Ex Idbris C. K. OGDEN SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN HIS FAMILY AND HIS TIMES, WITH ORIGINAL LETTERS AND A DISCOURSE ON ARCHITECTURE HITHERTO UNPUBLISHED. 15851723. BY LUCY PHILLIMORE, AUTHOR OF 'BISHOP WILBKRFORCE, A SKETCH FOR CHILDREN' ETC. The modest man built the city, and the modest man's skill was unknown." The Tatler, No. 52. WITH TWO ENGRAVINGS. LONDON: KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, & CO., i PATERNOSTER SQUARE. 1881. (The rights of translation and of reproduction are reserved) LIBRARY ERSITY OF CA SANTA BARBARA UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA TO CATHERINE PIGOTT, THE LAST DIRECT DESCENDANT OF SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN, THESE MEMOIRS OF HER ANCESTORS ARE GRATEFULLY DEDICATED. PREFACE. THE materials necessary for writing a life of Sir Chris- topher Wren are so difficult of access as possibly to explain the unsatisfactory character of such biographies as do exist. Mr. James Elmes, who venerated Wren's genius, published in 1823, a Life which contained a care- ful if a dry account of Wren's architectural works and of some of his scientific discoveries. He also published a smaller work, ' Sir C. Wren and his Times,' intended perhaps to give a flavour of personal interest to the other volume. Neither book succeeds in doing this, and both have suffered from the circumstance that Mr. Elmes' failing eyesight did not permit him to correct the proofs of either work, and accordingly many serious errors as to names and dates stand unaltered in them. There is a sketch of Wren in the British Family Library, one published by the Society for the Dif- fusion of Useful Knowledge, and one in the ' Bio- graphica Britannica/ but in them all it is with some of the works of the great architect that we become acquainted, not with himself. The chief authority to which any biographer of viii PREFACE. Wren must perforce turn is, the ' Parentalia, or Memoirs of the Family of the Wrens : viz., of Matthew, Bishop of Ely ; Christopher, Dean of Windsor and Registrar of the Garter ; but chiefly of Sir Christopher Wren.' This work, a folio, with portraits 1 of the three whose lives it records, was published in London in 1750, dedicated to Mr. Speaker Onslow. It was chiefly written by Christopher, the eldest surviving son of Sir Christopher Wren, finished and finally published by Stephen Wren, M.D., the second and favourite, son of the Mr. C. Wren above mentioned, ' with care of Joseph Ames,' a fellow of the Society of Antiquaries. Several copies were presented to the University of Oxford. The ' Parentalia/ of which but a small edition was published, is now scarce and little known. It is put together, not quite at hap-hazard, but with no real method or order : digression ensues upon digression until all clue to the original date or subject is lost. N or is the very imperfect ' index of names ' of any real assistance in the labyrinth thus created. Yet, with all its faults, the book is of great interest, and bears amidst all errors and omissions an unmistakably genuine stamp. ' Bishop Wren's Diary/ reference to which will be frequently found in the following pages, was kept by him in the blank leaves of ' Pond's Almanack/ after this fashion : ' August 30. Per vim hostilem eripior domo med. 1642.' 1 From which the three vignettes in this volume are taken. PREFACE. ix These entries cease with the death of his wife in 1646 ; even his own release from prison is not mentioned. The old heirloom copy of the ' Parentalia ' intrusted to the writer of these pages contains a large additional number of prints and wood engravings by Virtue, Vandergucht, Loggan, and others, some printed ac- counts of the City Churches, and several letters, rough drafts of treatises, Garter records, and other MSS. in the handwritings of the Bishop, the Dean, Sir Chris- topher himself, and of some of their correspondents. Among the curious omissions of the ' Parentalia ' are the maiden name of Bishop Wren's wife, the date of the death of Sir Christopher's mother, Mrs. Mary Wren, and the places and the dates at which either of Sir Christopher's two weddings took place. Some of these and other gaps I have, by the aid of ' Notes and Queries,' been able to supply. Wren's son and grand- son are both alike silent on all political matters sub- sequent to the Restoration. The Popish Plot, the Trial of the Seven Bishops, King James's Abdication, the Landing of William of Orange are all passed by in perfect silence. The traditional politics of the Wrens were certainly those of the loyal Cavalier party, and they were in favour at the Court of the Stuarts. It is curious how all political colouring disappears from the record after the period of the Restoration. Yet Sir Christopher, his cousins, and the very Mr. Wren who writes the book were all in Parliament, and x PREFACE. that in more or less critical times. Such accidental hints as there are point, I think, to Sir Christopher as adhering, though very quietly, to the politics of his ancestors ; and assuredly neither he nor his descendants had any cause to love the house of Hanover ! Wren was a steady Churchman, bred up in that school of Andrewes, of Laud, and of Matthew Wren, which, if it was anti- Puritan, was equally and emphati- cally anti- Roman. For this reason, if for no other, after the trial of the Seven Bishops had shaken the confi- dence of every Churchman in the country, Wren may have acquiesced in a settlement which appeared to promise protection to the Church without finally ex- cluding the Stuart line. The ' Parentalia/ published five years after the last Jacobite rising in 1745, pre- serves, as has been said, a political silence which may be that of discretion or of disappointment. One word should be said as to Gresham College, where Wren held his first professorship. It was foun- ded in 1579 by the will of Queen Elizabeth's great merchant Sir Thomas Gresham. The college was no other than his own house in Bishopsgate, forming a quadrangle round a large garden. The seven profes- sors, each of whom gave a lecture a day in term time, had a salary of 5O/. a year and were lodged in the house. Gresham College escaped the Fire, and gave lodgings at that time to the Lord Mayor and the alder- men, who had been less fortunate. In 1768 it was pulled down by Act of Parliament, to give a site to the PREFACE. xi new Excise Office, and the original collegiate scheme was destroyed, though the lectures are still given in a lecture hall. Little is known of Wren in his Masonic capacity. He is said to have been a member and a master of the ' Old Lodge of S. Paul,' now known as the ' Lodge of Antiquity.' All the records of the Lodge belong- ing to that time have unfortunately been lost, so that they cannot be consulted with reference to this matter. The question has been raised whether Wren was a Freemason or not. On this point the ' Parentalia ' makes no explicit statement, though it appears to imply Wren's connection with the Order. The Duke of Sussex caused a plate to be engraved in 1827 and affixed to the mallet which Sir Christo- pher was said to have presented to the Lodge, with this inscription: 'A. L. 5831. A.D. 1827. To com- memorate that this, being the same mallet with which His Majesty King Charles II. levelled the foundation stone of S. Paul's Cathedral, A. L. 5677, A.D. 1673. Was presented to the Old Lodge of S. Paul, now the Lodge of Antiquity, acting by immemorial constitution, by Brother Sir Christopher Wren, R.W.D.G.M., Worshipful Master of this Lodge and Architect of that Edifice.' The statement respecting King Charles's presence is probably an erroneous one. The Lodge possesses also three gilt wooden candlesticks in the form of xii PREFACE. columns, inscribed ' Ex dono Chr. Wren Eq. A. L. 5680.' Where quotations have been made directly from the Wren MS., from the ' Parentalia,' or from Evelyn's Diary, the spelling and stopping of the originals have been faithfully reproduced. For the rest, the writer can only hope that these pages may serve as a contribution towards that full and worthy biography of the great architect which may yet, she trusts, be written before London is finally robbed of the Churches with which Wren's genius endowed her. August i, 1881. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. 1585-1636. PAGB Ancestry of the Wrens Matthew Wren Travels to Spain with the Prince of Wales Interview at Winchester House Bishop Andrewes' Prophecy Wren made Master of Peterhouse Bishop of Hereford Consecration of Abbey Dore Office of Reconcilia- tion Foreign Congregations and the Norwich Weavers Result of ' a Lecturer's ' Departure 3 CHAPTER II. 1636-1640. Dr. C. Wren Birth of his Son Christopher East Knoyle Order of the Garter How a Murderer was Detected Christopher at Westminster A Latin Letter Diocese of Ely Impeachment of Lord Strafford Of Archbishop Laud Articles against Bishop Wren Resigns the Deanery of the Chapels Royal. . . .31 CHAPTER III. 1641-1647. Bishop Wren accused Westminster Abbey attacked Imprison- ment of the Bishops Bishop Wren's Defence ' Utterly Denieth all Popish Affections ' The Garter Jewels Archbishop Laud Murdered Christopher at Oxford Philosophical Meet- ings.. . .... . . 55 CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. 1647-1658. PAGE Death of Mrs. M. Wren King Charles Murdered A monotonous Walk Inventions A Dream All Souls' Fellowship Begin- nings of the Royal Society Astronomy An Offer of Release The Cycloid Cromwell's Funeral Letters from London. . 85 CHAPTER V. 1659-1663. Apostolical Succession Difficulty of preserving it Letters from Lord Clarendon Bishop Wren's Release The Restoration Con- vocation Savih'an Professorship Royal Society ' Elephant in the Moon' Pembroke Chapel begun 109 CHAPTER VI. 1664-1667. Repair of S. Paul's Sheldonian Theatre The Plague A Letter from Paris Consecration of Pembroke Chapel Fire of London Bishop Wren's Death His Family 139 CHAPTER VII. 1668-1672. Patching S. Paul's Sancroft's Letters Wren's Examination of S. Paul's Salisbury Cathedral London as it might have been Letter to Faith Coghill Wren marries her Temple Bar S. Mary-le-Bow Artillery Company Gunpowder used to remove Ruins 165 CHAPTER VIH. 1672-1677. Birth of his eldest Son S. Stephen's, Walbrook S. Bennet Fink Plans for S. Paul's The Excavations Son Christopher born Death of Faith, Lady Wren Second Marriage City Churches The Monument Tomb of Charles I. Remains of the little Princes in the Tower . . jo,r CONTENTS. xv CHAPTER IX. 1677-1681. PAGE Emmanuel College Greenwich Observatory Birth of Jane and William Wren S. Bartholomew's Portland Quarries Dr. and Mrs. Holder Death of Lady Wren Popish Plot Papin's " Digester Sir J. Hoskyns All Hallow's, Bread Street Palace at Winchester. 215 CHAPTER X. 1681-1686. Chelsea College S. James's, Westminster A hard Winter Chi- chester Spire An Astronomical Problem A Seat in Parliament More City Churches A curious Carving. ". ... . 239 CHAPTER XI. 1687-1696. Parliament dissolved Church building Acquittal of the Seven Bishops James the Second's Flight William and Mary College of Physicians Hampton Court Greenwich Hospital Richard Whittington S. Paul's Organ 259 CHAPTER XII. 1697-1699. Opening of S. Paul's Choir A moveable Pulpit Letter to his Son at Paris Order against Swearing Peter the Great S. Dunstan's Spire Morning Prayer Chapel opened Westminster Abbey. . 279 CHAPTER XIII. 1700-1708. Member for Weymouth Rising of the Sap in Trees Prince George's Statue Jane Wren's Death Thanksgiving at S. Paul's Letter to his Son Son marries Mary Musard Death of Mr. Evelyn Queen Anne's Act for Building fifty Churches Letter on Church Building 297 xvi CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIV. 1709-1723. PACK Private Houses built Queen Anne's Gifts Last Stone of S. Paul's Wren deprived of his Salary His Petition 'Frauds and Abuses ' Interior work of S. Paul's Wren Superseded Purchase of Wroxhall Abbey Wren's Thoughts on the Longitude His Death Burial in S. Paul's The End 317 APPENDIX. I. Reverendo Patri Domino Christophoro Wren S.T.D. et D. W. Christophorus Filius Hoc Suum Panorganum Astronomicum D.D. xiii. Calend. Novem. Anno 1645 337 1 1. Churches, Halls, Colleges, Palaces, other Public Buildings, and Private Houses built and repaired by Sir Christopher Wren. 338 III. A Discourse on Architecture, from Original MS. . . 340 INDEX 351 CHAPTER I. 1585-1636. ANCESTRY OF THE WRENS MATTHEW WREN TRAVELS TO SPAIN WITH THE PRINCE OF WALES INTERVIEW AT WINCHESTER HOUSE BISHOP ANDREWES' PROPHECY WREN MADE MASTER OF PETER- HOUSE BISHOP OF HEREFORD CONSECRATION OF ABBEY DORE OFFICE OF RECONCILIATION FOREIGN CONGREGATIONS AND THE NORWICH WEAVERS RESULT OF 'A LECTURER'S' DEPARTURE. Time, like an ever-rolling stream Bears all its sons away. CHAPTER I. THE name of Christopher Wren is no doubt familiar to the great majority of English people, and to Londoners especially ; but it is to many of them little more than a name with which is connected S. Paul's Cathedral and a now, alas ! diminished number of City churches. Yet the great architect's ninety-one years of life were passed among some of the most stirring times of our history, in which his family played no in- considerable part, and he himself was not only the best architect of his day, but was also the foremost in many other sciences. A singularly patient and far- seeing intellect aiding a strong religious faith enabled him ' to keep the even tenour of his way ' through a life of incessant labour and considerable temptation. It has been truly said, ' It seems almost like a defect in such a biography as that of Wren, that it presents nothing of that pictur- esque struggle, in the rise from a lower to a higher condition, which has so commonly attended the con- quest of genius over difficulty.' l Far otherwise, the Wren family was an old one, tracing its descent from the Danes ; one of the house 1 Warwickshire Worthies, p. 845. Article by C. Wren Hoskyns, Esq., M.P. B 2 CHRISTOPHER WREN. fought in Palestine under Richard I., and his fame long survived, as in Charles I.'s time it was quoted against one of the knight's descendants. In 1455, during the reign of Henry VI., in the Black Book (or register) of the Order of the Garter, mention is made of a Wren who probably belonged to this family : ' The Lord of Winchester, Prelate of the order, per- formed the Divine Service proper for S. George the Martyr, but the Abbots Towyrhill and Medmenham being absent, were not excused, in whose stead Sir William Stephyns read the gospel and Sir W. Marshal the epistle, both of them singing men of the king's choir. The dean of the same choir pre- sented the gospel to the sovereigne to be kissed, and the next day celebrated Mass for the deceased, Sir J. Andevere and John Wrenne assisting in the reading of the epistle and gospel. The reader of the gospel, after censing the reader of the epistle, reverently tendered the heart of S. George to the sovereigne and knights in order to be kissed.' The heart of S. George was presented by Sigis- mund, Emperor of Germany, on his admission to the Order of the Garter. The spelling of ' Wrenne ' was a very common form of the family name, and it seems very likely that John Wrenne belonged to this family, who were much connected with S. George's, Windsor. William Wren was in Henry VI I I.'s time the head of the family ; his younger brother Geoffrey, who was OLD FAMILY MOTTO. 5 a priest, was of Henry VI I. 's privy council, and was confessor both to him and to Henry VIII. He held the living of S. Margaret's, Fish Street, in the City of London, from 1512 till his death. 1 Geoffrey Wren was also a canon of S. George's at Windsor, where he founded the seventh stall. There he died in 1527, and was buried in the north aisle of the chapel under a brass bearing his effigy in the Garter mantle, with this inscription at his feet : ' Sub saxo ponor, et vermtbus ultimis donor, Et sicut ponor, ponitur omnis honor.' 2 This tomb and brass have disappeared, as has the ' South Lodge ' with its window displaying his coat of arms and emblem ; the latter, a wren holding a trefoil in its claw, and his motto ' Turbinibus superest coelo duce praescius.' Dean Wren explains this emblem as chosen because, ' the trefoil or clover shrinking before a storm foretold a change of weather,' and the wren was supposed to have the same prescience. Both motto and emblem were changed by the descendants of the family. William Wren's grandson, Francis, was born 1552, two years before the close of Queen Mary's reign, at Monk's Kirby in Warwickshire, where the family had property. He was a mercer and citizen of London, 1 S. Margaret's, standing close to Pudding Lane, where the Fire of London began in 1666, was the first church consumed. Its site is now occupied by the Monument, and the parish incorporated with that of S. Magnus the Martyr, London Bridge. 2 Laid under the stone, For the worms alone, All mortal pride Is laid aside. (G. A. D.) 6 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. and was steward to Mary Queen of Scots during her captivity in England. He married Susan, daughter of William Wiffinson ; they lived in the parish of S. Peter's Cheap, and had three children : a daughter Anna, and two sons ; Matthew, born 1585, and Christopher, born 1589. Both were educated at the Merchant Taylors' School, and there Matthew especi- ally attracted the notice of Lancelot Andrewes, then Dean of Westminster, who frequently came to the school where he had been bred, and examined the boys in various subjects, particularly in the Hebrew Psalter. He was struck by the proficiency of the eldest of the Wrens, and obtained for the boy a scholarship at Pembroke Hall, Cambridge, of which he was himself master. From that time Dr. Andrewes appears never to have lost sight of Wren, but to have guided his studies and fostered ' the most passionate affection for the ministry of the Church ' which the young man showed. Nor was Wren's university life undistinguished, for he became Greek scholar of his college, and when King James visited Cambridge, Matthew Wren, then in priest's orders, ' kept the Philosophy Act ' before him with great applause. The subject given was, 'Whether dogs were capable of syllogisms.' Old Fuller says of this extraordinary ' Act,' ' he kept it with no less praise to himself than pleasure to the king ; where if men should forget even dogs should remember his season- able distinction what the king's hounds could perform above others by virtue of their prerogative.' l Pro- 1 Bishop Andrewes was so well pleased that he ' sent the moderator MATTHEW WREN. 7 bably this speech and its ready wit remained on the mind of the King, who dearly loved a compliment to the royal prerogative, and determined him to favour Matthew Wren. Lancelot Andrewes, who had been Bishop of Chichester, was in 1609 translated to Ely, and so enabled to watch over the University and ' to search out,' as he entreated his friends to do also, ' hopeful and towardly young wits,' and train them up for Holy Orders. 1 He made Matthew Wren his chaplain, gave him the living of Feversham in Cambridgeshire, and some years later made him a canon of Winchester. But very different duties from the ordinary ones of a parish priest devolved upon Wren. King James planned for the Prince of Wales the famous ' Spanish match,' and gave a most reluctant consent to the Duke of Buckingham's scheme, that the Prince should him- self go to Spain to fetch home his bride. Two of his chaplains were to attend the Prince, and by the advice of Bishop Andrewes and of Laud, then Bishop of S. David's, Dr. Leonard Maw, afterwards Bishop of Bath and Wells, and Dr. Matthew Wren were chosen. The Prince and Buckingham departed hastily, leaving the chaplains and suite to follow as they could. King James had no sooner allowed the expedition than he repented of it, and being unable to recall his permis- sion, was tormented by a thousand fears for the Prince's safety. The nation was in a state of ferment, (Dr. Meade), the answerer (Mr. M. Wren), the varier, and one of the repliers that were all of his house (i.e. Pembroke), twenty angels apiece.' Life of Bishop Andrewes, Lib. Anglo-Catholic Theology, p. xxi. 1 Life of Bishop Andrewes, Lib. Anglo-Catholic Theology, p. xvii. 8 SfK CHRISTOPHER WREN. persuaded that the Prince's faith would be tampered with as well as his person endangered. Thus the two chaplains had by no means an enviable post. They went down to Newmarket, took their leave of the King and received his last instructions : ' So as all their behaviour and service should prove decent and agreeable to the purity of the Primitive Church, and yet so near the Roman form as can law- fully be done ; " for," said he, " it hath ever been my way to go with the Church of Rome usque adaras" ' 1 ' The two bishops gave them also written and detailed instructions that there might appear a face of the Church of England in all forms of worship ; that in the sermons there may be no polemical preach- ings to inveigh against the Romanists or to confute, but only to confirm the doctrine and tenets of the Church of England by all positive arguments either in fundamental or moral points.' A full list followed of vestments for the clergy, orna- ments and hangings for the altar, and altar lights, Latin service books, directions for a room to be adorned chapel- wise, and for frequent services, all to be read in Latin so that the Spaniards might comprehend them. All this careful provision seems to have been defeated by the fact of the Prince and his suite being lodged in the palace at Madrid, so that there was no public service, only bed-chamber prayers. Contemporary letters show that the chaplains' position was not an easy one, though the Prince remained steadfast, and in the congenial o 1 CyP r - Ang., p. 100. Heylin. RETURNS FROM SPAIN. g atmosphere of the dignified Spanish court became every day more gracious. ' Dr. Wren forbears,' says one of these letters, ' to write any particulars, but intimates all is not as it should be.' It was no doubt a necessary pre- caution on the chaplain's part to preserve this discreet silence, but it is tantalising to have only a hint con- cerning the transactions in Spain. How the negotia- tions -were delayed, how the King recalled the Prince and the marriage was broken off, are historical facts too well known to need repetition here. One result seems to have been a strong bond of affection between the Prince and those who went with him on this singular expedition. That his departure was attended with some sea- peril appears from one of Edmund Waller's 1 early poerns on ' the Danger which His Majesty, being Prince, escaped in the Road at S. Andero ' : ' Now had his Highness bid farewell to Spain, And reached the sphere of his own pow'r, the main ; With British bounty in his ship he feasts The Hesperian princes his amazed guests, To find that wat'ry wilderness exceed The entertainment of their great Madrid.' A description follows of the Prince being rowed in a barge to his own ship, a sudden storm arises in which there is a great difficulty in making the ship ; at length the Fates allow the rope to be successfully thrown, knowing it to be for England : 1 Edmund Waller, born March 3, 1605. He was connected by his marriage with Cromwell, and wrote one of his best poems as a panegyric on the Protector, but was supposed to be a Cavalier at heart and rejoiced at the Restoration ; died 1687. 10 SfA CHRISTOPHER WREN. ' Whose prince must be (as their own books devise) Lord of the scene where now his danger lies.' On October 8, 1623, Dr. Wren's diary records ' we landed at Portsmouth/ and his first and only journey out of Great Britain was over. The sea-voyage, probably a stormy one, made an impression on his mind and he preached before the Universities on the text ' One deep calleth to another.' This is said to have been a remarkable sermon, and old Fuller declares that he became an excellent preacher. The one sermon of his now extant, preached at a later date, on the text ' Fear God, honour the King,' shows that he modelled his style greatly on that of Bishop Andrewes, though without attaining to the same excellence. The sermon is a bold and outspoken one, and has its striking passages. King James, in testimony of his approval of Dr. Wren's conduct as his son's chaplain, bestowed on him the valuable living of Bingham, in Nottinghamshire, to which he was inducted during the next year, resigning his fellowship of Pem- broke and the living of Feversham. Previous to this event, and soon after the Prince's return, a singular incident occurred. Wren, who had been down to Cambridge, came up, as he says, ' sud- denly ' to London, and as it was late, lodged with his sister in Friday Street, instead of going to Winchester House, where the Bishop kept ' three rooms near the garden ' fitted and reserved for him, and where he had lodged twice or thrice. He had, however, seen the Bishop twice, also the Bishops of Durham and S. David's, had taken leave of them on a Saturday, and AT WINCHESTER HOUSE. it was prepared to return to Cambridge on the Monday morning following. His journey was, however, delayed by an event which shall be given in his own words: l 1 On Monday morne by break of the day there was a great knocking at the door where I lay. And at last the apprentice (who lay in the shop) came up to my bedside, and told me there was a messenger from Winchester House to speak with me. The business was to let me know, that my Lord, when he came from Court last night, had given his steward charge to order it so that I might be spoken with, and be required as from him without fail to dine with him on Monday ; but to be at Winchester House by ten of the clock, which I wondered the more at, his lordship not using to come from his study till near twelve. My businesse would hardly permit this, yet because of his lordship's importunity, I got up presently, and into Holborn I went, and there used such despatch, that soon after ten of the clock, I took a boat and went to Winchester House, where I found the steward at the water gate waiting to let me in the nearest way ; who told me that my lord had called twice to know if I were come. I asked where his lordship was ? He answered, in his great gallery (a place where I knew his lordship scarce 1 ' A transcript of a certain narrative written by the late Bishop of Ely (Dr. Matthew Wren) with his own hand, of that remarkable conference, which after his return from Spain with Prince Charles, 1636, he had with Dr. Neile, then Bishop of Durham, Dr. Andrewes, Bishop of Winchester, and Dr. Laud, Bishop of S. David's, touching the said Prince, whereat something prophetical was then said by that Reverend Bishop of Winchester.' Printed from a MS. in the Ashmolean Museum. Life of Bishop Andrewes, Lib. Anglo-Catholic Theology, p. Ivii. 12 SfX CHRISTOPHER WREN. came once in a year), and thither I going, the door was locked, but upon my lifting a latch, my lord of St. David's opened the door, and, letting me in, locked it again. ' There I found but those three Lords, who causing me to sit down by them, my Lord of Durham began to me : " Doctor, your Lord here will have it so, I that am the unfi ttest person must be the speaker. But thus it is. After you left us yesterday at White- hall, we entering into further discourses of those things which we foresee and conceive will ere long come to pass, resolve to again to speak to you before you went hence. ' " We must know of you, what your thoughts are concerning your master the Prince. You have now been his servant above two years, and you were with him in Spain. We know he respects you well ; and we know you are no fool, but can observe how things are like to go." " What things, my Lord ? " (quoth I). " In brief," said he, " how the Prince's heart stands to the Church of England, that when God brings him to the Crown we may know what to hope for." ' My reply was to this effect, that however I was most unfit of any opinion herein, attending but two months in the year and then at a great distance, only in the closet and at meals ; yet, seeing they so pressed me, I would speak my mind freely ; so I said, " I know my master's learning is not equal to his father's, yet I know his judgement to be very right ; and as for his affection in these particulars which BISHOP* ANDRE WES^ PROPHECY. 13 your Lordships have pointed at, for upholding the doctrine and discipline and right estate of the Church, I have more confidence of him than of his father, in whom they say (better than I can) is so much inconstancy in some particular cases." ' Hereupon my Lords of Durham and St. David's began to argue it with me, and required me to let them know upon what ground I came to think thus of the Prince. I gave them my reasons at large ; and after many replyings, (above an hour together,) then my Lord of Winchester (who had said nothing all the while) bespake me these words : ' " Well, Doctor, God send you may be a good prophet concerning your master's inclinations in these particulars, which we are glad to hear from you. I am sure I shall be a true prophet : I shall be in my grave, and so shall you, my Lord of Dur- ham ; but my Lord of St. David's and you, Doctor, will live to see that day that your master will be put to it, upon his head and his crown, without he will forsake the support of the Church." ' Of these predictions made by that holy father,' adds the writer, ' T have now no witness but mine own conscience and the Eternal God who knows I lie not ; nobody else being present when this was spoken but these three Lords.' After this the four friends separated and Wren returned to Cambridge. In two years from the time of that conference King James died, in the following year the saintly I 4 SJK CHRISTOPHER Bishop Andrewes, the kind and unfailing friend of both the Wrens, died also. It is to the great discredit of James I., and probably was the inconstancy to which Dr. Wren alluded, that, as has happened in our own day, the greatest Prelate, the ' incomparable preacher/ the truest and wisest champion of the Church, was passed over when the archbishopric was vacant, an inferior man put above him, and at last the see of Winchester offered to him in tardy amends. At Arch- bishop Bancroft's death in 1610, everyone's eyes had turned to Bishop Andrewes as his natural successor : but, in the words of a contemporary letter from Lord Baltimore (then Mr. Calvert) to Sir T. Edmonds, ' The Bishop of London (Abbot) by a strong north wind blowing out of Scotland is blown over the Thames to Lambeth ; the king having professed to the Bishop himself as also to all the Lords of this council that it is neither the respect of his learning, his wisdom nor his sincerity (although he is well per- suaded there is not any one of them wanting in him), that hath made him to prefer him above the rest of his fellows, but merely the recommendation of his faithful servant Dunbar that is dead, whose suit on behalf of this Bishop he cannot forget, nor will suffer to lose his intention.' l The consequences of such an ecclesiastical appoint- ment made for so insufficient a reason were disastrous indeed. Had Andrewes succeeded Bancroft, and had Laud succeeded Andrewes, ' the Church had been 1 Life of Bishop Andrewes, Lib. Anglo-Catholic Theology, p. x. MASTERSHIP OF PETERHOUSE. 15 settled on so sure a foundation that it had not easily been shaken.' l There was general lamentation when Andrewes died, and few can have mourned him more sincerely than Matthew Wren, whom he had loved as a son. Wren attended the funeral, received the gold ring which was the Bishop's bequest to him, and composed the Latin epitaph for his tomb in S. Saviour's, Southwark, which is no unworthy tribute to the holy Bishop. During this year Dr. Wren was elected, by the unanimous wish of the fellows, Master of Peterhouse, Cambridge, where he ' exercised such prudence and moderation in his government that he reduced all the fellows to one sacred bond of unity and concord.' Besides this he rebuilt the college in great part from the ground, and perceiving that the absence of a chapel was a great obstacle in the way of reverent and frequent services, he did not rest until he had raised subscrip- tions enough to build a handsome chapel, and to orna- ment it richly. 2 The wood-panelled hexagonal roof, the marble steps on which the altar stands, flanked by two tall candlesticks, give a character to the interior en- hanced by the east window, which is in part a copy of that famous picture of the Crucifixion, then just finished, by Rubens, at Antwerp. This window was carefully taken down in the Rebellion before the college was 1 Cypr. Ang., p. 59. Heylin. 2 Evelyn, who visited Cambridge in 1655, says of Peterhouse, 'a pretty neate college having a delicate chappell.' The chapel, especially the west front, of S. Peter's College, is one of the best specimens of the Renaissance Art at Cambridge. Hist, of Modern Architecture, p. 275. Fergusson. 16 SSX CHRISTOPHER WREN. visited, and hidden away in boxes. A wise precaution, for the commissioners destroyed all the other orna- ments, pulling down ' two mighty angels with wings, divers other angels, the four evangelists, and Peter with his keys on the chapel door, together with about a hundred cherubim and many superstitious letters in gold. Moreover,' they say, ' we found six angels on the windows which we defaced.' After the Restoration the hidden glass was brought forth again and put back in its place over the altar. 