and exhortation to stand iirm, with the same general promise of aid that had been made and broken so often before. " Where- upon O'Donnell was like a madd man, when he saw no kinde of news neither of men or money to come, and presentlie swore he would go himself to Spain, and would indeede have gone, if the captain of the Spaniards had suffered him. The Spaniard, seeing O'Donnell and the rest so angry, he told O'Donnell that he wronged himself, for, said he, you thinke that if the King send here an armie that he will let you or any one else know it ? No ! nor the Council of Spaine shall not know it. For so, may- hap, intelligence shall goe into England and so draw an armie against us, and this is the cause that none shall know what he meaneth to do." ^ With this comforting suggestion of La Cerda, the chiefs were only half satisfied, for of excuses they had had more than enough. So they settled to send back the Spanish Archbishop of Dublin and Tyrone's confessor, Father Chamberlain, to add their verbal prayers to the letters to the King which were carried by La Cerda. " But by God," swore Tyrone to Teuton's spy, " I have no longer any hope of help from the King of Spain, although, peradventure, he will send us a shippe with as much as he did now to feede us, for the King of France is at war with the Duke of Savoy, whom the King of Spaine will help, and so will have no men to spare this year." ' ' Irish State Papers, 208, uncalendared. ^ Ihid. 448 TREASON AND PLOT Tyrone was truly in evil case just then. His cattle were now but few, and of corn, bread, or butter he had none. The strong English garrison at Lough Foyle was a sharp thorn thrust deeply into his side, and the policy of keeping an English ship or two on the Irish coast was stopping his supplies by sea. His communications with Munster were almost cut off'.^ John of Desmond, the fugitive Earl's brother, had come to Donegal to pray for aid from the chiefs, who agreed to send O'Rourke's brother with looo men to the Earl's rescue,^ whilst Montjoy now had Leinster well in hand, and the Pale was safe from incursions. James Stuart, moreover, no longer smiled upon the rebel chief, and it must have been evident to Tyrone that his only hope of ulti- mate success now lay in the questionable arrival of powerful aid from Spain. The bulls he had received from the Pope, from which such great results were expected, had fallen fiat, for the real root of the movement, in the case of the chiefs, was territorial rather than religious, and they held (when it suited them) that Rome had no power to dissolve their allegiance to their sovereign, the Queen of England, who made no serious attempt, moreover, to interfere w4th their religious observances.'^ 1 The Spanish Archbishop, writing to the Sugan Earl of Desmond, who was in hiding, bidding him farewell (January 13), says he should have gone personally to him, but he could not go without an army (" Pacata Hibernia"). ^ This desperate attempt of Tyrone to force a way down to Munster was frustrated by ('arew, who reinforced Limerick and held the line of the Shannon (" Pacata Hibernia"). •'' It is related in "Pacata Hibernia" that certain Munster Catholics sent to Rome at this time priests to purchase from the Pope absolutioTi for abstaining from helping the Catholic cause. CRISIS OF THE IRISH CAUSE 449 The Irish cause, therefore, was now at its turning- point. If aid came from Spain promptly and strong, Ulster, at all events, might retain its autonomy under O'Neil and the old Irish tradition ; if it came not, then Tyrone must make the best terms he could with the Queen's Government. La Cerda, with the Spanish Archbishop and the Irish chieftains' letters, arrived in Spain towards the end of January 1601 at a favourable juncture, for the war between France and Savoy had just come to an end, and the Spanish infantry that had been raised to help Savoy was not now needed. The Archbishop pleaded eloquently for the Irish. "The country," he said, " and especially Tyrone and O'Donuell and the rest of the Catholics, now stood in imminent peril, and there was a danger of the entire extinction of the faith and obedience to the Church which they had hitherto upheld with so much bravery and blood- shed." He submitted the " grave prejudice which would thereby be suffered by Christendom at large, and expressed deep sorrow that, after they had ex- posed themselves to so much jeopardy in the service of God, and so many promises had been sent to them, they should be thus abandoned by a powerful and Catholic monarch, upon whom, after God, they had founded all their hopes." ^ These appeals touched Philipinhismost tender points, namely,his Catholicity and his pride ; and once more the whole subject was turned over to his Council of State for consideration and report. Again they told him that it was his obvious duty to support the Irish Catholics ; and they thought that in the circumstances 6000 men ' Simancas MSS., Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. 2 F 450 trf:ason and plot might be sent instead of the 5000 asked for by Tyrone. " Stores and munitions should be made ready at once, for they have not even bread to eat in Ireland. Everything should be done with great secrecy ; the men should be quietly concentrated in Lisbon, and an increased quantity of biscuit ordered." Sufficient money should be sent with the expedi- tion to last six months — 200,000 ducats, which sum it was supposed already existed in Lisbon — and 105,000 ducats more must be raised for fitting out the fleet. ^ In accordance with the recommendation previously made, Irish and other ships in Spanish soutliern ports were seized for the service,'^ and all the preparations were detailed for the sending to Ireland, at last, of a powerful force to strike a blow for the Catholic cause." In the meanwhile, alarming news of the threat- ening Armada came to Ireland and to England. ^ February 9, 1601. The Council to Philip. Simancas, Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. " Irish State Papers, 208, uncalendared. ' Ibarra provided the following estimate of the cost of the expedi- tion : — Ducats. 40,000 20,000 I 2,000 1 7,000 16,000 Maintenance of 4500 men for two months One wage for 4000 new soldiers to be shipped Two wages for veteran cavalry >^hipping and keep of men .... 'I'wo wages for Irish infantiy Jt is most imjjortant that the troops should be kept in good order and prevented from molesting the natives, so they must be paid punctually. For this and other needs there must be taken with the expedition ....... 200,000 Total, 305,000 The remaining 1 500 or 2000 men were to be provided for in Lisbon, presumaV)ly by the Portuguese Exchequer. Twenty caravels were to STILL ANOTHER ARMADA 451 Timothy Williams, a Plymouth mariner who had been a prisoner in Spain, escaped from Corunna and told of the vast collection of stores ; a merchant arriving in Ireland from Spain said that 9000 men were in Lisbon destined for Ireland.^ Montjoy clamoured for more men and stores, especially for Munster ; Carew caught the shifty M'Carty More corresponding with the rebels and haled him to prison (July 1601); the Suga7i Earl of Desmond was tracked to his last cave by the White Knight, and fell into English hands (May 1601) ;' there was no great Munster chief now to lead the province, and all men knew that the final trial of strength was coming which should make Tyrone a semi- independent vassal of Spain, or a beaten traitor at the mercy of Elizabeth. Through the summer the alarming news of a great Spanish fleet in prepara- tion came. Sometimes Cecil believed that the desti- nation was Flanders, and once there came in July a false alarm that the Spaniards were already in the Channel, where there were no English ships ready to resist them but a few foul little vessels under Sir Richard Leveson ; but the flocking of priests to Ireland, the rising hopes of the rebels, and the irre- pressible talk on the quays of Lisbon, convinced the Anglo-Irish governors, at all events, that the Spaniards were to strike at them. But at what point ? Carew persisted in his belief that Munster would be at- be freighted (those seized in the ports doubtless) at a cost of 140,000 ducats, to bring troops from the Azores. The accounts are extremely detailed, and the above is a mere abstract of them. ^ Harris to Cecil, March 9, and Lord Chancellor of Ireland to Cecil, February 9. Irish State Papers, 208, uncalendared. 2 A most quaint and curious account of James Fitz-Thomas's capture is in vol. i. of " Pacata Hibernia." 452 TREASON AND PLOT tacked, either Cork or VVaterford, and the aged Lord Admiral was of the same opinion. Carew, therefore, with his quite insulhcient forces, made what dispositions he could to hold Cork against an enemy, whilst he still kept back an advance of the rebels southward by grimly clinging to Limerick and the line of the Shannon. Montjoy was determined, if possible, to strike a blow at Ulster itself before the arrival of the Spaniards, and though he got but little help from England, he did nobly. In July he captured the fort on the Blackwater, which formed the door to Ulster from the Pale ; for Tyrone dared not divert his force from Lough Foyle, or Docwra at Deny would push down to Ballyshannon and so divide Tyrone from O'Donnell. Though Docwra was unable to reach so far south as that, he did the next best thing possible to him, namely, to make a dash at O'Donnell's capital of Donegal, which he captured and held in August. Thus month after month passed and still no Spanish Armada appeared. By the middle of Sep- tember a fine flying squadron of seven new galleons had been fitted out in England to supplement Leve- son's little Channel fleet, and the fear of a Spanish descent upon England, M^hich still haunted the minds of the men who had fought the Armada of 1588, grew less alarming as England stood on her guard. In the meanwhile affairs were proceeding in Spain in the usual inept fashion. When Philip had again accepted the advice of his council to send the fleet to Ireland (February 1601), he had "entrusted this matter to my confessor, as it is so much for God's service, in order that he may see everything recom- THE FINAL ARMADA 453 mended here carried out with all possible speed." And yet, although the soldiers were mostly mustered in Lisbon in February, it was late in August 1601 before the Council could advise Philip that all was ready for a start. Two flyboats had been sent to Killibegs during the summer ^ cariying messages to tlie chiefs as to the aid they might expect, and to take counsel as to its destination ; but almost to the hour of sailing of the fleet a difference of opinion existed as to the most suitable place for it to attack. Some of the Irish thought it should go to Ulster, some to Drogheda, but it was finally considered that the nearness of Munster to Spain gave it an advantage over other parts of Ireland, and Cork was selected as the port of debarkation. Early in September all was finally ready. There were thirty-three ships, great and small, for the con- veyance of troops, besides storeships, flyboats, and victuallers. Don Juan del Aguila, a famous Spanish soldier, who had held Brittany for so long against France and England combined, was in chief com- mand of the troops, of which there were nearly 5000, besides six pieces of siege artillery and a large quantity of stores. The shipping was under the command of Don Diego Brochero as admiral, and a fine old sailor, Pedro de Zubiaur, as vice- admiral. Carew stood ready at Cork, determined to fight as became his name, though the Government in London had helped him but little. On Sep- tember 13 a swift pinnace, under Captain Love of ' One of these vessels was very nearly caught by Captain Plessing- ton of the Tramontana, but she escaped by her superior sailing powers (Irish State Papers, 209, uncalendared). 454 TREASON AND PLOT Crookhaven, brought him the news that the Spanish fleet, with wind astern, was out of the Bay and sail- ing straight for Ireland ; and that day, and the next, and the next, the stout President of Munster looked hourly for the invaders who came not. On the fourth day the wind changed to the north, and he knew that, whilst that wind blew, Cork was safe from any Spanish fleet that sailed. Montjoy in the meanwhile had pushed south as far as Athy, and thither Carew rode to concert with his chief the plan of defence ; but fatigue and sickness overtook him before he reached Athy, and Montjoy found him lying ill near Kilkenny. Whilst they were there conferring, the wind changed to the east, and on the 23rd a breath- less messenger came from Sir Charles Wilmot at Cork to say that the Spanish fleet had two days before endeavoured to make the harbour, and had failed, whereupon the invaders had sailed towards Kinsale. Munster was the place of danger ; and Montjoy and Carew determined to concentrate every available man to face the foe there, leaving Dublin and the Pale to look after itself till the more press- ing peril had passed. The danger was again not so great as it looked, Spanish organisation was still wretched, and Spanish hearts were no longer in the task. When the northern gale had struck the fleet ofl" Ushant, the vice-flagship of Zubiaur, with eight other vessels carrying 650 soldiers and most of the stores, had been driven back crippled to Corunna, and another of the largest ships, full of men, had straggled, and had been captured at the mouth of the Channel by an English privateer. Three more vessels, with 700 INVASION OF IRELAND 455 men on board, fell ofi' too far to leeward, to make either Cork or Kinsale, and sought shelter in O'Dris- coll's harbour of Baltimore. The main expedition, therefore, that sailed into the harbour of Kinsale (October i, 1601, N.S.) brought only about 3000 effective soldiers under Don Juan del Aguila. The town was garrisoned by one English company ; the defences were obsolete and the place untenable ; so the Spaniards were allowed to land without opposi- tion. Don Juan was a chivalrous soldier of the old school, brave as a lion, but thinking little of sailors ; whilst Brochero, the admiral, like most of the men of his profession, believed that, though their function was conveyance and not fighting, seamen were, in their way, as dignified as men-at-arms. The demo- ralisation that afflicted the Spanish service also touched him ; and when Aguila requested him not to sail away until he had sent the food stores up the river to the town, Brochero replied that he could not wait to land the food, and simply cast the muni- tions anyhow, without order or account, into the ooze at the mouth of the harbour, " where they were all ill-handled and wet as if the enemy had been already playing with their artillery on the ships ; " and so Brochero sailed away, leaving Don Juan del Aguila with his little army, and only two field-pieces and two demi-cannon, to do the best he could.^ He endeavoured to tranquillise the townspeople, ^ Don Juan reported that the rest of the cannon was not landed, as he had not ammunition for it, much of the latter being spoilt by the wet. Philippus O'SuUevan (" Historiaa Catholica Iberniae ") says that, from the fir.