The Love Letters of Mr. H. fc? Miss R. ^JUUUv^ The *Love-Lettersof Mr. H. ftf Miss R. ,1775-1779, EDITED BY GILBERT BURGESS CHICAGO STONE &T KIMBALL MDCCCXCV c INTRODUCTION THE strange and pathetic story that is told in the love letters that passed between Mr. Hackman and Miss Reay, excited widespread attention and sympathy during the spring of the year 1779, and interest in the affair was revived in the following year by the publication of an anonymous book in which some of these letters, in a garbled form, were inserted. The originals, or copies of the originals for Hackman was sufficiently romantic to have kept copies of his own letters were given to Kearsly, the publisher, by Mr. Frederick Booth, Hackman's brother-in-law, in consequence of Kearsly having issued a pamphlet, on the 24th of April, 1779, called " The Case and Memoirs of the late Revd. Mr. James Hackman," which was full of errors. In the Public Advertiser of the 24th of Introduction April, 1779, Booth, in view of the advertised publication of the " Case and Memoirs " by Kearsly, announced positively that no materials for a life of Hackman could possibly be obtained except through him, as all the necessary letters and documents were in his possession. Croft's edition of the letters was issued by the same publisher in the spring of the following year. It is not quite clear whether Booth was approached by Kearsly or by Croft; but that he (Booth) was satisfied with the latter's work is evident from the fact that it elicited no further pro- test from him. Sir Herbert Croft, Bart., was born at Dunster Park, Berkshire, on November i, 1751. In March, 1771, he matriculated at University College, Oxford, 1 where Scott afterwards Lord Stowell was his tutor. 2 He then entered Lincoln's Inn, but want of means did not allow him to continue in the profession of the law, so in 1782 he returned to Oxford, and decided for the Church. In April, 1785, he took the degree of B.C.L., and in 1786 he received the vicarage of 1 Nichols' " Literary Illustrations," v. 202. 2 " Diet. Nat. Biog." (Stephen.) vi Introduction Prittlewell, 1 in Essex. During his sojourn at Lincoln's Inn, he wrote many tracts and pamphlets; he also tried to compile an English dictionary, but he found that ;ioo a year the amount he had available for that purpose was hardly sufficient. He also wrote the life of Young for Johnson's series of the Lives of the Poets. 2 Croft was somewhat eccentric in the manage- ment of his finances, and was always begging money or preferment from his friends ; there is a letter in the British Museum 3 from him to Bishop Douglas, 4 hi which he complains of having been cold-shouldered by Pitt, whose favour he had tried to gain by offering 1 Gentleman's Magazine, 1816, pt. i. 470. 2 Among Croft's other works were : "A Brother's Advice to his Sisters," 1775. "Fanaticism and Treason," "The Literary Fly," 1780. "The Abbey of Kilhampton," 1780 a series of anti- cipatory epitaphs upon prominent living personages. "Sunday Evenings," 1784, religious discourses, which Dr. Johnson disapproved of on account of their levity of style (Boswell's Johnson, Morley's edition, iv. 231), and a curious French work, " Horace eclairci par la ponctuation," Paris, 1810. 3 Egerton MSS. 2185, fol. 172. 4 John Douglas, Bishop of Salisbury. (Gent. Mag. 1807, pt. i. 475.) Introduction to insert verses in favour of that politician in a book he was writing. There is also a letter, 1 dated i3th of October, 1796, to Bishop Douglas' son, the Rev. W. Douglas, written from Exeter Gaol, "the common prison ^<&/ hoc approbria I " as Croft says, where he was imprisoned for a debt of ^40, which he hopes Mr. Douglas will send at once. Croft subsequently lived in France with the eccentric Lady Mary Hamilton. On the death of Chatterton, Croft ob- tained from the poet's sister, Mrs. Newton, his letters and manuscripts, and, foreseeing that the Hackman-Reay correspondence would have a large sale, he decided to in- clude the Chatterton matter in the volume, which he entitled "Love and Madness." He clumsily put his papers into the form of a letter from Hackman, which was marked No. 49 in the original book, and is included in the Appendix to the present volume. The difference in the style of this letter from that of all the others was so apparent that suspicion fell upon the authenticity of other parts of the volume. 