1 While Dr. Wren was thus adorning his college chapel King Charles did not show himself forgetful of Bishop Andrewes' well-loved pupil and chaplain, but in 1628 appointed him Dean of Windsor and registrar of the Order of the Garter. The year after this appointment the peace between England and France was solemnly ratified in the chapel at Windsor and Dean Wren administered the oath to the French ambassador, the Marquis de Chateauneuf. About this time, as his diary says, he was 'joined together in happy matrimony.' His wife was Eliza Brownrigg, the widowed daughter of Thomas Cull, Esquire, of Ipswich ; she had one daughter by her first marriage, and seems to have been possessed of some pro- perty in Suffolk. The marriage was in truth as happy as the cruel times in which their lot was cast would allow, though chequered with many sorrows ; for of the twelve children whose birth Wren records in his diary, six died while very young. When King Charles journeyed to Scotland for his coronation he summoned 1 Beauties of England and Wales (Cambridgeshire). BISHOPRIC OF HEREFORD. 17 Wren to attend him. No shadow of the coming trouble showed itself then. The young King was everywhere received with enthusiasm. Whether Dr. Wren, mindful of Andrewes' words, suspected what lay under this fair show, there is no record left to tell us. In after years Sir Thomas Widdrington's venomous attack on himself must have strangely recalled his tones when on this occasion he addressed the King in terms of fulsome adulation at Berwick. On his return from Scotland the King passed the holy week at York, where on Maunday Thursday Dr. Wren washed the feet of thirty-nine poor old men in warm water, drying them with a linen cloth, and Dr. Curie, Bishop of Winchester, washed them over again in white wine and then kissed them. Shortly after this, Dr. Lindsell, the Bishop of Hereford, died, and Matthew Wren was appointed (1634) to the vacant see. He thereupon resigned the Mastership of Peterhouse, probably with much regret, for all his life he retained a strong affection for his University. His successor was one whose name is well known in church history, Dr. John Cosin, afterwards Dean of Durham and Bishop of Peter- borough, a great authority on the ritual and ornaments of the Church. The King would not then suffer Wren to resign the Deanery of Windsor. When Dr. Juxon, who was Clerk of the Closet, was made Bishop of London, the King showed how highly he valued and esteemed Bishop Wren by giving him the post which Juxon resigned, and Dr. Wren then gave up his Deanery. His new post was one 18 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. of great nearness to the King ; to fill it well required great tact and a discreet deafness to the whispers of court intriguers. King Charles was well aware of this, and as soon as Wren had settled himself in his new post said to him : l ' Now you are at my elbow there will be many devices to set you and the Archbishop (Laud) at odds. But I warn you of it that you suffer no such trick to be put on you, and therefore I require you both, by that faith which I am sure you will both perform to me, to bind yourselves mutually neither of you to believe any report against the other ; and if you meet with any such thing, believe it not, yet presently impart it to each other.' The wisdom of the King's counsel was quickly shown, for when Dr. Hackett came in his turn of office as the next month's chaplain, he told Wren how they had expected him to be made Bishop of London, and but for the Archbishop preferring Juxon, as a man of whom he had experience and on whom he could rely, it would have been done. Wren paid no regard to these suggestions, suspecting them to be the device of some discontented courtier in order to make him the Archbishop's enemy. To keep his faith with the King and the Archbishop, he presently told them what had passed. The King praised his conduct and told him, ' there was no truth in the report, but only a plot to kindle coals between them two.' Bishop Wren began vigorous work in Hereford, 1 Life of Archbishop Juxon, p. 27. Rev. W. H. Marab. CONSECRATION OF ABBEY DO RE. 19 holding a visitation, collecting and setting in order the statutes of the cathedral, which were in a state of great confusion. Another congenial piece of work came also into his hands. John, Viscount Scudamore, a friend of Laud's, had inherited, with other property, the old Cistercian abbey of Dore, near Monmouth ; the building had been greatly damaged in the reign of Henry VIII., but the transepts, chancel, and lady chapel still stood, as they do now, and Lord Scuda- more was minded to restore the building to its true use. He accordingly repaired it, setting up again the old stone altar on its four pillars, and providing the church with everything needful for service. Bishop Wren was unable to consecrate the building himself, being in constant attendance on the King, but he busied himself in drawing up an office for the occasion, like, but not identical with, that used by Bishop Andrewes, and commissioned Bishop Field of S. David's to act for him. Bishop Wren was, as Lord Clarendon testifies, ' much versed in the old liturgies, particularly those of the Eastern Church.' He em- ployed himself, at Laud's request, in preparing a service for the reconciliation of those who had apostatised when in slavery with the Moors, and when released wished to return to the faith. The merchants and seamen who were taken by ' Barbary pirates/ and when released came sadly back to England with their story of cruel sufferings undergone and faith reluctantly forsworn, were numerous enough to require a special provision to be made for them. Knolles' quaint ' Historic of the Turks' shows that C3 20 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. they even made descents on the western coasts of England and carried off men, women, and children into slavery. In 1636, with some of the much-grudged ' ship-money/ a very successful expedition was made under Lord Rainsborough against Sallee, which re- sulted in the release of large numbers of captives and a promise from the Moorish king to suppress Christian slavery. It is significant that the real leader of the expedition was John Dunton, a reformed renegade taken off the Isle of Wight in command of a Sallee ship. He was tried and condemned, but saved his life by offering to show the assailable points of the Barbary ports, and sailed as master on Lord Rains- borough's ship. 1 The ' Form of Penance and Reconciliation of a Renegade or Apostate from the Christian Religion to Turcism/ 2 which Wren and Laud prepared together, is a very striking one. First came the solemn excom- munication, then for two Sundays the penitent came to the door of his parish church in a white sheet carrying a white wand, craving the prayers of all ' good Chris- tians for a poor wretched renegade ; ' on the second Sunday he was allowed to enter and kneel by the font and pray to be ' restored to the rights and benefits of the blessed sacrament which I have so wickedly abjured/ and then return to the church porch as before. On the third Sunday, when the Apostles' creed had been said, after being publicly put in mind 1 Annals of England, p. 407. 2 Eccles. Hist., vol. ix. p. 388, ed. 1841, Collier, where the office may be found entire. ' RECONCILIATION OF A RENEGADO* . 21 of his sin, and advised ' that a slight and ordinary sorrow is not enough for so grievous an offence,' the penitent, kneeling eastward, and bowing to the very pavement, was to confess his sin and declare his sorrow and repentance, and to ask the prayers of the congre- gation. Also to ' thank God for His mercies, especially for the divine ordinance of His Holy Sacraments, and of His heavenly power committed to His Holy Priests, in His Church for the reconciliation of sinners unto Himself and the absolving them from all their iniquity.' ' Then,' says the rubric, ' let the Priest come forth to him, and stand over him, and laying his hand on his head, say, as is prescribed in the Book of Common Prayer, thus : Our Lord Jesus Christ, who has left power to his Church to absolve all sinners which truly repent and believe in Him, of His great mercy forgive thee thine offences ; and, by His authority committed unto me, I absolve thee from this thy heinous crime of renunciation, and from all thy other sins, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.' After this follows, with slight alteration, a collect, also from the Visitation of the Sick, and then the priest was to take the penitent by the hand, take away from him the white sheet and the wand, and address to him, once again as dear brother, an affectionate exhortation to walk worthy ' of so great a mercy,' and promise him re-admission to the Holy Communion on the next opportunity. How often this service was employed 22 SfJ? CHRISTOPHER WREN. does not appear. The whole form is so beautiful that it is matter for regret it should be so much forgotten. Wren had been Bishop of Hereford but one year, when the Bishop of Norwich, Dr. R. Corbet, was translated to Oxford, and Bishop Wren translated in turn to the vacant see. It is easy to see Laud's hand in this. Norwich was a large wide diocese, much shaken by schism and faction and abounding with lecturers who were the torment of the Church at that time and were not unaptly compared ' to bats or rere- mice, being neither birds nor beasts, and yet both together,' x i.e. neither clerk nor layman. They were not unfrequently men who had been ordained without cure of souls and served as chaplains in gentlemen's houses, or men whose orders were doubtful, or mere laymen who had failed in other call- ings. They were all strong Calvinists, seldom read the services, but called a fast, quite irrespective of those of the Church, and gave a lecture. This speedily became a ' running lecture,' i.e. was not confined to one place but ran from parish to parish. Every pos- sible check was put by the Archbishop upon these lectures, which were fatal to the proper order of the parishes and all church discipline. Private gentlemen were forbidden to have chaplains, all who preached were compelled to wear a surplice and first to read the Church Service, and in the afternoon to teach the Church Catechism. Wren, Mainwaring, Corbet, Montague, and other like-minded bishops set them- selves vigorously to enforce the Archbishop's plans, -> introduction, p. 9. Heylin. FOREIGN CONGREGATIONS. 23 esteeming the discipline and doctrine of the Church more valuable than the popularity which their firmness forfeited. Norwich presented an especial difficulty to the Bishop in the great number of weavers and other workmen who had taken refuge there from the Low Countries in times of persecution, and who still kept up their schismatic services. As his treatment of the Norwich weavers has always been the principal ground of attack against Wren, from Lord Clarendon down to writers of the present time, it is needful to enter somewhat into the question, and to see where the truth lies. These foreign workmen had settled in England at various times, escaping from persecutions in the Low Countries and in France, and, though they had never had any distinct permission to use their own services, their doing so had been winked at by Queen Elizabeth and King James. Now they had reached a third generation and continued to profit by an exemption which was enjoyed by no other body of the kingdom. It will be borne in mind that as the laws then ran and were understood, every English subject was required to be also a member of the Church of England. The first generation of refugees were an exception, but when they reached a second and third generation, had their own ministers and pretended to the power of Ordination, they became an anomaly, and as Laud, when Bishop of London, said, ' The example is of ill-conse- quence in Church affairs to the subjects of England, many being confirmed by it in their stubborn ways and inconformities.' The matter was not likely to be mended CHRISTOPHER WREN. by Archbishop Abbot ; but when Laud succeeded him he addressed himself, in 1634, vigorously to the business, and set out this dilemma : 'If they were not of the same religion' (as the Church of England), 'why should they, being strangers, born in other countries, or descending from them, expect more liberty of conscience than the Papists had, being all natives, and descending from English parents ? If of the same, why should they not submit to the govern- ment and forms of worship, being the outward acts and exercises of the religion here by law established ? ' Every art that could be used was employed by the congregations to avoid returning an answer to the Archbishop's inquiries, whether the English-born members would conform and use the Liturgy in their own language. The two congregations in Norwich resisted vehemently and remonstrated with Bishop Corbet, who was then bishop of the diocese ; but Archbishop Laud himself visited the diocese and caused the injunction to be published in the congrega- tions. It had been modified until it only ordered that, while strangers, as long as they were strangers, might use their own discipline, yet that the English Liturgy should be translated into French and Dutch for the better fitting of their children to the English Govern- ment. In Canterbury, he kept them 'on a harder diet/ and allowed only the translated Liturgy. All this took place before Bishop Wren came to Norwich, so it is manifestly unjust to accuse him of having set the measure, moderate as it was, on foot. The con- gregations remained a focus of Calvinism and discon- NORWICH CLOTH WEAVERS, 25 tent, secretly encouraged by all the leading Puritans, and envied by the lecturers who wished themselves in the like case. Another trouble in Norwich, was the failure of business amongst the cloth weavers, whose trade was the chief industry of the town ; the failure appears to have been, in a great measure, caused by the plague, which raged in London in I636, 1 and put a stop for a considerable time to the weekly traffic between it and Norwich. Many of the workmen in consequence betook themselves to Holland, to obtain the means of livelihood. The same thing had happened in Bishop Corbet's time, but as in this instance it coincided with Wren's first visitation, there were not wanting those who said that his severity in enforcing conformity was the main reason of their departure. This accusation seems never to have been made at the time, but only later on, when every conceivable charge was being raked up against the Bishop. He truly says, that, often as at the council board the failure of the weaving trade and the emigration of the skilled workmen to Holland was lamented, it was never suggested that his severity was in any way the cause of it. In his defence, prepared for the House of Commons, the 1 ' On August 29, 1636 (the plague then raging in London), King Charles, the Queen, and the Court arrived at Oxford. The Chancellor (Archbishop Laud), the Vice-Chancellor, and numerous doctors and masters went out to meet the royal retinue. The Chancellor, accompanied by the Lord Treasurer (Bishop Juxon), the Bishop of Winchester (Dr. Curie), the Bishop of Norwich (Dr. M. Wren), and the Bishop of Oxford (Dr. Bancroft), rode in a coach.' The Court was entertained with very brilliant festivities, and a series of masks and interludes arranged by Inigo Jones. Oxfordshire Annals, p. 25, by J. M. Davenport. 26 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. Bishop, besides accounting for much of the emigration by the failure of trade, consequent on the plague, reduces the number, by comparing it with the records kept at the various ports, from the alleged 3,000 to about 300, and drily says : ' The defendant humbly conceiveth that the chiefest cause of their departure was the small wages given to the workmen, whereby the workmasters grew rich, and the workmen were kept very poor.' The charge has been often revived, the more so as though the accusation is well known enough, the de- fence, only to be found in the ' Parentalia,' is hardly known except to the few who have threaded the labyrinth of that scarce volume. That Wren was a great upholder of discipline and authority, a man of a fiery energetic temper, decided opinions, and an un- yielding, perhaps a severe, disposition, is certainly true ; but it is also true that he practised, as Laud and Strafford did, an even-handed justice, laying his hand on rich and poor alike, and would not turn aside for any suggestion of policy or expediency. It should, how- ever, in fairness be added, that though he made his authority felt and obeyed, he did not press matters to extremity against any clergyman without grave cause, and was very ready to receive those who showed any readiness to submit. Of the 1,300 clergy in the diocese, not including those attached to the Cathedral or the schoolmasters, in spite of ' many disorders,' there were in 1636 but thirty excommunicated or suspended, some for contumacy, some for obstinately refusing to publish the King's declaration, some 'for contemning 'NO LECTURE, BUT VERY MUCH PEACE? 27 all the Orders and Rites of the Church and intruding themselves, without licence from the Ordinary, for many years together/ His returns to the Archbishop show how very thoroughly and diligently he, to use a modern phrase, ' worked his diocese,' visiting parish after parish, causing the fabrics to be repaired, 1 the clergy to reside, to hold the appointed services and to catechise the children. Here and there a lecturer who promised conformity was allowed to remain, but generally they were checked and discouraged. Great Yarmouth must have gladdened the Bishop's heart, as, two years before Bishop Wren came to the Diocese, the lecturer had gone to New England, ' since which time,' the Bishop says, ' there hath been no lecture and very much peace in the town and all ecclesiastical orders well observed.' It was in truth a great under- taking to bring the Diocese of Norwich into order ; but Wren did not shrink from the task, and had all the support which the King and the Archbishop could give, a support afterwards imputed as a crime both to those who gave and to him who received it. 1 The state of the diocese is vividly shown in Bishop Corbet's charge of 1634 (for the repairs of old S. Paul's Cathedral). 'Some petitions,' he says, ' I have had since my coming to this diocese, for the pulling downe of such an isle [aisle] or for changing lead to thatch, soe far from reparations that our sute is to demolish. . . . Since Christmas I was sued to and I have it yett under their hands, the hand of the minister and the hand of the whole parish, that I would give way to their adorn- ing their church within and out, to build a stone wall round the church- yard which now had but a hedg. / took it for a flout at first, but it proved a very sute ; they durst not without leave mend a fault forty yeares ould.' The spire of Norwich Cathedral where Bishop Corbet was preaching had fallen in, and during three years but two yards had been rebuilt. See Documents relating to S. Paul's by Dr. Sparrow Simpson, p. 137. Camden Society. CHAPTER II. 1630-1640. DR. C. WREN BIRTH OF HIS SON CHRISTOPHER EAST KNOYLE ORDER OF THE GARTER HOW A MURDERER WAS DETECTED CHRISTOPHER AT WESTMINSTER A LATIN LETTER DIOCESE OF ELY IMPEACHMENT OF LORD STRAFFORD OF ARCHBISHOP LAUD ARTICLES AGAINST BISHOP WREN RESIGNS THE DEANERY OF THE CHAPELS ROYAL. Instead of kitchen-stuff, some cry A gospel-preaching ministry, And some for old suits, coats, or cloak, No surplices nor service-book. A strange harmonious inclination Of all degrees to Reformation. Hudibras, pt. i. canto 2. CHAPTER II. LESS is known of the early years of Christopher Wren than of his brother's more eventful life. Christopher went to Oxford, to S. John's College, was admitted to Holy Orders, and, like his brother, became chaplain to Bishop Andrewes, from whom in 1620 he received the living of Fonthill Bishops in Wiltshire. It may be said in passing, that to receive prefer- ment from Lancelot Andrewes was in itself a proof of merit, for it was his especial care, in the three dioceses which he successively governed, only to promote able and good men to ' such livings and preferments as fell within his gift, and to give Church preferment to none that asked for it' To this rule he rigidly adhered, and his disciple, Matthew Wren, followed the same plan when he became a Prelate of the Church. Christopher did not hold this living more than three years, and then received, also from Bishop Andrewes, the neighbouring living of East (or Bishop's) Knoyle, very near Fonthill Abbey, afterwards a place famous for its beauty and its curiosities, then the property of a Mr. Robert Cox. This gentleman had an only child, Mary, who inherited his property ; she became the wife of Christopher Wren, probably a few 32 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. years after his appointment to East Knoyle, where their seven children were born five girls, of only one of whom there is any subsequent record, and two sons. A Christopher, baptized in the November of 1630, who probably died very young, as in the register the record stands, ' Christopher, first sonne of Doctor Wren,' 'first' is added above in another hand. The next baptism is, ' Christopher, 2nd (sic) sonne of Christopher Wren, Dr. in Divinitie and Rector now.' This is in the entries for 1631 (O.S.), followed by those for March, and is dated only 'loth.' This ' second Christopher ' is the one who was to make the name afterwards so famous ; but the date is very perplexing. Dr. Wren and his son both reckoned the latter's age from his birthday, October 20, 1632, as appears again and again in the ' Parentalia,' notably in Dr. Wren's own MS. note to a letter from his son. 1 The East Knoyle Register would, if the baptism is rightly put among the entries for March 1631. (O.S.), make the birthday October 20, 1631 ; but it seems more likely that this is an error, and 1632 the correct date. At East Knoyle Dr. Wren appears to have passed most of his time, leaving it occasionally, as he had done his previous living, to attend on Bishop An- drewes. He was a good scholar, if less deeply learned than his brother ; a mathematician, a good musician, and had besides some knowledge of drawing and archi- tecture. He employed himself in decorating East Knoyle chancel, and to him, in all probability, are 1 Vide infra, p, 43. CHANCEL AT EAST KNOYLE. 33 owing the 1 ' flower borders, figures, and texts of Scrip- ture in raised plasterwork ' which, though much de- faced, still cover the chancel. The subjects are 'Jacob's Dream/ ' The Ladder with the Angels,' 'Jacob anointing the Pillar.' Over the chancel arch ' The Ascension of our Lord.' Round the capitals of the columns are quaint inscriptions : ' Unum necessarium.' The texts of holy Scripture, which are very well chosen, are all quoted from that earlier translation known as the ' Bishops' Bible,' to which the Psalms, Offertory sentences, and ' Com- fortable Words ' of the Prayer Book belong. Besides this, Wren contrived a new roof for the church, as the old one was falling into decay. In the hall of the rectory he put up the following inscription : ' In quamcunque domum introeritis primum dicite : paX sit hVIC DoMVI Tarn solenni praecepto, tempestivo voto Subscripsi introiens C. W. RECTOR, Julii 28. Anno dicto.' 3 1 I am indebted to the kindness of the Rev. R. N. Milford, rector of East Knoyle, for this account. See Sir R. C. Hoare's History of Wilt- shire. The inscriptions on the columns have been destroyed. 2 So guide and govern as to profit souls. Love, Pray. One thing needful. Ask fit things from God. 3 Into whatsoever house ye enter, first say Peace be to this house. To so solemn a precept, by a seasonable vow, I, entering, have set my name. C. W. Rector. July 28. In the said year, i.e. MDCXVVIII. D 34 MR CHRISTOPHER WREN. The inscription is not a little characteristic of the gentle, peace-loving nature of Christopher Wren, and the quaint conceits in which the wits of the time delighted. This form of chronogram was one which he frequently used. His second daughter, Susan, was born in 1627, and as she and the ' second Christopher ' clung closely together in after life, and the others are never mentioned, it seems likely that they two were the only survivors of the seven children. Christopher was a very delicate, weakly boy, who early gave promise of brilliant abilities. No records say when Mrs. Wren died, but various things seem to show that she died when her children were still very young. Dr. Wren had been one of the King's chaplains in ordinary since 1628, and so well did he acquit him- self that when his brother the Bishop resigned the deanery of Windsor and the registrarship of the Garter, the King appointed Christopher to the vacant post. Tt was an appointment which suited him well ; he took up with equal energy his brother's work, of arranging the documents and records, and continuing the history of the Order. Two autograph letters relating to this are preserved in the ' Parentalia,' one from the chan- cellor of the Garter, Sir Thomas Rowe : ' Reverend Sir, I had wayted on you before this tyme, but that I have been punished with Lamenes, both for my owne advantage to learne of y u and to acquaint y u with some orders I have received from his ma tie and to give y u ye summe of ye last chapiter as I conceived it.' Sundry particulars follow, and he promises a record GARTER RECORDS. 35 of the members of the Garter from its foundation. The King, he says, is anxious that every ' chapiter of the Order ' should be fully recorded. Sir Thomas asks for 'the papers of Sir John Fynnet' in order to send them to King Charles, 'who is very curious of them.' ' On all occasions,' the letter concludes, ' I shall be glad to give y u ye testimonye of my desire to be esteemed and to be y r affectionate friend to serve y u , ' THO. ROWE. 1 Cranford, 9 Jan. 1636 (O.S.) ' The Dean's answer comes promptly : 'Jan. 10, 1636 (O.S.) ' Honorable Sir, How much you obliged me I shall endeavour to demonstrate to you upon better oppor- tunities. For ye present I returne y r books and promise you ye sight of another some wt of them (?) w ch phaps you will not dislike, though I begin to think your exact diligence hath lefte none of those monuments lye undiscryed, where they might be gained. I send back likewise Sir John Finet's Paps ; whereof I reserve ye copyes. And now that I begin to finde a little respiration, I will draw y m up into acte. Till I had y m I could not well begin, and now that you are pleased to send me ye last, drawne up into forme, I shall ye better accomplish ye whole business of my little time. Whereof I will send you ye whole contextures, Deo dante, ere longe. I should however give you a formall thanks that you imploy yourselfe soe largely, soe nobly for me in present, and in promise more. Knowing your reality in all worth, I abstain from other com- D 2 36 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. pliments then those wherein Affection must pforce speake yf she speake at all. Once for all, that branch of our comon oath is never out of my minde : Sustentabis Honores hujus Ordinis atq. omni ra qui in eo stint. Of w ch omni m you are Pars Magna and shall ever be to your affectionate ob : servant friend, ' CHR. WREN. < To the Honble Sr. Tho. Row Chancelor of ye most Honble Order of ye Garter.' The Garter history appears to have been carefully continued, and Dean Wren describes, in a long pictur- esque account, the admission on May 19, 1638, of the Prince of Wales, then but eight years old, as a ' com- panion of the Garter.' The little Prince, Dean Wren says, acquitted himself admirably during the three days of intricate ceremonial, doing his part with accu- racy and spirit, a sweet dignity, and an unwearied patience until all was completed. He must have been a very hopeful, engaging, boy, and it is sad to think how little his after life fulfilled its early promise : had he remained in his father's care a very different record might have been left of him in English history. The Service of Admission is a curious one, and the prayers on the putting on the Garter, the ribbon, the collar, and the mantle have considerable beauty. On this occasion the festival was celebrated with great splendour. King Charles presented two large silver flagons, cunningly carved and very richly gilt, offering them on his knees with GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS. 37 these words : ' Tibi, et perpetuo Tuo servitio, partem bonitatis Tuae offero Domine Deus Omnipotens.' 1 These were added to the treasury of the Garter, which contained many articles of great value. There was a set of triple gilt silver plate wrought by Van Vianen 2 of Nuremberg, estimated at over 3,ooo/., several other pieces of plate, Edward IV.'s steel armour, gilt, and covered with crimson velvet embroidered with pearls, rubies and gold, fifteen rich copes em- broidered in gold, altar-cloths and hangings worked with the same costly material. There was also the blue velvet mantle, the George and Garter of Gustavus Adolphus, each letter of the motto made in diamonds. These had been sent to the King of Sweden by Charles I. at the close of the campaign in 1627 as a mark of friendship and respect for his valour, and were the richest ever sent even to a sovereign. After the heroic king's death on the field at Lutzen, in 1634, a solemn embassy brought the mantle and the jewels back to England, when they were consigned to the Dean and Chapter of Windsor, with a charge from King Charles to lay them up in the treasury 'for a perpetual memorial of that renowned King, who died in the field of battle wearing some of those jewels, to the great honour of the Order, as a true martial prince and companion thereof.' 1 ' To Thee, and to Thy service for ever, I offer a portion of Thy bounty, O Lord God Almighty.' 2 Christian Van Vianen was an embosser and chaser of plate, much esteemed by Charles I. The gilt plate above mentioned was wrought at the rate of 12s. per oz. Anecdotes of Painting, Walpole, vol. ii. p. 323. 38 SIH CHRISTOPHER WREN. A few years later King Charles presented Dean Wren to the rectory of Great Haseley * near Oxford, with a fine old church containing two crusaders' tombs. In the parish of Haseley is the manor of Ryecote (or Ricot), which by marriage had become the property of Sir Henry Norris, Queen Elizabeth's ambassador to France, whom she created Baron Norris (or Norreys) of Ryecot, and whose descendants, now the Earls of Abingdon, possess the manor to this day. During Dr. Wren's incumbency, a strange event took place. Among the retainers of Lord Norris was an old man who had charge of the fish ponds ; he had one nephew, who was the heir of all his uncle's possessions and savings. The nephew enticed the old man out one night, waited till he fell asleep under an oak tree, murdered him by a blow on the head, dragged the body to one of the ponds, tied a great stone to the neck and threw the corpse in. There it \&y five weeks, during which time Lord Norris and all the neighbours wondered what had become of the old man. At length the body was found by the men who were about to clean the pond, and were attracted to the spot by the swarms of flies ; they raised the corpse with great difficulty and recognised it. The stone tied to the neck was evidence of foul play, though no one could guess at the murderer. 1 William Lenthall (born at Henley-on-Thames 1591), Speaker of the House of Commons 1640-1653 and 1660, lived chiefly at Lachford Manor in Great Haseley parish, which had been in his family since the reign of Edward IV. The property was sold by his eldest son. It may have been owing to the influence of the Speaker that Dean Wren escaped imprisonment during the Rebellion. AN AWFUL WITNESS. 39 Lord Norris, in order to detect the criminal, after the usual manner, commanded that the corpse, preserved by the water from the last extremity of decay, should on the next Sunday be exposed in the churchyard, close to the church door, so that everyone entering the church should see and touch it. The wicked nephew shrank from the ordeal, feigning to be so overwhelmed with grief as to be unable to bear the sight of his dearest uncle. Lord Norris, suspecting that the old man had been murdered by the one person whom his death would profit, compelled him to come, and to touch with his finger, as so many had willingly done, the hand of the dead. At his touch, however, ' as if opened by the finger of God, the eyes of the corpse were seen by all to move, and blood to flow from his nostrils.' At this awful witness the murderer fell on the ground and avowed the crime, which he had secretly committed and the most just judgment of God had brought to light. He was delivered to the judge, sentenced, and hanged. The event must have made a deep impression on Dean Wren, who recorded it at length in Latin and signed the record to attest its truth. He also mentions that in the east window of the church was the ' Coat of France azure frette" and seme of Flower de Lyces or, put there together with his own coat by Lord Barentine, knight of Rhodes and a great bene- factor to that church. A man of great valour and possessions in France as well as in England, his tomb at the north-east side of the chancel shows he was of a 40 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. gigantic stature; and his statue of one entire stone, which I digged out of a heap of rubbish there, makes it appear he was (not two inches lower than) seven foot high.' Dr. Wren seems to have divided his residence between Haseley and Windsor, probably spending most of his time at the Deanery, where many of the learned men and philosophers of the day sought his society. Among these was the Prince Palatine Charles, who was a frequent guest at the Deanery, enjoying its learned quiet, and interested in his host's young son, whose great gifts were early remarkable. Many a little note did Dean Wren make of curious things that came under his observation, particularly of an oak that grew in the New Forest and sent out young fresh leaves on Christmas Eve. So much discussion was raised about it at court and King James would so little believe it, that good Bishop Andrewes sent a chaplain on Christmas Eve to the forest, who gathered about a hundred fresh shoots, stuck them into wet clay, and sent them straight to the court, where Dr. Wren witnessed the opening of the boxes. The tree was then cut down by some spiteful fellow, ' who,' says the Dean, 1 made his last stroke on his own leg, whereof he died, together with the old wondrous tree.' King Charles engaged Dr. Wren to make an estimate for a building at Windsor for the use of the Queen ; it was to be of considerable size, containing a chapel, a banqueting room, galleries and rooms for the Lord Chamberlain and court officials. The estimate exists in business-like detail, the total amounting to I 3'35^ J but it was probably not even begun. CHRISTOPHER AT WESTMINSTER. 