^t landing of the force, dissensions existed between the Spanish officers, and between Aquila and the Spanish Archbishop of Dublin, who accompanied him. 456 TREASON AND PLOT assuring them personally and by proclamation that he would use them as friends and brothers; "yet, withal, he findeth no assistance from them, neither dare they declare themselves." The place, with its crumbling mediaeval walls, was commanded by hills on all sides, but a small peninsula jutting out in front of the town would make a good point from which the entrance from the sea could be de- fended. This, however, Don Juan decided that he had not sufficient men to effect, and to defend the town from the land-side as well. Many of his soldiers were boys and recruits, who began to skulk and evade as soon as they landed. This, however, he presently stopped, and his skill and firmness in- fused some spirit and courage into them. Still it was evident to him that in this exposed little town, with a small isolated force, short of food and stores,^ he could do nothing effectual until he had formed a junction with Tyrone. Montjoy he knew was with over 4000 English troops at Cork, only sixteen miles away, and there was nothing to prevent the Viceroy from pushing between Kinsale and the forces of the northern rebels. Aguila, therefore, could only send off beseeching messages to Spain for reinforcements and supplies, whilst the English troops gradually drcAv around him. Swift runners and pinnaces, too, were sent by Don .luan and the Spanish Archbishop to ' One of the lirst acts of the English was to burn all the food within five miles of Kinsale and seize the cattle (" Pacata Hibernia"). As we liave seen, the Spaniards had always been told that they need bring no horses, but only harness. The former, however plentiful they might be in Ulster, were non-existent in Kinsale, and the harness had drifted back to Spain. Aguila had therefore no cavalry with which to prevent the English destruction. THE SPANIARDS IN MUNSTER 457 warn Tyrone and O'Donnell of his coming. But they were afar off ; the English troops held Derry and Donegal, whilst Limerick and the Shannon in English hands lay between the rebels and the Spaniards, and before the chiefs could join Del Aguila, the force of the Lord Deputy would have to be utterly defeated. The Munster chiefs saw, like the rest of the world, that this was the struggle which was to de- cide once for all whether the Catholic supremacy should be restored or not. The fates had decreed that at the critical point all the chances leant to the side of England and Protestantism : but Catholic churchmen had not been exhorting and preaching to Irishmen in vain for so many years, and the Munster men began to simmer into fervour for the cause, as they thought, of God and Ireland. The great men, M'Carty More and Desmond, were safe under lock and key, offering to fight against their own country- men and swearing unalterable loyalty to the Queen in return for a recognition of their rank and posses- sions, but the smaller chiefs, all of whom had taken the oath of obedience, were impelled for many be- sides religious reasons to think of the future. Many of them held their lands, as English nominees, against the hereditary claimants under the Irish law, and if they sided with the English now, a rebel victory would mean their ejection and ruin. Such a man as this was Donal O'Sullivan Beare, Lord of Beare and Bantry, whose importance had been of late years enormously increased by the suppression of his prince, M'Carty More, and by the patronage of the English, who had dispossessed his uncle Owen 45 « TREASON AND PLOT in his favour. He, like most of his neighbours, had always been effusively loyal, though some of his kinsmen had risen up and joined the Fitzgeralds in the Desmond wars. This chief, with his magnificent harbour of Bantry and his apparently impregnable castle of Dunboy, did not wish to offend the English, but he was even more loath to lose his rank and possessions at the hands of Tyrone. So from Dun- boy a secret message went to Del Aguila to say that a thousand sturdy clansmen, fully armed, were ready, and a thousand more if arms were sent to them, to march under their chief to check the advance of Montjoy until Tyrone and O'Donnell could join the Spaniards. The Spanish commander could only reply sadly that his arms had drifted back to vSpain in Zubiaur's ships, and he had none to spare. He was, moreover, ignorant as yet of Tyrone's plan of campaign ; and whilst thanking O'Sullivan, he ad- vised him for the moment to stand firm but not to declare himself.^ In the meanwhile Carew and Montjoy worked like the heroes they were. The artillery and stores had to be brought from Dublin, and this delayed them for weeks before a regular siege of Kinsale could be undertaken ; but skirmishes and desperately resisted sallies of the Spaniards took place almost nightly, for the English force of about 4000 men were now close around the town. One of the victualling ships, under Captain Button, and a pinnace called the Moon belonging to the Queen, were the only vessels as yet available for blockade ; and once they made an ineffectual attempt with ' Philippiis O'Sullevaii. THE SIEGE OF KINSALE 459 their little guns, as they lay in the harbour uiouth, to capture the Castle of Rincorran, which commanded the entrance to Kinsale on the east side of the channel. At length, however, towards the end of October, the siege artillery and stores were landed in a little haven to the east of Kinsale toAvards Cork, and the siege of the town began in earnest. The first task of the English was to reduce the Castle of Eincorran, where Aguila had posted 150 men with a promise that they should be reinforced if the place were attacked. The Englisli had only two faulty culverins for their battery, and numberless mishaps befell them before they could be eifectually used. Again and again they broke down, and during the first night of the attack Aguila endeavoured to re- inforce the castle by means of boats from the town. In this, however. Captain Button, the sturdy victualler, who was on the alert, frustrated them by means of his popguns of dcmi-sakers. On the second day of the cannonade Carew lost patience at the poor practice, and laid and worked the guns himself. Aguila seeing that the fort must fall if not relieved, made a bold attempt to thrust reinforcements into it by land. A desperate little battle ensued, in which many fell on both sides before the Spaniards were driven back.^ The gallant little 1 It shoiild be explained that the harbour of Kinsale lies inside the serpentine mouth of the Bandon, which opens into the ocean towards the south. A little way inside the river suddenly turns west, forming a peninsula in front of the town, which lie.*: on a slope facing the east- The Castle of Rincorran was on the east side of the outer channel, facing the peninsula towards the west, so that to relieve it by land from the town a detour had to be made on the north side, and it was here that the battle in question was fought on October 31st, in which the Spaniards were driven back. 460 TREASON AND PLOT garrison of Riucorran did their best to make terras, but Montjoy insisted upon complete surrender and this the Spanish captain, Paez de Clavijo, refused unless he might retain his sword and return to Kin- sale. His own men threatened to throw him over the walls for his obstinacy, and many of them escaped by the waterside ; but by the ist November all was over at Rincorran ; Paez surrendered his sword to Montjoy, and Aguila now found friendly access to him cut off by land and sea. In the meanwhile, both England and Spain had awakened to the im- portant crisis that had been reached. The troops to be sent from England were increased from 2000 to 5000, but unfortunately mariners were hard to get, for all sea service except privateering for plunder was unpopular. Thus the soldiers stood waiting, and it was quite the end of October before the flying squadron of six royal galleons with merchantmen and transports sailed out of the Thames, crowded with troops, under Sir Richard Leveson. Then bad weather, head winds, and accidents delayed them in the Channel, and it was the 15th November before the naval force reached the offinar of Kinsale with the reinforcements which placed Montjoy in a position of at least numerical equality with the enemy. Tardy as had been the English naval preparations, those of the Spaniards were fortunately more lagging still. Zubiaur's squadron had to be refitted and re- inforced, and, notwithstanding Aguila's urgent and repeated messages, did not sail from Corunna until the 7th IJecember (N.S.). Tlie force was a strong one, consisting of ten ships with 829 foot-soldiers and a large quantity of food and stores. Again mis- THE SPANIARDS AT KINSALE 461 fortune or want of skill clogged the Spaniards from the first. One of Ziibiaur's ships was wrecked going out of port, and he lost sight of three others in the bad weather that followed, one of which was wrecked on the coast of Brittany, one returned to Galicia, and the third was captured off Kinsale by the English. With the six ships remaining Zubiaur approached Kinsale, but learning from Irish fishermen that the mouth of the harbour was full of English men-of-war, he sailed off to the convenient port of Castlehaven to the west. Sir Finnan O'Driscoll and his sons had always been loyal to the Queen, like their neighbour, O'Sullivan, but this fresh force of Spaniards arriving in their country turned the scale. Tyrone and O'Donnell were hastening south with the rebel army, Carew's attempt to intercept the latter at Cashel with a flying- column having failed, either by reason of O'Don- nell's better knowledge of the ground having enabled him to slip past the English into West Munster, or from Carew's disinclination to engage the Irish in an action, of which., from the first, he disapproved. There had also drifted into the O'Driscoll port of Baltimore three of the vessels of the original Brochero squadron, which had remained there isolated but un- molested. Now that Zubiaur's fresh reinforcement had arrived in their country, it seemed wise for the O'Driscolls and the O'Sullivans to throw over] their loyalty and to rally openly to the Catholic side. The fortresses of Castlehaven and Baltimore were solemnly handed over by their owners to the Spanish officers for King Philip. The news ran like wildfire through Munster, and from bog and mountain shaggy clans- men flocked down to their chiefs to fight for faitli 462 TREASON AND PLOT and Ireland against the Sassenach. O'Sullivan Beare, to be denied no longer, tendered the submission of his lands and castles to the King of Spain. ^ Zubi- aur armed 700 Irishmen, whom he despatched with 200 Spaniards to join O'Donnell, and then putting Spanish garrisons into C'astlehaven, Baltimore, and Dunboy, he sent pinnaces flying to Spain to beg for powerful reinforcements. Here were three little isolated Spanish forces, whose very existence depended upon the victory of the rebel chiefs over the English. AVith an in- credible want of skill or good fortune, each separate Spanish expedition had got itself bottled up in a different port, and practically beleaguered by land and sea. In the meanwhile, the siege of Kinsale, whither Carew had now returned from his abortive attempt to intercept O'Donnell, proceeded briskly ; the fleet under Leveson co-operating effectually with Montjoy. Two of the naval guns were landed, and forced tlie surrender of the entrenched fort on the peninsula facing the town that defended the inner harbour, and this enabled some of the ships to warp ^ O'ISullivau wrote a iainous letter to Philip III. on December 20, on the occasion of his voluntary submission to the Spaniards. After setting forth his own noble lineage and the racial connection between Ireland and Spain, he continues : " For these considerations and for manj' other commendable causes, I beijueath and oiler in humbleness of mind and heart, my own person, with all my forces, perpetually to serve youi- Majesty, not only in Ireland, but in any other place where it may please you. I commit, also, my wife and my childi'en, my manors, towns^ country, and lands, and my haven of Dunboy, next under God to the ]>rotection, keeping, and defence or commerce of your Majesty, to be in your hands and at your disposal," This letter was intercepted, and although O'Sullivan was afterwards anxious to be reconciled to the i*]nglish, he w as never forgiven. As will be told, he became a great S]ianish noble, and lived and died in Spain, as did most of his kinsmeu. FIGHT AT CASTLHHAVEN 463 inside, facing the houses of the town, and to add their battery to that of Montjoy from the land-side. At length, by the end of November, the lower town had become quite untenable, and the Spaniards were driven to the trenches on the farther side, and higher up the slope. Aguila looked, and looked in vain, for the coming of Zubiaur, or for the descent of the rebel chiefs, A great number of his men were sick, and all were famished ; but they fought well, sally- ing night after night and charging the English batteries, sometimes almost successfully. In the midst of this came the news of Zubiaur's arrival at Castlehaven (December 11, N.S.), and thither Leveson hastened with four galleons and two mer- chantmen of his squadron to engage the Spanish ships. The action that ensued is told variably by the two sides. Zubiaur himself reported that the English landed artillery to attack him ; but that he drew off and sank the Queen's flagship, greatly damaging the others, though two of his own ships sank. Philippus O'Sullevan goes beyond this, and says that 501 Englishmen were killed, 60 being knocked over by one shot, as they sat at table : whilst Leveson in his account to the Lord Deputy, claims to have driven the Spanish flagship on to the rocks, that another ship sank, and that two more Spaniards ran aground. Leaving Zubiaur with one, or at most two ships, Leveson then returned to Kinsale and told his story, whilst Zubiaur waited and prayed for succour in vain. But still the rebel chiefs came not. Don Juan del Aguila wrote to them on December 28, al- most indignantly. He expected them long before, 464 TREASON AND PLOT he said : the English were weak and weary, and a blow struck now would be effectual. He spoke truly. The march southward of Tyrone had drawn all Munster into revolt behind him. Montjoy's army was worn and reduced by the winter siege ; the small English squadron of galleons at Kinsale was quite inadequate to blockade the whole coast of Munster ; and another Spanish expedition under Don Martin de la Cerda was known to be ready to sail from Lisbon. With a little good luck and ability on the part of the Spaniards, Tyrone might at this juncture have turned the tide of events and have made England Catholic. But it was not to be. The weather was bad ; O'Donnell lagged on the way for Tyrone's coming; and it was January i, 1602 (N.S.), before the advance guard of the rebel army appeared to the north on the hills overlooking Kin- sale and the English position. Tyrone's plan was to thrust the Castlehaven Spaniards and Irishmen, who had joined him, round the extreme right (or western) flank of the besieging line, where the Irish levies were placed, into Kinsale, which he thought might make Agnila strong enough to come out and join hands with him. Intercepted letters and willing Irish spies informed Montjoy of the plan,^ and when, before dawn on January 2, 1602, the Spaniards and Munster Kerns crept round and made their attack, ^ In " Pacata Hibeinia," a somewhat significant account is given of one of the sources of Montjoy's information. Two days before the battle, Brian MacHugh Ogue MacMahon, Lord of Monaghan, sent a messenger to ask Montjoy for old acquaintance sake to send him a bottle of aqua- vita, which the Viceroy did. Either out of gratitude, or from a desire to hedge, or else because he dreaded the overlordship of O'Neil more than tlaat of the Queen, ]\IacMahon sent Montjoy a hint next day, upon which the latter was prompt to act. ROUT OF TYRONE 465 they found themselves outnumbered by the English whom Montjoy had stationed there since the previous evening. Out of the 200 Spaniards 140 were killed in the surprise ; and as they fled headlong, Tyrone, still in the dark, ordered his forces to draw off, his intention being to attack again with his main body by daylight. As soon as Montjoy learnt this, he ad- vanced rapidly and fell unexpectedly upon Tyrone's right flank as he retreated. The Irish were already demoralised by the confused retreat in the dark, and were seized with panic. The whole six thousand of them fled for life, being slaughtered without mercy when they were caught. Fifteen hundred died thus, and the next day every prisoner, not already sacri- ficed, was hanged. Tyrone was wounded, and was carried in a litter up into Ulster, and O'Donnell, with Redmond Burke, Hugh Mostyn, and the few remaining Spaniards, managed to reach Castlehaven. Heart-broken, panic-stricken, and desperate, he could only pray Zubiaur to carry them to Spain at once, with the dire news that all was lost ; that the heretic cause was victorious, and that Spain must put forth the whole of her might now, or abandon her dream for ever. The news fell upon Spain like a thunder-clap, and for once aroused the King and his Council to some activity. "Your Majesty's prestige is at stake," said the latter, " and yet there is no means of sending effective and prompt aid, for want of ships, arms, and men, everything being scarce and short." But still, they said, something must be done to keep up the war in Ireland, or the English would descend upon Spain and destroy them all. Every 2 G 466 TREASON AND PLOT man must be taken from the garrisons and sent to Ireland ; money, stores, and arms must be collected from every point and at any sacrifice. Knighthoods, increased pay, and rewards must be promised to officers to prompt them to activity. Nobles and bishops must arm their vassals ; Italy and Savoy must be scoured for war materials and men ; all the galleys must come from Naples for the defence of Spain ; ships must be sent to warn the Indies, and the King himself must write a letter to Aguila, urging him to stand firm until help reaches him, that at least will allow him to leave Ireland with honour.