1 Egerton MSS. 2186, fol. 88-93. viii Introduction John Nichols 1 mentions " Love and Madness " as having passed through seven editions. "These letters," he continues, "are given as the correspondence of Mr. Hackman and Miss Reay They are enlivened with a variety of anecdotes, chiefly of a literary kind. Among other miscellaneous matters, the story of that extraordinary genius, Thomas Chatterton, is introduced at great length, with critical ob- servations on his writings j an account of his publication of ' Poems,' said to have been written by one Rowley, a monk, about 300 years ago ; of his other schemes of author- ship, and, finally, of his unhappy exit, in the eighteenth year of his age If this be all 'borrowed personage,' as Mr. Walpole expressed it, it is so ingenious a fiction, that the author will be praised, perhaps, for his abilities even by those who may find themselves inclined to impeach his honesty." In the Monthly Magazine for November, 1799, Robert Southey brought a charge against Croft of having obtained the papers and letters relating to Chatterton from the 1 " Literary Illustrations," v. 203. ix Introduction unfortunate poet's sister, Mrs. Newton, under false pretences. Croft, who was at that time in Denmark, sent a very foolish and evasive reply to the same Magazine, 1 in which he said that he must first arrange Southey's abuse, for that gentleman wrote prose some- what like bad poetry, and poetry somewhat like bad prose. He entirely ignored the main charge brought against him, and his vulgar attack upon Southey brought him justly into contempt among the literary men of the day. The Rev. Charles Cuthbert Southey, who edited his father's " Life and Correspondence," writes to Grosvenor C. Bedford, upon this subject. " Sir Herbert Croft had obtained possession from Mrs. Newton (Chatterton's sister) of all her brother's letters and MSS. under promise of speedily returning them; instead of which, some months afterwards, he incorporated and published them in a pamphlet, entitled ' Love and Madness.' /" At the use thus surreptitiously made of her brother's writings, Mrs. Newton more than 1 Gentleman's Magazine, February, March and April, 1800. x Introduction once remonstrated j but, beyond the sum of ;io, she could obtain no redress. Mr. Cottle l and my father now took the matter up, and the former wrote to Sir H. Croft, pointing out to him Mrs. Newton's reasonable claim, and urging him by a timely concession to prevent that publicity which otherwise would follow. " He received no answer ; and my father then determined to print by subscription all Chatterton's works, including those ascribed to Rowley, for the benefit of Mrs. Newton and her daughter. He accordingly sent proposals to the Monthly Magazine^ in which he detailed the whole case between Mrs. Newton and Sir Herbert Croft, and published their respective letters. The public sympathised rightly on the occasion, for a handsome subscription followed. Sir Herbert Croft was residing in Denmark at the time these proposals were published, and he re- plied to my father's statement by a pamphlet full of much personal abuse." However, Mr. Cottle and Southey pub- lished the edition in three volumes 8vo, and the editors had the satisfaction of paying over 1 A well-known Bristol bookseller, xi Introduction to Mrs. Newton and her daughter upwards of 3- Southey again brought charges against Croft in the Gentlemen's Magazine for March 1800. He says "Sir Herbert does not deny his promises to the family of after assistance, nor that when Mrs. Newton applied for it, he required a certificate of her character from the Clergyman of the Parish." In a note to the ninth edition of " Love and Madness," Croft excuses himself for having pretended that Mr. Hackman had visited Bristol to find out facts about Chat- terton, by referring to an extract from the fourteenth letter in " Love and Madness." The passage he mentions is as follows : " Robinson Crusoe now what nature ! It affects us throughout, exactly in the way you mentioned. But, shall I finish my disserta- tion ? come as writing to you gives me so much pleasure, and as I cannot do anything to you but write this morning, I know you will excuse me. Did you ever hear to what Crusoe owed his existence ? You remember Alexander Selkirk's strange sequestration at Juan Fernandez. It is mentioned, I believe, in Walter's account of Anson's voyage, when xii Introduction Captain Woodes Rogers met with him and brought him to England, he employed the famous Daniel de Foe to revise his papers. That fertile genius improved upon the materials, and composed the celebrated story of Robinson Crusoe. The consequence was that Selkirk, who soon after made his appear- ance in print, was considered as a bastard of Crusoe, with which spurious offspring the press too often teems. In De Foe, un- doubtedly, this was not honest. Had Selkirk given him his papers, there could have been no harm in working them up his own way. I can easily conceive a writer making his own use of a known fact, and filling up the outlines which have been sketched by the bold and hasty hand of fate. A moral may be added, by such means, to a particular incident; characters may be placed in their just and proper