41 To his other employments the Dean added the tender care of his young son. Christopher's case was one of those rare ones in which a precocious child not only lives to grow up, but also amply fulfils his early pro- mise. His delicate health was the cause of much anxiety to his father and to his sister Susan, and it may be that the skill in nursing and medicine for which she was afterwards famous, had their beginning in her watchful care of her little brother. His frail health seems to have been rather a spur than a hindrance to his studies, and when very young he had a tutor, the Rev. W. Shepheard, who prepared him for Westminster, where he was sent in his ninth or tenth year. Westminster was then under the rule of its famous headmaster Dr. Busby, to whose especial care young Christopher was committed. The school with its stir of life, the grand abbey, the Houses of Parliament then empty and silent, Lambeth, from which his uncle's friend, Archbishop Laud, might be seen frequently coming across the river in his barge ; the whole surroundings must have been wonderful to the country -bred boy who was one day to connect his name indissolubly with that of London. Did he, one cannot but wonder, ever on a holiday take boat down the river, shooting the dangerous arches of London Bridge, and look at S. Paul's with its long line of roof, its tall tower and shattered spire ; little S. Gregory's nestling by its side, and all the workmen busied on the repairs which had been begun after King James's solemn thanksgiving in 1620? Laud, while Bishop of London, had carried on the works with a 42 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. vigour that had given them a fresh impetus, and was one great cause of his unpopularity. Inigo Jones had superintended them and finished the interior, and at the west end, the stately portico of Portland stone, which, though incongruous, was in itself beautiful, was being erected by King Charles's orders. How little could the boy have guessed at the ruin which was approaching those pious builders, or the desecration and destruction that awaited the fine old building itself ! At school no pains were spared with so promising a pupil as young Wren soon showed himself to be. His sister Susan married, in 1643, Mr. William Holder, subdean of the Chapel Royal, of a Notting- hamshire family, a good mathematician, and one ' who had good skill in the practic and theoretic parts of music.' l Susan Wren was sixteen when she married, and though childless the marriage was a very happy one. Mr. Holder early discerned his young brother-in- law's talent for mathematics and gave him private lessons. Mr. Holder was subsequently appointed to the living of Bletchingdon in Oxfordshire, which he held until 1663. Among the few autograph letters of Christopher Wren's which remain in the family, is one written to his father from Westminster in a boy's unformed hand, the faintly ruled lines still showing. 2 ' Venerande Pater, Sententia apud antiques vulgata 1 Wood, Fasti Oxon., p. 139. 2 ' Revered Father, There is a common saying among the ancients which I remember to have had from your mouth ; there is no equivalent that can be given back to parents. For their cares and perpetual labours THE FIRST FRUITS OF HIS PAINS. 43 est, quam ex ore tuo me habuisse memini, Parenti- bus nihil posse reddi sequivalens. Frequentes enim curae et perpetui labores circa pueros sunt immensi quidem amoris indicium. At praecepta ilia mihi toties repetita, quae animum ad bonas Artes, & Virtutem impellunt, omnes alios amores superant. Quod meum est, efficiam, quantum potero ne ingrato fiant hac munera. Deus Optimus Maximus conati- bus meis adsit et Tibi, pro visceribus illis Paternae Pietatis, quae maxime velis praestet. ' Id orat Filius tuus, Tibi omni obsequio devo- tissimus, ' CHRISTOPHORUS WREN. ' Has tibi primitias Anni, Pater, atq. laborum Praesto (per exiguas qualibet esse sciam) Quas spero in messem posse olim crescere, vultu Si placido acceptes tu, foveasque sinu.' ' To you, Deare Sir, your Son presenteth heere The first-fruits of his pains and of the yeare ; Wich may (though small) in time an harvest grow, If you to cherish these, your favour shew. ' E. Musaeo Meo. 'Calendis Januarii 1641 (1642 N.S.)' concerning their children are indeed the evidence of immeasurable love. Now these precepts so often repeated, which have impelled my soul towards all that is highest in man, and to virtue, have superseded in me all other affections. What in me lies I will perform, as much as I am able, lest these gifts should have been bestowed on an ungrateful soul. May the good God Almighty be with me in my undertakings and make good to thee all thou most desirest in the tenderness of thy fatherly love. Thus prays thy son, most devoted to thee in all obedience, 'CHRISTOPHER WREN.' ' Script, hoc, A ^Etatis suae, Decimo. Ab Octobris 20 elapso ' is the note in different hand of Dean Wren, who may very probably have felt that in the fast-rising storm all this fair promise might be swept away. 44 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREtt. While young Christopher was thus delighting his father with his ' first-fruits,' his uncle the Bishop was encountering many adversities. While he was busied in Norwich, and in the midst of his work, Dr. White, Bishop of Ely, died ; he had resided mostly in London, as was then too commonly the habit of the bishops, and it is to be supposed that there was plenty of work to be done in the diocese. Laud reckoned it as a very important one on account of its university, and could think of no one so well suited to the post as Bishop Wren, who was a distinguished Cambridge scholar. To Ely accordingly the Bishop was trans- lated, May 5, 1638, and rejoiced in renewing his connection with the university where his early years had been spent. The expenses attending so many re- movals must have fallen heavily upon him ; all the more, as in Norwich the palace was out of repair and he lived for some time in a house of his own at Ipswich, which was probably a part of Mrs. Wren's property, finding that much attention was required by that part of his diocese. Prynne was born at Ipswich, and though shut up in the Tower of London, 1 retained friends in his native town ; thus the Bishop knew he was entering a hornet's nest. Prynne speedily produced his ' Quench-Coal,' which professed to answer a tract called ' A Coal from the Altar,' wherein were explained the reasons for placing the Holy Table altarwise, and railing it in. Next came ' The News from Ipswich,' which reviled all bishops under the names of ' Luciferian Lord Bishops, execrable Tray- 1 Heylin, Cypr. Ang. t p. 309. DIOCESE OF ELY. 45 tors, Devouring Wolves,' and the like ; especially attack- ing Wren, and declaring, that, ' in all Queen Mane's time, no such havoc was made in so short a time of the faithful ministers in any part, nay in the whole Land, than had been made in his Diocese.' There was one great riot at Ipswich, which the Bishop was able to quell. Prynne was fined, branded, and imprisoned in Carnarvon Castle, and the town was for the time tranquil, but Prynne was destined to be a deadly and utterly unscrupulous enemy. For nearly two years after his translation to Ely, Dr. Wren was able to govern his new diocese in com- parative peace. Little opposition seems to have been made, for the factious spirit which was rampant in Nor- folk and Suffolk was less violent here. In his beloved university there were many points which needed amendment. When he was master of Peterhouse and built the chapel, he gave it that which many colleges then lacked, and were lacking still when he returned, to visit Cambridge. The churchyards of the parish churches had been in many instances encroached upon and profaned, and in most of the chancels were ' common seats over high and unfitting that place.' ' In all these businesses,' says Archbishop Laud in his yearly report to the King, 'the Bishop hath been very tender, both out of his respect to his mother the University of Cambridge, and be- cause divers of the benefices are impropriations belong- ing to some of the Colleges there.' Nor was Wren's care alone for the fabrics of the Church ; he was careful to secure resident and diligent clergy in all the parishes 46 Sfff CHRISTOPHER WREN. as far as he could and to see that they did their duty. His advice and help were readily given. A clergy- man, Mr. John Bois, applied to him for advice in the case of a woman of twenty-nine, of whom no one knew whether or no she was baptized. Mr. Bois had applied by letter and word of mouth to the previous Bishops of Ely (Bishops Buckeridge and White), and could get no answer. Bishop Wren replied to him promptly, directing him to baptize her forthwith, which was accordingly done. 1 Upon these peaceful labours the long-pending storm broke and called Wren to harder duties. In 1640 the discontent of the times declared itself openly in Scotland, where the Puritan party took up arms against the King, and began to league themselves with the party in England whose opinions or prejudices coincided with their own. King Charles had sum- moned a parliament, and again dismissed it, having obtained no assistance against the Scotch. ' The minds of men had taken such a turn,' says Hume, ' as to ascribe every honour to the refractory opposers of the King and the ministers. These were the only patriots, the only lovers of their country, the only heroes, and perhaps, too, the only true Christians.' The mob of sectaries in London, encouraged by the successes obtained by the Scotch, burst into S. Paul's, 1 Desiderata Curiosa, p. 336. Peck. It will be borne in mind that the Office for the Baptism of such as are of Riper Years was only added to the Prayer Book at the last revision in 1662. Mr. John Bois was made a Prebendary of Ely by Bishop Andrewes, and was one of the translators of the Bible (1604-161 1) ; he was on the Cambridge Committee, and assisted in the translation of the Apocrypha. Key to the Holy Bible, p. 28. Rev. J. H. Blunt. A GLEAM OF SUNSHINE. 47 where the High Commission then sat, and tore down the benches, with cries of ' No Bishops no com- mission ! ' Before this they had attacked Lambeth Palace, threatening to tear the Archbishop in pieces, and would probably have done so had he not been pre- pared for them. From that time he knew his life to be in constant peril. An unknown friend had written to warn him that the Scotch Puritans justified assassi- nation, and openly hoped the Primate might meet the same fate as his early friend and patron, the Duke of Buckingham. His integrity and singleness of mind, to which Clarendon gives high testimony, had made him bitter enemies. A hasty temper and sharp mode of speech alienated many who could not but respect him. The difficulties of his task had been doubled by the lax, un-Catholic rule of his predecessor at Lambeth. Both Puritans and Romanists alike reckoned him as their greatest opponent. He was nearly seventy years old, and sadly felt that ' there wanted not many pre- sages of his ruin and death.' The King's return, on October 30, brought a gleam of sunshine. Evelyn l says : ' I saw His Majesty (coming from his Northern expe- dition) ride in pomp and a kind of ovation with all the markes of a happy peace, restored to the affections of his people, being conducted through London with a most splendid cavalcade ; and on 3 November following (a day never to be mentioned without a curse), to that long, ungrateful, foolish, and fatal Parliament, the beginning of all our sorrow for 1 Diary, October 30, 1640. 48 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. twenty years after, and the period of the most happy monarchy in the world.' In truth its opening augured ill for the country and for the Church. Lord Strafford was impeached and sent to the Tower, and the Archbishop next attacked. Sir Har- bottle Grimston, in a virulent speech, vented his hatred against Archbishop Laud ; ' and those prelates he hath advanced to name but some of them : Bishop Man- waring, the Bishop of Bath and Wells, the Bishop of Oxford, and Bishop Wren the last of all those birds, but one of the most unclean ones.' The debate which followed ended as in the temper of the House it was certain to do in a vote that the Archbishop was a traitor. Allowed the afternoon at Lambeth to collect papers for his defence, he attended the evening prayers for the last time in the chapel that he had re- paired and adorned with loving care. The service, which he had restored to its full beauty, soothed that bitter hour. ' The Psalms of the day (December 1 8) and chapter 1. of Isaiah gave me great comfort. God make me worthy to receive it,' he wrote in his diary. The poor thronged round Lambeth Palace, and bitterly lamented the departure of their best friend, showering blessings on his head as he was carried away. He remained in the custody of Maxwell, the Usher of the Black Rod, ten weeks, compelled to pay 4367. for his charges, besides a fine of 5/. He was then trans- ferred to the Tower. The Archbishop being secured, the Bishops were next attacked. Hampden came to the Lords with a message to acquaint their lordships that the Commons WREN UNDER CENSURE. 49 had received matters of a high kind against the Bishop of Ely, for the ' setting up of idolatry and superstition in divers places, and acting the same in his own person ; ' adding that he was intending to escape from England, and that they therefore desired he might be put in security, to be forthcoming and abide the judg- ment of Parliament. Bishop Wren was in his place in the House when this summons came, and was ordered to find bail for io,ooo/. ; helped by three of the bishops, he managed to do so. When the Primate was in custody, and Wren under censure, at the be- ginning of the next year Lord Strafford was attacked. Dr. Williams, Bishop of Lincoln, not long released from the Tower, anxious to please the Commons, de- clared that the canon law forbade the Bishops to sit as judges in a case of blood. He spoke in the name of the other Bishops ; and the decision was too welcome to Strafford's enemies not to be agreed to instantly ; but it was a concession afterwards very dangerous to those who made it. The issue of that iniquitous trial, perhaps as great a perversion of justice as England had ever then known, needs no repetition here. The King's best advisers were in prison or under restraint, except good Bishop Juxon, who bravely told him he ought not, upon any considerations in the world, to do anything against his conscience ; and Bishop Williams, who hated Strafford and Laud alike, sent by the Commons to induce the King to sign the death- warrant, had a fatal success. Bishop Wren came to Windsor after this to marry Princess Mary, the King's eldest daughter, to William, E 50 SJX CHRISTOPHER WREN. eldest son of Henry Frederick, Prince of Orange, whom he succeeded in six years. The alliance was one which gratified the Parliament, being so Protestant a connection. Little, however, could they have guessed how deadly an enemy Princess Mary's son would prove to the house of Stuart. Ten days after this wedding came May 1 2, when ' the wisest head in England was severed from the shoulders of Lord Strafford.' So writes John Evelyn. To the Arch- bishop, his friend's death must have been a terrible blow. He was just able to bestow a parting blessing through his prison window, and to hear Lord Strafford say, ' Farewell, my lord. God protect your innocency.' The Princess's marriage was the last occasion on which Bishop Wren was to officiate as Dean of the Chapels Royal. The Commons had been industriously at work against him since the first attack in December, and as Archbishop Laud said of Prynne, ' by this time their malice had hammered out somewhat.' The committee sent in a report, charging the Bishop with ' excom- municating fifty painful ministers, practising super- stition in his own person, placing " the table " altar- wise, elevation of the elements, the "eastward posi- tion," as it is now called, at the Eucharist, bowing to the Altar, causing all seats to be placed so that the people faced east, employing his authority to restrain "powerful preaching," and ordering catechising in the words of the Church Catechism only, permitting no prayer before the sermon but the bidding prayer BISHOP WREN'S RESIGNATION. 51 (canon 5), publishing a book of articles, to which the churchwardens were sworn, containing 187 questions.' Upon this report a debate ensued, ending in a vote that it was the opinion of the House that Matthew Wren was unworthy and unfit to hold or exercise any office or dignity in the Church, and voting that a message be sent to the House of Lords to desire them to join the Commons in petitioning his Majesty to remove Bishop Wren from his person and service, Evelyn's expression, 'to such an exorbitancy had the times grown,' aptly describes the state of matters when, for details such as these of the government of a diocese, and for practices which, if they had been proved, were both legal and reasonable, an assembly of laymen pre- sumed to pronounce a bishop unfit for his office in the Church. Whether the petition ever came before the King does not appear, but Wren thought it best to take the initiative ; for he writes in his diary five days after the debate : ' I hardly obtained leave from the King to resign the deanery of the Chapels Royal.' CHAPTER III. 1641-1647. BISHOP WREN ACCUSED WESTMINSTER ABBEY ATTACKED IM- PRISONMENT OF THE BISHOPS BISHOP WREN'S DEFENCE 'UTTERLY DENIETH ALL POPISH AFFECTIONS' THE GARTER JEWELS ARCHBISHOP LAUD MURDERED CHRISTOPHER AT OXFORD PHILOSOPHICAL MEETINGS. For though outnumber'd, overthrown, And by the fate of war run down, Their duty never was defeated, - Nor from their oaths and faith retreated ; For loyalty is still the same, Whether it win or lose the game ; True as the dial to the sun, Although it be not shined upon. Hudibras, pt. in. canto 2. CHAPTER III. THE concession Bishop Wren had thus made did not satisfy the Commons, and on July 20 they drew out the report into twenty articles of accusation, containing all the former charges and several additional ones, among which were the setting up of altar-rails, order- ing the Holy Communion to be received kneeling, ordering the reading of the ' Book of Sports/ and preaching in a surplice ; causing by prosecutions 3,000 of the King's poor subjects to go beyond the sea. For these offences they prayed that Bishop Wren might answer> and suffer such punishment as law and justice required. The articles were transmitted to the House of Lords at a conference, and were read by Sir T. Widdrington, Recorder of York, 1 who prefaced them by a venomous speech against the Bishop of Ely, whom he compared to ' a wolf devouring the flock ; an extinguisher of light ; a Noah, who sent out doves from the ark, and refused to receive them back unless they returned as ravens, to feed upon the carrion of his new inventions, he himself standing with a flaming sword to keep such out of his diocese.' He accused the Bishop of raising fines for his own profit ; called him a great robber, a malefactor, ' a compleat mirror of 1 Vide supra, p. 17. 56 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. innovation, superstition, and oppression : an oppugner of the life and liberty of religion, and a devouring serpent in the diocese of Norwich/ These are but a few phrases from Sir Thomas's speech ; he used no argument, adduced no proof, but contented himself simply with clamour and reviling, and these were amply sufficient. In the Long Parlia- ment it was enough to accuse anyone, especially a bishop, of Popery, superstition and ' innovation ' which was a term invented by Bishop Williams, then as now commonly applied to the oldest dogmas and practices of the Church to insure his imprisonment, or at the least a heavy fine. In Wren's Diary opposite the day of the month is merely, ' Let God arise, and let his enemies be scattered.' Dr. Pierce, Bishop of Bath and Wells, was attacked at the same time ; but at first no active steps were taken against them, perhaps because the Commons found matters not yet ripe for a whole- sale imprisonment of the Bishops. Dr. Wren well- knew that matters would not stop here, and while awaiting the next attack began to prepare his Defence against the Articles of Accusation. The mob in the meanwhile were encouraged by caricatures, libels, and invectives to rail against the Bishops and impute every misfortune and every trade failure to them, by which means the Puritan leaders contrived to stir up a yelling mob of men and women. All petitions against the Church were received and the petitioners encouraged and praised. The populace insulted the Bishops whenever they appeared, and threatened their lives. Westminster Abbey was at- ATTACK ON WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 57 tacked, when the Bishops were there, by a violent mob, led by Wiseman, a knight of Kent. The officers and choirmen of the Abbey with the boys of the School, among whom must have been Christopher Wren, defended it gallantly, and the fray ended when Wise- man was killed by a tile thrown from the battlements by one of the defenders. After this the Bishops who were in London met in the Deanery at Westminster, the lodging of Williams, Archbishop of York, who had just been translated from Lincoln to York, in succes- sion to the late Archbishop Neile, 1 to consult what should be done. At the Archbishop's suggestion, they drew up a paper, remonstrating against the abuse offered them, and the manner in which they had been hindered from coming to the House of Lords, their coaches overset, their barges attacked and prevented landing, and they themselves beset and threatened. They claimed their right to sit in the House of Lords and vote, and protested against all that had been done since the 27th of that month (December, 1641), and all that should hereafter pass in time of this their forced and violent absence. This paper was signed by the Archbishop and eleven Bishops, of whom Bishop Wren was one, and presented to the King, who delivered it to Littleton, the Lord Keeper, to be communicated next day to the Peers. The Lord Keeper, who had already deserted his benefactor, Lord Strafford, contrary to the King's orders showed 1 R. N eile, successively Bishop of Rochester, Lichfield, Lincoln, Durham and Winchester, and Archbishop of York, died 1640. Godwin speaks strongly of his loyalty to Church and King, and the hatred borne to him by the Puritans. Praesul. Ang. 5 8 SIR CHRISTOPHER the paper first to ' some of the preaching party in both Houses,' and then to the Peers. Upon the reading a conference was desired between the Houses, and the Lord Keeper declared that the Bishops' paper con- tained ' matters of high and dangerous consequence, extending to the deep intrenching upon the funda- mental privileges and being of Parliament.' The Commons, whose part, like that of the Lord Keeper, 1 was pre-arranged, impeached the Bishops of high treason ; the usher of the Black Rod was despatched to find and bring them before the House. They, lodging in different parts of London, were not all collected until eight o'clock on the winter's night, and then, their offence being signified, were committed to the Tower. 2 The Bishops of Durham and Lichfield, both aged and infirm, obtained leave to be in the custody of the Black Rod. The other bishops were carried to the 1 ' The Commons not being able to come at their intended alterations in the Church while the Bench of Bishops remained entire in the House of Peers, formed several schemes to divide them.' Hist, of the Puritans, vol. ii. p. 388. Neale. 2 ' We, poor souls,' says Joseph Hall, Bishop of Norwich, in his Hard Measure, ' who little thought we had done anything that might deserve a chiding, are now called to our knees at the bar, and charged severally with high treason, being not a little astonished at the suddenness of this crimination compared with the perfect innocency of our own intentions, which were only to bring us to our due places in Parliament with safety and speed, without the least purpose of any man's offence ; but now traitors we are in all the haste, and must be dealt with accord- ingly. For on December 30, in all the extremity of frost at eight o'clock on the dark evening, are we voted to the Tower ; only two of our number had the favour of the Black Rod, by reason of their age, which though desired by a noble lord on my behalf would not be granted ; wherein I acknowledge and bless the gracious Providence of my God, for had I been gratified I had been undone both in body and purse ; the rooms being strait, and the expense beyond the reach of my estate.' Annals of England* p. 420. THE DECOY DUCK. 59 Tower on the following morning. A libellous pam- phlet was published at this time, entitled 'Wren's Anatomy, discovering his notorious Pranks &c., printed in the year when Wren ceased to domineer/ has in the title-page a print of Bishop Wren sitting at a table ; out of his mouth proceed two labels : on one, ' Canonical Prayers ; ' on the other, ' No Afternoon Sermon.' On one side stand several clergy, over whose heads is written ' Altar-cringing Priests.' On the other, two men in lay habits, above whom is this inscription, 1 Churchwardens for Articles.' It serves to show what were considered as really the Bishop's crimes, and that he had a fair proportion of faithful clergy. 1 The Archbishop of York had served the Commons' turn in procuring the King's assent to Lord Strafford's death- warrant, and had enjoyed for a short time a remark- able though transient popularity both on that account and as Laud's bitter opponent. The Commons were, however, soon weary of him, and gladly availed them- selves of the pretext afforded by the protest to throw him aside. A pamphlet was published, which had a great success, entitled the ' Decoy Duck,' in allusion to the fens of his former diocese of Lincoln, in which he was represented as only released from the Tower in order to decoy the other bishops there. It was thought prudent that the bishops should make no attempt either to see each other, or Archbishop Laud, who had preceded them to that dreary lodging, so that only loving messages passed between the prisoners. So many bishops being in custody, and five sees vacant, 1 Biographical History of England, vol. ii. p. 157. Grainger, 60 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREtf. the Commons took their opportunity, and brought in a Bill depriving the Bishops of their seats in Parlia- ment, and of the power of sitting as judges or privy councillors. It was feebly opposed by the Churchmen, who had been alienated by the prelates' desertion of Lord Strafford, and was finally carried. The remark made a little later bv Lord Falkland on Sir E. Deer- * ing's ' Bill for the Extirpation of Episcopacy/ when the Churchmen, weary of their attendance, left the House at dinner-time, and did not return ' Those who hated the bishops, hated them worse than the devil, and those who loved them did not love them so well as their dinner,' appears to have been ap- plicable to this occasion also. Not very long after the first-named Bill had passed, some of the bishops were set at liberty, but Bishop Wren was not released until May 6, 1642. It was a brief respite. He went down to his diocese, to a house at Downham, near Ely, where his wife and children were living, and there, August 17, he kept the last wedding-day that he and his wife were ever to celebrate together. On August 25 King Charles set up his standard at Nottingham and the Civil War began. On the 3oth of the month Bishop Wren's house was entered by soldiers and he was taken prisoner, without, it will be observed, the shadow of a legal charge against him. On September ist he was again thrown into the Tower, leaving Mrs. Wren with a daughter only eight days old and mourning for their son Francis, who had died in the previous month. Matthew, the eldest son, was IMPRISONMENT. 61 then only thirteen years old. Bishop Wren's was a singularly steadfast, hopeful nature, and it may be that he expected to be speedily released by the victorious Royalist armies. Could he have foreseen the duration of his imprisonment and the miseries which were to befall the Church and the country, even his dauntless spirit might have been crushed. He did not seek an interview with Archbishop Laud, lest they should be accused of plotting, and so each injure the other. Otherwise it would not have been difficult, as the Archbishop was at first carelessly watched, in the hope that he would, by escaping, rid the Commons of a difficulty. The Archbishop ' would not, at seventy years, go about to prolong a miserable life by the trouble and shame of flying,' though Grotius sent him an intreaty to copy the example of his own marvellous escape from Loevenstein Castle twenty-one years pre- viously. 1 The services in the Tower Chapel, where they probably met at first, could have given them little comfort, marred and mangled as the services were by the intruders, who came often with no better object than to preach insulting sermons against the prelates. Dr. Wren busied himself in the completion of the ' Defence,' to which allusion has been made in the first chapter. 2 It is too long to allow of being set out in full, but a few points may be touched upon. Of the ' fifty painful ministers ' whom he was said to have excommunicated, for some of the sentences there was, as has been said, very sufficient reason. As the Bishop says, ' Excommunication doth by law fall upon those 1 Vide Life of Barne-velde, vol. i. p. 408. Motley. 2 P. 26. 62 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. that are absent, either from visitation, or synods ; and suspension is a censure which in the practice of those courts is incurred in one hour and taken off in another, and is of little or no grievance at all except it be wil- fully persisted in.' He complains of so vague a charge, not stating who the clergy were, and proceeds as well as he can recollect to mention those who had fallen under his censure. For those whose licence to preach had been withdrawn, the greater number ought never to have received it at all ; one had been a broken tradesman in Ipswich, one a country apothecary, another a weaver, another 'no graduate, not long translated from common stage-playing to two cures and a publick lecture.' Yet still when all were reckoned who had ever been censured or admonished, the Bishop thinks that the fifty will hardly be made up. l It is a curious instance of the temper of the times that one head of so serious an indictment should be that 'To manifest his Popish Affections, he in 1636, caused a crucifix to be engraven upon his Episcopal seal.' Bishop Wren carefully addresses himself to the defence of this point, and to that of bowing at the name of our Lord, and to the Altar. 