^ O'Donnell, deploring, beseeching, and exhorting, was propitiated with flattery and presents ; but when he asked that the chief command of the new expedition should be given to the Adelantado, he was told that the latter was too great a personage for such a force as could be sent. In the tornado of fright that was passing over the Spanish Administration, the most extravagant advice was given. The Adelantado himself, unpractical as usual, stormed at the policy of sending aid by driblets : " which will only prolong the agony, and let the patient die after all." If only a great Armada had been sent under his command, as he advised, all would have been well ; and even now it might be done. Commissary-General Con- treras was for raising an army of 14,000 men for Ireland, half of whom might be Germans and Wal- loons shipped from Dunkirk. The King's confessor, Father Cordoba, thought they should be prepared for the worst ; but, as the poverty-stricken treasury could not hope to provide for the danger at all points, 1 The letter is printed in the Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. THE FALL OF KINSALE 467 *' the most important of all preparations will be to appease the anger of Almighty God, provoked by the vices and sins so prevalent in this country. We must therefore earnestly seek a remedy by mending our ways of life and by constant prayer." ^ In the midst of all this panic and despairing effort, another blow fell. The five ships loaded with men, arms, and stores, which had sailed from Lisbon late in December, under Martin de la Cerda, were driven back again by storm, the flagship alone having reached within sight of Kinsale. There she had captured eleven Irish boatmen, from whom it was learnt that the harbour was full of English ships and the town in possession of the Viceroy ; one of the sailors having that very day seen Don Juan del Aguila dining in public with the Queen's representative. La Cerda waited to hear no more, but sped off to Spain under every rag of sail. This news somewhat altered the plans. It was clear that matters could not wait until a great force was mustered from all quarters, and orders were given that La Cerda's squadron, with four more ships, should muster in Corunna, ready to sail with all the stores and men then ready, as soon as news came from Ireland of the real condition of affairs. In the ^ Colonel Scrapie's idea at this time was to raise the number of men for Ireland to 6000, and to send an embassy to Scotland in return for his brother's mission to Spain in the previous year. The " envoy was to be secretly instructed to assist the Catholics and endeavour to induce them to obtain possession of the little Prince (Henry). If this be done and he be married to the daughter of the Duke of Savoy, the Catholic faith may be restored in Scotland." Semple also thought that the West Highlanders might be induced to side with Spain, "as they are greatly devoted to the Spaniards, from whom they boast their descent" (Spanish Calendar, vol. iv.). 468 TREASON AND PLOT meanwhile Aguila, shut up in Kinsale,had been grow- ing desperate. Again and again he tried to cut his way out, but ineffectually ; and finally, on the last day of the year 1601 (O.S.), the Spanish general prayed for a parley. To Sir William Godolphin, who met him, he expressed his disgust at the Irish, being " not only weak and barbarous, but, as he feared, perfidious friends,"^ and finding Montjoy a gentle- manly foe, he offered terms of composition. If he might depart honourably for Spain, with all his people, arms, and stores, he was willing to surrender to the English the garrisons now occupied by the Spaniards ; but otherwise, he said, with a bit of true Spanish swagger, they *' would rather bury them- selves alive, and endure a thousand deaths, than to give way to one article that should savour of baseness or dishonour." Aguila, with his 2000 good fighting men, might doubtless, as he said, have held out for a considerable time longer, but he plainly con- fessed that, after Tyrone's behaviour, the Irish were not worth fighting for. For the English the pro- posal was distinctly advantageous, since Castlehaven, Dunboy, and Baltimore, as well as Kinsale, were to be delivered to them without further fighting, and the voluntary retirement of the Spanish invading force would be an object-lesson more significant to the world than their destruction by superior num- bers. Articles were accordingly soon agreed upon for the Spaniards to leave, with all their property, peacefully in English ships bound for Spain, of which they were to pay the freight. ^ One of his officers went further : " Surely," he said, " Christ never died for this people." SURRENDER OF AGUILA 469 Whilst the arrangements were being made for the transport of the Spaniards, Aguila and his principal officers lived with the Lord-Deputy in Cork, and one of the Spanish pinnaces sent from Corunna to carry the King's letter already mentioned, and others to his general, came into l^antry. Don Juan del Aguila was now at peace with England, and techni- cally had a right to receive his letters without hindrance; but we are told that Montjoy's "heart itched " to know what was in them, and Carew, who thought everything fair in war against the Irish, arranged to have the courier waylaid and robbed as if by thieves, and the letters were accordingly stolen and brought to Carew whilst Aguila was at dinner with him. The Spaniard, when he heard of the treatment of his courier, was indignant and ** vehemently suspicious ; " but good George Carew lied to him like a patriot, and offered a large reward for the discovery of his own instruments. The letters may now be read in " Pacata Hibernia," and that of the King in the Spanish Calendar, vol. iv., and con- firm the account of the active preparations in Spain to help the beleaguered force, which I have already given from the Simancas manuscripts ; but, as we have seen, the letters came too late, and Don Juan del Aguila and the last of his men sailed out of Kinsale on the 8th March 1602, with a " flattering gale," and the last struggle of expiring Spanish potency to force Catholic supremacy upon Eng- land through Ireland ended thus in ignominious failure.^ ' Don Juan del Aguila had carried with him to Ireland a large number of gold chains, to the value of 2000 ducats, and ten swords of 470 TREASON AND PLOT Whilst Don Juan was feasting in dignified fashion with the English commanders in Cork and ex- changing mordant witticisms with George Carew, O'SuUivan and the O'DriscoUs were raging and fuming. Their castles and harbours had been volun- tarily handed to the Spaniards, to hold for the King ; not to surrender to the English without striking a blow. For Irish chiefs to rebel was nothing new, and nothing very heinous ; almost every great gentleman in Ireland had been a rebel at one time or another, and pardon could always be had by sub- mission. But though it was not unpardonable to rebel, it was the blackest of treason to surrender the Queen's dominion to the King of Spain, her relent- less enemy. The O'Sullivans and O'DriscoUs had, doubtless, thought that the English rule over Ire- land was doomed, and had sought salvation by en- thusiastic adhesion to their new masters. When they found that they had made a mistake their rage and dismay knew no bounds. Our old acquaint- ance, Pedro Lopez de Soto, who was in command at Castlehaven, peacefully delivered the place to Cap- tain Harvey ; but before the force to occupy it had arrived, the O'DriscoUs slipped into the fortress and held it against the Spaniards. Whilst the latter were fighting to recover it, the English entered the harbour and the O'DriscoUs retired. Baltimore and honour, to be distributed amongst the Irish chiefs after the expected victory. These presents were taken back to Spain by the general, and early in the following year (1603) an interniinaljle discussion took place in the King's Council as to their whereabouts and destination. It was at last agreed that the chains and swords should be again sent to Ire- land in the new expedition of aid then being prepared in Corunna under the command of Don Martin de la Cerda, but which never .sailed. O'SULLIVAN IN DUNBOY 471 Doneshead were delivered by the Spaniards without difficulty, and old Sir Finnan O'Driscoll surrendered himself to mercy, whilst his more warlike sons, except those who had been killed before Kinsale, lurked in hiding, later, as will be told, to escape to Spain. Dunboy and Bearhaven were a more difficult business. The first English company of nearly 200 men sent in a hoy from Cork to receive the surrender were driven back by foul weather and lost fifty or sixty men from plague ; and when, finally, an Eng- lish force appeared before Dunboy, they found that Donal O'Sullivan had been before them, and had surprised his own fortress. From the inside the chief and his servants had, in the dead of night, pierced a hole through the wall and had admitted eighty of his clansmen, with Father Archer the Jesuit, Thomas Fitzmaurice, Lord of Linxnaw, William Burke, Captain Tyrrell, and others. At daylight the priest Archer had begged the Spanish Captain Francisco de Saavedra to go with him to O'SuIlivan's chamber. There he was told by the chief that he (O'Sullivan) would hold his castle himself for the King of Spain. He had 1000 armed clansmen outside and 80 inside the walls, and re- sistance -was useless. The Spaniards were all dis- armed, not unwillingly, it was said, and most of them were sent to Baltimore and so to Spain. Aguila was indignant, and wanted to recapture the place again for the English, but Montjoy only wished to see the back of the Spaniards and preferred to conquer O'Sullivan himself. Before this happened, O'Sullivan wrote the second 472 TREASON AND PLOT of his series of eloquent letters to Spain.^ It was addressed to Count Caracena, the Governor of Galicia, who had written to tell him that O'Donnell was coming with aid to Ireland, Indignantly, O'Sullivan tells the story of the betrayal of his castle by Aguila. " If this place of mine be sur- rendered with the rest to the enemy, all of us who are faithful to his Majesty in Munster will be lost and the spirit of our people broken. I, by God's grace, can serve his Majesty anywhere with a thousand men armed in our Irish fashion, and will muster them at my own cost from my twenty leagues of well-protected coast. But once my castle, the chief stronghold of my land, is surrendered to the enemy, I shall be reduced to such straits that my people will follow my castles, and the Queen of England will get both. I must take refuge in the woods, there to live miserably amongst the wild beasts until some lure entrap me, and I am led to my death." A day or two later (February 22) he wrote a series of letters to the King, to Lerma, to Zubiaur, to Caracena, and others, all in the same strain of indignant determination. He would lose, he said, 2000 vassals by the surrender of his land, and " would barely find twenty to follow him to the woods and mountains, there to live like wolves until the English entrap us." In the Spanish despatch -boat that carried these heart-breaking epistles to Corunna, O'Sullivan sent his eldest son and other boys of his kin, amongst whom was the future historian, Philip O'SuUevan, with Donal, son ' Most of these were intercepted and are in " Pacata Hibernia," but there are two others in the Spanish Calendar, vol. iv., from Simancas. THE MARCH OF THE O'SULLIVANS 473 of Sir Finnan O'Driscoll, to clamour still for the Irish who were holding out for Spain in Dunboy. Of the heroic defence of O'Sullivan's castle for four long months, and of its sanguinary destruction ; of the marvellous march of O'Sullivan and his clan through the west of Ireland from the wilds of Glen- garrifi' to Connaught, after holding out for a whole year, this is not the place to relate in detail. The legends and ballads of Ireland are full of references to the heroism which led the O'SuUivans, men, women, and children, to the number of nearly 1000, over rugged mountains and swollen rivers, fighting and famishing, two-thirds the length of Ireland, from Bantry Bay to the O'Rourke stronghold at Leitrim, there to arrive a poor remnant of only 35 spent souls whilst Tyrone was already making good terms with the English. Thenceforward O'Sullivan and his kinsmen were Spanish nobles and Ireland knew him no more; for, plead to Elizabeth as he might for forgiveness, his crime was unpardonable. Devout as was doubtless his Catholicism, and loud as was his professed detestation of English rule, we must need look facts in the face, and admit that his Homeric struggle was, in good truth, neither for his faith nor his country, but only for the O'Sullivan lands and lordships, to which he had no right but the favour of the English law, and which he had by all rules forfeited by treason against the sovereign to whom he had sworn allegiance. The news of Aguila's capitulation and return to Spain caused the abandonment of the preparations for a great expedition to Ireland. It was patent to every one now that Tyrone had overstated his in- 474 TREASON AND PLOT fluence, and was a weak reed upon which to rest the conquest of Ireland. But still it was considered necessary for Spain to keep up English alarm by supporting the Irish who were in arms. O'Donnell in Corunna prayed fervently for an expedition in force. Writing to the King on April 15, 1602, he says : " Promptness is the very essence of success. . . . I see the time going on apace, and as every hour passes, nearer and nearer approaches the knife to the throats of the faithful band of brave, sorely tried people, whose hope alone is in God's mercy and in your Majesty's pity. I cannot help repeating my sorrowful reminders. . . . If I do not arrive within a month in the north of Ireland, I will not say with 2000 soldiers, but with 1500 or even 1000, with victuals, munitions, stores, and money, to raise 5000 or 6000 natives, and to sustain the war by expelling the enemy from O'Neil's country and my own, I doubt if a large force arriving from your Majesty even in June will be in time to find any- thing there but the blood and ashes of the multitude of faithful believers in your Majesty." O'Donnell's plan was to sail at once for Killibegs, which he would make his base of operations, and to form a junction with O'Neil by Donegal and Sligo ; but Caracena, with whom he stayed, and to whom he clamoured, as he says, day and night, was not in favour of sending hurriedly a small number of men, but rather to " feed " Tyrone with munitions, food, and money until a larger expedition could be got ready. At last, in despair, O'Donnell prayed that if all his supplications were unavailing he should at least be allowed " to go thither myself to end my DEATH OF O'DONNELL 475 life with the rest of the Catholics of the north." But Philip III. could not think of such a thing, and Red Hugh O'Donnell could only weep and pray for his lost cause. At length, in the autumn of 1602, the beaten chief obtained permission to go to court and personally urge the Irish Catholic cause upon Philip and Lerma. They were at Valladolid, and O'Donnell with his train was lodged seven miles away, in the ancient castle of Simancas, where his beseeching letters were first transcribed by the pre- sent writer. There, worn out with grief and anxiety, Red Hugh was seized with a burning fever, and the great Irishman, almost the only one of the chiefs who displayed any real disinterestedness in this struggle, ended his short, strenuous life. Whether his end was hastened by the poison hinted at by Carew or not, I cannot say, but probably it was not.