lights; mankind may be amused (and amusements, sometimes, pre- vent crimes), or, if the story be criminal, mankind may be bettered, through the channel of their curiosity. But I would not be dis- honest, like De Foe ; nor would I pain the breast of a single individual connected with this story." xiii Introduction Yet Croft, who thus denounces Defoe, announced subsequently that he himself had acted with precisely the same dishonesty in the matter of Mr.Hackman's correspondence. A further light is thrown upon the matter by an advertisement to the eighth edition of "The Case and Memoirs;" the author, who, on the evidence of a rhymed lampoon in one of the papers of the day, was one Manasseh Dawes, 1 a barrister and literary hack, says that, being a gentleman, he wishes to keep that character inviolate; conse- quently, he thinks it necessary to declare that all the facts are genuine, as he will testify and explain, if necessary, on an application to him at Mr. Kearsly's (the publisher), and he hopes that, therefore, his numerous readers will not now suppose that he has " intruded anything on the public with intent to catch the penny of curiosity, at the expense of truth and candour," When this was written Kearsly had pos- session of the real facts of the case, and was able to invite investigation. The enormous success of "Love and Madness" tempted Croft to declare him- 1 Public Advertiser, June 3, 1779. xiv Introduction self the author of the Chatterton excerpt, and also to hint that of the entire work only the outline was true. The word out- line is easily expansible, and, considering that the letter about Chatterton, and two or three other obvious additions, formed half the volume, he was, perhaps, justified in claiming his portion. Croft says that he dedicates the ninth edition to Johnson, because the Doctor had expressed his appre- ciation of the work. But Boswell records 1 that Johnson censured and much disapproved of " Love and Madness," on account of the mingling of the fact with the fiction that is to say, the inclusion of the Chatterton papers among the Hackman-Reay correspondence. As several of the connecting links in the narrative are missing, I have endeavoured to weave the letters into a coherent narrative ; in one or two instances I have been obliged to suppress certain passages, by reason of their having been written at a time when there was a greater license of expression than is permissible nowadays. I have also omitted, in two of the letters, references to Chatterton which Croft introduced to give 1 Boswell's Johnson (Henry Morley), iv. 134. Introduction verisimilitude to his assertion that the long letter containing the life of the poet was written by Hackman. No record of Croft's own work tallies at all with the idea that he created such a romance. But, apart from the controversy, the story and the letters seem to me to be a veritable " human document " of strong interest. And, after exhaustive investigation, I am convinced that such a document is only explainable on the grounds of a real living correspondence and that these letters are, without doubt, those that passed between Hackman and Miss Reay. April, 1895. CONTENTS PART I AT HlNCHINBROOK PART II IN IRELAND PAGE 19 75 PART III IN LONDON 117 APPENDIX . 183 xvii PART I AT HINCHINBROOK JAMES HACKMAN, who figures as Mr. H. in this collection of letters, was born at Gosport, in the year 1752. His father was a retired Naval Lieutenant, with a modest income, which, however, was large enough to enable him to give his son a good general education, and to send him subse- quently to St. John's College, Cambridge. On leaving the University, James Hackman was apprenticed to a mercer in his native town but soon tiring of trade, he persuaded his father to buy him an ensigncy in the 68th Regiment of Foot. He was then quartered upon a recruiting party at Huntingdon, where he first made the acquaintance of the famous (or infamous) Earl of Sandwich, who was the First Lord of the Admiralty at that time. Cradock, in his " Memoirs," writes that a friend of Lord Sandwich's was a candidate 19 The Love Letters for the Chemistry Professorship at Cambridge, and that, as Cradock had been solicited for his vote and interest, the Earl invited him to travel in his coach, and to stay with him at his seat, Hinchinbrook, on his return journey to London. Cradock continues : "We went together and passed a very pleasant evening with a numerous party at the Rose Tavern, and having voted next morning, we returned to Hinchinbrook. Lord Sandwich, on meeting his neighbour, Major Reynolds, in the gateway with another officer, insisted on their alighting, and taking a family dinner at his house. The Major apologised for his intrusion, hoped his Lordship would excuse the liberty he had taken in bringing a brother