1 He began so to do by the example of that learned and holy Prelate Bishop Andrewes, now with God, 1 'Certainly,' says Nalson, 'notwithstanding this black accusation (he is speaking of the ' fifty painful ministers '), there cannot be a greater demonstration of the innocence of this worthy prelate than the very articles ; and that this accusation wanted proof to carry it further than a bare accusation, and a commitment to the Tower, where, with the courage and patience of a primitive Christian, he continued prisoner till the year 1660.' History of the Puritans, vol. ii. p. 223. Grey, Examination of Neale's. BO W 'ING TO THE ALTAR, 63 under whom this defendant was brought up from his youth, and had depended upon him more than forty years since, and constantly and religiously practised the same upon all occasions .... as his own years and studies increased he found first, the bowing at the name of the Lord Jesus, had not only been practised by the clergy but had also been enjoined to all the people, ever since the first reformation, as appeareth by the Injunctions, i Eliz. Cap. 52, thereby to testify our due acknowledgment that the Lord Jesus Christ, the true and Eternal Son of God, is the only Saviour of the world, in whom alone the mercies, graces and promises of God to mankind for this life and the life to come are fully and wholly com- prised, i Jac. Can. 18.' For bowing to the Altar, while setting out how old a practice of the Church it was, designedly continued at the Reformation, how a like reverence was paid always to the King, or to his chair of estate if he was not in the Presence Chamber, * No Christian would ever deny that bowing or doing adoration, was to be used as a part of God's worship, the affirmative act being necessarily included in the negative precept, " Non adorabis ea, ergo adorabis Me." ' ' No more as he humbly conceiveth is it any superstition, but a sign of devotion, and of an awful apprehension of God's divine Presence, to do Him reverence at the approach into the House of God, or unto the Lord's Table. . . . For the crucifix * He utterly denieth all popish affections, and saith that the figure of Christ upon 64 /coor/tog e/u,ol Kaya> TO> /co'cr/xa>," being taken out of S. Paul, Gal. vi. 14 In an holy imitation whereof this defendant beareth divers coats of arms (as the use is) upon the said seal, to wit, the arms of the See of Norwich, and the arms of the See of Hereford, and of the Deanery of Windsor, and of the Mastership of Peterhouse, together with his own paternal coat of an ancient descent ; he, considering with himself, that these were emblems all, and badges but of worldly and temporal glories, and desiring that the world should have a right apprehension of him, and to testify that he did no way glory in any thing of this transitory world, but humbly endeavoured to wean himself from all temporal and vain rejoycing, he therefore caused such a small figure of Christ on the Cross to be set over all the said coats.' He adds that he principally used it in signing ' pre- sentments of Popish recusants.' . . . not to say that although the said seal lay all the year long locked up in a chest, but at the time of sealing, and that when any sealing there was no worship done by any ; yet nevertheless, as soon as he understood that any, had taken scruple at it, he presently, to avoid all pretence of scandal, caused the said seal to be altered and the figure of Christ to be wholly omitted.' 1 1 It is curious that nearly as violent an attack was made a hundred EASTWARD POSITION. 65 The part of the Defence, which has been most chal- lenged, is that for the use of the ' Eastward position.' It is, however, important to remember that the Bishop had to defend himself against the charge, that once, while celebrating in the Tower Church at Ipswich, he had ' used idolatrous actions ' in administering the Holy Communion, Consecrating the Elements with his face eastward, elevating the Paten and Chalice 'above his shoulders and bowing low either to or before them when set down on the Table.' The charge of ' idolatry ' divides itself into three heads. The last two Wren met by a full denial, the first he confesses, while explaining his reason for his position in that special instance, when, as he says, the Elements being on the middle of the Holy Table, ' were farther from the end thereof than he^ being but low of stature, could reach over his book unto them and yet still proceed in reading the words without stop or interruption and without danger of spilling the Bread and Wine . . . and he humbly conceiveth that although the Kubrick 1 says that the Minister shall stand at the north side of the Table, yet .it is not so to be meant as that upon no occasion during all Corn- years later upon Bishop Butler (the author of the Analogy), because, when Bishop of Bristol, he put up a plain, inlaid, black marble cross in the Chapel of the Palace there. He died 1752. 1 The Rubric before the Prayer of Consecration in the Prayer Book of 1559-1604, was simply : ' Then the Priest, standing up, shall say as followeth.' The first rubric of position at the beginning of the service had placed him ' at the north side of the Table.' For a full and very interesting defence of Bishop Wren, see Worship in the (Church of England, Right Honourable A. B. B. Hope, and, Dean Howson 'Before the Table] by the same author, in the Church Quarterly Review, January, 1876. F 66 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. munion time he shall step from it.' For the rest, the whgle tone of the Defence is brave and dignified ; and despite the knowledge that his life was at stake, despite of the ' humbly conceiveth ' which runs through it, it is evident that the Bishop considered his position to be in reality unassailable, and that he was more or less con- descending in making these explanations. There is an irony in the studied simplicity with which the scholar and theologian explains elementary truths and ordinary rules of church discipline to a House of Commons who certainly stood in need of instruction in such matters. The Bishop, when his part was done, and he had received notice to prepare for trial on a day appointed, put his manuscript, with an injunction of secresy, into the hands of a lawyer who was supposed to be friendly, that he might give his advice on the technical and legal parts. 1 The person,' says the ' Parentalia,' ' thus intrusted dis- covering (on the perusal) matters of such moment, as he conceived might be very expedient for the Prosecutors to be forewarned of, betrayed his trust, and to ingratiate himself treacherously delivered up the Bishop's papers to the chief persons in power of the governing faction. The consequence thereupon was that the resolution which had been taken to bring him to trial for life was suddenly counter- manded and an order by the House of Commons made to continue him in prison during their pleasure.' So began the long years of Bishop Wren's captivity. Few trials could have been harder for a man of vigorous GARTER JEWELS. 67 active nature to bear than this one which rendered him powerless, when all he held dear was at stake, loaded him with calumnies and prevented his uttering a word in his defence. The diary gives no hint of what his feelings were. In silence he resigned himself, resolved to afford no triumph to his enemies. Dean Wren was somewhat better off, though he had his share of mis- fortunes. The valuable plate and treasures belonging to the Order of the Garter were a serious responsibility, and, though the treasure-house was strong, he could not feel that it offered a sufficient security. The plate and armour were not easily hidden, but the Diamond George and Garter of Gustavus Adolphus he deter- mined, if possible, to save. Accordingly, with the help of one trustworthy person and every precaution for secresy, he dug a hole in the treasury floor and there deposited them, concealing the place with the utmost care, and leaving a note in the hand of one worthy person intimating where the jewels might be found in the event of his death. He had good cause to rejoice in this precaution, for a few months later, in October 1642, down came ' one Captain Fogg pretending a warrant from the King and demanding the keys of the Treasury, threatening if they were denied him by the Dean and Prebendaries, to pull the Chapel about their ears.' As his threats had no effect, he forced the stone jambs of the doorway with crowbars, and carried off all the treasures except those which the Dean had F 2 68 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. buried. These, however, did not long remain secure, for in 1645 they were discovered and placed in the keeping of Colonel Ven, then governor of Windsor Castle, and finally, through several hands, reached the trustees of the Long Parliament, who sold the jewels to Thomas Beauchamp, their clerk. The Deanery was not spared during the first pillage of the chapel, though the Dean possessed a formal protection from the Committee of Public Safety, but was ransacked by the soldiers, and the Registry of the Garter, sealed by order of the House of Lords, broken open, and the re- cords stolen. Dean Wren lost many things of value books and manuscripts dear to the careful scholar, and also plate, including two large silver tankards, the gifts of the Elector Palatine. Of his own effects the Dean was only able, after an interval of six years, to recover one harpsichord valued at ten pounds ; but he suc- ceeded, after much expense and frequent attendances at Somerset House, by the favour of the trustees' chair- man, Major Wither, in regaining the registers of the Order of the Garter, known from the colours of the velvet in which they were bound as ' the Black, the Blue, and the Red,' though not until a considerable space of time had passed; they contained all the principal records of the Order, and were therefore very valuable. The diamonds however, he was never able to regain, or the Altar Plate. After the first plunder of the Chapel and the Deanery Dr. Wren appears to have left Windsor and to have followed the Court for a time. Christopher, meanwhile, was at Westminster ad- vancing steadily in learning, while the loyal prin- INCREASING TROUBLES. 69 ciples of his family must have been confirmed by the whole tone of the school which was ardently royalist, South, in a sermon for January 30, says, 1 speaking of Westminster : ' Upon that very Day, that black and eternally infamous Day of the King's murder, I myself heard, and am now a witness, that the King was pub- lickly prayed for in this School but an hour or two (at most) before his sacred head was struck off.' Whether at this period Christopher ever saw his uncle in the Tower does not appear. The Bishop's position was sad enough. During 1643 and 1644 his diary records the death of five of his children ; in the monotony of his prison life these sorrows must have pressed on him with double force. Nor was there any consolation to be derived from public matters. The royal cause, prosperous at first, grew less and less so, as the King's lack of money became an ever-increasing diffi- culty. Another grief, keenly felt by all Churchmen, was the order of the Parliament for the abolition of the Prayer Book and the alteration of the Thirty-nine Articles in a sense pleasing to the Puritans. Then came the long-deferred trial of the Archbishop of Canterbury. He was treated with a cruel disregard of his high position and of his age, every kind of insult and indignity being offered him. He however rose superior to it all, and defended himself with an elo- quence, vigour, and courage which dismayed and en- raged his enemies, though it could not change their purpose. The Bishop of Ely's name was frequently mentioned, and his promotion objected to as one of the 1 South's Sermons, vol. v. p. 45, ed. 1727. jo S/X CHRISTOPHER Archbishop's crimes ; but no further steps were taken against him then, as he was safe in custody, and the Commons had enough on their hands. In his defence, the Archbishop thought it prudent to say nothing respecting the Bishops whose advance- ment was objected against him, deeming it for their interest to entangle them as little as possible in his misfortunes. They were able to speak for themselves he said, but the memory of the dead Archbishop Neile he warmly defended. The trial was long pro- tracted in order to give a specious colouring of justice to the predetermined sentence. For this Prynne ' kept a school of instruction ' for the witnesses, and tampered with the Archbishop's papers, of which he had forcibly possessed himself. The spirit that guided the whole trial was shown in his reply to one who said the Archbishop was a good man. ' Yea, but we must make him ill.' The Peers raised a feeble opposition. The King, whose consent the Parliament had not attempted to procure, sent to the Archbishop by a sure hand, from Oxford, a full pardon under the Great Seal, but neither received the least attention. On January 10, on Tower Hill, the unjust sentence was fulfilled. Few things are more touching than the account given by his chaplain and biographer, Heylin, of the way in which the Archbishop met that cruel fate. It is some comfort to remember that, though the Church Services were then forbidden, yet his enemies did not interfere, but suffered the Burial Service to be read in All Hallows, Barking, where he was first ARCHBISHOP LAUD MURDERED. 71 interred. After the Restoration, the coffin was removed to S. John's College, Oxford, and buried under the altar in the chapel. He left Bishop Wren and Dr. Duppa, Bishop of Salisbury, executors of his will. It contained a great number of bequests for charitable foundations, especially for his native town of Reading ; but as his whole estate had been taken from him, these were unfulfilled. His murder was an immense triumph to all the Sectarians in England and Scotland, who probably considered it as a death-blow to the Church. The Bishop of Ely in his cell must have listened in grief and horror to the tolling of the Tower bell which proclaimed the bloody death of the friend with whom he had laboured for many years, latterly his patient fellow-prisoner. The entry in the diary is brief : ' Parce, O Deus Requisitor sanguinis.' The same fate seemed very near to himself, and he was ready to follow the Archbishop ; but he had eighteen years of close imprisonment to endure, and a different work to do. Early in 1644, George Monk, then a colonel in the King's service, was taken prisoner by Fairfax in his attack upon the army besieging Nantwich, in Cheshire. He was imprisoned first at Hull, and then, as he was thought too important to be exchanged except for some considerable prisoner, he was sent to the Tower, and there remained two years. The Tower charges were high, and a long confinement in its walls was a strain upon the resources of a prisoner, which reduced those, whose fortune, like that of Monk, was scanty, 72 S/K CHRISTOPHER WREN. to extreme poverty. The King, who knew Monk's condition, contrived to send him a hundred guineas, and upon this he existed for some time, and resisted the offers of Cromwell, then rapidly rising in power and authority. Somehow or other, Monk contrived to obtain several interviews with Bishop Wren, who did his best to confirm the soldier in his loyalty. He per- ceived that Monk, whose popularity with the army was very great, and whose military talents were thought to be of a high order, might one day be a valuable ally, and a useful counterpoise to Cromwell. At length, when the King's cause appeared for the time lost, and Monk himself was reduced to extreme poverty, he yielded to Cromwell's request, and ac- cepted a commission in the Irish army, under his kinsman Lord Lisle. Before his release, Monk had a final interview with the Bishop of Ely, and, as he knelt to ask the Bishop's blessing, bound himself with a solemn engagement never to be an enemy to his king, and said he was going to do his majesty the best service he could against 'the rebels in Ireland, and hoped he should one day do him further service in England.' Bishop Wren held firmly to his trust in Monk's loyalty, though many things might well have shaken his confidence. In the curious life of Dr. John Bar- wick, one of the King's most faithful agents, from whom Sir Walter Scott may have taken many of the features of his indefatigable plotter ' Dr. Rochecliffe,' it is said that 1 'he' (Dr. Barwick) 'often heard the 1 Life of Dr. Barwick, p. 267, ed. 1724. CHRISTOPHER AT OXFORD. 73 Right Reverend Bishop of Ely promise himself all he could wish from the General's fidelity.' As Monk gave no other hint of his intentions, refusing even to receive Charles II.'s letters, this assurance was precious to the Royalists. In 1646, Christopher Wren left Westminster, and at the age of fourteen went up to Oxford, and was entered as a Gentleman Commoner at Wadham College. He had, young as he was, distinguished himself at Westminster, inventing an astronomical instrument, of which no description remains, and dedicating it to his father in a short Latin poem, 1 which has been often praised for the flow and smooth- ness of its lines ; a set of Latin verses in which the signs of the Zodiac are transformed into Christian emblems, is, in spite of its ingenuity, much less successful ; a short poem on the Nativity also in Latin, belongs probably to the same date, and is of the same order of poetry. Far more graceful are the playful lines cut on the rind of an immense pomegranate sent to ' that best man, my dearest friend E. F., by Christopher Regulus/ in which on the ' Pomo Punico,' as he calls it, Christopher rings the changes on ' Punic gifts ' and ' Punic faith,' and declares his pomegranate is connected neither with the one nor the other. One English poem, an attempt to paraphrase the first chapter of S. John's Gospel, fails of necessity from the impossibility of such an attempt, and Wren handles the English verse far more stiffly and uneasily than he did the Latin. What however is striking is the pen- 1 See Appendix L 74 MX CHRISTOPHER WREN. manship of the ' Parentalia ' autograph ; the writing, the capital letters, and the little flourishes are executed with a delicate finish really remarkable. There is no date to this autograph, but the hand- writing appears firmer and more regular than that of the dedication to his father, and it was probably an Oxford composition. Christopher came up to Ozford a slight, delicate boy, with an understanding at once singularly quick and patient, readily seconded by very dexterous fin- gers, and keen powers of observation. He brought with him a reputation for, in the phrase of the day, ' uncommon parts,' and speedily showed that besides a classical education, he had acquired a strong bent for the experimental philosophy of the ' New learning.' Oxford, when Wren came there, was not only the seat of learning, it was a Court and a Camp as well, to which all the Royalist hearts in England turned. In the midst of these curiously differing influences, Chris- topher pursued his studies under the care of the ' most obliging and universally curious Dr. Wilkins, 1 1 as Evelyn calls him, a man as devoted to experiments as Christopher himself. Dean Wren had been in Bristol with his daughter and son-in-law, accompany- 1 Dr. Wilkins published a book (A Discovery of a New World), concerning the art of flying, in which he said he did not question but in the next age it will be as usual to hear a man call for his wings when he is going a journey, as it is now to call for his boots. The Duchess of Newcastle objecting to Dr. Wilkins the want of baiting places on the way to his New World, he expressed his surprise that the objection should be made by a lady who had all her life been employed in building castles in the air. (The Guardian, No. 112. Addison.) This scheme does not seem to have reached the length of an experiment ! KING CHARLES LEAVES OXFORD. 75 ing Prince Rupert, and on the Prince's unexpected surrender of the town to Fairfax (1645), seems to have returned with Prince Rupert and Mr. and Mrs. Holder, either to his own living of Great Haseley, or to Mr. Holder's at Bletchingdon. In those times no place could long be a tranquil habitation. The King's affairs went from bad to worse, and at length the near approach of Fairfax with his victorious army made it evident that Oxford could no longer be a safe refuge for the Court. King Charles accordingly left Oxford in disguise, and, at- tended only by Mr. Ashburnham and Dr. Michael Hudson, 1 who was well acquainted with the lanes and byeways of the country, proceeded by Henley-on- Thames and St. Albans, to Southwell in Nottingham- shire, throwing himself on the loyalty of the Scots, then encamped at Newark. How unworthy of his con- fidence they proved to be, and how they finally sold him to the Parliament, are matters of history too notorious for repetition here. Oxford, thus saved from the ruin of a siege, capi- tulated to Fairfax June 24, 1646, on the express con- dition that the University should be free from ' seques- trations, fines, taxes and all other molestations what- soever.' But the Parliament was not famous for keep- ing its engagements, and at once proceeded to break through those made with Oxford and reduce it to the same condition as Cambridge, which they had devas- 1 A most zealous Royalist ; King Charles called him ' my plain- dealing chaplain,' because Dr. Hudson told him the truth when others would not. He was murdered at Woodcroft House, Northamptonshire, 1648. Desiderata Curiosa, p. 378. Peck. 76 5//? CHRISTOPHER WREN. tated in 1642. A passage from ' Querela Cantabri- giensis,' which is supposed to be written by Dr. Barwick, gives some idea of what this condition was : ' And therefore,' he says, 'if posterity shall ask "Who thrust out one of the eyes of this kingdom, who made Eloquence dumb, Philosophy sottish, widowed the Arts, and drove the Muses from their ancient habitation ? Who plucked th^ reverend and orthodox professors out of their chairs, and silenced them in prison or their graves ? Who turned Religion into Rebellion, and changed the apostolical chair into a desk for blasphemy, and tore the garland from the head of Learning to place it on the dull brows of disloyal ignorance?" If they shall ask " Who made those ancient and beautiful chapels, the sweet remembrances and monuments of our fore- fathers' charity and the kind fomenters of their children's devotion, to become ruinous heaps of dust and stones ? " . . . 'Tis quickly answered " Those they were, who endeavouring to share three Crowns and put them in their own pockets, have transformed this free kingdom into a large gaol, to keep the liberty of tJie subject', they who maintain 100,000 robbers and murderers by sea and land, to protect our lives and the propriety of our goods. . . . they who have possessed themselves of his majesty's towns, navy, and magazines, to make him a glorious king; who have multiplied oaths, protestations, vows, leagues and covenants, for ease of tender consciences ; filling all pulpits with jugglers for the Cause, canting sedition, atheism, and rebellion, to root out popery PHILOSOPHICAL MEETINGS. 77 and Babylon and settle the kingdom of Christ : . . . The very same have stopped the mouth of all learn- ing (following herein the example of their elder brother the Turk), lest any should be wiser than themselves, or posterity know what a world of wickedness they have committed. " ' x Wadham College probably suffered less than many, as its head, Dr. Wilkins, who had married Cromwell's sister, was very submissive to the then Government. As matters settled down somewhat at Oxford towards 1648, Dr. Wilkins, Dr. Jonathan Goddard, Dr. Wallis, Mr. Theodore Hank, who came from the desolated Palatinate, and Mr. S. Foster, the Gresham Professor of Astronomy, met together weekly, ' to discourse and consider,' writes Dr. Wallis, ' (precluding theology and state affairs), of philosophical enquiries, and such as related thereunto : as physick, anatomy, geometry, astronomy, navigation, staticks, magneticks, chymicks, mechanicks, and natural experiments with the state of those studies as then calculated at home and abroad.' The meetings, at which Christopher Wren, young as he was, appears to have been a constant attendant, were frequently held at the house of Dr. Goddard for the convenience of his having there a workman skilled in the nice work of grinding glasses for microscopes and telescopes. Dr. Goddard became body physician to Cromwell, was by him made Warden of Merton College, Oxford, and subsequently represented the university in Parliament. Dr. Wallis, a famous Oxford 1 Annals of England, p. 432. 7 8 S/X CHRISTOPHER WREN. mathematician, was employed by the Parliament to decipher the King's cabinet of letters taken at Naseby, and also was proved by Matthew Wren, the son of the Bishop, to have deciphered several very important letters sent by Charles II. to England, and intercepted at Dunkirk. As by degrees these meetings were more largely attended, and men came who held very different opinions from those of Dr. Goddard and Dr. Wallis, the exclusion of theology and politics from the discus- sions was a needful precaution. Many inventions of Christopher's date from this time, a design for a re- flecting dial for the ceiling of a room, ornamented with quaint figures and devices, some Latin lines ending in a chronogram of his age, and the date of the invention, suggested probably by the one in the rectory at East Knoyle, which he had known from a child ; an instru- ment to write in the dark ; and an instrument of use in gnomonics. 1 At the same time he had attracted the notice of Sir Charles Scarborough, a friend of Dean Wren's, then just rising to fame as a surgeon. Chris- topher, whose health, as has been said, was delicate, fell dangerously ill and considered that he owed his life to the skilful care of his new friend. Dr. Scar- borough, who could recite in order all the propositions of Euclid and Archimedes, and could apply them, found in his patient a kindred spirit, and induced Wren, young as he was, to undertake the translation into Latin of the ' Clavis Aurea,' by the Rev. W. Oughtred, a mathematical treatise of great reputation. 1 i.e. the art of dial-making. MR. OUGHTRED. 79 That Christopher was able to satisfy the old man is evident from the preface, even while making allow- ance for the complimentary style of the time. Mr. Oughtred speaks of ' Mr. Christopher Wren, Gentleman Commoner of Wadham College, a youth generally admired for his talents, who, when not yet sixteen years old, enriched astronomy, gnomonics, statics and mechanics, by brilliant inventions, and from that time has continued to enrich them, and in truth is one from whom I can, not vainly, look for great things.' l Mr. Oughtred was a Canon of Chichester, and after the siege of the city and the wanton sack of the cathedral by Sir E. Waller in 1642, deprived and heart-broken, wandered to Oxford, refusing the offers of home and emolument which came to him from France, Italy, and Holland. He gladly availed him- self of young Wren's services in the work of transla- tion, which he had not energy to undertake himself, and waited, hoping for better times. When at length they drew near, and he heard of the vote passed at Westminster (May i, 1660), for the Restoration of the Royal Family, the relief was too great, and Mr. Oughtred 'expired in a sudden ecstasy of joy.' 2 Dean Wren, in the meanwhile, though deprived of his living, does not seem to have been in any personal danger, having a protection from Parliament, possibly obtained by his friend the Elector Palatine, or Speaker Lenthall, by favour of which he boldly attended the 1 Lives of the Gresham Professors. Ward, p. 96. 2 Memorials of the See of Chichester, p. 290. 8o S/X CHRISTOPHER WREN. Committee Meetings at Somerset House. He made an attempt to gather together the Knights of the Garter, and addressed the following petition, an auto- graph copy of which is contained in the ' Parentalia ' : ' To ye Right Honble ye Knights of ye Most Noble Order of ye Garter. 1 Dr. C. Wren Register and Secretarye of ye sd Most Noble Order of ye Garter in discharge of his sworne service. ' Prayeth, that according to ye commission directed to all ye Honble Peers of ye said Most Noble Order or to any Three of them [to muster and consult in ye absence of ye Sovraine upon all such emergent occasions as may concerne ye ad- vancement or indemnity of ye said Most Noble Order] ' It may therefore please your Honors to give yr. consent for some sett Time and Place of meeting with such convenient speed as may best stand with ye great Affairs. That yr. humble Servant ye Register may Represent to yr. Honors some few Things, w ch hee humbly conceaves may much concerne ye Honor & Interest of ys. Most Honble Order to bee provided for.' ' I delivered this Petition in ye Parliament Howse before they sate, Jan. 23d. 1647.' (O. S.) A copy of this Petition he sent to the Deputy Chancellor. It would seem to have startled the Knights, and Dr. Wren evidently wishes the way smoothed. His letter, also an autograph, is headed GOD'S PRISONER. 81 ' Copye of my letter sent to the Deputie Chancelor for removal of some scruples w ch arose among ye Knights of ye Order before ye Time of their meeting in Council.' ' Honble Chancelor. I have no pticular aime in this my humble suite to ye Lords of ye Order to propose any private or Personal Interest of my owne, or any other man's, much lesse to engage their Honors in anything that may seeme to contest w th or dissent from ye Highe Court of Parliament wherein they now sit & from whence I am not ignorant ye Most Honble Society of ye Most Noble Order receaved as at first Life and Being soe now holds its establishment. My humble & earnest desires, are to represent such Things only as I humbly conceave may nearly concerne ye Honor & Interests of their Most Noble Order. To w ch (next as yr. Selfe Honored Sir) I am by oath obliged : (to preserve ye Honor thereof, & of all in itt to my utmost Power) For zeale of this duty w ch upon ye intimation of what I here profess, I presume they will not reject, I beseech you to give y m this assurance as yf itt were from ye tender of my owne mouthe, who am at this period God's Prisoner, & under Him, ' Yr servant, C. W.' Whether the Dean succeeded in gathering the Knights together, and what the 'Things nearly con- cerning their Honor ' may have been if they were not, G 82 S7K CHRISTOPHER WREN. as the letter implies they were not, the King's de- liverance, the ' Parentalia ' does not say, neither does it give any hint of the illness to which the end of the Dean's letter appears to point. CHAPTER IV. 1646-1658. DEATH OF MRS. M. WREN KING CHARLES MURDERED A MONO- TONOUS WALK INVENTIONS A DREAM ALL SOULS' FELLOWSHIP BEGINNINGS OF ROYAL SOCIETY ASTRONOMY AN OFFER OF RELEASE THE CYCLOID CROMWELL'S FUNERAL LETTERS FROM LONDON. G 2 La Royaut seule, depuis vingt ans, n'avait pas 6t6 mise a I'dpreuve ; seule elle avail encore a faire des promesses auxquelles on n'eut pas \.& trompd. . . . On y revenait enfin, apres tant d'agitations comme au toit paternel qu'a fait quitter 1'espdrance et ou ramene la fatigue. Monk, par M. Guizot, p. 69. CHAPTER IV. A HEAVY sorrow fell upon the imprisoned Bishop of Ely at the close of 1646. His wife was worn out by grief for the loss of her children and anxiety for her husband, for whom Laud's fate seemed but too pro- bable, and the Bishop's diary records that on ' De- cember 8, 1646, Ad Christum evolavit pia anima conjugis E. media post 5 vum matutinam.' l The diary contains no remark, no murmur, though this loss left Bishop Wren very desolate and full of anxiety for his seven surviving children, of whom the eldest, Matthew, was but seventeen. Upon such troubles as these prison life must have pressed heavily, and if Bishop Wren's captivity was half as strict as was that of Dr. John Barwick, who was consigned to the Tower in i65o, 2 it was a sufficient hardship. Every rumour which reached his ears from the tumultuous world outside must have added to his grief. The King's affairs grew more desperate, and the shadow of Cromwell loomed larger and larger. Probably the Bishop did not expect a long captivity. It must have come to his ears that in the proposed treaty of Newport (1648), ' the persons only who were to expect no pardon 1 ' December 8, 1646. The pious soul of my wife Eliza flew up to Christ at half-past five in the morning.' 2 Life of Dr. Barwick, ed. 1724, p. 122. 86 SfR CHRISTOPHER WREN. were the Princes Rupert and Maurice; James, Earl of Derby; John, Earl of Bristol; William, Earl of New- castle ; Francis, Lord Cottington; George, Lord Digby ; Matthew Wren, Bishop of Ely,' and some fifty others. 1 Condemned thus without a trial, without a chance of his vindication being known, the Bishop betook him- self to prayer, and to writing a commentary on the Holy Scriptures, a task for which, as a fine Hebrew, Greek and Latin scholar, he was well qualified. In this work he found solace and support, and quietly waited until the tyranny should be overpast. There is no need to recall in detail the thickcoming sorrows of that time ; it is but too easy to guess how doubly galling imprisonment must have been to Bishop Wren when the royalists who were at liberty were straining every nerve, exhausting every device to save if possible their beloved King from his fate. In vain at length came the fatal January 30 (1649), and King Charles, attended by Bishop Juxon, walked to the scaffold and uttered his final words, ' I have a good cause and a gracious God on my side ; I go from a corruptible to an incorruptible Crown where no dis- turbance can be, no disturbance in the world.' There was one of the King's loyal subjects who, we may well believe, envied Bishop Juxon his privilege of attendance on his master to the last Bishop Wren, who had been with him in bright early days, had attended him when Prince of Wales, on his romantic journey to Spain, and, when the weight of the corruptible crown first came 1 Grey's Examination of Neale's History of the Puritans^ vol. iii. P- 333- A MONOTONOUS WALK. 87 upon the prince's head, had accompanied him on the journey to Scotland for his coronation at Scone, who ever since then had been so trusted by him. No word of his own grief, of his unavailing longing to see his King once more, and once more kiss his hand, is expressed in the brief record in his diary. It is simply ' A sanguinibus, O Deus ! ' Horror at the crime, at the stain of innocent blood which now denied his country, seems to have swallowed up all expression of personal feeling. By degrees the rigour of his imprisonment appears to have been a little relaxed, and by the connivance of his gaoler he obtained the opportunity, rarely granted to prisoners, of walking upon the leads of one of the towers. Thither he daily went for his exercise, and, says the writer of the ' Parentalia,' ' by a just computation, he walked round the world. The earth being affirmed to be 216,000 miles in compass (at a calculation of sixty miles to a degree) ; l if it were possible to make a path round the earth, an able footman going constantly twenty-four miles a day, would compass it in 900 days, and so on in proportion of time and miles.' It would seem that the Bishop, finding his life was for the time spared, and having a steady conviction that the evil days would pass, had determined to keep himself ready in body, as in soul, for what work the future might bring. A prison life leaves little to be recorded ; the days wore away in the Tower, divided between devotion, study, and that unchanging monoto- 1 It is really 24,899 miles. 