^ In any case, his death left the Irish cause with no great-hearted champion, for Tyrone ruffled and smiled for years afterwards, a fine gentleman at the English court, until the crafty hands of James and Cecil fastened upon Ulster, and the " plantation " of the country drove out of it the race that looked upon O'Neil as its prince, as well as O'Neil himself. O'Donnell's faithful confessor. Father Florence ^ Carew to iMontjoy. — May 28, 1602.— "James Blake of Galway . , . departed from me and is gone into Spain, with a determination, bound by many oaths, to kill O'Donnell. God give him strength and perse- verance " (Carew Papers). Same to the same. — October 1602. — "O'Donnell is dead, and I do think it will fall out that he is poisoned by James Blake, of whom your Lordship hath been formerly acquainted. At his coming into Spain he was suspected by O'Donnell, because he embarked at Cork under my authority, but afterwards he insinuated his access and O'Donnell is dead " (ibid.). 476 TREASON AND PLOT Conroy, continued to press, as his master had done, for help to the Ulstermen ; the Adelantado still pro- pounded flighty schemes for the conquest of England and Ireland/ for which he was severely snubbed by the Council ; the King's confessor, Father Cordoba, assured Philip that Tyrone could hold out until the spring (1603) if money and arms were sent to him by La Cerda ; and one O'Driscoll after the other came backwards and forwards to Corunna, and prayed fervently that something should be done for the Munster Catholics. A few remittances of money and stores were sent to them, but after the exodus of the O'Sullivans and the submission of Tyrone, the clamour and prayers of the Irish priests and refugees died down. Red Hugh's son, like O'Sulli- van, became a Spanish noble, leaving worthy de- scendants to-day in the higher grandeeship ; those of the O'Driscoll blood who dared not go back to their native land settled down into Spanish citizens ; Tyrone himself long afterwards fled and saw Ireland no more. Tyrone's son died a Spaniard, fighting for his adopted country thirty years after his father's surrender, and thus ingloriously the hope flickered out of Spain's great dream. Powerless long ago to conquer England, as she first dreamed of doing, or of carrying Catholicism by force across the Scottish border, this last failure brought home to her what to the rest of the world was proved by evidence, that ^ In the spring of 1602 the Adelantado was full of a great scheme for the invasion of England direct, by the co-operation of a force of 14,000 from Spain with Federico Spinola from Flanders, who could, he said, bring 11,000 Germans, Walloons, and Italians in galleys from a Flemish port. SPAIN'S WANING DREAM 477 her administration had lost honesty and grip, that her sailors had lost boldness, that her captains had lost skill, and that her people had lost everything. Craft and cunning might yet prevail, but by force of arms nerveless Spain could aspire no more to dictate the religion of England. CHAPTER XIV Mission of Thomas James to Spain — The policy of Philip towards the English succession — Discussion in the Council of State — The new policy adopted too late. — Cecil's conduct — Dynastic intrigues in England — Arabella Stuart's strange behaviour — Suggested ex- planation — Lord Beauchamp — Attempted flight of Arabella — Death of Elizabeth — Cecil triumphant — Extinction of the last hope of Catholic supremacy by means of foreign intervention. The only result of the repeated petitions of the English Catholics urged upon Philip by Father Persons in Rome and Father Creswell in Madrid, and of the recommendations of the King's Council detailed in chapter xii,, had been the transmission of a message to the Duke of Sessa and Persons, informing them of the King's intention to adopt the candidature of his half-sister the Infanta to the crown of England. Persons was to convey this in- telligence to a very few only of the leading Catholics in England, the rank and file being simply assured generally that the King of Spain had not forgotten them, and would help them when the time came. The messenger by whom the English Catholics com- municated with Father Persons was one Thomas James, a rich London merchant settled in Spain/ and this man carried from Rome to his Catholic- Jesuit countrymen in Flanders the decision which 1 An account of this man will be found in Hatfield Papers, vol. viii. He" lived when at home at San Lucar, but travelled much. He com- municated with the Catholics in England through his brother, Francis James, a merchant in Bread Street, London. 478 THE MISSION OF THOMAS JAMES 479 had been sent to Sessa and Persons from Madrid. The uncompromising section to which he was ac- credited were not likely to be satisfied with so vague a message, and determined to make another effort, before it was too late, to urge the slothful Spaniards to action. With their renewed instances Thomas James arrived at the Spanish court in the early spring of 1602. He assured the King that "he found the Archduke well disposed, and the English Catholics anxious to participate in an action so conducive to the interests of the Catholic Church. But they were so loyal to the King of Spain that they would take no steps without his orders, and, consequently, the Archduke had sent him (James) to Spain, to make the proposals to the King himself. They had directed him to assure the King how they rejoiced at the news, and how humbly they thanked him for choosing such princes (i.e. the Archduke and the Infanta) for their sovereigns." This was all very well, but whether Thomas James and his country- men in Flanders understood it or not, it really meant that the Archduke would not raise a finger until he was assured that sufficient support would be sent to him from Spain to enforce his wife's claim against all competitors. He and the Infanta were in the midst of their hard struggle with Maurice of Nassau, a struggle which had already reduced their princi- pality to desolation, and almost to despair ; and they knew that to make an open offensive war upon England at the same time was absolutely beyond their power. They were middle-aged people, and were aware that they would be childless ; in addition 480 TREASON AND PLOT to which, as we have seen, their succession to the English crown was clogged with the condition of their surrendering the dominions which they had inherited ; and it is therefore not surprising that they displayed no enthusiasm in accepting the im- practicable task so vaguely suggested to them. It was Thomas James's mission from the English Catholics to obtain some practical decision from the King, instead of the hollow, sanctimonious bombast with which for years they had been put off, and to this end they submitted a list of sug- gestions. The Archduke, they thought, should make Ireland his base, and a large Spanish naval force and arsenals should be established there ; ^ and that the King should publicly and formally transfer his rights to the English crown to the Archduke and the Infanta. Money, too, must be sent to Flanders, in order that Dr. Garnet, the Provincial of the Jesuits in England, might carry on his work of gaining political adherents. Twenty galleys and thirty ships should be maintained in Flemish har- bours, ready for use at the critical moment, and, besides the troops who will go in them, they should carry arms sufficient to equip 6000 or 7000 English- men on their arrival. This force should be supple- mented by forty other ships, standing ready in Spain to convey a like number of men to England at the same time. They (the English Catholics) were quite confident of success if these measures were promptly adopted, for the King of Scots was very unpopular, and their friends in England were numerous. '* Even 1 It must be recollected that this was written before the capitulation of Kinsale was known in Flandeis. MISSION OF THOMAS JAMES 481 the heretics in office in England are only anxious to keep their places, and may easily be bought, and they will then gradually gain others to our side." But the Council could only report to the King in reply to all this that he had not a ducat to spare. The large sum which it had been decided to send to Flanders for the purpose two years before had never been sent. " Indeed," they told Philip, " nothing- whatever had been done, although the case was very important." But they sadly confessed that now much more than 200,000 ducats would be needed. The army in Flanders should be reinforced and the Spanish fleet mustered, ready for the pretended pro- tection of Spain and Italy, but the Council knew well that with an empty treasury all this was im- possible. O'Donnell and the Irishmen were fretting their hearts out for a tithe of the sum demanded by the English Catholics, and even that could not be provided. " If the money can be found for all this/' the Council told Philip, " the blow can be struck at the right moment, and in force sufficient ; but if not, the Council can only repeat what it has already said when the affair of Scotland was under discussion." ^ At the same time the notorious George Ker, who, it will be recollected, had formerly served the King of Scots as a Catholic emissary, came to Madrid — apparently on his own account this time, and as a matter of business — to urge Philip to persevere in helping Tyrone (whose defeat was now known) by means of a large employment of Scottish ships and men, and by the purchase, through Ker, of course. 1 That is to say, to conciliate the interests which they could not suc- cessfully oppose, and make the best terms possible with James. 2 H 482 TREASON AND PLOT of a number of armed vessels, to hold the Irish coast for the Spaniards. Nothing, however, came of this either ; for it all meant money, and of money there was none to spare under such a king as Philip III., and such a Minister as the Duke of Lerma. But still, the constant advices received from England of the failing health of the Queen made it necessary that some move should be devised, unless the worst possible solution for Spain was to be adopted on the death of Elizabeth, without an attempt to prevent it. In November (1602), accord- ingly, Father Creswell once more urged upon Philip to take up the matter actively. Galleys and troops, he said, should be mustered in Flanders, to hasten to England the moment the Queen should die ; the Spanish fleet should be kept ready to sail ; foreign ships should be freighted : all the old counsels of activity and expenditure were repeated, for the claimants were many, said Creswell, and Spanish aid at the right moment would turn the scale. When this minute of Father Creswell's came for examination before the Council of State, utter helplessness dictated their report upon it. " Father Creswell should be thanked for reminding your Majesty of the papers he sent last year ; but it is difficult to know what to say about them, as they recommend the taking up of the Englisli enterprise ; and things are here in such a condition as to make this impossible." This was on the 5th December 1602 (N.S.), and up to this time it is evident that nothing whatever had been done to comply with the petitions of the English Catholics, or to promote SPANISH POLICY CHANGED 483 effectually a large party in England pledged to support Spanish Jesuit aims. Spaniards had been too proud to confess it, but it was now quite clear that the aims themselves, so far as they depended upon forcing the Infanta upon England as Elizabeth's successor, were abso- lutely impracticable and impossible. In any case, only by means of overwhelming force or popular consent could such a course have been feasible. That Spain could no longer wield such a force was demonstrated, and that the general feeling even of Catholics in England was violently opposed to a Spanish sovereign and to Jesuit methods, was proved by a hundred signs ; and more than all else, by the bitter antagonism of the English secular priests, and by the wholesale desertion to other orders of the Church of the English students in seminaries controlled by Jesuits. But it needed a bold man to tell the truth to Philip, and to propose means for making the best of matters as they were. The bold man was found in Guzman, that haughty, rough-tongued Count of Olivares, who had lectured and bullied Pontiffs for years as Spanish ambassador in Rome. What was the good, he asked, of talk- ing any longer of the Archduke and the Infanta? Neither of them cared for the candidature : the King had no money or resources sufficient to force the Infanta on the English throne against the will of the nation ; nor would it be to his interest to do so, even if he could. Why not face the facts at once, and promise support to the most popular English Catholic claimant, and thus, at all events, keep out the King of Scots, who would otherwise walk into 484 TREASON AND PLOT the succession without an effort ? This was very un-Spanish in its practical directness, and it took tlie King and the Council of State two months before they sufficiently recovered from the shock to discuss and decide upon the matter finally for the King's guidance. On the 5th February and the 2nd March 1603 (N.S.), accordingly, the whole matter of Spain's policy towards the English succession was passed under review in the light of this new idea. The English ('atholics, for whom Persons and Creswell spoke, had in the interim again urged, through the latter, that Philip should either make effective preparations for action on the Queen's death, or else relieve them of their pledges to support the Infanta or any other Spanish nominee. If they knew that they had to depend only upon themselves, they might take some course advantageous to their cause ; but if they were kept in suspense until a vacancy occurred, they were certain that the King of Scotland would succeed. They rather indignantly pointed out that, after all their years of devotion to Spain, they and their cause were likely to be ruined by the fault of the Catholic King. In addition to this, Zuniga, the ambassador, had been told by Henry IV., that if Philip would agree with him to nominate a neutral King of Eng- land, he would support him, but if Spain endea- voured to foist the Infanta, or any other avowedly Spanish candidate upon the throne, he (Henry IV.) would throw in his weight on the side of the King of Scots. The problem was thus complicated : Henry must be excluded, but yet prevented from helping James. All this made it necessary to discuss SPAIN FACES THE FACTS 485 again the whole of the candidates proposed three years before by the English Jesuit Catholics through Father Persons. The Infanta was ruled out, for the reasons already stated, and the Dukes of Savoy and Parma were dropped, because they were foreigners connected with Spain, and would be opposed by France. The only candidate, therefore, remaining on the list presented by Persons in 1600 was the son of the Earl of Worcester (Henry Somerset, Lord Herbert), but no specific reference to him was made in the new discussion. It was considered by the Council the absolute duty of the King to bring England, if possible, into the Catholic fold ; and with this end the Catholics of England were to be given to understand that he had no temporal interest of his own to serve ; no desire to control England or promote his own house. They (the English Catholics) had formerly prayed him to adopt the Infanta, and he had done so ; but if there were any other Catholic candidate of their own nation who would be more likely to unite the country, the King of Spain would cede his own rights to him and help him with might and main. He (the King), for his part, will immediately make ready for the eventuality, and urges the Catholics to choose their candidate, but not to announce his name prematurely. In the meanwhile, the Council prayed the King to have ships fitted out with all speed in Spain, a large sum of money sent to Flanders, and means devised for raising money in the abundance required. Count de Miranda here put in a word of reason. He thought they had better see first whether they could raise any money. 