officer with him, and then introduced his friend, Captain Hackman. The party merely consisted of Lord Sandwich, Miss Ray, and a lady with her, the two gentlemen, and myself. Dinner was soon served, and coffee called for. We played two rubbers at whist. Lord Sandwich held with Miss Ray, against Major Reynolds and myself; Captain Hackman requesting that he might only look over the cards." The Miss Ray (or Reay, as the name 20 of Mr. H. and Miss R. should be written) mentioned by Cradock, was living at Hinchinbrook, under the pro- tection of Lord Sandwich, to the easily imaginable distress of Lady Sandwich. At the age of fourteen, Miss Reay had been apprenticed to a mantua-maker in Clerken- well, and was subsequently introduced by her father, a stay-maker, to a customer of his, a woman of infamous profession, who, thinking that the girl was exceedingly pretty and intelligent, mentioned her to the dissolute Lord Sandwich. The Earl fell in love with Miss Reay the moment he saw her, and im- mediately took her under his protection. He gave her a good education, and had her thoroughly trained in music, of which art he was passionately fond ; he himself, Cradock tells us, was no mean performer upon the kettle-drums ! Oratorios and concerts were frequently given at Hinchinbrook, in which Miss Reay, owing to her beautiful voice, took part - } her personal charm and manner must have been exceptionally attractive, for it is related that she even captivated a Bishop's lady, who was terribly exercised at finding herself seated directly opposite to her at a dinner-party. Hackman was so fascinated 21 The Love Letters by Miss Reay that he could not keep away from the neighbourhood of Hinchinbrook, and, being a handsome, high-spirited young fellow, he soon became a welcome and fre- quent guest at the house. The result was that he fell desperately in love with his host's mistress, and it was not long before his love was reciprocated, and a clandestine correspondence ensued. The first two letters he sent to Miss Reay are written from Huntingdon. Dec. 4,1775- DEAR MARTHA, Ten thousand thanks for your billet by my corporal Trim yesterday. The fellow seemed happy to have been the bearer of it, because he saw it made me happy. He will be as good a soldier to Cupid as to Mars, I dare say. And Mars and Cupid are not now to begin their acquaintance, you know. Whichever he serve, you may command him of course, without a compliment ; for Venus, I need not tell you, is the mother of Cupid, and mistress of Mars. At present the drum is beating up under my window for volunteers to Bacchus. In 22 of Mr. H. and Miss R. plain English, the drum tells me dinner is ready ; for a drum gives us bloody-minded heroes an appetite for eating, as well as for fighting; nay, we get up by the beat of it, and it every night sends, or ought to send, us to bed and to sleep. To-night it will be late before I get to one or the other, I fancy indeed, the thoughts of you would prevent the latter. But the next disgrace to refusing a challenge, is refusing a toast. The merit of a jolly fellow and of a sponge is much about the same. For my part, no glass of any liquor tastes as it should to me, but when I kiss my Martha on the rim. Adieu whatever hard service I may have after dinner, no quantity of wine shall make me let drop or forget my appointment with you to-morrow. We certainly were not seen yesterday, for reasons I will give you. Though you should persist in never being mine, Ever, ever Yours. The Love Letters HUNTINGDON, Dec. 6th, 1775. MY DEAREST MARTHA, No, I will not take advantage of the sweet, reluctant, amorous confession which your candour gave me yesterday. If to make me happy be to make my Martha otherwise ; then, happiness, I'll none of thee. And yet I could argue. Suppose he has bred you up suppose you do owe your numerous accomplishments, under genius, to him are you therefore his property ? Is it as if a horse that he has bred up should refuse to carry him ? Suppose you therefore are his property will the fidelity of so many years weigh nothing in the scale of gratitude? Years why, can obligations (suppose they had not been repaid an hundred fold) do away the unnatural disparity of years ? Can they bid five-and-fifty stand still (the least that you could ask), and wait for five-and- twenty ? Many women have the same obligations (if indeed there be many of the same accomplishments) to their fathers. They have the additional obligation to them (if, indeed, it be an obligation) of existence. The disparity of years is sometimes even 24 of Mr. H. and Miss R. less. But, must they therefore take their fathers to their bosoms ? Must the jessamine fling its tender arms around the dying elm ? To my little fortunes you are no stranger. Will you share them with me? And you shall tell his