88 SfX CHRISTOPHER WREN. nous walk which at least gave the prisoner a distant glimpse of the world from which he was excluded. He was allowed the Bible and paper and ink, but no other books. It is the testimony of one who has studied Bishop Wren's manuscript ' He wrote in an exquisite hand, in very fair Latin, a commentary on much of Holy Scripture enough to fill an oak box of no mean dimensions. This box he committed to the care of Dr. Beaumont, master of S. Peter's College. 1 Had the Puritans read the MS. they would have found some antidote to their poison/ Two sermons and some treatises were also written during his captivity. Probably suspicion attached to anything that he did, for it is said to have been all written by stealth. His nephew's life differed as widely from his own as did their characters. Christopher was at Oxford, deep in the experiments of the ' New learning,' and in the inventions which it suggested to his ready brain and dexterous fingers. One invention which he was at the time proud of was that of a ' diplographic instrument for writing with two pens/ whose uses he thus describes ; ' by the help of this instrument, every ordinary penman may at all times be suddenly fitted to write two several copies of any deeds and evidences, from the shortest to the longest 1 The box is, I believe, in Peterhouse Library to this day, but a portion of the Commentary was published as a treatise against the Socinians by the Bishop's son Matthew, under the title of Increpatio Bar Jcsu, sive polemicae adsectiones locorum aliquot S. Scripturae ab imposturts pervcrsis in Catechesis Racoviana collectae. DIPLOGRAPHIC PEN. 89 length of lines, in the very same compass of time, and with as much ease and beauty, without any dividing or ruling ; as, without the help of the instrument, he could have despatched but one.' So successful was this instrument, that he obtained a patent for it for seventeen years. In the same year an exact duplicate of this invention was brought from France, and another patent taken out for the same number of years, by Mr. William Petty, 1 who claimed to be the inventor. Wren was indignant at the notion that he had copied another person's idea, and gives good reasons for his belief that his own instrument had been de- scribed to Petty by a friend of his. Three years later Wren wrote of it as ' an obvious Thing, a cast-off Toy ; ' ending, ' Indeed though I care not for having a Suc- cessor in Invention, yet it behoves me to vindicate my- self from the Aspersion of having a Predecessor.' Another invention Wren describes as a ' weather clock.' It consisted of a clock affixed to a weather cock that moved a rundle covered with paper, upon 1 Petty's history is a curious one. The son of a clothier of Rumsey ; he educated himself; was some years in the navy; became Gresham professor of music ; then a physician of some fame ; was also Henry Cromwell's secretary ; was a commissioner for Ireland, and married Sir Hardress Waller's daughter. Soon after the Restoration he was knighted by Charles II. Petty invented a ' double-bottomed ship to sail against wind and tide ; it was flat-bottomed, had two distinct keels cramped to- gether with huge timbers, so as a violent stream run between : it bore a monstrous broad sail.' It excited much interest at the time, made one very successful voyage, and was afterwards wrecked in a frightful storm. Its model is still preserved at the Royal Society, of which he became a member. He died in 1687. Lives of the Gresham Professors, p. 217. Ward. See also Evelyn's Diary of March 22, 1675, for an interesting ccount of Petty's career. 90 57A' CHRISTOPHER WREN. which the clock moved a black-lead pencil, so that the observer, by the traces of the pencil on the paper, might certainly conclude what winds had blown in his absence for twelve hours' space. The ' Parentalia ' contains a careful drawing in pen and sepia of this in- vention elaborately worked out and remarkable for the truth and finish of the drawing. Some of these designs, and an instrument for sowing corn, nearly identical with a modern 'drill,' he dedicated in a quaintly formal letter to his father's friend, the Prince Palatine. He appeared before the Prince in another character, due probably to his Westminster training. A play was performed (about 1652) at Oxford before the Prince, Dr. Seth Ward, 1 and several others, entitled ' Hey for Honesty, down with Knavery,' translated by Thomas Randolph from the Plutus of Aristophanes, in which Christopher sustained the part of Neanias. 2 It is provoking to have this bare record merely, and no clue as to the success or failure of any part of the 1 Seth Ward, born 1617. Was Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford and an active member of the Royal Society. Afterwards Bishop of Exeter and then of Salisbury ; died 1689. 2 Life of Sir C. Wren, by J. Elmes, p. 12. The full title of the play was ' nXouro<#oX/iia nXouroya/ii'a,' a pleasant comedy intituled Hey for Honesty, &c., augmented and published by F. J. A copy, published in 1651, and containing a MS. note saying that Wren took the part of 1 Neanias Adolescens,' was in the possession of Isaac Reed, a commentator on Shakespeare and a great book collector, who died in 1807. His epitaph (given in Notes and Queries, series v., xiii. p. 304) was as follows : ' Reader of these few lines take heed, And mend your ways for my sake ; For you must die like Isaac Reed, Tho' you read till your eyes ache.' T. Randolph was a friend and pupil of Ben Jonson's ; he published The Muses' Looking Glass, which satirised the Puritans ; died 1634. BATTLE OF WORCESTER. 91 performance, especially where the young actor was concerned. To about the same date belongs a Latin letter written by Christopher to his father, signed ' Christo- phorus Regulus,' describing in glowing terms a visit paid in the spring to a friend's house. Some pretty touches give ' the lofty woods with their clamorous re- public of rooks, the great fountains, the placid pools without, you might say a terrestrial paradise, but with- in, heaven itself.' It may have been, though there is nothing in its favour but conjecture, that this was Bletchingdon House, and that among ' the virgins sing- ing holy psalms,' whom he mentions, was his future bride Faith, (or as she spelt it, ' ffaith ') Coghill. The letter says much, as does all that passed between them, for the warm affection existing between father and son, and the sincerely religious tone of Christopher's mind. The desperate efforts of the Royalists shortly after this period to overthrow Cromwell's tyranny and to put Charles II. on the throne, received a cruel check in the disastrous battle of Worcester (1651), Cromwell's ' crowning mercy.' This crushed the hopes of the Royalists and obliged them to turn their every effort and thought to effecting the escape of their prince. He must have passed very near Knoyle Hill, when he crossed Salisbury Plain and met at Stonehenge the friends who at last succeeded in conveying him to the coast. Knoyle Hill had its own fugitive to shelter. Aubrey, the Wiltshire Antiquary, gives the account of a vivid dream which Christopher Wren had, when 92 .S7/? CHRISTOPHER WREN. staying, in the autumn of 1651, with Dean Wren at Knoyle. He ' dreamed he saw a fight in a great market-place, which he knew not, where some were flying and others pursuing ; and among those who fled, he saw a kinsman of his, who went into Scotland with the King's army. They heard in the country that the King was come into England, but whereabouts he was they could not tell. The next night came his kinsman to Knoyle Hill, and brought with him the disastrous news of Charles I I.'s defeat at Worcester.' x It seems likely that this ' kinsman ' was Bishop Wren's son Matthew, who afterwards went to the Hague. There also, when his escape had been with great difficulty contrived, went King Charles, as his brother- in-law, the Prince of Orange, was his steady friend. In the hope of utterly putting down the Cavaliers, the greatest severity was shown at this time to all who had helped the King, and even to those who merely boasted of their good will towards him. Among those who suffered was Inigo Jones, who had been architect to. James I. and to Charles I., had been steadily loyal to the Stuarts, and was therefore an object of suspicion. He lived to see what was thought the utter downfall of the monarchy, and following upon this the desecra- tion and ruin of the finest churches in England. S. Paul's, on which he had spent much labour and skill, was, as being connected with Archbishop Laud, an object of special hatred to the Puritans. It suffered 1 Miscellanies, ed. 1696. MAKING HIMSELF. 93 every possible injury. The fine portico designed by Inigo Jones was filled with stalls, blocked up by booths, and used as a market-place. The. year after the battle of Worcester, Inigo Jones died, poor and lonely, in a lodging close to the defaced cathedral. He and Christopher Wren must probably have met. Wren had a sincere admiration for his predecessor's skill, and spoke of the S. Paul's portico as 'an exquisite piece in itself.' In the autumn of 1653, Wren, then just twenty-one, was elected to a fellowship at All Souls, and happy in the comparative tranquillity of Oxford, pursued the various studies which he loved. All this time he was ' making himself,' as was said of Sir Walter Scott in his childhood on the Scotch hills, though perhaps at the time no one could have guessed the particular manner in which he would distinguish himself. In the following summer he made acquaintance with John Evelyn, who had come up to Oxford to hear the ' Philosophy Act.' Evelyn mentioned that after a dinner at All Souls he ' visited that miracle of a youth Mr. Christopher Wren, nephew to the Bishop of Ely.' l ' A day or two later Evelyn dined with ' that most obliging and universally curious Dr. Wilkins at Wadham College, who showed him his " transparent apiaries, built like castles, and so ordered one upon another as one might take the honey without hurt- ing the bees," his " hollow statue, which gave a voice 1 Diary, July 13, 1654. 94 MX CHRISTOPHER WREN. and uttered words, by a long, concealed pipe that went to its mouth, whilst one speaks through it at good distance ; " and his gallery filled with mathe- matical and other curiosities ; a " thermometer," still a curiosity, though fifty-two years had elapsed since Galileo invented the first ; a " way-wiser," which, when placed in a coach, exactly measured the miles it travelled, and showed them by an index ; " a monstrous magnet," and many other inventions, most of them of his owne and that prodigious young scholar, Mr. Christopher Wren, who presented me with a piece of white marble which he had stained with a lively red very deepe, as beautiful as if it had been natural.' The acquaintance thus made with Christopher Wren ripened into a friendship lasting until Evelyn's death in 1706. Dr. Wilkins was also of Evelyn's friends, though he was very submissive to Cromwell. 1 It is curious to contrast two accounts which occur in the same page of Evelyn's diary. 1 December 25, 1655. There was no more notice taken of Christmas Day in churches. I went to London, where Dr. Wild preached the funeral sermon of Preaching, this being the last day, after which Cromwell's proclamation was to take place, that none of the Church of England should dare either to preach or administer Sacraments, teach schoole etc. on paine of imprisonment or exile. So this was the mournfullest day that in my life I had scene, or 1 Prcesul. Ang., p. 779. Godwin. GERM OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY. 95 the Church of England herselfe since the Reforma- tion ; to the greate rejoicing of both Papist and Presbyter. So pathetic was his discourse (on 2 Cor. xiii. 9) that it drew many teares from the auditory. Myself, wife, and some of our family received the Communion ; God make me thankfull that hath hitherto provided for us the food of our soules as well as bodies ! The Lord Jesus pity our distressed Church, and bring back the captivity of Sion ! ' February 10, 1656. I heard Dr. Wilkins preach before the Lord Mayor in S. Paul's, shewing how obedience was preferable to sacrifice. He was a most obliging person, who had married the Protector's sister, and tooke greate paines to preserve the Uni- versities from the ignorant sacrilegious commanders and souldiers, who would faine have demolished all places and persons that pretended to learning.' Dr. Wilkins appears, like too many of that time, to have regarded the Church as utterly overthrown, and probably believed honestly in his peculiar interpre- tation of the text upon which he preached. Much credit is however due to him for the idea of the Oxford meetings, and for the hospitality which he showed. These meetings were the germ of the Royal Society, and to them Dr. Thomas Sprat (afterwards Bishop of Rochester), a great friend of Christopher Wren's, bears testimony : ' Wadham College,' l he says, ' was then the place of resort for virtuous and learned men. Their first 1 Hist, of Royal Society. Bishop Sprat, ed. 1722, p. 53. 96 MX CHRISTOPHER WREN. purpose was no more than only the satisfaction of breathing a freer air, and of conversing in quiet, one with another, without being engaged in the passions and madness of that dismal age. And from the institution of that assembly it had been enough if no other advantage had come but this ; that by these means there was a race of young men provided against the next age, whose minds receiving from them their first impressions of sober and generous knowledge, were invincibly armed against all the enchantments of enthusiasm. ... It was in good measure by the influence which these gentlemen had over the rest, that the university itself, or at least any part of its discipline and order, was saved from ruin. . . . Nor indeed could it be otherwise, for such spiritual frenzies, which did then bear rule, can never stand long before a clear and deep skill in nature. It is almost impossible, that they who con- verse much with the subtilty of things, should be deluded by such thick deceits. There is but one better charm in the world than real philosophy, to allay the impulses of the false spirit, and that is the blessed Presence and assistance of the True.' In 1656, on the 2Qth of May, Dean Wren died. Sorrow and anxiety, the desolation of the Church, the apparent ruin of the monarchy, had worn out his gentle spirit ; and probably little thinking how great a change was approaching to free the country, he passed away, aged 69, at the house of his son-in-law, Mr. Holder, and was buried in the chancel of Bletchingdon Church. 1 1 l Dr. Christopher Wren, Deane of Windsor, was buried June 3, ASTRONOMY PROFESSORSHIP. 97 When we look back to the years of the Rebellion, their darkness is lightened for us by the knowledge that the Restoration came at last, and it is difficult to realise fully how the times appeared to those who actually lived in them, to whom the years brought only fresh losses and sorrows, and the sickness of hope deferred. Knowing how, on the 2 9th of May, but four years later, all England was welcoming back the King to ' enjoy his own again/ one can hardly forbear wishing that Dean Wren might have been spared to see that day ; yet those who loved him best cannot have grudged him the fulness of that peace which all his life he had desired, and which he had invoked upon his first home. Christopher was very warmly attached to his father, as all his letters show, and must have grieved greatly for his death. Soon after this he was summoned to London. The Gresham professor of astronomy, Mr. Laurence Rooke, retired in 1657, and the chair was offered to Wren. He was but twenty-four and doubted whether he should accept such a post while so young, and he clung to Oxford and his studies there. The friends whom he consulted advised him differently ; accordingly he came up to London and delivered his opening address to a considerable audience. It was in Latin, and after a brief apology for his youth passed into a sketch of the history of astronomy. He dwells on the great riches of the science, how it is the handmaid of theology, the queen 1656,' is the entry in the register ; there does not appear to be any monument or brass to his memory. The Parentalia and Elmes's Life give 1658, but the dates are frequently inaccurate in both books. H 98 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. of sciences, speaks of the vast discoveries made by its means, touches upon Copernicus, whose mind first grasped the idea that the earth moved round the sun, then upon Kepler and upon Galileo, and the storms that had arisen, when in 1632 he had demon- strated that truth at which Copernicus had guessed ; he praises highly Galileo's invention of the telescope, pays a tribute to the great men who had lectured at Gres- ham on these subjects, and especially to his own prede- cessor, Rooke, and winds up with an eloquent descrip- tion of London as a Pandora of cities to whom each of the choir of planets gave a peculiar blessing, on whom the sun shines benignly, who possesses more inhabi- tants than any city in the world, a healthy air, a fertile soil stretching far around her, beautiful buildings spring- ing as of themselves from the earth, and, lastly, is blessed by the moon, 'the governess of floods,' who alluring the seas thus far inland by means of the beloved Thames, makes her the city which nourishes the best seamen of the world. The rough draft of this address, written by Christopher in a bold hand with a few changes and corrections, is preserved in the ' Paren- talia.' This professorship obliged him to come up to London and give a course of lectures every Wednes- day in term time at Gresham College. None of these lectures have been preserved, and it seems from a hint in one of Dr. Sprat's letters, that Wren was in the habit of lecturing from rough notes merely, and used no pains to keep any record of them. At this time he made acquaintance with Richard HE MAY COME OUT AN HE WILL} 99 Claypole, who was married to Elizabeth, Cromwell's favourite daughter ; both she and her sister, Lady Falconbridge, were faithful members of the persecuted Church of England. Dr. Hewet still read the Prayer Book services in S. Gregory's Church, which adjoined S. Paul's, and there the two sisters resorted, there Dr. Hewet secretly married Mary Cromwell to Lord Falconbridge, as neither would be satisfied with the ceremony performed by an independent preacher. Cromwell's daughters used all their influence with their father on the side of mercy, but when the ex- cellent Dr. Hewet fell under his displeasure they pleaded in vain for his life. 1 Mr. Claypole professed a fondness for mathematical science and frequently invited Christopher Wren to his house. On one of these occasions when Wren was dining there, Crom- well himself entered, and, as was his custom in his own family, sat down to table without speech or ceremony. After a while he fixed his eyes on Chris- topher and said, ' Your uncle has been long confined in the Tower.' ' He has so, sir,' said Wren ; ' but he bears his afflictions with great patience and resignation/ ' He may come out an he will,' was Cromwell's un- expected reply. 'Will your Highness permit me to take him this from your own mouth ? ' said Wren, hardly able to believe his ears. ' Yes, you may/ said 1 Evelyn's Diary, March 31, 1658. ' That holy martyr Dr. Hewer condemned to die, without law, jury or justice by a mock council of State as they called it. A dangerous, treacherous time. June 8, ib. That excellent preacher and holy man Dr. Hewer was martyred for having intelligence of his Majesty, through the Lord Marquess of Ormond. He was beheaded on Tower Hill. The name was spelt Hewer, Hewet, .and, Hewett, H 2 ioo .SY/? CHRISTOPHER WREN. Cromwell briefly. At the earliest possible moment Christopher hurried to the Tower to communicate to his uncle the tidings that the long years of his imprison- ment were over. When he had poured out his news the Bishop replied warmly that it was not the first time he had received the like intimation from that miscreant, but he disdained the terms proposed for his enlargement, which were a mean acknowledgment of his favour and an abject submission to his detest- able tyranny ; that he was determined to tarry the Lord's leisure, and owe his deliverance, which was not far off, to Him only. Such an answer must have been startling enough to Christopher, and may have opened his eyes to the causes of Cromwell's seeming leniency. He left the brave old man to await the deliverance which the keen sight of faith showed him as drawing near, and returned to his own work. The death of Mrs. Claypole in the following summer must have checked an intimacy upon which Bishop Wren looked with little favour. She died of a terrible illness, and in the paroxysms of her pain bitterly reproached Cromwell for the innocent blood that he had shed, and particularly for that of Dr. Hewet. At about this period some experiments were made by Wren's philosophical friends wherein he took a principal part, and to which the barometer, now in common use, is mainly due. The first instrument of the kind was invented by Torricelli, the pupil of Galileo, who used it in order to ascertain the pressure of the air on fluids, the supposed cause of which pressure was the passing by of the body of the moon. Pascal, in THE CYCLOID. 101 those earlier days when his great genius employed itself on natural philosophy, made several experiments at Rouen, in 1646, with a friend, M. Petit, using ' Torricelli's tube,' as it was called. Similar trials were afterwards made by M. Perier, his brother-in-law, among the mountains of Auvergne. They then dis- covered that the rising and falling of the mercury was due not to the moon, but to the differences in the specific gravity of the atmosphere. Wren's experi- ments led him to the same conclusion, and at a later period he and Robert Boyle continued them until they produced the barometer, though it was not used commonly as a weather-glass until a much later date. Pascal did not pursue his discovery, but was satisfied with having proved the point for which he was con- tending. Though Wren and Pascal never met, some com- munication passed between them. Pascal, who was Wren's senior by eleven years, propounded a problem, under the name of Jean de Monfert, to the mathema- ticians of England, adding a challenge to them to solve it by a given day. Christopher sent a solution, and in his turn propounded a problem which seems never to have been answered. Pascal is said to have considered Wren's solution very carefully, but the promised prize of twenty pistoles was withheld by some trickery. Besides this, Wren wrote four mathe- matical tracts on the cycloid, and sent them to Dr. J. Wallis, who was publishing a book on mathematics. He corresponded with Pascal, 1 who was writing on the 1 Pascal is said to have written his treatise on the cycloid from a LIBRARY TTNTVERSTTY OF CALIFORNIA" 102 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. cycloid by the name of la Roulette, the problem being 1 to determine the curve made in the air by the nail of a coach wheel from the moment it rises from the ground, till the moment when the continual rolling of the wheel brings it back to the ground, after a com- plete turn, supposing the wheel a perfect circle and the ground perfectly level.' Wren was engaged also in a series of observations on the planet Saturn. These pursuits were, however, interrupted by an event that convulsed all England. On September 3, 1658, during a fearful storm which swept over London, Oliver Cromwell died. Hume * gives a terrible account of the state of constant suspicion and fear of assassination in which Cromwell passed the last year of his life ; the secret armour which he wore, his constant guard of soldiers wherever he moved, his fears on a journey, his habit of never returning the way he had come, nor by the direct road, seldom sleeping above three nights together in the same chamber, or in any he did not choose himself, or without sentinels. His body lay in state for a considerable time. The funeral, on October 22, Evelyn calls ' superb.' He says : ' I saw the Protector carried from Somerset House on a velvet bed of state drawn by six black horses, religious motive. It was a common opinion in France that the study of natural sciences, especially of mathematics, led to infidelity. Accordingly Pascal, writing for geometricians and mathematicians, wished to show, by the solution, vainly sought before, of this problem, that the same man who wrote the Lettres d un Provincial could also instruct them in abstract science, and he published his treatise in the intervals of writing the Penstes. See Vie de Pascal, par sa sceur Mad. Perier, Penstes de Pascal^ p. 13, ed. 1839. 1 Hist, of England, vol. vii. ch. Ixi. p. 292. CROMWELL S FUNERAL. 103 houss'd with the same ; the pall held up by his new lords ; Oliver lying in effigie in royal robes, crown'd with a crown, sceptre, and globe like a king . . . a knight of honour armed cap-a-pie, and, after all, his guard, soldiers, and innumerable mourners. In this equipage they proceeded to Westminster ; but it was the joyfullest funeral I ever saw, for there were none that cried but dogs, which the soldiers hooted away with a barbarous noise, drinking and taking tobacco in the streets as they went.' Under the feeble rule of Richard Cromwell at first and then under the multiform tyranny of the re- assembled ' Long Parliament,' every kind of disorder and oppression had free course. Monk grievously disappointed the Royalist hopes by proclaiming Richard Cromwell. The day of deliverance appeared more than ever distant. The Gresham Professors were all driven out of the college except Dr. Goddard, Cromwell's physician, and the place was garrisoned by soldiers, who did it great damage. Matthew Wren made an attempt two days after Cromwell's funeral to enter the college, and sent a curious account to Christopher, who had returned to All Souls at Oxford. He writes : ' Dear Cousin, Yesterday being the first of the term, I resolved to see whether Dr. Horton l entertained the new auditory at Gresham with any lecture, for I took it for granted that if his divinity could be spared your mathematics would not be expected. 1 Gresham Professor of Divinity, confirmed in his post by Cromwell. 104 SJK CHRISTOPHER WREN. But at the gate I was stopped by a man with a gun, who told me there was no admission upon that account, as the college was reformed into a garrison. Then changing my pretension, I scarce got permis- sion to go in to Dr. Goddard, who gave me assurance enough that none of your colleagues intend to appear this term unless the soldiers be removed, of which there is no probability. Upon these premises it is the opinion of all your friends that you may save that journey hither, unless some other occasion calls you ; and for these I expect you will make me your agent, if they be such as I am capable of de- spatching. ' But it will not perhaps be amiss to take from hence the occasion of a short and civil letter to the Com- mittee, signifying that you hope you have not de- ceived their expectations in choosing you, and that you are ready to attend your duty but for this public interruption and exclusion from your chamber ; or what else you will that looks towards this. ' I know no more domestic news than what every- body talks of. Yesterday I was in Westminster Hall, and saw only Keudigate and Windham in the two courts, and Wild and Parker in the Exchequer. In the Chancery none at all ; Bradshaw keeps the seal as if it were to be carried before him in the other world, whither he is going. Glyn and Foun- tain pleaded at the bar. They talk much of the mediation of the two Crowns, and proceed so far as to name Marshall Clerambault for the Embassador who is to come hither from France. My service to LETTERS FROM LONDON, 105 all friends. Dear Cousin, your most humble ser- vant, 'M. W. ' London, October 25, 1658.' Dr. Sprat 1 writes also to Christopher at about the same time : ' Dear Sir, This day I went to visit Gresham College, but found the place in such a nasty condition, so defiled, and the smells so infernal that if you should now come to make use of your tube, it would be like Dives looking out of hell into heaven. Dr. Goddard, of all your colleagues, keeps possession, which he could never be able to do had he not before prepared his nose for camp perfumes by his voyage into Scotland, and had he not such excellent restoratives in his cellars.' 1 Thomas Sprat, D.D., Dean of Westminster, and afterwards Bishop of Rochester ; was an active member of the Royal Society, and was educated at Wadham College with Sir C. Wren, whose intimate friend he was : born 1636 ; died 1713. CHAPTER V. 1659-1663. APOSTOLICAL SUCCESSION DIFFICULTY OF PRESERVING IT LETTERS FROM LORD CLARENDON BISHOP WREN'S RELEASE THE RESTORA- TION CONVOCATION SAVILIAN PROFESSORSHIP ROYAL SOCIETY 'ELEPHANT IN THE MOON' PEMBROKE CHAPEL BEGUN. Yet bethink thee that the spirit whence those princely bounties flowed To the ties of private feeling all its force and being owed ; Severed from the bonds of kindred, taught his lonely heart to school, By his Father's chastening kindness or his Church's sterner rule ; Oft to spots by memory cherished, where his earliest love began, In his age's desolation, fondly turned the childless man. Phrontisterion, by Dean Mansel. CHAPTER V. ALL was confusion, doubt and anxiety in the country ; the Royalist plots failed ; the Parliament was powerless ; no one knew whether Monk intended, as was still hoped by a few, to bring back the King, or to support the Parliament, or to make himself dictator ; those were keen eyes which could discern through the darkness any ray of approaching light. Nowhere perhaps did matters seem more desperate than in the Church. Her discipline and order, barely revived by the murdered Archbishop, had been for eighteen years trampled upon and neglected ; ' by the licentiousness of the times,' many were growing up unbaptised and ignorant of Christianity. The number of bishops living was but small, many sees being already vacant when the Civil War broke out, and imprisonments and hardships had so reduced the Prelates that, in 1659, but ten survived, one of whom, Dr. Brownrigg, Bishop of Exeter, very soon died. Of the nine others, many were very old ; the Bishop of London (Juxon) was very ill, and the Bishop of Ely was in prison. How was the succession to be pre- served if the troubles of the times continued ? The Scotch Church had been reduced by persecution ; the Irish Bishops were in as evil a plight as their English i io SIX CtfKISTOPffEK WREN. brethren, and the difficulty of communication was great. There was then no daughter Church in America or in the Colonies to render back in time of need the grace they had themselves received. It was hardly possible for the English Bishops to meet for consultation ; but the indefatigable Dr. Barwick was authorised l ' not only to ride about among them all, and by pro- posing and explaining to each what was thought for the Church's Service ; to collect the opinions and resolutions of every one of them upon all difficult affairs ; but also to procure the communication of all that was needful between their lordships and His Majesty, which he frequently did by letters written in characters ' (i.e. cypher). Great difficulties lay in the way of the first step a canonical election and in the face of the watchful enmity of the Church of Rome, no doubtful step could be taken ; and even were this difficulty surmounted and three Bishops got together, the risk of imprisonment and death to both consecrators and consecrated needed no one to point it out. The two with whom Dr. Bar- wick principally consulted were the Bishops of Ely and Salisbury. Many letters passed between Dr. Barwick and Mr. Hyde, 2 at Brussels, in one of which, written on July 8, i659, 8 the latter speaks of 'much preferring the Bishop of Ely's judgment and advice in that point (the method of election) before any man's. I pray remember my service with all 1 Life of Dr. Barwick, p. 201. 8 Afterwards Lord Clarendon. 