486 TREASON AND PLOT and in the meanwhile avoid offending the Kin^ of Scots by taking sides against him, until they knew they could crush him. But Poza said it would be better to have any heretic there rather than James ; and again Olivares came down with his cool (louche of common sense. He had always insisted, he said, that the greatness of the empire did not consist of a further extension of territory, and to help an English candidate for the throne was the only way to exclude James. As for listening to the canting professions of the latter of his readiness to become a Catholic and surrender his son in return for the payment of a sum of money and the support of Spain, he did not believe a word of it, nor of the talk of the Italian and French priests about the King of Scots' conversion. But still, he would not quite shut the door even against James, in case of unavoidable eventualities. The great thing now was that no time should be lost in assuring the English Catholics of effective support for the Catholic candidate of their choice ; their hatred of the Scots should be fomented ; very liberal promises of reward should be given to all prominent Catholics and heretics, " almost without distinction," and the various other claimants and their principal supporters should have given to them " estates, incomes, offices, grants, privileges, and exemptions ; almost, indeed, sharing the crown amongst them." Olivares recommended, too, that the anti-foreign cry should be promoted as much as possible in England ; whilst the people should be persuaded that the mighty King of Spain was behind the chosen English candidate, not for his NEW SPANISH PLANS 487 own ends, but in order that England might be happy, and prosperously governed by a native King of her own free choice. If possible, moreover, the Queen's Ministers were to be reconciled to the Catholics, and peace negotiations with them again initiated by Spain. The Pope, and through him the King of France, as well as the English themselves, were to be greatly impressed with the splendid magnanimity of Philip in surrendering his paramount claims to the English crown for the sake of the Catholic Church and the tranquillity of England. All these points were discussed ad nauseam, the object mainly being to save appearances, and to con- vince the world that the change of front was made from generosity, and not from want of power ; and the Pope especially was to be made an instrument for spreading this view of the subject and for dis- arming the King of France. At the same time it was made clear that Spain still intended, if she could, by religious chicanery to monopolise power in England. The troops in Flanders were to be landed in the Thames, or at any other point requested by the chosen candidate ; the Spanish ships were to land another force in the north-west of England, as near to the Scottish border as possible. The King- elect would take care that the English fleet would be no longer dangerous to the Spanish ships ; and Olivares thought that when the question of the gratitude of the new King towards Spain came to be discussed, there would be no difficulty in obtaining the cession of the Isle of Wight. On no account should an English port on the mainland be accepted by Spain, even if offered, to avoid offending France 488 TREASON AND PLOT or arousing English suspicion ; and if Henry IV. was very much discontented about Spain getting the Isle of Wight, he might have the Channel Islands to keep him quiet. The whole business was to be cautiously disclosed to Persons first, and to Cres- well^ after arrangements had been made with the Pope ; and when the time for action came, Father Persons was to hurry from Rome to Flanders and cross to England as cardinal with full power. This was the plan finally adopted by Spain for making England Catholic, and some activity really seems to have been exercised in obtaining the money necessary for the purpose ; but before the English Catholics themselves could be fully enlightened, it was considered necessary for Persons and Sessa to make sure of the Pope, and through him of the King of France. Father Creswell, in the mean- while, was chafing with impatience. His principals in England were sending him constant news of the growing weakness of the Queen and the impatience of the Catholics who looked to Spain. Creswell in the months of February and March haunted Lerma's ante-chambers, and prayed personally and by letter for a resolution that he might transmit to England. If he did not get one at once, he said, he would wash his hands of the whole business, and tell the English Catholics that they must take their own course, for he had lost hope. A person upon whom entire dependence could be placed, Federico Spinola, or another, would have to be appointed in Flanders ' It was decided that Creswell should be told at once if news came that Elizabeth was like to die. This was the case, aiid Creswell was told in March. FINAL ARRANGEMENTS 489 to make the final arrangements with the leading Catholics in England, and to act when the moment came ; the self-denying, soft-spoken proclamation to be published in England when the Spanish troops landed must be printed and sent to Flanders to be ready ; and, above all, urged Creswell, the one hun- dred thousand ducats which had been promised for transmission to the English Catholics should at once be obtained from Ambrosio Spinola, who had agreed to lend it. " Otherwise," says Creswell, " 1 must have permission to undeceive the persons to whom the promise was made. They have spent, and are spending, money on the public service, trusting to the pledge given to their messenger (Thomas James ?) by the Count de Miranda at San Lorenzo, and the delay in the matter looks very bad. They are, more- over, persons of so much importance that the whole success of the affair depends upon keeping them : and this can only be done by straightforward and punctual dealing." ^ It is plain from this that Creswell had now — the middle of March 1603 (N.S.) — been informed of the whole plan, and was hurriedly making the arrange- ments for at least the remittance to Flanders of the money to be used in gaining English support ; and as this money had been promised by Ambrosio Spinola on loan, it may be concluded that it was duly forwarded before Elizabeth's death was known in Spain, although it cannot have arrived in Flan- ders until after the event. At the same time as these deliberations were pro- ^ All the papers referred to above are in the Simancas MSS., and are printed in the Spanish Calendar, vol. iv. 490 TREASON ANP PLOT ceeding, one more effort was made by the Scottish Catholics to revive the plan suggested by Bothwell in the previous year, to restore Catholicism in Scot- land by means of Spanish troops. The Scottish lords sent Fernihurst (Andrew Ker) to Madrid with pro- posals to this end in March 1603. He, Colonel Semple, and Bothwell were urgent and persistent in their prayers to Philip, and the oifers they made would perhaps, at another time, have been tempt- ing. They would establish the faith in Scotland, re- inforce Ireland with troops and stores, and trouble the Queen of England from the west coast of Scot- land. They would surrender to the King of Spain the four great fortresses of Scotland, Dumbarton, Broughty, Blackness, and Hermitage, and in the event of war between Spain and England, would provide a mercenary army of 26,000 Scotsmen to help the Spaniards. All they asked in return was that a force of 4000 Spaniards should be sent to Scotland at the cost of Spain ; and they promised for repayment that, on the restoration of the Catholic faith, a third of the ecclesiastical revenues of the country should be set apart until the whole of the cost was reimbursed to the Spanish King. Bothwell tried hard also to make terms for his own reconcilia- tion with James as part of the arrangement, but the Spaniards declined to have anything to do with that ; and as the whole proposal was, like all previous ones from the same quarter, open to the suspicion that in the end the King of Scots alone might benefit by it, the Spanish King and Council discussed it unsympathetically, until the great news of James's peaceful accession to England rendered it obsolete. CECIL'S ATTITUDE 491 Whilst the fate of England was thus being dis- cussed and decided in leisurely fashion in Spain, matters in England itself were rapidly nearing the crisis. The secret of Sir Robert Cecil's close under- standing with James had been well kept even from the most intimate friends of the former,^ There were plenty of courtiers besides Cecil who sought the smiles of the rising sun, and their private advice to the coming King was duly conveyed by the latter to Cecil. It was natural, of course, that I'ilizabeth's oflficers and ministers should look with some anxiety to the future. The Queen was old and ailing, a disputed succession would inevitably mean civil war, and probably foreign invasion, and yet, so far as could be seen, the man who was of all others most responsible for the prosperity and order of the country was detached from every interest in tlie matter and free from anxiety for the future. His own political associates looked to him for a lead but did not get it. They knew that the traditional policy he had inherited was to keep Scotland and France at arm's length by a friendship of England with Flanders and Spain ; they saw that the talk of peace with these powers always found a ready listener in Cecil, and that practically peace now existed between the new sovereigns of Flanders and the Queen. Surely, thought those members of the " Moderate " party who had always followed Lord Burghley and his son, ** Mr. Secretary " will not 1 Cecil was in such fear tliat the correspondence mi^ht be discovered that on one occasion he prayed James not to write to him direct, but only through Lord Henry Howard. James, however, still continued to send some of his letters to Cecil. 492 TREASON AND PLOT stand helplessly by and see his own ruin consum- mated by the unchecked accession of a King whose national policy had always been that of Cecil's enemies. Ralegh, his old friend, Cobham, his brother-in-law, and others like them, tried to draw from him some expression of his sympathies and intentions, and that he purposely deceived them is seen by his own ungenerous words written to James on the subject : "This I do profess in the presence of Him that knoweth and searcheth all men's harts, that if I dyd not some tyme cast a stone into the mouth of these gaping crabbs, when they are iu their prodigal humour of discourses, they would not stick to confess dayly how contrary it is to their nature to resolve to be under your sovereignty, though they confess (Ralegh especially) that [rebus sic sta7itihus) natural policy forceth them to keep on foot such a trade against the great day of mart. In all which light and sudden humours of his, though I do no way check him, because he shall not think I reject his freedom or his affection, but alwaies {sub sigillis confessionis) use contestation with him that I neyther had, nor would ever in individuo contemplate future idea, nor ever hoped for more than justice in time of change, yet under pretext of extraordinary care for his well doing I have seemed to dissuade him from engaging himself too farr even for himself, much more therefore to forbeare to assume for me or my present inten- tions." ^ Such talk as this from Cecil to Ralegh under the circumstances the latter must have known ^ Letters of James VI. and Sir Robert Cecil. Hatfield (published by the Camden Society). BETRAYAL OF THE MODERATES 493 to be insincere. It was evidently intended to pre- vent an approach of Ralegh to James, and to encourage him to proceed w^ith any plans he might have for arranging the succession on the traditional lines of the party to which both he and Cecil be- longed. That this was the case is seen by Cecil's anger, expressed in his letter to the King that the Duke of Lennox, who had recently passed through London, should have approached Ralegh and others of the Cecil party with the object of gaining them to the King's side.^ A more startling proof still is seen in the dastardly letter from Lord Henry Howard to Cecil,^ suggesting how Ralegh, Northumberland, Cobham, and others of the party should be led astray and ruined, both in the eyes of Elizabeth and of James. " So must you embark this gallant Cobham by your wit and interest in some course the Spanish waie, as either may reveale his weak- ness or snare his ambition. ... Be not unwilling ... to engage him in the traffic with suspected ministers, and upon the first occasion of further treaty (with Spain) to make him the Minister. For my part, I account it impossible for him to scape the snares which wit may set and weakness is apt to fall into." By this it is evident that it was the delibe- rate plan of Cecil and his ame damnee, Howard, to use Cobham and Ralegh especially as their uncon- scious instruments. To tempt them by half hints, opportunity, and significant glances to enter into any negotiation tending against the candidature of the 1 Letters of James VI. and Sir Robert Cecil. Hatfield (published by the Camden Society). ^ British Museum MSS., Cotton. Titus, cvi. 386. 