Lordship that gratitude taught you to pay every duty to him, till love taught you there were other duties which you owed toH. Gracious heaven, that you would pay them ! But, did I not say I would not take ad- vantage ? I will not. I will even remind you of your children ; to whom I, alas ! could only show at present the affection of a father. Martha weighs us in the scales. If grati- tude out-balance love so. If you command it, I swear by love, I'll join my regiment to-morrow. If love prevail, and insist upon his dues, you shall declare the victory and the prize. I will take no advantage. Think over this. Neither will I take you by surprise. Sleep upon it, before you return your answer. Trim shall make the old excuse to-morrow. And, thank heaven ! to- night you sleep alone. 25 The Love Letters Why did you sing that sweet song yester- day, though I so pressed you ? Those words and your voice were too much. No words can say how much I am yours. Omiah, who is mentioned by Miss Reay in the following letter was a native of Otaheite, who was brought to England in 1775 by Captain Ferneaux in the Adventure, the con- sort of Captain Cook's ship the Resolution. Lord Sandwich took him up, and showed him all the sights. He went to Court and was introduced to George III., with whom he shook hands and said " How do you do ? " To MR. HACKMAN. HINCHINBROOK, Dec. j, 1775. MY DEAR H. Here has been a sad piece of work ever since I received yours yesterday. But don't be alarmed. We are not discovered to the prophane. Our tender tale is only known to (whom does your fear suggest ?) to love and gratitude, my H. And they ought both, for twenty reasons, to be your friends, I am sure. 26 of Mr. H. and Miss R. They have been trying your cause, ever since the departure of honest Trim yester- day. Love, though in my opinion not so blind, is as good a justice as Sir John Fielding. I argued the matter stoutly, my head on his lordship's side of the question, my heart on yours. At last they seemed to say, as if the oath of allegiance, which I had taken to gratitude, at a time when, Heaven knows, I had never heard of love, should be void, and I should be at full liberty to devote myself, body and soul, to but call on me to-morrow before dinner, and I'll tell you their final judgment. This I will tell you now love sent you the tenderest wishes, and gratitude said I could never pay you all I owe you for your noble letter of yesterday. Yet oh, my H. think not meanly of me ever for this. Do not you turn advocate against me. I will not pain you 'tis impos- sible you ever should. Come then to morrow : and surely Omiah will not murder love ! Yet I thought the other day he caught our eyes conversing. Eyes speak a language all can understand. But is a child of Nature to nip in the bud that favourite passion which his mother 27 The Love Letters Nature planted, and still tends ? What will Oberea and her coterie say to this, Omiah, when you return from making the tour of the globe ? They'll blackball you, depend on it. What would Rousseau say to it, my H. ? You shall tell me to-morrow. I will not write another word, lest conscience, who is just now looking over my left shoulder, should snatch my pen, and scratch out to- morrow. To MISS RE AY. HUNTINGDON, Dec. 7, 1775. MY DEAREST SOUL, I hope to heaven Trim will be able to get this to you to-night. Not I only, but my whole future life, shall thank you for the dear sheet of paper I have just received. Blessings, blessings ! But I could write and explain and offer up vows and prayers till the happy hour arrives. Yet, hear me, Martha. If I have thus far deserved your love, I will deserve it still. As a proof I have not hitherto pressed you for anything conscience disapproves: you shall not do to-morrow what conscience disapproves. You shall not make me happy (oh, how 28 of Mr. H. and Miss R. supremely blest!) under the roof of your bene- factor and my host. It were not honourable. Our love, the inexorable tyrant of our hearts, claims his sacrifices, but does not bid us insult his Lordship's walls with it. How civilly did he invite me to Hinchinbrook in October last, though an unknown recruiting officer! How politely himself first introduced me to himself! Often has the recollection made me struggle with my passion. Still it shall restrain it on this side honour. So far from triumphing or insulting, heaven knows if Lord Sandwich indeed love you, if indeed it be aught beside the natural preference which age gives to youth heaven knows how much I pity him. Yet, as I have either said or written before, it is only the pity I should feel for a father whose affections were unfortunately and unnaturally fixed upon his own daughter. Were I your seducer, Martha, and not your lover, I should not write thus, nor should I have talked or acted, or written as I have. Tell it not in Gath, nor publish it in the streets of Askalon, lest the Philistines should be upon me. I should be drummed out of my regimen for a traitor to intrigue. 