3 Life of Dr. Barwick. p. 424. LETTERS IN CYPHER. in imaginable reverence to my Lord of Ely and assure him, that the King will always return that candour, benignity and equality to both the Universities, which he wishes ; and I hope all who shall be en- trusted by him in that great affair will be as just and dispassioned in all their interpositions and look upon them as equal lights to learning and piety and equally worthy of all encouragement and protection. And if at present my Lord of Ely will recommend any person to his Majesty for the Bishoprick of Carlisle, he shall be approved. And if my Lord will transmit a list of persons to be specially re- commended to the King for any dignities of the Church, I dare promise the persons shall find that they could not have been better recommended. I know not what more to add but my hearty service to your sick friend, 1 whose health I pray for as a publick concernment. To yourself I shall say no more but that I shall think myself very faulty if I do not serve you very heartily, and if you do not with the first receive some evidence of the sense the King hath of your service. ' I am very heartily, Sir, your most affectionate servant, ' HYDE.' These letters, thirty-six in number, were trans- mitted in cypher, and with the utmost precaution and considerable delay in awaiting a safe opportunity ; the one quoted from is endorsed ' Received not till Aug. 29.' Nor was the cypher, however carefully contrived, 1 Probably Bishop Juxon, more than once alluded to under this name in these letters. 112 SfK CHRISTOPHER WREN, always a security when the letters fell into the wrong hands. Dr. Wallis, the mathematician, was a most skilful decypherer, and was the person who decyphered the King's papers taken in his cabinet at Naseby, though the Royalists considered this a vain boast until Matthew Wren, the Bishop's eldest son, ob- tained the proof of it from Dr. Wallis himself. One important letter from Dr. Barwick to Mr. Hyde fell into Dr. Wallis' hands ; Mr. Allestry his coadjutor coming from Brussels was seized and imprisoned as soon as he landed. Bishop Morton of Durham, the last surviving Prelate of the province of York, had died, as his epitaph says, ' deprived of all his goods except a good name and a good conscience.' The rising in Cheshire had been unsuccessful. Monk refused to give even his brother any hint of his intentions, and made no reply to the letter which King Charles sent to him from Breda. In short, matters were as adverse as it was possible for them to be, but yet Dr. Barwick was undiscouraged ; with fresh precautions the corre- spondence with Mr. Hyde was resumed, and in truth the matter pressed ; ' for,' says Dr. Barwick, writing in Sept. 1659, after mentioning his circuit among some of the surviving Bishops, 1 ' I fear this winter will go hard with some of them that may worst be spared in the due performance of such a work.' It is evident that Dr. Barwick was able to see and consult the im- prisoned Bishop of Ely whenever it was needful. These hurried meetings, full of anxiety and peril as they were, must have been a great refreshment to the 1 Life of Dr. Barwick, p. 437. 'WHAT IS TO BECOME OF THE CHURCH?* 113 Bishop, who thus still took part in the work of the Church. He declined to send any list of names to the King, though he pressed Dr. Barwick to accept the Bishoprick of Man. Mr. Hyde l wrote a letter in September, which was not received till November 10, where he says : ' The King hath done all that is in his power to do ; and if my Lords the Bishops will not do the rest, what is to become of the Church ? The conspiracies to destroy it are very evident; and if there be no combination to preserve it, it must expire. I do assure you the names of all the Bishops who are alive, and their several ages, are as well known at Rome as in England, and both the Papist and the Pres- byterian value themselves very much upon comput- ing in how few years the Church of England must expire.' . . . And again : 'His Majesty is most con- fident that the Bishop of Ely will give all the assist- ance and advice which his restraint will permit him to do. ... I do beseech you,' says the next letter, 'present my humble service to my Lord of Ely, whose benediction, I do hope to live to receive at his own feet. I pray send me word our sick friend is in perfect health.' But little progress appears to have been made, since Mr. Hyde writes, Nov. 28 : ' I can say no more with reference to the Church, but that if there be nothing hinders it but the winter it be quickly over, whilst preparations are making ; 1 Life of Dr. B arivick, p. 449. I 114 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. and yet, God knows, it will be almost a miracle, if the winter doth not take away half the Bishops that are left alive ; and I must still lament that some way is not found that the Bishop of Ely may be at liberty ; which would carry on this work more than any ex- pedient that I can think of.' An entry in Evelyn's diary shows the general state of affairs at this time : ' October 1 1 . The armie now turned out the Parlia- ment. We had now no government in the nation ; all in confusion ; no magistrate either own'd or pre- tended but the souldiers, and they not agreed. God Almighty have mercy on and settle us ! ' Evelyn was not slack in doing what in him lay towards this much-desired settlement : ' November 7. Was published my bold " Apologie " for the King in this time of danger when it was capital to speake or write in favour of him. It was printed twice, so universally it took.' A fast was kept in secret, apparently about once a fortnight, by the Churchmen in London to pray ' for God's mercy to our calamitous Church.' On February 3, 1660, Evelyn writes : ' General Monk came to London from Scotland, but no man knew what he would do or declare. Yet he was met on all his way by the gentlemen of all the counties which he passed, with petitions that he would recall the old, long-interrupted Parliament, and settle the nation in some order, being at this BISHOP WREN'S RELEASE. 115 time in most prodigious confusion and under no government, everybody expecting what would be next and what he would do.' Later in the same month Mr. Hyde wrote almost in despair to Dr. Barwick : l ' It would be very good news if I could hear of my Lord of Ely being in full liberty, to whom I pray present my humble service. The truth is I have but little hope of the business of the Church but by his being at liberty, and therefore I hope he will make no scruple of accept- ing it if it be offered, or if it can be reasonably ob- tained.' The suspense which Evelyn describes had not long to be endured. On February n, the very day after Monk had dismayed the city by breaking down its gates and allowing the soldiers to march about it in triumph, he turned out the Parliament then sitting at Westminster, and called together the former one, to the great joy of the people. From this moment all hearts and wishes turned to the exiled royal family as the one hope left of tranquillity and order ; thus suddenly, when the royalist hopes were lowest, their hearts' desire was given to them. Monk, now in supreme power, did not forget the Bishop of Ely, whose fellow-captive he had been and who must have rejoiced to see Monk at last justify his confidence. On March 15 the lieutenant of the Tower received the order ' That Dr. Wren, Bishop of Ely, be discharged from his imprisonment.' Thus the eighteen years of captivity came to an end, and the 1 Life of Dr. Barwick p. 496, I 2 n 6 S/X CHRISTOPHER WREN. Bishop came forth from the Tower, an old man of seventy-five, broken by many sorrows. It cannot have been with unmixed joy that he once more trod another path than that wonted one on the leads of the Tower. True, the King was coming home in peace to a people longing tc receive him. This return was a promise of deliverance for the Church, and an end to that difficulty of preserving the Aposto- lical Succession which had so nearly proved a fatal one. And yet, the flood, which in those eighteen years had passed over the land, had swept away many whom the Bishop loved well. The King might return in triumph, but he was not the sovereign whom, from his youth, Bishop Wren had loved and served. The primate with whom he had worked, had been cruelly murdered ; and none could restore the wife and children who had pined and died during the long years of his imprison- ment. The Church, however, remained, and for her Bishop Wren would work while life lasted. Part of his employment in the Tower had been the writing of treatises and sermons, one of which on the Scotch Covenant, from the text ' Neither behave thyself fro- wardly in the covenant,' he dispersed over the dioceses of Norwich and Ely, lodging the while where he could in London, as he was not yet allowed to go back either to Downham in Suffolk or to Ely House in Holborn. It appeared, as was truly said, as if he had not been ' so much released as thrust out of prison.' Homeless and penniless as he then seemed, Bishop Wren's spirit was in no respect daunted ; when he left in safety the Tower where he had once thought to lay THE RESTORATION. 117 his head on the block, he planned the thank-offering which he would make to God. His children, from whom he had been so long separated, who were scattered everywhere and had been reduced to the greatest straits, he with much difficulty gathered to- gether again, and they awaited the event of Monk's decision. At length came that 2Qth of May so often de- scribed in history and fiction. Evelyn's l account of it is interesting, as that of an eyewitness : 'This day his majestic Charles II. came to London, after a sad and long exile and calamitous suffering both of the king and church, being seventeen yeares. This was also his birthday ; and with a triumph of above 20,000 horse and foote, brandishing their swords and shouting with inexpressible joy ; the wayes strewed with flowers, the bells ringing, the streetes hung with tapestry, fountaines running with wine ; the maior, aldermen, and all the companies in their liveries, chaines of gold, and banners ; lords and nobles clad in cloth of silver, gold, and velvet ; the windowes and balconies well set with ladies : trumpets, music, and myriads of people flocking even so far as from Rochester, so as they were seven houres in passing the citty, even from two in afternoone till nine at night. I stood in the Strand and beheld it, and blessed God. All this was don without one drop of bloudshed, and by that very army which rebelled against him.' By degrees matters settled down to a more ordinary level. The Church Service was restored at 1 Diary, May 29, 1660. n8 SfX CHRISTOPHER Whitehall, and on June 28 Pepys mentions l ' poor Bishop Wren going to chapel, it being a thanksgiving day for the King's returne.' The vacant sees were now filled up as speedily as possible. Bishop Juxon was translated to Canterbury, Sheldon succeeding him as Bishop of London ; the northern province, then wholly without bishops, had its losses supplied. The Prayer Book was not by any means commonly used again for some time, Pepys characteristically says 2 ' July i. This morning come home my fine camlett cloak, with gold buttons, and a silk suit which cost me much money, and I pray God make me able to pay for it. In the afternoon to the Abbey, where a good sermon by a stranger, but no Common Prayer yet.' In the following November, to quote the same writer, ' men did begin to nibble at the Common Prayer.' Matters were really progressing, the cathedrals and the court chapels as well as those in the Bishop's palaces setting the example. In February (1661) Evelyn heard ' Dr. Baldero preach at Ely House on St. Matthew vi. 33 ; after the sermon the Bishop of Ely gave us the blessing very pontifically.' 3 Ely House was an ancient possession of the see, 4 the gift of William de Ludd, who in the reign of Edward I. gave the house and endowed it with his manor of Ouldbourne, a name which soon grew into Holbourn. The garden and its strawberries are immor- 1 Diary, vol. i. p. 112, ed. 1828. 2 Ib., p. 114. a Diary, 4 Repertothim, vol. ii. p. 273. Newcourt. ELY HOUSE. 119 talised by Shakespeare. It was leased to Sir Christopher Hatton by Bishop Cox in Queen Elizabeth's reign, and a struggle between the Hatton family and the Bishops of Ely then began which lasted until I772. 1 In Wren's time, the Bishops had recovered some of the buildings, and he had lived here before the rebellion. During that time the house had been used as a prison for ' malignant priests,' especially those of the city of London, and he must have found the whole building sorely defaced and injured. The chapel, dedicated to S. Etheldreda, is a beauti- ful piece of Gothic architecture ; and there, when it had been cleansed and restored to some order, many of the new bishops were consecrated, and Bishop Wren assisted at that preservation of the Apostolical Succession which but two years before had seemed well-nigh hopeless. Much was done at Ely House. In the May of 1 66 1 the Convocation of Canterbury met in S. Paul's, its marred, plundered condition not inaptly showing the adversities through which the Church of England had passed. The Convocation had much work before it, the most pressing being to prepare a service for the baptism of those of riper years and for May 29. In order to this a committee of both Houses of Con- vocation was formed, which met at Ely House, and of which Bishop Wren appears to have been the ruling 1 In that year the last Lord Hatton died ; the bishops resigned Ely House to the Crown, and received No. 37 Dover Street in exchange. The chapel, after years of neglect, has also been suffered to pass out of the hands of the Church into those of the Romanists. See Walks in London by A. C. Hare, vol. ii. pp. 196-201. t2<5 SfK CHRISTOPHER WREN. spirit. Many were still half afraid of their true posi- tion and afraid of the Puritan party ; eighteen years of confusion and persecution had slackened all discipline, and many things seemed natural to the new generation which neither Bishop Andrewes nor Archbishop Laud would have tolerated for a day. It is implied in Dr. Barwick's Life that many of those who should have upheld the Church discipline were willing, from a mistaken notion of conciliation and peace, to let it go. Bishop Wren set his face resolutely against this doctrine. In November the Convocation met again. Dr. John Barwick had been appointed to the deanery of S. Paul's, and in spite of very failing health, had resumed the weekly Communions, daily prayers, and musical services of the cathedral, and had succeeded in making the choir, where the Puritans had stabled their horses, once more fit for Divine service. At this session of Convocation the Prayer Book was finally revised, after the Bishops had heard at the Savoy Conference all that the Puritans could urge against it. Bishop Wren had been actively engaged in this work, and suggested a considerable number of alterations and additions, many of which were adopted. A large number of gram- matical errors had crept in to the old book : for example, ' which ' instead of ' who ' was in almost all the collects and the Apostles' creed. It still, by some oversight, survives in the Lord's Prayer. 1 ' The alter- ing whereof,' says Bishop Wren, ' if it may seem strange 1 Fragmentary Ilhistrations of the History of the Book of Common, Prayer, edited by the Bishop of Chester, p. 47, et seq. REVISION OF THE PRAYER BOOK. lit at first to unskilful ears, yet will it not be a nine days' wonder, but for ever after a right expression in all our addresses unto God.' Page after page he corrected with the utmost care, from the very title-page and calendar to the end. July has the characteristic note, ' Out with Dog-days from amongst the Saints.' A considerable number of his suggestions are part of the Prayer Book to this day. The final clause of the prayer for the Church Militant beginning ' We also bless, etc.,' though not Bishop Wren's composition, as he intended to have replaced the Commemoration of the Saints and the Thanks- giving as it stood in the first Prayer Book of Edward VI., is yet due to his suggestion. The whole series of notes and emendations is very interesting, though they are more than can be given here. Two things plainly appear : that he wished to return as nearly as possible to the first Prayer Book of Edward VI., as the one most closely resembling the offices of the Early Church ; that he was very desirous to have the book made as full, as plain, and as clear as the English language could make it. He was anxious that no needless stumbling-blocks should remain in the path either of Churchmen or of Nonconformists, but at the same time he had no intention of bartering any portion of Church truth or discipline for the doubtful advan- tages of ' comprehension.' It is a proof that he was not, with all his high- minded firmness, the persecuting prelate of Puritan pamphleteers, or the sour and severe man which, in early days, Lord Clarendon thought him, that both in 122 SfR CHRISTOPHER, WREN. Norwich, his former diocese, and in the one he then ruled, most of the clergy renounced the Covenant. 1 S. Bartholomew's day, 1662, was the time fixed for those who refused to conform to the Church to resign their livings. It has been easy to represent this as a piece of crael tyranny, as the turning out of a body of pious men who were labouring in the work which others neglected. In truth, as even Milton says, they were ' time-servers, covetous, illiterate persecutors, not lovers of the truth, like in most things whereof they had accused their predecessors.' To this grave indictment must be added that they were, in the strict- est sense, intruders, thrust into charges by Cromwell's authority, while the true priests were imprisoned, fined, forbidden to minister, or even to teach as schoolmasters, and literally left to starve. ' The majority of these were dead and none had been ordained to fill up the gaps, during all the long years since the Church's overthrow. . . Of the eight thou- sand intruding Nonconformists, a bare two thousand 1 Bishop Kennet says, ' One particular will appear ' (from Bishop Wren's Register), ' that there were but few of the parochial clergy deprived in this diocese (Ely) in 1662, for not submitting to the Act of Uniformity, though more of the old legal incumbents had been sequestered about 1644 than in proportion within any other diocese.' Grey's Examination of Neale's History of the Puritans, vol. iv. p. 328. From the same authority it appears that most of the clerks deprived in 1662 had other callings, e.g. cobbling, gloving, skinning, bookselling, husbandry, and to these they generally returned. Some of his clergy had come to him in the Tower for institution, in the early part of his imprisonment, and that many were faithful to him is evident from the fact they were expelled their livings for ' following Bishop Wren's fancies,' no other crimes being pretended against them. Annals of England, p. 392. GARTER RECORDS RESTORED. 123 1,700 would probably be nearer the number refused conformity. ' In other words, the Church of the Restoration had to begin her work with a clergy of whom at least three-fourths were aliens at heart to her doc- trine and her discipline. To the politician this result was most satisfactory ; to the Church little short of disastrous.' l One of the earliest appointments made at the Restoration was that of Dr. Bruno Ryves 2 to be Dean of Windsor and Registrar of the Garter. In the August of 1660, Christopher Wren went to Windsor, and solemnly delivered to the Dean the three registers and the note books of the Order of the Garter, which Dean Wren had, with so much difficulty, recovered and hidden carefully until, at his death, he transferred the charge to his son. Dean Ryves gave a written acknowledgment to Christopher that he had safely received the books, and the service his father had done in preserving them was fully admitted. Gresham College had been cleansed and set in order after the Restoration, and Christopher resumed his lectures there, which were largely attended. 1 See an interesting article, The Church of England in the Eighteenth Century, in the Church Quarterly Review, July, 1877, p. 321, et seq. It is not however quite accurate to say ' none were ordained,' for Bishop Duppa held secretly ' frequent ordinations of young loyal church scholars,' among whom was Tenison, afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury. History of the Book of Common Prayer, Lath bury, p. 296. 2 Dr. Bruno Ryves, Dean of Chichester in 1642, was in the city during Sir William Waller's siege, and left a description of the sack of the cathedral and robbery of its plate by the commander and his troops. Dean Ryves was fined I2O/. and deprived. Memorials of the See of Chi Chester, p. 286. i24 SJK CHRISTOPHER WREN. After one of these lectures given in November, Lord Brouncker, Mr. Robert Boyle, Dr. Goddard, Dr. Petty, Dr. Wilkins, Sir Robert Moray and others withdrew with Wren to his room, where they discussed a project for a philosophical College or Society. It was not an entirely new idea, for it had been a favourite scheme of Evelyn's, also of the poet Cowley's. 1 It was not a matter to be arranged in one sitting, and ac- cordingly they settled to meet weekly in Wren's rooms after his lectures, and agreed that for incidental ex- penses each should pay down ten shillings and sub- scribe a shilling weekly. A list was made of between thirty and forty probable members, among them those previously mentioned, and Christopher's old friend Sir C. Scarborough, Dr. Seth Ward, Matthew Wren, Cowley, Sir Kenelme Digby, Mr. Evelyn and others. Sir Robert Moray undertook to explain the project to King Charles, and brought back a gracious message that he well approved of it, and would be ready to give it every encouragement. One of the first orders of the Society was that Wren should at the next meet- ing of the Society bring in his account of the pendulum experiment, with his explanation of it : this experi- ment related to ' the determination of a standard measure of length by the vibration of a pendulum.' 2 1 Abraham Cowley, born 1618; educated at Westminster; was the intimate friend of Lord Falkland and of the poet Crashaw. Cowley followed Henrietta Maria to Paris, remaining steadily loyal. He died 1667. 2 History of the Royal Society (by C. R. Weld), p. 96. Galileo is said to have first discovered the use of the pendulum as a measure of time, while watching the oscillations of the bronze lamp in the cathedral at Pisa. A pendulum clock was long reckoned a ' rarity.' Bishop Seth S AVI LI AN PROFESSORSHIP. 125 There followed experiments for the improvement of shipping, in which Wren worked with Dr. Petty and Dr. Goddard. It was a question to what mechanical powers sailing, especially when against the wind, was reducible ; ' he showed it to be a wedge ; and he demonstrated how a transient force upon an oblique plane would cause the motion of the plane against the first mover. He made an instrument that mechanically produced the same effect and showed the reason of sail- ing to all winds.' But to give all Christopher's experiments would be to write over again the already well-told history of the Royal Society. It had few more assiduous members. In 1 66 1, Christopher resigned his Gresham Pro- fessorship, in order to accept the Savilian Professorship of Astronomy, at Oxford. 1 It had been held by Dr. Seth Ward, who was soon afterwards made Bishop of Salisbury in succession to Bishop Hyde. Shortly after his appointment, Christopher had a command from the King to make him a lunar globe, according to the observations made with the best telescopes. He con- structed one ' representing not only the spots and Ward presented one, made by Fromantel, to the Society in 1662, in memory of his friend Mr. Laurence Rooke, late Astronomy Professor at Gresham College. 1 Founded 1619 by Sir Henry Savile. He required that the Professor should explain the Ptolemaic and Copernican and other modern astro- nomical systems, should teach and read on Optics, Dialling, Geography and Navigation. He was to be of any nation in Christendom, provided he was of good reputation, had a fair knowledge of Greek, and was twenty- six years of age. If an Englishman he must have taken his M.A. degree. The choice of a professor was to lie with the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Lord Chancellor, the Chancellor of the University, the Bishop of London, the principal Secretary of State, Chief Justices, the Lord Chief Baron, and Dean of Arches. Oxford, vol. ii. p. 188. Ayliffe. 126 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. various degrees of whiteness on the surface, but the hills, eminences, and cavities moulded in solid work.' This curious toy was highly admired, placed in the King's cabinet at Whitehall, and esteemed a great 1 rarity.' In this year Wren took his degree as Doctor of Civil Laws, Oxford, and received a similar honour from the University of Cambridge. King Charles purposed paying a visit to Oxford, and the Philoso- phical Society both there and in London resolved to give him an entertainment. Lord Brouncker wrote from London to Wren to consult him. Wren wrote back : * My Lord, The Act and noise at Oxford being over, I retir'd to myself as speedily as I could to obey your Lordship and contribute something to the collection of Experiments designed by the Society, for his Majesty's Reception. I concluded on some- thing I thought most suitable for such an occasion ; but the stupidity of our artists here makes the apparatus so tedious that I foresee I shall not be able to bring it to anything within the time pro- posed. What in the meanwhile to suggest to your Lordship I cannot guess.' . . . ' Geometrical pro- blems, and new methods, however useful, will be but tasteless in a transient show.' He enumerates various things which he had thought of and rejected : ' designs of engines, scenographical tricks, designs of architecture, chymical experiments, experiments in anatomy, which last are sordid and noisome to any but those whose desire of knowledge < so MUCH TATTLE: 127 makes them digest it.' ' Experiments of Natural Philosophy are seldom pompous, and certainly Nature in the best of her works is apparent enough in obvious things, were they but curiously observed ; and the key that opens treasures is often plain and rusty, but unless it be gilt it will make no show at Court/ He proposed to show an experiment with a 1 weather wheel to measure the expansions of air.' Another 'no unpleasing spectacle of seeing a man live without new air as long as you please ; ' this was to be effected by an instrument of Wren's invention which cooled, percolated, and purified the air. Also 'an artificial eye truly and dioptrically rrec'e as bi as a tennis-ball.' ' My Lord/ the letter ends, ' if my first design had been perfect I had not troubled your Lordship with so much Tattle, but with something performed and done. But I am fain, in this letter, to do like some chymist who when Projection (his fugitive darling) hath left him threadbare, is forced to fall to vulgar Preparations to pay his Debts/ The King appointed Wren as assistant to Sir John Denham, the Surveyor-General of Works. Sir John had been appointed by Charles I., in reversion during the lifetime of Inigo Jones, surveyor at that time, and had succeeded, at Inigo Jones's death, to what was then but a barren honour. Evelyn, who had a dispute with Sir John about the placing of Greenwich Palace in that very year, says : ' I knew him to be a better 128 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. poet than architect, tho' he had Mr. Webb 1 (Inigo Jones's man) to assist him.' Of this Charles II. was probably aware, and anxious to supply his deficiency. That his choice should have fallen upon Wren, unless Evelyn's friendship suggested it, is remarkable, as, until then, Wren seems to have made no special study of architecture. No doubt the practical experience learned in the details of the assistant-surveyor's work was afterwards very serviceable to him. He appears to have had a most retentive memory as well as a very quick eye and power of apprehension. In spite, however, of these calls on his time he was assiduous at the Society's meetings. The death of Laurence Rooke, his friend and fellow-labourer, threw more work on his hands. Rooke was succeeded in the Geometry Professor- ship by Isaac Barrow, afterwards a well-known divine who, in his first Latin oration, eulogised the Savilian Professor as ' formerly a prodigy of a boy, now a miracle of a man, and a genius among mortals. Lest I should appear to speak falsehood, it will be enough for me to name to you the most ingenious and ex- cellent Christopher Wren.' 2 It was a high compli- ment, but Barrow knew that his audience would heartily re-echo it. It is to be hoped that Barrow's lectures were somewhat shorter than his sermons, which, fine as they are, were not always listened to with patience. ' On one occasion, when he was long preaching in the Abbey on a holiday, the servants of the Church, who 1 He married Inigo Jones's daughter. 2 Lives of the Gresham Professors, Ward, p. 97. A LONG SERMON. 129 on those days showed the tombs and effigies in wax of the Kings and Queens to the common people, fearing to spend that time in hearing which they might more profitably employ in receiving, caused the organs to blow until they had blowed him down/ l On March 25, 1663, the Society was finally incor- porated by a charter from the King, with a preamble written by Christopher Wren, explaining its objects. The style of the preamble is far more florid than is usual in Wren's writing : it has in it the exultation of one who is accomplishing a long-cherished scheme. One paragraph is evidently intended as a defence against certain attacks which were made upon the English philosophers as they had been in past times against Galileo : ' Not that herein we would withdraw the least ray of our influence from the present established nurseries of good literature and education, founded by the 1 Isaac Barrow, born 1630. He was so little studious as a boy, and so fond of fighting, that his father used often solemnly to wish that if it should please God to take one of his children it might be his son Isaac. When, however, in 1677, he did really die, the Lord Keeper (Lord Nottingham) sent his father a message of condolence, importing that ' he had but too great reason to grieve, since never father lost so good a son.' Dr. Isaac Barrow, Bishop of Man, 1663, and S. Asaph, 1669, was his uncle. Life of Dr. Barrow^ vol. i. p. ix., ed. 1830. Among his poems is the following, which seems to be incomplete : AD. DD. CHR. WREN. Ad te, sed passu tremulo vultuque rubenti, Fertur ad ingenii culmen, opella levis, Nee quid vult aliud (quid enim velit haud tibi notum) Quam ut justum authoris deferat. Ib. vol. viii. p. 541 K 1 30 5/A" CHRISTOPHER WREN. piety of our royal ancestors and others, and whose laws which as we are obliged to defend, so the holy blood of our martyred Father hath especially en- deared to us, but, that we purpose to make further provision for this branch of knowledge likewise, Natural Experimental Philosophy/ . . . ' Taking care as in the first place for Religion so next for the riches and ornaments of our kingdoms, as we wear an Imperial Crown in which flowers are alter- nately intermixed with the ensigns of Christianity.' King Charles, the Duke of York, and Prince Rupert, always a lover of experiments, were among the first members of the Society, and its beginning was prosperous enough ; but Court favour has always created some envy. It happened that in the self-same year Butler, 1 then secretary to Jeremy Taylor's friend, Lord Carbery, published his famous ' Hudibras.' It created a great sensation ; the Court read it, the town read it ; Pepys, hearing ' the world cry it up so mightily, tried twice or three times reading to bring himself to think it witty.' It was in everyone's mouth, and Butler naturally thought himself sure of promotion. None, however, came to him, and he directed his bitter wit against those more fortunate than himself, the members of the new Royal Society, and Bishop Sprat in par- ticular, in a poem called ' The Elephant in the Moon,' which opened as follows : 1 Samuel Butler, born 1612, died, it is said, in great poverty, and was buried in S. Paul's, Covent Garden, 1680. 'THE ELEPHANT IN THE MOON: 131 ' A learn'd Society of late, The glory of a neighbouring state, Agreed upon a summer night To search the moon by her own light, To take an invent'ry of all Her real estate and personal. To observe her country how 'twas planted, With what she abounded most or wanted, And make the proper'st observations For settling of new plantations, If the Society should incline T' attempt so glorious a design.' With sharp touches indicating the various Members of the Society the satire continues, telling how they see in the moon, through the telescope, marvellous things, and an appearance of an immense elephant ; they agree that a record must be made, and during the discussion who is to write it, one of the servants peep- ing through the telescope discovers that a mouse has got in between the two glasses ! It, and a swarm of ^> o small flies, are the causes of the mysterious phenomena, the vast beast, the marching and countermarching armies which have been so learnedly explained ! l The Society does not seem to have paid much attention to the poet, and the experiments went on as usual. A different task was presently offered to Wren by the King. When he married Catharine of 1 Wren's lunar globe will be remembered. Vide supra^ p. 125. The satire made some sensation and caused La Fontaine to write Un Animal dans la Lune, in which, courtier like, he pays a compliment to Charles II., and hints at the happiness of England at peace and able to give herself ' a ces emplois,' while France was at war with Holland, Spain, and the Empire. K 2 1 32 SfR CHRISTOPHER WREN. Portugal, he received Tangiers, Tripoli, and Bombay as part of her dowry. Tangiers was reckoned as a very important place to the English, whose sailors were still constantly harassed by the Moorish pirates, and the fortifications of the town were a pressing care. King Charles offered, through Matthew Wren, then Lord Clarendon's secretary, a commission to Christopher Wren, as one of the best geometricians in Europe, to survey and direct the works at the mole, harbour, and fortifications of Tangiers, offering him an ample salary, leave of absence from his Professorship, and a rever- sionary grant of Sir John Denham's office. Flattering though the offer was, Christopher declined it on the ground of his health, and begged the King to com- mand his duty in England. He no doubt judged wisely, and the refusal gave no offence at Court. Perhaps the leave of absence might not have been easily obtained, for the following letter from Dr. Sprat shows that Wren was already embarrassed by the difficulty of being in two places at once : ' My dear Sir, I must confess I have some little Peek against you therefore am not much displeased, that I have this occasion of telling you some ill news. The Vice-Chancellor did yesterday send for me to inquire where the Astronomy Professor was, and the reason of his absence so long after the beginning of the term. I used all the arguments I could for your Defence. I told him that Charles the Second was King of England, Scotland, France and Ireland-, and that he was by the late Act of A WARM FRIEND. 