494 TREASON AND PLOT King of Scots, with the double object of allowing Cecil to keep in touch with and frustrate any intrigue that was afoot, and of ruining friends who might possibly become rivals. How far the Jesuit intrigues for the succession really extended in England it is now extremely diffi- cult to decide. We have seen by the deliberations of the Spanish Council and by Father Creswell's importunities that no decided action was taken or any large sums of money sent from Spain to the English Catholics in Flanders, at least until within a week or ten days before Elizabeth's death, and it was not possible for the 100,000 ducats promised to have reached Brussels in time for employment before that event. But we have also Creswell's word for it that his principals were already spending consider- able sums of money by anticipation, and it may be concluded that the English Catholics of the Jesuit party were acquainted with the probable intention of Spain to help any acceptable native Catholic chosen by them in place of the Infanta, as their candidate for the English throne, before the discus- sion in the Spanish Council of the ^^e^r^ary ^^^3- This being the case, we shall be safe in assuming that any movement at about this period amongst Catholics and others in England to promote the accession of a native-born candidate as opposed to the Scotsman, was connected more or less directly with the series of deliberations in Spain and Flan- ders, which have been described in the preceding pages. The only English candidate mentioned in the THE ENGLISH CANDIDATES 495 petition of the English Catholics to the Spanish King upon which the deliberations referred to were based was the Earl of Worcester ; but in the inter- minable discussions in the Council, neither his name nor any other was adopted, in order, apparently, that the choice of the English themselves should seem to be quite spontaneous. It is, however, im- probable that matters had gone so far as for Spain to promise powerful armed and pecuniary aid with- out some general understanding as to the person likely to be selected. It is to be noticed that in the course of the discussions in the Council the person to be chosen is always referred to in the masculine gender, and when the question was considered what reply should be given to the English if they sug- gested, "as they had done before," a marriage be- tween the English sovereign of their choice and a member of the King of Spain's family, it was agreed that "inasmuch as France would be just as jealous that the Queen (Consort) of England should be of your Majesty's kin as if the King were, and as such a marriage would additionally pledge your Majesty's prestige in the success of the undertaking, and it might be advantageous to the Catholics to have the disposal of both positions, and thus enable them to reconcile difficulties and silence discontents, the Council is of opinion that your Majesty should reply that . . . you think best to leave them absolute freedom of action in this particular." It will be seen by this that the Spanish Council, at all events, anticipated the choice of a man and a bachelor. Whom could they have had in their minds ? The young Earl of Worcester had already 496 TREASON AND PLOT been married three years, and from his character and subsequent action it would appear extremely improbable that he was the person now thought of. The Earl of Derby was not likely to be approached after his reception of previous advances — though his sister had been mentioned more than once — nor was the Earl of Cumberland, who was an avowed Puritan and also extremely unpopular with the Spaniards for his depredations upon their shipping. The Earl of Huntington, the representative of the Poles, was also a Puritan, and certainly had no connection with the Catholics. There only remained, therefore, Ara- bella Stuart and the descendants of Catherine Grey, and it is quite possible that this may lead us to the threshold of the mystery which has always sur- rounded the doings of these personages at the period, behaviour so extraordinary in the case of xirabella as to lead those who knew her to conclude that she was mad. Some of the gossip of the English Jesuit party, with regard to the selection of a candidate to take the place of the Infanta, and pointing to Arabella Stuart, must have reached the ears of James as early as 1601 ; for writing to his secret agent. Lord Henry Howard, in that year, he deplores " this accident fallen to Arbell," and expresses a hope that for " her own weal such order were taken as she might be preserved from evil company, and that evil-inclined persons might not have access unto her, to supplant, abusing of the frailty of her youth and sex ; for if it be true, as I am credibly informed, that she is lately moved by the persuasions of the Jesuits to change her religion and declare herself a Catholic . . . she ARABELLA STUART 497 hath been very evil attended on." That she had been sounded by the party with this end is certain, for we have already seen that in the confidential accounts given by the English Jesuits to the Spanish King she is distinctly called a Catholic ; but from the absence of any specific mention of her in the subsequent Spanish discussions, and from the assump- tion throughout that the candidate was to be a man, it is clear that she had not openly avowed herself a Catholic, and was not at this time the principal person in the minds of the anti-Scottish Catholics as their candidate for the throne. The correspondence of the Jesuit Father Rivers in England with Father Persons in Rome ^ in the following year confirms this, as he mentions her (March 1602) in connection with a supposed plan of a party in England to place her upon the throne by French aid. Although there was no truth in this rumour, its transmission from one influential Jesuit to another shows that Arabella, at this period at least, was not the principal candidate of their party. A few months later (July 1602) Father Rivers informed Persons that he hears of an intention of marrying Arabella to the Earl of Hert- ford's second son, " and to carry the succession that way ; but these supra nos nihil ad nos." This seems to form the first clue to what I conceive was the plan of the anti-Scottish Catholics in union with Spain. Matters had not been going smoothly for some time at Hardwick Hall. Arabella was fretting and chafing at what she considered the undeserved semi- imprisonment in which she was kept by her grand- mother. She was disappointed at the way in which 1 Foley Papers. 2 I 498 TREASON AND PLOT she had been treated by the Queen, sometimes flattered with the idea that she was regarded as her successor, and sometimes exposed to humiliation if any of the courtiers dared to look towards her. She had incurred the Queen's displeasure, amongst other things, by some sort of flirtation with Essex, and now that she was buried at Hardwick, she, and those around her, were treated with ever-increasing suspicion. She was, on the other hand, as amorous, and probably as ambitious, as Elizabeth herself had been at a similar age, and evidently endeavoured to imitate the behaviour of Elizabeth before her acces- sion. Both her Cavendish and her Talbot uncles sympathised with her ; and her aunt, the Countess of Shrewsbury, her greatest friend and a Catholic, was un- questionably in communication with the Jesuit party. Negotiations of some sort were in progress between Arabella and these relatives of hers in 1602, and during the summer of that year she endeavoured to plan a flight from Hardwick by the aid of a chaplain and tutor named Starkey, whose mysterious pro- ceedings with her and his subsequent suicide gave rise to an infinity of gossip and questionable scandal. At some period early in that summer a suggestion had been made, circuitously and secretly, by the Earl of Hertford, or his son Lord Beauchamp, for a marriage between Arabella and one of the two sons of the latter. On the face of it the suggestion was absurd, as the two boys in question were then only sixteen and fourteen years old respectively, whilst Arabella was twenty-seven. When the idea was broached to the old Countess of Shrewsbury she was in great alarm, and forbade all further mention of ARABELLA AND THE SEYMOURS 499 such a project ; but late in December of the same year, 1602, Arabella, either because she now better understood the significance of such a match, or simply, as she pretended afterwards, to enable her to get out of the clutches of her grandmother, renewed the negotiation on her own account with the con- nivance of her uncles. With much difficulty, for every one was in mortal fear of the old Countess, she managed to induce a servant, one Dodderidge, to carry to the Earl of Hertford a letter of credence from her, and a verbal message to the effect that if he still wished for the marriage formerly proposed between his eldest grandson and herself he should renew the negotiation in another way and not through the old Countess. She suggested also that the boy suitor should be sent in disguise to Hard- wick, in order that she might see him ; and her Cavendish uncles were mentioned as approving of the step she was taking. The messenger arrived at Tottenham Park on the 30th December 1602, and with some trouble obtained access to the Earl, who was at dinner. Kneeling, he delivered his message out of earshot of the other persons in the room ; but before the words were well out of his mouth, Hertford, in great perturbation, bade him be silent, and, placing the hapless mes- senger under lock and key, he sent post-haste to reveal the whole matter to the Council, and to beg for orders as to what course he should take. At first sight, this action of Hertford's was inexpli- cable if he had, as was apparently the case, previously made the same proposal secretly himself; and we are driven to seek an explanation of his inconsistency 500 TREASON AND PLOT in any change of the circumstances that had taken place in the interim. His own venture in that field had probably rendered Hertford somewhat shy of dynastic marriages; he could have nothing personally to gain by plunging himself and his family into re- volutionary action unless with a certainty of success, and it is most likely that the initiative had in the first place come rather from his son, Lord Beauchamp, than from Hertford himself. He must have seen, moreover, how rapidly James's chances had advanced during the course of the year, and what looked possible when the proposal was first made might look impossible later. But all this, though it may explain Hertford's inconsistency, does not explain the subsequent proceedings of Ai-abella and Lord Beauchamp. In any case, Hertford's message caused an immense sensation at court, and the air was full of strange rumours and conjectures. The Queen was in a towering rage.^ Hertford himself was summoned to explain personally ; the messenger was brought to London and examined again and again, though he had nothing fresh to tell ; and Sir Henry Brounker was sent down to Hardwick to examine Arabella herself. He found her flighty, fractious, and hys- terical, contradicting herself repeatedly, writing in- terminable letters so obscure that no one then or since could fathom their meaning. Full of hints at one time of some mysterious love affair, talking of "my little little love," and bewailing that she, a grown woman, could not have a sweetheart like any- ' The Venetian ambassador in London says that the chagiin shortened her life. ARABELLA'S BEHAVIOUR 501 body else ; and then suddenly declaring that the man to whom she is attached is — of all persons — her cousin, the King of Scots. At the beginning of February her confidant, Starkey, hanged himself in London, and this set afloat another swarm of rumours. At one time (February 21) Arabella de- termined to get out of her grandmother's clutches somehow, and resolutely refused to eat or drink under her roof. The old lady herself was extremely unwise, exaggerating and treating with undue seriousness Arabella's "tantrums," and Sir Henry Brounker was kept continually running backwards and forwards for two months, trying ineffectually to discover what it all meant. On the 2nd March Arabella wrote a letter to Brounker, asserting that she was " free from all promise, contract, or inten- tion to marry," and declared that she would never do so, as she preferred death to matrimony. She complained that her "conceits" were taken seriously, and, at another time, confessed to Brounker that what she said was only for the purpose of mystifying him. To the Queen she wrote long, incoherent letters, praying that she might tell her the great secret personally, and said that two lines from the Queen's own hand would gain more from her than all the councillors could. ^ I The correspondence and examinations are at Hatfield, and have, to a great extent, been printed in Miss E. T. Bradley's "Life of Arabella Stuart." One important letter is in Edward's "Life and Letters of Ralpgh," in which Arabella hints that those who are abetting her are abroad. " I can assure you that all that are of my counsell are out of all possibility of danger and out of your reach. Neither doth her Majesty's commandment prevail so far, though her fame and entreaty be everywhere glorious and powerful. And for myself, I will rather spit my tongue in my examiner or torturer's face than it shall be said . . . that an extorted truth came out of my lips." 502 TREASON AND PLOT As the Queen's death became daily more immi- nent the plot thickened. Both Beaumont, the French ambassador, and Father Rivers mentioned early in March that the Earl and Countess of Shrewsbury were " very inward " with Secretary Cecil, with whom they had constant secret meetings ; and rumours of the wildest character were rife about the proceedings of Arabella, Father Eivers repeating a strange rumour that Cecil was going to marry her himself and raise her to the throne. We can understand now better than his contemporaries why Cecil was so friendly and confidential with the Catholic Shrewsburys, in whose plans for their niece he was probably pre- tending to be a consenting party until the moment came for action. On March lo Henry Cavendish and a Catholic gentleman named Stapleton — a rela- tive, be it noted, of the most influential English Catholic ecclesiastic in Flanders — mustered a squad- ron of forty horsemen in the neighbourhood of Hard- wick Hall. The leaders, one of whom had a lady's pillion upon his horse, awaited, according to agree- ment with Arabella, at the church of Hucknall, about half a mile from Hardwick, But the redoubt- able old Bess, secretly forewarned, no doubt, by Cecil, caused her granddaughter to be prevented from leav- ing the domain. Finding that she came not, Henry Cavendish and his friends rode up to his mother's gates and demanded to see his niece. The old Countess admitted her " bad son," as she called him, but warned the Papist, Stapleton, away. Henry Cavendish endeavoured to convey his niece outside to his horsemen, but the Countess had assembled her household and tenants, and a stormy scene ensued, ARABELLA'S FLIGHT PREVENTED 503 in which Arabella indignantly demanded if she was a prisoner, and conversed through the closed gates with Stapleton, with whom she arranged a meeting for the following day. But by this time the alarm had spread, the Countess declaimed and protested ui^hi et orbi, and Stapleton sought safety in flight, whilst Cavendish was summoned by the Council to I^ondon, and Arabella was carried oft" to Wrest House, where, under the guardianship of the Earl of Kent, all hope of her escape was gone. Simultaneously with this attempt to abduct Arabella, Lord Beauchamp, who had recently become a widower, and was, it is said, be- trothed to her, also disappeared,^ and it is impossible not to see a connection between the two facts. From a consideration of all these circumstances it would appear probable that, although Hertford him- self was a Protestantj as befitted a son of the Pro- tector Somerset, Lord Beauchamp, the direct heir to the crown under the will of Henry Vni., was ready to accept Spanish and Catholic aid to raise him to the throne, and that, at a period subsequent to the autumn of 1602, the Jesuit party conceived the plan of conciliating Arabella's friends and consolidating the Catholic forces by a union between the two claimants. The plan, if it existed, was a clever one, for the Grey-Seymour succession would not fail to please the Protestant party, whilst the anti-Scottish Catholics, of course, would have rejoiced at the ex- clusion of James and the accession of monarchs under the patronage of Spain. But it is evident 1 Venetian Calendar, Scaramelli to the Doge, March 20, 1 603. It will be recollected that years before this we have seen Beauchamp on the point of escaping to Spain. 