29 The Love Letters And can you really imagine I think so meanly of your sex? Surely you cannot imagine I think so meanly of you. Why, then, the conclusion of your last letter but one ? A word thereon. Take men and women in the lump, the villany of those and the weakness of these I maintain it to be less wonderful that an hundred or so should fall in the world, than that even one should stand. Is it strange the serpent conquered Eve? The devil against a woman is fearful odds. He has conquered men, women's conquerors; he has made even angels fall. Oh, then, ye parents, be merciful in your wrath. Join not the base betrayers of your children, drive not your children to the bottom of the precipice, because the villains have driven them half way down, where (see, see !) many have stopped themselves from falling further by catching hold of some straggling virtue or another which decks the steep-down rock. Oh, do not force their weak hands from their hold, their last, last hold ! The descent from crime to crime is natural, per- pendicular, headlong enough of itself ; do not increase it. 30 of Mr. H. and Miss R. " Can women, then, no way but backward fall?" Shall I ask your pardon for all this, Martha ? No, there is no occasion, you say. But to-morrow, for to-morrow led me out of my strait path over this fearful precipice, where I, for my part, trembled every step I took lest I should topple down headlong. Glad am I to be once more on plain ground again with my Martha. To-morrow, about eleven, I'll be with you ; but let me find you in your riding-dress and your mare ready. I have laid a plan, to which neither honour nor delicacy (and I always consult both before I propose anything to you) can make the least objection. This once, trust to me : I'll explain all to-morrow. Pray be ready in your riding-dress. Need I add, in that you know I think becomes you most ? No, love would have whispered that. Love shall be of our party. He shall not suffer the cold to approach you; he shall spread his wings over your bosom ; he shall nestle in your dear arms, he shall. When will to-morrow come? What tor- turing dreams must I not bear to-night ? I send you some lines which I picked up The Love Letters somewhere, I forget where. But I don't think them much amiss. CELIA'S PICTURE. To paint my Celia, I'd devise Two summer suns in place of eyes ; Two lunar orbs should then be laid Upon the bosom of the maid ; Bright Berenice's auburn hair Should, where it ought, adorn my fair ; Nay, all the signs in heaven should prove But tokens of my wond'rous love. All, did I say ? Yes, all, save one ; Her yielding waist should want a zone, To MISS RE AY. HUNTINGDON, Dec. 8, 1775. Then I release my dearest soul from her promise about to-day. If you do not see that all which he can claim by gratitude, I doubly claim by love, I have done, and will for ever have done. I would purchase my happiness at any price, but at the expense of yours. Look over my letters, think over my con- duct, consult your own heart, and read these two long letters of your writing, which I return you. Then, tell me whether we love or not. And, if we love (as witness both 32 of Mr. H. and Miss R. our hearts), shall gratitude, cold gratitude, bear away the heavenly prize that's only due to love like ours ? Shall my right be acknowledged, and must he possess the casket ? Shall I have your soul, and shall he have your hand, your eyes, your bosom, your lips, your Gracious God of Love ! I can neither write nor think. Send one line, half a line to Your own, own H. To MR. HACKMAN. HINCHINBROOK, Dec. io, 1775. Your two letters of the day before yester- day, and what you said to me yesterday in my dressing-room, have drove me mad. To offer to sell out, and take the other step to get money for us both, was not kind. You know how such tenderness distracts me. As to marrying me, that you should not do upon any account. Shall the man I value be pointed at and hooted for selling himself to a Lord, for a commission, or some such thing, to marry his cast mistress ? My soul is above my situation. Besides, I will not take advan- tage, Mr. Hackman, of what may be only 33 o The Love Letters perhaps (excuse me) a youthful passion. After a more intimate acquaintance with me of a week or ten days, your opinion of me might very much change. And yet, you may love as sincerely as I But I will transcribe you a song which I do not believe you ever heard me sing, though it is my favourite. It is said to be an old Scots ballad, nor is it generally known that Lady A. L. wrote it. Since we have understood each other, I have never sung it before you, because