133 Parliament declared absolute Monarch in these his dominions : and that it was this mighty Prince who had confined you to London. I endeavour'd to per- suade him that the drawing of lines in Sir Harry Savill's school was not altogether of so great a con- cernment for the benefit of Christendom as the rebuilding of St. Paul's or the fortifying of Tangier ; (for I understood those were the great works in which that extraordinary Genius of yours was judg'd necessary to be employ'd). All this I urged, but after some Discourse, he told me, that he was not now to consider you as Dr. Bayly 1 (for so he ow'd you all Kindness) but as Vice Chancellor, and under that Capacity he most terribly told me that he took it very ill you had not all this while given him any Account of what hinder'd you in the Discharge of your Office. This he bid me tell you, and I do it not very unwillingly because I see that our Friend- ships are so closely ty'd together that the same Thing which was so great a Prejudice to me (my losing your Company all this while here) does also something redound to your Disadvantage. And so, my dear Sir, now my Spite and Spleen is satisfied, I must needs return to my old Temper again, and faithfully assure you that I am with the most violent Zeal and Passion, your most affectionate and de- voted Servant, ' TIIO. SPRAT.' Wren had also employment at Cambridge, of a kind he would have been loth to put in other hands. 1 Dr. Richard Bayley, President of S. John's College. I 3 4 S/ff CHRISTOPHER WREN. His uncle, the Bishop of Ely, had instantly on his release determined to give a chapel to Pembroke Hall, Cambridge, where he had been a scholar under Launcelot Andrewes, 1 and he employed his nephew as his architect. Upon this work and its endowment the Bishop expended 5,ooo/., the first money he received after his release. His personal habits were austerely simple ; for the last twenty years of his life he drank no wine, and only ate off" a wooden trencher, practis- ing fasting and abstinence with great strictness. He had never spent any of the revenues of his see upon his children, and now he made the chapel his heir, bestowing upon it an estate at Hardwick in Cambridge- shire. The chapel, which has a peculiar interest as Wren's first architectural work, is built in the classical style he was to make famous in England, and bears his mark in its beautiful proportions, the richness of its stucco ceiling and the pannelled wood-work. The plain glazing of the windows and a something of bare- ness about the whole, are probably to be accounted for by the necessity of limiting the expense to a fixed sum. Its first stone was laid May 13, 1663, by the Master, Dr. Frank, acting for Bishop Wren, who was not present. 2 It was probably at the same time that Wren executed some repairs in Ely Cathedral which had 1 Bishop Andrewes bequeathed 3327. to the library of Pembroke College. 2 Some alterations have recently been made at Pembroke, in which, under the late Sir G. Scott's orders, the chapel has been lengthened by about 20 feet, the stucco of the exterior stripped, and the red brick pointed. A SAD RETURN. 135 suffered, like every other grand church, from the fury of the Puritans. Bitter indeed must have been the regret with which the surviving clergy returned to find the fabrics of their churches plundered and laid waste, and their flocks scattered or corrupted. CHAPTER VI. 1664-1667. REPAIR OF S. PAUL'S SHELDONIAN THEATRE THE PLAGUE A LETTER FROM PARIS CONSECRATION OF PEMBROKE CHAPEL FIRE OF LONDON BISHOP WREN'S DEATH HIS FAMILY. Yet, London, Empress of the Northern Clime, By an high fate thou greatly didst expire, Great as the world's, which, at the death of time, Must fall, and rise a nobler frame by fire Annus Mirabilis, ccxii. Dryden. CHAPTER VI. THE repairs of S. Paul's Cathedral could not be delayed. Wren, as Sir John Denham's assistant, was greatly occupied about the matter, which was one of no ordinary difficulty. The responsibility was really his, for Sir John went out of his mind, and though he re- covered, probably did but little business. When Inigo Jones built his portico, he cased the nave with Portland stone, and rebuilt the north and south fronts. In doing so he pared down the original pointed architecture, until little of its beauty or charac- ter remained. His work had in its turn been damaged by the Puritans, who set up booths in the portico, and dug sawpits in the cathedral inclosure. Besides these injuries Christopher Wren's accurate eye detected graver faults in the original design, some of which he enumerates. ' The pillars of the nave, though eleven feet in diameter, were only cased with stone, and filled up with rubbish inside. The roof was always too heavy for them, so that they are bent outwards on both sides, so that the roof already cracked will finally fall in.' He proposed to substitute a roof 1 of ' a light, 1 For an account of the great rarity of stone roofs see Fergusson's Illustrated Handbook of Architecture, vol. ii. p. 879. It is said that Wren used often to look at the beautiful roof of King's College Chapel, Cam- bridge, and say he would build such another if anyone would tell him where to put the first stone. HO 67/? CHRISTOPHER WREN. thin shell of stone, very geometrically made.' The tower leant much to one side, and was propped with arches and buttresses, so as to block the view from the west end. Upon this tower, which he despairingly calls ' a heap of deformities,' there had been formerly a tall, thin, wooden spire, which was destroyed by lightning. For this he wished to substitute ' a dome or rotunda, and upon the cupola for outward ornament, a lantern with a spring top to rise proportionately.' He hints that when the dome was finished the rest of the cathedral should be harmonised with it, almost impossible though the task appeared. He expected great difference of opinion, and that ' some would aim at a greater magnificence than the age would afford, and some might fall so low as to think of piecing up the old fabric here with stone, there with brick, and covering all faults with a coat of plaster, to leave it still to posterity as an object of charity.' The miserable state of the building is implied in the epitaph of its Dean, Dr. Barwick, who in 1664, 'Inter sacras JEdis Paulinae ruinas reponit suas (utrasque resurrecturas securus) > . 1 Another work upon which Wren was engaged was the Sheldonian Theatre at Oxford. Sheldon, who succeeded Archbishop Juxon in the see of Canterbury in 1663, was determined to free S. Mary's Church from the profane uses to which it was put when the various ' Acts ' were kept there, and any kind of jesting 1 ' Among the sacred ruins of S. Paul's Church laid down his own (sure that both will rise again).' Sancroft, afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury, succeeded him. SHELDONIAN THEATRE. 141 and buffoonery was considered allowable. He had had experience of Wren in the discussions about S. Paul's, and now engaged him as architect. The building is too well known to need a description ; the roof was reckoned a triumph of skill because of ' the contrivance of supporting the same without the help of any beam, it being entirely kept up by braces and screws; and is the subject of an excellent mathema- tical treatise by that prodigy of the age, Dr. Wallis.' l It was six years building, and cost 25,ooo/. Evelyn, with whom Wren had often discussed the plans, went to Oxford on purpose to be present at the opening on July 9, 1669. ' In the morning,' he says, ' was celebrated the Encenia of the New Theater .... it was resolved to keep the present Act in it and celebrate its dedication with the greatest splendor and formalitie that might be, and therefore drew a world of strangers and other companie to the Universitie from all parts of the nation. The Vice Chancellor, Heads of Houses and Doctors, being seated in magisteriall seates, the Vice Chancellor's chaire and deske, Proctors etc. covered with Brocatall (a kind of Brocade) and cloth of gold ; the Universitie Register read the founder's grant and gift of it to the Universitie upon these solemn occasions. Then followed Dr. South, the Universitie's orator, in an eloquent speech which was very long and not without some malicious and indecent reflections on the Royal Society as under- miners of the Universitie, which was very foolish 1 Oxford^ vol. i. p. 473. Ayliffe. 142 S/R CHRISTOPHER WREN. and untrue, as well as unseasonable. But, to let that pass from an ill-natured man, the rest was in praise of the archbishop and the ingenious architect.' Dr. Plot, the historian of Oxfordshire, who was a member of the Royal Society, in his quaint book gives a careful technical description of the construction of the theatre by Wren, and his assistant, ' Richard Frogley, an able carpenter.' During the years that the theatre was building Wren did not intermit his attendance at the Royal Society ; amongst other inventions he produced a machine for drawing in perspective, which was exhibited at one of the meetings. A frightful interruption came to these and to all other pursuits in London. In 1665, the plague, which had more than once afflicted England, broke out with fearful force in London, where the dark narrow streets with their houses meeting overhead, and the foul state of the entire town, gave every encouragement to its ravage's. Pepys, who stayed in London all through the worst time of the plague, gives many a record of this visitation. 1 ' June jt/i. The hottest day that ever I felt in my life. This day, much against my will I did in Drury Lane see two or three houses marked with a red cross upon the doors and " Lord have mercy upon us ! " writ there ; which was a sad sight to me, being the first of the kind that, to my remembrance, I ever saw. 1 August \bth. To the Exchange, where I have 1 Diary, vol. ii. p. 273, et sey., ed. 1828. THE PLAGUE. 143 not been a great while. But Lord ! how sad a sight it is to see the streets empty of people and very few upon the 'Change ! Jealous of every door that one sees shut up lest it should be the plague, and about us two shops in three, if not more, generally shut up. ' September yd (Lord's Day). Up ; and put on my coloured silk suit very fine, and my new periwigg, bought a good while since, and durst not wear because the plague was in Westminster when I bought it ; and it is a wonder what will be the fashion after the plague is done as to periwiggs, for nobody will dare to buy any haire for fear of the infection, that it had been cut off the heads of people dead of the plague. My Lord Brouncker, Sir J. Minnes and I up to the Vestry ' (he was then at Greenwich) ' at the desire of the justices of the peace, in order to the doing of something for the keeping of the plague from growing ; but Lord ! to consider the madness of the people of the town who will, because they are forbid, come in crowds along with the dead corpses to see them buried ; but we agreed on some orders for the prevention thereof. Among other stories, one was very passionate, me- thought, of a complaint brought against a man in the town for taking a child from London from an infected house. Alderman Hooker told us it was the child of a very able citizen in Gracious Street ' (Gracechurch Street), ' a saddler, who had buried all the rest of his children with the plague, and himself and his wife being now shut up and in despair of 144 -SM CHRISTOPHER WREN. escaping, did desire only to save the life of this little child ; and so prevailed to have it received stark naked into the arms of a friend who brought it, having put it into fresh clothes, to Greenwich, where upon hearing the story we did agree it should be permitted to be received and kept in the town.' So the days went on and the grass waved in Whitehall Court, and to quote Pepys again : ' Lord ! how everybody's looks and discourse in the streets is of death and nothing else, and few people going up and down, that the town is like a place distressed and forsaken/ None but those whom absolute necessity kept in London stayed in the infected air ; the works at S. Paul's were stopped ; all meetings and lectures ceased, with good reason, since to gather people together was but to spread the infection. Christopher Wren profited by the cessation of his London work, to travel abroad. Before going he had much to settle ; to help Mr. Evelyn find a tutor, ' a perfect Grecian and more than commonly mathe- matical,' for his son. This youth went two years later, at the age of thirteen, to Trinity College, Oxford, ' being newly out of long coates.' Wren's Oxford Professorship, and his works, both there and at Cambridge, required to be set in good order before he could go. At Oxford he was engaged on the repairs of Trinity College, for his friend Dr. Bathurst. 1 On June 22, 1665, Wren writes to them as follows : 1 Dr. Ralph Bathurst, born 1620, educated at Coventry and Oxford. 1 THE WORLD GOVERNED BY WORDS! 145 ' My honoured Friend, I am convinced with Machi- avel or some unlucky fellow, 'tis no matter whether I quote true, that the world is generally governed by words. I perceive the name of a quadrangle will carry it with those whom you say may possibly be your benefactors, though it be much the worse situ- ation for the chambers, and the beauty of the college, and of the particular pile of building. If I had skill in enchantment to represent the pile, first in one view, then in another, I should certainly make them of my opinion ; or else I will appeal to Mons. Mansard or Signer Bernini, both of which I shall see at Paris within this fortnight.' ' But, to be sober, if anybody, as you say, will pay for a quadrangle, there is no dispute to be made ; let them have a quadrangle, though a lame one somewhat like a three-legged table.' . . . Some technical details for the builder follow, and then : ' You need not use any apologies to me, for I must beg you to believe you can command me in things of greater moment, and that I love to serve you as your most faithful and affectionate Friend and Servant, ' CHRISTOPHER WREN/ The College was repaired by Sir Thomas Pope, it having been left in a very ruinous condition, but the Was ordained, but during the rebellion maintained himself by the practice of medicine. He was a fellow of the Royal Society, and in 1688 its president. He was president of Trinity from 1644 till his death in 1704. He was Dean of Wells, and was offered the bishopric, but refused it as taking him from his college and hindering the improvements he was making there. Evelyn speaks highly of his preaching and his admirable parts and learning.' L 1 46 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. ornamental part is due to Dr. Bathurst, aided by munificent Archbishop Sheldon and other old members of the College. He was making considerable additions to Trinity College at Cambridge : to this date belongs the library, which he added to the beautiful western Quadrangle known as Nevile's Court. ' A building,' said Wren, in a letter to the Master of Trinity, ' of that consideration you go about, deserves good care in the design and able workmen to perform it ; and that he who takes the general management upon him may have a prospect of the whole, and make all parts inside and outside corre- spond well together.' Very full directions and six drawings follow, ex- plaining the plan and its details. ' I suppose,' he ends, ' you have good masons ; how- ever, I would willingly take a farther pains to give all the mouldings in great ; we are scrupulous in small matters and you must pardon us, the architects are as great pedants as critics and heralds.' It was not until midsummer that Wren was able to start on his journey : he went at once to Paris to the Earl of S. Albans, the English ambassador, to whom he had letters. Lord S. Albans had lived at Paris in great ease and luxury all through the Rebellion, far more so, Evelyn indignantly says, than had the King. He was supposed to be privately married to the Queen Dowager, Henrietta Maria. He was what was then called a great virtuoso, a friend of WREN AT PARIS. 147 Cowley and of other wits, and entertained Wren with much courtesy and hospitality. Wren's name was, in itself, a sufficient introduction to the scientific men and philosophers of the city, in whose society he took great pleasure. He had long been a Member of the Order of Freemasons, and had distinguished himself by the atten- tion he gave to the lodges under his care : at the time of his journey to France he was Deputy Grand Master under Earl Rivers ; no doubt he availed himself to the full of the opportunities which Freemasonry afforded him for observing the details of the work and becoming acquainted with the workmen, the architects, and the sculptors, whom Louis XIV. had brought in great numbers to Paris. It would have been interesting had Wren left us a record of his impressions of Paris from a political point of view. It was the brief interval of peace between England and France before the war of the Nether- lands. Louis XIV., climbing upwards to the zenith of his brilliant reign, keeping the supreme power in his own hands since Mazarin's death (in 1661), with the wise Colbert for his financier, surrounded by all the great captains, statesmen, wits and artists who made up the ' Siecle de Louis XIV.,' must have been a very interesting subject for the observation of a philosopher like Wren, whose youth had been passed among terrible political storms. There is, however, but one slight hint in his journal, but one suggestion that he discerned the true value of much of the glitter and veneer of universal, if temporary, success. Pascal, 1 2 148 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. with whom he had corresponded, and between whose brief career and his own there is a curious resem- blance, had died three years before Wren took his one foreign journey. The 'Academic Royale des Sciences,' which had just received the formal sanction of Louis XIV., had begun much like the English Royal Society, by small meetings and conferences at Paris amongst scientific men, and in these conferences, Pascal, while very young, had taken a brilliant place. His father, Etienne Pascal, when he found it a vain attempt to withhold mathematical science from his son, cultivated the boy's genius to the utmost, beyond, perhaps, what the very feeble physical frame could bear. One cannot doubt that Wren was introduced to this society, and took an interest in its discussions, though his attention seems most of all to have been given to architecture. In a journal written for a Dr. Bateman, the friend who gave him the letters to Lord S. Albans, he says : ' I have busied myself in surveying the most esteemed Fabrics of Paris, and the country round ; the Louvre for a while was my daily object where no less than a thousand hands are constantly employed in the works ; some in laying mighty Foundations, some in raising the stones, columns, and entablements &c. with vast stones, by great and useful engines, others in carving, inlaying of marbles, plaistering, paint- ing, gilding &c., which altogether makes a School of Architecture, the best probably at this day in THE LOUVRE. 149 Europe. The college of the Four Nations, 1 is usually admired, but the Artist had purposely set it ill-favouredly that he might shew his wit in struggling with an ill-convenienced situation. An Academy of Painters, Sculptors, Architects and the chief Artificers of the Louvre, meet every first and last Saturday of the month. Mons. Colbert, Surin- tendant, comes to the works of the Louvre every Wednesday, and if business hinders not, Thursday. The Workmen are paid every Sunday duly. Mons. Abbe Charles introduced me to the acquaint- ance of Bernini, 2 who showed me his designs of the Louvre, and of the King's Statue. Abbe Bruno 1 Wren refers to the University of Paris, which was divided into four faculties arts (letters and science), theology, civil and canon law, and medicine. The faculty of arts was divided into four nations. That of France divided again into five provinces or tribes, that of Picardy divided in the same way, that of Normandy, and that of Germany which was divided into two tribes, that of the continents (divided into two provinces), and that of .the islanders, which included Great Britain and Ireland. Dictionnaire Historique de la France, par L. Lalanne. 2 Gio. Bernini was born at Naples 1 598 and was a great sculptor as well as architect. He made a bust of Charles I. of England after a picture by Vandyke. When the bust was carried to the king's house at Chelsea his Majesty with a train of nobles went to view it, and as they were viewing it a hawk flew over their heads with a partridge in his claw which he had wounded to death. Some of the partridge's blood fell on the neck of the bust, where it always remained without being wiped off. This bust, with the picture from which it was taken, is thought to have perished in the fireat Whitehall, 1697. Biographical History, vol. ii. p. 88. Grainger. Bernini was splendidly received at Paris and employed in several works of sculpture, among which was a bust of Louis XIV., probably the one to which Wren refers. His design for the Louvre was accepted, and he had just begun to work it out at the time Wren wrote, but Colbert and the two Perraults stirred up so many difficulties that Bernini aban- doned the task, and the Louvre was left in the hands of Claude Perrault. Bernini returned to Rome and died there in 1680. ISO SIR CHRISTOPHER WREtf. keeps the curious rarities of the Duke of Orleans' library, well filled with excellent Intaglios, medals, books of Plants and Fowls in miniature. Abbe Burdelo keeps an Academy at his house for Philosophy every Monday afternoon. But I must not think to describe Paris, and the numerous observables there in the compass of a short letter. The King's Houses I could not miss, Fontainbleau has a stately wildness and vastness suitable to the Desert it stands in. ' The antique mass of the Castle of S. Germains and the hanging gardens are delightfully surprising (I mean to any man of judgement), for the pleasures below vanish away in the breath that is spent in ascending. The Palace, or if you please the Cabinet, of Versailles call'd me twice to view it; the mix- tures of brick, stone, blue tile and gold make it look like a rich livery : not an inch within but is crowded with little curiosities of ornaments : the women as they make here the language and fashions and meddle with Politics and Philosophy, so they sway also in Architecture ; works of Filgrand and little Knacks are in great vogue ; but Building certainly ought to have the attribute of Eternal and therefore the only thing uncapable of new Fashions. The masculine furniture of Palais Mazarine pleased me much better, where is a great and noble collection of antique Statues and Bustoes, (many of porphyry), good Basso-relievos ; excellent pictures of the great masters, fine Arras, true Mosaics, besides pieces de 'TO PRY INTO TRADES AND ARTS} 151 Raport 1 in compartiments and pavements, vases of porcelain painted by Raphael, and infinite other rarities. The best of which now furnish the glorious appartment of the Queen Mother at the Louvre which I saw many times. After the incomparable villas of Vaux and Maisons, I shall name but Ruel, Coutances, Chilly, Essoane, St. Maur, St. Mande, Issy, Meudon, Rincy, Chantilly, Verneuil, Liancour, all which, and I might add many others, I have surveyed, and that I might not lose the impressions of them, I shall bring you all France on paper. Bernini's design of the Louvre I would have given my skin for ; but the old reserved Italian gave me but a few minutes' view ; it was five designs on paper, for which he hath received as many thousand pistoles. I had only time to copy it in my fancy and memory, and shall be able, by discourse and a crayon, to give you a tolerable account of it. I have purchased a great deal of taille-douce, that I might give our countrymen examples of ornaments and grotesques, in which the Italians themselves confess the French to excel. I hope I shall give you a very good account of all the best artists of France ; my busi- ness now is to pry into trades and arts. I put myself into all shapes to humour them ; it is a comedy to me, and though sometimes expenseful, I am yet loth to leave it.' There follows a long list of what he calls ' the most noted artisans within my knowledge or acquaintance,' in which is many a famous name, Bernini, Poussin, Mignard, Mansard, 1 i.e. Mosaic, t$2 J7/? CHRISTOPHER WREtf. &c., and then he says, ' My Lord Berkeley returns to England at Christmas, when I propose to take the opportunity of his company, and by that time to perfect what I have on the anvil observations on the present state of architecture, arts, and manu- factures in France.' With the great men Latin was probably the com- mon tongue, but with the artizans he must have talked in French, and have either possessed or acquired no small mastery of the language and of the technical terms of their various trades. The ' observations ' were either never hammered into the shape Wren wished, or else were subsequently lost or copied by someone else, as frequently happened to one so careless of his own fame as was Wren. In January 1666, the English Ambassador was recalled from Paris, and the war began between England, and the Netherlands with France for their ally. Pembroke Chapel was meanwhile completed, and ' being beautified with splendid and decorous furni- ture and amply endowed with an annual revenue, was upon the feast of S. Matthew ' (the Bishop's patron saint) ' 1665, solemnly consecrated and dedi- cated by Bishop Wren in person and by his Epis- copal authority to the honour of Almighty God. A noble and lasting monument of the rare piety and munificence of that great and wise Prelate and in every point accorded to his character, which was so well known that the sole nomination of the founder was a sufficient account of the magnificence of the A THANKOFFER1NG. 153 foundation. Before evening service the exterior or outer chapel and the cloister leading to it (a new fabrick of Sir R. Hitcham's foundation) were by his Lordship also consecrated for places of sepulture for the use of the Society, together with a cell or vault at the East end of the chapel under the altar for a dormitory for his Lordship.' l Bishop Wren must have looked with joy on the completion of his thankoffering, and may have guessed, as he surveyed its beautiful proportions, that he had set his nephew, its young architect, on the road to fame. Very little is told us of the latter years of Wren's Episcopate ; one or two stories are given in the ' Paren- talia ' and then contradicted, but it seems he kept his old firmness. In 1662 he held the second Visitation of his Diocese and the articles of inquiry and directions show no change in his opinions and no deference to Puritan notions. It was by a stretch of his power as Visitor that he admitted Dr. Beaumont to be master of Peterhouse, though the college had nominated two other deserving persons, of whom Cosin was one. The choice proved, in the end, a very wise one. He could be lenient also when he thought it right, and admitted several Fellows of Jesus College who came to him, in some fear of a refusal, for institution. He ' was very fair and civil towards them, despatched them without the usual height of the fees and per- suaded them to studiousness and peace against all 1 Wood. Athena; Oxoniensis, vol. i. p. 735. He used certain pecu- liarities in the Act of Consecration which have been repeated at he consecration of the addition to the chapel, March 25, iSSi. 154 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. animosities.' So says a contemporary letter quoted in the ' Parentalia.' Wren had come home at Christmas to find London comparatively free from the plague, and people gradu- ally returning. The Royal Society, whose meetings had of course ceased during the infection, busied them- selves in investigations as to the plague, and the pos- sible methods of preventing it. It still raged in the country, and especially at Cambridge, driving Isaac Newton from his lectures there to the garden at Woolsthorpe in Lincolnshire, where the idea of the law of gravitation first occurred to his mind. The repair of S. Paul's was again discussed and commissioners appointed in 1666, among whom were Evelyn, Wren, Dean Sancroft, and the then Bishop of London, who was Humphrey Henchman, the early friend of George Herbert. On August 2 yth they inspected the cathedral. Two of the commissioners, Mr. Chichley and Mr. Prat, evidently wished to do as little as possible, declaring, when the nave was proved to lean outwards on both sides, ' it was so built for an effect of the perspective/ and proposing to repair the steeple on its old founda- tions. Wren thought very differently, insisted on new foundations, renewed his former proposal of ' a noble cupola ' which was strongly supported by Evelyn, who had never forgotten the grandeur of S. Peter's just completed when he went to Rome as a young man in 1644. They retired to the Deanery to give their opinions in writing, promising to send estimates of the cost of their several plans. Six days later a new FIRE OF LONDON. 155 P disaster overwhelmed London and solved the question of repairing the cathedral. On the night of September 2nd the Fire of London began ; for three days and four nights it burned unchecked, having gained such strength during the first panic that it could not be beaten back, the sparks constantly kindling new centres of flame. 1 All the skie,' says Evelyn, 1 ' was of a fiery aspect, like the top of a burning oven, and the light seen above forty miles round about for many nights. God grant mine eyes may never behold the like who now saw 10,000 houses all in one flame ; the noise and crackling and thunder of the impetuous flames, the shrieking of women and children, the hurry of people, the fall of towers, houses and churches, was like an hideous storme, and the aire all about so hot and inflam'd that at last one was not able to approch it, so that they were forc'd to stand still and let the flames burn on, which they did for neere two miles in length and one in bredth. The clowds also of smoke were dismall and reached upon computation neere fifty-six miles in length. Thus I left it this afternoone burning, a resemblance of Sodom, or of the last day. ' Sept. 4. The burning still rages and it was now gotten as far as the Inner Temple ; all Fleet Streete, the Old Bailey, Ludgate Hill, Warwick Lane, New- gate, Paules' Chaine, Wading Streete now flaming and most of it reduced to ashes ; the stones of Paules flew like granados, the mealting lead .running 1 Diary, September, 1666. 156 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. downe the streetes in a streame and the very pave- ment glowing with fiery rednesse so as no horse nor man was able to tread them and the demolition had stopped all the passages so as no help could be applied. The Eastern wind still more impetuously driving the flames forward. Nothing but the Al- mighty power of God was able to stop them, for vaine was the help of man.' At last the people were roused to take some steps. King Charles, who showed on this occasion great courage and presence of mind, got by water to the Tower and insisted on the houses near being blown up so as to prevent the flames from reaching the po .' der magazine. Pepys gives a vivid account of the dismay and confusion ; the goods removed and removed again as the fire reached what had been thought to be places of safety ; the rain of fire drops, and the ever-new places in which the fire broke out, and his own difficul- ties of getting anything to eat but the cold remains of his Sunday's dinner ! On September 1 7 he went by water to Greenwich ' seeing the City all the way, a sad sight much fire being in it still.' S. Paul's suffered terribly ; the Portico was split and rent, nothing but the inscription remaining, of which each letter was perfect. The heat had calcined the largest blocks of stone, the Portland stone flew off wherever the flames touched it ; the lead roof (no less than six acres by measure 1 ), melted and fell in, and carrying everything with it in its fall, brp.ke into S. Faith's, the crypt below the choir, 1 Evelyn's Diary, September, 1666. ITS LONG CONTINUANCE. 