504 TREASON AND PLOT that Cecil had his hand on the intrigue. His " in- wardness" with the Shrewsburys gave him all the information he needed about the plans of Arabella's friends, and doubtless Hertford's panic when he received Arabella's message was owing to a warn- ing that Cecil had been made acquainted by the old Countess, and disapproved of, the former matri- monial proposal to Arabella ; as well as to the con- viction that James's accession had now become inevitable. These feelings may not have been shared by his son, who was more adventurous and more directly interested than Hertford him- self, and the balance of probability seems to incline to the conclusion that Beauchamp and Arabella were the persons indicated as the candidates of the Spanish Catholic party to succeed to Elizabeth by the aid of the ships, troops, and money of King Philip. But the plot failed even before it reached maturity, first, from the vigilance and secrecy of Cecil, which enabled him to tranquillise James and make every preparation for his peaceful accession, whilst remain- ing himself, to all appearance, so entirely detached as to invite the confidence of his own partisans; and, secondly, from the procrastination and unreadiness of the Spanish King and his Ministers ; who, as we have seen, were prosily deliberating and laying down a course of action that would take months to de- velop, whilst Elizabeth had but a few days to live. England was thus kept peacefully Protestant at the critical moment by the craft of Cecil and the sloth of Spain. As the hour approached for which James had so ACCESSION OF JAMES 505 long and impatiently yearned ; the hour when he might mount the "towardly rydding horse of St. George," in- stead, as he said, of " daily burstin in daunting a wylde, unreulie coalte," men of all parties in England understood that nothing was likely to stand in the way of his accession. On March 17 Northumber- land wrote to him saying that the Queen had been "evil now almoaste a month." The fact had been kept secret for twelve days and the indisposition was ascribed to Elizabeth's anger at the conditions granted to Tyrone, to Arabella's strange vagaries, and to the Countess of Nottingham's death ; but at length the truth had to be told. The Queen ate and slept but very little and the " phisitions conclud that if this contineu she must needes fall into a distemper, not a frensie, but rather a dulnesse and a lethargic." The Venetian envoy in London, writing on the same day (March 17), says that on the anniversary of Essex's death a few days before, "the Queen had burst into tears and dolorous lamentations, as though for some deadly sin she had committed, and then fell ill of a sickness, which the doctors instantly judged to be mortal." As the great Queen lay dying at liichmond all things were made ready. Eight fine galleons, fully armed, and with 500 troops on board of each one, lay in the Thames ; the City of London was secured ; Cecil's brother, Burghley, commanded in the north ; the doubtful recusants throughout the country were cast into prison/ and the draft proclamation to • Bruce writes (for King James) to Lord Henry Howard (for Cecil): "The means are most politique and wise by which yow have dispersed the clowd of ane apparent Popish uprore, and it is a very safe and singu- larly good rewle rather to prevent than to be prevented; but we did so 5o6 TREASON AND PLOT be issued by the new King was sent for his approval by Cecil/ " This accident," wrote Northumberland to the King in reference to the Queen's illness, "made all the nation looke about them. Men talke freely of your Majestie's rights, and all in general gives you a great allowance. The affections of many are discovered to be wholly devoted to your service. Every one almost embraces you." The only thing necessary now to stamp the seal of right upon the claim of James was for the Queen at her last hour to acknowledge him as her successor, and this requisite was thoughtfully provided by Cecil to make his work complete. Elizabeth lay speechless with her hand in that of the Primate when Cecil and the Council clustered around her couch. On the mention of the King of Scots' name the Secretary asserted that the dying sovereign gave a mute sign of assent. It was enough, and almost before the Queen's last sigh was breathed, Robert Cary was galloping along the north road as hard as swift horses could speed bearing the pregnant news to the new King. We have seen that for years past, when it suited him, James had professed his leaning towards Catho- licism, and even since the friendship with Cecil had rendered unnecessary his advances to the Pope and Spain, he had certainly led Catholics of all sorts to muche trust in your Industrie that if thay had gon on to do their worst yow could have pulled such feathers from their wings as might have made them come shorte of the great prey they hunted for " (Letters of Cecil and James, Camden Society). ^ " Music," wrote Bruce, " which soundeth so sweetly in his ears that he cannot alter no note in so agreeable an harmony" (Ibid.). "It sail not be amiss," wrote the same agent, " if yow temper the King's too great haste in removing hence in case God sail call the Queen . . . for now he burnes to be gone." JAMES AND THE CATHOLICS 507 expect at least toleration at his hands. The Catho- lics, checkmated as they were, and unprepared either with an organisation or the assurance of foreign aid, could only hope for the best, and hasten as they might to secure the smiles of the monarch, from whom a large number of them had reason to expect some sympathy.^ A bold voice here and there, like that of Ralegh, dared to say a word of remonstrance at the adulation with which Englishmen were preparing to receive the King of a nation which they had always been taught to look upon with disdain — " to spoil a gude King," as one of James's Scottish courtiers said ; but as a rule, each man was thinking of his own future, and the race to greet the King was not for the purpose of imposing conditions upon him, but to encourage him in his extremest ideas of the sacredness of the royal prerogative. Even the Jesuit party, either in hopelessness of help from Spain or in the real belief that James would keep his word, welcomed the new King ; and Father Garnet, the Provincial, burnt two briefs of the Pope exhorting English Catholics to allow no one to succeed to the throne who did not promise at least toleration.' They were soon unde- 1 In a notable secret letter to Cecil, in reply to the latter's remark that he did not like to see loyal Catholics sacrificed by dozens, James said, " I will never allow in my conscience that the blood of any mau shall be shedde for diversitie of opinions in religion ; and I would be sorry that Catholiques should so multiplie as they might be able to practise their old principles upon us. I will never agree that any should dye for erroure of faith against the first table ; but I think they should not be permitted to worke rebellion against the second table . . . No ! I am so far from an intention of persecution, as 1 protest to God I reverence their Church as our Mother Church, thougli clogged with many corruptions." 2 Whilst James was on his journey south Garnet wrote : " The 5o8 TREASON AND PLOT ceived. There was to be no concession either to Catholics or Puritans from a King who had pro- fessed at different times to belong to both creeds ; and the Catholics now, doubtless aware too late of the tardy decision of the Spanish King, were doubly chagrined to find how they had been betrayed. That the Bye and Main Plots, and even the Gunpowder Conspiracy, were the rank, sporadic aftergrowth of the greater plan which Spanish pro- crastination prevented from ripening in time, may be accepted as certain. It is more than doubtful if the sum of money offered by Count Arenberg, the Archduke's ambassador, to Cobham and Ealegh after James's accession was intended to promote revolution or regicide ; it was far more likely to have been employed to obtain better terms for Spain and the Catholics in the coming treaty of peace. The Spaniards and Jesuits must have seen now that they had failed in conspiracy, as they had failed in invasion ; the archpriest Blackwell, Jesuit nominee though he was, was as anxious to denounce the dis- loyal plots of secular priests like Watson,^ as was the notorious Jesuit-hater Father Cecil himself, and a cause thus divided and subdivided against itself could not hope to prevail. The 100,000 ducats lent by Spinola, and the knowledge of the decision of Spain to have aided an English Catholic candidate, Catholics have great cause to hope for great respect ; in that the nobility, almost all, labour for it, and have good promise thereof from his Majesty." * The action of the Jesuit party in divulging the Bye Plot to Cecil, partly, no doubt, owing to tlie bitter feud between the two sections of Catholics, may also have been inspired by the knowledge that the aim of the conspirators was toleration. PROTESTANTISM TRIUMPHANT 509 still drove a few ambitious hot-heads to dream that they could turn back the hands of the clock and undo what had been done. But it was too late. Toleration perhaps might still have been wrung from James by formidable united pressure from without and within ; but the battle of Catholic supremacy in England was finally lost when Robert Cecil secretly rallied to James, and when the sloth- ful Spanish King and Lerma wasted two years in making up their minds finally as to their policy towards the section of English Catholics that had for so long looked to Spain for help and guidance. Even if the Gunpowder Plot had destroyed the King and his house, a Catholic sovereign of Eng- land under Spanish tutelage would no longer have been possible. James might cringe and truckle before Gondomar and his master until good Eng- lishmen blushed for shame at their sovereign's base- ness ; his son might dance attendance on a Philip, and endure the insolence of Olivares in the hope of being honoured with a Spanish bride, but no Eng- lish prince dared now adopt Catholicism as the ex- clusive religion of his country, or attempt once more to submit England to the yoke of the Papacy : for out of the forty years of struggle a potent empire had emerged, determined to choose its own form of faith, and able successfully to resist all dictation from the foreigner, even though its degenerate sovereign had forgotten the dignified traditions of Elizabeth. INDEX Adelantado, the (Don Martin de Padilla), 217, 227-229, 247, 249-263, 288, 290, 366, 369, 378, 407, 466, 476 Aguila, Don Juan del, Spanish commander at Kinsale, 453- 470 Albert, Archduke, 259, 278, 281, 302, 330-33 1 > 367, 402, 403, 423, 425, 479-480, 483 Allen, Cardinal, 11, 82, 87, 90, 95, 215 Almond, Priest, 91 Andrada, Manuel, 121-122, 124- 125, 126, 128-130, 137, 162-164 Angus, Earl of, 24, 27, 48, 65, 205 Annias' confessions, 103-104, 109, 115 Antonio, Don, Portuguese pre- tender, 109, 118 pasaiTn Arabella Stuart, 211, 215, 274- 281, 302,417, 496-504, 505 Archer, Father, 107, 471 Archpriest controversy, 85, 272- 273, 314-315, 327,421 Arenberg, Count, 508 Argyll, Earl of, 67-69, 313 Armada, Political effects of its defeat, 1-17 Armagh, Archbishop of. See M'Gavran battle of, 306-309 Arundel, Sir Thomas, 319 Bacon, Anthony, 143, 194 Francis, 35, 337, 396 Bagenal, Sir Henry, defeat at Armagh, 306-309 Bagshaw, Dr., 272, 315, 323-325, 416 Balgarys, Walter Lindsay, Lord, 26, 31, 69-74, 78-79, 201-203, 210-21 1 Baltimore, Spaniards at, 455, 461, 462, 468, 470 Baltinglas, Viscount, 56, 60, 63 Barclay, Hugh, sent to Spain, 69, 202-203, - 1 1 Barnes, 276, 283 Beauchamp, Lord, 257, 274, 279, 498, 500, 503, 504 Bethune, Maxmilian (Due de Sully), in Scotland, 381 Bingham, Sir Richard, 54, 230, 231, 333 Bisley, priest, 97 Jjlaclv, Scottish minister. 205 Blackwell, Archpriest of England, 273, 314,421, 422, 508 Blanks, the Spanish, 27 Blount, Sir Christopher, 343, 393 Bluet, Father, 273, 416 Botello, Diego, 128 Boulogne. See Peace negotiations Botliwell, Earl of (Francis Stuart), 64-65, 77, 78, 387; his plans for invading Scotland, 417-420, 49c Borough, Lord, Lord-Deputy, 265, 266, 267 Boyd, Charles, his mission to Spain, 25-26 512 INDEX Briminghani, Tyrone's secretary, sent to Spain, 302 Brochero, Admiral Don Diego, 453-455 Brounker, Sir Henry, 499-501 Bruce, Edward, Abbot of Kinloss, 364, 388, 440, 505, 506 Robert, of Bemie, 27, 42, 310 Buckhurst, Lord, 336, 413, 423, 431 Bull of excommunication, 84-85 Burghley, Lord, 18, 28, 32, 33, 37, 40, 61, 83-84, 89,1 28-130, 193, 282-283, 292, 297, 336 Lord, Thomas Cecil, 431, 434, 505 Burke, Redmond, 465 William, in Dunboy, 47 1 Button, Captain, 459 Bye and Main Plots, 508 Cadiz, the attack on, 194-200, 216, 220 Cahill's confessions, 106-109, no, 112 Calais, capture of, by the Spaniards, 192, 244, 284 Caldeira, 136 Campion, Father, 1 1 Caracena, Count, 472 Carew, Sir George, President of Muneter, 336, 431, 444, 45^-454, 454-469, 475 Cary, Robert, 506 Castlehaven, Spaniards in, 461- 462, 463, 464, 468, 470 Catholics in England, 80 et seq., 242-243,271-274, 276-281,315, 411, 427-428, 479-480, 483, 489 Cavendish, Henry, 498, 499, 502 William, 498, 499 Cecil, Father John, 41-49,61, 64- 65, 66, 69-74, 93, 201-203, 210- 216, 280, 281, 363, 508 Cecil, Sir Robert, 32-33, 35, 142- 143, 232, 244, 250, 281, 284, 292, 315. 359-364, 367-369, 375, 381, 390, 395, 413, 423, 431, 436; his understanding with James VI., 439-443, 491 ; his betrayal of his party, 492-494, 504-506, 509 Cerda, Martin de la, Spanish captain in Ireland, 400-402, 404, 407, 446, 449, 464, 467 Chamberlain, Father, Tyrone's confessor, 447 Chateau Martin, spy, 37-38, 40, 61,66 Chisholm, Bishop of Dunblane, 45 — Bishop of Vaison, 45, 419, 420 Cisneros, captain in Ireland, 183- 187 Claimants to the English succes- sion, 32, 166, 204, 211, 215, 221, 274-281, 411-417,478-480,483, 485, 486, 495-504 Clement VIII., Pope, 201-203, 214 Clifford, Sir Conyers, 351 Cobham, Lord, 292, 347, 365, 413, 432, 492, 493, 508 Cobos, Alonso, in Ireland, 182, 230-238, 266-267, 400 Coke, Speaker (Attorney-General), 34, 324 Collen's confessions, 103-109 Constable, English Catholic refu- gee, 284, 380, 420 Creighton, Scottish Jesuit, 420 Cresswell, Father Joseph, Jesuit, 224-225, 318-319, 382, 411-417, 478, 482, 484, 488, 494 Cumberland, Earl of, 274, 292, 294, 295, 374, 496 Curlews, Battle of, 351 Dacre, Lord, 44, 285 INDEX 513 Daniel's disclosures. 