it is so descriptive of our situation, how much more so since your cruelly kind proposal of yesterday ! I wept, like an infant over it this morning. AULD ROBIN GRAY. When the sheep are in fold, and the cows are at home, And all the weary world to rest is gone, The woes of my heart fall in showers from mine 'ee While my good man lays sound by me. Young Jamie lov'd me well, and he sought me for his bride, He had but a crown, he had no more beside ; To make the crown a pound, young Jamie went to sea, And the crown and the pound were both for me, of Mr. H. and Miss R. He had na been gone but a year and a day, When my father broke his arm, and our cow was stole away ; When my mother she fell sick, and my Jamie at the sea, And auld Robin Gray came wooing to me. My father could na work, and my mother could na spin, I toiled night and day, but their bread I could na win; Auld Rob maintam'd them both, and, with tears in his e'e, Said, " Jenny, for their sakes, oh ! marry me." My heart it said 'no, and I wish'd for Jamie back, But the wind it blew sore, and his ship prov'd a wreck ; His ship prov'd a wreck : Ah ! why did not Jenny dee ! Why was she left to cry " Woe is me ! " My father argu'd sore, though my mother did na speak ; She look'd in my face till my heart was fit to break ; So auld Robin got my hand, but my heart was in the sea, And now Robin Gray is good man to me. I had na been a wife but of weeks only four, When sitting right mournfully at my own door, 35 The Love Letters I saw my Jamie's ghost, for I could not think 'twas he, Till he said, "Jenny, I'm come home to marry thee." Sore did we weep, and little did we say, We took but one kiss, then tore ourselves away ; I wish I was dead, but I am not like to dee, But long shall be left to cry " Woe is me ! " I gang like a ghost, and I do not care to spin, I fain would think on Jamie, but that would be a sin ; must e'en do my best a good wife to be, For auld Robin Gray has been kind to me. My poor eyes will only suffer me to add, for God's sake, let me see my Jamie to- morrow. Your name also is Jamie. To MISS REAV. HUNTINGDON, Dec. 13, 1775. MY LIFE AND SOUL ! But I will never more use any preface of this sort, and I beg you will not. A correspondence begins with dear, then my dear, dearest, my dearest, and so on, till at last panting language toils after us in vain. No language can explain my feelings. Oh, M. yesterday, yesterday ! Language, thou 36 of Mr. H. and Miss R. liest ; there is no such word as satiety, posi- tively no such word. Oh thou, beyond my warmest dreams bewitching ! What charms ! What But words would poorly paint our joys. When, when ? yet you shall order, govern everything. Only remember, I am sure of those we trust. Are you now convinced that Heaven made us for each other ? By that Heaven, by the paradise of your dear arms, I will be only yours ! Have I written sense ? I know not what I write. This scrap of paper (it is all I can find) will hold a line or two more. I must fill it up to say that, whatever evils envious fate designed me, after those few hours of yesterday, I never will complain nor murmur. Misfortune, I defy thee now. M. loves me, and H.'s soul has its content most abso- lute. No other joy like this succeeds in unknown fate. To MISS RE AY. HUNTINGDON, Dec. 24, 1775. Talk not to me of the new year. I am a new man. I will be sworn to it I am not 37 The Love Letters the same identical James Hackman that I was three months ago. You have created me yes, I know what I say created me anew. As to thanking you for the bliss I taste with you, to attempt it would be idle. What thanks can express the Heaven of Heavens ! But I will obey you in not giving such a loose to my pen as I gave the day before yesterday. That letter, and the verses it contained, which were certainly too highly coloured, pray commit to the flames. Yet, pray too, as I begged you yesterday, do not imagine I thought less chastely of you because I wrote them. By Heaven ! I believe your mind as chaste as the snow which, while I write, is driving against my window. You know not what I think of you. One time, perhaps, you may. The lines I repeated to you this morning are not mine. I think of them quite as you do. Surely an additional merit in them is, that to the uninitiated, in whom they might, perhaps, raise improper ideas, they are totally unintelligible. 