157 where the books belonging to the Stationers' Hall had been carried for safety. They caught fire and con- tinued burning for a week. The altar and roof above it, though of lead, remained untouched, and one Bishop's tomb. 1 When at length the fire burnt out, the city was a ' ruinous heap,' the air still so hot as almost to singe the hair of those who sought amongst the ruins for some remains of former wealth. In the fields all round were two hundred thousand people of all classes equally destitute, silent from the very greatness of their calamity and asking no relief. The King did his utmost for them, and a proclamation was made for the country to come in and refresh them. Most fortunately the weather was warm and fair. For a few days their stupor lasted, when it was broken into by a general alarm that the Dutch were in the river burning all the shipping. When this was at length appeased, the people flocked back to what had been the city, and either set up little sheds where their houses had been or took refuge with friends whose dwellings were uninjured, so that in four days' time of the hundreds who had thronged the fields not one remained. To rebuild the city was an urgent neces- sity, and while the flames were in parts still burning Wren and Evelyn had both made plans for a new city and presented them to the King. Wren's was the first shown to King Charles, and though there is much resemblance between it and that of Evelyn, yet Wren's 1 That of Robert de Braybrook (Bishop of London 1382 and 1405). The tomb of Donne (Dean of S. Paul's 1621-1631) was not entirely destroyed. 158 577? CHRISTOPHER WREN. is evidently the more useful, as well as the finer plan of the two, and was the one which the King accepted. All persons were agreed that to allow the old, narrow, filthy streets, with their magazines of oil and rosin, and their wooden houses touching each other overhead, to be put back was only to insure another plague and an- other fire, but the manner of rebuilding was in as great dispute as was the origin of the fire. Pepys believed that it was caused by the Dutch, who in the following year did venture into Chatham and burnt several men- of-war as they lay at anchor there ; but the popular idea was that it was caused by the French and the Roman Catholics, and there were plenty ready to swear that they had seen foreigners kindling the flames in fresh places by throwing fire-balls into the houses. Some said it was done by the Puritans, and very few appear to have accepted the theory, probably the true one, that it was caused by the over-heating of a baker's oven. Christopher Wren began his work by having the ruins cleared away. It was no easy task, especially as every now and then the flames would break out anew when the air reached the cellars where they had been smouldering. But it was a mere matter of necessity, as until this was done it was not possible to pass to and fro or take the necessary levels and measurements. He also repaired a portion of the west end of S. Paul's, which best permitted it, for divine service. It was employment enough for one man, but as the evenings grew longer, in the intervals of elaborating his plans DEATH OF BISHOP WREN. 159 for the new city, he returned to the Royal Society and attended all its meetings. Improvements in building naturally occupied much of the Society's attention. Mr. Hooke produced a scheme for a better method of brick-making ; l new models for the London granaries were required, and Wren gave an account of those at Dantzic. On April 24, 1667, his uncle, the Bishop of Ely, died, at the age of eighty-one, at Ely House, in Holborn, which had probably been his chief abode, though he left it on occasions for the work of his diocese and for the consecration of the chapel at Pembroke Hall. Back to his well-loved University, and to the resting-place he had prepared for himself underneath the altar of the chapel, the Bishop's remains were slowly borne during the first bright days of May, attended by ' his children, his alliance, and his family.' The Heralds' College conducted the funeral with full dignity and solemnity. When they reached Cam- bridge the Vice-Chancellor and the whole university met the procession, which was headed by Rouge Dragon, Pursuivant-at-arms, carrying the silver-gilt Crozier, and Norroy, King-at-arms, carrying the silver- gilt Mitre, both of which, as well as a pair of massive silver altar candlesticks, the Bishop had provided a year before. On May 9, with the same attendance, 1 The bricks, which were temporarily used in the building of S. Paul's, were of so good a quality that Richard Jennings, Wren's master carpenter, bought and transported them by water to Henley-on-Thames (his native town), and with them built a house a mile from Henley, which, bearing the name of ' Badgemore,' is still to be seen. The bricks of which it is built are often admired. 160 5Y/? CHRISTOPHER WREN. which included ' twenty-four scholars of S. John's, Peter House, and Pembroke who were his relations,' 1 the coffin was borne to Pembroke Chapel frotn the Registry, at the end of the Regent's Walk, where it had lain in state for two days, and after Evening Service had been said was laid in a ' coffin of one fair whole stone,' in the vault of the chapel. Dr. Pearson pronounced a Latin oration over it, recalling the chief events of the Bishop's long and troubled life, describing his high-minded character, his resolute self- denial, and contrasting his conduct in never seeking, or by the least word asking, for promotion, but rather being besought to accept it, with those who gaped for church preferment, and rather snatched honours than received them. Dr. Pearson dwelt on his liberality to the University, on his never enriching his family out of the revenues of the sees he had ruled ; and paid a warm tribute to the courage and faith with which he had fought for the Church, and either alone, or amongst very few, had understood her discipline and dared to revive it. Of the four sons who survived the Bishop, Matthew, the eldest, early attracted notice by an answer to Harrington's ' Commonwealth of Oceana ' and by a pamphlet ' Monarchy asserted,' a vindication of a former work written in 1659. He was highly thought of by the Royalists, and was a member of the Parlia- ment which met in 1661. He was Lord Clarendon's secretary, remained loyal to him during his unmerited disgrace, and was then taken by the Duke of York as 1 Desiderata Curt'osa, p. 545. Peck. BISHOP WREN'S SONS. 161 his secretary. Matthew remained with the Duke until 1672 ; when he died and was buried in the vault at Pembroke Chapel. He had taken a share in most of the political events of his day, always with honour and credit. Thomas, the next brother, left the profession of medicine, received holy orders, and was given the Rectory of Littlebury in Essex by his father; a preferment that he held until his death in 1680. Bishop Wren also made him Archdeacon of Ely. He was a great musician and a member of the Royal Society. The two younger sons, Charles and William, were both Oxford scholars, and received degrees at the Restoration. Charles sat for Cambridge in the Parliament of 1685, called by James II. on his acces- sion. All these three younger sons received degrees in 1660, with many others who had been ejected by the Parliamentary Visitors in 1648-9. William Wren, who was made a knight, was a barrister of the Middle Temple, and enjoyed the questionable advantage of Judge Jeffreys' acquaintance. Jeffreys, then Lord Chancellor, writing to Pepys l in 1687, says : ' My most Hon ed Friend, The bearer, Capt. Wren, came to mee this evening, with a strong fancy that a recommendation of myne might at least entitle him to your favourable reception ; His civillities to my brother and his relation to honest Will Wren, and you know who else, emboldens me to offer my re- quest on his behalfe. I hope he has served our M r . well, and is capable of being an object of the King's favour in his request ; however, I am sure I 1 Pepys' Diary, vol. v. p. 326. M 162 SfK CHRISTOPHER WREN. shall be excused for this impertinency, because I will gladly, in my way, embrace all opportunities where- in I may manifest myselfe to be what I here assure you I am, Sir, ' Your most entirely affectionate ' Friend and Servant, 'JEFFREYS, C.' William Wren died in 1689 and was buried in the Temple Church. There is no mention of the marriage of any of the Bishop's children, and respect- ing the daughters I can find no record whatever, so it seems that that branch of the Wren family died out. Captain Wren was probably one of the Durham Wrens, or of those who lived at Withibrook in War- wickshire and are mentioned by Dugdale. CHAPTER VII. 1668-1673. PATCHING s. PAUL'S BANCROFT'S LETTERS WREN'S EXAMINATION OF s. PAUL'S SALISBURY CATHEDRAL LONDON AS IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN LETTER TO FAITH COGHILL WREN MARRIES HER TEMPLE BAR S. MARY-LE-BOW ARTILLERY COMPANY GUNPOWDER USED TO REMOVE RUINS. M 2 Methinks already from this chymic flame, I see a city of more precious mold, Rich as the town which gives the Indies name, With silver pav'd, and all divine with gold. Already, labouring with a mighty fate, She shakes the rubbish from her mounting brow, And seems to have renewed her charter's date, Which heaven will till the death of time allow. Dryden, Annus Mirabilis, ccxciii. CHAPTER VII. AFTER the death of Bishop Wren, Christopher was a frequent attendant at the Royal Society, where several experiments were made of raising weights by means of gunpowder, a matter which Wren was anxious to in- vestigate before trying to remove the mass of ruins which had been S. Paul's. Much very tedious work of carting away rubbish and opening roadways still pressed on Wren and his assistants before even the necessary levels could be taken and adjusted or any building could be begun. In spite of Wren's previous statement, and that of Evelyn and Sancroft, in spite of the immense addi- tional damage which the conflagration had caused, attempts were still made to patch up the remains of S. Paul's Cathedral. As has been said, something was done in order to make it possible to hold Divine Service in the ruins, and there Sancroft ministered, and there possibly he preached before the King on the occasion of the solemn fast held for the fire on October 10, I666. 1 Parts of the sermon rise to real eloquence, and he admonishes King Charles and his luxurious Court 1 'Lex Ignea, or the School of Righteousness.' Life of Sancroft vol. ii. p. 355. Doyley. 1 66 SIX CHRISTOPHER WREN. with singular courage and directness. So matters re- mained with the Cathedral until the spring of 1668. Wren was at Oxford, delivering his Astronomy Lectures, when he received the following letter from the Dean of S. Paul's: 1 ' What you whispered in my ear, at your last coming hither, is now come to pass. Our work at the west end of S. Paul's is fallen about our ears. Your quick eye discerned the walls and pillars gone off from their perpendiculars and I believe other de- fects too, which are now exposed to every common observer. About a week since, we being at work about the third pillar from the west end on the south side, which we had new cased with stone, where it was most defective almost up to the chapiter, a great weight falling from the high wall, so disabled the vaulting of the side aisle by it, that it threatened a sudden ruin so visibly that the workmen presently removed, and the next night the whole pillar fell, and carried scaffolds and all to the very ground. ' This breach has discovered to all that look on it two great defects in Inigo Jones' work; one that his new case of stone in the upper walls (massy as it is) was not set upon the upright of the pillars, but upon the core of the groins of the vaulting ; the other that there were no keystones at all to tie it to the old work ; and all this being very heavy with the Roman ornaments on the top of it, and being already 1 Life of Saner oft) vol. i. p. 141. Doyley. 'INDISPENSABLY NECESSARY: 167 so far gone outwards, cannot possibly stand long. In fine, it is the opinion of all men, that we can pro- ceed no farther at the west end. What we are to do next is the present deliberation, in which you are so absolutely and indispensably necessary to us that we can do nothing, resolve on nothing without you.' . . ' You will think fit, I know, to bring with you those excellent draughts and designs you formerly favoured us with ; and, in the mean time, till we enjoy you here, consider what to advise that may be for the satisfaction of his Majesty and the whole nation, an obligation so great and public, that it must be ac- knowledged by better hands than those of ' Your affectionate Friend and Servant, ' W. SANCROFT.' Wren seems to have been unable to come up to London, and to have written an answer to Dean Sancroft reiterating his opinion, while the attempt at repairs continued. At the beginning of July Sancroft wrote to him again : Sir, Yesterday my Lords of Canterbury, London, and Oxford met on purpose to hear your letter read once more, and to consider what is now to be done in order to the repairs of S. Paul's. They unanim- ously resolved, that it is fit immediately to attempt something, and that, without you, they can do nothing. I am therefore commanded to give you an invitation hither in his Grace's name, and the rest of the commissioners, with all speed, that we may 1 68 S/A CHRISTOPHER WREN. prepare something to be proposed to his Majesty (the design of such a quire, at least as may be a congruous part of a greater and more magnificent work to follow) ; and then, for the procuring of con- tributions to defray this, we are so sanguine as not to doubt of it, if we could but once resolve what we would do, and what that would cost ; so that the only part of your letter we demur to, is the method you propound of declaring first what money we would bestow, and then designing something just of that expense : for quite otherwise the way their lordships resolve upon, is to frame a design, handsome and noble, and suitable to all the ends of it, and to the reputation of the city and the nation ; and to take it for granted that money will be had to accomplish it : or, however, to let it lie by, till we have before us a prospect of so much as may reasonably encourage us to begin. ' Thus far I thought good to prepare you for what will be said to you when you come, that you may not be surprised with it : and, if my summons pre- vail not, my lord the Bishop of Oxford hath under- taken to give it you warmer, ore tenus^ the next week, when he intends to be with you, if, at least, you be not come towards us before he arrives, which would be a very agreeable surprise to us all, and especially to your very affectionate, humble Servant, ' W. SANCROFT.' Wren obeyed this intreaty, came up from Oxford, 1 i.e. by word of mouth. THE STATE OF S. PAULS. 169 made a thorough examination of the Cathedral, and wrote a report for the commissioners. ' What time and weather/ he says, ' had left entire in the old and art in the new repaired parts of this great pile of S. Paul's, the calamity of the fire hath so weakened and defaced, that it now appears like some antique ruin of two thousand years' continuance, and to repair it sufficiently will be like the mending of Argo-nairs, 1 scarce anything at last will be left of the old.' He enumerates the various ' decays ' of the building from the date of the fire in Queen Elizabeth's reign which burnt the whole roof and caused 'the spreading out of the walls above ten inches from their true perpendicular' up to the last fire, of which he says ' The second ruins are they that have put the restoration past remedy, the effects of which I shall briefly enumerate. 1 First, the portico is nearly deprived of that excellent beauty and strength which time alone and weather could have no more overthrown than the natural rocks ; so great and good were the materials, and so skilfully were they laid after a true Roman manner. But so impatient is Portland stone of fire that many tons are scaled off and the columns flawed quite through.' Then follows an account of the injuries to the rest of the building, but as they have been already touched on in the extracts from Evelyn's Diary and Bancroft's letters, they shall not be repeated here. 1 Probably a misprint for ' Argo-navis,' referring to the frequent repairs of the Arsro. i/o S/K CHRISTOPHER WREN. ' Having shown in part/ he continues, ' the deplor- able condition of our patient, we are to consult of the cure, if possible art may effect it. And herein we must imitate the physician, who, when he finds a total decay of nature, bends his skill to a palliative to .give respite for the better settlement of the estate of the patient. The question is then, where best to begin this sort of practice ; that is to make a new quire for present use.' The only part of the cathedral where this could be safely and easily done was at the eastern end of the nave : ' Since,' he said, ' we cannot mend this great ruin, we will not disfigure it, but that it shall still have its full motives to work, if possible upon this or the next ages : and yet prove so cheap, that between three and four thousand pounds shall effect it all in one summer. ' And, having with this ease obtained a present cathedral, there will be time to consider of a more durable and noble fabric, to be made in the place of the lower and eastern parts of the Church, when the minds of men, now contracted to many objects of necessary charge, shall by God's blessing be more widened, after a happy restoration, both of the buildings, and the wealth of the city and nation. In the meantime to derive, if not a stream, yet some little drills of charity this way ; or, at least, to preserve that already obtained from being diverted, it may not prove ill-advised to seem to begin some- SALISBURY CATHEDRAL. 171 thing of the new fabric. But I confess this cannot well be put in execution without taking down all that part of the ruin ; which whether it be yet seasonable to do we must leave to our superiors.' Many meetings and much discussion ensued, and Wren's opinion at last prevailed ; the King issued an order in council for taking down the walls at the east end, the old choir, and the tower, and for clearing the ground in order to lay a fresh foundation. While this was being done, Wren prepared sketches and designs for a new S. Paul's. He had also an engage- ment out of London : his friend Dr. Seth Ward, the Bishop of Salisbury, an active member of the Royal Society, asked Wren to survey his beautiful cathedral, which had suffered much in the civil wars, and lately by lightning and tempest. Though the architecture of the cathedral was not of the kind which he considered the best, Wren had too fine a taste, too quick an eye for beauty of form, not to admire it heartily, and in his report he pro- nounced that ' the whole pile was large and magnifi- cent, justly accounted one of the best patterns of the age wherein it was built.' He praised the pillars and mouldings, ' the stately and rich plainness ' to which the architect had trusted. He made a thorough examination of the whole, especially the spire, which had declined to the south-west, and had caused great alarm. Wren was of opinion that the architect had not laid as sufficient foundations, especially under the pillars, as he should have done, considering the marshy nature of the soil, the frequent inundations, the great /1 72 Sffi CHRISTOPHER WREN. weight that the pillars had to bear, and that they themselves were too slight, particularly those under the spire. To prevent further mischief to the spire, he ordered some timbers in it, and in the tower, to be cut away, and put in bands and braces of iron wrought by anchor smiths who were accustomed to great work for ships. He then had a plummet dropped to the pavement, from the highest possible part of the spire, the height of which he reckoned at 404 feet from the ground, to see exactly what the decline was, and ordered this trial to be repeated at certain times to see if the decline increased. When, nearly 200 years later, Mr. Wyatt made the trial, he found that the decline was unaltered, so true had Wren's science proved. Both this year and the previous one had, so far as London was concerned, been taken up by the business of levelling, marking out streets, and adjusting the claims of such as had had houses in the city before the fire. Wren had laid before the King and Parlia- ment a model of the city as he proposed to build it, with full explanations of the details of the design ; the model probably does not exist, but the ground-plan has been preserved, and suggests a London very different to the present one. The street leading up Ludgate Hill, instead of being the confined, winding approach to S. Paul's that it now is, even its crooked picturesqueness marred by the viaduct that cuts all the lines of the Cathedral, gra- dually widened as it approached S. Paul's, and divided LONDON AS IT MIGHT HA VE BEEN. 173 itself into two great streets, ninety feet wide at the least, which ran on either side of the Cathedral, leav- ing a large open space in which it stood. Of the two streets, one ran parallel with the river until it reached the Tower, and the other led to the Exchange, which Wren meant to be the centre of the city, standing in a great piazza, to which ten streets, each sixty feet wide, converged, and around which were placed the Post Office, the Mint, the Excise Office, the Goldsmiths' Hall, and the Ensurance, forming the outside of the piazza. The smallest streets were to be thirty feet wide, ' excluding all narrow, dark alleys without thoroughfares, and courts.' The churches were to occupy commanding positions along the principal thoroughfares, and to be ' designed according to the best forms for capacity and hearing, adorned with useful porticoes and lofty ornamental towers and steeples in the greater parishes. All churchyards, gardens, and unnecessary vacuities, and all trades that use great fires or yield noisome smells to be placed out of town.' He intended that the churchyards should be care- fully planted and adorned, and be a sort of girdle round the town, wishing them to be an ornament to the city, and also a check upon its growth. To burials within the walls of the town he strongly objected, and the experience derived from the year of the plague confirmed his judgment. No gardens are mentioned in the plan, for he had provided, as he thought, sufficiently for the healthiness of the town by his wide streets and numerous open spaces for markets. 174 MX CHRISTOPHER WREN. Gardening in towns was an art little considered in his days, and contemporary descriptions show us that ' vacuities ' were speedily filled with heaps of dust and refuse. The London bank of the Thames was to be lined with a broad quay, along which the halls of the city companies were to be built, with suitable warehouses in between for the merchants, to vary the effect of the edifices. The little stream whose name survives in Fleet Street was to be brought to light, cleansed, and made serviceable as a canal one hundred and twenty feet wide, running much in the line of the present Holborn Viaduct. 1 These were the main features of Christopher Wren's scheme, and had he been allowed to accomplish it, we can imagine what the effect of London might have been without its noisome smells, without its dark crooked lanes, without its worst smoke, its river honoured not only with the handsome quay it has at length obtained, but with a line of beautiful buildings and fair spires, and above all S. Paul's, with an ample space around it, giving free play to its grand propor- tions. Wren, with a perfect knowledge of his own powers, which he considered as dispassionately, and knew as accurately as any matter of mathematical 1 In 1672 a bridge, with a beautiful arch resembling those that cross the canals at Venice, was built over 'the Ditch,' opposite Bridewell Hospital. One or two other bridges were built, and the stream made navigable, but apparently not 'cleansed,' which in time rendered it a nuisance. The bridges were taken down and the stream reduced to a drain in 1765. Ann. Reg., 1765, p. 136. PREOCCUPIED GROUND. 175 science, was ready to undertake and perform his scheme to the uttermost. The difficulties were however considerable : there were the endless quarrels about property, the reluct- ance to part with an old site, and, chief difficulty of all, the utmost hurry of rebuilding in order to house the people before the approaching winter. Pepys 1 says that in April 1667 : ( Moorefields have houses two stories high in them, and paved streets, the city having let leases for seven years, which will be very much to the hinder- ing of the building of the city ; but it was considered that the streets cannot be passable in London till the whole street be built ; and several that had got ground of the city for charity to build sheds on, had got the trick presently to sell that for 6o/. which did not cost them 2O/. to put up ; and so the city being very poor in stock, thought it as good to do it them- selves and therefore let leases for seven years of the ground in Moorefields.' Thus Wren had by no means clear ground on which to work, and an opportunity was forfeited, which, absit omen, may never recur, of making London one of the beautiful cities of the world. Important sanitary improvements were, however, made : the houses were not built of wood ; the principal streets were less narrow ; and, above all, the lingering contagion was burnt away. Nothing less would prob- ably have availed ; but the fire was a cleansing one, and 1 Dt'ary, vol. iv. p. 8. i;6 SfA CHRISTOPHER WREN. left behind it this blessing, that though more than two hundred years have elapsed the plague has not, as yet, reappeared. The Custom House of London was one of the first buildings to be restored, and Wren began it in 1668. It was a stately stone edifice, built in three sides of a square, with an open court in front. The same fate befell this building which had overtaken its pre- decessor; in 1719 it was burnt down. Besides all these architectural and scientific cares, Wren had business of his own on hand, and was at this time engaged to be married to a lady four years younger than himself, whom probably he had known for some time. His bride was Faith, daughter of Sir Thomas Coghill and Elizabeth his wife, who lived at Bletchingdon in Oxfordshire. Sir Thomas was sheriff of the county in 1633, and was knighted at Woodstock in that year, the same in which King Charles was crowned in Scotland. Sir Thomas was a grandson of Marmaduke Coghill, 1 of Coghill, Knaresborough. He married, in 1622, Elizabeth Sutton, the heiress of Horsell and some lands in Surrey. Faith, their daughter, was born on March 17, 1636, and baptized in the same month at Bletchingdon by her relation the Rev. John Viell, the then rector. It seems likely that Wren made her acquaintance while both were children when staying with his sister Susan and her husband, 1 The Coghills of Glen Barrahane, county Cork, are descended from the elder branch of this family. Captain Coghill, who died with Lieutenant Melville, having carried off the colours from the battle of Isandula, January 1879, was the eldest son of the present head of the family. FAITH COGHILL. 177 Dr. William Holder, at Bletchingdon Rectory. It may have been Faith who comforted him when, on June 3, 1656, they laid Dean Wren in the chancel of Bletch- ingdon Church. One letter to Faith Coghill from her lover, exists among the curious autographs of the ' Parentalia,' l its delicate, finished and yet firm writing, eminently characteristic of Christopher Wren : it is as follows ' Madam, The artificer having never before mettwith a drowned watch, like an ignorant physician has been soe long about the cure that he hath made me very unquiet that your commands should be soe long deferred ; however, I have sent the watch at last and envie the felicity of it, that it should be soe neer your side, and soe often enjoy your Eye, and be con- sulted by you how your time shall passe while you employ your hand in your excellent workes. But have a care of it, for I put such a Spell into it that every Beating of the Ballance will tell you 'tis the pulse of my Heart which labours as much to serve you and more trewly than the watch ; for the watch I believe will sometimes lie, and sometimes perhaps be idle and unwilling to goe, having received so much injury by being drenched in that briny bath, that I dispair it should ever be a trew servant to you more. But as for me (unlesse you drown me too in my teares) you may be confident I shall never cease to be, ' Your most affectionate humble servant, ' CHR. WREN. ' June 14. 1 Never before printed. N 178 SJA CHRISTOPHER WREN. 1 1 have put the watch in a box that it might take noe harm, and wrapt it about with a little leather, and that it might not jog, I was fain to fill up the corners either with a few shavings or wast paper.' On December 7, 1669, Christopher Wren and Faith Coghill were married in the Temple Church in London. Of their married life there is absolutely no record ; they probably lived chiefly in London, as Wren had a house in Scotland Yard, which went with the office of Surveyor- General. One of Wren's early works was the rebuilding, on a somewhat larger scale, of the Royal Exchange. 'Charles II. went to the Exchange with his kettle- drums and trumpets tD lay the first stone of the new building of the Exchange on the 23rd of October 1667.' * Wren's own wish had been, as has been said, to make it the nave or centre of the town, in which case he meant to contrive it after the form of a Roman Forum with double porticoes. Thwarted in this, he restored it as much as possible to what it had previously been, replacing the statue of Sir Thomas Gresham, the only thing in the building uninjured by the Fire. It is curious that this restoration should have begun just a hundred years from the time when Queen Elizabeth was feasted by Sir Thomas Gresham at his house, visited the new building, and caused it to be pro- claimed ' the Royal Exchange ' by the sound of the trumpet. The rebuilding was very quickly performed, though 1 Pepys' Diary, vol iv. p. 241. TEMPLE BAR. 179 at considerable cost. 1 Readers of the Spectator'* 1 will remember Addison's fine description of the Exchange, and ' the grand scene of business which gave him an infinite variety of solid and substantial entertain- ments.' Next came Temple Bar, which was begun in 1670, and finished in 1672. It was built of Portland stone, and had in its four niches statues of James I. and Anne of Denmark on the west side, Charles I. and Charles II. on the other. 3 Blackened and defiled as it was, and disfigured by the neighbouring houses, it was one of the picturesque, characteristic buildings of London, now disappearing with alarming rapidity, and had seen many a generation pass in triumph or in sorrow under its archway. The thanksgiving for the Prince of Wales's recovery (1872) was the last histori- cal spectacle with which Temple Bar was connected. On that occasion the City was moved to wipe off some of the smoke of two hundred years, and to let Temple Bar be seen somewhat as it must have been when the great architect finished it, as the entrance to a city which, in spite of all drawbacks, might be fairly called his creation. Wren attempted to prosecute his design for the quay along the northern bank of the Thames, but the ground was being rapidly encroached upon by build- ings, some few of which were tolerable, but the greater 1 This building was destroyed by fire 1838, and rebuilt from designs by Mr. Tite 1844. * Spectator, vol. i. No. 69. 3 They were the best work of John Bushnell, an eccentric and half- crazy sculptor, who died in 1701. N 2 i8o SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN. part unsightly. Various interests ; the immense water traffic, doubled, one can believe, at a time when the city streets were still impassable ; the uncertain support given by the King all combined to defeat his plan. Could he now walk along that glorious achieve- ment the Embankment, what would not his feelings be on seeing the hideous buildings which it has re- vealed ! The Surveyor-General's office was one which en- tailed endless work. There was not a street laid down, hardly a house built, in any part of the town, without the surveyor being first consulted ; now about ' a parcel of ground bought by Colonel Panton ' (the present Panton Street, S.W.) ; now about the houses pulled down for the safety of Whitehall during the Fire. Into every case Wren made careful inquiry, visiting the places himself, and insisting on the buildings being of stone or brick, with proper paving in the streets, and having a due regard to health. In spite of his care several wretched buildings were put up in places which, as a few surviving names testify, were then fields near the City. When Wren found that the owners persisted in erecting such shabby buildings he presented a petition to the King, as follows : ' To the King's Most Excellent Majesty. The humble petition of Christopher Wren, sheweth. That there are divers buildings of late erected, and many foundations laid, and more contrived in Dog's Fields, Windmill Fields, and the fields adjoining to Soe