106-109 Dan vers, Sir Charles, 395, 431 Derby, Earl of, approached by the Catholics, ro2, 108, 274, 414, 417, 496 Derrick, Francis, 275-276 Desmond, Earl of (James Eiiz- thomas), 334, 397, 399, 409, 444, 448,451,457 John of, 448 Docwra, Sir Richard, 445, 452 Donegal, rebels meet in, 54-184, 193, 232-238, 399-402, 404, 446 Donnell, Spainagh (Kavanagh), 352 Douai, seminary at, 11, 82, 83 Drake, Sir Francis, 5-6, 18, 37-39, 47, 1 69-1 7 1 ; last voyage, 172- 174, 196 Drummond, James, Scottish en- voy to the Pope, 419 Dunblane, Bishop of. See Chis- holm Dunboy, Spaniards in, 461-462, 468-470 ; captured by O'Sulli- van, 471-473 Dynastic parties in England, 361, 411-417,421-422,427-428,431- 437, 485-487, 491 passim Edmunds, Sir Thomas, 423-424 Egerton, Lord Keeper, 336, 338 Elizabeth, her attitude towards the Catholics, 10, 17, 26, ^2, 35, 81-85 her death, 504-506 her letters to James VI., 29, 48, 66, 68, 205, 203 Elizabeth's attitude towards Spain, 18, 20-21, 35, 191, 193, 194, 282, 297 anger with Essex for his con- duct in Ireland, 350-360, 391- 396, 429-430 Elliot, Captain, 257, 279, 318 Elphinstone, Secretary, 420 Engletield, Sir Francis, 87, 219, 222, 225 English Catholics against Spain and the Jesuits, 14, 45, 86, 1 13- 114, 165, 204, 209, 215, 218, 243, 271, 284-287, 314-315, 325-327, 410, 420-421, 483 Errol, Earl of, 24, 27, 48, 65, 75, 205, 279-281 Essex, Earl of, 32, 89, 108, 109, 113, 131-132, 142-143, 161, 194-200, 244-250, 297, 302, 317-325 ; goes to Ireland, 332, 333, 337-357 ; return and dis- grace, 357-360, 389, 391, 392- 397, 400, 416, 420-421, 428 ; his rebellion, 429-437 Eustace, Captain, 54, 104, 115 Falmouth, plan to betray, 257, 259, 293, 316 Faux, English recusant, 99 Feagh, M'Hugh O'Byrne, 63, 230, 231, 241 Fenton, Sir Geoflfrey, 239, 241, 265, 298, 398, 445, 447 Fentry, Graham of, 26, 29 Feria, Duchess of, 45, 87, 225 Fernihurst, Ker of, sent to Madrid, 490 Ferreira da Gama, 132-152 Fitzgerald, Sir Maurice, 57, 58, 60, 63, 402 James Fitzmaurice, 52, 57, 60, 63 Fitzherbert, Nicholas, 218 Thomas, 317, 318, 319, 320 ; his report on English and Scottish aflfairs, 383-388, 410 Fitzmaurice, Thomas, in Dunboy, 471 Fixer, Father, 41,91 2 K 514 INDEX Fuentes, Count de, 138, 149, 152, 160, 366 Garnet, Dr.. Jesuit, 1 1 i-i 1 2, 422, 480, 507 Geraldines, the, 51-52, 56-57, 60, 63, 402 Gifford, Dr., 154, 156, 158, 159, 160, 166, 204, 209, 215, 218 Glenlivat, battle of, 67-68 Godolphin, Sir Francis, 171, 293 Sir William, 468 Gomez d'Avila, 1 33-1 41 Gordon, Father, 69, 280, 310 Gorges, Sir Ferdinando, 316, 431, 432 Grey de Wilton, Lord, 358, 413 Harrington, Sir John, 348, 391, 397 Harvey, Captain, commands at Castlehaven, 470 Haydon, Joseph, priest, 218 Heighington, English Catholic refugee, 87 Henry IV. of France, 15-16, 25, 166, 169, 191, 211, 281, 282, 292, 297, 488 Herrys, Lord, 78 Hertford, Earl of, 497-499, 500, 504 Hesketh, refugee, 14 ; sent to England, 102, 108, 218, 274 Holt, Father, 46, 87, loi, 104, 105, 106, 107, 154, 155, 157, 159, 161, 165, 207, 215, 225, 287 Howard, Lord Admiral, 195-198, 246, 250, 292, 375 ; Earl of Nottingham, 376, 413, 423, 431 Lord Henry, 429, 441, 493, 496, 505 Lord Thomas, 197, 246, 247, 292, 374 Hungerford, Lady, 225 Hunsdon, Lord, 423 Huntingdon, Earl of, 496 Huntly, Earl of, 23-24, 27, 29, 31, 41, 64, 65, 75, 76, 78-79, 204, 210, 212 Hume, Lord, Scottish Catholic, 65, 380 Ibarra, Esteban de, 105, 112, 115, 134, 149, 152, 158, 160, 208, 216,253, 450 Idiaquez, Secretary, 44-45, 58, 60, 218, 318, 405 Infanta, the, 166, 225, 259, 277, 278, 367, 382, 411, 478-479, 483, 485, 496 Invasion, fears of, in England, 35, 37-39, 62, 169-174, 194, 204, 242, 244-250, 291-293, 328, 369-378 Ireland, reports on the condition of, 63, 186, 401, 404, 409, 449 Irish rebellions, 50-64, 174-186, 193, 229-241, 263-270, 298- 309. 332-335, 344-356, 397- 410, 443-477 James VI., his claims to the Eng- lish succession, 40-47, 49, 66- 79, 201, 204-216, 273, 281, 285, 312, 363, 364-365, 366, 389, 419-420, 431, 437, 439-443, 486, 491, 504-509 his Catholic intrigues, 23- 32, 40, 45, 48, 49, 64, 65, 66, 76-79, 203-216, 302, 310-314, 364-366, 379-390, 410, 419-420, 486, 507 his correspondence with Elizabeth, 31, 75, 205, 303 his correspondence with Cecil, 441 ^^assim INDEX 515 James, Thomas, his mission to Spain, 478 et seq., 489 Jaques Francis, Captain, 46, loi- 103, 104, 106 Jesuits join the English mission, 11-13,26,85 Jesuit policy towards England, 11, 13, 41-46, 85-88,90-112, 165, 213, 217-225, 271-274, 284- 287, 314, 323-327, 365. 366, 410-416, 420-422, 427-428, 478, 482-483, 494, 496 Kelly, James, Irish rebel, 263- 264 Ker, George, 27-28, 43, 311-312, 481 Killaloe, Bishop of. See O'Neil. Killibegs, 230, 231, 239, 265-474 Killigrew, 257, 259, 293, 316 Kinsale, Spanish occupation of, 454-469 siege of, 457-469 Knollys, Sir William, 336, 436 Ladtland, Laird of, 7^, 74, 201- 203 Lalley, Thomas, mission to Spain, 263, 302 Lea, Captain, his plot to rescue Essex, 435 Leveson, Admiral Sir Eichard, 451, 460, 462 Lewis, Owen, Bishop of Cassano, M, 45. 95> 116, 167, 204, 220, 225 Lingen, Catholic, arrested, iio- III Lopez, Dr., conspiracy, 11 5-1 53 ; his antecedents, 117; pro- posal to poison Don Antonio, 119; communication with the Spaniards, 120 ; agent for Wal- singham, 123; arrest, 142; par- tial confession, 149 ; trial and execution, 149-157, 162 Lopez de Soto, 250 2>assim, 288, 289, 470 M'Carty More, 397, 399, 444, 45 1, 457 MacDermot, 241 M'Donnell (James Oge M'Sorley- boy), 236 M'Gavran, Archbishop of Armagh, 54 Macguire of Fermanagh, 53, 59, 174, 180, 182 Maclean, Sir John, 313 M'Mahon of Monaghan, 53, 404 M'Suyne, 182, 233, 239 M'William Bourke, 183, 230, 233, 235, 241, 264, 446 Maisse, De, French envoy, 282- 283 Mar, Earl of, envoy to England, 431-432, 439 Markham, Sir Griffin, 1 56 Marques Rodrigo, 121, 124-125- 126, 162 Medinilla, Captain, in Ireland, 183-187 Mendoza, Bernardino de, 23 Middletoii, Captain R. W., 154 Montjoy, Lord, Lord-Deputy, 332, 337, 389, 394-395» 398, 430, 435, 443-445,448-452,454; at Kin- sale, 458-469 Moody, 88 Morgan, Thomas, 14, 45 Morton, Dr., 87 Mostyn, Hugh, 446, 465 Moura, Cristobal de. Secretary, 61 125, 129, 139, 148, 162, 217, 253 Mumford, Priest, 177 Munday, conspirator, 318, 324- 325 Mush, Father, 85, 273, 327 5i6 INDEX NoRRRTS, Sir Edward, 245 Sir John, 175, 177, 182, 232, 234, 239, 240, 265, 298 Northumberland, Earl of, 375, 493, 50s O'Connor, Sir Charles, 60 Don, 180, 231 Roe, 180 Sligo, 351,446 O'Conroy, Father Florence, 475- 476 O'Cullan, priest, confession of, 176 O'Davitt, Hugh Boy, 238, 316 O'Dogherty, 230, 233, 236 O'Donnell, Brian, priest, 178, 189 Hugh, 52-53, 55-57, 59, 174, 178, 179, 181, 182, 184, 186, 230- 238, 239, 240, 241, 263, 266,- 268, 299, 304, 316, 333, 345, 351, 379, 397, 398, 400, 404, 408-409, 444, 449, 457, 458, 461-462 ; defeat, 464-465 ; flight to Spain, 465- 466, 474 ; death, 475-476, 481 O'Driscoll, Sir Finnan, 461, 471, 473 O'Driscolls, the, 455, 461, 470, 471, 473, 476 O'Ferrall, 180 O'Flaherty, 180 Ogilvie, Laird of Pury, 27 ; his mission, 203-216, 290 O'Healy, Archbishop of Tuam, his mission to Spain, 54, 64, 174 O'Kelly, 180 Olivares, Count, 483, 486, 487 O'Malley, 180 O'More, 180 O'Neil, The. See Tyrone Cormack, 233, 239, 241 Cornelius, Bishop of Killaloe, 54,57-58,175-176,178,226,318 O'Neil, Henry, son of Tyrone, 402 John, son of Tyrone, 402-476 Macwilliam, 233 O'Reilly, 179 Ormonde, Earl of, 269, 299, 305, 398 O'Rourke, Brian, senior, 53, 59-60 Brian, 53, 59, 174, 178, 179, 180, 181, 183, 233, 241, 268, 446, 448, 473 O'Sullevan, Philippus, 463, 472 O'Sullivan Beare, 457, 461, 462, 470, 471-473 Sir Owen, 457 Oviedo, Mateo de, Spanish Arch- bishop of Dublin, 400-402,416, 447, 449, 456 Owen, Hugh, 87, 97, loi, 106, 107, 109, 159, 207, 218 Richard, envoy of Tyi'one, 408, 446 Paez de Clavijo, Spanish cap- tain of Rincorran, 460 Pagets, the, 14, 95, 158, 159, 160, 166, 209, 215, 218, 283, 284, 330, 363 Parker, Sir Nicholas, 293 Parliament of 1 593, 33 et seq. Parma, Duke of (Ranuccio), 276- 277, 485 Parry, Dr., 88 Parsons, Robert. See Persons Peace negotiations with Spain, 423-428 Pembroke, Earl of, 375 Perez, Antonio, 89, 104-105, 106, 109, 131, 152, 169 Persons (or Parsons), Father Robert, 11, 13, 41-46, 85, 91, 95, III, 165, 167, 204, 214-216, 217-225, 273, 287, 290, 314, 327, 382, 411-417,420,428,478-479, 484, 488, 497 INDEX 517 Persons, Father, hisbook on thesuc- cession, 32, 166, 204, 221, 411 Pew, conspirator, 154 Phellips, Thomas, spy-master, 96, 97 Philip II., his policy towards England, 6-10, 14-16, 1S-19, 23, 162-165, 168, 199, 217, 258, 259. 273. 301. 330 his attitude towards the Scots Catholics, 36, 40-47, 49, 66-79, 201-216 his action in Ireland, 50-51, 60-61, 64, 171-176, 177-186 III., 366, 367, 403, 405-407, 465, 478, 481, 485, 490 Pierce, Dr., English refugee, 218, 220 Plots to assassinate Elizabeth, 88, 90-96, 97, 112, 115-152, 153- 164, 317-325 Political parties in England {i.e. Cecil and Essex), 32-35, 37, 61, 89-90, 113, 131, 142-143. 161, 169, 195, 243-244, 278, 279, 281, 293. 297, 302, 310-31 1. 317-325. 359-364, 375-377, 394-395; 421, 431 passim, 491, 508-509 Polwhele's confessions, 101-106, 109 Porres, Spaniard, sent to Scotland, 47-48, 49, 64, 65, 66, 73-74 Portalegi-e, Count, fears of an Eng- lish attack, 188, 193 Presbyterians in Scotland, 26, 65, 75, 203-205 Puckering, Lord Keeper, 33, 34, 99-100 Puritans, the, 10, 18, 33, 37, 311, 382 Kalegh, Sir W., 20, 36-37, 195- 198, 243, 245, 246-247, 248, 249, 292, 317, 342, 347, 360, 365, 374, 396, 413, 424, 431-432, 492-493, 507, 508 Randall, William. 46-48 Raphoe, Bishop of, 233 Rtivcnge, the, 21, 197 Rincorran, Castle of. See Kinsalo. River.=?, Father, 497, 502 Rolls, his plot to murder Eliza- beth, 319-325 Rome, English College at, 11, 85, 411 Russell, Lord-Deputy, 175, 177, 182, 231, 232, 239,240,265 Saavedra, Captain, commands Dunboy, 471 Scottish Catholics, 14, 23-33, 3^, 40-48, 64-66, 67-69, 70-79, 171, 20 1 -204, 205-2 1 6, 3 1 0-3 1 4, 4 1 7- 420, 481, 490 rebels, 67-69-79, 417, 490 Secular priests, English, 14, 85, ^ 271-273, 314-315, 324-327 Seminary priests, 1 1, 26, 41, 47-82, 85, 86,' 88-96 Semple, Colonel, 32, 76, 382, 467 Lord, Scottish envoy to Spain, 383, 388, 410 Matthew, sent to Spain, 76- 79, 201 Sessa, Duke of, 201-202, 210-214, 41 1-4 1 3, 420,421,479,488 Sherwood, Father, loi, 102, 106, 277 Shrewsbury, Countess of, 277, 502 Dowager Countess of, 275, 277, 498, 502, 503, 504 Earl of, 375, 498, 502 Sidney, Sir Robert, 245 Slatimor, J., sent to Ireland, 63 Smyth, Sheriff of London, 432-434 Southampton, Earl of, 340, 343, 347, 393-395, 431 ; his trial, 435-437 5i8 INDEX Spain, real source of its power, 1-3; exhaustion of, 5, 6, 62, 170- 171, 189, 193-200, 250-254, 263, 295, 33h 379, 408, 483 Spaniards land in Cornwall, 171 Spanish expeditions to Ireland, 182, 183-184,227-229,230-238, 266, 346, 379, 400-410, 445, 450-477 plans of invasion, 37-39, 42, 217, 220-229, 245. 250-263, 288-296, 316,370-378,383-390, 403-409, 453-469, 487 navy, efforts to renew, 20, 22, 36, 250-256 Spinola, Ambrosio, to lend money to attack England, 489 Squire, his plot to murder Eliza- beth, 319-325 Staftbrd, 88 Stanley, John, conspirator, 317- 325 Sir W., 37, 44, 46, 54, 87, 88, 97, loi, 102, 109, 154-155, 158, 218, 274, 275, 382, 408 Stapleton, 502 Dr., 167, 219, 220 Starkey, Arabella Stuart's chap- lain, 498, 501 Sterrel, spy, 97, 103, 221, 275, 276 Stillington, Dr., 87 Stuart, Patrick, Scottish envoy to the Pope, 419 Throgmohton, Thomas, 158-159, 204 Tichborne, Henry, his Jesuit treatise, 287 Tinoco (Manuel Luis), 134-135, 138, 152 Treherne, English refugee, 218 Trentine Decrees, 10 Treshani, Captain, 14, 159, 218, 363 Tyrie, Father, Jesuit, 213 Tyrone, Earl of, 52, 61, 170, 174 ; passion, 230-238, 239, 240, 263- 270, 298-309, 313-314, 316, 333, 344-356, 366, 379, 389, 392, 393, 397, 398, 400-410, 444-449, 457, 458, 464 ; defeat at Kinsale, 465- 473, 474, 475, 476 Tyrrell, Captain, in Dunboy, 471 Tuam, Archbishop of. See O'Healy Udal, Ralph, priest, 327 Unton, Sir H., mission to France, 191 Vaison, Bishop of. See Chisholm Valdes, Don Pedro de, 39 Valladolid, English College at, 41, 47, 87,411 Vere, Sir Francis, 197, 244, 246, 374 Verreyken, Flemish peace envoy, 423 Vervins, peace of, 297 Walpole, Father Henry, loi, 107; his arrest and confession, iio- 112 Father Richard, alleged com- plicity in murder plot, 317-325 Warford, priest, 91 Watson, Father, 315, 363, 411, 508 Webster, English recusant, con- fessions of, 97-99 Westmorland, Earl of, 44, 285 Weston, Father, 272, 314, 325 White Knight, the, 332, 451 Wight, Isle of, to be ceded to Spain, 488 Williams, Richard, conspiracy of, 154-161 Wilmot, Sir Charles, 454 INDEX 519 Wisbech Castle, 86, 166, 314, 323, 325 Stirs, 272 "Wood, James, of Bonnington, Papal envoy to Scotland, 380 Worcester, Earl of, 275, 375. 414, 485. 495 Worthington, Dr., 154, 158, 159, 160, 218, 220 YoRKE, Edmund, conspiracy of, 153-161 Young, Father (Dingley), con- fessions of, 90-96 Henry, conspirator, 1 54-161 ZuBlAUR, Pedro de (Admiral), 453-454, 460, 461, 462, 463, 465 Zuniga, Spanish ambassador, 425- 427, 485 THE END Printed by Ballanttne, Hakbon ct^ Co. Edinburgh &' London James O^sbet ^ Qo's Spring List of Tublications a~~' kXD ^ Clt- ' ''^ B- Treason and Plot. Struggles for Catholic Supremacy in the Last Years of Elizabeth By Martin A. S. Hume, Author of "The Great Lord Burghley," " The Courtships of Queen Elizabeth," &c. Demy 8vo, i6s. Bolingbroke. a Study and a Vindication By Walter Sichel, late Exhibitioner of Balliol College, Oxford. With Portraits. Demy 8vo, 1 2s. 6d. net. Italy To-day. a Study of her Politics, her Position, her Society, and her Letters By Bolton King, Author of "A History of Italian Unity," and W. Okey. With Maps. Demy 8vo, I2S. net. The Social Problem. Work and Life By J. A. HoBSON, Author of "John Ruskin, Social Reformer," " Problems of Poverty," &c. Demy 8vo, 7$. 6d. net. Vengeance as a Policy in Afri- kanderland. a Plea for a New Departure By Francis J. Dormer, sometime Editor of the Cape Argus and Johannesburg Star. Demy 8vo, 6s. The Story of the Life of Queen Victoria By W. W. TuLLOCH. Revised by the late Queen. A new Edition with Postscript. Crown 8vo, 2s. 6d. The Life of F. W. Crossley By J. Rendel Harris. Fully Illustrated. New and Cheap Edition. Extra crown 8vo, 2s, 6d. Sermon Seed. Fifty-two Studies for Sermons By the Rev. R. Tuck, Author of "The Hour before Holy Communion," &c. Crown Svo, 6s. Family Prayers for Four Weeks By the Author of " Daily Prayers for Busy Homes." Extra crown Svo, 2s. 6d. Working for God By the Rev. Andrew Murray. A Sequel to "Waiting on God." Pott Svo, is. net. The Evangelical School in the Church of England. Its Men and its Work in the Nineteenth Century By the Rev. H. C G. Moule, D.D. A New Volume in Nisbet's Church of England Handbooks. Small crown 8vo, 2s, Alone in Africa. a Lady's Experiences By Madame Gov. Small crown 8vo, is. "^cently T^ublished The History of the Romeward Movement in the Church of England, 1833-1864 By Walter Walsh, Author of "The Secret History of the Oxford Movement." Demy 8vo, los. 6d. net. " A valuable addition to the literature on the subject of which it treats." — Liverpool Courier. " One of the most powerful indictments of the Ritualistic move- ment yet presented. An absolutely irresistible volume of evidence." — Record. Abra of PoictierS. A Story of the Days of St. Hilary By M. E. Ames. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d. "A most touching and interesting story." — Liverpool Courier. " A pleasant and gracefully written story. . . . The interest is sustained to the end." — The Neivs. r . Cj. 1 a.lt. A Record. Being his Life, Letters, and Golfing Diary By J. L. Low. Profusely Illustrated and with Photogravure Frontispiece. Large crown 8vo, 6s. "Mr. Low's record of Tail's life is no unworthy monument to the gallant young soldier who fell at Koodoosberg." — Pall Mall Gazette. " Altogether, this life is a bit of breezy manhood that does one good to meet with." — Haddington Courier. Thy Will be Done By the Rev. Andrew Murray, Author of "Abide in Christ," &c. Small crown 8vo, 2S. 6d. " Characterised by the devout spirit and whole-hearted consecra- tion to God which ever mark Mr. Murray's utterances." — The Record. How we got our Prayer Book By the Rev. T. W. Drury, B.D. Small crown 8vo, 2S. The Church Directory and Almanack for 1901 28. net ; in cloth, 3s. net " A wonderful book. ... at a wonderful price." — The News. " An indispensable book in all houses of business as well as in the homes of the Clergy and Laity of the Church of England." — The British Weekly. JAMES NISBET ^ CO., LIMITED 21 BERNERS STREET, LONDON, W. DATE DUE UC SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY """""""" ■■■|l||lllll!l ""III AA 001330 976 3 1210 00079 5953 <^^