38, of Mr. H. and Miss R. Jo MR. HACKMAN. HINCHINBROOK, Christmas Day, 1775. My old friend the Corporal looked as if he had been tarred and feathered yesterday, when he arrived with your dear billet. Omiah took up the sugar-caster, when he saw him through the parlour window, and powdered a fresh slice of pudding, by way of painting the snowy Corporal. Omiah's simplicity is certainly very diverting, but I should like him better, and take more pains with him, if I did not think he suspected something. The other day I am sure he came to spy the nakedness of the land. Thank heaven ! our caution prevented him. Respecting the poetry which you repeated to me the other day, I know not whether, as you say, those to whom it could do any harm could possibly understand it. For uninitiated means, I believe, not yet admitted into the mysteries, those who have not yet taken the veil ; or, / should rather say, those who have not yet thrown off the veil. Why was I not permitted by my destiny to keep on mine, till my H., my Mars, seized me in his ardent arms ? How gladly to his arms would I have given up my very soul ! 39 The Love Letters Cruel fortune, that it cannot be so to-day ! But we forgot, when we fixed on to-day, that it would be Christmas Day. I must do penance at a most unpleasant dinner, as indeed is every meal and every scene when you are absent, and that, without the con- solation of having first enjoyed your com- pany. To-morrow, however, at the usual time and place. Your discontinuing your visits here, since the first day of our happiness, gratifies the delicacy of us both. Yet, may it not, my H., raise suspicions elsewhere ? Your agreeable qualities were too conspicuous not to make you missed. Yet, you are the best judge. My poor, innocent, helpless babes ! Were it not on your account, your mother would not act the part she does. What is Mrs. Yates's sustaining a character well for one evening ? Is it so trying as to play a part, and a base one too, morning, noon, and night? Night I But I will not make my H. uneasy. At least, allow that I have written you a long scrawl. Behold, I have sent you a tolerable good substitute for myself. It is reckoned very like. I need not beg 40 of Mr. H. and Miss R. you not to show it. Only remember, the painter's Martha is not to rob your own Martha of a certain quantity of things called and known by the name of kisses, which I humbly conceive to be her due, though she has been disappointed of them to-day. So, having nothing further to add at present, and the post being just going out, I remain with all truth, Dear Sir, Your most humble servant, MARTHA. There is a pretty conclusion for you. Am I not a good girl ? I shall become a most elegant correspondent in time, I see. This paragraph is the postscript, you know, and should therefore have been introduced by a well-flourished P.S., the Sir Clement Cottrel upon these occasions. To MISS RE A Y. HUNTINGDON, Dec. 28, 1775. Your condescension in removing my most groundless cause of jealousy yesterday was more than I deserved. How I exposed my- self by my violence with you ! But, I tell 41 The Love Letters you, my passions are all gunpowder. Though, thank God ! no Othello yet am I. One not easily jealous ; but, being wrought, Perplex'd in the extreme. and that God knows how I love you, worship you, idolise you. How could I think you particular to such a thing as B. ? You said you forgave me to- day, and I hope you did. Let me have it again from your own dear lips to-morrow, instead of the next day. Everything shall be ready, and the guitar, which I wrote for, is come down, and I will bring the song and you shall sing it, and play it, and I will beg you to forgive me, and you shall forgive me, and five hundred ands besides. Why, I would be jealous of this sheet of paper, if you kissed it with too much rapture. What a fool ! No, my Martha, rather say what a lover ! Many thanks for your picture. It is like. Accept this proof that I have examined it. 'Tis true, creative man, thine art can teach The living picture every thing but speech ! True, thou hast drawn her, as she is, all fair, Divinely fair ! her lips, her eyes, her hair ! 42 of Mr. H. and Miss R. Full well I know the smile upon that face, Full well I know those features' every grace ! But, what is this, my Martha's mortal part, There is a subject beggars all thine art ; Paint but her mind, by Heav'n ! and thou shalt be, Shalt be my more than pagan deity. Nature may possibly have cast, of old, Some other beauty in as fair a mould ; But all in vain you'll search the world to find Another beauty with so fair a mind. To MISS RE A Y. HUNTINGDON, Jan. i, 1776. Lest I should not see you this morning, I will scribble this before I mount honest Crop, that I may leave it for you. This is a new year. May every day of it be happy to my Martha. May but do not you know there is not a wish of bliss I do not wish you ? A new year, I like not this word. There may be new lovers. I lie, there may not. Martha will never change her H., I am sure she will never change him for a truer lover. A new year '76. Where shall we be in '77? Where in '78? Where in '79 ? Where in '80 ? In misery or bliss, in life or death, in 43 The Love Letters heaven or hell, wherever jy